Paul Thomas Anderson: C or D?

amen, brotha! It sickens me, as a film geek, to see the magazines and critics and such hailing some guy with 2 credits under his belt as the "next Kubrick, next Scorsese"... hell, the "next Tarantino, even". Perhaps the long-range effects will be akin to strangling an artist's precious room for growth, for change, for risk-taking, for DARING to make a film that doesn't have the same "razzle-dazzle" as his/her "last one". It's a cliche, but it's true: Go back and look at the very first films of many old-time directors: See how many of THOSE feature glimpses of the directorial style/genius those people would come to be known for. Yet, on the basis of today's critics/hipsters/audiences, Hitchcock would be a horrible failure -- after all, he didn't really hit a stylistic "stride" until after a decade or so into his career.

the context in which directors like walsh, ford, hitchcock, etc. honed their skills doesn't exist any more. hollywood simply doesn't make as many films anymore, so there's less chance for directors to apprentice on low-risk pictures. also because of the whole culture of film schools and film buffs, there are 1000x more prospective directors, all of whom feel like they need to make a name for themself. So there's a repertory of "impressive" effects that they employ to do so. PTA has mastered these effects with admirable thoroughness and has even gone beyond them. But i still think he fits into that watch-what-I-can-do culture.

if the opporunity for apprenticeship exists it's in television. but directors who move from television are often ridiculed.

He's definitely indulgent (someone needs to tell him that Philip Baker Hall isn't as great an actor as PTA seems to think), and it's unfortunate that he's determined to put some Mamet in with his Altman. But I'm glad to see someone is doing something with the Altman-esque form, ESPECIALLY if he uses actors like Phil Hoffman and John C. Reilly.

yeah it was a melodrama but it was so honest in its misery and meloncholy, and so difficult to watch it, the frogs seemed to be nessecary to alleviate the tension.

amateurist=the film Geir? ;)

strangely, the first thing that comes to mind is the laughable scene in "Dressed to Kill" where the black thugs at the train station exist solely to menace Nancy Allen and chase after her purty lil' white booty... i.e. their blackness is used as shorthand for "menacing strangers"... and this from a guy who howls at reruns of "All in the Family", okay!

god that is so ILM

it's been around for like six hours dude.

At least he's better than Aronofsky, imo, who is even more entrenched in flashy filmschooly formalism at the expensive of character development.

hah expense, sorry

something about tarkovsky's supa long takes makes them more tolerable. i think its because they seem to be just images with a real aesthetic quality to them, whereas bela tarr just had very long shots of people walking, for like, 7 minutes. sometimes it owkred, but as i got more tired, i got less patient. and it seemed to be underlong in some places: the point where the looters find the old man in the bath could have dwwelt a bit longer on the scene...

WTF?? There are only six or seven threads (!) and at least three of them are just me waffling about nothing. I'm not sure if Amateurist is being funny when he gets like this. Or is he just 1 BIG hata? :p

uk ilxors, magnolia is on ch. 4 tonight, 11pm.

So now then...

http://www.ptanderson.com/featurefilms/magnolia/articlesandinterviews/magessay.htm

Boogie Nights and Magnolia are both overweening Grand Statements -- saying what, I couldn't tell you. Tho the frogs ALMOST saved Magnolia.

but the vvv enjoyable scorsese-altman fest 'boogie nights' is not a big statement. it's just a lot of fun.

PDF of new Esquire feature on PTA's early years: http://www.cigarettesandredvines.com/news/?p=197

Nice read!

Good! I haven't actually read it myself yet.

Is there a 'There will be blood' thread on here? Finally saw this the other day and I need the ILE assessment.

for starters:

daniel day lewis is the most important person in the world

anticiapte "There Will Be Blood" by paul thomas anderson

cheerz. need to brush up on my searching technique.

Paul Thomas Anderson set to shoot his Scientology film

Paul Thomas Anderson set to shoot his Scientology film Paul Thomas Anderson, director of Magnolia and Boogie Nights, is set to start shooting a movie about a science fiction author who founds a religion. Called his "untitled Scientology film," it will star Philip Seymour Hoffman as the "master."

This movie, nicknamed The Master by fans, has been in the works for a while and has had a number of cool actors attached. But now the Cigarettes and Red Vines blog has gotten confirmation from Anderson himself that the movie starts shooting soon. Anybody who has seen Magnolia - with that scene where the motivational speaker character screams, "RESPECT the COCK!" - knows that Anderson's the right director to do this thing.

The Playlist got its hands on an early script for the movie, and reports:

"The Master" is the story of a charismatic intellectual (Philip Seymour Hoffman) who hatches a faith-based organization that begins to catch on in America in 1952 called The Cause. The core dynamic centers on the relationship between The Master and Freddie Sutton, (would be absolutely perfect for Paul Dano) an aimless twenty-something drifter and alcoholic who eventually becomes the leader's loyal lieutenant. As the faith begins to gain a fervent following, Freddie finds himself questioning the belief system he has embraced, and his mentor.

Apparently there are enough parallels between the life story of L. Ron Hubbard and the "master" character to make it abundantly obvious what this movie is about. Even though, for legal reasons, you won't hear the S-word mentioned.

(would be absolutely perfect for Paul Dano)

ok so this sez exactly what the dynamic must be btwn the characters and wants it to be twbb 2 i guess

I am stoked for this!

I hope there is a Jack Parsons guy in it.

^^^^oh man YES

Also johnny crunch idk that I's worry about it being There Will be Blood 2" bcz that really bad writer who wrote that piece isn't doing the casting, I bet.

xpost -- There'd better be. Hell, a Jack Parsons movie would be enough.

booooo

http://theplaylist.blogspot.com/2010/09/paul-thomas-andersons-untitled.html

that sucks

also, i thought somebody was making a jack parsons biopic, but maybe i am making that up?

Conspiracy theory in the comments -- interesting.

given that pta and psh have both collabed with tom cruise, i was surprised by this project tbh

Back on.

Megan Ellison: the over privileged heiress it's ok to like

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpFzJXQMgCE

We've been talking about the trailers to death over here:

THE MASTER (2012) P.T. Anderson's film on the origions of Scientology (sort of), Starring Philip Seymour Hoffman, Joaquin Phoenix, Amy Adams, and Laura Dern

Been a while since I saw a picture, but ... old!

http://static01.nyt.com/images/2014/09/28/arts/28INHERENT/28INHERENT-master675.jpg

Happens to the best of us.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/28/movies/paul-thomas-anderson-films-inherent-vice.html

A 180-degree turn from Mr. Anderson’s relentless oil odyssey “There Will Be Blood,” “Inherent Vice” is his most comedic and anarchic film since “Boogie Nights.” It’s a stoner detective film so overstuffed with visual gags and gimmicks that the filmmaker said he was inspired by slapstick spoofs like “Top Secret!” and “Airplane!”

Feeling that. Joanna Newsom narrating is...interesting

she's pretty perfect for Sortilége though

is this a marked tonal shift from Pynchon's book?

Anderson is only 44, obv has spent too much time in the sun.

the book is pretty wacky

I have wariness about PTA doing wacky, just from the Sandler abomination. Still Phoenix, Benicio dT, Eric Roberts and Martin Short in the same cast.

Awaiting the trailer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZfs22E7JmI

PTA's "Big Lebowski?"

Treating the book like a ZAS sketch is the best approach, but I dunno if this guy has it in him.

Trailer seems like it's got the ZAZ timing down!

Looks like jackie brown too. Anyway. I don't see the point in movies anymore.

good, we're trying to get all of you out, esp the rep theaters

PTA's "Big Lebowski?"

― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:03 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I was about to post the same thing, but I have a feeling it's more the trailer than the movie.

But you know, Hollywood being Hollywood. Literally impossible to market a movie without trying to convince people it's like some other movie they've already seen.

I dunno, stoner shaggy dog So Cal detective story? Got its similarities no matter what. Though given his MO surely PTA had "The Long Goodbye" in mind.

jeez, PTA looks like he's aged ten years since PSH died. he looks pretty gaunt compared to those photos from february of him at the funeral

http://blog.sfgate.com/dailydish/files/2014/02/anderson.jpg

2012:

http://www3.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Paul+Thomas+Anderson+Philip+Seymour+Hoffman+wyhPLfcvfL4l.jpg

he still smokes, yea?

didn't bother with the book but this looks great

i had no use for the book but ripping good trailer

I literally took a shit on the book but can't wait for the movie.

geez toilet paper isn't THAT expensive

it and Lot 49 are the only Pynchon I can stand.

i.e. read it – it's fun

xp i liked the book, it was pretty fun.

books should be fun!

Lot 49 is def my favorite - found V a slog and Vineland sort of stupid but Inherent Vice is working in a vein I have a fondness for

xp

book was great fun, and made me think of big lebowski a lot so not surprised at any similarities.

To get a grip on the project, he adapted the entire 384-page novel sentence by sentence. “I basically just transcribed it so I could look at it like it was a script,” he said. “It looked like a doorstop. But I can understand this format. As big as it was, it was easier for me to cut down.”

kinda wished he just filmed the whole thing as a mini-series.

kind of loved the book tbh

it's fun

Josh Brolin looks like exceedingly good value in this. My enthusiasm dissipated when I saw Owen Wilson though.

his skin doesn't look good in that photo up above, but his hair looks good

i feel like that NYT photo was just an exceedingly bad picture following quite closely on from the death of his pal.

he should shave that beard thing though.

PTA used to be pretty cute

can't fathom hatin on the Butterscotch Stallion

xp

i love that this is where this thread is at. he has made some pretty good movies but he mainly exists in my head as just such a handsome guy. the nyt picture's taken under that tunnel on central park west, somewhere in the sixties, isn't it? all blustery. i am p sure there will be a nyff premiere pic at which he looks his usual dapper salt & pepper ruggedly urbane self & we will all be able to stand down & not worry so much. even if we are in an autumn of paul thomas anderson's handsomeness, it is still a while until wintertime.

My enthusiasm dissipated when I saw Owen Wilson though.

Right? I had the same reaction.

Oh, wow, this looks grea...oh, uh huh.

http://41.media.tumblr.com/2da8d04916414e3fed0abb86148845a6/tumblr_mjplw2womU1s2u10mo1_400.png

you get what you give

shave + bucket hat = no longer looks 60

(or is that from 1998?)

That's got to be old, when he was dating Fiona.

Yeah, uh, Fiona herself looks like she's been suffering through some tough times, if the recent pictures I've seen of her are anything to go by.

man, that photo. he's wearing sandals on the red carpet! should be a crime IMO.

http://www.vulture.com/2015/07/paul-thomas-anderson-will-write-rdjs-pinocchio.html

was hoping that would be the other RDJ

New documentary out today, who knew?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLhSyy6UM94

yeah they've been emailing me about it and yet i have no desire to bother

A local rep started a PTA series tonight: Hard Eight, Boogie Nights, Magnolia, and There Will Be Blood.

First time I've seen Hard Eight in 15 years--I watched it at home not too long after Boogie Nights. Didn't like it at all at the time; not surprisingly, I wanted to see The Father of Boogie Nights. Tonight's print, as the series host pointed out, looked like it had never been screened. (He also said you can't get it on DVD at the moment.)

I liked it more tonight than I did then, but I still see Boogie Nights as a quantum leap forward. (I'll put that to the test next week, but I have no reason to believe I'll change that viewpoint.) Hard Eight was more interesting to me than compelling. Thought it built pretty well for the first half, then you have that endless scene in the hotel room where things go bad. It regained its footing after that, and offered some credible backstory to Philip Baker Hall's character (which I'd completely forgotten, so I was again "I don't get this guy at all"). I think there's one fantastic performance--not Hall, and not Philip Seymour Hoffman (he's good, but he's there and gone in the blink of an eye), but Sam Jackson. It's nestled in there between Jungle Fever/Pulp Fiction and Jackie Brown--he was so unbelievably good during that run. As tedious as I found the hotel room scene between Hall, Baker, and Reilly, I thought the long scene where Jackson set Baker straight balanced the scale. (And Baker sitting waiting in the chair could very well have been on Tarantino's mind when he made Jackie Brown.)

Besides the cast (extending to Robert Ridgely and Melora Walters), there are a couple of unmistakable links to Boogie Nights. The main theme--this weirdly still bit where it sounds like a bell is being rung--is used again in Boogie Nights when Wahlberg hooks up with that guy in the parking lot. And when Jackson harangues Hall about the old-time gangsters, he mentions Floyd Gondolli; that's Hall's character in Boogie Nights (who may or may not be the same Gondolli).

If you think Hard Eight is better than Boogie Nights, I'm guessing you're someone who's content with the direction Anderson started to take with There Will Be Blood. I thought of Truffaut's famous quote on the way home tonight, about all great movies either being about the joy or the agony of making cinema. (Flowery, I know, but memorable.) Boogie Nights is the one film of PTA's that is completely--well, give or take a couple of scenes during the Hello-'80s meltdown--about the joy. And it's still far and away my favourite. (Before the film, they had a trailer for the series cut from all four films, scored to Three Dog Night's "One." The trailer got an ovation and deserved to.)

You can't get it cheap, but you can get it:

http://www.amazon.com/Hard-Eight-Special-Samuel-Jackson/dp/B00000K3D3/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1513402441&sr=8-2&keywords=hard+eight

Supposedly Criterion is working on an edition of Hard Eight/Sydney.

As tedious as I found the hotel room scene between Hall, Baker, and Reilly

Better than if I'd written "between Philip, Baker, and Hall," but what I meant was Hall, Paltrow, and Reilly.

If you think Hard Eight is better than Boogie Nights, I'm guessing you're someone who's content with the direction Anderson started to take with There Will Be Blood.

How so? I don't much like There Will Be Blood but like Hard Eight. The Master and Inherent Vice are his best.

I regard Hard Eight as a one-off chamber piece, an exercise by a young filmmaker testing his limits.

What I meant was that Hard Eight is dark and brooding and slow, that Boogie Nights is anything but (except for those couple of scenes from the 1980 section), and that that's where his films have resided since There Will Be Blood at least. (Inherent Vice was probably an attempt to loosen up some again--I think it's the least interesting film he's ever done.) If you take his career from start to finish, Boogie Nights is the anomaly. And, for me, the best.

70mm screenings of PT's PT

http://www.indiewire.com/2017/12/phantom-thread-70mm-screenings-1201905384/

You can't get it cheap, but you can get it:

You could have bought that film print yourself, too.

Before the Boogie Nights screening tonight--a 35mm print that Warners supposedly gave them a hard time over, suggesting they play a Blue-Ray instead--Brendan, host of the series, brought a friend with guitar up and they played "Feel My Heat." Pretty funny.

Notwithstanding that I have watched it too many times (not for quite a while, though), the film still amazes me. Even the dark, slow section, where I can understand the argument that it seems layered on--things fall apart now, because they have to fall apart--the way PTA cuts between Wahlberg in the parking lot and Reynolds/Graham in the limo, and then links both of those scenes to Cheadle in the donut store, all of that is masterful (punctuated by immediately going into the spectacular Alfred Molina scene). And I love everything after that: Wahlberg's apology, and the beautiful--except for the Colonel--grace note of the last five minutes. Really, the '80s third of the film is no less great, I'd say, than what comes before it.

Looks like the new one doesn't have a credited cinematographer, yet again--I wonder what happened between him and Elswit.

He turns 71 in a few days, maybe he wants to just chill idk

If Anderson and his crew enjoyed the collaborative experience on Phantom Thread, makes sense to carry on and develop that. Being 90% shot in the same environment was probably a good training-wheels experience for lighting?

...though I just went to check my memory on that and found that Elswit said (on a Mission Impossible podcast) that reuniting for Inherent Vice didn't feel so good:

“God, I don’t know what it is anymore. It’s like a bad married couple. Unpleasant.”

Asked whether he could see them collaborating again, Elswit didn’t sound optimistic. “I don’t know. Probably not. You know, it depends on how he feels. I would do it again…I didn’t enjoy myself on ‘Inherent Vice’…It was a combination of me and Paul just not getting along, and I can be as immature as him.”

And when he was asked about Thread for Adam Nayman's PTA book:

“Well, I know how he did it, because it’s the same people I work with, it’s the same crew. He just threw a lot of smoke in the room. Which he never would let me do, he never let me smoke a set. Not that I wanted to — I mean, he wanted it for a scene. But I think he shot tests and he knew enough that he didn’t know enough. But with the modern stocks you can do minimal low lighting and you can lower the contrast and shoot all the detail you want, just by adding smoke. I can’t imagine I would have done it that way and I probably could have talked him out of it if he wanted to.”

“But yeah it was a period film, it was okay and had really good locations. I enjoyed the film. I just…if I’d shot that movie I would not be happy with it ending up looking like it looked, that’s all. But I liked the movie. I actually like it better than anything else I’ve done or he’s done with me or without me. I like it more than “The Master” and I like it more than “Inherent Vice.”

He turns 71 in a few days

Really? Wow--had no idea. I would never have guessed that Boogie Nights was made by someone almost 50; always thought PTA was around 30 at the time.

PTA is 50 now, he's referring to Elswit.

I'm laughing at myself...that makes sense.

Lol, I pointed that because I also misread it at first but realized that couldn't possibly be right.

Just watched Phantom Thread the other day and wow what a film... why do I have such a love/hate relationship with PTA? Couldn't stand Magnolia, Punch Drunk Love, and Inherent Vice but I adored Boogie Nights, There Will Be Blood and now Phantom Thread. What a weirdo.

https://x.com/JarmuschMood/status/1752353224860827696?s=20

yeah, they're shooting that up in Humboldt County. A bunch of PA's went into a thrift store multiple times to buy clothes for the extras, they're stoked

Vineland? Holy Shit! Is that confirmed?

More details... they're being cagey about what they're filming

https://www.sfgate.com/sf-culture/article/leonardo-dicaprio-eureka-arcata-movie-filming-bc-18636090.php

DiCaprio in a bathrobe and scenes of paramilitary forces would definitely fit.

the thing i saw said the movie had a "contemporary" setting

Disappointed Leo isn't wearing the party dress and carrying the ladies' chainsaw.

More cast announced: Alana Haim, Teyana Taylor, Wood Harris, Shayna McHayle (aka Junglepussy)

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/paul-thomas-anderson-alana-haim-teyana-taylor-1235813631/

Chase Infiniti does already feel like a Pynchon name tbh

PTA was shooting in downtown Sacramento on Saturday :D

Sacramento Bee included this v bitchy aside in the report “The film is reportedly based on the Thomas Pynchon novel "Vineland." In a biting Associated Press review that ran in The Sacramento Bee on March 4, 1990, Mario Szichman called the novel "a sea of boredom, sailed by hardly recognizable characters." “

Noted. Thx for that
lmao “biting”

I know you'll recognize this: "It's a honor to leave the Chronicle and go work for the Sacramento Bee. Dare to dream, right, Robert?"

looool yes I loved that line lmao

Lol

Paul Thomas Anderson's 'One Battle After Another' starring Leonardo DiCaprio has test screened, and it's an action-filled comedy-thriller that updates Thomas Pynchon's Vineland for the modern era.

We have the first details: https://t.co/u4NFEX7oSb pic.twitter.com/l7gk9CrjLp

— The Film Stage 📽 (@TheFilmStage) January 25, 2025

❤️

https://t.co/izoefo70kO pic.twitter.com/VkWLhQVqVh

— sam "mx. mfa" y’all (@samiamrosenberg) January 25, 2025

(Whoops, didn't know it quoted the 2nd tweet Raymond already put out there)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ap-j8e9J5U0

looks kinda fun

Does it relate to Vineland at all?

"loosely inspired by" apparently

That looks quite a lot like Vineland, I think?

hearing that they shot some up in Humboldt County?

loving the mojave shots in the trailer.

ok this looks v much like it is my shit :D

i think i can set aside my deep dislike of leonardo dicarprio for this one. still, i wish i could understand why he needs to be in every movie

it's pretty simple. when he's in a movie, it makes more money. So if PTA wants a bigger budget, casting Leo helps him get it.

also interesting to note that Leo was going to be Dirk Diggler at one point, but dropped out to do Titanic.

At least he's in schlubby fuck-up Rick Dalton mode, that's the only acceptable Leo mode.

i don't know many normal people, or many people at all lol, but everyone i know dislikes leo. who are all these people who seem to like him? titanic nostalgia people?

maybe it's an overseas thing.

n.b. i'm not looking this up myself on the internet

Got more “actually acting” vibes from Leo than usual. I don’t like him but rather Leo than Joaquim any day.

Scrunchy Face is effective when he plays guys haunted by the loss of youth, like in Once Upon a Time....

I don't know if anyone past a certain age in 2025 is a fan of actors, period. My students don't know the names of anybody and have said they rarely watch a movie "because" of an actor (Chalamet has become an exception).

why bother with movies at all when they have one minute soap operas on the phone

Perhaps the closest thing to vintage brand stardom is the cults surrounding Zendaya, K-Stew, and Aubrey Plaza.

find it hard to dislike leo these days. he’s been good in a lot of his roles recently and seems like a decent guy

Aubrey Plaza has a cult?

seems like a decent guy

just don't let him around your daughter, provided she's under 25

Aubrey Plaza has a cult?

― Jordan s/t (Jordan), Friday, March 28, 2025 5:46 PM (twenty-three minutes ago) bookmarkflaglink

Yes

I think the draw of Leo has been the fact that he’s generally in pretty cool movies, and seems to pick his projects with great care. I was surprised to see he’s only been in five films since The Wolf of Wall Street — The Revenant, OUATIH, Don’t Look Up, Killers of the Flower Moon, and now this one.

I saw a 30 second tv ad already, this thing’s got a marketing budget

I’m well up for this. Agree it looks like a much more faithful adaptation than I’d been expecting given the “loosely inspired” talk, the big change if the trailer is anything to go by is that it is much more centred on the father character — the fakeout of the novel is that it largely ditches Zoyd after a couple of chapters and focuses on Prairie (and Sasha and Frenesi) I’m sort of hoping the trailer is similarly misleading

It’s interesting that it’s been updated to modern day since PTA is so known for period settings and Vineland is so much a novel of the 80s (explicitly in how it deals with Reagan and yuppies and ex radicals Selling Out but also in the details of its popcult concerns, mainly a preoccupation with all things ninja), however I read it for the first time a few weeks ago & it was certainly still chiming amid… all this

Looks like the army of rollerblading mall shoplifters make an appearance, I’m happy

New Thread: "It's Not Not Vineland...": One Battle After Another (PTA, Pynchon, DiCaprio etc.)

Rep screening of There Will Be Blood last night. First time I saw it, when it came out, I remember how exasperated I was feeling with those first 15 minutes; ~ 20 years and five or six viewings later, I think it's a very dark and fascinating film. In conjuction with the soundtrack, feels like a horror film at times.

Noticed something that, even though a meaningless coincidence, still got me wondering if there was something there. TWBB is always dated as 2007, even though both IMDB and Wikipedia list its first screening as January 2008; presumably it played festivals before that. Mad Men also launched in 2007, during the summer. Both have a prominent character--Don Draper, of course; in TWBB, the guy who pretends to be Plainview's brother--who steals the identity of a man they have a circumstantial relationship with and who dies.

Daniel Day-Lewis in his baptism scene and in the final scene is a rare example of over-the-top acting that works for me--amazing.

TWBB is always dated as 2007, even though both IMDB and Wikipedia list its first screening as January 2008; presumably it played festivals before that.

it didn't open wide until Jan 2008, but it opened in NY and LA in Dec 2007, which made it eligible for that year's Oscars.

I wonder why those two sites go with the opening-wide date; I don't see why those earlier screenings wouldn't count. I can maybe see putting festival screening to the side, but those December screenings aimed at awards (Toronto, too, I'm guessing--if so, I was no doubt there) are public screenings like any other.

I am not sure where you are seeing that on Wikipedia and IMDB.

Wiki:

"There Will Be Blood premiered at Fantastic Fest in Austin on September 29, 2007: it was first theatrically released in New York City and Los Angeles on December 26 and in selected international markets on January 25, 2008."

IMDB:

"Release date
United States
September 27, 2007(Fantastic Fest)
United States
December 10, 2007(New York City, New York, premiere)
United States
December 26, 2007(limited)
United States
January 2008(Palm Springs International Film Festival)
Canada
January 4, 2008(Toronto)
United States
January 25, 2008
..."

I just looked at this on IMDB--Release date January 25, 2008 (United States)--without clicking through for all that additional info. And I looked at this on the Google sidebar--Release date: January 11, 2008 (Canada)--and probably got that mixed up with Wikipedia. I'm old!

Wasn't PTA rumored (reported?) to have done a polish on "Killers of the Flower Moon"? Because I just saw a story in passing that he polished up Scorsese's next one, too.

Yes, he somewhat confirmed this. I'm not sure if he actually rewrote the script, but Scorsese asked him to take a look at it, and at minimum, he gave suggestions. What they were and whether he executed them himself (or wrote any dialogue), no one has said for sure.

I wonder what else he has had a hand in? This, Ridley's Napoleon, Killers ... was there a rumor he had something to do with Judd Apatow's/Adam Sandler's "Funny People"?

Would like to see a PTA Muppet movie

Despite my reservations with maybe half of his films, he's always been a great writer when it came to dialogue, maybe even the best. (I would take his dialogue over Quentin Tarantino or even David Mamet's any day). I remember seeing Boogie Nights for the first time at home with some friends, and maybe 30 minutes into it, someone said "I'm really digging the way this guy writes his movie" and we all agreed.

In his 2019 autobiography Baby Don't Hurt Me, Chris Kattan claimed that Paul Thomas Anderson (writer-director of Boogie Nights and Magnolia) and Richard LaGravenese (screenwriter of The Fisher King) each assisted with rewriting the script for Corky Romano, for which they received no official credit.

A too-many-cooks situation if ever there was one. (Actual amount of cooks needed: zero.)

negative c

cooks

FWIW, Tarantino did a polish/rewrite for his friend Julia Sweeney and It's Pat.

since when is tarantino Polish jk sorry i’ll go

Easy to spot Tarantino’s uncredited scenes in The Rock (Beatles explaining) and Crimson Tide (pop culture levity, if I remember right).

Would be funny if all they did was grammar, spellcheck and formatting. Like "oh, you were expecting me to REWRITE this? Hahah, no."

Always thought it was weird of Pat to just start tossing around the n-word like that.

best/weirdest ghostwriter is still Tom Stoppard on Revenge of the Sith

The Rock had Clement and Le Frenais doing a dialogue touch-up for Connery that supposedly resulted in a substantial rewrite too…

wonder which one of them came up with, "losers always whine about doing their best, winners go home and fuck the prom queen"

M. Night Shyamalan on Stuart Little

xp now imagining a little mouse saying that

PTA coaches little league!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm3H6fRRrLM