Supersize Me C/D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So I saw this last night and I quite liked. Morgan Spurlock is really charming and the movie is pretty stern indictment without becoming overly preachy or condescending. The part on school lunch programs and gym cuts is just fucking horrifying.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 10 May 2004 04:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I want to see this, it looks interesting.

Nellie (nellskies), Monday, 10 May 2004 04:44 (twenty-one years ago)

i had a lot of problems with it, but admittedly the movie would have had to be MUCH longer to address everything that was neglected or left out.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 10 May 2004 05:00 (twenty-one years ago)

america itself just really needs to be ripped a shiny new goatse.cx-sized gaping anus.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 10 May 2004 05:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Well it's not meant to be comprehensive. But I think it made it's central argument (Eating this stuff is REALLY REALLY not a good idea and the fast food companies are trying their best to convince you this is not the case) pretty compellingly.

I wholeheartedly agree that America needs to wake the fuck up.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 10 May 2004 05:07 (twenty-one years ago)

some thoughts (via aim):

jbr: here's my big criticism of this whole thing...
jbr: there's so much more to it than just the fast food industry
jbr: and that sounds blindingly obvious, but it's really true
ckb: correct
jbr: it's the culture as a whole: it's car culture and suburban sprawl and expensive gyms keeping people from exercising, it's the way certain ethnic groups and classes have been taught to eat throughout history, it's the fact that there's food EVERYWHERE you go and you can't escape it
jbr: america just needs to be brought down in full
ckb: OTMFM
jbr: the other big problem with the movie was the guy's claim that eating at mcdonald's every day (or multiple times in a week) will make us all incredibly sick the way it did him -- ignoring the fact that chronic fast food eaters have established a physical tolerance it's taken them years to build up and it's usually only health nuts like him who get seriously ill when there's a very sudden change in diet. "a very sudden change in diet" killed karen carpenter, after she'd lived with anorexia for years and it was only fatal after she managed to get healthy again.
jbr: the body is resilient and can handle a fuck of a lot but not everything all at once.
ckb: mmhmmm
ckb: it's the similar situation with drug users, etc.
ckb: arrr... i'm probably going to be really annoyed by the movie
jbr: i think you will be
jbr: its heart is in the right place but sometimes it isn't -- sometimes it's just fat-mockery for its own sake
ckb: ugh
ckb: obesity is the last thing that is fair game to make fun of
jbr: uh huh
jbr: it's basically "i don't like the way you look so i'm going to use SCIENCE (cue oohs and ahhs) to make you feel like shit about yourself"
ckb: sigh
ckb: and it lumps all the stereotypes together
ckb: mcdonalds is bad. all fat people eat fast food., etc. etc.
jbr: i haven't eaten in mcdonald's in probably a year and a half. i hardly ever eat fast food.
ckb: in-and-out-burger is my last pseudo-fast food
ckb: and even then it's only once a month
jbr: once every six months i'll have white castle or taco bell or something
jbr: but i don't make a habit out of it
jbr: if i drink soda, it's almost always diet
jbr: the movie assumes that all people who drink soda drink regular
jbr: oh, another thing...
ckb: yah?
jbr: the movie talked about french fries being the only option for a value meal but i don't think it ever brought up the "dollar menu" that a lot of mcdonald's (and other fast food places) have, which sells "junior" sized items (junior cheeseburgers, etc) for a dollar each, giving people mix 'n' match options that don't have to include fries
jbr: i dunno if mcdonald's has phased that out or what, but it would definitely have been worth spurlock's time to look into

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 10 May 2004 05:22 (twenty-one years ago)

1. The first part of that is OTM, but obv that's a much much broader movie.
2. I don't get the invalidity of his experiment. Obv it's EXTREME, but it's also clear that eating fast food is basically doing the same thing to a lot of people, just over a longer period of time (conveniently disguising these effects until they get just a little older.)
3. I didn't see the fat mockery. There are a lot of obese people in the movie, but I didn't see the movie as observing them in a particularly cruel way. And obesity is more than a body image problem, it's a national health problem and needs to be treated as such and yes that means that attention is going to be focused on overweight people and it will be in a somewhat negative way. Frankly I think it beats ignoring it.
4. McDonald's is bad. It's bad for you. It's a bad company.
5. Crap food and a lack of exercise are the primary reason why people in this country are obese. Those aren't stereotypes those are facts.
6. I don't think the movie makes any assumptions about people who drink soda.
7. Diet soda is also bad for you.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 10 May 2004 05:48 (twenty-one years ago)

8. I know Wendy's and Jack in the Box have/had the dollar menu thing. I'm not sure McDonalds does/did, but obv even if they do almost everything on those menus are also very unhealthy too (most of the salads are as bad as the hamburgers at these places.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 10 May 2004 06:08 (twenty-one years ago)

"Although Spurlock concedes "my experiment may have been a little extreme," he notes that some people do eat at McDonald's regularly, even daily. But despite the plethora of calorie-packed dishes offered by McDonald's, he easily could have eaten three meals a day there without gaining weight.

For instance, an Egg McMuffin, orange juice, and coffee for breakfast; a grilled chicken bacon ranch salad and iced tea for lunch; and a double cheeseburger, medium fries, and diet Coke for dinner totalfewer than 1,800 calories, well under the 2,500 Spurlock's doctor says he needed to maintain his starting weight of 185 pounds. By contrast, Spurlock says he consumed some 5,000 calories a day, while deliberately avoiding physical activity."

- http://www.reason.com/sullum/050704.shtml

christhamrin (christhamrin), Monday, 10 May 2004 06:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I guess I'm pretty horrible for laughing at this, but I couldn't help but notice that McDonald's new CEO has colorectal cancer. Of course, this is the guy who is the replacement for the CEO who died of a heart attack last month.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:14 (twenty-one years ago)

i have responses for alex and more thoughts about the movie... will post later this afternoon.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)

For instance, an Egg McMuffin, orange juice, and coffee for breakfast; a grilled chicken bacon ranch salad and iced tea for lunch; and a double cheeseburger, medium fries, and diet Coke for dinner totalfewer than 1,800 calories, well under the 2,500 Spurlock's doctor says he needed to maintain his starting weight of 185 pounds. By contrast, Spurlock says he consumed some 5,000 calories a day, while deliberately avoiding physical activity."

a good point, but how many people at fast food restaurants do you see eating salads and forgoing the fries/mozz sticks/extra portion of chicken nuggets? also, what about the fat/cholesterol/sodium content of a chicken bacon ranch salad, french fries, dbl cheeseburger, etc?

lauren (laurenp), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the experiment is completely invalid in the sense that even though lots of people eat at McDonald's a lot, I doubt that many people eat EVERY SINGLE MEAL THREE TIMES A DAY at McDonald's, let alone supersizing EVERY SINGLE MEAL.

I eat at Burger King at least three times a week and have done so for the past two and a half years. I never (and I mean NEVER) have time to put together home-cooked meals for myself, so I eat out probably 95% of the time. Over the past two and a half years, I have lost 20 pounds and am actually closer to my pre-college fitness level than I have been since I got married. I have never had any serious health issues.

Blaming the fast food industry is a big fucking copout that frees people from the responsibility of managing their diets.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Quite frankly, I have about as much sympathy for people who say, "Oh, the fast food industry is making me fat and unhealthy" as I do for people who say "Oh, listening to all of that death metal made me dismember my dead friend and wear his testicles as earrings".

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:34 (twenty-one years ago)

well is the whole idea of the movie to present a managed diet?

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Given that I don't really know what the aim of the movie is I accept that my criticism could very well be groundless (and I do want to see it) but if it's presented as "LOOK WHAT THE EVIL FAST FOOD PEOPLE ARE DOING TO US" I will encourage the film to eat a supersized dick.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:37 (twenty-one years ago)

hahaha, okay. I wanna see it, it seems like it's not really so much an "experiment" as such.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:39 (twenty-one years ago)

it's interesting that we never learn what spurlock's eating habits were before he starts the experiment, or what his level of health and fitness is like before he's fit enough to brag about being in perfect health and have it validated by doctors. did he get in shape specifically for the project, or was his health always that stunningly perfect? and once he went off his vegan detox thing at the end, what did he go back to eating?

ok, i really do have to leave now.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you exercise a lot Dan, or are you just lucky?

The whole idea of the movie does rub me thing wrong way, in a "living a clearly unhealthy lifestyle is very bad for you shocker!" sort of way.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:43 (twenty-one years ago)

well yeah, but it might be worth remembering that not everyone gets the same educational opportunities we do...

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:46 (twenty-one years ago)

so this movie is educating whom exactly?

(i'm going now, i swear)

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I dunno! Whomever sees it, I guess. My point was that it shouldn't always be taken as a given that "everybody knows" something (in this case that eating a lot of junk food isn't that good for you).

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I do agree that if the movie is just marketed to people who already live healthy lifestyles, the point is kinda moot.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you exercise a lot Dan, or are you just lucky?

I don't exercise at all and haven't gotten any regular exercise since I was 18. I also don't eat particularly well. Basically, I eat in moderation; my lifestyle is very sedentary so there's absolutely no need for me to eat all that much. Granted, if I ever do get off of my ass and start exercising, you can bet that I will start eating more because I don't want to be Short Negro Jack Skellington.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:55 (twenty-one years ago)

But that's a brilliant Wu Tang name.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 13:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the experiment is completely invalid in the sense that even though lots of people eat at McDonald's a lot, I doubt that many people eat EVERY SINGLE MEAL THREE TIMES A DAY at McDonald's, let alone supersizing EVERY SINGLE MEAL.

that wasn't at all the point.

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I think my problem is that it's very hard for me to refrain from eating much unless I'm getting some regular exercise (as I found out when I started actually exercising after nine months of completely sedentary living).

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Mark, then what was the point? That's the only aspect of the movie the media is focusing on.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:02 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean, the movie itself is being marketed as "LOOK LOOK LOOK AMERICA FAST FOOD ISN'T HEALTHY", which I'm sorry bt given the media saturation of various diets, health crazes and nutritional information, if you haven't figured that out by now then you are either living somewhere with absolutely no media access (and therefore also no fast food) or are amazingly, mind-bogglingly ignorant.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Also: [...] I don't really know what the aim of the movie is I accept that my criticism could very well be groundless

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd take the latter.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean there are a lot of amazingly, mind-bogglingly ignorant people in this country. I'm confronted by that everytime I read the news. That said, it's not right to blame ignorance solely on the individual. As I stated on the Iraq prison abuse thread, a vast cross-section of the country's population is not afforded anything resembling a good education.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:11 (twenty-one years ago)

How does the film compare to Dave Chappelle's "WackArnolds" sketch?

j.lu (j.lu), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Conversely, it is not McDonald's responsibility to keep Joe Public from eating 60 Big Macs a month.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree, but McDonald's isn't exactly going to say no to someone buying their product, er food.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:14 (twenty-one years ago)

dan, you're treating the discourse on this as a binary when it's not. you said above that you eat burger king regularly, and you also seem to know that it IS unhealthy. aren't you remotely interested in a discussion on the disconnect between those two things?

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:15 (twenty-one years ago)

He only super-sized like 4 meals I think. (And only when prompted at the register.) I think it's safe to assume he was pretty helath conscious prior to the experiment, his girl being a vegetarian chef and all.

if you haven't figured that out by now then you are either living somewhere with absolutely no media access (and therefore also no fast food) or are amazingly, mind-bogglingly ignorant.

That still leaves: then why are people still eating so much of it? Why is American obesity still on the rise? Just how bad is McDonald's for you? The "I already knew it was bad for you, duh" is a bit of an unfair dismissal.

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Dan Perry OTM. Totally paternalistic bollocks. This sounds like a 90 minute road safety thing. Look both ways before you eat children!

NRQ, Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Look both ways before you eat children!

The images this calls to mind are suspect and varied.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:21 (twenty-one years ago)

god, I could go for some general tso's children right now.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:23 (twenty-one years ago)

The entire point is "eat in moderation". Unless you have food allergies, how much you eat is just as important as what you eat, if not more.

You will note that I never actually said that eating at Burger King or McDonald's is unhealthy; what I said was eating three supersized meals a day at McDonald's while shunning exercise is unhealthy. Similarly, eating a pound of oranges every day is healthy, or eating nothing but lettuce is unhealthy. I'm not the one making this into a binary issue (or, if I am, the binary is between "eating like an idiot" and "eating in moderation").

xpost Okay, if dude was primarily vegetarian before doing this, then this is even more invalid; radically shocking your body by slamming into a completely different diet, particularly if you're shifting exclusively towards foods you don't normally eat, is going to cause your body to have a fit.

That still leaves: then why are people still eating so much of it?

Because PEOPLE OVEREAT.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:23 (twenty-one years ago)

The "I already knew it was bad for you, duh" is a bit of an unfair dismissal.

So?

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:24 (twenty-one years ago)

So you wanna step outside, burger boy?

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I think it's also because they don't know WHY fast food is bad, and when faced with a blanket statement like 'all mcdonalds is bad' they just disbelieve or give up. I don't think people read labels or know that processed foods lack fiber and shock your system into producing a ton of insulin, or what partially hydrogenated fats are all about, etc etc.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)

haha dan you just said it 20 posts back! wtf?!

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I REWRITE HISTORY!

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:30 (twenty-one years ago)

We've always been at work with EurMcDonalds.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:31 (twenty-one years ago)

History is a Big Mac slamming down onto a human face FOREVER.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Looking back, I see that my brevity is again undermining me.

My entire point is "Moderation is the key". Eating nothing but McDonald's is worse for you than eating nothing but salad, but unless you are super-diligent about the composition of your salad that diet isn't particularly healthy for you, either (or are we going to assume that the stick-thin look sweeping Hollywood at the moment is actually healthy?).

What I meant above was really "LOOK AMERICA EATING NOTHING BUT MCDONALD'S IS UNHEALTHY".

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:33 (twenty-one years ago)

To be fair I had all these very same cynical reactions to the "experiment" but in the context of it being used to further stir discussion about the dangers of fast food, I think it does some good.

Side note: nothing annoys me more then when "documentaries" use man-on-the-street interviews to make their point.

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)

alex nailed it earlier. the gimmick behind the movie is nothing more than a hook on which to hang the main message. i don't think spurlock is trying to carbon copy the average american diet here, and i'm sure he would acknowledge that the everyday mcdonalds frequenter is somewhat anomalic. but that doesn't render his experiment invalid.

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:38 (twenty-one years ago)

- The experiment is far more extreme than regular eating habits.
- There was ONE data point in the experiment; a person who avoided fast food. There was no control subject (an occasional fast-food eater) or a data point on the other extreme (someone who eats nothing but fast food).

Given these two pieces of information, the only useful information that you can glean from the experiment is that sudden radical alterartions to your diet can make your body freak out in deeply unpleasant way.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)

This is akin to those experiments where scientists put a rat in a little box so it can't move and feed it nothing but sugar and then go "WOW SUGAR MAKES YOU FAT BAN IT ALL!!!!!!"

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Still, I do want to see the movie.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:47 (twenty-one years ago)

dan do you even know what happened to him at the end of the month?

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, I do.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)

i suppose you could've told him that was going to happen before he started too?

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, actually.

But hey, continue talking down to me if it makes you feel better.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Or try reading my posts where I say "Exclusive diets of [x] are bad for you."

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Or go eat a dick. At this point it's all the same to me.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Again, there's a difference b/n saying things like "bad for you" and "a shock to the system" and witnessing the actual effects as observed by different physicians and specialists.

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)

But if you switch your entire diet to dick, it will probably have grave health consequences.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:59 (twenty-one years ago)

eating a dick would be an exclusive diet, yeah.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 14:59 (twenty-one years ago)

spurling had a cardiologist, a gastro-enterologist and a general practitioner administering regular checkups along the way, and all three were all shocked by the nature of the result. it was a specific, life-threatening ailment far above and beyond being obese and unhealthy. call me ignorant or uneducated or whatever, but i was still surprised, even in spite of the fact that i already knew mcdonalds was bad for you. go figure.

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 15:02 (twenty-one years ago)

bnw, I don't discount that; I discount the conclusion he drew from his experiment because (from what I understand and I'm certain I could be wrong, which is one reason why I want to see the movie) he started from a biased premise and ran the experiment on a limited dataset with no control subject.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 15:03 (twenty-one years ago)

If you eat enough oranges, you will get scurvy and your teeth will fall out.

Maybe I just retained more information from those random health classes than normal, I don't know; given the information presented to me via public school classes I formed an impression early on that health is signified by eating a balanced diet (which I extrapolated to food prepration and portion size) and there's nothing balanced about a diet that is exclusively McDonald's (partially due to preparation and partially due to caloric intake).

I also maintain that if he actively avoided fast food before switching to a diet of nothing but, his body was not going to handle it and it really shouldn't be a surprise that his liver freaked out.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 15:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought oranges prevented scurvy?

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 15:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Oranges (or rather the vitamin C in them) do prevent scurvy, but if you overdose on vitamins you begin developing the nutritional diseases that they are supposed to prevent.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

so scurvy is caused by both a deficiency and an overabundance of vitamin C? I've never heard that before.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, I am now second-guessing myself on that.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 15:15 (twenty-one years ago)

You can actually kill yourself by eating too many bananas. I think it leads to Congestive Heart Failure but I forgot how.

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)

ODing on vitamins can be a problem, but I've never heard the 'too much vitamin C means you get scurvy' argument either. Curious.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 15:33 (twenty-one years ago)

B6 is very nasty if you have too much. Your sense of proprioception disappears, and so never know where your limbs are.

Ricardo (RickyT), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 15:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I just love that dan's been railing against a movie he hasnt seen for like 50 posts.

bill stevens (bscrubbins), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 15:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Momus to thread? (I'm already here, see.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 15:57 (twenty-one years ago)

i want to do this experiment by eating nothing but fuddruckers for a month.

ryan (ryan), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)

1. I'm not railing against the movie, I am railing against the conclusions drawn by the movie.
2. Unlike Momus, I have repeatedly said that I want to see the movie.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 16:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Lets us not forget.

http://www.boners.com/content/791112.1.jpg

Chris 'The Velvet Bingo' V (Chris V), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Let us not forget.

http://www.boners.com/content/791112.1.jpg

Chris 'The Velvet Bingo' V (Chris V), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)

(NB I am completely wrong on the scurvy thing, apparently overdosing on vitamin C causes greasy discharge to shoot out of your anus.)

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 17:04 (twenty-one years ago)

yikes, TMI Dan.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 17:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, high doses of vitamin C can leech the calcium out of your bones, causing your teeth to fall out (hence my initial scurvy confusion).

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Side note: nothing annoys me more then when "documentaries" use man-on-the-street interviews to make their point.

OTM OTM OTM

Oldest trick in the book: Get three or four schlubs-on-the-street who'll say things that make your argument look good, pretend those three or four people represent all of humanity, and ignore what anyone else has to say. Spurlock did it here. Did he ever attempt to educate any of those unwashed lumpens firsthand about the dangers of their diets, or was he just using the subjects for quotes? Did he offer to send them tapes of the movie when it was done? I really doubt it.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:04 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah i bet he repeatedly kicked them in the crotch after the interview was concluded for good measure.

bill stevens (bscrubbins), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Did he use his time with the schoolchildren to tell them McDonald's isn't good for them, or was he only there for the opportunity to go "tsk tsk" because the kids recognized a picture of Ronald McDonald but couldn't identify Jesus Christ?

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I always wonder how many people were interviewed who didn't reinforce his argument. (Actually, Jay Leno doing this to prove people are stupid, annoys me even more.)

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I would prefer it if this documentary had footnotes, too.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Well why couldn't it be longer? Its main goal is supposed to be education, not entertainment.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I haven't seen it yet but I'm guessing its goal is "edutainment."

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:15 (twenty-one years ago)

i know, i know, it's supposed to be light and fluffy to reach all those lumpen morons who Don't Know Better.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:15 (twenty-one years ago)

well arent public school kids SUPPOSED to not know what jesus looks like? My first reaction to the jesus thing was like 'man those kids are stupid.' but then I remembered the constitution..

i wonder if spurlock was convincing those kids that they need to eat sprouds and tofu and whatnot.

bill stevens (bscrubbins), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I think they would have stabbed his eyes out with their sporks.

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha you are all now making me pine for a movie that never was.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:18 (twenty-one years ago)

if krs-one has taught us anything, it's that edutainment just doesn't work people.

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:19 (twenty-one years ago)

bbbbut "You Must Learn" is a good song!

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:20 (twenty-one years ago)

it would have been great if "supersize me" ended with "say children...what does it all mean?"

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:21 (twenty-one years ago)

anyway, you guys who haven't seen the movie yet are sure posting a lot.

my bottom line is that i don't necessarily disagree with the film's message -- the main thing that left a bad taste in my mouth was the "shockah" sensationalism of the filmmaking choices and the unanswered and barely answered questions about obesity and food intake.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:22 (twenty-one years ago)

'cause it's about time
one of y'all hear it
first-hand
from the intelligent
brown man
a vegetarian
no goat or ham
or chicken or turkey or hamburger
'cause to me that's suicide
self-murder

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I think that despite the tone of my arguments, my general take on the movie wil align with JBR's.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I want to make a documentary about how sitting in movie theaters watching documentarys is bad for you. I will sit in a theater for a month watching Nanook of the North and Hoop Dreams, consuming only Mr. Pibb and popcorn with extra "butter" and emerge from the theater pasty and bloated, thus proving my hypothesis. A group of schoolchildren will recognize Errol Morris but not Santa Claus. The public will weep.

NA (Nick A.), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I wanted to know how the big mac king of the midwest didnt kill himself. they kinda threw you a bone with the 'he doesnt eat the fries.' but seriously people. he ate like 9 big macs in one day!

cindy, I dont get what you didnt get about obesity and food intake. Did you want a side note about metabolism and thyroid conditions? I think the point was to get people to think about the connections between the fast food industry, sedentary lifestyles and the resulting health crisis in america.

the one thing i thought was kinda silly is that its basically preaching to the converted. i think everyone who read fast food nation went to see it, and there was no big surprises if thats the case.

bill stevens (bscrubbins), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:27 (twenty-one years ago)

cindy, I dont get what you didnt get about obesity and food intake.

well for one, there was some serious springer shit going on in this movie. how about interviewing people who eat fast food semi-regularly who AREN'T 500 pounds and on their deathbeds, who DON'T drink 9-gallon jugs of non-diet soda? why show us these really extreme cases? what's the point if the majority of people, even overweight people, don't consume anywhere near that in a day?

the big mac guy was skinny, but i kinda wondered what his deal was (aside from him seeming somewhat autistic), whether he was bulimic or what.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:33 (twenty-one years ago)

(also, are you REALLY going to criticize developmentally challenged people for making bad choices?)

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Im sure the nature of the medium prohibited a comprehensive view of everything. if it was 'fair and balanced' so to speak, it would be 4 hours long and fucking boring.

but if anything, this thread is good because it brings you back from the hype of the film. i call it 'michael moore syndrome'

bill stevens (bscrubbins), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Im sure the nature of the medium prohibited a comprehensive view of everything. if it was 'fair and balanced' so to speak, it would be 4 hours long and fucking boring.

yeah, but it would also be fair and balanced.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:42 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.boners.com/content/791721.1.jpg

martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)

wheeeeeeee!

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I only drink 9-gallon jugs of DIET soda.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:45 (twenty-one years ago)

that's great. your risk of diabetes has decreased drastically.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:46 (twenty-one years ago)

No. I eat bags of sugar when I drink them.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:48 (twenty-one years ago)

But no worries. At least I don't do anything gross like eat a cheeseburger, ewwwwww

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 11 May 2004 20:49 (twenty-one years ago)

just as i suspected:

Sandy Szwarc, a registered nurse and certified culinary professional who has written often for Tech Central Station on nutrition and health issues, told me how Sumo wrestlers will fast to gain the weight they need before a wrestling tournament. Fast to gain weight? Yes. Why? Because when you start eating normally again, the fasting leads to the rebound effect -- a sharp weight gain to a higher weight level as a result of a lower metabolism. It is the body's defense against starvation. And nobody says Japanese food is unhealthy.

Did Spurlock do that? There are hints in the movie. One of his doctors giving him his first exam notes that Spurlock "fasted" before taking it to get a base level reading on his cholesterol and other health factors. He didn't fast before his other exams, though. Spurlock also threw up while eating his first super size meal. It adds to the gross out factor, but if you'd shrunk your stomach you might do that too if you forced down a big meal.

In addition, Spurlock stopped exercising regularly after he started the experiment -- supposedly because he wanted to do what average Americans do. But it served a dual purpose -- it kept his metabolism low allowing his weight to balloon.

Finally, Spurlock hasn't been able to get back to 185. Could that be because he's back to his normal weight?

Spurlock doesn't exactly lie. But he also doesn't provide significant details. One detail he did include, though, was of a Wisconsin man, Donald Gorske, who every day eats two or three Big Macs with a Coke and fries. He's done so for 30 years, including all the holidays, and his cholesterol at 140 was less than Spurlock's at the start of his "experiment."

http://www.techcentralstation.com/033004E.html

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 00:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Spurlock also has a history of grossing out and making fun of people for entertainment

"Extra" told you last year about the shoots for a New York-based webcast called, "I Bet You Will," devoted to the concept that "people will do anything for money." Back then, for instance, the show's creator, Morgan Spurlock, paid a young woman $450 to gulp nine shots of vile liquids, and another guy $235 to eat a giant jar of mustard. Now Spurlock has hit the big time. His show has been picked up by MTV.

Spurlock still runs the shoots, but now he has co-hosts, including Godfrey and singer Willa Ford. Morgan says, "We have a bigger budget now, to say the least."

It's not going on prize money though. Godfrey says, "I can get people to do it for free, just because they're on MTV. They don't care. People are crazy."

The biggest gross out so far in the MTV version is this $250 shocker. Morgan says, "We bet a girl to let us shave her head into a Mohawk. We combined it with three sticks of butter and she ate her own hair in this giant butter hairball."

http://extratv.warnerbros.com/dailynews/extra/06_02/06_20b.html

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 00:23 (twenty-one years ago)

what is "And nobody says Japanese food is unhealthy." supposed to mean?

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 00:24 (twenty-one years ago)

i dunno. i thought that line was stupid too. there's a lot of fried food in japanese cuisine.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 00:25 (twenty-one years ago)

That article seems like it was written to pander directly to me!

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 00:25 (twenty-one years ago)

"people will do anything for money."

like make movies!

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 00:26 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah that sentence seemed too weird/unrealistic to me to stick in there.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 00:27 (twenty-one years ago)

What kind of wuss can't eat a supersize McDonald's meal without throwing up? I mean, lots of normal people go to diners and cafes and order a burger (often much larger than a Big Mac or QP) and fries (a heap of 'em) with a coke (often refilled), and they don't puke. The noble project of revealing the fast-food industry's sins don't seem very well served by the hysterical nature of this movie.

Chris Elliot drank an entire bottle of Wesson once without losing it!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 00:27 (twenty-one years ago)

the show's creator, Morgan Spurlock, paid a young woman $450 to gulp nine shots of vile liquids

obviously this guy REALLY CARES about people's health.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 00:27 (twenty-one years ago)

It's not going on prize money though. [Co-host] Godfrey says, "I can get people to do it for free, just because they're on MTV. They don't care. People are crazy."

Translation: "People worship their evil corporate overlords, even if it makes them violently ill. Suckers."

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 00:59 (twenty-one years ago)

What kind of wuss can't eat a supersize McDonald's meal without throwing up?

Now that I know Spurlock's background as a "shock jock" grossout guy (and an MTV one! Why was this never brought up in the movie? That's some major info to be withholding), I wonder whether he engineered the vomiting incident to happen that way.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 01:14 (twenty-one years ago)

That news story is from June 20, 2002 btw.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 01:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Also it's worth noting that McDonald's is one of MTV's key advertisers and undoubtedly generates A LOT of revenue for the network.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 01:48 (twenty-one years ago)

The plot thickens, and here's where the ball makes a dizzying THWAK back into Spurlock's court:

I stand by all the theories I posted above but PLEASE disregard one of the sources I quoted -- Tech Central Station. It's a front for a PR firm and Republican lobbying group called DCI and one of their sponsors is, wouldn't you know, McDonald's.

Hoo boy.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 02:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha like I said, that article was pandering directly to my preconceived notions!

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 02:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha oh Jesus. That's terrible. It's linked from the NYTimes.com too.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 02:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Translation: "People worship their evil corporate overlords, even if it makes them violently ill. Suckers."

isn't that one of the ideas behind the movie?

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 03:08 (twenty-one years ago)

yes it is. that's what i was saying.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 03:18 (twenty-one years ago)

right, so his MTV work isn't much different.

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 03:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Now that I know Spurlock's background as a "shock jock" grossout guy (and an MTV one! Why was this never brought up in the movie? That's some major info to be withholding)

I wondered why MTV was pimping this movie so much this past weekend.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 03:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I think Super Size Me's major triumph is that because it was solely financed by Spurlock's earnings from the MTV show (this has been documented, but I'm not digging up the link right now), and MTV gets mad ad revenue from Mickey D's, this brazenly anti-McDonald's movie was also (albeit indirectly) partially paid for by... McDonald's!

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 03:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Somehow I don't think that makes Mickey D's very happy (and Mickey D's being unhappy makes me happy.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 03:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Selfishly speaking, I wish the movie focused more on the McDonald's-is-manipulative-and-deceitful stuff than the McDonald's-will-make-you-fat stuff -- it might make for less entertaining entertainment but as investigative journalism goes it's a hell of a lot more interesting (to me).

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 03:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Faster than you can say "Jared", Super Size Me has also inspired it's own share of copycat dieters who are reaching different conclusions.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 03:43 (twenty-one years ago)

I think it's much harder to do movies like that though, because film is such a manipulative and deceitful medium. But I agree that it is a more interesting theme.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 03:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha he's NOT really copying when he's excersing like a freakin' madman.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 03:49 (twenty-one years ago)

geocities sites are definitive sources, don'tchaknow?

QUOTATIONS FROM CHAIRMAN MAYO (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 03:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Selfishly speaking, I wish the movie focused more on the McDonald's-is-manipulative-and-deceitful stuff than the McDonald's-will-make-you-fat stuff -- it might make for less entertaining entertainment but as investigative journalism goes it's a hell of a lot more interesting (to me).

I did find it mystifying that the movie didn't once mention the McSpotlight trial which comprehensively brought to light McDonald's practices w.r.t. nutrition, advertising, environmental effects, treatment of animals, employment practices, and effects on global culture. The documentary about the case is 100 times more interesting (and contentful) than Super Size Me.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 03:51 (twenty-one years ago)

geocities sites are definitive sources, don'tchaknow?

And people who post anonymously with yahoo email accounts have something to hide. Your point?

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 03:53 (twenty-one years ago)

People who haven't seen the movie yet are definitive sources too. Right?

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 03:54 (twenty-one years ago)

my point is there's no way to tell if that guy's site is in any way accurate or objective or anything. That should be obvious.

QUOTATIONS FROM CHAIRMAN MAYO (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 03:59 (twenty-one years ago)

which makes it of course similar to the movie, probably. But hey, if you wanna shut down discussion by saying only those who've seen it are qualified, be my guest, BURGER FASCIST!

(joking.)

QUOTATIONS FROM CHAIRMAN MAYO (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:00 (twenty-one years ago)

my point is there's no way to tell if that guy's site is in any way accurate or objective or anything. That should be obvious.

I was just telling him that. ;-)

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm lovin' it, er, it's all good.

QUOTATIONS FROM CHAIRMAN MAYO (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:05 (twenty-one years ago)

which makes it of course similar to the movie, probably.

Of course. There's scant information to go on in Super Size Me and I'm disappointed that the only criticism comes from the corporate right-wing.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not the corporate right wing! I don't work for McDonald's; I haven't accepted any money from McDonald's; I don't even eat at McDonald's (more than like twice a year if even that)! I just didn't really like the film.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I spend my time criticizing stuff that I don't largely agree with, Chris.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I criticize myself a lot too, Alex.

QUOTATIONS FROM CHARRED MAYO (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I love me and I give me love.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I said I'm lovin' it, not I'm lovin' me.

QUOTATIONS FROM CHARRED MAYO (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:18 (twenty-one years ago)

But seriously most people who don't like McDonalds (like me) are probably just happy that a relatively high-profile movie is making some valid points (even ones occassionally buried by hype and silliness) to spend too much time attacking the flick (esp. when they know that McDonald's is spending millions to make sure the techcentral.com's of the world get their twenty-two cents in.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I am happy it's making some valid points but I hate to think that people might be taking it as the definitive word on the subject and that people who know better are excusing its fatal flaws because "hey, at least it's out there."

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Well ideally I would hope everyone would read a lot more on the subject (cuz there sure is a lot more out there) but I think the film largely has its heart largely in the right place. But also I don't think any of its flaws are fatal or even close to it. If I did maybe I would want to get pissier about it.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:29 (twenty-one years ago)

And even if it DID have fatal flaws, I wouldn't spend a great deal of time dwelling on them, cuz ya know the fucking team of lawyers McDonald's hires are gonna do that for me.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:33 (twenty-one years ago)

haha they're right though! that's the thing: almost everything in that techcentralstation article seems OTM enough for me (although i'd want a real third-party nutritionist to back up the info).

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:36 (twenty-one years ago)

As soon I see that 1800 calorie thing, I know it's bullshit.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Not to mention, I'm pretty sure that he said that he hadn't eaten for 24 hours (correct me if I am wrong is pretty standard for a lot of blood tests) which does not = fasting in my book. He certainly is eating the night before.

Also the guy who eats all the Big Macs is said in the movie to rarely eat fries (I remember no comment on his soda consumption.)

So that's three bullshit things right there.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Also the guy who eats all the Big Macs is said in the movie to rarely eat fries (I remember no comment on his soda consumption.)

A Big Mac still has three slices of bread, high-fat red meat, cheese, and mayo. It's bad enough without the fries and soda.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:52 (twenty-one years ago)

(correct me if I am wrong is pretty standard for a lot of blood tests)

in my experience it's more like 12 hours (at most).

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:54 (twenty-one years ago)

is it unreasonable to want to know what his weight was as of one month before the start date of his experiment?

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:56 (twenty-one years ago)

It's got "special sauce" not mayo. And if it is just as bad than why did they feel the need to misrepresent what he eats?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:57 (twenty-one years ago)

No, it's not unreasonable. But it doesn't mean he misrepresented his weight either.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 04:57 (twenty-one years ago)

what is special sauce? does it have mayo in it? i've never had a big mac.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I WILL NOT HAVE ANY MAYO DEFAMATION ON THIS THREAD!

QUOTATIONS FROM CHAIRMAN MAYO (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the "special sauce" is more akin to tartar.

QUOTATIONS FROM CHAIRMAN TOO MUCH YAYO (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:04 (twenty-one years ago)

The Big Mac® has "Big Mac® Sauce" which includes the following:

Big Mac® Sauce: Soybean oil, pickles, distilled vinegar, water, egg yolks, high fructose corn syrup, sugar, onion powder, corn syrup, spice and spice extractives, salt, xanthan gum, mustard flour, propylene glycol alginate, sodium benzoate and potassium sorbate as preservatives, mustard bran, garlic powder, hydrolyzed (corn gluten, wheat, and soy) proteins, caramel color, extractives of paprika, turmeric, calcium disodium EDTA to protect flavor.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I think potassium sorbate might be one of the chemicals I cover.

QUOTATIONS FROM THE CHEMICAL MARKET REPORTER UNDERGROUND (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Their mayonnaise has:

Soybean oil, whole eggs, egg yolks, vinegar, water, salt, sugar, mustard flour, lemon juice concentrate, calcium disodium EDTA to protect flavor.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Well ideally I would hope everyone would read a lot more on the subject (cuz there sure is a lot more out there) but I think the film largely has its heart largely in the right place.

That's the thing, while watching it I felt like Spurlock was constantly elbowing me with frat-boy glee as he made fun of the fat people. He wasn't direct about it, but I couldn't help but notice every time he held the camera on obese McDonald's workers or went out of his way to point out that the fly-over states were the fattest.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:09 (twenty-one years ago)

He did mention the Texas thing A LOT.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:10 (twenty-one years ago)

"We need more special sauce! Leave this mayonnaise out in the sun!"

Nate in ST.P (natedetritus), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Q: I'm watching my fat intake. Can I still eat at McDonald's?

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:18 (twenty-one years ago)

You do all know that Everything sold at McDonald's is a soy product, right?

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:18 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost, whenever I eat at McDonald's (in an airport or on the road or something), I only get the chicken McGrill with no mayo and small fries (those f*cking things are great - I don't care that they're an entirely soy based product!)

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:20 (twenty-one years ago)

"methods could, with special approval, include mayo deprivation, mayo exposure to extremes of cold and heat..."

whoops, wrong thread!

QUOTATIONS FROM MAJOR GENERAL GEOFFREY MAYOMILLER (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Has there been any proof of that? I heard the soy talk was actually a rumor in the end.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:21 (twenty-one years ago)

(shhh, I created the rumor, shhhhh)

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Twice = A LOT?

I didn't see the frat-boy glee thing. I didn't think the movie was cruel towards overweight people (except for that poor girl who they interviewed, but I didn't feel it was mean to her because she was overweight, more cruel for her that this interview that she probably gave somewhat thoughtlessly will probably end up haunting her.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Twice = A LOT?

more than twice.

I didn't see the frat-boy glee thing.

shall i reopen the wesley willis thread?

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:28 (twenty-one years ago)

also, it spotlighted freaks, saying "hey, look at the freaks!" without acknowledging that well yes, they're just that, freaks. when i namechecked springer above, that's what i meant.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:31 (twenty-one years ago)

He did the fly-over thing twice and focused on Texas pretty heavily both times. Not surprising given a) regional obesity trends and b) the # of times he was asked to supersize meals there (almost half.)

I don't see the Wesley Willis thing at all. Did he post on the thread?

Who other than the big mac guy and Spurlock himself (both of whom I think are PRETTY clearly labeled as such) in that movie was a freak?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:32 (twenty-one years ago)

He did the fly-over thing twice and focused on Texas pretty heavily both times. Not surprising given a) regional obesity trends and b) the # of times he was asked to supersize meals there (almost half.)

How many McDonald's are there in Texas and did he go to them all? No, he only went to a tiny handful. I don't know how representative his super size experience was of ALL the McDonald's chains in Texas and it's probably unfair to base his argument on the four or five that asked him if he wanted fries with that.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:39 (twenty-one years ago)

He only went to a TINY handful of McDonald's ANYWHERE!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 05:40 (twenty-one years ago)

i am NOT spending 9.50 to see this guy eat micky deez

Pablo Cruise (chaki), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 06:16 (twenty-one years ago)

best movie about hamburgers:
http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images/movie/coverv/60/206460.jpg

Pablo Cruise (chaki), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 06:20 (twenty-one years ago)

cover connection:
http://goodbadugly.coldfusionvideo.com/Chairman.jpg

Pablo Cruise (chaki), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 06:22 (twenty-one years ago)

and to being it back on topic:
http://pacrimmarketing.com/newsimages/382mcjoy.jpg

Pablo Cruise (chaki), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 06:28 (twenty-one years ago)

i think everyone in the world realizes mcdonalds is too large and too far gone within its buisness practices to even start to point out whats wrong with it so making a movie about how sucky the food is is just as obvious as making a movie about fucked up the bush family is (michaelmoore).

Pablo Cruise (chaki), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 06:32 (twenty-one years ago)

b-b-but isn't it s'posed to be entertaining?

I haven't seen it yet, but it's on the longish short list. But my friends who have seen it liked it because they thought it was kinda funny. Nobody's come back for it all charged up about the evils of McDonald's or whatever. My major disappointment with the movie will be if it bores me. If I want to learn about nutrition, I have lots of other options.

(and yes, being "entertainment" doesn't excuse it from being responsible, but I think first-person stunt documentaries legitimately have more leeway than, say, 60 Minutes investigations)

spittle (spittle), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 06:46 (twenty-one years ago)

(and yes, being "entertainment" doesn't excuse it from being responsible, but I think first-person stunt documentaries legitimately have more leeway than, say, 60 Minutes investigations)

if they're straight-to-video then yes, but look at the attention this is getting. the media isn't writing this off as "some stunt movie," even though it's really just some "don't try this at home" jackass shit padded out to movie length with man-on-the-street interviews.

anyway, pablo cruise's first post otm.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 12:16 (twenty-one years ago)

This thread is making me hungry for a burger (not a McDonald's burger, but a GOOD burger).

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 13:13 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/dispatch/2003-05-23/screens_set7-1.jpg

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 13:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Yep, I would have been disappointed if that hadn't been posted.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 13:18 (twenty-one years ago)

The Temple of Vigoda
Will fall before
This black wind calls my name to you
No more

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 13:24 (twenty-one years ago)

hstencil (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 13:25 (twenty-one years ago)

That Vigoda needs mayo.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)

+ = an image even I don't wanna think about.

QUOTATIONS FROM CHAIRMAN MAYO (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 13:30 (twenty-one years ago)

And yet you claim to love mayo.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 13:35 (twenty-one years ago)

There's love and then there's depravity.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 13:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Ned OTM. Also, I never claimed love, just like.

QUESTIONS FROM THURMAN MUNSON (hstencil), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 13:36 (twenty-one years ago)

"if they're straight-to-video then yes, but look at the attention this is getting. the media isn't writing this off as "some stunt movie," even though it's really just some "don't try this at home" jackass shit padded out to movie length with man-on-the-street interviews."

See this is bullshit, too, and it makes me wonder if you've even seen the movie.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I haven't seen the movie; that's why I've spent most of this thread describing it in great detail. Whatever... I'm kinda talked out on this for now.

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 15:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought it was fine. I liked it much more than I expected to. He came across as fairly genuine throughout. His weight gain was exorbiant and that wasn't really the whole point of the film. The point was the early indocterination of bad, crappy fast food into american eating habits and how that can have detrimental effects on peoples' health. It wasn't a 60 minutes special but I thought it was less manipulative and phony than Michael Moore, certainly. Alex OTM that the stuff about school lunches was the most disturbing part.

kyle (akmonday), Sunday, 23 May 2004 06:12 (twenty-one years ago)

I meant "his weight gain *wasn't* exorbiant" up above (considering he probably totally cut out an exercise routine). The stuff quote above re: his fasting before hand is bullshit, you always have to fast one day before taking blood tests. I doubt this would have any effect on his weight three weeks down the line.

kyle (akmonday), Sunday, 23 May 2004 06:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I had a big mac earlier today.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 23 May 2004 08:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Anyway, what Dan has said throughout this thread is OTM.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 23 May 2004 08:23 (twenty-one years ago)

so much for him being in their pocket:

'Super Size Me' Gets Downsized by MTV

Wed May 26, 7:14 PM ET

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Film documentary "Super Size Me," a critical look at the health impact of a fast-food only diet, has been downsized at cable network MTV which has refused to air advertisements for the film, its distributors said on Wednesday.

Roadside Attractions and Samuel Goldwyn Films said in a statement the cable TV channel targeted to young audiences has told them the ads are "disparaging to fast food restaurants."

The distributors said MTV sister network VH1 was planning to use clips from the movie in a program called "Best Week Ever," but the clips were pulled before the show aired.

An MTV spokeswoman was not immediately available to comment. MTV and VH1 are owned by media giant Viacom Inc, which depends on advertising for a major portion of revenues.

For "Super Size Me," director Morgan Spurlock ate nothing but food from McDonald's restaurants over 30-day period, and if asked whether he wanted the larger, "supersize" meal, he always said yes.

Over the month, he gains weight and his health declines. Documenting the impact are not only the cameras but also his doctors. Spurlock mixes in various facts and figures about food and dieting as he travels the United States talking to health and food experts in 20 cities.

In March, McDonald's said it would eliminate its supersize menu options by year end. At that time, a company spokeswoman said the decision was unrelated to the movie.

"Super Size Me" has been a hit at box offices, and it earned Spurlock the Grand Jury Prize for best documentary director at this year's Sundance Film Festival.

The film began playing in theaters about two weeks ago and rose to No. 10 on domestic theater box office charts this past week. It has grossed $2.9 million in ticket sales -- a hit for a documentary -- and last weekend scored a per screen average of $6,759, just behind No. 2 film "Troy" with $7,014.

The film expands to 165 screens from 148 for the upcoming Memorial Day Holiday weekend, which the MTV ads had been timed to promote, a spokesman for the distributors said.

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 27 May 2004 04:23 (twenty-one years ago)

so much for him being in their pocket

Better recheck your rush to judgment

But an MTV spokeswoman disputed IDP's version of the events. The channel did initially suggest some edits for the spot, according to a spokeswoman, but ultimately accepted the original version.

By MTV's account, IDP then withdrew the commercial, "and instead of submitting the commercial, they chose to put out a press release."

"IDP, Samuel Goldwyn, Roadside Attractions and our advertising agency were never informed that the ads were approved," Millard countered. "I've got the correspondence from them -- an e-mail that says they wouldn't run it without changes. Now that we've gone out with our story, they're changing their tune and saying they approved the ad, but we were never notified."

MTV also denied IDP's claim that the commercial was nixed out of concern for other fast-food advertisers. "The edits were not about conflicting with other advertisers," an MTV spokeswoman said. "It was about the content of the advertisements."

The content MTV initially found objectionable in the "Super Size Me" commercial was a shot of Spurlock vomiting after ingesting a hamburger and a reference that Spurlock makes about how the hamburger could "kill."

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:48 (twenty-one years ago)

a ha! the plot sickens...

hstencil (hstencil), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:51 (twenty-one years ago)

enh. saw the flick on tuesday. had a few good points, but the guy's wannabe Michael Moore stylings pissed me off.

Kingfish Disraeli (Kingfish), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)

two weeks pass...
more controversy, this time from down under:

McDonald's in Australia Bites Back at Film
Tue Jun 15, 8:17 AM ET

By JAMIE TARABAY, Associated Press Writer

SYDNEY, Australia - McDonald's took its beef with a documentary maker who criticizes the fast food giant to Australian television screens Tuesday in a nationwide campaign biting back at suggestions its food is unhealthy.

In "Super Size Me," New York documentary maker Morgan Spurlock eats only McDonald's fare for 30 days, and in the end piles on 25 pounds and gets sick.

The film grossed the highest ever opening weekend takings for a documentary in Australia, taking $242,600 in four days on 26 screens. The previous record holder was Michael Moore's "Bowling for Columbine."

McDonald's Australian arm — which already has nutritional information printed on all its food packaging and sells a range of salads at its network of stores — hit back quickly.

"We did some research with our customers, and because of the fact that we were silent in regards to the film, they took it that our silence basically meant guilt," Guy Russo, McDonald's chief executive in Australia, told Sky News television Tuesday. "I think he's providing false claims to Australians ... I won't take that sitting down."

In its new campaign, McDonald's attacks Spurlock's film as being "about someone who decides to overeat."

Russo appears in the ads himself, targeting Spurlock's claim that eating nothing by McDonald's for 30 days can make you sick.

"You're right," Russo says in the commercial. "Surprise, surprise. He finds out it was an error. I could have told him that."

McDonald's has revamped its junk food image around the world, launching healthy alternatives to the burger meals that have made it a restaurant icon. It added lowfat milk, apple juice and sliced fresh apples to its menus in the United States. It also introduced Happy Meal options like Fish McDippers in Japan and sliced fruit in the United Kingdom.

In Australia, Macca's, as it is commonly known, introduced salads and yoghurts and muffins about 18 months ago. It is also one of a few national food companies that lists nutritional contents of each meal on food wrappers and on posters in the restaurants.

Russo said he eats at McDonald's about three times a week, but he would never overdo it, like he insists Spurlock did for his film.

"I'm of Italian descent," Russo says, "and I couldn't eat spaghetti Bolognese every day."

Two interesting things to note, which the reporter of this piece missed: McDonald's current CEO is Australian (posted upthread: McDonald's new CEO has colorectal cancer. Of course, this is the guy who is the replacement for the CEO who died of a heart attack last month.). Also, Russo's last line "I couldn't eat spaghetti Bolognese every day" is mind-bogglingly stupid.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 15 June 2004 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)

It would have been really great if this thread had been a discussion about the film istead of a bunch of people saying "I didn't see the film, but if it's what I think it is then..."

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 21 June 2004 02:42 (twenty-one years ago)

It would have been really great if this thread had been a discussion about the film istead of a bunch of people saying "I didn't see the film, but if it's what I think it is then..."

FWIW, I did see the film.

Spurlock was interviewed on The Daily Show a couple weeks ago and when Stewart asked him why he made the film, Spurlock replied "Because obesity is funny" and that pretty much sums up the film and his attitude.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Monday, 21 June 2004 03:33 (twenty-one years ago)

New Happy Meal Choices

McDonald's new Happy Meal Choices give children and their parents the opportunity to mix and match traditional Happy Meal favorites like French fries and soft drinks with New Happy Meal Choices: Apple Dippers (fresh, peeled apple slices) served with a low fat caramel dipping sauce, and new beverage choices including 100% pure Minute Maid® apple juice and 1% low fat white and chocolate Milk Jugs.

http://www.mcdonalds.com/usa/ronald/happy/newchoices.html

stockholm cindy (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 22 June 2004 00:35 (twenty-one years ago)

three months pass...
I saw this last night. Although distracted by Spurlock's truly awful moustache, I did form some impressions. My feeling was that it's silly to question the validity of his experiment, because it wasn't really an experiment. It was a conceit, a framing device for a not-entirely-serious documentary about McDonalds.

The focus by Spurlock on himself was both a weakness and a strength - it's what makes the film less dry that a straight documentary and it's also what makes it seem subjective and flawed. Which is obviously Michael Moore all over again, except much much less irritating.

The message seemed to me NOT redundant - yes people know that McDs is bad for you but they really really don't know HOW bad. I mean, the DOCTORS didn't even know. I was shocked when they laid out all the sugar he'd eaten etc, as I was meant to be obviously. Maybe people aren't eating McDs exactly as Spurlock did, but some are not far off, and for a whole lifetime not just a month.

That said, I do wonder if this film isn't preaching to the converted a bit... but maybe it doesn't matter. He's not trying to change America (or if he is then he's rubbish at it), he's trying to make a point.

I didn't notice obese people being mocked. I did notice that some of the other vox pops seemed specifically chosen because they were 'funny' though, and I could have done without that.

The stuff about the school meals made my heart hurt, and not just from the thought of all that cholesterol. How sad and frustrating that a healthy meals service might be available and no more expensive, but the soda and candy companies etc are doing everything they can to block schools taking this option. How wrong that they have that power. Yes, adults should of course take responsibility for their eating. But McDonalds and the rest are very deliberately, very consciously, making it a lot harder for people to do that, by pulling them in as children. The lawyer guy was OTM pointing out how all the play areas and free toys and stuff can hardly fail to produce warm and cosy associations that persist into adulthood. (And I must say I warmed to Spurlock when he then deadpanned that he was going to punch his kid in the face each time they drove past a McDonalds, ha.)


Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 12:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Ha ha! Dan Perry must be a fat git and, if he's not, he obviously does not know of the damage chains like Burger King do to the environment and their treatment of livestock. Besides, 3 times a week? Shit your insides must look like crap. What it is doing INSIDE you is another matter. Yuck. Plus, these conglomorates are globalised specks on the landscape. Who wants fucking Coca-Cola colonilisation anyway?

haha, Wednesday, 22 September 2004 12:12 (twenty-one years ago)

I will now apologise for reviving this thread.

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 12:15 (twenty-one years ago)

This is excellent. MORE HATERS I THRIVE ON YOU.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 12:19 (twenty-one years ago)

U will be suffering from heart disease at 57 you fat git. Ha ha!

The film is CLASSIC. Fuck McDonalds. Shitty unhealthy food that targets those on low wages and young impressionable kids. They build their stupid golden arches everywhere too, and buy out other eating places at service stations etc so you're left with no other option. Fuck them and shitty Burger King.

Haha, Wednesday, 22 September 2004 12:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Is that all you've got? Can't you come up with something original or do you guys get a special pamphlet that outlines your acceptable anonymous attacks against strangers who have nothing to do with you?

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 12:31 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm going to die at 57 with heart disease too. either that or liver failure. or lung cancer.

i've been having mcdonald's breakfast meal three times a week pretty much too. and KFC on some of the days. i'm quite woefully under weight. maybe i have worms (but surely they'd be dying of heart diseases themselves too or do worms have hearts??). but yeah i doubt many people really have mcdonalds for EVERY MEAL.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 12:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Shitty unhealthy food that targets those on low wages

are you KIDDING???

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 12:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I think they target everybody seeing as that would make them more money (ie, they have more than one marketing strategy) but hey, tell me more about how fat I am.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 12:33 (twenty-one years ago)

sheesh, if it isn't the wife calling you a sociopath, it's total strangers criticizing your eaing habits... and don't mget me started on your dress sense.

i thought this was a good 90 mins' edutainment.

HKM, Wednesday, 22 September 2004 12:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Are you fat Dan? I'm partial to the odd McDonalds myself but it only satisfies an immediate craving, it doesn't really fill you up.

Of course it is unhealthy, but come on! I live in the West of Scotland - Heart Attack capital of Europe, Sick Man of Europe etc etc. Every town has a chip shop, every trading estate has a burger van, every canteen sells pies.... We choose to eat deep fried pizzas, we know these foodstuffs are dripping with fat, and we know the dangers.

If you don't like it don't eat it. If you don't want your kids eating it - try keeping an eye on them. Have proper mealtimes for them! talk about your day round the dinner table!

People are too reticent to take the blame themselves.

Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Are you fat Dan?

No! I'm not emaciated but there's kind of no way on Earth I could be called fat (what with the 32-inch waist and all).

I freely admit to being out of shape, though.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)

one problem with the film was the conservative assumption that we should all have healthy home-cooked meals like when mums didn't work (as i doubt spurlock's did), and the concomitant idea that home cooking *is* healthy. of course, much of the stuff people do eat at home -- diet food, ready-meals, microwave meals -- is complete shit.

HKM, Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)

haha OTM - i cook at home all the time but i actually have a pot of MSG next to the cooker.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)

As I said, McDonalds is a choice. Just like a deep fried mars bar is a choice. They are not forced upon us.
Choose to smoke, choose not to smoke. Choose to ride a motorbike, choose not to ride a motorbike. It's easy really, I think it's called free will.

Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:14 (twenty-one years ago)

up to a point -- there are a lot of cultural things you can say that about, and i'm not buying it. i don't think free will is a total delusion, but -- well the choice of cigs was a bad idea. they're addictive! as is McDs, some say.

HKM, Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah OTM. I mean, I eat healthier at home than when I'm out (and Spurlock obviously does too) but that doesn't mean everyone does/would. I do think family mealtimes are potentially great and very important lessons can be learned there, but what are you gonna do, turn back the clock to the 1950s and FORCE parents (ie mothers) to cook three meals from scratch every day?

xpost

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Rumpy, just because we have free choice, does that mean that it's not necessary to scrutinise companies like McDonalds who wield such a lot of power?

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Clearly not, but at the same time that doesn't mean that said scrutiny automatically abdicates people from personal responsibility.
The fact that it's "mostly" McDonald's fault doesn't mean it isn't also "partly" the consumers' fault.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh agreed. I don't know if it's even 'mostly'. I just think that the factors *influencing* our choices are interesting and potentially disturbing.

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I completely agree with that.

Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)

The ginger headed clown doesn't influence my decisions any more than the giant pirate outside the chip shop, or the huge plastic ice cream cone outside the sweet shop.

Of course McDonalds is a huge company which carries a lot of clout, but there are plenty of people who for some reason don't fall under it's magic spell.

Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)

i want to stop eating it

teh pow! (blueski), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:43 (twenty-one years ago)

you want to stop lovin' it

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Is the temptation too great? I'm getting terrible cravings for a Big Mac meal and a cheeseburger now....

Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Wednesday, 22 September 2004 13:46 (twenty-one years ago)

four years pass...

RIP waistline of 5 years ago ;_;

(NB: I eat less fast food now than I did 5 years ago)

nosotros niggamos (HI DERE), Tuesday, 3 February 2009 18:51 (seventeen years ago)

Haha has had his revenge. That was probably Calum?

Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 3 February 2009 18:55 (seventeen years ago)

Haha maybe!

I just realized I'm complaining because I've gone from a 32 to a 34 so maybe I should shut up.

nosotros niggamos (HI DERE), Tuesday, 3 February 2009 18:56 (seventeen years ago)

It's when your waist exceeds your inside leg measurement that the problems really start...

snoball, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 19:50 (seventeen years ago)

did anyone see the horrible osama doc he made

s1ocki, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 19:53 (seventeen years ago)

He's gotten significantly less charming over the years.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 19:54 (seventeen years ago)

He was charming at one point?

i'm shy (Abbott), Tuesday, 3 February 2009 20:12 (seventeen years ago)

when he was almost dying from mcdonald's food

as much dandelion as you can put in there (latebloomer), Tuesday, 3 February 2009 20:14 (seventeen years ago)

He was channeling the Grimace!

i'm shy (Abbott), Tuesday, 3 February 2009 20:16 (seventeen years ago)

two months pass...

he lost me at "Mac Shacks"

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 08:31 (sixteen years ago)

his girlfriend is so annnoying!!!

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 08:33 (sixteen years ago)

i am not cut out for this movie maybe. i hate to listen to and watch people eat, let alone kiss a burger before biting into it

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 08:49 (sixteen years ago)

who kisses a burger irl

Phillip That That That BIG-HOOS!!! (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Sunday, 5 April 2009 08:53 (sixteen years ago)

ok and vomiting

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 08:55 (sixteen years ago)

and to top it all, a jared fogle cameo

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 08:59 (sixteen years ago)

this movie always seemed so gross to me

i think mermaids are real (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 5 April 2009 09:01 (sixteen years ago)

i mean of course the point is mcdonalds is gross but the whole thing is just leaving me thinking NO, YOU ARE GROSS!!!

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 09:36 (sixteen years ago)

admittedly i am feeling pretty froggy

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 09:36 (sixteen years ago)

mcfroggy

i think mermaids are real (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 5 April 2009 09:37 (sixteen years ago)

hey dude why dont u harass a lunchlady

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 10:29 (sixteen years ago)

i do ilke "strung out on ham" though

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 10:40 (sixteen years ago)

in sum: DNW this movie, but rereading the Old Testament part of this thread: DNW that even more

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 11:56 (sixteen years ago)

<3

light turns red *hardy neanderthal guffaw* (latebloomer), Sunday, 5 April 2009 14:14 (sixteen years ago)

McDud

Nurse Detrius (Eric H.), Sunday, 5 April 2009 14:30 (sixteen years ago)

The part on school lunch programs and gym cuts is just fucking horrifying.

This is the only remotely interesting part of the movie and it's so frustrating that it's not delved into at length.

Nurse Detrius (Eric H.), Sunday, 5 April 2009 14:31 (sixteen years ago)

sequel didn't get enough love

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1111833/

Just one thing I was thinking about as I was getting on the copter (J0hn D.), Sunday, 5 April 2009 14:55 (sixteen years ago)

will watch

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)

will direct and star in part III

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Sunday, 5 April 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)

super high me was lolsome, especially the weed-based "church" dude visits.

light turns red *hardy neanderthal guffaw* (latebloomer), Sunday, 5 April 2009 23:36 (sixteen years ago)

I thought the gym cuts part was alarmist, but I think gym in general is overrated. Maybe it's different for kids who grow up in cities, but I definitely got more exercise playing outside on my own time as a kid than in gym class, and I am quite unconvinced that it's our only bulwark against THE PLAGUE OF OBESITY, especially given how easy it is to stand around and do nothing. I had to spend a full 10% of my hours in high school in gym class, which was twice the state requirement, and they increased it the year after I graduated. And when you keep in mind that lunch hour took up the same amount of time...that's a lot of time not spent studying. But hey, it's a public health issue, so we can definitely prioritize it over funding arts education or improving academic offerings, right?

I can't disagree about the school lunches being really unhealthy, but I sort of feel like their treatment was missing part of the point too. When Spurlock was pointing out the girls eating only french fries and a coke, I thought the french fries being available wasn't the only problem, the fact that the girls were limiting themselves to ONLY french fries was another. Offering only apples instead of fries would mean they'd eat only an apple for lunch. Teenage girls freak out about what they eat, and obesity prevention should not be the main focus of what we're trying to pass on through schools. (In general, I didn't like the tone the film took toward obesity. I was horrified by the interview with the person (doctor?) who said we should be able to publically scold and humiliate fat people the way we do smokers. I don't even think it's polite to do that to smokers.)

Ok, just watched that yesterday! Good to get it off my chest.

Maria, Monday, 6 April 2009 00:21 (sixteen years ago)

well to be fair that doctor did say that he felt "fuck you" was an appropriate response to someone publically scolding a smoker

WHO DEY and the blowfish (roxymuzak), Monday, 6 April 2009 00:29 (sixteen years ago)

DUD

Someone Still Loves You Evan and Jaron (Tape Store), Monday, 6 April 2009 00:52 (sixteen years ago)

fifteen years pass...

RIP Morgan Spurlock

Cemetry Gaetz (DJP), Friday, 24 May 2024 15:24 (one year ago)

https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/24/entertainment/morgan-spurlock-death?cid=ios_app

Cemetry Gaetz (DJP), Friday, 24 May 2024 15:25 (one year ago)

I was reading just yesterday about how the liver damage he had at the end of Super Size Me was likely due to to alcoholism - he confessed to being an alcoholic for 20 years in his metoo statement, but says he's tee-total in the documentary

This is Dance Anthems, have some respect (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Friday, 24 May 2024 15:34 (one year ago)

yeah a lot of shady shit surrounding this guy, think he did try to change at the end though

frogbs, Friday, 24 May 2024 17:27 (one year ago)

interesting to see this upthread:

The part on school lunch programs and gym cuts is just fucking horrifying.

This is the only remotely interesting part of the movie and it's so frustrating that it's not delved into at length.

― Nurse Detrius (Eric H.), Sunday, April 5, 2009 9:31 AM (fifteen years ago) bookmarkflaglink

fun fact: my grandparents were actually kind of involved in this, they ran a citywide program once to swap out school lunches with healthy food from their bakery and then studied what happened to the kids test scores and attention spans, they got the results they were looking for and it became a big news story for us in the 90s, and as a result there was a lot of stuff involving them that was filmed for the movie. my grandpa bought a bunch of tickets for family and friends to see this on opening night only to see nearly all of it had been cut, outside of one phone call I think

I also liked this post:

mcfroggy

frogbs, Friday, 24 May 2024 17:30 (one year ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.