Weblog Response: Do You See?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/see/

We're trying this instead of a comments section on Do You See?. If you read something on Do You See? at any time and want to comment and don't fancy emailing us, then use this thread as a springboard for conversation. We'll put a link to it on DYS? and update if and when the thread gets long and we need to start a new one.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 29 August 2003 08:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Alan is wrong about Teachers. Tim is right about Rule the School.

Emma, Friday, 29 August 2003 09:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Emma seconded. Last episode was one of the most excruciatingly bad hours of TV I've ever had to sit through.

chris (chris), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:15 (twenty-two years ago)

i think teachers is pretty funny, but it *was* best in the first series

(clue: like alan, i have been a teacher and many of my friends still are)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:17 (twenty-two years ago)

(clue two: i think everything is funny)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Mark you were a teacher!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-0

Tom (Groke), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:18 (twenty-two years ago)

when i first started writing i earned milk-money as a one-one tutor in various (horrible) rip-off institutions, but i did teach one whole "class" briefly, who wanted to do maths O-level except it wz an ESL place

(this class was made up of a single large nigerian family, five brothers and sisters, aged about 17-10, and their work method was OLDEST DID THE ACTUAL WORK, second oldest copied from him, on down the line... so it was like chinese whispers... the 10-yr-old's work was a kind of abstract work of art, no figures or symbols discernable)

i wz k-rub at discipline etc:
"i didn't do my homework, i went to a club instead"
"cool, what music wz playing?"

mark s (mark s), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:23 (twenty-two years ago)

ah ha - we were in the early stages of formulating a theory that only people who had been teachers liked Teachers but as this was based on a sample of 1 it wasn't doing too well. Now we have more evidence. I only know 1 other teacher, I will ask her some time what she thinks...

Emma, Friday, 29 August 2003 09:30 (twenty-two years ago)

my sample = 1.1 (ie my sister is 1 and i am 0.1)

i know several other teachers but have not in fact ever discussed this with them

mark s (mark s), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:32 (twenty-two years ago)

We will compile a market research survey for you to do on them to prove our theory conclusively and once and for all. I wonder if the viewing figures bear any relation to the number of teachers / ex teachers / spouses or partners of teachers in the population?

Emma, Friday, 29 August 2003 09:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Teachers is like the cast of human traffic grown up.

It's not total crap but I hate the way they keep jamming in indie tunes and doing clever cut scenes, also the jokes are kind of meh. And does every tv show have to be about 30 somethings trying to get married?

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Hm, I have to throw a spanner in the stats here. I watched the very first episode with a maths teacher and he was utterly scornful from the minute it started to the minute it ended. Mind you, he is a literal-minded soul: "No teacher would ever risk being caught smoking marijuana on school premises." "A sheep???!!!"

Archel (Archel), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:35 (twenty-two years ago)

My feeling is that Isabel doesn't like Teachers thus capsizing the statistical validity of the findings so far.

With Archel's crosspost it's 2.1 to 2.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:36 (twenty-two years ago)

i dont see, to be honest

gareth (gareth), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Either I go back to the drawing board or I give up trying to figure out who likes watching it and why. hmmm I wonder which I'll choose.

But Rule the School - surely EVERYONE likes that? I saw some this morning and one of the teachers reminded me of one of the teachers from That'll Teach Them... I wonder if he's some kind of reality TV teacher-ho?

Emma, Friday, 29 August 2003 09:39 (twenty-two years ago)

teachers is the only context i *like* indie i think: most of those songs are impossibly feeble as music out in the world but as the soundtrack to the lives of self-proclaimed stuck-as-adolescent late-20something cartoon-like losers it seems to work for some reason

mark s (mark s), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:40 (twenty-two years ago)

they're all way too normal also, and dress too well.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:42 (twenty-two years ago)

haha hatred of teachers is based on the twisted bitterness of ppl who HATED THEIR TEACHERS!!

mark s (mark s), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:43 (twenty-two years ago)

nigerian family to thread

mark s (mark s), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:45 (twenty-two years ago)

I hold my hands up, I hated my teachers. Mostly.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:50 (twenty-two years ago)

actually I have such an irrational hatred of my idea of "a teacher" it's beyond healthy

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:51 (twenty-two years ago)

mark, that was the basis of my long teachers post!

Also, I saw Rule the School for the first time this morning. It wasn't all that. I think I may have missed the good stuff -- this was the exams and sports day at end of term, so a bit dull.

looking fwd to Ian Lee back on Rise next monday. no i am. really

(tenses in readiness for thorough beating)

Alan (Alan), Friday, 29 August 2003 09:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Tom OTM about philmadoc in kroll - who was the real nasty one with the tache who usually played army blokes?

teachers - first series best.

kate lawler on RISE - cringeworthy

classic comment - 'jordan's not ugly, not like mo mowlem'

gE0rdIEr0b0t, Friday, 29 August 2003 10:02 (twenty-two years ago)

does anyone actually think two pints of lager is BETTER than teachers? i mean obv i think they are both funny (see clue two above) but teachers is way more stylishly made and delivered, even if the characters are less inventive (2PoL has great ideas for characters, unfortunately the actors seem to flub the delivery abt 3 times in 4)

sorry alan yes i magpied and then internalised yr insight: ps i do this all the time, in case ilxor hadn't noticed (not with alan, with everyone)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:03 (twenty-two years ago)

hurrah.

Best bit about Power of Kroll for the DrWho uber-trainspotter is that K9 is out of action for all of it (AGAIN), so they cast the guy who does the voice as one of the major technicans in it. His voice is funny cos it still sounds like K9. Also John Abineri (Herne the Hunter) is painted green throughout.

Alan (Alan), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Why should the characters be inventive? I like to see a good two dimensional cardboard cutout grow merely because they have to make them do stuff ever week.

I did not see this weeks Teachers, but have discovered that yes, I actually rather enjoy it. I don't think I liked the early series as much (when I saw it). I think I am responding to it being more formulaic now - perhaps finally realising that rather than groundbreaking drama/comedy it is a very basic sitcom.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:07 (twenty-two years ago)

I liked this week's Teachers, though it seems to have drifted into some kind of Metropoloposex (what was that called, exactly?) fantasy world. My favourite bit was where he grabbed that fat kid and said "You smell like shit", to prove a point in an argument.

My sister is a teacher, if that is relevant to Emma's theory at all.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Mark S - 2 pints of lager is 30 mins long and starts at 9:30. Teachers is 1 hr long and starts at 10 so by the end I am falling asleep (maybe this is why I don't like it, does all the good stuff happen at the very end?). For being half the length of Teachers, 2 Pints wins.

Emma, Friday, 29 August 2003 10:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Please do not bring the horror that was Metrosexuality into this discussion.

Ricardo (RickyT), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes Emma, then it turns into CSI.

Alan (Alan), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Thanks Ricardo. At the time I thought "B-but this is appalling!", but now I'm thinking I just wasn't ready for it.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:10 (twenty-two years ago)

i don;t mean inventive week on week pete, i mean inventive so that SIT-COM Y is not simply merely SIT-COM X BASED IN A DIFFT BUILDING

the character-types in 2PoL are not worn to the bone (i don't feel): but they are not written up to either (esp.the girls, who are kind of increasingly interchangeable in classic MEN-BEHAVING-BADLY PC-misfire style)

(actually when did "daffy asian girl" become a comedy meme? cf also dinnerladies AND the thin blue line)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Alan Teachers is Wednesday before the SATC repeat and CSI is Tuesday. Have you learned nothing of TV schedules from me & Heat?

Emma, Friday, 29 August 2003 10:12 (twenty-two years ago)

I didn't hate my teachers but I can't stand this program.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:13 (twenty-two years ago)

No, it really was appalling N. I cannot believe it got made. Someone, at some point, must have thought 'good god if I approve this then my job is surely lost'.

Ricardo (RickyT), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:13 (twenty-two years ago)

btw there is no shit sitcom i do not watch every week: sadly the we-ve-got-it-maid reruns have dried up

mark s (mark s), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:14 (twenty-two years ago)

i think i generally prefer work-place sitcoms. Just so you all know. Thin Blue Line is the exception (Sorry Mark).

Alan (Alan), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:18 (twenty-two years ago)

N, it really was just appalling.

Scrub that. It was the mnost awful piece of turgid shit I have ever had the misfortune to witness, and I've seen some shite in my time. It reeked of a conversation between 2 coked-up trustie fuckwits in a Westbourne Grove pub who invent a concept because they have a mate who's like that, and instead of doing the normal thing and writing a wanky lifestyle piece, actually get CHANNEL 4 TO GIVE THEM MONEY TO MAKE A SERIES!!!. 'kin ell.

Dave B (daveb), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:21 (twenty-two years ago)

exception = you don't like it or they don't do any work there?

mark s (mark s), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry, that I don't like it.

ho ho. DYS has had referrals from google searches of "gorgeous teacher in Channel 4's Teachers" and variations.

Alan (Alan), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:22 (twenty-two years ago)

teachers has definately changed, now it's basically the kurt and brian show, and stopped being quite so ally mcbeal (ie egg's (sorry, andrew lincoln, egg is your name whatever you are in) frequent fantasy sequences)/dawson's with grown ups, and this is a good thing.

the new geordie teacher is good too, although they haven't stressed the fact that kurt fancies her enough for my liking...

i am not a teacher, but my sister is...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Ooh - she is gorgeous.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Stop hitting on Steve's sistrah.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Have taught Secondary age pupils (i.e. 11-19) for six years now across eight (very) different schools. I've seen "Teachers" on three occasions - loathed it. Come on, people! No elucidation necessary. It's irredeemable shite.

Matt Thurgood (Matt T), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:36 (twenty-two years ago)

except it's often quite funny

mark s (mark s), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:44 (twenty-two years ago)

and it's not about teaching is it?

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 29 August 2003 10:52 (twenty-two years ago)

realistic then

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 29 August 2003 12:07 (twenty-two years ago)

On the sitcom thing note draconian BBC rules on length of a sitcom:
6. Nominations for shows which are not considered by the BBC to be sitcoms will be excluded. A sitcom is a comedy series where the same characters and actors appear in various day to day situations and each thirty minute episode is built around a separate story, e.g. The Good Life is a sitcom; Auf Wiedersehen Pet is not.

Doesn't Teachers fit into this?

Pete (Pete), Friday, 29 August 2003 12:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Hmm.. I think it has to have a laughter track.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 29 August 2003 12:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Like The Office?
The Young Ones was 40 minutes too.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 29 August 2003 12:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I didn't see the 30 minute thing, that's mental if they're applying it.

Interesting that the Day Today doesn't qualify, since by the above criteria it totally does.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 29 August 2003 12:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Teachers & Auf Wiedersehn Pet (or Auf Wiedersehn Pete as I just typed) are comedy dramas (most vague description in TV land ever)aren't they?

Emma, Friday, 29 August 2003 13:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Hang on a mo, with its daft 30 mins rule the BBC is ruling out Only Fools and Horses. I would be interested to hear the BBC try to explain how that's not a sitcom. bastards.

Emma, Friday, 29 August 2003 13:04 (twenty-two years ago)

what are these so-called "rules" you mention baran?

also what is that loud claxon noise i can hear?

(on a related note, perhaps first mentions of new blogging could have links to the appropriate bit of said blogging please)

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 29 August 2003 13:05 (twenty-two years ago)

A lot of people don't accept that The Office is a sitcom. It's faux-doc, man.

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 29 August 2003 23:32 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sitcom/rules.shtml


1. The vote opens on 12th August 2003.

2. You have up to ten votes - but you can't vote for the same sitcom more than once.

3. Only British sitcoms are eligible.

4. Sitcoms with multiple titles count as one show (Blackadder, Blackadder Goes Forth, etc.). These additional titles cannot be used as your nominated vote.

5. A maximum of 5 people per household will be allowed to vote (via web and telephone votes).

6. Nominations for shows which are not considered by the BBC to be sitcoms will be excluded. A sitcom is a comedy series where the same characters and actors appear in various day to day situations and each thirty minute episode is built around a separate story, e.g. The Good Life is a sitcom; Auf Wiedersehen Pet is not.

7. Calls to the phone line cost 10p per minute. Some networks may vary.

8. The results of the vote will be compiled and revealed in 2004.

9. If more than 100 people nominate a sitcom not already on our list, that show will be added to the voting page on the website, and its votes registered.

10. There will be mechanisms in place to stop automated and block voting and the BBC reserves the right to disqualify any mass orchestrated vote by an individual or organisation and will discount those votes accordingly.

Pete (Pete), Saturday, 30 August 2003 11:27 (twenty-two years ago)

That 30 minute thing is nuts. ITV shows are automatically excluded because they are only 24 minutes long?

N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 30 August 2003 14:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Plainly they aren't excluding things on that basis, N.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 30 August 2003 15:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I demand accurately written rules.

N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 30 August 2003 15:28 (twenty-two years ago)

maybe it is a sneaky way to disqualify non-BBC entries!!

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 30 August 2003 15:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Can anyone explain what motivates people to waste money by voting in these things?

N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 30 August 2003 15:37 (twenty-two years ago)

i wd gladly pay the bbc's licence fee if it went up to a £1000 a day

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 30 August 2003 15:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I voted in this poll. In what way did I spend money? I visited the poll page because in the mailing group comprising my friends it sparked a flurry of top tens and discussion of Brit sitcoms, so I went to put my list together. Pressing the submit button was no great trouble. I suspect the chances of Nightingales therefore making the nation's top ten remain slim.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 30 August 2003 16:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Sorry Martin - I was talking about the phone line.

N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 30 August 2003 16:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Cor, Nightingales. I loved that.

Ricardo (RickyT), Saturday, 30 August 2003 16:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, I take your point Nick (though I did this at work, as it happened, so it wasn't even my online time), and I can't say that I've ever voted in a phone poll.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 30 August 2003 17:30 (twenty-two years ago)

d.boyle's point taken on advisement re f.west's bad workmanship maybe possibly: i tried to find the pix on the net to prove the point but couldn't

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 31 August 2003 20:09 (twenty-two years ago)

bah that post shd be on the b.wedge thread

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 31 August 2003 21:26 (twenty-two years ago)

two weeks pass...
Favourite typo: killing things in Half Life with a big bun.

Least favourite typo: films for film's, which would nudge Pete's last sentence towards coherence.

(also insert generic "FFS Pete, stop being such a knee-jerk iconoclast" here, k thx)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 17 September 2003 12:02 (twenty-two years ago)

(blushes. blimey that was quick! I corrected that pretty quickly)

Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 17 September 2003 12:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Not just Allo Allo slash, but Guilbert and Sullivan slash fiction. Oh my heavens.

(Typo shall be fixed - thanks). Iconoclast, moi. The problem with a film that has been bigged up round here for two years that it sin't ever going to be THAT good. But Spirited Away was only this good.

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 17 September 2003 12:29 (twenty-two years ago)

But by all means write something on there to disagree.

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 17 September 2003 12:47 (twenty-two years ago)

The main problem with the review is that some of the things wrong with with aren't matter of interpretation, but just "No, you'd be wrong there". Most of the rest are just "I disagree". Please do all reviews in the T-3 format from now on, they lend themselves more to nitpicking rebuttal.

xpost - yeah, I'm thinking about it.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 17 September 2003 13:05 (twenty-two years ago)

One for the links: ludology.org

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 17 September 2003 13:16 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't think I gave myself much room to be wrong (I couched it all in lovely wooly interpretation). Pacing wa way out and the climatic "battle" was just laughable - in a good way. Good and evil twins - sheesh. But I hope you got the feeling I enjoyed it, just not as much as I wanted to (I checked my watch quite a few times).

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 17 September 2003 13:47 (twenty-two years ago)

The things I was talking about was that Lin (and Haku) are the only other human-proportioned humanoids in the place: the serving girls were all too large of head and with an eye too many. And the only people she feeds the mud to are herself (it makes her gag), Haku and No-Face (both of whom she's trying to make vomit).

That there was no climactic battle was top of my list of grate things about it, about which more later.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 17 September 2003 15:10 (twenty-two years ago)

I like the pacing. A LOT.

Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 17 September 2003 15:39 (twenty-two years ago)

It is very unclear why she would want to feed the mud to anyone at all. If I was left what I believed was a mysterious majical trinket I think the last thing i would do is eat it.

And what about all the other staff in the dormatory, they were all humanoid. Though of course Lin is bad enough with her 'you stink of humang' stuff. Yeah I liked the lack of climatic battle, but this was part of the pacing problem - the first two thirds of the film (up until the baby=mouse) is near deadly serious, which kind of dissipates. Stakes are dropped.

And what is No-Face all about.

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 17 September 2003 15:44 (twenty-two years ago)

All the reasons Pete listed are reasons to like the film!

I'm still not sure I like the film.

David. (Cozen), Wednesday, 17 September 2003 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)

The view from Freaky Trigger homepage reveals us as a bunch of narcissists!

One of the force powers you could use in Jedi Knight was Force Pull, which I was disappointed to find out was just chucking small object about, like Darth Maul does in TPM, rather than the obvious.


"These are the guys you're looking for"

"These are the guys we're looking for"

"Get your coat love, you've scored"

"I'll get me coat"

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 18 September 2003 19:58 (twenty-two years ago)

[Ridly Scott is] said to be solely interested in how things appear on screen rather than how characters interest an audience

That's what I noticed about Scott's storyboard drawings included on the Alien DVD - there is no structure to them, they're all surface, like a mosaic. Very odd to look at.

Herbstmute (Wintermute), Friday, 19 September 2003 12:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Sub-editor to weblog stat.

David. (Cozen), Friday, 26 September 2003 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Er?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 26 September 2003 16:16 (twenty-two years ago)

David's pointing out that Pete can't write. Which isn't true: David can't write, Pete just can't spell.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 26 September 2003 17:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Thank you.

I was pointing out that Pete made some spelling mistakes.

Which is different, yes.

David. (Cozen), Saturday, 27 September 2003 07:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Jel you menko gunge is the slimy pulsing heart of children's TV!

Tom (Groke), Sunday, 28 September 2003 10:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I know, I know. They just did it better in the olden days... "Get Your Own Back" with Dave Benson-Phillips was funny, I liked him, and the gunge had a "PURPOSE", acting as a kind of po-mo revival of the stocks. I just don't like this Battle Royale style approach to gunge warfare.

Coming later...my review of the new He-Man and the Masters of the Universe!

jel -- (jel), Sunday, 28 September 2003 10:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I saw a bit of that new Masters of the Universe, and a new Scooby Doo cartoon w/ no Scrappy + flashy CGI-bgrounds: the gang appear to have found a new friend in a Croc Dundee lookylikey called 'Cobber' or somesuch.

IS 'Flubber' w/ Robin Williams any good, btw? (I have NO money until payday on Tuesday and cannot afford to leave the house = excuse to watch tv's shittiest shit)

Andrew L (Andrew L), Sunday, 28 September 2003 11:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Is more electricity spent by using a CD player?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 28 September 2003 12:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Mark's piece on David Smith got me all nostalgic for a time when me and former flatmate (who was a journalist) were watching Ch4 news during the Clinton impeachment trial. This meant Smith was wheeled out every fucking day only to be greeted by us howling for somebody to superglue his hands to his sides.

robster (robster), Monday, 29 September 2003 10:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I am far too busy at the moment to write and to spell. But Coming Soon, why Cinemania is great, why Black Ball could have been really good but wasn't, about the politics of Once Upon A Time in Mexico. If I have time (Its Freshers' fortnight and there is no way I should be on ILx).

And I spell Masturbate wrong often because I don't really understand the concept.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 29 September 2003 10:36 (twenty-two years ago)

>Date: Mon Sep 29, 2003 5:06:47 PM Europe/London
>To: "'mark@evazev.demon.co.uk'"
>Subject: Your blog on Time Comm4nders

>Spot on.

>Best,
>Aryk

>Aryeh JS Nusb4cher MA DPhil
>Senior Lecturer
>W4r Studies
>Roy4l Milit4ry 4cademy S4ndhurst


!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :0

(AJSN is one of the commentators on Time Comm4nders!!)

mark s (mark s), Monday, 29 September 2003 19:30 (twenty-two years ago)

"the long list of Mel Smith directed comedies which do not quite work"

the word under strain in pete's phrase is "quite"

(disclaimer: i have not seen bean, which may buck the trend)

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 15:02 (twenty-two years ago)

That's spelt Sean Bean, ms.

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 15:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Mark S - Wow! he's on loads of discovery programmes too

chris (chris), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 15:35 (twenty-two years ago)

That's spelt Sean Bean, ms.

Unless Sinker is talking about Mr. Bean, Tim.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 30 September 2003 20:46 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/see/index.html#106499816426068596
can i just point out once again that i've been saying for YEARS that Dirty Den wasn't Dead as the body they found didn't have a head, but would anyone listen???

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 08:13 (twenty-two years ago)

NG I was making a rubbish joke. There's a first.

CsS: does anyone ever listen?

Tim (Tim), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 08:31 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not even listening now, so therefore cannot respond.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 11:22 (twenty-two years ago)

i thought archel had thrown her telly out, so what's she doing watching crappy quiz shows??

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Friday, 3 October 2003 12:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Maybe she could pick it up on ver Radio. I thought she had only moved it to anuver room.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 3 October 2003 14:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Special crap telly privileges for sick boyfriend...

Archel (Archel), Friday, 3 October 2003 14:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Wanting to watch TV isn't sick!

N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 3 October 2003 14:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Its not going to make anyone better though.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 3 October 2003 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually I cannot tell a lie, I've been watching loads of telly lately. But I still move it in specially for particular programmes, it's just that sometimes those programmes are followed by QI... or Neighbours.

Archel (Archel), Friday, 3 October 2003 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/see/2003_10_01_dys_archive.html#106543961073033919

My take is that he knew from the get go it was in 1. Even before he picked up the gun I said "It's in 1" because the very nervous guy was being given all these specific instructions about a very dangerous set of actions and DB kept saying "Now you have ONE bullet, to put in ONE chamber, now you have to decide which ONE you are going to choose - any of the chambers numbered from ONE up"

Then there may also have been some cues in the wieght of the barrel as he turned it??

Anyway, yes, no magic and when you've already seen him do tricks with the weak-willed 5 (the seat order thing near the end) then you know that there's not going to be mcuh to it. The 'loss of nerve" then the long pause before the final flourish was totally calculated.

(Which is a good thing.) As good as it gets with this sort of thing. Much more entertaining than man in a transparent box anyway.

Alan (Alan), Monday, 6 October 2003 11:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I have listened to Magnus and bought a GameCube (also this is clearly a last-days-of-bachelorhood boys-toys sadness impulse but I'm trying not to think about that so much.)

What games should I get?

Tom (Groke), Friday, 10 October 2003 11:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Zelda! And Metroid Prime, and Eternal Darkness, and Soul Calibur II.

You can also find multi-platform games cheaper for the GC. Second hand Tony Hawk 4 for GC: 19.99; for Xbox/PS2: 29.99

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 10 October 2003 12:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Andrew, what do you think of Metroid Prime. I'm nearly finished it and I've been thinking hard wot to say about it all this time.

Alan (Alan), Friday, 10 October 2003 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)

A friend pointed out that it's absolutely classic Nintendo to show you places that you can't get to, and let you figure out how to use the stuff you get later to reach them. For some reason people have been going gaga over this in previews of Jak II.

I haven't played Goldeneye or Halo, so I'm not familiar with their solution to FPS on console, but I suspect that lock-on (cheating, cry our PC cousins!) is the way to go for making something fast-paced yet playable. The first scene with the ghosts was fantastically terrifying, up there with _that_ bit of Unreal.

On another note, the PC version of Halo is daring but unsurprising on Microsoft's part: it was the only widely-acknowledged great game on the system, and it's never certain that any company can deal with the pressures of making a widely-anticipated sequel. Unless you're Valve and can take you own damn time because you wrote the book on "it'll be released when it's ready". I assume that's a typo in Magnus's article, by the way: Halo's the best FPS on consoles but I've never heard anyone suggest it's better than Half Life.

Also nice to see that the last few bosses in MP are bastard hard.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 10 October 2003 13:28 (twenty-two years ago)

You finally got one Tom!! Yay, how much and where from??? I WANT ONE. Seconded Zelda and SOUL CALIBUR TWO. And Pikmin - I thought this would be rub until I watched Marna play it for a long time and retreated into child land of BRANE. Pretty thingies.

Sarah (starry), Friday, 10 October 2003 13:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I got the Zelda packs from GAME for £100, since the Zelda game isn't dropping in price this seemed an OK deal. Woolies are doing £80 with Super Mario Sunshine thrown in too, though.

Tom (Groke), Friday, 10 October 2003 13:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I got my GameCube with Mario, and sometime this weekend I will finish it with grim determination. But (a) it's taken most of a year and (b) I know that there are bits that I'll finish going "I'll never play this level again, I'll never play this level again". There are no such bits in Metroid Prime/Zelda.

This may be just me: I felt the same about Super Mario 64.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 10 October 2003 19:49 (twenty-two years ago)

It was said in the pub and needs to be said again: Anna's Snake Crufts post was the best thing on FT all last week.

But it brings up another qn - we're thinking of moving videogames coverage to the sports blog. This is because

i) it 'fits' better there since there's talk about other games.
ii) DYS tends to have lots of posts and TMFD fewer so good gaming ones won't get lost.

Any objections/thoughts?

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Monday, 13 October 2003 16:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Bloody Mutant Ridley. TOO HARD. i am forced to google/cheat. bah. i done so well so far too.

Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 09:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Er, I'm not joining any fucking sports blog. Sports and computer games are apples and oranges.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 09:54 (twenty-two years ago)

oh the walkthrough says it's "actually quite easy" but then gives me no more advice than I'd already worked out. No it's NOT easy, it's fucking impossible. Bloody thing keeps charging at me, I can dodge about 90% of the time, but I still don't get enough chances for that final chest shot. bah.

Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Its a sports and games blog.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Thanks Tom.

Anna (Anna), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Sports and computer games are apples and oranges.

so they should both be on the Pumpkin then seeing as they're both fruit?

Isn't there some sort of world cup of computer games going on in Korea right now? That probably makes it a kind of sport doesn't it?

chris (chris), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:27 (twenty-two years ago)

i think video games blogging would be more appropriate on DO You See personally - enjoying the posts about them a lot and look forward to more anyway.

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:28 (twenty-two years ago)

actually perhaps there could be some overlap - if someone wanted to rave about Championship Manager or whatever's the new Gran Turismo then yeh whack it on TMFD...but posts such as Anna's - despite highlighting the fantastic concept of Snake Crufts - go better with Do You See? i reckon.

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:32 (twenty-two years ago)

So computer games which are actually about sport (cars / football) should go on the sport thread; games about music should go on NYPLM; stuff about the art or culture of games on Brown Log. comments on Pacman's (or snake) eating things would be publog. THis way we no longer discriminate against virtual reality by subsuming to a special category set off from the real world.

alext (alext), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:41 (twenty-two years ago)

sounds fine to me

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:44 (twenty-two years ago)

I think they should go wherever the writer deems fit. Yes.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Well the whole idea of the weblogs is that there's some bleed and overlap between them - so physical-philistines like Andrew have to look at the Sports blog occasionally, ha ha. When we do the weekly e-mail thing this will become more apparent I think.

The guideline is whichever blog was posted to least recently.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:49 (twenty-two years ago)

possible solution you may have already discarded: have one big blog that people are able to select categories from and view all posts under that category. pretty easy to engineer via php or standard blogging systems like Movable Type. then again i quite like that each of the blogs has a little identity of its own...

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:51 (twenty-two years ago)

The physical philistines should read the sports blog now and then, it builds character.

chris (chris), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:54 (twenty-two years ago)

The problem with the one big blog is that it gets a little overwhelming visually and as you say the specific character of each bit gets lost. I like the current system as it means a reader might visit one blog several times a day, another once or twice a day, a third once a week, and so on.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:55 (twenty-two years ago)

When we do the weekly e-mail thing?

Hein?

Alan, the trick is to be ready to leap every time he rears back, then pelt him with super rockets after he does the sweeping-left-to-right bit. Unless you're playing on hard, in which case the trick is to die.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 12:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Ptee is so wrong about 'Intolerable Cruelty'. So wrong!

It is worse than 'Down with Love'.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 24 October 2003 11:00 (twenty-two years ago)

gasp

stevem (blueski), Friday, 24 October 2003 11:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I laughed very, very hard at IC. Curmudgeon.

(Actually this film would be something I think might split the geezaesthetic divide. Canon lovers may find trouble fitting IC into their preconceptions of what the Coens ouvre si all about. I had no trouble. It was just fucking funny.)

Does that make Down With Love the funniest film you have seen this year?

Pete (Pete), Friday, 24 October 2003 11:07 (twenty-two years ago)

The funniest film I have seen this year, sadly, is 'Old School'.

I laughed once at IC - the asthma inhaler gag.

I thought the performances were bad in IC. Clooney is a one-trick pony in comedies, I think. In 'Oh Brother...' he's obsessed with his hair! Here, he's obsessed with his teeth! And CZJ shouldn't be let within 5 miles of a comedy script. In comparison, DWL had better leads (and supports!) and was a lot more fun.

And all the ass gags! What is this? A Farrelly Bros pastiche?

My opinion may be biased as I am a Screwball comedy rockist. Me and Mrs The Nipper came home after IC and watched Hepburn and Tracey in 'Adam's Rib' - much better.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 24 October 2003 11:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Do you think the teeth thing was a Clooney or Coen thing? I would say almost certainly a Coen thing (easily done now since Cloney has directed himself in a comedy). This is a film about beautiful people with ugly insides and therefore the teeth fixation was perfect (they are seens as party of beauty but are "inside". Surely the sitting before the judge sequence made you titter, or the Norgay stuff.

You screwball comedy rockists are what made screwball comedies die in the first place. Cherish what we have. I have never really understood CZJ hate either. her time is perfect in this film, and she seems to have cornered the market in femme fatales. Okay it might not be Adam's Rib - but what is?

Pete (Pete), Friday, 24 October 2003 11:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I actually thought all that "before the judge" repartee was cringesome! It was like something out of a bad Two Ronnies sketch.

(I was also reminded of this column by John Patterson in last week's Guardian - as though making in-jokes for film students makes the Coen Bros superior to straight genre pieces!

The one example from which I take heart is that of the Coen brothers, a good two-thirds of whose films have sought active engagement with older genres and movie types. The important difference is that the brothers engage in the busiest, most knowledgeable way imaginable with the forms they seek both to honour and subvert, mainly by putting them under extreme duress. Their aggressive reshaping of genres to their own ends results always in something utterly original. This is not the case with Down With Love, which amounts to little more than a facsimile movie, little better than a remake. )

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 24 October 2003 12:07 (twenty-two years ago)

That last para should have been formatted as a block quote from Patterson's piece. :(

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Friday, 24 October 2003 12:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, yes, I agree. (Not with the Two Ronnies bit in a bad way, you'll be suggesting next that the Two Ronnies weren't funny!) Point is that the last two times they toyed with screwball comedy, Hudsucker and O Brother, they had period settings. Hudsucker in particular felt like a pastiche because they were trying to copy rythmns which are now outdated speech patterns. Intolerable Cruelty works because they have allowed the leads to go their own way about the material. It is a screwball comedy but one set now, suggesting that screwball comedies are not dead. The way to recreate genre our type is not to slavishly copy but rather to reinvent. IC could be seen as a pastiche and twisted version of the modern romantic comedy - the difference here being that no-one has the kind affection for the modern rom-om as they do for gangster/screwball/depression era/fifties melodrama/scifi.....

Pete (Pete), Friday, 24 October 2003 12:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Mark! Frost rules! I love how predictable it has become, it's almost like Rosemary and Thyme now.

jel -- (jel), Monday, 27 October 2003 19:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i think blogger = acting up again (deleted duplicate story on tBW *not* deleted despite being deleted, and story on DYS not yet appeared though posted on i think friday)

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 2 November 2003 13:10 (twenty-two years ago)

I've sorted out the double post, but cannot find your DYS bit anywhere. The system may be jammed up by Andrew's dreaft post (Andrew, do you want this published yet?)

Pete (Pete), Monday, 3 November 2003 11:32 (twenty-two years ago)

thx pete: andrew's draft post was what i wz referring to on dys, i cd see it (both versions) in the "managing posts" box, and assumed it wz meant to be visible for all

mark s (mark s), Monday, 3 November 2003 11:49 (twenty-two years ago)

O, i which case I post it (should be easy to turnt he draft off).

Pete (Pete), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Okay. Sorted.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Shit, sorry. I wrote it for my weblog first because I thought it wasn't much. Because it turned into Something and because my weblog's update time is reaching infinity, I copied it to Blogger to see what it looked like. I marked it as draft, and nothing seemed to happen (a phrase that send shivers up the spines of tech-support around the world). So I stuck it in as normal post, fixed a HTML error, noticed it was too long/incoherent for DYS and copied it away to hit with tiny hammers. I also thought I deleted it before publication.

Should my draft post be visible to me? I selected the "drafts" option from the pull-down in the lower pane, and it says there are none :(

It's gone now anyway.

xpost - oh is that where the draft one went?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Its up now for all of eternity to look at.

You should be able to edit it still if you want.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:45 (twenty-two years ago)

so can only you delete pete?

mark s (mark s), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I can post drafts that have not been posted (which is what I did. I also changed a bit of the HTML so it wasn't all bold). If I have done anything bad please tell me, I'm not you standard moderator/editor type.

(The problem on TBW Mark seemed to be that is had been posted twice, and to delete you need to republish the whole site, not just the latest post).

Pete (Pete), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:56 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/see/2003_11_01_dys_archive.html#106788801700979023

so, more time commanders things.

do we think they've moved it cos it was getting good kid demographic? also Mark Urban, you are a bloke off of newsnight, not military historian and author!!??!! the whole greeks inventing winning and losing seems a little, um, unusual as well...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 09:53 (twenty-two years ago)

is this a new series (ie not romans now?)

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 10:07 (twenty-two years ago)

not sure, seems odd that they'd run two series back-to-back, but there was the innovation of:

a. kids and teacher
b. "satellite tracking" ie instead of moving the blocks around during the battle they had an overhead view of the battlefield in real time.
c. coming soon to digital "armchair general" where (a selected few) viewers get to have a go themselves!!

as pete pointed out last night, i think we were all getting a bit bored of the romans...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 10:27 (twenty-two years ago)

haha when the new second egyptian army appeared on edge the satellite tricker monitor, the kid general did a full-on "what the FU-er-er-FLIP is that!?"

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 10:32 (twenty-two years ago)

When they redo the Battle of Culloden so that the Scots win, then I will watch it. Hah!

kate (kate), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 10:50 (twenty-two years ago)

yo ptee can you hook me up w. access? i have some good ideas for posts!

geeta (geeta), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 10:54 (twenty-two years ago)

In a way Kate the Scots did win it. The treacherous ones who took the english pound ;o)

chris (chris), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 11:02 (twenty-two years ago)

God bless our Prince of Wales
Our True-Borne Price of Wales
Kick out old Hanover
And soon we'll recovere
Our blessed libertie!

kate (kate), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 11:05 (twenty-two years ago)

This is the thing that Eddie Mair presents right? It was the most boring thing I've ever seen. But I heart Eddie Mair. Now that he is leaving Broadcasting House (arrrrghhhh!) can he please present Have I Got News For You? Alternating with Boris Johnson?

Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 11:43 (twenty-two years ago)

*writes fan letter to daisy goodwin just to spite archel*

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 11:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Ack. I shall not rest until the only poetry to appear on my television is read out by Eddie Mair in one of his shiny shirts.

Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Oi, carsmile, I made that joke a month ago!. Or I could have if I'd thought of it.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 14:23 (twenty-two years ago)

thanks pete!

geeta (geeta), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 14:36 (twenty-two years ago)

On the subject of Absolute Power http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/see/2003_11_01_dys_archive.html#106851292969380071

who in the media world thinks that James Lance is any good at acting, leave alone comedic acting? He's bloody awful - I've seen him in so many shows, and in every one he seems wooden and unnatural. just BAD. stop giving him acting jobs.

Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 13:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Can't believe Magnus can praise QI after my devastating critique back in October. I am clearly right. Stephen Fry needs to do something good quick (and I don't count Bright Young Things as it) or I'll have to watch old tapes of jeeves and Wooster every week just to keep liking him.

I like James Lance. He is terrible but very serious about it.

Archel (Archel), Monday, 17 November 2003 11:56 (twenty-two years ago)

What about the great Wrigleys Extra ad Lance did. He managed to be misogynistic and repelleant in the same thirty seconds someone tried to get me to put something in my mouth.

I vailate between a pro and anti QI stance. It has done nothing to justify the use of cameras in it so far.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 17 November 2003 14:22 (twenty-two years ago)

I FUCKING HATE JAMES LANCE. I want to punch him and punch him till he can't speak and his face is unrecognisable mush.

Hehe, picked a bad day for gooling yourself, James :)

Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 17 November 2003 14:24 (twenty-two years ago)

The Wrigleys adverts are what earnt him his nickname in our house of The Gay (we cd never remember his real name) - it's the way he blows... That is possibly homophobic isn't it but its intention was purely descriptive.

Archel (Archel), Monday, 17 November 2003 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought he was quite good in Late Night Shopping.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 17 November 2003 14:35 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/see/2003_11_01_dys_archive.html#106950825600244488

Lionel, as usual, is right about most things. i flicked on to TV burp the other night, expecting it just to be tarrant on tv with harry hill instead, but no! it is a very funny look at the past week's telly...

also, what i think is the most interesting bit about the mouldy old dough PS2 ad is what the bird says "i don't know how it works, but it's good isn't it?" (slight paraphrase i think), the point being only a relative handful of ppl do know how the PS2 works, unlike in my day (drifts off into nostalgic waffle about spectrums etc)

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Monday, 24 November 2003 09:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Lionel's also bang on about that Branston's advert, possibly the only advert ever to reduce me to tears of laughter the first time i saw it

chris (chris), Monday, 24 November 2003 09:56 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/see/2003_12_01_dys_archive.html#107039925750234836

24 made a virtue of split screen as a core narrative device, and it worked very well, at least at first, before we learnt their tricks.

I wonder if there are fads for editors, directors and producers? If you're nothing in a Shepherds Bush bar if you haven't split your screen or created an instant reality celebrity in the past week?

Magnus, Wednesday, 3 December 2003 09:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I think that if the Mission (band or film) isn't important to interMission, there should at least be an intermission in the film where punters can gather in the lobby.

Deirdre O'Kane (the bank manager's wife) was probably as important a character, and she's fairly Irish (though less indie-adorable than Shirley Henderson). She's also been in two of RTE's most popular light comedy series of recent years, Paths to Freedom and Fergus's Wedding. Which is of moderate relevance because the people who made that have just made their feature debut, which stars not only Samantha Mumba and Louis Walsh, but also two Commitmentettes. I should go see that. Then I should write something to DYS, ever.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 15:55 (twenty-two years ago)

She is pretty important but doesn't really have a plot to herself.

You loved Shirley Henderson's moustache, but how was her accent. Intermission is never as good as its opening sequence. Coo that Colin Farrell.

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 15:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Her accent wasn't horrible. Dublin being a proper capital city, we've invented about sixty different accents for different parts of it, so it might well have been the real deal for a specific estate.

A plot to herself = someone to kiss at the closing credits.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Magnus I think you are probably right, but I'm still interested that there seems to have been a tipping point in fairly entry-level non-fiction usage: perhaps the basic feeble lameness of how 24 used it helped commissioning editors get over their ph34r?

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 16:08 (twenty-two years ago)

That's David Walliams, not Peter Serafinowicz in Little Britain.

Ricardo (RickyT), Monday, 15 December 2003 13:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I knew that, and because it was sitting round in my bag completely forgot to change it.

(Change what, later readers say. Post edit ahoy).

Pete (Pete), Monday, 15 December 2003 13:44 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/see/2003_12_01_dys_archive.html#107158550359918995

"Colin Baker, he was actually quite good, perhaps"

NO!!1111! Vengeance on Varos is a pretty good high-concept story brought low by poor acting (Baker, Connery, the actor playing Connery's bird). C Baker never manages to create a character in any of his stories. He may be able to act - but not with the lines and character given to him. The centre cannot hold etc, but when all around is ruin too best pack it in. Not long after Varos is the DREADFUL Timelash - a script so bad that it specifically calls for a dull set just to emphasise the fact.

I think one reason ver modern fans might rate him is that he does the conventions, acts on the audio books etc. i.e. generally plays up to the fans.

He was much better in Time Gentlemen Please

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 16 December 2003 16:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Connery plus bird are rub yes. But Baker is good in it! The bits where he faces down the torturer are good, the speech on the scaffold is good, you get a real sense of him assessing and then mastering the situation - he might not be consistent (the only other one I've seen of his is Revelation o/t Daleks which is a fine story but in which he does fuck all so it's hard to tell) but in this particular story he's great.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 16 December 2003 16:14 (twenty-two years ago)

I still hold that Sylvester McCoy was a good Doctor, though yeah, you won't find me actually watching his shows anytime soon.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 14:39 (twenty-two years ago)

i also think there was some small thing to mccoy and he wuz robbed etc

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 14:41 (twenty-two years ago)

"Vengeance On Varos" was great! Probably the best C.Baker story besides the first "Trial Of A Time Lord" segment.

C. Baker is definitely the most underrated Doctor.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 19:36 (twenty-two years ago)

three weeks pass...
Independence Day = GREBTEST FILM EVER!

Sarah (starry), Friday, 9 January 2004 14:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes Sarah, I have seen Virus, and it stinks.

Pete (Pete), Friday, 9 January 2004 14:57 (twenty-two years ago)

the first hour of ID4 is good

stevem (blueski), Friday, 9 January 2004 14:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Pete I wished you had a mobile yesterday, so I could have texted you "ALIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIUMS".

Sarah (starry), Friday, 9 January 2004 15:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Keep wishing and it might come true....

Pete (Pete), Friday, 9 January 2004 15:39 (twenty-two years ago)

two weeks pass...
Man, Judge John Deed is THE BOMB.

Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 12:20 (twenty-one years ago)

two months pass...
Martin Skidmore Re: Private Life Of A Masterpiece
http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/see/2004_04_01_dys_archive.html#108230126763530259

> Even when analysing the composition they do a weak job, including
> missing the significance of the shape of the clouds, admittedly only
> clear in the better quality prints.

care to enlighten us?

koogs (koogs), Monday, 19 April 2004 13:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Structurally the whole game is echoing structures and shapes, and the clouds have some echoes of the main wave. Unfortunately none of my reproductions show this very well, but it was clear in some of the best shots on the TV show. They pointed out that a subsidiary wave mirrored Fuji's shape, but they didn't mention this.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 19 April 2004 18:18 (twenty-one years ago)

ta.

i enjoyed said show but i guess, like those dexy's documentaries on radio 2, that it was pitched at us beginners. nice to learn that there were another 45 just like it too (my desktop is currently some men measuring a tree with fuji way off in the distance). i didn't even know it was a woodcut until the show and was great to see someone trying to recreate it (was a good weekend for woodcuts all round - sunday night had a documentary about william morris and featured his hand blocked wallpaper).

but yes, it was kinda light. still, at least it wasn't rolf harris 8)

(actually, i liked the rolf harris art thing)
(i don't like the new freaky trigger comment mechanism though hence the post here)

best set i found was here: http://www.theprices.com/view1.htm but the interface, not to mention the poetry, is awful.

andy

koogs (koogs), Tuesday, 20 April 2004 07:41 (twenty-one years ago)

As it happens, the one they showed with the lightning bolt below the peak of Fuji, from the same series, is my work desktop wallpaper at the moment.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 20 April 2004 16:10 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
revive!

I hope most of you have been reading the FT's top 100 films, which strated sometime last week.

Was gonna revive this at around 9am with a PETE THE SEQUEL HATA!!! kind of post but he's just given props to the godfather pt II.

A bit too much in the 'lets smash the canon'-mode but I like it a lot so far.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 10:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Oi! "Let's smash the canon?" I'll have you know that this top 100 was scientifically reached after a survey of respected film critics! Admittedly the methodology was unusual but that was Pete's prerogative.

We established the 100 greatest records ever made a couple of weeks before the films one. You'd have liked it a lot, Julio, but unfortunately the bits of paper were included in tom's washing and are therefore lost forever.

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 11:09 (twenty-one years ago)

The 100 Grebtest Films is finally up?! JOY!

(Nuns On The Run woz robbed, obv.)

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 11:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Its going up slowly but surely Matt.
Other contributors start chipping in soon too. As Tim sez, I can't help if the contributors started with the canon and got on to the rest. And canons are there to be rubbished. Methodology is explained away too.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 11:17 (twenty-one years ago)

yeh i think the Barang has nailed it so far, altho Empire Strikes Back was unjustly negated

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 11:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Empire Strikes Back has a beginning that rubbishes the triumphant end of Star Wars, hasn't got an end and has barely got a middle. Its rubbidge.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 11:33 (twenty-one years ago)

b-b-b-b-b-but it's daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrk innit?

chris (chris), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 11:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Pete: bitterness is never becoming.

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 11:35 (twenty-one years ago)

it's a MIDDLE ACT, and it has character development, big walking tanks and bounty-hunters, dark tings a gwan - but i am fine with it not being included as the summary of Star Wars was succinct and the inclusion of sequels doth clog proceedings

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 11:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Star Wars (IV) does have the best closing line of any film ever tho

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 11:36 (twenty-one years ago)

what do you think Chewbacca was actually saying on the medal podium?

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 11:37 (twenty-one years ago)

eeeeuuuaaaaarrrrrrggggghhhhh it sounded like

chris (chris), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 11:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Everything to do with Star Wars apart from the original film is a big old load of bollocks.

Ricardo (RickyT), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 11:38 (twenty-one years ago)

so what is Chewbacca actually saying in that final shot in Star Wars?

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 11:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Has the scientific-ness of this list been tested on proven by science yet?

''We established the 100 greatest records ever made a couple of weeks before the films one. You'd have liked it a lot, Julio, but unfortunately the bits of paper were included in tom's washing and are therefore lost forever.''

I'm sure I would've liked it Tim! *coughs*

I'm looking forward to other ppl's contributions.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 11:43 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm looking forward to my contributions, and to getting the list.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 11:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry Andrew. List winging its way now.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 25 May 2004 11:46 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
the clomid symptom

clomid symptom, Wednesday, 27 July 2005 12:04 (twenty years ago)

Not the kind of response I was expecting, got to say...

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 12:11 (twenty years ago)

[spam deleted]

discount computer shopping, Tuesday, 9 August 2005 12:37 (twenty years ago)

We get all the best posts on here...

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 12:51 (twenty years ago)

Unusually restrained spam for once.

DYS is a great collection of great writing, it must be said. Discounting my occasional wafflings.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 13:03 (twenty years ago)

Don't call it DYS, Ned, since they are using "Do U See?"...

Leon C. (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 13:08 (twenty years ago)

I MAINTAIN MY INDIVIDUALITY AGAINST THE OPPRESSION OF THE HIVEMIND

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 9 August 2005 13:09 (twenty years ago)

three months pass...
Troll!

Momus (Momus), Monday, 14 November 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)

[spam]

Vito, Sunday, 20 November 2005 22:18 (twenty years ago)

spam

Norman, Tuesday, 22 November 2005 12:10 (twenty years ago)

[spam links deleted]

Herbert, Sunday, 4 December 2005 23:24 (twenty years ago)

two months pass...
[spam]

dede dede, Monday, 6 February 2006 12:05 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.