UK Digibox: Classic or Dud

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
For a one-off payment of about 80 pounds, you can have literally thousands of TV channels. But are they any good? IMPORTANT: It costs about the same as a TV licence, but it's more fun.

Next week: alternatives to Council Tax.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 17 April 2003 19:59 (twenty-two years ago)

three weeks pass...
ask N.

he loves it for the digital radio.

RJG (RJG), Monday, 12 May 2003 21:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I just watched a terrific BBC4 dramatisation of a Whitehouse crisis meeting in 2004 to bring back India and Pakistan back from the brink of war.

Good channels on Freeview:

BBC4
BBC3 (for nightly Liquid News, anyway)
BBC News 24 and Sky News
2 run of the mill wall to wall pop video channels
ITV2 for 24 hour I'm A Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here coverage and other things when that finishes
The History Channel (never actually watch this)
All the normal national radio channels in interference-free hifi sound.
BBC6 music radio for repeats of old sessions and concerts.

The other crap:
Some gameshow repeats channel, a Travel channel, and Shopping.


Also handy for speedy digital teletext and quick to view info on what's on now and next.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 12 May 2003 22:24 (twenty-two years ago)

I FORGOT BBC PARLIAMENT.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 08:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I wuv UK History. Although they only seem to have a limited set of programmes so the whole of World history seems to comprise The Vikings, Richard Nixon, WW2 and Adam Hart-Davis.

robster (robster), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 09:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Don't forget you also get FTN which means MOST HAUNTED

j0e (j0e), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 09:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Ftn only ever seems to show Ricki Lake. Plus their garish pink and yellow ident card offends my eyes.

robster (robster), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 09:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Ftn was the one I referred to as the gameshow repeats channel. What the hell is it? I never had it on Telewest cable. It's a very odd name for a station.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 10:10 (twenty-two years ago)

it's a mish-mash of all the stuff on living / bravo / trouble / whatever the other flextech channels are

j0e (j0e), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 13:24 (twenty-two years ago)

i thought ftn stood for "eff the news" is this right? they seem to have thirtysomething on a lot too...

i have real grown up (sky) digital so get all these and several squillion others, but obv this is more expensive...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 13:29 (twenty-two years ago)

The Ftn capitalisation seems very odd. You'd have thought would be ftn, FTN or fTN. Very continental.

From the website:


What is Ftn?
The Ftn Channel is a frank and uncompromising television experience with an eclectic mix of gritty reality, celebrity gossip, full on talk, hard hitting drama and real life fly on the wall documentaries. Pushing the boundaries of entertainment, Ftn features some of the most original and exciting programmes from LivingTV, Bravo,Trouble and Challenge? and broadcasts from 6pm to 6am.

I have not noticed it being frank and uncompromising, but it certainly pushes the boundaries of entertainment.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 13:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Mr Miller, did you get my e-mail?

and yes, buy it, it's good.

chris (chris), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 13:41 (twenty-two years ago)

nine months pass...
I bought a freeview box at argos today, so far so good. The world on BBC 4,e xcellent long form news. Top of the pops in stereo (tv not stereo) and interference free Radio 4. Excellent.

Ed (dali), Friday, 27 February 2004 20:11 (twenty-one years ago)

RJG and AllyC - I have still got that digibox thing if you want to try it...

ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 28 February 2004 01:16 (twenty-one years ago)

No I didn't get your e-mail last year, Chris. Was it important? Update: I am now Telewest Key Stage 1 (or something) man. No BBC4 :-(

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 13:44 (twenty-one years ago)

The coming spanner in the works of free-to-air digital terrestrial telly is Top Up TV, which is a company set up by the chaps who used to run ITV Digital (I think).

They'll be broadcasting E4, Bloomberg, Discovery, UK Gold and a few others on four 24-hour DTTV streams which were previously thought reserved for Freeview stuff. £20 for a decoder card (£10 if you buy online), £8 a month thereafter, no annual contract. Here's the rub - you need a set-top box which accepts a decoder card, i.e. an old OnDigital or ITV Digital contraption. All the people (me included) who've bought the new-style boxes since Freeview was launched in late 2002 are out of luck. Oh, or you can buy an even newer box, which *will* accept a TUTV card, which will be in the shops in the next few months.

In the short term, this means (presumably) lower bitrates for existing Freeview channels on the two multiplexes TUTV have bought space on (channel five for instance - no more near-DVD-quality CSI) and no chance of any more free-to-air channels on those streams. In the long term, who knows?

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 13:55 (twenty-one years ago)

last May? Christ knows, doubt it though.

chris (chris), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 13:59 (twenty-one years ago)

I like to think it was about that football match at Cambridge where you ate all the pies.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 14:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, before anyone jumps on me (as if, on this topic...) I should straighten out my facts. TUTV has space on two multiplexes which aren't part of the Freeview consortium, so they were never gonna be FTA channels. Imminent pixellation of Grissom's stubble not welcomed though.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 14:11 (twenty-one years ago)

it probably was, all the pies were good too.

I may have had three

chris (chris), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 14:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Michael, in case you were wondering, I am vaguely interested.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 14:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I was hoping you were, N.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)

1) Is it possible to connect my analogue cable TV cable to a Digibox and enjoy all the delights listed above, instead of the box Telewest gave me, which only has crap channels? There isn't a 'normal' aerial. Is this a stupid idea?

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 18 March 2004 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)

no, you need digi cable from telewest or an ariel for freeview.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 18 March 2004 19:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I didn't even know analogue cable still existed. Are the channels really crappier than Freeview's?

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 18 March 2004 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)

telewest and NTL have been really slack at upgrading anywhere they consider people too poor to buy extra services.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 18 March 2004 19:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Maidonians are very rich (except me). I was told they would eb going digital by the end of the year, but it was all meaningless to me. It's the lack of BBC 3 and 4 I'm bothered about, N. Otherwise I think it's the same.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 18 March 2004 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)

BBC4 is currently showing a documentary about the man who assassinated the South African P.M. in the 60s. I couldn't understand a word he was saying so switched over to Channel 4 to watch the Curry in Provence ponce. BBC3 is showing Celebdaq, inevitably.

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 18 March 2004 20:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I meantersay, Bid up / Drop Down tv?

It's basically "Old Ladies? Let us Leech off you.. Look Jewellry... mmmmmmm ... !"

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)

and the TERROR in the presenters EYES!!!

"Aaaah !! I'm on the TELLY!! I'm a Salesman!!!! on TELLY !!! HEEllllPPPPP!!!!"

mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:03 (twenty-one years ago)

They are dreadful, but strangely hypnotic, if you're in the right mood. I guess they make most of their money from the premium rate bidding lines.

QVC never seems to sell anything but women's things these days.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Not quite as horrifying as the now-defunct Shop! channel where you could see former CBBC anchor Andy Crane flogging shit with a near-hysterical, hollow-eyed 'god what happened to my career' look on his sad sad face.

robster (robster), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)

NB: Freeview picture quality far better than satellite.

Ed (dali), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)

or at least sky

Ed (dali), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Are you sure about that, Ed? I thought DTTV = far more limited bandwidth?

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)

No, that's FMLB.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Fun, Money and Love Box?

Ricardo (RickyT), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Bought a freeview box at the w/e because a salesman in one shop told me that it worked fine in our area. However his products were expensive & lacked the all important digital out :) so I picked up one on offer in Dixons.

Connected it all up to find that it can't receive any of

BBC1
BBC2
BBC3
ITV1
ITV2
4
BBC News 24
ITC News
Sky News
Sky Sports News
CBBC
UKTV History
Sky Travel
Price-Drop TV (wtf?)

Now I have to see if I can return it. I have a feeling they will try & stick the blame on me for not checking coverage fully first ...

Mooro (Mooro), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Dixons, as noted upthread, offer a 14 day money back guarantee, I think. So you should have no trouble.

So you can get BBC4? That's odd.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:19 (twenty-one years ago)

That means you're only getting Muxes A, B and D (and not 1, 2 or C). Bad news. Sounds like they haven't ramped up transmitter power for those muxes in yr area.

I'd blame N. for encouraging you against Web advice. Good luck getting a refund, DM.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I only said to give it a whirl! I made no promises.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I like my Ftn joke upthread, by the way.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah! Drat dastardly N. & his cavalier attitude to customers at his weekend salesman job!

Mooro (Mooro), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:30 (twenty-one years ago)

It's weird that they sell them in Dixons in an area that can't receive it properly. You'd think they'd warn you when you bought it just to save hassle for themselves. Maybe they keep some commission or something even when it's returned.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I hate everything about Dixons.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:35 (twenty-one years ago)

DTTV uses the DVB standard which uses a bit rate of 8 Mbps Variable nominal.

Sky uses a standard that it created all by itself and uses a bit rate of 4 Mbps Variable nominal.

Ed (dali), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Wow, I didn't know that, Ed. Any Web links I could follow to read up on this stuff? What do you mean by "variable nominal"? 8Mb/s wouldn't be bad for DVD - do yr actual Freeview channels ever get near that in practice? BBC2 and ITV2 often look shockingly poor.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 22 March 2004 18:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think you can get a refund from Dixons. My folks bought my aunt one and they tried it, but it didn't work in her house. When they tried to take it back, they wouldn't let them return it as it had been taken out of the box and used. Like we could have found out another way that it didn't work. Bastards. (this may not have been Dixons, though I think it was).

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 22 March 2004 18:03 (twenty-one years ago)

They must have changed their policy. Sorry Mooro - I feel guilty now.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Or else I am stupid. N. is usually more right than me about stuff, so you could try anyway.

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 22 March 2004 18:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I dispute that, except when it comes to neds.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 18:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I only know what I've picked up through work.

Here's an explanation of how it works (this is how sky works at least DVB is very similar though):

Channels are arranged in bouquet of 8 channels. The 8 channels are supplied to a statistical multiplexer as 270Mbps SDI lines. The multiplexer dynamically assigns bandwidth to the channels, 32Mbits to assign in the case of sky. Each channel has a bandwidth floor and a nominal badwidth. The multiplexer decides where bandwidth should be allocated to get a picture quality of a certain level and dowcodes the SDI to the appropriate bandwidth. So channels with lots of movement get higher bandwidth and other channels get less. Some channels in a bouquet get priority and bouquets are normally organised with a couple of premium channels and a few lower value channels and maybe a data service.

As far as an objective assessment of quality BBC 1 looks better on freeview than it does on sky but the difference is not stark as the BBC not on the main sky satellite and I think they give it higher nominal bandwidth. The difference between bbc1 and one of the less premium channels is starker on sky. There are lots of other factors; the original footage has a lot to do with picture quality, but modern all digital 50 and 270Mbits footage obviously provides the best end product.

Ed (dali), Monday, 22 March 2004 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)

So channels with lots of movement get higher bandwidth

Blimey! How does this work.? I was thinking that there wasn't too much quick moving action on QVC, but have you seen how fast that steam cleaner blasts away grime??

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

FAQ for a CIsco statistical MUX

Ed (dali), Monday, 22 March 2004 19:54 (twenty-one years ago)

The best quality picture I can get is definitely BBC Parliament. I think this is because it's always slight variations on the same picture, thus enabling them to dedicate more bandwidth multiplex SDI clusters to little details, like the reflections glimmering in a backbencher's glass of water. Am I right or wrong?

Mooro, I am sorry to hear about your problems. Although it's on an entirley different technological level, I recently bought a set-top (AKA indoor) aerial on special offer and then took it back to exchange it for a daft 'all-in-one' remote control, which was slightly more expensive. I had the extra three pounds all ready to make up the difference, BUT THEY REFUNDED ME AS IF IT HAD BEEN FULL PRICE, so I was quids in there then. I reckon they might refund you full price, Mooro.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 11:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Freeview box (with its BBC4 & super shiny five - it was nice while it lasted) returned today for full refund. I think the salesman was going to be awkward at first on the grounds that I could get *some* channels, but I did my charcoal grey pinstripe middle class oozing integrity number & it all ended jovially.

Mooro (Mooro), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 15:18 (twenty-one years ago)

"You can get Ftn - what more would you want, sir?"

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)

what the hell is f tn anyway.

Ed (dali), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 15:26 (twenty-one years ago)

The Ftn Channel is a frank and uncompromising television experience with an eclectic mix of gritty reality, celebrity gossip, full on talk, hard hitting drama and real life fly on the wall documentaries. Pushing the boundaries of entertainment, Ftn features some of the most original and exciting programmes from LivingTV, Bravo,Trouble and Challenge? and broadcasts from 6pm to 6am.

(see upthread)

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)

That's what Richard Briers reckons, anyway...

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 15:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Their strap line is 'Full On Entertainment' ...

"Ftn is available on FREEVIEW solely dedicated to general entertainment with a mix of talk, drama, comedy, reality and documentaries. Broadcasting from 6pm to 6am, Ftn features quality original programming from Living TV, Bravo, Trouble and Challenge."

Sounds like the TV equivalent of a tea bag.

Mooro (Mooro), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)

"Ftn - better than a teabag, but substantially worse than teabagging"

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 15:55 (twenty-one years ago)

If you stay up late, Bravo has shagging.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 18:11 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, that's a better slogan.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 18:12 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
I updated the software on my Freeview box, and now I've got all the channels that I can only actually watch if I buy one of the new boxes with a decoder slot and subscribe to Top Up TV. I might consider this if it weren't for E4 being the only one I actually want. I'm not paying £7.99 a month just for that.

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 13:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Intriguingly 'Television X' also appears on the list but there is no mention of this on the Top Up TV website.

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 13:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes there is, this mention:

Top Up TV Channel 60 11pm - 5am

Television X - The Fantasy Channel (Adult Only)

available for a separate monthly fee - terms and conditions apply.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 29 April 2004 13:39 (twenty-one years ago)

I beg your pardon.

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 13:45 (twenty-one years ago)

We've got a brand new non-TUTV station*, Nick - unfortunately, it's another bloody shopping channel, Ideal World (ch22).

(* Do people still say TV station?)

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 29 April 2004 15:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh yes, I saw that. Is that 4 now? This must stop.

N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)

"ooh, these sandals are fantastic! (for 1/2 hour. Not that I waited...)

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 30 April 2004 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)

six months pass...
Arrgh! We bought a shiny new freeview box last night, hooked it up, started searching for channels and found... bugger all. We should be able to receive all the usual free-to-air stuff in our postcode according to the DTG website.

We get pretty good reception through our aerial but the lady at the DTG suggested it needs an upgrade cos it can't receive the digital frequencies - is this likely to be the case? Should we just give up now and beg Argos to take the box back?

robster (robster), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Argos are quite tight nowadays. I am semi-boycotting them, when it suits me.

Will Digiboxes work with a set-top aerial?

I would persevere a bit, all these things are a bastard to get working.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:58 (twenty-one years ago)

> Yes there is, this mention:
> Top Up TV Channel 60 11pm - 5am
> Television X - The Fantasy Channel (Adult Only)

this morning i came into the room with the tv to find the digibox was on channel 60 when i could've sworn i left it on 70 last night before going to bed (to tape 'peel'). the tivo is capable of turning the digibox over but doesn't know about channel 60. poltergeists, obviously.

robster, don't you have 14 days grace with argos? i'd give it another go. try a signal booster.

koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:00 (twenty-one years ago)

don't you have 14 days grace with argos?

In theory, but not always in practice. 'Oh, you've broken the seal!' etc.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I was wondering if a signal booster would do the trick - DTG person didn't think so. Haven't tried the set-top aerial yet but our reception's pretty poor through it usually.

I used to have a digibox that worked fine with a portable aerial so I could give it a go.

robster (robster), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:06 (twenty-one years ago)

'Oh, you've broken the seal!' etc.

You peed on your set top box?

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Was that a bad idea then?

robster (robster), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:16 (twenty-one years ago)

buy the signal booster AND better aerial from argos too, then if it don't work you can take everything back all at once

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:42 (twenty-one years ago)

or just get broadband and digiTV all at once like a responsible internet person should :)

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Don't get me started on broadband...

Actually I would quite like to get started on broadband - we've yet to establish quite what all the holes coming into our living room do.

robster (robster), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:32 (twenty-one years ago)

They are for broadband mice.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:50 (twenty-one years ago)

We get pretty good reception through our aerial but the lady at the DTG suggested it needs an upgrade cos it can't receive the digital frequencies - is this likely to be the case? Should we just give up now and beg Argos to take the box back?

You may need to upgrade your ariel, and the down cable from it. I spend some of last night fixing the 80s vintage ariel cable and we still only got the BBC bouquet. Go for the highest gain ariel you can get (£40 from homebase, Maplin etc.) Get double screened cable and use distrbution amplifiers whereever you split.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:02 (twenty-one years ago)

also.. is sky one on freeview? (otherwise is it worth it?)

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)

no sky one, don't know about top up though

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)

No, sky 1 isn't on freeview, but yes, it is worth it. FOr the sake of £60, you get top-bopmbing terrestrial channels + bbc3 and bbc4, which is a def. plus.

Johnney B (Johnney B), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Top up is shit. It costs about £7 a month or something and all you get that's any good is E4. Also you need one of those new boxes that take decoder cards (or an old OnDigital one, I think).

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I find the Light Programme to be more than sufficient.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I forgot: ITV 3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:40 (twenty-one years ago)

'The ITV News Channel is currently undergoing engineering work on Freeview and will return in February 2005'

What can this possibly mean (when ITV News is still available on other platforms)?

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:41 (twenty-one years ago)

ITV News was still there last night (and was the source of entirely misplaced optimism early on) - I think some transmitters can fit it in and some can't. That sounds like rubbish though, doesn't it?

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 15:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Boots are selling a Digibox for 39.99. It is called Technobox or something. Looks a bit like one of their foot spas or some kind of inflatable pedicure aid.

What is the difference between an expensive Digibox and a cheap Digibox?

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Bugger all really, there are only about three chipsets out there. It comes down to CI slot or no and number of scart sockets.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:45 (twenty-one years ago)

What is a CI slot?

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, but the remotes and user interfaces vary a lot, as far as I can see. Which does make a difference, esp. when you're arsing around with interactive. Doubt it's as simple as 'you get what you pay for' but the speed of flicking through channels also seems to vary.

Maybe consult a WHICH? guide and your local library...?

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, if you've got £150 or so to spend, then consider stretching to one of the digiboxes with internal hard disc recorder. Like a budget Tivo/Sky+! I want one, to automatically store up the good stuff from BBC3 and 4.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:54 (twenty-one years ago)

we might get tivo. i had it once, briefly, in new york. it's probably a plot to rot brains and keep people zombies in their own homes, but my god is it fun.

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)

You are my WHICH? guide. Do you want me to turn into my dad? Besides, I won't be getting one until we can extricate ourselves from evil Tele"Fred"West and their horrible 12 month contract.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:57 (twenty-one years ago)

FTN is cool, though they always seem to have the same documentary about realistic (not very) sex dolls on.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 18:21 (twenty-one years ago)

eleven months pass...
I still don't know what a CI slot is. Why do I want lots of scart sockets? Why are some digiboxes interactive, and some not?

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 20 October 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)

back in the itv digital days you had to subscribe and use a card to verify this. so the boxes hard a smart card slot in them. then freeview came along and you didn't need a card so they stopped making them with card slots. only some of them didn't, just in case...

you probably only need one scart socket. you can get multiple tuners now so you can watch one channel and record another, which probably needs two scart 'out'. having a scart 'in' would allow you to chain your dvd player / video / ps2 through the digibox, which is useful if you have more boxes than your tv has inputs.

koogs (koogs), Thursday, 20 October 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)

You need a CI slot if you want to subscribe to Top Up TV, but you don't, cause it's rubbish.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 20 October 2005 16:57 (twenty years ago)

Thank you both.

Just the interactive question to go. I assume this has something to do with the notorious red button.

I think I like this one, but it's a bit pricey:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0000TEV88/ref=wl_it_dp/026-1079273-2068421?%5Fencoding=UTF8&coliid=IN2ICUPK4RHZR&colid=2B1C4OVP871PI

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 07:38 (twenty years ago)

the steadibot has an identical (or very similar) one.

i haven't heard of non-interactive digiboxes. mine (an old nokia itvdigital box) is dog slow. fuck jenson button and his bbc adverts.

koogs (koogs), Friday, 21 October 2005 07:58 (twenty years ago)

Thank you for listing your favourite programmes, Koogs. I will look out for them.

I think the Steady One is too stressed out to contribute.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:00 (twenty years ago)

my remote semi-broke, and the only solution is to buy another frigging box.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:03 (twenty years ago)

On this model? Cos one of the reviews says it's a big liable to breakages (not the remote though).

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:08 (twenty years ago)

no, my model was the cheapest possible (echostar), it has NO BUTTONS on the actual box.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:10 (twenty years ago)

I don't think my Panasonic has any buttons on the box either.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:12 (twenty years ago)

This is a whole new can of worms.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:15 (twenty years ago)

> my remote semi-broke, and the only solution is to buy another frigging box.

what about a universal remote? might be cheaper. might be an idea to take advantage of argos' no-questions asked returns policy though. (i have a six-in-one but the digibox is the one thing that i don't use it for)

koogs (koogs), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:20 (twenty years ago)

They ask questions now, sadly.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:22 (twenty years ago)

Since I am now incapacitated and therefore anticipate spending a great deal of time home alone over the next few weeks, if anyone could tell me which didgibox to buy I'd be very grateful I'd prefer it if it was cheaper rather than expensiver. Like, I was hoping to pay downwards of £60 rather than lash out the sort of ackers Mr Hoity Toity PJM is thinking about.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:32 (twenty years ago)

You'll get a decent one for about £20 - £30 in Asda Tim.

Rumpie, Friday, 21 October 2005 08:37 (twenty years ago)

I'm sure you will have many people coming to see you, Tim. Note clever avoidance of the obvious word to use there.

I would prefer to pay less too, but I have never heard of Humax or Digifusion and everything cheap I've ever bought has been shit.

There is a Philips one at £60-ish.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000A0D8HM/qid=1129887698/sr=1-30/ref=sr_1_0_30/026-1079273-2068421

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:42 (twenty years ago)

i think they are all 'much of a muchness' -- in what ways are the cheap ones less good? £30 minimum in argos.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:43 (twenty years ago)

When we finally get a Freeview box, it will have a harddrive.

I like the Topfield TF5800PVRt, which lets you record two channels while watching a third, records 90 hours or recordings, and perhaps just as importantly allows you to transfer those recordings over to your PC for archiving.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:51 (twenty years ago)

The Simple Life: Interns is the only thing worth watching really.

jel -- (jel), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:53 (twenty years ago)

According to my limited research, some have a better chance of getting more channels than the others and of working with a crappier aerial. And then there is all the fancy stuff, like programme guides.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:54 (twenty years ago)

mine works pretty well of an inside ariel, the only channels I'm missing are QVC, bid-up, price-drop and channel 5. The channels go funny sometimes, but oh well.

jel -- (jel), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:56 (twenty years ago)

oh, and I can't get the 10 minute preview of Red Hot!

jel -- (jel), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:57 (twenty years ago)

oh, and I can't get the 10 minute preview of Red Hot!
-- jel -- (freeduni...), October 21st, 2005.

yeah me neither.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:58 (twenty years ago)

my £30 echostar does everything i would want. i have a vcr still so don't have arial need to record digitally, since the input isn't great anyway (i live in a valley) i don't see the advantage. also digital channels repeat stuff all the time so i never record stuff in any case.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:59 (twenty years ago)

I understand your HUMAX reservations, but they do seem to be making quite a name for themselves in the Freeview HD recorder box market. I have seen them... recommended.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 21 October 2005 09:03 (twenty years ago)

Yes, HUMAX is not cheap, really. Hm, HD recorder box.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 09:26 (twenty years ago)

Hm indeed.

Anyone have any HD recorder box recommendations, or should I cut out the fannidangle and go for the route one cheapy thirty quid knock it long to the big lad approach? Well?

Tim (Tim), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:22 (twenty years ago)

if you're at home all day, you won't need to record much?

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:30 (twenty years ago)

The latest humax recorder jobby got good writeups. Make sure you have a good analogue signal before you mess with digital though.

Ed (dali), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:32 (twenty years ago)

there's a cool one out there that you just plug into your usb of your computer and that lets your computer be the hard drive recorder...around £60 for PC version, i think? unfortunately, i don't know where toby found it, but a quick search for usb freeview turns up some results that are bigger and clunkier (and cheaper) than the one we were looking at, which looked more like this:
http://www.miglia.com/products/video/tvmini/index.html

colette (a2lette), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:34 (twenty years ago)

also ELgato EyeTV as well, does the same thing.

Ed (dali), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:37 (twenty years ago)

NRQ: I'm at work all day, or at least part of the day, depending on how injured I feel, but my lack of mobility means I will be at home all night most nights, which is unusual.

ED: I only have an indoor ariel but it's a booster and I think it will be OK (friends' experience in similar areas seems to bear this out). The 80gig Humax looks the one for me. Surely any more gigs than 80 is simply self indulgence? 80 seems a lot of gigs.

COLETTE: my pooter is not that clever and the whole upgrade-the-pooter project is something I am trying to ignore at the moment.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:42 (twenty years ago)

Yes, I am stressed. The Sony one upthread is the one I bought in summer 2003. It's great, never a problem with it; well, had some difficulty doing unattended timer-recordings off the radio through the optical-out, but a firmware update fixed that. Please note: I have still never made an unattended timer-recording off the radio through the optical out, but it's comforting to know that I can.

We have it to the side of the telly rather than on top; Ava likes to slap it about; the Sony remote is the one she likes to shove in her mouth too. Both have survived infant manhandling and droolage.

80 gigs? I reckon Carsmile can beat that. In a week.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:46 (twenty years ago)

Droolage is something to bear in mind. Good to hear about the digital "out" too.

How about this one, Captain Pegleg? £10 off.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00076WG8G/qid=1129899254/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_3_1/026-1079273-2068421

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:56 (twenty years ago)

> 80 seems a lot of gigs.

my 40G tivo was only 12 hours on Best quality (although Good (19 hours) was fine and medium was also watchable.). i upgraded two weeks ago to a 200G drive and it now records more than i can sensibly watch (i think there are 3 solid days worth of things i haven't got around to yet) but i don't have to worry about missing anything.

but, yes, 80G probably ok unless you're a square-eyed hermit like myself.

(Arsenic And Old Lace on this afternoon if you're stuck for something to watch btw)

my digibox was, for a long time, used almost exclusively to record Peel into the computer. worked like a treat but the radio 1 feed via freeview isn't the most reliable thing in the world - a decent fm or dab tuner would be better.

koogs (koogs), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:58 (twenty years ago)

I'm more tempted by this, Colonel Gappy:

http://www.humaxdigital.com/uk/products/pvr-8000t.asp

Koogy I don't like the thought of you worrying about missing television programmes, so I am pleased you have a vast pulsating hard drive now.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 21 October 2005 12:08 (twenty years ago)

The 9200T has dual tuners so you can record and watch at the same time.

Ed (dali), Friday, 21 October 2005 12:10 (twenty years ago)

True. And another forty quid.

Ugh, decisions.

Tim (Tim), Friday, 21 October 2005 12:23 (twenty years ago)

Yes, that looks like a snip at £140 quids. But who are Buy Your AV?

What's more Aamazon are kind enough to offer a few compatible leisure tips, I see:

Customers who shopped for this item also shopped for:

100 Naked Girls; Hardcover ~ Petter Hegre
Shaven Angels 2; Hardcover ~ Peter Lorenz
Natural Beauties; Hardcover ~ Eolake Stobblehouse
Stripped Naked; Hardcover ~ Peter Gorman
Sony PlayStation Portable (PSP) Handheld Console Value Pack (Includes Memory Stick, Battery Pack, Headphones, Demo Disc and More); Video Game ~ Sony

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 12:26 (twenty years ago)

Sorry, only £4 off. Worra swizz...

I can't decide. Not that I can afford any of them really.

Meanwhile...

Book Description
Traditionally there have been two kinds of nude art: fine art nudes and erotica. Both have their place in the world, but they are not the only options, not any more. The third kind of nude art, what photographer Stobblehouse calls "simple nudes". This kind of nude art is special in that the primary...

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 13:04 (twenty years ago)

two months pass...
I have got a digibox now. I may plug it in, later on.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Monday, 26 December 2005 17:07 (twenty years ago)

make sure you plug it into your telly and don't do what I did

cozen (Cozen), Monday, 26 December 2005 17:29 (twenty years ago)

Oooh I got the belgian equivalent! We'll probably splash out on some movie subscription as well. I love it.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 26 December 2005 18:45 (twenty years ago)

Pam has a gadget for her (1/4) £2k laptop now that lets her watch freeview on it.

Mooro (Mooro), Monday, 26 December 2005 22:24 (twenty years ago)

what did you do cozen?

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 11:41 (twenty years ago)

What an excellent gadget, Mooro!

I did plug it into my telly. It was easy. My pictures come from Crystal Palace!

Last night I watched Winged Migration. Without even pressing the red button I got extra commentary from my mother-in-law.

I think it is true though, that you get what you pay for. Our remote control is unpleasant and feels as if it has come from a pound shop, and the menu screens could be nicer.

It is Digilogic. Remember the name!

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 13:33 (twenty years ago)

I also watched Dr Who.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 13:38 (twenty years ago)

I have been thinking about getting one of these!

It is confusing, as I am unsure whether my reception is good enough for it anyway. I had imagined that digital TV was a panacea.

Here is another question: is it better to have a DVD / VHS in one box, or as two separate items? More wires the second way.

the snowfox, Wednesday, 28 December 2005 14:23 (twenty years ago)

shop assistants are v v unhelpful re 'will i be able to pick up digital'. they guide you to buy a 'signal booster'. there's just no way of knowing for sure, but you'll probably be alright.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 15:46 (twenty years ago)

Yes, all-in-one is less wires, but as any dad will tell you, there's more to go wrong.

Our "normal" reception is pretty bad (multi-Hansen effect), but the digibox works a treat (one Hansen, but speaking with greater clarity of vision and purpose than ever).

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)

the best thing to do is to buy it from a supermarket - they tend to be cheaper than elsewhere and also will return things v. easily if you are not satisfied for any reason.

as for the DVD Video query, i'm of the opinion that it's almost always better to seperate items. if one bit get's buggered at least you're not losing 2 pieces of technology you need. also they are a bit gimmicky and tend to be impossible to fix.

xp

jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)

Here is another question: is it better to have a DVD / VHS in one box, or as two separate items? More wires the second way.

I've had an LG combined VHS/DVD thingy for 18 months, and I love it - and although it isn't mentioned in the instruction book, it lets you record from dvd to vhs if you want!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 16:29 (twenty years ago)

Our "normal" reception is pretty bad (multi-Hansen effect), but the digibox works a treat (one Hansen, but speaking with greater clarity of vision and purpose than ever).

With analogue ghosting, you might have won 8-0.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

the slushfox:

"YES!

FREEVIEW covers your area for the postcode **** ***.

You should be able to use your existing rooftop aerial and wiring provided they are in good condition but you may need to get them checked to ensure good quality digital reception.

Your local electrical retailer should be able to arrange an aerial survey and aerial upgrade if you need one and advise you of any related charges."

Mooro (Mooro), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 18:17 (twenty years ago)

these are 40 quid in sainsburys now. (also 40 quid (and upwards) in dixons if you can get anyone to serve you). am thinking of getting a new one so i can a: watch bbc4 (ok, bbc3) in the bedroom and b: fit the dvd player under the tv rather than on top of it (the ex-itv-digital box i currently use is too tall to fit both that and the dvd player under my tv)

koogs (koogs), Thursday, 29 December 2005 22:35 (twenty years ago)

Hey Mooro,, is Pam's gadget a good one? I'm in the market for a USB digitaltv box type thing (especially ahead of the World Cup so I can record games that are on while I'm at work)

I've been looking at some of the Hauppage ones but the write-ups on them are very varied.

Porkpie (porkpie), Sunday, 1 January 2006 15:20 (twenty years ago)

I wouls get a 9200T or a 8000T alot less hassle than recording using your laptop ad the 9200T has a USB port for attaching to your computer.


Good info here:

http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=119

Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Sunday, 1 January 2006 16:10 (twenty years ago)

Porkpie (hope you're OK btw, Sally & I have eaten massive you twice over the holiday period plus your gala brother), Pam's gadget is good. I can't really speak for the little aerial that comes with it as we don't live in a proper freeview post code & reception is not good enough for it, but when plugged into the main house aerial its fine. The picture on James' VAIO is superb & he can record & watch it all on the PC.

Mooro (Mooro), Monday, 2 January 2006 12:35 (twenty years ago)

I might still get one!

the bellefox, Monday, 2 January 2006 13:07 (twenty years ago)

Freeview laptop - Does it have a red button, or is ti the Alt+Shift+9 or something?

Yesterday I pressed the red button hoping for all the goalmouth action, but all I got was a load of souped-up Ceefax reports.

PF, go on, take the plunge.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 09:09 (twenty years ago)

Red button: very good around FA Cup weekend cos you get all the goals from all the ties running on a loop in alphabetical order.

I am intrigued to see which way you go on Saturday afternoons, PJM - to BBCi's Score Interactive with Stubbsy or Sky Sports News with Stelling(sy). Or out, to the shops.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 09:31 (twenty years ago)

It's a tough choice. I feel like a Roman emporer, having people watch stuff for me. It's very exciting when someone nearly scores while the cameras are on their watcher. Thing is, I have to be up really close to see the scores on the real time videprinter. I think I prefer Stubbsy, but one can tire of their colour scheme.

Incidentally, I think they must have those laptop gadgets. Or is that just my imagination getting the better of me?

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 09:54 (twenty years ago)

Surely the presence of Crooksy must make the difference, unless Clive Allen also enters the equation somehow?

the pinefox, Tuesday, 3 January 2006 17:22 (twenty years ago)

Oh, Stelling wins every time. I don't know why, except that he is a God amongst pundits, and also you get to laugh at Chris Kamara freezing his arse off in the rafters of a stadium somewhere wondering if he'll ever get to join Le Tiss, Marsh etc in the studio.

ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 22:05 (twenty years ago)

How much electricity does a digibox use?

I ask because I am having difficulty training my family to switch it off when they switch the telly off and I need to get just the right level of psycho dad-ness.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 09:05 (twenty years ago)

Quite a lot, I read. There – is that enough detail?

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 11:07 (twenty years ago)

http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board/showthread.php?t=315617&page=2&pp=25 is only slightly elucidating on the topic.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 11:19 (twenty years ago)

Thank you, Alba. This particular point had never occurred to my BRANE:

One piece of information that has been mentioned which is true is that there is little difference in power consumption etc between the on and standby modes of a Sky box. All standby does is switch off the video output, the box is otherwise completely functional.

Is a Sky box the same as a Freeview box, only with different channels?

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 11:28 (twenty years ago)

Well, there's no moving parts inside the box so I'd presume that power consumption is pretty much the same whether it's on or off.

But then I'm the sort of person who's convinced that all this talk of the oncoming "energy crisis" could be solved by everyone switching off their computers when they leave work at night.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 12:26 (twenty years ago)

Which is why I switch off my computer when I leave work at night. I try to get everyone sle to do the same thing, but I get no joy whatsoever.

Johnny B Was Quizzical (Johnney B), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 12:28 (twenty years ago)

Sky are launching their High Definition TV service later in the year. For HDTVs carrying Sky digital, will this mean that the picture will no longer look so bad (in terms of compression noise, particularly noticeable around footballers when viewed from afar)?

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 12:31 (twenty years ago)

And the power consumptiopn of HDTVs is sky high, I believe...

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 12:45 (twenty years ago)

i think that depends Steve. if they bump up the resolution but don't bump up the bandwidth sufficiently then it'll look just as bad, possibly even worse.

(the tivo has real problems with grass, smoke, fire, tv static and especially water on lower qualities)

koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 12:51 (twenty years ago)

it would certainly be ridiculous to trump up HDTV like that without boosting the bandwidth/decreasing the compression level.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 12:57 (twenty years ago)

Well, there's no moving parts inside the box

There's the Little People inside mine.

I switch my computer off at night and I have recently started going round switching off lights.

Do I really have to wait until March for a choice of two football matches?

grass, smoke, fire, tv static and especially water

I wish to make a poor quality joke out of this.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 13:03 (twenty years ago)

Where's Ed when you need him? Is HDTV H.264 or is it MPEG-4? I can't help thinking the broadcast picture quality will be miles short of HDTV's potential.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 13:35 (twenty years ago)

computer says mpeg-2

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1558,1573979,00.asp

koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 13:58 (twenty years ago)

that said, cable companies who do both the encoding before transmission and the decoding before display are pretty much free to use what they want as long as it comes out of their decoder box looking like something the tv is expecting.

koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 14:02 (twenty years ago)

I do so enjoy the Fred Dibnah Channel.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 13:52 (twenty years ago)

I turn off everything at the plug, including the toaster and the kettle.

Not the fridge.

I can't believe some people don't even turn their computers off.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2006 13:58 (twenty years ago)

I usually leave my computer asleep (=Mac word for "on standby") rather than turn it off, pf, cause then I don't have to wait for it to boot up when I want to use it again.

I read years ago that modern computers have very low power consumption, so don't feel too guilty about leaving it on. Is that correct?

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 14:13 (twenty years ago)

I used to always leave my stereo's amplifier on, cause it was supposed to make it sound better and maybe last longer too. Then I gave up caring.

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 14:15 (twenty years ago)

mine is a laptop, so it's not really using power.

i fear that if i switch off my tv or vcr at the mains, they will forget all their presets. is that insane?

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 14:25 (twenty years ago)

Well - another old story is that it takes more energy to turn things on and off than to leave them on. That could yet be true, too. What do I know?

If that is not true, though, then I think Alba is being rather impatient. Surely you can switch it on and use it a minute later, and save power, rather than leave it on the whole time. But again, what do I know? When I try to put my computer on standby it basically shuts down - it returns to life frozen and unusable, and must be, I think, Reset.

Why a laptop computer is not using power, I don't know. But again - what do I know?

the bellefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2006 14:43 (twenty years ago)

I would like to return to the glory days of switching everything off at the plug. Often I cannot reach comfortably nowadays. I hope MARK OATEN will sort this out for me.

I have erased Community TV and Teachers TV and Bloomberg. Perhaps I am becoming reckless. I am tempted to erase the pop video channels too.

I think the VCR will forget the time if you switch it off at the plug.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 15:03 (twenty years ago)

Even if you switch off at the plug, make sure you leave the plugs in so that the current doesn't leak out!

Mooro (Mooro), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 15:49 (twenty years ago)

Why a laptop computer is not using power, I don't know. But again - what do I know?

i unplug it, it uses battery power while asleep.


Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 15:59 (twenty years ago)

I discovered the first episode of 'The Beiderbecke Affair' on ITV3 or something the other day. Lovely.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 16:07 (twenty years ago)

James Bolam. I watched that, back in the day. I think.

Back in the days when I had an attention span.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 17:43 (twenty years ago)

And the magnificent Barbara Flynn. IMDB reveals she was a hostage in middling Bill Murray vehicle Quick Change! The beginning and end of her Hollywood career.

ITV3 has been superceded in our affections by More4 and ITV4 (all yr ITC/RAI needs).

They're talking about debut hat-tricks on Sky Sports News. I bet they don't mention Tony Cottee OR if they mention Ian St John they neglect to point out that Everton beat Liverpool 4-3 in that match.

Hang on, I have email, they have email...

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 20:42 (twenty years ago)

Did someone else get a debut hat-trick this weekend or has the entire universe fallen for the Scottish-media-led idea that getting a hat-trick against Peterhead (one of which was a penalty) makes Kris Boyd the new Pele? Or are they laughing at him in favour of *proper* debutante hat-tricks?

I have taken to watching National Geographic's rubbish list programmes (Top 10 "when bears fall out of trees onto trampolines", that sort of thing - seriously, the other night I watched a bear fall out of a tree onto a trampoline. It bounced off the trampoline and fell head first onto the ground. Then they followed it with some people who nearly drowned trying to rescue a cow off a cliff. Do you even get National Geographic on Digibox?

I still haven't watched anything on ITV4. Too many channels!

ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 21:13 (twenty years ago)

I used to always leave my stereo's amplifier on, cause it was supposed to make it sound better and maybe last longer too. Then I gave up caring.

An old-fashioned valve amplifier would definitely last longer if it was kept switched on all the time - valves are really just a sophisticated sort of lightbulb, and valve failure nearly always occurs at switch-on.

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 21:25 (twenty years ago)

middling Bill Murray vehicle Quick Change

Middling? Vehicle?

It's a terrific picture!

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2006 21:44 (twenty years ago)

Oh, it tails off quite a bit, doesn't it? I think the first third is terrif, mind. And vehicle only in the sense that Bill was driving it (he co-directed). But can he get it to the airport on time? Ho ho.

I'm now watching a Snow show on one of the normal channels about land ownership. Pam is getting quite angry.

(I shamefully have left my CD player, phono pre-amp, line-level pre-amp, and monoblocs switched on for weeks at a time. The CD player has a class A output stage so it's probably sucking power from the wall like nobody's business 24 hours a day. It's the only concession to audiophile lore I make thesedays. I accept I'm also killing the planet).

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 21:56 (twenty years ago)

(Blimey, look at the serial comma in the first sentence of my last paragraph! It's the S0ft1tl3r virus.)

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 21:57 (twenty years ago)

You are one of those people who knows what a serial comma is. I had never heard of them before that commas thread. And only now do I remember what they are called. I don't think I actually do them, mind.

Seeing as we are picking on your writing, you also made 'thesedays' into one word. Is that a new usage, like Morrissey's 'Everyday' meaning ... 'every day'?

I suppose I can meet you halfway on Quick Change.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2006 22:02 (twenty years ago)

No, it's a shocking error. Or shockingerror. But, as we say in my line of work, it's not a resupply. It's also an excitable crushing together of words in tribute to an REM song I would like to hear right now.

The MOD owns 600,000 acres of land in the UK - cor! The mods own only a few promenades.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 22:17 (twenty years ago)

Oh, yes, *that* song - it's smashing! One of my favourites.

Another parallel is 'Inbetween Days', where I am not sure the first word is quite a proper word.

It is only now that I understand what you meant by 'Snow show'.

The rockers, I suppose, own only a red guitar, three chords and the truth?

the pinefox, Wednesday, 11 January 2006 13:48 (nineteen years ago)

We have got our usb digibox thing for our pc, which is great, but we need to buy another ariel because we can't get BBC3&4, any of the itv's or channel 4, and goodness knows what other lesser known channels. For some reason we get More4+1 and E4+1 but not the normal ones. (we're just using the ariel that came with the box, the TV ariel is at the other end of the house, so a little out of reach)

Vicky (Vicky), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 13:52 (nineteen years ago)

It'll be the arrangement of the channels on each multiplex, Vicky (I think)...

See http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/terrestrial/mux/

If you can't get BBC3 (Mux1), you probably can't get BBC1, BBC2 or News 24 either?

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 16:18 (nineteen years ago)

No, we get BBC 1, 2 and News 24, just not 3&4, bizarre.

Vicky (Vicky), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 16:21 (nineteen years ago)

I had missed whole swathes of this thread.

I call serial commas, "the Oxford Comma". Sounds much posher.

This morning: red button goals galore action from the likes of EVERTON.

In the near future:

Friday 20 January - 1900-2030 GMT, BBC THREE
Group A: Egypt v Libya

Saturday 21 January - 1900-2110 GMT, BBC THREE
Group A: Morocco v Ivory Coast
Group B: Cameroon v Angola
Group B: Togo v DR Congo

Sunday 22 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREE
Group C: Tunisia v Zambia
Group C: South Africa v Guinea

Monday 23 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREE
Group D: Nigeria v Ghana
Group D: Zimbabwe v Senegal

Tuesday 24 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREE
Group A: Libya v Ivory Coast
Group A: Egypt v Morocco

Wednesday 25 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREE
Group B: Angola v DR Congo
Group B: Cameroon v Togo

Thursday 26 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREE
Group C: Zambia v Guinea
Group C: Tunisia v South Africa

Friday 27 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREE
Group D: Ghana v Senegal
Group D: Nigeria v Zimbabwe

Saturday 28 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREE
Group A: Egypt v Ivory Coast
Group A: Libya v Morocco

Sunday 29 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREE
Group B: Angola v Togo
Group B: Cameroon v DR Congo

Monday 30 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREE
Group C: Tunisia v Guinea
Group C: Zambia v South Africa

Tuesday 31 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREE
Group D: Nigeria v Senegal
Group D: Ghana v Zimbabwe

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 19 January 2006 11:09 (nineteen years ago)

The Oxford Comma!

the bellefox, Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:05 (nineteen years ago)

"The Oxford comma is frequently, but in my view unwisely, omitted by many other publishers."

R.W. Burchfield - The New Fowler's Modern English Usage.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 26 January 2006 09:46 (nineteen years ago)

two weeks pass...
So last month:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4614598.stm

"The guy who owns it really should do the lottery because the chances of sending out a signal from a digibox and sending out precisely and exactly on a major emergency channel are far more than 14 million to one."

Today:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/4712122.stm

SO JUST WHAT ARE THE ODDS?

It's ironic that this thread has turned into a bit of an S.O.S. list.

Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 14 February 2006 14:48 (nineteen years ago)

number of dixigoxes / number of sos calls made by same: 1

The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 February 2006 14:51 (nineteen years ago)

I expect Fireman Sam to come round any day now.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 14 February 2006 15:01 (nineteen years ago)

ten months pass...
(This is a repeat, and a boring one at that)

More digibox excitement: the other day I put it on top of the DVD player, and when I tried to play a DVD it wouldn't work, just kept saying "CLOSE" and flickering about. Took DVD back to library as "damaged". Got replacement DVD. Also refused to work. Tried DVD that is personal property and known to work. Would not work. Moved digibox. All was sweetness and light again.
That was a bit longwinded. To sum up:

a) I am a joey.

b) My digibox lacks some kind of "shielding".

c) funny old world.

I want one of those Humax recording things.

I wonder if ITV Digital boxes are collectors' items?

3-way at Argos sounds absolutely delightful. Brings a whole new meaninglessness to "please go to your collection point".

-- PJ Miller (pjmiller6...), January 4th, 2007.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 4 January 2007 08:58 (nineteen years ago)

two weeks pass...
Yet more digibox excitement:

Directly after last night's opening episode of gritty kidnap drama FIVE DAYS, a disembodied voice suggested that I "set [my] recorder" to make sure I managed to catch "all the episodes".

Did anyone else hear this, or was it a subliminal message?

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 11:18 (eighteen years ago)

I bought one! It is also a DVD player, and it has a hard drive too. Every Daily Show this week is going straight into the vault. My building has a rooftop aerial so I plugged it in and VOILA. It's very much like the "free cable" that you get in New York, i.e. if you don't pay for cable but you decide to take the cable that's coming through the wall and plug it into your TV just to see what happens, you get like 30 channels, a few of which are alright and most of which are terrible. The main difference with Freeview, I guess, is that the digital broadcasters in the UK get away with providing a very pixellated picture a lot of the time. It is cool having all the digital radio stations on there, too, though.

It's just my impression, because I don't actually know, but isn't the US pretty far behind when it comes to digital broadcasting in general? Clinton signed a bill that said all transmissions had to be digital by a certain year (I think it was 2007) but Americans have never even heard of digital radio, much less TV.

The other thing that occurs to me is that maybe that's a good thing! Digital television seems like the final nail in the coffin of "the public airwaves", i.e. the idea that no-one can own the magnetic fields of Earth, and no-one can own all the air one must vibrate in order to broadcast radio and television signals. Because governments are "auctioning" the spectrum off. Am I misled in the thought that this is a very different concept from what has heretofore prevailed, i.e. that broadcasters used the frequency spectrum at the public's pleasure?

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:07 (eighteen years ago)

the govt made itself monopoly broadcaster initially! i think the assumption has always been that the state owns the airwaves and it can flog 'em off one by one (as it were) as it sees fit. you *could* identify the government with the public, i *guess*.

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:11 (eighteen years ago)

I need a DVD hard disk recorder but how would I get it to work with my Home Choice box? e.g. would the HD recorder controls be able to change cable channes automatically for programmes (which I know Sky+ does)? it seems unlikely. So I'd only be able to record the current channel.

vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:12 (eighteen years ago)

Tracer the internet is the new public airwaves really.

vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:14 (eighteen years ago)

The pixilation is because:

a) your aerial is crap or badly aligned
b) it is in the shadow of something
c) Signal strength is poor till analogue switchoff occurs (although this is not much of a problem in London, compare to the other two).

Government are auctioning licences rather than selling off spectrum, but it does amount to the same thing. Multiplexing is what is centralising the airwaves. Bouquets of channels need to be broadcast from the same place rather than in a distributed fashion so there are gate keepers other than the government and TV-Channels in the mix.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:19 (eighteen years ago)

It's that identification that allows the state to claim ownership in the first place. The medium being auctioned is the air we all breathe, and the electromagnetic fields we all wade through each day. It seems eminently public, just like oil and coal do. Private companies should surely be compensated, and somtimes handsomely, for facilitating the exploitation of these common resources, but no one in particular owns them. And when no one in particular, by logic and justice, owns an immensely valuable resource, it surely belongs to the state. What I question is the state's right to then turn around and sell what has accrued to it from public generosity. It's like Bruce Ratner in Brooklyn, getting the city to claim imminent domain on blocks of housing, knocking them down to build a stadium for the New Jersey Nets, accepting millions from the city coffers to do it, and then (mark my words) selling the team to someone else for a tidy profit three years later (max).

I also worry that because digital broadcasting has been taken up in a climate where the spectrum has been auctioned, rather than... what, borrowed? - then there will bo no obligation whatsoever to provide public service programming, i.e. educational programming, programing for kids, etc. And government requirements, both in the US and the UK, for broadcasters to permanently switch off their analogue transmitters forever, seem like a government enforcement of this privatization (not to mention an enforcement to buy expensive new kit).

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:23 (eighteen years ago)

Ed I think in the US the spectrum was actually sold. I need to reesearch that, though, because I'm not sure.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:25 (eighteen years ago)

More fool them then, we get to auction the same spectrum again when the next boondoggle comes along.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:27 (eighteen years ago)

i don't get yr consitutional theory, tracer. or i 'get' it but i don't think it scans: what 'allows' the state to do anything is a series of concessions to (as of the 1920s anyway, when these decisions were made) various sectors of the population, viz, the vote. but only very few pols would have said that that means the public can be identified with the state.

indeed the bbc was explicitly made into a govt propaganda outlet during the general strike, and then during ww2.

there was a huge row re. coal mines being under private property. iirc the landowners got paid.

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:30 (eighteen years ago)

I keep forgetting you guys have a Queen.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:34 (eighteen years ago)

it's not even about that: it's just that the authority of parliament isn't so explicitly related to representing "the public" as it might be. it hasn't fundamentally been changed by extending the franchise.

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:36 (eighteen years ago)

It is exactly about that. Government still derives it's power from the monarchy, even if the monarchy has ceded that power to whoever wins a popularity contest every 5 years.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:38 (eighteen years ago)

That is not entirely true, parliament does not derive it's power to legislate on revenue matters from the Monarch.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:41 (eighteen years ago)

The Act of Settlement basically means that parliament runs the country on a franchise basis from the monarch in return for a bundle of money.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:44 (eighteen years ago)

1688 did sort of put the monarch out of play, but even still parliament is not beholden to 'the public' other than by the vote.

the biggest constitutional upheaval since 1688 (1910-14) ended in a weird kind of stalemate (in which the authority of parliament had to be maintained *against* the public (women, unions).

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:48 (eighteen years ago)

The pixilation is because:
a) your aerial is crap or badly aligned
b) it is in the shadow of something
c) Signal strength is poor till analogue switchoff occurs (although this is not much of a problem in London, compare to the other two).

Does reception affect things like bitrate? I didn't know it worked like that - I thought you either got the picture quality as broadcast or you got break-up. I thought what Tracer was complaining about was things like 1980s drama serials on ITV2 looking like they've been converted on someone's laptop in ten minutes by some freeware.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:55 (eighteen years ago)

that sounds right. my signal is loud and clear and the good stuff looks good; but other stuff looks crummy and compressed.

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:57 (eighteen years ago)

Bitrate is different. The less premium channels run at lower bitrates and are prone to artefacting.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:59 (eighteen years ago)

Are you sure you're not thinking of 1980s drama serials like the ones on ITV 2 on your laptop, Michael?


I get more drop-outs on less premium AKA shit channels. Is that for the same reason, or am I doolally?

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:18 (eighteen years ago)

Michael that is EXACTLY what it looks like! Whether that is indeed the cause of the awfulness of it (a great example here is Battle Royale, shown the other night on... can't remember, which I was excited to finally see, only to find that everything BLACK had become BLUE and everything else had become GREY and when anyone swung a fist, the whole image seemed to shudder) or if it's the bitrate thing I don't know. I assumed it was the latter, and not because of reception, but because my understanding has been that broadcasters have had the choice to use all their "bits" (hur hur) to output, say, one pristine channel, or to output four channels of squidged-down compressed crap that they can still sell ads for.

Have had no drop-outs so far, except when I thought the sound was out on Big Brother, having not realized that's just the way the show is.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:20 (eighteen years ago)

Some multiplexes are better than others but this has nothing to do with bitrate. The BBC has the best multiplexes, of course.

That is artefacting and has to do with the channel purchasing a paltry amount of bitrate.

Which channel was it?

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:22 (eighteen years ago)

> like 1980s drama serials on ITV2 looking like they've been converted on someone's laptop in ten minutes by some freeware.

ha, i spent last night doing exactly that. (although was bbc2 comedy from 1995)(and it was taking about 14 minutes per half hour)

> Bitrate is different. The less premium channels run at lower bitrates and are prone to artefacting.

this is what i thought tracer meant upthread - artefacting / pixelation.

oddly the worst picture i've seen is on csi on five via analogue - facial shadows were a lot darker than they should've been - like they'd been digitised on a 16 colour amiga or something. without dithering.

My Koogy Weighs A Ton (koogs), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:24 (eighteen years ago)

only to find that everything BLACK had become BLUE and everything else had become GREY and when anyone swung a fist

sounds like a dodgy scart connection to me.

Johnney B English (stigoftdump), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:30 (eighteen years ago)

Perhaps we're at cross-purposes; when Tracer says "pixellation" (blockiness, motion judder, low-res feel) he means what Ed means when he says "artefacts". When Ed says "pixellation" he means when I mean when I say "break up".

TV was better at 405 lines. There must be a sloganed T-shirt I can get to that effect.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:32 (eighteen years ago)

what I mean, obv

(Give me a break - 3 hours of sleep a night for the last six nights!)

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:32 (eighteen years ago)

I think I'd like a TiVo. Where can I get one? And can I eat it when I get bored?

xpost - pixellisationing up is so hard to do.

Bhumibol Adulyadej (Lucretia My Reflection), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:34 (eighteen years ago)

(Yeah, does Ed even know I've dumped him?)

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:35 (eighteen years ago)

> I think I'd like a TiVo. Where can I get one?

ebay. they stopped making new ones about two years after they started (which is a pity because it's a great bit of kit). other (inferior) boxes that do the same thing (after a fashion) are available... the humax seems popular.

(the one thing that does bug me with the tivo is the american use of channel numbers. bbc is 21 for instance. which is fine and you get used to it quite quickly because the names are there next to the numbers. but then the digital channels come along and are also numbered in the same range as the terrestrial channels so instead of bbc1, itv1, bbc2 etc being adjacent they are now interleaved with filum4 and fiveUS and the like. fiddly.)

My Koogy Weighs A Ton (koogs), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)

I keep forgetting you guys have a Queen.

and they're finally giving her an Oscar after decades of neglect.

vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:51 (eighteen years ago)

Yes - I thought they stopped making them - but then you said upthread you upgraded yours, and I thought - gosh! Perhaps they started again. I will look into humax perhaps. Don't really like the name though. HOOOMAX.

Bhumibol Adulyadej (Lucretia My Reflection), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:51 (eighteen years ago)

human, to the max!

vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:53 (eighteen years ago)

for channels with crappy bitrate allowance is the artefact issue particularly garish during ad breaks when they crank the volume up so much? (this is still the worst thing about modern TV)

vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:55 (eighteen years ago)

Ad volume = brick-wall compression, done in post-prod by the ad companies, I imagine. Broadcasters could just drop ad breaks by 8-10dB across the board to compensate but I bet they're not allowed to. Ed?

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:06 (eighteen years ago)

> but then you said upthread you upgraded yours

just shoved a hoooge disk in it because 40 hours wasn't enough. it's open enough so that you can do that. i think later models and all the imposters are locked down tightly so you have to go the official upgrade route. or don't bother.

all the major manufacturers do them now, the sony thing won awards in christmas "What Hifi (And Surround Sound System And Half A Dozen Other Categories)" thing. can get them with dvd burners and hard disks and stuff but they tend to be expensive (tivo was £400 when i bought, £200 a year later, £99 for one weekend in some obscure chain about a year after that that was getting rid of theirs)(that said, first nicam video recorder i bought was £399 so...).

i wouldn't've thought volume would affect bitrate. besides, audio bitrate and video bitrate tend to be independant. the compression trick is the reason mute buttons were invented. if they try and grab my attention that way they get muted out. see also: flashing banner ads and adblock

My Koogy Weighs A Ton (koogs), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:36 (eighteen years ago)

That is audio compression rather than compressing audio and has nothing to do with video leagalising (the equivalent to audio compression but not to compressing audio)

Audio compression: when audio signal peaks are brought below a certain level to prevent clipping in the audio signal when it is digitised or otherwise transmitted. This is usually accompanied by some gain normalisation to make sure that the sound power level is brought back up to what it was before compression. Heavy compression and normalisation is what makes the adverts sound louder

Compressing the audio: Using a codec, (AC3 and MP2 are the most common for TV) to reduce the bitrate of the audio signal.

Video Legalising, brinigin the video signal to within the parameters of the tranmission system, i.e. making sure that the Luminance, Chrominance and Variage of the signal all fall within specified limits, in a modern all digital workflow this is normally done at the editing stage.

Video Compression: Using a codec (MPEG-2) to reduce the bitrate of the video signal.

Artefacting: blockyness, blotchiness brought on by over compression of the video signal or inexpertly applied compression. In general older poorer video sources compress poorly and show more digital artefacts because they don't have the sharp focus and bright tones footage of modern digital material and because of existing analogue artefacts You can also get artefact with high motion video at low bitrates.

Blocking or Pixilation: If the MPEG-2 transport stream is interrupted then data integrity will break down. The picture is encode by block of pixels, if it can maintain the picture by holding a block for a few frames then the system will try to do this in an effort to keep something on screen whilst this system tries to recapture the stream. this causes squares on the screen to appear to freeze, go black or change to unexpected colours.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)

This last one happens on my digibox from time to time. It ain't no thang.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)

Last night's subliminal message to me and me alone:

"Don't forget to set your *digital* recorder so that you catch every episode."

I half expect them to say "don't forget to set your Humax PVR 500..." tonight.


Sometimes the picture goes away but the subtitles stay. What's all that about?

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 25 January 2007 12:22 (eighteen years ago)

Subtitles are normally on a different PID on the Bouquet, and require low bandwidth so are less susceptible to break-up.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 25 January 2007 12:24 (eighteen years ago)

Nice glossary, Ed! (You can see why some people might call digital artefacts "pixellation", even though it's not strictly correct).

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 25 January 2007 12:31 (eighteen years ago)

Absolutely.

Ed (dali), Thursday, 25 January 2007 12:32 (eighteen years ago)

it's always particularly bad during the title credits to celebrity big brother arf

vita susicivus (blueski), Thursday, 25 January 2007 12:43 (eighteen years ago)

i guess i meant 'titles/credits'

vita susicivus (blueski), Thursday, 25 January 2007 12:46 (eighteen years ago)

> Battle Royale, shown the other night on... can't remember, which I was excited to finally see

part 2 (universally judged inferior i think) is on film4 on saturday:

http://www.channel4.com/film/reviews/film.jsp?id=132014

in related news (kinda), ftn is showing Takeshi's Castle starting in a week or two. first time on freeview.

Koogy Bloogies (koogs), Thursday, 25 January 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)

Battle Royale 2 is complete rubbish. Inferior isn't a strong enough word. It's the inferioriest sequel ever.

ailsa (ailsa), Thursday, 25 January 2007 17:55 (eighteen years ago)

No mention of digital recorders last night.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 26 January 2007 09:50 (eighteen years ago)

i was watching the war film 'the train' last night, or bits of it, on film4 + 1. blocky as fuck. i wonder if +1 is blockier than the actual filmfour.

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Friday, 26 January 2007 09:57 (eighteen years ago)

Filmfour has a crystal clear picture usually. Maybe the source of Battle Royale was just crap. Last night I watched "Stuck on You" and it looked perfect. I almost cried when they were on the operating table. I am such a ninny.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Friday, 26 January 2007 11:46 (eighteen years ago)

i guess 'the train' could well have a shitty source. i switched over and indeed 'stuck on you' looked pin-sharp. it would be funny if +1 were lower quality tho.

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Friday, 26 January 2007 11:51 (eighteen years ago)

it would be funny if +1 were lower quality tho

Yeah, cos it's supposed to be one better, innit? That's the point.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 26 January 2007 11:57 (eighteen years ago)

two weeks pass...
MORE4 – 10 Feb 2007


15:35 Relocation, Relocation
16:40 Relocation, Relocation
17:45 Relocation, Relocation
18:50 Snowmail
18:55 Relocation, Relocation
20:00 Relocation, Relocation
21:00 Inside Waco
23:05 GBH
00:40 Relocation, Relocation

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 10 February 2007 19:47 (eighteen years ago)

So it's pretty much the same as channel 4, then.

g00blar (gooblar), Saturday, 10 February 2007 20:47 (eighteen years ago)

I have just done a search for the Liverpool Everton thread, but ended up here instead.

So...

I take back what I said about Life on Mars being rubbish. I enjoyed epsiode 2 very much, and although I didn't enjoy episode 3 as much, I think it might be just a question of overdoing it. I am looking forward to the one about wife-swapping parties.

My cheapo digibox's perfromance gets worse and worse. I often switch over to "normal" telly now. I take great comfort in this act of rebellion, but it is not that convenient really.

PJ Miller, Thursday, 22 February 2007 13:17 (eighteen years ago)

Maybe it's a seasonal reception thing - all our ITV channels are blocking and breaking up something chronic thesedays.

Michael Jones, Thursday, 22 February 2007 16:55 (eighteen years ago)

The damp/rain can play merry hell with any connector or junction boxes you have on the line from your aerial and the damp air isn't great for radio propagation either. It's been wet recently.

Ed, Thursday, 22 February 2007 16:57 (eighteen years ago)

I was worrying that maybe the strong winds in January had loosened something up there and I was going to have to emulate Rod Hull and get a big ladder to fix it. But the junction box is a good one - it's just to the left of our living room window so perhaps I can put a little mac on it.

Michael Jones, Thursday, 22 February 2007 19:55 (eighteen years ago)

junction box theory is a good one, I meant to say

Michael Jones, Thursday, 22 February 2007 19:56 (eighteen years ago)

second week running the tivo has turned over to record a (unwanted) second showing of Screen Burn and then try and turn over for Millennium on itv4 an hour or so later only for the poxy set top box to stick on bbc4. on the recording i can see the '28' appear on screen but the box just sticks on '9'. argh.

koogs, Friday, 23 February 2007 08:50 (eighteen years ago)

That is terrible news, Andy. May I suggest a HUMAX dual-core model?

I'm not sure we even have a junction box, but the aerial is pretty crap. Previous resident was a Sky person.

Am I right in thinking a new aerial would be in the region of a hundred nicker?

I think I might have asked this question before, so here is an additional one:

And could we take it with us when we move? Assuming we eventually do. Would this involve Rod Hullism?

I wonder if Rod Hull lived in the Thames Valley. Seems likely, after all, it is the light entertainment capital of the world.

PJ Miller, Friday, 23 February 2007 09:30 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.