Six Feet Under (Rolling Season Five Thread w/ SPOILERS)[now also NSFW]

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
The show returns for its fifth and final season on Monday, June 6th with episode 52, "A Coat Of White Primer."

Who here is psyched? I know that I am.

Apparently something big happens by the middle of this season. Let's just hope that it's better than David getting carjacked.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 8 May 2005 21:52 (twenty years ago)

I'm so over that show.

Jimmy Mod, Sultan of Sexxitime (ModJ), Sunday, 8 May 2005 21:54 (twenty years ago)

I'm not psyched but I will download and watch every episode anyway

Stan Fields (Stan Fields), Sunday, 8 May 2005 22:33 (twenty years ago)

Bastards with TVs...HBO being slow getting the DVDs out...I hate everything!*

*Not really.

Girolamo Savonarola, Sunday, 8 May 2005 22:35 (twenty years ago)

I have a hard time caring after S4. Though maybe someone will finally realize that acting like a dick?‚character development.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Sunday, 8 May 2005 23:01 (twenty years ago)

That should have been a "not equal" symbol. Damn ILX.

Melissa W (Melissa W), Sunday, 8 May 2005 23:10 (twenty years ago)

Melissa W (Melissa W), Sunday, 8 May 2005 23:10 (twenty years ago)

I know what you mean, Melissa. I did like a lot of the "Claire in art school" stuff because I recognized so much of it from my time in art school. Sometimes they go a little over the top, but they pretty much nail it, and it makes me wonder if the writers did a lot of research to get it right.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Sunday, 8 May 2005 23:22 (twenty years ago)

season 4 was awful, no one acted in realistic or even credible ways. hoping season 5 pulls it out.

el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Monday, 9 May 2005 05:15 (twenty years ago)

Oh that's nonsense. I think that some of the more outlandish plotlines (David's carjacking, Nate burying Lisa in the desert, and George's bomb shelter) pushed it a bit, but the more everyday stuff was pretty right on, especially everything having to do with Claire and Ruth.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 9 May 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)

I thought the carjacking scene was a bit over the top until I heard a very very uncannily similar story occurring in Glasgow to a friend of mine. Not the same in crack and gasoline sense, but in a kidnapped>ATMs in various stores>no money left>taken to random abandoned place and nearly murdered way. Apparently the only thing that saved the dude was that he knew the passageway he was headed towards was going to dead end eventually, so he freaked out, cocked the guy in the face and ran away screaming.

Girolamo Savonarola, Monday, 9 May 2005 19:58 (twenty years ago)

Personally, I can't wait.

it's mashed potato time! (dymaxia), Monday, 9 May 2005 22:05 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, it's not so much that he got carjacked (depressingly common) so much as the execution was a little toooooooo much. I do like how that plot kinda hijacked the episode - apparently that's what they wanted, for it to be like a normal episode that suddenly takes a distressing turn. They pulled that off for sure.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 9 May 2005 23:20 (twenty years ago)

The episode immediately following the carjacking ("Terror Begins At Home") is my second favorite episode of the series after "The Opening" from season 3.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 9 May 2005 23:21 (twenty years ago)

Oh that's nonsense.

maybe, but among the people i know who watch the show it was the concensus.

el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Monday, 9 May 2005 23:27 (twenty years ago)

Well, I promise you that all the art school stuff was definitely right on. Olivier is a caricature, sure, but all the stuff with Claire/Edie/Russell/Jimmy/Anita and the classroom scenes with lesbian teacher - totally OTM.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 9 May 2005 23:29 (twenty years ago)

the art-school/Claire stuff was the only good part of last season. She (and her surrounding orbit) has really been the only character to keep me interested over the 2.25 seasons I've seen. Hate to go cliche, but she and her story/plotlines seem somewhat true, emotionally, where the rest are pained surrealism mixed with the-horrible-banality-of-modern-America stuff. Occasionally good but not routinely interesting.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Monday, 9 May 2005 23:34 (twenty years ago)

The absolute worst thing in season 4 is when Rico has that totally awful sexual daydream with the Catholic imagery. Sooooooooooooooooo bad. Really, the entire Rico plotline was awful, but it was good that he ended up leaving his wife and moving in with the Fishers. That should be interesting for season 5 anyway.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 9 May 2005 23:48 (twenty years ago)

Can I just say YAY!!! I'm looking forward to Season 5, and even if 4 was a little over the top, I didn't find it too far beyond belief. I didn't really like the Michell Trachtenberg-as-Britney-Spears plotline though, that was kind of dumb.

VegemiteGrrl (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 10 May 2005 02:00 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I have to agree, the Britney subplot and subsequent affair with Keith was way more beyond the pale than the rest.

I think the only TV I've ever cried at in my life is the end of the first episode of Season 4, with the burial and all. My gf had also just unexpectedly decided to move away, too, so it was a bit about the timing, I suppose. But still gives me the chills.

Girolamo Savonarola, Tuesday, 10 May 2005 02:17 (twenty years ago)

four weeks pass...
this was alright. the Rico stuff is boring thought.

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 05:38 (twenty years ago)

er, "though".

still, it does feel like the show needs to come to an end, doesn't it?

kyle (akmonday), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 05:39 (twenty years ago)

i liked last night a lot more than anything from last season, which was way way more "D" than "C".

PeopleFunnyBoy (PeopleFunnyBoy), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 13:25 (twenty years ago)

three weeks pass...
this week's episode as excellent.

Also, they're moving it back to SUndays, since apparently no-one is watching it this year

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 29 June 2005 18:58 (nineteen years ago)

Re-reading the earlier parts of the thread reminded me of how awful last season really was (and how much better this season is - and it seems to be getting even better).
The art school stuff was often preposterous - Claire's infatuation with Mena Suvari was ridiculous. Claire seems to be 3 or 4 different characters, depending on who wrote the episode.

But, yeah, this week's was great. The scene between Billy and George on the front stoop was somehow really moving.

Also, I can't get over my sudden fixation with Ileana Douglas after her cameo 2 eps ago. Jesus. So hot.

On a Strict El Cholo Diet (Bent Over at the Arclight), Thursday, 30 June 2005 05:31 (nineteen years ago)

haha she was great! Funyons! "Now we can both fart!"

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 30 June 2005 05:48 (nineteen years ago)

The art school stuff was often preposterous - Claire's infatuation with Mena Suvari was ridiculous. Claire seems to be 3 or 4 different characters, depending on who wrote the episode.

exactly. OTM about everything in that post, actually, esp. ileana douglas.

el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Thursday, 30 June 2005 06:41 (nineteen years ago)

two weeks pass...
this season has been very good. there isn't much left of it though and I'm worried about what they're going to do with Nate and Maggie, that seems very rushed. She's cute and nice though.

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 05:30 (nineteen years ago)

Does anyone know whats happening with the availability of downloadable season 5 episodes? Apparently numerous fake and/or corrupted versions of the first few episodes have been circulating to try to prevent people from downloading and now I can't seem to find episode 7 anywhere, even though it originally aired on Sunday.

I would watch it on HBO if I could, of course.

Stan Fields (Stan Fields), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 21:35 (nineteen years ago)

it seems that no-one is watching it this season, you'd think hbo would be happy people are bothering at all....although they'll undoubtedly blame lack of viewers on the internet (and not their complete lack of publicity about this season)

kyle (akmonday), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 21:39 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe even the TV-rip groups have stopped watching it

Stan Fields (Stan Fields), Wednesday, 20 July 2005 22:00 (nineteen years ago)

HOLY SHIT

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:12 (nineteen years ago)

I really wish I had HBO. I've been reading the recaps on TWOP and it just can't compare. It sounds like it's been great this season.

Candicissima (candicissima), Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:25 (nineteen years ago)

i don't know if it's been great but it's been better than usual.

kyle (akmonday), Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:28 (nineteen years ago)

i think its been great, that last episode was fucking intense.

cutty (mcutt), Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:30 (nineteen years ago)

"you can kill a man with a chopstick"

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:37 (nineteen years ago)

I don't know, I think the quality has actually been fairly consistent from season 3 onward, aside from a few duds. I'm always going to be partial to the mid-period of this show.

But yeah, "Singing For Our Lives" is an instant classic. I'm excited to see how the final four are going to go down. Should be pretty intense.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 28 July 2005 13:56 (nineteen years ago)

I really really really disagree with people about Claire. I think half the point of the character is that she kinda flits around in search of herself, and the frustration comes from when she retreats back to acting like a bratty self-involved kid after showing herself to be a pretty amazing adult when she wants to be. I find it hard to imagine that none of you have ever met people like that!

The storyline with Mena Suvari was pretty right on and realistic, esp. when Claire had to realize that she just couldn't commit to anything beyond a surface flirtation with bisexuality.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:00 (nineteen years ago)

I mean, really, if any of you have been to art school in the past ten years, I can't imagine how you'd think the stuff there was even remotely "preposterous." Some bits were exaggerated for dramatic effect, but they nailed so many details and character types, I find it amazing that the entire writing staff are not art school graduates.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 28 July 2005 14:02 (nineteen years ago)

so next week should be pretty fucking emotional

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 1 August 2005 00:56 (nineteen years ago)

I was really hoping moms was going to get eaten by a cougar.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Monday, 1 August 2005 03:55 (nineteen years ago)

so did i!

this season has been so good.

el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Monday, 1 August 2005 04:10 (nineteen years ago)

when can we start talking about the last episode? because i just really need to scream FUCK over and over until someone else tells me they saw it.

el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Monday, 1 August 2005 11:36 (nineteen years ago)

I saw it... just when Six Feet Under was getting REALLY FUN again to watch, they go and throw an emotional monkeywrench in there and now I fear it will be unbearably depressing till the end of season and well into the next. It's always been an emotional trainwreck, but it was somehow light enough to be hilarious this whole season. That's the reason this season has been so great.

He Who Can Not Be Named, Monday, 1 August 2005 17:46 (nineteen years ago)

Also, do you think there is some *message* they are trying to deliver with the show? It is about death and it seems to perpetually be about the death of situations as well. Change, renewal and that sort of shit.

He Who Can Not Be Named, Monday, 1 August 2005 17:52 (nineteen years ago)

Isn't this the last season???

Also, I really liked how they managed to tie up a few things there.

mcd (mcd), Monday, 1 August 2005 17:59 (nineteen years ago)

NO way. That sucks. I was just getting into it.

He Who Can Not Be Named, Monday, 1 August 2005 19:33 (nineteen years ago)

Also, do you think there is some *message* they are trying to deliver with the show? It is about death and it seems to perpetually be about the death of situations as well. Change, renewal and that sort of shit.

are you new to the show?

and yes, this is the last season.

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 1 August 2005 19:56 (nineteen years ago)

At least it washed out the bad memory of "Narm!" from my head. Loved stoner boy David in the van. I think I went to high school with him.

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 1 August 2005 20:00 (nineteen years ago)

are you new to the show?

Not really, I didn't watch it for one season and I didn't really like it until this season. Lots of shows have drama and bad shit happen, like Desperate Housewives for instance, but this one had a very obvious method of creating a comfortable situation and then destroying it and creating something new out of it.

Hopefully there will be many more episodes of this last season.

He Who Can Not Be Named, Monday, 1 August 2005 21:00 (nineteen years ago)

... and, so what is the message, then, Kyle? Shit happens?

He Who Can Not Be Named, Monday, 1 August 2005 21:02 (nineteen years ago)

Aren't there only two or three left?

M. White (Miguelito), Monday, 1 August 2005 21:20 (nineteen years ago)

Still the most frustrating show on television - for every good moment or scene, there's drawn-out, stilted (often pseudo-surreal) dialogue. The mother is the worst for this - Nate and Claire (and their cadres) are usually the only characters that resemble actual people. The rest just seems very white-elephant to me.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Monday, 1 August 2005 21:42 (nineteen years ago)

that episode was fucking insane. whew.

cutty (mcutt), Monday, 1 August 2005 22:21 (nineteen years ago)


SPOILERS FOLLOW

I liked this episode, but my aggravation with Nate has reached such an insane high that I was almost glad he died. Breaking up with your pregnant wife from your hospital bed, with your daughter in the room, right after she's spent the entire night in the hospital worrying about whether or not you'd be OK = instant fucking douchebag classic. So, yeah, I can't say I was exactly mourning his departure.

I do love Claire & David this season, tho.

PeopleFunnyBoy (PeopleFunnyBoy), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 02:29 (nineteen years ago)

Nate and Claire (and their cadres) are usually the only characters that resemble actual people.

Bullshit. I don't know who you know, but I assure you that there are most certainly a lot of people like Ruth and David and Rico in this world. Fuck, I relate to David quite a bit. God, what a horrifying world if everyone was as self-centered and narcissistic as Claire and Nate!

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 02:34 (nineteen years ago)

Hopefully there will be many more episodes of this last season.

Sorry, but there only three more left, and the final episode apparently takes place mostly in the future.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 02:36 (nineteen years ago)

Table of contents:

01 A Coat of White Primer
02 Dancing For Me
03 Hold My Hand
04 Time Flies
05 Eat A Peach
06 The Rainbow of Her Reasons
07 The Silence
08 Singing For Our Lives
09 Ecotone
10 All Alone
11 Static
12 Everyone's Waiting

We just saw "Ecotone" on Sunday.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 02:38 (nineteen years ago)

Ruth (for at least the last two seasons) has just been once forcibly wacky thing after another. Her whole plotline for this last episode was just unwatchable. I stopped caring about David's character with the hijacking and biting.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 02:39 (nineteen years ago)


this "future" episode intrigues me. i've been steering clear of spoilers, so i didnt know this was what they had planned.

PeopleFunnyBoy (PeopleFunnyBoy), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 02:41 (nineteen years ago)


what's with all this david-hating? i love that guy.

PeopleFunnyBoy (PeopleFunnyBoy), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 02:41 (nineteen years ago)

my problem is less with the characters themselves (Ruth's the only dislikable one), but with they speak and the situations they're placed in.

I feel bad hating on the likable little old lady.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 02:43 (nineteen years ago)

They're all great actors.

He Who Can Not Be Named, Tuesday, 2 August 2005 03:03 (nineteen years ago)

nate's whole "man, i am so fucking wise and in touch" act bugged the shit out of me more than anything david's done. at the end i turned to my gf and said, "well, at least he died the way he lived. being a selfish, smug asshole."

el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 03:10 (nineteen years ago)

i haven't bothered watching all season. as far as I'm concerned it's never gonna get as good as when David smoked crack. i'm glad nate's dead though, lol fuck that fag

LOCKER ROOM TOWEL FIGHT: THE BLINDING OF LARRY DRISCOLL (Adrian Langston), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 03:54 (nineteen years ago)

I genuinely cannot comprehend how a frustrated woman who had been cautious about every little thing in her life for over 60 years suddenly deciding to be impulsive and marrying the first good man who comes along without knowing him very well and having that totally backfire when she finds out about his horrible secret and then ending up back where she started - taking care of another person 24/7 - is "wacky" or at all unrealistic. Ruth's storyline is very simple - she's a codependent person who is trying to find a path in which she is not subserviant to a man, but also fighting her impulse to do just that. That's why this last episode was such a big deal for her - she had the strength to tell Hiram to fuck off, and came to the realization that all the men in her life were all kind of ridiculous and the same, even Nathanial.

Please, watch the show in CONTEXT before you start saying that it's ridiculous.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 12:51 (nineteen years ago)

as far as I'm concerned it's never gonna get as good as when David smoked crack

they referenced this in the last episode!

cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 12:57 (nineteen years ago)

Seriously, please give me an example of anything "wacky" that Ruth has done aside from her weird quasi-affair with Arthur.

In seasons four and five she has:

Adjusted to married life with George, slowly realizing that she made a horrible mistake as his behavior became gradually more insensitive and erratic. She kept trying to reach out to him and learn more about his family and past, but he kept pushing her away. He eventually slips into full-on paranoid schizophrenia, and he gets the the electroshock therapy, and she takes care of him. Her resentment for being put in the situation of being responsible for him grows and grows until their relationship totally collapses and she leaves him. (In the meantime her relationship with Claire is in bad shape, mainly because Ruth is terrified that she will make some of the same mistakes that she has.)

Following the break up, she finds out that George already has a new fiance and she tries to tell that woman the truth about George. She kinda freaks out, but why the hell not? She bonds with her sister and her female friends, but takes the whole "let's form a commune for women!" thing too seriously. She tries to go out and date and mingle at a party, but feels old and silly and out of place and humiliates herself. She decides to revisit Hiram, but that goes badly.

Wacky?

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 13:00 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I think the show is incredibly realistic. But, maybe some of us live more sheltered lives than others?

nate's whole "man, i am so fucking wise and in touch"

He was being honest with his feelings. You must be the most uptight motherfucker around.

well, at least he died the way he lived. being a selfish, smug asshole.

And Nate a selfish asshole? Take a look at who he's been with. They were all much worse, including Brenda. I looked at my gf when Nate told Brenda he was done with her and we both went, "Yay!" with big smiles on our faces.

He Who Can Not Be Named, Tuesday, 2 August 2005 13:33 (nineteen years ago)

I looked at my gf when Nate told Brenda he was done with her and we both went, "Yay!" with big smiles on our faces.

I don't disagree that Brenda was awful, but I think my aggravation with Nate stems from the way he goes about things. I feel like he has a pattern of getting something he thinks will make him happy, then becoming almost immediately dissatisfied with that one thing and convincing himself something better is out there without ever trying to work to improve the situation he's in. His pattern is that when things get tough, he bolts. I don't get the sense that his character has any understanding of the idea that life is difficult, relationships take work, and the godlike "peace" ideal isn't something you discover, it's something you work to create.

He gave his marriage all of 1.5 episodes before he decided it wasn't working out, and the only reason he came to that conclusion was because he decided that if only he was with Maggie, then surely he would be happy. I get aggravated because I know so many 'Nate's -- always convinced that their unhappiness is caused by someone else, always bailing at the first sign of trouble, and always leaping with their full soul at the next shiny thing they're convinced is going to make them happy -- whether it's marriage, or Quakerism, or living on an organic food commune.

I can't determine if this is intentional -- if the character is deliberately written this way -- or if everyone involved with the show is also this myopic, onanistic and self-centered.

PeopleFunnyBoy (PeopleFunnyBoy), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 13:39 (nineteen years ago)

Brenda is a very flawed person, but she grew up. She has a very well developed sense of responsibility now, and understands that she has to sometimes put her needs aside for the benefit of the people that she loves. Nate did not have this at all - his entire life has always been about him running away from any responsibility, and chasing this impossible idea of freedom and "peace" that basically amounts to Nate doing whatever the hell he wants and never having to be questioned or deal with the consequences. So yeah, Nate is an incredibly selfish person, and he was never going to change.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 13:46 (nineteen years ago)

My feeling is that Nate is deliberately written to be this way, and that Alan Ball and the writers were interested in creating a realistic portrait of a type of person that most everyone has met. I think that's the case with all of the central characters, really.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 13:49 (nineteen years ago)

uh, PFB (and Matthew) making the point i would've tried to, but better.

He was being honest with his feelings. You must be the most uptight motherfucker around.

sounds like something nate would say, actually.

el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 13:52 (nineteen years ago)

i don't think that is the last we'll see of nate, anyway. he'll be popping up int he next three episodes to bother everyone, i'm sure.

cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 13:58 (nineteen years ago)

Nah, Nate made a mistake marrying Brenda who DID always want to argue and DID always want to win those arguments. She's a fucking self-centered bitch. She was driving her coworkers nuts for fuck's sake!

Nate's first wife was having an affair with her brother-in-law and was murdered... You don't think that would be a head trip to live with, as you raise the daughter of that union. After you've had your head explode and disoriented for a while? Sucked back into your hometown doing a job you never wanted?

No, Nate was confused and getting better by being honest with his feelings. He made the mistake of trusting and caring for selfish people. And in the end, he decided it was important to put himself and his daughter's happiness first. Good for him.

He Who Can Not Be Named, Tuesday, 2 August 2005 14:12 (nineteen years ago)

nate died happy! he was at peace with himself. selfish or not, he's dead and he said what he wanted to say to everyone. not everyone gets that opportunity.

cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 14:18 (nineteen years ago)

Oh please. No one on the series was ever nearly as consumed by selfishness and narcissism as much as Nate. (Even Tony Soprano is less selfish and narcissistic than Nate!) Brenda and Claire sometimes, but they would always cycle back to responsibility and maturity before too long. Lisa was extremely passive aggressive and deeply insecure, but selfish isn't really a good word to describe her character.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 14:39 (nineteen years ago)

Oh please. Sleeping with your sister's husband is selfish. This lack of judgement on your part throws your whole perception into question. Brenda cheated, cheated, cheated just as much as Nate and overall has a much more self-centered attitude. Nate went out of his way to make Lisa and Brenda happy, as well as his mother, brother and sister. And he rejected Brenda's fucked up brother for the safety of the ones he loved.

He Who Can Not Be Named, Tuesday, 2 August 2005 14:51 (nineteen years ago)

it's the fourth best drama on hbo! no need to get this worked up people!

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 15:41 (nineteen years ago)

Well, actually, Lisa's relationship with Hoyt was almost entirely before she married Nate, and she was breaking it off with him so that she could fully commit to her child and husband.

There isn't anyone on Six Feet Under who isn't flawed, and interestingly, not a single central character who hasn't cheated. But in terms of relativity, Nate is the one who rarely had moments of maturity, much less selflessness, and everyone else has. He's by far the most selfish and immature character.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:02 (nineteen years ago)

I'm seriously drawing a blank as to when Nate ever went "out of his way" to make anyone else happy, especially without a) getting something out of it himself or b) whining about it and pulling a martyr act later on. One of the kindest things he ever does in the whole series is coming back to working full time after David is attacked, and it's only because Claire guilts him into it.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:04 (nineteen years ago)

how's about when he gave up his life in seattle to stay in l.a. and do the one thing he'd swore he'd never do?

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:07 (nineteen years ago)

and that time he ate brenda out in the living room

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:08 (nineteen years ago)

I haven't watched the show at all this season but I did watch about 85% of the previous 4 seasons and I'm kind of wondering what show He Who Can Not Be Named was watching if He thinks that Nate wasn't a character study in arrested development/narcissistic self-loving douchebaggery.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:08 (nineteen years ago)

Nate's character, if you didn't notice, was always accused of things he didn't do by manipulative, self-centered twats who drove him to do the things he did. He then followed through and did what he was being accused of. He was selfish, but the people he was with were always worse and continued to get worse while he got better, even after having all hell break loose on his world. He was mostly guilty of being confused about what he wanted, but so was every person he was involved with.

He Who Can Not Be Named, Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:21 (nineteen years ago)

i think they wanted it to appear that nate had attained some wisdom, some sorta peace before he died but they'd sabotaged themselves previously by making nate so, um, human i guess - you couldn't really show short-term epiphany and expect the viewer to buy it at this point (anyone here think he wouldn't eventually feel trapped or bored with maggie?)(hasn't ruth 'figured out' a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle a few times already?). david's shown real growth i guess sorta, claire's progress i've bought basically but only cuz her character is a teenager-into-early twenties so relapses into immaturity, sudden fullblown obnoxiousness, fooling around, swings between thinking you know everything to you know nothing make perfect sense for her. nate was the center of the show though (the only other character i could even see an argument for is david), and smug or philandering or pissy i still liked him.

xpost haha he who can't be named is pretty funny

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:23 (nineteen years ago)

Ah, he's watching "Bizarro Six Feet Under". Got it.

(Agreed that Nate was the center of the show and agreed that he was more likeable than not, but he really was all about himself in a way that not even Claire could match.)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:24 (nineteen years ago)

one hunch i had after last week and looking at future episode synopsi that thankfully didn't bear fruit was i thought they might drop a lil schiavo stylee, have a plug pulling moment. i'm somewhat wondering where the drama's gonna come from now - things felt weirdly resolved this week, it would've worked as last episode in a way.

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:28 (nineteen years ago)

i mean my favorite hbo character of all time is either adebisi on oz or omar on the wire and nate's nowhere near as, uh, flawed as them!

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:31 (nineteen years ago)

"I haven't watched the show at all this season"

"Agreed that Nate was the center of the show and agreed that he was more likeable than not, but he really was all about himself in a way that not even Claire could match."

Cite some points about why Nate was so much worse than everyone else. I've cited my reasons. All you've done is reaffirm your opinion. Lisa, Brenda, Claire, Brenda's bro (name escapes me at the moment), her mom, her lovers, Claire's friends, Claire's teacher, George, Ricoh (especially this season) have all shown themselves to be just as bad or much worse than Nate. Nate never tricked woman after woman into marrying him knowing full well he was schizophrenic. Nate never fucked David's wife. Nate never acted like half the selfish twat Claire has shown her to be, although perhaps when he was her age he was worse, it's hard to know for sure. Nate got involved with some very fucked up people who were very trying to deal with.

He Who Can Not Be Named, Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:32 (nineteen years ago)

Nate never fucked David's wife.

Nice safe datapoint there.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:34 (nineteen years ago)

he's got you there dan!

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:36 (nineteen years ago)

how did this thread get a googler this fast???

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:37 (nineteen years ago)

it's sad that nate will never smoke a doobie again.

cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:37 (nineteen years ago)

and who spells rico with an 'h'?

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:38 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.ricoh.nl/Binary/ani-logo_tcm69-4965.gif

Nice safe datapoint, eh? I'm still waiting for one datapoint from you.

He Who Can Not Be Named, Tuesday, 2 August 2005 16:40 (nineteen years ago)

All throughout the first season, Nate stomps around the funeral home like a petulant little brat who has had his ball taken away, completely ignoring his mother's grief, his brother's resentment at having to stay after Nate took off and his sister's growing sense of abandonment and detachment from the rest of the family.

Nate's total self-involvement with having to move back from Seattle to help with the family business helps isolate Brenda, which feeds into her loneliness and sex addiction.

All throughout the series, Nate is a complete and total tool to Frederico whenever the subject of partnership in the business comes up, even though Rico's been there working his ass off to keep the business afloat longer than Nate has.

Billy is completely totally nuts, so okay Nate can't be more self-involved than him. YOU WIN.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 17:01 (nineteen years ago)

Paragraph 1: typical family shit. I didn't stay home to take care of my parents, did you? I don't know anyone who has so far in my life's journey....

Paragraph 2: typical family shit, yet here he's trying to "do the right thing" and yet it's used against him in paragraph 1 and also from another angle here. I guess he should've not tried to help the family (but then you would've called him selfish).

Paragraph 3: Nate was protecting the family business, which is not a complete and total tool move. Rico was being a tool as well.

He Who Could Not Be Named, Tuesday, 2 August 2005 17:48 (nineteen years ago)

Dude, I already said that you win. You can take your blankey and go outside and play now.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 17:52 (nineteen years ago)

Dude would be happier over on Television Without Pity. Their rhetorical style is more copacetic.

Leon C. (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 17:56 (nineteen years ago)

why the sellout on 'ricoh'?

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 18:00 (nineteen years ago)

I just like to argue. If I'm not arguing, I haven't "won."

He Who Could Not Be Named, Tuesday, 2 August 2005 18:44 (nineteen years ago)

No shit, you like to argue? I never would have guessed!

The Ghost of The String Of "NUH-UH!" Posts Wasn't A Big Fucking Clue Or Anything, Tuesday, 2 August 2005 18:49 (nineteen years ago)

worst googler ever!

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 18:54 (nineteen years ago)

Googler? Man are you stupid or what? No name = same guy every time for years now.

Just a googler, Tuesday, 2 August 2005 19:20 (nineteen years ago)

why the sellout on 'ricoh'?

typoh

He Who Could Not Be Named, Tuesday, 2 August 2005 20:00 (nineteen years ago)

these googlers suck!

j blount (papa la bas), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 20:03 (nineteen years ago)

I disagree.

Googler #1, Tuesday, 2 August 2005 20:47 (nineteen years ago)

I agree with Googler #1.

Googler #2, Tuesday, 2 August 2005 20:48 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.madlassgrin.co.uk/images/killthread.gif

The Original Jimmy Mod (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 20:50 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.ibiblio.org/Dave/Dr-Fun/df9612/df961217.jpg

The Prototype For The Original Jimmy Mod, Tuesday, 2 August 2005 21:16 (nineteen years ago)

Nate's character, if you didn't notice, was always accused of things he didn't do by manipulative, self-centered twats who drove him to do the things he did.

Projection:

Psychology.

The attribution of one's own attitudes, feelings, or suppositions to others: “Even trained anthropologists have been guilty of unconscious projection of clothing the subjects of their research in theories brought with them into the field” (Alex Shoumatoff).

The attribution of one's own attitudes, feelings, or desires to someone or something as a naive or unconscious defense against anxiety or guilt.

el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 00:39 (nineteen years ago)

blah blah blah come up with an original insult and remember your end tag next time.

Or, in the spirit of another ILXor:

Oh boy, a dictionary!

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

He Who He Just Can Not Be Named, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 01:16 (nineteen years ago)

I just get the sense that He Who Cannot Be Named is a douchebag in the same mold of Nate, and hates to be criticized even by proxy. That, and kind of a misogynistic creep.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:09 (nineteen years ago)

I'm getting the sense that Matthew C Perpetua is a misandrist creep. Calling a guy a douchebag like that. That and a hollowbody numbskull with a weak attack.

He Who Just Won't... etc., Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:19 (nineteen years ago)

Ricoh (especially this season) have all shown themselves to be just as bad or much worse than Nate.

This is such bullshit! Rico can be buffoonish, but his first interest is consistently to help his family and his business. The guy is intensely loyal, and had his whole family life fucked by the one time he wasn't. Unlike Nate, however, he was genuinely guilty about what he did, and has worked very hard to earn the forgiveness of Vanessa. Rico's not a perfect guy, but he's definitely a good person for the most part, full of love for his family and friends. If anything, he's the total opposite of Nate - he has a very specific morality and lives for the benefit of others, often at his own expense. (He's more like David and Ruth in this way.)

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:20 (nineteen years ago)

Rico went and bullshitted up the principal to manipulate himself back into his ex-wives life. He's a little shit.

He who don't..., Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:25 (nineteen years ago)

ex-wife's... yes I know.

bah, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:27 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, but his motivation was to get his family back together, not to humiliate Vanessa. He's clumsy and a bit of a dumbass, but his aim is true.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:27 (nineteen years ago)

While it's true that Rico's methods there were really badly thought out and inconsiderate, it's just another example of him going out of his way to get MORE responsibility. When has Nate ever tried to do anything but dodge responsibility? The only time he ever accepts any is when he's guilted into it.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:30 (nineteen years ago)

separated...whatever!

Come on, Rico was a little fuck. His wife's having major depression issues, so he starts seeing a girl on the side? It took him long enough to really feel guilty about it, didn't it? And then, he played the big macho bullshit with her about it being "his house" and "his kids" and "I don't like you going out with other people" and all this bullshit. Nate would've never pulled that crap. And Nate would've acted like the little lying weasel to manipulate Vanessa back into his life like Rico did. Because Nate's "in touch" with his feelings, "bro."

gah, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:31 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I'm not saying that's not bad stuff about Rico, but dude, Nate never pulled that stuff because the last thing he'd ever want is responsibility. However, trying to make Nate out to be even remotely honest, esp. about infidelity, is pretty rich!

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:33 (nineteen years ago)

Also, I guess you missed the part about Rico having the latino machismo thing shoved directly up his ass. It's not about him wanting more responsibility, it's all about what a man should have. And a man should be the boss of his wife and the king of the castle even if he fucked up and she doesn't want him there. I suppose you think that bullshit about Rico flipping out on Nate for his innocent comment about the latino family going broke on an expensive casket was not totally uncalled for. Hey, guess what? Nate was trying to help a poor family out! Rico was trying to sell them the most expensive shit he could because "We're latino's, we don't go broke. Every person pitches in at times like these."

Heyah, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:36 (nineteen years ago)

Also, let's look at Rico's relationship with the stripper - he meets her, and gets a blowjob. He feels weird about, so he strikes up a friendship. Before too long, he's supporting her financially and giving her help with her kid and playing a sugar daddy sort of role. All the while, he is not having any kind of sexual relationship. He only fucks her after Vanessa finds out and he freaks out. Rico's idea of an affair is taking on more responsibility!

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:36 (nineteen years ago)

See last comment. Rico is a little fucking boy trying to be big latino man. He liked his ego stroked by the stripper and that is why he took care of her and then she was all he had after Vanessa left him.

I disagree about the stripper, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:40 (nineteen years ago)

Well, Rico is also the only partner trying to keep the business afloat - Nate's too prissy and selfrighteous to entertain the notion that selling product doesn't have to be a bad or manipulative thing, especially if the customer WANTS the high end products. From Nate's point of view, he was trying to be nice, but really he was just being very condescending and very white-privileged-liberal, and Rico was totally in the right to snap at him. Nate doesn't have to worry about money, but Rico does. Nate doesn't have to worry about the future of the company, or its place in the community, but Rico does.

My friend and I were talking about Rico the other night, and it's kinda icky how virtually all of Rico's major flaws seem to be attributed to his culture and upbringing. But then again, a lot of the best things about him happen to be in contrast to the liberal white privelege of the Fishers.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:43 (nineteen years ago)

you guys.

cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:44 (nineteen years ago)

Nope, they've done that plenty of times on the show before where they've showed them offering cheap options. You're right: David and Nate aren't comfortable about the business and seem to be more concerned about the families, whereas Rico constantly jokes about the dead people and the money!

Oh yeah! Did you forget that? Rico doesn't seem to give a shit about the people. What about the scene with Nate's first fuck lying on the mortuary table and Rico says, "How's she holding up?" to Nate? Cool?

The way the latino casket scene happened, it just sounded like Nate was saying, "Jesus, the regular expensive casket wasn't good enough, you had to charge them an extra $300 to switch the handles?" Remember, Nate didn't know what the fuck they were saying because they were speaking Spanish, so how does he know Rico isn't just trying to sell them the most expensive stuff?

Rico totally turned it around in an instant. It's hard to tell from a script, but the way the scene was acted, it just sounded like Nate was mindlessly responding without really thinking about what race the people were. His comment was directed more toward the fact that everything was the best of the best. "We take care of our family" "Yeah and go broke doing it" ... same shit I've heard in a dozen other circumstances. It's just a comment about wasting money, not about how poor latinos are.

I disagree about the casket options, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 02:53 (nineteen years ago)

I like how white people always play the "That wasn't racist, it was just really assholish!" card.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 04:36 (nineteen years ago)

White people be assholes.

Rickey Wright (Rrrickey), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 05:54 (nineteen years ago)

WHITE PEOPLE!

(you're killing yourselves...)

el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 07:24 (nineteen years ago)


I like how white people always play the "That wasn't racist, it was just really assholish!" card.

That wasn't the card I was playing at all because I don't think Nate was being assholish in the least. Just Rico.

Or perhaps you have never heard the following:

"A car in the city? You'll go broke on parking alone... or parking tickets!"

"Can't smoke anymore, you'll go broke."

Ghost of Dan Perry's Brain (which is dead), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 13:59 (nineteen years ago)

But I do love it when people play the "playing the card" card. So transparently manipulative.

Perry Whirling Hall of Braindead, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:02 (nineteen years ago)

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/jenniferoria/c-a-c-k.gif

Right here, baby.

The Original Jimmy Mod (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:06 (nineteen years ago)

Hmm, very jocky of you.

Picture... wow, brilliant., Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:08 (nineteen years ago)

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/jenniferoria/c-a-c-k.gif

Right here, baby.

The Original Jimmy Mod (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:10 (nineteen years ago)

Hmm, very jocky of you.

-- Picture... wow, brilliant. (jock...), August 3rd, 2005.

Picture... wow, brilliant., Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:11 (nineteen years ago)

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/jenniferoria/c-a-c-k.gif

Right here, baby.

The Original Jimmy Mod (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:12 (nineteen years ago)

Hmm, very jocky of you. I like the guy's hand on the far right best.

What are you trying to say, anyway? Is sucking cock bad, wrong and insulting?

-- Picture... wow, brilliant. (jock...), August 3rd, 2005., Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:20 (nineteen years ago)

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/jenniferoria/c-a-c-k.gif

Right here, baby.

The Original Jimmy Mod (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:21 (nineteen years ago)

http://media.mth.net/jimmy_fr/v3/images/series/six_feet_under/perso_300_210/david.jpg

Thank you, sir. May I have another?

Picture... wow, brilliant., Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:25 (nineteen years ago)

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/jenniferoria/c-a-c-k.gif

Right here, baby.

The Original Jimmy Mod (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:26 (nineteen years ago)

http://media.mth.net/jimmy_fr/v3/images/series/six_feet_under/perso_300_210/david.jpg

Thank you, sir. May I have another?

tee hee, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:28 (nineteen years ago)

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/jenniferoria/c-a-c-k.gif

Right here, baby.

The Original Jimmy Mod (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:30 (nineteen years ago)

http://media.mth.net/jimmy_fr/v3/images/series/six_feet_under/perso_300_210/david.jpg

Thank you, sir. May I have another?

do, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:32 (nineteen years ago)

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/jenniferoria/c-a-c-k.gif

Right here, baby.

The Original Jimmy Mod (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:34 (nineteen years ago)

http://media.mth.net/jimmy_fr/v3/images/series/six_feet_under/perso_300_210/david.jpg

Thank you, sir. May I have another?

joye, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:47 (nineteen years ago)

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/jenniferoria/c-a-c-k.gif

Right here, baby.

The Original Jimmy Mod (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:50 (nineteen years ago)

http://media.mth.net/jimmy_fr/v3/images/series/six_feet_under/perso_300_210/david.jpg

Thank you, sir. May I have another?

zbra, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 14:51 (nineteen years ago)

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/jenniferoria/c-a-c-k.gif

Right here, baby.

The Original Jimmy Mod (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 15:03 (nineteen years ago)

http://media.mth.net/jimmy_fr/v3/images/series/six_feet_under/perso_300_210/david.jpg

Thank you, sir. May I have another?

Mmm, I think I'm going to get a hot dog for lunch, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 15:11 (nineteen years ago)

worst googler ever!

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 16:54 (nineteen years ago)

He should have asked for hair dye tips instead, that would have been less annoying.

Leon C. (Ex Leon), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 16:56 (nineteen years ago)

http://media.mth.net/jimmy_fr/v3/images/series/six_feet_under/perso_300_210/david.jpg

Could I have some hair dye tips?

Worst "Googler" Ever, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 17:18 (nineteen years ago)

http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a164/jenniferoria/c-a-c-k.gif

Right here, baby.

The Original Jimmy Mod (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 19:19 (nineteen years ago)

http://media.mth.net/jimmy_fr/v3/images/series/six_feet_under/perso_300_210/david.jpg

Thank you, sir. May I have another?

That guy on the right looks like my in-law, Wednesday, 3 August 2005 22:10 (nineteen years ago)

WHITE PEOPLE!

(you're killing yourselves...)

wonder showzen!

cutty (mcutt), Wednesday, 3 August 2005 22:15 (nineteen years ago)

Great episode, though it makes me wish the hippie-stoner sister (Clarkson) was on it more than Ruth.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Monday, 8 August 2005 04:16 (nineteen years ago)

That episode was easily one of the top 5 best episodes of the series. I felt gutted the whole time.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Monday, 8 August 2005 11:56 (nineteen years ago)

two months pass...
I just finished watching the last episode. I'm not sure if the ending was great or trite...probably the latter. I'm really going to miss this show though. The first two seasons are probably the best thing that has ever been shown on tv. And I dont think I've ever cared as much for charachters on tv as the ones on this show.

Fuck you Alan Ball for cancelling the show! Could you perhaps consider a spin off with Olivier and Brenda's mom?

Lovelace (Lovelace), Saturday, 8 October 2005 23:08 (nineteen years ago)

It would obviously be a sitcom.

Lovelace (Lovelace), Saturday, 8 October 2005 23:13 (nineteen years ago)

'Dexter' builds case
Hall to play serial killer in pilot

By DENISE MARTIN
advertisement


Michael C. Hall
Hall

Related
Hot Topic: Pilot Watch

Exclusives Around This Date

Jazz fantasy a new stage for director
8/7/05 10:00pm

Helmer playing the 'Blues'
8/7/05 10:00pm

'Hell's Kitchen' back for seconds at Fox
8/7/05 10:00pm

'Land' ho for producers
8/7/05 10:00pm

Riding the current
8/7/05 10:00pm

Pic partners bridge 'Gap'
8/7/05 10:00pm

'James' killer in WB sights
8/7/05 10:00pm

Olson pitch shows up on Radar
8/7/05 10:00pm

Film Jobs

Publisherr, Los Angeles, CA United States
Reed Business Information

Anchorr, Mobile, AL
WPMI-TV

SENIOR BROADCAST FACILITY COORDINATOR (Palm Beach Countyy, FL, Channel 20), West Palm Beach, FL
Palm Beach County Human Resources

More film jobs
powered byvarietycareers.com

BOX OFFICE TOP TEN
Sponsored by:
Weekly: Sep. 30 - Oct. 6, 2005
* in millions
1 Flightplan
$19.0
2 Serenity
$12.7
3 Tim Burton's Corpse Bride
$12.4
4 A History of Violence
$10.8
5 Into the Blue
$9.1

6 Just Like Heaven
$7.9
7 The Exorcism of Emily Rose
$5.6
8 The Greatest Game Ever Played
$4.8
9 Roll Bounce
$4.7
10 The 40 Year Old Virgin
$4.2
view full chart view box office news
Showtime has signed "Six Feet Under""Six Feet Under" thesp Michael C. Hall to star in the series pilot "Dexter."

Paybox entertainment chief Robert GreenblattRobert Greenblatt also has recruited "Six Feet" helmer Michael CuestaMichael Cuesta to direct the project, one of four hourlong pilots Showtime ordered in June.

Hall will play Dexter Morgan, a Miami Police Dept. forensics expert who moonlights as a serial killer -- murdering only guilty parties. Based on the Jeff Lindsay novel "Darkly Dreaming Dexter," series comes from scribe James Manos Jr.James Manos Jr. ("The Sopranos""The Sopranos"), who will exec produce with John GoldwynJohn Goldwyn and Sara Colleton.

Other pilots in the works at Showtime are "Filthy Gorgeous," about the world of high-end escorts, from producers Craig ZadanCraig Zadan and Neil MeronNeil Meron and writer Ron Nyswaner; "The Tudors," period piece about the younger years of Henry VIII, from writer Michael Hirst and producers Ben SilvermanBen Silverman, Eric FellnerEric Fellner and Tim Bevan; and "The Bastard," revolving around a lawyer looking to wrest his birthright away from his wealthy dysfunctional family, from scribe Robert Greenwalt.

Hall's credits include the John Woo feature "Paycheck""Paycheck" and the Broadway productions of "Cabaret" and "Chicago."

sfundah (shookout), Sunday, 9 October 2005 12:00 (nineteen years ago)

Poor, poor Showtime. Everything they put on seems like the retarded cousin of HBO's original series.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Sunday, 9 October 2005 16:11 (nineteen years ago)

sixteen years pass...

Whenever you get tired of the principals (something I could say of almost everyone at one point or another except maybe David), there's always Patricia Clarkson, Kathy Bates, Joanna Cassidy, and Catherine O'Hara having the time of their lives.

Some debate over the art-school stuff above. For me, the worst--it's a parody of a parody, a meta-parody of how movies fun of art school. Much of it is spouted by Olivier: worse even than the cocktail chatter in Woody Allen's Manhattan. (If it's accurate, so be it--doesn't make it any less horrifying, just makes me glad I never went to art school.)

clemenza, Sunday, 10 October 2021 23:58 (three years ago)

"movies make fun of"

clemenza, Sunday, 10 October 2021 23:58 (three years ago)

The first time I watched it through I was studying for a mixed arts-style undergraduate degree and the art school stuff - Claire and Russell's self-important disaffectedness, Jimmy's on-the-nose pseudo-celebrity, the cocaine photo exhibition...that all felt very otm. Hideous, but accurate.

tangent x (tangenttangent), Monday, 11 October 2021 11:25 (three years ago)

I guess I got a bit of that taking a film degree in the early '80s, but not nearly as over-the-top (and, except for one course, we were studying films, not making them).

clemenza, Monday, 11 October 2021 13:18 (three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.