Why is it okay to judge how celebrities look?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
(This is in response to the Renee Zellweger thread and other similar ones.) Why do people feel it's okay to say things about celebrities' appearance you would never about someone you know, or even about a stranger you've met on the street? I kinda understand commenting on boob jobs or anorexia, but what about criticizing someone's face or other things he/she can't help about? I know celebrities put theirselves on the line of fire by stepping into the spotlight, but unless they're models or beauty pageants, I still don't think this is cool.

Btw, I think Renee Zellweger's face is pretty.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 12:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Why do people feel it's okay to say things about celebrities' appearance you would never about someone you know, or even about a stranger you've met on the street?

you never have thoughts on how other people look *at all*?

N_RQ, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 12:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Because they are celebrities. This is part of how fame works.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 12:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Because celebrity rhymes with titty.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 12:24 (twenty-one years ago)

(Would you have posted this thread if people were talking badly about someone you thought was ugly? Also, you do see the inherent irony in positing this question, then going on to judge a celebrity's looks, right?)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 12:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Because they are celebrities. This is part of how fame works.

But that was my question exactly: why does it work that way?


you never have thoughts on how other people look *at all*?

Sure, but if I meet a an obese person on the street, my I won't go and tell all my friends, "I met a fat man on the street today, boy was he fat! Har har har!".


(Would you have posted this thread if people were talking badly about someone you thought was ugly? Also, you do see the inherent irony in positing this question, then going on to judge a celebrity's looks, right?)

I was mainly talking about criticizing someone's looks. Few people find calling someone pretty offensive, unless you're at the same time implying someone else isn't.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Sure, but if I meet a an obese person on the street, my I won't go and tell all my friends, "I met a fat man on the street today, boy was he fat! Har har har!".

You wouldn't? How odd.

Vicious Cop Kills Gentle Fool (Dada), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 12:38 (twenty-one years ago)

people discuss how other people look, don't they? maybe they don't say 'hahaha fatty fatman', but they might post to 'dear ___ i love you' threads.

N_RQ, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 12:39 (twenty-one years ago)

I was mainly talking about criticizing someone's looks.

So really the question is "is it okay to say negative (even if justifed) things about a stranger who doesn't have the chance to answer back". Tuomas, your lack of prejudice and your liberal attitude does you credit, but I think you need to achieve a bit more of a balance between mimsy idealism and real-world pragmatism.

Also, on the subject a little more, if all we saw of people was them in a state of naked naturalness*, then judging them on appearance would be indefensible. But we don't - most of *how* someone looks is a result of their own visual choices, and this is certainly a fair subject for discussion.


*okay, this is probably how it is in Finland

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 12:45 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't think it's indefensible to judge* how people look when naked. even if it weren't a matter of choice, which it is, i can't imagine how we would somehow switch off our own desire and get to this sublime state of nonjudgementalness.

*part of the problem is this word, though.

N_RQ, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 13:03 (twenty-one years ago)

because part of her market attractiveness is *in* her physical attractiveness/appearance. thus making it fair game to discuss it like big sweaty old men in a board meeting.

"do you think she looks hot?"
"no...she looks like a pinch faced 5 year old girl who got into the strawberry jam"

AaronK (AaronK), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 13:18 (twenty-one years ago)

This is very, very mean and I've said it before but she looks like she's saying 'you want a WHAT?!?' to a man asking for oral sex.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 13:25 (twenty-one years ago)

a look i know too well.

N_RQ, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 13:26 (twenty-one years ago)

OMG suzy

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 13:28 (twenty-one years ago)

it's ok to judge how celebrities look because they reinforce dangerous stereotypes and images of gender representation. like, y'know, they reinforce the idea that women can't have hair on their nipples, for example.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 13:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Dan, my MOM has even called her Little Miss Blow-Job Face.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 13:32 (twenty-one years ago)

"you want me to shave my WHAT!?"

AaronK (AaronK), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 13:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Because they have voluntarily enetered a profession that essentially creates and comodifies their appearance. It's like judging a car based on it's gas mileage or performance.

M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 13:47 (twenty-one years ago)

It should be okay to say whatever the hell you want about how people look. Especially celebrities because of what MWhite said. You wouldn't cast Renee Zellweger as a Bond Girl. There you fuckin' go. That is the truth. Actors and actresses CAREERS are defined by HOW THEY LOOK. Judging them based on looks is HUNKY DORY.

As for my first sentence, I've always felt it should be okay to just say whatever the fuck, because quite frankly sticks and stones may break etc. I tend not to JUDGE anybody by how they look or their accent or the way they dress, I judge them on things like competence and manners and honesty. That doesn't stop me from making frank assessments of certain coworkers' flair for borderline-tacky style-of-the-minute metrosexual Banana Republic work outfits. Or spare tires. Or bad haircuts. I expect no less from anyone else.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:08 (twenty-one years ago)

It could be worse, Tombot, they could be wearing head to toe Tommy Bahama.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Ugh, don't even joke about that.

Leon hearts Crazy Frog (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)

i like Tuomas and the way he thinks

i'm tired of people judging paris hilton!

Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:14 (twenty-one years ago)

It could be worse, Tombot, they could be wearing head to toe Tommy Bahama.

Or worse still, only head to waist Tommy Bahama.

M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, I bet she never judges people on their appearance! (xpost)

Vicious Cop Kills Gentle Fool (Dada), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Zelwegger could play Ms. Moneypenny.
Maybe she'd finally get Bond in the sack...

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

It's kind of tiresome seeing a seemingly endless parade of people you don't find remotely attractive or interesting in any way whatsoever held up as if they were some kind of apex of human rowrness, so I don't mind people dissing celebs on their appearance no. (unless I actually do think they're hott, anyway)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)


Don't look at me

Ooh, oh, oh, ooh,

Everyday is so wonderful, then suddenly, it's hard to breathe
Now and then I get insecure, from all the pain
I'm so ashamed

I am beautiful no matter what they say
Words can't bring me down
I am beautiful in every single way
Yes words can't bring me down
So don't you bring me down today

To all your friends you're delirious
So consumed in all your doom
Trying hard to fill the emptiness, the pieces gone,
Left the puzzle undone, is that the way it is?

You are beautiful no matter what they say
Words can't bring you down, No, no
Cause you are beautiful in every single way
Yes words can't bring you down. Oh, no
So don't you bring me down today

No matter what we do,
No matter what we say,
We're the song inside the tune, full of beautiful mistakes
And everywhere we go, ( And everywhere we go)
the sun will always shine
( The sun will Always, Always, Shine)
And tomorrow we might awake on the other side

'Cause we are beautiful no matter what they say
Yes words won't bring us down, no
We are beautiful in every single way
Yes words can't bring us down, oh , no
So don't you bring me down today

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)

As for my first sentence, I've always felt it should be okay to just say whatever the fuck, because quite frankly sticks and stones may break etc.

Do you really think that is true? If random people began to stop you on the street and say, "Boy, you look ugly!", you wouldn't get hurt? Words won't break your bones, true, but they can break your ego, your self-confidence, your ability to love yourself. Ask anyone who was bullied in school because of their looks.


I tend not to JUDGE anybody by how they look or their accent or the way they dress, I judge them on things like competence and manners and honesty. That doesn't stop me from making frank assessments of certain coworkers' flair for borderline-tacky style-of-the-minute metrosexual Banana Republic work outfits. Or spare tires. Or bad haircuts. I expect no less from anyone else.

I think everyone is entitled to their style too; perhaps it's a less vulnerable spot than that part of your appearance you can't change, but still... If I'd bought a shirt I'd really like, and came to work wearing it, and first the thing I'd hear is some co-worker saying, "What a tacky shirt!", that'd certainly bring me down.

The bottom line is: I don't think it's ever okay to mock on the appearance of strangers. Think about how'd you feel, if you'd learn people you don't even know were talking about how silly your face looks. Perhaps Renee Zellweger just wanted to be an actor, without realizing what that entails. In principle at least actors don't sell their innate appearance, but their ability to act. And what about celebrities who's looks aren't part of their job at all. Are they free from mockery then?

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:39 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm tired of rumors starting
I'm sick of being followed
I'm tired of people lying
Saying what they want about me
Why can't they back up off me
Why can't they let me live
I'm gonna do it my way
Take this for just what it is

by Lindsay Lohan, teen titty star

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Lindsay Lohan should pass out business cards that say "Teen Titty Star" on them.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Perhaps Renee Zellweger just wanted to be an actor, without realizing what that entails. In principle at least actors don't sell their innate appearance, but their ability to act.

yes, that's certainly a realistic assessment of the history of the entertainment business.

N_RQ, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:42 (twenty-one years ago)

And what about celebrities who's looks aren't part of their job at all. Are they free from mockery then?

"Y'know, She's got a real face for radio."

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, lets put it "celebrities whose looks shouldn't be a part of their job"... Remember how many jokes Conan O'Brien made about John Kerry's face wrinkles? Was that funny?

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)

As funny as when O'Brien does his "I'm a leprechaun" shtick.

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Ha ha, it was just there (xpost)

Vicious Cop Kills Gentle Fool (Dada), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Ask anyone who was bullied in school because of their looks.

Bifocles, big head, short and skinny, late to puberty. Sounds about right. Maybe that's my problem, skin's too thick.

TOMBOT, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Take it from me, getting teased in school is the best way to develop superior put-down skills.

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, I completely missed that comment before. People have told me that I'm handsome (and I am very, very certain they are correct) and I still was called nigger, darkie, jungle bunny(!!!), spade and spook at various points suring my pre-college life, so this whole "you don't understand because you're attractive" argument is a non-starter.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)

If I'd bought a shirt I'd really like, and came to work wearing it, and first the thing I'd hear is some co-worker saying, "What a tacky shirt!", that'd certainly bring me down.

http://www.jerksquad.com/archives_v1/images/jerks/neil_scared.jpg

VYVBOT, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 14:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Also a lot of it is that Celebrity X might be presented as someone who has been judged by consensus to be 'beautiful' and you happened to NOT GET THE MEMO.

Best thing I ever got told was by my uncle, who pointed out that the cute little blond girls in my junior high who made my life stressful with their aesthetic judgements would be all washed up in the looks department by the time we left high school - that is, if they ever graduated!

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 16:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, I completely missed that comment before. People have told me that I'm handsome (and I am very, very certain they are correct) and I still was called nigger, darkie, jungle bunny(!!!), spade and spook at various points suring my pre-college life, so this whole "you don't understand because you're attractive" argument is a non-starter.

Don't you feel then that people shouldn't be called upon things they have no choice over?


Take it from me, getting teased in school is the best way to develop superior put-down skills.

Well, it didn't do that for me, just left me with wounds it took ages to recover from. If that's the price of getting superior put-down skills, I'd rather not learn them. Today, I'm glad that I have a soft skin rather than the inner numbness I had to develop back then.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 16:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Ask anyone who was bullied in school because of their looks.

Tuomas, the problem with your statement here, as Dan has implied, is that your "anyone" is actually "everyone who has ever attended grade school."

The other problem with this thread is actually with the use of the word "judge." Saying you don't think Renee Zellwegger is attractive or you don't like the outfit someone is wearing is kind of miles away from judging them as a person at all. You can think someone is ugly and think they are talented, smart, nice, etc etc etc just as well as you can think someone is hot but find them completely untalented or unbearable in all other respects.

I mean, why is it ok to comment on boob jobs or anorexia?

Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 16:48 (twenty-one years ago)

also hstencil wins the "oh snap" award for the thread.

Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 16:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Boob jobs: because they're something you choose yourself, and in my opinion not a healthy phenomenon, especially on people idolized by others, and therefore worthy of concern.

Anorexia: because it is a disease, and therefore worthy of concern, especially if someone idolized by other suffers from it yet doesn't admit it.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)

i mean tuomas you can't seriously advocate a loosening of social standards/conditions that lead to massive amounts of the population feeling bad about their bodies while at the same saying that the people inherently involved with the mass communication of those societal standards/conditions should be free of criticism! that's amazing in its incoherence, to me.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 16:53 (twenty-one years ago)

"this infernal late-capitalism sure is screwing the workers, but y'know, i think the bosses are all right."

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 16:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Well rereading the Renee Zellwegger thread...a good half of the posts (at least) are expressing concern that she's A) gotten plastic surgery B) unhealthily thin.

So, by your definition, that thread is actually ok.

In my opinion it's perfectly OK to discuss celebrity plastic surgery (I agree not a healthy phenomenon, and I don't like the fact that so many get stuff done and then lie and say they haven't because I think that creates an unhealthy image for others. I am more in tune with the Pamela Anderson/Carmen Electra standard of just admitting you paid for your tits and being honest because I think that's a lot less unhealthy for "society as a whole") and it's perfectly OK to discuss anorexia (except it's a questionable thing to discuss in and of itself: yeah, it's pretty obvious that, say, Renee Zellwegger or Lindsay Lohan have both lost a significant amount of weight since becoming famous, but the "anorexia concerns" seem to apply to quite a lot of famous women who don't fit the "visibly has lost weight" category as well--see the Paris Hilton thread(s) for example). But I also think it's perfectly OK to discuss whether or not you find a person attractive. Even if the answer is a "no."

Also I'm not sure a boob job is any different than buying an ugly shirt.

Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 16:59 (twenty-one years ago)

i mean tuomas you can't seriously advocate a loosening of social standards/conditions that lead to massive amounts of the population feeling bad about their bodies while at the same saying that the people inherently involved with the mass communication of those societal standards/conditions should be free of criticism! that's amazing in its incoherence, to me.


I think everyone should look like they do without any sort of pressures coming from any direction. But if someone is actively advocating the current appearance standards, that's a whole different thing. However, I think the celebrities most mocked are the "fat" and the "ugly" ones rather than good-looking ones, which is just enforcing the standards.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:01 (twenty-one years ago)

right, well, see tuomas, renee ain't fat.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)

There is a certain amount of hate embedded in some people's comments about celebrities' looks that is kind of sad. Or when someone says that someone else's ass is fat and they weigh 100 pounds.

bob n0pe (bobnope), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:03 (twenty-one years ago)

even when renee was "fat" for bridget jones, she weren't fat.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:05 (twenty-one years ago)

However, I think the celebrities most mocked are the "fat" and the "ugly" ones rather than good-looking ones, which is just enforcing the standards.

Yeah, like Paris "Tub Tub" Hilton, The Walking Buttface.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:06 (twenty-one years ago)

right, well, see tuomas, renee ain't fat.

I just used her an example of people mocking something someone has no control over - i.e. her face. I wasn't talking about her weight.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)

stence, I think he put "fat" in quotes for a reason. But it's a mute point because everyone on the Renee thread was saying they liked "fat" Renee better than the "thin" Renee!

I think Tuomas gets a different version of ILX than I do :(

Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Dan, I mean mocked for their appearance. Criticizing celebrities for their actions is a whole different issue.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Uh, hello, price of fame? (Sorry, I mean Dan Perry's first post OTM.)

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, I think at various points in this thread people have been acting like calling a stranger fat to their face is the same thing as making fun of a celebrity on TV in your own home. It's not even the same thing as a late-night talk show making fun of them.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Tuomas, did you read my post? The part where I talked about the anorexic cracks about Paris Hilton? Have you read ILX? The people who call Paris Hilton a praying mantis?

Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)

"fat" renee just looks a normal cutie pie gal to me. As a highly paid actress, she has control over her face, whether through performance skill or surgery.

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought Paris Hilton dissed because she did some porn video... I have no idea how she looks like.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:13 (twenty-one years ago)

anyway my point about power structures and whatnot stands, and as usual tuomas ducks. you can't have one without the other.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Hahahahaha "through performance skill"! Awesome!

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Who cares if someone did a (private, supposedly accidentally released to public) porn video? Why does that make it ok to ridicule someone?

Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:14 (twenty-one years ago)

How did I "duck", Hstecil? I answered your question, It's right there under your post.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Wait, by Tuomas' logic, since weight is controlable, we're then free to mock away teh fatties??? What about serial killers and crack whores?

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Who cares if someone did a (private, supposedly accidentally released to public) porn video? Why does that make it ok to ridicule someone?

I didn't say it's ok. I just thought that was the reason she was ridiculed, not her appearance.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost tuomas- because your answer didn't make much sense, nor really address my point, nor offer any sort of real "solution" to what you perceive to be the "problem," nor show any real understanding that power is not merely a top-down relationship.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)

ie. if you don't think societal standards are ok, that's fine, but then going ahead and participating in that society without trying to change it in anyway seems a bit silly to me.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Tuomas, I think what is necessary here is for you to define who are the "fat" and "ugly" celebrities being mocked. This is a list of celebrities, off the top of my head, who have been, er, mocked on ILX recently, purely for appearance based reasons:

Paris Hilton
Renee Zellwegger
Tobey Maguire
Britney Spears
Lindsay Lohan
Nicole Richie

Who in this group is the ugly one?

Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:19 (twenty-one years ago)

because y'know, it's us uncomfortable-with-nipple-hair dudes who are the real oppressors, not people like renee zellweger who do everything to foist their images on the public. sure.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh and Alyssa Milano

Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:19 (twenty-one years ago)

because, y'know, celebrities are just hopeless, powerless individuals and don't make any of the decisions surrounding what they actually do.

and kurt cobain was a saint.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Wait, by Tuomas' logic, since weight is controlable, we're then free to mock away teh fatties???

Er, just because I said you shouldn't mock someone's appearance, especially the things she has no control over, doesn't mean I think you can ridicule the things she can control.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)

(Tobey Maguire, because like the others he has breasts but unlike the others he also has a penis)

The Ghost of Not Helping, Sorry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I think of judging celebrities as sort of a healthy outlet for this type of thing. Everyone knows who they are so it makes for a good discussion topic, and barring extraordinary circumstances the celebrities in question aren't going to hear about it or have their feelings hurt.

We all instinctually make judgements about other people's attractiveness, and I think it's exactly BECAUSE we would feel bad saying these things about friends or real-life strangers that it's okay to do it with celebrities who trade on their public (PUBLIC!) image.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:22 (twenty-one years ago)

What if you think being overweight is a terrible health issue and you are expressing concern for them, the way one would express concern about boob jobs or anorexia?

xpost HAHAHAHAHA

Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Being famous is a disease.

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

(Tobey Maguire, because like the others he has breasts but unlike the others he also has a penis)

But he has a HUGE penis!

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Hstencil, don't twist my words. I said, if celebrities actively advocate the current beauty standards, then that's worthy of criticism. What's not worthy is criticizing something they were born with, or criticizing celebrities who deviate from the standards. And I'm talking about this on a general level, not on ILX level - I'm not saying ILX is mocking the fatties and the ugly birds.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought if you had really big breasts you could get away with being a little fat.

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:26 (twenty-one years ago)

What does that mean? "Actively advocate the current beauty standards"?

Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:27 (twenty-one years ago)

(This is in response to the Renee Zellweger thread and other similar ones.)

It is not unreasonable for the casual or the invested reader to assume that your initial question was, in fact, about ILX, considering this bit of the initial post.

I thought if you had really big breasts you could get away with being a little fat.

So if Tobey gets implants, it will all be okay?

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)

it's all about balance

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Huge implants + huge dick + both on same person = you people are getting way too close to pornographic comic books.

Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:31 (twenty-one years ago)

tuomas the nature of being a celebrity is to advocate for beauty standards!

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Just because I said you shouldn't mock someone's appearance, especially the things she has no control over, doesn't mean I think you can ridicule the things she can control.

Tuomas, I'm getting the feeling that you're just anti-ridicule.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:32 (twenty-one years ago)

What does that mean? "Actively advocate the current beauty standards"?

Saying they need to get thinner when they're normal weight, saying they think they look good when they appear anorectic, appearing in airbrushed publicity pics, getting boob jobs to improve their career, etc.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:32 (twenty-one years ago)

the day renee or some other celebrity admonishes "people" magazine for being on one of those "50 most beautiful people" lists is the day i move to finland.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:33 (twenty-one years ago)

people who's purpose is to be looked at being judged by how they look SEXY SHOCKAH
but, yeah, the "gay mafia" needs to chill with their war against women

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:33 (twenty-one years ago)

tuomas the nature of being a celebrity is to advocate for beauty standards!

Does Roseane Barr advocate them? Or Whoopi Goldberg? Or Tilda Swinton?

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)

yes! also roseanne barr ain't really a good example since she doesn't work any more.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:35 (twenty-one years ago)

but even she tried to thin down and got tons of ridiculous surgery!!!

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:35 (twenty-one years ago)

i got ten times the google hits for "tilda swinton beautiful" than for "tilda swinton ugly"

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)

also, whoopi = blue contacts

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)

What about serial killers and crack whores?

best not to mock the (unjailed) serial killers; makes 'em grumpy.

on another note, are we still allowed to mock Tara Reid?

kf, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)

we mock tara reid because she's drunk, just like us.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Saying they need to get thinner when they're normal weight, saying they think they look good when they appear anorectic, appearing in airbrushed publicity pics, getting boob jobs to improve their career, etc.

You have just described virtually every single celebrity in Hollywood today.

Actually with the airbrushing thing, you've described every last one of them.

Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)

TARA REID MOCKING? HELLS YES

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:39 (twenty-one years ago)

That boob job was so poorly done for reasons besides the Frankennipple, it's kind of sad.

Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:40 (twenty-one years ago)

i think i admire tara reid, honestly.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:40 (twenty-one years ago)

at least she's a drunk

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)

If we drew a frown on her belly, her entire torso could be a gigantic winking frowny face.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I think of judging celebrities as sort of a healthy outlet for this type of thing. Everyone knows who they are so it makes for a good discussion topic, and barring extraordinary circumstances the celebrities in question aren't going to hear about it or have their feelings hurt.

There was the case in which a confirmed Madonna stalker was hiding out on a Madonna board. Obsession isn't healthy, and if an obsessive can't get at their primary target, they may strike out at someone in proximity to them.

bob n0pe (bobnope), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

only tara reid has had the cojones (ahem) to expose the ugly hollywood truth for what it is! ie. frankennipples.

hstencil (hstencil), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Barthes to thread. The thing is, I find the whole moaning and groaning that actors/actresses do - f.e. Reese Whiterspoon and Cameron Diaz photographing and attacking photographers - to be ridiculous. Why do they become actors/actresses? They *know* what that entails. They want the money but oh golly they don't want the drawbacks. (And a million others still have to be busboys dreaming to have the lives they lead.) There are enough *famous* people who are not dogged by photographers simply because they don't live smack dab in the middle of Hollywood/Beverly Hills. Famous people are they new gods, they have to be perfect, they have to adhere to our rules. If they are perfect we revere them (and might be slightly jealous of them). If they falter we mock them or realize they are human after all.

Yet I cringe when I visit message boards because so many posters are soooooo frigging nasty. "Oh man, her boobs are sagging!" "Katie Holmes has herpes! Eww!!!!" You wish you had sagging breasts like Tara, you'd probably fondle them 24/7 instead of posting such horrible comments.

nathalie's baby (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)

THAT'S WHAT WENT WRONG WITH HER BOOB JOB! Cojones.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Um I don't think cracking jokes about a celebrity's blow job face on a non-dedicated board is anywhere near the case you've mentioned, bob.

xpost err Tara's boobs ain't gonna be sagging anywhere any time soon.

Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Tommy Lee's cojones duh.

nathalie's baby (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Tara Reid falls into my group of celebrities like Pam Anderson and Carmen Electra who I think are unfairly maligned for "advocating the beauty standard." I mean, yeah they've done all this shit to themselves to appear to be cartoon characters but they aren't trying to fool anyone, they're pretty open about their lifestyles and their choices which I think is pretty cool.

Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:47 (twenty-one years ago)

You have just described virtually every single celebrity in Hollywood today.

Actually with the airbrushing thing, you've described every last one of them.

I know. I never said Hollywood stars are innocent. But if you want to criticize them, do it for the right things.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:48 (twenty-one years ago)

did anybody else read "A Massive Swelling: Celebrity as a Disease" or somesuch?

kf, Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:48 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.salon.com/people/col/cintra/1999/07/28/cho/

do you mean this articke?

nathalie's baby (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:50 (twenty-one years ago)

is that that cintra wilson book? no.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:50 (twenty-one years ago)

OK Tuomas I find your anti-ridicule stance very admirable but saying it's ok to make fun of a celebrity's boob job or some other very specific complaint that "hurts society" somehow but it's not ok to say "Oh you know what, I don't really fancy that Julia Roberts, I know everyone else thinks she's pretty cute but I think her nose is wonky"... I mean, what hstencil said about celebrities being part numero uno about the beauty standard.

This doesn't make sense. Either you can say you dislike a person's appearance or you can't. You cannot throw out caveats like that, that you shouldn't make fun of a person's appearance UNLESS you think they are too skinny, or you believe their breasts are fake, or you think they got a nose job.

Allyzay flies casual (allyzay), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost err Tara's boobs ain't gonna be sagging anywhere any time soon.

-- Allyzay flies casual (allyza...) (webmail), June 7th, 2005. (link)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tommy Lee's cojones duh.

-- nathalie's baby (stevienixe...) (webmail), June 7th, 2005. (link)

The Ghost of XPost Heaven (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

barring extraordinary circumstances the celebrities in question aren't going to hear about it or have their feelings hurt.

There was the case in which a confirmed Madonna stalker was hiding out on a Madonna board. Obsession isn't healthy, and if an obsessive can't get at their primary target, they may strike out at someone in proximity to them.

WTF, Bob. A) I'd say that's a pretty extraordinary circumstance B) That's completely different from discussing whether celebrities are hott or not, and C) I'd say a Madonna board is a pretty natural place for a Madonna stalker

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 17:58 (twenty-one years ago)

http://j-walkblog.com/old/images/mated2.jpg

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 18:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Saying they need to get thinner when they're normal weight, saying they think they look good when they appear anorectic.

B-but does this statement not contain highly subjective implicit judgments wrt what looks "normal and good"?

But if you want to criticize them, do it for the right things.

Tuomas, much as I might disagree with it in principle, a blanket anti-ridicule stance is at least consistent. This selective ridicule position strikes me as naive at best, fascist at worst, and dangerous in all cases.

Nonetheless, I'll await instruction from the Wise and Benevolent Central Committee (Robust Blonde Division) wrt which physical characteristics are approved for critique this month.

rogermexico (rogermexico), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 18:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Is it wrong of me to point out that the Ford + Flockhart result pic kind of looks like Wendy Carlos?

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)

hahaha

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 7 June 2005 19:42 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.