Having a crush on someone for an extended period of time but never having the guts to say anything - c or d?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
And how long is too long? A week? A month? A year?

Fugs, Monday, 6 October 2003 21:03 (twenty-one years ago)

both

mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, trite as it sounds - both

Classic because it's quite an interesting, safe state to revel in.

Dud because they'll probably say no if you ever ask them because after all that time you'll make a pig's ear of it and also dud because it indicates that you are a thinker and a dreamer and not a doer and as a result your youth will always be a bit crappy and you'll end up looking back and think 'hmm - that was a bit rubbish'.

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Totally dud. And the result of quite a bit of bad poetry across the ages.

Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 6 October 2003 21:18 (twenty-one years ago)

dud, this is the area of my life I can't sort out really. Not that this has happened me in ages, thank god, but relationships in general, tricky business.

Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Dud, because you'll always look back and ask yourself "what if...? " and without ever getting a satisfactory answer.

Vic (Vic), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:36 (twenty-one years ago)

argh i always mess up my posts by editing, cross out the "and" in the last one

Vic (Vic), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Classic because it's quite an interesting, safe state to revel in.

Dud because they'll probably say no if you ever ask them because after all that time you'll make a pig's ear of it and also dud because it indicates that you are a thinker and a dreamer and not a doer and as a result your youth will always be a bit crappy and you'll end up looking back and think 'hmm - that was a bit rubbish'.

Hah! My life in a nutshell!

Person one: five years, at a stupid age, longing. Eventual answer = "No" (as delivered to proxy asker-outer; "He's a pervert"; what is a pervert age 15?)

Person two: two years longing. Eventual answer = "No" (different proxy asker; no reason given)

Person three: two years longing. Eventual answer = "No" ("Not even if you hadn't been so drunk")

Person four: two years longing. Eventual answer = there wasn't one, I didn't bother to ask. She was twenty years older than me, and married. But I still think I would have had a good chance.

Person five: three years wanting. Initial answer = "No". But there was cause to believe it wasn't as simple as that. Two more years longing. Final answer = she disappeared.

So, classic. I have not given up on any of these.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Wot about getting the person youve fantasised about, deamt about, whacked off over etc etc for ages and then finding it out she's a pain in the arse?

Fugs, Monday, 6 October 2003 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

if you hit ten years you should move on [/voice of experience]

amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)

in the meantime it's much better to imagine they have a crush on you too and you're both in a state of suspended animation.

amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Daniel Johnston to thread

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 6 October 2003 22:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Completely and utterly dud. Waste of time and energy. Romanticization of this in hundreds of poptunes notwithstanding, it's an absurd position to be in and will drive you insane. If you like someone you should just do something about it or move on. Thumb up ass is no way to go about living.

TOMBOT, Monday, 6 October 2003 22:18 (twenty-one years ago)

either that or don't say anything and just put it on complete mental hold and move on. Then check back in a few years. who knows? But yeah, do not do the long term friend thing with the person while you are in love with them. That sucks!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Tombot = OTM, as usual.

Nicolars (Nicole), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)

From a strictly Darwinian POV, this is an ultra dud, since you never get to pass along your genes and fall by the wayside as just another junker parked on the apron of the Great Highway of Life.

Remember the Darwin Cheer:

Sperm and egg! Sperm and egg!
Ram 'em! Cram 'em! Let 'em mate!

Aimless, Monday, 6 October 2003 22:36 (twenty-one years ago)

ok, seriously, how do you STOP having a crush on someone if you'd just prefer to move on?

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe pretend she's a Creed fan?

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Is not exactly like you have any choice in the matter now,is it?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Charlie Fuckin' Brown to thread.

http://www.unitedmedia.com/comics/peanuts/meet_the_gang/images/meet_charlie_brown_big.gif

Kingfish (Kingfish), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey, my hero! Well, one of them.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 6 October 2003 23:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Wot about getting the person youve fantasised about, deamt about, whacked off over etc etc for ages and then finding it out she's a pain in the arse?

Well obv. this is a tremendously good sign. Thank your lucky stars you don't instead start falling in love with her paininthearseness.

ok, seriously, how do you STOP having a crush on someone if you'd just prefer to move on?

Hypnotherapy?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 6 October 2003 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)

As I suggested before:

how do you stop having a crush on a person you emphatically DO NOT want to have a crush on?

N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 6 October 2003 23:31 (twenty-one years ago)

These threads should be helping me, but they're not.

Fuck you guys.

ModJ, Monday, 6 October 2003 23:48 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.osric.com/~jeremy/lambertpost.jpg

Kingfish (Kingfish), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah. sucky sucky. But I have talked to him, I have!... but I am leaving in a week for 6 months so i figure i can say or do whatever i like and it won't matter.

Nellie (nellskies), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Heavens, Justyn! The best cure for a crush is to engage with the object of it. Often. As often as possible. Any way you can. Said crush-object will humanize before your very eyes.

No guarantees about the direction in which this humanization occurs, but no matter how it occurs, you won't have a crush any more. Either you'll develop a realistic relationship, or you'll suffer revulsion. Hurrah! No more crush.

Aimless, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I've had a crush object now for four years, one I do converse with regularly. I've talked with her for hours on end, humanizing you, and now I'm stuck with a crush object who seemingly represents all I despise.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:35 (twenty-one years ago)

how long is too long?

Five years. And dud X 10. Especially dud if one drunkenly confesses said crush and the object of affection decides that they do not want to be one's friend anymore.

Sadly, humanizing is only possible when the person in question is not screening your calls.

mouse, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Screening your calls? Yeah, that's a common one. Worse than that: blocking you over MSN and only unblocking you when none of her other friends are online. That kinda lets you know your place.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Some of the people on this thread have got serious problems. Holy shit.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 01:11 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, poor Charlie Brown should have tried a new psychiatrist at some point.

Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 06:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Classic. I heart agony.

Dave M. (rotten03), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 06:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Classic thread!
Hmm my experience is that you can humanize all you want, it's not necessarily gonna appease the crus. Once, I shared a flat with one and things didn't really change. The only solution for me is to completely avoid any contact for 3-4 months.

Fabrice (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Dud. You should get the inevitable rejection and heartbreak over with as soon as possible and get on with your life.

Unless, like, you enjoy the angst of it all. Which I generally do. And you know what? The crushes that went on the longest were actually the ones that *were* returned. And, sort of five years later, the bloke in question would say something like "Dammit, I thought you were hot, why'd you never say anything?" or, erm, "You were hot but I thought you were a psycho or something. You just had a CRUSH on me?"

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:05 (twenty-one years ago)

As Dom says, aimless's assurances are sadly not to be relied upon.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Kate's email address brings me to say:

Jason Pierce to thread!

Oh, and it's gotta be both; really it's a question like 'breathing - c/d' or 'drinking water - c/d'. Isn't it?

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)

What?

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Spacemen 3 = Sonic Boom + Jason Pierce. Actually, did it? I can't remember the non-Jason Pierce guy's name. But I thinkit was Sonic Boom. And JP's 'L&GWAFIS' is the Classic extended period of time crush soundtrack.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Harrumph.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:28 (twenty-one years ago)

?!?!?!????!!!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Extremely dud. You need to say something & if you get a knock back, you can move on & if not....

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:31 (twenty-one years ago)

What? seriously though? Have I been taking crazy pills?

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:31 (twenty-one years ago)

N.'s first post on this thread is awfully wise.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry, it's just funny to me to have someone explaining Spacemen 3 things to me. Next you'll be asking if I'm Kate Radley! Heh heh!

I am just playing, BTW!

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Frighteningly so. But this is putting me in mind of a famous and actually quite trite Orson Welles quote that crops up in (I think) 'Lady from Shanghai' about a frog and a scorpion (or something) and the immutability of character. Trite as it is, I can't help (ooh, subliminal) thinking it true.

Ah! Yes. When I was a lurker I think I saw something along those lines; but if you were presumably you'd be having money burnt on you, not ILXing.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:41 (twenty-one years ago)

in that I think the kind of people who get long-term crushes represent a kind of fundamental personality type - Pinkpanther and Tombot's advice is very sensible and I quite agree with it rationally but emotionally and practically it makes as much sense to me as sinners vs winners man does, it seems like a person who could just "move on" much less "talk to somebody and move on" would have basically different brain wiring to me.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Long-term unrequited crushing serves a very important purpose for some people. Like Tom said before, that if you have a crush on someone, it's usually because you wish to be them, or wish to incorporate some aspect of them that you wish you had - or words to that effect (sorry if I'm paraphrasing). The Courtly Love aspect, where you try to make yourself better in order to prove yourself worthy of them can be quite good for those who otherwise lack the motivation for self improvement. But those aren't necessarily crushes that you *want* requited.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Tom OTM (I can't be the first to see the anagram). What if both people involved in this are passive-aggresive (which cd be the proper term, dunno). If they both enjoy New Order's 'Bizarre Love Triangle' too much, if you know what I'm saying? Then maybe it = classic. Spoiler - this is sort of the premise for the new B-Kno film.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:50 (twenty-one years ago)

allow me here to say how much I absolutely loathe the term "move on" - it's so dreadfully overused, all the time. DUD. as if its the only phrase available to describe this action, whether it be by political candidates referring to the irrelevancy of a scandal (this recently happened), or a psychiatrist giving direction to a neurotic patient, to perhaps a struggling artist describing what she did in regards to a failed project. we need new phrases to desctibe "leaving a situation behind." really, the english language just seems so limited at times

Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 08:37 (twenty-one years ago)

OTM - it's psychobabble of the worst kind.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 08:48 (twenty-one years ago)

"Move on" = the new "Get Over It".

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 08:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Or indeed, 'get a life', *the* most hurtful comment circa 1993, not unrelated to the old 'pull yourself together' but in a brash, new, tab-clear drinking, megadrive-playing '90s way.
There's a cheesy line from 'Magnolia', which I won't quote but which I think is quite apt.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:00 (twenty-one years ago)

saying 'get over it' seems pretty derogatory though, don't you think?

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, it is. Though I don't think it was originally intended that way. Like Enrique said, "Get over it" is the sassy "pull yerself together". All of them are "helpful" things people say that are not helpful at all.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:05 (twenty-one years ago)

It's weird, it has different forms. If said as a [insert grammatical term - accusative? like a command?], ie 'get *over* it' in a 'Clueless' stylee, that's derogatory. But people say it of themselves, as if they've internalized the Oprah-speak: I've just got to get over it. It's inadequate as language, it doesn't tell you anything; it really means: I'll shut up about it now.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Same with "move on," but it sounds even more stupid. What are you "moving on" to ? The next bus stop ?

Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I still like 'pull your socks up' best.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Whenever anyone says "move on" I hear this nice, 80s synthesizer riff all "bow-bow um umph bow-bow-umph" in my head.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:12 (twenty-one years ago)

yes don't say "move on" or "get over it" or "pull yourself together" to me because I just DON'T WANT TO I want to sit here being moody and fantasizing about my dream life with some other person I'm never actually going to even talk to!! This is fine for me and it's unhelpful of you to tell me to stop it as it's not like I'm hurting anyone with my behavior right and besides it's impossible to "get over it" anyway, nobody has ever in the history of the world actually gotten over a crush they had on anybody, it's all true true true.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:17 (twenty-one years ago)

oh and attacking the language when you've got no answer for the substance = a true ILX classic

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:18 (twenty-one years ago)

People do, if you like, get over it; but probably not by being told 'get over it', you know. I'm channeling my 17-year-old self a bit, but I don't think being told would've made a difference. Moody fantacizing is what being teenage is all about; any regret I have isn't of the serious 'my God I ran over all those people sort'; it provdies a lush, comforting melancholy, like a good red wine; it almost isn't regret at all. Now I realize I should've been listening to 'Supa-Dupa Fly' instead of 'Pet Sounds'. But what the fuck, you know?

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm really not "getting" your attitude here, Tombot. Are you being sarcastic?

Because really. Unrequited crushes? Don't actually hurt anyone (except the crusher) and honestly. Sounds like YOU need to "get over it" because some people - believe it or not - actually get something out of the experience.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Tom you actually are acting like some sort of reactionary robot now (shocker), since if you had bothered to look upthread, you'd see that I fully agreed with your position of the answer to thread question being total dud, and I in fact responded to it before you even did. Discussing how the language seems obsolete isn't exactly the same thing as disagreeing with what it says. It would help if the language used wasn't all empty cliche in the first place; the sentiment to "go ahead with your life" would be more effectively expressed if these phrases weren't used automatically all the time.

Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:28 (twenty-one years ago)

had two crushes, each for about two years and never asked but the two girls in q never asked me so I assume the feelings would not be returned.

I've had one more crush since then but the girl in q had a boyf already.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:29 (twenty-one years ago)

You should both take it personally.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:29 (twenty-one years ago)

but the two girls in q never asked me so I assume the feelings would not be returned

Julio, you should never assume that! Maybe either was waiting for you to ask her...

Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:33 (twenty-one years ago)

if i've heard it once...

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't have a crush right now (wah!) but I shall immediately run out and get one, just so I can bang on about it endlessly to offend you, Tombot! Hah!

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:38 (twenty-one years ago)

''Julio, you should never assume that! Maybe either was waiting for you to ask her...''

its the kind of thinking that haunts me vic but its too late now.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:42 (twenty-one years ago)

TOMBOT advocates a highly regimented emotional life. Does anyone live up to it? I think in the years immediately post-teenage I'd have agreed with him, but I realized that was a different kind of denial - there's a Nietzche quote used by Reynolds recently that encapsulates it.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Life without crush is a life not worth living. Crushdom is so tied up with fantasy and wish-fulfillment and dreams and ambitions that I *refuse* to let go of it or "move on" from it. I may move on from individual crushes, as I no longer need the things that the person represents, or, indeed, the reality of that person intrudes. But I will never move on from *having* crushes. I hope.

It's been a while. I need a new one. I'm just sick of having crushes on musicians because I'm so disillusioned with music.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Hm. Actually, depending on the degree of the seriousness of the crush or emotion invested within it, I don't think this is unequivocally a "dud" position, if it isn't actively *bothering* the crusher too much --> ie, nights are wasted on this, you don't think of this person everyday in the shower as you finger your loofah, you haven't renamed your pet after him/her. In other words, if it remains a crush and not an obsession and it's just something on the side you actually enjoy, like a little game in your head (ie, every time you see this person you start imagining them in all sorts of different naked positions while pretending to listen to their conversation, etc) - then in these circumstances I think secret crushes can maybe be a thing to be enjoyed...if you have no real desire to do anything anyway and you can remain indifferent or detached from it, on some level. Love from far away . A peaceful love, of course it's probably not really "love" at all, but just a passing fancy that you may wish to keep private as you doodle outrageous pictures of the person in variegted spandex outfits in your sketch book.

So as N said way above: both

Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:03 (twenty-one years ago)

LAUGHING LIONS WILL COME!!

friedrich s (mark s), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks Mark - that was exactly the one I meant.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I can ignore laughing lions as easily as I can ignore boys setting their asses on fire.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:18 (twenty-one years ago)

MOY ARSE IS ON FOYRE!

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:20 (twenty-one years ago)

*pisses on N.'s arse*

Ricardo (RickyT), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Is something burning in here? Does anyone smell sulphur? Oh well, who cares, what's on telly?

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:25 (twenty-one years ago)

You guys are on the wrong thread, get over to the humiliation thread!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Now I've been thinking about this & if the crush isn't affecting the person, in that they are not upset or frustrated by it, then it can go on for aslong as is necessary. I mean, they may not want to do anything about it.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:27 (twenty-one years ago)

PP beat me to it

Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:28 (twenty-one years ago)

What disturbs me most is how N is now talking like he's on Time Team.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:29 (twenty-one years ago)

*bows at Vic*

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I may have been misinterpreted. Crushes are rubbish, romanticising crushes is rubbish, I am very envious of people who can snap their fingers and move on/get over it, but it is useless advice if you're a person who can't. It's like: you're in the jungle, you've fallen into an elephant trap, ouch, you want to get out of it, along comes Tombot who has an amazing jetpack and says "Hey fella what you need to do is get out of that trap". Great advice if you had that jetpack yourself. As it is you have to slowly build a ladder out of the available vines and twigs.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think it is that cut & dried tom. Of course getting over something or someone is difficult definitely. But it's about trying to learn how to live past that. Not dwelling for hours about your non-existent wedding & such like.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Obv not you fictional wedding Tom, cos that is real, I mean it's not fake, well of course....oh nevermind.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:34 (twenty-one years ago)

!!!!!!!

Tom, that's just shot my entire perception. It's really strange how someone gives you a piece of advice, you think about it, go "hmm, that's quite good" and you follow it, and have these interesting experiences and they're good. And then the person that you thought gave you that advice comes along and says THAT'S NOT WHAT I MEANT AT ALL!!!

I'm so disappointed.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I knew what you meant, Tom.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Again it's hard to call crushes or the romanticizing thereof 'rubbish', either if you're in one now, are prone to them, or just devoted much of your youth to them. I can't conceive of a stable vantage point from which to call it 'rubbish' since it's been part of me; and for the same reason I know that crushes can be pleasurable. Who here, or anywhere, is 'madure' enough to say that those pleasures are wrong or unhealthy, and that by implication they are 'sorted out' and above 'all that' (I'm not suggesting Tom is btw)?

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Suggesting it, I mean.

I can laugh about it now but at the time it was terrible...

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Crushes can be completely classic in the right circumstances. I've had a crush on someone for about three years, but at the moment it's sort of working out for me because we don't see each other very often, but when we do we get on really well. The best part about crushing on someone (as opposed to crushing someone) is interpreting every little thing they do, spending hours reading their text messages over and over again, replaying conversations in your head. Actually, come to think of it, this can also drive you insane. Erm, but the classic part is when you're not too invested in it as a real thing, but as a kind of romantic daydream, fuelled every so often by little things they do. Of course this only works if you're friends with the person.

kathryn m (kathryn m), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyone who has ever had an unrequited crush needs to experience being on the other side. (Same is true for break-ups.)

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry Kate I will probably disagree with myself again in another few years.

Enrique I think that the pleasures are wrong and unhealthy in much the same way as any recovering addict thinks of their particular pleasures, i.e. I would never suggest I was 'above all that', I've just been 'clean' for a while now and I'm loving it. I did spend most of my youth doing it and as N. said right at the top of the thread all it meant was that I had a bit of a crummy youth.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:45 (twenty-one years ago)

ten *years* amateurist ?
in the words of bill hicks when talking about people on respirators
smoking through their neck :
that shows a commitment i can't relate to.

piscesboy, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Some of the best experiences of my life have been because of unrequited crushes! Honestly!

Maybe the good experiences were indirectly the results of the crushes... or the results of my trying to make my crush known without actually having to come out and say it (writing popsongs, making art, etc.). I don't think my youth was shite because of my crushing - if anything, if I ever *had* got the attentions of the object of my affections, my life wouldn't have been half so interesting and diverse as it has been. I could have ended up a suburban housewife or something! Blessing in disguise!

The thing you have to let go of is the idea that a crush has to be REQUITED in order to be good or useful or whatever. Not the crushing impulse itself.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:51 (twenty-one years ago)

whats wrong with "leaving a situation behind"?

how about, "becoming more like a distant emperor, bored of his toy"?

charltonlido (gareth), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:52 (twenty-one years ago)

That's the point I was trying to make. (Kate) If it isn't hurting you in anyway, then carry on regardless!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm probably being a bit extreme Kate. I know what you mean about crushes leading to creativity but in my case I reckon my creativity is much enhanced by not having the hobgoblin of infatuation clinging to my back. It's a continuum etc.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Tom - absolutely, I spose I'm probably not quite ready to say I had a crummy youth as I'm in terms of age close to it; and I'm also taking the somewhat defensive position (defendable too, though) that *most* people have crummy youths, and that to try too hard to repress that is just as unhealthy as revelling in it. I dunno how clean I am, pretty clean, but still - how to put it? - fair game for Belle and Seb's marketing bods.
Now last year I was 21 - I didn't have a lot of fun...

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Crushes can be completely classic in the right circumstances. I've had a crush on someone for about three years, but at the moment it's sort of working out for me because we don't see each other very often, but when we do we get on really well. The best part about crushing on someone (as opposed to crushing someone) is interpreting every little thing they do, spending hours reading their text messages over and over again, replaying conversations in your head. Actually, come to think of it, this can also drive you insane. Erm, but the classic part is when you're not too invested in it as a real thing, but as a kind of romantic daydream, fuelled every so often by little things they do. Of course this only works if you're friends with the person.

This is the most fucked up thing ever posted to ILX.

ModJ, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean, sorry... but it is.

ModJ, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Dude, you clearly haven't been reading ILX very long.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:29 (twenty-one years ago)

How much have ILX have you read?

(ha ha X-POST HILARITY!)

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)

D'oh! Delete either A) one of those "have"s or B) my brane.

My friend the other day suggested putting "a moratorium on [her] crush". I think this is a good idea.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Unrequited crushes? Don't actually hurt anyone (except the crusher)

This is bullshit because it's making the assumption that all unrequited crushes never go beyond the level of longing from afar and twee romantic comedy lusting. You just have to search on ILE to see really creepy examples of this not being the case.

This is not directed at anyone in particular lest anyone get paranoid again, though I know that is a Kate quote I'm replying to.

amazing jetpack? (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Tom is otm. I think in romantic relationships it's always incredibly easy to fall into a pattern and assume that that's your lot and learn to enjoy it or something. I don't have the long term crush ailment I don't think, but I do have a habit of getting into relationships with people who can't commit, cos they aren't single or cos they are evil. I think it's easy to then say "oh yeah I love it" and part of you might.

But you can't admit this to yourself or allow it to fester or become true.

I think the same is true of people who are single and constantly whine about it, if you make being single a public issue and whinge endlessly about it then you become a single person. It fulfills itself.

I don't claim to be an expert on relationships but I am fairly certain that all the above is good advice and that the old cliche of be yourself or more pertinently stay yourself, is a good one if you really want to be happy. Really happy I mean. It is about focussing on the positive.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)

The other day I considered putting my crush in a mortuary.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Ally, unrequited crushing is NOT the same thing as stalking. That's dangerous, not to mention faulty logic.

Not all people who drink alcohol become alcoholics. Not all people who have unrequited crushes turn stalker. Generalisation is dangerous.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:48 (twenty-one years ago)

not all generalisations are dangerous

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:50 (twenty-one years ago)

okay yes, my post does make me sound a bit stalker-ish. It's just this thread reminded me of a conversation I was having with my friends when we were talking about crushes. Basically we came to the conclusion that if you're not really ready to have a proper relationship, crushes can be fun because they give you a focus for any yearning thoughts you're having, and you get to gossip about them with your friends, but you don't have the hassle of actually connecting with people. Of course as tom pointed out this can be damaging as well. But it can be fun for a while. I'm actually seeing someone at the moment, and my crush has sort of subsided into friendship, except maybe I look forward to seeing him more than my other friends, or I feel happy if he rings or something. But I don't want anything more from it.

I think I've just complicated my point, but you know...not a stalker, okay? honest.

kathryn m (kathryn m), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Crushes are fine as long as you don't confuse them with love.

NA (Nick A.), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Ally, unrequited crushing is NOT the same thing as stalking. That's dangerous, not to mention faulty logic.

So basically, Kate, what you are saying here is that there is absolutely no middle ground between harmless behavior and full on stalking? Black and white viewpoints are far more dangerous than so-called generalizations...

I'm not naming names, but rest assured the specific examples I'm thinking of are NOT stalkers. They are, however, creepy, obnoxious, and upsetting when they crop up in my life. They are in no way threatening me or showing up at my doorstep or following me around (well in most cases) but it still impacts me in a negative way nonetheless.

basically bnw OTM upthread, unsurprisingly. I've never had a long-term unrequited crush so I don't know how "rewarding" that is.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:03 (twenty-one years ago)

(it's not)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not saying that there is no middle ground, but that there IS a continuum.

The funny thing is, a lot of crushees who claim that the attention is negative - still somehow manage to encourage the crush. Maybe it's because they feel they want to be "nice" and not hurt the crusher, maybe it's because secretly they ARE getting something out of the arrangement, in the form of an ego boost.

I'm not confusing that with *geniune* stalking - where the stalker is genuinely disturbed and interprets encouragement where there is none.

But my experience of crushees is that if they are aware of the crush and do nothing to stop it, often it is because they are complicit. If you don't make it clear that the attention is unwanted, then to a certain extent, you warrant the attention that you get.

Yeah, I know I'm treading dangerously close to Camille Paglia ground here, but really.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Besides, when you say that your examples are NOT stalkers, well... dictionary definition says - if you have made it clear that the attention is unwanted, and the person continues the attention, that may not legally be stalking, but it legally IS harrassment (well, in some jurisdictions anyway) and has passed beyond the status of harmless crush.

Funny thing is, 80% of crushes of the sort we are describing, the crushee is probably oblivious to the fact that there is a serious crush. So no, there really is no harm.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:12 (twenty-one years ago)

So basically they're asking for it?

Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:12 (twenty-one years ago)

No. That's not what I said.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:15 (twenty-one years ago)

There is a difference between "asking for it" and "consciously or subconsciously complicit".

If someone is paying you unwanted attention and you ask them to stop, and they continue, there is no "oh, they're NOT stalking but crushes are still bad" - legally they are harrassing you. It's gone beyond a crush.

There is a large grey area. Some people have more imagination, there are mixed messages, etc. etc. etc. I never said there was a hard and fast line between unrequited crushing and stalking, but they are NOT the same thing.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:18 (twenty-one years ago)

A very sucky thing about unrequited crushes and playing in a band = when the not-quite-a-stalker-yet-but-almost unrequited-by-you-crushor comes to every one of your shows and stands down in front and when you're done performing waits around to talk to you while you hide in the tiny little "backstage" area (glorified janitor's closet).

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Kate, might I point out that YOU were the one who brought up stalking to begin with?

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)

"Going beyond twee lusting from afar" /= immediately equal "stalking"

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)

See, Nickalicious, that's a grey area. You want the person as a fan, but not as a romantic partner, so there is endless possibility for mixed messages and misunderstandings.

And please, Ally, I'm not trying to discount or dismiss your experiences. I've been on the receiving end of stalking, and I've also been on the giving end of crushes that went too far - I know how scary and how powerful both experiences can be.

But I interpreted your post to say that all unrequited crushes are potential stalker situations, and that's just ridiculous.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)

ha ha ha
http://www.boxofficeprophets.com/images/amelie.jpg

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:23 (twenty-one years ago)

This thread has gone wrong.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Your interpretation was off the mark and completely an overreaction, Kate. Sorry. Like I said, there's a MASSIVE grey area between "stalking" and "harmless" and your reply indicates you seem to think that by being in the grey area you still fall into the realm of "harmless" for the object of affection, which isn't necessarily true and I don't think that the viewpoint of the person being crushed on is ever really considered on threads like this.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Crushes if not serious can be classic - take the office crush I take up in every job to make the day go a bit quicker. I don't actually fancy my current office crush but I have a soft spot for him and am always pleased to see him out and about. wearing pink again.

But if it's serious then it's rubbish (but not so rubbish that you want to stop).

Especially if you've liked someone for over a year and then you just give up on it and start going out with someone else, but within the safety of another relationship you decide you're going to tell your former crush and it turns out that he's disappointed and fancied you all that time. And even though you've both finally admitted you like each other. Still nothing happens.

Some people you make moves on. Some people make moves on you. But there are some times when you ought to and they ought to but neither does and you both keep floating on in this weird little nether world and that's all there is. And sometimes it turns into a very nice friendship that you probably couldn't have with anyone else, if you hadn't both fancied each other once and never done anything about it.

nickie (nickie), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:30 (twenty-one years ago)

But my experience of crushees is that if they are aware of the crush and do nothing to stop it, often it is because they are complicit. If you don't make it clear that the attention is unwanted, then to a certain extent, you warrant the attention that you get.

There are a lot of people who fear confrontation. I don't think the failure to confront someone or tell them to stop should always equal being consciously or subconsciously complicit in the crush.

Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Weeelllll... I see your point. But still. Learning how to say "no" is something which is a valuable skill in all aspects of life. No one is a mind-reader. (Except that bloke who bends spoons and shoots himself in the head, and who wants to be like that?)

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:55 (twenty-one years ago)

N otm, wasn't this a fairly mild mannered but clever discussion a few minutes ago?

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Both of you posting that you feel it's now hotheaded and stupid really helps matters, Ronan! You both get medals for being Captains of the Obvious.

Nicole OTM.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:14 (twenty-one years ago)

wasn't this a fairly mild mannered but clever discussion a few minutes ago?

Change 'discussion' to 'janitor' and you have an episode of Hong Kong Phooey.

N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

nickalicious OTM

Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:18 (twenty-one years ago)

What, misunderstandings and overreactions heating up the moment that Ally gets involved in a thread? NEVAH!!!

(j/k, honestly)

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Knock Knock


Who's there?


Interrupting Sheep.


Interrupting Sheep Wh-BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:29 (twenty-one years ago)

(insert photo of Millar giving the finger here)

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I am stalking all of you.

Richey Manic (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I have a huge ass!

Julian Casablancas (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)

(I think this is the level of discussion preferred by N. and Ronan?)

(also I have an amazing jetpack, fuck off everyone)

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Leave me alone.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)

You butted yourself in for no apparent reason, you were asking for it.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:44 (twenty-one years ago)

That's not Ronan's butt, that's mine.

Julian Casablancas (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I secretly prefer Ronan.

Jimmy Fallon (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I did have a reason! I thought it was a good thread which people would be willing to post to for a while. Anyway it's not worth my argument.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:51 (twenty-one years ago)

So I guess pointing out that people were posting to it and you basically insulted myself, Kate and Nicole is unnecessary at this point? This is why you get teased.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyway it's all gone to cobblers now.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you want to know how the FUCKING AMAZING TOMBOT gets over weird unrequited and hopeless crushes? How does he make it look so EASY?(1.)

Well have you ever had to get up early in the morning? Have you ever had to do the gross dishes? Have you ever had to clean a toilet? How about get a job, or make a doctor's appointment, or get a haircut? Some of these things might seem easy and some of them might be the kinds of things you avoid at all costs. But eventually you do them because eventually you realize that you HAVE TO. And once you realize that, somehow it gets done!!! It's like sorcery!!!

Getting over a crush is just like that. You go 'I have to get over this person, this is making me behave like a ridiculous chimpanzee' and then you go and discipline your mind to stop thinking of the crushee as the best thing that could ever possibly happen to you in your entire life and go about the business of living.

I wouldn't be nearly as terse about all this if I hadn't spent such a great deal of my youth as well acting the fool for some girl I had no chance with. It's absurd behavior and I still don't buy a word of Kate's arguments that it does any good, if you need to always be thinking about some random infatuation to improve yourself or be creative then there are other issues at hand which fortunately don't belong in this discussion.

1. It's not easy(a.)

a. I never said it was anyway.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, I don't need to say that I don't buy or understand any of your dismissals of my arguments, because you know what? You're an unthinking, unfeeling robot of a human being, and if all that required to change yourself was to wake up one morning and say "I'm going to CHANGE" then for fucks sake everyone would have done it by now.

Don't tell me what's right for me, and I won't tell you what's right for robots.

kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

http://side7.gundam.com/the_gundam_box/reviews/zeta03.jpg
I'm the operator with my pocket calculator.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:15 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.newscientist.com/hottopics/ai/img/likehuman1.jpg

Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Defective models there.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)

The other day I considered putting my crush in a mortuary.

-- N. (nickdastoo...), October 7th, 2003. (later)

Only the other day? It's more like "the other minute" with me.

And having just spoken to my own personal heroin, I'm changing my vote to dud dud dud dud dud. Absolute drain on time, effort, and emotion, leaving the crusher pretty much dead to the world and unable to operate functionally with other human beings.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I can honestly say this has never happened to me.

Sean (Sean), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:38 (twenty-one years ago)

i believe time in either goole or calais may help

charltonlido (gareth), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Whappen?
That all went tits up.

Anyway:

Hearing far more than is there in a piece of music because of wacked-up emotional life - c/d

For anutha day, perhaps.

Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Crushes are kinda good to start off with, but then they sorta run out of steam. Probably because I don't act on them, and just sit around being whimsical and looking for clues.

jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)

people have crushes on people because they are vibrant and exciting and charismatic and have seemingly interesting lives, they want a piece of that, to be part of that.

be one of those people, maybe people will have crushes on you then. in fact, maybe your own crush will stop seeing you as an irritant, trying to get a piece of their life, and start seeing you as a cool person with an exciting life of their own, they might even want a piece of that

lead a life that others want to be a part of.

charltonlido (gareth), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Enrique is right - crushes are to indie as E is to house.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:04 (twenty-one years ago)

or at least, appear to lead a life that others might want to be part of

charltonlido (gareth), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah! I stopped having so many crushes when I went metal. However, at high school the soundtrack to my crushes was Poison and Skid Row, especially "I Remember You".

jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)

"or at least, appear to lead a life that others might want to be part of"

Thats it!!! I'm going to become a real-lfe bon-fide pirate!

jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you want to know how the FUCKING AMAZING TOMBOT gets over weird unrequited and hopeless crushes?

Sure, but if the FAT thinks that he can tell me that I am empowered to do the same, he's talking out of his shiny metal ass.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Tombot's post has got me thinking about ridiculous chimpanzees and that's got me thinking about what if there were responsible, calm, cool, collected, ambitious chimps out there, you know, going for it, doing what it takes. I wanna meet that chimp and shake his hand.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Sure, but if the FAT thinks that he can tell me that I am empowered to do the same, he's talking out of his shiny metal ass.

Andrew, for a minute there you had me thinking you had read the Mo'Nique book.

Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:56 (twenty-one years ago)

total dud if the "someone" is your SO and the crusher persists with his nothingness

half jack, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)

I think Charlton Lido is dreamy!!!!!! OMG WTF!!!!!!!!!

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)

try this:
http://versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/21121 (x-post)

Orbit (Orbit), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 19:47 (twenty-one years ago)

So I guess pointing out that people were posting to it and you basically insulted myself, Kate and Nicole is unnecessary at this point? This is why you get teased.


Oh look I'm sorry, I really didn't feel teased for what it's worth since I didn't actually think this was really an argument or you were really bothered. I'm surprised you mind but I suspect and hope you don't really mind too much. I just criticised what the thread had become in that it was boiling into argument but now it has even moreso.

I really don't know what else to say, I could argue more but I don't want to really cos normally we get along and it seems fairly trivial now.

I think this thread is quite a sensitive subject with people and not the easiest thing to discuss. That's why I felt it had gone wrong. I don't speak for N or have no idea what he thinks or why he thinks what he posted, just for the record.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:16 (twenty-one years ago)

but hey I am flattered that I managed to pass myself off as twee and teased above!

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Ronan I was kidding!! U r 2 EZ.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:23 (twenty-one years ago)

leave me alone.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't like you anymore, I like that Charlton character.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:27 (twenty-one years ago)

But he looks like a thunderbird! I have seen him!

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I like what Kathryn wrote about crushes. They are like training wheels for relationships. And I would think the kind of crush where you giggle with your friends lets you retain enough control that you will realise when it is annoying the crushee and stop.

isadora (isadora), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:53 (twenty-one years ago)

if you saw a grown man riding around the street with training wheels, what would you think?

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:58 (twenty-one years ago)

(note: he does not have a clown nose)

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:58 (twenty-one years ago)

so his nose is just naturally like that? poor guy.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 21:01 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.rhubbard.com/pix/pictures-2000/02-02-00%20RW%20Red%20Nose.jpg

amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought for sure that would be a Jimmy Durante pic.

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 21:07 (twenty-one years ago)

if you saw a grown man riding around the street with training wheels, what would you think?

"Worth crossing the street to avoid", while sprinting across

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 22:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Ok, Ronan, that Thunderbird comment just made me like you better again.

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 23:38 (twenty-one years ago)

it's classic when you're young. dud after 20 or so. i can't imagine an instance where the crushee doesn't know they're being crushed upon. so the fact they aren't doing anything kinda says how they feel about it. unless the crush doesn't know their crusher at all. which is classic. but in this case you shouldn't say anything because actually knowing the person will crush your crush.

lolita corpus (lolitacorpus), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 01:39 (twenty-one years ago)

If you want to get over a crush, just imagine them taking a big difficult shit. I can't remember where i heard that advice, but it is gold.

Nellie (nellskies), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 01:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Dud, especially when it turns out the crushee had a crush on you at one time, but you were completely oblivious.

As for getting over it - just stop torturing yourself by interacting with the other person as often (or at all, if outside of crush-status, they aren't your friend). Sooner or later, the crush will fade.

More distance = more objectivity, so it's easier to see his or her flaws, too.

miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 02:54 (twenty-one years ago)

My life is empty without crushes.

Sexual display is all, sexual display is everything.

You get over the crush when you no longer need whatever it is that the crush is representing (that you feel you are missing in your life).

kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I have never had a crush.

Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Dud, especially when it turns out the crushee had a crush on you at one time, but you were completely oblivious.

Are you kidding? That wd *rool*. That's the whole point of crushing! It never happens, though, obv. Or does it? Maybe, just maybe... No: a heads-up is in order: it's *never the case*. Unless, who knows...?

Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Yessssssssssssss! I guessed right how to do italics!

Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I actually feel sorry for people who have never had crushes.

Like I said, I've had at least two situations in my life where I had a crush on a person, did nothing cause I was too shy, and found out ages later that the crush was returned. So maybe that's why I'm a little bit more forward about finding out now.

kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:26 (twenty-one years ago)

to me a crush is pointless.
it's love at first sight with me, or its nothing.
no room for maybes, hence, no crushes.

Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:27 (twenty-one years ago)

If I have a crush on someone for long enough, I find that I don't mind that they don't like me back. I guess I never imagine that I'll figure in their happiness. On the other hand, it would be hard to say nothing the whole time. I usually give myself away.

youn, Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:32 (twenty-one years ago)

slut!

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Ha ha, I make people pay and pay.

(Whore!)

kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:36 (twenty-one years ago)

In my experience - love at first sight is a dangerous and harmful myth. Love is not something magical and instant, it is something organic that grows slowly and takes time and mutual effort.

The idea of love at first sight is one of the most damaging myths ever to install unrealistic expectations in people's romantic relationships.

kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:38 (twenty-one years ago)

well it resulted in:
one ten year marriage
and
one eight year domestic partnership

so i can't see that i'm doing any worse than people who go through boyfriends like tissue (one this year, one the next etc)

Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:43 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't necessarily believe in love at first sight, but it doesnt have to be that slow.
x-post

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:45 (twenty-one years ago)

And if those relationships were not happy - and you seem to go on at great length about how not good they were - then maybe you are doing worse?

It bears thinking about how one measures a "successful" relationship.

kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:47 (twenty-one years ago)

And if those relationships were not happy - and you seem to go on at great length about how not good they were - then maybe you are doing worse?

Please provide an example of where I have gone on at length about how they were not happy. I have not done so. You are being presumptuous.

Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Tissues? One a year?

Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not going to dig back through acres of posts, but yeah. You have, Orbit. How about an entire thread called "When someone you love is being a complete idiot" or words to that effect?

You're right, I don't know you well. I'm just going by the attitude that (I infer) you project on this board.

kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:54 (twenty-one years ago)

That thread had nothing to do with either of those relationships.
Don't assume.

Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:55 (twenty-one years ago)

I cannot help if people judge my posting by their own lens. I think it very obnoxious for people to think they know what is going on in my life, and to think they know what I am thinking, who I am writing about, and my relationship history.

Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the point Kate is making here is that I don't think the rule of 'love at first sight or nothing' can apply to everyone here. Also, how do you quantify a 'successful realtiosnhip'?

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:59 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, whatever. I can clearly and plainly tell that you've never made an assumption in your life, obviously.

Everything you write on ILE is filtered through your own lense, as shown by the advice you are giving to the person on this thread, AS YOU YOURSELF ADMIT, (as with your "been there, done that" part of your post) so why are you having a go at me for reading and responding to ILE through my own filter?

Hypocrite.

kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Kate is referring to the (erroneous) idea that everything I post to ILE is about Chris Barrus (the eight year relationship). It is NOT. ILE get over it. We did.

Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry, on the "stood up" thread.

Whoa! Oh boy, who's making assumptions now, Chelsea? My impression of you is formed more by YOUR OWN BEHAVIOUR on this board than any pre-existing knowledge about your previous relationships.

You are a total fucking hypocrite.

kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I am sure ILE is not dwelling on your relationship Orbit.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Ok, explain my behavior Kate. What exactly is the problem?
Yes, I have had many relationships, a lot of experience. Some of it was not good, and I am candid about it. That does not make me a hypocrite. I just thought the subtext was pretty obvious, and figured it best to just put it out there. I apologize if I have misinterpreted you.

I have had many people privately email me expressing the exact sentiment that everything I post is somehow related to Chris. I am glad if no one is dwelling on it, but some evidently are. As I said, those who are dwelling on it should get over it. Those who aren't are much appreciated.

Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:06 (twenty-one years ago)

::gets popcorn::

Pablo Cruise (chaki), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:13 (twenty-one years ago)

sorry man, show's over!

Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:14 (twenty-one years ago)

You are a hypocrite because you accuse me of making assumptions - when the problem with your behavious is that YOU yourself are making the assumptions about ME - the assumption that I'm somehow filtering everything you post through some "Chris Filter" or something.

The ironic thing is, when I met you I actually liked you a lot, we had a great time and I came away with a very positive impression of you. Online, I get a quite different impression.

Fair enough, the internet does strange thing to people's personalities and the perception thereof. There are a number of people on ILX that I get along fine with IRL, yet have a bad reaction to on ILX, and vice versa.

You assume that I am responding negatively towards you because I've got a "Chris Filter" when the truth is, I am responding negatively towards your posts and your posting style. I don't presume to tell other people how they should or shouldn't post on ILE (beyond simple nettiquette) and I know that there are a number of people who object to my posts, and *my* posting style.

You rant on that people who are "dwelling on it should get over it" but you know what? Perhaps you need to get over the giant "Chris Chip One Your Shoulder" and stop making assumptions about us.

I don't want to debate about this, and I don't want to fight about it. We are different people, we have had different experiences and we have different approaches towards relationships. That's why there's chocolate AND vanilla.

kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Um, whatever, This is obviously more significant to you than it is to me. I'm sorry that voice and tone don't carry over into posting.

I agree about chocolate and vanilla.

Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Chaki can I get a 40?

Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I still feel sorry for people who have never experienced the thrill of the agony and the ecstacy of a good crush. It is one of the most enjoyable experiences in life.

kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:23 (twenty-one years ago)

i aint a playa i just crush alot. no i really do. :/

Pablo Cruise (chaki), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:25 (twenty-one years ago)

So does that mean you're a mack daddy then? (that is question that I now Ask Chaki)

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:27 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.catclothesvintage.com/music/rockabilly/casey-sisters/bio/casey-sisters-catfight.jpg

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:28 (twenty-one years ago)

no i usually fuck everything up

Pablo Cruise (chaki), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Is that photo from a never-released Russ Meyer meets John Waters film?

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Dude, I had no fucking idea that Orbit and Chris Barrus dated long term, wtf? Why you gotta go and broadcast that shit and force everyone to think about it? Jesus god.

ANYWAY I have had crushes but they they are never ever long term crushing situations cos I forget about them if I don't end up dating the person. Also 80% of them have been on, for example, Batman or the leader dude from Voltron so I guess that isn't really the same thing as what this thread is talking about.

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 12:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I kind of had a long term crush on Richey Edwards I suppose. And also Han Solo. HAN SOLO: Why wouldn't he go out with me? Etc.

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 12:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey, if it counts for Friendster...

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 12:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Seriously, can you blame me though?

http://www.dpo.uab.edu/~marcus/cels/voltron/voltron-keith2.jpg

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:16 (twenty-one years ago)

No, he's dreamy.

Nicolars (Nicole), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't understand why he hooked up with that stupid pink-wearing bitch Aurora, wtf is that nonsense?

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Keith was too uptight. Sven, the real blue lion before the princess fuct it all up, is where its at.
http://members.aol.com/Stuperbc/sven3.jpg

bnw (bnw), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Dude, yeah, he's got much better hair, Keith kind of had a mullet. Also: the name Sven is hot.

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Don't forget Ken from G-Force. Few guys can pull off the bird helmet.

bnw (bnw), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:48 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.absoluteanime.com/g-force/ken-.jpg
(I think I killed this thread.)

bnw (bnw), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:49 (twenty-one years ago)

dude, seriously, you are totally wrong on that one.

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Ken had nothing on Joe/Jason. The brooding! The angst! Ach!

kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:56 (twenty-one years ago)

There's a whole new thread for this! We should stop "ruining" this one.

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Now that nickalicious posted a pic of Amelie I've gotta dmit I crush on her. Just a little bit, oh yes.

Thing is, and I don't know quite how I'm going to break this to myself...but...she's...fictional!

I don't want the actress, I want Amelie. The things she does and the way she thinks.

Oh, my love will never be requited!

mei (mei), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)

She's a fucking moron.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 19:29 (twenty-one years ago)

For the first time in recorded history I'm in agreement with N.

Nicolars (Nicole), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)

This is like the three-peat of thoughts! Cos N. read my goddamn mind.

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 19:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I meant for not wanting to go out with him.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 19:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Amelie is basically the live-action personification of every single girl that has ever been gangbanged on a subway train by naughty tentacle demons in every hentai ever. Hence corny indie fuckers having crushes on her, natch.

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 8 October 2003 19:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Harharhar. With extra glow-in-the-dark willies.

Sarah (starry), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 20:00 (twenty-one years ago)

What a lovely image. Allow me to go off an hate humanity even more now.

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 20:10 (twenty-one years ago)

I love you, crazy-ass thread!
http://www.stp.uh.edu/vol66/72/shobiz/limp.jpg

If a crush is intolerable (I find ones with famous people and people you don't have to deal with kinda nice. A reminder there are people out there you still dig plus you can have many at the same time), either let 'em know and/or get cooler about your life without them. Most of the time I spent pining away for somebody was in part because I didn't like the way things were for me. That said, I will marry Kelly Osbourne and our children will be named Maverick and Anastasia. Peace out.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 9 October 2003 01:19 (twenty-one years ago)

if anyone has a crush on me NOW is the time come forward, not later

gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 9 October 2003 01:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey, spill now, take care of the aftermath later. At least, that appears to be my modus operandi for these situations.

Let me tell you how my mind works in re: one of my "silly celeb crushes" (in this case, I'll be describing the one I have on Nick Rhodes):

Well, I think Nick Rhodes is gorgeous, right? And if I were to actually befriend him* and then he were to express any interest in me**, I'd definitely go for him. But at the same time, I can be a third-party viewer of his relationships and root for him to find a decent, lovely girl (a la Madeleine Farley), feel a bit noncommittal about a female I'm not 100% sure about (a la Lady Victoria Hervey), and boo and hiss over a female who is clearly not worth his while (a la Tara Palmer Tompkinson). Plus, I can swoon and stare at photos of Nick without feeling that I *must* have that sort of feeling reciprocated. I'm generally realistic about my thoughts of how any interaction between him and me should be like.

*: The chances of this happening are slim to none, sure, but certainly larger than my chances of winning the lottery.

**: The chances of this happening are even slimmer and more nonexistent, but again, certainly larger than my chances of winning the lottery.

Now, I have had a real, true crush on someone else for awhile, btw, someone whom I've viewed as a friend, and have admitted it to him, but it's only been now that I've been able to figure out what to do with it. I figure that it's pointless to try to deny my feelings for him, but it's also pointless to expect anything to develop from it. Plus, he's involved with someone else at this point. So I figure I'll compartmentalize my feelings for this person -- I'll keep my friendly feelings toward him separate from my "crush" feelings, and I'll treat this crush like I would a "silly celeb crush", except with benefits because a friendship's already there (so yay for that!).

There. All out in black and white. Ta-daaaaa.

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Thursday, 9 October 2003 03:39 (twenty-one years ago)

OH YEAH! And I wouldn't exactly go over to Nick Rhodes and tell him I've had a crush on him or anything, but I *would* admit to him that I have admired him for awhile. Though that's not exactly due to a lack of "guts", you know. I'd say that's more like a distinct distaste toward being served with a restraining order in regards to the celeb in question.

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Thursday, 9 October 2003 03:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I've had lots of crushes where I never said anything. Some were probably pretty obvious, most not so much. One of the obvious and particularly embarrassing: a guy that I was drunk around a lot of the time (working at a brewery, getting free beer after work. great fun). A few of us were having a discussion of underwear once and I could not imagine how someone could choose to go commando all the time, as this guy claimed. So I decided he was teasing and kept pulling at his pants to find the edge of his underwear. I wasn't trying to get into his pants, I was just convinced that he MUST be wearing underwear of some sort. Really. I had quite the drunken persistence. I think it was pretty apparent that I liked him.

JuliaA (j_bdules), Thursday, 9 October 2003 03:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I have an "ILE crush" on gabbo, but I'm a guy which doesn't help, especially as I only like girls. But anyway. Also TOMBOT-OTM.

(If this thread has 244 serious responses has Fugs won or lost?)

solo, Thursday, 9 October 2003 05:02 (twenty-one years ago)

(referring to upthread, too lazy to read everything afterwards)

I have had 'love at first sight' but must agree with Kate. It's crap. Real, lasting love takes a lot more work than that. It's not instantenous. (and if you think it is it's pretty much destined to let you down.)

A Girl Named Sam (thatgirl), Thursday, 9 October 2003 05:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I think love at first sight needs its own thread. Dammit, why does my boss have to be at her desk today?

kate (kate), Thursday, 9 October 2003 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)

She's a fucking moron.
-- N. (nickdastoo...), October 8th, 2003.

What, Amelie?

Sure she _looks_ cute, but of the way the film is narrated and yr told what she's thinking you get to know the unusual way she thinks.

The things she does bring magic into the world. She goes to so much trouble.

Hence corny indie fuckers having crushes on her, natch. TOMBOT

Oh no! I'm indie! Why didn't anyone tell me?

mei (mei), Thursday, 9 October 2003 09:22 (twenty-one years ago)

ain't nobody indier than me and i find amelie utterly vile

the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:00 (twenty-one years ago)

what in the hell is love at first sight? how can you love someone at first sight?

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I bought some t-shirts in a big chainstore a couple of months ago and as I came up to the counter and the girl on the check out lifted her face up to look at me there was a moment of intense, involuntary interaction between us.

Her pupils dilated (I guess mine did too) and she smiled in a _very_ interesting way. I thought she was gorgeous and I'm pretty sure she liked the look of me too.

We politeley exchanged money for goods, and smiles for smiles.
In soft voices we cordially thanked each other and I left.

Made my day, week and month. Need to go back there soon.

*******************************************************
It may not be love, but that's 'love at first sight' :-)

mei (mei), Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:07 (twenty-one years ago)

no, thats lust.

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:10 (twenty-one years ago)

TLML = sheriff of words!

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Lady Lurex, you're on the wrong thread. We are discussing this on the "LAFS" thread. The consensus is that LAFS is something only established with hindsight, the conjunction of that first prick of WOW! call it lust or whatever, combined with the blossoming of a successful relationship, leads people to decide with hindsight that it was love at first sight. Even though many people have the WOW! without the relationship develop, and relationships develop without the WOW!

Funnily enough, the only true "love at first sight" experience that I feel I had that was positive was the longest-term crush I've ever had, and the long-term crush that turned out to have been reciprocated. What would you call that? Mutual long-term unspoken crush at first sight?

(And does "at first sight" count if you've already been primed with a phone conversation first?)

kate (kate), Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:26 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, you might have noticed i've since moved this topic to the other thread.

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:30 (twenty-one years ago)

in answer to the original thread question, just say something. rejection ain't THAT big a deal.

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:41 (twenty-one years ago)

But at the moment of rejection (and those leading up to it), it is EVERYTHING.

oops (Oops), Thursday, 9 October 2003 18:43 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah but at some point you go, "okay, i've experienced rejection before, its nowhere near as awful as the year i spent getting over a long term relationship, i think i can handle it." rejection sucks, but its what, a day or two of feeling like shit?

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Friday, 10 October 2003 02:26 (twenty-one years ago)

well maybe its different for other people.

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Friday, 10 October 2003 02:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, I think Di has hit the U&K thing on the head. Rejection is awful and horrible to someone who has either never experienced it at all, or else to someone who has never experienced *acceptance*.

There is a point that you can build rejection into such a big, awful thing in your head that would really be a whole lot better for you if you got it over with.

But there's also a point where, if you've never experienced anything *but* rejection, you can give up even wanting to try. Because you've never got a reward.

kate (kate), Friday, 10 October 2003 07:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I certainly think that it is worth taking the risk. Rejection is never very nice granted, but if they don't reject you, how great would you feel then?

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 10 October 2003 07:10 (twenty-one years ago)

two years pass...
much rather have the pain than the longing; would rather grieve over her absence than over her

cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:33 (nineteen years ago)

you mean 'better to say something'?

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:42 (nineteen years ago)

I'm very foolish

cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:43 (nineteen years ago)

Cozen, why do you keep reviving these awful threads? Are you in love with someone or what?

Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:44 (nineteen years ago)

leave him alone

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:45 (nineteen years ago)

I imagine if he wanted to be left alone he wouldn't be posting to a message board - duh!

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:48 (nineteen years ago)

no I'm not in love with someone thankyouverymuch; leave me alone

cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:48 (nineteen years ago)

Why, RJG, are you jealous?

You just seem to be reviving/posting on an awful lot of these threads, Cozen, and I wondered if something was up.

Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:50 (nineteen years ago)

this is some of the stuff I'm interested in

cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:55 (nineteen years ago)

has anyone ever 'said something'?

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:56 (nineteen years ago)

Classic - because eventually you realise she (or he) wasn't worth bothering about in the first place and you've escaped getting embroiled in some stupid messy relationship with them

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:56 (nineteen years ago)

or dud -- you don't.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:59 (nineteen years ago)

The deeper you get, the sweeter the pain, don't give up again, until your heart stops beating.

Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:01 (nineteen years ago)

haha omg the thread title brought the same lyrics into my mind.

must be becuz "its never enough"

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:02 (nineteen years ago)

wisdom from mark p on the other thread:

i had emotions for her because she was a good candidate/rough outline of the type of person i thought i desperately needed in my life -> my infatuations picked up from there and i subsconsciously extrapolated her into a hyper-idealized crush. conversely, because i had no grasp on my own agency in literally creating her, the crush felt so strong and so imposing that i feebly identified it as the beginnings of love.

actually, physically *being* with her forced me back into the reality of who she was (nothing bad, just nowhere near what i'd envisioned) and the crush burst like a bubble.

cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:05 (nineteen years ago)

i'm sure i posted to this thread before, back in 2003. that's depressing. maybe mark p is right, but your and her mileage may vary. these days i think 'cut all ties'/bring things to a head/DO SOMETHING.

based on not doing any of these things.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:07 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, Enrique, you were explaining Spacemen 3 to me on this thread. ;-)

Gone back and read the old answers and it sure is weird. I'm trying to remember what was going on in my life at the time, and I can't, really. What a long time ago.

I still think that crushes are more good than bad, courtly love and all that. Better when not acted upon.

Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:11 (nineteen years ago)

This thread makes me want to hug Cozen, but he'd probably be sick.

Mädchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:12 (nineteen years ago)

i am so not clicking 'show all messages'.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:13 (nineteen years ago)

pj harvey's dude once said something.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:15 (nineteen years ago)

also. does courtney love ever have crushes? my guess is not (she'd just shag them)

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:15 (nineteen years ago)

vincent gallo?

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:16 (nineteen years ago)

x-x-x-post, awwww, sorry, Cozen. Those kinds of crushes tend to say more about yourself than they do about the crushee. Even though Tom has long since denied the advice he once gave me in that regard, I still think it holds true.

And Enrique, it is actually worth reading - there are some hillarious bits on this thread. (Some funny at the time, some funny with perspective.)

Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:16 (nineteen years ago)

perhaps I'm being disingenuous but this thread (or its revival) isn't about me people; other than inasmuch as I believe it's best to act on your crushes rather than... not

cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:17 (nineteen years ago)

i agree with cozen.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:18 (nineteen years ago)

on the guest book of my death bed: "people were narcissistic"

cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:18 (nineteen years ago)

I have a crush on all of you!

But you won't all fit in my bed! :-(

Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:18 (nineteen years ago)

also. does courtney love ever have crushes? my guess is not (she'd just shag them)

she crushes on them, then she shags them, or not, if they've any smarts.

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:22 (nineteen years ago)

She nicked the boy I was trying to get off with in my dream last night. The bastard! ::shakes fist::

Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:23 (nineteen years ago)

She shags them, marries them, crushes their balls

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:28 (nineteen years ago)

then perhaps a little nap

Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:30 (nineteen years ago)

Beauty sleep

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:32 (nineteen years ago)

I've been listening to too much New Order lately. When I was younger, those lyrics seemed so profound, but now it's like... what the HECK is he on about?

Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:14 (nineteen years ago)

I don't think Barney ever pretended his lyrics were profound - but it's interesting that other people did!

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:16 (nineteen years ago)

I had practically a whole religion based around them...

I blame the drugs.

Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:17 (nineteen years ago)

Whose drugs - Barney's or yours?

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:18 (nineteen years ago)

i never understood 'shell shock', but i vaguely knew it was a bad idea. cf 'love vigilantes'.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:19 (nineteen years ago)

Both. x-post

Love Vigilantes was about the Fawlkands War, wasn't it?

In the end, you will submit, it's got to hurt you, a little bit.

Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:19 (nineteen years ago)

What do I get out of this, I always try, I always miss...

And 1963 - what the HECK was going on in this song? Did someone get shot? I'm so confused by it.

Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:20 (nineteen years ago)

The difference between fancying someone and having a crush on them is interesting me at the moment. When does one morph into the other? It's only cos I FANCY someone at the mo, but don't think I'm crushing on them, and I'd rather not venture into that dark place if I can help it.

Come Back Johnny B (Johnney B), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:25 (nineteen years ago)

two of their songs are named for nick ray films...

('thieves like us' [='they live by night'] and 'in a lonely place')

The difference between fancying someone and having a crush on them is interesting me at the moment. When does one morph into the other?

i spose it's about how much time u spend building up their character over long teenage sundays spent listening to example given 'pet sounds'.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:27 (nineteen years ago)

And 1963 - what the HECK was going on in this song? Did someone get shot? I'm so confused by it.

JFK!

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:32 (nineteen years ago)

Is it *really* about the JFK assasination? I'd never have known. I will have to go back and listen to it again. But who's "Johnny" then?

Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:34 (nineteen years ago)

It's impressionistic

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:34 (nineteen years ago)

I didn't know that "impressionistic" was synonymous with "complete codswollop".

Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:35 (nineteen years ago)

ER, JANUARY?

Lee Harvey Oswald (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:37 (nineteen years ago)

More synonymous with "Making it up as you go along" or "Have you fookin' finished those lyrics yet Barney, ya lazy twat" (xpost)

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:37 (nineteen years ago)

Aw, don't pick on Barney. I heart Barney. Even if he's been hitting the pies lately.

Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 13:35 (nineteen years ago)

"1963" is about a hypothetical situation where the JFK shoots Jackie so that he could run off with Marilyn Monroe, IIRC.

Dan (Hypotheticals) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:01 (nineteen years ago)

I brought things to a head once. It helped me grow up, I suppose.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:10 (nineteen years ago)

This happened to me once...it makes a real twat of you. Move on.

[jailhouse tattoo] (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:11 (nineteen years ago)

Definitely the right advice, you'll feel like a fool afterwards, that's if you don't get chewed up and spat out. On the plus side if you come out the victor you can have one up on the person forever, and really enjoy never returning their calls.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:14 (nineteen years ago)

VICTORY!

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:20 (nineteen years ago)

imagine being happy

cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 22 December 2005 11:03 (nineteen years ago)

no; that's silly

I take that back

cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 22 December 2005 11:04 (nineteen years ago)

At high school, I would usually have a crush on a girl for about 6-9 months, then I would move on to having a new crush.

jel -- (jel), Thursday, 22 December 2005 11:05 (nineteen years ago)

“No! Not just anytime! Only if it’s funny!”
—Roger Rabbit

For “funny” (and for “unchristian”), read instantly effective, or atmosphere-charging, or ludicrous, or self-denying, or generally wrong-footing of such of the world as obtains in one’s immediate vicinity. When you have no opinion on an issue, it cannot be ‘wrong’ to invent one, simply to explore what happens when you make it known.

cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 22 December 2005 11:06 (nineteen years ago)

At high school, I would usually have a crush on a girl for about 6-9 months, then I would move on to having a new crush.
-- jel -- (freeduni...), December 22nd, 2005.

yeah, i had this, and then one lasting about 5 years.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 22 December 2005 11:09 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

ok fuck i just wrote one amazing love-letter. leaving it in her pigeonhole tomorrow morning. may divulge contents at later date. jeez am i nervous.

Just got offed, Saturday, 20 October 2007 02:39 (seventeen years ago)

i wanna c on d baby

elan, Saturday, 20 October 2007 05:18 (seventeen years ago)

you probably should've just put it in her mailbox

remy bean, Saturday, 20 October 2007 05:34 (seventeen years ago)

if you value your soul do not divulge anything here.

gff, Saturday, 20 October 2007 06:12 (seventeen years ago)

have you learned nothing

gff, Saturday, 20 October 2007 06:12 (seventeen years ago)

Yep, they're right. Don't dare say anything here.

I've been grappling with this of late, but I've just decided it's best not to speak to the beloved in real terms. I will never tell them I love them. Ever. They are just going to have to figure it out.

Bimble, Saturday, 20 October 2007 06:53 (seventeen years ago)

ok no divulging. but the deed is done. gonna need a bit more sleep to think on things.

Just got offed, Saturday, 20 October 2007 07:57 (seventeen years ago)

can you post the letter in this thread? we can offer constructive criticism and encouragement : )

omar little, Saturday, 20 October 2007 08:05 (seventeen years ago)

"leaving it in her pigeonhole"

Someone start a "fave names for vagina" poll.

nathalie, Saturday, 20 October 2007 08:19 (seventeen years ago)

Oh baby don't it feel like heaven right now
Don't it feel like something from a dream
Yeah I've never known nothing quite like this
Don't it feel like tonight might never be again
We know better than to try and pretend
Baby no one could'a ever told me about this
I said yeah yeah

CHORUS
The waiting is the hardest part
Every day you see one more card
You take it on faith, you take it to the heart
The waiting is the hardest part

Well yeah I might have chased a couple women around
All it ever got me was down
Then there were those that made me feel good
But never as good as I'm feeling right now
Baby you're the only one that's ever known how
To make me wanna live like I want to live now
I said yeah yeah

CHORUS
The waiting is the hardest part
Every day you get one more yard
You take it on faith, you take it to the heart
The waiting is the hardest part

Oh don't let it kill you baby, don't let it get to you
Don't let it kill you baby, don't let it get to you
I'll be your bleeding heart, I'll be your crying fool
Don't let this go too far
Don't let it get to you

Just got offed, Saturday, 20 October 2007 21:21 (seventeen years ago)

As long as you didn't end it with "PS I am wanking as I write this".

Noodle Vague, Saturday, 20 October 2007 21:24 (seventeen years ago)

lool

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 20 October 2007 21:26 (seventeen years ago)

the wanking is the hardest part

Just got offed, Saturday, 20 October 2007 21:28 (seventeen years ago)

Gawd, even reading the name of this thread makes my stomach crawl. If I could meet myself when I was 15 I would beat my own face to a pulp and perform roundhouse kicks to my younger spleen, with intermittent elbow drops thrown in for good measure. If you ever experience the other perspective, where someone obviously likes you but is too shy to say anything, it comes across as 30% cute and 70% pathetic.

Z S, Saturday, 20 October 2007 23:06 (seventeen years ago)

. If you ever experience the other perspective, where someone obviously likes you but is too shy to say anything, it comes across as 30% cute and 70% pathetic.

I've heard that.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 20 October 2007 23:11 (seventeen years ago)

the wanking is the hardest part

Bahahaa. Someone *needs* to do a cover of that song and change the lyrics around.

Bimble, Saturday, 20 October 2007 23:28 (seventeen years ago)

holygeez there are like five million damn crush threads
so i'm just going with this one
wait
love letters?
pigeon holes?

maybe i should do parallel experiment
and we could see who wins

haha noo
but really what is awesome is that i have minor crush on someone i really don't even know and who is obv prob rong and yknow am too busy/uh for crushes/things anyway so i'm just going to keep listening to his wacked out radio show that's all!
/sharing

rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:05 (seventeen years ago)

u drunk?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:20 (seventeen years ago)

no
i am just like this today

rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:22 (seventeen years ago)

well 1.5 beers

rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:23 (seventeen years ago)

2

rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:32 (seventeen years ago)

3

elan, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:38 (seventeen years ago)

5

elan, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:38 (seventeen years ago)

7

elan, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:38 (seventeen years ago)

11

elan, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:38 (seventeen years ago)

13

elan, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:38 (seventeen years ago)

17

elan, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:38 (seventeen years ago)

19

elan, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:38 (seventeen years ago)

23

elan, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:38 (seventeen years ago)

damn you are in prime crush territory

elan, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:38 (seventeen years ago)

All hail rrrobyn!!!

Bimble, Sunday, 21 October 2007 01:15 (seventeen years ago)

Dud, and even worse when you're watching it from the sidelines.

Eric H., Sunday, 21 October 2007 01:17 (seventeen years ago)

I once asked Friend X if she was aware of this thing I had for Friend Y and she went "dude, it's kinda obvious. Everybody knows except her."

;_;

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 21 October 2007 01:27 (seventeen years ago)

24

rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 01:38 (seventeen years ago)

going out
maybe he will be there and we can have awkward conversation! lol

rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 01:39 (seventeen years ago)

i don't have awkward conversation anyway
forward
leeward
skyward

rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 01:46 (seventeen years ago)

26

rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 01:46 (seventeen years ago)

547

rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 05:46 (seventeen years ago)

otm

elan, Sunday, 21 October 2007 07:19 (seventeen years ago)

I think love letters are like CVs -- any longer than two sides of paper and you're likely to put the recipient off.

Alba, Sunday, 21 October 2007 09:41 (seventeen years ago)

it was just under one side, written with short sentences and direct prose. the way these things should be.

Just got offed, Sunday, 21 October 2007 09:42 (seventeen years ago)

You and me baby we ain't nothing but mammals.
So let's do it like they do on the Discovery Channel
Yours,
Louis

P.S. I am wanking as I write this.

Alba, Sunday, 21 October 2007 11:17 (seventeen years ago)

I too think love letters are like CVs -- though getting references can be awkward.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 21 October 2007 11:39 (seventeen years ago)

I'm always saying there should be some system for obtaining references from past lovers!

Alba, Sunday, 21 October 2007 11:53 (seventeen years ago)

BANG LOUIS JAGGER

Yours,
Louis

DJ Mencap, Sunday, 21 October 2007 12:05 (seventeen years ago)

looooool

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 21 October 2007 12:06 (seventeen years ago)

only thing worse: saying something

Dr Morbius, Sunday, 21 October 2007 21:06 (seventeen years ago)

If you ever experience the other perspective, where someone obviously likes you but is too shy to say anything, it comes across as 30% cute and 70% pathetic.

Those numbers are only true if the feeling isn't mutual.

Casuistry, Sunday, 21 October 2007 21:31 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, but come on - what are the chances of both people being pathetic?

Alba, Sunday, 21 October 2007 21:32 (seventeen years ago)

in a matter of hours i shall know whether this is a thing. if it is, a twee-er and more overtly 'hullo sky, hullo clouds' LJ will grace these boards. we're talking nuvvieworld-levels here.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 00:12 (seventeen years ago)

if it isn't, the lol britpop zing crew have no idea what's hitting them.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 00:13 (seventeen years ago)

the important thing to note is that i've regarded this girl as well out of my league for over two years now.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 00:15 (seventeen years ago)

scourage!

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 22 October 2007 00:22 (seventeen years ago)

di^^^ment ain't what i need

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 00:27 (seventeen years ago)

good luck, hopefully she has a thing for zingoholics.

estela, Monday, 22 October 2007 00:37 (seventeen years ago)

was supposed to be encouragement, homes. good luck. xpost

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 22 October 2007 00:58 (seventeen years ago)

hey dude I know! i was just making an over-elaborate muse. cheers bro!

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 01:15 (seventeen years ago)

I have a new bf as of last week, and the moment I said so to ppl, a dear friend of mine I had quite a crush on and had given up any hope of having a dalliance with admitted to me he wanted to go out with me.

Let this be a lesson to you, shy men of the world. Grrr grumble.

Trayce, Monday, 22 October 2007 03:50 (seventeen years ago)

i had a huge crush on my best friend. i dropped not-so-subtle hints until he finally told me HE had a crush on me. in retrospect it's now obvious he felt the same way, but at the time i couldn't come right out with it because i was sure he was way out of my league. luckily, he is far braver than me.

ps. YAY FOR TRAYCE! so that's why your fb status is all about not getting enough sleep... ;)

Rubyredd, Monday, 22 October 2007 04:18 (seventeen years ago)

she has the note. the die is cast. also, i have had a brief chat with one of her friends over the issue. the next six or so hours will be nerve-racking.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:19 (seventeen years ago)

White girls from rich families do tend to have something for black guys, so maybe start wearing blackface around campus?

Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:24 (seventeen years ago)

I think my former roommate (girl) had a thing for me (dude) because we had a ton in common and she'd flirt with me pretty ridiculously. She has a daddy complex, so the minute I ask her out she'll probably disappear with some 34 year old dude. Sometimes crushes are best kept to yourslef when it comes to psycho chixxxx. Also, why do girls in their early-mid twenties onyl date older guys?

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/60minutes/20061020/7f5e6cc75ec0e9b9cae9ad26968340bc.jpg

burt_stanton, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:34 (seventeen years ago)

ok dom i can normally enjoy yr 'lol rich' shizzle, but she's from a lower-middle class background if that. wealthy girls are generally a turn-off for me. tend to be up themselves/spoiled/irritatingly precious/unlovable. this girl is genuine, down to earth, fun, everything the toffish ones often aren't. i know you have beef with my uni, and fair enough, but we're not all banker's children with trust funds and affiliations to exclusive 'clubs' which are actually an excuse to get semi-willing girls dressed unsexily in tiny sheafs of fabric really rat-arsed, take advantage of them and then buy them an expensive meal the next day to take their mind off the sordid union. not all. just some.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:35 (seventeen years ago)

guys who get crushes on girls they hardly know for years

=

not the sort of guys those girls would go out with anyway

HARSH

max r, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:37 (seventeen years ago)

but she's from a lower-middle class background

rickjameslyrics_ghettolife.txt

Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:44 (seventeen years ago)

dude i'm not saying she's from a deprived background, i'm just saying that your strawman is faintly ridiculous.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:47 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sprung

Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:49 (seventeen years ago)

exclusive 'clubs' which are actually an excuse to get semi-willing girls dressed unsexily in tiny sheafs of fabric really rat-arsed, take advantage of them and then buy them an expensive meal the next day to take their mind off the sordid union. not all. just some.

-- Just got offed, Monday, October 22, 2007 2:35 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

wait what

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:51 (seventeen years ago)

He's talking about the debating society

Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:52 (seventeen years ago)

hawks' club's really gone downhill /cantab zing

xpost

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:52 (seventeen years ago)

And Louis, I mean this sincerely, if you DO get on a date with this girl, just don't talk about music.

Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:53 (seventeen years ago)

most 'clubs' are like that, enrique, notably the P1tt club. urgh.

sprung is a fair description.

haha, i've made THAT mistake before, dom! things about which i am an aspie (i.e. music, cricket, football) are DEFINITE no-gos.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:55 (seventeen years ago)

you have no chance, forget about her.

max r, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:56 (seventeen years ago)

so anyway, moved to a flat in camden a couple of weeks ago, thought it would be better for my music career to be part of the "scene". my friend tarquin needed a new bassist for his band "the costellos" so, here i am. my dad sorted my out my the place, a rehearsal room, bought me some furniture and musical equipment: a fender jazz bass and a marshall amp, not to mention a strat so i can work on my songwriting.

problem is: dad's only hooking me up with £600 a week, after rent bills, etc.. not really enough to live the rock and roll lifestyle, keep up with the latest fashions and keep a girlfriend in tow, it's really unfair.

so could anyone sort us out with some gigs? you get well paid for them, right?

our drummer went to boarding school with a couple of guys from the horrors, so they might be able to help out, but the music biz is a tough game and any help at all would be appreciated.

-- max r, Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:16 AM (8 hours ago) Bookmark Link

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:57 (seventeen years ago)

you will have to think of some more imaginative ways of suggesting that i be banned than that, quitney.

-- max r, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:19 (38 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:58 (seventeen years ago)

OK now it's the worst thread ever.

-- Matt DC, Monday, 22 October 2007 10:26 (3 hours ago) Bookmark Link

Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:59 (seventeen years ago)

That can't be real. Please tell me that's not real?

Laurel, Monday, 22 October 2007 14:02 (seventeen years ago)

it's a game of 'guess who's trolling'.

would saw PEW but he seems to know england too well.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 14:04 (seventeen years ago)

i kid because i love

max r, Monday, 22 October 2007 14:05 (seventeen years ago)

why do girls in their early-mid twenties onyl date older guys?

hint: think about guys who are younger than early-mid twenties

ken c, Monday, 22 October 2007 14:10 (seventeen years ago)

I don't wanna. Girls on the other hand....

Upt0eleven, Monday, 22 October 2007 14:49 (seventeen years ago)

wealthy girls are generally a turn-off for me. tend to be up themselves/spoiled/irritatingly precious/unlovable.

jesus. way to steareotype. unlovable? harsh

sunny successor, Monday, 22 October 2007 15:38 (seventeen years ago)

i didn't say all of them!

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 15:40 (seventeen years ago)

who doesn't love money? hot + rich = even better.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 15:40 (seventeen years ago)

Given that these things tend to happen for me in weekends, then

-Charlton losing to Wolves
-Worcestershire signing basket-case Simon Jones
-England losing the RWC final

will be followed by a Hamilton cock-up tomorrow.

Just sayin'.

-- Just got offed, Saturday, 20 October 2007 21:03 (Yesterday) Bookmark Link

-- Just got offed, Sunday, 21 October 2007 17:43 (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

my love-letter will also fail to accrue a positive response. it's inevitable. :(

-- Just got offed, Sunday, 21 October 2007 17:53 (Yesterday) Bookmark Link

pretty comprehensively, not a thing.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:07 (seventeen years ago)

What was the response?

Alba, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:10 (seventeen years ago)

her friend called me and said 'yeah she didn't seem very keen...and the bit about forgetting about it and moving on if it wasn't going to happen? do that.'

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:12 (seventeen years ago)

ow, fuck. sorry, dude.

grimly fiendish, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:13 (seventeen years ago)

she'd do well to keep the letter, mind. when i'm famous... ;)

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:18 (seventeen years ago)

thats the spirit

deej, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:19 (seventeen years ago)

that's the spirit!

FUCKING HELL, X-POST!

grimly fiendish, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:20 (seventeen years ago)

Okay LJ. Go out tonight, get hammered, do regrettable shit. DON'T POST ABOUT IT HERE.* In the morning have a shower and a huge breakfast and remind yourself that there's a world of stuff out there still waiting to happen to you, and that in x years time you won't even remember what this shit was about. Line: drawn.

*okay go on then if you want.

Noodle Vague, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:20 (seventeen years ago)

In the morning have a shower and a huge breakfast after shagging the Swedish twins you took home for the half-dozenth time

Mark C, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:23 (seventeen years ago)

yeah NV i'll be fine! tonight, however, i have to stay in and write an essay. gah, maybe i'll re-evaluate come 10 pm.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:24 (seventeen years ago)

Oh that sucks - can you rush the essay? Develop a sudden stomach flu meaning you get an extension? (It's amazing I ever got a degree really.)

Anna, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:29 (seventeen years ago)

Louis, what Noodle said is pretty good advice. However, what were you thinking doing this when you had an essay to get done? She calls, she says, "yes, I love you, poppage will ensue, get in bed, I'm on my way over wearing nothing but a g-string and a smile" and you have to say "sorry, love, not tonight, got an essay to write"?!?!? TIMING, DUDE.

ailsa, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:31 (seventeen years ago)

if it had been a thing, the essay would have been delayed until tomorrow morning. now, however, i have the chance to make a half-decent job of it. like i say, depending on progress, i might head off somewhere a little later on.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:33 (seventeen years ago)

poppage will ensue

gabbneb, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:34 (seventeen years ago)

hey man bummer but at least you made your fuck-want known

max, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:34 (seventeen years ago)

^^^this

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:35 (seventeen years ago)

lj = a responsible upstanding bro who i would have all this drinks with

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:36 (seventeen years ago)

would suggest consoling pint but am writing an "essay" of world-historical import.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:37 (seventeen years ago)

HOOS, should either of us cross the big water there will doubtless be a means to an end.

NRQ, fair enough, your dissertation comes first, but considering we're in the same city a pint or two would probably be a good idea at some point.

and please, can we stop referring to ALL sex as 'poppage'. it only relates to the very first time! learn yr ILX vernacular, innit.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:39 (seventeen years ago)

...or else gain an intimate knowledge of what you've been up to.

ailsa, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:41 (seventeen years ago)

you've already popped this girl whom you wrote the love letter for?

ken c, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:42 (seventeen years ago)

my phone's locked in a trunk right now but i will make it happen eventch.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:44 (seventeen years ago)

lol

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:45 (seventeen years ago)

jeez, ken!

anyway, i prefer 'em a bit more experienced (based on an admittedly meagre sample of two).

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:45 (seventeen years ago)

^^^just lost all sympathy

Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:47 (seventeen years ago)

Nah, jokes

Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:47 (seventeen years ago)

I didn't have any sympathy in the first place

Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:48 (seventeen years ago)

:D

that actually got quite a laugh out of me, a pretty fine achievement given my mood!

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:50 (seventeen years ago)

hey man bummer but at least you made your fuck-want known

-- max, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:34

YES. i recently confessed to a long-standing crush on one of my best mates. luckily she said "oh well then, i'd better break up with my boyfriend and we'll just get married and live happily ever after, m'kay?" and gave me a very old-fashioned look that said "really, after all this time, what did you think i'd say?"

we're better friends than ever since then. still fancy her, mind...

CharlieNo4, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:53 (seventeen years ago)

smooth move, charlieno4.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:54 (seventeen years ago)

luckily she said "oh well then, i'd better break up with my boyfriend and we'll just get married and live happily ever after, m'kay?" and gave me a very old-fashioned look that said "really, after all this time, what did you think i'd say?"

this is not a fun thing to have said to you.

sorry homes. empathies.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:54 (seventeen years ago)

Don't forgot to get pissed and phone her at 3 in the morning. Women love that.

Noodle Vague, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:58 (seventeen years ago)

Most behaviours you see in romantic comedies are perfect normally ways to ensnare women. Try some.

Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:00 (seventeen years ago)

classic you're 14, pathetic if you're an adult

dally, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:15 (seventeen years ago)

die

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:16 (seventeen years ago)

You wanna know the real moral of this story? Don't act on things you dream about. Sure, the reverie (on Thursday evening) unlocked a suppressed passion, and sure I was right to at least ascertain where I stood, but in the cold light of day, anything happening between us would be pretty goddamn far-fetched. She's two years older than me, vastly more experienced in matters of love, extremely good-looking, and nigh-on unattainable. Mentioning the dream (I hasten to add, a fully chaste affair) in the letter may or may not have been an error.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:24 (seventeen years ago)

i don't think you can expect a full-on positive response from a letter. you have to be in the room.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:26 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, that's kinda what I've realised. can't pull any captain wentworth shit unless the feeling's clearly mutual. should have played it cooler and asked her for a drink. curse this impetuous passion of mine.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:28 (seventeen years ago)

Don't act on things you dream about

DUDE. this is so wrong.

grimly fiendish, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:34 (seventeen years ago)

it sounds like you just came on too strong. once the girl can sense your desperation, you're done for.

bell_labs, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:39 (seventeen years ago)

i want to say that works both ways.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:40 (seventeen years ago)

DUDE. this is so wrong.

i know it is. i'm trying to convince myself that i made a mistake when i didn't. if you dream about asking a girl out, and the wish is fulfilled, it's pretty goddamn clear your subconscious is telling you something.

and hey, this is now a challenge, to act as maturely, as unflappably, and as genuinely around her as i can. who knows what might change.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:43 (seventeen years ago)

(not that I can try anything. that would be a stupid, stupid error. i'm actually srsly considering hitting the town tonight, just to draw a line under the whole weekend.)

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:44 (seventeen years ago)

Wait, while there's an argument to be made for not chasing your dreams, your story here doesn't seem to give any evidence towards it. You got rejected, sure, but that's... like, that's just not so bad. I've certainly had worse happen to me when I've been in your situation.

Casuistry, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:51 (seventeen years ago)

yes. go out. get pissed. DRAW THE LINE.

grimly fiendish, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:57 (seventeen years ago)

better to get it out dude. worst case you can at least move on. limbo's no place for a bro to be.

s1ocki, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:05 (seventeen years ago)

1. say it in person
2. play it cool, no 'i dream about u night and day'
3. realize that there is a chance u will be rejected and be ready to accept it

deej, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:07 (seventeen years ago)

'be ready to accept it' easier said than done but other fish etc.
a lot of times awkward, one-sided crushes tend to be irrational putting a person on a pedestal type shit. She is not 'nigh unnattainable,' shes a person you're putting a lot of value on and its probably partly justified but also ... shes human. chill

deej, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:09 (seventeen years ago)

yeh, you should try imagining her naked on the bog ... er, forget it.

grimly fiendish, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:10 (seventeen years ago)

sux2bu

and what, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:10 (seventeen years ago)

1. I failed to do.
2. The letter was a bit cooler than that, but not much.
3. I did realise, but I didn't really prepare.

you forgot 4. less handwringing. :D

xposts: no you didn't! :D :D

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:11 (seventeen years ago)

Don't dream about things you plan to act about.

Alba, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:11 (seventeen years ago)

next time a pretty girl i know IRL appears in the sylvan mists of surrealism and brutal psychology that is a dream of mine, i shall attempt to put grimly's advice into effect.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:13 (seventeen years ago)

how the fuck is it only 2:45 in the afternoon here

El Tomboto, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:43 (seventeen years ago)

LJ out. jol to get poppage.

aim uglier next time, it works eventually.

darraghmac, Monday, 22 October 2007 20:23 (seventeen years ago)

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41ZKX8WDEGL._SS500_.jpg

Louis you should totally buy this book, it's both an awesome piece of literature written by a one of the most empathetic authors living and a fantastic piece of advice that will pay off immediately.

Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 21:43 (seventeen years ago)

oh man the goldmine of classic posts to be uncovered in lj's application of 'the game'

deej, Monday, 22 October 2007 21:45 (seventeen years ago)

that book has already provoked one insanely long thread, but fuck it, why not two.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 21:56 (seventeen years ago)

I already know about 'The Game'. Who do you think I am, some pig-ignorant shut-in who has no idea about current cultural trends? (Don't answer that one.)

Such books, especially those teaching the secrets of salesmanship, are totally and utterly soulless, and I refuse to touch them with a bargepole.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:20 (seventeen years ago)

but pretty girls are soulless, dude. you're gonna end up popping mingers

ken c, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:23 (seventeen years ago)

Louis I, and i imagine at least twenty other ILXors, will paypal you £10 if you spend one month applying all of Strauss's techniques to the women on your course.

Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:26 (seventeen years ago)

Day 1: Buy gold watch
Day 5: Employ permanent wingman, who must be short and ugly but quite funny
Day 8: Nose job
Day 13: Start turning nice girls down; who wants them?
Day 24: Rohypnol

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:33 (seventeen years ago)

you should have written in the letter that you wanted to kiss her "sweet wet cunt"

elan, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:54 (seventeen years ago)

seemed to work for robbie

elan, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:54 (seventeen years ago)

haha! the thought actually crossed my mind. but...nah.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:55 (seventeen years ago)

it has to be a parapraxis, see. can't be sending those off on purpose.

Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:55 (seventeen years ago)

that only matters to lit critics, not girls you want to bone

elan, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:56 (seventeen years ago)

but it's time to move on. are there any cousins visiting?

elan, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:58 (seventeen years ago)

sorry it didn't work out, louis. but there will be other girls.
i am not sure these first move letters ever work for anyone. i can't think of a single instance when they have helped. girls read them aloud to each other and either die from laughter or say sadly, 'he's really nice but....'
don't ever send one again. i say this as friend, not foe.

estela, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:58 (seventeen years ago)

oh man the goldmine of classic posts to be uncovered in lj's application of 'the game'

-- deej, Monday, October 22, 2007 5:45 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link

oh man

and what, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:59 (seventeen years ago)

also estela is right, basically you have to make friends w/ girls & let them think they're seducing you

and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:00 (seventeen years ago)

well ok, she's not a poncy literature student who'd take the outburst as a pure expression of passionate lust rather than a vulgar turn-off.

xpost

cousins? nah. plenty more gravel in the driveway.

xpost

cheers estela! i honestly think my letter wasn't that laughable, but 'tis true i could (yet again) have come across as 'sweet' rather than sexy. 'sweet' is generally code for 'not in a million years'. no, i will not send one again. tete-a-tete from now on.

Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:01 (seventeen years ago)

ethan, i've played the ultra-long game before, but the downside is, i'm really bad at knowing when to make a decisive move.

Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:03 (seventeen years ago)

(getting there, though! my main problem is the continual obsession with finding the right girl. today's incident isn't one i'll regret, because i've at least shown myself not to be compromising. PLUS, i know to avoid sending love-letters.)

Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:07 (seventeen years ago)

its not the ultra-long game, im just saying spend a couple nights playing board games or some shit before you bust out the sonnets

and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:08 (seventeen years ago)

ya second-move letters work wonders

deeznuts, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:09 (seventeen years ago)

also estela is right, basically you have to make friends w/ girls & let them think they're seducing you

-- and what, Tuesday, October 23, 2007 12:00 AM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

so very very OTM. I don't think I've made the first move in literally years, and believe me, it's better for everybody involved. do be prepared to go for long periods without sex tho.

will, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:10 (seventeen years ago)

if you spend like two weeks drinking & chilling out every couple days & she still doesnt want the dick shes never gonna

and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:10 (seventeen years ago)

so you either move on or stay 'just friends' either way you dont end up looking like some poncey tard w/ a lonely hard-on

and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:11 (seventeen years ago)

have you stopped to think that if you find the right girl now you'll miss out on all the wrong girls.

estela, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:12 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, ethan is right to a degree, but i do think (in this culture at least) it's generally best to at least ask the girl to dinner. this i've done successfully a few times. it's the next bit that i find tricky. maybe board games really are the answer; been getting back into chess recently...

so you either move on or stay 'just friends' either way you dont end up looking like some poncey tard w/ a lonely hard-on

again, this has been the case in previous times. i'm prepared to be far more proactive and decisive nowadays, hence why i acted on this one. didn't act in the right way, but you live and learn.

have you stopped to think that if you find the right girl now you'll miss out on all the wrong girls.

formal dinner with a ladies' drinking society this thursday, i'm prepared for all sorts of wrong. :D

Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:15 (seventeen years ago)

(in this culture at least)

http://www.ozebook.com/copeland.jpg

and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:17 (seventeen years ago)

one offer's one's horse to the lady, and one walks tenderly beside, picking dandelions and braiding them into a wreath for her hair.

Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:19 (seventeen years ago)

have you stopped to think that if you find the right girl now you'll miss out on all the wrong girls.

-- estela, Monday, October 22, 2007 7:12 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

ha this is great

deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:22 (seventeen years ago)

also estela is right, basically you have to make friends w/ girls & let them think they're seducing you

-- and what, Monday, October 22, 2007 7:00 PM (22 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

this is so tru
they pretend u are supposed to make the first move, but youre supposed to make the first move the way they expect you to make the first move

deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:23 (seventeen years ago)

xpost: dorothy parker-esque wisdom be droppin'

Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:23 (seventeen years ago)

crushes mean very little in the grand scheme of things people get over it (them)

youn, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:25 (seventeen years ago)

I want a determining condition a classifying restraint in my life.

youn, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:25 (seventeen years ago)

my dumbass kind of fucked up a crush situation recently that i had the upper hand on initially, she was into me but ... i showed my cards a little too soon. but it happens, roll w/ the punches etc

deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:32 (seventeen years ago)

i think the letter was a mistake

omar little, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:36 (seventeen years ago)

tbh i'm feeling pretty much over this one already, so it was a damn good thing i did something about it, regardless of whether the medium was an error (which it was).

Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:39 (seventeen years ago)

i think letters work in fanciful theory and rarely if ever in actuality.

omar little, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:41 (seventeen years ago)

who writes a letter? send a text

deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:02 (seventeen years ago)

much better to sharpie a dick on her forehead whilst she slumbers

elan, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:03 (seventeen years ago)


my dumbass kind of fucked up a crush situation recently that i had the upper hand on initially, she was into me but ... i showed my cards a little too soon. but it happens, roll w/ the punches etc

you gotta know when to hold 'em and when to fold 'em bro.

ken c, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:04 (seventeen years ago)

xpost or "<your name> woz ere" on her ass amirite

ken c, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:06 (seventeen years ago)

true dat, gotta be discreet

elan, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:07 (seventeen years ago)

like they say, discretion is the better part of modassty

elan, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:09 (seventeen years ago)

Ah Louis, I went out and got hammered for you last night. Didn't pull, like.

Noodle Vague, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 11:32 (seventeen years ago)

girls read them aloud to each other and either die from laughter or say sadly, 'he's really nice but....'

or -- and i wish i could find a link to the story, 'cos this happened to some poor fucker a couple of years ago and was all over the UK news for a day or so, but i don't have time -- pass them on by e-mail until suddenly half the world's getting "heh, look what this dude sent to some lass he met at a party!" dropping into their inbox.

so yeh, good work on not e-mailing, louis! just in case ...

grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 14:06 (seventeen years ago)

never put anything in writing, that's just some 'advice' from a 'concerned associate'.

kapeesh?

darraghmac, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 14:25 (seventeen years ago)

follow max r's advice: one phone for bros, one for hos.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 14:27 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.