Taking Sides: Another Think Coming v Another Thing Coming

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
"Think" is the original I think, but is thing the new thing?

Alan (Alan), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:18 (twenty-two years ago)

What kind of mentalism is this. Off north with you. What would "You've got another THINK coming" mean?

Pete (Pete), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Alan = Boris Badenov

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:23 (twenty-two years ago)

tis was always "another thing coming", I think.

jel -- (jel), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:23 (twenty-two years ago)

it's cos up north they sit drooling like vegetables and thoughts only come along every few hours

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:24 (twenty-two years ago)

yes, deffo, another thing.

MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:25 (twenty-two years ago)

"Think" is the new "Look Good". Finally we're here. Methinks.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:26 (twenty-two years ago)

I thik Alan's right: "if you think x, then you've got another think coming" is the original, 'thing' is an interloper. NB: I had a huge stand-up row with a gf of mine about this very issue once, in which I argued precisely the opposite point. She won the row by marshalling the testimonies of my mum AND her mum.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I've seen 'think' used in a number of older books, so I had assumed it was the original use. I've only ever heard people use 'thing' in everyday conversation, though.

ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:31 (twenty-two years ago)

THAT'S the kind of thing you people have huge rows with your SO's about in the UK? Blimey.

That's simply not proper English by the way, "another think"? Grammatically it should be "thought".

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Ally, this was in the 1980s, probably before you were born. And 'another think' is OK: "I'll have another think about that".

Except I won't you know.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't believe there's actually debate on this.
Think isn't even a noun, so how can you have one? You could have another THOUGHT coming, but that would mean something soooo different.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)

you can sit and have a think, so you can obv have another think later on. what are you on about? honestly.

Alan (Alan), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:33 (twenty-two years ago)

This thread is utterly unbelievable.

The phrase 'another think coming' has been around for a long time. It means 'you'll have to think again'.

There is no such phrase as 'another thing coming'. Where on earth do you people hang out to pick up these ideas?

N., please post and support me.

the pinefox, Friday, 28 March 2003 14:33 (twenty-two years ago)

If you think I'll sit around while you chip away my brain, listen I ain't foolin', you better think again!

dave q, Friday, 28 March 2003 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)

The phrase *is* used -- I've never heard it said any other way -- but I guess it's a bastardisation.

ChristineSH (chrissie1068), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:35 (twenty-two years ago)

do any of the people in support of "another THINK coming" speak English as a first language? I'm not trying to be insulting, I'm honestly curious.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:35 (twenty-two years ago)

oh please can we just not bother.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Listen, Tim, don't be smug about the 80s, I was there too, and you didn't see me having rows with my girlfriend about ye olde day phrases. I was too busy reading Sweet Valley High, which perhaps you should look into because I'm sure Elizabeth and Jessica Wakefield would not use the phrase "another think coming".

But I will, from now on, because it's hilarious.

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Horace, i think it might be a colloquial use that caught on and then fell apart. it's perfectly sensible, coherent and, most importantly, immediately transparent in meaning.

Alan (Alan), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:37 (twenty-two years ago)

dave q you'd better thing again

Tim (Tim), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:38 (twenty-two years ago)

This thread proves the British are all insane. Yes, you. I'm looking straight at you, and you are insane.

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:39 (twenty-two years ago)

After a bit of web research it does indeed appear that my haste was incorrect and Another Think COming is indeed correct, as it is the end of a grammatical joke which deliberately plays on the word (since think sounds like thing). The only problem with this reading I have is that for the joke to work, another thing coming must also be common parlance. Which the description suggests it wasn't.

Hmm.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Ally: I'm all about any SVH recommandations you may have. Was it a TV series first or did it start with the books?

I've even forgotten which of the Wakefield twins was the nasty one. But you're behaving *just* like her.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Books first (with fake made up author natch).

Pete (Pete), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:43 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, it's definitely supposed to be "another think coming."

"another thing coming" makes sense in a different way.

RJG (RJG), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Fake made up?

Tim (Tim), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:44 (twenty-two years ago)

After a bit of web research
oh, it's conclusive then.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Picking apart personal emails on interweb mentalist message boards, C or D?

Emma, Friday, 28 March 2003 14:44 (twenty-two years ago)

What would a sentence containing "another thing coming" look like?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Alan, PF etc are right. 'Think' does sound a bit odd but I always thinked it was supposed to sound cute. Like the formalised 'Say when' 'When!'.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)

There is absolutely no way it's think, you are all just romantics.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Picking apart personal emails on interweb mentalist message boards, C or D?

The Couch, C or D?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Think. As in I'm going to go off and have a think about this.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Of course it's think, good grief people, behave!

chris (chris), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I am in no way acting like Jessica Wakefield. I am acting like Elizabeth Wakefield, because she was the smart one and she would know that this discussion is totally insane.

They have a new series out, the books I mean, I seen them last night. They're called "SVW: The Senior Years" - why there is an 's' attached to 'year' in that context is beyond me because I didn't get the impression they meant it in an old-folks-home context.

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:49 (twenty-two years ago)

there's some think not right about this.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:49 (twenty-two years ago)

No wonder I never understand Ally. She's a mentalist.

Of course it's "think".

Sarah (starry), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Listen, I go to Columbia! I know words! Etc!

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:51 (twenty-two years ago)

You're not acting like Elizabeth, you're acting like Lila. Laila? You know what one I mean.

Sweet Valley Twins is where you are meant to start Tim, when you are a growed up you can move onto some Sweet Valley High. Sweet Valley College I remember thinking was quite DARK cos poor Elizabeth falls apart into ruin and destruction and gets fat and isn't a perfect size 6 anymore! And splits up with Todd! Does he start bonking Jessica?! I can't remember.

And the Sweet Valley Special series were mentalist. Did anyone read the one where a crazy gurl wanted to kill Elizabeth/Jessica and take over her life? Rocking.

Sarah (starry), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Judas Priest!

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:54 (twenty-two years ago)

The Goth Names thread is over here.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:55 (twenty-two years ago)

You're right, I am Lila Fowler. Good god.

Do you remember the one when they were shipwrecked? God, they lived such glamorous lives, it really set me up for disappointment when I reached age 16. The thing is, the new series, the "senior year" series, has Elizabeth already broken up with Todd and becoming quite a slut, and Jessica cannot be friends with any of her friends anymore and everyone hates her because of some indefinable thing that occured (note, it's probably not indefinable because if I actually read the new series it'd probably be clear within 2 seconds, approx.). I find it upsetting! It's very risque since no one who is actually 18 is going to read this, only young gurls read those books.

What about the Babysitters Club?

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 28 March 2003 14:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Arrgh - fence sitters!

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:03 (twenty-two years ago)

(spookily apt example tho)

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:04 (twenty-two years ago)

The people on the 'thing' side obv. never had a think in the first place.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:05 (twenty-two years ago)

bah! who do the british know about english anyhow?

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Further to what Horace said:

"You've got another thing comin'" was a UK number 42 hit for Judas Priest circa 1981. No, I've never heard it. But if was good enough for dear old Leather Boy Rob ...

darren (darren), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Americans ON OUR SIDE

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)

That's a terrible joke.

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I have always been a 'thing' person but in recent years have noticed that this makes me a mentalist. 'Think' makes slightly more sense I guess, but since when did idioms have to make sense?

Archel (Archel), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)

how on earth does "think" make more sense?
I blame television (and hstencil) for the illiteracy of this and all future generations. back in my day...

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:11 (twenty-two years ago)

At the risk of being unnecessarily meta, can I just say how much I lkove these Friday afternoon mentalist threads? (I know it's Friday morning over there, obv.)

Tim (Tim), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Here's an argument I prepared earlier

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:13 (twenty-two years ago)

I always thought it was 'thing' until a few years ago.

'Thing' still sounds better to me even though I now know 'think' is right.

(From oop north if it makes any difference.)

James Ball (James Ball), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Isn't it just your crazy accents making thing "think"?

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:14 (twenty-two years ago)


my ex-gf, who speaks Croatian as a first-language pronounces silent Gs as hard Gs.
which cracked me up all the time, and made her dump me for a hippy.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:16 (twenty-two years ago)

That's what I thought Ronan. But there seems to be written evidence.

Archel (Archel), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:17 (twenty-two years ago)

WHERE??? Where is this written evidence?

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:18 (twenty-two years ago)

No Ronan, it's hard to say the double k sound so people start to elide the two and then people think it's thing.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)

god, tell me I woke up in the bizarro universe this morning

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:20 (twenty-two years ago)

As with 'bran new' becoming 'brand new'.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:20 (twenty-two years ago)

But N that works exactly the same if it was thing in the first place aswell.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Horace, I strongly suspect you wake up in the bizarro universe every morning.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:24 (twenty-two years ago)

It's think. Think about it.
If think x, you've got another think coming = peculiar but amusing phrase
If you think x, you've got another thing coming = nonsense (unless x="you ordered 10 things, but only nine have arrived")

"thing coming" has become the more common usage as googlefight shows.

Simeon (Simeon), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:29 (twenty-two years ago)

bran new...

RJG (RJG), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:30 (twenty-two years ago)

another thing coming means you will get your comeuppance obviously, another think coming suggests you schedule thinking for various times of the day and spent the rest chewing your lips off and drooling and dreading thinktime.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:30 (twenty-two years ago)

YOU ARE ALL MENTALISTS. And smug ones too!

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Haha her name *was* Lila Fowler! I thought so, but then assumed I was getting her mixed up with poor ole Lisa Fowler.

Sarah (starry), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:33 (twenty-two years ago)

This is the craziest ile thread evah! You are all mentalists.

"Think"!!!!

Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I need a dring

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)

I remember all of their names. I don't know why I remember a series of books I read when I was like 10, but believe me, I do. Haha there was one called "Dangerous Love" and my grandmother was quite scandalised by me reading a book with such a title.

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Nicole is alas wrong, because Judas Priest sez: "You've Got Another Thing Comin'" -- and they are after all the heroes of us all. Because they're always BREAKIN' THE LAW, BREAKIN' THE LAW!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:38 (twenty-two years ago)

No, you've got it wrong AGAIN. I meant that it was beyond belief that anyone could even believe "Think" was correct.

Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Ned is so wronk.

Archel (Archel), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:41 (twenty-two years ago)

If my old friend M*tthew Dr*ng were to google himself and wind up on this thread as a result of Ronan's comment above it would be great. Hello Dr*nglet!

Tim (Tim), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Man. But at least we are agreed. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Could one of you 'thing' people please explain exactly what the 'thing' in question might be in order for 'another thing coming' to make sense IN ANY UNIVERSE OR GALAXY OR WHATEVER?

Emma, Friday, 28 March 2003 15:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Come on, Emma. IT'S THIS THING.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.raycomm.com/techwhirl/archives/9402/techwhirl-9402-00667.html

Quote:"
Judas Priest:
Someone suggested that the thingers might have been influenced by the Judas Priest song. Only 5 of the 48 thingers mentioned being JP fans.

CONCLUSIONS
What can we conclude?
1. The original word is think.
2. Those who think it is "thing" are now in a slight majority, however.
3. The think crowd is strongest in the UK and the eastern US, but
there were no strong regional trends.
4. There were no age trends.
5. Judas Priest does not greatly influence our speech.
6. The think-->thing shift may have been caused by people reasoning
that "thing" is a more common noun.
Most importantly:
7. "Thing coming" and "think coming" sound so much alike that we
don't realize the other phrase being used unless it is in print, it is said very
distinctively, or someone starts a deliberate conversation just about this
phrase.
8. We can't take communication for granted, can we?
/quote

I trust her, she cares more than I do and her name is Funkhouser.

Simeon (Simeon), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)

(*trying to rid self of mental image of neducation in action*)

Tim (Tim), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)

THING is open! That's the whole point of it, it's unspecified, like "things just work out that way" or "things that make you go..."

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Tim, why let go of that which compells you?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh why has this previously pleasant thread taken such a terrifying turn?

Tim (Tim), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)

But what is this other thing that we've got coming? Note: Could be a think.

Richard Jones (scarne), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:53 (twenty-two years ago)

the person who thinks X will get something other than what they expect, that's what the "another THING coming" is. There's no reason to think that said person will become reflective as the THINK camp would have you believe.

Best example I can think of: If you think it's THINK, you've got another thing coming buddy.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 15:57 (twenty-two years ago)

From The New Fowler's Modern English Usage, ed. by RW Burchfield:

THINK (noun). This late-coming word (not recorded until 1834, though the corresponding verb is OE) is labelled colloq. in the New SOED (1993). It is commonly used in such sentences as Have a think about it, and You have another think coming 'you are greatly mistaken'.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)

that's total bullshit.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Come on now, Horace. Have a think about it.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:12 (twenty-two years ago)

haha.

RJG (RJG), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)

You know, America was right to take out Us out of "our" words.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:15 (twenty-two years ago)

or?

RJG (RJG), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:16 (twenty-two years ago)

if noah webster had had his way you'd have TUNG instead of TONGUE.

RJG (RJG), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:17 (twenty-two years ago)

you'll be telling me that C&C Music Factory record was "Thinks That Make You Go Hmmm" next!

MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:23 (twenty-two years ago)


was that their way of saying fuck you after the revolution?
Y'know, like maybe George Washington said: "hey Ben Franklin, we need to make our own language, we can't speak English anymore because we hate England. You're a smart guy, why don't you come up with a whole new language?"
BF: "You know what would really piss those ponces off? If we eliminated the letter U, that would just fuck them up."
GW: "All right, go to it Ben. I'll see you in six months."

Six months later:
GW: "Uh, hey Ben, how's that eliminating the U thing going?"
BF: "Oh, it's so draining, in six months, I've only been able to pull out a few U fews where they weren't really being used anyway, like HONOUR to HONOR, HUMOUR to HUMOR, that sort of thing. But I'll keep at it, I think I'm close to breaking the code. How are things with you guys in D.C.? Have you come up with a new name for our glorious country? Did you like my suggestion of Freedonia?"
GW: "Uh, listen, about that, Ben. Me and the guys, y'know, the Fathers, uh, we kinda decided on, uh, USA. I know, I said kill the U, but we were all drunk and it seemed like a good idea, y'know, we were all chanting the same way we chant 'Chug! Chug! Chug!' Y'know, 'U! S! A!" it's gotta ring to it."
BF: "What the fuck, George? Why would you screw me over like this, especially after that Cherry Tree bullshit I gave you."
GW: "Yeah, well, I'm really sorry Ben. But y'know, that's how we signed the lease, USA. So it looks like we gotta keep the U. But we'll make those changes you already made, and we'll still pay you."
BF: "yeah, well fck yo."

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:25 (twenty-two years ago)

it was NW's idea.

RJG (RJG), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:27 (twenty-two years ago)

the actual real SOED says "Think, n.colloq, m-19th" = what eyeball kicks said

A "thought" is quasi-instant, ie the whatever-it-is that appears in yr mind.
A "think" is sustained, ie the activity ("having a think" = "putting thought to the matter").

Therefore the latter makes sounder assumptions about how the brain works = it is korrekt.

mark s (mark s), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:31 (twenty-two years ago)

I'll think to that.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:34 (twenty-two years ago)

That'll make a change

Tim (Tim), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:39 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.maryhillmuseum.org/images/thinker.jpg

mark p (Mark P), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:46 (twenty-two years ago)

= rodin's "un morceau d'un pense"

mark s (mark s), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:51 (twenty-two years ago)

morceaus are at least un pound these days, terrible isn't it?

Tim (Tim), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:56 (twenty-two years ago)

my head hurts.

jel -- (jel), Friday, 28 March 2003 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)

oh god, my BF/GW scenario is so funny. I've been working on it for months, waiting for the right chance, and now, no one notices...

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 28 March 2003 17:03 (twenty-two years ago)

it is historically incorrect.

RJG (RJG), Friday, 28 March 2003 17:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Could one of you 'thing' people please explain exactly what the 'thing' in question might be in order for 'another thing coming' to make sense IN ANY UNIVERSE OR GALAXY OR WHATEVER?

"Thing" is a pronoun for "thought"! Whereas THINK IS NOT A NOUN!

I still think you all are insane.

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 28 March 2003 17:05 (twenty-two years ago)

thing

jel -- (jel), Friday, 28 March 2003 17:10 (twenty-two years ago)

its this think

mark p (Mark P), Friday, 28 March 2003 17:13 (twenty-two years ago)

b-but Ally the word 'thought' had not been introduced so how can 'thing' stand in for it?

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 March 2003 17:25 (twenty-two years ago)

It's a euphemism, silly.

Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 28 March 2003 17:30 (twenty-two years ago)

THING STANDS FOR SLUGFUCKING ARE WE HAPPY NOW?

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 28 March 2003 17:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought you were on the side of sense, Nicole?

NOTE TO ALL 'THING' CAMPERS : we are all aware that 'another think coming' sounds odd, even though 'think' does function as a noun in certain other contexts ("I'll have a think about that"). But that doesn't stop it making sense. 'Thing' might be grammatically neater but semantically it is nonsense, slugs or no slugs.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 March 2003 17:40 (twenty-two years ago)

stop making sense.

talking heads (jel), Friday, 28 March 2003 17:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought you were on the side of sense, Nicole?

I am, which is why I am on the side of "thing".

Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 28 March 2003 17:44 (twenty-two years ago)

jel, I kiss you.

Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 28 March 2003 17:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I wish I had a scanned copy of Viz's 'These things are sent to try us' cartoon.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 March 2003 18:04 (twenty-two years ago)

all verbs become nouns when you put "a" in front of them

this is known as the "a put law"

mark s (mark s), Friday, 28 March 2003 18:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Invincible logic. I look forward to the attempts at listing verbs that don't work like that. Off the top of my head, I can only think of 'bugger', but that's only because the noun's already taken.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Friday, 28 March 2003 18:47 (twenty-two years ago)

yes people always say "HAVE A THINK ABOUT IT" don't they? erm....wait a second

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 28 March 2003 18:56 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't believe that this thread was needed. It is obviously think, it is the only way it makes sense, and all the history supports it.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 28 March 2003 20:26 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm so with the pinefox and tim on this one, THINK THINK THINK. (but i've been saying "you've got another think coming" to myself for 2 minutes now and there's something iffy.)

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Friday, 28 March 2003 20:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Of course it's "think"! Dear god, it's like I've discovered that you are all secretly rednecks. It has never been anything other than "think", and "thing" is such a terribly muddled non-phrase that I lose respect for anyone who utters it.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Friday, 28 March 2003 20:50 (twenty-two years ago)

So it's Ronan, Ally, Horace, Ned, Nicole and 80s Tim against the world. Hold onto your hats.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 March 2003 20:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Judas Priest hates all you "think" fetishists.

Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 28 March 2003 20:55 (twenty-two years ago)

This thread is mindboggling. I didn't realize it was an issue -- it's always been "have another thing coming" and no one has ever used the phrase "have a think". What's the other thing coming? Retribution.

I mean yes sure apparently there are some wacky Britons who feel differently, but if they expect me to change my habits they have another thing coming!

Chris P (Chris P), Friday, 28 March 2003 21:38 (twenty-two years ago)

you things think too much....

brg30 (brg30), Saturday, 29 March 2003 00:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Why are people tryind to turn this into a UK/US think?

N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 29 March 2003 02:32 (twenty-two years ago)

four months pass...
Actually, "think" is a noun. Just check www.dictionary.com. Harper Lee can't be wrong.

Another "thing coming" only appeared because it sounds like "think coming". Whenever the phrase its used, it's regarding thought: "if you think..., you've got another think coming". "Thing", in fact, doesn't even make sense in this context.

Shane Murphy, Monday, 4 August 2003 08:22 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't make trash like this thread, i burn it

unknown or illegal user (doorag), Monday, 4 August 2003 08:38 (twenty-two years ago)

This is probably my favourite thread ever, today.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 4 August 2003 09:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Who gives a fuck about Penguin?!

Anyone who believes that "another think coming" is a valid expression well and truly has another thing coming: A big fuck you! from me.

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 4 August 2003 11:27 (twenty-two years ago)

A Google search for "another thing coming" returns 10,700 results.
A Google search for "another think coming" returns 4,610 results.

And since this is a matter of coloquialism, the "thing" camp wins.

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 4 August 2003 11:35 (twenty-two years ago)

If it's a matter of colloquialism then on this thread, think wins 21/14 (counting Tim's Mum and his GF's Mum for think and 5 members of Judas Priest for thing)
The evidence is overwheming - THINK!

Simeon (Simeon), Monday, 4 August 2003 12:27 (twenty-two years ago)

i gotta agree with andrew - "correct" or not, when i say 'thing' i mean 'thing'. not 'think'.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 4 August 2003 12:29 (twenty-two years ago)

"you got somethin' else comin' to ya buddy"

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 4 August 2003 12:29 (twenty-two years ago)

This is hardly a reasonable focus group, considering it comprises of absolute tosspots and wankers.

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 4 August 2003 12:30 (twenty-two years ago)

I doubt the judgement of anyone who would question Judas Priest about such matters.

Larcole (Nicole), Monday, 4 August 2003 12:32 (twenty-two years ago)

three years pass...
I can't even imagine british people using this expression.

Good-Time Slim, Uncle Doobie, and the Great 'Frisco Freak-Out (sixteen sergeants, Saturday, 18 November 2006 03:16 (eighteen years ago)

This is an amazing thread!

(it's "think", of course)

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Saturday, 18 November 2006 10:03 (eighteen years ago)

i refuse to read this thread. it will only make me cross.

it's "think". obviously.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 18 November 2006 10:08 (eighteen years ago)

Have a thing about what you just said.

Alba (Alba), Saturday, 18 November 2006 10:29 (eighteen years ago)

I always agree with Simon. It's think. Because the full expression is "if you think that, you've got another think coming". It can't be "you've got another thing coming" because I haven't had a first thing yet, how can I have another one?

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Saturday, 18 November 2006 13:19 (eighteen years ago)

I'm with the "think" mob. The rest of you are all mad.

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 18 November 2006 13:22 (eighteen years ago)

another thing coming means you will get your comeuppance obviously, another think coming suggests you schedule thinking for various times of the day and spent the rest chewing your lips off and drooling and dreading thinktime.

This is Ronan's greatest moment, though sadly misdirected.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 18 November 2006 13:36 (eighteen years ago)

i succumbed and read the thread.

jesus christ almighty. some people really need a crash course in logical thingking. and basic grammar.

i really wanted to be pragmatic and say, okay, it might be a bastardisation, but "you've got another thing coming" is, like it or not, slowly becoming an acceptable idiom. however, looking at it written down like that, it's just fucking imbecilic. it's semantic nonsense. it's about as acceptable as "i should of done", ie not at all, even though millions of fucktards might say it every day.

so, sorry. no pragmatism today. now lock fucking thread :)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 18 November 2006 15:38 (eighteen years ago)

i always thought that people who said "another think coming" just couldn't pronounce words right. all the pro-thingers here are so obviously right, why is this even an argument. "another think coming" MAKES NO SENSE. why would you EVER SAY IT. "another thing coming" is CORRECT.

The Lex (The Lex), Saturday, 18 November 2006 15:52 (eighteen years ago)

i mean the issue is not whether a think is a noun, it can be, but it would not "come"! i find it difficult to express how wrong this is, it's so obvious.

whereas you don't have to have a specific "thing" before the next thing comes. a thing could be anything.

The Lex (The Lex), Saturday, 18 November 2006 15:53 (eighteen years ago)

this thread is like "Fog in Channel; Continent Cut Off" Part II.


timmy tannin (pompous), Saturday, 18 November 2006 15:58 (eighteen years ago)

i mean the issue is not whether a think is a noun, it can be, but it would not "come"! i find it difficult to express how wrong this is, it's so obvious.

Perhaps you find it difficult to express because your thinks ain't comin' right.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Saturday, 18 November 2006 15:58 (eighteen years ago)

the feeble attempts of the "thingies" to justify their pitiful beliefs are frightening. it reminds me of arguing with people about religion :)

this excerpt from the alt.usage.english FAQ is illuminating ... and dreadfully worrying. 60% of merriam-webster's editors obviously need forcible re-education, preferably using cudgels with nails through them.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 18 November 2006 16:22 (eighteen years ago)

I would just like to point out that in colloquial speech, "thing coming" and "think coming" are completely indistinguishable. Also, "think" is correct.

It's the lazy and immoral way to become super hip. (Austin, Still), Saturday, 18 November 2006 16:23 (eighteen years ago)

LEX OTM

Ed (dali), Saturday, 18 November 2006 16:24 (eighteen years ago)

It's 'think,' not thing. 'Thing' is the hand in the Addams Family.

Django Blowhardt (Rock Hardy), Saturday, 18 November 2006 16:27 (eighteen years ago)

I love how this thread has started a war in our house. Mister Monkey is another one of you "thing" people. And he always says "less" instead of "fewer", so that's how much he knows about language.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Saturday, 18 November 2006 16:34 (eighteen years ago)

If it's good enough for Judas Priest, it's good enough for me. Thing is the new think. Thing about it. I thing you'll like it.

Bobby Ganush (Uri Frendimein), Saturday, 18 November 2006 16:41 (eighteen years ago)

if you think that, you don't, necessarily, have another think coming, ever

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 18 November 2006 16:52 (eighteen years ago)

Because this thing is the summum bonum of all things?

Bobby Ganush (Uri Frendimein), Saturday, 18 November 2006 17:02 (eighteen years ago)

my mum was
i. a regular churchgoer
ii. of somewhat unorthodox conviction

abt three years ago, just after xmas, i was discussin some komikal then-topical aspect of anglican "politics" (ie some bishop had said something that got in the papers tho i forget what) and she said this:
"if they think jesus was the son of god, they've got another think coming"

this is awesome enuff on its own but by logic:
a. the anglican church is older than any body of attitude supporting "thing" over "think"
b. my mum could take the anglican church down
c. my mum could take down any body of attitude supporting "thing" over "think"
d. give it up!!

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 18 November 2006 17:13 (eighteen years ago)

right, bugger the grammar. mark, tell us more about your mum. particularly her thoughts on jesus!

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 18 November 2006 18:28 (eighteen years ago)

Yes, really.

It turns out that although I won the argument in our house, really I have lost it, because Mister Monkey has forbidden either version of the phrase to ever be used again. Bah.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Saturday, 18 November 2006 19:44 (eighteen years ago)

Time to switch to the Desi Arnaz version: "you've got another thin coming."

Joe Isuzu's Petals (Rock Hardy), Saturday, 18 November 2006 19:50 (eighteen years ago)

Results 1 - 10 of about 153,000 for "another thing coming". (0.09 seconds)

Results 1 - 10 of about 57,600 for "another think coming". (0.10 seconds)

and most of the latter were for message boards having this EXACT SAME ARGUMENT.

(more stories about mark s's mum please!)

The Lex (The Lex), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:06 (eighteen years ago)

yes, that's already been done upthread. i don't think "number of tools on the internet who think x" is a very convincing argument.

still, reductio ad absurdum:

Results 1 - 10 of about 1,400,000 for "stupid people". (0.12 seconds)
Results 1 - 10 of about 494,000 for "clever people". (0.08 seconds)

i rest my case :p

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:13 (eighteen years ago)

Results 1 - 10 of about 1,220,000 for "Should of". (0.16 seconds)

This does not make these people right.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:16 (eighteen years ago)

once the vicar was giving out church notices and got the day of some event wrong and mum stood up and said "how can you lie in the house of god?"

another time when she was doing a paper round -- she liked things that gave her an excuse to drive around the countryside -- a dog bit her, and rather than report it to the police she found out the home phone number of the chief constable of the county (i've no idea how) and rang HIM to report it "directly" as she put it

and once when the water was cut off for a day or so with no warning she rang the waterboard and went mental, swearing and everything, but not giving a name, then rang back a little later with the same compaint but very polite, and said "you really better do something, some people round here are gettin very upset" and the woman said "i know! we just had the most awful woman on the line!" and mum was tremendously sympathetic and said "that must have been terrible! obviously it isn't your fault!" and so on

she went to church every sunday and sang in choir and was treasurer of the parish council and i don't think believed a word of it -- she liked the sound of hymns and the company and a good argument

she was fun and i miss her :(

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:19 (eighteen years ago)

She sounded awesome!

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:22 (eighteen years ago)

xpost

mark: she sounds absolutely fantastic; an utter star. and the water-board thing is IMMENSE and i will be remembering that approach myself for use in the future ;)

accentmonkey: that, of course, includes constructions such as "the first word on the page should of course be ..." although most of the incidences are just wankers, yes.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:24 (eighteen years ago)

she not only knew the names of the composers of the hymns, she knew the the names of the TUNES of the hymns! (ie as well as the names of the hymns themselves)

(ie "when i survey the wondrous cross" is the name of the HYMN but the name of the tune most commonly used is ROCKINGHAM) (don't worry i had to look it up -- i just remenbered the word "rockingham" and googled)

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:25 (eighteen years ago)

i don't think you brits realize that "another thing coming" is really the ONLY way people say it here in the USA, and it's been that way for EVER (or like 100 years or something). "another think coming" may be common in the UK or the commonwealth, and (big if) it may have been the original construction of the phrase, but your "think" is really crazy in our context. (and this is all just a FYI for you, that's all, it doesn't really matter who's "right")

timmy tannin (pompous), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:25 (eighteen years ago)

grimly i suspect it is less effective in the days of ringback :|

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:26 (eighteen years ago)

mark she reminds me of lots of people i knew growing up! and she sounds fantastic.

The Lex (The Lex), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:26 (eighteen years ago)

it doesn't really matter who's "right"

*grabs popcorn, waits for grimly to explode*

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:27 (eighteen years ago)

do you think he might explode?

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:29 (eighteen years ago)

haha "forever or like 100 years or something" *dusts off domesday book*

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:29 (eighteen years ago)

i don't think you brits realize that "another thing coming" is really the ONLY way people say it here in the USA

Yes, but you are talking there about a country where everyone says "tidbit" because they can't cope with the uncensored power of "titbit". Anyway, it's not simply a U.S. vs over here argument.

Mark S, your mother sounds amazing and funny.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:32 (eighteen years ago)

I think high levels of apoplexy may be reached. I don't actually think he will literally explode (I may be wrong, however). I don't actually have any popcorn either. I am a BIG FAR LIAR.

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:33 (eighteen years ago)

FAT too.

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:33 (eighteen years ago)

hyperbole fever, catch it!

timmy tannin (pompous), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:33 (eighteen years ago)

Yes, but you are talking there about a country where everyone says "tidbit" because they can't cope with the uncensored power of "titbit". Yes, but you are talking there about a country where everyone says "tidbit" because they can't cope with the uncensored power of "titbit". Yes, but you are talking there about a country where everyone says "tidbit" because they can't cope with the uncensored power of "titbit". Yes, but you are talking there about a country where everyone says "tidbit" because they can't cope with the uncensored power of "titbit". Yes, but you are talking there about a country where everyone says "tidbit" because they can't cope with the uncensored power of "titbit". Yes, but you are talking there about a country where everyone says "tidbit" because they can't cope with the uncensored power of "titbit". Yes, but you are talking there about a country where everyone says "tidbit" because they can't cope with the uncensored power of "titbit". Yes, but you are talking there about a country where everyone says "tidbit" because they can't cope with the uncensored power of "titbit". Yes, but you are talking there about a country where everyone says "tidbit" because they can't cope with the uncensored power of "titbit". Yes, but you are talking there about a country where everyone says "tidbit" because they can't cope with the uncensored power of "titbit".

timmy tannin (pompous), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:34 (eighteen years ago)

i don't think you brits realize that "another thing coming" is really the ONLY way people say it here in the USA

You're full of headcheese, I've been hearing it as "another think coming" all my life.

Joe Isuzu's Petals (Rock Hardy), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:35 (eighteen years ago)

Another t'ing coming

jel -- (jel), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:36 (eighteen years ago)

Another round of thinking shall befall thee.

jel -- (jel), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:39 (eighteen years ago)

mum's use of it incidentally illustrates the difference between the noun "thought" and the noun "think" -- as she saw it, the entire christian establishment, faced with her heretical position, were going to have to go back through two thousand odd years of doctrine carefully checking their working, logic, basic assumptions, evidence blah blah -- which is "another think" rather than "another thought"; it implies DECADES OF AGONISING REAPPRAISAL followed by an APOLOGY

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 18 November 2006 20:47 (eighteen years ago)

this is correct but the think does not COME!

"you've got another think coming" implies a passivity on the part of the person who will be thinking which cannot be the case. the think does not happen to you, you decide to have the think. things, however, can happen to you,

The Lex (The Lex), Saturday, 18 November 2006 21:00 (eighteen years ago)

i'm off this thread before i go on a rampage and get sent to gaol, or have a seizure and get sent to hospital for a fortnight

timmy tannin (pompous), Saturday, 18 November 2006 21:03 (eighteen years ago)

the think does not happen to you, you decide to have the think. things, however, can happen to you

No, you don't decide to have it. See, the phrase is all about you going through your life thinking one thing, but then a "think" is going to come that makes you re-evaluate and make you change your mind. The think doesn't refer to you deliberately thinking. The "think" is a thought. It's not a grammatically correct phrase, it's a colloquialism.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Saturday, 18 November 2006 21:14 (eighteen years ago)

it's not *a* thought, it's a succesion of thoughts -- i agree the initial arrival of the think is involuntary but as the mind changes, you shift being er "being thunked" to thinking (ie by the time the think has changed your mind you are thinking, it is no longer happening to you)

i blame hegel

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 18 November 2006 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

also it IS *grammatically* correct! it's a noun (and a needed one or the phrase wouldn't have arisen in the first place)

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 18 November 2006 21:29 (eighteen years ago)

fixing the facts! ^^^

timmy tannin (pompous), Saturday, 18 November 2006 21:33 (eighteen years ago)

chambers gives "a spell of thinking" (coll.)
fowler says more than a century old (a century before 1926? not clear) (actually this may be the same ref.eyeball kicks gace up above)
in "usage and abusage" partridge says "an act of thinking or meditation" but also -- a usage i have never come across -- "an opinion": "My think is that he's a pretentious fool"

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 18 November 2006 21:36 (eighteen years ago)

haha what i mean it's clear that the noun "thought" wasn't doing the required work: you have to qualify "thought" as eg "prolonged thought" to turn it into "a think" (as per "i'll have a think about that")

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 18 November 2006 21:41 (eighteen years ago)

"you better think again!"

jel -- (jel), Sunday, 19 November 2006 10:41 (eighteen years ago)

"Thing coming" might have become more common in the US than "think" (which is clearly the only version that MAKES SENSE), but that doesn't make it right! I mean, this is a country where the majority of people I know think "drug" is the fucking past tense of "drag".

Melissa W (Melissa W), Sunday, 19 November 2006 11:14 (eighteen years ago)

> the think does not happen to you, you decide to have the think. things, however, can happen to you,

"A thought came to me yesterday..."

So, horseshit.

It's the lazy and immoral way to become super hip. (Austin, Still), Sunday, 19 November 2006 11:21 (eighteen years ago)

This is the thread which has finally convinced me that The Lex is not a real persona. All that music stuff was ridiculous enough, and the not knowing basic general knowledge, but I can't believe anyone would seriously think "thing" was "obviously correct".

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Sunday, 19 November 2006 11:23 (eighteen years ago)

thing makes perfect sense, i had never heard think in this context till this thread appeared

Ed (dali), Sunday, 19 November 2006 11:24 (eighteen years ago)

Which makes more sense?

"If you think [this notion thoroughly unsupported by logic], then you [will soon have to reassess your notions]..."

or

"If you think [this notion thoroughly unsupported by logic], then [an unspecified THING will fly out of the sky and into your FACE]..."

Melissa W (Melissa W), Sunday, 19 November 2006 11:29 (eighteen years ago)

Not just [an unspecified THING] but [ANOTHER unspecified THING]

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 19 November 2006 11:35 (eighteen years ago)

'a think' is not a noun recognisable by me

if you think that [such and such is going to happen] , then you have another thing [something else is going to happen] coming

Ed (dali), Sunday, 19 November 2006 11:38 (eighteen years ago)

Something else is always going to happen!

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 19 November 2006 11:51 (eighteen years ago)

Ed OTM. All you olde-englishe pedants explode with rage all you like, you're out of date, daddio.

1. "think" is not a noun. The phrase "have a think" - the only situation where it might seem like it's a noun - is a verb and the word "think" as a noun doesn't exist outside this context.

2. the logic of "think" doesn't makes sense. People are saying "if you think that, you have another think coming" - but the first think here semantically means "believe", and try reworking it with "another belief coming" - that's just wrong, beliefs are things that don't just *change*.

"Another thing coming" doesn't have an obvious root but at least it makes sense - thing is nicely vague and encompasses any kind of change that the speaker clearly believes you will undergo.

=== temporary username === (Mark C), Sunday, 19 November 2006 12:20 (eighteen years ago)

I don't really give a toss if people say "another thing coming", but they are pretty dumb if they don't understand that it was originally "another think coming", prior to the unhappy "k-c" sound confusing matters.

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 19 November 2006 12:31 (eighteen years ago)

Do the thingers ever say: "You've got another thing coming" with a different condition beforehand? "If you take that view, then you've got another thing coming", "If you do that, then you've got another thing coming"? I'm not sure they ever do. Does it not strike them as odd that the "another thing coming" only ever seems to follow when "think" is used?

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 19 November 2006 12:38 (eighteen years ago)

Well, and it's obvious that the phrase in general is a variation on "then you better think again". Grammatically incorrect, but conceptually it's the only way the phrase makes sense.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Sunday, 19 November 2006 12:42 (eighteen years ago)

it's a noun because of its place in the sentence! (hence not grammatically incorrect)

the ARGUMENT for "thing" is a classic piece of pseudo-pedantic backformation* which i. replaces a useful neologism with handwaving vagueness, and hence ii. murders the poetry of an evolving language

also iii. MAKES MY MUM A LIAR IN THE HOUSE OF GOD

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 12:59 (eighteen years ago)

duck s knows.

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 19 November 2006 13:02 (eighteen years ago)

*speaking of which here is a much better one -- to avoid the dreary vagueness of (modern meaning) THING, claim that "another thing coming" actually should be "another THING coming" as ref.the OE (fr.Danish) word THING meaning a VIKING PARLIAMENT

viz "they've got another THING coming" = the general synod meets next month

however this is made-up and inkorrekt despite excellence so yah boo

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 13:05 (eighteen years ago)

The phrase "have a think" - the only situation where it might seem like it's a noun - is a verb and the word "think" as a noun doesn't exist outside this context.

how can a phrase be a verb, mark? what on earth are you talking about?

as many others have demonstrated, the nominalisation process of a verb (there's probably a name for it, but i forget; like mark says, it's nothing to do with the root of the word but with the job it's doing in the sentence) works in many circumstances. have a read of this thread, then have a think about it.

this thread saddens me slightly; not because so many people are happy to mangle the language (i'm used to that, after all; and hey, at least ILX is one of the few places where the majority actually understands that "think" is correct!) but because it's a shame to see a small number of intelligent people coming out with such utterly specious nonsense and refusing to be convinced by the absolutely watertight semantic and grammatical arguments espoused by alba, accentmonkey, mark and a host of others.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 19 November 2006 13:11 (eighteen years ago)

oh arse, two "marks" in that post. mark s is the one who is RIGHT. mark c is the one DROWNING IN A SEA OF WRONGNESS.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 19 November 2006 13:12 (eighteen years ago)

need a witenagemot to get me out of bed

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 13:13 (eighteen years ago)

there is now a TOP WAY not to confuse c and s

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 13:17 (eighteen years ago)

i've just spent 10 fruitless minutes searching for sensible stuff on ye webbe about this. i didn't find any. but i did suddenly come to the realisation that it's a fucking stupid phrase anyway, and that the only truly OTM person on this entire thread is mr accentmonkey, for banning it in the house.

:)

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 19 November 2006 13:37 (eighteen years ago)

don't really give a toss if people say "another thing coming", but they are pretty dumb if they don't understand that it was originally "another think coming"

this is, more or less, my think

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 19 November 2006 13:40 (eighteen years ago)

that's a good thing, i think.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 19 November 2006 13:42 (eighteen years ago)

it isn't such a bad world, really, is it?

RJG (RJG), Sunday, 19 November 2006 13:46 (eighteen years ago)

claim that "another thing coming" actually should be "another THING coming" as ref.the OE (fr.Danish) word THING meaning a VIKING PARLIAMENT

I will excuse people who spell it "another &Thorn;ing coming".

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Sunday, 19 November 2006 14:23 (eighteen years ago)

Bah why didn't that work?

þ

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Sunday, 19 November 2006 14:24 (eighteen years ago)

Þ?

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Sunday, 19 November 2006 14:24 (eighteen years ago)

I will excuse people who spell it "another Þing coming", then!

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Sunday, 19 November 2006 14:24 (eighteen years ago)

Peeps upthread getting self-righteous about a phrase you've got wrong is great tho. Honestly.

Through a twenty deep screen of humourists (noodle vague), Sunday, 19 November 2006 14:28 (eighteen years ago)

can we have a thread about how 'chuck' (as in 'chuck that in the garbage') was somehow transformed into 'chunk'

and what (ooo), Sunday, 19 November 2006 14:32 (eighteen years ago)

"they've got another Ping coming" means that some stroppy blogger has linked to their post, mocking them -- and when they click through to read it they will find MUCH FOOD FOR FORT

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 14:37 (eighteen years ago)

> can we have a thread about how 'chuck' (as in 'chuck that in the garbage') was somehow transformed into 'chunk'

Yes, and also for how "couldn't care less" has become "could care less."

A third thread is needed for "irregardless."

It's the lazy and immoral way to become super hip. (Austin, Still), Sunday, 19 November 2006 14:44 (eighteen years ago)

That would be a fourth thread, though.

It's the lazy and immoral way to become super hip. (Austin, Still), Sunday, 19 November 2006 14:46 (eighteen years ago)

We've done the could v couldn't care less one before. That was a straightforward US v UK divide, I think.

I have, I am sure, never ever heard (or noticed) anyone using the phrase "another thing coming" before. I'm looking at a whole lot of you in a different light now.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 19 November 2006 14:50 (eighteen years ago)

Why do the British say "I couldn't care less", while the Americans say "I could care less"?

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 19 November 2006 14:54 (eighteen years ago)

i like irregardless -- it's the inflammable to regardless's flammable

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 15:07 (eighteen years ago)

Do the thingers ever say: "You've got another thing coming" with a different condition beforehand? "If you take that view, then you've got another thing coming", "If you do that, then you've got another thing coming"? I'm not sure they ever do. Does it not strike them as odd that the "another thing coming" only ever seems to follow when "think" is used?
-- Alba (albab...), November 19th, 2006.

Yes, actually, which is one of my reasons for supporting "thing"! And as I've already mentioned, I seriously cannot picture a Brit ever using this expression; to me, it's always been the domain of mafia toughs with Brooklyn accents, under whose use the vagueness of "another thing comin'" assumes a decidedly menacing quality.

Good-Time Slim, Uncle Doobie, and the Great 'Frisco Freak-Out (sixteen sergeants, Sunday, 19 November 2006 15:23 (eighteen years ago)

British people never appropriate phrases from films or TV shows ever (if indeed that's where it comes from, which I suspect it probably isn't).

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 19 November 2006 15:24 (eighteen years ago)

ooh, you lyin' get. are you 'avin' a laff? am i bovvered? etc.

can we have a thread about how 'chuck' (as in 'chuck that in the garbage') was somehow transformed into 'chunk'

?!

jeeves! my pistol and a bottle of single malt, please.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 19 November 2006 16:08 (eighteen years ago)

(GF, I was being sarcastic, as well you know. I just find it odd, one of the latest in a whole line of mind-bogglingly odd things in this thread, that someone can't imagine British people using a reasonably common phrase that may have originated elsewhere)

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 19 November 2006 16:11 (eighteen years ago)

one of the latest in a whole line of mind-bogglingly odd things in this thread

this thread is a nightmare from which i am trying to awake.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 19 November 2006 17:18 (eighteen years ago)

(I've also been reading all the other grammar/usage threads which come up if you do a google search on "could care less" "couldn't care less", and AARRRGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH - Take headache pills NOW, grimly!!)

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 19 November 2006 17:33 (eighteen years ago)

Care not less, could I

Think coming another it is

jel -- (jel), Sunday, 19 November 2006 17:58 (eighteen years ago)

Of course it's "think" originally. Does no one read anymore? Even Thatcher used the expression, didn't she? I give Judas Priest credit/blame for the popularization of "thing" though.

Sundar (sundar), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:47 (eighteen years ago)

Iron Maiden vs Judas Priest FIGHT.

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:55 (eighteen years ago)

Oh no, hang on, she was a lady not a maiden. The fight's off.

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:56 (eighteen years ago)

"Thing coming" might have become more common in the US than "think"...

fwiw: "I see I was up a stump again; so I played another chicken bone and got another think." - Huckleberry Finn, p. 186

A Giant Mechanical Ant (The Giant Mechanical Ant), Sunday, 19 November 2006 19:50 (eighteen years ago)

and that the only truly OTM person on this entire thread is mr accentmonkey, for banning it in the house.

Amusingly, he even tried to shout me down as I attempted to read out your post to him, so he could hear how right he was.

I'm beginning to think I've hit some sort of nerve here.

Thing! I mean I'm beginning to thing I've hit some sort of nerve.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Sunday, 19 November 2006 20:11 (eighteen years ago)

How was I not aware of the existence of this thread before now?! OF COURSE it's "another thing coming". Why would it not be? Anyone who says "another think coming" is 1x menk.

Also, "if you think x then you've got another thing coming" is surely only EVER used by angry matriarchal figures - it's a threat. Where "another thing" = swift blow with rolling pin. I mean, is anyone even able to read the phrase "another thing coming" without hearing it in a stroppy female Lancashire accent?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 19 November 2006 20:54 (eighteen years ago)

The phrase "have a think" - the only situation where it might seem like it's a noun - is a verb and the word "think" as a noun doesn't exist outside this context.

how can a phrase be a verb, mark? what on earth are you talking about?

Oh, sorry Simon - I thought you might have been able to figure this out, considering your job - you add a "to" at the beginning.

=== temporary username === (Mark C), Sunday, 19 November 2006 20:54 (eighteen years ago)

NO!

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 19 November 2006 20:56 (eighteen years ago)

This thread since revival = "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED"

timmy tannin (pompous), Sunday, 19 November 2006 21:00 (eighteen years ago)

Hang on Mark, that still only make "have" the verb. "Think" is still a noun. Like "to have a meal", the meal is the noun, i.e. that thing which you are having. In this case, the "think" is the actual thing which you are having. HAVE A THINK ABOUT IT!

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 19 November 2006 21:06 (eighteen years ago)

Mind boggling at all the people still defending thing!

ledge (ledge), Sunday, 19 November 2006 21:21 (eighteen years ago)

8 x menks: mr chambers, mr fowler as edited by mr burchfield, mr partridge, the 4 wise clerks of oxenford

my angry matriarch was born in newcastle and lived in filey b4 the war - mother from glasgow, father from leeds - but her accent was not a bit northern: she was a stickler for grammar, which is where i picked it up

"to have a meal" is a verbal phrase obv but this doesn't mean "meal" is a verb (i guess colloquially it perfectly well could be: "we mealed on the beach") (maybe it's how variety refers to a movie's catering?)

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 21:30 (eighteen years ago)

"we mealed on wheels"

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 21:31 (eighteen years ago)

Thanks Mark, that's the point I was making. To Mark C. Too many Marks! Gah. "Have a think" is a phrase consisting of a verb, an article and a noun. It's not any of them individually (I can't believe I have to spell this out). Though I have now, through a determination to prove that I am right, have found the existence of phrasal verbs. Except it's not one of them either.

(also I apologise for using "thing" at all in my explanation, it probably didn't help)

Seriously, who are these people who don't think that "think" can be a noun?

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 19 November 2006 21:42 (eighteen years ago)

(clue: get one dictionary - several definitions of think here, some of which are, get this, as a noun http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/think)

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 19 November 2006 21:45 (eighteen years ago)

The whole debate about whether "think" can be a noun seems totally beside the point: Here’s a case in which eagerness to avoid error leads to error. The original expression is the last part of a deliberately ungrammatical joke: “If that’s what you think, you’ve got another think coming.”

Seems like both versions are in common use though.

Sundar (sundar), Sunday, 19 November 2006 21:46 (eighteen years ago)

I notice that I used "have" twice in one completely ungrammatical sentence in my last post, thereby negating any authority I like to think I have. Sundar is completely OTM about the general ungrammaticalness of the phrase as a whole, which is why people going "but "think" isn't even a noun" are missing the point on every possible level.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 19 November 2006 21:54 (eighteen years ago)

Sundar is right, but sadly we all have far too much invested in this thread to agree to disagree now.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Sunday, 19 November 2006 21:59 (eighteen years ago)

IT'S NOT UNGRAMMATICAL!!

even if it's an incorrect usage -- ie a non-noun being used as a noun -- the GRAMMAR IS FINE bcz it's being USED AS A NOUN

(nouns becoming verbs and verbs becoming nouns are a standard part of the growth of english: there is no way a sound GRAMMATICAL argument can be based on any given word being forbidden this kind of slippage)

i am pro it bcz it is a stronger and more interesting usage therefore TO BE ENCOURAGED

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:00 (eighteen years ago)

Both Sundar's links have already been posted. This thread is going to the dogs.

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:03 (eighteen years ago)

I don't care about common usage in a world where people using "should of". Lots of people being stupid doesn't make them right.

Also, I don't mean that the usage of "think" as a noun is ungrammatical, it's not - "think" can be a noun, end of argument. However the phrase as a whole is silly. "If you think X then you have another think coming". You may not necessarily have another think coming. The correct implication of the phrase is that you SHOULD have another think about what you initially thought, doesn't mean you actually are going to. Or that you have to. Or that it will come to you just because someone tells you it will.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:06 (eighteen years ago)

Actually, if we're on a repeating ourselves tip, my first post here, made at 2:45 PM on March 28th, 2003. when I was still in my twenties sums up my feelings better than anything I have posted since.

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:07 (eighteen years ago)

(i like brian's pragmatic approach)

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:08 (eighteen years ago)

I have not yet met those who insist on "vegetables are healthful".

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:10 (eighteen years ago)

ailsa i disagree -- the phrase means that if you think that then soon and inevitably, confronted with the bitter cruelty of the world as she is (unlike yr absurd fantasy dreamland), you will HAVE to think again

it is confidently nay arrogantly determinist -- the jokiness of the pseudo-bad grammar underscores that, i feel, like gert frobe saying "no mr bond i expect you to die!"

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:14 (eighteen years ago)

skidmore considers vegetables healthless

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:15 (eighteen years ago)

Oh Mark S. You are so wise on this thread. Now, whenever I have this argument with people I no longer want to talk to, I will slam my hand on the table and shout "are you calling my imaginary friend Mark's mother a LIAR??? Well? Are you?"

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:21 (eighteen years ago)

Oh, sorry Simon - I thought you might have been able to figure this out, considering your job - you add a "to" at the beginning.

dude! i asked "how can a phrase be a verb", not "how do you make something an infinitive verb form". your "the phrase ... is a verb" statement is like saying "the herd is a carrot", ie a semantic impossibility. i do see what you think you meant, but ... it's still plums, so ner.

sundar: i admire your pragmatism and attempts at arbitration, but i fear it's too late. this thread will trundle on and on, with people going "thing!" "think!" "you're a knob!" "you're a fanny!" until we all die, and the martians will eventually discover its fossilised electronic remains and laugh themselves silly at the poor saps who think it's "thing" that anybody gave enough of a fuck to keep this going for so long.

xposts: oh god, now people who were formerly on the same side are starting to argue too. I GIVE UP. PLS SHOOT ME NOW.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:22 (eighteen years ago)

oops i just came on an endnote sayin tartly plz don't call me "brian" my name is "paul brians"

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:23 (eighteen years ago)

"Think" may have been the original but it's a stupid and overly cutesy turn of phrase.

I have never heard this phrase used in a situation where the person is actually expected to change his mind or thoughtfully reassess his expectations. It is always directed at someone who ignorantly expects one result and is therefore in for a surprise when the reality of the situation is revealed through an unwanted outcome -- the "other thing" that is coming.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:26 (eighteen years ago)

Fresh meat!

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:27 (eighteen years ago)

e.g. if you think any Americans are going to concede that "think" is more logical you've got another thing coming.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:28 (eighteen years ago)

once it's an argument about style i'm happy, bcz vagueness will always lose in the end there

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:32 (eighteen years ago)

I can't speak for the other 'think' partisans, but I am American and I am right.

It's the lazy and immoral way to become super hip. (Austin, Still), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:33 (eighteen years ago)

a sharp new tactic! walter is mustering the logic of managerialist compromise against us -- no one can gainsay a bland generalisation (he bethinks himself)

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:35 (eighteen years ago)

Also he has not read the thread. This tactic has been tried before, and we have stood firm.

Right, back to the Economist for me.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:39 (eighteen years ago)

The "other thing" is not necessarily vague. It's simply the opposite outcome of whatever the person is thinking. "If you think a thread like this is going to reach a consensus you've got another thing coming" The thing = consensus, the other thing = a clusterfuck of pedantry.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:42 (eighteen years ago)

"If you think a thread like this is going to reach a consensus you've got another think coming", that is "a think about the fact that people can't capitulate in face of overwhelming evidence of their wrongheadedness". Maybe.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:45 (eighteen years ago)

Exactly. If you expect the "think" version to have any relevance in common usage you're making a huge assumption about the amount of thinking that goes on in the world.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:47 (eighteen years ago)

b-but it's not "the other thing" -- which i agree would be much stronger -- it's "another thing", which is vague

actually i quite like "if you think that you've got the other thing coming" but no one ever said that before you in that post!

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:48 (eighteen years ago)

People be stupid! Let's give up and let the idiots take over!
xpost

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:49 (eighteen years ago)

What I'm really concerned about is how common it has become to spell "nevermind" as a single word. Did anyone do that before Nirvana?

Sundar (sundar), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:52 (eighteen years ago)

yes -- the point about a huge assumption being made is correct: "think" embodies a strong determinist claim, about a sooncome world-historical clash of apperception which will force the bethunked's puny brain into motion PERHAPS FOR THE FIRST TIME EVER

this is another reason why it's bad to substitute it for a phrase which merely makes mealymouthed noddage to the virtues of tepid pluralism so-called

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:53 (eighteen years ago)

forward to the sunlit nietzschean optimism -- we have nothing to lose but our stuff

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:55 (eighteen years ago)

and our tempers.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:58 (eighteen years ago)

Those poo-pooing the google results on the basis that "It's just the internet, people on here are all mouth-breathers who type 'should of' rather than 'should have' and are just generally idiots" would do well to reflect on the fact that "should have" returns 181 million results; "should of", a mere 1.14 million (behind even "shoulda"!)

Good-Time Slim, Uncle Doobie, and the Great 'Frisco Freak-Out (sixteen sergeants, Monday, 20 November 2006 05:51 (eighteen years ago)

Ally, this was in the 1980s, probably before you were born.

HAhahaha, this makes me think Ally is like a Macauly Culkin posting away.

Abbott (Abbott), Monday, 20 November 2006 05:53 (eighteen years ago)

This is the thread which has finally convinced me that The Lex is not a real persona. All that music stuff was ridiculous enough, and the not knowing basic general knowledge, but I can't believe anyone would seriously think "thing" was "obviously correct".

Haha, and it's the first time I've wanted to say "The Lex OTM!!" Although it's curious -- I do think there's a divide here between the UKers and the rest of the world and am baffled that Melissa W and Rock Hardy are so firmly on the side of the redcoats.

After having read this thread, I do understand why "think" was originally used, but I don't think that "thing" is illogical. I've always considered "you've got another thing coming" to function as an abstract warning, like "watch out."

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 20 November 2006 06:17 (eighteen years ago)

i tried pointing that out and was deluged in a sea of smugness and unearned triumphalism. they seem to be working under the assumption that "thing" is some newly minted mistake of Judas Priest vintage or even more recent, when in fact, it's been the usage here for generations (and I'm old enough to know what I'm talking about) and has become THE version, and it DOES make perfect sense, regardless of what some wag said in 1895 or some such.

timmy tannin (pompous), Monday, 20 November 2006 06:49 (eighteen years ago)

After this thread came up last time I ran it past my LJ friends and I'm afraid to say 90% of the Aus contingent (and a good deal of the US) said it was "thing" and were startled to hear there'd ever been any other version (self included).

The other 10% were the exact opposite; insisted it is "think" and had never heard otherwise.

I'm not going to argue either way, but I never ever ever in my 35 years til I read this thread knew it as anything but "another thing coming". And I'm the sort of pedant who poo-poohs "should of" and misplaced apostrophes and the like.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 20 November 2006 07:04 (eighteen years ago)

And it made sense as "...well then you've got something else coming to you" as endless people have pointed out. Which doesn't make it wrong, AFAIK, it CHANGES THE PHRASE COMPLETELY, doesn't it.

Anyhoo.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 20 November 2006 07:05 (eighteen years ago)

I don't understand the accusation that "thing" is more vague than "think." In Mark's own example "If they think jesus was the son of god, they've got another think coming" is apparently meant to refer to "DECADES OF AGONISING REAPPRAISAL followed by an APOLOGY." OK. What if they think about it and decide they were right all along? Maybe this deep spiritual "think" leads to a state of zen enlightenment. It's just not clear.

On the other hand the "thing" they have coming is quite clear.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Monday, 20 November 2006 07:06 (eighteen years ago)

Yes, I personally have always used this phrase to indicate that the other person is not merely wrong in the head, as all of you thingers are, for instance, but that I know a piece of information that they don't know which will certainly change their mind. This piece of information is the 'think' in question, when I use this phrase.

Of course nowadays I usually just shorten the phrase to 'huh, really?'

The wrongheaded phrasing that annoys me most these days is when people shorten 'every day' to 'everyday', which are two totally different things with different meanings. It annoys me so much.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:02 (eighteen years ago)

'think again' otm

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:14 (eighteen years ago)

which isn't to say that 'thing coming' isn't more common usage (even if wrong)

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:15 (eighteen years ago)

If you hear it rather than read it, you can't tell which it is.

It's the lazy and immoral way to become super hip. (Austin, Still), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:18 (eighteen years ago)

The other 10% were the exact opposite; insisted it is "think" and had never heard otherwise.

Conclusion: 10% of the population mistakenly hear the initial hard c of "coming" as a "k" on the end of "thing" and are in serious need of an ear cleaning.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:18 (eighteen years ago)

Google:

Results 1 - 10 of about 75,700 for "another think coming".

Results 1 - 10 of about 170,000 for "another thing coming".

Well, I feel vindicated.

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:21 (eighteen years ago)

Also:

Results 1 - 10 of about 1,220,000 for "Should of". (0.16 seconds)

This does not make these people right.

Results 1 - 10 of about 198,000,000 for "should have".

Without a comparison your statistic means nothing, and with the appropriate comparative figure your argument seems somewhat defeated.

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:25 (eighteen years ago)

Nixon: 47,169,911

McGovern: 29,170,383

It's the lazy and immoral way to become super hip. (Austin, Still), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:31 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, but we're talking about the state of the english language, not the stupidity of the American populace at a certain point in history.

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:32 (eighteen years ago)

snowyowl.jpg

It's the lazy and immoral way to become super hip. (Austin, Still), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:40 (eighteen years ago)

Arguments about the incorrect grammar of 'think' are beside the point.

On Curb Your Enthusiasm last night I heard the phrase "it's a whole ball of wrong" - now, I'm British, & I don't know whether this was coined by Larry David, or whether it's in common use in the US, but it's clear that the jarring (to these ears) grammar and the unnatural-ness of the image (even if 'wrong' is an noun it's an abstract one, so how can you have a ball of it?) is a straightforward rhetorical device (intent: humour).

So it doesn't matter if 'think' isn't a noun, or whether or not it can 'come'. It's still THINK, & anything else is a whole ball of wrong.

bham (bham), Monday, 20 November 2006 08:57 (eighteen years ago)

THINK:
Chicago Daily Tribune, Sep 24, 1898, p. 6
Chicago thinks it wants a new charter. Chicago has another think coming. It doesn't need a new charter half as much as it needs some honest officials. -- Quincy Whig.

THING:
Syracuse (NY) Herald, August 12, 1919
PITY THE POOR MOVIE STAR
If you think the life of a movie star is all sunshine and
flowers you've got another thing coming.

So the shift in usage is hardly recent.

from http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usage.english/msg/f8ba608b10ccd7e0?hl=en&

walter kranz (walterkranz), Monday, 20 November 2006 09:04 (eighteen years ago)

"A whole ball of wrong" is pretty funny. "Another think coming" may have been funny in 1898.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Monday, 20 November 2006 09:07 (eighteen years ago)

Without a comparison your statistic means nothing, and with the appropriate comparative figure your argument seems somewhat defeated.

Andrew, first of all you're just regurgitating quotes we already used upthread. Second of all, "should of" is wrong. It doesn't matter if it occurs less often than "should have", it's still wrong. My point was not that more people think the right thing, my point was that a great many people think the wrong thing, and just because you can search for something and get a lot of hits on google to prove its use, it doesn't make it right.

Also, it was pointed out upthread the first time someone corrected me for using that statistic that "should of" together in a sentence could mean something else entirely, so thanks, but I've already been corrected for that one.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Monday, 20 November 2006 09:27 (eighteen years ago)

Results 1 - 10 of about 2,320,000 for "could care less"

Results 1 - 10 of about 1,730,000 for "couldn't care less"

Melissa W (Melissa W), Monday, 20 November 2006 09:34 (eighteen years ago)

Andrew, first of all you're just regurgitating quotes we already used upthread.

Well, actually I was one of the first to quote Google upthread. I just did it again as the numbers had changed.

My point was that you need something to compare against in order for your statistic to mean anything at all. Of course x people believe the wrong thing. This thread demonstrates that at least some portion of people are pro-think, my point was that they're not necessarily right and your example of "should of" kinda proves that.

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 20 November 2006 09:34 (eighteen years ago)

(xpost) Argument DESTROYED!

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 20 November 2006 09:35 (eighteen years ago)

I do think there's a divide here between the UKers and the rest of the world

i don't, i think it is a divide between RIGHT and WRONG

I never ever ever in my 35 years til I read this thread knew it as anything but "another thing coming". And I'm the sort of pedant who poo-poohs "should of" and misplaced apostrophes and the like

SAME HERE.

The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 20 November 2006 09:36 (eighteen years ago)

Hang on, Melissa. Where are you getting those figures? I get:

Results 1 - 10 of about 1,420,000 for "couldn't care less".
Results 1 - 10 of about 1,130,000 for "could care less".

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 20 November 2006 09:37 (eighteen years ago)

From google.com.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Monday, 20 November 2006 09:43 (eighteen years ago)

This thread is insanity. Insanity I tells ya! Can you thingers not see the symmetry in the phrase, the connection between the two thinks? One think replaced by another! Why drag a "thing", a whole other category in there?

ledge (ledge), Monday, 20 November 2006 09:48 (eighteen years ago)

Round my way, we say "Another thing coming, it's coming, it's in the trees!"

teh_kit (g-kit), Monday, 20 November 2006 10:23 (eighteen years ago)

You are of course all aware that, of the myriad things a 'thing' could be, one of them is actually a think? So 'another thing coming' actually IS 'another think coming' and SO MUCH MORE.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 20 November 2006 10:57 (eighteen years ago)

and the point being that when the phrase is used it is generally NOT a think which is coming, it is a beating!

The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 20 November 2006 11:08 (eighteen years ago)

This thread demonstrates that at least some portion of people are pro-think, my point was that they're not necessarily right and your example of "should of" kinda proves that.

I agree that we're not necessarily right, but we are in fact right. Perhaps what is happening is that we're both using "should of" to prove our case when in fact "should of" is indisputable. Just as "think" should be, but for some mystifying reason, is not.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Monday, 20 November 2006 11:12 (eighteen years ago)

"Think" is correct. Lots of people use "thing". I couldn't care less.

Golden thread all the same.

ONIMO feels teh NOIZE (GerryNemo), Monday, 20 November 2006 11:22 (eighteen years ago)

Both of these are demotic slang and it's apparent that they both have courrency in different parts of the English speaking world. In California, I have never heard the 'think' version but that doesn't make 'thing' right or wrong. It means that in ordinary Californian English, if we use the expression, it's different than how some English people would use it. I know English people, espcially Northerners, whose regional dialects include things like 'me' for 'my' and the elision of definite articles, and other idioms that sound odd to my ears, but the large majority of them know that they're speaking dialect. They just don't feel like far-off pedants have a right to tell them how to speak. It's fine to seek consensus so that Iowans, Nova-Scotians, Geordies, Dubliners and whatnot can communicate but as George Eliot once noted, 'correct' English can be the slang of prigs.

I'd love to see if anyone can find the earliest usage of the expression containing either 'think' or 'thing'. Not that that will change my usage, but it would be illuminating to see.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 20 November 2006 15:50 (eighteen years ago)

Anyone have OED access? Dunno how they are on phrases but it's worth a try.

ledge (ledge), Monday, 20 November 2006 15:53 (eighteen years ago)

Wtf is 'courrency', btw?

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 20 November 2006 15:58 (eighteen years ago)

French money?

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Monday, 20 November 2006 16:00 (eighteen years ago)

I haven't read the last umpteen posts, and I certainly can't be arsed to argue a case which I know has no basis, but the fundamental issue is this: "another think coming" is UGLY and AWKWARD and SOUNDS FUCKING STUPID. We change things (or rather, the language evolves organically) that sound stupid, always have. So "thing" is right and "think" is utterly wrong. I expect Ailsa and Nick and all the other mead-addled woad-wearing menks to speak Chaucerian from now on or be denounced as vile hypocrites.

=== temporary username === (Mark C), Monday, 20 November 2006 16:14 (eighteen years ago)

When Mark C and The Lex are united, they can never be divided (from their enormous mountains of crack)!

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 20 November 2006 16:18 (eighteen years ago)

If I had a magic wand, I would change every post in this thread to M White's. I'd rather read that 400 times than even 1 instance of venom masquerading as "humor".

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 20 November 2006 16:23 (eighteen years ago)

An informal perusal of wiktionary and google results makes it look like 'think' was the original but also that it is very rare in the U.S.

Thanks, Lauren.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 20 November 2006 16:25 (eighteen years ago)

This is from the Oxford Dictionary of English - an OUP publication but not the OED so no sourced quotations. From the entry for "think":

"PHRASE: have ( got ) another think coming (informal) used to express the speaker's disagreement with or unwillingness to do something suggested by someone else: if they think I'm going to do physical jerks, they've got another think coming."

Nothing under "thing".

Incidentally most UK public library members should be able to get OED access via their library website. Unfortunately my library haven't put the link up.

ledge (ledge), Monday, 20 November 2006 16:34 (eighteen years ago)

"You've got another think coming" is used in Webster's 3rd as an example under the noun form of "think" -- but it doesn't give any dates.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 20 November 2006 16:37 (eighteen years ago)

i'm not surprised, since "think" is more specific, and ties into the first part of the sentence with narrative aplomb.

and yet somehow matt DC is trying to convince us that the generality of "thing" is somehow desirable.

well, it's horses for fields of competition, i guess.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 20 November 2006 16:38 (eighteen years ago)

Think.
Never knew people said "thing" until this thread.

Maria :D (Maria D.), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:18 (eighteen years ago)

I meant, thanks, Laurel. One of my cats is sick and I got no sleep at all last night.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:22 (eighteen years ago)

sorry about your kitty micheal. :(

Reverse what Maria said and that's me. :)

Sam rides the beat like a bicycle (Molly Jones), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:23 (eighteen years ago)

"you've got another.. another THINGAMAJIG on the way, my little man!!"

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:24 (eighteen years ago)

We change things (or rather, the language evolves organically) that sound stupid, always have.

I tend to agree, Barry. I just don't think it sounds stupid, just aq bit harder to get your mouth around. Plenty of people have no problem with saying "another think coming", so why should they change to something that makes little sense to them? As I said:

I don't really give a toss if people say "another thing coming",

Whereas you seem to be much more prescriptive about the whole thing:

So "thing" is right and "think" is utterly wrong.

It's just, that, like I said...

they are pretty dumb if they don't understand that it was originally "another think coming"

Which seemingly, you perhaps do! And I should clarify, by "they" I don't mean the man on the Clapham omnibus, who probably has far more exciting things to think about than the etymology of stupid phrases. I mean people who have gone to the bother of contributing to this thread and had to thing about the whole think.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:30 (eighteen years ago)

Question for the "think"ers: Is it possible to use "think" even if you haven't already used it at the beginning of the sentence, i.e.: "If that's what you believe, then you've got another think coming?" I mean, it never once occurred to me that there even *was* a first part of the phrase until now, since "thing" doesn't require a parallel structure, and so you can say "believe" or even just "Oh yeah? Well, you've got another thing coming, buddy."

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:31 (eighteen years ago)

If you hear it rather than read it, you can't tell which it is.

You keep saying this. It keeps not being true. Please stop.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:33 (eighteen years ago)

Jay - no, as I said above, I didn't even realise people said it with other conditions beforehand. I often hear it on its own, where the "if you think so and so..." bit is implied, though, much like people say "If I had a penny for every time someone said so and so" and then don't finish the phrase.

But to be honest, this whole thing has reached the point where I have no idea when and where I hear it any more.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:36 (eighteen years ago)

I notice that the juggernaut of this thread will not even allow itself to be derailed (can you derail a juggernaut?) by the news that Michael White's cat is SICK! I thought a sick cat was the end of all arguments on ILE.

Yum yum, mead. Also woad. And being right. Yum.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:38 (eighteen years ago)

I've got another drink coming.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:40 (eighteen years ago)

Nick, I think I feel this way because of my name, i.e. both the end of my first name and the start of my last name having a hard K sound, and I find it annoying and awkward to say - "Mark-uh C__", kinda.

Anyway, I'm glad you responded in a friendly fashion rather than being disgusted by my venom. I knew you would.

=== temporary username === (Mark C), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:43 (eighteen years ago)

The point is, people saying "THING" are using the phrase in a completely different context. This is NOT difficult to understand. I've never heard the phrase used in the U.S. in anything but a threatening fashion, and always spoken--I can't recall an instance of reading it in print, at least in modern times. It's not about, "Well, you need to think again," it is about, "If that is what you think, you deserve to get this." It's not really difficult to understand, neither word is technically grammatically wrong at all and the people getting rather smug and self-satisfied on this thread are exactly the reason why this thread was awesome in 2003 but not today. Everyone on thread can feel free to say whatever they like, but neither is actually wrong.

xpost basically what jaymc said, I reckon.

Allyzay Eisenschefter (allyzay), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:48 (eighteen years ago)

Mark Cuban?!?

xpost

Good-Time Slim, Uncle Doobie, and the Great 'Frisco Freak-Out (sixteen sergeants, Monday, 20 November 2006 17:48 (eighteen years ago)

I'd love to see if anyone can find the earliest usage of the expression containing either 'think' or 'thing'. Not that that will change my usage, but it would be illuminating to see.

I posted this upthread but I'll post it again. This is from alt.english.usage where people have apparently been debating and researching the topic for a long time. It proves that the "think"ers are dead wrong if they believe "thing" is a recent error or that the "think" version is more established.

THINK:
Chicago Daily Tribune, Sep 24, 1898, p. 6
Chicago thinks it wants a new charter. Chicago has another think coming. It doesn't need a new charter half as much as it needs some honest officials. -- Quincy Whig.

THING:
Syracuse (NY) Herald, August 12, 1919
PITY THE POOR MOVIE STAR
If you think the life of a movie star is all sunshine and
flowers you've got another thing coming.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:51 (eighteen years ago)

You've got them on the "recent" part, but per your own citations "think" is 20 years more established than "thing"! Err....

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:52 (eighteen years ago)

Yes, it's an archaic form that has fallen into disuse.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:54 (eighteen years ago)

Haha! Nice try.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:55 (eighteen years ago)

I think the last person I heard say "thing" was the same person who once claimed that Protestants are "more secular" than Catholics, ie WHATEVER, DUDE.

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 20 November 2006 17:57 (eighteen years ago)

England and America are two countries separated by a common language.
- George Bernard Shaw

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:03 (eighteen years ago)

Also, AmE 'moot' vs. BrE 'moot'.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:04 (eighteen years ago)

As in, irrelevant vs. arguable?

ledge (ledge), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:05 (eighteen years ago)

Actually the one that intrigues me is "career" vs. "careen" - as in "he caree*ed off the road". Neither is particularly logical - the former derives from road or cart, the latter means to put a ship onto its side for repairs!

ledge (ledge), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:11 (eighteen years ago)

This is why I hate subbing. Make it "you're mistaken" and send the fucking page, already.

stet (stet), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:16 (eighteen years ago)

As in, irrelevant vs. arguable?

Exactly.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:18 (eighteen years ago)

Wait, wait, so you've actually heard people say "think"? In the U.S.?

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:22 (eighteen years ago)

(That was to Laurel.)

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:22 (eighteen years ago)

Hee!

only just made the connection with leo rosten's H*Y*M*A*N K*A*P*L*A*N stories, even tho i've been rereadin em to write em up in freaky trigger

bein a GREAT MAN, kaplan wd pronounce BOTH THESE WORDS THE SAME WAY hurrah!

mark s (mark s), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:31 (eighteen years ago)

neither word is technically grammatically wrong at all

The point isn't about grammar, it's about meaning! "The curtains have are hungry, but you're superseded by the trouble" is grammatically OK but makes no sense. The "another" is the core of the problem, as I see it, with the thing version. If you just see it as a threatening phrase that's not necessarily coming to a different opinion, then it would make sense to say "You've got something coming to you".

It's not about, "Well, you need to think again," it is about, "If that is what you think, you deserve to get this."

Oh, "you've got another think coming" can carry a threatening tone. It's can be like "you're gonna get a rude shock if you think you can get away with doing that BECUASE I'M GOING TO HIT YOU, DO YOU SEE??"

Anyway, this is beside the/my point. Clearly, people do say "another thing coming". It has a life of its own as a phrase now. After a time, idioms can evolve to a point where, without doing some research, the component parts do not tell the story they originally did. But those phrases don't catch on in the first place without having a clear message. No one has convinced me that if you were suddenly to hear "you've got another thing coming" for the first time in your life, it wouldn't make you go... "huh?"

Alba (Alba), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:32 (eighteen years ago)

Anyway, I'm going to go now and weep for 2003.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:34 (eighteen years ago)

Wait, wait, so you've actually heard people say "think"? In the U.S.?

DUDE, SCROLL UP.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:34 (eighteen years ago)

No one has convinced me that if you were suddenly to hear "you've got another thing coming" for the first time in your life, it wouldn't make you go... "huh?"


It wouldn't for an American, though, Alba. For most of us, that's the only version we've ever heard and the think version sounds weird. When I first clicked on this thread, I thought, 'Think? That sounds wrong.' We also don't use, at least as far as I know, the slang noun 'think' here, or if we do it's very rare. It has a slight resonance of hillbilly speak to my ears, or of mainstream culture's comic take on their speech.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:39 (eighteen years ago)

To be honest, I hardly ever hear anyone speak this phrase in either version. Margaret Thatcher and Judas Priest are the only ones that stand out in my mind and both are from the 80s. I've read it a lot, though, and I'm pretty sure I've almost always read "think." (And, yes, always with an "if you think..." preceding it or at least implied.)

xposts Anyway, I'm glad I'm in an online community where people obsess over things like this.

Sundar (sundar), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:39 (eighteen years ago)

Don't whether I've heard anyone else say "think" but that's the way I know it and I must have gotten it out of a book because I used it in jr high sometime. HILARIOUSLY, the person I said it to thought I'd said "thing" and was threatening her; I don't think she knew how to take it when it appeared I was only calling her stupid with no implied threat of violence.

Nick, why are you being so literal-minded and taking all the playfulness out of this turn of phrase?! It's supposed to be a bit tongue-in-cheek, I thought. Maybe there's something particularly American about the linguistic irreverence of that?

Laurel (Laurel), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:43 (eighteen years ago)

For most of us, that's the only version we've ever heard

I know! When you grow up hearing idioms as a child, you don't question them, you just learn what they mean by the context. I'm talking about if you heard it for the first time, in your adult life; if the phrase had never existed till now. "If you think that, then you've got another think coming" would immediately sound like a cute play on words, that made sense in its own context, regardless of whether you ever used the phrase "have a think" or not. No?

x-post, there's the fun, Laurel. As I said in my first post to the thread. Well, it was someone's idea of fun, once, before the winter came. I love fun! Don't I??????????

Right I REALLY AM GOING NOW.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:46 (eighteen years ago)

I've let my mulled wine boil now. NO FUN.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:47 (eighteen years ago)

Wait, wait, so you've actually heard people say "think"? In the U.S.?

-- jaymc (jmcunnin...), November 20th, 2006. (later)

I've heard myself say it in the US. I thought I hear other people saying it too, but I guess I have another think coming.

Maria :D (Maria D.), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:50 (eighteen years ago)

"If you think that, then you've got another think coming" would immediately sound like a cute play on words, that made sense in its own context, regardless of whether you ever used the phrase "have a think" or not. No?

No. It's a mildly clever play on words if "another thing coming" is already recognized. Otherwise it's just silly.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:51 (eighteen years ago)

d
xpost

Maria :D (Maria D.), Monday, 20 November 2006 18:51 (eighteen years ago)

From OED
think, n.

b. to have another think coming: to be greatly mistaken.

1937 Amer. Speech XII. 317/1 Several different statements used for the same idea{em}that of some one's making a mistake...[e.g.] you have another think coming. 1942 T. BAILEY Pink Camellia xxvii. 199 If you think you can get me out of Gaywood, you have another think coming. 1979 Jrnl. R. Soc. Arts CXXVII. 221/2 Any design consultant who thinks he is going to get British Leyland right by himself on his own has got another think coming.

think, n.
to have another thing coming [arising from misapprehension of to have another think coming s.v. THINK n. 2b] = to have another think coming s.v. THINK n. 2b.

1919 Syracuse (N.Y.) Herald 12 Aug. 8/3 If you think the life of a movie star is all sunshine and flowers you've got another thing coming. 1959 Lethbridge (Alberta, Canada) Herald 22 Aug. 20/3 Magistrate Edward Robey told them: ‘Please tell your friends in France that if any more come over here thinking they can put money in slot machines and get money galore, they have got another thing coming.’ 1971 N.Y. Times 26 Feb. 37/4 One of those taken into custody identified himself as ‘very prominent in the community’ and declared, ‘After this, if the police think they are getting a raise they've got another thing coming.’ 1981 J. SULLIVAN Only Fools & Horses (1999) I. 1st Ser. Episode 1. 57 Del. If you think I'm staying in a lead-lined nissan hut with you and Grandad and a chemical bloody khazi you've got another thing coming. 1998 A. O'HANLON Talk of Town (1999) I. iv. 60 If you think you're getting into my knickers, you have another thing coming.

(sorry, don't know how the formatting will come out)

liz (lizg), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 16:02 (eighteen years ago)

o god, is this thread still going? i thought everybody had moved on to the kramer fite.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 16:13 (eighteen years ago)

If you think you can get me out of Gaywood, you have another think coming.

!!

M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 16:18 (eighteen years ago)

two years pass...

Interlocutor: People with navels that recede are innies. Those whose navels protrude are outies. Are you an innie or an outie?

Responder: If you think I will respond to that, you have another think coming.

Interlocutor: I see you are a ninny. To proceed with our enquiries: Inch Me and Pinch Me were in a boat...

Aimless, Saturday, 22 November 2008 20:24 (sixteen years ago)

Jesus wept. This thread.

grimly fiendish, Saturday, 22 November 2008 23:28 (sixteen years ago)

No results found for "another bottle opener coming".

velko, Saturday, 22 November 2008 23:40 (sixteen years ago)

Results 1 - 10 of about 622 for thinkoming. (0.15 seconds)

Aimless, Sunday, 23 November 2008 00:41 (sixteen years ago)

Another think coming

is the best language mutation, haters step off.

Abbott of the Trapezoid Monks (Abbott), Sunday, 23 November 2008 00:47 (sixteen years ago)

Jesus wept. This thread.

This is ILX's own Pred Ship debate.

Me and Ruth Lorenzo, Rollin' in the Benzo (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 23 November 2008 01:06 (sixteen years ago)

one month passes...

371 posts, not counting this one? Could we not have seen this thing coming and avoided it?

Aimless, Friday, 2 January 2009 19:12 (sixteen years ago)

I thing not!

Abbott of the Trapezoid Monks (Abbott), Friday, 2 January 2009 19:18 (sixteen years ago)

I doubt the judgement of anyone who would question Judas Priest about such matters.

― Larcole (Nicole)

At last, some sense.

moley, Saturday, 3 January 2009 23:34 (sixteen years ago)

nine months pass...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2009/oct/13/ridley-scott-alien-ripley
In its opening sections, Alien rattles, seemingly aimlessly, around a utilitarian space freighter (the Nostromo) and introduces us to its bickering seven-member crew, John Hurt and Ian Holm among them. If 20th Century Fox was hoping for another Star Wars (and the evidence suggests it was), the studio had another think coming.

modescalator (blueski), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:06 (sixteen years ago)

what's the problem here? pinefox closed this argument after about 5 posts.

Brewer's Bitch (darraghmac), Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:11 (sixteen years ago)

eight months pass...

jeebus -- I'm not one to say mean things but I'm offended that anybody thought up "another think coming" in the 19th century, and stewing in my own anger that people use that phrase. Thing, thing, thing...

spidermark, Monday, 12 July 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~regojpb/page2/files/page2-1025-full.jpg

postcards from the (ledge), Monday, 12 July 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~regojpb/page2/files/page2-1019-full.html

postcards from the (ledge), Monday, 12 July 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~regojpb/page2/files/page2-1029-full.jpg

postcards from the (ledge), Monday, 12 July 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~regojpb/page2/files/page2-1019-full.jpg

postcards from the (ledge), Monday, 12 July 2010 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

that was the light in the tunnel I needed

spidermark, Monday, 12 July 2010 17:31 (fifteen years ago)

ALOT

conrad, Monday, 12 July 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

I try not to get into grammar pedant arguments but anybody who prefers "thing" here is a cloth-eared, cloth-brained churl.

Orange You Glad I Didn't Say Mañana? (Noodle Vague), Monday, 12 July 2010 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

INTERESTING LINKS:

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/05/04/the_think_thing/?page=2

"This misuse of think as a noun is creeping into the speech of many who seem unaware that it is ungrammatical." Mary Weesen in reference to "another think coming" quote!

http://grammartips.homestead.com/anotherthink.html (really smug article, probably written by someone in this thread)

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/have_another_thing_coming

so in conclusion this is like the star bellied sneetches, who gives a crap.

San Te, Monday, 12 July 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

I'm having a laugh

les yeux sans aerosmith (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, 12 July 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

The misapplication of seriousness is creeping into the discourse of many who seem unaware of the playful use of language.

Aimless, Monday, 12 July 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

Misapplication of seriousness is a standard gambit in playful use of language iirc

Orange You Glad I Didn't Say Mañana? (Noodle Vague), Monday, 12 July 2010 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

nine months pass...

PROVEN BY SCIENCE, DOLTS

bell hops (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 13:16 (fourteen years ago)

You're Kiddink?

Mark G, Tuesday, 3 May 2011 13:19 (fourteen years ago)

Hah! Think wins! That relieves a horrible tension I had not experienced before reading this thread; viz. that 'another thing coming' could possibly be considered to make sense in any context other than 'there is one Thing under the bed ALREADY and another Thing is on the way...'

Confused Turtle (Zora), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 14:57 (fourteen years ago)

i always thought that people who said "another think coming" just couldn't pronounce words right. all the pro-thingers here are so obviously right, why is this even an argument. "another think coming" MAKES NO SENSE. why would you EVER SAY IT. "another thing coming" is CORRECT.
― The Lex (The Lex), Saturday, 18 November 2006 15:52 (4 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

this might be my favourite lex post of all time.

standing on the shoulders of pissants (ledge), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 16:11 (fourteen years ago)

two years pass...

"unchartered territory"

rmmfe wtf is wrong with people?

The drone that was played caused panic and confusion (Noodle Vague), Monday, 24 June 2013 11:47 (twelve years ago)

i'm not a grammar nazi but i may be a meaning nazi

The drone that was played caused panic and confusion (Noodle Vague), Monday, 24 June 2013 11:47 (twelve years ago)

five months pass...

only a year since they changed editor and christ this fucking paper isnt worth a shit at this stage

http://www.irishtimes.com/sport/soccer/champions-league/manchester-city-give-bayern-munich-something-to-thing-about-1.1623699

mind totally brown (darraghmac), Tuesday, 10 December 2013 23:15 (eleven years ago)

six years pass...

Judas Priest muddies the water on this roight

I hear that sometimes Satan wants to defund police (Neanderthal), Thursday, 9 July 2020 02:57 (five years ago)

this is an incredibly stressful thread to read through

Lily Dale, Thursday, 9 July 2020 17:35 (five years ago)

Hm, earliest citation in the current OED Online for "another think coming" is 1896 but earliest citation for "another thing coming" is 1897. Both American.

c. to have another think coming: to be greatly mistaken. Cf. to have another thing coming at thing n.1 Phrases 16.

1896 Sunday Jrnl. (Indianapolis) 23 Feb. 10/1 ‘Oh, you think you've seen me, do you?’ and once more that voice gurgled in his ear. ‘Well, you've got another think coming.’
1897 Buffalo (N.Y.) Enquirer (Evening ed.) 12 June 6/4 People who witness the [cycle] races..often see men protest one another..and..imagine that these battles and quarrels of the track are carried on after the races are over. The people who think this ‘have another think coming’, for the men travel in one of the most peaceful parties that follows any line of sport.
1898 Syracuse (N.Y.) Standard 21 May 8/1 Conroy lives in Troy and thinks he is a corning fighter. This gentleman has another think coming.
1942 T. Bailey Pink Camellia xxvii. 199 If you think you can get me out of Gaywood, you have another think coming.
2002 Independent 29 Aug. 17/7 If he thinks he will be blissfully free of directives and paperwork, he has another think coming.

P16. to have another thing coming [arising from misapprehension of to have another think coming at think n. 1c] = to have another think coming at think n. 1c.

1897 Elmira (N.Y.) Daily Gaz. & Free Press 24 June 3/2 They imagine that these battles and quarrels of the track are carried on after the races are over. The people who think this ‘have another thing coming’, for the men travel in one of the most peaceful parties that follows any line of sport.
1902 Logansport (Indiana) Daily Reporter 7 Oct. 3/4 No matter what science tells us, it always seems to have ‘another thing coming’. This census bulletin which links long life with the fast one appears to be the other ‘think’.
1906 G. Wilshire Wilshire Editorials 214 Now if we should try and think up some one person who is satisfied with the existing order of things.., we would most likely have thought that we should find him in the editor of the Wall Street Journal. But if we did, then we have another thing [1904 Wilshire's Mag. think] coming.
1919 Syracuse (N.Y.) Herald 12 Aug. 8/3 If you think the life of a movie star is all sunshine and flowers you've got another thing coming.
1959 Lethbridge (Alberta, Canada) Herald 22 Aug. 20/3 Magistrate Edward Robey told them: ‘Please tell your friends in France that if any more come over here thinking they can put money in slot machines and get money galore, they have got another thing coming.’
1971 N.Y. Times 26 Feb. 37/4 One of those taken into custody identified himself as ‘very prominent in the community’ and declared, ‘After this, if the police think they are getting a raise they've got another thing coming.’
1981 J. Sullivan Only Fools & Horses (1999) I. 1st Ser. Episode 1. 57 Del. If you think I'm staying in a lead-lined nissan hut with you and Grandad and a chemical bloody khazi you've got another thing coming.
1998 A. O'Hanlon Talk of Town (1999) I. iv. 60 If you think you're getting into my knickers, you have another thing coming.

Feel a million filaments (Sund4r), Thursday, 9 July 2020 19:09 (five years ago)

As far as I can recall, I have never used this expression in either form, unless referring to the Judas Priest song or talking about which version might be correct.

Feel a million filaments (Sund4r), Thursday, 9 July 2020 19:10 (five years ago)

And I see that I have even posted that years ago! I spend too much time here.

Feel a million filaments (Sund4r), Thursday, 9 July 2020 19:14 (five years ago)

Had never heard of "Another Think Coming" till now.

The Fields o' Fat Henry (Tom D.), Thursday, 9 July 2020 19:18 (five years ago)

https://i.gifer.com/ZDS4.gif

neith moon (ledge), Thursday, 9 July 2020 19:25 (five years ago)

I feel absolutely certain that it is "another think coming," and it causes me great stress seeing people passionately arguing for "thing."

Lily Dale, Thursday, 9 July 2020 22:59 (five years ago)

the inevitable verbally slurring together the two words "think coming" sounds almost identical to the two words "thing coming", so in real time no one speaking this phrase needs to worry which is which. the rub comes when you have to write it down. obviously it began as "think coming", but the conventional mishearing makes just enough sense that it has overtaken the more sensible rendering. nbd.

the unappreciated charisma of cows (Aimless), Saturday, 11 July 2020 04:52 (five years ago)

one year passes...

just now happened on the judas priest song in the wild (spotify) and came here to discover this entire thread is actually abt how great my mum was

(btw it's THINK)

mark s, Thursday, 7 April 2022 11:27 (three years ago)

Great thread!

But I still say ‘Another thing coming’, coz I’d be inclined to use it aggressively rather than as a warning. I’m sure Alan Sugar says ‘thing’

jel--, Thursday, 7 April 2022 12:04 (three years ago)

"Another think coming" is too difficult to say.

Phil McCracken (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 April 2022 12:15 (three years ago)

I agree, I think only someone like Blackadder could pronounce it clearly - but this is possibly the crux of the problem

jel--, Thursday, 7 April 2022 12:21 (three years ago)

I just said it it’s very easy

wins, Thursday, 7 April 2022 12:25 (three years ago)

Not if you actually pronounce the K in think.

Phil McCracken (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 April 2022 12:31 (three years ago)

^because that’s not how you say it

wins, Thursday, 7 April 2022 12:43 (three years ago)

It is when I say it!

Phil McCracken (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 April 2022 12:53 (three years ago)

tbf I've never actually said this phrase before

Phil McCracken (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 April 2022 12:53 (three years ago)

what if you say it all the time but don't know yr saying it

mark s, Thursday, 7 April 2022 13:13 (three years ago)

this inadvertency is actually what the judas priest song is about

mark s, Thursday, 7 April 2022 13:14 (three years ago)

They're breakin' the laws breakin' the laws of grammar.

Phil McCracken (Tom D.), Thursday, 7 April 2022 13:25 (three years ago)

A lot of ppl also don’t know that it’s actually “think cummy Bob”

gop on ya gingrich (wins), Thursday, 7 April 2022 13:46 (three years ago)

thats right

mark s, Thursday, 7 April 2022 13:54 (three years ago)

I don’t want to think about cummy Bob

jel--, Thursday, 7 April 2022 14:03 (three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.