Matrix Revolutions

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
i'm pretty excited about seeing it tho i think it's going to have the exact same problems the second one had (the epic Neo vs Smith battle has me worried). the trailer reveals several things (you see a crescent moon in the sky which suggests they somehow get rid of all those nasty think dark clouds magically, hopefully not ala Total Recall absurdity level). might go see it at the Odeon in Leicester Square followed by some bopping at the Asylum (usual mash-up mentalism), anyone here interested?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)

oh wait it's out nationwide from Wednesday not Thursday

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 11:54 (twenty-two years ago)

how about the Odeon on Holloway Road steve?

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 3 November 2003 11:58 (twenty-two years ago)

sounds good, i'm gonna tilt my chair for a bit and then maybe book a ticket online

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 11:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Easy with the tilt steve, don't overdo it!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:11 (twenty-two years ago)

7:30pm?

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:11 (twenty-two years ago)

it's a....date...

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:13 (twenty-two years ago)

7:30 Wednesday? I might not make the film, but i could have a pint in the Swimmer afterwards.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:15 (twenty-two years ago)

COuld you do later Pete?

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:18 (twenty-two years ago)

I think I'm actually seeing the film on Thursday with someone else, and will probably lack desire to see it twice.

I can double check on this. But you and Steve book away (if need be) remembering your Student Discount where applicable.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Well all I can say is that i hope to god it is better than the matrix reloaded. Sadly based on on the second i will not be rushing to the cinema to see the third.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:21 (twenty-two years ago)

reloaded = one of the worst 2 hours i have spent in the cinema.

jed (jed_e_3), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Aw it wasn't as bad as Sliver.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Two words: Monica Bellucci.

It can't be that bad.

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:35 (twenty-two years ago)

there are already threads for people to remark about how much they thought the last film sucked, yawn

Tracer i booked a ticket, could meet at that Swimmer pub i guess?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes I believe we could!

I am surfing Odeon's shadowy and mysterious website now.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Its all in Java. It is MADNESS!!!!

Pete (Pete), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:41 (twenty-two years ago)

there's a bug that let me enter my e-mail address but not password in order to book. how plebian.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:51 (twenty-two years ago)

password?? dude you don't have to register

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Accessible Odeon website = http://www.dracos.co.uk/odeon/

Alan (Alan), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:55 (twenty-two years ago)

(i.e. cookie-less javascript-less)

Alan (Alan), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:55 (twenty-two years ago)

But you can't book on that one Alan, removing the point.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:56 (twenty-two years ago)

i look forward to talk of the actual film ;)

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:57 (twenty-two years ago)

deleted scene

http://keanuweb.com/_t/krmbt001_.jpg

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 12:59 (twenty-two years ago)

If Pete has the desire to see Revolutions again he can use that time machine to see it with us on Wednesday.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 3 November 2003 13:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I was going to go with Napolean but he threw a huge strop and wanted to see Finding Nemo.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 3 November 2003 13:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Understandable.

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 3 November 2003 13:10 (twenty-two years ago)

why would someone go to the trouble of running an entire alternative odeon site like that? is it something you could feel so passionate about?

jed (jed_e_3), Monday, 3 November 2003 13:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Maybe he wants a job in the Odeon web design dept...

Pete (Pete), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:30 (twenty-two years ago)

how many revolutions do we get for our money anyhow?

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:31 (twenty-two years ago)

There are plenty of those -- the National Rail one's useful. Can't remember link, but ntk.net has the juice on this sort of thing.

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)

it is a revolution of the mind and the spirit as much as the body

so 3.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)

that's about three euros per revolution.

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:33 (twenty-two years ago)

well it's better than "the patriot" anyhow.

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Someone having a crap in both of my ears and both of my eyes whilst me eating special shit flavour popcorn would be better than the Patriot.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:50 (twenty-two years ago)

there's only one way to confirm this...

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Even in the trailers for Reloaded you could see the weaknesses in the CGI, but the trailer I saw for Revolutions looked nothing short of brilliant. Some of the images from the trailer (particularly the blindfolded Ted Theodore Logan telekinesisizing the sentinels & such above-ground wildness) have really gotten stuck in my mind.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:53 (twenty-two years ago)

No, I refuse to watch the Patriot again.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:54 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't understand this CGI criticism. the mecha-bots look fine for example. i saw nothing that would hinder my enjoyment of it in that department.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 14:56 (twenty-two years ago)

I wonder if this one will have Not Donald Sutherland in it, too.

Kingfish (Kingfish), Monday, 3 November 2003 15:12 (twenty-two years ago)

hahaha

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 3 November 2003 15:15 (twenty-two years ago)

I doubt if Matress III will be as profound as the fight againt the machines in Cleopatra 2525

Alan (Alan), Monday, 3 November 2003 15:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Or even Morris 2273 (new Danniel Peacock futuristic Channel Five brane exploder. Like Harry And Cosh but set in the future AND the past).

Pete (Pete), Monday, 3 November 2003 15:21 (twenty-two years ago)

They're screening this fucker on a bunch of IMAXes around America. One of the screenings is in Columbus. I will be in Columbus on Wednesday for an insurance class. Coincidence?

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 3 November 2003 15:26 (twenty-two years ago)

ebert & roeper reviewed this last night - 'we are giving this two thumbs up even though it sucks ass' was the gist of it.

jones (actual), Monday, 3 November 2003 16:34 (twenty-two years ago)

As long as it keeps me distracted 'til Return of the King, I'm good to go.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 3 November 2003 16:57 (twenty-two years ago)

That's what extended Two Towers DVDs are for.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:13 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't believe that anyone could be at all even intrigued by this after the absolute shittiness of the first Matrix sequel

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:20 (twenty-two years ago)

that bombshell is FAR more fascinating of course. wft, yeh right, every single minute of The Matrix Reloaded was OH SO TERRIBLE, no redeeming features at all. oh no. i mean, even if there was one poor aspect of it that would just render the whole thing completely useless junk wouldn't it? of course. just like with albums - if there's one crap track on there then the whole thing is a shit waste of time.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:23 (twenty-two years ago)

hey, I was super buzzed for Matrix ReLoaded, but it was shitty. Really really shitty. Like Metallica ReLoaded.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Fuck that noize, the freeway scene was one of the best action-movie-sequences of all time.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I love steve and nick!

teeny (teeny), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:26 (twenty-two years ago)

reloaded was a lot better than the first - the main flaw being the rather boring first half.

ryan (ryan), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:27 (twenty-two years ago)

the only criticisms i accept of Reloaded was some poor dialogue and occasional poor delivery from Neo and Morpheus. no complaints about the CGI at all, thought it was fine. and as i said before if you just treat it as live action anime then it's more fitting.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:29 (twenty-two years ago)

"Goodnight Zion, sweet dreams"
"No, you do not really know someone, until you fight them"
the Neo/Chancellor exchange

these are the worst bits of dialogue in the film, the only REALLY bad ones i think. cut those out and i'd be happier.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:32 (twenty-two years ago)

this whole series seem scientifically calculated to completely disinterest me

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:33 (twenty-two years ago)

hurray!

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:33 (twenty-two years ago)

first of all the green pallete

second the philosophical bombast

then the actors

then the ultraviolence

then the sci-fi premise

then the saturation marketing

then the "cutting-edge digital technology"

then...

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:37 (twenty-two years ago)

um, then I enjoy a fucking movie?

teeny (teeny), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:41 (twenty-two years ago)

this whole series seem scientifically calculated to completely disinterest me

you have great taste in movies amateur!st but i think i feel exactly the opposite! then again i am a sci-fi geek.

ryan (ryan), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:41 (twenty-two years ago)

so enjoy it, what do you care what i think teeny?

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:42 (twenty-two years ago)

sorry ams't, I will not include green in your scarf.

teeny (teeny), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:43 (twenty-two years ago)

ah see i like all those things

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:44 (twenty-two years ago)

so amateurist going to see Matrix Revolutions would be as pointless for you as...posting on here that you're not interested?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:45 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't mind any of those things either but Reloaded was still hogwash

jones (actual), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Those things could work but we all know my own particular beef with the movies by now.

um, then I enjoy a fucking movie?

The MatriXXX.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:46 (twenty-two years ago)

so amateurist going to see Matrix Revolutions would be as pointless for you as...posting on here that you're not interested?

yes and considerably more expensive

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I already shamefully covered how hot I thought the rave scene was; I know it was awful, but it was still hot. :(

teeny (teeny), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:47 (twenty-two years ago)

It was just too hippy for me.

Nicolars (Nicole), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Fluke, the rave act for people who can't be arsed to go to raves. I guess.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:49 (twenty-two years ago)

during Morpheus's speech and the subsequent rave scene i just told myself that 'it's cool, this probably really is how people would behave and react given the situation they're in and after all that's happened'. it happened during the Blitz too you know. down in the tube stations everyone was semi-naked and gurning like bastards to Fluke.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:52 (twenty-two years ago)

um, then I enjoy a fucking movie?
then I enjoy some other fucking movie! Like LXG! Ha! haHA!

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:53 (twenty-two years ago)

if this one features a massive dance-off between humans and robots I might change my mind about the last one

jones (actual), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:56 (twenty-two years ago)

i can't help but think i will not enjoy this one as much as the last one (which i enjoyed more than the first one). as long as they do another Animatrix (surely this film isn't going to end with all the machines destroyed and everything back to how it once was?)

stevem (blueski), Monday, 3 November 2003 17:58 (twenty-two years ago)

i just hope the sequel will feature more robots in jaunty hats & monocles, like the Animatrix did.

http://www.scanartcentral.net/wthumbs/rich_bot_bender.jpg

Kingfish (Kingfish), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:15 (twenty-two years ago)

If the new one has robot zombies in it, I'll probably pay full price to see it.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:16 (twenty-two years ago)

The VP of my division has roped us all into seeing this at 7am on wednesday! I'd love to be able to complain about this, but I'm really excited!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:20 (twenty-two years ago)

well, that would have me excited too!

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:20 (twenty-two years ago)

I do like the paranoia about web downloads. "We've GOT to show everything at the same exact time around the world or we won't make any money at all!"

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I want to be all excited by this but I never got round to seeing the first one and so don't know what's supposed to be happening.

But the second one had pretty fights! And stuff.

cis (cis), Monday, 3 November 2003 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)

here we go again

s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 3 November 2003 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)

my buddy wanted to get like 20 people to dress up in the Smith look and converge on a movie theater.

then we told him to go first. We'd follow.

we'll see what happens.

Kingfish (Kingfish), Monday, 3 November 2003 19:18 (twenty-two years ago)

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=84&e=8&u=/pagesix/matrixtricks

teeny (teeny), Monday, 3 November 2003 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)

there are some slight spoilers in that link.

teeny (teeny), Monday, 3 November 2003 19:39 (twenty-two years ago)

sorry to be so crabby upthread. i don't know what got into me. i hope everyone enjoys this film.

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 3 November 2003 20:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey, well fuck you too man! ;-)

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 3 November 2003 20:50 (twenty-two years ago)

oh sorry, i mean, "fuck you all!"

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 3 November 2003 20:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Aw sweet, we love you too, Am!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 3 November 2003 20:56 (twenty-two years ago)

I like that this movie seems to promise a lot more IRL/non-inside-the-Matrix action, and I think a lot of the best of the graphic design comes from dealing with the burnt-out-Earth rather than the dreamy-reality-stretching that goes on in the Matrix.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 3 November 2003 20:56 (twenty-two years ago)

you know I gotta say, I've been holding back, but I don't think the trailer for this movie can possibly make it look any worse. sorry matrix-lovers I'm not trying to be a dick but I thought the last movie was a complete fiasco and I can't imagine them salvaging this one.

xp: that's exactly what worries me about it nick!

s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 3 November 2003 20:57 (twenty-two years ago)

dick

rob geary (rgeary), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 06:49 (twenty-two years ago)

just kidding s1utsky! are you gonna bother seeing it then? i actually rather liked the trailer. i'm a sucker for this stuff. i think the first one really can't be improved without fundamentally altering what it is (ie you could carp about some cheesy lines, but it's a sci fi hero story people), and the Matrix setting is intriguing enough that I'll happy sit through another couple hours there.

rob geary (rgeary), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 06:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I'll probably see it just to know... and for the (slim in my opinion) possibility that they may have re-found their footing.

s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 06:52 (twenty-two years ago)

what do you think about the possibility that it's really the second half of one film? i think this might make it better. if you stopped the first one an hour and ten minutes in you'd be fucking confused...i sort of feel that way about reloaded.

rob geary (rgeary), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 06:54 (twenty-two years ago)

I wonder if this one will have Not Donald Sutherland in it, too.

ha ha! i think he (the Architect?) specifically told Neo that they wouldn't meet again, right? seemed like an odd and interesting thing to say.

rob geary (rgeary), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 06:55 (twenty-two years ago)

well... that doesn't really wash with me, as I don't really think reloaded could in any way be the first half of a good movie. whereas the first matrix movie, for its flaws, had a lot of neat ideas (mostly visual--the telephone stuff for example), reloaded was totally dry. the first movie had its rhythm problems but when it was on it was ON--I never thought reloaded ever hit anything nearing that stride! it was so hermetic and self-congratulatory and plodding!

s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 06:59 (twenty-two years ago)

you've basically described my life so no wonder i'm right at home

rob geary (rgeary), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 07:16 (twenty-two years ago)

i actually agree with everything you put there though. except the action sequences in reloaded totally weren't dry! i do think they lacked what propelled the action sequences the first one, which was the sequence of (learn something that raises a question) -> (fight ensues from question, we learn something) -> (implications of knowledge from fight pondered, raising questions) -> (fight scene ensues from question)...etc.

also, kung fu.

rob geary (rgeary), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 07:18 (twenty-two years ago)

jeez that made no sense.

rob geary (rgeary), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 07:19 (twenty-two years ago)

no, I know what you mean, the reason I didn't really enjoy the (few) action sequences in reloaded was that there was nothing really at stake! neo's invincible, and I had no idea what was going on anyway

I still insist the multiple-smith thing looked way worse than anything in the first movie

s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 07:24 (twenty-two years ago)

neo's invincible
This was precisely my problem with the Neo action scenes in Reloaded. We know he can't die. Ergo, you must UTTERLY knock my socks off with what he can do for me to stay awake. This occasionally happened but not enough. But action bits with other characters = much better, as such the freeway scene did kick ass.

I agree on the effects thing; nothing in the first one looked bad at all! CG people are still not quite there. So I got more of a thrill from the sequences where actual people are doing the work more than the CG gang bang.

rob geary (rgeary), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 07:29 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah I must admit the most excited I got was during the freeway sequence, when other, actually vulnerable characters were involved

what was up with that whole bomb in the building thing at the end there though? what the hell was that all about? anyone have any idea?

s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 07:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Scripts marked "FILM" and "VIDEO GAME" got swapped by accident, I think

rob geary (rgeary), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 07:34 (twenty-two years ago)

and can we pretend that the guy who played the architect's real name is ronald sutherland?

s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 07:35 (twenty-two years ago)

what was up with that whole bomb in the building thing at the end there though? what the hell was that all about? anyone have any idea?

this was a security system to protect the source of the Matrix from being accessed by The One. But Neo is able to access it after they manage to shut the power down for just long enough (with Trinity, Niobi and co. providing enough distraction). Presumably the Architect figured Neo would be able to access the source anyway so set up the meeting to tell him what was going to happen.

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 10:21 (twenty-two years ago)

people who say the graphix in the fight scene with all the Smiths look too computer-ey -- the whole thing is taking place inside a computer program, remember??

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 13:03 (twenty-two years ago)

I think the reason most people disliked Reloaded was because they are pissed off that they didn't understand everything in one viewing. I don't think you're supposed to/able to, though. I saw it a few times in the theater and own the DVD, and I'm still finding new details in the plot that I missed the first time.

Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 4 November 2003 13:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I was annoyed that it turned completely into an action flick. And the highway scene was impressive, but went on forever.

Sean (Sean), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 13:12 (twenty-two years ago)

i am hoping it's the longest of the three

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 13:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Sean i was annoyed at Kill Bill for the same reason

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 13:25 (twenty-two years ago)

KB also had the whole "hm that's not quite a movie, is it?" feeling afterwards.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 13:33 (twenty-two years ago)

No, its the first half of one.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 13:39 (twenty-two years ago)

The difference is I walked into KB *expecting* non-stop action/violence, whereas I was hoping for a bit more from Reloaded.

Sean (Sean), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 13:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Reloaded was also criticised for having too much psycho-babble, cuh

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 13:44 (twenty-two years ago)

The funny thing is that a good slew of these positive arguments remind me of the defense of the recent Star Wars films in ways.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 13:48 (twenty-two years ago)

The funny thing is the disappointment I got from Matrix Reloaded was almost identitcal to the one I got walking out of The Phantom Menance.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 13:49 (twenty-two years ago)

people who say the graphix in the fight scene with all the Smiths look too computer-ey -- the whole thing is taking place inside a computer program, remember??

I was talking with somebody about this yesterday and had the realization that, in the film's context, this is a conflict between two very powerful systemic anomalies, and that the extent of their conflict putting a strain on the system itself to keep up doesn't seem quite so far-fetched in that sense.

(I still thought it looked k-stupid though.)

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 13:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought the fight with lots of Smith's looked like lots of people in badly made Smith masks, or in some cases no masks at all, having a big rhumble.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 13:57 (twenty-two years ago)

i am the only person in the world over 12 who loves the Brawl

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 13:59 (twenty-two years ago)

i think it was actually better than Uma vs Crazy 88...altho the latter certainly was superior in SOME ways (but not others)

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 14:00 (twenty-two years ago)

Not the only person, Steve! I thought they were aiming a little over the horizon as regards what can be done with the present technology, and for this I love them. The ramping-up nature of the scene, and the way the nature of the fight changes during it, are great, and better than the Bruce Lee "one or two at a time" of the KB fight.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 14:17 (twenty-two years ago)

No I love that scene too, but I do have criticisms of it is all; the way it increases intensity incrementally kinda lends to growing excitement, I just think they may have tried a little too hard with it.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 14:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Uma vs the Crazy 88 may very well be one of the greatest fight scenes ever filmed, particularly for the little touches (Uma using her blade to scope out the people behind her, the windmill/foot-chopping, the silhouette scene (!!!!!!), the bannister walking, the integration of wire tricks into a quasi-realistic situation, etc etc etc). The last time I was that gleeful at an action sequence, it was the first drunken fight in "Drunken Master II". (Other notables on my list would include the pole-top fight in "Iron Monkey", the Zhang Ziyi/Michelle Yeoh showdown in "CTHT" and the highway scene in "Matrix Reloaded".)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 14:23 (twenty-two years ago)

if you're interested in The Editing Room's version of the abridged script, check here

Suddenly, a bunch of other HUGO WEAVINGS show up. They
FIGHT to VIDEO GAME MUSIC. Despite all of the enormous
hype, it is extremely clear when the scene switches into
CGI-mode.
HUGO WEAVING
Why are you using kung fu? Can't
you jump inside us and delete us
like in the last movie? Isn't that
one of your super awesome powers?
KEANU REEVES
Nah, the only real new power I have
is flight.
HUGO WEAVING
That sucks.
KEANU REEVES
Not as badly as my appearance when
I do my little mid-air spin move
with this pole.

He fights and fights and fights and eventually gives up and
flies away....

Kingfish (Kingfish), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)

yeh you are otm really Dan, i was just wondering how Kill Bill's fight scenes were gonna be as fun and dynamic as Reloaded's...and they were right to focus on neat little touches, anthropomorphic movements, lighting (the silhouette scene (!!!!!!) indeed)...you see Wudan for about just 3 seconds and i love it for that! it's just like 'sure he knows Wudan, check it, but be quick!'

but still there was something about it that irked - perhaps just the predictability that you knew Uma was going to kill them all. whereas with Neo and 100 Smiths, he couldn't kill them and he realised he had to fly off - this was bemusing if not entirely unexpected

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 14:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Not as badly as my appearance when
I do my little mid-air spin move
with this pole.

this isn't as bad as everyone says - he is so minimally stylised anyway that it's hardly belief shattering that it's clearly a CGI render

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)

So I got more of a thrill from the sequences where actual people are doing the work more than the CG gang bang.

rockist.

(j/k)

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I think Kingfish's quoted bit is funny, but misses the point of the brawl. Neo is too cool/existentially dead to show it, but he has to be like, "what the fuck is going on" when Smith shows up. Not to mention when he copies himself. So, I think what's happening is that they are testing each other's powers via the fight, since each is supposed to be dead. As cheesy as the line is, the "you don't know someone until you fight them" is actually what's going on there. Unfortunately what's happened is they're both super-powered and have to delay the apocalypse until part 3, so we're left with the less-than-satisfying (though quite intentionally amusing, I think!) resolution with Neo simply saying, "aw, screw this, I'm outta here" and flying out.

rob geary (rgeary), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 17:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Ned, the difference is that the new Star Wars still suxx no matter how you want to justify it!

rob geary (rgeary), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 17:51 (twenty-two years ago)

They're saying that about the new Matrix movies as well, Rob! Hell, on this thread they're saying it!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 17:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I think Kingfish's quoted bit is funny, but misses the point of the brawl.

It was supposed to be funny?

Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 17:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I meant Internet funny.

rob geary (rgeary), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 17:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, that makes all the difference.

Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 17:57 (twenty-two years ago)

They're saying that about the new Matrix movies as well, Rob! Hell, on this thread they're saying it!

Ha ha, good point Ned. I think even the major detractors from the nu-Matrices will acknowledge that they're trying to do *something*, either with the CG or large-form story or expanding this tenaciously balanced conceit that worked well for one film into five more hours. Even the biggest Star Wars fans have trouble figuring out what the nu-Star Wars films are trying to do beyond shift merchandise.

And I say that as someone who still has a primal reaction to Jedi fights!

rob geary (rgeary), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 17:59 (twenty-two years ago)

The funny thing is that a good slew of these positive arguments remind me of the defense of the recent Star Wars films in ways.

so otm it isn't even funny!

s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:03 (twenty-two years ago)

the difference between the two is that the new Star Wars are more aimed at CHILDREN, and pretty good kids films they are too I reckon.

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:06 (twenty-two years ago)

"I don't wanna be a Jedi!!"

s1utsky (slutsky), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:08 (twenty-two years ago)

the new Star Wars are more aimed at CHILDREN

bah. I call bullshit on this. This is lucas' attempt to dodge or deflect criticism over how his movies finally came out.

Kingfish (Kingfish), Tuesday, 4 November 2003 18:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey steve I'm not going to make it til 7 at the earliest so sadly I can't make the pre-FX drinkies! Unless it's a shot of Jameson. Email me your # and I'll call you in case by some miracle I can make it over there sooner.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 12:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Useful Matrix timeline, although I suppose there might be spoilers if you haven't seen animatrix? (I haven't, and none of the information seemed like spoilers, just nice background.)

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Star Wars was ALWAYS aimed more at children, irrespective of incestuous subplots and plagiarism of Kurosawa. Of course I was annoyed by several things in the prequels but I still enjoyed them very much.

Tracer i have mailed you, am unlikely to get there before 7.15 anyway so see you there.

thanks for that link btw Teeny. i watched bits of Matrix Reloaded again last night and I am still wondering who is that guy who glances forlornly at Neo as he is marched past Merovingien's table in the restaurant as Neo and co approach?

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:14 (twenty-two years ago)

I'll probably be able to make this now, so see you out front at 7:20-ish. Then of course beers afterwards.

I can't give you my number because I haven't got one.

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:18 (twenty-two years ago)

excellent (except for lack of digits)

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Delving into the underground to rescue Neo, Trinity must first battle the Merovingian (Lambert Wilson) and his consort Persephone (Monica Bellucci) in their Eurotrash disco of death. Fans will not be deprived of Trinity's bird kick, Persephone's perfectly spherical breasts, or Merv's snidely villainous "quel bon surprise!"


In short, the movie is something of a bull session until Zion's defenders strap themselves into their galumphing robo-battle machines and begin to rock and roll with the invading mindless metallic insect horde. There's a hint of Burroughsian grandeur to this cyborg-against-cyborg ballet mécanique and, at this point too, my notes began to resemble an undergraduate Burroughs imitation: BX cable squid spaghetti static electricity! Machine-gun machine-hell Armageddon!! Infernal orange and blue orgone-light tentacle vortex!!!

J Hoberman, Village Voice

The J-Hoba is the best film critic alive innit. I want his two recent books. Hardly anywhere stocks em but they all have that poindexter Anthony Lane

Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:21 (twenty-two years ago)

That Tony lane book is holding up remainder bookstores as we speak.

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:22 (twenty-two years ago)

good move watching reloaded last night--I hear this one starts precisely where the last one ended, no recap whatsoever.

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:26 (twenty-two years ago)

The last one ended with Jack Sparrow escaping right?

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:37 (twenty-two years ago)

no it ended by zooming out from Bain's table far enough to reveal that the whole thing is taking place within a goose's mind

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:45 (twenty-two years ago)

It has geese in it? Are they cod philosophising geese or tasty dinner geese?

Ricardo (RickyT), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 13:54 (twenty-two years ago)

oh man I'm reading some of the early reviews and they're awful. I'm talking soon to someone who saw it at a critics' preview; any questions you want me to ask them?

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)

What did they dress up as for Halloween?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 14:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Red or blue pill?

Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 14:29 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't want no spoilers. i read the first sentence of Harry Knowles review and that's enough for me (amazingly, he loved it!)

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 14:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Harry Knowles like this geek-magnet studio-fest, huh? There's a turn-up for the books.

Enrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 14:57 (twenty-two years ago)

if he loves it there's a good chance i will. then again it could just be some kind of cheap trick.

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 15:03 (twenty-two years ago)

By the way, the timeline linked above has some obviously glaring errors - like the fact that it doesn't account for the fact that there actually were five Ones before Neo - which would mean a good few more centuries tacked on. And I think I heard the Reloaded/Revolutions is supposed to be six months after the original, not two years. Not that the difference really matters that much.

Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 17:26 (twenty-two years ago)

like the fact that it doesn't account for the fact

I love my diction! < /sarcasm>

Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 5 November 2003 17:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I just saw it. I liked it, but then again I would.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 17:36 (twenty-two years ago)

coming out of a movie at 9:15am is surreal.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 17:38 (twenty-two years ago)

I know, I go to early morning screenings all the time and actually I find 'em to be kind of a kick.

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 17:47 (twenty-two years ago)

the 'behold: sunlight!' when you exit is k-classic

cinniblount (James Blount), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 17:51 (twenty-two years ago)

raveolution

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 18:21 (twenty-two years ago)

plus, it had the fuck scene with the metal spine holes!

Ludwig Van Kingfish (Kingfish), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 19:40 (twenty-two years ago)

early-morning screenings are especially great when it's a slow-moving or otherwise languorous movie. sipping on a coffee, it's a great way to wake up.

s1utsky (slutsky), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 19:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I saw it too. I liked it. Can we declare a spoiler zone from here on down?

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 21:20 (twenty-two years ago)

fuck it, from whom am I asking permission?

SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********SPOILER ZONE***********

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 21:21 (twenty-two years ago)

there's that other thread, but I don't like that Donald Sutherland pic.

This is now an official SPOILER ZONE!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 21:23 (twenty-two years ago)

oops, sorry, missed the other thread. Just got back, so excited, etc.

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 21:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Fine then spoilinator. T-minus 6 minutes and counting 'til I can leave work, eat this big fat ganja browny, and go see this fucker...later I'll come back and tell Teeny she's OTM.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 21:25 (twenty-two years ago)

discussed it at lunch with coworkers who saw it - I've decided it's a great film and I'm mystified by the reviews.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 21:26 (twenty-two years ago)

dude! nza! I had to come back to work! And I got no brownie!

Okay, I saw that other thread, and boy, I think it was doomed anyway.

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 21:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Seriously, there was less wrong with this movie than the other one. My only (v minor) complaints are that it was a little sappy at parts and the symbolism was a little heavy-handed. I'm really dense about getting symbolism, though, so it was probably gag-worthy to a more perceptive person. and/or perhaps to a christian; I swear there's so much shit that I think is so cool and original and someone lets me in that it's just the story of Cain and Abraham or whatever, I mean I wasn't raised Christian, so step off, mister master race, I probably learned all that shit by playing Vampire anyway.

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 5 November 2003 21:30 (twenty-two years ago)

I believe Geoff L. on Metacritic say it best:

"I'm going to say something about this movie that is my choice to say. Something that I've wanted to say and will say after I say this. Before I say it it is important to understand that I choose and know why I choose to say what I want to say. I believe I know why I choose to say what I am going to say but what matters is why you beleave that you understand why you choose. It is also important that you understand that I do not use the word 'choose,' only the meaning behind the word...the word that does not mean anything to me--except fot the meaning associated with the word. So now I'm going to say it.... Take the above said add in some kick'n FX and two hands full of corn. Mix it all together and bake it with some hype and you'll have enough Matrix Revolutions for 8 - 10 soft headed guests."

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Thursday, 6 November 2003 06:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Well that's the dialogue style down pat. I like the bit where Neo says to Trinity ""I'm going to say something now" AND DOESN'T EVEN SAY IT.

Not as terrible as I thought. Bad enough for me to be laughing all the way through.

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 6 November 2003 10:44 (twenty-two years ago)

i laughed a lot too but not as much as Pete The Cynic. funniest lines of the film:

Oracle: You really are a bastard
Smith: You'd know Mom

Neo: You're gonna have to drive

The majority of the reviews disgust me. This is a hugely entertaining movie as were the last two. As many great lines as bad ones, far more great ideas than bad ones. Strange stilted slow moving first half balanced bravely by exhilirating second half. Best fantasy war scene in cinematic history. Playfully and RIGHTFULLY referencing countless anime and sci-fi of the past. Neo/Smith battle was a bit too drawn out for me but the ending just about saved it. Neo's battle with Bain was far better tho. The new Oracle was better than I expected her to be though not quite matching the previous one. Merovingien and Persephone were under-used/under-exploited perhaps. We find out very quickly who that guy in the restaurant was (aha). Morpheus did bugger all but that's a good thing. The Kid was kinda cute. The Captain's sentinel-slashed face was NOT cute (fucking ew). The CGI for the machines and the APU battle scenes was superb. The dialogue was adequate and true to form. Keanu wasn't THAT bad. Robot insects are the best thing ever. Hugo Weaving is super as ever (you'll say his duplication was pointless because only one of him fought Neo - well, he's a nihilist, get over it). Interesting notions raised (why is it the machines seem to value and honour concepts such as 'trust' and 'trade' more/better than humans? as both the Machine Godhead and The Architect demonstrate)...several annoyances I really can't be bothered raising because I'm too busy thinking about and enjoying all the good stuff (maybe some critics should try that some time).

Neither better or worse than the other two for me. I like them all. A lot.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 11:14 (twenty-two years ago)

I saw Reloaded again a few weeks ago on Imax and it was much better the second time around - although it made the Zion tribal shindig scenes even more ridiculous.

But I don't think even Imax can save Revolutions... I came away not hating it, but bemused. I kept finding myself rolling my eyes at the hokey dialogue. And the leader in machine city made me giggle - he looked like one of those toys made out of pins that you press onto your face.

They should have left it at the first one...

elisabeth k, Thursday, 6 November 2003 11:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Never forget that 'revenger' and 'reporter' begin with the same letter.

Lemmy Caution (Enrique), Thursday, 6 November 2003 11:18 (twenty-two years ago)

why do some people care so much more about the dialogue than the aesthetic quality and execution in other areas?

he looked like one of those toys made out of pins that you press onto your face.

this is a good thing

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 11:27 (twenty-two years ago)

It's irrelevant whether many Smiths or a single Smith fought Neo, because Smith technically won the fight only as one. Had he been about to lose, the others surely would have jumped in. He eventually lost overall (even though he won the fight) because winning meant absorbing Neo, which quite clearly destroyed the Smiths.

Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 6 November 2003 11:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I await Neo's 'Suedehead'

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 6 November 2003 11:53 (twenty-two years ago)

ARF! I'm quite proud of that.

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 6 November 2003 11:57 (twenty-two years ago)

stevem, because clunky/corny dialogue prevents me from getting swept away by the FX/aesthetic. I need both for the whole thing to work.

elisabeth k, Thursday, 6 November 2003 12:16 (twenty-two years ago)

clunky/corny lyrics turn me off a lot of really well produced/arrange/played music, but I seem more determined to not let it bother me with films such as this (because there's much more to it than that, and dismissing a film just because of a few crap lines seems completely deconstructive and OTT to me, much more than with a song)

Smith's war was with his own irrelevance as much as with Neo. he seemed caught between trying to ascertain new meaning to himself and at the same time finding no meaning in anything else. One disappointment was that with Smith rampant within the Matrix we didn't get to really see the consequences of that e.g. thousands of him running around the busy city streets turning everyone in sight into another him. Instead Neo is jacked in by the Machine and straight into the showdown, with Smith apparently having already taken over an entire city and turned it into a stormy stage purely for the purposes of destroying Neo.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 12:22 (twenty-two years ago)

actually it wasn't a disappointment as such - i suppose it would've been an obvious thing to include and in a way it's kinda cool that they just cut to the chase everytime someone went back into the Matrix (as with Morpheus, Trinity and Seraph at the beginning)

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 12:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, but don't you see -- 'The Smiths' being 'destroyed' -- haha, like with Morrissey... who went on to do... 'Suedehead'!!

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 6 November 2003 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Corny dialogue made me laff like a drain. FX left me pretty cold truth be told.

The final agent Smith, Neo fight is very, very reminiscent of the Death Of Superman.

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 6 November 2003 12:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes Yes Enrique. We get your "The Smith's" joke. Very funny. Etc etc.

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 6 November 2003 12:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Okay then -- thanks. Now I can get on. Sheesh.

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 6 November 2003 12:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Corny dialogue made me laff like a drain. FX left me pretty cold truth be told.

it bothers me a bit that people are more influenced and responsive to the former over the latter. i suppose this is natural as we tend to be more sensitive to the aural rather than the visual. i'm not one of these people who champions blockbuster action films all the time because they have 'amazing' effects (incidentally i thought the quality of effects in this film re the machines and the sentinels matched Jurassic Park 3 for projected realism and environmental attachment by and large - maybe not quite WETA standard or even Terminator 3 standard...but the sentinels had an ethereal quality and it's to their advantage that they have no real life precedent unlike the dinosaurs of Jurassic Park perhaps, but still they blended very well with their environment and interacted with it satisfactorily) when they are gimmicky, and in the Matrix films sure there's a LOT of gimmicky stuff but it's good gimmick and often necessary. of course we don't need to see Neo punching Smith in the face close up and in revolving bullet time, but then again, why the fuck not? i don't expect everyone to start doing that in films now though, and i certainly hope they don't.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 12:36 (twenty-two years ago)

So no one else is shocked by the abandonment of all the stuff that made the first two films even remotely interesting (fake philosophy and a sense of style etc) to make a bloated CGI-fest about the Power of Love and Believing in Yourself?

Revolutions was crap. What's fun about watching a zillion stupid-looking flying robots blow up for like seven hours while people (straight-faced) recite insipid cliches and do that war-movie yell? I hate the war-movie yell. AND HOW COME ALL THE KIND OF INTERESTING QUESTIONS FROM THE SECOND ONE GO UNANSWERED? Oh, yeah, Neo's magically in the Matrix... it must be, uh, robot magic. Yeah, Smith copies the hell out of himself. Robot magic. Also the King of the Robots was extra-lame. And oh thanks I really enjoy endless shots of a burned out techno-apocalyptic Robot Cityscape. That's very original.

adam (adam), Thursday, 6 November 2003 13:30 (twenty-two years ago)

maybe you should never listen to any music featuring guitars again either adam

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 13:34 (twenty-two years ago)

there is a quotient of fake philosophy and sense of style in this film - ARE YOU BLIND? the Indian guy's diatribe about love etc. - no less interesting than any of the other concepts bandied around regarding programs in the Matrix and their nature. the film has style in abundance but it was necessary for it to take place mostly in the real world dystopia/Zion so form follows function somewhat there.

What's fun about watching a zillion stupid-looking flying robots blow up for like seven hours while people (straight-faced) recite insipid cliches and do that war-movie yell?

what's NOT fun about that? "i've had sex before but not in THAT position/with THAT person/wearing THOSE things..."

Neo's 'magical' persistence in the Matrix is surely just the next progression of his capabilities - I don't think there's any real need for a specific explanation there.

You make the idea of 'robot magic' sound like a BAD thing? jeez. let's see more cyborg warlocks I say. Science IS magic.

Machine Godhead/Robot King/whatever was fine - what the hell do you want?

Post apocalyptic dystopia is a mainstay of the genre so complaining about it in this film is pretty stupid as well.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 13:40 (twenty-two years ago)

(xpost)

Whine, whine, whine, whine, whine!

Jesus Christ, you people are pissed off because you didn't get what you wanted there to be! Accept that you didn't write the fucking thing and just let them tell you the story as they want to! Most of the things that I've heard people complaining about "not being resolved from Reloaded" were either
a) totally irrelevant, or
b) answered in the story, but not to your satisfaction - which is to say to a completely quibbling and/or literal-and-physically-possible-in-the-real-world level, or
c) answered in the story, but you didn't get it.

Sorry, but that's how it is in my eyes. Some people just couldn't sit down and suspend their disbelief. But really, there are a ton of answers and a lot of resolution - just because not all of it was specifically delineated doesn't mean that you can't figure out the parts that matter. So you either believe that, yes, by him going to the Source in Reloaded, it fundamentally changes his interconnection to the Machines (and thus the Matrix), or you don't. So many people just can't cope with this one - let it go. Smith copies himself because he no longer is taking orders from the Machines and is power hungry. And because he's the complete opposite of Neo. To sum up the whole fight scene: 1 + (-1) = 0

Burned out techno-apocalyptic Robot Cityscape. Hmm. Well, what were you expecting, the city at the bottom of the ocean in The Abyss?

Again, sorry if I'm being kinda pissy myself, but I just don't get what you people wanted (or if you really would have wanted that anyway). It seems that you want a bunch of silly stuff answered (or didn't see the answers that were obviously there for the stuff that was answered), you seem to magically believe that there was no cheese factor/hammy dialogue/wooden delivery in the first one, and you were all psyched for a Zion battle that you expected would somehow transcend the entirety of massive sci-fi battle scenes. I believe I wanted to say something else here, but I'm forgetting it at the moment. I'll get back to you.

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 6 November 2003 13:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Girolamo otm. it's all happening again for me. i had a few bugbears with all three films yet i feel compelled to defend them to the hilt against all this absurd negativity that surrounds them. perspective here - these films still piss on 95% of everything else within the respective genres they affiliate themselves with.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 13:51 (twenty-two years ago)

First of all I'm not down with spending 8 bucks to see a film, major components of which I've seen a million times before and probably done better, that features the very original and interesting idea that Love and Believing Will Make Everything OK. Ugh.

I didn't hear a diatribe about love, just a half-assed gesture toward semiotic bullshit. And Neo's abilities do need an explanation--The Matrix and sequels are positioned as science fiction and I was thrown when they trashed the sf/fantasy background, abandoning self-consistency and internal logic for Robot Magic, as were other people I've talked to. I like SF and I like fantasy and I like chocolate and I like garlic but unless you tip me off right at the start that we're going to be mixing them I'm gonna be pissed off.

King of the Robots spoke with a deep voice with crazy echo. Come on. And postapocalyptic dystopia is less a mainstay than a wretched embarrassing cliche. Why isn't Robot City all clean and happy and well-lit? It's not like they have Robot Bums and Robot Criminals and Robot Cockroaches.

adam (adam), Thursday, 6 November 2003 13:59 (twenty-two years ago)

You are all Matrix apologists!!!

adam (adam), Thursday, 6 November 2003 13:59 (twenty-two years ago)

If Keanu put as much into playing Neo as Hugo Weaving did Agent Smith this would've been one of my favorite film serieses of all time. I wonder if the Neo-going-blind-wearing-blindfold thing was a sneaky way of hiding his lack-of-ability-to-express-emotion when Trinity died?

Was there any question in our minds that the ammo kid was gonna get to do something extraordinary? I'm guessing no.

The funniest moment wasn't in the goofy dialog, but when Neo tried to get out of the train station. Okay, and when Niobe calls dude's ship she's piloting back to Zion "a fat bitch" or whatever.

All in all I'd say it was a really good film, quite engaging and just on this side of the border of too-corny, but not quite what it could have been (and assumed itself to be)...revolutionary.

x-post I'm not an apologist, I agree with Stevem that this tops just about everything of it's 'genre', but I personally am still a little disappointed in the execution. I wonder if, had they not rushed to get these films (Reloaded incl), they might have been something much more exemplary.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 6 November 2003 14:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I ain't apologizing for shit! ;)

The city is clean (I would presume). I don't know if it's happy - neither do you, for that matter. Why should it be well-lit?

BTW, you people all would have hated Return of the Jedi had it been released today, but still remember that despite ROTJ's weaknesses, we still lovably accept it as part of the Holy Trilogy. That was a much weaker film than Revolutions.

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 6 November 2003 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)

we still lovably accept it as part of the Holy Trilogy

I can name a slew of people off the top of my head who will challenge this assertion until the day they die. And some of them post here.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 November 2003 14:05 (twenty-two years ago)

First of all I'm not down with spending 8 bucks to see a film, major components of which I've seen a million times before and probably done better, that features the very original and interesting idea that Love and Believing Will Make Everything OK. Ugh.

in other words you went to see this film because you KNEW you were going to hate it and you wanted to...


I didn't hear a diatribe about love, just a half-assed gesture toward semiotic bullshit. And Neo's abilities do need an explanation--The Matrix and sequels are positioned as science fiction and I was thrown when they trashed the sf/fantasy background, abandoning self-consistency and internal logic for Robot Magic, as were other people I've talked to. I like SF and I like fantasy and I like chocolate and I like garlic but unless you tip me off right at the start that we're going to be mixing them I'm gonna be pissed off.

well i have no problem with SF and fantasy being mixed together like that and I don't need to be warned beforehand.


King of the Robots spoke with a deep voice with crazy echo. Come on.

deep voices with echo never go out of fashion. it's a black jacket.


Why isn't Robot City all clean and happy and well-lit? It's not like they have Robot Bums and Robot Criminals and Robot Cockroaches.

BECAUSE the machines clearly prefer not to spend time and effort cleaning up the skies (or perhaps this was a process underway but not completed yet) when they can cope fine without the Sun and other niceties. nor do they require much light. also it spooks the humans foolish enough to venture out there enough which works to the machines advantage a little.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 14:19 (twenty-two years ago)

nobody complains this much about the SF/fantasy conflicts in anime do they?

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 14:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Ned so OTM I hardly have words.

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 6 November 2003 14:20 (twenty-two years ago)

well it doesn't take that many words to say 'actually some of us always thought Star Wars was pants' but whatever

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 14:24 (twenty-two years ago)

You wanna know what really is lame-looking? The friggin eye of Sauron in the LOTR movies. WTF? That's not even in the book, IIRC, it looks kinda crappy, and it doesn't do anything itself visual exciting except continue to act more flaming than Richard Simmons. Put that in your pipe and smoke it!

And, um, then let me have a hit - God knows I'm tense now.

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 6 November 2003 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Everyone loves tha flaming vagina!

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Are you on crack?

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:10 (twenty-two years ago)

But everyone does love that flamin' vagina. Love as in likes the look of. It is obviously difficult and dangerous to actually physically love a flamin' vagina, and Sauron - wot looks like a flamin' vagina, being a personification (of vaginfication) or pure evil is probably less than loveable.

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Nothing to do with Wayne Coyne? I haven't seen LOTR OR Harry Potter OR Star Wars 5 OR Matrix 2/3.

Enrique (Enrique), Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Will watching The Animatrix make the vampire scene not so WTFish?

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:23 (twenty-two years ago)

are they actually vampires? i thought they were just manipulating the code of the Matrix in order to walk upside down. no there is nothing in the Animatrix about that.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Please, please, PLEASE. Forget about vampires and werewolves - like the Oracle said, they're just stories covering up the exiles doing things they shouldn't be. Yes, Persephone kills one with a silver bullet - but that does mean he is a werewolf, per se. Just means that characteristically, some of the things he does are most easily assimilatable by the system making that story up. I mean, honestly, what use would Merv have for a werewolf in and of itself?

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:48 (twenty-two years ago)

but that does mean he is a werewolf, per se

doesn't mean

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Merv

Who needs Merovingian when you have MERV GRIFFIN!

http://www.brntwdmagazine.com/may-june-2000/merv/Merv.jpg

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.veg.com.au/slicks/ACV020.jpg

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 15:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey, that's what Trinity calls him. :) I thought it was pretty funny myself.

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 6 November 2003 16:23 (twenty-two years ago)

are there any hippies dancing in this one? I wish I'd had a warning of that before I saw Reloaded.

anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:01 (twenty-two years ago)

No hippies, but there is a dance club full of vampire goths for like 45 slow mo seconds.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:02 (twenty-two years ago)

no, there are S&M gothies though in Merv's club. I think it's still Fluke, though.

teeny (teeny), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:02 (twenty-two years ago)

in other words you went to see this film because you KNEW you were going to hate it and you wanted to...

Nah. I did that for Intolerable Cruelty which I kind of liked. I wanted to know what happened to Neo at the end of Reloaded. And I still don't. I have no problem with Vampire Werewolf S&M Robot Programs though.

adam (adam), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Teeny's x-posting scares the shit out of me sometimes.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:22 (twenty-two years ago)

I wanted to know what happened to Neo at the end of Reloaded. And I still don't.

Just because you don't like what you heard doesn't mean you didn't hear it, nonetheless.

Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:23 (twenty-two years ago)

haha nza! we so need to party together dude whoo!

teeny (teeny), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Machine Godhead/Robot King/whatever was fine - what the hell do you want?

http://www.utc.fr/~macret/cine/realisateurs/boorman/photos/zardoz3.jpg

No, really.

Herbstmute (Wintermute), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:34 (twenty-two years ago)

If there's one thing I've learned about this trilogy is that it acts as a sort of a mirror for the viewer; everybody walks out of the theater with exactly what they walked in with.

I've seen hardcore Christians defending it as a Christ story, Buddhists claiming that it showed Neo the true path to enlightenment. Jews have claimed that no, it's an allegory of the Exodus. Hindus, Gnostics, Satanists and Atheists have all claimed that the movies symbolized their own worldview. They got from the movies a look at their own beliefs through another lens.

Likewise, I've seen people who were only looking for an action movie, or who loved pure philosophical discussion. Big Surprise, they walked out of the movie babbling about how awesome the special effects were or how deeply meaningful they found the dialog.

Finally, there are some people who walk into the theater thinking "this movie is never going to live up to the hype, or be nearly as good as (insert movie 'x' here)." Lo and behold, they spend the entire time searching for flimsy plot holes and whining about how there was too much action, or too little action, or too much CGI, or the CGI wasn't used enough, or there wasn't any cool philosophical discussions, or that they spent too much time talking. Meanwhile, they forget to actually watch the movie.

The people in the final group don't even deserve my contempt; their ability to watch a supremely entertaining set of movies and not derive any pleasure from the experience is punishment enough. Some of you fell into this trap for Reloaded; I hope for your own sake that you don't make the same mistake if you haven't seen it yet.

Thanny, Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:39 (twenty-two years ago)

If there's one thing I've learned about this trilogy is that it acts as a sort of a mirror for the viewer; everybody walks out of the theater with exactly what they walked in with.

So long as you're not implying it's only these films in particular that act as a mirror in such cases, you're probably onto something.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:45 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't think that they are exceptional in that regard, although certainly films that do this are in the minority.

Thanny, Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:47 (twenty-two years ago)

so many people wanted to hate this film (even the ones who claim they didn't). i'm so sick of people just deriding these things because they think the CGI is 'lame' (does this make Tron a crap film? wait, don't answer that) or there's 'no story' or other idiotically vague criticisms. it'll happen again with Episode 3 and loads of other films. if the Star Wars films are essentially kids films (and they are really, the adult appeal is just a bonus) then this franchise is more for teenagers. i am much more comfortable with it in that light. it's by no means as 'clever' or sophisticated as Alien or Dune or Blade Runner, not as gung-ho as Aliens, Die Hard, Predator. it opts for the middle ground because that's where it knows it can be the most successful commercially. The Matrix films have grossed more than any of those mentioned above which sort of proves my point. Not that the main motivation here is money, there's still a huge amount of creative invention in the series - new ideas fused with old, but you'll have to look elsewhere for the more cerebral strain of sci-fi. there are films that outstrip the Matrix series in that department for sure, but they don't compete with it for thrills n' spills, that's the compromise the Warchowskis banked on.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 November 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I wonder if this movie will spawn a neck-brace craze amongst club world denizens?

Also, nice to see that even the architect of the Matrix couldn't improve on good ol Technics SL-1200s

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 6 November 2003 20:58 (twenty-two years ago)

OMG DID THIS MOVEI SUK1!1!11! BORNG FIGHTS BAD ACTNG NO ROY JONES HORIBLA HORIBL3 DIALOGUE NOT ENOUGH BLUCI - THIS WAS AWFUL!11! WTF

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I spent the last 2 minutes giggling to myself thinking "What Would Not Donald Sutherland Do?".

That was a good browny.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)

when they entered the club and you saw people dancing dancing dancing to that crazy techno sound you could feel the audience draw its breath in like 'ohdeargod - not another rave scene'

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:05 (twenty-two years ago)

haha I heard a kid a few rows back go "UGH" right then

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)

also, that one puppydog eyed 'golly gee willickers neo - you sure are swell! can I shine your shoes?' guy that apparently couldn't pass for 18 even though he looked 21-22 to me was the fucking ewoks of the series.

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I could've accepted the ewoks if they'd been covered in blood and shooting rounds from their huge mecha-hands.

teeny (teeny), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Roy Jones??

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I mean I wasn't that impressed with the first one, but god it was alot better than the second one - the directors had some sense of how to tell a story, they built up to the over the top actions (lending it some impact), and they understood that vagueness and not filling in the details is the way to go with scifi (ie. showing zion, the council of zion, etc. = showing the old republic, the jedi council, coruscant)(I kept waiting to find out neo had a high midichlorian count). the second was a huge dropoff but had enough of it's own gonzo touches (merv, belluci, all the heebity jeebity mumbo jumbo dormtalk), the third one is just k-meh. fucking awful. talk about ending with a whimper instead of a bang.

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:16 (twenty-two years ago)

dude roy 'best fighter in the world today pound for pound' jones jr. is in the second one! he's also in the devil's advocate apparently ("uncredited") - him and keanu must be tight!

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh yeah that's true!! The directors went through quasi-extras like they were sticks of Fruity Stripe. When we see all the new Zion dudes right at the beginning of Revolutions I was like "who the hell are these guys??" Who cares though I guess, they are pretty interchangeable. Silly humans.

Blount I think you are nostalgic for that feeling that the movie was just a LEETLE cleverer than you. By the second Matrix it was dubious. You either gave it the benefit of the doubt or you didn't. By Revolutions we're five steps ahead and like "hurry up, movie!!!"

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:23 (twenty-two years ago)

no - by my usual logic I should love the third more than the others, I usually hate pretentious action flicks (hated fight club also)(BIG exception - the hulk)(it helps to be on the verge of suicide when you watch the hulk cuz then you're all 'god this movie is sooo true - NOONE WILL EVER LOVE ME')(haha - last week I watched the hulk and listened to 'the killing moon' over and over again) which is odd cuz I looooove pretention! I think it's just that I know all the fanboy geeks are gonna think it's 'deep' or 'provocative' (see every mid to high brow hype piece on the matrix this spring) when those 'aspects' are usually the weakest part of the movie. (except with second - my reaction to the first one: "it was good when noone was talking", my reactio to the second: "it was good when people were talking" (well not 'people' - was anyone rooting for zion? what bores!), my reaction to the third: "the mc escher part was alright")

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 6 November 2003 21:32 (twenty-two years ago)

take occam's razor to this film, and more comes off than the first two. put together.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Thursday, 6 November 2003 23:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I finally saw Revolutions tonight. Better than #2, not as good as #1. Shorter (although long) fight scenes, which helped a lot. Still too much Zion focus--I know it's the whole point, but I don't find it interesting. But
CGI insect robots---please stop doing this. Ugh. So fake, so boring.
Psycho-babble...I don't know, I kind of liked it this time.

But please, someone, please explain what happened at the end? Why did Agent Orange blow up? "Everything that has a beginning has a second and third installment..." If it's above, I didn't see it. I don't understand! //stamping foot and frowning// Have I forgotten something from the first 2 that would explain it? I just didn't get it! Forgive me. But help me!

HATED machine god.

Skottie, Thursday, 6 November 2003 23:20 (twenty-two years ago)

The Hulk was pretentions? Seemed pretty mindless and gratuitous to me. I loved it.

Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 6 November 2003 23:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Why did Agent Orange blow up?

Neo and Agent Smith are opposites. Opposites combined equal zero.

Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 6 November 2003 23:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Okay, I heard all the babble about balancing the equations. Does an equation only balance when you realize that it's balanced? Or do you have to fly around in the air for 10 minutes first? Why don't they blow up sooner?

Skottie, Thursday, 6 November 2003 23:28 (twenty-two years ago)

That wouldn't make for a very exciting film, then, would it?

Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 6 November 2003 23:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Of course you're right, they fly around for 10 minutes to keep my rapt attention at a fever pitch. Whoops.

Seriously, I hear you, and thanks by the way for the explanation, but it still is missing a piece for me. Agent Smith and Neo are missing the equals sign or missing the pressing of the "calculate" key, to make the math work and him blow up. As it is, it's too easy, even by the standards of an action movie.

But I did think it was entertaining. Much more so than #2. (It's a bit of a mistake, I think, to consider 2-3 separate films. And not just given the simultaneous production aspects. There's not a full movie in #2. That's why the fight/chase scenes are so long.)

Skottie, Thursday, 6 November 2003 23:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Didn't it look like Smith only blew up cause the Machine God "helped"? After Smith takes over Neo's body and we're like "oh well, Smith wins, end of movie" we switch back to "real" Neo and the machines are pumping him full of that orange energy juice (Tang, probably). Pip pop bing bang. But if the Machine God had Norton Anti-Virus all along then why the hell did it need Neo? Maybe Neo was the wake-up call. You can take the sys out of the admin, but you can't take the admin out of the sys - you alway have to get your damn users to blast the viruses out AFTER the infection, they never install the damn updates.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 7 November 2003 01:10 (twenty-two years ago)

http://members.arstechnica.com/subscriptors/x/ratstomper/buy_animatrix.jpg

Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 7 November 2003 02:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Hm!

Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 7 November 2003 02:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I <3 Penny Arcade.

Andrew (enneff), Friday, 7 November 2003 02:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I spent the last 2 minutes of the film going "Hmmm, looks like Sydney's Royal Botanical Gardens there"
Eh. Mildly more watchable than the second, but not amazing. Now Return of the Kind is only about a month away though, right? =)

lyra (lyra), Friday, 7 November 2003 04:00 (twenty-two years ago)

That's the best typo ever!

"No more bad folks! The kind are here!" (And yes, less than forty days now...)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 7 November 2003 04:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I saw the second one for about 20 mins on video last night before we lost pateince and put something else on instead. I cannot see how 3 can recover from such an egregiously meretricious plummet in the scripting.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Friday, 7 November 2003 04:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I claim most pretentious and poorly phrased sentence on ILM for 2003.

I haven't seen such a terible Hollywood scything of a good good film in the sequel since the Mad Max series. 'Look at our effects'! And it even went all Superman. And the wooden dialogue, straight off a US TV drama! 'I'm taking you off the case, McGonagal!'. Oh, it was dire. I know I'm talking about the wrong movie btw.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Friday, 7 November 2003 04:12 (twenty-two years ago)

ah, but it went all superman at the end of the first one!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 7 November 2003 04:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I have seen the film a second time now, having carefully paid attention to the questions that have popped up most frequently by those who've seen it. Maybe I'm getting a bit big in me boots, but please ask away and I'll do my best to answer.

Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 7 November 2003 05:58 (twenty-two years ago)

The argument for Hugo Weaving (in which I have no trouble believing, seeing as he is clearly the tragic hero of the story).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 7 November 2003 06:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Philosophy (any philosophy, even faux) reaching an ends = my immediate skepticism.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 7 November 2003 06:44 (twenty-two years ago)

i saw it tonight. i liked one and even two, and i read no reviews of "revolutions" and was not prejudiced against it in any way when i entered the theater, but, after watching it, i felt like it was the worst movie i had ever seen in my life. i am serious. its saddening. i am not gloating, no "HA HA i knew it would suck" from me.

the crowd i watched it with was quite boisterous, and we were all so frustrated by a certain overly-long scene that when it was over, almost everyone in the theater (though not me) began to applaud out of relief. when trinity said "kiss me" about 100 people laughed.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Friday, 7 November 2003 06:47 (twenty-two years ago)

On the other hand, though, the transexuality of one of the brothers W. comes off here much more interestingly than in the first one.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 7 November 2003 06:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Er?

*checks up some random news reports*

Goddamn! Fuck the movies, somebody do a documentary on Larry Wachowski instead.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 7 November 2003 06:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Seriously. I can not believe more people don't know about this.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 7 November 2003 07:01 (twenty-two years ago)

"Here he is, smack in the middle of this dull philosophy lecture, gnawing through the scenery like he’s William Shatner’s illegitimate son. "

Skottie, Friday, 7 November 2003 07:20 (twenty-two years ago)

I heard that he insists people call him Lara.

Nicolars (Nicole), Friday, 7 November 2003 13:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Our Lara could take him.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 7 November 2003 14:13 (twenty-two years ago)

I am afraid to look at this thread in case it has spoilers. Does it? Also, in the fascinating discussion above me, is the general view that the film is good, or is it not good? That's all I want to know. Oh, so I don't have to skim spoilers to find my answer, could you please mark your response FAO me. Thanks, darling.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Friday, 7 November 2003 20:13 (twenty-two years ago)

most people seem to think it is terrible. and it IS kinda, but i'll stick up for it because i enjoyed it a lot and think there are quite a few great things about it.

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 8 November 2003 02:11 (twenty-two years ago)

My thoughts:

1) They should never have got the Levellers to design the outfits for the hippies of Zion.
2) The hippies annoyed me, they were no rebel alliance, and I thought the 4 hour battle scene was a bit boring.
3) Meatloaf should have been a member of the ruling council of Zion, this would have improved the film 100%
4) The characters didn't crack any jokes, the only funny dude was Agent Smith. I mean, it's not human to be serious every second of the day. Yeah, I know they were fighting for their lives, but still ya know humour could be a good motivator.
5) I am not looking forward to Matrix: Resurrections. Which surely must follow.
6) It was still better than Matrix: Reloaded.

jel -- (jel), Saturday, 8 November 2003 11:04 (twenty-two years ago)

maybe holey jumpers are the height of post-apocalyptic chic

jel dude, that '4 hour' battle scene is kinda how i envisage the Transformers movie to be like!

The characters didn't crack any jokes

one of the Hammer (or was it Logos) crew did, can't remember what he said tho.

stevem (blueski), Saturday, 8 November 2003 13:18 (twenty-two years ago)

"please hammer don't hurt em my ass"

cinniblount (James Blount), Saturday, 8 November 2003 19:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I suppose that it comes down to the fact that I prefer ham to corn :)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 8 November 2003 20:14 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought it was absolute pants! Absolute pants mixed with a heavy dose of (bad)
http://www.scificollector.stamp-centre.co.uk/scifishop/reddwarf/images/reddwarfmousemat.jpg

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Sunday, 9 November 2003 00:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Also, the end shot was the worst shot in any film ever (sorry, stevem! :( ) - I actually felt sick looking at how fake it was (and I love artifice! -)

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Sunday, 9 November 2003 00:44 (twenty-two years ago)

And don't tell me there's no such thing as bad Red Dwarf, either!

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Sunday, 9 November 2003 00:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Red Dwarf became very bad, but i watched large chunks of Revolutions again via the gift of DivX earlier, and i still think it's fine - thought the final scene was okay, kinda expected (tho not with those characters). there are just too many cool things about the film to deride it as trash completely. all 'Neo and Trinity' scenes pretty much sucked granted, but other than that it's still good it's still good.

stevem (blueski), Sunday, 9 November 2003 01:34 (twenty-two years ago)

actually the scene where they float above the clouds was probably the closest to evoking the feeling I'd hoped the ending would've.

cinniblount (James Blount), Sunday, 9 November 2003 01:37 (twenty-two years ago)

It may not be the best film of the year, but certainly the most critically underrated.

Girolamo Savonarola, Sunday, 9 November 2003 01:50 (twenty-two years ago)

no way - Good Boy!

cinniblount (James Blount), Sunday, 9 November 2003 01:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Underrated, not badly rated.

Girolamo Savonarola, Sunday, 9 November 2003 01:54 (twenty-two years ago)

um, matrix 3 got worse reviews than good boy! (understandable, since it's nowhere near as good as good boy!)

cinniblount (James Blount), Sunday, 9 November 2003 02:00 (twenty-two years ago)

omg this movie was so lame. its not even good on mushrooms. AND i was at the imax. sheesh.

Pablo Cruise (chaki), Sunday, 9 November 2003 02:07 (twenty-two years ago)

yay lotr!

cinniblount (James Blount), Sunday, 9 November 2003 02:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I count the days. :-)

i watched large chunks of Revolutions again via the gift of DivX earlier

*gasp* Stevem you vicious pirate. They went to ALL THAT TROUBLE to trumpet the worldwide at-the-same-minute release to beat those darned Internet users and their file-sharing and look what you do.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 9 November 2003 03:24 (twenty-two years ago)

stevem's disregard for international copyright law and information ownership is frankly galling. He should be released into the forest and hunted down by Time Warner bigwigs on horseback, then burned and fed to children.

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Sunday, 9 November 2003 05:16 (twenty-two years ago)

(psyche!)

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Sunday, 9 November 2003 05:16 (twenty-two years ago)

There were several fanstastic shots, like the one in profile when Annoying Kid is pushing the ammo in a cart along the walkway to R.Lee Mifune who's standing in the middle of a storm of Sentinels. And the sequence when the stream of Sentinels through the

I am looking forward to someone in December pointing out that Return of the King's plot rips off Revolutions bigtime.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 9 November 2003 22:08 (twenty-two years ago)

(end of first paragraph =) stream of sentinels through the hole in the roof becomes a river.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Sunday, 9 November 2003 22:10 (twenty-two years ago)

stevem's disregard for international copyright law and information ownership is frankly galling

hey! i downloaded it, i didn't upload it/pirate it myself. and this was after paying to see it anyway. you varmints.

i still think this film is one succulent sausage of an entertaining picture show. i have just eaten some sausages.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 10 November 2003 10:36 (twenty-two years ago)

my 2p: it managed to be more boring but more spectactular than 2nd. a lot of cool looking scenes and set pieces ripped from manga and anime strung together rather haphazardly with no real thought. dialog often unbearable

Alan (Alan), Monday, 10 November 2003 11:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Okay, I heard all the babble about balancing the equations. Does an equation only balance when you realize that it's balanced? Or do you have to fly around in the air for 10 minutes first? Why don't they blow up sooner?

Well obviously the equations can only be balanced because Agent Smith tried to absorb Neo? Or something? I dunno, I had no idea that's what happened until I read this thread, and now it makes A LOT MORE SENSE than it did after we watched it this weekend.

I kind of thought it sucked; the Trinity death scene was painful and it basically turned the whole thing into the most drawn out Christ-metaphor ever; Tom was like haha 9 hour version of Tron! HOWEVER the entire ending is totally saved by the really horrible slow-mo shot of Neo punching Agent Smith in the face!!! Every movie needs that shot from now on!! I cannot think of one movie ever at all that wouldn't be improved by super slow-mo punching.

My main problem with the whole series--which I actually totally love, the first movie is great--is that I just don't get why anyone would want to leave the Matrix anyway; judging by Zion and Robot City the real world is for shit.

My favorite character: the guy who kept saying "He's out of his goddamn mind!" Dude was the only person in the movie who talked a bit of sense.

Allyzay, Monday, 10 November 2003 15:52 (twenty-two years ago)

By "it" up on the painful Christ metaphor sentence, I meant Revolutions turned it into a painful metaphor, not Trinity's death. That was just painful, not metaphoric.

ALSO: I really do not need to see Keanu Reeves getting his eyes burnt out!! That's totally unnecessary!!

Allyzay, Monday, 10 November 2003 15:53 (twenty-two years ago)

he made it work for him fashion-wise though!

teeny (teeny), Monday, 10 November 2003 15:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm starting to think that the trilogy actually has a really-poorly-explicated circular plot. Remember how in the first one Agent Smith tells Neo (or Morpheus, can't remember) "well, we TRIED a totally perfect version of the Matrix but you humans just wouldn't accept it." Well that's what we've got now. Earth is still completely fucked, Zion is ruined, spoon-benders are still the only ones who will have the self-consciousness and/or bravery to want out of the Matrix. But little kitty cats don't have to sleep in the rain anymore! It's sunny all the time now! But hey geniuses, without rain HOW WILL THE FLOWERS GROW??

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 10 November 2003 15:56 (twenty-two years ago)

They're *in* the computer?

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 10 November 2003 15:57 (twenty-two years ago)

why anyone would want to leave the Matrix anyway

some people just can't handle the fact they got beat down by some smartass robots. i think if it was me, and i think i know me tho i can't be sure, i would like to live my life as much on the 'outside' and as close to the truth as possible. it was only Matrix v1.0 which was supposedly the real deal utopia where nothing fucked up but apparently we puny fleshlings just can't deal with that.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 10 November 2003 15:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Errrgh, no, it's unnecessary. I was much happier when he reentered the Matrix and his eyes grew back. See: further proof that the Matrix is better than this so-called for-shit real world that Morpheus is so enamored with.

The Matrix is better in all ways possible:
1) Super kung fu skills for no apparent reason
2) Flying!
3) Everyone wears either leather, rubber, or crazy goth Maoist costumes all the time (contrast this with the horrifying dumpsterhippie chic sported by everyone in Zion)
4) Choices of food besides plain oatmeal
5) Sunlight
6) Distinct lack of people who wander around talking like drunk third year philosophy majors.

I would commit suicide if I was stuck in Zion.

xpost: Tracer Hand, computer flowers. DON'T. NEED. WATER!!!

Allyzay, Monday, 10 November 2003 16:00 (twenty-two years ago)

what if it had been like Monsters Inc and the machines thought they got more power out of humans by triggering the most horrific and torturous images in their brains virtually. only for Neo to come along and show them that they get twice the power by treating us all to mental pictures of kittens with glowsticks and whatnot

stevem (blueski), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)

The only "drawback" to the Matrix is Agent Smith and really I don't know if he's so much a "drawback" being the best character in the series and all.

Well, that and the whole "being a slave to robots who are sucking your life force" thing but I think I wouldn't mind that soooo much. If I had to choose between listening to Morpheus, who is clearly completely fucked in his head, and being a robot battery, I think I'd choose robot battery to be honest. Morpheus just sounds like my crazy ex boyfriend and it wasn't amusing when he talked like that either :/

xpost stevem that idea rules!!!!!!!!!

Allyzay, Monday, 10 November 2003 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)

the new ilx server runs on kittens with glowsticks.

teeny (teeny), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:03 (twenty-two years ago)

that's why everyone's happy now.

teeny (teeny), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Zion has APUs to play with, the Matrix don't. no contest.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:04 (twenty-two years ago)

FYI I enjoyed the film while I was watching it and I'd see it again! I just don't think it was a very good film and I thought the ending was for shit though I like it better having read that equation-balancing explanation which was kind of obvious in retrospect but at the time I was just like, "This is so gay."

Allyzay, Monday, 10 November 2003 16:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Zion v the Matrix is the film equivalent of the hippies v goths thread.

Allyzay, Monday, 10 November 2003 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I think I'd choose robot battery to be honest

"damn you rock'em and sock'em robots, can't we just get along?!"

stevem (blueski), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)

heheh steve you're totally right as well that the sentinels missed a trick by not having humans strapped right onto their exoskeletons: portable battery packs! The battery-humans could even make strangulated R2D2-noises during the battle sequences, how cute would that be!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:06 (twenty-two years ago)

or the hell with it, deduce that the most energy humans extrapolate is during sex and turn it into The Matrix Orgython

stevem (blueski), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:10 (twenty-two years ago)

I call dibs on the neck brace!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:12 (twenty-two years ago)

something else that bugged me: why didn't the Smiths take out Seraph and the lil girl when they had the chance?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Maybe she defeated them with a rainbow that shot bullets! of PURE LOVE.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:14 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.glutino.com/images_recipe/25.jpg

TOMBOT, Monday, 10 November 2003 16:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Was anyone else disappointed that the only implications of Agent Smith entering the real world = Neo's eye booboo? I thought that shit was gonna be like MAD HYSTERIA or something.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:57 (twenty-two years ago)

yeh exactly. Bain was pretty cool and was under-used - i'm amazed this film wasn't three hours long either given the amount of stuff they had to try and cover (no wonder it came off half-cock)

stevem (blueski), Monday, 10 November 2003 17:06 (twenty-two years ago)

The robots are illogical, why do they bother replicating themselves?

jel -- (jel), Monday, 10 November 2003 17:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I loved it!

rob geary (rgeary), Monday, 10 November 2003 17:52 (twenty-two years ago)

stevem- I think the implication is that seraph is one of those bizarrely powerful semi-relic programs like the merovingian. doesn't smith say something like "i've been trying to kill you forever" or some variant? presumably he busted out mad skillz. i think there are also implications that the little girl is some kind of neo-equivalent, a program who is escaping the matrix and comes with some powers. maybe

rob geary (rgeary), Monday, 10 November 2003 17:54 (twenty-two years ago)

i loved the blinding! there's no reason not to start wrecking your characters when it's the end. plus obvious symbolism, tiresias etc etc

rob geary (rgeary), Monday, 10 November 2003 17:55 (twenty-two years ago)

My favorite character: the guy who kept saying "He's out of his goddamn mind!" Dude was the only person in the movie who talked a bit of sense
ha ha! that guy was the best. "i should have beat it out of him." he was totally speaking for the audience. all the freedom fighters are obviously lunatic zealots who can't even agree on the best plans.

rob geary (rgeary), Monday, 10 November 2003 17:56 (twenty-two years ago)

The robots are illogical, why do they bother replicating themselves?

same reasons humans do - as the narrator says in The Second Renaissance 'man made machine in his image'

the little girl was the new Oracle i thought - but the old Oracle came back when the Architect/Machine God did an undo on all SMith's meddling anyway.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 10 November 2003 18:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Second Renaissance? Are you following the talking bits or something? ;)

jel -- (jel), Monday, 10 November 2003 18:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Tracer, you're thinking of They Might Be Giants, not the Matrix.

Allyzay, Monday, 10 November 2003 18:17 (twenty-two years ago)

I built a little empire out of some crazy garbage
Called the blood of the exploited working class
But they've overcome their shyness
Now they're calling me Your Highness
And a world screams, "Kiss me, Son of God"

I destroyed a bond of friendship and respect
Between the only people left who'd even look me in the eye
Now I laugh and make a fortune
Off the same ones that I tortured
And a world screams, "Kiss me, Son of God"

I look like Jesus, so they say
But Mr. Jesus is very far away
Now you're the only one here who can tell me if it's true
That you love me and I love me

I built a little empire out of some crazy garbage
Called the blood of the exploited working class
But they've overcome their shyness
Now they're calling me Your Highness
And a world screams, "Kiss me, Son of God"
Yes a world screams, "Kiss me, Son of God"

TOMBOT, Monday, 10 November 2003 18:21 (twenty-two years ago)

And you stare at me
In your Jesus Christ pose
Arms held out
Like you've been carrying a load
And you swear to me
You don't want to be my slave

But you're staring at me
Like I need to be saved
In your Jesus Christ pose
Arms held out
In your Jesus Christ pose
Thorns and shroud
Like it's the coming of the Lord
And I swear to you
That I would never feed you pain

But your staring at me
Like I'm driving the nails
In your Jesus Christ pose
And you stare at me
In your Jesus Christ pose
Arms held out like it's
The coming of the Lord

And would it pay you more to walk on water
Then to wear a crown of thorns
It wouldn't pain me more to bury you rich
Then to bury you poor
In your Jesus Christ pose

Allyzay, Monday, 10 November 2003 18:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Particle man, particle man
Doing the things a particle can
What's he like? It's not important
Particle man

Is he a dot, or is he a speck?
When he's underwater does he get wet?
Or does the water get him instead?
Nobody knows, Particle man

Triangle man, Triangle man
Triangle man hates particle man
They have a fight, Triangle wins
Triangle man

Universe man, Universe man
Size of the entire universe man
Usually kind to smaller man
Universe man

He's got a watch with a minute hand,
Millenium hand and an eon hand
When they meet it's a happy land
Powerful man, universe man

Person man, person man
Hit on the head with a frying pan
Lives his life in a garbage can
Person man

Is he depressed or is he a mess?
Does he feel totally worthless?
Who came up with person man?
Degraded man, person man

Triangle man, triangle man
Triangle man hates person man
They have a fight, triangle wins
Triangle man

TOMBOT, Monday, 10 November 2003 18:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Hahaha dude, this one time we had to do a "found art video" about a piece of poetry (!!! I have no idea what this means!!!) and so we chose that song and just drew a picture of what we decided these "men" looked like (uh, they look like a dot, a globe, and a triangle in case anyone couldn't figure that out) and filmed it. Just like three screens of this, plus the song in the background. SOMEHOW THIS GOT AN A+!!!!!!!!!! I also did this to Born in the USA when we were asked to do a very similar project for another class but that's another story, a story involving the question "Why the fuck was this such a popular assignment at Rhodes Jr. High?"

I kind of think the ends of both of these short "found art videos" were better than the ending of Matrix Revolutions though :/

Allyzay, Monday, 10 November 2003 18:30 (twenty-two years ago)

SHIT person man!! I forgot to explain person man!! Person man was a stick figure with my friend Josh's head glued to it. A photo of his head, I mean. That's probably why we got that A, in retrospect.

Allyzay, Monday, 10 November 2003 18:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Hm.

The final battle in the skies is like Superman II (1980), only nowhere near as fun.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 10 November 2003 21:12 (twenty-two years ago)

http://members.arstechnica.com/subscriptors/x/ratstomper/funnypost.jpg

Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 10 November 2003 21:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I fear!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 10 November 2003 21:43 (twenty-two years ago)

http://static.sky.com/images/pictures/1145502.jpg

NA (Nick A.), Monday, 10 November 2003 21:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Just loved the graphic (as found on another board's Revolutions thread) and had to post it.

Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 10 November 2003 21:51 (twenty-two years ago)

It is pretty great. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 10 November 2003 21:53 (twenty-two years ago)

three weeks pass...
Having finally seen this movie, I have come to the conclusion that I am better at noticing details in movies than most people, because I keep thinking that anyone who still had questions as to what was going on by the end of it really wasn't paying attention.

- The Smiths did take out Seraph and Sati; the Smith who confronted The Oracle in her apartment was the Smithized Sati, much like the Smith who confronted Neo was the Smithized Oracle.

- The robots intentionally grimmed up the atmosphere to make life inimical to the free humans. This was mentioned in the first movie, IIRC.

- The rules defining the Matrix are different now; anyone who wants to leave and go to Zion can do so; the people in the Matrix are being given the choice. Likewise, the programs with "no purpose" which would normally have been deleted, like Sati, are now free to exist within the Matrix.

- The end of the Neo/Smith fight: Neo lets himself get absorbed by the Smiths. Neo is jacked into the Matrix via the Source of the robot city. As soon as he gets absorbed, the robot city sends a gigantic fuck-off power surge through his body. NeoSmith blows up. However, NeoSmith is also insanely fuckoff powerful and takes all of the Smiths with him (most likely due to the "opposites attract"/"balance the equation" thing, with an allusion to the symmetry of Neo creates/Smith destroys shown back in the first movie). All of the programs infected by Smith are freed, presumably along with all of the people.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 1 December 2003 16:43 (twenty-two years ago)

but why is Sati lying on the sidewalk when Smithworld is undone? if she had been Smithed she would not be there at all no?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 1 December 2003 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)

also what are the machines doing with Neo's body at the end? it looked like he was being revived, perhaps just as a program?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 1 December 2003 17:00 (twenty-two years ago)

but why is Sati lying on the sidewalk when Smithworld is undone?

Why was the Oracle lying in the pit at the end of the Smith explosion? Becasue the Smith infection had been driven from her.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 1 December 2003 17:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Also, is it particularly important what the machines were going to do with Neo's body at the end?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 1 December 2003 17:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Why was the Oracle lying in the pit at the end of the Smith explosion? Becasue the Smith infection had been driven from her.

woah i hadn't even noticed this and i watched chunks of it last night (divx download)!

Also, is it particularly important what the machines were going to do with Neo's body at the end?

potentially yes

stevem (blueski), Monday, 1 December 2003 17:05 (twenty-two years ago)

It's the Christ/Arthur/god-knows-what-else motif of the body of the legendary figure being taken away to a mysterious and unknown place, where he is kept from the brink of death until he rises again (also alluded to in the Oracle saying that they'd see Neo again some time).

Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 1 December 2003 17:39 (twenty-two years ago)

yeh, she 'suspected so' - but what of the hero Smith?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 1 December 2003 17:55 (twenty-two years ago)

The films are not meant to be hermetic.

Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 1 December 2003 18:03 (twenty-two years ago)

- The robots intentionally grimmed up the atmosphere to make life inimical to the free humans. This was mentioned in the first movie, IIRC.

I thought it was the other way around - the human scientists caused the permanent could to destroy the solar energy of the computers.

I can't remember enough, but I think the only recognizable things we see after the Smithplosion are programs - it's not entirely clear that there are any humans left ("there are levels of survival that we are comfortable with").

I'm basically bitter about the whole thing because I feel complicit - I did a lot of cheerleading of the "it's only half a movie" sort after Reloaded, and in fact I got bad bad warmovie instead.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 1 December 2003 18:04 (twenty-two years ago)

the machines maintained the damage the humans did to the Earth/sky as it didn't affect them too much

it seems that only programs can be retrieved after Smithery and not humans in the Matrix.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 1 December 2003 18:12 (twenty-two years ago)

It did affect them. That is when they came up with the whole podded human living out life in matrix thing.

bnw (bnw), Monday, 1 December 2003 18:15 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm probably missing something glaringly obvious but when an agent takes over a human that means that human is gone in the Matrix, but are still alive in their pod? can they be placed back in the Matrix if an agent is occupying their space? what about Smith, no longer an agent?

stevem (blueski), Monday, 1 December 2003 18:18 (twenty-two years ago)

It was clear from the first one during the "Dodge this" scene that Agents temporarily take over a representation of a body in the Matrix. They're essentially commandeering a body and putting its consciousness on pause. So if an Agent takes over a person in the Matrix and the Agent is "killed", then they become the original body again, only that the original person is dead.

I would assume that Smith found a way to permanently control multiple bodies, but that he was simply removed from the system w/o killing everyone. Doesn't make much sense to have that big city at the end with everyone dead in it.

Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 1 December 2003 18:22 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm probably missing something glaringly obvious but when an agent takes over a human that means that human is gone in the Matrix, but are still alive in their pod?

I don't think this was ever explained. As was why Neo and his cronies had no trouble offing a ton of guards and cops, therefore killing a bunch of enslaved humans. (I think I have reached my maximum level of geeking out.)

bnw (bnw), Monday, 1 December 2003 18:31 (twenty-two years ago)

As was why Neo and his cronies had no trouble offing a ton of guards and cops, therefore killing a bunch of enslaved humans.

I read an article (NYTimes, I think), that likened their mindset regarding the killing of innocent enslaved humans to that of terrorists.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 1 December 2003 19:11 (twenty-two years ago)

They were certainly very fundamentalist in their views in the same way that extreme groups are cast in the media ("If you are not with us, you are against us").

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 1 December 2003 19:26 (twenty-two years ago)

one month passes...
Saw this at the weekend at the Imax. Nice 3D trailer in advance.

As for the film...

1) Was giggling at the end. Thought I got it. Explained to mate what my theory was. He looked perplexed. Realised that any film where i have to decide whether it was good or awful isn't actually that good.

2) I reckon this was a bit of an Apocalypse Now for the brothers W. There's a great story in Reloaded and revolutions - How neo does some shit to save Zion. You could ice a lot of the rest for director's Acid Cut on DVD and still be left with a 2 hr 30 minute film that kicked major league ass. For starters, the chase seen from 2 and the battle scenes from 3 are magnificent. They should have done what they did first time - realise that kung-fu. intelligent cgi, chicks in pvc with guns and cod-philosophy make a decent movie. Instead, they gone all Lucas and actually start to believe this shite and take it seriously with equally poor results.

3) I realised that what i like about 1 was the aesthetic of the matrix; it had a similar 'any city' feel to it like 'Se7en' but had this really cool dislocated timeframe through the TV screens being 1950s stylee, offices being late 80s etc. That was all left behind as all scenes in the Matrix became darkened and night-set, especially in 3.

4) At the start of 3, we're told that Merv is a kick-ass dude. Yet he promptly disappears from the film. How does he stop the Architect getting him? Does Smith get him? What / who is he? Help!

5) Ditto Oracle. She was dead. Then she's not. What's going on? Help. Please.

6) What happened in the end? Was the machine god the architect?

Some films use ambiguity well; but they combine the ambiguity to certain key moments which determine the discussion of the film and its reception by the audience. This film wasn't ambiguous; it was fucking incomprehensible. It wasn't art-house. it was a major blockbusting big-budget kick-ass movie. I shouldn't leave a film with so many questions about what actually happened before my eyes. I want to ponder the implications of what's happened, not wonder what on earth just happened before my eyes. I'm still wondering.

Dave B (daveb), Monday, 12 January 2004 01:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I am of the 'big clumsy robot fighting is boring as fuck' school and thought this was a really bafflingly shit film, though I really liked the scene where they briefly go above the clouds and see the sky. If Trinity hadn't gone 'BEAUTIFUL!' and ruined the atmosphere it'd've been better.

Ferrrrrrg (Ferg), Monday, 12 January 2004 01:54 (twenty-one years ago)

dave, Merv is a rebel program who acquires and uses assets in order to remain out of The Architect/Machine God's control - those assets being information and pawns/treasures such as Neo. we don't know what happens to him but it doesn't really matter.

The Oracle was Smithed but returned to her previous state when A/MG reversed Smith's meddling of the Matrix.

Architect is the manifestation of the Machine God within The Matrix only, so they seem to be one and the same thing.

as time goes by even the most ardently naive defenders of this kind of stuff think of 1000 ways it could've been better. we definitely need a new franchise that combines action with intelligent, non-cliched sci-fi ideologies - 35% Matrix, 65% K Dick/Herbert/M Banks/Gibson...you can now do absolutely anything with special effects technology so with the novelty of that wearing off it would be great to see more cerebral, adult-orientated (not meaning violence or sex particularly) plots and concepts executed with more artistic integrity - again The Animatrix does hint at this with marvellous glimpses in 'Beyond' and 'Matriculated' especially.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 12 January 2004 11:45 (twenty-one years ago)

But it has Belluci's perfect breasts.

Leee Majors (Leee), Monday, 12 January 2004 19:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Leee OTM.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 12 January 2004 20:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Finally saw this at the budget tonight. Since I was expecting it to completely suck, I was very pleasantly surprised that it was a perfectly decent movie with similar strengths and weaknesses to the last one.

However, no one on this thread mentioned the bit in the initial pan across the goth club where one of the dancers pulls his dance partner's breasts out of her corset by the nipples, WTF?!

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 19 January 2004 04:06 (twenty-one years ago)

two years pass...
i'm probably overstating things just a little bit, but this is quite possibly the worst film i have ever seen

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:00 (nineteen years ago)

so fucking rough.

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:02 (nineteen years ago)

i mean... the second one is pretty abominable too. could that be worse?

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:02 (nineteen years ago)

no way, it had the car chase and more belluci

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:03 (nineteen years ago)

and an exploding cyber-vagina

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:04 (nineteen years ago)

i hated the second one so much i waited until last night to finally check this out. i have never seen a film that i wished i hadn't seen more than this one.

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:05 (nineteen years ago)

which one had the rave?

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:06 (nineteen years ago)

The second one.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:06 (nineteen years ago)

boring, loud, obnoxious, anticlimactic. i read a review that called it "a whimper disguised as a bang", that was pretty OTM but not harsh enough. also: that line towards the end where "the oracle" says, 'i don't think we've seen the last of neo' made me want to break my TV.

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:07 (nineteen years ago)

ALL 3 MOVIES SUCK. THESE GUYS CANT MAKE MOVIES FOR SHIT. BOUND WAS HORRIBLE TOO. V FOR VENDETTA LOOKS LIKE A STINKER. IF ITS GOOD ILL EAT MY HAT.

chaki (chaki), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:09 (nineteen years ago)

i think i'm going to sell my dvd of the first 'matrix' now. and there's no way in hell i'm going to see 'v for vendetta' now. fuck these guys.

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:11 (nineteen years ago)

i was planning to watch it again in a few hours after finally buying the DVD.

i will probably agree more with gear than myself two years ago...

Konal Doddz (blueski), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:15 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, this is truly the worst movie ever. Even the fight scenes suck - oooh, look here's Neo facing off against a million evil guys... but who cares, since we know they don't really die or mean anything, and we know that Neo can't die. Real martial arts action movie are bad enough, this was unbearable.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:19 (nineteen years ago)

you know, I agree with Chaki. However, I've never seen any of the Matrix movies, because I saw "Bound" first and it was SO FUCKING BAD.

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:21 (nineteen years ago)

i'm really mad at myself for watching this. i should have rented 'domino' instead.

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:30 (nineteen years ago)

I like the second two more and more as we move further away from the knee-jerk hype-panning that characterized the criticism around the time of their respective releases. The first Matrix was so self-contained and essentially didn't need a sequel. The second two are overly self-referential (and didn't provide any more pop-post-modern illumination via Baudrillard), but I'm beginning to see more in them as time goes on.

i'm from hollywood, Saturday, 11 March 2006 00:49 (nineteen years ago)

you would think that, though.

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 01:26 (nineteen years ago)

i liked bound! and i still (probably) like the first one, it had some neat movie ideas. that were not exploited at all in 2 and 3 mind.

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 11 March 2006 01:55 (nineteen years ago)

considering the first film had action scenes that were pretty tight in editing and relatively economical, it was amazing how bludgeoning the next two films were, style-wise

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 01:59 (nineteen years ago)

totally! and stuff like escaping thru the telephone, neat cinematic stuff like that, is not even used in the sequels

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:00 (nineteen years ago)

yeah this movie's pretty dire

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:38 (nineteen years ago)

i just remember the subplot with the crusty old general and that kid who took over his walker-robot thing and then shot open the gate and said, "believe..."

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:40 (nineteen years ago)

yeah! my god, and one of the cheesiest "council of elders" or whatever in a sci-fi movie ever

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:44 (nineteen years ago)

i guess we're supposed to believe in neo half-assing it and selling out humanity for some michael collins-esque "pax machina"

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:46 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, a truce with colonel sanders ain't no truce at all if you ask me

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:47 (nineteen years ago)

which reminds me, why wasn't there a tie-in with KFC for this movie?

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:48 (nineteen years ago)

KFC declined in favor of the equilibrium account

gear (gear), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:50 (nineteen years ago)

matrix 4: protocols of the elders of zion

latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 11 March 2006 04:09 (nineteen years ago)

I didn't consider him "Colonel Sanders" so much as "Not Donald Sutherland"

also, best description of the elders group goes to a friend who called them "Dreadlocked Starfleet Command"

kingfish da notorious teletabby (kingfish 2.0), Saturday, 11 March 2006 08:13 (nineteen years ago)

i still really like Reloaded a lot

Konal Doddz (blueski), Saturday, 11 March 2006 10:40 (nineteen years ago)

Reloaded had some good elements to it, but I recall that most of the plot stuff I had a "It'll be explained in the last one, you'll see" attitude to. And of course it wasn't. At some point I'll watch Reloaded to see whether it can be salvaged. I really really don't think I'll be sitting through Revolutions again.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 11 March 2006 13:24 (nineteen years ago)

I haven't seen 2 or 3

why aren't they called 2 and 3, though? stupid names

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 11 March 2006 13:38 (nineteen years ago)

reloaded is the only one worth watching. so over the top, so ridiculous.

senseiDancer (sexyDancer), Saturday, 11 March 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)

why aren't they called 2 and 3, though? stupid names

oh it doesn't matter.

Konal Doddz (blueski), Saturday, 11 March 2006 15:08 (nineteen years ago)

isn't 2 just our heroes going from one long-winded bore to another?

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 11 March 2006 15:13 (nineteen years ago)

if blade trinity were called blade 3 I might want to see it and blade 2

I would like die hard: with a vengeance more if it were called die hard 3: die hard with a vengeance or something

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 11 March 2006 15:28 (nineteen years ago)

i won't see a sequel unless it's using Roman numerals

Konal Doddz (blueski), Saturday, 11 March 2006 15:33 (nineteen years ago)

altho i'd wish they'd get a move on with the prequels to Phase IV

Konal Doddz (blueski), Saturday, 11 March 2006 15:34 (nineteen years ago)

rocky VI?

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 11 March 2006 15:36 (nineteen years ago)

i fell asleep halfway through the second one, woke up at the end, felt no need to ever rent it or see it again to fill in the holes. nice bellucci though.

kyle (akmonday), Saturday, 11 March 2006 15:48 (nineteen years ago)

I saw this film when it came out. It was probably worth it for the 10 seconds of hott BDSM goths - but that was the best thing about it.

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Saturday, 11 March 2006 17:20 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

Finally saw this last night. I liked the 2nd one though toward the end it got confusing as I don't think I was invested enough in the storyline. This was just boring, like the dull space battles from the new Star Wars but stretched out to an hour and inter-cut with stuff that was in the other movies. Perhaps the plot of this movie isn't as confusing as it seems to me, but it felt like every time a major character was going to drop a plot bomb they went into cliche Matrix-talk. "What do I need to do?" "You know, you've always known." This isn't philosophical, it's bad writing.

Also, yeah, the guy with the attitude that likes to cuts himself, let's leave him in the same room with a disabled Neo, and have him watched over by one doctor lady. Also let's get the Master Control Program from Tron except make him look like a baby. How come Neo can't bring Trinity back from the dead again, if Neo got taken over by Smith in the first movie would the world have ended like it does here, and what were all the mechs doing in that inter-dimensional vortex from the end of Howard the Duck?

Only reason to see this film are those amazing breasts.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 8 December 2008 19:52 (seventeen years ago)

ugh, this movie. you know what sucked about this too is that the "real world" which is masked by the matrix is boring and ugly. i would rather have had a couple more movies completely within the matrix program, with neo and the rest kind of working undercover like a viral program, instead of this leather fetish rave fighting bullshit. and considering how "smart" this movies were supposed to be, the last two are so, so stupid.

i did see v for vendetta in the end, it was good, i suppose.

speed racer was better than revolutions, btw.

omar little, Monday, 8 December 2008 20:01 (seventeen years ago)

ugh, this movie. you know what sucked about this too is that the "real world" which is masked by the matrix is boring and ugly.

seriously! being plugged into the matrix seems like a pretty sweet deal.

Q: Why was the mushroom so popular? A: He was a fungi (latebloomer), Monday, 8 December 2008 20:07 (seventeen years ago)

Omar OTM, "Speed Racer" was MUCH better than both sequels.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 8 December 2008 22:59 (seventeen years ago)

ugh, this movie. you know what sucked about this too is that the "real world" which is masked by the matrix is boring and ugly. i would rather have had a couple more movies completely within the matrix program, with neo and the rest kind of working undercover like a viral program, instead of this leather fetish rave fighting bullshit. and considering how "smart" this movies were supposed to be, the last two are so, so stupid.

i did see v for vendetta in the end, it was good, i suppose.

speed racer was better than revolutions, btw.

― omar little, Monday, December 8, 2008 8:01 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

it's true tho, the whole hook of the first one is that once you know the truth you can learn kung fu instantly and become superman... and travel thru phones and shit. why would you want to set your movie outside of that??

s1ocki, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:07 (seventeen years ago)

Because you want to have a crazy rave sequence mayhaps.

Alex in SF, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:16 (seventeen years ago)

A boring crazy rave sequence, at that.

Ca-hoot na na na oh oh (HI DERE), Monday, 8 December 2008 23:21 (seventeen years ago)

i think the first matrix was clearly made with no sequel in mind. this wasn't some kind of lord of the rings all-of-one-piece thing.

i think also neo turning into an incredibly uninteresting cipher with no personality in the last two films was also a bad move. yeah lol keanu joeks but in the first he was a really great character and we empathized with his situation. but once he was "the one" there was nothing left for him to discover except...i dunno, greater powers? who gives a shit.

omar little, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:24 (seventeen years ago)

"i think the first matrix was clearly made with no sequel in mind."

Would have been nice if they hadn't allowed for the possibility of one then.

Alex in SF, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:27 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i know but if no sequel came about it could have existed as a single standalone film with no trouble whatsoever. i think they painted themselves into a corner with all the interesting character arcs completely front-loaded into the first film.

omar little, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:30 (seventeen years ago)

i think it was obviously made with a sequel in mind, esp with that last shot, but with no clear idea of what would be in that sequel.

s1ocki, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:36 (seventeen years ago)

Star Wars (and arguably Empire Strikes Back) are better than any of their sequels because the universe in which the story takes place is being unveiled/explored by the film as much as by the audience. The film is aware that a curtain is being drawn back, that the audience is being taken on a voyage of discovery, and paces itself accordingly. Think how much time both Star Wars and The Matrix spend gathering characters, doling out info in small bites, and ramping things up before all is revealed and the "epic battle" plots kick in -- and how much care they devote to textural variety outside the big action sequences. I'm thinking especially of the scene in The Matrix where Neo first visits the Oracle in her faux Chicago tenement. It's so rich and surprising and realistically detailed. The Wachowskis take time with it, and don't seem primarily concerned with kicking your eyeballs in with wicked awesome shit. There's nothing like it in either of the sequels, which lack any sense of wonder or exploration. Therefore, tedious, boxed-in, unsurprising.

Suggest Ban Permalink (contenderizer), Monday, 8 December 2008 23:37 (seventeen years ago)

I don't know, the second one pretty much holds up until Neo finds out the "secret" of the Matrix, at which point it gets kind of retarded.

Ca-hoot na na na oh oh (HI DERE), Monday, 8 December 2008 23:38 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah I'll basically watch the entire second one and enjoy it up until the trucks hit each other and blow up. The rest is inconsequential

El Tomboto, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:40 (seventeen years ago)

well i think they weren't planning a sequel to complete this story, is what i meant. they were hedging their bets in both directions. obviously the door was left open. kind of like the first star wars, which could have made sense as a single film too. but i think that particular universe allowed for more possibilities than the matrix series.

omar little, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:41 (seventeen years ago)

give me the car chase from reloaded and that's it imo

omar little, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:42 (seventeen years ago)

That car chase is one of the greatest things ever filmed, is the thing.

Ca-hoot na na na oh oh (HI DERE), Monday, 8 December 2008 23:42 (seventeen years ago)

exploding digital vagina scene > car chase

s1ocki, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:44 (seventeen years ago)

I don't know if they clearly meant for a sequel, but I think the first one ends well, similar to Terminator 2's ominous ending where the heroes have won, but the future remains uncertain. Agree with Omar that it could have been a standalone film, and probably should have remained that way.

As inferior as the sequels are, at least there are some fun fight scenes and chases, I guess, especially in the second one. One problem I had was that compared to the first one, all the fights seemed really too "soft". Like in the first one, that scene where Morpheus is getting his ass whooped by Smith before they capture him, there is this wonderfully crunchy moment where his head gets put through a toilet seat. I can't really think of any moments in the second two movies that had that kind of impact, despite all the bullets, flying and zipping around and cascading building collapses - the CG had just gotten far overused.

Nhex, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:46 (seventeen years ago)

^Wait, what?

Nhex, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:46 (seventeen years ago)

I've said this elsewhere but it was really disappointing to me that after adding all this other fairly interesting and exotic stuff to the universe they proceeded to do nothing with it in Revolutions. Hey there's this whole other underworld of rogue apps in the matrix that do weird things outside the bounds of the agents or the humans, but nevermind, we're setting the finale in the boring wasteland where magic doesn't exist.

El Tomboto, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:47 (seventeen years ago)

Getting Leigh Brackett to write Empire is the big plus for that film (although this depends on whether you believe she wrote it, I guess.)

Alex in SF, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:49 (seventeen years ago)

Basically there was a possiblity of doing something interesting with a Matrix sequel, but these guys were probably not the ones to write it.

Alex in SF, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:50 (seventeen years ago)

Also its funny how the movie franchise that re-made Keanu's career features him traveling between realities through a telephone, just like the far more superior Bill & Ted series.

As I was watching this last night I asked me friend "Why are they all wearing sunglasses?" Then I remembered this...

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:53 (seventeen years ago)

i think you know your well has run dry when your idea of taking it to another level is just adding an extra couple hundred cgi hugo weavings

omar little, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:55 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah they really lost the plot on the fight stuff sadly which was my favorite part of the first film.

Alex in SF, Monday, 8 December 2008 23:56 (seventeen years ago)

Btw the future is totally going to be the Matrix but without any clear distinction between human and robots due to nanotechnology and genetic programming.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 00:45 (seventeen years ago)

At first I thought that said garlic programming, which would be cool.

Suggest Ban Permalink (contenderizer), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 00:48 (seventeen years ago)

yes we know exactly how the future is going to be

Q: Why was the mushroom so popular? A: He was a fungi (latebloomer), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 00:52 (seventeen years ago)

I think the first movie is pretty much perfect. The story as continued in the second and third films makes sense and is not hermetic if you watch with a close eye, but it's a terribly boring story.

HOOS wearing bitchmade sweaters and steendriving (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 01:27 (seventeen years ago)

Such a terrible idea to write a you-must-watch-closely supersubtle plot to accompany a noisy bludgeoning actioner.

HOOS wearing bitchmade sweaters and steendriving (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 01:28 (seventeen years ago)

decided early on that i wasn't gonna see pts 2+3, has been easiest ever resolution to keep

country matters, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 01:31 (seventeen years ago)

Matrix Resolutions

s1ocki, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 01:52 (seventeen years ago)

Just read this website and the story is finally making some sense to me.

http://www.thematrix101.com/reloaded/meaning.php
http://www.thematrix101.com/revolutions/meaning.php

But if I had to take a test on the the plot of the Matrix trilogy I would fail.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 02:09 (seventeen years ago)

it's not that the over-arcing story didn't make sense, it's that it was, as Hoos said, boring.

Q: Why was the mushroom so popular? A: He was a fungi (latebloomer), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 02:30 (seventeen years ago)

I liked the planet o' Agent Smiths OK, but this was pretty much donkey balls all around.

Even having enjoyed Reloaded more than most, to my mind this is the most anticlimactic series of films ever, amirite? By "series," I do not mean standalone features that have unnecessary cash-in sequels tacked on, but films which were intended as serials from the outset.

D'Andrelo, the gay white ex-con (Pillbox), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 02:45 (seventeen years ago)

What's good about the first film is the Agent Smith / Cypher dynamic. One wants in, the other wants out.

Cypher may well be a villain but he also appears to be the only one who has grasped *the basic reality of the situation*, indeed, and

Smith's "humanisation" by the matrix is an entertaining reversal of the usual Terminator / Star Trek-style "what does it mean ... to be HUMAN?" business. Smith's answer: it SUCKS, it makes me BAD AT MY JOB.

Also the 1st film has considerable (surely intentional!) comedy value which is very much helped along by the utter humourlessness of Morpheus at al. As of Reloaded, the humourlessness takes over.

Neil Willett, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 06:45 (seventeen years ago)

As of Reloaded, the humourlessness takes over.

oh this is some bullshit

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 06:52 (seventeen years ago)

reloaded is chockablock with all manner of gags

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 06:53 (seventeen years ago)

in fact the abandonment of haw-haws in the third act is probably another one of the main reasons I have no use for it after the trucks

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 06:53 (seventeen years ago)

apocalypse haw

HOOS wearing bitchmade sweaters and steendriving (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 06:58 (seventeen years ago)

Smith's "humanisation" by the matrix is an entertaining reversal of the usual Terminator / Star Trek-style "what does it mean ... to be HUMAN?" business. Smith's answer: it SUCKS, it makes me BAD AT MY JOB

This is a good point, the more I think about it now the more it seems like it was supposed to be the humans and machines reaching a compromise, what with the program Rama talking about love and the "human" Morpheus talking about machines and people needing each other. I wish there was more of this dialog than mechs-blasting-zillions of squid-bots but what the hey...

To me the whole "Neo is the One, no Neo is not the One, wait Neo IS the One but he can't change anything, wait Neo is controlling the real world with his mind" was the most confusing bit. Hopefully seeing these Animatrix things will clear up some of the timeline for me..

in fact the abandonment of haw-haws in the third act is probably another one of the main reasons I have no use for it after the trucks

― TOMBOT, Tuesday, December 9, 2008 1:53 AM (12 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest

Come on, you'd miss out on Persephone's perfect tits! I'm glad she's in all the scenes with the silly French dude so I can just tune him out cos otherwise he'd be pretty annoying.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 19:18 (seventeen years ago)

I thought the trucks happened after Persephone's tits...?

Ca-hoot na na na oh oh (HI DERE), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 19:23 (seventeen years ago)

he thinks I'm referring to the thread title instead of the third act of Reloaded

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 19:23 (seventeen years ago)

Wow, I am watching the Second Renaissance right now and it is amazing, shocking, and mind-bending. Much much much better than those sequels. I'm tempted to say I like it better than the Matrix but it's too short!

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 22:42 (seventeen years ago)

Beyond and Matriculations are even better but The Second Renaissance could've made for a great Matrix prequel perhaps

Yentl vs Predator (blueski), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 22:51 (seventeen years ago)

My memory of Revolutions is more or less three solid hours of gurning grunts strapped into comically large exoskeletons shooting ridiculously many rounds of ammunition into endless streams of those squid robot thingys. Punctuated by a brief interlude of cartoon Keanu battling a thousand cartoon Mr Smiths, animated with the style and quality of Hanna Barbera.

ledge, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 23:00 (seventeen years ago)

The Second Renaissance is by far the best of Animatrix imo

HOOS wearing bitchmade sweaters and steendriving (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 23:12 (seventeen years ago)

omfg those exoskeletons were totally ridiculous. this is what happens when you try to make mecha vaguely realistic - you wind up with a stupid ass artillery platform that's slower and more fragile than one that's on wheels, and as a bonus in Revolutions they also don't carry enough ammunition to last more than two minutes. That shit was ridiculous with the fucking handcart.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 00:01 (seventeen years ago)

they should've been at the rave in the mech suits

Yentl vs Predator (blueski), Wednesday, 10 December 2008 00:15 (seventeen years ago)

its funny to me that everybody talks about the multi-Smith CGI that I didn't even notice at the time. What really stood out to me was the one long slow zoom on a rendered man-in-mech as the Sentinels began streaming in

HOOS wearing bitchmade sweaters and steendriving (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 10 December 2008 00:32 (seventeen years ago)

i was like "wtf this looks like a final fantasy vii cutscene why isn't everyone laughing at this"

HOOS wearing bitchmade sweaters and steendriving (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Wednesday, 10 December 2008 00:33 (seventeen years ago)

Too busy crying

ledge, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 09:25 (seventeen years ago)

I tend to contrast this with the Pirates of the Caribbean movies: in both cases I had faith coming out of the second one, and the third made me a fool with its incoherent mess, but At World's End at least had a sandship/Singapore/Keith Richards - lots of details to keep the attention. Also, you got the impression that they at least had a plot at some point before chopping bits out of it. Both of them have big spectacular endings that are inferior to the smaller setpieces in the second one (highway scene/three-way swordfight).

Also, I have watched At World's End twice, and nothing on this planet could make me sit through Revolutions again.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 14:26 (seventeen years ago)

At World's End probably has a better script and acting but I didn't enjoy it as much as Revolutions at the time (i may do on rewatch tho - not that i want to see either again tho)

Yentl vs Predator (blueski), Wednesday, 10 December 2008 14:42 (seventeen years ago)

At World's End >>>>>>>>>> Revolutions

Ca-hoot na na na oh oh (HI DERE), Wednesday, 10 December 2008 14:55 (seventeen years ago)

The 4 years in which The Matrix was worshipped and looked at as the next Star Wars or whatever were unbearable, and I'm eternally grateful to the sequels for being so shitty that even the fanboys jumped ship.

the cef (united nations children's fund ha ha) (some dude), Wednesday, 10 December 2008 14:57 (seventeen years ago)

omfg those exoskeletons were totally ridiculous. this is what happens when you try to make mecha vaguely realistic - you wind up with a stupid ass artillery platform that's slower and more fragile than one that's on wheels, and as a bonus in Revolutions they also don't carry enough ammunition to last more than two minutes. That shit was ridiculous with the fucking handcart.

― El Tomboto, Wednesday, December 10, 2008 12:01 AM (14 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

film criticism very much in character

s1ocki, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 15:00 (seventeen years ago)

"New Star Wars" sounds fair enough - well put together, amaaazing special effects for its time, vague mystical understructure. We just didn't have to wait 30 years to feel all the blood drain from our bodies.

Oh yeah also annoying fuckers claiming the original was "never that good" :)

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 16:19 (seventeen years ago)

i liked the original when it came out but i didn't love it

Q: Why was the mushroom so popular? A: He was a fungi (latebloomer), Wednesday, 10 December 2008 17:41 (seventeen years ago)

Oh yeah also annoying fuckers claiming the original was "never that good" :)
Seriously, no matter how annoying the other two got, the first one still holds up very well.

Nhex, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 20:05 (seventeen years ago)

i can see why the sequels might ruin the first film for people, tbh. there are some minor things in the original that are indicative of the coming shitstorm and now seem lamer.

omar little, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 20:07 (seventeen years ago)

listen slocki I'm just saying what everybody else is thinking.

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 20:37 (seventeen years ago)

I think there are a lot of things in the original that make you think they'd never chose the angle they took with the other two that can make you forget the shitstorm in rewatching

mh, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 21:20 (seventeen years ago)

The 4 years in which The Matrix was worshipped and looked at as the next Star Wars or whatever were unbearable, and I'm eternally grateful to the sequels for being so shitty that even the fanboys jumped ship.

A-FUCKING-MEN

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 21:21 (seventeen years ago)

yeah that was sort of the most hilarious fallout from the sequels. all these people who invested in the promise of this awesome universe got matrixrolled in the worst way

omar little, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 21:22 (seventeen years ago)

it's simple. Matrix was "for teenagers" in the same way Star Wars was "for kids".

Yentl vs Predator (blueski), Wednesday, 10 December 2008 22:22 (seventeen years ago)

I think you mean "for goths"

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 22:23 (seventeen years ago)

first movie is fucking retarded btw

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 22:23 (seventeen years ago)

like teenagers

Yentl vs Predator (blueski), Wednesday, 10 December 2008 22:25 (seventeen years ago)

lolz point taken

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 22:44 (seventeen years ago)

btw i can't think of the matrix without thinking of this first

omar little, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 23:25 (seventeen years ago)

"SEAN PILE"

Yentl vs Predator (blueski), Wednesday, 10 December 2008 23:27 (seventeen years ago)

yeah that was sort of the most hilarious fallout from the sequels. all these people who invested in the promise of this awesome universe got matrixrolled in the worst way

this guy was depressed for MONTHS afterword:

http://www.viceland.com/int/dos_donts/1652/main.jpg

Q: Why was the mushroom so popular? A: He was a fungi (latebloomer), Thursday, 11 December 2008 00:35 (seventeen years ago)

Some fans persist. I helped a 20-ish guy at work in the bookstore today who could have walked off the set of one of these movies, trenchcoat and all. No, he did not remove his black lolmatrixglasses indoors.

Millsner, Thursday, 11 December 2008 00:39 (seventeen years ago)

i think there are a ton of douchebags who just dress like that, whether they like these movies or not.

the rev (al sharpton ha ha) (some dude), Thursday, 11 December 2008 00:45 (seventeen years ago)

they're called goths and they cannot die cuz they're like sexy leather vampire gods dontchaknow

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 11 December 2008 00:46 (seventeen years ago)

True, but the guy totally blindsided me (ok, I saw it coming) by bringing these movies up in conversation while we looked for some sci-fi books or graphic novels or whatever it was he came in for.

I think that a case could be made that the Matrix films DO have a sense of humour, but I'm not sure that the same could be said of their fans, at least IME.

Millsner, Thursday, 11 December 2008 00:54 (seventeen years ago)

"SEAN PILE"

― Yentl vs Predator (blueski), Wednesday, December 10, 2008 6:27 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

this is mega lolz should xpost with wanda sykes tribute thread

M0ntell J0rdan S. (and what), Thursday, 11 December 2008 01:03 (seventeen years ago)

never seen that chapelle, funny!!

I haven't gone back and re-watched the first to see what other hints it drops, but I know a massive one is when Neo gets interrogated and you see the giant Batcave TV-bank of The Architect!

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 11 December 2008 16:06 (seventeen years ago)

two years pass...

3d sequels apparently happening UH

idgi fridays (blueski), Monday, 24 January 2011 16:10 (fourteen years ago)

Meanwhile, the Wachowskis are also working on a futuristic Robin Hood retelling called Hood, which Reeves says is set to star Will Smith

Ned Raggett, Monday, 24 January 2011 16:46 (fourteen years ago)

Matrix sequels debunked. http://screenrant.com/matrix-4-5-bill-and-ted-3-keanu-reeves-rob-97796/

StanM, Monday, 24 January 2011 16:48 (fourteen years ago)

a futuristic Robin Hood retelling called Hood, which Reeves says is set to star Will Smith

ok this could be awesome

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Monday, 24 January 2011 17:21 (fourteen years ago)

two months pass...

so someone quickly tell me why the Neo who could do anything he wanted with the Matrix at the end of the first film is here in the third film, seemingly inside the Matrix, having a lame fight and getting his ass kicked.

Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 23:55 (fourteen years ago)

also why's everyone exploding. I'd say that this film would benefit from a more focused viewing, but.

Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 23:58 (fourteen years ago)

Awful, awful, awful film.

Davek (davek_00), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:00 (fourteen years ago)

five months pass...

i've just seen this for the first time since watching it in the cinema, and i am so. fuckin. confused.

Everything based outside the matrix (zion battle scenes etc )is awesome though, they should just have made a terminator sequel and told keanu to take his gere lite codology fuck off

talking heads, quiet smith (darraghmac), Saturday, 17 September 2011 00:07 (fourteen years ago)

*and* fuck off, obv

talking heads, quiet smith (darraghmac), Saturday, 17 September 2011 00:09 (fourteen years ago)

one year passes...

This series will be rehabilitated and will become trendy again -- especially with teen males -- before the decade is through. Right now it's obviously at the fifteen year mark of critical disrespect and forgetfulness, but it will make a comeback.

I thought of the series because of this commercial,

youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=loinY8MmVq8

Cunga, Friday, 26 April 2013 05:17 (twelve years ago)

two years pass...

this was bad

marcos, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:17 (nine years ago)

70% of this was a corny war movie

marcos, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:20 (nine years ago)

the rest is corny inconsistent gibberish

marcos, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:24 (nine years ago)

i remember seeing this in the theater with my high school friends and we all just simultaneously burst out laughing at the slow-mo close-up punch in the face

ciderpress, Tuesday, 22 March 2016 20:25 (nine years ago)

three years pass...

This series will be rehabilitated and will become trendy again -- especially with teen males -- before the decade is through. Right now it's obviously at the fifteen year mark of critical disrespect and forgetfulness, but it will make a comeback.

I thought of the series because of this commercial,

youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=loinY8MmVq8

― Cunga, Friday, April 26, 2013 12:17 AM (six years ago) bookmarkflaglink

not wrong but totally wrong at the same time

ILX’s bad boy (D-40), Thursday, 7 November 2019 00:38 (six years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.