When did parents start using leashes on their kids?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I was at Borders right next to Chapel Market in London, sitting on a stack of books reading NME as I saw a mother walking her kid with a god damn LEASH. I'm not shitting you. A leash, just like a dog. It's one of the weirdest things I've ever seen. I tried my best not to start laughing out loud but I didnt do a very good job.

Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:44 (nineteen years ago)

this is at least a decade old.

dabnis coleman's ghost (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:48 (nineteen years ago)

My parents had them for us when we were little, so at least 30+ years ago.

luna (luna.c), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:48 (nineteen years ago)

http://rasc.ru/school/kid-ski_files/ski_leash.jpg

dabnis coleman's ghost (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:50 (nineteen years ago)

are you guys serious? i have never heard of that before. the idea is just so absurd to me. maybe it's an american/british thing...

and a leash on a ski slope is not exactly the same thing.

Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:52 (nineteen years ago)

At least it's not as bad as during the Middle Ages, when they used leeches.

StanM (StanM), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:53 (nineteen years ago)

my grandmother has recounted using them on my father so that's at least 50+ years.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:53 (nineteen years ago)

We used to call them 'reins'. Even weirder, when you think about it.

Archel (Archel), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:54 (nineteen years ago)

http://us.st11.yimg.com/store1.yimg.com/I/dmart2_1869_136940104

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:54 (nineteen years ago)

Convenient tote handle!

'you' vs. 'radio gnome invisible 3' FITE (ex machina), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:55 (nineteen years ago)

They're a pretty standard child safety thing:

http://www.angelfire.com/in2/dandee/

http://babies1st.com/by1354.html

http://shop.store.yahoo.com/kidsstuff/g120-loopleash.html

StanM (StanM), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:55 (nineteen years ago)

but what is the purpose of these silly things? do they fear that the kid is going to run away from them, or attack strangers like a dog?

"lol"

Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:56 (nineteen years ago)

my mom definitely used one on my brother.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:56 (nineteen years ago)

kids wander off all the time. at least the mom didnt have whistle, i saw that once

kephm (kephm), Thursday, 1 December 2005 17:58 (nineteen years ago)

oh, come on. there's no need whatsoever for these things. it's degrading. but it was cause for great laughter and i am thankful for that. seriously, i had a real "WTF??!" moment when i saw them.

Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:01 (nineteen years ago)

very very little is degrading to a toddler.

luna (luna.c), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:01 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, i know. but still. there is just something very wrong about it.

besides, you can make that argument about other, less comical things and it wouldnt be pretty.

Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:03 (nineteen years ago)

Parents of today are paranoid: like every child that leaves their field of vision for half a second is sure to be paedophiled by a terrorist or terrorized by a paedophile or something.

StanM (StanM), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:03 (nineteen years ago)

i'm hoping for a giant hamster bubble for my kids

dabnis coleman's ghost (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:03 (nineteen years ago)

the reason my mother bought a leash was due to a weekend when the family went away skiing. my brother wandered off and we couldnt find him for a day. searched the entire resort, police were called, etc etc. you know where he was? he was in one of those sit down video games.

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:06 (nineteen years ago)

The escaping child thing is pretty much it. Personally, given how fucking horrible I think small children are the idea of keeping the little buggers on a leash seems quite apropos...

Stone Monkey (Stone Monkey), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:07 (nineteen years ago)

oh, come on. there's no need whatsoever for these things.

While I agree with stan about paranoia there are many things that could happen to a child in a busy store or public area: get lost; abduction; maybe taking things off store shelves and putting them in their mouths. . the list is endless.

I imagine a 'tether' would give the parent one less thing to worry about while in busy public places.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:09 (nineteen years ago)

I don't mind the leashes so much. It's the shock collars and the little gimp masks which unnerve me.

M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:11 (nineteen years ago)

tethering a kid not only gives the parents one less thing to think about but also gives everyone in close proximity a little peace of mind. my parents owned a restaurant and i distinctly recall years of damage toddlers would inflict -- broken displays, things getting knocked over, etc etc -- and the parents wouldnt be ashamed of it. i sound like an old person when i say this but man, people let their children run around like lunatics. of course they should be tied up!

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:13 (nineteen years ago)

i think they are apalling and a tool for lazy parenting. however, mine is just taking her first steps so i may have to revise that opinion in a few months.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:15 (nineteen years ago)

"While I agree with stan about paranoia there are many things that could happen to a child in a busy store or public area: get lost; abduction; maybe taking things off store shelves and putting them in their mouths. . the list is endless."

as long as you keep your child by your side, or under your vision that should be it. i'm gonna go out on a limb here and say most parents dont use these things and they get by, right? this just looks STUPID and is just that. kids are not dogs. also, even with this leash, if the parents look the other way the kid can still take things off shelves and put things in their mouth etc.

btw, how do you quote people like that? i

Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:16 (nineteen years ago)

I am of a mixed mind about these, but if I had a disobedient child with the personality of a hellion, I'm pretty sure I'd get over any misgivings and tether the little darling to my side.

M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:24 (nineteen years ago)

btw, how do you quote people like that?

You use brackets like this: <i>quote</i> (see the FAQ link below for more)

StanM (StanM), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:30 (nineteen years ago)

remember this: the kid is not the only one who would look like a fool :)

thanks StanM!

Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:31 (nineteen years ago)

We didn't use a kid leash with our daughter, but I wouldn't criticize a parent who did. I appreciate parents who make an effort not to let their kid run wild and tear shit up.

I do feel guilty for getting any perverse amusement out of it (Rock Hardy), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:35 (nineteen years ago)

My mom bought me a leash when Spencer was wee, but unfortunately, the one and only time we tried to use it (I was opposed) was while we were at SeaWorld, and it was slightly um, elasticized. Cue toddler trying to escape his mother, mother pulling back ever so slightly on tether, and toddler being pulled off his feet and smashing face first into the concrete.

I have yet to forgive her for buying it or myself for using it.

(Although in retrospect, it must have looked pretty funny).

luna (luna.c), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:36 (nineteen years ago)

even with this leash, if the parents look the other way the kid can still take things off shelves and put things in their mouth etc.

short leash. like I'm having to use with my young dog. Don't know if the choke training collar would also apply.

I do think it looks silly but that's probably only b/c it's something rarely seen. If it were more common, I doubt it would look odd. I wouldn't criticze the parents b/c you don't know what the situation is with their child. There could have been a frightening incident in the past (like with Maria's brother) or the child could have emotional/behavorial disorders that make him very hard to control in public.

whatever. far more distressing to me is when I see a child hit/spanked in public.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:39 (nineteen years ago)

i think they are apalling and a tool for lazy parenting.

OTM

walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:44 (nineteen years ago)

yes, of course. i would never compare the two, miss misery. i've actually never seen a child getting hit/spanked in public.

Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:46 (nineteen years ago)

The screaming at or humiliating a child in public bothers me more than seeing the kid get a swat on the ass. (I'm not condoning beatings, slaps in the face, anything of that nature, but a swat on the butt is sometimes merited).

luna (luna.c), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:51 (nineteen years ago)

yes that would bother me a lot too. I watched a lot of kids get beat when I was a teacher. It was painful on the one hand to see the child upset and hurt but on the other hand they were extremely disruptive/dangerous kids and any help I got in the area of discpline I was grateful for.

I went into teaching anti-spanking and came out unsure about how I felt. But doing it in public (or in front of their classmates/friends) is unneccesarily humilating.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 1 December 2005 18:57 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not sure a kid can find it degrading, maybe only later on. How can a three year old think:"Fuck, i'm being treated like a dog here!!!" I always found it degrading, but now I'm not so sure. What if your kid's hyperactive or what if you have backache? I doubt I'll ever use it though. I always thought this was more a Dutch/German thing to do: I never saw Belgian parents using this, only Dutch or German people. *shrug* Beating in public is however totally wrong. I was very much against it until I had to babysit my cousin for a weekend. After that experience, I realize sometimes the kid just pushes you over the edge.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Thursday, 1 December 2005 19:02 (nineteen years ago)

http://snltranscripts.jt.org/93/pics/93gphillip.jpg

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 1 December 2005 19:14 (nineteen years ago)

Having momentarily lost my son on a crowded beach, I wouldn't scoff at the use of these things.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Thursday, 1 December 2005 19:15 (nineteen years ago)

I get really scared when I lose my boyfriend/friends/companion at a packed show or something. Maybe I should be tethered.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Thursday, 1 December 2005 19:19 (nineteen years ago)

I bet your boyfriend would love that ;)

Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 19:20 (nineteen years ago)

It's not necessarily an evil thing. Parents often hold their child by their hand, right, and instead of having to walk double bent if you're a tall mother/father and the child is short it can be convenient with a leash both for the parent and the kid (allows more space- and they have both of their hands free to touch things). And hey, it's ALWAYS wrong to hit a small child, even "a swat on the ass". Ffs, lift them up and hold them when they are misbehaving if they're too small to talk to.

Lisa Lipstick, Thursday, 1 December 2005 21:59 (nineteen years ago)

Coming soon: when did parents start using those stupid wheeled carts to push their kids around in?

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:02 (nineteen years ago)

Reins have been around forever. I seem to remember that some of the strappy papoose things we've carried our kids around in disassembled into rein - they also attach to some kinds of high chair. If you've got small children who're wanting to start walking in public but are really not into holding hands, or if holding their hand is uncomfortable for some reason, reins are a harmless solution. I think with toddlers it might give them a degree of confidence too sometimes.

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:13 (nineteen years ago)

OK SO THEY'VE BEEN AROUND FOREVER BUT IM NOT AMERICAN NOR BRITISH!!!!!!!!!!

IT'S NEW TO ME!!!!!

Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:23 (nineteen years ago)

And hey, it's ALWAYS wrong to hit a small child, even "a swat on the ass".

I completely disagree.

luna (luna.c), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:28 (nineteen years ago)

My mom isn't American or British, either.

luna (luna.c), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:28 (nineteen years ago)

Well, they dont exist where I'm from and I've never seen them before when I've been in the US or now that I'm living in the UK, or on TV etc. Until now.

Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:32 (nineteen years ago)

you need to get out more

jim p. irrelevant (electricsound), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:33 (nineteen years ago)

(or less, i dunno)

jim p. irrelevant (electricsound), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:33 (nineteen years ago)

i think they are apalling and a tool for lazy parenting.

OTM

OTM my arse. They got cars where you live? My youngest ran about like a nutcase for a few months and had no road sense whatsoever. Giving him a calm sensible lecture is all well and good but it's difficult for him to realise the consequences of running in front of a car. If he wasn't on a 'leash' I would have ended up chasing him everywhere and living in perpetual fear of him being run over. Getting hit by a car might have taught him a lesson, but only if he survived it.

It's easy to say it's my fault for not teaching him road safety well enough. Even if that's the case it doesn't make it right to allow him to be fucking killed.

It's my fault officer, I couldn't get him to understand 'stop, look and listen'.
Why didn't you restrain him?
Because someone on ILX said it was an appalling example of lazy parenting and some other people thought it loked a bit embarrassing. I figured letting the poor kid die was the only option.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:35 (nineteen years ago)

So you're saying they're all over London? Yeah, I must've missed them all the time then.

Too bad cause I probably wont be able to stop when/if I these freakish things again.

Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:37 (nineteen years ago)

stop laughing*

Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:37 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.indiemediamagazine.com/images/articles/20050311082542311_1.jpg

autovac (autovac), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:47 (nineteen years ago)

onimo-you could perhaps hold his hand when walking down the street and limit his exposure to high traffic areas, in addition to the constant safety talk? why is keeping close physical contact with your young and admittedly prone to running child so crazy? yes, you may feel like you are 'chasing him everywhere' but i think that's called 'parenting'. placing artificial safety nets around a child will keep them safe in the short run but shouldn't we consider long term solutions that may not come with a simple retractable rope?

Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:47 (nineteen years ago)

exactly - 'leashing' a child could give them a false sense of security. when they are finally old enough to be 'unleashed', they could run amok with their new-found freedom, unaware of the dangers that exist...

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:51 (nineteen years ago)

Ad hominem arguments are terrible, but have some of you people ever TRIED holding the hand of a toddler hepped up on the excitement of walking in a busy street, whilst ignorant bastards jostle round you on all sides, and you might well have other things going on to break your concentration because you're just trying to do some shopping rather than "parent" your child.

The phrase LAUGHABLY FUCKING NAIVE LACK OF EXPERIENCE would spring to mind here if I was the bolshy type.

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:51 (nineteen years ago)

The long term solution was teaching him about road safety WHILE KEEPING HIM SAFE IN THE MEANTIME. He is old enough and smart enough now to know better.
You think restaining him by making him walk with his hand constanty above his head is better than letting him walk and feel relatively free whilst keeping a gentle hold of him?

i think that's called 'parenting'
Don't make a sanctimonious arse of yourself.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:52 (nineteen years ago)

Bark collars should be mandatory for children in public places. Whenever the little tyke starts throwing a fit or ruining someone else's dinner, give 'em a little shock.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:53 (nineteen years ago)

now you're talkin

Rob Bolton (Rob Bolton), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:54 (nineteen years ago)

Oh for fuck's sake, are we really at the "I'm a better parent than you" stage of discussion-board maturation?

Dan (Judging: It's What's For Dinner!) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:55 (nineteen years ago)

It would seem so :-(

Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:55 (nineteen years ago)

if you are unable to parent your child and shop simultaneously, there are bigger problems than the leash.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:55 (nineteen years ago)

Wow.

Dan (Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Click Here) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 December 2005 22:59 (nineteen years ago)

Emily, you have no children.

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:01 (nineteen years ago)

yes, i do.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:02 (nineteen years ago)

Did you use nappies? Didn't you feel that might artificially restrict their ability to shit? And I hope you don't use those horrid cruel seatbelt things on them in the car.

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:04 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, she does.

. however, mine is just taking her first steps so i may have to revise that opinion in a few months

Relatively open mind for a nanosecond there, just before she explained to me why I'm a bad man for looking after my son.

xpost

Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:04 (nineteen years ago)

Yow, wow.

I typed a whole answer as justifying circumstances, but I'm out.

Hunter (Hunter), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:04 (nineteen years ago)

i was joking about the open mindedness, of course!

i have one daughter (9 months) and i care for my neice and nephew (4 and 2) 45-50 hours a week. we often go grocery shopping and running errands throughout the day and i never have needed a leash. i don't think that is due to my super human abilities.

and i don't think that anyone is a 'bad man' for using a leash. to each his own. i do feel that it is lazy and it is not necessary. sorry if i have crushed your self esteem.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:09 (nineteen years ago)

My self esteem is fine. I have two amazingly well developed children despite my appalling and lazy parenting skills. I may have another one, and keep it in a cage.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:11 (nineteen years ago)

AWESOME

Dan (Suck On That, BF Skinner!) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:12 (nineteen years ago)

i don't think that anyone is a 'bad man' for using a leash. to each his own. i do feel that it is lazy and it is not necessary.

The conjunction of these two sentences made my head blow up.

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:12 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I don't think there's anything super-bizarre about this, mostly because -- so far as I can tell -- it usually gets done for kids who've already displayed some sort of tendency to run off or get lost, some sort of behavior that requires something a little insurance beyond just attention and training. Around 80% of the time I've seen a kid in one of these things, the kid is kinda zooming around in a blur of activity even despite the parent following along at full attention trying to keep everything calm and behaved. It's quite easy to say "well raise your kid so they're not like that," but, you know, c'mon.

I say that granting that in the other 20% of cases you will, yes, see either (a) the sad spectacle of a perfectly orderly kid nonetheless tethered, presumably out of paranoia, and sometimes at disturbingly advanced ages, or (b) worse, the parent who stands there having a long conversation or paying attention to something else entirely, while, at the end of the leash, the child runs around raising hell. (I guess people do this with very small dogs, as well.) Which is dumb, for the obvious reasons, and also dangerous, because relying on the leash as some kind of magical protection will, yeah, not keep the kid from eating thumbtacks, punching strangers in the nuts, or trying to hug vicious dogs.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:12 (nineteen years ago)

Actually not out yet...

There is a day care close to DU, in the mornings I see them taking the kids for a walk on the low traffic semi-urban sidewalks when the weather allows. These are 3 year olds it looks like They are either holding onto, or somehow affixed to a 10 yard long run of webbing, 2 abreast by maybe 8 kids long. I'm here to say. One kid on a leash: demeaning oppression. 16 kid toddler chaingang: TOTALLY TWEE-DORABLE! Will add, they always seem happy enough. Now MUSH!

Hunter (Hunter), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:13 (nineteen years ago)

because anyone who is lazy is bad?


you should attach a hamster water bottle to its cage and i am sure it will thrive.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:13 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.sntp.net/behaviorism/skinner_box.jpg

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:14 (nineteen years ago)

EMILY you admit that you get through your shopping peacefully not due to your superhuman abilities. Consider that possibly you are blessed and lucky to be dealing with very easygoing well-behaved children. And consider that other people, for various reasons having nothing to do with laziness or appalling parenting, might have children who are less orderly in public than yours! It happens. Your peaceful nine-month-old, for instance, may very well go through a stage at some point where she just happens to like running off.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:16 (nineteen years ago)

http://members.aol.com/kievhusky/pcage.jpg

OH NOES IM A BAD LAZY PERANT!!!

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:16 (nineteen years ago)

http://img189.exs.cx/img189/9122/f10000155yq.jpg

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:17 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.charlise.com/paintings/cage.jpg

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:18 (nineteen years ago)

(And that's not saying that your kid/newphews are saints and other people have brats -- just that all kids are different! And they require different approaches to parenting / discipline / learning / safety / EVERYTHING.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:18 (nineteen years ago)

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0451159411.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.gif

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:18 (nineteen years ago)

YOU SEE? JESUS DIDN'T TURN OUT BAD!

Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:18 (nineteen years ago)

bah xpost!

Onimo (GerryNemo), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:19 (nineteen years ago)

I prefer the chemical leash:

http://www.pharmacyseek.com/images/meds/ritalin.jpg

walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:20 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.astro-nut.com/john_dobson___child_with_jump_rope.jpg

YEEHAW!! ROUND UP DEM LITTLE DOGIES!!!!

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:20 (nineteen years ago)

Oh for fuck's sake, are we really at the "I'm a better parent than you" stage of discussion-board maturation?

didn't we have a "what will a middle-aged ILX argue about" thread?

kingfish hobo juckie (kingfish 2.0), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:21 (nineteen years ago)

i am not saying that the RARE circumstance does not exist that would warrant such a contraption. perhaps that is true for onimo. it just seems that many who enlist the device do so because they would rather tie the child to their person than be bothered to pay enough attention to keep hold of them. they seem to be overused. like television/kid's videos, i guess.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:24 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.infinityproducts.com/images/009.jpg

LOOK AT THIS MISERABLE DEGRADED CHIDL

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:24 (nineteen years ago)

are you talking about his haircut?

Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:26 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.dinf.ne.jp/doc/english/global/david/dwe002/dwe002g/dwe00211g79.gif

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:26 (nineteen years ago)

When you go shopping, do you run there or do you take the lazy way out and drive/take public transporation?

Dan (Curious) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:26 (nineteen years ago)

Because these things are equivalent.

Hunter (Hunter), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:28 (nineteen years ago)

Well, gotta go, the kids have been playing with matches for the last couple of hours cos I was too lazy to fetch them a lighter.

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:29 (nineteen years ago)

they seem to be overused.

Really? I only see a kid on a leash maybe once every couple of years. I think if they were very commonplace they wouldn't seem strange at all but the novelty of it makes it seem unnecessary.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:31 (nineteen years ago)

I'VE CREATED A MONSTER!

Lovelace (Lovelace), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:33 (nineteen years ago)

Well, gotta go, the kids have been playing with matches for the last couple of hours cos I was too lazy to fetch them a lighter.

Give a child matches and he is an arsonist for a day.

Give a child a lighter and he is an arsonist for a week.

But teach a child to start fires with nothing but two sticks and some string and he may be an arsonist for the rest of his life.

M. White (Miguelito), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:33 (nineteen years ago)

Because these things are equivalent.

Show me the studies that show that these child harnesses are damaging to children; until you do, the two examples are more equivalent than dissimilar.

Dan (Kids Need Exercise, Putting Them In A Car Is Just Lazy) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:34 (nineteen years ago)

I don't even want to think about what kind of Google Image Searches you people are performing.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:36 (nineteen years ago)

DAER POLICE I WAS ONLY GOOGLING "CHILD RESTRAINT" FOR THE LOLZ, HONEST

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:37 (nineteen years ago)

find me two studies that show dan perry is not bea arthur. until then, they are in fact the same person.

Emilymv (Emilymv), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:37 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.monstersandcritics.com/artman/uploads/scanners-a.jpg

Amity Wong (noodle vague), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:40 (nineteen years ago)

BUSTED

Bea (And I Would Have Gotten Away With It If IT Wasn't For Those Meddling Kids) , Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:40 (nineteen years ago)

FLY ALL IS KNOWN

xpost

jim p. irrelevant (electricsound), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:41 (nineteen years ago)

Wot is the big deal here? This idea that leashes is "degrading" is weird. I mean, they're degrading if you put them on an Iraqi prisoner, sure, but their primary function is not to degrade. Are people trying to humiliate their dogs? No, they're trying to keep some control over an animal with a tendency to wander, while still allowing them some freedom of movement. Same deal with a kid. Giving them a few feet of walking space seems a hell of a lot less oppressive than strapping them tight into a stroller. Our kid isn't quite to walking yet and we haven't thought about whether to ever use a kid-leash, but I wouldn't rule it out. And holding the end of a leash is no lazier than holding a hand, as long as you're keeping a close eye on things.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:53 (nineteen years ago)

Are people trying to humiliate their dogs?

I bet people who put leashes on their kids put humiliating sweaters on their dogs.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Thursday, 1 December 2005 23:58 (nineteen years ago)

Is it wrong to want to excelsior parts of this thread? Onimo and Amity and Nabisco and others OTM, emilymv TOTALLY FUCKING WRONGHEADED.

I don't have kids, but I was one myself once, and I think I can safely say I could have lived with having been attached to my parents for a while rather than being another roadkill statistic. (My parents were exceptionally good at parenting, as far as I'm concerned, taught me right from wrong, all that malarkey, and I have no idea whether I was reined or not - presumably not as I would still be bearing the mental scars of such brutal degradation)

Incidentally, what's wrong with children's TV?

ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 2 December 2005 00:46 (nineteen years ago)

I may have another one, and keep it in a cage.

This is what I expected to be in the hatch on Lost. Would've been far more interesting.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Friday, 2 December 2005 01:08 (nineteen years ago)

I could have lived with

As indeed, I did (what with the alternative being not living and everything). God, my vocabulary is pathetic at times. Perhaps my parents should have tethered me to a thesaurus.

ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 2 December 2005 01:11 (nineteen years ago)

My mum used reins on me and my THREE siblings. I don't really see how she could've kept an eye on us all otherwise - none of us were particularly hyperactive, or unruly, but we were all curious little tykes who weren't afraid to wander off and inspect whatever thingumy might have caught our eye. I didn't once feel even slightly degraded (ridiculous concept!), and it probably saved me from getting run over by a bus, or lost, either of which would've been pretty unpleasant for me, as a child.

JimD (JimD), Friday, 2 December 2005 01:21 (nineteen years ago)

mrs hunter is about 8 months huge, and our 21 month old weighs 35 lbs and over 3ft, he is utterly ginormous. Carrying him is very tough. he can walk, but is prone to darting. A leash would be helpful.

I see no problem w/ it generally-- wisely used and where age appropriate.

Hunter (Hunter), Friday, 2 December 2005 01:43 (nineteen years ago)

We live on an island and I used to use a leash with my older son when we rode the ferry. The boat ride was a special occasion, and he'd go totally apeshit with excitement—without the leash he might have vaulted right over the railing. I don't think I was lazy, though I was definitely exhausted at times. Let's have some compassion. Considering that kids DO get hit by cars, etc, I'd rather err on the side of caution. Also, for city parents, I imagine they could slip their arm through the leash handle and then have both hands free for grocery bags. And some independent kids don't WANT to hold your hand.
My kids are grown up now, and don't seem to carry a grudge.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Friday, 2 December 2005 04:16 (nineteen years ago)

Leashes are a great idea in moderation. If I'm in a Wal-Mart Supercenter I'd risk the slight degradation for the assurance that my beautiful children wouldn't be picked up by a perv or wander to the toy section when I turn my back for a moment to pick up something that another child has accidentally knocked off a shelf. Kids are very unpredictable. I think that after a certain age it's probably bad, but when they're young and you're just trying to get some contact lens solution - - come on!! Have some kids and navigate a busy shopping center and then come on here and tell other parents that they're lazy. It's responsible parenting in most cases.

Rebekkah (burntbrat), Friday, 2 December 2005 04:28 (nineteen years ago)

What Would Jane Teasdale Say

Hunter (Hunter), Friday, 2 December 2005 04:41 (nineteen years ago)

WTF? I used to *love* my reins because my hands were free and I could do this (probably very irritating for my mum) thing where you take youf feet off the ground and just swing there. Reins aren't lazy parenting. Are you saying a new parent should carry their baby in their arms rather than using a papoose?

Other news: my Mum used to tie me to the mattress at night. No, really. I used to keep standing up in my cot and crying because I couldn't get back down again so Mum made a special sleeping bag for me which attached to the mattress and made me feel secure. Even now, I adore getting into a bed with sheets tucked in really tightly because it gives me the same feeling of security.

Mädchen (Madchen), Friday, 2 December 2005 09:59 (nineteen years ago)

Mothercare Child Cruelty Scandal

Mädchen (Madchen), Friday, 2 December 2005 10:07 (nineteen years ago)

WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN?

Concerned Of Tabloid Land (GerryNemo), Friday, 2 December 2005 10:12 (nineteen years ago)

NO THANKS, I DON'T LIKE THEM

Sailor Kitten (g-kit), Friday, 2 December 2005 10:24 (nineteen years ago)

Using reigns on a kid isn't degrading or treating them like a dog. Making them sleep in a kennel and drink water out of a bowl on the floor is though.

James Ward (jamesmichaelward), Friday, 2 December 2005 10:26 (nineteen years ago)

I too am a victim of the cruel, degrading reins of laziness!! To think I suppressed this memory all these years. I'm off now to sue my mother.

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Friday, 2 December 2005 10:28 (nineteen years ago)

One time, on holiday, we got one to stop Amber (18 months at the time) from running off. This was a leash attached to her wrist.

Anyway, she took two steps, then raised her arm as if to say "Remove this!" and stood rock still. There was no moving her. So we removed it and never used it again.

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 2 December 2005 10:52 (nineteen years ago)

I do remember reading a scare-story a good while back about a child stepping into a lift before it's mother while wearing one of these. One party was injusred and there was small outcry at the time and calls for banning etc.

Not sure if this was an isolated case due to the straps being too long or whether it was a real concern at the time...

Rumpie (lil drummer girl parumpumpumpu), Friday, 2 December 2005 11:00 (nineteen years ago)

My parents used reins on me, I don't feel unduly damaged. In fact I used tpo relish being able to run about a bit, rather than having to hold on to a parent's hand. I can see why parents used them too. I used to run off frequently. Shops to me were large areas of wonder to explore. I'm not totally sure why I have such clear recall of being a toddler when I struggle to remember last weekend.

Anna (Anna), Friday, 2 December 2005 13:55 (nineteen years ago)

far cooler idea:

http://www.woofbrothers.com/files/images/thumbs/t_28.jpg

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Friday, 2 December 2005 14:05 (nineteen years ago)

one of my friends was really hyperactive as a child, so his parents had a harness for him for a while until comments from random people out in public made them retire it. they had already parented one young child by that time, so it wasn't an issue of ignorance or laziness. as for effects down the road, the kid is now a happily married successful musician contemplating a child of his own so his time with the leash doesn't seem to have scarred him any.

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 2 December 2005 14:12 (nineteen years ago)

I bought one of those child leash thingies for my first daughter when she was a toddler, precisely for the reasons of safety when we were in town, but it wasn't terribly successful. I had thought it was a good idea - toddlers often don't want to hold your hand all the time because they like to feel they have a certain amount of independence, so I got one of those curly plastic cables which you attach to the wrists of both parent and toddler via velcro straps.

Cunning small daughter quickly realised that she could remove her end of the velcro wrist strap and attach it to an immovable object (iron railings, car door handle etc) when my attention was distracted for the merest nanosecond, thus leaving me tethered and her free to run away.

C J (C J), Friday, 2 December 2005 14:15 (nineteen years ago)

I can't believe this thread's still going.

Miss Misery xox (MissMiseryTX), Friday, 2 December 2005 14:23 (nineteen years ago)

oh ffs. it is a way to make your kid safe without restricting their (and your) movement so much. there's no problem here. i remember having reins and just having the *best* time trying to run against the rope in different directions and pissing myself laughing. i grew up in the countryside so the traffic wasn't mental but i'm still glad i had it.

i think they are apalling and a tool for lazy parenting.

onimo's reply totally totally otm. actually, onimo otm on whole thread.


i am not saying that the RARE circumstance does not exist that would warrant such a contraption. perhaps that is true for onimo. it just seems that many who enlist the device do so because they would rather tie the child to their person than be bothered to pay enough attention to keep hold of them. they seem to be overused. like television/kid's videos, i guess.

i really don't think it's necessarily to do w how much attention you pay your kid. i know i was paid an absolutely mental amount of attention when i were a babby, but to keep me safe while making sure i didn't, you know, DIE, i was kept on a lead when out in public, for ages. and we lived in a tiny village. um, obv they can be misused. but i would guess anyone having a prob wrt the misuse of leads for kids would have a few other bigger probs to sort out first.

Wot is the big deal here? This idea that leashes is "degrading" is weird. I mean, they're degrading if you put them on an Iraqi prisoner, sure, but their primary function is not to degrade. Are people trying to humiliate their dogs? No, they're trying to keep some control over an animal with a tendency to wander, while still allowing them some freedom of movement. Same deal with a kid. Giving them a few feet of walking space seems a hell of a lot less oppressive than strapping them tight into a stroller. Our kid isn't quite to walking yet and we haven't thought about whether to ever use a kid-leash, but I wouldn't rule it out. And holding the end of a leash is no lazier than holding a hand, as long as you're keeping a close eye on things.

YES YES YES.

emsk ( emsk), Sunday, 4 December 2005 03:41 (nineteen years ago)

and as an aside to those of you w v small kids thinking of putting them on reins and worrying about it, it has so much to do with how you present it. make them believe they're in star trek etc and it'll be fine...

emsk ( emsk), Sunday, 4 December 2005 03:51 (nineteen years ago)

oh yeah, and to answer the actual question i was born summer 78 and walking er surprisingly early, so winter/spring 78/79?

emsk ( emsk), Sunday, 4 December 2005 03:56 (nineteen years ago)

SIT EMSK! SIT! Staaaaaaay. Good boy. *tosses biscuit*

Hunter (Hunter), Sunday, 4 December 2005 04:29 (nineteen years ago)

Beating in public is however totally wrong. I was very much against it until I had to babysit my cousin for a weekend. After that experience, I realize sometimes the kid just pushes you over the edge.

See, apart from Emily beating down on people she doesn't know, with kids she doesn't know, about their parenting abilities based on her smug self-imposed moral superiority, THIS is the worst thing on this thread.

Sorry if I'm missing something, Nathalie, but are you saying that if a kid pushes you to breaking point then it's justifiable to lash out at them? I'm not anti-smacking at all (OH NOES, BAD POTENTIAL PARENT ALERT!! What with agreement with the use of reins and everything, perhaps I should be sterilised now for the good of humankind), but physical punishment (not violence) should be delivered in a measured and controlled way, with reasons for your actions being given to the kid so that they realise WHY they are being punished. This is what my dad did to me, he hated doing it, but it did me good in the long run and I bear no mental scarring from it. Not by lashing out when the little brats get too much for you to deal with rationally.

I may have misinterpreted this (I know English isn't your first language, so it may have looked worse than you intended), but I thought it needed saying.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 4 December 2005 11:05 (nineteen years ago)

No, what I wanted to say is that I could understand my uncle slapping him. It was still wrong in my opinion, but I could understand that it pushed him over the edge. The kid seems to test people to the point you no longer know what to do. I'm still very much against slapping because it's the wrong of showing a kid s/he's been wrong. It doesn't tell the kid why s/he shouldn't have done what s/he did. (And yes I know that you said a slap should be accompanied with an explanation of why you are doing it.) Maybe my anti-smacking stance comes from the fact my dad was beaten by his dad and I saw what it did to my dad. He still suffers from it. On top of that I witnessed child abuse: my neighbours' kids were beaten and I knew it happened. I even saw the abuse at times. I witness how much sadness it caused. I also saw that it didn't help the kids at all. You say it did you good, but some kids don't understand it. I remember a family friend slapping her kid and the kid didn't care. He just shrugged and walked away.

Hey, it's all a matter of opinion. Am I wrong or right? Fuck knows. See, I could see one child benefiting from a slap; but personally I don't wanna risk it. :-)

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Sunday, 4 December 2005 11:34 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, the reason I benefitted from smacking was because I was made to understand *why* it happened - that I *was* being punished for doing something naughty, and not just being subjected to random acts of violence from a deeply frustrated parent. Thanks for explaining, Nath.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 4 December 2005 11:52 (nineteen years ago)

You cut the cord when the baby comes out of the vagina, people. Not six years later.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Sunday, 4 December 2005 18:01 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, exactly, you nurtured them for 9 months, fuck looking after them from that point on. Wee non-self-sufficient fuXors.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 4 December 2005 19:22 (nineteen years ago)

Ask yourself this: Would it be appropriate to use leashes on elderly people? I mean, you can make the connection between crib and craftmatic, stroller and wheelchair. Maybe an orderly can throw a lasso around Grandma and let her run "free"!

Tethers, leashes, and leads are to be used only for animals and balloons.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 5 December 2005 03:32 (nineteen years ago)

I asked my mum if I had reins when I was young and she said "Of course you did - you were prone to disappearing quick as a flash if I looked away for a split second."

We walked through the shopping mall down her way (very crowded, parents and kids everywhere) and I counted at least six kids wearing reins. How uncomforatable and awkward must it be for a parent to walk stooped holding a childs hand? That or a pushchair would be the only alternative to reins because it would be IMPOSSIBLE to stop your child getting lost in such an environment otherwise.

Rumpie (lil drummer girl parumpumpumpu), Monday, 5 December 2005 09:43 (nineteen years ago)

Ask yourself this: Would it be appropriate to use leashes on elderly people? I mean, you can make the connection between crib and craftmatic, stroller and wheelchair. Maybe an orderly can throw a lasso around Grandma and let her run "free"!

Old people don't tend to run so fast do they?

James Ward (jamesmichaelward), Monday, 5 December 2005 09:54 (nineteen years ago)

Tell that to the old man in my neighborhood who my mom once found standing around our birdbath, announcing that he was "goin' home!".

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 5 December 2005 09:58 (nineteen years ago)

How uncomforatable and awkward must it be for a parent to walk stooped holding a childs hand

Very. I'm about six foot tall, our little boy is about two foot. So I would need like four foot long arms to make it remotely comfortable. That said, you'd have to be some sort of glutton for punishment to take your toddler round the shopping mall anyhow. Take them to the woods instead and let them run around like nutters, says I.

NickB (NickB), Monday, 5 December 2005 10:07 (nineteen years ago)

When did parents start using leashes on their kids?

In the 16th century. (images seem to be unavailable or protected, but the article is accessible)

StanM (StanM), Monday, 5 December 2005 10:28 (nineteen years ago)

i'm not completely enthralled about keeping children on leashes, but i'm not completely enthralled about keeping dogs on leashes either. now, i've taken care of dogs and i've taken care of toddlers, and i know dogs can run a hell of a lot faster than toddlers, so obviously you've gotta put your ethical objections aside if you don't want your dog to run away, get hit by a car, have fights with other dogs, impregnate some little neighborhood bitches. kids are MUCH easier to keep an eye on, but if something happens ot them, they're not as self-sufficient as animals.

i used to babysit a lot and it was the first time in my life i was ever really selfless -- they weren't even my kids but as long as they were nearby, they were in the front of my brain ALL THE TIME, always in my line of vision. i can see myself being a good parent, better than most parents probably, but boy oh boy, what kind of life would i have if i were in that hyper-vigilant role 24/7/365?

so i dunno. i'm on the fence.

mies van der rohffle (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 5 December 2005 10:38 (nineteen years ago)

Out of interest, are we using the word 'leash' because it's in the thread title, or because that's how reins are known in other countries?

Mädchen (Madchen), Monday, 5 December 2005 12:16 (nineteen years ago)

Weans on reins

Rumpie (lil drummer girl parumpumpumpu), Monday, 5 December 2005 12:30 (nineteen years ago)

around the same time as when people started feeling as though they even need to ask questions such as this

Is it bad for a baby to see you masturbating?

ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 13:04 (nineteen years ago)

I'm actually really interested in the question because 'leash' has all kinds of connotations and perhaps the people who don't speak English as their first language are using it without realising it isn't the best translation and has possibly been used by some people on the thread to emphasise their points of view.

I say this as a speaker of two other languages who has frequently picked up all kinds of bad/rude expressions without fully understanding what they mean. That's what happens when you spend the majority of your year abroad in the pub :)

Mädchen (Madchen), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:10 (nineteen years ago)

in the U.S. we associate leashes with dogs. it's why "baby leash" might sound a little "um, er..." while another name for it would likely placate sensitive persons a little more.

mies van der rohffle (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:19 (nineteen years ago)

I actually don't know the dutch name for it.
Stan, do you know what we call it?

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:23 (nineteen years ago)

Yep, we use the same word for pets and kids: leiband. (the "children's tether" meaning is the oldest, even!)

StanM (StanM), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:27 (nineteen years ago)

That's what happens when you spend the majority of your year abroad in the pub :)

hehe it's funny you say that, because whilst i was in hong kong i noticed that (and this is true in america too actually coming to think of it) there were so many drinking establishments that called themselves 'pubs', when they were clearly bars!!

ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:29 (nineteen years ago)

Since the function is the same, I'd guess "leash" and "harness" will be the most commonly used words in other languages as well (in Dutch: leiband, gareel, harnas - all the same words that are used for pets and horses)...

StanM (StanM), Monday, 5 December 2005 14:31 (nineteen years ago)

Old people ARE put in restraints. The Geri-Chair has a tray that locks into position, preventing escape. Long-term care facilities are not supposed to use them a lot, but many of these places are understaffed, and people with Alzheimer's are often agitated. There is NO EASY SOLUTION.
As for active tots, those of you who are upset by the dog-restraint connotations of the word "leash" should just substitute another word. Or not. Remember— most dogs are TOTALLY OVERJOYED when their owner gets out the leash.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:32 (nineteen years ago)

Beth is right about dogs and leashes. I saw a dog yesterday carrying the handle of his leash in his mouth as he walked down the road and his little tail was wagging like crazy.

James Ward (jamesmichaelward), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:36 (nineteen years ago)

Dogs are the best. I loved my babies beyond all reason, and love them as adults, and other people's babys are cute and all, but PUPPIES?????? I get so swamped by puppylust I have to avert my eyes!!!! Why is that? Why am I more turned by babies of another species? I think it's probably a good thing—proof of a global familial web. This has nothing to do with leashes, but the leash thing is played out, don't you think?

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Monday, 5 December 2005 15:54 (nineteen years ago)

For a split second I thought you were my gran. Then I realized you also love your children, something she did/does not.

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Monday, 5 December 2005 16:02 (nineteen years ago)

Lately on ILE people have been mistaking me for their mothers, but this is the first time I've been mistaken for a grandmother. I guess my self image—that of a toddler in need of a leash—is somewhat out-of-whack.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Monday, 5 December 2005 16:54 (nineteen years ago)

not only that but a soon-to-be great grandmother!

ken c (ken c), Monday, 5 December 2005 16:55 (nineteen years ago)

six months pass...
http://i5.tinypic.com/15yjebr.jpg

Onimo (GerryNemo), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 20:19 (eighteen years ago)

!!!!!!!!!!

*applauds*

ailsa (ailsa), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 21:55 (eighteen years ago)

I thought just the 4-year-old cut down all your Animal Crossing trees. What did the other one do? :)

Jaq (Jaq), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 22:01 (eighteen years ago)

I can't believe I never saw this thread. Imagine it's 1949. A little girl looks across the street and sees a boy her age tied up on a child leash in the yard while his parents and their hosts play bridge - a memory that would freak out the girl as she grew up (the leash was pink and made of icky plastic). Twelve years later the little girl, my mom, meets a guy from the school next door at a dance, who is a day younger than her, who later becomes my dad. Imagine my mother's shock when upon meeting her in-laws they mention they used to play bridge with my mom's old neighbours.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 22:16 (eighteen years ago)

I thought just the 4-year-old cut down all your Animal Crossing trees. What did the other one do? :)

Oh I'm sure he did something worthy of caging. David's just happy to be off the leash.

Onimo (GerryNemo), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 22:32 (eighteen years ago)

Hahahah Onimo thats great :D

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 00:01 (eighteen years ago)

I used to think leashes were absurd, but when I read shit like this it makes me think otherwise.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 00:27 (eighteen years ago)

My mum used to harness me. I loved it - I used to pretend I was a horsey or something. She only had one harness though and sometimes she'd want to put it on my brother instead (he was younger) and so I'd sook. Anyway, we lost him coz he stepped into the lift ahead of us and there was a lot of comical going ups & downs and getting out at wrong floors until a kind lady held onto him until we found him. After that he had to stay in the pram.

miele kitty (miele), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 02:52 (eighteen years ago)

Leashes let kids have leashed kids of their own someday, thus completing what important psychologists refer to as “the circle of Leashes,� or “Leashes through the generations.�

Had my mother not leashed me on our vacations, I'd likely still be stuck in the gears of Mr. Toad's Wild Ride, presumed long-since abducted by some pervert with balloons, or perhaps be scrambling around the scaffolding of space mountain, hidden by darkness, a sickly forsaken Gollum-like creature. I wasn't a bad kid, but I was utterly oblivious. I wouldn't ditch my parents purposefully, I'd just wander off, usually looking in any direction but the one in which I was headed (so I've been told). In my job now I see lots of families, and a similar lack of awareness from the kids. They're not being bold or intentionally difficult -- usually they'll relax for a while when asked -- but they don't yet have the self-discipline to maintain this themselves for very long. They just start running around again. They also don't understand what the risks they're taking are. In that sense keeping them close = keeping them safe, in exactly the same way that setting a curfew, and keeping them inside (surely a more drastic, though more accepted, limitation) is a sensible idea. Someday I hope to tie a child to a piece of leather.

A Giant Mechanical Ant (The Giant Mechanical Ant), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 04:25 (eighteen years ago)

Assuming a very short type leash/loop attached to kid very close to parent, how is that really any different from holding the child's hand, except in that it is easier on the spines of taller adults?

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 04:34 (eighteen years ago)

Well, I guess discomfort is probably part of it. My leash (wow) was probably six or eight feet long, judging by pictures. So I was afforded at least the illusion of independence, I suppose. Likewise, my mother and father could walk along without getting sore shoulders or be constantly interrupted by their little ‘consequence.’ I think it was a fairly happy arrangement overall. I was very young, I was happy (so they tell me).

It probably is marginally less safe than holding hands, but if the adult is spending half the time shaking the feeling back into their arm then holding hands isn't really comparable.

A Giant Mechanical Ant (The Giant Mechanical Ant), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 05:09 (eighteen years ago)

I use a leash/harness/reins on my one-year-old. He has just learnt to walk, wants to walk all the time, and yet regularly falls flat on his face. Since we have wooden floors, that's positively dangerous. With a leash I can pull him back on his feet before he falls. Actually, he's starting to walk a bit better now, and he's also started to put his hands forward so he doesn't fall directly onto his face, so maybe I'll be unleashing him soon. They may look weird, but they're incredibly practical for babies learning to walk.

Revivalist (Revivalist), Wednesday, 28 June 2006 12:06 (eighteen years ago)

seven months pass...
Revive! I saw a kid on an actual leash a couple of weeks ago. Like actually tethered round its wrist - not like a reins-type affair like this:

http://au.geocities.com/safety4baby/images/ToddlerReins.jpg

but just like a dog-leash.

This was at the football on a busy staircase where 34 year old me and 35 year old Onimo once got separated by the crowd, so, yeah, still necessary for hanging onto toddlers you don't want disappearing.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 28 January 2007 12:40 (eighteen years ago)

Does Onimo keep you on a leash when you go to the football now?

StanM (StanM), Sunday, 28 January 2007 13:04 (eighteen years ago)

Nah, because I'm big enough to look after myself (most of the time). But this thread still makes me chuckle to myself whenever I see kids on leashes, like they should be forced to be separated from their parent in a busy situtation just because it might give them a complex.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 28 January 2007 13:11 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, I think it's pretty ridiculous too, but then someone posts something like this and you can hardly argue with that...

I used to think leashes were absurd, but when I read shit like this it makes me think otherwise.

-- Andrew (n...), June 28th, 2006 3:27 AM. (enneff) (link)

(Except, what are the chances? Do they really justify being paranoid 24/7?)

StanM (StanM), Sunday, 28 January 2007 13:18 (eighteen years ago)

No-one keeps their kids on a leash / on reins 24/7, stop being ridiculous. But, in crowds, or when kids are liable to put themselves in danger, and holding their hand isn't an option, there is nothing wrong with them.

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 28 January 2007 13:40 (eighteen years ago)

Incidentally, is emilymv still around? Your kid walking yet? You coping alright?

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 28 January 2007 13:41 (eighteen years ago)

I think it has something to do with the rise of industrialization and wars in general.
Fear. Which is why those of us who are a bit older love reminiscing about our parents shoving us out into the bitter cold to ride bicycles without helmets. And skate on dicey ponds. And gather bloodsuckers and crickets as friends.
And then call us back to home to eat...meatloaf!

aimurchie (aimurchie), Sunday, 28 January 2007 14:46 (eighteen years ago)

I can't believe this thread is back! Are we all going to reiterate what we said several yards upthread? I'll restrain myself. With a leash, if necessary.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Sunday, 28 January 2007 16:46 (eighteen years ago)

Um, yeah, I've re-read the thread now, I won't be reiterating anymore.

"stop being ridiculous" eh? ok then ;-)

StanM (StanM), Sunday, 28 January 2007 17:12 (eighteen years ago)

I say keep 'em tied up at all times.

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/178/372087383_2b726fa5b2.jpg

onimo (onimo), Sunday, 28 January 2007 17:37 (eighteen years ago)

Wow! That's one cute baby.

jennyjennyjenny (pullapartgirl), Sunday, 28 January 2007 19:24 (eighteen years ago)

Aw, is that Megan? She got big!

(I just came across this on random, and wanted to mention about the kid I saw on a leash in a necessary situation. Anyone wanting to reiterate themselves, feel free. I stand by everything I said upthread)

ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 28 January 2007 20:02 (eighteen years ago)

OMG my parents had that exact same rainbow strap kiddy leash for me when I was little. I can't remember them ever using it but I guess they must have. But kids can be so bad, leash all them shits and let god sort 'em out.

A B C (sparklecock), Sunday, 28 January 2007 20:12 (eighteen years ago)

My parents used reins on me when I was small - until I was about 4, I guess. "Reins" and "leash" do make me think of different things, though - reins are what you attach to a harness, a leash is a single strap that attaches to a collar.

The humiliation aspect: I remember my mum looking after a friend's kid, aged about 5 or 6, and threatening him that if he didn't behave when walking home from the village, she would put him on the reins (which she'd kept from when I was small). She only had to take them with her and show him, for him to immediately start behaving himself.

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Sunday, 28 January 2007 20:23 (eighteen years ago)


That is one cute leashed baby, Onimo!

aimurchie (aimurchie), Sunday, 28 January 2007 20:31 (eighteen years ago)

i got real drunk and blacked out at disneyland 2 nights ago. i ditched my friends and no one could find me then i apparently went into space mountain line and started cussing people out and tryed to start fights and got kicked out. leashes can be handy.

chaki (chaki), Sunday, 28 January 2007 21:34 (eighteen years ago)

I still feel all wound up seeing people using the word 'leash' because for me its connotations are:
1) dogs
2) S&M
Both are a touch inappropriate when you're talking about children!

Mädchen (Madchen), Monday, 29 January 2007 17:07 (eighteen years ago)

I like reins better because they remind me of reindeer and santa.

Mädchen (Madchen), Monday, 29 January 2007 17:08 (eighteen years ago)

No-one keeps their kids on a leash / on reins 24/7, stop being ridiculous.

Sheesh, Ailsa, you always take people seriously,don't you? He said:"(Except, what are the chances? Do they really justify being paranoid 24/7?)" He wasn't talking about leashing the kid all the time. Or maybe I didn't understand correctly...

Anyway, use whatever you want if it means keeping your kid safe. A leash will hardly hurt a kid (emotionally nor physically). People should give it a fucking rest, what with pushing their opinoins on others thinking that's the way it should be. Parenting is a hard job, an accident can quickly happen. If a leash can prevent that, why not use it?

Nathalie (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 14:07 (eighteen years ago)

If not leash or reins how about a monkey harness?

We have one of these! Flickr friends will know how adorable Ava looks in it.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 15:41 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.