What is the world coming to when a dirty, interfering, cut of a shit musician is recognised like this?
― Lara (Lara), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 15:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 15:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 15:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 15:29 (twenty-two years ago)
My neighbour at home in Mericky is an Englishman who basically invented medical ultrasound, he gets 'nominated' loads too for the Science bit.
― suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 15:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― cprek (cprek), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 15:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)
(I didn't know there were innumerable nominations - not that it makes it much easier to stomach)
― Lara (Lara), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:19 (twenty-two years ago)
Y'know, Yasser Arafat got one of those, kept it proudly on display in his office...before the IDF blew it to smithereens.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:38 (twenty-two years ago)
A love pocket could be anything... like that small pocket in jeans for condoms, for example.
― Lara (Lara), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:41 (twenty-two years ago)
You're still an ethical thief, Lara Byrne.
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:50 (twenty-two years ago)
I stole no one's moral code. If you've strayed from the path it's no one's fault but your own.
― Lara (Lara), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 16:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 17:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 17:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 17:04 (twenty-two years ago)
Maybe Ken Livingstone should get it.
― the pinefox, Wednesday, 19 February 2003 17:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick A. (Nick A.), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 17:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 17:28 (twenty-two years ago)
Obviously the Nobel Committee will have to swayed by the "Electrical Storm" video w/Samantha Morton.
― Amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 17:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick A. (Nick A.), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 19:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick A. (Nick A.), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 20:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:04 (twenty-two years ago)
;)
― cprek (cprek), Thursday, 20 February 2003 00:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― wutchootawkinboutwillis (wutchootawkinboutwillis), Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Thursday, 20 February 2003 08:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 February 2003 08:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Thursday, 20 February 2003 08:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 February 2003 08:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Thursday, 20 February 2003 08:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 February 2003 08:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Thursday, 20 February 2003 08:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 February 2003 09:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Thursday, 20 February 2003 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Thursday, 20 February 2003 09:21 (twenty-two years ago)
Aye, and I'd hope you didn't hate me! Least not til Nick Aid 2015.
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 February 2003 09:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Thursday, 20 February 2003 09:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 February 2003 09:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Thursday, 20 February 2003 09:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 February 2003 09:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 20 February 2003 15:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 20 February 2003 15:33 (twenty-two years ago)
Ah, so would I. But since my good kicking leg permanently out of commission, I will have to settle for dropping a bowling ball on his feet.
― Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 20 February 2003 15:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 15:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Thursday, 20 February 2003 15:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:03 (twenty-two years ago)
"I WANNA DIP MY BALLS IN IT"
I'd have attached a picture of Louie, but I came up empty when searching. =/
- Alan
― Alan Conceicao, Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Friday, 21 February 2003 09:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 21 February 2003 13:38 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/02/images/20060202_p020206pm-0095-515h.jpg
From his appearance at the 54th Annual Nat'l Prayer Breakfast.
Still, as some have pointed out, the guy is willing & able to down with anybody to talk about his causes.
― kingfish has gene rayburn's mic (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 3 February 2006 19:07 (nineteen years ago)
― kingfish has gene rayburn's mic (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 3 February 2006 19:12 (nineteen years ago)
― DV (dirtyvicar), Friday, 3 February 2006 19:15 (nineteen years ago)
― tehresa (tehresa), Friday, 3 February 2006 19:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Freud Junior, former drummer for Gay Dad (Freud Junior), Friday, 3 February 2006 21:22 (nineteen years ago)
― j.lu (j.lu), Friday, 3 February 2006 23:15 (nineteen years ago)
14678 answers
― kingfish du lac (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 7 July 2006 17:29 (nineteen years ago)
Time to go check drudgereport, fox news & malkin
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE5981JK20091009
― StanM, Friday, 9 October 2009 09:16 (sixteen years ago)
Aren't they giving this to him a bit early? He has done a lot of rhetorical stuff, but in a number of key areas it seems to be still same-old, same-old.
― The Real Dirty Vicar, Friday, 9 October 2009 09:18 (sixteen years ago)
Not Bono then?
― Obscured by clowns (NickB), Friday, 9 October 2009 09:27 (sixteen years ago)
quick
― conrad, Friday, 9 October 2009 09:27 (sixteen years ago)
Starting now, I'm going to say a lot of high-minded pacifist things in public this year so I can win next year's prize.
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 9 October 2009 09:28 (sixteen years ago)
This is silly. Especially as he's just about to ramp up in Afghanistan.
― Zelda Zonk, Friday, 9 October 2009 09:41 (sixteen years ago)
He did extend the hand of peace to those goth girls. Maybe that swung it for him?
― Obscured by clowns (NickB), Friday, 9 October 2009 09:43 (sixteen years ago)
kneejerk reaction to a us president not being gwb
― Brewer's Bitch (darraghmac), Friday, 9 October 2009 09:44 (sixteen years ago)
Has this been done purely to rile up the haters? If so, I approve.
― Ned Trifle (Notinmyname), Friday, 9 October 2009 09:55 (sixteen years ago)
sounds like SOME committee has been reading our "favorite contributor to NR's the corner" thread
― i got nothin (deej), Friday, 9 October 2009 09:56 (sixteen years ago)
hahahaha LOL am in Mpls and LOL at my mom; let the kvetching begin.
― edward everett horton hears a who (suzy), Friday, 9 October 2009 10:01 (sixteen years ago)
My first reaction is "uggh" and the press announcement saying that it's b/c he's giving hope to the world makes it double uggh. One way to defend the "hope" explanation is that Obama's campaign and election meant a lot to people of color in e.g. France, where they perceive they would have no chance of reaching the upper echelons of power. Obama's success says to them: maybe we can succeed in a place as hide-bound as this too. I can get with this explanation.
― Euler, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:07 (sixteen years ago)
In that case shouldn't the Prize go to the people who voted for him?
― President Keyes, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:09 (sixteen years ago)
Maybe the Nobel Krew thought he should be alive to enjoy it (as this is only get the right wing nuts stroking their guns even more).
― N-N-Nineteen Not Out (King Boy Pato), Friday, 9 October 2009 10:10 (sixteen years ago)
Maybe this thing works the other way round too, and they're trying to send a message to him?
― Obscured by clowns (NickB), Friday, 9 October 2009 10:11 (sixteen years ago)
I will happily take my 1/1000000000 or whatever of the Nobel Prize money.
― Euler, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:14 (sixteen years ago)
nobel peace prize: now easier to get than a diploma from ASU
― iatee, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:15 (sixteen years ago)
So now instead of spam saying "Receive a Batchelor's degree" I'll get things like "Get ur Nobel Prize - no classes or exams to take!"
― a gift from your mind in the form of the perfect beat (snoball), Friday, 9 October 2009 10:16 (sixteen years ago)
It'll just be another reason for the American right to hate them commie europeans. :-/
― StanM, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:17 (sixteen years ago)
no experience necessary! we'll train you!
― iatee, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:17 (sixteen years ago)
Come on guys--he brought Skip Gates and Officer Crowley together for beers.
― President Keyes, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:18 (sixteen years ago)
I'm willing to bet that behind closed doors Obama is actually really pissed about this.
― ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Friday, 9 October 2009 10:21 (sixteen years ago)
I bet he is too.
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:22 (sixteen years ago)
It's hard to see the upside for him (besides the cash, I guess).
― Euler, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:22 (sixteen years ago)
Consolation prize for not winning the olympics.
― StanM, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:23 (sixteen years ago)
(xpost) He can't even keep the money - he has to give it away otherwise people will be like "ooooohhhhh"
― a gift from your mind in the form of the perfect beat (snoball), Friday, 9 October 2009 10:24 (sixteen years ago)
He's one up on Bono?
― Obscured by clowns (NickB), Friday, 9 October 2009 10:24 (sixteen years ago)
I think it might be alright a few years from now when 'nobel laureate' is just a title we can use to make him look more impressive than the GOP candidate and people have stopped thinking about the 'lol wait why did he deserve this' - it's like getting your medical degree in morocco or something, eventually people are gonna forget and just start calling you Dr.
― iatee, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:25 (sixteen years ago)
He'll certainly have to donate the prize cash to a non-partisan aid charity or something, right?
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:26 (sixteen years ago)
cash for clunkers
― iatee, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:26 (sixteen years ago)
(xxpost) Could totally backfire if Afghanistan and Iraq are still in a bit of a mess.
― a gift from your mind in the form of the perfect beat (snoball), Friday, 9 October 2009 10:27 (sixteen years ago)
(I mean, still in a bit of mess by the run up to the next election)
I can't wait to see if he wins for Literature too.
― President Keyes, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:27 (sixteen years ago)
The upside is: Bono didn't win! :-)
― StanM, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:27 (sixteen years ago)
Iraq's going to kick us out soon enough anyway, so that should off his back.
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:27 (sixteen years ago)
should be, rather.
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:28 (sixteen years ago)
This may be some kind of internet watermark story--this news broke over an hour ago and I still don't see it up on Drudge or HuffPo.
― President Keyes, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:29 (sixteen years ago)
Drudge just now put it up.
― President Keyes, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:30 (sixteen years ago)
Fox & Friends all trying to avoid having seizures right now.
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 9 October 2009 10:33 (sixteen years ago)
Announcement from Al Gore: "He gets a Nobel Prize AND the presidency? Oh FFS."
― Lovely and tender, like velvet. (Upt0eleven), Friday, 9 October 2009 10:40 (sixteen years ago)
The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 is to be awarded to President Barack Obama for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. The Committee has attached special importance to Obama's vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.
Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts. The vision of a world free from nuclear arms has powerfully stimulated disarmament and arms control negotiations. Thanks to Obama's initiative, the USA is now playing a more constructive role in meeting the great climatic challenges the world is confronting. Democracy and human rights are to be strengthened.
Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future. His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world's population.
For 108 years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has sought to stimulate precisely that international policy and those attitudes for which Obama is now the world's leading spokesman. The Committee endorses Obama's appeal that "Now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges."
― Ned Trifle (Notinmyname), Friday, 9 October 2009 10:41 (sixteen years ago)
This is gross. Euler OTM.
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 October 2009 10:58 (sixteen years ago)
Guys, The Corner will make for awesome reading this morning.
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 October 2009 11:01 (sixteen years ago)
This is definitely a "LOL Europeans" moment.
― The ever dapper nicolars (Nicole), Friday, 9 October 2009 11:01 (sixteen years ago)
I for one am looking forward to right-wing insinuations that nobody cares because peace is for fags and poor people.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Friday, 9 October 2009 11:04 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1887090,00.html
Maybe Obama will use the prize money to balance the budget when in 6 months 1 krone is worth 10000000000000000 dollars.
― Euler, Friday, 9 October 2009 11:04 (sixteen years ago)
It makes a pleasant change from all of Europe laughing/crying at the stupidity of a US President/Americans in general. Prize goes to the first Corner writer to call the Nobel a Swedish award.
― edward everett horton hears a who (suzy), Friday, 9 October 2009 11:07 (sixteen years ago)
The Corner:
The Company He Keeps [Mona Charen]
Here is a list of Nobel Peace Prize winners since 1980. There are some worthy recipients — Lech Walesa, Shirin Ebadi, Mohammed Yunus. But most Nobel Peace Peace prizes go to conventional leftwing types popular with European elites — Kofi Annan, Jimmy Carter, Al Gore, Mikhail Gorbachev. Before they break out the champagne at the White House, they may want to pause over the fact that Obama now shares this honor with Mohammed el-Baradei, Yasser Arafat, and flagrant liar Rigoberta Menchu Tum.
― StanM, Friday, 9 October 2009 11:10 (sixteen years ago)
(GOP hates el-Baradei? Why?)
― StanM, Friday, 9 October 2009 11:11 (sixteen years ago)
Because he hates nuclear weapons and talks to heads of state.
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 October 2009 11:11 (sixteen years ago)
Oh. I didn't know he was a terrorist.
― StanM, Friday, 9 October 2009 11:12 (sixteen years ago)
omigod.
Prediction [Kathryn Jean Lopez]
Bibi Netanyahu will never be given a Nobel prize.
LOL
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 October 2009 11:12 (sixteen years ago)
― ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Friday, October 9, 2009 11:21 AM (50 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
seriously. this feels like guardian readers writing to voters in swing counties in ohio encouraging them to do what's right, but with evening wear.
― caek, Friday, 9 October 2009 11:13 (sixteen years ago)
Should have figured that "Arafat won it too!" would be the Right's reaction.
― President Keyes, Friday, 9 October 2009 11:13 (sixteen years ago)
Triumph of Hope . . . over Experience? [Mike Potemra]
It looks like the Nobel Prize Committee likes to have fun with the U.S. domestic political consensus. The “most read” stories over on (conservative-leaning but mainstream) RealClearPolitics right now are the following: “Is Obama Becoming a Joke?” “Voters Are Turning Away From Democrats.” “More Popular, But Less Respected.” “Obama Is Suddenly Looking Unsure of Himself.” “Obama’s French Lesson.” And “The Obamas’ Narcissism on Display.”
Those foreigners don't understand America. Don't they know that people who read a right wing news site are clicking on negative stories about Obama?
― President Keyes, Friday, 9 October 2009 11:20 (sixteen years ago)
Well, Kissinger's won too.
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 October 2009 11:23 (sixteen years ago)
Um...
Maybe if we changed the name ... [Andy McCarthy]
After a number of years, the NFL renamed its Super Bowl trophy after its most fitting recipient — it's now called the Vince Lombardi Trophy. I'd like to see the Nobel Foundation follow suit. If today's headlines said, "Barack Obama Wins Yasser Arafat Prize," that would be perfect.
― President Keyes, Friday, 9 October 2009 11:31 (sixteen years ago)
Conveniently forgetting that Arafat shared his prize with Yitzak Rabin and Shimon Peres.
― Mornington Crescent (Ed), Friday, 9 October 2009 12:08 (sixteen years ago)
Mohammed el-Baradei
Huh?
― etaeoe, Friday, 9 October 2009 12:11 (sixteen years ago)
The entire history of people who'd write for the Corner is about convenient collective amnesia.
― edward everett horton hears a who (suzy), Friday, 9 October 2009 12:12 (sixteen years ago)
with the IAEA for contributions for nuclear disarmament I think.
xpost
― Mornington Crescent (Ed), Friday, 9 October 2009 12:12 (sixteen years ago)
Giving Obama a peace price for 'hope' is pretty dumb when he's escalating the Afghan war
― wssp, Friday, 9 October 2009 12:29 (sixteen years ago)
I did not realize the Nobel Peace Prize had an affirmative action quota for, but that is the only thing I can think of for this news.
... from Red State.
To my credit, I predicted this post nearly verbatim when I first heard the news.
― etaeoe, Friday, 9 October 2009 12:30 (sixteen years ago)
the award for best trolling definitely goes to the nobel committee. it's like their main objective is make heads explode across wingnuttia.
― flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Friday, 9 October 2009 12:50 (sixteen years ago)
Aren't they giving this to him a bit early?
loooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool, yes, the body count will be much more in the NPP groove in Jan 2013
― Your Favorite Saturday Night Thing (Dr Morbius), Friday, 9 October 2009 14:15 (sixteen years ago)
For once, Greg Mankiw's snarkiness seems apropos:
http://gregmankiw.blogspot.com/2009/10/first-year-grad-student-wins-nobel.html
― o. nate, Friday, 9 October 2009 14:50 (sixteen years ago)
First of all, I agree that this award was premature, and Obama's probably behind closed doors having a hissy fit. But a few things:
A reason not to be angry at Nobel Prize committee - I still don't support the line of thought around here (and elsewhere) that we should all adjust our actions so as to avoid angering the wingnuts. First it applied to specific debates, then to national politics in general, and now the Nobel Prize committee should consider the needs and worries of the wingnuts before they award a prize. Fuck that, seriously. Obviously the Nobel Prize makes political waves, whomever it's awarded to, but let's not flip the world upside-down so that crazy old racist uncle Charlie can angrily eat his beef jerky in the corner in relative peace and quiet tonight.
and a possible silver lining - this might place some pressure against Obama's plan for Afghanistan. It's bad politically for him, but if you're not a fan of escalation, you can at least view it as a push in a better direction.
But yeah, I agree with everyone here in wishing the Nobel Prize committee wouldn't have blown their collective wad.
― The World's Biggest Christ (Z S), Friday, 9 October 2009 15:05 (sixteen years ago)
They couldn't have held onto this announcement till Monday? I'm in Philadelphia this weekend, and all the wingnuts in my parent's community are going to be chattering about this.
― Mordy, Friday, 9 October 2009 15:09 (sixteen years ago)
i guess you've learned a good lesson here, Mordy: always email Sweden when you have travel plans.
― pariah carey (Mr. Que), Friday, 9 October 2009 15:11 (sixteen years ago)
bastards!
― Mordy, Friday, 9 October 2009 15:12 (sixteen years ago)
who's got the open line to The Corner – is it you, Mordy?
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 October 2009 15:12 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah. Got a message to send?
― Mordy, Friday, 9 October 2009 15:13 (sixteen years ago)
"Peace unto this house."
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 9 October 2009 15:13 (sixteen years ago)
Norway, xpost
― Mornington Crescent (Ed), Friday, 9 October 2009 15:14 (sixteen years ago)
Not really a bigger deal than Helen Hunt winning an Oscar.
― Your Favorite Saturday Night Thing (Dr Morbius), Friday, 9 October 2009 15:14 (sixteen years ago)
do we think Goldberg is being honest here?
Exactly! [Jonah Goldberg]
A reader forwarded me this tweet from an Obama supporter:
I loved this tweet from an Obama supporter (@LeeBillings):
Yknow, just to reiterate something I've heard elsewhere... It's not Obama's fault that he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize... Jeez people.
― pariah carey (Mr. Que), Friday, 9 October 2009 15:16 (sixteen years ago)
lol great thread for this
he's speaking like right now isn't he? is anyone watching tv?
― goole, Friday, 9 October 2009 15:23 (sixteen years ago)
and now the Nobel Prize committee should consider the needs and worries of the wingnuts before they award a prize. Fuck that, seriously.
erm as a Norwegian (and I've said a "wtf" at this awardination alredy) -- NO -- plz understand USA that no other country really knows or cares about your wingnuts!
(ok ok some care about wingnuts bcz lol etc, but.)
― anatol_merklich, Saturday, 10 October 2009 00:36 (sixteen years ago)
yeah why would any foreigner need to care about american politics?? lol
― iatee, Saturday, 10 October 2009 00:38 (sixteen years ago)
yeah why would any foreigner care about a Norwegian award?? lol
― anatol_merklich, Saturday, 10 October 2009 00:47 (sixteen years ago)
"And the winner for Noblest Fjord goes to..."
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 10 October 2009 00:49 (sixteen years ago)
or a swedish award given by a norwegian
― iatee, Saturday, 10 October 2009 00:51 (sixteen years ago)
Not any Norwegian, this Norwegian (far left):
http://www.dagbladet.no/nyheter/2000/07/09/DI_5sl26kchSvaboSak2.JPG
― anatol_merklich, Saturday, 10 October 2009 00:53 (sixteen years ago)
What I meant abt "wingnut" post was just the obvious, ie Glenn Beck or whoever is in the world's eye about as important as Li Guwhatwho, the insurgency leader in wartorn Gelbankistan, intent on bringing the justice of Confucianism to the suffering people of the Leninist leaders of the Counter-Counter-Revolution.
It's still many, many lols though, so don't stop reporting from your particular country, ie Ireland. Enjoying your updates, Bono.
― anatol_merklich, Saturday, 10 October 2009 00:58 (sixteen years ago)
Not any Norwegian, this Norwegian (far left)
Looks like he knows a thing or two about life. I do not distrust that man.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Saturday, 10 October 2009 02:16 (sixteen years ago)
do we think Goldberg is being honest here?Exactly! [Jonah Goldberg]A reader forwarded me this tweet from an Obama supporter:I loved this tweet from an Obama supporter (@LeeBillings):Yknow, just to reiterate something I've heard elsewhere... It's not Obama's fault that he was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize... Jeez people.― pariah carey (Mr. Que), Saturday, October 10, 2009 4:16 AM (10 hours ago) Bookmark
― pariah carey (Mr. Que), Saturday, October 10, 2009 4:16 AM (10 hours ago) Bookmark
I think this is like, "nope it sure isn't his fault ;-) ;-)". "Obama supporter in foot-in-mouth lolz"
― Big King Buggle Sprayer (╓abies), Saturday, 10 October 2009 02:19 (sixteen years ago)
lol @ all of this
― fleetwood (max), Saturday, 10 October 2009 02:26 (sixteen years ago)
that half inning wasnt a fatigue-induced hallucination was it
haha wrong thread
Yeah...and thank god for that!
If you read my original post, I was offering a counterpoint to people who try to argue that the nobel prize shouldn't have been given to Obama because of what the wingnuts would think.
― The World's Biggest Christ (Z S), Saturday, 10 October 2009 02:27 (sixteen years ago)
no other country really knows or cares about your wingnuts!
From what I understand most of the world's 'right wing' is more left wing than the US 'left wing'. They see US wingnuts as completely and utterly batshit insane - and hardly worth taking seriously - right?
― Adam Bruneau, Saturday, 10 October 2009 02:34 (sixteen years ago)
xpost to self
...which is like my persistent quasi-strawman that I always try to beat the shit out of. It just annoys me when I see the argument crop up occasionally.
― The World's Biggest Christ (Z S), Saturday, 10 October 2009 02:36 (sixteen years ago)
Gandhi was nominated for the Nobel Prize 5x and never won, Richard Burton to Bam's Sally Field.
― Your Favorite Saturday Night Thing (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 10 October 2009 03:13 (sixteen years ago)
From what I gather, the Peace Prize has never been about foresight, and in fact nobody is quite sure why Alfred Nobel created it in the first place. It's been used as a political ratchet wrench more often than not. Which only makes it funnier that many people, commenting on Obama's win, are taking the tone of, "Doesn't the Nobel Prize mean anything anymore?! This is all just politics!" Uh... yeah. It is.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Saturday, 10 October 2009 03:41 (sixteen years ago)
this is embarassing and awkward for everyone involved imo
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 10 October 2009 03:46 (sixteen years ago)
More embarrassing than giving it to Kissinger? I think not.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Saturday, 10 October 2009 03:47 (sixteen years ago)
Nobel Prize Committee may have pulled a serious boner here
― The World's Biggest Christ (Z S), Saturday, 10 October 2009 03:49 (sixteen years ago)
A bad vision.
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 10 October 2009 03:50 (sixteen years ago)
Let's see what Afghanistan looks like in a few months.
Time will tell. It always does.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Saturday, 10 October 2009 03:50 (sixteen years ago)
fuckin snitch
― My Way or the KSHighway (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 10 October 2009 03:51 (sixteen years ago)
Which only makes it funnier that many people, commenting on Obama's win, are taking the tone of, "Doesn't the Nobel Prize mean anything anymore?! This is all just politics!" Uh... yeah. It is.
Next thing we know the Grammys are going to mean nothing.
― Cunga, Saturday, 10 October 2009 04:14 (sixteen years ago)
I was offering a counterpoint to people who try to argue that the nobel prize shouldn't have been given to Obama because of what the wingnuts would think.― The World's Biggest Christ (Z S), Saturday, October 10, 2009 3:27 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark
― The World's Biggest Christ (Z S), Saturday, October 10, 2009 3:27 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark
I'll otm alla what Z S is layin down. It's an especially silly argument since it doesn't really matter what Obama does when it comes to the wingnuts. Crazies gonna craze.
― Big King Buggle Sprayer (╓abies), Saturday, 10 October 2009 04:44 (sixteen years ago)
― o. nate, Friday, October 9, 2009 10:50 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
oh man I didn't realize this was the same guy who wrote my intro to microecon textbook
― dyao, Saturday, 10 October 2009 05:14 (sixteen years ago)
would rather a first year grad student win it than greg mankiw
― iatee, Saturday, 10 October 2009 05:19 (sixteen years ago)
http://imgur.com/eIdek.jpg
― kate78, Saturday, 10 October 2009 05:19 (sixteen years ago)
tbh I'm waiting for the Kanye acceptance speech & OMG Obama wins Peace Prize memes to converge
― dyao, Saturday, 10 October 2009 05:23 (sixteen years ago)
From what I understand most of the world's 'right wing' is more left wing than the US 'left wing'.
France's right wing is some crazy shit though.
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 October 2009 05:26 (sixteen years ago)
But let's be fair. Who DOESN'T hate Arabs nowadays?
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Saturday, 10 October 2009 06:08 (sixteen years ago)
(I realize now that I hit 'submit' that my comment may not carry the irony I intended. So just to be clear, that was a joke.)
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Saturday, 10 October 2009 06:10 (sixteen years ago)
Someone already made this joke at a friend of mine's Facebook profile:
Imma let you finish Obama but Martti Ahtisaari is one of the best Nobelists of all time! One of the best Nobelists of all time!
― Tuomas, Saturday, 10 October 2009 08:28 (sixteen years ago)
I think about 17,000,000 people made that joke before noon, actually.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Saturday, 10 October 2009 08:38 (sixteen years ago)
I think so, yeah. At the same time I seriously wonder whether they're admiring them in secret or something.
― anatol_merklich, Saturday, 10 October 2009 13:28 (sixteen years ago)
when you consider that we let an ayn rand devotee run the federal reserve for almost 20 years, the world kind of has to take our right-wing lunatics seriously.
― flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Saturday, 10 October 2009 13:35 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1219364/QUENTIN-LETTS-Why-politicians--including-sadly-Tories-week--fawn-Bono-smug-hypocritical-whining-tax-dodging-Irish-mountebank.html
― conrad, Saturday, 10 October 2009 13:45 (sixteen years ago)
Obv I'd happily watch Letts being eaten alive by soldier ants but kudos on getting "mountebank" in there.
― It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a Hongro. (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:04 (sixteen years ago)
I liked the Taliban's reaction: "He should have won the Nobel prize for escalating violence." It sounds fantastically childish, like, "Yeah, he should have won the Nobel prize for SUCKING ASS!"
― Dorian (Dorianlynskey), Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:05 (sixteen years ago)
Letts: "Had Bono not taken up his famine and African poverty agenda, would he have sold so many records and remained such a big name for so long? Quite possibly not. He might well have disappeared into non-entitydom."
Or quite possibly yes. I'll never understand this sales-boost logic: "I just saw a picture of Bono shaking hands with Kofi Annan and now I just have to buy a copy of the new U2 album!" Probably outweighed by: "I just saw a picture of Bono shaking hands with George Bush and now I'm going to stop buying U2 albums."
― Dorian (Dorianlynskey), Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:12 (sixteen years ago)
A reason not to be angry at Nobel Prize committee - I still don't support the line of thought around here (and elsewhere) that we should all adjust our actions so as to avoid angering the wingnuts. First it applied to specific debates, then to national politics in general, and now the Nobel Prize committee should consider the needs and worries of the wingnuts before they award a prize. Fuck that ... But yeah, I agree with everyone here in wishing the Nobel Prize committee wouldn't have blown their collective wad.
― The World's Biggest Christ (Z S), Friday, 9 October 2009 15:05 (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Er, yeah: the thing is, outside of the sciences (maybe IN the sciences, I don't know) the Nobel is notorious for being about the expediency of that moment and what message it can send (c.f. Pinter's terrible latter-days work prompting a Nobel Lit., when he was being very vocally anti-Iraq at the time). And this reads (to me, at least) as a fairly explicit lol-at-you-guys move aimed at the American right wing. It's not a helpful or well-timed intervention, I guess. Or er in other words kenan otm:
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Saturday, 10 October 2009 03:41 (10 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― thomp, Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:13 (sixteen years ago)
The original Live Aid gig did boost a bunch of careers tho I thought, saleswise.
― It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a Hongro. (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:13 (sixteen years ago)
Everyone except Boomtown Rats I think.
― knick knack auf zack (Ned Trifle II), Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:19 (sixteen years ago)
I heard everybody except Adam Ant.
Sales going from 0 to 2 = a boost.
― It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a Hongro. (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:21 (sixteen years ago)
Oh yeah, definitely. Likewise the 1988 Mandela show, which seems to have been a nightmare of competing egos and shallow opportunists despite presence of bona fide activists like Jerry Dammers. But that's one easy three-song set in front of a global TV audience. I think Bono's in a different category, seeing that he spends an enormous amount of his free time working on campaigns (the efficacy of which are, of course, an entirely different issue). In terms of time spent, and flak attracted, there must be easier ways of getting publicity. This trite publicity = sales equation ignores why most people buy pop records, ie they like the music.
― Dorian (Dorianlynskey), Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:23 (sixteen years ago)
The relative commercial failure of No Line on the Horizon, at a time when Bono's profile as an activist is as high as it's ever been, proves my point.
― Dorian (Dorianlynskey), Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:24 (sixteen years ago)
Oh Lett's, with his up-to-date and groovy pop references.
enough to make a reasonable man come over all Pete Townsendish
― knick knack auf zack (Ned Trifle II), Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:25 (sixteen years ago)
seeing that he spends an enormous amount of his free time working on campaigns
"You know that world poverty? It's a terrible thing, let me show you some my graphs"http://slashgossip.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/bono_bikini_chicks.gif
― knick knack auf zack (Ned Trifle II), Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:30 (sixteen years ago)
it occurs to me that basically what the nobel committee are doing is trolling
― thomp, Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:37 (sixteen years ago)
Someone already said that upthread.
― Tuomas, Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:39 (sixteen years ago)
Nothing worse than people repeating messages on a thread.
― It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a Hongro. (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:39 (sixteen years ago)
― Tuomas, Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:44 (sixteen years ago)
So did anyone think the Nobel committee was trolling?
― Roman Polanski now sleeps in prison. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:46 (sixteen years ago)
haah sorry :(
― thomp, Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:46 (sixteen years ago)
http://slashgossip.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/bono_bikini_chicks.gif http://photos-c.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs204.snc1/7133_642880151230_36910239_41162122_650888_n.jpg
― StanM, Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:57 (sixteen years ago)
TOO SOON
― It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a Hongro. (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 10 October 2009 14:59 (sixteen years ago)
sorry :-)
― StanM, Saturday, 10 October 2009 15:01 (sixteen years ago)
:-D
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Saturday, 10 October 2009 15:12 (sixteen years ago)
what did lj get 204'd for?
― Pedro Paramore (jim), Saturday, 10 October 2009 16:31 (sixteen years ago)
Obama vs. Bono: FITE!
― Aimless, Saturday, 10 October 2009 16:57 (sixteen years ago)
would rather have bono vs. quentin letts: fite but you're american so OK
― conrad, Saturday, 10 October 2009 17:03 (sixteen years ago)
but you're american so OK
board descrip for Britisher sub-board
― ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Saturday, 10 October 2009 19:23 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.slowpokecomics.com/strips/terminatrix.gif
― Tuomas, Sunday, 18 October 2009 09:01 (sixteen years ago)