Wimbledon 2003

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Oh, I know it's only day two of qualifying, but the draw's been made so we're officially off and running in an amateur punditry sense.

Tim(id)* gets a 19-place boost from the seeding committee (probably fair enough), but, apart from Corretja (surely only a threat if the courts are playing unnaturally slow), he's also landed a spot in the easiest quarter. Hmmm. It looks like Grosjean again in the QF, but Seb's got a brutal section to deal with: Arthurs, Blake, Enqvist, Rosset, Sargsian, Ferrero.

(* - perhaps the BBC shouldn't have chosen intimidation and mental strength as the theme for their trailers, sappy monotone Timmy is about as menacing as Annabel Croft at her most apologetic).

Top matches in men's R1: Bandy vs former semi-finalist Voltchkov (how far can one man fall in the rankings in one afternoon?), Zabaleta vs Scud. Looming in R2: Llandudno vs Kreakij. I've said it before, but Hewitt is Jim Courier de nos jours. People are starting to work out how to play him, and as soon as his intensity dims, he'll be #45 in the world and a reserve in the Aussie Davis Cup team. Might not happen for another year, but it will happen.

Top matches in women's R1: Capriati vs Casanova, Coetzer vs Mad Dally, Chandra R vs former French champ Iva Majoli.

Come on, Roger!

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 13:44 (twenty-two years ago)

I haven't checked out the draw yet. Totally agree with you about Hewitt, though; his number is coming up QUICKLY.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 13:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Hewitt is Jim Courier de nos jours

Ouch, indeed.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 13:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Is Henman's v/o on the trailer *supposed* to be ominously dull and ineffectual?

the pinefox, Tuesday, 17 June 2003 13:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Is Henman's v/o on the trailer *supposed* to be ominously dull and ineffectual?

Perhaps, it is. He should be saying something like, "Ooh, you're going to have a stretch a bit to reach my volleys" or "My first serve percentage has a tendency to rise as matches go on, so fear that" or "You have literally no idea how cross I can get when my backhand isn't working. Grrr."

Pathetic. He'll probably win it now.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 14:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm wondering if anyone will even bother to pretend that Timmy has a chance of winning this year... still, I'm sure they will, and I'm sure he'll crash out in the semis again as always

Wimbledon 2001 - best Wimbledon ever?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 14:49 (twenty-two years ago)

The world #29 reaching the semis of a grand slam = quite an achievement, but, yes, it would just seem like another crushing failure. That's the thing about Timbo - caught between expectation (a Brit's gonna win Wimbledon!) and reality (he's as good as Tim Mayotte or Cedric Pioline at their best), or between the former expectation and the current, prevailing expectation (he'll fall at the penultimate hurdle again, what a loser!).

He hasn't failed to realise his potential, I think he's partially exceeded it. Being the best British-born player in a generation still doesn't make him a world-beater. 1998 was his best shot: beating reigning GS champs Korda and Rafter en route to a genuinely competitive match with Sampras in supreme form.

2001 was great, yes - you can't really beat it when the last three men's matches all go to the wire. 1992, too, was pretty extraordinary.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 15:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Best thread ever!

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I hate Timmeh and want to see him out before the quarters.

Also Anna Kournikova is out - ALREADY - still it'll save the woman her usual embarrassment of being trounced by a Spanish 15-year-old in the first round

j0e (j0e), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 18:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Tim may have the personality of a grapefruit and his feeble post-point-winning fist-pump may make you want to chin him, but ..yeah, he really is way too maligned for what really is over rather than under achievement. Sure, he hasn't won it, but not a lot of folks get to our semis and lose out to the eventual winner - each time a man playing at his peak - every time. The Brit tabloids have got a lot to answer for when they slam him. I grew up in the era when first John Lloyd and then Jeremy Bates getting to the third round and maybe beating a seed on the way (cf Bates-Chang in 90whatever) was a thing to shout about.

darren (darren), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 20:44 (twenty-two years ago)

our semis - um, make that FOUR semis. I may be a Brit but I don't feel THAT strongly about Wimbledon !

darren (darren), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 20:45 (twenty-two years ago)

And hey - what about Elena Baltacha and Anne Keown-thapong, eh ? Anyone think the Brit chicks have any chance of ever making it ? Footydaughter has got Dokic hasn't she ? Poor lass. Then again she's been riddled with every ailment under the sun since the Coetzer match last year. She wouldn't be out of place in the Spurs treatment room !

darren (darren), Tuesday, 17 June 2003 20:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I like Elena, she has a certain grit on court; I can only hope her struggle through illness has given her a iron-clad core, so we have none of the self-deprecating mimsy she displayed before losing to Victoria Wine last year. Hopefully her dad has been showing her videos of his crunching tackles on Socrates and Falcao to gee her up.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 08:37 (twenty-two years ago)

I only watch tennis once a year, has Sampras retired then?

Actually, I can't remember whether or not he played last year, but hey, there was a World Cup on.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 08:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I am loving this thread, but am having a certain amount of trouble with Steady Mike's nicknames. Victoria Wine? Virginia Wade maybe? Is there a glossary?

I may be going to Wimbledon next Tuesday, and will Report Back if I do.

Mark C (Mark C), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 09:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Sampras hasn't formally retired, but after winning the US Open last year (to everyone's astonishment), I don't think he's played a competitive match. He's done enough, I guess: 14 grand slams. He lost to George Bastl in R2 last year at Wimbledon.

Mark C: explaining them takes the fun out of it, but Victoria Wine = Liquorsaver = Likhvotseva. Lady P and I are also planning a post-5pm grounds visit, poss next Thursday.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 09:45 (twenty-two years ago)

G'day again from the twice-yearly tennis watcher! In the world of tennis, whenever there is somethin' goin' on, you do know what it is, don't you Mister Jones (a Dylan reference)? Looking forward to trading commentary and doing the Duelling Nicknames thread all over again over the next couple of weeks.

Word from the Anti-Podes is that the Leyt who Greyts can look forward to spending at least the second half of week two sightseeing and working on his golf this time round, although there is still a good chance his slightly better-looking half won't be available to caddy for him.

Fred Nerk, Wednesday, 18 June 2003 10:30 (twenty-two years ago)

I've always fancied going to the qualifying tournament in Roehampton - I think it's free to get in and you're sure to see some fantastic tennis from genuinely desperate players.

Like Gorka Fraile, a 25-year-old Spaniard, whose career prize money amounts to $77k and who has an all-time win/loss record on the main tour of 1/1 (he went out in R1), or American Jack Brasington, who didn't turn pro until he was 24 and surely has some other form of income even now, or veteran Big Dick Norman, the six foot eight Belgian who wasted 12 break points vs Hewitt in the final set at Queen's last week, destined forever to be hovering on the fringe of the big party with a world ranking of 111. Or Marie-Eve Pelletier, a 13-11 deciding set loser in the opening round of the women's event, who'll be kicking herself all the way back to Quebec. Severine Beltrame, Aniko Kapros, Gisela Dulko... where will they be next week?

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 13:44 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd be up for going to qualifying this Friday, Mike. Is it still on? I am very local, too, we could walk there from my house with Pimms.

Mark C (Mark C), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 14:16 (twenty-two years ago)

That sounds marvellous, Mark, but I'm just too flaming busy...

I think you should take your racket just in case.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 14:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Hee, just like I take my boots when I go to see AFC Wimbledon?

Shame though. Perhaps next year?

Mark C (Mark C), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 15:51 (twenty-two years ago)

"They mean to win Wimbledon"

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 15:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Perhaps instead, Mike, we could go to the "Wimbledon" film when it comes out and I can count the number of times you beat your forehead at the factual innacuracies...

Mark C (Mark C), Wednesday, 18 June 2003 16:00 (twenty-two years ago)

What about the forthcoming TARANTINO TRILOGY about THE PREMIERSHIP???

the pinefox, Wednesday, 18 June 2003 17:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Perhaps instead, Mike, we could go to the "Wimbledon" film when it comes out and I can count the number of times you beat your forehead at the factual innacuracies...

Same cinematographer as Se7en and Delicatessen, so he should capture the incessant rain and gloom just right. Is Kirsten Dunst playing in it, or just the love (DO YOU SEE) interest?

It can't possibly be as good as Players from 1979, with Ali McGraw, the late Dean Paul Martin and Steven Guttenberg. Guillermo Vilas wins the title in that one (spoiler, sorry).

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 19 June 2003 10:00 (twenty-two years ago)

They showed 'The Official Wimbledon 2002 Film' the other afternoon. Unfortunately I was too flaming busy, but I bet it was good if you like 'slower motion'.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 19 June 2003 20:19 (twenty-two years ago)

I like the official films; a DVD of the 1988 and 1992 tournaments would be, like, the best thing evah, natch.

My players of the day (or, perhaps, yesterday) are:

Todd Larkham - 29-year-old Aussie whose career earnings are no more than mine would be in this job if I stuck at it for another 9 years, a ranking best of #168 for singles *and* doubles, but who has scrapped and scrambled his way into the main draw by way of a 5-set win over Harel Levy in Roehampton... and now faces James Blake.

Talking of On The Buses, Jim's unsister Maureen Blake, the Canadian veteran, has also edged a final round qualifier for a spot in the Merton Mains. She gave Venus a torrid time last year; surely worth another run to the last 32, where Chandra Rubin will clip her ticket.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 20 June 2003 12:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Heh-heh.

"Ticket".

the pinefox, Friday, 20 June 2003 13:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Ok, eve of event predictions.

Men's QF:

Bjorkman-Ancic
Federer-Schalken
Henman-Blake
Arazi-Agassi

Greg R beats Roddick in their 2nd round clash (50 aces between them and a new world record serve), but falls to Ancic in the last 16. Lleyton loses to Bjorkman from two sets up in R4. Malisse-Draper in R3 is the longest men's match: Xavier wins it 15-13 in the 5th, then flops miserably vs Andre in the next round.

Women's QF:

S Williams-Myskina
Henin-Kuznetsova
Davenport-V Williams
Rubin-Sugiyama

Kim C has a nightmare v Pistolesi in R3 and slumps out; Venus given hellacious scare by Indonesia's teenage sensation Widjaja in same round but survives.

Can't say who'll win either event, though.

In the real world, you may or may not be aware that Kreaky, TonyLeMauresmo and Alex Corretjaja have pulled out. It's a bit of a shame.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Sunday, 22 June 2003 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Damn the championships starting tomorrow, the start of which will probably be the busiest fortnight of my life

I'll be lucky if I get the chance to say "doesn't she look mannish?" at Pam Shriver during the highlights programme

j0e (j0e), Sunday, 22 June 2003 16:12 (twenty-two years ago)

damn my naggy syntax too. tomorrow heralds the start of possibly my busiest fortnight ever

j0e (j0e), Sunday, 22 June 2003 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)

is what I meant to ssay

j0e (j0e), Sunday, 22 June 2003 16:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Don't worry, j0e, I confused Mo Blake with Mo Drake above and made such a fool of myself the thread plummeted off the New Answers page for 24 hours.

I find myself with stacks of annual leave owed to me, but little opportunity to take much of it for Wimbledon-watching due to everyone in our department having the same idea. I've left it a bit late to strategically chum up to the afternoon receptionist downstairs in an effort to steer her away from her daytime soaps, allowing us the occasional sneaky peak at the odd tie-breaker or two.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Sunday, 22 June 2003 17:22 (twenty-two years ago)

I've taken the day off and I've got both tellies on, so you can stick your interactive red button up your arse.

The Jones Kiss of Death is about to strike on court six: projected quarter-finalist Mario Ancic already two sets down to somebody called Nadal. Bugger. Roddick-Sanguinetti is a very watchable affair, A-Rod (what *does* that mean, btw?) playing with some flair to season the powerstrokes, Davide S a strikingly handsome greying chap, with more fire in his veins than his name suggests. The Roddick speedometer has touched 141mph so far today.

The Croat giant (he's 6'10"!) facing the Defending Ball of Hate seems to have got his act together - he conceded his serve three times in the opening set, on each occasion with a double fault. The Centre Court crowd looked away and shuffled its feet.

Ooh, ooh, Lleland a mini-break down in the 2nd t/b...

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 23 June 2003 12:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Llanrwst drops the second set to Jeff Goldblum *and* goes a break down in the 3rd... they're calling this the Little and Large Show - in a decaying semi in Sale, a middle-aged man in a Man City top is swearing into his mobile, "Syd? Syd? Did you hear what they just friggin' said?"

Lleylo's vein is *this* far out of his forehead now.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 23 June 2003 12:40 (twenty-two years ago)

And a proper break down in the 3rd! We can but hope...

I'm taking a day off too (along with all the other days off unemployment affords me) and I'm very much enjoying it. When I lived with my parents we would be besieged by thousands of tennis tourists (and most of them did seem to be foreign) for a fortnight a year - they live just next to Southfields station. I kind of miss the bustle and the feeling of smugness that I actually *lived* there and had a perfectly good drive to park in, hahaha. I was less pleased when I was going out of an evening and had to queue behind 2,000 to get the tube.

Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 23 June 2003 12:43 (twenty-two years ago)

A-Rod would be a reference to a basball player, MJ, his name is [something beginning with A] Rodriguez (i think). also i think he is a fast thrower, someone who knows about baseball to thread pls...

there was an article in the observer yesterday where b*ris b*cker said he thought federer might win, haha, he's your best mate jonesy :)

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Monday, 23 June 2003 13:04 (twenty-two years ago)

My loathing for BB has softened into a mild repulsion now he's stopped playing the pro tour, but he managed to utterly ruin Queen's as a spectacle by lumbering onto court on the last day to beat Edberg in a one-set exhibition. Edberg double-faulted on match point. Plus ca change.

As for me as Mr Predicto, I'm typing this from inside the paper bag I got into last year, and the imminent demise of Ancic means I have little chance of immediate escape.

Is Hewitt going out here or WOT?

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 23 June 2003 13:19 (twenty-two years ago)

K-BLIMEY, Karlovic breaks Hewitt and is about to serve for the match!

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 23 June 2003 13:26 (twenty-two years ago)

DOWN WITH HEWITT!!!!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 23 June 2003 13:28 (twenty-two years ago)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

SUCK IT YOU (mildly) RACIST BASTARD!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 23 June 2003 13:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Incredible - only the second time the defending men's champion has fallen at the first hurdle (other: Carlos Santana, undone by a particularly tricky solo in '67). Karlovic playing serve-volley as well as anyone currently in the men's game. Brings back warm memories of Peter Doohan flooring Copperhead in '87.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 23 June 2003 13:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Karlovic was a black-hole out there. Amazing.

Cozen (Cozen), Monday, 23 June 2003 13:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh yes, Dan's ultimate tennis game -- Tardis Tennis.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 23 June 2003 13:52 (twenty-two years ago)

ARGH why does a concept so cool play so horrifically????!?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 23 June 2003 16:43 (twenty-two years ago)

The Jones Kiss of Death is about to strike on court six: projected quarter-finalist Mario Ancic already two sets
down to somebody called Nadal.

hey, mr jones, that is rafael nadal, a 16 year old from mallorca (nephew of miguel angel nadal, infamous football player from fc barcelona). don't miss this kid, he'll be up there soon.

and, hmm, the spanish tennis player from the 70's is manolo santana.
carlos santana is someone else ;-)

joan vich (joan vich), Monday, 23 June 2003 17:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Do you mean you didn't win a point, Dan? And how good does the Grainer/Derbyshire theme sound looped like that?

No adverse reaction from Mrs Lleyla - Kimsters followed the fallen champ on court and won 6-0 6-0 in fourteen seconds. Big Karlovic was just interviewed on the Beeb - the guy has a serious stammer but coped admirably with the horror of the Inverdale Q&A. I think I've watched a few too many episodes of Open All Hours recently - I needed to be jolted out of my comedy speech defect mindset.

Unluckiest of the day: Jon van Lottum, playing brilliantly for a set and a bit vs Kuerten on Centre, gets injured, retires, weeps in his chair at the calamity of it all.

Greg R through in three tight sets, looking good for a battle royale with Roddick on Wednesday. Easy for Venus, bit of a struggle for Lindsay.

(Joan: I know Manolo... "Grass is for the cows", etc)

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 23 June 2003 17:34 (twenty-two years ago)

ah, schadenfreude.

I'll be the provincial Americain here and say I expect big things from Roddick and (ok, not really) Dent.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 23 June 2003 21:47 (twenty-two years ago)

You do know Dent's already out, don't you?

Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 23 June 2003 22:11 (twenty-two years ago)

burn

gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 23 June 2003 23:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I well recall the Wimbledon exploit of 'Watcha' Doohan. Unforunately, the '87 'Becker Wrecker' remained famous only for that and for not having any relatives called Michael who were quite handy on a Harley.

If I was Pete I'd be cursing the late Andy Warhol for shortchanging my fame allowance by about 14 minutes.

Fred Nerk, Tuesday, 24 June 2003 12:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Hewitt's defeat was really extraordinary.

I may be developing a fancy for Roddick.

It's good to have Wimbledon around. I just wish I could actually watch it.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 24 June 2003 15:51 (twenty-two years ago)

henman wobbles as usual, but survives. drat.

zebedee (zebedee), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 15:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I heard about the 'man mountain' on the radio. prematch and they way they were talking it was almost as if the upset was expected. They didn't know much about him but they were just like 'COME ON - THIS GUY'S ENORMOUS'. Then the commentator guy felt obliged to point out that yes, he was huge but that his record in tennis matches was pretty poor.

Overawed presenters 1
Sensible tennis experts 0

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 16:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Overawed presenters 1
Sensible tennis experts 0

I know, I know - "See, the big tall man won! See?!"

Senor Delgado sneaked a set off AA; Jamie, who was once a Junior Prospect, but is now a Journeyman Pro, looks like a slightly crap Brit version of Agassi five or so years ago before Wilkinson Sword persuaded him to lose the beard. If Simon Pegg is Tufnell Park and Andre is Las Vegas, Jamie D is just off the west coast of Ireland.

Elena Baltacha went down fighting to Dock Itch; I think the LTA should step in on the subject of her ongoing mystery ailment and simply force one of her less talented compatriots to donate their liver to speed her recovery. Perhaps there could be a round-robin tournament to decide who gets to avoid the operating theatre.

Let's see how badly I'm doing on my predictions: Malisse, Arazi, Hewitt, Ancic all gone from the men's, Pistolesi out in the women's. I'm rubbish.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 17:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Sluitter's giving ol' AK47 a game, now. (Or, he was, when I came on the computer).

Cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 18:47 (twenty-two years ago)

And I thought I liked tennis!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 18:59 (twenty-two years ago)

(Dan, I recently bought Virtua Tennis 2 on the PS2 and it ist amazing!)

Cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 20:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Virtua Tennis 2 is DA BOMB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 21:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Back in the days when I had shitty jobs (as opposed to none) I always called in sick for Wimbledon. Genital depression. Severe Thrush Bombardment. There is nothing more beautiful than Wimbledon when you are jealous of people with gardens. Free grass on the telly, all afternoon long.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 22:20 (twenty-two years ago)

I am slightly longing for last year when I had no job and BBC interactive, enabling me to skip between the matches, ahhh heady days indeed.

I've seen about a set of tennis so far this year :o(

chris (chris), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 07:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Lunchtime snapshot on day three (and where is Mark C's Reporting Back?):

Mardy Fish two sets and a break to the good vs Gambill, Ai Sugiyama two points away from round three, Federer breaks Koubek on Centre just as he was in danger of dropping the first set (I hope this is a long-ish one, actually - I need 'ski vs 'dick to still be on when I get home), Paradorn getting battered by Mutis (oh, no, I meant to used that for Fish), and teensensationweneedtoknowabout Nadal currently outclassing Plucky LeeSpeakLikeAChilds. I wish I was watching Kuerten serving against Todd M on Court #1, just to see how The Mummy Returns.

Today I Am Taping Over: five episodes of This Life, second series.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 11:37 (twenty-two years ago)

NB for those of you less familiar with the game MARDY FISH is a real actual persons' real actual name, not one of MJ's nicknames...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 11:54 (twenty-two years ago)

How old is Todd Martin?

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 12:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Mutis Glaximus 2-1 sets plus break up against Srichaphan after resuming from rain delay. Only information given (and quite possibly known) by Oz commentators about Mutis so far: he's French.

Fred Nerk, Wednesday, 25 June 2003 13:29 (twenty-two years ago)

MyThai comes screaming back - just had a point for 5-3 in the fifth vs IT Sumo. Venus closing on victory after a tough first set vs Robotnik, which means I must dash home for the Richard Noble-Craig Breedlove Land Speed Record showdown following on Centre. ToddyBoy beat Gugamesh despite playing the whole match in an iron lung.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 14:10 (twenty-two years ago)

**How old is Todd Martin?**

About 33? We were talking in the pub last night about tennis stereotypes who are represented in every era. Todd M is the 'New England Ivy League nice guy'. Tim Mayotte was a predecessor.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 14:25 (twenty-two years ago)

And James Blake is the successor.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 14:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Something that makes me laugh when they talk about Henman is thinking about Mike's enduring assessment: "Like Tim Mayotte on a bad day" (or is it, *good* day?).

Latest genre of Henman-talk:

"John, do you think we talk too much about Henman?" "Yes, we talk about Tim far too much. It piles pressure on the guy. And tennis is all about pressure. Tim is out there on his own, and I don't care what you say, that makes for pressure. And we've just got so many hopes resting on this one guy, the pressure is massive. I don't care what you say." "But doesn't he seem to thrive on that pressure?" "Yes, he does. Tennis is all about pressure and how you handle it. I don't care what your name is, but if you're Tim Henman, walking out on Centre Court at Wimbledon, you've got to *take* that pressure... and *use* it!" "But maybe we're putting too much pressure on Tim by the way we talk about him every year?" "Yes, we are. The question is, what's Tim going to *do* with that pressure?"

[extracted from a 48-page document in similar vein]

the pinefox, Wednesday, 25 June 2003 14:38 (twenty-two years ago)


How old is Todd Martin?
My boyfriend said: Christ, are they showing the oldies tournament on telly now?!? I had to tell him that Todd's not that old. I still can't get over the fact Clijsters and Henin are doing so well and are referred to as "The Belgians."

nathalie (nathalie), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 14:42 (twenty-two years ago)

yes, let's call them "The Finns" instead

zebedee (zebedee), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 15:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Todd is 32. Agassi is 33.

Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 16:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Roddick has just beaten Rusedski 7-6 7-6 7-5 in a match with a very sour ending.

Greg snatches the initiative early in the 3rd with the frist break of the match; Roddick serves at 2-5 30/15 and a *fan* calls one of his groundstrokes long - Greg stops playing (dinks backhand over net and walks away), so does Andy (dinks backhand over net and looks puzzled) umpire awards point to Roddick. Greg explodes, goes to pieces, is broken to love and sets a new record for swearing on BBC2 before 6:30pm. Roddick breaks again and serves out with an ace.

And that's that.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 16:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Hantuchova - blimey!

Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 18:28 (twenty-two years ago)

That's what you get for not being good enough pfaffing about.

Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 18:30 (twenty-two years ago)

She kept looking like she was going to burst into tears whenever things stopped going her way. Cracking game, though.

ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 18:30 (twenty-two years ago)

A corker... Pam & I enjoyed making baby-waah sounds at Daniela as she gradually dissolved into stick-figure blubbing. Asagoe was a rock at 11-10 (104-minute final set!).

My dad's considered opinion on the Rusedski affair: "Big soft girl".

Ivo Watts-Karlovic is through to round three, pounding 29 aces in four sets vs Baccanello; Sjenga is still struggling in the half-light... 8:51pm and he's 4-3 up vs Lapentti in the fifth on court one.

Honorable mentions: Sluiter, who was fantastic vs Kafelnikov in another late-nighter yesterday that the BBC didn't stay with (Asagoe-Hantuchova seems to have prised The Way We Cooked (AKA Obvious Filler) out of the schedule) and (whisper it) Roger F, who was devastating vs Koubek this afternoon.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 18:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Bloody Federer - use other faces please!

Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 19:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Schalk'n'Vac through in five! Let the low countries reijoijce!

Probably off to SW19 after work tomorrow; fingers crossed for a swift Henman win (he's first on Centre vs Llodra) - that way all the flag-waving Last Night of the Pigging Proms filth can clear out by 4pm and leave lots of nice grounds space for people who aspire to something more than sitting on a hill in facepaint looking at a big telly.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 19:05 (twenty-two years ago)


What did Rudetski actually say then?

Gatinha (rwillmsen), Thursday, 26 June 2003 08:30 (twenty-two years ago)

The highlight for Ozzie watchers tonight just may be Wayne Arthurs' match against Sebastian Grosjean (or BigJohn as one bonehead FM DJ never grew out of calling him last Aust summer). 'Scargills', like Wally Masur before him, has been Australia's fifth or sixth best player for what seems like forever but if you asked anybody to name six Aussie tennis players it's unlikely he'd get mentioned.

Sebastian B. John may underestimate him, as most tend to, at his considerable peril. Unlike a few years ago, the point now remains alive even after the receiver manages to navigate that booming serve back over the net.

If Philippousis goes down tonight, the Big Poo will have to live with the ignominy of becoming the first Australian ever to lose at anything to someone called Cyril.

Fred Nerk, Thursday, 26 June 2003 10:23 (twenty-two years ago)

What did Rudetski actually say then?

i heard two wankers and a shit.

David_X (David_X), Thursday, 26 June 2003 10:56 (twenty-two years ago)

"i heard two wankers and a shit."

The two wankers would be Kafelnikov and Gimelstob and the shit is definitely Pat Cash.

Fred Nerk, Thursday, 26 June 2003 11:38 (twenty-two years ago)

If Philippousis goes down tonight, the Big Poo will have to live with the ignominy of becoming the first Australian ever to lose at anything to someone called Cyril.

Didn't Nick Tate lose his deposit in the '74 general election in Rochdale? Standing on some kind of Moonbase Alpha free-comlocks-for-the-kiddies ticket.

Rusedski: definitely some fuckings before moving, quite endearingly, on to the wankers. As British as bacon.

Capriati has just stomped on Mikael Ian for a place in round three. Timbo has just sneaked the first set vs Llodddddra and Nalbandit is showing what a freak I was for expecting him to be out 12 days earlier than last year by making short work of Andre Sa.

More comprehensive British defeats in the doubles, I see. They really are throwing themselves on the fire in an effort to clear a path for Hensy as the sole UK anything. Only one home player in either singles as of 7pm, first Wednesday - is this 1989 or something?

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 26 June 2003 12:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, no, Lee and Maclagan WON their doubles match! I got confused!

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 26 June 2003 12:44 (twenty-two years ago)

And so the Beeb ignores the real match of the day, that being the ding-dong between Rochus and Dupuis on court 7. Which I can't actually see, but the scoreline looks entertaining anyway.

Had a premonition last night, and on the way home am putting a fiver on Maria Sharapova to take the title.

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Thursday, 26 June 2003 12:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Dupuis levels to 6-6 in the fourth...

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Thursday, 26 June 2003 12:49 (twenty-two years ago)

But Rochus takes the tiebreak 7-5, and into a fifth set they go. I would put the radio on, but I can't honestly see the Beeb giving a stuff.

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Thursday, 26 June 2003 12:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Meanwhile Karolina "The Freudian" Sprem is 4-1 down against a Japanese person I have not heard of.

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Thursday, 26 June 2003 12:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Sprem pulls it back to 4-2. James Blake 2-0 down to Sargsian in the first. Jarkko Nieminen, who like all Finnish sporting types is presumably 'flying', might be blowing it against an Italian I am unfamiliar with.

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Thursday, 26 June 2003 12:59 (twenty-two years ago)

The Henperson mow two sets up.

Meanwhile, Princess Anastasia Myskina (10th seed) has just seen off 1 and 4 a compatriot whose given name is Lina and two of the multitudinous syllables in her family name are Krash and Rout.

Fred Nerk, Thursday, 26 June 2003 13:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Now it's Sargsian 4-1 over Blake.

Sexton needs to settle or he could drown in the wide Sargsian sea.

Fred Nerk, Thursday, 26 June 2003 13:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Blake's first set has just disappeared up the Khyber. Mark P a set up on Cyril S.

Mary Pierce has tipped out the 14th seed. She hasn't made it past Round 2 of too many slams recently. Well done Hawkeye.

Fred Nerk, Thursday, 26 June 2003 13:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Sseven is in trouble and no mistake, Sargis Major is making like Servalan all over his second serve. Sprem's opponent's name means 'more paper folding' in Japanese - and she's just made unfashionable luncheon meat out of KS.

Younes vs Massu the one to watch now, Phil Poop not currently troubled by Mr Regis, Henman through (who cares?).

Agassi a break up in the first, Queen Justine about to start on Centre. I might nip out for a gawp at that backhand.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 26 June 2003 13:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Alan Hughie is through against Massu. Sexton Blake is fighting back and may yet grab the second set.

Fred Nerk, Thursday, 26 June 2003 13:52 (twenty-two years ago)

"a gawp at that backhand" MUST be a euphemism, surely?

Mark C (Mark C), Thursday, 26 June 2003 14:11 (twenty-two years ago)

is this 1989 or something?

I hope so.

the pinefox, Thursday, 26 June 2003 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Scud thru, H-H edges first set on t/b, Blake 2s down and fading in third, Agassi two sets up, Dokic off to a flyer.

I'm off to Southfields to see if I get elbow my way onto a bench for Mullards-GreasyJean on court five.

Ta-ra.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 26 June 2003 14:37 (twenty-two years ago)

James Blake makes Hulk MAD!

Hulk (Dan Perry), Thursday, 26 June 2003 14:38 (twenty-two years ago)

I am glad to hear about Agassi. I like Dokic too.

the pinefox, Thursday, 26 June 2003 14:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, I say!

It's 100 posts for the Wimbledon 2003 thread!

the pinefox, Thursday, 26 June 2003 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)

& 27% of them Mike's

Mooro (Mooro), Thursday, 26 June 2003 15:28 (twenty-two years ago)

I have a feeling about Els Callens (and no, not *that* kind of feeling)...

Mark C (Mark C), Thursday, 26 June 2003 15:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Likhovtseva is in trouble against someone whose name I've forgotten, but my girl Sharapova's already one set to the good against #21 seed Bovina... £5 it is.

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Thursday, 26 June 2003 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, well - the queue was longer than I've ever seen it at any time of day, never mind 5:30pm, so we gave up, walked into the village and ate our sarnies on a bench by a water fountain. Strange - on the three previous occasions I've come after work I've practically strolled into Gate 3 with no hanging around. This time it was right round the car park at the bottom of Church Road: 90mins+ waiting time.

More tomorrow when I get sick of subtitling Teachers.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 26 June 2003 18:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Friends that did get in yesterday expressed some confusion over the scheduling - El Aynaoui-Massu on #5, Grosjean-Arthurs on #7 (a couple of benches and standing room), and a whole day of doubles on #18 and #19 (lots of unreserved seating - half-empty)? This perhaps contributed to the crushes around the place, maybe prompting stewards to slow late-afternoon ground admission. What a palaver.

Few surprises yesterday means some great-looking last 32 matches:

Karlovic-Miryni
Srichaphan-Nadal (Joan's right - he's looks a heck of a prospect)
Robredo-Roddick
Federer-Fish
Sargsian-Ferrero
El Aynaoui-Agassi

and

Petrova-Venus
Dokic-Sharapova
Henin-Molik
Myskina-Martinez

Andrew Lincoln's really starting to get on my nerves.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 27 June 2003 08:34 (twenty-two years ago)

'Starting'?

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Friday, 27 June 2003 09:26 (twenty-two years ago)

He was good enough in This Life to get his own credit card. I thought it might be a blessed relief from Adama, Apollo and Starbuck, but I'm sick of typing [Sighs] every ten captions for Mr Lincoln. Or looking up Electric Soft Parade lyrics on sites with a dozen pop-ups.

Anyway, this thread isn't about my job. It's about Tommy Redrumo and his chances of putting the skids under Hot Rod, etc.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 27 June 2003 09:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh god, I'm so fucking sick of Pat Cash, Boris Becker (yes! Wimbledon is very close to the Heathrow flight path! Stop fucking mentioning it, and trying to make the same joke over and over again! I hate you, you stupid, humourless, philandering twat!), Sue Barker and John McEnroe. The man has no presenting ability whatsoever - his hectoring 70s voice, his inability to make jokes, his pointless asides to a simpering Barker, whose name gets more appropriate every year.

Here's to a return to the commentary box for affable old codgers who haven't picked up a racket in 40 years.

Mark C (Mark C), Friday, 27 June 2003 10:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Bring back Dan Maskell!

(er, I'm not sure - should that be disinter?)

Mooro (Mooro), Friday, 27 June 2003 10:34 (twenty-two years ago)

I watched a bit of it for the first time last night and would agree totally about John McEnroe - no wit or insight, just really boring comments. The others were just as bad but it didn't register with me who they were. What is it about tennis that seems to suck out wit (compared with, say, cricket or football pundits)? But back on McEnroe, I'm intrigued by the 70s voice remark...what do you mean by that?

David (David), Friday, 27 June 2003 10:41 (twenty-two years ago)

The commentary on the Asagoe/Hantuchova epic the other day was pitiful. Here was a piece of drama on par with, let's say, 'Hedda Gabler', and who was there to frame it? Matt Chilton and Annabel Croft.

Atrocious.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 27 June 2003 10:48 (twenty-two years ago)

By the way... Has Richard Williams gone nuts? I attach the first 3 paragraphs of his Guardian piece on yesterday's insipid Henman match, which, when I read them this morning on the train, I thought must clearly be some kind of King of Carmody Daily Telegraph parody. I now think they ought to be read in the light of his 70s review of the John Lennon blank lp test wave.

Too neat, too polite, too modest, just too damn well brought up for the modern Britain of rap and road rage, Tim Henman has always seemed to be a man out of time, and yesterday he went all the way by giving the Centre Court a match from another era entirely. No heavy artillery. No baseline rallies (well, just one, actually, in the course of three sets). No obscenities, audible or otherwise. Just the kind of tennis to which words such as nuance and finesse could be applied.

It was a contest full of delicately angled stop-volleys and drop- shots feathered over the net to die exquisitely on the lush grass. It was about touch and angles and anticipation. It was like a beautiful dream, or the product of some wonderful drug.

Anyone who failed to leave the Centre Court with a feeling of warm satisfaction afterwards was probably born after 1980 and has never heard of Ken Rosewall, Manuel Santana or Adriano Panatta. It was the sort of afternoon on which, if you half-closed your eyes, all the women in the crowd looked like Grace Kelly.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 27 June 2003 10:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Good lord, and we were all marvelling at the Barry Davies/JPMac partnership when it first appeared two years ago. Has it run its course? I think Cash has actually improved, which is not saying much.

Dan M, sadly, has gone to the Robinson's Barley Water factory in the sky. I quite like the calm, reassuring tones of Mark Cox. With Chris Evert alongside him, oddness could occur.

JtN OTM. Chilton didn't seem to understand what was going on, just that some people were shouting and the pretty European lady was sniffly. Garbage.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 27 June 2003 10:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Zvonareva (Russian for "Duck worth") already through to the last 16, The Meng Sjeng seemingly on his way too: two sets up vs Hanescu.

Sugiyama going along nicely, as is Todd Martin who, while wearing long trousers, playing with a wooden racket and smoking a pipe, is leading Scuttler by a set.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 27 June 2003 11:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Schalken and Sugiyama through in straight sets. Srichapan one set to the good against El 'Boy Wonder' (can't speak Spanish, soz), Schuettler level against Martin. And Bjorkman is mullering Gimelstob, but no-one, one suspects, gives a stuff.

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Friday, 27 June 2003 12:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I think I may have changed my mind about old codgers. I'm sorry I don't know the names, but whoever is commenting on Nadal/Srichapan is the most CONDESCENDING old bastard ever. Despite his obvious genuine delight in Nadal's ability. An youthful, thrusting figure, etc. Sigh.

Mark C (Mark C), Friday, 27 June 2003 12:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Srichapan, Roddick, Bjorkman all two sets up, Todders leads two sets to one against Schuettler, possibly setting up the most solemn-faced Wimbledon match ever vs. Schalken.

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Friday, 27 June 2003 12:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Except Schuettler's just gone three-love up in the fourth. Hmm.

Karlovic-Mirnyi goes to a tiebreak in the first, and could be very interesting, but my lunch hour's just about finished. Bugger.

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Friday, 27 June 2003 12:47 (twenty-two years ago)

4th set CoalScuttle 6-1 vs ToddyMar; poor old Toddy - a two sets to one lead for him is just a prelude to awkward collapse (see: every important match he's ever played). Roddy about to close out vs Spanish Tommy, Karlovic a set down vs Max Miller.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 27 June 2003 13:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Fassbinder serves for it vs Dockstader, but OddTodd breaks back - it's 5-5 in the 5th!

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 27 June 2003 13:38 (twenty-two years ago)

THE NUMBER OF THE TENNIS BEAST!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 27 June 2003 13:39 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.angelfire.com/sports/maxmirnyi/images/Fan%20Photos/max1.jpg

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 27 June 2003 13:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Goodnight hairy Ivy League nice guy - 7-5 in the 5th after 3h20. Will we see his bandages in the borough of Merton again?

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 27 June 2003 13:45 (twenty-two years ago)

oh well, nadal lost.
next year he'll be 17. he can still be the new michael chang.

joan vich (joan vich), Friday, 27 June 2003 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)

For Nadal to be the new Chang, he had to scare the living bejesus out of a contender on Centre *this* year, eleven months before the French win (a la 16-y-o Mikey vs Leconte in '88). He could still do that, of course, just not in a tennis sense. Wait until it's overcast and project The Ring onto the backstop during Agassi-El Aynaoui, p'raps.

So much for Petrova's challenge - dumped out double-quick by the retrograde sis. It's crunch time for Ivo the Engine - t/b approaching in set four vs Jerry's poster boy.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 27 June 2003 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)

michael, you kill me.

joan vich (joan vich), Friday, 27 June 2003 15:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, no! Farina Elia serving for match vs Chandra Rubin! Oh, no!

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 27 June 2003 17:29 (twenty-two years ago)

And Chandra goes down fighting. The first of my dream quartet of singles finalists has gone (I'm not jinxing the other three).

Federer Fenomenal vs Fish at the mo'; Ivo seemed harshly done by vs Miryni the Sleeveless: overrule on a Max serve in the t/b.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 27 June 2003 17:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Yay, an Italian won! Go Farina Elia!

Bea Bielik - c/d?

Mark C (Mark C), Saturday, 28 June 2003 09:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Miryni the Weird Serve.

I don't know what's happened to Hingis, maybe you could elucidate Michael. She is surely still very young yet nowhere.

The 18 year old Monica Seles is a memory worth remembering

Cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 28 June 2003 09:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Scottish Tri-Brand is a break up in the first agains the Elephant That's Sidled in from the Cold - and has one of the deftest touches I've seen this year, almost rag-dolling Philippousis around the court sometimes.

Cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 28 June 2003 10:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Marky Poupsizzle has just snatched the second set breaker from 1-4 down to level things on court 2; everyone's favourite tiny bundle of fun, 'Lord' Olivier Rochus, has smashed his way through to a meeting with P!O!P!P! in the last 16, Agassi really struggling to find a way to counter ElAy's delivery on Centre (as much as Becker is struggling to finish a sentence before the ball the struck) - trails 5-7 2-2.

But the real stories: the brilliance of Sharapova on court one, a set and a break up vs Dokic, and Mary 'Peters' Pierce - she's back and she's as mad as hell - on the verge of squaring matters vs Raymond Baxter on court 18.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Saturday, 28 June 2003 12:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Shaparova (TM Old Codgin Commentator). Surprised they even managed to assemble words through the drool, though.

Cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 28 June 2003 12:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Russian women.

naked as sin (naked as sin), Saturday, 28 June 2003 12:49 (twenty-two years ago)

"13 (13!) in the draw" - V. Wade.

Cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 28 June 2003 12:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Further reasons to wear a bib today: the cute dark-haired Swede called Robin due on Centre later vs Henmehhh. He's like the secret third member of Kings Of Convenience - the Ken to Matt and Luke.

Agassi has won the second set vs El Aynaoui and just survived a couple of break points at 1-1 in the third after a blatant bad line-call, which Hawk-eye showed was wrong but, Barry Davies - spatial relations being his poorest section on the General Studies A-level - completely misinterpreted. Bazza was on about his son's Russian language skills yesterday, correcting Tracy Austin's (and the umpire's) mispronounciation of Petrova. It's Solskjaer all over again.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Saturday, 28 June 2003 12:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd forgotten how much I disliked Philippousis, until he won. Meh.

Come on, The Underdog!

Mark C (Mark C), Saturday, 28 June 2003 13:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Someone has to tell Boris Becker that the concept of 'dead air' doesn't apply to TV commentating.

Agassi - El Ay shaping up as a very good match. Poor El Ay is visibly weak though.

Cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 28 June 2003 14:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Agassi wins a terrific battle. Becker actually funny at times - camera lingers on Olympian Matthew Pinsent and his girlfriend canoodling: Becker - "What the hell is she doing to her ear? Poor guy." Barry - "Oh, a little tug on the lobe can be very pleasant."

Rubber-lipped Stepanek seemed to have the measure of Australia's Mr Burly, but he blew both breakers.

Ooh - Ronnie Barker's on the telly.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Saturday, 28 June 2003 14:46 (twenty-two years ago)

This has risen to heights which are possibly beyond me.

Mike, did you see (hear) Barry talking PRONUNCIATION with Tracy Austin yesterday?? It was parody Barry. Possibly one for archives that don't yet exist.

Nipper: I thought you'd quit.

On the rest - I mean... the Tennis: I will try to resume normal service next week. Right now, I don't even know the... results.

the pinefox, Saturday, 28 June 2003 17:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Pinefox: see above. Pet-ROVA, PET-rova, PET-ro-VA.

I meant 'his ear' in the Becker-as-comic-genius bit above.

Second Monday: should be the best day of the championships, so, of course, it's chucking it down. And Michael Fish had the gall to use the incendiary word 'unsettled' in reference to the rest of the week. Fourth year in a row the second week will be rain-wrecked?

I'm backing Ted Bundyian to finally stop all this tedious Henmuurrgh baloney. As the Pinefox said above, it really is meta-to-the-nth discussion now; 15 mins of every hour of coverage must, by law, be given over to Timmy Talk, Talk about Timmy Talk and Are We Talking Too Much About Timmy Talk Talk?

It's a shame, cos a Henman-Agassi semi would be a delight, but I can't stand another four days of this drivel. Can't they fill the gaps with endless replays - Hawk-eye used to its fullest - of Federer's backhands vs Fish? Get a fluid dynamics prof in from the Open University to really go to town on analysis of his topspin.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 30 June 2003 07:23 (twenty-two years ago)

My favourite Wimbledon para-drivel so far has been initials B.B. obsessing over A.A.'s racquet stringer - a guy with a big black Jewish afro who is often seen in the front row at Agassi matches. "IT'S LOU REED!!!" ejaculates Becker "No Boris, I think it's someone who just looks like him" sez the co-commentator - Mark Cox? "WELL HE MUST BE A FRIEND OF LOU'S!" continues Boris. "Heh - well he has got a great new album out at the moment - 'The Raven'" concludes Coxy, "which I highly recommend!"

This week - Virginia Wade spots a Mo Tucker looklikey in the fourth row during the Serena Williams quarter final?

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 30 June 2003 07:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Boris Becker is Rainier Wolfcastle.

Tag (Tag), Monday, 30 June 2003 08:07 (twenty-two years ago)

"Up and at them!"

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 30 June 2003 08:19 (twenty-two years ago)

"My eyes, the goggles do nothing"

Tag (Tag), Monday, 30 June 2003 08:23 (twenty-two years ago)

And so forth.

Tag (Tag), Monday, 30 June 2003 08:23 (twenty-two years ago)

My God, I'm imagining an entirely different Becker now - one I could've loved for his buffoonery. How different would my life have been in the 80s and 90s? WOULD I EVEN BE HERE?

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 30 June 2003 08:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Imagine him shouting "Master your ass" at crucial points. Get a good mental picture. Then you can overcome your demons.

Tag (Tag), Monday, 30 June 2003 08:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Instead of that stupid shuffle as he nudges a Lendl net-cord over: "Meeting adjourned".

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 30 June 2003 08:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Pam Shriver was moaning about only two women's matches being scheduled for the main showcourts today - and she's got a point. Couldn't they start at noon on the second Monday with a pair of women's fourth-rounders on each court? If the men don't finish, so be it - at least they get a day off before their quarter finals.

Anyway, it's all going rather uninspiringly to form at the mo': Davenport, Serena, Venus and Clijsters all a set and a break to the good vs Asagoe, Zvonareva, Iris Dementieva and Sugiyama.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 30 June 2003 11:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Serena, Kim and Lindsay all effortlesly through to the QF within minutes of each other. Vera fighting back vs Venus. Out on court #311, the lovely Myskina trails Capriati by a set. No breakthroughs in the men's matches so far - all is dour serve-thumping.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 30 June 2003 12:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Bjorkman takes the first against Mirnyi.

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Monday, 30 June 2003 12:14 (twenty-two years ago)

And there goes Zvonereva too. Three Russians down, Myskina looks likely to follow...

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Monday, 30 June 2003 12:17 (twenty-two years ago)

They're falling like so much neglected space debris. Capriati finished things off before the rain returned. Olivier "He Will, He Will" Rochus a set up vs Popp (Rock and Pop! I've just got it! Good one, draw organisers!).

Paradorn-Rrrrod and Justine-BigLass didn't even get their first game in before the heavens opened. I see Phyllis has already smacked a 134mph ace past former Chorley FM DJ.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 30 June 2003 12:29 (twenty-two years ago)

"Nah, I don't like reading, it's boring" - Tim Henman in saying something controversial shockah!

(NB the view from Putney is considerably lighter, plus the weather seems to be coming from here towards Spouthfields. Should be back playing soon, I reckon)

Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 30 June 2003 12:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Mark P 6-3 first set vs Agassi, Roddick 6-4 first set vs Srichaphan.

Popp and Miryni about to level their matches.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 30 June 2003 13:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm saving this thread up for later, 'cos it's the best one ever, but I have been *watching* some tennis just so I can join in at some point as yet undecided.

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Monday, 30 June 2003 14:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Serene Justine through in two sets despite a brave performance in the high hurdles from her opponent ("Come on, Mary!").

Pop is winning over Rock, Bjorkman on the a brink of a lead vs Mad Max, not the width of a cigarette paper between the combatants on Centre and #1 (Srichaphan and Agassi winning second sets), Federer off to a flyer vs Lopez.

I'm off home. Pray for the weather!

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 30 June 2003 14:38 (twenty-two years ago)

MP ousts AA 6-3 2-6 6-7 6-3 6-4 with FORTY-SIX aces. I would have liked to have seen the conclusion but the BBC decided to punish us non-digital Luddites by switching to the opening points of the bloody Henman match instead as soon as Ags and Phyllis were into the decider. Oh, and as if that wasn't a transparent enough grasp for viewers, they've shoved the news onto BBC2 too. I'm livid. Scum, subhuman scum.

Oh, well, at least Tag will be happy.

Sjeng has disappeared from the latest scores page, so I presume he's through. If the BBC cared about screening a tennis event instead of Trooping the Colour with Rackets they'd now switch to the Sharapova-Kuznetsova humdinger. I think I'll go and smash my telly.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 30 June 2003 16:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Do people really think that a guy who can have his serve so repeatedly broken can honestly go on to win this thing?

They've now just decided they will deign to show the end of the Andre v Marky game, but due to "technical problems" aren't managing it. Just as well, I don't think I could bear to watch it.

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 30 June 2003 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)

"I think it's about time Argentina put England out of the World Cup; I've had enough of this already."

Cozen (Cozen), Monday, 30 June 2003 19:02 (twenty-two years ago)

mike, if you promise to take the whole of wimbledon fortnight off and blog the entire thing, i'll buy you a digital box doo-hicky for next year ;)

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Monday, 30 June 2003 19:29 (twenty-two years ago)

mike, if you promise to take the whole of wimbledon fortnight off and blog the entire thing, i'll buy you a digital box doo-hicky for next year ;)

Oh God, now I understand what they talk about when they talk about PRESSURE. I'll, erm, think about it... (and you are very kind).

The Tammy-Nalbo match turned out to be huge fun; I was yelling for PeachFuzz and he obliged with several spectacular breaks of serve. Surely Henmank's number is up on Wednesday - whether it's Geraldine Ferrero or Derek Jarman, he'll find Christmas is over when it's time to receive, and either one of them will stomp on his own delivery with gay Nalbandon.

Off to bed now, thinking of Federer's aching back. It may be a fitful sleep.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 30 June 2003 21:16 (twenty-two years ago)

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 09:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Back after a rain delay: the women's quarters.

Venus a set up vs Davenport, but Nigel is fighting back, trying to consolidate a break in the second set. Farina Elia astonishes herself by sneaking the first set vs the previously impermeable Clidge, but is 0-5 in the second.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 13:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Kim wins 12 of last 13 games to brush aside F-E, Davva sweeps through second set vs Venus but can't keep saving those break points forever and now trails 3-1 in the decider.

The weather still looks grim here in W1W tho'. I hope SG and JCF get their set(s) in.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 13:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Venus nails Citizen Smith 6-1 in the 3rd, but little sis isn't doing so well - Capri races through set one 6-2. I can't believe I forgot to set the video.

Funky Seb has break points at 4-4 in the 4th vs Rocher!

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 14:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Jennifer, oh Jenny.

Tag (Tag), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 14:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Serena breaks for the first time: 5-2 up in the 2nd. Grosjean blows his serve at 6-5 in the 4th but scampers through the breaker like a little puppy. He's adorable! He'll wrap Tiny Tim in waves and waves of absorbent tissue tomorrow.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 15:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Capriati so doesn't deserve this. I would have better tactical awareness than she's had in most of the 3rd set.

Mark C (Mark C), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 15:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Jenny from the block? More like Jenny suck-ass tennis player!

(I'm not very good at this.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 16:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, well, at least three of four top women were tested yesterday.

Heavy rain in South London but not before Grosjean built a 4-1 first set lead vs TedIuM with blazin' returns and four aces in three service games. Good. Popp-Pppo 1-1 when the wetness smothered them.

It was supposed to be fine today. Who the hell does the BBC five-day weather forecast? Criswell?

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:34 (twenty-two years ago)

I still think Timmy will beat Grosjean, but only because it is his destiny to be smashed off the court by Mark Phillipoussis in the semis.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:36 (twenty-two years ago)

It's raining again/Oh, no, my love's at an end

Y'know, I've scoured every Supergrass album for that song and I can't bloody find it.

TH and SG returned to court for long enough for SuperSeb to blitz Henners again and move ahead 5-1. I don't think Popp and Oppo even bothered to leave the couch.

In place of real live tennis, played by real people, the BBC have bunged on the ghostly images of 1993 - Sampras and Courier ushering in an era of very bad men's finals - to a soundtrack of The Last Splash. Which surely came out in August of that year - I expect Chris Gorringe got a pre-release promo. Lucky dawg.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 12:44 (twenty-two years ago)

This whole Tim H thing is a continuing agony for me.

I have scoured the BBC's website for some mention of their super-bizarro vignettes featuring Greg Rusedski's wife and her sister, but have found nothing.

Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 12:54 (twenty-two years ago)

They are ridiculous - like twin Tara Palmer-Ts with Su Pollard's soul.

The BBC (yes, yes, this is a continuing whinge - I should probably just write a letter) have withdrawn their little treat of the Williams sisters doubles from last night to show cabbies and coppers reciting Shakespeare as a prelude to Thimble frothing back on court.

And Seb starts with an ace! Allez!

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 13:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Do you get like this with England in the World Cup you two?

Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 13:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Try SuperTRAMP, Mike. I think the album is called Famous Last Words.

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 13:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Henman was 5-1 down, now its 6-6!

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 13:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Do you get like this with England in the World Cup you two?

Sorry, it's just not the same thing at all. I surely don't have to explain why.

That was almost the most excruciating set of tennis since Agassi-Becker, 2nd set, '95 semi. A double-break squandered by suddenly errant tennis; Groggy prevails in the t/b from 3-6 down tho'.

And...he's just broken at the start of the 2nd. And Popp up a set vs C3PO.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 13:48 (twenty-two years ago)

bah, he lost 7-6, i sense a wave of doom and gloom engulfing the nation, once again...(well, not for those who couldnt give a shit at least)

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 13:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Popp now two sets up vs Poop. Certainly a nobler end to Tim's Brave Challenge would be defeat at the hands of the intermittently-brilliant Grosjean than a flopp vs Popp.

With the interactive telly service I imagine there's a way to turn off the commentary and just have the crowd; is there any way I can turn off the crowd and just have the commentary? That could be the clincher for me.

Oh, Fred! If folks are going to stamp on every minor gag I make I'm just going to give up.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Second set Henmanx 6-3, a mixture of great shotmaking and slap-in-the-face jamminess. Quite a match, this.

Phil the Greek fighting back on court one - takes the third set 6-3.

Kuznetsova/Navratilova a set to the good in the women's doubles QF. Respec' to anyone with a ground pass who's stayed in the standing area on court 2 for that one.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)

It's pouring down again. Grrrrr.

TH-SG* 6-7 6-3 1-1 (0/15)
AP-MP* 6-4 6-4 3-6 1-0 (0/0)

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't understand why it's not the same thing.

Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 15:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually the BBC's treatment of AA vs MP was even worse than MJ notes: they cut away from it not simply to show Henman's match but a) to show Roddick's last game, but not out of its inherent interest: no, because this was the court on which Henman might now soon appear; b) to show Garry Richardson interviewing Henman; c) to repeat a pre-shown profile of Nalbadddian. That was c. half an hour of wasted time while AA was dramatically losing.

Counter-argument: do I really want to see AA losing, dramatically or otherwise?

I am backing the Belgians, naturally.

Nipper: the Lou story is unbelievable. It sounds like one of your vintage sinister extrapolations.

Mike: 1) ow, yes, I was logged on for all of 5 minutes the other day and didn't even read the post that said exactly what I thought it remained necessary to say. Nevertheless, truly archetypal Barry.

2) I am surprised that you aren't making Popp - I think, or imagine, that his breakages of MP have been heroic.

Cozen's question: well, presumably there is a difference - but it's true that we have not explained to him what it is. (Possibly someone has while I'm writing this.)

I think Mike should write not some computer program thing but a book. It could be about tennis, or railways, or cafeterias for instance. It might begin, for instance, I have only ever seen one dead body in my life. It belonged to Ivan Lendl during a tennis match near the middle of 1988. The body was deadly alive, or likely dead. It wasn't literally dead but it was definitely dead in the water and it hadn't even been raining. In truth though the book that I'm imagining would be more slightly original than that, and also more sveltely thrilling.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 15:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't understand why it's not the same thing.

First of all, outside of the Federation and Davis Cups, tennis isn't a team sport along national boundaries.

There was a 23-year gap between British male quarter-finalists at Wimbledon - it was in this 'lean' time that I developed my love for the game and for this event in particular. The arrival on the scene of a home player who might conceivably win it hasn't really enhanced my enjoyment of the tournament - for some people, I'll concede, it's probably where their interest begins and ends.

The BBC's single-track approach to coverage this year (and for the last few years, but this year it seems especially acute, or I'm especially sensitive) has just depressed me a bit, and the only way it's gonna change is if Henman's out of the event. I know it's a selfish view, but - hey - I like Nalbandian and Grosjean a lot too, so that's a bonus.

The jingoistic build-up, the constant interviews revolving around the same subject - might all be understandable if it were an England-Brazil WC qf we were talking about, but it's a tennis match between two individuals and there are OTHER MATCHES going on at the same time which are, arguably, of a higher quality, similar signficance and between better players. I grew up with Maskell, Kramer and Jones purring over the skills of Gerulaitis, Goolagong, etc - I don't get this kind of coverage. It bores me.

I probably haven't answered your question. Well, there we are.

(All this during changeovers in a match which has finished for the can't. What a miserable day. Grosjean takes the third set 6-3, Philp levels on court one at two sets all - where they appear to still be playing.)

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 17:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, and Pinefox: YOU should write that book (you've had the practice, you know how they go, I don't even READ) based on how you imagine I'd write it.

Finished for the night above. Dodgy new keyboard + cut'n'paste + frequent trips to the living room + general drizzly gloom + galloping levels of irritability = garbage.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 17:31 (twenty-two years ago)

I appreciate your answer Michael. And you know I love you but I'm still not convinced. Maybe this is a 'English Media Saturation' gripe specific to this bitter Scot (why can't we just make it past the FIRST ROUND?!) that I'm projecting but the jingoism, the cod-poetic collages of VT, English-centrism (Tim Henman is England for two weeks), constant constant talk of the same subjects / same people, etc are all equally evident (and amplified as the cross the Debatable Lands) at the World Cup.

Plus, I heart Tim Henman for no sane nor rational reason. : )

Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 17:38 (twenty-two years ago)

We may be at cross-purposes here: I don't think the English Media Saturation is all that desirable at major football events either (I know said 'might be understandable' above, but it doesn't mean I like it any more); however I think my bonds to the England football team (and, again, partially it's bonds formed [or not, wrt British tennis] at an early age - it's probably the England of Brooking, Currie and Coppell I love) are much stronger and survive this media blitz, so I don't have a problem rooting for them even when I know success = another series of embarrassing tabloid front pages. Testing me to the limit: Euro96, when I did briefly hope we'd lose to Spain (but once extra time was underway, of course I didn't).

I think constantly being fed the "We're all backing xxx, aren't we?" line is easier to swallow when it refers to a national team, perhaps even the concept of England/Scotland/whoever, rather than an individual to whom one's own attitudes are probably going to be a bit more complex.

Plus I tend to love these events above and beyond the local interest anyway - Euro2000 was fabulous, despite (or perhaps partially due to the bizarre nature of) England's failure.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 18:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Here's a thought - if the weather forecast is no better for tomorrow, they may take the decision to spread the singles matches out, thus:

Centre: Williams vs Belgian, then Henman vs Grosjean to finish
#1: Williams vs Belgian, then Phil'sis vs Popp to finish
#2: Schalken vs Federer
#3/#18: Bjorkman vs Roddick

A good day to get a ground pass.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 18:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I really want the Williams sisters to crush the Belgians.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I really want the Williams sisters to crush the Belgians.

I want exactly the opposite, but I expect you knew that. I suspect neither of us will get what we want, but I can't decide in which precise fashion we'll be disappointed.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 19:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Why do people want the Williams sisters to lose? Why doesn't everyone love and adore and cherish them? Why doesn't everyone want to watch their happy victory pirouettes over and over and over and over and...

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 19:33 (twenty-two years ago)

One of my colleagues has been predicting "a Williams and a Belgian" in the final since mid-last week, but has still to decide which of which it's going to be.

ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 19:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Dan, they are awesome. And that is strictly *the* prefix to use when the girls start striding: "awe-". But there's a niggle (here or there) that holds me back from loving them, liking them even. I'm tentative about saying 'artless grace', 'sheer power', 'scud missiles', 'it's a Man's game' but I will.

'Crush' *is* the word. Nobody likes crushing.

Besides, Serena looks like a thumb.

Come on HRH Justine Henin-Hardenne!

(Note: I don't like Kim Cloisters either. I mean, Lleyton Hewitt, COME ON!)

Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 19:40 (twenty-two years ago)

The 'all strength, no grace' attack above is probably an unfair caricature, I admit.

Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 19:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Serena is ABSOLUTELY GORGEOUS, you FULE! NUMNUMNUMNUMNUMNUMNUMNUMNUMNUMNUMNUMNUMNUMNUMNUMNUM

(The preceding was the sound of the hypothetical introduction of a single me to Serena's breasts.)

Venus is ridiculously graceful (except for her serve lately, oops).

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 19:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Why do people want the Williams sisters to lose?

For the same reason nobody over here could get too excited about Martina Navratilova winning her 4th...5th...6th...etc titles. Maybe it's a British thing - "let someone else play!" I agree than Serena is a bit gorge.

The order of play is actually (noon start all courts):

Centre: Serena-Justine; Tim-Seb to finish; Venus-Kim
#1: Jonas-Andy; Mark-Alex to finish
#2: Sjeng-Roger

If it's anything like today, four of the above players won't get on court at all and that's the schedule up the spout.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 20:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Serena? Really? I believe you people *have* seen her, were you looking?

Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 20:09 (twenty-two years ago)

all the four semi finalists look good to me but especial mention to serena and kim.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 20:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Serena? Really? I believe you people *have* seen her, were you looking?

Eye of the beholder and all that. Someone find that pic of her in sleeveless Cameroon colours at last year's French. Rowr.

I'd also like to draw attention to the fact that I got 10 out of 16 quarterfinalists right. Getting more than half means I get a wildcard into the quallies next year and lunch in a noodle bar in Deptford with Ion Tiriac. Mr Nipper, fancy a knockabout in Southwark Park say, late next May?

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 20:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Why do people want the Williams sisters to lose? Why doesn't everyone love and adore and cherish them? Why doesn't everyone want to watch their happy victory pirouettes over and over and over and over and...

I used to be vehemently anti-Williams sisters for the simple reason that I didn't think they quite earned their standings: they made enough money on endorsements that, unlike many players, they could afford to sit out when they were injured -- even for minor injuries many players would just live with. They'd rate high after playing only a fraction of the tournaments of other players on the tour -- they'd play only at their best, which many people thought skewed things, and at the time I agreed with them.

That only lasted about a year, and it was before Serena came into her own. Since then ... fuck it. Serena's good. Really, really good. (And unlike Cozen, I like her because she plays like McEnroe.) Venus I'm not as sure of -- luck of the channel-flip, I've only caught a few of her matches that didn't have the commentators saying, "Well, she's struggling a little today, she's not in her usual form..."

I don't want both Williams sisters to win, because it's boring when they play each other.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 20:43 (twenty-two years ago)

That came out a little jumbled -- the cat won't stay out of my lap.

Tep (ktepi), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 20:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Finally dry for a spell in SW19 and Serena and Justine already embroiled in some kind of zigzaggy scramblefest: SW goes 4-0 up, JHH gets both breaks back but lose her serve *again* - first set to the reigning champ 6-3.

Federer also a set up vs Schalken, Roddick serving for the first vs Bjorkman.

I hope the organisers don't end up to regretting their optimism in scheduling both women's semis for Centre. The spectre of a Third Monday feels me with dread.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 3 July 2003 13:23 (twenty-two years ago)

'feels'?

the pinefox, Thursday, 3 July 2003 14:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Bye bye Henman! Yay!

Venga, Thursday, 3 July 2003 14:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh No!

(I feel a twinge of guilt saying this with Mike watching.)

the pinefox, Thursday, 3 July 2003 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Further to the nationalism etc debate: I think a key issue that Mike touched on but didn't fully emphasize is: football teams represent nations; tennis players don't, except in certain clearly defined cases. Roddick != USA, Clijsters != Belgium, Henman != Britain (or wherever).

the pinefox, Thursday, 3 July 2003 14:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Are you sure about that, Pinefox? This may be the case with Australia or the US, with several very good players. But someone like Henman DOES represent the UK, or British tennis at least, whether he likes it or not.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 3 July 2003 14:51 (twenty-two years ago)

come on federer, you can do it!

serena dances all over JHH, A-Rod beats bjorkman and federer beats schalken

also in the ladies doubles:

[15] ELENA DEMENTIEVA (Rus) and LINA KRASNOROUTSKAYA (Rus) beat Maria Vento-Kabchi (Ven) and Angelique Widjaja (Ina) 3-6 6-2 6-1

is that a doubles partnership or a very bad scrabble hand???

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Thursday, 3 July 2003 14:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Ditto Ivanisevic and Croatia, for example.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 3 July 2003 14:54 (twenty-two years ago)

these players do represent their countries even though they are playing for themselves bcz success means that the coaching system/facilities to practice that sport are pretty good. or at least it does function as an indicator.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 3 July 2003 14:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, I am sure about it.

the pinefox, Thursday, 3 July 2003 14:57 (twenty-two years ago)

then you are surely wrong ;)

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 3 July 2003 14:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I fucking hate Henman, but I having the news on BBC2 gives things a real sense of occasion. I watched some extra programme, but I can't remember what it was. 'Bald Team' or something like that.

They all train in the US, don't they?

PJ Miller (PJ Miller), Thursday, 3 July 2003 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Blijmey, Clijsters hajs wojn a sejt.

the pinefox, Thursday, 3 July 2003 15:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Venus pulls out the second set! GO WILLIAMS!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 3 July 2003 17:11 (twenty-two years ago)

GO WILLIAMS! HATAS CAN SUCK IT!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 3 July 2003 17:40 (twenty-two years ago)

hurrah for one boring final.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 3 July 2003 19:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't pretend that the Man of Hens = Engerland thing doesn't exist to some degree, because - cor lumme - there were people watching it in pubs and offices and whatnot and it were a right royal cockernee knees-up etc etc. But it means less to me than Vienna to Midge Ure.

Sorry I wasn't around this afternoon to state the bleedin' obvious - a complete PC rebuild less me adrift in reformatted C: drive hell and I couldn't even get into ILX.

Grosjean was just astonishing at times: the hook-flick to secure the break, the fierce baseline smash and nippy pass like a fishmonger's blade to fend off the break-back points. Wonderful stuff. Aside from the odd flub return, Henman didn't do a lot wrong. If we wanted to build this into another rain-tragedy we could: after all, the only portion of the match where Timbo had control was the lengthy spell played in the sunshine late yesterday afternoon. The short bursts after weather delays were all Sebba.

Serena sublime vs Justine and a deserved winner; have yet to see footage of Venus-Kim and I'm not sure I want to. Kim just seemed to implode after the rain break. Interest in Saturday's tennis (unless it rains tomorrow) = close to zero. Sorry, Dan.

Mark P looks so much like the Goran of 2003 that, now we've stated it, restated it and got it engraved on a slightly fey bracelet, means it can't happen. Federer-Roddick is a match-up we'll all get sick of between now and 2012, but relish it for its magical qualities now.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 3 July 2003 20:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Previous winners among the four mens' semi-finalists: zero
Previous finalists among the four mens' semi-finalists: zero

Rafter is gone, Sampras as good as, Hewitt is in a trough and two nights ago Agassi went to the well again and, for one of very few times since #162, came up dry.

The cliche deemed appropriate by the brain-dead Oz media contingent(complete with clever English sub-references, wot with the real thing happening not even a half-hour Tube ride away and all), will be 'Changing of the Guard'. It might give the oldest of the four (that's you, Mark) a one-tournament Window of Opportunity to snatch a major. But most likely it will provide the most pre-raved-about of the four (that's you, Andy) with a slightly overdue first of many.

Re Rene v Vene: I'm with you, Mike. Vienna awaits.

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Thursday, 3 July 2003 23:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Last time we had four non-GS winners in the men's semis: 1996, I think. Martin, Washington, Krajicek and, er, the Aussie Kreajiki beat. Stoltenberg?

Anyway, the first semi is a very frustrating affair so far. MP can barely get near SG's serve for 40 mins, then suddenly Seb's forehand goes AWOL and he's down a set and a break. His opportunities to fight back have been, inevitably, snuffed out by giant Oz serves - 7-6 6-3 to Philippoussis. Grosjean hitting the ball off the ground so meekly - I don't know what's up with him.

Martina N has just gone out of the women's doubles. Billie Jean punches the air.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 4 July 2003 11:32 (twenty-two years ago)

krajicek beat washington actually.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 4 July 2003 11:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Wasn't that in the final, though?

Mark C (Mark C), Friday, 4 July 2003 11:40 (twenty-two years ago)

(p.s. saying "actually" in that kind of post, especially when you're wrong - c/d?)

Mark C (Mark C), Friday, 4 July 2003 11:41 (twenty-two years ago)

c

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 4 July 2003 11:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Steady Mike I need you to tell me who I should support. Obviously I supported Popp but now he's gone I feel lost and abandoned. Help!

Tim (Tim), Friday, 4 July 2003 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)

supporting germans?! you crazy?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 4 July 2003 11:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Tim: what we want is a Grosjean-Federer final, which you will then enjoy without worrying too much who wins. Golden rule when watching a match between two players you like: root for whoever is behind.

Except we're not going to get that it seems... Grosjean has just double-faulted to go 3-5 down in the 3rd...

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 4 July 2003 11:58 (twenty-two years ago)

And there we have it.

Tag (Tag), Friday, 4 July 2003 12:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Groan.

(Julio: Mark's right. But you don't care.)

I blame Christine Trueman on R5. Midway through the first set t/b, she was wittering on about how marvellous it would be to go dancing with Grosjean - at which point he developed two left feet.

A really flat match. I doubt the next one will be.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 4 July 2003 12:07 (twenty-two years ago)

"Groan"

I read this as Goran. I wish it had said that, it seemed such a timely reminder of his majesty.

Tag (Tag), Friday, 4 July 2003 12:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Mr Jones to inbox stat-ish...

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Friday, 4 July 2003 12:35 (twenty-two years ago)

WBS: Will respond when I've more time...

RF-AR very high quality so far, Rog seemingly having no trouble dealing with Roddick's 130mph+ deliveries but still no breaks: 5-4 in first.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 4 July 2003 12:45 (twenty-two years ago)

I wish I could see this one. I've got the scoreboard up and it looks like a thriller.

Tag (Tag), Friday, 4 July 2003 13:00 (twenty-two years ago)

First set to Roger 7-6, eight points to six in the breaker. About as one-sided a 7-6 set as you can imagine - Roger holding to love constantly, Roddick always having to scramble, and the t/b extended (and almost lost) by Rog simply by a few lazy misses when he was ahead. He's looking magnificent.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 4 July 2003 13:02 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.rowztennis.com/gallery/galleryimgs/gall19_blake_lg.jpg

Oh. MY GOD.
Consider me a tennis fan, is James Blake playing in this tournament?

Nellie (nellskies), Friday, 4 July 2003 13:16 (twenty-two years ago)

There was a stat late in that first set: Federer was getting 83% of Roddick's first serves and 100% of his second serves back into play. A-Rod just isn't getting any free points; if he serve-volleyed it might be a different story as RF is blocking or floating many of those back.

Roddick has break points at the start of set two but doesn't take them - Federer does, finally, take his in the next game; consolidates to fifteen: 7-6 3-0. It's masterful. It *is* like watching Sampras, but even smoother, more instinctive.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 4 July 2003 13:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Nellie: he has a bit more hair than that now. I'm afraid he lost to Sargis Sargsian in round two.

2nd set Federer 6-3 and the sound of crowd on the last point was extraordinary - a kind of "Awwwww - bloody hellfire!" If nothing else this performance (not that we can count Roddick out just yet) will banish the myth of Henman being the best volleyer in the game.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 4 July 2003 13:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Roddick rights a few wrongs in his game: forcing the backhand more and coming to the net to swat away drive volleys, but it makes no difference - Federer breaks to thirty and will now serve for 4-2 in the 3rd.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 4 July 2003 13:48 (twenty-two years ago)

did Phillopoussis win his match?

Nellie (nellskies), Friday, 4 July 2003 13:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, it's a Poop-Fedora final. At last Roj shows his class.

Tag (Tag), Friday, 4 July 2003 14:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, worse luck. And it's all over for Rod Hull.

Mark C (Mark C), Friday, 4 July 2003 14:02 (twenty-two years ago)

But now, the ultimate honour - getting interviewed by Phil Jones.

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Friday, 4 July 2003 14:03 (twenty-two years ago)

EWWWWWW.. I hate the poo. He drives a hummer. He is a twat.

Nellie (nellskies), Friday, 4 July 2003 14:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Federer got a standing ovation - Peter Lundgren, his coach, was practically laughing at some of his passing shots in the last game. It was such a complete performance, my only worry would be that he can't possibly be as good on Sunday. It was the tennis equivalent of Holland's total football in the 70s - but they didn't actually win anything.

I'm trying to think of similarly immaculate Centre Court performances: perhaps McEnroe vs Connors in the final in '84, or Sampras vs Stich in the '92 qf, Mecir vs Wilander in the '88 qf. It was that good.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Friday, 4 July 2003 14:13 (twenty-two years ago)

The ultimate honour = getting discussed by Mike Jones, no? I'd like to raise a glass to Steady Mike in thanks for all his commentary on this thread, in the anticipation of a roister-doister pair of finals!

Mark C (Mark C), Friday, 4 July 2003 14:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Mike has been stellar here - I haven't watched a minute of this tournament, but I've kept reading here.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 4 July 2003 18:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Federer - the single most impressive performance of Tennis I can remember of my young life. I'm totally won over.

Cozen (Cozen), Friday, 4 July 2003 18:34 (twenty-two years ago)

So it's a Fil v Phed final. So much for my wild prediction about 'Fwee Woddick', who was ultimately monstered by 'Fwee Woger".

As a result of Poo's semi-final victory he will, in 48 hours time, have appeared in twice as many GS finals as Pat Cash. If MarkiPhilliPoo wins, the Einsteins of the Oz media will have a big decision to make: should we, the public, now see MPP as the new Rafter, or a very slightly less annoying version of Lleyton? (If he loses, the decision is easy. Mark returns to his former role as Whipping Boy.)

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Saturday, 5 July 2003 02:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd thought that Roddick vs Federer might be close, and it did go to a tie-break after all. But the praise for Roger F is essentially correct. What amazed was the different level he occupied from Roddick - who is powerful, purposeful and was favourite for the tournament! It was man against boy - or rather, three dimensions vs, say, two. The narrowness of Roddick's game was fascinatingly plain to see: he just couldn't do anything at the net. His volleys had no depth, dropping to Federer's waiting forehands and getting whacked straight back past him. In a sense it was the kind of victory for 'skill' vs 'power' of which some often dream in vain - save that Federer has some of the latter too, and that I have a soft spot for Roddick. Becker spoke of this as a ten-year rivalry, but in this match it didn't look much of a rivalry.

On BBC this am: Wimbledon's Greatest Hits: tremendous memories of the extraordinary 2001 tournament, but with background music in the VERY LOUD FOREGROUND.

I think it was two years ago that Mike warned us all to fear, not the Reaper, but the Philippoussis. Probably we still should.

the pinefox, Saturday, 5 July 2003 10:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Ladies' final a damp squid so far with the exception of the last point of Venus' set: Serena's feet slow as time to adjust into the return of Venus' lofted backhand and the resultant dink over the net was extroardinary. No pace, no spin, no nothing. If I were cynical I'd say they're sisters.

Much gravitas has been attached to the stat of all 11 games the sisters have played, the winner of the first set has been the winner of the match. It's a shame this match will probably (hopefully not) ruin that.

Serena goes a break up in the second.

Cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 5 July 2003 13:01 (twenty-two years ago)

fred, explain your oz media hatred.

Chris Radford (Chris Radford), Saturday, 5 July 2003 13:05 (twenty-two years ago)

They're hacks, armchair sportsmen. They love to bandy around words like 'choke'. They whinge. They're self-righteous as all hell. They make punching bags of Lleyton and Philippousis (if I've heard/read the line about Mark needing half the stadium if he wanted to invite all his ex-coaches once I've heard it a million times).

Most of the above mainly refers to the print boys. On TV, Fred Stolle is as boring as batshit, Newk is still up himself (OK, with some reason, and he has mellowed a bit), Pat C just grates, the Channel 7 and 9 general sports hacks like Sandy Roberts and co love to shit-stir but otherwise add nothing.

Give me Bud Collins or the late Doug Heywood over that mob of hacks any time. McEnroe wins a lifetime supply of brownie points for his refusal to rave up that Ch 7 show imported from the US despite pressure from 7 hacks Brucie and Sandy, and he can commentate without stating the bleedinobvious.

But one thing about tennis on TV: the commentators crap all over their cricket colleagues.

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Saturday, 5 July 2003 13:20 (twenty-two years ago)

good points fred. how long will 9 persist with newk and stolle? sweet jesus, those two are like the balcony guys from the muppets. more woodforde and pratt.

you read this?

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,6700409%255E12270,00.html

Chris Radford (Chris Radford), Saturday, 5 July 2003 13:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Pat the Prat Smith is the unofficial chairman and spokesperson of the Armchair Sportsman's Guild. He was out having a smoke the day they did Writing In Full Sentences at journo school. He was a State squad fast bowler for five years in the mid 70s without ever cracking it for a State game, so he has all the chips on the shoulder associated with nearly making it. And they're his good points.

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Saturday, 5 July 2003 13:32 (twenty-two years ago)

now tell me the BAAAAAAAAD

*holds breath*

Chris Radford (Chris Radford), Saturday, 5 July 2003 13:36 (twenty-two years ago)

He's a classic hater. He brandishes his contempt for Hewitt, Greg Norman, Shane Warne, Plugger, Diesel Williams, various others (and I don't admire all of those) like a cheap thug with a piece of 4x2. He reminds me of the bores you get on forums like this (ILX has mainly avoided this breed so far, poss because it's so big and there are so many regulars) who just keep flogging the same dead horses every time they're on.

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Saturday, 5 July 2003 13:45 (twenty-two years ago)

As a result of Poo's semi-final victory he will, in 48 hours time, have appeared in twice as many GS finals as Pat Cash.

You've really got in it for Patsy ClimbIntoThePlayersBoxAndHugYourDad, haven't you?

PC reached the Aussie finals in '87 and '88 (Kooyong and Flinders [as was] Park, grass and Rebound Ace*), losing to Edberg and Wilander in five. Great matches they were too - in fact, I don't there's been an Aussie final to touch the Wilander match since. I think he also got as far as match point in a US Open semi vs Lendl in '84: up 6-5 40/30 in the 5th he hit a perfect fading volley only for old skullface to loop a gobsmacking topspin lob. Ivan the Lovable won the breaker.

(* - I do like the way the name of this surface combines a physical prerequisite with something you'd hope to achieve. I believe the track at Monza has been relaid with Griptyre Notcrash.)

I'd say something about the women's final but I was at Ikea while it was on.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Saturday, 5 July 2003 18:26 (twenty-two years ago)

I've been marvelling (in my private moments) at Roj's extraordinary feat in getting just about every hittable Roddick delivery back in play yesterday (quite aside from the whole magisterial display of fluid all-court tennis thing), but many, if not most, of those returns were floating, chest-high, as they crossed the net; I do have a horrid feeling that Philp is going to be flicking away a lot of easy first volleys tomorrow. Still, I expect a coach as canny as Lundgren has a Plan B for dealing with a big, blanketing net-rusher with limited mobility.

Also, MP seems to send down a whole lot more untouchables; Roddick's celebrated WR-equalling 149mph delivery at Queen's last month was straight into Agassi's hitting zone and came back fizzing. I still think Federer in four, but Scud has this whole IronMind thing going on which scares me. It could be an excruciating two and a half hours of fleeting break point opportunities earned by free-flowing genius obliterated by an ace machine and then horrid Swiss mental collapse in tie-breakers.

Nice to see Bjorkman/Woodbridge win the doubles again; Todd W's got a busy day tomorrow - a maximum possible three matches if it stays light till late and he and Kuznetsova reach the final.

Should I be alarmed by Sue Barker's claim that wheelchair tennis is Britain's fast-growing sport?

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Saturday, 5 July 2003 19:44 (twenty-two years ago)

its gonna be very interesting bcz MP has had the experience of losing a slam final. federer isn't as consistent and roddick only served four aces (that semi-final was basically lost when roddick did not make set point in that first set tie-break really).

the williams sisters => didn't watch first two sets, watched bits of the third but you it was just a bit dull from what i saw.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 5 July 2003 20:01 (twenty-two years ago)

'You've really got in it for Patsy ClimbIntoThePlayersBoxAndHugYourDad, haven't you?'

I remembered the Wilander game five minutes after posting (just hoped like hell it was a semi not a final) and the Edberg match when you mentioned it. So chalk up one unforced error to Nerk.

Yes, it's true that Pat Cash has to try less hard than most to get thoroughly up my nose. My Pat is your Boris.

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Sunday, 6 July 2003 07:39 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm with Fred. He's too negative for my taste. And loves to praise people he's put some work in with (cf. the Phillipoussijssijssijs).

Cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 6 July 2003 09:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Pinefox makes a good point about the apparent gulf between the two halves of the Next Great Rivalry. But, then again, Lendl beat Becker the first four times they met and that ended up being very close (OK, Ivan was seven years older and already a #1) and Agassi was called one-dimensional early on, the unravelling of his game accounting for his first mini-slump between '89 and '91. Friday's semi was like the child prodigy failing the Oxford entrance exam - brilliant in his own way, but here was stuff he'd just never studied.

Cash may have been riding on that one Wimbledon his whole life, but, if you're only going to win one major, you may as well do it in some style. Beating Forget, Wilander, Connors and Lendl without dropping a set is some way to go. I well remember his wildcard QF loss to Leconte twelve months earlier - my first encounter with the phrase 'keyhole surgery'. I use it all the time now.

The Aussie media sounds appalling, btw. Thank goodness we've got chaps like Williams with his tripping on the needle-bliss celebration of Henman's second round win above.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Sunday, 6 July 2003 10:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Roger up a set and a double break. First set 7-6 after a Philp double-fault; MP's first-serve %age drops in set two and RF pounces - unbelievable passing shots, including a backhand drive-volley from the baseline, breaks twice to 15: 7-6 3-0.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Sunday, 6 July 2003 13:06 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah that first set was just wonderful. but if anyone can come back then its him as he has a bit of experience.

but so far federer is too good.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 6 July 2003 13:11 (twenty-two years ago)

71 minutes on court and Federer up two sets: 7-6 6-2. Hard to see what MP can do to change this, though Roj did chuck in a double-fault in that last game: his first since... well, at least Thursday.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Sunday, 6 July 2003 13:23 (twenty-two years ago)

federer wins the third set tie break easily. the man has only lost one set in the whole tournament and he was just too brilliant.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 6 July 2003 14:08 (twenty-two years ago)

YES! Third set rose in intensity as it went on - the last two games were excellent, Philp saving break points, Federer holds with style and rattles through the breaker.

Pick of the commentary moments:

Andrew Castle: "Philippousis is very proud of his Greek heritage...but not of that volley."
(later, with a view of Federer's girlfriend): "She's warming up those dimples for a very big smile."

At times it was like having Robin Askwith and Leslie Philips in the box. "Purrrr, a pretty girl..."

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Sunday, 6 July 2003 14:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Navratilova/Paes are into the mixed final, so we could yet see some more squarkin' on Centre as Martina goes for that 20th title.

Talking of records, Woodbridge's doubles win was, I think, the 77th title of his career. McEnroe has 78 and Tom Okker 79, so Mac has suggested, once Woody wins another tournament, they team up and try to equal Okker's mark.

Talking of Tom Okker (I'm on fire here), he was a semi-finalist the last year the last three men's matches were decided in straight sets: 1978. It didn't feel like a let-down then either, Borg was just a class apart from Connors in the final. I watched much of that year's tournament on a black'n'white portable above a florist's on Poulton Road listening to John Denver LPs.

Talking of John Denver... no, I can't go on.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Sunday, 6 July 2003 15:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Congrats Rodge. Far too good on the day, and played some brilliant shots and made very few errors, in fact neither player did. Immediately post-match Phillip Oozes promised to Sue B, sounding almost as wooden as Arnie himself, 'I'll be back' and hopefully he will. He had a great tournament.

And, until Melb Park Jan 2004, it's goodnight from me, and it's goodnight from him....

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Sunday, 6 July 2003 15:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, Fred - aren't you going to stick around for the hardcourt season? What about Flushing Meadow? Is the time difference a killer with that one?

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Sunday, 6 July 2003 15:10 (twenty-two years ago)

What a player that Federer is. The next decade could be very dull.

Mark C (Mark C), Sunday, 6 July 2003 15:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Michael - do they show any hard court action on the telly?

Cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 6 July 2003 15:51 (twenty-two years ago)

no they don't on the terrestrial TV cozen.

navratilova has just won her 20th title.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 6 July 2003 17:18 (twenty-two years ago)

But on Sky? (Sky Sports or Eurosport, Julio?)

Cozen (Cozen), Sunday, 6 July 2003 17:29 (twenty-two years ago)

oh yeah its on sky sports.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 6 July 2003 17:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Hurray for Martina!

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 6 July 2003 19:17 (twenty-two years ago)

I liked when the guy she was playing with said that watching Martina winning Wimbledon when he was about seven years old inspired him. She hit him :)

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 6 July 2003 20:55 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm dismayed to see no one here has picked up on the aspect my mother has not stopped mentioning in three days: the ugly wimbledon towel redesign

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 6 July 2003 22:38 (twenty-two years ago)

What I saw of the WIlliams final was fucking fantastic, but then again I adore them and most of y'all don't.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 7 July 2003 00:37 (twenty-two years ago)

There were a handful of dazzling rallies in the Williams match, but also plenty of bizarro unforced errors and a complete lack of atmos. I thought the Venus injury would've added spice to things but only served to deflate the occasion even further. But then, I didn't see it live... I don't even have a favourite now; for two years it was Serena, now Venus has won me back to her side. They're far, far behind Clijsters, Henin, Rubin, etc in my affections. I tried to think of a male equivalent to their rivalry and was chilled by the idea of an all-Jensen GS final sometime in the early 90s. In another universe...

Hats off to Mardy Fish - who can now join the hallowed ranks of Florin Segarceanu, Todd Martin, Paul McNamee and, er...Paul McNamee as Men Who Took A Set Off An Untouchable Champion Elect.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 7 July 2003 09:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Crikey Mike I see what you mean:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1960000/images/_1960677_jensen150.jpg vs http://www.pjede.de/208/images/jocks/jensen.gif

Tim (Tim), Monday, 7 July 2003 10:16 (twenty-two years ago)

''What I saw of the WIlliams final was fucking fantastic, but then again I adore them and most of y'all don't.''

hey dan i love 'em too (they get me going on 'all levels') but they shouldn't play in finals against each other, that's all.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 7 July 2003 10:26 (twenty-two years ago)

TH captures in picture form and HTML skeelz the entire spirit of the thread. Yay!

It would be a shame not to make the 300-posts mark, so I'm going to keep this fella chugging along until it's a bit gnarly and rotten - a bit like those courgettes that went liquid next to the cooker last week. We thought something had died in the kitchen wall.

Did the men's event suffer slightly from Hypertension Hewitt's early dismissal? His potential QF with Roddick could've been a furious affair, Centre Court so much scorched scrubland afterwards. Instead we got one man who could serve his way out of a steel box heading inexorably towards a chap whose ranking should probably be in minus figures (like The Black Hit of Space). Goran vs Pete in '94, really.

And the 'return of grass-court tennis' line is laughable; the last serve-volley final was only two years ago. We always need a mix. I wonder if the Aussies basically developed the serve-volley game, or was it those post-war Americans: Kramer, Falkenberg, Seixas? I've never seen enough footage of them to make it out.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 08:37 (twenty-two years ago)

(hint: role of towel redesign in decline of wimbledon blah blah) (adopt my mum as a pundit, she wd like that)

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 08:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Mum s & Jonesy's Dad as the new Mac & Tracey!

I renounce my initials.

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 08:53 (twenty-two years ago)

We need to pursue the towel thing. I'm ashamed to say it escaped my attention (probably because, for two weeks, I was attempting to cram all my non-tennis life into the changeovers), so I know little of this atrocity.

Have they ramped up the absorbency? The sweat streaming off the peak of Roddick's cap was faintly nauseating. We're back to those courgettes again.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 09:50 (twenty-two years ago)

OK, I'll do my bit to help Mike push this thread to 300.

Re Flushing Meadow? Never grabbed me. Andrew Bolt or his British equivalent (from the Daily Mail?) would probably use it as an indicator of my ever less 'healthy' or 'helpful' or 'mature' attitude towards our shared Mecca (that's America, of course), and he would most likely not be far wrong. Something about the atmosphere of the US Open puts me off, I've never been able to put my finger on what it is. Mind you, put an Australian or two in the final and I'll watch.

Fred Nerk (Fred Nerk), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 12:31 (twenty-two years ago)

I would just like to ask the contributors to this thread (the estemable Mr Jones in particular) if they feel that this kind of measured, informed and yet excited when need be coverage is exactly what sports coverage is lacking in this day and age.

And urge next years Wimbledon to be presented by Mr Michael Jones instead of birds nest bonce bird.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 13:18 (twenty-two years ago)

I didn't think the towels too bad.

I cannot agree at all with Mike about Hewitt's exit being a bad thing. That exit was the thing which, along with one or two other things, made this one of the best Wimbledons I can remember. I was surprised at how reticent and becalmed Inverdale, Lloyd, Cash and even Becker ultimately were about the tournament - they have a professional interest in building it up, yet seemed less enthused about it all than I did.

Great things: Hewitt's exit; the fact that people still talk about Roddick-Rusedski as a great thing, though I didn't see it (it's nice somehow that Greg R's early defeats can be as momentous as Tim, um, H's late ones); Henman beating Nalbandian was probably an achievement, but what do I know; Agassi- MP was an epic though naturally I didn't like the score; Federer fulfilling the isolated outburst of passionate partisanship with which Mike began the whole thread - in such quiet, cautious fashion; the Oxbridge heights of Federer-Roddick; the sudden, superfluous backhand volley past MP from a yard inside the court; the notion that the right man may have won; the 'sentimentality' (Becker: interesting word) with which he received the trophy (Nipper and Barthelme to thread); McEnroe's at least occasional magnificence in the studio; Becker's gradual verbal redemption of past physical crimes; and the late late victory for my bovine wholegrain fruitjuice favourite Kijm C. (Someone post a picture of her!)

the pinefox, Tuesday, 8 July 2003 13:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Australia's greatest reactionary - andrew bolt.

Chris Radford (Chris Radford), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 13:38 (twenty-two years ago)

superfluous backhand volley past MP from a yard inside the court

yes, very much so, a beautiful thing

chris (chris), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 13:54 (twenty-two years ago)

my bovine wholegrain fruitjuice favourite Kijm C

I know that no one else will have been crass enough to notice that her nipples erected at the very moment of victory.

Mooro (Mooro), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 14:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Even I didn't notice that. Perhaps I was too busy looking at something else.

It struck me that if this thread was ever to reach 300 posts, I really should have split my above post into c.15 separate instalments.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 8 July 2003 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)

One of the joys of women's tennis is that nipple erectage is pretty much an integral part of the ladies' game.

Mark C (Mark C), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 14:43 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.pixelzone.com/pixelzone/sportspix/image/wimbledon.jpg

Dada, Tuesday, 8 July 2003 14:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Yay! Stefan! One of my favourite all-time tennis memories. It finished on the Monday when Boris drove a mid-court backhand straight at Edberg only to find the tape in the way. SE's reaction was like being shot, followed by the elation of not actually being shot, all in one smooth flop to the floor.

I think this is 300.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 14:51 (twenty-two years ago)

what Pete said

also, I'm sure Michael is heartily relieved by finally being vindicated re Federer after umpteen previous thread humiliations. Hats off to Mr Jones ... and er to Roger of course.

zebedee (zebedee), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 14:51 (twenty-two years ago)

via Federer express no doubt

(my favourite headline from yesterday)

chris (chris), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 15:01 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.mix1029.com/morningshow/No-Doubt-Priceless.gif

Dada, Tuesday, 8 July 2003 15:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Dada is beginning to get a bit too persistent and quasi-random for my tastes.

Mark C (Mark C), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 15:06 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm so glad he won with such style; ten years ago I was in a similar position wrt Sampras - trying to convince casual tennis-watching chums that he was something special, rather than the serving machine they'd seen embroiled in a snoozy acefest vs Goran in the '92 semi.

I'd seen him play breathtaking stuff on clay and hardcourt and '93 Wimb would see the full flowering of his gifts. Yes, he won, but not very interestingly and thereafter won so often that those chums came to regard my punditry with open hostility - some changing their phone numbers to avoid me and, in one case, undergoing plastic surgery and joining the British Antarctic Survey.

This can't be allowed to happen again.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 15:10 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't help but still be in silent thrall to the boy Federer.

I miss this Wimbledon.

Great things: Stepanek's promise directly proportional to his receding hairline; the graceful turns Boris Becker spun in his grave as Hot-Rod and The Elephant rocketed into the last four; the return of grass tennis, wha?; Hantuchova's lips' quivering like a sea gently mussitating against the shore as Asagoe kept on proving too much too much; Henman generally; Kim Cloisters you'll never win a slam; I wish Federer was like a mercury tilt switch but I don't know what one of them is; the drive volley from just inside the baseline (oh! yes!); replay of the French semi-final cauldron of red raw seething hatred from a rained out London on sunny day in Glasgow; pints and points: outside with Henman and Grosjean; I love tennis.

Cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 15:20 (twenty-two years ago)

you just know what Dan Maskell would have said to that backhand drive volley.....

chris (chris), Tuesday, 8 July 2003 15:22 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.