New American economics thread
― sarahell, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 19:37 (four months ago)
would love to post here but need to spend the afternoon reviving beatles threads in order to make up for the current deficit
― budo jeru, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 19:40 (four months ago)
calstars just woke up, maybe we can see what he thinks about futures for imported beer
― budo jeru, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 19:42 (four months ago)
how bout that american economy yall
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 19:42 (four months ago)
previous thread from the 2008 crash:Rolling US Economy Into The Shitbin Thread
― sleeve, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 19:44 (four months ago)
USA: "hold my beer"
line go down
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 19:58 (four months ago)
if you were in australia then line go up, makes u think 🤔
― Monica Belushi (cat), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:06 (four months ago)
maaaate
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:06 (four months ago)
that's a bloody outrage it is
― a (waterface), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:06 (four months ago)
I have had it up to here waiting for the US economics thread to get rebooted!
― the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:07 (four months ago)
lol markets were up bigly this morning and took like a 2000 point swing to the negative by close
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:08 (four months ago)
no one has any idea what going on or why theyre doing what theyre doing
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:09 (four months ago)
we did it
― a (waterface), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:09 (four months ago)
idk shit about the market but the upticks right now are the admin trying to hold things up with twigs and bubblegum until the investors see through it and down she goes
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:11 (four months ago)
Surely you can leak a story every morning about how tariffs are being clawed back and then say "nuh-uh" in the afternoon and the stock market will stay even forever.
― papal hotwife (milo z), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:13 (four months ago)
Brokers clocking in saying to each other, "Surely he'll have given up on this insane bullshit, right?" Then realization that no, insane bullshit is pretty much his only mode now, and... down, down, down we go.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:14 (four months ago)
Public Image Ltd. Album Titles appropriate for the moment:This is what you want…this is what you get Happy?The greatest hits, so far
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:18 (four months ago)
I think it was the doubling down on China that punctured whatever hope helium there was. Or that plus just everyone trying to guess where the bottom's gonna be.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:27 (four months ago)
I alone can fix it.
― dell (del), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:33 (four months ago)
cool thanks
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:33 (four months ago)
Sorry, that was supposed to read “AI alone can fix it.”
― dell (del), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:37 (four months ago)
damn
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:37 (four months ago)
that's what you get for asking chatgpt to make yr posts ;)
― sleeve, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:37 (four months ago)
I can call you Betty, and Betty when you call me you can call AI
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:39 (four months ago)
Mr Krasnov, tear down that wall!
― dell (del), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:39 (four months ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNrQOUtXYOo
― the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:40 (four months ago)
I think it was the doubling down on China that punctured whatever hope helium there was. Or that plus just everyone trying to guess where the bottom's gonna be.― paper plans (tipsy mothra)
― paper plans (tipsy mothra)
we're in portland. we're _all_ in portland.
please send tops. don't worry about that hope helium, we're all _very_ good at blowing.
― Kate (rushomancy), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 20:57 (four months ago)
lol
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 21:00 (four months ago)
Trump claims tariffs bringing in $2bn a day for USDonald Trump has been speaking as he signed executive orders from the White House.
Trump claimed that the US is making $2bn a day from tariffs. He did not provide any details.
“The tariffs are on and money is pouring in at a level we’ve never seen,” he said.
“America is going to be very rich again very soon,” he said.
― xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 21:02 (four months ago)
What can you even say...
― xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 21:03 (four months ago)
with U.S. taxpayers' money
― Andy the Grasshopper, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 21:03 (four months ago)
I was just thinking if he was referring to people paying taxes which include higher capital gains in 2024 and more babby boomer RMDs
― sarahell, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 21:05 (four months ago)
― xyzzzz__, Tuesday, April 8, 2025 4:03 PM (ten minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
Thread for Screaming Into the Void
― gestures broadly at...everything (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 8 April 2025 21:16 (four months ago)
Here is more details on who might be making that money.
https://rajivsethi.substack.com/p/engineered-volatility
― xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 21:22 (four months ago)
^^^
― sleeve, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 21:25 (four months ago)
"buying the dip" but on AI steroids
― sleeve, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 21:26 (four months ago)
An economic lesson from er, Ronald Reagan, tweeted by er, Chinese embassy US account.
Ronald Reagan vs. #tariffs : 1987 speech finds new relevance in 2025pic.twitter.com/CuAMw1eQXN— Chinese Embassy in US (@ChineseEmbinUS) April 7, 2025
― xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 21:29 (four months ago)
as one does
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 8 April 2025 21:31 (four months ago)
William Huo, Intel’s first rep in Beijing: “America got conned by its own elite. And now we’ve got the privilege of importing our own poverty in shiny containers labeled “Made in China. When a politician promises to bring back American manufacturing with tariffs, ask them: who’s going to rebuild the ecosystem Wall Street torched three decades ago? Tariffs won’t fix decades of deindustrialization driven by elite consensus. Only massive, consistent investment in R&D, education, and infrastructure ever could. But first we have to say the quiet part out loud: America was deindustrialized not by China or Mexico, but by its own ruling class chasing yield.”
― sleeve, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 00:43 (four months ago)
Yep.. anything to get away from paying a living wage to American workers
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 00:58 (four months ago)
on the other hand we got cheap tvs have you seen these things its like $300 for a big flat screen tv
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 00:59 (four months ago)
theyre quasi disposable
my (much-older) cousin runs a small music store in a small CA town, and as much as he'd love to have his walls lined with shinty Fender, Martin & Gibson guitars, he just can't really afford to, so he orders guitars from Korea, China & Indonesia. He's shown me a few and I have to admit they seem pretty well constructed, probably using a lot of computer-assisted machinery. They're not 'rough' like we think of Japanese & Italian guitars from the 60's. And they actually sell, because he's not really selling to pros but to people just starting out.. same with brass & woodwinds
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 01:04 (four months ago)
the alleys of Oakland are littered with them, I can attest
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 01:05 (four months ago)
This passage from Bob Woodward's book Fear shows just how fucked we are:
Of course the United States manufactured things, but the reality did not match the vision in Trump’s mind. The president clung to an outdated view of America — locomotives, factories with huge smokestacks, workers busy on assembly lines. [Gary] Cohn assembled every piece of economic data available to show that American workers did not aspire to work in assembly factories...Mr. President, can I show this to you?” Cohn fanned out the pages of data in front of the president. “See, the biggest leavers of jobs — people leaving voluntarily — was from manufacturing.”“I don’t get it,” Trump said.Cohn tried to explain: “I can sit in a nice office with air conditioning and a desk, or stand on my feet eight hours a day. Which one would you do for the same pay?”Cohn added, “people don’t want to stand in front of a 2,000 degree blast furnace. People don’t want to go into coal mines and get black lung. For the same dollars or equal dollars, they’re going to choose something else.”Trump wasn’t buying it.Several times Cohn just asked the president, “why do you have these views?”“I just do,” Trump replied. “I’ve had these views for 30 years.” “That doesn’t mean they’re right,” Cohn said. “I had the view for 15 years I could play professional football. It doesn’t mean I was right.”
Mr. President, can I show this to you?” Cohn fanned out the pages of data in front of the president.
“See, the biggest leavers of jobs — people leaving voluntarily — was from manufacturing.”
“I don’t get it,” Trump said.
Cohn tried to explain: “I can sit in a nice office with air conditioning and a desk, or stand on my feet eight hours a day. Which one would you do for the same pay?”
Cohn added, “people don’t want to stand in front of a 2,000 degree blast furnace. People don’t want to go into coal mines and get black lung. For the same dollars or equal dollars, they’re going to choose something else.”
Trump wasn’t buying it.
Several times Cohn just asked the president, “why do you have these views?”
“I just do,” Trump replied. “I’ve had these views for 30 years.”
“That doesn’t mean they’re right,” Cohn said. “I had the view for 15 years I could play professional football. It doesn’t mean I was right.”
He really believes his insane bullshit, and no one can convince him otherwise.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 01:26 (four months ago)
far from the worst thing during this cursed time but can i just say that i’ve really been disliking seeing scott bessent’s stupid smug face
― flopson, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 01:45 (four months ago)
Cohn’s mistake was referring to other people, who don’t exist to Trump. Should have asked him do YOU want to shovel coal eight hours a day
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 02:21 (four months ago)
People might actually take factory jobs over service industry/LVN/etc. jobs if they existed and the pay was decent, the idea that the two options are "blast furnace" or "incredibly easy e-mail job" isn't real life.
So many not-blast furnace trades jobs (HVAC tech, plumber who gets called out at midnight when the shitter is backed up, etc.) are a) highly demanding of overtime and b) now actually sales jobs because staying employed and making a living wage depends on upselling the person whose AC you're fixing in the middle of August.
― papal hotwife (milo z), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 03:57 (four months ago)
From the old thread, ShariVari sez
Lots of angry chuds out there trying to Gamergate the fake, woke, feminised economy (in this specific case, a viral TikTok video from Australia they are all still mad about a year later).
And I was like wha? Like, doing office work is for women? Then why were they excluded from it, in living memory?
And lo, yes there are people saying things like this.
https://wapo.st/42nDYfR
Rotimi Adeoye
Like the Chinese Cultural Revolution, it glorifies physical labor as moral purification, only now the purification is from the supposed “wokeness” of desk work, filtered through TikTok, X and Twitch. It’s not about creating jobs. It’s about creating vibes: strong men doing hard things, reshared until they become ideology. As one MAGA influencer put it, “Men in America don’t need therapy. Men in America need tariffs and DOGE. The fake email jobs will disappear.”
― I pity the foo fighter (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 05:01 (four months ago)
Men in America don't need incomes to make a living
― symsymsym, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 05:11 (four months ago)
I think there are a few layers.
One is definitely the ‘real men build things’ bit. Apps, B2B SaaS and moving numbers around on spreadsheets are not ‘real’. There is a major push at the moment to re-centre American tech on making things (often drones / military hardware) - with ‘the Gundo’ positioned as the successor to Palo Alto, etc, but there is also a much broader sense that trad occupations - being a (well-remunerated) carpenter, electrician, lineman for the county, etc, all of which these people could actually train to do if they wanted, is just more dignified for men.
Another is definitely the way certain jobs, which remain heavily male-dominated, have been social-media-marketed. It’s at least highly likely that a lot of the ‘my day at company x’ TikTok videos - which suggest there at lots of attractive women milling around in the office, going for coffee or juice breaks between emails, etc, were engineered to drive job applications from men / make returning to the office seem more fun. A lot of very stupid people have taken them literally and think Google is paying 22-year-old women $200k a year to essentially do nothing.
A lot of men resent having a female boss to begin with, which is less likely than it should be but more likely than it was.
The other element is obviously DE&I, which is perceived as making corporate jobs a hostile environment for conservative men or off limits completely which, idk, might be true if you’re Matt Forney and your CV reads Sex Tourist (2012-2017).
― ShariVari, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 07:22 (four months ago)
So stupid but relevant.
Trump: "One thing I learned about the coal miners -- that's what they want to do. You could give them a penthouse on 5th Avenue and a different kind of a job and they'd be unhappy. They want to mine coal. She was gonna put them in a high tech industry where you make little cell… pic.twitter.com/whdR6QSnBz— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) April 8, 2025
― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 08:27 (four months ago)
You watch a Boyd and Raylan “we dug coal together” montage one time…
― papal hotwife (milo z), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 08:45 (four months ago)
this is a good explainer about men being resentful of women having what they think are fake email jobs: https://www.cartoonshateher.com/p/doge-is-about-sex
― jaymc, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 12:16 (four months ago)
I can guarantee you all these social media chuds talking about the manly dignity of manufacturing jobs have never once worked in a factory. I have, more than once. It fucking sucks! And as frustrating and inane as it often is, the desk job I have now is a thousand times better. Sure, it's nice to have something to do with your hands. Take up woodworking, ffs
― feed me with your chips (zchyrs), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 12:43 (four months ago)
― papal hotwife (milo z), Tuesday, April 8, 2025 11:57 PM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink
couple factories near me advertise on tv begging people to work for them offering four day work weeks continuing education grants and free thanksgiving turkeys, and its not intense dangerous heavy industry one does cosmetics the other assembles commercial kitchen appliances, i think factory work just isnt that desirable which i can understand it seems pretty tedious, think theyre paying ~$25 a hour which is prob dece for unskilled labor around here but obvs is not a lot of money in the big scheme of things, certainly not union heyday raise a family on one salary money
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 12:44 (four months ago)
if i had to work at a local factory i would def choose the cheese factory tho
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 12:46 (four months ago)
And think of all that food you'd take home!
― the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 12:55 (four months ago)
mr cheese the cheese man
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 12:56 (four months ago)
Be careful! My dad worked for a company called Food Producers and as a result it was some years before we were allowed to have Dairy Queen - the company made the ice cream formula. They made a few other things my dad also refused to eat when encountered in daily life, but I can’t remember what those were.
― guillotine vogue (suzy), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 12:58 (four months ago)
ha yeah im sure itd get old quick
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 12:58 (four months ago)
Maybe even moldy
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:04 (four months ago)
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:05 (four months ago)
It’s funny because most of the folks i know working blue collar jobs are not in factories but in amazon warehouses
― Heez, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:10 (four months ago)
yeah thats the new factory
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:12 (four months ago)
My granny worked in a biscuit factory (hooray!) and a pickle factory (which I didn't appreciate at the time but would very much appreciate now).
― Please play Lou Reed's irritating guitar sounds (Tom D.), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:17 (four months ago)
Your entire life would smell of vinegar and dill.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:19 (four months ago)
My dad worked as a machinist in that food factory (and a few others).
― guillotine vogue (suzy), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:19 (four months ago)
(xp) I prefer to remember the bags of "brokies" she would bring from the biscuit factory.
― Please play Lou Reed's irritating guitar sounds (Tom D.), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:22 (four months ago)
factory work is skilled work unless you’re like the janitor
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:31 (four months ago)
its just a category thats why i put it in italics, tho idk why youre excluding the janitor, poor janitor
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:32 (four months ago)
(xp) Is putting pickles in a jar skilled work?
― Please play Lou Reed's irritating guitar sounds (Tom D.), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:38 (four months ago)
after watching all of the things janitorial staff are expected to do, I would absolutely not call that unskilled work
― better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:39 (four months ago)
i mean all labor is skilled to some extent obvs a better name to refer to jobs that you can come in with no experience and get trained up pretty fast would be good
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:41 (four months ago)
recall a friend who did piece work shucking oysters telling me how fast some of the ladies who had worked there forever were
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:44 (four months ago)
factory work sucks for the most part what used to be good about it were all the other things that came with it and made it worth it.
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:44 (four months ago)
yup
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:45 (four months ago)
lol nothing against janitors. working factory machinery is skilled work and used to be paid commensurately. of course there's levels. poultry processing requires less training but is absolutely brutal in terms of speed required
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:46 (four months ago)
Trump just now, unconvincingly:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMMAB3MNCKw
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:46 (four months ago)
My one and only factory job was at a factory somewhere half an hour from Southampton, they put on a minibus for us. it was a place called vitacress that made bagged salad, my job was to pick out any (brown) bugs from in amongst the (green) leaves, however I am severely colour blind and couldn't see any so I used to just pretend I was doing it. so throwing leaves up in the air as they went up a conveyor belt, occasionally putting a bit of stalk in a bag, all inside a giant fridge. I did not last very long.
― zoloft keeps liftin' me (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:47 (four months ago)
lol thats some i love lucy shit
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:49 (four months ago)
some factory work more skill than others no doubt like putting items into a box prob doesnt take that long to pick up sewing a dress prob a lot longer
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:53 (four months ago)
my dad worked at a wire factory before he finished his degree, which sounded like it fucking sucked and is also why he taught me to support unions
― underminer of twenty years of excellent contribution to this borad (dan m), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 14:00 (four months ago)
this whole situation is very brexity, a harebrained scheme that assumed trade partners would roll over for it, its of course much worse of an idea than brexit but i guess has the upside that it can be stopped any time
BREAKING: The European Union has approved tariffs on over $23 billion in US goods in retaliation for the 25% duties Trump imposed on the bloc’s steel and aluminum.
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 14:14 (four months ago)
Ryan Broderick ✧@ryanhatest✧✧✧.b✧✧✧.soc✧✧✧·1hSo from my uniquely weird perspective after living in the UK through Brexit, being in India during Modi's demonetization, and living in Brazil when the real tanked during the Bolsonaro administration, I can confidentally say that Americans do not and can not understand how bad this is going to be.
― sleeve, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 14:33 (four months ago)
Of course most factory jobs suck, and coal mining jobs suck even more, and Trump's fixation/obsession with them is a combination of two different nostalgias — for the postwar U.S. economic boom, and the Industrial Revolution era when people knew their places and their places were in giant brutal factories and crawling around underground in the dark.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 14:40 (four months ago)
The full Ryan Broderick thread is worth quoting:
So from my uniquely weird perspective after living in the UK through Brexit, being in India during Modi's demonetization, and living in Brazil when the real tanked during the Bolsonaro administration, I can confidentally say that Americans do not and can not understand how bad this is going to be.To sort of broadly describe what is about to happen if the Trump admin doesn't reverse course, we are quickly racing towards a world where not only does our money just not work correctly anymore day to day, but the background radiation of a crumbling economy will become impossible to ignore.After the Brexit referendum, everything in London just got slightly worse. A year or two in, you could feel it. But that's because it took five years for the country to actually leave the EU. We're speedrunning that. In Brazil, prices would change overnight, stores just wouldn't have stuff.Covering the demonetization experiment in India as a journalist, we spent a day basically trying to get someone to break the equivalent of $50. It took all day and after a couple hours I actually started to feel like a unique form of dread. Like what if your money just suddenly didn't work anymore.I've seen a lot of Americans sort of saying, "oh it'll be like the Great Depression" or "it'll be like the Great Recession," but the global economy is different now. It's way more connected than it was even in 2008. And we essentially just removed ourselves from it this week and then doubled down.You can tell yourself things like, "I guess I won't buy stuff anymore," but it's not that simple. If the tariffs stay in place, we're looking at hyperinflation like Argentina experienced last year (didn't go there, but knew people living there). At certain point, money just doesn't work.This is why any headlines about "de-dollarization" right now should really scare you. Americans have been insulated from the worst of the economic collapses of the 21st century because of the dollar. We are about to find out what it feels like when that's no longer true.
To sort of broadly describe what is about to happen if the Trump admin doesn't reverse course, we are quickly racing towards a world where not only does our money just not work correctly anymore day to day, but the background radiation of a crumbling economy will become impossible to ignore.
After the Brexit referendum, everything in London just got slightly worse. A year or two in, you could feel it. But that's because it took five years for the country to actually leave the EU. We're speedrunning that. In Brazil, prices would change overnight, stores just wouldn't have stuff.
Covering the demonetization experiment in India as a journalist, we spent a day basically trying to get someone to break the equivalent of $50. It took all day and after a couple hours I actually started to feel like a unique form of dread. Like what if your money just suddenly didn't work anymore.
I've seen a lot of Americans sort of saying, "oh it'll be like the Great Depression" or "it'll be like the Great Recession," but the global economy is different now. It's way more connected than it was even in 2008. And we essentially just removed ourselves from it this week and then doubled down.
You can tell yourself things like, "I guess I won't buy stuff anymore," but it's not that simple. If the tariffs stay in place, we're looking at hyperinflation like Argentina experienced last year (didn't go there, but knew people living there). At certain point, money just doesn't work.
This is why any headlines about "de-dollarization" right now should really scare you. Americans have been insulated from the worst of the economic collapses of the 21st century because of the dollar. We are about to find out what it feels like when that's no longer true.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:00 (four months ago)
the main thing I remember from my summers at a factory is how strict everyone was. OSHA regulations required you be given 15 minutes to clean up at the end of the day and if you finished early you still had to wait by the punch clock and if you clocked out a minute early you'd hear about it from three different people. at one point someone messed up and we didn't have any parts for two weeks so there was effectively nothing for us to do so we had to sweep the floors every single day even though there wasn't a speck of dirt on them after the first day. and yet if you were caught slacking off you'd get reprimanded. all this for $6.50 an hour
― frogbs, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:08 (four months ago)
Huh. I always thought factory jobs were like the ones in Modern Times
― the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:12 (four months ago)
I never worked in factories, but I worked in auto parts warehouses, loading exhaust pipes and brake pads and rotors onto trucks for delivery. It wasn't awful — I was promoted to managing a small secondary warehouse all by myself, and once the inventory was taken or a delivery of pipes was shelved, I could basically hang around in the back listening to Ornette Coleman all day, waiting for someone to need a particular pipe — but at its worst it was hard physical work, and I was very glad to get a job in an office.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:17 (four months ago)
This is otm ime … some of this is related to corporate chains vs small businesses/ the one person shop… and then because the 24/7 corporate model exists, customers have come to expect they can get someone out whenever, so the “little guy” can get stuck trying to compete with the big corporations…
― sarahell, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:25 (four months ago)
(xps) To be honest, I think he's exaggerating the Brexit effect more than somewhat, as many hardcore Remainers are wont to do.
― Please play Lou Reed's irritating guitar sounds (Tom D.), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:26 (four months ago)
I did warehouse work in my 20s and saw dozens of guys fuck up their backs, one got a hernia, another fell off an industrial shelving unit and later died … no heat, no A/C … like unperson, when I ended up with an office job after a few years of warehouse work… I had an appreciation for it that probably people who had only had desk jobs didn’t have.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:31 (four months ago)
When I was first interviewing for journalism jobs I used to joke in the interview, "If you hire me, I'll be the only editor you've got who can drive a forklift."
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:33 (four months ago)
And re janitors— my ex had worked as a janitor while in college… it was really great to be in a relationship with a man who knew how to clean things.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:34 (four months ago)
I did warehouse shit for a little while, too. Loading trucks at a distro center. Bear in mind I was, and am, a skinny dude without a lot of muscle. Shit was miserable, and it made me realize for the first time in my life why so many people choose to drink themselves into oblivion on the weekends.
― feed me with your chips (zchyrs), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:35 (four months ago)
I never had a factory job, but did spend four summers doing road construction work for a local county highway department. I can tell you that spending 100 degree plus days in August shoveling hot asphalt or walking behind a trailer filling cracks with hot tar from 7:30 a.m. until dusk was enough to still make me appreciate every single desk job I've had.
― better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:36 (four months ago)
Xp did you do the thing where you had a person or two stand on a pallet and use the forklift to lift them up to adjust items on a high shelf so that they wouldn’t fall off the pallet when you brought it down? …
― sarahell, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:39 (four months ago)
I knew a guy who was a roofer. He was the person I envied the least. Out in the sun all day slapping down coats of tar or spending the whole day on your knees stapling shingles into place.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:39 (four months ago)
I was just gonna mention roofing. Which I've never done, but I see those guys out there in the sun and whooee. Plus there you have the ever-present danger of falling.
Physical labor is mostly really hard! The most "physical" jobs I've ever had were in bartending, restaurant kitchens and retail, and even there just being on your feet for 8 hours is exhausting. (Plus I was in my 20s and early 30s for those jobs, could absorb it a lot better.)
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:41 (four months ago)
lot of ex cons in roofing guys who cant get work elsewhere
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:46 (four months ago)
One of the other problems with physical labor like roofing, warehouse work, etc is there is often not enough of a financial safety net in those professions so that if a worker gets hurt, they are often extra fucked … like I remember downplaying a foot injury so I could continue to work, because I needed the money.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:47 (four months ago)
ive worked in kitchens which i kind of liked because i like cooking and theres some camaraderie to the scene but its def pretty hard work, at least doesnt involve lifting that much heavy stuff tho
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:49 (four months ago)
can i ask a dumb question very specific to my life because i don't get any of this stuff and i trust you all (while also understanding that anything can happen)?
i'm close to buying a $50Kish car this weekend. like literally calling the dealership today (because another deal fell through), talking to them about it, and then hopefully driving over there Saturday and buying it.
should i, like, *definitely* do that because now's the time and shit's about to get bad? or should i not do that because shit's about to get bad and things are going to change in a way that is advantageous for me?
it *feels* to me like it's the former, but i guess i'm interested to hear what you all think. the Broderick thread above got me spooked.
― alpine static, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:54 (four months ago)
Many of these jobs are done by undocumented immigrants…. including farmwork … idk if the government has nostalgia for the dust bowl era but it wasn’t like a bunch of white MAGA types were moving to California to pick lettuce…
― sarahell, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:54 (four months ago)
Yes, buy now. Prices ain’t goin’ down.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:55 (four months ago)
I worked at a grocery store in high school that also had its own cows and milk bottling operation. Part of my job was to put on rubber boots and stand in the bed of a pickup full of half rotten produce and shovel it to the cows a couple of times a week. The smell was pretty bad, especially in the summer.
― il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:55 (four months ago)
Alpine, please do not buy a new car … get a used car.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:55 (four months ago)
100% buy the car as soon as you can.
― a (waterface), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:56 (four months ago)
xpost i'm sorry, i should've specified: it's a 2022 car w/ 18K miles on it - what i think is a nice, solid, safe, reliable car (a Volvo XC90)
― alpine static, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 15:59 (four months ago)
i could've written that better ... added the make/model after the rest, sorry
Good choice!
― sarahell, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:01 (four months ago)
i don't know that buying a new vs used car is much better either way at this point
― a (waterface), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:01 (four months ago)
if you need a car id get it, if you can hold off with your old car id do that
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:06 (four months ago)
since we're on this topic should i get a new phone? maybe this should be it's own thread. iphone 14 plus bought in August 2023. battery is fine.
― a (waterface), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:09 (four months ago)
no
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:10 (four months ago)
phew
― a (waterface), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:12 (four months ago)
gonna have to pry my 2020 iphone 7 outta my cold dead hands
― sleeve, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:12 (four months ago)
^^
― sarahell, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:22 (four months ago)
i buy my phones second hand on ebay much rather be walking around with a $150 computer in my pocket that i might break or lose at any minute than a $1000 one
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:23 (four months ago)
Yeah the phones are pretty well built to last now. My last two were a 9 and then -- six years later and only because I figured 'eh, might as well' -- a 15 Pro, my current one. It absolutely does everything I need it to and then some.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:24 (four months ago)
I did buy a 4th backup hard drive yesterday
― sleeve, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:25 (four months ago)
I bought Lindt chocolate lol
― sarahell, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:32 (four months ago)
xpost There is wisdom in this approach. (Probably mentioned it elsewhere but in late January with the initial rumblings happening I figured 'you know, I should do this' and upgraded to the latest MacMini and I'm rather grateful.)
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:32 (four months ago)
I wish I could spring for a new Mac to future-proof but I'm not brave enough to put it on credit and let the chips fall where they may yet.
― papal hotwife (milo z), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:42 (four months ago)
i should also add that i have a 15yo and a 12yo who will presumably need cars at some point in the near-ish future. i think we need to buy the nice, reliable car that will hopefully last us for 15 years.
if i'm lucky, we'll have to figure out how to take it with us to another country to live.
― alpine static, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:43 (four months ago)
is there a thread for wondering and worrying about the world you brought your kids into
― alpine static, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:44 (four months ago)
Obama was president when they were born. i know he's not perfect, but...
just got a refurbished 2022 macbook air, should be good for the next 10 years
― gestures broadly at...everything (voodoo chili), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 16:46 (four months ago)
Oh indeed?
https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/04/09/congress/bessent-cancels-hill-appearance-amid-market-turmoil-00280957
Per the final sentence: "Lawmakers were told Bessent was called into a meeting with Trump, the person said." But for all we know that could just be getting Bessent to change his diaper.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:01 (four months ago)
I’m basically fucked right now, gl everybody
― brimstead, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:04 (four months ago)
Nicholas Grossman ✧@nicholasgross✧✧✧.b✧✧✧.soc✧✧✧·5hThe bond market shows capital flight from the United States, with people selling off US debt.It’s the opposite of what usually happens during economic turmoil, when people buy US debt because they think it’s the safest asset in the world.The US-led global economic system is dead. By suicide.
It’s the opposite of what usually happens during economic turmoil, when people buy US debt because they think it’s the safest asset in the world.
The US-led global economic system is dead. By suicide.
― sleeve, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:06 (four months ago)
gl brimstead
― sleeve, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:07 (four months ago)
yeah the Treasury Bond thing is crazy.. I guess people in the administration have already been plotting ways to not make interest payments to foreign countries holding U.S. securities, like 'we spend so much to protect you, and then you expect us to pay YOU interest?' etc.
That's normally a rock-solid safe haven to park money during crazy times
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:14 (four months ago)
Here: In a recent development, President Trump's comments about the US debt, specifically suggesting the possibility of renegotiating or defaulting on some Treasury bonds, have sent shockwaves through financial markets, causing a sell-off in US government debt and raising concerns about the US's financial stability.
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:22 (four months ago)
lol 90 day tariff pause, Dow jumps 2500 points. so fucking shady
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:30 (four months ago)
holy shit...there was a market update on Bloomberg that started a with the market less than 1% and ended ~2 minutes later up 5%. insanity.
― j.o.h.n. in evanston (john. a resident of chicago.), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:31 (four months ago)
you damn well there are people in Donalds orbit that are getting the heads up on this shit
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:35 (four months ago)
you know*
he did another 'Thank you for your attention to this matter!' WTF
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:38 (four months ago)
yeehaw
https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:43ck35s3crmdzqkghid2zsgv/bafkreids3le33lg72teuvctdh3beborrx6xur7lmzcxwg3opqo35mhbaw4@jpeg
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:39 (four months ago)
Yet he's raising the China tariffs to 125%... I think he still really believes that China will be paying that
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:40 (four months ago)
if he doesnt lift chinas tariffs then it kinda doesnt matter if he lifts the rest
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:41 (four months ago)
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, April 9, 2025 1:35 PM (five minutes ago)
he posted "THIS IS A GREAT TIME TO BUY!!!" this morning on TS
― rob, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:41 (four months ago)
trump blinked first
― 龜, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:42 (four months ago)
right, bro's getting sonned in his own trade war
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:44 (four months ago)
jesus christ so crazy
― a (waterface), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:44 (four months ago)
Why doesn't he just raise tariffs to a million percent?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:45 (four months ago)
We would all get instantly so rich.
i bought a new laptop at a goooood price last Dec or so, we will be good for awhile.
i did read something where people were kinda hoping the market would crash hard so trump would be punished and stop being so psycho
doesn't seem like that's going to be the case
― a (waterface), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:45 (four months ago)
I think the treasury bond sell-off probably freaked them out, that was unexpected I'm sure
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:46 (four months ago)
From The Guardian:
It was not clear whether China, which is one of the world’s largest holders of Treasuries, included among its policy changes the sale of those bonds, accelerating the sell-off and the US administration’s financial pain.
haha you fucked with the wrong country Donnie
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:54 (four months ago)
― a (waterface), Wednesday, April 9, 2025 12:45 PM (ten minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
we'll see if he does this again in 90 days
― gestures broadly at...everything (voodoo chili), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 17:59 (four months ago)
If he were really smart he would pause every other country's tariffs on *us*. Dipshit needs to think outside the box.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 18:06 (four months ago)
Still holding cash tyvm
― Its big ball chunky time (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 18:10 (four months ago)
Actual footage of White House trade negotiationshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mK_ArvBk8H0
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 18:12 (four months ago)
Headline: Dow surges 2,600 points for biggest rally in 5 years after Trump pauses some tariffs
Let us celebrate the near return to baseline of a patient that had every reason to believe they might be dying until the doctor said 'sike', and let us ignore the inevitable slow degradation of that patient's health that was spurred by the doctor's very very funny practical joke
― Great-Tasting Burger Perceptions (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 18:14 (four months ago)
So is this market manipulation is going to happen every 90 days? Cool.
― imperial frfr (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 18:21 (four months ago)
its “funny” how republicans are against government regulating and doing stuff, this all sure smells like “government overreach” or whatever it is they pretend to get mad about
― brimstead, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 18:27 (four months ago)
I don't know why anyone would even take him at his word about the 90 day pause. His Majesty could restart this shit again later this afternoon if it's His will to do so, who even fucking knows at this point
― Great-Tasting Burger Perceptions (Old Lunch), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 18:29 (four months ago)
Maybe the CIA showed him the secret files on JFK this morning.
― papal hotwife (milo z), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 18:34 (four months ago)
"Sir, take a look at just how easy this was to pull off."
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 18:35 (four months ago)
Reusing the Castro R&D to throw together an exploding Diet Coke can.
― papal hotwife (milo z), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 18:37 (four months ago)
DEEP STATE, IF YOU'RE LISTENING
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 18:43 (four months ago)
now watch as he transforms this abject failure into an incredible world-changing deal
they're definitely fretting about the China thing, Beijing shows no signs of backing off
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 18:44 (four months ago)
so when do we break ground on all the new factories?
― rob, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 18:48 (four months ago)
im building a factory right now, just need to get a shovel
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 18:55 (four months ago)
from the CBC's liveblog:
14 minutes agoPrime Minister's Office in the darkRhianna Schmunk
I’m a senior writer on the national desk. A spokesperson with the Prime Minister's Office said Ottawa has no further clarity on Trump's shift this afternoon.
16 minutes agoCanada gets the new tariffAlexander Panetta
Now, some bad news from Washington: the White House says Canada and Mexico will be subject to the new, worldwide tariff of 10 per cent.
It was confirmed in a statement to CBC News.
What's not clear, and we're awaiting details from the White House, is what happens to the earlier tariffs on Canada, the so-called fentanyl tariff of 25 per cent on some products, and similar tariffs on steel, aluminum and some automotive trade.
There's no answer yet. What we do know is that this is a very chaotic development. Trump's trade representative had just been on Capitol Hill and had insisted that Trump was abiding by the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, because he had spared those countries from a broad tariff.
Now? Who knows. Representatives of various industries are scrambling for clarity. As are we.
― rob, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 18:58 (four months ago)
canadian fentanyl smells like maple, it's easy to spot
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 19:00 (four months ago)
Ok we can all buy new apple products now
― sarahell, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 19:11 (four months ago)
until he changes his mind again tomorrow morning at 3 AM
― sleeve, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 19:12 (four months ago)
yeah so get on it!
― a ZX spectrum is haunting Europe (Daniel_Rf), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 19:13 (four months ago)
with the 125% china tariff and 10% tariffs on canada and mexico, tariffs are actually higher than they were after last wednesday's big announcementhttps://bsky.app/profile/peark.es/post/3lmfnb6klks2b
― gestures broadly at...everything (voodoo chili), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 19:24 (four months ago)
So this is very clearly and obvious market manipulation, no? Trump's cronies get the heads up on these announcements and act accordingly. Good reason for him to obliterate oversight too. It's all a grift.
― better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 19:27 (four months ago)
i dont think its the primary motivation, that would be trump just really liking tariffs, but if you can get a little grift in on the side sure why not
― lag∞n, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 19:32 (four months ago)
i think he didn't even realize the effect he could have until the little tease on Monday
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 19:34 (four months ago)
The NYT still calls them 'reciprocal tariffs,' lol
― the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 19:37 (four months ago)
enjoying the stock market redditor meltdowns: "sir, this is BLATANTLY market manipulation and clearly illegal insider trading!!!"
― budo jeru, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 19:55 (four months ago)
ah, sorry jon v jon, i didn't see your post.
my point's just it's always been a scam and might as well burn to the ground
― budo jeru, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 19:56 (four months ago)
my core understanding of the stock market is that it is complete and total bullshit, but I still can't help but ask: Apple stock plummeted due to the company's dependence on China, why is it now rebounding due to the announcement of even higher tariffs on China? is it just that my theory is true + traders are deeply stupid herd-like creatures?
― rob, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 20:03 (four months ago)
yes, which is why you don't drive in circles around them in an ATV firing a shotgun in the air
― Iza Duffus Hardy (President Keyes), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 20:08 (four months ago)
Apple has been trying to spread out its supply chain away from China, rolling back tariffs (somewhat) on the rest of the world might be good enough to offset the increased China tariff.
― papal hotwife (milo z), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 20:16 (four months ago)
ah thanks milo, and yeah I'm now reading that they set up production of some products (iPads, airpods) in India and Vietnam...but I'm also seeing that 90% of their iPhones are still made in China
― rob, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 20:26 (four months ago)
ok lol the nyt says:
To add to the uncertainty, the president said he might consider exempting some U.S. companies from the tariffs over the 90-day pause period. He said his thinking on this would be made “instinctively.”
― rob, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 20:29 (four months ago)
outta respect for the markets
― nashwan, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 20:34 (four months ago)
Maybe, as per thread, this is an own goal, we'll see.
what happened is actually massive. they all stared down the barrel and the rest of the world said ‘okay we’ll unload your treasuries’ and bond yields spiked. the idea that the US can just push everyone around at will is over— BO (@bo_austin_) April 9, 2025
― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 20:40 (four months ago)
he might consider exempting some U.S. companies from the tariffs
"Once I see what they might do for me, you never know..."
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 20:44 (four months ago)
"If I get a taste... then BAM! no more tariffs"
― better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 20:55 (four months ago)
Well yeah, it’s a global shakedown. And it’s not going to stop, this is his only and entire MO. Not just in terms of tariffs but in terms of literally everything. This is what we have endlessly for (nearly) four more years. We’re trapped with this dickhead and everyone has to pay attention to every stupid thing he does.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 21:08 (four months ago)
this is probably obvious to everybody but there was definitely some massive insider trading going on here - if the Dems had any balls they'd hammer them on this
https://i.imgur.com/oye5PHx.png
― frogbs, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 21:08 (four months ago)
I'll be very disappointed if a newspaper doesn't use the headline Capitulation Day.
― Please play Lou Reed's irritating guitar sounds (Tom D.), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 21:15 (four months ago)
My least favorite Rush b-side.
― better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 21:17 (four months ago)
ok lol the nyt says:To add to the uncertainty, the president said he might consider exempting some U.S. companies from the tariffs over the 90-day pause period. He said his thinking on this would be made “instinctively.”― rob, Wednesday, April 9, 2025 4:29 PM (fifty minutes ago)
To add to the uncertainty, the president said he might consider exempting some U.S. companies from the tariffs over the 90-day pause period. He said his thinking on this would be made “instinctively.”― rob, Wednesday, April 9, 2025 4:29 PM (fifty minutes ago)
this will lend further creedence to the 'kiss the ring' motivation for all of this.
also if the biggest china exporters like apple end up getting an exemption, tariffs are gonna end up being pretty toothless
― 龜, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 21:22 (four months ago)
pretty sure that's a drive by truckers song xp
― Its big ball chunky time (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 21:22 (four months ago)
Make America Grovel Again.
― Please play Lou Reed's irritating guitar sounds (Tom D.), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 21:47 (four months ago)
Predictably, they're already crowing about what a negotiating masterstroke this was: "By god, he DID IT!"
Everything went to plan
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 22:06 (four months ago)
classic move from the abusive dad playbook, destabilize everyone with threats you almost follow through on - to the point where it's debatable whether you actually did or not - and then "rescue" everyone from them.
― five six seven, eight nine ten, begin (map), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 23:11 (four months ago)
― sleeve, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 23:12 (four months ago)
We've alienated all of our allies around the world so no one is going to trust our country again, no one, and I'm including people who run companies here in the US, who will be reluctant to hire new people or make any kind of investment in the future. He will do innumerable crazy things on a daily basis to benefit himself and his billionaire cronies at our expense, it will destabilize us and we will be on an inevitable downward slide for at least the next 4 years, probably longer, becoming poorer and more isolated
So many people I know, including people on the left, didn't seem that alarmed about the possibility of this happening and didn't think it would affect them personally. This also includes my rich friends who thought they would benefit from republican tax cuts and capital gains tax cuts but are now shocked at the mayhem
But his craziness was plainly laid out beforehand for all of us to see
― Dan S, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 23:42 (four months ago)
― papal hotwife (milo z), Wednesday, April 9, 2025 1:37 PM (five hours ago) bookmarkflaglink
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, April 9, 2025 1:43 PM (five hours ago) bookmarkflaglink
lee, its your cousin, marvin harvey oswald
― kendrick lamaze "to push a baby out" (m bison), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 23:54 (four months ago)
I'm pretty sure someone could convince him to ride through downtown Dallas in an open convertible.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Thursday, 10 April 2025 00:00 (four months ago)
Xp Dan - anyone who likes capital gains tax cuts would be unhappy with this current situation.
― sarahell, Thursday, 10 April 2025 00:21 (four months ago)
yes, since there are no capital gains!
― Dan S, Thursday, 10 April 2025 00:22 (four months ago)
I got the reference!
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 10 April 2025 00:40 (four months ago)
He's trying to hijack the entire economy. This all really does feel like a drive to trigger a great crisis, that they can use to crack down on whoever they want.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 10 April 2025 03:51 (four months ago)
Meanwhile the deal between the IRS and DHS is pretty scary in a looming police state way.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 10 April 2025 04:27 (four months ago)
This is what I've been banging on about in my own inarticulate way for the past month. They are engineering crashes and chaos so that they can profit while tightening the screws on everyone else.
xp
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Thursday, 10 April 2025 04:29 (four months ago)
lol what if it is just the Russians? They're acting like they would be if it was just the Russians (or some cabal, but especially Russia) calling the shots. If it's the Russians, then of course they don't give a shit about any of the things we care about, government- or law-wise. They want to just dispense with them, or bring them to heel. It's what Putin did. And lots of other strongmen, obviously. But it's a Putin-esque model.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 10 April 2025 04:34 (four months ago)
The weird mascunlinity nonsense is very Putinesque.:.
― m0stly clean (Slowsquatch), Thursday, 10 April 2025 05:11 (four months ago)
There seem to be two different levels, the first being the ideological affinity with the Russian model across the board from Thiel, Yarvin, Sachs, going back 15+ years. I don't think that needs anything external
But the second, of seemingly wanting to advance Russia's interests, not just replicate Russia, is more difficult to parse
― anvil, Thursday, 10 April 2025 05:19 (four months ago)
our gangsters are so strangely like russia's gangsters because they're gangsters and gangsters are alike. they help each other out because even gangsters from different gangs share a preference for things in general to be good for gangsters. that's why our gangsters helped their gangsters destroy the soviet union. now their gangsters are helping our gangsters destroy the postwar united states. but if their gangsters disappeared tomorrow, our gangsters would happily carry on destroying it all by themselves.
― difficult listening hour, Thursday, 10 April 2025 06:44 (four months ago)
I think there is a definite sense of Trump trying to centralise his authority over all potential sources of power (education, federal workforce, courts, big business, etc), in a manner consistent not just with Putin but other autocrats like Orban, to which the market has just said ‘lol, get fucked’.
― ShariVari, Thursday, 10 April 2025 08:48 (four months ago)
trying to centralise his authority over all potential sources of power (education, federal workforce, courts, big business,
This has pretty much been successful. Universities, law firms, and corporate America have tripped over themselves to ditch DEI and cut deals that preserve their access/funding.
― il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Thursday, 10 April 2025 11:08 (four months ago)
It's the seven towers thing, they've been quite deliberate about it...
― m0stly clean (Slowsquatch), Thursday, 10 April 2025 15:50 (four months ago)
Market rapidly giving up yesterday's gains. I wonder what stunt he can pull to juice it up again.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 10 April 2025 15:58 (four months ago)
now that america is great again, i'm looking forward to working in an amazon asbestos packing plant with no HR department for $12/hr. to own the libs
― budo jeru, Thursday, 10 April 2025 15:59 (four months ago)
its such a farce if the tariffs stay in play much longer the real material effects will hit home and no amount of malarky will be able to change it
― lag∞n, Thursday, 10 April 2025 16:00 (four months ago)
Tariffs on China at 145%. This is the spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs posting
We are Chinese. We are not afraid of provocations. We don’t back down. 🇨🇳 pic.twitter.com/vPgifasYmI— Mao Ning 毛宁 (@SpoxCHN_MaoNing) April 10, 2025
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 10 April 2025 16:02 (four months ago)
it definitely seemed weird to me that the market made a near full recovery yesterday despite there still being a huge tariff on China, the country that's become synonymous with "cheap goods"
it's also strange because he didn't say he was pulling the tariffs, he said "90 day pause", which means it's all being kicked down the road until July, at which point the market is assuming Trump will either forget about them, or claim that they've made big beautiful deals with everyone? or maybe they've all figured out that this is just yet another pump and dump scheme?
― frogbs, Thursday, 10 April 2025 16:30 (four months ago)
He's waiting for another dip he can goose with his "terrific deal making" for his cronies to make another grab.
― better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 10 April 2025 16:35 (four months ago)
Frogbs otm — it was very weird to watch … I kinda think the bargain hunting mentality was at play, as well as the analysts kinda improvising in terms of valuations… because they are supposed to assign values to things and not say … I have no fucking idea.
― sarahell, Thursday, 10 April 2025 16:40 (four months ago)
Laminariales @kelpkelpkelp.bsky.social
Ironically the pause gives every other country on Earth the breathing room to figure out how to excise the USA from their international trade flows as much as possible. Now they can all deliberate as a bloc.
If he kept them on there might have been some panic, and pressure to make a bad deal.
― jaymc, Thursday, 10 April 2025 16:41 (four months ago)
the initial headlines were just that the tariffs were paused and i dont think we got all the specifics til after close
― lag∞n, Thursday, 10 April 2025 16:42 (four months ago)
Not every stock is down today. I was checking to see how much blood was on the floor and one stock caught my eye. Wheeler Real Estate Invesments (WHLR) is UP 21.5% so far today, from 2.37 to 2.88! Then I noticed its 52 week high was, uh, 3,588.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, 10 April 2025 16:44 (four months ago)
There’s also short-term thinking vs long-term … like, take Apple as an example… at one point it went back up to $200/share … long-term thinking might be “$200/share is a really good deal as I think it will go back up eventually”
― sarahell, Thursday, 10 April 2025 16:45 (four months ago)
Rheinmetal had a very good morning too
it definitely seemed weird to me that the market made a near full recovery yesterday despite there still being a huge tariff on China, the country that's become synonymous with "cheap goods"it's also strange because he didn't say he was pulling the tariffs, he said "90 day pause", which means it's all being kicked down the road until July, at which point the market is assuming Trump will either forget about them, or claim that they've made big beautiful deals with everyone? or maybe they've all figured out that this is just yet another pump and dump scheme?― frogbs, Thursday, April 10, 2025 12:30 PM (thirteen minutes ago)
― frogbs, Thursday, April 10, 2025 12:30 PM (thirteen minutes ago)
it's because the markets got confirmation trump is a wuss who'll back down. which means in 90 days trump is gonna put on another pause
― 龜, Thursday, 10 April 2025 16:46 (four months ago)
it definitely seemed weird to me that the market made a near full recovery yesterday despite there still being a huge tariff on China, the country that's become synonymous with "cheap goods"it's also strange because he didn't say he was pulling the tariffs, he said "90 day pause", which means it's all being kicked down the road until July, at which point the market is assuming Trump will either forget about them, or claim that they've made big beautiful deals with everyone? or maybe they've all figured out that this is just yet another pump and dump scheme?― frogbs, Thursday, 10 April 2025 12:30 (ten minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
― frogbs, Thursday, 10 April 2025 12:30 (ten minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
i think yesterday’s rally was mostly relief at the signal that trump does in fact still respond to external stimuli and isn’t completely dug in. according to maggie haberman it was the rise in treasury yields that spooked him. even if the economic damage from tariffs didn’t decline much, the pause is reassuring in that trump seems to want to avoid spooking the markets into a broader financial crisis
― flopson, Thursday, 10 April 2025 16:47 (four months ago)
Well things are down again today
― sarahell, Thursday, 10 April 2025 16:50 (four months ago)
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/10/opinion/ross-douthat-interesting-times.html
I thought this was surprisingly excellent. Cass makes the more sane and cogent case for use of tariff policy but concedes, under some sharp questioning from Douthat, that the way Trump did it isn't likely to achieve the stated goals. Douthat makes a pretty good case at the very end that it's worse, that Trump may have actually killed off any appetite for the kind of protectionism Cass advocates.
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 10 April 2025 16:57 (four months ago)
Apparently, yesterday after the Big Announcement that Totally Contradicts the Previous Day's Big Announcement (BATTCTPDBA for short) the Treasury Secretary told curious reporters that Trump had showed 'incredible courage' by holding firm "for as long as he did". This man is clearly an adept toe-sucker.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, 10 April 2025 16:59 (four months ago)
oren cass is such a hack
― flopson, Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:00 (four months ago)
Well things are down again today― sarahell, Thursday, 10 April 2025 12:50 (ten minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
― sarahell, Thursday, 10 April 2025 12:50 (ten minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
sure, but yesterdays rally was only a partial recovery anyways, it didn’t even recover to where it was april 2nd, and markets are still far away from recovering back to where they were in february
― flopson, Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:04 (four months ago)
Yields, stocks and dollar going down. Assuming the markets want Trump to back down on Chinese tariffs.
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:05 (four months ago)
https://i.imgur.com/MjR3pJj.jpg
― the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:06 (four months ago)
too soon ;)
― sleeve, Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:06 (four months ago)
i can't believe i fucking miss that guy
― a (waterface), Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:08 (four months ago)
A three month pause is also too much volatility.
Also needs saying his mental health could degrade even further by then lol. Can't see Trump seeing out four years of this xps
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:09 (four months ago)
i'm never going to listen to 48 minutes of a ross douthat podcast, but giving oren cass the respect and time of day is way out of line. he should be laughed out of the room. the idea that any of this is even about economics, that there is a "debate" to be had among rational people, totally misses the mark. as others have said, it's all about creating chaos, and using the ensuing uncertainty to do various cronyisms as well as crack down on perceived enemies. oren cass is a joke but douthat is a fool and a stooge in his own way
― budo jeru, Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:11 (four months ago)
the market losing all the gains from yesterday. has Donald let us know it's a good time to by again yet?
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:13 (four months ago)
Budo, you are too generous… I can’t even do a “4 minute read” by that guy … I would rather street team Andrea Long Chu … which I am also not going to do lol
― sarahell, Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:15 (four months ago)
the idea that any of this is even about economics, that there is a "debate" to be had among rational people, totally misses the mark. as others have said, it's all about creating chaos, and using the ensuing uncertainty to do various cronyisms as well as crack down on perceived enemies
i mean it’s definitely about economics. extremely stupid bad and wrong economics perhaps, but economics nonetheless. it’s not like trump and navarro got together and said “hey, what’s the best way we can create chaos and uncertainty? how about implementing the crackpot economic theories we’ve been advocating for publicly for decades”
― flopson, Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:23 (four months ago)
GWB laid a lot of the groundwork for the loss of civil liberties we are experiencing now, so miss me with "miss me"
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:24 (four months ago)
the idea that any of this is even about economics, that there is a "debate" to be had among rational people, totally misses the mark. as others have said, it's all about creating chaos, and using the ensuing uncertainty to do various cronyisms as well as crack down on perceived enemiesi mean it’s definitely about economics. extremely stupid bad and wrong economics perhaps, but economics nonetheless. it’s not like trump and navarro got together and said “hey, what’s the best way we can create chaos and uncertainty? how about implementing the crackpot economic theories we’ve been advocating for publicly for decades”
― flopson, Thursday, April 10, 2025 12:23 PM (twenty-three seconds ago) bookmarkflaglink
I'll ask for an explanation about what's "crackpot" about Cass another time, preferably one broader than what happened to some washing machine factory over the course of a couple years.
I definitely do not think Trump hatched some brilliant plan to create chaos. I think he is a moron who doesn't know what he's doing.
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:25 (four months ago)
the yet party of miss me yet is pretty funny at this point since it was so long ago like he shows up periodically to ask the question then glumly goes home to do more painting
― lag∞n, Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:25 (four months ago)
Yields, stocks and dollar going down. Assuming the markets want Trump to back down on Chinese tariffs.― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 10 April 2025 13:05 (eighteen minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 10 April 2025 13:05 (eighteen minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
yields down is good for trump’s pov. what spooked him yesterday was yields going up because people were dumping treasuries and buying dollars
usd going down is kinda good from his perspective too, since it makes us exports cheaper. makes the tariffs more painful for consumers and importers though
― flopson, Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:26 (four months ago)
feel like he would want a strong dollar tho he likes strong things
― lag∞n, Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:27 (four months ago)
higher yields = US debt is perceived as riskier and gets more expensive, the opposite of what he (or anyone) wants
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:27 (four months ago)
*borrowing gets more expensive
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:28 (four months ago)
Trump talks out of both sides of his mouth about whether he wants a strong or weak dollar. He somehow wants to be able to have the benefits of both.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/27/briefing/donald-trump-currency.html?unlocked_article_code=1.-k4.vsTr.566wbNoFGY9n&smid=url-share
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:36 (four months ago)
same
― lag∞n, Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:36 (four months ago)
I'll ask for an explanation about what's "crackpot" about Cass another time, preferably one broader than what happened to some washing machine factory over the course of a couple years
i was calling navarro and trump’s economic theories (i.e., any bilateral trade deficit is prima facie evidence of unfair non-tariff trade barriers) crackpot. cass is just a hack who constantly lies. i wouldn’t go so far as to call cass a “crackpot”, but he’s chosen to throw in his lot in with trump and navarro so
i have many other studies other than the washing machine one, very happy to share and discuss. tho i suspect what happens the next few months will obviate the need for any careful econometric analysis of the question “do tariffs really raise prices a lot more than they create jobs”. with a shock this big it should be pretty clear
― flopson, Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:37 (four months ago)
“full faith and credit of the us government” doesnt hit as hard when the us government is actively being dismantled xp
― 龜, Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:38 (four months ago)
if the value of the dollar crashes, we at least want individual dollars to be strong enough to be used as a good substitute once the emergency hits the inevitable toilet paper shortage stage
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:40 (four months ago)
feel like he would want a strong dollar tho he likes strong things― lag∞n, Thursday, 10 April 2025 13:27 (nine minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
― lag∞n, Thursday, 10 April 2025 13:27 (nine minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
i don’t think trump has ever said “i want a weak dollar” but the idea, known as the “mar-a-lago accord”, was originally proposed by chairman of trump’s CEA stephen miran. iirc vance tweeted something along those lines once?
― flopson, Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:41 (four months ago)
You don't like weak dollar, you get bored so quickYou don't like strong dollar cause they're hip to your tricks
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:47 (four months ago)
The panic happening among investors is that money has to be somewhere. When you pull your money out of US stocks, you must decide where else will it go? The greatest fear of money managers is losing the money they manage. So they look around the entire global financial system and everywhere is in disarray. They must choose something right away. Even cash must be in some form of currency, but which? USD? Euros? They have no ideas. Nothing looks safe. Their money is in jeopardy. Panic time!
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, 10 April 2025 17:56 (four months ago)
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, April 10, 2025 12:56 PM (three minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
https://scontent-lga3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/490011119_10171094028035304_5209719871657155512_n.jpg?_nc_cat=107&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=127cfc&_nc_ohc=ei6FDpx0kcsQ7kNvwEHoGGY&_nc_oc=AdkY4jbIz2wL0nugtQO4ozyRdAb9KalAnBkrH6YSw2JXD4fxHF_UxI4bBrMbqf9OTCg&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-lga3-2.xx&_nc_gid=G7qXlyC6kq5j8b3jlSJokA&oh=00_AfHtgGiwvnNCgAJvXzbsisPmZO0D9Uu1sMtODtyRU7-oSA&oe=67FDC8DB
Up 19% over the past five days
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 10 April 2025 18:03 (four months ago)
"yields down is good for trump’s pov. what spooked him yesterday was yields going up because people were dumping treasuries and buying dollars"
Sorry I meant its going up again (I just said 'down' as in its bad again). Referring to this post as of an hour ago. But its all v fluid rn..
The miserable triple whammy begins again: Stocks down, 10yr bond yields up, dollar down. pic.twitter.com/vXiYIAH1y7— Mike Bird (@Birdyword) April 10, 2025
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 10 April 2025 18:04 (four months ago)
helllllo crypto, the safe money storage dept
― Theodor W. Adorbso (Hunt3r), Thursday, 10 April 2025 18:08 (four months ago)
i mean you caint cheat with crypto it aint fiat money, it’s magic electrons my computer and some dudes with great pods
― Theodor W. Adorbso (Hunt3r), Thursday, 10 April 2025 18:10 (four months ago)
And yet Bitcoin down 4% today too, funny about that.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 10 April 2025 18:13 (four months ago)
that’s quitter talk
― Theodor W. Adorbso (Hunt3r), Thursday, 10 April 2025 18:16 (four months ago)
gold goes up, up, up though
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 10 April 2025 18:17 (four months ago)
haha I was just wondering abt that
― sleeve, Thursday, 10 April 2025 18:20 (four months ago)
gold? sure it's going to go up. but there's far too much money sloshing around looking for a safe haven. if it all went to gold, it'd be $1m a troy oz in no time. the winners in this free for all will be managers who can jump to the next haven fastest, stay long enough to make their profit, then cash out quick and race to the next 'safe' haven fastest.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, 10 April 2025 18:34 (four months ago)
From the NYT:
U.S. stocks tumbled about 4 percent in early afternoon trading on Thursday as investors assessed the worsening trade war with China, and President Trump clarified that he had raised tariffs on Chinese goods by a total of 145 percent since taking office.
There were other alarming signs on Thursday: In the government bond market, U.S. Treasuries started to sell off again, with the yield on 10-year Treasuries climbing to 4.37 percent, the highest since February. The technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite index dropped nearly 7 percent, with shares in Apple, Nvidia and other tech giants falling. And oil prices fell about 4 percent, with Brent crude, the international benchmark, trading below $63 a barrel.
Together, the signals pointed toward a mood shift since Wednesday afternoon, when the markets cheered Mr. Trump’s decision to postpone many of his tariff plans for three months.
Just highlighting "Wednesday afternoon" because lol, that's just 24 hours, how long can we keep doing this.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 10 April 2025 18:43 (four months ago)
shit I'm gonna buy a barrel of oil
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 10 April 2025 18:50 (four months ago)
'Just leave it on the sidewalk, thanks.'
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 10 April 2025 18:51 (four months ago)
oil is down, too
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, 10 April 2025 18:51 (four months ago)
oil being down is pretty straightforward - a recession means less demand for energy
it's been going down ever since liberation day
― 龜, Thursday, 10 April 2025 18:56 (four months ago)
Xp Aimless— American Rebel Holdings — this is outpacing Tesla & Palentir in terms of volatility
― sarahell, Thursday, 10 April 2025 19:06 (four months ago)
shawn fain wearing a red and white t-shirt with “Ross Perot Was Right” written on it on david sirota’s podcast lol.. what a world
https://www.levernews.com/content/images/size/w1200/2025/04/LeverNews-ShawnFain-SOCIAL.png
― flopson, Thursday, 10 April 2025 19:17 (four months ago)
Trump said he was “resetting the table” and that he had “great respect” for Chinese president Xi Jinping who has been “friend of mine for a long period of time”. Trump added:
I think that we’ll end up working out something that’s very good for both countries.
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 10 April 2025 19:51 (four months ago)
In contrast European stock markets have been doing pretty well.
― Please play Lou Reed's irritating guitar sounds (Tom D.), Thursday, 10 April 2025 19:59 (four months ago)
Gonna have a keg party, no Bud Lite, just crude.
― the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 10 April 2025 20:02 (four months ago)
https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:mf5dzzqkp7fnmby6blfeljwj/bafkreiegohfgslcpqmj4f3mmrgrvtpnbadl4d4ysqcaihynqucr3tji4ey@jpeg
― lag∞n, Thursday, 10 April 2025 21:04 (four months ago)
life comes at you fast etc
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Thursday, 10 April 2025 21:14 (four months ago)
what the fuck was she celebrating about anyway? that the Dow & Jones was creeping back towards its high last week? it's still down dumbass
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 10 April 2025 21:15 (four months ago)
What was that map said about the abusive dad dynamic of causing a crisis and then ending it, then you’re the hero.
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 10 April 2025 21:20 (four months ago)
yep
― sleeve, Thursday, 10 April 2025 21:30 (four months ago)
European stocks have also been down…
― sarahell, Thursday, 10 April 2025 21:35 (four months ago)
that lady is a dumbass
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Thursday, 10 April 2025 23:07 (four months ago)
My favorite thing about this whole episode has been Karoline Leavitt and the MAGA folks saying "Clearly you missed The Art of the Deal." Oh right, that classic negotiation strategy where no one can actually understand what your offer is, and where you contradict the messages sent by your own side, and then you suddenly back down and no one has any idea what "deal" was made.
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Friday, 11 April 2025 00:09 (four months ago)
https://preview.redd.it/1vx0c542lute1.jpeg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=bb7eb63a65506c2acee3633fdedd7bb20f429470
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 April 2025 00:39 (four months ago)
Much to consider.
Wow Argentina swung from a huge trade deficit in 1998 and to an even huger trade surplus in 2003.Legendary policy success, I wonder why nobody talks about it pic.twitter.com/GVfBTXNHJJ— Guy Berger (@EconBerger) April 11, 2025
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 11 April 2025 10:30 (four months ago)
European Commission trade spokesperson Olof Gill told Ireland’s RTE radio:The trade commissioner is gong to Washington to try and sign deals. That is what we are focused on.However, he suggested the EU are not ruling out further retaliation if talks turn sour:All options are on the table should that not lead to a good outcome.
The trade commissioner is gong to Washington to try and sign deals. That is what we are focused on.
However, he suggested the EU are not ruling out further retaliation if talks turn sour:
All options are on the table should that not lead to a good outcome.
One thing is giving Trump a call and setting up meetings. Another is actually striking up a trade deal that is a good outcome to all parties.
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 11 April 2025 10:54 (four months ago)
Hope they wear suits and say thank you, or some such bullshit.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 April 2025 12:42 (four months ago)
https://open.substack.com/pub/deanblundell/p/carneys-checkmate-how-canadas-quiet
― trm (tombotomod), Friday, 11 April 2025 13:03 (four months ago)
The art of the Carney
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Friday, 11 April 2025 13:12 (four months ago)
Dean Blundell?! massive grain of salt on any take that guy has.
― FRAUDULENT STEAKS (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 11 April 2025 13:32 (four months ago)
Just a very triumphant tone. Might be right but makes me (that's right) pause.
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 11 April 2025 13:35 (four months ago)
The sell-off in US Treasuries has continued, with yields on short and long-term bonds still on the rise.The yield on 10-year note has jumped to 4.4% and is on course for its largest weekly rise since the early 2000s. That compares with 4.1% at the start of the week on 7 April, and 3.99% last Friday.Long-term yields are also up, with the 30-year at 4.9%.Some are debating whether angered Beijing may be behind the moves.Richard Hunter, head of markets at interactive investor, said:The latest lurch down followed US confirmation that the cumulative tariff rate on China was now 145%, leading to more widespread selling of Treasuries with the concomitant rise in yields, such as the 10-year note which jumped to 4.4% and is on course for its largest weekly rise since the turn of the century.There is also some speculation that the US moves have resulted in some unintended consequences, with the possibility that a proportion of the selling is actually coming from China, who are moving out of their Treasury exposure.
The yield on 10-year note has jumped to 4.4% and is on course for its largest weekly rise since the early 2000s. That compares with 4.1% at the start of the week on 7 April, and 3.99% last Friday.
Long-term yields are also up, with the 30-year at 4.9%.
Some are debating whether angered Beijing may be behind the moves.
Richard Hunter, head of markets at interactive investor, said:
The latest lurch down followed US confirmation that the cumulative tariff rate on China was now 145%, leading to more widespread selling of Treasuries with the concomitant rise in yields, such as the 10-year note which jumped to 4.4% and is on course for its largest weekly rise since the turn of the century.
There is also some speculation that the US moves have resulted in some unintended consequences, with the possibility that a proportion of the selling is actually coming from China, who are moving out of their Treasury exposure.
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 11 April 2025 13:37 (four months ago)
― trm (tombotomod), Friday, 11 April 2025 14:09 (four months ago)
he used to be a (obnoxious) morning radio host in the early 2000s for an alt radio station in Toronto. so for my morning alarm i was kind of stuck with him. somewhat popular but typical morning jock, with a few cackling sycophants hanging around and would often act like an asshole, because he wasn't really all that funny or intelligent. anyways – one morning they had Ben Mulroney on the show (nepo baby son of a former prime minister who was a tv celebrity news host). never cared for the guy much and especially didn't care for his dad. anyways they're having a boring convo and dean is trying to be edgy, while also sucking up to the guy – and they are about to wrap up and Ben asks Dean something along the lines of "well, now that you have me here, is there anything you'd like to say to my face?" and dean is just kind of like "huh?". ben proceeds to rip into him for trash talking him and his wife and then sucking up to him in person. like he really fucking gave it to him and dean was literally speechless. it was fucking hilarious. dude was incapable of stammering any kind of response and then they cut to commercial. when they came back it was just dean and of of his fart sniffers and they all tough talk like "lets see him come back here and say that stuff" (which makes zero sense because he was just there). dude's all mouth when they guy has left, it was pathetic. i realized that was the first time i'd laughed listening to him in a looong time and switched my clock radio to like cbc or something like that and maybe 5 or so years later he was accused of some defiant behaviour with an coworkers or something and he was done. anyways, that's dean blundell.
― FRAUDULENT STEAKS (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 11 April 2025 14:32 (four months ago)
defiant=deviant
― FRAUDULENT STEAKS (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 11 April 2025 14:33 (four months ago)
BOOM:*US TOLD CHINA TO REQUEST A XI-TRUMP CALL: CNN— Joe Weisenthal (@TheStalwart) April 11, 2025
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 11 April 2025 15:06 (four months ago)
TRUMP DID A BOOM BOOM!
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Friday, 11 April 2025 15:07 (four months ago)
y'know, only nixon trump could go to beg to china
― Theodor W. Adorbso (Hunt3r), Friday, 11 April 2025 15:16 (four months ago)
"We insist that you ask us to call you! No, you're a desperate, sweaty loser! Shut up!"
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Friday, 11 April 2025 15:17 (four months ago)
yo is it true dean blundell got sonned by ben mulroney in a wife beef??????
― flopson, Friday, 11 April 2025 15:18 (four months ago)
car dealers are buying cars back at higher prices than they sold em for
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-04-11/-i-need-to-buy-your-car-back-trump-s-tariffs-cause-chaos-at-dealerships?sref=vuYGislZ
i forgot who was posting about buying a volvo recently... i guess you should buy it??
― 龜, Friday, 11 April 2025 15:22 (four months ago)
My dad is getting ready to sell an old but low-mileage car, he's probably timed the market well.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Friday, 11 April 2025 15:23 (four months ago)
Two senior White House officials tell CNN that the US will not reach out to China first. Trump has told his team that China must be the first to make the move, as the White House believes it is Beijing that has chosen to retaliate and further escalate the trade war.That stance has been conveyed to Beijing for roughly two months, with Trump’s team clearly telling Chinese officials that Xi should request a call with Trump. But Beijing has repeatedly refused to arrange a leader-level phone call, according to three sources familiar with the official communications.One hurdle, Trump’s team believes, is Xi’s desire not to be seen as weak by making the first move and approaching the US for talks.
That stance has been conveyed to Beijing for roughly two months, with Trump’s team clearly telling Chinese officials that Xi should request a call with Trump. But Beijing has repeatedly refused to arrange a leader-level phone call, according to three sources familiar with the official communications.
One hurdle, Trump’s team believes, is Xi’s desire not to be seen as weak by making the first move and approaching the US for talks.
― Kim Kimberly, Friday, 11 April 2025 16:03 (four months ago)
fucking toddlers
― FRAUDULENT STEAKS (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 11 April 2025 16:04 (four months ago)
But stomping his foot and insisting that Xi be the one to reach out — and making this insistence public knowledge — makes Trump look strong, right?
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Friday, 11 April 2025 16:10 (four months ago)
trump and his handlers don't realize that we azn people put on the honor and face shit but we're all making *screwball gestures* *wank motions* once we get back to the house
― Its big ball chunky time (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 11 April 2025 16:19 (four months ago)
Admirably, correctly.
― nashwan, Friday, 11 April 2025 16:33 (four months ago)
_One hurdle, Trump’s team believes, is Xi’s desire not to be seen as weak by making the first move and approaching the US for talks._But stomping his foot and insisting that Xi be the one to reach out — and making this insistence public knowledge — makes Trump look _strong_, right?
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Friday, 11 April 2025 16:37 (four months ago)
I'd like to see Trump try to jump hurdles.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 11 April 2025 16:45 (four months ago)
"HERE IS A HUGE TARIFF OUT OF NOWHERE! Don't retaliate. If you don't retaliate, I will give you a better, lower tariff. WHAT, YOU RETALIATED?! I WARNED YOU! HERE IS A HIGHER TARIFF! OH, YOU'RE RETALIATING MORE?! WELL HERE IS AN EVEN HIGHER TARIFF! OH, YOU'RE RETALIATING AGAIN?! Please give me a call to negotiate. Why aren't you calling?"
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Friday, 11 April 2025 16:48 (four months ago)
everyone on the conservative subreddit is deep into "why do leftists want chinese children to be enslaved to make us cheap junk??" their brains are working very hard
― budo jeru, Friday, 11 April 2025 17:01 (four months ago)
we could be enslaving children right here at home!
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Friday, 11 April 2025 17:12 (four months ago)
they yearn for the mines
― sleeve, Friday, 11 April 2025 17:12 (four months ago)
“When our children can?”
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Friday, 11 April 2025 17:13 (four months ago)
DeSantis is on it!
― Andy the Grasshopper, Friday, 11 April 2025 17:30 (four months ago)
There was just a China v. Russia poll on ILX, which China won, time for a China v. USA poll?
― Please play Lou Reed's irritating guitar sounds (Tom D.), Friday, 11 April 2025 17:48 (four months ago)
To a lot of emotionally deranged people, that’s manly alpha dog behavior.― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland)
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland)
i think people tend to underacknowledge how utterly deranged trump supporters are. i've known people who were more sensible while in the depths of an ether binge.
― Kate (rushomancy), Friday, 11 April 2025 20:59 (four months ago)
I cannot describe how utterly fucked the US appears to be right now. Abortion outlawed in many states. Guns absolutely everywhere. On the precipice of no longer being the global financial hegemon. A completely fucked civil society that is being further fucked daily. Republicans in charge of most state senates. Anyone who speaks up against *checks notes* Israel deported. What the fucking fuck. It’s APRIL. I’m sorry this is doomposting and I’m sorry my oh my fucking god. We’re a long way from idly figuring out how to bring trams back to metropolitan areas.
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 11 April 2025 21:04 (four months ago)
Its seriously crazy that because one guy won't call the other one first we might get some kind of global financial meltdown.
At least we have the weekend off on that front.
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 11 April 2025 21:17 (four months ago)
Also kinda fucked to find oneself actively rooting against one's own country. Like, I'm not actually much of an "America must be destroyed" type. I like it here, for the most part. But Donald Trump must be destroyed. Nothing bad that happens to him is too much. Heart attack? Stroke? Necrotizing fasciitis? Absolutely, bring it on. Whatever it takes.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Friday, 11 April 2025 21:24 (four months ago)
can't we all just agree to hurry up and get to reconstruction?
― Its big ball chunky time (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 11 April 2025 21:25 (four months ago)
Absolutely, bring it on. Whatever it takes
maybe not death though, because then we get the couch fucker
Tracer, I get your anxiety.. I try to focus on good things in my life (like going backpacking with friends in the redwoods tomorrow) but the incessant shittiness coupled with the smug grins of these fucks is a lot to handle. Maybe I should reduce my media consumption but its all so awful, you absorb it through osmosis anyway
― Andy the Grasshopper, Friday, 11 April 2025 21:40 (four months ago)
I'm also getting more and more pissed at Trump voters, whom I blame, and that's not exactly helping the polarization in this country
― Andy the Grasshopper, Friday, 11 April 2025 21:43 (four months ago)
The few people I know who Should Have Known Better seem to actually be regretting it (tbf, they are not in states where Trump could have won so their votes didn't matter) and I am really resisting tearing their heads off.
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive), Friday, 11 April 2025 22:48 (four months ago)
The Trumpers I'm aware of are still sounding like this
"You are completely wrong.
Trust me, it’s all going to work out perfect. Nothing bad is going to happen. It’s all under control.
Why do you keep saying these things? I can tell when there’s trouble looming, and I really don’t sense that right now. We’re in control of this situation, and we know what we’re doing. So stop being so pessimistic.
Look, you’ve been proven wrong, so stop talking. You’ve had your say already. Be quiet, okay? Everything’s fine.
You’re wrong."
― papal hotwife (milo z), Friday, 11 April 2025 22:53 (four months ago)
the high-profile deportation cases are pushed to the front on Fox & Fucks to distract from the economic nightmare unfolding... angertainment
― Andy the Grasshopper, Friday, 11 April 2025 22:59 (four months ago)
I've done a pretty good job of excommunicating the people in my life that I know voted for Trump. Fuck 'em all, what the hell did we ever have in common anyway.
― henry s, Friday, 11 April 2025 23:46 (four months ago)
I don’t have many vocal right-wingers on my regular feeds, but the few I do I’ve just started blocking. I don’t care what they have to say, and I especially don’t want to get baited into arguing with them. I have checked the box about where they’ve landed and leave it at that.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Friday, 11 April 2025 23:52 (four months ago)
There's that one whataboutist dipshit on your FB that makes my blood boil.
― I think we're all Bezos on this bus (WmC), Saturday, 12 April 2025 00:00 (four months ago)
WHO makes my blood boil, sorry.
there used to be, in my mind, a distinction between country club republicans like Romney, Colin Powell etc.. and the MAGA/Tea Party numbnuts
that distinction is pretty much eroded by this point
― Andy the Grasshopper, Saturday, 12 April 2025 00:11 (four months ago)
Yeah he’s terrible, I’ve put him on snooze and deleted a bunch of his comments, but blocking is in order. It’s too bad because he was the last guy on that side I could talk to at all, but what’s the point.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 12 April 2025 00:11 (four months ago)
it's seriously unnerving to look at the people you know who used to be very clearly country club republicans, and not know when they went through the metamorphosis
― 𓂸 (␈), Saturday, 12 April 2025 00:32 (four months ago)
Thanks to Fox & Freaks, most likely
― Andy the Grasshopper, Saturday, 12 April 2025 00:34 (four months ago)
Xp - some of the country clubbers became democrats… not a huge ideological jump at this point tbh
― sarahell, Saturday, 12 April 2025 00:43 (four months ago)
the short jump to centrism v. the crisco-lathered slide to 'recessions are patriotic actually'
― 𓂸 (␈), Saturday, 12 April 2025 01:00 (four months ago)
on Easter morning, the kids have to share one egg to hide
― Andy the Grasshopper, Saturday, 12 April 2025 01:03 (four months ago)
How to understand the market if you only watch Fox News:
https://bsky.app/profile/thedailyshow.com/post/3lmfloenso22e
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Saturday, 12 April 2025 01:22 (four months ago)
Perfect
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Saturday, 12 April 2025 02:29 (four months ago)
There are probably some country club Republicans who are hanging in there hoping the party will come back to its senses. They’re a bit like the southern Democrats who hung in through the 70s and 80s waiting for the party to get racist again.
― Iza Duffus Hardy (President Keyes), Saturday, 12 April 2025 02:49 (four months ago)
country club Republicans were barely less crazy and just better at not sieg heiling in public
― papal hotwife (milo z), Saturday, 12 April 2025 03:09 (four months ago)
The few people I know who Should Have Known Better seem to actually be regretting it (tbf, they are not in states where Trump could have won so their votes didn't matter) and I am really resisting tearing their heads off.― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive)
― longtime caller, first time listener (man alive)
there's no _point_ is what i've learned. either they change their ways or they don't. nothing any of us say or do will change them. that's the despair, knowing that these people are in power and the people who had the ability to stop them - that's not us - didn't. my despair is less about the republicans and more about the _democrats_. they _will not fight for us_. what the hell are we supposed to do, you know? they got the guns _and_ they got the numbers. the one thing we got going for us is that they just want to shoot, and they don't give a fuck who they hit.
the thing about fascism of this sort is that it _doesn't win_. it's idiotic and self-destructive. i mean, who the hell is going to fight for america, at this point? what the hell is there that's worth fighting for?
this long ago stopped being an aberration. this is a culmination. this is what 250 years of "america" have brought us to. america is over, if you want it.
― Kate (rushomancy), Saturday, 12 April 2025 14:21 (four months ago)
don’t you guys have a politics thread for this
― flopson, Saturday, 12 April 2025 14:35 (four months ago)
the tariffs exemptions have started
The U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency announced good news for Apple, Nvidia, Dell, and others late Friday night. A new list of goods to be exempted from the latest round of tariffs on U.S. importers was released, and it includes smartphones, PCs, servers, and other technology goods, many of which are assembled in China.Importers of these electronics will no longer face the newest taxes, and it cuts the Chinese rate down to 20% for them. The exceptions cover $385 billion worth of 2024 imports, 12% of the total. It includes $100 billion from China, 23% of 2024 imports from there. For these electronics, the average tax rate went from 45% to 5% with this rule.The biggest global exemption is the import category that includes PCs and servers, with $140 billion in 2024 imports, 26% of it from China. Circumstances may change again, but this benefits AI king Nvidia, server-makers like Dell, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and Super Micro, and PC makers like Dell and HP. The average tax rate went from 45% to 5% here, according to Barron’s calculations.The biggest newly exempt category for Chinese goods is smartphones, with $41 billion in 2024 U.S. imports, 81% of all smartphone imports. A 145% tax on that would be $60 billion, but even the new 20% tax is a hefty $8 billion.
Importers of these electronics will no longer face the newest taxes, and it cuts the Chinese rate down to 20% for them. The exceptions cover $385 billion worth of 2024 imports, 12% of the total. It includes $100 billion from China, 23% of 2024 imports from there. For these electronics, the average tax rate went from 45% to 5% with this rule.
The biggest global exemption is the import category that includes PCs and servers, with $140 billion in 2024 imports, 26% of it from China. Circumstances may change again, but this benefits AI king Nvidia, server-makers like Dell, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and Super Micro, and PC makers like Dell and HP. The average tax rate went from 45% to 5% here, according to Barron’s calculations.
The biggest newly exempt category for Chinese goods is smartphones, with $41 billion in 2024 U.S. imports, 81% of all smartphone imports. A 145% tax on that would be $60 billion, but even the new 20% tax is a hefty $8 billion.
https://www.barrons.com/articles/tariffs-exclusions-exemptions-apple-nvidia-dell-smartphones-pcs-b2e069ff
― flopson, Saturday, 12 April 2025 14:38 (four months ago)
that's really funny
― 龜, Saturday, 12 April 2025 14:48 (four months ago)
don’t you guys have a politics thread for this― flopson
― flopson
i... don't understand the objection. the problem i have talking about politics is that people seem _really caught up in the moment_ and don't step back to look at the bigger picture. i don't see why i'm supposed to care about what the trump administration is announcing exactly this minute, because they're clearly deranged and will say the opposite five minutes from now. american economic policy is functionally identical to "grifting". does anyone care to dispute that statement?
― Kate (rushomancy), Saturday, 12 April 2025 14:52 (four months ago)
just do it in the us politics thread is all i ask
― flopson, Saturday, 12 April 2025 15:01 (four months ago)
― Kate (rushomancy)
I hear you, which is why a better solution -- one I follow -- is to refrain from posting unless I really have to and unless I have a zinger.
― the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 12 April 2025 15:03 (four months ago)
― 龜, Saturday, 12 April 2025 bookmarkflaglink
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 12 April 2025 15:15 (four months ago)
Seems healthy
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/12/trump-tariffs-on-china-mean-irreversible-damage-for-most-businesses.html
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 12 April 2025 15:56 (four months ago)
just do it in the us politics thread is all i ask― flopson
i don't follow the uspol thread! this is the thing, i don't usually engage in politics, especially not if i have a zinger haha (you know me, i'm prone to walls of text). i really don't understand where you're coming from here, genuinely. to me, economics is political.
anyway, if i'm engaging in politics, it's for personal reasons - it's because there's something going on that does directly affect me. my posts are definitely less rhetoric-based and more emotion-based, and i'll readily admit that i do have a history of clinical paranoia. i just don't know how to discuss us economics rationally at this point. trump is clearly not a rational actor. how can i have a rational response to someone like that? i'm certainly willing to be talked down, and in fact, have been talking myself down. i'd love to see america reach some kind of stable economic and political equilibrium, providing it's one in which i have, like, basic human rights. it's really hard to see a path towards that right now.
sometimes i gotta say things, because otherwise i'm carrying all this dread and despair around in my head. writing is how i talk myself down from it. i try not to share it, but i mean, honestly, your critical response, even though i don't understand it, has helped me talk myself down. that's not something i really get from the uspol thread.
― Kate (rushomancy), Saturday, 12 April 2025 15:57 (four months ago)
it's very easy to forget what thread i'm on lately. US politics, Canadian politics, US economy, world economy, occasional baseball threads... it's all being dominated by one absolute cancer of a human and his shitgoblin's antics.
to man alive: tell them off and cut them out. they deserve to hear it we have all earned our cathartic eruptions at this point.
anyways, will save that stuff for the politics threads going forward.
― FRAUDULENT STEAKS (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Saturday, 12 April 2025 16:04 (four months ago)
so if you’re a giant business with lobbyists trump has time for you. Got it.
― Tracer Hand, Saturday, 12 April 2025 16:19 (four months ago)
i really don't understand where you're coming from here, genuinely. to me, economics is political
i don’t disagree with this and i’m not typically one to thread police, but you all were on a pretty long tangent about whether or not to block the one right wing guy on your fb/twitter feed when i tut-tutted
― flopson, Saturday, 12 April 2025 16:45 (four months ago)
Dividing the last thread between a global economy thread and one which has 'US' on the title has led us on a strange path.
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 12 April 2025 16:52 (four months ago)
i’m reading that the china tariff exemptions on electronics computers phones and chips only applies to final products, so e.g. a us-based plant that manufactures electronics using parts made in china still has to pay 145% while making the whole thing in china is a 20% tariff. hilarious rakestepping doofus move
― flopson, Saturday, 12 April 2025 16:54 (four months ago)
Dividing the last thread between a global economy thread and one which has 'US' on the title has led us on a strange path.― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 12 April 2025 12:52 (one minute ago) bookmarkflaglink
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 12 April 2025 12:52 (one minute ago) bookmarkflaglink
the shittest of paths
― flopson, Saturday, 12 April 2025 16:55 (four months ago)
This is a continuation of the previous US economy thread … that had US in the title …
― sarahell, Saturday, 12 April 2025 16:56 (four months ago)
Unfortunately, the US had to drag the rest of us into it.
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 12 April 2025 17:11 (four months ago)
hilarious rakestepping doofus move
Good title for May's US politics thread.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Saturday, 12 April 2025 17:19 (four months ago)
just speculating here but i think the consumer electronics exemption may augur the beginning of the end of liberation day tariffs. after upping the ante with the 145% tariff and publicly begging china to call him, trump starts unilaterally reducing barriers while china keeps theirs in place. he’s shown his hand, every industry will now barge in begging for exemptions, all china has to do is wait and the tariff wall will crumble, and they keep all the leverage. if team trump have any foresight they’ll anticipate this and take actions to try to save face and precipitate a “deal” next week
― flopson, Saturday, 12 April 2025 17:37 (four months ago)
They’re a bit like the southern Democrats who hung in through the 70s and 80s waiting for the party to get racist again.― Iza Duffus Hardy (President
― Iza Duffus Hardy (President
Well, worked out for them tbf
― SPENGE (Bananaman Begins), Saturday, 12 April 2025 17:57 (four months ago)
Oh i’m sure they’d have been thrilled by the last nominee
― Iza Duffus Hardy (President Keyes), Saturday, 12 April 2025 18:21 (four months ago)
lol now lutnick is saying the tariff exemptions on tech are only temporary and a bunch of other people in trump world are contradicting him
Smartphones, computers and other electronic devices that won exemptions from some US tariffs will be part of a forthcoming levy on semiconductors, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said, dampening what China had called a “small step” toward easing the trade fight between the world’s two biggest economies.
Breaking: A senior Wall Street executive w ties to the Trump White House described @howardlutnick ’s comments about the temporary nature of the tariff exemptions as “off message. Now the market will open way down again since it appears the administration is totally confused. Susie (Wiles) needs to get control of Lutnick. He is a wrecking ball.”
― flopson, Sunday, 13 April 2025 18:18 (four months ago)
Scoop: There is significant division inside the @WhiteHouse over @howardlutnick ’s comments on the temporary nature of the tariff exemptions, an apparent 180 from where the world thought the trade negotiations were going, sources tell me. Of course the only opinion that really matters in the president’s but I am told plenty of people really believe he is “off message” of trying to create a trade regime that involves negotiations even with China and actions that don’t roil the markets including the all important bond market. This story is developing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyL9cdXqXtE
― Tracer Hand, Sunday, 13 April 2025 18:30 (four months ago)
well, ofc the only people who are both acceptable to Trump and willing to serve under him are basically irresponsible, dim-witted, or otherwise unfit to fill their position under any other president. by his own design they're all just bits and bobs hanging off his coattails.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Sunday, 13 April 2025 18:44 (four months ago)
This shit is so idiotic nobody’s gonna want to deal with us anymore
― frogbs, Sunday, 13 April 2025 18:59 (four months ago)
Hope so.
― Nuts, whole hazelnuts (Tom D.), Sunday, 13 April 2025 19:06 (four months ago)
"Liberation Day" may come to have many more meanings than Trump intended.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Sunday, 13 April 2025 19:17 (four months ago)
No leftist is more committed than Trump to destroying capitalism and American hegemony
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Sunday, 13 April 2025 19:24 (four months ago)
It is true that he burned through what passed for the A-team during Trump 1 so we are really left with the crustiest combo of incompetence and utter lack of scruples that can be found in the united states. cockfarmers to a man
― Tracer Hand, Sunday, 13 April 2025 19:28 (four months ago)
trump’s showman instincts where he wants everything to have maximum suspense and drama are a hilariously disastrous fit for econ policy making. like apparently there are new tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals coming in a couple weeks? why not just announce everything all at once?
― flopson, Sunday, 13 April 2025 19:30 (four months ago)
sounds like you're little yippy, flopson
― Tracer Hand, Sunday, 13 April 2025 19:31 (four months ago)
Ratings! xpost
― the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 13 April 2025 19:32 (four months ago)
It is true that he burned through what passed for the A-team during Trump 1 so we are really left with the crustiest combo of incompetence and utter lack of scruples that can be found in the united states. cockfarmers to a man― Tracer Hand, Sunday, 13 April 2025 15:28 (two minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
― Tracer Hand, Sunday, 13 April 2025 15:28 (two minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
mnuchin was legit pretty good. i wonder if he’d come back under the right circumstances once bessent and lutnick get thrown under the bus
― flopson, Sunday, 13 April 2025 19:32 (four months ago)
everybody needs not to panic. we're just raising taxes on all of our trading partners at once for no discernible reason, let's be cool about this
― Tracer Hand, Sunday, 13 April 2025 19:33 (four months ago)
raising taxes on all of our trading partners at once
by making the basic 10% tariffs universal and not playing favorites it ensures there are no winners and losers in this trade war. there are only losers.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Sunday, 13 April 2025 20:04 (four months ago)
lol at being off message. How can anyone in or out of the administration have any idea what the message is?
And that's a good point about Trump's need for the spotlight. He loves the executive orders. He loves playing the role of Strong Leader in tweetable bites. If that means keeping everyone guessing about everything, he likes that too.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 13 April 2025 20:40 (four months ago)
DETROIT — As President Donald Trump’s 25% tariffs on imported vehicles remain in effect despite a pullback this week on other country-based levies, analysts are expecting massive global implications for the automotive industry due to the policies.They’re expecting to see a drop in vehicle sales in the millions, higher new and used vehicle prices, and increased costs of more than $100 billion for the industry, according to research reports from Wall Street and automotive analysts.“What we’re seeing now is a structural shift, driven by policy, that’s likely to be long-lasting,” Felix Stellmaszek, Boston Consulting Group’s global lead of automotive and mobility, told CNBC. “This may well be the most consequential year for the auto industry in history – not just because of immediate cost pressures, but because it’s forcing fundamental change in how and where the industry builds.”BCG expects tariffs to add $110 billion to $160 billion on an annual run rate basis in costs to the industry, which could impact 20% of U.S. new-vehicle market revenues, increasing production costs for both U.S. and non-U.S. manufacturers.The Center for Automotive Research, a Michigan-based nonprofit think tank, believes costs for automakers in the U.S. alone will increase by $107.7 billion. That includes $41.9 billion for Detroit automakers General Motors, Ford Motor and Chrysler parent Stellantis.Both analyses take into account the 25% tariffs on imported vehicles implemented by Trump on April 3 as well as forthcoming levies of the same amount on automotive parts that are set to begin by May 3.Automakers and suppliers may be able to bear some of the cost increases, but they’re also expected to pass them along to U.S. consumers, which could in turn lower sales, according to analysts.“We believe the tariffs as proposed will raise the cost of both importing and manufacturing vehicles in the US by at least a low to mid single digit thousand dollar level on average, and we believe it will be hard for the auto industry to fully pass this on, especially with softening consumer demand more generally,” Goldman Sachs analyst Mark Delaney said in a Thursday investor note.Goldman Sachs assumes new vehicle net prices in the U.S. will rise by roughly $2,000 to $4,000 over the next six- to 12-month timeframe to better reflect tariff costs.
They’re expecting to see a drop in vehicle sales in the millions, higher new and used vehicle prices, and increased costs of more than $100 billion for the industry, according to research reports from Wall Street and automotive analysts.
“What we’re seeing now is a structural shift, driven by policy, that’s likely to be long-lasting,” Felix Stellmaszek, Boston Consulting Group’s global lead of automotive and mobility, told CNBC. “This may well be the most consequential year for the auto industry in history – not just because of immediate cost pressures, but because it’s forcing fundamental change in how and where the industry builds.”
BCG expects tariffs to add $110 billion to $160 billion on an annual run rate basis in costs to the industry, which could impact 20% of U.S. new-vehicle market revenues, increasing production costs for both U.S. and non-U.S. manufacturers.
The Center for Automotive Research, a Michigan-based nonprofit think tank, believes costs for automakers in the U.S. alone will increase by $107.7 billion. That includes $41.9 billion for Detroit automakers General Motors, Ford Motor and Chrysler parent Stellantis.
Both analyses take into account the 25% tariffs on imported vehicles implemented by Trump on April 3 as well as forthcoming levies of the same amount on automotive parts that are set to begin by May 3.
Automakers and suppliers may be able to bear some of the cost increases, but they’re also expected to pass them along to U.S. consumers, which could in turn lower sales, according to analysts.
“We believe the tariffs as proposed will raise the cost of both importing and manufacturing vehicles in the US by at least a low to mid single digit thousand dollar level on average, and we believe it will be hard for the auto industry to fully pass this on, especially with softening consumer demand more generally,” Goldman Sachs analyst Mark Delaney said in a Thursday investor note.
Goldman Sachs assumes new vehicle net prices in the U.S. will rise by roughly $2,000 to $4,000 over the next six- to 12-month timeframe to better reflect tariff costs.
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/04/12/auto-tariffs-sales-costs.html
― flopson, Sunday, 13 April 2025 20:52 (four months ago)
great piece by adam posen arguing that china, not the us, has "escalation dominance" leverage in the upcoming trade war
https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/trade-wars-are-easy-lose
In 2024, U.S. exports of goods and services to China were $199.2 billion, and imports from China were $462.5 billion, resulting in a trade deficit of $263.3 billion. To the degree that the bilateral trade balance predicts which side will “win” in a trade war, the advantage lies with the surplus economy, not the deficit one. China, the surplus country, is giving up sales, which is solely money; the United States, the deficit country, is giving up goods and services it does not produce competitively or at all at home. Money is fungible: if you lose income, you can cut back spending, find sales elsewhere, spread the burden across the country, or draw down savings (say, by doing fiscal stimulus). China, like most countries with overall trade surpluses, saves more than it invests—meaning that it, in a sense, has too much savings. The adjustment would be relatively easy. There would be no critical shortages, and it could replace much of what it normally sold to the United States with sales domestically or to others.
The United States will face shortages of critical inputs ranging from basic ingredients of most pharmaceuticals to inexpensive semiconductors used in cars and home appliances to critical minerals for industrial processes including weapons production. The supply shock from drastically reducing or zeroing out imports from China, as Trump purports to want to achieve, would mean stagflation, the macroeconomic nightmare seen in the 1970s and during the COVID pandemic, when the economy shrank and inflation rose simultaneously. In such a situation, which may be closer at hand than many think, the Federal Reserve and fiscal policymakers are left with only terrible options and little chance of staving off unemployment except by further raising inflation.
This could all be intended as just a negotiating tactic, Trump’s and Bessent’s repeated statements and actions notwithstanding. But even on those terms, the strategy will do more harm than good. As I warned in Foreign Affairs last October, the fundamental problem with Trump’s economic approach is that it would need to carry out enough self-harming threats to be credible, which means that markets and households would expect ongoing uncertainty. Americans and foreigners alike would invest less rather than more in the U.S. economy, and they would no longer trust the U.S. government to live up to any deal, making a negotiated settlement or agreement to deescalate difficult to achieve. As a result, U.S. productive capacity would decline rather than improve, which would only increase the leverage that China and others have over the United States.
and china is already restricting exports of rare earths and minerals
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/13/business/china-rare-earths-exports.html
China has suspended exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets, threatening to choke off supplies of components central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world.Shipments of the magnets, essential for assembling everything from cars and drones to robots and missiles, have been halted at many Chinese ports while the Chinese government drafts a new regulatory system. Once in place, the new system could permanently prevent supplies from reaching certain companies, including American military contractors.
Shipments of the magnets, essential for assembling everything from cars and drones to robots and missiles, have been halted at many Chinese ports while the Chinese government drafts a new regulatory system. Once in place, the new system could permanently prevent supplies from reaching certain companies, including American military contractors.
― flopson, Sunday, 13 April 2025 21:13 (four months ago)
Yeah it's like putting out fires by now, you cover that one (tech, meds), the other one flares up (shipping, agriculture, oil), all the while having to pretend this little dance was not doomed from the beginning. When you think about it, he could have done that for an industry or two, gradually, moderately, the automotive industry probably - ISI is a real economic development theory after all, it was discussed in my masters program. It will be a minute before he finds scapegoats in his own advisers, and the various impacted industries don't have to be too smart to encourage it until they have peace. This tariff thing might be over before it has the time to do long-lasting damage: just enough to have the US barely avoiding a technical recession, to sour relationships with China for the rest of his term, widen the number of his enemies, and give them plenty of bullets.
― Naledi, Monday, 14 April 2025 06:48 (four months ago)
Interesting how US agriculture was harmed during the 1st trade war.
https://www.ft.com/content/3b101afd-b51c-4d64-ba2f-45ad4590e819
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 14 April 2025 08:48 (four months ago)
Tariff article; can’t read
― sarahell, Monday, 14 April 2025 14:28 (four months ago)
archive.ph = Hong-Kong
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 14 April 2025 15:06 (four months ago)
Communism is great.
Eggs are going for 4 yuan (about 50 cents) per dozen in a Chinese supermarket. But at what cost?? pic.twitter.com/XmLge66FUe— Kyle 🚄 (@KyleTrainEmoji) April 14, 2025
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 14 April 2025 15:25 (four months ago)
thought that was NYT Pitchbot for a sec
― sleeve, Monday, 14 April 2025 15:26 (four months ago)
Eggs are back down to $6 a dozen in my local supermarket. Hail Trump!
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Monday, 14 April 2025 15:27 (four months ago)
Probably not a big deal.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ford-halts-shipments-vehicles-china-183358401.html
― brownie, Friday, 18 April 2025 20:17 (four months ago)
This guy runs the biggest (only?) freight data news site, and has been a Trump supporter. But he says shipments are taking a big (sorry) dive. A lot of stuff is not being sent in either direction — which is bad news for the trucking/transport industry.
https://i.imgur.com/UhVcBaC.png
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Friday, 18 April 2025 22:30 (four months ago)
lol Trump's actually going to end up reducing carbon emissions.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Friday, 18 April 2025 22:31 (four months ago)
just heard an interview with a small board game company owner.. she said a container usually cost about a hundred grand to ship from China, but now will be $200K+ which they can't afford so the container is just sitting in a port in China
― Andy the Grasshopper, Friday, 18 April 2025 22:35 (four months ago)
This guy runs the biggest (only?) freight data news site, and has been a Trump supporter. But he says shipments are taking a big (sorry) dive. A lot of stuff is not being sent in either direction — which is bad news for the trucking/transport industry.🖼
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Friday, 18 April 2025 22:52 (four months ago)
I backed an rpg kickstarter a while back that was due to fulfill any time now and just got an update that (1) everything is printed and ready to go, (2) they aren't increasing the price; and (3) they are delaying fulfillment to an unknown date. This says to me they are banking on the tariffs being lifted at some point this year.
Board games are worse, because the components costs are going up way more than the printing costs.
― il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Saturday, 19 April 2025 00:19 (four months ago)
Let me guess, he supported Trump despite everything that Trump said he was going to do when he was an office?
I think that’s exactly right lol. I looked him up, he lobbied to be secretary of transportation, and he posts bitchy things about Sean Duffy being stupid. But he does seem to know his freight.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 19 April 2025 01:57 (four months ago)
this is insane
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/91e96152-cdc2-4128-ba0e-f9febc91dbb9_1060x834.png
― Tracer Hand, Sunday, 20 April 2025 12:35 (four months ago)
That is the effect of rewards/cashback card percolating down the stack of credit cards. Rather than competing on cost of debt the competition is on the miles or whatever. That only ever made sense if you paid your bill off in full every month. Now it’s just a loan sharking tool designed to trap people on unsustainable debt in order to board a plane 2 minutes earlier and maybe not have to gate check your bags.
― Ed, Sunday, 20 April 2025 13:31 (four months ago)
Ed otm
― trm (tombotomod), Sunday, 20 April 2025 14:09 (four months ago)
(3) they are delaying fulfillment to an unknown date. This says to me they are banking on the tariffs being lifted at some point this year.Yep very large corporations making hard goods in China are doing exactly the same.
― duolingo ate my baby (Jon not Jon), Sunday, 20 April 2025 14:18 (four months ago)
I wonder where the miles and miles of finished goods are being put for the moment
― duolingo ate my baby (Jon not Jon), Sunday, 20 April 2025 14:20 (four months ago)
Containers stacked in port facilities and on docked ships
― Jaq, Sunday, 20 April 2025 15:15 (four months ago)
Xp Ed — idk it seems like more people are being denied credit so the loan sharking aspect seems less uh bloodthirsty? Idk like people who need credit cards are getting denied … meanwhile, I am one of those pay the bills off in full 11 months out of the year people… I keep getting ads for every credit card it feels like, balance transfer low APR whatever cards and I am kinda baffled because they presumably have info about me, including the fact I don’t have any balances to transfer … am I supposed to tell a friend or something?
― sarahell, Sunday, 20 April 2025 15:28 (four months ago)
I actually need to transfer a balance to somewhere with no interest for 12-18 mos so I can get rid of the only debt i have. Annoyingly.
― Ima Gardener (in orbit), Sunday, 20 April 2025 15:31 (four months ago)
The fact that I have a bunch of stuff on autopay makes switching from the 1.5% rewards card to the 2% rewards card something that seems like too much effort
― sarahell, Sunday, 20 April 2025 15:32 (four months ago)
I am one of those pay the bills off in full 11 months out of the year people… I keep getting ads for every credit card it feels like, balance transfer low APR whatever cards and I am kinda baffled because they presumably have info about me, including the fact I don’t have any balances to transfer … am I supposed to tell a friend or something?
Same here. Pay the full balance every month, use the credit card to pay for internet and electricity and groceries and very little else, and yet I get emails and letters from Chase and American Express every goddamn week asking me to sign up for new credit cards, both in my personal name and corporate cards for Burning Ambulance. It's crazy.
If I wanted to, I'm pretty sure I could get a sizable business loan for BA — like a quarter million — and use part of it to get the fuck out of this country, but I don't think my wife would go for that plan. She's way more debt-averse than I am.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Sunday, 20 April 2025 15:59 (four months ago)
isn’t the reason interest rates on credit cards increased because interest rates increased? the spike in the chart tracer hand posted coincided with when the fed started hiking, and rates were rock bottom for over a decade prior
― flopson, Sunday, 20 April 2025 16:03 (four months ago)
― kendrick lamaze "to push a baby out" (m bison), Sunday, 20 April 2025 16:04 (four months ago)
The credit card companies want your balances even if you historically have paid them every month because all it takes is a pretty routine life change (medical emergency, lost job, etc.) and someone can no longer pay those balances in full. I'm sure they have data on how likely that is to happen.
― il lavoro mi rovina la giornata (PBKR), Sunday, 20 April 2025 16:11 (four months ago)
About a month back I signed up for something that at least purportedly is supposed to stop automatic mailouts of preapproved cards and stuff like that, the idea being to prevent fraud. Annoyingly I can't recall the info at present, was a free thing. It does seem to have dropped off for me at least.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 20 April 2025 16:40 (four months ago)
The card companies make money with every transaction (processing fees etc) so they are fine with folks who don't carry balances. There's money made by some entity every time money moves, so transfers are also more about churn.
― Jaq, Sunday, 20 April 2025 16:54 (four months ago)
Containers stacked in port facilities and on docked shipsYeah but on a scale previously undreamed of, surely
― duolingo ate my baby (Jon not Jon), Sunday, 20 April 2025 17:03 (four months ago)
Ho hum, Dow just down another 1,000 or so today.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Monday, 21 April 2025 17:04 (four months ago)
its only slightly above where it was at before Trump announced the 90 day pause. down nearly 10% in a month. I knew all the clips of FOX/CNBC morons celebrating getting to see "The Art of the Deal" in real time would age badly but I really didn't think it would happen so quickly.
― frogbs, Monday, 21 April 2025 17:37 (four months ago)
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/trump-tariffs-capitalism-global-us-economy-stock-market-wall-street.html
good read, reporter got some good sources for this
― 龜, Monday, 21 April 2025 19:39 (four months ago)
― flopson, Sunday, April 20, 2025 12:03 PM (yesterday)
it's not a 1:1 correlation though - fed cut rates to 0 during covid but the corresponding credit card interest rate didn't really dip to 2014 levels
― 龜, Monday, 21 April 2025 19:42 (four months ago)
Ha ive got thru half of that newyorker piece, the article is put together from takes by all hedge fund managers. Don’t make it wrong by any measure, but that is a particular set of “investors.” Hedge fund ime can mean anything really, but mostly it means you won’t really know what their investment strategy is or what and how they’re holding shit. That scaramucci is said to run a fund of funds in the group is itself pretty hilarious to me, i never thought if such a thing was even possible because it’s like the next level of randomosity. Volatility would be tempered because it’s grouping unknowns and ending up less volatile only by chaotic diversification? I dunno enough for sure so maybe i got wrong. Hedge funds can be incredibly predatory and are unpredictable, often close to being speculation by deep pockets. I don’t know what portion of wall st that is by money or population.
― Theodor W. Adorbso (Hunt3r), Monday, 21 April 2025 20:43 (four months ago)
something that drives me absolutely insane is this widely-spread perception that Trump would somehow be good for the economy. some of the more reasonable people I knew who voted for him used that as an excuse. outside of immigration it was the one issue voters consistently trusted him on. there were signs everywhere that said "KAMALA HIGH PRICES TRUMP LOW PRICES". and I always wanted to yell at these people, "HOW!??" he has no economic plan outside of "cut taxes on the rich", something which never works, and tariffs, which every economist on the planet knows will drive prices way up. he has no clue how the economy works on even a basic level and was a notoriously shitty businessman who made all his money through inheritance and fraud. all these Trump-voting stooges going "well I didn't think it would be *this* bad" can go fuck themselves. you sold your soul in service of this man and yet seem to have no idea how he actually works. I'm glad your portfolio is circling the fucking drain. sucks that mine is too though
― frogbs, Monday, 21 April 2025 21:27 (four months ago)
Literally any (other) actor who played a prominent businessman on TV would have done a better job.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Monday, 21 April 2025 21:33 (four months ago)
RIP Robert Chew
― sarahell, Monday, 21 April 2025 21:53 (four months ago)
it's not a 1:1 correlation though - fed cut rates to 0 during covid but the corresponding credit card interest rate didn't really dip to 2014 levels― 龜, Monday, 21 April 2025 15:42 (two hours ago) bookmarkflaglink
― 龜, Monday, 21 April 2025 15:42 (two hours ago) bookmarkflaglink
i was curious so i checked the correlation using data on FRED. the credit card series goes back to 1995. correlation is it’s 0.6
library(fredr)library(dplyr)fredr_set_key(fred_key)#Effective Federal Funds Rate (monthly average)effr =fredr( series_id = "EFFR", observation_start = as.Date("1995-01-01"), frequency = "m")#Credit Card Interest Rate (All Accounts)cc_rate = fredr( series_id = "TERMCBCCALLNS", observation_start = as.Date("1995-01-01")) %>% filter(is.na(value) == FALSE)merged_data = inner_join(effr, cc_rate, by = "date", suffix = c("_effr", "_cc"))cor(mfa ya$value_effr, data$value_cc)[1] 0.6044181
#Effective Federal Funds Rate (monthly average)effr =fredr( series_id = "EFFR", observation_start = as.Date("1995-01-01"), frequency = "m")
#Credit Card Interest Rate (All Accounts)cc_rate = fredr( series_id = "TERMCBCCALLNS", observation_start = as.Date("1995-01-01")) %>% filter(is.na(value) == FALSE)
merged_data = inner_join(effr, cc_rate, by = "date", suffix = c("_effr", "_cc"))cor(mfa ya$value_effr, data$value_cc)[1] 0.6044181
― flopson, Monday, 21 April 2025 22:28 (four months ago)
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.png?g=1IpDz&height=490" class="noborder">
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.png?g=1IpDL&height=490" class="noborder">
― flopson, Monday, 21 April 2025 22:30 (four months ago)
So... the San Francisco nonprofit I work for has a tiny staff in Canada. One departing Montreal employee just FedEx'd us her used laptop, and the international shipment cost a little over $200.
Then FedEx just sent us a separate bill for about $2300 for the tariff and a brokerage fees. This is a laptop that WE own, being returned to the mothership. Why the 125% tariff on a used laptop? Because this Dell laptop was made in CHINA, CHINA
I just saw customs paperwork and it comes from the Department of Homeland SecurityShit's getting real
― Andy the Grasshopper, Monday, 21 April 2025 23:48 (four months ago)
That is fucking wild
― FRAUDULENT STEAKS (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Monday, 21 April 2025 23:59 (four months ago)
We're gonna try to track down the original sales invoice and dispute it, but probably a shitload of red tape to actually get a refund
She should've just left it on the sidewalk with a 'FREE' sign taped to it
― Andy the Grasshopper, Tuesday, 22 April 2025 00:01 (four months ago)
lmao that’s wild
― flopson, Tuesday, 22 April 2025 00:02 (four months ago)
I wonder if all Trump's MAGA merchandise is going to find a way to avoid the tarriffs.
― imperial frfr (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 22 April 2025 03:12 (four months ago)
he doesn't care. he's huffing a different drug of choice
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Tuesday, 22 April 2025 03:14 (four months ago)
Wild story, and then you multiply that times 10,000...
― the way out of (Eazy), Tuesday, 22 April 2025 03:46 (four months ago)
honestly that story kind of reads like conservative fanfic, like the sort of thing you see getting posted around when there's a Democrat in office so they can go "can you believe how dumb our government is!??" except our government really is that dumb right now. ditto for the Hegseth stuff, like this is the kind of thing chuds kept insisting Hillary Clinton was doing but you knew even she couldn't get away with that. conservatives truly are manifesting the country they believed this was all along
― frogbs, Tuesday, 22 April 2025 04:24 (four months ago)
A good friend who manufactures in part in china and also in taiwan just got hit yest with his first huge tariff. Part of the high rate was a miscategorization of the item type. He was surprised tho how easy it was to get the categorization corrected and the tariff vastly reduced— like one call. Anecdotal evidence.
― Theodor W. Adorbso (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 22 April 2025 11:22 (four months ago)
xp Because Democrats in office are automaticly bad for business, according to some stupid folx.
― Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Tuesday, 22 April 2025 14:50 (four months ago)
That’s what I don’t get. Despite 40 years of tangible evidence that Republicans are bad at the economy, the median voter still thinks they’re the good ones.
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 22 April 2025 14:59 (four months ago)
they're all median temporarily embarrassed millionaires
― underminer of twenty years of excellent contribution to this borad (dan m), Tuesday, 22 April 2025 15:03 (four months ago)
we have the same problem over here with Tories.
― Nuts, whole hazelnuts (Tom D.), Tuesday, 22 April 2025 15:12 (four months ago)
So many people associate some kind of "being tough" with economic strength, military strength, strength in general. Which is a total misread of how economics, foreign relations, and the world at large really works. But it's deeply rooted in this kind of masculine mythology.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 22 April 2025 15:19 (four months ago)
They threaten the economy, grab it by the lapels and yell in its face: “Be good!!!”
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 22 April 2025 15:30 (four months ago)
They think “capitalism” is self-actualizing and requires no plan, design, or management. To the extent that it is self-actualizing, it is one of few charms. But it also arcs on its own towards monopoly, ruthless extraction, and selfish criminality (that’s when it hasn’t already started there and as a non-economist i’d say it probably does). Nevertheless , those “capitalist”ideologies insist on some imagined moral purity and fuck them forever.
― Theodor W. Adorbso (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 22 April 2025 15:40 (four months ago)
https://www.synthtopia.com/content/2025/04/21/drum-machine-price-before-tariffs-399-after-tariffs-977/
The pro-Trump comments in response to this are perfect. None of them had ever heard the phrase "trade deficit" before last month but now the cult leader has made it a hill they'd die on.
― papal hotwife (milo z), Tuesday, 22 April 2025 16:16 (four months ago)
Particularly fond of "tariffs increase wholesale prices, why are retail prices going up?????"
― papal hotwife (milo z), Tuesday, 22 April 2025 16:17 (four months ago)
Whole damn country of Homer Simpson’s
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 22 April 2025 16:55 (four months ago)
heading back to penny candy and nickle matinee days, good times ahead
WSJ: The Dow Jones Industrial Average shed almost 1,000 points on Monday and is headed for its worst April performance since 1932, according to Dow Jones Market Data.
― Andy the Grasshopper, Tuesday, 22 April 2025 18:38 (four months ago)
that means prices will be lower, right? *natalie portman meme*
― gestures broadly at...everything (voodoo chili), Tuesday, 22 April 2025 18:40 (four months ago)
But back up about 1,000 points today. People on Wall St. just moving money around.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 22 April 2025 19:04 (four months ago)
Yeah it’s all a scam
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Tuesday, 22 April 2025 19:27 (four months ago)
Math is fake
― sarahell, Wednesday, 23 April 2025 00:57 (four months ago)
if only it wasn't fucking with our savings as retired people
― Dan S, Wednesday, 23 April 2025 00:59 (four months ago)
It's starting to look like a Southern Gothic redneck version of the Incal 'round these parts. Did the Wild Palms reboot get green lit yet?
― earlnash, Wednesday, 23 April 2025 01:02 (four months ago)
I genuinely thought I was going to retire in a few years. Guess not!
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 01:56 (four months ago)
No market manipulation to see here
https://bsky.app/profile/emptywheel.bsky.social/post/3lni6msqq2k2g
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 12:59 (four months ago)
When I’m President for Life white collar crime will be treated like we treat the homeless now.
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 14:08 (four months ago)
nothing to see here, just laying down terms of safety nets/bailouts when the market collapses...
socialism for the rich is a different beast entirely
― imperial frfr (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 15:15 (four months ago)
seems like trump’s chickening out and is going back to his term 1 strategy of “do something, then undo it if stock market doesn’t like it.” unilaterally backing down from the trade war with china, bessent semi-publicly saying it’s not sustainable, trump backing off on firing powell after the markets didn’t like it
― flopson, Wednesday, 23 April 2025 15:17 (four months ago)
Trump still a clown, what a surprise.
― Nuts, whole hazelnuts (Tom D.), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 15:19 (four months ago)
somewhat comforting to know that the network speech can still put the fear of god in him
― gestures broadly at...everything (voodoo chili), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 15:44 (four months ago)
Is he going to make up a call with Xi to justify backing down? Last I saw he was still on ‘they want to make a deal but just don’t know how to reach out.’
― papal hotwife (milo z), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 16:01 (four months ago)
"One Trick Pony All Out of Tricks"
― fluffy tufts university (f. hazel), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 16:08 (four months ago)
he's so pathetic lol
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 23 April 2025 16:12 (four months ago)
could be a wait xxp
Thing I learned from @Lingling_Wei newsletter: "The only instance in recent memory when a Chinese leader initiated contact with an American leader occurred on Sept. 11, 2001, when then-President Jiang Zemin sent a telegram of condolence to George W. Bush" pic.twitter.com/3aX8nACSxH— modest proposal (@modestproposal1) April 22, 2025
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 16:12 (four months ago)
I'M DUMPING YOU - and don't even THINK about calling me!
I mean if you wanted to call me I wouldn't completely rule out talking about it. But YOU have to call ME.
.......Why isn't she picking up the phone???
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 23 April 2025 16:14 (four months ago)
This the art of the deal?
― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 23 April 2025 16:16 (four months ago)
The art of the dealt.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 23 April 2025 16:17 (four months ago)
The fart of the heel
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 16:18 (four months ago)
Median voter: “he’s soooooooo gooooood”
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 16:23 (four months ago)
3D chess baby!!
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 16:29 (four months ago)
No other president could have resolved this trade war with China.
― Nancy Makes Posts (sic), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 16:35 (four months ago)
Now when will he retract his totally bogus declaration of a national emergency that supposedly granted him the power to raise tariffs overnight? And all those other national emergencies he's used to seize dictatorial (essentially wartime) powers?
Maybe the stock market will recover for a while because all that money has to flow somewhere, but the underlying instability is ever present, because he's accumulated so much power to abuse and misuse, and has no intention of relinquishing it.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 16:43 (four months ago)
is repeatedly saying you aren't going back down on this, and then quite timidly climbing down with yr tail between yr legs - is this the artform of the deal?
― vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 16:47 (four months ago)
He learned all these tricks he loves so much while making real estate deals, negotiating licensing deals, getting loans, and negotiating other contracts. iow, situations where he only needed to dominate a relative handful of investors or executives. In that setting stuff like a sudden heel turn out of the blue, new crazy demands and the like probably worked, in part because they were confusing and intimidating and he was a billionaire. They've even worked pretty well on the Republicans in Congress, in part because Congress is a small group and not all that smart. They don't scale up to the level of global finance.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 17:06 (four months ago)
The herd is starting to grow restive
A majority of Americans disapprove of President Trump's handling of the economy, particularly his trade policies, per two new polls out Wednesday.Why it matters: Over 10 years in and around public office, and despite all the other controversies surrounding him, one issue where people have consistently given Trump the benefit of the doubt was in his handling of economic affairs.Not anymore.By the numbers: 55% of U.S. adults say they are not confident Trump can make good decisions about economic policy, per a Pew Research Center survey of 3,589 people conducted April 7-13.That's his lowest rating on that question in data going back to 2019, Pew said, and down 14 points from a survey conducted just after Trump's election last November."[W]hen it comes to the economy, Trump draws less confidence today than he did either in his first term or during the 2024 campaign," Pew said in a report.That followed another survey earlier Wednesday from Reuters/Ipsos, which found 37% of Americans approve of Trump's handling of the economy.That is Trump's worst-ever rating on the economic question in Reuters/Ipsos polling, going back to the start of his first presidency.It's also not far off the Biden administration's lowest numbers. Ipsos polled 4,306 people from April 16-21.The intrigue: Respondents in both polls took a dim view of Trump's sweeping efforts to remake the global economy via historic tariffs.Only 36% in the Ipsos survey said they approved of his performance on international trade, while just 39% in the Pew survey said they approved of his tariff increases.The bottom line: The U.S. economy isn't in a recession, and there's no guarantee that one will happen either. But pessimism that one might be coming is off the charts.New Gallup polling out this week shows that a majority of Americans, for the first time since at least 2001, believe their economic situation is worsening.
Why it matters: Over 10 years in and around public office, and despite all the other controversies surrounding him, one issue where people have consistently given Trump the benefit of the doubt was in his handling of economic affairs.
Not anymore.
By the numbers: 55% of U.S. adults say they are not confident Trump can make good decisions about economic policy, per a Pew Research Center survey of 3,589 people conducted April 7-13.
That's his lowest rating on that question in data going back to 2019, Pew said, and down 14 points from a survey conducted just after Trump's election last November.
"[W]hen it comes to the economy, Trump draws less confidence today than he did either in his first term or during the 2024 campaign," Pew said in a report.
That followed another survey earlier Wednesday from Reuters/Ipsos, which found 37% of Americans approve of Trump's handling of the economy.
That is Trump's worst-ever rating on the economic question in Reuters/Ipsos polling, going back to the start of his first presidency.
It's also not far off the Biden administration's lowest numbers. Ipsos polled 4,306 people from April 16-21.
The intrigue: Respondents in both polls took a dim view of Trump's sweeping efforts to remake the global economy via historic tariffs.
Only 36% in the Ipsos survey said they approved of his performance on international trade, while just 39% in the Pew survey said they approved of his tariff increases.
The bottom line: The U.S. economy isn't in a recession, and there's no guarantee that one will happen either. But pessimism that one might be coming is off the charts.
New Gallup polling out this week shows that a majority of Americans, for the first time since at least 2001, believe their economic situation is worsening.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 17:09 (four months ago)
and he was a billionaireprobably not
― Nancy Makes Posts (sic), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 17:23 (four months ago)
perception is reality if it remains untested
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 17:25 (four months ago)
Now when will he retract his totally bogus declaration of a national emergency that supposedly granted him the power to raise tariffs overnight?
his administration is gonna argue that trump being in office *is* the national emergency, so he does have that authority after all
― gestures broadly at...everything (voodoo chili), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 17:42 (four months ago)
Trump learnt not to mess with Capital.
Americans, minorities and migrants: no problem.
― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 23 April 2025 17:50 (four months ago)
Tariffs haven’t been cancelled yet, he could still be visited by the Ghost of Tariffs Past at midnight.
― papal hotwife (milo z), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 17:55 (four months ago)
China telling its airlines to stop ordering Boeing is pretty big... China withholding all exports of rare earth minerals to the U.S. is really big
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 23 April 2025 17:58 (four months ago)
Traders are choosing to interpret statements by Trump about not firing the Fed Chairman, and by the Treasury Secretary about the need to end the trade war with China, as if these were genuine changes of national policy instead of them simply saying what they think the markets want to hear, with no intention of resolving the chaos through decisive, coherent actions that align with those statements. Boy, will they be surprised when everything they say changes back again in a day or two. Then changes again the next day.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 18:03 (four months ago)
Meantimehttps://www.axios.com/2025/04/23/musk-bessent-trump-white-house-irs
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 23 April 2025 18:08 (four months ago)
(what's up with bullet point articles? does that mean they're probably written by AI?)
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 23 April 2025 18:15 (four months ago)
That’s just Axios’ house style. Obnoxious.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 18:18 (four months ago)
When you're the kind of (Self-)Important Person who reads Axios, you just want the bullet points. You're busy! No time for style or nuance! Just gimme the facts so I can repeat them in my next meeting!
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 18:50 (four months ago)
Axios articles are often almost unintelligible. Which is also their house stule. But i could gather, almost, that the people leading our nation are reqlly quite stupid after you get past their self-interested delusions.
― Theodor W. Adorbso (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 23 April 2025 20:05 (four months ago)
Or style
The Stule Council
― m0stly clean (Slowsquatch), Thursday, 24 April 2025 10:08 (four months ago)
When Trump eventually caves in and reduces the tariffs on China, I hope the Chinese say they don't give a fuck and keep their tariffs on the US in place.
― Nuts, whole hazelnuts (Tom D.), Thursday, 24 April 2025 10:46 (four months ago)
Trucking volumes down 8.3% month over month... We are approaching COVID low levels in trucking. The market continues to stall. pic.twitter.com/e5urKKWn3c— Craig Fuller 🛩🚛🚂⚓️ (@FreightAlley) April 24, 2025
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 24 April 2025 10:55 (four months ago)
The final art of the deal is that I'm chuckling at the idea that 45% of Americans in the second week of April still thought the president could make sound economic policy decisions. Where do they find those people. Or was there no "don't know / don't care / I'm here for the fun" option.
― Naledi, Thursday, 24 April 2025 11:41 (four months ago)
I only caught half of it on nhk news this evening but China seems to be turning out some really good exploding Tesla robot memes to win the trade war. So it’s not all masterly inactivity.
― Ed, Thursday, 24 April 2025 12:07 (four months ago)
It is indeed pretty unbelievable that 45% of Americans can think Trump is an economic genius, even after all this shit. Hard to get past the thought that the root problem is not Trump it's Americans.
― Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 24 April 2025 12:21 (four months ago)
I mean nowhere else in the western world does Trump's approval ratings get over 10 or 15%. There are upcoming elections in Canada and Australia, and literally the only reason the right wing parties are on course to lose is Trump, and people looking over to the US and thinking holy fuck no
― Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 24 April 2025 12:26 (four months ago)
In the UK we are ready for reform. In Germany AfD are big. In much of Europe the coalition system stops far right parties from gaining power for now.
Canadians will get bored of Carney and will boot any centre left party because most of the West are either racists or will vote for racists if they don't get their package on time. We are all screwed.
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 24 April 2025 12:29 (four months ago)
According to polls from November, people who would vote for Trump in Europe ranged from 4% (Denmark) to 13% (France, Germany) to 27% (UK) 33% (Greece). Obviously its very theoretical. When local right-wing people show up, those percentages go past 30% and sometimes end up in government.
― Naledi, Thursday, 24 April 2025 12:32 (four months ago)
jfc, it's still extremely despairing to imagine that circumstances are so dire that they have pushed a country to rally around Mark fucking Carney, just merely because of the extremely low bar that is not approving of Trump.
― vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Thursday, 24 April 2025 12:36 (four months ago)
Xpost to xyzzz: my very slightly more optimistic take is that while far right populism is definitely riding high in Europe, it may reach its high water mark soon, faced with Trump and Putin. The trussterfuck may have temporarily inoculated the UK from the truly moronic economic "policies" playing out in the US at the moment. And countries like France or Germany would never tolerate the gutting of government that's going on in the US right now. It's not much but it's something.
― Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 24 April 2025 12:49 (four months ago)
when Mark Carney was featured on the BBC Reith Lectures he was without doubt the most stupid, boring, intellectually vapid, greyer than a grey dogshit, Bill Gates foundation quoting. terminally dull neo-lib arsehole ever encountered since before VHS got banned from ILX.
― vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Thursday, 24 April 2025 12:50 (four months ago)
what's wrong with the gates foundation?
― jaymc, Thursday, 24 April 2025 12:54 (four months ago)
never mind, forget I asked
― jaymc, Thursday, 24 April 2025 12:55 (four months ago)
lol, are you serious?
― vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Thursday, 24 April 2025 12:56 (four months ago)
There's nothing good in politics right now, it's all bad vs worse, and if the choice is between some establishment neolib and a Trumpian fascist, I'm not going to assume equivalence.
― Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 24 April 2025 12:59 (four months ago)
What if the neolibs adopt fascist policies I mean a lot of this is already happening with immigration. In the UK lab is going to hemorrhage councilors next week and its not like that crowd need an excuse to stick the boot in.
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 24 April 2025 13:07 (four months ago)
yeah, it is better to judge their policies rather than their dire lyrics put in the public arena, but UK Labour are doing the hard-right fiscal and racist policies and the racist messaging. It's called sham democracy.
― vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Thursday, 24 April 2025 13:13 (four months ago)
I know the critiques, so I was being faux-naive. My perspective is that I work for an organization that partners with the Gates Foundation on lifesaving disease prevention around the world, and my wife also has experience helping to manage grant funding from Gates toward other worthy causes. Right now a lot of these causes are being directly threatened by the Trump administration, as is the nonprofit sector in general. So I don't have a lot of patience for dismissiveness toward the Gates Foundation and similar orgs that are engaged in impactful humanitarian work, even though I understand the problems with the role that Big Philanthropy plays in the world.
― jaymc, Thursday, 24 April 2025 13:15 (four months ago)
the prioritising of commercial vaccine IP over the life prospects of millions of humans in 3rd world = impactful. Yes I agree.
― vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Thursday, 24 April 2025 13:42 (four months ago)
can you guys take this to another thread?
― flopson, Thursday, 24 April 2025 13:42 (four months ago)
fair enough. I won't post another word on BGF or his pathetic melt apologists.
― vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Thursday, 24 April 2025 13:44 (four months ago)
thank you :)
― flopson, Thursday, 24 April 2025 13:45 (four months ago)
This thread is for the US economy but it is going to get into world economy and politics now and then, for reasons that ought to be obvious.
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 24 April 2025 14:02 (four months ago)
i’m not usually one to thread police but i’ll take any chance i can get to not be exposed to the hundredth reiteration of these tiresome beefs. there are multiple threads i dont read precisely to avoid seeing this kind of stuff. can we just have one thread without it?
― flopson, Thursday, 24 April 2025 14:08 (four months ago)
I was thinking the malevolent corporate evil of the Gates Foundation has probably already been thrashed to death on other threads by now.
― vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Thursday, 24 April 2025 14:12 (four months ago)
airlines one of the most cyclically sensitive sectors. one more thing to add to screaming recession indicators
American Airlines Group Inc. withdrew its full-year earnings outlook, joining a growing number of companies that say unease about the economy is making it difficult to forecast how the year will play out.The carrier said in a filing Thursday along with its first-quarter financial results that it plans to “provide a full-year update as the economic outlook becomes clearer.” In January, the company had projected adjusted earnings per share of $1.70 to $2.70 for the full year on a revenue gain of 4.5% to 7.5%.American’s action echoes those of Delta Air Lines Inc. and the parent of Frontier Airlines, which also pulled 2025 guidance as President Donald Trump’s trade war saps demand for travel. Waning confidence among consumers and businesses have “flat-lined” revenue growth, Delta said earlier this month. United Airlines Holdings Inc. took the unusual step last week of offering dual earnings forecasts, one for a stable environment and a reduced one based on a recession.
The carrier said in a filing Thursday along with its first-quarter financial results that it plans to “provide a full-year update as the economic outlook becomes clearer.” In January, the company had projected adjusted earnings per share of $1.70 to $2.70 for the full year on a revenue gain of 4.5% to 7.5%.
American’s action echoes those of Delta Air Lines Inc. and the parent of Frontier Airlines, which also pulled 2025 guidance as President Donald Trump’s trade war saps demand for travel. Waning confidence among consumers and businesses have “flat-lined” revenue growth, Delta said earlier this month. United Airlines Holdings Inc. took the unusual step last week of offering dual earnings forecasts, one for a stable environment and a reduced one based on a recession.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-24/american-air-aal-pulls-full-year-outlook-on-soft-travel-demand-worry
― flopson, Thursday, 24 April 2025 14:18 (four months ago)
it’s gonna be hilarious when trump unilaterally drops all tariffs on china in a couple weeks. amazing how much leverage he gave them, and continues to give, by doing this
China demanded that the US revoke all unilateral tariffs and denied there were talks on reaching a trade deal, maintaining a defiant stance despite President Donald Trump’s recent easing of criticism of the country.“The US should respond to rational voices in the international community and within its own borders and thoroughly remove all unilateral tariffs imposed on China, if it really wants to solve the problem,” Commerce Ministry spokesman He Yadong said at a regular briefing on Thursday in Beijing.He also dismissed speculation that progress has been made in bilateral communications, saying “any reports on development in talks are groundless,” and urging the US to “show sincerity” if it wants to make a deal.The remarks suggest that President Donald Trump’s comments this week signaling that he could lower tariffs on China — which currently stand at 145% for most goods — will not be enough to de-escalate tensions. The US leader said Wednesday that “everything’s active” when asked if he was engaging with China and that Beijing was “going to do fine” once talks had settled.Trump has tried to get President Xi Jinping on the phone a number of times since he returned to office, but the Chinese leader has, so far, resisted.
“The US should respond to rational voices in the international community and within its own borders and thoroughly remove all unilateral tariffs imposed on China, if it really wants to solve the problem,” Commerce Ministry spokesman He Yadong said at a regular briefing on Thursday in Beijing.
He also dismissed speculation that progress has been made in bilateral communications, saying “any reports on development in talks are groundless,” and urging the US to “show sincerity” if it wants to make a deal.
The remarks suggest that President Donald Trump’s comments this week signaling that he could lower tariffs on China — which currently stand at 145% for most goods — will not be enough to de-escalate tensions. The US leader said Wednesday that “everything’s active” when asked if he was engaging with China and that Beijing was “going to do fine” once talks had settled.
Trump has tried to get President Xi Jinping on the phone a number of times since he returned to office, but the Chinese leader has, so far, resisted.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-24/pboc-s-pan-warns-trade-frictions-threaten-trust-in-world-economy
― flopson, Thursday, 24 April 2025 14:23 (four months ago)
ouch feels bad
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 24 April 2025 14:27 (four months ago)
https://preview.redd.it/gj5enhovvpi91.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=af593189f1c63ff02fda5e9e81912d7f909881f8
― 龜, Thursday, 24 April 2025 14:37 (four months ago)
the meme of the next decade
― vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Thursday, 24 April 2025 14:49 (four months ago)
Xi not taking Trump's phone calls is ice cold. Trump trying multiple times after the first rejection is what you might call a big clue to who has the upper hand. Would love to have a Xi spokesperson tell Trump "he's not holding any cards", as Trump famously told Zelensky.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, 24 April 2025 16:06 (four months ago)
― flopson, Thursday, 24 April 2025 bookmarkflaglink
As politics get worse ILE will become more unreadable.
Ride it out, is what I say.
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 24 April 2025 16:33 (four months ago)
xxp
and the card he has is worthless to china
Oxford Economics estimates the difference in hit to China's economy between 60% tariffs and 145% is only 2% vs 2.2% because both are so punitive pic.twitter.com/JRLkIsH84n— modest proposal (@modestproposal1) April 24, 2025
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, 24 April 2025 16:47 (four months ago)
What do you do when you only have One Big Beautiful Idea and it turns out to be completely wrong? The ongoing education of DJT.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 24 April 2025 16:52 (four months ago)
― Zelda Zonk, Thursday, April 24, 2025 7:21 AM (five hours ago) bookmarkflaglink
Let’s be honest, that last sentence is really the thing.
― Clever Message Board User Name (Raymond Cummings), Thursday, 24 April 2025 17:37 (four months ago)
Hard to get past the thought that the root problem is not Trump it's Americans.
https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:22gl4rbpkgcoxytuhphhqofi/bafkreiaylghujq5boqijg75quqcvoww4dgkfbmynj7u7ebqemj7naxgqya@jpeg
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 24 April 2025 18:09 (four months ago)
what is that poll supposed to signify?
― treeship., Thursday, 24 April 2025 18:19 (four months ago)
personally I wouldn't publish the fact that 9% of your respondants said they had a favorable opinion of the Black Plague
― frogbs, Thursday, 24 April 2025 18:20 (four months ago)
From the same freight data guy I cited earlier in the thread.
https://i.imgur.com/PYxnBqo.png
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 24 April 2025 18:26 (four months ago)
Deadheads going to Dallas to get loaded? Count me in
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 24 April 2025 18:30 (four months ago)
lol my thoughts exactly
― sleeve, Thursday, 24 April 2025 18:32 (four months ago)
in all seriousness tho, this is very bad
I bought a new large lithium battery yesterday, and just today I was told all prices are increasing
― sleeve, Thursday, 24 April 2025 18:33 (four months ago)
lol Andy
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 24 April 2025 18:35 (four months ago)
no one knows whether gregorian chant is good or not. checks out
― ciderpress, Thursday, 24 April 2025 18:43 (four months ago)
“We wanna truck freight, we wanna truck freight to do what we wanna do! And we wanna get loaded. And we wanna have a good time. And that’s what we’re gonna do. We’re gonna have a good time. We’re gonna be deadheads!”
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 24 April 2025 19:00 (four months ago)
when trump says trade talks with China are 'underway,' can we just assume it's a blatant lie? China says no talks are underway and I tend to trust them more
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 24 April 2025 19:03 (four months ago)
Definitely getting a António de Oliveira Salazar post-stroke "Just set him up with an office where he thinks he's doing things" vibe.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 24 April 2025 19:08 (four months ago)
they could have done that from the start and he would've been hailed as a hero
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Thursday, 24 April 2025 19:09 (four months ago)
Convincing
The US and China held talks on Thursday morning to help resolve an ongoing trade war, Donald Trump said.The US president told reporters at the White House on Thursday, declining to say to whom he was referring. “It doesn’t matter who ‘they’ is. We may reveal it later, but they had meetings this morning, and we’ve been meeting with China.”
The US president told reporters at the White House on Thursday, declining to say to whom he was referring. “It doesn’t matter who ‘they’ is. We may reveal it later, but they had meetings this morning, and we’ve been meeting with China.”
― Kim Kimberly, Thursday, 24 April 2025 19:14 (four months ago)
he's fucking lying.. he lies like the rest of us breathe
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 24 April 2025 19:16 (four months ago)
They did that to Fred Trump when he had dementia. Sent him to the office and have him blank paper to sign.
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 24 April 2025 19:16 (four months ago)
He had a meeting with all one billion Chinese.
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 24 April 2025 19:17 (four months ago)
it was a pretty unruly zoom call, it's true
― sleeve, Thursday, 24 April 2025 19:30 (four months ago)
the thing with Trump is he's not exactly a wild card in fact he's actually very predictable and easy to manipulate in some ways. he wants to act tough but doesn't actually want to *be* tough. because being tough is hard work and at his core he's a fundamentally lazy and incurious man who is completely uninterested in any part of the job that doesn't involve being on TV. after a decade of this shit he's still unable to adequately explain a single thing about any US policy, he either lies through his teeth or gets everything horribly wrong. long story short the one tactic that works really well on him is to just tell him to go fuck himself. he doesn't have the conviction or the knowledge to fight for anything. even at his own felony trial he was constantly falling asleep. his only tool is to be a whiny bitch. feel like every country on the planet knows this and the next four years is gonna be everyone eating our lunch.
― frogbs, Thursday, 24 April 2025 19:56 (four months ago)
Gregorian chant obviously good, wake up America!
― Nuts, whole hazelnuts (Tom D.), Thursday, 24 April 2025 20:10 (four months ago)
Congress is trying again to eliminate the Estate tax …
― sarahell, Thursday, 24 April 2025 20:14 (four months ago)
We may reveal it later
i saw him say that and could not believe nobody in the room coughed the words "Bullshit"
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 24 April 2025 20:16 (four months ago)
it is actually pretty wild how often Trump is able to get away with that, I don't know if I've ever seen someone who is so obviously full of shit 95% of the time. and yet trillions of dollars worth of value are being gained and lost based on that shit. fucking incredible country we've built.
― frogbs, Thursday, 24 April 2025 20:40 (four months ago)
how has there not been one reporter that we've heard just call straight bullshit to his face?
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 24 April 2025 21:04 (four months ago)
they want to believe
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Thursday, 24 April 2025 21:12 (four months ago)
Reporters that call him on his bullshit never get asked again
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 24 April 2025 21:25 (four months ago)
I must have missed when they tried
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Thursday, 24 April 2025 21:30 (four months ago)
there was the exchange with kaitlan collins during the bukele meeting 10 days ago, but apparently it's impossible to find an upload of that video that isn't framed as "trump DESTROYS CNN journalist"
― c u (crüt), Thursday, 24 April 2025 21:45 (four months ago)
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 24 April 2025 22:00 (four months ago)
a lower population freeing up space for everyone
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 24 April 2025 22:12 (four months ago)
Surely my buboes are benign
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 24 April 2025 23:07 (four months ago)
sad that vikings are sorta 'meh'... they should have elicited a stronger response, that was the whole point
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 24 April 2025 23:21 (four months ago)
TRUMP ASKED IF CHINA'S XI CALLED HIM, RESPONDS 'YEP'— *Walter Bloomberg (@DeItaone) April 25, 2025
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 25 April 2025 14:44 (four months ago)
classic *walter
― c u (crüt), Friday, 25 April 2025 14:54 (four months ago)
Love his photo there: it’s late night and I’m trying not to disturb the others in the group home
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Friday, 25 April 2025 15:03 (four months ago)
xps
sorry to hear about your loss PK :(
― vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Friday, 25 April 2025 15:35 (four months ago)
wrong thread obv - meant for the US pol one, but post still stands
― vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Friday, 25 April 2025 15:38 (four months ago)
https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_fullsize/plain/did:plc:5masqigebv6augvgz62uko5i/bafkreifjq5hip42cqomlcc345bcntds3dc4ehb2wmockkdh565cvvlzdkm@jpeg
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 25 April 2025 15:43 (four months ago)
"you wouldn't know any of the countries I've made deals with, they all live in Canada"
― henry s, Friday, 25 April 2025 15:46 (four months ago)
NYT:
Speaking to reporters outside the White House on Friday morning, the president reiterated that he had spoken with the Chinese president “numerous times,” but he refused to answer when pressed on whether any call had happened after he imposed the tariffs earlier this month.[...]But his claims of talks have been rejected by Chinese officials, who have repeatedly denied this week that they are actively negotiating with the United States.“China and the U.S. have not held consultations or negotiations on the issue of tariffs,” Guo Jiakun, the spokesman for the foreign ministry, said in a news conference on Friday. “The United States should not confuse the public.”
[...]
But his claims of talks have been rejected by Chinese officials, who have repeatedly denied this week that they are actively negotiating with the United States.
“China and the U.S. have not held consultations or negotiations on the issue of tariffs,” Guo Jiakun, the spokesman for the foreign ministry, said in a news conference on Friday. “The United States should not confuse the public.”
― Kim Kimberly, Friday, 25 April 2025 15:55 (four months ago)
Mr. Trump also said, without evidence, that he had “made 200 deals.” He added that he would finish and announce them in the next three to four weeks.
lol he definitely is signing blank papers
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Friday, 25 April 2025 15:57 (four months ago)
nominating "The United States should not confuse the public." for May USPol thread title...
― m0stly clean (Slowsquatch), Friday, 25 April 2025 15:58 (four months ago)
― sleeve, Friday, 25 April 2025 16:02 (four months ago)
yes
― generalism specialist (WmC), Friday, 25 April 2025 16:23 (four months ago)
He added that he would finish and announce them in the next three to four weeks
like when he was replacing Obamacare with something so much better in his first term.. it was always a couple more weeks to finalize the plan, then a couple more
― Andy the Grasshopper, Friday, 25 April 2025 16:57 (four months ago)
This explains much
https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:z6rujpf4u56jfie7aqic2nfg/bafkreidsbbpmjweds42div76d5fpx5kshkyauce64tkztjsqjsbhfucacm@jpeg
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 26 April 2025 15:18 (four months ago)
Gonna be great!
https://fortune.com/2025/04/25/albertsons-suppliers-tariffs-price-cost/
Such genius:
https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:z6rujpf4u56jfie7aqic2nfg/bafkreiaf2iz3pho4rczn5wcjsa7xv6woexyctttxkzuydszi62bf7tvjni@jpeg
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 April 2025 14:03 (three months ago)
Actually I can see that he’s setting up to blame retailers if there are shortages. Stupid, but makes some sort of sense.
― Kung Fu Gift Shop (Boring, Maryland), Monday, 28 April 2025 14:48 (three months ago)
grocery stores should pre-order bananas and avocados
― gestures broadly at...everything (voodoo chili), Monday, 28 April 2025 14:49 (three months ago)
xp - Are those lawn signs of people they've arrested? wtf.
― better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 28 April 2025 14:50 (three months ago)
Hope u like *checks fields* nothing
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 28 April 2025 14:50 (three months ago)
The port of Seattle right now. It's completely empty with no new ships coming in. We're going to have disruptions to access of basic goods unlike anything we have ever experienced in our lifetimes.
We're going to have disruptions to access of basic goods unlike anything we have ever experienced in our lifetimes.
https://bsky.app/profile/esqueer.net/post/3lnvjtgcxo22e
― sleeve, Monday, 28 April 2025 20:02 (three months ago)
We are so unbelievably fucked. Most have no idea. Sadly, I don't even think empty shelves at Wal-Mart will get the cult to admit dear leader owns this one.
― better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 28 April 2025 20:08 (three months ago)
We have failed the dear leader, we must apologize to him for not having toilet paper
― Kung Fu Gift Shop (Boring, Maryland), Monday, 28 April 2025 20:13 (three months ago)
I have a .22, I'll be opossum hunting and foraging for a mess of wild mustard greens... make america gaunt again
― Andy the Grasshopper, Monday, 28 April 2025 20:22 (three months ago)
I'll take the end of the US as the global hegemon and dollar as the reserve currency if Chinese tablets become even cheaper. Not trolling here, just saying this from the perspective of someone from a wretched, absolutely fucking cursed US vassal state shithole.
― vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Monday, 28 April 2025 20:25 (three months ago)
Heard today that wal mart is resuming shipments having agreed to eat the tariff cost themselves. No idea if true.
― duolingo ate my baby (Jon not Jon), Monday, 28 April 2025 20:52 (three months ago)
To say that Trump and the minions are desperately spinning the GDP numbers today is, how you say, understating.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 April 2025 15:05 (three months ago)
we are doing great if you ignore the tariffs, which are going to supercharge the economy and make us all rich very soon!
https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3lnzwqewxju2r
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 15:07 (three months ago)
Why I feel better already!
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 April 2025 15:08 (three months ago)
"If you ignore the raging fire that is currently rapidly consuming the entire first floor, we've got ourselves a lovely house with a great market value for resale!"
― better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 15:12 (three months ago)
The thing is, the number is mostly depressed by tariff panic-buying pushing up imports. Assuming the tariffs have the expected effect of a big import drop-off in the 2nd quarter, absent other shocks there will probably be a big jump up in 2nd quarter allowing Trump to proclaim that his boom has arrived. When all that will really mean is that he artificially depressed GDP and then artificially boosted it via trade policy.
But that nuance is going to be hard to get across to yr average bear.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 15:18 (three months ago)
pretty optimistic assuming we'll survive another 3 months
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 15:20 (three months ago)
I have tickets for concerts in September and November that I really wanna see, so I'm invested in the future!
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 15:21 (three months ago)
Hell we just yesterday put down payments to be part of a parade in New Orleans next February, that's how bullish I am.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 15:22 (three months ago)
My current employment contract expires in three weeks. That's how far into the future I can see.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 15:27 (three months ago)
Assuming some of Stereolab's lyrics will hit harder in October.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 April 2025 15:28 (three months ago)
it's a real problem that this is perpetually the case
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 15:30 (three months ago)
I'm still a "Stereolab predicted 9/11" truther
Yeah, I'm either optimistic or dumb enough to have just bought tickets for a show in late September.
― better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 15:31 (three months ago)
I figure the more shows you can buy in advance now the less immediate angst you'd face on waiting and then wondering if you have the cash for it closer to the time. Which sounds flippant but isn't meant to be!
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 April 2025 15:43 (three months ago)
Man I bought a National Symphony subscription into June 2026 I hope DC isn’t a smoking crater then.
― Kung Fu Gift Shop (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 15:49 (three months ago)
So if c. the US election the economy looked great on paper, but didn't feel good for so many people, will the inverse hold true in the near future? That the economy will look bad on paper, but many of those same people will insist it's good?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 30 April 2025 15:52 (three months ago)
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 15:56 (three months ago)
Consumer confidence is in the toilet and we haven't even been hit by tariff inflation yet.
― papal hotwife (milo z), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 16:02 (three months ago)
Looks like the only economies with negative growth, out of those announced today, are the USA and Hungary. Fascism doesn't work, folks.
― Blake the Messenger (Tom D.), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 16:06 (three months ago)
― sleeve, Wednesday, 30 April 2025 16:08 (three months ago)
Shipping from Asia to the US expected to drop 35% next week...
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 16:10 (three months ago)
Reuters link
The Los Angeles port is expecting a 35% drop in cargo from Asia next week, Gene Seroka, the port's executive director, said in a CNBC interview on Tuesday."It's a precipitous drop in volume with a number of major American retailers stopping all shipments from China based on the tariffs," Seroka said.Major American retailers have now stopped all shipments from China and that contributes to around 45% of traffic in Los Angeles, he said.Seroka said that until some accord or framework is reached with China, the volume coming out of the country, except for some commodities, would be very light at best.
"It's a precipitous drop in volume with a number of major American retailers stopping all shipments from China based on the tariffs," Seroka said.
Major American retailers have now stopped all shipments from China and that contributes to around 45% of traffic in Los Angeles, he said.
Seroka said that until some accord or framework is reached with China, the volume coming out of the country, except for some commodities, would be very light at best.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 16:13 (three months ago)
Fascism doesn't work, folks.
Fascism doesn't work on behalf of ordinary people. But it works as it is intended to work: to exert maximum control over ordinary people.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 17:20 (three months ago)
Ah yes
https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:z6rujpf4u56jfie7aqic2nfg/bafkreifly4zukbggjiazrbjz4pzmspbfh32tcy5imqvk7sy2yu7tdemeve@jpeg
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 April 2025 18:55 (three months ago)
https://theonion.com/trump-informs-nation-they-better-start-liking-those-little-canned-wieners/
― Kung Fu Gift Shop (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 19:00 (three months ago)
corn husk dolls making a comeback
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 30 April 2025 19:06 (three months ago)
One of the first inductees to the Toy Hall of Fame was: stick
https://www.museumofplay.org/toys/stick/
― zydecodependent (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 30 April 2025 20:05 (three months ago)
this sucks for the employees but you kinda wonder if they're just using this all as an excuse
The United Parcel Service (UPS) is expected to cut about 20,000 jobs in 2025 as a part of a larger plan to reduce costs and increase profit, citing “changes in the global trade policy and new or increased tariffs”.
UPS announced the layoffs on Tuesday in its first quarter earnings report. The parcel delivery service said it made consolidated revenues of $21.5bn, compared with $21.7bn about the same time a year ago. Additionally, the company said it would be shuttering 73 leased and owned buildings by the end of June of this year.
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 1 May 2025 00:54 (three months ago)
it's mostly a convenient excuse to shift responsibility elsewhere for something they were planning to do soon anyway
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, 1 May 2025 01:00 (three months ago)
yeah, exactly.. like how tech layoffs happen in waves, due to the 'changing landscape'.. sometimes it's cutting jobs that weren't even filled, so they can show shareholders they're trimming the fatNot sure if that's the case here
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 1 May 2025 01:04 (three months ago)
$21.5 billion vs $21.7 billion doesn't really seem like a dramatic change in fortunes
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 1 May 2025 01:07 (three months ago)
UPS announced some of those layoffs months ago because of changes to their Amazon deal I think.
― papal hotwife (milo z), Thursday, 1 May 2025 01:09 (three months ago)
Yeah it was in the works for months … they want to add value for their shareholders
― sarahell, Thursday, 1 May 2025 01:44 (three months ago)
Spooked by Trade Wars, Trump Officials Hoard Supplies: ‘It Would Be Stupid Not To!’
― Kim Kimberly, Thursday, 1 May 2025 18:42 (three months ago)
https://www.axios.com/2025/05/01/xbox-price-increase-trump-tariffs-microsoft
― sleeve, Thursday, 1 May 2025 20:13 (three months ago)
First time I've ever seen a four year old video game console becoming an appreciating asset.
― better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 1 May 2025 20:26 (three months ago)
What is it with these people and toilet paper?
― sarahell, Thursday, 1 May 2025 22:03 (three months ago)
they're full of shit
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 1 May 2025 22:13 (three months ago)
They think bidets make you gay.
― papal hotwife (milo z), Thursday, 1 May 2025 22:40 (three months ago)
fuck joe bidet he was the wors woke ass fiol
― Theodor W. Adorbso (Hunt3r), Thursday, 1 May 2025 22:42 (three months ago)
Bloomberg interview with the executive director of the Port of Los Angeles. We are fucked.
https://bsky.app/profile/paleofuture.bsky.social/post/3loetuvp7gk2q
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Monday, 5 May 2025 02:22 (three months ago)
YouTube link for those disinclined to click through to Bluesky:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdGzwetSLaE
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Monday, 5 May 2025 02:26 (three months ago)
A response to the Port of LA director interview:
I spent 17 years pulling freight off the L.A. docks and brokering intermodal freight. It’s VERY bad. Especially for dock workers, truck drivers, and any company (and their employees) getting raw materials from China. And all those people have debts.
The Port guy also cited CA central valley agra-business, where the basic inputs like fertilizer are going to be in shortage and also far more costly.
In some ways the business press are the only journalists willing to spell out Trump's disastrous policies. Just wait, if the mass deportations become reality instead of ugly threats to cow immigrant workers, then the business world is going to raise another big stink. Trump's hardcore base won't care, but independents and legacy Chamber of Commerce Republicans are going to cry foul. As the saying goes, a hit dog yelps.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Monday, 5 May 2025 02:49 (three months ago)
the port of LA is such a slick tv sports presence that I assumed he's basically full of shit but this guy I follow who looks like hank from breaking bad says he's legit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43VMteILGOI
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 5 May 2025 14:37 (three months ago)
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the Trump administration still has not engaged in trade negotiations with China, contradicting previous claims from President Donald Trump that the U.S. is talking to Beijing about tariffs."China we have not engaged in negotiations with as of yet," Bessent told the House Appropriations Committee at a May 6 hearing.
"China we have not engaged in negotiations with as of yet," Bessent told the House Appropriations Committee at a May 6 hearing.
― Kim Kimberly, Tuesday, 6 May 2025 18:09 (three months ago)
Some groyper interns called the big guy up and put on comedy Asian accents
― Kung Fu Gift Shop (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 6 May 2025 18:28 (three months ago)
sorry, I'm seeing Hector here
― frogbs, Tuesday, 6 May 2025 19:00 (three months ago)
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2025/05/06/trump-tariffs-trade-canada-china.html
After weeks of touting how many countries were asking for bilateral trade talks with the United States, the president and his team have yet to announce any formal agreements or frameworks."I wish they'd ... stop asking, how many deals are you signing this week?" said Trump, clearly frustrated at the mounting pressure on the White House to show progress on trade talks. "Because one day we'll come and we'll give you 100 deals," he said.[...] Trump blamed top aides like Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick for overpromising trade deals.
"I wish they'd ... stop asking, how many deals are you signing this week?" said Trump, clearly frustrated at the mounting pressure on the White House to show progress on trade talks. "Because one day we'll come and we'll give you 100 deals," he said.
[...] Trump blamed top aides like Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick for overpromising trade deals.
― Kim Kimberly, Tuesday, 6 May 2025 19:12 (three months ago)
Needs a little Vito Corleone fluorish in there: "Because one day--and that day may never come--we'll come and we'll give you 100 deals."
― clemenza, Tuesday, 6 May 2025 19:17 (three months ago)
Trump blamed top aides like Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick for overpromising trade deals
― Theodor W. Adorbso (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 6 May 2025 19:20 (three months ago)
??? Didn't Trump himself tell Time magazine that he'd already made 200 deals?
― jaymc, Tuesday, 6 May 2025 19:39 (three months ago)
You have to understand, I'm dealing with all the companies, very friendly countries. We're meeting with China. We're doing fine with everybody. But ultimately, I've made all the deals.Not one has been announced yet. When are you going to announce them?I’ve made 200 deals. You’ve made 200 deals?100%.
Not one has been announced yet. When are you going to announce them?
I’ve made 200 deals.
You’ve made 200 deals?
100%.
― Kim Kimberly, Tuesday, 6 May 2025 19:44 (three months ago)
https://www.google.com/search?q=number+of+countires+in+the+wqorld
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 6 May 2025 19:48 (three months ago)
you don't even need to spell it right to figure it out
I am a fact checker for the Washington Post and give Trump’s statement one “oopsiedaisy” since I think Trump needs the benefit of the doubt
― Kung Fu Gift Shop (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 6 May 2025 19:54 (three months ago)
Thank you, BezosBot48312
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 6 May 2025 20:09 (three months ago)
The Art of the Blame: how to lie about everything without ever facing consequences.
― BrianB, Tuesday, 6 May 2025 20:35 (three months ago)
I missed this last week but we talk anywhere about Lutnick’s vision of endless factory work for everyone fixing robots forever?
“This is the new model, where you work in these plants for the rest of your life, and your kids work here, and your grandkids work here.”
While Lutnick said this is all part of President Trump’s larger plan to make America more independent from foreign imports and services, the administration’s targeted deportation of immigrants has left many domestic manufacturers scrambling for labor. To keep up with supply, people have to fill the plant jobs, and Lutnick thinks technicians tending to factory robots are the next hot gig.
“You gotta remember these plants, all these automated arms and stuff, they need to be fixed. They all need a technician to fix them,” he said. “This is tradecraft, this is high school-educated, great jobs.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-secretary-commerce-says-model-172111761.html
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 6 May 2025 21:02 (three months ago)
You don’t need no college kid, c’mon down and oil the tin men.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 6 May 2025 21:04 (three months ago)
I was trying to figure the numbers on that. Like 3 million kids graduate high school every year and I assume we're not maintaining a 1:1 robot:technician ratio. So we need... 15 million new robots a year? 10 for every other high school graduate.
― Lady Sovereign (Citizen) (milo z), Tuesday, 6 May 2025 21:09 (three months ago)
Lutnick literally is living in the 19th Century
― Kung Fu Gift Shop (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 6 May 2025 21:20 (three months ago)
These people don't think before they talk.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Tuesday, 6 May 2025 22:12 (three months ago)
Considering the people they're talking to, careful forethought is not a prerequisite.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Tuesday, 6 May 2025 22:17 (three months ago)
I dunno, I think he's just explaining the actual vision. Large permanent wage-slave class, small ruling elite owning almost all the wealth and property. It's essentially Metropolis. (Maybe someone showed that to Trump.)
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 6 May 2025 22:21 (three months ago)
Well that’s the history of capitalism
― Kung Fu Gift Shop (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 6 May 2025 22:43 (three months ago)
manually shelling nuts in the tenement was a great way for the whole family to work together, no need for some fancy diploma
https://www.artnet.com/WebServices/images/ll00067lld2OFJFgneECfDrCWvaHBOc29tE/lewis-hine-tenement-home-work,-n.-y.-city-(shelling-nuts).jpg
― Andy the Grasshopper, Tuesday, 6 May 2025 22:58 (three months ago)
my roommate is probably getting reduced hours soon bc the tariffs are affecting the small batch food business he works for’s ability to acquire jars and ingredients. also people aren’t buying anything rn
imo the economy is dead he killed it
― ivy., Wednesday, 7 May 2025 01:07 (three months ago)
The parking lot at grocery outlet was fuller yesterday than last week. This should be an official economic indicator imo
― sarahell, Wednesday, 7 May 2025 21:52 (three months ago)
Really should!
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 7 May 2025 21:54 (three months ago)
where else can you get Sweet & Sour Cheerios with 2020 Summer Olympics branding
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 7 May 2025 21:56 (three months ago)
I think those are gone now.
― sarahell, Thursday, 8 May 2025 18:09 (three months ago)
today at work:
Hello,
Unfortunately, we will need to update the ship date for (redacted). The logistics and tariff issues related to the current political climate have put us in a bind with this product.
We were expecting restock to arrive in port on 5/20; due to shipping issues they are now slated to arrive and be ready to ship to you on 6/9-6/13.
The items have been made; it is just a matter of getting them to the US. We are in conversation with the factory and looking into possible airfreight, however due to all that is transpiring in trade and logistics the cost of airfreight may be astronomical.
If they ship by boat, they will be leaving China next week. Typically, it takes about three weeks for items to arrive. IF the ports are slow but still staffed sufficiently, hopefully the items clear customs faster than normal.
We will let you know if anything changes as far as estimated ship date.
We realize this puts your customer in a bind and therefore causes issues for you. We appreciate you and your customers' patience while we navigate this new trade landscape.
― sleeve, Thursday, 8 May 2025 20:20 (three months ago)
yeah... at (redacted) we stopped all shipments of finished goods a couple of weeks ago, containers upon containers of product are staged somewhere or other while we try to wait this out.
― duolingo ate my baby (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 8 May 2025 21:04 (three months ago)
i guess for goods that were already on the water when the call was made, we'll just be eating the 145%. Thankfully I am not on the supply chain team
― duolingo ate my baby (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 8 May 2025 21:05 (three months ago)
oof that's brutal
― sleeve, Thursday, 8 May 2025 21:07 (three months ago)
Meanwhile one of the pieces of the proposed tax bill involves 100% expensing for “factory structures” (as opposed to depreciating them over a 39 year period) … but for me, that raises the question… how is a “factory structure” defined? Can it be a building that isn’t currently a factory but the intent is to convert it? Can it be a building that had been a factory but the buyer is actually going to convert it into luxury condos?
― sarahell, Thursday, 8 May 2025 21:25 (three months ago)
6 floors of luxury condosground floor: a Build-A-Bearboom, factory structure
― duolingo ate my baby (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 8 May 2025 21:28 (three months ago)
Pretty sure every new business going forward will be some kind of factory, Bagel Factory, Kebab Factory, etc.
― henry s, Thursday, 8 May 2025 21:33 (three months ago)
Factory Factory
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 8 May 2025 21:33 (three months ago)
now we're talkin'
― sleeve, Thursday, 8 May 2025 21:33 (three months ago)
Factory Records
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 8 May 2025 21:40 (three months ago)
Can get my kitchen redone maybe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEwk6yWVyjQ
― Bangel, Bangel & Bangel (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 8 May 2025 21:56 (three months ago)
Finally, our once-proud cheesecake industry will come roaring back to life.
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 8 May 2025 22:38 (three months ago)
see also: C&C Music
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 8 May 2025 23:17 (three months ago)
Private prisons
― sarahell, Friday, 9 May 2025 01:08 (three months ago)
https://www.ft.com/content/4d7892b3-ec07-4ae9-ae93-dcd34ad42c5b
“We are having an internal debate on US exceptionalism and whether we reduce US allocations,” said one investor. “Experience says that you need to be careful with these shifts and that betting against the US hasn’t worked out well.”
---
Whatever the havoc and destruction rn it will take a long time to effect any long terms shifts, from an investor perspective
― xyzzzz__, Sunday, 11 May 2025 20:11 (three months ago)
I'm sure the prospectus is like, "The country is teetering on the edge of autocracy and political instability. But the regulatory environment is favorable and restrictions are being loosened on the abundant natural resources. Labor is likely to remain relatively cheap for a developed country for the foreseeable future."
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 11 May 2025 23:28 (three months ago)
*horshoe flying across our faces* price controls on pharma
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 12 May 2025 07:47 (three months ago)
It appears that Trump has bent the knee on tariffs. “Temporary” trade war pause with 30% tariffs. (Up from 25% IIRC)
― Lady Sovereign (Citizen) (milo z), Monday, 12 May 2025 07:50 (three months ago)
"With the 115% deduction, Chinese duties on US goods will be lowered to 10%, while the US tax on Chinese goods will be lowered to 30%. That is because the US tariffs include a 20% rate imposed by Trump before the latest trade war, which the president said was related to China’s role in the US’s fentanyl crisis. The fentanyl-related tariff will still apply."
No empty shelves so deportations can continue.
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 12 May 2025 10:16 (three months ago)
They're not deportations, they're renditions. And they're not dependent on how full or empty shelves are
― anvil, Monday, 12 May 2025 11:54 (three months ago)
And we're going to have empty shelves for a while either way.
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Monday, 12 May 2025 12:38 (three months ago)
the art of the deal folks!
― imperial frfr (Steve Shasta), Monday, 12 May 2025 14:06 (three months ago)
just like the uk deal, american consumers will pay more than residents of the counterpart country
― gestures broadly at...everything (voodoo chili), Monday, 12 May 2025 14:14 (three months ago)
curious to see what happens to prices and inventories over the next months. firms stockpiled inventories in january feb and march, and drawing down those inventories is why we aren’t seeing widespread shortages despite the reduction in freight volumes. now they’ll go on another burst of inventory stocking in case negotiations fail and the high tariffs return. i guess it all depends on the timing of the lags from maritime shipping over long distances?
― flopson, Monday, 12 May 2025 14:53 (three months ago)
Yeah… when shipping is turned back on, it will take about a month for things to sail to the us, unless companies decide to airfreight but that’s prohibitively expensive for large volume orders. (I guess I’m assuming that the idle vessels are already in China ports but I guess they could be in some other region so then you have to add the time to get back to China)
― duolingo ate my baby (Jon not Jon), Monday, 12 May 2025 15:11 (three months ago)
I listened to an interview with the Baltimore port director recently who said many importers had filled warehouse space at the port for goods that the port "put under bond", meaning they had not officially cleared customs and therefore had not been subjected to tariff. The importers were hoping Trump would climb down from his ridiculous tariffs soon enough to be able to release those goods under a much better tariff structure. ofc, warehousing stuff in that way can only cover a portion of the requirements of the US economy, which has been optimized for "just in time" deliveries of parts and materials.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Monday, 12 May 2025 17:11 (three months ago)
I have skimmed the entirety of the House tax bill … will post about the most stupid bits later
But to start: MAGA Accounts
― sarahell, Tuesday, 13 May 2025 23:28 (three months ago)
yeah, I heard about that part... what the fuck is that? Eh, don't we already have treasury savings bonds?
you have to put in a minimum of five grand a year? Does this go into some Trump cryptoshit or something?
― Andy the Grasshopper, Tuesday, 13 May 2025 23:37 (three months ago)
Things in the house tax bill that are stupid:
Deduction for tip income (meaning it isn’t taxed) … they do have rules so that investment bankers and brokers don’t get to decide that they received “tip income” … and supposedly it will only be allowed for occupations that normally receive tip income and there will be a list of these created at some point
Gym memberships and fitness training get to be considered medical expenses
EITC certificates… the solution to earned income credit “fraud” is that they will issue certificates for kids.
They are revoking the excise tax on gun silencers and indoor tanning
They are imposing a tax on remittances
They are revoking the federal government’s ability to regulate contingent fees by tax professionals (basically this encourages scammers and fraud in the tax industry)
And the one you might be hearing the most about…. Revoking exempt status for nonprofits that are “terrorist supporting” … how do they define it? … They just get to decide… they will have a list … it will be arbitrary.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 14 May 2025 14:50 (three months ago)
More stupid:Taxing transit benefits for nonprofit employees… this is so dumb because they tried to do this before and it was struck down as nonsensical and impossible.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 14 May 2025 14:52 (three months ago)
There are many more things that are basically “let’s fuck over immigrants with the tax code” that some substack pro will write about
― sarahell, Wednesday, 14 May 2025 14:58 (three months ago)
Thanks sarah for sharing (I assume you do it for work). I’ve been avoiding any non- arts and music news that isn’t on this board (probably not a good idea but my mental health has improved). (And even Trump has now infiltrated arts news, unlike his first term.)
― Bangel, Bangel & Bangel (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 14 May 2025 15:40 (three months ago)
The National Association of Nonprofits have launched an advocacy campaign about it … it’s one of those things where certain things they are opposing entail raising taxes on the wealthy (which in their view lower charitable giving), but they aren’t supporting other provisions that encourage charitable giving (like increasing the SALT cap). So my feeling is that they should just focus on the absurd attacks on nonprofits and omit the other points.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 14 May 2025 15:56 (three months ago)
MAGA accounts are kinda like ROTH IRAs for kids … but they have to be invested in Index Funds for US securities….
― sarahell, Wednesday, 14 May 2025 16:38 (three months ago)
So they're another gift to the equity markets, like 401Ks instead of defined pension plans.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Wednesday, 14 May 2025 17:09 (three months ago)
Yes! And a way to reduce kiddie tax for the affluent!
― sarahell, Wednesday, 14 May 2025 17:41 (three months ago)
The fact it specifies an “index fund” is questionable… as opposed to investing in a handful of companies… like I have seen kid investment accounts where they invest based on the kid’s interests … lots of Disney and Hasbro and railroads
― sarahell, Wednesday, 14 May 2025 17:45 (three months ago)
Probably awkward to invest in Grindr in a kid account but …
― sarahell, Wednesday, 14 May 2025 17:47 (three months ago)
My son is heavily invested in Pokémon
― Heez, Wednesday, 14 May 2025 19:13 (three months ago)
And he should be able to have a 100% pokemon portfolio
― sarahell, Wednesday, 14 May 2025 21:37 (three months ago)
here we go again
US reportedly plans to slash bank rules imposed to prevent 2008-style crash
US watchdogs are reportedly planning to slash capital rules for banks designed to prevent another 2008-style crash, as Donald Trump’s deregulation drive opens the door to the biggest rollback of post-crisis protections in more than a decade.
The move follows heavy lobbying by the banking industry, with lenders such as JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs having long complained that competition and lending have been hindered by burdensome rules governing the assets they must hold versus their liabilities.
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 15 May 2025 17:52 (three months ago)
burdensome rules governing the assets they must hold versus their liabilities
Their real complaint is that it cuts into their potential profits by limiting the amount of risk they are allowed to indulge in. Those same fucking banks got bailed out to the tune of trillions of dollars of high risk investments the Federal Reserve was obliged to take off their books, because otherwise the whole economy would have been drowned by the tsumani of bad debts those banks happily financed. Fuck 'em all. They should be groveling at the feet of regulators in gratitude for saving their sorry arses.
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Thursday, 15 May 2025 18:04 (three months ago)
They are also planning to deregulate further so that banks can’t use aversion to risk as an excuse not to lend … like to cryptofunds … totally can’t see any problems there
― sarahell, Thursday, 15 May 2025 18:57 (three months ago)
Aimless otm
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 15 May 2025 19:09 (three months ago)
bankers are worse than scum
― budo jeru, Thursday, 15 May 2025 19:42 (three months ago)
jeez, this thing with the bond markets, and the big selloff... Trump is single-handedly tanking the U.S. economy, just like he promised he'd do
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/markets/us-markets-fall-over-worries-about-debt-inflation-rcna208276
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 21 May 2025 20:44 (three months ago)
Line go down bad right
― Its big ball chunky time (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 21 May 2025 21:12 (three months ago)
There’s a whole section of the tax bill about “unfair foreign taxes” … besides the cringeworthy language that makes it sound like the idea of a preschooler… it’s also stupid.
― sarahell, Wednesday, 21 May 2025 21:40 (three months ago)
what are the 'foreign taxes'? Tariffs, I assume
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 21 May 2025 22:38 (three months ago)
As the partner of someone who is still an American but lives in Australia, let me tell you about unfair foreign taxes.
― Ed, Wednesday, 21 May 2025 23:09 (three months ago)
i don't think the market likes this new tax bill
― 龜, Thursday, 22 May 2025 14:54 (three months ago)
It has mixed feelings atm
― sarahell, Thursday, 22 May 2025 16:14 (three months ago)
so happy trump is back to destroying the economy again
― flopson, Friday, 23 May 2025 15:17 (three months ago)
It’s kinda surprising the NYT hasn’t done an article yet about the MAGA accounts (for American born children)… I would be interested in your take, flopson…
My take:It will basically benefit the wealthy because they can use these accounts to transfer wealth to their young children without paying tax on it. Currently, investment income of kids is taxed at the parents’ tax rate (with an exclusion of a small amount). It’s also a benefit to Wall Street because the money has to be invested in index funds of US stocks.
― sarahell, Friday, 23 May 2025 15:36 (three months ago)
It’s kinda surprising the NYT hasn’t done an article yet about the MAGA accounts (for American born children)… I would be interested in your take, flopson…My take:It will basically benefit the wealthy because they can use these accounts to transfer wealth to their young children without paying tax on it. Currently, investment income of kids is taxed at the parents’ tax rate (with an exclusion of a small amount). It’s also a benefit to Wall Street because the money has to be invested in index funds of US stocks.― sarahell, Friday, 23 May 2025 11:36 (two hours ago) bookmarkflaglink
― sarahell, Friday, 23 May 2025 11:36 (two hours ago) bookmarkflaglink
i’ll post more later but at first glance the policy looks similar to the ‘baby bonds’ policy proposed by cory booker and new school economist darrick hamilton. i think their version is means tested so only low income families get the bonds, whereas trump’s are more universal? but i’ve yet to see a careful side-by-side comparison. i read somewhere that hamilton doesn’t like the maga accounts version, but the article didn’t include any detailed quotes on why. i want to learn more about the details, but fwiw i dont think it’s a terrible idea on its face, and find it a bit sad that rebranding it as “maga accounts” will likely polarize it more than necessary. hamilton and booker’s version (which iirc passed in connecticut recently?) was framed as a policy to reduce the racial wealth gap that was (at least superficially) “race-blind” and therefore couldn’t be struck down by the courts. this nyt coverage from 2019 is worth reading
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/10/upshot/racial-wealth-gap-2020-candidates.html
― flopson, Friday, 23 May 2025 17:53 (three months ago)
(before man alive or someone jumps in assuming darrick hamilton is an economist and therefore a conservative chicago free market ideologue, i should add that he was an advisor to bernie sanders campaign, worked on biden-sanders joint economic policy committee, supports federal job guarantee, and generally is on the left-heterodox faction in econ)
― flopson, Friday, 23 May 2025 18:00 (three months ago)
Means tested is the key difference! As well as what the funds are invested in and who manages them.
― sarahell, Friday, 23 May 2025 18:29 (three months ago)
An index fund invested in publicly traded US equities is enriching Wall Street whereas government bonds… perhaps in low-income housing or other common muni bond projects… would invest in repairing other inequities… (yes pun intended)
― sarahell, Friday, 23 May 2025 18:32 (three months ago)
Means testing makes any program more expensive to run than making it universal.
― einstürzende louboutin (suzy), Friday, 23 May 2025 18:33 (three months ago)
hamilton. i think their version is means tested so only low income families get the bonds, whereas trump’s are more universal? but i’ve yet to see a careful side-by-side comparison. i read somewhere that hamilton doesn’t like the maga accounts version, but the article didn’t include any detailed quotes on why. i want to learn more about the details, but fwiw i dont think it’s a terrible idea on its face, and find it a bit sad that rebranding it as “maga accounts” will likely polarize it more than necessary. hamilton
Sorry I can only understand this as a rap
― zydecodependent (Ye Mad Puffin), Saturday, 24 May 2025 00:25 (three months ago)
there is no way social security would have survived as a means-tested program. to make any social program means tested is to guarantee its ultimate evisceration or death imo
― Theodor W. Adorbso (Hunt3r), Saturday, 24 May 2025 01:31 (three months ago)
Means testing makes any program more expensive to run than making it universal.― einstürzende louboutin (suzy), Saturday, May 24, 2025 4:33 AM (eight hours ago) bookmarkflaglink
― einstürzende louboutin (suzy), Saturday, May 24, 2025 4:33 AM (eight hours ago) bookmarkflaglink
OTM, whilst this trump thing is almost certainly a POS means testing benefits is a way of making them expensive and ineffectual. The vast majority of people aren’t stupendously wealthy and if a few wealthy people benefit, so what. A means test is just a lever to pull to reduce any benefit programme to the smallest, meanest possible population. Medicare, Medicaid are means tested public health and look for hat an awful shit show the US healthcare system is.
I’m a bit skeptical of some of the proponents of UBI but I’m not against the universality of it. It’s effectively negative income tax for the first tax band.
Make benefits universal, generous and cheap to administer; then tax the shit out of the wealthy to pay for them.
― Ed, Saturday, 24 May 2025 03:41 (three months ago)
Means testing is weasely , centrist compromises BS.
― Ed, Saturday, 24 May 2025 03:43 (three months ago)
Also its easy to structure the testing mechanism it as a covert form of abuse for the recipients
― more difficult than I look (Aimless), Saturday, 24 May 2025 03:54 (three months ago)
the main thing is that it makes it a benefit that “some people” get, and that others do not get. which guarantees it’s evisceration or death. the attempt to make it “fair” instead makes it forever unfair
― Theodor W. Adorbso (Hunt3r), Saturday, 24 May 2025 04:01 (three months ago)
The US tax code has a lot of deductions and credits that are essentially means tested. Having a program that was meant as a form of reparations for slavery be universal, including to affluent white people, defeats the purpose.
― sarahell, Saturday, 24 May 2025 06:33 (three months ago)
I’ve spent the past few weeks slowly putting together an application for UK disability benefits for my neighbour - the application is onerous AF, simply because successive governments disliked giving doctors ultimate say over determining which of their patients needed incapacity benefits, and of course creating a narrative of workshy scrounging shirkers that the RW press loves to amplify.
― einstürzende louboutin (suzy), Saturday, 24 May 2025 06:46 (three months ago)
No that stuff is truly awful … I agree. My thought re an equitable baby bonds program would be that the means testing would go the other way… people whose tax returns show that they are wealthy would be excluded and everyone else would automatically get the benefit.
― sarahell, Saturday, 24 May 2025 16:27 (three months ago)
sarahell otm. i think a lot of the other people posting about means-testing are brain poisoned by reading too much on twitter or whatever where it became a wedge issue in intra-left policy fights. but a policy proposed by a left-heterodox black economist who was an adviser to bernie sanders, designed with the goal of closing racial wealth gaps based on decades of research, is not “ weasely, centrist compromises BS”, imo. as sarahell noted, a policy that gives an equal slice of wealth to everyone would do nothing to close the racial wealth gap. any policy that redistributes income or resources towards poorer people is means-tested. another word for progressive taxation is “means-tested” taxation. and while there are definitely many cases where administration costs are significant, and also many others where there are hurdles to signing people up, a lot of benefits administered through the tax system that are means-tested on income are literally equivalent to progressive taxation in cost of administering and difficulty to apply for. this is different than things like registering for SNAP, unemployment or disability benefits, or medicaid, which is where a lot of the fights over means-testing comes from. its a subtle but crucial difference
― flopson, Saturday, 24 May 2025 16:39 (three months ago)
xp or everyone would get the benefit (the universal bit) but rich people above a certain income would have it clawed back in tax (the progressive bit).
― einstürzende louboutin (suzy), Saturday, 24 May 2025 16:50 (three months ago)
a good example is the CTC. these are means-tested: low income families receive more than high income families. you don’t need to proactively sign up, the benefits are administered entirely through the tax system, and anyone who has recently filed would receive benefits automatically. the only real administrative cost is someone changing a few lines of code in the IRS system.
now there *were* some administrative costs associated with biden’s expanded CTC. because they wanted to make sure people who were eligible but had not filed taxes recently received benefits, so they had an outreach program and created an applet that made it easy to sign up. but the costs of these are very small compared to the cost of giving the maximum benefit to every family (ie, removing means-testing without having any low income family receive a lower transfer). this is partly due to idiosyncrasies of the US tax system. in canada, where virtually all low income families file, there is literally zero cost
CTC is an example of horizontal redistribution. we tend to think that a low income parent has greater needs than a low income single person, and so we make a progressive transfer to low income parents. it is means tested for the same reason taxation is progressive, and has the same administrative cost and sign up hurdle
― flopson, Saturday, 24 May 2025 16:55 (three months ago)
xp or everyone would get the benefit (the universal bit) but rich people above a certain income would have it clawed back in tax (the progressive bit).― einstürzende louboutin (suzy), Saturday, 24 May 2025 12:50 (four minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
― einstürzende louboutin (suzy), Saturday, 24 May 2025 12:50 (four minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink
this is mathematically equivalent
ftr i like universal benefits and think in the cases where means testing is administratively costly and prevents people in need from signing up it is bad. but you need to be careful when arguing against means-testing that you aren’t implicitly arguing for flat-tax libertarianism
― flopson, Saturday, 24 May 2025 17:04 (three months ago)
No, we need to tax billionaires and other rich people at a higher rate on unearned income. Obviously.
― einstürzende louboutin (suzy), Saturday, 24 May 2025 17:09 (three months ago)
benighted people: means testing is a sham, usually unnecessary, often totally scammed out, creates welfare queens as a rightwing argument style, and gives them fuel to make even people likely to end up in need vote against it because they hate the poor (who they are but are in denial).
― Theodor W. Adorbso (Hunt3r), Saturday, 24 May 2025 18:28 (three months ago)
but you need to be careful when arguing against means-testing that you aren’t implicitly arguing for flat-tax libertarianism
this is ridiculous
Bernie hired a lot of useless people in his campaigns, one economic adviser trying to solve capitalism's wealth disparity gap with more capitalism doesn't make it not "weaselly centrist compromises BS."
― Lady Sovereign (Citizen) (milo z), Saturday, 24 May 2025 18:32 (three months ago)
Absolutely no one talking about the failures of means-testing is doing it as crypto-criticism of progressive taxation.
― Lady Sovereign (Citizen) (milo z), Saturday, 24 May 2025 18:33 (three months ago)
suzy: i think there might be some confusion, so i’ll be specific.
if i have a policy whose goal is to give money to some group (e.g. low income families), there are two options
(1) give the benefit to the people in the group(2) give the benefit to everyone, then increase taxes on everyone not in the group by the amount of the benefit
for example, if i want to give 1.5k per month to single mothers with income under 30k per year, i can give them a benefit. or i can give everyone a 1.5k per month credit, then increases everyone who is not a single mother’s taxes by 1.5k. both are equivalent, in the sense that everyone ends up with the same amount of after tax and transfer income. imo, it doesn’t make sense to refer to one as means-tested and not the other, purely on the basis of the administration procedure, but ymmv. the terminology doesn’t matter
horizontal redistribution (i.e., sending money to families, whether in the form of CTC or baby bonds/maga accounts) can’t be reproduced by a progressive taxation on income and wealth alone (vertical redistribution). the point of horizontal redistribution is to equalize living standards between families with different numbers of workers and dependents. if you argue that all programs need to be universal *and* the only redistributionary tool is progressive taxation (i.e., higher taxes for the rich) you are arguing against horizontal redistribution. this means we should e.g. replace child credits and social security with a flat universal basic income. totally fine to argue for this, if that is the policy you prefer. but horizontal redistribution has historically been a key component of social democratic welfare states. good post on this:
https://www.peoplespolicyproject.org/2022/02/18/why-we-need-the-welfare-state/
― flopson, Saturday, 24 May 2025 18:45 (three months ago)
"you don’t need to proactively sign up, the benefits are administered entirely through the tax system, and anyone who has recently filed would receive benefits automatically."
this is cool
― brimstead, Saturday, 24 May 2025 21:41 (three months ago)
seems like perhaps part of the confusion here is the equating of means testing with "applying for shit/gathering documents/writing a personal essay"
― brimstead, Saturday, 24 May 2025 21:42 (three months ago)
£20 billion in uncollected/unapplied-for benefits accrues each year in the UK, both means-tested and not.
― einstürzende louboutin (suzy), Saturday, 24 May 2025 22:21 (three months ago)
seems like perhaps part of the confusion here is the equating of means testing with "applying for shit/gathering documents/writing a personal essay"― brimstead, Sunday, May 25, 2025 7:42 AM (one hour ago) bookmarkflaglink
― brimstead, Sunday, May 25, 2025 7:42 AM (one hour ago) bookmarkflaglink
Both of these are ways of denying benefits/wealth redistributions to people that need them. Think of making benefits universal and automatic as a way of balancing out the fact that the wealthy can pay teams of people to wriggle out of paying their fair share of tax.
I’ll take equality over equity every time if it delivers a better outcome. I get there are painful historical reasons why different groups have ended up on the bottom of the pile but division into deserving or undeserving or deserving more doesn’t help, it is just a tool to keep poor people poor. There’s better places to solve ingrained historical structural inequality than deciding who gets to live indoors, eat or see the doctor.
If everyone gets baseline human dignity by default then we’re probably in a much better, more empathetic place where we can deal with these issues. If everyone isn’t fight for a piece of manufactured scarcity.
I go hot a cold on UBI because of its associations with libertarian, flat earth, flat tax wackos, but universal housing, universal education, universal healthcare and universal nutrition seem pretty unarguably fundamental to me.
Throw in universal public health, clean air and water, arts, entertainment and recreation as well because human dignity is about more than subsistence.
― Ed, Saturday, 24 May 2025 23:56 (three months ago)
Honestly my thought in terms of implementation is along the lines of what flopson was saying:1. Kid receives a social security number—-> an account is created2. All kids under the maximum age are in a database 3. The database receives information from IRS tax returns 4. Tax returns with a kid in the database where the filer(s) have income above a certain amount (idk $300k) —-> those kids get filtered out for the year the tax return covers4a. The income total would exclude amounts for certain legal settlements (this is generally the only thing that a poor person/middle class person would receive that could jack up their income but not be an indicator of wealth)5. The kids who are not filtered out get government payments
This would solve for the issue of people who don’t file taxes because they aren’t required to or who have other bureaucratic complications that make them averse to filing (e.g. homelessness, semi-legal employment, etc)
Rich people are way more likely to file, if only because they face more adverse consequences for not filing, in terms of penalties because their income is more often reported by payers who are required to report
One could suggest… what if the rich people omit their children from their taxes? … The tax benefits of claiming the kids outweigh the $1000 that they’d get from the government, and many affluent people would be fine with this system as is because they see themselves as fortunate.
― sarahell, Sunday, 25 May 2025 18:19 (three months ago)
If you allow anyone besides the upper and middle class to get a benefit that they do not get, the upper and middle class will never rest. they will bleat and reduce and block and lie to kill that benefit- even to those who have clear need- until it is gone. those privileged classes have the time and clout to do it. needs testing is a way to get rid those lazy fraudsters. they should get additional jobs.Now, if they GET a benefit which others do not, you are exaggerating! But whatever. Even if they do have a benefit, well, they are just smart, and they actually earn those benefits. Actually they are getting shorted and fucked over. You should cut their taxes, too.
― Theodor W. Adorbso (Hunt3r), Sunday, 25 May 2025 23:46 (three months ago)
And boom go the tariffs. That's the judgment itself, here's a summary from Politico:
A federal court has struck down President Donald Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs on a wide range of countries, saying his effort to justify them with broad claims of national emergencies exceeded his legal authority....“The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs,” the New York-based federal court said in its opinion, referring to the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act.The court also ordered that the tariffs that the Trump administration has collected so far be “vacated.”
“The Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariff Orders exceed any authority granted to the President by IEEPA to regulate importation by means of tariffs,” the New York-based federal court said in its opinion, referring to the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
The court also ordered that the tariffs that the Trump administration has collected so far be “vacated.”
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 May 2025 00:08 (two months ago)
I have to admit that until the lawsuits were filed I didn't even know this court existed:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_International_Trade
It's also unclear to me what the appeals process is...if there is one?
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 May 2025 00:14 (two months ago)
Interesing, I'd never heard of them either. Their website says judgments can be appealed to the Federal Circuit court and then to SCOTUS. Federal Circuit Court currently has zero Trump appointees, fwiw.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 29 May 2025 00:21 (two months ago)
Okay, that follows. Guess that'll happen!
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 May 2025 00:27 (two months ago)
interesting thing in that ruling: the revenue-raising purpose of tariffs has declined significantly since the ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment in 1913 permitted the imposition of income taxes
So while the Trump admin has vehemently denied that the tariffs are VAT or a national sales tax, it seems that's exactly how they were viewed in the past
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 29 May 2025 00:30 (two months ago)
wonder what the inevitable wriggle will involve this time, probably another end runhttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/may/27/a-hidden-measure-in-the-republican-budget-bill-would-crown-trump-king
― sleeve, Thursday, 29 May 2025 00:32 (two months ago)
Presumably he can demand said 1977 act be revised/updated by the current congress but I kinda can't see THAT happening for a variety of reasons. They were pretty much heads-in-the-sand on it to start with, now they're going to have any number of businesses and the like yelling at them not to do anything.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 May 2025 00:38 (two months ago)
while I respect your optimism, your track record on these predictions hasn't been that great over the last couple of years
― sleeve, Thursday, 29 May 2025 00:48 (two months ago)
That clause about courts not being able to enforce contempt rulings that Reich is worried about — rightly worried — looks likely to get taken out of the Senate version of the budget bill. It's probably not something that can be passed via reconciliation.
But if SCOTUS upholds the ruling, I agree the challenge will be to what degree Trump agrees to be bound by it. One problem I can see for him is trying to have the feds collect on a tariff if both the sellers and buyers know SCOTUS has ruled it illegal. What are they gonna if people refuse to pay? Shut down trade completely? I don't see that being very popular.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 29 May 2025 00:58 (two months ago)
xpost True enough! But it's less optimism and more "We'd like to actually PLAN our fucking business projections, thank you."
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 May 2025 00:58 (two months ago)
david vs goliath
The lawsuit was filed by a group of small businesses, including a wine importer, V.O.S. Selections, whose owner has said the tariffs are having a major impact and his company may not survive.
― Andy the Grasshopper, Thursday, 29 May 2025 01:02 (two months ago)
That’s part of the plan, Theil hates small business and believes that the economy should be run by a few conglomerates
― That Pedo Band (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 29 May 2025 01:24 (two months ago)
Per Tipsy Mothra above, this is where the appeal goes next:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Federal_Circuit
And this is honestly even MORE obscure to me. There's a pretty good Bluesky thread from lawyer types talking about learning about these courts (and then pretending to have already learned about them), and one of the responses was "Us patent weirdos to everyone else: welcome to our hidden lair!"
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 May 2025 02:29 (two months ago)
Interesting detail:
The decisions of the Federal Circuit, particularly in regard to patent cases, are unique in that they are binding precedent throughout the U.S. within the bounds of the court's subject-matter jurisdiction. This is unlike the other courts of appeals as the authority of their decisions is restricted by geographic location and thus there may be differing judicial standards depending on location. Decisions of the Federal Circuit are only superseded by decisions of the Supreme Court or by applicable changes in the law. Also, review by the Supreme Court is discretionary, so Federal Circuit decisions are often the final word, especially since there are no circuit splits given the Federal Circuit's exclusive subject-matter jurisdiction.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 May 2025 02:33 (two months ago)
Federal Circuit is less obscure b/c of the subject of patents which are litigated way more than say international trade
― a (waterface), Thursday, 29 May 2025 16:56 (two months ago)
that's just my two c's, obv
― a (waterface), Thursday, 29 May 2025 16:57 (two months ago)
Another court weighing in on a separate case:
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/29/second-federal-court-rules-against-trumps-tariffs-00374377
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 May 2025 17:51 (two months ago)
A useful enough dive into things re yesterday's decision. There's a lot at play!
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 May 2025 18:04 (two months ago)
what
Newsflash: Donald Trump has announced that the US trade deal with China is “done”, following the talks in London this week.He explains that the US will get the access to Chinese rare earth minerals, and magnets, which his officials had been pushing for at Lancaster House on Monday and Tuesday.
He explains that the US will get the access to Chinese rare earth minerals, and magnets, which his officials had been pushing for at Lancaster House on Monday and Tuesday.
― Kim Kimberly, Wednesday, 11 June 2025 14:27 (two months ago)
OUR DEAL WITH CHINA IS DONE, SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL WITH PRESIDENT XI AND ME. FULL MAGNETS, AND ANY NECESSARY RARE EARTHS, WILL BE SUPPLIED, UP FRONT, BY CHINA.
― Kim Kimberly, Wednesday, 11 June 2025 14:28 (two months ago)
Thank you to Trade Envoy Violent J.
― Lady Sovereign (Citizen) (milo z), Wednesday, 11 June 2025 14:31 (two months ago)
Lol what the hell is he taking about.
― The "W" and Odie Trail (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 11 June 2025 14:46 (two months ago)
ah ok
China’s strict controls on the export of heat-resistant magnets made with rare earth minerals have exposed a major vulnerability in the U.S. military supply chain.Without these magnets, the United States and its allies in Europe will struggle to refill recently depleted inventories of military hardware.[...] On April 4, China halted exports of seven kinds of rare earth metals, as well as magnets made from them. China controls most of the world’s supply of these metals and magnets.
Without these magnets, the United States and its allies in Europe will struggle to refill recently depleted inventories of military hardware.
[...] On April 4, China halted exports of seven kinds of rare earth metals, as well as magnets made from them. China controls most of the world’s supply of these metals and magnets.
― Kim Kimberly, Wednesday, 11 June 2025 15:18 (two months ago)
Can definitely see a WWII-era rationing campaign in which we are encouraged to hunker down and use masking tape instead of magnets to affix report cards to refrigerator doors. "Stick It To Xi" as a slogan, or somesuch.
― henry s, Wednesday, 11 June 2025 15:25 (two months ago)
(Source: China’s Chokehold on This Obscure Mineral Threatens the West’s Militaries)
― Kim Kimberly, Wednesday, 11 June 2025 15:29 (two months ago)
https://live.staticflickr.com/4038/4499801931_ca69a60dc0_c.jpg
― Blake the Messenger (Tom D.), Wednesday, 11 June 2025 15:35 (two months ago)
If we hadn't been wasting all those precious magnets on magic tricks and doodles we wouldn't be in this mess.
― henry s, Wednesday, 11 June 2025 16:00 (two months ago)
And are tanks really made up of stacked magnets? Things you didn't learn until you were shockingly old, etc.
― henry s, Wednesday, 11 June 2025 16:02 (two months ago)
How do they fuckin work tho
― zydecodependent (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 11 June 2025 16:17 (two months ago)
Seems like someone should have considered "where do we get all the stuff to make da bombs" before generating a bipartisan consensus on Cold War 2 with China.
― Lady Sovereign (Citizen) (milo z), Wednesday, 11 June 2025 16:25 (two months ago)
Permanent magnets are used to generate electricity in vehicles with magnetos (vs. alternators) to charge the battery.
― Jaq, Wednesday, 11 June 2025 16:28 (two months ago)
ooooh - Trump is getting China to repress the Rare Earth back catalog?!
― Western® with Bacon Flavor, Wednesday, 11 June 2025 16:55 (two months ago)
The MAGA / Juggalo axis of LOLs
― sarahell, Wednesday, 11 June 2025 17:00 (two months ago)
What’s this about the obscure Motown sub label?
― The "W" and Odie Trail (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 11 June 2025 17:24 (two months ago)
Juggalos are libs, though.
― Lady Sovereign (Citizen) (milo z), Wednesday, 11 June 2025 17:30 (two months ago)
Ilxor.com does not have any threads about Juggalos. I am not familiar with this term.
― zydecodependent (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 11 June 2025 18:28 (two months ago)
The Insane Clown Posse family. The feds have labeled them a gang, they ended up joining some anti-fascist marches during the first term.
― Lady Sovereign (Citizen) (milo z), Wednesday, 11 June 2025 18:31 (two months ago)
Are you suggesting that the fan base of a band has become something like its own subculture? Wild.
― zydecodependent (Ye Mad Puffin), Wednesday, 11 June 2025 18:39 (two months ago)
So this fantastic 'deal' still includes 55% tariffs?
The 55% tariff total appears at first glance to be a hike from the 30% rate agreed in the truce struck early last month when both sides slashed triple-digit rates. However, a White House official said it merely reflected Trump’s worldwide 10% baseline “reciprocal” tariff on imports, the 20% fentanyl trafficking levy and a 25% pre-existing tariff on China.
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 11 June 2025 19:26 (two months ago)
55% tariff on China would be really really bad for the economy right?
― frogbs, Wednesday, 11 June 2025 19:53 (two months ago)
consumer spending is only ~2/3 of our GDP nbd
― Lady Sovereign (Citizen) (milo z), Wednesday, 11 June 2025 19:56 (two months ago)
Major downer today with the obvious exceptions
― sarahell, Friday, 13 June 2025 20:41 (two months ago)
starting Monday I have a 401k equivalent with a 5% match so I must now be deeply concerned at all times with line goes up, not looking forward to it
― Lady Sovereign (Citizen) (milo z), Friday, 13 June 2025 22:31 (two months ago)
403(b)? nice to have that match, that'll help ease the inevitable erosion
― Andy the Grasshopper, Friday, 13 June 2025 22:39 (two months ago)
TSP - Thrifty Savings Plan
― Lady Sovereign (Citizen) (milo z), Friday, 13 June 2025 22:53 (two months ago)
Lol you are young enough that you can continue to care about actual people being fucked rn and not the stock market tbh
― sarahell, Saturday, 14 June 2025 00:50 (two months ago)
congrats milo!
― Doctor Casino, Saturday, 14 June 2025 08:28 (two months ago)
Wait Milo got a federal job?!?
― Heez, Saturday, 14 June 2025 15:04 (two months ago)
I’m now personally responsible if your mail is lost.
― Lady Sovereign (Citizen) (milo z), Saturday, 14 June 2025 16:00 (two months ago)
Congrats and good luck
― Heez, Saturday, 14 June 2025 16:06 (two months ago)
I hope they used the recruitment slogan "Go Postal!"
― zydecodependent (Ye Mad Puffin), Saturday, 14 June 2025 17:05 (two months ago)
great detailed posts digging into data on imports since april 2
https://www.apricitas.io/p/how-tariffs-are-breaking-us-trade
Although virtually every part of US trade has been affected by these tariffs, the shifts in the overall trade deficit have been dominated by only two types of goods: pharmaceuticals & gold. US imports of gold spiked to record highs early this year as uncertainty spiked gold prices and fears that gold would not be exempted from tariffs caused a rift between American and European prices. The end result was a massive surge in gold imports, especially from Switzerland, as panicked consumers searched for safety and financial firms worked to arbitrage the American price premium. That surge in imports rapidly dissipated when it became clear that gold bullion would be exempt from the tariffs, leading to a historic drop in imports during April. Yet this is a great example of the costs of tariff uncertainty, as exempting gold imports from the get-go would have avoided much of this panic buying.
^great example of the uncertainty costs
The second major contributor to recent historic shifts in the trade deficit has been pharmaceuticals, where imports peaked at 142% above their 2024 levels before dropping. Drug imports have been mentioned as a key tariff target for months, and while they have so far remained exempt from almost all of Trump’s tariffs, pharmaceutical companies are not taking any chances and stocking up as much inventory as possible. The vast majority of that import surge has come from the European Union, home of research and manufacturing hubs that have long been America’s number one foreign source of medicine—and they’ve been particularly concentrated in Ireland, where many drug multinationals manufacture for tax avoidance purposes.
^i hadn’t realized the extent to which tariff threat was driving import demand in non-tariffed industries
The largest tariffs America has implemented are those on China—at peak, tariffs on most Chinese goods were a staggering 145%, and even now they sit at a historically unprecedented high of 30% for most goods. To put the intensity into perspective, half of all April tariff revenue was collected from Chinese imports. Those tariffs have dramatically reduced the amount of direct trade between the world’s two largest economies, with US imports from China dropping more than 40% between January and April, reaching the lowest levels since March 2020.That drop in Chinese imports was led by the country’s large consumer electronics sector, which has long been the world’s primary source of technological devices. US imports of Chinese computers are down 70% compared to last year, with laptop imports dropping to the lowest level in more than 20 years. Imports from Taiwan, Mexico, Vietnam, and a few other countries (like Thailand) have largely made up the slack but are still collectively struggling to meet America’s ravenous demand for computers.Likewise, US smartphone imports dramatically tanked as tariffs on China ramped up, with imports also dropping 70% compared to last April. America instead bought more phones from India and Vietnam, with both countries surpassing China as a source of imports in the last two months. This largely represents the decision-making of Apple, the country’s dominant phone brand, which has long worked to partially diversify its supply chains out of China and is now putting in overtime to assemble most American phones in its Indian & Vietnamese factories. Yet right now, those non-Chinese-made phones are still nowhere near enough to make up for the shortfall caused by the China tariffs. That’s despite those non-Chinese phones remaining exempt from all tariffs, as Trump has made no moves to implement his long-promised semiconductor and electronics tariffs
That drop in Chinese imports was led by the country’s large consumer electronics sector, which has long been the world’s primary source of technological devices. US imports of Chinese computers are down 70% compared to last year, with laptop imports dropping to the lowest level in more than 20 years. Imports from Taiwan, Mexico, Vietnam, and a few other countries (like Thailand) have largely made up the slack but are still collectively struggling to meet America’s ravenous demand for computers.
Likewise, US smartphone imports dramatically tanked as tariffs on China ramped up, with imports also dropping 70% compared to last April. America instead bought more phones from India and Vietnam, with both countries surpassing China as a source of imports in the last two months. This largely represents the decision-making of Apple, the country’s dominant phone brand, which has long worked to partially diversify its supply chains out of China and is now putting in overtime to assemble most American phones in its Indian & Vietnamese factories. Yet right now, those non-Chinese-made phones are still nowhere near enough to make up for the shortfall caused by the China tariffs. That’s despite those non-Chinese phones remaining exempt from all tariffs, as Trump has made no moves to implement his long-promised semiconductor and electronics tariffs
seems like demand is outstripping supply, must be inevitable that more expensive smart phones and laptops are coming soon
― flopson, Sunday, 15 June 2025 15:51 (two months ago)
There are investors who undoubtedly made huge profits buying low and selling high over the past two months on gold, and gold-related stocks. I made a few hundred bucks from this.
― sarahell, Sunday, 15 June 2025 17:28 (two months ago)
There has also been an increase in portfolio managers wanting gold and gold-back assets for diversification and hedging purposes which has also led to an increase in those shares.
― sarahell, Sunday, 15 June 2025 17:31 (two months ago)
It’s part of the “flight to safety” thing that in the past led to a big demand for US Bonds (not Gary).
― sarahell, Sunday, 15 June 2025 17:33 (two months ago)
https://www.cfr.org/article/what-trump-trade-policy-has-achieved-liberation-day
― xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 8 July 2025 21:26 (one month ago)
Fairly informative multi-opinion piece
A nice summary of opinions I have read already … good to know they are shared!
― sarahell, Wednesday, 9 July 2025 16:55 (one month ago)
Lesotho faces a crisis after U.S. tariffs crippled its garment industry, threatening jobs and reversing years of economic and social progress. pic.twitter.com/idyUHJEeQ2— African News feed. (@africansinnews) July 15, 2025
― xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 15 July 2025 15:38 (one month ago)
Free trade RIP
― xyzzzz__, Tuesday, 15 July 2025 15:39 (one month ago)
I thought we hated free trade
― Black Sabaoth (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 15 July 2025 16:50 (one month ago)
A joke for the fans.
Trump’s use of trade to pressure Vietnam to balance against China is built on a faulty premise. The U.S. thinks that if it pushes Vietnam hard enough with both sticks and carrots, coupled with Vietnam’s own maritime disputes with China, Vietnam will drop its multilateral foreign policy in service of Washington’s anti-China objectives in the Indo-Pacific. This is a superficial understanding of Vietnam’s security thinking. Hanoi will always prioritize security over its economy, and with the maritime disputes with China frozen to Hanoi’s benefit, Vietnam will not join any U.S.-led balancing coalition against China no matter how hard Washington pushes it on the trade front.
https://thediplomat.com/2025/07/why-vietnam-will-not-balance-against-china/
― xyzzzz__, Wednesday, 16 July 2025 16:25 (one month ago)
Not much to shout about in this deal with Japan.
https://www.ft.com/content/c1183b13-9135-41f6-9206-7b52af66f0a5
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 25 July 2025 18:19 (one month ago)
Looks like EU got fucked by the US. This article by a chap called Mao explains it.
The comprador-bourgeoisie is always a running dog of imperialism and a target of the revolution. Different groups of the comprador-bourgeoisie belong to the monopoly capitalist groups of different imperialist countries such as the United States, Britain and France. In the struggle against the various comprador groups it is necessary to exploit the contradictions between imperialist countries, first coping with one of them and striking at the chief immediate enemy.
https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-5/mswv5_54.htm
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 28 July 2025 20:59 (four weeks ago)
this just in: mao is still dead!
― scraping potus off the wheel (Hunt3r), Monday, 28 July 2025 21:04 (four weeks ago)
Swift thread on tariffs from Setser. My political read is we need stuff to go bad in the US much faster than it is, but the admin is sneaky with practical short term impacts being mitigated...long term that world is falling apart, perhaps, but he only mentions unintended consequences, which politically can be denied and hard to track back to Trump.
Trump's new tariff rate lack rhyme or reason (other than rewarding big countries that made an effort to give him a win ... )But -- as the decision on Brazil showed -- it is always important to know the exclusions as well as the headline rate ...1/— Brad Setser (@Brad_Setser) August 1, 2025
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 1 August 2025 06:50 (three weeks ago)
I think it shows that this Trump admin is getting stuff done, politically. There is a focus this time around that I don't quite remember being there in the first admin, plus covid probably derailed things too...
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 1 August 2025 06:58 (three weeks ago)
Striking re: Mexico and Canada.
It is striking how nothing about the tariff process has been global.The US did not try to bring everyone to Mar a Lago for a global arrangement but instead went bespoke country-by-country.And basically no countries joined together in common cause, not even Mexico and Canada.— Jason Furman (@jasonfurman) August 1, 2025
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 1 August 2025 08:35 (three weeks ago)
Does some crony need to cover his short positions…
― sarahell, Friday, 1 August 2025 13:15 (three weeks ago)
The jobs revisions for May and June look particularly dire.
The economy added just 19,000 in May, a massive downward revision from the 144,00 initially thought.June job gains were revised down to 14,000, down from the 147,000 first estimated.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/news/content/ar-AA1JITmG
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Friday, 1 August 2025 14:02 (three weeks ago)
June was the weakest month of job growth since December 2020, the last full month of Trump's first term
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Friday, 1 August 2025 14:08 (three weeks ago)
jukin the inflations stats
from the NYT
Cuts to Data Collection May Erode Reliability of Economic Statistics
The Bureau of Labor Statistics is reducing or ending the collection of data that is used to calculate the Consumer Price Index.Federal Reserve policymakers have stressed that their decisions on interest rates in coming months will depend on what happens in the economic data.Just one problem: That data may be becoming less reliable.The Bureau of Labor Statistics last month said it was reducing its collection of data on consumer prices, and had stopped gathering data entirely in several areas. On Tuesday, the agency provided more details on the cutbacks and indicated they were more significant than previously understood.Collecting the data that goes into the Consumer Price Index is a labor-intensive operation. Every month, a small army of government workers visits stores and other businesses across the country to check prices of eggs, underwear, haircuts and tens of thousands of other goods and services. The data collected is the basis for the inflation measures that Fed policymakers rely on when setting interest rates, and that determine cost-of-living increases in union contracts and Social Security benefits, among other uses.In its announcement on Tuesday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said that in addition to suspending data collection in three cities, it had reduced the amount of data it was collecting in the rest of the country by about 15 percent on average. All together, the cutbacks meant that the agency suspended collection on about 19 percent of its data in June, said Emily Liddel, an associate commissioner at the bureau.The cuts affected data on consumer products and on rents, both crucial information for policymakers.“The main takeaway for me is that their data collection problems were much worse than we thought,” Omair Sharif, founder of Inflation Insights, a forecasting firm, wrote in a note to clients on Wednesday.When the government can’t collect data on prices, it has to fill in the gaps with a statistical technique called “imputation.” The more data that must be imputed, the less reliable the overall numbers become.The bureau, which is part of the Labor Department, hasn’t provided a detailed explanation for the cuts, but has said it “makes reductions when current resources can no longer support the collection effort.” The agency recently announced it would stop publishing some data on wholesale prices, also because of resource constraints.Economists have become increasingly concerned about the federal statistical system in recent years. Response rates to government surveys have fallen steadily, gradually eroding the reliability of statistics based on that data. The agencies have been working to develop new techniques that rely less on surveys, but have been hampered by shrinking budgets.Those concerns predate the current administration, but have grown worse since President Trump returned to office. The Bureau of Labor Statistics and other federal statistical agencies have struggled with staff attrition as a result of the president’s freeze on federal hiring, combined with the buyouts he offered early in his term. The president’s budget also proposed further cuts to the bureau’s funding.Asked about the cuts on Wednesday, Jerome H. Powell, the Fed chair, said policymakers were “getting the data that we need to do our jobs.” But he stressed the importance of the federal statistical agencies.“The government data is really the gold standard in data,” he said. “We need it to be good and to be able to rely on it.”In an email on Wednesday, Ms. Liddel said the bureau had taken a number of steps to ensure “the quality of C.P.I. survey data in times of tight resources,” including collecting data online and exploring new data sources to replace traditional surveys.The bureau, in its announcement, indicated that the cutbacks have had only a minimal impact on the overall inflation numbers. A statistical analysis conducted by the agency found that suspending data collection in the three cities changed annual inflation estimates by less than one one-hundredth of a percentage point on average. The effects weren’t consistently in one direction; the cuts were more or less equally likely to push estimated inflation up and down.But that analysis didn’t examine the impact of the broader cutbacks in data collection, Mr. Sharif noted. He called the agency’s study “extremely limited.”“If that was meant to make us feel better about the quality of the C.P.I., it didn’t help,” he wrote.
Federal Reserve policymakers have stressed that their decisions on interest rates in coming months will depend on what happens in the economic data.Just one problem: That data may be becoming less reliable.The Bureau of Labor Statistics last month said it was reducing its collection of data on consumer prices, and had stopped gathering data entirely in several areas. On Tuesday, the agency provided more details on the cutbacks and indicated they were more significant than previously understood.Collecting the data that goes into the Consumer Price Index is a labor-intensive operation. Every month, a small army of government workers visits stores and other businesses across the country to check prices of eggs, underwear, haircuts and tens of thousands of other goods and services. The data collected is the basis for the inflation measures that Fed policymakers rely on when setting interest rates, and that determine cost-of-living increases in union contracts and Social Security benefits, among other uses.In its announcement on Tuesday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said that in addition to suspending data collection in three cities, it had reduced the amount of data it was collecting in the rest of the country by about 15 percent on average. All together, the cutbacks meant that the agency suspended collection on about 19 percent of its data in June, said Emily Liddel, an associate commissioner at the bureau.The cuts affected data on consumer products and on rents, both crucial information for policymakers.“The main takeaway for me is that their data collection problems were much worse than we thought,” Omair Sharif, founder of Inflation Insights, a forecasting firm, wrote in a note to clients on Wednesday.When the government can’t collect data on prices, it has to fill in the gaps with a statistical technique called “imputation.” The more data that must be imputed, the less reliable the overall numbers become.The bureau, which is part of the Labor Department, hasn’t provided a detailed explanation for the cuts, but has said it “makes reductions when current resources can no longer support the collection effort.” The agency recently announced it would stop publishing some data on wholesale prices, also because of resource constraints.Economists have become increasingly concerned about the federal statistical system in recent years. Response rates to government surveys have fallen steadily, gradually eroding the reliability of statistics based on that data. The agencies have been working to develop new techniques that rely less on surveys, but have been hampered by shrinking budgets.Those concerns predate the current administration, but have grown worse since President Trump returned to office. The Bureau of Labor Statistics and other federal statistical agencies have struggled with staff attrition as a result of the president’s freeze on federal hiring, combined with the buyouts he offered early in his term. The president’s budget also proposed further cuts to the bureau’s funding.Asked about the cuts on Wednesday, Jerome H. Powell, the Fed chair, said policymakers were “getting the data that we need to do our jobs.” But he stressed the importance of the federal statistical agencies.“The government data is really the gold standard in data,” he said. “We need it to be good and to be able to rely on it.”In an email on Wednesday, Ms. Liddel said the bureau had taken a number of steps to ensure “the quality of C.P.I. survey data in times of tight resources,” including collecting data online and exploring new data sources to replace traditional surveys.The bureau, in its announcement, indicated that the cutbacks have had only a minimal impact on the overall inflation numbers. A statistical analysis conducted by the agency found that suspending data collection in the three cities changed annual inflation estimates by less than one one-hundredth of a percentage point on average. The effects weren’t consistently in one direction; the cuts were more or less equally likely to push estimated inflation up and down.But that analysis didn’t examine the impact of the broader cutbacks in data collection, Mr. Sharif noted. He called the agency’s study “extremely limited.”“If that was meant to make us feel better about the quality of the C.P.I., it didn’t help,” he wrote.
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 1 August 2025 14:20 (three weeks ago)
eek sorry for the crap formatting
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 1 August 2025 14:21 (three weeks ago)
When the government can’t collect data on prices, it has to fill in the gaps with a statistical technique called “imputation.” The more data that must be imputed, the less reliable the overall numbers become.
they are guessing on way more prices than ever
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 1 August 2025 14:23 (three weeks ago)
My idiot congressman is out there tweeting END THE FED. Like it’s interest rates holding back investment and not the chaos goblin in the White House.
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Friday, 1 August 2025 15:40 (three weeks ago)
The jobs revisions for May and June look particularly dire._The economy added just 19,000 in May, a massive downward revision from the 144,00 initially thought.June job gains were revised down to 14,000, down from the 147,000 first estimated._https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/news/content/ar-AA1JITmG🕸🕸
_The economy added just 19,000 in May, a massive downward revision from the 144,00 initially thought.June job gains were revised down to 14,000, down from the 147,000 first estimated._
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/news/content/ar-AA1JITmG🕸🕸
So you can for sure count on the 73k added today to be adjusted down about 80% as well
― (•̪●) (carne asada), Friday, 1 August 2025 17:34 (three weeks ago)
*Larry Kudlow voice* See, the effects of the Biden economy lasted all the way til June. But 73k is actually a big uptick now!
― paper plans (tipsy mothra), Friday, 1 August 2025 17:43 (three weeks ago)
The turn against India is one of the craziest things.
India is all but locked out of the world's largest consumer market.Trump- Modi standoff hands China the prize.Read 👇🏼 https://t.co/yiUrSjdKQe pic.twitter.com/fF7ck2P8FK— menaka doshi (@menakadoshi) August 7, 2025
― xyzzzz__, Friday, 8 August 2025 13:16 (two weeks ago)
Modi and Trump, Gruesome Twosome.
― Corny Capitalism (Tom D.), Friday, 8 August 2025 13:26 (two weeks ago)
More Perfect Union ✧@moreperfectun✧✧✧.b✧✧✧.soc✧✧✧· 12mThe price of vegetables rose 38.9% in July.]
― sleeve, Thursday, 14 August 2025 15:46 (one week ago)
Grocery Outlet stock price up 38% this month
― sarahell, Thursday, 14 August 2025 16:21 (one week ago)
the consensus seems to be that the Fed is going to do a rate cut next month, which will really help kick this inflation into high gear
― whimsical skeedaddler (Moodles), Thursday, 14 August 2025 16:43 (one week ago)
Legendary Pink DotsDifficult days indeed. It seems that from August 29 to February 28 , 2026 it’s being made literally impossible to send packages to the U.S. without there being a risk of the poor receiver being punished with an ‘import duty’ of $80 to $200. Utter madness for sure, but these are mad times. Thankfully a U.S. Tour means we’ll bring what we can across the pond while we’ll work on a solution for those lovely homemade releases ( all US orders for ‘Monument’ are already sent.). We’ve been there before… Monsters in high places have scant regard for the little band / artist focused upon mere survival and making the planet a happier place.It means some patience in the months to come but , hell, it’s 45 years now - we’re not quitting for this crap!
― sleeve, Wednesday, 20 August 2025 20:08 (one week ago)
heard a radio interview with a woman who ordered her wedding dress online, with no idea it was going to be an import... and then the UPS driver told her to pay up for the tariffs, which was like hundreds of dollars, or he wouldn't release the dress.. she paid up
― Andy the Grasshopper, Wednesday, 20 August 2025 21:23 (one week ago)
Wtf dad?!
Man votes for Trump and torpedos his daughter’s business. pic.twitter.com/9TduHmXYlv— Tim Hannan (@TimHannan) August 21, 2025
― xyzzzz__, Thursday, 21 August 2025 14:45 (six days ago)
xp - I've seen two UK based smaller labels announce today on social media that they are pausing shipments to the USA "for the foreseeable future" due to the de minimis bullshit.
― better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 21 August 2025 15:23 (six days ago)
I’m pausing shipments outside the US. Now that I have EU distribution it doesn’t make sense to ship individual orders overseas.
― Instead of create and send out, it pull back and consume (unperson), Thursday, 21 August 2025 15:25 (six days ago)
As if I needed another reason to hate this fucker, but losing access to labels from around the world is really pissing me off. Such needless stupidity.
― better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 21 August 2025 15:27 (six days ago)
it's so pathetic that trump voters think he gives a flying fuck about sMaLl BuSiNeSs
― budo jeru, Thursday, 21 August 2025 15:43 (six days ago)
Wtf dad?!🐦[Man votes for Trump and torpedos his daughter’s business. pic.twitter.com/9TduHmXYlv🕸— Tim Hannan (@TimHannan) August 21, 2025🕸]🐦
🐦[Man votes for Trump and torpedos his daughter’s business. pic.twitter.com/9TduHmXYlv🕸— Tim Hannan (@TimHannan) August 21, 2025🕸]🐦
lol it’s not like Trump has been pushing tariffs for a decade now.
― Crispy Ambulance Chaser (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 21 August 2025 15:48 (six days ago)
Doing a good job of killing small business in DC
― Crispy Ambulance Chaser (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 21 August 2025 15:49 (six days ago)
classic Republican voter... bad things happen to someone else? comedy. bad thing happens to me or my family? tragedy!
― fluffy tufts university (f. hazel), Thursday, 21 August 2025 15:52 (six days ago)