This is the thread where we appreciate '24' (now with season four SPOILERS!)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I missed this show when it was on despite ringing endorsements from pals (who, it should be noted, mentioned a serious decline / dumbing down in the second season - true?) but The Woman and I just rented the series on DVD and we stayed up watching the first four hours last night. Totally hooked! Can it possibly get better? Does / did anyone love this show? No spoilers please!

A perfect time to not have cable.

roger adultery (roger adultery), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:13 (twenty-one years ago)

which series are you watching? it's going to be difficuly appreciating the programme without spoilers. there are other threads however.

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I absolutely love this show. We've just finished watching series 2 on dvd. I much prefer to watch it this way as I can never wait a whole week for the next episode. You have to do robotic dancing to the beeps though, i think it's the law!! All I can say is, 'Kim, why the f@#k are you so dumb, oh & you have terrible luck girl!'

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:18 (twenty-one years ago)

24 is amazing. I personally like the second season best, but that might be because it was the first one I saw. The third takes a while to warm up, but there are a couple of scenes in the second half which just knocked the wind out of me. People who accuse it of dumbing down are ignoring the fact it was pretty silly to begin with.

By the way, the mole is...

Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:19 (twenty-one years ago)

I have seen about the first 3 episodes of the 3rd one & i quite liked it actually. Just gotta wait for a friend to buy the 3rd series so that we can borrow it!!

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:23 (twenty-one years ago)

i think each series has it's equal share of OMGWTF moments both serious and silly. Season 2 has the best ending imo. I bought the first series on DVD as soon as it came out but have barely watched it again so might flog it.

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:32 (twenty-one years ago)

dumbest character on the show not Kim but Sherry: FFS's woman, you know this man since childhood, surely a master manipulator such as yourself could eventually pick up on the fact that Palmer is a lot easier to convince using ideological arguments than by doing the same "but think about your career!" dance over and over again?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)

By the way, does anyone know if there's any truth in the rumour that season four's going to be set in London?

VERY MINOR SPOILERS - SPOILERETTES, REALLY
If it is we might have a British character who isn't a) evil or b) dead within half an hour.

Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:39 (twenty-one years ago)

24 is awesome. I had my doubts, I even watched the first episode of the first series and dismissed it as rubbish. Until, that is, I borrowed the whole first series and watched it in about a week. the second and third series are both good, though Kim's character is entirely unnecessary for the show. I don't know which series I liked the best though, as the 3rd series IS good, but takes about 12 episodes to really get going.

Craig Gilchrist, Friday, 10 September 2004 12:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Kim's entire purpose in season three was basically to have an annoying fringe.

Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:42 (twenty-one years ago)

stevem otm tho - this show relies so much on the "WHOA DIDN'T SEE THAT COMING!!" factor that a spoilerless discussion won't go anywhere, and a spoiler-heavy one will piss ppl off that haven't seen all of it yet (they're showing 2nd season ovah heah); only way I could see to get around this would be to have one thread for every season...

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 10 September 2004 12:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Where is 'ovah heah' that you're only on the 2nd series?

Craig Gilchrist, Friday, 10 September 2004 12:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I love that little twist that you have at the end of each episode so that it can keep going.

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Arrgggh!! So hard to resist spoilers.

Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:15 (twenty-one years ago)

My hope for series 4: Jack turns out to have been working for the baddies all along.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I hope that the Couger comes back and eats Kim.

Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Emilio Estevez finally makes his long-awaited (by me) cameo, along with Alex Winter (bodalicious assassin) and the girl who played Katie Landers in Neighbours who could well be totally hot these days.

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Kim should become a White House intern.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Hm, you'd think she could be useful somehow as CTU spend most of their time chasing after her, hm, i wonder!!!

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Kim should just take Jacks job.

Craig Gilchrist, Friday, 10 September 2004 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Jack should be given a choice of cutting Kim's head off and feeding it to cougars or blowing up the universe.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 10 September 2004 13:32 (twenty-one years ago)

But Jack would just find a way around blowing up the universe. He's awesome like that.

Craig Gilchrist, Friday, 10 September 2004 13:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Where is 'ovah heah' that you're only on the 2nd series?

Portugal. We've gone through four seasons of "Buffy" by now you know.

I love that little twist that you have at the end of each episode so that it can keep going.

I've noticed that this has broken down pretty badly in the 2nd season; Jack going "this is far from over!" and someone shooting someone that it was very clear they were going to off ain't exactly in the same league as the final plot twists in the first season (including its last episode!)

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 10 September 2004 14:04 (twenty-one years ago)

But can you really watch these series more than once?

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Friday, 10 September 2004 14:05 (twenty-one years ago)

My mum gave me season one on DVD for my birthday, which I missed when it was on the BBC. I've only watched it once, and have no particular desire to again. Good for introducing the programe to friends, though.

Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 10 September 2004 14:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Very handy! I'm sure you could hire it out. I'd be loathed to buy it as it's quite expensive, then I doubt i'd watch it again.

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Friday, 10 September 2004 14:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think you'd be loathed.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 10 September 2004 14:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Thank you for your contribution.

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Friday, 10 September 2004 14:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I have all 3 series, and I started to watch series 1 for the first time since buying it a couple of months ago and I really got back into it. But the WAS about 2 years after watching it the first time. Mostly a waste of money. But maybe I'll watch it again when i'm senile.

Craig Gilchrist, Friday, 10 September 2004 14:39 (twenty-one years ago)

the first half of season 1- very, very good. the second half of season 1 spiralled downwards in quality alarmingly quickly until i was praying that the end would come, but unwilling to stop watching after having invested 20 hours or more on it.

season 2- watched the first 5 or 6 hours before realising that the only character i enjoyed was jack. the others were just plain annoying. even kim's beauty couldn't make me watch the rest.

Officer Pupp, Sunday, 12 September 2004 12:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I've got Season 1 on DVD, and I keep thinking I will watch it again now that I know how it ends to see if I can spot the point where the writers decided who the mole was going to be, because I'm sure there are actions taken earlier on which don't make sense when you view the bigger picture (I watched it when it was on BBC2 at the time, and haven't seen it since).

But I haven't.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 12 September 2004 12:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I love that little twist that you have at the end of each episode so that it can keep going.

TV show in tune-in-next-week shockah!

It's just like the EastEnders drum roll, but with bullets and bombs and cougars and stuff instead of Dirty Den's grumpy face.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 12 September 2004 12:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Season 3 was dire in the middle but it's still an excellent show just off the first two seasons. I think it's kind of funny how they use a silent clock for poignant moments.

Vinnie (vprabhu), Sunday, 12 September 2004 14:18 (twenty-one years ago)

season 1 is totally tv crack, actually they all are really. but i think the show is really a case of diminishing returns (the b plot in s2 is so weak)

s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 12 September 2004 15:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I really like how palmer's storyline in season two tied in to the main plot in the second half.

Wooden (Wooden), Sunday, 12 September 2004 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)

TV show in tune-in-next-week shockah!
What I meant was that it always seems that the prog could end right then & there & always introduce something (usually ridiculous twist) like Kim getting kidnapped AGAIN!

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Monday, 13 September 2004 08:32 (twenty-one years ago)

For you fans of both 24 and the Go-Betweens .. From the Go-Betweens mailing list:

"If there are any fans of the show "24" out there, I'm
honoring Robert and Grant with a little namecheck on
what will be episode six of season 4, which should air
in February of 2005. Little tribute, 'nuff said." [E.K.]

dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 13 September 2004 10:32 (twenty-one years ago)

wtf?

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Monday, 13 September 2004 10:33 (twenty-one years ago)

My guess - celebrity terrorist says "Don't you know Jack, I'm a star!". Jack then gets hit by twin layers of lightning.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 13 September 2004 11:22 (twenty-one years ago)

"Agents McClennan and Forster will be the go-betweens on this mission"

dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 13 September 2004 11:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Ooh - I like it.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 13 September 2004 11:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Season one was by far the best season. Bauer explained and used neat tricks to get information out of people which you felt could be straight out of the CIA playbook. The Season two really let itself down with lame dialogue and Star Trek-ish 'use-whatever-technology-to-get-the-characters-out-of-sticky-situations'.

Season three was better than two because it has some of the best twists the series has ever done. The whole thing from the very first episode just documents Jack Bauer's descent from a happy, successful family man into a bumbling, clueless idiot who's been let down by his colleagues and daughter. I like it for that.

I have great hopes for season four, even if they're bringing back some of the lamest characters and still setting the show in LA, even though they'd promised not to. Also, rumours are that this'll be the last season. Which is probably a good thing.

http://img37.exs.cx/img37/3491/Season4.jpg

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Monday, 13 September 2004 11:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Skidmore's in it!

Alba (Alba), Monday, 13 September 2004 11:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Season three was better than two because it has some of the best twists the series has ever done.

Whatever.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Tuesday, 14 September 2004 22:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I just saw the first DVD last night. I avoided the show initially on principle because I kind of loathe Kiefer Sutherland, but the delicious gimmickyness and momentum totally distracted me from my dislike.

I think I'll go rent the next five DVDs or so tonight.

I love it, in the way I love hyperkinetic anime or dating people I know are bad for me. Delicious!

Laura E (laurae55), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 01:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I agree about the Kiefer thing. I don't like him either but he's pretty perfect for the role. Do you think he was responsible for getting Lou Diamond the role of DeSalvo becuz of the Young Guns connection?

The only one who was miscast was that dumbass daughter. She sucks

roger adultery (roger adultery), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 01:52 (twenty-one years ago)

the second half of the third season beats season two for me, but the first half of the third season blew. I have high hopes for four.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 03:48 (twenty-one years ago)

How can you not like Kiefer?

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 13:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, he's so sensative. He shoots like a hundred people then goes and has a bit of a cry about it.

Wooden (Wooden), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 14:03 (twenty-one years ago)

It's not real life you know?!!

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 14:05 (twenty-one years ago)

What? CTU isn't really protecting us from terrorism day and night? Now I'm scared.

Wooden (Wooden), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 14:06 (twenty-one years ago)

he only shoots bad people who endanger his life and/or those of the people he cares about. its's a dirty job but someone has to do it.

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 14:07 (twenty-one years ago)

What? CTU isn't really protecting us from terrorism day and night?
Now I'm scared.

Well of course it doesn't exist in the UK!! jeez!

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 14:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Now I'm even more scared. Stop telling me these things.

Wooden (Wooden), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

we've got Spooks instead

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

And James Bond.

Wooden (Wooden), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 14:17 (twenty-one years ago)

We used to have Bugs, but I'm not sure they ever really helped.

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I really like all three seasons for different reasons, but season three for me has the most "holy SHIT!" moments. I liked Phil Hartman as the drug lord, too.

Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)

? phil hartman is dead!

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.tomtodoroff.com/quotes_files/joaquin.gif

http://troymcclurepage.tripod.com/big-phil.jpg

Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 17:18 (twenty-one years ago)

You mean Gabriel Byrne.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

shit

Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

When Season 3 first started Charlie Brooker pointed out that the drug lord looked like Roland Rivron. And he was right.

(Sorry Americans and sudry foriegners, I can't find a decent picture of Roland Rivron to post.)

Wooden (Wooden), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 17:30 (twenty-one years ago)

i saw Roland Rivron as a talking head on Five's terrible Greatest Chat Show Moments the other week and the guy never looked so sober, sincere and informed. it was startling.

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Whenever he's on a holiday programme he always gets the really shit holiday, like the Norfolk broads or something, while the other presenters swan about in the Seychelles. Poor guy.

Wooden (Wooden), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)

(Sorry Americans and sudry foriegners, I can't find a decent picture of Roland Rivron to post.)

-- Wooden (josephgoode...), September 15th, 2004 6:30 PM.


SUNDRY foriegners. 'Sudry' is not an obscure British insult, I promise.

Wooden (Wooden), Wednesday, 15 September 2004 17:56 (twenty-one years ago)

two weeks pass...
I just watched the 1st three DVDs of Season 2 and I'm up to 1 PM... am I alone in wanting very badly for the little blonde girl to get caught in the nuclear blast?

Honestly. It makes me so glad I'm watching it on DVD so I can fast forward through all the pointless scenes of the terrible child actress screwing up her face and crying.

Laura E (laurae55), Friday, 1 October 2004 18:38 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
see the trailer for series 4!

http://homepage.mac.com/csdesigns/24/S4trailer.html

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Monday, 29 November 2004 18:15 (twenty-one years ago)

ARGH JANUARY ARGH

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 29 November 2004 18:20 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm glad Chloe's back and not liking your tone

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Monday, 29 November 2004 18:39 (twenty-one years ago)

JANUARY MUST HAPPEN NOW

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 29 November 2004 18:40 (twenty-one years ago)

it doesn't seem as 'unmissable' anymore tho. maybe that's just because of the way it's been sold/treated over here. the third series never even made it to terrestrial TV screens so unless you had Sky or BitTorrent here you couldn't see it. i'll probably check out a few eps via Bt but i doubt i'll be setting up my whole Thursday or Sunday night around it like i once did.

Frankenstein On Ice (blueski), Monday, 29 November 2004 18:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Now there's a trailer that's like the trailer posted above, but with a bonus 30 seconds.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Tuesday, 30 November 2004 02:32 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
"WHAT IS YOUR PRIMARY OBJECTIVE?"

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Sunday, 9 January 2005 20:01 (twenty years ago)

I no longer feel so bad about not watching this season.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Monday, 10 January 2005 03:12 (twenty years ago)

it was pretty good!

teeny (teeny), Monday, 10 January 2005 04:14 (twenty years ago)

yes, it was. i watched it for the first time tonight and was sucked into both episodes that aired. and it is on tommorrow as well!

Emilymv (Emilymv), Monday, 10 January 2005 04:42 (twenty years ago)

Shohreh Aghdashloo looks like Catherine Zeta-Jones at 52 in this show

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 10 January 2005 06:23 (twenty years ago)

it was pretty good although that brunette ctu agent is pretty modelly looking. I'm glad Chloe is still there. I hate william devane, I hope they behead him tomorrow.

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 10 January 2005 07:26 (twenty years ago)

I don't trust that brunette. Or that sweaty fat guy. Alberta Watson, she's pretty damn great. This cast is shaping up to be much better overall than the past ones, acting-chops wise.

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 10 January 2005 07:31 (twenty years ago)

I think the fat guy will be the chloe of this season.

teeny (teeny), Monday, 10 January 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)

I don't trust that brunette.

I think they're trying to make you think she's really a goodie, therefore she must be a baddie, and her husband will be the one who turns out to be a double agent, or cracks and tries to stop their plan, or helps out Jack, or whatever. Despite him being a complete arse to the son.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 05:56 (twenty years ago)

I confused my brunettes, sorry. I meant Shohreh Aghdashloo.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 05:57 (twenty years ago)

It's funny that two years after the Blondes of Indistinction, last night one of my floormates expressed confusion about the characters because they all looked alike.

Were episodes 3 and 4 any cop?

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 06:04 (twenty years ago)

good shite

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 06:12 (twenty years ago)

Does that mean it's bad?

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 06:17 (twenty years ago)

I decided to watch this last night based upon the lame novelty that it was my 24th birthday. I think I am hooked now.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 15:16 (twenty years ago)

I still love it, although once again, all the women are evil or idiotic (possible exception of Jack's girlfriend).

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 17:00 (twenty years ago)

okay that inexplicably porn-y looking brunette still annoys after the four hours. Is the new president the guy who was running against palmer last season? I can't remember what he looked like! I still hate william devane and wish they would get on with the killing.

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 17:06 (twenty years ago)

Teeny, how can you say all the women are evil or idiotic? Chloe is in it. She's great.

Starts 30th January in the UK, folks. Is this thread likely to have spoilers?

ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 18:11 (twenty years ago)

you're right, chloe has redeemed herself, and there aren't a lot of redeemable male characters either.

yes and anyone wanting to discuss plot points should note spoilers, and I'm a mod, so I'll change the title to note that there are season 4 spoilers contained within...UK folks start another thread when that happens, perhaps?

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 18:15 (twenty years ago)

I'd never watched this show, but I watched both new episodes last night and now am pretty much hooked. FUN! I love Chloe because she was on Mr. Show and in Punchdrunk Love and I have minor crush on her though they made her look pretty bad in 24 last night. Is the Turkish terrorist mom the mom from "House of Sand & Fog"?

(SPOILERS)
My whole favorite bit was Jack having to rob the convenience store to keep the hostile in one place, it nicely reversed the good guy-bad guy dynamics, very intriguing!
(END SPOILERS)

n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

Is the Turkish terrorist mom the mom from "House of Sand & Fog"?

Yes. Also, AISHA!!!!!!

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:01 (twenty years ago)

But they're making Aisha Taylor be a baddie, it looks like! She's so hot, why does she have to be evil?

n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)

I like to have died
when I saw that holy name
in the credits! YOW!

Haibun (Begs2Differ), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)

xpost to adam: GET ONE KNOWLEDGE OF THE WORLD

Haibun (Begs2Differ), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 19:08 (twenty years ago)

http://www.npr.org/programs/waitwait/archrndwn/2004/feb/tyler140.jpg

I AM BAD!

Remy IS THE Snush (x Jeremy), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 20:00 (twenty years ago)

she's purty. but they still haven't learned to weave in the character background stories very convincingly. And we've seen "jack goes rogue, gets caught" "jack loyalists at ctu go rogue, get caught" how many times? You could probably make an episode blueprint of 24 plot twists by now.

all that aside, it usually takes until about halfway for things to really pick up, so I will keep watching. (also, no Kim = addition by subtraction, obviously.)

bnw (bnw), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 20:08 (twenty years ago)

warning signs: Jack said Kim now lives in Valencia, Jack pursuing baddie around Valencia

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 20:20 (twenty years ago)

BOO HISSSS

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 11 January 2005 23:02 (twenty years ago)

But Aisha Taylor is blatently going to help out Chloe and Jack by telling Edgar about Driscoll's cancelling the LAPD call-out to her schizophrenic daughter, right? I like her.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 04:25 (twenty years ago)

Aisha's gotta be a red herring. And I think Chloe and Driscoll are neither evil nor idiotic! Driscoll seems a little too by-the-book if anything (haha, watch in episode 5 as Driscoll knifes Sweaty McTub in the supply closet.)

I like how the current season is influenced by both current events overseas (albeit shifted to U.S. soil) and 3 Days of the Condor (with that Andrew subplot).

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 04:31 (twenty years ago)

..and we'd better see no more of that schizophrenic daughter. She looked like a worse character to introduce into the show than season two's Lonnie-the-survivalist-bomb-shelter-gun-nut-Dillon-brother guy.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 12 January 2005 04:49 (twenty years ago)

Pluses:
Chloe being sympathetic and cool -- biggest achievement ever!
This Aisha is outclassing everyone else on the show.
Mrs. Terrorist is ten times the Lady Macbeth that Sherry was.

Minus:
Teh son is teh annoying.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Sunday, 16 January 2005 20:33 (twenty years ago)

the araz son or the defense secretary's son?

teeny (teeny), Sunday, 16 January 2005 20:43 (twenty years ago)

the lesson in the world of "24" is that children are terrible

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Sunday, 16 January 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)

AISHA!!!!! OPPRESS ME WITH BITCHINESS!!!!!!

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 16 January 2005 21:14 (twenty years ago)

Gear otm!

I meant the Araz son -- the actor is VERY stiff. I was hoping Mom would pistol whip him very being such a predictable drip.

Meanwhile, Richard Son of SOD is a horrible depiction of a privileged lefty brat, though probably accurate!

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Sunday, 16 January 2005 21:19 (twenty years ago)

The suspicion and conniving that goes on the CTU office is starting to bug me. How long would you last working in a place like that? No wonder every day is a crisis.

And why doesn't the government just give Jack a "let him do whatever he wants" card? He's already proven himself to be the only guy who knows shit about shit.

dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 17 January 2005 14:12 (twenty years ago)

The Palmer gov't did give Jack a "let him do whatever he wants" card and it ended up with the Prez having to bow out of a re-election bid. President Slimer knows his history too well to make that mistake again.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 17 January 2005 14:49 (twenty years ago)

I thought he bowed out because of the Sherry/murder thing.

Seems like Jack was always getting held up by CTU, even when Palmer was President. First, there was killed-by-nuclear-bomb director, and then shot-in-the-back-of-the-head director. Both had it in for Jack and constantly got in his way. He never pulled out a card and said, fuck off asshole, I AM the government.

dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 17 January 2005 14:58 (twenty years ago)

Episode five was better than I was expecting. And after that cliffhanger, which I thought was so well done, I can't wait for next week's show. Have to try not to think too much about it otherwise it'll never live up to the expectations.

I liked the bit where Chloe called Edgar a geek too...

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 19 January 2005 04:34 (twenty years ago)

The briefcase belonged to defense contractor McClennan Forster .. Nice one Evan Katz!

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 02:32 (twenty years ago)

I can hardy wait to find out how the Heritage Foundation plays into this.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 25 January 2005 03:21 (twenty years ago)

I want to speak to Kiefer.

Seriously, that episode came close to jumping the shark in the first ten minutes, but the last five - minus that annoying Behrooz kid and the Secretary of Defense's retarded son and his shitty dialogue - more than made up for it.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 04:49 (twenty years ago)

i like how they basically wrapped up the whole storyline and started a new one; it's like the first act is over, and it's moving on to something else. they've kind of done this in the past but not so succinctly. they definitely aren't dragging stuff out this time.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 17:14 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, but they did that in the second season and had to drag it out into that awful "trial of David Palmer"/"let's go to war" arc for ten episodes.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 26 January 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)

the chief villain = the mummy?? :s

bass braille (....), Tuesday, 1 February 2005 20:56 (twenty years ago)

Sorry for being dense folx but what won't the secdef's son tell CTU about? The other person who knew where the secdef was that morning was Audrey fucking Raines, how come she doesn't get tortured?? And didn't Jack know too? But I assume it's something else; the son says his "personal business" isn't relevant. Are we supposed to know what he's talking about? Or does he really not know anything?

Does anybody else think it's weird that CTU apprently just tortures people as a matter of course? I mean it's one thing when Jack does it; he's a "rogue." But the director of CTU is just like "hmm she might know something. Taser her neck!" as casually as if she's instructing her husband to rotate the bed. This gets at one of the main thrills of the show, which is that the protagonists - Jack, and everybody else - really does have a "do what you like" card - there are no rules except power. They've even started joking about it. When Audrey calms down Tony Almeida's girlfriend (TONY ALMEIDA!!!!!!!!! Anyone else think this show is precisely as good as however many minutes Carlos Bernard has on screen? When he comes in gunz blazing it's as good as this show's been all year! And then we get to see the inside of his house! I've always wanted to see the inside of Tony Almeida's house! Actually I've always just wanted to BE Tony Almeida.) - anyway when Audrey calms down this (idiotic, possibly evil!) girl, she's like "your boss will understand." "What if he doesn't?" "I can have him killed." And they both chuckle!!? This dynamic is a civil-service twist on classic dramatic dictum that protagonists must be members of the aristocracy for a drama to come alive. If the protags are bound by the laws and etc that bind all of us to our relatively powerless - in the scheme of "things" i.e. the big important national/political/death-dealing things - lives, then they can't carry out dramatic actions that are effective in overcoming the problem. So Shakespeare wrote about nobles without money problems. Scorcese made films about gangsters. NYPD Blue made TV shows about cops who could go to whatever length to solve problems. Oz was about prisoners with nothing else to lose. In all these situations the main characters get to use whatever tools are at their disposal.

TONY ALMEIDA. God he's even sourer than before! His (and George Mason's) clipped all-business low-keyness made the whole show for me in Season 2 (the only other one I've seen). To see him back is just great. Keifer barely has it together. He looks like he's hearing music in his head, or radio interference from a filling.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 13 February 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)

All the men on the show whisper and it annoys the hell out of me.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Sunday, 13 February 2005 21:19 (twenty years ago)

The chixor who played Tony's girlfriend works at some office with a couple of friends of mine, she's a PA, I think!

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Sunday, 13 February 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)

Yeah the whispering thing is dumm but Tony A is just so GOOD at it! He gives this little "god I wish I were anywhere but here" pout after every line, it's great.

Gear, "PA" is kind of what I thought when she started talking.. (unless you're referring to Michelle!! Who was mentioned as working for district now! Given her proximity and the new revelations in her and Tony's backstory it will be a sore disappointment if she doesn't show up soon.)

I still miss George Mason. At least when he got in Jack's way you could kind of go "aw you loveable old coot." This new director is a fucking sadistic psycho.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Sunday, 13 February 2005 21:57 (twenty years ago)

My favorite moment of this season's ludicrously bad first episode was when the graphic design slacker is downloading illegal pirated computer s0phtwareZ, and a window pops up with scrolling gobbledygook. His co-worker says "it looks like somebody is trying to corrupt the internet!"

A lot of the writing that seemed clever in the 2nd season now just sounds like it's there to tie up loose ends or explain previously nonsensical conflicts. i.e. Chloe's big "go rogue for Jack's sake" when Jack wants satellite tracking of his target's car. Chloe says she'll have to do it on the sly, and even then she'll have to wait in a queue for satellite imagery because all of CTU's resources are currently being thrown at... finding Jack and his target!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 14 February 2005 06:35 (twenty years ago)

(In the next episode Aiesha asks Edgar, who's helping Chloe go rogue: "Are you running satellite imagery to find Jack Bauer and the target???" And he's like "uh yeah that's what we're all supposed to be doing!" And then she says something really quickly about how division is supposed to be doing that, to explain to us why Chloe didn't just pull up satellite images 45 minutes ago. But then Jack wouldn't have gotten to rob that convenient store and get all barky again.)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 14 February 2005 06:42 (twenty years ago)

Aisha's in for a world of hurt, I'm guessing.

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 14 February 2005 06:43 (twenty years ago)

Throw her in the Kim Bauer Memorial Cougar Room.

The last episode was the first one where I really was like "whoa" at something - i.e. the Big Kahuna getting offed by a mysterious sniper just as Jack and Tony apprehended him. The second series (the only other ones I've seen) was chock-a-block with moments like that.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 14 February 2005 08:19 (twenty years ago)

the Big Kahuna getting offed by a mysterious sniper just as Jack and Tony apprehended him. The second series (the only other ones I've seen) was chock-a-block with moments like that.

Almost exactly like that, thoguh. Remember how they offed Syed Ali? It was the same, only it was a van instead of a helicopter and it was dark instead of daytime.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Monday, 14 February 2005 13:42 (twenty years ago)

Yes exactly, it was awesome! I fear change!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 14 February 2005 16:25 (twenty years ago)

TWICE, twice now Almeida has refused the crown! God he's so much cooler than Jack it's not even funny.

It was nice to see someone - the ethereal, incredible mom, who always looks to be somewhere between a gin stupor and nirvana - go toe-to-toe with Jack. Jack still comes out on the moral high-ground of course, like the snivelling, superior uber-male that he is ("does anyone doubt me??" I can hear him yelling. "I can sum up the plot more efficiently than ANYONE IN THIS ROOM!") but she put him right in his place. She got a pardon from the President (that I doubt she'll live to see) in exchange for.. what exactly?? She didn't really help them at all. By the time they got to the hospital it was too late and in fact it would have been 1000000x better had the kid stayed put right where he was. Idiot Jack.

And what of the porn analyst who got tasered in the neck, did everyone just forget about her? No wonder one of the nuclear plants melted down, CTU was too busy electrocuting its own people!

Who wants to bet that the SecDef's son does something supa-crazy to aid the terrorists as a result of his prolonged exposure to the CTU Rave Helmet?

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 00:19 (twenty years ago)

Shohreh is so amazing, she's a league above pretty much any other actor on the show.

TH OTM re secdef's son, we haven't seen the last of him. Maybe he and the araz kid smoke weed together.

teeeny, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 01:45 (twenty years ago)

ten bucks says Secdefson works as a waiter in that restaurant that the Mummy runs (because it was a restaurant back room, if I recall, where Bad Father and the Mummy were meeting)

Actually the kid is the one who was going to get the pardon, not the mom. She was particularly good in last night's episode, yeah.

I liked how this one ended, with the "Did you get all that?" line. Very effective.

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 01:53 (twenty years ago)

ten bucks says Secdefson works as a waiter in that restaurant that the Mummy runs (because it was a restaurant back room, if I recall, where Bad Father and the Mummy were meeting)

I think that would be too clever. I'd like it if that was true, though.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 13:48 (twenty years ago)

Definitely the last episode was Shohreh's shining moment thus far on the show, especially that last scene (and Jack going "did you get that?" only served to underline how great she was).

The void left by David Palmer is starting to become apparent to me. Not that 24 absolutely needs a moral center, but in a strange kinda way, he made the US worth saving. The way the current President and the SOD ooze smarm and general creepiness just kinda make me feel "they get what's coming to them".

Mason was the best CTU director, hands down. I also liked Ryan Chapelle (not director) because he was so over-the-top bureaucratic.

alex in montreal, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 15:37 (twenty years ago)

Palmer's coming back for the last five episodes of the season!

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:12 (twenty years ago)

SEXIEST MAN ALIVE

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)

HE IS THE PRESIDENT OF MY CROTCH

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)

do you get all shuddery when he says "it's called a swoop and squat" in that car insurance ad?

Riot Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

I keep wanting to say "he is the President of my crotch" in conversation but I can never find the right moment.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 21 February 2005 01:46 (twenty years ago)

THREE TIMES Almeida has refused the crown!@

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 14:23 (twenty years ago)

Extremely disappointing business with Aisha. Now who will Curtis glower at???

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 00:47 (twenty years ago)

Sorry if I keep going on. But my flatmates refuse to watch this with me, since they missed like the first seven episodes. I was like "dude it's not rocket science" but they're adamant.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 00:48 (twenty years ago)

keep going on!

this show's more unpredictable this season early on than the other three were.

Really, I'm beginning to think CTU needs more backup! And how many people work there in Field Ops? How many times has someone gone to an office with a suspect, only to be waylaid by shady characters? It's happened twice this season already! Body count's pretty high if you're in the field and your name isn't Bauer or Almeida.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 03:06 (twenty years ago)

The 'Jack does Mission Impossible' was excellent, as was Sarah bitching back at Miss Driscoll.

The only cringeworthy moment was Behrooz picking up the gun and doing the inevitable... but the goatee baddie that turned up, I really want to know who he was. I like Curtis, I hope he doesn't turn into the sort of CTU agent that gets to go out into the field only to get offed at the first possible chance.

Maybe my IQ level dropped by 20 points, but I was genuinely mystified by that hour, and that's something that '24' hasn't done in a long time.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 04:34 (twenty years ago)

I'm convinced Soulpatch is going to eat it.

Also re: POTUS I's return... ARARGH, SPOILERS!

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 04:35 (twenty years ago)

That said, the speech that Nina Araz gave to Jack at the end of the previous week's episode is probably one of the top three bits of dialogue on '24' ever.

And Jack Bauer getting run over and hardly even flinching was so fucking cool...

Apparently episode twelve - eleven is next week - is the big one to look forward to. I have absolutely no idea what's going to happen, and I intend to keep it that way until I see it.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 04:39 (twenty years ago)

Though, thinking about it, THEY HAVE DINA ARAZ IN CUSTODY AND YET THEY'RE CHASING AROUND LA AFTER COMPUTER FILES AND EX-HUSBANDS?

Surely she should know more shit than they've already asked her? Typical CTU interogation: "Do you know where the override is?" "No" "OK then, now we'll question you off-screen where you can tell us absolutely nothing that will come up in future episodes whilst we send Jack off on completely unrelated leads that just happen to come up trumps."

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 04:43 (twenty years ago)

HE IS THE PRESIDENT OF MY CROTCH

Teeny (& anyone for whom Dennis Haysbert is POYC) - check out Suture if you haven't already. It's an early 90s arty film-noir mistaken-identity thing by the guys that made The Deep End, & DH is pretty good (& HOTT) in it.

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 04:43 (twenty years ago)

I know it sounds pretty heartless, but I could not give two shits about Driscoll's daughter.

I mean, why? What was the point?

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 2 March 2005 04:33 (twenty years ago)

distraction, and to have a reason for Almeida to CLAIM THE CROWN ONCE MORE

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 2 March 2005 05:09 (twenty years ago)

The point was to have another totally annoying and utterly pointless sideplot. 24 is all about "family," see. I love how the fucking doctors were like "your schizophrenic daughter is totally out of hand!" OH REALLY! I'M AMAZED. Why don't you send for the mom again, you know the one that the daughter can't stand? That ought to help. Jesus, if I ever get brought into the CTU clinic remind me to get transferred the fuck out of there.

Alex in Montreal totally totally OTM about President Slimer and the moral vacuum. I've come around to like it this way, though. Rather than having the alternate-universe President who makes all the opposite decisions that the current bonehead in power would (cf. the entirety of Season 2) (cf. the West Wing), they're dealing with the same thing we're dealing with, a prez who sets his jaw with appropriate grimness but doesn't appear to actually have a handle on anything, or even particularly care.

One of the fascinating things for me about this show is what a vulnerable country they make the US: 24's America has, yes, had a nuclear reactor melt down as a result of terrorism, a hotel full of people killed by terrorists, an actual nuclear weapon detonated, as well as any number of neighborhood-clearing hard and soft perimeters and evacuations and F-15s called in etc, but also appears to have dozens and dozens of terrorist cells operating at any given time, which CTU tracks to some degree but basically has no proper info on. They're so casual about it! "See if he has any connection to any other cells operating around Los Angeles." WHAT??

On a slightly related tip, it was funny to see Racist Jack at the end of that last episode. Woops. (Of course any terrorist worth his salt ought to have a solitaire screensaver available at the touch of a key. "Play the four of diamonds. I want to see that game work, buddy. PLAY IT. PLAY IT NOW!!")

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 2 March 2005 06:24 (twenty years ago)

I have this theory that they're going to wipe out President Slimer and his staff somehow.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 2 March 2005 06:49 (twenty years ago)

...
Does the Season 2 DVD include the ten-minute Ford commercial from the first episode?

dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 2 March 2005 12:33 (twenty years ago)

just putting in to say that the "did you get that" cliffhanger was incredible. really good judgement by the writers, or maybe they edited like that cos of misses terrorists performance.

I am loving this series. bitTorrent is my new friend.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 2 March 2005 13:17 (twenty years ago)

Maybe it was the shirt and the angle, but that's the first time I've noticed Tony's gut when he was interrogating Mother Araz.

I'm actually warming up to Curtis (the neck snap has always been my favourite kill method on any show, see Angel/Buffy). Heck, I was getting used to Driscoll as CTU director.

I really want to see Edgar withhold any sympathy and go all "what goes around comes around, bitch" when he learns that her daughter is dead.

alex in montreal, Wednesday, 2 March 2005 14:43 (twenty years ago)

Edgar: "I really need you to get back to work, Ms Driscoll. What would your daughter want you to do? G'won, make her proud of you."

dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 2 March 2005 15:04 (twenty years ago)

HA HA

Tony's gut: real or not? Only his stylist knows for sure.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 2 March 2005 15:44 (twenty years ago)

Curtis's fight scene was a really kick-ass moment, I was yelling at the TV set, just like "yeah, yeah!" I couldn't remember if he was supposed to be dead or not, but whatever, he obviously wasn't. I still don't get the myriad situations where people are supposed to have work relationships with their exes or whatever. I mean beyond the fact that this never works in any office, isn't it like a HUGE security risk (cf. Tony at the end of Season 3 for starters)??

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 2 March 2005 19:11 (twenty years ago)

the usual "evil Americans in effect" storyline came into play tonight, but this was extremely effective! A very tense bit of cat-and-mouse near the end in a visually compelling setting. Almeida had the crown! But it was taken away by Michelle Dessler, who returns to be HOT once again.

okay and based on that little bit of dialogue between the Mummy and his Lexus minion, I'm thinking one of my theories might have merit.

oh and also, a friend of mine was recently interviewed for a job on "24". They hinted at an all-but-official green light for season 5.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 06:51 (twenty years ago)

JBowWow23: OMG this place is t0tally melting down WTF
ToniTonyTone: :(
EdgarStyles: Haha pwn3d suckaz

The Obligatory Sourpuss (Begs2Differ), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)

Hop in a time machine, get out, it's babylon, root of civilization, ask "sheep's thigh, roasted, between two thin pieces of your finest unleavened" dumbass euphrates-bathing motherfucker stares at you like you're the retard. Explain at length, finally get what you want, hop back in time machine, come back, hallelujah

-- TOMBOT (hallmar...) (webmail), March 8th, 2005. (link)

[....]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

wtf does the robotic penis have to do with bread, someone might've asked, before I did.

-- Allyzay Dallas Multi-Pass (allyza...) (webmail), March 8th, 2005. (link)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 21:31 (twenty years ago)

Hahahahaha Okay this was really not the thread I thought it was.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 21:32 (twenty years ago)

The EMP shit was dumb.

I've guessed what the terrorist's main aim is going to be. It was obvious when the guy said 'Air Force base'.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 04:15 (twenty years ago)

It seems to me that the main thing the EMP did was MAKE THE LIGHTS FLICKER ON AND OFF in a SCARY FASHION. This was easily the most Ed Wood episode yet!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 10 March 2005 16:31 (twenty years ago)

I'd love to see a spin-off called "CTU: HR" about what in the hell goes into these staff decisions.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 10 March 2005 18:36 (twenty years ago)

how long has the prez been in the air, anyway?

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 10 March 2005 18:39 (twenty years ago)

If you are missing Chloe, she has turned up as a cast member on Fox's "Kelsey Grammar presents the Sketch Show"

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Monday, 14 March 2005 03:07 (twenty years ago)

haha boy did I turn that off fast!

teeny (teeny), Monday, 14 March 2005 03:14 (twenty years ago)

That show looked so fucking lame - all I saw were the ads- .. it should have been hosted by Ed McMahon on ABC .. You'd think they'd put something funny in the ads .. my God, I can't believe they even tried to run a show that awful.

But Arrested Development was one of the best ever last night.

dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 14 March 2005 12:47 (twenty years ago)

did they kill wonderful Chloe off then? i haven't got the patience/energy to watch the fourth series

Sven Bastard (blueski), Monday, 14 March 2005 13:08 (twenty years ago)

She got fired for helping Jack behind the boss's back.

dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 14 March 2005 13:10 (twenty years ago)

"I'm not sure about this new office manager"

"Why?"

"He killed my wife and tied me to the bottom of a fishing boat"

"Well he's the best we've got, so try and get along"

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 14 March 2005 15:31 (twenty years ago)

I'm not going to watch this tonight I don't think. The commercials come close to ruining it for me. I've just about had it with commercials. After a year of Radio 4 and commercial-free Daily Show torrents, and now, watching all s0rtz of programs on DVD, ads have gone from imperceptible to jarring to enough to make me just stop watching whatever it is and do something else. In the US there are people whose job it is to strip out every frame of black/blank tape at the beginning/end of ads (in the UK, and many other European countries, the last moment on the ad is often simply frozen on-screen for a good 10 or 20 seconds, rather than fading to black; i guess they figure if someone falls asleep at the controls they'd rather have a freeze frame of THEIR ad on-screen; this often leads to weird-looking ad endings, where something that had flowed along naturally suddenly comes crashing to a weird frozen halt rather than disappearing once it's had its time on stage, like a good little boy or girl) - anyway these people strip out every single "wasted second" of air time in an effort to cram in as much ad time as possible. with this technique the networks and cable channels have reclaimed about a minute or two per hour. but in their zealotry they OFTEN cut the last half-second or so off of things, and there's never ANY KIND of smooth transition from program to ad, not even so much as a fade-out, it's just like CUT. it's got so bad that occasionally, depending on the type of show, i've actually thought the ad was part of the program. which is actually hilarious but still. it just rubs me the wrong way. I think I'm just going to get a Tivo and connect it straight into my computer.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:38 (twenty years ago)

what in the hell are you talking about? ffwd!

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:42 (twenty years ago)

My TV doesn't have that button, and my flatmate doesn't have a VCR. I don't think they make VCRs that are shiny and/or digital enough for him. Actually now that I think about it, I could probably replicate the functionality of a Tivo w/a TV tuner card, a big-ass hard drive, and some shareware?

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:45 (twenty years ago)

Tony: "then GET ON IT"

me: "EEP"

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:46 (twenty years ago)

i think so (xpost)

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:47 (twenty years ago)

i have no intention of WATCHING any of 24 ever again after series one, but i need to carry on reading tracer discussion it plz thx bye

mark s (mark s), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:47 (twenty years ago)

"Some people are more comfortable in hell!"

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 02:57 (twenty years ago)

Tracer, you are describing televisual FLOW. I'd like to know where I can find out about the mentalists you describe who strip out the "wasted" blank spaces in adverts, actually.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 03:54 (twenty years ago)

I've guessed what the terrorist's main aim is going to be. It was obvious when the guy said 'Air Force base'.

I reckon from the end of that episodes I was probably right, right?

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 04:34 (twenty years ago)

I pwned you by a week on that guess, James!

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 04:54 (twenty years ago)

you guys should check out the 24 character power rankings at http://soidisantra.typepad.com...it's my friend's blog, but they're pretty entertaining

Zack Richardson (teenagequiet), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 05:35 (twenty years ago)

uh, sorry, that didn't quite work. let's try it again: http://soidisantra.typepad.com

Zack Richardson (teenagequiet), Wednesday, 16 March 2005 05:36 (twenty years ago)

Last night's was a good one. I like how Marwan fucked with CTU and seems to be playing these games to distract them from what's next. And no more Mrs. Araz! Oh well.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 22:53 (twenty years ago)

poor Dina! although I don't think you actually saw her take the bullet, and the 24 site only says that Marwan ordered her killed. < /faint hope>

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 22:54 (twenty years ago)

The ice-cold dispatching of the hapless pilot was a great moment.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 March 2005 22:56 (twenty years ago)

Aye, that was a top class episode. The 'commit adultery, pay with your life' morale especially. It only could have been better with the woman being season one's Naked Mandy instead.

The only sucky thing was that you knew Jack wouldn't be killed, much in the same way that you know he's a hostage but he'll find some way to escape, or CTU will catch up with him, or whatever.

Why do I get the weird feeling that William Devane will be made President by the end of the season?

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:20 (twenty years ago)

I think Dina would have pulled the trigger on Jack - having her turn the gun was bullshit, and not her character. And I have no idea why Marwan handed her an empty gun. And anyway, Dina should have said, "Why do you want me to kill him? What good is a dead hostage? Get a brain, Marwans."

dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 12:32 (twenty years ago)

as long as there are terrorists looking like this and ctu agents looking like that im not rooting for the good guys.

bass braille (....), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 13:12 (twenty years ago)

no talking bad 'bout chloe!!!!!!!!!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)

yeah it didn't make sense that she wouldn't have killed jack; this woman totally, ice-cold, killed a little girl earlier in the day. i think they've slowly made her kind of sympathetic, but everyone still remembers that, so they really had to kill her off.

next week looks ridiculous. why does marwan want baruz?

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 14:47 (twenty years ago)

eh, I bought Dina's actions, although I would have bought it if she had shot Jack too. It's kind of like the movie A Simple Plan in reverse, she was totally hard-core in the beginning but took one step off the path and now it's snowballed into being all about her son instead of about the cause.

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 14:51 (twenty years ago)

She should have known that turning the gun on Marwan would not be a successful strategy. So her next best option was to kill Jack & save herself.

dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)

No but see, secondary characters like Dina are simply implements in advancing the plot vis-a-vis the main characters aka Jack. So there's really no "out of character"-ness possible with secondary characters.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)

In that case, she and Jack should have fallen in love.

dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 19:11 (twenty years ago)

I figure that Dina didn't know whether CTU lost track of them or not. If they were still watching and she executes Jack, there goes her son.

alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 19:29 (twenty years ago)

Well exactly, Dina was in an impossible situation. It was one of those scenes where you run through the possibilities afterwards, seeing if any of them work. There were several, but none of them were very good. It's hard to see what she was thinking though: would Jack suddenly spring up and take care of the fourteen heavily armed religious fanatics who had them surrounded??

BTW it's easy to explain why Marwan doesn't put a bullet in the gun: you expect him to hand a loaded gun to someone he thinks is setting him up?? That Dina didn't twig to this, or make dave's point about the uselessness of a dead hostage to Marwan or, I don't know, at least test whether the gun was loaded by shooting Jack in the leg first - which would have exposed Marwan's ruse - well, all of this goes to show that the sciptwriters REALLY needed her out of the picture for some reason right now, or needed to get her to change her role.. because let's face it, having Dina as a mole working next to Marwan but against him, slipping out every now and again to ring Jack up on his mobile, would have been FANTASTIC.

I'm starting to think Dina's death is all an ELABORATE RUSE!! partly because it helps me think Dina is alive, which I desperately want, but also because of all the foreshadowing dropped in the pre-op conference: "she's a master of deception, she'll be able to pull this off" "let's just hope she doesn't deceive US" - then the flashes of the gun barrel after she fails Marwan's test, but her body conveniently out of sight? hhhmmMMM!

God the scene where she leaves her unbelievable drip of a son behind, in the CTU holding chamber, was just heartbreaking, and almost overwhelming. The way she kept rubbing his hands, rubbing his face. The look she gave him as she walked away!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)

Other things I've been liking:

1) the subtle but unmistakable growth of Edgar's stubble (most other male characters deal w/this possible continuity nightmare by having a) permanent five o'clock shadow (cf Almeida) b) a beard (cf Mason) c) naturally blond hair that doesn't really show up (cf Jack) d) two X chromosomes or e) give every impression of having no naturally-occurring body hair (cf Curtis))

2) the fact that Tony and Michelle's lines are obviously just divided up from Driscoll's old lines, except with extra meaningful lingering at the end

3) CHLOE!!! (er, did she go to the tanning booth after getting fired??) the look on her face, her reaction when Michelle called her back into work was such a brilliant portrayal of all the confused emotions - anger at being yanked around, pleasure at being valued - most likely because she wasn't TRYIN for those emotions but just generally tryina "get respect" or something, focusing on the action, good girl!!!

Things i'm not likin so much:

1) what teeny said about all the women being either evil or idiotic; this doesn't hold for CTU payroll though; the women there are bad-ass and often funny

2) the depressingly similar point that (with the very very big exception of Dina) every Arab character is incredibly DRIPPY, either they're bumbling villains or they're cardboard patriots.. do the scriptwriters imagine that humor and personality are distinctly un-Arab qualities? this is racism in action, ppl

3) what is the fucking point of audrey raines

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 20:14 (twenty years ago)

Oh btw how about Jack not telling his shell-shocked girlfriend about his new undercover mission wherein he plans to get himself captured ON PURPOSE by the man who's just melted down a nuclear reactor, tried to kill her and her father, and (indirectly) critically wounded her ex-husband? "She's been through enough today" - gawd I was just waiting for the Secretary of Defense to go "DON'T CONTRADICT ME, SHE'S MY DAUGHTER AND I'M THE SECRETARY OF GODDAMN DEFENSE, NOW GO TELL HER WHAT'S GOING ON" (that is, if he were allowed to curse). Personally I think Jack's jealous, and is petulantly hoping that he is injured or even dies so as to one-up his rival in love "and she'll be sorry then"

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 22:10 (twenty years ago)

"Inappropriately blunt"! Chloe, I want to have your lemon-faced babies!

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 02:35 (twenty years ago)

This season is ace and Habib Marwan is clearly the best villain the show has had, especially considering he started out as this dull behind-the-scenes bad guy.

I like how the exchange--the focus of this entire episode, really--was merely to distract CTU from the next bit of business, which will be oh-so-sweet if they go all the way with it.

The characters this season have been smarter than in seasons past, with a nice lack of bureaucratic tomfoolery. At least until Zombie Ryan Chappelle shows up to question Michelle about Sarah Gavin's firing.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 05:16 (twenty years ago)

Haha my blog got a hit with a search for "habib marwan fan fiction."

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 02:33 (twenty years ago)

Marwan better get away this season. they always catch the bad guys, he deserves to be the show's undying SUPERVILLAN

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 02:38 (twenty years ago)

As long as Marwan suceeds with his latest objective. And Edgar should be royally fucked if that does go down. Tony gets life in the slammer for helping save his life, whereas Edgar completely ignores the one lead CTU that'll stop the terrorists blowing the President out of the sky. They'll probably executive the poor fatty.

Serves him right for keeping the red CD-R on top of the blue CD-R and the purple CD-R all that time. I thought he'd get the mixed up, or drop them all, or something, and have to slap his head and go 'Uh, OH NO!".

I like the way how that Division sends that Buchanan guy into CTU especially to deal with this lame Behrooz/Bauer swop, but do they bother when someone tries to kidnap the Secretary of Defense, then blow up 103 nuclear power stations? "Nah, we'll stay at our office, thanks."

And how where they expecting to trace the terrorists in their van back to Marwan when they've closed off every road in a two mile radius, shot the rooftop assassin guy and started chasing them in a CTU van?

And Reiko Aylesworth's plastic surgery is fucking terrible. She's definitely had some work done. Maybe that's why they got in Alberta Watson for the first part of the season, to let Michelle's horrible botox-y face lift settle offscreen.

All Tony seems to do now is exposition. Chloe gets the same, but with added sarcasm.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 03:32 (twenty years ago)

"Tony gets life in the slammer for helping save his wife", even.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 03:39 (twenty years ago)

Ugh. Too many typos to correct, sorry. I'm going to bed.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 03:43 (twenty years ago)

Oh I don't blame Edgar for not reviewing those hourly police reports. I'm surprised that it would be "lead tactical"s job to go through flagged items in an hourly dispatch from the crime blotter, and if it is, it shouldn't be. I can only assume Gear! is joking about a "lack of bureaucratic tomfoolery" - I mean this is the show where they finally go through what it would be REALLY like at one of these places, where each hunch someone has doesn't always turn out to be the gossamer strand that keeps the trail intact, where every wild goose chase doesn't always turn up trumps. There's only one solution to problems like this at every workplace, but especially one that's supposed to deal with emergencies on a regular basis: hire enough qualified people.

Oh and HAHA EVERYONE'S A TORTURER NOW. Except maybe Michelle, although she did shoot that poor tourist in the back last season for no good reason other than teaching everybody a lesson. I would be saddened to learn that Reiko Aylesworth has had surgery on her face, it's such a nice one. I see a difference too, but I'm not sure it's surgery. She doesn't do that head-tilt thing any more! Remember how she used to crane her whole head over at like a 45-degree angle for no good reason? It used to drive me wild. She doesn't do that any more. She's gotten more severe and more professional. :(

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 05:19 (twenty years ago)

I'm not sure who the hell that Buchanan guy is either, but it lends an extra little workplace dynamic that's nice. 24 is at least as much about being at work as it is about terrorism.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 05:22 (twenty years ago)

I guess I mean there's no ridiculous internal affairs crap going on, which I was always annoyed by. Maybe it died with Ryan Chappelle?

It's really interesting what they're doing with Edgar. He was the hero who a) stopped the meltdown b) exposed Maryann Taylor c) backed up Chloe when she was helping Jack. Now he's a bumbling fool! I love it. I really hope the next episode ends like I hope it will.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 07:12 (twenty years ago)

I really hope the next episode ends in the darkest manner possible, I should say. Which is what should happen!

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 07:13 (twenty years ago)

I think everybody watching - apart from the idiotic 'patriot' types - wants what should happen to actually happen.

The closer the shows gets towards it, though, the less likely I think it is that they will actually carry it out...

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 10:48 (twenty years ago)

What is "it"?

Mike Patton (tracerhand), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 16:25 (twenty years ago)

hahahahaha is all i have to say

Sven Basted (blueski), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 16:33 (twenty years ago)

i ALWAYS fall asleep during the last ten minute of the show. I blame my w33d intake.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 16:34 (twenty years ago)

Things are really heating up after all that Mclennan Forester pulse bomb stuff.

Anyone think that Anderson attacking Air Force One is a little bit predictable? I'm thinking it would be more interesting if it was a suicide mission - ie he either crashes his plane into 1) air force one 2) the white house 3) ctu

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:20 (twenty years ago)

I can't believe we've traded Dina-playing-both-sides for BEHROOZ-playing-both sides. WE WUZ ROBBED

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:31 (twenty years ago)

it won't be a suicide mission--marwan told him 'time to make your money' or something like that.

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)

Ok maybe he parachutes out at the last second, or he wasn't intending to go on a suicide mission but it ends up being one.

If he did crash into/demolish CTU, it would give the show a good reason to relocate to somewhere else next season...

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)

plus that mechanic told him, "You can't land this thing, you'd have to parachute out", and the pilot practically said, "That's exactly the point, bwahahaha!"

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)

stealth bomber HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

obv

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 21:46 (twenty years ago)

"Hey that new mechanic they brought in for the second opinion looks a lot like that pilot who came in 20 minutes ago to fly that bombing mission somewhere in the area of Air Force One. Hmm."

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 23:09 (twenty years ago)

I think the President will land somewhere to meet William Devane (to discuss their connections to the terrorists, maybe?), CTU will catch wind of this bomber, Jack Bauer gets sent in and nobody dies. Once again.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 30 March 2005 23:29 (twenty years ago)

"Hey that new mechanic they brought in for the second opinion looks a lot like that pilot who came in 20 minutes ago to fly that bombing mission somewhere in the area of Air Force One. Hmm."

Yeah, I expected the mechanic supervisor to say, "....aaaand, who the hell are you?"

How is it that they can "send" live satellite feeds from a computer to a Palm, but the LAPD hourlies are on a CD-R ?

dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 31 March 2005 00:57 (twenty years ago)

The CD-R is actually just a giant jpeg of the "crime blotter"

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 31 March 2005 00:58 (twenty years ago)

"Chloe, I think you should see this: Boys bike taken from an unlocked garage!"

dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 31 March 2005 01:03 (twenty years ago)

"Chloe, I think you should see this: This guy I went to high school with was busted for robbing a convenience store! He was always an asshole, haha."

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 31 March 2005 01:11 (twenty years ago)

Have we all seen the trailer for the '24' Playstation 2 game yet?

Hit http://www.playstationstudios.com/24 with username 'preview' and the password 'C3%qt24'

It's set between the end of season two and the beginning of season three. We're going to find out what happened to Naked Mandy, Alexander Trepkos, Max and Palmer's hand.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Thursday, 31 March 2005 02:38 (twenty years ago)

naked mandy better come back

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 31 March 2005 02:39 (twenty years ago)

I seriously cannot wait to see this week's episode. It's being hyped as 'the most controversial in all four seasons of the show'. Sadly, I know I'm going to be let down, though.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Sunday, 3 April 2005 23:58 (twenty years ago)

Well, they are only promoting it that way because FOX knows they are going to lose a lot of their audience to the NCAA college basketball final which is happening at the same time on Monday night. That's why they are re-running the episode on Friday and Sunday.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Monday, 4 April 2005 04:15 (twenty years ago)

Hands in the air! Hold tight private caller.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Monday, 4 April 2005 23:58 (twenty years ago)

it was okay, the one a couple of seasons ago where the bomb went off affected me more.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 01:30 (twenty years ago)

I think the rest of the board has been stunned to stupefaction by that video link.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 03:19 (twenty years ago)

fucking A

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 03:57 (twenty years ago)

OMG NEED MP3 NOW

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 12:45 (twenty years ago)

hell yeah! that president was a wet blanket anyway and his son looked like a preppie dork. I had a feeling this would happen since they never bothered to develop him in a way that would make the viewer care whether he lived or died.

this is by far the best season of this show.

whatever happened to william devane's son?

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)

what kind of computer systems are they supposed to be using everywhere? some flavor of unix (the file directory structure of the hard drive Jack plugged in had Unix permissions visible on it, but nothing else looked familiar). I hate it when these shows have people get access to the "files" that seem to exist independant of any actual application.

arthe secret override code was kind of farfetched.

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 17:57 (twenty years ago)

http://search-wise.net/

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)

Lot of sketchy ideology in this episode.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:27 (twenty years ago)

I AM NOT READING THIS YET. my bitTorrent much slower this week. still downloading :-(

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 21:29 (twenty years ago)

24 theme remix mp3 4MB http://s23.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=39XVYOCEA6DZJ1KXHSX3DVZXE4

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 23:43 (twenty years ago)

yay for audio hijack, and yay for james link above.

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 23:45 (twenty years ago)

Download at your own risk

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 23:45 (twenty years ago)

the following happens between 3am (eternal) and one perfect sunrise

Jaunty Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 5 April 2005 23:55 (twenty years ago)

Argh

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 00:06 (twenty years ago)

OMG Jaunty

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 00:18 (twenty years ago)

Episode sixteen in no way lived up to my expectations.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 02:05 (twenty years ago)

whatever happened to william devane's son?

He's busy being Ryan's delinquent brother on The O.C. In terms of more recent missing sons, where's Behrooz? Not that it matters, I guess, now that the President's blowed up and all.

I like how all the new CTU characters have been weeded out and replaced with the old Season 3 folk (except for Edgar, but he's delightful). Although I wonder if any of them are going to get a Day 5 after the incredible cock-up they just made.

brooke edel (brookedel), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 02:56 (twenty years ago)

I think Edgar and the VP are related. Man, talk about grace under pressure.

alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 18:24 (twenty years ago)

i assume baruz is dead since they lost track of the trackers

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 18:43 (twenty years ago)

ASSUME NOTHING

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 18:54 (twenty years ago)

How the hell are they going to bring Palmer back?

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)

Bottom of the ninth, down by one and a man on.

Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)

Devane's son is going to show up and peel off his face and it's going to be Palmer.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 19:45 (twenty years ago)

I take it that Palmer is going to have to advise VP Charles rather than turn up to be the big bad mega-baddie behind all the terror.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 21:24 (twenty years ago)

Kyle: When they lost signal from the tackers there was a short scene where you saw Beruz put his hand to the back of his head and look at the blood on his fingers, if he were dead they probably would have made more of a deal of it. I reckon he still has a hand to play later on...
(many xposts)

Craig Gilchrist (Craig Gilchrist), Wednesday, 6 April 2005 21:44 (twenty years ago)

"TEAM A AND B REPORT IN NOW!"

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Monday, 11 April 2005 01:41 (twenty years ago)

Much better than $ylv3s3r $tall0ne Brand Canned Ham.

Curious George (1/6 Scale Model) (Rock Hardy), Monday, 11 April 2005 02:25 (twenty years ago)

Wow, that must be a record for a CTU agent accompanying Jack getting killed. I totally blinked and missed him getting shot. You figured that if the football was SO important, they'd do better than give Jack just that one fairy to back him up.

I'm now resigned to the fact that I no longer care about swerves and plotlines and that I tune in every week just to see Jack Bauer kill people. Lots of people.

alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:46 (twenty years ago)

man, those poor hippies. They were so together though! "do you have a compasss and a flashlight??!!?" "Yes!!!"

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 12 April 2005 14:06 (twenty years ago)

That was a great episode: Jack's bullet in the tin can trick, how to disable a hidden radio transponder using only a flashlight, a compass and a rock, not to mention - not only his WTF? return - but the fact that Mike Novick and Jack are phone buddies.

Also mimimal 'oh Chloe/Edgar you're so zany' and 'oh when will Tony/Michelle/Buchanan or Jack/Audrey/Paul get back together etc' moments.

I don't get it.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 02:24 (twenty years ago)

I want to see more of hot hippie chick.

I predict Bayrooz turns out to be Habib's right-hand man.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 05:03 (twenty years ago)

Perhaps the new president will choose Palmer as the new VP.

(Note: I didn't watch any of the preview commercials which seems to give away the entire next episode)

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 05:38 (twenty years ago)

Would that make sense to choose someone across the party lines?

alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 14:07 (twenty years ago)

C'mon you liberal sissies! You're not going to let gross civil liberties violations shut you all up, are you??

Organized Crime (Leee), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 02:22 (twenty years ago)

I was hoping they would torture the Amnesty guy. "Who called you?!"

diedre mousedropping (Dave225), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 13:37 (twenty years ago)

I was sure Jack was gonna step in and shoot everybody. I'm too de-sensitized when I consider breaking fingers to be lame.

I might be in the minority, but I really enjoyed this episode. Nothing like bureaucratic tension to mix things up!

alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 15:13 (twenty years ago)

it was good!

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)

It was a good ep. I was hoping jack was just gonna go all "Jack Bauer" on the Amnesty dude, then beat something outta the other guy, but I guess his was worked well enough!

Craig Gilchrist (Craig Gilchrist), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 18:00 (twenty years ago)

I'm just ashamed that I recognised that bald Amnesty 'Global' guy from Sex In The City.

Somebody shoot me please...

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Thursday, 21 April 2005 01:05 (twenty years ago)

Does anyone else find it mildly disturbing that the actor who plays Marwan has his skin 'darkened two or three shades' with make-up?

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 01:04 (twenty years ago)

I thought for sure Chloe was done for at the end of this episode.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 01:06 (twenty years ago)

I was worried about that as well. Well done, Chloe!

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 03:59 (twenty years ago)

terrorists hang out at clubs where nobody dances = my worst suspicions are confirmed

fe zaffe (fezaffe), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 21:22 (twenty years ago)

Okay, the whereabouts of SecDefHeller are beginning to intrigue me. I sort of hope next episode they cut to a shot of him at the airport, checking his watch, muttering, "Where's Air Force One?"

And Bayrooooz, what of Bheyruhz?

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 22:06 (twenty years ago)

Edgar and Chloe are IN LOVE!

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 23:49 (twenty years ago)

Edgar would be the wife in that couple, mos def

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 26 April 2005 23:54 (twenty years ago)

I like the idea that former Presidents spend their time having security briefings, staying up until 2AM watching Fox News and helping out their dumbfuck successors.

At first last season I thought Keeler was meant to represent Bush, but it's obvious that it's Logan who's based on real life.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 03:17 (twenty years ago)

I can hear Mitch Anderson now:
"Man, no one even cares that I shot down Air Force One and nearly killed the president. What do I have to do for people to notice me?"

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 07:03 (twenty years ago)

Mitch Anderson was shot down!

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 07:04 (twenty years ago)

offscreen, naturally.

Also, I like Buchanan! He's like an incredibly decisive, rule-bending version of Ryan Chappelle.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 07:05 (twenty years ago)

Was he really shot down? I must have missed that.

I've grown to like Buchanan over the past couple hours.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 07:21 (twenty years ago)

I liked Buchanan 'til I found out he wasn't knockin' Michelle.

Craig Gilchrist (Craig Gilchrist), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 09:08 (twenty years ago)

I kinda wish Logan would stick around and screw things up more; it adds a new tension and it's different from past seasons where Palmer would just allow CTU to do whatever's necessary.

Why are non-Bauer/Curtis field agents so useless? Has any of these escorts ever get out of there alive? It's like a dead giveaway when they're like "hey, go to location X. Newstead and Johnson will accompany you".

alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:24 (twenty years ago)

At first last season I thought Keeler was meant to represent Bush, but it's obvious that it's Logan who's based on real life.

Given how much the show's been emphasizing a right wing ideology, I thought Logan's being coded as not-conservative, ie an indecisive pushover leftist.

Organized Crime (Leee), Wednesday, 27 April 2005 12:28 (twenty years ago)

Bauer "going civilian" wouldn't hold up for a second in court, I suspect. I will be dismayed but not shocked if none of CTU's totally wrong hunches about who ought to be tortured comes back to haunt anyone. It's convenient that desperate lead #228 just happened to be gold-plated info, and just happened to be the one where "Amnesty Global" gets played for a sucker by the most evil terrorist mastermind, well, ever, and delays/foils CTU's interrogation with out-of-touch bleeding-heart Old-Europe faffing re: the "rule of law," whatever that is. It's not surprising at all that the series finds itself in this corner. It's always held that individual rights - to life, liberty, much less the pursuit of happiness - don't amount to anything in the face of the possibility that "millions and millions" of Americans will die. Before the advent of weapons of mass destruction, perhaps, these tenets of civilization might have held fast under the fiercest of contingencies, or at least should have, but the series hypothesizes that these rights no longer obtain. It's the "post Sep. 11" philosophy at its most cynical. The corner is, what distiguishes Jack and his buddies now from Marwan and his buddies? Quick, bring in Dennis Haysbert and let's re-find the moral center.

I was wondering about the Secretary of Defense, too. What happened to him? Maybe he's asleep. You'd think his brand of cocky get-to-itness would come in handy with this waffly flip-flopper.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 28 April 2005 04:15 (twenty years ago)

It wouldn't hold up in court but try to find a jury that would convict him!

teeny (teeny), Thursday, 28 April 2005 12:36 (twenty years ago)

So you think what Jack did was right?

The series made it very easy to sympthize with him on this one because we (although NOT Jack, nor anyone else at CTU) have heard Marwan tell his associate to kill the very man Jack and Curtis and Michelle want to torture - because he "knows too much." Given CTU's dismal track record over the past 20 hours about who really ought to be tortured (one of their own analysts; the Secretary of Defense's son; both in "crucial" situations, both of which turned out to be barking up the wrong tree) I'm kind of amazed how behind Jack you are here.

Oh one other thing, you know how pissed off Jack is about Logan's removing him from the field op, in a fit of pique (extremely temporarily, as it turns out)? "He screwed this whole thing up! Marwan's getting away because of him!" Jack splutters. I'd like someone to show me how anything would have been different had Logan not given his order. Everything would have turned out exactly the same. Yes, Marwan's goon notices "a police car" but nothing really happens until Marwan sees the reflection off Jack's RC camera in the ventilation shaft. That's not Logan's fault. When Marwan et al dash through the tunnels, how come CTU hasn't already got schematics of the escape routes available? That's not Logan's fault. When Marwan blows rubble behind him, cutting off pursuit, that's not Logan's fault either. I think Jack has a little trouble taking responsibility sometimes.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:32 (twenty years ago)

btw when henchman says "Marwan! There is a police car!" I was soooo ready for Marwan to go "that's just harbor police, they come around all the time." Maybe he thought that but didn't say it.

I forgot the big diff btw Jack's hunch about this random friend-of-a-friend of Marwan's with zero criminal record and all the other hunches that have turned out wrong - Jack's hunches are always right. Duh.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 28 April 2005 14:36 (twenty years ago)

So you think what Jack did was right?

Absolutely not. If he was a real person, I would not be behind him at all. Even watching the show, I am 'behind him' only in the sense that I enjoy watching him in action and perhaps even enjoy the conflicted feelings that his actions evoke in me (if that's the right word). HOWEVER (and again if this was actually real), I'm also glad that it's Jack making those decisions and not me, and I realize that makes me an awful person.

teeny (teeny), Thursday, 28 April 2005 21:57 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, it's crazy!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 28 April 2005 22:24 (twenty years ago)

I could do without his holier-than-thou comebackers, though. I mean, he's basically the Mel Gibson character in Lethal Weapon, can you imagine Mel getting all "I hope you can live with yourself" ugh.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 28 April 2005 22:28 (twenty years ago)

I think one of the central ideas behind the show is that Jack is essentially a psychopath who can put up a facade for awhile, but is incapable of functioning as a normal human being in the long term. I think while we're supposed to root for Jack to stop the terrorists, we're also supposed to completely understand why Audrey would think, "Okay, so this is the sort of man I should maybe stay away from..."

It's something that was hinted at in the first episode of last season, with that Kate Warner phone call; Jack puts his job and his amorality ahead of any real human relationships. I don't think we're supposed to view this as right or wrong, but instead watch him go about his business and say, "This is entertaining to watch, but that is one fucked-up guy!"

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 28 April 2005 22:57 (twenty years ago)

Look, this show is getting at -- without realizing it, I think -- a very very central thing that's happening with US foreign policy, and perhaps the world, and our own general/personal philosphies, because dammit if it's encapsulatable enough for a TV show then it's certainly got eenough currency for you and I to be able to handle as a question in our own lives -- are rules for quotidian existence and not for exceptional circumstances? Or are they precisely for the really difficulat moments when we don't know what to do? And need guidance? And this show comes down firmly on the side of: rules are for sissies! Rules are for boring moments! When things get exciting and difficult rules are to be ignored! This is NOT THE PURPOSE OF RULES. Rules are for when kids start going haywire during naptime! If things didn't get out of hand rules WOULDN'T BE NECESSARY! This show, honest to God, does not seem to understand this!

The lesson of Season 3 (or Season 2, I can't remember) was whe Palmer finally got restored to the Presidency and made the pointed anti-Bush speech to his cabinet that intelligence MUST be reliable before action is taken.

I kept expecting a similar resolution this season, with someone saying: "you must follow the law even in exceptional circumstances." It seems like the whole theme to the season.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 29 April 2005 05:27 (twenty years ago)

Although man, when Jack broke that guy's fingers I was lovin it.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 29 April 2005 05:30 (twenty years ago)

ooh it's getting dirty.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 01:12 (twenty years ago)

I am stuck at work and I cannot fathom what that means. (translation: I am now daydreaming about Chloe mmmmmmmmmmmrowrwrwr)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 01:23 (twenty years ago)

But then Kate Warner walks in with Audrey Raines and Jack, EW EW EW!!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 01:51 (twenty years ago)

ohh that was grim.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 03:58 (twenty years ago)

Incredible show tonight, especially the ending. NINJA BAUER made an appearance.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 04:00 (twenty years ago)

Rough. I'm almost hoping that this semi-breakdown similar to the end of Season 3 will lead to some hesitation and self-doubt on Jack's part for the next hour at least.

alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 12:31 (twenty years ago)

yeah he's got that crazy look in his eyes now!

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 3 May 2005 12:41 (twenty years ago)

I don't like the way how this season has this kind of 'four minutes of high drama' at the end, where the next episode could go off at any kind of tangent, instead of the usual 'twist and cliffhanger' like it's always had in the past.

That said, everything about this week's show was on top form. It'll be one of the episodes that gets put forward for the Emmys for sure. And Kiefer's little isolated 'what the fuck have I done?' face interupted by a Kim Raver slapping breakdown was ace too.

http://img134.echo.cx/img134/4277/uhoh2cz.jpg

http://img134.echo.cx/img134/4145/uhoh26ls.jpg

http://img134.echo.cx/img134/6889/uhoh34cb.jpg

http://img134.echo.cx/img134/209/uhoh48mn.jpg

http://img134.echo.cx/img134/7765/uhoh55mi.jpg

Paul Raines has to be the most shit-upon character in '24' since Janet York.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 4 May 2005 01:54 (twenty years ago)

I'm still trying to figure out why the girlfriend didn't call the terrorist guys's cell phone again (in Iowa) and CTU could have triangulated it or whatever and found all the bomb guys and we would have 4 hours left to help Audrey think through all that's happened today and decide whether she loves Jack or not because she's definitely seen him in a new light today boy howdy.

diedre mousedropping (Dave225), Thursday, 5 May 2005 01:01 (twenty years ago)

I wondered what the hell Tony's girlfriend was doing calling at 3 am after not calling for like 12 hours.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Thursday, 5 May 2005 01:53 (twenty years ago)

She was working at the bar!

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Thursday, 5 May 2005 10:29 (twenty years ago)

how come this thread isn't full of pics of Chloe in action from last weeks cliffhanger? favourite bit of the entire season EVER.

FWIW i prefer the "which way will it go" variety of cliffhanger to the "reveal twist" style

ja, Thursday, 5 May 2005 10:52 (twenty years ago)

Man, I don't understand how this can end in two episodes. Unless they redirect the missile directly towards China and wipe it out, end of story.

alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Tuesday, 10 May 2005 18:00 (twenty years ago)

maybe the terrorist engineer is an undercover agent and the missile is filled with confetti, and jack turns out to be the long lost stepson of the chinese premier

fe zaffe (fezaffe), Tuesday, 10 May 2005 18:09 (twenty years ago)

technically there are three hours left, since the finale is two hours!

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 10 May 2005 18:11 (twenty years ago)

I've got a suspicion, dudes, based on a single throwaway line that might raise no alarm bells in another show, but I know "24"....

when Tony and Michelle are in the office and Tony sees Audrey and asks, "What is she still doing here?" and Michelle says something about her trying to keep working to forget all the bad shit that's gone down.

For some reason my alarms are going off over Mrs. Raines.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 10 May 2005 18:14 (twenty years ago)

What about Heller? He's hiding? He's the Secretary of DEFENSE.

So is Berhooz dead? Gotta know for my 24 death pool.

Your Audrey suspicion is interesting, but what would her motive be? Her kidnapping didn't really seem like a set-up.

alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Tuesday, 10 May 2005 18:31 (twenty years ago)

I liked Buchanan's line when he said, "Chloe, we don't have time for your personality disorder."

Finally a cool bureaucrat in CTU! I hope he comes back next season.

I imagine the Audrey reveal would be something like this:

CHLOE: Jack it's probably nothing but Audrey was roommates with Marie Warner in college.

05:59:57
05:59:58
05:59:59
06:00:00

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 10 May 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)

Buchanan's cool, but seriously:

Mason >>> Chapelle > Buchanan

alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Tuesday, 10 May 2005 19:13 (twenty years ago)

The uber-geek tension between Chloe and Edgar has been pretty amusing this season.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Tuesday, 10 May 2005 22:53 (twenty years ago)

I tell you, they're getting ready for the sexing.

also iknewit iknewit secdef's son is coming back!

teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 11 May 2005 01:18 (twenty years ago)

as the leader of the resistance!!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 11 May 2005 01:20 (twenty years ago)

(note: i have no idea what i am talking about)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 11 May 2005 01:20 (twenty years ago)

(cause i still haven't seen this week's show)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 11 May 2005 01:38 (twenty years ago)

teeny I didn't notice a reference to SecDef's son. Was that in the "scenes from" teaser at the end, which I missed?

Why isn't anybody talking about how everyone calls Palmer "Mr. President"???? Even the credits say "President David Palmer"!! Um, he's not the President! He's an able commander called in to take control of a volatile situation that he has the experience for -- that doesn't make him "President"! They're going to get so used to saying it that one of them is going to slip and refer to him as the President to a member of the press, or to the Chinese.. and that wouldn't be good. Wouldn't it be more INTERESTING to at least play up that tension, maybe have Jack acidentally say "Mr. President" and then correct himself.. anyhow.

Palmer is more "Sherry"-like than ever before.

It would not surprised me AT ALL to find out that either Audrey, or Paul, or both of them, was a mole, thus getting Jack off the hook for his decision this week. Because rule #1 of 24 is: Jack is always right. (The Chinese guy coughing up Marwan's location already kind of justified it, though.)

I also have no doubt that the next episode will be some not-very-subtle-at-all propaganda for a missile-defense shield, unless the confetti hypothesis proves correct.

Excellent melodrama btw Tony and Michelle, and she ALMOST did the tilted-head thing again!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)

Presidents are entitled to that honorific for the rest of their life. President George Bush Sr still is called President. Same with Clinto - he's President Clinton.

crazy yanks

i hope the audrey mole theories are wrong - they're too obv like nina from series 1

i too want to know about refs to secdef's son! where?

ja (_ja_), Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)

also: TWO HOUR FINALE. blimey. only just found out about this and I am beside myself with anticipation.

ja (_ja_), Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:46 (twenty years ago)

I'm oozing with the milky white substance of two-hour finale anticipation.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 12 May 2005 19:59 (twenty years ago)

Ok, have to join in with "Two hour finale!?". That's gonna be soo good. Unless, of course the missile goes off without a hitch and it's three hours of calculating the casualties while Edgar and Chloe knock boots in the Tech Room.

Craig Gilchrist (Craig Gilchrist), Thursday, 12 May 2005 20:32 (twenty years ago)

This would disappoint you, you're saying.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 12 May 2005 21:42 (twenty years ago)

No, I'd quite like to see '24' have some balls and allow something seriously bad to happen to the US that's out of their control (instead of chickening out as with Air Force One - The story would have worked with the President being dead, and it's unlikely he would have lived after plummeting god know how far in a plane), but it'd leave 2 hours of nothing. And as much as I'd like to see Chloe and Edgar get together, I don't think they could fill 2 hours with it.

Craig Gilchrist (Craig Gilchrist), Thursday, 12 May 2005 21:46 (twenty years ago)

They could fill something else.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 12 May 2005 22:01 (twenty years ago)

And then they could have sex.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 12 May 2005 22:44 (twenty years ago)

I'm thinking Season 5 should have some amusing circumstances - no more sunshine, how about a day filled with rain/tornados/hurricanes? How about the day being a Sunday, where every place is closed and people don't want to even think about work? How about one of Jack's rogue schemes going against him, and he's now a framed fugitive on the run for murder?

I'm wondering what they will do, as I don't think they can pull off another US terrorism threat/nuclear war type plot again. This season seems to have pulled out all of the stops for that idea.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Thursday, 12 May 2005 23:56 (twenty years ago)

They're a dime a dozen, these nuke-stealing terrorists. Watching 24 you'd get the idea there are hundreds of them pottering about in the forest, fiddling with clunky old mobile missiles.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Friday, 13 May 2005 00:12 (twenty years ago)

ACTUALLY what I'd like to see is all the terrorists in the world teaming up to kill Jack. I mean, his name must be all over the fictional "24" world as the person who has foiled all the plots the past 4 seasons. Terrorists should know by now if they are going to get anything done, they have to get rid of him first.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Friday, 13 May 2005 00:17 (twenty years ago)

they're actually a very diverse employer, this unnamed group. All ethnicities have been represented.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Friday, 13 May 2005 00:18 (twenty years ago)

secdef's son was refered to (kinda vaguely) in the teaser at the end of the ep.

teeny (teeny), Friday, 13 May 2005 00:45 (twenty years ago)

just a bump, and a plea that if anyone finds a BT file for this weeks upcoming ep to post here - i'll do similar if i find one first. maybe i'm panicing - maybe i s o h u n t will still come up trumps :-/

ja (_ja_), Monday, 16 May 2005 17:18 (twenty years ago)

did anyone recognize the girl at the end from a PREVIOUS SEASON??

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 01:02 (twenty years ago)

Sexy Mandy?

L (Leee), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 01:07 (twenty years ago)

m i n i n o v a .org working well

ja (_ja_), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 04:14 (twenty years ago)

So how was the phone call from SecDefSon's cell phone key to Marwan's plot?

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 04:20 (twenty years ago)

They set up the Richard's cell phone to be able to trace all of his calls. That's how they found out where Heller was in the morning.

Mandy is still darn sexy....

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 05:07 (twenty years ago)

I still don't trust that Audrey Raines.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 05:12 (twenty years ago)

this was a fucking sappy episode. too much love talk. Fuck that shit, I want a missle to hit a city and the streets to run with blood.

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 05:19 (twenty years ago)

"He was responsible for her husband's death and now he has to torture her brother. Michelle, about us..."

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 05:22 (twenty years ago)

Well, Audrey's ex did own the building where her dad's assassination was plotted. Which of course means nothing because Jack shocked him with an electrical cord for a good 10-15 seconds and decided it meant nothing. And Jack's ALWAYS RIGHT. Right?

Haven't seen this one tonight yet. I hope one of these BT sites works.

I will be disappointed but not surprised if all of the totally illegal over-the-top torture goes completely unpunished.

"Millions of people will die." It's justification for anything, it's like a bizarre inversion of the "Prime Directive" in Star Trek but with no discussion. In Star Trek I seem to recall the directive causing much soul-searching. None of that for Jack. Or Michelle. Or Tony, now that he's learned his lesson. Or even David "we've got to get our hands dirty" "Sherry Slight Return" Palmer.

I forgot about that thing about ex-Prez's getting called "President" in perpetuity, if people so choose. It's a bit Popish isn't it.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 05:30 (twenty years ago)

I like how Palmer is now kind of a shady backroom character manipulating everything along with Mike in defiance of the President who wants to do the right thing.

Also, Mia Kirshner was naked again.

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 06:09 (twenty years ago)

OMG Mia Kirshner is on the L Word? why has no-one informed me of this importnat fact????

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 06:10 (twenty years ago)

she's totally naked all the time, too.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 15:26 (twenty years ago)

Surely WILLIAM DEVANE must be revealed eventually as being the series 4 über-villain?

Maybe by Series 5 they'll have put a guard on CTU's back door, which might help to stop traitors running away, or at least make them form an orderly queue.

The very back door at which Jack (the bastard) prevented Ryan Chappelle from having a last cigarette, mind you - although Chappelle was indeed thinking of running away, albeit non-traitorously.

Harthill Services (Neil Willett), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 16:32 (twenty years ago)

Wow, DefSec got there FAST. Was he dozing off in the next room for the past 7 hours?

I don't mind the Tony hostage situation, but they really shouldn't telegraph things that obviously. The Marwan escape was pretty obvious too (Rule #2: when nameless CTU agents are escorting or responding to a call, they will fail and get killed...easily).

I like how Speaker Don Asheton's reaction to Logan siding with him. Kinda like how an eight-year-old boy would if his parents tell him he's right.

alex in montreal (alex in montreal), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)

Is it me, or should people have been freaking out a little more considering an ACTUAL NUCLEAR MISSILE was flying over the US? It was like, ho hum, missile blah, let's just discuss quitting our jobs for the trillionth time...

Plus, we were clearly robbed some cool shots of a missile flying through the skies and stuff.

I'm guessing next week that Michelle will get offed instead of Tony. (Therefore there's a new reason for someone to be mad at Jack. People always have to be mad at Jack.)

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)

I knew TEH GHEYES would turn out to be responsible! that or the chinese, or the liberal "amnesty" ppl. or them swarthy looking types. or, er, those who won't sanction torture at the drop of a hat. (bastards)

YAY! kill them all.

this was a total "set-up" ep for the final 2 hr excruciating finale that did (as chuck sez) ignore the whole "bloody hell, a nucular fcking missile heading somewhere kablooey madness" thing.

rule #3, couple finally declare intentions of getting together = 1 of them is SO for it.

ja (_ja_), Tuesday, 17 May 2005 23:43 (twenty years ago)

Yeah but why not ignore the missile when you know it's never going to hit its target?

The thing that bugged me about that episode was Richard Heller's interogation. Like all they kept asking him was 'YOU CALLED MARWAN LAST WEEK: WHAT DID YOU TELL HIM?', without even narrowing it down to what day it was, like he only makes one phone call a week. And couldn't anyone at CTU have even considered that it wasn't him who made the call? And couldn't they have got a recording of it from the cell phone company? And how did Chloe find the right cab company, let alone at the right driver in five minutes at 4:30AM?

And, what with their whole 'oh, we're trying to appeal to a right-wing audience now' thing, the closeted-son-fucks-a-man-and-jeopardises-all-of-America thing was just plain disturbing.

And they've had Marwan in custody for a whole hour, yet they've only had Jack ask him about two questions before deciding to bring Richard Heller in. Yeah, Marwan's supposed to be a 'lost cause' but considering every other suspect during this whole season has talked after Jack breaking their little fingers or sticking diodes to their nipples, you'd think they'd try a little bit more.

Michelle's little heading-holding look of despair right at the end made that episode. She hasn't done shit all season but that three-second shot was as near-as-perfect a moment as you're going to get.

And I had no idea that Mandy would turn up again. That was good, she's still completely drop-dead evil. Fuck knows how she's supposed to walk Tony through yet another one of those completely-useless-in-every-episode CTU perimeters. I swear, if CTU has to set up a perimeter AGAIN just once more in the finale, I'm not going to watch a single episode of season five. They must have set up at least a dozen perimeters in the last 22 hours and not one of them has worked. Fuck, they even did that trick twice in this week's episode.

Seasons five and - they've confirmed this - six will just be more of the same, except more bland. More breaking of the 'real time' rule. More giantic plot holes. More rehashing of storylines and characters from past seasons, except in a slightly different order. More lame dialogue. More huge unit-shifting DVDs.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 02:01 (twenty years ago)

have they confirmed all this already??

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 02:35 (twenty years ago)

I meant that to read that a further two seasons, rather than just the next one, have been given the go-ahead, but I'm tired and I rambled on.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 02:48 (twenty years ago)

they need to bring on the Mad Max action by season six, i'm serious. let civilization go to hell

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 18 May 2005 03:51 (twenty years ago)

i can't be the only one to notice all the Cisco plugs, right? "oh, I'll pull that up on the IP PHONE" - cut to finger pushing button on big well-lit phone which quite legibly says "Cisco Systems" on them

which reminded me of a previous episode where it was like "DUNH DUNTA DUNNNNNN" the network is possibly compromised and chloe's like "no, don't worry, our network is SELF-DEFENDING" - a term literally straight from their promotional literature - cut to shot of computer screen with Cisco netw3rk s0phtware. no doubt many of the haX0r here would simply have snickered, had one of their co-workers pulled such a line on them.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 19 May 2005 01:33 (twenty years ago)

cisco is a sponser, immediately after that IP phone mention, there was an ad for the same phones.

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 19 May 2005 01:51 (twenty years ago)

I like how all the U.S.-hatin' terrorists drive Lexuses (Lexi?)

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 19 May 2005 02:06 (twenty years ago)

"i see a spike in this twitching PCP fiend's physical readouts!"

i have such a blind spot for plots, i think somehow related to my gullibility, that i get particularly pleased when i make predictions like:

"Who wants to bet that the SecDef's son does something supa-crazy to aid the terrorists as a result of his prolonged exposure to the CTU Rave Helmet?

-- Tracer Hand, February 15th, 2005."

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 19 May 2005 02:15 (twenty years ago)

(And yes, I am suggesting that after the first time he was tortured he went BACK in time, became GAY, and zoomed back into the present to take up his snivelling tweaky PCP addiction full time.)

There's a beautiful, almost imperceptible snicker by Jack when Audrey says to SecDefSonBro "there's a MAN here who TORTURES people, i've seen him do it! So you gotta tell us everything, for your own sake!" and Jack's look says: you don't know the half of it, lady.

Tony has been phoning it in for so long I've forgotten his real name again. Something.. Bernard? Still he's the only obvious tab for CTU agent most likely to get tied up by a super-hott terrorist babe with only the finale left to go.

I was SOO ready for Audrey to be all like "and no cameras for my five minutes with my brother" and then proceed to slip young duder a gun and both of them come out shooting.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 19 May 2005 02:41 (twenty years ago)

Is Castle dead?? Isn't he sort of like the Al Neri of "24"? always there, like a reassuring security blanket?

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 19 May 2005 02:43 (twenty years ago)

Man, and now IBM joins in with a hardware ad doing a Dilbert-esque parody of 24 (I still think a sketch where McDonald's employees act as if they were in "24" would be better).

Anyway - cracking!

Finally the COMEUPPANCE moment is coming into view, wherein CTU feels the pain that its "break the rules" attitude towards torture will inflict if anybody has license to use it - like the Chinese

Fantastic as well that the lead they're chasing, the ONE tree that Jack is barking up ("have faith!" - Palmer), etc just becomes a smoking dead end

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 23 May 2005 23:37 (twenty years ago)

ARMAGEDDON IT

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 23 May 2005 23:38 (twenty years ago)

Aaaah Jack has a MAGIC video playback machine and cellphone-call enhancement software! It really takes the Blade Runner 3-D image enhancer one step further, it can bring the dead back to life!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 23 May 2005 23:43 (twenty years ago)

HAHA YES

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 23 May 2005 23:57 (twenty years ago)

although, who in his right mind would bet on Jack Bauer getting his comeuppance, ever

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 23 May 2005 23:58 (twenty years ago)

That was nice of Marwan to open the cargo hatch so that his pilot could put the bags in

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 00:05 (twenty years ago)

phew! that was close!

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 00:21 (twenty years ago)

For all my multifaceted hatred of Jack, he's the only agent with any urgency about the nuclear missile headed towards L.A.! "edgar, wake up!!" I guess it's been a long day. maybe Jack's been dipping into the old pill chest, he's awfully shouty for what time of day it is

Aaaaghh no! Tony and Michelle, spare me!! If there's another 38 minutes of this..

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 00:27 (twenty years ago)

"There should be more people like you!" (like Jack) ?????? Uh no there shouldn't.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 00:30 (twenty years ago)

haha the white house is one step ahead of you tracer

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 00:32 (twenty years ago)

me and President Logan are likethis

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 00:33 (twenty years ago)

OMG dude peeking around a corner

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 00:33 (twenty years ago)

oooooh snap! "you heard me"!

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 00:39 (twenty years ago)

24-themed diarrhea ads!!!! ("make peace with your body" the tagline!! amazing)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 00:46 (twenty years ago)

I LOVE YOU CHLOE!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 00:50 (twenty years ago)

shades of the incredible hulk

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 00:56 (twenty years ago)

the teaser for 24 season 6 (jeez) had a little "subliminal" number 24, in like helvetica, that filled the screen for 1/30 of a second

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 01:01 (twenty years ago)

to be clear, "i love you chloe" was in response to tony deciding, after they've been grieving over jack's body, shot dead by the govt. escort hitman in order to protect the US from the consequences of having the wealth of security information that exists in jack's head get tortured out of him by the Chinese govt, who Jack is supposed to turn himself into (as a result of a previous tree Jack barked up which, if i'm not mistaken, yielded exactly 0 information which turned out to make the difference?) - season over, Jack dead, and Tony finally goes "er give me the epinephrine" and chloe goes "I don't know Tony, he looks really dead!"

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 01:05 (twenty years ago)

what i meant about needing fewer people like Jack was really that the goal ought to be literally never needing anyone like Jack. i mean, if the govt. had a picture of the woman who tried to assassinate the former President for like four years or whatever it's been, and still hasn't managed to get ahold of her? dude she's been make casual, drop-in friends with people who live in her L.A. apartment complex. they look like young Hollywood hopefuls, maybe her cover is that she's an out of work actress.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 01:10 (twenty years ago)

white people can get away with anything dude

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 01:15 (twenty years ago)

All said, a really great set up for season 5.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 01:19 (twenty years ago)

what're the odds that season 5 takes place 'years' after season 4 and all this trouble with jack has been resolved offstage and he's back at ctu and thank god cuz we need more people like jack?

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 01:21 (twenty years ago)

I'm glad that for about 20 minutes, it finally RAINED during 24.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 01:37 (twenty years ago)

maybe he'll get a job with the mexican ctu!

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 01:45 (twenty years ago)

"She has a GIFT....forged in PAIN!"

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 04:45 (twenty years ago)

excellent way to end the season. Let's not forget, Mia Kirshner is still out there for future use!

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 04:47 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, after all of that was done, I said, wait, naked Mandy is still on the loose! Also, Now Kim Bauer has no parents. (Not that I like her, but...)It's going to to be pretty harsh when her dad shows up alive in a year. SURPRISE!

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 12:56 (twenty years ago)

Teaser for season 6, huh? I missed that.

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)

I meant 5.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)

What 'appened in it?

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 19:45 (twenty years ago)

nothing.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 24 May 2005 20:27 (twenty years ago)

I'm still pissed off that when the Chinese asked if the US government was involved in the snatch, they didn't say .. "You know .. it was probably this guy Marwan who did it. He knows we're after that guy as an informant. It only makes sense." That whole Chinese plot pissed me off.

Also, intercepting a nuclear missile at the last minute and it doesn't even go kaBLAM = dud.

diedre mousedropping and a quarter (Dave225), Wednesday, 25 May 2005 11:07 (twenty years ago)

yeah there were some disappointing things in this: the missle destruciton was totally anticlimactic and unbelivable ("oh there it is, yeah we can shoot it out of the sky with no problem; there, all taken care of") and I don't buy for a second that the chinese dudes were able to find that agent in the time frame they did.
I predict we won't have jack bauer until the last half or maybe even the last quarter of next season.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 25 May 2005 20:43 (twenty years ago)

also, mia kershner is so hot I want to die

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 25 May 2005 20:44 (twenty years ago)

like Jennifer Connelly's even hotter, dirtier younger sister.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 25 May 2005 20:54 (twenty years ago)

She makes a good Nina.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 25 May 2005 22:27 (twenty years ago)

I have to say, I there weren't nearly as many "WTF" moments this season as I remember from the others. The show's signature used to be yanking the rug out from under your expectations. It's turned into much more of a procedural slog.

And I'm surprised how bored I got by Tony Almeida.

Edgar and Chloe were magnificent, though, probably the best supporting characters the show's ever had.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 26 May 2005 19:16 (twenty years ago)

It's funny, when you think about who could feasibly carry his or her OWN show, on the strength of their acting/character alone, it's not Tony. It's not Michelle, nor Curtis, nor Audrey. Just possibly Buchanan, but probably not. It's Edgar and Chloe. It's extremely easy to imagine a show that turns around Edgar. Ditto Chloe.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 26 May 2005 19:18 (twenty years ago)

So who's back next year? I think we've closed the book on Tony and Michelle, most likely. David Palmer, probably done. I reckon Chloe, Edgar, Buchanan, and Curtis are the ones who will return.

one thing:

BEHROOZ, WHERE DID YOU VANISH TO? Curtis seemed to forget his "promise" to him pretty quickly.

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 26 May 2005 20:16 (twenty years ago)

JACK CLOWNS BUBBLEGUM


(i can never find this thread ever...so i'm typing this so i can find it easily in the search...ignore it)

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Thursday, 26 May 2005 20:33 (twenty years ago)

The Chinese embassy subplot did indeed suck. It was the golden opportunity to at least acknowledge the central moral question of this season: is torturing people the way to go? Is it smart? Does it work? Does it cause more problems than it solves? And crucially, if we do it to them, they will do it to us. 24 just sidestepped it. I was waiting for some kind of comeuppance, some kind of acknowledgement, and I thought having the CTU agent in Chinese hands, interrogation lights shining hotly upon his head, would provoke something akin to Palmer's admonishment at the end of season whatever it was when his VP betrayed him, and he warned everyone about rushing to war based on shaky intelligence. But nothing. Porno analyst: tasered in neck, then fired, both for NO reason AT ALL!? and no one pays a price?

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 26 May 2005 21:00 (twenty years ago)

I'm glad to see I am not the only one to think she was porny

they should bring her back!

I liked this season a lot, on the whole; it was the best since the first one, certainly. The second half of it seems very very removed from the first half; I guess this is usually how it goes.

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 26 May 2005 21:30 (twenty years ago)

Now I've Seen It All Dept: The Naked Mandy-Adbusters-Team Up

Phoebe Gloeckner describes recent research for an upcoming project in an update to her website: "November 2003: Phoebe spent two weeks in Mexico researching a story for a big book that will benefit Amnesty International. Cartoonist and journalist Joe Sacco is also involved and traveled to Russia to research his story. The professionals at AdBusters Magazine are designing the book, which is the brainchild of activist Mia Kirshner

Chuck_Tatum (Chuck_Tatum), Monday, 30 May 2005 19:30 (twenty years ago)

three months pass...
americans: a&e is doing a marathon of this right now, they're on the second episode.

teeny (teeny), Sunday, 4 September 2005 22:21 (twenty years ago)

I want a piece of paper signed by the preznit, too.

David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 6 September 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)

three weeks pass...
Abc is showing Season 1: Ep. 1 of 24 right now (Sunday @ Midnight.) I don't know if this will be a regular syndication thing.

Grr, still 4 months until the 4 hour season 5 premiere.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Monday, 3 October 2005 03:39 (twenty years ago)

So, series 4, was it any good?

chap who would dare to kill all the threads (chap), Monday, 3 October 2005 13:08 (twenty years ago)

Worst of the four, by far, I think.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 3 October 2005 13:10 (twenty years ago)

yes thoroughly agree with you alba, i thought it was going to pick up at about the 9m-10pm mark but it all just fell apart again soon after.

Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 3 October 2005 13:16 (twenty years ago)

I was away for it, but series 3 didn't do much for me anyway.

chap who would dare to kill all the threads (chap), Monday, 3 October 2005 13:22 (twenty years ago)

Repetitive, ridiculous use of torture as a plot device was my main complaint, I think.

Generally, the tone went a bit too fascist for my liking, too.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 3 October 2005 13:24 (twenty years ago)

I liked 4 a lot, though it was the one that suffered fromt he worst "aha, this is our real plan" nonsense. It had a decent bad guy which helped (season 3's was just a bit too mad genius) and Jack's personal rumblings were okay. It should have ended with him in prison in China though, a "Rescue Jack" season 5 could have been great.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 3 October 2005 13:30 (twenty years ago)

the tone went a bit too fascist

but isnt that like saying there was too much drinking in the last season of deadwood? (i agree about the torturing, that was way over the top, but i ll take half a dozen torture scenes over kim bauer in puma peril any day)

one eye white, one eye black (FE7), Monday, 3 October 2005 13:35 (twenty years ago)

chloe saved it a little, but they even over did her for a lot of it.

o god the torture plots were ridiculous weren't they?

Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 3 October 2005 13:37 (twenty years ago)

I think series 1-3 wrestled with moral issues of leadership and even torture whereas with season 4 it was like "tough Jack against all the wet liberals letting the terrorists win" was the only dynamic.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 3 October 2005 13:42 (twenty years ago)

i like how if it's one of Jacks family members in trub he uses "let me break all the rules of the CTU and risk everything to save my family, it's what HAS to be done"
whereas if it's somebody elses family he uses "we have to let them die otherwise the country will suffer, it's what HAS to be done"

Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 3 October 2005 13:48 (twenty years ago)

I'm starting to go back to my original idea that this show would have been better if after the first year, they kept the premise of 24 hours in real time, but changed the characters and their occupations to something new. Like 24 hours on the job with astronauts, or ... night-anglers.

when something smacks of something (dave225.3), Monday, 3 October 2005 14:07 (twenty years ago)

Or they could ditch the realtime conceit and just do a show about Jack Bauer and CTU. I mean, how many cases can he have that last exactly 24 hours?

chap who would dare to kill all the threads (chap), Monday, 3 October 2005 14:16 (twenty years ago)

Season 3 was by far the worst. The stakes were mroe interesting in 4, and torture aside, the storytelling was better. As uninteresting as Audrey is, Claudia was far less of an empathy factor.

And why are you limeys coming onto this thread for?

Leeeeeeeee (Leee), Monday, 3 October 2005 21:11 (twenty years ago)

No it wasn't! Oh we've attempted to melt down every nuclear reactor in the country as a cover for, er, one wee bomb. Surely it would have been more devastating just to have melted all the reactors?

Also the Tony/Michelle romance was shit x 1000, and the ludicrous convolution of storylines to get all the old characters that weren't Kim/dead back in again was laughable.

I read a while back on imdb.com about a new character of Ryan Chapelle Jr in season 5, but that seems to have been one of their "jokes". Though in 24-land, anything is possible.

ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 3 October 2005 21:25 (twenty years ago)

This is fantastic.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Monday, 3 October 2005 21:34 (twenty years ago)

three weeks pass...
First trailer for Season 5!

http://www.24la.net/videos/teaser1season5.wmv

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Thursday, 27 October 2005 01:33 (twenty years ago)

I was going to post that. There's some screenshots from it too.

It almost looks like it might be good.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Thursday, 27 October 2005 12:27 (twenty years ago)

impossible to tell really

Ste (Fuzzy), Thursday, 27 October 2005 12:31 (twenty years ago)

Anyone notice "Prison Break" now has the same type of monologue intro as Season 1 of 24 had? Fox clearly know who their target audience is.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Thursday, 27 October 2005 21:34 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
Someone in 24 spoilerland posted the 10 minute season 5 prequel which is going to be on the Season 4 DVD (out tomorrow.)

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 02:50 (twenty years ago)

cheers!

I liked how Jack's TOYOTA completely outperformed the bad guy's BMW.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 15:02 (twenty years ago)

Jack's toyota runs on the ground-up bones of suspected terrorists.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 16:00 (twenty years ago)

The mullet is fantastic.

I predict that this will be the dumbest season of '24' yet. Not quite as low as 'JAG', but at least it'll be fun.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Saturday, 10 December 2005 01:22 (twenty years ago)

Weird, I think this could actually be the first season that is not a diminishing return of the previous one.

(although Season 4, the weakest season yet, was the season that made me a fan)

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Saturday, 10 December 2005 04:46 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
Ok, less than a week to go now. And we're getting treated to a double episode on Sunday and a double episode on Monday! FOUR HOURS.

This is going to be great.

Craig Gilchrist (Craig Gilchrist), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 12:54 (nineteen years ago)

I wouldn't let him write an article for the TV column again!

Craig Gilchrist (Craig Gilchrist), Tuesday, 10 January 2006 13:41 (nineteen years ago)

teh funny:
http://www.wereallgladhere.com/24.html

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 05:58 (nineteen years ago)

http://img377.imageshack.us/img377/6528/jack9bi.jpg

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 11 January 2006 15:10 (nineteen years ago)

Quick, someone make a new thread tonight for the new season.

James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Sunday, 15 January 2006 19:39 (nineteen years ago)

seven months pass...
Some day 6 spoilers:

http://www.aint-it-cool-news.com/display.cgi?id=24160

Personally I find this a bit disappointing - I was hoping it would be about Jack escaping from the Chinese as a bit of a change of tack, instead it seems that it will be terror threat in LA, business as usual, ho-hum. I'm sure I will lap it up regardless.

chap who would dare to start Raaatpackin (chap), Wednesday, 16 August 2006 15:13 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.