Love George
― George Lucas, Thursday, 23 September 2004 11:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ewen MacGregor, Thursday, 23 September 2004 11:41 (twenty-one years ago)
No.
George
― George Lucas, Thursday, 23 September 2004 11:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alec Guinness (afarrell), Thursday, 23 September 2004 11:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 23 September 2004 11:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― lukey (Lukey G), Thursday, 23 September 2004 11:58 (twenty-one years ago)
My mum and dad say that I'm shit in the role and people laugh at me on the street. When you re-release Episode 2 can you digitally replace me with Chewbacca?
Cheers
Hayden
― Hayden Christensen, Thursday, 23 September 2004 12:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 23 September 2004 16:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 23 September 2004 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)
sorry, that's as fervent as i can get.
― stevie (stevie), Thursday, 23 September 2004 16:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― teh pow! (blueski), Thursday, 23 September 2004 16:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 23 September 2004 16:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― why do old people and old users of ILX such bastardos (deangulberry), Thursday, 23 September 2004 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.albany.net/~genxtv/lids1.gif
"How's THAT for a topper?"
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 23 September 2004 16:37 (twenty-one years ago)
I don't piss, I don't shit, I'm gettin' no relief,People shake their heads in disbelief.GO!
Just me on a hilltop with 15 girls,In a Nelson Reilly orgy that'll make your hair curl.I don't piss, I don't shit, I'm gettin' no relief,People shake their heads in disbelief.
Yeah, Charles Nelson Reilly, he's our man,He can't heal the sick with the touch of his hand,He can't walk on water, can't make wine flow;Just another greedy actor on the late late show!
― All Hail the Dead Milkmen (Ned), Thursday, 23 September 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 23 September 2004 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevie (stevie), Thursday, 23 September 2004 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Thursday, 23 September 2004 16:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Wooden (Wooden), Thursday, 23 September 2004 16:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Perry '08 (Dan Perry), Thursday, 23 September 2004 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Wooden (Wooden), Thursday, 23 September 2004 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― teh pow! (blueski), Thursday, 23 September 2004 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)
obi wan vs. vadervader vs. his ladyfriendvader kills all of the jedirise of the empire
and when you consider how f'n stupid and flimsy the other two prequels were, it gives me little hope that the 3rd one will wrap everything up nicely and segway into a new hope as much as the fanz would like it to.
― still bevens (bscrubbins), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Loose Translation: Sexy Dancer (sexyDancer), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:21 (twenty-one years ago)
The main gripes I have about the prequals are:
* The technology! - It's too advanced, it should have looked more basic! It's like every went to pot when the Empire took over, maybe it did, but I woulda thought the Imperial war machine would have advanced. * The clones! - I always thought that the Storm Troopers were conscripts, and made the destruction of the Death Star an even bigger tragedy. Now it doesn't seem to matter so much.
― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)
Little kid goes bad. Will work on this after I've done the good bits.
― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Woe, Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:44 (twenty-one years ago)
I read part of this sentence wrong the first time. I happily blame Dan Perry.
― Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huk-L, Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:45 (twenty-one years ago)
"So, my lady, I must ask, those titties, where are they at?"
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 23 September 2004 17:49 (twenty-one years ago)
TEASER TRAILER SOON MMKAY?
― teh pow! (blueski), Thursday, 23 September 2004 18:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 23 September 2004 18:09 (twenty-one years ago)
(actually I kinda did like them, though i last saw the first one when i was 13. It works pretty well as mindless spectacle, and Ep 2 is one of the most exquisitely funny movies I've ever seen. Unintentionally albeit, but really.)
― \(^o^)/ (Adrian Langston), Thursday, 23 September 2004 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 23 September 2004 19:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 23 September 2004 19:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― n/a (Nick A.), Thursday, 23 September 2004 19:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― \(^o^)/ (Adrian Langston), Thursday, 23 September 2004 19:07 (twenty-one years ago)
Also, when our heroes have to fight all those monsters in the arena.Lucas still knows how to set up a good Monster vs. helpless human fight.
The second one begins so terribly (also the middle), but then the end was awesome so I left thinking "decent."
― TX, Thursday, 23 September 2004 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Hurting, Friday, 24 September 2004 02:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Layna Andersen (Layna Andersen), Friday, 24 September 2004 04:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lt. Kingfish Del Pickles (Kingfish), Friday, 24 September 2004 04:58 (twenty-one years ago)
Really, though, the only redeeming thing about the two prequels cinematically is the VERY end of the second, where you see the Emperor look over his huge army of stormtroopers and sorta-star destroyers, with the classic john williams score. Rest of the movies are hard to defend...
― Richard K (Richard K), Friday, 24 September 2004 05:57 (twenty-one years ago)
Please stop chasing me up hills you fat bastard.
― Five Dollar Note (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 24 September 2004 05:59 (twenty-one years ago)
I must go now for my scheduled dose of psychoactive drugs.
― THX1138, Friday, 24 September 2004 06:46 (twenty-one years ago)
plus, the Obi Wan/Jango fight in the 2nd wins 2nd Best. The yoda thing was pure fan service.
― Lt. Kingfish Del Pickles (Kingfish), Friday, 24 September 2004 07:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sexual Air Supply (Autumn Almanac), Friday, 24 September 2004 07:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 24 September 2004 08:03 (twenty-one years ago)
I did forget to mention that Liam Neeson's Sanjuro impersonation dulls a lot of the pain in the first one.
It's becoming clearer to me that one of the best things about EP IV-VI was Harrison Ford, who could actually make this shit sing. There's a story I read recently about Mark Hamill asking "I've just got out of the trash compactor, why is my hair still so good?" and Harrison says "This ain't that kind of film, kid". The tragedy is that the Episodes I&II have Ewan McGregor, this generation's Harrison Ford, and wasted him entirely.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 24 September 2004 08:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― stevie (stevie), Friday, 24 September 2004 09:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― teh pow! (blueski), Friday, 24 September 2004 09:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― robster (robster), Friday, 24 September 2004 09:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― teh pow! (blueski), Friday, 24 September 2004 09:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Friday, 24 September 2004 09:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 24 September 2004 10:45 (twenty-one years ago)
i do find George lucas hard to fathom though. I get the impression that he hates all of humanity and Star wars too, and I still have no idea why he's making these movies. Part of me is glad he is though, just because it's upsetting so many people!
― \(^o^)/ (Adrian Langston), Friday, 24 September 2004 11:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― teh pow! (blueski), Friday, 24 September 2004 11:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― \(^o^)/ (Adrian Langston), Friday, 24 September 2004 11:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Friday, 24 September 2004 11:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― robster (robster), Friday, 24 September 2004 11:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Friday, 24 September 2004 11:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― robster (robster), Friday, 24 September 2004 11:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Friday, 24 September 2004 11:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Friday, 24 September 2004 11:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Friday, 24 September 2004 11:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― teh pow! (blueski), Friday, 24 September 2004 11:36 (twenty-one years ago)
It would've made more sense to cater a bit more for the older star wars fans. what a dumb ass.
― Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 24 September 2004 11:42 (twenty-one years ago)
(totally otm too)
(does anyone else feel like a douchebag saying 'otm'? no homo)
― \(^o^)/ (Adrian Langston), Friday, 24 September 2004 11:43 (twenty-one years ago)
not sure this is necessarily true. from an artistic point of view possibly.
― teh pow! (blueski), Friday, 24 September 2004 11:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 24 September 2004 11:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― \(^o^)/ (Adrian Langston), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― teh pow! (blueski), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:10 (twenty-one years ago)
Rest of world:
2. Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, The (2003) $752,200,000 5. Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers, The (2002) $581,200,000 7. Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring, The (2001) $546,900,000 11. Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999) $491,314,983 25. Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones (2002) $337,600,00027. Star Wars (1977) $337,000,000
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:15 (twenty-one years ago)
The Phantom Menace made me sad that a generation would receive these sub-par movies as entertainment, when we got to enjoy much better movies.
― stevie (stevie), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:24 (twenty-one years ago)
ep 1 $924,488,301ep 2 $649,476,740ep 3 ????
lotr1 $871,368,364lotr2 $926,287,400lotr3 $1,118,887,224
xpost
― Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:24 (twenty-one years ago)
\(^o^)/ - Admiral Ackbar (the old naval sea dog with the body of a lobster) is the best SW character ever.
― Ben Mott (Ben Mott), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:27 (twenty-one years ago)
#1 Titanic#2 Ep 4#3 Shrek 2
― Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:29 (twenty-one years ago)
i think that's an illusion, faux-romanticism even. surely the whole ethos behind the special editions is because Lucas wasn't satisfied with the work done/technology available at the time, the decision to revamp being one made out of love and a desire to improve the craft. granted the CGI often looks shit (tho not in every case) but digital remastering is like cleaning and polishing your vinyl and buying amazing speakers years after the records came out so they sound even better, which to me denotes attention and acknowledgement of love and craft. the chance to make a big new pile of cash was a major bonus of course, but Lucas was rich enough already...
― teh pow! (blueski), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― teh pow! (blueski), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:34 (twenty-one years ago)
i don't doubt Lucas lovingly recrafted the movies, but he's no longer an artist at the top of his game, and has obscured the brilliance of his original work with the clumsiness of his new additions.
― stevie (stevie), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― \(^o^)/ (Adrian Langston), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:36 (twenty-one years ago)
Hahaha
― Ste (Fuzzy), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:38 (twenty-one years ago)
Isn't this exactly what all the old cranks said when Star Wars came out?
― \(^o^)/ (Adrian Langston), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:38 (twenty-one years ago)
he comes from a race called the mon calamari (i ain't making that up either)!
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:39 (twenty-one years ago)
Wasn't there one year (89?) when Harrison Ford had been in five of the top ten highest grossing films ever, and had just missed out on ET and Close Encounters?
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― \(^o^)/ (Adrian Langston), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ben Mott (Ben Mott), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― teh pow! (blueski), Friday, 24 September 2004 12:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Layna Andersen (Layna Andersen), Friday, 24 September 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Wooden (Wooden), Friday, 24 September 2004 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)
i respectfully disagree dude! they totally double-teamed him, that was so cheap!
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 24 September 2004 15:51 (twenty-one years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Friday, 24 September 2004 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)
Lord of the Rings, however, was their complete obsession, and they were even into the extended(!) versions and everything. LOTR is teh nu-star wars for kids, it seems.
Maybe kids don't want to be treated like idiots, Lucas.
― Richard K (Richard K), Friday, 24 September 2004 16:02 (twenty-one years ago)
Star Wars: Episode 1, Star Wars 2: Attack of The Clones
Harry Potter: every movie except the first one, which almost put me to sleep as well (can't even remember how many there are now or how many I slept through).
Lord of The Rings: Almost fell asleep during the first one, fell asleep during the second one, never bothered with the third one.
ALL OF THESE MOVIES SUCKED ASS!!
(For comparison, here are some similar-type actiony movies that did NOT put me to sleep: X-Men, X2 and Hellboy.)
― redfez, Friday, 24 September 2004 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)
Layna, YOU ARE TOTALLY SHITTING ME. U will be my sunshine FOREVER if you get some of that thing scanned. I... I HAVE HAMBURGERS. 4 U.
― \(^o^)/ (Adrian Langston), Friday, 24 September 2004 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)
I'm sorry - a friend made these DJs, they're lovely, and I honestly don't have the heart to put them into a context where they'd be mocked. Particularly considering I'm HIGHLY mockable on the whole subject matter.
Huh, I wonder if we know any of the same people...
― Layna Andersen (Layna Andersen), Friday, 24 September 2004 18:27 (twenty-one years ago)
I don't really travel in doujin or yaoi (haha blast from the past :( ) circles anymore, but anything's possible..!
― \(^o^)/ (Adrian Langston), Friday, 24 September 2004 18:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Layna Andersen (Layna Andersen), Friday, 24 September 2004 18:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 25 September 2004 02:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Saturday, 25 September 2004 02:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 25 September 2004 04:22 (twenty-one years ago)
Then we both looked around us. We were smack-dab in the middle of the theatre row, with utterly transfixed Star Wars geeks on either side. Climbing over these people was a task we did not want to undertake, so we suffered through more bad acting and nonsensical dialogue until the "Crouching Yoda, Hidden Jedi" sequence made it clear that Lucas should just completely CGI the next batch of movies and be done with it. Sigh.
― Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Saturday, 25 September 2004 05:32 (twenty-one years ago)
Why do I defend things like this? Why do I always get so riled up about people scorning these kind of films? I dunno, but there are plenty more legitimate targets than a space opera designed for kids.
― Michael Stuchbery (Mikey Bidness), Saturday, 25 September 2004 05:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Saturday, 25 September 2004 05:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Saturday, 25 September 2004 06:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― {Sand in the [vaseline} on the lens] (x Jeremy), Saturday, 25 September 2004 06:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Saturday, 25 September 2004 06:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― {Sand in the [vaseline} on the lens] (x Jeremy), Saturday, 25 September 2004 06:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew (enneff), Saturday, 25 September 2004 07:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Saturday, 25 September 2004 10:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 25 September 2004 10:38 (twenty-one years ago)
There was an almost naive freshness about it - it reminded me that there was a time before Star Wars-as-a-cultural-phenom - and it made me want to see the originals again.
― Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Saturday, 25 September 2004 13:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Saturday, 25 September 2004 13:32 (twenty-one years ago)
To watch Empire tonight and Return maybe as well.
also, what J.D said.
― Ste (Fuzzy), Saturday, 25 September 2004 14:30 (twenty-one years ago)
yes!!!!!!!
for all my disdain for these films i forget how incredibly fucking excited i was at one time at the prospect that they one day might be made
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 25 September 2004 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 25 September 2004 19:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Sunday, 26 September 2004 03:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Sunday, 26 September 2004 04:30 (twenty-one years ago)
OTM!
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 26 September 2004 10:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Sunday, 26 September 2004 11:27 (twenty-one years ago)
When it's gotta be said, it's gotta be said. That's all there is to it.
― Andrew (enneff), Sunday, 26 September 2004 11:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Sunday, 26 September 2004 11:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew (enneff), Sunday, 26 September 2004 11:30 (twenty-one years ago)
i have a model bust of him i got in the sainsburys on mile end road: on the box it said "jar jar binks sticky tongue figurine" so i had no option but to shell out - however the sticky tongue has since fallen into several gooey bits sadly and he is effectively tongueless
pashmina in the spirit of curious enquiry i am listening to "the best of colosseum" while i clean my kitchen floor - where wd you rank this experience?
― mark s (mark s), Sunday, 26 September 2004 11:31 (twenty-one years ago)
and the lord did look upon his 13th disciple. a fantastically irritiating creature whose prescence had driven a great many of his followers to despair. and he spake. get thee hence you titanically annoying fool i mean how the fukc is my dad's book supposed to teach people how to live their lives in any way with you stinking up its pages. and the lord did verily gain r00t access to the creature's sgi workstation. using t3h l33t h4x0r skillz that he did possess. and the creature did dissolve in a great cloud of stinking silicone smoke. and upon the screen of the sgi workstation did appear these words. tihz b0x0r = pwnz0r3d by teh n4z4r3n3 kru ph34r us. and great was the rejoicing across all of galilee.
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Sunday, 26 September 2004 11:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 6 August 2005 15:57 (twenty years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 6 August 2005 16:22 (twenty years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Saturday, 6 August 2005 17:01 (twenty years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Saturday, 6 August 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)
so I netflixed these because I'm on a space opera kick and really they are bogglingly awful, like memory-wiping traumatic awful. I saw 2 & 3 in the theater and don't remember them being as bad as they are.
note 1: all the dvd commentary - all of it - is either george lucas mumbling and sounding very deranged or some other guys talking about how they did all the special effects. That's it. There is no mention of the acting or storyline except Ben Burtt pointing out that the vast majority of the dialogue was redubbed bcz the sets would have wooden floors and that didn't sound right with people walking around and etc.
1a - to the extent there is mention of any narrative it comes in the form of lucas saying stuff like "uh uh wanted to mmm show the jedi being invincible, the uh droids don't stand a chance, uh um um this is an idea, that the droids are mm too slow, that a droid army isn't a very good er fighting force, that g...gets explored more later, um uh er especially um in the er second film"
note 2: I'm completely serious that lucas sounds like a dissociative madman of film on the commentary tracks. at one point very early on he says that he treated all of these like he was making silent films - the dialogue, sound effects and music were all just the score to accompany the pictures. Shortly thereafter he states that the line "I have a bad feeling about this" is the equivalent of a theme.
note 3: for all the ludicrous attention to detail that was paid in stringing together all these lovely set pieces you think there may have been one person on the payroll who could have pointed out that Anakin Christiansen is hauling nothing more or less than charcoal SAMSONITE LUGGAGE as he accompanies harvard's hottest jewess on their lakeside holiday.
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 05:54 (eighteen years ago)
the second one wasn't so bad. the third one might be better.
-- stevie (stevie), Thursday, September 23, 2004 4:29 PM (3 years ago) Bookmark Link
i agree
-- teh pow! (blueski), Thursday, September 23, 2004 4:30 PM (3 years ago) Bookmark Link
How bold.
-- Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, September 23, 2004 4:30 PM
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 7 October 2007 06:02 (eighteen years ago)
harvard's hottest jewess
^^^^^^^
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 7 October 2007 06:04 (eighteen years ago)
sundar's reference to "the old 70s star wars" is, in its way, one of the more unsettling things ever posted on ilx.
― J.D., Sunday, 7 October 2007 06:17 (eighteen years ago)
i still kinda like the third one. it's not "good" though.
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 07:03 (eighteen years ago)
and to be honest, some of the action scenes and effects in these are fun.
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 07:05 (eighteen years ago)
each one is extraordinarily insipid in its own way. the second and third ones aren't even fit to wear the disclaimer of children's movies.
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 07:16 (eighteen years ago)
you should probably feel ashamed as a filmmaker and a storyteller when a video game of your movies where everything is made of LEGO and all plot points are performed in pantomime by toys is regarded as infinity times better than the source material you spent twenty years and hundreds of millions of dollars making
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 07:23 (eighteen years ago)
hahaha true
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 07:46 (eighteen years ago)
some of the action scenes and effects in these are fun.
totally
the second and third ones aren't even fit to wear the disclaimer of children's movies.
you think these are MORE insipid than the first one?
Anakin lying by the lava with only one limb left is maybe the darkest shit i've seen in a movie rated under 15 - maybe something in LOTR compares. the whole set up to that scene is pretty ill-conceived tho.
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 12:58 (eighteen years ago)
to be fair there is no film out there that wouldn't be bettered by a cute, jokey Lego-based video game version
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 12:59 (eighteen years ago)
Apocalypse Now would be a hoot.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 7 October 2007 13:59 (eighteen years ago)
the White Stripes should try this trick.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 7 October 2007 14:00 (eighteen years ago)
Legodfather
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 14:23 (eighteen years ago)
Legonds of the Fall
― accentmonkey, Sunday, 7 October 2007 14:32 (eighteen years ago)
Legoodfellas too just for the "construction" lol
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 14:32 (eighteen years ago)
Lego My Dinner with Andre possibly not a winner.
― Noodle Vague, Sunday, 7 October 2007 14:38 (eighteen years ago)
I got it -- Blue by Derek Jarman.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 7 October 2007 15:00 (eighteen years ago)
LEGO JETÉE THE VIDEO GAME
God I wish I had photoshop and some legos and a camera
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 16:18 (eighteen years ago)
these are all complete shit and totally indefensible, some of the worst movies ever made. the actions scenes aren't so much fun as expensive; there's lots of shit going on but so poorly directed.
― s1ocki, Sunday, 7 October 2007 17:00 (eighteen years ago)
all the star wars movies are crap, the prequels slightly less so due to better production design
― ☪, Sunday, 7 October 2007 17:07 (eighteen years ago)
well I guess that counts as a defense
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 17:30 (eighteen years ago)
It's kind of amazing in hindsight that Orlando Bloom isn't in these
― da croupier, Sunday, 7 October 2007 17:35 (eighteen years ago)
His absence isn't really a defense because Hayden Christiansen is arguably worse.
2 and a half years on from Revenge Of The Sith, studios do not seem interested in generating alternative space operas or epics preferring to focus on fantasy epics set on Earth (bankable super heroes, POTC, Beowulf).
you would think that commercial success of the prequels would not deter studios from wanting to set up something similar if not actually better. you would also think that the dissatisfaction and distaste from many people who grew up with the originals would compel them to try and write new stories, some for kids (Star Wars-like), some for adults (Dune-like) and some for both (POTC-like). the demand for and popularity of sci-fi fantasy is still huge, maybe more than ever, so why is this not happening?
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 17:41 (eighteen years ago)
Because they're all too busy watching Battlestar Galactica torrents.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 7 October 2007 17:42 (eighteen years ago)
a nu-BSG-esque movie but with actual monsters/aliens would be awesome
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 17:44 (eighteen years ago)
-- ☪, Sunday, October 7, 2007 6:07 PM (39 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
agree with the first bit.
blueski, the prequels weren't genuinely successful in their own right, it was a franchise roll-over.
that said i thing james cameron's next film is a space fantasy thing.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 7 October 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)
i guess studios dont really think star wars set any sort of precedent as the massive fanbase and anticipation practically guaranteed they'd make tons and tons of cash. and they're probably right. their success doesn't really prove anything.
― s1ocki, Sunday, 7 October 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)
(xp)
less high school movies, more space movies.
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 17:52 (eighteen years ago)
more high school in space movies!! like starship troopers!!
― s1ocki, Sunday, 7 October 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)
Showgirls crossed with Blade Runner!
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 7 October 2007 17:56 (eighteen years ago)
less Paul Anderson space movies, more Paul Thomas Anderson and Wes Anderson space movies
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 17:58 (eighteen years ago)
no, please
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 17:59 (eighteen years ago)
more anderson cooper space news broadcasts.
― s1ocki, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:00 (eighteen years ago)
less pamela anderson myspace accounts.
starship troopers lost money. dune lost money. star wars is notable as being like the only movie ever to profit at the box office while being not set predominantly on earth.
space opera type stuff is still a giant risk for the studios; lucas OTOH was basically taking no risk at all with the prequels as pointed out above. I mean people sat there and watched nine hours of CG manure dribbling out of the projector because it was a cultural event.
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:05 (eighteen years ago)
I would watch a wes anderson sci-fi film if he could find a delaurentiis crazy enough to give him the money
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:09 (eighteen years ago)
I mean clearly owen wilson is suicidal because he's almost 40 and he's never been on the set of a galactic frigate
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:11 (eighteen years ago)
Brody could just wear that shiny suit of his and pretend he's a 22nd-century sports agent.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:11 (eighteen years ago)
too bad "daddy issues in space" has been done already
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:12 (eighteen years ago)
jesus you even put George Clooney out in space and you just bleed cash all over the place
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:14 (eighteen years ago)
space is the place if you've got about thirty million dollars that you hate
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:15 (eighteen years ago)
i bet 'sunshine' made money. didn't cost much.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:19 (eighteen years ago)
what we need is a space movie that will revive interest in the genre so they can finally make Pluto Nash 2
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)
http://history.sandiego.edu/GEN/recording/images2/PDRM1996b.jpg
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:22 (eighteen years ago)
that movie is probably worse than all the prequels combined
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)
i think it's more that nobody has made an actually good space movie rather than that original sci-fi fantasies will always lose money. i like to think so anyway, fuck this ridiculous civilisation otherwise.
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)
i think it's more that nobody has made an actually good space movie
in the last 20 years, i mean
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:24 (eighteen years ago)
im trying hard to think of any (recent-ish) non-earth movies that were hits. tom has a good point. star trek movies maybe? and even those were piggyback franchise movies.
― s1ocki, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:25 (eighteen years ago)
troopers is good blueski.
sunshine didn't cover costs either:
Budget £26,000,000 (estimated) $50,000,000 (estimated)
Gross $3,654,586 (USA) (23 September 2007) (sub-total) $27,782,393 (Non-USA) (16 July 2007) (sub-total)
thumbs down
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:26 (eighteen years ago)
sci-fi is just so much better suited to the small screen, businesswise, ask joss whedon or bbc wales
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:27 (eighteen years ago)
in summary, sci-fi fans tend to not like leaving the house
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:29 (eighteen years ago)
dvd sales cover the expenses of most big cgi-fests, but the studios don't wan't to let the auditors to know that
― gershy, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:30 (eighteen years ago)
i spell like an alien
― gershy, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:31 (eighteen years ago)
I like it too but there can be better surely, plus I'm thinking more of the sort of film that could excite and inspire under 12s (i suppose a film like ST would do this nowadays ha) but still keep adults interested.
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:31 (eighteen years ago)
THERE'S your OTM.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:32 (eighteen years ago)
I'm thinking more of the sort of film that could excite and inspire under 12s (i suppose a film like ST would do this nowadays ha) but still keep adults interested
Who needs that when they have Halo 3?
(I'm not kidding, really.)
Alien was a hit SF movie not set on Earth at all
but
'Sir' Ridley sex SF movies as dead as the western
― Ward Fowler, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)
fuck i am so bad at this
go here
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/film/article2351086.ece
― Ward Fowler, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:35 (eighteen years ago)
the point re video games is good, but they still don't compare visually and you can still do more story-wise in film
Pixar will make a space film but it won't do as well as their previous hits because the formula is tired - but everyone will blame it on the setting.
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:36 (eighteen years ago)
The flashy effects of recent block-busters, such as The Matrix, Independence Day and The War of the Worlds, may sell tickets, but Sir Ridley believes that none can beat Stanley Kubrick’s 1968 sci-fi epic 2001: A Space Odyssey.
lol a knight was high
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:37 (eighteen years ago)
I'm still up for a Darkstar 're-imagining' with better looks and more jokes
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:38 (eighteen years ago)
too bad Ridley's only worthwhile films were sci-fi!
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:39 (eighteen years ago)
other good space movie: GALAXY QUEST
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)
and there again the matrix, id4 and WotW are all on earth with distinctly next-week futurism
sci-fi just needs to get better at speculating cool ideas instead of imitating life as we know it already. I would suggest mining some other Hugo winners for source material instead of pot-virgin epistemological PK Dickwaving but nobody listens to me.
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:43 (eighteen years ago)
Please tell me this was not a misquote.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:43 (eighteen years ago)
what IS reality?
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:44 (eighteen years ago)
http://thecia.com.au/reviews/w/images/wing-commander-poster-0.jpg
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:45 (eighteen years ago)
sci-fi just needs to get better at speculating cool ideas instead of imitating life as we know it already.
True but cloning still freaks people out. Then again now that we're almost there it's further proof that the future is fact boring, with the same assholes as ever.
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:45 (eighteen years ago)
lol in the real version of star wars palpatine already has a terrible track record, is under investigation for all sorts of junk, may have done drugs, was certainly an alcoholic at some point, and gets elected to replace terence stamp anyway
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:47 (eighteen years ago)
in space the villains don't make you feel as dumb
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:48 (eighteen years ago)
there needs to be a flick about a robot who gets elected governor of California
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:49 (eighteen years ago)
I would so totally watch a Bill Clinton biopic if Terence Stamp were cast.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:51 (eighteen years ago)
Serenity made a little bit of money - $40mn budget, $53mn worldwide box office + DVD sales
― milo z, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:52 (eighteen years ago)
and Sarah Douglas as Paula Jones.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:52 (eighteen years ago)
$63mn worldwide
serenity/whedon fans are CREPEY
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:52 (eighteen years ago)
my best friend is one of them hahaha
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:53 (eighteen years ago)
(j/k he's a good guy)
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:56 (eighteen years ago)
Are the people in the Star Wars movies humans?
― gershy, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:56 (eighteen years ago)
i think we have established they are actors, not humans
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 18:58 (eighteen years ago)
tuomas is an actor, that much we know
― gershy, Sunday, 7 October 2007 19:06 (eighteen years ago)
i like his war films better. esp if you count 'the duellists' as war film.
― ☪, Sunday, 7 October 2007 19:06 (eighteen years ago)
argh i forgot about g.i. jane, i thought that was the other scott
― ☪, Sunday, 7 October 2007 19:07 (eighteen years ago)
srsly I love the director's cut of KOH
― El Tomboto, Sunday, 7 October 2007 19:08 (eighteen years ago)
white squall is a war movie
― gershy, Sunday, 7 October 2007 19:08 (eighteen years ago)
-- El Tomboto, Sunday, October 7, 2007 7:08 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
i might actually want to see that. the theatrical version was all right i guess.
gladiator was total bullshit, though.
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 19:15 (eighteen years ago)
except for when Oliver Reed was on screen
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 19:16 (eighteen years ago)
Fifth Element good too (except for when Tricky was on screen) as partial space movie
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 19:20 (eighteen years ago)
5th element sucked dide
― s1ocki, Sunday, 7 October 2007 19:21 (eighteen years ago)
haha i mean dude.
couldn't decide between dick and dude?
― milo z, Sunday, 7 October 2007 19:25 (eighteen years ago)
i didn't know there was even a choice in that equation
― latebloomer, Sunday, 7 October 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)
S1ocki, you missed the love thread on that movie on here a couple of months back. Everyone kept saying "MULTIPASS."
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 7 October 2007 19:31 (eighteen years ago)
i wasn't sure about Fifth Element at first but found less wrong with it the second and third viewing. looking back at last ten years i just appreciate the ambitiousness and attempt to do something a little different in that genre.
00s fixation on remakes has to wind down for art's sake. big action space movies needn't be more expensive than Master And Commander, The Last Samurai and such big budget mediocrity now - space setting seems to equal less human interest to too many people tho.
― blueski, Sunday, 7 October 2007 19:35 (eighteen years ago)
master and commander is a great movie.
― s1ocki, Sunday, 7 October 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)
not that i wouldn't want to see a space master and commander. and i do wish they would make more big sci-fi movies for sure.
― s1ocki, Sunday, 7 October 2007 20:33 (eighteen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avatar_%28film%29
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 7 October 2007 20:48 (eighteen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clone_troopers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Wars_ranged_weapons
Desperate shit, man. These films are the pits.
― Pashmina, Monday, 8 October 2007 10:14 (eighteen years ago)
Fifth Element is a good film and good entertainment, but I was kinda disappointed with it, because I finally thought there'd be a movie that'd manage to capture some of the sense of wonder of Valérian and Laureline, what with it being directed by a French comic fan, and Mézières himself involved in the design work. (If you believe the rumours, Star Wars too was influenced by Valérian and Laureline.) But in the end it was more of a Bruce Willis action film in a sci-fi setting than a proper space opera, and Mézières's influence could only be seen in the fact that the different aliens looked cooler and more imaginative than in your standard sci-fi flicks.
― Tuomas, Monday, 8 October 2007 12:39 (eighteen years ago)
SF movies as dead as the western
see this would be good news because the western came back in 2007 as oscar bait
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)
I enjoy the Star Wars prequels why because they look intersting
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 20:21 (eighteen years ago)
i remember thinking, way back when the first prequel came out, that there actually was an interesting kernel of an idea at the heart of it. a 'comment on fascism vs democracy' even!
like: the galactic order is a mess, complicated and corrupt, with hundreds of different aliens, and the republican government is divided and sluggish. the whole setup depends on a small crew of idealist and super-powerful archaic knights, respected by all, called upon more and more for their diplomatic abilities internally than actually doing any fighting.
and then one of these guys, the youngest and maybe most talented of them all, gets sick of all the gridlock and the inability of the civilian government to deal with galaxy-wide collapse. he falls in with and then leads a cadre of 'bad knights' (widely feared and shunned for being hostile to the liberal order) in a putsch, promising to clean things up and get the space-trains running on time. bonapartism in space, basically. and then years later his estranged revolutionary son comes along...
i mean, that sounds like a great movie to me. shame how it turned out.
― gff, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 20:53 (eighteen years ago)
yeah the politics of it could make for some pretty interesting high-concept shit and space opera could still have been an effective milieu. unfortunately lucas' need to revert to the mono-myth structure robs it of all depth, plus, nobody actually cares about darth vader, same as they never cared about luke. Ep III is the most tolerable of these because it's told largely from obi-wan's perspective, the only sympathetic (read: not a whining or incomprehensible moron) character in this mess.
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 21:02 (eighteen years ago)
"Episode I: The Crisis of Galactic Democracy" by George Lucas from a script by Carl Schmitt
― max, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 21:07 (eighteen years ago)
i would watch that shit
Mace Windu was ok too!
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 21:10 (eighteen years ago)
guys we're forgetting what matters here
http://www.tvguide.com/movies/dbpix/images/42897a.jpg
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)
every single frame of I-III is fucking horrible on some level
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a61/npope3001/ned.gif
― chaki, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)
that matters a lot but it does not last nearly long enough to excuse even having to FFWD through all the other nonsense in that one. jesus all that CGI pastoral romance bullshit made me want to eat my own brain
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)
But riding around on space hamsters, Tombot.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 21:15 (eighteen years ago)
i've only seen episode I
― gff, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 21:16 (eighteen years ago)
i still think the "nooooo!" in ep. 3 was one of the seven wonders of camp, and it had a couple of fleeting moments dipped in genuine star wars magic. casting that twerp as anakin in the first place tied their hands, I think it had the potential to be a just-below-average prequel(that is to say, an unqualified triumph compared to the first two) with some more gravitas from the lead.
― tremendoid, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 23:36 (eighteen years ago)
I think Ian McDiarmid's vivid camp is the only thing I'll remember from those movies; his Palpatine is the only thing that suggests the terror and ridiculousness of Lucas' space-opera conceit.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 23:40 (eighteen years ago)
i seem to remember an unveiling of his massive screaming EVIL-IZED head as he's fighting mace windu that had people rolling in the aisles at the screening. i mean, think about it, ep. 3 was the first time in 5+ hours of the saga where you could even begin to make your own fun. it's a crime is what it is.
― tremendoid, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 23:45 (eighteen years ago)
I dunno, you can kinda make some of your own fun with certain contents of the still hoos posted up there
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 00:30 (eighteen years ago)
</ slashdot mod-bait>
natalie portman bare midriff is not even 1/10 princess leia in metal bikini
― Hurting 2, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 03:41 (eighteen years ago)
So the digital editing was actually for Natalie Portman's boobs? Compare that pic to this:
http://images.askmen.com/galleries/actress/natalie-portman/pictures/natalie-portman-picture-6.jpg
Or is she wearing some hyperspace push-up bra there?
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 10:25 (eighteen years ago)
i'd give her a hyperspace push up bra
― ken c, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 11:22 (eighteen years ago)
sorry should have been a hyphen between up and bra.
― ken c, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 11:38 (eighteen years ago)
I don't get it, a "hyperspace push up-bra" ?
― Hurting 2, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 13:32 (eighteen years ago)
you know, hyperspace = faster-than-light = FTL = fruit-of-the-loom
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)
he was referring to the hyphen placement.
― s1ocki, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 15:36 (eighteen years ago)
Since when are breasts static, is what I want to know.
― HI DERE, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 15:38 (eighteen years ago)
I'm not saying they wax and wane with the cycles of the moon (although for some women they do) but it is not at all unbelievable or out of the ordinary for a woman's breasts to be a different sizes over the span of several years. It's not that hard! (yet) (sorry)
― HI DERE, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 15:40 (eighteen years ago)
Are the bosoms in Star Wars funbags?
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 15:40 (eighteen years ago)
also I just invented the word "tyra-riffic"
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 15:41 (eighteen years ago)
the robots are neat and make for great toys! for real, my son and I have a lot more fun playing star wars than watching it. The star wars legos just rule...my wife and I just put together the Jabba's sail barge and it's awesome.
― pj, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 15:57 (eighteen years ago)
you son of a bitch
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 15:57 (eighteen years ago)
just put together the Jabba's sail barge
want
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 16:05 (eighteen years ago)
see I just express my envy with expletives
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 16:06 (eighteen years ago)
I am so glad my child will not be subjected to this shit - by the time she's old enough Star Wars' will be sooooooo uncool
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 16:07 (eighteen years ago)
Dream on, dude.
― HI DERE, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 16:11 (eighteen years ago)
oh god, shakey mo daddier
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 16:11 (eighteen years ago)
guys if you all pooled together and bought me a star wars lego set for my birthday i wouldnt be mad cause it was a few days late
― max, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 16:15 (eighteen years ago)
The little lego Leia is, of course chained by the neck for Jabba's *ahem* enjoyment.
― pj, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 16:18 (eighteen years ago)
http://cache.lego.com/upload/contentTemplating/StarwarsProducts/otherfiles/1033/uploadC00F8D9A-301F-48F2-8F47-91778A32AF73.jpghttp://cache.lego.com/upload/contentTemplating/StarwarsProducts/otherfiles/1033/uploadC00F8D9A-301F-48F2-8F47-91778A32AF73.jpghttp://cache.lego.com/upload/contentTemplating/StarwarsProducts/otherfiles/1033/uploadC00F8D9A-301F-48F2-8F47-91778A32AF73.jpg
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 16:19 (eighteen years ago)
0_o
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 16:20 (eighteen years ago)
you really have to give it up for macgregor's hamtronics too though. I mean he says, out loud, "I saw a security hologram... of him... killing... younglings" and then makes like he just threw up a little bit in his mouth, with the urp-guard hand motion to the lips and everything. You know nobody was paying a damn bit of attention to the acting after they let him get away with that.
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 11 October 2007 02:58 (eighteen years ago)
lol younglings!
― s1ocki, Thursday, 11 October 2007 05:58 (eighteen years ago)
It was having to say younglings that made him throw up in mouth. Lucas is v smart.
― blueski, Thursday, 11 October 2007 10:27 (eighteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/sagRoVb.jpg
― AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 4 January 2017 03:07 (eight years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, October 10, 2007 12:07 PM
― HI DERE, Wednesday, October 10, 2007 12:11 PM
hehe, how does it get uncooler from here?
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 January 2017 03:49 (eight years ago)
You start liking it?
― The beaver is not the bad guy (El Tomboto), Wednesday, 4 January 2017 03:54 (eight years ago)
been there! '77-83
― Supercreditor (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 4 January 2017 03:57 (eight years ago)
daughter is still not interested in Star Wars for those keeping track
― Οὖτις, Wednesday, 4 January 2017 16:36 (eight years ago)