― Archel (Archel), Friday, 13 June 2003 09:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 13 June 2003 09:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 13 June 2003 09:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― joan vich (joan vich), Friday, 13 June 2003 09:50 (twenty-two years ago)
Don't get me started.
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Friday, 13 June 2003 09:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Friday, 13 June 2003 09:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Melissa W (Melissa W), Friday, 13 June 2003 09:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fred Nerk, Friday, 13 June 2003 09:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― robster (robster), Friday, 13 June 2003 09:57 (twenty-two years ago)
Though actually I read a book about ten years ago which i think was vanity published by a local author who had given a copy to the local library. The plot involved a really hard criminal escaping from rpison and somehow hiding out in a cave in Cornwall which led to a Lost World type cavern of dinosaurs. It was laughably poor, and even kids - who might have got off on the hackneyed second hand sense of wonder, would have been annoyed by the constant profanities and lack of intelligent dialogue spurted from the mouth of this hardened criminal.
The love interest was a brilliant and beautiful scientist by the way who I imagined looked a bit like Gabrielle Drake. I only read it all cos I was stuck in a train outside Croyden.
The Fungus is one of the most inept and yet imaginative and disgusting books I have ever read. Recomended for chapter 4 where a woman is eaten by here own thrush, and Chapter 5 when a man blows up due to too much yeast in his beer. The climax at the top of the giant mushroom on top of the Post Off ice Tower is more ridiculous than you can imagine. But terrifically enjoyable for all its faults.
― Pete (Pete), Friday, 13 June 2003 10:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Friday, 13 June 2003 11:06 (twenty-two years ago)
Need I say more?
― Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 13 June 2003 11:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― NA. (Nick A.), Friday, 13 June 2003 11:24 (twenty-two years ago)
Imagine my disappointment, then, when by the end of the first chapter they'd been unable to dig a tunnel due to being just kids and without any digging equipment but had managed to dig up some ancient roman pottery. The rest of the book appeared to be about the pottery (to be honest I didn't actually read it all the way through - it might have got good again after that, but I doubt it).
I was really, really annoyed at that - the back cover blurb made out that it was going to be all about these kids running through these secret tunnels and having underground battles with their enemies and that. But the author felt that reality had to intrude and he/she ruined a really funny and great idea. Bah.
― Chriddof (Chriddof), Friday, 13 June 2003 13:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sam (chirombo), Friday, 13 June 2003 13:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 13 June 2003 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 13 June 2003 14:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 13 June 2003 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 13 June 2003 14:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Friday, 13 June 2003 14:14 (twenty-two years ago)
I note that the hardcover has the subtitle "The uncooling of America", which is pretty clunky, but advances in clunk technology allows the paperback to be titled "Culture Jam: How to Reverse America's Suicidal Consumer Binge - and Why We Must"
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 13 June 2003 14:22 (twenty-two years ago)
I expect the worst book I've ever read all the way to the end is that same David Eddings ("The Seeress Of Kell" oh why do i remember this) but I think at the time I liked it. ahem. all those years months ago.
My english teacher (who honestly loved Eddings) recommended it.
I thought Martin Amis's 'Money' was really more repulsive than anything else I've read, although obv. "better written" than Eddings &c...
― thom west (thom w), Friday, 13 June 2003 14:41 (twenty-two years ago)
I used to write a lot of book reviews, so ploughed through loads of three-volume fantasy quest epics in the grand tradition of Tolkien, and loads of those were really terrible, but thankfully I have managed to forget any specific appalling examples. I have kept a copy of Janet Morris's The Golden Sword for the occasional pleasure of reading out the opening sentences of chapter 1 to amazed listeners.
In terms of books I didn't have any duty to read, I'm tempted to cite Salman Rushdie's 'The Ground Beneath Her Feet'. I wouldn't normally finish anything do dreadful and annoying, but the best of his previous work built him enough credit that I persevered, and there was a kind of car-crash-style fascination in what unspeakable nonsense about music would come next.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 13 June 2003 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 13 June 2003 19:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Friday, 13 June 2003 19:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― cis (cis), Friday, 13 June 2003 20:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 13 June 2003 20:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 13 June 2003 21:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ernest P. (ernestp), Friday, 13 June 2003 21:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― ThErEdNeD (ThErEdNeD), Friday, 13 June 2003 21:52 (twenty-two years ago)
That was my experience also. Although there was the time I found a copy of The Turner Diaries (notorious novel in which racists succeed in establishing a whites-only theocracy in North America), and considered buying it to add to my collection of utopian and dystopian books.
― j.lu (j.lu), Friday, 13 June 2003 22:57 (twenty-two years ago)
But the Adventures of Pete and Pete did a pretty good episode like this.
― David Beckhouse (David Beckhouse), Friday, 13 June 2003 23:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Saturday, 14 June 2003 01:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― daria g (daria g), Saturday, 14 June 2003 05:25 (twenty-two years ago)
(re: The Rotter's Club, I remember being quite taken aback with all this stuff about the UK I had absolutely no idea about whatsoever, I mean UNIONS & all this STUFF & that - Thatcher having the same effect on the UK as, say, Rogernomics/Ruthanasia did on NZ re : cutting off historical etc? dunno. & the book itself I cannot recall.)
― Ess Kay (esskay), Saturday, 14 June 2003 05:41 (twenty-two years ago)
Reads better as The Unbearable Lightness of Barf.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 14 June 2003 05:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 14 June 2003 06:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― H (Heruy), Saturday, 14 June 2003 06:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew L (Andrew L), Saturday, 14 June 2003 07:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 14 June 2003 10:51 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm tempted to put Michael Moore 'Stupid White Men' on the list but that's more just one that totally failed to live up to my expectations (all the reviews I'd read said it was *funny*). I cant stand Douglas Coupland or Julie Burchill either, but I havent ever finished anything they've written. I seem to remember throwing down Generation X in a rage.
― Cathy, Saturday, 14 June 2003 11:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― faggotry (faggotry), Saturday, 14 June 2003 13:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― adam (adam), Saturday, 14 June 2003 22:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 14 June 2003 22:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kim (Kim), Saturday, 14 June 2003 22:25 (twenty-two years ago)
The answers are 3 and 42, respectively.
― jennpb (jennpb), Saturday, 14 June 2003 22:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― vahid (vahid), Sunday, 15 June 2003 00:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― H (Heruy), Sunday, 15 June 2003 01:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Prude (Prude), Sunday, 15 June 2003 01:17 (twenty-two years ago)
I thought that book was fantastic. What didn't you like about it?
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 15 June 2003 04:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Cathy, Sunday, 15 June 2003 11:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Sunday, 15 June 2003 15:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― maura (maura), Sunday, 15 June 2003 17:21 (twenty-two years ago)
* Except the shagging at the end
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Sunday, 15 June 2003 18:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Sunday, 15 June 2003 18:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Sunday, 15 June 2003 21:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 15 June 2003 23:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chupa-Cabras (vicc13), Monday, 16 June 2003 01:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 16 June 2003 05:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ess Kay (esskay), Friday, 20 June 2003 05:35 (twenty-two years ago)
i would also say atlas shrugged, but i could only get to page 600 before throwing the damn thing against the wall.
― Tad (llamasfur), Friday, 20 June 2003 05:43 (twenty-two years ago)
OTM. Coe has a habit of writing books that start well and progressively suck more and more and end so suckily that you want to track down the fucker and beat the living crap out of him.
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 20 June 2003 05:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 20 June 2003 06:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― J-rock (Julien Sandiford), Friday, 20 June 2003 06:44 (twenty-two years ago)
About Martin Amis - I love Money but I've never really managed London Fields. But The Information seemed similar and I didn't like that much. I decided I wasn't a fan any more when I finished it, which was a bit of an apostasy for me.
― Sam (chirombo), Friday, 20 June 2003 08:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― RickyT (RickyT), Friday, 20 June 2003 08:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 20 June 2003 08:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― RickyT (RickyT), Friday, 20 June 2003 08:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― H (Heruy), Friday, 20 June 2003 09:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sam (chirombo), Friday, 20 June 2003 10:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― RickyT (RickyT), Friday, 20 June 2003 10:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― H (Heruy), Friday, 20 June 2003 10:40 (twenty-two years ago)
Worst book I've read... book I read recently that comes to mind is The Straw Men by someone Smith. Very poor changes in narrative, contrived plot, constantly "cheating" the reader for dramatic effect. All the bad things.
― Alan (Alan), Friday, 20 June 2003 10:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― TMFTML (TMFTML), Friday, 20 June 2003 12:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Friday, 20 June 2003 13:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil, Friday, 20 June 2003 13:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jon Williams (ex machina), Friday, 20 June 2003 13:31 (twenty-two years ago)
if i'd finished "Art and Lies" it would have qualified for this thread. pretentious batshit.
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 20 June 2003 23:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Saturday, 21 June 2003 00:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. Ron, Saturday, 21 June 2003 00:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― jack cole (jackcole), Saturday, 21 June 2003 00:47 (twenty-two years ago)
I thought I posted this before but maybe it was another thread, but "wintering: a novel of sylvian plath" by, uh, whoever the fuck wrote it. I actually didn't read this, my wife did, but I felt as though I suffered through it since she kept reading the most offensively pretentious parts out loud to me just for reassurance that it was crap. As if the title (a novel "of"? oh please) wasn't clue enough.
The worst book I ever read was Charlotte Temple by Susanna Rowson, one of the first american novels. Cheesy crap.
― anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Saturday, 21 June 2003 00:58 (twenty-two years ago)
i have read this book, it is all of which he speaks and more good god no really it's awful no really back off, hands raised you're doing this for yourselves.On a lit tip I've never read a heaney anthology without wanting to shake him by the lapels and scream LET ME GUESS, THIS POEM'S ABOUT THE FUCKING TROUBLES, ISN'T IT?Heaney: No, it's about frogsMe: (taps big stick pointedly)]Heaney: No really, it's about the troubles you see the frogs are grenades waiting to be detonated by the struggle and oh god I only have one key and that's e minor isn't it. But, you see, frogs, struggles. It's about frogs, really. Frogs.
― Matt (Matt), Saturday, 21 June 2003 01:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Saturday, 21 June 2003 01:57 (twenty-two years ago)
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41E15JK99SL._AA240_.jpg
His space operas are trashy fun, though.
― chap, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 18:18 (seventeen years ago)
Ayn Rand for the win for me
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 18:26 (seventeen years ago)
("The Fountainhead")
The Good Soldier -- Ford Madox Ford
― remy bean, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 18:28 (seventeen years ago)
(and I adore the modernists)
― remy bean, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 18:29 (seventeen years ago)
A friend of mine down here just recently admitted to loving Atlas Shrugged, reading it all the way through the end. I heaved a big sigh to myself.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 18:30 (seventeen years ago)
A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius. Ugh. Hey, could you dumb that down a little--oh, and add some smarm, please. Thanks. I'll go gouge out my eyes now. -- adam (adam), Saturday, 14 June 2003 22:01 (4 years ago) Link
Mark Danielewski - House of Leaves -- miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Sunday, 15 June 2003 18:44 (4 years ago) Link
both these otm
― andrew m., Wednesday, 16 January 2008 18:58 (seventeen years ago)
glamorama
― omar little, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 19:01 (seventeen years ago)
Mansfield Park.
― jim, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 19:09 (seventeen years ago)
http://nedraggett.wordpress.com/2007/11/26/nanowrimo-and-the-torments-of-his-dreams-in-reflection/
― and what, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 19:34 (seventeen years ago)
Oh my god I hate Mansfield Park so much, and it's not even the worst book I've ever read because I've read a lot of crap.
― Nicole, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 19:36 (seventeen years ago)
maybe The Hotel New Hampshire
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 19:50 (seventeen years ago)
tie
Fugitive Pieces by Anne Michaels Sweet Hereafter by Russell Banks
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 19:51 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.amazon.com/Freaky-Dancin-Bez/dp/0330481975/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1200513598&sr=8-1
― sexyDancer, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 20:00 (seventeen years ago)
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41Y0RDM5F6L._SS500_.jpg
― nate woolls, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 20:07 (seventeen years ago)
Feast of Love by Charles Baxter for a Contemporary American Fiction course. Unbearable.
― lou, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 20:07 (seventeen years ago)
I still think I hate Bridget Jones the most, not only because it is awful on its own terms but also because it has spawned so much irritating chick lit.
― Nicole, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 20:08 (seventeen years ago)
No wait, fucking MotherKind by Jayne Anne Phillips for the same course. Except I don't think I could actually make it to the end for that one.
― lou, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 20:10 (seventeen years ago)
If you actually read all that, and what, you're a patient guy.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 20:21 (seventeen years ago)
the celestine prophecy
― the sir weeze, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 20:24 (seventeen years ago)
the bible
― pj, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 20:28 (seventeen years ago)
I have just read the wrongest scene in a fantasy book ever written.
a contender
― HI DERE, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 20:30 (seventeen years ago)
some crap by jean genet that my "bohemian" friend lent me
― pj, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 20:33 (seventeen years ago)
a separate peace by john knowles
― Mr. Snrub, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:16 (seventeen years ago)
second vote for The Celestine Prophecy
― Sara R-C, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:35 (seventeen years ago)
Dune
― moley, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:38 (seventeen years ago)
Still hate The Fountainhead, but I think Interview with the Vampire was even worse. A Separate Peace was more a disappointment than an atrocity.
― Maria, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:44 (seventeen years ago)
whoever said A Passage to India upthread = batshit.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:44 (seventeen years ago)
A Passage to India is wonderful!
BTW, I read Interview with the Vampire out loud with a friend. All the way through, overnight. That's how addictively, hilariously awful it was.
― Maria, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:45 (seventeen years ago)
Dune def a contender, also Interview with the Vampire
OMG XPOST
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:47 (seventeen years ago)
Bad books by major writers should be its own category:
Saul Bellow - The Dean's December, Ravelstein D.H. Lawrence - The Plumed Serpent Ian McEwan - Amsterdam
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:49 (seventeen years ago)
I think it was Douglas Coupland's Shampoo Planet. When I was a kid, it was Dear Mr. Henshaw by Beverly Cleary. I wrote a lot of parodies of it for a few years. It started my general hatred for epistolary novels, which leads me to say the worst book might be Pamela, but it is 1. too grueling an ordeal to not finish with some pride of at least having tackled the damn thing and 2. completely bonkers, unlike the other two.
Others include The Book of Mormon and even worse, the early Mormon prophecy & rule compendium The Doctrine and Covenants, and channeled-entity book Seth Speaks.
― Abbott, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:49 (seventeen years ago)
The first three Dune books aren't so bad, but the last three are some of the most terrible things ever written.
― Camrock, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:52 (seventeen years ago)
Yes Camrock, such was my perseverance I made it all the way to the fourth, and they just got worse and worse. Why did I do it? To this day I do not know. I was a stubborn 14 year old, I suppose, determined to finish what I'd started. To be fair, I think there were vignettes in each of the books that were extremely powerful, and that kept me going through the long plains of dust in between.
― moley, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:54 (seventeen years ago)
I was in the same boat moley, it was more of an honor thing than an enjoyment thing. Like Fear Factor but with dead brain cells.
― Camrock, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:56 (seventeen years ago)
Wild Animus. Good grief what a POS. Some of you SF people might remember all these kids giving it away free on street corners around Fall '04 (yeah I have no idea). I was out there for work and had some down time, but couldn't really leave the office. Finally got bored enough to actually read it. It was basically some dot com cowboy's hippie "search for truth" wet dream. From what I remember. Ugh.
― will, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:57 (seventeen years ago)
There was this children's book I read when I was about 11 that started off excellently but very quickly degenerated into dull bollocks - at the outset it looked like it was going to be an enjoyably silly, light-hearted fantasy, about these kids who were planning to dig an immense maze of secret tunnels under their local park. After reading the first couple of pages in the library, I checked it out and excitedly took it home to continue reading.
HAHAHAHAHA this is like my experience w/a third of the books I read growing up!
― Abbott, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:57 (seventeen years ago)
I read some book as a kid that had some kids trying to exorcise a cat that REALLY SCARED me. Plus it was really boring and grim. I think it was called The Witches of Worm (Worm was the cat IIRC).
― Abbott, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:58 (seventeen years ago)
Jonathan Livingston Seagull. I feel sad admitting I've even read it.
OMG this is so fucking true.
― Abbott, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 21:59 (seventeen years ago)
Oh, A Child Called It might be included here. I mean, the kid had a sad life and described it well. But 1. I think it makes people think child abuse is only like really "child abuse" if it entails starving your son and then essentially trying to gas him to death and forcing him to eat dog food, when it is usually a lot more (comparatively) subtle but still problematic and 2. Its popularity seemed to have the same appeal as a true crime novel, this really voyeuristic thing that does not affect change but is kind of like rotten.com for the Oprah set. That is a thing that makes me uncomfortable about modern society.
― Abbott, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 22:05 (seventeen years ago)
i liked the good soldier by ford but it was kind of pointless. it has some good prose, though.
― elan, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 22:08 (seventeen years ago)
Don't laugh at me but my mum wanted 'Dead Famous' by Ben Elton for Christmas one year so I got it and read it before I gave it to her, and my God, I knew Elton has gone to the polar opposite of 'funny' and I thought I had read some bad books in my time, but this still managed to shock and astound me as to its sheer pointless crap bollocks piece of shit existence. AGRHGHRGHHH.
― Not the real Village People, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 22:15 (seventeen years ago)
i tried starting to read Dune over the weekend and i could NOT do it
the 10 page glossary that started the book was pretty discouraging, for one
― the sir weeze, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 22:17 (seventeen years ago)
Memoria de mis putas tristes.
Oh, Gabopaws.
― jim, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 22:17 (seventeen years ago)
Mr Nice by Howard Marks - if you can't sell weed properly your an idiot Stoned by Andrew Loog Oldham - nice pants, twat
― badg, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 22:22 (seventeen years ago)
sorry trousers
your an idiot
Nobodys perfect.
― jim, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 22:25 (seventeen years ago)
I wanted to say "The Celestine Prophecy", but I stopped with about 40 pages left. I just couldn't handle it. I should finish it, just out of spite.
― j-rock, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 22:42 (seventeen years ago)
IIRC, it got even more patently ridiculous and bad toward the end. Utter, utter nonsense. And worse: badly written utter nonsense.
― Sara R-C, Wednesday, 16 January 2008 23:11 (seventeen years ago)
Usually my answer to this is Ishmael by Daniel Quinn - essays disguised as a crap novel about a talking gorilla, but it's been several years since I read it and I can't even remember what his stupid stupid arguments were.
The worst book I've read recently, or at least the one that left the worst taste in my mouth, was Youth by J. M. Coetzee. Just seemed like ugliness without a point.
Why do you hate The Good Soldier, remy?
― clotpoll, Thursday, 17 January 2008 00:08 (seventeen years ago)
Oh, I just found the florid prose offputting, and the payoff poor compensation for the purpleness of the style.
― remy bean, Thursday, 17 January 2008 00:17 (seventeen years ago)
bahahahaha someone was trying to get me to read Ishmael bcz it was 'mindblowing' (bad sign) and I successfully put it off. I knew it would be some new agey claptrap, but 2/3 of the reason I wanted not to was I hate gorillas so, so much.
― Abbott, Thursday, 17 January 2008 00:21 (seventeen years ago)
I liked Ishmael when I was seventeen. It seemed, um, profound. If that isn't reason enough to put somebody off, I don't know what is.
― remy bean, Thursday, 17 January 2008 00:22 (seventeen years ago)
Other good books I hate: Vanity Fair, Lord Jim
― remy bean, Thursday, 17 January 2008 00:23 (seventeen years ago)
For school: Sexual Abuse of Males. It's a textbook, the author is good, but the subject matter is quite grim. Not for school: A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius (threw it across the room, then returned it) and Superstud by Paul Feig. Feig gets credit for Freaks and Geeks, but this was really not a good book.
― miryam, Thursday, 17 January 2008 00:41 (seventeen years ago)
Worst in the past few years by generally good writers are Shipwreck by Louis Begley and The Book of Illusions by Paul Auster.
― Eazy, Thursday, 17 January 2008 00:45 (seventeen years ago)
Hannibal by Thomas Harris. Laughably silly and fitfully boring with it.
― Duane Barry, Thursday, 17 January 2008 01:03 (seventeen years ago)
Dune is awesome, but you kind of have to have the "nerd gene" to enjoy it
― latebloomer, Thursday, 17 January 2008 01:08 (seventeen years ago)
If you want to nominate Dune you need to have never read any comics or Stephen King books, for consistency.
― The blue-green world is drenched with horse gore, Thursday, 17 January 2008 01:11 (seventeen years ago)
Now I kind of want to read Ishmael.
― Abbott, Thursday, 17 January 2008 01:21 (seventeen years ago)
As a kid, I would read pretty much anything I could get my hands on. Unfortunately this meant that I read, at one point, a novelization of The Last Action Hero
― S-, Thursday, 17 January 2008 01:24 (seventeen years ago)
I can't believe noone's mentioned The Da Vinci Code. Was I the only one dumb enough to read that the whole way through?
― adamj, Thursday, 17 January 2008 01:47 (seventeen years ago)
Hahaha, me too S, which is why I read a novelization of "Hook" and my dad's self-help books as "Seven Habits..." and "Never Be Nervous Again."
― Abbott, Thursday, 17 January 2008 01:53 (seventeen years ago)
'killer on the road' aka 'silent terror' by james ellroy is also a contender - totally unpleasant even by the unpleasant standards of "first-person serial killer fiction". like "american psycho" minus the satire and vague big statements in its place. added bonus: unintentional hilarity when our serial killer narrator meets up with another like-minded psycho!
― omar little, Thursday, 17 January 2008 01:54 (seventeen years ago)
I made it all the way to the end of E.E. "Doc" Smith's Lensman series a decade or two back. Seven books of it! What the hell was I thinking?
― Matt #2, Thursday, 17 January 2008 03:08 (seventeen years ago)
heartbreaking work might be it
― Hurting 2, Thursday, 17 January 2008 05:20 (seventeen years ago)
Oh god YES. What a crap book. First half was tolerable but the rest was utter shite.
― stevienixed, Thursday, 17 January 2008 05:25 (seventeen years ago)
my ex-girlfriend's dad ('uncle tom') enthused to me about hannibal during a three hour car trip and then gave me a special hardcover edition for christmas that i had to read and pretend i loved.
― remy bean, Thursday, 17 January 2008 05:30 (seventeen years ago)
Can I nominate the Harry Potter series as if it was a single book, or do I have to pick one?
― Forest Pines Mk2, Thursday, 17 January 2008 07:13 (seventeen years ago)
if those are the worst, you really should read more
― remy bean, Thursday, 17 January 2008 07:14 (seventeen years ago)
I can't believe noone's mentioned The Da Vinci Code Alchemist. Was I the only one dumb enough to read that the whole way through?
thankfully it was short.
others would be: Douglas Copeland - Girlfriend in a Coma Arthur Herzog - IQ 83 Margaret Atwood - Oryx and Crake The Bell Jar Life of Pi
i liked mansfield park
― negotiable, Thursday, 17 January 2008 07:41 (seventeen years ago)
Holiday read, i.e. nothing else left to (other book being read by g/f)
Some book about someone who's best friend was a punk, became a TV chef, was totally obnoxious,umm... I have binned the title in my mind. The only realistic bit was when the first guy's wife had a baby andnever swore once during the birth (against type),but just kept saying "gosh" and "oh my" sort of stuff.
Not good enough for "Everything's a pound" clearance.
― Mark G, Thursday, 17 January 2008 08:44 (seventeen years ago)
The Bell Jar
:-((( That's like... depressing.
― stevienixed, Thursday, 17 January 2008 08:49 (seventeen years ago)
High Fidelity by Beezlebub Hornby.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Thursday, 17 January 2008 08:51 (seventeen years ago)
Life of Pi seconded. Saul Bellow seconded, but for Augie March - too slow and boring,though intresting.
there are more
― Zeno, Thursday, 17 January 2008 09:00 (seventeen years ago)
Kahlil Gibran's "The Prophet". File next to "The Alchemist" and "Jonathan Livingston Seagull".
― Øystein, Thursday, 17 January 2008 09:08 (seventeen years ago)
> 'Dead Famous' by Ben Elton
Popcorn was terrible, topical satire, natural born killers vs big brother. very cheap cash-in.
'Well Remembered Days: Eoin O'Cellaigh's Memoirs of a Twentieth-century Irish Catholic' by Arthur Mathews was also terrible. father ted writer, recommended by john peel. terrible.
― koogs, Thursday, 17 January 2008 09:45 (seventeen years ago)
Life's waaaaay too short to be reading shitty books.
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 17 January 2008 10:31 (seventeen years ago)
Lies.
― Øystein, Thursday, 17 January 2008 10:34 (seventeen years ago)
I kinda like the Seagull book and the bits of Kahlil Gibran that I've read. It's the peeps that take them seriously that drag 'em down.
― Noodle Vague, Thursday, 17 January 2008 10:46 (seventeen years ago)
So many to chose from, mostly read at University:
** I read one of JF Cooper's Deerslayer books (Last of the Mohicans, I think) for my American Literature course at Sussex University. Turgid prose, horrible politics, awful.
** Popcorn, obviously (also read for a University course, on "The Popular Thriller"). And I'd better add LA Confidential (gibberish) and Hound of the Baskervilles (dull), from the same course.
** EVERY FUCKING NOVEL BY ALICE WALKER (except The Color Purple, which's ok), once again read for my American Lit final year thesis. (We had the choice of Walker or Hemingway for our final year thesis. I chose Walker 'cause she's marginally less dull.)
― Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 17 January 2008 12:10 (seventeen years ago)
Mayor of Casterbridge
― Dom Passantino, Thursday, 17 January 2008 12:10 (seventeen years ago)
Either 'A Store is Born' by Jasper Carrot or 'Saturday' by Ian McEwan. I resent the latter more.
― Pete W, Thursday, 17 January 2008 12:28 (seventeen years ago)
Saul Bellow seconded, but for Augie March - too slow and boring,though intresting.
wau
― G00blar, Thursday, 17 January 2008 13:02 (seventeen years ago)
i.e. u mad
― G00blar, Thursday, 17 January 2008 13:04 (seventeen years ago)
Popcorn is okay. Not outstanding of course, but a fun read. I mean, what standards are you guys using?
― stevienixed, Thursday, 17 January 2008 13:12 (seventeen years ago)
http://assets4.pitchforkmedia.com/images/image/16839.standards.gif
― Dingbod Kesterson, Thursday, 17 January 2008 13:13 (seventeen years ago)
London Fields
― Michael B, Thursday, 17 January 2008 13:21 (seventeen years ago)
I was assigned The Mayor of Casterbridge to read for GCSEs at one school, for A-Levels at another, and then once more at University for luck. I actually kind of enjoyed it the final time 'round.
Literally "dying of shame" in a nineteenth century novel = quite classic.
― Chuck_Tatum, Thursday, 17 January 2008 13:56 (seventeen years ago)
Hardy is mad classic you fules.
― The blue-green world is drenched with horse gore, Thursday, 17 January 2008 14:07 (seventeen years ago)
wow. what *specifically* is bad about 'a heartbreaking work...' ?
― pisces, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:01 (seventeen years ago)
It's a bag of shite?
― The blue-green world is drenched with horse gore, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:02 (seventeen years ago)
good post, very informative^^^
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:04 (seventeen years ago)
I feel I engaged with the work.
― The blue-green world is drenched with horse gore, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:07 (seventeen years ago)
Nothing wrong with making things up per se - see e.g. "Florence"'s Life Of Thomas Hardy - but you have to be good and consistent at it. Unfortunately Mr Eggers' writings are credibility-tickling without any compensatory rib-tickling component.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:10 (seventeen years ago)
The first thing that comes to mind is Asimov's Murder at the ABA, but the real answer is probably a few dozen of the Doc Savage books I used to be nuts about.
― Rock Hardy, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:10 (seventeen years ago)
JOSEPH ANDREWS henry fielding.
'A most bawdy encounter in which Mr Smythe and the tavern owner...' oh get fucked.
― pisces, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:15 (seventeen years ago)
You rep for Dave Cunting Eggers and dis Henry Fielding?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
― The blue-green world is drenched with horse gore, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:16 (seventeen years ago)
The Crimson Petal and the White, I Was Dora Suarez, and NYC Babylon.
― tokyo rosemary, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:17 (seventeen years ago)
Philip Roth's Plot Against America. I like some of his other books quite a bit, especially Patrimony, but seriously, that was such a goddamn waste of time.
― Simon H., Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:21 (seventeen years ago)
I quite liked You Shall Know Our Velocity. Never read Heartbreaking Work though. I don't know what my answer to this would be. Something by Julian Barnes or Ian McEwan maybe.
― DavidM, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:28 (seventeen years ago)
I found the extended intro with all the footnotes and stuff in Heartbreaking Work pretty funny, but the rest was wank.
― chap, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:29 (seventeen years ago)
no no ive never read eggers i were just asking what the problem with it was as ive read nothing but waffle about how good it is.
― pisces, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:41 (seventeen years ago)
i've never read anything decent about why people don't like it except LOL ITS BLOODY SHITE, ETC
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:43 (seventeen years ago)
For a start he should leave the internal self-dialogue stuff to Hemingway.
― Dingbod Kesterson, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:52 (seventeen years ago)
It's a book for people who don't like books!
― The blue-green world is drenched with horse gore, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:57 (seventeen years ago)
OMG Joseph Andrews is my favorite novel that isn't sci-fi or by Daniel Pinkwater. I mean it is way fucking good and funny. IMO
― Abbott, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:57 (seventeen years ago)
^^^ Correct
― The blue-green world is drenched with horse gore, Thursday, 17 January 2008 16:58 (seventeen years ago)
i don't finish bad books
― n/a, Thursday, 17 January 2008 17:15 (seventeen years ago)
I have to finish a book, no matter how bad it is. I just have this sick curiosity as to how it is going to turn out that I can't ignore even if the book is going to bore and/or annoy me.
― Nicole, Thursday, 17 January 2008 17:26 (seventeen years ago)
i have not, nor do i ever hope to surpass Digger by Joseph Flynn
― mookieproof, Monday, 2 November 2015 06:45 (nine years ago)
I've learned not to read bad books to the end, but it's hard not to when it was enthusiastically pressed upon you by a friend, or even worse, given as a gift with a similarly enthusiastic endorsement.
Thinking back to the era when this happened to me more often, I recall having finished Bridges of Madison County and Love Story. They were plenty bad. I have probably blocked all memory of the actual worst book from my mind.
― Aimless, Monday, 2 November 2015 17:15 (nine years ago)
when i was about 15 my sister had some book written by the actor ethan hawke, about a guy who has a steamy affair with some artist he meets and then it ends. it was terrible. i can't be sure the main character was an actor called like elton hank, it may have been marginally less glaring than that, but not much.
it had a lot of discussion of how hot it is in texas which i suppose was meant to resonate with all the sex.
― doing my Objectives, handling some intense stuff (LocalGarda), Monday, 2 November 2015 17:17 (nine years ago)
I limped through DeLillo's Underworld.
― The burrito of ennui (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 2 November 2015 17:22 (nine years ago)
Thought you were gonna go with Ada.
― Memes of the Pwn Age (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 2 November 2015 17:35 (nine years ago)
college g/f made me read "A Tree Grows in Brooklyn" so, that
most terrible books I will put down before I get to the end cuz c'mon why bother
― Οὖτις, Monday, 2 November 2015 17:38 (nine years ago)