does your girlfriend/boyfriend/wife/husband have to have the same interests as you?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
do you have much to talk about if you dont?
what if your partner doesnt really have any interests and you do?

splooge (thesplooge), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 11:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Food, sex, lazing around. Everything else is just detail.

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 11:24 (twenty-one years ago)

"doesn't really have any interests?"
what could be talked about with an 'interest-free' person anyway?

donna (donna), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 11:35 (twenty-one years ago)

i am very interested in trash culture, he hates it.
he loves playing videogames, it doesn't interest me at all.
i love music, he loves music. in this we have similar taste but it only overlaps.
we both love food.
we both love film. (although i watch way more movies than thom does.)
we both love literature. (i seem to read more than thom.)
we both love eachother.

jesus nathalie (nathalie), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 11:38 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah.
silly question really, because anyone who mirrors all the same interests as you can be downright spooky. How long can you sustain a relationship when the conversation is going to be so circular and agreeable?
Complementing each others' lives is preferrable - varying interests that overlap here and there but give space for each person to do their own thing.
Dunno why I'm here sounding so pompous, must need sleep again.

donna (donna), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 11:45 (twenty-one years ago)

i agree with you donna but what if the person doesnt really have any passions of their own? i mean, then its like its just you with all the interests, and the other person isnt really interested in anything of their own.

splooge (thesplooge), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 12:17 (twenty-one years ago)

do they 'feed' off your interests?
I mean, do they just hang around you and listen / look etc without interacting?
or do they just sit like a blob and do nothing that resembles living?
sorry but I'm struggling with the concept that anyone with no interests can be partner to someone. How do you get to be someone's partner when you do nothing or are so seemingly bland? What was it that drew your attention to this person in the first place? Has that all gone down the tubes or was it a facade or did you just feel attracted and then hope they might be hiding some passions or something? Not everyone has to be oh-so-exciting but let's face it, most people would be able to lay claim to Some interests, even if they only include tv and food.
IMO someone who has 'no interests' is pretty scarey. Esp if they are latching onto yours.
not healthy.

donna (donna), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 13:00 (twenty-one years ago)

are you certain that it isn't that they Do have interests, but you don't notice them, being busy with the pursuit of your own?

donna (donna), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 13:02 (twenty-one years ago)

good question, well im heavily into music, they buy CDs ocasionally, like a few bands enough to go and see them live, but theyre usually not who i would like to go and see (and vice versa for her). but i dont want someone with the same musical interests, that would be dull. but shes not really *into* music or anything, really. she doesnt read much, does like going to see films, but we dont really discuss them at much length like i might like. i think it was just a case of our personalities clicking in the beginning, and maybe thats fizzled out a little bit, which is making me notice the other things more. maybe youre right, i might have just overlooked the interests as they dont overlap with mine. i dont much care for long walks and things like that. (i must sound like a real fuckwad here).

splooge (thesplooge), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 13:22 (twenty-one years ago)

my answer is no. my girlfriend dosnt really any of my music, i dont really like any of hers. she doesnt like watching the fils i like etc etc etc. we have been together 3 yrs and i think it is becasue of this.

ambrose (ambrose), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 13:34 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe if you still both have the same level of attraction for each other, you can relax into an ok and comfortable scene where you don't 'need' to talk or share those things. other friends can fill the gaps made by lack of interest in discussing movies etc, no one person can be expected to be void filler in every aspect.
If you retain that initial level of intimacy, trust and friendship with one another, it doesn't have to seem so um........mismatched.
It would be a bigger problem if you were both starting to head off in totally different directions, with no inbetween stuff, and no interest in one anothers 'things'. The cliche about needing space to grow as individuals is true, but hooning off in opposite ways is not space to grow.
Or are you just bored n lonely cause you have a need to share music and talk about movies and she doesn't?
Are you looking for reasons for it to be wrong?
Is there anything that you do share a love of? Do you still have that 'connection' thing happening? Did you used to do more as a couple and that has just fizzled out because she now feels ok about sying she doesn't really like that stuff? Or have you both just sort of wandered off? When you give up doing things together, socially with your crowd or just hanging around as a couple, it can be the road to the end.

donna (donna), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 13:48 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah my ex and I shared some interests, well most actually, but had other stuff separate from those things and enjoyed hearing about the other's latest 'whatever'.
Not the reason we split, btw.

donna (donna), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 13:51 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe im looking for reasons for it to be wrong. the connection thing is sort of there, i dont know. not as much as it was, but i think its just different now. not as 'sparkly', thats all. i think we just need to do more together, that could be it. cos we havent had that much time lately.

splooge (thesplooge), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)

how long have you been a couple?

donna (donna), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 15:28 (twenty-one years ago)

We don't share any of the same tastes or interests, but she does find pirate radio sessions entertaining and fascinating.

AdamL :') (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)

My husband shares none of my passion for football, music or books (or interweb mentalism, come to think of it), and our taste in films is wildly different. I don't share his passion for computer games and, er, not going to the pub. But we have common goals and a shared outlook on life, a similar sense of humour and a desire to make the other happy.

Like Mark said way up there, the rest is just detail.

ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 15:49 (twenty-one years ago)

It'd be nice if there was some sort of overlap - you know in music, films, outlook what have ya, but then it's good to have some points of difference too. As long as the p.o.d isn't hating Poison or Avril or somthing like that. Oh, what a mundane answer, sorry.

jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 15:55 (twenty-one years ago)

she doesn't like porn nearly as much as I do

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)

This is a toughy and I don't think there's a magical answer.

I've been married twice, totaling 25 years. One husband and I had nothing in common, whatsoever, but, we were both ambitious and that energy fed off of each other. We were together 13 years, took seperate vacations, had seperate friends...marriage died because we just developed into different areas.

Second marriage, which was 12 years old, we had everything in common, so it was like being with a best friend. Problems developed, however, because of our competative natures, which meant we were fighting for the same job, recognition, etc. Marriage ended badly, too much tension.

Now, I'm with a same sex partner,and I have the best of all worlds. We have a deeply shared interest in films, music and festivals, but, she has her things that she does without me and I have mine. We've struck a nice balance of shared time, solo time, shared friends, private friends.

It's the best relationship that I've had in my life. I don't know if it's because I'm wiser, have made better partner choices, or just luck.

I figure that if you're already asking these questions, the blow flies aren't far behind, laying eggs in the dead relationship.

PsychoKitty (PsychoKitty), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 16:29 (twenty-one years ago)

blow flies? eggs in dead relationship? noooooooooooo!

splooge (thesplooge), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 16:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry, just got done watching a CSI episode. :)

PsychoKitty (PsychoKitty), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)

weve been together 10 months, donna....

splooge (thesplooge), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 17:13 (twenty-one years ago)

does your girlfriend/boyfriend/wife/husband have to have the same interests as you?

No, but it helps.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 22:20 (twenty-one years ago)

especially if one of your interests is yourself

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 22:22 (twenty-one years ago)

doesn't have to have the same interests, but absolutely cannot think mine are stupid.

Maria (Maria), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 22:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I think that's true, in a way I guess thinking someone elses interests (or mine anyway) are stupid is very narrow minded. I'd feel the same about friends.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 22:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I and mine do, yeah - though our areas where we obsess veer off a bit. We both love british comedy and absurd humour (we met having a spastic giggle over Rinkworks, when out drinking once). We're both into the same kind of movies and things like Futurama and the Simpsons. Similar music tastes, though hes not as much into music as me I dont think. Main big diff is though we're both geeks, he's a hardcore gamer and coder, while I'm more a web/design/writerly type.

But we're both nerds, and so it works mighty fine. People would seriously think we were retarded if they overheard some of our conversations.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 23:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Paula Abdul to thread.

Which Describes How You're Feeling All the Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 23:31 (twenty-one years ago)

You're dating Paula Abdul!? ;P

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 23:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Bahahaha.

My wife and I [missus] have loads not in common, but there's some common ground.

Which Describes How You're Feeling All the Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 23:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I dunno I never understood the total opposites thing. But I think its because the shared interests/best mates thing really appeals to me a lot. Having said that I'd never want to be with a partner 24/7.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 23:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah. We do loads of stuff separately.

Which Describes How You're Feeling All the Almanac (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 23:43 (twenty-one years ago)

for me it's not the number of interests my guy and i have in common but the curiosity and openness with which we both approach things. no sense in having a limited set of interests when there's a whole world out there, right? the bigger your conversational arsenal is, the better chance there is that you and your mate will have something in common.

Maneating Leopards of India (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 3 August 2004 23:55 (twenty-one years ago)

My wife and best friend, Martha, has the same outlook on life as I do. We share occasional togetherness on the entertainment front, but that is truly secondary to us.

What has mattered most in our 18 years together is the trust we have in each other and the enjoyment of being in each other's company.

jim wentworth (wench), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 02:21 (twenty-one years ago)

It helps if they can understand my interests and connect with my understanding in some way.

The last relationship failed because we had parallel sets of interests which looked compatible at a distance but close up were irreconcilable.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 4 August 2004 07:16 (twenty-one years ago)

We don't have much music in common, to be honest. It's what I focus on, so I'm always putting things on around the house, and checking that she's not bothered by it. I'm a bit neurotic about my record collection. In contrast, she hasn't unpacked her CDs yet from the recent move, and they've never been organized. She likes a lot of my stuff(Cowboy Junkies, B&S, Mountain Goats, Lilac Time, etc.), but isn't passionate about it, expect for stuff she does NOT like (Morrissey, Kate Bush, Nico, 'loud' stuff). She tolerates my tastes quite well, and will always let me know what she likes and dislikes. I always get really excited when she asks me what something is, and asks to take it to work, recently Randy Newman's 'Sail Away' and the new Saint Etienne Cafe compilation. Radio stations we listen to are oldies or classic rock, just to name the songs. We do share a love for 70's-80's pop as well.

We have fairly equal taste in movies. She once worked at *the* specialty video shop in town, and so is quite knowledgeable of film lore and equally dismissive of those who take it too seriously. We're both way into big hollywood stuff at the moment, and have similar paths of analysis around movies. We both read, with equal amounts of trash, classics, scifi, politics, etc.

Most importantly, as it's where our academic/social efforts are, our politics are the same. We met in a Labour Studies class, and hooked up while running for election in our student society. We've got comparable analyses of society, and equally comparative takes on solutions. We're also equally anti-social, and have almost identical character judgement. Also, she's 6 years older than me, though that hasn't been a problem at all.

I met my previous girlfriend through similar music tastes, and we were quite horribly mismatched, in every other way. I thought music was so important to me that it would naturally inform my relationships. It seems that it isn't that important after all, and, despite my fears, I can keep up my interests without a partner equally engaged.

derrick (derrick), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 08:11 (twenty-one years ago)

that might be my longest ILX post yet. hm. I'm thinking about our relationship a bit today; I've been talking to a friend who I haven't spent much time with for about 1 1/2 years, and we revealed an idle, but very mutual crush that we held back then. It's really 'c'est la vie' at this point for me, and we'll likely be better friends than we've been, but it got me thinking nonetheless.

I'm really happy, and quite lucky.

derrick (derrick), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 08:16 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm easy... potential partners have to be obsessed with me, and i'm obsessed with... me. perfect match!

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 08:34 (twenty-one years ago)

In our house, Bloke likes to go to gigs more than I do, and go to the pub more than I do, which is fine because I don't mind staying home or even zipping up in the car to collect him when he's done. And he likes to play computer games, which is handy because he doesn't like any of the telly I like, so he just hides in the back room while I watch Big Brother. The only problem we ever have is that he really loves scuba diving and I don't want to know, so if he had his way all of his spare cash would go into taking expensive holidays to faraway dive sites, while I am not so keen on that idea. But the idea of taking separate holidays is just not at all appealing to either of us. So I suppose that it's fine if you have separate interests, as long as they aren't conflicting interests.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 08:46 (twenty-one years ago)

My wife and I have some things in common, but mostly not much in common at all. It hasn't hindered our relationship at all in 8 years.

Velveteen Bingo (Chris V), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 11:24 (twenty-one years ago)

My fianceé is a Tennessee Titans fan. I mean, sheesh.

Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 12:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Mine has just started playing the recorder. And I think it's charming. That, my friends, is love.

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 13:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Has he started saying things like "What ho, milady, let me serenade thee with tunes of merriment"?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 13:57 (twenty-one years ago)

No, he's still at the 'fuck, how do I get C# on this thing again?' stage...

Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 14:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh good.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 14:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Top two fingers over their holes, but no thumb, Archel.

(can he play "The Boy with the Arab Strap" yet?)

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 4 August 2004 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)

i think one of the best things about a relationship is the rad things you learn through each others interests. doesn't mean you need to obbsess about the same things, but preferably that when they go on about them it is usually semi-interesting. or their enthusiasm when relating something that is exciting to them is adorable.... *sigh* *love*

scout, Thursday, 5 August 2004 04:54 (twenty-one years ago)

what i mean is: you care because they care. it's endearing to be with someone who gets excited about stuff.

scout, Thursday, 5 August 2004 04:55 (twenty-one years ago)

We were both interested in the same things but of course there were some things we always disagreed on:

- We both adore Yoko Ono, Pet Shop Boys, and Bjork
- We both love experimental art and especially experimental electronic music
- She hates Beck and Tom Waits with a passion, while i luv em
- I love kitsch, she thought it was pointless

When i found out she was a die-hard Sifl & Olly fan i was convinced i had met the one. Someone who loves the cute absurdity of Sifl & Olly is a rare find!!

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 5 August 2004 05:31 (twenty-one years ago)

does your girlfriend/boyfriend/wife/husband have to have the same interests as you?

i never go for relationships where we have too much in common in terms of interests, theres always some overlap but it makes it more interesting to be with someone different and if they are too similar to you isnt it kind of narcissistic (sp?)

sex is probably the only shared interest i look for, but its not like you can tell that until you get involved anyway.

whos_step, Thursday, 5 August 2004 07:01 (twenty-one years ago)

it is endearing when someone has interests, but verging off the relationship thing a bit, i have a friend whose interest/obsession with comics/blockbusters and the like is so witless and maniacal, its anything but endearing. its more punchable.

splooge (thesplooge), Thursday, 5 August 2004 11:27 (twenty-one years ago)

four years pass...

Every time he comes to my house, he throws a truffle wrapper on the floor. I am not interested in that.

(b)admin (roxymuzak), Sunday, 10 May 2009 09:38 (sixteen years ago)

You should be, throwing truffle wrappers on the floor is the best!

Tuomas, Sunday, 10 May 2009 09:42 (sixteen years ago)

My gf is 8,000 miles away. I am not interested in that.

SQUIRREL WITH A PEOPLE FACE (╓abies), Sunday, 10 May 2009 09:45 (sixteen years ago)

whos_step otm

Tracer Hand, Sunday, 10 May 2009 10:26 (sixteen years ago)

there's a Chris Rock line that goes something like "you're never going to find someone who likes Seinfeld and the Wu-Tang Clan", which is pretty otm. There does need to be some amount of shared interest tho, can't spend your entire life tolerating shit you're not interested in.

languid samuel l. jackson (jim), Sunday, 10 May 2009 16:49 (sixteen years ago)

Sure you can.

M.V., Sunday, 10 May 2009 17:37 (sixteen years ago)

yeah, but what a waste of time.

languid samuel l. jackson (jim), Sunday, 10 May 2009 17:38 (sixteen years ago)

whos_step otm

― Tracer Hand, Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:26 AM (7 hours ago)

dulce est desipere in loco (Euler), Sunday, 10 May 2009 17:41 (sixteen years ago)

plus you can develop shared interests together that you didn't have before, thus ensuring your relationship is more than the sum of its parts

dulce est desipere in loco (Euler), Sunday, 10 May 2009 17:42 (sixteen years ago)

I'm pretty much Captain Fail when it comes to romance, but this seems OTM^^^

SQUIRREL WITH A PEOPLE FACE (╓abies), Sunday, 10 May 2009 17:43 (sixteen years ago)

The interests of my long time gf barely overlap with mine. We get along marvelously, because I still respect the stuff she's into even if it's not really my thing, and vice versa.

^ Z S on the internet here (Z S), Sunday, 10 May 2009 17:50 (sixteen years ago)

You have to have some basis for enjoying time together other than snogging or rolling in the hay. Otherwise all the time you spend not snogging or rolling in the hay will seem tedious, irritating or empty. That might work for a very short time, but it's bound to wear thin before too long.

Aimless, Sunday, 10 May 2009 17:56 (sixteen years ago)

i like Seinfeld and the Wu-Tang Clan

Vaclav Havel mostly. (Matt P), Sunday, 10 May 2009 18:05 (sixteen years ago)

jim

Vaclav Havel mostly. (Matt P), Sunday, 10 May 2009 18:06 (sixteen years ago)

well theyre interested in me so

Lamp, Sunday, 10 May 2009 18:06 (sixteen years ago)

z_s otm - it's totally not about sharing the same interests, but having respect for and an interest IN your partner's interests. and sometimes your partner will help you find interests you never had before.

i didn't get into serious book-collecting till my husband introduced me to it; i didn't know anything about small press stuff till we both began exploring it and discovered we were both really into it; we both got into a particular genre of art around the same time. our tastes do tend to overlap in a lot of areas, but are def not the same.

where we turn sweet dreams into remarkable realities (just1n3), Sunday, 10 May 2009 18:07 (sixteen years ago)

worst mistake you can make going into a relationship with someone whose interests you don't like or respect: having the expectation that you will be able to 'convert' them into loving everything you love.

where we turn sweet dreams into remarkable realities (just1n3), Sunday, 10 May 2009 18:08 (sixteen years ago)

zs and justine otm. i have found myself incredibly attracted to people whose interests i have never thought about before, but when you have the right connection, those interests become your interests. or, even if you find yourself not into whatever they're into, you can still respect and appreciate that they're into whatever they're into, and that goes a long way.

tehresa, Sunday, 10 May 2009 18:17 (sixteen years ago)

this should not be confused with liking something as a means to get someone to like you - which people also do.

tehresa, Sunday, 10 May 2009 18:18 (sixteen years ago)

and which rarely works for longer than 5 min

tehresa, Sunday, 10 May 2009 18:18 (sixteen years ago)

sometimes thats all it takes tho

Lamp, Sunday, 10 May 2009 18:20 (sixteen years ago)

'must like seinfeld and wu-tang'.

i think thats a fair enough request.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Sunday, 10 May 2009 18:29 (sixteen years ago)

We seem to be talking about the difference between affinity for, similarity between, and identity of interests. If you at least have a certain affinity for the interests of your bf/gf, then you should be ok.

Aimless, Sunday, 10 May 2009 18:33 (sixteen years ago)

We share a great enthusiasm for alcohol.

Beth Parker, Sunday, 10 May 2009 18:56 (sixteen years ago)

My fianceé is a Tennessee Titans fan. I mean, sheesh.

― Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, August 4, 2004 7:55 AM (4 years ago) Bookmark

how times change

I wish I was the royal trux (sunny successor), Sunday, 10 May 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)

lol

(b)admin (roxymuzak), Sunday, 10 May 2009 20:27 (sixteen years ago)

my bf hates seinfeld and considers wu-tang old school rap

(b)admin (roxymuzak), Sunday, 10 May 2009 20:27 (sixteen years ago)

dumpable offenses imo

I'm not some HOOS for someone's lust to snack on! (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Sunday, 10 May 2009 20:44 (sixteen years ago)

i hate seinfeld but i don't know how you can like both, they seem like two things that you have to like one or the other
or is that the point of the joke

fantazy land (harbl), Sunday, 10 May 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)

i like both

xpost HOOS!

(b)admin (roxymuzak), Sunday, 10 May 2009 20:47 (sixteen years ago)

Yea I like both as well.

I was hoping "I am not interested in that" was gonna take off as a meme (within this thread only)

SQUIRREL WITH A PEOPLE FACE (╓abies), Sunday, 10 May 2009 20:52 (sixteen years ago)

i am not interested in seinfeld is all
i am interested in wu-tang

fantazy land (harbl), Sunday, 10 May 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)

u should date my bf

(b)admin (roxymuzak), Sunday, 10 May 2009 21:01 (sixteen years ago)

i mean i basically had stars in my eyes the day i was at Spider House cafe and saw a pink haired chick in a Devin the Dude tour shirt with some philosophy book on her table while she blogged

I'm not some HOOS for someone's lust to snack on! (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Sunday, 10 May 2009 21:06 (sixteen years ago)

but i did not approach her because i just assumed it never would have worked etc

also i had a gf iirc

I'm not some HOOS for someone's lust to snack on! (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Sunday, 10 May 2009 21:09 (sixteen years ago)

girl sounds like a nightmare

(b)admin (roxymuzak), Sunday, 10 May 2009 21:11 (sixteen years ago)

internet dating has refined this whole thing into a system of checkboxes and i think loads of people actually imagine that if their list lines up with someone else's then BAM it ought to work. but people like things in reaction to or in sympathy with some person or scene in their lives rather than the thing qua thing, and it's the motion of those reactions or sympathies that matter more, imo, though how you'd work that into a list of checkboxes is beyond me

Tracer Hand, Sunday, 10 May 2009 21:16 (sixteen years ago)

I would never be able to stomach a republican. Or someone who didn't approach life with a general lustiness.
My husband and I have been together 20 yrs, and our tastes/interests are very different, with a few intersections. But we're both rabid lefties and gluttons.

Beth Parker, Sunday, 10 May 2009 21:58 (sixteen years ago)

and both psychotically devoted to our dog.

Beth Parker, Sunday, 10 May 2009 23:14 (sixteen years ago)

every time my friend matt, who is from philly, quotes seinfeld (which i have never seen before) he says to me: "sorry, east coast humor."

homosexual II, Monday, 11 May 2009 13:47 (sixteen years ago)

hahaha

languid samuel l. jackson (jim), Monday, 11 May 2009 14:05 (sixteen years ago)

Em and I have loads of shared interests, some that date from before we were together, and that helped establish us together, I guess, and some that have grown over the time we've been together. If anything we probably don't have enough separate interests at the moment.

Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 11 May 2009 15:57 (sixteen years ago)

anything we probably don't have enough separate interests at the moment.

can relate to this.

Old Big 'OOS (AKA the Cupwinner) (darraghmac), Tuesday, 12 May 2009 09:28 (sixteen years ago)

one month passes...

i mean i basically had stars in my eyes the day i was at Spider House cafe and saw a pink haired chick in a Devin the Dude tour shirt with some philosophy book on her table while she blogged

― I'm not some HOOS for someone's lust to snack on! (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:06 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
but i did not approach her because i just assumed it never would have worked etc

also i had a gf iirc

― I'm not some HOOS for someone's lust to snack on! (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:09 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
girl sounds like a nightmare

― (b)admin (roxymuzak), Sunday, May 10, 2009 5:11 PM (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

hahaha i was so rude

stop having a boring luna, stop having a boring trife (roxymuzak), Saturday, 13 June 2009 20:35 (sixteen years ago)

a month ago

stop having a boring luna, stop having a boring trife (roxymuzak), Saturday, 13 June 2009 20:36 (sixteen years ago)

think you were pretty otm imo, sorry hoos.

sirk awl (circa1916), Saturday, 13 June 2009 22:06 (sixteen years ago)

true i run screaming from anyone who blogs

harbl, Saturday, 13 June 2009 22:25 (sixteen years ago)

hi harbl

stop having a boring luna, stop having a boring trife (roxymuzak), Saturday, 13 June 2009 22:27 (sixteen years ago)

;)

stop having a boring luna, stop having a boring trife (roxymuzak), Saturday, 13 June 2009 22:27 (sixteen years ago)

; )

harbl, Saturday, 13 June 2009 22:31 (sixteen years ago)

y the long face

stop having a boring luna, stop having a boring trife (roxymuzak), Saturday, 13 June 2009 22:33 (sixteen years ago)

lol

casual racism fridays (bug), Saturday, 13 June 2009 22:37 (sixteen years ago)

more realistic

harbl, Saturday, 13 June 2009 22:37 (sixteen years ago)

fwiw my new gf does not blog

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 13 June 2009 22:56 (sixteen years ago)

what a disaster for blogdom

velko, Saturday, 13 June 2009 23:01 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.zgeek.com/forum/gallery/files/3/4/9/6/kane_clap.gif

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 13 June 2009 23:17 (sixteen years ago)

I enjoy both Seinfeld and the wu-tang clan, two things that share the accents of my hometown. Trying to get my head around how these things could be mutually exclusive I think requires me to mentally transport myself somewhere far far away.

Endless Bourgie (gabbneb), Saturday, 13 June 2009 23:50 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.