Faraway, So Close Wenders - not only a terrible film but possibly the worst film ever made.
Bitter Moon Polanski's cringeworthy "thriller"
Pret A Porter There are lots to choose from with Altman but i'd go for this over the equally dreadful Cookie's Fortune and Short Cuts. Pret is another contender for worst movie of all time, for sure.
― jed (jed_e_3), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:02 (twenty-two years ago)
and probably the Costner/baseball movie too, but chances are against me ever verifying this.
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― adaml (adaml), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:16 (twenty-two years ago)
Bet she still has nightmares about it.
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:17 (twenty-two years ago)
dude, since when was Polanski's classy?
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:18 (twenty-two years ago)
Interiors
September
Celebrity
Shadows and Fog
Quite a few!
― jed (jed_e_3), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― adaml (adaml), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― jones (actual), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:25 (twenty-two years ago)
gangs of new york owns this thread but let's keep going anyway
― jones (actual), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― jones (actual), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― jones (actual), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:48 (twenty-two years ago)
The whole thing just felt like a bad coke jones. Everything and everyone involved in the plan is in-credibly stupid, and 15 minutes in you know it's all only going to get stupider. Also Sam reaching for all this arty grave symbolic stuff--those fucking flocks of crows, again and again and again, the endless sledgehammer foreshadowing--"Hmmm, I wonder if this is gonna turn out all right. What's that? Sorry, I can't hear you over these CHIMES OF DOOM here." Just seemed utterly lifeless in this horribly strained, empty, tense, pretentious way. Trying to be way more serious/mature than I think Sam can really pull off.
But the shotgunning is good, and the movie springs briefly to life when Gary Cole shows ...
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Monday, 20 October 2003 22:58 (twenty-two years ago)
(unless it's the best)
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:14 (twenty-two years ago)
(at least nobody expects anything good from the cover of Jack)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:16 (twenty-two years ago)
(and yes: Days of Thunder was directed by tony "the properly-rated scott" scott)
― jones (actual), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:16 (twenty-two years ago)
hmm yes i think that Jack probably can.
― jed (jed_e_3), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:23 (twenty-two years ago)
The Scott Brothers really qualify trackwise more for Bad Director, Good Movie.
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Little Big Macher (llamasfur), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)
for my money Wild at Heart is a worse film than Dune.
― jed (jed_e_3), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:39 (twenty-two years ago)
You're supposed to flush the crack down the toilet, not gargle with it!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:39 (twenty-two years ago)
(Fire Walk, anyone?)
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― adaml (adaml), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:51 (twenty-two years ago)
worst - black rain
― jones (actual), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:52 (twenty-two years ago)
Heh. Exactly how I feel about Lebowski.
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:54 (twenty-two years ago)
Not me.
Errr...GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!
― adaml (adaml), Monday, 20 October 2003 23:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 00:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 00:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 00:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 00:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 00:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 00:19 (twenty-two years ago)
Randall Reynolds to thread!!
― jackson anderville (sanlazaro), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 00:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 00:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 00:56 (twenty-two years ago)
[disappears in cloud of smoke]
― jackson anderville (sanlazaro), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 01:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― rick lazarus (sanlazaro), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 01:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 01:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 01:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 01:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 01:19 (twenty-two years ago)
Wait, Dan Hedaya can do no wrong, his scenes are awesome too.
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 01:33 (twenty-two years ago)
does spielberg count as a good director any more? probably not. but Hook is one of the worst movies i've ever seen in my life. i never saw always though.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 21 October 2003 01:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward, Tuesday, 21 October 2003 02:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 03:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 03:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward, Tuesday, 21 October 2003 03:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 03:54 (twenty-two years ago)
------you're insane, best horror movie ever
― sucka (sucka), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 05:00 (twenty-two years ago)
Apparently, "bad" movies from great directors are among my favorite movies ever. Great directors ought to make "bad" movies more often... instead of "good" ones (Chinatown, North By Northwest, M*A*S*H, all of which pale in my opinion to the aforementioned "bad" films).
To keep it going, I also like Gertrud more than The Passion of Joan of Arc, Phenomena more than Suspiria, Barry Lyndon much much more than Clockwork Orange, Simon of the Desert more than Viridiana, and The Private Files of J. Edgar Hoover more than Q—The Winged Serpent. All of the ones I prefer have been called "bad" on occasion.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 05:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sean (Sean), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 07:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 08:02 (twenty-two years ago)
I am worried that Bruno Dumont's new film is gonna suck.
I didn't like Exotica at all, tho liked lots of other Egoyan esp. Felicia's Journey which most seemed to hate..I also really liked Neil Jordan's In Dreams, but Interview with the Vampire was kinda unfortunate.
― daria g (daria g), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 09:06 (twenty-two years ago)
And not that I think Wes Anderson is all that good, but Bottle Rocket = absolutely horrible! argh.
And I don't know if Herzog is generally my cup of tea, but his Nosferatu was ridiculous.
― daria g (daria g), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 09:13 (twenty-two years ago)
reverse the order of those films and i'm with you.
i kinda sorta liked thelma and louise: am i insane?
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 09:22 (twenty-two years ago)
Nosferatu is ridiculous. I still like it though.
― anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 13:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 14:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Baaderist (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 14:19 (twenty-two years ago)
i can't see sterling's picture - what is it?
― jones (actual), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 14:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 14:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 16:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 16:23 (twenty-two years ago)
bitter moon rulez! so does 9th gate!
― s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 17:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 18:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 18:41 (twenty-two years ago)
*ducks*
― Chuck Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 18:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Tuesday, 21 October 2003 19:04 (twenty-two years ago)
i just saw intolerable movie, sorry cruelty.
― jed (jed_e_3), Monday, 27 October 2003 02:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew (enneff), Monday, 27 October 2003 04:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 27 October 2003 04:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 27 October 2003 04:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 27 October 2003 05:35 (twenty-two years ago)
Also, Ridley Scott-wise -- The Duelists is wonderful and nuts. The guy hit home runs his first three times at the plate. What the fuck happened? I love the cinematography in Black Rain, though. It needs to be seen on a big screen.
That's probably an issue with a lot of these choices. I mean, how can you watch 1900 on video? Movies that are meant to be watched as movies often seem long and draggy when viewed on a t.v. T.V. turns Todd Solondz into a genius and Tarkovsky to shit.
― musicmope (musicmope), Sunday, 9 November 2003 17:44 (twenty-two years ago)
Would that that were true...
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Sunday, 9 November 2003 18:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Bob Shaw (Bob Shaw), Sunday, 9 November 2003 18:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 01:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 03:55 (twenty-two years ago)
Altman: Ready To WearWenders: a tie between Million Dollar Hotel and The End Of ViolenceWilder: Buddy BuddyRaimi: The Quick And The DeadDe Palma: (assuming you consider him to be a good director) Mission To Mars, Bonfire Of The VanitiesCarpenter: Memoirs of an Invisible ManRidley Scott: 1492: Conquest of Paradise
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 10:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Baaderist (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 11:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 18:10 (twenty-two years ago)
1) I'm not interested in hearing much about De Palma from anyone who doesn't consider De Palma a good director; and 2) the De Palma "auteurists" are far more likely to dog on The Untouchables, Wise Guys, and Mission: Impossible (though I rather like the last one). Mission to Mars was sort of a warm-up for the rebirth that was Femme Fatale.
I'm not quite as massive a Carpenter disciple as I am of De Palma, but I would have to disagree with you s1utsky and suggest that there are only 2 million that could appear on this list. I managed to miss most of them. The only one that I was underwhelmed by (even though I still found lots to like) was Vampires.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 18:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ben Mott (Ben Mott), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 18:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 18:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 18:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 18:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 19:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 19:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)
wenders is ok when he isn't trying to pave over his inner namby-pamby – WE CAN STILL SEE YOU you twee little weirdo. his version of america is pretty dimwitted and his "fascination" with it even more so
― jones (actual), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 19:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andy K (Andy K), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 19:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 20:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andy K (Andy K), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 20:54 (twenty-two years ago)
This is an excellent point. I still want to buy "Written In The West", thoug.
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 21:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 21:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 21:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)
andy I guess my point with peter b. was "what have you done for me lately?" which is unfair, sure, but if a director's made mostly bad movies over the last 20 years or so does he still count as a good director?
― s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 21:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 21:11 (twenty-two years ago)
I kind of think the answer to this is "yes" and "no" at the same time. If said director ever purported to make "good" movies, then they probably get our attention because of what they used to be, and what we know they are capable of?
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 21:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 21:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 21:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 21:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 21:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 03:39 (twenty-two years ago)
polanski I will defend to the death!
but thank you for agreeing with me in principle!
― s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 12 November 2003 06:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― EComplex (EComplex), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 18:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― g--ff (gcannon), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pangolino again, Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:28 (twenty-one years ago)
Godard - In Praise of LoveFassbinder - QuerelleOtto Preminger - SkidooWoody Allen - CelebrityChaplin - Limelight
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 19:42 (twenty-one years ago)
2046 is the newest contender for worst film ever made by a respected film maker.
― jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:29 (twenty-one years ago)
Did I say something about Ninth Gate upthread, then? I saw it (dubbed) in Bologna, so I don't think I had any idea what was going on. It looked silly.
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:33 (twenty-one years ago)
robert altman sux (exc. 'popeye') (and only cs it's cinema's 'mario 2').
― cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:40 (twenty-one years ago)
xp yes, and he turns into SATAN at the end or something?
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:47 (twenty-one years ago)
Why isn't Ramsey doing the Lovely Bones now? I neither hated nor loved the book, I thought it was okay, but I think that Jackson will make a much more entertaining film, if Heavenly Creatures is anything to go by.
― kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 20:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:57 (twenty-one years ago)
xpI like Barry Lyndon but I haven't seen it since I was about 17.
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 21:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chrchuckis Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:05 (twenty-one years ago)
i disagree emphatically.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:06 (twenty-one years ago)
(Well, close to. I even like the blowhard Hemingway guy.)
― Chrchuckis Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chrchuckis Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:10 (twenty-one years ago)
You Altman fans much have a far far higher tolerance for Eliot Gould's schtick than I do.
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:11 (twenty-one years ago)
The subject of bad coen films begins and ends with Intolerable Cruelty and The Ladykillers, although I could MAYBE see The Man Who Wasn't There, just because it's awfully slow and beslaved to its source material in a way that none of their previous films were.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chrchuckis Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:18 (twenty-one years ago)
xp hi chuck
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:20 (twenty-one years ago)
I liked it, but I can understand an argument against it, whereas I can't even fathom thinking that anything other than those three are the worst coen films.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chrchuckis Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chrchuckis Tatum (Chuck Tatum), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:30 (twenty-one years ago)
And everyone I know either loves it or likes it somewhat.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:33 (twenty-one years ago)
Of all the universally crap movies the Coens made BETWEEN Raising Arizona and The Man Who Wasn't There, Hudsucker is the least crap. (Robbins with the wastebasket on his foot made me howl.)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)
Boo!
Hudsucker is the least crap.
Yay! (though I disagree)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 22:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:40 (twenty-one years ago)
Strange, I've heard the except opposite (esp. as it seems to captures none of the heat of Vietnam--it's like the driest looking Southeast Asian film ever.)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 23:50 (twenty-one years ago)
Let me just quote this so I can read it again...The Long Goodbye is so by far the WORST adaptation of a Chandler novel
Wow, talk about missing the point.
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 20 January 2005 07:50 (twenty-one years ago)
FUCK YOU MAN ALIEN KICKS YOUR ASS LIKE A GALLAGHER KILLS WATER EMLONS YOU ARE A BASTARD PEOPLE
― latebloomer, tru xenomorph soldier 4 life (latebloomer), Thursday, 20 January 2005 07:55 (twenty-one years ago)
>Ryan O'Neal vs. Tom Cruise! I would still take Tom Cruise
But the point is that Redmond Barry is a fortunate buffoon, and Dr Bill is a confused, voyeuristic pantywaist. It's called typecasting!
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 20 January 2005 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Thursday, 20 January 2005 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― :| (....), Thursday, 20 January 2005 15:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 20 January 2005 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)
"The only Chandler novel I've read is The Big Sleep, and it seemed unmistakably the work of a hateful prick. Hawks improved it for film."
I can see liking The Long Goodbye if you hate Chandler (also if you like boring pointless meandering pieces of pseudo intellectual tripe, but apparently I am just "missing the point" so feel free to ignore me.) I also hate Alan Rudoplph with a passion btw so maybe it IS just a deep seeded hatred of LA at work, but I doubt it.
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 20 January 2005 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Shmool McShmool (shmuel), Thursday, 20 January 2005 23:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Friday, 21 January 2005 00:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Friday, 21 January 2005 05:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 21 January 2005 06:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 21 January 2005 06:21 (twenty-one years ago)
What about enjoying Chandler and also enjoying Altman taking the piss out of Chandler? I suppose I can see hating the Long Goodbye if you're looking for some kind of "faithful interpretation" of Chandler but wasn't that already done to death in the '40s?
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Friday, 21 January 2005 06:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Friday, 21 January 2005 06:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― chew on that muthafuckahs (slutsky), Friday, 21 January 2005 06:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 21 January 2005 10:36 (twenty-one years ago)
what asshole said 'dune'?
― cozen (Cozen), Friday, 21 January 2005 11:49 (twenty-one years ago)
Oh, man! The Front Page!
Buddy Buddy too, tho i don't recall if I actually saw it. I like Fedora and Avanti!
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 21 January 2005 14:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 21 January 2005 18:09 (twenty-one years ago)
I think Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid does a better job of this than The Long Goodbye frankly.
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 21 January 2005 18:26 (twenty-one years ago)
No way. Ghost Dog.
Yeah, more like Wild at Heart. Oh wait, someone already mentioned it but it bears repeating.
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Friday, 21 January 2005 23:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Friday, 21 January 2005 23:40 (twenty-one years ago)
What??? Are you going to rep for Coffee and Cigarettes now??? With a straight face??? Oh wait...it's YOU.
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Friday, 21 January 2005 23:41 (twenty-one years ago)
I like Wild At Heart more than I like the Twin Peaks movie, but it's not as incredible as I was hoping it would be.
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 21 January 2005 23:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 21 January 2005 23:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― .ada.m. (nordicskilla), Friday, 21 January 2005 23:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 22 January 2005 00:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Saturday, 22 January 2005 00:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― ade (Adrian Langston), Saturday, 22 January 2005 00:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Saturday, 22 January 2005 00:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― ade (Adrian Langston), Saturday, 22 January 2005 00:24 (twenty-one years ago)
David Lynch - "Wild at Heart". Quite emphatically so, for me. His style becomes something of a cliche here, only fully to be re-established with "Mulholland Dr.", although parts of "Lost Highway" are great, and I do like his S2 "Twin Peaks" episodes.
But there's nothing really worthwhile to hold onto in WAH; a crying shame that he chose to go off and work on that instead of sticking with "Twin Peaks" more closely after the first series...
― Tom May (Tom May), Saturday, 22 January 2005 00:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Saturday, 22 January 2005 00:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Saturday, 22 January 2005 00:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 22 January 2005 02:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 22 January 2005 02:52 (twenty-one years ago)