What is considered a "fat girl" these days? I really want to know.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I don't give a shit if this one again makes me look like scum, a la FOBs.

But I am asking this seriously this time. There is this girl on the internet I have been talking to, on and off, for 8 months. I have been making plans to meet her when I fly back home for christmas for a few months now. I didn't really plan on anything serious (the distance between LA and PA is quite a bit, 3,000 miles) but god knows; she's an interesting emo/nu-punk-admiring high school senior and as I've been talking to her for such a (relatively) long while, I'm up for anything..and I don't consider "mere" friendship lesser than anything anyway..

Regardless of my ultimate intentions (I mean do I have to justify answers I don't even know myself here? I haven't even met her!), she told me today she used to be "fat," meaning 220 pounds or whatever. The thing is though that she sent me a picture of herself from last year and even thogh it's been a while since I've seen it, I didn't think she looked particularly large in it. She refuses to tell me her present weight when I asked is it 170 she said "less" ..when I asked if its 150 she said she isn't saying.

I am somewhat confused now. I don't think she was deceiving me or anything, but she herself just said "I used to be a fat girl in freshman/sophomore year" and I didn't know that before. She still is scared of me thinking she's fat when I meet her, though. I still want to meet her. But I'm wondering..if any of you girls here, if you were 150 to 170 pounds, and 5 feet 8 inches, would you consider yourself "fat" ? Is that fat or normal? I am asking since I have no way to guage this; I don't know what the "normal" weight for a female who is 5'8" and 18 is "supposed " to be. I myself am abnormal: I am like 125 and 5'7". So, I was just wondering if anyone here could help me or give me an idea. I am feeling really awkward about the whole situation...

...not least because in due respect of irony, I posted way-too-fucking-long messages on a beauty thread here a few days (albeit a textbook one according to Tom!), trying to defend women, and I may be behaving like an awful "tereotypical "man" here even being concerned about such a question, but, geez, I' a have to uphold that scum/stupidnewbie reputation those other boards started, so I think I'm doing a good job. So there!

Vic, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

aargh answer !

Vic, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

by the way trhis reminds e of the movie Fat Girl that came out this year. I think it's euro-indie ? I haven't seen it but I heard it was really good,. anyone here seen it ?

Vic, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Anyone that Tom fancies...

Fat girl threads a re bluddy nightmare. Did we fight in the Kate Winslett wars for this?

Pete, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

jesus i knew this was a bad idea

Vic, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

there's no way to delete a topic eh

Vic, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

hey Ronan asks questions about girl problems too, I guess he doesn't need to be so defensive though since he just labels his threads "asshole" and such from the get-go. a strategy i might want to adopt in the future, if there is a future

Vic, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Conversion of pounds to stones anyone? I don't understand. Chances are she is perfectly attractive and wonderfully girl-shaped (ie she thinks she is fat, you think she is gorgeous), as lots of ladies are.

Ally C, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

oh don't start being an asshole, that doesn't help anyone! if i were you i would just stop asking her about it and wait till you meet her. then your curiosity will be satisfied and you can decide what you want to do from there. why, do you think that if she's fat she'll suddenly stop being interesting/fanciable or something?

katie, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Honestly Vic I couldn't tell you. I think the definition of "fat" varies from person to person obviously b/c it's such a loaded topic since self-image is so tied up with ideas of self-worth. for what it's worth I'm 5'4" and around 135 (I think, i never weigh myself) and have never been called nor think myself fat. I've got curves and am nicely proportioned.

If she mentioned her past weight to you it's obviously a sensitive point with her. Try not to obsess about it b/c she probably is. Whatever her shape is remember that it doesn't change the person you've gotten to know and like.

Samantha, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Conversion of pounds to stones anyone?

Oh for heaven's sake, it's not that complicated. 14 pounds in a stone. 220 pounds = 15st 10lb.

Nick, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Pete's answer is right. On both counts.

Samantha's answer is sensible. It's an issue w/her - don't push it one way or the other yet.

Tom, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Whatever her shape is remember that it doesn't change the person you've gotten to know and like.

Quite so. Size doesn't affect intelligence, humor, grace or how sexy a person is, to name just a few qualities. Don't worry and just go for it and see what happens.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Your question is so subjective Vic, I very much doubt it's possible to give you a straight answer. In any event, it matters not a jot what anyone of us thinks, the fact is you already like this girl and unless you're some kind of fule her weight isn't going to change that one iota. There's certainly no reason to feel awkward.

Trevor, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

subjectivity is the name of the game. i don't know if i've ever dated a girl who weighed less than 140, and none who were over 5'8". i never thought any of them were "fat" in the least, unless i started comparing them to fashionistas, but that's fucking bullshit anyway, as any fule knos. i myself weigh 120 lbs. more than you do vic, and i'm only 11 inches taller. am i fat? i think so; many people don't. i'm sure some do. do i care? no. (well, i *do* but thats another thread entirely.)

jess, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

An extremely loose guideline suggests allowing 100 lbs for 5'0" tall, and in women, another 5 lbs for each additional inch of height (men are spotted 10 lbs for each additional inch). Now, this system rightly is criticized because it doesn't allow for extremely large or small bones or much muscular development.

Without knowing any other factors, the woman as you describe her sounds like she's not significantly overweight from a medical perspective. (On my frame the numbers you cite would look like underweight.) However, she sounds like she's wrestling with cultural definitions of overweight, which, at an extreme, would seem to uphold 2 lbs. shy of organ failure as the model of beauty. I'm sorry to say that I have no idea how to talk people out of these concepts.

j.lu, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

if anything, j's post has proven that i'm NOT overweight BY SCIENCE. huzzah!

jess, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Another way of doing it is to take your weight in kilos and divide it by the square of yur hight in metres, as a rough guide they say the healthy range is between 20-25, 25-30 is overweight and 30+ is obese, very rough guide though.

Ed, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"An extremely loose guideline suggests allowing 100 lbs for 5'0" tall, and in women, another 5 lbs for each additional inch of height (men are spotted 10 lbs for each additional inch)."

Blimey. Am I pigging out tonight!

Trevor, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

damnit...and according to ed's i'm overweight! fuggin metric system...

jess, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Why not just sleep with her, but avoid being seen in public displays of affection?

dave q, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I was waiting for someone to pick a line out of context from his initial question and call him a dickhead or something. Like "is this fat or normal". Do your worst you pc thugs.

Ronan, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

On reflection that posting probably wasnt my finest idea.

Ronan, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

the problem with questions like this one is that any answers that might exist are all tied up in personal issues and cultural (ab)norms not to mention less ephemeral things like bone structure. sure, pounds are a concrete mathematical measurement, but two women who are the same height and weight can look worlds different because of body shape, how they dress, etc.

i personally will say that if i weighed between 150-170 lbs i'd be pretty happy. (nb, i'm five foot four.) i do often struggle with my own perception of how i look on the fat/overweight but eh/ok scale, with the answers usually resting somewhere in between the first two.

questions like this are totally hard, in part because the midsection of the 'fat' slope is more often than not fairly slippery and in part because saying 'i'm fat' is probably the most generic catch-all expression of dissatisfaction with one's appearance. (i know that i hear it a lot more than 'i'm ugly' - do you?) also there's the whole idea of attractiveness being the sum of more than just physical bits, and the sliding scale of what turns people on ... and and and ...

maura, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

what's this, I have people here advocating my demise, calling on hordes to attack me on grounds of my perhaps-retarded inquiry, waiting to see my getting blasted by er, thugs? dude, i already inspired Mark C to start an entire thread out of anger at the first sentence of my 'shitty' question - see for yourself.

i appreciate all of your responses, even dave Q's (even though I can't do that since frankly, I can't just "fuck" one I might not be aroused by in the first place... enough performance anxiety here without that factor), but I liked Samantha's the best, since dolt that I am, only after reading that did it strike me that this really REALLY is a sensitive issue with her. D'oh ho ho, I don't care if she looks like Mrs. Santa Claus, I'm still going to meet her and be friends, if nothing more.

Vic, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

the first paragraph of that last post was for ronan, not maura.

Vic, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

actually that last post makes me sound like a snob. it's not like i already don't have friends of all different shapes. it's just that i never was talking to one online before with the prospect of dating them, and then found out about their size

Vic, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Vic that was not my intention at all. I was just surprised noone did attack you because threads like these have been very touchy in the past. I find nothing offensive in what you said and totally understand you being careful about it.

Ronan, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I weigh 800 pounds, and I am generally not considered fat these days. So, I think you have nothing to worry about with your girlfriend. Check that she is not an immigrant though - I believe that they sometimes lie about their weight, even up to the second or third face to face meeting.

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Don't be such a bitch.

Ronan, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I bet you wouldn't call me a bitch if I wasn't what-they-used-to-call- dangerously-obese

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

How much, I will if you will.

Ronan, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

no, i have a feeling he'd call you a bitch either way. one thing about our man fitzgerald is that he's consistent.

instead of bitches, could everyone reign in their 8 yr old side for a second. thanks.

jess, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Does Shaggy hate women?

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

And I didn't call you a bitch. I said you were acting like a bitch. If you've got a problem with someone you don't have to tell them in such a snide way. This is turning into veggie debate again.

Ronan, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

That's a koan I once heard

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I mean, 'does Shaggy hate women', not what Ronan said

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Wait a sec...'talking to people you're not aroused by'?

dave q, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Does Vic hate vegetables? Would he date one? Under what conditions?

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm taking my 8 year old side away with the other ten years of me before I say anything else.

Ronan, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i have been spammed six or seven times in the last few days by a cyberperson named linda gillie, or similar, promising me a fat- free future if [insert diet regime here: i can't cuz i didn't read it]. i assume she is related to funladynow as regards genuine human presence and intention; and is preying on loneliness and confused self- hatred, but is it arbitrary or does she only spam the (not unhealthily) over-weight?

i also got a very strange one from douglas hsu, which i cd not decode as to content, which also went to mjemmeson and mitch, i noticed, plus a buncha foaxs whose addys i dint know)

mark s, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

haw ha on the immigrant thing, if that was in reference to me and my FOBs

who is generally regarded as the most trouble-making, discord- creating ile poster around here anyway???

Vic, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

j-lu

mark s, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

THAT WAS A JOKE!!

mark s, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm no fashion model, but (and I don't mean to come off like a eugenicist) I agree with Mark S

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I do hate vegetables yet must eat them anyway; therefore I wish I'd be let off the hook when it comes to PHAT people, GEEEZ.

And it was talking to people I MIGHT not be aroused by.

sincerely,

an 8 yr old

Vic, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Vic, did you ever think that it might not be UNDER THEIR CONTROL? Not everybody is blessed by nature.

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm talking about Shaggy, btw

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

agreeing with mark s = coming off like a eugenicist?!¿¡

mark s, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry I meant Mark *C*

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

not j-lu, jel

mark s, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

You know, the one who wrote about the pubic hair problem

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think I should preface all of my postings on this thread with an ironic-content warning...

...but yes, I have considered that, I of course don't think it's someone's "fault," and honestly, I would rather date a healthy 160 pound/5'8" girl than an anorexic, anyday. But I am also sticking to that ideal of honesty when I truthfully confess that if I had a choice and I didn't know the girl's personality AT ALL, I would probably choose a slimmer girl over those stats, not least because i am such a toothpick myself and have had painful experiences with overweight women before. Yet in my situation, i already KNOW the girl's personality, so I'm not just going to be sgum (see the fob board) and drop her or anything...I'm going to take a chance and see what she's like *as a person* in person. I would never just hold her weight against her or use it to "blame" her, like you're implying.

Vic, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

no one can get a word in with him posting

mark s, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

oops, crossed post. It was MARK C who wrote about the pubic hair problem, not Jel.

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

not jel is who i meant by j-lu

don't think pubic problem, maryann, think PUBIC OPPORTUNITY

or was it jess? he's a blabmouth considering he has such a teenytiny head

mark s, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I wouldnt fuck Shaggy with a vegetable because he'd eventually end up using it to fulfill himself when I wasn't there and then write a hilarious song about me finding out.

Ronan, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Vic, I know you are being an honest person, and I respect you for that. I suppose I was being a little sarcastic, but believe when I say, I know it could never work out between us, anyway, as I am not into the same music.

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"it wasn't pea"

mark s, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ronan - same

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

To what extent is physical attraction important in a relationship. It's certainly significant yes?

Ronan, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

you headist.

jess, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

As I said to Vic. Mark S - the follow up single, to balance the damage caused to his vegetable audience, could be, 'Angel of the Corning'. This would also alert his hardcore listeners to the 'ballad-nature' of the song, which might be disturbing to them.

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ronan - physical attraction is very important in a relationship, I SHOULD KNOW.

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Any port in a storm

dave q, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

to what extent is musical-taste convergence important in a relationship? to what extent is a fantasy for fulfilling each other with vgetables?

huh, wait...maryann, how do you know about my musical tastes or fantasies anyway????

Vic, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(ps i am going to sign off now as i am on miedication — ovah-the-counter — for my mack-ache which [this has just clicked] caused comment at work today: "mark, you sitting behind your screen giggling and talking to yourself EVEN MORE THAN USUAL" was the gist of it)

the j-lu/jel thing = a gag spoiled by all these ppl having their serious argt; the jess thing = TRUE cuz i saw it in a dream

(which reminds i dreamt abt duane last night maryann: he wasn't there, but every dilemma that presented itself, i wondered solennly WHAT WOULD DUANE DO? I didn't start the Cuprofen Max Strength till this morning either)

carry on folks you've been a swell audience (except for YOU)

mark s, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

mack-ache = work it out

mark s, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I read that thing you wrote about British Spice-Girls fans' sun signs

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

That was in answer to how I knew about Vic's music tastes.

Mark S - 'What would Duane do'? That's pretty funny considering Duane's decision-making algorithm seems to always default to 'I'll just pretend to be reading this Cream magazine from 1973 and wait until everyone's gone away.' Of course that's what attracted me to him in the first place.

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Dave Q - any tart in a porn? any pork in a dorm?

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

fyi I don't like Rush, except their early stuff

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

to answer your question actually (because i am expecting that you will take to heart all the posts about not judging based on weight, hmm, sir!), 5'8" at 150 pounds is not medically overweight and 170 is very slightly. (this is on the bmi system i used google for.) so i'm assuming she's not grossly fat or anythng. not skinny and not fat. (and there is a BIG range between not skinny and not fat.)

As for this:

An extremely loose guideline suggests allowing 100 lbs for 5'0" tall, and in women, another 5 lbs for each additional inch of height (men are spotted 10 lbs for each additional inch). Now, this system rightly is criticized because it doesn't allow for extremely large or small bones or much muscular development.

I don't think this is very true. It doesn't fit me and I am certain I'm not fat or overweight or anything (I'm not giving my weight, etc. on ILE).

Maria, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Mark -- note that I too receive mail offering me an opportunity to "Lose 20 lbs. in One Month!," which, when translated to apply to my current weight, becomes "Wither and Die in One Month!"

Nitsuh, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I must admit that I think it pretty bad if a person goes for fat or thin. You know that if I loved a person I would take them as they are. As for myself, I am 5ft. I weigh about 160-165. Now there are others out there chubby because of thyroid control as I have I had mine removed and had a very hard time of it. I'm fine now. :) Anyway size shouldn't be an issue at all. If I wanted to meet someone do you think I'd care if he was chubby? I like hugable myself. :) :)

Gale Deslongchamps, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

At 5'4", 185 lbs, I am a fat girl by anyone's standards, but I get welcome attention from both sides of the fence. Taste is taste and can't be changed by good intentions, but you may find the lady in question to be adorable, and brainwashed to think herself fat by various media.

Layna, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I am thin and beautiful, but nobody likes me. I think of it as 'reverse love'.

maryann, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I call what I have "self-love." It's nice when it's around and very enticing when it's not.

Maria, Monday, 26 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

you have mentioned that she used to be 220 pounds, and now she is less than 170. thats quite a radical loss of weight, i hope she is healthy.

thats more than 25 kilos guys! how come nobody noticed!

di, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd be dead if I lost 25 kilos.

Ed, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i'd be dead too. yeah maria, it's not "groosly fat" or anything. thanks for your response. i loved your answer on that porno-damage thread so much btw, that i even bookmarked it

Vic, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Why do we always have the interesting conversations while I'm locked away in the studio?

Blah blah blah, fat is a feminist issue, etc. etc.

Yes, in an ideal world, people should be happy with their body image no matter what they weigh, the tyrany of the anorexic with the airbrush is harmful to everyone.

However, I always have to say this about my own weight. When I am happy with my life, my weight drops naturally (less comfort eating, more energy) and when I am miserable, my weight increases. So mood and weight and self image are all utterly inexorably tied together, and anyone who tries to tell you that it is or should be otherwise is foolish at best.

I am 5'8" and I'd just like to take this opportunity to point out that since getting out of an unhappy... situation, I have lost about a stone, just through not being miserable and not binging on chocolate every day. I'm still 165lbs, and therefore FAT, but I'm very pleased with the results. Everybody give me a big hand or I'll thwack you.

There are guidelines for how much healthy individuals of either sex should weigh if they are certain heights, and this is suppsed to be tempered for bone structure. (So there is a leeway of about 15 lbs on either side of "normal" before you're classed as medically overweight.)

I don't know what I'm blethering on about. But everybody clap for my discarded stone of useless flesh! (And there will be no quips about the 9 or 10 stone of useless flesh I discarded a few months ago, please!)

kate, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

^
|
|

Its true you know

clapclapclapclapclap etc.

Ed, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

kate is slimmy and u know it clap your hands - clappclappclapp kate is slimmy and u know it clap your hands - clappclappclapp kate is slimmy and u know it, she's lost flesh her body shows it kate is slimmy and u know it clap your hands - clappclappclapp

oh and i just love it when i mispell words i'm KWOTING

Vic, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh please.

Why are you bothered so much about her weight? The poor gurl must be freaking out about it if she's refusing to tell you. The internet must be one place where you can feel secure that body issues aren't a part of whatever relationship you're building - if you're that good friends she will come to talk about it to you in time. Or you know, perhaps she won't. I think you need to give her some respect and let her talk about in her own time.

Sarah, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

And for myself, my weight does NOT change with mood and "life situations". I'm happier now than I was in a screwed up relationship too, and now I'm in a good one which DOES make me happy but oh, do I see the pounds dropping off? It's NOT that simple a correlation. My relationship with food as "coping strategy" is far too ingrained for that and perhaps it's my problem. No scratch that, it's absolutely my problem which is why I guess I don't like it when anyone generalises weight issues as I can "generally" (sigh) say it means nothing to me. I'm not having a go by the way, just saying it doesn't always work like that. I should just fucking... I dunno. or something. Sigh.

Sarah, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think he just fancies her and is worried he may not be attracted to her physically which is important too. I don't think he ever ruled out the possibility of him being attracted to her if she was over-weight or whatever. I also think if he had posted it and said he was worried cos she said she had weird eyes, or a third nipple or something everyone would be a bit more lenient.

Ronan, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i wish i happy about my body but david says i look damn sxy.

anthony, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

despite the fact that they are physical features also.

Ronan, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Wierd eyes/third nipples being exactly the same kind of issue that weight/"fatness" issues are, right Ronan, I see your point. They're absolutely different. I didn't mean to be having a go there Vic, but I know I'm certainly very over-sensitive and can totally empathise with the girl in question in not wanting to tell anyone my exact weight - I won't to this day. I just got the howling fantods (or the shudders) thinking about it.

Sarah, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

There is no more subjective subject than this one nowadays, Vic! 24 hours in my life: -10 pm: i wear a miniskirt to work (extreme rarity). My boss, who is suspected to be anorexic by other members of staff, comments that I must actually be more slender than I look and trousers do not make justice. Translates as: your bum looks big in that. -3.30pm: Still wearing the miniskirt. I got a free latte in the deserted espresso bar because the waiters agreed I was the most attractive woman entering the place in the whole day. It was deserted, but there you are. -8.00 pm: Ed's test's result=20.07! Due to serious health issues, I have to actually control what I eat,drink ...etc. I could go blind if I did not,for instance. But I used to be much thinner when my metabolism worked properly and I could eat rubbish.

Laetitia, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think the central issue here is what intentions Vic has communicated to this girl. If he has been making it clear to her that he might be interested in a romantic relationship conditional on him fancying her, and then he meets her and doesn't fancy her, then he has done nothing wrong no matter what aesthetic judgements he's making. This would be the case if his judgement was based on her having a third eye, or being fat, or the colour of her hair. (Or maybe even skin but that's a question for another thread.)

If on the other hand he's been treating her as a friend and NOT mentioning his romantic intentions and may now drop her because he doesn't fancy her, well that is bad. But it's bad because it's dishonest and manipulative, not because he doesn't fancy her cause she's fat.

The basic point is that there is nothing wrong with not fancying somebody because they are fat. I wish more people did fancy fat women (and men!) because the sum of human happiness would be increased, but if somebody has that as their 'decider' then there's nothing you can do about it and - it seems to me - no moral position you can take on it, except to privately think that person a bit shallow. Some people have a very normative perception of attractiveness and then assume that everyone else will share it and criticise them for not doing so - those people are fuckwits. But Vic isn't among them. (That said Vic hasn't caught nearly as much flak on this thread as he seems to think he has).

I dread meeting people I know online and finding that I either don't like them in real life or that I *do* fancy them!

Tom, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

fat bottom girls, tey make this rocking world go around...what's the bet vic is a 350 kg house-bound woman who chaffs....i love you already.

geoff, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Fat girls usually jump into bed a lot quicker than their thin counterparts, anyway

dave q, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

hey i came here an hour and a half ago and just finished writing this really long pathological post justifyng my feelings toward phat girls. now i just realized that i didnt have to justify anything in the first place so its been cut should it be pasted?

i sort of had second thoughts about the whole thing being too personal and crazy to post, but do you guys want to read it ?

Vic, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

come on , tell me

Vic, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

vic - are you?

geoff, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

no geoff i am not. ok fine i'll just paste but i'm warning you this is going to be the most free-form incoherent ilx post ever and it's really er, self-indulgent? so you might just want to forget this thread...right about NOW

Vic, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

You've started so you might as well finish, as PAXMANG would say, post away.

Sarah, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

All of ILE is on tenterhooks hoping for most insane post in the world... ever!

Tom, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

really vic babydoll we all post obscenly self indulgent whckjob posts, dahlink its our calling, so come on honey and dip into the glue and past with gay abandon.

anthony, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

All of ILE is on tenterhooks hoping for most insane post in the world... ever! >/i>

I think you forget my diary entry of 31/3/91.

Nick, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

ok but its really uncensored and honest please don't hold anything against me if i offend you, i honestly do love fat people i am not prejudiced, i just, just have issues with suzy

and keep in mind that i started typing all this rubbish ater being awake for 35 hours and typing a term paper. i'm not really psychotic (anymore) ;-)

Vic, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

italics thing

Nick, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

oh please turn off that italic thing ! hehe i'm stallin

Vic, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh gosh. I should have expected this to keep going after I tried to go to sleep for a few hours (I have terribly insomnia tonight in particular!, so here I am back again - )..but no I certainly don't think I got as much flack as I could have, despite my flamboyant postings. I am really fortunate and grateful. I was seriously expecting like hate/hurt-feelings mail..

Um. I am glad Tom made that post, it seems to be clear what his point is in differentiating between two different types of people. I solemnly swear that I belong in the first group, because I have made it clear that we should see each other and see what happens. Mind you, she's been dating she said, I think more than 6 or 7 other guys in the past 8 months that I've on-again off-again been talking to her, so I wasn't like prohibiting her from seeing other people before I saw her. Really, i wasn't even sure if I was going to meet her until August, when she seemed to agree to it...before that she was on the fence, and we were just online friends who would flirt with each other. Ok yeah, so there were serious romantic undertones but I wasn't talking to her constantly this 8 month period. or ok can i e more honest? Wasn't it just hormonal undertones on my part ?To be honest, I saw her as this fickle high school girl (which she is), going through so many different guys in such a short time (regardless of how unserious I wanted the relationship to be. I mean, I met her in a chatroom in March where I half-seriously was trying to cyber pick someone up..very pathetic I know). I was all facile and ironic in my depravity: in like "hey, we met in a cyber room - now we should fuck!" and she would play along and it was funny, she would LOL a lot. Then over the montths as each and evey single one of her real life relationships didn't work out, somehow she got emotionally attached to me, in a way only girls can. I mean, she knows so little about me, she has never met me before or seen what I look like, but she was throwing the L-word around; that was, um, insane. I just chalked it up to being a 17 year old girl, and we didn't talk for a while since I've been emotionally...here and there...and maybe occupied or engaged elsewhere, not to another person but inside of myself..

and needed space.

I feel so dirty right now typing all this, I mean what if she walked in here, she'd die, it's her life drama for the world wide web to read. I wasn't even thinking any of this would be serious but then it got serious and then by August when I came back here I started feeling something for her too, but it was sort of minute? thing compared to her voracious need/drive to "have a boyfriend" - a longterm one i guess - since of course she felt/feels extremely lonely since "all her friends" had boyfriends but she didn't. I mean one thing she does know, that I told her on day one, was that I'm bisexual - isn't that a deterrent to girls anyway? (great thread topic, I guess) She lost her virginity to some 20 year old in august whom she knew was probably not going to see her again after he went back to college..she cried and laughed and went along with it, but it still hurt. He was one of these 6-7 guys. That need for partnership apparently...when I saw voracious, I mean voracious. Another thread topic: why does the mass media like Seventeen Magazine or Dawson's fucking Creek bbrainwash girls into thinking they need boyfriends or else their self-esteem is not complete...why do other women/girls determine a girl's worth based on whether or not she has a relationship, just like "macho" teenage guys deteremine a guy's worth based on whether he's fucked, or how much he has fucked? IS IT KATE WINSLETTE and that fdawful ship-movie's fault that all teenage girls in the past few years are made to feel inadequate if they don't have some idiot pretending to sing to them (while really he's just using her for pussy anyway, if we're playing averages) ? Oh jesus isound too cynical now.

anyway. back to the soap opera

Not only would it be immoral but I simply don't know how to post pictures up here, or else I guess I could post the pic she sent me in April and then in August. It's just a weird angle of her body in the former one, and her face in the latter; she looks so pretty in the second one. I never asked for these pictures - she just sent them to my email. In case you think it's unfair that i have her pic and she doesn't hae mine - well i never really demanded hers, and i don't have one scanned, and she just sent hers, and she never cared that i didnt send mine.

she didn't look even chubby in those pictures, needless to say, it might have been a "perfect angle" thing

then yesterday morning she says she used to be 220 pounds. after i tell her something like, " i don't care what you look like as long as you're not fat since i don't feel comfortable around fat girls." why?

Vic, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

WHY? because i was molested by a fat girl when i was 18 years old freshman year. i am never going to feel comfortable around them again at least for a while, sorry. i was new in that apt building and had followed new friends into her room, meeting her officially for the first time; well she seemed nice enough as i was talking to her, and then i noticed it was just me and her in the room since my friends said they were going down the hall. i weighed like 115? at the time; she was clearly at least over 260 or something, i dunno, but she took my keys away and just laughedand said i can't have them back unless i give her head, and locked her door and wouldn't let me to it. and since she was MASSIVE i couldn't just bulldoze my way through and um hell i was nervous yes, i mean this was so weird i was meeting her the very first time and was in her room the very first time when this happened. and anyway i was made to feel inadequate for the rest of the year that i "couldn't get it up " - SHE HAD ACTUALLY TOLD OTHER PEOPLE IN THE HALL THAT I HAVE A SMALL PENIS OR WHATEVER, etc. - well fuck you bitch i didn't WANt TO GET IT UP FOR you you fucking hippo!! i just somehow got out of there and somehow i did and i ran to my apt and kept brushing my teeth don't ask me why please it's not a memory i cherish

SO TO ALL YOU LURKING FEMINAZIS WHO MAY BE OUT THERE THINKING THAT ALL MEN ARE ONLY EVIL AND THAT WE ONLY OBJECTIFY WOMEN WELL FUCK YOU BECAUSE I HOPE ONE DAY YOU'LL ACKNOWLEDGE THAT WOMEN CAN DO THE EVIL DEEDS IN RETURN. AND NO ONE WILL EVER BELIEVE THE MALE SINCE WE'RE SUPPOSED TO BE INVULNERABLE, RIGHT? i mean, if i knew anywhere here in real life, i'd have castrated myself at this point in their eyes...and i'm not making it up. i'm not ashamed. fat girls like Dana are atrociously powerful i didnt just want to jump out the window

jesus, now my "rape" fantasy on that dark fantasy board will look like hypocritical shit, instead of just shite. but it's the truth - what can i do? and i'm not going to screw up my karmic account by lying, not even on he internet. i mean thats partially why i'm here - i don't know ay of you freaky indie british trigger people and i;ll never meet you in real ilife so i have started feeling comfortble now so nothin' but the awful truth baby i fee l like i'm in therapy though, maybe thisisn't theoutlet for all this. sorry if i am imposing, just skip this post. my self-consciousness has achieved new depths!!

back to Suzie., the funny thing is that um, i TOLD her the whole Dana thing when her 220# came up, i mean to protect my pride yeah i did tell it to her in a humouros way butshe kept LOLing but then said "hey wait a minute, *I* used to be 220 pounds." and then i ask her her weight and she's under 170...150? she's not telling. sudenly i'm the bad guy - no further comment on my true molestation story, i guess her fucking LOLs were all that would suffice - but um, suddenly I'm the bad guy because a girl's weight is important to me? and you never TOLD me that you used to be a fat girl before either? well fuck you, but no, since my moon is in Gemini and i'm emotionally detached from everything that's happening as it's happening, i don't express any frustration (thats coming out NOW 11 hours later!). She LOLs so I follow up with ... just abnother attempt to get humorous again and say something like "i'm sure you'll find another guy who's into big girls ha ha" and that did it, she told me she can't believe what i said, she cut and pasted it even though i thought it wasso evident hat i was being ironic and totally nonsensical with that statement, she told me to fuck off and well there she signed off. and then i posted my question on here .

yeah i talked to her briefly again and oh she's still mad and oh, if i don't like who she is then too bad and o h, i'm sorry suzie, "well of i'm not mad anymore but i realized if you don't like me for who i am..fuck you" ok ok ok. so i really probably shouldn't even meet this gorl, should i? i'm really questioning my motivations here, really. since yes, maybe i just wanted to basically hook up at first in march, i didn't know i'm going to be keep developing this friendship here, and well i always knew i had no game and probably would't meet the girl and get lucky, but i didn't know that she'd develop some sort of emotional thing for me. i want to fuck her because well this is only part of the reason, i really do like her as a person, geez, but yes, i'm a virgin with girls at 21 and it would be an ego thing since i am already considered culturally abnormal, just ask someone like Ronan who is around my age and would know it's the most shameful thing for a boy to be over 17 and still innocent. and it doesn't just have to do with cultural reasons ( remember how i'm an ethnic child? my brother remained virginal until 26 and a half, after his arranged fucking marriage he finally experienced physical love, and i bought the pre-marital = innocence ideal for a while, when i was young and idealistic and whoa, what the fuck, i never was. my mom still cant say the word sex inour house though she spells it s-e-x, ir's all sin, they don't know about me = queer part, but they kind of do, do think i'm odd. actyually thats a whole nother post, because ...) - i'm going to be honest again, it's cause of Dana. i have been really REALLY anxious since i wasn't able to "get it up" that night with her and never ask girls out and sort of use that incident to attack myself and tell myself that hey you're really gay not bi, don't lie "you're a half man, you're not virile" and whoopee i guess ******i am as guilty**** as suzy for buying into the media-engendered gendered-(haha)-myths as she is. but i kind of am so nervous about trying with a girl since what if that whole situation happens again..even though, um, i wasn't really TRYING that time since i didnt want anything to happoen, i was just trrying to get out of there, i was just too scared, and even though um, i can still masturbate about girls and get it up fine when i do that and eveything. so i guess it's not logical..but making love to yourself with the security of your own palm in your own house is diffeent han with another girl, and i'm scared of the Dana situation reoccuring, especially if the girl is somewhat chubby and then i'd never be attracted to her AT ALL. somewhat chubby...like suzy? this is why i'm too scared to ask girls out in real life and resorted to online thing with "nice girls" like suzy in the first place!! how did i know she was going to be "heavyset" and WHY DIDN'T SHE SAY SO 8 MONTHS AGO ? i warned you about this being the WORST ilx post ever - i am being totally honest and vulnerable here, this is so crazy, i haven't even thought about all this myself. you can tel i'm thinking as i'm typing... Suzy she knows i'm a virgin, she herself was one til august remember, hell i think she's even counter-objectified me cause she said once "i was talking to this nice/innnocnt boy last night ..like you..he was a VIRGIN...like you.." well geez, she knows i've been with guys, but if she knew HOW MANY (doing anything i'm not really into anal sorry) would she still think i'm innocnt ?

Vic, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

so it's a really omplicated question the whole thing. dont think though that 'coz my life is so pathetic i wrote that suicide post cause i didn't, i ve only posted on a few threds on herre, offending people on each one (fobs, etc). my conscience is like..well if you just want to fuck her to assert/prove your masculinity by losing your V, and not develop a relationship with her then you're evil but wait a minute, don't girls sometimes fuck just to fuk\ck too (why do guys have to be made to feel "guilty" here, or can't you see all my parental taboos coming into play)?? but it won't be Su. i only talked to her on the phone twice so far (she called the long-distance) and she already cried for 10 minutes during one of them when i told her i don't know if i want to like, marry her..

anf like i said i have been emotionally engaged.. well.. LIKE I SAID IN THAT "describe who you are" thread i am still emotionally recovering from this really traumatic mental breakdown i had a few years ago, and...and i feel very strongly towards this guy..and he precipiated parts of this breakdown...but it also has this spiritual dimension, i can't descfribe it since like i said in that thread, no one would believeme but that's he MOST INTERESTING and vital part about me and about anyhuman, my soul, i got so fucked up emotionally that "spiritual things" happened, thats the only way i can describe them, i can't say more. it's kind of hard to take all this when you're a teenager and still want to fit in (18/19 is still a teenager) and i know i have a bizzare life and a pretty dificult one, but i'm thankful for it since i'm paing off massive, MASSIVE karmic debts here. don't you have to destroy the mind in otrder to know God, didn't Nietzche experience the Kundalini too ? if i never learned to meditate i wuld never have broken down in the first place, and the experience came directly from God, so i can't blame myself... exactly how am i supposed to control those things anyway, i mean...it all started when I was 14. i really shouldn't have mentioned it.

i really shoouldn't have mentioned it. what harm can be done now?

this guy, i have feelings for him still and this girl...she hasn't even met me but sill has to demonstrate feelings of possessiveness. hey, you don't own me, i'm nt even the guy you FUCKED in august but i could have been but i waited.. i wanted it to mean something when i made love to you..i didn't knowyou were going to turn out to be FA. and lie to me for 8 months.

she's possessive. she knows i'm emotionallyextremely complex (all my 12th house planets, in air/water signs like i said) and she knows about this guy, she even knows the fact that i was told by so many different people that i have past live relaitionships with him stretching way back, but she had the audactity to say i should just desire her. hell she's never even met me before and him, i went to school with him and have known him since 1993 but she has to send me BLINK182 (does this answer why i hate the Tom?>) lyrics like "i want to make love to a toaster, I WANT TO BE YOUR ONLY ONE." well FUCK OFF CUNT YOU CAN'T BE MY ONLY ONE you could have at least been truthful to me i waited a very long time for yo, i reallly did want things to be special WHY DON'T YOU even want to understad my terribly insecriity with girls was instigated by a fat girl itself a FAT GIRL LIKE YOURSELF? i feel no remorse. i have to be ever-patient and apologetic why do you have to be an emotional vampire..

so i really shouldn't meet her then. cause i'm a bad man, an evil male, and don't want a relationship, just wantd a nice cyberchatroom lay, and she developed this relationship, and my self-loathing and dysfunctional past and astral imbalances and physical ungroundedness and performance insecuirities would get in the way anyway, but she wouldn't be attention, cause she's just a self-cenetered teenage girl who wants a boyfriend since all her friends have one. i don't want to be her boyfriend; she wont want to fuck me. i am not good at lying. i need a WHORE. she doesn't realize that she may need to do without relationships for a while and start focusing on building her own confidence, instead of deriving her self-esteem based on whether she has a boyfriend or not, besids i'm 125 and i f she really is 167 she'd crush me. that would bring back bad memories and id have to listen to limp bizkit i'm doing it all for thecookie stick it up YOUR YEAH SUZY, YOUR GODDAMNED YEAH. Gale, does this answer your question abou t my past with intimacy ? oh and please dont anyone tell me to get therapy for anything, since *obviously* ii've had to write western psychiatry as a rule off after well, when i was 17 i described a spiritual experience i had had in which i was disconnected from my body (huge internal painful orgasmic sensation) and they wanted to have me COMMITTED, right then and there. can't trust the bastards - my parents saved my ass... but really, they're all fakers. oh the counselor was a "yoga practitioner" too ..slmost fooled me jerfoff!!! ALMOST!!!!!!!!!!!! they just don't understand the inner workings of consciousness, astral realms, and then blame evreything on one catch-all under-the-rug word, "schizophrenia" which basically means: "disoders" about the mind we still don't understand. lock 'em up ! aand shock them! wqhat if youu're already getting electric shocks from da INSIDE!!?>

well well. i guess i learned what a blog is for after all. i really feel sorry for taking up so much space and for ayone who actually stated to read this. i feel extremely naked now, ge i wonder why. i wonder if i can even ever come back here again, not that i have any sense of embarassment left anyway. thanks for everyone who responded - you're al rerally nice guys... and so witty too. especially the british indie people

Vic, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Nick, you're still more insane. Sorry.

Nicole, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Damn it Nick why didnt you mention that before best-post-ever nominations closed.

Vic - wow, a lot of stuff here. Basically I think this girl probably isn't ready/able to understand the very intense and dramatic situations you're talking about - she's still discovering herself and her own attitude to relationships and working things out about her own body image, so having to process this idea that women can be aggressors and abusers and that this can warp somebody's notions about size issues is likely to be a bit difficult, especially as the situation exploded so soon after your mutual 'confessions'.

I don't think she was 'lying' to you incidentally - she didnt say she was fat but did she say she wasn't? If somebody starts chatting with me then unless the subject comes up I'm not going to say I'm overweight because it really doesn't define me - this is the luxury of the internet, to reduce the importance of those kind of things.

Tom, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

An extremely loose guideline suggests allowing 100 lbs for 5'0" tall, and in women, another 5 lbs for each additional inch of height (men are spotted 10 lbs for each additional inch). Now, this system rightly is criticized because it doesn't allow for extremely large or small bones or much muscular development.

I don't think this is very true. It doesn't fit me and I am certain I'm not fat or overweight or anything (I'm not giving my weight, etc. on ILE).

That's why I qualified it, saying that it's an extremely generous guideline and that it's criticized on these and other grounds. But of course the real problem is the loathing many women (particularly me) have for their bodies.

j.lu, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"Wierd eyes/third nipples being exactly the same kind of issue that weight/"fatness" issues are, right Ronan, I see your point. They're absolutely different."

You don't see my point at all, sorry. Or if you did you could at least take a minute to show me where I'm so wrong since direct contradiction without any evidence has never done much to change my mind, funny that. Why are some physical features that people can be insecure about any different to others? . I realise my use of weird eyes or third nipples as an example was glib, but the question still stands. Just because weight issues affect more people does not mean they are different to any other areas of their body people feel insecure about, or does it? What am I missing? Point still remains that if Vic had been saying the girl was really worried about some other aspect of her body, or something more obscure he wouldn't have had to be quite so careful would he? Nothing to do with importance as far as I can see, it's just because more people have fuckin history on this subject. Pretty obvious as soon as the poor guy started the thread someone was getting offended within an hour or two, regardless of what he said. You're doomed as soon as you start the fucking thread, no amount of caution is enough. God I don't mean to argue all the time or whatever, I don't think what I say is particularly stupid or outrageous but there you go. And if I sound confrontational it's not intentional.

Ronan, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Er Tom feel free to completely disassociate yourself from this comment but what I totally agree with what you said above and it's exactly what I was trying to say, yes I'm surprised too.

Tell me if what I'm saying is totally different or something but I don't see it, I'm going to presume negative reaction to my posting was due to my shoddy example "weird eyes, or a third nipple". Although that's not really what I think.

Ronan, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Well lot of stuff I did say a few hours ago was extremely stupid and outrageous Ronan, so don't worry about it - besides, I thought it was a fine example. I certainly agreed with it. Tom had the same viewpoint as you did anyway, he just used different vocabulary/syntax. Talking about weird eyes and third nipples is entertaining.

Talking about weird nipples and third eyes is even better

Vic, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh yeah and Tom, thanks for actually reading that shit, I appreciate it. =) Yeah I agree she wasn't really lying, but I'm sure you understood my repressed anger at her. I exploded like a bomb or something, and I kept trembling for like 20 minutes after I sent all that in. It's been an intense morning..

...but it's soon becoming a beautiful afternoon. A phat one

Vic, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ronan I suspect you and I agree on quite a lot of baseline politics and disagree in sweary fashion on how those politics get discussed/debated because diplomacywise you admire Bill Hicks and I admire M. de Talleyrand.

Tom, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Vic, sounds like you needed to spill that stuff. It's not psychotic, it's just... stuff. Has to be let out from time to time. Better here than while driving.

The chick who did nasty stuff to you in the dorm room and then made a joke of it is EVIL, as evil a boy who'd do that to a girl. DAMN, this pisses me off. If you heard that some guy did this to a girl friend of yours, what would be your opinion of him? Grrr. Psycho girl.

Your sexuality -- who you fancy -- that's how you are, nothing wrong with it. Plenty of girls like a guy who likes both. Plenty of guys like a guy who likes both.

Both the things above seem to be messing with you like the big time, and if they keep being a problem, you might wanna see a counselor to help you put them in their place.

The girl -- I dunno, if she's that possessive/must be YOUR GIRLFRIEND/needs a boyfriend because her friends have one, I'd go carefully. She sounds more YOUNG than anything else.

Best of luck.

Layna, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Hey Lanya, thanks very much ..yes she is young. I'm amazed you even got through that. thanks very much i appreciate you sharing your opinion whatsoever i amusually not like that. in fact, i think it's the first time i've REALLY said or typed EXACTLY what was in my mind, as the thoughts were taking place. Usually like most people a censor button is working..

Vic, Tuesday, 27 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

>>why do other women/girls determine a girl's worth based on whether or not she has a relationship

men do this to women as much as women do it too.

i'm really sorry about your experience with the "fat" girl, vic, but i would like to point out to you that it shouldn't matter to you what she looked like, the fact that it happened is bad enough. so calling her a "fat hippo" doesn't help to win you sympathy. i mean i do sympathise with you but... you know what i mean, the fact that she was fat is unimportant, and the fact that you emphasize it makes you look like a bigot. it sounds like you are projecting onto other fat women from your one experience with a woman who just happened to be fat. i suppose its more psychologically complex than i'm giving you credit for though?

are you sure you want a whore, and not a girl that you can respect and be friends with and fuck without things getting emotionally messy? i think there is a difference.

maybe you explained your self for the "whore" comment, but i only skim read through those big posts.

di, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Actually thinking about it Vic - and this doesn't change what I think above - your position now is more sympathetic (you were attacked and that is awful) but less ethically defensible (you are attributing moral qualities - propensity to fuck Vic up - to a physical property - fatness), Long winded way for saying "Don't hate all fat girls because of one of them", which you already know. But I'm just getting these issues straight myself.

Tom, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Hi Vic, Thanks for sharing what happened to you with us. You aren't a bad person and it wasn't your fault. What happened to you was awful but all chubby people aren't the same. I can relate very well to what you had to go through. I went through abuse as well sexual physical & emotional. The worst part for me in all of that was to watch my baby brother go through the same when he was 5-6 years old, and there wasn't a thing I could do to help him. So yes it is a terrible thing to go through. :( Gale

Gale Deslongchamps, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't like Bill Hicks *that* much. I am not perhaps the student disciple of Bill you may think.

Ronan, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Tom only said that so he cd call him "de" Talleyrand.

mark s, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Bof! Rumbled!

Tom, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

could someone summarise the findings of this thread. preferably in a neat table with a diagram.

Alan Trewartha, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

findings of this thread are (i think) that vic has had someproblems with a woman in the past who was abusive, this has fucked a few things up, some ppl were offended a little by the genrealisations, and geoff remembered some lyrics to old queen songs.

geoff, Wednesday, 28 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I understand that today everyone is into slim. but I go back a bit to when I almost lost my Mom to cancer. she weighed about 140 and went down to 100lbs. Does a thin person have a chance to pull through? My mom is still alive today having a little extra to fight with, & the best of doctors & God's help. I really think so anyway. Gale

Gale Deslongchamps, Thursday, 29 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

eight months pass...
BWAHAHAAHA........i'm printing this thread out and i'm gonna leave it on buses and dentist office waiting room tables

Ramosi, Tuesday, 30 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

ohmigod this thread is sill here??

V, Tuesday, 30 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i guess old things on ILx remain for forever then? how nice that one of my mental meltdowns is documented in real time in the archives here for the rest of time

V, Tuesday, 30 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

bro.....my bad if this dredges up something awkward.....I was googling for ethan's old fat chick thread and found this puppy......sorry, i didn't know......pretty ill though!

Ramosi, Tuesday, 30 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

no um, it's ok... i am pretty detached from all this enough now so i can just sort of smile at it...and er, it's from a "Vic," and I'm, ahem, V

V, Tuesday, 30 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

nine months pass...
umm.. what is normal weihgt for a girl who's 15 or 16?? am curious too... lol neways.. i dont consider girl overweight fat! U KNOW why? cuz they could burn it off.. hehehehe just takes 25 to 30 mins a day for 3 month.. to burn ur fat calories.. and dont eat to much fat!! cuz then whats the point... you get the fat again.lol!! Well my point is.. if you really care for your body, and wanna look good to others.. just do ur 10mins exercise at home everyday.. thatz all!

neko, Tuesday, 20 May 2003 04:23 (twenty-two years ago)

neko that is pretty great advice.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 04:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm sorry but if I see one more post with "u no" and other such SMSisms in it I am going to SCREAM. Why is it so hard to take the time to spell and type properly?

Sorry.. hread hijack I know... personal gripe of mine, don't mind me, carry on.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 05:13 (twenty-two years ago)

But fwiw I agree neko that is sensible advice. Lose weight? Sure! EAT LESS AND MOVE MORE. Its not hard.

God I'm grumpy today aren't I?

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 05:14 (twenty-two years ago)

if you really care for your body, and wanna look good to others..

I agree with the first part, but not with the second. Who says everyone likes slim girls?

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 08:02 (twenty-two years ago)

damn right

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 08:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I was reading something somewhere recently about a woman... OH, yes. It was Colette. She died weighing 180 pounds and this book I was skimming through was mentioning how that's horribly obese and she loved food too much and so on. And I'm thinking, Hey, I weighed 180 just a year and a half ago and sure I felt a wee bit unhealthy but I don't remember feeling obese. That's weird. I don't even know what I weigh now, but it's less than I used to - and I'm almost six foot so that makes 180 not so fat, right? And my mom weighs over 200 on and off and she's only 5'6" but I never felt like she was really fat.

Sarah McLUsky (coco), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 11:38 (twenty-two years ago)

It's all about body proportion; weight is a red herring.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 11:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Like if all the fat is in the breastesses then it's ok, right DAn? :)

Sarah McLusky (coco), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 12:17 (twenty-two years ago)

That was a question that answers itself.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I was gonna say!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 13:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I finally hit the 200 pound mark last month, damn it all. (I'm 5'4".) I'm glad that I'm going to be able to afford a health club now.

Christine "Green Leafy Dragon" Indigo (cindigo), Tuesday, 20 May 2003 23:34 (twenty-two years ago)

I hate to be an ass, but if you're
5"8 and over 140 you're probably fat.

masta ace (Squirrel_Police), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 02:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Unless you work out and have lots of muscles. Which
is very sexy, BTW, but I think most girls are scared
away from weights from seeing freakish female
cover models. It's a shame, too, since lifting
weights is such a healthier way to get slim than
starving yourself.

masta ace (Squirrel_Police), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 02:27 (twenty-two years ago)

okaayyy... so you go off about being "probably fat" but in the same sentence say its bad to starve oneself.

We can't win, can we? :)

PS: being a certain size and being a certain weight are not mutually inclusive.

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 02:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Like I said, it's hard to say, some girls are like 160
but and look fit and trim. probably fat isn't the worst
thing in the world, there's a saying of lads round
here that goes "more cushion for the pushin"

masta ace (Squirrel_Police), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 03:59 (twenty-two years ago)

er, i'm no fitness expert, but I don't think lifting weights helps you lose much weight, does it? (or were you referring to exercising in general?)

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 04:02 (twenty-two years ago)

lifting weights converts fat to muscle, which is not technically losing weight but it is "losing weight" ie becoming less "fat", according to the informal way we use language

jowburd (Squirrel_Police), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 04:06 (twenty-two years ago)

right, they'll wind up looking like a softball player

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 04:17 (twenty-two years ago)

140 lb = 66kg
5'8" = 1m73

Sounds fairly emmaiciated to me.

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 06:21 (twenty-two years ago)

that's not emaciated, but it's far from fat.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 06:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Good god, NO WAY, Ed. I mean christ that's slim, not emaciated. I am 1,66 meters and weigh about 58 kilos.

nathalie (nathalie), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 06:54 (twenty-two years ago)

How does one work out a square root? (I used to know this, but it has been consigned to the dustbin of my brain, along with the rest of my numerical ability.

Anna (Anna), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 12:28 (twenty-two years ago)

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 12:29 (twenty-two years ago)

doh!

try ?ã

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 12:30 (twenty-two years ago)

?ã?ã?ã?ã?ã?ã?ã?ã?ã?ã

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 12:30 (twenty-two years ago)

*cries*

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 12:31 (twenty-two years ago)

*also cries*

I still don't know what you mean! Speak in Spanish?

Anna (Anna), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 12:40 (twenty-two years ago)

i was being a smartass and it backfired on me

if there's a non-calculator way, i have no idea what it is

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 12:43 (twenty-two years ago)

there is no a non-calculator or tables way for doing square roots.

Why do you need the square root, anna?

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 12:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Um, I didn't even mean that. I meant how do you square something.

(I am such a maths dunce. It's very embarassing.
T: You can't be that bad. What are eight sevens?
[long pause]
[painfully long pause]
Anna (brightly) 58! )

Anna (Anna), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 12:51 (twenty-two years ago)

squaring is a number multiplied by itself

Ed (dali), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 12:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Fuck it. I found an on-line body mass index calculator and used that. Sorry for thread derailment.

Anna (Anna), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 12:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Fat and muscle are entirely different substances. One doesn't change into another. Muscle burns more calories than fat therefore in your resting state you have a higher metabolism. It's funny, I started working out last year 4-5 times a week. I weigh the exact same now than I did before but i redistributed my weight differently and got muscles in different places so trousers I could wear before I can no longer button and my shoulders are broader thereby giving my waist a narrower impression.

My weight fluctuates between 130 and 160, depending on my environment, and I'm 5'5". And the only difference I see when I'm at my peak weight is that I go up a size. I kind of always look the same. 160 is by no means fat. I kind of like it because I find it very soft and rounded and I still think I'm attractive and healthy.

Carey (Carey), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 13:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm 5'8 and go between 130 and 140 and I look about as emaciated as a pug. One that gets food on a regular basis. Just FYI.

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 13:06 (twenty-two years ago)

there is no a non-calculator or tables way for doing square roots.

yes there is! there are lots, in fact. kids used to have to learn them about 100 years ago.

my party trick when i was 11 or so was taking square roots of largish numbers to 1dp in my head. this probably explains why i didn't get asked to any parties.

toby (tsg20), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 15:22 (twenty-two years ago)

umm.. what is normal weihgt for a girl who's 15 or 16?? am curious too... lol neways.. i dont consider girl overweight fat! U KNOW why? cuz they could burn it off.. hehehehe just takes 25 to 30 mins a day for 3 month.. to burn ur fat calories.. and dont eat to much fat!! cuz then whats the point... you get the fat again.lol!! Well my point is.. if you really care for your body, and wanna look good to others.. just do ur 10mins exercise at home everyday.. thatz all!
-- neko

LOL!!1 i'M gald everything is so black and white to you, adn its sure great you showed me how its so simple lol! Clearly U understand that every1 who has a hard time losing weight can't because they don't have willpower and don't really care about their body.

You fucking retard lol! u r fat!

(The spelling and typing errors in this post are intentional.)

martin m. (mushrush), Wednesday, 21 May 2003 15:48 (twenty-two years ago)

my party trick when i was 11 or so was taking square roots of largish numbers to 1dp in my head. this probably explains why i didn't get asked to any parties.

-- toby

BUT YOU STILL DO THIS!

Anna (Anna), Thursday, 22 May 2003 12:17 (twenty-two years ago)

I am looking forward to the next FAP...

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 22 May 2003 16:49 (twenty-two years ago)

in fairness i do stuff like checking if phone numbers are divisible by small primes in a somewhat obsessive-compulsive way, but i don't tend to sit around taking square roots these days. i'm probably more than a little rusty.

toby (tsg20), Thursday, 22 May 2003 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)

lifting weights converts fat to muscle, which is not technically losing weight but it is "losing weight" ie becoming less "fat", according to the informal way we use language

Also, a larger muscle mass usually leads to a higher metabolism, which makes it easier to keep off or lose body fat.

j.lu (j.lu), Thursday, 22 May 2003 17:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Fat doesn't matter. You should really find out if she's into shrimping.

Mike Hanle y (mike), Friday, 23 May 2003 00:25 (twenty-two years ago)

seven months pass...
So...um....whatever happened here with Vic?

Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 6 January 2004 03:35 (twenty-one years ago)

'Why are fat girls always so frisky
But you can't go touching cos it's far too risky...'

- Debaser

the music mole (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 03:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Guys have it harder than women today anyway. If you're a fat girl you can still touch men up in clubs and no one will beat you up or tell you to fuck off. Guys will politely laugh or whatever.

Guys are under much more pressure to conform to an ideal of masculinity. It's bullshit that women think they have it worse and have to be some skinny blonde or something to get laid. Most girls I've known who think that get laid all the time and still moan. It's a sad sight. Just accept yourself.

C-Man (C-Man), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 03:39 (twenty-one years ago)

the sooner all of humanity just up and fucking dies, the better.

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 03:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Calum would stick his dick in a paper shredder if it had pubic hair around it.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 03:41 (twenty-one years ago)

seriously, i'm glad we now have our moderator-less paradise where c-man can fucking infest the boards and post psa's about how wonderful it is now that fat girls can chat someone up without getting beaten up. goodbye, ile. take it easy.

fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 03:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Dude, that was so not the point. The point was that it's double standards. You won't tell a girl to "fuck off" if she pats your ass but you sure as hell won't get off so easily if a guy does that to a girl. You know? Stop putting words in my mouth.

C-Man (C-Man), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 04:09 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd tell a girl to fuck off if she patted my arse (eg at work) and I know a few guys who would too.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Well I've had my ass patted in clubs by some mingers and I've been too nice to say what I really wanted y'know? But I'd not pat a girl's arse in a club. It seems one huge double standard.

C-Man (C-Man), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 04:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I've been too nice to say what I really wanted

Surely that's your fault, isn't it Calum? I have no qualms about telling people to fuck off when they're invading my personal space.

Jess, I think perhaps there's a handle you're flying off rather ridiculous. Chill the fuck out.

Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 04:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Ahh its Jess, he'll be back in a jiffy ;)

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 04:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Calum, you are a really sweet guy.

So why don't you stop playing the prick?

You've already cut down the retarded vicious insults by 75%, why don't you complete the process and quit starting silly threads?

eh?, Tuesday, 6 January 2004 04:30 (twenty-one years ago)

what?

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 04:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I almost hate to have to say this, but the day that Calum is patted on the head and Jess is somehow seen as being the disruptive evil one is a very wrong day indeed.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I dont think Andrew said Jess was disruptive, just that he flew off the handle a bit thats all. No idea wtf the other person's on about with C being "75%" less insulting tho - ha.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:09 (twenty-one years ago)

stupidist thread evah! even the "controversy"
is boring

Orbit (Orbit), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Ned, I think Jess' posts in this thread really are ridiculous, and in this particular instance (as much as I hate to say it) Calum looks far more reasonable and polite.

Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Trayce, I too would like to know the linear index on which someone is annoying. It would make my hatred that bit easier to quantify. ;)

Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:13 (twenty-one years ago)

no Andrew, don't sully my image of your seamless beauty *sob*

Orbit (Orbit), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, I was just being silly. I could never hate anyone.

Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:21 (twenty-one years ago)

in this particular instance (as much as I hate to say it) Calum looks far more reasonable and polite

Calum suddenly trying to come across all nice and reasonable in a desperate attempt to make him not look like the fool he is? You shock me, sir! ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey, at least he's trying.

Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:23 (twenty-one years ago)

And we can't exactly delete his posts where he actually attempts to be nice.

Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey, at least he's trying.

Uh, call me incredibly suspicious, doubtful and somewhat unconvinced.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh Ned, you're just incredibly suspicious, doubtful, and somewhat unconvinced!

Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:28 (twenty-one years ago)

And FAAAAAAAAAAAABULOUS

(I actually did still want more of an answer on this subject via the off-board message last week, though, so if you could respond to that...)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:31 (twenty-one years ago)

I think everyone on here can be an ass a lot of the time, so where the hell would I draw a line? =)

There should be ILX mud wrestling, there should.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 06:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Ned really should have met me in LA.

C-Man (C-Man), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 07:12 (twenty-one years ago)

This whole thread is fascinating.

The part of the thread up until the very present touches on a lot of things I've been thinking over and over in my head.

And then it turns into a "thread for updating purposes only" sort of thing. Which is kinda a bummer because I'd have really wanted to participate in the original thread, being that I have a million different thoughts that have historically troubled me, all swimming frantically in my head. Ah well. This is why the good Lord gave us journals, isn't it?

Tenacious Dee (Dee the Lurker), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 08:05 (twenty-one years ago)

The only way the thread will turn back into a dialogue over the original topic will be if somebody starts it, Dee.

Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 08:15 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/dga/dga95/weighcht.gif

Dan I. (Dan I.), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 09:46 (twenty-one years ago)

fools.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 09:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Ha, I saw that one about napoleon's march on Moscow earlier today again.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 09:49 (twenty-one years ago)

i could try and start it, if everyone wants. i think that the 100 lbs for 5 feet and 5 lbs for each additional foot is rubbish, to begin. and i will just go ahead and say that i am 5'5" and i weigh about 155 lbs. although i could shed a few pounds if i wanted, i have an athelitic build; ie, there is more muscle than fat, and i don't look hefty. if i lost weight, i would look more "hollywood attractive" but i really don't feel the need to do so. also, i am not lacking in dates or anything.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 09:51 (twenty-one years ago)

IF YOU WNAT TOO START IT THEN THEY NO THEY CANT FINISH IT PISTOLS WE ALL GOT IT ALWAYS THE GLOCK WE ARE GOOD BROTHERS OH IT NOT MY FAULT OH IT AINT MY FAULT THE HEADBUSTER AND IT IS A LINE OF CHALK WE TRUE SOLDIERS WE DONT DIE WE CANT STOP OH IT NOT MY FAULT IT NOT MY FAULT

Amazing Randy (Amazing Randy), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 09:53 (twenty-one years ago)

okay, so that you can see, here is a photo of me and my roommate, i am in the blue skirt.
http://i.myspace.com/47/25/15274/2565404_m.jpg

Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 09:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh my.

Is there a height/weight table for men somewhere? I don't imagine they're the same.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:00 (twenty-one years ago)

They're not. Actually, though, I don't know who the table I posted above is intended for. Maybe a sort of generalized one for both sexes. Usually when you'd see a chart like that for men and women, it would, naturally, allow for a woman at any given height to be heavier than a man at the same height.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:10 (twenty-one years ago)

no, i think that they usually assume that the men weigh more.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:12 (twenty-one years ago)

You're totally right, I caught that like the second after I posted it. I got all mixed up cause I was thinking like "oh but womens have the boobs though don't they!?"

Dan I. (Dan I.), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Dan I kiss you!

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Vic--what happened??

OCP (OCP), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:59 (twenty-one years ago)

mark, is all this kissing people your new year's resolution to get away from the barry thing?

(not that i have a problem with it. just curious)

colette (a2lette), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 11:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Is that graph above in reference to men, women, or both? If it applies to men then I'm just on the very edge of unheathily thin/healthy at ~150 pounds, 6'2".

Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 11:54 (twenty-one years ago)

what i love about that graph is that there isn't a SEVERELY UNDERWEIGHT section - er, if you're 6'6'' and weight 50lbs, you need to fucking pig out, dude.

Girls are luckier than boys in a way because they can get away with being SHORT - and being on a diet isn't gonna ever make you taller.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 6 January 2004 12:10 (twenty-one years ago)

on the outside, lucy lurex seemed like any normal 24 year old woman. smiling, drinkin', having a grand old time.

http://www.geocities.com/lucylurex/shuttup.txt

what no-one knew is that at 5'3" and 140 pounds, she is classed as moderately overweight and therefore not healthy. does lucy suffer in a private fat hell? or is this evidence that such height/weight charts are a crock of shit? i'm gonna sit back with a very large bowl of ice cream while you decide.

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:24 (twenty-one years ago)

and then maybe some chips and dip or a pizza with extra cheese.

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:28 (twenty-one years ago)

and several stubbies of monteiths

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:29 (twenty-one years ago)

NB: say the wrong thing and i'll squash you with my moderately overweight ass.

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Weekly World News had a thing a couple of weeks ago headlined "get slim and trim without losing weight!!" and it was about how standard classifications were "normal" body weight were out of whack. I love that paper.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Ms Lurex kicks the ass! And thus the world is again made right.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 00:42 (twenty-one years ago)

i just posted my weight on ilx HAVE I LEARNED NOTHING????

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Depends how big yer bum is really.

C-Man (C-Man), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:21 (twenty-one years ago)

consider yourself squashed, dummass.

The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Some girls look fine and dandy from the front and then they turn around and it's like, "Whoooa mumma", know what I mean?

C-Man (C-Man), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I think I do, but I doubt any of us have as much experience of the receding view of women's backs as you, Calum.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:33 (twenty-one years ago)

moted.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Ker-Tish!

(Cymbal noise)

C-Man (C-Man), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:42 (twenty-one years ago)

NEXT!!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 7 January 2004 01:46 (twenty-one years ago)

six months pass...
Oh revive this one. People moaning about their weight is always funny.

C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 16 July 2004 12:46 (twenty years ago)

Mandee

¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 13:31 (twenty years ago)

!!!!!!!!!!

Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Friday, 16 July 2004 13:34 (twenty years ago)

Seriously, could any man or woman here really, honestly, be happy dating a really fat person? An honest answer is required.

C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 16 July 2004 13:42 (twenty years ago)

C-Man, more cushin'for the pushin dude@#!!@#$

¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 13:43 (twenty years ago)

Seriously, could any c-man or c-woman here really, honestly, be dating a person? An honest answer is required.

ken c (ken c), Friday, 16 July 2004 13:46 (twenty years ago)

i would have no problem dating a fat dude so long as he isn't fat all in one place. if he's generally fat but kinda square shaped over all that's not a problem. but i draw the line at really skinny dudes with belly's that make up 30% of their body weight.

as for fat women i would of course love and respect her for who she was and never judge her on looks - only on her soul and her brain. (note: best thing about being a fag is being able to say stuff like that and never have to be put to the test)

anthony, Friday, 16 July 2004 13:51 (twenty years ago)

i would have no problem dating a fat dude so long as he isn't fat all in one place

what if all the fat is in THAT place???

ken c (ken c), Friday, 16 July 2004 13:53 (twenty years ago)

i am sad, that chart dan posted has me in the white area. it's, like, not labeled or anything. wtf - is that bad thing¿ am i unhealthy, then¿ i need closure dammit¡

dyson (dyson), Friday, 16 July 2004 13:57 (twenty years ago)

No meat on the bone? What kind of meal is that? Plus I don't wanna worry about breakin' em.

Plus, from what I've gathered, all girls think they're fat anyway. So in some sense, there are nothing but fat girls everywhere.

I am so proud that this is my first post in two weeks. So proud.

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 16 July 2004 13:57 (twenty years ago)

hmmmm. now u got me thinking too deeply about fat distribution. p'raps it's time for a chocolate and a quiet think about the implications of having a fat bf.

anthony, Friday, 16 July 2004 13:57 (twenty years ago)

It reminds me of something James used to say
"I like 'em fat, I like 'em proud."
You've got to have a mutha for me now move that big ass round this way so I can work on that zipper baby.
Tonight, you're a star...and I'm the big dipper.

(poster's note: and this dude is like 4' 11!)

PRINCE! (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:02 (twenty years ago)

Ha ha this is such nonsense. You fellas all want a long legged honey as much as the next guy. But if yer lying makes you happy go for it.

C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:09 (twenty years ago)

you can keep your bimbos, ah keep ma women like Flo-Jo

the neurotic awakening of sir mixalot (blueski), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:10 (twenty years ago)

So. I was wondering how long my honeymoon with nu-nu-ILX was going to last. Three hours and ten minutes. Anyone who doesn't think that there's some tangible difference in the atmosphere of ILX should read this thread from start to finish. It kind of makes me want to cry, but the most I can get worked up is a vague shrug.

Ma$onic Boom (kate), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:12 (twenty years ago)

Are you menstruating?

¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 14:13 (twenty years ago)

I rest my case.

Ma$onic Boom (kate), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:13 (twenty years ago)

JOKES!

¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 14:15 (twenty years ago)

Stevem, you really must keep that name.

The difference between old ILX and new ILX is that ain't no hater gonna hold me down, no, no I'm just gonna pop off and have my fun let the haters hate and the C-man see oh baby this is like a new millenium of love.

Sorry, listening to R. Kelly.

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:15 (twenty years ago)

http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/gurtov/photos/old/hires/funny-postcard-1.jpg

¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 14:16 (twenty years ago)

http://www.people.virginia.edu/~mmh9a/pics/funny/bear.jpg

¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 14:17 (twenty years ago)

http://www.download2me.com/pictures/bear%20leaking.jpg

¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 14:17 (twenty years ago)

http://www.funny-pictures-4all.com/polarbearwatercraft.jpg

¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 14:17 (twenty years ago)

http://www.yobbo.co.nz/photogallery/funny%20photos/bear_small.jpg

¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 14:17 (twenty years ago)

Anyone who doesn't think that there's some tangible difference in the atmosphere of ILX should read this thread from start to finish

it started in 2001 so not sure how it can portray a tangible difference - oh well

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:17 (twenty years ago)

Sometimes I'm convinced that C-man came from space.

Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:18 (twenty years ago)

Invasion Of The Bunton Snatchers

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:21 (twenty years ago)

Sometimes I'm convinced that C-man came from space.

what's certain is that he only gets to come into empty space

ken c (ken c), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:22 (twenty years ago)

'i'm only posting to try and get you guys to stop posting'

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:22 (twenty years ago)

there anythony goes again, judging people on their souls. bigot.

amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:27 (twenty years ago)

Ken C - boyo, you aint knowin nothin.

C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:37 (twenty years ago)

i guess two weeks wasn't long enough for some of the boys

kephm, Friday, 16 July 2004 14:45 (twenty years ago)

C on TWX:

ihttp://www.orangeneko.com/ rik/pages/sep.jpg

C on ILX:

ihttp://www.panmacmillan.com.au/ cover0/0752215051.jpg

Go figure.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:49 (twenty years ago)

Image posting is really hit or miss since the rehost, isn't it...

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:49 (twenty years ago)

Ohmigod, I copied and pasted the links into my browser, and it was WELL WORTH IT!!! So OTM the money is pressing a sexual harrassment suit!

Ma$onic Boom (kate), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:50 (twenty years ago)

Let me try it...

C on TWX:
http://www.orangeneko.com/rik/pages/sep.jpg

C on ILX:

http://www.panmacmillan.com.au/cover0/0752215051.jpg

Ma$onic Boom (kate), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:53 (twenty years ago)

Calum, I'd take thick legs over long skinny legs any day of the week, and that ain't no lie.

oops (Oops), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:58 (twenty years ago)

If you're into skinny legs, why not just have sex with an 11-year-old boy?

St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Friday, 16 July 2004 14:59 (twenty years ago)

you're saying that as if he doesn't want to.

ken c (ken c), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:00 (twenty years ago)

Though there is something to be said for a nice shapely pair of long legs.

oops (Oops), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:02 (twenty years ago)

oops and NA OTM. i've always argued that skinny model-type girls are just simply not as sexy as curvy, bigger girls. end of story. no lie, no bullshit.

people that lust after those skinny type gals actually fancy young boys obv.

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:02 (twenty years ago)

http://www.sheepmania.com/nat/insect/Arachnida/Arenae/dllegs02b.jpg

ken c (ken c), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:04 (twenty years ago)

^ = calum's gf.

ken c (ken c), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:04 (twenty years ago)

seriously - do an experiment: watch a crowd of pedestrians. when a skinny girl walks down the street, not many heads turn (except i guess C-Man and other people who fancy young boys). then watch how many guys take a peek when a full-figured woman passes by. PROVEN BY SCIENCE!

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:06 (twenty years ago)

i know i know... i'm avoiding the word 'fat' here, and yes, there's a difference in sexiness between 'curvy/full-figured/etc' and 'fat/obese', however i think that where that line is drawn is a matter of personal taste.

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:08 (twenty years ago)

christ 5 hours back into ILX and i'm debating on a 'fat girl' thread. i need to go drink some beer now. bye!

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:08 (twenty years ago)

You won't tell a girl to "fuck off" if she pats your ass but you sure as hell won't get off so easily if a guy does that to a girl. You know?

a girl pinched my ass at tottenham court road tube station the other day. i didn't tell he to fuck off, because it's never happened to me unexpectedly before, because i don't have to face that kind of harrassment all the time. actually, i sort of laughed in bemusement, and told my girlfriend, who was walking besides me. she laughed as well.

stevie (stevie), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:10 (twenty years ago)

also, i would NEVER pat a stranger's ass, or many of my friends'.

stevie (stevie), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:11 (twenty years ago)

WOMEN ARE SEXY FULL STOP.

The fat ones, the skinny ones, the short ones, the tall ones. A skinny girl IS NOT ACTUALLY A 10-YEAR OLD BOY. Sexiness encompasses physical beauty but is not limited to it, and is in the eye of the beholder. Y'all are acting Fark.

mookieproof (mookieproof), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:11 (twenty years ago)

I got my ass smacked by a stranger last week too! It was great!

oops (Oops), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:12 (twenty years ago)

i wasn't really flattered, because i was *not* looking HOTT that day. i think it was more a drunken gaggle going "pinch that bloke's arse" more than my appearance was really inviting an amorous groping that evening. though last night, that was a different story (and did i get pinched? did i bollocks)

stevie (stevie), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:15 (twenty years ago)

rob so totally otm - i'm off to the school yard now to get me some 11 yr old boy action. i can't believe i've been wasting my time at "bars" picking up "slimmies" all this time, when in actuality im am a gay ped0phi|e pervo¡ thanks bolton for showing me the light¡

dyson (dyson), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:16 (twenty years ago)

great chat up line for you dude, "hello 11 yr old boys, my name is dyson and i never lose my suction"

ken c (ken c), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:19 (twenty years ago)

"TEST MY TWIN CYCLONES, BIG BOY!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

ken c (ken c), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:19 (twenty years ago)

ha ha - must you englxors keep reminding me about the vacuum thing¿ i was hoping all that was behind me when i left your godforsaken island¡

dyson (dyson), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:25 (twenty years ago)

oops sorry if that came as a bit of a sucker punch!

ken c (ken c), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:31 (twenty years ago)

last week a boy gave my STOMACH a pat. (I didn't know him, he was a complete stranger)

I hope he didn't think I was pregnant. Because I was in a bar and stoned.

Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:34 (twenty years ago)

Mandee, even though you are a little chubby, I'd try to f`ck you if you didn't hate me forever!

¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿¥¤±²£¢Ð¼æ®ª«¶Þ÷³¹ß½Ø×©§¾¿ (ex , Friday, 16 July 2004 15:35 (twenty years ago)

ken, it's fine - all in good fun¡
+ sometimes i need a reminder that i do indeed suck¡

dyson (dyson), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:38 (twenty years ago)

Thanks Jon, I feel better already.

Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Friday, 16 July 2004 15:45 (twenty years ago)

This is great - all you internet geeks are trying to convince yourself that everyone who dates a hot slim girl is, in fact, a ped!!!! YES! Such great intelligence and a flawless connection there.

It's this simple. For 99% of males and females a fat body is simply unnattractive. A fat girl aint gonna pull Brad Pitt just as a fat guy is not going to pull Cameron Diaz. You can address that to when you walk into a club too - you know whose within your range and who is not.

C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:04 (twenty years ago)

Cman, do you have acne?

My New Identity Theft (ex machina), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:06 (twenty years ago)

C-man, please state your sources. 99%? It's stupid to say a fat girl isn't going to pull Brad Pitt and that a fat guy isn't going to pull Cameron Diaz, because -- well, NO ONE is going to pull either of those people.

Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:07 (twenty years ago)

Mandee, you're the one for me fatty!

My New Identity Theft (ex machina), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:08 (twenty years ago)

i think it's safe to brad has been "pulled" many times¡

dyson (dyson), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:09 (twenty years ago)

i bet 99% of male and females havne't pulled brad pitt or cameron diaz though.

ken c (ken c), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:11 (twenty years ago)

And who would want to? According to various geocities websites, Cameron Diaz has a stanky vadge.

Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:17 (twenty years ago)

I don't know about 99%, but there is some truth to what Calum says. I don't know if the refusal to acknowledge that is due to him being Calum or people being hyper-PC.

oops (Oops), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:19 (twenty years ago)

Pavarotti had a very slim even pretty girlfriend didn't he? must've been his soh

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:21 (twenty years ago)

It doesn't matter that there's some truth to it - the way he says it just makes you want to ram a jackhammer into his face AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN because he's such a nasty little cunt without the intelligence to realise how hateful he's being. Unless he's a super-genius troll (or Brad Pitt), but I think we can realistically exclude either possibility.

Markelby (Mark C), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:22 (twenty years ago)

According to various geocities websites

i see a problem

slebmags were quick to point and laugh at her dermatological probs as well but she's still an insanely beautiful woman

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:22 (twenty years ago)

I'd say the split is about 75/25 based on what's yelled at me out of car windows. So that's the asshole demographic, anyway.

teeny (teeny), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:23 (twenty years ago)

Hstencil sure does get around.

oops (Oops), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:24 (twenty years ago)

you get yelled at out of cars? i bet that so makes your day! ;)

i would compliment mandee on her looks and figure too but ya kno, i wouldn't wanna rub jon's rhubarb...

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:24 (twenty years ago)

x-post oops HAHAHAHA

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:25 (twenty years ago)

But yeah, I think that anyone who has anything for any type of specific body is a bit creepy. I get a bit creeped out at the thought of chubby chasers or whatevs.

Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:29 (twenty years ago)

*resisting urge to post banner ads for fatty porn sites*

My New Identity Theft (ex machina), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:31 (twenty years ago)

This resisting urges is a promising new step for you.

Markelby (Mark C), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:31 (twenty years ago)

you can resist urges???!!??

oops (Oops), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:32 (twenty years ago)

I can't resist Mandee....

My New Identity Theft (ex machina), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:33 (twenty years ago)

*sotto voice* duuuuuude he might hack your pc or sumpin'!*

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:33 (twenty years ago)

I'm really trying NOT to post Girls Aloud lyrics.

Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:37 (twenty years ago)

Jesus man, Pavarotti has a hot girlfriend for the same reason Johnny Vegas probably does and Hugh Hefner has about ten of the buggers... because there are always women seduced by rich men who can provide them with lots of money. That's why an old billionairre on a wheelchair can pull Anna Nicole Smith but many of us young, healthy guys cannot.

It doesn't really work the other way around because men are simply far less likely to want an older/ unnattractive rich famous woman on their arm.

P.S. And how would people on INTERNET FORUMS know about Cameron Diaz's hygeine? That girl is so hot it doesn't really matter anyway surely because at the end of the day she can any bloke in the world.

C-Man (C-Man), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:48 (twenty years ago)

Anything that has willingly touched Jared Leto can't have me, sorry.

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:56 (twenty years ago)

and ew, Timberlaken's mucky pawprints

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Friday, 16 July 2004 16:58 (twenty years ago)

I can handle an ex of Timberlake. Especially cuz that means she's tolerant of amateurish beatboxing.

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 16 July 2004 17:00 (twenty years ago)

Sweet jesus, are we still debating aesthetic preference as if it were a moral issue? *yawn*

mouse, Friday, 16 July 2004 17:00 (twenty years ago)

we're debating whether Justin Timberlake's exes are damaged goods for life. I vote no (unless they cried him a river).

CeCe Peniston (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 16 July 2004 17:03 (twenty years ago)

I like how my crack about 11-year-old boys turned into some semiserious thing. My personal views are in synch with these posts:

WOMEN ARE SEXY FULL STOP.
The fat ones, the skinny ones, the short ones, the tall ones. A skinny girl IS NOT ACTUALLY A 10-YEAR OLD BOY. Sexiness encompasses physical beauty but is not limited to it, and is in the eye of the beholder. Y'all are acting Fark.

-- mookieproof (mookieproo...), July 16th, 2004 12:11 PM. (later)

and

But yeah, I think that anyone who has anything for any type of specific body is a bit creepy. I get a bit creeped out at the thought of chubby chasers or whatevs.
-- Homosexual II (mandeewrigh...), July 16th, 2004 1:29 PM. (later)

St. Nicholas (Nick A.), Friday, 16 July 2004 17:26 (twenty years ago)

yes, well i wasn't even being slightly semi-serious about the going to a school yard thing.

dyson (dyson), Friday, 16 July 2004 17:29 (twenty years ago)

school's not even in right now - a playground is much beter idea.

dyson (dyson), Friday, 16 July 2004 17:30 (twenty years ago)

Is Jess really 6'6?

Symplistic (shmuel), Saturday, 17 July 2004 00:36 (twenty years ago)

ba-dum-bump

mookieproof (mookieproof), Saturday, 17 July 2004 00:41 (twenty years ago)

I love stomaches. This is weird, because generally I don't have a "type" of body that I fancy more than others, but when I'm in bed with a girl, there's nothing that I like more than a round stomach. You can call me a creep if you want to, Mandee. :)

Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 17 July 2004 01:35 (twenty years ago)

However, I've never even heard of a term like "chubby chaser", I just don't like skinny girls. I hope there's nothing wrong with me...

Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 17 July 2004 01:52 (twenty years ago)

Every time someone revives this thread - which was created in a particularly anguished time period for the creator - I feel like killing myself. No one ever listens to my repeated requests to delete it.

Please make it stop.

Vic (Vic), Saturday, 17 July 2004 01:59 (twenty years ago)

This thread has always been rather upsetting. Right now C-Man and Jon are pissing about but they're also being fucking hurtful, joke or no joke.

C-Man, I know you like acting like a dick to provoke a reaction, but you've too easy and audience. Go exorcise your talents on a different board. Preferably a really violent one.

Everybody else: Stop taking it all so seriously. Ignore this kind of bullshit! If it winds you up you're being suckered in and the joke's on you.

Also, Tuomas OTM.

dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 17 July 2004 02:01 (twenty years ago)

Can someone please delete this thread? Who do I have to email? How many times do I have to ask ?

Vic (Vic), Saturday, 17 July 2004 02:03 (twenty years ago)

http://www.imomus.com/ebisufatty.jpeg

Momus (Momus), Saturday, 17 July 2004 04:36 (twenty years ago)

We have a work by who must be the same sculptor on campus. It is like a 15 foot tall statue of a very fat man in a funny hat with like a six-inch penis. They've tucked it away somewhere inconspicuous.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Saturday, 17 July 2004 04:45 (twenty years ago)

They've tucked his penis away somewhere inconspicuous???

C J (C J), Saturday, 17 July 2004 06:35 (twenty years ago)

Well, if we're talking about the scale here, a six inch penis on a 15ft tall man is......not a very big penis. It's probably sufficiently tucked in and of itself.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Saturday, 17 July 2004 07:11 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, the penis is tiny to that scale, but it's the statue that's in a non-prominent area.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Saturday, 17 July 2004 07:12 (twenty years ago)

I wish I could find a better picture of it:

http://www1.umn.edu/umnnews/img/assets/4243/ex_040616_roman_warrior.jpg


I guess it doesn't look anything like the one that momus posted. I was remembering it darker and smoother.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Saturday, 17 July 2004 07:15 (twenty years ago)

Oh dear, I really should stop posting drunk. I don't even remember writing the stuff up there, hope I didn't sound snide or anything. I wish I hadn't moved to a flat with a computer and an Internet connection...

I agree with Dog Latin, C-Man and JW working in tandem was the last thing I wanted to witness too.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 17 July 2004 11:33 (twenty years ago)

Wait, wait, wait hold on a minute.... How the **FUCK** am I working with CMAN!!!! Just because I'm a jerk doesn't mean that I'm working wtih him. I was very tame here, you guys are fucking crazy hate filled fucktards if you think that.

I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Saturday, 17 July 2004 13:13 (twenty years ago)

yeh, i was drunk too.

dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 17 July 2004 13:24 (twenty years ago)

As hilarious as you may think your act is, Jon, and even though some ILXors seem to like it, I never found it funny. For me, "it's all just a joke" was never a good defense. You're not as bad as C-Man, true, which is why I hope you won't go down his way.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 17 July 2004 13:25 (twenty years ago)

I live to please you Tuomas!!!!!!!

I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Saturday, 17 July 2004 13:27 (twenty years ago)

Jon, most people see you as being in the same league as Calum, if not quite at his level. If you're not happy with that... Does it really take this comparison to make you realise what a dick you can be?

Markelby (Mark C), Saturday, 17 July 2004 13:55 (twenty years ago)

how could this entire thread have occurred without a link to

http://www.fatchicksinpartyhats.com

Vansi, Saturday, 17 July 2004 16:52 (twenty years ago)

Sometimes I think that Hollywood Eating Disorder standard for weight (think Gwenyth Paltrow) is mostly to impress women. While focusing on how men judge women, sometimes it's forgotten how judgemental women are to women. Many women will say incredibly vicious things behind the backs of each other, particularly those they percieve as less attractive or heavier than they are. I still remember Janeane Garafalo, who's supposed to be a hip enlightened feminist, making jokes about how ugly she found Paula Jones.

Calum's made several good points here, though I can't take issue about the double standards for ass-patting/pinching among strangers in public. Women are much less likely to be potential physical threat to men than vice versa.

Also, there are examples of non-leggy supermodel types who've become sex symbols. Christina Ricci is one. Janeane Garafolo is another. And in the softcore b-movie universe possibly the most popular actress going right now is the very curvy, "regular girl with a pretty face" Misty Mundae.

She's the Sherrif, Saturday, 17 July 2004 17:39 (twenty years ago)

Sometimes I think that Hollywood Eating Disorder standard for weight (think Gwenyth Paltrow) is mostly to impress women. While focusing on how men judge women, sometimes it's forgotten how judgemental women are to women. Many women will say incredibly vicious things behind the backs of each other, particularly those they percieve as less attractive or heavier than they are. I still remember Janeane Garafalo, who's supposed to be a hip enlightened feminist, making jokes about how ugly she found Paula Jones.

You may be right, but it's all a question of chicken or egg, meaning that "many women" wouldn't say such things if they hadn't learned (implicitly or explicitly) how a women "should" look from childhood on. That of course doesn't make mean comments any more acceptable.


Calum's made several good points here, though I can't take issue about the double standards for ass-patting/pinching among strangers in public. Women are much less likely to be potential physical threat to men than vice versa.

Yeah, I agree that there are a lot of double standards. For example, I've noticed that in certain "enlightened" leftist/indie/whatever circles (at least here in Finland) there isn't that much pressure for women to be thin, but there are such pressures for men. Most of my female friends don't have that a big issue with their weight, but I know several guys who do. Male anorexia has been getting more common, a good friend of mine used to suffer from it.

However, I think sometimes drawing attention to such doudle standards isn't done only out of genuine concern, but also as a sort of a backlash against feminist thought. At times I feel like this about C-Man's comments. I'm not saying these aren't serious problems; it is true that issues like women's violence towards men or weight pressures on guys have been pretty much invisible until the last few years, because such things aren't supposed to happen to men. However, an argument like: "Yeah, everyone talks about women's issues, but how about the pressures on men, no one pays attention to that!" can be used to muddle the truth. Yes, men suffer from gender-related pressures and expectations too, and attention should be paid to that, but that doesn't change the fact that such problems are a hundred times worse for women.

(Sorry, this wasn't directed against you, just clearing my thoughts.)

Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 17 July 2004 19:37 (twenty years ago)

As long as I live in a society where many young girls idolise thugs like 50 Cent or Eminem as ambassadors of masculinity and claim David Beckham and similar brainless sports morons to be icons of fashion and beauty then I will certainly not apologise for thinking that - say - Holly Valance is a sex god.

I think Christina Ricci is an attractive girl too. Women, like men, come in all shapes and sizes (I'm judging obesity here which I don't think many men or women find attractive. Ricci is still slim, I would say...) although in my experience I have found women to be as judgemental as men.

Anyway, as long as rich, ugly/ old men like Hugh Hefner dance around with 7 slim young girlfriends can anyone really take many of the comments here seriously? I don't see 7 six packed men running around with a 70 year old millionaire.

C-Man (C-Man), Saturday, 17 July 2004 20:18 (twenty years ago)

women hate each other in ways men don't. i see it my office all the time. the hot women will be nice to the fat chicks to their face, but get them away, get them among men, and their real contempt comes out.

and try making a woman jealous of another woman. the first thing most of them will say against the other woman is that she's fat or ugly.

men don't care what other men think. at least not about looks. if we aren't interested in sleeping with you then we don't care what you think of our appearance.

the way i see it:
most women = brutally insecure about their looks. especially the MOST attractive ones, oddly enough.

most men = completely in love with themselves, maybe delusionally so.

if women are competitive with each other over attrativeness, men are competitive with each other over money.

mmmmm, Saturday, 17 July 2004 20:59 (twenty years ago)

But things are changing, no? Today a lot of men do care about their appearances (and are at least a bit insecure about their looks), because money isn't a guarantee of getting women anymore. And why is that? Because most women support themselves nowadays.

Also, while you may have a point, you're making generalisations too. You should always be wary of talking of "women" or "men", as if what you're saying applies to all members of a certain gender.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 17 July 2004 21:09 (twenty years ago)

Does it really take this comparison to make you realise what a dick you can be?

who's going to save the world from being saved by mark c?

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 17 July 2004 22:41 (twenty years ago)

ME!!!!!!!

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 17 July 2004 22:41 (twenty years ago)

women hate each other...

etc...

you got this from TV

fff, Saturday, 17 July 2004 22:58 (twenty years ago)

Has anyone said "Yo momma" yet?

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Saturday, 17 July 2004 23:18 (twenty years ago)

Has anyone said "ey mann, wo ist mein auto"?

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Saturday, 17 July 2004 23:21 (twenty years ago)

???

Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 18 July 2004 08:44 (twenty years ago)

ey mann, wo ist meine steuererklaerung?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Sunday, 18 July 2004 10:38 (twenty years ago)

No one used the adjective "zaftig" yet either.

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 18 July 2004 13:54 (twenty years ago)

zaftig makes me think of heavyset middle-aged jewish ladies in ethnic-print caftans and chunky silver jewelry.

lauren (laurenp), Sunday, 18 July 2004 14:06 (twenty years ago)

Why, cause they say it?

roxymuzak (roxymuzak), Sunday, 18 July 2004 14:07 (twenty years ago)

in a husky voice.

lauren (laurenp), Sunday, 18 July 2004 14:09 (twenty years ago)

zaftig makes me think of jewish grandmas in amusement arcades with headscarves.

ken c (ken c), Sunday, 18 July 2004 14:19 (twenty years ago)

Women hate each other - LOL. Someone's just been watching Mean Girls. I like the red haired one the best in that movie, she is fine!

I think huge bums are a turn off in a girl.

C-Man (C-Man), Sunday, 18 July 2004 15:19 (twenty years ago)

takes all sorts

the neurotic awakening of sir mixalot (blueski), Sunday, 18 July 2004 18:10 (twenty years ago)

Today, I saw a woman order a coffee with low cal sweetener, followed by a bagel with cream cheese.

Like that's going to help at ALL!!!!!@!@!

http://www.sweetnlow.com/images/home/prod_packets.gif

I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:18 (twenty years ago)

maybe she was diabetic?

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:23 (twenty years ago)

She was fat; many fat people are diabetic.

I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:23 (twenty years ago)

http://gfx.dagbladet.no/dinside/2003/10/08/diabetes.jpg

I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:24 (twenty years ago)

ICH BIN DIABETIKER

I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:25 (twenty years ago)

Well, maybe she was fat, diabetic, AND DIDN'T CARE! So you're sarcasm was for nothing!

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:26 (twenty years ago)

If only I'd taken him up on his bet, Mark C would owe me BEER right now.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:27 (twenty years ago)

Hey, look at that image I linked "ICH BIN DIABETIKER"! (Tuomas, you're messing up your usage of "you're" and "your". Don't worry too much, with our shitty educational system, this mistake is common in the States! ♥)

I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:31 (twenty years ago)

I know I do it sometimes, yeah. I also tend to mix he and she because Finnish has only one (gender-neutral) word for them.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:36 (twenty years ago)

I would too, Matty boy.

Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:37 (twenty years ago)

Tuomas, thank you! I was wondering why my Finnish colleague does that sometimes.

Liz :x (Liz :x), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:39 (twenty years ago)

Tuomas, that's neat! Tell us more about your culture!

http://www.rosiesamfrodo.com/users/grate/legolas.jpg

I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:41 (twenty years ago)

That's a picture of Legolas apparently.

I CAN LEAD YOU THROUGH THE ZONE (ex machina), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:41 (twenty years ago)

As long as I live in a society where many young girls idolise thugs like 50 Cent or Eminem as ambassadors of masculinity and claim David Beckham and similar brainless sports morons to be icons of fashion and beauty then I will certainly not apologise for thinking that - say - Holly Valance is a sex god.

But C-Man, you seem to expect some kind of appplause for stating this before us, ad fricken nauseum, like you're keening for some approval of your pret a porter masculinity...

stevie (stevie), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:43 (twenty years ago)

I think we've discussed this before, but the gender-neutrality of Finnish has some implications. For example, there is a pretty well-known Finnish novel where the gender of the protagonist is never revealed, and that is possible only because we don't have genderized personal pronouns. That novel would be pretty difficult to translate into English. On the other hand, English jokes that rely on the usage of she/he, for example, are not easy to translate into Finnish.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 19 July 2004 12:47 (twenty years ago)

I feel a bit conned by gender-less narrators. I feel like I'm being consciously manipulated, though perhaps I should applaud efforts to make me take another look at my gender archetypes.

Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 19 July 2004 13:39 (twenty years ago)

so what's Finnish for transexual?

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Monday, 19 July 2004 13:41 (twenty years ago)

It's as boring as "transseksuaali".

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 19 July 2004 13:52 (twenty years ago)

that isn't boring at all!

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 19 July 2004 13:53 (twenty years ago)

two years pass...

was this violent vic, or just a guy named vic?

That one guy that quit, Friday, 6 July 2007 13:43 (seventeen years ago)

Too early for Calum

Dom Passantino, Friday, 6 July 2007 13:45 (seventeen years ago)

three months pass...

Great thread.

Dom Passantino, Saturday, 13 October 2007 17:14 (seventeen years ago)

Correctly guessed who revived it too

DJ Mencap, Saturday, 13 October 2007 17:39 (seventeen years ago)

nine months pass...

Chubby Chums Are Grateful Girls!
By George Pesante

The trouble with this country is not smog or juvenile delinquency or even TV commercials. The trouble with this country is, that it’s getting so hard to find a fat girl.

Oh, sure, they still exist, and a good thing too, because if they ever do disappear from view, we’re going to have to raise them in special herds like the vanishing buffalo.

But what with all this diet talk and reducing salons springing up to replace the corner pool room, and what with cars getting smaller, lower, the fat girl is being driven out of fashion.

This is too bad. Any man who has played parlor hockey with a fat girl knows that here is a wonderful fund of fun, frolic and felicity.

Unlike slim girls who are the darlings of modern fashion, fat girls get little attention. That means that when a man does bestow his favors upon them, they react like a St. Bernard in a sausage factory.

They laugh, they giggle, they respond to your attentions with happy shrieks. In short, they just lap it up. What’s more, they don’t need to be persuaded. Simply give them the nod and they’re off to the races. And once a fat girl gets herself in motion, she’s awfully hard to stop.

Incidentally, the old belief that fat girls are necessarily jolly girls is only sometimes true. There are plenty of fat girls who are so frustrated by their lack of male attention that they are foul-tempered, mean and sullen.

The majority of them are sunny though, and even the grumpy lumpies will respond much more quickly to a little warmth than the average slim-waisted woman.

Some girls are fat, of course, because they have glandular deficiencies and these are generally to be avoided. Frequently they have moustaches and evil tempers and are so fat as to cause topographical confusion.

On the other hand, a girl who is generously plump, simply because the good Lord made her that way, a girl who likes to eat and drink and have herself a good time — this girl is worth solid gold, all 180 pounds of her.

Another fallacy about fat girls is that they are light on their feet. This isn’t true, most of them are as heavy as all get-out. But it’s pretty easy to get them off their feet. And that’s what really counts.

A fat girl is used to the notiion that people can’t lift her up and toss her around as if she were a ballerina. Consequently, she won’t force you to go through those gymnastics. She’ll arrange herself in such a way as to spare you the grunt and groan preliminaries.

Generally speaking, fat girls have one trait in common which their slimmer sisters do not always enjoy. They tend to have skins as smooth as foam rubber and twice as bouncy.

They cost less to feed than slim girls because they go in heavy for bread and mashed potatoes and show a marked preference for beer.

Because fat girls do not get the rush that slim girls do, they don’t expect to be taken out to fancy places. They don’t expect filet mignon and champagne. The back seat of a car and a pile of sandwiches will do nicely, especially if both the sandwiches and the back seat are big.

Fat girls tend to live alone more often than slim girls. They need more room around them and also, they are embarrassed by their slimmer roommates. This makes it much easier to date a fat girl, and what’s more, to make the date pay off.

Needless to say, fat girls are a joy in the wintertime, because there’s nothing more comforting than to find yourself enfolded by great mounds of curvy girl. They are equally delightful in the summer time, however, because they like nothing on but the electric fan. And, after all, what could be more fun than that?

and what, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 04:54 (sixteen years ago)

stop posting economist articles here

s1ocki, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 05:04 (sixteen years ago)

ethan, do you:

(A) Just surf the internet normally and C&P any fucked up thing you find, which, as a result of your normal surfing habits, end up being pretty screwy...

or

(B) Actively seek out the fucked up things, and C&P for us the cream of the crop?

Either way, my god, your poor brain.

en i see kay, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 07:28 (sixteen years ago)

Big bone-ded! ba-dum crash!

deej, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 07:36 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzPP0wTj8Xs&feature=related

velko, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 07:58 (sixteen years ago)

who's going to save the world from being saved by mark c?

-- RJG (RJG), Saturday, 17 July 2004 Bookmark Link

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ME!!!!!!!
-- RJG (RJG), Saturday, 17 July 2004

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 09:23 (sixteen years ago)

ZAFTIG, mentioned above, appears late in Jonathan Lethem's novel THE FORTRESS OF SOLITUDE. I understood the word so little I had to look it up. I'm still not sure I understand it, and perhaps I understand it even less after seeing its use on this thread.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 09:25 (sixteen years ago)

George Pesante

Passantino's new pen name found!

King Boy Pato, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 09:34 (sixteen years ago)

Seriously, could any c-man or c-woman here really, honestly, be dating a person? An honest answer is required.
-- ken c (ken c), Friday, 16 July 2004

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 09:35 (sixteen years ago)

ha zaftig. margaret cho uses that word best.

Surmounter, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 13:51 (sixteen years ago)

to mean ... what?

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:05 (sixteen years ago)

chubster

Surmounter, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:06 (sixteen years ago)

gosh, I don't think that's what Lethem meant by it. Maybe I will report back on this. It's in the last quarter or so of TFoS, when Dylan Ebdus, invisible, sees a female prison guard and thinks admiringly that she's zaftig.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:18 (sixteen years ago)

margaret had a great gig about how her producers were telling her she was zaftig. and then at a restaurant she heard the waitress say "zaftig, perhaps?" but really she was saying "a soft drink, perhaps?"

mwahaha

Surmounter, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:39 (sixteen years ago)

yeah, it means thick in the good way.

Jordan, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:45 (sixteen years ago)

Curvy, soft. Pudgy maybe but in an erm extremely feminine way. Alternately it could just mean "busty".

Laurel, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:46 (sixteen years ago)

Also I don't know if you'd call a petite girl with a big rack "zaftig", I feel like there are connotations of stature as well, like, y'know "a lot of woman".

Laurel, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:47 (sixteen years ago)

sounds like my kind of tig, I mean, ting, I mean, thing.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:52 (sixteen years ago)

so is like rose mcgowan a good example of zaftig or is she still too skinny?

Surmounter, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:57 (sixteen years ago)

Far too skinny surely!

Tom D., Tuesday, 22 July 2008 14:59 (sixteen years ago)

She's not remotely chubby, is she?

Tom D., Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:00 (sixteen years ago)

A famously nearly nude Hollywood starlet like RMcG? Totally, totally way way too skinny unless you mean merely in comparison to a runway model.

Laurel, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:02 (sixteen years ago)

no, especeially not these days, but she's always pulled off that beautiful voluptuous thing

right, right, i know you're right.

Surmounter, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:03 (sixteen years ago)

Jess needs to be here to properly define this

kingfish, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:03 (sixteen years ago)

Charlotte Church?

Tom D., Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:04 (sixteen years ago)

RIP Jess's definitions

Laurel, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:07 (sixteen years ago)

Re Charlotte Church, a quick GIS says "maybe, depending on which photo yer talking about" to me.

Laurel, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:12 (sixteen years ago)

She is zaftig these days

Tom D., Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:14 (sixteen years ago)

The point is sort of that zaftig is a folk term, and was born from the Ashkenazic population of sort of famously peasant-y Eastern Europeans (I think, don't ask me to trace it back any farther). I would say that a) it's all relative, and b) there's an essential earthiness or hmm... suggestion of bounty, fertility.

Laurel, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:14 (sixteen years ago)

sounds otm to me

Surmounter, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:15 (sixteen years ago)

zaf·tig Audio Help /ˈzɑftɪk, -tɪg/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[zahf-tik, -tig] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective Slang.
1. Gianna Michaels, fer real

yungblut, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:16 (sixteen years ago)

http://bengals.hp.infoseek.co.jp/pict/past_player/ickey_shuffle03.jpg

yungblut, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 15:16 (sixteen years ago)

180 lbs isn't fat! Not if you're tall, anyway. I mean it's not skinny, either...was that article written by an R. Crumb of 1918?

Abbott, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:04 (sixteen years ago)

Funnily enough I was watching the new American Gladiators show last night and they give height and weight for the glads -- and none of the women was admitted to be over 155 lbs even though they ranged from 5'7" to 5'10" and clearly all had shoulders and thighs the size of quarterbacks'. I do respectfully suggest that that is extremely unlikely; 180 sounds far more probable (and healthful).

Laurel, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:27 (sixteen years ago)

i would suggest that you are right about that

rrrobyn, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 18:39 (sixteen years ago)

are fat girls really sluttier??

homosexual II, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 19:03 (sixteen years ago)

okay, SLUTTIER is not the word.
easier to get in the sack?

i guess as a ZAFTIG girl myself I should know the answer to that

homosexual II, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 19:04 (sixteen years ago)

Googled for the legernd that is George Pesante and found that the article is from a 1962 bongo mag:

http://www.erosblog.com/2008/07/17/chubby-girl-1962/

(nsfw pic, btw)

Bodrick III, Tuesday, 22 July 2008 19:34 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.