― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 13:57 (twenty years ago)
La Haine (74 points, 3 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0002HSDVY.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
Comments?
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:04 (twenty years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:07 (twenty years ago)
The Crying Game (74 points, 4 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00006FI3R.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:08 (twenty years ago)
Sweet and Lowdown (75 points, 6 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B000050GPQ.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:12 (twenty years ago)
― emil.y (emil.y), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:15 (twenty years ago)
Secrets and Lies (75 points, 4 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00005NWZK.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:16 (twenty years ago)
― emil.y (emil.y), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:16 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:17 (twenty years ago)
After Life (76 points, 4 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004U1F9.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:20 (twenty years ago)
xpost
― emil.y (emil.y), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:20 (twenty years ago)
My wife and I are INFATUATED with Brenda Blethyn's character in "Secrets and Lies"!!!! She's one of the greatest cinematic creations ever.
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:21 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:21 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:22 (twenty years ago)
― emil.y (emil.y), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:22 (twenty years ago)
Taste of Cherry (77 points, 5 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/6305362688.01.LZZZZZZZ.gif
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:24 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:24 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:27 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:27 (twenty years ago)
The Blair Witch Project (78 points, 5 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004S8GT.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Probably best seen on the big screen, before the hype. Give yourself over to its horror, and you're rewarded with plausible characters not killed for their sins (as in every other horror movie) but merely made the pure victims of a good setup (just like you)."
-- Pete Scholtes
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:28 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:30 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:30 (twenty years ago)
Sean Penn's perf in S&D is absolutely beautiful -- and the ending a heart-rending improvement on La Strada -- but the only Allen '90s films I like a LOT are Husbands & Wives and Deconstructing Harry (neither of which made my cut either).
Kore-eda's new film opens in NYC on Friday.
I was bored out of my skull at the Blair Witch con. A woman came up to me afterwards and asked what happened at the end, and I said "They got our $10."
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:31 (twenty years ago)
(x-post)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:31 (twenty years ago)
― emil.y (emil.y), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:32 (twenty years ago)
Naked Lunch (79 points, 7 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0000CDUT5.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:34 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:34 (twenty years ago)
Anyway, did anyone nominate Last Broadcast? Don't remember seeing it on the list.
― emil.y (emil.y), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:35 (twenty years ago)
Er, no. The great thing about it is how it manages to mix social commentary (the situation of immigrants in the suburbs) with personal drama (especially in the finale, but I won't go into detail about that, don't want to spoil the film).
Yeah, but if there wasn't the witch shit, then it'd be 'some teenagers camping in the woods' and nothing else. They're there because of the witch shit.
There are a lots of psychological thrillers that don't need any supernatural thrills to work, no?
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:37 (twenty years ago)
'no', and 'so what?'
― Miles Finch, Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:39 (twenty years ago)
And Tuomas, yes, of course. But the reason they were in the woods was to research a myth that they didn't believe in - and we don't believe in - so they are cornered by their own scepticism when things start going all freaky, man. It's an angle (admittedly, one done many times before, but I think it works).
― emil.y (emil.y), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:39 (twenty years ago)
Clueless (79 points, 8 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0000505GY.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Same light and empathetic tone as Fast Times at Ridgemont High, same familiarity with actual teen life, but with the Heathers Heathers taking center stage, and in a plot out of Jane Austen's Emma. Alicia Silverstone somehow makes getting mugged funny. In fact, she makes just about every real emotion she expresses funny. Later amplified to brilliant slapstick by Reese Witherspoon in Legally Blonde, but with less reality."
"I wonder if Alicia Silverstone is pissed about Reese Witherspoon stealing her career."
-- D. Keebler
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:40 (twenty years ago)
― emil.y (emil.y), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:42 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:44 (twenty years ago)
*recount suppressed by governmental order, indifference of the press*
okay never mind then
― The Obligatory Sourpuss (Begs2Differ), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:46 (twenty years ago)
Twelve Monkeys (80 points, 9 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004R78L.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:46 (twenty years ago)
― emil.y (emil.y), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:47 (twenty years ago)
Buffalo 66 (80 points, 6 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0000SVWEA.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Yes, I know he’s a scumbag, but how can you not love a film where the first ten minutes are a portrayal of one man’s valiant quest to have a piss?"
-- emil.y
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:50 (twenty years ago)
More probably later tonight.
You mean like Little Caesar, Hawks' Scarface, The Public Enemy, Angels with Dirty Faces, The Godfather Part II...
Look, I like it -- or did the single time I saw it. It's certainly superior to a comic-book parody like Miller's Crossing. The only crime movie I voted for was Goodfellas (and, depending on yr definition, Man Bites Dog).
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 February 2005 14:57 (twenty years ago)
― Miles Finch, Thursday, 3 February 2005 15:01 (twenty years ago)
#89
Amateur (82 points, 4 votes)
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0000CDRW0.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 15:08 (twenty years ago)
On 'still' being a gangster movie... in the 8th or 9th decade of the genre, you hafta be revolutionary to impress me, and I think Goodfellas meets that criterion better.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 February 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)
The first half was engrossing, but I think it was the second half that was even more impressive to me. There was something uncanny about the effect of watching those "endless rehearsals" as you called them - I thought it was quite poignant. Somehow the idea that you would work and work to get that perfect moment just right, juxtaposed with the serendipitous and fleeting way those moments actually occur in real life - it kind of erased the division between the mundane and the exceptional. A great, great film - it was #7 on my list.
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 3 February 2005 15:22 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 February 2005 15:24 (twenty years ago)
Hmm, isn't the whole point of the film that he's a scumbag, yet in some odd way we can relate to him. Or maybe that is exactly what you're saying there.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 3 February 2005 15:32 (twenty years ago)
― emil.y (emil.y), Thursday, 3 February 2005 15:36 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 3 February 2005 16:09 (twenty years ago)
SPOILERS
The difference between the titles you mention and La Haine is that it is *not* a gangster film, it's a film about the youth in poor surburbs - which makes it more poignant and easier to relate to than yer basic crime flick. The key moment in the film is right before the finale, where it is made clear that the protagonists are not gangstas when they - despite the audience expextations - decide not to use the gun after all. Until, of course, they are forced to. The final scene becomes more powerful due to the fact that the person who fires the final shot is the member of the trio most staunchly against violence.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 3 February 2005 17:15 (twenty years ago)
Since B66's release, it has been diminished by the knowledge Gallo was hardly acting in the role. (My fave VG performance is still Arizona Dream.)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 February 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)
Happy Together (83 points, 5 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0000C665G.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:17 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:23 (twenty years ago)
Gummo (83 points, 4 votes, 1 first place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B000059HA8.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:24 (twenty years ago)
Gattaca (83 points, 6 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004CXWW.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:26 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:28 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)
Casino (83 points, 5 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004CZ56.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:31 (twenty years ago)
― David Merryweather (DavidM), Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:32 (twenty years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:34 (twenty years ago)
I think Clueless and Sweet & Lowdown are the only ones I voted for thus far. I'm still holding out hope for Tank Girl.
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)
Casino is a retread. A good one, but still.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:37 (twenty years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:37 (twenty years ago)
i really didn't like gattaca much at all, but that might have been a function of having terribly high expectations.
― andrew s (andrew s), Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:47 (twenty years ago)
― andrew s (andrew s), Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:49 (twenty years ago)
Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey (83 points, 6 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00005KIVU.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
Comments, dude?
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:51 (twenty years ago)
― David Merryweather (DavidM), Thursday, 3 February 2005 18:55 (twenty years ago)
― andrew s (andrew s), Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)
The Apostle (86 points, 5 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/0783227426.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Southern rural preacher commits crime, goes on lam, starts new church where nobody knows him. Beautifully written and acted movie is a little like Night of the Hunter if the children and Robert Mitchum were melded into one character, him chasing himself downriver."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:07 (twenty years ago)
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:17 (twenty years ago)
All About My Mother
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004RCPR.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:28 (twenty years ago)
haha Ok, good luck, dude. You know how on South park sometimes they have Cartman make horrible fun of the handicapped or something, but it's ok because you understand that Cartman is an asshole? It's like that, without Cartman.
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:30 (twenty years ago)
Fucking Amal (Show Me Love) (89 points, 5 votes)
http://blogsimages.skynet.be/images/000/015/722_fuckingamal.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:37 (twenty years ago)
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:40 (twenty years ago)
A Brighter Summer Day A Moment of Innocence An Angel at My Table Ashes of Time Before Sunrise Boiling Point A Scene at the Sea Casino Centre Stage Christmas in August Chungking Express Eat Drink Man Woman Fallen Angels Fireworks Flirt Flowers of Shanghai Ghost in the Shell Goodbye South, Goodbye Goodfellas Green Snake Hard-Boiled Heat Henry Fool Jerry Maguire Jungle Fever Maborosi Pola X Princess Mononoke Raise the Red Lantern Run Lola Run Safe Simple Men Trust Sonatine Springtime in My Hometown Taste of Cherry The Apple The Blade The Blue Kite The Chinese Feast The Flower of My Secret The Hunt for Red October The Insider The Last of the Mohicans The Long Day Closes The Mission The Power of Kangwon Province The Puppetmaster The River The Hole The Silence of the Lambs The Suspended Step of the Stork The Thin Red Line Through the Olive Trees Life and Nothing More… Too Many Ways to Be No. 1 Topsy-Turvy Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me Vive l’Amour
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:40 (twenty years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:41 (twenty years ago)
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:43 (twenty years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:43 (twenty years ago)
― youn, Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:52 (twenty years ago)
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:53 (twenty years ago)
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:53 (twenty years ago)
Gattaca is the kind of film s/f freeks fuss over -- ambitious concept, weak third act, etc. See also Code 46.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:56 (twenty years ago)
heh, no, but I should have suspected something since the DeNiro movie was 1986.
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 3 February 2005 19:58 (twenty years ago)
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 3 February 2005 20:03 (twenty years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 3 February 2005 20:10 (twenty years ago)
― Dr. Z Indahouse (AaronHz), Thursday, 3 February 2005 20:55 (twenty years ago)
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 3 February 2005 20:59 (twenty years ago)
or something like that.
― Dr. Z Indahouse (AaronHz), Thursday, 3 February 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Thursday, 3 February 2005 21:17 (twenty years ago)
― Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Thursday, 3 February 2005 21:54 (twenty years ago)
― Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Thursday, 3 February 2005 21:57 (twenty years ago)
― Pete Scholtes, Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:17 (twenty years ago)
-- Amateur(ist) (amateurist@gmail.com), February 3rd, 2005 1:40 PM.
There we go, that's more like it. Administrators, lock this thread.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:22 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:23 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:24 (twenty years ago)
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:25 (twenty years ago)
-- Riot Gear! (speed.to.roa...), February 3rd, 2005
You're speaking my language man, I think I wrote something RE: Anthony Wong in one of my blurbs. Still haven't managed to catch The Mission (can't find it anywhere), but it's high on my to-see list.
― Mil (Mil), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:26 (twenty years ago)
I couldn't remember if it was "lowly", "mere" or something else.
― Dr. Z Indahouse (AaronHz), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:27 (twenty years ago)
Uh, I offered to write comments but wasn't given any films to write about.
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:41 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:42 (twenty years ago)
Actually, I was sad that Freeway didn't get nominated. Rent it now, if you haven't. It's Witherspoon's best performance by light years...
― Pete Scholtes, Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:43 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:44 (twenty years ago)
Still, the nominations thread was littered with Girolamo's desperate pleas for people to submit comments (any comments), so I still don't buy the arguement.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:46 (twenty years ago)
― andrew s (andrew s), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:48 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:48 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:55 (twenty years ago)
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Thursday, 3 February 2005 22:58 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:02 (twenty years ago)
I was pretty surprised by Bogus Journey as well, because it was clearly weaker than the first Bill & Ted movie. Were people voting for it as an substitute for Excellent Adventure, since the latter was made in the eighties?
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:17 (twenty years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:30 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:34 (twenty years ago)
It's so cute that you assume I have a heart.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:36 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:41 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:45 (twenty years ago)
― andrew s (andrew s), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:47 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 3 February 2005 23:48 (twenty years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Friday, 4 February 2005 00:05 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 4 February 2005 00:06 (twenty years ago)
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Friday, 4 February 2005 00:54 (twenty years ago)
The bad news: My laptop (which has the results) has a dead power adapter, and I don't want to use the battery unless absolutely necessary until I get a new one. (I'm posting this from different computer, obv.)
You might have to wait a day or two for more results.
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 10:05 (twenty years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 14:37 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 4 February 2005 14:40 (twenty years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 14:50 (twenty years ago)
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Friday, 4 February 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 4 February 2005 16:09 (twenty years ago)
It's called THEATUH!!!
How many total ballots were there?
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 February 2005 16:10 (twenty years ago)
― youn, Friday, 4 February 2005 16:18 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:07 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:08 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:09 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)
could you stop that listing Lucas?
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:11 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:12 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:13 (twenty years ago)
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:13 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:14 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:15 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:16 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:17 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:18 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:19 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:20 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:20 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)
― bass braille (....), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:21 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:22 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:23 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:24 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:25 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:26 (twenty years ago)
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:26 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:27 (twenty years ago)
...let me take a break to call you a PHAG.
― lucas jr, Friday, 4 February 2005 18:29 (twenty years ago)
― Jimmy Mod always makes friends with women before bedding them down (ModJ), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:30 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)
because i changed his password :D
― bass braille (....), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:34 (twenty years ago)
It wasn't an insult.
― lucas2, Friday, 4 February 2005 18:34 (twenty years ago)
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:34 (twenty years ago)
― lucas2 (Tuomas), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:36 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:37 (twenty years ago)
moderator! moderator! moderator! -- Pears can just fuck right off. (fluxion2...), February 4th, 2005.
oh... what upsets people these days... you must do something important for a living
― lucas2, Friday, 4 February 2005 18:45 (twenty years ago)
― lucas2, Friday, 4 February 2005 18:48 (twenty years ago)
― lucas2, Friday, 4 February 2005 18:49 (twenty years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:52 (twenty years ago)
― bass braille (....), Friday, 4 February 2005 18:53 (twenty years ago)
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Friday, 4 February 2005 19:20 (twenty years ago)
Frantic trip to Regent Street Apple Store = no money left, but a functional computer. I also spent today telling BT to fuck off - if they couldn't transfer my broadband between two central London addresses within six weeks, they don't deserve my business.
Anyway, that's another story.
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)
Out of Sight (90 points, 6 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004CZAO.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"A showcase for its cinematographer, for George Clooney's charm, for flashbacks and crosscutting, for Steve Zahn and Don Cheadle working their mojo, and for somehow making JLo's underplaying look good. In other words, a showcase for Soderbergh, except that he's mustered an ending that I can press "stop" before ever watching again. (Blame Elmore Leonard's source novel if you like.)"
"Out of Sight is a very slick action movie without much action. Beautifully shot, Clooney's totally loveable, as is J Lo. Their sex scene = one of my favorite scenes in any movie ever."
-- Yanc3y
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 20:22 (twenty years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 20:23 (twenty years ago)
Leon, aka The Professional (90 points, 6 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004R84D.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Crooked Cop Gary Oldman and his cronies come back to the apartment to execute young Natalie Portman's family. During the proceedings, an old lady neighbor pokes her head out to chastise and is warned by an Oldman lackey to go back inside. She doesn't. Oldman casually fires off a round or two in her direction. "HE SAID, GO BACK INSIDE!""
-- Alex in NYC
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 20:40 (twenty years ago)
Bottle Rocket (92 points, 6 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B000171RA4.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Indie filmmakers recast themselves as nerd thieves, knocking over the Barnes & Noble, hitting up James Caan for cred (see Peter Falk and Puffy in Made). They might also feel guilty about the initial lack of minority characters."
"Even though filmgoers barely pay attention to his newer films, Jean-Luc Godard remains one of the most referenced living directors. The thing is, when a late-model film gets dubbed “Godardian,” it’s often due to an editing style or an individual character’s style of dress. What’s forgotten is that ol’ JLG had an excellent sense of the absurd. His crooks (they never could ascend to the title of criminal) were (day)dreamers who got in over there heads as not an accident but as a god-given right. This wasn’t lost on Wes Anderson, and it shows in every frame of Bottle Rocket."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 20:51 (twenty years ago)
Schizopolis (96 points, 6 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0000BUZKS.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"I finally saw "Schizopolis" this weekend--I have a new found respect for Soderberg now. What an incredibly funny & daring film: it's like the bastard child of Jean-Luc Godard and Woody Allen."
-- jay blanchard
"This movie is kind of thing that could only happen in Charlie Kaufman’s greatest day of dreaming and/or wanking. But it didn’t. The best “Lost Film” of the decade."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 20:59 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 February 2005 21:01 (twenty years ago)
Hard Boiled (97 points, 4 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/1559408677.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Anthony Wong: hands down the greatest bad-guy actor of this era."
-- Mil
"Hard Boiled does not glorify slaughter. The slaughter is carried out like a ballet, very artistic, but still appalingly bloody. Even among the killers there is a sense of good (note how Chow Yun Fat and his nemesis agree to a pause in the action in order to free the hospital patients) and Tony Leung never sees the end credits! Who the fuck would have expected that?"
-- CRW
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 21:12 (twenty years ago)
Actually, Woo made this film as a response (perhaps indirectly) to what were called the "triad recruitment" films that were coming out in HK at that time, some that were merely gangster films, others that were quite possibly financed by the triads and used as sly bits of propaganda. He decided to make Anthony Wong as evil as possible in this one, shooting up nurses and patients and such. What's funny is AW didn't do a lot for me in this film, I think it's an average performance. He went on to give a great, great performance in many other films, especially the awkwardly titled Beast Cops.
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 4 February 2005 21:19 (twenty years ago)
The Straight Story (98 points, 7 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004SX6X.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Second only to Pulp Fiction on my decade list, this movie starts with a great story: An old man travels across a couple states on his lawnmower to see his dying brother. Like The Dreamlife of Angels, it's one of those few movies about kindness that isn't sappy, and it mines each scene for the feelings that most movies would have only hinted at or alluded to. The conversation between the two old vets in the bar, talking about World War II, might be Lynch's best moment since "In Dreams" in Blue Velvet, and is more powerful than ten Saving Private Ryans."
"it's the type of movie i think i could sit down with my mum and enjoy together, and we have the most polar opposite taste in films imaginable."
"I watched The Straight Story again recently and realized it might be one of my favorite of his films (as opposed to the first time I watched it, where my reaction could be summed up as such: "WTF?"). It's very touching, and about as involving as a film with so little "action" gets."
-- nickalicious
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 21:22 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 February 2005 21:32 (twenty years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 21:34 (twenty years ago)
xpost - I don't know if I hate Saving Private Ryan as much as I used to. I've mostly forgotten the last 2 hours with the Spielberg schmaltz laid on thick. But I'll still take Band of Brothers any day.
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Friday, 4 February 2005 21:37 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 February 2005 21:45 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 4 February 2005 21:46 (twenty years ago)
― Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Friday, 4 February 2005 21:48 (twenty years ago)
Short Cuts (98 points, 7 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B000305ZXO.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"The best and worst of Altman, on one stoned and horny summer day."
"If not Altman’s best film, Short Cuts is his ultimate statement. Here he finally pulls off the giant mosaic he’d been aiming at for, oh, about 20+ years. It helps that there was good source material (Carver’s stories), and for once there was also a clear plan of attack (as opposed to Nashville, which was sort of accidental epic, and it shows.) Extra points for succeeding in spite of Andie McDowell’s shaky southern accent."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 21:50 (twenty years ago)
Schindler's List (98 points, 5 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004R6O5.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"I think it's a very good film. It might even be the only Spielberg film I unproblematically like. Spielberg plays to his strengths this time, as the Holocaust is the kind of subject that invites you to put the audience through an emotional wringer."
-- DV
"Was Schindler a reluctant hero or sly opportunist? Or both? Our slick opportunist director doesn't pretend to know for sure. But he applies all his big-film skills heroically as producer-director to make an epic that moves like a musical, and makes me cry even as I resent Spielberg for accepting that Oscar on behalf of Holocaust victims."
"I'm mixed on this movie - overall, I think it is effective - I think the brutal clearing of the Jewish ghetto (in Cracow I think) during the first third is brilliant filmaking and the presentation of the inhumanity of the Nazi true believers (like Fiennes' character) was well done - also, the rendering of Schindler in the first 3/4 of the movie as an unrepentant war profiteer is much more credible (see recent book exposing the depths of the real life Schindler's money-grubbing ways) than the "happy ending" transformation."
-- j.m. lockery
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 22:06 (twenty years ago)
Wait, isn't that her real accent?
― Pete SCholtes, Friday, 4 February 2005 22:16 (twenty years ago)
― Curious George Rides a Republican (Rock Hardy), Friday, 4 February 2005 22:19 (twenty years ago)
Drunken Master II (The Legend of Drunken Master) (99 points, 6 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B000056VOK.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"See Drunken Master II as the pinnacle of Jackie's balance between comedy and fighting ability."
-- Kingfish
"His best film is probably Drunken Master 2. Nice history lesson, fasntastically lyrical action, proper subboss-subboss-boss action progression."
-- Andrew Farrell
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 22:21 (twenty years ago)
Two big goofs in Schindler: red dress girl, and "I could've saved one more person" hug scene.
ET > Empire of the Sun > Amistad > his 70s stuff > Schindler
DM2 is one of the best comedies of the decade.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 February 2005 22:23 (twenty years ago)
― Curious George Rides a Republican (Rock Hardy), Friday, 4 February 2005 22:25 (twenty years ago)
Beau travail (100 points, 6 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004Y3PJ.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Claire Denis is my favorite filmmaker, honest - how to find space here & say I really *love* the last scene that leaves you reeling in Beau Travail."
-- daria gray
"'Beau Travail' rocks! As well as a good and original literary adaptation, its a visually stunning commentary of Frantz Fanon's ideas of psychoanalytical trauma (what about that chopped up narrative?) and cultural displacement in an era of post-colonialism. At least that's what she told me. Anyway, just sit back and watch the colours! What cinematography!"
-- Will McKenzie
"Sheer, moving poetic genius with an end sequence to end all end sequences – there is nothing in cinema, that I have seen, quite like it in fact. Startling, bizarre, and acutely poignant, once seen – it is never forgotten."
-- Alex K.
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 22:31 (twenty years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Friday, 4 February 2005 22:32 (twenty years ago)
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Saturday, 5 February 2005 01:10 (twenty years ago)
― bass braille (....), Saturday, 5 February 2005 03:52 (twenty years ago)
― lucas2, Saturday, 5 February 2005 03:52 (twenty years ago)
― lucas2, Saturday, 5 February 2005 03:54 (twenty years ago)
― lucas2, Saturday, 5 February 2005 03:55 (twenty years ago)
― lucas2, Saturday, 5 February 2005 03:56 (twenty years ago)
― lucas23, Saturday, 5 February 2005 03:57 (twenty years ago)
― lucas23, Saturday, 5 February 2005 03:58 (twenty years ago)
― lucas33, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:00 (twenty years ago)
― lucas45, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:01 (twenty years ago)
― lucas63, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:02 (twenty years ago)
― lucas20, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:02 (twenty years ago)
― lucas19, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:03 (twenty years ago)
― lucas18, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:04 (twenty years ago)
― lucas17, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:05 (twenty years ago)
― lucas1616, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:06 (twenty years ago)
― lucas16, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:06 (twenty years ago)
― lucas15.15, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:07 (twenty years ago)
― lucas14-14, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:08 (twenty years ago)
― lucas13-13, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:09 (twenty years ago)
― lucas12.12, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:09 (twenty years ago)
― Lucas_eleven, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:10 (twenty years ago)
― lucas_TEN, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:11 (twenty years ago)
― lucas_NINE, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:14 (twenty years ago)
― lucas_8, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:15 (twenty years ago)
― lucas_seven, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:16 (twenty years ago)
― lucas_six, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:17 (twenty years ago)
― lucas_five, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:18 (twenty years ago)
― lucas-four, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:19 (twenty years ago)
― lucas-3, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:21 (twenty years ago)
― lucas-2, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:22 (twenty years ago)
Thanks for your support.
― lucas_is_the_ONE, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:24 (twenty years ago)
― bass braille (....), Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:27 (twenty years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:27 (twenty years ago)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i dont. -- bass braille (...), February 4th, 2005.
bass, you're an ass. i didn't know this joint was a private party for snips like you. maybe you ought to direct a bottle or two in the right direction so you can cope a little better with what ails you.
peace
― lucas_in_amerika, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:34 (twenty years ago)
― bass braille (....), Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:37 (twenty years ago)
― lucas_on_the_mtr, Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:42 (twenty years ago)
but she actually is a southerner! she sucks though.
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:46 (twenty years ago)
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Saturday, 5 February 2005 04:48 (twenty years ago)
"Claire Denis' Beau travail, alongside Bruno Dumont's L'Humanité, is a French film I wouldn't suggest to those who get easily bored at the cinema. But if one is willing to forget the conventions of narrative cinema and accept the sometimes documentarian, sometimes corporeally poetic way Beau travail approaches it's subject, this should be a true treat for both the eye and the mind.
The story is very simple: Galoup, a sergeant in the French Foreign Legion, has to deal with his jealousy and envy, when a new recruit called Sentain becomes a hero in the eyes of his men. Alongside Galoup's soldiers, the only other important player in this bizarre drama is Forestier, Galoup's superior, who he obviously admires, but who doesn't share his resentment for Sentain. Gradually, Galoup's envy for Sentain becomes too much for him to take, and his downward spiral begins.
Denis depicts, with a great sense of detail, how the military routines dominate every aspect of the legionnaires' (and especially Galoup's) life. This is portrayed effectively in the beginning of the film, when the soldiers' crude attempts to dance in a disco are compared to their beautiful, elegant movements during physical training. To Galoup, military discipline has become the only form of self-expression, and for this reason he hates Sentain, who tries to bring a little more humanity to the camp. Or does he? A curious aspect of the film is that we never see any of the things Galoup, in his narrative, accuses Sentain of. Only in the end Sentain acts against Galoup's strict orders, and this could be seen as counterreaction to Galoup's obvious hatred towards him and his unreasonable forms of punishment; the humane deed Sentain commits is something any soldier, who isn't thoroughly programmed, would do. Since the story is told from Galoup's point of view, it could be argued that he has become paranoid, that as soldier without a war or an enemy he is only looking for a target for his emotional output (which the military life has distorted into hatred and envy), and Sentain, because of his one act of heroism, happens to be an apt target.
The above, however, isn't the only way to interpret the story. It is quite possible that Sentain acts the way Galoup says he does, and this turns the movie into a triangle (or a rectangle) drama between Galoup, Sentain and his men, possibly even his superior. The only thing Galoup's seems to (or is able to) care about is the military, and disciplining the legionnaires is his way of showing his affection. But this balance is broken by Sentain, whom the men admire, and who's actions are approved by Forestier. Since Galoup fears he is about to lose the very substance of his life, he reacts the only way is familiar with: by tightening his rule. Galoup's behaviour is, of course, bound to have repercussions, but there is no other option he can possibly think of.
Besides the way military life takes control of the men, Denis' other obvious point is to show how absurd and pointless the army routines appear through the eyes of an outsider. During the film we see countless training sessions and war excercises and witness the soldiers' dull everyday life, but never do we see them doing anything useful. At one time the legionnaires build a camp in the desert, but the only reason for this seems to be Galoup's desire to get some action to the bored men. Beau travail's antimilitaristic theme becomes even more obvious, when the legionnaires' life is shown in contrast of the Africans who neighbour them. These people shepherd their herd, weave mats, sell things, make food, and watch with astonishment as the soldiers dig a hole in the middle of nowhere. The personal drama in the film becomes even more tragic, when Denis shows just how meaningless is the system that produces these kind of human beings. In the terrific final scene we see the whole scale of Galoup's desperation, as it becomes obvious that he can never be anything but a sad, retired army officer with no chance of fitting into the civilian world."
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 5 February 2005 11:57 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 5 February 2005 16:32 (twenty years ago)
Starship Troopers (101 points, 8 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004CYIZ.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"I remember waiting for this to come out in 1997 and excited by the prospect of another Verhoeven sci-fi film, even though the early word was that it was mediocre. It ends up being only an even more devastating satire than Robocop!
It ranks highly in my list of favorite films from the past ten years, and I imagine it will only grow in stature over time."
-- Gear!
"I don't think Starship Troopers is neccessarily a satire of fascism per se--sure it is on some level, but what really interests me about the movie is how it implicates its genre, the big action-event movie, as a form with fascistic, nationalistic tendencies."
-- slutsky
"He's afraid!!!"
"This is one of the greatest satires I've ever seen, specifically because it doesn't let on its agenda (the "Do You Want To Know More?" commercials are the only obvious winks). The film was villified upon release for its celebration of fascism and its casting of American actors as Brazilians and for the "90210" cast and so on. Which misses the point completely. Paul Verhoeven made a propaganda film depicting a fascist, militaristic world. To take it further, he depicted a futuristic world overrun by American imperialism and defined by its ability to destroy any enemies that came into view. It could also be suggested that the event igniting the war against the bugs is merely an excuse to destroy a convenient and easily hated enemy. It's as if Verhoeven made this film post-9/11, for all the parallels it holds with America over the past several years. Oh, and it's a well-crafted, gory, funny adventure story too. Just don't forget you're slyly being duped into rooting for Nazis. Which is perhaps the whole point."
-- Jimmy J.
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 5 February 2005 20:00 (twenty years ago)
The Butcher Boy (102 points, 6 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004CWWR.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
""Fer feck's sake, Francie..." At last a childhood nightmare full of humor and brutality, free of tweeness."
-- Dr Morbius
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 5 February 2005 20:09 (twenty years ago)
L.A. Confidential (105 points, 10 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004CXMU.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 5 February 2005 20:16 (twenty years ago)
Jacob's Ladder (105 points, 7 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B000087I1X.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"The scene close to the end of 'Jacob's Ladder' where his Chiropractor/Guardian Angel, Louie, is explaining about how the Demons he sees are really Angels and how he must let go so those Angels can take him away to be at peace, then Jake gets up and walks a few faltering steps and Louie, with a beautific smile clasps his hands and says quietly 'Hallelujah'."
-- mzui
""Jacob's Ladder" worked me over pretty good. We were on our way home from the theater and I was okay as long as I didn't have to talk, but then my wife asked me something and I just lost it. Had to pull over on the side of the highway and fall apart for a while; meantime my wife was wondering if I was having a nervous breakdown."
-- William Crump
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 5 February 2005 20:29 (twenty years ago)
I have never understood Basinger's Oscar-worthiness in this movie, and in fact consider the love story to be the least interesting thing about LA Confidential. No matter. The movie is otherwise full of fantastic performances, particularly from Russell Crowe. Remember when he was a find, an exciting young actor, before he became the outsized Russell Crowe, the laconic and brutish starlett-fucker?
But most importantly, LA Confidential makes movie mythology that did not exist before it -- a Los Angeles every bit as violent and intriguing as gangsterland Chicago. Chinatown, for all its style, was not really about Los Angeles. It was about Jack Nicholson, mainly, and some water diversion and incest. LA Confidential is about the kind of racial tension and corruption and celebrity obsession that could not happen anywhere else. Most movies about LA are about how stylish and/or vapid the place is. This one is about how ugly and alive and real it is, and it's brilliant.
― Pears can just fuck right off. (kenan), Saturday, 5 February 2005 20:37 (twenty years ago)
Run Lola Run (106 points, 8 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004RCNJ.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"East and West Germany crash into each other, create techno-soundtracked metaphor."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 5 February 2005 20:42 (twenty years ago)
*or possibly wrong
― Curious George Rides a Republican (Rock Hardy), Saturday, 5 February 2005 20:43 (twenty years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 5 February 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)
― Pete Scholtes, Saturday, 5 February 2005 21:32 (twenty years ago)
― mentalist (mentalist), Sunday, 6 February 2005 01:06 (twenty years ago)
― Dr. Z Indahouse (AaronHz), Sunday, 6 February 2005 01:10 (twenty years ago)
Also, Jacob's Ladder is the 90s Angel Heart, a one-trick short story in search of a director.
― noodle vague (noodle vague), Sunday, 6 February 2005 01:23 (twenty years ago)
― Mobile Onion, Sunday, 6 February 2005 02:08 (twenty years ago)
If there is another movie that has been more overrated than this one I'd like to see it just so I can say I have seen the most overrated movie of all time.
― lucas (lucas), Sunday, 6 February 2005 02:18 (twenty years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Sunday, 6 February 2005 02:39 (twenty years ago)
the key word is most.
― lucas (lucas), Sunday, 6 February 2005 02:42 (twenty years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Sunday, 6 February 2005 02:44 (twenty years ago)
― lucas (lucas), Sunday, 6 February 2005 02:47 (twenty years ago)
(in other words, keep on doin' whatchu doin', lucas.)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Sunday, 6 February 2005 02:57 (twenty years ago)
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Sunday, 6 February 2005 20:05 (twenty years ago)
LA Confidential's last 8 minutes or so are crap.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 7 February 2005 14:15 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 7 February 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)
Agreed, except this is a good thing.
― Pete Scholtes, Monday, 7 February 2005 19:49 (twenty years ago)
― bass braille (....), Monday, 7 February 2005 22:48 (twenty years ago)
The Limey (107 points, 9 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004W0T5.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"The Limey totally kicks ass and everyone should see it. It abandons any pretension or whatever that fogs up a lot of the other Soderbergh films. It also is nothing like Oceans Eleven. It's a lot more straightforward/less ridiculous/and actually more fun (sorry that punctuation doesn't make sense). Though I liked Traffic too."
-- Nick A.
"it's unfinished and oddly-paced in a way quite faithful to the films it's emulating (60s Point Blank-style revenge pictures, not film noir). What's great about soderbergh's genre work is also what i guess can be frustrating about it - its aesthetics are more meticulously "studied" than usual (and it's here where his film-geekiness really kicks in, not in the arty pictures nobody sees), which means you wind up getting his homage to what's good AND bad about the source material."
-- jones
"The Limey is utter class! Stamp's performance is eccentric, yes, but utterly rivetting too! (and the conceit of using the footage from Poor Cow is worthy of David Thomson's novel Suspects)."
-- stevie t
"Probably the grooviest excavation project of the decade: take a few signature actors from decades past (Terence “Far From The Maddening Crowd” Stamp, Peter “Easy Rider” Fonda, Barry “Vanishing Point” Newman, and Lesley Ann “Choose Me” Warren), a style from Richard Lester, scenes from an old English crime flick (Poor Cow), and mix accordingly with director on the comeback trail. Fun ensues."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 8 February 2005 01:22 (twenty years ago)
Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai (107 points, 5 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004ZBVW.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"If you think it's just a gangsta/samurai/mafia style thing, consider that I have near-zero interest in any of these genres/memes, and ghost dog is one of my favorite movies. I don't know how you miss emotion in it. It's far more pervasive in Dead Man, admittedly, but it's definitely there."
-- gabbneb
"The scene where all of the old Italian mobsters are sitting around the shop and the landlord comes and gives them grief for not paying the rent was pretty funny. I liked the way he went character for character in the room in the sequence, it is a funny lineup of old tough guys."
-- earlnash
"whittaker brings a quiet dignity to this character that i can't imagine being played by any other afro-american actor. rza's theme is one of the best of the 90's too."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 8 February 2005 01:31 (twenty years ago)
Clerks (110 points, 7 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00000IQC8.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"i still give it props for being one of the first films that got me interested in 'independent cinema', i guess you could say. it's tainted moreso by his later work, i feel"
"Kevin Smith will probably be remembered quite rightly as a one-trick pony. But, at least in the beginning, that trick was one of the funniest things around. “Did he say ‘making fuck’?”"
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 8 February 2005 01:56 (twenty years ago)
― TOMBOT, Tuesday, 8 February 2005 02:26 (twenty years ago)
"As a huge Jim Jarmusch fan I'm quite sad to say that Ghost Dog is his worst film since his debut, Permanent Vacation (which, out of all his movies, Ghost Dog pays most resemblance to). Stylistically there's nothing wrong with the film; the cinematography is beautiful and the Rza's score fits the movie perfectly. The usual Jarmusch themes of alienation and chance encounters are explored, although in somewhat flat and uninspired way. But all this does not fully explain why I have such mixed feelings about the film.
Although the characters portrayed in Jarmusch's films are usually more than a little eccentric, there still is certain universality to them, making the viewer able to relate with these strange people. This is not the case with Ghost Dog. Ghost Dog, the main character, is so far off this plane that his actions and words left me cold, and I didn't care what happened to him (as I cared about the main characters of Down By Law and Dead Man, for example). This is by no means Forest Whitaker's fault; he carries out his role perfectly, but this role was written so that there's no way to relate to his character (the only exception to this being his scenes with the French-speaking ice-cream salesman). One can argue that this is a deliberate choice made by Jarmusch, but that doesn't make the film any better. Jarmusch's seems to have wanted to make a stylish crossbreed of a samurai film and a gangster film, and in this he succeeds perfectly. But, by making the protagonist a stone-cold hitman who follows the samurai ethos, he makes it impossible to understand him or to have any sympathy for him (unless the viewer himself happens to be a samurai hitman). So, at the end of the film I was left feeling just as uncaring as Ghost Dog himself felt.
Perhaps one of the reasons for my disappointment is that I'm beginning to grow tired of these lonely outsiders Jarmusch constantly displays (even though he's great at doing it). I think his next project should be less like Ghost Dog and Permanent Vacation, and more like Down by Law and Night on Earth. In those two films he explored the full scale of emotions, from alienation and loneliness to friendship and love. In Ghost Dog we have only the former two."
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 07:28 (twenty years ago)
"This is Jarmusch's millennial movie, a 21st century bookend to the 19th century revisionism of Dead Man. That film, a Zen Western shot in silvery black and white, chronicled the triumph of imperial death culture—the rape of the land and the genocidal devastation of Manifest Destiny. Ghost Dog is about the ultimate breakdown of that same system, the failure of tribalism in a world of blurry borders.
It's also a lot of fun, at least if you accept it on its own terms. Ghost Dog is a near-mythic figure, and Jarmusch doesn't bother trying to explain him beyond a single flashback. Why he lives on a rooftop with an aerie of carrier pigeons, where he received his samurai assassin training, how he rationalizes his dispassionate killing—none of it is clear. And that's okay, both because Jarmusch is working with a metaphor rather than a character and because he's found the perfect actor to embody it. Forest Whitaker has always had an unexpected grace, a sly stillness behind his lazy eye and babyfat frame. In Ghost Dog, he moves like a dancer, twirling his long-barrel pistols like swords and gliding through crowded streets as if he were actually invisible."
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 07:45 (twenty years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 08:07 (twenty years ago)
He was so great in The Crying Game, Johnny Handsome, and The Color of Money; so wasted in Phone Booth, Panic Room, and Good Morning, Vietnam; so stuck in Article 99 and Diary of a Hitman. Bird was misconceived, but that wasn't his fault. Body Snatchers was fun, but I barely remember him. Fast Times at Ridgemont High, a stereotype.
I'll probably watch Ghost Dog again with pleasure when I get around to it. But there's just something cute about Jarmusch movies that keeps me from going back...
― Pete Scholtes, Tuesday, 8 February 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)
I liked Whitaker and the music in GD, nothin else. It's a comedy?
Haven't seen all of Clerks since it showed at MoMA in '94 (pre-music soundtrack). It charmed me as nothing of his has since, but that it's considered a landmark by any criterion but commerce makes me sick.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 8 February 2005 15:37 (twenty years ago)
― Pete Scholtes, Tuesday, 8 February 2005 16:12 (twenty years ago)
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 05:20 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 05:39 (twenty years ago)
!
I kinda hope he's wrong, but who knows?
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 06:37 (twenty years ago)
― Pete Scholtes, Wednesday, 9 February 2005 06:46 (twenty years ago)
http://enjoyment.independent.co.uk/film/features/story.jsp?story=486864
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 06:55 (twenty years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 07:35 (twenty years ago)
Good news is that I should be able to do another bunch today or tomorrow. (But not this second.)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 9 February 2005 12:40 (twenty years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 9 February 2005 12:41 (twenty years ago)
Topsy-Turvy (111 points, 7 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004U40S.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 12 February 2005 00:23 (twenty years ago)
Braindead (aka Dead Alive) (114 points, 7 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00006RHU4.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"_Braindead_, AKA _Dead Alive_. The zombie flick directed by Peter Jackson. Ridiculously funny & over-the-top. (Not exactly a horror movie, I guess, but it isn't far from the _Evil Dead II_ school.)"
-- David Raposa
"Dead-Alive (its other name) truly is one of the funniest films of all time - no hyperbole there. How many other narratives deal with metaphors such as mother figure = Sumatran rat monkey??? Beware: if you do not like exorbitant amounts of gore, avoid."
-- Vic
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 12 February 2005 00:30 (twenty years ago)
Unforgiven (115 points, 8 votes)
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0790729644.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 12 February 2005 00:58 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:02 (twenty years ago)
― David Beckhouse (David Beckhouse), Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:06 (twenty years ago)
Pi (115 points, 10 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004D0C6.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"I loved pi when it first came out, partly because I didn't know whether I was supposed to be laughing or not.
pi is silly fun, but it's also maybe anti-intellectual silly fun.
But I still love pi for its acting - every single performance is great if not wonderful - and maybe even more so for its mise-en-scene: Aronofsky is showing people and places that are distinctly New York and Jewish and academic in ways that don't appear in films by other filmmakers who work in those environments. Sol's apartment in pi is maybe my favorite location in any movie."
"To drag this aside I have got to continue on Pi - I cant put my finger on why, but the film haunts and compels me in a way no other film ever ever has, I can watch it again and again, to me thats a GOOD film, but thats also a personal reaction I guess."
-- Trayce
"a film about math, obsession, the world, insanity, frustration, greed, and isolation. How the quest for the impossible can drive a person insane. Max was so close, but do far away. He was the quintessential genius who couldn't handle the pressure of his knowledge. Beautifully shot and beautifully claustrophobic. So much better than aronofsky's second effort."
-- todd swiss
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:12 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:22 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:23 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:25 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:27 (twenty years ago)
Velvet Goldmine (116 points, 7 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004CYF6.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"This is the extremely rare film (for me) which I can watch more or less ad infinitum, only getting further sucked in each time, finding more and more going on underneath the tiniest glances, subtexts, cuts, colors, smirks, glints of something so transcendental, momentary, and evanescent. Cuts to the heart of the meaning of adolescent music through the perspective of the teenager, while showing the disillusion and confusion equally encountered by the rising star. Is Brian the enigmatic and elusive one, or is Arthur the one hiding? In this sense, they are the same person, separated only by time and profession. (Which perhaps creates no further distance possible.)
I love this film so much that I nearly lost it when I received rostrum camera instruction on shooting credits from the guy who shot them for this one. (And they are well done, too.)
Treat it less like a film and more like an experience. Much seems flimsy on the surface, and the style is all over the place, but not without reason. Haynes's tightly controlled direction in Safe and Far From Heaven is evidence enough that these were deliberately pulled tropes rather than flashy stylistics."
-- Girolamo Savonarola
"I just love that movie. And I am thrilled to death the real-life Arthur is on this forum. The movie's Arthur was my favorite character, as I suspect he was for most of the people who like this film."
-- Many Coloured Halo
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:29 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:36 (twenty years ago)
The Insider (116 points, 6 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004WCM4.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"It's been quite a long time since I've watched The Insider, but the scene that I can remember most clearly demonstarting action-film style qualities is when we first see RCro: the camera trained almost literally on his shoulder, and the claustrophobia creates so much nervous energy that it might as well be an action scene. And Mann does throughout the entire movie, that beautiful man."
-- Leee
"Here's a new one: a suspense thriller of the conscience."
"a classic tale of good beating unbelievable evil. A story of ultimate sacrifice for the public good. The breakdown of the Wigand family is portrayed so brilliantly. Wigand's struggle is so real and so uplifting when he wins despite losing it all. Pacino, Crowe and Mike Wallace all shine in this greatly moving film."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:37 (twenty years ago)
The Shawshank Redemption (117 points, 6 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0000C88L7.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:43 (twenty years ago)
A pointless sneak preview clue: the next film up was the first title I ever bought on DVD. Not that that's gonna help you figure it out... ;)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:49 (twenty years ago)
― youn, Saturday, 12 February 2005 01:50 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Saturday, 12 February 2005 02:00 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Saturday, 12 February 2005 02:30 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Saturday, 12 February 2005 02:44 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Saturday, 12 February 2005 02:53 (twenty years ago)
does this imply that every commercial film is failing its objective/intent? an easily-digested verisimilitude of real life usually is the objective of the commercial film.
― Aaron A., Saturday, 12 February 2005 03:05 (twenty years ago)
(I feel bad, now, for quoting out of context.)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Saturday, 12 February 2005 03:18 (twenty years ago)
(a) the insider did so well. all i remember is being annoyed by it. BUT i guess that means that heat probably got tons of points, which i don't mind so much
(b) that the first place votes didn't start really showing up until now.
shawshank redemption is a movie i loved at the time but now make fun of myself for liking, with, i don't think, any additional viewing having occurred in the interim.
― andrew s (andrew s), Saturday, 12 February 2005 03:21 (twenty years ago)
― a banana (alanbanana), Saturday, 12 February 2005 03:23 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Saturday, 12 February 2005 06:04 (twenty years ago)
I understand this reaction -- the text of the film - some comment about man being naturally bestial and sadistic - is both regressive and insincere -- but I don't agree with it. Or I don't think it's the whole story, anyway. I mean, it's a meta-Western, and some of its debunking is pretty old hat (Hollywood's been debunking the Western for almost as long as it's been making them). But I think Eastwood's real subject isn't even the Western so much as the whole idea of heroes and the necessity of myth but also its inescapable lies. The way we tell ourselves stories about the world to make some kind of moral sense of it, even as we know the stories are fictions, our own projections. Among other things, the movie dwells specifically and uncomfortably on the actual act of killing -- what it means and what it does, not just to the person killed but to the one doing the killing. All of which is maybe too hifalutin, since Eastwood (whatever his other merits) isn't much of a deep thinker. But his questions are sincere and interesting. I can't think of another action hero who has so meticulously taken his personal mythos apart on screen, turned it over and weighed it. I think he's genuinely curious about how it all works, how he works, and what what he does means. And if he gives himself a little bit of a by at the end, that's OK by me.
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Saturday, 12 February 2005 06:09 (twenty years ago)
― Un investigador del siglo XXI (AaronHz), Saturday, 12 February 2005 06:22 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Saturday, 12 February 2005 06:27 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Saturday, 12 February 2005 06:29 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Saturday, 12 February 2005 06:42 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Saturday, 12 February 2005 06:55 (twenty years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Saturday, 12 February 2005 06:59 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Saturday, 12 February 2005 07:28 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Saturday, 12 February 2005 08:16 (twenty years ago)
White Hunter, Black Heart > Unforgiven
I voted for Topsy Turvy & Dead Alive.
I thought the Citz Kane-like stuff in VG almost sunk it (Bale was, unusually, a bore).
Russ Crowe in Insider = teenager w/ gray wig in high school play.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 12 February 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)
I voted for Topsy Turvy, too, but I saw it so long ago that I couldn't possibly make an intelligent comment on it.
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Saturday, 12 February 2005 18:13 (twenty years ago)
― Kevan (Kevan), Saturday, 12 February 2005 18:45 (twenty years ago)
Also, of course, the careful recreation of the era -- the novelty of telephones, e.g. -- was fun in itself.
As for Unforgiven and existentialism, yeah, I think it's basically an existentialist movie -- altho, again, in a deeply felt but not particularly incisive way. The key is that scene on the hill, with Clint and the kid talking about killing; I might be remembering it wrong, but I swear there's a lone leafless tree there in the background. It's all very Beckett (albeit without the jokes). Clint gives his great "It's a hell of a thing to kill a man..." line, and then the kid, still struggling for rationalizations, says, "Well, he had it coming." And Clint says, "We've all got it coming, kid." Sartre by way of Sergio Leone.
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Saturday, 12 February 2005 18:47 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Saturday, 12 February 2005 18:49 (twenty years ago)
But some of the others have moments: The whole sequence in Shawshank with Brooks getting a job at the grocery and eventually carving his name in the ceiling board at that boarding house... then Morgan Freeman's character later working at the same store, living in the same room. That was really moving/chilling. Stephen King at his best. The switch of voice-over worked really well there, too.
Gene Hackman's character was great in Unforgiven, but that one shrinks on you (especially that journalist character--yes, we get that Westerns are lies). Give me True Crime any day.
The fight between Gilbert and Sullivan in Topsy-Turvy was memorable. The Hebrew-as-math plot of pi was cool.
I don't remember anything about Velvet Goldmine.
― Pete Scholtes, Saturday, 12 February 2005 19:46 (twenty years ago)
― Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Saturday, 12 February 2005 19:54 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Saturday, 12 February 2005 20:05 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Saturday, 12 February 2005 20:06 (twenty years ago)
I should say, I remember loving the music. Great subject, too. It just felt cold to me somehow.
― Pete Scholtes, Saturday, 12 February 2005 21:27 (twenty years ago)
The Player (118 points, 9 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/0780618564.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"The Player is in some ways my fav. altman film. Funny it took metafiction to make him so damn FOCUSED."
-- Sterling Clover
― Girolamo Savonarola, Sunday, 13 February 2005 00:14 (twenty years ago)
City of the Lost Children (119 points, 7 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00000K3TS.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"I don't remember a damn thing about City of Lost Children, because I don't think I've watched it with the sound on, so I don't know if it was high-concept -- but Christ was it pretty."
-- Tep
"City of Lost Children, by being as innocent and childlike as it was, I think it came off as very powerful and raw emotionally, kinda like a 6-year-old's nightmare. Plus the story is very fresh and creative. (Honestly, I think it's the most Gilliam-ish non-Gilliam film evah, which only makes me like it more.)"
― Girolamo Savonarola, Sunday, 13 February 2005 00:26 (twenty years ago)
Hoop Dreams (124 points, 8 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00007JGCE.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Like American Dream, Hoop Dreams is about class, and the lies Americans tell their kids (and themselves) to keep on keeping on. An amazingly intimate documentary tracking two young basketball players over a period of years, from high school to college, as they are courted by basketball scouts and groomed to become hot commodities. Lots of docs followed the same pattern afterward, but few cut this close."
"Hoop dreams i love, just love - "immma keep on and on, and ima never stop" "
-- james
― Girolamo Savonarola, Sunday, 13 February 2005 00:44 (twenty years ago)
Wayne's World (125 points, 9 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B000059H23.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Wayne's World is hilarious! It's so random and absurd. The first one more so, but the second one has its moments. Like when Wayne is trying to think up an idea, and he sees a poster to Woodstock, so he says "Waynestock!" and then sees a bunch of CDs, and says that Aerosmith and Pearl Jam will be there! And then looks around and sees... an old man fashioning a canoe out of wood?
It's probably the best SNL inspired movie, which isn't saying much, but it is so by a long long run."
-- David Allen
"The Spheeris Wayne's World is perfect."
-- adam
― Girolamo Savonarola, Sunday, 13 February 2005 00:54 (twenty years ago)
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me (126 points, 7 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00005NOMP.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"I see it as an Unjustly Maligned Film, stylistically impressive and genuinely disturbing. Following Laura as she tries and fails to escape her pre-ordained doom is very affecting."
"I love the little kid with the pointy-nose mask. Is that the one with Jimmy Scott doing "Sycamore Trees"? And David Bowie going mental with a Southern accent? Classic."
-- Nordicskillz
"I was so glad the film was made, Laura Palmer was the most interesting character in the whole series, despite being absent. I don't think many pieces of art have broached the subject of how the victims of sexual violence deal with it, it's a bold story which suits its surreal structure and tone. The whole thing feels desperate and insane and mirrors Laura's psyche perfectly.
So the best scenes for me are the ones that show people desperately trying to keep up appearances in the midst of this utter insanity, the madman tailing Leland and Laura and screaming at them or Cooper's play with the CCTV.
The more I watched the film, the more I wanted Lynch to take on a Clive Barker book at some point. The little man / giant stuff fits into Barker so well, these things are neither Gods, aliens or whatever, they're just something other, so much like the beings in "Weaveworld" or "The Great and Secret Show". Lynch does "Weaveworld". Now there'd be a film. And a budget.
Um, yeah. Classic, classic, classic."
-- Lynskey
― Girolamo Savonarola, Sunday, 13 February 2005 01:02 (twenty years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Sunday, 13 February 2005 01:04 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Sunday, 13 February 2005 02:01 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 13 February 2005 19:52 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 14 February 2005 06:32 (twenty years ago)
Ratcatcher (127 points, 9 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0000AV3G7.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"This is the greatest anything ever. I just saw it. It made me cry in several places. "[Ratcatcher] is a freight train of affectations that clicks with me on the most amplified levels......" "
-- david h(0wie)
"It's excellent -- and the cinematography is so precise and efficient to be frightening. For such a bleak film it is surprisingly haunting."
-- clive
"Ratcatcher is one of the strangest films I have ever seen. The first half did not connect at all, seemed gritty social realism by numbers, slow and wholly uninvolving with a cliched plot. Then there was thje brief fantasy sequence with the mice and when we got back into the main plot (and the Dad was partially humanized) I absolutely adored it. Not only that but it made the first half all make sense and beautiful in reflection. Very, very brave opening too."
-- Pete
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 14 February 2005 12:41 (twenty years ago)
Festen (aka The Celebration) (129 points, 6 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00023P4N8.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Festen is a great film, but whether that is a triumph of Dogme principles (as opposed to just decent actors/script) is debatable. DV is essentially an actor's medium - they can move around a lot more, go off on tangents without wasting film, and the random, serendipitous nature of Dogme keeps things from getting predictable and repetitive, which is death for an actor. That's why Dogme engenders that drama club style of acting, which in turn provides the "raw emotion" that you attribute to the directors."
"Easily the best of the Dogme films, in part because it is the only one that feels as though it had to be made in that way and no other, due to an odd sense that one has stumbled across a warped family reunion video, complete with drunk relatives, bickering and the like, but on a scale enhanced x1,000. Maintaining the only part of the manifesto that remained unwritten (come on guys, let’s really shock people, yeah) whilst not compromising on believability, it is a stark portrait of dysfunction, and reveals the seamy underbelly masked by the face of respectability without re-treading old ground. Also, Thomas Vintenberg = k-hott, rowr!"
"well, I don't have much to add beyond noting that Festen is one of the most intense films I've ever witnessed. The dinner scene where the son reveals the 'family secret' is just so unexpected and tense and unsettling. It would probably rank among, oh I dunno, my favorite 20 or 30 films. Its impact is overwhelmingly due to the strong performances, and if these were indeed conjured and abetted by the Dogme / digital video methodology then I'm all for it. I don't see where the principles regarding lighting and set design make much difference, and just seem sort of silly (as is the whole idea of a manifesto)."
-- Broheems
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 14 February 2005 12:51 (twenty years ago)
The Silence of the Lambs (130 points, 7 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/6305050058.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Personally, I'm sticking with Silence.... It's multiple sequels and prequels notwithstanding, on its own it has a captivating tone and raised several intriguing questions about gender roles, voyeurism, transformation and violence. Buffallo Bill, whose demons were brought on by abuse and rejection rather than some lofty ideal of self-appointed vigilante-ism, seemed plausible (Buffalo Bill was loosely based -- like Norman Bates in Psycho and Leatherface in Texas Chainsaw Massacre -- on Ed Gein, though also with a dash of Ted Bundy).
There are myriad other elements as well. Silence also features "Goodbye Horses" (in a memorably disquieting scene)."
"he 'oh-shit-they're-at-the-wrong-house!!' moment is the most royally rippd off sequence of the past decade. unbelievable! its in everything."
-- piscesboy
"the autopsy scene, Foster and Glenn are in a funeral home in West Virginia. Totally love that scene, the details are great (including the exterior shot where you see a bunch of teens walking up outside, like they're waiting for news of their friend), and everyone in it, esp. the bit players, are great. The one old man with a flattop who is the funeral parlor owner (he's been in some David Lynch stuff, not sure of his name) is fantastic."
-- hstencil
"Silence all the way. Lecter gets all the attention, but the movie is really about Clarice; I've watched it at least a dozen times now, and am ever more impressed with the way that it reinforces and builds on its theme of a woman navigating a perilous male environment, with Buffalo Bill as the ultimate threat--a ruthless predatory male looking to conquer and consume/assume feminity itself. It just gets deeper and deeper. Among the many reasons Hannibal sucked ass is that it's about him, not her."
-- Lee G
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 14 February 2005 13:01 (twenty years ago)
The Matrix (132 points, 9 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004R80K.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 14 February 2005 13:15 (twenty years ago)
Three Colors: Blue (138 points, 5 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00005QG0I.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"This isn't really an important film, and I have trouble extricating it from Rouge and Blanc, but taken alone, this film had the biggest emotional impact on me of any film released in the '90s. Juliette Binoche is radiant and quite brave in the role, and this is my favorite example of Kieslowski behind the camera."
-- polyphonic
"Might well overrate Blue slightly 'cos of mad pash for J. Binoche, but the opening car crash sequence is up there with the car crash scene from 'Wild at Heart' for bringing home terrifying destructive power of automobile. Love the way that Kieslowski grounds his metaphysical mumbo-jumbo in everyday actions/objects - superb set-dressing and attention-to-detail - while totally preserving ineffable sense of mystery blah blah."
-- Andrew L
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 14 February 2005 13:22 (twenty years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 14 February 2005 13:23 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 14 February 2005 13:33 (twenty years ago)
― Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Monday, 14 February 2005 13:48 (twenty years ago)
It's so weird when something I posted like four years ago gets quoted on one of these polls. If I had it to write over, I'd probably say "End of Beau Travail = OMGWTFLOL!!!ROFFLE!!!"
― daria g (daria g), Monday, 14 February 2005 14:25 (twenty years ago)
― Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Monday, 14 February 2005 14:26 (twenty years ago)
I couldn't remotely buy that squishy little Welshman as a cannibal.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 February 2005 14:31 (twenty years ago)
That kinda pre-emptive nonargument work on the debate team?
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 14 February 2005 14:52 (twenty years ago)
― Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Monday, 14 February 2005 15:46 (twenty years ago)
― Pete Scholtes, Monday, 14 February 2005 15:58 (twenty years ago)
How about "soggy"? Blue is my least favorite of the three.
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Monday, 14 February 2005 16:08 (twenty years ago)
--Blue at least has Juliette Binoche, who is to sadness what Julia Roberts is to smiling or being pissed off. I wish she would hook up with a director as good as Erick Zonca (The Dreamlife of Angels).
--I felt like the energy went out of The Crying Game as soon as Forest Whitaker left the movie, and the love object was a clingy stereotype after that. But hey, it was probably good for the culture.
--Watching Jody Foster and Anthony Hopkins act the shit out of lines that really amounted to not-much (Oh my God, he knows she used to be poor!) was genuinely enjoyable, and so was the escape scene. I would rather fast-forward through the holy-shit-Bill-is-a-deviant-gay-psycho-and-now-Demme-will-feel-obliged-to-make-Philadelphia-to-make-up-for-it scenes.
--Gummo felt like a dirtier precursor to Cold Mountain's hillbillysploitation, but Lisa Carver called it authentic so what do I know.
--The Matrix was a great premise and radical political metaphor. If the climax wasn't a bust, I would have voted for it.
--Wayne's World has the "Bohemian Rhapsody" scene, a free pass to heaven for everyone involved.
--Twin Peaks has those two great set pieces--the truck freakout, and the loud club with subtitles. I saw it at the newly opened Mall of America, and it was like walking out of a David Lynch movie and into a David Lynch movie.
― Pete Scholtes, Monday, 14 February 2005 16:36 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Monday, 14 February 2005 19:46 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Monday, 14 February 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)
I want to see Ratcatcher again, too. A DVD fest should be part of the WORLD ILX FAP.
― youn, Monday, 14 February 2005 20:58 (twenty years ago)
― Pete Scholtes, Monday, 14 February 2005 21:19 (twenty years ago)
Amen. I'm glad both Clueless and WW made the list, ILX clearly isn't as elitist as some other clubs. You're also right about The Matrix, it was good until the final act, but the final act was like the Mother of All Cliches.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 14 February 2005 22:40 (twenty years ago)
Terminator 2: Judgment Day (139 points, 6 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B000050YLU.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 01:19 (twenty years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 01:20 (twenty years ago)
The Nightmare Before Christmas (139 points, 10 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004CXT5.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"The Nightmare Before Christmas may well be my favourite film of any genre ever."
-- Mark C
"Nightmare Before Christmas.
i always like the idea of an entire land about christmas, looking oddly Victorian..."
-- Jay Dee Sah Mon
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 01:26 (twenty years ago)
Babe (140 points, 9 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004D304.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Great voices, including James Cromwell as the stoic farmer, who's actually more charming than the pig."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 01:30 (twenty years ago)
The Usual Suspects (142 points, 9 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/6304493738.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"i'm so burnt out on this movie, i probably wouldn't watch it for another 10 years i reckon. at some point at least, it was an all-time fave. i'm really not sure how i feel about it now"
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 01:38 (twenty years ago)
Slacker (144 points, 8 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0002DB4ZK.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"i don't like the ending. i like the long crane shot where the guy runs over his mother. the best parts are the jfk conspiracy theory guy in the bookstore, and the old guy (the third-to-last character) speaking into his portable tape recorder while walking around early in the morning. oh and the guy who pretends to have served in the abraham lincoln brigade of course; i like how sweet and patient his daughter is."
-- Amateur(ist)
"Sure, there is a valid argument that the Austin filmed Dazed & Confused doesn’t really reflect the nature of the town, that it uses a just generic Anytown USA to tell the story. On the other hand, Slacker IS Austin—with all that implies. It’s also a snapshot of a time gone by, back when George W. Bush was a harmless Baseball man, and his daddy was the jackass president."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 01:46 (twenty years ago)
Happiness (144 points, 8 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004T8VO.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
" don't get the Solondz hate. Happiness is indulgent greatness, and Storytelling is smug and self-hating and disgusting and too-clever-by-half and perfect. What's not to like about the little worm?"
-- Harold Media
"I love this film. I know it’s wrong to. Powerful, pitch black and at times unbearable to witness, this film also makes me laugh till it hurts. Every deft, delicate absurdist touch, to the unspeaking weightlifter in Lara Flynn Boyle’s apartment, to the thick nasal breathing that Seymour-Hoffman adopts throughout has me in absolute awe. Every single minute aspect to this picture displays a chilling deliberateness that I can’t help but take my hat off to. This truly is some piece of work. Is it satire? Is it realism? As the Joker says in Batman, “I don’t know if it’s art… but I like it.” "
-- Alex K
"Happiness heartily dedicates itself to the complete opposite of Hollywood moviemaking norms -- it gives you absolutely no clues as to how to receive it, and leaves you sitting there uncomfortably, having to actually think about whether you're going to decide to find it amusing or sick or sad or cynical or what ... and it ends on such a remarkable we-mature-within-this- mess note. And so while I see the very clear connections to American Beauty in terms of subject matter, my enjoyment of Happiness came much more from seeing it as an attack on the idea that films should tell you how to feel rather than letting you work it out for yourself ... I think."
-- Nitsuh
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 01:54 (twenty years ago)
The next film shall be...something I haven't seen, and therefore can't comment on at all.
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 01:57 (twenty years ago)
part of
implicit message
in this case when John Connor realizes he's losing
― Remy (x Jeremy), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 02:03 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 02:04 (twenty years ago)
"Expertise in an area where everyone assumes they are an expert is assumed to be snobbery." -- Charles Taylor.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 03:06 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 03:23 (twenty years ago)
i still haven't seen nightmare before christmas. it never seems like a good time to watch it! happiness i've been warned off of by too many people, but who knows, someday.
― andrew s (andrew s), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 05:48 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 06:46 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 07:12 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 07:20 (twenty years ago)
― tremendoid (tremendoid), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 07:32 (twenty years ago)
And do action movies ever age gracefully? They're more prone to topicalism (everyone fighting the Russians and/or coke dealers in the 80's), fad-ism (everyone ripping off the Matrix once that became a big hit), and becoming dated due to advances in technology and FX than any other kind of movie.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 07:35 (twenty years ago)
― tremendoid (tremendoid), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 07:47 (twenty years ago)
I don't think Die Hard or Lethal Weapon or The French Connection or Bullitt or Jaws or The Empire Strikes Back have aged much at all. Even T1 has a sort of timelessness about it. But T2 just doesn't hold up for me. The special effects which were so amazing then look like shit now, and for my money, this is Arnold's first boring performance, and it a true precedent to Eraser, The Sixth Day, etc.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 08:05 (twenty years ago)
Movies like Jaws and Predator haven't aged much because they're not really "action" movies, they're suspense movies. Seeing the monster is secondary to the fear you feel in knowing what the monster might do.
The action movies whose main selling points are car chases and blowing things up are the ones that haven't aged well.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 09:01 (twenty years ago)
(the royal "you," not anyone specific here)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 09:27 (twenty years ago)
Also if Heat wins I will kill you all, jsl.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 09:47 (twenty years ago)
No Tarantino flicks have showed up yet, I sorta fear that Pulp Fiction might win, whereas Jackie Brown, his best flick, won't end up on the list at all.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 10:04 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 10:32 (twenty years ago)
But this is all that's left in T2 now that Arnie's spread the same Schtick over 200 shit movies since.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 10:35 (twenty years ago)
"Terminator 2" (using marketing abbrevs: dud) is an OK actioner made repellent by the "only shoots to wound" fucking bullshit. A cyborg was the first compassionate conservative.
>I'm glad both Clueless and WW made the list, ILX clearly isn't as elitist as some other clubs<
Clueless was a cute little movie (I didn't see WW -- 90 minutes of my life for a cute TV sketch?), but that line of proud "populism" reminds meof Michael Moore saying progressives had to watch "Friends" to connect with The People. Nobody would nominate Fight Club over thebiting satire of "Party on"?
I just saw the Demme "Manchurian Candidate" and, while no way as special as the '62 original, it seems in every way a smarter and more skillful 'thriller' tham "Lambs." Jonathan Rosenbaum on the vileness of the Lambs:
http://onfilm.chicagoreader.com/movies/capsules/11098_SILENCE_OF_THE_LAMBS
Someone once asked Stephin Merritt what his favorite recent film was, and he said "Nightmare Before Christmas with the sound off."
Would The Usual Suspects not seem utterly ridiculous on a second viewing?
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 14:25 (twenty years ago)
― Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 15:10 (twenty years ago)
'cute', yeah, things people like are 'cute', things you, man who can't spare 90 minutes, are... what? anyway, i'll take watching 'friends' over dressing up like a slob as my way of 'connecting'.
― Henry Miller, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)
Anti-elitism vs. anti-anti-elitism, fite!
For your information, I dídn't like Clueless or Wayne's World because they made me connect with "The People" (whoever they might be), I liked because they were funny and made me connect with the characters. I think there are lots and lots of films (starting from Chaplin and ending with LoTR) which appeal to all sorts of viewers without having to be labeled high-brow or low-brow.
No, MOST things people like, at least as measured by box office, are not 'cute' but horseshit.
Okay, let's tackle this argument... Here is the list of the twenty biggest world-wide box-office hits of all time:
1. Titanic (1997) 2. The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003) 3. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (2001) 4. Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (2002) 5. The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002) 6. Jurassic Park (1993)7. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (2001)8. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004) 9. Finding Nemo (2003)10. Independence Day (1996) 11. Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999) 12. The Lion King (1994)13. The Matrix Reloaded (2003) 14. Shrek 2 (2004) 15. Spider-Man 2 (2004) 16. Spider-Man (2002) 17. The Lost World: Jurassic Park (1997) 18. The Sixth Sense (1999)19. The Incredibles (2004)20. Armageddon (1998)
Out of these twenty films I'd say at least five are great (The Return of the King, Finding Nemo, Shrek 2, Spider-Man 2, The Lion King), and six are good (Titanic, the other two LoTR films, Spider-Man, The Sixth Sense, The Incredibles), so that's already the majority. Note that this list doesn't take inflation into account and therefore includes only recent films. Inflation counted for, we'd probably see such "horseshit" films as Gone With the Wind, 2001, Bambi, Casablanca, etc.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 16:12 (twenty years ago)
haha. He must mean that episode where Monica is trying to hide the fact that she goes shopping with someone other than Rachel, because Rachel would be devastated by the news that shopping, surely life's most important activity, is being shared with someone else.
The people? Jeez. Moore's been living in Manhattan too long already.
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)
Comparing non-inflation-adjusted figures is completely misleading though - a practice that the movie industry likes to encourage, because it makes the hurdle lower for them to generate "Biggest Movie Ever" hype. I read an article recently where the author wrote that treating a 1960 dollar the same as a 2000 dollar is the same as treating a dollar the same as a rupee. I.e., you would never see a list of top-grossing international movies that didn't convert to a common currency, but that's identical to a list of top-grossing domestic movies that doesn't adjust for inflation.
― o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)
Film ListGone With the Wind (1939) Star Wars (1977) The Sound of Music (1965) E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982) The Ten Commandments (1956) Titanic (1997) Jaws (1975) Doctor Zhivago (1965) The Exorcist (1973) Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937) One Hundred and One Dalmatians (1961) Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back (1980) Ben-Hur (1959) Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi (1983) The Sting (1973) Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) Jurassic Park (1993) The Graduate (1967) Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999) Fantasia (1941)
― o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 16:33 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 16:36 (twenty years ago)
"great"? Spidey 2 and ROTK were two of the duller juvenile noisefests I've seen in years. Pure distillations of popular, tech-obsessed cinematic illiteracy.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 16:40 (twenty years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 16:40 (twenty years ago)
I don't esp see the Top 20's relevance, as we were going by Clueless / Wayne's World, ie hits, not blockbusters.Anyway, it was a generalization, and I wasn't taking just about movies.
Fair enough, I was just trying to question your generalization. I'd say that for every horseshit hit film there's at least one good hit film, but I guess my tastes are wider than yours.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 16:49 (twenty years ago)
― andrew s (andrew s), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)
Terminator 2 was ruined for me by a slow and bloated ending--it was 20 minutes too long, and the sci-fi of it wasn't as interesting. But watching a few early scenes in the video store recently, I thought they held up damn well (the "your foster parents are already dead" scene was pretty great).
The idea that action shouldn't "hold up" is hooey. Just compare/contrast the '70s Assault on Precinct 13 and its state-of-the-shitburger remake. Or Duel and its immitators.
― Pete Scholtes, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:05 (twenty years ago)
When I say "hold up", I simply mean "can I still suspend disbelief when I'm watching this movie?" For T2, the answer is no. For the others I listed, the answer is yes. It's not about "making previous films irrelevant", which is specifically why I listed a bunch of movies that predate T2 or come from the same era.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:11 (twenty years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:12 (twenty years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:13 (twenty years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:14 (twenty years ago)
It's impossible to have a general discussion about film art without it becoming about grosses. SO much changed 1975-80.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:15 (twenty years ago)
― Pete Scholtes, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:15 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:16 (twenty years ago)
On a lesser webboard, this is where I'd get personal.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:18 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)
You are a figure of fun. I point and laugh.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:27 (twenty years ago)
Nah, I like you too much for that.
But seriously, Raiders is probably in my top 10 of all time. Doom wouldn't crack my top 1000.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:29 (twenty years ago)
I feel you. Saw the re-release of E.T. and aside from the idiotic digital replacement of guns with flashlights in the opening, the story has the same magic. Frog scene = one of many classics.
Temple of Doom has a great opening scene, but the comedy is very weak, and the grossout very gross. Pauline Kael was high.
― Pete Scholtes, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:31 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:43 (twenty years ago)
I mean Raiders > Terminator > T2 >>> Doom
For a change, her taste for pulp was dead on!
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:46 (twenty years ago)
Yes.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:49 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)
http://www.sensesofcinema.com/contents/01/14/light_my_fire.html
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:55 (twenty years ago)
― known vaginatarian (nickalicious), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 18:01 (twenty years ago)
why are people saying T2 is dated? I watched it a year ago and I thought it still looked great & was lots of fun.
― a banana (alanbanana), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:02 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:05 (twenty years ago)
Never, ever understood the appeal of ET - either the film or it's stupid plastic muppet charecter. Sorry.
― David Merryweather (DavidM), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:16 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:18 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:25 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 20:30 (twenty years ago)
― Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 21:06 (twenty years ago)
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 21:36 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 21:59 (twenty years ago)
You're the one who brought it up dude
― Shmool McShmool (shmuel), Tuesday, 15 February 2005 22:46 (twenty years ago)
You linked it to refute a generalization I didn't much care about one way or the other. I'd rather argue about movies than about critics.
Speaking of movies: The Empire Strikes Back was "spectacularly bad"?! (Maybe we should just hash this out in the '80s poll.)
― Pete Scholtes, Tuesday, 15 February 2005 22:59 (twenty years ago)
― Pete Scholtes, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 01:15 (twenty years ago)
Fallen Angels (146 points, 5 votes, 2 first-place votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00000ILEM.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"A film that takes place almost entirely at night in Hong Kong, apparently the loneliest city in the world after hours, where even Michelle Reis finds herself sobbing alone in a dingy apartment. A dark companion piece to Chungking Express (which had its own transcedent, romantic ending with one solitary line of dialogue), Fallen Angels nevertheless leaves one exhilirated and wishing they could be a mute, possibly insane criminal prowling the city at night serving ice cream to unwilling customers. And the final shot--a pan from two characters riding on a motorcycle emerging from a tunnel to a low-angle of Hong Kong skyscrapers above--is almost inexplicably beautiful."
-- Riot Gear!
"I can actually remember very little about the plot of this film, but the fact that so many isolated images remain burned onto my brain makes me place this so high. The cinematography is some of the most evocative I have seen, with place, atmosphere and emotion filling every single frame."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 01:52 (twenty years ago)
Three Colors: Red (147 points, 6 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00005QG0K.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"In his last directed film, one that naturally invites comparisons to Shakespeare's The Tempest, Kieslowski just as magically assumes the role of Pygmalion, creating the most perfect woman ever to grace cinema. But Valentine's beauty does not count as Kieslowski's masterstroke -- that distinction belongs to his ability to allow us to breathe life into Valentine, who herself reaches across the impossible divide of the screen separating our worlds and lights a breath in us as well."
-- Lee Wang
"Red is flawless else we'll have fisticuffs."
-- Leee Majors
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 02:02 (twenty years ago)
Okay, enjoyed the Salon piece, too. But I think he's wrong about a couple things.--Film critics don't get more editorial pressure than op-ed page writers.--Critics aren't experts in the same way foreign correspondents are. It really is a democratic art, in that the non-professional can have a highly developed film sense without being a good writer. In my opinion, for instance, that 6-year-old was right about the The Sixth Sense and the critic was probably wrong.
― Pete Scholtes, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 02:27 (twenty years ago)
Before Sunrise (152 points, 10 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00002E224.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"the truest romantic film I have ever seen. Two scenes must be mentioned because of their achingly romantic situations: the telephone scene and the scene in the listening booth. I wish that every romantic movie could be this good."
"perhaps our different takes on it have to do with our readings of the vagaries of the acting by delpy and hawke--people's reactions to acting, like acting itself, tend to be quite mysterious and difficult to explain. a lot of people hate ethan hawke, in this and other films. i've always liked him. he is perhaps a bit foppish in real life (his bad boho novel, bad boho film, etc.) but i think this quality actually contributes to the lifelikeness of the characterization in "before sunrise." indeed one of the pleasures of the film, one of the ways it seems to capture the rhythms of conversation almost uncannily, is how hawke routinely pushes a point a little too hard, raises a subject only to watch it flounce, etc. and how willing delpy is to move the conversation along nonetheless. that's an example of what i mean about form and content."
-- amateur!st
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 02:41 (twenty years ago)
― andrew s (andrew s), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 02:50 (twenty years ago)
― andrew s (andrew s), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 02:52 (twenty years ago)
Heavenly Creatures (158 points, 9 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00006ADFL.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Although Peter Jackson's film's are constantly entertaining, Heavenly Creatures is his only film that has the makings of a masterpiece."
-- Tuomas
"I saw it for the first time, and was really blown away. I'm not quite too sure why, either. I think the fact that we're presented with two quite sympathetic characters who commit a totally brutal act is one of the main appeals of the film: very few directors would take such a risk. The slow descent into madness as well just feels right. It's also carried out with the delirious glee of small girls playing as well, the scene where Pauline goes to Juliet's house for the first time and she's running around dressed as a fairy princess really encapsulates the whole feel of the movie. And then there's the ever present sense of complete doom that something really bad is going to happen. Plus it has naked Kate Winslet as well, which can't hurt. I think, above all, it resonates with me and a number of other people nowadays because it deals with the death of childhood."
-- Dom Passantino
"i think the mother's very extremely evident worn-down worry and fear-anger-love towards pauline — all the stuff her daughter can't teach herself to see — is heartbreakingly exact, as is the moment when pauline says "treat yrself", where her tenderness towards her mum very nearly reasserts itself at the next-to-last second
i also love pauline's furrowed-brow glare"
-- mark s
"It certainly is Jacksons best film - and Winslets, come to that. The scene which leads up to the moider is breathtaking, the sense of the mother's impending doom is one of the best moments of true horror of any movie I've seen."
-- DavidM
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 03:31 (twenty years ago)
Safe (163 points, 6 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0000C6658.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"...well the whole film made me really uneasy, of course. The baby shower asthma scene just creeped the fuck out of me, as I went to the bathroom right before and came back and was like "aaah!" If it's more of a critique of the sterility of modern society/suburbia - and the medical solutions (presented as cold and morbidly clinical) it offers - was Haynes also satirizing the alternative medicine methods unremittingly/in toto, and thereby articulating a position of there being no hope, escape or remedy? Where can one feel "safe" ? If that is his position, this extremely stark film becomes even bleaker, colder and more depressing in retrospect. Does it offer any solutions? Despite how her own ennui may have caused her reactions, the way the new age guru kept making the patients only blame themselves for their illnesses also bothered me, and I don't think the ending was necessarily a hopeful one, as Moore's character was not improving in health, but declining."
"There is no other film i think about so much - scenes from it pop into my head a few times a week. Its meanings are so slippery and difficult to grasp - your opinoins on the characters change with every scene: Is she getting better or worse; does she reach some kind of peace or has she been brainwashed; is her illness psychosomatic or real? is her husband unfeeling or confused or does he have some kind of empathy? i have watched the last scene maybe 10 times and every time i do i feel something completely different - she's gone mad - she's at peace - she's dying...; is the acting realistic or stagey? do people talk this way now or do they just talk like that on television: Do they learn it from television and now use it in life?
I love the way Julianne Moore looks directly at the screen/ mirror /YOU - and says she loves you - is she telling you as the viewer or herself as a reflection? Nothing else Todd haynes or julianne Moore have made has approached this power. There is nothing like it. Most movies, Even other intelligent films, signal to you what kind of emotion you should be going through this one leaves everything hanging. i keep going back to it."
-- jed
"Overrated, but still effectively creepy, and with Haynes muse starring in the most un-actress-like role of any '90s movie."
"One of my top 10 movies of all time. I agree with fletrejet, I think the point was Haynes presents the situations with complete ambiguity and lets the viewers bring their own perspectives to the film. Usually a filmmaker will attempt to direct you towards a conclusion, but Haynes plays this one like real life. We're presented with a situation and asked to make our own decision with the facts presented to us. I thought the cult was handled extremely well, there's some evidence that it's explotative of the members yet at the same time there's evidence that it's quite helpful to many of them as well. Can we deny their happiness and improved lives just because they might be being manipulated? Perhaps this manipulation is part of the cure?
I also love the ending, how he brings us to this changing point in the characters' lives and asks us to make the decision along with the characters. We can see the difficult choice and play out the final scene in many ways, and all we are left with is our personal resolution and the evidence that supports it. This film is fantastic for group viewing and debate."
-- zaxxon25
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 03:39 (twenty years ago)
The Ice Storm (165 points, 8 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004CY5W.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Everyone in this film did their best work in this film, including the director. A great story, and one that is burned on my brain."
"I never thought ang lee had such an even, unjudgemental, beautiful, and complicated film as this in him. though I don't know too much abt his other films. as I said on the other thread, everyone is v. v. good in it too - tobey maguire auditioning his version of quaint and goofy fr his future peter parker; sigourney weaver so reasonable and cold; christina ricci her usual dispassionate edged with adolescent curiosity; elijah wood 'sexual'; even kevin "a fish called wanda" klein (sp?) can't ruin it.) pretty bleak, however."
-- cºzen
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 03:44 (twenty years ago)
Glengarry Glen Ross (170 points, 9 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004S8J4.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Quotable Mamet on full, self-loathing throttle, and with the perfect sausage party cast. Alec Baldwin scene = classic."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 03:55 (twenty years ago)
"I like sharp, snappy scripts and heavyweight actors attempting to act each other off the screen. This film has both in spades. Al Pacino eats up the screen in what could be, for me, his finest role to date. Like when he tells the cops “I did it…”, or his insult to Spacey “you stoopid fuckin’ cunt” you have to love him for it. And what about Baldwin’s monologue? If you’ve ever worked in sales or anything close, you’ll be blown away by his ‘motivational’ speech: “Third prize is you’re fired”. Almost perfectly acted by a dream team cast – I never tire of watching this movie."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 03:59 (twenty years ago)
Lone Star (171 points, 9 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00002E20R.01.LZZZZZZZ.gif
"Sayles' apotheosis, with a touching, transcendent, quiet final scene not played as a revelation, just as life. "It's always heartwarming to see a prejudice defeated by a deeper prejudice." "
-- Bill Weber
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 04:04 (twenty years ago)
Waiting for Guffman (174 points, 10 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00005LC5D.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Last night, I went to see Big Fish, which was as bad as I thought it would be. So, in an effort to get the bad taste out of our mouths, my best friend and I watched Guffman for like the zillionth time. Let me add that I'm not someone who watches movies over and over: there's probably only 20 or so movies that I've seen more than once, and under 10 that I've seen more than twice. But Guffman NEVER fails to make me laugh. At this point, it's like total comfort food for me."
-- jaymc
"infinintely rewatchable."
"I second the notion that Waiting For Guffman (and Spinal Tap too) only gets funnier with every viewing. and I hate to watch most movies more than once."
-- Anthony Miccio
"Oh my goodness, Guffman... The "Stool Boom" song, My Dinner with Andre action figures... "'Ello! 'Ow are 'ou?" "He sings, he dances, he directs. There's only one other person who can do that, and that's Barbara Streisand." I love it."
-- Prude
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 04:10 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 04:11 (twenty years ago)
Miller's Crossing (174 points, 7 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00008RWW5.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"The great thing about Miller's Crossing is that no matter how many times I see it, I never remember the plot."
-- Tonight at ten
"I have espoused the virtues of this masterpiece before on the ilx boards, but suffice to say, this film is everything I want in a picture – humane, dark, witty, clever, allegorical, complex, loaded with consequence, and littered with tiny details, unique undertones, and double meanings that I am still deciphering each time I watch it. Its commentary upon such universal themes as love, betrayal, trust, friendship and ethics is at once intricate, poignant, darkly funny and, beneath the comic-book gangster veneer, above all, human. Beautifully shot, beautifully lit, beautifully scripted and beautifully acted, I can’t fault this picture. It enraptures me each time I watch it. One scene to convince you of its genius? Check out Albert Finney blowing away a couple of goons who invade his house, then chasing them down the street with a ‘Thompson’ while smoking a cigar, set to the strains of Danny Boy blaring out from a battered-in gramophone."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 04:15 (twenty years ago)
Anyway, the discussion was about ILX being non-elitist, which puts us all in the position of being the same self-proclaimed experts that Taylor was talking about. That's all.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 05:43 (twenty years ago)
#67 L.A. Confidential#59 Pi (1 first)#44 Nightmare Before Christmas (1 first)#37 Before Sunrise#30 Waiting for Guffman (1 first)
― andrew s (andrew s), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 05:49 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 05:52 (twenty years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 06:32 (twenty years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 06:33 (twenty years ago)
― Pete Scholtes, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 06:56 (twenty years ago)
― youn, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 07:04 (twenty years ago)
― youn, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 07:05 (twenty years ago)
even kevin "a fish called wanda" klein (sp?) can't ruin it
I don't see your point, I think Kevin Kline is excellent in most of his films, including The Ice Storm. I'd say he's a much better actor than he's given credit for, also when it comes to drama roles. Ditto for Ethan Hawke.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 07:25 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (x Jeremy), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 07:25 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 07:34 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (hstencil tastes like bubble gum) (x Jeremy), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 07:49 (twenty years ago)
Pretty much all that have ever been attempted.
The last 10 or so picks, save Lone Star and Glengarry (which was perfect on stage), recall that "Manhattan" phrase Academy of the Overrated, Gen Y style.
The whole cult-base final section of "Safe" just doesn't work for me. A friend who claims it's the best film of the '90s says it took the fourth or fifth viewing for him to realize it's a comedy. That's too many for me.
Miller's Crossing lovers, rent all the Warners Gangster Collection. Now. Then repent.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 14:52 (twenty years ago)
So you guys loooove hit-and-miss TV-sketch style comedies, huh? With two-dimensional characters by design?
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 14:57 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 15:00 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 15:14 (twenty years ago)
39-30 were really great, but hey, what do I know, I guess I'm just a founding member of the Gen-Y Academy of the Overrated.
Miller's Crossing is hands down the best Coen film.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)
Fallen Angels should be number one! But I think it's going to be Goodfellas, which isn't a bad choice.
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:28 (twenty years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:41 (twenty years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:44 (twenty years ago)
Fallen Angels was by far my least favorite Wong, but I can't recall much about it.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:52 (twenty years ago)
Delicatessen (186 points, 9 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0000634BZ.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 17:54 (twenty years ago)
Toy Story (190 points, 14 votes)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:03 (twenty years ago)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004YMRX.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)
― Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)
Toy Story is so good, though I prefer Toy Story II, one of the few movies ever that almost made me cry. But yeah, Toy Story is awesome too.
― n/a (Nick A.), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:07 (twenty years ago)
Boogie Nights (192 points, 12 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004D35S.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Enjoyable, if overlong, conscious widescreen epic. In a rise-and-fall-of, look-at-specific-era-of-American-culture sorta way. Again, surrogate families/parents, by way of "Nashville". The world of porno gone "GoodFellas". The guys I went to film school with at the time claimed that the final scene even TIMED OUT to the same length as DeNiro's closing mirror monologue in "Raging Bull". "
-- absolute skittles
"That part in Boogie Nights where all the different scenes are juxtaposed against each other and there's that absurdly minimalist soundtrack and Don Cheadle's character is getting fucked up (not in the drug sense though) = powerful shit mang."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:20 (twenty years ago)
xpost: damn, I thought Boogie Nights would be higher
― Mike O. (Mike Ouderkirk), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:23 (twenty years ago)
Jackie Brown (196 points, 14 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00005LDBG.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"One long coffee-break of a movie that's better the second time, once you know how little the plot has in store. Tarantino completely rewrote the book, but that's apparently what it took to better capture the lazy mood of other, better Elmore Leonard novels (this is Leonard's favorite adaptation, he says). The characters measure each other carefully, weigh each situation, consider their options, and play each other, killing, kissing, or seeking out a chemical fix in some dark bar with classic soul on the jukebox. Samuel L. Jackson at his most relaxed nearly blows the Pam Grier/Robert Forster team off the screen (I'm still convinced better actors could have made the movie sing more), but there's a quiet and real chemistry in the Grier/Forster non-couple, and even the sunniest mall scenes can't shake the weird scariness of that Chris Tucker/Meters' "Sissy Strut" sequence (I'm being vague for anyone who hasn't seen this). Part of me wishes the entire movie would take place with Bridgette Fonda in that living room."
"All the actors have room to breathe, think, react, gather their defenses, change strategy. It's the closest thing to a John Sayles movie you'll ever see from QT. Which is a recommendation in my book."
-- Tracer Hand
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:28 (twenty years ago)
― Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:31 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 18:57 (twenty years ago)
Jackie Brown gets overrated for the valuable human element provided by Grier & Forster (and the only substantial de Niro performance of the last dozen years?), nearly neutralized by Samuel J's blaxploitation joke-on-legs.
I could've flipped a coin on Delicatessen vs City of Lost Children, but I haven't seen either since their debut so they missed the cut.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 19:24 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 19:38 (twenty years ago)
The first time I saw Boogie Nights I thought it was great. It's a film of massively diminishing returns, though, moreso when you realize PT Anderson doesn't have an original thought in his head, and he just grafts stories onto a particular template in order to remake some of the films he wishes he had made in the first place. I don't mind thievery in genre films, but when a guy is allegedly making "thoughtful, deep, emotional pictures", but in actuality is just making shallow cover versions of better films, I call foul.
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 20:23 (twenty years ago)
(haha, that just goes to show how damned LONG that scene was)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 16 February 2005 20:35 (twenty years ago)
― Pete Scholtes, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 22:03 (twenty years ago)
Eyes Wide Shut (196 points, 11 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00005OA7J.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"DV is right - when you read the source material, it's surprising just how faithful EWS is to Schnitzler's slight, surreal comedy of manners. The tokenistic updating. and relocation to an obviously constructed 'New York', only adds to the film's detached and dreamlike air - nothing in it feels 'right' or 'real'. And I think Kubrick is gently mocking Cruise's status as number one sex symbol by getting him to play a bit of a bumbling idiot who stumbles from one encounter to another, seemingly oblivious to other people's desire for him. DV is also on the money w/ the David Lynch comparison - according to Lynch, Kubrick once nominated 'Eraserhead' as his fave film, and you can see the things that they have in common - exquisitely composed images, sloooow pacing, an air of menace and mystery, a refusal to give the viewer 'obvious' answers. Even after watching EWS a couple of times, I'd be hard-pressed to articulate what the film is 'saying' exactly - be careful of what you wish for? That the idea of infidelity is better than the actuality? That desire has nothing to do with 'relationships'? Or that dull marriages need a bit of spicing up?"
"I have much love for Barry Lyndon and Eyes Wide Shut, flawed as they may be; in those flicks Kubrick did try to build characters, and not just say something about the human condition. The ending of Eyes Wide Shut showed Kubrick more humane than he'd been since Paths of Glory."
"Just re-watched Eyes Wide Shut, and the pre-lude to the orgy (with the Romanian chanting and Nick Nightingale playing keyboard blindfolded) is nothing short of masterful. It was so good I wanted to cry.
I sort of figured that would be Kubrick's thinking behind the naval officer scenes, and they do sit better on subsequent viewings, I just hate the grainy blue film it's shot with. Music's good though."
-- David Steans
"As with the next film on my list, the criticisms leveled at Kubrick's "real" final film seemed to me to stem more than anything else from expectations of what it "should've been" preventing reviewers and audiences from admiring it for what it was--to my tastes, one of Kubrick's finest films."
-- Josh Timmermann
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 23:48 (twenty years ago)
Ed Wood (200 points, 13 votes)
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B0000VD04M.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Burton's funniest film, Johnny Depp's intoxicating breakout, Martin Landau's Oscar: a movie about visionaries believing in themselves so hard, and with so little apparent effort, that being silly never occurred to them."
"A most frustratingly good director, because lately he has gone through mostly odd missteps. Not QUITE a mass-market David Lynch or anything, though he has the knack of handling big budget projects more than Lynch does. Still, most everyone I know seems to have a Burton film they adore above all others and for me that's Ed Wood, which becomes my favorite film of the nineties the more time goes on..."
-- Ned Raggett
"One of the ironies of modern film, that such a terrific, hilarious, and often touching film could be made about one of the worst filmmakers of all time."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 16 February 2005 23:56 (twenty years ago)
Magnolia (201 points, 10 votes, 2 first-place votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004WCLC.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 17 February 2005 00:04 (twenty years ago)
― t0dd swiss, Thursday, 17 February 2005 00:11 (twenty years ago)
Barton Fink (201 points, 11 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00008RH3J.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 17 February 2005 00:11 (twenty years ago)
South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut (203 points, 13 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004I9Q1.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Thursday, 17 February 2005 00:17 (twenty years ago)
"Magnolia" has one of the worst endings of any movie I have ever seen. And by "ending", I mean the last 45 minutes or so (but especially the last 10).
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 17 February 2005 00:35 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 17 February 2005 00:41 (twenty years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Thursday, 17 February 2005 00:51 (twenty years ago)
― Mike O. (Mike Ouderkirk), Thursday, 17 February 2005 00:56 (twenty years ago)
I know I ask this question at most polls, but how short do you think the list will have to get before it will be easy to call the remaining films? Pretty damn short is my guess.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 17 February 2005 01:00 (twenty years ago)
Anderson doesn't really know what to do with kids, but that's hardly a unique failing among directors. It just seems weird for a movie about child abuse.
― Pete Scholtes, Thursday, 17 February 2005 01:09 (twenty years ago)
Courtney Love reviews Boogie Nights:
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/_/id/5940046
― Pete Scholtes, Thursday, 17 February 2005 01:38 (twenty years ago)
― Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Thursday, 17 February 2005 01:51 (twenty years ago)
and these ones have a chance:breaking the wavesfast, cheap and out of controlexoticacity of hopecontactdazed and confusedfarewell my concubinethe fifth elementhudsucker proxyiron giantjoe vs. the volcanolife is sweetmr. deathnakedoffice spacethe pianoprincess mononokethe thin red linetitanic
― a banana (alanbanana), Thursday, 17 February 2005 02:02 (twenty years ago)
― peepee (peepee), Thursday, 17 February 2005 02:20 (twenty years ago)
― peepee (peepee), Thursday, 17 February 2005 02:21 (twenty years ago)
Anyway: Magnolia is good and maybe even great, because of its big goofy heart. Talk about a movie not afraid to seem stupid. But it still mostly avoids embarrassment (I even like the frogs, I'm afraid). Favorite bits: the reporter interviewing Tom Cruise (as much for her as him -- she's so unruffled and sure of herself); the first encounter between John C. Reilly and the cokehead girl, when he goes to her apartment to tell her to turn down the stereo; the painful scene in the bar with William Macy and the waspy old queen (and Supertramp).
Barton Fink...I like the first half fine, but it goes seriously off the rails. They're shooting for a Lynchy thing, and they don't bring it off. It's their "art film" pastiche, but it's like they couldn't decide whether to send up art films or make one, and got stuck in between. John Goodman's good.
South Park is near fucking genius. It would be in my curriculum for any study of the Clinton era.
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 17 February 2005 02:32 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (hstencil tastes like bubble gum) (x Jeremy), Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:15 (twenty years ago)
Actually, I think they decided to do both - and that they managed to pull this off is part of what makes the film for me. John Goodman is good in it, yes. As are pretty much everyone else, from Turturro to Judy Davis, to John Mahoney in the sozzled Faulkner role, to Michael Lerner as the fascist studio boss. I still think it's the best Coen Bros movie, and it's probably my favorite of the 90s.
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:22 (twenty years ago)
Best part of the movie. "My memory's getting womanish on me, all lying and deceitful."
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:29 (twenty years ago)
My first reaction was to share your skepticism, but when I went back and checked my ballot, I found South Park listed, of all places, at #21. So I guess I have to agree with the poll result in its unfathomable wisdom.
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:30 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:32 (twenty years ago)
Actually, I have no idea.
― Shmool McShmool (shmuel), Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:34 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (hstencil tastes like bubble gum) (x Jeremy), Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:35 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:36 (twenty years ago)
A chance:Ghost in the Shell
― Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:47 (twenty years ago)
― Pete Scholtes, Thursday, 17 February 2005 03:48 (twenty years ago)
― andrew s (andrew s), Thursday, 17 February 2005 04:32 (twenty years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Thursday, 17 February 2005 05:39 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Thursday, 17 February 2005 06:00 (twenty years ago)
Er, in what way is South Park reactionary? I'm not a big fan of Trey Parker's and Matt Stone's libertarian politics, but in this particular film the way they deal with censorship and with how protecting the children is used as an excuse for everything is spot on. I think South Park deserves to be number 21, it's one of the best comedy/musical films of thew nineties. I think the musical part of it is often ignored, even though Trey Parker writes damn catchy scores and builds up great musical scenes; this has been evident ever since Cannibal! The Musical, his first film. Also, I love the way the movie builds upon the characters of the TV series and somehow makes them into something more touching than mere satirical vessels; Satan as the ignored lover is great, and when Kenny finally takes his hood off, before sacrificing himself to save the world, and says "Goodbye!", without mumbling, that almost brought a tear to my eye.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 17 February 2005 08:43 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (the wannabe culture theorist) (x Jeremy), Thursday, 17 February 2005 09:11 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 17 February 2005 09:20 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (the only true currency in this bankrupt world is shared beween two people , Thursday, 17 February 2005 09:22 (twenty years ago)
― Dan I. (Dan I.), Thursday, 17 February 2005 10:58 (twenty years ago)
(i like the South Park movie, #21, sure why not)
― Alienus Quam Reproba (blueski), Thursday, 17 February 2005 11:19 (twenty years ago)
Because so very few people belong to either category, certainly not the electors of the US.
― NRQ, Thursday, 17 February 2005 11:22 (twenty years ago)
Err, no. They were self-imposed only under threat of being outside-imposed. This was about a year after Columbine, and "think of the children!" was at its height. That's why South Park is not just great because it rude and funny, but because it was a brave film to make.
And it's also (morally) good. Normally, when I hear talk of how satirical comedy has to have a "heart", I reach for my revolver, but the fact that the film is really sweet most of the way through is the thing I didn't expect.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 17 February 2005 11:29 (twenty years ago)
breaking the wavesdazed and confusedfarewell my concubinethe fifth elementhudsucker proxyiron giantnakedoffice spacethe pianoprincess mononokethe thin red line
(I don't think the people who voted for the seventy films we've seen so far will have much time for Titanic, though I could be wrong).
So that's 11-goes-into-8. If you put a gun to my head and said "three of these aren't going to be in the top 100 films of the 90s", I'd pick Naked, The Piano and, er, maybe The Fifth Element. There is a lot of hate for the Hudsucker Proxy, but the high placing of the other Coen Bros. films gives me hope.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 17 February 2005 11:41 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 17 February 2005 11:46 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 17 February 2005 11:48 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 17 February 2005 11:56 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 17 February 2005 12:09 (twenty years ago)
― peepee (peepee), Thursday, 17 February 2005 13:00 (twenty years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 17 February 2005 14:17 (twenty years ago)
You guys really fall for these (Hollywood) directors who are marketed as visionaries in Entertainment Weekly, don'tcha? As I wait for Hou Hsiao-hsien or Andre Techine to appear. And Fight Club was "a mess" or "wobbly" compared to some of this half-baked silliness?
I liked Magnolia a whole lot more when it was called Short Cuts.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 February 2005 14:17 (twenty years ago)
I wish Trainspotting was still to come, but I suspect it's too British.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 17 February 2005 14:28 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 February 2005 14:31 (twenty years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Thursday, 17 February 2005 14:51 (twenty years ago)
Jocelyn, that saddens me. You wouldn't be any fun at the opera, either!
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Thursday, 17 February 2005 16:06 (twenty years ago)
That wasn't a comment about the level of my retardedness, was it?
― peepee (peepee), Thursday, 17 February 2005 16:41 (twenty years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 17 February 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 February 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)
― peepee (peepee), Thursday, 17 February 2005 16:50 (twenty years ago)
You really fall for these directors who are marketed as visionaries in the Village Voice and Chicago Reader, don'tcha?
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 17 February 2005 17:33 (twenty years ago)
(And literally, NO. Hoberman loved Dogville, one of my most loathed films in years, and JR is on the Million $ Baby bandwagon.)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 February 2005 17:40 (twenty years ago)
― n/a (Nick A.), Thursday, 17 February 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)
Yes, like Kassovitz, Neil Jordan, Woody, Mike Leigh, Hirokazu, Robert Duvall, Kiarostami, Cronenberg, Terry Gilliam, Lisa Heinzerling, Vincent Gallo, Hal Hartley, Wong, Korine, Scorsese, Altman, Almodovar, Peter Hewitt, Moodysson, Besson, Woo, Lynch, Chan, Denis, Verhoeven, Lyne, Tykwer, Jarmusch, Kevin Smith, Peter Jackson, pre-Hollywood Aronofsky, Spheeris, Haynes, Jeunet & Caro, Steve James, Lynne Ramsay, Vinterberg, Kieslowski, Solondz, Linklater, Sayles, James Foley, Trey and Matt Stone and Kubrick.
Or were you talking about the other ~20 films on the list, 1/3 of which are by 3 directors?
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 17 February 2005 18:10 (twenty years ago)
OTM
― jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Thursday, 17 February 2005 18:13 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 17 February 2005 18:15 (twenty years ago)
-- NRQ (blocke...), February 17th, 2005 3:22 AM.
I don't for a second believe that they (the electors of the US gov) ARE far-rightists or puritanically religious. I think any argument to claim so is misinformed, and deserves a better argument than this one: no.
---- At the time the movie was released ('99) the much-belabored 'censorship laws' oft-referenced in criticism of the film were largely self-imposed fuzzy guidelines by the Hollywood industry.
-- Andrew Farrell (afarrel...), February 17th, 2005 3:29
Brave, how? Being brave would involve some real risk-taking. Saying fuck, or featuring a poorly-animated puppet of Saddam singing musical numbers isn't brave, it's silly fun -- if you like that kind of thing. Pushing the 'rude' button is the equiv. of poking a sibling in the eye to see what happens; the reaction's predictable but the intensity isn't. Moreover, I can't imagine sitting through a film that didn't have a heart. Movies = move us. A purely cerebral experience is unsatisfying, and I'm glad South Park was able to affect you. It wasn't able to affect me at all, however, and in being so distant, so reactionary in its politics, and so ... dull ... in my eyes belongs nowhere on a list of 'top films' of the anything.
Also - Dan - we agree on Magnolia.
― Remy (holds dual citizenship) (x Jeremy), Thursday, 17 February 2005 18:28 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 17 February 2005 18:56 (twenty years ago)
This is not true and, even if it was, bringing it up in an argument about South Park strikes me as being wilfully obtuse about what's happening in the movie.
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 February 2005 19:01 (twenty years ago)
Optimally, yes. Sorry it didn't move you. That seems to be all your argument boils down to, though.
Man, if you can't appreciate a toe-tapping song about using dirty words, I can't help you.
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Thursday, 17 February 2005 19:04 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 February 2005 19:04 (twenty years ago)
And how am I willfully obtuse about what's happening in the movie? Admittedly, I haven't seen the flick since it was in theatres ... but I don't remember it doing anything but mucking around on the (safe) edge of artifically and conservatively-set taste-lines. I'll be the first to acknowledge that I don't remember it well, but I can't imagine I'd miss a huge layer of satire or incisive commentary.
Also: Though I once did, I no longer give a shit as to your opinion of me, Dan, especially since I realize exactly how insultingly poor it is. But I'd appreciate if you could keep conversations (and I do enjoy discussing this shit with you) from veering toward passive digs at my person. Insinuating my 'willful obtuseness' or a 'loathe'-ful redefinition of the word 'reactionary' does nothing to continue a conversation except make me feel like I shouldn't bother arguing lest I be insulted. As I've said before - if you've got shit with me, bring it into the open. I can take it.
― Remy (breaks this shit down for y'all) (x Jeremy), Thursday, 17 February 2005 19:47 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 February 2005 19:48 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 February 2005 19:55 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:03 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (water, oil, pouring) (x Jeremy), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:04 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (hstencil tastes like bubble gum) (x Jeremy), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:08 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:09 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:10 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:17 (twenty years ago)
What the fuck is it about expressing opinions about movies? My wife and her ex-bestfriend are now not even on speaking terms, largely because of a difference of opinions about films. Anyone else sense the over-blownness of it all?
― peepee (peepee), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:19 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:21 (twenty years ago)
― peepee (peepee), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:23 (twenty years ago)
Sorry Morb, but your theory of film criticism seems to be a CYA of poo-pooing everything popular & not giving your approval until the a Voice critic ok's it first.
― jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:25 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:27 (twenty years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:29 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:38 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (hstencil tastes like bubble gum) (x Jeremy), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:40 (twenty years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:44 (twenty years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:45 (twenty years ago)
― n/a (Nick A.), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:46 (twenty years ago)
(xpost "Se7en" was great, though! And "The Sixth Sense" would have been great had I not seen the ending first.)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:51 (twenty years ago)
Being nihilistically funny is not the same as being cerebral, and there's nothing wrong with that kind of humour (which was all over the South Park tv series), I was just expressing a pleasant surprise that the movie wasn't like that, and that that approach worked.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 17 February 2005 20:55 (twenty years ago)
Well, Christopher Nolan's not the first person to think "OMG our entire sense of self is based on our memories!", but that's the best example in film (or other media) of such that I can think of. Insight I don't particularly want, but well- or forcefully-argued cases are grand.
I thought the narrative was great and my considerable enjoyment of it is almost exclusively on that level
The actual answer to the question "Who set him up?" is brilliant, and I definitely got my money's worth there, in purely cerebral terms. I got a little more as well, because I cared about Guy Pearse's character.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 17 February 2005 21:12 (twenty years ago)
I didn't say anything about blockbusters--it just seems from your responses that you associate yourself more with the hipster critics who dismiss anything popular as pretentious or "been done", yet wholeheartedly embrace the newest Spielberg picture for some unexplained uniqueness or "humanity".
Andrew summed it up best-- Jay - it's not enough that the right people love a movie, the right people have to hate it too, you dig?
That's enough from me--I'm not even supposed to be posting to this thing...
― jay blanchard (jay blanchard), Thursday, 17 February 2005 21:18 (twenty years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 17 February 2005 23:34 (twenty years ago)
I like talking/arguing about movies, but there's a difference between that and you-tasteless-morons insults.
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 17 February 2005 23:40 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 17 February 2005 23:41 (twenty years ago)
I don't read EW.
The Sixth Sense is a rather right-wing-framed movie, no?
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 17 February 2005 23:43 (twenty years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Thursday, 17 February 2005 23:45 (twenty years ago)
Kubrick is a Hollywood director? Parker & Stone? Gallo? I suppose Verhoeven and Lyne could be even if they're not Americans. Does anyone like any of these people principally because they are "marketed as visionaries" in EW?
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 17 February 2005 23:49 (twenty years ago)
Here are the comments I submitted with my ballot on the five movies I nominated, which don't have a shot in hell at making it. You are allowed to comment on my comments, but I am also allowed, entitled and downright required to ignore the shit out of your comments on my comments.
Bitter Moon -- Polanski's sick coup is that, while everyone's busy looking with disdain at Peter Coyote's liver-spotted tongue do cartwheels inside his quivering, puckered maw, he's also slyly letting Hugh Grant's limited scope as an actor ("No, Hugh, I think this scene works well with you doing the befuddlement thing.") and the consequent untenability of moral outrage tip the balance back in favor of corruption.
Death Becomes Her -- I'm not above a catfight***, and any movie where Meryl Streep and Goldie Hawn voice the following exchange -- "I've raised more than a few eyebrows in my day, you FORMER FATSO!" "That's because you could SHAKE and RAISE your hips faster than ANYONE!" -- certainly earns its place next to Mommie Dearest and Desperate Living in the pantheon of movies your gay best friend will continue to annoy you with quotes from until you're both old and gray.
Red to Kill -- What I wrote in my film journal upon seeing this jawdropper: "Something tells me I should be more offended by this: a movie about a muscle-bound human tornado who, due to a childhood trauma, turns into The Incredible Rapist whenever he sees a woman wearing red (which means, naturally, that he's on roughly his 369,511th rape at the start of this film... right?). That he sweats buckets of what I assume is a colloidal cocktail of testosterone and KY is a nice touch, but here's the great part: he works at a retard shelter and rapes his 'patients' until one of the retards chastizes herself in the shower as 'dirty, dirty' and then proceeds to slash pubic hair (and flesh) away from her dirty, retarded vagina. I'd be more likely to keep my glee for this lurid shit to myself if I weren't pretty sure this is supposed to be a satire of the distressingly commonplace HK rape film subgenre."
Titanic -- I loved watching the action jocks, who had spent the previous decade slapping each other on their backs and paying lip service to Cameron's brand of "feminism" (i.e. forcing Linda Hamilton and Sigourney Weaver to suck it up and learn how do do chin-ups) suddenly go apeshit at the perceived sellout found within Kate Winslet's gorgeously-curved, indolently feminine form and the fact that, as I heard one meathead lamenting on the way out of the employee screening I attended, "that boat should've caught FIRE on the way down!" I know I more-or-less railed against genre dilettantism in the nominations thread, but Titanic has become that retrospective anomaly: the blockbuster no one apparently wants to take the blame for canonizing.
Uncle Sam -- Stuff like Three Kings (which I don't particularly like), Small Soldiers and even Starship Troopers (which I do) don't feel particularly transgressive as satires because it's pretty clear in all three cases that the director's main point is that war is unfortunate. Wow, I'm impressed; you can really clear the bases with THAT sort of statement, can't you? Uncle Sam (script by the always awesome Larry Cohen) has the edge as far as I'm concerned for tackling a far juicier topic: the sort of lazy jingoism and self-righteous, unquestioning heroic image the home front puts on the face of the fallen soldier. Unlike the vague smug sense of superiority the other three films I mentioned engender, Uncle Sam puts passive, overseas observation to shame.
*** = [ed. note: unless it's a catfight on ILX pitting stupid hipster movie A against stupid hipster movie B]
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Thursday, 17 February 2005 23:57 (twenty years ago)
― Chris 'The Nuts' V (Chris V), Friday, 18 February 2005 00:00 (twenty years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Friday, 18 February 2005 00:02 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 18 February 2005 00:04 (twenty years ago)
-- gabbneb (gabbne...), February 17th, 2005.
wtf?
― latebloomer: HE WHOM DUELS THE DRAFGON IN ENDLESS DANCE (latebloomer), Friday, 18 February 2005 00:04 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 18 February 2005 00:06 (twenty years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Friday, 18 February 2005 00:08 (twenty years ago)
― Chris 'The Nuts' V (Chris V), Friday, 18 February 2005 00:09 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 18 February 2005 00:26 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 18 February 2005 01:39 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 18 February 2005 01:41 (twenty years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 18 February 2005 01:42 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (might have just food-poisoned himself) (x Jeremy), Friday, 18 February 2005 02:31 (twenty years ago)
Great: La Haine, Clueless, All About My Mother, Fucking Åmål, The Straight Story, Beau travail, Pi, Festen, Before Sunrise, Heavenly Creatures, The Ice Storm, Lone Star, Delicatessen, South Park.
Good: Twelve Monkeys, Buffalo 66, Out of Sight, Leon, L.A. Confidential, Run Lola Run, The Insider, The Shawshank Redemption, Wayne's World, The Silence of the Lambs, The Nightmare Before Christmas, The Usual Suspects, Happiness, Glengarry Glen Ross, Waiting for Guffman, Toy Story, Jackie Brown, Eyes Wide Shut, Ed Wood, Magnolia.
Okay: After Life, Barton Fink, Ghost Dog, Clerks, Miller's Crossing, Boogie Nights, Braindead, Starship Troopers.
Mediocre: Naked Lunch, Happy Together, Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey, Jacob's Ladder, City of the Lost Children, Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me, The Matrix, Terminator 2.
Bad: The Blair Witch Project
Haven't seen: the rest.
The list has been pretty good so far, Blair Witch is the only major du in it. I won't probably see my top three films of the nineties though, that is, Human Resources, Lost Highway (why wasn't it nominated?), and Farewell My Concubine.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 18 February 2005 12:55 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 18 February 2005 13:00 (twenty years ago)
― Huey (Huey), Friday, 18 February 2005 13:08 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 18 February 2005 13:11 (twenty years ago)
― Huey (Huey), Friday, 18 February 2005 13:14 (twenty years ago)
― Huey (Huey), Friday, 18 February 2005 13:15 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 18 February 2005 13:18 (twenty years ago)
Grrr.
― Huey (Huey), Friday, 18 February 2005 13:29 (twenty years ago)
― Huey (Huey), Friday, 18 February 2005 13:31 (twenty years ago)
― David Merryweather (DavidM), Friday, 18 February 2005 14:06 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (wants to be Tuomas) (x Jeremy), Friday, 18 February 2005 15:11 (twenty years ago)
Great: La Haine, All About My Mother, Fucking Åmål, The Straight Story, Beau travail, Pi, Festen, Before Sunrise, Heavenly Creatures, The Ice Storm, Lone Star, Delicatessen, Terminator 2, Happy Together, Short Cuts.
Good: Twelve Monkeys, Leon, L.A. Confidential, The Insider, The Shawshank Redemption, Wayne's World, The Silence of the Lambs, The Nightmare Before Christmas, Glengarry Glen Ross, Waiting for Guffman, Toy Story, Jackie Brown, Eyes Wide Shut, Ed Wood.
Okay: After Life, Barton Fink, Ghost Dog, Clerks, Miller's Crossing, Boogie Nights, Braindead, Starship Troopers, Buffalo 66, Out of Sight,
Mediocre: Naked Lunch, Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey, Jacob's Ladder, City of the Lost Children, Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me, The Matrix, Magnolia.
Bad: The Blair Witch Project, Clueless, South Park, Run Lola Run, The Usual Suspects, Happiness.
Haven't seen: the rest. (Remy -- I might have but I can't be bothered to look).
― Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Friday, 18 February 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 18 February 2005 15:44 (twenty years ago)
Great: Taste of Cherry, Blue, Eyes Wide Shut, Ghost Dog
Good: Beau Travail, Slacker, Topsy-Turvy, Clerks, Amateur, The Shawshank Redemption, Fallen Angels, Secrets and Lies, Lone Star, Before Sunrise
So Bad It's Good: Pi
Okay but points for ambition: The Straight Story, Happiness, Jacob's Ladder
Okay: Unforgiven, Ed Wood, Clueless, Glengarry Glen Ross, Short Cuts, Barton Fink
Mediocre: The Ice Storm, Heavenly Creatures
Bad: The Blair Witch Project, The Usual Suspects, The Silence of the Lambs
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 18 February 2005 16:05 (twenty years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Friday, 18 February 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)
― Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Friday, 18 February 2005 20:02 (twenty years ago)
The Robert Aldrich/Clifford Odets film the Coens chewed on to shit out Barton Fink:
http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B00006FDAT.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 18 February 2005 20:25 (twenty years ago)
Office Space (205 points, 14 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0000BZNIU.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Damn it feels good to be a gangsta."
"c for its spot-on depiction of management, ESPECIALLY THOSE BOSSES who preface every verb in every directive they give you with the hateful phrase 'go ahead and.' also the montage set to ... was it 'pimpin ain't easy'? i forget. d for deus ex machina at end, lazy plot development, etc.
but still, man, the satire of office life was so perfectly pitched, sometimes watching that movie was like watching not a comedy, but a surveillance tape."
-- maura
"Oh, we could sit here all day (in a productive fashion) and hash out our favorite scenes - the O face, sex w/ Lumberg, the fax machine beatdown, Peter gutting the fish on computer paper, Milton getting no cake love from the office birthday party, Peter meeting up w/ Joanna for the 1st time ("You know, I never really liked paying bills.")
Oh, so many moments."
"Well, finally saw it tonight at a screening that does these one-off revivals on Wednesday at a local theater for cheap (best idea the place has had in years). Packed to the damned gills, clearly there is a cult for it.
I...liked it. I enjoyed it. I'll take what everyone's said about it getting better with further viewings in mind, and Root did a fine job indeed, I wouldn't mind just a film about his character but at the same time he was in the end probably most effective just as a perfectly recurring secondary figure. Pete's point way, way up top about it being sketches rather a movie as such applies strongly.
I'm sure many here will offer up thoughts that will prove me wrong, but I suspect, just as strongly, that a lot of the identification with the film has to do with whatever you've experienced in your working world, and in my case while everyone was cracking up as the jokes came through I was mostly smiling instead of belly laughing, I was bemused rather than feeling a shock of recognition -- in my post-college life, my two regular 'jobs' as such were teaching writing with an extremely sympathetic program supervisor, a role which I incredibly enjoyed despite its fluid and time-consuming nature, and my library job, which while its own form of bureaucratic oddballness has never caused me to rage, and where my supervisors have almost always been great folks or at the least harmless and easy to work around. If anything I've been incredibly appreciative of its just-right nature for me, a combination of problem-solving and relaxation that if anything has improved with time, and which increasingly I've been able to use to get some definite improvements and changes done over these years. In a way, this film's a bit like Buffy, something which a lot of people clearly adore but which doesn't fully resonate with me, doesn't feel applicable or say anything new or striking to me -- though the movie was hardly a jeremiad, I thought its tritest moments were the variants of 'work sucks' in the dialogue.
But enough of that -- yeah, pretty good, but I'm not thinking I'll be a cultist. Underrated character: Lawrence. Underrated plot element: the meta-references to Superman III."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 19 February 2005 00:12 (twenty years ago)
Three Kings (206 points, 13 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004W4FX.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"I hate war films. I avoid war films. I couldn't get through the first 15 minutes of Saving Private Ryan.
But several people recommended this film to me despite my aversion to war films, saying that it was more than that. So I saw it last week and HOLY SHIT. I really really liked it. It's so intense, and very depressing in ways, but made me laugh too.
I liked the portrayal of the characters, how there was complexity and humanity to all of them, in a way that doesn't seem to happen often enough in Hollywood movies."
-- JuliaA
"Hands-down, one of the best films of the 90's. It's all-star cast might mislead one into thinking this is just another Hollywood shoot-em-up. It is really one of the smartest, unconventional, and most-humane war films of recent memory."
-- Anthony
"I thought it was fucking brilliant. I loved the washed out look of the cinematography, the weirdness of the situations they got themselves into, the fascinating (no idea if accurate) portrayal of the Iraqi soldiers' attitudes. Favourite scene - the one where the guy tortures Mark Wahlberg for America's treatment of Michael Jackson."
-- Nick
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 19 February 2005 00:23 (twenty years ago)
Naked (208 points, 12 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004COJ2.02.LZZZZZZZ.gif
"I still have no idea what Thewlis is screaming at the end. Still the Male Savage perf of the decade."
"In my college halls last year lived a 28 yr old student nurse called Johnny from Manchester. He was insane, and me and the geezers woz convinced that he was living his life like the Johnny from Naked. He laughed like a fucked hyena."
-- sean f
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 19 February 2005 00:33 (twenty years ago)
Trainspotting (209 points, 14 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B000092W9R.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 19 February 2005 00:38 (twenty years ago)
Dead Man (227 points, 10 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004Z4WX.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"A curious picture, flawed in fact, but like most great pieces of art, I like the flawed one’s best – keeps them rooted in humility, keeps them relevant. The genius Neil Young soundtrack doesn’t hurt either."
"Pitch-perfect parable appropriately adrift as it accurately assays every emotion within its reach. Poignantly dispassionate(?); gorgeous; hilarious; one of those film experiences that begins in your aching head a few minutes after the closing credits. Best movie of the 90's."
-- tremendoid
"Is it not a frequently beautiful film punctuated by overlong sub-Monty Python "wacky" dialogue scenes? And that's one of my favourite movies!"
-- @d@ml
"I haven't thought enough about what Dead Man says to a contemporary world, if anything. But if you keep it in it's time period (which requires some suspension of disbelief), it's very effective as a very sad (and occasionally funny) movie."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 19 February 2005 00:46 (twenty years ago)
Chungking Express (227 points, 9 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0001XLVZO.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Any ADD-afflicted individuals who are worried about the deliberate pace of In the Mood for Love might prefer to try Chungking Express; funny and sweet, but a lot faster-moving, and the lovers actually touch each other and shit."
-- Stephen X
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 19 February 2005 00:50 (twenty years ago)
Sorry to tease this out, but you'll have to wait at least a little while longer for the rest...
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 19 February 2005 00:51 (twenty years ago)
good: blair witch project, naked lunch, buffalo 66, leon, l.a. confidential, run lola run, topsy turvy, city of lost children, the matrix, nightmare before christmas, before sunrise, toy story, ed wood, barton fink, south park: BLU, three kings,
okay/not my thing: sweet and lowdown, clueless, twelve monkeys, gattaca, bogus journey, out of sight, bottle rocket, hard boiled, the straight story, schindler's list, the butcher boy, the limey, ghost dog, the insider, shawshank redemption, hoop dreams, wayne's world, festen, blue, babe, red, glengarry glen ross, boogie nights, magnolia (the non-boring version of short cuts), chungking express (its first half flat out sucks)
bad: casino, the apostle, short cuts, jacob's ladder, braindead, pi, silence of the lambs, the usual suspects, the ice storm, office space,
can't remember: fucking amal, trainspotting, secrets and lies
why oh god why: clerks
on my to-watch list: the rest (except gummo)
― a banana (alanbanana), Saturday, 19 February 2005 04:13 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 19 February 2005 09:00 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 19 February 2005 09:04 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 19 February 2005 09:12 (twenty years ago)
Great: Heavenly Creatures, The Blair Witch Project, Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me, Jackie Brown, Barton Fink, Out of Sight, Boogie Nights, The Nightmare Before Christmas.
Good: Office Space, All About My Mother, Heat, Leon, Ed Wood, The Straight Story, La Haine, Twelve Monkeys, Toy Story, Glengarry Glen Ross, The Silence of the Lambs, The Matrix, Starship Troopers.
Okay: Clueless, City of the Lost Children, Terminator 2, Waiting for Guffman, The Usual Suspects, L.A. Confidential, Magnolia, Three Kings, Fucking Åmål, Pi, South Park, The Insider, The Shawshank Redemption, Braindead, The Ice Storm, Trainspotting.
Bad: Naked, Dead Man, Eyes Wide Shut, Festen, Slacker, Topsy-Turvy, Clerks, Secrets and Lies, Before Sunrise, Wayne's World, Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey, Happiness, Jacob's Ladder.
― David Merryweather (DavidM), Saturday, 19 February 2005 11:10 (twenty years ago)
― Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Saturday, 19 February 2005 13:26 (twenty years ago)
So mersh.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 19 February 2005 16:09 (twenty years ago)
I think it's more objective to show that even heroin users can have their ups and downs, instead of turning into the living dead immediately after their first hit. Hasn't it been shown that the sort of scare stories where one try leads you straight to Hell can have an opposite effect than intended, when people do try drugs and realize that the movies weren't exactly telling the truth?
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Saturday, 19 February 2005 16:29 (twenty years ago)
The Iron Giant (228 points, 10 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B000777UFO.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Antiwar film of the decade? Let's hope Brad Bird uses his "Incredible" leverage to hit this note again. Harry Connick's beatnik is the finest animated sexpot since Jessica Rabbit."
"This is an emotional pick, but fuck you if you don't like it."
"I didn't know The Iron Giant had so many fans besides me. The funniest thing about it is that the Iron Giant himself has been voiced by Vin Diesel."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 19 February 2005 17:50 (twenty years ago)
Reservoir Dogs (234 points, 13 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0001XLWBM.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"A great movie about being an actor, by a director who seems not quite tough enough to be one himself. Sample reaction from a female friend of a friend to the blessed profanity: "Stop the movie. Are they going to be talking like this through the whole movie? They are? Good, then I need a cigarette while watching this. You got a light? Good." "
" I re-watched Reservoir Dogs recently and am still struck by his 1) really interesting dedication to Jim Thompson-style fractured narrative and 2) his sense of composition (the torture scene). I bought the Reservoir Dogs DVD and I must say that many of the qualities that made QT so talked-about when he was coming up still gleam very brightly: quick, effortless dialogue; composition, as I noted above; his sense of timing above all. It's as though he's located where the artistic impulse lay hidden in, say, Die Hard."
-- J0hn Darn1elle
"how can someone not like reservoir dogs? pulp fiction I can see (although I liked it too, but have no desire to see it again). Reservoir Dogs is so well acted and Tim Roth's character so sympathetic. That move fucked me up the first time I saw it."
-- anthony kyle monday
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 19 February 2005 17:57 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Saturday, 19 February 2005 18:05 (twenty years ago)
Heat (244 points, 14 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004CZQV.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"There are L.A. geographical gaffes, the ending is forcast, and the DeNiro/Pacino faceoff is a bust (are they even in the same room?). But the action, dialogue (egregious Pacino-isms and all), and support performances keep me coming back for more. Realistically sidelined women, awesomely amoral men, great music in that bank scene, and DeNiro looking straight into an infrared lens at night = shit-cool."
"OK, so it’s not exactly deep, but ahhhhh – Pacino, De Niro, Kilmer, Sizemore, Studi, Noonan, Voight, Mann and Spinotti all doing the right thing; an action sequence to end all action sequences and for once, and unusually for what is essentially an action movie, a strong supporting cast of women, led by Diane Venora, who is excellent as Pacino’s exasperated but empowered wife. The two male leads, Pacino in particular, are just fuckin’ awesome in this movie, I think for both of them, it might be their last great role before slipping into self-parody (well, Pacino rocks The Insider, but I’m struggling to think of a decent De Niro movie post Heat). Pacino throughout, is on the edge of that kind of comic book thing he does nowadays, but I think it works – his character here is by turns funny, scary, plausible, fallible and ultimately, I think, likeable. De Niro’s performance is more subtle, colder, understated, but full of neat detail and nuance; freeze the tape in the right place when he’s in the café talking to Eady for the first time and marvel at the shit-eating smile he drops into the mix. Pacino though, gets all the great lines: “cos she’s got a GREAT ASS… and you got your head, all the way up it,” “don’t waste my motherfucking time,” and perhaps the best: “I'm angry. I'm very angry, Ralph. You know, you can ball my wife if she wants you to. You can lounge around here on her sofa, in her ex-husband's dead-tech, post-modernistic bullshit house if you want to. But you do not get to watch my fucking television set!” Ah, you have to love the guy for what he gets away with in this movie.
The film is meticulous in its detail and development, down to the smallest intricacies – such as De Niro’s starched shirt collars that he wears throughout the picture – a hangover habit from his character’s days in the can. I have also read that such was Mann’s attention detail during filming, when they first shot the bank robbery scene, they used the positions of the bank’s actual security cameras to capture the heist, for a more authentic feel. Unfortunately, they planned the robbery too well, and Kilmer did not show up on any of the rushes so they had to re-shoot the whole sequence making sure they captured Kilmer. For me, it’s dedication and attention like this that pays off in movie making and helps make Heat a modern classic, and brings me back the picture time and again."
"A weird thing I love about that movie: In the big heist-gone-wrong scene at the end, the automatic fire sounds like you imagine it should--big, flat, booming staccato echoing around all the canyons formed by those corporate towers--instead of like gunfights in movies usually sound. There are a lot of silly things about that film, Pacino's performance chief among them, but it did sweat the details.
Perhaps Pacino was going for the poetry with that turn. Consider his reading of "Cause she's got a GRRREAT ASSSSS . . . andyou'vegotyourheadallthewayUPit!" "
"i'd like to read an interview where mann talks about technology and aesthetics. specifically, i'm interested in his use of the widescreen frame (which he obviously prefers, his beginnings in TV notwithstanding). nowadays the habit is still to shoot with both the widescreen and TV ratios in mind, so that directors are discouraged from introducing important elements in the extremes of the frame. but i get the feeling, from memories of his films, that mann doesn't quite subscribe to this. heat in particular uses the whole widescreen space pretty aggressively IIRC.
i think this film has much more classical restraint than it gets credit for, despite all the longeurs and pacino's very unclassical overacting (which i like here, usually, and anyway i think pacino has a clause built into his contract that allows him to scream at least twice in every film). in a way it seems like one of the few true inheritors of something like "anatomy of a murder," one of those long, intricate, extremely ambitious and relentlessly objective (which is to say morally complex) preminger films."
"A poem about Los Angeles in winter, a poem on the spiritual emptiness of modern life, a poem on the awful beauty of violence, the relativity of good and evil, the (im)possibility of redemption through friendship and loyalty, the incompatibility of love and work when only work is obsessive......plus the greatest gunfight in cinema since the Wild Bunch (or at least the Long Riders), DeNiro's best work in years, Pacino's improvisatory hamminess actually suiting his character for once,Val Kilmer looking like he means it, some great music and supeb direction.....best american film of the 1990s....?
The beauty and poetry in Heat comes in the small moments - the tapestry of it, if you like.The way Pacino skips away from Diane Venora after their final, resigned and candid conversation - he is free of her and excited by it,almost like a little boy. Free of her, able to indulge his obsession.DeNiro's fatalistic speech to Amy Brenneman wherein he tries to persuade her to come with him. If there is a reaon he returns to the hotel I think it is because he senses he is doomed - "whatever time you get is luck" he says - and cannot keep his pessimism out of even this conversation with her. Then the transcendent moment of white light in the car afterward and its being swallowed by blackness as he accepts - to some extent - his fate.The shared crease of pain and loss crossing the faces of Val Kilmer and Ashley Judd after they are forced to turn away from one another.
And Heat does look like a Bruckheimer film (literally), in a way. Mann basically invented the formula many Bruckheimer films are predicated upon. The heavy use of filters, the constant gloss, the obsession with lighting, the existential heroes - compare Bad Boys to Miami Vice and the similarities are frightening....
There are also parallels with Peckinpah in the romantic idealisation of the lonely man, the absense of humour, the expertise with the depiction of violence. .."
-- David Nolan
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 19 February 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)
The Thin Red Line (290 points, 13 votes, 2 first-place votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004TBT2.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Best war movie ever made. One that showed how the earth was rended as well as the people. 10 000 000 times better then that jngoistic monstrosity Saving Private Ryan. Terrence Malick is so unbelivably good as a film maker"
-- anthony
"great great great great great great great
as a sensory experience first and foremost
I've been listening to this film, not watching it (for the most part), this evening. It's clear to me that the soundtrack—music, dialogue, effects and ambient sounds—was through-composed as it moves along like a piece of music itself. It has a pulse. From the sounds of boots hitting soil as soldiers rush by, to the punctuations of explosions, to the whispering of a soft wind through grass, to the clank of guns against belts, to the offscreen narration, to the dialogue that registers like monologues dovetailing into naturalistic exchanges. The original score, combined with bursts of Ives and Faure (and the portion of the score which cites--and glides into-- the lovely native Polynesian tune sung toward the beginning of the film), is varied and powerful as well without transcending the incidental music category.
I can't think of any other modern film with this magnificent a soundtrack save for a few late films by Godard (especially Hail Mary). This sort of thing--a through-composed, contrapuntal soundtrack/image relationship (in a non-musical)--is found in some of the early sound films, like M and Dovzhenko's Ivan. It's rare to find it nowadays.
One of the great joys of film watching is seeing a particular work over and over and slowly discovering the tissue that binds it together. Or realizing how deliberate, how carefully calibrated are the constituent elements: sound, image, screenplay. The Thin Red Line continually reveals to me new beauties, new pleasures, and remains absolutely moving, even startling.
One thing that multitrack recording, digital recording and editing, etc. allows is an attention to the specific quality of individual sounds and their integration into the pattern of sounds that even M or Ozu, in his most fastidious moments, couldn't achieve.
Modern film criticism seems woefully lacking in critical writing about sound. Can anyone please direct me to books and articles about sound in cinema? I'm especially interested in manuals for sound designers that have some more theoretical value as well, but also maybe some formal analysis of how sound works in motion pictures. Also some work on soundtrack music too. I know this should be an entirely different thread. . . .
Also wonderful are the stylized depictions of death (the mother on her deathbed, the angel, the room without a roof) and lovemaking (around 1 hour 25 minutes in; "I drink you...now").
... OK to tone down the hyperbole a bit (and I know that while nothing "sells" a movie better that unrestrained enthusiasm, little sells it worse than seeming hyperbole) I guess there are weaker moments in the soundtrack here. Better to say that long stretches--the majority--of the soundtrack seem fluid, through-composed to me. Also the "main" battle scene--where the Americans assault the Japanese encampment--has some extraordinary montage, some shots lasting only a few frames and thus the shock registers almost subconsciously. The little moments of horrible, almost abstract beauty (bayonets and stricken soldiers framed like silhouettes against the pale sky, the face of a Japanese soldier, half-shielded in bamboo, appearing in a flash from inside a foxhole) only add to the overall terrifying reality, in which I believe we're asked to be just as frightened for the surrounded Japanese as the invading Americans. The sequences before and after further attest to this--as David Walsh points out, this is one of the very few WWII films which actually seems to weigh the cost of--not just what war can do to ourselves--but what it does to the enemy. Masumura's Red Angel is perhaps more forceful in its revisionism, but not then again they lost the war."
"or some reason unknown even to me, I once sat and wrote out, longhand, every line of the narration. Then I sent it to a friend. It's a very long poem.
The line: "Oh my friend of all those shining years" is one of the most sorrowful heartbreakers ever.
Yes, the cameos are a bit jarring (Travolta with a ridiculous mustache!), but the lyricism -- visual, auditory, verbal -- wins me over every time. It's basically a gorgeous classic, and even the dull parts have touches that can engage you -- the tall grasses moving in the wind and silent soldiers creep agonizingly slowly forward.
Penn and Nolte are massive in this film, as is the guy who plays Witt (the latter to the former: "Do you ever get lonely" Penn: "Only around people"). And isn't that Ben Chaplin who gets the letter from home? His stunned nausea in that moment is wrenching.
Um, yeah, classic."
-- David A.
"An elegy, a dream, a hallucination? I don’t quite know what happened to this film but somewhere along the line, I think Malick lost sight of what it was supposed to be. No matter, the piece benefits from this wild, wandering phrasing. It comes on like the fractured smog and sparks from a flash flare, and Malick purposely puts you right next to the blood and the grime. The lush greens from the grass and foliage brush right up against the lens, and as the film meanders from murder to glimpses of a mundane life back home, you’re made to feel like a dazed soldier, mixing it in amongst the other men as they confront death with each passing minute."
"The colors are so lush, simply watching the film makes my eyes water, and I imagine that the tears in my eyes are green-reflecting droplets that whisper melancholy poetry as they fall through the air. "
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 19 February 2005 18:16 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Saturday, 19 February 2005 19:29 (twenty years ago)
I knew a simple soldier boy Who grinned at life in empty joy, Slept soundly through the lonesome dark, And whistled early with the lark.
In winter trenches, cowed and glum, With crumps and lice and lack of rum, He put a bullet through his brain. No one spoke of him again.
You smug-faced crowds with kindling eye Who cheer when soldier lads march by, Sneak home and pray you'll never know The hell where youth and laughter go.
― Remy (Siegfried Sassoon) (x Jeremy), Saturday, 19 February 2005 19:32 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Saturday, 19 February 2005 19:37 (twenty years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 19 February 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)
All war movies are "shallow." What's to be said?
Amst OTM about the soundtrack. The last time it was on cable, I sat in the next room on the computer while the movie roared and whispered away in the background, and it still shook me up.
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Saturday, 19 February 2005 23:50 (twenty years ago)
(Yay for Iron Giant placing!)
― David Merryweather (DavidM), Sunday, 20 February 2005 02:39 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 20 February 2005 21:18 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Sunday, 20 February 2005 21:26 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Sunday, 20 February 2005 21:35 (twenty years ago)
Also, you might want to rewatch the movie, because by my count, the good guys kill exactly zero people in the movie. Incredibles definitely has a more cavalier attitude about dealing with death (i.e. the hilarious "No Capes!" sequence, the "No Capes!" final joke, Mr. Incredible hiding behind a corpse, etc.), but when faced with death, Mr. Incredible mourns in a very real and human way.
Iron Giant is very much meant for children, but with truths that resonate for all. Incredibles seemed to me directed toward a more adult crowd, but still preached similar values to IG. It isn't an emotional film or a poetic one, but it is incredibly fun and vibrant.
I would also add that the portence and poetry of Iron Giant had less to do with Brad Bird and more to do with Ted Hughes.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Monday, 21 February 2005 06:19 (twenty years ago)
I know, that is why I said "get killed", not "kill". It has for long been an animated feature tradition that the protagonists never kill anyone (probably because the kids shouldn't be taught that killing is morally acceptable), but instead the bad guys accidentally fall into their death, or something falls on them, or they get caught inside their own deathtrap, etc. Almost always it's just the main baddie that dies though, at the end of the movie. In The Incredibles, however, several minions of the bad guy get killed, and while the protagonists aren't strictly responsible for that, it happens as a direct result of their action. But my argument goes deeper than that: what's the point of putting "bad guys" into children's films in the first place? Is it necessary to teach the children that the world is divided into the good and the bad, and that even though killing itself is wrong it's okay if the bad guy dies in a freaky accident? A lot of children's books, as well as Japanese children's animation (think of Miyazaki), work perfectly well without portraying the world in such Manichean terms. In Disney films like Pocahontas, Mulan and Tarzan the bad guys are totally unnecessary; the main plot would work perfectly fine without them, and yet they're included because someone has to die at the end, otherwise it wouldn't be a happy ending. This is why Lilo & Stitch was such a refreshing change for Disney - in that film even those we'd thought were the baddies turn out to be not so bad after all.
Yes, I know that Iron Giant has a "bad guy" as well, but it could be argued that he's misjudged rather than evil. And at least he serves a function to the story, and doesn't die at the end.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 21 February 2005 16:05 (twenty years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Monday, 21 February 2005 17:03 (twenty years ago)
Which lives do the Incredibles inadvertently end? I can't think of any. The Incredibles definitely knock out a lot of guards, but I don't think any of them are actually killed. This is still violence, true.
As for Miyazaki, does the masked faced spirit not eat several bathhouse patrons in Spirited Away? I also remember some fight scenes in Princess Mononoke, but perhaps I'm remembering incorrectly.
It would be great if Syndrome had proven to be redeemable, but it was also fun to play within the themes of comic books. At some level, cartoons are not just for children, and I wouldn't suggest that Ghost in a Shell or Akira should be made safe for children. Incredibles is a more adult cartoon, and parents should be cognizant of that when they take their children. That doesn't make it inferior to IG, just different.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Monday, 21 February 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)
― Jimmy Mod Has Returned With Spices And Silks (ModJ), Monday, 21 February 2005 17:15 (twenty years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Monday, 21 February 2005 17:22 (twenty years ago)
― Dan I., Monday, 21 February 2005 19:30 (twenty years ago)
In the chase scenes in the woods at least a couple of the vehicles carrying Syndrome's men explode, and since they aren't shown jumping off, I think it's implied they die. There might be some similar scenes later on, my memory fails.
My main point wasn't that Miyazaki is totally non-violent, but that in his films, as in a lot of anime, no one is really evil. Even the motivations of the antagonists, like Lady Eboshi in Mononoke or Yubaba in Spirited Away, are explained, and the films don't end with "good" triumphing over "evil", rather than with the opposing parties reaching an agreement (of sort).
At some level, cartoons are not just for children, and I wouldn't suggest that Ghost in a Shell or Akira should be made safe for children.
I agree; I was talking about children's cartoons only, non-children's animation like Akira or Ghost in the Shell are a different thing. It's interesting to notice though, that what I said above applies to these two films as well - there aren't true bad guys in them either, just conlicting motives. I think this has to do with a deeper difference between Eastern and Western philosophy; the theme of good vs. evil probably has more resonance in the Christian West than in the Shintoist/Buddhist Japan.
Also, I know cartoons aren't for children only, but children are still their main audience, and I'd wish people put consideration into what sort of messages they relay.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 21 February 2005 19:39 (twenty years ago)
― Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Monday, 21 February 2005 19:50 (twenty years ago)
He throws them up (alive, no less) later.
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 21 February 2005 22:00 (twenty years ago)
Crumb (323 points, 15 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00013YQGU.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Terry was absolutely in the right place at the right time with this documentary. This, Hoop Dreams and Fast Cheap... seemed like a collective turning point in documentary making. The line between director and subject blurred, as did the line between documentary and fiction. Crumb is as unreliable a subject as you can get, and yet the glimpses of who he is buried under the facade of lechery is fascinating and very sad. His family is even worse. I suppose only a life this tragic could yield the bitter (but funny!) result that was his art."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 21 February 2005 22:10 (twenty years ago)
This is true, but I don't think this applies just to cartoons or to cartoons more certainly than any other type of picture. Furthermore -- there's a great deal of animation currently being produced with NO eye toward youth audience. The fact that traditional & pixar-style animation is INCREDIBLY expensive to produce makes distribution/production houses feel their subjects need to be widely accessible, and fairly universal in content (whether this is true or not is another argument), and so the films tend to be largely inoffensive. This inoffensiveness (and certain unfortunate storytelling conventions) marks animation as juvenile, though the content / theme / story of the individual pieces might not. cf. Fantstic Planet, Bill Plimpton, etc.
― Remy (cel memory) (x Jeremy), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:10 (twenty years ago)
Dazed and Confused (332 points, 16 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00029RTAI.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"1976 as a Big Star song come to life, with the laughter that seems to come easy in Austinites."
"Dazed & Confused is the best thing Linklater has done. It has everything great about Linklater - his sense of place and time, a rambling structure without being too spread out, perfectly realized characters and their groupings/interactions - minus the affectation. It's just so damn smooth. (Also, I think it makes a strong argument that sometimes being forced to accept commercial norms can be good for a more arty director. Having to work in teen/stoner norms rather than completely subvert the genre makes it stronger.)"
-- milozauckerman
"i really love it. i guess i vicariously relive high-school each time i watch this. i fit probably somewhere between mitch and the nerdy blonde guy, except i never seem to hook up with a hottie at the end of the night :("
"I was the 8th grader, it was New Jersey not Texas, and everything else was the same."
"Another film without a lot of technical or historical importance, but this film captures my high school experience a lot better than any other film I've seen, and is probably second to The 400 Blows as an impressionistic statement on what it is to be young. This movie is funny and breezy, and the dramatic tensions in the film are minimal. That's not always a bad thing."
"Now mandatory viewing for all high schoolers, in order to remind them that there was a time when American cars were cool, hazing was encouraged, sex was safe, and rock’n’roll was dangerous. The kids will get older, but the film will stay the same age."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 21 February 2005 22:24 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:31 (twenty years ago)
Election (346 points, 18 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B0000505GZ.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"[Favorite Funny Scenes:] the speeches given by the candidates during the assembly, especially paul's speech read directly from his crumbled up piece of notebook paper about how he lead the football team to victory in the fourth quarter. and then the whole thing culminating with tammy telling everyone to vote for her, or better yet, don't vote at all.
and the simple scene where paul is in his spanish class and the teacher tells him in spanish that he's to report to the principals office."
-- metfigga
"Yeah, that scene is pretty great, especially the kid with cerebral palsy who's running for vice president unopposed! What hilarious and observant details."
-- Eric H.
"Election' is a real classic, and now looks like the best US film of that mini golden age of 98-00 (Three Kings, Fight Club, Rushmore, etc)."
-- Strachey
"I really don’t get Reese Witherspoon. Sure, she’s sorta cute, but how can she be “America’s Sweetheart” when she’s at her best with hateful characters like Tracy Flick?"
"most comedy writers either lean on crudeness too heavily or stay away from it entirely. payne is somewhere in the middle of that spectrum, which is very rare, and i like that about him too. i'm thinking specifically of the scene in election where matthew broderick's character frantically splashes water on his balls before a motel tryst. there are a few scenes as unexpected as that in sideways, and they're just as funny."
-- mark p
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 21 February 2005 22:35 (twenty years ago)
― The Obligatory Sourpuss (Begs2Differ), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:36 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:38 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:41 (twenty years ago)
Being John Malkovich (417 points, 20 votes, 4 first-place votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004U8OC.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Charlie Kaufman scripts are never quite as good as you want them to be for the simple reason that movies, like most stories, operate best from inside the heart, and Kaufman's anti-romances are really only concerned with your mind. But before the plot kicks in, and before things start making "sense," Jonze sets up a brilliant showcase for the plot's built-in disorientation, and Catherine Keener's Stanwyck-on-steroids turn."
"And Being John Malkovich I downright loved. I thought that movie was underrated even by a lot of people who liked it -- it got a lot of, "Oh, it's so zany, so fresh, so FUN" reviews, when I actually thought it was an intensely philosophical and deeply considered film. I think that movie grapples with some things (about the nature of existence and identity, the perennial struggle for transcendence via the Other, blah blah blah) that don't turn up in many films this side of Bergman. And it's funnier than Bergman."
-- JesseFox
"Being John Malkovich was even better, and I think in both cases the PoMo games are not empty flourishes but ways that make very good sense to me as ways of addressing some genuinely interesting subjects."
-- Martin Skidmore
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 21 February 2005 22:44 (twenty years ago)
Haha, x-post.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:45 (twenty years ago)
― andrew s (andrew s), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:47 (twenty years ago)
― andrew s (andrew s), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:50 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:50 (twenty years ago)
Fargo (429 points, 23 votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00008AWT1.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"It's simply a great, classic tragedy with tremendous uber-subtle performances, beautiful cinematography, beautiful writing... it's just one of those films that I could watch forever. I do agree that it falls outside the rest of the Coen Bros. canon, but for all the right reasons."
-- Joshua Houk
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 21 February 2005 22:50 (twenty years ago)
"I went to see Being John Malkovich with high expectations, but came out of the theater somewhat let down. The film has a great premise, good actors and it's full of intelligent twists. Even bigger my disappointment when, after the first half, the film loses it's thematic integrity, turning into a conceptual merry-go-round without a proper focus on anything.
As I said, the first half of Being John Malkovich is ingenious. Although based on an extraordinary premise, the film doesn't just indulge in it, but instead uses it to explore themes such as identity, manipulation and celebrity. Strangely, much of this is thrown into the trashcan after we hear the explanation why there is a portal into Malkovich's mind (in my opinion, there was no need for explanation, and the one given was stupid and incoherent). After that, the film is nothing more than a battle of who controls John Malkovich; it suffers the exact fate it kept avoiding for its first half. The last 30 minutes of the film are nothing more than an intellectual masturbation with no direction nor a deeper meaning. The ending, albeit quirky, is unsatisfying and does little to save the movie.
A minor letdown in the film is John Cusack. His literary lines and over-the-top acting would work well if Being John Malkovich were just a comedy. But when he tries to play the tragic character and display inner conflicts he simply isn't credible. This is hardly Cusack's fault, though; the dialogue, the characters and their emotional reactions are not crafted in a believable way (the only exception being John Malkovich himself). Whether this is deliberate or not, it ruins much of the films dramatic tension."
Despite all the criticism I don't think Being John Malkovich is a total dud, and I was glad to see Charlie Kaufman and Spike Jonze reach the potential promised here with Adaptation.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:51 (twenty years ago)
xpost - told you.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:51 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:53 (twenty years ago)
Yeah, I've never feally felt the vibe regarding Fargo, but this is a popularity contest, so I'm not surprised.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:54 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:55 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:56 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:57 (twenty years ago)
(More when I have time...whenever that may be....muhahahaha!)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 21 February 2005 22:57 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Monday, 21 February 2005 22:59 (twenty years ago)
i'd better get ready to defend Pulp Fiction considering how highly i placed it. i think the argument is likely to work along the same lines as the one well put for Trainspotting...
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:00 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:01 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:02 (twenty years ago)
Also Rushmore - starring ILE, you see.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:03 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:04 (twenty years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:06 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:08 (twenty years ago)
Sorry guys, I will accept blame if you deem it necessary.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:17 (twenty years ago)
― a banana (alanbanana), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:23 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:26 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:28 (twenty years ago)
I didn't think Malkovich was spectacular (really really never understood the appeal of the many-Malkoviches scene), but it was okay.
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:32 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:33 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:34 (twenty years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:51 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:53 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:54 (twenty years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 21 February 2005 23:57 (twenty years ago)
"Dazed and Confused"? How could you?
I don't think "Crumb" and "Hoop Dreams" can be easily compared. I didn't feel that the line between subject and director was blurred with "Crumb". I felt like I was watching "The Surreal Life", I kept expecting to see director cameos where he winked at the camera and cackled "wow, check out this freak show!!". No matter how messed up the characters on a reality show appear to be, familiarity stretched over several episodes eventually breeds likeability and sympathy, and that's what watching "Crumb" was like for me.
With "Hoop Dreams", the subject-director line was certainly blurred. I strongly felt like I had a stake in how these kids turned out.
Note: I love both of these movies and both ranked in my top fifteen, but I did find "Hoop Dreams" to be a far more rewarding picture.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 00:35 (twenty years ago)
I wrote all my comments at 3am and apologize for them.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 01:14 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 02:09 (twenty years ago)
― Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 04:39 (twenty years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 04:56 (twenty years ago)
you may like this essay by the philosopher simon critchley:http://www.film-philosophy.com/vol6-2002/n48critchley
― ryan (ryan), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 04:57 (twenty years ago)
heh... no need to apologize, but I'm glad you see the error of your ways. I love that movie -- I'm sure it was in my top ten, if not my top five (I seem to have misplaced my email ballot). I love the slow reveal of everything, the way it unfolds until it's not just about Crumb, but about his family history. It turns out to be a meditation on what severe parental abuse does to children.
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 05:41 (twenty years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 06:31 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 06:40 (twenty years ago)
I'm kinda indifferent towards it. I mean, Pulp Fiction is a good flick, it's fun to watch and all, but it never really touched me in any way. I think both Reservoir Dogs (due to its intensity) and Jackie Brown (due to its more fleshed out characters) were better movies.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 09:35 (twenty years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 12:55 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 12:59 (twenty years ago)
Kill Bill is still my favorite, though.
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 15:08 (twenty years ago)
Groundhog Day (447 points, 24 votes, 2 first-place votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00005UL69.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"I doubt Harold Ramis has ever made or will ever make such a great film as Groundhog Day. Of course, the brilliance of that flick has more to do with the script than with the direction.
I'm sure no one would call it sci-fi (more of a fantasy flick), but it sure has one of the best concepts I've ever seen in a film. Also, it eventually goes past the gimmick (unlike many other concept films) and turns out ot be a truly touching story. And it has two fine performances by two underrated actors: Bill Murray and Andie MacDowell."
"Groundhog Day is the last comedy star vehicle that succeeded on every level...
Every day IS Groundhog Day... We just refine our act in slightly different circumstances. "My years are not advancing as fast as you might think." "
"I have seen Groundhog's Day at least 437 times. I have a rather insane obsession with that movie. For a while, every single joke between me and an old friend of mine would start with a reference to Groundhog's Day."
-- Allyzay
"The isn't the greatest piece of art made in the '90s, but it is easily my favorite film of the '90s. This is Bill Murray's finest role, and it is one of the two or three funniest movies in the history of the cinema, in my opinion. But beyond that, it has the eerie power to make me want to make up for lost time, to do something with my life. A rare feat."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:25 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:27 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:28 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:29 (twenty years ago)
Other than that, close to perfect.
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:29 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:31 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:33 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:34 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:36 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:37 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:38 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:39 (twenty years ago)
I'm not a big Scorsese buff, but I do like The King of Comedy, After Hours, and Bringing Out the Dead, so I guess I should.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:40 (twenty years ago)
It's a bit of a thin movie. I mean, it's great, don't get me wrong. But I would always play my VHS copy in the background while I was cooking, just to have something funny and completely unchallenging going. It's that kind of movie. I don't think re-watchability is a good measure of anything, though.
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:41 (twenty years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:42 (twenty years ago)
I'm holding my breath for the silent otaku majority to bring Ghost in the Shell into the top 4.
― Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:43 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:44 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:45 (twenty years ago)
The Big Lebowski (491 points, 23 votes, 2 first-place votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004R776.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Quotable over a period of many years, and seemingly funnier, too."
"you know you're onto a winner when almost every damn line is a quotable!"
"yeah, it has been embraced by frat-boys and lame hipsters, but it is a truly great film. So carefully written and funny. The entire film can be summed up in one line uttered by the dude near the end of the film. ...The dude abides...? so perfect."
"The Big Lebowski isn't a film, it's a way of life."
"Nothing can be said in any language known to man which will make me think any less of The Big Lebowski...there are few films I consider actually perfect, and it is one of them. So nya."
"There are so many wonderful things in this movie, first of all Jeff Bridge's performance. I heart Jeff Bridges.
I don't like the other Coen Brothers films so much, and I wouldn't make any great claims for this one, but it is awfully funny. My favorite moment is when The Dude, stealthily edges across the room to make a rubbing of the note the Ben Gazzara character made while he was on the phone, only to discover that it was just a ridiculous pornographic doodle. Which sort of neatly captures the whole feeling of the movie."
-- amateurist
"Julianne Moore as a nude performance artist, Tara Reid wanting to suck cock for money...what the hell is there not to love here?"
-- Neudonym
"This is one of those movies that has a casual feel to it that seems like its less of a big calculated production than just a bunch of friends hanging out having a goof and getting it on film. Somehow movies like that I can watch over and over again."
-- David Beckhouse
"bad aspect of this movie is that it kind of ruins bridges in everything else. every time he raises his voice somewhere else, I'm all "walter, you're not WRONG, you're just an ASSHOLE." "
-- g--ff c-nn-n
"I know at least three people who watch this movie religiously (100+ times a year). It's bizarre; there's a really strange cult following to this film where overly stimulated youth (typically philosophy majors/minors) seem to find allegories to every mode of thought & event in the history of humankind.
I really love this film, but not on that kind of level. I think "The Dude" is a great Zen like character, a true "dissociation is not apathy" kind of guy who's just trying to get by. The character development in this film is huge, and often overlooked. Quite possibly my favorite John Goodman performance, and the soundtrack is amazing."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:45 (twenty years ago)
wow, freaky xpost
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:47 (twenty years ago)
― Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)
The only Coen Bros. films I'd watch again are the Hudsucker Proxy and maybe Blood Simple (which is partially due to my love of Frances McDormand's apartment).
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:50 (twenty years ago)
― Jay-Kid (Jay-Kid), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:51 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 20:59 (twenty years ago)
The Big Lebowski wouldn't have been as good without *any* of its 4983 supporting characters.
That said, John Goodman pretty much owns this movie.
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:01 (twenty years ago)
Goodfellas (545 points, 24 votes, 2 first-place votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00004CXX8.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"Food! Killing! Food! Killing! Not since Clemenza schooled Michael Corleone on the finer points of spaghetti sauce and untraceable weaponry have Italian gastronomy and torn Mafioso flesh been so sensuously mingled. Martin Scorsese's 1990 comeback feels like The Godfather on every drug the Don warned us about: three decades of life in an American crime family as remembered by a real-life addict-turned-stool pigeon, Henry Hill (Ray Liotta), whose paranoid freak-out takes the place of Michael's moral rot. Basically, it's a long rat's squeal turned into a long, cinematic brake squeal. Yet there's something satiric in the dissonance between narrator and director. As originally fed to Nicholas Pileggi in his book Wiseguy, this yarn about hoods living high in suburban New York supplies the sort of shocking candor you get from someone on the make. And Scorsese wants to impress us, too: His sheer directorial bravura is the star of the movie. Yet he digresses from the book long enough to dwell on its weirdest and most volatile element: the sociopath Tommy (Joe Pesci), whose "How am I funny?" is this film's "You talkin' to me?" In the end, Scorsese seems to reject Hill's premise (later echoed on The Sopranos) that a business based on the threat of murder has somehow degenerated further. Tommy is an old-school classic--a soul-dead old-school classic--who reminds us that anyone who'd want to be him is either insane or numbed by the romantic power of money in thick wads."
"The signature tracking shot into the Copacabana-- a twin of Jake LaMotta entering the ring for his longed-for title fight -- is, this time, all about Henry sweeping away Karen with privilege, instead of a personal passion. (See Scorsese's IFC interview with Jon Favreau for his borrowings from Ford and Hawks.)"
"I always thought that Sid Vicious' version ends GoodFellas because it's a punk-ass way of giving the finger to the old guard (Sinatra, the Italian Mob) like Henry did.
I saw this movie for the first time in the early nineties, when I was a punk teenager. I immediately loved it and watched it again and again and again. It became the first DVD I ever bought, and will probably become the first DVD that I ever rebuy. The one I have now is a flipper!
I watched it six months ago, half expecting that some of the magic would have dimmed since I'm now a grown man in his thirties. I loved it even more. My favorite movie of all time. Fuck The Godfather."
-- Pleasant Plains
"The only film in my top ten that is not an emotional pick for me, as it didn't have a huge effect on me emotionally. But in my opinion, this is the most important film of the 90s. While Pulp Fiction unleashed legions of dialogue copycat artists, Goodfellas completely reinvented the way people make films. In many ways, I think that most films I've seen since Goodfellas are influenced by it, either by intent or not. Also, Deniro's last good performance (ever?)."
"The tracking shot going into the club is a work of fucking genius. The soundtrack is superb - I defy anyone to do coke-addled paranoia better than the scenes leading up to the arrest of Henry. It covers the food culutre within the mafia lifestyle, the cheapness, the inanity, the casual violence underpinning it. The book is good, but the film takes a great story to another level. My all-time number one film evah."
-- Dave B
"This is the bridge between the rough, streetwise Marty of Mean Streets and Taxi Driver, and the Oscar hound that gave us Gangs of New York and The Aviator. But it’s still great—as bridges go, it’s up there with the Brooklyn."
"Ray Liotta himself isn't totally hot. He was totally hot as Henry Hill in Goodfellas though.
For me, the best part of Goodfellas is when they move to the house with the wall that opens up with the entertainment center inside, but the wall looks like a rock. But that's just because whenever we see it, me and Fred and The Cult all go, "Jimmy's house!" because they have this ludicrious friend who buys all this random expensive shit for no reason, like ramote controls to control his remote controls and the internet for his car.
You definitely are not watching Goodfellas properly if you are getting nothing out of it. Just for the scene where they off Joe Pesci alone, for fuck's sake. It's easily the funniest movie ever after Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure. And I always watch the end credits cos I totally feel that version of My Way, it's the best thing anyone even tangentially related to the Sex Pistols ever did."
-- Ally
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:04 (twenty years ago)
Apart from "erotic," nothing is more subjective than "funny."
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:05 (twenty years ago)
"Excuse me, is your refrigerator running? Because if it is, it probably runs like you - very homosexually."
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:08 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:09 (twenty years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:12 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:13 (twenty years ago)
(also: xpost) Much of the 'insider' humor about rhode island really is pretty damn funny. I was sold on the show the day I realized the protagonist had two testicles for a chin. But I don't think it's really that edgy at all, and I find some of the faux-boundary-pushing stuff kind of annoying.
― Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:15 (twenty years ago)
― n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:15 (twenty years ago)
Rushmore (566 points, 28 votes, 1 first-place vote)
http://www.criterionco.com/content/images/full_boxshot/65_box_348x490.jpg
"For some reason, this movie makes me feel nostalgic. Maybe because my second high school was vaguely similar to Rushmore Academy, and maybe because I was involved in elaborate theater productions. Or maybe because I was a relatively mediocre student who was bored with my classes most of the time. But maybe it's not nostalgia as much as it is the wish that my childhood was as utopian as the one depicted in this film: the main character is a 15-year old genius of sorts whose two best friends are somewhere around 12 and 50, respectively, and where in the end, there's no revenge or comeuppance, but reconciliation across the board. Somehow this movie didn't make 200 million dollars. And Wes Anderson was always overshadowed by the other Anderson, PT, despite PT being a sham artist who doesn't have an original thought in his brain. And maybe Wes is a sham artist as well. But he loves his characters more than he loves camera tricks and old Altman films, and Rushmore is--at this point--his best film."
"one of the best screenplays ever written. So many heart-breaking lines. This is truly Wes Anderson's masterpiece."
"Not too much that I can say that isn’t more eloquently put by Phil Dellio in his great articles regarding or referencing it:
http://members.tripod.com/phildellio/rushmore.html
http://www.rockcritics.com/features/strangemagic.html
http://www.rockcritics.com/features/doublebills.html"
"I've liked all of Wes Andersons films, more or less. Rushmore was a major artisitc leap from Bottle Rocket in his expressive use of cinematic devices. What bothers me about the Royal Tennenbaums is that instead of raising his level of artistry, in visual terms, it plays out like a largely uninspired Rushmore victory lap. The performances were good and their were some poignant moments but I really could have done without the crazy costumes. Some of the jokes fall way flat. Also, the idea of a large dysfunctional wealthy family had really been done to death at that point. The New York Times critic actually had it right, I think when he or she described Tennenbaums as similar to the kinds of plays Max Fisher authored in Rushmore."
-- theodore fogelsanger
"Rushmore, well, I like J. Rosenbaum's line: "about as close to 90s Lubitsch as we deserve to get." "
-- Justyn Dillingham
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:16 (twenty years ago)
1. Stewie.2. Brian.3. 80s references.4. Adam West.5. Lois's dark side.
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:18 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:19 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:20 (twenty years ago)
Pulp Fiction (683 points, 28 votes, 3 first-place votes)
http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B00005LDBF.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
"It's opening day was a rock concert moment for good reasons. Tarantino almost seems to take the tension and release cycles of Reservoir Dogs, and make them more pures and abstract, turning this movie into a naked excercise in suspense and laughter, suspense and laughter. He borrows shamelessly from other movies to create new icons that are unquestionably powerful, though often in mysterious ways. (Jules pointing his gun at the camera still gives me a jolt.) He comments on race by not exactly commenting on it. He writes dialogue as music, and lets the actors rock it, but allows for foreign-film-like pauses, silence, and pure pop soundtrack. He loves the washed-out look of those horizontal L.A. suburbs, loves letting it blur by in the background of car windows, and is better at startling car crashes than anyone else in movies. The script with Roger Avery feels like a waking dream: Hey, what if this happened? It's a movie about loving movies, and what better movie subject is there?"
"Dangerously overrated these days, but I still silently thank Tarantino everytime I reach over turn up “Son of A Preacher Man” when it comes on the radio."
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:21 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:21 (twenty years ago)
The Neverending Story Pt. II (666 points)
― n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:22 (twenty years ago)
Kind of like how ILM wouldn't think the best album of the 90s was Loveless or the best single of the 90s was "Common People"?
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)
Rushmore is--at this point--his best film."This is true, and looks like it always will be.
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:23 (twenty years ago)
― n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:24 (twenty years ago)
― MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:25 (twenty years ago)
Yeah, but the results of this poll felt more eclectic and less canonical than with the music polls.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:25 (twenty years ago)
Me either. Maybe I should've ended the poll with the #1 getting a hate review, just to spin it around. Since it has the honor of winning anyway.
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:27 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:27 (twenty years ago)
http://www.imdb.com/chart/1990s
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:27 (twenty years ago)
― Remy (null) (x Jeremy), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:27 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:29 (twenty years ago)
― The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:34 (twenty years ago)
Films that should've made the list but weren't even nominated:
There's Something About Mary Life Stinks Lost Highway Cabaret Balkan The Celluloid Closet Flirting with Disaster Kamikaze Taxi Porco Rosso Night on Earth Priest The Sweet Hereafter The War Zone Your Friends and Neighbors
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:37 (twenty years ago)
I think Rushmore also benefits from having only three central characters, and over time I'm beginning to think that the best performance in Anderson's films belongs to Olivia Williams.
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:37 (twenty years ago)
Days of Being Wild Metropolitan The Fifth Element In the Company of MenMars Attacks! Exotica Army of Darkness Breaking the Waves Malcolm X Bad Boy Bubby
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:40 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:42 (twenty years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:43 (twenty years ago)
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:47 (twenty years ago)
One vote or one point? Very different things - I don't have the ability to quickly generate a list of one-vote films.
Zero vote films:
American Dream American Job Autumn SunBio-Dome Box of Moonlight Cabin Boy Career Opportunities The Distinguished GentlemanDon't Tell Mom the Babysitter's Dead Joe Versus the Volcano The Long Day Closes Ma vie en rose The Match Factory Girl Metal and Melancholy Small Soldiers ToysTwelfth Night The Wild Reeds Winter Sleepers
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:48 (twenty years ago)
I am willing to admit that Pulp Fiction's placement in my own top 10 (I forget where exactly) may have a lot to do with it being the most imaginative film I'd ever seen when it came out.
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:49 (twenty years ago)
1 The Thin Red Line (Terrence Malick, 1998)2 Chungking Express (Wong Kar-wai, 1994)3 Three Colors: Red (Krzysztof Kieslowski, 1994)4 Crumb (Terry Zwigoff, 1994)5 Office Space (Mike Judge, 1999)6 The Terrorist (Santosh Sivan, 1999)7 Three Colors: Blue (Krzysztof Kieslowski, 1993)8 Il Postino (Michael Radford, 1994)9 Safe (Todd Haynes, 1995)10 Gattaca (Andrew Niccol, 1997)11 Bad Boy Bubby (Rolf de Heer, 1993)12 Little Dieter Needs to Fly (Werner Herzog, 1997)13 Hands on a Hard Body (S.R. Bindler, 1997)14 Mr. Death: The Rise and Fall of Fred A. Leuchter, Jr. (Errol Morris, 1999)15 Princess Mononoke (Hiyao Miyazaki, 1997)16 Jesus’ Son (Alison Maclean, 1999)17 The God of Cookery (Stephen Chow and Lee Lik-Chi, 1996)18 Groundhog Day (Harold Ramis, 1993)19 Army of Darkness (Sam Raimi, 1993)20 Heat (Michael Mann, 1995)21 Being John Malkovich (Spike Jonze, 1999)22 Perfect Blue (Satoshi Kon, 1997)23 Breaking the Waves (Lars von Trier, 1996)24 Taste of Cherry (Abbas Kiarostami, 1997)25 Pi (Darren Aronofsky, 1998)26 Buffalo 66 (Vincent Gallo, 1998)27 Election (Alexander Payne, 1999)28 Mars Attacks! (Tim Burton, 1996)29 The Nightmare Before Christmas (Henry Selick, 1994)30 Rushmore (Wes Anderson, 1998)
― Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:49 (twenty years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:50 (twenty years ago)
C'mon, people!
I always find it astonishing that people can nominate films they don't intend on voting for.
(I meant one vote rather than one point. I imagine the better portion of my own ballot is in that category.)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:50 (twenty years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:51 (twenty years ago)
1 - Dazed and Confused (Richard Linklater, 1993) - Jimmy Mod2 - Eyes Wide Shut (Stanley Kubrick, 1999) - gabbneb3 - The Straight Story (David Lynch, 1999) - tremendoid4 - Kids (Larry Clark, 1995) - LeCoq5 - Sweet and Lowdown (Woody Allen, 1999) - Martin Skidmore6 - Before Sunrise (Richard Linklater, 1995) - Mil7 - Jackie Brown (Quentin Tarantino, 1997) - lemin8 - Election (Alexander Payne, 1999) - milozauckerman9 - Chungking Express (Wong Kar-wai, 1994) - Jimmy Mod10 - Heavenly Creatures (Peter Jackson, 1994) - David Merryweather
11 - Jesus' Son (Alison Maclean, 1999) - Jeff-PTTL12 - Ratcatcher (Lynne Ramsay, 1999) - mark p13 - Three Kings (David O. Russell, 1999) - n/a14 - Cruel Intentions (Roger Kumble, 1999) - milozauckerman15 - Slacker (Richard Linklater, 1991) - It's hard to kill a horse with a flute16 - Goodbye, South Goodbye (Hsiao-hsien Hou, 1996) - o. nate17 - Bound (Andy and Larry Wachowski, 1996) - Pears can just fuck right off.18 - Rushmore (Wes Anderson, 1998) - peter smith19 - Scream (Wes Craven, 1996) - milozauckerman20 - The Thin Red Line (Terrence Malick, 1998) - Jeff-PTTL
21 - Tank Girl (Rachel Talalay, 1995) - milozauckerman22 - Office Space (Mike Judge, 1999) - Jeff-PTTL23 - Goodfellas (Martin Scorsese, 1990) - Allyzay Science Explosion24 - Ed Wood (Tim Burton, 1994)- Pears can just fuck right off25 - Hoop Dreams (Steve James, 1994) - Alex in SF26 - Dead Man (Jim Jarmusch, 1995) - tremendoid27 - Rounders (John Dahl, 1998) - Yanc3y28 - Vincent and Theo (Robert Altman, 1990) - milozauckerman29 - Twelve Monkeys (Terry Gilliam, 1995) - hobart paving30 - Unforgiven (Clint Eastwood, 1992) - Formerly Lee G
― milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:51 (twenty years ago)
― Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:52 (twenty years ago)
Crumb The Iron Giant Naked Office Space Toy StoryMiller's Crossing Lone Star Glengarry Glen RossHeavenly Creatures Fallen Angels Slacker Babe The Nightmare Before Christmas Festen, aka The Celebration Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me Dead Alive, aka Braindead The Butcher Boy Beau travail Drunken Master II Short CutsFucking Amal, aka Show Me Love The Apostle Gattaca Gummo Amateur Buffalo 66 Sweet and LowdownLa Haine
Wow, that's a lot more than I expected...
― Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:53 (twenty years ago)
Yes, please.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:54 (twenty years ago)
― Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:55 (twenty years ago)
-- Eric H. (ephende...), February 22nd, 2005 3:50 PM. (Eric H.)
ONE OF US! ONE OF US! GABBA GABBA WE ACCEPT YOU!
― n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:55 (twenty years ago)
― jocelyn (Jocelyn), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 21:56 (twenty years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 22:00 (twenty years ago)
You're all going to turn me into a chicken woman now, aren't you?
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 22:00 (twenty years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 22:03 (twenty years ago)
I was fifteen too when it came out, and I remember trying to get to see it, but I couldn't because in Finland it had an age limit of 18 due to the drug scenes. As a result I only saw it three or fours years later, and was probably less impressed than I would've been at 15.
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 22:09 (twenty years ago)
― n/a (Nick A.), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 22:11 (twenty years ago)
― The Horse of Babylon (the pirate king), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 22:32 (twenty years ago)
― Hey Jude, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 22:33 (twenty years ago)
― Hey Jude, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 22:34 (twenty years ago)
...
The Big Lebowski, on the other hand, pretty much rules.
These two comments in such close proximity immediately turned me against the whole "Gutter Balls" sequence, which wanks in Technicolor.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 22:37 (twenty years ago)
― Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 22:40 (twenty years ago)
Well, I nominated, but didn't vote, because I've barely seen any of these movies. Also the nominating seemed more interesting than the voting. But didn't I nominate Babe? I'm glad it did so well. I'm also curious who actually voted for my other nomination, Orlando.
― Casuistry (Chris P), Tuesday, 22 February 2005 23:13 (twenty years ago)
― Dan I., Tuesday, 22 February 2005 23:24 (twenty years ago)
― Dan I., Tuesday, 22 February 2005 23:25 (twenty years ago)
Dude, I saw BOTTLE ROCKET on-screen at a festival. Now shower me with hosannas.
― schmoo mcshmoo, Tuesday, 22 February 2005 23:37 (twenty years ago)
1. Chungking Express [9 votes, 0 first, 25.2 points/vote] #152. Pulp Fiction [28, 3, 24.4] #13. Iron Giant [10, 0, 22.8] #144. Goodfellas [24, 2, 22.71] #35. Dead Man [10, 1, 22.70] #156. The Thin Red Line [13, 2, 22.3] #117. Crumb [15, 1, 21.5] #108. The Big Lebowski [23, 2, 21.3] #49. Being John Malkovich [20, 4, 20.9] #710. Dazed and Confused [16, 1, 20.8] #9
11. Rushmore [28, 1, 20.2] #212. Election [18, 1, 19.2] #813. Fargo [23, 0, 18.7] #614. Groundhog Day [24, 2, 18.6] #515. Reservoir Dogs [13, 0, 18.0] #1316. Heat [14, 0, 17.4] #1217. Naked [12, 0, 17.3] #1818. Three Kings [13, 1, 15.8] #1919. Trainspotting [14, 0, 14.9] #1720. Office Space [14, 0, 14.6] #20
― andrew s (andrew s), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 00:29 (twenty years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 01:31 (twenty years ago)
and now...NOMINATIONS (optional) for the ILX Top 100 Films of the 1980's!!!
― Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 23 February 2005 01:40 (twenty years ago)
― Leeeter van den Hoogenband (Leee), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 02:23 (twenty years ago)
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 02:27 (twenty years ago)
FUCK ALL Y'ALL
― latebloomer: HE WHOM DUELS THE DRAFGON IN ENDLESS DANCE (latebloomer), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 02:35 (twenty years ago)
True.
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 03:00 (twenty years ago)
― Anyone Who Can Pick Up A Frying Pan Pwns Death (AaronHz), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 06:52 (twenty years ago)
― Anyone Who Can Pick Up A Frying Pan Pwns Death (AaronHz), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 07:03 (twenty years ago)
Re Michael Mann, since I just saw Collateral -- another slick big-screen TV show with a MUCH sillier antagonist than Heat -- fuck him and LA.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 14:35 (twenty years ago)
99. La Haine 99. The Crying Game97. Sweet and Lowdown97. Secrets and Lies96. After Life95. Taste of Cherry94. The Blair Witch Project92. Naked Lunch92. Clueless90. 12 Monkeys90. Buffalo 6689. Amateur84. Happy Together84. Gummo84. Gattaca84. Casino84. Bill and Ted’s Bogus Journey83. The Apostle82. All About My Mother81. Fucking Amal79. Out of Sight79. Leon (aka The Professional)78. Bottle Rocket77. Schizopolis76. Hard Boiled73. The Straight Story73. Short Cuts73. Schindler’s List72. Drunken Master II71. Beau Travail70. Starship Troopers69. The Butcher Boy67. LA Confidential67. Jacob’s Ladder66. Run Lola Run64. The Limey64. Ghost Dog: The Way of the Samurai63. Clerks62. Topsy Turvy61. Dead Alive (aka Braindead)59. Unforgiven59. Pi57. Velvet Goldmine57. The Insider56. The Shawshank Redemption55. The Player54. The City of Lost Children53. Hoop Dreams52. Wayne’s World51. Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me50. Ratcatcher49. Festen (aka The Celebration)48. The Silence of the Lambs47. The Matrix46. Three Colors: Blue44. Terminator 2: Judgement Day44. The Nightmare Before Christmas43. Babe42. The Usual Suspects40. Slacker40. Happiness39. Fallen Angels38. Three Colors: Red37. Before Sunrise36. Heavenly Creatures35. Safe34. The Ice Storm33. Glengarry Glen Ross32. Lone Star30. Waiting for Guffman30. Miller’s Crossing29. Delicatessen28. Toy Story27. Boogie Nights25. Jackie Brown25. Eyes Wide Shut24. Ed Wood22. Magnolia22. Barton Fink21. South Park: Bigger, Longer, and Uncut20. Office Space19. Three Kings18. Naked17. Trainspotting15. Dead Man15. Chungking Express14. The Iron Giant13. Reservoir Dogs12. Heat11. The Thin Red Line10. Crumb9. Dazed and Confused8. Election7. Being John Malkovich6. Fargo5. Groundhog Day4. The Big Lebowski3. Goodfellas2. Rushmore1. Pulp Fiction
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)
― Sven Bastard (blueski), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 16:32 (twenty years ago)
― Anyone Who Can Pick Up A Frying Pan Pwns Death (AaronHz), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 19:31 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 19:34 (twenty years ago)
― Fish fingers all in a line (kenan), Wednesday, 23 February 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)
Bad Boy Bubby is pretty damn good.
― Rock Hardy, Sunday, 24 June 2007 03:23 (eighteen years ago)
I remember liking the next film by the same director even better, it was about a small girl who suddenly stops speaking. I wonder if it's available anywhere, I haven't heard anything about it ever since I saw it on a movie festival 10+ years ago.
― Tuomas, Sunday, 24 June 2007 11:28 (eighteen years ago)
Was there ever a "top 100 films of the 80s" thread?
― Jeb, Sunday, 24 June 2007 12:57 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, though I can't remember which film won.
― Tuomas, Sunday, 24 June 2007 13:02 (eighteen years ago)
POLL RESULTS: Top 100 Films of the 1980s
Oh yeah, it was Blue Velvet.
― Tuomas, Sunday, 24 June 2007 13:05 (eighteen years ago)
wait, where is nekromantik part 2 on this list?
― scott seward, Sunday, 24 June 2007 13:23 (eighteen years ago)
and safe should have been number one.
gattaca??? (???)
― scott seward, Sunday, 24 June 2007 13:24 (eighteen years ago)
plus, no ruby in paradise no credibility.
― scott seward, Sunday, 24 June 2007 13:26 (eighteen years ago)
"i got yer pulp fiction right here, geek!"
http://home.comcast.net/~flickhead/thelma001.jpg
― scott seward, Sunday, 24 June 2007 13:37 (eighteen years ago)
I absolutely remember American Beauty and The Virgin Suicides being in either this list or the 00's list, but they've both somehow disappeared. Oh well.
― billstevejim, Thursday, 12 July 2007 06:35 (eighteen years ago)
great thread.
― piscesx, Wednesday, 6 August 2008 03:25 (seventeen years ago)
Ahead of this, I would redo one of your ridiculous music polls.
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Monday, 31 October 2011 21:04 (fourteen years ago)
The week's most important election.
http://www.slantmagazine.com/film/feature/the-100-best-films-of-the-1990s/334
Kinda stunned that a lotta folx like #2 even more than I do, not so much that Democrats don't like Bulworth.
― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Friday, 9 November 2012 15:55 (twelve years ago)
I found it oddly heartwarming when Gremlins 2 made the list.
― Room 227 (cryptosicko), Friday, 9 November 2012 16:22 (twelve years ago)
Did nuthin for me at the time, but y'know, sadistic recycling of pre-adolescent pop images, wow, how exciting.
This was pretty good for a Hall of Fame editorial response to petty reader gripes: "Last time I checked, no one who's seen more than 100 movies actually likes Forrest Gump."
― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 11 November 2012 02:17 (twelve years ago)
We're all dudes, I know, but some of us are feminists.
found your masthead
― johnny crunch, Sunday, 11 November 2012 02:33 (twelve years ago)
morbs did u vote? share your ballot here?
― johnny crunch, Sunday, 11 November 2012 02:35 (twelve years ago)
yes, no
― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 11 November 2012 05:07 (twelve years ago)
glad to see pig in the city there, or anywhere ever
― I have done bad. I love my pj's. (zachlyon), Sunday, 11 November 2012 06:47 (twelve years ago)
not so much that Democrats don't like Bulworth
Also not surprised to see people with accurately calibrated compasses for comedy don't like Bulworth.
― Bobby Ken Doll (Eric H.), Sunday, 11 November 2012 07:03 (twelve years ago)
they're too "post-Obama" whatever the frig that means.
― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 11 November 2012 14:59 (twelve years ago)
(Bulworth is more tragedy than satire from 2012's view)
― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 11 November 2012 15:00 (twelve years ago)
frankly, I'd readjust my ballot even ten weeks later (I finally resaw a couple on the 100 I'd likely drop altogether now); I'll give you the top 20 tho.
1. A Moment of Innocence2. The Decalogue3. Underground4. Goodfellas5. Close-Up6. Cure7. Rushmore8. The Butcher Boy9. Flowers of Shanghai10. Topsy-Turvy
11. The Portrait of a Lady12. Paris Is Burning13. My Own Private Idaho14. JLG/JLG15. Groundhog Day16. Conspirators of Pleasure17. Being John Malkovich18. The Iron Giant19. Slacker20. Poison
― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 11 November 2012 15:11 (twelve years ago)
I found it interesting to compare Slant's list with the AVClub one from a few weeks ago.
― Sandy Denny Real Estate (jaymc), Sunday, 11 November 2012 15:13 (twelve years ago)
Bulworth is post-funny.
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 11 November 2012 15:18 (twelve years ago)
sadistic recycling of pre-adolescent pop images, wow, how exciting.
my response to Eyes Wide Shut
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 11 November 2012 15:19 (twelve years ago)
I had EWS #73, I have no idea if this reclamation by the poll has legs. Or just masks.
― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 11 November 2012 15:27 (twelve years ago)
My ballot:
1. Showgirls2. Satantango3. Eyes Wide Shut4. Paris Is Burning5. Taste of Cherry6. Short Cuts7. Carlito's Way8. Bitter Moon9. Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me10. The Last Bolshevik11. Jackie Brown12. Breaking the Waves13. Crash14. Close-up15. The Hole16. Run Lola Run17. Poison18. JFK19. Serial Mom20. My Own Private Idaho21. American Movie22. Spiritual Voices23. Husbands and Wives24. Waiting for Guffman25. Fargo
― Bobby Ken Doll (Eric H.), Sunday, 11 November 2012 15:57 (twelve years ago)
It's The Thin Red Line at #1 that I'm bummed about. (I had it at #84.)
― Bobby Ken Doll (Eric H.), Sunday, 11 November 2012 15:59 (twelve years ago)
1. Crumb2. Boogie Nights3. Jackie Brown4. Rushmore5. The Virgin Suicides6. Fargo7. American Beauty8. The Straight Story9. Nixon10. Smoke11. The Ice Storm12. Hoop Dreams13. Miller’s Crossing14. Affliction15. Reservoir Dogs16. Goodfellas17. Jungle Fever18. Short Cuts19. Boyz n the Hood20. Blue21. Dazed and Confused22. Menace II Society23. Election24. Histoire(s) du Cinéma25. Visions of Light
Yes, I know--American, American, American, American Beauty, American Beauty, etc., etc. Whatever.
― clemenza, Sunday, 11 November 2012 16:47 (twelve years ago)
i just watched 'affliction' a day or so ago - prob wouldnt crack my top hundred but it's p good
praise of 'bitter moon' is p odd 2 me, maybe need to revisit
― johnny crunch, Sunday, 11 November 2012 18:21 (twelve years ago)
I actually remember liking Bitter Moon at the time but thought its current reputation was as a camp curio and was surprised to see it listed.
― Room 227 (cryptosicko), Sunday, 11 November 2012 18:40 (twelve years ago)
ILX's Top Films of the 1990s list on Letterboxd:
https://boxd.it/2bG6m
Pretty good list looking back at it. My #1 would have been Fargo had I voted at the time.
― ilxor, Saturday, 17 November 2018 21:23 (six years ago)
Huh, I wouldn't have thought Pulp Fiction would win a list on this board.
― jmm, Saturday, 17 November 2018 21:48 (six years ago)
Some interesting lists here:
https://www.indiewire.com/gallery/best-movies-90s-stars-lists/
ARI ASTER, writer-director (“Midsommar”)“Goodfellas”“Eyes Wide Shut”“Topsy-Turvy”“Starship Troopers” “And Life Goes On” (aka “Life, And Nothing More”) “Defending Your Life”“Safe”“The Kingdom” & “The Kingdom II” (aka “Riget” & “Riget II”) “Raise the Red Lantern” “The Hudsucker Proxy”
CARRIE COON, actress (“The Gilded Age”)In chronological order:
“To Sleep With Anger”“Light Sleeper”“Naked” “The Remains of the Day”“The Story of Qui Ju” “Chungking Express”“Three Colors: Blue”“American Movie” “Topsy-Turvy”“35 Up/42 Up” (1991/1998)
ROBERT GREENE, writer, director, editor (“Procession”)“Frost” (Fred Kelemen) “A Moment of Innocence” (Mohsen Makhmalbaf) “Beau Travail” (Claie Denis) “From the East” (Chantal Akerman) “Belfast, Maine” (Frederick Wiseman) “After Life” (Hirokazu Kore-eda) “Happy Together” (Wong Kar Wai) “Hoop Dreams” (Steve James) “Paris Is Burning” (Jennie Livingston, et al.) “How to Live in the German Federal Republic” (Harun Farocki)
SANDI TAN, director (“Shirkers”)“Bitter Moon”“Lovers on the Bridge”“My Own Private Idaho”“Leolo”“Boogie Nights”“The Double Life of Veronique” / “Center Stage” aka “Actress” (tied”)“In the Heat of the Sun” “Man on the Moon”“Portrait of a Lady”“Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me”
― Bait Kush (Eric H.), Thursday, 25 August 2022 15:28 (three years ago)
Paul Schrader has Affliction on his list; I'd have to agree with him.
― clemenza, Thursday, 25 August 2022 15:36 (three years ago)