― Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:44 (nineteen years ago)
― dabnis coleman's ghost (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:48 (nineteen years ago)
― luna (luna.c), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:48 (nineteen years ago)
― dabnis coleman's ghost (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:50 (nineteen years ago)
and a leash on a ski slope is not exactly the same thing.
― Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:52 (nineteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:54 (nineteen years ago)
― 'you' vs. 'radio gnome invisible 3' FITE (ex machina), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:55 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.angelfire.com/in2/dandee/
http://babies1st.com/by1354.html
http://shop.store.yahoo.com/kidsstuff/g120-loopleash.html
― StanM (StanM), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:55 (nineteen years ago)
"lol"
― Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:56 (nineteen years ago)
― maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:56 (nineteen years ago)
― kephm (kephm), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:01 (nineteen years ago)
― luna (luna.c), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:01 (nineteen years ago)
besides, you can make that argument about other, less comical things and it wouldnt be pretty.
― Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:03 (nineteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:03 (nineteen years ago)
― dabnis coleman's ghost (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:03 (nineteen years ago)
― maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Stone Monkey (Stone Monkey), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:07 (nineteen years ago)
While I agree with stan about paranoia there are many things that could happen to a child in a busy store or public area: get lost; abduction; maybe taking things off store shelves and putting them in their mouths. . the list is endless.
I imagine a 'tether' would give the parent one less thing to worry about while in busy public places.
― Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:09 (nineteen years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:11 (nineteen years ago)
― maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:15 (nineteen years ago)
as long as you keep your child by your side, or under your vision that should be it. i'm gonna go out on a limb here and say most parents dont use these things and they get by, right? this just looks STUPID and is just that. kids are not dogs. also, even with this leash, if the parents look the other way the kid can still take things off shelves and put things in their mouth etc.
btw, how do you quote people like that? i
― Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:16 (nineteen years ago)
― M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:24 (nineteen years ago)
You use brackets like this: <i>quote</i> (see the FAQ link below for more)
― StanM (StanM), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:30 (nineteen years ago)
thanks StanM!
― Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:31 (nineteen years ago)
― I do feel guilty for getting any perverse amusement out of it (Rock Hardy), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:35 (nineteen years ago)
I have yet to forgive her for buying it or myself for using it.
(Although in retrospect, it must have looked pretty funny).
― luna (luna.c), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:36 (nineteen years ago)
short leash. like I'm having to use with my young dog. Don't know if the choke training collar would also apply.
I do think it looks silly but that's probably only b/c it's something rarely seen. If it were more common, I doubt it would look odd. I wouldn't criticze the parents b/c you don't know what the situation is with their child. There could have been a frightening incident in the past (like with Maria's brother) or the child could have emotional/behavorial disorders that make him very hard to control in public.
whatever. far more distressing to me is when I see a child hit/spanked in public.
― Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:39 (nineteen years ago)
OTM
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:46 (nineteen years ago)
― luna (luna.c), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:51 (nineteen years ago)
I went into teaching anti-spanking and came out unsure about how I felt. But doing it in public (or in front of their classmates/friends) is unneccesarily humilating.
― Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Thursday, 1 December 2005 19:02 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 1 December 2005 19:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Thursday, 1 December 2005 19:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 1 December 2005 19:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 19:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Lisa Lipstick, Thursday, 1 December 2005 21:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:13 (nineteen years ago)
IT'S NEW TO ME!!!!!
― Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:23 (nineteen years ago)
I completely disagree.
― luna (luna.c), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:32 (nineteen years ago)
― jim p. irrelevant (electricsound), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:33 (nineteen years ago)
OTM my arse. They got cars where you live? My youngest ran about like a nutcase for a few months and had no road sense whatsoever. Giving him a calm sensible lecture is all well and good but it's difficult for him to realise the consequences of running in front of a car. If he wasn't on a 'leash' I would have ended up chasing him everywhere and living in perpetual fear of him being run over. Getting hit by a car might have taught him a lesson, but only if he survived it.
It's easy to say it's my fault for not teaching him road safety well enough. Even if that's the case it doesn't make it right to allow him to be fucking killed.
It's my fault officer, I couldn't get him to understand 'stop, look and listen'.Why didn't you restrain him?Because someone on ILX said it was an appalling example of lazy parenting and some other people thought it loked a bit embarrassing. I figured letting the poor kid die was the only option.
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:35 (nineteen years ago)
Too bad cause I probably wont be able to stop when/if I these freakish things again.
― Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:37 (nineteen years ago)
― autovac (autovac), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:51 (nineteen years ago)
The phrase LAUGHABLY FUCKING NAIVE LACK OF EXPERIENCE would spring to mind here if I was the bolshy type.
― Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:51 (nineteen years ago)
i think that's called 'parenting'Don't make a sanctimonious arse of yourself.
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan (Judging: It's What's For Dinner!) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan (Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Click Here) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:04 (nineteen years ago)
. however, mine is just taking her first steps so i may have to revise that opinion in a few months
Relatively open mind for a nanosecond there, just before she explained to me why I'm a bad man for looking after my son.
xpost
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:04 (nineteen years ago)
I typed a whole answer as justifying circumstances, but I'm out.
― Hunter (Hunter), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:04 (nineteen years ago)
i have one daughter (9 months) and i care for my neice and nephew (4 and 2) 45-50 hours a week. we often go grocery shopping and running errands throughout the day and i never have needed a leash. i don't think that is due to my super human abilities.
and i don't think that anyone is a 'bad man' for using a leash. to each his own. i do feel that it is lazy and it is not necessary. sorry if i have crushed your self esteem.
― Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan (Suck On That, BF Skinner!) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:12 (nineteen years ago)
The conjunction of these two sentences made my head blow up.
― Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:12 (nineteen years ago)
I say that granting that in the other 20% of cases you will, yes, see either (a) the sad spectacle of a perfectly orderly kid nonetheless tethered, presumably out of paranoia, and sometimes at disturbingly advanced ages, or (b) worse, the parent who stands there having a long conversation or paying attention to something else entirely, while, at the end of the leash, the child runs around raising hell. (I guess people do this with very small dogs, as well.) Which is dumb, for the obvious reasons, and also dangerous, because relying on the leash as some kind of magical protection will, yeah, not keep the kid from eating thumbtacks, punching strangers in the nuts, or trying to hug vicious dogs.
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:12 (nineteen years ago)
There is a day care close to DU, in the mornings I see them taking the kids for a walk on the low traffic semi-urban sidewalks when the weather allows. These are 3 year olds it looks like They are either holding onto, or somehow affixed to a 10 yard long run of webbing, 2 abreast by maybe 8 kids long. I'm here to say. One kid on a leash: demeaning oppression. 16 kid toddler chaingang: TOTALLY TWEE-DORABLE! Will add, they always seem happy enough. Now MUSH!
― Hunter (Hunter), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:13 (nineteen years ago)
you should attach a hamster water bottle to its cage and i am sure it will thrive.
― Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:14 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:16 (nineteen years ago)
OH NOES IM A BAD LAZY PERANT!!!
― Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:18 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:19 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.pharmacyseek.com/images/meds/ritalin.jpg
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:20 (nineteen years ago)
YEEHAW!! ROUND UP DEM LITTLE DOGIES!!!!
― Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:20 (nineteen years ago)
didn't we have a "what will a middle-aged ILX argue about" thread?
― kingfish hobo juckie (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:21 (nineteen years ago)
i am not saying that the RARE circumstance does not exist that would warrant such a contraption. perhaps that is true for onimo. it just seems that many who enlist the device do so because they would rather tie the child to their person than be bothered to pay enough attention to keep hold of them. they seem to be overused. like television/kid's videos, i guess.
― Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:24 (nineteen years ago)
LOOK AT THIS MISERABLE DEGRADED CHIDL
― Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Dan (Curious) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Hunter (Hunter), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:29 (nineteen years ago)
Really? I only see a kid on a leash maybe once every couple of years. I think if they were very commonplace they wouldn't seem strange at all but the novelty of it makes it seem unnecessary.
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:33 (nineteen years ago)
Give a child matches and he is an arsonist for a day.
Give a child a lighter and he is an arsonist for a week.
But teach a child to start fires with nothing but two sticks and some string and he may be an arsonist for the rest of his life.
― M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:33 (nineteen years ago)
Show me the studies that show that these child harnesses are damaging to children; until you do, the two examples are more equivalent than dissimilar.
― Dan (Kids Need Exercise, Putting Them In A Car Is Just Lazy) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Bea (And I Would Have Gotten Away With It If IT Wasn't For Those Meddling Kids) , Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:40 (nineteen years ago)
― jim p. irrelevant (electricsound), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:41 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:53 (nineteen years ago)
I bet people who put leashes on their kids put humiliating sweaters on their dogs.
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:58 (nineteen years ago)
I don't have kids, but I was one myself once, and I think I can safely say I could have lived with having been attached to my parents for a while rather than being another roadkill statistic. (My parents were exceptionally good at parenting, as far as I'm concerned, taught me right from wrong, all that malarkey, and I have no idea whether I was reined or not - presumably not as I would still be bearing the mental scars of such brutal degradation)
Incidentally, what's wrong with children's TV?
― ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 2 December 2005 00:46 (nineteen years ago)
This is what I expected to be in the hatch on Lost. Would've been far more interesting.
― Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Friday, 2 December 2005 01:08 (nineteen years ago)
As indeed, I did (what with the alternative being not living and everything). God, my vocabulary is pathetic at times. Perhaps my parents should have tethered me to a thesaurus.
― ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 2 December 2005 01:11 (nineteen years ago)
― JimD (JimD), Friday, 2 December 2005 01:21 (nineteen years ago)
I see no problem w/ it generally-- wisely used and where age appropriate.
― Hunter (Hunter), Friday, 2 December 2005 01:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Friday, 2 December 2005 04:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Rebekkah (burntbrat), Friday, 2 December 2005 04:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Hunter (Hunter), Friday, 2 December 2005 04:41 (nineteen years ago)
Other news: my Mum used to tie me to the mattress at night. No, really. I used to keep standing up in my cot and crying because I couldn't get back down again so Mum made a special sleeping bag for me which attached to the mattress and made me feel secure. Even now, I adore getting into a bed with sheets tucked in really tightly because it gives me the same feeling of security.
― Mädchen (Madchen), Friday, 2 December 2005 09:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Mädchen (Madchen), Friday, 2 December 2005 10:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Concerned Of Tabloid Land (GerryNemo), Friday, 2 December 2005 10:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Sailor Kitten (g-kit), Friday, 2 December 2005 10:24 (nineteen years ago)
― James Ward (jamesmichaelward), Friday, 2 December 2005 10:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Friday, 2 December 2005 10:28 (nineteen years ago)
Anyway, she took two steps, then raised her arm as if to say "Remove this!" and stood rock still. There was no moving her. So we removed it and never used it again.
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 2 December 2005 10:52 (nineteen years ago)
Not sure if this was an isolated case due to the straps being too long or whether it was a real concern at the time...
― Rumpie (lil drummer girl parumpumpumpu), Friday, 2 December 2005 11:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Anna (Anna), Friday, 2 December 2005 13:55 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.woofbrothers.com/files/images/thumbs/t_28.jpg
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Friday, 2 December 2005 14:05 (nineteen years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Friday, 2 December 2005 14:12 (nineteen years ago)
Cunning small daughter quickly realised that she could remove her end of the velcro wrist strap and attach it to an immovable object (iron railings, car door handle etc) when my attention was distracted for the merest nanosecond, thus leaving me tethered and her free to run away.
― C J (C J), Friday, 2 December 2005 14:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Friday, 2 December 2005 14:23 (nineteen years ago)
i think they are apalling and a tool for lazy parenting.
onimo's reply totally totally otm. actually, onimo otm on whole thread.
i really don't think it's necessarily to do w how much attention you pay your kid. i know i was paid an absolutely mental amount of attention when i were a babby, but to keep me safe while making sure i didn't, you know, DIE, i was kept on a lead when out in public, for ages. and we lived in a tiny village. um, obv they can be misused. but i would guess anyone having a prob wrt the misuse of leads for kids would have a few other bigger probs to sort out first.
Wot is the big deal here? This idea that leashes is "degrading" is weird. I mean, they're degrading if you put them on an Iraqi prisoner, sure, but their primary function is not to degrade. Are people trying to humiliate their dogs? No, they're trying to keep some control over an animal with a tendency to wander, while still allowing them some freedom of movement. Same deal with a kid. Giving them a few feet of walking space seems a hell of a lot less oppressive than strapping them tight into a stroller. Our kid isn't quite to walking yet and we haven't thought about whether to ever use a kid-leash, but I wouldn't rule it out. And holding the end of a leash is no lazier than holding a hand, as long as you're keeping a close eye on things.
YES YES YES.
― emsk ( emsk), Sunday, 4 December 2005 03:41 (nineteen years ago)
― emsk ( emsk), Sunday, 4 December 2005 03:51 (nineteen years ago)
― emsk ( emsk), Sunday, 4 December 2005 03:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Hunter (Hunter), Sunday, 4 December 2005 04:29 (nineteen years ago)
See, apart from Emily beating down on people she doesn't know, with kids she doesn't know, about their parenting abilities based on her smug self-imposed moral superiority, THIS is the worst thing on this thread.
Sorry if I'm missing something, Nathalie, but are you saying that if a kid pushes you to breaking point then it's justifiable to lash out at them? I'm not anti-smacking at all (OH NOES, BAD POTENTIAL PARENT ALERT!! What with agreement with the use of reins and everything, perhaps I should be sterilised now for the good of humankind), but physical punishment (not violence) should be delivered in a measured and controlled way, with reasons for your actions being given to the kid so that they realise WHY they are being punished. This is what my dad did to me, he hated doing it, but it did me good in the long run and I bear no mental scarring from it. Not by lashing out when the little brats get too much for you to deal with rationally.
I may have misinterpreted this (I know English isn't your first language, so it may have looked worse than you intended), but I thought it needed saying.
― ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 4 December 2005 11:05 (nineteen years ago)
Hey, it's all a matter of opinion. Am I wrong or right? Fuck knows. See, I could see one child benefiting from a slap; but personally I don't wanna risk it. :-)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Sunday, 4 December 2005 11:34 (nineteen years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 4 December 2005 11:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Sunday, 4 December 2005 18:01 (nineteen years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 4 December 2005 19:22 (nineteen years ago)
Tethers, leashes, and leads are to be used only for animals and balloons.
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:32 (nineteen years ago)
We walked through the shopping mall down her way (very crowded, parents and kids everywhere) and I counted at least six kids wearing reins. How uncomforatable and awkward must it be for a parent to walk stooped holding a childs hand? That or a pushchair would be the only alternative to reins because it would be IMPOSSIBLE to stop your child getting lost in such an environment otherwise.
― Rumpie (lil drummer girl parumpumpumpu), Monday, 5 December 2005 09:43 (nineteen years ago)
Old people don't tend to run so fast do they?
― James Ward (jamesmichaelward), Monday, 5 December 2005 09:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 5 December 2005 09:58 (nineteen years ago)
Very. I'm about six foot tall, our little boy is about two foot. So I would need like four foot long arms to make it remotely comfortable. That said, you'd have to be some sort of glutton for punishment to take your toddler round the shopping mall anyhow. Take them to the woods instead and let them run around like nutters, says I.
― NickB (NickB), Monday, 5 December 2005 10:07 (nineteen years ago)
In the 16th century. (images seem to be unavailable or protected, but the article is accessible)
― StanM (StanM), Monday, 5 December 2005 10:28 (nineteen years ago)
i used to babysit a lot and it was the first time in my life i was ever really selfless -- they weren't even my kids but as long as they were nearby, they were in the front of my brain ALL THE TIME, always in my line of vision. i can see myself being a good parent, better than most parents probably, but boy oh boy, what kind of life would i have if i were in that hyper-vigilant role 24/7/365?
so i dunno. i'm on the fence.
― mies van der rohffle (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 5 December 2005 10:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Mädchen (Madchen), Monday, 5 December 2005 12:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Rumpie (lil drummer girl parumpumpumpu), Monday, 5 December 2005 12:30 (nineteen years ago)
Is it bad for a baby to see you masturbating?
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 13:04 (nineteen years ago)
I say this as a speaker of two other languages who has frequently picked up all kinds of bad/rude expressions without fully understanding what they mean. That's what happens when you spend the majority of your year abroad in the pub :)
― Mädchen (Madchen), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:10 (nineteen years ago)
― mies van der rohffle (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:23 (nineteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:27 (nineteen years ago)
hehe it's funny you say that, because whilst i was in hong kong i noticed that (and this is true in america too actually coming to think of it) there were so many drinking establishments that called themselves 'pubs', when they were clearly bars!!
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:29 (nineteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:32 (nineteen years ago)
― James Ward (jamesmichaelward), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 5 December 2005 16:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Monday, 5 December 2005 16:54 (nineteen years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 16:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 20:19 (eighteen years ago)
*applauds*
― ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 21:55 (eighteen years ago)
― Jaq (Jaq), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 22:01 (eighteen years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 22:16 (eighteen years ago)
Oh I'm sure he did something worthy of caging. David's just happy to be off the leash.
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 22:32 (eighteen years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 00:01 (eighteen years ago)
― Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 00:27 (eighteen years ago)
― miele kitty (miele), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 02:52 (eighteen years ago)
Had my mother not leashed me on our vacations, I'd likely still be stuck in the gears of Mr. Toad's Wild Ride, presumed long-since abducted by some pervert with balloons, or perhaps be scrambling around the scaffolding of space mountain, hidden by darkness, a sickly forsaken Gollum-like creature. I wasn't a bad kid, but I was utterly oblivious. I wouldn't ditch my parents purposefully, I'd just wander off, usually looking in any direction but the one in which I was headed (so I've been told). In my job now I see lots of families, and a similar lack of awareness from the kids. They're not being bold or intentionally difficult -- usually they'll relax for a while when asked -- but they don't yet have the self-discipline to maintain this themselves for very long. They just start running around again. They also don't understand what the risks they're taking are. In that sense keeping them close = keeping them safe, in exactly the same way that setting a curfew, and keeping them inside (surely a more drastic, though more accepted, limitation) is a sensible idea. Someday I hope to tie a child to a piece of leather.
― A Giant Mechanical Ant (The Giant Mechanical Ant), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 04:25 (eighteen years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 04:34 (eighteen years ago)
It probably is marginally less safe than holding hands, but if the adult is spending half the time shaking the feeling back into their arm then holding hands isn't really comparable.
― A Giant Mechanical Ant (The Giant Mechanical Ant), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 05:09 (eighteen years ago)
― Revivalist (Revivalist), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 12:06 (eighteen years ago)
http://au.geocities.com/safety4baby/images/ToddlerReins.jpg
but just like a dog-leash.
This was at the football on a busy staircase where 34 year old me and 35 year old Onimo once got separated by the crowd, so, yeah, still necessary for hanging onto toddlers you don't want disappearing.
― ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 28 January 2007 12:40 (eighteen years ago)
― StanM (StanM), Sunday, 28 January 2007 13:04 (eighteen years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 28 January 2007 13:11 (eighteen years ago)
I used to think leashes were absurd, but when I read shit like this it makes me think otherwise.
-- Andrew (n...), June 28th, 2006 3:27 AM. (enneff) (link)
(Except, what are the chances? Do they really justify being paranoid 24/7?)
― StanM (StanM), Sunday, 28 January 2007 13:18 (eighteen years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 28 January 2007 13:40 (eighteen years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 28 January 2007 13:41 (eighteen years ago)
― aimurchie (aimurchie), Sunday, 28 January 2007 14:46 (eighteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Sunday, 28 January 2007 16:46 (eighteen years ago)
"stop being ridiculous" eh? ok then ;-)
― StanM (StanM), Sunday, 28 January 2007 17:12 (eighteen years ago)
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/178/372087383_2b726fa5b2.jpg
― onimo (onimo), Sunday, 28 January 2007 17:37 (eighteen years ago)
― jennyjennyjenny (pullapartgirl), Sunday, 28 January 2007 19:24 (eighteen years ago)
(I just came across this on random, and wanted to mention about the kid I saw on a leash in a necessary situation. Anyone wanting to reiterate themselves, feel free. I stand by everything I said upthread)
― ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 28 January 2007 20:02 (eighteen years ago)
― A B C (sparklecock), Sunday, 28 January 2007 20:12 (eighteen years ago)
The humiliation aspect: I remember my mum looking after a friend's kid, aged about 5 or 6, and threatening him that if he didn't behave when walking home from the village, she would put him on the reins (which she'd kept from when I was small). She only had to take them with her and show him, for him to immediately start behaving himself.
― Forest Pines (ForestPines), Sunday, 28 January 2007 20:23 (eighteen years ago)
― aimurchie (aimurchie), Sunday, 28 January 2007 20:31 (eighteen years ago)
― chaki (chaki), Sunday, 28 January 2007 21:34 (eighteen years ago)
― Mädchen (Madchen), Monday, 29 January 2007 17:07 (eighteen years ago)
― Mädchen (Madchen), Monday, 29 January 2007 17:08 (eighteen years ago)
Sheesh, Ailsa, you always take people seriously,don't you? He said:"(Except, what are the chances? Do they really justify being paranoid 24/7?)" He wasn't talking about leashing the kid all the time. Or maybe I didn't understand correctly...
Anyway, use whatever you want if it means keeping your kid safe. A leash will hardly hurt a kid (emotionally nor physically). People should give it a fucking rest, what with pushing their opinoins on others thinking that's the way it should be. Parenting is a hard job, an accident can quickly happen. If a leash can prevent that, why not use it?
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 14:07 (eighteen years ago)
We have one of these! Flickr friends will know how adorable Ava looks in it.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 15:41 (eighteen years ago)