Next week: alternatives to Council Tax.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 17 April 2003 19:59 (twenty-two years ago)
he loves it for the digital radio.
― RJG (RJG), Monday, 12 May 2003 21:47 (twenty-two years ago)
Good channels on Freeview:
BBC4BBC3 (for nightly Liquid News, anyway)BBC News 24 and Sky News2 run of the mill wall to wall pop video channelsITV2 for 24 hour I'm A Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here coverage and other things when that finishesThe History Channel (never actually watch this)All the normal national radio channels in interference-free hifi sound. BBC6 music radio for repeats of old sessions and concerts.
The other crap:Some gameshow repeats channel, a Travel channel, and Shopping.
Also handy for speedy digital teletext and quick to view info on what's on now and next.
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 12 May 2003 22:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 08:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― robster (robster), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 09:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― j0e (j0e), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 09:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― robster (robster), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 09:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 10:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― j0e (j0e), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 13:24 (twenty-two years ago)
i have real grown up (sky) digital so get all these and several squillion others, but obv this is more expensive...
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 13:29 (twenty-two years ago)
From the website:
What is Ftn? The Ftn Channel is a frank and uncompromising television experience with an eclectic mix of gritty reality, celebrity gossip, full on talk, hard hitting drama and real life fly on the wall documentaries. Pushing the boundaries of entertainment, Ftn features some of the most original and exciting programmes from LivingTV, Bravo,Trouble and Challenge? and broadcasts from 6pm to 6am.
I have not noticed it being frank and uncompromising, but it certainly pushes the boundaries of entertainment.
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 13:39 (twenty-two years ago)
and yes, buy it, it's good.
― chris (chris), Wednesday, 14 May 2003 13:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ed (dali), Friday, 27 February 2004 20:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Saturday, 28 February 2004 01:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 13:44 (twenty-one years ago)
They'll be broadcasting E4, Bloomberg, Discovery, UK Gold and a few others on four 24-hour DTTV streams which were previously thought reserved for Freeview stuff. £20 for a decoder card (£10 if you buy online), £8 a month thereafter, no annual contract. Here's the rub - you need a set-top box which accepts a decoder card, i.e. an old OnDigital or ITV Digital contraption. All the people (me included) who've bought the new-style boxes since Freeview was launched in late 2002 are out of luck. Oh, or you can buy an even newer box, which *will* accept a TUTV card, which will be in the shops in the next few months.
In the short term, this means (presumably) lower bitrates for existing Freeview channels on the two multiplexes TUTV have bought space on (channel five for instance - no more near-DVD-quality CSI) and no chance of any more free-to-air channels on those streams. In the long term, who knows?
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 13:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― chris (chris), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 13:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 14:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 14:11 (twenty-one years ago)
I may have had three
― chris (chris), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 14:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 14:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 10 March 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 18 March 2004 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ed (dali), Thursday, 18 March 2004 19:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 18 March 2004 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ed (dali), Thursday, 18 March 2004 19:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 18 March 2004 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 18 March 2004 20:56 (twenty-one years ago)
It's basically "Old Ladies? Let us Leech off you.. Look Jewellry... mmmmmmm ... !"
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)
"Aaaah !! I'm on the TELLY!! I'm a Salesman!!!! on TELLY !!! HEEllllPPPPP!!!!"
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:03 (twenty-one years ago)
QVC never seems to sell anything but women's things these days.
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― robster (robster), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ed (dali), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ed (dali), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)
Connected it all up to find that it can't receive any of
BBC1BBC2BBC3ITV1ITV24BBC News 24ITC NewsSky NewsSky Sports NewsCBBCUKTV HistorySky TravelPrice-Drop TV (wtf?)
Now I have to see if I can return it. I have a feeling they will try & stick the blame on me for not checking coverage fully first ...
― Mooro (Mooro), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)
So you can get BBC4? That's odd.
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:19 (twenty-one years ago)
I'd blame N. for encouraging you against Web advice. Good luck getting a refund, DM.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mooro (Mooro), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:35 (twenty-one years ago)
Sky uses a standard that it created all by itself and uses a bit rate of 4 Mbps Variable nominal.
― Ed (dali), Monday, 22 March 2004 17:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 22 March 2004 18:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 22 March 2004 18:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 22 March 2004 18:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 18:18 (twenty-one years ago)
Here's an explanation of how it works (this is how sky works at least DVB is very similar though):
Channels are arranged in bouquet of 8 channels. The 8 channels are supplied to a statistical multiplexer as 270Mbps SDI lines. The multiplexer dynamically assigns bandwidth to the channels, 32Mbits to assign in the case of sky. Each channel has a bandwidth floor and a nominal badwidth. The multiplexer decides where bandwidth should be allocated to get a picture quality of a certain level and dowcodes the SDI to the appropriate bandwidth. So channels with lots of movement get higher bandwidth and other channels get less. Some channels in a bouquet get priority and bouquets are normally organised with a couple of premium channels and a few lower value channels and maybe a data service.
As far as an objective assessment of quality BBC 1 looks better on freeview than it does on sky but the difference is not stark as the BBC not on the main sky satellite and I think they give it higher nominal bandwidth. The difference between bbc1 and one of the less premium channels is starker on sky. There are lots of other factors; the original footage has a lot to do with picture quality, but modern all digital 50 and 270Mbits footage obviously provides the best end product.
― Ed (dali), Monday, 22 March 2004 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)
Blimey! How does this work.? I was thinking that there wasn't too much quick moving action on QVC, but have you seen how fast that steam cleaner blasts away grime??
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 22 March 2004 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ed (dali), Monday, 22 March 2004 19:54 (twenty-one years ago)
Mooro, I am sorry to hear about your problems. Although it's on an entirley different technological level, I recently bought a set-top (AKA indoor) aerial on special offer and then took it back to exchange it for a daft 'all-in-one' remote control, which was slightly more expensive. I had the extra three pounds all ready to make up the difference, BUT THEY REFUNDED ME AS IF IT HAD BEEN FULL PRICE, so I was quids in there then. I reckon they might refund you full price, Mooro.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 11:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Mooro (Mooro), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 15:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ed (dali), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 15:26 (twenty-one years ago)
(see upthread)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 15:36 (twenty-one years ago)
"Ftn is available on FREEVIEW solely dedicated to general entertainment with a mix of talk, drama, comedy, reality and documentaries. Broadcasting from 6pm to 6am, Ftn features quality original programming from Living TV, Bravo, Trouble and Challenge."
Sounds like the TV equivalent of a tea bag.
― Mooro (Mooro), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 15:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 18:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 23 March 2004 18:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 13:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 13:33 (twenty-one years ago)
Top Up TV Channel 60 11pm - 5am Television X - The Fantasy Channel (Adult Only)
available for a separate monthly fee - terms and conditions apply.
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 29 April 2004 13:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 13:45 (twenty-one years ago)
(* Do people still say TV station?)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 29 April 2004 15:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 29 April 2004 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 30 April 2004 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)
We get pretty good reception through our aerial but the lady at the DTG suggested it needs an upgrade cos it can't receive the digital frequencies - is this likely to be the case? Should we just give up now and beg Argos to take the box back?
― robster (robster), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:35 (twenty-one years ago)
Will Digiboxes work with a set-top aerial?
I would persevere a bit, all these things are a bastard to get working.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 10:58 (twenty-one years ago)
this morning i came into the room with the tv to find the digibox was on channel 60 when i could've sworn i left it on 70 last night before going to bed (to tape 'peel'). the tivo is capable of turning the digibox over but doesn't know about channel 60. poltergeists, obviously.
robster, don't you have 14 days grace with argos? i'd give it another go. try a signal booster.
― koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:00 (twenty-one years ago)
In theory, but not always in practice. 'Oh, you've broken the seal!' etc.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:03 (twenty-one years ago)
I used to have a digibox that worked fine with a portable aerial so I could give it a go.
― robster (robster), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:06 (twenty-one years ago)
You peed on your set top box?
― Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― robster (robster), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 11:43 (twenty-one years ago)
Actually I would quite like to get started on broadband - we've yet to establish quite what all the holes coming into our living room do.
― robster (robster), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:50 (twenty-one years ago)
You may need to upgrade your ariel, and the down cable from it. I spend some of last night fixing the 80s vintage ariel cable and we still only got the BBC bouquet. Go for the highest gain ariel you can get (£40 from homebase, Maplin etc.) Get double screened cable and use distrbution amplifiers whereever you split.
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Johnney B (Johnney B), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:40 (twenty-one years ago)
What can this possibly mean (when ITV News is still available on other platforms)?
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 13:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 15:12 (twenty-one years ago)
What is the difference between an expensive Digibox and a cheap Digibox?
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)
Maybe consult a WHICH? guide and your local library...?
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 17:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 3 November 2004 18:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 20 October 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)
you probably only need one scart socket. you can get multiple tuners now so you can watch one channel and record another, which probably needs two scart 'out'. having a scart 'in' would allow you to chain your dvd player / video / ps2 through the digibox, which is useful if you have more boxes than your tv has inputs.
― koogs (koogs), Thursday, 20 October 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Thursday, 20 October 2005 16:57 (twenty years ago)
Just the interactive question to go. I assume this has something to do with the notorious red button.
I think I like this one, but it's a bit pricey:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0000TEV88/ref=wl_it_dp/026-1079273-2068421?%5Fencoding=UTF8&coliid=IN2ICUPK4RHZR&colid=2B1C4OVP871PI
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 07:38 (twenty years ago)
i haven't heard of non-interactive digiboxes. mine (an old nokia itvdigital box) is dog slow. fuck jenson button and his bbc adverts.
― koogs (koogs), Friday, 21 October 2005 07:58 (twenty years ago)
I think the Steady One is too stressed out to contribute.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:00 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:03 (twenty years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:08 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:10 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:12 (twenty years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:15 (twenty years ago)
what about a universal remote? might be cheaper. might be an idea to take advantage of argos' no-questions asked returns policy though. (i have a six-in-one but the digibox is the one thing that i don't use it for)
― koogs (koogs), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:20 (twenty years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:22 (twenty years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:32 (twenty years ago)
― Rumpie, Friday, 21 October 2005 08:37 (twenty years ago)
I would prefer to pay less too, but I have never heard of Humax or Digifusion and everything cheap I've ever bought has been shit.
There is a Philips one at £60-ish.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000A0D8HM/qid=1129887698/sr=1-30/ref=sr_1_0_30/026-1079273-2068421
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:42 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:43 (twenty years ago)
I like the Topfield TF5800PVRt, which lets you record two channels while watching a third, records 90 hours or recordings, and perhaps just as importantly allows you to transfer those recordings over to your PC for archiving.
― Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:51 (twenty years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:53 (twenty years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:54 (twenty years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:56 (twenty years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:57 (twenty years ago)
yeah me neither.
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:58 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 21 October 2005 08:59 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Friday, 21 October 2005 09:03 (twenty years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 09:26 (twenty years ago)
Anyone have any HD recorder box recommendations, or should I cut out the fannidangle and go for the route one cheapy thirty quid knock it long to the big lad approach? Well?
― Tim (Tim), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:22 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:30 (twenty years ago)
― Ed (dali), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:32 (twenty years ago)
― colette (a2lette), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:34 (twenty years ago)
― Ed (dali), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:37 (twenty years ago)
ED: I only have an indoor ariel but it's a booster and I think it will be OK (friends' experience in similar areas seems to bear this out). The 80gig Humax looks the one for me. Surely any more gigs than 80 is simply self indulgence? 80 seems a lot of gigs.
COLETTE: my pooter is not that clever and the whole upgrade-the-pooter project is something I am trying to ignore at the moment.
― Tim (Tim), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:42 (twenty years ago)
We have it to the side of the telly rather than on top; Ava likes to slap it about; the Sony remote is the one she likes to shove in her mouth too. Both have survived infant manhandling and droolage.
80 gigs? I reckon Carsmile can beat that. In a week.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:46 (twenty years ago)
How about this one, Captain Pegleg? £10 off.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00076WG8G/qid=1129899254/sr=2-1/ref=sr_2_3_1/026-1079273-2068421
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:56 (twenty years ago)
my 40G tivo was only 12 hours on Best quality (although Good (19 hours) was fine and medium was also watchable.). i upgraded two weeks ago to a 200G drive and it now records more than i can sensibly watch (i think there are 3 solid days worth of things i haven't got around to yet) but i don't have to worry about missing anything.
but, yes, 80G probably ok unless you're a square-eyed hermit like myself.
(Arsenic And Old Lace on this afternoon if you're stuck for something to watch btw)
my digibox was, for a long time, used almost exclusively to record Peel into the computer. worked like a treat but the radio 1 feed via freeview isn't the most reliable thing in the world - a decent fm or dab tuner would be better.
― koogs (koogs), Friday, 21 October 2005 11:58 (twenty years ago)
http://www.humaxdigital.com/uk/products/pvr-8000t.asp
Koogy I don't like the thought of you worrying about missing television programmes, so I am pleased you have a vast pulsating hard drive now.
― Tim (Tim), Friday, 21 October 2005 12:08 (twenty years ago)
― Ed (dali), Friday, 21 October 2005 12:10 (twenty years ago)
Ugh, decisions.
― Tim (Tim), Friday, 21 October 2005 12:23 (twenty years ago)
What's more Aamazon are kind enough to offer a few compatible leisure tips, I see:
Customers who shopped for this item also shopped for:
100 Naked Girls; Hardcover ~ Petter Hegre Shaven Angels 2; Hardcover ~ Peter Lorenz Natural Beauties; Hardcover ~ Eolake Stobblehouse Stripped Naked; Hardcover ~ Peter Gorman Sony PlayStation Portable (PSP) Handheld Console Value Pack (Includes Memory Stick, Battery Pack, Headphones, Demo Disc and More); Video Game ~ Sony
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 12:26 (twenty years ago)
I can't decide. Not that I can afford any of them really.
Meanwhile...
Book Description Traditionally there have been two kinds of nude art: fine art nudes and erotica. Both have their place in the world, but they are not the only options, not any more. The third kind of nude art, what photographer Stobblehouse calls "simple nudes". This kind of nude art is special in that the primary...
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 21 October 2005 13:04 (twenty years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Monday, 26 December 2005 17:07 (twenty years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Monday, 26 December 2005 17:29 (twenty years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 26 December 2005 18:45 (twenty years ago)
― Mooro (Mooro), Monday, 26 December 2005 22:24 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 11:41 (twenty years ago)
I did plug it into my telly. It was easy. My pictures come from Crystal Palace!
Last night I watched Winged Migration. Without even pressing the red button I got extra commentary from my mother-in-law.
I think it is true though, that you get what you pay for. Our remote control is unpleasant and feels as if it has come from a pound shop, and the menu screens could be nicer.
It is Digilogic. Remember the name!
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 13:33 (twenty years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 13:38 (twenty years ago)
It is confusing, as I am unsure whether my reception is good enough for it anyway. I had imagined that digital TV was a panacea.
Here is another question: is it better to have a DVD / VHS in one box, or as two separate items? More wires the second way.
― the snowfox, Wednesday, 28 December 2005 14:23 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 15:46 (twenty years ago)
Our "normal" reception is pretty bad (multi-Hansen effect), but the digibox works a treat (one Hansen, but speaking with greater clarity of vision and purpose than ever).
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)
as for the DVD Video query, i'm of the opinion that it's almost always better to seperate items. if one bit get's buggered at least you're not losing 2 pieces of technology you need. also they are a bit gimmicky and tend to be impossible to fix.
xp
― jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)
I've had an LG combined VHS/DVD thingy for 18 months, and I love it - and although it isn't mentioned in the instruction book, it lets you record from dvd to vhs if you want!
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 16:29 (twenty years ago)
With analogue ghosting, you might have won 8-0.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)
"YES!
FREEVIEW covers your area for the postcode **** ***.
You should be able to use your existing rooftop aerial and wiring provided they are in good condition but you may need to get them checked to ensure good quality digital reception.
Your local electrical retailer should be able to arrange an aerial survey and aerial upgrade if you need one and advise you of any related charges."
― Mooro (Mooro), Wednesday, 28 December 2005 18:17 (twenty years ago)
― koogs (koogs), Thursday, 29 December 2005 22:35 (twenty years ago)
I've been looking at some of the Hauppage ones but the write-ups on them are very varied.
― Porkpie (porkpie), Sunday, 1 January 2006 15:20 (twenty years ago)
Good info here:
http://forum.digitalspy.co.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=119
― Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Sunday, 1 January 2006 16:10 (twenty years ago)
― Mooro (Mooro), Monday, 2 January 2006 12:35 (twenty years ago)
― the bellefox, Monday, 2 January 2006 13:07 (twenty years ago)
Yesterday I pressed the red button hoping for all the goalmouth action, but all I got was a load of souped-up Ceefax reports.
PF, go on, take the plunge.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 09:09 (twenty years ago)
I am intrigued to see which way you go on Saturday afternoons, PJM - to BBCi's Score Interactive with Stubbsy or Sky Sports News with Stelling(sy). Or out, to the shops.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 09:31 (twenty years ago)
Incidentally, I think they must have those laptop gadgets. Or is that just my imagination getting the better of me?
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 09:54 (twenty years ago)
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 3 January 2006 17:22 (twenty years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 3 January 2006 22:05 (twenty years ago)
I ask because I am having difficulty training my family to switch it off when they switch the telly off and I need to get just the right level of psycho dad-ness.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 09:05 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 11:07 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 11:19 (twenty years ago)
One piece of information that has been mentioned which is true is that there is little difference in power consumption etc between the on and standby modes of a Sky box. All standby does is switch off the video output, the box is otherwise completely functional.
Is a Sky box the same as a Freeview box, only with different channels?
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 11:28 (twenty years ago)
But then I'm the sort of person who's convinced that all this talk of the oncoming "energy crisis" could be solved by everyone switching off their computers when they leave work at night.
― James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 12:26 (twenty years ago)
― Johnny B Was Quizzical (Johnney B), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 12:28 (twenty years ago)
― Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 12:31 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 12:45 (twenty years ago)
(the tivo has real problems with grass, smoke, fire, tv static and especially water on lower qualities)
― koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 12:51 (twenty years ago)
― Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 12:57 (twenty years ago)
There's the Little People inside mine.
I switch my computer off at night and I have recently started going round switching off lights.
Do I really have to wait until March for a choice of two football matches?
grass, smoke, fire, tv static and especially water
I wish to make a poor quality joke out of this.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 13:03 (twenty years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 13:35 (twenty years ago)
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,1558,1573979,00.asp
― koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 13:58 (twenty years ago)
― koogs (koogs), Wednesday, 4 January 2006 14:02 (twenty years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 13:52 (twenty years ago)
Not the fridge.
I can't believe some people don't even turn their computers off.
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2006 13:58 (twenty years ago)
I read years ago that modern computers have very low power consumption, so don't feel too guilty about leaving it on. Is that correct?
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 14:13 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 14:15 (twenty years ago)
i fear that if i switch off my tv or vcr at the mains, they will forget all their presets. is that insane?
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 14:25 (twenty years ago)
If that is not true, though, then I think Alba is being rather impatient. Surely you can switch it on and use it a minute later, and save power, rather than leave it on the whole time. But again, what do I know? When I try to put my computer on standby it basically shuts down - it returns to life frozen and unusable, and must be, I think, Reset.
Why a laptop computer is not using power, I don't know. But again - what do I know?
― the bellefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2006 14:43 (twenty years ago)
I have erased Community TV and Teachers TV and Bloomberg. Perhaps I am becoming reckless. I am tempted to erase the pop video channels too.
I think the VCR will forget the time if you switch it off at the plug.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 15:03 (twenty years ago)
― Mooro (Mooro), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 15:49 (twenty years ago)
i unplug it, it uses battery power while asleep.
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 15:59 (twenty years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 16:07 (twenty years ago)
Back in the days when I had an attention span.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 17:43 (twenty years ago)
ITV3 has been superceded in our affections by More4 and ITV4 (all yr ITC/RAI needs).
They're talking about debut hat-tricks on Sky Sports News. I bet they don't mention Tony Cottee OR if they mention Ian St John they neglect to point out that Everton beat Liverpool 4-3 in that match.
Hang on, I have email, they have email...
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 20:42 (twenty years ago)
I have taken to watching National Geographic's rubbish list programmes (Top 10 "when bears fall out of trees onto trampolines", that sort of thing - seriously, the other night I watched a bear fall out of a tree onto a trampoline. It bounced off the trampoline and fell head first onto the ground. Then they followed it with some people who nearly drowned trying to rescue a cow off a cliff. Do you even get National Geographic on Digibox?
I still haven't watched anything on ITV4. Too many channels!
― ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 21:13 (twenty years ago)
An old-fashioned valve amplifier would definitely last longer if it was kept switched on all the time - valves are really just a sophisticated sort of lightbulb, and valve failure nearly always occurs at switch-on.
― Forest Pines (ForestPines), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 21:25 (twenty years ago)
Middling? Vehicle?
It's a terrific picture!
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2006 21:44 (twenty years ago)
I'm now watching a Snow show on one of the normal channels about land ownership. Pam is getting quite angry.
(I shamefully have left my CD player, phono pre-amp, line-level pre-amp, and monoblocs switched on for weeks at a time. The CD player has a class A output stage so it's probably sucking power from the wall like nobody's business 24 hours a day. It's the only concession to audiophile lore I make thesedays. I accept I'm also killing the planet).
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 21:56 (twenty years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 21:57 (twenty years ago)
Seeing as we are picking on your writing, you also made 'thesedays' into one word. Is that a new usage, like Morrissey's 'Everyday' meaning ... 'every day'?
I suppose I can meet you halfway on Quick Change.
― the pinefox, Tuesday, 10 January 2006 22:02 (twenty years ago)
The MOD owns 600,000 acres of land in the UK - cor! The mods own only a few promenades.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 22:17 (twenty years ago)
Another parallel is 'Inbetween Days', where I am not sure the first word is quite a proper word.
It is only now that I understand what you meant by 'Snow show'.
The rockers, I suppose, own only a red guitar, three chords and the truth?
― the pinefox, Wednesday, 11 January 2006 13:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Vicky (Vicky), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 13:52 (nineteen years ago)
See http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/terrestrial/mux/
If you can't get BBC3 (Mux1), you probably can't get BBC1, BBC2 or News 24 either?
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 16:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Vicky (Vicky), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 16:21 (nineteen years ago)
I call serial commas, "the Oxford Comma". Sounds much posher.
This morning: red button goals galore action from the likes of EVERTON.
In the near future:
Friday 20 January - 1900-2030 GMT, BBC THREEGroup A: Egypt v Libya
Saturday 21 January - 1900-2110 GMT, BBC THREEGroup A: Morocco v Ivory CoastGroup B: Cameroon v AngolaGroup B: Togo v DR Congo
Sunday 22 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREEGroup C: Tunisia v ZambiaGroup C: South Africa v Guinea
Monday 23 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREEGroup D: Nigeria v GhanaGroup D: Zimbabwe v Senegal
Tuesday 24 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREEGroup A: Libya v Ivory CoastGroup A: Egypt v Morocco
Wednesday 25 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREEGroup B: Angola v DR CongoGroup B: Cameroon v Togo
Thursday 26 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREEGroup C: Zambia v GuineaGroup C: Tunisia v South Africa
Friday 27 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREEGroup D: Ghana v SenegalGroup D: Nigeria v Zimbabwe
Saturday 28 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREEGroup A: Egypt v Ivory CoastGroup A: Libya v Morocco
Sunday 29 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREEGroup B: Angola v TogoGroup B: Cameroon v DR Congo
Monday 30 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREEGroup C: Tunisia v GuineaGroup C: Zambia v South Africa
Tuesday 31 January - 1900-2100 GMT, BBC THREEGroup D: Nigeria v SenegalGroup D: Ghana v Zimbabwe
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 19 January 2006 11:09 (nineteen years ago)
― the bellefox, Wednesday, 25 January 2006 21:05 (nineteen years ago)
R.W. Burchfield - The New Fowler's Modern English Usage.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 26 January 2006 09:46 (nineteen years ago)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4614598.stm
"The guy who owns it really should do the lottery because the chances of sending out a signal from a digibox and sending out precisely and exactly on a major emergency channel are far more than 14 million to one."
Today:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/4712122.stm
SO JUST WHAT ARE THE ODDS?
It's ironic that this thread has turned into a bit of an S.O.S. list.
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 14 February 2006 14:48 (nineteen years ago)
― The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Tuesday, 14 February 2006 14:51 (nineteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 14 February 2006 15:01 (nineteen years ago)
More digibox excitement: the other day I put it on top of the DVD player, and when I tried to play a DVD it wouldn't work, just kept saying "CLOSE" and flickering about. Took DVD back to library as "damaged". Got replacement DVD. Also refused to work. Tried DVD that is personal property and known to work. Would not work. Moved digibox. All was sweetness and light again.That was a bit longwinded. To sum up:
a) I am a joey.
b) My digibox lacks some kind of "shielding".
c) funny old world.
I want one of those Humax recording things.
I wonder if ITV Digital boxes are collectors' items?
3-way at Argos sounds absolutely delightful. Brings a whole new meaninglessness to "please go to your collection point".
-- PJ Miller (pjmiller6...), January 4th, 2007.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 4 January 2007 08:58 (nineteen years ago)
Directly after last night's opening episode of gritty kidnap drama FIVE DAYS, a disembodied voice suggested that I "set [my] recorder" to make sure I managed to catch "all the episodes".
Did anyone else hear this, or was it a subliminal message?
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 11:18 (eighteen years ago)
It's just my impression, because I don't actually know, but isn't the US pretty far behind when it comes to digital broadcasting in general? Clinton signed a bill that said all transmissions had to be digital by a certain year (I think it was 2007) but Americans have never even heard of digital radio, much less TV.
The other thing that occurs to me is that maybe that's a good thing! Digital television seems like the final nail in the coffin of "the public airwaves", i.e. the idea that no-one can own the magnetic fields of Earth, and no-one can own all the air one must vibrate in order to broadcast radio and television signals. Because governments are "auctioning" the spectrum off. Am I misled in the thought that this is a very different concept from what has heretofore prevailed, i.e. that broadcasters used the frequency spectrum at the public's pleasure?
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:07 (eighteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:11 (eighteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:12 (eighteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:14 (eighteen years ago)
a) your aerial is crap or badly alignedb) it is in the shadow of somethingc) Signal strength is poor till analogue switchoff occurs (although this is not much of a problem in London, compare to the other two).
Government are auctioning licences rather than selling off spectrum, but it does amount to the same thing. Multiplexing is what is centralising the airwaves. Bouquets of channels need to be broadcast from the same place rather than in a distributed fashion so there are gate keepers other than the government and TV-Channels in the mix.
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:19 (eighteen years ago)
I also worry that because digital broadcasting has been taken up in a climate where the spectrum has been auctioned, rather than... what, borrowed? - then there will bo no obligation whatsoever to provide public service programming, i.e. educational programming, programing for kids, etc. And government requirements, both in the US and the UK, for broadcasters to permanently switch off their analogue transmitters forever, seem like a government enforcement of this privatization (not to mention an enforcement to buy expensive new kit).
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:23 (eighteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:25 (eighteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:27 (eighteen years ago)
indeed the bbc was explicitly made into a govt propaganda outlet during the general strike, and then during ww2.
there was a huge row re. coal mines being under private property. iirc the landowners got paid.
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:30 (eighteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:34 (eighteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:36 (eighteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:38 (eighteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:41 (eighteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:44 (eighteen years ago)
the biggest constitutional upheaval since 1688 (1910-14) ended in a weird kind of stalemate (in which the authority of parliament had to be maintained *against* the public (women, unions).
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:48 (eighteen years ago)
Does reception affect things like bitrate? I didn't know it worked like that - I thought you either got the picture quality as broadcast or you got break-up. I thought what Tracer was complaining about was things like 1980s drama serials on ITV2 looking like they've been converted on someone's laptop in ten minutes by some freeware.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:55 (eighteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:57 (eighteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:59 (eighteen years ago)
I get more drop-outs on less premium AKA shit channels. Is that for the same reason, or am I doolally?
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:18 (eighteen years ago)
Have had no drop-outs so far, except when I thought the sound was out on Big Brother, having not realized that's just the way the show is.
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:20 (eighteen years ago)
That is artefacting and has to do with the channel purchasing a paltry amount of bitrate.
Which channel was it?
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:22 (eighteen years ago)
ha, i spent last night doing exactly that. (although was bbc2 comedy from 1995)(and it was taking about 14 minutes per half hour)
> Bitrate is different. The less premium channels run at lower bitrates and are prone to artefacting.
this is what i thought tracer meant upthread - artefacting / pixelation.
oddly the worst picture i've seen is on csi on five via analogue - facial shadows were a lot darker than they should've been - like they'd been digitised on a 16 colour amiga or something. without dithering.
― My Koogy Weighs A Ton (koogs), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:24 (eighteen years ago)
sounds like a dodgy scart connection to me.
― Johnney B English (stigoftdump), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:30 (eighteen years ago)
TV was better at 405 lines. There must be a sloganed T-shirt I can get to that effect.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:32 (eighteen years ago)
(Give me a break - 3 hours of sleep a night for the last six nights!)
xpost - pixellisationing up is so hard to do.
― Bhumibol Adulyadej (Lucretia My Reflection), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:34 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:35 (eighteen years ago)
ebay. they stopped making new ones about two years after they started (which is a pity because it's a great bit of kit). other (inferior) boxes that do the same thing (after a fashion) are available... the humax seems popular.
(the one thing that does bug me with the tivo is the american use of channel numbers. bbc is 21 for instance. which is fine and you get used to it quite quickly because the names are there next to the numbers. but then the digital channels come along and are also numbered in the same range as the terrestrial channels so instead of bbc1, itv1, bbc2 etc being adjacent they are now interleaved with filum4 and fiveUS and the like. fiddly.)
― My Koogy Weighs A Ton (koogs), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)
and they're finally giving her an Oscar after decades of neglect.
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:51 (eighteen years ago)
― Bhumibol Adulyadej (Lucretia My Reflection), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:51 (eighteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:53 (eighteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:55 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:06 (eighteen years ago)
just shoved a hoooge disk in it because 40 hours wasn't enough. it's open enough so that you can do that. i think later models and all the imposters are locked down tightly so you have to go the official upgrade route. or don't bother.
all the major manufacturers do them now, the sony thing won awards in christmas "What Hifi (And Surround Sound System And Half A Dozen Other Categories)" thing. can get them with dvd burners and hard disks and stuff but they tend to be expensive (tivo was £400 when i bought, £200 a year later, £99 for one weekend in some obscure chain about a year after that that was getting rid of theirs)(that said, first nicam video recorder i bought was £399 so...).
i wouldn't've thought volume would affect bitrate. besides, audio bitrate and video bitrate tend to be independant. the compression trick is the reason mute buttons were invented. if they try and grab my attention that way they get muted out. see also: flashing banner ads and adblock
― My Koogy Weighs A Ton (koogs), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:36 (eighteen years ago)
Audio compression: when audio signal peaks are brought below a certain level to prevent clipping in the audio signal when it is digitised or otherwise transmitted. This is usually accompanied by some gain normalisation to make sure that the sound power level is brought back up to what it was before compression. Heavy compression and normalisation is what makes the adverts sound louder
Compressing the audio: Using a codec, (AC3 and MP2 are the most common for TV) to reduce the bitrate of the audio signal.
Video Legalising, brinigin the video signal to within the parameters of the tranmission system, i.e. making sure that the Luminance, Chrominance and Variage of the signal all fall within specified limits, in a modern all digital workflow this is normally done at the editing stage.
Video Compression: Using a codec (MPEG-2) to reduce the bitrate of the video signal.
Artefacting: blockyness, blotchiness brought on by over compression of the video signal or inexpertly applied compression. In general older poorer video sources compress poorly and show more digital artefacts because they don't have the sharp focus and bright tones footage of modern digital material and because of existing analogue artefacts You can also get artefact with high motion video at low bitrates.
Blocking or Pixilation: If the MPEG-2 transport stream is interrupted then data integrity will break down. The picture is encode by block of pixels, if it can maintain the picture by holding a block for a few frames then the system will try to do this in an effort to keep something on screen whilst this system tries to recapture the stream. this causes squares on the screen to appear to freeze, go black or change to unexpected colours.
― Ed (dali), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)
"Don't forget to set your *digital* recorder so that you catch every episode."
I half expect them to say "don't forget to set your Humax PVR 500..." tonight.
Sometimes the picture goes away but the subtitles stay. What's all that about?
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 25 January 2007 12:22 (eighteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Thursday, 25 January 2007 12:24 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 25 January 2007 12:31 (eighteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Thursday, 25 January 2007 12:32 (eighteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Thursday, 25 January 2007 12:43 (eighteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Thursday, 25 January 2007 12:46 (eighteen years ago)
part 2 (universally judged inferior i think) is on film4 on saturday:
http://www.channel4.com/film/reviews/film.jsp?id=132014
in related news (kinda), ftn is showing Takeshi's Castle starting in a week or two. first time on freeview.
― Koogy Bloogies (koogs), Thursday, 25 January 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Thursday, 25 January 2007 17:55 (eighteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 26 January 2007 09:50 (eighteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Friday, 26 January 2007 09:57 (eighteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Friday, 26 January 2007 11:46 (eighteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Friday, 26 January 2007 11:51 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, cos it's supposed to be one better, innit? That's the point.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 26 January 2007 11:57 (eighteen years ago)
15:35 Relocation, Relocation16:40 Relocation, Relocation17:45 Relocation, Relocation18:50 Snowmail18:55 Relocation, Relocation20:00 Relocation, Relocation21:00 Inside Waco23:05 GBH00:40 Relocation, Relocation
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 10 February 2007 19:47 (eighteen years ago)
― g00blar (gooblar), Saturday, 10 February 2007 20:47 (eighteen years ago)
― PJ Miller, Thursday, 22 February 2007 13:17 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael Jones, Thursday, 22 February 2007 16:55 (eighteen years ago)
― Ed, Thursday, 22 February 2007 16:57 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael Jones, Thursday, 22 February 2007 19:55 (eighteen years ago)
― Michael Jones, Thursday, 22 February 2007 19:56 (eighteen years ago)
― koogs, Friday, 23 February 2007 08:50 (eighteen years ago)
― PJ Miller, Friday, 23 February 2007 09:30 (eighteen years ago)