*stinkeye*
― imago, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 12:30 (eight years ago)
boooooo
― proton, neutron, electron and crouton (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 12:34 (eight years ago)
no
― akm, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 12:34 (eight years ago)
A mod can change it later. Quite like this though. Already feels calming
― imago, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 12:38 (eight years ago)
Yeah, I think we're in for smooth sailing from here on out.
― Winky Carrothers (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 12:41 (eight years ago)
http://jackcanfield.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/how-to-meditate-jack-canfield.jpg
― brownie, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 12:41 (eight years ago)
https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/94691972b30f9ad52d65fb0c9814b722551ed0c7/r=x404&c=534x401/http/assets.gannettdigital.com/-mm-/ef315d5df1cd019af6862e995e3c35911ece8caf/c=28-0-479-338/local/-/media/Louisville/2014/01/27/enjoylife.jpg
― Winky Carrothers (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 12:49 (eight years ago)
wtf this dude isn't even american ? we need some extreme vetting for thread starters .
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 13:05 (eight years ago)
that's very isolationist of u
― imago, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 13:05 (eight years ago)
http://www.marketwire.com/library/20110421-2via800.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 13:09 (eight years ago)
GOOD mourning!
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 13:10 (eight years ago)
wtf this dude isn't even american ? we need some extreme vetting for thread starters
ban lj
― proton, neutron, electron and crouton (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 13:11 (eight years ago)
LJ otm but ban lj
― Gary Synaesthesia (darraghmac), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 13:16 (eight years ago)
Thanking u ppl across the pond for MingAGA
― Winky Carrothers (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 13:17 (eight years ago)
lmao wow really powerful statement now this thread totally won't be 100 percent the exact same obsessing about Trump except without a good titleyou guys should work for John Oliverthing is, we deserve Trump threadslj sorry I love you it pains me to do this but ban lj
― Universal LULU Nation (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 13:27 (eight years ago)
oh fer fuck's sake
not using his name = typical lib empty move
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, November 1, 2017 7:36 AM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
morbz otm
― marcos, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 13:32 (eight years ago)
A poll of the Trump Year One thread titles has given me a greater appreciation of minimalism *clinks tankard of terrible beer with imago, pours beer into potplant*
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 13:34 (eight years ago)
ban andrew farrell
― proton, neutron, electron and crouton (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 13:34 (eight years ago)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3PakAiTZWAs/hqdefault.jpg
me rn, blessig u lj
― Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 13:39 (eight years ago)
so is Trump really going to try to blame Chuck Schumer directly for this terrorist attack
― frogbs, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 14:00 (eight years ago)
worked for lee atwater
― Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 14:05 (eight years ago)
Schumer did 10/31
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 14:06 (eight years ago)
where's the tax returns?
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 14:13 (eight years ago)
it's as if Trump has something he'd like to detract attention from
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 14:15 (eight years ago)
the Democrats paid the Russians to rig the election so that Hillary would win, right? guess it didn't work! MAGA
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 14:19 (eight years ago)
Chuck Schumer@SenSchumer 2h2 hours agoI guess it's not too soon to politicize a tragedy.
― nashwan, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 14:43 (eight years ago)
I have just ordered Homeland Security to step up our already Extreme Vetting Program. Being politically correct is fine, but not for this!
A depressing thing about this is that the bolded section won't actually lose him any votes why because pissing on brown people.
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 14:55 (eight years ago)
i think NOT IN THE U.S.A.! shd be part of thread title
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 14:57 (eight years ago)
fuck Schmuck too:
President Trump, where is your leadership? The contrast btwn Pres Bush’s actions after 9-11 & Pres Trump’s this am couldn't be starker.— Chuck Schumer (@SenSchumer) November 1, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 14:58 (eight years ago)
has Yam started two wars ALREADY?
i mean he's right in the sense that trump didn't immediately start putting plans into motion to invade afghanistan, but somehow i doubt that's the angle he had in mind xp
― proton, neutron, electron and crouton (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 15:00 (eight years ago)
Can we add "DO SOMETHING!" to the thread title?
― Moodles, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 15:02 (eight years ago)
NEW: These are the first two Russian-bought Facebook ads to be released by Congress. pic.twitter.com/1ThgzYNdTf— Donie O'Sullivan (@donie) October 31, 2017
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 15:08 (eight years ago)
'hillary clinton has a 69 percent disapproval rating'
nice
― proton, neutron, electron and crouton (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 15:09 (eight years ago)
check the DEMS!
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 15:11 (eight years ago)
check the record check the record check the DEMS rock record
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 15:31 (eight years ago)
oops track
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 15:33 (eight years ago)
a punch in the nose
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/manafort-fight-over-attorney-speaking
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 15:33 (eight years ago)
what about all the bad things Hillary Clinton said about Russia? We demand equal time!
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 15:34 (eight years ago)
mr. trump's tax returns are going to be a doozy :)
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 15:41 (eight years ago)
― proton, neutron, electron and crouton (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 15:09 (thirty-four minutes ago) Permalink
Trump: I'm going to have an even better approval rating. I'm going to have the best approval rating you've ever seen, a 420 percent approval rating.
― IF (Terrorist) Yes, Explain (man alive), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 15:44 (eight years ago)
ban marcos
― grawlix (unperson), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 15:45 (eight years ago)
lol
― marcos, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 15:50 (eight years ago)
Awaiting Trump's coal comeback, miners reject retraining
When Mike Sylvester entered a career training center earlier this year in southwestern Pennsylvania, he found more than one hundred federally funded courses covering everything from computer programming to nursing.He settled instead on something familiar: a coal mining course.”I think there is a coal comeback,” said the 33-year-old son of a miner.Despite broad consensus about coal’s bleak future, a years-long effort to diversify the economy of this hard-hit region away from mining is stumbling, with Obama-era jobs retraining classes undersubscribed and future programs at risk under President Donald Trump’s proposed 2018 budget.Trump has promised to revive coal by rolling back environmental regulations and moved to repeal Obama-era curbs on carbon emissions from power plants.“I have a lot of faith in President Trump,” Sylvester said.But hundreds of coal-fired plants have closed in recent years, and cheap natural gas continues to erode domestic demand. The Appalachian region has lost about 33,500 mining jobs since 2011, according to the Appalachian Regional Commission.Although there have been small gains in coal output and hiring this year, driven by foreign demand, production levels remain near lows hit in 1978.A White House official did not respond to requests for comment on coal policy and retraining for coal workers.
He settled instead on something familiar: a coal mining course.
”I think there is a coal comeback,” said the 33-year-old son of a miner.
Despite broad consensus about coal’s bleak future, a years-long effort to diversify the economy of this hard-hit region away from mining is stumbling, with Obama-era jobs retraining classes undersubscribed and future programs at risk under President Donald Trump’s proposed 2018 budget.
Trump has promised to revive coal by rolling back environmental regulations and moved to repeal Obama-era curbs on carbon emissions from power plants.
“I have a lot of faith in President Trump,” Sylvester said.
But hundreds of coal-fired plants have closed in recent years, and cheap natural gas continues to erode domestic demand. The Appalachian region has lost about 33,500 mining jobs since 2011, according to the Appalachian Regional Commission.
Although there have been small gains in coal output and hiring this year, driven by foreign demand, production levels remain near lows hit in 1978.
A White House official did not respond to requests for comment on coal policy and retraining for coal workers.
― grawlix (unperson), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:02 (eight years ago)
BRAEKING NEWS SEBASTIAN GORKA PARKS ILLEGALLY ON SIDEWALK
Despite @ArlingtonVA laws prohibiting this behavior, I came across this car that had just been parked on the sidewalk at Gateway Park pic.twitter.com/UYrDwnxWos— Bilsko (@Bilsko) October 31, 2017
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:03 (eight years ago)
^ Shocking proof that Gorka is not as angelic as we thought he was!
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:07 (eight years ago)
hey miners, i have also have a profession that is vanishing out of existence. suck it up and adjust.
xxp
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:09 (eight years ago)
AN INSIDE SOURCE JUST TOLD ME MUELLER IS CHARGING GORKA WITH OBSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALK. STRATEGY IS TO TURN HIM AND GET HIM TO GIVE UP OTHERS. #THERESISTANCE
― IF (Terrorist) Yes, Explain (man alive), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:10 (eight years ago)
Energy Secretary Rick Perry recently released a proposal aimed at saving coal from cheap renewable energy
so much for a free market economy
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:10 (eight years ago)
That Reuters article is grim. Why the fuck is a job training center offering a coal mining course?
― I cannit beleve how stupid yoy all r (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:11 (eight years ago)
to go along with the shoe cobbling courses
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:13 (eight years ago)
Hellow job center, I would like a job selling black and white televisions, show me how
― I cannit beleve how stupid yoy all r (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:13 (eight years ago)
doubling down
President Bush, in a moment of national tragedy, understood the meaning of his high office & sought to bring our country together.— Chuck Schumer (@SenSchumer) November 1, 2017
buckle up for 8 years thx to shitbags like this
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:14 (eight years ago)
I kinda have to say... fuck these morons (re: recalcitrant former coal miners)
xp
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:14 (eight years ago)
hmm
https://www.nationaljournal.com/s/660094?unlock=MYK56MKQA8DVOT86
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:32 (eight years ago)
First, a newly released batch of Morning Consult polls testing senators’ popularity is showing that three of the most vulnerable Democratic senators—North Dakota’s Heidi Heitkamp, West Virginia’s Joe Manchin, and Montana’s Jon Tester—hold job-approval ratings above 50 percent, while the one swing-state GOP senator up for reelection (Nevada’s Dean Heller) has an approval rating among the lowest in the Senate. Among all Democratic senators up in 2018, only Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri is in truly precarious territory (with 42 percent approving, 39 percent disapproving).Second, Democrats hold an imposing fundraising advantage. All 10 red-state Democrats banked over $3 million in their campaign accounts at the end of the quarter ending in September—with seven topping the $5 million mark. Not a single Republican challenger raised $1 million—something of a Mendoza line for Senate fundraising. Heller was outraised by Democratic challenger Jacky Rosen. Even Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and Alabama nominee Roy Moore were outraised by long-shot Democratic opponents.
Second, Democrats hold an imposing fundraising advantage. All 10 red-state Democrats banked over $3 million in their campaign accounts at the end of the quarter ending in September—with seven topping the $5 million mark. Not a single Republican challenger raised $1 million—something of a Mendoza line for Senate fundraising. Heller was outraised by Democratic challenger Jacky Rosen. Even Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and Alabama nominee Roy Moore were outraised by long-shot Democratic opponents.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:33 (eight years ago)
https://thinkprogress.org/papadopoulos-plea-includes-more-evidence-that-sessions-lied-under-oath-05fc02506be9/
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:35 (eight years ago)
of course he lied under oath. there will be no consequences for that, however. that's not something Mueller will bring charges on, it's something the Senate has the purview to pursue.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:43 (eight years ago)
i still can't get over that he drives a mustang
― Universal LULU Nation (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:49 (eight years ago)
you were expecting one of those little Shriner cars?
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:50 (eight years ago)
SCOOP:Trump wants to name tax bill “The Cut Cut Cut Act” but Hill leaders disagree <24 hrs out name still undecided https://t.co/GsEuylUdj9— Tara Palmeri (@tarapalmeri) November 1, 2017
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:52 (eight years ago)
lol whut
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:52 (eight years ago)
the bill so good they named it thrice
― proton, neutron, electron and crouton (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:52 (eight years ago)
No. Stop. Seriously, stop it.
― I cannit beleve how stupid yoy all r (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:53 (eight years ago)
“The Cut Cut Cut Act”
Trump certainly understands his voters.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:54 (eight years ago)
House GOP bill reportedly will now keep top income tax rate as is. Missed their deadline for releasing the bill, however...
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:54 (eight years ago)
if this top news would have come out yesterday it there'd definitely be at least three repeating words in this thread title
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:54 (eight years ago)
Still, behind closed doors, there has been back-and-forth between House Speaker Paul Ryan, and House Ways and Means chairman Kevin Brady about the naming of the bill, including multiple phone calls in the past week.Ryan initially kicked the naming over to Trump because of his penchant towards branding, according to a senior Hill aide.Ryan and Brady have pushed back on the naming of the bill. However, Trump has held firm.Trump has been insistent that the bill be called “The Cut Cut Cut Act.”
Ryan initially kicked the naming over to Trump because of his penchant towards branding, according to a senior Hill aide.
Ryan and Brady have pushed back on the naming of the bill. However, Trump has held firm.
Trump has been insistent that the bill be called “The Cut Cut Cut Act.”
even the thing that trump is supposedly good at, he is bad at
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:56 (eight years ago)
cut cut cut
cut your taxes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l3fZuW-aJsg
― proton, neutron, electron and crouton (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:56 (eight years ago)
I find myself thinking more and more of the alternate universe where the unmoneyed Trump is in the nursing home where he belongs.
― I cannit beleve how stupid yoy all r (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:58 (eight years ago)
Kevin B is on the cut
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3nfj4Y9WdUQ
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:58 (eight years ago)
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, November 1, 2017 11:50 AM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
no it's just mustangs are like...i dunno...seem like such a "this is a used car that a 16 year dude saves up for because it's 'cool'" just fits his kinda sad macho wannabe thing
― Universal LULU Nation (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:59 (eight years ago)
The QVC president
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 16:59 (eight years ago)
wonder if he's subconsciously influenced by the recent republican primary when a pizza magnate introduced his "9-9-9" tax proposal and captivated a nation
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:00 (eight years ago)
Even Sarah Palin would be embarrassed by that name.
― nickn, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:00 (eight years ago)
I doubt that.
― WilliamC, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:05 (eight years ago)
This past year all makes so much more sense if you assume that Trump has been trying really hard to look like a dipshit so that they'll just make him stop being president without forcing him to resign like a loser. It's a more believable narrative than the sad reality of the situation.
― I cannit beleve how stupid yoy all r (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:06 (eight years ago)
xpShe'd name it the "Cut Baby Cut" Act.
― nickn, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:07 (eight years ago)
dude is an excellent salesman, one of the best. This should really call it the cut cut cut Act.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:08 (eight years ago)
alternate suggestions:
- Cut Us Some Slack Act- Is Trump Gonna Have to Cut a Bitch Act- Cut MAGA covfefe @$T
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:12 (eight years ago)
or Cut Cut Goose, and that is how they can determine who actually gets the cuts, too.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:13 (eight years ago)
lol cut cut goose
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:15 (eight years ago)
guess who said it?
“We need quick justice and we need strong justice. Much quicker and much stronger than we have right now, because what we have right now is a joke, and it’s a laughingstock,” he continued. “No wonder so much of this stuff takes place. And I think I can speak for plenty of other countries too that are in the same situation.”
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:17 (eight years ago)
http://www.jesusjonesarchive.info/1990/90bandpic2.jpgCut, cut, cutAll the taaaxesIt's a fact, it's time to act!
― I cannit beleve how stupid yoy all r (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:20 (eight years ago)
DiBlasio
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:21 (eight years ago)
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/11/the-west-wing-trump-is-apoplectic-as-allies-fear-impeachment
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:26 (eight years ago)
All sorts of fun in that one.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:29 (eight years ago)
xpShe'd name it the "Cut Baby Cut" Act.― nickn, Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:07 PM (twenty-three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― nickn, Wednesday, November 1, 2017 5:07 PM (twenty-three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I prefer the K7 verison
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbd2PBO3k6w
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:31 (eight years ago)
This thread needs a stupid pun or obnoxious quote in its title. It's too hard to find in the list of updated threads right now.
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:31 (eight years ago)
agree that generic title started by a Britisher is unacceptable
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:32 (eight years ago)
is there a uk flag emoji we could edit in
― brimstead, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:32 (eight years ago)
cut cut gray cut
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:33 (eight years ago)
good luck usa
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:37 (eight years ago)
dammit Mookie beat me to it
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:38 (eight years ago)
I'm going to start the December thread and it's going to be called 'USA Politik + Præsident Trump December 2017'. That way I'll have finished my ban right in time for the end of year nominations.
― Frederik B, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:40 (eight years ago)
brewster's billions
― j., Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:42 (eight years ago)
― proton, neutron, electron and crouton (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:43 (eight years ago)
“One thing Steve wants Trump to do is take this more seriously,” the Bannon confidant told me. “Stop joking around. Stop tweeting.”
Has anyone tried using the magic word, maybe that's the trick.
― I cannit beleve how stupid yoy all r (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:43 (eight years ago)
this is the day trump became president
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:44 (eight years ago)
In a series of phone calls with Trump on Monday and Tuesday, Bannon told the president ...
So how is Bannon's role outside the WH any different than it was in the WH? Less oversight?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:45 (eight years ago)
Different couch to sit on.
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:49 (eight years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n25t31IBgeE
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:49 (eight years ago)
looks like Two Scoops is fucking up the House tax bill some more, tweeting about how it should include a repeal of the individual mandate for Obamacare lol
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:51 (eight years ago)
Meanwhile there was a document dump today of thousands of files related to the Navy SEAL raid that killed bin Laden and, well . . .
One of the files in the CIA document dump from Osama bin Laden’s compound: “YouTube_-_funy_cats.flv” https://t.co/p7mrQHN1u6 pic.twitter.com/S1Gf7I869F— Josh Billinson (@jbillinson) November 1, 2017
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:53 (eight years ago)
it's President Clinton's fault for selling us up the river on a raft of uranium
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:53 (eight years ago)
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:55 (eight years ago)
“YOU CAN’T GO ANY LOWER”: INSIDE THE WEST WING, TRUMP IS APOPLECTIC AS ALLIES FEAR IMPEACHMENT
lol headline NOT otm
we can and will go much lower
― Universal LULU Nation (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 17:59 (eight years ago)
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/11/the-west-wing-trump-is-a-poopyhead-as-allies-fear-impeachment
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:00 (eight years ago)
Now, see, this is a thread title!
Headline refers to his approval ratings not the moral state of the nation
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:01 (eight years ago)
But yes that is wrong too
The thought of a special prosecutor investigating Clinton, Mueller and Rosenstein while Mueller and Rosenstein are investigating Trump is pretty dark.
― IF (Terrorist) Yes, Explain (man alive), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:02 (eight years ago)
that scenario is p fucked up and yet makes perfect sense, I can see Trump going for it.
but who appoints the special prosecutor in this hypothetical scenario, Sessions?
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:04 (eight years ago)
YouTube_-_funy_cats.flv
― YouTube_-_funy_cats.flv (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:04 (eight years ago)
re: thread title... feels weirdly appropriate since Weinstein & avalanche of other predators being outed pushed Trump out of top of the news for the longest stretch of time since the election.
― flappy bird, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:26 (eight years ago)
karl thank u for posting my fav space ghost clip
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:27 (eight years ago)
“Jared is the worst political adviser in the White House in modern history,” Nunberg said. “I’m only saying publicly what everyone says behind the scenes at Fox News, in conservative media, and the Senate and Congress.”
lmao Jared rules
― frogbs, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:28 (eight years ago)
I honestly can't imagine that Trump's approval ratings could go any lower. Yes, he's said and done one stupid thing after another for the past year (and then also for decades as a public figure), but I'm pretty sure that's over now, don't you?
― I cannit beleve how stupid yoy all r (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:29 (eight years ago)
xpost it only gets better with time! hahaha
it's really funny, though, to imagine the "cut cut cut" debate happening in the midst of the atmosphere described in the vanity fair piece
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:29 (eight years ago)
I would imagine mounting scandal + a failure to pass tax reform would probably shudder off most of the remaining non-Pepes
― frogbs, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:30 (eight years ago)
Yeah, business as usual, but nonetheless it is pretty audacious for Trump's lawyers to reportedly argue in court re: the ongoing defamation lawsuit that him referring to his accusers as "liars" was just a political opinion.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:31 (eight years ago)
i can't access those abottabad files :(
― global tetrahedron, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:32 (eight years ago)
just feeling a little silly at the moment but seriously, imagine the shot of a random white house aide's face after watching a tense discussion of regarding the mueller investigation gradually morph into an equally tense debate about why it should or should not be called the cut cut cut plan
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:32 (eight years ago)
Trump administration is death by a thousand cut cut cuts.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:32 (eight years ago)
YouTube_-_funy_cuts.flv
― Terry Micawber (Tom D.), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:34 (eight years ago)
it's hard to say what his floor is at this point, there's been a slow but steady erosion in overall GOP support but that's gonna bottom out at some point and whether it's 25% or 30% who can say. We are definitely going to find out sad lol.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:37 (eight years ago)
Would've been wiser to name it the Measure Twice, Cut Once Bill.
― Moodles, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:39 (eight years ago)
Cut Hillary Dems Fake News Bill
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:39 (eight years ago)
If he fellated Steve Bannon while strangling a kitten on camera, his approval rating miiiiight fall to like 20%.
― I cannit beleve how stupid yoy all r (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:45 (eight years ago)
no it would have to be him fucking a kid, and not a 16-year-old. Shooting someone on 5th Ave. would make his numbers go up. also praising Allah, but I'm trying to be realistic here
― flappy bird, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:46 (eight years ago)
if something like that came out they'd just say it's fake. the technology for that is getting there xp
https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/robotics/artificial-intelligence/ai-creates-fake-obama
― global tetrahedron, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:47 (eight years ago)
GOP is totally fine w kid fuckers tbh
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:47 (eight years ago)
Time for carpet_kaiser to make an entrance.
― Terry Micawber (Tom D.), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:47 (eight years ago)
Sunday, October 29, 2017 10:33 AM Site carpet_kaiser has been banned permanently. 51'd
― sleeve, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:48 (eight years ago)
yeah but video, shakey?
― flappy bird, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:48 (eight years ago)
eh you're probably right lol
― flappy bird, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:49 (eight years ago)
just as the tension became nearly unbearable, trump suddenly stood and stared down at paul ryan in the chair across the desk. "cut cut cut cut cut cut plan. six cuts. double down." he was unraveling in front of our very eyes
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:50 (eight years ago)
Ryan will unveil the tax plan in a press conference where he keeps saying the word 'cut' over and over, occasionally looking off-stage to see Donald Trump nodding and mouthing 'again'.
― I cannit beleve how stupid yoy all r (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:56 (eight years ago)
I thought the thread title would be along the lines of "Presideent Trtump was rermarkably stgroing in hius joint press event with Sen McConnell"
― akm, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 18:59 (eight years ago)
feeling vindicated here
― imago, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 19:01 (eight years ago)
Funy cats, never to early: November 2017 US Politics
― Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 19:02 (eight years ago)
xxp SO DID I
― j., Wednesday, 1 November 2017 19:04 (eight years ago)
enemies of the working people
http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/42431-meet-trump-s-anti-worker-labor-department-nominees
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 19:06 (eight years ago)
Anti-worker Labor Department nominees?! But...but that doesn't make any sense! It's like putting someone who hates ice cream in charge of the Sweet Treats Department! Someone needs to have a talk with Mr. Trump about this.
― I cannit beleve how stupid yoy all r (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 19:14 (eight years ago)
Still waiting for him to introduce Surgeon General Petri Dish of Ebola.
― I cannit beleve how stupid yoy all r (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 19:15 (eight years ago)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/4a/Talk_Talk_Talk_%28The_Psychedelic_Furs_album_-_cover_art%29.jpg
― Careful with that Ax, Emanuel (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 19:27 (eight years ago)
(it was that or pink floyd the final cut cut cut)
We'll know Trump's in danger when Fox moves from "collusion isn't illegal" to "people who don't collude with foreign countries hate America"— Jon Schwarz (@schwarz) November 1, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 19:30 (eight years ago)
What is collusion ultimately but cooperation and friendship? You aren't against America having friends, are you? Because that sounds like something an enemy of America would want.
― I cannit beleve how stupid yoy all r (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 19:32 (eight years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNklvOXXkAEXtdN.jpg:small
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 20:18 (eight years ago)
i think Jared is aging faster than Trump
― drejelire, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 20:20 (eight years ago)
missed opportunity to court the emo vote by calling it the One Armed Scissor act
― Simon H., Wednesday, 1 November 2017 20:25 (eight years ago)
Hated is aging faster because his father in law is hot old mayonnaise.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 20:45 (eight years ago)
Uh Jared
Alfred man your phone knows what's what, don't correct it.
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 20:46 (eight years ago)
fucking phone should work for The Plum Line.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 20:54 (eight years ago)
ok on second thought, here:
https://i.imgur.com/NvyEy4X.jpg
― Careful with that Ax, Emanuel (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 21:08 (eight years ago)
on the fence but not to offendcut, cut, cut cut
― Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 21:17 (eight years ago)
the blatant lies from sarah sanders today* in the face of obvious evidence to the contrary remind me of the first few days of the administration when spicer was a entity and he was clearly lying about the stupid inauguration crowd estimate size. i remember following along and being kind of stunned that they would lie so plainly and blankly. heavy orwellian vibes. it's a shame everyone's computer monitors are pretty crisp these days, because this era of footage deserves the retrofuture dystopian CRT monitor look
*trump: "We need quick justice and we need strong justice — much quicker and much stronger than we have right now. Because what we have right now is a joke and it’s a laughingstock. And no wonder so much of this stuff takes place. And I think I can speak for plenty of other countries, too, that are in the same situation."
Acosta: he called the US Justice system a 'joke and a laughingstock' during his commentsSanders: that's not what he said. he said that process, that process has people calling us a joke and calling us a laughingstock.
that's not what he said. i mean, one one level this is all so fucking stupid, but on another, that's not what he said and it's insulting to be lied to like that
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 21:27 (eight years ago)
spicer was a new entity
my typos are out of control today, sry
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/01/us/politics/trump-russia-charges.html
don't worry guys, at least Trump is feelin' good
― frogbs, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 21:28 (eight years ago)
He also pushed back against a report published Monday night by The Washington Post, which the president said described him as “angry at everybody.”“I’m actually not angry at anybody,” Mr. Trump told The Times.
― proton, neutron, electron and crouton (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 21:31 (eight years ago)
and another thing: im not mad. please dont put in the newspaper that i got mad.— wint (@dril) December 29, 2014
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 21:35 (eight years ago)
"Pointing to the indictment of his former campaign chief, Paul Manafort, the president said, “And even if you look at that, there’s not even a mention of Trump in there.”“It has nothing to do with us,” Mr. Trump said."
“It has nothing to do with us,” Mr. Trump said."
i feel like this points to why he got so obsessively enraged with comey after he found out that he might be subject to investigation. because he felt like comey had promised him that he would NOT be under investigation. he seemed particularly betrayed by the idea that comey had lied to him about that. but doesn't it seem so plausible that maybe comey said "you are not under investigation...at this time.", to which trump replied "so you're saying i'm not under investigation?", then Comey said "...at this time", and then trump nodded and thought "ha...got him!"? he just kind of doesn't get things
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 21:36 (eight years ago)
that what's so irritating about this administration; they lie about the dumbest things on the planet, and even when confronted with concrete evidence of their dishonesty they just stare at you and say "how DARE you question the President of the United States of America like that?"... it's definitely Orwellian, but in the dumbest possible way
― frogbs, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 21:38 (eight years ago)
Huckster-Sanders is a fine analog to Ron Ziegler (Nixon's p.s.) in this respect
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 21:43 (eight years ago)
During the campaign he told us that someone who was under investigation by the FBI isn't fit to be president. Like 14 times.
― Careful with that Ax, Emanuel (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 21:45 (eight years ago)
now's a little late to be concerned about appearing to be a hypocrite based on things you said during the campaign
this is 100% him not liking negative press coverage and probably 0% him actually caring about his staff potentially committing treason
― frogbs, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 21:48 (eight years ago)
it's definitely Orwellian, but in the dumbest possible way
which is reassuring in a strange way, their utter incompetence blunts the fascistic attitude. I remember being legitimately freaked out by that first Spicer press conference - but it quickly became clear how silly they all were/are. makes things easier to deal with for sure.
― flappy bird, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 21:48 (eight years ago)
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, November 1, 2017 4:36 PM (sixteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Yes, it's like someone being told that they aren't under arrest for a particular crime and thinking that they now have immunity from ever being arrested again. Because double jeopardy and I plead the fifth! Sad!
― I cannit beleve how stupid yoy all r (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 21:58 (eight years ago)
I don't find it reassuring, this gives future politicians the green light to continue the same behavior after Trump and team are long gone.
― Moodles, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 22:00 (eight years ago)
if trump were born a working class man, the last thing we'd ever heard from him would be him whining "but i asked him if he was a cop and he said he wasn't! if you ask a cop if they're a cop they have to tell you the truth, it's in the consti-*policecar door slams*
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 22:02 (eight years ago)
xp yeah it's still horrible but it's relatively reassuring opposed to a competent fascist administration. but the longterm implications are obviously dire, yeah
― flappy bird, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 22:05 (eight years ago)
it is kind of amusing that we live under a fascist regime whose only goal is making Trump look like the bestest most smartest President ever
― frogbs, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 22:08 (eight years ago)
a fascist regime whose only goal is making Trump look like the bestest most smartest President ever
Well, tbf, it also wants to wholly subvert or corrupt the departments of Justice, State, Interior, Education, HHS, HUD, Energy, & the EPA.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 22:14 (eight years ago)
This is all bound to continue under more competent leadership in the future, and we will be thankful because we won't be contending with constant threats of nuclear war and insufficiently masked white supremacy.
― Moodles, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 22:21 (eight years ago)
we will be thankful because we won't be contending with constant threats of... insufficiently masked white supremacy.
true for limited values of "we"
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 22:25 (eight years ago)
did anyone watch the techie grilling?
"Can you please explain the difference between a bot and a troll?" -- a real sentence asked by a real congressman— ಠ_ಠ (@MikeIsaac) November 1, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 22:28 (eight years ago)
"Hello darkness, my old friend..."
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 23:33 (eight years ago)
Incredible photo
― flappy bird, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 23:34 (eight years ago)
https://carboncostume.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Killer-BOB.jpg
― nickn, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 23:35 (eight years ago)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8ClF26pN3Uw/maxresdefault.jpg
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 23:38 (eight years ago)
would totally bookmark a thread of photos of trump sidekicks realising they have made a huge mistake, while trump rages in the foreground (preferably out of focus)
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 23:39 (eight years ago)
http://www.trbimg.com/img-583e41c3/turbine/ct-donald-trump-secretary-of-state-mitt-romney-20161129
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 November 2017 23:40 (eight years ago)
https://timedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/president-donald-trump-paul-ryan-gop.jpg?quality=85
― drejelire, Wednesday, 1 November 2017 23:46 (eight years ago)
yeah that's the fuckin stuff
― j., Thursday, 2 November 2017 00:08 (eight years ago)
https://i.imgur.com/Ie5Q3my.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/ZCF4Y63.jpg
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 2 November 2017 00:09 (eight years ago)
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/11/the-wall-street-journal-editorial-board-coverage-of-mueller/amp
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 00:14 (eight years ago)
But of course
New from us: Michael Flynn Followed Five Russian Troll Accounts, Pushed Their Messages in Days Before the Electionhttps://t.co/GlpDIX7n6w— Ben Collins (@oneunderscore__) November 2, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 01:19 (eight years ago)
Game 7 is a snoozer. You should read about Betsy DeVos adjusting from impactful outsider to ineffectual bureaucrat. https://t.co/IhoXdcG2n5 pic.twitter.com/ugdEeAsUa2— Tim Alberta (@TimAlberta) November 2, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 2 November 2017 02:20 (eight years ago)
also what is going on with this tax plan?
They’re gonna revive the secret-bill strategy, but for raising your taxes to finance enormous tax cuts for the rich. https://t.co/Jk4KZDHM9J pic.twitter.com/9DOCfyFphv— Brian Beutler (@brianbeutler) November 1, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 2 November 2017 02:44 (eight years ago)
I'm starting to get the feeling these people may not have our best interests at heart
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Thursday, 2 November 2017 02:46 (eight years ago)
Who knows exactly what is up with the tax cut shit - no one has seen anything - but it seems at least as confused. confusing and challenging as ACA repeal. They've got their slim margin to begin with, but there already appears to be several in the GOP with issues and concerns they want addressed. Some states want property tax deduction, some don't. Trump wants permanent corporate tax reduction, others think it should be gradually phased out. Trump floated ACA repeal as part of it, others said no. And so on. And that's before it's even released and dissected, not just from Dems but from everyone. Add to that Cohn saying he wants it by Friday, before Trump leaves for Asia, not to mention that they have 10 days before Thanksgiving break to juggle objections, constituencies, push-back and who knows what the fuck Trump will say about it, and it seems like a real uphill battle.
Which isn't to say it won't pass, but at least as much as the ACA repeal many in the GOP seems to recognize this as a total shit-burger that no one wants to eat.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 03:27 (eight years ago)
https://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/img/mt/2017/10/RTS1HUT5/lead_960.jpg?1509481097
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 2 November 2017 03:36 (eight years ago)
What if there were just one brave republican that was brave enough to eat the shitburger
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 2 November 2017 04:03 (eight years ago)
what is going on with this tax plan?
The Republicans passed massive tax cuts for the rich in 2001 under GW Bush and when those cuts were set to expire during Obama's first term, they just ran around screaming "the Democrats want to raise income taxes" to anyone stupid enough to listen. It worked.
They learned a valuable lesson which they are all set to apply again to anew round of massive tax cuts for the rich.
― A is for (Aimless), Thursday, 2 November 2017 04:08 (eight years ago)
The Politico article mentions in passing some of the real damage DeVos is doing:
Already since taking office, DeVos’ department has deregulated the for-profit college industry that was targeted by Obama for its abuses and lack of accountability; revised the rule for defrauded students to gain loan forgiveness; attempted to consolidate all student loans under one servicing company, a plan she later abandoned; and, most notably, rescinded the Obama-era guidance on Title IX as it pertained to sexual assault cases on campus.
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 2 November 2017 08:44 (eight years ago)
at 8:00am our fucking president is screaming "death penalty" over the internet . i hate this so much
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 2 November 2017 12:49 (eight years ago)
luv2tweet about ongoing legal proceedings
― proton, neutron, electron and crouton (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 2 November 2017 12:51 (eight years ago)
Can't wait till "Do you follow Donald Trump on Twitter?" becomes a question defense attorneys ask to disqualify jurors. ("Do you watch Fox News?" already should be.)
― grawlix (unperson), Thursday, 2 November 2017 12:54 (eight years ago)
Couldn't happen to a nicer guy
http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/02/politics/sam-clovis-department-of-agriculture/index.html
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 13:11 (eight years ago)
As for the 400 lb guy in Jersey
https://www.wsj.com/articles/prosecutors-consider-bringing-charges-in-dnc-hacking-case-1509618203
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 13:12 (eight years ago)
Re: Clovis, is says a lot that it takes possible collusion with a foreign power to derail his nom for chief scientist of the department of agriculture, and not the fact that he lacks any scientific background.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 13:35 (eight years ago)
Rick Perry suggests fossil fuels help prevent sexual assault https://t.co/tLVOJd2DGY pic.twitter.com/kjurODSy8y— The Hill (@thehill) November 2, 2017
― mookieproof, Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:09 (eight years ago)
unexpected source!
Former interim Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Donna Brazile claims Hillary Clinton secretly took over the DNC before she had won the Democratic primary.
In an excerpt from her new book published by Politico, Brazile said she promised Clinton’s opponent, Bernie Sanders, that she would get to the bottom of whether Clinton had “rigged the nomination process.” She wrote, “By September 7, the day I called Bernie, I had found my proof and it broke my heart.”
Brazile describes a fundraising agreement between the Hillary Victory Fund, Hillary for America, and the DNC that stipulated that Hillary would control the “party’s finances, strategy, and all the money raised” in exchange for Clinton raising money and investing in the DNC. It was signed long before Clinton became the nominee.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/donna-brazile-i-found-proof-that-hillary-rigged-the-race-against-bernie
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:14 (eight years ago)
that is some beyond-galaxy-brain shit xp
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNoKk5nXcAAVlxI.jpg
― proton, neutron, electron and crouton (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:15 (eight years ago)
Re: Perry, I guess when Trump sets the stupidity bar so high, you really have to launch over that fucker if you wanna make the stupidest public statement of any given day.
― Evening Shade and Designing Women will not be seen tonight (Old Lunch), Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:17 (eight years ago)
Morbs I already links that on the Dems thread, this one is only for "he's orange!" jokes and breathless dot-connecting
― Simon H., Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:17 (eight years ago)
please don't say 'launch over that fucker' about the guy who looks after the usa's nuclear arsenal, i'm nervous enough as it is xp
― proton, neutron, electron and crouton (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:28 (eight years ago)
when was the last time someone mentioned Trump's orange skin on this thread
― frogbs, Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:33 (eight years ago)
I think he looks less orange recently
― Treeship, Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:33 (eight years ago)
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/01/fashion/trump-official-portrait.html
Instead, it depicts Mr. Trump in front of the de rigueur American flag, in a navy suit with flag pin, white shirt, patterned blue tie — and big grin. The orange glow has been toned down, but it is the smile that really sticks out. It almost looks as if he’s being tickled. The word chortle comes to mind.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:41 (eight years ago)
It’s better than most of his other portrait photos where he looks like he’s shitting his pants
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:45 (eight years ago)
The official portrait makes him look like he just shit his pants on purpose.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:48 (eight years ago)
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, November 2, 2017 9:45 AM (two minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
The crazy thing is that you can tell he practiced that shitting face in the mirror a lot, so it's obviously what he thinks is his best photo face.
― IF (Terrorist) Yes, Explain (man alive), Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:49 (eight years ago)
most photos of trump in the white house have him looking whiter, paler, more washed out overall. I sort of wondered if there was a conscious decision made that this made him look presidential or something.
― chinavision!, Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:50 (eight years ago)
like it's a distinct change in appearance post-campaign
― chinavision!, Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:51 (eight years ago)
That is the least convincing imitation of a human smile I've ever seen.
― grawlix (unperson), Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:53 (eight years ago)
xpost Well he's been stuck in an office most of the day.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:53 (eight years ago)
maybe just no more time for the tanning bed/spray tan
― chinavision!, Thursday, 2 November 2017 14:55 (eight years ago)
Plenty of time to eat tho. His face and head are bigger than ever.
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 2 November 2017 15:06 (eight years ago)
I thought about that Deadspin article detailing Trump's hair guy who essentially had moved in next to him at Trump Tower, and how he'd have to get "topped off" every couple weeks or so...what happened to that? Did he just move the guy to Mar-a-Lago, knowing he would be there every single weekend?
― frogbs, Thursday, 2 November 2017 15:07 (eight years ago)
Clovis is out - he's withdrawn his nomination.
― grawlix (unperson), Thursday, 2 November 2017 15:09 (eight years ago)
gonna be quite the challenge to find another nominee as uniquely unqualified as he was, trump's gonna have to raise his game
― proton, neutron, electron and crouton (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 2 November 2017 15:16 (eight years ago)
Goo goo ga joob
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 2 November 2017 15:17 (eight years ago)
mourning!
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 2 November 2017 15:26 (eight years ago)
robert mercer:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNowMPdW0AATyKO.jpg:small
― mookieproof, Thursday, 2 November 2017 15:26 (eight years ago)
gee thx dad
― proton, neutron, electron and crouton (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 2 November 2017 15:27 (eight years ago)
imagine being so tight with milo that it takes 'several weeks' to sever ties with him
― proton, neutron, electron and crouton (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 2 November 2017 15:28 (eight years ago)
I'm trying to remember if I've heard anything about a vigilante who goes around poisoning farm animals and doing donuts in cornfields, because I think that might be our Ag Man.
― Evening Shade and Designing Women will not be seen tonight (Old Lunch), Thursday, 2 November 2017 15:29 (eight years ago)
"society will struggle to distinguish the signal of truth from the correlated noise of conformity"
☝️ this is someone who gets his reading suggestions from SV VCs
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 2 November 2017 15:32 (eight years ago)
“Sam Clovis was almost a comically bad nominee, even for this administration.” -@SenatorLeahy pic.twitter.com/f5sMa0QiaY— Aaron Booth (@ActorAaronBooth) November 2, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 2 November 2017 15:51 (eight years ago)
The cabinet nomination process should just involve a parade of people putting their face through the hole of a giant picture of Calvin peeing on the department in question until they find the unctuous mug that best fits.
― Evening Shade and Designing Women will not be seen tonight (Old Lunch), Thursday, 2 November 2017 16:00 (eight years ago)
Old Lunch, your sense of humor helps me smile through otherwise painfully stupid shit like Trump appointees. ty
― the young, low level volunteer named (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 2 November 2017 16:08 (eight years ago)
plenty more tax plan analysis to come, but tweeter-in-chief will benefit from this
the text eliminates the alternative minimum tax, which is designed to hit higher-income earners
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 2 November 2017 16:12 (eight years ago)
xpost Thank you back. Finding a way to laugh at the horror is pretty much the only thing that keeps me from shutting down completely rn.
― Evening Shade and Designing Women will not be seen tonight (Old Lunch), Thursday, 2 November 2017 16:13 (eight years ago)
The proposal repeals an itemized deduction for medical expenses, a crucial provision to households with extraordinary health-care costs. It also repeals the tax credit for adoption and the deduction for student-loan interest.
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2017/11/republicans-double-down-on-screwing-blue-states-in-tax-bill/
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 2 November 2017 16:54 (eight years ago)
"We don't want people to get abortions but we also don't want people to adopt children that can't be raised by their birth parents." - the GOP
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Thursday, 2 November 2017 17:01 (eight years ago)
It's super-important that all babies be brought to term but once that's taken care of it's basically
http://memes.ucoz.com/_nw/25/96588251.jpg
― Evening Shade and Designing Women will not be seen tonight (Old Lunch), Thursday, 2 November 2017 17:09 (eight years ago)
Hmm...
http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/02/politics/jeff-sessions-congress-russia-trump-campaign/index.html
The notable part here is both Cornyn and Grassley making noises.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 17:29 (eight years ago)
they'll "look into it" and then accept His Keebler-ness's bullshit explanation, since he's such a good man dontchaknow
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 17:32 (eight years ago)
Likely, but the fact that they're even saying something is a shift.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 17:41 (eight years ago)
atm, seems like this tax bill should be the focus of attention & resistance, because they're going to try to rush it through as fast as possible, before anyone knows what hit them. I look forward to news reports that expose all the poison pills in it.
― A is for (Aimless), Thursday, 2 November 2017 18:11 (eight years ago)
*"Unborn"* children can now have 529s. This is new. No one has talked about this. pic.twitter.com/cM9Mt8kKZ6— Meghna Chakrabarti (@MeghnaWBUR) November 2, 2017
― mookieproof, Thursday, 2 November 2017 18:16 (eight years ago)
"a member of the species homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb"
― .oO (silby), Thursday, 2 November 2017 18:23 (eight years ago)
corporations are unborn children, my friend
― mookieproof, Thursday, 2 November 2017 18:27 (eight years ago)
what the everloving fuck
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 2 November 2017 18:55 (eight years ago)
March: I didn't have meetings w/ Russian intermediaries about campaignJuly: I didn't talk to Russians Late July: OopsNov: Double oops pic.twitter.com/nAhFbKkrEv— Lis Power (@LisPower1) November 2, 2017
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Thursday, 2 November 2017 18:59 (eight years ago)
49% of Americans believe Trump committed a crime re: Russia
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 19:04 (eight years ago)
"and 30% believe he was justified in doing so"
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 2 November 2017 19:08 (eight years ago)
nothing surprising here
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/11/02/winners-and-losers-in-the-gop-tax-plan/?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-high_tax-winnerslosers-230pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.c13776dfeed6
on the campaign trail, Trump said that hedge funds were “getting away with murder” on their taxes and that he would take away carried interest, the popular opening in the tax code these Wall Street titans use. But the bill does not change or eliminate carried interest, which is also used by some real estate developers.
The GOP preserves the earned-income tax credit, a popular refundable credit for the working class, but the bill does not expand it.
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 2 November 2017 19:16 (eight years ago)
So the other 51% believe Hilary Clinton committed a crime re: Russia? (xxp)
― Terry Micawber (Tom D.), Thursday, 2 November 2017 19:23 (eight years ago)
U.S. district court judge Amy Berman Jackson said President Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort could be a flight risk on Thursday as she mulled requests to loosen the conditions of his house arrest.
The judge set a bond hearing for Monday morning at 9:30 a.m. to discuss a request made by Manafort’s lawyers to remove a GPS monitoring system and to allow him to move more freely about.
“The charges are significant and his ties and assets abroad are significant so I have concerns about flight,” Berman said. Manafort is under house arrest with $10 million unsecured bond that would become due should he violate court orders or flee the country.
http://thehill.com/homenews/news/358476-judge-worried-manafort-could-pose-flight-risk
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 2 November 2017 19:29 (eight years ago)
dude has three passports
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 19:30 (eight years ago)
the whole bail bond system is a fucking joke fuck that shit
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 2 November 2017 19:40 (eight years ago)
i think he can fly
― correlated noise of conformity (Hunt3r), Thursday, 2 November 2017 19:57 (eight years ago)
whoever wrote this up for Franken did a good job:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/franken-blasts-sessions-papadopoulos-you-failed-to-tell-the-truth
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:03 (eight years ago)
Okay Hensarling announced he’s leaving yesterday, now Lamar Smith?
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:08 (eight years ago)
haha for real that's awesome
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:08 (eight years ago)
Sessions fuck ups are a good excuse for Trump to can him and get someone in there to fire Mueller, no?
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:10 (eight years ago)
Sessions is not the roadblock keeping Mueller from getting fired
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:11 (eight years ago)
Sessions is also the only member of Trump's cabinet delivering results
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:12 (eight years ago)
Sen. Al Franken (D-MN), whose questioning of Attorney General Jeff Sessions in his January confirmation hearing kicked off a chain of events that ultimately led to the appointment of a special counsel, on Thursday had some more pointed questions for Sessions.
wait is this true? Franken seems pretty legit.
― frogbs, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:13 (eight years ago)
well he should fire him anyways because fuck that guy
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:13 (eight years ago)
yes that is absolutely true, because Franken's questioning >>> Sessions recusal from investigation >>> Trump firing Comey >>> Mueller appointment
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:14 (eight years ago)
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:15 (eight years ago)
I think DeVos belongs here as well
― sleeve, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:15 (eight years ago)
tbf stupid ass sessions walked into it by adding some flavor to his answer that fucked him over even harder
Franken: "CNN just published a story alleging that the intelligence community provided documents to the president-elect last week that included information that quote, ‘Russian operatives claimed to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.’ These documents also allegedly say quote, ‘There was a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between Trump's surrogates and intermediaries for the Russian government.’"Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?"Sessions: "Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it."
"Now, again, I'm telling you this as it's coming out, so you know. But if it's true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?"
Sessions: "Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have — did not have communications with the Russians, and I'm unable to comment on it."
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:16 (eight years ago)
yeah it was a total unforced error
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:18 (eight years ago)
with Chaffetz, Hensarling, Smith + others leaving the GOP House caucus, Ryan's gonna be facing a serious "brain drain" of senior leadership + committee chairs, even if their seats are not at risk.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:29 (eight years ago)
that's what draining the swamp means
― frogbs, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:34 (eight years ago)
well if Trumpists take those seats it's more like pumping the swamp
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:37 (eight years ago)
full of Trump ooze
This is the state of the GOP leadership pipeline. In a decade, state legislatures will start filling up with Gamergaters, MRAs, /pol/ posters, Anime Nazis, and Proud Boys. These are, as of now, the only people in their age cohort becoming more active in Republican politics in the Trump era. Everyone else is fleeing. This will be the legacy of Trumpism: It won’t be long before voters who reflexively check the box labeled “Republican” because their parents did, or because they think their property taxes are too high, or because Fox made them scared of terrorism, start electing Pepe racists to Congress.
― mookieproof, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:38 (eight years ago)
I don't see that as a huge change tbh.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:39 (eight years ago)
yeah lol "start"
― Careful with that Ax, Emanuel (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:39 (eight years ago)
Ted Bilbo was a Senator
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:40 (eight years ago)
!
Trump campaign foreign policy advisor Carter Page has spent more than five hours behind closed doors w/ House Intel Cmte, w/o a lawyer.— Ben Siegel (@benyc) November 2, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:42 (eight years ago)
xpost I thought Bilbo was a hobbit thank you drive through.
did someone sayhttps://i.imgur.com/u0nX81d.jpg
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:43 (eight years ago)
believe me, I tried to think of a more appropriate term
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:44 (eight years ago)
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:44 (eight years ago)
Jeb Hensarling being dragged from his lair
https://images.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimages.sequart.org%2Fimages%2FStarship-Troopers-Brain-Bug-660x371.jpg&f=1
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:45 (eight years ago)
Fighting Baseball for Super Famicom: A League of Fake Americans POLL
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:46 (eight years ago)
Good god.
Now going on 6.5 hours and Page still there— Manu Raju (@mkraju) November 2, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:51 (eight years ago)
All the committee members stumble out, having been driven insane Lovecraft-style.
Page seems like an idiot who just enjoys attention, I kinda doubt anything significant will come out of his babbling
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:53 (eight years ago)
That Page guy is nuts. 6.5 hours? No lawyer? Does he know that he's essentially under oath, and anything wrong can be used against him? So better theory is that he is ... cooperating.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:53 (eight years ago)
Possible that one of them suggested a quick game of Catan before diving in to the questions
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:55 (eight years ago)
definitely think the best film that gets made about this administration is gonna be the one focusing on Carter Page
the day the indictments broke he appeared on Chris Hayes' show. meanwhile, on FOX, Tucker Carlson was interviewing the Dilbert guy. somehow that felt heavy with significance to me.
― frogbs, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:56 (eight years ago)
Does he know that he's essentially under oath, and anything wrong can be used against him?
He has a childlike but unwavering belief in his own innocence
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:56 (eight years ago)
a couple of visas
― Careful with that Ax, Emanuel (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:56 (eight years ago)
Page is so slimy I wouldn't be shocked if his trip to Russia in July or whenever was at the behest of the FBI. Considering that George Papasfritas had been tied up with the law for almost a year before anyone really knew, and Page is more high profile than that.
By the way, every time I hear "George Papadopoulos" I think of
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFqov8a9iL4
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:56 (eight years ago)
and a partridge in a pear tree
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:57 (eight years ago)
"but i signed the immunity agreement!""mr page, that was a lunch order..."
― correlated noise of conformity (Hunt3r), Thursday, 2 November 2017 20:58 (eight years ago)
dude has three passportsa couple of visasand a partridge in a pear tree
a couple of visasand a partridge in a pear tree
The correct answer was: "You don't even know my real name."
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:00 (eight years ago)
also the Senate can't bring criminal charges against Page, and aren't connected to Mueller, so odds of him getting in some trouble over this are low imo
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:00 (eight years ago)
That Page guy is nuts. 6.5 hours? No lawyer? Does he know that he's essentially under oath, and anything wrong can be used against him? So better theory is that he is ... cooperating.― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, November 2, 2017 8:53 PM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, November 2, 2017 8:53 PM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
page is pretty useless as a cooperator - only way they'd give him a deal is if he has irrefutable goods on someone that they can apply without him ever having to testify in court. can you imagine this fucking moron testifying and not getting lit on fire by a good lawyer?
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:02 (eight years ago)
well yeah but I cannot imagine the House Intel Committee spending a single minute more than they have to with this guy. lord knows what they're talking about in there.
― frogbs, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:03 (eight years ago)
"I DID IT I DID IT AND I'M GLAD I TELL YOU."
"...we only asked your name?"
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:04 (eight years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/vB7YUZw.gif
― drejelire, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:06 (eight years ago)
Yam just called the tax bill "a big beautiful Christmas present"
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:07 (eight years ago)
If that George guy is seriously in the mix, then it would be a mistake to underrate Page as somehow too stupid and useless to have played a role in this mess.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:09 (eight years ago)
I saw Page on Chris Hayes' show a few months ago. I've heard tamarind ducks talk that made more sense.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:10 (eight years ago)
That Clovis guy, he's talking, too! If we dismissed anyone in this thing as too stupid we wouldn't be left with anyone.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:11 (eight years ago)
idk the stupid and useless guys are often invaluable to investigations like these
― frogbs, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:14 (eight years ago)
Like these, aka, like Watergate.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:15 (eight years ago)
They have to be privvy to valuable info, is the thing
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:15 (eight years ago)
Valuable is a vague term. If they have proof that Trump, or Sessions, or anyone lied, that seems valuable enough. And that's not much, all things considered.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:16 (eight years ago)
GAH
Seven hours into Carter Page interview, Rep. Speier steps out and says “it’s gonna be awhile.”The transcript of this hearing will be wild.— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) November 2, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:17 (eight years ago)
xpost Like, the George dude, he's a low level schlub by any account, and he got busted for lying about emailing Russians. That's a lower standard than Sessions's and Flynn's and Kush's infractions.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:18 (eight years ago)
just remember, the guy at the top spilled highly classified information to the Russian ambassador in the Oval Office for literally no reason other than to brag. it would not surprise me if Page was just incidentally sitting on some sort of bombshell without really knowing it.
― frogbs, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:19 (eight years ago)
Everyone already knows Sessions lied. Trump lies on a daily basis. This is not prosecutable newd.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:20 (eight years ago)
News
Lol
I'm sorry, in ILX lore this will go down as "nude"
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:21 (eight years ago)
send newds
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:21 (eight years ago)
First images from Page meeting leaked:
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:22 (eight years ago)
Josh Marshall had some thoughts about Papadopoulos that could easily apply to Page and Clovis as well.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/wrestling-with-the-fact-that-papadopoulos-is-a-moron
― Moodles, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:22 (eight years ago)
https://i.pinimg.com/474x/f5/37/f7/f537f71d486f840f8fc1448e73a1a014--you-smile-simpsons.jpg
ha, xpost
The thing about this rogue's gallery of useful idiots is that they're exactly the kind of low-hanging fruit the Russians would try to exploit.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:24 (eight years ago)
Hmm
http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/02/politics/jared-kushner-robert-mueller-documents-russia-investigation/index.html
Jared Kushner has turned over documents in recent weeks to special counsel Robert Mueller as investigators have begun asking in witness interviews about Kushner's role in the firing of FBI Director James Comey, CNN has learned....Two separate sources told CNN that investigators have asked other witnesses about Kushner's role in firing Comey. Investigators have also asked about how a statement was issued in the name of Donald Trump Jr. regarding a Trump Tower meeting and about the circumstances surrounding the departures of other White House aides, according to one source.
Two separate sources told CNN that investigators have asked other witnesses about Kushner's role in firing Comey. Investigators have also asked about how a statement was issued in the name of Donald Trump Jr. regarding a Trump Tower meeting and about the circumstances surrounding the departures of other White House aides, according to one source.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:44 (eight years ago)
http://i0.wp.com/www.powerlineblog.com/ed-assets/2016/07/doonesbury.gif
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:48 (eight years ago)
GOOD GOD
Carter Page has invoked the 5th, on his own without a lawyer, regarding document production, says House Intel member Speier. Which documents? "Any documents," she tells me.— Billy House (@HouseInSession) November 2, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:48 (eight years ago)
what is even happening here
― sleeve, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:50 (eight years ago)
Lol ulysses
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:51 (eight years ago)
pleading the fifth on a jack chick comic
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:52 (eight years ago)
wild, wild stuff
― The Fortnightly Intruder (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:53 (eight years ago)
Forgive me if already postedhttp://abcnews.go.com/Politics/white-house-unaware-top-adviser-testified-grand-jury/story?id=50895265&cid=social_twitter_abcn
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 2 November 2017 21:59 (eight years ago)
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, November 2, 2017 5:00 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
maybe papadapolous *****is not even greek*******
― marcos, Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:02 (eight years ago)
xpost -- clown shoes all the way down!
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:08 (eight years ago)
hold up, did Carter page plead the fifth after 7 hours of being talked to? Or did he plead it at the start?
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:20 (eight years ago)
Fuck knows.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:28 (eight years ago)
if Don Jr could get indicted somehow I'd not be sad
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:28 (eight years ago)
he's a big dummy, but if he can't do it, no one can.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:30 (eight years ago)
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/02/carter-page-russia-probe-documents-244483
“I’m helping to the greatest extent I can,” Page told reporters after exiting his interview, which was held in a secure Capitol hearing room. The committee is slated to release a transcript of his testimony in three days at Page’s request.
Worth it for the photo:
https://static.politico.com/dims4/default/3a4bdd0/2147483647/resize/1160x/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2F86%2F6d%2F06bdbf494b19aa8a5c04f043ddd5%2F171102-page-getty-1160.jpg
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:38 (eight years ago)
If investigate committee mtgs go on long enough, do they wheel in a cart of diet cokes or monster drinks or something
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:39 (eight years ago)
carter page: history’s most hapless man?
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:41 (eight years ago)
Oh BTW this happened.
BREAKING: Judge Mehta orders DOJ to file briefs by Nov 13 addressing if tweets by @realDonaldTrump reflect official USG policy/views. #FOIA— Bradley P. Moss, Esq (@BradMossEsq) November 2, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:45 (eight years ago)
@realDonaldTrumpThis account doesn't existTry searching for another.
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:53 (eight years ago)
wtf
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:55 (eight years ago)
Omgggggggggg
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:55 (eight years ago)
thread title just got appropriate
― imago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:55 (eight years ago)
I couldn’t believe it was real
wait waht did that really just happen
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:56 (eight years ago)
maybe he finally listened to hillary
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:56 (eight years ago)
huge if true
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:56 (eight years ago)
can anyone just sign up for it now? i nominate karl malone to be our new president
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:57 (eight years ago)
hooooly fucking shit if this is not just some weird twitter hiccup/failure
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:57 (eight years ago)
yeah
― Dan S, Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:58 (eight years ago)
aw darn it's back :(
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 2 November 2017 23:00 (eight years ago)
don't worry it's just twitter being the pile of crap it always is
― .oO (silby), Thursday, 2 November 2017 23:00 (eight years ago)
a brief, beautiful glimpse of a better world
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 2 November 2017 23:01 (eight years ago)
the last five minutes are a fantastic case-study in [remainder of post redacted before trenchant social commentary thread can be activated]
― imago, Thursday, 2 November 2017 23:02 (eight years ago)
I don’t think I ever want to wake up again
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 2 November 2017 23:04 (eight years ago)
Well shit
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 2 November 2017 23:05 (eight years ago)
I like how every single twitter account just did the same 2 tweets
Trump's twitter account has gone¦It's back now
― cajunsunday, Thursday, 2 November 2017 23:09 (eight years ago)
a man can dream
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Thursday, 2 November 2017 23:10 (eight years ago)
Weird times man
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 2 November 2017 23:15 (eight years ago)
most peculiar momma
― Careful with that Ax, Emanuel (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 2 November 2017 23:25 (eight years ago)
Trump's account is probably running on its very own cluster in twitter's infrastructure
― .oO (silby), Thursday, 2 November 2017 23:28 (eight years ago)
Ohhhhh dear.
Former Trump adviser Carter Page privately testifies he told Sessions he was traveling to Russia during the campaign https://t.co/9edxNu54VT pic.twitter.com/JvUvkwLTxl— CNN (@CNN) November 2, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 23:41 (eight years ago)
https://lumiere-a.akamaihd.net/v1/images/lobot_0ee16719.jpeg?region=173%2C150%2C1540%2C770&width=480
― drejelire, Thursday, 2 November 2017 23:45 (eight years ago)
that's what i was looking for
― YouTube_-_funy_cats.flv (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Thursday, 2 November 2017 23:46 (eight years ago)
i nominate karl malone to be our new president
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, November 2, 2017 10:57 PM (fifty-one minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sogYgHlNnqo
― Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 2 November 2017 23:51 (eight years ago)
Yeah, about that.
"The saddest thing is that because I'm the president... I am not supposed to be involved w/ the Justice Dept." Trump today to @LarryOConnor— Robert Costa (@costareports) November 2, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 2 November 2017 23:52 (eight years ago)
I'm told a lot of people did not know about the separation of powers. Did you know that? There are separate powers! What a country.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 00:00 (eight years ago)
Earlier today @realdonaldtrump’s account was inadvertently deactivated due to human error by a Twitter employee. The account was down for 11 minutes, and has since been restored. We are continuing to investigate and are taking steps to prevent this from happening again.— Twitter Government (@TwitterGov) November 3, 2017
― Οὖτις, Friday, 3 November 2017 00:19 (eight years ago)
No, don't take steps! Encourage human error! Not sad!
― Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 3 November 2017 00:24 (eight years ago)
why are they trying to prevent it happening again? seems to me 11 minutes is a record that begs to be broken.
― A is for (Aimless), Friday, 3 November 2017 00:25 (eight years ago)
Ugh, this is what it's going to feel like when they manage to revive Trump after his inevitable coronary, isn't it?
― Evening Shade and Designing Women will not be seen tonight (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 00:35 (eight years ago)
God works in mysterious ways! Let go and let god!
― Evening Shade and Designing Women will not be seen tonight (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 00:36 (eight years ago)
stands to reason that human error took him off line, considering human error gave him the presidency.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 00:37 (eight years ago)
erect a statue of that twitter employee
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Friday, 3 November 2017 00:39 (eight years ago)
sitting on horseback with his finger poised over a delete button
― The Fortnightly Intruder (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Friday, 3 November 2017 00:45 (eight years ago)
Through our investigation we have learned that this was done by a Twitter customer support employee who did this on the employee’s last day. We are conducting a full internal review. https://t.co/mlarOgiaRF— Twitter Government (@TwitterGov) November 3, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 3 November 2017 02:08 (eight years ago)
I wanted a poem to be most eloquent take on the current US presidency but I didn't believe it was possible:
http://poemsandpoetics.blogspot.ca/2017/11/jerome-rothenberg-america2017-president.html
― pomenitul, Friday, 3 November 2017 02:11 (eight years ago)
Meanwhile, Trump's Gallup approval percentage -- which hit a new low of 33 on Sunday -- has climbed 5 points since the indictments.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Friday, 3 November 2017 02:28 (eight years ago)
Rude teens are saying “Hey man, what’s happening?” to John Kasich pic.twitter.com/LCVikVFaSU— Remembrance Day Name (@WindingDot) November 2, 2017
― j., Friday, 3 November 2017 02:29 (eight years ago)
rarely is the question asked, 'is our young people, like, cutting it'
― mookieproof, Friday, 3 November 2017 02:48 (eight years ago)
"Too many of our young people are like 'Hey, man, what's happening'."
^ Kasich using valley girl locution to disrespect young people who at least speak in standard English sentences.
― A is for (Aimless), Friday, 3 November 2017 03:24 (eight years ago)
my brotha
― j., Friday, 3 November 2017 03:44 (eight years ago)
Rerun was like “which Doobie you be, Kasich?”
― correlated noise of conformity (Hunt3r), Friday, 3 November 2017 03:45 (eight years ago)
I was relating to a friend the other day about the happiness displayed in the immediate wake of 'Covfefe' when we all thought Two Scoops had been felled by a cardiac episode on the toilet.
― to fly across the city and find Aerosmith's car (C. Grisso/McCain), Friday, 3 November 2017 04:03 (eight years ago)
Sadly these situations are what the 25th amendment is actually about not a soft coup.
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 3 November 2017 04:18 (eight years ago)
Rude teens are saying “Hey man, what’s happening?” to John Kasich
Heard this in the voice of the start of "Bitchin Camaro" by the Dead Milkmen.
― Stoop Crone (Trayce), Friday, 3 November 2017 05:44 (eight years ago)
"Trump rescued all the hurricane victims with a big fire truck and drove it up here from Puerto Rico.""You're kidding!""I must be, Puerto Rico is an island."
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Friday, 3 November 2017 06:21 (eight years ago)
it is absolutely, 100% us against them pic.twitter.com/a31Wvc0MyA— Brandy Jensen (@BrandyLJensen) November 2, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Friday, 3 November 2017 06:52 (eight years ago)
Guillotine's hungry, assholes.
― The Fortnightly Intruder (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Friday, 3 November 2017 07:01 (eight years ago)
Kasich demands a "what's poppin'" for his greetings.
― louise ck (milo z), Friday, 3 November 2017 07:36 (eight years ago)
My Twitter account was taken down for 11 minutes by a rogue employee. I guess the word must finally be getting out-and having an impact.— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 3, 2017
― The Fortnightly Intruder (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Friday, 3 November 2017 10:59 (eight years ago)
what the fuck is that supposed to mean
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 3 November 2017 11:04 (eight years ago)
I am assuming that whoever operates his Twitter has previously been hiding from him the fact that it gets any responses. "Sorry again Mr President, no real feedback, we'll try again tomorrow"
― Andrew Farrell, Friday, 3 November 2017 11:06 (eight years ago)
It means he's becoming so effective, so virile, that the fake news media are trying to silence him however they can, but he won't be stopped, because he is Trump Man
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 November 2017 11:09 (eight years ago)
twitter couldn't keep a lid on his tweets forever - this is going to blow the roof off the whole trump for president campaign
― Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Friday, 3 November 2017 11:19 (eight years ago)
that was the first of a few tweets whose thrust was "word's getting out that the real colluder is...CROOKED HILLARY"
― she carries a torch. two torches, actually (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Friday, 3 November 2017 11:30 (eight years ago)
What about the deleted E-mails, Uranium, Podesta, the Server, plus, plus...
Ladies and Gentlemen, the President of the United States.
― Andrew Farrell, Friday, 3 November 2017 11:32 (eight years ago)
....People are angry. At some point the Justice Department, and the FBI, must do what is right and proper. The American public deserves it!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 3, 2017
Um, DJT OTM?
― Evening Shade and Designing Women will not be seen tonight (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 11:50 (eight years ago)
Are people actually befuddled by that word must be getting out tweet? Doesnt he say shit like that all the time?
― President Keyes, Friday, 3 November 2017 12:18 (eight years ago)
I went up 2 points in the pollsThe message must be getting out etc
― President Keyes, Friday, 3 November 2017 12:19 (eight years ago)
he's much more likely to say shit like 'the fake news media won't tell you that the stock market is at a record high! iirc
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 3 November 2017 12:22 (eight years ago)
ISIS just claimed the Degenerate Animal who killed, and so badly wounded, the wonderful people on the West Side, was "their soldier." .....— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 3, 2017
...Based on that, the Military has hit ISIS "much harder" over the last two days. They will pay a big price for every attack on us!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 3, 2017
What is time? Time is of no consequence to us here, in hell.
― Andrew Farrell, Friday, 3 November 2017 12:24 (eight years ago)
cause THEN effect? not in trump's america, pal
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 3 November 2017 12:25 (eight years ago)
biggest attack on the West Side since Common released "The Bitch in You"
― President Keyes, Friday, 3 November 2017 12:40 (eight years ago)
"degenerate animal", nice, let's just go there shall we
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 November 2017 12:42 (eight years ago)
Everyone looks like a degenerate animal to a degenerate animal.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 12:52 (eight years ago)
This is grim, and I assume the thought's gone through everyone's mind anyway: what if it doesn't matter?
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/2/16588964/america-epistemic-crisis
― Andrew Farrell, Friday, 3 November 2017 13:08 (eight years ago)
Yeah, I think that without intense and sustained effort to turn this ship around, we're on a slow but certain journey into a new iteration of the Dark Ages.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 13:13 (eight years ago)
Once enough people have undertaken a campaign against consensus reality, there's really nowhere else to go.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 13:14 (eight years ago)
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, November 3, 2017 8:42 AM (thirty-nine minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
yea it is so gross
― marcos, Friday, 3 November 2017 13:22 (eight years ago)
And intense and sustained effort is being comprehensively pre-framed as "New World Order!"
― Andrew Farrell, Friday, 3 November 2017 13:23 (eight years ago)
the Vegas shooter's not degenerate tho, he's an interesting riddle to be cracked. fml
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 November 2017 13:25 (eight years ago)
The most depressing thought re: all the current goings-on and in particular "mainstream" GOP retirements is that the next few generations of GOP candidates (and therefore winners or obstructionists) may all be full-on Trump/Moore etc.deluded lunatics. That's what I don't get from the craven Ryan/Mitch myopic approach: clearly they see what is happening, right? Those guys are dicks, but they're not crazy, and I can't imagine they want a party of Roy Moores, either. I mean, the flip answer is "of course they do," but I don't know about that. We've made it so far over the Trump hump that I fear we have to wait till it all rolls around to the beginning again.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 13:37 (eight years ago)
I think they've mostly given up
― Moodles, Friday, 3 November 2017 13:39 (eight years ago)
Yeah, but in all seriousness, what does that mean?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 13:43 (eight years ago)
This is grim, and I assume the thought's gone through everyone's mind anyway: what if it doesn't matter?https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/2/16588964/america-epistemic-crisis🕸
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 3 November 2017 13:44 (eight years ago)
there will and must be a counterforce to that
― imago, Friday, 3 November 2017 13:45 (eight years ago)
On his face, though, in essence, is Trump any crazier than Reagan? More conservative than Reagan or his crew? I don't think so. It's just annoying/frightening to watch someone try to recapture that particular era of callous lunacy.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 13:46 (eight years ago)
yea I think the comments about the future of right wing media/politicians all being Gamergate/Cernovich types is pretty OTM, these are pretty much the only young Republicans that exist right now
― frogbs, Friday, 3 November 2017 13:48 (eight years ago)
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, November 3, 2017 9:46 AM
Reagan lied and often lied well, and the Beltway press was even more populated by credulous gasbags than now, but two notable exceptions aside Reagan's approval ratings were steady.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 3 November 2017 13:51 (eight years ago)
from where? trump diehards aren't going to believe anything from 'fake news' outlets and their favoured sources of news sure as shit aren't going to be reporting any negative fallout from mueller's investigation in good faith, so what 'counterforce' will persuade them?
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 3 November 2017 13:51 (eight years ago)
also, first term Reagan elicited different reactions than second term Ronnie. I mean, Gorby hadn't entered the picture.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 3 November 2017 13:52 (eight years ago)
ehhhhhhhhh I think there are just as many bland church bake-sale teens and thirtysomethings - banging on about abortion and how government should be run like a business and how liberals are so cuckoo with their tax-and-spend ways - as there were before trump. they're probably all a lot nastier than they were when i last really dealt with them face to face, thanks to the long fox news era, and certainly the more racist and hateful aspects of their political thinking have a much more dangerous license to be spoken these days. but it's not like every rank-and-file republican dropped everything to join 4chan a year ago.
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 3 November 2017 13:54 (eight years ago)
calling DJT a "degenerate animal" or a "disgusting animal" should be de rigueur… would troll the fuck out of cerno/alt-right/ gamer/4chan shitheads, who think only they get to troll…
― veronica moser, Friday, 3 November 2017 13:58 (eight years ago)
Trump referring to Warren as Pocahontas. For shame. How would Trump feel if people called him Hitler because of his German roots?
― nashwan, Friday, 3 November 2017 13:59 (eight years ago)
The only real upside of the increasingly-nihilistic right is that it's difficult for gravy-stained brownshirts to breed from the isolated confines of their parents' basements.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 14:01 (eight years ago)
that Vox piece was great, and yeah, pretty much exactly what I anticipate happening :/
― frogbs, Friday, 3 November 2017 14:02 (eight years ago)
No, no, it's supposed to be "Fauxcahontas," because she falsely claimed some Native American ancestry to get preferential treatment and get counted as a diversity hire. That's the Rush/Fox line, anyway. (Alternative zing: "Lieawatha.")
But because Trump is stupid, he just says "Pocahontas" and the Red Hat Brigade howls with approval anyway, because they knew what he meant. And having the right enemies / pissing off the right people is all that matters anymore.
― Careful with that Ax, Emanuel (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 3 November 2017 14:07 (eight years ago)
Yes, he could just as easily call her Eleanor Roosevelt or Attila the Hun or Clubber Lang. It doesn't matter if it has a meaningful referent or makes any sense as long as it's understood that it's a pejorative used to keep a big-mouth woman in her place.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 14:12 (eight years ago)
I have never heard either of these, whereas "Pocahontas" comes up all the time from conservatives in MA.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Friday, 3 November 2017 14:15 (eight years ago)
now i want trump to call someone 'clubber lang' ffs
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 3 November 2017 14:16 (eight years ago)
Flora MacDonald would be funnier. His mother's even from the same area.
― Terry Micawber (Tom D.), Friday, 3 November 2017 14:37 (eight years ago)
'donald where's your trousers' now playing on internal jukebox
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 3 November 2017 14:38 (eight years ago)
clubber lang is a fuckin inspired choice for an imaginary non sequitur trump insult, bravo
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 3 November 2017 14:42 (eight years ago)
Best memory in the world
http://m.sfgate.com/news/politics/article/Trump-I-don-t-remember-meeting-at-center-of-12329138.php
― Οὖτις, Friday, 3 November 2017 14:56 (eight years ago)
How I wish media would stop using photos of butthole-mouth Trump :'-o
― Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 3 November 2017 14:59 (eight years ago)
used to be i cherished the sight of every butthole
now i can barely stand to look at a butthole for more than an hour or two at a time
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 3 November 2017 15:01 (eight years ago)
thanks obama
LBI, please be sensitive, a butthole is the only mouth he has.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 15:07 (eight years ago)
the Oval Orifice
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 November 2017 15:08 (eight years ago)
donald t. rump
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 3 November 2017 15:12 (eight years ago)
OL that's true. Morbius eww
― Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 3 November 2017 15:17 (eight years ago)
Our president's brave refusal to contort his facial sphincter into a quote 'normal' mouth shape increases awareness of those unfortunate souls who have to go through life unable to produce anything but utter shit from their word holes.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 15:20 (eight years ago)
That Vox piece is hella depressing for sure.
― stet, Friday, 3 November 2017 15:31 (eight years ago)
yeah I think "lol nothing matters" has kind of been the lesson for a while now, especially in light of stuff like this
Meanwhile, Trump's Gallup approval percentage -- which hit a new low of 33 on Sunday -- has climbed 5 points since the indictments. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
― frogbs, Friday, 3 November 2017 15:42 (eight years ago)
Just wondering, from a legal perspective, if you have a person claiming repeatedly that they have an excellent memory, one of the best ever, stretching back decades, except when they are questioned or deposed, when they suddenly get foggy or forgetful, does that carry any weight? Like, contempt or something? Unless they outright plead the fifth?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 15:43 (eight years ago)
Of course his polling went up, Mueller's investigation declared him 100% not guilty. He said it himself, there is no Trump in the charges.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 15:44 (eight years ago)
http://www.businessinsider.com/republicans-introduce-bill-to-remove-bob-mueller-from-special-counsel-2017-11
but her uraniums
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 3 November 2017 15:55 (eight years ago)
xxp he can just claim that he was exaggerating? I feel you sometimes take things literally that no-one else takes literally.
― Andrew Farrell, Friday, 3 November 2017 15:57 (eight years ago)
xp here we go
― sleeve, Friday, 3 November 2017 15:59 (eight years ago)
How is this anything other than a bureaucratic if no less naked method of arranging to have the judge at your trial whacked?
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:03 (eight years ago)
Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, along with Reps. Andy Biggs of Arizona and Louie Gohmert of Texas,
looooool, fucking LOUIE GOHMERT IS LEADING THE CHARGE EVERYBODY
― Karl Malone, Friday, 3 November 2017 16:03 (eight years ago)
if you look around, facebook has good posts on this
As much as I like Jeff Sessions it is time for him to resign. He has recused himself from all things Russia and Clinton thus making him useless and his assistant Rod Rosenstein must go too because of his involvement in the Uranium One Scandal. Bring in someone like...yes I am going to say it...Giuliani who has no agenda and is a pit bull. Jeff Sessions is a lame duck Attorney General and must do the honorable thing and step down. Hell make him DHS Secretary he would be good there but he has to go.
― drejelire, Friday, 3 November 2017 16:12 (eight years ago)
Sorry, did you say 'good'?
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:14 (eight years ago)
ah yes, the famously agenda-free rudy giuliani
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:14 (eight years ago)
Giuliani is too dirty to be confirmed even in this shitshow
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:15 (eight years ago)
pleading the fifth
pleading the filth
― Careful with that Ax, Emanuel (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:16 (eight years ago)
I made a couple G. Gordon Liddy will be the new special prosecutor jokes on twitter yesterday and now I'm leaving one here.
please clap.
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:17 (eight years ago)
he can just claim that he was exaggerating? I feel you sometimes take things literally that no-one else takes literally.
Impugning credibility is a common legal strategy. I mean, his dumbass tweets have been used against him in court. So, sure, he could say "I was just exaggerating," but "I was just exaggerating" is a shit defense that no doubt brings people down all the time.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 16:19 (eight years ago)
Also who else is excited about having to re-live the 2016 election for the rest of our mother fucking lives
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:21 (eight years ago)
hey for awhile it was 2000
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:25 (eight years ago)
at least the heat is off Nader
...yes I am going to say it...
― j., Friday, 3 November 2017 16:29 (eight years ago)
no Nader, no GWBno GWB, no Iraq warno Iraq war, no ISIS
unfortunately i think Trump still wins in this timeline
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:33 (eight years ago)
Tracer, u wanna rassle
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:35 (eight years ago)
So this uranium shit, is this going to be the new Benghazi/ACA, with just a new motion or law or appeal or some other BS being introduced again, and again, and again, no matter the result?
Anyway, nothing seems impossible anymore, but as a friend reminded me, Mueller is not just this one unstoppable terminator. There are whole teams of FBI/DOJ people working on this stuff, many privy to what Mueller is privy to. If he is somehow removed, that ends his authority but not necessarily any investigation.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 16:35 (eight years ago)
It may get raised over and over, but the record is very clear about what happened, and there is absolutely nothing suspicious about it.
― Moodles, Friday, 3 November 2017 16:44 (eight years ago)
its 1000% a smokescreen and is effective because its so convoluted.
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:46 (eight years ago)
lol I know it's a dumb train of thought Morbs
But like in baseball, we often think that when one unexpected variable takes the flow of events far off course, any speculation on what would have happened absent that variable is spurious. BUT.. accepting that logic means accepting that equally there's no reason to believe things wouldn't have actually worked out exactly the way they looked like they were going to in the first place
but hey let's relitigate just one election at a time here, soz everyone
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:47 (eight years ago)
"As much as I like Jeff Sessions..."
― nashwan, Friday, 3 November 2017 16:49 (eight years ago)
BUT.. accepting that logic means accepting that equally there's no reason to believe things wouldn't have actually worked out exactly the way they looked like they were going to in the first place
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/94/89/cc/9489cc4aaa333ebd57a6d9fc13be6499.jpg
― difficult listening hour, Friday, 3 November 2017 16:50 (eight years ago)
Here's some joy!
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/03/technology/trump-twitter-deleted.html
The person who shut down Mr. Trump’s account was a contractor, the people said.The discovery highlights a difficult issue for Twitter, as well as other technology companies that rely on large amounts of contract workers to handle sensitive work. Facebook, Twitter and other companies outsource content review to third-party services like ProUnlimited and Cognizant, which are essentially internet call centers staffed with hundreds of workers who deal with customer service issues.Facebook and Twitter had spent much of the early part of this week testifying in congressional hearings about how they planned to hire more people to help prohibit the misuse of their platforms. Facebook said it was hiring an additional 10,000 workers to review flagged content, bringing the total to 20,000 by the end of 2018.But in a conference call with investors earlier this week, the social network said many of these will likely not be full-time employees; the company will largely rely on third-party contractors.Twitter employees have expressed concern about the widely available nature of internal tools for handling customer accounts. Hundreds of employees are able to access the accounts of so-called Very Important Tweeters, or VITs, and can take actions like disabling the accounts, according to current and former Twitter employees. Twitter customer support cannot, however, access customers’ private direct messages, nor can they tweet on behalf of other users, these people said.
The discovery highlights a difficult issue for Twitter, as well as other technology companies that rely on large amounts of contract workers to handle sensitive work. Facebook, Twitter and other companies outsource content review to third-party services like ProUnlimited and Cognizant, which are essentially internet call centers staffed with hundreds of workers who deal with customer service issues.
Facebook and Twitter had spent much of the early part of this week testifying in congressional hearings about how they planned to hire more people to help prohibit the misuse of their platforms. Facebook said it was hiring an additional 10,000 workers to review flagged content, bringing the total to 20,000 by the end of 2018.
But in a conference call with investors earlier this week, the social network said many of these will likely not be full-time employees; the company will largely rely on third-party contractors.
Twitter employees have expressed concern about the widely available nature of internal tools for handling customer accounts. Hundreds of employees are able to access the accounts of so-called Very Important Tweeters, or VITs, and can take actions like disabling the accounts, according to current and former Twitter employees. Twitter customer support cannot, however, access customers’ private direct messages, nor can they tweet on behalf of other users, these people said.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 3 November 2017 16:51 (eight years ago)
Random mystery hire: welcome to the #resistance
― YouTube_-_funy_cats.flv (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:54 (eight years ago)
Very Important Tweeters, or VITs
ffs
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 3 November 2017 16:54 (eight years ago)
The self-mutilation that the center-to-left endlessly inflicts on itself certainly has nothing to do with people like Dubya and Trump becoming President and turning our country into a laughingstock.
― El Tomboto, Friday, 3 November 2017 16:55 (eight years ago)
That is to say it’s not at all a dumb train of thought, Tracer, and imo spoilers from the Greens are pragmatically no different than Richard Spencer
― El Tomboto, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:00 (eight years ago)
deplorables have a point that liberals are stuck-up
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 3 November 2017 17:01 (eight years ago)
well they shift debate nominally to the left rather than to the right which has its own pragmatic benefits and someone like corbyn, who lost the most recent election, is i think a very positive development for the labour party (and for the UK more widely)
not sure generalizable rules can be extracted from the nader farrago
lol dlh ty
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 November 2017 17:02 (eight years ago)
I actually think Tracer's speculation has some merit, in that the impulses that led Trump are primarily around domestic politics, rather than foreign policy.
But generally you can't change one variable and assume every other one stays the same. Would we have gone from Gore to Obama in that timeline?
― Careful with that Ax, Emanuel (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 3 November 2017 17:06 (eight years ago)
labour gained power and vastly outperformed expectation so not really comparable to a US situation, also don't know if you noticed but corbyn is the prime minister
― Simon H., Friday, 3 November 2017 17:06 (eight years ago)
Have said it before that we are living a snobs vs. slobs comedy, except 1) the good guys are the stuck up ones, and 2) it's not funny.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:07 (eight years ago)
well they shift debate nominally to the left rather than to the right
― El Tomboto, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:08 (eight years ago)
Twitter customer support cannot, however, access customers’ private direct messages, nor can they tweet on behalf of other users, these people said.
this at least is good, I always wondered if some rogue employee could just tweet "I hereby order a missile strike on NoKo" and plunge the world into Wargames-style annihilation
― frogbs, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:10 (eight years ago)
the unbroken string of nicer mass murderers/unionbusters who've run the show gave us Dubya and Trump
also don't get your "center" on my "left"
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 November 2017 17:11 (eight years ago)
that said it's kind of amazing that no one's guessed his Twitter password yet
― frogbs, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:12 (eight years ago)
12345
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:15 (eight years ago)
Morbius demonstrating his strong grasp of elections once again
― El Tomboto, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:16 (eight years ago)
http://hodgespart.com/gong_images/_gong/spaceballs.jpg
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 3 November 2017 17:16 (eight years ago)
just watched that last weekend with the kids, it is the best
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 November 2017 17:17 (eight years ago)
I want to love you (VIT!) Twitter Trump Thing!
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Friday, 3 November 2017 17:18 (eight years ago)
I do understand elections, Tom. I've already said if I'd lived in a swing state I'd have voted for Rodham-Kissinger, and you people would never have heard the end of it.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 November 2017 17:19 (eight years ago)
https://www.thenation.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Hillary_Kissinger_AP_img.jpg
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 3 November 2017 17:21 (eight years ago)
does the ongoing breakdown in our spiritual/civic/material life alluded to in that vox piece mirror the spectre of the onset climate change? like in addition to dealing with megahurricans when i'm 70 am i also going to have to look out for pepe greenshirt brigades
― global tetrahedron, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:23 (eight years ago)
I do think there's some correlation. As people slowly start to realize we're on a collision course that can only be reversed or even slowed through the application of will that just doesn't seem to exist, they understandably stop giving as much of a fuck.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 17:36 (eight years ago)
that would confirm my theory that a lot of those folks secretly do believe in climate change but are just petrified and would rather ignore it and succumb to nihilism
― global tetrahedron, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:38 (eight years ago)
Colon cancer is fake news (dies)!
Never underestimate people's capacity for compartmentalization, particularly when they're frightened.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 17:42 (eight years ago)
oblivious liberal stuck-up-ed-ness tends to irritate as much as naked conservative neo-feudalism does both 1) weaponized fox-deplorables and 2) people who grew up and persist paycheck-to-paycheck who aren't quite politicized / ideological; "meritocratic" liberals not realizing that (and ignoring group 2 altogether) is a tragic american flaw, a 'dunning-kruger effect' of the left, as it were
xpost
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 3 November 2017 17:47 (eight years ago)
Trumps phone has two-factor authentication, keyed to his non-reproducible butthole mouth; every morning he kisses it to sign in.
― Andrew Farrell, Friday, 3 November 2017 17:50 (eight years ago)
Whomp whomp
Bloomberg: Authorities in Cyprus gave Manafort’s bank records to Mueller’s team just before he was indicted. https://t.co/KEUZtbhC6Q— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) November 3, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 3 November 2017 18:49 (eight years ago)
succumb to nihilism
nihilism is comforting tbh
― marcos, Friday, 3 November 2017 18:52 (eight years ago)
love nihilism
― .oO (silby), Friday, 3 November 2017 18:53 (eight years ago)
When you believe in nothing you've got nothing to lose.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 18:54 (eight years ago)
President Trump has posted his first golf score to his USGA handicap page since June 2016. It says he shot a 68 last month.— Darren Samuelsohn (@dsamuelsohn) November 2, 2017
gtfo
― mookieproof, Friday, 3 November 2017 19:26 (eight years ago)
relax, he was just playing the par threes
― imago, Friday, 3 November 2017 19:37 (eight years ago)
i heard that kim jong-un played putt putt last year and got a hole-in-one on all 18 holes. it was amazing, no one had even heard of that before
― Karl Malone, Friday, 3 November 2017 19:39 (eight years ago)
the dotard's tax return reveal is gonna be epic
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 3 November 2017 19:48 (eight years ago)
I predict his tax returns come in well under par.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 3 November 2017 19:57 (eight years ago)
imo spoilers from the Greens are pragmatically no different than Richard Spencerthe US Greens are barely a party and Jill Stein is a moron, but electoral reform is the problem, not genuinely well-meaning people wanting to improve constituents' lives
― shackling the masses with plastic-wrapped snack picks (sic), Friday, 3 November 2017 20:05 (eight years ago)
i'm all about learning what's in the tax returns
but, just curious, does anyone think it will matter at all what's in there, no matter how bad or shocking? it's why the scenario in the david roberts/vox thing posted a little upthread was so terrible to think about, because it seems so likely.
― Karl Malone, Friday, 3 November 2017 20:06 (eight years ago)
like, America is profoundly broken by being a two-party system, but the last two days have shown how futile it can be attempting to effect change from within, and independent candidates do get elected in the US. sometimes.
― shackling the masses with plastic-wrapped snack picks (sic), Friday, 3 November 2017 20:06 (eight years ago)
DJT probably drew little penises in all the boxes when he did his taxes, and the people who dislike him will be outraged, and the people who like him will hoot and holler and continue drinking furniture polish or whatever it is that makes their brains like that.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 20:14 (eight years ago)
"those penises were already on the boxes when i received them, your honor"
― Karl Malone, Friday, 3 November 2017 20:18 (eight years ago)
there's nothing on the page that says you can't draw penises in the boxes
― j., Friday, 3 November 2017 20:20 (eight years ago)
It never stops with him!
Carter Page tells @jaketapper he told a few more people on Trump campaign beyond Sessions about his trip to Moscow in 2016. Won't say who— Manu Raju (@mkraju) November 3, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 3 November 2017 20:24 (eight years ago)
Orwell quote comes to mind, from Wigan Pier:
The ordinary man may not flinch from a dictatorship of the proletariat, if you offer it tactfully; offer him a dictatorship of the prigs, and he gets ready to fight...
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Friday, 3 November 2017 20:25 (eight years ago)
does anyone think it will matter at all what's in there, no matter how bad or shocking?
yes. i've become less flippant about don's teflon-ness since paul manafort and rick gates were indicted by former FBI director robert mueller. that's a batshit crazy development in US history. if the GOP can't pass ALEC's income tax cut for the Kochs and their seditious ilk, 2scoops might be in a bit of trouble
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 3 November 2017 20:25 (eight years ago)
And I should say I use my quote refers to the comment “oblivious liberal stuck-up-ed-ness”
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Friday, 3 November 2017 20:28 (eight years ago)
i forget - did anyone know carter page before he suddenly appeared on the foreign policy team? i know it's kind of a mystery how some of the 5 people on the team were selected, and who recommended them. but was carter page an unfamiliar name before landing on the team, too?
the ken burns documentary event on this period is going to have to be at least 40 hours long, there's so much
― Karl Malone, Friday, 3 November 2017 20:30 (eight years ago)
Yeah I first remember Page's name surfacing around that time, and a couple of American reporter/policy types noting his Moscow trips and speeches -- I remember following one real time moment of coverage -- and them thinking he was all about bootlicking garbage.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 3 November 2017 20:39 (eight years ago)
https://s.yimg.com/uu/api/res/1.2/JRdoNqTii6kGVV7V3VxrQQ--~B/Zmk9c3RyaW07aD0zODg7cHlvZmY9MDtxPTk1O3c9NzIwO3NtPTE7YXBwaWQ9eXRhY2h5b24-/http://media.zenfs.com/en/homerun/feed_manager_auto_publish_494/876f0cd80a4a192d06ec76c4b5260fc9
this photo makes it look like Donald Trump was hiding behind a corner waiting to jump out so he could yell at Bowe Bergdahl.
― drejelire, Friday, 3 November 2017 20:40 (eight years ago)
first impressions were very accurate in this case. somehow i've managed to avoid video of him until this week. he is kind of fascinating. everything about him seems very unreal and unlikely, yet here he is, talking to everyone, no filter
― Karl Malone, Friday, 3 November 2017 20:42 (eight years ago)
miserable-looking soldier otm
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 3 November 2017 20:42 (eight years ago)
The video of Carter Page’s speech in Moscow in June 2016 is one of the top Google results when you search for his name and it was widely covered at the time (partly because he tried to do part of it in Russian and ended up talking gobbledegook). The idea that none of Trump’s team recall him mentioning it before he went is vaguely plausible but the idea, which Sessions seemed to hint at, that he didn’t know about it afterwards is magnificently silly.
He is a nobody - no real business experience, no academic credentials and no expertise in Russian affairs bar having lived there for a few years iirc. He seems to have a minor talent for grifting.
― Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Friday, 3 November 2017 20:45 (eight years ago)
Given that last point he should have been Trump's AG.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 3 November 2017 20:50 (eight years ago)
genuinely well-meaning people wanting to improve constituents' lives
that in no way describes nader or stein when they ran afaict
― El Tomboto, Friday, 3 November 2017 20:55 (eight years ago)
pretty sure sic was talking about Greens below the presidential level, like some who are winning offices
so this Asia trip should go well, huh
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 November 2017 21:00 (eight years ago)
everything about him seems very unreal and unlikely, yet here he is, talking to everyone, no filter
Wait, are we talking about Trump or Carter Page?
― the young, low level volunteer named (Dan Peterson), Friday, 3 November 2017 21:12 (eight years ago)
page shaved his head in rejection of mr. trump's demanding leadership fwiu
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 3 November 2017 21:20 (eight years ago)
ICYMI
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/11/03/561797675/im-the-only-one-that-matters-trump-says-of-state-dept-job-vacancies
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 November 2017 21:29 (eight years ago)
let's try to think of hypothetical situations where it is good to have a leader that think he's the only person who matters
― Karl Malone, Friday, 3 November 2017 21:32 (eight years ago)
NPR's hourly news played a clip of Yam yelling over his helicopter "not an important meeting, don't remember much about it" re the Papadopoulos offer to set up a meeting with Putin. Then the correspondent wrapped up with "Last month, the president said he had 'one of the greatest memories of all time.'"
*twist*
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 3 November 2017 21:38 (eight years ago)
L'etat, c'est lui
― Careful with that Ax, Emanuel (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45 (eight years ago)
"We don't need all of the people. You know, it's called cost-saving."
the "it's called" formulation is one of the all-time classic condescensions of the 80s and 90s and i wouldn't be surprised if, like so many of his aggressively dumbass mannerisms, the condescension has just become so ingrained in his thought and action that it's become a tic, barely signifying its original cutting quality anymore and just part of the skein of general hostility that he approaches the world with
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 3 November 2017 22:01 (eight years ago)
Our asshole president is landing here in Honolulu for a layover in a couple of hours. Mayor's let all 8,000 city employees take a vacation day if they want. Traffic is going to be hell as usual when presidential visits happen. There's a big demonstration planned at the state capital, and I'm on the fence about whether to go. Trump is probably going to be some distance away at Pearl Harbor the whole time, but hopefully he'll see the protests on TV and know he's not too welcome in Hawaii. I don't have a sign to wave but if I did it would say, uh, God I don't know, DIE IN A FIRE or smthg.
― davey, Friday, 3 November 2017 22:13 (eight years ago)
― Karl Malone, Friday, November 3, 2017 4:32 PM (thirty-five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
FWIW, I don't think he's speaking wrt his role as president. I think this is genuinely his perspective of the world. Why should he care what a country full of NPCs think about anything?
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 22:13 (eight years ago)
What if...
...Trump's entire MO for the HNL trip is to inspect Obama's birth certificate?
― Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Friday, 3 November 2017 22:15 (eight years ago)
xpost Our job is just to tell him which village to visit next and how to level up his fake news shield.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Friday, 3 November 2017 22:15 (eight years ago)
that in no way describes nader or stein when they ran afaictyeah I deliberately excluded Stein before saying that
― shackling the masses with plastic-wrapped snack picks (sic), Friday, 3 November 2017 22:23 (eight years ago)
xp So I do have valid reasons to be ambivalent about the rally.
If Donald inspected the birth certificate and found Obama was born in Hawaii, of course he still wouldn't accept it then, either. Official records are fake news. Anything we don't want to be true is fake news.
― davey, Friday, 3 November 2017 22:25 (eight years ago)
Our armory carries the best equipment around!...Our armory carries the best equipment around!...You won't find a better shield in America!...Our armory carries the best equipment around!
― Karl Malone, Friday, 3 November 2017 22:25 (eight years ago)
Pee tape imminent.
Longtime Trump bodyguard to face questions about 2013 Moscow trip https://t.co/zupTSatxOo— Washington Post (@washingtonpost) November 4, 2017
― Moodles, Saturday, 4 November 2017 05:08 (eight years ago)
We ain’t that lucky/cursed.
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Saturday, 4 November 2017 07:32 (eight years ago)
please let the pee tape drop on 12/25/17
― she carries a torch. two torches, actually (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Saturday, 4 November 2017 10:57 (eight years ago)
all i want for christmas is u(rine)
― estela, Saturday, 4 November 2017 11:01 (eight years ago)
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 4 November 2017 11:16 (eight years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLIppgE45wM
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:17 (eight years ago)
I hate zappa but when I was a kid that was the FUNNIEST shit.
― dan selzer, Saturday, 4 November 2017 13:49 (eight years ago)
Throwback to a bad soap opera that feels like it was broadcast half a decade ago, even though it was, like, this July: Today I noticed that my currently dormant Viennese experimental music calendar/Twitter account from back when I lived there was follow-spammed by the Mooch. I let the beautiful absurdity of it all linger for a few hours, then did what I guess was the ethically sound thing to do
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNyxbBMWsAA6eQ0.jpg:largehttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNzge5mWAAA3-io.jpg:large
― 🔱 Holger Jowday ^🌑^ (Dancing on the Pylons), Saturday, 4 November 2017 17:59 (eight years ago)
Hm, that first screenshot was kinda unnecessary. Anyway, one day he'll turn up at the Alte Schmiede or Rhiz or another one of Vienna's marvelous underground/experimental etc. venues and proclaim proudly that he found all of this without the help of @VienneseMoon
― 🔱 Holger Jowday ^🌑^ (Dancing on the Pylons), Saturday, 4 November 2017 18:00 (eight years ago)
WASHINGTON — One of President Trump’s biggest disappointments in office, by his own account, was discovering that he is not supposed to personally direct law enforcement decisions by the Justice Department and the F.B.I. So, instead, he has made himself into perhaps the most vocal critic of America’s system of justice ever to occupy the Oval Office.Just this week, he denounced the criminal justice system as “a joke” and “a laughingstock.” He demanded that the suspect in the New York terrorist attack be executed. He spent Friday berating the Justice Department and F.B.I. for not investigating his political opponents. He then turned to the military justice system and called a court-martial decision “a complete and total disgrace.”The repeated assaults on law enforcement cross lines that presidents have largely observed since the Watergate era, raising questions about the separation of politics and the law. But as extraordinary as Mr. Trump’s broadsides are, perhaps more striking is that investigators and prosecutors are so far ignoring the head of the executive branch in which they serve while military judges and juries are for the most part disregarding the opinions of their commander in chief.“You know, the saddest thing is that because I’m the president of the United States, I am not supposed to be involved with the Justice Department,” Mr. Trump said in a radio interview on Thursday on the “Larry O’Connor Show.” “I am not supposed to be involved with the F.B.I. I’m not supposed to be doing the kind of things that I would love to be doing. And I’m very frustrated by it.”That frustration has been fueled particularly by Mr. Trump’s inability to control the special counsel investigation into whether his campaign coordinated with Russia during last year’s election, an investigation that unveiled its first criminal charges this week against Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman and two other advisers....
Just this week, he denounced the criminal justice system as “a joke” and “a laughingstock.” He demanded that the suspect in the New York terrorist attack be executed. He spent Friday berating the Justice Department and F.B.I. for not investigating his political opponents. He then turned to the military justice system and called a court-martial decision “a complete and total disgrace.”
The repeated assaults on law enforcement cross lines that presidents have largely observed since the Watergate era, raising questions about the separation of politics and the law. But as extraordinary as Mr. Trump’s broadsides are, perhaps more striking is that investigators and prosecutors are so far ignoring the head of the executive branch in which they serve while military judges and juries are for the most part disregarding the opinions of their commander in chief.
“You know, the saddest thing is that because I’m the president of the United States, I am not supposed to be involved with the Justice Department,” Mr. Trump said in a radio interview on Thursday on the “Larry O’Connor Show.” “I am not supposed to be involved with the F.B.I. I’m not supposed to be doing the kind of things that I would love to be doing. And I’m very frustrated by it.”
That frustration has been fueled particularly by Mr. Trump’s inability to control the special counsel investigation into whether his campaign coordinated with Russia during last year’s election, an investigation that unveiled its first criminal charges this week against Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman and two other advisers.
...
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/03/us/politics/trump-says-justice-dept-and-fbi-must-do-what-is-right-and-investigate-democrats.html
seriously, one of my biggest frustrations is that i would really, honestly, love to hear trump's thoughts on the long-term repercussions of allowing a president to control investigations into the activities of presidential administrations. what would he think if obama were allowed to shut down an investigation into the obama administration? or clinton? or nixon? i would love for him to consider this question, and then just lay out his vision for how the world would be better that way.
no need to state the obvious, that he's not capable of it, that he's a literal piece of shit, no literally, he is literally a piece of shit, etc. i know all that. i'm just saying, god damn is it frustrating to know that none of us will ever get clear answers to so many things about trump. at some point maybe we will achieve some measure of closure with what has happened the last few years, but there will be always be some things that are just so fucking unbelievable, with no answers. at least nixon was an intelligent man and you could imagine having a conversation with him where he revealed, inadvertently or purposefully, what his motives were. but trump..god damn. it is maddening.
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 4 November 2017 18:06 (eight years ago)
also, giantmiddlefinger4K_HD.png to david rivkin.
Some conservatives defended Mr. Trump’s right to exercise oversight of the country’s law enforcement agencies, saying that it would be dangerous to have an attorney general and an F.B.I. director who were not answerable to elected leaders.“The notion that law enforcement, in particular, is somehow to be insulated from political influences and therefore inevitably insulated from political accountability is a horribly dangerous idea from the standpoint of civil liberty,” said David B. Rivkin Jr., a White House and Justice Department lawyer under Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush.However, Mr. Rivkin added, “That doesn’t mean you exercise your authority to direct those things in a crude and obscene fashion. You have to exercise some politesse about it.”
“The notion that law enforcement, in particular, is somehow to be insulated from political influences and therefore inevitably insulated from political accountability is a horribly dangerous idea from the standpoint of civil liberty,” said David B. Rivkin Jr., a White House and Justice Department lawyer under Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush.
However, Mr. Rivkin added, “That doesn’t mean you exercise your authority to direct those things in a crude and obscene fashion. You have to exercise some politesse about it.”
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 4 November 2017 18:12 (eight years ago)
It would be better because since every Dem is a criminal, Trump making the justice department great again (MtJDGA!) would mean no Dem would ever become president, ensuring that that power would never be misused.
― Frederik B, Saturday, 4 November 2017 18:14 (eight years ago)
"I’m not supposed to be doing the kind of things that I would love to be doing. And I’m very frustrated by it.”
Or, to put it another way, he'd love to be doing the kind of things he's not supposed to do. Which basically translates as, "I'd like do anything and everything I feel like doing. I'd love to be Il Duce or Der Fuehrer."
― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 4 November 2017 20:00 (eight years ago)
what is the name for a society built upon a commonly shared respect for facts? it's not the social contract. is it just referring to the preconditions of civil society? i'm blanking on a key term, sorry.
but whatever it is, it feels like it's crumbling. the white house approves a climate report that is, while supported by science and in line with past reports, completely at odds with every action the trump administration has taken on climate change. what a jarring conflict! it makes no sense! and it really doesn't matter. feels like things like this happen all the time, recently.
if trump were playing dimensional-style chess, i'd almost argue this was the final goal, more than anything else: showing that the government can pretty much fall on its face and be incompetent everywhere, and you'll still get by. the corporations are doing fine, and they're here to make sure that we can be fine, at least when using their products. i'm not criticizing the escapists - i have been escaping all the fucking time the last year+. it can be a way of life. but corporatization of everything has accelerated in a gross way. it is everywhere and it permeates everything. i have no proof or evidence, i just feel it, and believe it. it permeates the culture. have you heard of the new trivia quiz app HQ? it is accidentally the purest distillation of dystopia, and it is real, and it is your hand twice a day. 30,000 people competing for $150 with the Smash TV voice as the host. it's hard to explain, and if you do decide to check it out let me know since it gives me a free extra life if i refer you. doubling the user base twice in 2 days, then again in another 2 days, then again. exponential growth, from the founders of Vine! i can't stop playing it.
sorry, got the rainy saturday blues. but for me one of the mental images of the year was facebook, twitter, and google sending their lawyers to testify in front of congress, instead of the CEOs appearing, as is usually the case when a company or entire industry completely fucks up. they sent their representatives! that's power. have your people talk to my people. and did anyone really care for longer than 24 hours? anyway, it just seems like a result of all of this is showing that the effective control of...civil society...? can shift from a system that is at least nominally based upon representation and elections to one that is wholly corporate and privatized. i can already hear the people saying that happened 50 years ago, but imo we have seen many glimpses of it before, but never so broadly across society, and so persistently, and more importantly without sufficient complaint to push it back.
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 4 November 2017 20:13 (eight years ago)
On the plus side, Zuckerberg during their earnings call deviated from script and said specifically that the company was spending so much to right the ship that earnings would actually be negatively affected. So there is that.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 20:16 (eight years ago)
what is the name for a society built upon a commonly shared respect for facts?
According to the neo-cons in the GW Bush administration, it's "the reality-based community". Strange to say, they proudly excluded themselves from that community.
― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 4 November 2017 20:18 (eight years ago)
that's what i mean, though! a plus is that this unelected dude we have no control over has generously decided to donate a small portion of his company's profits to the idea of helping out the country that currently contains their headquarters, and we're all like "well, he can do whatever he wants and it affects all of us, but glad they did the right thing here." that is power
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 4 November 2017 20:22 (eight years ago)
the name is "the state of nature"
― difficult listening hour, Saturday, 4 November 2017 20:23 (eight years ago)
wait i mean the other way round lol. sure fucked up that partic gnomic truism
― difficult listening hour, Saturday, 4 November 2017 20:24 (eight years ago)
anyway i posted this in the pol phil thread cuz found it spooky
sheldon wolin on hobbes:
The state of nature symbolized not only an extreme disorder in human relations, causing men to consent to the creation of an irresistible power; it was also a condition distraught by an anarchy of meanings. In nature each man could freely use his reason to seek his own ends: each was the final judge of what constituted rationality. The problem posed involved more than the moral issues arising from man's vanity or his desire for pre-eminence. It was a genuinely philosophical one involving the status of knowledge....[Man] alone of all the animals possessed speech and was capable of science, yet he alone could turn speech into deception, ideas into sedition, learning into mystification.... These ironical overtones rule out interpreting the state of nature as belonging to the remote past... Instead, it represented an imaginative reconstruction of a recurrent human possibility ... built on the causes and consequences of political breakdown. Its meaning remained eternally contemporary and urgent....
In this sense, the concept did not belong solely to the past or even to the present. Its status was that of an ever-present possibility inherent in any organized political society, a ubiquitous threat which, like some macabre companion, accompanied society in every stage of its journey. It was present each night, as men sealed themselves in their homes and succeeded only in locking in fear.... The content of the state of nature could be filled in by consulting "the manner of life which men that have formerly lived under a peaceful government, use to generate into, in a civil war."
― difficult listening hour, Wednesday, January 11, 2017 10:25 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― difficult listening hour, Saturday, 4 November 2017 20:26 (eight years ago)
In Nietzsche's dream we each remain the arbiters of rationality, and like Hobbes this betrays the usual promise of objectivity; but there is, he says, another way to understand objectivity:
understood not as `disinterested contemplation' (which is a non-concept and absurdity), but rather as the capacity to have one's pro and contra in one's power, and to shift them in and out: so that one knows how to make precisely the difference in perspectives and affective interpretations useful for knowledge...There is only a perspectival seeing, only a perspectival `knowing'; and the more affects we allow to speak about a matter, the more eyes, different eyes, we know how to bring to bear on one and the same matter, that much more complete will our concept of this matter, our objectivity be.
Objectivity as completeness: but this is the aim only of a very powerful individual, one who can assume so many different identities that she can see the question from every angle.
To N there is no "neutral" point of view, no neutral individual, no neutral state. Only the best, though, can inhabit a multiplicity of points of view, of identities; on them rests the possibility of another escape from the state of nature.
― droit au butt (Euler), Saturday, 4 November 2017 20:53 (eight years ago)
hey that sounds democratic
― difficult listening hour, Saturday, 4 November 2017 20:57 (eight years ago)
yes!
― droit au butt (Euler), Saturday, 4 November 2017 21:19 (eight years ago)
tho tbf it also sounds okay to the kind of guy who thinks he's my voice
― difficult listening hour, Saturday, 4 November 2017 21:34 (eight years ago)
stopped clock
NEW: WH responds to Bush41 calling POTUS a "blowhard". Calls Iraq "greatest foreign policy mistakes in American history". via/ @NoahGrayCNN pic.twitter.com/XQ2f1JK81C— Ryan Nobles (@ryanobles) November 4, 2017
― Simon H., Saturday, 4 November 2017 22:00 (eight years ago)
Impending death clears the mind.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 4 November 2017 22:06 (eight years ago)
― reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 4 November 2017 22:23 (eight years ago)
THE ENLIGHTENMENT
― j., Saturday, 4 November 2017 22:34 (eight years ago)
He doesn’t know the difference between 41 and 43 right
― frogbs, Saturday, 4 November 2017 22:39 (eight years ago)
Rand Paul was just beat up by his neighbor?
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 23:29 (eight years ago)
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/11/04/sen-rand-paul-assaulted-his-kentucky-home-man-arrested/832663001/
so who would be the best kind of aggrieved constituent for him to have been assaulted by, politically
― j., Saturday, 4 November 2017 23:29 (eight years ago)
A woman
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 4 November 2017 23:52 (eight years ago)
Reported elsewhere it's his neighbor.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 4 November 2017 23:53 (eight years ago)
Yeah, not a rando
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 4 November 2017 23:55 (eight years ago)
sounds like a Bowling Green massacre
― while my dirk gently weeps (symsymsym), Saturday, 4 November 2017 23:56 (eight years ago)
p sure any major military contractor doesn't like Paul v much
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 5 November 2017 00:05 (eight years ago)
otoh no major military contractor has ever actually suffered so much as a broken fingernail from his posturing nonsense
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 5 November 2017 00:07 (eight years ago)
Such people don't like unfriendly rhetoric even if it is ineffectual, e.g. Wall Street turning on Obama because he made grumpy noises while he ensured that they paid not a jot for their Subprime Era crimes.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 5 November 2017 00:21 (eight years ago)
"don't just suck me off, tell me how much you like it"
Trump: I came here to see the pokemons.Abe: They aren't real.Trump: Just show them to me. pic.twitter.com/mlkjCVhYmg— Patrick Chovanec (@prchovanec) November 5, 2017
― j., Sunday, 5 November 2017 04:05 (eight years ago)
is...did...I...just... https://t.co/TGgP7YDbGi pic.twitter.com/9y6p8LGSm5— Eric Geller (@ericgeller) November 5, 2017
― mookieproof, Sunday, 5 November 2017 06:44 (eight years ago)
It's funny the way that qualities I'd find charming in a three-year-old make me want this septuagenarian to go to sleep and never wake up.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Sunday, 5 November 2017 12:48 (eight years ago)
Donald Trump, forever lobbing katanas at ballistic missiles
― bodak horseman (voodoo chili), Sunday, 5 November 2017 13:00 (eight years ago)
Looks like Flynn and his idiot son are next
Please let this happen while Trump is still overseas
― frogbs, Sunday, 5 November 2017 15:34 (eight years ago)
Sounds like this shoe is finally dropping.
EXCLUSIVE: Special Counsel Robert Mueller has enough evidence to bring charges in Michael Flynn investigation https://t.co/8TD2rrfPiw pic.twitter.com/0WSRPX1Kd7— NBC News (@NBCNews) November 5, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 5 November 2017 15:34 (eight years ago)
Oh I should clarify. It’s Flynn’s idiot son, not Trump’s
― frogbs, Sunday, 5 November 2017 15:39 (eight years ago)
You know what's weird? I heard that apparently Michael Flynn's son is actually named Michael Flynn. Not Michael Flynn Jr., just Michael Flynn. I think he informally goes by Jr.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 5 November 2017 15:49 (eight years ago)
This winter: Indictment Mondays!!
― Karl Malone, Sunday, 5 November 2017 15:52 (eight years ago)
xp Is that weird? I share the same name as my father and grandfather and none of us have a suffix.
― jmm, Sunday, 5 November 2017 15:53 (eight years ago)
maybe it's not weird?
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 5 November 2017 16:06 (eight years ago)
You're only a junior if your full name is exactly like your dad's, including middle name.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 5 November 2017 16:06 (eight years ago)
The Jr. thing is very American. So given that he is American, I suppose it's weird.
― Terry Micawber (Tom D.), Sunday, 5 November 2017 16:11 (eight years ago)
Flynn the Elder, Flynn the Younger, Flynn the Eskimo...
― Doctor Casino, Sunday, 5 November 2017 16:13 (eight years ago)
Flynn Jr. is currently posting jubilantly on Twitter about a woman being punched.
― jmm, Sunday, 5 November 2017 16:20 (eight years ago)
flynn the traitor. tomorrow's gonna be interesting
― reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 5 November 2017 16:45 (eight years ago)
That would be his twitter, @mflynnjr
― Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 5 November 2017 18:50 (eight years ago)
Wilbur Ross, the commerce secretary in the Trump administration, shares business interests with Vladimir Putin’s immediate family, and he failed to clearly disclose those interests when he was being confirmed for his cabinet position.Ross — a billionaire industrialist — retains an interest in a shipping company, Navigator Holdings, that was partially owned by his former investment company. One of Navigator’s most important business relationships is with a Russian energy firm controlled, in turn, by Putin’s son-in-law and other members of the Russian president’s inner circle.Some of the details of Ross’s continuing financial holdings — much of which were not disclosed during his confirmation process — are revealed in a trove of more than 7 million internal documents of Appleby, a Bermuda-based law firm, that was leaked to the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung. The documents consist of emails, presentations and other electronic data. These were then shared with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists — a global network that won the Pulitzer Prize this year for its work on the Panama Papers — and its international media partners. NBC News was given access to some of the leaked documents, which the ICIJ calls the “Paradise Papers.”...Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said members of Congress who were part of Ross’ confirmation hearings were under the impression that Ross had divested all of his interests in Navigator. Furthermore, he said, they were unaware of Navigator’s close ties to Russia.“I am astonished and appalled because I feel misled,” said Blumenthal. “Our committee was misled, the American people were misled by the concealment of those companies.” Blumenthal said he will call for the inspector general of the Commerce Department to launch an investigation.
Ross — a billionaire industrialist — retains an interest in a shipping company, Navigator Holdings, that was partially owned by his former investment company. One of Navigator’s most important business relationships is with a Russian energy firm controlled, in turn, by Putin’s son-in-law and other members of the Russian president’s inner circle.
Some of the details of Ross’s continuing financial holdings — much of which were not disclosed during his confirmation process — are revealed in a trove of more than 7 million internal documents of Appleby, a Bermuda-based law firm, that was leaked to the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung. The documents consist of emails, presentations and other electronic data. These were then shared with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists — a global network that won the Pulitzer Prize this year for its work on the Panama Papers — and its international media partners. NBC News was given access to some of the leaked documents, which the ICIJ calls the “Paradise Papers.”
...Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said members of Congress who were part of Ross’ confirmation hearings were under the impression that Ross had divested all of his interests in Navigator. Furthermore, he said, they were unaware of Navigator’s close ties to Russia.
“I am astonished and appalled because I feel misled,” said Blumenthal. “Our committee was misled, the American people were misled by the concealment of those companies.” Blumenthal said he will call for the inspector general of the Commerce Department to launch an investigation.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/leaked-documents-show-commerce-secretary-concealed-ties-putin-cronies-n817711
good luck blumenthal
― Karl Malone, Sunday, 5 November 2017 19:14 (eight years ago)
Donald Trump found in a dog's ear pic.twitter.com/q0K6sdpg1G— Faces in Things (@FacesPics) November 4, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 5 November 2017 20:58 (eight years ago)
well that’s a uniquely upsetting image
― What's the range of an Iranian frogman dipshit? (bizarro gazzara), Sunday, 5 November 2017 21:16 (eight years ago)
Here's a tweedledum-fat profile picture of him to clear your mind:https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017/11/05/us/06PREXY/06PREXY-superJumbo.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 5 November 2017 21:38 (eight years ago)
At this rate this may be the first president with his first Lil' Scoot. Lil' Scoot One.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 5 November 2017 21:39 (eight years ago)
OK, I know the URL refers to the plane behind him but the fact that the Times tagged that photo "06PREXY-superJumbo" is cracking me up.
― grawlix (unperson), Sunday, 5 November 2017 21:46 (eight years ago)
Ha, that was my thought, too!
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 5 November 2017 21:52 (eight years ago)
BOWLING GREEN, Ky. — Sen. Rand Paul is recovering from five broken ribs and bruises to his lungs, and it is unclear when he will return to Washington, aides said Sunday, signaling that injuries he sustained Friday are far more severe than initially thought.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 6 November 2017 02:08 (eight years ago)
Fat Trump is fat, but he ain't no William Howard Taft.
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 6 November 2017 02:10 (eight years ago)
give him time
― j., Monday, 6 November 2017 02:12 (eight years ago)
hmmmm grown adults doing fat jokes, cool
― Men's Scarehouse - "You're gonna like the way you're shook." (m bison), Monday, 6 November 2017 03:37 (eight years ago)
William Howard Taft was no joke.
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 6 November 2017 03:43 (eight years ago)
if you switch the first letters of his name around, it is a joke, albeit an oblique one: Hilliam Toward Waft
― The times they are a changing, perhaps (map), Monday, 6 November 2017 04:01 (eight years ago)
Mmmmm grown adults doing utopia, cool.
― lion in winter, Monday, 6 November 2017 08:07 (eight years ago)
re TX: "This isn't a guns situation."
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Monday, 6 November 2017 12:08 (eight years ago)
Oh this is funny:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/bannon-protegee-gets-a-new-job-in-the-white-houseand-its-not-going-well
Donald Trump’s special assistant Julia Hahn has a new job in the White House—and, so far, it’s not going according to plan.After Steve Bannon was ousted from the Trump White House in mid-August, his former Breitbart employee and fellow Donald Trump aide Seb Gorka wasn’t far behind. Next, White House official Andrew Surabian, a Bannon adviser and Trump campaign vet, left the West Wing to go join the former chief strategist’s outside political operation.That left Hahn, a former Breitbart staffer and Bannon protégée, to fend for herself in a White House that appeared to be shedding Breitbart alumni and Bannon-associated personnel....Hahn also still works closely with Miller, particularly when pitching outlets on immigration-related stories. And recently, the two of them have been talking to journalists at conservative publications, trying to sell them on a possible deal framework that the White House has been preparing on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), the President Barack Obama- era program ended by Donald Trump that give legal protections to undocumented minors....But Miller and Hahn have had trouble making the sale. Though President Trump is supportive of their approach, the deal does not include the White House’s promised border wall. Beyond that, some conservative reporters have flat-out told the White House that they will not get behind any deal that includes DACA protections, and that they don’t believe Miller and Hahn are selling a “poison pill” at all.This includes Hahn’s former employer.
After Steve Bannon was ousted from the Trump White House in mid-August, his former Breitbart employee and fellow Donald Trump aide Seb Gorka wasn’t far behind. Next, White House official Andrew Surabian, a Bannon adviser and Trump campaign vet, left the West Wing to go join the former chief strategist’s outside political operation.
That left Hahn, a former Breitbart staffer and Bannon protégée, to fend for herself in a White House that appeared to be shedding Breitbart alumni and Bannon-associated personnel.
Hahn also still works closely with Miller, particularly when pitching outlets on immigration-related stories. And recently, the two of them have been talking to journalists at conservative publications, trying to sell them on a possible deal framework that the White House has been preparing on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), the President Barack Obama- era program ended by Donald Trump that give legal protections to undocumented minors.
But Miller and Hahn have had trouble making the sale. Though President Trump is supportive of their approach, the deal does not include the White House’s promised border wall. Beyond that, some conservative reporters have flat-out told the White House that they will not get behind any deal that includes DACA protections, and that they don’t believe Miller and Hahn are selling a “poison pill” at all.
This includes Hahn’s former employer.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 6 November 2017 14:08 (eight years ago)
Meantime, the Rand Paul story...is strange.
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/11/06/562289911/sen-rand-paul-recovering-from-broken-ribs-after-assault
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 6 November 2017 15:00 (eight years ago)
Let the conspiracy fun begin.
Greedo-like fish food kerfuffle:
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/11/06/562271753/dont-be-koi-theres-something-fishy-about-that-trump-abe-photo
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Monday, 6 November 2017 15:23 (eight years ago)
lol that we all fell for this story
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 6 November 2017 15:36 (eight years ago)
http://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/presidential/russia-fake-twitter-facebook-posts-accounts-trump-election-jenna-abrams-20171103.html
Former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn followed both accounts. His son, Michael Flynn Jr., shared a tweet from the Abrams account just days before the election.
Someone more conspiracy-minded might suspect collusion, but I really think these dudes are dumb enough that they were wholeheartedly endorsing stupid divisive russian troll crap
― mh, Monday, 6 November 2017 15:49 (eight years ago)
I can't wait to find out what went down with the Rand Paul story. The silence is deafening. What would cause a neighbor to sucker tackle Rand Paul hard enough to break ribs? And a fellow physician, at that. My first guess is ... there's a spouse involved? Because it scans pretty retaliatory.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 6 November 2017 15:56 (eight years ago)
there's nothing more petty and rage-inducing than neighborhood squabbles
― mh, Monday, 6 November 2017 15:57 (eight years ago)
Sure, but usually at a picnic after a few beers. Rand was mowing the lawn and his neighbor came flying at him from behind!
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 6 November 2017 15:57 (eight years ago)
Maybe he had asked Rand to not mow his lawn because he was trying to watch TV, and Rand was all "live free or die, asshole!" So the dude paused his movie, went outside and tackled him.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 6 November 2017 15:58 (eight years ago)
obviously watching football
― mh, Monday, 6 November 2017 16:02 (eight years ago)
Maybe Paul was just doing an unforgivably-shitty job of mowing his lawn, did you ever think of that.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Monday, 6 November 2017 16:02 (eight years ago)
Is anybody else casting Michael Stuhlbarg in the role of the tackling neighbor
― El Tomboto, Monday, 6 November 2017 16:05 (eight years ago)
there's nothing more petty and rage-inducing than neighborhood squabbles a Trump presidency.
― mh, Monday, November 6, 2017
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 6 November 2017 16:09 (eight years ago)
maybe liberals are just haters. it's not like rand paul faked his american birth certificate or anything
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 6 November 2017 17:06 (eight years ago)
These stories provide a couple more details but not much:
http://www.kentucky.com/news/politics-government/national-politics/article182927486.html
http://www.bgdailynews.com/news/bg-man-charged-with-assaulting-paul-at-senator-s-home/article_e0d36d03-f357-5161-8267-3aa317e978c7.html
My favorite bit, of course:
Boucher is a Bowling Green anesthesiologist and pain specialist who developed a product called Therm-a-Vest, a cloth vest partially filled with rice and secured by Velcro straps that is designed to relieve back pain by delivering heat directly to the areas of the back where most pain is felt.Boucher applied for a patent for the vest in 2003 and has marketed it through the QVC shopping channel.
Boucher applied for a patent for the vest in 2003 and has marketed it through the QVC shopping channel.
"Hey Senator you never delivered on your endorsement, now you'll have cause!" *tackle*
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 6 November 2017 17:10 (eight years ago)
'pain specialist'
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Monday, 6 November 2017 17:18 (eight years ago)
Also assuming Paul actually lost consciousness, 'anesthesiologist'
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Monday, 6 November 2017 17:19 (eight years ago)
the 'anesthesiologist's patented body slam
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Monday, 6 November 2017 18:27 (eight years ago)
how historically ironic that an ayn rand libertarian freak like senator paul may not be in the senate in time to cast a vote to further entrench american neo-feudalism via insane tax cuts
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 6 November 2017 18:33 (eight years ago)
he was probably "no" vote anyway
― Οὖτις, Monday, 6 November 2017 18:34 (eight years ago)
― El Tomboto, Monday, November 6, 2017 8:05 AM (two hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Stuhlbarg should be Rand Paul
https://49.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_likzx3lbbI1qavsh3o1_500.gif
― omar little, Monday, 6 November 2017 18:52 (eight years ago)
What’s that « the definition of insanity... » line again? pic.twitter.com/Gn6sXn5JpX— Remi Brulin (@RBrulin) November 6, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Monday, 6 November 2017 19:08 (eight years ago)
It would only fit the definition if Rubio expected to get different results.
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 6 November 2017 19:12 (eight years ago)
“So my relationship with Shinzo got off to quite a rocky start because I never ran for office, and here I am,” Trump remarked. “But I never ran, so I wasn’t very experienced. And after I had won, everybody was calling me from all over the world. I never knew we had so many countries.”
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Monday, 6 November 2017 19:42 (eight years ago)
OMFG, GTFO
Why can't he just die. Just die. Please. Just die.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Monday, 6 November 2017 19:46 (eight years ago)
It never occurred to me that there were so many countries in the world because none of them are named like Trumpsylvania or Trumpland so why would I even be interested.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Monday, 6 November 2017 19:48 (eight years ago)
back then, world didn't want menow i'm hot, world all on me, i saidback then, world didn't want menow i'm hot, world all on me, i saidback then, world didn't want menow i'm hot, world all on me
― j., Monday, 6 November 2017 19:56 (eight years ago)
Were we expecting a Flynn thing today or no? jw
― Evan, Monday, 6 November 2017 20:13 (eight years ago)
News about Flynn was they had plenty on him to make an arrest, but I haven't seen anything saying an actual arrest would be happening.
― Moodles, Monday, 6 November 2017 20:17 (eight years ago)
An update on Rand's situation! Uh.
NEW: statement from lawyer of alleged @RandPaul attacker, Rene Boucher: #RandPaulAttack pic.twitter.com/AsYIE9kc1j— Brooke Singman (@brookefoxnews) November 6, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 6 November 2017 20:26 (eight years ago)
Some more talk:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/new-details-rand-paul-assault-sneak-attack-possible-political-dispute-n818021?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma
Alleges they hadn't spoken in years, plus a property dispute.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 6 November 2017 20:28 (eight years ago)
I don't condone just indiscriminately beating the shit out of libertarians but I'm uh not exactly shedding tears over here
― Simon H., Monday, 6 November 2017 20:30 (eight years ago)
Rand was out there with a leaf blower moving all the leaves from his yard into the other guy's
― mh, Monday, 6 November 2017 20:31 (eight years ago)
If only there had been a good guy with a gun
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Monday, 6 November 2017 20:36 (eight years ago)
There's probably like a nine inch wide strip abutting the dude's yard that Paul passively aggressively refuses to mow where the grass is like four feet high now and, y'know, at a point enough is enough already.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Monday, 6 November 2017 20:37 (eight years ago)
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/06/john-mccain-injury-achilles-tendon-244599
they're in a shambles over there
― j., Monday, 6 November 2017 21:06 (eight years ago)
drudge siren
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/11/06/in-gop-plan-taxes-go-down-for-most-americans-but-wealthy-get-the-biggest-cut/?hpid=hp_hp-more-top-stories_wonk-tax-410pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.08bade778946
― Οὖτις, Monday, 6 November 2017 21:19 (eight years ago)
By 2027, at least 28 percent of Americans would see their taxes rise, the report says. Many of those taking a hit would be people who make less than $48,000 a year.
Paul Ryan must not believe those folks work hard enough
― curmudgeon, Monday, 6 November 2017 21:53 (eight years ago)
did we ever find out if Trump met the Pen Pineapple Apple Pen guy
― frogbs, Monday, 6 November 2017 22:07 (eight years ago)
This strikes me as imagery straight out of a Mirror Universe Ben Garrison cartoon:
a lot going on in this paragraph: https://t.co/ImQkPtzuHG pic.twitter.com/1xXYnz3hK9— Betsy Woodruff (@woodruffbets) November 6, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Monday, 6 November 2017 22:08 (eight years ago)
We all need a Trump hat to puke in.
― Moodles, Monday, 6 November 2017 22:10 (eight years ago)
I just might have a problem that you'd understand
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Monday, 6 November 2017 22:11 (eight years ago)
― Οὖτις, Monday, 6 November 2017 22:12 (eight years ago)
#BREAKING: ObamaCare signups set new record despite Trump cutting outreach funding https://t.co/aYOK6esxxv pic.twitter.com/QMEBanXKR1— The Hill (@thehill) November 6, 2017
― mookieproof, Monday, 6 November 2017 22:38 (eight years ago)
Ah, clarity.
Rand Paul and neighbor have been sparring over yard waste and leaves blown on each other's lawns for years, a neighbor tells @DrewGriffinCNN— Manu Raju (@mkraju) November 6, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 6 November 2017 22:42 (eight years ago)
Wow, and that's what it took to get a flying tackle out of the blue? And they hadn't even been talking? It sounds like years and years of passive aggression finally blowing up.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 6 November 2017 22:44 (eight years ago)
It sounds like insane excuse making to me!
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 6 November 2017 22:44 (eight years ago)
sounds like Buscemi and the nunchuck guy in Ghost World
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Monday, 6 November 2017 22:45 (eight years ago)
couldn't have happened to a nicer asshole
― Οὖτις, Monday, 6 November 2017 22:48 (eight years ago)
Wow, hadn't heard that the neighbor attacked his asshole, too.
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Monday, 6 November 2017 22:50 (eight years ago)
Knowing how persnickety people get about their lawns, this seems like a fairly plausible situation. I even feel kind of bad for Paul because he seems to have been pretty seriously injured. He's still a colossal asshole though.
― Moodles, Monday, 6 November 2017 23:25 (eight years ago)
why does a senator have time to be out blowing leaves, he should be calling donors.
― correlated noise of conformity (Hunt3r), Monday, 6 November 2017 23:29 (eight years ago)
better for him to be blowing leaves than blowing interns amirite
― Careful with that Ax, Emanuel (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 6 November 2017 23:30 (eight years ago)
CALLED IT
― mh, Monday, 6 November 2017 23:36 (eight years ago)
I have a coworker who explained his batshit crazy neighbor's harassment to me while we were waiting around in his office and this reminded me of it. People are absolutely fucking crazy about neighborhood junk, especially in the suburbs.
― mh, Monday, 6 November 2017 23:37 (eight years ago)
My neighbor and I have dying trees all along the property line. Tree people have quoted thousands of dollars' worth of near-urgent work. I don't like my neighbor very much and am dreading ever having to discuss splitting the costs.
― Careful with that Ax, Emanuel (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 6 November 2017 23:52 (eight years ago)
I feel certain my neighbors have fantasies about attacking me over yard stuff. I'm just thankful I'm not part of an HOA.
― Moodles, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 00:04 (seven years ago)
The transcript of Carter Page at the House Intelligence Committee is out.
https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/carter_page_hpsci_hearing_transcript_nov_2_2017.pdf
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 01:34 (seven years ago)
Wasn't it a big talking point in the Bush era that some percentage of people "don't pay taxes" (i.e. poor people) and that we needed "tax equality" so they payed their fair share and rich people would pay less, etc, etc. Sounds like the same agenda they've just gone back to hiding it.
― The Fortnightly Intruder (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 01:40 (seven years ago)
Adam Schiff Asking Carter Page Whether He's Invoking The Fifth Amendment Is Something Else. pic.twitter.com/aNchV7MnTG— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) November 7, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 01:42 (seven years ago)
https://i.imgur.com/ZfIilSM.png
wow, such an opportunity
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 01:46 (seven years ago)
Thread, but starting summary
#CarterPage transcript for #TrumpRussia invest. is up. You should know:-Met w/ Gazprom/Rosneft-Clovis made him sigh NDA (knew of trip)— Rep. Eric Swalwell (@RepSwalwell) November 7, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 01:46 (seven years ago)
wow at the 5th amendment exchange with schiff
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 01:49 (seven years ago)
the best people, the very smartest
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 01:52 (seven years ago)
i remember first hearing carter page bumble through an interview with judy woodruff last year just thinking lol this guy is going to be great in the coming months
― brimstead, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 02:16 (seven years ago)
Is that a transcript of the full 7 hours !?
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 02:31 (seven years ago)
208 pages! This is like a novella.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 02:32 (seven years ago)
Some nice word salad here
Totally weird ass passage where Schiff notes that Page testimony doesn’t match with his emails. That triggered this on meetings vs outreach. pic.twitter.com/XYzmSqJfHV— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) November 7, 2017
― Moodles, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 02:37 (seven years ago)
The audacity of these knuckleheads, from Trump on down. Just do all this shitty, shady stuff, and when called on it sort of shrug. Tbf, I guess it's worked for Trump all his life.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 02:47 (seven years ago)
Damn. I almost believe that he actually doesn’t understand the illegal or wrongs he has probably committed. He has, like, only “word-concepts.” Those are topically related to the issues under discussion, but also nonsensical. Wordy word salad.
― correlated noise of conformity (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 02:59 (seven years ago)
there are no misdeeds, only opportunities for legal entanglement
― mh, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 03:25 (seven years ago)
Diving into this a bit, I keep reading Carter Page as Dennis Reynolds from "It's Always Sunny ... "
Mr. Page, did you ever communicate with Paul Manafort?
No, never. Well ... not directly.
Not directly? What does that mean? Did you or didn't you?
No, I did not. I did not. Absolutely. I mean, not directly.
And so on. I understand Page's concern, he's overthinking it, knowing that the odds of him being proven a liar or perjurer or criminal or whatever increase the more definitive his claims, and yet ... elsewhere he has no problem categorically denying stuff, or babbling on and on in a confusing and contradictory manner. It's just absolutely bonkers that he would open himself up like this. I mean, the sheer hubris of a guy who would show up without a lawyer, half plead the fifth for fear of prosecution for contradictions in his statements and yet willingly offer to provide copies of emails and stuff that could very well introduce statements that contradict his babbling ...
Anyway, Carter Page, ladies and gentlemen, one of the greatest fictional characters of all time.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 03:42 (seven years ago)
Gentlemen, I'm afraid that I must plead the fifth. But before I do, I feel that it's only right and proper to provide you with a thorough accounting of the thoughts and experiences which have informed my decision. Chapter one...
― Vas the deferens? (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 03:59 (seven years ago)
Yeah, I've been reading the transcript. He constantly talks in circles. The man needs a lawyer, if only to stop him from contradicting himself in consecutive sentences. He reads like a man whose brain is floating like a cork in choppy waters. He recalls all his prepared talking points, but he cannot connect them to the questions he has been asked. It is bizarre.
― A is for (Aimless), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 04:05 (seven years ago)
It seems like he's casting about for ways to deny that his communications with or about Russians were of any substance beyond general goodwill sentiments, but it's clear the documents the committee has contradicts this. It's also striking that the republicans on the committee don't show him any more sympathy than the democrats. They are all annoyed that he hasn't delivered the required documents, that he can't stay on topic or answer questions clearly, and that he's not particularly forthcoming.
― Moodles, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 04:14 (seven years ago)
the spectre of his inane discomfiting grin hovers over all of this shambles
― estela, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 04:30 (seven years ago)
who knew there was an uncanny valley for stupid
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 04:51 (seven years ago)
I've read about 100 pages of the questioning and his answers. So far he's used the phrase "dodgy dossier" about 30 times in his testimony, usually gratuitously, during a digression of self-pity. It's like a magic incantation designed to inoculate him from harm. Very Trumpian of him.
― A is for (Aimless), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 06:36 (seven years ago)
I’m guessing it’s a term he picked up from Nigel farage https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Dossier
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 06:48 (seven years ago)
This explains why he said he wanted the transcript to be made public right away.
― brotherlovesdub, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 06:51 (seven years ago)
Just heard NPR refer to current times as "the golden age of grievance."
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 12:57 (seven years ago)
duels are illegal now so nah
― Simon H., Tuesday, 7 November 2017 12:58 (seven years ago)
I think we have transcended the formality of duels.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 13:07 (seven years ago)
to our detriment
― Simon H., Tuesday, 7 November 2017 13:07 (seven years ago)
That Page transcript is like Joseph Heller meets Lewis Carroll.
Were you employed by the Trump campaign?No, I was just a volunteer.Well, who brought you onboard?I - I mean, I just volunteered there.So who did you answer to? Someone had to invite you onboard the team?No one, because I was not on the team, just a volunteer. Etc.
Or:
Who approved your trip to Moscow?I didn't need approval, because I was just a private citizen not officially working for the campaign.So you didn't ask permission to go to Moscow?Not directly, no.What does that mean, not directly?I mean, I emailed key members of Trump's team to get permission, if that's what you mean, and they said yes - I can get you copies of the email - but other than that, no, no direct contact. We want to be very clear here. Did you ask permission to go to Moscow?No. OK, were you in communication with anyone on the Trump team about your Russian trip?No, not directly. I mean, did email them to ask if I could go to Moscow, but other than that, no, no contact.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 13:21 (seven years ago)
good god, that last one
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 13:23 (seven years ago)
the "hello, mister thompson" gif doesn't even come close
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 13:24 (seven years ago)
This guy takes stupidity to a whole other level.
― Terry Micawber (Tom D.), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 13:25 (seven years ago)
i keep marveling at his apparently sincere belief that the double-jeopardy clause in the constitution covers the court of public opinion and random vigilantes. so really you can't ever be tried at all, since you might later be double-jeopardied by extralegal forces! which is irrelevant anyway since he is not on trial. but it's very important that he explain all this to congress. he must be baffled as to how they don't know all this stuff already.
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 13:27 (seven years ago)
I read through some of those Carter Page transcripts...I mean, I wasn't actually reading them but I was, y'know, scanning the words with my eyes and processing the constituent meaning with my brain, but I never actually read them. Did I read read them? Of course. I never said otherwise. But did I read read them? Of course not. Don't be silly.
― Your welcome. (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 13:29 (seven years ago)
TBF, he probably has a degree of brain damage induced by a lifetime of people viciously shaking him and screaming 'JUST SAY WHAT YOU MEAN, CARTER!'
― Your welcome. (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 13:32 (seven years ago)
https://www.comedy.co.uk/images/library/people/900x450/w/w1a_will.jpg
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 13:50 (seven years ago)
xpost, just to be clear, I made those up! But it pretty much capture the spirit of Carter Page.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 14:01 (seven years ago)
omg well joke's on me but tbf they were horribly plausible
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 14:05 (seven years ago)
Like, you just can't make this stuff up, which is why it makes it so easy to make up. The "plead the fifth" back and forth really conveys the madness. Or the fact that even pinheaded Gowdy, an erstwhile ally, is from the start skeptical and almost adversarial when responding to Page's nutty rabbit hole dives.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 14:07 (seven years ago)
He is so sneaky in his omissions - and inclusions - it's baffling. When asked who invited him to Russian, his response is "I was just invited." As if that either answers it or doesn't raise more questions. Or his repeated declarations of "I just want to be careful" or "not directly," as if allowing rhetorical wiggle room would withstand legal scrutiny.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 14:09 (seven years ago)
1/ Carter Page’s testimony is a painful reminder of the importance of hiring an attorney when you’re under investigation.— Renato Mariotti (@renato_mariotti) November 7, 2017
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 14:11 (seven years ago)
Though again, to be fair, I actually understand where Page is coming from. He's saying first that some documents he provides might contradict his previous statements, which would be incriminating. And then second he's saying that because (he claims) some documents were illegally leaked, producing those documents would make him a post facto accomplice to a crime. I'm not a lawyer, but a good lawyer would have expressed this stuff better than he could, because Page of all these chuckleheads has the worst poker face and looks and acts like a squirrely liar even when he could be telling the truth.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 14:16 (seven years ago)
I think it's important to be completely transparent, but also that there should be limits on complete transparency.
― Your welcome. (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 14:18 (seven years ago)
He's basically saying he is being completely transparent, or trying to be as transparent as possible, but that it's not possible to be completely transparent and that's why he's not being transparent. At one point they ask him if he ever goes by any alias and he outright says no. Then the next breath he says he does have a couple of aliases for the sake of security. Same sort of things with his cell phones. Do you have more than one phone? No, absolutely not. I mean, yes, I do, maybe three, but that's to save on phone bills when I'm in Russia.If this guy were a b-list supervillain his name would be Red Flag.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 14:21 (seven years ago)
“there are no misdeeds, only opportunities for legal entanglement” is all time great summation imo mh
― correlated noise of conformity (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 14:48 (seven years ago)
kind of dreading this VA governor's race, and what a Gillespie win is gonna mean for the midterms
― frogbs, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 14:54 (seven years ago)
He hasn't won yet
― Moodles, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 15:10 (seven years ago)
always expect the worst, you'll be disappointed infrequently
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 15:12 (seven years ago)
It was... a trifle harrowing to be back in the school gym, with about the same level of cautious optimism, as a year ago.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 15:20 (seven years ago)
even if the VA Gov race ends in disappointment, today still may be fairly positive for democrats. This is a pretty good round up on what else is happening:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/11/7/16612630/new-jersey-governor-election
― Moodles, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 15:25 (seven years ago)
can't speak for LC, but clearly Heller was inspired by the Carter Pages of his time.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 15:27 (seven years ago)
Asked during a Seoul news conference whether he would entertain “extreme vetting” on guns, Trump appeared irritated by the question and suggested it was not appropriate to talk about “in the heart of South Korea.”
He then answered by saying “if we did what you are suggesting it would have made no difference three days ago.” Devin Patrick Kelley opened fire with a semiautomatic rifle, killing 26 people in a church.
Another man, Stephen Willeford, later grabbed his own gun and exchanged fire with Kelley outside the church. Police found Kelley dead of a self-inflicted gunshot wound, but authorities said Willeford helped stop Kelley and called him a “hero.”
Trump referred to Willeford as a “brave man” and said “if he had not had a gun, instead of having 26 dead, you would have had hundreds more dead. … It’s not going to help.”
“You look at the city with the strongest gun laws in our nation, is Chicago,” Trump replied. “And Chicago is a disaster. It's a total disaster.... If this man didn't have a gun or rifle, you'd be talking about a much worse situation in the great state of Texas.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/11/07/trump-says-hundreds-more-might-have-died-in-texas-shooting-if-gun-laws-were-tougher/
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 15:41 (seven years ago)
“You look at the city with the strongest gun laws in our nation, is Chicago,” He really loves repeating this lie
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 15:45 (seven years ago)
Oops
Wow: JD Gordon tells NBC's @vmsalama he tried to stop Page from going to Moscow, but Page went around him "directly to campaign leadership."— Ken Dilanian (@KenDilanianNBC) November 7, 2017
― Moodles, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 15:45 (seven years ago)
600 people live in Sutherland Springs. Trump is pretty much suggesting that he would have massacred the entire town.
― frogbs, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 15:48 (seven years ago)
^the movie in his head
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 15:49 (seven years ago)
"until one man.... with a Colt .45 in his BVDs.... jumped in his '03 celica and started firing out the window..."
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 15:53 (seven years ago)
On the tradition of 'patriotic leaders' who hate their fellow citizens:
https://theintercept.com/2017/11/05/john-kelly-loves-america-he-just-hates-americans/
Lots of feedback on this is not that John Kelly doesn't detest Americans, but that he's absolutely right to do so https://t.co/yAlDdwiD8n pic.twitter.com/W70wtb2Q1S— Jon Schwarz (@schwarz) November 6, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 15:54 (seven years ago)
Donald Trump 'tells Japanese emperor mass shootings can happen anywhere' — in country with no mass shootings
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/donald-trump-japan-emperor-akihito-texas-mass-shooting-visit-shinzo-abe-sutherland-springs-a8041391.html
― Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 16:34 (seven years ago)
xp imo there's a fairly common sentiment that that masses are not only unwashed but dumb and if they get screwed over they deserve it
― mh, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 16:34 (seven years ago)
hundreds more dead. … It’s not going to help
so now anything no worse than las vegas is marked as a win
― j., Tuesday, 7 November 2017 16:39 (seven years ago)
baby steps
― Evan, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 16:49 (seven years ago)
― mh, Tuesday, November 7, 2017
common on ILX Too
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 16:54 (seven years ago)
people need to realize that spiting the unwashed dumb masses by denying them basic amenities actually fucks over the whole society
the whole "you don't work as hard as me so you get shitty healthcare" attitude is backward and fucks up hospitals for all people, serious cutting off the nose to spite the face move
― mh, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 16:56 (seven years ago)
He really loves repeating this lie
Seriously, what a shithead. For those who didn't follow, Chicago had pretty strict gun laws (as did/does DC?) but whether or not they were effective in the face of weapons brought over the border from Indiana, they were weakened by a legal challenge brought by the NRA.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 17:00 (seven years ago)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/danalexander/2017/11/07/the-case-of-wilbur-ross-phantom-2-billion/#1364ca767515
― j., Tuesday, 7 November 2017 17:01 (seven years ago)
the irony of him saying that in a country that literally never has mass shootings hasn't really occurred to him has it
― frogbs, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 17:04 (seven years ago)
― mh, Tuesday, November 7, 2017 10:56 AM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
You start talking about other people and my eyes just glaze over until you say my name again.
There's a lot that people need to realize about the benefits of not treating their fellow citizens like shit but, looking back on centuries of history, I'm not holding my breath.
― Your welcome. (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 17:05 (seven years ago)
Duh. Samurai warriors don't do "mass shootings", obviously. Pay attention.
― Evan, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 17:06 (seven years ago)
Charles Pierce has the right idea regarding the Page transcript:
I found that the best way to read it was to dim all the lights and play all my Hawkwind albums really loud.
― Moodles, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 17:12 (seven years ago)
xpost Yeah, man, Japan is infamous for mass samurai sword slayings. Ever see Seven Samurai? So many deaths! And that was just seven! Sad!
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 17:12 (seven years ago)
Trump is an idiot and doesn't do irony but just for the sake of historical accuracy - Japan has had mass murders
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 17:14 (seven years ago)
"It's not our problem, it's Godzilla's"
― Evan, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 17:21 (seven years ago)
murders yes but not mass shootings
last year they had a spike in gang-related shootings, which brought the total fatalities from 8 to 27
― frogbs, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 17:25 (seven years ago)
Aum Shuriya
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 17:26 (seven years ago)
they have 27/33000th as much freedom as we do tho
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 17:26 (seven years ago)
xposts Yes, there was (for instance) the horrifying mass murder at the disabled care home last year. This doesn't seem to be the point Trump is making, though.
― Your welcome. (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 17:28 (seven years ago)
imagine if that guy had an AR-15 instead of a bag of knives, or better yet don't
― frogbs, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 17:30 (seven years ago)
yeah I know, I'll let it go
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 17:30 (seven years ago)
Seth Abramson's epic Twitter threads are usually more than I'm willing to wade through, but this lengthy review of the Page transcript is pretty illuminating.
(THREAD) This thread offers comments on—and analysis of—Carter Page's recent testimony before the House Intel Committee (transcript, 243pp). pic.twitter.com/AZoa7i5XBE— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) November 7, 2017
― Moodles, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 18:53 (seven years ago)
every Carter Page expression suggests such euphoria, such happiness with the way the world works
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:02 (seven years ago)
Wow, that thread. lol at the assumption that the FBI could probably arrest Page today if they wanted to, or could have months ago, but preferred to just keep him around to occasionally hit up for damning testimony. Because that close read ... jeebus. Like, the mention that Page told Hope Hicks what he was up to, and that means obviously assumes that Hicks told Trump? Just damning stuff.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:14 (seven years ago)
wormtongue
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:18 (seven years ago)
was way smarter than Page
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:19 (seven years ago)
this idiot can barely string a sentence together
with trump as saruman to putin's sauron, the internet (facebook, twitter, news comment sections) one multi-faceted palantir. so fucked up
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:20 (seven years ago)
is the ring the oppo dump?
― Evan, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:23 (seven years ago)
apparently even Trey Gowdy was astonished:
Gowdy: All right, I’ve written down four different words. I didn’t think I’d ever be going through this with anyone, but we’ve got to, I guess. You seem to draw a distinction between a meeting, a greeting, a conversation, and you hearing a speech. So to the extent you may have said that you have met with senior members of the Russian government or legislators in Russia, were those meetings, greetings, conversations, or were you sitting in the audience listening?
Page: The greetings were to Arkady Dvorkovich and perhaps – I believe – there were a couple of legislators, again, in the audience, you know, people whose kids were graduating from this top university, like if you go to Yale’s commencement, or Stanford’s commencement, and there may be some senior government officials – or the University of Pennsylvania’s commencement – who said hello very briefly. But, so meetings and greetings or, sorry, greetings and brief conversations would be each of those. In terms of listening to the speech, which is the primary focus and the primary thing I was driving at with these incredible insights, was really the primary focus of where I got my information.
Gowdy: So what you were trying to communicate is that you had derived great insight from having listened to someone make a speech?
Page: Certainly, yes, as I have from Donald J. Trump during the campaign.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:24 (seven years ago)
does that make Adam Schiff Frodo?
― Moodles, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:24 (seven years ago)
seth abramson is a mensch level grifter
― -_- (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:24 (seven years ago)
xphttp://i1.wp.com/bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/the-ring-true.pngpictured: Huckabee Sanders stepping away from the podium
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:25 (seven years ago)
I hope Page doesn't get indicted, he's probably my favorite character in the whole series
― frogbs, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:25 (seven years ago)
Page is a bot come to life, right
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:26 (seven years ago)
Maybe! But he read the fucking thing and highlighted the best bits, so good for you, grifter.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:27 (seven years ago)
Jim, are you saying the thread is BS? It seemed reasonable to me, perhaps a little overheated?
― Moodles, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:27 (seven years ago)
49/ BOMBSHELL #1: Page *lied to FBI investigators and Congress*. He in fact *told the campaign he had a private meeting with the Deputy PM*.
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:28 (seven years ago)
37/ Rooney and Gowdy let him testify, at one point, "by narrative"—which is when you let a liar or troubled person just talk themselves out.
38/ It's the equivalent—in trial advocacy—of throwing up your hands and saying, "I don't give a sh*t anymore—just say what you want to say."
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:28 (seven years ago)
i believe the bailiff of twitter has indicted abramson for treason and i take no pleasure in that
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:29 (seven years ago)
The implications of this are STAGGERING. Page didn't go to Russia as a "private citizen"—he lied. The campaign and Trump lied. Remember: PAGE briefed HICKS *before* going to Moscow, then emailed the top brass his after-action report—surely, again, to HICKS. So Trump knew. Page admits withholding that smoking-gun document from Congress under what—I'll tell you—is a totally invalid Fifth Amendment exercise.
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:30 (seven years ago)
has anyone ever started a twitter thread that just kept going and never stopped?
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:30 (seven years ago)
Let's ask Carter Page!
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:30 (seven years ago)
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, November 7, 2017 11:29 AM (fifty-two seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
hahaha
― -_- (jim in vancouver), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:30 (seven years ago)
Yeah, it began last year and I still haven't woken up
― Evan, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:31 (seven years ago)
BOMBSHELL #2: Page admits meeting multiple Kremlin agents and discussing Kremlin "outreach"—offers to cooperate—with *top Trump aides*. Rep. Conaway says on the record that Page has wrongly withheld docs from the Committee's majority to the point at which he's "offended." Page reveals he met with the FBI five or six times—at a minimum—in 2016 and 2017. Wow—that is a *lot* of times.
67/ Though to be clear, he says Russia didn't do anything whatsoever during the election, so his crazy claim about Steele isn't surprising.
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:32 (seven years ago)
tweet storms with capitalized names are like reading a shitty first draft of a screenplay
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:33 (seven years ago)
please can we stop posting abramson stuff. find someone else saying the same thing who doesn't have a record of menschianism, or silo it off in a quick poll about Russia and Donald Trump.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:35 (seven years ago)
or the high sherriff of ILX will charge you all with conspiracy against the US and i take no pleasure in that
Carter Page reminds me of the time when my 21-year-old roommate was successfully handling a visit from the cops re: a noise complaint when my underage & massively-drunken self butted in with what he was convinced was a much more compelling argument for turning the police away.
― Your welcome. (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:40 (seven years ago)
otm – Carter Page is every dumbfuck friend of a friend who makes a situation under control worse
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:42 (seven years ago)
'Offsifser, jusslemme esplain for minnit. M'pleadin' a fifth.'
― Your welcome. (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:42 (seven years ago)
his phd reflects appallingly on the SOAS
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:43 (seven years ago)
phd defense by narrative
― you are juror number 144 and we will excuse you (Sufjan Grafton), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 19:51 (seven years ago)
What I like about the Page transcript - and there is so much to like, beginning with how "The Page Transcript" would make a great name for an indie movie, short story of prog band - is that you don't have to be some sort of expert to read it and catch him fucking up. It's all there, one after the other. Like, he says he was wary of going to Russia and wanted to be careful, and Gowdy asks him, if you needed to be "super" careful, then why did you even go? And Page's response is literally "Because I'm trying to live my life." I so wanted him to tag a "maaaaaan" on there at the end. The Page abides.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:02 (seven years ago)
"short story or prog band," I messed up my own joke, thanks Carter Page, Ph.d/USM.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:03 (seven years ago)
Carter Page, the Unstoppable Sex Machine
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:04 (seven years ago)
Carter Page, Ph.d/USM.
I gave credit where credit was due, dude worked hard for those letters.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:05 (seven years ago)
lol I completely missed that, sorry
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:06 (seven years ago)
https://thumbs.gfycat.com/LightMediocreAfricanpiedkingfisher-small.gif
― omar little, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:06 (seven years ago)
the Chris Hayes interview from earlier this year is one of the most batshit pieces of TV I've seen outside "Pee-Wee's Playhouse."
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:08 (seven years ago)
it is p baffling that he has a doctorate
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:08 (seven years ago)
At this point I'm not sure we can even be positive of that.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:09 (seven years ago)
xpost I had no idea and genuinely thought I was misreading when I kept seeing them refer to him as 'Dr. Page' in the transcripts.
So a PhD is basically worthless, is my takeaway here.
― Bernard Crunderdunder (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:10 (seven years ago)
I feel like every time I had to read Schiff say "Dr. Page", I died inside a little
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:12 (seven years ago)
he's a dignity wraith, dead inside
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:13 (seven years ago)
Karl Malone, have at this
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:15 (seven years ago)
what's baffling is that no one has looked it up and proved that his thesis was plagiarized yet
― j., Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:16 (seven years ago)
Dr. Carter Page is like the name of the evil scientist with a dark secret who tags along with the mission and ultimately betrays his fellow man by secretly impregnating them with alien spores that will then grow up, burst out of their chest and vote GOP.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:16 (seven years ago)
Photoshoppers, have at this:
http://props.steinschneider.com/aliens/carter_burke/carter_burke_04.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:17 (seven years ago)
Didn't know Trump University gave out doctorates
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:18 (seven years ago)
that transcript reminds me of when Trump said he was sure that Russia didn't interfere because he asked Putin twice, but phrased the question differently each time. I guess that's the sort of expert interrogation technique that actually works on his own employees.
― frogbs, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:21 (seven years ago)
has anyone seen page and trump together? we don't know for sure trump isn't page without the wig on
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:21 (seven years ago)
He's more accredited that Gorka, but does he have a sweet Mustang with vanity plates
― mh, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:22 (seven years ago)
it's already top notch, lol! he is like a really annoying cartoon character
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:38 (seven years ago)
GOP confused that their "middle class tax cut" bill does not actually focus on the middle class
interesting that Manchin is kind of holding his fire, I don't think that's going to last
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:45 (seven years ago)
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/07/gop-on-defensive-analysis-tax-hike-244642
like that quote is basically him setting himself up for a "Trump lied to me to my face" moment later
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:47 (seven years ago)
All these choads who think they're not going to get fucked over by trump and then end up getting fucked over by trump are like the president in the 70s battlestar galactica pilot when he realises the cylons have slaughtered the humans at the peace rallies and baltar is now suspiciously nowhere to be found
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:50 (seven years ago)
apologies if my analogy is a little obscure
Trump is not as smart as Baltar
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:51 (seven years ago)
Those facts versus Adelson, Koch and Ricketts ads. Saw one during the World Series
“What’s in it for you?” asks a new ad, reportedly backed by $10 million, from the “45 Committee,” founded by Adelson and Ricketts. Axios, in a report “presented by Koch Industries,” says the 45 Committee will spend “at least $10 million” on the ad. “The Republican tax cut saves middle class families more than $1,200 a year, according to independent analysis. The first $24,000 of your income would be tax free,” the announcer says, over images of a factory floor. “It will simplify your taxes and close loopholes so everybody pays their fair share. More money in your pocket. A stronger economy. That’s what’s in it for you.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/whats-in-it-for-johnny-lunchbucket/2017/11/03/d867a758-c08e-11e7-8444-a0d4f04b89eb_story.html?utm_term=.a665ba47d88f
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:55 (seven years ago)
fully expect dueling ads about this, Dems will need to be mobilized to call their Reps/Senators just like w healthcare
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:57 (seven years ago)
How about: it's mighty rich how all of these people who've been baffling proponents of getting hit in the nuts with a spiked bat are aghast at the realization of how much it sucks once their own nuts are on the dresser. BLAOW.
― Bernard Crunderdunder (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:58 (seven years ago)
$1200 savings, why that's enough to buy a car, or a family vacation
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 20:59 (seven years ago)
it's mighty rich
appropriate analogy
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 21:06 (seven years ago)
― Οὖτις
this seriously gives me comfort
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 21:08 (seven years ago)
imo emo philips should play page in the movie
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 21:16 (seven years ago)
Was reminded this morning that there is another debt ceiling debate imminent in December, when they are also working on taxes, DACA (supposedly) and god knows whatever other messes they have to clean up. Person basically said the Dems should hold out for pie in the sky, everything from a DACA fix to funding the ACA to not defunding Planned Parenthood and definitely not funding a fucking border wall. The GOP can't keep the government open without Dem votes, yet this is the rare shutdown debate that will take place with both a GOP congress and a GOP White House, so if it goes belly up and the government seems like it will shut down, the Dems can just say "go fuck yourself, you're the majority government, why don't you govern? But if you need our help it's going to cost you."
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 21:33 (seven years ago)
that strategy is definitely likely, Pelosi is good at holding her caucus together and relishes twisting the knife on Ryan
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 21:38 (seven years ago)
Brady's bill pummeled by Club For Growth for not cutting taxes for the rich *enough*
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/conservatives-demand-changes-to-house-gop-tax-bill/2017/11/07/e70046a4-c3cb-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-more-top-stories_taxreform-340pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.3fd6100189b8
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 21:51 (seven years ago)
Club For Growth would probably consider a fully regressive income tax, with zero tax on income above $1 million, rising to 40% on income up to $50,000/year, to be a bold experiment in unleashing the power of capitalism to expand the economy through reinvestment and wealth creation.
― A is for (Aimless), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 22:03 (seven years ago)
True conservatives will always be disappointed that the trauma they inflict upon the poor is insufficiently cruel.
― Bernard Crunderdunder (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 22:39 (seven years ago)
facebook reminded me of something i posted on this in 2013:
The dual process of cutting both taxes and social programs involved, however, a striking difference in the assumptions of the motivations governing the behavior of the affluent and of the poor. For those in the upper brackets, and for those managing corporate decision-making processes, the underlying assumption of the tax cuts was that the creation of new tax incentives would encourage more work, more investment, and more savings, that the best way to achieve sought-after behavior is to reward it, in this case with lowered tax rates on corporations, savings, executive stock options, and estates. At the bottom of the scale, the dominant assumption behind social program cuts was precisely the opposite: the best way to achieve increased work is by making life tougher.– Thomas Byrne EdsallThe New Politics of Inequality (1984)
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 23:03 (seven years ago)
Some thoughts:
1) I find it funny whenever Trump meets with people (or countries) he's bad-mouthed and turns into a total pussy.2) Wouldn't it be great if master tweeter Trump totally falters and fails with his new expanded word count?3) At the Menendez trial in NJ, apparently a juror asked the judge what a Senator is.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 7 November 2017 23:05 (seven years ago)
...and that juror's name...Donald J. Trump...and now you know the rest of the storyGood Day
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 23:07 (seven years ago)
Trump meets with people (or countries) he's bad-mouthed and turns into a total pussy.
He has two default positions. He's either all negativity and threats, or else all compliments and flattery. He alternates these approaches at whim, which he views as the very foundation of his superb negotiating skills.
― A is for (Aimless), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 23:40 (seven years ago)
He alternates these approaches at whim, which he views as the very foundation of his superb negotiating skills.
No, he's a giant pussy who retreats every time he comes face-to-face with someone he's shit-talked, which he and his sycophantic cultists then retcon into "superb negotiating skills."
― grawlix (unperson), Tuesday, 7 November 2017 23:47 (seven years ago)
he's a rich fuck asshole who's dragged us all back to high school to gawk at the new car his parents bought him for his 16th birthday (he did nothing to deserve). that's how mature we are as a "meritocratic" country at the moment and have been for some time
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:03 (seven years ago)
US Attorney has dismissed the case against the woman who laughed during AG Sessions' confirmation hearing, @LauraAJarrett reports.— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) November 7, 2017
― j., Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:04 (seven years ago)
anyone else wasting their evening watching the results come in?
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:10 (seven years ago)
bye, fucker: https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/07/lobiondo-retire-congress-244647
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:12 (seven years ago)
Syria signs Paris Accords, US is now the only holdout way to go Two Scoops, may your bloated corpse be used as a raft by climate refugees
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:15 (seven years ago)
nyt currently estimating dems win va by 4-5%
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:36 (seven years ago)
What, already?
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:36 (seven years ago)
"nyt currently estimating dems win va by 4-5%"
which race? gillespe is up from what I just saw.
― akm, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:38 (seven years ago)
NoVA isn’t in yet
― YouTube_-_funy_cats.flv (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:44 (seven years ago)
they model per-precinct based on previous elections and extrapolate from there
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:45 (seven years ago)
https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/virginia-governor-election-gillespie-northam
Projection: Ralph Northam (D) has been elected next governor of VA, defeating Ed Gillespie (R). #VAGOV— Dave Wasserman (@Redistrict) November 8, 2017
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:45 (seven years ago)
the GOP candidate usually dominates in southern Virginia in early raw votes, I remember reading a few years ago.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:46 (seven years ago)
apparently turnout in trump country is low
In Bannon's view, Deplorables turned out, owing to statues + immigration. Trump voters did their job. Suburbs are GOP establishment's problem. #VAGovRace— Robert Draper (@DraperRobert) November 8, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:47 (seven years ago)
(huge sigh of relief)
― sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:47 (seven years ago)
whats funny is all the pundits warning 'well governor's races aren't easily bellweathers for the next national election' when shit was getting super close will be forgotten with the dems win and everyones going to be saying this is predictive of the future.
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:52 (seven years ago)
Steve Kornacki just announced that Gillespie is getting buried in north Virginia, "worse than Donald Trump" last year.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:55 (seven years ago)
That’s uh....really early to be calling this
Landslide would be amazing though, considering Northampton is basically a wet noodle
― frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:55 (seven years ago)
a trans candidate and a socialist also got elected to the house of delegates
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:59 (seven years ago)
i'm all about stomping these clowns in the neck tbrr xp
― YouTube_-_funy_cats.flv (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:59 (seven years ago)
Seeing rumblings that DeVos may be on her way out at DOE.
― Moodles, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 00:59 (seven years ago)
https://i.imgur.com/TxIt2Rz.png
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:00 (seven years ago)
it's amazing how much we've accomplished just by changing the thread title
― Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:00 (seven years ago)
Bye, fucker https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/07/ted-poe-texas-congress-2018-244668
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:01 (seven years ago)
xpost why would that asshole even want to be at DoE? she's a billionaire, and it must be hell on Earth for her. see also: Trump.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:02 (seven years ago)
"These economic royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the institutions of America. What they really complain of is that we seek to take away their power. Our allegiance to American institutions requires the overthrow of this kind of power.
"In vain they seek to hide behind the Flag and the Constitution. In their blindness they forget what the Flag and the Constitution stand for. Now, as always, they stand for democracy, not tyranny; for freedom, not subjection; and against a dictatorship by mob rule and the over-privileged alike." -- Franklin D. Roosevelt
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:03 (seven years ago)
is it unusual for so many departures like this? will they be replaced by real nuts?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:03 (seven years ago)
No idea how people are reading my DeVos profile and concluding that she's soon to resign. Did they miss this part? https://t.co/IhoXdcG2n5 pic.twitter.com/QrTbpUGpQ6— Tim Alberta (@TimAlberta) November 7, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:03 (seven years ago)
in texas, yes xp
If turnout sucks in 2018, yes.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:04 (seven years ago)
This is all Junior’s fault for telling everyone to vote tomorrow
― frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:04 (seven years ago)
― Moodles, Tuesday, November 7, 2017 6:59 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Come on, you're pulling my leg, Christmas is still weeks away yet.
― Bernard Crunderdunder (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:06 (seven years ago)
Trump voters did their job. Suburbs are GOP establishment's problem.
I love this point of view. I hope that in all future elections, the GOP gets the enthusiastic participation of the 25% of voters who love Trump and his acolytes, together with the scattered, half-hearted support of a few other GOP voters who can barely stomach Trumpism, while all the rest of the GOP stays home.
That's a great way to lose elections and I endorse it as the GOP strategy from here forward.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:07 (seven years ago)
NBC calling race for Northam
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:09 (seven years ago)
US Politics November 2017: Dems clinging to preliminary VA Gov result. #changewecanbelievein
― Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:09 (seven years ago)
weird to me how VAAG and VALG are both currently red while gov is blue by 2.5 pts and growing i mean how does THAT work
― YouTube_-_funy_cats.flv (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:13 (seven years ago)
Gillespie down even in counties that barely went Trump.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:14 (seven years ago)
how are dems doing in other races, both in VA (state house) and around the country, in places like NJ, Maine, etc.?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:14 (seven years ago)
DeVos may be on her way out at DOE.
Although her replacement might be just as wretched, the constant churning and disarray in the cabinet and other high positions will tend to limit the damage being done. That and all the unfilled nominations just below cabinet level.
By contrast, the Reaganites came in well-organized and with guns blazing in 1981.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:15 (seven years ago)
Stomp These Clowns on the Neck 2020
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:16 (seven years ago)
FOX News calls race for Northam
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:16 (seven years ago)
And AP, etc. What about other races? Let the good times roll?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:17 (seven years ago)
Murphy's got it in a walk in NJ. Guadagno (who was Christie's #2 for all eight years) was down something like 14 points in the final poll. She's done for sure.
― grawlix (unperson), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:18 (seven years ago)
― Josh in Chicago
Kornacki also reporting that House of Delegates safe seats on GOP side looking shaky
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:18 (seven years ago)
Maine had medicaid expansion on the ballot, right?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:18 (seven years ago)
maine currently voting for expansion 63/36 but with almost nothing reporting
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:21 (seven years ago)
Lol cnn calling Virginia for Northam, tonight rules
― jjjusten, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:21 (seven years ago)
https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/maine-ballot-measure-medicaid-expansion
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:23 (seven years ago)
NJ called for murphy
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:25 (seven years ago)
#DanicaRoemA transgender candidate just beat the author of the anti trans bathroom bill!!
― sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:28 (seven years ago)
bravo!
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:33 (seven years ago)
VA HOUSE OF DELEGATES: Democrats have already picked up 11 seats (2, 10, 13, 31, 32, 42, 50, 51, 67, 72, 73) and need 6 more for control. There are ~13 more GOP seats still in play.— Dave Wasserman (@Redistrict) November 8, 2017
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:35 (seven years ago)
he's posting more detail on the 538
I didn’t think I’d be saying this at 8:30 p.m., but Virginia has been swept up in such a Democratic tidal wave that Democrats may have a legitimate chance to win the 17 seats they need to pick up the House of Delegates.By my quick, rough count, Democrats have already picked up 11 seats (districts 2, 10, 13, 31, 32, 42, 50, 51, 67, 72, 72) and they still have a chance in 13 more. They’ve already pulled off a few upsets, unseating GOP incumbents in the outer suburbs of Northern Virginia like Dels. Jackson Miller, Rich Anderson and Randy Minchew. But they’ve also picked up two seats in suburban Richmond and have a chance at a third. They’re also knocking on the door in several Hampton Roads districts. This is just a massive night for Democrats.
By my quick, rough count, Democrats have already picked up 11 seats (districts 2, 10, 13, 31, 32, 42, 50, 51, 67, 72, 72) and they still have a chance in 13 more. They’ve already pulled off a few upsets, unseating GOP incumbents in the outer suburbs of Northern Virginia like Dels. Jackson Miller, Rich Anderson and Randy Minchew. But they’ve also picked up two seats in suburban Richmond and have a chance at a third. They’re also knocking on the door in several Hampton Roads districts. This is just a massive night for Democrats.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:36 (seven years ago)
― sleeve, Tuesday, November 7, 2017 5:28 PM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
awesome
― brimstead, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:36 (seven years ago)
Of course:
Gillespie folks blaming Trump https://t.co/ywpOySnMLO— Peter Hamby (@PeterHamby) November 8, 2017
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:37 (seven years ago)
Prescient!
Ed Gillespie worked hard but did not embrace me or what I stand for. Don’t forget, Republicans won 4 out of 4 House seats, and with the economy doing record numbers, we will continue to win, even bigger than before!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 8, 2017
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:43 (seven years ago)
forgot norham is the dr who called trump a narcissistic maniac
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDonPK5bJoM
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:43 (seven years ago)
what is trump assuming he 'stands for' like gillespie ran on white nationalism basically right
― global tetrahedron, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:49 (seven years ago)
Trump stands for overturning anything good Barack Obama accomplished. Therefore, I have no problem with people running as anti Trump candidates, because that means they prefer Obama policies to his.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 01:51 (seven years ago)
very curious about whatever repercussions lead into 2018.
Again, I never thought I’d be saying this, but by my back-of-the-envelope count, Democrats are currently in the lead to pick up Virginia’s House of Delegates. They started the night with 34 of 100 seats and have already picked up 12 GOP-held seats. There are eight more GOP-held seats that are still too close to call, and Democrats are currently in the lead in six of them. If those leads hold, the speaker of Virginia’s House of Delegates in 2018 will be a Democrat. Given the GOP’s aggressive gerrymander of Virginia’s delegate districts in 2011, this is what you’d call a tidal wave.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:03 (seven years ago)
Ed Gillespie worked hard but did not embrace me
this kind of shit... supremely childish and redolent of dictators, hooray
― brimstead, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:09 (seven years ago)
i know, what else is new
if gillespie would have won, trump would have taken credit for it. he didn't, so he gets shit on
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:15 (seven years ago)
one thing I wonder about a lot of Trump voters, is down the line when it's clear it was a con they won't stop supporting him in theory but when he's done do they just drift off from voting on general? his whole campaign was such a cult of personality
― Universal LULU Nation (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:17 (seven years ago)
Given the GOP’s aggressive gerrymander of Virginia’s delegate districts in 2011, this is what you’d call a tidal wave.
excellent news from VA tonight, obv. imagine a world where the districts weren't gerrymandering and voter suppression measures didn't exist. it would be an interesting exercise to find out how fair elections would work out in this country
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:17 (seven years ago)
whoa at philly's new DA
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:19 (seven years ago)
MINNEAPOLIS
― sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:25 (seven years ago)
can't find a link, first out trans woman of color elected to public office in America
city council
― sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:26 (seven years ago)
https://www.advocate.com/politics/2017/11/07/trans-woman-andrea-jenkins-elected-minneapolis-city-council
― brimstead, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:44 (seven years ago)
Check the timestamps on Fox news and Trumps tweet. Pretty sure that's very close to what Brit Hume said right around the same time.
― brotherlovesdub, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:46 (seven years ago)
when he's done do they just drift off from voting on general?
good riddance
― j., Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:47 (seven years ago)
Apparently Trump Korea speech in progress is, no surprise, an embarrassment.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:53 (seven years ago)
where are people watching?
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:55 (seven years ago)
nevermind:
http://thehill.com/video/administration/359290-watch-live-trump-speaks-to-south-korean-national-assembly
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:56 (seven years ago)
I saw it streaming on Washington Post.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:56 (seven years ago)
this night's election returns were too hopeful; i need to destroy any positive feelings by watching a live trump speech
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:57 (seven years ago)
Deep state has definitely been sneaking this guy plenty of McDonald's fried apple pie.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:59 (seven years ago)
scummy Goldman Sachs Dem elected NJ guv! Yay?
what if Yam reaction to being electorally embarrassed is starting a 'conventional' war with NK?
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 02:59 (seven years ago)
the new philly DA https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/17/us/philadelphia-krasner-district-attorney-police.html?_r=1
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:01 (seven years ago)
scummy Goldman Sachs Dem elected NJ guv
yeah, kind of puts a damper on that one
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:01 (seven years ago)
He wants to legalize weed and make the state's minimum wage $15 an hour. Which of those is the official Goldman Sachs position? I forget.
― grawlix (unperson), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:04 (seven years ago)
alright!!
BOOM! local news makes it official: Medicaid will be expanded in Maine. https://t.co/VgkpboJe4O— Jesse Lehrich (@JesseLehrich) November 8, 2017
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:05 (seven years ago)
unperson give me a fucking break
oh wow 15 dollars wow
― brimstead, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:07 (seven years ago)
A father consoles his son at a watch party for Ed Gillespie, who lost the Virginia governor's race to Ralph Northam https://t.co/H4k2nkcyMr pic.twitter.com/XLQlDnvIwL— POLITICO (@politico) November 8, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:07 (seven years ago)
Which of those is the official Goldman Sachs position? I forget.
Both sound like chicken bones for the masses, sucker.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:13 (seven years ago)
"...darn cheese. *SOB*"xp
― WilliamC, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:13 (seven years ago)
NY State constitutional convention defeated, thank Christ
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:16 (seven years ago)
fox news an hour ago
Meanwhile, on Fox, the Clinton presidency is dealt another blow pic.twitter.com/ULYpuGWb16— Megan Garber (@megangarber) November 8, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:16 (seven years ago)
Greenwald calling for President Clinton's impeachment
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:20 (seven years ago)
In addition to electing Murphy, NJ voters approved $125 million in bonds to build and expand public libraries.
― grawlix (unperson), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:21 (seven years ago)
why is it bad that a normal/shitty dem is responding to demands for $15/hr
― global tetrahedron, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:25 (seven years ago)
Alfred Lord Tomboto
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:25 (seven years ago)
nobody said it was bad! let's go for $20, since every good thing he does will be forced on him.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:26 (seven years ago)
The most encouraging thing I read about the VA election is that exit polls had health care at 60% the most important voter issue. And that's in a race where health care for all purposes was not even really debated. Which means the voters saw through the noise, which further bodes poorly for the GOP in 2018.
Funniest quip I saw was that they should elect a statue to Ed Gillespie so that his loss will not be forgotten.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:29 (seven years ago)
― grawlix (unperson), Tuesday, November 7, 2017 7:21 PM (thirteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― global tetrahedron, Tuesday, November 7, 2017 7:25 PM (ten minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
rip van winkle shit wake up
― brimstead, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:36 (seven years ago)
Flipping 14 seats from red to blue in VA is the biggest Democratic pick-up since 1899.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:36 (seven years ago)
WE HAVE SEIZED AN ADDITIONAL 140 CHARACTERS FROM THE BOURGEOISIE AND WILL IMMEDIATELY PLACE THEM IN THE SERVICE OF THE PROLETARIAT. REPEAT: WE HAVE SEIZED AN ADDITIONAL 140 CHARACTERS FROM THE BOURGEOISIE AND WILL IMMEDIATELY PLACE THEM IN THE SERVICE OF THE PROLETARIAT.— Pioneer Valley DSA🌹 (@PVDemSoc) November 7, 2017
― j., Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:36 (seven years ago)
New NJ gov has super-aggressive energy policy and envitonmental positions, works for me
Xp
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:37 (seven years ago)
Dems in GA potentially on cusp of busting GOP supermajority?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:37 (seven years ago)
Tally (so far) posted:
Dems win NJGov, full control of NJ government.—Dems win VA Gov, huge gains in VA Assembly (shot at majority)—Dems win mayorship in Charlotte, St. Petersburg, Manchester, NYC—Dems pick-up leg seats in NH & GA (x2)—Civil-rights attorney will be Philly DA
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:38 (seven years ago)
this is bad news folks
It's official: @wallacefor119, a Ruby on Rails developer(!!!), has flipped a long-held Republican seat and is going to the Georgia House of Representatives.— Luigi Ray-Montañez (@1uigi) November 8, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:39 (seven years ago)
(!!!)
― brimstead, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:40 (seven years ago)
These numbers are stark. GOP precincts with no HoD dem challenger: no #vagov dem vote increase. GOP precincts *with* an HoD dem challenger: 20% #vagov dem vote increase. What's the opposite of coattails.— Reed Shaw (@reedgshaw) November 8, 2017
the main thing is: run. even if the only candidate you can find is a rails dev.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:43 (seven years ago)
I cannot understand whatever that is you just shared.
― Mad Piratical (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:47 (seven years ago)
Me neither
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:48 (seven years ago)
the first part seems . . . self-evident
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:49 (seven years ago)
I think VA for a few years had no Dem challenger for a couple of GOP held seats, so Dems stayed home. But adding a Dem challenger upped turnout 20%.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:50 (seven years ago)
That is, there were seats Dems did not even consider competitive so they did not even field a candidate, until this year, and just doing so was enough to juice turnout and win seats.
sorry the ruby on rails tweet is a dumb nerd thing
the main point is dems should run everywhere in this climate
alabama senate coming up
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:52 (seven years ago)
That’s what I figured. But what is “HoD”?
― Mad Piratical (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:54 (seven years ago)
House of Delegates.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:55 (seven years ago)
It will be interesting to see how congressional republicans react to these election results. Will they criticize Trump more openly, or attribute the reaction against republicans to their failure to repeal ACA and build a wall against Mexicans, and so consequently double down on their hard right shift? Seems to me they should read this as buyer's remorse from what voters bought in 2016, but then a lot of the Rs in Congress don't seem bright enough to read.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:55 (seven years ago)
yeah interesting to see if this has any effect on tax reform. probably not.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:57 (seven years ago)
Back to what I posted, health care was the number one VA exit poll issue in an election by some margin, and this was a campaign muddied by confederate statues and Latino gangs and crime and law and order and Trump shit. Shows that people want what the GOP does not got, which should be a wake-up call to those dummies about where their priorities should be.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:58 (seven years ago)
Key VA numbers:
Bob Mcdonnel (2009) 1,163,523Ed Gillespie (2017) 1,160,314GOP got the same vote as 2009 when they won in landslide. The Dems have tuned out HARD
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 03:59 (seven years ago)
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, November 7, 2017
hey, Greenwald has appeared more than once on that swollen lackey's show. What loyalty do you owe him?
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:02 (seven years ago)
i don't see shows
are u guys SURE you wanna get rid of Yam? Dems' best hope in decades
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:03 (seven years ago)
stealing this, thanks
― sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:04 (seven years ago)
Dougie's runnin a good campaign but I am a little less bullish on this one. Moore seems to be avoiding putting his foot in his mouth so far. Plus it's fuckin deep red Alabama.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:04 (seven years ago)
Haha yeah i stole it too
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:05 (seven years ago)
i think you mean... ERECT
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:05 (seven years ago)
yes, I edited it :)
― sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:06 (seven years ago)
re AL, yeah they're not going to win it, but they should spend some money there
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:06 (seven years ago)
Curious to learn the final down ballot tally tomorrow. Keep seeing tales of deep red city councils going blue, Mayorships flipping ... Even the person who got that choad Chavetz's seat in Utah is apparently more moderate.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:07 (seven years ago)
Just for the sake of the country, it's the outcome we should all want. Further, it's hard to imagine any scenario where we get rid of Trump prior to the end of his term, where the Republicans don't also suffer a tremendous loss of voter trust and their power is badly undercut.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:07 (seven years ago)
If the republicans keep insisting on jamming through legislation with 25% approval ratings or less I think we have a chance
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:16 (seven years ago)
It looks like the WA state senate will turn blue. Huge for getting shit done here
― alomar lines, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:26 (seven years ago)
Other numbers from the internet:
The race for Utah #3rd was less then 110 votes. The Democratic contender loosing 42% to the Republican winner's 43%. UTAH! And the Republican was a verrry popular mayor, quite moderate.
Democrat Manka Dhingra is leading in early returns in Washington’s 45th Senate district, 55 percent to 45 percent. (Polls there closed at 11 p.m. Eastern.) There’s no reason to believe that result won’t hold as more votes are counted. If every other race goes as expected (and we believe it will), this is a pickup for the Democrats and with it they pickup control of the Washington state Senate. That means they control every legislative body and governorship on the West Coast.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:26 (seven years ago)
Haha
Thoughts and prayers to all the Republican politicians who lost their seats today. We won't do anything to prevent it from happening again.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:28 (seven years ago)
Oh thats good
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:30 (seven years ago)
VA DELEGATES COUNT: 48D, 47R. 5 seats to decide control:#HD27 (Chesterfield): Del. Robinson (R) up by 129 votes.#HD28 (F'burg): Thomas (R) up by 86.#HD40 (Fairfax): Tanner (D) up by 68.#HD68 (Richmond): Adams (D) up by 316.#HD94 (Newport News): Del. Yancey (R) up by 12.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:30 (seven years ago)
those numbers don't seem to be correct.
― new noise, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:42 (seven years ago)
Indeed. Looks like it was 58/27, more or less, which makes more sense.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:44 (seven years ago)
the cited numbers were the difference in salt lake county, not the state.
― new noise, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:46 (seven years ago)
Ah. Thanks for the correction! Still ... good for SLC.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:50 (seven years ago)
https://www.google.com/amp/minnesota.cbslocal.com/2017/11/07/st-paul-mayor-race-results/amp/This is a big deal - in a race with 5 top spots filled with DFL peeps - guy who ran on frank discussion of systematic racism beats more likely electable solid dem guy who promised to add 50 cops.
― jjjusten, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:52 (seven years ago)
and a fuckin banker
i'm pleased with my electoral power tonite
― j., Wednesday, 8 November 2017 04:57 (seven years ago)
Another way to score tonight’s election results: the candidates whom Obama campaigned for won; the candidates whom Trump backed (but didn’t campaign for) lost.— Edward-Isaac Dovere (@IsaacDovere) November 8, 2017
Idg JiC's VA delegate count up there. If the Dems win the two seats they're leading they'll have 50 seats, and if the GOP picks up the three seats they're leading they will... also have 50? Is that right?
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 05:10 (seven years ago)
And then the Lt. Gov breaks any ties.
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 05:22 (seven years ago)
(Wait, not sure if that if that's just in the state senate.)
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 05:23 (seven years ago)
Bluhhhhhggghh Seattle on track to elect the shitty prosecutor slash handpicked successor of the child rapist mayor
― .oO (silby), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 05:24 (seven years ago)
re: Alabama
It's not that Roy Moore has overwhelming support. It's that "reasonable" republicans would prefer to stay home rather than vote for Doug Jones. So it will be small base (AL dems) vs. diminished base (AL gop).
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 05:25 (seven years ago)
hd68 just declared for dem, so they need 1 for 50, or 2 for control
i don't think the lt gov breaks ties though
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 05:29 (seven years ago)
Yeah, I was wrong. He does that in the VA state senate.
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 05:38 (seven years ago)
AMAZING pic.twitter.com/zS67j3zYl7— Aaron Horwitz (@AaronTheH) November 8, 2017
― j., Wednesday, 8 November 2017 05:46 (seven years ago)
JUST IN: Democrats win full control of Washington state government with key state Senate victory https://t.co/NuY327Shq8 pic.twitter.com/I1b9Nt3Fxd— The Hill (@thehill) November 8, 2017
― j., Wednesday, 8 November 2017 05:49 (seven years ago)
the tweet seems to be newer than the linked story, which is yet undeclared as to victor, tho
― j., Wednesday, 8 November 2017 05:52 (seven years ago)
Election results in WA take weeks to certify because of vote by mail, but the “late liberal” phenomenon in the greater Seattle area means that votes counted after Election Day pretty reliably trend towards the more progressive candidates. A Democrat with a lead on Election Day is going to win.
― .oO (silby), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 05:57 (seven years ago)
When asked about Bob Marshall, Danica Roem said “I don't attack my constituents. Bob is my constituent now.” She has more grace and composure than I will ever have. #virginia #DanicaRoem— Nicholas Trevino (@BlyTarbell) November 8, 2017
: O
― j., Wednesday, 8 November 2017 06:44 (seven years ago)
Dems!@RalphNortham can’t even begin victory speech bc pro sanctuary cities activists are heckling him. pic.twitter.com/tNfBxdlNTr— Jonathan Martin (@jmartNYT) November 8, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 08:34 (seven years ago)
Confirmed wins for DSA members: Carter, Pappas, Sipress, Singh Perez, Scott, Prizio, Decker, Ewen-Campen, Gloe, Farmer, and Rader.— process truster (@LarryWebsite) November 8, 2017
And @Billings_DSA member Denise Joy won her race for City Council Ward 3!— Billings DSA (@Billings_DSA) November 8, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 08:51 (seven years ago)
Aw rats, Grant lost his race in Seattle.
http://m.seattlepi.com/local/politics/article/Connely-Durkan-grabs-lead-for-Mayor-Mosqueda-12339465.php
Interesting choice of words here:
The apparent victories by Durkan and Mosqueda mark a win for mainstream progressive Democrats and a big defeat for the city's noisy, political left. The Stranger endorsed both Moon and Grant.
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 09:08 (seven years ago)
I think I read that if there is a tie in the Virginia legislature then some sort of a power-sharing arrangement comes into play. Ironically, in the past a split has apparently worked out really well for both parties, which are forced to cooperate and therefore produce more results.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 12:46 (seven years ago)
A couple of thoughts:
1) Both for the sake of morale and for the sake of practical gain, I am so glad we and Dems on the whole focused so much energy on state and local races. Those matter, and those wins further cut through the all-or-nothing illusion of high profile races. So much focus on the news right now about VA and NJ, which is fine, but I haven't heard or read many things getting to the nitty-gritty gains of the VA state legislature or Washington state, or even Georgia, all of which are pretty impressive and potentially very, very important.
2) I'm glad asshole Trump is not in the thread title. I think that made all the difference yesterday.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 13:24 (seven years ago)
Yay for Democrat Kathy Tran, first Vietnamese-American ever elected to Va. House of Delegates.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 13:50 (seven years ago)
The ilx-factor
― i believe that (s)he is sincere (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 13:50 (seven years ago)
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/07/northam-wins-virginia-election-democrats-infighting-215802
Politico headline on article: The Democratic Circular Firing Squad Dodges a Bullet
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 13:56 (seven years ago)
I don't even know what to say about that article, which starts
"Democrats tried pretty hard to lose the Virginia gubernatorial election. Yet they managed to win anyway"
I mean .. they tried hard to lose? By contesting tons of races that would have been handed to Republicans in previous cycles? By getting everybody on board so that the defeated primary candidate was criss-crossing the state busting his ass to get Northam a win? What does a state Democratic party have to do to convince pundits that maybe it knows what it's doing? Or is it just too easy for political writers to reach for "Democratic political operations are incompetent, if they lose they blew it, if they won it's despite themselves."
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 14:28 (seven years ago)
Yeah, fuck that perspective. Dems turned out in force and voted for Dems, there's not a lot of hand wringing to be wrought from those results.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 14:34 (seven years ago)
There's a reason why Charles Pierce calls Politico Tiger Beat On The Potomac
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 14:35 (seven years ago)
Hmm, when white people become a minority in America, will minorities still be called minorities?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 14:36 (seven years ago)
they will be called "the people on the other side of the gates"
― President Keyes, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:03 (seven years ago)
starting to feel like the main message for Dems from now until 2020 should be targeted exclusively at young people and be something like "hey assholes, you actually have to vote"
― frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:06 (seven years ago)
and yeah that article is garbage - VA leans Dem, and there's an Republican president sitting at like 37% approval right now. if Gillespie had won, *that* would have been significant. of course I don't wanna understate how important yesterday was, especially in terms of whether or not "double down on Trump" is gonna be a viable strategy in 2018. as mentioned a zillion times in these threads these GOP assholes aren't gonna do a single meaningful thing to rebuke the idiot in charge of their party until they actually start losing elections. so, good job everyone
― frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:15 (seven years ago)
xp health care, health care, health care. as per Josh's post upthread:
― sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:15 (seven years ago)
Separately, a Politico story that says it all, and shouldn't surprise you in the least.
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/08/donald-trump-johnstown-pennsylvania-supporters-215800
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:15 (seven years ago)
other thing is that VA was at the center of a literal Nazi rally so I imagine that probably got a few more people off the couch
― frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:17 (seven years ago)
that's a good point and (being from VA) my anecdotal evidence is "definitely"
― sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:18 (seven years ago)
During his major address to the South Korean National Assembly, President Trump invoked his Bedminster golf club. Trump was complimenting South Korea and at one point talked about Korean golfers being some of the best on earth.
And then the President said this: “In fact, and you know what I’m going to say, the Women’s US Open was held this year at Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey, and it just happened to be won by a great Korean golfer.”
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:28 (seven years ago)
destroy all golf clubs imo
― mh, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:29 (seven years ago)
Build social housing on every golf course
― .oO (silby), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:30 (seven years ago)
god, that Johnstown article
“We’ve been trying to reach out to him to say, ‘Hey, remember us? We need help here,’” he told me. “That’s my only frustration. I’d just like to tell Trump, ‘Hello? We’re still here. We’re ready for you.’”
― frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:31 (seven years ago)
imo golf courses should be changed to a mixture of public parks/social housing and natural grassland prairie
put some buffalo in your back yard, it's good
― mh, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:32 (seven years ago)
I mean the level of cognitive dissonance on display is just depressing, you point out how Trump hasn't done jack shit to help nor made good on any of his campaign promises and you just get this
“But I like him,” Frear reiterated. “Because he does what he says.”
― frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:33 (seven years ago)
I'm so tired of stories about die-hard Trump voters. Who gives a shit? You want a minority, there's your minority. The shittiest, stupidest minority.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:34 (seven years ago)
Trump should compromise and get them more coal jobs and more opioids.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:35 (seven years ago)
what sports are going to be left for these guys to watch at the end of this? hockey? lacrosse?
― iatee, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:36 (seven years ago)
still waiting for the longform pieces about the people who did not vote for Trump but I won't hold my breath
― frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:37 (seven years ago)
These idiots are the forgotten people for a reason.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:37 (seven years ago)
"Shame on them,” Del Signore said over his alfredo. “These clowns are out there, making millions of dollars a year, and they’re using some stupid excuse that they want equality—so I’ll kneel against the flag and the national anthem?”“You’re not a fan of equality?” I asked.“For people who deserve it and earn it,” he said. “All my ancestors, Italian, 100-percent Italian, the Irish, Germans, Polish, whatever—they all came over here, settled in places like this, they worked hard and they earned the respect. They earned the success that they got. Some people don’t want to do that. They just want it handed to them.”
“You’re not a fan of equality?” I asked.
“For people who deserve it and earn it,” he said. “All my ancestors, Italian, 100-percent Italian, the Irish, Germans, Polish, whatever—they all came over here, settled in places like this, they worked hard and they earned the respect. They earned the success that they got. Some people don’t want to do that. They just want it handed to them.”
― Conic section rebellion 44 (in orbit), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:39 (seven years ago)
stout genial man who wears gold chains around his neck and rings on both pinkies
“Everybody I talk to,” he said, “realizes it’s not Trump who’s dragging his feet. Trump’s probably the most diligent, hardest-working president we’ve ever had in our lifetimes. It’s not like he sleeps in till noon and goes golfing every weekend, like the last president did.”
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:39 (seven years ago)
It’s not like he golfing every weekend It’s not like he golfing every weekend It’s not like he golfing every weekend It’s not like he golfing every weekend It’s not like he golfing every weekend
wtf he literally does go golfing every weekend!!!!
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:40 (seven years ago)
It's true. His words and his actions are expressions of ignorance and incoherence. Oh, and spite and hate and venality.
― Bernard Crunderdunder (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:40 (seven years ago)
he is, without a doubt, the golfiest president to have ever lived, in a way that shows the true rot behind golf culture
― mh, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:41 (seven years ago)
Oral history of Inside Donald Trump's Election Night War Room:
https://www.gq.com/story/inside-donald-trumps-election-night-war-room
― Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:41 (seven years ago)
reality never was a friend o' theirs xxp
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:42 (seven years ago)
Can't fix stupid
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:43 (seven years ago)
““All my ancestors, Italian, 100-percent Italian, the Irish, Germans, Polish, whatever—they all came over here, settled in places like this, they worked hard and they earned the respect their whiteness.”
― Bernard Crunderdunder (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:43 (seven years ago)
The irish actually did have to earn their whiteness tbh
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:44 (seven years ago)
All my ancestors, Italian, 100-percent Italian, the Irish, Germans, Polish, whatever—they all came over here, settled in places like this, they worked hard and they earned the respect.
And yet somehow I'll bet this guy doesn't love Jews
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:45 (seven years ago)
My favorite Trumpster loss last night was a local one, Tom Coyne, the shitstain mayor of Brook Park, OH (a working-class suburb which includes a Ford engine-assembly plant). He lost to an independent auto-worker's union rep:
Coyne served as mayor for two decades from 1982 to 2001. He declined to comment Tuesday night.He then was reelected in 2013. Most recently, he made headlines by switching from the Democratic to the Republican party and supporting Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.He lost to Michael Gammella, a former city council president and an United Auto Workers union-Ford international representative.Coyne said Tuesday night that he did not want to comment until results had been finalized.Thomas Coyne Jr.: 37.59 percentJan Powers: 9.41 percentTom Colburn: 10.09 percent Michael Gammella: 42.92 percent
He then was reelected in 2013. Most recently, he made headlines by switching from the Democratic to the Republican party and supporting Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election.
He lost to Michael Gammella, a former city council president and an United Auto Workers union-Ford international representative.
Coyne said Tuesday night that he did not want to comment until results had been finalized.
Thomas Coyne Jr.: 37.59 percent
Jan Powers: 9.41 percent
Tom Colburn: 10.09 percent
Michael Gammella: 42.92 percent
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:46 (seven years ago)
he made headlines by switching from the Democratic to the Republican party and supporting Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election
lol waht
― with your tight body and horrific androgynous monster face (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:48 (seven years ago)
Good morning to 69 people who decided NOT to stay home yesterday and defeated the chair of the VA House Republican caucus. pic.twitter.com/0wVor0ij2j— Leigh Walton (@leighwalton) November 8, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:50 (seven years ago)
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:51 (seven years ago)
I'm glad the end of that article spells out in no uncertain terms why these people are so hostile towards the NFL
amused by the comments calling this a "hit piece" when it just allows these people to speak freely. reminds me of the people railing against "biased" media coverage that just quoted Trump verbatim.
― frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:52 (seven years ago)
Sweet
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:52 (seven years ago)
man that is so awesome, so proud of VA right now
― sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:53 (seven years ago)
Oral history of Inside Donald Trump's Election Night War Room:https://www.gq.com/story/inside-donald-trumps-election-night-war-room
this is worth a read if you can stomach it
a choice selection:
Charles Johnson, alt-right activist: I went first to the Hilton around five-ish, six-ish, and then I was like, "Oh man, it's pretty dead, it's pretty boring. Fuck it, let's go to the Proud Boys thing," which was downtown. So we said, "All right."(The Proud Boys—a pro-Trump "Western chauvinist" fraternity founded by VICE media's estranged co-founder, Gavin McInnes—are hosting an election night party at Gaslight lounge in New York's Meatpacking District.)Charles Johnson: I saw Martin Shkreli there, and I was like, "Martin, I think you're going to go to jail. I don't want to be mean to you." He was kind of indignant, like, "No, man." I was like, "I hope you're having a good time, because you're going to prison." I wasn't trying to be a dick about it. And then Gavin came by and I was like, "Hey, he's going to jail," and he was like, "Don't say that!"
(The Proud Boys—a pro-Trump "Western chauvinist" fraternity founded by VICE media's estranged co-founder, Gavin McInnes—are hosting an election night party at Gaslight lounge in New York's Meatpacking District.)
Charles Johnson: I saw Martin Shkreli there, and I was like, "Martin, I think you're going to go to jail. I don't want to be mean to you." He was kind of indignant, like, "No, man." I was like, "I hope you're having a good time, because you're going to prison." I wasn't trying to be a dick about it. And then Gavin came by and I was like, "Hey, he's going to jail," and he was like, "Don't say that!"
― with your tight body and horrific androgynous monster face (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:57 (seven years ago)
never let them tell u the proud boys don't know how to party
― with your tight body and horrific androgynous monster face (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 15:58 (seven years ago)
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/08/upshot/the-other-virginia-elections-and-what-they-mean-for-2018.html?_r=0
The big question in 2018 might prove to be whether Democrats can have it all: Will it be possible to combine a Virginia-like near sweep of Republicans in Clinton districts with a broad Democratic overperformance in white working-class districts?
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 16:00 (seven years ago)
All my ancestors, Italian, 100-percent Italian, the Irish, Germans, Polish, whatever
the ability to "whatever" this is pretty funny imo
you know, whatever they were, italian and polish, same thing whatevs
― mh, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 16:14 (seven years ago)
GASLIGHT LOUNGE jfc you can't make this shit up
― sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 16:15 (seven years ago)
Charles Johnson: I saw Martin Shkreli
in a time when twitter banned virtually no one for being abusive dipshits, both these guys were banned. Chuck way back in 2015
what a party
― mh, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 16:15 (seven years ago)
34 percent of voters said expressing opposition to Trump was a reason for their vote, with almost all of this group favoring Northam, per our in-house pollster Scott Clement. Half as many (17 percent) sought to express support for the president, while 47 percent said Trump was not a factor in their choice.
In Virginia, the network exit poll asked respondents which one of five issues mattered most in deciding their vote for governor: 39 percent said health care, far more than any other issue. And health-care focused voters favored Northam by a giant 77 percent to 23 percent margin in preliminary exit polls. Gillespie won handily among those who named taxes and immigration as their top issue. The candidates split among those who picked gun policy.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 16:20 (seven years ago)
All 14 of the seats that Democrats flipped are held by GOP men. Ten of their replacements will be women.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 16:22 (seven years ago)
amused by the comments calling this a "hit piece" when it just allows these people to speak freely
lol and they even evince awareness that they shouldn't be speaking freely and they know they're talking to a reporter and then they fucking do it anyway, fuck them
― j., Wednesday, 8 November 2017 16:24 (seven years ago)
happy 1-year anniversary everyone
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 16:50 (seven years ago)
ugh that article
― the late great, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 16:50 (seven years ago)
how has it only been a year
― with your tight body and horrific androgynous monster face (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 16:51 (seven years ago)
Pfft.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/08/corey-lewandowski-carter-page-email-244689
Former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski said Tuesday night his "memory has been refreshed" regarding his email exchange with Carter Page in which the former foreign policy adviser requested Lewandowski's permission to travel to Moscow.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 16:52 (seven years ago)
hard to remember all your shitty decisions when you spent so much time grifting and grafting
― mh, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 16:53 (seven years ago)
Carter Page: clarification - although I asked for Lewandowski’s permission, note that I did not ask for his approval. Totally different things.
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 16:55 (seven years ago)
why would you remember the totally normal request from a colleague to travel to russia in the middle of a presidential campaign
― with your tight body and horrific androgynous monster face (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 16:56 (seven years ago)
Carter Page: not even a request! More like an open ended question, really.
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 16:59 (seven years ago)
I plead the fifth, if I told you what I did on Monday evening, it might make me look bad on the internet
― mh, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:02 (seven years ago)
this story about the pound shop trump who ran for nyc mayor and got 1% of the vote is amaaaazing
would anyone like to hear a good Bo Dietl story right now, courtesy of my step uncle— extremely employable (@rachelmillman) November 8, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:10 (seven years ago)
via lag00n
― mh, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:11 (seven years ago)
Republicans seeking to overhaul the federal tax code faced new head winds Wednesday, including a new $74 billion hole in their plan and political fallout from GOP losses in Tuesday's state and local elections.Democrats won gubernatorial races in New Jersey and Virginia on Tuesday and also stood on the cusp of winning control of the Virginia House of Delegates - a setback that many are calling a wake-up call to the GOP.But top Republican tax writers split on Wednesday over exactly what signal voters sent.Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah, said the losses could shape the tax bill going forward."It could," he said in a brief morning interview. "I mean, it could, because the elections went against the Republicans."Asked if he is feeling pressure to tilt the tax plan more toward the middle class, Hatch said, "I think we've been moving that way anyway."But House Speaker Paul D. Ryan, R-Wis., said that he intended to move full steam ahead on a House plan that would cut taxes by $1.5 trillion over 10 years but deliver the bulk of the cuts to corporations and the wealthy."It doesn't change my reading of the current moment," Ryan said of the elections during a morning event hosted by the Washington Examiner. "It just emphasizes my reading of the current moment, which is: We have a promise to keep, and we have to get on with keeping our promise."He added, "I fundamentally believe, when we deliver on comprehensive tax reform and tax relief ... I think that's going to bear fruit politically, but most importantly it's going to help people."The initial version of the House tax bill delivered only 21 percent of its benefits to individuals, including the middle class, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation. Four-fifths of the bill's aggregate tax cut benefited corporations and business owners with family earnings of more than $260,000 a year, as well as wealthy individuals who would no longer be subject to the federal estate tax.Republicans argue that the business tax cuts will drive economic growth, adding jobs and pushing up wages, thus creating benefits for Americans at large. But they have had to battle analyses showing that middle-class taxpayers would reap only a fraction of the bill's direct benefits, and that some of those taxpayers would actually face a tax increase.The Senate is set to release its own version of the bill on Thursday, which is expected to differ significantly from the House bill. It could delay a planned cut in the corporate tax rate, for instance, but also eliminate a popular individual deduction for state and local taxes.Changes made to the House bill since it was released last week have largely benefited corporations at the expense of individuals. While a change on Monday restored a $3.2 billion middle-class provision allowing those enrolled in employer-sponsored dependent-care savings plans to deduct up to $5,000 from their taxes, a revision on Friday rolled back individual tax cuts by nearly $82 billion by indexing individual tax parameters to a different measure of inflation that tends to grow more slowly.Another amendment adopted Monday largely reversed a 20 percent excise tax levied on certain transactions between subsidiaries of multinational corporations. That tax, intended to prevent companies from shifting profits to lower-tax overseas affiliates, had generated strong resistance from powerful business interests.The Joint Committee on Taxation found in an analysis issued late Tuesday that the reversal of the excise tax would cut revenue by $147.5 billion over a decade. A tweak to another corporate tax, the JCT found, would cut another $9.6 billion in revenue.Combined with other changes, that leaves the GOP plan costing $1.574 trillion - $74 billion over a $1.5 trillion limit imposed under budget procedures Republicans adopted to skirt a Democratic filibuster in the Senate.More than half of the overall tax cut, under the JCT's number, now flows to corporations, with another 32 percent benefiting owners of businesses that pass their earnings to the owners to be taxed as individual income. Individuals would get 16 percent of the aggregate tax cut.Members of the House Ways and Means Committee entered their third day Wednesday debating and seeking to amend the tax bill. Only one Republican amendment has been adopted; the committee voted down nine Democratic amendments that sought to highlight the bill's impact on the middle class and on the federal budget deficit.Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr., D-N.J., a member of the tax-writing panel, said Wednesday that Republicans were unwise to continue pushing along the same course after Tuesday's election results."There's a lot of squirming going on and a lot of unanswered questions that are being asked because they can't justify them taking from Peter to pay Paul," Pascrell said. "It's quite obvious that the election is a symptom of what's going on. This is bad bill, which they are stuttering through as they try to justify it, (is) only going to get worse as they try to change it."
Democrats won gubernatorial races in New Jersey and Virginia on Tuesday and also stood on the cusp of winning control of the Virginia House of Delegates - a setback that many are calling a wake-up call to the GOP.
But top Republican tax writers split on Wednesday over exactly what signal voters sent.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah, said the losses could shape the tax bill going forward.
"It could," he said in a brief morning interview. "I mean, it could, because the elections went against the Republicans."
Asked if he is feeling pressure to tilt the tax plan more toward the middle class, Hatch said, "I think we've been moving that way anyway."
But House Speaker Paul D. Ryan, R-Wis., said that he intended to move full steam ahead on a House plan that would cut taxes by $1.5 trillion over 10 years but deliver the bulk of the cuts to corporations and the wealthy.
"It doesn't change my reading of the current moment," Ryan said of the elections during a morning event hosted by the Washington Examiner. "It just emphasizes my reading of the current moment, which is: We have a promise to keep, and we have to get on with keeping our promise."
He added, "I fundamentally believe, when we deliver on comprehensive tax reform and tax relief ... I think that's going to bear fruit politically, but most importantly it's going to help people."
The initial version of the House tax bill delivered only 21 percent of its benefits to individuals, including the middle class, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation. Four-fifths of the bill's aggregate tax cut benefited corporations and business owners with family earnings of more than $260,000 a year, as well as wealthy individuals who would no longer be subject to the federal estate tax.
Republicans argue that the business tax cuts will drive economic growth, adding jobs and pushing up wages, thus creating benefits for Americans at large. But they have had to battle analyses showing that middle-class taxpayers would reap only a fraction of the bill's direct benefits, and that some of those taxpayers would actually face a tax increase.
The Senate is set to release its own version of the bill on Thursday, which is expected to differ significantly from the House bill. It could delay a planned cut in the corporate tax rate, for instance, but also eliminate a popular individual deduction for state and local taxes.
Changes made to the House bill since it was released last week have largely benefited corporations at the expense of individuals. While a change on Monday restored a $3.2 billion middle-class provision allowing those enrolled in employer-sponsored dependent-care savings plans to deduct up to $5,000 from their taxes, a revision on Friday rolled back individual tax cuts by nearly $82 billion by indexing individual tax parameters to a different measure of inflation that tends to grow more slowly.
Another amendment adopted Monday largely reversed a 20 percent excise tax levied on certain transactions between subsidiaries of multinational corporations. That tax, intended to prevent companies from shifting profits to lower-tax overseas affiliates, had generated strong resistance from powerful business interests.
The Joint Committee on Taxation found in an analysis issued late Tuesday that the reversal of the excise tax would cut revenue by $147.5 billion over a decade. A tweak to another corporate tax, the JCT found, would cut another $9.6 billion in revenue.
Combined with other changes, that leaves the GOP plan costing $1.574 trillion - $74 billion over a $1.5 trillion limit imposed under budget procedures Republicans adopted to skirt a Democratic filibuster in the Senate.
More than half of the overall tax cut, under the JCT's number, now flows to corporations, with another 32 percent benefiting owners of businesses that pass their earnings to the owners to be taxed as individual income. Individuals would get 16 percent of the aggregate tax cut.
Members of the House Ways and Means Committee entered their third day Wednesday debating and seeking to amend the tax bill. Only one Republican amendment has been adopted; the committee voted down nine Democratic amendments that sought to highlight the bill's impact on the middle class and on the federal budget deficit.
Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr., D-N.J., a member of the tax-writing panel, said Wednesday that Republicans were unwise to continue pushing along the same course after Tuesday's election results.
"There's a lot of squirming going on and a lot of unanswered questions that are being asked because they can't justify them taking from Peter to pay Paul," Pascrell said. "It's quite obvious that the election is a symptom of what's going on. This is bad bill, which they are stuttering through as they try to justify it, (is) only going to get worse as they try to change it."
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:12 (seven years ago)
imo republicans will respond to this in the same way the dems did to scott brown before they passed the ACA. "oh shit we're out in a year, let's just do it and be legends".
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:15 (seven years ago)
well, that's what they'll try to do. they'll have a much squirmier group of votes to corral than they did yesterday though so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:18 (seven years ago)
OMG, I'd forgotten that the dirtbag from the Arby's commercials was running for NYC mayor. I figured he was a shoo-in when I first heard because, well, that's the world now. But it seems the world is still turning!
― Bernard Crunderdunder (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:19 (seven years ago)
― mh, Wednesday, November 8, 2017 4:14 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
They're the same in one important way: whiteness. So it is kind of a whatever.
― Conic section rebellion 44 (in orbit), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:19 (seven years ago)
top Republican tax writers split on Wednesday over exactly what signal voters sent.
That was an easy call.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:21 (seven years ago)
in the Jon Stewart era, the Daily Show made frequent use of Bo Dietl's empty noggin
http://www.cc.com/video-clips/7kqxdg/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-he-s-come-ungunned
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:22 (seven years ago)
xxp my great-grandmother would have differed on that one
― mh, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:25 (seven years ago)
Here I got this book for you
https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51KWGyb2%2BwL.jpg
― Conic section rebellion 44 (in orbit), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:26 (seven years ago)
The apparent victories by Durkan and Mosqueda mark a win for mainstream progressive Democrats and a big defeat for the city's noisy, political left. The Stranger endorsed both Moon and Grant.The Stranger's editor-in-chief and publisher both endorsed Mosqueda btw.
― shackling the masses with plastic-wrapped snack picks (sic), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:29 (seven years ago)
yeah, there were no "white" micks, bohunks and wops in 1910
(mick here)
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:30 (seven years ago)
"We have a promise to keep, and we have to get on with keeping our promise."
This really is the extent of their thinking on this, isn't it?
― the young, low level volunteer named (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:31 (seven years ago)
But don't you see, if 'certain people' would just work harder and stop sponging off of everyone, they too could assimilate just like the Italians and the Irish and the Poles. I mean, I assume all that hard work will somehow magically lighten the skin tone that has perpetually been the barrier of entry into the White People Club, right?
I don't know how people still believe this shit. I mean I do (racism, mythology of white supremacy, etc.) but I don't.
― Bernard Crunderdunder (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:35 (seven years ago)
and miles to go before I derpand miles to go before I derp
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:36 (seven years ago)
paul ryan is such a scumbag
― maura, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:36 (seven years ago)
also yikes @ that johnstown piece kicker
― maura, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:37 (seven years ago)
More Cuba restrictions.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:45 (seven years ago)
wasserman back in september
Democrats aren't likely to pick up the chamber: they currently hold just 34 seats and would need to gain 17 to win control. Hillary Clinton did carry 17 seats held by Republicans last fall, but many of those are located in transient outer suburbs where Democratic-leaning minorities and young voters tend not to vote in off years
and then
Whoa. Let's not lose sight of the youth vote here. Dem margins in VA among 18-29 year olds:McAuliffe +5Clinton +18Northam ... +39 pic.twitter.com/CvnIQsaadh— Will Jordan (@williamjordann) November 8, 2017
Every Democratic strategist should tattoo this table on their chest. Democrats need youth turnout to win. https://t.co/tJ6NtseEiP pic.twitter.com/96Lvm8yrDx— sean. 🦃 (@SeanMcElwee) November 8, 2017
dems just need to nominate someone in 2020 whose name scans with seven nation army
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 17:52 (seven years ago)
^ gets it
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:06 (seven years ago)
eeeeeelizabeth warrrrr-rreen has a nice ring to it but I'm goping we can do better
― Simon H., Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:07 (seven years ago)
lol *hoping
that Bo Dietl story is amazing. we've already passed the point where The Onion is indistinguishable from real life but now it's looking like that's extending to Clickhole as well
― frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:08 (seven years ago)
remember Bo Dietl played *himself* in the Wolf of Wall Street as a loyal minion of Jordan Belfort.
― omar little, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:10 (seven years ago)
AMAZING pic.twitter.com/zS67j3zYl7— A-A-ron (@AaronTheH) November 8, 2017
― ian, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:12 (seven years ago)
Bo Dietl should've campaigned harder on being the only candidate to appear in Bad Lieutenant (1992).— BANDZ STACKHAGE (@NickPinkerton) November 8, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:14 (seven years ago)
Congratulations to all of the ”DEPLORABLES” and the millions of people who gave us a MASSIVE (304-227) Electoral College landslide victory! pic.twitter.com/7ifv5gT7Ur
pretty positive Stephen Miller is legally not allowed to ever be that close to a woman.
― evol j, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:26 (seven years ago)
i've never seen so many bad thumbs-ups in one place, it's like watching moe szyslak try to smile.
― omar little, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:27 (seven years ago)
in the Jon Stewart era, the Daily Show made frequent use of Bo Dietl's empty nogginhttp://www.cc.com/video-clips/7kqxdg/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-he-s-come-ungunned
my only exposure to bo was his willingness to go on the daily show and repeatedly debase himself
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:28 (seven years ago)
I wonder if Miller is losing his mind about not being able to smoke on AF1.. I guess he'll fucking love china.
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:29 (seven years ago)
Dietl was a good spokesman for Arby's because he's the only thing that's more gross than Arby's, so those beef n cheddars looked pretty good by comparison
― evol j, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:30 (seven years ago)
Stephen Miller and Hope Hicks, jesus that's a terrifying pair.
― omar little, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:32 (seven years ago)
Congratulations to our "president" and the impending MASSIVE head trauma he'll suffer when he finally falls face-first onto that running table saw like I've been praying he would for the past year!
― Bernard Crunderdunder (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:32 (seven years ago)
Why does Stephen Miller look like he's 54?
― Bernard Crunderdunder (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:33 (seven years ago)
Wow, he's really going with "Yeah? Well, a year ago, we won, so fuck you!" Pathetic.
― grawlix (unperson), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:40 (seven years ago)
http://victory-bible-studies.com/images/no-shame-only-power_004.png
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:43 (seven years ago)
love that he is forced to qualify it as an electoral college victory, tho.
― ian, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:43 (seven years ago)
(Plenty of hard-luck immigrant stories out there, but I am not aware of Italians being bought and sold in the public square. Just sayin.)
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:47 (seven years ago)
http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/sesostris-the-great-the-egyptian-hercules/the-forgotten-white-slaves-part-ii-nehesy/
― sleeve, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:50 (seven years ago)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indentured_servitude_in_the_Americas
(still not the same, but worth noting)
we were talking about "whiteness", not who was or was not a literal slave (these are related - duh - but not the same thing)
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:53 (seven years ago)
― omar little, Wednesday, November 8, 2017 12:27 PM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I wonder if that one was the seventh take or the 12th take.
― pplains, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:55 (seven years ago)
― Bernard Crunderdunder (Old Lunch), Wednesday, November 8, 2017
smoking in Russian planes
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:56 (seven years ago)
I like how the cover of that book looks like a guy preparing to be consumed by the fire from a nuclear explosion.
xposts
― Evan, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:56 (seven years ago)
trump is celebrating his electoral college victory today? wtf is that?
― akm, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:59 (seven years ago)
"whiteness" has always been some nasty evil divide-and-conquer shit, and it works like a fucking charm.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 18:59 (seven years ago)
wtf is that?
greatest hits album
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:00 (seven years ago)
maybe Trump was in a furious rage over last night's results and was about to order a nukin' and cooler heads distracted him with "hey happy anniversary!" and they stuck a camera in his face and he forgot about WW3.
― omar little, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:04 (seven years ago)
https://www.thenation.com/article/our-revolution-candidates-won-big-last-night/
To go with those youth turnout tables posted upthread.
― Frederik B, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:05 (seven years ago)
Trump seems very not mad right now
― frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:15 (seven years ago)
'whiteness' is a major topic of discussion in my house w/r/t middle easterners and jewish people. my wife is armenian, and we have a lot of persian friends as well. there are people in those communities who claim whiteness. likewise, many jewish people claim whiteness. the thing about whiteness is it's something that in conferred upon; and can be taken away.
― akm, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:28 (seven years ago)
that IS conferred upon. I'm a lousy typist these days
― akm, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:29 (seven years ago)
The photo of the Trump head cake in the Esquire election-night '16 piece is quite nightmarish.
Good exit line by Gary Johnson tho.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:31 (seven years ago)
I could barely make it through that piece, it felt like PTSD coming on
my most vivid memory immediately after the election was going to the Mexican store to pick a few things up and feeling the clientele just staring daggers through me in a way I'd never experienced before. I almost wanted to say, "no, no, I'm one of the good ones!"
― frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:38 (seven years ago)
For a little more buzzkill, I'm not sure I've ever even heard of this "Article V convention of the states to propose amendments to the federal Constitution" shit:
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a13451178/wisconsin-constitutional-convention-vote/
It would hasten the End, though.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:40 (seven years ago)
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/images/ic/960x540/p03vxshb.jpg
― Evan, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:42 (seven years ago)
We need to poll America's worst governors:
In a statement Wednesday morning, LePage said he would not allow expansion to go into effect until the program “has been fully funded by the Legislature at the levels DHHS has calculated.”
But Mainers for Health Care, the organization behind the campaign to expand Medicaid, said despite LePage’s bluster, he can’t stop the expansion train without violating state law.
“Under the state constitution, 45 days after the legislature reconvenes, Medicaid expansion will become the law of the state,” the group’s spokesman David Farmer told TPM. “According to the statute, the Department of Health and Human Services has 90 days after that to submit an implementation plan to the federal government, and the implementation itself will take place in mid-August of 2018.”
“If the governor isn’t willing to follow the law,” he added, “we will take it to the courts if necessary.”
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/lepage-threatens-to-block-medicaid-expansion-after-decisive-statewide-vote
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:45 (seven years ago)
Evidently Putin was off his game yesterday.— Doug Henwood (@DougHenwood) November 8, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:50 (seven years ago)
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, November 8, 2017
Predictably, the Trump quote from a speech last June: "“our policy will seek a much better deal for the Cuban people and for the United States of America."
This man and his fucking deals. We had a deal, bozo. You just broke it.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:50 (seven years ago)
We...we don’t have that many players.— Mariners (@Mariners) November 8, 2017
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 19:52 (seven years ago)
In response to:
BREAKING: 80,000 Mariners will get Medicaid coverage.The people overturned LePage's veto.— Andy Slavitt (@ASlavitt) November 8, 2017
― by the light of the burning Citroën, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 20:09 (seven years ago)
I LOLed, Evan
― erry red flag (f. hazel), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 20:10 (seven years ago)
https://www.ft.com/content/149b22dc-c494-11e7-a1d2-6786f39ef675
AT&T has been told by the US Department of Justice that it needs to sell CNN, Time Warner’s cable news channel, to get its $84.5bn acquisition of the media company approved, according to three people with direct knowledge of the negotiations.The sale of CNN, which President Donald Trump has fiercely criticised as a broadcaster of “fake news”, is just one of the demands being made by the US antitrust authority in order to sign off on the deal, those involved in the talks said. But it could prove a stumbling block.AT&T is opposed to selling the TV network and is preparing to take the Trump administration to court, arguing the deal with Time Warner does not pose any competition violations.“It’s all about CNN,” said one person with direct knowledge of the talks between the company and the DOJ, adding that the regulator made it clear to AT&T that if it sold CNN the deal would go through.
AT&T has been told by the US Department of Justice that it needs to sell CNN, Time Warner’s cable news channel, to get its $84.5bn acquisition of the media company approved, according to three people with direct knowledge of the negotiations.
The sale of CNN, which President Donald Trump has fiercely criticised as a broadcaster of “fake news”, is just one of the demands being made by the US antitrust authority in order to sign off on the deal, those involved in the talks said. But it could prove a stumbling block.
AT&T is opposed to selling the TV network and is preparing to take the Trump administration to court, arguing the deal with Time Warner does not pose any competition violations.
“It’s all about CNN,” said one person with direct knowledge of the talks between the company and the DOJ, adding that the regulator made it clear to AT&T that if it sold CNN the deal would go through.
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 20:12 (seven years ago)
thoughts and prayers going out to morbz on this day
― Universal LULU Nation (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 20:23 (seven years ago)
btw I had to google "Bo Dietl" cuz I was like who is this dipshit then I was like the fuckin paisano dude from the ARBY'S commercials??? what a country
― Universal LULU Nation (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 20:24 (seven years ago)
have no idea what Citroen and uppmiss are on about... anyhoo
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 20:33 (seven years ago)
i've never seen any Bo Arby's ads, one of the blessings of becoming too poor for TV.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 20:34 (seven years ago)
I love that even the electoral college result that Trump has to reach for as a "landslide" is actually the 13th closest EC result of the 58 elections held so far. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_presidential_elections_by_Electoral_College_margin
― attention vampire (MatthewK), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 20:59 (seven years ago)
GOP Sen. Orrin Hatch says election losses could complicate tax reformHatch and other Republican leaders seeking to overhaul the tax code face head winds from a new $74 billion hole in their plan and political fallout from state and local election losses on Nov. 7.
And this was before the just released CBO score that says the tax plan blows a $1.7 trillion hole in the deficit.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 21:02 (seven years ago)
deficits don't matter anymore !
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 21:08 (seven years ago)
they do when you're trying to pass bills through reconciliation
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 21:09 (seven years ago)
lol at the washington post right now
"Fresh evidence that the ground is shifting beneath the GOPThe Republican message of low taxes and common-sense governance wasn’t enough. Will that hold true in 2018?"
is ... that the republican message?
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 8 November 2017 21:14 (seven years ago)
also "racism"
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 21:23 (seven years ago)
"Is the tape recorder on? Okay, now tell him what the 'NFL' stands for..."
― frogbs, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 21:29 (seven years ago)
This is 100% Scavino tweet, not Trump himself: Trump never uses the final outcome, 304 EVs, instead of the 306 EVs he earned in the voting. pic.twitter.com/xSHCdPHiFo— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) November 8, 2017
twitterology
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 8 November 2017 21:51 (seven years ago)
Worthwhile thread from Scott Benson of “Night in the Woods”
oh no it's a year after all the Trump Country stories and now we're gonna get all the One Year Later In Trump Country stories— Dismember November (@bombsfall) November 8, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Thursday, 9 November 2017 00:36 (seven years ago)
Issa now a "no" on House tax bill lol i wonder why
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 00:44 (seven years ago)
Issa no
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 9 November 2017 00:45 (seven years ago)
Heard on the radio some pundit opine that if the tax bill passes as is, the GOP would be virtually decimated in any state with high property taxes. NY, NJ, CA ...
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 00:52 (seven years ago)
it specifically targets rich dems in solid blue states. its an attack on the democratic donor base.
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 9 November 2017 00:53 (seven years ago)
Yup
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 00:56 (seven years ago)
It hurts anyone with high property taxes, no matter where they live, GOP and Dem alike. There are GOP reps all over the place, even in CA. Looks like there are 14 GOP reps in CA, including Issa. They'd all be put at risk. In theory.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 00:56 (seven years ago)
5 GOP reps in NJ, 8 in NY ...
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 00:57 (seven years ago)
yup. getting rid of the state deduction is a "let's just do it and be legends" move wrt the 2018 congressional elections
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 9 November 2017 01:00 (seven years ago)
xpnot only anyone with high property taxes, but anyone with high state and local taxes, which includes voters in a lot of states
― Dan S, Thursday, 9 November 2017 01:04 (seven years ago)
A few Republicans who seem to be in more danger, imo, after last night:Ed Royce, Erik Paulson, Peter Roskam, Mimi Walters (all either lean/likely gop, on Cook). Republicans did not hold on to the VA districts that voted like theirs did in 12/16.— Nate Cohn (@Nate_Cohn) November 8, 2017
(2 CA, 1 MN, 1 IL)
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 9 November 2017 01:05 (seven years ago)
I don't think every single CA rep is going out in 2018 but there's no reason to think the Rohrbachers and Issas in OC and the burbs in San Diego dont get slaughtered.
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 9 November 2017 01:09 (seven years ago)
lol, i just heard Schumer moaning about the GOP tax scheme attacking "the upper-middle class" in "the suburbs." Truly a champion of the soccer mom and marketing dad.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 9 November 2017 01:14 (seven years ago)
c'mon. sure, it's a regressive deduction, but it's not like they're going to take the money and redistribute it to the bottom 20%. the plan raises taxes on people in NYS in order to benefit corporations and fucken wyoming. do you think schumer should support it?
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 9 November 2017 01:20 (seven years ago)
My fave detail from my hometown paper (in Chester County, SE PA):
In one West Chester precinct, the GOP candidates did not reach even 10 votes, while their Democratic opponents neared triple figures.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 03:05 (seven years ago)
"neared"! precinct level is pretty small potatoes
― A is for (Aimless), Thursday, 9 November 2017 03:26 (seven years ago)
Erik Paulson is a shitbag and in a ton of trouble
― Universal LULU Nation (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 9 November 2017 07:48 (seven years ago)
possibly related conditions
― j., Thursday, 9 November 2017 07:57 (seven years ago)
Since I keep hearing about Trump's buddy testifying... when the fuck did "bodyman" become a job title?
― The Fortnightly Intruder (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Thursday, 9 November 2017 09:50 (seven years ago)
Did Trump make it up and the media decided to run with it because they love to use new words and phrases
― The Fortnightly Intruder (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Thursday, 9 November 2017 09:51 (seven years ago)
https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--mFnQEMFM--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/1238167705374019941.jpg
― mark s, Thursday, 9 November 2017 09:55 (seven years ago)
Is that Seinfeld
― The Fortnightly Intruder (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Thursday, 9 November 2017 10:43 (seven years ago)
http://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/jeevesandwooster.jpg
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 9 November 2017 10:53 (seven years ago)
It's been around for a while. Obama's body man was Reggie Love. It just means the person who knows where your phone charger is, picks up your dry cleaning, knows how you like your sandwiches, always has an umbrella. As opposed to aides/assistants whose support is more clerical or policy-related or whatever.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 9 November 2017 11:53 (seven years ago)
I mean, it's a valet.
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 9 November 2017 12:02 (seven years ago)
http://armondwhitebook.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/wj-pr16-jb-holds-up-mirror-to-md-on-stage.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 12:18 (seven years ago)
I guess Trump left his balls on the plane...again.
President Donald Trump said in Beijing on Thursday that he doesn’t fault China for a “very unfair and one-sided” trade relationship with the United States — instead laying the blame with past U.S. administrations.“Right now, unfortunately, it is a very unfair and one-sided one,” Trump said at an event with business leaders in Beijing. But the president added, “I don’t blame China. After all, who can blame a country for taking advantage of another country for the benefit of its citizens?”
“Right now, unfortunately, it is a very unfair and one-sided one,” Trump said at an event with business leaders in Beijing. But the president added, “I don’t blame China. After all, who can blame a country for taking advantage of another country for the benefit of its citizens?”
― grawlix (unperson), Thursday, 9 November 2017 12:31 (seven years ago)
You know what he should do? He should negotiate a better deal, the best deal. I mean, he's so good at it. And he promised!
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 12:33 (seven years ago)
It kind of blows my mind, this line that if the GOP passes some tax law then somehow everyone will just dismiss everything from Trump on down and say, yeah, what a bunch of useless, embarrassing fuckups with disgusting, regressive views, but at least they jammed through some sort of desperate, ill-conceived tax reform! Sign me up!
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 12:42 (seven years ago)
Nothing new here, but the hubris of data miners who once again failed to remotely predict the GOP getting trounced on all levels in VA making more predictions. It's a blue wave! Everything is different! Or, "Don't dismiss Trump without Trump!" Whatever. Hats off to the people on the ground who gave a shit and actually tried and worked hard rather than arrogantly coasting on shady numbers.
Also back suggestions that papers dump these "catching up with Trump voters" shithole pieces and replace them with "catching up with people who didn't vote."
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 12:48 (seven years ago)
Apparently Paul story getting muddier and more mysterious:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/06/the-attack-on-sen-rand-paul-just-keeps-getting-stranger-and-stranger/
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 14:15 (seven years ago)
real talk tho: why wasn't rand paul armed
― drinkmaster sealcup at yr service (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 9 November 2017 14:17 (seven years ago)
But Paul appeared to dispute that notion with a pair of posts to Twitter on Wednesday, linking to a Breitbart News story headlined “Rand Paul’s neighbors say reports blaming savage assault on ‘landscaping dispute’ are fake news” and one from The Washington Examiner headlined “Rand Paul's neighbors rip media 'landscaping dispute' reports.”In its report, The Washington Examiner said Boucher’s social media accounts were peppered with posts critical of President Donald Trump and of Republicans, although it stopped short of suggesting that the attack was politically motivated.
In its report, The Washington Examiner said Boucher’s social media accounts were peppered with posts critical of President Donald Trump and of Republicans, although it stopped short of suggesting that the attack was politically motivated.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 14:18 (seven years ago)
xpost He was armed with a lawnmower.
dead_alive.gif
― Simon H., Thursday, 9 November 2017 14:19 (seven years ago)
if you're mowing your lawn without even the basic protection of a snub-nosed .38 tucked into one of the socks you're wearing with your crocs then you deserve to be throughly and soundly beaten imo
― drinkmaster sealcup at yr service (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 9 November 2017 14:20 (seven years ago)
otm
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 9 November 2017 14:22 (seven years ago)
John Kelly...
On Monday, as the Department of Homeland Security prepared to extend the residency permits of tens of thousands of Honduran immigrants living in the United States, White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly called Acting Secretary Elaine Duke to pressure her to expel them, according to current and former administration officials.
Duke refused to reverse her decision and was angered by what she felt was a politically driven intrusion by Kelly and Tom Bossert, the White House homeland security adviser, who also called her about the matter, according to officials with knowledge of Monday’s events, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/white-house-chief-of-staff-tried-to-pressure-acting-dhs-secretary-to-expel-thousands-of-hondurans-officials-say/2017/11/09/914d3700-c54a-11e7-a441-3a768c8586f1_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_hp-breaking-news%3Apage%2Fbreaking-news-bar&tid=a_breakingnews&utm_term=.d3c2c4b0bd17
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 9 November 2017 15:44 (seven years ago)
I think a political scenario in which Dems gain a House majority by wiping out GOP reps in California, New York, and New Jersey is actually kind of a terrible political equilibrium for the country, though much better than a scenario where GOP has control. The executive branch and the party apparatus will have no political reason at all not to brutalize Californians and New Yorkers.
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 9 November 2017 15:56 (seven years ago)
I'm still pissed that my state went from two establishment senators, one from each party, to two republicans where the reasonable one is Chuck Grassley
― mh, Thursday, 9 November 2017 16:01 (seven years ago)
It’s been an honor to serve #VA06 - thank you for your support and trust. It’s time to step aside. I’ve decided I will not seek re-election.— Bob Goodlatte (@BobGoodlatte6) November 9, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 9 November 2017 16:04 (seven years ago)
(chairman of the house judiciary)
spacebo, comrade
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 9 November 2017 16:08 (seven years ago)
When even Republican Peter King gets some of what's going on (but he'll probably support final version anyway):
Representative Peter T. King of New York said on Wednesday that the results should provide a wake-up call to lawmakers about the risk of losing middle-class voters who were drawn to Mr. Trump.
“I’m convinced we’re going to lose them with this tax bill,” Mr. King said. “The picture they see is an indifference to the middle class, but taking care of special interests. And that’s not why they voted for Donald Trump.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/08/us/politics/senate-republicans-will-diverge-from-house-in-sweeping-tax-rewrite.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 9 November 2017 16:15 (seven years ago)
But the president added, “I don’t blame China. After all, who can blame a country for taking advantage of another country for the benefit of its citizens?”
it's rare when he arranges words in an order that make sense, at least to this degree. were those prepared remarks?
but this is actually kind of an interesting belief, albeit a common one, that probably falls under the "he says what i'm thinking!" category of trump's appeal to some people. it's easy to imagine the poll question "is it acceptable for any country to take advantage of another country for the benefit of its citizens?" leading to ideologically split results, even though those who would think it's not acceptable (like me) would have to acknowledge that it happens all the time. but it seems odd to openly embrace taking advantage of other countries as a goal? maybe not. i'm tired.
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 9 November 2017 16:17 (seven years ago)
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/08/health/medical-deduction-tax-bill.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/08/your-money/the-private-school-tax-break-in-the-middle-class-tax-bill.html
Remarkable to witness, in 24-hour frames, how GOP confidence in tax-reform has gone from high, to very high, to relatively high, to "the product out of conference committee will probably just be a corporate cut"— Tim Alberta (@TimAlberta) November 9, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 9 November 2017 16:23 (seven years ago)
xpost I think that's just Trump's version of game recognize game.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 16:24 (seven years ago)
That seems like a good strategy. "We can't do much to help the American people, but hey, at least we gave corporations a hand up!"
Still not clear why more Dems are not hammering the inconsistency that unemployment is down and corporate profits are way up, so why do they even need tax cuts? They don't need more money and they're maxed out on job openings.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 16:26 (seven years ago)
Attorney General Sessions welcomes U.S. Attorneys to the Justice Department pic.twitter.com/QS2ys8Pyrm— Justice Department (@TheJusticeDept) November 8, 2017
Good choice of photos, guys
― Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 9 November 2017 16:27 (seven years ago)
whoa, following up on qualmsley's post on Kelly and the acting head of DHS:
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/kelly-demands-acting-dhs-secy-expel-hondurans-more-quickly
This is a wild story. Acting Secretary of Homeland Security Elaine Duke is reportedly going to resign after Chief of Staff John Kelly (her former boss as DHS Secretary) called her from Asia to complain that she wasn’t expelling Honduran immigrants quickly enough.This comes from a report in The Washington Post. The details are important. There are a substantial number of immigrants in the US from a handful of Caribbean basin nations where there were either natural disasters or human rights crises which led to the decision to allow immigrants from those countries to stay in the US under Temporary Protected Status. The Trump administration’s policy goal is to change those country designations and expel those people.Elaine Duke is basically in the process of doing just that. She’s already done it with Nicaraguans. She’s just not going fast enough apparently. She decided more time and fact-finding were necessary to make a decision. That got Kelly and Bossert on her case for ‘kicking the can down the road’ and lacking ‘decisiveness’. Kelly was apparently also upset that Duke’s decision might adversely impact confirmation hearings for Kirstjen M. Nielsen, his chosen successor at DHS. The upshot though is that Kelly is angry with Duke because she’s not expelling people quickly enough. The Post’s sources says Duke told Kelly she’s going to resign, though the DHS spokesperson said that’s not true.
This comes from a report in The Washington Post. The details are important. There are a substantial number of immigrants in the US from a handful of Caribbean basin nations where there were either natural disasters or human rights crises which led to the decision to allow immigrants from those countries to stay in the US under Temporary Protected Status. The Trump administration’s policy goal is to change those country designations and expel those people.
Elaine Duke is basically in the process of doing just that. She’s already done it with Nicaraguans. She’s just not going fast enough apparently. She decided more time and fact-finding were necessary to make a decision. That got Kelly and Bossert on her case for ‘kicking the can down the road’ and lacking ‘decisiveness’. Kelly was apparently also upset that Duke’s decision might adversely impact confirmation hearings for Kirstjen M. Nielsen, his chosen successor at DHS. The upshot though is that Kelly is angry with Duke because she’s not expelling people quickly enough. The Post’s sources says Duke told Kelly she’s going to resign, though the DHS spokesperson said that’s not true.
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 9 November 2017 16:27 (seven years ago)
sorry, curmudgeon's post, not qualmsley's
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 9 November 2017 16:28 (seven years ago)
Tbf - and I hate to say this - but he's sort of got a point about kicking the can down the road, as heartless as it scans. As I heard it, the Nicaraguans were here as refugees from a hurricane decades ago, Hurricane Mitch in 1998, and even their president didn't lobby to extend their stay in the USA. I think they were given 14 more months? I assume the Hondurans were here for the same reason, not because of political violence or persecution but a long since passed natural disaster. Right?
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 16:33 (seven years ago)
(Obviously at this point I think those people should stay, just saying, reassessing their Temporary Protect Status had already been kicked 20 years down the road. Their status should and could be addressed the same time as the DACA people.)
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 16:36 (seven years ago)
hmmm
http://www.businessinsider.com/richard-painter-justice-department-time-warner-cnn-trump-impeach-2017-11
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 16:54 (seven years ago)
I am all for impeachment and impeachable offenses, but that guy from day one has called virtually everything he has done an impeachable offense. Not saying it isn't, just saying Painter has been pretty consistent. TPM I know I was really curious about the CNN stuff too, pretty suspicious.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 17:01 (seven years ago)
yeah, anyone living here under Temporary Protect Status has known for a long time that this day would be coming. especially once Trump was elected. but as crazy as it sounds to have not come up with a plan after 20 years, i can see why the acting DHS secretary could be justified in asking for more time to assess the Honduran immigrants' situation.
the Post notes that "previous administrations have repeatedly renewed the residency permits every 18 months", which suggests that coming up with a plan to deport 50,000+ people in a humane way is difficult. add to that the chaos in the federal government right now in terms of empty appointments, acting directors at every level of the organization, from the very top all the way to the low-level supervisors.
in the end, she asked for a 6 month extension to figure things out. obviously from the outside it's impossible to know if that extension was truly warranted, but i do think it's actually very courageous (in a very depressing, bureaucratic way) to argue for more time in the face of a supervisor demanding that you immediately produce results. the easy way out is just to do what they say, implement the flawed plan, and then blame the superior later on for rushing things. delaying means taking the blame (and in this case maybe resigning?) but getting better results for 50,000+ people.
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 9 November 2017 17:03 (seven years ago)
Yeah, but if I read it right, even the Nicaraguans got another 14 months, and they (or their government) weren't asking for an extension. So immediate is not necessarily immediate. Another 6 months could mean another 6 months before deciding it should be another 20 years, so I see why the dicks in charge would be annoyed. I'm all for opposing everything in the Trump administration, but this is a rare instance where I understand the conundrum.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 17:11 (seven years ago)
caek (way xxp), I'm just struck that I seldom hear Schumer on the soapbox when the GOP victimizes poor people.
I read Yam's "I don't blame China" as "I blame Obama."
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 9 November 2017 17:44 (seven years ago)
this isn't good, Dems have to do a better job hammering home how bad this is:
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/09/poll-support-for-gop-tax-plan-ticks-down-but-remains-positive-244715
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 17:47 (seven years ago)
?hpid=hp_no-name_hp-breaking-news%3Apage%2Fbreaking-news-bar&tid=a_breakingnews&utm_term=.d3c2c4b0bd17?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news&_r=0
― shackling the masses with plastic-wrapped snack picks (sic), Thursday, 9 November 2017 17:50 (seven years ago)
holy shit at sieg heil session pic
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Thursday, 9 November 2017 17:51 (seven years ago)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/woman-says-roy-moore-initiated-sexual-encounter-when-she-was-14-he-was-32/2017/11/09/1f495878-c293-11e7-afe9-4f60b5a6c4a0_story.html?tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.312accd3cb84
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Thursday, 9 November 2017 17:58 (seven years ago)
i can already see the right-wing reaction to that story but considering how close that election is...
― omar little, Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:01 (seven years ago)
re bad behavior: fakin' you out
https://observer.com/2017/11/spy-circles-suspect-kremlin-is-behind-dozens-of-fake-trump-sex-tapes/
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:02 (seven years ago)
Dozens of fake Trump sex tapes?
I sense a poll thread in our future.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:09 (seven years ago)
more interesting is the confident assertions that there are tapes that are almost assuredly *not* fake
but even having something on tape can i think be dismissed by red hatters, i mean they can point to something like the very well done fake version of that Billy Bush tape, which ends w/trump getting tackled.
― omar little, Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:14 (seven years ago)
i wonder who buys/downloads more fake trump sex tapes - huge trump supporters or those who hate him?
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:15 (seven years ago)
people who have run out of ipecac
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:17 (seven years ago)
hfs @ that Moore story - now *that's* an oppo dump
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:18 (seven years ago)
"i could make a snuff tape in the middle of Bulgaria and i wouldn't lose voters"
― omar little, Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:19 (seven years ago)
Yeah I presume the whole point of producing fake Trump sex tapes is precisely as omar says: to provide cover for the real one.
"Boy who cried wolf" kinda thing. Or, more like "tape that showed pee."
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:20 (seven years ago)
http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/print-covers/20171111_cuk400.jpg
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:27 (seven years ago)
Holy shit at that Moore story.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:39 (seven years ago)
tbf Moore's voters all enthusiastically backed the pussy-grabber so may not move that many votes but who knows
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:40 (seven years ago)
At least the pussy grabber is a hedonistic godless heathen.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:42 (seven years ago)
Dems' tax bill message is complicated by the presence of the standard deduction doubling in the present bill. A hell of a lot of people in the median income range will read that, figure it will help them, and stop there.
imo, the dems need to drive home endlessly that they aren't against that provision, as the first thing out of their mouths. Then they can detail their opposition to the worst crap, like ending the Alternative Minimum Tax and the estate tax. They need to emphasize how happy they'd be to double the standard deduction, but how the bill would raise the deficit by $1.5 TRILLION and of that new debt, $XXX would go straight into the pockets of the top 1%.
― A is for (Aimless), Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:43 (seven years ago)
arguing about the nat'l deficit is not the way to go about opposing this bill.
yelling that it's benefits are all tilted toward the rich, in no uncertain terms, will. And specific provisions like repealing the state/local tax deduction will totally split votes off the GOP (at least in the House).
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:45 (seven years ago)
that moore news seems like the kind of news that could suppress republican turnout in AL, even if it doesn't change minds. my understanding is he's starting from a place not a ton more popular than joe arpaio is statewide in AZ, i.e. not very any more. his main virtue is he's a republican in alabama, which is obviously a huge advantage one, but other than that, he's about as beatable a candidate as they could have chosen.
and hopefully it (along with the VA results) will encourage some national help for doug jones, because this from yesterday is not good:https://www.thedailybeast.com/after-big-wins-top-democrats-still-shying-away-from-alabama-special-election
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:51 (seven years ago)
agree on all that
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:52 (seven years ago)
stopping this tax plan should be the Dems #1 priority right now. all hell's gonna break loose in the GOP if they can't get that done.
― frogbs, Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:54 (seven years ago)
Breitbart: Maybe Roy Moore dated kids but if he did he was romantic and read them poetry pic.twitter.com/yVYDCFc6Gp— Will Rahn (@willrahn) November 9, 2017
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:54 (seven years ago)
voting a pedophile to seriously own the libs right now
― frogbs, Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:55 (seven years ago)
the DNC guys are right that sending in Obama or another nat'l figure wouldn't help Jones and would probably hurt him/rile up the GOP - but what does help is money and operational/logistical support to boost turnout
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 18:57 (seven years ago)
Biden going was probably best-case-scenario for nat'l figure support
I don't get why you wouldn't spend money on this race: if Jones loses by a couple points, that's a headline too. Making the GOP run scared will embolden small donors into giving more dough.
But what do I know.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:00 (seven years ago)
Finding a strategy for increasing democratic votes in the rural south is a damned tricky business, because the GOP has occupied two of the biggest and most obvious niches: racists and fundamentalists. Staking claim to economic issues doesn't seem to budge those people away from their basic tribal identities. A good sex scandal might have some legs with the evangelicals, though.
― A is for (Aimless), Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:00 (seven years ago)
Polling from Alabama seems to be all over the place, from a tied race a month ago to Moore up by double digits to Moore up by single digits. None have shown Jones ahead so far, which of course doesn't bode well, but the goal here is obviously some last minute upset, and this is the kind of bombshell (esp if there's actually more to it) that produces that kind of thing.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:02 (seven years ago)
What a pussy, Moore refusing to debate Jones.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:03 (seven years ago)
At the least there should be a significant gotv effort, because if/when Moore wins, not only will that mean a full-on crazy fundamentalist is in the senate, but the GOP will crow "see, so much for the blue wave."
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:04 (seven years ago)
A good sex scandal might have some legs with the evangelicals, though.
remember who they voted for in 2016 tho
― frogbs, Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:06 (seven years ago)
USA Today:
Former Trump campaign adviser Roger Stone sent out an email Thursday asking supporters to help him raise $500,000 to clear his name of any wrongdoing in the investigation of Russian interference in last year’s presidential election.
“Friend, I’m facing a $500K price tag to clear my name of the Deep State’s baseless charges!” the flamboyant Republican consultant wrote in his fundraising appeal, which asked supporters to contribute from $25 to “even $100 or more immediately.”
Stone wrote that the “legal assault” against him has already cost him more than $100,000 in legal fees.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:13 (seven years ago)
I know it's bad to even wonder, but the fact that Moore is southern and so is the youngster might cut through the tribal lines differently for southern evangelicals than Trump's sexual assaults on northern women.
― A is for (Aimless), Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:14 (seven years ago)
Wrong. As Οὖτις said, the Democratic message needs to be 11 words long: "Under this plan, you can't deduct your state income taxes anymore."
Also, McConnell is already gently pushing Moore, saying "If the allegations are true, he must step aside."
― grawlix (unperson), Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:15 (seven years ago)
Wrong.
Well, thank goodness at least you know what's right!
― A is for (Aimless), Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:17 (seven years ago)
wasn't Stone the dude who openly bragged about getting access to Russian intel
― frogbs, Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:18 (seven years ago)
xpAlso that Trump's targets were starlets and models as opposed to "innocent" teenagers.
― nickn, Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:18 (seven years ago)
"If the allegations are true ..." What does even mean, Mitch? The claims of several victims not enough? Considering Moore's default is beyond the pale psychopath, even by GOP standards, what else do you want? A trial?
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:22 (seven years ago)
Apparently from Moore's law school professor:
"In law school, the arguments arose from what Disraeli called "falling into a deep groove of illogic and being helpless to allow reason to pull you out." If Moore's analysis of a case was tantamount to thinking 1 + 1 = 3, and his classmates reasoned otherwise, there was no backing down by Moore. The class was willing to fight to the death against illogic that no legal mind but one in America would espouse. Moore never won one argument, and the debates got ugly and personal. The result: gone was the fulfillment a teacher hopes for in the still peace of logic and learning. I had no choice but to abandon the Socratic method of class participation in favor of the lecture mode because of one student: Roy Moore."
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:23 (seven years ago)
"if the allegations are true" is kind of a useless statement btw since there is unlikely to be physical or eyewitness evidence. do we really think these guys are going to jump ship after what we saw with trump?
― k3vin k., Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:24 (seven years ago)
― sleeve, Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:24 (seven years ago)
is this some backdoor way of trying to get Strange on the ballot cuz no way does McConnell want Dougie to win
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:24 (seven years ago)
lots of GOP sens saying he should step down "if true":
JUST IN: Sen @SteveDaines , who endorsed Roy Moore: “These are very serious allegations and if true he should step down”— Frank Thorp V (@frankthorp) November 9, 2017
etc. see thread
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:31 (seven years ago)
the fact that Moore is southern and so is the youngster might cut through the tribal lines differently for southern evangelicals
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:31 (seven years ago)
ty. I've never spent any time in the south and bow to superior knowledge.
― A is for (Aimless), Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:33 (seven years ago)
Still no word from a number of normally chatty House Republicans who endorsed Roy Moore.A few of them are usually pretty quick to return texts...— Matt Fuller (@MEPFuller) November 9, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:33 (seven years ago)
damn that's some serious "knives out" shit from sitting GOP Senators, they really hate this guy
doubt any GOPers in AL give a fuck what some other Senator thinks tho
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:34 (seven years ago)
well at least Kamala's on her game
Donate now to support Doug Jones — a candidate with integrity running for Senate in Alabama.https://t.co/857LZwCn91— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) November 9, 2017
So I was right forty minutes ago!
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:36 (seven years ago)
Donated. I've hated this fucking asshole for years.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:37 (seven years ago)
Jones seems like a good guy, and Moore is literally the worst (worse than Trump, even).
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:38 (seven years ago)
McConnell trying to get some Strange?
In by a backdoor?
Now you've got my attention.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:44 (seven years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/mitch-mcconnell-and-chorus-of-republican-senators-call-on-roy-moore-to-step-aside-in-alabama-senate-race/2017/11/09/4e6da1d2-c57b-11e7-84bc-5e285c7f4512_story.html
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:58 (seven years ago)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2017/11/09/why-has-fox-news-abandoned-benghazi/?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-b%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
― j., Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:00 (seven years ago)
can we just get rid of Alabama fuck that place
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:02 (seven years ago)
I am pretty sure I still have relatives I haven't met yet who live there so no
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:03 (seven years ago)
I spent some time in Birmingham once, was nice. One of the best civil rights museums I've ever visited, and elsewhere I toured a haunted abandoned steel factory.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:06 (seven years ago)
I wish y'all would stop posting WaPo stories that many of us can't read!
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:07 (seven years ago)
no "if"
The allegations against Roy Moore are deeply disturbing and disqualifying. He should immediately step aside and allow the people of Alabama to elect a candidate they can be proud of.— John McCain (@SenJohnMcCain) November 9, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:08 (seven years ago)
it's just mind blowing that if this dude doesn't step down he still has a chance of winning after he has demonstrated to be worse than scum
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:08 (seven years ago)
why can't you read them? xxp
paywall
― Moodles, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:09 (seven years ago)
A growing chorus of Senate Republicans including Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) have called on Senate candidate Roy Moore to withdraw from a special election in Alabama in the wake of allegations that the former judge initiated a sexual encounter with a 14-year-old girl nearly four decades ago.“If these allegations are true, he must step aside,” McConnell said in a formal statement on behalf of all Republican senators.Other Republican senators weighing in included Jeff Flake of Arizona, David Perdue of Georgia, John Thune of South Dakota, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Cory Gardner of Colorado, Richard C. Shelby of Alabama and Patrick J. Toomey of Pennsylvania.Under Alabama state law, the ballot cannot be changed within 76 days of an election, which in this case is scheduled for Dec. 12. But a candidate can still withdraw or a state party can request a state judge or the secretary of state to disqualify a candidate from the race.In the event of either disqualification or withdrawal, the appropriate state canvassing boards would not certify any votes cast for Moore.“It’s understandable why you would set your deadline so far in advance,” said Derek Muller, a professor at Pepperdine Law School. “We have so much early voting. We have so much overseas voting.”Alabama state law does allow write-in votes to be cast in general elections, as long as the names are for living people and written in without using a rubber stamp or stick-on label. Muller said Sen. Luther Strange (R-Ala.), who lost in the primary to Moore, would be an eligible write-in candidate.The Washington Post published an extensive report Thursday describing Moore’s relationships with the then-14-year-old and three other girls he pursued when they were between the ages of 16 and 18.None of the women sought out The Post. While reporting a story in Alabama about supporters of Moore’s Senate campaign, a Post reporter heard that Moore allegedly had sought relationships with teenage girls.Over the ensuing three weeks, two Post reporters contacted and interviewed the four women. All were initially reluctant to speak publicly but chose to do so after multiple interviews, saying they thought it was important for people to know about their interactions with Moore. The women say they don’t know one another.McConnell’s inner circle spent late Thursday morning discussing the repercussions and how Republicans should move forward — and grousing that if Strange, their preferred candidate in the primary, was still the nominee, they would not be answering questions about Moore’s conduct.“If it’s true, the Republican Party doesn’t have any place for pedophiles and he should step down immediately,” said Josh Holmes, a longtime McConnell confidant and his former chief of staff. “Steve Bannon is responsible,” he added about the McConnell foil and former White House chief strategist, for enabling candidates such Moore who are out of the GOP mainstream.That view was shared by Scott Reed, a political strategist for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, who opposed Moore’s nomination. “Here we go — another Steve Bannon special,” Reed said.
“If these allegations are true, he must step aside,” McConnell said in a formal statement on behalf of all Republican senators.
Other Republican senators weighing in included Jeff Flake of Arizona, David Perdue of Georgia, John Thune of South Dakota, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Cory Gardner of Colorado, Richard C. Shelby of Alabama and Patrick J. Toomey of Pennsylvania.
Under Alabama state law, the ballot cannot be changed within 76 days of an election, which in this case is scheduled for Dec. 12. But a candidate can still withdraw or a state party can request a state judge or the secretary of state to disqualify a candidate from the race.
In the event of either disqualification or withdrawal, the appropriate state canvassing boards would not certify any votes cast for Moore.
“It’s understandable why you would set your deadline so far in advance,” said Derek Muller, a professor at Pepperdine Law School. “We have so much early voting. We have so much overseas voting.”
Alabama state law does allow write-in votes to be cast in general elections, as long as the names are for living people and written in without using a rubber stamp or stick-on label. Muller said Sen. Luther Strange (R-Ala.), who lost in the primary to Moore, would be an eligible write-in candidate.
The Washington Post published an extensive report Thursday describing Moore’s relationships with the then-14-year-old and three other girls he pursued when they were between the ages of 16 and 18.
None of the women sought out The Post. While reporting a story in Alabama about supporters of Moore’s Senate campaign, a Post reporter heard that Moore allegedly had sought relationships with teenage girls.
Over the ensuing three weeks, two Post reporters contacted and interviewed the four women. All were initially reluctant to speak publicly but chose to do so after multiple interviews, saying they thought it was important for people to know about their interactions with Moore. The women say they don’t know one another.
McConnell’s inner circle spent late Thursday morning discussing the repercussions and how Republicans should move forward — and grousing that if Strange, their preferred candidate in the primary, was still the nominee, they would not be answering questions about Moore’s conduct.
“If it’s true, the Republican Party doesn’t have any place for pedophiles and he should step down immediately,” said Josh Holmes, a longtime McConnell confidant and his former chief of staff. “Steve Bannon is responsible,” he added about the McConnell foil and former White House chief strategist, for enabling candidates such Moore who are out of the GOP mainstream.
That view was shared by Scott Reed, a political strategist for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, who opposed Moore’s nomination. “Here we go — another Steve Bannon special,” Reed said.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:09 (seven years ago)
just open it in an incognito window
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:10 (seven years ago)
It's a good paper, you should subscribe.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:10 (seven years ago)
sometimes you can "slip through the window" by "going incognito" in "private mode", if you know what i mean
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:11 (seven years ago)
;)
― marcos, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:11 (seven years ago)
Alabama State Auditor Jim Zeigler, a Moore backer: "Even if you accept the Washington Post’s report as being completely true, it’s much ado about very little. " #ALSEN #alpolitics— Brian Lyman (@lyman_brian) November 9, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:11 (seven years ago)
Leigh Corfman says she was 14 years old when an older man approached her outside a courtroom in Etowah County, Ala. She was sitting on a wooden bench with her mother, they both recall, when the man introduced himself as Roy Moore.It was early 1979 and Moore — now the Republican nominee in Alabama for a U.S. Senate seat — was a 32-year-old assistant district attorney. He struck up a conversation, Corfman and her mother say, and offered to watch the girl while her mother went inside for a child custody hearing.“He said, ‘Oh, you don’t want her to go in there and hear all that. I’ll stay out here with her,’ ” says Corfman’s mother, Nancy Wells, 71. “I thought, how nice for him to want to take care of my little girl.”Alone with Corfman, Moore chatted with her and asked for her phone number, she says. Days later, she says, he picked her up around the corner from her house in Gadsden, drove her about 30 minutes to his home in the woods, told her how pretty she was and kissed her. On a second visit, she says, he took off her shirt and pants and removed his clothes. He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear.“I wanted it over with — I wanted out,” she remembers thinking. “Please just get this over with. Whatever this is, just get it over.” Corfman says she asked Moore to take her home, and he did.Two of Corfman’s childhood friends say she told them at the time that she was seeing an older man, and one says Corfman identified the man as Moore. Wells says her daughter told her about the encounter more than a decade later, as Moore was becoming more prominent as a local judge.Aside from Corfman, three other women interviewed by The Washington Post in recent weeks say Moore pursued them when they were between the ages of 16 and 18 and he was in his early 30s, episodes they say they found flattering at the time, but troubling as they got older. None of the women say that Moore forced them into any sort of relationship or sexual contact.Wendy Miller says she was 14 and working as a Santa’s helper at the Gadsden Mall when Moore first approached her, and 16 when he asked her on dates, which her mother forbade. Debbie Wesson Gibson says she was 17 when Moore spoke to her high school civics class and asked her out on the first of several dates that did not progress beyond kissing. Gloria Thacker Deason says she was an 18-year-old cheerleader when Moore began taking her on dates that included bottles of Mateus Rosé wine. The legal drinking age in Alabama was 19. Of the four women, the youngest at the time was Corfman, who is the only one who says she had sexual contact with Moore that went beyond kissing. She says they did not have intercourse.In a written statement, Moore denied the allegations.“These allegations are completely false and are a desperate political attack by the National Democrat Party and the Washington Post on this campaign,” Moore, now 70, said.The campaign said in a subsequent statement that if the allegations were true they would have surfaced during his previous campaigns, adding “this garbage is the very definition of fake news.”According to campaign reports, none of the women have donated to or worked for Moore’s Democratic opponent, Doug Jones, or his rivals in the Republican primary, including Sen. Luther Strange, whom he defeated this fall in a runoff election.Corfman, 53, who works as a customer service representative at a payday loan business, says she has voted for Republicans in the past three presidential elections, including for Donald Trump in 2016. She says she thought of confronting Moore personally for years, and almost came forward publicly during his first campaign for state Supreme Court in 2000, but decided against it. Her two children were still in school then and she worried about how it would affect them. She also was concerned that her background — three divorces and a messy financial history — might undermine her credibility.“There is no one here that doesn’t know that I’m not an angel,” Corfman says, referring to her home town of Gadsden.Corfman described her story consistently in six interviews with The Post. The Post confirmed that her mother attended a hearing at the courthouse in February 1979 through divorce records. Moore’s office was down the hall from the courtroom.Neither Corfman nor any of the other women sought out The Post. While reporting a story in Alabama about supporters of Moore’s Senate campaign, a Post reporter heard that Moore allegedly had sought relationships with teenage girls. Over the ensuing three weeks, two Post reporters contacted and interviewed the four women. All were initially reluctant to speak publicly but chose to do so after multiple interviews, saying they thought it was important for people to know about their interactions with Moore. The women say they don’t know one another.“I have prayed over this,” Corfman says, explaining why she decided to tell her story now. “All I know is that I can’t sit back and let this continue, let him continue without the mask being removed.”This account is based on interviews with more than 30 people who said they knew Moore between 1977 and 1982, when he served as an assistant district attorney for Etowah County in northern Alabama, where he grew up.****Moore was 30 and single when he joined the district attorney’s office, his first government job after attending the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, serving in Vietnam, graduating from law school and working briefly as a lawyer in private practice in Gadsden, the county seat.By his account, chronicled in his book “So Help Me God,” Moore spent his time as a prosecutor convicting “murderers, rapists, thieves and drug pushers.” He writes that it was “around this time that I fashioned a plaque of The Ten Commandments on two redwood tablets.”“I believed that many of the young criminals whom I had to prosecute would not have committed criminal acts if they had been taught these rules as children,” Moore writes.Outside work, Moore writes that he spent his free time building rooms onto a mobile home in Gallant, a rural area about 25 miles west of Gadsden.According to colleagues and others who knew him at the time, Moore was rarely seen socializing outside work. He spent one season coaching the Gallant Girls, a softball team that his teenage sister had joined, said several women who played on the team. He spent time working out at the Gadsden YMCA, according to people who encountered him there. And he often walked, usually alone, around the newly opened Gadsden Mall — 6 feet tall and well-dressed in slacks and a button-down shirt, say several women who worked there at the time.Corfman describes herself as a little lost — “a typical 14-year-old kid of a divorced family” — when she says she first met Moore that day in 1979 outside the courtroom. She says she felt flattered that a grown man was paying attention to her.“He was charming and smiley,” she says.After her mother went into the courtroom, Corfman says, Moore asked her where she went to school, what she liked to do and whether he could call her sometime. She remembers giving him her number and says he called not long after. She says she talked to Moore on her phone in her bedroom, and they made plans for him to pick her up at Alcott Road and Riley Street, around the corner from her house.“I was kind of giddy, excited, you know? An older guy, you know?” Corfman says, adding that her only sexual experience at that point had been kissing boys her age.She says that it was dark and cold when he picked her up, and that she thought they were going out to eat. Instead, she says, he drove her to his house, which seemed “far, far away.”“I remember the further I got from my house, the more nervous I got,” Corfman says.She remembers an unpaved driveway. She remembers going inside and him giving her alcohol on this visit or the next, and that at some point she told him she was 14. She says they sat and talked. She remembers that Moore told her she was pretty, put his arm around her and kissed her, and that she began to feel nervous and asked him to take her home, which she says he did.Soon after, she says, he called again, and picked her up again at the same spot.“This was a new experience, and it was exciting and fun and scary,” Corfman says, explaining why she went back. “It was just like this roller-coaster ride you’ve not been on.”She says that Moore drove her back to the same house after dark, and that before long she was lying on a blanket on the floor. She remembers Moore disappearing into another room and coming out with nothing on but “tight white” underwear.She remembers that Moore kissed her, that he took off her pants and shirt, and that he touched her through her bra and underpants. She says that he guided her hand to his underwear and that she yanked her hand back.“I wasn’t ready for that — I had never put my hand on a man’s penis, much less an erect one,” Corfman says.She remembers thinking, “I don’t want to do this” and “I need to get out of here.” She says that she got dressed and asked Moore to take her home, and that he did.The legal age of consent in Alabama, then and now, is 16. Under Alabama law in 1979, and today, a person who is at least 19 years old who has sexual contact with someone between 12 and 16 years old has committed sexual abuse in the second degree. Sexual contact is defined as touching of sexual or intimate parts. The crime is a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail.The law then and now also includes a section on enticing a child younger than 16 to enter a home with the purpose of proposing sexual intercourse or fondling of sexual and genital parts. That is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison.In Alabama, the statute of limitations for bringing felony charges involving sexual abuse of a minor in 1979 would have run out three years later, and the time frame for filing a civil complaint would have ended when the alleged victim turned 21, according to Child USA, a nonprofit research and advocacy group at the University of Pennsylvania.Corfman never filed a police report or a civil suit.She says that after their last encounter, Moore called again, but that she found an excuse to avoid seeing him. She says that at some point during or soon after her meetings with Moore, she told two friends in vague terms that she was seeing an older man.Betsy Davis, who remains friendly with Corfman and now lives in Los Angeles, says she clearly remembers Corfman talking about seeing an older man named Roy Moore when they were teenagers. She says Corfman described an encounter in which the older man wore nothing but tight white underwear. She says she was firm with Corfman that seeing someone as old as Moore was out of bounds.“I remember talking to her and telling her it’s not a good idea,” Davis says. “Because we were so young.”A second friend, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of losing her job, has a similar memory of a teenage Corfman telling her about seeing an older man.After talking to her friends, Corfman says, she began to feel that she had done something wrong and kept it a secret for years.“I felt responsible,” she says. “I felt like I had done something bad. And it kind of set the course for me doing other things that were bad.”She says that her teenage life became increasingly reckless with drinking, drugs, boyfriends, and a suicide attempt when she was 16.As the years went on, Corfman says, she did not share her story about Moore partly because of the trouble in her life. She has had three divorces and financial problems. While living in Arizona, she and her second husband started a screen-printing business that fell into debt. They filed for bankruptcy protection three times, once in 1991 with $139,689 in unpaid claims brought by the Internal Revenue Service and other creditors, according to court records.In 2005, Corfman paid a fine for driving a boat without lights. In 2010, she was working at a convenience store when she was charged with a misdemeanor for selling beer to a minor. The charge was dismissed, court records show.****The three other women who spoke to The Post say that Moore asked them on dates when they were between 16 and 18 and he was in his early 30s.Gloria Thacker Deason says she was 18 and Moore was 32 when they met in 1979 at the Gadsden Mall, where she worked at the jewelry counter of a department store called Pizitz. She says she was attending Gadsden State Community College and still living at home.“My mom was really, really strict and my curfew was 10:30 but she would let me stay out later with Roy,” says Deason, who is now 57 and lives in North Carolina. “She just felt like I would be safe with him. . . . She thought he was good husband material.”Deason says that they dated off and on for several months and that he took her to his house at least two times. She says their physical relationship did not go further than kissing and hugging.“He liked Eddie Rabbitt and I liked Freddie Mercury,” Deason says, referring to the country singer and the British rocker.She says that Moore would pick her up for dates at the mall or at college basketball games, where she was a cheerleader. She remembers changing out of her uniform before they went out for dinners at a pizzeria called Mater’s, where she says Moore would order bottles of Mateus Rosé, or at a Chinese restaurant, where she says he would order her tropical cocktails at a time when she believes she was younger than 19, the legal drinking age.“If Mother had known that, she would have had a hissy fit,” says Deason, who says she turned 19 in May 1979, after she and Moore started dating.Around the same time that Deason says she met Moore at the jewelry counter, Wendy Miller says that Moore approached her at the mall, where she would spend time with her mom, who worked at a photo booth there. Miller says this was in 1979, when she was 16.She says that Moore’s face was familiar because she had first met him two years before, when she was dressed as an elf and working as a Santa’s helper at the mall. She says that Moore told her she looked pretty, and that two years later, he began asking her out on dates in the presence of her mother at the photo booth. She says she had a boyfriend at the time, and declined.Her mother, Martha Brackett, says she refused to grant Moore permission to date her 16-year-old daughter.“I’d say, ‘You’re too old for her . . . let’s not rob the cradle,’ ” Brackett recalls telling Moore.Miller, who is now 54 and still lives in Alabama, says she was “flattered by the attention.”“Now that I’ve gotten older,” she says, “the idea that a grown man would want to take out a teenager, that’s disgusting to me.” Debbie Wesson Gibson says that she was 17 in the spring of 1981 when Moore spoke to her Etowah High School civics class about serving as the assistant district attorney. She says that when he asked her out, she asked her mother what she would say if she wanted to date a 34-year-old man. Gibson says her mother asked her who the man was, and when Gibson said “Roy Moore,” her mother said, “I’d say you were the luckiest girl in the world.”Among locals in Gadsden, a town of about 47,000 back then, Moore “had this godlike, almost deity status — he was a hometown boy made good,” Gibson says, “West Point and so forth.”Gibson says that they dated for two to three months, and that he took her to his house, read her poetry and played his guitar. She says he kissed her once in his bedroom and once by the pool at a local country club.“Looking back, I’m glad nothing bad happened,” says Gibson, who now lives in Florida. “As a mother of daughters, I realize that our age difference at that time made our dating inappropriate.”****By 1982, Moore was by his own account in his book causing a stir in the district attorney’s office for his willingness to criticize the workings of the local legal system. He convened a grand jury to look into what he alleged were funding problems in the sheriff’s office. In response, Moore writes, the state bar association investigated him for going against the advice of the district attorney, an inquiry that was dismissed.Soon after, Moore quit and began his first political campaign for the county’s circuit court judge position. He lost overwhelmingly, and left Alabama shortly thereafter, heading to Texas, where he says in his book that he trained as a kickboxer, and to Australia, where he says he lived on a ranch for a year wrangling cattle.He returned to Gadsden in 1984 and went into private law practice. In 1985, at age 38, he married Kayla Kisor, who was 24. The two are still married.A few years later, Moore began his rise in Alabama politics and into the national spotlight.In 1992, he became a circuit court judge and hung his wooden Ten Commandments plaque in his courtroom.In 2000, he was elected chief justice of Alabama’s Supreme Court, and he soon installed a 5,280-pound granite Ten Commandments monument in the judicial building.In 2003, he was dismissed from the bench for ignoring a federal court order to remove the monument, and became known nationally as “The Ten Commandments Judge.”Moore was again elected chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court in 2012, and was again dismissed for ignoring a judicial order, this time for instructing probate judges not to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.All of this has made Moore a hero to many Alabama voters, who consider him a stalwart Christian willing to stand up for their values. In a September Republican primary for the seat vacated by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Moore defeated the appointed sitting senator, Luther Strange, who was backed by President Trump and other party leaders in Washington. Moore faces the Democratic nominee, Doug Jones, in a special election scheduled for Dec. 12.On a visit home in the mid-1990s to see her mother and stepfather in Alabama, Corfman says, she saw Moore’s photo in the Gadsden Times.“ ‘Mother, do you remember this guy?’ ” Wells says Corfman said at the time.That’s when Corfman told her, Wells recalls. Her daughter said that not long after the court hearing in 1979, Moore took her to his house. Wells says that her daughter conveyed to her that Moore had behaved inappropriately.“I was horrified,” Wells says.Years later, Corfman says, she saw a segment about Moore on ABC News’s “Good Morning America.” She says she threw up.There were times, Corfman says, she thought about confronting Moore. At one point during the late 1990s, she says, she became so angry that she drove to the parking lot outside Moore’s office at the county courthouse in Gadsden. She sat there for a while, she says, rehearsing what she might say to him.“ ‘Remember me?’ ” she imagined herself saying.
It was early 1979 and Moore — now the Republican nominee in Alabama for a U.S. Senate seat — was a 32-year-old assistant district attorney. He struck up a conversation, Corfman and her mother say, and offered to watch the girl while her mother went inside for a child custody hearing.
“He said, ‘Oh, you don’t want her to go in there and hear all that. I’ll stay out here with her,’ ” says Corfman’s mother, Nancy Wells, 71. “I thought, how nice for him to want to take care of my little girl.”
Alone with Corfman, Moore chatted with her and asked for her phone number, she says. Days later, she says, he picked her up around the corner from her house in Gadsden, drove her about 30 minutes to his home in the woods, told her how pretty she was and kissed her. On a second visit, she says, he took off her shirt and pants and removed his clothes. He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear.
“I wanted it over with — I wanted out,” she remembers thinking. “Please just get this over with. Whatever this is, just get it over.” Corfman says she asked Moore to take her home, and he did.
Two of Corfman’s childhood friends say she told them at the time that she was seeing an older man, and one says Corfman identified the man as Moore. Wells says her daughter told her about the encounter more than a decade later, as Moore was becoming more prominent as a local judge.
Aside from Corfman, three other women interviewed by The Washington Post in recent weeks say Moore pursued them when they were between the ages of 16 and 18 and he was in his early 30s, episodes they say they found flattering at the time, but troubling as they got older. None of the women say that Moore forced them into any sort of relationship or sexual contact.
Wendy Miller says she was 14 and working as a Santa’s helper at the Gadsden Mall when Moore first approached her, and 16 when he asked her on dates, which her mother forbade. Debbie Wesson Gibson says she was 17 when Moore spoke to her high school civics class and asked her out on the first of several dates that did not progress beyond kissing. Gloria Thacker Deason says she was an 18-year-old cheerleader when Moore began taking her on dates that included bottles of Mateus Rosé wine. The legal drinking age in Alabama was 19.
Of the four women, the youngest at the time was Corfman, who is the only one who says she had sexual contact with Moore that went beyond kissing. She says they did not have intercourse.
In a written statement, Moore denied the allegations.
“These allegations are completely false and are a desperate political attack by the National Democrat Party and the Washington Post on this campaign,” Moore, now 70, said.
The campaign said in a subsequent statement that if the allegations were true they would have surfaced during his previous campaigns, adding “this garbage is the very definition of fake news.”
According to campaign reports, none of the women have donated to or worked for Moore’s Democratic opponent, Doug Jones, or his rivals in the Republican primary, including Sen. Luther Strange, whom he defeated this fall in a runoff election.
Corfman, 53, who works as a customer service representative at a payday loan business, says she has voted for Republicans in the past three presidential elections, including for Donald Trump in 2016. She says she thought of confronting Moore personally for years, and almost came forward publicly during his first campaign for state Supreme Court in 2000, but decided against it. Her two children were still in school then and she worried about how it would affect them. She also was concerned that her background — three divorces and a messy financial history — might undermine her credibility.
“There is no one here that doesn’t know that I’m not an angel,” Corfman says, referring to her home town of Gadsden.
Corfman described her story consistently in six interviews with The Post. The Post confirmed that her mother attended a hearing at the courthouse in February 1979 through divorce records. Moore’s office was down the hall from the courtroom.
Neither Corfman nor any of the other women sought out The Post. While reporting a story in Alabama about supporters of Moore’s Senate campaign, a Post reporter heard that Moore allegedly had sought relationships with teenage girls. Over the ensuing three weeks, two Post reporters contacted and interviewed the four women. All were initially reluctant to speak publicly but chose to do so after multiple interviews, saying they thought it was important for people to know about their interactions with Moore. The women say they don’t know one another.
“I have prayed over this,” Corfman says, explaining why she decided to tell her story now. “All I know is that I can’t sit back and let this continue, let him continue without the mask being removed.”
This account is based on interviews with more than 30 people who said they knew Moore between 1977 and 1982, when he served as an assistant district attorney for Etowah County in northern Alabama, where he grew up.
****
Moore was 30 and single when he joined the district attorney’s office, his first government job after attending the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, serving in Vietnam, graduating from law school and working briefly as a lawyer in private practice in Gadsden, the county seat.
By his account, chronicled in his book “So Help Me God,” Moore spent his time as a prosecutor convicting “murderers, rapists, thieves and drug pushers.” He writes that it was “around this time that I fashioned a plaque of The Ten Commandments on two redwood tablets.”
“I believed that many of the young criminals whom I had to prosecute would not have committed criminal acts if they had been taught these rules as children,” Moore writes.
Outside work, Moore writes that he spent his free time building rooms onto a mobile home in Gallant, a rural area about 25 miles west of Gadsden.
According to colleagues and others who knew him at the time, Moore was rarely seen socializing outside work. He spent one season coaching the Gallant Girls, a softball team that his teenage sister had joined, said several women who played on the team. He spent time working out at the Gadsden YMCA, according to people who encountered him there. And he often walked, usually alone, around the newly opened Gadsden Mall — 6 feet tall and well-dressed in slacks and a button-down shirt, say several women who worked there at the time.
Corfman describes herself as a little lost — “a typical 14-year-old kid of a divorced family” — when she says she first met Moore that day in 1979 outside the courtroom. She says she felt flattered that a grown man was paying attention to her.
“He was charming and smiley,” she says.
After her mother went into the courtroom, Corfman says, Moore asked her where she went to school, what she liked to do and whether he could call her sometime. She remembers giving him her number and says he called not long after. She says she talked to Moore on her phone in her bedroom, and they made plans for him to pick her up at Alcott Road and Riley Street, around the corner from her house.
“I was kind of giddy, excited, you know? An older guy, you know?” Corfman says, adding that her only sexual experience at that point had been kissing boys her age.
She says that it was dark and cold when he picked her up, and that she thought they were going out to eat. Instead, she says, he drove her to his house, which seemed “far, far away.”
“I remember the further I got from my house, the more nervous I got,” Corfman says.
She remembers an unpaved driveway. She remembers going inside and him giving her alcohol on this visit or the next, and that at some point she told him she was 14. She says they sat and talked. She remembers that Moore told her she was pretty, put his arm around her and kissed her, and that she began to feel nervous and asked him to take her home, which she says he did.
Soon after, she says, he called again, and picked her up again at the same spot.
“This was a new experience, and it was exciting and fun and scary,” Corfman says, explaining why she went back. “It was just like this roller-coaster ride you’ve not been on.”
She says that Moore drove her back to the same house after dark, and that before long she was lying on a blanket on the floor. She remembers Moore disappearing into another room and coming out with nothing on but “tight white” underwear.
She remembers that Moore kissed her, that he took off her pants and shirt, and that he touched her through her bra and underpants. She says that he guided her hand to his underwear and that she yanked her hand back.
“I wasn’t ready for that — I had never put my hand on a man’s penis, much less an erect one,” Corfman says.
She remembers thinking, “I don’t want to do this” and “I need to get out of here.” She says that she got dressed and asked Moore to take her home, and that he did.
The legal age of consent in Alabama, then and now, is 16. Under Alabama law in 1979, and today, a person who is at least 19 years old who has sexual contact with someone between 12 and 16 years old has committed sexual abuse in the second degree. Sexual contact is defined as touching of sexual or intimate parts. The crime is a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in jail.
The law then and now also includes a section on enticing a child younger than 16 to enter a home with the purpose of proposing sexual intercourse or fondling of sexual and genital parts. That is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison.
In Alabama, the statute of limitations for bringing felony charges involving sexual abuse of a minor in 1979 would have run out three years later, and the time frame for filing a civil complaint would have ended when the alleged victim turned 21, according to Child USA, a nonprofit research and advocacy group at the University of Pennsylvania.
Corfman never filed a police report or a civil suit.
She says that after their last encounter, Moore called again, but that she found an excuse to avoid seeing him. She says that at some point during or soon after her meetings with Moore, she told two friends in vague terms that she was seeing an older man.
Betsy Davis, who remains friendly with Corfman and now lives in Los Angeles, says she clearly remembers Corfman talking about seeing an older man named Roy Moore when they were teenagers. She says Corfman described an encounter in which the older man wore nothing but tight white underwear. She says she was firm with Corfman that seeing someone as old as Moore was out of bounds.
“I remember talking to her and telling her it’s not a good idea,” Davis says. “Because we were so young.”
A second friend, who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of losing her job, has a similar memory of a teenage Corfman telling her about seeing an older man.
After talking to her friends, Corfman says, she began to feel that she had done something wrong and kept it a secret for years.
“I felt responsible,” she says. “I felt like I had done something bad. And it kind of set the course for me doing other things that were bad.”
She says that her teenage life became increasingly reckless with drinking, drugs, boyfriends, and a suicide attempt when she was 16.
As the years went on, Corfman says, she did not share her story about Moore partly because of the trouble in her life. She has had three divorces and financial problems. While living in Arizona, she and her second husband started a screen-printing business that fell into debt. They filed for bankruptcy protection three times, once in 1991 with $139,689 in unpaid claims brought by the Internal Revenue Service and other creditors, according to court records.
In 2005, Corfman paid a fine for driving a boat without lights. In 2010, she was working at a convenience store when she was charged with a misdemeanor for selling beer to a minor. The charge was dismissed, court records show.
The three other women who spoke to The Post say that Moore asked them on dates when they were between 16 and 18 and he was in his early 30s.
Gloria Thacker Deason says she was 18 and Moore was 32 when they met in 1979 at the Gadsden Mall, where she worked at the jewelry counter of a department store called Pizitz. She says she was attending Gadsden State Community College and still living at home.
“My mom was really, really strict and my curfew was 10:30 but she would let me stay out later with Roy,” says Deason, who is now 57 and lives in North Carolina. “She just felt like I would be safe with him. . . . She thought he was good husband material.”
Deason says that they dated off and on for several months and that he took her to his house at least two times. She says their physical relationship did not go further than kissing and hugging.
“He liked Eddie Rabbitt and I liked Freddie Mercury,” Deason says, referring to the country singer and the British rocker.
She says that Moore would pick her up for dates at the mall or at college basketball games, where she was a cheerleader. She remembers changing out of her uniform before they went out for dinners at a pizzeria called Mater’s, where she says Moore would order bottles of Mateus Rosé, or at a Chinese restaurant, where she says he would order her tropical cocktails at a time when she believes she was younger than 19, the legal drinking age.
“If Mother had known that, she would have had a hissy fit,” says Deason, who says she turned 19 in May 1979, after she and Moore started dating.
Around the same time that Deason says she met Moore at the jewelry counter, Wendy Miller says that Moore approached her at the mall, where she would spend time with her mom, who worked at a photo booth there. Miller says this was in 1979, when she was 16.
She says that Moore’s face was familiar because she had first met him two years before, when she was dressed as an elf and working as a Santa’s helper at the mall. She says that Moore told her she looked pretty, and that two years later, he began asking her out on dates in the presence of her mother at the photo booth. She says she had a boyfriend at the time, and declined.
Her mother, Martha Brackett, says she refused to grant Moore permission to date her 16-year-old daughter.
“I’d say, ‘You’re too old for her . . . let’s not rob the cradle,’ ” Brackett recalls telling Moore.
Miller, who is now 54 and still lives in Alabama, says she was “flattered by the attention.”
“Now that I’ve gotten older,” she says, “the idea that a grown man would want to take out a teenager, that’s disgusting to me.”
Debbie Wesson Gibson says that she was 17 in the spring of 1981 when Moore spoke to her Etowah High School civics class about serving as the assistant district attorney. She says that when he asked her out, she asked her mother what she would say if she wanted to date a 34-year-old man. Gibson says her mother asked her who the man was, and when Gibson said “Roy Moore,” her mother said, “I’d say you were the luckiest girl in the world.”
Among locals in Gadsden, a town of about 47,000 back then, Moore “had this godlike, almost deity status — he was a hometown boy made good,” Gibson says, “West Point and so forth.”
Gibson says that they dated for two to three months, and that he took her to his house, read her poetry and played his guitar. She says he kissed her once in his bedroom and once by the pool at a local country club.
“Looking back, I’m glad nothing bad happened,” says Gibson, who now lives in Florida. “As a mother of daughters, I realize that our age difference at that time made our dating inappropriate.”
By 1982, Moore was by his own account in his book causing a stir in the district attorney’s office for his willingness to criticize the workings of the local legal system. He convened a grand jury to look into what he alleged were funding problems in the sheriff’s office. In response, Moore writes, the state bar association investigated him for going against the advice of the district attorney, an inquiry that was dismissed.
Soon after, Moore quit and began his first political campaign for the county’s circuit court judge position. He lost overwhelmingly, and left Alabama shortly thereafter, heading to Texas, where he says in his book that he trained as a kickboxer, and to Australia, where he says he lived on a ranch for a year wrangling cattle.
He returned to Gadsden in 1984 and went into private law practice. In 1985, at age 38, he married Kayla Kisor, who was 24. The two are still married.
A few years later, Moore began his rise in Alabama politics and into the national spotlight.
In 1992, he became a circuit court judge and hung his wooden Ten Commandments plaque in his courtroom.
In 2000, he was elected chief justice of Alabama’s Supreme Court, and he soon installed a 5,280-pound granite Ten Commandments monument in the judicial building.
In 2003, he was dismissed from the bench for ignoring a federal court order to remove the monument, and became known nationally as “The Ten Commandments Judge.”
Moore was again elected chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court in 2012, and was again dismissed for ignoring a judicial order, this time for instructing probate judges not to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
All of this has made Moore a hero to many Alabama voters, who consider him a stalwart Christian willing to stand up for their values. In a September Republican primary for the seat vacated by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Moore defeated the appointed sitting senator, Luther Strange, who was backed by President Trump and other party leaders in Washington. Moore faces the Democratic nominee, Doug Jones, in a special election scheduled for Dec. 12.
On a visit home in the mid-1990s to see her mother and stepfather in Alabama, Corfman says, she saw Moore’s photo in the Gadsden Times.
“ ‘Mother, do you remember this guy?’ ” Wells says Corfman said at the time.
That’s when Corfman told her, Wells recalls. Her daughter said that not long after the court hearing in 1979, Moore took her to his house. Wells says that her daughter conveyed to her that Moore had behaved inappropriately.
“I was horrified,” Wells says.
Years later, Corfman says, she saw a segment about Moore on ABC News’s “Good Morning America.” She says she threw up.
There were times, Corfman says, she thought about confronting Moore. At one point during the late 1990s, she says, she became so angry that she drove to the parking lot outside Moore’s office at the county courthouse in Gadsden. She sat there for a while, she says, rehearsing what she might say to him.
“ ‘Remember me?’ ” she imagined herself saying.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:12 (seven years ago)
alfred, they will (or would, they're switching deals come jan 1) give free access to ppl with .edu addresses
― j., Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:13 (seven years ago)
.@BreitbartNews pic.twitter.com/t2me8N5pgI— antifa crisis actor (@thetomzone) November 9, 2017
tons of incredible musicians from Alabama. Fred fucking Wesley.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:13 (seven years ago)
:P
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:14 (seven years ago)
Holy shit at that Ziegler dude.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:14 (seven years ago)
― Karl Malone, Thursday, November 9, 2017
Saturday night is enough
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:16 (seven years ago)
WaPo is the only source of journalism I pay for and they are worth it imo
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:22 (seven years ago)
BREAKING: Bob Corker announces Senate hearing to examine Trump's 'authority to use nuclear weapons' on November 14thI can't stress enough how important this hearing is. If the walls of the Mueller investigation begin to close in on Trump, there is no telling what he may do.— Brian Krassenstein🐬 (@krassenstein) November 9, 2017
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:27 (seven years ago)
(BREAKING early this morning, sorry if it was mentioned upthread)
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:28 (seven years ago)
huh didn't see that one coming. Major separation of powers/Constitutional issue at the heart of it, so idk.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:30 (seven years ago)
I've had a print subscription to WaPo since, um, 1976.
Recently cut back to weekends-only and it physically hurt to do so.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:31 (seven years ago)
i disable javascript in my browser and can read all wapo stories.
― new noise, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:33 (seven years ago)
this is the kind of headline Dems need to push: "Millions will have their taxes raised under GOP tax plan"
http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/article/GOP-tax-plan-will-raise-taxes-on-lots-of-people-12345127.php
just stick an extra "while corporations and the super-rich get tax cuts" on there
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:37 (seven years ago)
I've several paper subscriptions. I should drop NYT since I can read it free using my uni library browser.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:38 (seven years ago)
why do people believe that if corporations get more money through tax breaks that they will pass that saving onto their employees in the form of higher wages ? what fucking examples do we have of this actually happening ? it pretty much never happens .xp
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:42 (seven years ago)
corporations are awash with capital at the moment and disparity in pay is at an all time high and these dudes are all of the sudden going to be generous with their earnings .?
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:44 (seven years ago)
all you guys know this shit of course. I'm just so fed up with everything more than ever lately . i'll go now
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:47 (seven years ago)
My understanding is that no serious person is seriously arguing that corporations will start people paying more if they're taxed less.
Merely, that they'll DEFINITELY start paying people _less_ if they're taxed _more_.
So it's not about things getting better, but rather about things not getting worse.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:47 (seven years ago)
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, November 9, 2017 3:42 PM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Because propaganda
― Evan, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:51 (seven years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DON_DtCUIAAeV_t.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 20:53 (seven years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RDrfE9I8_hs
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:10 (seven years ago)
Moore has denied the allegations and given no indication that he will step aside. Even if he does, McConnell and other Republicans will face the challenge of figuring out what candidate would run in Moore’s place — and how to win an election in which it is too late to replace the former judge’s name on the Dec. 12 ballot.Under Alabama state law, the ballot cannot be changed within 76 days of an election. But a candidate can still withdraw. The state party can also request that the secretary of state disqualify a candidate on the ballot, even if the candidate wants to stay in the race.In the event of either disqualification or withdrawal, the appropriate state canvassing boards would not certify any votes cast for Moore.Alabama state law does allow write-in votes to be cast in general elections, as long as the names are for living people and written in without using a rubber stamp or stick-on label. Sen. Luther Strange (R-Ala.), who lost in the primary to Moore, would be an eligible write-in candidate, said John Bennett, an official at the Alabama Secretary of State’s office.
Under Alabama state law, the ballot cannot be changed within 76 days of an election. But a candidate can still withdraw. The state party can also request that the secretary of state disqualify a candidate on the ballot, even if the candidate wants to stay in the race.
Alabama state law does allow write-in votes to be cast in general elections, as long as the names are for living people and written in without using a rubber stamp or stick-on label. Sen. Luther Strange (R-Ala.), who lost in the primary to Moore, would be an eligible write-in candidate, said John Bennett, an official at the Alabama Secretary of State’s office.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:12 (seven years ago)
xpost I didn't think I could take it, but that's funny.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:14 (seven years ago)
Wow. This defense of Roy Moore from AL state Auditor Jim Ziegler:"Take Joseph and Mary. Mary was a teenager and Joseph was an adult carpenter. They became parents of Jesus.”https://t.co/IhaWiCEFmq— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) November 9, 2017
― Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:15 (seven years ago)
take that totally common birth situation, the birth of jesus,
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:19 (seven years ago)
that analogy seems flawed for at least one very obvious reason
― Simon H., Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:20 (seven years ago)
a lot of these assholes seem to genuinely believe that Trump has ushered in the LOL NOTHING MATTERS era and that they really can get away with absolutely anything
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:21 (seven years ago)
I doubt Dougie will go too hard on this, but when he does address it I'm sure he'll just fold it into his "Roy Moore is an embarrassment to the State of Alabama" narrative, which he's been pushing for awhile. Could work.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:21 (seven years ago)
y'know I had never really considered God as a pedophile before but when you put it that way...
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:22 (seven years ago)
― Simon H., Thursday, November 9, 2017 4:20 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― marcos, Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:22 (seven years ago)
what I am hopeful for is that Moore will make some kind of statement that makes this worse. Seems likely.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:23 (seven years ago)
the angel Ziegler from Bama came, his wings as drifted snow, his eyes as flame
― crüt, Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:24 (seven years ago)
The Ziegler thing is the closest so far to the "times were different then" defense I've been expecting. I just thought they were going to talk about the 1970s, not the year zero.
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:41 (seven years ago)
and lo, the angel of the Moore appeared to her
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:43 (seven years ago)
Moore! Moore! Moore!!
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:46 (seven years ago)
With a rebel yell
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:48 (seven years ago)
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:56 (seven years ago)
I'm hoping nat'l GOP dumps Moore and pushes Strange as a write-in candidate - depressing GOP turnout, splitting the vote and causing confusion, with Dougie squeaking in thx to energized Dem turnout
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 21:59 (seven years ago)
Seems likely. But then, I'm among those who thought "grab 'em by the" was pretty slam-dunk, and look where we are.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:02 (seven years ago)
xxpHow do you like it, how do you like it.
― nickn, Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:03 (seven years ago)
remember when howard dean needed to step down because he yelled, once?
― YouTube_-_funy_cats.flv (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:09 (seven years ago)
The hilarious thing is that the Dean Scream wasn't even bad!
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:19 (seven years ago)
Proves that being a total dork is still worse than any other offense
― Evan, Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:21 (seven years ago)
I remember at the time thinking "I believe the Internet is grossly overestimating Dean's support" and then he started underperformed in the Iowa caucuses, screamed in his speech, and everyone blamed his tanking support on the scream rather than considering it might not actually have been there in the first place.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:21 (seven years ago)
You rang?
http://dailycaller.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Dukakis-Tank-Ad-e1384898913712.jpg
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:22 (seven years ago)
(In fact, I remember linking an article a friend of mine wrote in 2003 about Dean's campaign that said basically said "dude's campaign is ignoring a large chunk of the Democratic base, I don't think this is going to work" and IIRC it got pooh-poohed pretty resoundingly.)
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:24 (seven years ago)
the fact that the speech is referred to as "I Have a Scream" is still hilarious
shame on him for referencing it during his DNC speech but not actually doing it
could've gotten Hillary over the top, who knows
― frogbs, Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:25 (seven years ago)
unpresidential: briefly yelping (in both senses of the term, probably), riding in a tank, fainting, riding in a swift boat of some kind, sighing loudly
presidential: being the R Kelly of Alabama politics in the '70s.
― omar little, Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:25 (seven years ago)
i'm jumping ahead here, assuming Roy Moore will be the GOP nominee in 2024
― omar little, Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:26 (seven years ago)
I guess we should be glad we didn't have Nate Silver around in '04 to say "Wait uh NO guys.." 700 times on Twitter
― frogbs, Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:26 (seven years ago)
at least Dean turned out to have an aptitide to be just another well-paid, undistinguished rotten lobbyist
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:27 (seven years ago)
he had one of the first high-profile lies about the Clinton compact with the DNC last week
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:28 (seven years ago)
will you please stop riding Hillary Clinton's dick for like two seconds
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:28 (seven years ago)
dean turned out to be disappointing but at the time he was still a great candidate.
― akm, Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:36 (seven years ago)
he feels like a precursor to Bernie, lone left-field New England liberal willing to say some hard truths that the base was clamoring for
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:37 (seven years ago)
I found him grossly uninformed in early 2004 but he read a few books and became the best party leader of my generation.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:40 (seven years ago)
yeah you can't knock his organizational skills
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:43 (seven years ago)
DNC could certainly use someone like him again. Maybe Obama can lead the DNC
― akm, Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:50 (seven years ago)
Obama didn't really seem to give much of a shit about the party while he was in office
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 22:57 (seven years ago)
Tally from my calls to Alabama GOP county chairs: 4 vehemently pro-Moore, 3 no comment/"haven't read the story yet," 15 I couldn't reach, 0 criticism of Moore.— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) November 9, 2017
― mookieproof, Thursday, 9 November 2017 23:00 (seven years ago)
quel surprise
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 23:00 (seven years ago)
what are they gonna do, just give up his seat? Local GOP ops know that if they turn on him now, they face a humiliating loss. They're holding out for a humiliating win!
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 23:01 (seven years ago)
Person close to WH tells me people there are waiting for President to be briefed in Beijing re: Moore, are not sure how he'll react— Robert Costa (@costareports) November 9, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 9 November 2017 23:12 (seven years ago)
I'm sure he will comport himself in a mature, thoughtful manner as befitting the president of the united states.
― bodak horseman (voodoo chili), Thursday, 9 November 2017 23:13 (seven years ago)
"Well, y'know when you're a Judge they let you do it"
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 23:14 (seven years ago)
dooo it
Thank you @SenShelby It's an honor to serve with you. pic.twitter.com/UiKL4mU833— Luther Strange (@lutherstrange) November 9, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 9 November 2017 23:33 (seven years ago)
There's something Strange going on tonight. Michael's nervous and the lights are bright.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 9 November 2017 23:36 (seven years ago)
I assume Trump is going to point out that he supported the other guy first.
― JoeStork, Thursday, 9 November 2017 23:44 (seven years ago)
I like my nation like I like my county fairs.
Full of unhealthy food, scary rides, and mutant produce. And run by frightening carnies.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 9 November 2017 23:46 (seven years ago)
I️ cut my campaign teeth (and actual teeth) in Alabama. Roy Moore has no path now based on his historic performance. I’ve only ever said that about Democrats in my home state.— Richard Allen Smith (@rockrichard) November 9, 2017
1) Moore is unpopular amongst REPUBLICANS in AL. Only wins with low t/o primary and then straight ticket voters in the GE.2) State GOP seem as corrupt regardless of party after Bentley/Hubbard/Moore/Strange all in past year3) special is 2wks b4 xmas— Richard Allen Smith (@rockrichard) November 9, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 9 November 2017 23:49 (seven years ago)
I wanna see some polling backing that up
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 9 November 2017 23:50 (seven years ago)
if turnout is the problem then you the polling may overestimate his support 🤞 but yeah it's a long shot
If you’re a GOP straight ticket voter, do you make an effort during the holidays to go vote for a candidate you hate from a party you feel is corrupt? Those voters are largely going to stay home.— Richard Allen Smith (@rockrichard) November 9, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 9 November 2017 23:51 (seven years ago)
That dude's twitter feed is intriguing, especially if (as someone else claims) local republicans are quietly rallying for Jones. I mean, weird things happen. But I dunno. Would impress me if Alabama went Dem over a corrupt religious nut who was just outed as a sexual predator.
Is it true that Birmingham has a lefty mayor?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 00:30 (seven years ago)
maybe even alabama is fed up with soft-on-russia republicans?
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 10 November 2017 00:39 (seven years ago)
Was it John Oliver who hilariously described Alabama as the South's "the South?"
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 00:49 (seven years ago)
I heard an interview with Moore when he was running for the primary. The (sympathetic) interviewer asked him his thoughts on DACA, and his reaction was basically "what the hell are you talking about?" He had no idea what DACA was (and this was peak DACA debate).
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 00:57 (seven years ago)
Asked by WVNN's radio host Dale Jackson about Trump's push to end DACA protection for so-called Dreamers, a confused Moore responded "Pardon? The Dreamer program?"JACKSON: "Yes, sir, the DACA/DAPA. You're not aware of what Dreamers are?"MOORE: "No."JACKSON: "This is a big issue in the immigration debate …"MOORE: "Why don't you tell me what it is Dale and quit beating around and tell me what it is."JACKSON: "I'm in the process of doing that Judge Moore."
JACKSON: "Yes, sir, the DACA/DAPA. You're not aware of what Dreamers are?"
MOORE: "No."
JACKSON: "This is a big issue in the immigration debate …"
MOORE: "Why don't you tell me what it is Dale and quit beating around and tell me what it is."
JACKSON: "I'm in the process of doing that Judge Moore."
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 00:58 (seven years ago)
There it is
After a long pause, Alabama Bibb County Republican chairman Jerry Pow tells me he'd vote for Roy Moore even if Moore did commit a sex crime against a girl. "I would vote for Judge Moore because I wouldn't want to vote for Doug," he says. "I'm not saying I support what he did."— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) November 9, 2017
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 01:10 (seven years ago)
There is literally no crime that supercedes tribal affiliation with these fuckers
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 01:11 (seven years ago)
better ped than red
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 10 November 2017 01:12 (seven years ago)
xp live boy/dead girl?
― sleeve, Friday, 10 November 2017 01:17 (seven years ago)
That should've been the reporter's follow-up question
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 01:19 (seven years ago)
Was it John Oliver who hilariously described Alabama as the South's "the South?"― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, November 9, 2017 7:49 PM
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, November 9, 2017 7:49 PM
lol this is otm
― crüt, Friday, 10 November 2017 01:24 (seven years ago)
Senate passes measure requiring sexual harassment training for senators, aides.
― grawlix (unperson), Friday, 10 November 2017 01:28 (seven years ago)
what does that make mississippi?
solid
― mookieproof, Friday, 10 November 2017 01:31 (seven years ago)
Well, at least he's consistent...
As a judge, Roy Moore cast the lone dissenting vote in an 8-1 decision essentially arguing against the legal premise of statutory rape. https://t.co/hWJIX0k9Fp— The Hoarse Whisperer (@HoarseWisperer) November 9, 2017
― Moodles, Friday, 10 November 2017 03:21 (seven years ago)
Ew
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 03:25 (seven years ago)
This is not my original thought but man Trump with 280 characters on Twitter is unreadable nonsense.
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 10 November 2017 15:05 (seven years ago)
How long until some sadist makes a Trump tweets daily desk calendar?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 15:06 (seven years ago)
yeah the 140 character trump tritter golden era is sadly over
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 10 November 2017 15:19 (seven years ago)
In other news, it seems for the first time the Mueller investigation is getting some leaks. Probably because it is less in fact gathering mode and more in 2nd-stage forward momentum mode. That story about Flynn allegedly planning an extraordinary rendition of that Turkish cleric? That's some fucked up, no doubt highly illegal shit. He's going to get charged with far worse than money laundering.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 15:22 (seven years ago)
I heard about that Flynn cleric thing like a week after he was canned
― President Keyes, Friday, 10 November 2017 15:29 (seven years ago)
the unequivocal defense of moore from a bunch of these alabama turds is something else
― marcos, Friday, 10 November 2017 15:42 (seven years ago)
pretty nuts
if by "something else" you mean totally consistent with the party who enthusiastically voted for "grab 'em by the pussy" then
― frogbs, Friday, 10 November 2017 15:46 (seven years ago)
The Gülen allegation isn’t new but the suggestion that Flynn would have been paid millions of Dollars for it is, I think.
― Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Friday, 10 November 2017 15:49 (seven years ago)
frogbs sadly otm
this is a crew who never, ever disowns their members. I mean, it's *still* called the Hastert Rule.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 16:26 (seven years ago)
lol @ Bannon's "the Bezos Amazon Post is making it personal and not political!" dude, you wrote the fucking guidebook on this.
― omar little, Friday, 10 November 2017 16:29 (seven years ago)
i do think that some of that right-wing idiocy is starting to increasingly wear on more swayable center-right types. i think Trump's problem the entire time he's been president has been the lack of an unlikable opponent, which is why they keep bringing up Hillary over and over. let's play our greatest hit one more time!
― omar little, Friday, 10 November 2017 16:32 (seven years ago)
totally agree
― sleeve, Friday, 10 November 2017 16:34 (seven years ago)
regarding Flynn, yeah it was reported or leaked about the cleric, but I'm not sure it was reported that he was literally going to kidnap him and take him to Turkey.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 16:36 (seven years ago)
for money.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 16:37 (seven years ago)
our local newspaper does a lot of Trump stories and there's usually someone there to comment "typical biased BS, how come you never talk about Hillary?"
― frogbs, Friday, 10 November 2017 16:42 (seven years ago)
total head in sand assholes.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 16:44 (seven years ago)
If "Trying to fix the Miss Universe pageant" is the thing that brings Trump down I'm going to leap into the sun. Not that any of his base cares about this.
(THREAD) BREAKING: According to an individual with firsthand knowledge of the judging of the 2002 Miss Universe pageant, Trump tried to rig the outcome of the international contest to award the prestigious “Miss Universe” title to Vladimir Putin’s then-mistress, Oxana Fedorova. pic.twitter.com/1mPjdL4Omj— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) November 10, 2017
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Friday, 10 November 2017 16:53 (seven years ago)
which is why they keep bringing up Hillary over and over. let's play our greatest hit one more time!
lol will we still be hearing about hillary in a year, two years, three years? there has to be diminishing returns but i think we will be hearing about her forever
― marcos, Friday, 10 November 2017 16:53 (seven years ago)
Uh yeah the crookedness of Hillary will last forever
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Friday, 10 November 2017 16:54 (seven years ago)
the clintons are the right’s emmanuel goldstein, we’ll be hearing about them (and soros) for as long as they’re useful targets
― drinkmaster sealcup at yr service (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 10 November 2017 16:57 (seven years ago)
if we could harness Clinton-generated outrage as an energy source, we could swear off of fossil fuels within 18 months
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Friday, 10 November 2017 16:58 (seven years ago)
perpetual idiopathic scoliosis
― Evan, Friday, 10 November 2017 17:00 (seven years ago)
will it be 280 character twitter that finally brings trump down?
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 10 November 2017 17:02 (seven years ago)
tweeting 'on narrative'
― j., Friday, 10 November 2017 17:18 (seven years ago)
Jack Posobiec (who is verified on Twitter) is now posting pics and the workplace of at least one of the Roy Moore accusers
― frogbs, Friday, 10 November 2017 17:31 (seven years ago)
jfc
― sleeve, Friday, 10 November 2017 17:32 (seven years ago)
Hi it's me, the serious op-ed columnist, who cannot tell the difference between the populism that's racist and the one that wants to make healthcare a right. I write the same 3 columns over and over again and am paid .5 million a year plus speaking fees.— Luke Savage (@LukewSavage) November 10, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Friday, 10 November 2017 17:45 (seven years ago)
The right is still mad at those dirty hippies who wouldn't let us just do our job in Vietnam.
― louise ck (milo z), Friday, 10 November 2017 18:00 (seven years ago)
I donated to Doug Jones just yesterday and have already received two emails asking for money.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 18:09 (seven years ago)
xpI still see the occasional "Hanoi Jane" reference on facebook.
― nickn, Friday, 10 November 2017 18:11 (seven years ago)
so are RussiaRussiaRussia libs gonna applaud the administration for this?
Washington will apply its Foreign Agents Registration Act to RT America, the channel has announced. The Department of Justice has given the broadcaster until Monday to register as a foreign agent, otherwise the channel’s head faces arrest and its accounts could be frozen.
The piece of legislation was adopted in the US in 1938 to counter pro-Nazi agitation on US soil. Washington has made the decision to apply the act towards the company that supplies all services for RT America on its territory, including TV production and operations. Just over 400 entities are currently registered under the legislation, but it does not include a single media outlet.
https://www.rt.com/news/409349-rt-foreign-agent-doj/
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 November 2017 18:13 (seven years ago)
Aaaand the follow up:
Hi it's me, the bernie supporter that voted for trump who cannot tell the difference between the populism that's racist and the one that wants to make healthcare a right. I infiltrate leftist communities and convince them daddy trump is right.— betakillers (@betakillers) November 10, 2017
What a lonely life you must lead— Luke Savage (@LukewSavage) November 10, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Friday, 10 November 2017 18:17 (seven years ago)
i don't understand any of that
― akm, Friday, 10 November 2017 18:22 (seven years ago)
donated to Doug Jones just yesterday and have already received two emails asking for money.
A bane of modern life, for sure. If I were smart I'd segregate all such twaddle into a gmail set up solely for that purpose, but alas I am not that smart.
― A is for (Aimless), Friday, 10 November 2017 18:24 (seven years ago)
This is good
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Friday, 10 November 2017 18:40 (seven years ago)
poor Joseph was cucked by God! https://t.co/SjnbFZ293I— Doug Henwood (@DougHenwood) November 9, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 November 2017 18:46 (seven years ago)
i would be so happy to never see that stupid fucking word again
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 10 November 2017 18:48 (seven years ago)
The NRSC has stopped fundraising for Moore.
― grawlix (unperson), Friday, 10 November 2017 18:49 (seven years ago)
Wow, that's cold.
My occasional take-the-temperature-of-the-dextrosphere reading yesterday was all "this is a political hit job" and "he-said/she-said" and "everything in the WaPo is lies" and, of course, the venerable "I question the timing."
Red-hatters have been quick to point the finger not just at libs/media but also at RINO cuck GOPe establishment NeverTrump swamp squishes - chiefly McConnell, Ryan, and McCain - who fear Moore and want to keep him out of power.
This appears to be a front in the GOP civil war, almost as much as it is a front in the overall blue/red tribal conflict.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 10 November 2017 19:01 (seven years ago)
xp finally some good news re: this scumbag
― sleeve, Friday, 10 November 2017 19:02 (seven years ago)
GOP in-fighting is good for this race and as such I encourage it. If he faces some difficulty fundraising in the home stretch that's awesome (hope Dougie gets a similar bump) - altho idk if fundraising is really going to be the deciding factor in this race. Dougie seems to be doing allright, Moore seems to be barely campaigning - refusing to debate, letting Dougie air ads uncontested etc. This is gonna come down to a) depressing the GOP turnout and b) maximizing the Dem turnout, esp among black women.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 19:06 (seven years ago)
tin hat types think the Moore story originated with McConnell.just got my third ask for Doug money in 24 hours.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 19:07 (seven years ago)
McConnell's playing 5D chess - if they lose the Senate they can't be blamed for not doing anything and can comfortably occupy the obstruct everything space that has been so lucrative.
― louise ck (milo z), Friday, 10 November 2017 19:11 (seven years ago)
well, the tin hats think he wants strange as a write in.how long until locking up Hillary is a ballot initiative?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 19:28 (seven years ago)
the flynn stuff laid out
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/mueller-probing-possible-deal-between-turks-flynn-during-presidential-transition-n819616
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 10 November 2017 19:30 (seven years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOOamJwXkAUs54b.jpg
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Friday, 10 November 2017 19:32 (seven years ago)
If it weren't for the Bill of Attainder language in the constitution, I'm sure some gink in the House would have already introduced a Jail Hillary bill by now.
― A is for (Aimless), Friday, 10 November 2017 19:32 (seven years ago)
see, that Flynn stuff is flat out treason, isn't it?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 19:32 (seven years ago)
Still not a tenth of Hillary’s crimes though
― frogbs, Friday, 10 November 2017 19:33 (seven years ago)
well, yeah.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 19:34 (seven years ago)
that's why Flynn wanted to lock her up.
Rudy Giuliani, who was a top Trump campaign surrogate alongside Flynn, is part of Zarrab's defense team. The New York Times reported that Giuliani met with Erdoğan in late February and discussed an agreement under which Zarrab would be freed in exchange for Turkey's help furthering U.S. interests in the region.
um
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Friday, 10 November 2017 19:38 (seven years ago)
turkey's mayor
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 10 November 2017 19:39 (seven years ago)
in other news, read that 140000 Puerto Ricans have moved to FL since Maria. could tip some close races ...
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 19:40 (seven years ago)
lol caek
― marcos, Friday, 10 November 2017 19:55 (seven years ago)
I do not think this is a good idea
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/10/joe-biden-2020-trump-244757
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:19 (seven years ago)
the bottomless egos of septuagenarian corporate Dems
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:20 (seven years ago)
ban septuagenarians from electoral politics
― marcos, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:21 (seven years ago)
fuck that
― sleeve, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:21 (seven years ago)
marcos otm
― sleeve, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:22 (seven years ago)
http://www.businessinsider.com/devin-nunes-michael-flynn-turkey-russia-2017-11
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:22 (seven years ago)
I do kinda feel that way! I know a few 80yo and I don't really want them running the country either, no matter how cool they are. And I have a lot of issues with Biden's past positions, judgment etc. which just compounds it. He gives good speeches nowadays, why doesn't he just stick to that.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:22 (seven years ago)
Vs Trump? I mean, I think he could win, but I don't know if that makes it a good idea. Right now they are cultivating plenty of potential candidates, but I don't know how many of them are household names yet.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:22 (seven years ago)
The thing is, they do this because ... it works. And I want them to have the money. So I just grit my teeth and accept it (and use a non-primary gmail address for campaign contributions.)
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:24 (seven years ago)
Basically, considering people like Biden for '20 is illustrative of a little Dem Voice in the Head: "We're gonna blow it again." And who can dismiss that?
(the funny part is that they consider picking a famous vet as a safe move rather than inviting a rerun of The Most Experienced Candidate Ever)
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:27 (seven years ago)
I wish there were a way to donate to Doug Jones so that I get the money.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:27 (seven years ago)
Biden is a terrible idea and no one takes it seriously
― Randall Jarrell (dandydonweiner), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:27 (seven years ago)
Lol @ Biden having any chance whatsoever of getting past the first couple rounds of primaries if he was running against anyone other than maybe CuomoBut hey it’s an excuse to wail about how much we hate our own party so sure why not
― El Tomboto, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:28 (seven years ago)
good lord do we have to resurrect his pervy pictures and statements in the current environment?
― Randall Jarrell (dandydonweiner), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:29 (seven years ago)
didn't say anything about DSA :)
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:29 (seven years ago)
xpost It's fine, I want them to have money. But I literally just gave them money, and when I get several asks right after I feel like my first donation has not even been acknowledged. (Look what happened to Move On, from a progressive prime mover to a spam generator.) Like, the Jones campaign just sent me an email that asked me to take a survey, but it was a stealth ask for more money that concluded with only two options: donate $5, or donate more. So I wasted my time filling out the survey, thinking I was helping with something, and ended feeling like they were trying to scam me.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:29 (seven years ago)
I think it would be reasonable for any of the following Democrats to run for President:
Cory BookerKamala HarrisTim KaineJulian CastroAmy KlobucharDeval PatrickTammy DuckworthTom PerezKeith EllisonDonna Brazile oops, sorryKirsten Gillibrand
This is by no means an exhaustive list.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:31 (seven years ago)
but but but Booker's BIG PHARMA TIES
― Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:33 (seven years ago)
I've argued Gilibrand for awhile, she's definitely got friends in the right places. I don't see Booker making it. Kamala Harris seems to have loads of fans.
Tim Kaine loves the Replacements, he gets my vote.
― Randall Jarrell (dandydonweiner), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:33 (seven years ago)
I really want it to be Tammy Duckworth
― .oO (silby), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:34 (seven years ago)
Al Franken
― frogbs, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:34 (seven years ago)
I'm Team Kamala at the moment but am fine w most of those (Booker is an exception, that guy is irritating; Kaine is a charisma vacuum). Tammy would be my second pick. also lol @ leaving out Elizabeth Warren.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:34 (seven years ago)
Mario Cuomo
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:34 (seven years ago)
xpost Well that's part of the problem, isn't it? It'll be a campaign of attrition, a la Trump's, but unlike the GOP the Dems will end totally divided on the final choice after viciously burning through so many favorites.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:35 (seven years ago)
would absolutely *love* to vote for Al Franken but idk his appeal seems... limited
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:35 (seven years ago)
but unlike the GOP the Dems will end totally divided on the final choice after viciously burning through so many favorites.
somehow I don't think the Dem primary will be anywhere near as vicious as the '16 GOP primaries
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:36 (seven years ago)
Tell it to Bernie fans.
Of those I would love a president Duckworth or Gillibrand, as long as their seats remain blue.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:36 (seven years ago)
I mean, the Donna Brazile bs ... it's been a year and people are still pissed or making new enemies or settling scores.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:37 (seven years ago)
I left out Warren and Franken because if one of the things we dislike about Trump is his age and one of the things we complain about in the Democrats is propping up elders and not cultivating younger candidates for the Presidency, we should probably not put people in their mid-to-late 60s on the shortlist.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:37 (seven years ago)
Trump's age is probably the least bad thing about him.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:38 (seven years ago)
" ... *and* he's old!"
i would quit my job in a heartbeat to work for some combo of Booker/Franken/Harris
― Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:39 (seven years ago)
Franken gave a fairly clear answer about 2020 a few weeks ago. Not some dodgy "I'm focused on the people in Minnesota" thing, but a carved in stone "no."
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:40 (seven years ago)
I like the idea of having any and all of those people considered. And some we haven't mentioned or don't even know about yet. We could have one of those, whadyacallem, "primary election" thingies to find out who's the best pick. Not interested in ruling anyone out at this time due to some purity issue or other.
But yeah, Biden can go away.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:40 (seven years ago)
I routinely forget Kaine exists until someone else brings him up and I suspect I am far from alone in this
― Simon H., Friday, 10 November 2017 20:41 (seven years ago)
his appeal seems... limited
not as limited as keith ellison's, i suspect
― mookieproof, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:41 (seven years ago)
i want a booker-cuomo ticket just to see how bitter morbz gets
― marcos, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:41 (seven years ago)
Gabbard, O'Malley
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:42 (seven years ago)
― Simon H., Friday, November 10, 2017
There was a story about his wife looking around the house and noticing Tim had been sitting in the den reading the paper since 2002.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:43 (seven years ago)
Booker is a literal con man, as p4reene has written, so yeah i figure he'll win
uh given the last week's events you guys might want to consider the possible costs of nominating a comedy writer from the '70s
Kaine is a fucking invertebrate
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:44 (seven years ago)
Kaine over O'Malley on a list is rude
― mh, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:44 (seven years ago)
otm imo
― sleeve, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:45 (seven years ago)
Kaine is family friends with one of my college friends, who is a black linguist who specializes in teaching AAVE. She talks about him a LOT.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:46 (seven years ago)
Fuck Tulsi Gabbard. If she gets anywhere near sniffing the nomination, and no one ousts Trump on the other side, and the general is between the two of them, I'd consider suicide.
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:46 (seven years ago)
huh yeah I figured Franken probably wouldn't want to do it, but a man can dream
― frogbs, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:46 (seven years ago)
every time Booker opens his mouth I feel like shouting MENDACITY like a Tennessee Williams character. But the last year has been so horrid that I'll take Tim Fucking Kaine even if we have to stick him in a wheelchair, give him a cigarette holder, and call him Franklin.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:46 (seven years ago)
xxp wait what's your beef there? genuinely curious.
― sleeve, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:46 (seven years ago)
Whole list is questionable, nothing but pols with suspicious links to the Democratic party.
― Moodles, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:47 (seven years ago)
As loathe as I am to link to anything at Paste, this is the best summary of Tulsi Gabbard's bullshit.
https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2016/11/tulsi-gabbard-is-not-who-you-think-she-is.html
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:48 (seven years ago)
yea that lists mostly sucks and a lot of them would lose to trump imo
― marcos, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:51 (seven years ago)
god I don't want to imagine Trump coming up with a "funny" nickname for her
― frogbs, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:53 (seven years ago)
I don't think Warren could beat Trump
― Randall Jarrell (dandydonweiner), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:53 (seven years ago)
me neither
― marcos, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:55 (seven years ago)
the thing w/Trump is that he won a few states in 2016 i can see him easily losing in 2020. not sure if his shit will play well a second time especially after three more years of him (oh god), plus he won't have Hillary to kick around anymore.
― omar little, Friday, 10 November 2017 20:56 (seven years ago)
I think Harris and Gillibrand seem most likely to go the distance, and the only time I've predicted wrong since I've been of voting age was when Howard Dean's weird vocalization essentially ended his campaign.
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:57 (seven years ago)
I disagree tbh xxp
― Simon H., Friday, 10 November 2017 20:57 (seven years ago)
Yes but he's spinning the Mats in the background for relevance.
He cannot win and won't run.
― Randall Jarrell (dandydonweiner), Friday, 10 November 2017 20:59 (seven years ago)
Harris or Gilebrand
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Friday, 10 November 2017 21:01 (seven years ago)
i don't really know anything about her or her politics but i kind of have a crush on klobuchar
― mookieproof, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:03 (seven years ago)
Adam Schiff should be on the list.
― nickn, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:13 (seven years ago)
Man, how many actors and TV personalities are the dems going to have to lose to before they realize that charisma and physical attractiveness matter more than almost anything?
― Dan I., Friday, 10 November 2017 21:16 (seven years ago)
That reminds me of when Lawrence O'Donnell was so absolutely certain Tim Pawlenty had the clearest path to the GOP nomination, and I was like "whuuuuuut?"
Adam Schiff is a Tim Pawlenty.
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Friday, 10 November 2017 21:17 (seven years ago)
Dickhead Maine Gov - can he just refuse to implement what the people voted on? Can he pull a McConnell and just say nah? That seems even more ... illegal? Contempt of voter?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:18 (seven years ago)
Dan I sadly otm
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:18 (seven years ago)
― omar little,
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 10 November 2017 21:18 (seven years ago)
charisma and physical attractiveness matter more than almost anything?
this must be why Sanders is so popular
― Simon H., Friday, 10 November 2017 21:18 (seven years ago)
Dickhead Maine Gov - can he just refuse to implement what the people voted on?
short answer is "no". State Constitution is very clear that if he tries this he is breaking the law.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:19 (seven years ago)
I just, that moment when clinton and kaine were first onstage together at the convention, there was such a void there. I just kept thinking about Dukakis
― Dan I., Friday, 10 November 2017 21:19 (seven years ago)
he didn't win fyi
plus he won't have Hillary to kick around anymore
are you sure
― mookieproof, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:19 (seven years ago)
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/270/034/ded.jpg
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Friday, 10 November 2017 21:20 (seven years ago)
What if he pulls a "so?" Will he be arrested?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:20 (seven years ago)
he's big, he's loud, and you'd heard of him.
― Dan I., Friday, 10 November 2017 21:20 (seven years ago)
only pointing out that the qualities you highlight aren't necessarily prerequisites to popularity
― Simon H., Friday, 10 November 2017 21:21 (seven years ago)
he will be sued
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:21 (seven years ago)
"he's big, he's loud, and you'd heard of him" != "charismatic and physically attractive"
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Friday, 10 November 2017 21:22 (seven years ago)
Sanders does have a weird kind of charisma tbh, it works on people predisposed to liking cranky old guys. But it wasn't enough to carry him over.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:22 (seven years ago)
Pierce calls him "the human bowling jacket"
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 10 November 2017 21:23 (seven years ago)
actually I think "big loud and you'd heard of him" *does* qualify as charismatic and physically attractive for wide swathes of people.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:23 (seven years ago)
For Godzilla.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:24 (seven years ago)
for the republican base that sure as fuck is exactly what charisma means!
― Dan I., Friday, 10 November 2017 21:24 (seven years ago)
omg djp his panty lines
― Randall Jarrell (dandydonweiner), Friday, 10 November 2017 21:25 (seven years ago)
Moore officially denying story, but you know what they say: he who denied it ...
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:25 (seven years ago)
In a picture full of upsetting things, the panty lines are probably the most upsetting to me
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Friday, 10 November 2017 21:26 (seven years ago)
I mean, you don't have to be a tall, handsome motherfucker like Obama or young Clinton, but you got to have some kind of iconic frission that, like, Kaine and Klobuchar just do not have at all
― Dan I., Friday, 10 November 2017 21:26 (seven years ago)
let us marvel at Trump's pressed hams
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:26 (seven years ago)
You know Moore totally did it, because he waited so long to officially deny it. They had to have a meeting and decide which way to go: drop out or lie? Lie.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:26 (seven years ago)
it works on people predisposed to liking cranky old guys. But it wasn't enough to carry him over.
not trying to relitigate anything, I'm more interested in his current popularity. it's been over a year now folks
― Simon H., Friday, 10 November 2017 21:26 (seven years ago)
You know Moore totally did it, because he waited so long to officially deny it.
? his campaign denied it immediately.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:27 (seven years ago)
seriously dan I mean it's just so unflattering to know he wears granny panties
― Randall Jarrell (dandydonweiner), Friday, 10 November 2017 21:27 (seven years ago)
three runner up faves:
https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--NK_NyQbA--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/te4saskbu74vgbsloyxf.jpg
https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--HwCahm9U--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/m6fbsf2fdjs8dwqozbna.jpg
https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--IvwRtcug--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/cnvixhpl9xsdgadltmwv.jpg
― omar little, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:28 (seven years ago)
how do we turn off images on ilx again?
― Dan I., Friday, 10 November 2017 21:29 (seven years ago)
your mistake was ever turning them on
― Simon H., Friday, 10 November 2017 21:30 (seven years ago)
― Οὖτις, Friday, November 10, 2017 4:27 PM
The campaign knew it was coming and gave Breitbart the pre-break denial, but Moore himself hasn't been heard from until this afternoon when he called into Hannity's radio show.
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Friday, 10 November 2017 21:30 (seven years ago)
Franken would play better as a veep, able to snark from the sidelines like a cannier Biden
― shackling the masses with plastic-wrapped snack picks (sic), Friday, 10 November 2017 21:31 (seven years ago)
I'm sure having a "Franken" on a ticket definitely won't result in a million painful puns
― Simon H., Friday, 10 November 2017 21:33 (seven years ago)
remember that brief, wonderful window when we could put images in our display names? be glad we no longer live in those times
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Friday, 10 November 2017 21:34 (seven years ago)
Every time Garrison draws his blonde Adonis Trump, all I can picture is these tennis pics.
― the young, low level volunteer named (Dan Peterson), Friday, 10 November 2017 21:38 (seven years ago)
I really though last year had cured us (me included) of "what I think will happen"
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 November 2017 21:39 (seven years ago)
speaking of monsters that refuse to go away
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/10/mitt-romney-senate-utah-244760?lo=ap_d1
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:41 (seven years ago)
i had no idea these tennis pictures existed nor his granny panties but am not surprised
― Randall Jarrell (dandydonweiner), Friday, 10 November 2017 21:44 (seven years ago)
moore was tweeting denials last night, they were the headline story on fox news
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:46 (seven years ago)
HANNITY: Do you remember dating girls that young?MOORE: "Not generally, no"— Allan Smith (@akarl_smith) November 10, 2017
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Friday, 10 November 2017 21:47 (seven years ago)
ouchby the way, those tennis pictures were back when Trump was in fighting shape. He has blimped up since then.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 21:53 (seven years ago)
mitt romney in the senate next year is a good thing. it's not going to be a democrat so it may as well be a prideful old money guy who thinks trump is vulgar and will occasionally vote against confirming lunatics to the executive branch as a member of foreign relations.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 10 November 2017 22:06 (seven years ago)
Not just that, but Romney is already a Trump opponent. So he would enter the Senate an adversary.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 22:08 (seven years ago)
well, in the sense he'll vote with him 90% of the time instead of 100%
but he's just the kind of vain "centrist" you want kicking around if there's ever impeachment
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 10 November 2017 22:11 (seven years ago)
Roy Moore: "I'm sure in the next four weeks they're gonna come out with another article."— andrew kaczynski🤔 (@KFILE) November 10, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 10 November 2017 22:25 (seven years ago)
sure, why not?
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 10 November 2017 22:32 (seven years ago)
I didn't do it, but if I did it it was totally okay. And that's why I kept doing it. As you will soon hear. But I didn't do it.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 22:34 (seven years ago)
yeah this seems likely, Romney would love to position himself as the upstanding moral center/savior of the party.
I still don't like him.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 22:35 (seven years ago)
Romney is a sycophantic microbe who groveled for secretary of state and was rightfully humiliated.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 10 November 2017 22:37 (seven years ago)
we should pull out the flow chart detailing the number of positions from which Romney has backed away since leaving the governorship.
Statement from Mike Flynn’s lawyer about today’s news pic.twitter.com/D72RRjkIJn— Matthew Rosenberg (@AllMattNYT) November 10, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 10 November 2017 22:42 (seven years ago)
the harshest era of ilx
― she carries a torch. two torches, actually (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Friday, 10 November 2017 22:51 (seven years ago)
noted elsewhere that statement by lawyers allows flynn to avoid personal culpability for lying.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 23:01 (seven years ago)
Having read the detailed description of the incidents, as well as the response from Judge Moore and his campaign, I can no longer endorse his candidacy for the US Senate.— Mike Lee (@SenMikeLee) November 10, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 10 November 2017 23:04 (seven years ago)
I️ honestly think that’s the tipping point.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 10 November 2017 23:05 (seven years ago)
sounds like moore's interview with hard hitter hannity didn't go well
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 10 November 2017 23:05 (seven years ago)
I am pulling my endorsement and support for Roy Moore for U.S. Senate.— Steve Daines (@SteveDaines) November 10, 2017
here we go
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 10 November 2017 23:06 (seven years ago)
Moore and the Alabama GOP have repeatedly told the nat'l GOP to literally go fuck themselves, they're just going to double-down on that now
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 23:09 (seven years ago)
good fucking riddance (P.S. I am drunk posting right now, RIP Fred Cole)
― sleeve, Friday, 10 November 2017 23:11 (seven years ago)
When pressed by Hannity, Moore said that he knew several of the other women who spoke to The Washington Post, which published the allegations Thursday, but did not "remember going out on dates." He admitted taking "young girls" out after returning to America following his service in Vietnam, but denied serving Gloria Thacker Deason, one of the accusers, rose wine, saying that any date would have happened in a dry county.
"She said she believed she was underaged," said Moore. "As I recall she was 19 or older. I never provided intoxicating liquor to a minor. I seem to remember her as a good girl."
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 23:11 (seven years ago)
completely denies ever knowing Corfman etc. (of course)
baaaarf
Democrats familiar with the campaign of their nominee, Doug Jones, said no new ad buys or investments were planned to take advantage of the story.
this is smart. stay out of the way.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 23:12 (seven years ago)
i think one of the miscalculations of 2016 was trying to hammer home the obvious regarding Trump, which just stirred up a lot of unnecessary shit.
― omar little, Friday, 10 November 2017 23:17 (seven years ago)
Doug Jones isn't just the best Dem candidate in Alabama politics in a very long time, he is a legitimately decent man. I'd have been surprised to see him jump on this, tbh.
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Friday, 10 November 2017 23:23 (seven years ago)
Assuming he stays in the race and wins, what then? This psycho sex offender is elected to Senate and just hangs out there with people who hate him? Or does he become The New Normal.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 November 2017 23:31 (seven years ago)
does he just become the Steve King of the Senate?
he becomes the new Ted Cruz of the Senate
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 23:41 (seven years ago)
the Lyin' Of The Senate, as I believe he's known
― Doctor Casino, Friday, 10 November 2017 23:42 (seven years ago)
John Lewis campaigning w Dougie in Mobile at the moment apparently
― Οὖτις, Friday, 10 November 2017 23:48 (seven years ago)
The whole ‘dry county’ defense is completely bogus. I heard it last night too.
― brotherlovesdub, Friday, 10 November 2017 23:55 (seven years ago)
https://newrepublic.com/article/145775/evangelicals-cant-quit-roy-moore
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Saturday, 11 November 2017 00:51 (seven years ago)
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/10/us/politics/roy-moore-alabama-republican.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=0
Republican senators and their advisers, in a flurry of phone calls, emails and text messages, discussed fielding a write-in candidate, pushing Alabama’s governor to delay the Dec. 12 special election or even not seating Mr. Moore at all should he be elected. In an interview, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, declined to say whether he would agree to seat Mr. Moore should he win. Mr. McConnell deferred a question about a possible write-in campaign by Senator Luther Strange, the current occupant of the seat, to Mr. Strange.
State law gives the governor broad authority to set the date of special elections, and Ms. Ivey, who is a Republican, already rescheduled the Senate election once, after inheriting the governor’s office in April when her predecessor, Robert Bentley, resigned in a sex and corruption scandal. Ms. Ivey’s advisers have not ruled out exercising that power again, according to Republicans in touch with her camp, but she has signaled that she would like reassurances of support from the White House before taking such an aggressive step.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 11 November 2017 01:25 (seven years ago)
oh dear
― sleeve, Saturday, 11 November 2017 01:28 (seven years ago)
Wtf
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 11 November 2017 01:43 (seven years ago)
From what I understand about Alabama politics, there's a sore loser law...which means that neither Luther Strange nor Mo Brooks could be installed in place of Moore since they already lost in the primary. I guess either of them could mount a write-in campaign as an independent, but I haven't heard any rumbling about that happening.
If Ivey postpones the election, Moore supporters will lose their shit, Jones supporters will lose their shit, and everybody in the middle will just say fucking hell, Alabama!
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Saturday, 11 November 2017 01:48 (seven years ago)
What are they promising to give Ivey in exchange for immolating her political career in Alabama?
― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 11 November 2017 01:49 (seven years ago)
― Dan I., Friday, 10 November 2017 21:20 (yesterday) Permalink
Tad Doyle 2020
― Universal LULU Nation (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Saturday, 11 November 2017 01:54 (seven years ago)
What grounds would Ivey even have for making such a move, "cant have election now cuz GOP might lose" sounds flagrantly illegal as a rationale, surely that would trigger legal challenges from both sides.
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 11 November 2017 02:24 (seven years ago)
If McConnell could successfully keep a very qualified Supreme Court justice from being appointed, surely he can keep a toxic lunatic out of the Senate.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 11 November 2017 02:27 (seven years ago)
she doesn't need grounds, just the legal authority. there are no longer any 'norms'
― mookieproof, Saturday, 11 November 2017 02:29 (seven years ago)
New poll shows Moore and Dougie tied
https://decisiondeskhq.com/news/opinion-savvyddhq-alsen-poll-roy-moore-46-4-doug-jones-46/
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 11 November 2017 02:40 (seven years ago)
I'd need to see some legal analysis before i accept that explanation. The governor is not a dictator.
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 11 November 2017 02:41 (seven years ago)
what's weird about that poll to me is "82.2% were aware of the allegations" in a poll conducted the same day (iirc) they were published.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 11 November 2017 02:41 (seven years ago)
What did you say about the Maine gov? That they could sue her? I'm sure she'd be quaking in her Alabama boots.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 11 November 2017 02:43 (seven years ago)
Alabama exists to keep minorities out of power don’t put anything past Alabama
― YouTube_-_funy_cats.flv (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Saturday, 11 November 2017 02:47 (seven years ago)
Lawsuits delay things and sometimes place limits on power
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 11 November 2017 02:54 (seven years ago)
LePage doesnt have a legal leg to stand on fwiw
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 11 November 2017 02:55 (seven years ago)
I don't think those words hold weight anymore. How did McConnell keep the SC seat vacant? How has Trump gotten away with all sorts of shit? If no one enforces the laws the laws are useless.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 11 November 2017 02:57 (seven years ago)
That Moore, a despicable human being by any standard, has made it this far, after failing at all sorts of shit in the past, and if molesting a teenage girl perhaps almost *ties* the race (assuming that is accurate), that just shows how far everything has shifted from "normal."
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 11 November 2017 02:58 (seven years ago)
yes
― Dan S, Saturday, 11 November 2017 03:05 (seven years ago)
related:
Trump judge nominee, 36, who has never tried a case, wins approval of Senate panel
― sleeve, Saturday, 11 November 2017 03:29 (seven years ago)
Bringing up a lot of irrelevant stuff imo
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 11 November 2017 03:32 (seven years ago)
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/10/sean-spicer-gq-magazine-story-fallout-244784
The directive to RNC employees to steer clear of floor five was given out of an abundance of caution, according to an RNC employee, to avoid violating a decades-old court order, known as a consent decree. It barred the RNC from challenging voters' eligibility at the polls after the party was accused in the 1980s of practices meant to discourage African-Americans from voting. The consent decree is set to expire next month, barring proof of any violations.The anxious reactions to Spicer's comment demonstrate how haunted the GOP is by the consent decree — a remnant of a racially charged incident that some party leaders have been longing to leave behind. The party has been vigilant for the past year or more about avoiding even the appearance of flouting the court order.
The anxious reactions to Spicer's comment demonstrate how haunted the GOP is by the consent decree — a remnant of a racially charged incident that some party leaders have been longing to leave behind. The party has been vigilant for the past year or more about avoiding even the appearance of flouting the court order.
― j., Saturday, 11 November 2017 03:48 (seven years ago)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/11/10/at-the-end-of-the-day-perhaps-typography-will-be-trumps-downfall/?tid=hybrid_experimentrandom_with_top_mostshared_3_na
proven with science
― j., Saturday, 11 November 2017 04:25 (seven years ago)
The whole GOP loves Milkshake racist, the racist senate candidate who also loves milkshakes. *5 seconds later* we regret to inform you the racist is also a pedophile.*5 seconds later* The whole GOP loves Pedophile racist— Julius Goat 🦆 (@JuliusGoat) November 10, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Saturday, 11 November 2017 06:06 (seven years ago)
“Sen. Heitkamp introduces bill to address 'epidemic' of missing and murdered Native women”
https://www.indianz.com/News/2017/10/05/sen-heitkamp-pushes-bill-to-address-cris.asp
(From October)
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Saturday, 11 November 2017 06:09 (seven years ago)
The statement likely didn’t do his embattled candidacy any favors—even though Moore did deny having been involved with a 14-year-old. And it turns out he couldn’t deny relations with underage women in a phone call with a US senator after the show.According to three sources briefed on the call, Moore could not deny “kissing” or “dating” teenagers while in his thirties. The Republican senator encouraged Moore to drop out of the race, the sources said. A spokesman for Moore declined to comment on an account of the phone call.
According to three sources briefed on the call, Moore could not deny “kissing” or “dating” teenagers while in his thirties. The Republican senator encouraged Moore to drop out of the race, the sources said. A spokesman for Moore declined to comment on an account of the phone call.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 11 November 2017 06:16 (seven years ago)
https://www.washingtonian.com/2017/11/11/in-call-with-us-lawmaker-roy-moore-doesnt-deny-kissing-teenagers-as-30-year-old/
"dating"
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 11 November 2017 13:56 (seven years ago)
The Gateway Pundit is breaking the story that one of the accusers is a multiple divorcee with a history of bankruptcy filings.
― JoeStork, Saturday, 11 November 2017 16:06 (seven years ago)
Like Trump?
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Saturday, 11 November 2017 16:10 (seven years ago)
"The Gateway Pundit is breaking the story that one of the accusers is a multiple divorcee with a history of bankruptcy filings."
what a whore! let's run her out of town
― akm, Saturday, 11 November 2017 16:13 (seven years ago)
No, not at all, totally different. The next headline is "China Visit: Trump Praised as 'UNCLE TRUMP'"
― JoeStork, Saturday, 11 November 2017 16:16 (seven years ago)
lemon squeezy easy peasy
― reggie (qualmsley), Saturday, 11 November 2017 17:20 (seven years ago)
what a revelation! a woman abused as a young teen has trouble with her relationships with men in later life. stop the presses!
― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 11 November 2017 18:55 (seven years ago)
missed this NYT story yesterday:
WASHINGTON — Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, acknowledged on Friday that the Republican tax plan might result in a tax hike for some working Americans, saying he “misspoke” days earlier when he said that “nobody in the middle class is going to get a tax increase” under the Senate bill.“I misspoke on that,” Mr. McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, said in an interview on Friday with The New York Times. “You can’t guarantee that absolutely no one sees a tax increase, but what we are doing is targeting levels of income and looking at the average in those levels and the average will be tax relief for the average taxpayer in each of those segments.”
“I misspoke on that,” Mr. McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, said in an interview on Friday with The New York Times. “You can’t guarantee that absolutely no one sees a tax increase, but what we are doing is targeting levels of income and looking at the average in those levels and the average will be tax relief for the average taxpayer in each of those segments.”
such inspiring rhetoric! sure to mobilize support for the plan.
― Doctor Casino, Saturday, 11 November 2017 20:26 (seven years ago)
Getting a little worried they'll actually delay the AL election.
― JoeStork, Saturday, 11 November 2017 20:39 (seven years ago)
From a spokesman for Alabama's governor: "Governor Ivey is not considering and has no plans to move the special election for U.S. Senate."— Alan Blinder (@alanblinder) November 11, 2017
This probably means that they still think they can win
― bodak horseman (voodoo chili), Saturday, 11 November 2017 20:58 (seven years ago)
It probably means that she's aware that doing so would likely end her career and embroil the state in even further corruption-related scandals + lawsuits
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 11 November 2017 21:01 (seven years ago)
Yeah. I think postponing the election was a desperate trial balloon that survived only for an hour or two before being shot down in flames. They'll just have to cross their fingers and go on with it. They've got no good options now. Perhaps they'll refuse to seat him, if that means Ivey gets to name his replacement.
― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 11 November 2017 21:08 (seven years ago)
idg how the majority leader can refuse to seat an elected Senator, what grounds is that based on.
― Οὖτις, Saturday, 11 November 2017 21:12 (seven years ago)
As a law-making body, the Senate has very wide latitude to make its own rules, so long as they don't conflict with constitutional dictates. It was always meant to be a bastion of the privileged, insulated from the crasser demands of politics. Keeping the riff-raff out is exactly the sort of thing the framers envisioned. Blackballing Moore would be a political bombshell, but not a constitutional crisis.
― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 11 November 2017 21:21 (seven years ago)
Make no mistake, Kay Ivey is a craven Republican Alabama governor, but she has at no point expressed any support for Roy Moore and has stated she believes his accusers. There's just no way she can publicly support Doug Jones and expect to be elected when the time comes (I would say re-elected, but she actually stepped into the role when Bentley resigned).
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Saturday, 11 November 2017 21:26 (seven years ago)
Article 1, Section Five, Clause 1:
"Each House shall be the Judge of the Elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members..."
― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 11 November 2017 21:27 (seven years ago)
the supreme court has ruled that congress has to seat elected members who meet the qualifications listed in the constitution. they can't refuse to seat them for corruption, etc.:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powell_v._McCormack
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Saturday, 11 November 2017 21:41 (seven years ago)
Ah! Good to know. Apparently, under that ruling the only way to exercise the power to 'judge of qualifications' would be to seat Moore first, then expel him upon a 2/3rds vote of the Senate. Not a likely scenario, but then, every choice the republicans are faced with if Moore wins will be pretty ugly.
It's worth remembering that Moore is fully backed by Bannon / Breitbart, and expelling him would only escalate the internal war in the party to fiercer heights.
― A is for (Aimless), Saturday, 11 November 2017 21:58 (seven years ago)
the mask is off
I'd be fine with a child predator in the Senate so long as it would keep the Democrats from stealing this seat. Child molesters are evil, Democrats are even worse— Eric Dondero R. (@EricDonderoR) November 11, 2017
― sleeve, Sunday, 12 November 2017 00:29 (seven years ago)
(dude is a Rand Paul staff member)
― sleeve, Sunday, 12 November 2017 00:30 (seven years ago)
I'd be fine with a child predator in the Senate
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/018/012/Screen_Shot_2015-05-12_at_3.31.31_PM.png
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 12 November 2017 00:32 (seven years ago)
Classic GOP
― Οὖτις, Sunday, 12 November 2017 00:43 (seven years ago)
Why would Kim Jong-un insult me by calling me "old," when I would NEVER call him "short and fat?" Oh well, I try so hard to be his friend - and maybe someday that will happen!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 12, 2017
What the fuck
― frogbs, Sunday, 12 November 2017 01:01 (seven years ago)
Donald's playful side emerges. Just as screwed up as his serious side.
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 12 November 2017 01:02 (seven years ago)
...............
― Doctor Casino, Sunday, 12 November 2017 01:04 (seven years ago)
it's been nice knowing all of you but i suppose i should probably log off now and start putting my affairs in order
― Doctor Casino, Sunday, 12 November 2017 01:05 (seven years ago)
i bet he brags about his tweets when he discusses north korea with the other leaders in the region
― Karl Malone, Sunday, 12 November 2017 01:15 (seven years ago)
xps sorry, ex-Paul staffer
― sleeve, Sunday, 12 November 2017 01:19 (seven years ago)
I would NEVER call him "short and fat"I would NEVER call him "short and fat"I would NEVER call him "short and fat"I would NEVER call him "short and fat"I would NEVER call him "short and fat"I would NEVER call him "short and fat"
― Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 12 November 2017 01:20 (seven years ago)
when I read that trump tweet on twitter I had to do that thing where you check to make sure it's not some parody account
― iatee, Sunday, 12 November 2017 01:30 (seven years ago)
Trump is flexing his superiority as a tall and fat person
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Sunday, 12 November 2017 01:42 (seven years ago)
it is the age of stoopid Roman empire reenactors
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 12 November 2017 01:52 (seven years ago)
Like okay, Donald, you understandably hate yourself and you want to die. There are much simpler solutions to this problem that I'd encourage you to investigate.
― Fresh Toast (Old Lunch), Sunday, 12 November 2017 02:44 (seven years ago)
Never saw this one:
Lightweight reporter Alex Pareene @pareene is known as a total joke in political circles. Hence, he writes for Loser Salon. @Salon— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 15, 2012
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Sunday, 12 November 2017 08:50 (seven years ago)
I know this thread is not the Donald J Trump Twitter Archive, but he's having a banner day.
Does the Fake News Media remember when Crooked Hillary Clinton, as Secretary of State, was begging Russia to be our friend with the misspelled reset button? Obama tried also, but he had zero chemistry with Putin.— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 12, 2017
― Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 12 November 2017 09:38 (seven years ago)
I mean, obviously we can agree that misspelling things is important, right?
When will all the haters and fools out there realize that having a good relationship with Russia is a good thing, not a bad thing. There always playing politics - bad for our country. I want to solve North Korea, Syria, Ukraine, terrorism, and Russia can greatly help!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 12, 2017
― Andrew Farrell, Sunday, 12 November 2017 09:41 (seven years ago)
Not as rad as the one where he promised ppl would die if we made Russia sad and listened to fake dem stuff.
― correlated noise of conformity (Hunt3r), Sunday, 12 November 2017 14:59 (seven years ago)
Obama and Putin had no chemistry. I didn't buy that they were gonna wind up together at all!
― bodak horseman (voodoo chili), Sunday, 12 November 2017 15:11 (seven years ago)
Never heard about the 'misspelled reset button' thing until today. But Trump tweeted "Phillipines" earlier so all even I guess.
― nashwan, Sunday, 12 November 2017 15:31 (seven years ago)
One of the things I find most gut-wrenching about Trump's casually nihilistic tweeting is that it may actually be that other rando choad with Trump's Twitter password who finally forces NK's hand.
― Fresh Toast (Old Lunch), Sunday, 12 November 2017 15:45 (seven years ago)
Is there even a way to keep track of who's tweeting anymore?
― Fresh Toast (Old Lunch), Sunday, 12 November 2017 15:46 (seven years ago)
New Alabama poll: Doug Jones 46%, Roy Moore 42%. First poll to show Jones in the lead. https://t.co/HVJlVUjucf— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) November 12, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 12 November 2017 16:32 (seven years ago)
I still don’t think Jones has a shot but I’m all for it
― frogbs, Sunday, 12 November 2017 16:41 (seven years ago)
Its crazy that there is *any* poll showing him ahead
― Οὖτις, Sunday, 12 November 2017 17:02 (seven years ago)
First he came for the Muslims, and I was silent. Then he came for the gays and lesbians, and I was silent. Then he came for the teenage white girls, and I was like, well, I don't know about that.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 12 November 2017 17:14 (seven years ago)
Heh
― Οὖτις, Sunday, 12 November 2017 17:40 (seven years ago)
You forget that Roy Moore is not a generic Republican; he's a uniquely hateable piece of shit who's been bringing negative attention to Alabama for something like 30 years. There are plenty of people down there who hate his guts. The maniacs got him past the finish line in the primary, because it's a Republican primary in Alabama, but he's actually a really bad general election candidate. He got blown out in the primaries in two gubernatorial elections, was removed from the Alabama Supreme Court because of the whole "Ten Commandments monument" thing, and was removed again for continuing to enforce a ban on same-sex marriage. Also, he's in trouble for stealing from his charity.
― grawlix (unperson), Sunday, 12 November 2017 18:14 (seven years ago)
I know his history. The fact is even w all that, until last weekend he was comfortably ahead.
― Οὖτις, Sunday, 12 November 2017 18:16 (seven years ago)
have we taken a look at realclearpolitics aggregate polls
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/trump_favorableunfavorable-5493.html
https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2017/nov/08/whats-happened-to-trumps-popularity-since-the-election-not-much
― i n f i n i t y (∞), Sunday, 12 November 2017 18:33 (seven years ago)
These polls are all fucking stupid. They couldn't even predict last week's groundswell VA elections right. Fuck Trump support, who gives a shit.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 12 November 2017 18:45 (seven years ago)
Perhaps the most disturbing story I have ever reported in ~15 years of covering national security is coming your way this evening.— Spencer Ackerman (@attackerman) November 12, 2017
― j., Sunday, 12 November 2017 18:54 (seven years ago)
pretty high bar
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 12 November 2017 18:56 (seven years ago)
coming your way this evening
15 second promo
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 12 November 2017 18:58 (seven years ago)
re: polling averages: 538 I believe takes the stance that comparing a candidate's favorability to an in-office president's job approval ratings is not an apples-to-apples comparison. so their charts, unlike RCP's, start from inauguration and show a slightly different story: a quick early loss of net approval, a slower erosion into the summer (up to and including the health care debacle) and then essentially stasis since that point - up a point, down a point, never really gaining back any of that loss ground or losing any of those who stuck with him through the above.
just picking the numbers from the 23rd of each month, approval followed by disapproval:
Jan 45.5 / 41.3Feb 43.0 / 49.8Mar 42.3 / 51.8Apr 41.6 / 52.9May 39.1 / 51.4Jun 39.8 / 55.1Jul 38.5 / 55.6Aug 36.9 / 56.8Sep 39.0 / 54.0Oct 37.5 / 56.4
note that the very first set, the best here, is already historically bad. he's deeply unpopular and has not rectified that in any way or discovered new blocs of support or anything. and along the way he's definitely shed some support - around eight out of a hundred americans who said they approved in january don't say that now. and of course these numbers don't get into the "strongly approve" vs. "approve" numbers but those have also been bad for him.
― Doctor Casino, Sunday, 12 November 2017 19:52 (seven years ago)
and, if it wasn't clear, fourteen or fifteen out of a hundred americans who didn't disapprove of him in january disapprove of him now. even if you say january was an outlier, okay, well, five or so out of a hundred who didn't disapprove of him in february disapprove of him now. that's terrible. it only looks weird because he is a fascist maniac and it is profoundly disturbing to us that the numbers are not 0 / 100 from the word go.
― Doctor Casino, Sunday, 12 November 2017 19:54 (seven years ago)
I literally cannot remember what terrible things he did in August for it to mark his nadir
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Sunday, 12 November 2017 21:05 (seven years ago)
Was it the Nazi rally?
God this past year has been a fucking nightmare
this past year has lasted 28 months iirc
― wow. that was truly the minecraft of sex. (bizarro gazzara), Sunday, 12 November 2017 21:06 (seven years ago)
That's why I'm so sick of the stupid "Trump lovers still love Trump" stories that still, somehow, get the go-ahead from national news editors. I want to see some newspaper put the research budget into finding one, never mind a half-dozen, just one Clinton voter who has subsequently joined the Trump cult. But they can't. So they keep sucking up to his white trash diehards and saying, "Hey, racist idiot, got a minute to spew some racist idiocy into this recording device?"
― grawlix (unperson), Sunday, 12 November 2017 21:22 (seven years ago)
i'm not sure but i think the lowest point so far - just eyeballing for the gap between the numbers - is august 2nd: 37.0% approve, 57.5% disapprove. that was just after mccain torpedoed "skinny repeal" and more generally the long grind of the health care period. i feel comfortable saying that did more to hurt his numbers with the general public than anything since the first rush of terrible news. but there's so much shit that it's impossible to really tease it apart - scaramucci also had his moment the same week!
he seemed to be recovering just a bit after that but then charlottesville happened a week later and he went right back to basically those numbers in the second half of august. the sad thing is that for all we know some of that disapproval was from outraged fans of bannon, who was let go august 18th.
― Doctor Casino, Sunday, 12 November 2017 21:23 (seven years ago)
That's why I'm so sick of the stupid "Trump lovers still love Trump" stories
And note that it's not "Trump voters still love Trump" -- they always find the people who already believed Hillary murdered Vince Foster. Yes! I knew those guys were crazy already! Show me the people who voted Obama twice and then Trump. There are plenty of them and they're the ones whose votes matter. Are they still on board?
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 12 November 2017 21:50 (seven years ago)
Saw two of those specimens on telly last week. Mostly used it to be able to say they couldn't be racist... Still backed Trump. Actual convo w/ interviewer:
"He's done more in 8 months than Obama did in 8 years!""Like what?""Well look sir, I'm no expert on politics y'know..""What good thing has he done since he's in office?""Well that's the thing! It's other people keeping him from doing anything!"
etc etc
― Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 12 November 2017 21:56 (seven years ago)
No, I don't even care about Obama voters who voted Trump. I want them to find a Hillary voter who now believes Trump is a competent leader.
― grawlix (unperson), Sunday, 12 November 2017 22:14 (seven years ago)
"What good thing has he done since he's in office?"
It's not what he does nearly as much as his performative aspect. He put the kibosh on the Paris Accords. He trash-talked at the NFL players. He kept trying to ban Muslims. He tweets things his voters respond to.
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 12 November 2017 22:24 (seven years ago)
I want them to find a Hillary voter who now believes Trump is a competent leader.
I mean I get that you want that but ... they won't. Or if they did, they'd be finding someone representative of so-small-as-to-be-irrelevant slice of the electorate. So why would a newspaper do this?
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Sunday, 12 November 2017 22:48 (seven years ago)
kinda want to never hear about anything related to the 2016 election ever again tbh
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Sunday, 12 November 2017 22:50 (seven years ago)
https://filmgrimoire.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/seventh-seal-360.jpg
― Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 12 November 2017 22:58 (seven years ago)
It's not what he does nearly as much as his performative aspect
Right. He has the right enemies, he makes libs apoplectic, he brings the fight to the dems and the media, he makes political incorrectness mainstream, he "says what I think."
Oh, and the hated Hillary will never be president. So if that was your only goal, he's achieved all you could ask. Anything else is gravy.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Sunday, 12 November 2017 23:32 (seven years ago)
This may be what Ackerman was referring to, idk:
https://www.csoonline.com/article/3236721/security/homeland-security-team-remotely-hacked-a-boeing-757.amp.html
― Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Sunday, 12 November 2017 23:46 (seven years ago)
if it is, then that's lame
― El Tomboto, Monday, 13 November 2017 00:06 (seven years ago)
It can’t be - I have just seen a story from 48 hours ago mentioning the same thing.
― Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Monday, 13 November 2017 00:07 (seven years ago)
I mean car hacking vs plane hacking is a difference of degree, not kind
― El Tomboto, Monday, 13 November 2017 00:08 (seven years ago)
sometimes i think i'm goin' insane, i swear i might car-hack a plane
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 13 November 2017 00:23 (seven years ago)
Hey Spencer Ackerman, if it was such a big fucking deal you wouldn't have teased it like some shitty "tune in tomorrow" promo.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 00:25 (seven years ago)
Ackerman broke the Valerie Plame story iirc so...
― Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Monday, 13 November 2017 00:34 (seven years ago)
remember that giant dump i was preparing to unload back during the campaign? well, it continued to grow and then had a baby of its own, and the whole family is dropping in tonight
― Karl Malone, Monday, 13 November 2017 00:35 (seven years ago)
So why play coy, Ackerman?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 00:40 (seven years ago)
https://www.thedailybeast.com/green-beret-discovered-seals-illicit-cash-then-he-was-killed
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 13 November 2017 01:13 (seven years ago)
meh
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 13 November 2017 01:17 (seven years ago)
this is good
http://pressthink.org/2017/11/pricing-access-trump-white-house-strange-case-times-social-media-policy/
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 13 November 2017 03:24 (seven years ago)
thing is his popularity since jan hasnt changed much (3 pts?)
he has to act strategically (pander to the same people who voted him in), which might be difficult for trump to do, in order to ensure he gets the same voters and turnout in 2020
bc loads of lefties will come out to vote against him
shld be interesting
― i n f i n i t y (∞), Monday, 13 November 2017 03:43 (seven years ago)
he is massively, historically unpopular for a first-year president
he has little room to fall, considering perennial levels of base support in a two-party system and the toxic media environment, so his percentage drops slowly, but it’s done so in a fairly consistent manner
― sciatica, Monday, 13 November 2017 03:51 (seven years ago)
the seal story does seem to be the one ackerman was hyping fwiw
― sciatica, Monday, 13 November 2017 04:00 (seven years ago)
oops sorry misread the link above, guess that’s not in question
― sciatica, Monday, 13 November 2017 04:02 (seven years ago)
"3 pts?" again:Jan 45.5 / 41.3Feb 43.0 / 49.8Mar 42.3 / 51.8Apr 41.6 / 52.9May 39.1 / 51.4Jun 39.8 / 55.1Jul 38.5 / 55.6Aug 36.9 / 56.8Sep 39.0 / 54.0Oct 37.5 / 56.4
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 13 November 2017 04:04 (seven years ago)
anyone know what's happening here?
https://i.imgur.com/04hi1qV.jpg
― The Fortnightly Intruder (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Monday, 13 November 2017 04:11 (seven years ago)
rage shit on the world stage
― Moodles, Monday, 13 November 2017 04:12 (seven years ago)
dr casino
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/
― i n f i n i t y (∞), Monday, 13 November 2017 04:20 (seven years ago)
yes... as I said upthread that's where I was getting those numbers....?
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 13 November 2017 04:38 (seven years ago)
did i typo one of them or something?
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 13 November 2017 04:39 (seven years ago)
o my bad got dyslexia for a mo
you're right
― i n f i n i t y (∞), Monday, 13 November 2017 04:40 (seven years ago)
Hypocritical Dems won’t vote for Roy Moore who has a complete head but would vote for JFK, a man with only HALF A HEAD— Pixelated “Pixelated Boat” Boat (@pixelatedboat) November 13, 2017
strange how the left is mad abt pedophile Roy Moore running for senate but says nothing about 19th century congressman Charles Upshaw’s several extramarital affairs— KRANG T. NELSON (@KrangTNelson) November 13, 2017
― The Fortnightly Intruder (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Monday, 13 November 2017 05:55 (seven years ago)
Is he standing, like?
― Mark G, Monday, 13 November 2017 11:23 (seven years ago)
the seal story
kissed by a rose: the seal story
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 13 November 2017 12:39 (seven years ago)
Good magazine story on how old-fashioned phone banks and door-to-door visits paid off in Virginia local races.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 November 2017 12:45 (seven years ago)
Can confirm; we answered the landline even less than we normally do for the weeks leading up to the election. We went from almost never to absolutely never, because it was always always always well-intentioned election phone bankers or recorded GOTV calls. Next time I will have the outgoing vm message be YES WE'RE VOTING STRAIGHT DEM, OKAY? LIKE WE ALWAYS DO, SINCE NINETEEN-EIGHTY-FUCKING-EIGHT. NOW LEAVE US ALONE.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 13 November 2017 14:23 (seven years ago)
I know it works, and I've done it myself, but I don't understand the effectiveness of door-to-door. is it supposed to remind people to vote? Convince people who are planning to stay home to go out and vote? Convince people to change their vote?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 14:25 (seven years ago)
reminder mainly? i did a few hours of it in 2008 right before the election and people really didn't know their polling place, had the day of the week wrong in their heads etc. i think it helps.
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 13 November 2017 14:35 (seven years ago)
This is probably my hyper-motivated bubble talking, but: It seems crazy to me that there are people who are motivated enough to vote, but not motivated enough to figure out where/when/how.
But as Dr. C. says, they are out there. And I would much rather have "us" (broadly speaking) finding and reminding those people than let it be "them" who does so.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 13 November 2017 14:40 (seven years ago)
(And of course there is an age-old misinformation tactic where a local party might wish to let it be known that Republicans are supposed to vote on Tuesday and Democrats on Wednesday, or whatever, "to alleviate overcrowding.")
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 13 November 2017 14:42 (seven years ago)
I've told this story before, but I canvassed Milwaukee for Obama right at the height of the Scott Walker stuff, and these people were soooo annoyed at having people ring their doorbells all day. They were getting three, four visitors a day, and the mailings, calls and visits had been going on for weeks. You can't take your front door off the hook.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 14:46 (seven years ago)
I really only go out the front to check the mail and always use the back entrance. I had a giant tree branch on the porch for a couple days before I noticed.
― mh, Monday, 13 November 2017 14:55 (seven years ago)
Trump and Duterte having a laugh about how journalists are *spies" "Hah, hah, hah" pic.twitter.com/6DjpIZznRc— Gabriel Snyder (@gabrielsnyder) November 13, 2017
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 13 November 2017 15:02 (seven years ago)
prob closer to "heh heh heh"
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 November 2017 15:05 (seven years ago)
I’m waiting for the hot mic recording where Duterte advises Trump to murder everyone suspected of doing drugs and Trump agrees that it’s a great idea
― Karl Malone, Monday, 13 November 2017 15:19 (seven years ago)
"you chinese are okay after all"
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Monday, 13 November 2017 15:21 (seven years ago)
Just in: Gloria Allred is holding a press conference at 2:30pm today in New York with a NEW accuser of former Alabama Judge Roy Moore— Michael Del Moro (@MikeDelMoro) November 13, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 13 November 2017 15:49 (seven years ago)
For the longest time I (like I assume most) only knew her as sort of a high profile celebrity ambulance chancer - and maybe she still is! - but that New Yorker profile really brought me around to viewing her as a tireless feminist advocate. Good for Gloria.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 15:52 (seven years ago)
g-l-o-r-i-a
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 13 November 2017 16:01 (seven years ago)
.@SenateMajLdr on Roy Moore allegations “I believe the women.”— Nick Storm (@NStorm_Politics) November 13, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 13 November 2017 16:11 (seven years ago)
Which women, the ones accusing Moore or the ones accusing Trump? Asking for a friend.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 16:13 (seven years ago)
Because Mitch sort of backs himself into a corner with this one. Bannon on the right, anti-Trump people on the left. Not that he cares, but for whatever reason this is the battle that makes him take a side? He's so slimy it almost makes me want Moore elected just to see what damage he would do, but obv. I would be more than happy with Jones. Luck or no, having the Jeff Sessions Alabama fucker senate seat go to a Dem would be so delicious.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 16:15 (seven years ago)
McConnell must be secretly loving this a bit, the idea of taking down Bannon's useful pediot.
― omar little, Monday, 13 November 2017 16:18 (seven years ago)
Take him down how? Moore supporters are not McConnell supporters, and Bannon has explicitly targeted Mitch. Maybe Mitch knows that a Moore win might make him even more at risk? Maybe Mitch just realized that being an "establishment" asshole is not good enough? Who knows.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 16:22 (seven years ago)
Mitch sometimes seems to be the only one thinking a couple of moves ahead, but maybe he has just been lucky. It's so hard to tell. Does the dude even have smarts?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 16:23 (seven years ago)
No
― Frederik B, Monday, 13 November 2017 16:30 (seven years ago)
No. He looks smart because his colleagues are imbeciles.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 November 2017 16:34 (seven years ago)
Plenty of pro-Moore sentiment is inextricably bound up with anti-McConnell sentiment.
While Moore/Trump voters vote straight Republican 105% of the time, they are not shy about saying they hate McConnell/Ryan almost as much as they hate dems/libs/POC/gays.
I think everybody involved knows that full well. Mitch may prefer to lose the AL seat and have a narrower margin, because that's useful as cover for yet more of:
1. not doing anything
2. being able to blame someone else
It's a gamble.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 13 November 2017 16:35 (seven years ago)
In the land of quasi-sentient brainstems, the man with a tiny nodule of tissue resting atop the brainstem is king.
― Fresh Toast (Old Lunch), Monday, 13 November 2017 16:37 (seven years ago)
despite the high stakes of a lost senate seat i think mitch would probably feel like he has nothing to lose here. moore in office would be out of control (it's basically his career-defining selling point!), and a huge millstone around the necks of any blue- or purple-state senator: the party of roy moore, why has senator x not voted to censure roy moore, etc. may as well score some fraction of PR points by appearing to condemn him. didn't apply to trump but hey.
obviously mitch's own seat is safe, if he even wants to keep doing this shit into his 80s. and as others have observed he may well find it personally easier to be the leader of a united opposition that keeps anything he opposes from getting accomplished, than the leader of a divided majority that's unable to get anything he supports accomplished.
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 13 November 2017 16:42 (seven years ago)
mcconnell's no dummy when it comes to at least being dimly aware of the fact that a Moore win would further push the already-racist GOP further right in the eyes of voters nationwide and particularly in key states where 2018 R-candidates are on the hot seat. i'm not sure he'd be *happy* to lose the seat, but i don't think anything makes Mitch happy except for seeing his enemies suffer humiliation.
― omar little, Monday, 13 November 2017 16:44 (seven years ago)
there are levels of survival he is prepared to accept
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 13 November 2017 16:48 (seven years ago)
Possible effect of Gloria Allred working with a Roy Moore accuser: It could bait Trump into responding. She also represents Trump accuser Summer Zervos.— Benjy Sarlin (@BenjySarlin) November 13, 2017
I have a tough time imagining Trump watching the Fox segment on this press conference, seeing Allred, and not at least thinking about a tweet.— Benjy Sarlin (@BenjySarlin) November 13, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 13 November 2017 17:14 (seven years ago)
"Gullible Gloria...Not A Ten! Get Back To Chasing Ambulances!"
― to fly across the city and find Aerosmith's car (C. Grisso/McCain), Monday, 13 November 2017 18:36 (seven years ago)
do you think Trump pays close attention to who opposing counsel is on cases here he's being sued?
I mean, I would lean toward yes, but his attention is very sporadic
― mh, Monday, 13 November 2017 18:36 (seven years ago)
She was very public about taking the case of Trump's accuser, and she's a woman who had the audacity to oppose him, so I'm sure he remembers. Embittered grievance is his food and drink.
― Home of the Ill-Considered Gravy Spigot (Old Lunch), Monday, 13 November 2017 18:39 (seven years ago)
Gloria Allred is also famous, which is one of Two Scoops' main gages for individual value.
― to fly across the city and find Aerosmith's car (C. Grisso/McCain), Monday, 13 November 2017 18:40 (seven years ago)
he still talks about Rosie O'Donnell iirc
― omar little, Monday, 13 November 2017 18:41 (seven years ago)
Rosie attended his wedding in the early 90s!
― mh, Monday, 13 November 2017 18:41 (seven years ago)
I read that last quote from caek as "seeing Alfred, and not at least thinking about a tweet."
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Monday, 13 November 2017 18:43 (seven years ago)
"The Eagles Were One Of The Greatest Bands Ever! "Don't Stop Believing" in #MAGA"
― to fly across the city and find Aerosmith's car (C. Grisso/McCain), Monday, 13 November 2017 18:45 (seven years ago)
I have now read Mr. Moore’s statement and listened to his radio interview in which he denies the charges. I did not find his denials to be convincing and believe that he should withdraw from the Senate race in Alabama.— Sen. Susan Collins (@SenatorCollins) November 13, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 13 November 2017 18:50 (seven years ago)
I inspire Trump tweets, see.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 November 2017 18:52 (seven years ago)
hope this is the thing that shreds the GOP as a party but that's probably hoping for too much
― akm, Monday, 13 November 2017 18:54 (seven years ago)
some real brain salad surgery here:
One idea now being discussed under this scenario, brought up by two different White House officials who spoke on condition of anonymity, would be for Gov. Kay Ivey of Alabama to block Mr. Moore if he wins, and then immediately appoint Attorney General Jeff Sessions to what had been his seat when it becomes vacant again. Mr. Sessions remains highly popular among Alabama Republicans, but his relationship with President Trump has waned since he recused himself from the investigation of the role that Russia played in last year’s campaign.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 November 2017 18:58 (seven years ago)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2017/11/13/you-want-to-see-how-to-stand-up-to-trump/
everything's coming up KASICH
― j., Monday, 13 November 2017 19:04 (seven years ago)
Question I haven't seen answered anywhere: If Moore wins and the Senate refuses to seat him, what happens? Does the Senate just operate with 99 until the next election? I can't imagine the answer is that the Senate or the Governor would have the authority to just appoint any random person to the seat in his place or immediately hold another election, because if that was true then they'd DEFINITELY already be planning on doing that.
― evol j, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:05 (seven years ago)
We've seen this playbook before: last October after the Access Hollywood tape. If Jones doesn't win, then Roy Moore will go to the Senate.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:07 (seven years ago)
Given how much my educator-heavy OH family despises Kasich, this is somewhat scary, but at least it's scary in the sense of "I don't think this man will use Twitter to get us into a nuclear war".
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:09 (seven years ago)
obviously I hope Jones wins but the idea of Moore showing up to Capitol Hill and being a gigantic ass cancer to the entire GOP is hardly the worst consolation prize.
― evol j, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:09 (seven years ago)
right up until he starts a wave of repellent nightmare senators/reps in 2018
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:10 (seven years ago)
the nice thing about the national level is that the ability to fuck up the education system is broader in reach but much shallower in scope, as school privatization jerk DeVos has been figuring out
― mh, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:11 (seven years ago)
and the Senate refuses to seat him
this isn't going to happen
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:11 (seven years ago)
idk, as much as deep cynicism has been richly rewarded the past year and a half, i do think Alabama is its own fairly special hell.
― evol j, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:11 (seven years ago)
the GOP folded like a wet napkin for Trump, they'll do their scolding and folding routine if Moore wins too.
― omar little, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:12 (seven years ago)
US Politics November 2017
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:13 (seven years ago)
it seems like the only reason they wouldn't refuse to seat him though is they lack any alternative. I'm sure McConnell and co. would rather have anyone in America with an R next to their name occupy that seat than Moore at this point.
― evol j, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:13 (seven years ago)
Every state is its own special hell in one way or another; it's built directly into the way the country works.
I mean, you'd think that Kansas would be enough of a cautionary tale to people about where all of this is heading but people generally don't give a rat's ass until it happens to them, and even then they only blame the actual people who did it to them 50% of the time.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:14 (seven years ago)
What's up guys Lib Destroyer 67 here, today I'm gonna fuck up this snoopy sno cone machine for reasons unclear even to me— vineyille (@vineyille) November 13, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:15 (seven years ago)
I rarely read the old fraud anymore, but George Will otm.
Moore campaigns almost entirely about social issues — National Football League protests, the transgender menace — and the wild liberalism of Jones, a law-and-order prosecutor and deer and turkey hunter who says he has “a safe full of guns.” Jones’s grandfathers were members of the mineworkers’ and steelworkers’ unions: Birmingham, surrounded by coal and iron ore, was Pittsburgh — a steel city — almost before Pittsburgh was. Jones hopes economic and health-care issues matter more.
Evangelical Christians who embrace Moore are serving the public good by making ridiculous their pose as uniquely moral Americans, and by revealing their leaders to be especially grotesque specimens of the vanity — vanity about virtue — that is curdling politics. Another public benefit from the Moore spectacle is the embarrassment of national Republicans.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:15 (seven years ago)
tbh some of the states with the worst education are now at the point where they don't understand the nature of what's happening to them because the school never taught them how government works
― mh, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:15 (seven years ago)
The post I linked spells out that they *have* to seat him. They're only option is to have a 2/3rds majority vote in the Senate to expel him *after* he has been seated. Good luck with that.
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:16 (seven years ago)
lol Alfred was just about to link to that Will piece
*I* was just about to link to it, I meant
republicans in the house still fondly refer to their method of maintaining speaker control as "the Hastert rule" so I don't think they have any qualms about anything, really
― mh, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:18 (seven years ago)
haha yes I was trying to find some previous post I made about how the GOP is fine with pedos, it was just a month or two ago
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:20 (seven years ago)
"Pedophilia's OK when GOPers do it" = the *real* Hastert rule
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:21 (seven years ago)
but if they voted to expel him, THEN what would happen? that was my original question. I'm assuming there are no good options, otherwise I don't see why this route might not at least be entertained (unless you're assuming Democrats would uniformly vote to not expel Moore as a way to make the GOP eat their own shit).
― evol j, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:22 (seven years ago)
but if they voted to expel him, THEN what would happen?
Roy Moore shoots every GOP senator.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:24 (seven years ago)
Roy Moore supporter Brandon Moseley of @ALReporter on CNN just now compared sexual touching of a 14-year old to stealing a lawnmower, stressing it was a misdemeanor pic.twitter.com/UJ1Bf7JehZ— Aaron Blake (@AaronBlake) November 13, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:29 (seven years ago)
the lawnmower gambit
I mean, you don't usually steal a lawnmower with your penis.
At least, not more than once.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:29 (seven years ago)
If they don't seat him, they have a scapegoat whenever someone accuses them of being misogynists or apologists. They'll point to not seating Moore as a moral pinnacle and continue being horrible in every other way.
― mh, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:30 (seven years ago)
dude looks like he is sexually touching a 14yo while being interviewed
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:30 (seven years ago)
if the Senate expels him, doesn't that just mean that AL has to have another election
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:31 (seven years ago)
Alabama, that's not what a lawnmower is for
― omar little, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:31 (seven years ago)
these guys treat every moral/legal problem they've had like jaywalking, and also think anyone who's not them should get beat up by a cop for jaywalking
― mh, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:31 (seven years ago)
"beat up", we should be so lucky
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:33 (seven years ago)
kneeling on a sports field: deport thempursuing underage children: execute thempursuing underage children while republican: elect them
― omar little, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:34 (seven years ago)
if moore wins the senate will seat him. everybody will forget about it in a couple of months
― marcos, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:35 (seven years ago)
― Οὖτις, Monday, November 13, 2017
hearty LOL
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:36 (seven years ago)
the Senate boasted James Vardaman, "Cotton" Ed Smith, Theodore Bilbo, and Strom Thurmond, often in leadership roles.
The Senate can fuck right off.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:37 (seven years ago)
Touching the lawnmower over the grass catcher or under the grass catcher.
― nickn, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:43 (seven years ago)
WaPo breakdown of unlikely scenarios
Senate Republican leaders are making clear they would rather have a Democrat join them in the Senate than Roy Moore, who has been accused of initiating sexual contact with a 14-year-old girl when he was in his 30s. But there's not much they can do about it before the election. Even if the Alabama Republican Senate candidate were to suddenly heed their calls to drop out, his name would still appear on the ballot in December's special election.After the election, though, is a different story. If nearly half of Senate Republicans join with all 48 Democratic senators, they could kick out the newest Alabama senator shortly after he takes a seat. The Constitution lets the Senate censure or even expel its members, but it hasn't successfully happened since the Civil War. Now, in the wake of allegations that Moore dated teenage girls and touched a 14-year-old inappropriately (an allegation he denies), some senators seem to be considering it.Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) floated the idea of expelling Moore on NBC's “Meet the Press” on Sunday. When asked about it on the same show, Sen. Patrick J. Toomey (R-Pa.) didn't rule it out: “We'll have to — we'll wrestle with that if and when the time comes,” he said.Here's how it would work, as guided by Senate procedural experts Sarah Binder of the Brookings Institution and Josh Chafetz of Cornell Law.1. Decide whether they can stop him from taking the seat: The Senate has constitutional power to decide whether to seat someone the voters elect, and that only requires a majority vote, Chafetz said. But the rules around this are pretty strict and probably don't follow this case: The Senate can only prevent someone from taking their seat if they either weren't duly elected or don't have the constitutional qualifications to be a senator (like being under the age of 30 or not a U.S. citizen). "They can’t just exclude someone because they don’t like him or even because he has committed a crime; it has to be because he’s not actually entitled to a seat," Chafetz said.2. The Senate's Ethics Committee moves to conduct an investigation into Moore: Just like the Senate is running its own investigation into Russia meddling, senators almost certainly wouldn't vote to expel one of their own based on one news report, no matter how carefully reported it is. (As far as litigating decades-old sexual allegations in the media goes, this story is as close to proof as reporters can get.) They'd launch their own investigation, likely calling in witnesses and perhaps even talking to Moore himself.3. If the committee finds grounds to expel Moore, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) decides to bring up the question of expulsion for a vote before the full Senate. He hasn't commented publicly on whether he's even considering this. But on Monday, he did say he believes Moore's accusers, and he said Moore should leave the race.4. Two-thirds of the Senate votes to expel him: That means all 48 senators who caucus with the Democrats, plus 19 Senate Republicans.This last step in particular is an extraordinarily high bar to clear; getting a two-thirds majority in the Senate is one of the hardest things to do in politics. The requirement in the Senate to expel a senator is the same required to override a veto or change the Constitution. The last time the Senate had this much agreement on a controversial topic was when it sent new Russia sanctions to President Trump's desk.Expelling a senator is also extraordinarily rare. Binder said the last senator expelled by the Senate was in 1862, when the Senate voted to expel more than two dozen members on the grounds of supporting the Confederacy during the Civil War.A century later, the Senate twice got close to kicking out senators only to see them step down. Moore's defiance to establishment Washington throughout this entire campaign suggests that's not something he'd consider.There's another roadblock to getting rid of Moore. The Senate has a long-standing, unwritten rule that they don't kick out someone for conduct known to the voters at the time that senator was elected, Chafetz said.The thinking behind that is to avoid a slippery slope where the Senate is overriding the will of the voters.For now, this is mostly a theoretical debate. It's possible that Democrat Doug Jones beats Moore in the election next month. Before the allegations, Jones was already within a six-point margin, according to a RealClearPolitics average of polls. Afterward, some polls show him even.But if Moore does pull out a win, the Senate could seriously consider doing something it hasn't done in more than a century: unseat one of their own.
After the election, though, is a different story. If nearly half of Senate Republicans join with all 48 Democratic senators, they could kick out the newest Alabama senator shortly after he takes a seat. The Constitution lets the Senate censure or even expel its members, but it hasn't successfully happened since the Civil War. Now, in the wake of allegations that Moore dated teenage girls and touched a 14-year-old inappropriately (an allegation he denies), some senators seem to be considering it.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) floated the idea of expelling Moore on NBC's “Meet the Press” on Sunday. When asked about it on the same show, Sen. Patrick J. Toomey (R-Pa.) didn't rule it out: “We'll have to — we'll wrestle with that if and when the time comes,” he said.
Here's how it would work, as guided by Senate procedural experts Sarah Binder of the Brookings Institution and Josh Chafetz of Cornell Law.
1. Decide whether they can stop him from taking the seat: The Senate has constitutional power to decide whether to seat someone the voters elect, and that only requires a majority vote, Chafetz said. But the rules around this are pretty strict and probably don't follow this case: The Senate can only prevent someone from taking their seat if they either weren't duly elected or don't have the constitutional qualifications to be a senator (like being under the age of 30 or not a U.S. citizen). "They can’t just exclude someone because they don’t like him or even because he has committed a crime; it has to be because he’s not actually entitled to a seat," Chafetz said.
2. The Senate's Ethics Committee moves to conduct an investigation into Moore: Just like the Senate is running its own investigation into Russia meddling, senators almost certainly wouldn't vote to expel one of their own based on one news report, no matter how carefully reported it is. (As far as litigating decades-old sexual allegations in the media goes, this story is as close to proof as reporters can get.) They'd launch their own investigation, likely calling in witnesses and perhaps even talking to Moore himself.
3. If the committee finds grounds to expel Moore, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) decides to bring up the question of expulsion for a vote before the full Senate. He hasn't commented publicly on whether he's even considering this. But on Monday, he did say he believes Moore's accusers, and he said Moore should leave the race.
4. Two-thirds of the Senate votes to expel him: That means all 48 senators who caucus with the Democrats, plus 19 Senate Republicans.
This last step in particular is an extraordinarily high bar to clear; getting a two-thirds majority in the Senate is one of the hardest things to do in politics. The requirement in the Senate to expel a senator is the same required to override a veto or change the Constitution. The last time the Senate had this much agreement on a controversial topic was when it sent new Russia sanctions to President Trump's desk.
Expelling a senator is also extraordinarily rare. Binder said the last senator expelled by the Senate was in 1862, when the Senate voted to expel more than two dozen members on the grounds of supporting the Confederacy during the Civil War.
A century later, the Senate twice got close to kicking out senators only to see them step down. Moore's defiance to establishment Washington throughout this entire campaign suggests that's not something he'd consider.
There's another roadblock to getting rid of Moore. The Senate has a long-standing, unwritten rule that they don't kick out someone for conduct known to the voters at the time that senator was elected, Chafetz said.
The thinking behind that is to avoid a slippery slope where the Senate is overriding the will of the voters.
For now, this is mostly a theoretical debate. It's possible that Democrat Doug Jones beats Moore in the election next month. Before the allegations, Jones was already within a six-point margin, according to a RealClearPolitics average of polls. Afterward, some polls show him even.
But if Moore does pull out a win, the Senate could seriously consider doing something it hasn't done in more than a century: unseat one of their own.
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:44 (seven years ago)
that would turn into such a clusterfuck for the GOP, i can't even imagine the reaction from the Bannon wing of the party.
― omar little, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:47 (seven years ago)
Does the dude [nb: McConnell] even have smarts?
I doubt you'd be impressed by his smarts as they are ordinarily measured, but political smarts are a fairly specialized branch, in the same way that surgeons may be among the bottom of their class academically, but still be excellent surgeons. McConnell has a very narrowly and specialized knowledge base that applies directly to his work, within which he is eminent, but the moment you move outside that framework I think there'd be a drastic drop off.
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:51 (seven years ago)
Dying at DJP's penis/lawnmower retort, but the more I look at Brandon Moseley, the more I think he may have tried it.
― the young, low level volunteer named (Dan Peterson), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:53 (seven years ago)
Wow, just a year from electing a proud sexual assaulter to "Touching a 14-year-old is just a misdemeanor." Where will we be 12 months from now?
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:54 (seven years ago)
"healthcare win: the GOP in conjunction with north korea will now offer free radiation treatment for cancer patients."
― omar little, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:56 (seven years ago)
That surgeon comparison is pretty helpful.
Moore accuser currently crying on TV. She accuses Moore of assaulting her when she was 15 and 16. Moore would hang out at a restaurant until closing and mack on the teens, like a real predator. She got into his car, hoping for a ride home, but instead he drove her to the back of the restaurant, parked in the dark, and that's where the assault occurred. Horrifying story in progress.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:57 (seven years ago)
Accuser describing attempted rape, full stop. "You're just a child, but I'm the district attorney, and if you tell anyone about this no one will believe you."
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 19:58 (seven years ago)
She (a Trump supporter) told lots of family members.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:00 (seven years ago)
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Monday, 13 November 2017 19:54 (four minutes ago) Permalink
on ilx arguing about a tv show or pop song or marvel puzzle quest
― sleepingbag, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:00 (seven years ago)
Wow, she has a portrait someone did of her when she was 16. She has her high school yearbook, which Moore had signed.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:03 (seven years ago)
She was 15 in 1977, the year of the yearbook.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:04 (seven years ago)
. She has her high school yearbook, which Moore had signed.
hooooly shit
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:05 (seven years ago)
here's the (upsetting) text of her statement
Beverly Young Nelson alleges Roy Moore “began squeezing my neck attempting to force my head into his crotch.” She was 16. pic.twitter.com/dForLnaVnp
Nelson says Moore would eat at the restaurant where she worked, flirting and pulling her hair starting when she was 15. He allegedly wrote this in her HS yearbook. pic.twitter.com/MeIrRVPUlb
― Number None, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:08 (seven years ago)
sorry, I meant to link there rather than embed
this is insane
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:08 (seven years ago)
He signed it, "Love, Roy Moore, D.A."
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 13 November 2017 20:11 (seven years ago)
Well that's that, right? Is even Breitbart going to have the stomach to go after her?
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Monday, 13 November 2017 20:11 (seven years ago)
(I know, I shouldn't be so naive.)
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Monday, 13 November 2017 20:12 (seven years ago)
Maybe it was some other Roy Moore, D.A.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:13 (seven years ago)
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Monday, November 13, 2017 12:11 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i suspect -- yes, and yes
― omar little, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:13 (seven years ago)
Meanwhile, Menendez jury tells judge they are deadlocked. He's not off the hook yet, but at least he's staying put for a while longer.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:17 (seven years ago)
Breitbart and Moore are some never-say-die fuckers, they aren't going to give up
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:18 (seven years ago)
the standard for a bribery conviction is currently an exchange of a sack of cash with a dollar sign on it with a note that says 'FOR BRIBES' accompanied with a memo of the quid pro quo
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 13 November 2017 20:20 (seven years ago)
The plan: Let the voters elect Moore. The Senate refuses to seat him. He resigns and the guv appoints Strange.
― Bnad, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:21 (seven years ago)
I don't know why it only occurred to me now while reading Young Nelson's account that my college a capella group's signature song is "You're Sixteen"
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Monday, 13 November 2017 20:23 (seven years ago)
The plan: hold your nose, embrace the skunk, then take a bath in milk, hoping no one notices the stench.
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 13 November 2017 20:23 (seven years ago)
It would be great if people would stop holding on to this fiction that the Senate is going to block Moore from being seated.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Monday, 13 November 2017 20:24 (seven years ago)
i have a better method for avoiding skunk stank but whatever floats their boat
― omar little, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:25 (seven years ago)
yeah they're going to seat him, period. the game plan is to simply prevent him from getting past the post, but with sufficient deniability.
― El Tomboto, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:28 (seven years ago)
This is a disaster for GOP but it should be an even bigger disaster for the Bannon / Breitbart wing. They wanted Moore instead of Strange, and it has been a catastrophe. But they are going to continue on in 2018 as if nothing has happened, right? I don't get where they get the money, even the Mercers must at some point realize they can't deliver whatever it is that these people want.
― Frederik B, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:38 (seven years ago)
The people who brought you the unmerged layers of the Obama birth certificate PDF are not to be dissuaded by a grown attorney's signature in a dated yearbook, come on. That could have been written in yesterday by a snickering Hillary Clinton. Better get pajamaheddin amateur ink analysts to show that the pen used was manufactured in the late 2000s. See? It's Ra(th)ergate again!
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 13 November 2017 20:39 (seven years ago)
I think we may only be a year out from a republican candidate who makes public appearances slathered in the viscera of the person he's most recently serial murdered. And who wins, naturally.
― Home of the Ill-Considered Gravy Spigot (Old Lunch), Monday, 13 November 2017 20:40 (seven years ago)
the pen used was manufactured in the late 2000s.
Surely the Deep State® has better forgery resources than that!
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 13 November 2017 20:43 (seven years ago)
NRSC Chairman Cory Gardner on Moore: "he is unfit to serve in the United States Senate and he should not run for office. If he refuses to withdraw and wins, the Senate should vote to expel him" pic.twitter.com/VVoureII4c— Alexis Levinson (@alexis_levinson) November 13, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 13 November 2017 20:43 (seven years ago)
a republican candidate who makes public appearances slathered in the viscera of the person he's most recently serial murdered
Slogan: "He's not soft on crime victims!"
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 13 November 2017 20:44 (seven years ago)
i'm sure some enterprising young future GOP Senator is working on a compare n contrast, show that this new accuser is actually a crisis actor and here look, you can see her crying in the crowd in after the Route 91 festival.
― omar little, Monday, 13 November 2017 20:45 (seven years ago)
https://realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2017/senate/al/alabama_senate_special_election_moore_vs_jones-6271.html
Last three polls:
TieJones +4 Moore +10
This last could be "rally round our embattled hero", could be "don't tell us what to do," could just plain be a bad poll.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 13 November 2017 21:00 (seven years ago)
we're still a month out, I expect polls are gonna be all over the place for awhile
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 21:07 (seven years ago)
Emerson had McMullin winning Utah iirc.
― omar little, Monday, 13 November 2017 21:08 (seven years ago)
SCOOP: Turns out Donald Trump, Jr. corresponded with Wikileaks during the 2016 presidential campaign. My latest. https://t.co/pVGEBqmB9O— Julia Ioffe (@juliaioffe) November 13, 2017
― mookieproof, Monday, 13 November 2017 21:27 (seven years ago)
Thirstyleaks, more like
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Monday, 13 November 2017 21:34 (seven years ago)
HOLY LORD: pic.twitter.com/h6Kf1j6mch— Mr. Fun Guy (@Mister_Fun_Guy) November 13, 2017
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Monday, 13 November 2017 21:37 (seven years ago)
It's like he's the Patient Zero of them all going to jail
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Monday, 13 November 2017 21:38 (seven years ago)
At one point, Trump Jr. accepted a password to a website from them. If he used the password to access the website, that’s a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.— Renato Mariotti (@renato_mariotti) November 13, 2017
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Monday, 13 November 2017 21:40 (seven years ago)
lol that SNL made Jr the smart one in their impressions
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Monday, 13 November 2017 21:41 (seven years ago)
he could very well be the smart one!
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 21:46 (seven years ago)
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 21:48 (seven years ago)
Allred/Moore, his son in further legal jeopardy ... this should really get Pops Trump to freak out.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 21:49 (seven years ago)
what does "accepted" a password mean?
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 13 November 2017 21:50 (seven years ago)
As in, accepted it as a gift. Like, "here's the password!"
Remember the Trump judicial nominee who never tried a case or argued a motion in his brief legal career? It turns out he's married to a White House lawyer and never disclosed it. That explains how he was nominated to a job he's completely unqualified for. https://t.co/spqcMgkmUJ— Renato Mariotti (@renato_mariotti) November 13, 2017
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 21:50 (seven years ago)
“In relation to Mr. Assange: Obama/Clinton placed pressure on Sweden, UK and Australia (his home country) to illicitly go after Mr. Assange. It would be real easy and helpful for your dad to suggest that Australia appoint Assange ambassador to DC.”Wikileaks even imagined how Trump might put it: “‘That’s a real smart tough guy and the most famous australian you have!’ or something similar,” Wikileaks wrote.
Wikileaks even imagined how Trump might put it: “‘That’s a real smart tough guy and the most famous australian you have!’ or something similar,” Wikileaks wrote.
lol ffs
― Number None, Monday, 13 November 2017 21:51 (seven years ago)
That tweet is just incidental, just more bad shit. But when it comes to breaking the law re: this Russia stuff, accepting anything from an enemy or criminal or foreign power - or all those things - is illegal. Stolen emails, passwords, information, anything given as help/a helpful gift, I think.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 21:52 (seven years ago)
I admit I started this month in a slightly different mindset from the one I have now.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 13 November 2017 21:56 (seven years ago)
you can't accept a DM any more than than you can accept a piece of mail. this is some deeply nefarious and incriminating shit, but "accept a password" is innuendo that the article doesn't use and mariotti is better than.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 13 November 2017 21:58 (seven years ago)
jr's reply to the password message doesn't mention the password and there's no evidence he used it.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 13 November 2017 21:59 (seven years ago)
also i think it's going to be hard to demonstrate mens rea in a person with a room temperature IQ:
Back in July, Assange said that he sent this message personally. https://t.co/nkPe67zkdV pic.twitter.com/RzWnpp7Uck— southpaw (@nycsouthpaw) November 13, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 13 November 2017 22:04 (seven years ago)
Based on a number of calls this afternoon, WH is engaged w/ Ivey and McConnell. But everyone waiting on Pres. Trump. Whatever he decides, his circle tells me they want to be ready to make moves re: AL SEN race...— Robert Costa (@costareports) November 13, 2017
... and there is talk about AG Sessions getting in the mix. But not yet something that's moving forward. He's not angling for it and people close to him say he'd only consider the idea if Pres. Trump made the ask. And it's not clear at all what Trump will do re: Alabama/Moore.— Robert Costa (@costareports) November 13, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 13 November 2017 22:09 (seven years ago)
lol what are they going to do - give Sessions his seat back and then voila Trump gets a new AG too? jfc
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 22:14 (seven years ago)
Moore will become the AG
― sleeve, Monday, 13 November 2017 22:18 (seven years ago)
Given the new normal, you know what's going to happen? Doug Jones is going to win, and the senate republicans will find some way to refuse to seat him
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 22:18 (seven years ago)
there is no way Senate Dems would vote to expel Jones, and Senate GOP would need Dem votes to do so
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 22:19 (seven years ago)
I keep waiting for the first Juanita Broaddrick reference
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 November 2017 22:23 (seven years ago)
Gov Ivey to appoint Foghorn Leghorn to replace Moore
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 22:26 (seven years ago)
APPOINT that is
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 November 2017 22:27 (seven years ago)
― sleeve, Monday, 13 November 2017 22:27 (seven years ago)
This guy has found a sense of humor
Straightforward from here:1. McConnell endorses Sessions as write-in candidate for AL Sen.2. Sessions quits as AG to run.3. Sessions wins.4. Trump appoints someone already in Senate-confirmed position as new AG.5. New AG fires Mueller.6. Sen Sessions votes to impeach Trump.— Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) November 13, 2017
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 November 2017 22:28 (seven years ago)
Ha.
I was joking about Jones being expelled, but seriously, what was the rationale for holding the SC seat for 8 months? How did they pull off that heist?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 22:32 (seven years ago)
xpI worry that the first 5 of those things are going to happen
― Dan S, Monday, 13 November 2017 22:32 (seven years ago)
We've now updated the story with @ByronTau's great catch: @realDonaldTrump tweeted about the release of Podesta's emails *15 minutes* after @Wikileaks wrote to @DonaldJTrumpJr about it. https://t.co/pVGEBqmB9O pic.twitter.com/pOszShJ7JY— Julia Ioffe (@juliaioffe) November 13, 2017
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 22:34 (seven years ago)
what was the rationale for holding the SC seat for 8 months? How did they pull off that heist?
they spent all night looking for their senses of shame and dignity, then buried them deep deep underground and never talked about it again
― Karl Malone, Monday, 13 November 2017 22:37 (seven years ago)
It's just that easy.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 22:38 (seven years ago)
i still can't believe they pulled if off so brazenly
― Karl Malone, Monday, 13 November 2017 22:44 (seven years ago)
It's fucking scandalous. Against a backdrop of course of the SC literally gifting the 2000 election to Bush. Did not even wait to count the votes. Would have been bad for stability and trust or something. It's just "let the big dogs eat". Every time.
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 13 November 2017 22:44 (seven years ago)
i kind of felt like the dems and obama acted like pushovers though because they assumed clinton was gonna win
― marcos, Monday, 13 November 2017 22:48 (seven years ago)
just a reminder that the GOP threw their unanimous support behind this guy
https://i.redd.it/ens8yvcohtxz.png
― frogbs, Monday, 13 November 2017 22:50 (seven years ago)
xpostbut by doing so they ceded the right to complain loudly and frequently about what total bullshit it was, esp. after the election. the whole fiasco comes up every once in a while, i maybe see a reference to it around every month or so, in some form or another. if democrats would have done the same to republicans it would have been bigger than #benghazi
― Karl Malone, Monday, 13 November 2017 22:53 (seven years ago)
Sen Richard Shelby R-AL on Roy Moore: "I think he ought to seriously think about dropping out"— Jamie Dupree (@jamiedupree) November 13, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 13 November 2017 22:59 (seven years ago)
Seriously, dude. Seriously.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:02 (seven years ago)
yeah but the will of the voters
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 13 November 2017 23:05 (seven years ago)
Shelby is the first state party guy to turn on him, yeah?
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:09 (seven years ago)
"Hey, Roy, so, uh, do you like to state party?"
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:10 (seven years ago)
The gov turned on him, does she count?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:11 (seven years ago)
Shelby was one of the old boll-weevil conservative Southern Dem politicians - turned (R) after the Gingrich wave election. Presumably this makes him a RINO to half of his audience.
― Doctor Casino, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:13 (seven years ago)
No ped, no cred.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:14 (seven years ago)
The rats are fleeing
.@realDonaldTrump should strike a deal with @SenMajLdr & Roy Moore to replace Moore with AL Rep. Mo Brooks, rock-solid conservative.— Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) November 13, 2017
(Comments are a traet)
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:14 (seven years ago)
A fun day all around for people!
I cannot confirm the alleged DM's from @DonaldJTrumpJr to @WikiLeaks. @WikiLeaks does not keep such records and the Atlantic's presentation is edited and clearly does not have the full context. However, even those published by the Atlantic show that: 1/— Julian Assange 🔹 (@JulianAssange) November 13, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:20 (seven years ago)
did she? I thought she'd been keeping quiet.
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:21 (seven years ago)
Nah, she's made some statements.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:25 (seven years ago)
She's been cagey. Like, the fact that she would even humor then decide against postponing the election implies she knows there's trouble.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:25 (seven years ago)
saying she is "not considering postponing the election" is not exactly a repudiation of Moore, it's an elliptical statement at best
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:27 (seven years ago)
This is going to keep going, isn't it.
Alabama GOP Sen. Richard Shelby on a potential write-in candidate: "A strong one would be Sen. Sessions."— Emma Loop (@LoopEmma) November 13, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:30 (seven years ago)
So if there's a write in campaign, that really favors Jones, right? Divide and conquer?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:32 (seven years ago)
I'm sure Trump loves this idea cuz it would be an opportunity to put Sessions back in the Senate, keep Moore out, and get himself a new AG that he could then pressure to fire Mueller.
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:33 (seven years ago)
a write-in campaign definitely favors Jones - vote-splitting, depressed turnout from the GOP etc.
There's nothing on this ballot besides the Senate seat, right? A write in campaign with no other issue to vote for would keep a lot of people home.
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Monday, 13 November 2017 23:40 (seven years ago)
Yup, just the Senate seat.
And now...
Locals Were Troubled by Roy Moore’s Interactions with Teen Girls at the Gadsden Mall https://t.co/pOBdKR8N5f— andrew kaczynski🤔 (@KFILE) November 13, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:45 (seven years ago)
The person who should step aside is @SenateMajLdr Mitch McConnell. He has failed conservatives and must be replaced. #DrainTheSwamp— Judge Roy Moore (@MooreSenate) November 13, 2017
― omar little, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:47 (seven years ago)
can't imagine him ever backing down, this is just gonna get uglier and uglier. POTUS tweets imminent I assume.
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:51 (seven years ago)
That was from earlier today so who knows.
Meantime, Breitbart's apparently backing away:
Is Bannon about to throw Roy Moore over the cliff? pic.twitter.com/XFNrkAPpQ6— Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) November 13, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:53 (seven years ago)
so he was simultaneously an assistant district attorney AND banned from his local mall for harassing young girls
the mind boggles
― Number None, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:53 (seven years ago)
curiouser and curiouser
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:54 (seven years ago)
time to break outhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uD3bGEFxGC0
Where the skies are so blue
― El Tomboto, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:56 (seven years ago)
Roy Moore's press conference just now, he said of Beverly Young Nelson claims- "This is absolutely false. I never did what she said I did. I don’t even know the woman. I don’t know anything about her. I don’t even know where the restaurant is or was." He did not take questions.— Jack Royer (@JackRoyer) November 13, 2017
― Number None, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:58 (seven years ago)
he signed a lot of teenage girls' yearbooks back then, he can't be expected to remember all of them!
― Οὖτις, Monday, 13 November 2017 23:59 (seven years ago)
I don't even know the woman whose 1977 yearbook I signed affectionately.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 00:00 (seven years ago)
Classic old prosecutor, only what he knows matters. I wonder if he ever won against any firms bigger than four people (or public defenders)
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 00:01 (seven years ago)
And the local Alabama paper just came out with a story with local residents backing up all the allegations against Moore https://t.co/wyy7uHtPDw— Ben Jacobs (@Bencjacobs) November 14, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 00:07 (seven years ago)
how in the world did this asshole's career make it as far as it has?
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 00:10 (seven years ago)
Alabama
― sleeve, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 00:10 (seven years ago)
Big wheels keep on turnin
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 00:11 (seven years ago)
I lol'd
"Now that I've been banned from the mall, I can pursue my true passion, the ten commandments"— The Mountain Goats (@mountain_goats) November 14, 2017
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 00:14 (seven years ago)
Cruz finally caved
"I am not able to urge the people of Alabama to support his candidacy so long as these allegations remain unrefuted," Sen. Cruz said when asked if he pulls his endorsement of Roy Moore.— Marianna Sotomayor (@MariannaNBCNews) November 13, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 00:21 (seven years ago)
That’s a lot of negative modal conditionals.
― .oO (silby), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 00:24 (seven years ago)
Hey, Don Jr.'s on it!
Here is the entire chain of messages with @wikileaks (with my whopping 3 responses) which one of the congressional committees has chosen to selectively leak. How ironic! 1/3 pic.twitter.com/SiwTqWtykA— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) November 14, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 00:25 (seven years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CGyASDjE-U
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 00:30 (seven years ago)
Please no pullouts or withdrawing or non-seating or appointee switcheroos or delaying the election or any of that.
Josh has it right.
1. Election goes forward as planned. 2. Moore stays in. 3. Some people advocate Strange as the write-in candidate. 4. Some people advocate Sessions as the write-in candidate. 5. Some people advocate Brooks as the write-in candidate. 6. Some people advocate circling the wagons and staying with Moore (to stick it to the establishment).
Republicans then fail to coalesce around any of those options, and: Senator Doug Jones (D-AL).
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 00:33 (seven years ago)
Montgomery Advertiser, Oct. 13, 2002. Guess some of these people finally started talking. pic.twitter.com/9Psc2iThdz— Timothy Burke (@bubbaprog) November 14, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 00:40 (seven years ago)
Of course he's from a place called fucking Gallant.
― nashwan, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 00:47 (seven years ago)
Yeah, but he went to school in Goofus.
― pplains, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:13 (seven years ago)
Meanwhile: treason!
Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) said Monday that he would support the Democratic candidate in the Alabama Senate special election over GOP candidate Roy Moore.
"If this choice is between Roy Moore and a Democrat, a Democrat,” Flake told reporters Monday in response to a question about who he would support. “For sure.”
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:21 (seven years ago)
Flake already has a target on his back so why not keep going?
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:26 (seven years ago)
It's getting good.
LOL. Anderson Cooper breaks into the telecast to show live footage of Pence throwing Don Jr under a bus. pic.twitter.com/ASw1SzmPfQ— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) November 14, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:31 (seven years ago)
yeah, there were two fascinating development, today
The Nelson interview and the explosion it's caused.
The circling noose for Donald Jr. and the written revelation of just how sleazy and frightening Wikileaks is
― Dan S, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:37 (seven years ago)
mike pence does not seem very bright
― brimstead, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:38 (seven years ago)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/sessions-considering-second-special-counsel-to-investigate-republican-concerns-letter-shows/2017/11/13/bc92ef3c-c8d2-11e7-b0cf-7689a9f2d84e_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_justiceletter-815pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:41 (seven years ago)
8 months ago...
I asked for their candid and honest opinion about what I should do about investigations, certain investigations. And my staff recommended recusal. They said that since I had involvement with the campaign, I should not be involved in any campaign investigation. I have studied the rules and considered their comments and evaluation. I believe those recommendations are right and just.Therefore, I have recused myself in the matters that deal with the Trump campaign. The exact language of that recusal is in the press release that we — we will give to you. I've said this, quote, “I have now decided to recuse myself from any existing or future investigations of any matter relating in any way to the campaigns for president of the United States.”
Therefore, I have recused myself in the matters that deal with the Trump campaign. The exact language of that recusal is in the press release that we — we will give to you. I've said this, quote, “I have now decided to recuse myself from any existing or future investigations of any matter relating in any way to the campaigns for president of the United States.”
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:42 (seven years ago)
are they gonna appoint that 36 year old shit for brains thats never argued a motion in court to be special counsel of benghazi 3.0
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:45 (seven years ago)
Why are you all acting like this is some big deal? No one can remember what they said in a press release eight months earlier. And that was all so long ago that there's no reason to think it still applies or even ought to apply in this case. Remember, this man is the Attorney General of the United States, and I think he would know what is right and what isn't. /sarah_huckabee_sanders_mode
― A is for (Aimless), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:50 (seven years ago)
back to the trump jr/wikilieaks DMs: while I don't think they're evidence that trump jr did anything illegal wrt to the CFAA, they are an admission of guilt by wikileaks.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:53 (seven years ago)
https://cdn1.nyt.com/images/2017/03/19/fashion/19DONJRJP1/19DONJRJP1-superJumbo.jpg
― attention vampire (MatthewK), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:55 (seven years ago)
thinking baout things
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:59 (seven years ago)
"He's a jar, with a heavy lid"
― The Harsh Tutelage of Michael McDonald (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 01:59 (seven years ago)
― Dan S, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:01 (seven years ago)
i spent the last seven minutes staring at that picture while listening to this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AWIqXzvX-U
― crüt, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:05 (seven years ago)
2nd lol
― Dan S, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:11 (seven years ago)
https://i.imgur.com/dmx1WQR.jpg
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:21 (seven years ago)
hahaha!
― Dan S, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:26 (seven years ago)
Ha, the best.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:26 (seven years ago)
it's kind of weird but i wouldn't mind having a 1960s-sized GI Joe version of Trump Jr
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:28 (seven years ago)
or just a pez dispenser version, whatever
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:29 (seven years ago)
Pretty sure DJTJ is a pez dispenser.
Anyway, it's only fair that if there is a special prosecutor looking into the Trump campaign for proof they conspired with Russia to rig the election, among other things, that there should be another special something looking into Not President Clinton for something that would have looked bad had she been elected president, except she wasn't, because people already assumed the worst of her, which may or may not be true, but hey, she's not president, and anyway, now the Russians have nukes and she is rich! But not as rich as the current president and his cronies, who got everything they have through honest means, which is why that should not be looked into.
Also, they should look into Obama, too. Just because. I heard he secretly smokes and he might have acknowledged some drug use in some book once. Someone should read that, stat.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:30 (seven years ago)
Literally under a cloud.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:31 (seven years ago)
Re: this nob, hmm, strange that wikileaks claims it has no copies of the emails, but DJTJ, for some reason, kept his. And I'm sure he kept all of them, right, and made sure to turn them over as promised? I mean, if he says he only responded a couple of times then he must be telling the truth. Besides, how could he have anything to hide? He's putting everything out there proactively, just like the secret wikileaks messages that were just leaked out had secretly suggested he do before. Nothing suspicious about that at all.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:34 (seven years ago)
Didn't Two Scoops promise/threaten to make some big announcement tomorrow? Because who cares, once again anything he has to say will be lost in the shuffle of all this shit.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:36 (seven years ago)
You're funny!What's truly ironic is that you're complaining about leaks. This was you 13 months ago. pic.twitter.com/WoT5pKE5Cl— Pé Resists (@4everNeverTrump) November 14, 2017
Also, here's your dad tweeting just after Wikileaks reached out to you on Oct 12, 2016 talking about how the press is "missing" stories.Notice the similar complaint from your dad? pic.twitter.com/13WMdXyJk3— Pé Resists (@4everNeverTrump) November 14, 2017
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:39 (seven years ago)
I liked the last tweet from that guy in the same string
"You guys were willfully conspiring with Wikileaks, which you knew was releasing emails hacked by Russia. You guys are guilty as fuck.
Fuck you. And fuck your dad."
― Dan S, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:45 (seven years ago)
strange that wikileaks claims it has no copies of the emails
they needed the space, for all of the things, that they leak
― j., Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:48 (seven years ago)
man, Shaun King has gone full Morbius today with his non stop Bill Clinton criticism. Like, there are more relevant fish to fry. time to stop following.
― akm, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:50 (seven years ago)
I unfollowed King last week when he was the one and only person in my feed defending Donna Brazile after she displaced Greenwald as Tucker Carlson's new favorite guest.
― Moodles, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:54 (seven years ago)
gone full Intercept
― akm, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:58 (seven years ago)
you guys have great criteria, gives me hope for the future, all 2 years of it.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 03:11 (seven years ago)
criteria?? more like great bacteria!
― ian, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 03:18 (seven years ago)
looks like we're gonna get to relive the 90s
As gross and cynical and hypocrtical as the right's "what about Bill Clinton" stuff is, it's also true that Democrats and the center left are overdue for a real reckoning with the allegations against him.— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) November 10, 2017
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 03:25 (seven years ago)
I am 100% in support of making Bill Clinton's final years hell, fwiw
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 03:27 (seven years ago)
same tbh
― Simon H., Tuesday, 14 November 2017 03:29 (seven years ago)
Eyes on the ball ppl
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 03:29 (seven years ago)
My bubba antipathy is well documented but there are more important things to devote our energy to at the moment
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 03:30 (seven years ago)
down with all the creeps imho
― Simon H., Tuesday, 14 November 2017 03:30 (seven years ago)
lots can be done at the same time iirc
― Simon H., Tuesday, 14 November 2017 03:31 (seven years ago)
https://i.imgur.com/6BSz0g8.jpg
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 03:40 (seven years ago)
mvp work km
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 04:48 (seven years ago)
I like how the source mentioned by Wikileaks in the messages to DJTJr is "putintrump.org" which could be parsed "put in Trump" or "Putin Trump".
― attention vampire (MatthewK), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 05:12 (seven years ago)
(obv it's the latter but to Donnie Jr it could have seemed like the former)
― attention vampire (MatthewK), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 05:36 (seven years ago)
Damn KM on fire here
― Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 08:28 (seven years ago)
It's a subtle tribute to
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LV1_s73fI-U
xpost to MatthewK
― Choco Blavatsky (seandalai), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 09:03 (seven years ago)
One of the most accurate polls last time around. But #FakeNews likes to say we’re in the 30’s. They are wrong. Some people think numbers could be in the 50's. Together, WE will MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! pic.twitter.com/YhrwkdObhP— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 14, 2017
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 13:23 (seven years ago)
Some people think we're closer to 100, aka Putin numbers.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 13:28 (seven years ago)
"Some people think numbers could be in the 50's"
This really is how he thinks isn't it? It's not the actual number that researcher, y'know, come up with through research. No, if there's a John Doe in the street who'll say "but I believe the approval rate could be in the 50s!" that seals the deal. This guy.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 13:29 (seven years ago)
i wonder if his staffers spent the asia trip desperately keeping him from learning about the moore situation, and now that he's back they're still trying to pump him up with flattering news in case he finally turns on the tv and sees it
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 13:30 (seven years ago)
btw that same rasmussen poll has his disapproval rating at 53%
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 13:32 (seven years ago)
some people say disapproval could be even higher.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 13:35 (seven years ago)
rasmussen, the classic unbiased poll, has most people hating me, wonderful stuff
― Clay, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 13:43 (seven years ago)
Also, 30s and 50s shouldn't be possessive - I fucking hate when people do that (and they usually do it for decades, too, which is also wrong).
― grawlix (unperson), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 13:43 (seven years ago)
Some people think Trump's approval could even be somewhere in the 1000s.
Sorry, the 1000's.
― Home of the Ill-Considered Gravy Spigot (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 13:54 (seven years ago)
over 9000 iirc
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 13:55 (seven years ago)
Some people think.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 13:55 (seven years ago)
Some people don't think.
Some people stink.
I'm 46% so why try harder
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 13:58 (seven years ago)
Given that Trump's reference to the always mysteriously-unattributed 'some people' very transparently means 'the people who exist solely in the mind of Donald Trump', what does it say about his sense of self-worth at this point that he can't even confidently muster the support of 50% of the voices in his head?
― Home of the Ill-Considered Gravy Spigot (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 14:00 (seven years ago)
well, he wouldn't want to make it sound implausible.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 14:06 (seven years ago)
it's like a kid changing a grade from an F to a c minus.
Remember the Trump judicial nominee who has never tried a case or argued a motion, and didn’t disclose that he’s married to a White House lawyer? He spent a year as a paranormal investigator. You can’t make this stuff up. https://t.co/63kDNqvDy7— Renato Mariotti (@renato_mariotti) November 14, 2017
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 14:22 (seven years ago)
Bragging about Rasmussen putting you at 46% is pretty sad
― frogbs, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 14:35 (seven years ago)
Deja Vu though. Didn't he do this already once?
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 14:39 (seven years ago)
https://plnami.blob.core.windows.net/media/2017/06/rasmussen.jpg
― Home of the Ill-Considered Gravy Spigot (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 14:46 (seven years ago)
Truly a cause for celebration.
― Home of the Ill-Considered Gravy Spigot (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 14:47 (seven years ago)
"1 days since an employee was indicted for treason"
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 15:29 (seven years ago)
not a lot of people know this, but a lot of people are saying that the fake news won't tell you that no president has ever been approved by more than half of the population
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 15:34 (seven years ago)
Nobody knows it, but everybody's saying it.
That's actually not a bad summation of this particular moment in time.
― Home of the Ill-Considered Gravy Spigot (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 15:40 (seven years ago)
of course I was right about the yearbook and the ink
it's different frickin' ink. She probably had a schoolmate named Roy who signed that and they added in the rest of it. From the front it all looks black, but from the side it becomes more obvious. Super disgusted with how sloppy this hitjob is. pic.twitter.com/0mvmC86B1e— That One Guy (@villagemediocre) November 14, 2017
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 15:48 (seven years ago)
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/its-getting-bad-folks
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 15:49 (seven years ago)
Next thread title plz
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 15:49 (seven years ago)
agreed
― sleeve, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 15:51 (seven years ago)
thirded
xposts this is getting into some Nigeria-level politically motivated "investigations" shiz
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 15:53 (seven years ago)
― lefal junglist platton (wtev), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 16:25 (seven years ago)
please god, please don't let trump figure out what margin of error means in a poll
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 16:26 (seven years ago)
The great thing about twitter is that you don't have to bother with margins like you do in Word. So no need to worry about error messages when printing or posting.
― lefal junglist platton (wtev), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 16:30 (seven years ago)
so how much has Jeff Session forgotten today ?
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 16:39 (seven years ago)
jim jordan (R-OH) is the worst
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 16:40 (seven years ago)
“Mr. Sessions, according to your sworn testimony, you’ve forgotten: • A meeting w/ Donald Trump where George Papadopoulos broached a Trump-Putin meeting, • A meeting w/ Carter Page about Page traveling to Russia, and• 2 meetings you yourself had w/ the Russian ambassador.” https://t.co/k8l4oTIM80— southpaw (@nycsouthpaw) November 14, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 16:49 (seven years ago)
Countdown to the right-wing attack on the concept of remembering things.
― Home of the Ill-Considered Gravy Spigot (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 16:58 (seven years ago)
Thanks to @VICE & @AlxThomp for visualizing our data on women candidates in 2018 compared to previous cycles. Pretty striking, eh? https://t.co/N1rM1d0ien #election2018 pic.twitter.com/UK4GQs0XHs— CAWP (@CAWP_RU) November 14, 2017
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 17:08 (seven years ago)
how much of that is democrats running in previously uncontested seats (i.e. more women candidates because more candidates)?
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 17:14 (seven years ago)
do congressional seats go uncontested for that matter?
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 17:15 (seven years ago)
All the time. There were a large number of districts that Hillary won where the Dems didn't run anyone for the House.
― louise ck (milo z), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 17:22 (seven years ago)
i'm not sure. in 2016, there were apparently 53 districts with uncontested elections, with 28 held by republicans and 25 by democrats (https://www.brennancenter.org/blog/three-things-we-already-know-about-2016-us-house-races).
so not a trivial amount, but not enough to account for the big increase in democratic female candidates over the last few years.
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 17:26 (seven years ago)
and only one district in the country that Clinton won that had no Democratic candidate (Texas’ 32nd).
― by the light of the burning Citroën, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 17:31 (seven years ago)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/11/14/duterte-spokesman-trump-offered-to-return-philippines-fugitive-during-bilateral-talks
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 17:32 (seven years ago)
(THREAD) This thread provides live updates on any newsworthy events in Attorney General Sessions' public testimony before Congress today. I hope you'll follow along and share this tweet. pic.twitter.com/XgNOoI647g— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) November 14, 2017
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 17:37 (seven years ago)
HOWDY FOLKS
― omar little, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 17:37 (seven years ago)
it's me, the lying racist guy who is beloved by senate colleagues!
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 17:40 (seven years ago)
welcome back my friendsto the Sessions that never ends
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 17:41 (seven years ago)
Knew nothing ofCan't rememberDon't recallDidn't talk withWas never toldCan't revealDon't understand... Parklife!
― Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 17:49 (seven years ago)
Jeff Sessions Recalls Parts Of Meeting After Examining Tattoo Clue Trail He Left On His Body. pic.twitter.com/q5YfV7CLn0— Jesse McLaren (@McJesse) November 14, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 17:52 (seven years ago)
I quickly scanned and misread the text of that tweet as having something to do with Sessions's treasure trail and I'm still barfing.
― Home of the Ill-Considered Gravy Spigot (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 18:08 (seven years ago)
"those aren't breadcrumbs"
― omar little, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 18:10 (seven years ago)
https://www.buzzfeed.com/jasonleopold/secret-finding-60-russian-payments-to-finance-election?utm_term=.fym7BG8Pb#.icBPnKW7D
― gbx, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 18:15 (seven years ago)
It's OK to spike the piece when you get the explanation for why it's not newsworthy pic.twitter.com/piyMzlTuOl— Tom Scocca (@tomscocca) November 14, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 19:00 (seven years ago)
yeah that's some bad journalism there
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 19:00 (seven years ago)
ah well
― gbx, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 19:36 (seven years ago)
I am just happy the FBI is investigating the Russian money transfers. No doubt, they'll do their usual impeccable job, as seen on TV.
― A is for (Aimless), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 19:39 (seven years ago)
watching this sessions hearing
rep jayapal from washington is pretty fucking awesome
― marcos, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 19:44 (seven years ago)
(or, knowing nothing about her other than these hearings, she seems awesome)
One of our IL reps told him we could solve all these problems and save tons of time and money if the Dems and Republicans simply demanded the resignations of both Clinton and Trump.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 19:48 (seven years ago)
watching this sessions hearingrep jayapal from washington is pretty fucking awesome
― .oO (silby), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 19:53 (seven years ago)
Oh hey, look, senate GOP just added ACA mandate repeal to its tax bill.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 19:58 (seven years ago)
This is awesome: passing the R tax cut would REQUIRE an immediate https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/9305205696610222095 billion cut in Medicare, plus 11 billion in other cuts (which isn't legally possible). I.e., the whole exercise is illegal under Congress' own rules https://t.co/6m1g79Dn5m— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) November 14, 2017
I don't entirely get this ... "illegal" meaning, lawsuits/the Supreme Court will strike it down?
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 20:00 (seven years ago)
lol this is gonna go down in flames isn't it
and i just attached an anvil to my scuba tank, hope it works out
― bodak horseman (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 20:01 (seven years ago)
looking forward to the "lock her up" amendment
― sleeve, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 20:02 (seven years ago)
they really don't wanna pass anything
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 20:10 (seven years ago)
The idea that they would basically cripple the ACA while at the same time raising taxes for millions of constituents, all while permanently easing up on corporations and rich people ... it's like they're trying to do the maximum worst thing.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 20:14 (seven years ago)
Could be that knowing they have no chance of passing something, they are going all-in on greed to show their donors that they still have their heads in the game.
― Moodles, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 20:17 (seven years ago)
it seems like both bills are going to pass their respective chambers - it's the conference committee bill that's going to run into problems.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 20:19 (seven years ago)
The idea that repealing the ACA mandate while leaving the rest of the law intact could do anything but create chaos and collapse in the US medical system is madness. It's not just pandering, but pandering in the stupidest possible way to people whose ignorance about how things work is immeasurable.
― A is for (Aimless), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 20:19 (seven years ago)
How are they passing something in the Senate? They haven't found a way to satisfy reconciliation rules.
― Moodles, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 20:21 (seven years ago)
She is my rep! I love her and I’m so proud we elected her.― .oO (silby), Tuesday, November 14, 2017 2:53 PM (twenty-eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
oh nice!
― marcos, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 20:22 (seven years ago)
Sounds like somebody did not get the "nothing matters anymore" memo.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 20:39 (seven years ago)
They haven't found a way to satisfy reconciliation rules.
Then the dems need to be making parliamentary procedure objections right and left. This may not sound very effective, but throwing out parliamentary procedure would be much more radical than killing the filibuster.
― A is for (Aimless), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 20:43 (seven years ago)
I mean, things matter if you want to actually pass something. And the GOP absolutely needs to pass this or all hell is going to break loose with their donors. If this bill isn't completely awful I think it'll pass. But god damn do they seem to be trying to make this thing go down in flames.
― frogbs, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 20:48 (seven years ago)
what will GOP donors do when they realize that the people they installed are ineffectual jackholes?
― bodak horseman (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 20:58 (seven years ago)
GOP working hard to get their only piece of legislation to run on in 2018 from a high 20s approval rating to the high teens. These guys are fucking morons.
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 21:01 (seven years ago)
Ted Lieu to Sessions: "Either you're lying to the U.S. Senate, or you're lying to U.S. House of Representatives." pic.twitter.com/nh8d0ORUN7— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) November 14, 2017
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 21:11 (seven years ago)
GOP working hard to get their only piece of legislation to run on in 2018 from a high 20s approval rating to the high teens.
last poll I saw had tax bill support in the high 40s iirc
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 21:13 (seven years ago)
XP "Maybe I lied to BOTH! Yeah, that's the ticket!"
― to fly across the city and find Aerosmith's car (C. Grisso/McCain), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 21:14 (seven years ago)
sessions accidentally blurted out the truth at the end of that clip:
"...so uh, i's just, uh, my response, um, and i'm sorry, that, um, that's my response."
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 21:29 (seven years ago)
IMPORTANT UPDATE: Here, care of Rep. Louie Gohmert's office, is the full chart he displayed at today's House Judiciary Committee oversight hearing. pic.twitter.com/dPSHtGvwqK— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner) November 14, 2017
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 21:54 (seven years ago)
where are the Reverse Vampires
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 21:55 (seven years ago)
https://i.imgur.com/UaLpJOK.jpg
― frogbs, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 21:57 (seven years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/0ZnWnAS.giflol xp
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 21:58 (seven years ago)
sometimes I think that is the one joke the show should be remembered for
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 21:58 (seven years ago)
CAROL! CAROL!
― bodak horseman (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 21:58 (seven years ago)
god they get so much mileage out of that tarmac meeting
― omar little, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:02 (seven years ago)
i know it is amazing
― marcos, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:03 (seven years ago)
TIL Glenn Beck is working in Louie Gohmert's office generating charts
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:03 (seven years ago)
I like all the drop shadow
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:05 (seven years ago)
this is a talk radio bingo card.
― new noise, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:07 (seven years ago)
looks like there's no direct link from Hillary to Benghazi. you just owned yourself, GOP.
― omar little, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:09 (seven years ago)
Someone should do one of those for the Trump administration and then just connect it all into one giant cool map.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:09 (seven years ago)
https://www.collegemagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/school-of-rock.jpg
Goddamit.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:10 (seven years ago)
http://latimesherocomplex.files.wordpress.com/2013/07/1supergraphicp12.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:11 (seven years ago)
http://www.chartvalley.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/best-of-printable-cool-flow-charts-cool-flow-charts-cool-flow-chart-template-cool-flow-chart-maker-cool-flow.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:12 (seven years ago)
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/14/senate-gop-obamacare-mandate-repeal-to-tax-bill-244891
all GOP Senators on-board (including McCain, Paul, and probably Collins), improves the math, and doesn't pose any reconciliation issues, so idg why people are acting like this is something that damages the bill's chances for passage. The House will love it too.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:15 (seven years ago)
opposition to the bill is lukewarm, and adding a healthcare provision might light a fire under the concerned citizens who call congressmen.
― bodak horseman (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:22 (seven years ago)
which will sway whose vote
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:23 (seven years ago)
Corker and Flake are retiring, McCain's about to die, Paul is an asshole... I guess Collins and Murkowski maybe
Collins still sounds like he's hesitating, but caviling wouldn't surprise me.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:26 (seven years ago)
Worth noting
A senior House GOP leadership aide tells NBC News the House does NOT plan to include the individual mandate repeal in the House tax plan being voted on Thursday.— Alex Moe (@AlexNBCNews) November 14, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:31 (seven years ago)
Coal CEO who retaliated against worker for reporting sexual harassment and unsafe conditions will now be the country's top mine regulator. Four mining deaths occurred under his watch. https://t.co/cFmOvX3Qxl https://t.co/6DMxzysfX3— sean. (@SeanMcElwee) November 14, 2017
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:41 (seven years ago)
A senior House GOP leadership aide tells NBC News the House does NOT plan to include the individual mandate repeal in the House tax plan being voted on Thursday.
this doesn't say it's because no one will vote for it though
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:47 (seven years ago)
Rather.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:48 (seven years ago)
BREAKING: RNC withdraws support for Roy Moore. Story tk...— Alex Isenstadt (@politicoalex) November 14, 2017
NEW: Roy Moore has informed his campaign staff he intends to see his race through, @TomLlamasABC reports.— Evan McMurry (@evanmcmurry) November 14, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:49 (seven years ago)
yesssss do it Roy
― frogbs, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:50 (seven years ago)
go go go
https://thumbs.gfycat.com/DisastrousSpanishHectorsdolphin-max-1mb.gif
― omar little, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:53 (seven years ago)
@meridithmcgrawWow: There's a fake, mysterious robocall in Alabama out there from someone falsely claiming to be 'Bernie Bernstein,' a reporter from the Washington Post, seeking 'damaging' info on Roy Moore for $
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:54 (seven years ago)
there was a post upthread somewhere abt how Moore would never ever back down from defending his losing positions in law school, totally in character
― sleeve, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:54 (seven years ago)
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/NeSwcSP_z4M/maxresdefault.jpg
― nickn, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:58 (seven years ago)
Sorry GOP, you'll have to carry the unplanned scandals of Moore to term.
― to fly across the city and find Aerosmith's car (C. Grisso/McCain), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 22:59 (seven years ago)
Why in the world would Moore drop out?
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 23:02 (seven years ago)
someone falsely claiming to be 'Bernie Bernstein,'
[[[Bernie Bernstein]]], you mean.
God, I hate people.
― bodak horseman (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 23:05 (seven years ago)
Jewey Jewstein from the Washington Post.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 23:06 (seven years ago)
Josh is right. Moore's situation is win-win: either he becomes a senator in spite of the forces arrayed against him, or he is a celebrated martyr to his adoring fans. STABBED IN THE BACK by the treacherous establishment GOP and the Democrat media.
Either way, speaking engagements forever, and enhanced status in the eyes of the crazies.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 23:06 (seven years ago)
Moore gonna go out like Rhodes in Day of the Dead. 'CHOKE ON EM! CHOKE ON EM!' And likely setting a precedent for many republicans to follow.
― Home of the Ill-Considered Gravy Spigot (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 23:08 (seven years ago)
or he is a celebrated martyr to his adoring fans. STABBED IN THE BACK by the treacherous establishment GOP and the Democrat media.
it'll be interesting to see how that goes down, if he loses, because it might resemble the reaction when trump goes down (via election, primary, or otherwise)
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 23:15 (seven years ago)
eh I don't know -- looking at this scenario with a cold cynical eye, the Dems have another donkey on which to pin GOP malfeasance, as they did in 2006 and 2008.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 23:39 (seven years ago)
This seems like a very Dubya-era thing to do:
“Cards Against Humanity buys piece of the U.S. border so Trump can't build his wall”
http://mashable.com/2017/11/14/cards-against-humanity-saves-america-border-wall/#plwHk2yvoaqp
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 23:41 (seven years ago)
pfft that's what eminent domain is for, good PR though
― sleeve, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 23:43 (seven years ago)
Yeah, that’s the thing; it’s PR and only PR
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Tuesday, 14 November 2017 23:46 (seven years ago)
lol did jeet heer just retweet you josh
― mark s, Tuesday, 14 November 2017 23:51 (seven years ago)
me? who is Jeet?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 00:05 (seven years ago)
haha, just saw that. Funny.
who is jeet, he says!!!
― gbx, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 00:09 (seven years ago)
he's twitter's josh in chicago
― mark s, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 00:09 (seven years ago)
"Who is Jeet" is all time. <3 u JiC :D
― Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 00:16 (seven years ago)
From now on I’m 100% believing that JiC writes for The Nation Similar to the way DJP is on staff with The Times of Israel
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 00:30 (seven years ago)
Roy Moore's wife Kayla was a classmate of accuser Beverly Young Nelson: https://t.co/EKgnER07BE— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) November 15, 2017
no idea if this is true but if so i mean O_O
― gbx, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 00:31 (seven years ago)
Relevant story
http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/11/when_did_roy_moore_meet_his_wi.html
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 00:49 (seven years ago)
Mo Brooks runs away from questions about Roy Moore, but with Yakety Sax pic.twitter.com/zI1CXPGPjW— Josh Billinson (@jbillinson) November 14, 2017
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and bet Trump tweets/encourages Moore to stay in the race and win
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 01:09 (seven years ago)
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 01:11 (seven years ago)
holy shit, i was about to lamejoke "it's missing #benghazi", but then i saw it
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 01:12 (seven years ago)
Thread of Missing #Benghazi
― to fly across the city and find Aerosmith's car (C. Grisso/McCain), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 01:19 (seven years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOpBAPeVQAE_iWh?format=jpg&name=large
― marcos, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 02:59 (seven years ago)
Oh I love it when they do the throwbacks.
https://i.imgur.com/V8s1Kea.jpg
― pplains, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 03:19 (seven years ago)
Sean Hannity breaking with Roy Moore: "For me, the judge has 24 hours. You must immediately and fully come up with a satisfactory explanation for your inconsistencies... You must remove any doubt. If you can't do this, then Judge Moore needs to get out of this race."— Brian Stelter (@brianstelter) November 15, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 03:20 (seven years ago)
Someone tell me that The Hill has turned into a satire site: http://thehill.com/homenews/media/360346-limbaugh-moore-was-a-democrat-at-time-of-sexual-misconduct-allegations
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 03:55 (seven years ago)
The Hill has gone full Detective Friday in its dry coverage of our all-day-err-day WTF. I never used to keep them in an open tab, but I have done so for the last several months. It's like Gawker on Mars.
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 04:30 (seven years ago)
hey everybody it's time to stop talking about the Alabama mallcreeper and start talking about the shitshow that is the Senate tax bill / Obamacare backstab
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 04:30 (seven years ago)
I wonder who they are placating by allowing that ACA mandate repeal to bet tacked on? The fact that the House hasn't added it suggests that this was designed to be eliminated in conference committee, and since the House is usually the crazier body, it appears this was a favor by McConnell and Ryan to some senator(s) who felt it would help them for it to be there.
The big question is will the bill even get passed by the senate so it can get as far as conference committee. This is just weird stuff that's hard to read. Why would the three dissenting senators on the ACA replacement bills vote for this? (Hmmm. Do I smell a McCain about to pull a McCain on us?)
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 05:54 (seven years ago)
They're all going to vote for it
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 06:34 (seven years ago)
This clip pretty clearly lays out the logic behind the Republican tax plan
Does the #GOPTaxPlan treat corporations & individuals the same in terms of who gets to keep deductions & who doesn’t? Nope, not even close. pic.twitter.com/2h2iQzqXl0— Rep. Suzan DelBene (@RepDelBene) November 6, 2017
― Moodles, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 06:44 (seven years ago)
wow
― Dan S, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 06:59 (seven years ago)
those questions (and answers) couldn't be any more on point
― Dan S, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 07:45 (seven years ago)
gilded age not gilded enough!
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 10:35 (seven years ago)
Jonah!
I was going to do this as a column for tomorrow, but since Shep beat me to the punch I’ll do it as a Corner post. Shep is right. The Uranium One story is crap.
Just for kicks, though, he has no problem with DOJ investigating Clinton.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 14:40 (seven years ago)
While in the Philippines I was forced to watch @CNN, which I have not done in months, and again realized how bad, and FAKE, it is. Loser!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 15, 2017
― Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 14:50 (seven years ago)
https://notesfromachair.files.wordpress.com/2014/06/watching-a-lot-of-tv.jpg
― bodak horseman (voodoo chili), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 15:04 (seven years ago)
Imagining Duterte strapping Trump into a chair and subjecting him to hours of CNN Ludovico style. 'Forced'. And what the fuck is that errant 'Loser!' about?! This person would be rightfully ignored as a senile lunatic in any other sphere.
― Home of the Ill-Considered Gravy Spigot (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 15:08 (seven years ago)
Do you think the three UCLA Basketball Players will say thank you President Trump? They were headed for 10 years in jail!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 15, 2017
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 15:18 (seven years ago)
they should tell him to fuck off. what's he gonna do, send them back to chinese jail?
― bodak horseman (voodoo chili), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 15:21 (seven years ago)
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2017/11/14/1715575/-A-OK-in-Oklahoma-Democrats-flip-their-14th-special-election-from-red-to-blue-on-Tuesday
Tuesday’s flip was in Senate District 37, a seat just west of Tulsa that went 67-27 for Donald Trump in 2016 and 69-31 for Mitt Romney in 2012. Last fall, Democrats spent $200,000 to try to win this seat, only to lose to the GOP by 15 points. This time, Democrat Allison Ikley-Freeman, a therapist at a non-profit community mental health agency who campaigned on ending Oklahoma’s education crisis and expanding access to health care, won 50.3 to 49.7—performing 40 points better than the presidential results just a year ago to secure this victory.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 15:22 (seven years ago)
Based on that video linked upthread, I’m going to have to give some coin to Rep. Suzan DelBene.
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 15:32 (seven years ago)
Do you think the three UCLA Basketball Players will say thank you President Trump?
why are Those Black People never sufficiently grateful
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 15:44 (seven years ago)
One might even call them... uppity
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 15:49 (seven years ago)
Democratic New Mexico State Auditor Tim Keller has wrestled control of New Mexico's largest city from the GOP to become Albuquerque's next mayor.Unofficial results show Keller beating Republican Albuquerque City Councilor Dan Lewis with 62 percent of the vote compared to 38 percent on Tuesday.Both were seeking to replace Republican Albuquerque Mayor Richard Berry, who opted not to run for re-election after eight years.
Unofficial results show Keller beating Republican Albuquerque City Councilor Dan Lewis with 62 percent of the vote compared to 38 percent on Tuesday.
Both were seeking to replace Republican Albuquerque Mayor Richard Berry, who opted not to run for re-election after eight years.
Tbf, New Mexico was already bluer than I thought, with two dem senators, but the trend defined last Tuesday seems to be undeniable.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 16:13 (seven years ago)
Quite a Drudge headline pic.twitter.com/vO9M2VANXw— Will Sommer (@willsommer) November 15, 2017
drudge added a question mark to this headline since the tweet was posted
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 16:36 (seven years ago)
The vocabulary here is the definition of 'getting high off your own supply'
Moore from source close to Bannon: “Mitch McConnell and his pack of liars have failed America and must step out of the way for new strong Republican leadership. The people of Alabama are too smart to be fooled by McConnell and his fake news locusts at swamp papers.” https://t.co/7AHOo48DOX— Steve Deace (@SteveDeaceShow) November 15, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 16:52 (seven years ago)
Fake News Locusts a great band name.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 16:56 (seven years ago)
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, November 15, 2017 10:13 AM (forty-five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
i'm still new to NM but i think it's a pretty liberal state in general, at least compared to all its neighbors
― gbx, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 17:01 (seven years ago)
they have a GOP governor, but she's term limited--a very nice opportunity for the Dems to gain a governorship in 2018
― bodak horseman (voodoo chili), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 17:03 (seven years ago)
🐦[Quite a Drudge headline pic.twitter.com/vO9M2VANXw🕸— Will Sommer (@willsommer) November 15, 2017🕸]🐦drudge added a question mark to this headline since the tweet was posted
― wow. that was truly the minecraft of sex. (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 17:03 (seven years ago)
"fake news locusts at swamp papers"!
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 17:06 (seven years ago)
sounds like a Frank Deck rant
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 17:11 (seven years ago)
This must be a rough time for those who aspire to the status of 'worst imaginable public figure', but god bless those who are truly giving it their all amid such intense competition.
― Home of the Ill-Considered Gravy Spigot (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 17:11 (seven years ago)
it's the new golden age of worst imaginable public figures
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 17:25 (seven years ago)
xpost And I want to say the NM GOP Gov was mostly a reaction to former Gov Bill Richardson and his perceived (real?) corruption.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 17:27 (seven years ago)
New Quinnipiac poll:Only 25% approve of the GOP tax plan.Only 16% (!) think the GOP plan will reduce their taxes.61% say it will benefit the wealthy most; only 24% say it will help middle class the most. pic.twitter.com/EYofMxkiI5— Greg Sargent (@ThePlumLineGS) November 15, 2017
great tax bill eveyrone, lets win in 2018.
this is a fucking suicide pact.
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 17:27 (seven years ago)
Supposedly a rising star on the conservative side:
Wes Goodman - former top staffer for Jim Jordan and Heritage - resigns from Ohio state house over "inappropriate behavior" https://t.co/SjBgBN4Lmt— Betsy Woodruff (@woodruffbets) November 15, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 17:32 (seven years ago)
Someone’s not getting a 401(k) match this year... https://t.co/1n4Cu5os3x— Downtown Josh Brown (@ReformedBroker) November 15, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 18:19 (seven years ago)
In unrelated news: Christian Bale is Cheney-ing along at a decent clip
christian bale looks like a chef in a food magazine talking abt how his love of cooking helped him kick his drug addiction pic.twitter.com/mkJwwRCfJO— KRANG T. NELSON (@KrangTNelson) November 15, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 18:33 (seven years ago)
???? what thread is this
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 18:40 (seven years ago)
this is the "kingfish posts random shit" thread
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 18:41 (seven years ago)
unfunny krang tweets are policy now, i got it
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 18:43 (seven years ago)
Hey now, attempts at congealing a biopic form of Cheney is massively relevant in a year where no shortage of Dubya-Era scumfucks are being rehabilitated by panicky media scribes casting about for something
Ashcroft/Rumsfeld (re)evaluative pieces are a-comin’, just wait
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 18:50 (seven years ago)
are there any genuine attempts being made to rehabilitate those fucks? I haven't seen any.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 18:54 (seven years ago)
There were a fair number of "at least Dubya had dignity" tweets/pieces
― Simon H., Wednesday, 15 November 2017 18:56 (seven years ago)
Particularly right after he came out "bravely" against white supremacy a few weeks back
― Simon H., Wednesday, 15 November 2017 18:57 (seven years ago)
yeah Dubya's been doing PR for himself over the past year, it's nakedly transparent
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 18:57 (seven years ago)
The stupid "GWB, amateur painter" profiles were more of a rehabilitation attempt than those tweets/pieces, most of which didn't put forward "I guess GWB wasn't as bad as we thought" but rather "holy shit, I didn't actually think it could be this much worse than GWB"
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 18:59 (seven years ago)
The best ‘grift’ this morning is having a guy named Weinstein criticize young people for wanting fewer hands in their pockets. Too good.— Turning Point USA (@TPUSA) November 15, 2017
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 19:00 (seven years ago)
Uh...huh.
In re #RoyMooreChildMolester It is not #McConnell vs #Bannon It is all up to @seanhannity If he says the judge stays, he stays. If he says judge is toast then wait for the smell of burning bread. Sean's 2d most powerful person in the country right now. Ask #Keurig & Watch tonight— Geraldo Rivera (@GeraldoRivera) November 15, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 19:07 (seven years ago)
a guy named Weinstein
Uh...wut?
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 19:07 (seven years ago)
click the tweet
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 19:08 (seven years ago)
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP),
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 19:09 (seven years ago)
alas, deleted
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOsehyNWkAAbdow.jpg
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 19:10 (seven years ago)
Oh ok, i didn’t know that TP thing was referring to something Adam Weinstein posted
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 19:15 (seven years ago)
Doug Jones is now beating Roy Moore 51-39, according to a poll run Sunday-Monday by the NRSC.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/15/roy-moore-doug-jones-poll-244937
― grawlix (unperson), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:09 (seven years ago)
How long until Moore smears him as a child sex predator?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:10 (seven years ago)
And now there's this
We can't believe we're doing this, but at least for now AL-SEN--that's ALABAMA--Leans D (Doug Jones). The GOP may find a way out of this mess, but the party--thanks to Roy Moore--is on the verge of blowing what was once a sure thing. More tomorrow in the Crystal Ball.— Larry Sabato (@LarrySabato) November 15, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:16 (seven years ago)
YESSSSSS
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:18 (seven years ago)
maybe trump will delete his tweets supporting moore
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:25 (seven years ago)
easy to read that story as the NSRC selectively feeding poll numbers to Politico in order to pressure Moore to drop out, but I'll take it
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:25 (seven years ago)
"holy shit, I didn't actually think it could be this much worse than GWB"
That people feel the need to do a ranking of these shitbirds is still offensive to me, tbqh
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:26 (seven years ago)
Hellscapes, In Order
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:27 (seven years ago)
It's kind of inconceivable to me that Trump would pressure Moore to exit the race. What's Trump going to do, side with FAKE NEWS WaPo over allegations n/l identical to the ones against Trump himself? And for a guy who is essentially the personification of his base, and boosted by his buddy Bannon? Seems more likely that Trump will keep quiet, wait for him to lose, and then tweet about how he supported Luther Strange all along.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:28 (seven years ago)
one more time: GWB killed a fuckton more people (though it's early days yet)
― Simon H., Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:28 (seven years ago)
it's well established that Morbz has problems with math
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:30 (seven years ago)
Has the sand run out of Hannity's hourglass yet?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:30 (seven years ago)
My read is that the pressure would need to be pretty overwhelming for Moore to drop out. About all I can think of that might persuade him would be if McConnell told Moore flatly that he'll be expelled immediately if he wins and here's a list of the Republican Senators who'll vote to expel him (and it's more than 30).
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:31 (seven years ago)
I distinctly remember hearing in 2004 or 2005, "To think we thought his father (i.e., GHW Bush) was evil! We didn't know how good we had it!"
Trying to think of the Chthulhuian monster who will make us mildly sentimental about the Trump era.
"You know, he was brash and he was crude, but he only rarely feasted on the burnt entrails of our youngest children."
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:33 (seven years ago)
I actually was going to raise the point Simon did, but it's well known that Democrats don't think much about dead furriners, and 80% of their objections to Trump are on style/vulgarity. (more like 40% here)
also f u Shakey
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:34 (seven years ago)
Trump hasn't organized the militia movement into his personal version of Hitler's brown shirts or Mussolini's black shirts. Yet. So, there's still considerable room left for devolution.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:35 (seven years ago)
*hugs*
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:36 (seven years ago)
Trump hasn't organized the militia movement into his personal version of Hitler's brown shirts or Mussolini's black shirts
too much effort
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:37 (seven years ago)
maybe this really is hell, or at least the outer circles of a hell that's still growing new inner circles. at each stage we vaguely remember memories of better times, and then some people step back a circle and permanently stay there seeing it as an improvement, while others forge on with the new shitty mini-era to form a new circle that's a little bit worse, etc etc. i haven't seen the human centipede but kind of like that
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:37 (seven years ago)
Hmm. What happens if Moore drops out and still wins?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:39 (seven years ago)
The GOP isn't going to let this go on until Dec. 12. They're not exactly helpless down there.
― pplains, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:39 (seven years ago)
they're mostly helpless
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:41 (seven years ago)
Holy shit, just saw that Moore lawyer's interview on MSNBC. Maybe they are helpless
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:41 (seven years ago)
things like Trump and Moore are what happens when the nat'l party has lost it's centralized power
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:42 (seven years ago)
Trump hasn't organized the militia movement into his personal version of Hitler's brown shirts or Mussolini's black shirts. Yet.
What do you think ICE is?
― Moodles, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:42 (seven years ago)
not a militia
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:43 (seven years ago)
why is the president yelling at us?
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:44 (seven years ago)
ICE arrest rates are terrible and going up but bear in mind they haven't even reached the peaks of the Obama admin yet
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:44 (seven years ago)
For some reason last week I thought the Alabama election was soon. Holy shit -- the GOPs got two more weeks of this farrago.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:45 (seven years ago)
They can change the date of the election. While they kick that can, they can get Moore out of the race. And any Republican who isn't a pedophile can beat Jones.
Even Bentley could probably come back, since his affair was with a consenting adult.
― pplains, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:45 (seven years ago)
The stupid "GWB, amateur painter" profiles were more of a rehabilitation attempt than those tweets/pieces, most of which didn't put forward "I guess GWB wasn't as bad as we thought" but rather "holy shit, I didn't actually think it could be this much worse than GWB"― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP),
xp his paintings are getting better, and the subjects he paints are soldiers he sent to die, so at least he's being haunted in his dreams
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:47 (seven years ago)
They can change the date of the election.
I'm not aware of the nuances of the Governor's powers in this regard, but I have a hard time believing there would not immediately be federal lawsuits about changing the date of an election just because the party in power suspects it might lose. I mean, that's blatantly unconstitutional.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:48 (seven years ago)
No, I think she can do it, because it's a special election.
Whenever I see a picture of Mnuchin and his wife I want to punch everything, but don't, because I am struggling so hard to keep from vomiting.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:49 (seven years ago)
on top of that, there's absolutely nothing in Moore's history or character that indicates he will step aside under any circumstances. Quite the opposite, in fact.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:49 (seven years ago)
xpost The problem is that absentee ballots already went out, so I don't see how you wouldn't be messing with those votes.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:50 (seven years ago)
it seems at the very least there would be grounds to challenge any decision to change the date based on voter disenfranchisement
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:51 (seven years ago)
saw this in the hill, was wondering if it really could happen:
"However, if the Alabama Republican Party disqualifies Moore as its nominee before the election and he still wins the race, the election results would be nullified."
http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/360396-gop-hopes-trump-will-save-alabama-senate-seat
― Dan S, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:55 (seven years ago)
Disqualifies how?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:57 (seven years ago)
am i right that even if moore drops out they will still have to have a write-in candidate?
― marcos, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:58 (seven years ago)
xpostthat's my question. what would it take, and what makes it legal?
― Dan S, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 20:58 (seven years ago)
GOP's appeal to voters:
Please vote for the serial child molester we have disqualified as too disgusting to countenance. we're pretty sure we can rummage around and find someone less nauseating to put in his place after this whole sham election is nullified. Trust us on this, ok?
What voter could reject an appeal like that?
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:02 (seven years ago)
he still wins the race
a big "if" at this point, if that NRSC poll is to be believed
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:03 (seven years ago)
yes, they cannot put someone else on the ballot, write-in is their only option
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:04 (seven years ago)
lol the Dilbert guy makes this argument
― frogbs, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:09 (seven years ago)
Which means they're counting on Alabama Republican voters to be able to write. Congratulations, Senator Jones!
(Yeah, fuck it - the day I've had, I'm making an illiterate-hicks joke. FP away.)
― grawlix (unperson), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:10 (seven years ago)
ok then
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:12 (seven years ago)
i don't think my view is the same as Dilbert Guy, who i imagine thinks the vulgarity arguments are all that's there
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:12 (seven years ago)
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-roy-moore-could-lose-alabamas-senate-race/
Jones will have to do amazingly well to win. The majority of Alabama white voters haven’t voted for a Democrat since the 1970s.
― curmudgeon, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:13 (seven years ago)
yea I'm not trusting those polls just yet. as we saw with Trump a dozen times over, once this story is out of the news cycle for a full 24 hours his numbers will shoot right back up
― frogbs, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:16 (seven years ago)
Akin a better analogy than Trump imo, Moore isn't throwing out daily distractions to goose news cycles the way Trump does
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:17 (seven years ago)
wow ok so they really have no good options huh
1) moore stays in & wins - GOP has to do some kind of reckoning w/ this and chaos ensues - i dont really know how this ends, but it will be fun to watch?* 2) moore stays in & loses to jones - hello senator jones3) moore drops out and some other GOP shithead (lol sessions) has to do a write-in campaign - hello senator jones
*unless moore wins and subsequently does some kind of apology for "past events 30 years ago" and everyone forgets and moves on, equivalent to "locker room talk" and now we have another predator in DC
― marcos, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:18 (seven years ago)
Trump could easily do something to dominate the news cycle for the next two weeks while everyone forgets about this
― frogbs, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:18 (seven years ago)
I don't see how that would goose Moore's poll numbers but I guess we're going to find out, since it's almost guaranteed that Trump will do some dumb attention-getting shit between now and then
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:19 (seven years ago)
I mean sheesh it's already been a couple weeks since his last tantrum
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:20 (seven years ago)
Don't worry: should he win in December, Jones will lose in six years.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:21 (seven years ago)
I'll take it
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:21 (seven years ago)
Roy Moore atty to hold presser at 5 pm et about allegations— Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) November 15, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:22 (seven years ago)
The majority of Alabama white voters haven’t voted for a Democrat since the 1970s.
We don't need them to vote for Jones. We only need them to (a) stay home our of disgust, or (b) split their votes between Moore, Strange, Brooks, Sessions, and -heck- Col. Sanders.
― piezoelectric landlord (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:24 (seven years ago)
Ivanka has released a statement!
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:25 (seven years ago)
Gunna be fun to see what terms he uses instead of literally just complaining about haters & fake friends
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:25 (seven years ago)
Republicans have the memory of a goldfish
― frogbs, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:26 (seven years ago)
Brett Talley, the Alabama lawyer Donald Trump has nominated to be a federal district judge, seems to have written 16,381 posts—more than 3½ per day—on the University of Alabama fan message board TideFans.com. As BuzzFeed has reported, a user who is almost certainly Talley posted for years under the handle BatmanBoston.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/11/15/trump_nominee_brett_talley_appears_to_have_defended_the_first_kkk.html
― Einstein, Bazinga, Sitar (abanana), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:26 (seven years ago)
Gonna say that if Mueller decided to release news of another indictment or guilty plea right about now, things'd be...entertaining.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:27 (seven years ago)
My predix:
As a special election, this will be the only item on the ballot. It's just possible that knowing Moore is a child molester will create enough disgust or malaise among Alabama republican voters to let Jones in the side door. If they turn out in their usual numbers, Jones will lose and Moore will go to the Senate.
If more and more women keep coming forward beyond the election, it's just possible we might see Moore expelled, but the odds favor that once he's in he'd be there the full six years. Everyone will despise him, much as they despise Trump, but they'll bite their tongues and let him stay.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:28 (seven years ago)
I can't believe this is real
President Trump stops his speech to search for watercc: @marcorubio pic.twitter.com/26hR5w7ZIe— Pat Ward (@WardDPatrick) November 15, 2017
Similar,but needs work on his form.Has to be done in one single motion & eyes should never leave the camera. But not bad for his 1st time https://t.co/s49JtyRo3S— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) November 15, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:29 (seven years ago)
i had to watch rubio's again, it is amazing esp bc you see his mouth drying up well before he reaches for the water
trump doing that dumb fucking squinty eyes thing trying to look serious, fuck off
― marcos, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:31 (seven years ago)
As some Dubya flunky pointed out on MSNBC, this shows how poorly run the White House is -- you're supposed to keep uncapped water for the prez!
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:33 (seven years ago)
trump's consistent incompetence is stunning; it's so dependable
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:34 (seven years ago)
decent line from Her Self
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said on Wednesday that allegations that Roy Moore was banned from an Alabama mall are the latest indication that the GOP candidate shouldn’t serve in the Senate. “I’ve got a general rule, if you can’t be in a mall, you shouldn’t be in the Senate,” Graham told reporters.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:39 (seven years ago)
zingers are all he's good for
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:40 (seven years ago)
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), 15. november 2017 22:21 (thirteen minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Three years. It's a special election, and the seat is up in 2020.
― Frederik B, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:40 (seven years ago)
Lindsey Graham channeling the cadence of the trainer from Dodgeball there.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:41 (seven years ago)
― Frederik B, Wednesday, November 15, 2017
better!
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:45 (seven years ago)
def better
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 21:46 (seven years ago)
⚡️GOP tax debate just got more complicated with surprise opposition of Sen Ron Johnson. WI Republican says he opposes current Senate bill; its changed treatment of ``pass through'' businesses isn't satisfactory. `We're moving in the wrong direction,' he says, per @KaustuvBasu1— Laura Litvan (@LauraLitvan) November 15, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:00 (seven years ago)
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:01 (seven years ago)
didn't see that coming
I'm actually, uh....proud of my Senator? wtf
― frogbs, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:03 (seven years ago)
Meanwhile, Moore's people are holding a press conference.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:03 (seven years ago)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/democrats-furious-over-new-gop-attempt-to-gut-obamacare/2017/11/15/fdc382f8-ca23-11e7-8321-481fd63f174d_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_taxreform-445p%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
A key Senate Republican on Wednesday said he would not support the emerging GOP tax plan and another expressed major reservations about the bill, a thunderclap of trouble for party leaders as they attempt to use a slim Senate majority to pass a major overhaul of the U.S. tax code.Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said he was opposed to the new bill because it disproportionately benefits corporations at the expense of other businesses.“If they can pass it without me, let them,” Johnson said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. “I’m not going to vote for this tax package.”
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said he was opposed to the new bill because it disproportionately benefits corporations at the expense of other businesses.
“If they can pass it without me, let them,” Johnson said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. “I’m not going to vote for this tax package.”
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:04 (seven years ago)
It felt like momentum was sort of on their side until they throw in the health care stuff, which was a real clear breaking point.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:06 (seven years ago)
Like, they flew too close to the sun, if the sun were a big toilet.
NEW: @IvankaTrump with strong response to Moore allegations: “There’s a special place in hell for people who prey on children. I’ve yet to see a valid explanation and I have no reason to doubt the victims’ accounts.” Cc @AP— Tom Llamas (@TomLlamasABC) November 15, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:07 (seven years ago)
daaamn
― sleeve, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:08 (seven years ago)
Jauregui, the advisor, argues that the handwriting we've seen is different.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:08 (seven years ago)
Ivanka should run for Alabama senate.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:10 (seven years ago)
Hey Ivanka, what do you think of your dad?
moore definitely not dropping out from the sound of this press conference
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:11 (seven years ago)
just regular hell xp
― ur-oik (rip van wanko), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:12 (seven years ago)
lol @ people thinking signatures and handwriting are basically a stamp that never changes
― omar little, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:12 (seven years ago)
Why would he?
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:13 (seven years ago)
idk it looks pretty clear that he wrote on that page two separate times, the idea that someone forged this but intentionally made it look odd is so idiotic. it's the same school of thought that leads people to believe there's a gigantic government conspiracy to fake mass shootings that's somehow careless enough to cast the same crisis actors each time.
― frogbs, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:15 (seven years ago)
it's the most special, most amazing place, and it's reserved for her husband
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:16 (seven years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOtDwfvUMAAeuNO.jpg
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:17 (seven years ago)
there is probably a school of thought that suggests it's intentionally made to look sloppy because we'd imagine a conspiracy to cover their tracks, so they're playing 4-D chess with us (checkmate: we're playing 5-D chess!!!)
― omar little, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:18 (seven years ago)
when Moore plays chess, he plays All-D chess
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:19 (seven years ago)
btw i listened to maybe 10 minutes of Limbaugh today and he said his comment yesterday about Moore 'dating' teens WHEN HE WAS A DEMOCRAT was just "an observation" blown up by libruls.
He then went on a riff about how Prez Yam PLAYED "the Chi-Comms" on his Asia trip by "asking for 3 times what he wanted," like this was some tactic invented by King Dipshit. (I'm not sure what he was alleged to have "gotten" from China.)
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:23 (seven years ago)
(btw another "pearl" was that unlike us, "the Chi-Comms don't make a deal unless it's good for them")
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:24 (seven years ago)
http://images2.onionstatic.com/onion/9993/original/800.jpg
― omar little, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:25 (seven years ago)
BREAKING: Sixth woman accuses Roy Moore of groping her when he was married https://t.co/KplYjIMaa2— Justin Miller (@justinjm1) November 15, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:34 (seven years ago)
Thorp said local women have not spoken publicly against Moore before now because he had power in town and in the state, and they didn't think they would be believed."Everybody knew it wouldn't matter," she said, "that he would get elected anyway because his supporters are never going to believe anything bad about him."Johnson said the answer was even more simple."It's because somebody asked," she said. "If anybody had asked, we would have told it. No one asked."
"Everybody knew it wouldn't matter," she said, "that he would get elected anyway because his supporters are never going to believe anything bad about him."
Johnson said the answer was even more simple.
"It's because somebody asked," she said. "If anybody had asked, we would have told it. No one asked."
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:36 (seven years ago)
Democratic support, however, remains elusive. Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.), a key moderate broker, said he’s been in touch with White House aides in recent days about supporting the plan, but “I don’t see it improving.”“Between the debt and the insensitivity of this doing whatever they can to make sure that people at the top of the food chain are getting the tax breaks and the people who benefit the most are the people who need it the least — it makes no sense,” Manchin said.
“Between the debt and the insensitivity of this doing whatever they can to make sure that people at the top of the food chain are getting the tax breaks and the people who benefit the most are the people who need it the least — it makes no sense,” Manchin said.
gosh Joe, it's almost like the President lied to your face
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 15 November 2017 22:36 (seven years ago)
https://blog.humanesociety.org/wayne/2017/11/interior-department-allow-imports-elephant-lion-trophies-africa-reversing-obama-policies.html
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 23:18 (seven years ago)
every day these people find new ways to be more disgusting
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 15 November 2017 23:54 (seven years ago)
shenanigans
http://bluevirginia.us/2017/11/audio-serious-concerns-in-virginia-hd-28-including-disenfranchised-voters-split-precincts-call-election-results-into-serious-question
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 00:03 (seven years ago)
Eh?
The last time a Democrat won a U.S. Senate race in Alabama was 1992. A Democrat hasn’t won a statewide race period since 2008.
In 1998, Seiegelman won election to governor with 57% of the vote, including more than 90% of the African-American electorate.
― pplains, Thursday, 16 November 2017 01:04 (seven years ago)
what utter fuckbags
― maura, Thursday, 16 November 2017 01:14 (seven years ago)
"Alabama white voters" the key there I think
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 16 November 2017 01:20 (seven years ago)
fuckin banana republic over here
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 16 November 2017 01:23 (seven years ago)
(xpost)
WaPo just out with a new story on Moore. Today's total of new victims stories up to four.
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Thursday, 16 November 2017 01:34 (seven years ago)
One woman said that when she was a high school senior, she and Roy Moore, then 30, went on a date that ended with him giving her what she called a “forceful” kiss that left her scared. https://t.co/Z3Roxv37UU— Washington Post (@washingtonpost) November 16, 2017
― Ⓓⓡ. (Johnny Fever), Thursday, 16 November 2017 01:36 (seven years ago)
Dougie trollin
I attended the Women in Action phone bank tonight in downtown Birmingham. I joined and made some calls.Thanks for your support! pic.twitter.com/4lwGJlM2e0— Doug Jones (@GDouglasJones) November 16, 2017
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 03:24 (seven years ago)
Ah, ok.
― pplains, Thursday, 16 November 2017 03:25 (seven years ago)
Quite the thread, this.
*** THREAD ****Roy Moore must be desperate for legal counsel because he hired a racist lawyer, Trenton Garmon, who was disbarred in Alabama for an awful incident involving him impersonating a religious figure.Then-Judge Moore voted to uphold his own attorney's disbarment. pic.twitter.com/6yWo9Yqnx6— Grant Stern (@grantstern) November 15, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 16 November 2017 03:30 (seven years ago)
he is disgusting
according to this report, Steele now says that he believes most of the stuff in the dossier is not only true, but provable, and that it is likely to be proven by Mueller:
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/360508-book-steele-says-70-90-percent-of-his-trump-russia-dossier-is
not sure how much of that was generally known
― Dan S, Thursday, 16 November 2017 03:34 (seven years ago)
also here:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/nov/15/christopher-steele-trump-russia-dossier-accurate
― Dan S, Thursday, 16 November 2017 03:38 (seven years ago)
More details
https://www.nytimes.com/news/2017/nov/15/christopher-steele-trump-russia-pee-tape-extremely-real
― JoeStork, Thursday, 16 November 2017 03:49 (seven years ago)
'pee' in a NYT url
we are thru the looking glass now
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 03:57 (seven years ago)
lmao
― marcos, Thursday, 16 November 2017 04:01 (seven years ago)
Good one, Joe.
― pplains, Thursday, 16 November 2017 04:01 (seven years ago)
it's sad that trump has made so many blunders and gaffes and horrifying statements that they all just kind of sit in a giant pile of failing and shit, and humans only have enough emotional capacity and working memory to juggle a few of them in our minds at any given moment, and one of those topics in the infinite shit pile is how he sexually assaulted women.
It seems almost cruel to wish, at this point, that these women would keep speaking. They already did. They told the public that Trump grabbed them and groped them. They gave the details of where and when; they spoke about how it had affected them. A poll last October found that sixty-eight per cent of registered voters believed their stories. Only fourteen per cent believed that Trump had not made unwanted sexual advances toward women. So it’s not that we didn’t hear Trump’s accusers, or even that we didn’t believe them. We knew that they weren’t lying, and we elected him anyway. Our response when victims speak up now has to be shaped by the magnitude of that failure.
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 16 November 2017 04:21 (seven years ago)
Whenever I see a picture of Christopher Steele I think he looks like a former member of the Jam, specifically Bruce Foxton:
https://i2-prod.hinckleytimes.net/incoming/article6753186.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/WA6133462.jpg
https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/de7ee5b3d9274ed7f32bc8434093190f0f622a9f/0_233_3500_2100/master/3500.jpg?w=620&q=20&auto=format&usm=12&fit=max&dpr=2&s=ddd26932b0972970a96185fab34de306
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 16 November 2017 04:30 (seven years ago)
Oh it's getting ridiculous now.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/15/roy-moore-republicans-alabama-senate-244961
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 16 November 2017 04:33 (seven years ago)
So, this happened.
Dear Mitch McConnell,Bring. It. On.— Judge Roy Moore (@MooreSenate) November 16, 2017
Dear @MooreSenate,You’re not allowed to use the name of my cheerleader movie, you fucking pedophile. https://t.co/Hxk3J5Za15— Peyton Reed (@MrPeytonReed) November 16, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 16 November 2017 04:35 (seven years ago)
― JoeStork, Wednesday, November 15, 2017 10:49 PM (forty-one minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Was this a joke headline or does it not exist anymore?
― Evan, Thursday, 16 November 2017 04:36 (seven years ago)
In other news:
“I have new statistics,” Collins added, patting a thick black binder under her arm, “that show that for some middle-income people, it will cancel out their tax cut. The increased premium would be more than the tax reduction they would get from this bill.”
So it sounds like Collins is leaning no. Corker is maybe leaning no, because of the debt. Johnson is a no. That's three weak links at least, for now. It was hard enough for them to hammer the ACA by itself, but now it's almost impossible to avoid the appearance (for obvious reasons) that health care will be cut to fund tax cuts for the rich.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 16 November 2017 04:37 (seven years ago)
xpost Try this one: https://www.nytimes.com/news/2017/nov/15/leaked-footage-trump-peeing-in-own-mouth
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 16 November 2017 04:38 (seven years ago)
Sorry, couldn't help myself. That first one was a joke, though pee tape is always implied in everything I read about Trump.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 16 November 2017 04:39 (seven years ago)
No shock, just schadenfreude:
http://www.wnyc.org/story/incredible-shrinking-trump-organization/
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 16 November 2017 15:01 (seven years ago)
Senator Al Franken Kissed and Groped Me Without My Consent, And There’s Nothing Funny About It
http://www.kabc.com/2017/11/16/leeann-tweeden-on-senator-al-franken
― mookieproof, Thursday, 16 November 2017 15:22 (seven years ago)
baaarf
― frogbs, Thursday, 16 November 2017 15:26 (seven years ago)
Relax Al
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 16 November 2017 15:26 (seven years ago)
tbf it doesn't look like he's *actually* touching her in that photo but even still, bad Al
― frogbs, Thursday, 16 November 2017 15:30 (seven years ago)
great that Hannity already has her contact info.
― by the light of the burning Citroën, Thursday, 16 November 2017 15:32 (seven years ago)
yeah I'm guessing that pic is gonna be broadcast on FOX News nonstop for the next two weeks
― frogbs, Thursday, 16 November 2017 15:37 (seven years ago)
good
― Simon H., Thursday, 16 November 2017 15:39 (seven years ago)
well the Dems should be running a woman in 2020 anyway, and I imagine by the time we get there every potential male candidate will have been outed as a lech at the very least.
Gillenbrand/Harris '20!
― evol j, Thursday, 16 November 2017 15:40 (seven years ago)
It looks to me like he's touching her. His left hand at least.
― jmm, Thursday, 16 November 2017 15:44 (seven years ago)
Latest shenanigans!
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 15:51 (seven years ago)
ugh that Franken photo gives me Abu Ghraib vibes
― President Keyes, Thursday, 16 November 2017 15:59 (seven years ago)
Yeah.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:03 (seven years ago)
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH PEOPLE
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:06 (seven years ago)
photo, however gross, is not of what she said happened.
― by the light of the burning Citroën, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:07 (seven years ago)
uh... did you read the entire article
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:12 (seven years ago)
KABC? Yes.
― by the light of the burning Citroën, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:13 (seven years ago)
36 years since reagan promised prosperity would trickle down. 36 years of stagnant wages for 99% of americans
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:15 (seven years ago)
xpost what are you talking about dude?
― President Keyes, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:16 (seven years ago)
you did not read the entire article
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:16 (seven years ago)
you might wanna check w/ Janeane Garofalo about how Al Franken treated women (in his 40s)
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:18 (seven years ago)
The tour wrapped and on Christmas Eve we began the 36-hour trip home to L.A. After 2 weeks of grueling travel and performing I was exhausted. When our C-17 cargo plane took off from Afghanistan I immediately fell asleep, even though I was still wearing my flak vest and Kevlar helmet.It wasn’t until I was back in the US and looking through the CD of photos we were given by the photographer that I saw this one:I couldn’t believe it. He groped me, without my consent, while I was asleep.I felt violated all over again. Embarrassed. Belittled. Humiliated.How dare anyone grab my breasts like this and think it’s funny?I told my husband everything that happened and showed him the picture.
It wasn’t until I was back in the US and looking through the CD of photos we were given by the photographer that I saw this one:
I couldn’t believe it. He groped me, without my consent, while I was asleep.
I felt violated all over again. Embarrassed. Belittled. Humiliated.
How dare anyone grab my breasts like this and think it’s funny?
I told my husband everything that happened and showed him the picture.
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:18 (seven years ago)
― by the light of the burning Citroën, Thursday, November 16, 2017 11:13 AM (five minutes ago)
???
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:19 (seven years ago)
actually, Garofalo's stories aren't as damning as Tweeden's
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:21 (seven years ago)
tbf it doesn't look like he's *actually* touching her in that photo
posts you really don't need to make, jeez dude
― marcos, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:21 (seven years ago)
the fuck is wrong with you people
YOU DON'T NEED TO TRY TO MITIGATE WHAT HAPPENED OR COVER FOR THIS DUDE EVEN IF YOU LIKE HIM
― marcos, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:22 (seven years ago)
If Al is smart (and I think he is) he will just cop to it and apologize
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:23 (seven years ago)
ugh, my very bad mistake. Reading on my phone and thought it ended at the rehearsal. I apologize and I am out.
― by the light of the burning Citroën, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:23 (seven years ago)
Sen. Franken provided the following statement to Fox 9 on Thursday: "I certainly don’t remember the rehearsal for the skit in the same way, but I send my sincerest apologies to Leeann. As to the photo, it was clearly intended to be funny but wasn't. I shouldn't have done it."
― JoeStork, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:24 (seven years ago)
anyway - this idea that Strange resigns and that triggers a special election, I don't see how that gets them out of their jam cuz how will they keep Moore off the ballot? State GOP is still 100% behind him, they aren't going to block him from just running again. Seems like at best they just delay the inevitable/repeat the previous debacle. Plus with absentee ballots already sent out/being returned seems like any such decision would also trigger lawsuits.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:25 (seven years ago)
w
― by the light of the burning Citroën, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:25 (seven years ago)
the franken stuff makes me think that moore will stay in, win, and everyone will forget about it because "both sides" do it
― marcos, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:29 (seven years ago)
Al’s brother O was on that USO tour with him, so I’m awaiting what he has to say with interest.
― kim jong deal (suzy), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:32 (seven years ago)
http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/11/gov_kay_ivey_has_no_plans_to_c.html
Josh Pendergrass, communications director for Gov. Kay Ivey, said today the governor does not intend to change the date of the Dec. 12 election.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:40 (seven years ago)
Surprise!
The tax bill Senate Republicans are championing would give large tax cuts to millionaires while raising taxes on American families earning $10,000 to $75,000 over the next decade, according to an analysis released Thursday by the Joint Committee on Taxation, Congress' official nonpartisan analysts.President Trump and Republican lawmakers have been heralding their bill as a win for hard-working Americans, but the JCT report casts serious doubt on that claim. Tax hikes for households earning $10,000 to $30,000 would start in 2021 and grow sharply from there. By the year 2027, Americans earning $30,000 to $75,000 a year would also be forced to pay more in taxes even though people earning over $100,000 continue to get substantial tax cuts."What is happening now is just shameful," said Senator Ron Ryden (D-Oregon) in the Senate Finance Committee hearing shortly after the JCT tables were released. "I don’t know how anybody can go home and explain why it’s a good idea to hike taxes on parents who barely stay afloat to pay for a massive corporate handout."
President Trump and Republican lawmakers have been heralding their bill as a win for hard-working Americans, but the JCT report casts serious doubt on that claim. Tax hikes for households earning $10,000 to $30,000 would start in 2021 and grow sharply from there. By the year 2027, Americans earning $30,000 to $75,000 a year would also be forced to pay more in taxes even though people earning over $100,000 continue to get substantial tax cuts.
"What is happening now is just shameful," said Senator Ron Ryden (D-Oregon) in the Senate Finance Committee hearing shortly after the JCT tables were released. "I don’t know how anybody can go home and explain why it’s a good idea to hike taxes on parents who barely stay afloat to pay for a massive corporate handout."
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:40 (seven years ago)
the brazen inhumanity of this - the poor can just "choose" not to buy health insurance! fuck these ogres
Hatch and other Republicans say that low-income people get a choice about whether to buy health insurance or not. If they no longer wish to buy insurance, they would not get government subsidies anymore to help make their health insurance more affordable. JCT is calculating that as a tax increase, but Republicans say it is "ridiculous" to look at it that way. The subsidy was being paid to the insurance company, not to individuals."Did we take away their money? No," says Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho). "There's not one dollar taken away from them if they make that choice [not to buy insurance]."
"Did we take away their money? No," says Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho). "There's not one dollar taken away from them if they make that choice [not to buy insurance]."
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:41 (seven years ago)
that is some amazing nominative determinism
― imago, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:42 (seven years ago)
a NBC reporter said this morning that when he asked a GOP senator off the record what's the urgency the senator said, "The donors threatened never to give us another dollar if we didn't pass the tax reduction bill."
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:43 (seven years ago)
franken pic just made a times alert, this is gonna have legs
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:43 (seven years ago)
13,000,000 people will lose health care because of the republican giveaway to the top 1%
¯_(ツ)_/¯
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:43 (seven years ago)
Politico reports that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and his top advisers are privately discussing whether it would be legally feasible to get Luther Strange, the currently appointed Senator occupying Jeff Sessions’s former seat, to resign, in hopes that this would trigger a new special election.
But Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey (R), in an interview with AL.com, knocked down that idea. “The election date is set for Dec. 12,” Ivey said, adding that if Strange did resign, “I would simply appoint somebody to fill the remaining time until we have the election on Dec. 12.” Meanwhile, election law expert Rick Hasen explains why the scheme would probably violate the 17th Amendment. http://electionlawblog.org/?p=96022
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:44 (seven years ago)
yeah I know
keep in mind Franken was both a comedian and a Senator so I guess the chances of him being a predator on some sort is close to 100%
― frogbs, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:44 (seven years ago)
it's hit major outlets but I kinda doubt it tbh
(assuming there isn't more/worse shit but idk)
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:45 (seven years ago)
uh insurers would then shift those subsidy $s back into the cost of the premiums paid by policy owners. they are such half-truthing devious assholes.
xps
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:45 (seven years ago)
franken is going to end up resigning imo
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:47 (seven years ago)
yeah I think so too, as he should
god this last month has been nuts, it feels like that 3rd season of Arrested Development where they had to cram 8 episodes worth of plot into 2
― frogbs, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:48 (seven years ago)
wait waht you guys think franken should/will resign over this? that's crazy
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:50 (seven years ago)
i think you underestimate how desperately the right needs something like this to counterbalance the attention that moore is getting. that desperation, putting aside what franken actually did or didn't do, will make it huge
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:50 (seven years ago)
Reminds me of the Reason/Jacobin debate, when the Reason folks were asked about the first things they would do to improve lower-class conditions under capitalism: "we need to liberate people from public education, we need to liberate people from the high level of state influence in health care, ..."
― No purposes. Sounds. (Sund4r), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:50 (seven years ago)
xposti don't think he'll resign btw
― marcos, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:52 (seven years ago)
bingo
this is a major major gift to them and I suspect Hannity will go over the top to harass this woman
― frogbs, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:52 (seven years ago)
the right-wing media will probably go hard on this but they go hard on a lot of things and the Moore/Trump-be-Trumpin/tax bill shitshow is a bigger deal that is going to suck up more of the oxygen imo
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:53 (seven years ago)
Al Franken, of all people, is like cat nip. This may eclipse Clinton for a few weeks.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:54 (seven years ago)
I mean what are they going to do, demand his resignation because he did some bad shit while vocally supporting Trump, who has done the same shit? It doesn't make sense (not that that's ever stopped them before, but it makes it hard to write the opinion pieces...)
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:54 (seven years ago)
idk. I guess I'm kinda split as to whether or not he needs to resign. If he's got other skeletons in his closet like this then it would be pretty wise. problem is, that photo just looks really really bad and that's the stuff that people respond to. hence why the Access Hollywood tape got so much traction but the dozens of woman who claimed Trump assaulted them didn't.
― frogbs, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:55 (seven years ago)
no one reads opinion pieces man, what's going to happen is it will be all over the news
― k3vin k., Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:55 (seven years ago)
but yes of course Foxnews.com is all "sexual misdeeds of Franken, Clinton, Biden" headliners right now, not surprising
but it having any meaningful impact (ie, pushes him out of office, saves Moore's seat, passes the tax bill) seems highly unlikely to me
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:56 (seven years ago)
You're right, he'll be elected president for sure
― Evan, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:56 (seven years ago)
My mom hasn’t phoned me to gloat yet; that’s my barometer.
― kim jong deal (suzy), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:56 (seven years ago)
if Franken was running for re-election at the moment I'd be worried, but he isn't
goddammit, to this whole thing. i always liked franken.
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:56 (seven years ago)
regardless of what he ought or ought'n't do I fear that this is going to knock the horrible tax plan out of the headlines which is going to harm far far more people than the actions of a pervy Senator
― frogbs, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:57 (seven years ago)
Poor people would be less poor if they just stopped throwing their money away on food and shelter. What a bunch of dumb SOBs.
Like, I write that as a pitch-black joke but at the rate we're going, I would bet good money that some GOP human skidmark will make that exact argument within the next 6-12 months.
― Home of the Ill-Considered Gravy Spigot (Old Lunch), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:57 (seven years ago)
David Brooks is already writing a piece about the Culture of Degradation. It'll get published a day before allegations of sexual misconduct hit him.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:57 (seven years ago)
can't wait
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 16:58 (seven years ago)
"President Trump and Republican lawmakers have been heralding their bill as a win for hard-working Americans"
Poor people just need to work harder, duh.
― Evan, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:04 (seven years ago)
I could see dem leadership pushing him to resign to claim moral high ground re:Moore, but that wouldn't actually work bc Fox would just switch back to Clinton.
― JoeStork, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:05 (seven years ago)
McConnell's called for an Ethics Committee investigation of Franken
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:05 (seven years ago)
I think at worst he's gonna get censured but even that may be a stretch for the Senate.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:06 (seven years ago)
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/al-franken-sexual-assault-mcconnell-congress-investigation
Less than an hour after news broke that a woman had accused Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) of sexual misconduct toward her in 2006, before he ran for federal office, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) called for an official investigation into the allegations.“As with all credible allegations of sexual harassment or assault, I believe the Ethics Committee should review the matter,” McConnell said. “I hope the Democratic Leader will join me on this. Regardless of party, harassment and assault are completely unacceptable—in the workplace or anywhere else.”
“As with all credible allegations of sexual harassment or assault, I believe the Ethics Committee should review the matter,” McConnell said. “I hope the Democratic Leader will join me on this. Regardless of party, harassment and assault are completely unacceptable—in the workplace or anywhere else.”
that was fast.
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:06 (seven years ago)
As the raised-on-the-web generation matures, how many men will meet the Good Behavior bar currently being set? Not many. Those who identify as asexual may benefit disproportionately.
(I'm not trying to "normalize" any of this shit btw. I'm pretty sure I haven't assaulted anyone, but trust me, I couldn't run for office.)
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:06 (seven years ago)
Minnesota Dems have no choice, strategic or otherwise, but to pressure Franken to resign.
― Anne of the Thousand Gays (Eric H.), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:06 (seven years ago)
Wouldn't be surprised if this leads to people naming names of other congressional harassers
― JoeStork, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:07 (seven years ago)
Those who identify as asexual may benefit disproportionately.
They wish. (As recently as two years ago, I would've written "we wish." So there's my inevitable slide into cretinism with age.)
― Anne of the Thousand Gays (Eric H.), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:08 (seven years ago)
at last we'll get citizen legislators, about a third of them virgins.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:08 (seven years ago)
Now would be a good time to out McConnell and his sham marriage, surely?
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:09 (seven years ago)
why do they have no choice?
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:12 (seven years ago)
Because Minnesota.
― Anne of the Thousand Gays (Eric H.), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:13 (seven years ago)
I genuinely doubt Al Franken is going anywhere. Why? The magic word "comity." Senators go out of their way to protect each other, and protect the institution of the Senate. This crosses party lines.
― grawlix (unperson), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:18 (seven years ago)
^^^
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:20 (seven years ago)
isn't that out the window, along with the fabled "bipartisanship"?
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:21 (seven years ago)
This crosses party lines.
More so than gender lines, maybe?
― Anne of the Thousand Gays (Eric H.), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:22 (seven years ago)
Anyway, Democratic Gov. can appoint replacement prior to special election next year, which is almost certainly in the bag for dems (from this vantage point).
― Anne of the Thousand Gays (Eric H.), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:23 (seven years ago)
Personally I'm okay with throwing Franken into the fire, if that's the price of taking Moore et al. seriously.
It could potentially wrong-foot and disorient the right if the (cultural left) refused to hand them ammunition and just said, collectively: "Yeah. That was wrong too. Your point?"
The expectation on the right is that they will catch us all in a collective act of hypocrisy, and defend "ours" while pillorying "theirs." What if we just didn't walk straight into that trap?
― loretta swit happens (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:23 (seven years ago)
or franken should be called on to resign because it's the right thing to do?
― -_- (jim in vancouver), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:25 (seven years ago)
I don't think any decisions should be made in terms of their tactical impact on RW media, with which there is no "winning"
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:25 (seven years ago)
Franken is done. He is going to be called on to resign. None of this will bring Trump or any republicans closer to a reckoning on similar claims.
― Moodles, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:27 (seven years ago)
maybe I'm underestimating the seriousness of this incident but it doesn't seem to warrant his resignation imo. People guilty of way shittier stuff have stayed in the Senate and been good Senators.
idk
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:27 (seven years ago)
Mitigating factor: Franken's "jokes" about women have been in question since the start of his political career.
― Anne of the Thousand Gays (Eric H.), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:28 (seven years ago)
He is going to be called on to resign
by who - McConnell? Klobuchar? Schumer? It depends on who demands it.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:28 (seven years ago)
by me, then
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:30 (seven years ago)
The fact that many people on the left are already calling for his resignation means he's cooked. In the current environment, with new abuse scandals dropping every day, no one is going to stomach rushing to his defense.
― Moodles, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:30 (seven years ago)
Story is revolting
The disrespect in the pic is beyond idiotic, I doubt I would have done anything that stupid even as a teenager
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:32 (seven years ago)
his home state is currently undergoing one of those statehouse-harassment things, touching both D(FL)s and Rs, so the rhetorical field is not favorable to a no-consequence response by local or national Ds to his groping story
he won election on a contentious recount and the Rs have had a majority in the statehouse and trump did embarrassingly ok here so it's not really an awesome time to be losing a solid D senator. : /
― j., Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:32 (seven years ago)
I just don't see it, it kinda doesn't matter how many people tweet about it - if he maintains the support of Klobuchar and the Dem nat'l party apparatus he could weather it. if he was up for re-election it would be a different story.
when was the last time a sitting Senator voluntarily resigned? I can't remember.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:33 (seven years ago)
as j. points out - the larger party is going to look at this as losing a Senate seat in a non-election year, they aren't going to swallow that easily
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:34 (seven years ago)
He should resign by the end of the day. Fuck the party.
― .oO (silby), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:34 (seven years ago)
Not the greatest choice of words Shakey
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:34 (seven years ago)
Hey Al, what's your memory of that rehearsal? Curious to know
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:35 (seven years ago)
hey it's not my fault yr mind's in the gutter!
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:35 (seven years ago)
it is pretty gross and if a woman comes forward about feeling violated by a man we should believe her, full stop, none of that "well you see it doesn't seem to be that bad etc" and the man should have to deal with the consequences appropriate to what he did.
this is a good test! no one liked Harvey Weinstein, no one cared about Kevin Spacey, here's a guy who many were saying should run in 2020 and he's politically sharp and seems decent in his policies, but the people we already hate can't be the only ones who pay in this circumstance.
― omar little, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:35 (seven years ago)
i don’t think he needs to resign either, but tbh i’ve never been on board with the social media “this person did a bad thing so let’s get them to lose their job” thing.
what is clear is that that photo is grotesque, he should be ashamed of himself, and he owes her a better apology than the one he’s released to the public
― k3vin k., Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:36 (seven years ago)
stupid morality and its stupid tests
― j., Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:36 (seven years ago)
the larger party is going to look at this as losing a Senate seat in a non-election year, they aren't going to swallow that easily
By Minnesota law, Democratic governor would appoint replacement if Franken quits, w/ special election next year. So Dems have no political reason not to ask him to resign. pic.twitter.com/juq59umPXI— Aaron Wiener (@aaronwiener) November 16, 2017
― Anne of the Thousand Gays (Eric H.), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:37 (seven years ago)
i think it makes sense (politically, machiavellianly) for republicans to try bring the hammer down on franken. sexual assault is a bipartisan problem. if franken goes down in this way, that could open the floodgates to accusations of both republicans and democrats. the difference is that democrats are much more willing to voluntarily police behavior from their ingroup. republicans are not like that. these are the senate republicans who stole the supreme court seat, plainly, and just grimaced like a turtle at anyone who called them out on it. so i can imagine them being willing to open up pandora's box of accusations, knowing that their lack of shame gives them an advantage
fuck this year and this life btw
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:38 (seven years ago)
well that doesn't sound so bad, although I dunno who the decent candidates are that would replace him
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:38 (seven years ago)
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:39 (seven years ago)
Karl's analysis is probably otm
YMP - the Moore-supporting right has already decided Franken is guilty, and the multiple accusers of Moore are politically motivated liars. Franken stepping down amid left-wing condemnation won't change their views an iota. They'll return to Clinton as soon as Franken isn't handy. This isn't to say he shouldn't resign anyway, it's just that scoring points on right wing shitheads is not the reason.
― JoeStork, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:40 (seven years ago)
Just yesterday I thought, "This week a woman will accuse a Dem legislator of assault or harassment." It's inevitable. Burn the fucking thing down.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:41 (seven years ago)
yes otm. I assume any Dems clamoring for his resignation are doing so because they think a no-tolerance policy for elected officials in this respect is the right thing to do.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:41 (seven years ago)
the advantage for the right here is the photo. though if this was a Roy Moore photo the right wing twittersphere would already be analyzing the shadows, checking for photoshops, identifying the woman as having been one of Trump's accusers.
― omar little, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:42 (seven years ago)
the governor is on his way out, he's not running for re-election, my guess is that a special election for the senate seat would be considered a potential pickup for Rs, though it would be expected to go D. but it would depend on the candidates.
― j., Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:42 (seven years ago)
i know an old staffer of franken's who has been following all the harassment stories closely, i will be watching to see what she says
― j., Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:44 (seven years ago)
the always moral United States of America superpower, drenched in blood every day of its existence.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:45 (seven years ago)
"As to the photo,"
good apologizing
― jmm, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:46 (seven years ago)
hough if this was a Roy Moore photo the right wing twittersphere would already be analyzing the shadows, checking for photoshops, identifying the woman as having been one of Trump's accusers.
― omar little, Thursday, November 16, 2017 5:42 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
left-liberal photoshop truthers are already on the case tbf
Per the picture data Original Date/Time {0x9003} = 2006:12:21 17:19:30Digitization Date/Time {0x9004} = 2006:12:21 17:19:30 Software / Firmware Version {0x0131} = Adobe Photoshop 7.0Last Modified Date/Time {0x0132} = 2009:07:01 22:30:56— zedster (@z3dster) November 16, 2017
― soref, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:47 (seven years ago)
i didn't say he should resign (although i do).
i'm saying he will. he's a 90s comedian, so there's no way this is the last of it. and he's in MN, so it's not like he's irreplaceable or the seat is vulnerable. there's not much incentive for the state or national party to protect him because of that.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:47 (seven years ago)
Franken did a little better on his second try
NEW FRANKEN STATEMENT pic.twitter.com/c3puSkK9Ts— Sam Stein (@samstein) November 16, 2017
― Moodles, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:48 (seven years ago)
He degraded and violated a woman. Of course he should go. His "not how I remember it but apols anyway" is some stupid shit.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:49 (seven years ago)
xp ah, statement two
and he's in MN, so it's not like he's irreplaceable or the seat is vulnerable.
the seat is vulnerable
I'm not saying political calculations outweigh moral ones here, but in terms of what's going to happen significant actors *will* be making political calculations about this.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:49 (seven years ago)
to those upthread - yeah, okay. Agreed that we shouldn't do stuff just to placate Breitbart, which will never ever happen. (Aside: try to say "placate Breitbart" five times fast).
But OTOH I'm not going to expend a lot of sweat defending Franken (or Weiner, or B. Clinton, or whoev).
― loretta swit happens (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:50 (seven years ago)
second statement doesn't change a thing imo.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:51 (seven years ago)
I think he improved the way he addressed it, doesn't let him off the hook though
― Moodles, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:52 (seven years ago)
― j., Thursday, November 16, 2017 5:36 PM (ten minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I have no opinion on the calculus of whether or not Franken should resign. But I think asking our elected representatives to be accountable for offenses against others is, I hope, neither a stupid morality test nor too high a bar? Or not to have acts of sexual assault in their pasts at all--I don't think that's too much to ask.
― Conic section rebellion 44 (in orbit), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:52 (seven years ago)
caek, he's a '70s comedian, so double the potential offenses
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:54 (seven years ago)
xp you misread me
― j., Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:55 (seven years ago)
Okay sorry, maybe I wasn't following.
― Conic section rebellion 44 (in orbit), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:56 (seven years ago)
WaPo: Update: Three of Franken’s colleagues, Sens. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Tim Kaine (D-Va.) have expressed initial support for a Senate investigation.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:56 (seven years ago)
no i mean yes of course we should be moral but rrrrrrrrrrrr
― j., Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:56 (seven years ago)
it would be so cool to be a nihilist republican
― j., Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:57 (seven years ago)
he called for an ethics investigation in his own (second) statement, so i assume everyone will be onboard
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 16 November 2017 17:58 (seven years ago)
from same WaPo story:
The outcome of a 2018 special election isn’t entirely certain, but, unlike neighboring states, Democrats in Minnesota weathered the Trump surge last year to hand its electoral votes to Hillary Clinton by a narrow margin. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, Franken’s peer, is also on the ballot; her seat is rated by the Cook Political Report as “solid Democratic.” An off-year election might normally be disadvantageous to the Democrats, but 2018 is shaping up to be a strong year for the party nationally because of the deep unpopularity of the president.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:04 (seven years ago)
seems to me that the main issue is what the social standard for handling these kinds of accusations is, because it's clearly shifting (which is good!) but to what exactly isn't clear. Is anyone who is accused of anything automatically disqualified from serving in public office, or being employed? Is there no punishment/rehabilitation/other course of action short of being banned from public life as a pariah that is acceptable? I'm not trying to be facetious or combative here, I expect there's a range of opinions about this.
I do think this larger question has some political implications because as noted upthread one side is going to be more inclined to weaponize this in unsavory ways than the other - the GOP realizing they can destroy opponents simply by making accusations (absent any legal proceeding/burden of proof beyond "always believe the victim"), it is going to get real ugly real quick. Uglier than things are now, even. They will see this as a weakness on the left that they can exploit for gain. To be clear, I am not saying that is what's going on in this particular case with Franken, I have no reason to doubt Leeann's statement and the photo is incontrovertible evidence, but you have to imagine the wheels turning in McConnell et al's heads.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:05 (seven years ago)
yes. duh.
He's calling Leeann Tweeden a liar
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:06 (seven years ago)
Not sure how an "investigation" will address that
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:07 (seven years ago)
the "i don't remember it the same way" bit comes from the usual playbook despite the apologetic tone.
― omar little, Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:07 (seven years ago)
the right-wing already has absorbed the logic that accusers are all liars doing it for attention/political gain - it's not a far jump from there to doing it themselves. and certainly the alt-right has gone full-bore in turning the left's ideals/precepts about things like free speech against the left. Not to mention the right-wing echo chamber's pension for totally fake conspiracy theories like pizzagate. It seems kind of inevitable.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:08 (seven years ago)
acknowledging differences in memory /= "liar" accusations. People's memories diverge all the time, about everything...? how is that even debatable.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:09 (seven years ago)
just bcz the tactic is used by liars doesn't always mean those words are a lie.
However, I am predisposed to think ill of Franken. (He's a Clintonite, after all.)
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:12 (seven years ago)
read the room shakey
― k3vin k., Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:13 (seven years ago)
(not saying i agree or disagree — just don’t think this is a discussion people want to have right now)
― k3vin k., Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:15 (seven years ago)
in other news, Menendez officially gets a mistrial verdict
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:17 (seven years ago)
― j., Thursday, November 16, 2017 12:57 PM (twenty-three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
You would be nihilistic about stuff about sexual harassment, but you would care an inordinate amount about people saying "Happy Holidays," instead of "Merry Christmas."
So there trade-offs.
― voodoo chili, Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:22 (seven years ago)
N. Carolina Trump voters have buyer's remorse: http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/The-Daily-202-Trump-voters-have-buyer-s-remorse-12362051.php
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:24 (seven years ago)
Reading the article I wonder, not for the first time, why Americans haven't erected a guillotine in 250 years.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:38 (seven years ago)
there was a diy scaled-down trebuchet trend a few years ago, bet we could exploit that impulse
― .oO (silby), Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:39 (seven years ago)
Pierce:
Way back when Barney Frank was in Congress, and he got involved with a male prostitute named Steve Gobie, The Boston Globe went into full Hibernian Sex Panic, demanding that Frank resign of the grounds of "Oooh, Icky!" Appearing on Nightline, George Will, of all people, took the Let The People Decide position.
If the voters of Alabama want to be represented by the Don Juan of Cinnabon, that’s their choice and nobody else’s. When Al Franken stands for re-election, the voters of Minnesota deserve the chance to weigh his qualifications in the light of this episode. Anything else is substituting moral theater for political reality.
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a13787318/al-franken-groping/
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:40 (seven years ago)
Hibernian Sex Panic is a good band name
― .oO (silby), Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:41 (seven years ago)
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, November 16, 2017 1:38 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
we'll see what happens if the GOP manages to pass these tax cuts...
― voodoo chili, Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:42 (seven years ago)
For a second I thought this said "ELECTED a guillotine" and was like
https://community.gophersvids.com/uploads/monthly_2016_10/58126c58f2bc5_InRodWeTrust.jpg.25963e19f97f897188d5ca648ae9897a.jpg
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:43 (seven years ago)
What do you think his "differing" memory of that could possibly be Shakey? That she was into it? That he didn't have to beg? That it was a kiss on the cheek? He didn't apologise AT ALL for it, so he's implicitly contending that Tweeden is way off - off enough that it's more than a just slight difference of interpretation, i.e. she's lying. It's completely disgusting
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 16 November 2017 18:45 (seven years ago)
"Hey ex-Playmate, I wrote a scene for you!! Well, for us. Your 'character' kisses my 'character'"fuck outta here
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 16 November 2017 19:15 (seven years ago)
guillotine/guillotine 2018guillotine/guillotine 2020
― Simon H., Thursday, 16 November 2017 19:19 (seven years ago)
He didn't apologise AT ALL for it
huh
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DOxXwUJW0AAhcD6.jpg:large
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 19:20 (seven years ago)
Charles Pierce piece is p otm, I think
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 19:21 (seven years ago)
So ... she's a conservative commentator and personal friend of Hannity who apparently ran the story by Roger Stone before going forward? Anyway, Franken apologized (right?), she accepted his apology (right?), and she hasn't asked for an investigation (right?) but Franken has. Is that where it's at?
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 16 November 2017 19:24 (seven years ago)
I think so, yes
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 19:27 (seven years ago)
In other news--
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/16/trump-rally-house-republicans-tax-vote-244965
House Republicans passed a $5.5 trillion tax bill
The bill passed 227-205, with 13 Republicans breaking with leadership to vote against the legislation. Not a single Democrat backed the bill
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 16 November 2017 19:27 (seven years ago)
well idk if she "accepted" his apology, I kinda doubt it
I literally heard her say she accepted it during a press conference an hour ago.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 16 November 2017 19:29 (seven years ago)
She was still irked that he hadn't apologized years ago, but she accepted it.
I bet a lot of people who aren't old enough don't know that Barney Frank was uncloseted by a prostitute. Seems nearly innocent in today's environment.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 19:33 (seven years ago)
What do you think his "differing" memory of that could possibly be Shakey?
Probably that the kiss meant anything other than an overdone physical bit, if I were to guess.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Thursday, 16 November 2017 19:34 (seven years ago)
pierce somewhat otm. i do think there are certain ethical standards for public servants that should be upheld, and that is what the ethics committee will investigate. this incident occurred when franken was not a senator, which will probably matter (whether it should is a fair point for debate)
― k3vin k., Thursday, 16 November 2017 19:35 (seven years ago)
Presumably he was already mulling running for office? Think ahead a little before you recreate your Lampoon hijinks?
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 19:38 (seven years ago)
xpost I misread that as Frank uncloseted *as* a prostitute, and I thought, huh, I did not know that.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 16 November 2017 19:38 (seven years ago)
so wait is there any reason beyond party affiliation of the governor (an admittedly consequential reason) that we're not calling on Menedez to resign— slackbot (@pareene) November 16, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:10 (seven years ago)
I'm sure Gov. Christie would appoint a non-corrupt Republican
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:13 (seven years ago)
so he can resign in January
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:21 (seven years ago)
at which point some other corrupt Democrat can be appointed
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:21 (seven years ago)
oh hey look
Al Franken admits guilt after photographic evidence of his abuse surfaces.Mitch: "Let's investigate."In Alabama, ZERO evidence, allegations 100% rejected.Mitch: "Moore must quit immediately or be expelled."— Judge Roy Moore (@MooreSenate) November 16, 2017
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:22 (seven years ago)
yeah well with franken it was one adult woman and you have been creeping on dozens of children for years, roy
― akm, Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:26 (seven years ago)
'Don Juan of the Cinnabon' got me
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:27 (seven years ago)
more Poppy
First on CNN: New George H.W. Bush accuser says he groped her during 1992 re-election campaignhttps://t.co/HL2M9wgwYQ— Ram Ramgopal (@RamCNN) November 16, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:28 (seven years ago)
Shakey he apologised for the photo, which was juvenile and disrespectful. But not the unwanted tongue kiss, which is borderline assault, and about which he is calling her a liar. Unless there's something I'm missing in that screenshot you posted?
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:29 (seven years ago)
where's his left hand
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:29 (seven years ago)
btw
BREAKING: FCC votes to eliminate media ownership rules, paving way for one company to own multiple TV stations or both TV station/newspaper in one market— Jeremy B. White (@JeremyBWhite) November 16, 2017
― mookieproof, Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:29 (seven years ago)
truly a champion of the common man
― frogbs, Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:31 (seven years ago)
Shakey he apologised for the photo,
the opening paragraph of that 2nd statement reads like a blanket apology for the entire thing to me, idk how you could read it any other way.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:32 (seven years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWwGM9x2Gxs&feature=
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:32 (seven years ago)
That FCC news is not fake news.
― A is for (Aimless), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:33 (seven years ago)
I look fwd to there being only 2 media companies inside five years.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:34 (seven years ago)
here's what Tweeden had to say re: his apology
Tweeden said she accepted Franken’s apology.
“Yes, people make mistakes and, of course, he knew he made a mistake,” she said at a news conference in Los Angeles, where she works as a radio news anchor for KABC. She said she would leave any disciplinary action up to Senate leaders and was not calling for Franken to step down. “That’s up to them. I’m not demanding that.”
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:34 (seven years ago)
Shakes man he specifically denies her account!
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:35 (seven years ago)
xp I look fwd to there being five years.
― Anne of the Thousand Gays (Eric H.), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:35 (seven years ago)
FCC votes to eliminate media ownership rules, paving way for one company to own multiple TV stations or both TV station/newspaper in one market
Egad! Does that mean that large media conglomerates might soon disproportionately control local media market shares?
Hmmm. Does this mean that our current local TV news coverage - especially the hard-hitting investigative stuff - might become bland and inane and biased? What a calamity that would be.
― loretta swit happens (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:36 (seven years ago)
if u wanna read it differently and be more outraged than Tweeden I guess that's up to you
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:37 (seven years ago)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWwGM9x2Gxs&feature=
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:38 (seven years ago)
idk why i cant ever do this right lol
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:39 (seven years ago)
5th time's the charm!
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:44 (seven years ago)
STFU
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:46 (seven years ago)
to embed a youtube video you just need to paste the url, no formatting is needed.
― new noise, Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:49 (seven years ago)
so the tax plan passed in the House, do we think the Senate's gonna go for it er nah?
― frogbs, Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:51 (seven years ago)
Senate's down 2 votes at the moment (Johnson and probably Collins), one more (Flake, Corker, McCain, Murkowski?) and it's over
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:52 (seven years ago)
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:54 (seven years ago)
i copied the url and just pasted it here and it doesn't work. fuck i done screwing up this thread for today xxp
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:55 (seven years ago)
You need to paste the url but change it from https:// to http://
― grawlix (unperson), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:56 (seven years ago)
ugh
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:57 (seven years ago)
Also, take out the “&feature=“ just to be safe
“/watch?v=“ then the 10-12 characters for the video title
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Thursday, 16 November 2017 20:58 (seven years ago)
Does this mean that our current local TV news coverage - especially the hard-hitting investigative stuff - might become bland and inane and biased? What a calamity that would be.
I think it's more like, imagine if this group owned the largest station AND the only newspaper in your city.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair_Broadcast_Group#Political_views
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:00 (seven years ago)
Who needs papers and TV? What is this, the 20th century? I get my fake news from the internet.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:02 (seven years ago)
I get my fake news from a guy on canal st
― Evan, Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:04 (seven years ago)
I just sit at home and imagine scenarios, figuring a few of them must be happening, somewhere.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:05 (seven years ago)
https://www.minnpost.com/politics-policy/2017/11/sen-al-franken-accused-sexual-assault-harassment-radio-host
huh even jason lewis is slow-walking
― j., Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:17 (seven years ago)
if i had a dollar for every time i find myself thinking: hypocrisy knows no bounds.— Monica Lewinsky (@MonicaLewinsky) October 19, 2017
― j., Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:22 (seven years ago)
why hasn't monica gone full right wing talk show host yet? that would be amusing (and then I would kill myself)
― akm, Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:38 (seven years ago)
yes bcz why wdn't she
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:39 (seven years ago)
why would she want to join up with the people that used her as a political football
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:40 (seven years ago)
why not, it is the 21st century and nothing makes sense anymore
― akm, Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:40 (seven years ago)
all of this makes perfect sense, it's just horrifying
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:41 (seven years ago)
also I'm not entirely sure what her twitter statement means
― akm, Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:41 (seven years ago)
Perpetual War politics: as with the Cong in Vietnam, if the US kills you, you're obviously ISIS:
"Between April 2016 and June 2017, we visited the sites of nearly 150 airstrikes across northern Iraq, not long after ISIS was evicted from them. We toured the wreckage; we interviewed hundreds of witnesses, survivors, family members, intelligence informants and local officials; we photographed bomb fragments, scoured local news sources, identified ISIS targets in the vicinity and mapped the destruction through satellite imagery. We also visited the American air base in Qatar where the coalition directs the air campaign. There, we were given access to the main operations floor and interviewed senior commanders, intelligence officials, legal advisers and civilian-casualty assessment experts. We provided their analysts with the coordinates and date ranges of every airstrike — 103 in all — in three ISIS-controlled areas and examined their responses. The result is the first systematic, ground-based sample of airstrikes in Iraq since this latest military action began in 2014.
"We found that one in five of the coalition strikes we identified resulted in civilian death, a rate more than 31 times that acknowledged by the coalition. It is at such a distance from official claims that, in terms of civilian deaths, this may be the least transparent war in recent American history. Our reporting, moreover, revealed a consistent failure by the coalition to investigate claims properly or to keep records that make it possible to investigate the claims at all. While some of the civilian deaths we documented were a result of proximity to a legitimate ISIS target, many others appear to be the result simply of flawed or outdated intelligence that conflated civilians with combatants. In this system, Iraqis are considered guilty until proved innocent. Those who survive the strikes, people like Basim Razzo, remain marked as possible ISIS sympathizers, with no discernible path to clear their names."
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/11/16/magazine/uncounted-civilian-casualties-iraq-airstrikes.html
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:43 (seven years ago)
"if i had a dollar for ever time i find myself thinking"
^ too easy, we can't think ourselves rich, lady.
Otoh: what a terrible shitshow to see her twitter mentions. What she became "famous" for was 20 (TWENTY) years ago. And there wasn't the amplification of social media back then. Boy is there right now. She's experiencing dozens of ppl shouting at her every single day because of something twenty years ago. I applaud her for staying so cool and level headed. I wouldn't be able to cope.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:46 (seven years ago)
― akm, Thursday, November 16, 2017 4:41 PM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
she’s saying bill and hillary have gotten off easy, and she’s right
― k3vin k., Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:47 (seven years ago)
Hillary got off easy
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:49 (seven years ago)
?
Why senators shouldn't be so quick to expel Roy Moore should he win.,
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:50 (seven years ago)
that just seems like a weird thing to say re: Lewinsky
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:50 (seven years ago)
http://cookpolitical.com/analysis/house/house-overview/wave-comin
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:56 (seven years ago)
her role in the gennifer flowers case was pretty fucked up, and probably would have been received a lot differently today
― k3vin k., Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:57 (seven years ago)
yeah that's true
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:58 (seven years ago)
Congressional Office of Compliance releases year-by-year breakdown of harassment settlements and awards: pic.twitter.com/vxbezi22wb— Reid Wilson (@PoliticsReid) November 16, 2017
― mookieproof, Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:58 (seven years ago)
at the same time I do feel like she suffered plenty from that whole debacle (Bill, not so much)
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 21:59 (seven years ago)
DJP otm
― loretta swit happens (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 16 November 2017 22:01 (seven years ago)
not a patch on fox news' payouts in total money involved, but that seems like a lot of separate incidents.
also considering that's taxpayer money, it seems like more details might be in order
― mookieproof, Thursday, 16 November 2017 22:01 (seven years ago)
man what happened in 2002 and 2007 lol
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 22:02 (seven years ago)
It's taxpayer money but it goes back into the economy. Plaintiffs and their attorneys buy goods and services with it, so it's all good, right? It trickles back up.
― loretta swit happens (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 16 November 2017 22:03 (seven years ago)
Alabama Senate poll (Fox News)Jones (D) 50%Moore (R) 42% https://t.co/mN9Lvg8tK4— Steve Kornacki (@SteveKornacki) November 16, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 16 November 2017 22:16 (seven years ago)
I'm not sure but that's a really tight window
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 22:18 (seven years ago)
haha
pic.twitter.com/xb6Fo8oPNS— warrior cop (@wyatt_privilege) November 15, 2017
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 22:20 (seven years ago)
Senate continues to devolvehttps://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/16/chuck-grassley-trump-court-picks-245367?lo=ap_a1
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 22:26 (seven years ago)
ha, someone uncovered a tax break for owners of private plans. That's the middle class for you.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 16 November 2017 23:07 (seven years ago)
maybe I just totally misread Monica's twitter but I thought she was referencing the hypocrisy of those defending Moore while others call for Franken to resign. but maybe I am overthinking it.
― akm, Thursday, 16 November 2017 23:50 (seven years ago)
i'm almost impressed by how brazenly evil this tax plan is. they really have no respect for their voters at all.
― treeship 2, Thursday, 16 November 2017 23:53 (seven years ago)
well their voters are letting them get away with it
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 16 November 2017 23:57 (seven years ago)
there's nothing to say except it represents a severely malfunctioning democratic system
― treeship 2, Friday, 17 November 2017 00:08 (seven years ago)
Lewinsky's twitter post was from October 19th. Who knows what it was about? So much shit has gone down that I can't even remember what was happening that far back
― Dan S, Friday, 17 November 2017 00:34 (seven years ago)
After Al Franken and Roy Moore, We Are Dangerously Close To Botching The #MeToo Moment
Today, two women accused Senator Al Franken (D-MN) of harassment. Radio host and model Leeann Tweeden wrote that back when she and then-prominent comedian Franken were on a USO tour together in 2006, he forcibly kissed her during rehearsals for the show. Accompanying the story was a photo of Franken reaching for Tweeden’s breasts while Tweeden appeared to be asleep. Franken has apologized and called for a formal ethics investigation into his conduct. Reaction from the left was swift and mostly damning. Democrats have no moral authority on the issue of sexual assault and harassment unless they condemn it from everybody, even their caucus’s class clown. On the heels of Tweeden’s disturbing allegations, however, another woman came forward claiming that she too had been “stalked and harassed” by Franken. Melanie Morgan teased her accusation with a Tweet, and then directed curious readers to her website. On her website, she described how Franken called her more than once because he disagreed with how she was discussing a policy issue on the radio.Even giving Morgan the extremely generous benefit of the doubt, it’s hard to pretend what she alleges Franken did is the same thing as what Tweeden’s picture shows Franken actually doing. Nor is what Tweeden’s picture shows, horrible as it is, the same as what somebody like Roger Ailes or Bill Clinton did.Which gets to a problem. Right now, the court of public opinion is faced with the awkward task of assigning degrees of severity to sexual misconduct, because, while they all cause harm, they don’t all cause the same amount of harm and thus don’t merit the same punishment. Furthermore, punishment varies by the power the offender wields. A senator, for example, should have a much higher moral threshold than, say, a comedian. Writing in The New Yorker this week, Masha Gessen treads lightly in making this point, warning that the #MeToo moment could devolve into “sex panic” if we’re not careful. “The distinctions between rape and coercion are meaningful, in the way it is meaningful to distinguish between, say, murder and battery,” Gessen writes.One’s political ideology or past advocacy doesn’t mean it’s impossible for a person to be victimized by somebody with opposing ideology. But if what she’s written is all she’s got, Morgan’s account reeks of naked political opportunism, of weaponizing victimhood in a way that is so morally bankrupt that it threatens to derail the entire #MeToo conversation for selfish political ends.(I suppose it also bears mentioning here that while Fox News’ primetime lineup was going up in flames thanks to decades of sexual misconduct coming to light, Morgan was leading the charge to protect men like Bill O’Reilly—who has settled tens of millions of dollars worth of sexual harassment lawsuits during his career—from being fired for what Morgan called “dubious” reasons.)
On the heels of Tweeden’s disturbing allegations, however, another woman came forward claiming that she too had been “stalked and harassed” by Franken. Melanie Morgan teased her accusation with a Tweet, and then directed curious readers to her website. On her website, she described how Franken called her more than once because he disagreed with how she was discussing a policy issue on the radio.
Even giving Morgan the extremely generous benefit of the doubt, it’s hard to pretend what she alleges Franken did is the same thing as what Tweeden’s picture shows Franken actually doing. Nor is what Tweeden’s picture shows, horrible as it is, the same as what somebody like Roger Ailes or Bill Clinton did.
Which gets to a problem. Right now, the court of public opinion is faced with the awkward task of assigning degrees of severity to sexual misconduct, because, while they all cause harm, they don’t all cause the same amount of harm and thus don’t merit the same punishment. Furthermore, punishment varies by the power the offender wields. A senator, for example, should have a much higher moral threshold than, say, a comedian. Writing in The New Yorker this week, Masha Gessen treads lightly in making this point, warning that the #MeToo moment could devolve into “sex panic” if we’re not careful. “The distinctions between rape and coercion are meaningful, in the way it is meaningful to distinguish between, say, murder and battery,” Gessen writes.
One’s political ideology or past advocacy doesn’t mean it’s impossible for a person to be victimized by somebody with opposing ideology. But if what she’s written is all she’s got, Morgan’s account reeks of naked political opportunism, of weaponizing victimhood in a way that is so morally bankrupt that it threatens to derail the entire #MeToo conversation for selfish political ends.
(I suppose it also bears mentioning here that while Fox News’ primetime lineup was going up in flames thanks to decades of sexual misconduct coming to light, Morgan was leading the charge to protect men like Bill O’Reilly—who has settled tens of millions of dollars worth of sexual harassment lawsuits during his career—from being fired for what Morgan called “dubious” reasons.)
― grawlix (unperson), Friday, 17 November 2017 00:38 (seven years ago)
WTF with Melanie Morgan, what an attention hog. No that is not the same goddamned thing.
― akm, Friday, 17 November 2017 00:44 (seven years ago)
i just saw that the photographer said that photo was staged and was her idea? maybe that's why franken called for an ethics investigation on himself.
― akm, Friday, 17 November 2017 00:49 (seven years ago)
unnamed twitter rumor though, but who knows.
― akm, Friday, 17 November 2017 00:53 (seven years ago)
tom price flights, no obamacare repeal; al franken bulletproof vest groping, obamacare (individual mandate) repeal / american feudalism?
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 17 November 2017 01:07 (seven years ago)
America notices sex only, I've noticed
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 17 November 2017 02:56 (seven years ago)
I'm sorry, but Donald Trump is really on dangerous territory tweeting about Al Franken
― Dan S, Friday, 17 November 2017 03:14 (seven years ago)
dangerous? feels pretty in his wheelhouse
The Al Frankenstien picture is really bad, speaks a thousand words. Where do his hands go in pictures 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6 while she sleeps? .....— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 17, 2017
― flappy bird, Friday, 17 November 2017 03:16 (seven years ago)
he really wants all of his shit to be dragged up? ok then
― Dan S, Friday, 17 November 2017 03:17 (seven years ago)
I think Donald’s id is tweeting directly while he has an erotic daydream
― attention vampire (MatthewK), Friday, 17 November 2017 03:20 (seven years ago)
xp What could possibly happen to him? They won't impeach him. He has nothing to lose re: piling on sexual assault allegations.
― flappy bird, Friday, 17 November 2017 03:22 (seven years ago)
He knows no one's gonna call him on his own shit, and he sees an opportunity to damage an enemy = standard Trump
― Οὖτις, Friday, 17 November 2017 03:25 (seven years ago)
but I think it's only a matter of time before the focus of this turns to him, at least I hope
― Dan S, Friday, 17 November 2017 03:27 (seven years ago)
Remember when we had Presidents who could spell "Frankenstein"?
I miss that.
― to fly across the city and find Aerosmith's car (C. Grisso/McCain), Friday, 17 November 2017 03:37 (seven years ago)
Not gonna happen Dan, ppl already voted, case closed as far as public + GOP is concerned
― Οὖτις, Friday, 17 November 2017 03:38 (seven years ago)
― Dan S, Thursday, November 16, 2017
nope
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 17 November 2017 03:41 (seven years ago)
That’s where he pretty much wants it. There’s no mechanism forcing him to leave at all, might as well be the spotlight of all conversations concurrently.
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Friday, 17 November 2017 03:41 (seven years ago)
just sitting here agog at "al frankenstien" and the idea that trump actually believes himself to be an actual genius bc of that sickest of burns
― Clay, Friday, 17 November 2017 03:42 (seven years ago)
― Dan S, Friday, 17 November 2017 03:43 (seven years ago)
Hey, it was good enough for Ben Garrison
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Friday, 17 November 2017 03:45 (seven years ago)
tbf he also dropped “short and fat” this week, whaddaya think of that? ZING
― attention vampire (MatthewK), Friday, 17 November 2017 03:45 (seven years ago)
Trump was fucking jerking off when he wrote that, wasn't he
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Friday, 17 November 2017 03:56 (seven years ago)
it's still funnier than Franken's original "joke"
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 17 November 2017 03:57 (seven years ago)
Ryan Lizza on the Trump-Russia strategy of death by attrition:
https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-gops-boil-the-frog-strategy-to-save-trump
Which, I guess that's what you do if that's your best option. But I think Lizza is minimizing the impact the Starr report had when it eventually came out. Clinton did get impeached. And Gore couldn't muster support for Clinton Part III, so he spent his whole campaigning running away from Clinton and confusing his own message. It's not like there was no price to pay for it all.
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Friday, 17 November 2017 04:53 (seven years ago)
what upset me most about that Al Franken photo was that she was asleep. it is making a joke out of non consensual sexual acts. this was really unprofessional for a public representative.
plus this was 2 years after Abu Grahib, the jokey sexual humiliation and exploitation of prisoners of war by US forces. this was 2 years after we rightly made a huge deal out of that.
the Frankenstein thing works on two levels, one his name and two, his hands being out and him acting like a monster.
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 17 November 2017 04:55 (seven years ago)
Clinton was president for 8 years. Good luck to Trump if this continues unfolding for 7 years at the rate it's gone so far.
― Moodles, Friday, 17 November 2017 05:02 (seven years ago)
xp also antisemitic -stein suffix
― flappy bird, Friday, 17 November 2017 05:46 (seven years ago)
Have found out that the photograph of Al Franken was *not* by Al’s brother, who nevertheless was one of the official photographers on the USO tour.
Do we know who did take it?
― kim jong deal (suzy), Friday, 17 November 2017 09:03 (seven years ago)
Benny Hill
― Mark G, Friday, 17 November 2017 09:11 (seven years ago)
can’t imagine why anyone would want to establish a hierarchy between trump’s “joke” and franken’s photo
*reads post author* ohhhhhhh
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Friday, 17 November 2017 10:37 (seven years ago)
Perpetual War politics: as with the Cong in Vietnam, if the US kills you, you're obviously ISIS:"Between April 2016 and June 2017, we visited the sites of nearly 150 airstrikes across northern Iraq, not long after ISIS was evicted from them. We toured the wreckage; we interviewed hundreds of witnesses, survivors, family members, intelligence informants and local officials; we photographed bomb fragments, scoured local news sources, identified ISIS targets in the vicinity and mapped the destruction through satellite imagery. We also visited the American air base in Qatar where the coalition directs the air campaign. There, we were given access to the main operations floor and interviewed senior commanders, intelligence officials, legal advisers and civilian-casualty assessment experts. We provided their analysts with the coordinates and date ranges of every airstrike — 103 in all — in three ISIS-controlled areas and examined their responses. The result is the first systematic, ground-based sample of airstrikes in Iraq since this latest military action began in 2014."We found that *one in five of the coalition strikes we identified resulted in civilian death, a rate more than 31 times that acknowledged by the coalition. It is at such a distance from official claims that, in terms of civilian deaths, this may be the least transparent war in recent American history.* Our reporting, moreover, revealed a consistent failure by the coalition to investigate claims properly or to keep records that make it possible to investigate the claims at all. While some of the civilian deaths we documented were a result of proximity to a legitimate ISIS target, many others appear to be the result simply of flawed or outdated intelligence that conflated civilians with combatants. In this system, Iraqis are considered guilty until proved innocent. Those who survive the strikes, people like Basim Razzo, remain marked as possible ISIS sympathizers, with no discernible path to clear their names."https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/11/16/magazine/uncounted-civilian-casualties-iraq-airstrikes.html🕸
― wow. that was truly the minecraft of sex. (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 17 November 2017 11:47 (seven years ago)
good mourning
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 17 November 2017 11:56 (seven years ago)
throwdown
“When the Republicans are in power, the first thing they want to do is give tax cuts to the rich. That’s just what’s — it’s in their DNA,” Brown said.
“I’ve been here working my whole stinking career for people who don’t have a chance. And I really resent anybody saying that I’m just doing this for the rich. Give me a break,” Hatch said. “I think you guys overplay that all the time and it gets old. And frankly you ought to quit it.”
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/senate-gop-tax-reform-shouting-match-sherrod-brown-orrin-hatch/
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 17 November 2017 15:55 (seven years ago)
Lots of revealing things in that hatch quoteHe knows his career stinks. He knows his constituents don’t have a chance. He acknowledges that there is an element of Republicans doing things for the rich, it’s just that it’s “overplayed” in his opinion.
― Karl Malone, Friday, 17 November 2017 16:03 (seven years ago)
He isn’t just doing things for the rich, he’s only like 92% doing things for the rich, and he’s sick of people pretending like it’s 100%.
― Karl Malone, Friday, 17 November 2017 16:05 (seven years ago)
"My whole stinking career"
― nashwan, Friday, 17 November 2017 16:07 (seven years ago)
A move I am sick of that Republicans will never stop using: "I am ghastly offended that you accuse me of acting in bad faith." The fuckin' bon homie in the Senate means that will always work.
― voodoo chili, Friday, 17 November 2017 16:08 (seven years ago)
such an old tactic, that's one that goes back 100s of years
― Οὖτις, Friday, 17 November 2017 16:23 (seven years ago)
"How dare you impugn the character of a Southern Gentleman, good sah" etc
Maverick makin noises:
MCCAIN: TAX BILL IS NOT REGULAR ORDERvia @caitlinnowens: https://t.co/ACFTsEVM9e(Zero hearings, so he's right!) pic.twitter.com/OUNMkhiCSU— Topher Spiro (@TopherSpiro) November 17, 2017
― Οὖτις, Friday, 17 November 2017 16:26 (seven years ago)
MURKOWSKI says Alexander-Murray “absolutely must” become law before she supports repealing the Obamacare mandate. https://t.co/FzViBIe6Um pic.twitter.com/KM65A35OOx— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) November 17, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 17 November 2017 16:49 (seven years ago)
that... doesn't seem likely
― Οὖτις, Friday, 17 November 2017 16:53 (seven years ago)
like no way will Cruz and Lee (and probably Paul) vote for that
And lo, thus it was written about the burning times, in the ancient documents: The hopes of the people turned, yet again, to the women from the cold climates to save them.
― loretta swit happens (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 17 November 2017 16:55 (seven years ago)
man, run of the mill obamacare-hating conservatives must hate mccain, collins, and murkowski with the strength of a 1000 burning suns, right?
― Karl Malone, Friday, 17 November 2017 16:58 (seven years ago)
well duh
― Οὖτις, Friday, 17 November 2017 17:00 (seven years ago)
Here we go again!
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 17 November 2017 17:01 (seven years ago)
re: the Alexander-Murray bill, is it possible that some of the democrats vote for it? It was originally drafted as a bill to shore up Obamacare, wasn't it?
― Dan S, Friday, 17 November 2017 17:01 (seven years ago)
xpostit's a duh, but i never watch cable news or talk to any conservative who knows the names of key senators, so surprisingly i've never seen this burning rage in person
― Karl Malone, Friday, 17 November 2017 17:02 (seven years ago)
I think Democrats would vote for it (probably most of them!) but the bigger issue is whether McConnell will bring it to the floor at all, over the objections of his caucus
― Οὖτις, Friday, 17 November 2017 17:02 (seven years ago)
like if all the Dems support it, and one third of the GOP - is that enough for Blobfish? Or would his caucus turn on him for betraying them?
― Οὖτις, Friday, 17 November 2017 17:03 (seven years ago)
bear in mind that Trump has specifically batted down the Alexander-Murray compromise as acceptable
UNacceptable
I meant
could be wishful thinking but: feel like murkowski (like manchin's "gosh, could the president have been lying" stance) is fundamentally a "no," but via a form of rhetoric that leads the more conservative voters in her state down that path over days or weeks. like sort of play naive at the start, as if the rest of the republicans actually want to make a good tax bill... then sigh sadly at the end, when after a lot of serious thoughtful work they just couldn't get it past that finish line with something that's really Good For Working People In Maine. darn, we'll try again next time! when obviously, from the get-go, the bill is actively hostile to working people in maine. but for some reason you can't just say that - need to seem like a hard-working legislator trying to work together with other people who are committed in good faith to making a serious bill. yadda yadda. so similarly "i can vote for this, once we get the protections in place that will make it work" is basically "i won't vote for this because that will never happen" but maybe it helps make it digestible if you're a voter who really thinks repealing the individual mandate is super important.
collins's rhetoric also seems open to this kind of move but maybe less so.
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Friday, 17 November 2017 17:04 (seven years ago)
probably thinking too hard about it
― global tetrahedron, Friday, 17 November 2017 17:15 (seven years ago)
no I think Dr. C's accurate, they are setting themselves up to take a lot of shit for torpedoing the GOP agenda, so they need to make it look like it was a lot of hard work and serious thinking to get them to that place
― Οὖτις, Friday, 17 November 2017 17:17 (seven years ago)
I endorse this message
https://www.theawl.com/2017/11/dont-win-arguments-win-elections/
― Οὖτις, Friday, 17 November 2017 17:54 (seven years ago)
I don't but then again, I wouldn't.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Friday, 17 November 2017 18:00 (seven years ago)
ohio man fucks
.@BillForOhio, a sitting Ohio Supreme Court justice and Democratic gubernatorial candidate, apparently posted on Facebook about his sexual escapades."In the last fifty years I was sexually intimate with approximately 50 very attractive females." pic.twitter.com/TUNT2IVbTt— Eric Heisig (@eheisig) November 17, 2017
― mookieproof, Friday, 17 November 2017 18:13 (seven years ago)
Remember this guy?
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/rob-goldstone-ready-come-u-s-talk-mueller-n821826?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 17 November 2017 18:14 (seven years ago)
Everyone from the gorgeous personal secretary to Senator Bob Taft (senior). That's quite a range indeed!
― Evan, Friday, 17 November 2017 18:16 (seven years ago)
xpost What the fuck? Bob Taft Senior is a woman?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 17 November 2017 18:18 (seven years ago)
Or man? I'm confused?
https://media4.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2017_28/2068271/170711-rob-goldstone-2009-njs-1042a_f12b30a6a7be922f4b87bb5fdf82198b.nbcnews-ux-600-480.jpg
Gotta say, any guy that looks like this who is living in Bangkok is clearly up to no good.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 17 November 2017 18:19 (seven years ago)
I hear he made it with a redhead girl in a Chevrolet as well.
― loretta swit happens (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 17 November 2017 18:23 (seven years ago)
she was a black-haired beauty with big dark eyes
― mookieproof, Friday, 17 November 2017 18:27 (seven years ago)
they lapped and tied in a true lover's knot, the red rose and the briar
― Οὖτις, Friday, 17 November 2017 18:28 (seven years ago)
In a sworn statement, he averred that he could see paradise by the dashboard light
― loretta swit happens (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 17 November 2017 18:29 (seven years ago)
ICYMI, big Clinton flack very upset at Gillibrand's 'Clinton should've resigned' take
@PhilippeReines
Ken Starr spent $70 million on a consensual blowjob. Senate voted to keep POTUS WJC. But not enough for you @SenGillibrand? Over 20 yrs you took the Clintons’ endorsements, money, and seat. Hypocrite.
Interesting strategy for 2020 primaries. Best of luck.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 17 November 2017 18:32 (seven years ago)
"consensual"
― Οὖτις, Friday, 17 November 2017 18:36 (seven years ago)
I think that BillForOhio guy is saying he slept with Flo from Progressive
― .oO (silby), Friday, 17 November 2017 18:40 (seven years ago)
can’t stop lolling at billforohio’s brave admission of a tender love affair with senator bob taft (senior)
― wow. that was truly the minecraft of sex. (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 17 November 2017 18:43 (seven years ago)
that...is an extremely bad statement, Bill
― omar little, Friday, 17 November 2017 18:47 (seven years ago)
BRAGGIN 2018 for Governor
― President Keyes, Friday, 17 November 2017 18:50 (seven years ago)
Peace, Bill
https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/t/senior-man-gesturing-peace-sign-his-hand-cheerful-looking-camera-isolated-white-background-59719276.jpg
― Evan, Friday, 17 November 2017 18:54 (seven years ago)
Dare I say this? Flo _is_ mega hawt, tho
― loretta swit happens (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 17 November 2017 19:27 (seven years ago)
Much less ambiguity about the polling trend in Alabama now. Things have gotten worse for Moore since the allegations first came out. pic.twitter.com/1cPt1jzvos— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) November 17, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 17 November 2017 19:54 (seven years ago)
such a POS
A tearful Menendez thanked God, his family and the jurors outside the courthouse in Newark, New Jersey, as well as two senators who testified on his behalf as character witnesses, Democrat Cory Booker and Republican Lindsey Graham.
“The way this case started was wrong,” said Menendez, flanked by his grown children. “The way it was investigated was wrong. The way it was prosecuted was wrong. The way it was tried was wrong as well.”
The senator also added a warning to political rivals. “To those who were digging my political grave so they could jump into my seat: I know who you are, and I won’t forget you,” he said.
https://www.politico.com/states/new-jersey/story/2017/11/16/menendez-settles-score-before-reelection-campiagn-116825
Thank you, confused jurors.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 17 November 2017 20:05 (seven years ago)
rule of law in the country has really taken a hit.
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 17 November 2017 20:44 (seven years ago)
nice to see Booker so astutely perceiving that his party's recent momentum is totally in the direction of vouching for guys accused of being massively corrupt.
― evol j, Friday, 17 November 2017 20:46 (seven years ago)
that's why we elected the law and order president! he's on it don't worry xp
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 17 November 2017 20:46 (seven years ago)
now wanna start a poll on which law and order character would make the best president
― wow. that was truly the minecraft of sex. (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 17 November 2017 20:51 (seven years ago)
(the answer is lennie briscoe obv)
the mayor of Jersey City said he'd endorse Menendez for another term, bcz LOL Jersey City.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 17 November 2017 21:07 (seven years ago)
I just assume everybody in Jersey is handed a bribe at birth
― Οὖτις, Friday, 17 November 2017 21:20 (seven years ago)
and a copy of born to run
― wow. that was truly the minecraft of sex. (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 17 November 2017 21:21 (seven years ago)
for office
― Evan, Friday, 17 November 2017 21:23 (seven years ago)
lulz
― loretta swit happens (Ye Mad Puffin), Friday, 17 November 2017 21:32 (seven years ago)
I know that Cory Booker is made up entirely of either kumbayah or the distilled essence of treachery depending on who you talk to but this move makes no sense from either angle.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Friday, 17 November 2017 21:52 (seven years ago)
What's up with this new Sam Clovis Russia stuff?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 17 November 2017 21:53 (seven years ago)
How a conservative group dealt with a fondling charge against a rising GOP star
people, including tony perkins, knew about the ohio state senator for two years
― mookieproof, Friday, 17 November 2017 21:54 (seven years ago)
Sarah Huckster today: “Senator Franken has admitted wrongdoing and the president hasn’t. I think that’s a very clear distinction.”
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Friday, 17 November 2017 21:59 (seven years ago)
snrk
― .oO (silby), Friday, 17 November 2017 22:00 (seven years ago)
AHAHAHA
― kim jong deal (suzy), Friday, 17 November 2017 22:00 (seven years ago)
too true!
― Οὖτις, Friday, 17 November 2017 22:00 (seven years ago)
sounds like a december thread title
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Friday, 17 November 2017 22:03 (seven years ago)
doesn't beat previous contender "nobody knows it but everybody's saying it"
― Οὖτις, Friday, 17 November 2017 22:07 (seven years ago)
MURKOWSKI: Alexander-Murray *NOT* a precondition for her vote; she remains undecided on the tax bill https://t.co/Zvl5rCVUV0— Steven Dennis (@StevenTDennis) November 17, 2017
🤔
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 17 November 2017 22:56 (seven years ago)
i swear the tax cuts will work this time guys
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 17 November 2017 23:34 (seven years ago)
the audacity of hope
― Οὖτις, Friday, 17 November 2017 23:37 (seven years ago)
I finally watched the Orrin Hatch clip. Man, this pustule has been a menace to the public as long as I've paid attention to politics. Can he choke on a turkey bone or be caught with five dead boys?
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 18 November 2017 02:14 (seven years ago)
Surely he’s at least 100 years old
― .oO (silby), Saturday, 18 November 2017 02:18 (seven years ago)
― Dan S, Saturday, 18 November 2017 02:19 (seven years ago)
I’ll never forget “orrinating” from this Newsweek bit during the Clarence Thomas hearingshttp://www.newsweek.com/buzzwords-203554?rx=us
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 18 November 2017 02:48 (seven years ago)
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/17/us/politics/trump-russia-kushner.htmlThe subject line of the email, turned over to Senate investigators, read, “Russian backdoor overture and dinner invite,” according to one person who has seen the message.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Saturday, 18 November 2017 02:52 (seven years ago)
That’s too many double entendres for one day, shut it down
― .oO (silby), Saturday, 18 November 2017 02:58 (seven years ago)
― Dan S, Saturday, 18 November 2017 03:01 (seven years ago)
subject: secret spy stuff, do not share!!!!
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Saturday, 18 November 2017 10:02 (seven years ago)
oh god that's ridiculous. good thing kushner still has security clearance.
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Saturday, 18 November 2017 11:25 (seven years ago)
"I know that Cory Booker is made up entirely of either kumbayah or the distilled essence of treachery depending on who you talk to but this move makes no sense from either angle."
maybe menendez is innocent? I dunno much about tbh
― akm, Saturday, 18 November 2017 18:00 (seven years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DO9X619XUAIfHPP.jpgIs Hope Hicks an alien?
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 19 November 2017 03:13 (seven years ago)
Yes
― Οὖτις, Sunday, 19 November 2017 03:26 (seven years ago)
Instead of tax reform, why not just require every poor and middle class person to send a check for, say, 000 to their favorite rich person.— Barbara Ehrenreich (@B_Ehrenreich) November 18, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 19 November 2017 16:57 (seven years ago)
The GOP has a huge political problem with their tax bill, which is that the public seems to understand it. pic.twitter.com/fo6s3zIj5w— Derek Thompson (@DKThomp) November 19, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Sunday, 19 November 2017 17:23 (seven years ago)
The GOP tax policy for the poor and middle class has always been jam tomorrow, and never jam today.
― A is for (Aimless), Sunday, 19 November 2017 19:09 (seven years ago)
and that’s why phish fans vote democrat
― It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes. (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 20 November 2017 00:02 (seven years ago)
Sen. Jeff Flake(y), who is unelectable in the Great State of Arizona (quit race, anemic polls) was caught (purposely) on “mike” saying bad things about your favorite President. He’ll be a NO on tax cuts because his political career anyway is “toast.”— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 19, 2017
Where do you begin with this one
― frogbs, Monday, 20 November 2017 00:03 (seven years ago)
jeff flake said bad things about eisenhower?
― It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes. (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 20 November 2017 00:09 (seven years ago)
Never occurred to me how much the "extra" twitter characters would offer our "President" in the way of quotation "marks" !
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Monday, 20 November 2017 00:11 (seven years ago)
Jeff Flakey... Al Frankenstein... christ I'm waiting for trump to tweet NO U or YO MAMA SO FAT at someone.
― Stoop Crone (Trayce), Monday, 20 November 2017 00:11 (seven years ago)
that was basically his approach to kim jong-un fyi
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Monday, 20 November 2017 00:32 (seven years ago)
Someone needs to alert Melania of this cyberbully, stat.
― attention vampire (MatthewK), Monday, 20 November 2017 00:35 (seven years ago)
Shoplifting is a very big deal in China, as it should be (5-10 years in jail), but not to father LaVar. Should have gotten his son out during my next trip to China instead. China told them why they were released. Very ungrateful!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 19, 2017
lol he's still on this
― j., Monday, 20 November 2017 03:20 (seven years ago)
classy
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Monday, 20 November 2017 03:42 (seven years ago)
well it hits upon his two favorite black people tropes (ungrateful + criminals) so I suspect he'll be on it for a while
― frogbs, Monday, 20 November 2017 04:12 (seven years ago)
Also they're good at sports.
― to fly across the city and find Aerosmith's car (C. Grisso/McCain), Monday, 20 November 2017 04:31 (seven years ago)
There are not two more media figures that deserve each other than Trump and LaVar Ball.
― earlnash, Monday, 20 November 2017 04:31 (seven years ago)
It's one of the more peculiar bits of genius Trump's pulled off--He's this "famous for 'being famous'" guy who's really connected with his base by dissing and feuding with genuinely talented people.
― to fly across the city and find Aerosmith's car (C. Grisso/McCain), Monday, 20 November 2017 04:44 (seven years ago)
and LaVar Ball too
― frogbs, Monday, 20 November 2017 04:46 (seven years ago)
Definitely a nexus of horsexxxt when those two tango, hopefully they go all in.
― earlnash, Monday, 20 November 2017 04:51 (seven years ago)
I read Dave Weigel of the Washington Post tweet that not a single Democratic Senator was on the talk show circuit Sunday (and thus only Republicans got to talk about the tax bills)
― curmudgeon, Monday, 20 November 2017 05:42 (seven years ago)
I’ve been told all my life the Sunday talk shows exist but i have never ever seen one; I don’t think I know anyone who has.
― .oO (silby), Monday, 20 November 2017 06:18 (seven years ago)
They exist mainly to provide pull-quotes for news articles and sound bites for television news. Also, to fulfill public service programming in time slots that wouldn't sell ads anyway. As I understand it only political junkies ever watch them.
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 20 November 2017 06:22 (seven years ago)
Political Junkies who are--if the non-PSA commercials are to be believed--also in the market for prescription and/OTC drugs with side effects including vomiting, diahrrea, constipation, blurry vision, suicidal thoughts, and errections lasting more than four hours.
― to fly across the city and find Aerosmith's car (C. Grisso/McCain), Monday, 20 November 2017 06:31 (seven years ago)
eh, aren't the ads all about how Archer Daniels Midland is saving the world, etc?
― President Keyes, Monday, 20 November 2017 14:06 (seven years ago)
I misread this very badly
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Monday, 20 November 2017 14:15 (seven years ago)
― crüt, Monday, 20 November 2017 15:05 (seven years ago)
also in the market for prescription and/OTC drugs with side effects including vomiting, diahrrea, constipation, blurry vision, suicidal thoughts, and errections lasting more than four hours.
coincidentally also the side effects of watching Sunday political talk shows
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 20 November 2017 15:17 (seven years ago)
my dad and i would yell at each other about Reagan in the '80s when the Sunday shows were on, and my mom would literally run in and turn the TV off.
good times
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Monday, 20 November 2017 15:28 (seven years ago)
http://images.rcp.realclearpolitics.com/329890_5_.jpg
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 November 2017 15:37 (seven years ago)
pbs fridays -- shields and (boo!) brooks -- is where it's at
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 20 November 2017 15:40 (seven years ago)
ok *now* I think Franken could be in real trouble: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2017/11/20/he-put-his-hand-full-fledged-on-my-rear-why-al-franken-is-in-a-lot-more-trouble-now/?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_fix-franken-1040am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.263c95b22692
but we'll see
― Οὖτις, Monday, 20 November 2017 16:08 (seven years ago)
Keystone XL pipeline is a go, kinda
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 November 2017 16:15 (seven years ago)
gross
― Οὖτις, Monday, 20 November 2017 16:16 (seven years ago)
I'm honestly surprised something like this didn't surface sooner
https://www.buzzfeed.com/josephbernstein/sources-mcmaster-mocked-trumps-intelligence-in-a-private
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 November 2017 17:19 (seven years ago)
But these new details reveal that the subject matter of McMaster’s dinner with Catz, which sources tell BuzzFeed News took place on July 18 at the Washington, D.C., restaurant Tosca, ranged far from geopolitics. Indeed, three of the sources said that McMaster disparaged multiple members of the administration to Catz, including Tillerson, Secretary of Defense James Mattis, former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon, and President Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner. Of Kushner, one source told BuzzFeed News, McMaster said he had no business being in the White House and should not be involved in national security issues.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 November 2017 17:20 (seven years ago)
Of Kushner, one source told BuzzFeed News, McMaster said he had no business being in the White House and should not be involved in national security issues.
what's sad is that this isn't even remotely controversial to anyone outside of the trump family.
― Karl Malone, Monday, 20 November 2017 17:33 (seven years ago)
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-values-that-values-voters-care-about-most-are-policies-not-character-traits/
this seems like something that should be obvious but maybe isn't
― k3vin k., Monday, 20 November 2017 17:40 (seven years ago)
Oh this is a crazy deep dive
https://www.gq.com/story/inside-rand-pauls-neighborhood-fight
Like most everyone else in the Rivergreen development, Goodwin told me, Boucher pays in the ballpark of $150 a month for professional landscaping, while Paul insists on maintaining his yard himself. Goodwin said that part of what nagged at Boucher was the difference in grass length between his lawn and that of his libertarian neighbor's. "He had his yard sitting at a beautiful two-and-a-half, three inches thick, where Rand cuts it to the nub," Goodwin said.Also at issue, according to Goodwin, is Paul's tendency to mow outward at the edge of his property, spraying his clippings into Boucher's yard. Boucher, he said, has asked Paul to instead mow inward when near the boundary line, and even sought help from the Rivergreen Homeowners Association but has gotten no relief.
Also at issue, according to Goodwin, is Paul's tendency to mow outward at the edge of his property, spraying his clippings into Boucher's yard. Boucher, he said, has asked Paul to instead mow inward when near the boundary line, and even sought help from the Rivergreen Homeowners Association but has gotten no relief.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 November 2017 17:43 (seven years ago)
Elsewhere in the White House
As if we needed more evidence that trickle-down economics are a scam. https://t.co/GvagiFRRiM pic.twitter.com/qrOvhyNXCS— Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@RepJayapal) November 20, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 November 2017 17:45 (seven years ago)
Wouldn't the principled libertarian perspective be that, just as Paul's right to fling his fists stops at the end of his neighbor's nose, his right to spew his grass clippings hither and thither stops at the sacred line dividing their properties?
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 20 November 2017 17:53 (seven years ago)
And libertarians are nothing if not consistent in exercising their logically-airtight principles.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Monday, 20 November 2017 17:55 (seven years ago)
hahahahaha that excerpt Ned posted
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Monday, 20 November 2017 17:57 (seven years ago)
This strikes me as a stretch. A few people said Catz said that McMaster said this. Everyone in actual attendance denies it was said and Catz denies telling anyone it was. https://t.co/x5csfh18gV— Susan Hennessey (@Susan_Hennessey) November 20, 2017
would love if some anti-mcmaster bannon holdover (or, even better, kushner) leaked an untrue story whose details show that the source thinks trump is stupid
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 20 November 2017 18:00 (seven years ago)
learning that RP is apparently a good tipper disturbs me in that I no longer completely hate him
― Simon H., Monday, 20 November 2017 18:02 (seven years ago)
A viable story in national politics hinges on grass length? Okay. Whatevs.
If the blades are short, you must report. If the clippings blow out, it's time to shout.
― you had better come correct (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 20 November 2017 18:04 (seven years ago)
Has anyone made the joke yet that the Rand Paul fight gave new meaning to the term “petty bourgeois”?
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Monday, 20 November 2017 18:22 (seven years ago)
Atlas Mowed
― you had better come correct (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 20 November 2017 18:24 (seven years ago)
honestly now that the severity of the injuries and assault is clearer I don't find the story funny anymore. the descriptions in the GQ piece are savage
― Simon H., Monday, 20 November 2017 18:27 (seven years ago)
it's still funny
― Οὖτις, Monday, 20 November 2017 18:28 (seven years ago)
given the amount of actual physical suffering on the part of the populace that this dude is responsible for, I consider it karma
― Οὖτις, Monday, 20 November 2017 18:29 (seven years ago)
The next paragraph after the ones I quoted:
Goodwin recalled picking up Boucher, a devout Catholic, at his home after church one Sunday afternoon several years ago. Boucher had confronted Paul about his yard-maintenance practices a few minutes before Goodwin's arrival, to no avail, and Goodwin saw Boucher grow agitated as they both watched Paul blow grass onto his lawn. "I've asked him and I've asked him and I've asked him," Goodwin recalls Boucher fuming. "How long can you sit there taking someone plucking a hair out of your nose?" Goodwin asked. "How long could you take that before losing your temper?"
How long has this been going on, indeed.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 November 2017 18:30 (seven years ago)
two bad neighbors
― Οὖτις, Monday, 20 November 2017 18:32 (seven years ago)
Meantime, this guy
http://ijr.com/2017/11/1020133-exclusive-30-sources-expose-sexually-explicit-evidence-harassment-ohio-gop-rep-wes-goodman/
Per another comment: "Best bit is when someone texted Goodman about his room # so they could close his bar tab, but he misunderstood and wrote back with the number and a ;)"
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 20 November 2017 18:33 (seven years ago)
President Donald Trump said Sunday a final decision would come this week on whether to maintain a ban on importing elephant hunting trophies from two African countries, indicating he was leaning toward keeping the Obama-era rules in place.
"Big-game trophy decision will be announced next week but will be very hard pressed to change my mind that this horror show in any way helps conservation of Elephants or any other animal," Trump wrote on Twitter Sunday night.
...Criticism from allies who have big platforms on the right clearly moved the needle. Conservative radio host Michael Savage, who is very popular with the Trump base, and Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham, who recently published a pro-Trump book, both spoke out against getting rid of the Obama-era policy. - Washington Post
So Michael Savage and Laura Ingraham care about elephants? Kinda surprised (figured elephants were dispensable to them) Maybe cuz the animal is a symbol of the Republican party...
― curmudgeon, Monday, 20 November 2017 18:36 (seven years ago)
tbf to Boucher, if he'd asked Paul numerous times to change what he was doing, and the solution was as simple as turning the mower around and mowing the edge going the opposite direction, then every time Paul went the 'wrong' direction he was pointedly saying "fuck you" to his neighbor. depending on how often Paul mowed, that's a lot of "fuck you". otoh, a "devout Catholic" should have turned the other cheek.
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 20 November 2017 18:51 (seven years ago)
on a more topical note, what or who is going to save us from this egregious republican tax bill?
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 20 November 2017 18:56 (seven years ago)
Big-game trophy decision will be announced next week but will be very hard pressed to change my mind that this horror show in any way helps conservation of Elephants or any other animal," Trump wrote on Twitter Sunday night.
Donald J. Trump otm
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 November 2017 18:58 (seven years ago)
Whoever wrote that for DJT otm.
― nickn, Monday, 20 November 2017 19:10 (seven years ago)
Can’t tell which one of about six threads this ones should go into, but the stock photo for the “Antifa” character here looks far more like a ninja/terrorist from some late 80s video game advert than any actual Antifa kid you’re going to run into.
NRA magazine staying on brand with half-informed scare tactics in defense of white authoritarian rule https://t.co/H7Hu5P11cv pic.twitter.com/YqgFIf06KL— nebraska antifa (@antifa_ne) November 20, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Monday, 20 November 2017 19:51 (seven years ago)
https://i.imgur.com/G0uvHRb.png(ninja gaiden, NES)
― Karl Malone, Monday, 20 November 2017 19:54 (seven years ago)
https://www.lukiegames.com/assets/images/PS2/ps2_smugglers_run_p_xlm0kn.jpg
― Evan, Monday, 20 November 2017 19:57 (seven years ago)
Antifa 7800
https://arcryphongames.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/ninjagolf_front.jpg
― Evan, Monday, 20 November 2017 19:58 (seven years ago)
hey everyone, i don't post much here these days, i'm like a month behind on these threads, BORN TO DIE, WORLD IS A FUCK, etc
just popping by to say FRANKEN MUST GO
peace
― goole, Monday, 20 November 2017 20:05 (seven years ago)
Even as someone who has as at least many criticisms of Bernie as I do reasons to like him, his saying Franken should stay on was a disappointment. (Of course, that was before these latest allegations came to light, so he may change his tune yet.)
― Simon H., Monday, 20 November 2017 20:08 (seven years ago)
http://www.andysowards.com/blog/assets/old-retro-video-game-magazine-ninja-gaiden.jpeg
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Monday, 20 November 2017 20:13 (seven years ago)
hi goole, nice to see you
― sleeve, Monday, 20 November 2017 20:18 (seven years ago)
https://images.sftcdn.net/images/t_optimized,f_auto/p/68cdc740-9b34-11e6-a5fb-00163ec9f5fa/2699472581/clumsy-ninja-screenshot.jpg
― you had better come correct (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 20 November 2017 20:31 (seven years ago)
/Big-game trophy decision will be announced next week but will be very hard pressed to change my mind that this horror show in any way helps conservation of Elephants or any other animal," Trump wrote on Twitter Sunday night./Donald J. Trump otm
― It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes. (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 20 November 2017 20:57 (seven years ago)
rumor has it only fresh ivory can hold together 2scoops spiral combover :(
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 20 November 2017 21:17 (seven years ago)
He's probably got all his elephant trophies in the country during the ten minutes that the ban was lifted.
― Mark G, Monday, 20 November 2017 21:21 (seven years ago)
For everyone supporting child sex predator @MooreSenate, we just got some new #MAGA style hats in stock for you. For everyone else, support @GDouglasJones on 12/12 and drop him a donation today: https://t.co/rfWT4wOrx7 #NoMoorePredators #ALsen pic.twitter.com/QiVdAR5RSH— Democratic Coalition (@TheDemCoalition) November 20, 2017
― mookieproof, Monday, 20 November 2017 22:05 (seven years ago)
oh ffs
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Monday, 20 November 2017 22:09 (seven years ago)
Dear Democrats: stop fucking up
that's just some outside group, not an actual party organization
― Οὖτις, Monday, 20 November 2017 22:11 (seven years ago)
They are still calling themselves Democrats and they are still fucking up.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Monday, 20 November 2017 22:13 (seven years ago)
I mean, you could take the high road, but why let republicans have all the fun of wading through waist-deep shit?
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Monday, 20 November 2017 22:33 (seven years ago)
this is p stupid but it's not anywhere close to the depths of the "Bernie Bernstein" robocall, gimme a break
― Οὖτις, Monday, 20 November 2017 22:42 (seven years ago)
incompetence and evil, our perennial choice
― goole, Monday, 20 November 2017 22:46 (seven years ago)
This account is...odd:
C'mon, Alabama, we can't send a child sex predator to the US Senate. Support @GDouglasJones on 12/12 and drop him a donation today: https://t.co/rfWT4wOrx7 #NoMoorePredators #ALsen pic.twitter.com/qLIORVPdv5— Democratic Coalition (@TheDemCoalition) November 20, 2017
C'mon, Alabama, we can't send a child sex predator to the US Senate. Support @GDouglasJones on 12/12 and drop him a donation today: https://t.co/rfWT4wOrx7 #NoMoorePredators #ALsen pic.twitter.com/Z4w84Mx4J4— Democratic Coalition (@TheDemCoalition) November 20, 2017
And seems mainly there to re-post one guy
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Monday, 20 November 2017 23:27 (seven years ago)
i prefer to categorize the choices as the Horrible and the Miserable per Alvy S
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Monday, 20 November 2017 23:38 (seven years ago)
I mean, you could take the high road, but why let republicans have all the fun of wading through waist-deep shit electoral victories?
― grawlix (unperson), Monday, 20 November 2017 23:39 (seven years ago)
hey the substitute teacher was in today
Sarah Huckabee Sanders is having reporters say what they’re thankful for before asking her questions & @CeciliaVega says, “I am thankful for the First Amendment.” pic.twitter.com/WiCTT4xoxI— Sarah Lerner (@SarahLerner) November 20, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Monday, 20 November 2017 23:47 (seven years ago)
I like all the “civility politics are good now” responses to the hat making fun of Roy Moore.
― Nerdstrom Poindexter, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 00:00 (seven years ago)
Sarah Sanders says that reporters who are called on must say what they're thankful for before they can ask a question.— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) November 20, 2017
“I’m thankful none of my brothers abused a dog.”— Fiorello La Garbagecan (@StuntBirdArmy) November 20, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Tuesday, 21 November 2017 00:33 (seven years ago)
Hahaha
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 00:42 (seven years ago)
She Said That A Powerful Congressman Harassed Her. Here’s Why You Didn’t Hear Her Story. https://www.buzzfeed.com/paulmcleod/she-complained-that-a-powerful-congressman-harassed-her?utm_term=.djQOkXgDm
― horseshoe, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 03:20 (seven years ago)
Yellen’s departure from the Fed long before her term as a governor ends in 2024 gives President Donald Trump another big opportunity to shape the world’s most important central bank.
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/20/yellen-announces-resignation-from-fed-179399
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 14:16 (seven years ago)
ME: Joe, about halfway through the speech, I’m gonna wish you a happy birth--BIDEN: IT’S MY BIRTHDAY!ME: Joe. Happy birthday to @JoeBiden, my brother and the best vice president anybody could have. pic.twitter.com/sKbXjNiEjH— Barack Obama (@BarackObama) November 20, 2017
He's got the most retweets, the best retweets. Way more than fake Trump. Sad!
― Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 15:53 (seven years ago)
Birthday Forgeddin' Joe Biden
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 21 November 2017 15:56 (seven years ago)
Adam Serwer: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/the-nationalists-delusion/546356/
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 November 2017 16:43 (seven years ago)
does anyone know how many republicans who signed grover norquist's tax pledge have voted so far this november to raise taxes?
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 21 November 2017 17:25 (seven years ago)
All but 13 of them
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 17:53 (seven years ago)
Litterally every GOP Senator and Rep has signed that
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 17:54 (seven years ago)
re the Serwer piece
We need to talk about economic anxiety. [Thread]There's this prevalent notion that "economic anxiety" is exclusively a pretext for racism. As proof, @AdamSerwer, notes that Trump voters were proportionally wealthier than HRC's, & that HRC won the majority of low wage earners. https://t.co/xZv0NIckf9— A Black Populist (@briebriejoy) November 21, 2017
― Simon H., Tuesday, 21 November 2017 18:24 (seven years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPKIqFaX0AAHRAa.jpg
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 18:32 (seven years ago)
I hear Mugabe's looking for work
― JoeStork, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 18:40 (seven years ago)
i wonder how the pepe/MAGA gang is gonna take the repeal of net neutrality. i mean, i know the answer of course, but fun to think about
― global tetrahedron, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 18:50 (seven years ago)
Talking about the economic anxiety of moderately well-off white people who voted for Trump and not taking into account that a large driver for that economic anxiety is "I believe non-white people are talking what is rightfully mine" seems at best naive.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Tuesday, 21 November 2017 18:57 (seven years ago)
― maura, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 19:05 (seven years ago)
er "taking", don't know why that ended up "talking"
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Tuesday, 21 November 2017 19:09 (seven years ago)
djp otm
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Tuesday, 21 November 2017 19:17 (seven years ago)
I don't think that defeats or even directly contradicts her larger point about electoral strategy?
― Simon H., Tuesday, 21 November 2017 19:19 (seven years ago)
Just saw Coates tweet about the Atlantic article. I don't get it, I just read the article, I thought it was pretty clear that it was another "it's actually racism!" articles. Am I misreading the article or it's critiques?
― dan selzer, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 19:50 (seven years ago)
i wonder how the pepe/MAGA gang is gonna take the repeal of net neutrality. i mean, i know the answer of course, but fun to think about― global tetrahedron, Tuesday, November 21, 2017 6:50 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― global tetrahedron, Tuesday, November 21, 2017 6:50 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I feel like they floated a trial balloon about this a few months ago and the pepe crowd were fuckin pissed about it.. we'll see.
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Tuesday, 21 November 2017 19:55 (seven years ago)
net neutrality repeal has been a possibility for a number of years but has failed to happen. can someone tell me why it seems so imminent now and why this potential FCC move is different from the times it's almost happened in the past?
― marcos, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 20:03 (seven years ago)
nevermind i'll take it to the more specific thread!
― marcos, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 20:06 (seven years ago)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPLxX78XcAALM-J.jpg
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 20:44 (seven years ago)
Would he go so far as to describe it as ... a very special episode?
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 20:48 (seven years ago)
levity on this day?
Same, Melania. Same. pic.twitter.com/qUdetHY8ZQ— dorsey.mp4 (@dorseyshaw) November 21, 2017
― YouTube_-_funy_cats.flv (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 21 November 2017 21:22 (seven years ago)
"He is in total denial. I do have to say, 40 years is a long time. He has run eight races and this has never come up. So 40 years is a long time," Trump said. "The women are Trump voters. Most of them are Trump voters. All you can do is you have to do what you have to do. He totally denies it."
― Number None, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 22:09 (seven years ago)
the end part of Trump's quote was " I’m very happy it’s being exposed."
like.....did you hear how that sounded coming out of...y'know what I'm done.
― fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 21 November 2017 22:23 (seven years ago)
all you can do is you have to do what you have to do
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 21 November 2017 22:35 (seven years ago)
― fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal),
you're criticizing the English of a man with the command of language of a Hellman's mayo jar?
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 21 November 2017 22:57 (seven years ago)
Trump: "He is in total denial" I'm sure trump didn't mean this the way it actually reads.
― akm, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 23:07 (seven years ago)
I’m amazed he stayed on topic.
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 21 November 2017 23:37 (seven years ago)
Uh he didn’t really, he felt the need to point out the women he molested were Trump voters
― frogbs, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 01:08 (seven years ago)
yes but he didn’t go off on a tear about how LeBron hates America or something. If it was a rally instead of a press conference I suppose it would have gotten really weird.
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 01:11 (seven years ago)
xp that's relevant. he's suggesting that the allegations aren't true. "I do have to say" is the reversal from the first sentiment - it's been a long time and many races and it has never come up before now, and all the women are trump voters (ideologically motivated). i think "All you can do is you have to do what you have to do" means despite not really believing it he feels like he is obligated to use it to make political hay.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 01:13 (seven years ago)
oh lol nm i thought that was a quote about franken carry on
― Mordy, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 01:15 (seven years ago)
Hell of a read.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/congress-sexual-harassment_us_5a1487fae4b03dec8248bc55?een
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 01:35 (seven years ago)
Jesus!! That labyrinthine process involved just to lodge a complaint is really unforgivable and scans as explicitly set up to protect powerful men and keep their disgusting attacks secret.
― Fetchboy, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 02:43 (seven years ago)
Another great day!
Roy Moore mentions Alabama "always stands up for its rights," including the "Civil War conflict."— Jared Yates Sexton (@JYSexton) November 22, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 03:10 (seven years ago)
this fkn guy
― Larry Elleison (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 03:32 (seven years ago)
So ... Murkowski is a yes now? Hope there's some horse trading going on and she's only saying that because she knows enough others will say no.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 04:20 (seven years ago)
Doubt it
― Moodles, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 05:20 (seven years ago)
https://i.imgur.com/R7ecHFD.jpg
― Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 05:22 (seven years ago)
The Trump White House tried to block public access to visitor logs of five federal offices working directly for the president even though they were subject to public disclosure through the Freedom of Information Act. Property of the People, a Washington-based transparency group, successfully sued the administration to release the data and provided the documents to ProPublica. You can search them below.
https://projects.propublica.org/graphics/wh-complex
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 05:31 (seven years ago)
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/11/jared-kushner-horizons-are-collapsing-within-the-west-wing
Despite Kushner’s efforts to project confidence about Robert Mueller’s probe, he expressed worry after the indictments of Paul Manafort and Rick Gates about how far the investigation could go. “Do you think they’ll get the president?” Kushner asked a friend, according to a person briefed on the conversation.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 13:33 (seven years ago)
That kind of poorly sourced rumor is not really trustworthy, but I'll choose to trust it anyway :)
― Frederik B, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 13:41 (seven years ago)
I think the tax bill is gonna pass
― frogbs, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 13:42 (seven years ago)
xpost There's a lot of pretty juicy stuff here, too:
https://www.npr.org/2017/11/21/565654507/journalist-investigating-trump-and-russia-says-full-picture-is-one-of-collusion
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 13:42 (seven years ago)
Maybe we'll get tax bill, the end of net neutrality *and* Roy Moore just in time for the holidays!
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 13:46 (seven years ago)
“Do you think they’ll get the president?” Kushner asked a friend, tugging anxiously at his own collar and visibly perspiring
― It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes. (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 13:52 (seven years ago)
"So, uh, do you know if they're looking at, erm, anyone else? Like, you know, the president, or, um ... anybody else?"
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 14:48 (seven years ago)
It wasn’t the White House, it wasn’t the State Department, it wasn’t father LaVar’s so-called people on the ground in China that got his son out of a long term prison sentence - IT WAS ME. Too bad! LaVar is just a poor man’s version of Don King, but without the hair. Just think..— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 22, 2017
...LaVar, you could have spent the next 5 to 10 years during Thanksgiving with your son in China, but no NBA contract to support you. But remember LaVar, shoplifting is NOT a little thing. It’s a really big deal, especially in China. Ungrateful fool!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 22, 2017
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 14:55 (seven years ago)
meanwhile fucking kids is nbd
― It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes. (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 14:56 (seven years ago)
IT WAS ME
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 15:03 (seven years ago)
kind of shocked to say i cannot find one single image of Doctor Doom calling someone an "ungrateful fool."
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 15:05 (seven years ago)
https://usercontent2.hubstatic.com/4924935_f520.jpg"I don't get no respect..."
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 15:09 (seven years ago)
xp - have this file photo I found instead the caption is ‘washington, november 18: white house chief of staff john f kelly (left) looks on as president donald j trump prepares to send a tweet’https://pics.me.me/do-not-fool-doctor-doom-toots-as-he-pleases-27299746.png
― It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes. (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 15:13 (seven years ago)
ha stevie that’s pretty much exactly what i had in mind
― It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes. (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 15:16 (seven years ago)
"IT WAS ME. Too bad! Ungrateful fool!"
http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/entertainment/20100318_hottub-5scarface.nocrop.w670.h377.jpg
― joygoat, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 15:25 (seven years ago)
I did worry after I posted it that I had a well-earned "That's the jooooke" coming my way
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 15:27 (seven years ago)
the po’ faced absurdity of Donald J. Trump
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 15:40 (seven years ago)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2017/11/22/trumps-team-insists-he-has-a-full-schedule-an-hour-before-he-goes-golfing/?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.3539159614c8
this is pretty amusing. the series of tweets about "meetings" all gathered together kind of sums him up really.
― Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 15:52 (seven years ago)
this guy really likes to golf, huh?
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 15:59 (seven years ago)
you would be too if you could complete 18 holes in 12 shots like trump can
― It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes. (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 16:00 (seven years ago)
the idea of him coming back from golfing or the spa or whatever and composing a tweet about "big meetings!" or "very important meetings!" really betrays a venal, casual and i guess juvenile mixture of disregard and contempt for his role which would be amusing if it wasn't so worrying.
― Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 16:01 (seven years ago)
But not surprising
― Mark G, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 16:03 (seven years ago)
not in the slightest.
― Bein' Sean Bean (LocalGarda), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 16:04 (seven years ago)
lolll BG well done
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 16:06 (seven years ago)
See, I disagree; I read it as desperate insecurity and a massive inferiority complex. He knows he's a piece of shit, he knows he's not up to the job, but he's certainly not going to let everyone else know he knows it, so he bluffs. "I'm doing very important work!" Meanwhile, he's running off to the golf course for a few hours' relief from the reality of his own incompetence.
― grawlix (unperson), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 16:06 (seven years ago)
one of these days we're gonna nail trump psychoanalysis, I can feel it
― Simon H., Wednesday, 22 November 2017 16:07 (seven years ago)
the golf thing, and the compulsion to visit his own resorts, is pretty fuckin weird. it reminds me of how hugh hefner would only ever stay in his own mansion or at "playboy clubs" that he had built in various cities. what does he derive from this? is there a weird compulsion we don't know about? does he not "trust" the white house in some way?
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 16:08 (seven years ago)
my questions, Simon, to clarify, are less about psychoanalysis and more about purely salacious gossip-mongering. there should be vicious, tawdry rumours about what he does at these clubs
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 16:09 (seven years ago)
"He knows he's a piece of shit, he knows he's not up to the job,"
He doesn't think this imo.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 16:12 (seven years ago)
He's not capable of that sort of self-reflection
how hugh hefner would only ever stay in his own mansion or at "playboy clubs"
Well, I mean ...
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 16:16 (seven years ago)
Trump just wants to be in a place where he can show off and pretend he is in control.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 16:17 (seven years ago)
let’s not forget that the trump org gets paid every time trump stays at his own properties too - all the comforts of home and with pocket money provided by the taxpayer
― It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes. (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 16:19 (seven years ago)
tapps everywhere in the whitehouse
― j., Wednesday, 22 November 2017 16:40 (seven years ago)
Democratic Sen. Tom Carper says White House economic adviser Gary Cohn faked a bad connection to get President Trump off the phone so they could have a conversation on tax reform without him https://t.co/qcUnSEsysl— CNN Politics (@CNNPolitics) November 22, 2017
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:06 (seven years ago)
Like, of all the periods when the span of my life could've transpired, why did it have to overlap with a period where the federal government is morphing into a late-period Zucker-Abrams-Zucker production? I could've been comfortably interred in the ground for the past fifty years instead of bearing witness to this.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:20 (seven years ago)
At some point, every warrior eventually runs out of arrows. His armor wears thin yet grows heavier still. He must lay down his weary helmeted head for rest.Even Coriolanus was forced to retreat — at the behest of his mother.Not so Donald Trump.Not a weary drop of blood pumps through the man’s veins. He wears his thick armor light as skin. His bottomless quiver is never empty.
Even Coriolanus was forced to retreat — at the behest of his mother.
Not so Donald Trump.
Not a weary drop of blood pumps through the man’s veins. He wears his thick armor light as skin. His bottomless quiver is never empty.
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:22 (seven years ago)
Ironic, since his quivering bottom is somehow always emptying.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:24 (seven years ago)
Oh wait...that piece is serious.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:25 (seven years ago)
"PS I am wanking as I write this."
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:27 (seven years ago)
i am not going to spend my thanksgiving break creating a fake D&D donald trump character sheet, i am not going to spend my thanksgiving break creating a fake D&D donald trump character sheet, i am not going to spend my thanksgiving break creating a fake D&D donald trump character sheet
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:27 (seven years ago)
gis for bottomless donald trump
― j., Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:32 (seven years ago)
Artist's rendition:
https://www.entertainmentearth.com/images/AUTOIMAGES/DC21024lg.jpg
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:38 (seven years ago)
STR 6DEX 5CON 2INT 1WIS 1LCK 18
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:44 (seven years ago)
let’s not forget that the trump org gets paid every time trump stays at his own properties
As I recall, "That's called being smart."
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:45 (seven years ago)
wait has luck replaced charisma? damned millennials
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:51 (seven years ago)
STR 6DEX 5
― It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes. (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:52 (seven years ago)
i'll give him dexterity for never having gone to jail
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:52 (seven years ago)
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a9/ScroogeFirst.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 17:53 (seven years ago)
wait has luck replaced charisma? damned millennialsOops, it’s still charisma. Still though, those millennials
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 18:00 (seven years ago)
Like, of all the periods when the span of my life could've transpired, why did it have to overlap with a period where the federal government is morphing into a late-period Zucker-Abrams-Zucker production?
The fact that these things overlap is not at all coincidental.
― Moodles, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 18:08 (seven years ago)
Are you suggesting that I'm somehow responsible for the horrific events that are currently unfolding?
I mean, I guess it isn't entirely outside of the realm of possibility.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 18:23 (seven years ago)
it's a democracy, man
you gotta responsibility
― j., Wednesday, 22 November 2017 18:29 (seven years ago)
Whoops!
Roy Moore's communications director has resigned, @elainaplott reports https://t.co/RJQKjIcYn9— Andrew Beaujon (@abeaujon) November 22, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 18:55 (seven years ago)
Don't worry, Roy, the president isn't super busy at the moment, I'm sure he can help you out.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 18:58 (seven years ago)
Roy's response "I don't know what to say..."
― Evan, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 18:59 (seven years ago)
Texas Congressman Joe Barton Apologizes for Sending Nude Pic to Woman, Not His Wife
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 19:01 (seven years ago)
ARGH NSFW, life, my eyes, anything.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 19:02 (seven years ago)
NOOOOOO that pic. Do not look.
― Evan, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 19:03 (seven years ago)
looooool
― marcos, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 19:04 (seven years ago)
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, November 22, 2017 12:38 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Evan, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 19:06 (seven years ago)
Thank u for insta-sterilizing the world with that digital saltpeter, TMZ.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 19:07 (seven years ago)
trump called moore "tough on crime" compared to doug jones, so i guess being blasé about the age of consent is more important to the nation's well-being than putting away members of the kkk
― maura, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 19:09 (seven years ago)
also why are dick pics always captioned in the fucking cheesiest ways. porn has ruined dirty talk
Of course Trump wouldn't want to be put away?
― Evan, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 19:10 (seven years ago)
sounds like barton might be added to this list soon https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/12RhR9oZZpyKKceyLO3C5am84abKzu2XqLWjP2LnQDgI/edit#gid=0
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 19:10 (seven years ago)
https://www.buzzfeed.com/evefairbanks/mark-halperin-poisoned-our-politics?utm_term=.rpLknd9V9#.ufW2b0X8X
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 19:45 (seven years ago)
that was a good read
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 19:52 (seven years ago)
All of these "why are these allegations happening NOW" questions are dumb. Like, no shit someone may feel more urgency to come forward when the person who abused them looks poised to ride easily into the Senate AND the current cultural climate is the least hostile towards victims alleging sexual assault and rape than it has been in most of their lifetimes?
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 19:57 (seven years ago)
Barton should apologize ahead of time for nude selfies
― Evan, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 20:04 (seven years ago)
A friend of mine who was assaulted quite a while back felt told me she felt like a weight had been lifted when the Weinstein story broke; she experienced a palpable wave of validation. xp
― Simon H., Wednesday, 22 November 2017 20:05 (seven years ago)
it is the expected response from the conspiracy theorist mindset coupled with a total lack of understanding of what it's like for a female victim of sexual "transgressions"
xps to mr perry
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 20:07 (seven years ago)
That Halperin piece falls victim to some of the same sins he lays at Halperin's feet. As the author himself says a few paragraphs in, power is so diffuse that there is no small insider's club that runs everything.
Surely, Halperin had influence, but that piece magnifies his influence to the point of distortion. Retailing gossip as news is as old as the yellow press and likening D.C. to the court at Versailles is a trope that dates back almost as far. Halperin didn't invent that world or its rules. He was just another in a long line that runs back through the Alsops and Walter Winchell to others too far back to recall.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 20:12 (seven years ago)
she
― maura, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 20:30 (seven years ago)
re the writer
Yes. You are correct. I made a factual error because I was too lazy to go back and check the byline. My criticism of the author's premise stands.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 20:39 (seven years ago)
what are you thankful for pic.twitter.com/YUFKlF8zGM— Mens-hevik Rights🌹 (@timerube) November 22, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 20:40 (seven years ago)
I can do without pictures, but I love how specific the apologies have to be in Moore-world:
Republican Rep. Joe Barton apologizes for a nude selfie, admitting in a statement that he "had sexual relationships with other mature adult women"
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 21:37 (seven years ago)
he’s a mature woman?
― It happens sometimes. People just explode. Natural causes. (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 21:38 (seven years ago)
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 21:49 (seven years ago)
(I assume he meant "other than my wife")
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 21:50 (seven years ago)
I see your point, Aimless, but the author's argument still stands that obfuscating the workings of our elected government as if it's the star chamber while also diminishing the life-and-limb significance of what goes on is a bad thing and Halperin has always been a wet buttsock for perpetuating that; if his ultimate replacement(s) keep that behavior up while managing to not jerk off in front of their colleagues at work, we're still not going to be doing great as a country.
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 22:05 (seven years ago)
obfuscating the workings of our elected government as if it's the star chamber while also diminishing the life-and-limb significance of what goes on is a bad thing and Halperin has always been a wet buttsock for perpetuating that
Oh, I agree completely with that part.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 22:30 (seven years ago)
(I assume he meant "other than my wife")― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, November 22, 2017 1:50 PM (forty-eight minutes ago)
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, November 22, 2017 1:50 PM (forty-eight minutes ago)
I read it more as "...unlike the other pedophiles and pederasts in the news".
― Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 22:40 (seven years ago)
It's as part of the quote that this happened while he was separated but not divorced from his wife.
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 22:49 (seven years ago)
not gonna look for this Barton pic
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 22 November 2017 23:06 (seven years ago)
good thinking
― Evan, Wednesday, 22 November 2017 23:08 (seven years ago)
Joe Barton's dick can mean something beautifulJoe Barton's dick can mean dreams that are coming true
― fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Thursday, 23 November 2017 00:17 (seven years ago)
A powerful argument that DJT writes his own tweets:
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 23, 2017
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 23 November 2017 12:40 (seven years ago)
specifically that it was in response to
New post:Trump's rage-tweets about LaVar Ball are part of a pattern.Trump regularly attacks high-profile African Americans to feed his supporters' belief that the system is rigged for minorities:https://t.co/vlWbUj10T2— Greg Sargent (@ThePlumLineGS) November 22, 2017
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 23 November 2017 12:41 (seven years ago)
So... he's agreeing?
― Evan, Thursday, 23 November 2017 12:53 (seven years ago)
trump flipped out on one of his own supporters because he’s too stupid to read, then deleted and covered his tracks with a retweet pic.twitter.com/rsqY8oOzOY— 👹 (@HonoredSpirit) November 22, 2017
― voodoo chili, Thursday, 23 November 2017 14:12 (seven years ago)
Thank her, corrupt ass.
― nashwan, Thursday, 23 November 2017 14:27 (seven years ago)
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/11/23/us/politics/flynn-mueller-russia-trump.amp.html
flynn’s legal team has notified trump’s that they can no longer share information, likely indicating they’re at least now discussing cooperation with mueller
― sciatica, Thursday, 23 November 2017 22:32 (seven years ago)
Conspicuously timed thanksgiving announcement
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 23 November 2017 23:18 (seven years ago)
Seth Abrams has thoughts:
(THREAD) Here's a brief itemization of the factual errors in the New York Times' breaking news story, below, about Michael Flynn possibly having signed a cooperation deal with Bob Mueller. The errors are inexplicable, and it's important they be called out. https://t.co/KYQvl4gFpP— Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) November 24, 2017
― Andrew Farrell, Friday, 24 November 2017 08:35 (seven years ago)
Bah, sorry for autocorrect.
Useful thread, crank or not. Especially the implication that if Flynn takes a deal then clearly he is not the primary target, which means Trump and high level associates likely formally in the cross hairs.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 24 November 2017 15:39 (seven years ago)
I am not sure you can assume that when he is alleged to have been bribed by a key strategic ally, tbh. There might be plenty of people worried about the implications for Turkey / US relations, which are already strained, if this went to a full trial. Will be interesting to see either way.
― Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Friday, 24 November 2017 15:50 (seven years ago)
New Yorker fact checker chimes in
no buddy i just think you're a hack https://t.co/MqbKLEz0ui— Talia Lavin (@chick_in_kiev) November 24, 2017
― sciatica, Friday, 24 November 2017 16:50 (seven years ago)
i don't know much about abramson, but why does he keep calling her a "fact-checker" and implying that she actually isn't one? granted, i'm not an "investigator" like he is but she has the little blue checkmark by her name and says she's a fact checker for the new yorker and so i guess i just blindly believe that it's true. sometimes i'm sheeple, i guess
― Karl Malone, Friday, 24 November 2017 16:59 (seven years ago)
his responses sound similar to the guy who was selling bootleg Miami Dolphins jerseys insisting his jerseys were real and that anybody who knew jerseys would never call them fake
― fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Friday, 24 November 2017 17:03 (seven years ago)
circular reasoning, unimpressive appeals to authority, etc
― fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Friday, 24 November 2017 17:05 (seven years ago)
he doubled down and then tripled and quadrupled down on his idea that she's not a fact-checker, and then started a countdown clock to blocking her. what a complete dipshit. occasionally his name pops up here and elsewhere as some sort of authority on trump and russia but based off of this single thread i wouldn't trust him with my laundry
― Karl Malone, Friday, 24 November 2017 17:06 (seven years ago)
he also had the one kneejerk cult follower who then joined the fray to attack the NYT factchecker.
BINGO!
― fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Friday, 24 November 2017 17:08 (seven years ago)
it's such a silly micro-scandal, but just for closure on this, know that seth abramson just blocked the fact checker and then deleted all of his tweets in the exchange
― Karl Malone, Friday, 24 November 2017 17:18 (seven years ago)
he's a nut, right? like mensch?
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 24 November 2017 17:24 (seven years ago)
yes, please stop posting him here.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 24 November 2017 17:32 (seven years ago)
My apologies - posts to ILX don’t constitute approval etc.
― Andrew Farrell, Friday, 24 November 2017 18:07 (seven years ago)
tbf this is a tough bar to clear
― Simon H., Friday, 24 November 2017 18:10 (seven years ago)
Leandra English
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 24 November 2017 22:03 (seven years ago)
A statement by the President: pic.twitter.com/kv001qqPcT— Real Press Sec. (@RealPressSecBot) November 24, 2017
uh, go ahead and name him man of the year and then use the article to take a shit all over him imo.
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 25 November 2017 02:23 (seven years ago)
Colin Kaepernick, then?
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 25 November 2017 02:53 (seven years ago)
(as POTY - that was not in any way a response to KM's post above)
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Saturday, 25 November 2017 03:06 (seven years ago)
Meanwhile, the crisis at State Department worsens.
I didn't know this!
Mrs. Clinton and John Kerry, her successor, were both seen as focused on their own priorities and were not particularly popular within the department. The model secretaries in recent history have been Colin Powell, James A. Baker III and George P. Shultz, Republicans who cared about management.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 25 November 2017 12:22 (seven years ago)
One interesting detail in our look at Sessions tenure so far pic.twitter.com/64Wol3AGCq— Matt Zapotosky (@mattzap) November 24, 2017
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 25 November 2017 13:15 (seven years ago)
I guess it wouldn't help to point out that the area from which Sessions's family traces its lineage is pretty fucking famous for taking up arms against the United States of America. It's pretty much their jam.
― you had better come correct (Ye Mad Puffin), Saturday, 25 November 2017 13:47 (seven years ago)
Where’s that piece of shit Tillerson from? Oh right, fucking Texas.
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 25 November 2017 14:52 (seven years ago)
Whether they thought Hillary was a careerist schmuck or not, they still lined the hallways and cheered when she took the job in 2009. Because it meant being allowed to do their job again. Ref: http://edition.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/22/hillary.clinton.labott/index.htmlI, uh, strongly doubt that Colin Powell is remembered that fondly.
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 25 November 2017 14:57 (seven years ago)
from which country does their family trace its lineage?”the woke racist, by j sessions
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 25 November 2017 14:57 (seven years ago)
I mean that line Alfred quoted is such a piece of tossed-off typical NYT bothsides daddy-knows-best bullshit - yeah, guys who lie at the UN and abet torture are really popular for their management style. Fuck you.
― El Tomboto, Saturday, 25 November 2017 15:01 (seven years ago)
NYT:
Something deeper has been consuming Mr. Trump. He sees the calls for Mr. Moore to step aside as a version of the response to the now-famous “Access Hollywood” tape, in which he boasted about grabbing women’s genitalia, and the flood of groping accusations against him that followed soon after. He suggested to a senator earlier this year that it was not authentic, and repeated that claim to an adviser more recently. (In the hours after it was revealed in October 2016, Mr. Trump acknowledged that the voice was his, and he apologized.)
So Mr. Trump has been particularly open to the idea, pushed by Mr. Moore’s defenders, that the candidate is being wrongly accused, even as Mr. McConnell and a parade of other Republicans have said they believe the accusers. When a group of senators gathered with the president in the White House last week to discuss the tax overhaul, it took little to get Mr. Trump onto the topic of Mr. Moore — and he immediately offered up the same it-was-40-years-ago defense, according to officials at the meeting.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 25 November 2017 22:53 (seven years ago)
trump just tweeted about how bad cnn (international) is, again. in the midst of the time-warner / at&t controversy. he just can't help it, he truly can't
― Karl Malone, Saturday, 25 November 2017 23:11 (seven years ago)
Someone should murder him take away his phone
― .oO (silby), Saturday, 25 November 2017 23:34 (seven years ago)
I'm rooting for the cerebral aneurysm. It would spare our country so much.
― Sanpaku, Sunday, 26 November 2017 00:53 (seven years ago)
No, it wouldn't.
― Simon H., Sunday, 26 November 2017 00:57 (seven years ago)
Pence would pack the courts, but at least 30% of the country doesn't have messianic beliefs about him.
― Sanpaku, Sunday, 26 November 2017 01:01 (seven years ago)
I'm still rooting for dying on the shitter while tweeting - not because it would do anything good but just out of some small hope for the existence of cosmic justice.
― louise ck (milo z), Sunday, 26 November 2017 01:31 (seven years ago)
There is no substantive difference between Pence and Trump, other than Pence has devised a so-stupid-it’s-clever means of avoiding being accused of sexual harassment and assault, and the same clenched-anus attitude is what keeps him out of the Russia shit. Pence seems to be just as likely to trade all our grandmothers and children away for a new war machine, get baited into a crusade against North Korea, and more likely to let Mitch & Paul pass decimating legislation without meddling and tweeting everything to death. So I’d keep Trump, actually.
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 26 November 2017 01:33 (seven years ago)
lmao I've been making that argument for months and almost always get pilloried for it
― Simon H., Sunday, 26 November 2017 01:41 (seven years ago)
(not On Here just in general)
― Simon H., Sunday, 26 November 2017 01:42 (seven years ago)
Honestly I don’t think I’d given it much thought until just now, because fuck spending time thinking about mike pence.
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 26 November 2017 01:45 (seven years ago)
Pence is a garden variety Republican, albeit of the evangelical fringe of American life. I despise him too, but Pence is certainly not in the Bannon camp that wants a race war now rather than later.
What some of you aren't getting is that there are some well armed people who will respond to impeachment/conviction of Trump with violence against government and minorities. Faith in Trump has a religious nature. Better that Trump die of natural causes, to eliminate the messianism going forward.
― Sanpaku, Sunday, 26 November 2017 01:54 (seven years ago)
Best case scenario is Dems take at least one chamber in 2018, and then Trump dies of natural causes shortly thereafter.
― Οὖτις, Sunday, 26 November 2017 01:56 (seven years ago)
Trump dying/getting removed/whatever gives Repubs a tidy "back to business as usual" narrative a lot of people outside of the Trumpdead-enders would find comforting, I think.
― Simon H., Sunday, 26 November 2017 01:56 (seven years ago)
What some of you aren't getting is that there are some well armed people who will respond to impeachment/conviction of Trump with violence against government and minorities.
yeah, i agree. it's possible that it's going to get really ugly (much worse than today) after trump goes, no matter how he goes - by impeachment, resigning, managing to finish out a shitty term with very few accomplishments. there was a decent frank rich piece that talked about that a couple weeks ago:
What we should be worrying about instead is the remarkable staying power of the American voters who put these guys in office. They’re in for the long game no matter the fate of the current administration. Trumpism predates Trump and Pence by decades and is a more powerful, enduring, and scary force than either of them. Trump learned this himself the hard way when Alabama Republicans voting in the Senate primary this fall chose the more Trumpist candidate, the gun-totin’ crackpot bigot and alleged sexual predator Roy Moore, over Mitch McConnell’s candidate, the garden-variety right-winger Trump had impulsively and mistakenly endorsed. The toxic anger that defines Trumpism — a rage at America’s cultural and economic elites in both political parties as well as at minorities and immigrants — will only grow darker and fiercer once its namesake leaves office, no matter how he does so. If Trump departs involuntarily, his followers will elevate him to martyrdom as the victim of a coup perpetrated by the scoundrels of “fake news” and “the swamp.” If Trump serves one or two full terms, his base will still be livid because he will not have bestowed the lavish gifts he promised, from a Rust Belt manufacturing comeback to a border wall. His voters won’t pin these failures on Trump but on the same swamp creatures they’ll hold responsible if he’s run out of office. They’re already blaming the cratering of “repeal and replace” and other broken Trump promises on what Bannon and his allies call “the McConnell-industrial complex.”
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/11/frank-rich-trumpism-after-trump.html
― Karl Malone, Sunday, 26 November 2017 02:01 (seven years ago)
xpost - Uh, OK dude. IMO Trump dying in office could give the GOP a pass for nominating him. Not in favor. Trump also seems to depress Republican turnout and has helped build the DSA and local Democratic organizations into forces to be reckoned with - I wouldn’t give that up. Running against him in 2018 and 2020 is going to be too much fun.
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 26 November 2017 02:01 (seven years ago)
Pence taking over in the last two years would still be, in effect and in nature, a Trump admin - he wouldnt really be able to run away from his complicity. Also he wouldnt have a solid base of support in 2020, and GOP infighting and jockeying (and ineffectiveness) would increase heading into the next election.
― Οὖτις, Sunday, 26 November 2017 02:01 (seven years ago)
I'm not saying there isn't a strong white nationalist militia movement in this country. There is. But I'd point out that they haven't been visibly present, except at feeble gatherings, since the election.
Look, I didn't think Obama would make it one term. I thought for sure some white nationalist creep was surely going to put a bullet in him.
But now I think this Trump's Army thing is certainly overstated.
― fajita seas, Sunday, 26 November 2017 02:48 (seven years ago)
dunno if this toobin article was posted here but it's in much the same vein as that frank rich's post trump trumpism new york mag piece
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/11/13/is-tom-cotton-the-future-of-trumpism
Roby Brock, who hosts the leading public-affairs television program in Arkansas, told me, “From the beginning, Tom could play to both the establishment and the Tea Party. Everyone recognizes he’s got a firm set of conservative principles, but that makes him a polarizing figure. There are a lot of people here, too, who hate him and think he’s the Antichrist. The only thing everyone agrees on is that he wants to be President someday.” To make that next leap, Cotton expresses the militarism, bellicosity, intolerance, and xenophobia of Donald Trump, but without the childish tweets. For those who see Trump’s Presidency as an aberration, or as a singular phenomenon, Cotton offers a useful corrective. He and his supporters see Trump and Trumpism as the future of the Republican Party.---Recently, at his Little Rock office, Cotton presented several medals to the family of George Anderson, a Second World War veteran who had died in 2006. Cotton began with a solemn introduction, but then, unexpectedly, Anderson’s family members, most of whom were elderly, took over the proceedings and began telling stories about George, who had made his living running car washes and coin-operated laundries. Cotton’s staff members and the assembled local reporters began chuckling at the rambling accounts of how George stacked his coins. A more deft politician might have joined in the fun, but Cotton just stood there, seemingly paralyzed by the deviations from good order. The ceremony came to a close when George Anderson’s surviving sister turned to Cotton and said, “As for you—you keep standing up for our President.”
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Sunday, 26 November 2017 03:42 (seven years ago)
I’m totally OK with the future of the GOP belonging to WW2 veterans and their siblings
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 26 November 2017 04:01 (seven years ago)
Recently, at his Little Rock office, Cotton presented several medals to the family of George Anderson, a Second World War veteran who had died in 2006. Cotton began with a solemn introduction, but then, unexpectedly, Anderson’s family members, most of whom were elderly, took over the proceedings and began telling stories about George, who had made his living running car washes and coin-operated laundries. Cotton’s staff members and the assembled local reporters began chuckling at the rambling accounts of how George stacked his coins. A more deft politician might have joined in the fun, but Cotton just stood there, seemingly paralyzed by the deviations from good order. The ceremony came to a close when George Anderson’s surviving sister turned to Cotton and said, “As for you—you keep standing up for our President.”
it's arrested development
― Karl Malone, Sunday, 26 November 2017 05:47 (seven years ago)
Note that @SenatorLeahy's suggestions don't include "stop dropping bombs on people." https://t.co/fp1dNoyNRG— Nima Shirazi (@WideAsleepNima) November 24, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 26 November 2017 14:19 (seven years ago)
bombing people creates jobs
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Sunday, 26 November 2017 14:56 (seven years ago)
JOBS
INFRASTRUCTURE WEEK
― Never Learn To Mike Love (C. Grisso/McCain), Sunday, 26 November 2017 15:05 (seven years ago)
ugh that Tom Cotton piece. What a shit. Conservatives think they recognize someone with brains because he reads...Robert Bork?
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 26 November 2017 15:06 (seven years ago)
Spymaster (ret) Hayden going ham today
If this is who we are or who we are becoming, I have wasted 40 years of my life. Until now it was not possible for me to conceive of an American President capable of such an outrageous assault on truth, a free press or the first amendment.— Gen Michael Hayden (@GenMhayden) November 26, 2017
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 26 November 2017 16:39 (seven years ago)
Steve Coll:
Trump occupies the White House in an era of heightened Presidential powers. He may be constrained by his unpopularity outside the Republican Party, as well as by the professionalism of the F.B.I., the judiciary, and the press. But, as Archibald Cox observed just before he was fired, “Eventually, a President can always work his will.” In all probability, the country’s most dangerous trials during the Trump Administration lie ahead.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 26 November 2017 16:51 (seven years ago)
i could conceive of one, General
maybe cuz Nixon was president when i was eight
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 26 November 2017 16:54 (seven years ago)
Conyers quits leadership post
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 26 November 2017 17:55 (seven years ago)
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-annoyed-ivanka-over-her-213413193.html
― fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Sunday, 26 November 2017 18:52 (seven years ago)
I endorsed Luther Strange in the Alabama Primary. He shot way up in the polls but it wasn’t enough. Can’t let Schumer/Pelosi win this race. Liberal Jones would be BAD!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 26, 2017
a stirring and nuanced examination of the roy moore race. "Liberal Jones" not really up to his usual nickname standards though.
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 26 November 2017 20:10 (seven years ago)
when i was home on thanksgiving break i listened to a christian radio station that seamlessly morphed into a conservative politics show. in that show, the host made the case that although moore's actions were potentially regrettable - but not proven, let's keep that in mind, only alleged at this point - it would be an absolute catastrophe for a democrat to win the seat. bad for the tax bill, bad for obamacare repeal, bad for abortion, you name it.
so far, pretty standard arguments for a trump supporter. but then it was funny because a key part of his argument was that whoever wins - moore or jones - they'll only be holding the seat until the 2018 elections anyway. so, he said, even if you had "moral objections" to moore - and remember, alleged! nothing proven! i thought this country still believed in innocent until proven guilty, alleged! - he was only going to hold the seat for a little less than a year, anyway, and then the 2018 election would give alabama voters a chance to start with a clean slate. so why not vote for moore so that he can be present in the senate for these key votes in the next few months?
of course, that's wrong. the special election is to seat someone through to the 2020 election, not the 2018 election. but whatever, he went on like that for an entire segment. i kept listening to the rest of the show to see if anyone would correct him but it didn't happen. the weirdest part was the transition from a sermon (by Charles Swindoll, from a 16-part series on Paul, apparently) to this political show, which imbued the show with a sense of religious guidance and sponsorship, even though they barely mentioned anything spiritual. instead, it was just talking points in the form of misleading fragments of facts and outright lies, spoonfed to the listener in repetitive steady doses. if you ever wonder how evangelicals end up being the biggest supporters of someone like Moore, at least part of the answer is in the absolute garbage they apparently listen to
― Karl Malone, Sunday, 26 November 2017 20:40 (seven years ago)
i got a lib-er-al jonnnnneshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlhWPVJNAOo
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Sunday, 26 November 2017 20:59 (seven years ago)
if you ever wonder how evangelicals end up being the biggest supporters of someone like Moore, at least part of the answer is in the absolute garbage they apparently listen toThat and being stupid. the collective cognitive albedo of the southern evangelical / prosperity gospel hive mind exceeds matte black and edges into stealth bomber territory. No reflection is possible without specialized, highly calibrated instruments.
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 26 November 2017 21:39 (seven years ago)
I've read numerous interviews with seemingly reasonable people who vote exclusively for anti-abortion candidates, even when those candidates are otherwise terrible people. With such a low bar, calling him Liberal Jones is probably effective enough.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 26 November 2017 22:36 (seven years ago)
/ if you ever wonder how evangelicals end up being the biggest supporters of someone like Moore, at least part of the answer is in the absolute garbage they apparently listen to/That and being stupid. the collective cognitive albedo of the southern evangelical / prosperity gospel hive mind exceeds matte black and edges into stealth bomber territory. No reflection is possible without specialized, highly calibrated instruments.
― droit au butt (Euler), Sunday, 26 November 2017 22:40 (seven years ago)
I’m confused. I admit I was being obtuse with my phrasing but what did you think I meant?
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 26 November 2017 22:50 (seven years ago)
i just keep hearing it to the tune of:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDRaKC53DGA
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Sunday, 26 November 2017 22:52 (seven years ago)
1/ The NYTimes is densely defending their article by claiming it was intended to shed light on the normalcy of racism in American society. I agree this is a worthy topic of discussion. So, let’s talk about all the things the Times could have *actually* achieved this. . . . pic.twitter.com/9ZsHMxsz8p— Mangy Jay (@magi_jay) November 26, 2017
^^ thread
Dunno if this shit NYT piece was covered or not. But boy, was it a shit piece.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 26 November 2017 23:22 (seven years ago)
That worthless, reprehensible article is just begging for it.
"Nazis: they're just like us!"
"Yeah, I know they have an abhorrent racist ideology, but what are they like ... as people?"
"He might be a Nazi, but he mows the lawn like anybody else. And that lawn is impeccable."
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 26 November 2017 23:40 (seven years ago)
Otm. Might me my twitter bubble, but NYT deserves all the scorn and tbf to be hanged for this next level type of normalisation imo.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 26 November 2017 23:57 (seven years ago)
'Nazi's wipe their asses, too. Who knew all that time that nazi's... are just like you and me.'
― Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 26 November 2017 23:58 (seven years ago)
Libs will always give a pass to the NYT. I doubt they lost any subscriptions/money/clicks over this piece, which was basically trolling their readership.
― Οὖτις, Monday, 27 November 2017 00:19 (seven years ago)
I actually thought about that and then figured we didn't delve into it here because discussing the useless mendacity of the NYT in covering basically anything at this point is kind of deserving of its own thread, like the ILE edition of the track-by-track Billy Joel thread, except way harder on the participants
― El Tomboto, Monday, 27 November 2017 00:20 (seven years ago)
have you heard "Storm Front"
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 November 2017 00:21 (seven years ago)
oh hey xpost! Fuck you, we unsubscribed from the NYT in 2009. Who's getting a pass from who?
― El Tomboto, Monday, 27 November 2017 00:21 (seven years ago)
writer in the nytnormalizing nazis
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Monday, 27 November 2017 00:27 (seven years ago)
Are those Paul Simon lyrics?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 November 2017 00:33 (seven years ago)
Tombot, it would probably be more like the equivalent of the 'Is the Guardian worse than it used to be' thread?
Idk over 'ere NYT is still revered and looked at/up to by all the "srs press". Not saying that changed all of a sudden, but boy was this a terrible normalising piece.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 27 November 2017 00:36 (seven years ago)
people get really worked up about one article huh
― k3vin k., Monday, 27 November 2017 00:57 (seven years ago)
that was my other thing, this one about the Hovaters is kind of a drop in the bucket given how fucking horrid that birdcage liner has been since feels like forever, as this quartz piece cheekily suggests in the opening paragraph: https://qz.com/1138080/the-problem-with-the-new-york-times-normalizing-profile-of-nazi-sympathizer-tony-hovater/
when you're getting pwned on the regular by vox and atlantic media staff bloggers, maybe it's time to wonder if maybe jumping on the "color photography" bandwagon in 1997 was the right move!
― El Tomboto, Monday, 27 November 2017 01:02 (seven years ago)
well they did link to the online store page where you could buy the guy's swastika armband.
but there's also the thrush (RIP for sex pesting) & haberman stenography, this week's new freidman column about how saudi arabia is good, the fact they got rid of the public editor, this thing which doesn't mention that the subject of the article is a known fraud who works with cambridge analytica, etc. also iraq. when the stakes are high it's mostly an extremely bad newspaper.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 27 November 2017 01:07 (seven years ago)
this is really the quiddity of the NYT:
The NYT's constant stream of lowkey sympathetic portraits of racists and sexists is what happens when you believe, institutionally, that your real audience already possesses all the correct beliefs— Erin Kissane (@kissane) November 26, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 27 November 2017 01:08 (seven years ago)
Eh. The editorial page is a cloaca like most newspapers. Dunno what you expect! I still read the news with pleasure every day, always with caution.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 November 2017 01:18 (seven years ago)
I don't think they believe their beliefs are correct. I think they think liberalism is wrong, and the ludicrous puffery about the ruling class that we have a thread dedicated to is of a piece with the fawning profiles of angry scum from flyover exurbs. The entire editorial posture is self-flagellation and kowtowing to the truly right and powerful, mostly scions of resource-extraction economies and those they patronize.
― El Tomboto, Monday, 27 November 2017 01:33 (seven years ago)
i was not impressed with that Hovater profile, but he still came across as a hateful moron, no?
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Monday, 27 November 2017 01:36 (seven years ago)
There might have been too much emphasis on how “normal” and “polite” he seemed, I guess, but they say that about serial killers too.
― treeship 2, Monday, 27 November 2017 01:52 (seven years ago)
I don’t think anyone became a racist after reading that.
― treeship 2, Monday, 27 November 2017 01:53 (seven years ago)
This is not the first time they've done this.
― Simon H., Monday, 27 November 2017 01:55 (seven years ago)
Or became softer on racism. Who knows, but the idea of “normalization” might need unpacking. Trump was never normalized — the Times treated him as a freak the whole election — and he still won.
― treeship 2, Monday, 27 November 2017 01:56 (seven years ago)
i mean the fact is that the NYT produces the world's best reporting and also a bunch of shitty stuff. it sucks but boycotting the paper is probably not the best strategy
― k3vin k., Monday, 27 November 2017 02:02 (seven years ago)
People are boycotting it over this????
― treeship 2, Monday, 27 November 2017 02:04 (seven years ago)
the Times treated him as a freak the whole election
And yet they treated many of his most outrageous lies and obfuscations as worthy of serious consideration
― Οὖτις, Monday, 27 November 2017 02:05 (seven years ago)
I am not boycotting the Times over this fyi, i gave up on them after judith miller
― Οὖτις, Monday, 27 November 2017 02:06 (seven years ago)
There have been scores of reasons to give up on them over the last few years tbh, anyone here who is surprised hasn't been paying attention
― Simon H., Monday, 27 November 2017 02:10 (seven years ago)
otoh their Magazine a week ago ran an outstanding expose of how our goddamn Military Death Machine in Iraq lies about killing civilians, maybe read that for balance.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Monday, 27 November 2017 02:16 (seven years ago)
yes that was good
― Simon H., Monday, 27 November 2017 02:21 (seven years ago)
The anecdote I bring up a lot is Errol Morris' "Mr. Death." The first cut of the film had no editorializing, no experts to refute his Holocaust denial. Morris figured, hey, give 'em enough rope. But infamously. when Morris screened the film at Harvard there were enough people at least giving credence to his crazy beliefs that he reconsidered and recut with experts making clear that his subject's beliefs were not just offensive but wrong.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 November 2017 02:22 (seven years ago)
same thing when he showed The Unknown Known; he said people kept telling him he was humanizing Rumsfeld when it was clear to me he straight up loathed the motherfucker but he seems to have given up pleasing the crowd
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Monday, 27 November 2017 02:39 (seven years ago)
Something a friend of mine posted (publicly) on Facebook:
Donald Trump’s election to the presidency was the culmination of a six-year period during which he launched himself in politics by promoting a baseless, openly racist conspiracy theory challenging Barack Obama’s citizenship. Since Trump won the election, and even before it, pundits and reporters have struggled to find ways to insist that, because so many people could select him as their president, he must be more complicated than he appears. He isn’t. He is, as Steve Bannon has said admiringly, Archie Bunker. He’s a man who could, without shame or hesitation, promote a racist conspiracy theory, and who has never apologized for it, though towards the end of his campaign, he did claim that it was actually Hillary Clinton who had started it and that he had “finished it” by bullying Obama into finding and releasing his birth certificate, which Trump has also said is a fake. He may be other (bad) things, but he’s never any better than the man who did that.No outlet had worked harder than the New York Times to publish articles explaining that there are a great many good, decent people who voted for Trump. This is a lie, but you can see why they do it. Trump’s whole existence testifies to the fact that telling lies is fun. And there are deeper reasons for it: nobody wants to seem close-minded or judgmental towards those who are culturally different from you or with whom you have political differences.One constant of the pieces analyzing Trump’s appeal that appeared immediately after the election is that there are reasons besides racism for voting for Donald Trump. And while it’s true that all the people who voted for Trump aren’t personally repulsed by racism—a group that, so far as I know, consists entirely of racists—there ARE reasons besides racism for voting for Donald Trump. There’s xenophobia. There’s misogyny. There’s homophobia. There’s a belief that a TV character is smarter than all the politicians put together. There’s a belief that consumer protections and environmental regulations are breaking the backs of the little guy. There’s the conviction that basic civility and any degree of intelligence are stifling our society and we need a bigoted, stupid daddy figure to yell abuse at women and nonwhite people all the time. There’s the inexplicable belief that there’s some truth to as much as two percent of the things said on Fox News by people not named Shepard Smith.There’s the assumption that Donald Trump, an heir to wealth, a marketable name, and valuable contacts who has made such a mess of his business affairs that he had to peddle his ass to Russian oligarchs because American banks would no longer have anything to do with him is some kind of tactical genius. Theres the thought that democracy has gotten out of hand and we need to be more like Russia under someone like Putin, a tough guy who seems to keep his country pretty white and keeps his bitches and queers in their place. There’s the belief that Trump is an acceptable candidate compared to Hillary Clinton on the theory that Hillary Clinton is Satan, or a concern for the protection of fetuses so all-consuming that you are willing to forfeit any protections for the lives and rights of those who have already been born. There are a great many reasons to vote for Donald Trump; there just isn’t a single defensible reason for voting for Donald Trump, one that doesn’t mark the voter as an objectivity terrible person and unpatriotic American. And these aren’t judgements about people’s politics but Morality 101. Donald Trump has the distinction of being probably the only person ever elected president of the United States solely based on the support of garbage people.The New York Times’s profile of a Trump supporter and self-defined Nazi has gotten a lot of criticism for “normalizing” Nazism, because the reporter respectfully details the trivial details of the subject’s life and dishes it all together with things like his belief that Jews control the media and his wife’s sympathy for George Zimmerman. But all the pieces that have appeared profiling Trump supporters do this. Even though every single person who voted for Donald Trump is a piece of dirt, reporters have insisted on their decency and urged readers to consider their “legitimate concerns”—Black Lives Matter is a terrorist organization, or Obama was trying to create a landscape of desolation and poverty because he was homesick for Kenya, stuff like that.If the Heartland Nazi piece existed in a vacuum, it would be fine, but in the context that the Times and other papers have created, it makes sense that readers would assume the point of it was to make them relate to the Nazi. Are we really supposed to pretend that there are any people who voted for Trump who are on even a slightly higher moral plane than his Nazi supporters? Whatever they think is in their hearts, they all knowingly voted for white supremacy as an electoral choice and a map for America’s future. I’ve been listening to those malignant fuckheads for some time now, and I know how they sound: they don’t want to discriminate against anybody, they don’t hate anyone, they don’t want to hurt anyone, they just want things to feel NORMAL again, the way they did when nobody thought a black man or a woman could get anywhere near the presidential podium.(And I can tell you that while they might not hate anyone, they can get pretty testy with a white guy who disagrees with them, and that when pushed to the limit they will say things like “What about all the time you’ve said ‘nigger’?” or “Oh, like you’ve never tried to do something with a woman when she was too drunk to know where she was.” One thing I’ve learned pretty recently, now that Trump has made garbage people feel sufficiently empowered to let their freak flags fly, is that garbage people literally believe there are no good people or even any people trying to be good, just garbage people happily wallowing in their own shit like them, and hypocrites who don’t want to own up to what they are. And woe to the white Southerner who can think of any reason to be proud of his “heritage” that doesn’t require the veneration of pro-slavery traitorous pieces of shit who murdered actual loyal Americans, my fellow countrymen, in a “civil” war. But I digress.)I sometimes see things written by white Southerners who aren’t racist themselves, lord knows, but maybe they had some family who were at the riot that accompanied the integration of Ole Miss or on the jury that turned Byron de la Beckwith loose, and who seem to be demanding absolution for the people they feel connected to who somehow hadn’t received word, a hundred years after the Emancipation Proclamation, that racism is evil and stupid. And I grew up in Mississippi and went to a segregated school that my sometime-Klansman daddy found me to go to and I know from my own experience that we all know that racism is evil and stupid, it’s pretty goddamn obvious, you’d need to have a heart of coal and a head like a compost pit to not figure that out, and some people decide to run with it anyway, because they choose to be garbage. The Times’s profiles of Trump supporters seem to be written from a viewpoint that it’s possible to not know—not if you’re a coastal elitist, of course, but white working class Southerners like me are born stupid and just get dumber as they go along, so you can’t judge them, mustn’t shame them or shun them if they vote the nation into crisis, because the poor rubes can’t possibly know better, and are only to be pitied.Between the original heartland-Nazi profile and the piece linked to here, the Times ran an acknowledgment of sorts that the profile is unsatisfying, because the reporter failed to get the “Rosebud” moment that would explain why a man would turn Nazi. Has to be one, right? I could never get a job profiling a Nazi, or big-fucking-difference a Trump supporter, or even my father or any of the other racists I’ve known who had some charm and were also fundamentally worthless, because after thinking long and hard about a whole bunch of individual cases that have come my way, I really do think that people come to embrace garbage thinking not because of legitimate concerns or some lightning bolt of the mind but just because they’ve made a conscious decision to be garbage people.
No outlet had worked harder than the New York Times to publish articles explaining that there are a great many good, decent people who voted for Trump. This is a lie, but you can see why they do it. Trump’s whole existence testifies to the fact that telling lies is fun. And there are deeper reasons for it: nobody wants to seem close-minded or judgmental towards those who are culturally different from you or with whom you have political differences.
One constant of the pieces analyzing Trump’s appeal that appeared immediately after the election is that there are reasons besides racism for voting for Donald Trump. And while it’s true that all the people who voted for Trump aren’t personally repulsed by racism—a group that, so far as I know, consists entirely of racists—there ARE reasons besides racism for voting for Donald Trump. There’s xenophobia. There’s misogyny. There’s homophobia. There’s a belief that a TV character is smarter than all the politicians put together. There’s a belief that consumer protections and environmental regulations are breaking the backs of the little guy. There’s the conviction that basic civility and any degree of intelligence are stifling our society and we need a bigoted, stupid daddy figure to yell abuse at women and nonwhite people all the time. There’s the inexplicable belief that there’s some truth to as much as two percent of the things said on Fox News by people not named Shepard Smith.
There’s the assumption that Donald Trump, an heir to wealth, a marketable name, and valuable contacts who has made such a mess of his business affairs that he had to peddle his ass to Russian oligarchs because American banks would no longer have anything to do with him is some kind of tactical genius. Theres the thought that democracy has gotten out of hand and we need to be more like Russia under someone like Putin, a tough guy who seems to keep his country pretty white and keeps his bitches and queers in their place. There’s the belief that Trump is an acceptable candidate compared to Hillary Clinton on the theory that Hillary Clinton is Satan, or a concern for the protection of fetuses so all-consuming that you are willing to forfeit any protections for the lives and rights of those who have already been born. There are a great many reasons to vote for Donald Trump; there just isn’t a single defensible reason for voting for Donald Trump, one that doesn’t mark the voter as an objectivity terrible person and unpatriotic American. And these aren’t judgements about people’s politics but Morality 101. Donald Trump has the distinction of being probably the only person ever elected president of the United States solely based on the support of garbage people.
The New York Times’s profile of a Trump supporter and self-defined Nazi has gotten a lot of criticism for “normalizing” Nazism, because the reporter respectfully details the trivial details of the subject’s life and dishes it all together with things like his belief that Jews control the media and his wife’s sympathy for George Zimmerman. But all the pieces that have appeared profiling Trump supporters do this. Even though every single person who voted for Donald Trump is a piece of dirt, reporters have insisted on their decency and urged readers to consider their “legitimate concerns”—Black Lives Matter is a terrorist organization, or Obama was trying to create a landscape of desolation and poverty because he was homesick for Kenya, stuff like that.
If the Heartland Nazi piece existed in a vacuum, it would be fine, but in the context that the Times and other papers have created, it makes sense that readers would assume the point of it was to make them relate to the Nazi. Are we really supposed to pretend that there are any people who voted for Trump who are on even a slightly higher moral plane than his Nazi supporters? Whatever they think is in their hearts, they all knowingly voted for white supremacy as an electoral choice and a map for America’s future. I’ve been listening to those malignant fuckheads for some time now, and I know how they sound: they don’t want to discriminate against anybody, they don’t hate anyone, they don’t want to hurt anyone, they just want things to feel NORMAL again, the way they did when nobody thought a black man or a woman could get anywhere near the presidential podium.
(And I can tell you that while they might not hate anyone, they can get pretty testy with a white guy who disagrees with them, and that when pushed to the limit they will say things like “What about all the time you’ve said ‘nigger’?” or “Oh, like you’ve never tried to do something with a woman when she was too drunk to know where she was.” One thing I’ve learned pretty recently, now that Trump has made garbage people feel sufficiently empowered to let their freak flags fly, is that garbage people literally believe there are no good people or even any people trying to be good, just garbage people happily wallowing in their own shit like them, and hypocrites who don’t want to own up to what they are. And woe to the white Southerner who can think of any reason to be proud of his “heritage” that doesn’t require the veneration of pro-slavery traitorous pieces of shit who murdered actual loyal Americans, my fellow countrymen, in a “civil” war. But I digress.)
I sometimes see things written by white Southerners who aren’t racist themselves, lord knows, but maybe they had some family who were at the riot that accompanied the integration of Ole Miss or on the jury that turned Byron de la Beckwith loose, and who seem to be demanding absolution for the people they feel connected to who somehow hadn’t received word, a hundred years after the Emancipation Proclamation, that racism is evil and stupid. And I grew up in Mississippi and went to a segregated school that my sometime-Klansman daddy found me to go to and I know from my own experience that we all know that racism is evil and stupid, it’s pretty goddamn obvious, you’d need to have a heart of coal and a head like a compost pit to not figure that out, and some people decide to run with it anyway, because they choose to be garbage. The Times’s profiles of Trump supporters seem to be written from a viewpoint that it’s possible to not know—not if you’re a coastal elitist, of course, but white working class Southerners like me are born stupid and just get dumber as they go along, so you can’t judge them, mustn’t shame them or shun them if they vote the nation into crisis, because the poor rubes can’t possibly know better, and are only to be pitied.
Between the original heartland-Nazi profile and the piece linked to here, the Times ran an acknowledgment of sorts that the profile is unsatisfying, because the reporter failed to get the “Rosebud” moment that would explain why a man would turn Nazi. Has to be one, right? I could never get a job profiling a Nazi, or big-fucking-difference a Trump supporter, or even my father or any of the other racists I’ve known who had some charm and were also fundamentally worthless, because after thinking long and hard about a whole bunch of individual cases that have come my way, I really do think that people come to embrace garbage thinking not because of legitimate concerns or some lightning bolt of the mind but just because they’ve made a conscious decision to be garbage people.
The link mentioned was of course to the Times' editorial response to its pissed-off readers.
― grawlix (unperson), Monday, 27 November 2017 02:59 (seven years ago)
explaining that there are a great many good, decent people who voted for Trump. This is a lie
― crüt, Monday, 27 November 2017 03:07 (seven years ago)
a fan!
In my view, the attacks on this story are positively nuts. Soft on Nazis? It is a superbly reported, superbly rendered story of a homegrown Nazi — the Nazi next door — absolutely chilling in its impact. You don’t always get convenient horns and tails! https://t.co/WxOrYAhJaY— Jay Nordlinger (@jaynordlinger) November 27, 2017
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 November 2017 03:24 (seven years ago)
8% of black voters and 29% of hispanic voters went for Trump. I don’t think these people were all morallt equivalent to Nazis, whatever else you might say about them.
― treeship 2, Monday, 27 November 2017 03:27 (seven years ago)
Xp the part of unperson’s post that crut quoted
Trump is a horrifying excuse for a human being whose canpaign was indeed explicitly racists but his voters represent this huge bloc of people who had all kinds of different reasons for voting as they did.
― treeship 2, Monday, 27 November 2017 03:30 (seven years ago)
Sorry for the typos
garbage typing
― j., Monday, 27 November 2017 03:32 (seven years ago)
Personally I found the Friedman column and the Shapiro profile more offensive, not that this article was worth publishing.
― JoeStork, Monday, 27 November 2017 03:36 (seven years ago)
I remain convinced that the only excuse for voting Trump is stupidity or assholism.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 November 2017 03:38 (seven years ago)
Why? Because they're not white? It is possible to be both a nonwhite person and a garbage person, you know.
― grawlix (unperson), Monday, 27 November 2017 03:38 (seven years ago)
And if you are advancing Nazis' political agenda, whether or not you are yourself a Nazi is immaterial. You are helping Nazis. And voting for Trump helped Nazis.
― grawlix (unperson), Monday, 27 November 2017 03:40 (seven years ago)
Sure, but I don’t think they were voting for Trump because they were drawn to his racism, or even because they excused his racism. Most likely they didn’t find him racist against their groups. So that means there were Trump voters whose votes did not express tacit approval for racism. They expressed something else.
― treeship 2, Monday, 27 November 2017 03:44 (seven years ago)
The first and second sentences contradict themselves, and thus cancel out the third and fourth sentences. Many black people hold racist views about Latinos, and vice versa.
― grawlix (unperson), Monday, 27 November 2017 03:49 (seven years ago)
Which means you can’t infer someone’s motives or character based on their vote. They might be a “good, decent person” who did a bad thing. It’s destructive to write off so many people as morally reprehensible “garbage” people.
― treeship 2, Monday, 27 November 2017 03:49 (seven years ago)
Self xp
― treeship 2, Monday, 27 November 2017 03:50 (seven years ago)
psssst racism was not the only reason people voted for trump (a big'un though)
― Simon H., Monday, 27 November 2017 03:52 (seven years ago)
That’s what I’m sayin
― treeship 2, Monday, 27 November 2017 03:54 (seven years ago)
Treeship, are you a New York Times reporter? If not, why are you so desperate to justify the hateful, nihilistic voting booth rage-spasms of, yes, garbage people?
― grawlix (unperson), Monday, 27 November 2017 03:58 (seven years ago)
glad to know i wasn’t the only one pissed about that nazi article. finally canceled my NYT subscription.
― the late great, Monday, 27 November 2017 04:05 (seven years ago)
You need to come to grips with the idea that this country has a lot of very bad, stupid people in it. Irredeemable people, in fact. Sure, they’ll smile at you and shake your hand. But their political beliefs are poisonous, and unshakable. So fuck ‘em; they’re no good to you.
― grawlix (unperson), Monday, 27 November 2017 04:05 (seven years ago)
Racism/assholism or stupidity. Though I must admit a certain sympathy for Trump folks profiled in the New Yorker a few weeks back who were anti universal health care even though they would benefit and will be harmed by its absence, simply because they have some hard-held almost anachronistic ethical standard that no one should get something for nothing, especially when others are working hard and getting less for their effort. It's a similar strain of thought that runs through some of what passes for Trump-fans half-assed xenophobia. It's less that people hate foreigners and more resentment that someone might sneak into the country or arrive as a refugee and immediately be given benefits or resources that others have struggled to achieve for years. Not unlike, come to think of it, similar anti-union sentiment. "We fought for our benefits, why should someone who just got a job here get the same benefits we struggled for for decades?!" I don't know if these people are necessarily racist, but their sure views enable racists and their goals often intersect with racists, so not unlike Trump supports who claim not to be racists, if you're supporting a racist in service of goals shared by racists even though you yourself do not think of yourself as racist, or even other races or ethnicities as bad people or inferior to you, well, surprise ...
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 November 2017 04:06 (seven years ago)
I talked about it with a friend after the election. His wife is Chinese, his daughter and son half Chinese. His dad was a Trump voter. The choice I think he gave his dad was, if you're not a racist, then fight back against all the racism of Trump and his racist followers. As we see, not many Trump supporters have been willing to do that. But then, Trump barely managed a victory (with mitigating factors), and as depressing as it is to consider, some immutable percentage of Americans are, yeah, garbage people, and he won with the swing support of perhaps slightly less-garbage people who perhaps inadvertently or maybe even unknowingly sided with garbage people. In fact, the only Trump supporter I personally know, who is old and a little dumb but not necessarily a bad person, as far as I have ever been able to tell, has full on buyer's remorse, even switching from Fox to MSNBC (!), but my feeling, as a different sort of garbage person, remains: fuck her.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 November 2017 04:12 (seven years ago)
The Nazi sympathiser piece is no masterpiece of journalism but I think it makes it pretty obvious that the guy is morally objectionable in every way. It's entitled Voice of Hate, and within the first few sentences it says he's a bigot and that most Americans would be disgusted by his views. It quotes him as saying Hitler was a warm and caring guy, I mean does that really need commentary? No, the reporter doesn't challenge the guy, but it's not that kind of piece. It's more of a 'this is what today's Nazi looks like' piece. And it also counterpoints that supposedly "normal" exterior with the bile that the guy posts online.
― Zelda Zonk, Monday, 27 November 2017 04:36 (seven years ago)
'this is what today's Nazi looks like'
Counterpoint: who gives a fuck?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 November 2017 04:46 (seven years ago)
Well sure, there's that!
On the other hand, if Nazis these days are looking more culturally mainstream than they used to be, maybe it's worth pointing out. Or maybe not. I wasn't saying the piece was genius, only that I didn't find it pandering
― Zelda Zonk, Monday, 27 November 2017 04:58 (seven years ago)
I agree. I don't know, I don't find it 'normalizing' per se.
I thought the atlantic piece on the Daily Stormer thing was more interesting though as far as 'peering into the heart of darkness' stories go.
― akm, Monday, 27 November 2017 05:17 (seven years ago)
unperson’s friend OTMbtw it is extraordinarily naive to think that blacks and Latinos can’t be racist against their own census categories.
― El Tomboto, Monday, 27 November 2017 05:49 (seven years ago)
I mean, there are clearly 8% and 29% who absolutely are, respectively
― El Tomboto, Monday, 27 November 2017 05:50 (seven years ago)
The form is very familiar to me from the Balkans. It was rampant during the 1990s: Karadzic gave interviews to Western media every other day, there’s hours of footage. In the meantime, he was murdering thousands. But hey, dead Bosnians are so “other” and his English was great.— Jasmin Mujanović (@JasminMuj) November 26, 2017
short 'thread'
― j., Monday, 27 November 2017 07:19 (seven years ago)
re the nazi thang
How many times can America reach "rock bottom"? Apparently as often as it can lose its innocence. https://t.co/v5z9u4xUvb— corey robin (@CoreyRobin) November 27, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Monday, 27 November 2017 08:54 (seven years ago)
Old news, but I'm not sure Tom Cotton's peerless wingnut credentials will mean he'll get the Trump voters, who got a demographic-busting amount of people interested (to the point of voting) partly because he's famous.
― Andrew Farrell, Monday, 27 November 2017 09:10 (seven years ago)
― El Tomboto, Sunday, November 26, 2017 11:50 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
identifying things that are black with being unreflective/stupid.
so many comments on evangelicals ignore black evangelicals. I don't think you were going for the racism that I saw initially but it hit a point to which I'm attuned
― droit au butt (Euler), Monday, 27 November 2017 11:54 (seven years ago)
'this is what today's Nazi looks like'Counterpoint: who gives a fuck?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 November 2017 04:46 (eight hours ago) Permalink
i do. it seems like an obvious thing to report on in 2017. nazis have roared back into pubic awareness; people are curious about who they are.
― treeship 2, Monday, 27 November 2017 12:59 (seven years ago)
I'd be ok with a list of names. Not sure I need anything more.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 November 2017 13:06 (seven years ago)
it's the ladies' home journal tone that cooked their goose here imo
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 27 November 2017 13:07 (seven years ago)
idk. i liked "eichmann in jerusalem." i thought it was instructive to see that a person can appear normal in some spheres of his life but, given the right conditions and incentives, be an absolute monster.
― treeship 2, Monday, 27 November 2017 13:08 (seven years ago)
i don't need to think of nazis as cartoon villains in order to know that they're bad. the thing that's bad about them is their belief system, which isn't always on display as they navigate society.
― treeship 2, Monday, 27 November 2017 13:10 (seven years ago)
Don't we know about 'the banality of evil' by now though? How many stories about lawn mowing, grocery shopping, calling their mum once a week nazi's do we need?
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 27 November 2017 13:11 (seven years ago)
it's the tone.
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 27 November 2017 13:14 (seven years ago)
Eichmann in Jerusalem is a fairly different thing from that shitty NYT article.
― Frederik B, Monday, 27 November 2017 13:14 (seven years ago)
xp Absolutely.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 27 November 2017 13:15 (seven years ago)
I like The Man Without Qualities. Doesn't mean I want a gushing article about any Franz Joseph Fan Club.
― Frederik B, Monday, 27 November 2017 13:15 (seven years ago)
The banality of the banality of evil
that said, i am one of those who DO need to see the Nazis as cartoon villains in order to know they're bad. because i am simple-minded and dim.
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 27 November 2017 13:16 (seven years ago)
i thought it was instructive to see that a person can appear normal in some spheres of his life but, given the right conditions and incentives, be an absolute monster.
Did you read it when you were eight? Or was there some reason that this was something you needed to be "instructed" about as an adult?
― grawlix (unperson), Monday, 27 November 2017 13:16 (seven years ago)
Exactly. And there's also a difference I think between retroactively determining how almost an entire country became complicit in a historic mass racist genocide vs. profiling some shithead outlier in America. I mean, there are plenty of racists in America, who cares about the handful that are stupid and misguided enough to actually identify as Nazis? I don't give a shit about them. I care more (but still not much) about people who don't identify as Nazis and claim not to be racist but still enable those strains of belief. The failing of this piece is not focusing on the factor that make this dude different: that is, his explicit declared allegiance to an irrational ideology of hate. If you're not gong to dive into why he's one of the few to actually identify as a Nazi and Nazi beliefs, then why bother?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 November 2017 13:16 (seven years ago)
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 November 2017 13:17 (seven years ago)
Not ~ entirely ~ convinced Treeship 2 isn't actually Treeship tbh
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 27 November 2017 13:17 (seven years ago)
t2 not as loosey goosey imo
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 27 November 2017 13:18 (seven years ago)
Treeship of Theseus, imo
― Frederik B, Monday, 27 November 2017 13:21 (seven years ago)
Treeship of Fools
― here come the warm jorts (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 27 November 2017 13:25 (seven years ago)
― Frederik B, Monday, November 27, 2017 8:21 AM (seven minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
this is pretty good
― treeship 2, Monday, 27 November 2017 13:28 (seven years ago)
people get killed inthe result of treeshipbuilding
― Simon H., Monday, 27 November 2017 13:29 (seven years ago)
second coming of treeshus sheist
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Monday, 27 November 2017 13:37 (seven years ago)
Since the first day I took office, all you hear is the phony Democrat excuse for losing the election, Russia, Russia,Russia. Despite this I have the economy booming and have possibly done more than any 10 month President. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 26, 2017
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Monday, 27 November 2017 13:42 (seven years ago)
well it's about time they started smearing mueller
http://www.newsweek.com/robert-mueller-special-counsel-russia-aides-criticize-722670
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 27 November 2017 13:45 (seven years ago)
he is the jan brady of presidents (xpost)
― akm, Monday, 27 November 2017 13:49 (seven years ago)
There you have it, he's a 10-month president. No need for all those other months.
― voodoo chili, Monday, 27 November 2017 14:08 (seven years ago)
Time for him to pack his bags
"possibly done more"
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 November 2017 14:10 (seven years ago)
Well I’d be surprised if the rancid little fucker could spell Cambridge Analytica on first try.
― kim jong deal (suzy), Monday, 27 November 2017 14:28 (seven years ago)
We should have a contest as to which of the Networks, plus CNN and not including Fox, is the most dishonest, corrupt and/or distorted in its political coverage of your favorite President (me). They are all bad. Winner to receive the FAKE NEWS TROPHY!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 27, 2017
― grawlix (unperson), Monday, 27 November 2017 14:39 (seven years ago)
oh cool he still remembers his Apprentice days!
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 November 2017 14:42 (seven years ago)
"your favorite President (me)." strong contender for next month's thread title
― frogbs, Monday, 27 November 2017 14:42 (seven years ago)
As in #metoo
― nashwan, Monday, 27 November 2017 14:43 (seven years ago)
plus CNN and not including Fox.hey i have a magic trick. just... wait... just close your eyes for a second
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Monday, 27 November 2017 14:51 (seven years ago)
Fox disqualified for winning the trophy 20 years in a row
― President Keyes, Monday, 27 November 2017 14:51 (seven years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THr_seahKUI
Christ on a bike
― Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 27 November 2017 14:56 (seven years ago)
Every network is FAKE NEWS except for FOX, which airs Real News about how Hillary hasn't been to the dentist in NINE months even though you're supposed to get a checkup every SIX months
― voodoo chili, Monday, 27 November 2017 14:56 (seven years ago)
I will spend every penny I have to my name to watch the live pay-per-view special of our favorite president being drawn and quartered. Like, I will sell all of my stuff. Whatever it takes.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Monday, 27 November 2017 15:02 (seven years ago)
Who knows about anything anymore, but it does seem that the tax proposals are, go figure, not only really unpopular with the millions of people they would hurt - no one seems to be buying the "middle class cut" BS - but at least as of right now, on paper, not good enough to gain enough GOP senators to pass. Or at least, on the latter front, certain hand-wringers would have to, for no clear gain, hold their nose and vote for something that explicitly violates various pledges and principles (like the deficit, or health care or whatever), but I really don't see why they would do that. I mean, of course I do, but it just seems so dumb, even by DC standards, to back off your own standards and vote for something that no one likes for the sake of, what, not entering 2018 election season in a weakened position? The way it looks now, passing something shitty for everyone (but corporations) might be even worse than not doing anything at all. At least people can run on "we're holding out for something better." It's tougher to run on "yeah, it was a terrible plan, but we needed to do something to appease corporations and big donors." Though sure, try that one out.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 November 2017 15:17 (seven years ago)
Not sure I'd count on the "better a pedophile than a Democrat" party to do the right thing for their constituents here, especially given how they've been told in no uncertain terms that the donor money was going to stop flowing if they can't get tax reform done. Then again, this bill is such an unlikeable mess. I can't fathom how this stuff gets architected - like Obamacare repeal, all you need is something that's simply "bad", but they can't even manage that!
― frogbs, Monday, 27 November 2017 15:28 (seven years ago)
Let's just do it and be legends!
― Never Learn To Mike Love (C. Grisso/McCain), Monday, 27 November 2017 15:30 (seven years ago)
Kind of like the Alabama race, it seems sort of a lose-lose.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 November 2017 15:44 (seven years ago)
unfortunately, they may lose less passing the tax bill than not. If they pass it, they piss off some voters, but please their donors and get to pocket a juicy tax cut. If they don't pass it, they lose their donors and their tax cut, while their voters will still be somewhat pissed because it seems like they aren't getting anything done. If they sense that they are going to be facing a wave election next year and will be losing their seats either way, why not at least get the juicy tax cut?
― Moodles, Monday, 27 November 2017 15:52 (seven years ago)
bc it's evil
― treeship 2, Monday, 27 November 2017 15:55 (seven years ago)
at least i hope that murkowski and mccain believe that
― treeship 2, Monday, 27 November 2017 15:56 (seven years ago)
Poll: Majority of small businesses oppose GOP tax bill
Seems an exploitable fissure in the GOP coalition.
― Sanpaku, Monday, 27 November 2017 16:02 (seven years ago)
made the mistake of watching a little Morning Joe this a.m. and they were incredulous that the Dems have not been able to make better political hay of this shitty tax bill. somehow collectively ignoring the fact that, as JiC points out, IT IS ACTUALLY MASSIVELY UNPOPULAR. aside from horse-trading I don't see what the Ds can do to actually stop this train if the GOP decides once and for all to send it down the tracks. doesn't matter if 100% of the public hates it. I guess in theory it could become as politically toxic as ACA repeal, but I think we knew all along this was going to be a far tougher sell, especially if enough people in the middle class are getting back something if only in the short term.
― evol j, Monday, 27 November 2017 16:03 (seven years ago)
Murkowski seems to support the bill so far. I don't think evil ranks very high in their list of concerns. In fact, I'd call evil their raison d'être.
― Moodles, Monday, 27 November 2017 16:06 (seven years ago)
McCain is an evil prick on the vast majority of matters so idk why he wouldn't support this (beyond political expediency/PR)
― Simon H., Monday, 27 November 2017 16:08 (seven years ago)
mccain hinting he might thumbs-dumb tax "reform" too?
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/11/mccain-recounts-obamacare-repeal-death-blow-in-new-interview.html
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 27 November 2017 16:33 (seven years ago)
McCain's sole m.o. has been complaining about "regular order" (lol) and this tax bill has been through committee and will go to the floor for amendments, which is considerably closer to "regular order" than the b.s. process that the obamacare repeal bill went through.
I bet he's a yes.
― Οὖτις, Monday, 27 November 2017 16:40 (seven years ago)
maybe he dies sitting on his thumb up
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 November 2017 16:41 (seven years ago)
CBO score is out and guess what?
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/domestic-taxes/361913-cbo-senate-tax-bill-would-hurt-poor
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 27 November 2017 17:00 (seven years ago)
Fake news
― fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Monday, 27 November 2017 17:02 (seven years ago)
will one GOPer have the guts to come out and say "poor people are subhuman" /tr3nch4n1
― brimstead, Monday, 27 November 2017 17:05 (seven years ago)
Why bother saying it when your every action clearly broadcasts the same sentiment?
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Monday, 27 November 2017 17:09 (seven years ago)
I mean, also, part of their strategy is telling credulous masochists that they're totally in their corner while they beat them up and steal their wallets.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Monday, 27 November 2017 17:11 (seven years ago)
WH: Yam will not campaign with Roy Moore
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Monday, 27 November 2017 17:13 (seven years ago)
five steps to passing this piece of shit
1. Make the bill even better for rich business owners, to win over Johnson and Daines.2. Put in a $10,000 property tax deduction – and scrap the state-and-local tax deduction for corporations – to win over Susan Collins.3. Give Lisa Murkowski some oil.4. Let the deficit hawks eat wildly optimistic growth projections.5. Convert all Senatorial seats to hereditary positions (for Republicans, not Democrats) j/k
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/11/how-the-gop-plans-to-get-its-tax-bill-out-of-the-senate.html
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 27 November 2017 17:18 (seven years ago)
Meanwhile Mick Mulvaney is now head of two federal administrative bodies.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 November 2017 17:19 (seven years ago)
"this is what dictators do"
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 27 November 2017 17:27 (seven years ago)
“It has come to my attention that Ms. English has reached out to many of you this morning via email in an attempt to exercise certain duties of the Acting Director. This is unfortunate but, in the atmosphere of the day, probably not unexpected,” he said.
“Please disregard any instructions you receive from Ms. English in her presumed capacity as acting director.” Mulvaney also asked CFPB employees to report any additional professional communications from English to the general counsel’s office.
― curmudgeon, Monday, 27 November 2017 17:54 (seven years ago)
congrats to mick mulvaney, somehow the biggest piece of shit in a piece of shit administration
― voodoo chili, Monday, 27 November 2017 18:06 (seven years ago)
mr. mulvaney should report to the lobby to pick up his commemorative sash
sounds like a fun day at work!
― Karl Malone, Monday, 27 November 2017 18:09 (seven years ago)
i hope he gets pelted with donuts in public for the rest of his life
― brimstead, Monday, 27 November 2017 18:37 (seven years ago)
literally everyone in that white house decorations video is white, including the three wise men
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Monday, 27 November 2017 19:07 (seven years ago)
House Speaker Paul Ryan told donors assembled at a Koch brothers conference in Wichita, Kansas, late last month that Republican lawmakers would tackle welfare after tax reform passes the Congress, according to two people familiar with the remarks — an idea the president mentioned last week, telling reporters that “people are taking advantage of the system."
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/27/trump-agenda-tax-reform-260405
The fun just never stops with this bunch...
― curmudgeon, Monday, 27 November 2017 19:20 (seven years ago)
"People are taking advantage of this ghost ass skeleton program that barely helps anyone live a decent life, it's got to stop"
also fuck you Bill Clinton
― The Fortnightly Intruder (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Monday, 27 November 2017 19:39 (seven years ago)
FWIW, dude knows all about taking advantage of the system.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Monday, 27 November 2017 19:49 (seven years ago)
Trump is holding this event honouring Native American code talkers, and insulting Warren as "Pocahontas," in front of a portrait of president Andrew Jackson, who signed the Indian Removal Act. pic.twitter.com/UoJpoOsoNC— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) November 27, 2017
― ... (Eazy), Monday, 27 November 2017 19:55 (seven years ago)
i don't know why white supremacists would get the impression that he's on their side, weird
― Karl Malone, Monday, 27 November 2017 20:03 (seven years ago)
He's not on their side, he's just taking up a series of interconnected positions that just so happen to align with their world view and advance their interests. That doesn't mean he's on their side per se.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Monday, 27 November 2017 20:24 (seven years ago)
Chris Geidner @chrisgeidner
Leandra English's CFPB case has been assigned to Judge Timothy J. Kelly, a Trump nominee who was confirmed to the bench in September.
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 27 November 2017 20:26 (seven years ago)
House Speaker Paul Ryan told donors assembled at a Koch brothers conference in Wichita, Kansas, late last month that Republican lawmakers would tackle welfare after tax reform passes the Congress, according to two people familiar with the remarks — an idea the president mentioned last week, telling reporters that “people are taking advantage of the system."https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/27/trump-agenda-tax-reform-260405The fun just never stops with this bunch...
what's even left to cut? are they going to go after disability? there's a fuckton of broke ass white people on disability who are trump voters, not sure if this is a good idea for them politically but they dgaf anymore
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Monday, 27 November 2017 20:27 (seven years ago)
Eh, everything'll be rigged from here on out, they don't need those gross poor people anymore.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Monday, 27 November 2017 20:31 (seven years ago)
There's a *lot* of fraud in SSDI/SSI, if some on it in my extended family are any indication. In my case, morbidly obese alcoholics eeking out their last decade on mental health disability. However, the sensible reform would establish more stringent guidelines for the judges that look at SSDI/SSI appeals, and perhaps subsidizing employment of some currently helped in less physically demanding jobs, not blanket cuts.
In a number of respects, most of those who left the welfare rolls after the 1996 reforms wound up on SSDI/SSI.
Between 1996 and 2015, the number of Americans on the SSDI rolls jumped from 7.7 million to 13 million
― Sanpaku, Monday, 27 November 2017 20:49 (seven years ago)
Society has to do something with its morbidly obese alcoholics in their last decade of life. I'm not sure that sloughing them off into the disability insurance program is precisely the definition of "fraud", since the alternative is to push them into homeless shelters, drifting in and out of hospital emergency rooms and drunk tanks. We can't just stare past them and pretend they are already dead. If SSI and Medicaid can keep them minimally viable until their liver fails, its about as good as any other program in our piss-poor social welfare apparatus.
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 27 November 2017 21:04 (seven years ago)
maybe i am simple but i can't wrap my head around why evolution-denying "conservatives" are at the same time beholden to social darwinist 'you're on your own' / 'you have no one but yourself to blame' BS
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 27 November 2017 21:15 (seven years ago)
Because Calvinism? It has nothing to do with improving the species or w/e, that's for sure.
― Conic section rebellion 44 (in orbit), Monday, 27 November 2017 21:17 (seven years ago)
It's the old "He who does not work, does not eat" Captain John Smith Mayflower bullshit.
― Conic section rebellion 44 (in orbit), Monday, 27 November 2017 21:18 (seven years ago)
― reggie (qualmsley),
Funny you should say so! I'm at this moment reading One Nation Under God: How Corporate America Invented Christian America, and a gospel of individualism was the tenet of James W. Fifeld Jr. This fellow: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_W._Fifield_Jr.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 November 2017 21:20 (seven years ago)
Because Calvinism?
Marilynn Robinson has been good in recent years explaining how many of the awful things we've been taught about Calvinism are wrong.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 November 2017 21:21 (seven years ago)
Daines and Johnson both "no" on current bill. Not sure if this is a new development, saw some grumbling from Daines earlier
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/361992-montana-republican-opposes-current-version-of-tax-bill
― Οὖτις, Monday, 27 November 2017 21:22 (seven years ago)
i can't wrap my head around why evolution-denying "conservatives" are at the same time beholden to social darwinist
Maybe it is because Social Darwinism is entirely distinct from Darwin's theory of the evolution of species. It was independently developed by social philosophers like Herbert Spencer and depends entirely on misunderstanding and misapplying the mechanisms of evolution that Darwin described.
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 27 November 2017 21:37 (seven years ago)
Whenever this "lol stupid right-wingers don't realize they're hurting themselves" stuff comes up I go back to contenderizer's post from a few months ago:
progressives often cluck about the manipulation of poor conservatives, implying that they're mooncalf rubes too dumb to know when they're voting against their own interests. this seems wrongheaded on a number of levels. for one thing, it presumes that such interests can be measured objectively. they can't. the conservatives in question likely stack their towers of relative value quite differently than most progressives. it's also condescending and plays into a well-established conservative narrative, one which holds that the american left is a coalition built cynically on graft, on stealing from the common pot in order to buy the votes of the destitute & lazy. viewed through that lens, the refusal to be so bought, even when one is genuinely needy, becomes a point of pride.― The sandwiches looked quite dank. (contenderizer), Saturday, March 18, 2017 11:00 PM (eight months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― The sandwiches looked quite dank. (contenderizer), Saturday, March 18, 2017 11:00 PM (eight months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
For at least some conservatives, the knee-jerk rejection of ideas like universal income, single-payer health care, and a robust safety net may be part of a proud "refusal to be so bought," not just "fuck those lazy brown people."
(Though there's plenty of that too.)
― here come the warm jorts (Ye Mad Puffin), Monday, 27 November 2017 21:42 (seven years ago)
not exactly watergate
"When McCrummen put her purse near Phillips’s purse to block a possible camera, Phillips moved hers." https://t.co/1P3Nxirxe8— Amy Argetsinger (@AmyArgetsinger) November 27, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 27 November 2017 21:42 (seven years ago)
(watergate-quality ratfucking i mean)
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 27 November 2017 21:43 (seven years ago)
It's interesting that both current "no" votes come from Senators no one predicted would be no votes. Johnson and this dude Daines. Plus the nebulous possible no votes of Collins, McCain, Flake, Corker ...
Basically, who knows, but the debt ceiling vote could take the steam out of this debate anyway, couldn't it? That's ... next week?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 November 2017 21:44 (seven years ago)
this is supposed to move to the floor this week, ahead of the debt ceiling votes
― Οὖτις, Monday, 27 November 2017 21:46 (seven years ago)
the plan is to vote it out of committee tomorrow, and Corker and Flake are both on the committee. If they want to kill it early here's their chance (I don't think they will)
If this does actually make it to the floor and is opened for amendments it will be interesting to see what Schumer does, I expect some theatrics
― Οὖτις, Monday, 27 November 2017 21:47 (seven years ago)
god james o’keefe is such a fucking moron
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Monday, 27 November 2017 21:49 (seven years ago)
xpost Wow, that Post story. Can someone be prosecuted for that?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 27 November 2017 21:50 (seven years ago)
nah
― Οὖτις, Monday, 27 November 2017 21:51 (seven years ago)
not a crime to lie/entrap journalists
I do like how O'Keefe can't even ratfuck properly on behalf of a pedophile though
― Οὖτις, Monday, 27 November 2017 21:52 (seven years ago)
lankford is making waves too about saying "no", holding out for revenue backdrops (ie, automatic cuts to medicare / social security when the deficit inevitably balloons)
http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/27/politics/james-lankford-republican-tax-plan/index.html
― reggie (qualmsley), Monday, 27 November 2017 21:53 (seven years ago)
the post story is a real treat
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 27 November 2017 21:53 (seven years ago)
indeed it is. some real geniuses we're looking at here
― frogbs, Monday, 27 November 2017 21:58 (seven years ago)
on a similar note
https://i.redd.it/7kmqhrud8l001.png
― frogbs, Monday, 27 November 2017 22:00 (seven years ago)
When asked who at the Daily Caller interviewed her, Phillips said, “Kathy,” pausing before adding the last name, “Johnson.”
https://simpsonswiki.com/w/images/0/0b/Joey_Jo-Jo_Junior_Shabadoo.png
― Montgomery Burns' Jazz (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Monday, 27 November 2017 22:06 (seven years ago)
ahahhahah my mind went to the same place
― frogbs, Monday, 27 November 2017 22:07 (seven years ago)
they should have just planted the fake news directly into social media, where hundreds of thousands of unsuspecting people would have taken the bait, and then blamed unnamed "leftists" for spreading their deliberate lies. they could even have rumored the WaPo was "deep in talks with woman X in preparation for running her story."
― A is for (Aimless), Monday, 27 November 2017 22:08 (seven years ago)
do it
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/retired-marine-colonel-to-launch-alabama-senate-write-in-campaign/2017/11/27/08816f4c-d394-11e7-9461-ba77d604373d_story.html
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 27 November 2017 22:29 (seven years ago)
didn't they already sorta do that? I've heard that "Someone in Alabama offered me $1000 to make up a fake Roy Moore story!" thing several times. xp
― frogbs, Monday, 27 November 2017 22:39 (seven years ago)
that is referenced in the WaPo article
― Οὖτις, Monday, 27 November 2017 22:39 (seven years ago)
people keep claiming WaPo and others are bribing people, presumably at the behest of a vast left-wing conspiracy
c'mon, as if we could stop squabbling long enough to come up with anything that dumb
― mh, Monday, 27 November 2017 22:42 (seven years ago)
the fact that they were able to watch this PV employee just walk right into the office is pretty lol
just have someone sit across from the entrance and if you suspect an interviewee, see if they show up to work for O'Keefe, I guess
― mh, Monday, 27 November 2017 22:46 (seven years ago)
xp we should try some more vast conspiracies
― voodoo chili, Monday, 27 November 2017 22:48 (seven years ago)
imo it'd be really funny to replay the situation where the reporter blocked the purse with her own purse, only instead of just seeing if the first purse got moved, just keep moving them around to block each other and see how long it goes
― mh, Monday, 27 November 2017 22:55 (seven years ago)
Curb Your Enthusiasm scene
― Οὖτις, Monday, 27 November 2017 22:56 (seven years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nISggw9WM54
― omar little, Monday, 27 November 2017 23:00 (seven years ago)
AL GOP Sen Shelby didnt vote for GOP candidate Roy Moore, instead voted for unnamed "distinguished Republican write-in” - according to @KilloughCNN— Deirdre Walsh (@deirdrewalshcnn) November 27, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 27 November 2017 23:09 (seven years ago)
I thought he already said he wrote in Sessions
― sciatica, Monday, 27 November 2017 23:13 (seven years ago)
"the distinguished racist Keebler Elf from Alabama" just didn't have the same ring to it
― Οὖτις, Monday, 27 November 2017 23:16 (seven years ago)
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 November 2017 23:16 (seven years ago)
shelby's in the club
http://img1.etsystatic.com/000/0/5900221/il_340x270.309466889.jpg
― maura, Monday, 27 November 2017 23:22 (seven years ago)
A handy rundown of James OKeefe’s bullshit and when he got back on it:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/935272597520076803
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 00:09 (seven years ago)
http://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPrBngaVwAALNHS.jpgthis guy is likely headed for jail afore he turns fifty
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 00:18 (seven years ago)
Well, yeah.
― Never Learn To Mike Love (C. Grisso/McCain), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 00:21 (seven years ago)
would also accept an early grave
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 00:22 (seven years ago)
He’s arrested and convicted multiple times, hasn’t he, but never actually gone to jail?
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 02:00 (seven years ago)
that always seemed curious to me too, but i'd guess he probably has a long list of republican assholes willing to anonymously provide him bail and good representation in court
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 02:29 (seven years ago)
the conservatives in question likely stack their towers of relative value quite differently than most progressives. it's also condescending and plays into a well-established conservative narrative, one which holds that the american left is a coalition built cynically on graft, on stealing from the common pot in order to buy the votes of the destitute & lazy. viewed through that lens, the refusal to be so bought, even when one is genuinely needy, becomes a point of pride.― The sandwiches looked quite dank. (contenderizer), Saturday, March 18, 2017 11:00 PM (eight months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
this is good. i agree with this.
― New Jersey (treeship 2), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 03:11 (seven years ago)
The woman at the center of the failed James O’Keefe sting, who got laid off from her real estate job and decided her next move was to become an undercover conservative journalist who lives off crowdfunding, is living a DeLillo novel.— Will Sommer (@willsommer) November 28, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 03:15 (seven years ago)
You’d think that given all their anti-Communist positions Project Veritas would try harder to not be publicly owned— Andres Pertierra (@ASPertierra) November 27, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 03:22 (seven years ago)
XD
― crüt, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 03:59 (seven years ago)
the refusal to be so bought, even when one is genuinely needy, becomes a point of pride
seems at odds w the propensity of red states to suck hard on the federal teat
― the late great, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 04:17 (seven years ago)
whites also benefit disproportionately from social safety nets etc
― the late great, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 04:19 (seven years ago)
it's totally hypocritical for sure but the stories people tell about themselves are still, i think, important to account for
― New Jersey (treeship 2), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 04:20 (seven years ago)
It's not that important
― Frederik B, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 10:21 (seven years ago)
publicly owned lol
― here come the warm jorts (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 11:34 (seven years ago)
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 14:02 (seven years ago)
Seriously. I've been wondering lately about all these assholes concerned about Mexicans or immigrants or black people taking away their opportunities ... what do they think when they lose jobs and other opportunities to other white people? Same with the assholes that sue when they don't get into college. Why assume it was affirmative action that cost you your spot, and not that it was taken by some other white person? Basically, fuck all you blame-game losers. Blame everyone if you want, white people included, but then vote for politicians and policies that will help everyone. Unless of course you think you need a special leg up, in which case, again, fuck you for your sense of entitlement.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 14:27 (seven years ago)
whoa, James O'Keefe went from wormy youth to "looks like he's 45" really fast
― mh, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 15:04 (seven years ago)
mendacity is a helluva drug
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 15:05 (seven years ago)
tbh I probably look the same, I just dress like a slovenly teen to disguise my bloated gaze
― mh, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 15:06 (seven years ago)
xxxpost Perpetual absolution is a perk of tribal affiliation. All blame is to be directed at the Other we've gone to great pains to construct as our scapegoat. We're always right, they're always wrong. It's as simple as that.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 15:10 (seven years ago)
New poll shows Moore ahead by 5 pts >:(
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 15:16 (seven years ago)
See previous post.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 15:18 (seven years ago)
he's going to win. the story broke two weeks too soon. the voters have had way too long to rationalize this.
― frogbs, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 15:18 (seven years ago)
Like, the dude could just cop to doing all of the shit he's been accused of and he'd probably still win.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 15:19 (seven years ago)
Meeting with “Chuck and Nancy” today about keeping government open and working. Problem is they want illegal immigrants flooding into our Country unchecked, are weak on Crime and want to substantially RAISE Taxes. I don’t see a deal!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 28, 2017
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 15:24 (seven years ago)
disappointed he doesn't call them "Nuck and Chancy"
― President Keyes, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 15:26 (seven years ago)
is trump’s habit of Randomly capitalising Words a new Thing or is it just that i Notice it more in twitter’s new 280-character Hellscape
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 15:49 (seven years ago)
Xp on okeefe i saw and thought “whoa problem is you going full-Bannon, never go full-Bannon.”
― correlated noise of conformity (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 15:53 (seven years ago)
WASHINGTON (AP) - Top Democrats in Congress abruptly pull out of White House meeting after President Trump's Twitter attack.— Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) November 28, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 16:38 (seven years ago)
heh
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 16:39 (seven years ago)
ART OF THE DEAL, BABY!!
― frogbs, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 16:39 (seven years ago)
Wow, without the participation of "top Democrats," the administration will be unable to... uh, will be prevented from... uh, will find it harder to, uh....
― here come the warm jorts (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 16:51 (seven years ago)
Good news is that if the Top Dems pull out, than illegal immigrants can flood in
― voodoo chili, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 16:52 (seven years ago)
*then not than, obv
they will be unable to pass a budget and the government will shut down
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 16:56 (seven years ago)
Keeping the government open requires 60 votes. Now, if your argument is that Trump wants to be seen as responsible for a government shutdown next month, that's fine, but I don't believe it. McConnell for damn sure doesn't.
― grawlix (unperson), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 16:57 (seven years ago)
Nancy & Chuck say it’s a waste of time to talk to Trump, and cancel meeting today at White House pic.twitter.com/00lT6fi4Cz— Michael C. Bender (@MichaelCBender) November 28, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 16:59 (seven years ago)
Trump's moves are pretty obvious if that happens - blame the Dems, whip up his base. But it'll be a game of chicken re: who caves first, and I suspect the Dems actually care about keeping the gov't running more than the plutocrat anarchists on the other side. Trump v clearly does not give a fuck if there even is a gov't, apart from a militarized force that kills brown people.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:00 (seven years ago)
are we sure that's how it's going to be covered/perceived though (and I don't mean by Breitbart, I mean by like CNN)? if the GOP theoretically had all its ducks in a row for keeping the government running and the Dems denied them the 8 additional votes or whatever they needed to hit 60, wouldn't the Dems look like the bad guys?
― evol j, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:01 (seven years ago)
as we saw with previous GOP shenanigans in this regard, the obstructionists get blamed, not the party in power. But idk w Trump the political calculus is a little different. It def doesn't testify to his "dealmaking" skills if he can't even keep the gov't open.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:01 (seven years ago)
if the GOP theoretically had all its ducks in a row for keeping the government running
this is a v big "if", btw, because currently they definitely don't.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:02 (seven years ago)
i know the Dems want to tie this to things like the Dreamers that are very right and good but I don't know if you can sell a government shutdown on that principle. maybe disaster relief?
― evol j, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:03 (seven years ago)
Ok y'all but nobody voted for him thinking he would make deals with Democrats to keep the government open
― here come the warm jorts (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:05 (seven years ago)
they were only interested in his ability to make "deals" that cause lib tears and that harm people of color
― here come the warm jorts (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:06 (seven years ago)
The GOP has clearly been deeply wounded by their six years of obstructionism under Obama. Hopefully something will go their way someday, poor lil guys.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:08 (seven years ago)
i do think the calculus is different when the president is on record as saying "what this country needs is a good shutdown", and his party controls government (yes, not to the extent required to prevent a shutdown without democratic help, but that's a detail that will be lost on most people)
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:12 (seven years ago)
Also when the president is as staggeringly unpopular as Trump.
― grawlix (unperson), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:15 (seven years ago)
maybe disaster relief?
this is a huge deal, esp considering one of the states impacts is Texas, ie home of Senate majority lickspittle John Cornyn
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:18 (seven years ago)
We need disaster relief from Trump, they should put that in the budget.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:42 (seven years ago)
i think it's difficult to predict how a shutdown would be perceived right now. democrats are generally more shocked and insulted by a shutdown than republicans. breitbart right-wingers believe that the government SHOULD stay shut down - that is, the "essential" fed workforce could stay to keep the lights on, and everyone that is "non-essential" should just fuck off for life.
whether it's intended or not, and putting aside the idea of truth, one of the primary messages of the trump administration to the US public is that the federal government really doesn't matter that much to the everyday person. trump can appoint cabinet members who are openly opposed to the agencies that they head (pruitt, mulvaney, perry), threaten to pull out of international treaties that were thought to be sacrosanct, , gut the state department, praise mass murderers (duterte) and repeatedly insult longtime allies...and yet to his average supporter, nothing much has changed. the sky hasn't fallen, they probably have some sort of job, the holidays are here and family is around. things are ok.
influence and power doesn't just dissipate - it shifts to other entities. corporatism is nothing new, of course, but it really seems to have accelerated in the trump administration. even the core purposes of government - to provide rule of law and protection - are being handed over to the private sector. when facebook/twitter/google were taken to task for their platform's role in the election re: fake news, they sent their lawyers to congress, not the CEOs. that's not necessarily a measure of how seriously they take the issue, but it is an indication of how seriously they take the threat of criticism from congress. the questions from the congress reps reinforced that - the message seemed to be that the tech corps should do a better job regulating themselves, or else congress would be forced to begin thinking about the possibility of doing something. maybe.
i have a wackier version of this dumb theory that involves corporate-dependent virtual reality, and who would be the de facto "government" in such environments, but i'll spare the thread. but in general, i think we're all, collectively, witnessing the accelerating usurping of the governmental system as the protector of basic rights. every govt shutdown reinforces that to some degree, as everyday norms who don't pay attention to politics hear something about a govt shutdown but also notice that their everyday lives don't seem to be affected that much. there are short-term political consequences and it can lead to democrats "winning" the shutdown, but these shutdowns also inflict more lasting damage by alienating civilians from the government.
imo
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:45 (seven years ago)
your second paragraph pretty much summarizes the reagan administration also. not a criticism, more of "i pray we come out better from this this time around."
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:49 (seven years ago)
Drudge, Olbermann and Scarborough all tweeting that something big is coming down. Olbermann is ending all his political commentary, and Scarborough says he's "taking down all Trump tweets. Too 2017."
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:56 (seven years ago)
Lucy with the football: "the oppo dump/pee tape is imminent! tick tick tick"
― here come the warm jorts (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 17:58 (seven years ago)
xposts yeah, it's definitely not a new development, but i do think it's accelerating. and also - very anecdotally - no one seems to care!
part of it is the nature of the threats to our democracy really are changing in ways that the current configuration of our government doesn't seem equipped to combat. i think the facebook/twitter/fake news thing is a good example of the dilemma. should the government be screening all social media posts and trying to identify which ones are fake? that seems like a terrible idea and a terrible precedent, after all, what if some evil incompetent administration somehow took power...oh wait, we're already in hell. what else can the government do, though? rely on tech giants to police their own platforms? maybe, but that's a thorny issue even for politicians well-versed in modern technology. and let's face it, a disturbing portion of our representatives have no fucking clue about any of this stuff. some of them don't even use email because they decided in the early 90s that they were never going to even try to learn because it was too hard.
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:01 (seven years ago)
I do think "normies" who don't generally care/have any idea of what the gov't does do notice when their checks stop coming, when parks are closed, and when services break down.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:04 (seven years ago)
and they'll be furious at the democrats for making it hppen
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:07 (seven years ago)
If nothing else, they'll probably perk up once the nukes start falling.
― Moodles, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:08 (seven years ago)
when parks are closed
This was played for demagogic lulz last time around.
Very few people are driving up to a national park (e.g. Yellowstone) and getting turned away. They have gates, you drive on a specific access road, there are services requiring staff, you plan to go there, you have reservations for stuff.
But consider something like the WWII memorial - a bunch of sculptures in a readily accessible location, three yards from a public sidewalk. Having it closed off by inadequate barricades just provided a talking point for Limbaugh & co.: "The Democrats are keeping WWII vets away from the WWII memorial!!!eleventy!!!
― here come the warm jorts (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:11 (seven years ago)
Or what bg said
― here come the warm jorts (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:12 (seven years ago)
i'm just saying, would it be that weird if in 2024 Amazon runs for president? just imagine - vote for Amazon for president, and they'll pledge to reorganize the structure of the government, re-invest all profits back into the company/country, free amazon prime for 2 years for every citizen who writes 5 or more reviews and agrees to buy certain necessities using Alexa, and every two months there's a national referendum on which Amazon Original tv pilots are greenlighted for production.
i'm being stupid as usual but imagine this choice right now, in alabama:
- roy moore- liberal jones- two years of Amazon Prime for free, plus Amazon runs Alabama now
does anyone think Amazon would get < 30% of the vote?
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:13 (seven years ago)
some of them don't even use email because they decided in the early 90s that they were never going to even try to learn because it was too hard.
this was smart
that's why we elected them
― j., Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:13 (seven years ago)
lol it was kind of prescient
― Karl Malone, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:14 (seven years ago)
On the topic of normal people and their political interaction, I feel like I'm an outlier talking to a couple friends who are pretty wired into politics. They're relatively mainstream - one friend mentioned he listens to a Rachel Maddow podcast and the Young Turks or w/e daily, and another was talking about Alec Baldwin being great at a state democrats benefit dinner
idk, none of that stuff appeals to me and aspects of it turn me off
― mh, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:14 (seven years ago)
Maddow and Baldwin are awful
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:16 (seven years ago)
KM, there is basically no bottom to the despair-inducing absurdity and stupidity that I expect to see within my lifetime (even if I drop dead within, say, the next couple of years), so I think your suppositions are beyond plausible.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:17 (seven years ago)
Melania, our great and very hard working First Lady, who truly loves what she is doing, always thought that “if you run, you will win.” She would tell everyone that, “no doubt, he will win.” I also felt I would win (or I would not have run) - and Country is doing great!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 28, 2017
this is charmingly gratuitous
so much anxiety
― j., Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:19 (seven years ago)
first time he's praised Melania since forcing her to sign the prenup
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:20 (seven years ago)
Maddow seems overblown but relatively innocuous, Baldwin really feels like his real life existence is a cliched version of the roles he has in movies -- the old alpha white guy who isn't at all with it, but has an exaggerated sense of self-importance that other people roll with because older white men still notionally signify power.
― mh, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:20 (seven years ago)
Country is doing great!
Well, Brad Paisley and Keith Urban and Miranda Lambert have all had pretty strong hits, so that's a'ight. Maybe that Las Vegas concert was kind of a bummer note, but still, doing great! Thanks, Trump!
― here come the warm jorts (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:31 (seven years ago)
counterpoint
Grammy Nominations: No Country Artists in Top Categories for First Time in 14 Years https://t.co/nmwDuUrKMS via @variety— Chris Willman (@ChrisWillman) November 28, 2017
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:36 (seven years ago)
agrees to buy certain necessities using Alexa, and every two months there's a national referendum on which Amazon Original tv pilots are greenlighted for production.
For further reference, see also: Infinite Jest, David Foster Wallace
― A is for (Aimless), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:41 (seven years ago)
Yeah, I do keep thinking that the Year of the Depend Adult Undergarment must be right around the corner. It no longer seems unlikely.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:43 (seven years ago)
who truly loves what she is doing
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:53 (seven years ago)
so was today's twitter tick tock reveal that the Turkish guy flipped?
― Evan, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:55 (seven years ago)
Old Lunch, my fave is still Year of the Whisper-Quiet Maytag Dishmaster, which iirc is 2006(?). Subsidized Time doesn't reach up to the present day.
― here come the warm jorts (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 18:57 (seven years ago)
that seems to be drudge's only big news that wasn't about the grammys
― akm, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 19:04 (seven years ago)
both sides are bad
https://theintercept.com/2017/11/28/blackwaters-erik-prince-met-with-ceo-of-russian-direct-investment-fund/
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 19:46 (seven years ago)
just a very chill normal meeting where the real-life equivalent of big boss from metal gear solid attempts to open a back-channel communication between two enemy states over a beer on a paradise island
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:07 (seven years ago)
tax bill clears committee 12-11 on partisan lines
so Johnson's been appeased somehow
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:15 (seven years ago)
shit's gonna pass
Sen Susan Collins says “a lot of my concerns are being addressed,” leaning toward supporting the tax bill after meeting with Trump and Senate Republicans— Ryan Grim (@ryangrim) November 28, 2017
there's this sad/annoying dynamic in the Senate involving "moderate"/"swing" votes clearly reveling in their opportunity to hog the spotlight and play-act as "serious legislators with principles" or whatever, just ego-stroking nonsense that more often than not results in (surprise) strictly partisan votes. McCain does this all the time. Lieberman did it too.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:26 (seven years ago)
can't wait until the economy tanks because of this bullshit, and we MUST cut medicare / social security because OMG spending problem!
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:28 (seven years ago)
this won't tank the economy
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:29 (seven years ago)
at least, not immediately and not directly. corporate malfeasance usually tanks the economy.
if i'm the dems i say, 'fine, pass this shit. none of us are voting to keep the government open next month, and you need 60 votes. fuck you'
― reggie (qualmsley), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:33 (seven years ago)
a likely outcome
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:38 (seven years ago)
Johnson's been appeasedego-stroking
ego-stroking
― here come the warm jorts (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:43 (seven years ago)
I don't think that the Senate Democrats refusing to keep the federal government operating would dismay the Republicans. It'd be like the Dems were throwing Br'er Rabbit into the briar patch. Nor would it improve the Democrats' standing with voters. There's no real benefit in it for them.
― A is for (Aimless), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:43 (seven years ago)
it's what their constituency wants, so there's that
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:45 (seven years ago)
or at least it's what their energized base wants
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:46 (seven years ago)
also it's not just the Senate - there are enough Dems in the House who require a DACA deal as part of the budget that would tank it there too
I can't figure out why anyone would think that shutting down most government services would punish Republicans even slightly. But it would punish a lot of ordinary people who rely on government services. It's madness imo, especially since the debt ceiling would need to be raised eventually anyway and the Republicans can outwait the Democrats without having to make any concessions in the end.
― A is for (Aimless), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:51 (seven years ago)
I'm not advocating it as a strategy btw, it just seems like what Pelosi and Schumer are willing to do.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:53 (seven years ago)
I'm sure their political calculus is that if they don't at least participate in some brinksmanship, their base will feel betrayed and they will take a ton of heat from angry Dems.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:54 (seven years ago)
at the very least I'm sure they are looking at which GOP votes they can peel off for a DACA deal - I think there's already one House GOP member whose come out as supporting it, and there's definitely others.
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 20:55 (seven years ago)
Trump on the North Korean missile launch: "We will take care of it." "It is a situation that we will handle. With that being said, Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi did not show up for our meeting today."— Daniel Dale (@ddale8) November 28, 2017
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:00 (seven years ago)
I wonder if Trump thinks that if the gov. shuts down, he can just go golfing and/or chill in NYC more?
― Never Learn To Mike Love (C. Grisso/McCain), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:02 (seven years ago)
Apologies for image size, if it's an issue:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPv4Pw-W0AAJW19.jpg
― grawlix (unperson), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:05 (seven years ago)
Oh man what do those handwritten notes say
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:06 (seven years ago)
dickbutt.jpg
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:09 (seven years ago)
Tongue inside mouth.
Water glass is not a potty.
Tee-hee, Pocahontas, ha ha.
― here come the warm jorts (Ye Mad Puffin), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:09 (seven years ago)
god, you're allegedly a fucking billionaire, hire a tailor!!!!!
― j., Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:13 (seven years ago)
The handwriting of his notes is so large.
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:13 (seven years ago)
It looks like a setlist from an indie show.
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:20 (seven years ago)
how much do you want to bet Trump needs reading glasses like the majority of adults over a certain age and he refuses to use them and just has everything written in giant block letters
― mh, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:24 (seven years ago)
bifocals sap the strength of the eyes
― j., Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:25 (seven years ago)
Dude only uses black/gold Sharpies, doesn’t he?
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:26 (seven years ago)
Oh, he definitely does. But I have seen literally one picture of him wearing them. It's also possible he has a reading disorder, and/or that might be related to his issue with stairs.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:41 (seven years ago)
http://cdn.washingtonexaminer.biz/cache/1060x600-587c93bf2547c337ed49c0d6bed779ae.jpg
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:42 (seven years ago)
my new conspiracy theory is that Barron doesn't have a learning disability -- he's the most intelligent member of the family and they're keeping it under wraps because it irritates the rest of them
― mh, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:43 (seven years ago)
The tape, without question, is real https://t.co/KmvOE5qzAz— The New York Times (@nytimes) November 28, 2017
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:53 (seven years ago)
no need to click this btw, just sharing for the urlhttp://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2017/11/28/billy-bush-posts-hospital-selfie-after-getting-hit-with-golf-ball.html
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:56 (seven years ago)
xpost man what a bait-and-switch from the NYT
― crüt, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:58 (seven years ago)
damn k3vin, way to mislead I thought I was gonna be getting some actual yellow journalism.
― omar little, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 21:59 (seven years ago)
:)
― k3vin k., Tuesday, 28 November 2017 22:00 (seven years ago)
jfc NYT is so clickbaity
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 22:05 (seven years ago)
https://www.theonion.com/the-onion-has-obtained-exclusive-information-from-jai-1820808638
― mh, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 22:09 (seven years ago)
of course
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/2017/11/28/3aa11fe6-d479-11e7-b62d-d9345ced896d_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_no-name%3Apage%2Fbreaking-news-bar&tidr=a_breakingnews&utm_term=.f9a97d19399c
― Οὖτις, Tuesday, 28 November 2017 22:23 (seven years ago)
Unreadable, alashttps://i.imgur.com/oPw8fQ4.jpg
― attention vampire (MatthewK), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 00:30 (seven years ago)
http://blogs.iac.gatech.edu/mgirardi3/files/2015/03/img_00151.png
― gimme the beet poison, free my soul (Doctor Casino), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 00:36 (seven years ago)
https://i.pinimg.com/236x/ea/1a/ff/ea1aff649499acbda83d99ddaf966652--simpsons-quotes-the-simpsons.jpg
― nashwan, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 00:39 (seven years ago)
Unreadable, alas
Enhance! Enhance! Enhance!
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 00:58 (seven years ago)
eisenhower's top marginal rate
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 01:28 (seven years ago)
So Collins, Corker and Johnson reportedly moving yes-ward? I just don't fucking get it, even on its face this thing is a mess.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 01:31 (seven years ago)
get this. americans who grow up in wealthy families are better / smarter/ more talented than everyone else, to the extent that taxing their parents will destroy the economy, and allow the russians, i mean the soviets to win. goodnight to the rock & roll era
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 01:34 (seven years ago)
Their deepest desire is to further enrich themselves and their friends while burying everyone else. The only thing that gives them pause is a vague worry that they are being too obvious. Any negotiations that are happening are just about how to best apply the lipstick to this pig without diluting their sweet payout.
― Moodles, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 01:39 (seven years ago)
they deflect their apprehension of climate catastrophe onto bizarre randian galt games. northern canada will host new kansas
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 01:42 (seven years ago)
Here's a one-two
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/from-access-hollywood-to-russia-trump-seeks-to-paint-the-rosiest-picture/2017/11/28/9e253bc4-d451-11e7-95bf-df7c19270879_story.html
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/28/us/politics/trump-access-hollywood-tape.html
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 02:10 (seven years ago)
the president of the united states is engaged in ongoing quid pro quo with former KGB agents now running russia. what is mr. trump hiding? where's the tax returns?
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 02:22 (seven years ago)
Both articles as usual missed the opportunity to remind readers that Trump's childhood preacher - and the guy who officiated his first wedding - was literally the guy who wrote The Power of Positive Thinking.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 02:23 (seven years ago)
donald trump was literally seeking to build the TRUMP MOSCOW during the 2016 presidential republican primary. if i'm JEB! i sue this spiral combover fuck for the 2015 trump campaign email correspondence ledger
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 02:33 (seven years ago)
― correlated noise of conformity (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 05:02 (seven years ago)
his notes look like ricky mccormicks
― nxd, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 09:30 (seven years ago)
?hpid=hp_no-name_no-name%3Apage%2Fbreaking-news-bar&tidr=a_breakingnews&utm_term=.f9a97d19399cof course
― shackling the masses with plastic-wrapped snack picks (sic), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 10:07 (seven years ago)
Welp, the POTUS is retweeting snuff films, I think we're done here.
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:05 (seven years ago)
holy shit
he's retweeting racist propaganda videos from the leader of Britain First
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:10 (seven years ago)
WHAT THE FUCK
The Dutch video he rt'd: not a muslim, not a migrant, but a Dutch boy who was apprehended already. Fuck this guy.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:13 (seven years ago)
What does this twat need to do to get impeached?
― thomasintrouble, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:13 (seven years ago)
A new low. I didn't think he could still find those.
― "Taste's very strange!" (stevie), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:25 (seven years ago)
get Democrats elected
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:25 (seven years ago)
Trump sharing Britain First. Let that sink in. The President of the United States is promoting a fascist, racist, extremist hate group whose leaders have been arrested and convicted. He is no ally or friend of ours. @realDonaldTrump you are not welcome in my country and my city.— David Lammy (@DavidLammy) November 29, 2017
― Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:28 (seven years ago)
don't worry I'm sure there will be so consequences for this and it won't affect his approval numbers at all
― frogbs, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:31 (seven years ago)
Racist gonna racist.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:32 (seven years ago)
Trump has legitimised the far right in his own country, now he’s trying to do it in ours. Spreading hatred has consequences & the President should be ashamed of himself.— Brendan Cox (@MrBrendanCox) November 29, 2017
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:34 (seven years ago)
Maybe we do need a government shutdown. Sort of like a strike. Let all this shit stop for a while and help us all reset. Focus attention on the real problem, which is Trump.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:35 (seven years ago)
Show him what government does, show once and for all that most if this country will not stand for his bullshit.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:36 (seven years ago)
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, DONALD TRUMP, HAS RETWEETED THREE OF DEPUTY LEADER JAYDA FRANSEN'S TWITTER VIDEOS! DONALD TRUMP HIMSELF HAS RETWEETED THESE VIDEOS AND HAS AROUND 44 MILLION FOLLOWERS! GOD BLESS YOU TRUMP! GOD BLESS AMERICA! OCS @JaydaBF @realDonaldTrump pic.twitter.com/Cym2XCVpN9— Britain First (@BritainFirstHQ) November 29, 2017
smdh
― Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:37 (seven years ago)
That is beyond belief, even for a piece of shit who has stretched and ripped my credulity in the past. I cannot believe this could pass without consequence. It takes a fair bit to shock me these days but that really shocks me.
― attention vampire (MatthewK), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:37 (seven years ago)
IIRC Trump is only one member of the GOP, if we’re talking about the real problem
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:37 (seven years ago)
(xpost) Same.
― Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:38 (seven years ago)
is this getting traction for the shock that it is?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:41 (seven years ago)
Top Guardian story online.
― kim jong deal (suzy), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:43 (seven years ago)
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/nov/29/trump-account-retweets-anti-muslim-videos-of-british-far-right-leader
― attention vampire (MatthewK), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:47 (seven years ago)
This'll drop Brexit shambles off the UK news agenda for a bit. SO SMAT.
― nashwan, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:52 (seven years ago)
nytimes not awake yet i guess
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:52 (seven years ago)
Please, someone tell us again that Pence wouldn't be any better than this human diarrhea spray.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:56 (seven years ago)
A critical mass of reports to Twitter objecting to BF and Il Douché might rid one platform of the former.
― kim jong deal (suzy), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:56 (seven years ago)
Matt Lauer business gonna completely overshadow this in the US
― voodoo chili, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:56 (seven years ago)
Even Paul Joseph Wasteman is giving Trump the side-eye on this shit
― damian green is people (NickB), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:59 (seven years ago)
that truly is incredible. when you've lost Mr. Infowars...
― frogbs, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 13:01 (seven years ago)
Like Salacious Crumb being offended by Jabba.
― nashwan, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 13:08 (seven years ago)
josh otm. a reverse 'atlas shrugged' might slap some sense into koch / fox nation, if not the kochs and murdoch gang themselves
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 13:12 (seven years ago)
tombot otm"party of trump" forever. grind them to dust. they'll teach schoolkids about republicans some day. "what was that, daddy?" "bad people, sweetie"
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 13:18 (seven years ago)
I know this has been a hell morning (even moreso than others) but man some of y'all are dreaming in five dimensions
― Simon H., Wednesday, 29 November 2017 13:18 (seven years ago)
All three of those videos posted by Jayda Fransen and retweeted by Trump are moe than 6 months old. 2 are from 2013. pic.twitter.com/W1r62uKXs1— Alastair Reid (@ajreid) November 29, 2017
― Chuck_Tatum, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 13:21 (seven years ago)
The GOP has been sick since January 1981. Trump is the culmination. Never forget.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 13:22 (seven years ago)
5-D dream chess
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 13:22 (seven years ago)
Mark my words—the bigoted films tweeted out by Trump today will be used as evidence of his discriminatory intent by the State’s Attorneys General challenging the travel ban. https://t.co/i4XvMtSKmY
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 13:31 (seven years ago)
The Dutch Boy one features an assailant who is both Dutch and not a Muslin. I was going to say "Notably..", but who the fuck even knows what matters anymore?
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 13:58 (seven years ago)
Good time to remind the US that the guy who assassinated a British member of parliament, female of course, last year shouted Britain First as he was murdering her.
― Action of Boyle Man Prompts Visitor to Stay (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 13:59 (seven years ago)
yes i posted a tweet by her widower upthread
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:00 (seven years ago)
Once it's clear that Trump has predictably suffered no substantive backlash from this latest stunt, I'll be comfortable declaring that nothing matters anymore.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:01 (seven years ago)
Shut down the government.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:03 (seven years ago)
I'll declare it right now, there will be no backlash, nothing's mattered for 2 years now
― frogbs, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:04 (seven years ago)
just a complete pile of fucking shit he is, i really have no constructive words at all. it's so utterly depressing to see this shit every fucking day
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:05 (seven years ago)
I think I can pinpoint "check out sex tape!!" as the exact moment where I started to regret ever finding this man amusing because he clowned on Jeb Bush
― frogbs, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:07 (seven years ago)
hopelessness is useless and helps your enemies
― Simon H., Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:12 (seven years ago)
OK, OL: Pence wouldn't be any better than this human diarrhea spray.
Think about the real-world consequences, not just the simian behavior
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:12 (seven years ago)
morbs OTM having Pence in there would give the GOP no excuses to get behind whatever shit the WH pushes
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:14 (seven years ago)
the only benefit to Pence (beyond propriety) would be a potential slight decrease in confidence among outspoken white supremacists, and even that's highly debatable
― Simon H., Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:16 (seven years ago)
whoa did Trump just reference the dead intern story
So now that Matt Lauer is gone when will the Fake News practitioners at NBC be terminating the contract of Phil Griffin? And will they terminate low ratings Joe Scarborough based on the “unsolved mystery” that took place in Florida years ago? Investigate!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 29, 2017
― frogbs, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:18 (seven years ago)
wait until Moore wins a Senate seat
― frogbs, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:20 (seven years ago)
that last post now deleted
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:21 (seven years ago)
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, November 29, 2017 8:12 AM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Counterpoint: Trump's simian behavior has real-world consequences beyond the legislative. Even if he never manages to accomplish anything of significance, imagine what effect four (or, hey, why not eight or more!) years of this behavior will have upon the country and the culture. We might very well have an explicit Nazi party by the time 2020 rolls around.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:22 (seven years ago)
xp lmao he just fixed a typo
― frogbs, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:22 (seven years ago)
Someone literally murdered a woman last year while he shouted Britain First. So stop claiming this has no 'real world consequences'.
― Frederik B, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:28 (seven years ago)
He should banned from entering the UK, he won't be as long as the Tories are in charge.
― Action of Boyle Man Prompts Visitor to Stay (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:31 (seven years ago)
this is an even crazier than usual morning, I kinda wonder if Trump's reacting to something
― frogbs, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:31 (seven years ago)
Tumor pressing harder against his brain
― .oO (silby), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:35 (seven years ago)
And will they terminate low ratings Joe Scarborough based on the “unsolved mystery” that took place in Florida years ago?
ok this made me smile
― President Keyes, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:44 (seven years ago)
re: Trump vs Pence or Ryan, it's a toss-up, do you want a fringe-loon-emboldening but largely ineffective administration or do you want a polite one that "respects the office" and implements virtually the same agenda with (we can imagine) relative precision and efficiency
― Simon H., Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:44 (seven years ago)
That seems to way overestimate the precision and efficiency of Pence and Ryan...
― Frederik B, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:48 (seven years ago)
Very possibly.
― Simon H., Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:51 (seven years ago)
A summary of the latest Flynn findings.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:52 (seven years ago)
i don't give a swift shit about weighing up the relative merits of pence and ryan, i want this piece of garbage gone
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 14:59 (seven years ago)
Gonna pass the Senate: https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/29/senate-republicans-tax-plan-votes-267923?lo=ap_c1
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 15:00 (seven years ago)
Trump's simian behavior has real-world consequences beyond the legislative
Sure. So in balancing the different nightmares, it's likely they come out somewhere near equivalent.
(unless we get nuked next week)
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 15:31 (seven years ago)
Morbs…otm?
― .oO (silby), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 15:48 (seven years ago)
lol the tax plan was never in doubt
― frogbs, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 15:53 (seven years ago)
― frogbs, Wednesday, November 29, 2017 9:04 AM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
yup
― marcos, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 15:54 (seven years ago)
And see, that is almost the purest distillation of what I fear will happen the longer he's allowed to occupy the big boy seat. How long will it take for people in general to start behaving in kind? If the president can just do and say whatever without ever suffering any consequences, why don't I give that a try?
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:04 (seven years ago)
What fucking incentive do we have to aspire to any higher ground when the POS running the country demonstrably gives zero shits about anything or anyone but himself?
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:06 (seven years ago)
it happens; a recent president normalized drone wars and on-demand surveillance
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:08 (seven years ago)
I don't really get why anyone pays attention to Trump's tweets tbh, he's just trolling the opposition/riling up his fanbase. outside of the legal ramifications (which are all, generally speaking bad for him) seems like the wiser course of action is to ignore them.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:09 (seven years ago)
the fallout from this will perhaps further weaken and distract teresa may a little bit, so there's that
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:11 (seven years ago)
checking out the account of the person who he retweeted, the britain first deputy leader, this morning she's been interviewed by CBS, BBC. probably more. so yeah, lots of publicity for this person/group that i had never heard of until i woke up today. mission accomplished for trump
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:15 (seven years ago)
the POS running the country demonstrably gives zero shits about anything or anyone but himself
enh that pretty neatly mirrors how american empire has felt about pursuing its interests for pretty much forever
― Simon H., Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:15 (seven years ago)
the logical endpoint of exceptionalism
― Simon H., Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:17 (seven years ago)
gonna leave this here (again)
http://coreyrobin.com/2017/02/15/stop-freaking-out-about-pence/
― voodoo chili, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:21 (seven years ago)
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, November 29, 2017 10:09 AM (six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
The problem being that every tweet you ignore is a tweet that's stoking the fires of who knows how many hate-fueled homunculi. At the very best, it normalizes the internet comments section as a legitimate form of discourse.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:21 (seven years ago)
At WH, @PressSec defends Pres Trump retweets today of videos purporting Muslim violence saying "these are real threats we have to talk about." Whether the videos are real or not, Sanders says "the threats are real - no matter how you look at it." pic.twitter.com/K8JMqHctp5— Mark Knoller (@markknoller) November 29, 2017
― correlated noise of conformity (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:25 (seven years ago)
WTF UGH
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:28 (seven years ago)
from the Robin link:
Second, it makes no sense to think Pence is super effective and powerful, on the one hand, yet has simply suffered the unfortunate happenstance of being stymied by Trump. If Pence were such a great politico, he would be making his mastery felt, in spite of Trump. Nothing suggests that he has. As far as we know, the guy is just a standard right winger with a granite face. He may be really good at what he does, but before we freak out about him, let’s have a better sense of his political potency and efficacy.
otm. Trump won because he's unique. Pence is a nothing. He may sign horrible legislation, but we expected it from Trump in January too.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:30 (seven years ago)
yep, the only thing of substance I can even recall Pence TRYING to do recently was get McCain over the line on ACA repeal, and he failed miserably.
― evol j, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:37 (seven years ago)
how many people do u think take their moral cues from the president of the united states? ime most ppl consider themselves better people than the president no matter who the president is at the time.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:39 (seven years ago)
Mordy is correct here ime
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:39 (seven years ago)
tho I do think Trump's dgaf-ness will embolden future corrupt political candidates
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:40 (seven years ago)
yeah i mean bc of Trump it's been easy to forget how much people despise Mike Pence, and also how empty and dumb and dull and (quite fortunately!) uncharismatic he is.
― omar little, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:40 (seven years ago)
How many awful people have become more comfortable about proudly expressing their awfulness over the past year? How many more do you think will follow within the next three? And do you honestly think that Trump's running commentary has no direct effect on that phenomenon?
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:41 (seven years ago)
remember that October article in The New Yorker? His own party thought he's a bag full of old cheese before he hooked up with Trump.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:41 (seven years ago)
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), 29. november 2017 17:41 (fifty-six seconds ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Roy Moore for instance seems to have taken his cue from Trump.
― Frederik B, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:43 (seven years ago)
roy moore pursued those girls decades ago!
― Mordy, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:46 (seven years ago)
And again, suffering no consequences.
It's not as if Trump's bloviation is going to magically make people racist sexual predators. It's just going to embolden people who already tend toward shittiness by demonstrating that they can maybe get away with letting their id do the driving.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:46 (seven years ago)
ppl may use trump's behavior as an excuse for their own but ime it will be negligible. ppl don't need a poorly behaving president to behave poorly themselves and presidents have done abominable things forever. i don't really buy the "normalization" meme at all.
― Mordy, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:47 (seven years ago)
i don't think too many people take their "moral cues" from trump, not directly at least. i think mordy is right that most people consider themselves better than trump and think his actions are beyond the pale. but that leaves another 100 million americans or so that don't think he's a unredeemable piece of shit. for those people, when he does things like he did this morning, he stretches the bounds of what is permissible behavior.
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:48 (seven years ago)
if you don't believe it, just listen to religious radio in a rural area in the midwest or south. things are getting really fucked up, and the feeling of decline is visceral
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:49 (seven years ago)
He has a whole new legions of fans among Britain First followers and others who think it's OK to murder politicians who are traitors to Britain and the white race.
― Action of Boyle Man Prompts Visitor to Stay (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:51 (seven years ago)
The President of the USA is on our side! God Bless America and pass the ammunition, let's kill another female MP!
― Action of Boyle Man Prompts Visitor to Stay (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:52 (seven years ago)
As a reminder, there have been terrorism cases where RTing extremist propaganda can be the basis for a material support investigation.— emptywheel (@emptywheel) November 29, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:54 (seven years ago)
― Mordy, 29. november 2017 17:46 (six minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
As was the case with Trump and his assaults. I was talking about the way they handled the allegations coming out.
― Frederik B, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:54 (seven years ago)
i promise u donald trump did not invent denial
― Mordy, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:55 (seven years ago)
Cool. So if the only thing Roy Moore had ever done was deny the allegations, then that would be relevant
― Frederik B, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 16:56 (seven years ago)
Refusing to step down, the attacks on the fake news media, the 'whattabout' and 'even if...' It has all been textbook Trump and different from how Todd Akin handled his scandal.
― Frederik B, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:01 (seven years ago)
It's taken less than a year of Prez Trump for people to be all 'come on guys, let's chill, this is just business as usual for the Evil Amerikkkan Empire, just ignore the goof in the White House retweeting hate propaganda, same as it ever was'. It's pretty rad.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:05 (seven years ago)
what would Woodrow Wilson have tweeted
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:06 (seven years ago)
i'm totally worse than obama, except for the bombing
― j., Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:07 (seven years ago)
your bombing was much better
― Evan, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:07 (seven years ago)
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, November 29, 2017 1
I shudder to think!
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:08 (seven years ago)
but Wilson and Nixon would've self-censored. Give Trump credit ("I could shoot somebody on Fifth Avenue") for knowing he doesn't have to.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:11 (seven years ago)
that's true
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:12 (seven years ago)
Let's ask him!
The word always was that Lauer had girls on the side and God help anybody who talked.— Richard M. Nixon (@dick_nixon) November 29, 2017
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:15 (seven years ago)
My mother was even doubling down on the Pochahantas comments, so I cannot wait to hear what she has to say about BF *dies*
― kim jong deal (suzy), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:17 (seven years ago)
It's just going to embolden people who already tend toward shittiness by demonstrating that they can maybe get away with letting their id do the driving.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, November 29, 2017 10:46 AM
The boldness and willingness to be shitty is definitely trickling down and infecting previously mild-mannered people. My mother broke my heart at Thanksgiving last week when she said all those NFL protestors should be thrown in jail. I mean, she's an 85-year-old white southerner, she was already a racist, but she's willing to preach it now.
― WilliamC, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:22 (seven years ago)
Ugh, exactly that. Why hide your hateful feelings like you have something to be ashamed about when the president clearly supports you and people are holding rallies and proudly saying what you're thinking?
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:33 (seven years ago)
posted on Scott Lemieux's site:
Congressional Republicans seem to be falling victim to the same fallacy that Democrats did in 2016, which is assuming that they have a floor among white demographic subsets. Democrats assumed that Obama’s 2012 numbers among HS-educated whites were the floor – that they were so bad that the remaining ones were ideological Dems who voted for a black guy and would be turned off by Trump’s racism. This was wrong.
But I think Republicans are falling for the same thinking now among college educated whites – basically assuming those that didn’t defect to Clinton are ideological conservatives who will vote GOP no matter what. I think 2017 Virginia tends to show this line of thinking is faulty, and Republicans have *way* more ground to lose with college educated whites (a demographic group Trump narrowly carried) than Dems did with HS-educated whites.
People are making the mistake of conflating the base with the pivotal voters – those that get you from 40% to 50% of the national vote. And those pivotal GOP voters aren’t racists in Youngstown (that’s the base!), they’re the couple in their late 40s making 90k in a nice upper middle class suburb. Assuming that those folks’ 2016 vote for Trump was a wholehearted endorsement of his racist and nationalist message is as much of a fallacy as having assumed that the blue collar Macomb County voter who flipped from Bush to Obama in 2008 was making a stand for racial equality.
And the GOP – typically the guardian of suburban values and pocketbook issues for those folks – is currently offering them nothing.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:34 (seven years ago)
"There are a lot of killers. We've got a lot of killers. What, you think our country is so innocent?" an ILXer responded.
― correlated noise of conformity (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:35 (seven years ago)
"voting" won't matter much longer anyways, what with epic gerrymandering, kobachian voter suppression, and international social media Веб-бригады. say hello to the dominionist states of liberteria : )
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:38 (seven years ago)
In re the meanness trickling down, I definitely see that working in local govt., but it's across the spectrum. I don't mean to be all "both sides do it," but it seems to me that people in general on left and right and elsewise are flying off the handle with ad hominem vitriol a lot more easily these days. On the left it's more under the SJW banner, and I do not mean to imply an equivalency between SJWs and white supremacists. But the volume is higher all the way around, and it makes it harder to have reasonable discussions about anything.
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:48 (seven years ago)
And I do think the tone being set by DJT has a lot to do with it.
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:49 (seven years ago)
Britain First retweets are the leading story on the BBC btw.
― Action of Boyle Man Prompts Visitor to Stay (Tom D.), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 17:53 (seven years ago)
NPR unsurprisingly led hourly news with Keillor, followed by Trump-BF.
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 18:07 (seven years ago)
well, yeah. if there's one thing Trump is doing to this country it's teaching people that you don't need standards of proof or sound arguments or facts or anything like that, and that every criticism can be deflected with "FAKE NEWS!" or screeching about Hillary. why spend any brainpower engaging with someone who is not going to comprehend a single word you say?
― frogbs, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 18:49 (seven years ago)
trump isn't an aberration. he's the boss at a shitty job people put up with because they're broke. nothing new here since ronald reagan deconstructed the new deal's / great society's taxation and regulatory protocols, except for maybe the buffoonish blatantness they're rubbing everyone's face in
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 18:53 (seven years ago)
trump is the living embodiment of every racist chain email my dad has sent me since obama took office, and that's all i'll say about it
― ToddBonzalez (BradNelson), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 18:58 (seven years ago)
he's also guilty of quid pro quo with the russian government . . . and may not even be aware that's illegal
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:01 (seven years ago)
April Ryan not invited to WH Xmas party for the first time in 20 years: http://www.theroot.com/april-ryan-not-invited-to-white-house-holiday-party-for-1820841055
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:04 (seven years ago)
Ugh, apparently Ann Coulter was the first person to tweet this BF shit.
― kim jong deal (suzy), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:13 (seven years ago)
She was. She rt'd one video. But the three Trump rt'd were older, which means Coulter's rt lead to Trump scrolling down and down that Britain First person's TL to find them.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:22 (seven years ago)
Ie THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA spent at least ten minutes on this woman's TL.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:23 (seven years ago)
Decent thread:
common thread in many of these bad faith attacks on press are that they seek to exploit public's misunderstanding/ignorance of how we do what we do. for a long time I've thought media's biggest mistake is assuming our audiences understand journalism conventions/how we do our jobs— Wesley Lowery (@WesleyLowery) November 29, 2017
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:25 (seven years ago)
Countdown to Ryan and McConnell expressing their disappointment in the president's RTs, and then Trump pretty much repeating Huckabee's statement and somehow making it worse, lots of pundits vehemently condemning the president's words and actions, fast forward to two weeks from now when Trump has somehow done something even worse and absolutely no one is talking about these videos at all. It's a little predictable at this point, but it's still a fun ride!
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:25 (seven years ago)
P sure this is going to be a line of defense. Is it collusion if you don't even know you're colluding?
― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:30 (seven years ago)
similarly, i expect OrangeApe had an incomplete understanding of Britain First's public profile
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:36 (seven years ago)
Well then I'm sure he'll apologize for the error of having retweeted in ignorance. At the very least, you can be assured that he won't double down or anything.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:38 (seven years ago)
I'm sure he'll apologize for the error
Error77077: does not compute
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:39 (seven years ago)
trying to remember his last apology. did he sort of manage to say the words for the conclusion of the birth certificate thing, just before he made the argument that he was finishing an investigative that clinton started?
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:40 (seven years ago)
^ say the words "i'm sorry" ^ ^ finishing an invstigative investigation ^
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:41 (seven years ago)
Murkowski a yes on taxes, it's gonna pass
Congrats to all my fellow ilxors making 7 figures
― frogbs, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:43 (seven years ago)
who wants to be my roommate? all offers considered
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:46 (seven years ago)
fuck
― horseshoe, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:47 (seven years ago)
It's kind of a horrifying thought experiment to imagine the absolute worst things Trump could accidentally (or 'accidentally') disseminate and what he might say afterwards to justify his actions.
Of course, a year ago I might have used something like 'Trump retweets far right wing snuff videos' as the improbably ott hypothetical scenario around which I constructed such a thought experiment, so I'm kinda uncertain of where to go from here.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:48 (seven years ago)
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, November 29, 2017 2:46 PM (five minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― horseshoe, Wednesday, November 29, 2017 2:47 PM (four minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
That's a good offer but you're supposed to open low.
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:52 (seven years ago)
very good, one in a row
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:54 (seven years ago)
dems should force the republicans to repeal the tax cuts on the rich and make the middle class tax cuts permanent, or no deal on the debt ceiling. fuck it
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:12 (seven years ago)
the GOP doesn't have the votes to pass a debt ceiling raise without the '"freedom" caucus' and/or the democratic minority. play hardball chuck and nancy! either the deficit hawk '"freedom' caucus' votes to add $1.5 trillion to the deficit (and guarantees they'll lose in 2018) or the economy gets it : )
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:16 (seven years ago)
i feel depressed about this tax bill
― marcos, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:18 (seven years ago)
racist islamophobic trump tweets bum me out too but this tax bill seems worse
― marcos, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:19 (seven years ago)
the tax bill will send out much larger and more lasting waves compared to the temporary ripples from an one racist tweet
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:20 (seven years ago)
― sleeve, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:23 (seven years ago)
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:24 (seven years ago)
"is it stealing if you didn't know you couldn't take it" unlikely to hold up in court
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:36 (seven years ago)
vs the hyper-rich unlikely to ever see the inside of a courtroom for long, let alone justice
― Simon H., Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:38 (seven years ago)
Subpoenas are being sent to 23 Trump businesses requiring them to preserve records that may be sought by the attorneys general from the District of Columbia and Maryland in a lawsuit accusing the president of profiting from his office.
U.S. District Judge Peter Messitte on Tuesday issued a two-paragraph order granting the Democratic officials’ request for permission to serve those subpoenas, which don’t call for the immediate production of any information.
DC Attorney General Karl Racine and his Maryland counterpart, Brian Frosh, contend the president’s continued ownership of his business empire -- including the Trump International Hotel in Washington -- enables him to make money from foreign and domestic governments, breaching two Constitutional clauses intended to prevent that.
Attorneys for President Donald Trump have asked the court to toss the emoluments case, arguing the states lack the legal injuries that would give them a right to sue. They also say the Constitution doesn’t cover presidents’ private business activities that are unrelated to their government service. Oral argument is set for Jan. 25.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-11-29/trump-businesses-to-get-retention-subpoenas-in-emoluments-case
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:39 (seven years ago)
Hmm, CNN at least is starting to go there.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/29/politics/president-donald-trump-competency/index.html
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:41 (seven years ago)
it is really insane that we're just gonna pass this thing through without knowing how many tens of millions of dollars Trump himself is going to make from it
― frogbs, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:42 (seven years ago)
asked the court to toss the emoluments case, arguing the states lack the legal injuries that would give them a right to sue.
This is a strange argument. It presumes that the direct constitutional prohibition embodied in the emoluments clause only applies if there is a definable tort, apart from the fact that the president is in breach of his constitutional obligations.
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:45 (seven years ago)
it is really insane that we're just gonna pass this thing through without knowing how many tens of millions of dollars Trump himself is going to make from it― frogbs, Wednesday, November 29, 2017 8:42 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― frogbs, Wednesday, November 29, 2017 8:42 PM (three minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
while we do have an idea about how much his failsons will inherit - 100% of it
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:48 (seven years ago)
this tax bill is 2scoops' revenge that so many people poorer than him are smarter than him (and have better hair)
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:50 (seven years ago)
Apparently the bill has exceptionally bad implications for grad students? A good friend of mine is losing their mind over it.
― Simon H., Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:55 (seven years ago)
yes it does
― sleeve, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:56 (seven years ago)
it's pretty much a total "fuck you" to all of higher education in general
― sleeve, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:57 (seven years ago)
More on that here it appears
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/16/opinion/house-tax-bill-graduate-students.html
― Simon H., Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:57 (seven years ago)
any arguments about this are going to be strange and without precedent tbh. Primarily because restraining the President in these kinds of areas is Congress's job, and they have totally abdicated.
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:58 (seven years ago)
legal policy wonks, please tell me how much of this tax bill disaster can be repealed if we have an all-Dem House/Senate/Prez in 2020
― sleeve, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:58 (seven years ago)
congressional bills can always be repealed/rewritten
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:59 (seven years ago)
The government can pass any laws it wants, Congress can’t pass a tax code that includes “future congresses shall not repeal this tax code”, so unified Democratic government could replace it entirely with an excise tax on whiskey or whatever
― .oO (silby), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:00 (seven years ago)
ty
― sleeve, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:01 (seven years ago)
even more so than currently grad school will be the exclusive domain of children of wealthy families (at the expense of any smarter poorer people). 2scoops is just maybe under orders by former KGB officer vladimir putin to weaken the american higher education system, which has too much clout in the world for the kremlin's liking :(
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:03 (seven years ago)
what's this going to do to medical students?
― akm, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:03 (seven years ago)
fuck them over, like everyone else
taxing tuition remission to fund the repeal of the estate tax is 18th century france bullshit
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:04 (seven years ago)
looking forward to American equivalent of latter days 18th century France tbh
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:06 (seven years ago)
I assume Morbz and I will be fighting over who should be first to the guillotine
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:07 (seven years ago)
yeah it basically fucks people over who are trying to improve their lot in life in exchange for a permanent aristocracy. wheeeeeee
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:07 (seven years ago)
looking forward to American equivalent of latter days 18th century France tbh― Οὖτις, Wednesday, November 29, 2017 9:06 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, November 29, 2017 9:06 PM (one minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
lol dude the mob is getting warmed up right now
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:08 (seven years ago)
perhaps this will usher in a revival of cut-rate barber-surgeons
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:11 (seven years ago)
I'm not, because the people who are currently mobilizing for violence are the racists.
― the Hannah Montana of the Korean War (DJP), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:15 (seven years ago)
yeah, i was gonna say, not quite ready for this right-wing mob with a bunch of guns to heat up
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:17 (seven years ago)
Could we not attribute every evil thing to Russia dude? Trump probably doesn't even know about the grad school thing, he just wants to yell about tax cuts. This is just standard republican viciousness towards college students, ever more hated by their base.
― JoeStork, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:18 (seven years ago)
I think (hope) qualmsley is kidding.
― Simon H., Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:19 (seven years ago)
Sorry, it's a little hard to tell sometimes
― JoeStork, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:19 (seven years ago)
MSNBC had chryon "BREAKING NEWS...Trump: Focused on helping 'people that like me best'". His actual quote was much more benign: 'Our focus is on helping the folks who work in the mailrooms and machine shops of America – the plumbers and the carpenters, the cops and the teachers, the truck drivers and the pipe fitters – the people who like me best.'
Fuck MSNBC. This guy is horrible enough to just let him hang on his own rather than twist his words/take them out of context to make them appear even worse but yeah let's give more fodder to the fakenews idiots.
― A True White Kid that can Jump (Granny Dainger), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:24 (seven years ago)
sheesh can't even make jokes about the French Revolution anymore :(
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:25 (seven years ago)
kidding simon!
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:26 (seven years ago)
but you have to admit . . .
Don't lose your head over this, Shakey.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:27 (seven years ago)
there it is
― Embalming is a flirty business (DJP), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:28 (seven years ago)
About right
WH staff has given up on the idea of stopping the president from tweeting, I'm told. On retweeting of anti-Muslim videos and other offensive posts, WH aides will say "well the issue has been raised" and try to make the most of it, I'm told.— Jim Acosta (@Acosta) November 29, 2017
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:53 (seven years ago)
what else have they given up on
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:54 (seven years ago)
not letting america slide into civil war
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 21:59 (seven years ago)
GeneralKellyHoldingHead.jpg
― A is for (Aimless), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 22:00 (seven years ago)
in-house drug testing
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 22:07 (seven years ago)
propecia can do a number on someone
― reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 22:28 (seven years ago)
anyway how do I provide material support to some leftist violence
― .oO (silby), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 22:36 (seven years ago)
asking for a friend
british cabinet (i.e. government leadership)
So POTUS has endorsed the views of a vile, hate-filled racist organisation that hates me and people like me. He is wrong and I refuse to let it go and say nothing— Sajid Javid (@sajidjavid) November 29, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 22:36 (seven years ago)
https://www.buzzfeed.com/amphtml/danvergano/kellyanne-conway-is-opioids-czarwhy because she look intersting
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 22:47 (seven years ago)
Can't believe two huge Ayn Rand fans could fall out like this. xp
― nashwan, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 22:47 (seven years ago)
Shut down the government. Call it "Remind Everyone of All the Important Shit The Government Does For Them Every Day That the GOP Wants to Take Away Day."
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 23:15 (seven years ago)
creepy development
Across the government, acting directors who were installed without Senate approval are quietly dropping the “acting” title from their name, suggesting they have every intention of overstaying their legal welcome.The Federal Vacancies Reform Act (FVRA) allows the president to install an acting leader of any federal agency or office where there is a vacancy. In the case of the CFPB, the debate is about whether the statute applies to the agency, whose specific line of succession would make Leandra English, the hand-picked deputy director, the acting director....Trade publication Energy & Environment News highlighted this issue in a small story earlier this week. Reporter Hannah Northey cited several cases of acting heads installed under the FVRA dropping their “acting” titles in the past month — while still controlling policy at their respective agencies.Dan Simmons, an expat of the American Legislative Exchange Council, has been presiding over the Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. The Trump administration has not named a nominee for the Senate-confirmed position, and Simmons hit his 210-day time limit on November 16. The Department of Energy subsequently removed Simmons’s title of acting director, while stating he would still “serve in a leadership capacity” as a principal deputy assistant secretary. Simmons signed off on a proposal to overhaul energy efficiency standards the next day.In other words, the Trump administration designated and then un-designated the acting director, ostensibly to comply with the letter of the law while violating its spirit. By keeping the leadership in place without the technical “acting director” title, they have circumvented the requirement for Senate advice and consent.The Trump administration has also made such moves at the Office of Nuclear Energy, where former acting director Edward McGinnis is currently the principal deputy assistant secretary, and at the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, where former acting director Eric Rolfing is now listed as deputy director.
The Federal Vacancies Reform Act (FVRA) allows the president to install an acting leader of any federal agency or office where there is a vacancy. In the case of the CFPB, the debate is about whether the statute applies to the agency, whose specific line of succession would make Leandra English, the hand-picked deputy director, the acting director.
Trade publication Energy & Environment News highlighted this issue in a small story earlier this week. Reporter Hannah Northey cited several cases of acting heads installed under the FVRA dropping their “acting” titles in the past month — while still controlling policy at their respective agencies.
Dan Simmons, an expat of the American Legislative Exchange Council, has been presiding over the Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. The Trump administration has not named a nominee for the Senate-confirmed position, and Simmons hit his 210-day time limit on November 16. The Department of Energy subsequently removed Simmons’s title of acting director, while stating he would still “serve in a leadership capacity” as a principal deputy assistant secretary. Simmons signed off on a proposal to overhaul energy efficiency standards the next day.
In other words, the Trump administration designated and then un-designated the acting director, ostensibly to comply with the letter of the law while violating its spirit. By keeping the leadership in place without the technical “acting director” title, they have circumvented the requirement for Senate advice and consent.
The Trump administration has also made such moves at the Office of Nuclear Energy, where former acting director Edward McGinnis is currently the principal deputy assistant secretary, and at the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, where former acting director Eric Rolfing is now listed as deputy director.
https://theintercept.com/2017/11/29/trump-administration-acting-director-cfpb-mick-mulvaney/
― Karl Malone, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 23:22 (seven years ago)
well I'm glad I've already had the internal "stay or go" debate and have decided to fight to the death here in the US, see y'all in the internment camps
― sleeve, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 23:25 (seven years ago)
the independent country of Manhattan welcomes you
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 23:29 (seven years ago)
I'm not sure I have any real expectation of surviving Trump's presidency. If nothing else, this level of persistent stress doesn't exactly lend itself to longevity.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 29 November 2017 23:34 (seven years ago)
saw some news blurb about birth rates plummeting.. aside from being completely unable to afford a child, why the fuck would I want to bring one into this hellscape we call the usa?
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 30 November 2017 00:01 (seven years ago)
we should create a separate nihilism thread for u guys imo
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 00:03 (seven years ago)
like, the endless stream of it (while occasionally funny) is not really about politics
here you go
Nihilism: C/D
― sleeve, Thursday, 30 November 2017 00:04 (seven years ago)
Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team has postponed an anticipated grand jury testimony linked to his investigation into Michael Flynn amid growing indications of possible plea deal discussions.
https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/29/politics/special-counsel-michael-flynn/index.html
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 30 November 2017 00:17 (seven years ago)
https://thinkprogress.org/moore-study-course-vison-forum-135402ed8816/
― Frederik B, Thursday, 30 November 2017 00:32 (seven years ago)
this fucking idiot just tried to @ theresamay and tagged the wrong account. jfc.
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 30 November 2017 00:53 (seven years ago)
@realDonaldTrump.@Theresa_May, don’t focus on me, focus on the destructive Radical Islamic Terrorism that is taking place within the United Kingdom. We are doing just fine!
Honestly no idea if I'd prefer May to @ back or not.
― nashwan, Thursday, 30 November 2017 01:17 (seven years ago)
I think I’ve found a tiny upside to Trump: Aaron Sorkin is incapable of writing dialogue or drama incorporating him
Sorkin says Trump holds no appeal for him, fictional or otherwise: "Trump is exactly what he looks like: a really dumb guy with an observable psychiatric disorder" https://t.co/D192wZJK3c pic.twitter.com/YeNltuFY4R— Hollywood Reporter (@THR) November 29, 2017
― mh, Thursday, 30 November 2017 01:35 (seven years ago)
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, November 29, 2017 6:03 PM (one hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, November 29, 2017 6:03 PM (one hour ago)
say what you will about nihilism, at least it's not an ethos
― j., Thursday, 30 November 2017 01:47 (seven years ago)
If the electoral tide doesn't shift in 2018, let alone a couple of weeks from now, then I don't think I can take another year of this shit. Because if it doesn't shift, it's only going to get worse and worse.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 30 November 2017 02:15 (seven years ago)
Meantime, but of course
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/womans-effort-to-infiltrate-the-washington-post-dates-back-months/2017/11/29/ce95e01a-d51e-11e7-b62d-d9345ced896d_story.html?tid=ss_tw-bottom&utm_term=.5b0a72b8d7eb
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 30 November 2017 03:03 (seven years ago)
There once was a New York man home-grown"Lock her up" he often would intoneHe might wind up browsingthrough some federal housingin a jumpsuit that matches his skin tone
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 30 November 2017 04:05 (seven years ago)
I like to think I can tolerate enormous amounts of pain and toxicity but if I add up all the channels of information I’ve had to cut out of my life since the election, it’s actually bad out here, folks.and I should fucking know, I used to breathe the lies during Dubya’s first term.
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 30 November 2017 04:15 (seven years ago)
it is bad out there
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 30 November 2017 04:18 (seven years ago)
I just want to read about STARDEW INFINITY: JEDI AVENGERS: THE LAST VALLEY feat. BARACK OBAMA #TBT
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 30 November 2017 04:21 (seven years ago)
Trump's success is anathema to the way he writes politicians / political battles so this makes perfect sense
― Simon H., Thursday, 30 November 2017 04:22 (seven years ago)
I am a veteran and a career civil servant and I literally can’t with this, right now, sometimes I bet McMaster has surprise puke moments during the day
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 30 November 2017 04:24 (seven years ago)
Probably someone made this point today, but obvious question for Huckabee's daughter (who I realize has a job that requires she spout nonsense...and chooses to do so): what would your reaction be if I made a fake video tomorrow of 30 schoolkids getting gunned down by a guy in fatigues and armed to the hilt, which I then posted on Twitter to make the case for gun control? That threat is real too.
― clemenza, Thursday, 30 November 2017 04:51 (seven years ago)
Yeah, okay. Yeah. I'm peace-ing out on this thread and also the news in general for a while. I'm grinding my teeth to nubs and drinking so I can calm down enough to sleep. Something's gotta give, and I need to make sure that 'something' isn't a blood vessel in my brain. Keep fightin' the good fight, y'all.
― Ripped Taylor (Old Lunch), Thursday, 30 November 2017 05:20 (seven years ago)
this entire tax thing--the process, the policy, all of it--is completely insane, will be a disaster, and has nothing to do with Trump. This would be happening under President Rubio.— slackbot (@pareene) November 29, 2017
― ice cream social justice (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 30 November 2017 06:44 (seven years ago)
If he literally spat in her face she'd stand their with her weird frozen grin thank him for it. The good news is he's managed to make this the leading story in the British media for the second day in a row and re-started the debate on cancelling a state visit by a US President for, as far as I know, the first time ever.
― Action of Boyle Man Prompts Visitor to Stay (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 November 2017 08:38 (seven years ago)
I feel bad for the random @theresamay with six followers who's probably getting a fuckload of abusive shit right now, although I guess she has done for a while. I feel worse for wishing he'd accidentally tweeted at the porn star instead.
The weakest PM that Britain has known in decades is not going to get in a fight with President no matter how much shit he throws at her. But it's a good reminder that she can expect absolutely fuck all from the US and that everyone in her party should stop maintaining the fantasy that we will.
Given one of their own MPs was literally murdered in the street by a Britain First supporter there's no way that even the most craven Opposition MP could fail to oppose his visit, right?
― Matt DC, Thursday, 30 November 2017 08:57 (seven years ago)
But it's a good reminder that she can expect absolutely fuck all from the US and that everyone in her party should stop maintaining the fantasy that we will.
You'd think we'd have got the message about that in the UK by now after the entire history of relations between the two countries.
― Action of Boyle Man Prompts Visitor to Stay (Tom D.), Thursday, 30 November 2017 09:00 (seven years ago)
The grander the state visit the better. Roll out the golden carriages. Remind the country how absolutely craven we are and that we have, against the odds, managed to find a way to make ourselves even weaker wrt the US than we have been since WWII.
Sajid Javid and Nadhim Zahwahi, both active members of a government that is, in some respects, even more racist can gtfo with their Strongly Worded Condemnations tbh.
― Wag1 Shree Rajneesh (ShariVari), Thursday, 30 November 2017 09:28 (seven years ago)
Nazi sympathizer profiled by the New York Times says he lost his job and — soon — his home https://t.co/Jf9pmrFqWR— Washington Post (@washingtonpost) November 30, 2017
Good morning!
― Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 30 November 2017 13:33 (seven years ago)
you have 10 and a half hours to come up with a new title!
― imago, Thursday, 30 November 2017 13:38 (seven years ago)
i guess 15 and a half if we're going with EST
US Politics December 2017
― crüt, Thursday, 30 November 2017 13:40 (seven years ago)
https://www.vox.com/2017/11/30/16517022/impeachment-donald-trump
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 30 November 2017 13:42 (seven years ago)
May’s gotta tell Trump to fuck off in this situation. The only move.
― New Jersey (treeship 2), Thursday, 30 November 2017 13:44 (seven years ago)
has Ezra spoken up about the #VoxUnion yet
― Simon H., Thursday, 30 November 2017 13:44 (seven years ago)
good mourning!
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 30 November 2017 13:48 (seven years ago)
I, for one, think this thread has benefited from the absence of Trump.
― Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 30 November 2017 13:51 (seven years ago)
it's cute when people like Klein ponder how they can fix the US constitution when the reality is more akin it being Not Even Wrong.
― another day another dolour (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 November 2017 13:53 (seven years ago)
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 November 2017 14:02 (seven years ago)
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 November 2017 14:03 (seven years ago)
Amerikansk Politik Desember 2017 (ToTusindogSytten)
― Frederik B, Thursday, 30 November 2017 14:04 (seven years ago)
There are some decent candidates in here:https://www.balloon-juice.com/2017/11/29/open-thread-how-bad-is-trumps-brain/I nominate “a handful of conspiracy theories that have no grounding in fact: US Politics, December 2017”
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 30 November 2017 14:23 (seven years ago)
I don't really get why anyone pays attention to Trump's tweets tbh, he's just trolling the opposition/riling up his fanbase. outside of the legal ramifications (which are all, generally speaking bad for him) seems like the wiser course of action is to ignore them.― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 29 November 2017 Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
If anyone on here approvingly posted any content from a far-right org I reckon they'd be rightly banned.
I suppose the reason twitter won't ban is because of this dumb 'ignore' type stuff.
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 30 November 2017 14:53 (seven years ago)
can't stifle freedom of the press, Twitter is a website of record
― another day another dolour (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 November 2017 14:55 (seven years ago)
A record of our hell.
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 30 November 2017 14:56 (seven years ago)
imagine a world where people had to host and publicize their own hateful propaganda
― another day another dolour (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 November 2017 14:57 (seven years ago)
US politics december 2017: when they go low, we go home
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 30 November 2017 14:59 (seven years ago)
Tillerson getting the shove; Mike Pompeo to become the new Tillerson; Tom Cotton to be the new Pompeo
Mr. Tillerson’s departure has been widely anticipated for months, but associates have said he was intent on finishing out the year to retain whatever dignity he could. Even so, an end-of-year exit would make his time in office the shortest of any secretary of state whose tenure was not ended by a change in presidents in nearly 120 years.
― grawlix (unperson), Thursday, 30 November 2017 14:59 (seven years ago)
what in the hell
it's like the same six people are gonna end up running ten departments each
― sleeve, Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:01 (seven years ago)
efficiency!
― another day another dolour (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:03 (seven years ago)
Mr. Tillerson’s departure has been widely anticipated for months, but associates have said he was intent on finishing out the year to retain whatever dignity he could.
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:08 (seven years ago)
Cotton in charge of the CIA, just fantastic. Well, at least he can write full sentences. There’s that.
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:11 (seven years ago)
i loved the 'your favorite president (me)' from a couple days ago
― global tetrahedron, Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:15 (seven years ago)
Cotton will now have the resume of the hero of a shitty action book series
― President Keyes, Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:16 (seven years ago)
i notice trump has moved On from random Capitalisation to UPPERCASE YELLING over the last DAY OR SO
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:18 (seven years ago)
only a matter of time before he transcends language altogether and just tweets links to isis execution footage with angry face emojis
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:20 (seven years ago)
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/000/515/215/2a9.png
― crüt, Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:23 (seven years ago)
I’m surprised he hasn’t started forwarding racist email chains to the entire country yet. I guess there’s always 2018
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:23 (seven years ago)
Maybe he'll shift to Facebook and post anti-Hillary/Obama image macros complete with minions. Then he'll go to Walmart and hold up lines at the register because he's trying to coerce the cashier into agreeing with him about the invasion of sharia law.
― Evan, Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:31 (seven years ago)
“US Politics, December 2017: I guess there’s always 2018”
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:33 (seven years ago)
― sleeve, Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:35 (seven years ago)
sheesh can't even make jokes about the French Revolution anymore
"Let them eat steak (well done and with ketchup)!"
Josh, sorry but that's been said about every shutdown threat so far, and no one has yet given even the tiniest of fucks. People keep driving on interstates and flying on airplanes and getting SS checks. Food keeps getting inspected. The Army doesn't take a break.
No one notices the absence of the huge number of important-but-nonessential things done by the CDC or EPA or Fish & Wildlife or NLRB or GSA or whatever. It would take a long time to feel those hurts, and anyway the point of having most of those functions is not averting immediate catastrophe, but building a more just and safe and civil society bit by bit, on a time scale of decades rather than days.
― here come the warm jorts (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:37 (seven years ago)
I got a parking ticket in DC during a government shutdown. A handful of people will find they can't follow through on a planned visit to a national park. So they'll either go later or go somewhere else instead. Big deal; in any case the number of people so affected could be counted on the fingers of one severely maimed hand.
― here come the warm jorts (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:39 (seven years ago)
Twitter won't ban him (as they should - he's violated their terms of service many times over by now) because he makes them money.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:50 (seven years ago)
I would think this is blatantly obvious - what better brand awareness promoter could you have than the president
it's the same reason they won't crackdown on propaganda bots, cause if they start removing bots, their active user count will drop by millions
― voodoo chili, Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:54 (seven years ago)
exactly
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 15:55 (seven years ago)
This just pooped up on my Facebook feed (I was going to fix that typo, but nah) from a friend of a friend. I'll just leave it here for posterity:
IM SEEING POSTS WHERE SOME ARE PUTTING TRUMP DOWN, FOR THINGS HE DOES , BUT THEY NEVER NAME WHAT HE DOES EXCEPT MAYBE HIS TWEETING, HOW IS THAT HURTING THIS COUNTRY ? AND MOST ARE SO IGNORANT THEY DONT REALIZE THEY ARE BEING PLAYED BY THE POLITICIANS, SANCTUARY CITIES AND OPEN BORDERS ARE WHAT KEEPS ALL THESE DEMOCRAT MAYORS AND GOVERNORS IN POWER , THEY VOTE DEMOCRAT, THESE DEMOCRATS ARE A DIFFERENT BREED, THEY ARE NOT THE DEMOCRATS OF A FEW DECADES AGO, THEY HAVE MORPHED INTO A BUNCH OF RADICAL THUGS, WITH ONE GOAL, TO OVER THROW TRUMP AND TURN AMERICA INTO A SOCIALIST COUNTRY .
― the young, low level volunteer named (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 30 November 2017 16:00 (seven years ago)
It’s a fair cop.
― .oO (silby), Thursday, 30 November 2017 16:02 (seven years ago)
― President Keyes, Thursday, 30 November 2017 16:03 (seven years ago)
I’m down with that goal but it sounds like two goals actually
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 30 November 2017 16:04 (seven years ago)
you know what, forget it. maybe both sides are bad. the DNC sure wasn't as fair to their independent as the RNC / kremlin was to theirs. and now the democrats are obstructing mr. trump, who may not be the best speaker in the world, fine, at least he's no soviet, i mean, socialist. burp
― reggie (qualmsley), Thursday, 30 November 2017 16:09 (seven years ago)
McCain is in, the tax bill is a sure thing now
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DP5EshPXUAAkLqz.jpg:large
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 16:11 (seven years ago)
depressing
― marcos, Thursday, 30 November 2017 16:13 (seven years ago)
― sleeve, Thursday, 30 November 2017 16:14 (seven years ago)
hey, what was the purpose of the individual mandate anyway? it must not be important! let's just toss it out, see what happens.
let's shake things up, america, keep it fresh for 2018
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 30 November 2017 16:14 (seven years ago)
haha this is fucking great
https://twitter.com/twitter/statuses/936080955185487880
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 16:14 (seven years ago)
midterms are going to rule so hard
― j., Thursday, 30 November 2017 16:52 (seven years ago)
maybe
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 16:53 (seven years ago)
fingers crossed
it does look like a bloodbath is possible
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 16:54 (seven years ago)
jeez i fuckin hope so
dem leadership is utterly depressing imo
― marcos, Thursday, 30 November 2017 16:56 (seven years ago)
Dem leadership is doing a p remarkable job under the circumstances imo, the caucus has held together
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:06 (seven years ago)
is this tax bill passing going to be good or bad for Republicans come 2018? I mean the bill is massively unpopular but how the hell could the GOP rally their base having accomplished nothing despite total control?
― frogbs, Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:06 (seven years ago)
good for their base, but everyone else hates it and will likely be energized at the polls
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:07 (seven years ago)
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:14 (seven years ago)
mark cuban
― Karl Malone, Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:17 (seven years ago)
BREAKING: Texas Republican Rep. Joe Barton says he will not seek re-election after nude photo of him was posted on social media.— The Associated Press (@AP) November 30, 2017
― Le Bateau Ivre, Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:17 (seven years ago)
thank fucking god. i HATE joe barton
yesterday they were running a story about how some other sext buddy (or unwilling sextee?) of his, from when he was married, popped up and insisted that he resign
― j., Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:18 (seven years ago)
Falconer: Stop taking naked pictures of yourself dipshit!Falcon: WHAT?
― Chocolate-covered gummy bears? Not ruling those lil' guys out. (ulysses), Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:19 (seven years ago)
p erudite zing, ulysses
― here come the warm jorts (Ye Mad Puffin), Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:21 (seven years ago)
zings fall apart
― rob, Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:27 (seven years ago)
that michigan AG ad is absolutely amazing
Yeah, as mentioned above, wasn’t some twitter exec overheard talking about how the guy on there alone is worth like $2billion In market cap?
It’s a really choice depiction of Silicon Valley in action, isnt it? As long as your usage numbers look good enough to your VC to just keep getting funding, nevermind the amount of actual users. I wouldn’t mind the extreme grift except that enough media people are intoxicated with shiny new cool tech/money/power, so the shared ideological myths bleed into other parts of the culture(like say political leaders). Cult of Success & all that
― Google Murray Blockchain (kingfish), Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:41 (seven years ago)
What would happen if (when?) he tweets a racial slur?
― Evan, Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:49 (seven years ago)
nothing
― sleeve, Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:50 (seven years ago)
nothinghe just posted a snuff video and nothing happened he could post a video of him beheading a baby and nothing would happen
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:51 (seven years ago)
can we talk about how shitty john conyers' lawyer's statements have been? so bad in fact that its whats motivated pelosi to show him the fucking door?
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:52 (seven years ago)
Maybe but half of the conversation on the twitter thread is how its fucked. I don't remember reading that it has ever made a profit.
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:56 (seven years ago)
I've already had lunch, so here's an image for y'all to ponder during yours:
The bucket containing Trump's brain sits on a modified t-shirt cannon. It's pushed on stage, then starts shooting turds into the gleeful MAGA crowd.— Mat Johnson (@mat_johnson) November 30, 2017
― grawlix (unperson), Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:56 (seven years ago)
Maybe Trump could nationalise it in his 2nd term. xp
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:57 (seven years ago)
surprised he hasn’t started forwarding racist email chains to the entire country yet. I guess there’s always 2018he would definitely be doing this all day long if he had / knew how to use email
― shackling the masses with plastic-wrapped snack picks (sic), Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:58 (seven years ago)
Hmmmm. Republicans think people will come around to their tax plan...
In pushing so hard, Republicans are betting they can sell this plan to the skeptical public once the legislation is signed into law by President Trump and workers see a boost in take-home pay. They are not dismissive of the polling, but they believe they can make the legislation popular enough next year to save their congressional majorities in the midterm elections. ...Republicans can take some solace in that groundswell of ACA support, showing how the public can warm up to previously unpopular laws. The question for Republicans is whether, if they pass their tax plan, they can convince the public that it was a good thing to do in time for next year’s elections...Ryan is adamant that, once the bill is signed into law, voters will like what they see.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/despite-skeptical-public-gop-pushing-ahead-on-tax-cut-plan/2017/11/25/d81ddd7c-d145-11e7-81bc-c55a220c8cbe_story.html?utm_term=.b0983e8236ae
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 30 November 2017 17:59 (seven years ago)
Why would an empty bucket affect the functionality of a t-shirt cannon?
― Evan, Thursday, 30 November 2017 18:03 (seven years ago)
workers see a boost in take-home pay
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 November 2017 18:03 (seven years ago)
and workers see a boost in take-home pay.
by all accounts (except GOP's obv).... this won't actually happen for most people
― marcos, Thursday, 30 November 2017 18:03 (seven years ago)
lol bizarro otm
Republicans can take some solace in that groundswell of ACA support, showing how the public can warm up to previously unpopular laws.
lol except that the ACA provides something and this tax bill is taking away something
― marcos, Thursday, 30 November 2017 18:04 (seven years ago)
Hmmmm. Republicans think people will come around to their tax plan...In pushing so hard, Republicans are betting they can sell this plan to the skeptical public once the legislation is signed into law by President Trump and workers see a boost in take-home pay. They are not dismissive of the polling, but they believe they can make the legislation popular enough next year to save their congressional majorities in the midterm elections. ...Republicans can take some solace in that groundswell of ACA support, showing how the public can warm up to previously unpopular laws. The question for Republicans is whether, if they pass their tax plan, they can convince the public that it was a good thing to do in time for next year’s elections...Ryan is adamant that, once the bill is signed into law, voters will like what they see.https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/despite-skeptical-public-gop-pushing-ahead-on-tax-cut-plan/2017/11/25/d81ddd7c-d145-11e7-81bc-c55a220c8cbe_story.html?utm_term=.b0983e8236ae― curmudgeon, Thursday, November 30, 2017 5:59 PM (eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― curmudgeon, Thursday, November 30, 2017 5:59 PM (eight minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
nobody can go back as for as 2004 to see this shit never happened and all the corporations did was stock buybacks and increase dividends for shareholders
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Thursday, 30 November 2017 18:08 (seven years ago)
yeah wasn’t there a story last week about some cabinet member asking a room full of ceos how many of them would be reinvesting their tax breaks to create jobs and was answered by the sound of quietly shuffling feet and a couple of muffled coughs
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 November 2017 18:17 (seven years ago)
Just had breakfast with a few business owners. They both said if tax bill passes they will hire 20-30 new people as soon as the new year starts Let's get this thing passed, Senate!— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) November 30, 2017
― Monster fatberg (Phil D.), Thursday, 30 November 2017 18:20 (seven years ago)
wow that’s like 90 new jobs, my skepticism has evaporated
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 November 2017 18:21 (seven years ago)
Lol we are already essentially at full employment
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 30 November 2017 18:25 (seven years ago)
nowhere to go but down
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 November 2017 18:26 (seven years ago)
so, this Tillerson exit strategy was hatched by ... Kelly? I thought Kelly and Tillerson and Mattis had a "suicide pact" lol
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 18:26 (seven years ago)
clearly more of a murder-suicide deal
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 November 2017 18:28 (seven years ago)
First, you pass the law, so it is a done deal. Then you sell it to the public by claiming that it will bring them amazing future benefits. Because the future cannot be inspected to verify or falsify the claims, the media will dutifully report your claims, since these are the only reportable facts in sight. People will take sides on the veracity of the claims, according to their tribal identity.
By the time the future arrives and the claims can be verified or falsified, not only will the public be accustomed to the law, but the falsity of claims made years earlier in support of what is now a settled matter will not be considered news and will not be discussed in the media.
As a basic strategy it sure seems like it could work.
― A is for (Aimless), Thursday, 30 November 2017 18:32 (seven years ago)
Gotta try this thing of referring to "a few" of something and then immediately clarifying that I mean just two in the next sentence.
― nashwan, Thursday, 30 November 2017 18:36 (seven years ago)
Just like with every recent war or tax cut, it's not like the GOP are going to have to clean it up. They screw up get out of power, then the Democrats cut the ugly no win legislation to duct tape a fix and then get blamed for causing the problem in the first place and two years later the GOP are back in power.
― earlnash, Thursday, 30 November 2017 18:41 (seven years ago)
this pattern is woefully well established
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 18:56 (seven years ago)
last Dem fix for the war effort was a duct taped roll of $700 billion gifted to hater in chief
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 30 November 2017 19:00 (seven years ago)
huh, that's odd
In the latest POLITICO/Morning Consult tracking poll out this week, just 36 percent of voters overall said they support the GOP plan. Among Republican voters, support dropped to 59 percent from 66 percent, suggesting Democrats are having some success with their attacks that the bill is strongly tilted to corporations and the wealthy.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 19:40 (seven years ago)
(the drop in GOP support, that is)
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 19:41 (seven years ago)
it will make no difference
― global tetrahedron, Thursday, 30 November 2017 20:10 (seven years ago)
I don't think so either, it's just weird
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 20:16 (seven years ago)
Their plan is that everyone gets a taxcut in the first year, and then everything except tax cuts for the richest is phased out. So in 2018, people get money, get excited and vote for GOP in midterms, then after that they're screwed.
― Frederik B, Thursday, 30 November 2017 20:28 (seven years ago)
Phases out in 2026 right?
― dan selzer, Thursday, 30 November 2017 20:33 (seven years ago)
the stuff for individuals phases out; corporate changes are permanent
― curmudgeon, Thursday, 30 November 2017 20:47 (seven years ago)
this thread makes me look forward to dying
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Thursday, 30 November 2017 20:48 (seven years ago)
right, I meant the individual stuff, comment before seemed to imply it would be right after 2018
― dan selzer, Thursday, 30 November 2017 20:51 (seven years ago)
it's not this simple
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 21:00 (seven years ago)
my taxes - like those of others in NY, etc. - will go up without the state/local tax deduction, for example.
other people in other states will get screwed in different ways, since their overall rate might be lowered but that won't necessarily make up for the loss from various deductions
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 21:01 (seven years ago)
the monstrosity lumbers on
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2017/11/30/trump-to-cut-bears-ears-national-monument-by-85-percent-grand-staircase-escalante-by-half-documents-show/?utm_term=.f9a96416146b
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 21:07 (seven years ago)
also, surprise!
Breaking: Congress’ nonpartisan tax analysts have concluded the Senate Republicans’ tax plan would add $1 trillion to the deficit over 10 years, contradicting White House promises the bill would pay for itself and complicating GOP leaders’ efforts to find the support they need to pass the bill through a closely divided Senate.
Republicans’ massive tax overhaul steamed toward passage in the Senate Thursday, picking up key support from Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) as the number of holdouts narrowed.
A few issues remained unresolved, most critically a “trigger” sought by Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) to raise taxes if growth estimates aren’t met. But GOP leaders projected optimism about passing the $1.5 trillion legislation through the Senate on Thursday evening or Friday, a major step forward as President Trump and GOP leaders seek to overhaul the U.S. tax code for the first time in three decades.
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 21:10 (seven years ago)
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Thursday, 30 November 2017 21:50 (seven years ago)
In the latest POLITICO/Morning Consult tracking poll out this week, just 36 percent of voters overall said they support the GOP plan.
So it's almost twice as popular as ACA repeal! No wonder it's passing.
― Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 30 November 2017 22:25 (seven years ago)
i'd be eternally honored xpost
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Thursday, 30 November 2017 22:27 (seven years ago)
I just glanced at the first part of that WaPo url, read "Trump to cut bears' ears," and just figured, huh, well yeah, he would do that...
― the young, low level volunteer named (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 30 November 2017 22:52 (seven years ago)
Is there a Bear Palin?
― nashwan, Thursday, 30 November 2017 23:28 (seven years ago)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/2017/11/30/c2118302-d5e7-11e7-a986-d0a9770d9a3e_story.htmlThe Republican plan for a massive tax overhaul slammed into late-stage drama on Thursday as party leaders scrambled to prevent several members from derailing the entire effort.The tension played out during a tense 62-minute standoff on the Senate floor, as Sens. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisc.) refused to vote with their colleagues until they had assurances that more changes could be made to the bill.Corker and Flake had just been informed that their proposed “trigger,” a mechanism to raise taxes if economic growth came in slower than projected, would not be allowed by the Senate’s parliamentarian....The competing demands sent GOP leaders scrambling. They control just 52 votes in the 100-seat chamber, and they can’t afford to lose three Republicans if they want the bill to pass. After Corker, Flake, and Johnson agreed to let the debate proceed, GOP leaders conceded that numerous changes were now under consideration.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 30 November 2017 23:32 (seven years ago)
dragging out the inevitable, most likely
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 23:35 (seven years ago)
for sure but it is amazing how bad they are at this
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 30 November 2017 23:46 (seven years ago)
you mean governing?
― cosmic brain dildo (Sparkle Motion), Thursday, 30 November 2017 23:50 (seven years ago)
being humans
― Οὖτις, Thursday, 30 November 2017 23:58 (seven years ago)
Chuck Todd said they have to prove they're good at governing, see.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 30 November 2017 23:59 (seven years ago)
read that post in the voice of Edward G. Robinson
― Οὖτις, Friday, 1 December 2017 00:00 (seven years ago)
It's a bad idea for Senate Dems -- not all of them -- to insist that this thing will Blow Up the Deficit. We know what's coming. When the deficit blows up, Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, and the tired wretched bodies of the poor are next -- if any rubble is left standing when this excrescence is signed.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 December 2017 00:00 (seven years ago)
yeah the deficit stuff is all basically a weak dodge, the better argument is "the rich get all your money, you get nothing"
― Οὖτις, Friday, 1 December 2017 00:02 (seven years ago)
Being humans? They’re not even good at being boring white guys in suits
― El Tomboto, Friday, 1 December 2017 00:03 (seven years ago)
I really don't get why dems are constantly wringing their hands over the deficit. They got burned by that line of thinking repeatedly under Obama, and it looks like they still haven't learned anything.
― Moodles, Friday, 1 December 2017 00:11 (seven years ago)
Donors
― El Tomboto, Friday, 1 December 2017 00:13 (seven years ago)
Deficits dont matter
― Οὖτις, Friday, 1 December 2017 00:13 (seven years ago)
we poors are still really bad at class warfare you know.
― correlated noise of conformity (Hunt3r), Friday, 1 December 2017 00:36 (seven years ago)
― Οὖτις, Thursday, November 30, 2017 7:13 PM
Cheney's only truth.
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 December 2017 00:37 (seven years ago)
(and to those making this policy, 99.5% of us are poors) xp
― correlated noise of conformity (Hunt3r), Friday, 1 December 2017 00:37 (seven years ago)
Badass comment by defense attorney after his undocumented client is acquitted in murder case Trump and Sessions used to drum up xenophobia. pic.twitter.com/UXr7GoKe80— David Menschel (@davidminpdx) December 1, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 1 December 2017 01:31 (seven years ago)
Matt Gonzalez rules
― reggae mike love (polyphonic), Friday, 1 December 2017 01:48 (seven years ago)
The National Tree Lighting ceremony was beautiful this evening - but hard not to notice the empty seats. #Christmas #DMV #USA pic.twitter.com/oKMrnnBekG— Steve Rudin ABC7 (@SteveRudinABC7) November 30, 2017
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Friday, 1 December 2017 01:50 (seven years ago)
US politics december 2017: the may themselves soon avail themselves
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 1 December 2017 02:02 (seven years ago)
there's a new Labour video kicking around that just nails the right tone and message re class war
― Simon H., Friday, 1 December 2017 02:04 (seven years ago)
When bankers like Morgan Stanley say we’re a threat, they’re right.The next Labour Government is a threat to a damaging and failed system that’s rigged for the few. pic.twitter.com/v1ujMkngdv— Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn) November 30, 2017
― Simon H., Friday, 1 December 2017 02:05 (seven years ago)
Can you brits loan the Democratic party here some Corbynism of the above variety? We're a bit short right now. We'll pay you back after November 2018, we swear.
― A is for (Aimless), Friday, 1 December 2017 02:35 (seven years ago)
Oh shit didnt even realize that was Gonzalez!
I wanted him to be mayor so bad.
― Οὖτις, Friday, 1 December 2017 02:39 (seven years ago)
Tax bill vote cancelled for now
― Οὖτις, Friday, 1 December 2017 02:43 (seven years ago)
People are saying it was the biggest tree lighting ceremony ever.
― attention vampire (MatthewK), Friday, 1 December 2017 02:45 (seven years ago)
We're down to the nut-cutting
― Οὖτις, Friday, 1 December 2017 02:45 (seven years ago)
Every obstacle to passage helps. If one senator gets their goodie inserted, maybe another one will object and pout.
― A is for (Aimless), Friday, 1 December 2017 02:46 (seven years ago)
Seems like that's what's happening, yes
― Οὖτις, Friday, 1 December 2017 02:55 (seven years ago)
maybe if trump / mcconnell / ryan retroactively tax the tuition remissions of everyone's MAs and PhDs etc going back to the good old days (enron's bankruptcy) that will help out fiscally conservative deficit hawk republicans trying to meet reconciliation parameters
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 1 December 2017 03:08 (seven years ago)
For the many not the new is so simple even the dnc could fuck it up
― officer sonny bonds, lytton pd (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 1 December 2017 03:14 (seven years ago)
taxes go up on the middle class so that trumpkins / kochs / waltons can enjoy their eight figure inheritances tax free. let them eat hannity
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 1 December 2017 03:32 (seven years ago)
They take from the medium poor toGive to the needy poorVia the government poorGive it to the poor poorThey're knocking on my doorEntranceEntranced
Stick it in the mudStick it in the gut
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 1 December 2017 03:35 (seven years ago)
no quoting Don Henley here
― morning wood truancy (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 1 December 2017 03:38 (seven years ago)
boffins bray -- boffins brag
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 1 December 2017 03:43 (seven years ago)
I repeat: these characters aren’t even competent at playing boring white guys in suits.
― El Tomboto, Friday, 1 December 2017 03:51 (seven years ago)
if only the building would catch fire
― fuck you, your hat is horrible (Neanderthal), Friday, 1 December 2017 03:56 (seven years ago)
deficits don't matter
― reggie (qualmsley), Friday, 1 December 2017 03:58 (seven years ago)
Monuments don’t matter
― El Tomboto, Friday, 1 December 2017 04:17 (seven years ago)
Posts dont matter
― Οὖτις, Friday, 1 December 2017 05:24 (seven years ago)
NEW: McConnell says no more votes until 11 am tomorrow.The tax bill won't finish tonight.— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) December 1, 2017
― Οὖτις, Friday, 1 December 2017 05:28 (seven years ago)
― hi i’m darren and i’m a bouncer from bendigo (bizarro gazzara), Friday, 1 December 2017 10:02 (seven years ago)
i want going to say anything out of respect for your feelings
― illegal economic migration (Tracer Hand), Friday, 1 December 2017 10:04 (seven years ago)
FOX NEWS HOST TO @tedcruz: You cool working with alleged child molester Roy Moore if he's elected?CRUZ: Sure, no problem, that's up to the voters.FOX NEWS HOST: And what about alleged groper Al Franken?CRUZ: Now that's a very serious problem. I'm extremely concerned. pic.twitter.com/1QzMq0Hud5— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) November 30, 2017
― Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 1 December 2017 12:26 (seven years ago)
(wonder what's taking imago so long to start the new thread)
― Le Bateau Ivre, Friday, 1 December 2017 12:27 (seven years ago)
wake up! you have thirty minutes, America
― imago, Friday, 1 December 2017 12:29 (seven years ago)
haha n/r
― imago, Friday, 1 December 2017 12:30 (seven years ago)
US Politics, December 2017: I guess there’s always 2018
― El Tomboto, Friday, 1 December 2017 13:05 (seven years ago)
Oh wtf
― El Tomboto, Friday, 1 December 2017 13:16 (seven years ago)
US Politics December 2017: Deficits Don't Matter
― nashwan, Friday, 1 December 2017 13:17 (seven years ago)