― Fugs, Monday, 6 October 2003 21:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)
Classic because it's quite an interesting, safe state to revel in.
Dud because they'll probably say no if you ever ask them because after all that time you'll make a pig's ear of it and also dud because it indicates that you are a thinker and a dreamer and not a doer and as a result your youth will always be a bit crappy and you'll end up looking back and think 'hmm - that was a bit rubbish'.
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 6 October 2003 21:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vic (Vic), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:36 (twenty-one years ago)
Hah! My life in a nutshell!
Person one: five years, at a stupid age, longing. Eventual answer = "No" (as delivered to proxy asker-outer; "He's a pervert"; what is a pervert age 15?)
Person two: two years longing. Eventual answer = "No" (different proxy asker; no reason given)
Person three: two years longing. Eventual answer = "No" ("Not even if you hadn't been so drunk")
Person four: two years longing. Eventual answer = there wasn't one, I didn't bother to ask. She was twenty years older than me, and married. But I still think I would have had a good chance.
Person five: three years wanting. Initial answer = "No". But there was cause to believe it wasn't as simple as that. Two more years longing. Final answer = she disappeared.
So, classic. I have not given up on any of these.
― Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Fugs, Monday, 6 October 2003 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Monday, 6 October 2003 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 6 October 2003 22:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Monday, 6 October 2003 22:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nicolars (Nicole), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)
Remember the Darwin Cheer:
Sperm and egg! Sperm and egg!Ram 'em! Cram 'em! Let 'em mate!
― Aimless, Monday, 6 October 2003 22:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:50 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.unitedmedia.com/comics/peanuts/meet_the_gang/images/meet_charlie_brown_big.gif
― Kingfish (Kingfish), Monday, 6 October 2003 22:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 6 October 2003 23:15 (twenty-one years ago)
Well obv. this is a tremendously good sign. Thank your lucky stars you don't instead start falling in love with her paininthearseness.
ok, seriously, how do you STOP having a crush on someone if you'd just prefer to move on?
Hypnotherapy?
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 6 October 2003 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)
how do you stop having a crush on a person you emphatically DO NOT want to have a crush on?
― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 6 October 2003 23:31 (twenty-one years ago)
Fuck you guys.
― ModJ, Monday, 6 October 2003 23:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kingfish (Kingfish), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nellie (nellskies), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:24 (twenty-one years ago)
No guarantees about the direction in which this humanization occurs, but no matter how it occurs, you won't have a crush any more. Either you'll develop a realistic relationship, or you'll suffer revulsion. Hurrah! No more crush.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:35 (twenty-one years ago)
Five years. And dud X 10. Especially dud if one drunkenly confesses said crush and the object of affection decides that they do not want to be one's friend anymore.
Sadly, humanizing is only possible when the person in question is not screening your calls.
― mouse, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 00:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 01:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 06:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave M. (rotten03), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 06:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Fabrice (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:01 (twenty-one years ago)
Unless, like, you enjoy the angst of it all. Which I generally do. And you know what? The crushes that went on the longest were actually the ones that *were* returned. And, sort of five years later, the bloke in question would say something like "Dammit, I thought you were hot, why'd you never say anything?" or, erm, "You were hot but I thought you were a psycho or something. You just had a CRUSH on me?"
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:11 (twenty-one years ago)
Jason Pierce to thread!
Oh, and it's gotta be both; really it's a question like 'breathing - c/d' or 'drinking water - c/d'. Isn't it?
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:28 (twenty-one years ago)
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:35 (twenty-one years ago)
I am just playing, BTW!
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:39 (twenty-one years ago)
Ah! Yes. When I was a lurker I think I saw something along those lines; but if you were presumably you'd be having money burnt on you, not ILXing.
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 07:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 08:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 08:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 08:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:24 (twenty-one years ago)
Because really. Unrequited crushes? Don't actually hurt anyone (except the crusher) and honestly. Sounds like YOU need to "get over it" because some people - believe it or not - actually get something out of the experience.
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:28 (twenty-one years ago)
I've had one more crush since then but the girl in q had a boyf already.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:29 (twenty-one years ago)
Julio, you should never assume that! Maybe either was waiting for you to ask her...
― Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:38 (twenty-one years ago)
its the kind of thinking that haunts me vic but its too late now.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:54 (twenty-one years ago)
It's been a while. I need a new one. I'm just sick of having crushes on musicians because I'm so disillusioned with music.
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:58 (twenty-one years ago)
So as N said way above: both
― Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― friedrich s (mark s), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:34 (twenty-one years ago)
Tom, that's just shot my entire perception. It's really strange how someone gives you a piece of advice, you think about it, go "hmm, that's quite good" and you follow it, and have these interesting experiences and they're good. And then the person that you thought gave you that advice comes along and says THAT'S NOT WHAT I MEANT AT ALL!!!
I'm so disappointed.
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:39 (twenty-one years ago)
I can laugh about it now but at the time it was terrible...
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― kathryn m (kathryn m), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:44 (twenty-one years ago)
Enrique I think that the pleasures are wrong and unhealthy in much the same way as any recovering addict thinks of their particular pleasures, i.e. I would never suggest I was 'above all that', I've just been 'clean' for a while now and I'm loving it. I did spend most of my youth doing it and as N. said right at the top of the thread all it meant was that I had a bit of a crummy youth.
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― piscesboy, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:49 (twenty-one years ago)
Maybe the good experiences were indirectly the results of the crushes... or the results of my trying to make my crush known without actually having to come out and say it (writing popsongs, making art, etc.). I don't think my youth was shite because of my crushing - if anything, if I ever *had* got the attentions of the object of my affections, my life wouldn't have been half so interesting and diverse as it has been. I could have ended up a suburban housewife or something! Blessing in disguise!
The thing you have to let go of is the idea that a crush has to be REQUITED in order to be good or useful or whatever. Not the crushing impulse itself.
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:51 (twenty-one years ago)
how about, "becoming more like a distant emperor, bored of his toy"?
― charltonlido (gareth), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 10:58 (twenty-one years ago)
This is the most fucked up thing ever posted to ILX.
― ModJ, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― ModJ, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:29 (twenty-one years ago)
(ha ha X-POST HILARITY!)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)
My friend the other day suggested putting "a moratorium on [her] crush". I think this is a good idea.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:31 (twenty-one years ago)
This is bullshit because it's making the assumption that all unrequited crushes never go beyond the level of longing from afar and twee romantic comedy lusting. You just have to search on ILE to see really creepy examples of this not being the case.
This is not directed at anyone in particular lest anyone get paranoid again, though I know that is a Kate quote I'm replying to.
― amazing jetpack? (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)
But you can't admit this to yourself or allow it to fester or become true.
I think the same is true of people who are single and constantly whine about it, if you make being single a public issue and whinge endlessly about it then you become a single person. It fulfills itself.
I don't claim to be an expert on relationships but I am fairly certain that all the above is good advice and that the old cliche of be yourself or more pertinently stay yourself, is a good one if you really want to be happy. Really happy I mean. It is about focussing on the positive.
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:41 (twenty-one years ago)
Not all people who drink alcohol become alcoholics. Not all people who have unrequited crushes turn stalker. Generalisation is dangerous.
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:50 (twenty-one years ago)
I think I've just complicated my point, but you know...not a stalker, okay? honest.
― kathryn m (kathryn m), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 12:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― NA (Nick A.), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:01 (twenty-one years ago)
So basically, Kate, what you are saying here is that there is absolutely no middle ground between harmless behavior and full on stalking? Black and white viewpoints are far more dangerous than so-called generalizations...
I'm not naming names, but rest assured the specific examples I'm thinking of are NOT stalkers. They are, however, creepy, obnoxious, and upsetting when they crop up in my life. They are in no way threatening me or showing up at my doorstep or following me around (well in most cases) but it still impacts me in a negative way nonetheless.
basically bnw OTM upthread, unsurprisingly. I've never had a long-term unrequited crush so I don't know how "rewarding" that is.
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)
The funny thing is, a lot of crushees who claim that the attention is negative - still somehow manage to encourage the crush. Maybe it's because they feel they want to be "nice" and not hurt the crusher, maybe it's because secretly they ARE getting something out of the arrangement, in the form of an ego boost.
I'm not confusing that with *geniune* stalking - where the stalker is genuinely disturbed and interprets encouragement where there is none.
But my experience of crushees is that if they are aware of the crush and do nothing to stop it, often it is because they are complicit. If you don't make it clear that the attention is unwanted, then to a certain extent, you warrant the attention that you get.
Yeah, I know I'm treading dangerously close to Camille Paglia ground here, but really.
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:09 (twenty-one years ago)
Funny thing is, 80% of crushes of the sort we are describing, the crushee is probably oblivious to the fact that there is a serious crush. So no, there really is no harm.
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:15 (twenty-one years ago)
If someone is paying you unwanted attention and you ask them to stop, and they continue, there is no "oh, they're NOT stalking but crushes are still bad" - legally they are harrassing you. It's gone beyond a crush.
There is a large grey area. Some people have more imagination, there are mixed messages, etc. etc. etc. I never said there was a hard and fast line between unrequited crushing and stalking, but they are NOT the same thing.
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)
And please, Ally, I'm not trying to discount or dismiss your experiences. I've been on the receiving end of stalking, and I've also been on the giving end of crushes that went too far - I know how scary and how powerful both experiences can be.
But I interpreted your post to say that all unrequited crushes are potential stalker situations, and that's just ridiculous.
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)
But if it's serious then it's rubbish (but not so rubbish that you want to stop).
Especially if you've liked someone for over a year and then you just give up on it and start going out with someone else, but within the safety of another relationship you decide you're going to tell your former crush and it turns out that he's disappointed and fancied you all that time. And even though you've both finally admitted you like each other. Still nothing happens.
Some people you make moves on. Some people make moves on you. But there are some times when you ought to and they ought to but neither does and you both keep floating on in this weird little nether world and that's all there is. And sometimes it turns into a very nice friendship that you probably couldn't have with anyone else, if you hadn't both fancied each other once and never done anything about it.
― nickie (nickie), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:30 (twenty-one years ago)
There are a lot of people who fear confrontation. I don't think the failure to confront someone or tell them to stop should always equal being consciously or subconsciously complicit in the crush.
― Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 13:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:08 (twenty-one years ago)
Nicole OTM.
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:14 (twenty-one years ago)
Change 'discussion' to 'janitor' and you have an episode of Hong Kong Phooey.
― N. (nickdastoor), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vic (Vic), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:18 (twenty-one years ago)
(j/k, honestly)
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)
Who's there?
Interrupting Sheep.
Interrupting Sheep Wh-BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Richey Manic (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Julian Casablancas (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)
(also I have an amazing jetpack, fuck off everyone)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Julian Casablancas (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jimmy Fallon (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 14:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)
Well have you ever had to get up early in the morning? Have you ever had to do the gross dishes? Have you ever had to clean a toilet? How about get a job, or make a doctor's appointment, or get a haircut? Some of these things might seem easy and some of them might be the kinds of things you avoid at all costs. But eventually you do them because eventually you realize that you HAVE TO. And once you realize that, somehow it gets done!!! It's like sorcery!!!
Getting over a crush is just like that. You go 'I have to get over this person, this is making me behave like a ridiculous chimpanzee' and then you go and discipline your mind to stop thinking of the crushee as the best thing that could ever possibly happen to you in your entire life and go about the business of living.
I wouldn't be nearly as terse about all this if I hadn't spent such a great deal of my youth as well acting the fool for some girl I had no chance with. It's absurd behavior and I still don't buy a word of Kate's arguments that it does any good, if you need to always be thinking about some random infatuation to improve yourself or be creative then there are other issues at hand which fortunately don't belong in this discussion.
1. It's not easy(a.)
a. I never said it was anyway.
― TOMBOT, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:03 (twenty-one years ago)
Don't tell me what's right for me, and I won't tell you what's right for robots.
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)
-- N. (nickdastoo...), October 7th, 2003. (later)
Only the other day? It's more like "the other minute" with me.
And having just spoken to my own personal heroin, I'm changing my vote to dud dud dud dud dud. Absolute drain on time, effort, and emotion, leaving the crusher pretty much dead to the world and unable to operate functionally with other human beings.
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sean (Sean), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― charltonlido (gareth), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:43 (twenty-one years ago)
Anyway:
Hearing far more than is there in a piece of music because of wacked-up emotional life - c/d
For anutha day, perhaps.
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)
be one of those people, maybe people will have crushes on you then. in fact, maybe your own crush will stop seeing you as an irritant, trying to get a piece of their life, and start seeing you as a cool person with an exciting life of their own, they might even want a piece of that
lead a life that others want to be a part of.
― charltonlido (gareth), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― charltonlido (gareth), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)
Thats it!!! I'm going to become a real-lfe bon-fide pirate!
― jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:12 (twenty-one years ago)
Sure, but if the FAT thinks that he can tell me that I am empowered to do the same, he's talking out of his shiny metal ass.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)
Andrew, for a minute there you had me thinking you had read the Mo'Nique book.
― Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 16:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― half jack, Tuesday, 7 October 2003 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 19:47 (twenty-one years ago)
Oh look I'm sorry, I really didn't feel teased for what it's worth since I didn't actually think this was really an argument or you were really bothered. I'm surprised you mind but I suspect and hope you don't really mind too much. I just criticised what the thread had become in that it was boiling into argument but now it has even moreso.
I really don't know what else to say, I could argue more but I don't want to really cos normally we get along and it seems fairly trivial now.
I think this thread is quite a sensitive subject with people and not the easiest thing to discuss. That's why I felt it had gone wrong. I don't speak for N or have no idea what he thinks or why he thinks what he posted, just for the record.
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― isadora (isadora), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 20:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 21:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 21:07 (twenty-one years ago)
"Worth crossing the street to avoid", while sprinting across
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 22:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 7 October 2003 23:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― lolita corpus (lolitacorpus), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 01:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nellie (nellskies), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 01:51 (twenty-one years ago)
As for getting over it - just stop torturing yourself by interacting with the other person as often (or at all, if outside of crush-status, they aren't your friend). Sooner or later, the crush will fade.
More distance = more objectivity, so it's easier to see his or her flaws, too.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 02:54 (twenty-one years ago)
Sexual display is all, sexual display is everything.
You get over the crush when you no longer need whatever it is that the crush is representing (that you feel you are missing in your life).
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:17 (twenty-one years ago)
Are you kidding? That wd *rool*. That's the whole point of crushing! It never happens, though, obv. Or does it? Maybe, just maybe... No: a heads-up is in order: it's *never the case*. Unless, who knows...?
― Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)
Like I said, I've had at least two situations in my life where I had a crush on a person, did nothing cause I was too shy, and found out ages later that the crush was returned. So maybe that's why I'm a little bit more forward about finding out now.
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― youn, Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:34 (twenty-one years ago)
(Whore!)
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:36 (twenty-one years ago)
The idea of love at first sight is one of the most damaging myths ever to install unrealistic expectations in people's romantic relationships.
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:38 (twenty-one years ago)
so i can't see that i'm doing any worse than people who go through boyfriends like tissue (one this year, one the next etc)
― Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:45 (twenty-one years ago)
It bears thinking about how one measures a "successful" relationship.
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:47 (twenty-one years ago)
Please provide an example of where I have gone on at length about how they were not happy. I have not done so. You are being presumptuous.
― Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:50 (twenty-one years ago)
You're right, I don't know you well. I'm just going by the attitude that (I infer) you project on this board.
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 07:59 (twenty-one years ago)
Everything you write on ILE is filtered through your own lense, as shown by the advice you are giving to the person on this thread, AS YOU YOURSELF ADMIT, (as with your "been there, done that" part of your post) so why are you having a go at me for reading and responding to ILE through my own filter?
Hypocrite.
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:01 (twenty-one years ago)
Whoa! Oh boy, who's making assumptions now, Chelsea? My impression of you is formed more by YOUR OWN BEHAVIOUR on this board than any pre-existing knowledge about your previous relationships.
You are a total fucking hypocrite.
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:04 (twenty-one years ago)
I have had many people privately email me expressing the exact sentiment that everything I post is somehow related to Chris. I am glad if no one is dwelling on it, but some evidently are. As I said, those who are dwelling on it should get over it. Those who aren't are much appreciated.
― Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pablo Cruise (chaki), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:14 (twenty-one years ago)
The ironic thing is, when I met you I actually liked you a lot, we had a great time and I came away with a very positive impression of you. Online, I get a quite different impression.
Fair enough, the internet does strange thing to people's personalities and the perception thereof. There are a number of people on ILX that I get along fine with IRL, yet have a bad reaction to on ILX, and vice versa.
You assume that I am responding negatively towards you because I've got a "Chris Filter" when the truth is, I am responding negatively towards your posts and your posting style. I don't presume to tell other people how they should or shouldn't post on ILE (beyond simple nettiquette) and I know that there are a number of people who object to my posts, and *my* posting style.
You rant on that people who are "dwelling on it should get over it" but you know what? Perhaps you need to get over the giant "Chris Chip One Your Shoulder" and stop making assumptions about us.
I don't want to debate about this, and I don't want to fight about it. We are different people, we have had different experiences and we have different approaches towards relationships. That's why there's chocolate AND vanilla.
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:19 (twenty-one years ago)
I agree about chocolate and vanilla.
― Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Orbit (Orbit), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pablo Cruise (chaki), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pablo Cruise (chaki), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 08:31 (twenty-one years ago)
ANYWAY I have had crushes but they they are never ever long term crushing situations cos I forget about them if I don't end up dating the person. Also 80% of them have been on, for example, Batman or the leader dude from Voltron so I guess that isn't really the same thing as what this thread is talking about.
― Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 12:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 12:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 12:54 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.dpo.uab.edu/~marcus/cels/voltron/voltron-keith2.jpg
― Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nicolars (Nicole), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― bnw (bnw), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― bnw (bnw), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― bnw (bnw), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 13:59 (twenty-one years ago)
Thing is, and I don't know quite how I'm going to break this to myself...but...she's...fictional!
I don't want the actress, I want Amelie. The things she does and the way she thinks.
Oh, my love will never be requited!
― mei (mei), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 19:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nicolars (Nicole), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 19:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 19:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― TOMBOT, Wednesday, 8 October 2003 19:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sarah (starry), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 20:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 8 October 2003 20:10 (twenty-one years ago)
If a crush is intolerable (I find ones with famous people and people you don't have to deal with kinda nice. A reminder there are people out there you still dig plus you can have many at the same time), either let 'em know and/or get cooler about your life without them. Most of the time I spent pining away for somebody was in part because I didn't like the way things were for me. That said, I will marry Kelly Osbourne and our children will be named Maverick and Anastasia. Peace out.
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 9 October 2003 01:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 9 October 2003 01:43 (twenty-one years ago)
Let me tell you how my mind works in re: one of my "silly celeb crushes" (in this case, I'll be describing the one I have on Nick Rhodes):
Well, I think Nick Rhodes is gorgeous, right? And if I were to actually befriend him* and then he were to express any interest in me**, I'd definitely go for him. But at the same time, I can be a third-party viewer of his relationships and root for him to find a decent, lovely girl (a la Madeleine Farley), feel a bit noncommittal about a female I'm not 100% sure about (a la Lady Victoria Hervey), and boo and hiss over a female who is clearly not worth his while (a la Tara Palmer Tompkinson). Plus, I can swoon and stare at photos of Nick without feeling that I *must* have that sort of feeling reciprocated. I'm generally realistic about my thoughts of how any interaction between him and me should be like.
*: The chances of this happening are slim to none, sure, but certainly larger than my chances of winning the lottery.
**: The chances of this happening are even slimmer and more nonexistent, but again, certainly larger than my chances of winning the lottery.
Now, I have had a real, true crush on someone else for awhile, btw, someone whom I've viewed as a friend, and have admitted it to him, but it's only been now that I've been able to figure out what to do with it. I figure that it's pointless to try to deny my feelings for him, but it's also pointless to expect anything to develop from it. Plus, he's involved with someone else at this point. So I figure I'll compartmentalize my feelings for this person -- I'll keep my friendly feelings toward him separate from my "crush" feelings, and I'll treat this crush like I would a "silly celeb crush", except with benefits because a friendship's already there (so yay for that!).
There. All out in black and white. Ta-daaaaa.
― Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Thursday, 9 October 2003 03:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Thursday, 9 October 2003 03:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― JuliaA (j_bdules), Thursday, 9 October 2003 03:56 (twenty-one years ago)
(If this thread has 244 serious responses has Fugs won or lost?)
― solo, Thursday, 9 October 2003 05:02 (twenty-one years ago)
I have had 'love at first sight' but must agree with Kate. It's crap. Real, lasting love takes a lot more work than that. It's not instantenous. (and if you think it is it's pretty much destined to let you down.)
― A Girl Named Sam (thatgirl), Thursday, 9 October 2003 05:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Thursday, 9 October 2003 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)
What, Amelie?
Sure she _looks_ cute, but of the way the film is narrated and yr told what she's thinking you get to know the unusual way she thinks.
The things she does bring magic into the world. She goes to so much trouble.
Hence corny indie fuckers having crushes on her, natch. TOMBOT
Oh no! I'm indie! Why didn't anyone tell me?
― mei (mei), Thursday, 9 October 2003 09:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:00 (twenty-one years ago)
Her pupils dilated (I guess mine did too) and she smiled in a _very_ interesting way. I thought she was gorgeous and I'm pretty sure she liked the look of me too.
We politeley exchanged money for goods, and smiles for smiles.In soft voices we cordially thanked each other and I left.
Made my day, week and month. Need to go back there soon.
*******************************************************It may not be love, but that's 'love at first sight' :-)
― mei (mei), Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:19 (twenty-one years ago)
Funnily enough, the only true "love at first sight" experience that I feel I had that was positive was the longest-term crush I've ever had, and the long-term crush that turned out to have been reciprocated. What would you call that? Mutual long-term unspoken crush at first sight?
(And does "at first sight" count if you've already been primed with a phone conversation first?)
― kate (kate), Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Thursday, 9 October 2003 10:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― oops (Oops), Thursday, 9 October 2003 18:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Friday, 10 October 2003 02:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Friday, 10 October 2003 02:27 (twenty-one years ago)
There is a point that you can build rejection into such a big, awful thing in your head that would really be a whole lot better for you if you got it over with.
But there's also a point where, if you've never experienced anything *but* rejection, you can give up even wanting to try. Because you've never got a reward.
― kate (kate), Friday, 10 October 2003 07:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Friday, 10 October 2003 07:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:42 (nineteen years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:44 (nineteen years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:48 (nineteen years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:48 (nineteen years ago)
You just seem to be reviving/posting on an awful lot of these threads, Cozen, and I wondered if something was up.
― Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:50 (nineteen years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 10:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:01 (nineteen years ago)
must be becuz "its never enough"
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:02 (nineteen years ago)
i had emotions for her because she was a good candidate/rough outline of the type of person i thought i desperately needed in my life -> my infatuations picked up from there and i subsconsciously extrapolated her into a hyper-idealized crush. conversely, because i had no grasp on my own agency in literally creating her, the crush felt so strong and so imposing that i feebly identified it as the beginnings of love.
actually, physically *being* with her forced me back into the reality of who she was (nothing bad, just nowhere near what i'd envisioned) and the crush burst like a bubble.
― cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:05 (nineteen years ago)
based on not doing any of these things.
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:07 (nineteen years ago)
Gone back and read the old answers and it sure is weird. I'm trying to remember what was going on in my life at the time, and I can't, really. What a long time ago.
I still think that crushes are more good than bad, courtly love and all that. Better when not acted upon.
― Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Mädchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:13 (nineteen years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:16 (nineteen years ago)
And Enrique, it is actually worth reading - there are some hillarious bits on this thread. (Some funny at the time, some funny with perspective.)
― Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:16 (nineteen years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:18 (nineteen years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:18 (nineteen years ago)
But you won't all fit in my bed! :-(
― Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:18 (nineteen years ago)
she crushes on them, then she shags them, or not, if they've any smarts.
― Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Sororah T Massacre (blueski), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 11:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:16 (nineteen years ago)
I blame the drugs.
― Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:19 (nineteen years ago)
Love Vigilantes was about the Fawlkands War, wasn't it?
In the end, you will submit, it's got to hurt you, a little bit.
― Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:19 (nineteen years ago)
And 1963 - what the HECK was going on in this song? Did someone get shot? I'm so confused by it.
― Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Come Back Johnny B (Johnney B), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:25 (nineteen years ago)
('thieves like us' [='they live by night'] and 'in a lonely place')
The difference between fancying someone and having a crush on them is interesting me at the moment. When does one morph into the other?
i spose it's about how much time u spend building up their character over long teenage sundays spent listening to example given 'pet sounds'.
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:27 (nineteen years ago)
JFK!
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Lee Harvey Oswald (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 12:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Kate Classic (kate), Tuesday, 20 December 2005 13:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan (Hypotheticals) Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:10 (nineteen years ago)
― [jailhouse tattoo] (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Wednesday, 21 December 2005 22:20 (nineteen years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 22 December 2005 11:03 (nineteen years ago)
I take that back
― cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 22 December 2005 11:04 (nineteen years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 22 December 2005 11:05 (nineteen years ago)
For “funny” (and for “unchristian”), read instantly effective, or atmosphere-charging, or ludicrous, or self-denying, or generally wrong-footing of such of the world as obtains in one’s immediate vicinity. When you have no opinion on an issue, it cannot be ‘wrong’ to invent one, simply to explore what happens when you make it known.
― cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 22 December 2005 11:06 (nineteen years ago)
yeah, i had this, and then one lasting about 5 years.
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Thursday, 22 December 2005 11:09 (nineteen years ago)
ok fuck i just wrote one amazing love-letter. leaving it in her pigeonhole tomorrow morning. may divulge contents at later date. jeez am i nervous.
― Just got offed, Saturday, 20 October 2007 02:39 (seventeen years ago)
i wanna c on d baby
― elan, Saturday, 20 October 2007 05:18 (seventeen years ago)
you probably should've just put it in her mailbox
― remy bean, Saturday, 20 October 2007 05:34 (seventeen years ago)
if you value your soul do not divulge anything here.
― gff, Saturday, 20 October 2007 06:12 (seventeen years ago)
have you learned nothing
Yep, they're right. Don't dare say anything here.
I've been grappling with this of late, but I've just decided it's best not to speak to the beloved in real terms. I will never tell them I love them. Ever. They are just going to have to figure it out.
― Bimble, Saturday, 20 October 2007 06:53 (seventeen years ago)
ok no divulging. but the deed is done. gonna need a bit more sleep to think on things.
― Just got offed, Saturday, 20 October 2007 07:57 (seventeen years ago)
can you post the letter in this thread? we can offer constructive criticism and encouragement : )
― omar little, Saturday, 20 October 2007 08:05 (seventeen years ago)
"leaving it in her pigeonhole"
Someone start a "fave names for vagina" poll.
― nathalie, Saturday, 20 October 2007 08:19 (seventeen years ago)
Oh baby don't it feel like heaven right now Don't it feel like something from a dream Yeah I've never known nothing quite like this Don't it feel like tonight might never be again We know better than to try and pretend Baby no one could'a ever told me about this I said yeah yeah
CHORUS The waiting is the hardest part Every day you see one more card You take it on faith, you take it to the heart The waiting is the hardest part
Well yeah I might have chased a couple women around All it ever got me was down Then there were those that made me feel good But never as good as I'm feeling right now Baby you're the only one that's ever known how To make me wanna live like I want to live now I said yeah yeah
CHORUS The waiting is the hardest part Every day you get one more yard You take it on faith, you take it to the heart The waiting is the hardest part
Oh don't let it kill you baby, don't let it get to you Don't let it kill you baby, don't let it get to you I'll be your bleeding heart, I'll be your crying fool Don't let this go too far Don't let it get to you
― Just got offed, Saturday, 20 October 2007 21:21 (seventeen years ago)
As long as you didn't end it with "PS I am wanking as I write this".
― Noodle Vague, Saturday, 20 October 2007 21:24 (seventeen years ago)
lool
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 20 October 2007 21:26 (seventeen years ago)
the wanking is the hardest part
― Just got offed, Saturday, 20 October 2007 21:28 (seventeen years ago)
Gawd, even reading the name of this thread makes my stomach crawl. If I could meet myself when I was 15 I would beat my own face to a pulp and perform roundhouse kicks to my younger spleen, with intermittent elbow drops thrown in for good measure. If you ever experience the other perspective, where someone obviously likes you but is too shy to say anything, it comes across as 30% cute and 70% pathetic.
― Z S, Saturday, 20 October 2007 23:06 (seventeen years ago)
. If you ever experience the other perspective, where someone obviously likes you but is too shy to say anything, it comes across as 30% cute and 70% pathetic.
I've heard that.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 20 October 2007 23:11 (seventeen years ago)
Bahahaa. Someone *needs* to do a cover of that song and change the lyrics around.
― Bimble, Saturday, 20 October 2007 23:28 (seventeen years ago)
holygeez there are like five million damn crush threads so i'm just going with this one wait love letters? pigeon holes?
maybe i should do parallel experiment and we could see who wins
haha noo but really what is awesome is that i have minor crush on someone i really don't even know and who is obv prob rong and yknow am too busy/uh for crushes/things anyway so i'm just going to keep listening to his wacked out radio show that's all! /sharing
― rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:05 (seventeen years ago)
u drunk?
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:20 (seventeen years ago)
no i am just like this today
― rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:22 (seventeen years ago)
well 1.5 beers
― rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:23 (seventeen years ago)
2
― rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:32 (seventeen years ago)
3
― elan, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:38 (seventeen years ago)
5
7
11
13
17
19
23
damn you are in prime crush territory
All hail rrrobyn!!!
― Bimble, Sunday, 21 October 2007 01:15 (seventeen years ago)
Dud, and even worse when you're watching it from the sidelines.
― Eric H., Sunday, 21 October 2007 01:17 (seventeen years ago)
I once asked Friend X if she was aware of this thing I had for Friend Y and she went "dude, it's kinda obvious. Everybody knows except her."
;_;
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 21 October 2007 01:27 (seventeen years ago)
24
― rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 01:38 (seventeen years ago)
going out maybe he will be there and we can have awkward conversation! lol
― rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 01:39 (seventeen years ago)
i don't have awkward conversation anyway forward leeward skyward
― rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 01:46 (seventeen years ago)
26
547
― rrrobyn, Sunday, 21 October 2007 05:46 (seventeen years ago)
otm
― elan, Sunday, 21 October 2007 07:19 (seventeen years ago)
I think love letters are like CVs -- any longer than two sides of paper and you're likely to put the recipient off.
― Alba, Sunday, 21 October 2007 09:41 (seventeen years ago)
it was just under one side, written with short sentences and direct prose. the way these things should be.
― Just got offed, Sunday, 21 October 2007 09:42 (seventeen years ago)
You and me baby we ain't nothing but mammals. So let's do it like they do on the Discovery Channel Yours, Louis
P.S. I am wanking as I write this.
― Alba, Sunday, 21 October 2007 11:17 (seventeen years ago)
I too think love letters are like CVs -- though getting references can be awkward.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 21 October 2007 11:39 (seventeen years ago)
I'm always saying there should be some system for obtaining references from past lovers!
― Alba, Sunday, 21 October 2007 11:53 (seventeen years ago)
BANG LOUIS JAGGER
Yours, Louis
― DJ Mencap, Sunday, 21 October 2007 12:05 (seventeen years ago)
looooool
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 21 October 2007 12:06 (seventeen years ago)
only thing worse: saying something
― Dr Morbius, Sunday, 21 October 2007 21:06 (seventeen years ago)
If you ever experience the other perspective, where someone obviously likes you but is too shy to say anything, it comes across as 30% cute and 70% pathetic.
Those numbers are only true if the feeling isn't mutual.
― Casuistry, Sunday, 21 October 2007 21:31 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, but come on - what are the chances of both people being pathetic?
― Alba, Sunday, 21 October 2007 21:32 (seventeen years ago)
in a matter of hours i shall know whether this is a thing. if it is, a twee-er and more overtly 'hullo sky, hullo clouds' LJ will grace these boards. we're talking nuvvieworld-levels here.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 00:12 (seventeen years ago)
if it isn't, the lol britpop zing crew have no idea what's hitting them.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 00:13 (seventeen years ago)
the important thing to note is that i've regarded this girl as well out of my league for over two years now.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 00:15 (seventeen years ago)
scourage!
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 22 October 2007 00:22 (seventeen years ago)
di^^^ment ain't what i need
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 00:27 (seventeen years ago)
good luck, hopefully she has a thing for zingoholics.
― estela, Monday, 22 October 2007 00:37 (seventeen years ago)
was supposed to be encouragement, homes. good luck. xpost
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 22 October 2007 00:58 (seventeen years ago)
hey dude I know! i was just making an over-elaborate muse. cheers bro!
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 01:15 (seventeen years ago)
I have a new bf as of last week, and the moment I said so to ppl, a dear friend of mine I had quite a crush on and had given up any hope of having a dalliance with admitted to me he wanted to go out with me.
Let this be a lesson to you, shy men of the world. Grrr grumble.
― Trayce, Monday, 22 October 2007 03:50 (seventeen years ago)
i had a huge crush on my best friend. i dropped not-so-subtle hints until he finally told me HE had a crush on me. in retrospect it's now obvious he felt the same way, but at the time i couldn't come right out with it because i was sure he was way out of my league. luckily, he is far braver than me.
ps. YAY FOR TRAYCE! so that's why your fb status is all about not getting enough sleep... ;)
― Rubyredd, Monday, 22 October 2007 04:18 (seventeen years ago)
she has the note. the die is cast. also, i have had a brief chat with one of her friends over the issue. the next six or so hours will be nerve-racking.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:19 (seventeen years ago)
White girls from rich families do tend to have something for black guys, so maybe start wearing blackface around campus?
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:24 (seventeen years ago)
I think my former roommate (girl) had a thing for me (dude) because we had a ton in common and she'd flirt with me pretty ridiculously. She has a daddy complex, so the minute I ask her out she'll probably disappear with some 34 year old dude. Sometimes crushes are best kept to yourslef when it comes to psycho chixxxx. Also, why do girls in their early-mid twenties onyl date older guys?
http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/60minutes/20061020/7f5e6cc75ec0e9b9cae9ad26968340bc.jpg
― burt_stanton, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:34 (seventeen years ago)
ok dom i can normally enjoy yr 'lol rich' shizzle, but she's from a lower-middle class background if that. wealthy girls are generally a turn-off for me. tend to be up themselves/spoiled/irritatingly precious/unlovable. this girl is genuine, down to earth, fun, everything the toffish ones often aren't. i know you have beef with my uni, and fair enough, but we're not all banker's children with trust funds and affiliations to exclusive 'clubs' which are actually an excuse to get semi-willing girls dressed unsexily in tiny sheafs of fabric really rat-arsed, take advantage of them and then buy them an expensive meal the next day to take their mind off the sordid union. not all. just some.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:35 (seventeen years ago)
guys who get crushes on girls they hardly know for years
=
not the sort of guys those girls would go out with anyway
HARSH
― max r, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:37 (seventeen years ago)
but she's from a lower-middle class background
rickjameslyrics_ghettolife.txt
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:44 (seventeen years ago)
dude i'm not saying she's from a deprived background, i'm just saying that your strawman is faintly ridiculous.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:47 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sprung
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:49 (seventeen years ago)
exclusive 'clubs' which are actually an excuse to get semi-willing girls dressed unsexily in tiny sheafs of fabric really rat-arsed, take advantage of them and then buy them an expensive meal the next day to take their mind off the sordid union. not all. just some.
-- Just got offed, Monday, October 22, 2007 2:35 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
wait what
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:51 (seventeen years ago)
He's talking about the debating society
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:52 (seventeen years ago)
hawks' club's really gone downhill /cantab zing
xpost
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:52 (seventeen years ago)
And Louis, I mean this sincerely, if you DO get on a date with this girl, just don't talk about music.
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:53 (seventeen years ago)
most 'clubs' are like that, enrique, notably the P1tt club. urgh.
sprung is a fair description.
haha, i've made THAT mistake before, dom! things about which i am an aspie (i.e. music, cricket, football) are DEFINITE no-gos.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:55 (seventeen years ago)
you have no chance, forget about her.
― max r, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:56 (seventeen years ago)
so anyway, moved to a flat in camden a couple of weeks ago, thought it would be better for my music career to be part of the "scene". my friend tarquin needed a new bassist for his band "the costellos" so, here i am. my dad sorted my out my the place, a rehearsal room, bought me some furniture and musical equipment: a fender jazz bass and a marshall amp, not to mention a strat so i can work on my songwriting.
problem is: dad's only hooking me up with £600 a week, after rent bills, etc.. not really enough to live the rock and roll lifestyle, keep up with the latest fashions and keep a girlfriend in tow, it's really unfair.
so could anyone sort us out with some gigs? you get well paid for them, right?
our drummer went to boarding school with a couple of guys from the horrors, so they might be able to help out, but the music biz is a tough game and any help at all would be appreciated.
-- max r, Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:16 AM (8 hours ago) Bookmark Link
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:57 (seventeen years ago)
you will have to think of some more imaginative ways of suggesting that i be banned than that, quitney.
-- max r, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:19 (38 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:58 (seventeen years ago)
OK now it's the worst thread ever.
-- Matt DC, Monday, 22 October 2007 10:26 (3 hours ago) Bookmark Link
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 13:59 (seventeen years ago)
That can't be real. Please tell me that's not real?
― Laurel, Monday, 22 October 2007 14:02 (seventeen years ago)
it's a game of 'guess who's trolling'.
would saw PEW but he seems to know england too well.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 14:04 (seventeen years ago)
i kid because i love
― max r, Monday, 22 October 2007 14:05 (seventeen years ago)
why do girls in their early-mid twenties onyl date older guys?
hint: think about guys who are younger than early-mid twenties
― ken c, Monday, 22 October 2007 14:10 (seventeen years ago)
I don't wanna. Girls on the other hand....
― Upt0eleven, Monday, 22 October 2007 14:49 (seventeen years ago)
wealthy girls are generally a turn-off for me. tend to be up themselves/spoiled/irritatingly precious/unlovable.
jesus. way to steareotype. unlovable? harsh
― sunny successor, Monday, 22 October 2007 15:38 (seventeen years ago)
i didn't say all of them!
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 15:40 (seventeen years ago)
who doesn't love money? hot + rich = even better.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 15:40 (seventeen years ago)
Given that these things tend to happen for me in weekends, then
-Charlton losing to Wolves -Worcestershire signing basket-case Simon Jones -England losing the RWC final
will be followed by a Hamilton cock-up tomorrow.
Just sayin'.
-- Just got offed, Saturday, 20 October 2007 21:03 (Yesterday) Bookmark Link
-- Just got offed, Sunday, 21 October 2007 17:43 (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
my love-letter will also fail to accrue a positive response. it's inevitable. :(
-- Just got offed, Sunday, 21 October 2007 17:53 (Yesterday) Bookmark Link
pretty comprehensively, not a thing.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:07 (seventeen years ago)
What was the response?
― Alba, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:10 (seventeen years ago)
her friend called me and said 'yeah she didn't seem very keen...and the bit about forgetting about it and moving on if it wasn't going to happen? do that.'
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:12 (seventeen years ago)
ow, fuck. sorry, dude.
― grimly fiendish, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:13 (seventeen years ago)
she'd do well to keep the letter, mind. when i'm famous... ;)
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:18 (seventeen years ago)
thats the spirit
― deej, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:19 (seventeen years ago)
that's the spirit!
FUCKING HELL, X-POST!
― grimly fiendish, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:20 (seventeen years ago)
Okay LJ. Go out tonight, get hammered, do regrettable shit. DON'T POST ABOUT IT HERE.* In the morning have a shower and a huge breakfast and remind yourself that there's a world of stuff out there still waiting to happen to you, and that in x years time you won't even remember what this shit was about. Line: drawn.
*okay go on then if you want.
― Noodle Vague, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:20 (seventeen years ago)
In the morning have a shower and a huge breakfast after shagging the Swedish twins you took home for the half-dozenth time
― Mark C, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:23 (seventeen years ago)
yeah NV i'll be fine! tonight, however, i have to stay in and write an essay. gah, maybe i'll re-evaluate come 10 pm.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:24 (seventeen years ago)
Oh that sucks - can you rush the essay? Develop a sudden stomach flu meaning you get an extension? (It's amazing I ever got a degree really.)
― Anna, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:29 (seventeen years ago)
Louis, what Noodle said is pretty good advice. However, what were you thinking doing this when you had an essay to get done? She calls, she says, "yes, I love you, poppage will ensue, get in bed, I'm on my way over wearing nothing but a g-string and a smile" and you have to say "sorry, love, not tonight, got an essay to write"?!?!? TIMING, DUDE.
― ailsa, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:31 (seventeen years ago)
if it had been a thing, the essay would have been delayed until tomorrow morning. now, however, i have the chance to make a half-decent job of it. like i say, depending on progress, i might head off somewhere a little later on.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:33 (seventeen years ago)
poppage will ensue
― gabbneb, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:34 (seventeen years ago)
hey man bummer but at least you made your fuck-want known
― max, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:34 (seventeen years ago)
^^^this
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:35 (seventeen years ago)
lj = a responsible upstanding bro who i would have all this drinks with
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:36 (seventeen years ago)
would suggest consoling pint but am writing an "essay" of world-historical import.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:37 (seventeen years ago)
HOOS, should either of us cross the big water there will doubtless be a means to an end.
NRQ, fair enough, your dissertation comes first, but considering we're in the same city a pint or two would probably be a good idea at some point.
and please, can we stop referring to ALL sex as 'poppage'. it only relates to the very first time! learn yr ILX vernacular, innit.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:39 (seventeen years ago)
...or else gain an intimate knowledge of what you've been up to.
― ailsa, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:41 (seventeen years ago)
you've already popped this girl whom you wrote the love letter for?
― ken c, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:42 (seventeen years ago)
my phone's locked in a trunk right now but i will make it happen eventch.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:44 (seventeen years ago)
lol
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:45 (seventeen years ago)
jeez, ken!
anyway, i prefer 'em a bit more experienced (based on an admittedly meagre sample of two).
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:45 (seventeen years ago)
^^^just lost all sympathy
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:47 (seventeen years ago)
Nah, jokes
I didn't have any sympathy in the first place
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:48 (seventeen years ago)
:D
that actually got quite a laugh out of me, a pretty fine achievement given my mood!
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:50 (seventeen years ago)
-- max, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:34
YES. i recently confessed to a long-standing crush on one of my best mates. luckily she said "oh well then, i'd better break up with my boyfriend and we'll just get married and live happily ever after, m'kay?" and gave me a very old-fashioned look that said "really, after all this time, what did you think i'd say?"
we're better friends than ever since then. still fancy her, mind...
― CharlieNo4, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:53 (seventeen years ago)
smooth move, charlieno4.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:54 (seventeen years ago)
luckily she said "oh well then, i'd better break up with my boyfriend and we'll just get married and live happily ever after, m'kay?" and gave me a very old-fashioned look that said "really, after all this time, what did you think i'd say?"
this is not a fun thing to have said to you.
sorry homes. empathies.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:54 (seventeen years ago)
Don't forgot to get pissed and phone her at 3 in the morning. Women love that.
― Noodle Vague, Monday, 22 October 2007 16:58 (seventeen years ago)
Most behaviours you see in romantic comedies are perfect normally ways to ensnare women. Try some.
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:00 (seventeen years ago)
classic you're 14, pathetic if you're an adult
― dally, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:15 (seventeen years ago)
die
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:16 (seventeen years ago)
You wanna know the real moral of this story? Don't act on things you dream about. Sure, the reverie (on Thursday evening) unlocked a suppressed passion, and sure I was right to at least ascertain where I stood, but in the cold light of day, anything happening between us would be pretty goddamn far-fetched. She's two years older than me, vastly more experienced in matters of love, extremely good-looking, and nigh-on unattainable. Mentioning the dream (I hasten to add, a fully chaste affair) in the letter may or may not have been an error.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:24 (seventeen years ago)
i don't think you can expect a full-on positive response from a letter. you have to be in the room.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:26 (seventeen years ago)
yeah, that's kinda what I've realised. can't pull any captain wentworth shit unless the feeling's clearly mutual. should have played it cooler and asked her for a drink. curse this impetuous passion of mine.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:28 (seventeen years ago)
Don't act on things you dream about
DUDE. this is so wrong.
― grimly fiendish, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:34 (seventeen years ago)
it sounds like you just came on too strong. once the girl can sense your desperation, you're done for.
― bell_labs, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:39 (seventeen years ago)
i want to say that works both ways.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:40 (seventeen years ago)
i know it is. i'm trying to convince myself that i made a mistake when i didn't. if you dream about asking a girl out, and the wish is fulfilled, it's pretty goddamn clear your subconscious is telling you something.
and hey, this is now a challenge, to act as maturely, as unflappably, and as genuinely around her as i can. who knows what might change.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:43 (seventeen years ago)
(not that I can try anything. that would be a stupid, stupid error. i'm actually srsly considering hitting the town tonight, just to draw a line under the whole weekend.)
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:44 (seventeen years ago)
Wait, while there's an argument to be made for not chasing your dreams, your story here doesn't seem to give any evidence towards it. You got rejected, sure, but that's... like, that's just not so bad. I've certainly had worse happen to me when I've been in your situation.
― Casuistry, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:51 (seventeen years ago)
yes. go out. get pissed. DRAW THE LINE.
― grimly fiendish, Monday, 22 October 2007 17:57 (seventeen years ago)
better to get it out dude. worst case you can at least move on. limbo's no place for a bro to be.
― s1ocki, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:05 (seventeen years ago)
1. say it in person 2. play it cool, no 'i dream about u night and day' 3. realize that there is a chance u will be rejected and be ready to accept it
― deej, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:07 (seventeen years ago)
'be ready to accept it' easier said than done but other fish etc. a lot of times awkward, one-sided crushes tend to be irrational putting a person on a pedestal type shit. She is not 'nigh unnattainable,' shes a person you're putting a lot of value on and its probably partly justified but also ... shes human. chill
― deej, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:09 (seventeen years ago)
yeh, you should try imagining her naked on the bog ... er, forget it.
― grimly fiendish, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:10 (seventeen years ago)
sux2bu
― and what, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:10 (seventeen years ago)
1. I failed to do. 2. The letter was a bit cooler than that, but not much. 3. I did realise, but I didn't really prepare.
you forgot 4. less handwringing. :D
xposts: no you didn't! :D :D
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:11 (seventeen years ago)
Don't dream about things you plan to act about.
― Alba, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:11 (seventeen years ago)
next time a pretty girl i know IRL appears in the sylvan mists of surrealism and brutal psychology that is a dream of mine, i shall attempt to put grimly's advice into effect.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:13 (seventeen years ago)
how the fuck is it only 2:45 in the afternoon here
― El Tomboto, Monday, 22 October 2007 18:43 (seventeen years ago)
LJ out. jol to get poppage.
aim uglier next time, it works eventually.
― darraghmac, Monday, 22 October 2007 20:23 (seventeen years ago)
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41ZKX8WDEGL._SS500_.jpg
Louis you should totally buy this book, it's both an awesome piece of literature written by a one of the most empathetic authors living and a fantastic piece of advice that will pay off immediately.
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 21:43 (seventeen years ago)
oh man the goldmine of classic posts to be uncovered in lj's application of 'the game'
― deej, Monday, 22 October 2007 21:45 (seventeen years ago)
that book has already provoked one insanely long thread, but fuck it, why not two.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 22 October 2007 21:56 (seventeen years ago)
I already know about 'The Game'. Who do you think I am, some pig-ignorant shut-in who has no idea about current cultural trends? (Don't answer that one.)
Such books, especially those teaching the secrets of salesmanship, are totally and utterly soulless, and I refuse to touch them with a bargepole.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:20 (seventeen years ago)
but pretty girls are soulless, dude. you're gonna end up popping mingers
― ken c, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:23 (seventeen years ago)
Louis I, and i imagine at least twenty other ILXors, will paypal you £10 if you spend one month applying all of Strauss's techniques to the women on your course.
― Dom Passantino, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:26 (seventeen years ago)
Day 1: Buy gold watch Day 5: Employ permanent wingman, who must be short and ugly but quite funny Day 8: Nose job Day 13: Start turning nice girls down; who wants them? Day 24: Rohypnol
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:33 (seventeen years ago)
you should have written in the letter that you wanted to kiss her "sweet wet cunt"
― elan, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:54 (seventeen years ago)
seemed to work for robbie
haha! the thought actually crossed my mind. but...nah.
― Just got offed, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:55 (seventeen years ago)
it has to be a parapraxis, see. can't be sending those off on purpose.
that only matters to lit critics, not girls you want to bone
― elan, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:56 (seventeen years ago)
but it's time to move on. are there any cousins visiting?
― elan, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:58 (seventeen years ago)
sorry it didn't work out, louis. but there will be other girls. i am not sure these first move letters ever work for anyone. i can't think of a single instance when they have helped. girls read them aloud to each other and either die from laughter or say sadly, 'he's really nice but....' don't ever send one again. i say this as friend, not foe.
― estela, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:58 (seventeen years ago)
-- deej, Monday, October 22, 2007 5:45 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link
oh man
― and what, Monday, 22 October 2007 23:59 (seventeen years ago)
also estela is right, basically you have to make friends w/ girls & let them think they're seducing you
― and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:00 (seventeen years ago)
well ok, she's not a poncy literature student who'd take the outburst as a pure expression of passionate lust rather than a vulgar turn-off.
cousins? nah. plenty more gravel in the driveway.
cheers estela! i honestly think my letter wasn't that laughable, but 'tis true i could (yet again) have come across as 'sweet' rather than sexy. 'sweet' is generally code for 'not in a million years'. no, i will not send one again. tete-a-tete from now on.
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:01 (seventeen years ago)
ethan, i've played the ultra-long game before, but the downside is, i'm really bad at knowing when to make a decisive move.
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:03 (seventeen years ago)
(getting there, though! my main problem is the continual obsession with finding the right girl. today's incident isn't one i'll regret, because i've at least shown myself not to be compromising. PLUS, i know to avoid sending love-letters.)
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:07 (seventeen years ago)
its not the ultra-long game, im just saying spend a couple nights playing board games or some shit before you bust out the sonnets
― and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:08 (seventeen years ago)
ya second-move letters work wonders
― deeznuts, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:09 (seventeen years ago)
-- and what, Tuesday, October 23, 2007 12:00 AM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
so very very OTM. I don't think I've made the first move in literally years, and believe me, it's better for everybody involved. do be prepared to go for long periods without sex tho.
― will, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:10 (seventeen years ago)
if you spend like two weeks drinking & chilling out every couple days & she still doesnt want the dick shes never gonna
― and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:10 (seventeen years ago)
so you either move on or stay 'just friends' either way you dont end up looking like some poncey tard w/ a lonely hard-on
― and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:11 (seventeen years ago)
have you stopped to think that if you find the right girl now you'll miss out on all the wrong girls.
― estela, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:12 (seventeen years ago)
yeah, ethan is right to a degree, but i do think (in this culture at least) it's generally best to at least ask the girl to dinner. this i've done successfully a few times. it's the next bit that i find tricky. maybe board games really are the answer; been getting back into chess recently...
again, this has been the case in previous times. i'm prepared to be far more proactive and decisive nowadays, hence why i acted on this one. didn't act in the right way, but you live and learn.
formal dinner with a ladies' drinking society this thursday, i'm prepared for all sorts of wrong. :D
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:15 (seventeen years ago)
(in this culture at least)
http://www.ozebook.com/copeland.jpg
― and what, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:17 (seventeen years ago)
one offer's one's horse to the lady, and one walks tenderly beside, picking dandelions and braiding them into a wreath for her hair.
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:19 (seventeen years ago)
-- estela, Monday, October 22, 2007 7:12 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
ha this is great
― deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:22 (seventeen years ago)
-- and what, Monday, October 22, 2007 7:00 PM (22 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
this is so tru they pretend u are supposed to make the first move, but youre supposed to make the first move the way they expect you to make the first move
― deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:23 (seventeen years ago)
xpost: dorothy parker-esque wisdom be droppin'
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:23 (seventeen years ago)
crushes mean very little in the grand scheme of things people get over it (them)
― youn, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:25 (seventeen years ago)
I want a determining condition a classifying restraint in my life.
my dumbass kind of fucked up a crush situation recently that i had the upper hand on initially, she was into me but ... i showed my cards a little too soon. but it happens, roll w/ the punches etc
― deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:32 (seventeen years ago)
i think the letter was a mistake
― omar little, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:36 (seventeen years ago)
tbh i'm feeling pretty much over this one already, so it was a damn good thing i did something about it, regardless of whether the medium was an error (which it was).
― Just got offed, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:39 (seventeen years ago)
i think letters work in fanciful theory and rarely if ever in actuality.
― omar little, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 00:41 (seventeen years ago)
who writes a letter? send a text
― deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:02 (seventeen years ago)
much better to sharpie a dick on her forehead whilst she slumbers
― elan, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:03 (seventeen years ago)
you gotta know when to hold 'em and when to fold 'em bro.
― ken c, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:04 (seventeen years ago)
xpost or "<your name> woz ere" on her ass amirite
― ken c, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:06 (seventeen years ago)
true dat, gotta be discreet
― elan, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:07 (seventeen years ago)
like they say, discretion is the better part of modassty
― elan, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 01:09 (seventeen years ago)
Ah Louis, I went out and got hammered for you last night. Didn't pull, like.
― Noodle Vague, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 11:32 (seventeen years ago)
girls read them aloud to each other and either die from laughter or say sadly, 'he's really nice but....'
or -- and i wish i could find a link to the story, 'cos this happened to some poor fucker a couple of years ago and was all over the UK news for a day or so, but i don't have time -- pass them on by e-mail until suddenly half the world's getting "heh, look what this dude sent to some lass he met at a party!" dropping into their inbox.
so yeh, good work on not e-mailing, louis! just in case ...
― grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 14:06 (seventeen years ago)
never put anything in writing, that's just some 'advice' from a 'concerned associate'.
kapeesh?
― darraghmac, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 14:25 (seventeen years ago)
follow max r's advice: one phone for bros, one for hos.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 14:27 (seventeen years ago)