"young go-getters"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
do you despise them as much as i do?

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:24 (twenty-two years ago)

try envy.

But yes.

g.cannon (gcannon), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:25 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't really mean people with, y'know, drive and ambition (cuz i do envy that), i mean more of a type: like the guy who butted in front of me while i was paying for my meal in the diner/tobacco shop because he just had to get this hand-rolling "natural" cigs, slicked back hair, bad suit and shoes, etc.

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:27 (twenty-two years ago)

actually the cigs guy is probably a bad example, cuz a real y.g.g. wouldn't smoke, even au natural

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:29 (twenty-two years ago)

hand-rolling "natural" cigs, slicked back hair, bad suit and shoes, etc.

So “young go-getters” = “Radio Shack Manager”?

No One (SiggyBaby), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Radio Shack managers are like minor deities to me.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:31 (twenty-two years ago)

i suspect a real young go getter would look down on a radio shack manager.

also, they know which batteries my watch takes = they are demi-gods

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Hmmm... When I think of young go-getters I think of these two ladies at my office that are probably not that much younger than me (one might even be older). One of them was just freaking out now because she had tasted a Schmirnoff not knowing it had alcohol in it and she'd never had any liquor before in her life!

Earlier today I had a meeting with my boss in which he loaded a bajillion new multi-faceted projects on my back. When I was complaining to the ladies, they said, "Oh! You're so lucky! I wish I were given that much responsibility!"

Please! Have some! It's on the house!

Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Radio Shack is one of the few stores where I actively seek the counsel of it's employees.

lawrence kansas (lawrence kansas), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry. I got a little excited there and posted way too many exclamation points.

Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:36 (twenty-two years ago)

sarah has nailed it

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:37 (twenty-two years ago)

although the y.g.g. is useful if you are in a position of power over them

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:38 (twenty-two years ago)

i have a young go getter working close to me. she's nice. Every so often she'll say things like "I've got higher qualifications than anyone here" (usually after someones treated her like shit). Because she is soooo keen she is really abused by management in terms of expectations. They get her to do this, that, everything. I sit back and stretch, yawn, post on ILE. I'm an old go-nowhere.

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:40 (twenty-two years ago)

jess, imagine working in a bank full of Brooks-Brothers-clad MBA types. These fuckers think I have long hair!

hstencil, Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:45 (twenty-two years ago)

the very notion of having another office job after 12 mos. of unemployment makes me go vaguely catatonic

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:46 (twenty-two years ago)

One of them was just freaking out now because she had tasted a Schmirnoff not knowing it had alcohol in it and she'd never had any liquor before in her life!

What do you mean 'a Schmirnoff'? The vodka? What did she think it was, fancy water?

(too many questions. sorry. not sorry or i'd go back and change it.)

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:53 (twenty-two years ago)

maybe one of those "schmirnoff ice" malt drinks

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:55 (twenty-two years ago)

well, it'll get you ready for the specific catatonia...

I can't stand answer-every-question types, pleasers, mediocrities. There was a big interview in the Univ of M*nn's newsletter (where I work) with some kid who's a Rhodes scholar (pictured with rimless glasses and Oxford scarf). They give him the bullshittest q: "what lessons did you learn from your family?" and he ticked through every member with two "lessons" each! (how to love, be true to himself, etc) a) grr what I could do if I studied IR at Oxford b) this is the game you have to play and WIN to get there? Gross!

g.cannon (gcannon), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:56 (twenty-two years ago)

What do you mean 'a Schmirnoff'? The vodka? What did she think it was, fancy water?

maybe one of those "schmirnoff ice" malt drinks
Yes, that's what it was.
She's... I don't know... naive??

Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 21:58 (twenty-two years ago)

"what did you learn from your family" could be a fun thread here, though....

Maria (Maria), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 22:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Malty vodka? Americans are moronic.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 22:16 (twenty-two years ago)

judge us not by our non-beer, sir.

g.cannon (gcannon), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 22:18 (twenty-two years ago)

But your beer is like 2% vol or something!

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 22:20 (twenty-two years ago)

I was really hoping "young go-getters" was going to be a euphemism for "horny young things covered in butterscotch and twenty-dollar bills".

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 22:30 (twenty-two years ago)

You hate them for their vulgar ambition, then you hate them more when they're stinking rich. Duddest!

Aaron A., Wednesday, 19 February 2003 22:38 (twenty-two years ago)

There is something I find really offensive about this discussion (and for once it's not something Dan said!), but I can't put my finger on it. I don't think I understand the definition of young go getter being used here.

Oh sorry, I have a job, I take shit so I can give shit one day, let me go slit my wrists?

The non-alcoholic girls described just sound like morons, not ambitious go-getters. They sound like the dumb temp we had at work. She was a sweet girl, and threw a wobbly when they asked her to be receptionist, as she was "an executive assistant". Her ability to file or answer multiple phones said otherwise. Those girls sound like her. They aren't ambitious or anything, they're just dummies who don't know they're dumb.

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 23:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Personally, my YGG ire is reserved for the many ppl I knew from HS who ended up in finance and are now making megabucks at Merril Lynch or Goldman Sachs, working insane hours and under enormous stress doing work that is largely corrupt in its nature. But these are "smart" ppl to be sure.

Aaron A., Wednesday, 19 February 2003 23:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Ambitious go-getters are annoying when they get things that I want. And what's even more annoying is that they get them because they worked harder or better than I did, so they deserve them. Sour grapes! (Other people might also say this about me.)

Maria (Maria), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 23:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I hate the student union kind of ambitious go getter, their only passion is for kudos.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 23:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Mmm, Kudos...

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 23:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Damn you Perry!

RickyT (RickyT), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 23:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Damn you seconded

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 23:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I think the person I met a few weeks ago who described her job doing PR for Philip Morris as "really fascinating" qualifies. She also literally didn't understand when I told her about how there are some places for which I write for free or for very little: "if you can get $2 a word, why wouldn't you demand that from every account you've got?"

Douglas (Douglas), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 23:41 (twenty-two years ago)

(heh heh heh http://www.jozev.com/images/Webimages/thumbs/050-3393_t.jpg)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 23:43 (twenty-two years ago)

You're all 'young go-getters' to me

Andrew L (Andrew L), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 23:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I think I like Kang better than Kudos

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 23:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Doing PR for a big tobacco company would be fascinating, in its own way.

Aaron A., Wednesday, 19 February 2003 23:54 (twenty-two years ago)

The PR guy at my firm used to be a PR guy at Phillip Morris too.

Sean (Sean), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 23:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Ha ha Ally thinks it might refer to her.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 23:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Maybe it does.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 23:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Most American beer is about 3.5% alcohol volume right? (non malt liquers)

That Girl (thatgirl), Wednesday, 19 February 2003 23:59 (twenty-two years ago)

No, it averages about 5-6%.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 20 February 2003 00:02 (twenty-two years ago)

that's higher than here.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 20 February 2003 00:02 (twenty-two years ago)

yes and all their drugs are better too

Andrew L (Andrew L), Thursday, 20 February 2003 00:08 (twenty-two years ago)

What is it with all this malt?

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 20 February 2003 00:23 (twenty-two years ago)

hate them, and i am to blame. i work in finance. which is a total trip,suits everywhere ive been working it two years, rode the rabid temping beast previous to this nightmare and before that everything else. and it is all a dag nasty rotted flesh parade. these young go getters are more of a "i walk around with a fuck you attitude and i think its cute, attractive,hip..." thing is, its part of the game.office politics. climb the corporate ladder.. but hey it was like this at the gas station and everywhere else.cuthroats, so. the clincher is ridin home on a crowded subway packed full of these powertripping crackheads.fucking spiders.

kephm, Thursday, 20 February 2003 00:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, it's much better not to try and get ahead, or even to do well at your job. Don't dress well, while you're at it.

Sean (Sean), Thursday, 20 February 2003 00:42 (twenty-two years ago)

C'mon, Sean. There is a big difference between trying to get ahead, and undercutting other people to get ahead - plenty of which I see in my investment bank job. So much so that our senior executives talk about "teamwork" in almost every piece of corporate communication.

And I dress well, I just don't wanna cut my hair. What's the big deal? It's 2003.

hstencil, Thursday, 20 February 2003 00:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Why do people want to get ahead, again?

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 20 February 2003 00:49 (twenty-two years ago)

To make more money so you can buy more records.

Sean (Sean), Thursday, 20 February 2003 00:57 (twenty-two years ago)

*zing!*

hstencil, Thursday, 20 February 2003 01:02 (twenty-two years ago)

You're going to give me money to buy records?

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 20 February 2003 01:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Envy? Shit yeah. Every time I walk down Chapel Street Prahran I am an envious as hell.

I envy them their money. I envy them their fancy suits and fancy technological toys. I envy them their air of 'what the hell you think you're doing in my street?'

I envy them their completely fucked-up marriages and personal lives. I envy them their shot-to-buggery health. I envy them their paranoia. I envy them their stultifying, constant dedication to 'image management'. I envy them their insane working hours and their completely bogus Company-issue self-esteem which depends for renewal on doing whatever the fuck the boss tells them, whenever, wherever the boss so chooses and the rest of your life, such as they may have carelessly allowed to remain, can go and get stuffed. I especially envy them the constant stream of earth-shakingly trivial biggest-fish-in-the-stagnant-pond office politics they immerse themselves in and, in the ultimate act of obsequiousness, pretend to give a shit about. When they hit 50, I'll sure as hell envy a massively disproportionate number of them their first heart attack.

For an only slightly exaggerated example of Homo Corporatus gone absolutely mutant-feral, check out Grisham's The Firm (I mean read it, sod that God-awful film).

The line at the end of 'No-one is Innocent' resounds in a million ears: 'Ever get the feeling you've been cheated?'

Fred Nerk, Thursday, 20 February 2003 01:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I prefer 'had'.

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 20 February 2003 01:35 (twenty-two years ago)

God, what is this, high school?! Some of you people need to grow up. It's a lifestyle choice, big deal. Painting w/ a broad brush, i.e. all people who wear suits and work for corporations are evil, self-centered, gentrifiers is about as wrong-headed and counter-productive as you can get.

So some people get off on getting a promotion. Big deal, good for them. Other people get off on hunting down rare records, playing in bands, going to clubs, etc. Good for them too. Again, it's a lifestyle choice. They may get a heart attack at age 50, but they'll get it in a nice-ass crib instead of a shithole apartment, and I guess that's just important to some people.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 February 2003 01:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Saying it's just a matter of lifestyle choice is a bit disengenuous, though I see what you're trying to say. As it is, I don't see any contradiction between getting off on a promotion and getting off on music, say -- the two can combine rather easily.

Personally, I just distrust any place where there are regulations and/or expectations of what I'm supposed to dress like or look like (this is one of many reasons I could never join the military). Did you want someone to do the job or did you want the tailor and stylist? In which case, hire them, please.

This obviously doesn't preclude dressing formally for a job and so forth. The point is, it shouldn't have to be a requirement -- turning up to work clean and presentable does not automatically mean you have to wear a business suit.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 01:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah good for them, I respect baldfaced liars who think they're better than me because they've learned to "play the game"

The massive dripping turd hanging off the end of their proboscis fm their last face session with the branch supe/sales chief/VP of paper-waste makes me respect them even more. Hey, that's hard work, people

Just bcz you can describe it as a lifestyle choice doesn't mean it's a valid way for you to waste my time/tax dollars/investment capital with yr Herman Miller Aeron chair on the company budget and yr first class plane tix back and forth across the country attending meetings in which you accomplish nothing that wd be beyond the avg capacity of a Cole Haan mannequin

Young or old doesn't matter to me. A soulless fuck without a single original idea in his/her head is the same no matter when you meet them - trbl is they like to hang around with each other all the time bcz us 'longhairs' make them uncomfortable w/our ability to make them look stupid

There's a difference between working hard, working just enuf to get ahead, and the 'go-getters' who can't do their job but make up for it by arranging the right 'face time' - at least real slackers are honest

Millar (Millar), Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:02 (twenty-two years ago)

disengenuous

But why, Ned? I meant everything I said.

These people just decide at some point that they want make a go for that kind of work environment, wealth, etc. I'm not saying one or the other lifestyle is better. I would bet those that take the corporate path aren't sitting around burning negative energy about how much cooler and smarter the hipsters appear.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, they don't talk abt it to other people, Diamond. How silly to admit any inadequacy to a peer. But if you happen to be the lucky subordinate who is smarter than the 'go-getter' placed in a supe pos, I suggest a small mirror at yr workstation, so you can see the knife.

Millar (Millar), Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Millar speaks wisdom, he does.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Except Millar works in the military. Weapons aren't generally around so much in yr average office, are they?

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:28 (twenty-two years ago)

yow. no rat race for me, thanks!

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:29 (twenty-two years ago)

anything can be an effective weapon in the workplace wars

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:29 (twenty-two years ago)

actually my office is mostly civilian + like 3 AF dudes incl. me
for some reason we are not allowed to launch rockets and bombs from our desks

Millar (Millar), Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:30 (twenty-two years ago)

What can be used to cause the most mass destruction in an office stationery cupboard?

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:31 (twenty-two years ago)

staplers

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:31 (twenty-two years ago)

oh oh and white out

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:32 (twenty-two years ago)

let's not forget the ballpoint pea-shooter

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Office supplies are vicious weapons. We keep ours near the medical supplies.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:34 (twenty-two years ago)

"Saddam has still not accounted for 1000 ballpoint pea-shooters and 2000 gallons of Tippex"

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Sure Mr D...he might get his heart attack in his very own swank executive apartment. But considering the amount of time he'd get to spend in his V.O.S.E.A. while he's out slowly killing himself for his employer, the odds would be fairly heavily against it.

A play of Brecht's (can't remember which one) has a mad army sergeant lecturing one of his minions along the lines of,

'When a good soldier hears his superior officer addressing him, he gets a hard on, and when he actually gets his orders, he comes...when a soldier falls on the battlefield he should imagine his commanding officer smiling approvingly at him. It is his confirmation that he has been a good and faithful servant.'

A lot of cornflakes-packet-MBA managers nowadays seem to have that attitude.

Fred Nerk, Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:37 (twenty-two years ago)

The presumption I usually make with go-getters is that they are struggling desperately for simple security above anything else. Financial, obviously; but even moreso, a career-centered self worth and a career-centered outward respectability. With the right degree/cv there is no real risk of abject failure in life as society defines it.

But if I'm not any more accurate in my assessment of YGGs than they are about slackers/hipsters in some conversations I'v heard, I should shut up.

Aaron A., Thursday, 20 February 2003 02:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, everyone who works in an office is a miserable sociopath. Just like everyone in Williamsburg is an obnoxious pretend art student. Right?

Call your unemployment office, maybe they will cry you a river.

In our office, we shoot each other with rubber bands. They make an excellent weapon.

Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 20 February 2003 03:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I just started a new job. So far I am acting like a y.g.g. but it's only a matter of time before I discover the loopholes my position allows me. Then it will be non-stop internet trolling and 2-hour lunches. I just need some time to become invisible first.

Mandee, Thursday, 20 February 2003 03:34 (twenty-two years ago)

I can deeply relate to Mandee's mentality. Make friends, then let your laziness ooze out of you. Thankfully my job allows me so much websurfin' time I actually write reviews and whatnot AT work always. It totally spoils me and I'm worried some day I'll have a job that won't let me further my hobbies at the same time.

Feel free to hate me for my luck. hee hee!

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 20 February 2003 03:38 (twenty-two years ago)

oh jesus Ally.
It's not 'everybody who works in an office' or 'everybody who gets promoted evah' for fuck's sake. It's the occasional shitlunged ass ferrets who spoil things for everyone by getting ahead without doing anything worthwhile (unless being a two-faced sycophantic backstabbing cubicle whore as being worthwhile). These are the same people who continue their merciless charades for decades and finally end up in charge of their own little fiefdoms, in turn encouraging more of the same behavior, creating a vicious cycle which ends in entire departments being staffed with no talent whatsoever except in entry-level positions (full of young ppl who soon bless the company with a shocking turnover rate once they realize what kind of creatures they work for).

Millar (Millar), Thursday, 20 February 2003 03:44 (twenty-two years ago)

No Ally, not everybody. Just the ones who base their feelings of moral superiority on the fact. If you want to work 80 hours a week, go for it. Just get on with it and don't expect the rest of the world to kiss your butt for it or look to you as an example.

Fred Nerk, Thursday, 20 February 2003 03:56 (twenty-two years ago)

What about older go-getters? At my previous job there was a woman about 55 who was constantly taking on extra projects and staying late and only taking an hour lunch and arriving on time every day--and one day she confessed that she was terrified of losing a job at her age (reasoning that at 55 the chances of getting hired are much slimmer, which isn't necessarily true at all). Is this better, or worse?

Mandee, Thursday, 20 February 2003 04:06 (twenty-two years ago)

better. at least she was honest about her motivations, which are pretty sound really

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 20 February 2003 04:07 (twenty-two years ago)

i knew this one would start fights

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 20 February 2003 04:14 (twenty-two years ago)

(i also knew it would be people who felt like they were called out int he subject header)

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 20 February 2003 04:14 (twenty-two years ago)

It's not just jealousy and/or outgrouping. There is something genuinely soulless and disturbing about yuppies (isn't that who you're talking about? I feel like I'm missing something 'cause that word hasn't been brought up and I'm still mortified over my gaffe on the transformers thread). I don't know, maybe it is just outgrouping, but I could swear that if I put on my special sunglasses they would look a hell of a lot different.

Dan I., Thursday, 20 February 2003 04:15 (twenty-two years ago)

whoops < /troublemaker>

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 20 February 2003 04:15 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm a credentialed slacker. and i work in a profession full of "young go-getters." i only envy them 'cause i want a big-firm salary (while putting in small-firm/public-sector hours) -- fat chance.

i live to see certain Columbia/Harvard/Chicago/Penn/NYU law grads slumped over their desks after their hearts exploded in their chests 'cause they didn't bill the 3,000 hours necessary to get a $50K bonus or when they find out that they aren't one of the 5% of associates who get to make partner.

Tad (llamasfur), Thursday, 20 February 2003 04:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Footnote to my previous thread: also remember, you could be spending your 80 hours a week in your office working in a field about which most of us may have negative feelings or knowledge (such as the vacuous world of advertising) or none at all (such as the completely foreign world of finance). So if that applies, your dedication to your job is likely to make you less interesting rather than more.

Which is something else your MBA probably didn't tell you.

Fred Nerk, Thursday, 20 February 2003 04:41 (twenty-two years ago)

i live to be hated!

GG Allin, Esq. (llamasfur), Thursday, 20 February 2003 04:44 (twenty-two years ago)

So if that applies, your dedication to your job is likely to make you less interesting rather than more.

But why? Aren't you curious about things you, as you say "have negative knowledge"? This is what I don't get. Why not try to befriend someone who is familiar with things that you aren't? I dunno, I guess I just like having a wide circle of acquaintances. I like learning from the people I meet. People aren't all evil, even if they may have different interests from your own.

I mean, if you want to criticize capitalism, corporate greed, the fucked-up way this country is run, etc. wouldn't you feel more comfortable doing so from a position of knowledge?

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 February 2003 04:54 (twenty-two years ago)

I work in market research, at the sharp end where you actually talk to actual people. Our boss regularly gets offside with other tenants of our building (fly-by-nights whose comings and goings regularly cause traffic jams in the lifts) because she doesn't impose a dress code on reps dropping work off in the office. As we've been there 30 years and not many of them lst 12 months, I figure I know which way the owner would jump on that issue.

Of the examples I mentioned, the few people in advertising I know have done nothing to break down the stereotype that their world is a hotbed of ego, tantrum and paranoia completely out of whack with the fact that the issues over which they squabble are trivial and vacuous to the outside world. Like dope smokers, they are noisy, pretentious, self-satisfied and utterly uninteresting. I avoid them as far as is possible.

Finance? That's a bit different. I've watched (and enjoyed) Trading Places half a dozen times and still have no handle on the plot of the last half hour. I'm sure it's a fascinating field, and I'm not often called an idiot, but it's all a black hole to me. I just can't understand it. So if I meet somebody who works in that area, we have to find something else to talk about. That could be difficult if you're up to your neck in it for 80 hours...only 88 more remain.

If you work at a job that I find morally objectionable and/or dull as ditchwater and/or incomprehensible, or all of the above (such as advertising) for only 40 hours a week, it leaves much more time for other things we may have in common.

Excessive use of any finite resource (such as time) always will limit your options.

Fred Nerk, Thursday, 20 February 2003 05:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Trading Places is great! One of my all time favorites. As long as you wait three or four years between viewings, it is still a very funny film. I love Inga from Sweden. Anyway, there is something right there. say you find yourself in the company of some finance dude; just ask him, "what in the heck happens at the end of trading places"?

I understand what you're saying about advertising; I'd say it probably is the weakest field in terms of generating interesting people. I mean what, these people dig up an ELO song and they're clever? I'd much rather talk to a lawyer. That said, if I found myself pushed up against an ad person at a bar I'd still probably try to hear what the industry was up to. in other words I'm not even expecting these people to have outside interests at the passion level I do; it would be enough for me to learn a bit about their business.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 February 2003 05:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I understand what you're saying about advertising; I'd say it probably is the weakest field in terms of generating interesting people. I mean what, these people dig up an ELO song and they're clever? I'd much rather talk to a lawyer.

cries

(you've just hurt felicity's and colin's feelings too!)

Tad (llamasfur), Thursday, 20 February 2003 05:51 (twenty-two years ago)

*blush*

Well, of course I didn't mean you all! You guys are the greatest!

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 February 2003 05:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Fred: you have me wondering where you work now, what with your rant on Chapel Street *grin*. Its interesting what you said about the fly-by-nighters getting snooty because you're not all wearing suits - we had the same issue as our co. had floorspace in a major aust. health fund's building, and the people who worked for said health fund were often overheard making very bitchy comments about us being "goths" "freaks" and other such nonsense. So what if a few of us had blue hair, tattoos, peircings, no shoes, shaved heads, mohawks, leather everything, motorbikes....

Trayce (trayce), Thursday, 20 February 2003 07:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Hmmmmmmmm, this thread has seemingly merged with the "why are nerds unpopular thread" in a mystic crystal revelation sort of way. Nerds are unpopular because they are nerds.

Why do you hate YGG, defined variously as people who are hateable. Because they're despicable, of course.

Don't be a playah hatah! Well, all right, go ahead and hate them--they're awful! Especially the ones who have just finished a backbreaking mindlessly dull project and have black circles under their eyes, and then can only describe the project as "fun, man. Really fun." Fun? Fun is finding an ELO record, not working until 2:00 a.m.

Whoops, I've fallen into your web of wicked loving lies....

Skottie, Thursday, 20 February 2003 07:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I feel very sorry for these types. (By which I mean more credentials than brains, work ethic based partially on desperation, position as definition.) They always hurt themselves because they don't know when to quit -- the sad part is that it's only the realy dumb ones who are truly successful, because they don't have much of a soul to have a long dark night of.

The problem with playing the game is that it's very hard to stop.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Thursday, 20 February 2003 10:06 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't know. I mean, I hate them too and it's not really envy (I am not one of them because I am lazy - OTOH if I wasn't lazy I wouldn't be using my energies to be one).

But on the other hand - I am in a reasonably-paid job and have ever-more-thinly disguised contempt for what I do and post to ILE all day; and the guy next to me is in a similar job and seems really enthusiastic about it and actually believes what we do has meaning and maybe even benefit for someone. I would guess that he feels happier and less frustrated than I about his work.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 20 February 2003 10:11 (twenty-two years ago)

**the few people in advertising I know have done nothing to break down the stereotype that their world is a hotbed of ego, tantrum and paranoia completely out of whack with the fact that the issues over which they squabble are trivial and vacuous to the outside world. Like dope smokers, they are noisy, pretentious, self-satisfied and utterly uninteresting**

Fred - this is magnificent. You must know some people who work with me!

**and have ever-more-thinly disguised contempt for what I do**

I know what you mean, Tom. I've tried to keep this in check though as it can be incredibly destructive. Whilst for me, work is just something to do to get money to do the stuff I enjoy, I do try to at least *appear* to take it seriously while I'm there. I just can't *commit* to it mentally though - it's meaningless bullshit really - I mean we spend three hour meetings agonizing over a f@cking strap line for an ad when it just doesn't matter. My boss is a cockfarmer -'my hobby is Marketing' - can you beleive he said that? I really want to give it up and do something that genuinely helps people. That's my plan, but it seems difficult to break the ties. I envy people who love what they do, like my wife and my best friend A.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 20 February 2003 10:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Colin is getting pretty close to nailing it for me. The thing I find most off-putting and pathetic about there sorts of people is they are so plastic and so anal-retentive and so shit scared of doing anything that might look bad on their resume, yet at the same time their training courses and their job ads are full of bullshit about 'take charge of your future' and 'you're an individual', and they are too thick/deluded/brainwashed to see the contradiction.

I haven't actually heard of a company that has adopted, without irony, Pete Seeger's 'Sixteen Tons' as their theme song (which all Modern Upthrusting Companies must now have right alongside the Mission Statement and other miscellaneous hogwash), but I haven't given up hope. (Actually, I smell another thread here...)

Fred Nerk, Thursday, 20 February 2003 10:44 (twenty-two years ago)

What, "another day older and deeper in debt" is their company motto?

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 20 February 2003 10:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Merle Travis wrote "Sixteen Tons," not Pete Seeger

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 20 February 2003 10:46 (twenty-two years ago)

i like my job, it just doesn't require much work

one of the things i learn from knowing ppl in film production is that suit-type ppl with lots of money they want to put into a movie totally lose their evil sharkishnness (= how they made the money) and become rather sweet puppyish putty in the hands of my bad bad friends in film production (= how they will soon lose the money)

they think everyone in the arts is cool and hip and amazing: it's sad really

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 20 February 2003 10:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I'll take your word about the writer of 'Sixteen Tons'

I was referring more to the last line of the chorus:

'I owe my soul to the company store...'

Fred Nerk, Thursday, 20 February 2003 10:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Mind you Jody Beth, your line could apply to a couple of recent well-publicised turtle impersonators in the Australian corporate scene, such as the HIH fiacso starring Brad Keelingover and the extremely inappropriately named (these days) Jodee (real name John D, FFS) Rich.

Fred Nerk, Thursday, 20 February 2003 11:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Hate to turn into the resident ethicist here, but I guess my problem is mostly with people who devote themselves passionately to something they know perfectly well makes the world worse instead of better, then invent weasely excuses for why what they're doing is actually okay (which usually boil down to "I could be doing something even worse), and pat themselves on the back for the fact of their passionate devotion--as if hard work in and of itself makes one a good person.

Douglas (Douglas), Thursday, 20 February 2003 13:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Fun is finding an ELO record

. . . on 2 Many DJs as Heard on Radio Soulwax Part 4! Wahey! DON'T BRING ME DOWN

(I agree that it's not very nice cutting the line in front of jess.)

felicity (felicity), Thursday, 20 February 2003 14:01 (twenty-two years ago)

!!!? Where can I purchase this Part 4 you speak of?

Though I've just realised that Peter Gunne is what the My Robot Friend on Rough Trade's Counter Culture reminds me of.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 20 February 2003 14:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Like dope smokers, they are noisy, pretentious, self-satisfied and utterly uninteresting.

Hahaha, talk about painting with broad strokes? What if you're like me, you work at an investment bank and you smoke dope?

I agree with Douglas from the position that oftentimes I get firsthand knowledge of deals my company does that I think help to make the world a worse place. It sucks, but I'm not in any position to affect it directly, but I do think I can definitely influence things (well, since I'm in training, I definitely can). I mean, it would really be horrible if there weren't at least some people who work here who didn't believe in ethics or morals.*

*ask me later about our convertible bond deal with Tyco.

hstencil, Thursday, 20 February 2003 14:13 (twenty-two years ago)

I got it at Vintage Vinyl in Fords, NJ. Maybe on their wesite?

Track listing:

Intro 0:20
Deus "Everybodys Weird" (Soulwax Remix) 0:28
Beastie Boys "Intergalactic" (Soulwax Remix) 1:06
INXS "Mediate" 1:43
Run DMC "Peter Piper" 1:21
Arbeid Adelt "Death Disco" 1:23
Soulwax "Saturday" 1:21
E.L.O. "Don't Bring Me Down" 0:23
Steve Miller Band "Serenade From The Stars" 0:46
Rod Stewart "Hot Legs" 0:21
Flying Lizards "Purple Haze" 0:16
Kolk "Uma" (Soulwax Remix) 0:30
Stereo Total "Joe Le Taxi" 2:06
Deejay Punk Rock "My Beatbox" 3:06
Basement Jaxx "Same Old Show" 3:14
Donna Summer "I Feel Love" 0:22
Moloko "Bring It Back" 1:51
Jamiroquai "Supersonic" 2:22
Chemical Brothers "Out Of Control" 2:23
Pharaoh Monch "Simon Says" 0:54
Jerky Boys "My Name Is" 2:11
Moby "Bodyrock" 0:12
Simon Harris "Bass" 0:08
Marrs "Pump Up The Volume" 0:28
Bomb The Bass "Beat Dis" 1:04
Paul Hardcastle "19" 1:26
Public Enemy "Bring The Noise" 1:24
Weatherman "Poison" 1:26
DJ Spinna "Rock" 0:36
DJ Hell "Suicide Machine" 0:30
LRD "Jaques Your Body" 2:28
Freq Nasty "Boominbackatcha" 3:26
Dust Brothers "Shake Your Rump" 3:00
Alex Gopher "Party People" (Soulwax Remix) 2:12
Beck "Sexxlaws" 2:19
Them "I Can Only Give You Everything" 1:06
Blackstreet "No Diggity" (Soulwax Remix) 3:20
Brad "20th Century" 1:25
Digital Underground "The Humpty Dance" 1:59
Roy Keating "Jesus Christ Superstar" 1:17
Cassius "La Moucha" 0:44
Farley Jackmaster Funk "Love Can't Turn Around" 0:55
Zita Swoon "Disco"(Soulwax Remix) 2:25 Brian Auger & Julie Driscoll "Indian Ropeman" 1:18
Das Pop "Electronica For Lovers" 1:12
Outro 0:25

felicity (felicity), Thursday, 20 February 2003 14:15 (twenty-two years ago)

SEeing how many posts were added to this thread overnight made me concerned that posters had started fighting about young go-getters, which it appears is what happened exactly. But since the topic somehow ended up on record collections, I suppose there's a happy ending.

I don't hate young go-getters, but they're awfully fun to mock.

I also like mock sesame chicken (yes, I am going crazy at work today).

Sarah McLUsky (coco), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:22 (twenty-two years ago)

ah, but do you have PART FIVE??

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:26 (twenty-two years ago)

why, did you "go get" it already?

felicity (felicity), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:27 (twenty-two years ago)

i downloaded it from someone on ilx. i didn't even to leave my chair ho ho!

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Punk.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I bought both. like 'em both, though I think 1, 2 and 3 are better.

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Jess, you have a chair ho?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:30 (twenty-two years ago)

track listing, please!

felicity (felicity), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:31 (twenty-two years ago)

and because I'm a mere 28 that makes me a young go-getter! ho ho ho! I kill me!

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:31 (twenty-two years ago)

jess, your disdain for the copyright rights of hard-working bootleggers sickens me.

felicity (felicity), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:32 (twenty-two years ago)

The reasons why I sometimes get annoyed by other people around my age who are so go-getting is because a) none of them ever seem to realize that they are going to age and that events might not go as planned and b) none of them ever seem to think about how someday, they're going to die.

i guess this could apply to a lot of young slackers too, though

Vic (Vic), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:36 (twenty-two years ago)

1. Intro
2. Eric B. & Rakim: "Paid In Full (Coldcut Remix)"
3. Original Concept: "Pump That Bass"
4. The Beastie Boys: "Turn Up the Bass"
5. Max Berlin: "Elle Et Moi"
6. MC Solaar: "Le Nouveau Western"
7. Air: "Kelly Watch the Stars (Moog Cookbook Remix)"
8. Roy Keating: "Proud Mary"
9. The Kinks: "You Really Got Me"
10. Rolling Stones: "Satisfaction"
11. Fatboy Slim: "Satisfaction Skank"
12. Blur: "Girls & Boys (Bugman Remix)"
13. Jaydee: "Plastic Dreams"
14. NIN: "Closer"
15. Beck: "Get Real Paid"
16. Kraftwerk: "Numbers/Tour De France"
17. Adamski feat. Seal: "Killer"
18. Basement Jaxx: "Fly Life"
19. Super Discount: "Prix Choc"
20. Q-Tip: "Vivrant Thing"
21. Dennis Edwards: "Don't Look Any Further"
22. TLC: "Unpretty"
23. Junkie XL: "Check Your Basic Groove"
24. New Order: "Confusion"
25. Super 2000 vs. Daft Punk: "Around the World"
26. Old Skool Flava: "Refried Salsa"
27. Beck: "Salt in the Wound"
28. The Beatles: "Taxman"
29. Lenny Kravitz: "Light Skin Girl from London"
30. Foremost Poets: "Moonraker"
31. DJ Weight Problem: "Disco Horse"
32. Young MC: "Bust a Move"
33. Groove Armada: "I See You Baby"
34. Dirty Funker: "Future"
35. Dakar & Grinser: "I Wanna Be Your Dog"
36. Nick Kershaw: "Dancing Girls"
37. Michael Moog: "That Sound"
38. Art of Noise: "Close to the Edit"
39. Sensimilla Street

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh my god that tracklist is fucking great, so many classics, and Foremost Poets Moonraker is the unsung hero of the bunch.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:38 (twenty-two years ago)

i am keenly aware i am going to die. matos is right pts. 1-3 are better. (well, actually i've only heard a bit of 1 and 2, of course.) the fifth is much more "straight" mixed. it works well as party background music tho.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I like 4!

felicity (felicity), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm going to die!

felicity (felicity), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:50 (twenty-two years ago)

F-that, I just make it look like Im a young go getter to my boss. Then when he's not around, I listen to music, play on ILX, smoke, take a walk, photoshop. when he's around I make it look like Im really busy by putting a concerned look on my face and sighing. I also tend to ask him random questions "Hi Jim, say was it the results for the Broker Survey you needed or those other reports?"

Chris V. (Chris V), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Are everyone's parts 3, 4 & 5 like mine, i.e. some kind of cdr-type looking thing, i.e. not like part 2?

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:51 (twenty-two years ago)

..Or did I get ripped off?

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:52 (twenty-two years ago)

I think all mine are CD-Rs but they're pretty well packaged, I'm not complaining

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Okay: I am not in the least a go-getter, really unfortunately despicably not, to the point of possible moral laxitude, and yet still, yes, I was a bit surprised by the venom on this thread and was glad to see Mr. Diamond say what he said. I'm not sure how it works to say "oh well obviously we just mean the really bad ones," either -- there's something odd about saying "Group A is terrible" and then, when called on it, saying "well obviously I just mean the ones in Group A who are terrible." Also I might have a broader definition of a "young go-getter" than you guys do.

I admire a lot of young go-getters. Not envy, but admire. Usually I just get the sense that they have a clearer idea about what they want from their lives, and having a successful career is a large part of their particular idea. They want to work hard, impress people with their efficiency, put themselves in line for better and better positions, and leave happy successful lives with children and houses and vacations. The fact that they want these things does not mean they're going to stab anyone in the back to get them, or sell their souls; half of them would love to help you be successful in the same ways. They just want to try their best and be successful in the particular conventional way they've chosen. Good for them! Best of luck! Just because I'm not playing a particular game doesn't mean I have to cast aspersions on those who are.

Also I notice you guys are talking about finance and PR and law quite a bit. You can be a "young go-getter" anywhere, can't you? They're in every industry, even academic publishing. Sometimes they're annoying and sometimes they're nice -- just like anyone else, if maybe a little more likely to be prissy and rigid about things. They're in Radio Shack, too, I guarantee you: there are a thousand Radio Shack salesman out there running themselves ragged because they aspire to being store manager, branch manager, whatever. Ambition is NOT exclusive to rich or well-educated people.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:58 (twenty-two years ago)

haha chris v also pulls the "random questions to make you look concerned" thing

nitsuh i have never worked in finance or pr or law. my major work experience is in the higher ranks of college retail management and office supply distribution warehousing.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 20 February 2003 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)

damn it nabisco you're ruining the thread hijack! stop talking about the original subject!

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I think anyone who has time to post on ILE is not a go-getter.

felicity (felicity), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:00 (twenty-two years ago)

felicity otm

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:02 (twenty-two years ago)

They want to work hard, impress people with their efficiency, put themselves in line for better and better positions, and leave happy successful lives with children and houses and vacations.

Freudian slip of the month!

felicity (felicity), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:02 (twenty-two years ago)

nabisco, I guess it's because I took the young go-getters to mean people who have too much ambition, not any. I mean, I have ambition and I want to do well at my job (and by all accounts I am), but I don't want to be a self-serving putz either.

I should note that my brother and his wife got word that their bid on their first house was accepted today. I don't think that they're creeps for buying a house (esp. as they both have jobs where they help people).

hstencil, Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:02 (twenty-two years ago)

The fact that finance, PR, and law are getting mentioned is not coincidence -- there's really nothing injerently interesting about any of those fields -- they're pretty empty in themselves, and this type tends to fill that emptiness with AMBITION. It's a hell of a lot easier for me to believe that the hardcore Radio Shack guy actually loves what he's doing for what is (rather than what it brings him financially or how it allows him to define himself) than it is for me to believe that anybody really loves, say, mergers and acquisitions for themslves.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:03 (twenty-two years ago)

there's really nothing injerently interesting about any of those fields

I actually find a lot of finance stuff, esp. the more esoteric, pretty interesting, and not just because of my job. Finance is weird because for every 10th putz or so you meet (intelligent or not, you can still be a putz), you do meet some people who are genuinely fascinated by it.

hstencil, Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:05 (twenty-two years ago)

i hate this place, its corporate hell. i work in the finance field, even though my job has nothing to do with finance anymore. Back when I was a trader 5 years ago, I was fascinated by it and loved the fast paced atmosphere. But then the idea of having a massive heart attack by 25 made me stop.

Chris V. (Chris V), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:07 (twenty-two years ago)

So essentially we're just discussing whether "young go-getter" refers to "excessively ambitious" or just "particularly industrious?" I mean, obviously I totally agree that some people's laser-focused anal concern on getting ahead can get really fucking annoying and at some point morally dubious, and there are usually a couple such people in any given business or department. The ones I'm thinking of, who sort of impress me, are the middling reasonable go-getters, who are really hardworking and ambitious and care about doing a good job more than the average worker, but not to psychopathic levels (plus they understand that being normal and non-irritating is equally important to success).

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Nabisco is OTM.

Chris V. (Chris V), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:09 (twenty-two years ago)

**Usually I just get the sense that they have a clearer idea about what they want from their lives, and having a successful career is a large part of their particular idea. They want to work hard, impress people with their efficiency, put themselves in line for better and better positions, and leave happy successful lives with children and houses and vacations**

What I don't understand is - how do they KNOW about the career? Obv everyone know that lawyers, accountants etc EXIST, but how do they know how to fit in from day one, how to they know the right moves?

I'm 41 and I've sort of stumbled along by trial and mainly, error. You should see some of the bright young things that I have to work with - they scare the shit out of me.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:10 (twenty-two years ago)

I figure you have to leave yourself open for surprise. Otherwise all the big plans come crashing down in the face of immoveable obstacles.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:11 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, hstencil is otm in his first post: it's not about a lack of ambition, its about misplaced ambition...ostensibly i'm supposed to be making my living writing about music, but even that i treat half-assed which is my own fault. i could be tracking down new assignments right now, talking to editors blah blah, and that wouldn't make me a "young go getter" it would make me smart (smart = i like eating.)

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:11 (twenty-two years ago)

The Nabisco Scale of Go-Getterishness:

1. Admirable
2. Impressive
3. Inspiring
4. Just Occasionally a Bit Much
5. Acceptable-but-Irritating
6. Unacceptably Annoying
7. Enraging
8. Morally Questionable
9. Psychologically Questionable
10. Indisputably Psychopathic

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:12 (twenty-two years ago)

how do they KNOW about the career?

I dunno. For some people, I guess it's a calling. My brother knew from the time he was in probably middle school that he wanted to be a doctor, so that's what he did. He had a bit of doubt in the middle of med school, but he plowed ahead and he's now finishing the third-year of his residency in neurosurgery.

I've just kinda stumbled along. Getting a job in finance has been the weirdest thing, 'cause my mom and stepdad are both brokers, and for years as a punk kid I thought finance was the most boring thing ever.

hstencil, Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Heh. I sympathize there, Jess, except in my case I tend to think, "Why in the hell would anyone care what I would have to say about things when the only active 'scene' of new music I follow is neo-shoegaze and the rest of the time I just listen to whatever?" Therefore I don't ask. I remember Chuck Eddy saying in an interview he figures his new writers should know about/care about what's happening all around them, but so much of it is so nondescript or uninvolving I can't work up the energy.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Dr. C -- at least in the legal field, folks have been training for this their entire lives. It's just a matter of adopting a specific vocabulary, but the skills of impressing mommy/the teacher/the professor/the partners are pretty closely tied together.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Sometimes you hear people in the pub talking to their friends about the minutia of their job, office politics etc. Do you ever do this? I can't understand it. I drink and play darts with 5 very good friends who I've known for around 18 years. We're very close friends, but none of us has much of an idea what each other does for a living. It's just not important, we never talk about it.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:14 (twenty-two years ago)

and the best thing about it is I'm in charge of 4 people. Hehehehehahahaha. I stumbled along finance as well hstencil, my dad was a private banker for years and kept trying to pursuade me to follow in his footsteps. When I went to college to become a "record producer" he shit his pants. Eventually I dropped out, had no job, met a girl, made up a resume, took a series 7 exam and started a career. ugh.

Chris V. (Chris V), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Sometimes you hear people in the pub talking to their friends about the minutia of their job, office politics etc. Do you ever do this? I can't understand it.

I'll talk about it with friends who are in work with me, that makes sense. Outside of that, good grief, why? There are more fun things to discuss, like chickenbears.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:17 (twenty-two years ago)

My friends and I tend to talk about our jobs a lot, then it evolves into tits and ass in about 5 minutes.

Chris V. (Chris V), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Your jobs involve tits and ass? Ah, you run a porn firm.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:21 (twenty-two years ago)

chris, look at it this way, you could have turned out to be martin hannett.

ned, with me its more that i have an almost pathological dread of job interviews and each new pitch is like a mini-interview, which explains why i write for the same two or three venues every time i do.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:24 (twenty-two years ago)

I talk about work in the pub if there's something thats really frustrating me and I have to get it off my chest. And if that happens I try to buy my poor audience a drink.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:26 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't dread job interviews, I just don't deal with them that much. Maybe I need more practice.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I did work in the "industry" a ways back.

Chris V. (Chris V), Thursday, 20 February 2003 17:31 (twenty-two years ago)

the "industry" = young go-getter central

felicity (felicity), Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:04 (twenty-two years ago)

i am a (kinda?) young go getter because i had lots of school debt and needed to support my family. i don't mind it in the least. sometimes it's not a choice but rather out of financial survival. i'm in less of the "go getter" position now but yes, i would like to own a house some day and if hard work is the means to that end, then so it goes.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:46 (twenty-two years ago)

actually i love that nick cave song that goes:

love letter love letter
go getter go getter (or is it "get her"?)

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:47 (twenty-two years ago)

besides jess it is SOOOOOO indie to be slack.

all the pop stars are going for theirs.

c'mon jess : BE YOURSELF!

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:48 (twenty-two years ago)

duh... i meant LOSE YOURSELF whatever that pop song is called...

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:49 (twenty-two years ago)

EXPRESS YOURSELF?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:53 (twenty-two years ago)

(there was a born against song called "fuck yourself")

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Expand yourself?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:57 (twenty-two years ago)

jess: YOU SHOULD BE DANCING

felicity (felicity), Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Got to give it up.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 20:58 (twenty-two years ago)

(I wanted to start an ILM thread called "Didactic Hot 100" with that song as #1 but I am afraid of there.)

felicity (felicity), Thursday, 20 February 2003 21:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm working but i'm not working for you

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 20 February 2003 21:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I've worked in "young go-getter" jobs before, the sort of entry-level media/entertainment jobs you're supposed to be Oh So Grateful For even though the pay is shit (and that's why the pay is shit) and they exploit the living hell out of you and make endless demands on you in exchange for that tiny cookie crumb you get every two weeks, and a vague promise of a raise the company can't afford to hand out anyway. You know me. I'm an iconoclastic slacker. I had to leave that world; it was eating away at my dignity and my sanity. I felt like the completely phony networker fashionista pose I had to adopt in my dealings was just covering up for the fact that I was becoming an embittered asshole IN MY EARLY 20S, whining to my friends at the bar, getting migraines, etc. I was getting bored listening to myself complaining about my job (and I don't have a high tolerance level for other people's job gripes either), so I quit. And I'm really happy I made that decision when I did, because I could have stayed on and gotten stuck in a rut.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 20 February 2003 21:07 (twenty-two years ago)

haha and ned i'm expanding myself as we speak..where's my graham crackers

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 20 February 2003 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Now them's tasty. :-) We love ya Jess.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 20 February 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't agree with nabisco at all and I think he misses the point, as do all of you who think there is something to admire in people who are incompetent at everything except

A. restating what other people have said
B. lying

Ambition has nothing to do with whether or not you are despicable. Neither do yr suits or yr job sector. It's not even really abt $ as there are plenty of worthless 'go-getter' fucksteaks meandering abt abusing subordinates in extremely low-paying fields (food service! the military! etc)

Trust me, they're everywhere, and they are to be shunned, never respected

Millar (Millar), Friday, 21 February 2003 01:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought nabisco's point was

there's something odd about saying "Group A is terrible" and then, when called on it, saying "well obviously I just mean the ones in Group A who are terrible."

"go-getter" in this thread =

http://www.stangl-taller.at/TESTEXPERIMENT/BILDER/rorschachIV.jpg

(although I still agree with jess about the line cutting)

felicity (felicity), Friday, 21 February 2003 02:00 (twenty-two years ago)

That's a decapitated joker stuck in a pair of boots. Gimme my pills.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 21 February 2003 06:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Chelsea Clinton - go-getter?

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 21 February 2003 12:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Slacking is disco too Gygax! - "Responsibility to me is a tragedy - I'll get a job some other time"

Tom (Groke), Friday, 21 February 2003 13:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Millar you sound like a Good Charlotte song! I find it stunning that anyone should need to defend the idea that people who strive to do good work and be successful are by and large to be commended.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 21 February 2003 17:37 (twenty-two years ago)

nabisco. we are arguing semantics. how dumb is that.

people who strive to do good work and be successful

I never accused them of striving to do good work. My concept of the people who are the subject of this thread is that they have barely any idea of what 'good work' means. Striving to be successful maybe, but not by doing anything I would consider 'good work'.

Obv. yr concept of what/who I am talking abt and my concept of same are v.diff. - you seem to take 'young go-getters' as a term Jess is using to describe hardworking goal-oriented studious types of all stripes - I assume that since we are using the term to describe people we find worthy of derision, and therefore in this thread 'young go-getters' are actually a small subset of goal-oriented people who only work hard at looking good to the boss and are only interested in studying the various aspects of effective workplace sycophancy and machiavellian backstabbing.

I can't imagine you could read my posts to this thread and seriously think that I am referring to creatures bearing even a passing resemblance to 'people who strive to do good work'.

If you think that the poisonous invaders I am describing are simply phantoms of my imagination I can only assume that you have never worked in a large organization for any length of time over two weeks.

Millar (Millar), Friday, 21 February 2003 20:42 (twenty-two years ago)

NABISCO: "So essentially we're just discussing whether 'young go-getter' refers to 'excessively ambitious' or just 'particularly industrious?'"

MILLAR: "I don't agree with nabisco at all and I think he misses the point. . . . We are arguing semantics."

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 21 February 2003 21:01 (twenty-two years ago)

(I do think you sound like a Good Charlotte song, though!)

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 21 February 2003 21:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Now I see what this is all about. You are just trying to make me go out and buy a Good Charlotte album. Well I say HA at you, HA HA, I will just go look up a lyrics site instead.

Millar (Millar), Friday, 21 February 2003 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Whichever definition we use I think we could all agree that Radio Shack floor clerks could stand to follow their managers' examples a bit more than they do.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 21 February 2003 21:12 (twenty-two years ago)

They just have some stupid song that goes on about how getting a college degree is so conformist.

I must say, though, I do sort of care about the semantic issue! Because "young go-getter" is traditionally a compliment, the sort of thing a manager would say about a new employee who strikes him or her as particularly industrious or dependable or hard-working. Reframing it as meaning "incompetent back-stabbing asshole" just seems mean for no reason. It's like saying "fucking spics are so lazy" then turning around and going "oh I don't mean Latinos as a whole, just the ones who are lazy." We already have a perfectly fine term to describe incompetent back-stabbing assholes: it's "incompetent back-stabbing assholes."

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 21 February 2003 21:13 (twenty-two years ago)

maybe ppl in this thread did think YGG was used negatively.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 21 February 2003 21:15 (twenty-two years ago)

just maybe

*steam escapes*

Millar (Millar), Friday, 21 February 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)

By the way, Tracer, is it just me or does Radio Shack clerk- or manager-dom sort of seem, culturally, like law or investment banking for the working-class? I don't know what sort of corporate culture they've developed there, but the guys always seem like really slick, focused, get-ahead movers and shakers, guys who didn't have the time or money for higher education but are really keen on hustling and getting ahead. Maybe it's because they're usually interested in -- and surrounded by -- consumer electronics, it creates economic ambitions.

Actually sales in general have that quality, which I think is a great thing: it's a field full of those focused, ambitious working-class guys whose skill isn't educational but the pure ability to know a product and sell someone on it. And it's got to be awfully attractive, because if you're good at it you can start raking in loads of money when you're still really young, early twenties even.

I also sometimes admire people for having that skill, even the guys on Judge Joe Brown and such whose massive sales abilities are devoted to getting women to buy them stuff.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 21 February 2003 21:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah yeah but I mean why should we use "young go-getter" negatively? It's meant to be a compliment for hard-working people, let them have their praise without turning it all backhanded!

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 21 February 2003 21:24 (twenty-two years ago)

at the Radio Shacks in NY the floor guys are whacked-out mumblers the extent of whose knowledge is some unpredictable fraction of the mobile phones in the display case they find themselves drooling onto for hours, until somebody rattles their brainpan long enough for them to register the existence of anything besides their own brooding. the managers on the other hand totally know what's up with PC boards and even the difference between AC and DC, imagine that!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 21 February 2003 21:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I am glad that I don't work in an office (though you never know, give it a couple of years). I hate to be stuck somewhere where I'd spend even a tiny amount of energy bitching abt ppl that work there.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 21 February 2003 21:30 (twenty-two years ago)

I think advertising is a cool industry. I work in marketing, btw.

Sean (Sean), Friday, 21 February 2003 21:32 (twenty-two years ago)

My only objection to people of this sort is that many of them think their notion of success and worthwhile activity is the only one. I get that they are after different things in life from me, but many of them won't or can't get the converse.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 21 February 2003 21:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually sales in general have that quality, which I think is a great thing: it's a field full of those focused, ambitious working-class guys whose skill isn't educational but the pure ability to know a product and sell someone on it. And it's got to be awfully attractive, because if you're good at it you can start raking in loads of money when you're still really young, early twenties even.

This is kind of what I was getting at by saying that certain ppl just "get off" on being successful in the way that others get off on, I don't know, working on art, reading philosophy books, etc. types of things most of around here consider "interesting."

Thinking of the older brother of my best friend from high school; he and his wife are both in sales - I don't think either of them actually finished college, but I'm not sure. Anyway, I could never understand how someone could enjoy this type of work, but they really love their jobs, they'll tell you they just love the chase of selling people on stuff. And Nabisco is right, it can be very finacially rewarding. It somewhat irritating to me because I worked in IT doing sysadmin, and they both worked for IT companies (Sun and a smaller software firm). They were making scads of cash (certainly more than I was), yet didn't know the slightest thing about computers. They just knew how to sell the stuff effectively; and people who are best at that can be invaluable to a company.

Also, I actually have a good friend whose sister just got married to a Radio Shack manager. I've never met the guy but if I do I'll be sure to report back.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Friday, 21 February 2003 22:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Jess signalled the tone of the thread way back at the top by putting 'young go-getters' in inverted commas, which I (for one) read as distancing him/herself from the phrase, as maybe being sarcastic.

Personally I can't stand the phrase. I would feel bloody condescended to if a boss used it to describe me. It's like spinster Aunt Mabel calling her teenage niece 'sensible' (which would make the niece sound like Margaret Thatcher). Which is probably why I feel it belongs back in the Man in the Grey Flannel Suit era.

No, I don't have any problem with hard work either, I've even been known 'in extremis' to indulge in it. But indulging in corporate bullshit games contributes nothing to the organisation or the world at large (except maybe massaging the boss's ego) and is therefore not 'work', hard or otherwise. So why should we admire it?

Fred Nerk, Friday, 21 February 2003 23:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry, I guess I just forgot that working regular day hours for any sort of organized entity automatically suggests you must be a soulless automaton keying in efficiency statistics on Net Change in Number of Babies Killed, Fiscal Years 1999-2001.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 21 February 2003 23:18 (twenty-two years ago)

How do you think I spend my time?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 21 February 2003 23:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Wow nabs, if you continue to make this much sense we'll have to assume you are correct

Millar (Millar), Friday, 21 February 2003 23:23 (twenty-two years ago)

By 'work' I meant 'effort towards a worhtwhile outcome'. Counting dead babies in certain contexts (such as within the Health Dept) may be a perfectly worthwhile, even necessary, activity, in which I may have a genuine interest in the outcome.

But Plastic Executive Smith (except some image-consultant would have made a hatful of money by advising him to change it to Smiith or something so his businss cards look better) one-upping Plastic Executive Jones is not a worthwhile activity that anybody else need give a rats in hell about.

Fred Nerk, Friday, 21 February 2003 23:45 (twenty-two years ago)

arguments 101 with millar

Dave M. (rotten03), Friday, 21 February 2003 23:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Has anyone read The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit? I have it at home. (Breaks her notable lurk on this problematic thread.)

Mary (Mary), Saturday, 22 February 2003 00:37 (twenty-two years ago)

My roommate used to have that book but I never read it. Babbitt is probably better tho.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Saturday, 22 February 2003 00:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, don't worry, Millar, I'll get over it. There's just such general disdain among certain groups of people for the very idea that someone should dutifully perform a mundane office job that ... I just don't know, it gets me sometimes.

The funny bit is that those disdainful people seem to overlap really heavily with the people who say that Western standards of living are dependent upon depriving everyone else of resources -- as if their ability to even dream of supporting themselves doing something non-mundane depends on anything but. It's a total American thing, too.

This sucks: I didn't pick up the legendary Immigrant Work Ethic but I bought all the philosophy?

nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 22 February 2003 00:54 (twenty-two years ago)

I'll use post 200 to make one last effort at the distinction I am trying to make.

Suppose I am an articled clerk or 'junior' at a law firm. My 'mentor' makes sure I'm working my arse off but I'm happy to do it because I'm learning stuff, gathering skills and knowledge that will stand me in good stead if I ever get the chance to nail Skase (or un-nail Lindy Chamberlain or the Guildford Five). All that filing and reading case notes is teaching me about being a lawyer. So I have no problem with it, even doing it at the weekends.

But if I start to feel that I'm only doing it to show the boss how Keen or Committed or what a Great Team Player I am, that I am being rewarded not in knowledge for the future but brownie points for the here and now, that is a whole different matter. It then falls into the same category as telling the boss what a great guy/inspiration he is, or pretending to like golf or jazz music or hang-gliding or ancient Mongolian history because you've heard He does, ie the category of Crawling.

It's not the actor that defines the morality of the act, it's the act itself and the motivation behind it. Plastic Executive Smiith (from previous post) may well have 'succeeded' (defined however he defines it) even without managing his Corporate Image to within an inch of its meaningful life. If so, the very best of luck to him, and proof that he needn't have bothered with all that other bullshit that caused carping critics like me to cast doubt on it.

Fred Nerk, Saturday, 22 February 2003 06:44 (twenty-two years ago)

front of me while i was paying for my meal in the diner/tobacco shop

diner/tobacco shop??

phil-two (phil-two), Saturday, 22 February 2003 06:53 (twenty-two years ago)

anyone who actually has a job is a fucking square

dklgfthiopopiytoppojdhrtbnklmlkj, Saturday, 22 February 2003 09:19 (twenty-two years ago)

yay for the old come-bringers

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 22 February 2003 11:42 (twenty-two years ago)

two years pass...
someone just said that i "sound like a real go-getter." i couldn't tell if he meant it as a backhanded insult.

Volker Schlöndorff (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 15 April 2005 13:30 (twenty years ago)

Jody first of all please please change your name!!! I've heard those two words way, way too often in the past 4 months!!! Arrrgh!

anyway that depends on who said it to you.

nabisco was pretty much the only person OTM on this entire thread, which I just reread from start to finish.

Allyzay, Friday, 15 April 2005 13:43 (twenty years ago)

An involved thread in general. I like to think in the end that my ambition and laziness make for a good balance.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 15 April 2005 14:01 (twenty years ago)

yeah nabisco is really despicable on this thread. maybe not as despicable as this guy, tho:

I think advertising is a cool industry. I work in marketing, btw.
-- Sean (saturns...), February 21st, 2003.


woo-hoo!

i manipulate ppl for fun & profit, Friday, 15 April 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)

me too. just the right touch of each here and there has saved my ass countless times.

xxpost

AaronK (AaronK), Friday, 15 April 2005 14:20 (twenty years ago)

I'M ENVIOUS OF YOUR I.Q. OF 37
YOU, YOU'RE THE ONE
IT'S WRITTEN ALL OVER YOUR FACE
YOU, YOU'RE THE ONE
I'D LIKE TO TAKE YOUR PLACE.
I'M ENVIOUS OF YOUR I.Q. OF 37
YOUR LACK OF BRAINS JUST DRIVES ME CRAZY
ITS THE ONLY WAY TO GET BY AND BE LAZY
YOU, YOU'RE THE ONE
IT'S WRITTEN ALL OVER YOUR FACE
YOU, YOU'RE SO DUMB
I'D LIKE TO TAKE YOUR PLACE.
I'M ENVIOUS OF YOUR I.Q. OF 37
FROM WHERE I COME IT'S THE DUMBER THE BETTER
NO-ONE LIKES A REAL GO GETTER

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Friday, 15 April 2005 14:23 (twenty years ago)

Dude WTF with my abbreviations
I think I get angry NOW, look at THAT shit

TOMBOT, Friday, 15 April 2005 14:24 (twenty years ago)

Mongoloid, he was a MongoLOID!
Happier than you and me!
Mongoloid, he was a MongoLOID!
And it determined what he could see!

And he... WORE a HAT
And he... HAD a JOB
And he... brought home the BAcon
So that no one knew
Mongoloid he was a mongoLOID!
His friends were unaware
Mongoloid he was a mongoLOID!
Nobody even cared!

TOMBOT, Friday, 15 April 2005 14:28 (twenty years ago)

WRAAAAAAAAAAA WRAAAAAAAA WRAAA WRAAA WRA A A A AAAAAAAA

g e o f f (gcannon), Friday, 15 April 2005 14:30 (twenty years ago)

doing the synth part there.

g e o f f (gcannon), Friday, 15 April 2005 14:30 (twenty years ago)

Nabisco OTM

Plus-Tech Whiz Kid (Disco) (Barima), Friday, 15 April 2005 14:32 (twenty years ago)

I actually employ a few student go-getters as such. I appreciate them though the job itself is not exactly a go-getting one, making for a bemusing contrast.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 15 April 2005 14:47 (twenty years ago)

ah, the public sector.

g e o f f (gcannon), Friday, 15 April 2005 14:51 (twenty years ago)

That's school life for you.

Assuming, as is likely, I'll be looking for another job come summer, I am unsure as to whether to stay in the UC or not. Personally I still really dislike the idea of working a 'regular' job as such in the for-profit world, and frankly would prefer to be using what I've now learned over these past years here -- and to my pleasant surprise, I've realized that's quite a bit in quite a few different areas -- in something similar to what I'm doing (in terms of organizing information, making things hyperefficient, constantly improving what can be done as opposed to making one change and then never looking back), just at a higher level with more compensation and less layers to go through to get it done.

But this refers explicitly to the roof-over-head side of work in my life. In terms of writing, that's its own situation and I pursue that in different ways. Theoretically if I really wanted to be a go-getter I would be up in Seattle right now because -- and I don't think anyone would deny this, though I'm not saying this is the overt reason for its existing -- the EMP conference functions as a rock-crit SXSW in terms of networking and the like, as part of what else it offers. Am I missing out? Perhaps, but I'm not losing sleep over it, because I have been able to make various connections as I go while continuing steady if low-key AMG work.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 15 April 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)

anyway that depends on who said it to you.

this total "i like the way you think kid, you'll go far" coen bros. type. (and, helpfully, the hr guy at my new job).

Volker Schlöndorff (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 15 April 2005 22:09 (twenty years ago)

i think if you get that line from a suit/square/boss man what it really means is 'i like that you have lots of interests and ideas even if i do not really understand what they are'
recently i have been emancipated from the working class world of young fresh out of college go getters. praise the jesus for this. too bad i do not have enough pot to smoke all day long but it sure as hell beats passive agressive emails from aspiring manager types. not to mention 10000 other things. oh and look now an email from dear friend of mine saying no she can not go out tonight cause she has to work late dang

kephm, Friday, 15 April 2005 22:41 (twenty years ago)

it sure as hell beats passive agressive emails from aspiring manager types

arrgh kill kill kill

Volker Schlöndorff (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 15 April 2005 23:50 (twenty years ago)

Nabisco is the erudite me.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Saturday, 16 April 2005 00:56 (twenty years ago)

Well you can have a brand new nose
Light blue eyes or even hazel
A little ear will be much better
When you are a real go getter

Volker Schlöndorff (Jody Beth Rosen), Saturday, 16 April 2005 01:09 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.