Which body part do you find the most attractive?
Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
that messed up.
Its a
merkin
― Ed, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
aah I know about Merkins (though I'm not sure why) A couple of
centuries ago, the way that ladies of the night cleared up their
various ailments was to shave all their pubes off, of course this
marked them out as being damaged goods, and so the merkin was born, a
handy cover-up to make it look as if they were erm boxfresh, as it
were.
― cabbage, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Exactly which ailments are cured by shaving off pubes?
― Emma, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Pubic termites are killed when you shave off the pubes.
― Pete, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
thankyou Pete, yup, pubic termites, plus I think some of the
tinctures thay may have used for the pox used to cause moulting too.
I dread to think what was contained in the glue they used though.
― cabbage, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
alot of the syphlitics died of mecury(sp) posioning .
― anthony, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Loads of salons do that shape cutting thing! They have special little
stencils and you can either do it in reverse (have the shape waxed
OUT of your pubes) or the regular way (make your pubes into a shape).
I've never done it because it just seems way too weird, "Hey, look,
you took off your pants and there's a playboy bunny!"
― Ally, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I have never shaved my pubes. I never would. The whole idea repulses
me, and if anyone ever asked me to, I'd kick them out of bed. The hair
is there for a reason- it is to collect the scent and pheremone
hormones of the women.
Then again, I don't really have that much hair down there. It doesn't
creep out over the tops of my thighs and stomach- the first time I saw
a woman with that sort of hair, it... gave me quite a turn.
I've just realised that the most attractive thing on a man is actually
his fringe. Fringe and nose. (Paul will now spend the rest of the day
fuming over men I know with large noses, big fringes and hairless
chests...)
― masonic boom, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Oh, and I actually kinda like men who are shorter than me. (At 5'8",
it's not hard to find them) I often find them very cute, vis a vis my
"awwww..." reactions to known shorties like Thom Yorke and Jay
Ferguson.
(Cue Paul going... "Hmmm, big nose, hairless chest, floppy fringe,
short... you're on about DAN CLARK again, aren't you?!?!?!?")
― masonic boom, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Argh, creeping out over the sides and the stomach! ARRRGH! You ruined
my day! I remember at the corporate challenge there was this girl in
a belly shirt and shorts, and she had a very prominent happy trail
and a guy-hairy back. I was just horrified. I mean great for her if
she is happy with herself, but my god I'd put on a long shirt if I
was like that, at the very least.
― Ally, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
in a funk b4 taking off backpacking around australia, i shaved off
all my body hair from the neck down - who woulda thunk htat after a
38 hour bus trip I would end up in some hospital ward with a boil the
size of a golf ball on my inner thigh...ouch
― Geoff, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
It makes me laugh to think those two events are related, sorry.
― Ally, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Was the boil related to the shaving or no? I've heard that bad shaving
can result in ingrown hairs, which would make very painful boils,
indeed, I would imagine.
― masonic boom, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
A female friend of mine doesn't shave her legs and has the softest nicest leg
hairs ever.
― Ed, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Hmmmm... Someone once shaved my pubic hair completely whilst I was
unconscious, and it wasn't a pleasant experience when I came around
(don't ask). Had to have my chest shaved fairly recently at the
hospital, too, which itched like a monster when it grew back. And I
looked about 12.
Hah Kate - I have a fringe! So what if I'm taller... at least I have
red hair... Nah, it's a losing battle.
― Paul Strange, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
For some reason I can only think of this question in terms of disembodied body
parts. So, I'm having trouble answering. But if pushed, I'd be an ass man.
That's not true or anything. It's just that I've liked the phrase 'ASS MAN', ever
since Kramer had it as a license plate on Seinfeld.
Disembodied asses would suck ass, though. What is it with ILE and asses
today?
― Nick, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
You are beginng to seduce me Paul.
― anthony, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
me to seduce you
― anthony, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Scrub what I said about skinny wimmins. I just went out for dinner with my
flatmate and our waitress had the most erotically attractive shoulderblades
and vertebrae
― Ed, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Q: Is the very common guy-must-be-taller rule the female equivalent
of many guys'
no-fat-chicks policy ?
Man, this is why I have no dates then, eh? No one likes fat chicks
anymore. Especially fat chicks with no hips or asses. Can't
win.
And speaking of hair, I'm very very pale and have dark hair. ANY
hair on me ends up making me look like monkey woman, and I wonder if
I'm condemned to a life of shaving.
― Melissa W, Saturday, 14 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I hear you. Not only do I have dark hair + pale skin, but I have dark
thick *curly* hair, which causes all kinds of problems when it starts
growing back. It means I can't be terribly creative in my shaving
habits - just shave what needs to be shaved.
― Kerry Keane, Saturday, 14 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
My last gf had thick dark curly hair and it was lovely.
― Ed, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Melissa, you are smoking crack. That pic of you that you linked to on
the "who's your daddy ?" thread is gorgeous, and you look nowhere near
fat. My girlfriend is significantly larger than you are, and I think
she's beautiful and sexy and I love her to death. Guys who reject all
larger-than-average girls from the getgo = pond scum that you should
be more than happy to not be involved with.
― Patrick, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
"no fat chix" = mooted and bruited by
retards with penises, yes, BUT:
Largely policed by mags written, edited,
paid for and read by gurlz...
The Marie Claire with hear'say on the front
w/no clothes on had a ninteresting piece
inside on ultra-fatness as prized chickfactor
in Jamaica, where the unfat-by-nature take
ILLEGAL CHICKEN HORMONES to plump up
and snag a man (tho ICH bring with them
industrial-strength halitosis and diarrhoea
rowr)
― mark s, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
"no fat chix" = mooted and bruited by retards with penises, yes,
BUT: Largely policed by mags written, edited, paid for and read by
gurlz
Very true, Mark, and it's a kind of being-your-own-worst-enemy that I
can't understand at all. Why would anyone buy a magazine (or buy into
the magazine's mentality) whose entire purpose is to make you feel
inadequate about who you are and what you look like ? I think this
would make a good topic for a thread. And it gets to the point where
what those mags say women should look like becomes more important than
what guys actually look for (i.e. A LOT of guys actually LOVE big
asses, starting with me. Sir Mix-a-Lot = not an isolated case by any
stretch of the imagination).
― Patrick, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
The Daily mail too.
Basically there is a claque of style fascists who make the most expensive
clothes for the richest people who have an in ordinate sway over some wierd
idea of what's beautiful. I have no fixed ideas really about what I find
attractive. I am attracted to complete people not individual body parts. To say
looks are unimportant would be a bare faced lie, but they are only a part of the
whole wonderful mix.
― Ed, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Daily Mail: ?? Don't follow that, Ed. Who the
hell takes their style from the Mail?
And superwealthy high-end fashion no
longer determines "street" fashion: this
hasn't really been so since the 60s; if
anything the flow is the other way...
Elle et al is totally at the mercy of those who
buy it: it's not a top-down phnom, it's a
middle-out phnom.
― mark s, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Not that I read it very often, sometimes it gets left lying around somehere, it
has huge style beauty and fashion sections which continue the srtistos
oppressing plebs style of the rest of the paper. Full of high fashion articles
about brest enhancements diet plans etc. The society pages are full of the sort
of rich idiots who are the high fashion customers.
― Ed, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
This should be a new thread. I can't think of a way of introducing it though.
― Ed, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
It is another thread now. I have introduced it
by cheeking you, Ed.
― mark s, Sunday, 15 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Melissa, you are smoking crack. That pic of you that you linked to
on the "who's your daddy ?" thread is gorgeous, and you look nowhere
near fat. My girlfriend is significantly larger than you are, and I
think she's beautiful and sexy and I love her to death. Guys who
reject all larger-than-average girls from the getgo = pond scum that
you should be more than happy to not be involved with.
Add 60 lbs. to that pic and that's me now.
I'm not big in an attractive way. I actually would prefer to be
curvy and healthily large, but I'm all amorphous and disgusting.
Or maybe that's all in my head but I certainly don't get attention
from any guys.
― Melissa W, Tuesday, 17 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I hate it when people blame magazines or publications for this sort
of thing. Do you know how poorly these magazines sell when they put a
model that doesn't fit a very strict stereotype on the cover? It
doesn't matter if the model is heavier/thinner than average models or
if she's ethnic, it doesn't sell nearly as well as a magazine with
the (EXTRODINARILY UNATTRACTIVE BTW) Gisele, for example, on the
cover. Who dictates this? Obviously, the people buying the magazine.
I'm not saying it's good or it's right or anything like that, but
it's the truth. Models that divert from the model-norm don't sell,
and most magazines aren't willing to take a chance on their sales to
try to inundate the public with new standards of model perfection.
― Ally, Tuesday, 17 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
The problem with this argument though is that it assumes that
magazines have no other goal or ideal than selling a lot. This may be
true from a strict free-market pov but it's a bit limiting. It's the
old NME why-we-dont-have-blacks-on-the-cover position, and
superficially it's sympathetic. The NME's argument was always 'we put
the predictable stuff on the cover so we can sell it and get a bigger
audience for the unpredictable stuff'. But big fashion magazines make
no pretence of this at all as far as I can see. That doesn't make
them a social ill, but it's hardly admirable.
(NB Style and fashion mags nichely for big women are even worse
because they combine paranoid positivity, a preachiness
about 'society' and a total slavering embrace of the attitudes that
go hand in hand with the body-as-consumer-good position they pretend
to deplore. The contradiction isn't as tedious as the endless
positivity though.)
― Tom, Tuesday, 17 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Um, I'd say most fashion mags don't have another goal besides selling
loads and making money. I'd rather NOT have the pretense than have
something ridiculous like NME, which knows damn well that a two
paragraph blurb about something "out there" isn't going to get bigger
attention for obscure or weird music. That's just lying, and which
would we rather have, lying or honesty?
I don't really agree with the argument ethically, but it is the
argument and quite frankly you can't fault them from a business POV.
If people would buy magazines with, say, Emme on the cover more
oftne, then they'd use larger models more often. It just doesn't
happen though.
Which is of course a bigger argument to get into: why doesn't
it happen? If all these people are so hung up on the idea that
magazines should use larger models/smaller models/ethnic
models/models with 6 toes/whatever, why don't they sell?
― Ally, Tuesday, 17 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Agreed that the greater 'why' is interesting too and overlooked.
I'm not talking about covers really cos the on-the-cover argument is
evading the issue (no matter which side uses it). Put Kate Moss or
The Strokes on the cover, sure, who cares, then people buy it and
inside they find Kate/Strokes as desired but ALSO an ethnic
or 'curvy' model or Fennesz or Missy Elliott. All I want from any
magazine is variety - put anyone you want on the bloody cover, I
don't care. Or does featuring un-modellish models *anywhere* inside
also lead to that fatal sales drop?
Incidentally the NME while being very disingenuous wasnt totally
dishonest - I *did* find out about tons of less mainstream stuff when
I started reading the mag because I'd read the whole thing and so the
two-para review of someone further out would seep into the brain just
like the eight-page Wonder Stuff special (gah).
― Tom, Tuesday, 17 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
The cover of a magazine says an awful lot about the person buying it -
ie - when you hand it over to the cashier she will look at said
magazine and identify it with you. Hence the fashion conscious want
to be seen with fashion conscious magazines. However it is not as
simple as the name of the magazine, the model on the cover also says
a lot. Hence super svelte model on cover says "I identify, wish to be
like, am this woman". Someone who does not fit fashion magazine norm
would therefore put a negative connotation in exactly the same way.
The words onthe cover I daresay are equally as important (buying
Cosmo says "I have lots of sex").
NME is perfect example of this as most NME fans in say the early
nineties were into indie. Therefore if you had a rap artist on the
cover a) indie boy might not like him, but b) indie boy could not be
him or identify with because he was black. I would be interested by
the way to see if Elle's circulation went down whenever they had one
of the few black supermodels on the cover.
― Pete, Tuesday, 17 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
People who buy magazines of beautiful people shoudlnt be shown
reality ayways. They should be held down for a pube shaving
― Mike Hanle y, Tuesday, 17 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Elle's sales DID drop, unfortunately. I don't have any exact link for
an article or anything, but I remember a big hubbub over it and
people using it as proof that the general populace are racist.
Obviously whose picture is inside the magazine isn't going to affect
sales nearly as much as the appearance of the cover, which is why you
do see more diversity inside the pages. Granted the body types are
all still exactly alike (they use that pesky "The designers only
provide us with samples in XYZ sizes" excuse), but the racial makeup
and quirks are more apparent inside the pages than outside. The only
magazine I haven't noticed that with is, actually, Cosmo, whose
readers are all apparently white nymphomaniacs according to their
editors.
― Ally, Tuesday, 17 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
GREAT SEX! Thats the lead in to many women's magazines . IN bright
orange letters
― Mike Hanle y, Tuesday, 17 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Hence the fashion conscious want to be seen with fashion conscious
magazines. However it is not as simple as the name of the magazine,
the model on the cover also says a lot. Hence super svelte model on
cover says "I identify, wish to be like, am this woman". Someone who
does not fit fashion magazine norm would therefore put a negative
connotation in exactly the same way.
While I'm sure that this is true, and only human, would I be opening a
big can of worms if I also said that it's retarded, and a source of
evil ?
― Patrick, Tuesday, 17 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Melissa - I have no reason whatsoever to believe anything you're
saying :p
― Patrick, Tuesday, 17 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I should scan a recent pic of me then...
I'm not even sure recents pics exist as I've been avoiding cameras
and contact with the oustide world.
― Melissa W, Wednesday, 18 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I think buying Cosmo does not say 'I have a lot of sex', it says 'I
need to be told how to have sex'.
― Emma, Wednesday, 18 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Yes exactly, it seems a bit unfair to say that buying Cosmo sez
you're getting action and buying Razzle doesn't.
― Tom, Wednesday, 18 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
inside they find Kate/Strokes as desired
Tom, please don't litter your posts with little bon mots like this,
because as I'm scanning the thread, THIS is what immediately jumps out
and gives me a heart attack, instead of intelligent discourse about
magazine covers...
This is precisely the Catch 22 that was the discussion I was having
with the editor of the guitar magazine that I never ended up working
for: Kate sez: why don't you put all these grate FEMALE guitarists in
your magazine? editor sez: because no one has ever heard of them, we
will never sell magazines that way. Kate sez: why do you think no
one's ever heard of them? Cause no one will cover them!
And so on and so forth...
There's a simple response to being offended by fashion mags: don't
read them.
― masonic boom, Wednesday, 18 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I sort of agree in terms of music magazines, ie things need to be
covered and promoted in order to sell, so it's a catch 22. However
fashion mags aren't like that - how many of the skinny, white models
are household names? It's a purely physical thing, unfortunately...
But yes, if it bothers you, don't buy them or buy copies of the ones
who put people you find more appealing on the cover. That'll change
things much more quickly than buying the regular issues and bitching.
― Ally, Wednesday, 18 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
"Canine -style " sex: classic or dud?
― Mike Hanle y, Wednesday, 18 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
five months pass...
Feet, female feet. They're just amazing, a powerful weapon of
seduction. Their design is perfect. You touch the heels and you move
to the soles and to the toes' bases and you feel that you conquested
the world. It's so beautiful... I hate when the people keep so much
the feet out of reach. They're like the second hands, don't forget
that. You must touch them with poetry and sensibility.
― NoName Messenger, Thursday, 10 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
oh i don't think i'll ever forget that.
― ethan, Thursday, 10 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Back on the "why magazines with larger women on cover don't
sell" question, isn't it that most people who actively want different
sizes of women on cover are not really interested in buying said
magazines anyway? (eg. even if
Cosmo's cover-girls were
larger, would that persuade, say, a radical feminist to look past
the fact that the magazine promotes a strongly feminized view of
women and is probably complicit with the patriarchy?)
As Tom pointed out, there's a culture within these magazines of
the body as a consumer good, and (excepting the specific
example he mentioned) it would make no more sense to match
that culture to contradictory covers than it would to put an
overweight man on the front of a Men's Health magazine.
Which is not to excuse the magazines, but rather to say that the
magazine covers are part of a broader culture that would have to
be dismantled first.
― Tim, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I haff figured "skinny girl" phenom out! [Insert entire text of Susan Faludi's "Stiffed"] So what these insecure gents are really trying to find are women whose actual bodies make their dicks look bigger! Pathetic.
I was just asked last weekend what I went for. I stumbled and cast about, I think settling on "eyes and face" or something like that. I've realized that it can be anything - all I need is a pinch in the right direction. Something that makes me go "hnur?"
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
thanks for reviving this, i missed it last time. mark s posts made me
cry laughing.
― Alan Trewartha, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
speaking of intriguing body disparities, how come in cheap junk mail
catalogues in Oz they are allowed to have young females in udnerwear,
swim suits etc, but you don't see any young boys in them, you just
have these swimmers/undies on their own...what's the deal?
― geoff, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
Geoff wishes he could see the kid who plays Harry Potter in a
swimsuit.
― Sean, Friday, 11 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
I'll go along with Paul Strange on this one! The EYES have it for me
as well! Makes me a boring person as well eh?
― Gale Deslongchamps, Saturday, 12 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link
five months pass...
There is nothing like a think girl with pretty feet..
i play with my girlfriend till she's hot and wet..
then i flip her over onto her stomach and i suck on her long pretty
toes and i kiss her soles...
she loves it!
sometimes, i rub my cock against her soles when we're on the
couch and i spew my hot cum all over her toes..
― derrick haltiwanger, Thursday, 13 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
if i had to pick a body part, i'd say noses are good. i like big
noses, on girls and boys. height is not an issue for me, i just like
people with loads of personality.
― queenoftheharpies, Thursday, 13 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
hey I'm a think girl! but that sounds gross.
― maryann, Thursday, 13 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
At least he has the decency to spew hot cum. Imagine if it was cold.
― Ally, Thursday, 13 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
i like internal organs, esp. shaved.
― , Friday, 14 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
teef
― rainy, Friday, 14 June 2002 00:00 (twenty-two years ago) link
five years pass...
the gallblader
― Heave Ho, Friday, 28 September 2007 18:40 (seventeen years ago) link
The gall of some people!
― Michael White, Friday, 28 September 2007 18:43 (seventeen years ago) link
God, I love the stupid puns in A&O. "Petit Bonhomme", "Baba au Rhum", etc...
― Michael White, Friday, 28 September 2007 19:51 (seventeen years ago) link
Left legs
― StanM, Saturday, 29 September 2007 05:50 (seventeen years ago) link
BUM BUM
― max r, Saturday, 29 September 2007 14:14 (seventeen years ago) link
tough one...
but i think eyebrows are important. i also like nice legs. and broad shoulders.
― Rubyredd, Saturday, 29 September 2007 14:23 (seventeen years ago) link
everybody should answer bum, i mean, c'mon stop lying.
― max r, Saturday, 29 September 2007 14:33 (seventeen years ago) link
okay i like bums too
― Rubyredd, Saturday, 29 September 2007 14:53 (seventeen years ago) link
OH MY GOD. I WAS GOING TO POST A PICTURE OF A STREET BUM AND I GIS-ED "BUM" AND I FOUND SOMETHING HORRIFIC AND I WILL NEVER EVER WANT TO LOOK AT A BUTT AGAIN.
― Jesse, Saturday, 29 September 2007 15:09 (seventeen years ago) link
If you're curious, GIS "bum" and look at the 2nd image. It's a bum gone bad. I'm on the verge of tears I think.
― Jesse, Saturday, 29 September 2007 15:10 (seventeen years ago) link
Anyway, now that I'm not an ass man anymore, I have to say that my favorite G-rated part is triceps or forearms or face. My other favorite is the male basket--I'm sometimes surprised by just how detailed a view of their anatomy some men reveal through their clothes.
― Jesse, Saturday, 29 September 2007 15:12 (seventeen years ago) link
stop badmouthing bums
uk style:
bum=ass
tramp=bum
slag=tramp
― max r, Saturday, 29 September 2007 15:12 (seventeen years ago) link
Not just face, btw--LIPS.
― Jesse, Saturday, 29 September 2007 15:12 (seventeen years ago) link
This needs to be a poll.
― Z S, Saturday, 29 September 2007 15:39 (seventeen years ago) link
the kidneys
― PhilK, Saturday, 29 September 2007 16:31 (seventeen years ago) link
Haha.
The goiter!
― Jesse, Saturday, 29 September 2007 16:37 (seventeen years ago) link
Ha, I said the same thing six years ago, I didn't even notice. Except I spelled it wrong.
― Jeff, Saturday, 29 September 2007 16:47 (seventeen years ago) link
The ankle.
What can I say, I grew up among the Amish.
― milo z, Saturday, 29 September 2007 16:53 (seventeen years ago) link
Actually I would like to change my answer. The calves are the winners here.
― Jesse, Sunday, 30 September 2007 08:03 (seventeen years ago) link
Those eyes, that mouth.
― Trayce, Sunday, 30 September 2007 12:10 (seventeen years ago) link
Sexy chin, too.
― StanM, Sunday, 30 September 2007 12:11 (seventeen years ago) link
Calves don't really have much in the way of calves.
― Jesse, Sunday, 30 September 2007 15:10 (seventeen years ago) link
OTM. They should be called Nocalves.
― StanM, Sunday, 30 September 2007 15:11 (seventeen years ago) link
I was researching the etymology of that word, and I found a bodybuilding site with this delightful statement
"I was standing there as Mr. Australia and I was more impressed with these guys calves than I was at my title.
It was then and there I decided I want to have some cows hanging out of my shorts (so I just trained them). "
― Jesse, Sunday, 30 September 2007 15:13 (seventeen years ago) link
OK, so I finally got around to looking for the etymology of the word calf as in calf muscle. There are a couple variations on the root (though all are Norse) but all agree: origin unknown.
:(
― Jesse, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 03:46 (seventeen years ago) link
three years pass...
thighs, esp. big thighs.
― corey, Sunday, 26 June 2011 21:05 (thirteen years ago) link
brain
― mmmm, Sunday, 26 June 2011 21:07 (thirteen years ago) link
all things considered.
― mmmm, Sunday, 26 June 2011 21:08 (thirteen years ago) link
the hat
― ogmor, Sunday, 26 June 2011 22:45 (thirteen years ago) link
I vote legs. Any kind of legs!
― Mount Cleaners, Sunday, 26 June 2011 23:24 (thirteen years ago) link
How does that guided by voices song go? "I'm a thigh man"
― so confused (blank), Monday, 27 June 2011 01:02 (thirteen years ago) link
Natural red hair is the only answer I can come up with. It's just ridiculous. I saw a man who looked like a little hacking egg but he had red hair so I felt feelings that would definitely not have otherwise been felt.
― I'll show you the power of laughter! (Abbbottt), Monday, 27 June 2011 01:04 (thirteen years ago) link
Lorax, have you been away for a while? i hadn't noticed your posts in some time and was all about to ask after you on the milk carton thread
― dell (del), Monday, 27 June 2011 01:29 (thirteen years ago) link
hair, hands, ankles, and face in general i guess.
i dream of tall skinny redheads with gleaming big doe eyes.
― jumpskins, Monday, 27 June 2011 10:03 (thirteen years ago) link
buttcrazytam.jpg
For me face overrides everything. I mean there are certain body parts that I guess I'm drawn to but I would never be attracted to someone whose face I wasn't into no matter how killer their body. If that makes sense. As far as face parts go I'm going to have to say eyes even though that sounds kind of boring.
― \(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Monday, 27 June 2011 11:39 (thirteen years ago) link
btw mark S is a fucking star in the early days of this thread
omg
― \(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Monday, 27 June 2011 15:12 (thirteen years ago) link
hips is a p good answer for women imo
like I said earlier though face trumps all in general
― \(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Monday, 27 June 2011 15:13 (thirteen years ago) link
the harbl
― corey, Monday, 27 June 2011 15:19 (thirteen years ago) link
