― anthony easton (anthony), Thursday, 28 November 2002 22:29 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 28 November 2002 22:35 (twenty-three years ago)
the big Narnia question: should you read the books in the order they were written, or in the order in which they are set? well? you tell me?
― DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 28 November 2002 23:46 (twenty-three years ago)
ideally you should read the words in alphabetical order also
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 28 November 2002 23:48 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 28 November 2002 23:49 (twenty-three years ago)
The order in which they were written. In the same manner, one shouldn't watch the material in Godfather I + II in time-order either.
― Joe (Joe), Friday, 29 November 2002 00:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 29 November 2002 02:31 (twenty-three years ago)
― donna (donna), Friday, 29 November 2002 04:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― jon (jon), Friday, 29 November 2002 08:11 (twenty-three years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Friday, 29 November 2002 08:16 (twenty-three years ago)
Polyphonic there's a good thread about that somewhere. The summary: judging by the sample of readers who post to ILX, Narnia-as-parables are at best completely ineffective and at worst entirely counter-productive. The atheist can read them with conscience clear - if yr objection is the specific aesthetics of the parable-making then absolutely fair enough.
― Tom (Groke), Friday, 29 November 2002 10:05 (twenty-three years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 29 November 2002 10:20 (twenty-three years ago)
Personally, Narnia books helped me understand Christianity when I was a child, and coming to terms with the fact that Narnia wasn't real was good practice when the time came to abandon religion a few years later.
― Sam (chirombo), Friday, 29 November 2002 10:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Friday, 29 November 2002 10:40 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sam (chirombo), Friday, 29 November 2002 10:45 (twenty-three years ago)
Errr, DV, the whole of the end of 'Voyage of the Dawn Treader when they're sailing through, like 'The Elysian Fields' and meet, like, a little LAMB that is also Aslan and stuff...? I found it confusing when I first read it, because of being brought up completely heathen, but discovered the (not really SUB)text pretty soon after. And found it annoyingly transparent and useless as a narrative device.
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Friday, 29 November 2002 11:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― alext (alext), Friday, 29 November 2002 11:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 29 November 2002 11:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 29 November 2002 12:40 (twenty-three years ago)
Also - lots of implicit sexism. The magician tricks Polly into going off into another universe so he can guilt-trip Digory into Being The Man and rescuing her. And so on.
― caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 29 November 2002 14:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sam (chirombo), Friday, 29 November 2002 14:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 29 November 2002 14:29 (twenty-three years ago)
That was Lewis's defense in his essays. I think he honestly thought that the Christian story was a GOOD STORY, one of his very favorites in all the ways stories can be good. He incorporated it because he loved the story and because it was the entire foundation of his morality and his worldview, so even if he hadn't used such overt symbols it still probably would have ended up being a Christian story.
Whenever I say that in Lewis's defense, though, my dad says, "Oh yeah? Tolkein was responsible for Lewis's conversion, and he managed to write good fantasy that wasn't so annoying and obvious." Having not read LOTR (but intending to, I swear!) I can't answer.
I haven't read the Narnia books since elementary school. I disliked the middle few books. I wonder what I'd think now.
― Maria (Maria), Saturday, 30 November 2002 05:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 30 November 2002 10:26 (twenty-three years ago)
or: didn't Lewis hate at least some aspects of LotR, too?
What's weird is that I've read both these more than once and I don't know anything at all about the other Inklings. I don't even know their names. (I am assuming that some existed.)
― thom west (thom w), Saturday, 30 November 2002 11:31 (twenty-three years ago)
i know zero abt him
― mark s (mark s), Saturday, 30 November 2002 11:39 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Saturday, 30 November 2002 11:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 30 November 2002 12:17 (twenty-three years ago)
N.B. This is not true.
― N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 30 November 2002 12:48 (twenty-three years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Saturday, 30 November 2002 22:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― s trife (simon_tr), Saturday, 30 November 2002 22:48 (twenty-three years ago)
My favorite was Prince Caspian, FWIW. It's been years since I've read these things, though.
― Tad (llamasfur), Saturday, 30 November 2002 22:57 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Saturday, 30 November 2002 22:59 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Saturday, 30 November 2002 23:00 (twenty-three years ago)
I seem to remember that the preface/intro was written by one Owen Barfield, another Inkling, and a prominent Anthroposophist. I like the way both Williams and Barfield seem to take the existence of metaphysical realities as a given rather than pansying around with empty theological rhetoric (Aleister Crowley is another writer who shares this trait). One rather gets the impression that they knew what they were talking about, but I may be utterly mistaken.
Don't ask me why I didn't finish the book. Sheer laziness I expect.
― chris sallis, Saturday, 30 November 2002 23:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― s trife (simon_tr), Saturday, 30 November 2002 23:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Saturday, 30 November 2002 23:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― s trife (simon_tr), Saturday, 30 November 2002 23:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 30 November 2002 23:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― s trife (simon_tr), Sunday, 1 December 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tad (llamasfur), Sunday, 1 December 2002 00:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Sunday, 1 December 2002 00:10 (twenty-three years ago)
It is terrible that no one has mentioned Pauline Baynes' illustrations yet, as they are top.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 1 December 2002 00:17 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Sunday, 1 December 2002 00:24 (twenty-three years ago)
the beard, Narnian-style ;-p
― Tad (llamasfur), Sunday, 1 December 2002 00:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tad (llamasfur), Sunday, 1 December 2002 00:36 (twenty-three years ago)
ned youre peter and im edmund!!
Hey! I'm a wolf-killer and you eat candies.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 1 December 2002 00:47 (twenty-three years ago)
Tumnus singing "More Than a Feeling" = apocalypse
No Sta-Pufft Marshmallows for you!
― Tad (llamasfur), Sunday, 1 December 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Leee (Leee), Sunday, 1 December 2002 01:24 (twenty-three years ago)
Christianity - Industrial / Goth (or indiepop for the wooly Anglican version)Judaism - Stadium rockIslam - Hip-hopHinduism - Teen pop
― N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 1 December 2002 01:40 (twenty-three years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Sunday, 1 December 2002 22:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Sunday, 1 December 2002 23:05 (twenty-three years ago)
― jellybean (jellybean), Monday, 2 December 2002 00:35 (twenty-three years ago)
I'm going to have to reread them, I think.
Who remembers the TV series? Those I had on tape. I don't remember much except that the first one had A REAL LION, which was great..
― thom west (thom w), Monday, 2 December 2002 02:58 (twenty-three years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 2 December 2002 08:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 2 December 2002 08:58 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 2 December 2002 09:36 (twenty-three years ago)
Jadis = Christopher Hitchens?
― Sam (chirombo), Monday, 2 December 2002 10:09 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 2 December 2002 10:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sam (chirombo), Monday, 2 December 2002 11:14 (twenty-three years ago)
Umm Caitlin, Digory points out to his uncle that this is rub ect. at the time. Noting that people are societally expected to act in certain ways != sexism on Lewis' part. Far from it, in fact.
Am sure that Jadis is the Witch. It would be needless complication if it were a different powerful tall mental woman accidentally released into Narnia (or 'Eden' in allegorical terms) as its resident demon. And it all follows on - she 'plants' the iron bar from the London lamp-post and it grows into a new one. Circle of wotsit, innit.
Earrrgh those bleedin' TV adaptations of my favourite things. They will keep on doing them WRONG. Apart from Gormenghast which was made more obv. but not too badly. TLTWATW was k-rub, mainly because they made Lucy the most annoying girl in the world with buck teeth and other horridness. Lion was animatronic for the most part, I recall.
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Monday, 2 December 2002 13:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― Madchen (Madchen), Monday, 2 December 2002 13:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tad (llamasfur), Monday, 2 December 2002 13:17 (twenty-three years ago)
he's not a tame lion, you know ...
― Tad (llamasfur), Monday, 2 December 2002 13:23 (twenty-three years ago)
Assuming Jadis and the White Witch are the same (can't check) - is the witch in Silver Chair a supposed relation? She's described as being of the same 'type' - but given Jadis' origins how can this be?
― Tom (Groke), Monday, 2 December 2002 13:37 (twenty-three years ago)
I have just realised that my brother got the Narnia books so I can't check at home. Boo.
― Sam (chirombo), Monday, 2 December 2002 13:49 (twenty-three years ago)
Besides, maybe the Silver Chair witch -- or her descendants -- also hopped into the Narnia pond in the Wood Between the Worlds (a great concept, BTW). Or because she's a witch, she came from God knows where and just sorta ended up in Narnia -- she could have just as easily ended up in Newcastle or Nebraska for all anyone knows.
― Tad (llamasfur), Monday, 2 December 2002 14:09 (twenty-three years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 2 December 2002 14:16 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 2 December 2002 14:16 (twenty-three years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Monday, 2 December 2002 14:17 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sam (chirombo), Monday, 2 December 2002 14:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Monday, 2 December 2002 14:41 (twenty-three years ago)
"The former occupant of these premises, the Faun Tumnus, is under arrest and awaiting his trial on a charge of High Treason against her Imperial Majesty Jadis, Queen of Narnia, Chatelaine of Cair Paravel, Empress of the Lone Islands, etc., also of comforting her said Majesty's enemies, harbouring spies and fraternizing with Humans.signed MAUGRIM, Captain of the Secret PoliceLONG LIVE THE QUEEN!"
blimey this is good.
― thom west (thom w), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 00:41 (twenty-three years ago)
"That's what I don't understand, Mr Beaver," said Peter, "I mean isn't the Witch herself human?""She'd like us to believe it," said Mr Beaver, "and it's on that that she bases her claim to be Queen. But she's no Daughter of Eve. She comes of your father Adam's" - (here Mr Beaver bowed) - "your father Adam's first wife, her they called Lilith. And she was one of the Jinn. That's what she comes from on one side. And on the other she comes of the giants. No, no, there isn't a drop of real human blood in the Witch."
― thom west (thom w), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 00:56 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sam (chirombo), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 09:58 (twenty-three years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 11:26 (twenty-three years ago)
:(((
― fe zaffe (fezaffe), Thursday, 7 July 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 7 July 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 7 July 2005 19:03 (twenty years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 7 July 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 7 July 2005 19:11 (twenty years ago)
this could be a problem
― kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 7 July 2005 19:11 (twenty years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 7 July 2005 19:15 (twenty years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 7 July 2005 19:16 (twenty years ago)
― latebloomer: the Clonus Horror (latebloomer), Thursday, 7 July 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)
― Tigerstyle Shamanic Vision Quester (sexyDancer), Thursday, 7 July 2005 19:25 (twenty years ago)
― Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 7 July 2005 20:01 (twenty years ago)
I found Shrek to be rather well directed.
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 7 July 2005 20:06 (twenty years ago)
I used to have - maybe still do somewhere - these excellent talking-book readings by Michael Hordern, with Marisa Robles harp and flute music behind him. An excellent way to experience them, Hordern having just the right august tones.
― Tom May (Tom May), Friday, 8 July 2005 00:18 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 18 August 2005 08:30 (twenty years ago)
― N_RQ, Thursday, 18 August 2005 08:38 (twenty years ago)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 18 August 2005 08:54 (twenty years ago)
Am I right to feel TEH PH3AR? I know it's just a big opportunity for all the rights-holders to hoover up any stray dollars LOTR left on the table but I feel extra-prickly about Xtian propaganda these days, however crypto or likely to be elided in the name of good family entertainment...
― rogermexico (rogermexico), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 15:23 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)
― beanz (beanz), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 15:28 (twenty years ago)
This is one of my favorite comments ever. Cheers Mr. Trife!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)
uhm, you do remember what C.S. Lewis was like, right? sure, the story certainly had allegory, but there's no way in fuck that it should be considered anywhere in the same category as serialized shit like Left Behind.
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 15:35 (twenty years ago)
Whereas iirc Narnia enchants, delights, and beguiles. As I suggest, my issue is less with the source or with the current project (which is driven by PROFOUNDLY secular ends) than with the timing. I'm feeling pretty beset these days what with the passions of the intelligent design0rz and the general cockiness and muscle-flexing and forcing-it-on-the-rest-of-usitude of the xtian right in general (vis. the current case before the Supremes).
Which makes me more cynical than I'd like to be about robust, noble, gorgeously backlit golden lions with flowing manes. Is all.
― rogermexico (rogermexico), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 16:03 (twenty years ago)
Why thank you.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 16:04 (twenty years ago)
― jeffrey (johnson), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)
wait, so the only measure here is how ostensibly hidden the efforts at proselytzing the reader? it's all a matter of overtness?
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 16:33 (twenty years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 18:22 (twenty years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 18:54 (twenty years ago)
rip pauline baynes :(
http://www.dnwfriends.nzl.org/dnwbooks/imagesnba8/magiciannephew.jpg
― thomp, Thursday, 7 August 2008 06:54 (seventeen years ago)
Very sad. :-( Also Tolkien's favorite illustrator of his work. A full life lived, though.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 7 August 2008 07:01 (seventeen years ago)