Fucking BNP. I bet they get votes as well the bastards.
― CRW (CRW), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― CRW (CRW), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― CRW (CRW), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― CRW (CRW), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:47 (twenty-one years ago)
HAHAHA THEM BNP SCUMS ARE TAKING OVER OUR COUNTRY!! OUR JOBS!!! MARRYING OUR WIMMIN!!!! KICK THEM BNPS OUT OF MY COUNTRY!
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:51 (twenty-one years ago)
HAHAHA THEM TROLLS ARE INVADING OUR MESSAGE BOARD!!! TAKING OVER OUR BANDWIDTH!!! MARRYING OUR WIMMIN!!!! KICK THEM TROLLS OUT OF MY BOARD!
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:57 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm bothered by the BNP (who are also anti-women and have jumped on this "rights for fathers" thing to try and promote their own bigotry towards single mothers).
sounds like something a BNP would say about a muslim.
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 10:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:09 (twenty-one years ago)
P.S. SNP is hardly a racist party.
― CRW (CRW), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― CRW (CRW), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― CRW (CRW), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:16 (twenty-one years ago)
But I'm not sure SNP voters are anti-English any more than Tory voters are anti-Scottish (though I'd say that Tory voters have invariably never been outside Southern England).
― CRW (CRW), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:19 (twenty-one years ago)
Calum, if you're not happy about the BNP standing, vote against them and encourage others to vote against them. Stop ranting like a Daily Mail editorial.
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:20 (twenty-one years ago)
100% OTM there, barry!!
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:22 (twenty-one years ago)
I recall reading a single article some years ago about how there was severe colour-of-skin based racism in Scotland, both in the cities and outside them. Its argument was that it wasn't spoken about because no-one wanted to make a noise about it esp since the people who might have made a noise about it are happy with the image of Scotland as a sound left-leaning country. But I've never seen anything similar since, was it a load of made-up nonsense?
― Tim (Tim), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:23 (twenty-one years ago)
you should take a look at the stats before making such general assumptions, the north of england, particularly areas of the north west, was, and in parts still is, a bastion of support for the tories.
― Vicky (Vicky), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:36 (twenty-one years ago)
well that's all of us screwed, then
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:44 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.glasgowsurvival.co.uk/
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:47 (twenty-one years ago)
??
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:51 (twenty-one years ago)
the main problem is that you can never get rid of the bubbles.
― Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 11:58 (twenty-one years ago)
I think the asylum seekers being shipped into Sighthill awakened a lot of latent racism, but the folk who live there are of the poor giro-class pack mentality anyway.
― Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:03 (twenty-one years ago)
Apart from Asian families there was very little variety of cultures where I was brought up, certainly no West-Indian, African or Eastern European people. I felt a total hick on my first Southbound Victoria-Line train journey after moving to London and I kinda realised that the geographical seperation of my childhood was a total petri-dish for that evil, almost casual half-hearted regionalism and racism that stinks up many Scottish peoples attitudes.
― mzui, Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:07 (twenty-one years ago)
Unfortunately it's comments like these which make "the folk who live there" into racists.
― Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:11 (twenty-one years ago)
The procurator-fiscal's office in Glasgow is now studying the leaflets.
The BNP said it was free to distribute what it claimed was factual material and argued that there was nothing in the literature which broke the law.
The BNP, like many political parties, is distributing election material across Scotland in the run-up to the European elections on 10 June.
Examining material
The Glasgow charity, Positive Action in Housing, said it had received 55 complaints about the leaflets, which show a Union Flag being burnt by men of Arab extraction above claims of an "asylum time bomb".
Strathclyde Police said they had brought the matter to the attention of the procurator fiscal, who is examining the material and considering an investigation.
It is thought that other fiscals in Scotland may soon follow suit.
Solicitor advocate Gerry Brown said that the leaflets could contravene laws on inciting racial hatred or simply cause such alarm or distress that they committed a breach the peace.
I think this is a total waste of police time and a big fuss about nothing
Steve BlakeBNP
He said: "I would have thought that with something as important as this - with the impact on local communities - it is almost certain that the procurator fiscal's office in Glasgow will refer the enquiries and reports to the Lord Advocate in Edinburgh."
One woman who received the leaflet told BBC Scotland: "I was almost too upset to read it. I was very shocked and felt it was an incitement to racial hatred."
The woman complained to her local mail sorting office who told her that, due to election communication, no-one could prevent the leaflet from being posted.
Kay Hampton, of the Commission for Racial Equality in Scotland, encouraged people to report to the police any materials which "appear to encourage racial hatred".
'Fear and anxiety'
She added: "Elections should be a time for the fullest debate of the issues faced by people across Scotland, but that debate should be informed by fact and directed towards solutions.
"It should not be an occasion for peddling prejudice and stirring up and exploiting fear and anxiety."
The BNP's Steve Blake said there was nothing in the leaflet which broke the law.
"I think this is a total waste of police time," he went on.
"The material was given the OK by our team of legal experts so to be honest, I think this is a big fuss about nothing.
"We are clear that we do not advocate any kind of violent attack on anybody simply because of who they are.
"The majority of people who are in the BNP and the vast majority of people who plan to vote for us, are law abiding, decent, hard-working British people."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/3752615.stm
― Newshound, Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:13 (twenty-one years ago)
P.S. Marcello OTM.
― CRW (CRW), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Be sure to Loop! Loop, Loop, Loop. (ex machina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:18 (twenty-one years ago)
haha have you been to london lately crw?
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:19 (twenty-one years ago)
I wasn't talking about London tho', you can't put a frame around racist people and say that Stoke is more racist that Dundee etc.
X-post Pashmina
― mzui, Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:20 (twenty-one years ago)
YOu might as well Google for that if you really want to photoshop 'ILX' in place of 'BNP' on whatever you find know
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Be sure to Loop! Loop, Loop, Loop. (ex machina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:26 (twenty-one years ago)
El partido homologo al BNP en España, Democracia Nacional, hace un llamamiento a todos los Británicos que residan en España para que apoyen con su voto al BNP en las Elecciones Europeas. Democracia Nacional considera que el BNP es el único partido que defenderá los derechos de los británicos en Europa.
De igual modo, desde el BNP hacemos un llamamiento similar a todos los españoles que residan en Gran Bretaña, y por extensión, a todos los españoles que lean este comunicado (cualquiera que sea su lugar de residencia). Te pedimos el voto para Democracia Nacional, para que pueda luchar por la identidad, cultura e independencia española y europea.
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:27 (twenty-one years ago)
ENVIRONMENT - NO to pollution!Our ideal for Britain is that of a clean, beautiful country, free of pollution in all its forms. We will enforce standards to curb those practices, whether by business or the individual, which cause environmental damage. “The polluter pays to clean up the mess” must become a fact of life, not an electioneering slogan. In towns we would work to replace the brutalist modernism of 1960s-style-architecture with a blend of traditional local styles and materials and a more human scale.
Our ideal for Britain is that of a clean, beautiful country, free of pollution in all its forms. We will enforce standards to curb those practices, whether by business or the individual, which cause environmental damage. “The polluter pays to clean up the mess” must become a fact of life, not an electioneering slogan. In towns we would work to replace the brutalist modernism of 1960s-style-architecture with a blend of traditional local styles and materials and a more human scale.
What should I read between the lines here?
― Be sure to Loop! Loop, Loop, Loop. (ex machina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Be sure to Loop! Loop, Loop, Loop. (ex machina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)
sorry, but I've come to hate the economies of presumption and condescension built into, unleashed and galvanised by the phrase 'ned'.
― cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)
i think he preferred it in the 1850s
Hongroism?Oi?
― Be sure to Loop! Loop, Loop, Loop. (ex machina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:31 (twenty-one years ago)
"Charchill! Charchill! With his cigars and his rotten paintings, rotten paintings! He couldn't even say Nazi, he would say Naaaaazzzzzzzii. We wasn't Naaaaazzzzis, we was Nazis!!!!!"
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:53 (twenty-one years ago)
Also an old n yorks. term for "lad", polari for "fucking".
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― ned (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:55 (twenty-one years ago)
Our ideal for Britain is that of a clean, beautiful country, free of pollution in all its forms - be the those forms oil, litter or asylum seekers.
We will enforce standards to curb those practices, whether by business or the individual, which cause environmental damage. “The polluter pays to clean up the mess” must become a fact of life, not an electioneering slogan. - The polluter here is refered to as an "other" and thus not a core member of the BNP support. Hence will be equated with those groups the BNP is again. (Note use of fascist friendly enforce here as well, with its attendant enforcers).
In towns we would work to replace the brutalist modernism of 1960s-style-architecture - associated with inner city council estates associated with ethnic minorities. Modernism is juxtaposed against traditional values, and tied here to the 1960's a period of large immigration and therefore a bad thing.
with a blend of traditional local styles and materials and a more human scale. Local -not foreign, hence understood by a local workforce. Human scale housing = traditional British family units, not accomodating alternative lifestyles or extended family living. Human scale can also be juxtaposed against the "masses" which are threatening the British way of life et al.
― Pete (Pete), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Thursday, 27 May 2004 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:00 (twenty-one years ago)
thus o.e.d.
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:37 (twenty-one years ago)
sorry to hear that, tho i wouldn't worry about people's comments on here THAT much as they don't you do they
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rumpy Pumpkin (rumpypumpkin), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― CRW (CRW), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― don (don), Thursday, 27 May 2004 13:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― CRW (CRW), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:03 (twenty-one years ago)
*find the bigotry in that, yo
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael White (Hereward), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― jesus nathalie (nathalie), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:17 (twenty-one years ago)
Where are they being rubbished?
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:17 (twenty-one years ago)
hatin' on the Irish now!
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:18 (twenty-one years ago)
I tremble! (Though not so much, based on who started the thread anyway.)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:28 (twenty-one years ago)
So do I, actually!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)
Flip it on its head - if I were to go "I've just been beaten up by a big gang of black scum", would you lavish me with sympathy and ignore my language or call me out on it? They may be a) black and b) scumbags but that doesn't wash away the negative connotations, does it? Bigotry begets bigotry, even among 'liberals'.
I'm not sure what use me going "aww, that's rough" is, for anyone really.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)
If there were people flinging around nasty racial abuse or threatening violence on this board they would get one thousand times the amount of stick Rumpy Pumpkin got above for one innocently meant if ill-advised phrase and well you know it.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)
Is what I should have said.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 27 May 2004 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 27 May 2004 15:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Thursday, 27 May 2004 15:08 (twenty-one years ago)
i think semantics of what is a ned and confronting drug etc. issues are both important. but apart from some aspects of violence and intimidation both have not a lot of relevance to the BNP?
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 15:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 15:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 27 May 2004 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― CRW (CRW), Thursday, 27 May 2004 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 27 May 2004 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 27 May 2004 15:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 27 May 2004 15:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andy Jay, Thursday, 27 May 2004 15:57 (twenty-one years ago)
Ms Kane said the word stands for a non-educated delinquent and is therefore degrading and insulting.
However, communities minister Margaret Curran accused her of focusing on "frivolities" rather than the blight of youth crime.
Ms Kane tabled a question asking the Scottish Executive to state its position on ministers using the term.
The former youth worker in the Drumchapel area of Glasgow wants the parliament to condemn its use, comparing it to ageism, racism and sexism.
Alienate youngsters
"If you were talking about any other section of society, let's say it was elderly people, and you used a derogatory term there would be an outcry," the MSP told BBC Scotland.
"Just because these young people don't have the vote and they live in some of the areas that you don't hear too much about or see too much about, it does not mean that they should not be protected in relation to language that is used against them."
The MSP has been supported by the charity Children in Scotland, which said such descriptions helped alienate youngsters from the rest of society.
Ms Kane and the charity said they were also concerned about the way young people have been portrayed recently.
Ms Curran insisted the priority of the executive was to respond to the problems encountered by communities and young people.
"I think it's much better that rather than blaming the people who use the term, you try to resolve the problem," said the communities minister.
Margaret Curran dismissed the call "With all due respect I think you have a very strange sense of priorities.
"I'm quite happy to tell my constituents, the elderly women who are mugged, the hard-pressed families whose car tyres are slashed on a regular basis, that the policy of the SSP is to say to them be careful how you describe that because you might hurt their feelings."
Ms Kane told the parliament that statistics showed youth crime had remained at the same level for a decade.
"What's happening in other debates we have heard is a generalisation against young people all over Scotland," she said.
"These same young people have been badly let down. They have been pushed to the wall for decades and some of them are now the parents of young people we are now hearing concerns about.
"That is the result of poverty."
However, Labour's Duncan McNeill said that the word ned was used to refer to young criminals rather than all young people.
'Pharmaceutical consultants'
He said: "What are we supposed to call them - the guys that hang about the streets? Tracksuit ambassadors?
"Shoplifters as retail stock relocation operatives?
"Drug dealers as independent pharmaceutical consultants? What are we to call them?"
Ms Kane replied: "To call young people neds, drug dealers, shoplifters or any other thing is a huge assumption. They are young people."
In 2001 the word ned entered the Concise Oxford Dictionary, defined as a hooligan or petty criminal, a stupid or loutish boy or man.
― Andy Jay, Thursday, 27 May 2004 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)
I seriously suggest everyone clicks that link and reads it.
― Andy Jay, Thursday, 27 May 2004 16:02 (twenty-one years ago)
Neds have as much a place in the history of British/Scottish youth culture as Mods, Rockers, Punks, Casuals, New Romantics, Indie Kids, Goths and the like - cultures which are usually typified by the clothes that they wear and the music they listen to.
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:49 (twenty-one years ago)
My daughter (12) and her friend (11) were spat at, sworn at and generally intimidated in the High Street in Edinburgh by a gang of the very type of JJB sports-wearing goons Rosie Kane is asking us to respect.
The reason for this harangue? The girls were wearing black baggy clothes and Nirvana and Foo Fighters T-shirts. "Ned" is far too polite a word for these people. Neil, Scotland
― ken c (ken c), Thursday, 27 May 2004 18:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:47 (twenty-one years ago)
sorry
― Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Thursday, 27 May 2004 19:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andy jay, Thursday, 27 May 2004 21:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― CRW (CRW), Thursday, 27 May 2004 22:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Slump Man (Slump Man), Friday, 28 May 2004 03:20 (twenty-one years ago)
Elsewhere on the thread: hey, dig DJ Martian's racist jibe at Nathalie!
nath: FYI, the BNP is our equivalent of Vlaams Blok.
― Marcello Carlin, Friday, 28 May 2004 06:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 28 May 2004 07:26 (twenty-one years ago)
Blame the parents, blame the schools, the first bit of Johnson's comment sounds suspiciously like lyrics from early nineties Fraggle bargain-binners Back to the Planet. But the second part is essentially correct imho - this is what Rosie should be concentrating on.
The argument that 'ned' is only used of poor people who are nuisances reminds me of neo-nazi's attempts to use the n-word - claiming it doesn't refer to all black people, only those who don't work or commit crime.
Oh, c'mon Kevin, that's ridiculous. The example you give abuses a whole race of ppl who had already suffered terrible oppression. You can't compare a term which is sufficiently nebulous as to lead to debate as to whether an individual belongs to the grouping or not with one which unambiguously abuses an entire racial group.
― MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 28 May 2004 07:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― charltonlido (gareth), Friday, 28 May 2004 07:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 28 May 2004 07:48 (twenty-one years ago)
One thing that strikes me about the rise of the BNP and the fall of the National Front is a play for respectability - the National Front bought out mainstream images of skinheads and graffiti on public toilets, the BNP is characterised by the suited, educated Nick Griffin who appears on Newsnight, and reports about Jewish (!) candidates.
But the refusal of mainstream Britain to accept them (BBC newsreader's faces still frown when they mention the BNP, they are only to be spoken of in a tone of high disapproval) pleases me, even if their attitudes and support are being fuelled by the same people (the Sun, the Mail, the Express) that would otherwise decry them. This strikes me as being a far greater problem - sooner or later Griffin won't be saying anything other than what you can read in any tabloid newspaper - maybe he already is.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 28 May 2004 07:57 (twenty-one years ago)
There speaks someone who has no idea what he's talking about.
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 28 May 2004 08:40 (twenty-one years ago)
Thus undermining his whole point. Twat.
It's this conflation of clothing and criminality that's where the crap starts.
Ach, I said all this already on the making fun of poor people thread.
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 May 2004 08:45 (twenty-one years ago)
Bingo!
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 28 May 2004 08:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Amos, Friday, 28 May 2004 08:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 May 2004 08:50 (twenty-one years ago)
(this isn't a rhetorical question - I'm interested)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 May 2004 08:51 (twenty-one years ago)
But there are (for instance) very very posh kids in north london who dress and act this way. I don't know if they are criminals, I expect even if they committed crimes they wouldn't be labelled criminals, unlike their working class counterparts.
― Dave Amos, Friday, 28 May 2004 08:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 28 May 2004 08:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― zappi (joni), Friday, 28 May 2004 08:59 (twenty-one years ago)
As far as I can see no one is saying that you should, other than 'labour's duncan mcneil'
― Dave Amos, Friday, 28 May 2004 09:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave Amos, Friday, 28 May 2004 09:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 28 May 2004 09:03 (twenty-one years ago)
actually, i do know what you mean, neds are kind of anti-social but not necessarily involved in crime to the extent they could be seriously labelled 'criminals'.
― Dave Amos, Friday, 28 May 2004 09:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 28 May 2004 09:12 (twenty-one years ago)
People who are playing the 'you don't know what you're talking about, you haven't lived it' card don't seem to all agree about what it means themselves, which is why I tend to find that card so lame in arguments.
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 May 2004 09:16 (twenty-one years ago)
i suppose that some people get frustrated with being told they can't use certain words by people who know very little about the culture they're trying to defend (for example that it isn't a solely working class phenom)
― Dave Amos, Friday, 28 May 2004 09:27 (twenty-one years ago)
You're right of course but I only know what it means to me and the people I grew up with - I don't think I was even aware of the term until my early teens, which is when kids start taking their separate directions in life. You know, you become a "swat" because you're good in school, he said bitterly.
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 28 May 2004 09:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 May 2004 09:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 28 May 2004 09:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 28 May 2004 09:39 (twenty-one years ago)
Really depressing.
― MikeB, Friday, 28 May 2004 09:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Friday, 28 May 2004 09:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 28 May 2004 09:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 May 2004 09:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 May 2004 09:53 (twenty-one years ago)
How do you think the working/middle (i.e. those above the criminal classes you mention) classes would react to vulnerable asylum seekers being put into "good" areas, with nice houses and gardens? The redtops would have a field day with that one. Those in Sighthill may be exhibiting a nimby mentality, but then again many the poor bastards don't even *have* back yards. It's a ridiculous area for anyone to have to live in, whether they're fleeing oppresion or not.
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 28 May 2004 09:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 May 2004 10:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Friday, 28 May 2004 10:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Friday, 28 May 2004 10:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 29 May 2004 21:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Saturday, 29 May 2004 22:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Saturday, 29 May 2004 23:06 (twenty-one years ago)
N - I might be. I dunno - I'm not proud of labelling areas or classes like that but it's been something I've noticed considerably more in 25 years of living round here.
Is it really such a leap to imagine that coupled in with the desire to move out of said urban areas is an attempt to get away from black/Asian people as much as it is an attempt to get away from all those working classes they're trying to get away from. The difference being that in all these areas - Beckenham, Bromley, I'll throw Essex in here as well, are on the outskirts of cities, on the fringe of more working-class areas like Lewisham or Walthamstow or wherever.
These areas are populated, generally speaking, by people who have moved out from their closest area of London - largely working class, largely beneficiaries of Thatcherism. So an Asian family is a symptomatic of everything my straw man trying to get away from?
This isn't to discount the fact that there are racists in Dulwich, Blackheath or Hampstead, but I've never noticed it being quite so overt as I have in, say, Bromley, where I once had to run up the high street to get away from some racist twats who tried it in a pub.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Saturday, 29 May 2004 23:27 (twenty-one years ago)
Should people feel a duty to fit into a neighbourhood? Are there 'nice' aspects of neighbourhood that rely on cultural homogenity?
― N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 30 May 2004 00:28 (twenty-one years ago)
Poach Trisha from ITV and lock her in a windowless room full of clueless council estate scumbags
This cunt Brooker better pray he never runs into me - don't try it! But seriously, this kind of repulsive snobbishness seems acceptable among the "middle classes" these days, even in a liberal rag like the Guardian. Cunts.
― Dadaismus (Dada), Sunday, 30 May 2004 07:43 (twenty-one years ago)
Unite Against Fascism - organising a nationwide campaign against the BNP around the June 10 elections ... www.uaf.org.ukLove Music Hate Racism - gigs, raves, carnivals against racism and fascism ... www.lmhr.org.uk
ta
― lee b, Sunday, 30 May 2004 11:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Sunday, 30 May 2004 11:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 30 May 2004 12:17 (twenty-one years ago)
As far as I'm aware, there is not such a surplus of accommodation in Milngavie.
― Madchen (Madchen), Sunday, 30 May 2004 14:24 (twenty-one years ago)
Madchen, it's always amazed me just how urgently needed and desirable high-rise flats suddenly become, usually by people who've turned down similar housing, when asylum seekers move into them.
― suzy (suzy), Sunday, 30 May 2004 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)
As for the Royal Mail delivering this crud, well that’s the biggest irony of all, if only they’d done that last time around!
― Plinky (Plinky), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 11:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 11:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Plinky (Plinky), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 13:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― C-Man (C-Man), Wednesday, 23 June 2004 13:23 (twenty-one years ago)
Stelfox and Mark C = perfect additions to a Calum thread
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 6 July 2007 08:50 (eighteen years ago)
Can we bump Carmody's "I was watching videos of black men being lynched the other day, and that happened to remind me of Stelfox" thread?
God I was a dick.
― Mark C, Friday, 6 July 2007 08:57 (eighteen years ago)
Ah, everything was overheated by then!
― Mark G, Friday, 6 July 2007 09:02 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/exbnp-activist-recruiting-prisoners-to-join-alqaida-851592.html
― The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Saturday, 21 June 2008 09:02 (seventeen years ago)
"If you can get someone that's so right-wing to be converted, then a normal prisoner is going to have absolutely no chance."
lololololololololololololol
― DG, Saturday, 21 June 2008 09:13 (seventeen years ago)
Nice to see some sympathy for the BNP upthread.
― Noodle Vague, Saturday, 21 June 2008 09:14 (seventeen years ago)
-- Mark C, Friday, July 6, 2007 9:57 AM (11 months ago) Bookmark Link
lawl
― banriquit, Saturday, 21 June 2008 10:15 (seventeen years ago)
my local asshole threatens national asshole with death
― Ned Trifle (Notinmyname), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 08:49 (fifteen years ago)
How are these clowns doing in Barking btw? Anyone seen any polls on that constituency?
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 09:08 (fifteen years ago)
According to...ahem...a Daily Mail article by Peter Oborne - "Local opinion polls show that BNP leader Nick Griffin stands an excellent chance of unseating veteran Labour MP Margaret Hodge". Don't know where he's getting his info from though.
― Ned Trifle (Notinmyname), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 09:44 (fifteen years ago)
... inside his head
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 09:47 (fifteen years ago)