― to let - flats (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 6 June 2005 03:16 (twenty years ago)
― Cool Hand Luuke (ex machina), Monday, 6 June 2005 03:19 (twenty years ago)
― The Father of Honky-Crunk (Matt Chesnut), Monday, 6 June 2005 03:20 (twenty years ago)
― to let - flats (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 6 June 2005 03:22 (twenty years ago)
― Rock Hardy (Rock Hardy), Monday, 6 June 2005 03:25 (twenty years ago)
― Amon (eman), Monday, 6 June 2005 03:43 (twenty years ago)
Then he'll turn around, shaking with spastic, silent laughter. We'll all shrug and resume our business.
― Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Monday, 6 June 2005 03:46 (twenty years ago)
referencing David Lynch.
abstracted floral graphics.
telling people how amazing late Talk Talk is, and how moved you are by them.
― jed_, Friday, 23 November 2007 02:15 (eighteen years ago)
"not so much"
please everybody
it's so awful & not even mildly funny at this point
― in which we apologize for sobering up (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 13:26 (sixteen years ago)
not so much with the not so much
― NUDE. MAYNE. (s1ocki), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 13:27 (sixteen years ago)
is it meant to be funnie?
― long time listener, first time balla (history mayne), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 13:28 (sixteen years ago)
I don't think lol funny but you always get the sense that it's supposed to be a somewhat clever way of saying "I don't like this one thing"
― in which we apologize for sobering up (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 13:30 (sixteen years ago)
ugg boots
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 13:40 (sixteen years ago)
oh man can we give up on "that one thing/that one guy/that one time"
s0 played
― long time listener, first time balla (history mayne), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 13:41 (sixteen years ago)
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, May 18, 2010 9:40 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Wait, are you saying "let's have a moratorium on Uggs" or is "Ugg boots" your way of expressing disgust at people who say "not so much".
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 13:45 (sixteen years ago)
somewhat clever way of saying
"clever" = "Jewish"?
― jaymc, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 13:46 (sixteen years ago)
i have no idea how the latter works xp
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 13:47 (sixteen years ago)
nicht so sehr
― _▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 13:51 (sixteen years ago)
Every time I hear that one phrase, I throw up a little in my ugg boots.
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 13:56 (sixteen years ago)
It's like someone saying "Ugh," but then taking it just a little further: "Ugg boots."
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:19 (sixteen years ago)
UGG BOOTS ARE MADE FROM CLUBBED SEALS
^^let's get ourselves LIBELLED
― coalition to me (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:28 (sixteen years ago)
and worn by clubbing chicks
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:30 (sixteen years ago)
'would smash'/'bro'
reasons
casually misogynist/sounds homosocial, also fratholish
― cleggaeton (suzy), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:34 (sixteen years ago)
I don't mind "bro"
I've always hated "would smash" but you gotta pick your battles & save yr ammo and the guys (and gals in fairness) who say are Totally Great Guys After All so y'know w/e
― in which we apologize for sobering up (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:35 (sixteen years ago)
brobrobrocial
― long time listener, first time balla (history mayne), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:36 (sixteen years ago)
tbh being casually misogynist makes my fuckin day, every day.
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:37 (sixteen years ago)
tbh
― Ward Fowler, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:38 (sixteen years ago)
starting posts with
"uh,"
― The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:38 (sixteen years ago)
"Smash" sounds hot/romantic/cute to me, not misogynist, although I could see how it could be interpretted that way.
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:39 (sixteen years ago)
you can just ctrl+f & replace with "would snog" tho right?
― retarded candle burning at both ends (dyao), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:40 (sixteen years ago)
See, snog sounds really vulgar to me.
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:41 (sixteen years ago)
dyao do you copy ilx threads into word before reading
― in which we apologize for sobering up (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:41 (sixteen years ago)
I use smash all the time and obv not in a misogynistic manner. I don't really get hung up on or bothered by language often though.
― Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:41 (sixteen years ago)
word is my browser :(
― retarded candle burning at both ends (dyao), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:41 (sixteen years ago)
am firmly in the anti-'would smash' camp but aerosmith is pretty much otm there
oh lol at that last thing, dyao's more a notepad man i'da thought
― coalition to me (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:42 (sixteen years ago)
xp- awesome concept.
rueful admission- am now concerned that inclusion of the word 'fuckin' in my previous bolshy post comes across as too sexually aggressive. y'all mfers getting to me.
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:42 (sixteen years ago)
hahahahaha
― Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:43 (sixteen years ago)
^this guy balls hard on ILX
― coalition to me (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:43 (sixteen years ago)
not a guy iirc
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:43 (sixteen years ago)
but she does
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:44 (sixteen years ago)
u misogynist for noticing
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:44 (sixteen years ago)
"Angus, Thongs, and Perfect Snogging" could be from H.P. Lovecraft, all the chills it inspires in me.
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:44 (sixteen years ago)
also makes searching youtube for drunk hen-night shenanigans a pointless exercise ime
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:45 (sixteen years ago)
dammit can't a dude forgo an xpost for once in his life
― coalition to me (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:45 (sixteen years ago)
snog sothoth
― am0n, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:47 (sixteen years ago)
lol am0n
― in which we apologize for sobering up (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:47 (sixteen years ago)
LOL - perfect!
― Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:49 (sixteen years ago)
Ugg boots really are the most inexplicably prevalent fashion trends of the last ten years. I'd sooner parse croc-sandals before these glorified granny slippers of which wannabe fashionista girls never seem to tire.
― village idiot (dog latin), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:49 (sixteen years ago)
Sure I've seen lots of ILX girls (and gay dudes) use the phrase 'smashable' to refer to blokes.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:50 (sixteen years ago)
xp it's a clever ploy - by incorporating the very disgust they evoke into the brand name, they have effectively shielded themselves from all criticism
― retarded candle burning at both ends (dyao), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:50 (sixteen years ago)
Ugg boots and crocs are equally awful. I really can't believe that people still wear either.
― Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:51 (sixteen years ago)
i don't have a problem w. ugg boots
kinda indifferent
― long time listener, first time balla (history mayne), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:52 (sixteen years ago)
good way of identifying people i don't want to talk to without actually having to do so, though.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:52 (sixteen years ago)
If I see a girl wearing Uggs I automatically assume that I would hate her. I know thats awful but it's true.
― Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:52 (sixteen years ago)
uggs >>>>>>>>>>>>> crocs
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:53 (sixteen years ago)
Waiting for some sort of ugg/croc hybrid sandal/boot tbh.
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:55 (sixteen years ago)
with wheels
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:56 (sixteen years ago)
OK yeah, in terms of appearance only Uggs are not quite as awful as Crocs but I rarely see Crocs anymore. Thank God.
― Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:57 (sixteen years ago)
true--the longevity of uggs is striking, it's been like 5 years or something!
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:58 (sixteen years ago)
I became permanently biased against Fleet Foxes after seeing an early press photo where one of them was wearing crocs. Indefensible.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:58 (sixteen years ago)
met a girl last week who seemed cool, then i noticed she was wearing ugg boots. within 10 minutes she was telling me that "benefits culture has got completely out of hand"
― The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:59 (sixteen years ago)
just another data point for you
What's benefits culture?
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:00 (sixteen years ago)
it was totally cute though when my mom asked me if I could score some ugg boots for her for cheap
― retarded candle burning at both ends (dyao), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:01 (sixteen years ago)
a band from Bethnal Green
― in which we apologize for sobering up (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:01 (sixteen years ago)
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Tuesday, May 18, 2010 4:00 PM (59 seconds ago) Bookmark
people living on benefits
― long time listener, first time balla (history mayne), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:01 (sixteen years ago)
hahaha oh shit that'd be quite a good band name
― coalition to me (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:02 (sixteen years ago)
DOUBLE MEANINGS 'R' US
i've heard people defend crocs on the basis that they aerate (why can i not spell this word?) the feet if walking around a lot, and while they do make your plates look pretty ridiculous, I know from experience that when it comes to foot odour, sometimes practicality can outweigh aesthetics.
― village idiot (dog latin), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:05 (sixteen years ago)
the straps can also get caught in escalators, possibly along with the rest of your foot.
― retarded candle burning at both ends (dyao), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:06 (sixteen years ago)
hopefully
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:08 (sixteen years ago)
Man I'm so totally down with benefits culture at the moment. Visited the National Museum of Welfare and Freeloading the other day, and since then I've decorated one wall of my house with vintage UB40 slips. The single-mum look is really in right now, which might explain the prevalence of Ugg boots come to think of it.
― village idiot (dog latin), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:09 (sixteen years ago)
joined up thinking ^
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:10 (sixteen years ago)
Still don't understand what's so hateable about Ugg boots -- seems like most people's hatred is based on the kind of woman who typically wears Uggs rather than the Uggs themselves, which just look like soft, comfortable-looking boots. (I mean, I totally get why some people hate Crocs -- they look silly.)
― jaymc, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:13 (sixteen years ago)
they are worn by the kind of people who wouldn't normally be seen dead in soft, comfortable, shapeless, unstylish, unflattering things. i just don't get it.
― I don't want to go into my newt details (ledge), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:16 (sixteen years ago)
well i think in part because of the softness and comfort ppl took to wearing them with every conceivably outfit--uggs w/jeans, uggs w/skirts, uggs in warm weather, uggs and leggings that show yr butt, etc. and that's super annoying because you're just wearing slippers outside and getting away with it.
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:21 (sixteen years ago)
they're not hideous like crocs, but they are ugly
Done and done.
http://cdn2.overstock.com/images/products/1/632/P11723850.jpg
― sinister chemical wisdom (Jenny), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:23 (sixteen years ago)
oh god no
― Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:24 (sixteen years ago)
ugg boots are cankles for the rest of us
― The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:24 (sixteen years ago)
the hybrid thing should at least be worn as a fancy genital adornment
that's the only semi-dignified use for it I can think of
― coalition to me (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:26 (sixteen years ago)
Only you would think of it as such Louis. Only you. ;p
― Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:26 (sixteen years ago)
by this point of sleepless internet wurgling my brain is papier mache - I need a lie-down tbh
― coalition to me (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:27 (sixteen years ago)
hey that could be comfortable - fur-lined, holes to breathe through.
― retarded candle burning at both ends (dyao), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:28 (sixteen years ago)
the guys (and gals in fairness) who say are Totally Great Guys After All so y'know w/e
― in which we apologize for sobering up (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 14:35 (50 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
In the same spirit, annoying turns of phrase I overlook cos they come from solid peeps: 'your face' for 'you' as in "I miss your face" (idk how commonplace this is); girls calling their best friends 'wife'
― she is mottled and she's looking good (DJ Mencap), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:29 (sixteen years ago)
I have defended both these terrible shoes before but I will do it again:
Aesthetically, I don't like Uggs, but on some cold ass winter mornings, I see women in their cozy, fleece-lined boots and I think to myself, "I really wish I was wearing a pair of cozy, fleece-lined boots right now." (I have warm, waterproof boots, which are nice, but they aren't as soft as I imagine Uggs to be.)
Crocs are hideously ugly but I have purchased two pairs of the mary jane style with the holes in them because sometimes my feet swell up in the summer and they are pretty nice to wear when that happens. I also have a pair of Crocs flip flops but I only wear those to the pool. Oh, okay, fine, I also have a pair of Crocs brand shoes that don't have holes in them but are supposed to just look like flats but I don't like them very much because when I walk in them, my feet make farty noises.
― sinister chemical wisdom (Jenny), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:29 (sixteen years ago)
The worst is people who continue to wear Uggs despite the instep having visibly buckled and knackered.
― village idiot (dog latin), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:31 (sixteen years ago)
^^^yeah this
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:31 (sixteen years ago)
Crocs are gardening shoes. The best gardening shoes ever devised.
― nori dusted (Sanpaku), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:33 (sixteen years ago)
i've never had a problem with crocs. and i hate everything! they seemed pretty functional on marthas vineyard. haven't seen them much since moving. though maria and the kids have them.
ugg boots seem like a fad that should have gone away by now. like rainbow suspenders.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:33 (sixteen years ago)
your face' for 'you' as in "I miss your face" (idk how commonplace this is); girls calling their best friends 'wife'
granted im a shut-in but srsly not heard these
i guess 'face' kinda functions as...
actually im not going to say it. louisbait.
― long time listener, first time balla (history mayne), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:33 (sixteen years ago)
Ugg boots look like they would get totally snagged on a bramble if you were ever being pursued by a wolf.
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:33 (sixteen years ago)
i think uggs make sense in certain locations: i.e. cold-ass places, as a here-to-there sort of shoe. but as a fashion shoe they are ridicuous. wearing them to anywhere formal/fancy/dressy it is like wearing l.l. beans duck boots to a fucking high school prom
― ampersand (remy bean), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:35 (sixteen years ago)
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), 18 May 2010 15:33 (1 minute ago) Bookmark
again, hopefully
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:36 (sixteen years ago)
would like moratorium on how fucking cloudy it's been every day for the last 3 weeks
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:36 (sixteen years ago)
massive heatwave predicted form tomorrow onwards for a fortnight, innit?
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:38 (sixteen years ago)
Well, call me oversensitive to language but I am a writer, therefore it's kind of my job to question usage if I identify a dodgy impulse behind the word choice. I don't like sexual contact slang that references smashing or hitting, or calls the object of desire 'that'. Reports of girls saying 'smash' does not make this OK.
Crocs are useful because we really needed another form of visual shorthand to identify idiots. Crocs signpost idiocy in a brilliant way if worn outside a nursing or gardening context..
My mom has black Uggs because she fucked up her ankle five years ago (it needed bolts and pins) and needed comfort in boot form. She gets a pass. As far as Uggs on women we don't like, surely the rest of their outfits can provide useful cues with the boots being the final confirmation of some personal shortcoming.
― cleggaeton (suzy), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:39 (sixteen years ago)
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, May 18, 2010 4:36 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark
it's been p nice up here in cambridge, in the mornings espesh
bit cloudy now tho
― long time listener, first time balla (history mayne), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:42 (sixteen years ago)
if I identify a dodgy impulse behind the word choice
It seems a little strident to use the word 'identify' as opposed to, say, 'attribute' in this context, don't you think?
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:42 (sixteen years ago)
I might have to question your use of the word 'strident'.
We have been plagued by beautiful mornings but the clouds come in just in time to ruin jacketless lunch plans, then fuck off again just as everyone goes back to their offices..
― cleggaeton (suzy), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:44 (sixteen years ago)
ha! yeah i was, admittedly, trying to find an alternative for strident but what you gonna do i'm at work.
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:45 (sixteen years ago)
No, that's totally fair, suzy. But when I think "smash", I think of how much it sounds like "smush" - like hard things yielding and becoming soft - plus having the (British?) connotations of success: "the play was a smash" "you look absolutely smashing".
many xps.
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:45 (sixteen years ago)
nah 'smash' is pure feral lust in this context, but i don't think it's enough to label it misogynist. i know plenty of ladies that are prone to smashing hot guys of a saturday night.
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:48 (sixteen years ago)
some of the kids say "lash" these days. maybe not "would lash", yet.
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:49 (sixteen years ago)
that's an irish thing from, what, the 90's?
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:51 (sixteen years ago)
most grime lyrics are just stolen from old Corrs b-sides
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:52 (sixteen years ago)
the word "impulse" is the one worth interrogating there imo darraghmac - I don't think you can argue that the word "smash" is generally a term of violence
― in which we apologize for sobering up (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:54 (sixteen years ago)
that is ISN'T. dammit.
now, see, the comment i'm stopping myself from making about the corrs' b-sides would have been misogynist.
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:55 (sixteen years ago)
i'd argue the certainty of using 'identify' is more telling than the possibility of an'impulse' behind someone else's use of a word on the internet to be perfectly honest with you.
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:57 (sixteen years ago)
now look you are making me into one of those funhaters again.
xxp are you an 'all the Corrs' or 'none of the Corrs' man d-mac?
― she is mottled and she's looking good (DJ Mencap), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:58 (sixteen years ago)
that really depends on whether 'all' includes jim.
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 15:59 (sixteen years ago)
in my defense, my crocs are black.
― Maria :D, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:00 (sixteen years ago)
and not attached to boots
― Maria :D, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:01 (sixteen years ago)
do uggs really offer a level of cozy plushness that can't be obtained via quality socks? ie the kind that make you feel you're walking on carpet even when on hardwood
― hope this helps (Granny Dainger), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:05 (sixteen years ago)
shdn't wear boots on carpet imo
― long time listener, first time balla (history mayne), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:07 (sixteen years ago)
kinda want to say that i want a moratorium on outdated gangsta wear, but i think this is just me getting old. still, i do feel like i've been looking at people's gangsta boxer shorts for decades now.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:09 (sixteen years ago)
The pace of fashion and style
― The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:11 (sixteen years ago)
okie, here is my challops MORATORIUM submission:
1) Vibram 5 fingers running barefoot style shoes
2) the specious advertising lines that gets repeated ad nauseum (and at length in christopher mcdougall's 'born to run' book) as if they were hard, consistent verifiable science w/r/t the shoes, e.g.: "people were made to run barefoot" and "it's a more natural way to run" and "it's how our ancestors ran" except that our ancestors did not take a 3 mile daily jog on concrete surfaces after a lifetime of conditioning to shoes. also they died at age 30 and hobbled around basically-crippled, and @#$^!@%#^&@!^^!@
― ampersand (remy bean), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:11 (sixteen years ago)
like until there are at least a few independent and repeatable studies regarding the long-term benefits of running barefoot that significantly counteract the many decades of support and evidence for the comfort/stability/safety offered by athletic shoes, stop wagging the 'natural' card at me.
― ampersand (remy bean), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:13 (sixteen years ago)
outdated gangster wear? like zoot suits and violin cases? that shit needs to come back in
/yeah sorry, couldn't resist.
― village idiot (dog latin), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:14 (sixteen years ago)
haha, remy, I was thinking along those lines today when I noticed in our work cafeteria they were selling these highly overpriced teabags that advertised themselves as "how tea ought to be" (or something). I mean, come on - for how long have people been drinking twiggy lapsang souchong with wild berry essence "£(&£$&, as opposed to, well you know, the hot beige-grey stuff with too much milk - the stuff most people ask for when they want tea? It might be a taste sensation, but don't sell me authenticity as if this hipster nonsense is some traditional brew that our great-grandparents used to drink before PG Tips came and enslaved us all with their "not-proper" tea.
― village idiot (dog latin), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:19 (sixteen years ago)
xxp how about this study?
http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=running-barefoot-is-better-research-2010-01-27
― I don't want to go into my newt details (ledge), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, i've read that study. daniel lieberman and his one study doesn't really come close to convincing me.
― ampersand (remy bean), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:25 (sixteen years ago)
fairy nuff, but i like the quote at the end:
"There is no hard proof that running in shoes… causes injuries," William Jungers, a professor of anatomical sciences at Stony Brook University in Long Island, NY, wrote in a commentary that accompanies the new study. But, he asserted, "In my view there is no compelling evidence that it prevents them either."
― I don't want to go into my newt details (ledge), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:29 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/magazine/articles/2009/04/19/what_ruins_running/
So how do the Tarahumara, running in shoes that barely qualify as shoes, do it? Three years ago, I trekked into the Copper Canyons of Mexico in search of the secret. And once I learned how to run barefoot-style -- landing on the balls of the feet, while keeping my feet directly under my hips -- like the Tarahumara, my ailments suddenly disappeared. Plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendinitis, sore knees -- all gone. Today, I wear something similar to a rubber glove for the foot (it has the thinnest of soles to guard against abrasions), and I haven't looked back.
― hope this helps (Granny Dainger), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:33 (sixteen years ago)
Main problem is that no-one is going to fund research into running barefoot because it's not in anyone's economic interest.
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:33 (sixteen years ago)
Ugg boots & Crocs both part of the pajamafication of normal life. Hate this phenomena, hate them both for that reason.
― wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:34 (sixteen years ago)
hence the vibram 5 fingers, sure nike et al would come out with their own versions if it took off. oh they already have, kinda. (xp)
― I don't want to go into my newt details (ledge), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:35 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, i'm anti-sweatpants. i really am an old fogey.
x-post
― scott seward, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:35 (sixteen years ago)
I dress like a disgusting bum at home, though. This is what pajamas and work/painting clothes are for, for doing messy chores on the weekend. And tshirts that you've (okay, I've) had since 9th grade, and (yes!) sweatpants! Only objecting to them in public.
― wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:37 (sixteen years ago)
Multiple xps: That Boston Globe article is by the same guy whose book Remy criticizes. Proven or not, I like his arguments cos the simplicity of barefoot running appeals to me.
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:39 (sixteen years ago)
Laurel OTM
― Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:53 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, totally. its when someone stumbles into a coffee shop at 8 in the morning in grimey pajama top and sweat pants and acts like they aren't in public but in their kitchen that gets me. for some reason.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:57 (sixteen years ago)
I don't see anything wrong with pajamas in public. Clothing should be about being comfortable.
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:01 (sixteen years ago)
You have to switch it up. Like wearing a suit with flipflops. Or leather dress shoes, tight wool pants and a ribbed tanktop.
― The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:01 (sixteen years ago)
Or my own personal favorite, a baja paired with a thong.
― The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:02 (sixteen years ago)
choice of attire when in public is not 100% about being comfortable. that's the reason why i'm not wearing a sheer loincloth right now.
― hope this helps (Granny Dainger), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:04 (sixteen years ago)
really if you can't find clothes that aren't suitably comfortable without resorting to pajamas, you don't deserve to ever leave the house
Comfort, modesty, and protection against the elements.
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:05 (sixteen years ago)
One of my students had worn pajamas & a sweatshirt to class for the seventh or eighth consecutive time, so I ribbed her about it a little: "Having another slumber party today?" And she said, "I live on campus," like the whole thing was her home or something.
― frozen cookie (Abbott), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:05 (sixteen years ago)
But for some, pajamas are not something to "resort" to as much as something to look forward to.
Yes, I look forward to them while wearing actual clothes.
― wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:06 (sixteen years ago)
Nah, clothing is about presenting an image of yourself to the world, and if the image you want to present is "I don't give a fuck about anybody but me and my comfort," then I'm going to shun you socially, shun you professionally and not get too torqued when I read about you getting busted for selling your baby for two bottles of beer.
― Grisly Addams (WmC), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:06 (sixteen years ago)
That's pretty harsh, isn't it?
― Grisly Addams (WmC), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:07 (sixteen years ago)
harsh but fair
― hope this helps (Granny Dainger), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:08 (sixteen years ago)
xp Naw.
― wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:08 (sixteen years ago)
One of my best-loved friends wear pajamas/sweats in public bcz she has x-treme pelvic floor pain issues, I guess, and seams of jeans or trousers make her basically to pained to walk around. So, you never know.
― frozen cookie (Abbott), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:08 (sixteen years ago)
It means she also has a bidet, which is like having a rollercoaster, in my mind.
― frozen cookie (Abbott), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:09 (sixteen years ago)
But the point wasn't about professional associations. Scott was talking about people in coffee shops for crying out loud. I'm wearing a suit right now because I'm at work, but I'm not gonna add to my dry-cleaning bill because I want to impress someone at Starbucks.
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:09 (sixteen years ago)
I realize that 80 years ago people could have this discussion about not wearing a hat and tie (what's the female equivalent? full length dress?) in public, but as a society we've got to draw the line somewhere and I say it's drawn at pajamas.
― hope this helps (Granny Dainger), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:10 (sixteen years ago)
Harsh would be me calling a moratorium on those faux Wellie rain boots that every woman in New York owns three pair of. Apparently. Bunch of oversized hydrophobic toddlers, is what they look like clomping around.
(I say it's harsh b/c I realize that good rain boots have a real purpose! I don't think walking from Grand Central to 46th St is that purpose, though.)
― wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:10 (sixteen years ago)
She should wear a dress, Abbott! I wish I could wear dresses, they have to be the most comfortable clothes ever.
I'm imagining ljagljana's wardrobe being divided into two sections - everything on the right is a suit or a dress shirt, and everything on the left is a different style of pajamas.
― The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:11 (sixteen years ago)
And on the desk is a stack of unpaid drycleaning bills that he grumbles over.
― The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:12 (sixteen years ago)
If you know what I mean
Fair point KKGZ but you do see people out who look like they've literally just rolled out of bed. I take the dog out for a walk before showering in the mornings and sometimes get coffee while doing so but I sure as hell brush my hair and throw on a pair of jeans before leaving the house.
― Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:13 (sixteen years ago)
No, it's not a fair point! I refuse to concede the point that it's a fair point! There's a hell of a lot of spectrum between suits and pajamas, and pls find something in the middle somewhere for wearage outside of your domicile/when not directly occupied by mucky chores.
― wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:15 (sixteen years ago)
I meant that he didn't have to wear formal/business attire just to grab some coffee not that pajamas as outerwear should be acceptable.
― Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:17 (sixteen years ago)
Suit pants and pajama shirt. I swear I have seen people do this.
― The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:17 (sixteen years ago)
I don't actually wear pajamas outside of the house. I'm just sticking up for those who do.
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:17 (sixteen years ago)
Now, posts with 30% MORE feigned outrage, absolutely free! Mine, at least.
I'm from kind of a formal family -- my dad puts on a clean flannel, tucks in his shirt, and wears a belt to work on the car. If his shirt comes untucked while he's doing stuff, he tucks it back in. Revolutionary!
― wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:18 (sixteen years ago)
see also: doctors wearing their scrubs everywhere. Hey doc, I know you're saving lives, etc. but please get changed in the freaking hospital locker room.
― p.j.b. (pj), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:18 (sixteen years ago)
Just want to make it clear that I don't want pajamas-as-outerwear to be illegal or any other first-step-to-Sharia, I just don't think there's any justification or rationalization for doing it that doesn't say "I'm lazy and can't see past the end of my own id."
― Grisly Addams (WmC), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:22 (sixteen years ago)
Except maybe for medical reasons like Abbott's friend.
"It means she also has a bidet, which is like having a rollercoaster, in my mind."
totally read this as a bidet being like a rollercoaster in your mind. didn't see the comma.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:24 (sixteen years ago)
Love Is A Bidet
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:26 (sixteen years ago)
I would call it 'toddlerfication' but THANK YOU there is something so mentally slobby about people who do this; also seriously unclassy like yr. basic woman in velour tracksuit.
― cleggaeton (suzy), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:34 (sixteen years ago)
anti pj people are like repressive governments
― in which we apologize for sobering up (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:39 (sixteen years ago)
― nori dusted (Sanpaku), Tuesday, May 18, 2010 10:33 AM (2 hours ago)
I left my gardening sneakers outside last night in an unexpected rain, and they're nearly trash anyway, so I've been thinking about getting Crocs to replace them. But I wouldn't wear them past the perimeter of my property.
― Grisly Addams (WmC), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:44 (sixteen years ago)
this thread is tempting me to attempt making an outfit made entirely out of Crocs
― Have a slice of wine! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:45 (sixteen years ago)
i guess an outfit can just be some shoes
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:47 (sixteen years ago)
I'm talking Crocspants
― Have a slice of wine! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:47 (sixteen years ago)
crocpants with ventilated crotch gusset
― Grisly Addams (WmC), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:49 (sixteen years ago)
^^^ don't forget the matching Crocstank top
― Have a slice of wine! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:50 (sixteen years ago)
There's a person in the book Market Street by Arnold Lobel who is made entirely out of shoes, but I can't find the interior illustrations online. So this boring description will have to suffice (unfortunately).
― wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:50 (sixteen years ago)
http://materialconcern.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/amexdress.jpg
like this dress, only pants and shirt rather than a dress and Crocs rather than gold Amex cards
(btw I was so busy laughing at the Amex dress that I don't think I ever realized that that dude was wearing something secretly as terrible, if not actually worse)
― Have a slice of wine! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:53 (sixteen years ago)
who are those people?
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:57 (sixteen years ago)
why are they holding fake oscars?
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:58 (sixteen years ago)
loooooooooooooooooool
Those are the costume designers for "Priscilla, Queen of the Desert" holding the Oscars they won for that movie wearing the outfits they wore to the Academy Awards ceremony.
― Have a slice of wine! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:59 (sixteen years ago)
I guess I find it hard to get very worked up about what other people wear. Sure, I might judge or stereotype people based on their attire, but it doesn't make me angry or anything, especially not in a broad "what is wrong with people??" way.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 17:59 (sixteen years ago)
(Then again, I don't really put a whole lot of thought into what I wear, either, I just try to look decent most of the time.)
― jaymc, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:00 (sixteen years ago)
lol I just realized looking at those two that now we know what inspired Gwen Stefani and Gavin Rossdale
― Have a slice of wine! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:01 (sixteen years ago)
dan i'm just going to pretend your post is completely made up
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:01 (sixteen years ago)
lol Omar Little's most recent FB status update: Inspired by a couple I saw at the post office: going out in public in your pajamas (post-college) is weird.
― Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:08 (sixteen years ago)
Former nurse friend gets mad abt this, at her hospital there was no wearing scrubs outside of the ward for fear of them picking up bacteria and also that if folks are left to wash them themselves at home they'll get lax about doing it properly
(dunno if this is a general rule or has any sense to it, but it sounds like it might)
― xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:11 (sixteen years ago)
wearing scrubs around is essentially arrogant imo
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:12 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah wearing scrubs outside of hosp is for staff who might as well wear their street-clothes to work.
― wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:13 (sixteen years ago)
I get irrationally(*) upset when I get on the bus and see ppl wearing their scrubs heading into work, because I'm like "you are going to WORK and you are on the BUS, ew" and then I just pray I never get sick ever.
* perhaps not so irrational when you think about it
― Have a slice of wine! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:14 (sixteen years ago)
i live around like 5 nursing homes and see nursing assistants in their scrubs all the time. usually they're smoking and talking on the phone. i can't really be bothered to care about their attire, though.
― an outlet to express the dark invocations of (La Lechera), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:14 (sixteen years ago)
My wife works in a medical lab and is very strict about where she wears her work scrubs. They get washed immediately, doesn't wear her shoes in the house, etc. Not everybody is as careful as she is though. It's pretty scary.
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:21 (sixteen years ago)
I had someone come into my store wearing hotel slippers once.
― tokyo rosemary, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:23 (sixteen years ago)
did you guys read that link I posted about how in Singapore it's normal to wear pajamas outside
― in which we apologize for sobering up (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:41 (sixteen years ago)
Mammy minded mama Til one day in SingaporeA sailorman from TurkestanCame knockin' at the door
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:45 (sixteen years ago)
I thought the whole ida was scrubs was that you put on a clean, hygenic set when you entered the hospital and discarded them for laundering as necessary and then before leaving so as to minimise the contamination in and out of the hospital, but I guess this falls down when employees have to buy their own.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:46 (sixteen years ago)
I wish people on the internet would stop referring to things as being "dope".
― Darin, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:50 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, that would be gnarly
― Have a slice of wine! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 18:50 (sixteen years ago)
flipping the bird at the camera. You are not edgy or aggro doing that. Really.
― p.j.b. (pj), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 19:24 (sixteen years ago)
unless it's an actual bird
― Have a slice of wine! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 19:25 (sixteen years ago)
I got five years suspended for flipping birds in front of a camera but my lawyer argued that the camera was unconstitutional and now I'm free
free as a bird, you might say
― in which we apologize for sobering up (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 19:37 (sixteen years ago)
- in sports, calling any game that's not technically a potential elimination game a "must win game".
― hope this helps (Granny Dainger), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 22:45 (sixteen years ago)
i won't ever stop saying things are dope.
― you better check that sausage before you put it in the rofl (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 22:48 (sixteen years ago)
dope
― ampersand (remy bean), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 22:50 (sixteen years ago)
Fast food restaurant employees stupidly not understanding that wearing gloves during the preparation of food does not mean you can also touch things other than food while you're wearing them (money, your phone, whatever else).
― fields of salmon, Tuesday, 18 May 2010 22:52 (sixteen years ago)
that is nothing compared with customers sneezing/blowing their noses into their hands (for godssakes, when will this country learn to sneeze into their collective elbows..?) and then handing money to the cashier who has to touch snotty cash.
― ampersand (remy bean), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 22:55 (sixteen years ago)
do not even get me started on people not understanding the mechanisms of communicable everyday viruses - that belongs in the "disgusting savages" thread though imo
― in which we apologize for sobering up (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 23:11 (sixteen years ago)
flipping the bird at the camera. You are not edgy or aggro doing that. Really.― p.j.b. (pj), Tuesday, May 18, 2010 3:24 PM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― p.j.b. (pj), Tuesday, May 18, 2010 3:24 PM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
hey WOW yes. or actually I don't know if it requires a moratorium or not; it's just weird. it's like the finger has become such a normal/widespread "attitude" (or even "sexy!") pose that it's basically lost any sense of signifying anything or being directed at anyone. which I guess isn't totally different from what happened to victory/peace signs, photo-wise, but it's totally fascinating to me for something that says "fuck you" to evolve into a gesture that only says "I've got sexy attitude," like the equivalent of a little sneer/pout or whatever.
which seems symptomatic of some way more general thing along those lines
― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Tuesday, 18 May 2010 23:56 (sixteen years ago)
LOLing at the "ew ugg boots have been around for like 5 years now!" thing.
You guys are aware that these are an Australian thing and have existed here since the 1970s and were EXCLUSIVELY the domain of grotty, white trash bogans in acid wash jeans and accadacca tshirts, right?
― Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 00:01 (sixteen years ago)
its like we played a big joke on slebs. It's freakin awesome.
― Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 00:02 (sixteen years ago)
Your putting it that way is helping me make my peace with them. At least until I next see a pair in the wild.
― Attention please, a child has been lost in the tunnel of goats. (James Morrison), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 00:12 (sixteen years ago)
James -vs- The Bogans! i would watch that movie. it might even be as good as my fave aussie rachel ward movie Fortress.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 19 May 2010 00:29 (sixteen years ago)
Bogan is a pretty mintox word.
― Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 00:30 (sixteen years ago)
untooooold
― poutrock (electricsound), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 00:31 (sixteen years ago)
I first saw Uggs in like 1984 when the fried hippie-ish third grade teacher from Germany at my school had them - she was bragging them up as an exotic Australian thing in that innocent post-Men at Work, pre-Crocodile Dundee era of American knowledge about Australia.
― NARTH Gaydar (joygoat), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 00:32 (sixteen years ago)
― xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, May 19, 2010 2:11 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark
lol my dad wears his old scrubs around the house and when doing general household work (full disclosure my dad is not a licensed medical professional, just someone who works at a hospital). he thinks it's absolutely awesome he can get such roomy and comfortable clothes for cheap from work and always asks me if I want him to sneak me any scrubs on the downlow
― retarded candle burning at both ends (dyao), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 01:17 (sixteen years ago)
<3 can we please have no moratorium on dyao's dad and his tricks.
― estela, Wednesday, 19 May 2010 01:21 (sixteen years ago)
yuh my buddy who's all but finished med gets around in scrubs because 'he doesn't have any other pants'
― wilter, Wednesday, 19 May 2010 01:23 (sixteen years ago)
also busted my ugghs out for first time this year on the weekend : )
― wilter, Wednesday, 19 May 2010 01:24 (sixteen years ago)
<3
other ilxors might not know this but we are allowed to wear what we like in queensland, we are a special case.
― estela, Wednesday, 19 May 2010 01:29 (sixteen years ago)
i just want you all to be happy
― coining (Lamp), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 01:36 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/world/2010/05/23/gps.last.look.cnn?hpt=T2
― hope this helps (Granny Dainger), Monday, 24 May 2010 05:57 (sixteen years ago)
For the record, there are some of us in the medical biz who hate hate hate scrubs, and would never so much as wear them on the sidewalk outside the hospital.
That shit don't stretch. At all. And they itch like crazy.
― ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Monday, 24 May 2010 06:40 (sixteen years ago)
More fashion things that don't exactly look bad, but just seem a bit over-done already:
Roman sandals1940's fighter-pilot style haircuts
― village idiot (dog latin), Monday, 24 May 2010 10:01 (sixteen years ago)
Burden's on you to explain what that even is to me, dog latin.
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Monday, 24 May 2010 11:28 (sixteen years ago)
yeah im not really sure if either of those things are 'things'
― long time listener, first time balla (history mayne), Monday, 24 May 2010 11:50 (sixteen years ago)
since starting work in london i've noticed that the Roman-style sandal is the choice footwear for many women, and the Hoxton "fin" has been usurped by a kind of short-back-'n'sides plus side-parted quiff look on guys. It's not that either are that bad, but the sheer amount of people rocking these looks displays a sincere lack of imagination among trendy Londoners (shockah!)
― village idiot (dog latin), Monday, 24 May 2010 12:00 (sixteen years ago)
Quiff has told me all I need to know, right there. Thanks!
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Monday, 24 May 2010 12:07 (sixteen years ago)
gladiator sandals are definitely a thing - h mayne you clearly just aren't spending enough time looking at women's feet.
i have not noticed this hair business tho.
― naglpuss (c sharp major), Monday, 24 May 2010 12:20 (sixteen years ago)
short-back-'n'sides plus side-parted quiff
I am sort of rocking this at the minute although 'quiff' would be stretching a point - if it is a thing (I am of the provinces innit) then so be it, I like it
― she is mottled and she's looking good (DJ Mencap), Monday, 24 May 2010 12:22 (sixteen years ago)
I noticed the pomaded hair business...about two years ago. Fins are the preserve of the provincial nightclub thug now.
― when the fertilizer hits the ventilator (suzy), Monday, 24 May 2010 12:26 (sixteen years ago)
hmm, not sure if im rocking this or not. more yes than no
got no probs w sandals on girls
― long time listener, first time balla (history mayne), Monday, 24 May 2010 12:44 (sixteen years ago)
men in flip-flops otoh
― I don't want to go into my newt details (ledge), Monday, 24 May 2010 13:01 (sixteen years ago)
+ short-sleeved polo shirt + cargo shorts
they all appear out of nowhere on the first vaguely sunny day of the year
― I don't want to go into my newt details (ledge), Monday, 24 May 2010 13:03 (sixteen years ago)
that's because it's hot, tbf
― village idiot (dog latin), Monday, 24 May 2010 13:06 (sixteen years ago)
Not this tired argument again.
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Monday, 24 May 2010 13:08 (sixteen years ago)
Like, I just bought my flip-flops at Wal-Mart last week and my feet have never been happier. Cargo shorts are pretty lame though. What can you put in all those pockets?
― ljagljana (kkvgz), Monday, 24 May 2010 13:11 (sixteen years ago)
a spare pair of cargo shorts
― Face Book (dyao), Monday, 24 May 2010 13:11 (sixteen years ago)
I adore that haircut but maybe the over-use phenomenon you speak of hasn't hit here yet...? Hmmph. Will get in line for being over gladiator sandals, does that start over here by the drinking fountain?
― salad dressing of doom (Laurel), Monday, 24 May 2010 13:35 (sixteen years ago)
...people thinking contemporary network TV series are great, compelling popular art
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Monday, 24 May 2010 13:37 (sixteen years ago)
Morbsbot is loose on the main deck, I repeat, Morbsbot is loose on the main deck
― The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Monday, 24 May 2010 13:38 (sixteen years ago)
flip flops are comfortable! might as well have a moratorium on pajamas.
― Darin, Monday, 24 May 2010 14:52 (sixteen years ago)
We did pajamas upthread last week.
― frozen cookie (Abbott), Monday, 24 May 2010 14:53 (sixteen years ago)
What else? Cookies? Clean sheets? New tires?
― Darin, Monday, 24 May 2010 14:54 (sixteen years ago)
find flip-flops incredibly uncomfortable, myself.
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Monday, 24 May 2010 14:54 (sixteen years ago)
They're tough on webbed feet, it's true.
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Monday, 24 May 2010 14:56 (sixteen years ago)
idgi
― May be half naked, but knows a good headline when he sees it (darraghmac), Monday, 24 May 2010 14:59 (sixteen years ago)
Flip flops are hated by podiatrists.
― frozen cookie (Abbott), Monday, 24 May 2010 15:27 (sixteen years ago)
"flip flops cause trouble" lol
― Mark G, Monday, 24 May 2010 16:06 (sixteen years ago)