Should I buy these boots?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.kennethcole.com/img/prod/KM22934LE.jpg

I can't really justify $174 for a pair of boots, but I really dig them.

Chris V. (Chris V), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 14:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Are you in the Beatles?

Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 14:51 (twenty-two years ago)

They're nice. Do you have $174 to spend?

Mark C (Mark C), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 14:51 (twenty-two years ago)

yes. you can never have too many chelsea boots.

those are lovely boots. i want them... dammit, i don't actually own a pair of chelsea boots in brown, but if i started getting into brown chelsea boots, then i'd really be in trouble.

i've already got four pairs with me here. and another three pairs back in storage in ny. i mean, how do you pick just one pair of chelsea boots, when you have the options of cuban heeled or flat, round, square or superpointy cock-roach killer toed... gah, don't make me have to get all those options in BROWN as well now...

::kate's head explodes::

(i used to tease our bassist about her addiction to trainers, saying that i was above such petty things as shoe fetishes. until i started unpacking my chelsea boots and oh how she laffed...)

kate, Tuesday, 3 December 2002 14:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I can ask for them for x-mas from the wife.

Chris V. (Chris V), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 15:16 (twenty-two years ago)

She'll shoot me down on that one though.

Chris V. (Chris V), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 15:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I would love if my bf asked me for kenneth cole boots for x-mas! I'm always trying to buy him nice clothes but he won't have it. $174 isn't completely ludicrous if you'll get the use out of them.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 15:31 (twenty-two years ago)

They look like girly shoes.

, Tuesday, 3 December 2002 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)

p.s. go shop at Bluefly, they often have lovely boots.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 15:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I would love if my bf asked me for kenneth cole boots for x-mas! I'm always trying to buy him nice clothes but he won't have it.

I would be really pleased if the boy-toy asked for clothes or shoes for x-mas, you should give it a shot. I think you would have a good chance of getting them (if they are within your wife's price range).

Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 15:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm so jealous of your boot collection, kate.
I just bought my first pair of boots a couple of weeks ago at Payless for $15.
What I really want is some fancy tall boots. Every winter I go window shopping for pretty boots, but it's hard to find my size. Plus, obviously, they're always really expensive. Poor me!

Sarah McLusky (coco), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)

All my Kenneth Cole shoes get good wear out of them, so much so that my pair of loafers have holes in the bottoms and I still wear them. They are too comfortable to throw away. Plus they are called "Pleasure Slips".

Chris V. (Chris V), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)

no, don't buy them, make do with what you've got and buy some CD's instead.

jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 18:08 (twenty-two years ago)

there is absolutely nothing I want to buy cd wise right now. I just purchased my missing Love cd's and that was all that was on my list.

Chris V. (Chris V), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 18:19 (twenty-two years ago)

sigh. i miss my tall boots. i had two pairs (of course... boot fetish, me?) - a vintage pair of knee-high black leather boots with chunky heels which my ex-boyfriend used to refer to as the "Nico Boots" coz they were indeed shiny shiny boots of leather aaaahhhh... i loved them so much. i inherited them from my mother, who actually had them MADE for her on carnaby st. in the 60s. i also had a plasticy pvc pair of WHITE KNEE-HIGH BOOTS a la nancy sinatra which were just about guaranteed to render any garage/mod boy to a state of drooling lust in a matter of moments.

and i wonder why i always ended up with garage/mod boys, and not the dronerock boys i so craved... dronerock boots are unmoved by cool boots.

kate, Tuesday, 3 December 2002 18:21 (twenty-two years ago)

no, don't buy them, make do with what you've got and buy some CD's instead.

Jel is right once again! Just the other day, I decided against buying something that would've cost $50; I was so proud myself that I spent $50 worth of CDs as a reward.

there is absolutely nothing I want to buy cd wise right now.

Surely you are missing some Force MDs singles?

Andy K (Andy K), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 18:29 (twenty-two years ago)

haha!!!

Chris V. (Chris V), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 18:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey, I found similiar boots at Aldo online for $79. Yipeee!!!!!

Chris V. (Chris V), Tuesday, 3 December 2002 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)

no no you need wagnerian glam kitsch boots by fritz lang!!!

http://www.lili.uni-bielefeld.de/~zeitung/kitsch.jpg

let the wind go through your hair...

dakatin, Tuesday, 3 December 2002 21:14 (twenty-two years ago)

i really want some very pointy boots. tall ones. with big heels.

Maria (Maria), Wednesday, 4 December 2002 17:15 (twenty-two years ago)

four years pass...

Hey, those Chris V. boots look alot like the ones Nick was talking about on his masculine fashion thread.

What do we think of these?
http://www.zappos.com/images/735/7358775/6220-501488-p.jpg
http://www.zappos.com/images/734/7345475/6219-474604-d.jpg

(for me, not him!)

I tried on a ton of boots at DSW yesterday, but everything either had too high a heel or was too boring or crazy for me.
Maybe I should just give up on tall boots this year and buy these cuties?
http://www.zappos.com/images/734/7345468/6901-474588-d.jpg

KitCat, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:24 (seventeen years ago)

I like the middle pair v much, Sarah! It's hard to find that lowish heel in a good shape, and I like that one.

Laurel, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:38 (seventeen years ago)

Yes, they aren't chunky or teetering. They are also the most expensive. You have good taste.

KitCat, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:40 (seventeen years ago)

Okay boots:

http://www.duoboots.com/images/2007/boots/2_casual_naples_1.jpg

They are from Duo Boots and they are pricey pricey BUT you can custom order the calf size, which is key for me since I have hard time finding tall boots that fit over my freakishly large calves.

Sarah - I like the top ones, but that's because I'm allergic to heels.

Jenny, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:41 (seventeen years ago)

Haha, or at least moderately expensive taste. The care for line & proportion shows in the ankle & heel vicinity, I happen to like what I see there. I think the top pair are very handsome too.

JENNY I LOVE THOSE. They are not for me but I like v v much, PLUS custom calf is NECESSARY.

Laurel, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:43 (seventeen years ago)

Nice.

One cool thing about my top boots is the 16" shaft, as I'm a Tally Shore.

KitCat, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:44 (seventeen years ago)

ooh adjustable calf size boots! that is awesome. i found a pair of boots last year that actually fit my calves (opposite problem, stick legs) and spent $400 on them just because i had never before had boots that didn't look ridiculous and baggy.

(i am NOT buying new boots this year, those ones better last me a decade)

bell_labs, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:45 (seventeen years ago)

I also like these and these, but they look kind of stuff in the foot part (the... upper?) and I'm kind of loathe to order expensive custom boots from foreign lands only to have to mail them back because they hurt my tooties.

Ya, I'm willing to shell out the bucks for those because I'm assuming they'll last a long-ass time.

Jenny, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:47 (seventeen years ago)

Okay, between these http://www.duoboots.com/images/2007/boots/2_dress_odessa_27.jpg

and these http://www.duoboots.com/images/2007/boots/2_casual_bologna_1.jpg

I may have just fulfilled all my boot needs forever.

Laurel, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:48 (seventeen years ago)

those bottom ones are so great! the top ones look a little dominatrixy.

bell_labs, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:50 (seventeen years ago)

I love patent leather.

Laurel, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:51 (seventeen years ago)

I also have large calves. The zippers were pinching at my skin at DSW. I am telling myself those large calves are necessary to support my amazon body.

xpost - ooh patent!
I saw quite a few boots yesterday in the style of shoe + boot leg, if tha tmakes any sense. I like the way your second pair handles that trend, making the shaft more of a legwarmer of sorts.

KitCat, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:51 (seventeen years ago)

those bottom ones are so great! the top ones look a little dominatrixy.

otm on both counts.

if anyone with time to kill wants to find me a new pair of boots i'll be in need soon enough.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:52 (seventeen years ago)

sarah, i really like the last pair you posted, wouldn't they be tall enough to protect from the elements?

i like the merrell pirate boots, will try to find a photo in a minute.

xp-- kevin, what are you looking for? dressy winter boots? snow boots? toby needs boots as well, but we don't know where to start so boy boot photos will be useful to him as well.

colette, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:54 (seventeen years ago)

Laurel, you would totally rock those top boots.

Jenny, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:55 (seventeen years ago)

Nick looked at boots at DSW as well but didn't find any he loved. BOYS be needin' boots.

Colette, they have an 11" shaft, so yes. It's just funny because my goal had been new tall boots (my black ones I got a few years ago got all scratched up - actually wore them quite a bit).

KitCat, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:57 (seventeen years ago)

sometime in my life, i want to own a pair of above-the-knee boots. i know they kind of straddle the trashy/hot line though, but i've seen a few people pull them off and look absolutely sexy and not at all like a cheap tramp.

bell_labs, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:57 (seventeen years ago)

xp-- kevin, what are you looking for? dressy winter boots? snow boots? toby needs boots as well, but we don't know where to start so boy boot photos will be useful to him as well.

just a pair of boots to replace my doc's that are wearing down in the heel.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:58 (seventeen years ago)

I like the boots that Chris V. posted at the top. A lot.

n/a, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:01 (seventeen years ago)

I wonder if they are still made.

n/a, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:01 (seventeen years ago)

That's nice, dear. Find out who makes them.

Update!
I am leaning towards my middle boots right now. Maybe I'll get the third pair for xmas...

KitCat, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:01 (seventeen years ago)

http://cdn.overstock.com/images/products/P10825972.jpg
something like these...not trampy, just kind of equestrian

bell_labs, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:04 (seventeen years ago)

Based on the URL, they are Kenneth Cole.

n/a, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:04 (seventeen years ago)

bell labs, would over the knee boots make it hard to walk? i'm imagining it would be like wearing hip-waders or something.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:07 (seventeen years ago)

They have some similar ones on the KC website but they are more expensive.

n/a, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:07 (seventeen years ago)

sarah, i liked the middle boots best!

chicago kevin, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:08 (seventeen years ago)

Those are cute, but personally I have enough trouble walking in tennis shoes as it is.

Thanks, Kev! Hey... are you just saying that because I said I was leaning towards those?

KitCat, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:08 (seventeen years ago)

fuck, how hard is it to find a decent pair of chelsea boots that aren't ungodly expensive?

xpost- no, i meant to say that before i swears!

chicago kevin, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:08 (seventeen years ago)

that's a good question. i think they usually are bendy at the knee...i've never even tried them on though.

bell_labs, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:08 (seventeen years ago)

how hard is it to find a decent pair of chelsea boots that aren't ungodly expensive?

kinda hard. toby got a pair of something in that family at ravel in london last year, but like most chelsea boots they have a smooth sole and only go up to ankle bone, so i'm not sure they're the best 'chicago in january' boots.

why don't you just get another pair of docs?

colette, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:12 (seventeen years ago)

the docs i have now are chelsea boots and they stopped making them. they're great fucking boots though.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:13 (seventeen years ago)

what is chelsea boots

n/a, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:14 (seventeen years ago)

i do not like what dr. marten's has chosen as the replacement to my great boots.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:15 (seventeen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelsea_boot

chicago kevin, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:15 (seventeen years ago)

just a pair of boots to replace my doc's that are wearing down in the heel.

Could you just get the heel repaired/replaced?

Jenny, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:15 (seventeen years ago)

Oh ok I like chelsea boots.

n/a, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:17 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.zappos.com/images/737/7371510/6901-529363-d.jpg

I mean can you really go wrong with a boot named "Lumberjack"?

dan m, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:17 (seventeen years ago)

those vegetarian shoes ones in the link look kind of like docs, do they still make those?

colette, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:18 (seventeen years ago)

To be honest, if I'm at the stage where I'm forced to eat my boots, I'm probably not going to be worrying about if they're vegetarian or not.

n/a, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:19 (seventeen years ago)

Nick, just save up for those BLundstones you wanted.

KitCat, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:20 (seventeen years ago)

Nick, I explained Chelsea boots in the last thread you asked about shoes in. :)

Laurel, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:20 (seventeen years ago)

that duoboots site is neat! do they ship to USA? i have the problem of most boots too wide for my calves, and my last tall pair are really near worn out, i've had them 5 or 6 years now.

daria-g, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:20 (seventeen years ago)

jenny, i'd considered that because i really hate shopping for shoes but it's not just the heel, that's just the part that's going fastest so ;_; for me.

colette, i noticed that but that stupid fucking pull on strap is disproportionately large in my estimate. plus the tag has noticeable branding on it which in conjunction with the hugeness of it is a dealbreaker.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:21 (seventeen years ago)

do they ship to USA?

Yes!

Jenny, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:26 (seventeen years ago)

i found my current boots

http://i.shoebuy.com/pi/drmar/drmar43605_lg.jpg

but We're sorry -- no color of this style is currently available. You can click "Notify me when my size is available" if you want us to let you know when the size and color you seek is available.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:32 (seventeen years ago)

Barstids. Well, click anyway, maybe it'll be within a useful time-frame.

Laurel, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:33 (seventeen years ago)

woah, i just found an AWESOME pair but they were $320 before tax and shipping. i bought an '82 mazda for less than that.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:44 (seventeen years ago)

fuck it, i'm going barefoot.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 18 October 2007 15:45 (seventeen years ago)

Kevin, those boots look AWESOME.

nathalie, Thursday, 18 October 2007 16:07 (seventeen years ago)

they are great boots but they've DEFINITELY seen better days. i just dug mine out and the soles are worn down considerably and i don't know what the hell that stain is on the right boot, road salt? bird shit? paint?

time for new boots.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 18 October 2007 16:18 (seventeen years ago)

MY NEW BOOTS

http://image.www.rakuten.co.jp/footone/img10564033354.jpeg

moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 18 October 2007 16:24 (seventeen years ago)

though i got oily dark brown leather instead of distressed beeswax leather

moonship journey to baja, Thursday, 18 October 2007 16:25 (seventeen years ago)

my new boot look like this

http://site.barkslope.com/images/blogimages/reflectivebootsmain.jpg

a puppy, Thursday, 18 October 2007 16:50 (seventeen years ago)

my dog had boots when he lived in chicago but he hated them. he hated them more than he hated the snow.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 18 October 2007 17:09 (seventeen years ago)

not boots, but these are my current unattainable crush:

http://www.matchesfashion.com/catalogue/productdetail/matches_aw07_ladies_shoes_christianlouboutin_19_cl_0002_blu_560

i'd be nearly 5'11" in them!!

lauren, Thursday, 18 October 2007 17:27 (seventeen years ago)

I am 5'11"!

Pretty shade of blue. 5'11" or not, I don't think I could walk in those.

KitCat, Thursday, 18 October 2007 18:15 (seventeen years ago)

I ended up ordering the second boots I posted in black, BTW. They are via zappos, so I can always switch 'em out.

KitCat, Thursday, 18 October 2007 18:18 (seventeen years ago)

They will probably arrive today. eep!

KitCat, Friday, 19 October 2007 13:47 (seventeen years ago)

I want the boots pictured in the 'boots' section here SO MUCH, but they took them away from me before I could decide whether I should spend money on *suede* boots when I only need boots to stop my feet getting wet in the rain..

http://www.kurtgeiger.com/icat/1

Not the real Village People, Saturday, 20 October 2007 14:08 (seventeen years ago)

Nice!

Ok, so I chose BADLY. The boots I got were very cute from the ankle down, but were entirely too wide in the calves. I took photos but decided there was no point in posting them as I'd already made up my mind. Back to the drawing (shopping) board!

KitCat, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:47 (seventeen years ago)

wear beatle boots

burt_stanton, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:49 (seventeen years ago)

Ok, what do we think about these?
http://www.zappos.com/images/734/7347948/6901-479793-p.jpg

KitCat, Friday, 26 October 2007 17:36 (seventeen years ago)

adorable!

horseshoe, Friday, 26 October 2007 17:36 (seventeen years ago)

Hell-o.

Mark C, Friday, 26 October 2007 17:38 (seventeen years ago)

That heel shape is a little too kooky for me, I don't like when they curve back out at the bottoms unless they are very clearly period (like 1930s) shoes. Also...are those STRETCH shafts?

Laurel, Friday, 26 October 2007 17:40 (seventeen years ago)

What about the tall pair with flat soles and the D buckles?

Laurel, Friday, 26 October 2007 17:41 (seventeen years ago)

I am very very picky and do not have any nice black boots anymore, partly because I am so picky and the only boots I like are ridic prices. So feel free to ignore me. :D

Laurel, Friday, 26 October 2007 17:45 (seventeen years ago)

Still a possibility, though I can't decide if they are feminine enough for me.

KitCat, Friday, 26 October 2007 17:46 (seventeen years ago)

Sarah, look at fryeboots.com. See what you think. They're not cheap, but neither were that other pair you ordered, if I remember correctly...?

Laurel, Friday, 26 October 2007 17:51 (seventeen years ago)

Them're swell boots, Ms. Cat. Are they leather? Do they stretch? I have a pair sort like that (well, some boots w/no zippers) and I feel immodest making and inadvertently attention-getting display peeling them off when I need to reduce the internal temperature of my overly-warm legs & feets.

Abbott, Friday, 26 October 2007 17:59 (seventeen years ago)

The problem here is that if they stretch, they're not leather. They're synthetic.

Laurel, Friday, 26 October 2007 18:03 (seventeen years ago)

Which might be why they seem hot!

Laurel, Friday, 26 October 2007 18:07 (seventeen years ago)

They zip up on the inner side of the leg. Also, I'm guessing they are synthetic because they are "stretch" and very inexpensive.

KitCat, Friday, 26 October 2007 19:50 (seventeen years ago)

two months pass...

does anyone know who in nyc would have a large selection of frye boots? most places seem to carry just one or two styles.

bell_labs, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 20:32 (seventeen years ago)

The place on 72nd St where I got mine had a bunch. Between Columbus & Amsterdam, I'm pretty sure. A nicer version of one of those David Z. sorts of places.

Laurel, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 20:54 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.fryeboots.com/subpages/images/77431COG.jpg
i'm pretty into this style

bell_labs, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 20:59 (seventeen years ago)

i don't know if the heel would be too much for me, though

bell_labs, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 21:00 (seventeen years ago)

Won't know til you try! Another ILXor picked up a pair of harness boots like mine...lookin' good.

Laurel, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 21:01 (seventeen years ago)

The place on 72nd St where I got mine had a bunch. Between Columbus & Amsterdam, I'm pretty sure.

this is Tip Top Shoes, presumably. if that fails, you could try Harry's Shoes, at 83rd and Bway.

gabbneb, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 21:07 (seventeen years ago)

last time I went to Harry's the salesman personally owned a pair of at least three of the four shoes I looked at. amazing, rite?

gabbneb, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 21:08 (seventeen years ago)

i am NOT buying new boots this year, those ones better last me a decade)

-- bell_labs, Thursday, October 18, 2007 2:45 PM (2 months ago) Bookmark Link

haha this was lies

bell_labs, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 21:10 (seventeen years ago)

BL those boots are fantastic. I'm really tempted to get those Miu Miu spectatorish ballerinas *if* they are on sale.

stevienixed, Wednesday, 2 January 2008 21:36 (seventeen years ago)

http://imgs.yoox.biz/44/440888422P_2.jpg
i bought these boots. not fryes but they were on sale like whoa. the heel is 4 inches which is a lot for me, but they seem really comfortable!

bell_labs, Thursday, 3 January 2008 20:14 (seventeen years ago)

comfortable 4 inch heels!
they are hot

rrrobyn, Thursday, 3 January 2008 20:16 (seventeen years ago)

i know! it was shocking. the toes have a nice rubber bottom so they are not slippery, which is usually my problem with heels.

bell_labs, Thursday, 3 January 2008 20:17 (seventeen years ago)

i wld like a pair in dark brown with dark brown heel

rrrobyn, Thursday, 3 January 2008 20:18 (seventeen years ago)

labs, I actually like those much better than the Frye ones, I have big negative feelings for heel shapes that curve back out at the bottom.

Laurel, Thursday, 3 January 2008 20:19 (seventeen years ago)

i actually have another pair of boots by that brand, l'autre chose. i luv them too. they seem to fit me really well.

bell_labs, Thursday, 3 January 2008 20:22 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCF3ywukQYA

omg shoes

HI DERE, Thursday, 3 January 2008 20:37 (seventeen years ago)

i have yet to find dress boots. there's something wrong with every pair that i like upon closer inspection - weird seams, a buckle, kitten heels, lace-up detail lurking on the back, etc etc. or else they cost $900. gah!

lauren, Thursday, 3 January 2008 20:38 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.classicboots.com/moto/images/hp14.jpg

XD

Pål Útlendi, Friday, 4 January 2008 00:25 (seventeen years ago)

I might buy these soon:

http://www.bananarepublic.com/Asset_Archive/BRWeb/Assets/Product/547/547920/alternate/br547920-01av2v01.jpg

Mr. Goodman, Friday, 4 January 2008 00:28 (seventeen years ago)

I like those, the toe and heel are perfect.

Spencer Chow, Friday, 4 January 2008 00:50 (seventeen years ago)

they look great. i always thought shoes for men with no laces looked silly. too old fashioned maybe. i think i'm ready.

Slumpman, Friday, 4 January 2008 01:15 (seventeen years ago)

If you want to order:

http://www.bananarepublic.com/browse/product.do?cid=16191&pid=547920&scid=547920012

$158!

Mr. Goodman, Friday, 4 January 2008 01:21 (seventeen years ago)

one month passes...

boots. tell me where i can buy some. there must be sales somewhere.

(the ones i bought upthread are too tall for everyday wear. and my other flat ones, after wearing them over jeans once, are now stretched out and slouchy)

bell_labs, Friday, 8 February 2008 17:08 (seventeen years ago)

there must be sales somewhere.

so, this is a new york-specific question? Because in the larger sense, yes, you are correct. There must.

kenan, Friday, 8 February 2008 17:21 (seventeen years ago)

ha yes ny specific. i can't buy shoes without trying them on.

bell_labs, Friday, 8 February 2008 17:26 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, especially not boots, they tend to size weird

kenan, Friday, 8 February 2008 17:30 (seventeen years ago)

bump. yall are holding out on me!

bell_labs, Friday, 8 February 2008 20:16 (seventeen years ago)

ten months pass...

http://images.channeladvisor.com/Sell/SSProfiles/60056308/images/78/308858.jpg

yes: I do live in Texas
no: I live in Texas

sad man in him room (milo z), Thursday, 11 December 2008 21:11 (sixteen years ago)

i like those but suede is pretty impractical & also, i just don't like it as much as leather. i just bought some vintage ropers this week actually.

jed_, Thursday, 11 December 2008 21:18 (sixteen years ago)

They're goat leather.

sad man in him room (milo z), Thursday, 11 December 2008 21:20 (sixteen years ago)

maybe it's the close-up/angle, but the soles are pretty funny-looking

very very serious (gabbneb), Thursday, 11 December 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago)

i mean, that kind of sole on that kind of boot

very very serious (gabbneb), Thursday, 11 December 2008 21:23 (sixteen years ago)

the soles are my favorite part! not sure about the color though, it's very bright.

Maria, Thursday, 11 December 2008 21:58 (sixteen years ago)

aren't cowboy boat soles supposed to be flush with the upper? these look like cowboy boots on a dress oxford platform.

very very serious (gabbneb), Thursday, 11 December 2008 22:00 (sixteen years ago)

They're ropers, not riding boots. I like them, although I'm not sure I can picture anyone I know wearing 'em.

One Community Service Mummy, hold the Straightedge Merman (Laurel), Thursday, 11 December 2008 22:02 (sixteen years ago)

ok, it just looks like suede or nubuck in the photo but they look like they wouldn't age so well, much like suede. they look like they are $$$, am i right?

jed_, Thursday, 11 December 2008 22:20 (sixteen years ago)

$239, I think - Lucchese Classics are usually in the $400+ range.

Lots of dough to spend on something I'm not completely sure of. Maybe I should e-mail it to my mom and see if they're still shopping for Christmas.

sad man in him room (milo z), Thursday, 11 December 2008 22:25 (sixteen years ago)

They're ropers, not riding boots

while i do not speak your funny languages, i look up these mr roper boot and see welt-stitching or similar, rather than 'cowboy boots on a dress oxford platform'

they do look nice otherwise, i think

very very serious (gabbneb), Thursday, 11 December 2008 22:25 (sixteen years ago)

actually i kind of agree with gabbneb. the sole is kind of too fancy for the boot and makes it look like a bit of a daft hybrid whereas ropers are working boots and should look like working boots.

although cowboy boots are working boots too and are often very fancy so maybe i'm wrong.

jed_, Thursday, 11 December 2008 22:37 (sixteen years ago)

four years pass...

Its boot time. Funny how ten years ago I couldn't afford nor justify spending $174 for boots. Well i just bought wolverine 1000 miles. Best $385 I ever spent.

thebingo, Thursday, 24 October 2013 16:41 (eleven years ago)

You should buy these boots:

http://www.antiquemapsandprints.com/scansj/j-20623.jpg

Aimless, Thursday, 24 October 2013 17:23 (eleven years ago)

I have these boots:

http://www.lowaboots.com/images/products/3109454554_l.jpg

c21m50nh3x460n, Thursday, 24 October 2013 22:51 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.