vote for a republican candidate for president

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

one of these people is going to win. on some level you have to be rooting for one of these guys as the least-bad-situation-for-america, either because they'll lose horribly (trump/cruz) or because they're not psychopaths (rubio, bush, christie)

so pretend you're forced to submit a gop vote in the iowa caucus. what's it gonna be?

Poll Results

OptionVotes
Donald Trump 22
John Kasich 17
Jeb Bush 13
Ted Cruz 9
Marco Rubio 5
Chris Christie 4


iatee, Friday, 29 January 2016 19:35 (eight years ago) link

Time for Jeb, I say

frogbs, Friday, 29 January 2016 19:35 (eight years ago) link

christie is a pschopath

mizzell, Friday, 29 January 2016 19:38 (eight years ago) link

christie seems like an electable psychopath which is the most worrying of all?

ciderpress, Friday, 29 January 2016 19:39 (eight years ago) link

I don't think christie is a psychopath, he's your run of the mill asshole from jersey

iatee, Friday, 29 January 2016 19:40 (eight years ago) link

i think cruz is the least likely to win a general election out of these so i guess him? idk

ciderpress, Friday, 29 January 2016 19:42 (eight years ago) link

I have the solution!

(leaps off a bridge)

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Friday, 29 January 2016 19:42 (eight years ago) link

let me preface the statements I'm about to make with acknowledging that I hate all of these choices and would almost rather set myself on fire than actually cast a vote for any of them

HAVING SAID THAT, even though I still think it's virtually impossible for him to win a general election, I cannot countenance or abide the idea of President Trump and would never put him in a position where he could fluke his way into the White House.

John Kasich is a reasonable-seeming man who has done some reasonable-seeming things while saying and doing a bunch of batshit crazy things that seem to now be flying under the radar.

Ted Cruz is possibly the most polarizing political figure you could pick on the Republican side and, if he managed to build consensus in Washington, it would be a consensus that was attempting to frustrate and stymie every policy position he might put forward.

This leaves Rubio, Bush and Christie as the only viable choices on the list.

Rubio spent half his time avoiding being a senator; I don't think we need him avoiding being President.

Bush would probably be mostly harmless but this entire campaign has outed him as someone who is very easily bullied, which is not someone I want to put out there on the international scene as our representative.

This means that the person I feel is most qualified and capable of being our President on the Republican side of the choices listed here is the petty blowhard whose staff killed an old woman as a side-effect of a political vendetta. (I'm less concerned about his ability to talk out of both sides of his mouth, as that's actually a skill that would be useful when dealing with other nations.)

Now if you'll excuse me, I need to go find some gasoline and a match.

its subtle brume (DJP), Friday, 29 January 2016 19:43 (eight years ago) link

ffs I can't even to bring myself to vote for Christie in a fucking ILX poll

its subtle brume (DJP), Friday, 29 January 2016 19:44 (eight years ago) link

I live in New Jersey. The only thing I'd vote for Christie for would be "Which one of these people should we hurl off a cliff first?"

Donald Trump: Totally insane
Ted Cruz: Utterly loathsome
Marco Rubio: Dumb as a stump
Jeb Bush: He's a Bush, plus, Terri Schiavo
Chris Christie: see above
John Kasich: Not totally insane, and doesn't seem to view poor people as enemies of the state, but not actually that much better than the rest (way too into Jesus, even if he keeps a lid on it most of the time)

the top man in the language department (誤訳侮辱), Friday, 29 January 2016 19:45 (eight years ago) link

I have relatives in Cleveland, Akron and Cincinnati so I have been hearing enough about the Kasich Experience to make him a total no-go for me

its subtle brume (DJP), Friday, 29 January 2016 19:47 (eight years ago) link

lol this poll is going to boil down to "who do you detest less: Christie or Kasich" isn't it

its subtle brume (DJP), Friday, 29 January 2016 19:50 (eight years ago) link

yeah but you might be wasting your imaginary vote on dudes w/ maybe a 5% chance at winning, so it's kinda an easy out. if you limit yourself to who you think could actually win this gets a lot harder.

iatee, Friday, 29 January 2016 19:53 (eight years ago) link

which is why I think...I've started rooting for a jeb! comeback? I guess?

iatee, Friday, 29 January 2016 19:54 (eight years ago) link

i think the greatest trick trump/cruz have ever pulled is making the rest of these clowns look like benevolent moderates

nomar, Friday, 29 January 2016 19:55 (eight years ago) link

why isn't Rand Paul on this ballot?

The Once-ler, Friday, 29 January 2016 19:55 (eight years ago) link

I included everyone with more than a 0% here: http://predictwise.com/politics/2016-president-republican-nomination

iatee, Friday, 29 January 2016 19:57 (eight years ago) link

however the best trick trump himself individually has ever pulled is systematically destroying all of them as "strong" candidates, i mean it's almost breathtaking how he's left their carcasses in his wake

nomar, Friday, 29 January 2016 19:57 (eight years ago) link

I would think that after last night's debate Rand Paul's #s would go up. The Iowans were cheering on his anti-NSA and contrarian middle east tactics

The Once-ler, Friday, 29 January 2016 20:02 (eight years ago) link

why r u ppl riffing on Keyser Soze

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Friday, 29 January 2016 20:03 (eight years ago) link

I would think that after last night's debate Rand Paul's #s would go up. The Iowans were cheering on his anti-NSA and contrarian middle east tactics

rand paul has a small loyal posse that cheers for him loudly whenever he talks. if you watched them all it was pretty cringe-worthy cause it felt like when someone's family cheers for them at a recital or something.

iatee, Friday, 29 January 2016 20:05 (eight years ago) link

iatee,
make's sense. it's would be hard to believe Republicans would cheer on anything other than throwing money at a hopeless war and equipping people who may not be our friends

The Once-ler, Friday, 29 January 2016 20:07 (eight years ago) link

voted trump bcz i wanna make america great again

Butt here is always time for the John Mayer Trio or Sting. (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 29 January 2016 20:10 (eight years ago) link

can't wait to become a us citizen and vote republican

F♯ A♯ (∞), Friday, 29 January 2016 20:12 (eight years ago) link

hell yeah I'm voting for Jeb

frogbs, Friday, 29 January 2016 20:20 (eight years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/riFc2kO.jpg

F♯ A♯ (∞), Friday, 29 January 2016 20:23 (eight years ago) link

trump would yield the most entertaining results but the risk of him actually becoming president is not something i want to gamble on.

kasich acts like the "reasonable" one in debates but he's kind of weird and loopy otherwise. also doubt he would win the nomination since republican voters seem to hate candidates who act reasonable.

christie comes across like the irritable boss in an old sitcom and rubio has the demeanor of someone running for student council president.

bush seems oddly boring and unthreatening compared to most of these guys but the psychological blow of having another bush in the white house would be crushing.

cruz is widely despised on a personal level by a lot of other republicans and would prob have a lot more trouble winning the election than any of the other candidates. so maybe him.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Friday, 29 January 2016 20:37 (eight years ago) link

rubio has the demeanor of someone running for student council president.

oh man. good way of putting it

frogbs, Friday, 29 January 2016 20:38 (eight years ago) link

it's Bush, imo - I mean, isn't his campaign largely predicated on the notion -- now proven false, doubtless to the shock and horror of the very same people who spent the better part of 20 years stage-managing the conditions for exactly a scenario like this -- that voters will choose the candidate who seems most rational, most approachable, most believably likable? I'm one of the dinosaur voters his campaign would have had in mind, who'd look at this field and go, woof, I don't like any of 'em but at least Bush doesn't seem like a heartless monster. it would smart to put another Bush in office but not as bad as seeing the Presidency of any of these other bros would smart.

tremendous crime wave and killing wave (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Friday, 29 January 2016 21:48 (eight years ago) link

Rubio has the personality of a toaster and the speaking style of an empty salt shaker. I grew up and went to school with frauds like him; it was inevitable that one of them would run for prez.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 29 January 2016 21:55 (eight years ago) link

like I wrote last night: When Rand Paul speaks movingly about getting drug offenders out of jail and scoffing at the platoon of sadists onstage who consider Vlad the Putin Vlad the Impaler, he then speaks passionately about the Tenth Amendment and throwing the poor to the mercy of the platoon of sadists onstage.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 29 January 2016 21:56 (eight years ago) link

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

System, Monday, 1 February 2016 00:01 (eight years ago) link

thoughts? - https://www.facebook.com/stanley.steele.372/videos/793993664043730/

flappy bird, Monday, 1 February 2016 02:47 (eight years ago) link

jeb wouldn't even be the worst bush presidency of my lifetime

J0rdan S., Monday, 1 February 2016 02:54 (eight years ago) link

an interesting poll idea

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 1 February 2016 03:01 (eight years ago) link

jeb's opinions are bad but he seems the most reasonable to me. cruz & christie etc have flown to the right to try and win the primary but jeb has mostly stuck with what he believes. kasich's centricity seems focused group to me.

J0rdan S., Monday, 1 February 2016 03:07 (eight years ago) link

Never forget: Bono is a friend.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 1 February 2016 03:08 (eight years ago) link

Trump vote silver lining - could easily see him being the first President removed from Office. The rest of these clowns would be just as disastrous but probably fulfill their entire term.

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 1 February 2016 04:03 (eight years ago) link

I clicked on Jeb, no exclamation mark attached. If I had a vote and had to vote, that's who I'd vote for. I'll be rooting for Trump + chaos, although at this point, Trump winning is probably less chaotic for the party than other possible outcomes.

clemenza, Monday, 1 February 2016 04:18 (eight years ago) link

trump without a doubt. him running on the republican ticket does not scare me a bit. and even if by some miracle he were elected, i sort of doubt he'd govern anywhere close to how rightward he's currently campaigning

k3vin k., Monday, 1 February 2016 04:37 (eight years ago) link

my fear with trump would be not that he would govern too far from the right but that he would forget to do something and like, we'd crack the debt ceiling or something

J0rdan S., Monday, 1 February 2016 04:40 (eight years ago) link

Trump for the lolz.

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Monday, 1 February 2016 04:50 (eight years ago) link

Trump would call up Rent-A-Rasputin and install one in the Lincoln Bedroom to help him govern.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 1 February 2016 05:38 (eight years ago) link

I'm trying to figure out which one I despise the least and it's way harder than it should be. I think I'll go with Rubio and hope he inadvertently dehydrates himself into a four year coma.

Sara R-C, Monday, 1 February 2016 06:21 (eight years ago) link

i'd have to vote kasich here. I don't like his stance on reproductive rights at all but he's the most reasonable person on this ballot, except for , maybe, jeb or christie....but jeb is jeb and christie is probably a crook.

akm, Monday, 1 February 2016 06:39 (eight years ago) link

wkiw christie

flopson, Monday, 1 February 2016 08:20 (eight years ago) link

i would be terrified of trump if america was a parliamentary democracy or if trump had his own paramilitary organization, but as neither of those things are true i am not super worried about him being elected.

diana krallice (rushomancy), Monday, 1 February 2016 11:59 (eight years ago) link

none of these would compel me to vote for HRC.

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 1 February 2016 12:57 (eight years ago) link

you should move to a swing state so your threats to not vote dem actually mean something

iatee, Monday, 1 February 2016 13:37 (eight years ago) link

swing this

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 1 February 2016 15:17 (eight years ago) link

I voted Jeb. Kasich is another boringly bad-but-not-that-bad candidate. I feel like any candidate has a slim margin of victory due to the chances of the opposing candidate dying or making a royal fuckup, so no Trump or Carson for the lulz.

remove butt (abanana), Monday, 1 February 2016 18:10 (eight years ago) link

The exerpt from Double Down does make Christie seem like a psychopath, but I understand that Mark Halperin is one of the dumbest reporters out there and probably fell for some insider politics bullshit.

remove butt (abanana), Monday, 1 February 2016 18:13 (eight years ago) link

Trump. He's a left of center democrat. He doesn't give a shit about building a wall, making a database for Muslims, or abortion. He's a great actor.

flappy bird, Monday, 1 February 2016 18:55 (eight years ago) link

He also doesn't give a shit about you or me or the country or the rest of the world or the future, except as possible instruments for further self-glorification.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 1 February 2016 18:58 (eight years ago) link

Ted Cruz would be the most fun snl impression, so him

rip van wanko, Monday, 1 February 2016 19:04 (eight years ago) link

wanna clarify i voted for trump when i posted up-thread and foresee him winning not only the iowa caucus but the presidential election

F♯ A♯ (∞), Monday, 1 February 2016 20:24 (eight years ago) link

I can't recall Jeb! saying anything too batshit, feel like he'd be ok. These other guys have given me at least a couple o_O moments a piece.

lute bro (brimstead), Monday, 1 February 2016 20:43 (eight years ago) link

terry schiavo episode's not batshit enough for you?

Οὖτις, Monday, 1 February 2016 20:44 (eight years ago) link

D'oh, like the general electorate I have short memory

lute bro (brimstead), Monday, 1 February 2016 20:46 (eight years ago) link

Jeb!s typical brand of batshit is to blandly give the rich yet another round of tax cuts.

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 1 February 2016 20:46 (eight years ago) link

Of the possible GOP presidential scenarios this time 'round, having another Bush in the White House would probably induce the least amount of dread and panic in me. That's where we're at in 2016.

Chortles And Guffaws (Old Lunch), Monday, 1 February 2016 20:47 (eight years ago) link

like someone said upthread, Jeb seems like such a pushover. His line at the last debate about missing Donald Trump because "he was like a little teddy bear to me" was just totally bizarre. And he's a Bush.

flappy bird, Monday, 1 February 2016 20:47 (eight years ago) link

Well, yeah, but this is like deciding which incurable venereal disease you want to contract.

Chortles And Guffaws (Old Lunch), Monday, 1 February 2016 20:49 (eight years ago) link

Jeb! == genital warts

a little too mature to be cute (Aimless), Monday, 1 February 2016 20:49 (eight years ago) link

Sometimes it seems to me that Jeb Rubio and Christie are seemingly the only ones aware that they're running for president of the USA as opposed to The Real World (Crazy Rich Old People Edition) /trenchant

lute bro (brimstead), Monday, 1 February 2016 20:50 (eight years ago) link

I feel like if I click any of these I'm going to get an electric shock and a startling all-caps message that reads "SURPRISE! YOU PICKED THE ONE THAT'S SECRETLY WORSE THAN TRUMP!"

so Trump.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Monday, 1 February 2016 20:51 (eight years ago) link

I can't even imagine what this election cycle must be like for people who are somewhat reasonable and identify as republicans. I do have some sympathy for those people. I'd like for them to be able to vote for a non-insane, and for Clinton to not just take the White House in a walk because she's running against a certifiable lunatic.

Chortles And Guffaws (Old Lunch), Monday, 1 February 2016 20:52 (eight years ago) link

Those people are all about Rubio. They've been deep in prayer for a while now.

flappy bird, Monday, 1 February 2016 20:55 (eight years ago) link

I have no good feelings for those people, lol

lute bro (brimstead), Monday, 1 February 2016 20:56 (eight years ago) link

I haven't known as reasonable Republican since 1980

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 1 February 2016 20:59 (eight years ago) link

We have family friends that fall in that category, and it's always a little hard to hate family friends for their politics alone even if you know deep down that their politics represent a sheltered, blinkered, and/or willfully self-deceived worldview.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Monday, 1 February 2016 21:00 (eight years ago) link

Alfred otm

those people are all gone/dead. Although I am v curious to hear what my right-leaning oldest uncle thinks.

xp

Οὖτις, Monday, 1 February 2016 21:01 (eight years ago) link

Even some of those I'm not always sure whether they're "reasonable" or just too graceful to say some of the more odious stuff they believe.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Monday, 1 February 2016 21:02 (eight years ago) link

i don't feel bad for republicans bc this is the party they've basically been wanting for decades, congrats to them imo they finally achieved full moron

nomar, Monday, 1 February 2016 21:02 (eight years ago) link

I guess I should say not republicans per se but people whose views are to the right of mine but not fueled by incoherent xenophobia. I'd like to think there's room for respectful disagreement and candidates who represent a variety of views and not just 'sorta left but not really' and 'we have to be physically restrained from smearing shit in our hair'.

Chortles And Guffaws (Old Lunch), Monday, 1 February 2016 21:05 (eight years ago) link

most of the "reasonable" Republicans I know like Rand Paul, which is just like dude come on

its subtle brume (DJP), Monday, 1 February 2016 21:09 (eight years ago) link

The "reasonable" Republicans I know have been strangely silent this election cycle.

Retro novelty punk (Dan Peterson), Monday, 1 February 2016 21:13 (eight years ago) link

"Reasonable Republicans" in 2016 are college students who support gay marriage but think this couple has no right to unemployment benefits or that Social Security has a lot of "abuse."

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 1 February 2016 21:15 (eight years ago) link

The reasonable Republican choice is Hillary.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 1 February 2016 21:16 (eight years ago) link

They're democrats now /trenchant encore

lute bro (brimstead), Monday, 1 February 2016 21:16 (eight years ago) link

Lol xp

lute bro (brimstead), Monday, 1 February 2016 21:16 (eight years ago) link

Alfred OTM

its subtle brume (DJP), Monday, 1 February 2016 21:17 (eight years ago) link

kasich because the NYT told me so.

Sharkie, Monday, 1 February 2016 21:21 (eight years ago) link

the New York Times endorsements: when you just might want to vote for somebody who could almost be in the other party

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 1 February 2016 21:25 (eight years ago) link

btw it's worth noting that the Iowa republican caucus system is batshit crazy. they used to not caucus and had a straw poll, and then they switched to secret ballot that was conspiratorial because they sent delegates for who they wanted anyway and ignored the numbers (lol)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iowa_caucuses#Republican_Party_process

the democrat process isn't anything near a "vote" in that you stand around in groups, and any "non-viable" groups either have to merge or wander off, and it's silly and contentious https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iowa_caucuses#Democratic_Party_process

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 1 February 2016 21:46 (eight years ago) link

caucusing is bizarre, no doubt about it, some sort of pale imitation of Athenian democratic procedures or something

Οὖτις, Monday, 1 February 2016 21:47 (eight years ago) link

The Iowa Caucuses were infiltrated with "Dipshit gas" in 2008 and 2012. Therefore, our nation was stuck with President Obama for 8 years. Due to those 2 caucuses, our country has a 19 trillion dollar debt and the rest of the world thinks of our government is full of a bunch of dipshit democrats.

!

Hi! I'm twice-coloured! (Sund4r), Monday, 1 February 2016 22:00 (eight years ago) link

the existence of this gas would explain a great many things, i admit

the thirteenth floorior (Doctor Casino), Monday, 1 February 2016 22:01 (eight years ago) link

If you smelt it you dealt it imo

Karl Malone, Monday, 1 February 2016 22:03 (eight years ago) link

uh hello they didn't caucus in 2012 for an incumbent, they just elected local party delegates

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 1 February 2016 22:04 (eight years ago) link

If caucuses are going to be these weird semi-choreographed things they should at least involve square dancing and vuvuzelas or something

lute bro (brimstead), Monday, 1 February 2016 22:06 (eight years ago) link

we don't tell anyone outside the state and we hide them if it's a caucus with media present, but... we have vuvuzelas

μpright mammal (mh), Monday, 1 February 2016 22:10 (eight years ago) link

i would move to the heartland if i could caucus and squaredance simultaneously

we can be heroes just for about 3.6 seconds (Dr Morbius), Monday, 1 February 2016 22:20 (eight years ago) link

that could be another test really. at this point, requiring the candidates to walk and chew gum at the same time would consolidate the race considerably.

the thirteenth floorior (Doctor Casino), Monday, 1 February 2016 22:22 (eight years ago) link

can't even imagine what this election cycle must be like for people who are somewhat reasonable and identify as republicans. I do have some sympathy for those people. I'd like for them to be able to vote for a non-insane, and for Clinton to not just take the White House in a walk because she's running against a certifiable lunatic.

― Chortles And Guffaws (Old Lunch), Monday, February 1, 2016 2:52 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Monday, 1 February 2016 22:28 (eight years ago) link

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

System, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 00:01 (eight years ago) link

Sorry CC

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 2 February 2016 00:12 (eight years ago) link

please, please let trump cite this poll at his next event

the thirteenth floorior (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 2 February 2016 01:07 (eight years ago) link

Great!

"I don't know, they tell me I'm winning all the polls, we're just winning winning winning...The Des Moines Register poll, we won that, ILX--I don't know even know ILX, but they tell me they're terrific people there--we won the ILX poll, and I even hear that Ted Cruz got almost nothing there, so who knows."

clemenza, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 01:23 (eight years ago) link

CLINTON 53% SANDERS 46%
TRUMP 33% CRUZ 32% RUBIO 13%

flappy bird, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 01:48 (eight years ago) link

where are you getting this

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 2 February 2016 01:49 (eight years ago) link

that's with... 4% of votes in per CNN.

the thirteenth floorior (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 2 February 2016 01:51 (eight years ago) link

too close to call re Sanders and Clinton

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 February 2016 01:55 (eight years ago) link

watching a republican caucus and it's just a guy opening opening pieces of paper and reading the names written on them. excruciatingly boring television!

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:07 (eight years ago) link

and MSNBC stayed on that dude for five minutes

he was kinda cute though

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:07 (eight years ago) link

MSNBC has the most number of gay reporters and anchors on the air

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:08 (eight years ago) link

where are you getting this

― Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Monday, February 1, 2016 8:49 PM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

drudge

flappy bird, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:09 (eight years ago) link

the paper opening on msnbc was amazing, i hope they cut back to it

flappy bird, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:09 (eight years ago) link

i'm listening on the radio fwiw

flappy bird, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:09 (eight years ago) link

OK now I'm watching a neurasthenic MSNBC reporter ambling around a basketball court isolating O'Malley supporters.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:15 (eight years ago) link

the caucus process is so fucked

flappy bird, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:18 (eight years ago) link

"i'm holding out for o'malley"
"seems like a heavy lift right now?"
"...yeah"

-msnbc

flappy bird, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:19 (eight years ago) link

OMIGOD irate college student said "fucked up" on TV.

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:31 (eight years ago) link

oh my god get these kids OFF OF THE TV

flappy bird, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:33 (eight years ago) link

"we apologize for that bit of french that snuck into our english language translation" LOL

flappy bird, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:34 (eight years ago) link

Chris Matthews reduced to praising the photography inside hotel rooms ("It's history! It's cinema verite!")

The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:40 (eight years ago) link

^^haha really?

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:45 (eight years ago) link

"ground game", love how hard MSNBC is going here

Sharkie, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:47 (eight years ago) link

Marshall County, folks

Crazy Eddie & Jesus the Kid (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 2 February 2016 02:48 (eight years ago) link

it's interesting how Cruz coming out ahead gave Rubio a bump in the predictions markets. i hope rubes gets the nom, out of the three. seems extra guaranteed to lose, and I'm even more terrified of Cruz than trump

flopson, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 16:24 (eight years ago) link

why do you figure rubio has less of a chance in the general than trump or cruz?

k3vin k., Tuesday, 2 February 2016 16:27 (eight years ago) link

I would've picked Rubio as the only one of those three who could win a general

frogbs, Tuesday, 2 February 2016 16:32 (eight years ago) link

we still have new hampshire. come on trump!

F♯ A♯ (∞), Tuesday, 2 February 2016 19:54 (eight years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.