White Men Who Exclusively Date Asian Women

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Spinoff from the Balthus thread:

Should W.M.W.E.D.A.W. be
a)shunned for lusting after a submissive/exotic stereotype;
b)praised for seeing beyond the bounds of cultural determinism;
c) or given no more thought than those who say "I'm a Leg Man" or whatever?

Patti Hearst, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

or what?

Patti Hearst, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

d) star in hilarious sitcom with me

ethan, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

We had a guy like this at my college. We called him "The Sexecutioner". He was tall with sharp cheekbones and could often be seen wearing a long white scarf and clutching roses in his hand, hurriedly walking towards another date with another asian girl. In the Sexecutioner's case it was e) the object of slightly pitying derision.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Exclusively dating any ethnicity seems pretty stupid. I always figure my dating chances are pretty slim as is! That said, Asian girls can be pretty cute. My parents on the other hand, are still holding out hope for a nice jewish girl.

bnw, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

We had a guy like this at my college. We called him "The Sexecutioner". He was tall with sharp cheekbones and could often be seen wearing a long white scarf and clutching roses in his hand, hurriedly walking towards another date with another asian girl

Are you sure that wasn't Tuxedo Mask?

Ally, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay I've googled. That was frightening. Yes Ally he was TOTALLY Tuxedo Mask, but to my knowledge he possessed no superpowers. Except maybe over unsuspecting asian women.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I only dated white guys my whole life, until I met Jeff, who's Chinese. Since then I've dated a couple other Asian guys briefly. It's like I'm suddenly realizing how many cute ones there are. It's not like I didn't like Asian guys before, just that I really didn't think about it. It's almost embarassing to admit it for some reason. I know there's guys who are only attracted to one ethnicity, which I guess is a little limiting; who am I to say. I'm not one of those people at all. But I do find myself checking out way more Asian guys then I ever did before. I shouldn't feel funny about this, right?

Sean, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

IF YOU ONLY DATE ASIAN, YOU SHOULD TRY DATING THE PERSONALITY FOR ONCE, NOT THE EYES

Mike Hanle y, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It IS frightening, isn't it? Now you know why I'm so terrified of Anime - it's full of men like Tuxedo Mask.

Ally, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

BUT I AM MYSELF A SIAN! SEE FOR YOURSLEF:

http://dau.physics.sunysb.edu/~ming/sos/pix/sostux2a.jpg

TUXEDO MOON, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Right now would be a good time to say I'm not 'Patti Hearst'...

In Bust last year there was a fantastic article about these guys written by a Chinese-American woman. She was pretty vitriolic about these guys but saved her ire proper for the girls from Korea, Japan etc. who dated these men, since she thought they weren't exactly conductive to her mission to be seen by men as having her own personality and equal intelligence as opposed to the wilting lotus blossom of chauvinist wank fantasy. And she was very, very angry about all these cases of yellow fever in her vicinity.

I don't blame her for being angry, but at some stage what men think about/what they look at is going to stop concerning or annoying feminists (and even other women). What was really interesting to me was the girl v. girl vibes in the article, as if the compliant woman had some culpability in the man's ultimate disrespect for the type he chose to fetishise.

suzy, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

My friend thinks all WMWEDAW are choice a). He thinks they are a bunch of bastards who will eventually eliminate the purpose of existing as an Asian male. Sometimes it IS the horrible exotic thing, but often in these relationships, the girl is 2nd/3rd/4th generation (thoroughly Americanized) and so the submissive/exotic aspect hardly applies at all. In many instances it's just a couple of hip kids with race being close to incidental.

Honda, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I am peeing myself practically over that Tuxedo Mask picture.

Ally, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

ALLY HAS FORMS OF TORTURE THAT ARE NEW. I SAY DATE THE ASIAN WOMAN IF SHE IS YOUR "SPECIAL TIME" LOVE WAY. OTHER IS NO MANUFACTURE A FLOD!

Mike Hanle y, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

the reason i never dated asian men was a fear i was being a tourist .

anthony, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The friend I mentioned in my last post plans on naming his kid Darian, after Tuxedo Mask. If it's a boy that is.

Honda, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

All I know is that if one of my friends gets a new boy/girlfriend, when the friend speaks of the new love interest I want to hear things like 'they're really intelligent', 'they're really fun' or 'you'll probably like them'. These things are so easy to say when they are true. If my friend doesn't say these or other simple, complimentary things about their new squeeze I wonder what's keeping them interested.

suzy, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay, let's try a little noun substitution on Suzy's Bust article above and see how the arguments play. Let's look at another symbiotic desire relationship. Let's substitute [rock stars] for Asian girls, and [groupies] for the guys who date them, and see what happens. (I picture it being Steven Malkmus getting 'very very angry' here. But substitute your own rrrriot boy.)

In [Spin] last year there was a fantastic article about [groupies] written by a [rock star]. He was pretty vitriolic about these girls but saved his ire proper for the [other rock stars] from Limp Bizkit, Asia etc who dated these [groupies], since he thought they weren't exactly conducive to his mission to be seen by [women] as having his own personality and equal intelligence as opposed to some wilting [air guitar] in a [slags'] wet dream. And he was very, very angry about all these cases of [rock star idolatry] in his vicinity.

I don't blame him for being angry, but at some stage what [women] think about / what they look at is going to stop concerning or annoying [rockists] (and even other men). What was really interesting to me was the boy v. boy vibes in the article, as if the [strutting rock star] had some culpability in the woman's ultimate disrespect for the type she chose to fetishise.

Momus, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yup, that works.

Mark C, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

That doesn't quite scan, Nick. It just looks...wack...once you have to find replacement words that aren't 'rock star' and 'groupie'. Chauvinist/slag??? Kettle, your pot's boiling.

The overall impression I got was that the writer of that Bust article was angry, but she really couldn't decide who she should really be angry with. The 'fantastic' (which is not to say 'good') nature of the piece was that I wasn't aware that there was any animosity felt by Asian-American women towards the Japanese etc. women for the reasons she mentioned. It was just weird. But I laughed myself hoarse when she said the main fetishists were guys of Scots descent!

suzy, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think what the substitution exercise demonstrates is that there's something faintly spoiled about people who are desired complaining about this, or trying to dictate to those they wish to stimulate the exact reasons they should be desired. Just as it's silly for a rock star to strut about on a stage then want groupies to throw their knickers at him for his 'mind' or his 'personality', not his crotch bulge. And I've never bought the 'this degrades women' argument. It's too Platonic, and implies a too-rigid identification of all women with a single pose. Am I 'very very angry' at Ian Brown and Cornelius for making simian mannerisms synonymous with male sexual attractiveness in the 90s? Not at all. If I think they're right, I ape them. If I think they're wrong, I go about attracting my own type of females in my own type of way.

The fact we can now prefer a racial type the way our parents preferred a certain hair colour has more to do with the exponential increase in jet travel than anything else. We do it because we *can*, and because the diversity of the modern city gives us freedom of sexual choice, allowing us to discover elective affinities previous generations never got a chance to discover.

Momus, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

WHAT ABOUT THE RELATION SHIP BETWEEN GA Y REPUBLICANS AND AGEING NEWS COMENTATORS? THERE TOO LIES A QUANDRY!

Mike Hanle y, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think your irreverent meter has turned a bit high today, Mr. Hanley.

ALly, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I very much like the last paragraph in Momus's above post.

Sean, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i think there is a traditon of sexual tourism and an exoticazation of asian woman that makes it difficult for a realtionship to be innocent . maybe thats racist of me ?

anthony, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Just as it's silly for a rock star to strut about on a stage then want groupies to throw their knickers at him for his 'mind' or his 'personality', not his crotch bulge.

Yikes: there are all sorts of things wrong with your logic here. For one thing, you seem to think it is automatic that women will stare at a 'rock star's' crotch bulge instead of his personality. And how exactly do Asian women "strut" their phenotype?

Big Fat White Butt, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I know just how y'all feel. See, I love white men. Especially white men with red or blonde hair. All of this miscegenatin' goin' on has me worried that white boys won't stay as white as they are.

Ilsa, She-Wolf of the SS, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

So you think the Chinese-American writer of the Bust article was 'spoiled' for preferring one kind of guy (someone who is attracted to her personality first) over another (someone who is attracted to her ethnicity first)? That's just daft. It's called 'selection' for a reason, and it's not just men who get to do it. Anyway I know tons of Japanese women who automatically de-select guys with a case of yellow fever. Why? They could've stayed at home, played 'submissive' roles to get by, or get treated like an accessory so see no need to travel to a major world city to experience a slight remix of the same record. Why, armed with a degree, intelligence, opportunities their parents didn't have and various other attributes, should they have to suffer any of that?

suzy, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

People are attracted to other people for many different reasons, but just want to raise my small voice and say that if I'm attracted to an Asian guy, it's not for any submissive stereotype, or, indeed any at all. To be fair to the point taken by the author of the article Suzy cites, it's Asian women who fall prey to this, not men, so what I'm saying isn't 100% applicable...

Sean, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

what i wanna know is why do guys with the asia fetish also have this weird hangup about black women - like they are scared of black people and black women. it just seems to me that all of the stereotypes fit into a general consellation of white supremacy where each racial type is assigned certain sexual charecteristics and you fetishise accordingly. becaus in this racist setup the black women are opposite of the asia women. you don't hear about asian men having a 'fetish' do you?

question mark, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sean, all the gay guys I've ever known talk about Rice Queens etc. in a way interchangeable with guys who talk about their attraction for 'bears'. Do you find this too?

suzy, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

But Question Mark, you're forgetting how the same sort of sterotype- attraction is directed at black males, who are, in the mind of many a 19-year-old state-school sorority sister, these dangerous dominant musclebound sweaty parentally-forbidden excessively-endowed exoticized sex-gorillas.

Which is largely why I take the side of Suzy's article-praising: this is in many cases solely a result of deeply demeaning stereotyping, albeit made non-threatening by the fact that the stereotyper thinks they're positive ones. Whether those who accept (or exploit) the stereotypes are any more to blame than those who apply them -- well, that's another matter.

NB: this is not to argue that certain individuals may have aesthetic or cultural preferences for certain types of people, but I strongly doubt that this is the case in even 25% of racialist fetishizing.

|\|~+5uh, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry: that should read something like "this is not to argue that certain individuals may not etc.," and you know what I mean.

Nitsuh, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Suzy; yes. As far as I'm aware, they're both just "types" to be into. I don't think gay guys speak about liking Asian guys in hushed tones or anything. Sure there's a racial element, but no one's getting hurt or exploited. Obviously, there's a whole lot of Asian guys into white men as well. Do you think there should be a difference between liking say, big hairy guys, and Asians, blacks, or whatever?

Sean, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Aesthetic type-preference = reasonable.

Behavioral expectations wrapped up with gender complexities = awful.

|\|!+5uh, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Anyway I know tons of Japanese women who automatically de-select guys with a case of yellow fever. Why? They could've stayed at home, played 'submissive' roles to get by, or get treated like an accessory so see no need to travel to a major world city to experience a slight remix of the same record.

While this thread has been running I've been phoned by two Japanese women. I'm leaving shortly for dinner with one of them (and her Austrian boyfriend).Did they call me because they wanted to be submissive accessories? Of course not. If anyone is bandying insulting stereotypes about here it's you, Suzy.

Are you suddenly the best friend of the people you've been happy to call 'braindead Japanese art student groupies'? Or is calling them submissive accessories just another insult? Are they perhaps a minority so oppressed by people like me that they need to be stung into revolt by your reductive stereotypes?

Momus, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Momus + Suzy: Give up and get married.

Momus: Honestly, in what proportions do you think fixated solely- other-race attractions are a product of (a) healthy impulses and inclinations versus (b) rigid mental concepts of how individuals of a particular sex and ethnicity behave? Clearly both exist: which do you think prevails?

It is entirely possible that my perception of this is skewed by living in the more broadly homogenous U.S., where there are broad and ugly strains of white women's Mandingo fetishizing of black males and white men's submissive-prostitute fetishizing of Asian women, and a properly-worded google search will reveal truckloads of porn sites that appear to support this assertion.

Nitsuh, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Honestly, in what proportions do you think fixated solely- other-race attractions are a product of (a) healthy impulses and inclinations versus (b) rigid mental concepts of how individuals of a particular sex and ethnicity behave? Clearly both exist: which do you think prevails?

'Healthy' and 'rigid' are all in the eye of the beholder, surely. I know what you mean, though. The closest I came to uneasiness with this was when I was in Thailand last year and got the feeling that the Pat Pong district of Bangkok had been formed by its former use as a US military R&R area. This is what I call 'your dad's fetishism', which is all about militarisation, brutalisation, and celebration of inequality.

If 'my dad's fetishism' traces its lineage back to Vietnam, then mine traces its roots back to Lennon / Ono. Japan and Britain as two parallel islands of pretty much equal educational and material development (Japan a little ahead, of course, on both), two artists secure in their own careers and respectful of each other's work.

If you go to the ICA in London, you notice that Japanese girls sometimes seem to be the only people there. I am, in human form, the ICA. I am sustained, like that venerable London arts institution, by the patronage and kindness of these hyper- cultuivated people. I also enjoy fucking them.

Momus, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

ICA card going free. Any takers? I don't want mine.

Sarah, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Burning your Beatles records too, Sarah?

Momus, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

So you are now claiming to bethe Beatles in human form? My, we are bigging ourselves up today, aren't we Momus?

RickyT, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Nitsuh: isn't that "mandingo" genre consumed largely by white men, and is rooted in a racist ideology of despoiling miscegenation, rather than a projection of white women themselves? I mean, I *have* been to Franks Lounge with its clientele of art students on the slumming pull, but the "yellow fever" thing seems to be from start to finish a white man's game.

It's funny what Suzy says about Scots, because it seems to me that in Brooklyn there's a thing with many of the local population of English boys being into South Asian girls.

Benjamin, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

What about men who date only Symbionese Liberation Army members? Now that's one sick fetish, brother.

Momus, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Or people who only date Icelandic Mormon Albino webbed-footed diabetics who collect ginger snap packages from Austria between the years 1945-1962?

mike hanle y, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't think: "yellow fever" thing seems to be from start to finish a white man's game.
It frequently seems to be a white woman's game (whether gay or straight) but just doesn't have a war and a history in literature to flesh it out.
Seeing as we don't have many blacks in Australia I can't say whether or not it's a black wo/man's game too - although there was and still is a lot of intermingling of Aboriginals and Chinese in NT.
Is a white man with yellow fever more offensive than an Asian man who prefers Asian girls? If so, why?
Is a white man with yellow fever worse than a white guy who prefers white women?
I find Asian features and colouring more aesthetically pleasing than Caucasian features, I did Japanese at uni & I plan to do Mandarin in the near future, I've studied Shiatsu and some Chinese Medicine and I eat pretty much exclusively Asian food and often shop at Asian grocery stores. Do I have yellow fever? I don't think so, I just like their languages, writing, food and philosophy but (except with the food) not to the exclusion of other cultures.

I don't think there is anything wrong with having a preference over race/gender/colouring/education/religion/employment status/nationality/age etc. Crikey, you've got to spend time with the person, you have every right to be as fussy as you want to be and I don't think it matters WHY you prefer a certain thing, no matter what the cause/history of it, it is how you are now and so you should choose your partner accordingly.

toraneko, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The idea is that this white guy comes along and views an Asian woman (by features or by behavior or whatever) as exotic to spike his punch. His enchantment is entirely based on set white-guy-created stereotypes and so he disregards her humanity. This is why porn, which generally avoids humanization, finds 'Eastern edge' quite suitable for exploitation. The stereotype is taken advantage of, aggravated, embraced, and so on.

Asians preferring Asians or whites preferring whites generally involves less criticism because the preferences are working within an ethnic mundanity of sorts. An Asian who blocks out all other types of people can still be criticized perhaps, but this preference is a more understandable and natural one. It's difficult to perceive it as a degrading fetish since it crosses no ethnic lines.

That said, I'm not sure how often white-Asian couples actually involve any degrading element at all. I don't think it's fair to underestimate the perceptiveness of Asian women. At least in America, and especially in Berkeley where I live, Asians would probably never engage with, let alone last in, a relationship with some fetishizing white-boy monstrosity. If the issue is about naive submissive girls being taken advantage of, I don't see this as being the case around me.

Honda, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

you mean that isn't the real patti hearst?

goeff, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Nick, you're being reductive. Did I say that *all* Japanese women were braindead art student groupies? Of course not: that really would be reductive stereotyping. But I see it all over your posts: 'my Japanese girlfriend' instead of 'my girlfriend, X'. It's things like this that make me believe the person's origins are more important to you than their individual identity.

Perhaps if you'd introduced me to someone who seemed more like an equal to you than a foil or a yes-woman, or bothered to tell me something interesting about them before I met them, I might not have such a poor impression of what, to me, seem like a series of nice but in-over- their-heads young girls happy to endure Misogyny Lite if it means three months of being some minor pop star's plus one (Yoko, on the other hand, was not arm candy for an insecure guy who wanted to look trendy at art openings). But the only thing you appear to have in common with the girls I have met is this: they're interested in you almost as much as you are. But unlike you, they can get bored of you and go away, which, eventually, they do.

suzy, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

As for WMWEDAMen, besides scat, there are few turnoffs worse than having some man coo into your ear "oooh, i just love asian boys" - which happens quite a bit. But hell, its a lot better than hearing "oh, i'm not into asians" - which also happens quite a bit. I'm fairly certain that I couldn't date anyone who has this 'yellow fever'. I would feel somehow cheap - like some eight-year old sewed me together in a Jakarta factory to export for Western consumption. Which I guess is pretty silly.

Though I'm into the whiteys so call me a hypocrite. Though it would be pretty ridiculous if I tapped on your shoulder and swooned "omigod, i just love white guys"...

phil, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

RickyT whatever else one might say about the Beatles they were "in human form" anyway.

Tom, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Erm, yes. I was trying to point out how daft Momus's comment about burning Beatles records was.

RickyT, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

yea, i couldn't understand that either. i mean, i don't even have any Beatles records to burn. do i have to make do with burning Bowie, or Cex, or Nelly or something?

gareth, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Neither do I haf Beatles records! Oy vey! Neither do I haf any Momus records so I can't even burn those! I did ruin a Kenickie record by playing frisbee with it but that was only because it belonged to a poo-head.

Sarah, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

If you've got yellow fever or jungle fever or whatever, select a suitable target, treat them really brilliantly, that way everybody's happy, more good comes out of bad intentions!

dave q, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

By 'really brilliantly' I mean, treat them like you LUV them (as an individual) obv.

dave q, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I actually consider WMWEDAW to be more insulting white women than insulting to Asian women. This is because they are often rejecting their own culture and women.

It's something to do with how as a child your mother should represent the ideal woman - I know this is very often not true, but it would be nice if it was. If you reject your mother's culture/religion/philosophy/race then you are rejecting your origins and you are abandoning your history.

With men who have had previous white girlfriends and wives who then get "yellow fever" and subsequently find white women unattractive there is often no way for their previous girlfriends/wives to compete. If I was a woman in this position I would find it insulting and it would make me feel inadequate - and all the more so because I understand it.

It is very easy to hate your own country and culture and upbringing and to see others as superior, especially if they are very different. Asian culture, from an outsider's point of view, seems far superior to Western culture - hence the fascination with Buddhism, Chinese Medicine and all things Chinese and Japanese that so many people hold today.

It is interesting to note that they tend to reciprocate.

toraneko, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

people exoticize 'the other'. i don't necessarily view this as a negative. personally i do not know whether i would like to be liked as me, or as a something, one of many, rather than a unique. but who knows, maybe i'd like being objectified?

gareth, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

If you reject your mother's culture/religion/philosophy/race then you are rejecting your origins and you are abandoning your history.

I don't think this is how you meant it, but this sounds like National Front propaganda.

fritz, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I personally adore being objectified. I just hope, as I get older, it continues to happen (Germaine Greer says pretty much the same thing in 'The Madwoman's Underclothes').

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

By the way, Suzy, I can guarantee you will never be troubled by any of my friends again. I'm sick of finding personal details of my life in the tabloids.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

*wakes up*

Did someone say 'pedestal'?

*rolls over, goes back to sleep, resuming dream about Hiroshi Sugimoto's 'Seascapes'*

suzy, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i have a hardon for patty hearst...does that make me weird?

goeff, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Suzy + Momus = FITE!

Dan Perry, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

A propos nothing, Paul Barman just replied to my suggestion that he contribute to the Paul Barman thread on ILM with this:

'why in the world would i contribute to a thread of hate like that??

for some reason internet people are particularly obnoxo. i guess cuz it;s anonymo.

thanks for defending me...'

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Lot of yall are right, lot of yall are off, but that HOnda guy has got it nailed. Illustrated the behavior of a LOT of people I know (even brown (indian) crew) without being insulting or sounding totally out of touch. Speaking of which, who gives a fuck in the first place, "Patti Hearst" (and some others here)? I know damn well what Rivers Cuomo gets up to backstage and I can't even begin to think of why this is different/worse/better than the usual cracker groupie scenario. Are your sisters banging their TaeKwonDo instructors or somthing? Who cares? Haha just kdding. Love.

Ramosi, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay, here's the thing. People are getting knickers in a twist over this issue because it contains a cultural faultline between two generally accepted but opposing principles:

1. Everyone is equal and should have equal opportunities in society. (In our case, there should be no racial profiling of potential dates.)

2. Everyone is an individual with a right to personal preferences and the freedom to choose between available options.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

those 2 positions are not contradictory momus.

i'm sorry that paul barman thinks i am full of hate, i am actually full of nougat.

gareth, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i am also sorry paul barman does not think of this board as being worthy of his presence.

gareth, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Paul Barman is a Predator looking muthafucker

Ramosi, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

for some reason internet people are particularly obnoxo. i guess cuz it;s anonymo.

Hey, I know his name and he knows mine. So what's the complaint?

I know damn well what Rivers Cuomo gets up to backstage

Rivers Cuomo would be much more interesting in my eyes if he stayed a hair-metaller. Then he would be honest with himself. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

More accurately, he can find out my name easily enough. ;-)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ramosi, you are EXCELLENT.

Dan Perry, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(sips water) ..... I love you back....

(I stole that from Martin Lawrence HBO special!)

Ramosi, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The only things I'm arguing against, Momus, are:

(a) The prevalence of those "personal preferences" being based on wrongheaded and demeaning expectations of how people of various ethnicities behave.

(b) The related belief that ethnicity is such a major determinant of what people are actually like that it should be the primary factor in dating choices.

(c) The slick (if not slippery) slope between a "personal preference" for one ethnicity and active distaste for another; the flipside of "I like Asian women" (because they are Asian) may well be "I don't like Latin men" (because they are Latino).

(I am also generally just completely sick of west-European-descended white people considering any ethnicity but their own as denoting an identifiable quality in a person, as if they are humans and everyone else is just a quaint aesthetic variation on humanity -- as if we live in a fantasy novel where the "humans" are attracted to the elves but not the dwarves. People who think this way are inevitably angered or just surprised by any assertion that their whiteness "means" anything about them, but they place the same expectations on us dwarves and elves and hobbits 24 / 7.)

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

1. Everyone is equal and should have equal opportunities in society. (In our case, there should be no racial profiling of potential dates.)

2. Everyone is an individual with a right to personal preferences and the freedom to choose between available options.

those 2 positions are not contradictory momus.

They're contradictory every time my freedom to choose is at odds with your right to be chosen, eg because you are the wrong race.

It's like when an employer who's already decided to give the job to a well-qualified insider then advertises it in the paper just to give the world (and legislative bodies) the impression that he's being fair. Equality and discrimination are at odds every time a book reviewer says to one author her book is worth less than another author's. It's a major faultline in our society, like I say.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i think i just see things very differently to you momus. i think maybe i would like to be able to have that very clearly delineated black/white either/or thing that you have going on a bit more. but for me, things are a lot more contextual, and things are going to alter every time. i cannot look at things as having *this factor*, *that factor*. perhaps i lack a bit of logic in these matters. this i concede

i meant that they are not necessarily contradictory. they may be in certain situations, or even society at large, but my brain doesn't process them as contradictory in my own life

i am curios though as to what these qualities asian women or latino men actually have. momus, what qualities do asian women have that is good? is it basically physical/visual (if it is this, i don't necessarily see any problem with that), or is it something else?

gareth, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

also momus, i hope i have not been coming across as antagonistic towards you recently. it is just you have been putting across quite rigid thoughts that i find interesting because it is a very different way of seeing that i am trying to understand more. it is also, because your outlook (at least on these boards - which is all i have to go on) is very different to how i perceived it would be.

gareth, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Methinks Momus just wants to date a culture. And you can't date a culture -- you can only date individuals, and as soon as they realize that you're more interested in what they represent than what they are, they may well have the good sense to leave.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

By the way, Suzy, I can guarantee you will never be troubled by any of my friends again. I'm sick of finding personal details of my life in the tabloids.

Ummm, what? Please stop grandstanding. I couldn't very well have expressed my opinion (and that's all it is - my opinion) without any background to explain how it was formed. If that offends you, I'm sorry, but I think what I've written here falls under one of your favourite categories of forgivable exposition - 'showing all works'. Besides which, our mutual friends see our battles for what they really are: shadow-boxing. And do not take them too seriously for this reason.

suzy, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

personal to phil-two: we'll talk later, yes? :-)

Sean, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Nitsuh's points:

(a) The prevalence of those "personal preferences" being based on wrongheaded and demeaning expectations of how people of various ethnicities behave.

With the caveat that one person's 'wrongheaded and demeaning' is another person's 'acceptable and ennobling', I'm with you on this. See my distinction above between 'Vietnam' and 'Lennon / Ono'.

(b) The related belief that ethnicity is such a major determinant of what people are actually like that it should be the primary factor in dating choices.

Ethnicity is a big determinant, though of course not as big as personality. Japanese all have the same hair and eye colour, for instance, and share a cuisine, a religion, a language, an essential morality, many features of morphology, a culture and a worldview. Japan may be a special case, though. Diasporan races within the US, though, are much less different from each other.

(c) The slick (if not slippery) slope between a "personal preference" for one ethnicity and active distaste for another; the flipside of "I like Asian women" (because they are Asian) may well be "I don't like Latin men" (because they are Latino).

That's like saying my choice to live in Chinatown is simultaneously a choice not to live in every other place in the world. Well, yes, but there's no snub intended to the shantytowns of Sao Paolo!

(I am also generally just completely sick of west-European-descended white people considering any ethnicity but their own as denoting an identifiable quality in a person, as if they are humans and everyone else is just a quaint aesthetic variation on humanity -- as if we live in a fantasy novel where the "humans" are attracted to the elves but not the dwarves. People who think this way are inevitably angered or just surprised by any assertion that their whiteness "means" anything about them, but they place the same expectations on us dwarves and elves and hobbits 24 / 7.)

I certainly don't think of white values as natural, neutral or normal ones. This attitude is my main problem with US foreign policy and US entertainment. My own values are just as racially and culturally determined as anyone else's, and I don't complain when people whisper into my ears (as they have) 'I really dig Scottish guys!' In a way, it's quite a legitimate position. We Scots are alike in certain ways.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i only fancy ppl i don't like much => my fault-line = worse than modern society's => i despise modern society for being less complex than me = i want to date it

mark s, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Granted, Nick: the difference is that you are arguing theory and I am arguing practice. I have no doubt that people all across the world -- particularly in more culturally heterogenous lands than the U.S. -- have healthy interests in, respects for, and inclinations toward other cultures. Well and good. My only point is that it's a slow fade from that reasonable identification of cultural traits into plain-out stereotyping, and a slow fade from stereotyping to demeaning stereotyping -- and am I the only one here who finds it demeaning? I can vouch from experience that I feel hugely demeaned by people who want to have sex with me based on expectations based on race, based on some racialist fantasy that I cannot live up to and which prohibits the person in question from accepting the good qualities I can offer, as they don't fit into the stereotype.

Millions of people aren't doing that with the other-race or other-culture attractions. But millions of people are. And given the word "exclusively" in the title of this thread -- suggesting an absolute fixation -- that's the type I'm thinking of.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

based on some racialist fantasy that I cannot live up to

Oh, Nitsuh, you're probably measuring wrong.

Sean, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I thought John Lennon was initially attracted to Yoko Ono for reasons other than her race. In fact, he had previously had a thing for blondes.

Kerry, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

For the last thirty years my dad has driven exclusively Volvo cars, because he likes their popular stereotype as 'safe'. Does that mean he's demeaning them, or ignoring their ability to go fast and be dangerous when he drives them recklessly?

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Kerry, yes, Ono was Lennon's first Asian partner. His next was May Pang.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think it is naive and patronising to believe that the Japanese share one homogeneous cuisine, religion, language, essential morality, culture and worldview. This seems to hark back to to an image put forward by an Imperial Japan dead since that Empire shed its pretentions to a devine right and a chosen people. An idea that wasn't even true during that period, as soiety with as many facets as any other. This view seems to encompass a predjudicial lie and I hope when you make it to Japan you will find that Japanese culture is as diverse and full of just as many joys and failings as the 'Brutish' culture you have striven so hard to escape.

Ed, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"Choosing your car is like making love to a beautiful woman" — Momus Tony

mark s, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Wow, Momus. That analogy was so horrible it could have come from me.

Dan Perry, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ed, I live in Japan half the year. I work with Japanese artists. I write about Japan for magazines like Index and Metropolis. This is not just hearsay.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The problem I find in this thread is that I'm seeing a lot of (after the fact?) justifications given for things which people probably don't completely understand about themselves.

Also, just because you wouldn't mind being 'objectified' doesn't mean that those who find it tiresome are wrong or puritanical. Again, subjectivity is being generalized into some principle here, and that's just wrong. It seems whenever I go out, or get involved in something, there's always some guy who won't leave me alone just because he likes the way I look (they think I'm 'goth' or 'romantic' or something), when it's clear to me that he's nowhere near my social type (he's a hippie, a corporate type, a computer geek, he doesn't know anything about art, etc.). It just makes me feel sad for that person, that he's so unaware of himself or what he wants from life that he'll fantasize about and chase after a 'type', showing no perceptiveness whatsoever with regard to character.

I'm not saying this about you, Momus, I'm just trying to explain where people are coming from.

Kerry, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

he's a hippie, a corporate type, a computer geek

Seems to me you're making as much of a superficial judgement about them as they are about you! Just my perception... I do it too.

Sean, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The car analogy IS completely demeaning, you know.

Here's the thing, in theory this makes lots of sense, in practice it isn't as neat as you've claimed it to be, Momus. Everyone's right: Asian women are not all one homogenous clump. You've made big points on other threads (unfortunately long past - if someone is arsed they can probably look them up on Google but I don't remember which thread it was) about how Japanese women are so much nicer than Western Women and so much sweeter and innocent...in practice, it sounds like you are one big Geisha Girl fetishist who views Japanese women as one big stereotypical lump of girly girls. If this is not how you are, then apologies in advance, but these are all quotes or near quotes of things you've said previously (indeed, once was a direct insult towards me and, I believe, Suzy - which is why I remember the words - as to how we are hellion firehounds of the West and all your supposed Japanese submissives are wonderful and innocent and sweeter than cherry pie).

I personally do not have a problem with you doing this. It doesn't affect me, and I also have my own dating prejudices, as I'm sure even the most honorable here do (I am not physically attracted to Hispanic men or Italian men, for example - I am just not one for the black hair/olive skin Latin thing. Nor, for example, am I attracted to redheaded men). But I believe, based on past examples and even a few comments on this thread, you are arguing theory and not practice. I think I'd respect you better if you just admitted the racist tendency of dating one race exclusively and stopped trying to convince everyone that the entirety of Japan are all identical twins.

Ally, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

it's clear to me that he's nowhere near my social type (he's a hippie, a corporate type, a computer geek, he doesn't know anything about art, etc.). It just makes me feel sad for that person, that he's so unaware of himself or what he wants from life that he'll fantasize about and chase after a 'type', showing no perceptiveness whatsoever with regard to character.

With respect, Kerry, aren't you ignoring himbecause of exactly the same kind of stereotyping that you're complaining lies at the root of his irritating failure to ignore you?

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I believe everyone does that, and it's more respectful to understand and admit your prejudices than to hide them behind theory (this goes to anyone reading, btw).

Ally, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Japanese women are so much nicer than Western Women and so much sweeter and innocent..

Sweetness and innocence are conventions, just as brashness and argumentativeness are. When Japanese PM Junichiro Koizumi fired his foreign minister Makiko Tanaka yesterday, he commented that her tears were 'the greatest weapon of a woman'. Perhaps she was using 'sweetness' the way Madeleine Allbright or Margaret Thatcher would have used steely resolve and harsh words about 'betrayal'.

I personally like societies where people at least pretend to be sweet. And I also think that it's a much better way to get what you want. (I should try it some time myself.)

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

You can tell a lot about a person by the way they dress and how they express themselves. You can't tell a lot about them because they have pale skin and long curly hair and big boobs. Ergo, I am neither stereotyping nor superficial. Sorry - I need to be around creative people. That's not stereotyping - those are my values. Beyond that, I'm not all that particular with regard to specific features. I'm not some SF geek's medieval princess.

Kerry, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sweetness and innocence are conventions, just as brashness and argumentativeness are.

In a better world, they would be. In our world, however, the expectation that women be 'sweet' and 'innocent' does a hell of a lot of psychic damage. It just dovetails a little too neatly with male chauvinism.

Kerry, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm all for equality of sweetness. Why should the girls have all the sugar, and all the energy you get from it?

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

And what happened to Momus, the cosmopolitan cultural relativist? Sorry, I come from an urban culture in which women most definitely are not 'sweet and innocent' or 'girly' (that Hello Kitty barrette-wearing twee crap enrages me). The problem isn't that you're attracted to a particular culture - it's that there's always this implication that so many others are inferior in comparison...and you've even said that Japanese culture is superior. Honestly, this does not befit a 'cosmopolitan' open-minded artist type - it's very...insular. I'm not surprised by your comparisions between Britain and Japan here. This is all very 'Brutish' if you will.

Kerry, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

How can you have had so much contact with Japanese culture and been so blinkered. Even what the Japanese government sends over as 'cultural exhibits' show more diversity than the mythylogical society you fetishise over. There's a whole argument to had over the historical stereotyping of oriental culture, but surely we are beyond all that. Aren't we supposed to have learnt something from the last century.

Ed, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think this discussion could safely have ended with Momus's Volvo analogy: all he needs to do now is seek out the factory where they mass-produce Japanese women in quality-controlled, series-numbered batches. I was prepared to say that maybe Momus was taking this too personally -- that some of us were arguing against more general practices, and not necessarily all practices or his practices -- but in a couple brief sentences, he's thrown open a window to where his thinking goes all wrong. Somewhere out there is an anomalous supercharged Volvo roadster, lonely and weeping.

Sean: that was damn funny, but now we need Supposedly-Big Dan to drop by and discuss some other aspects of the racialist fantasizing.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Here we get back to the right of all cultures to be 'equal' versus my right as an individual to have a preference.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I personally like societies where people at least pretend to be sweet. And I also think that it's a much better way to get what you want.

...and most American women I know DO this. Can't vouch for Brits, obviously. It's not exactly a Japanese trait. It's something drilled into virtually all women from the get go, it's very difficult to "buck" the stereotypes expected of oneself.

Ally, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Nitsuh: I got to that joke before you. Look at the Momus website and you'll see it's headed this week 'Momus reads Replicant', a reference to the Daily Photo page, which shows a picture of popular Japanese cyber-character magazine Replicant, which comes with a CD-ROM which allows you to build your own 'idoru'.

It's just this sort of loony 'pygmalism' which endears Japanese culture to me. Ask my Japanese friends whether they feel like robots or dolls, though, and they'll be insulted -- at you, not me.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

[...] but now we need Supposedly-Big Dan to drop by [...]

"Supposedly"?

Dan Perry, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Here we get back to the right of all cultures to be 'equal' versus my right as an individual to have a preference.

Quit being an ass and listen, Momus. It has nothing to do with the equality of cultures, and your insistence on turning it into that is precisely what I'm complaining about: an exclusive focus on "culture" and "ethnicity" denies individuals the right to have individual identies, to internalize portions of their native culture, reject others, and do the same picking and choosing from any other culture they encounter. What you want to date is Japan, not its citizens.

And note, rights-wise, that we all respect people's rights to do a hell of a lot of things that are nevertheless wrongheaded and idiotic.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"Supposedly"?

You been lying to me all this time, Dan? I'm crushed.

(Note: I *would* say something serious on this thread, really, but I think the debates here are being argued far more interestingly and with better thought than I could offer. All I'll say is I've dated people from many different ethnic backgrounds, and I was attracted to them all because they were smart, funny and friendly. What more do you need, really? :-))

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I did answer this point with my Volvo metaphor, but I guess it wasn't well-chosen. And don't insult my ancestors, who were respectable African donkeys.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

...and hung accordingly.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Couldn't we say of people who fail to have sex with farmyard animals, selecting instead human beings, that they want to 'date the human race rather than individuals within it'? Is their failure to couple with donkeys all part of a demeaning tendency to stereotype humans?

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

You're moving baby steps from the demeaning car analogy, Momus -- I was unaware that Japanese women constituted a different species.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(The question is not whether one has a preference for others of a certain ethnicity, but why. At risk of repeating myself, I sense that very few people do it for healthy or agreeable reasons, and while I was willing to grant that you might, your arguments are actually making me think the opposite.)

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, I am a very bad person indeed.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Japanese women are Volvos and donkeys. Momus, you better hope you never get actually famous because you know the tabloids will dig up this shit and use it on you, no matter how you meant it. I mean, honestly now. :)

Ally, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Are we only supposed to have heathy and agreeable desires, Nitsuh? Sounds pretty dull to me.

fritz, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Couldn't we say of people who fail to have sex with farmyard animals, selecting instead human beings, that they want to 'date the human race rather than individuals within it'?

Sure, if you are a MENTALIST. That analogy isn't even self-consistent; you're equating non-Japanese women with farmyard animals.

I agree with the broad point, which is that an attraction to a particular ethnicity is not necessarily any more sinister than an attraction to a particular hair color, but the parallels you're drawing are frightmarish.

Dan Perry, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think Dan's got it right there - the problem for me isn't what you're doing, I think that everyone to an extent does this because people are all different and all physically and mentally attracted to different things. But the way you put it, Momus, is a little creepy.

ALly, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

And, incidentally, the farmyard animals analogy still fails, insofar as a person whose "exclusive" sexual criteria was "it is a donkey" would still be failing to respect or appreciate the unique and meaningful qualities each individual donkey has to offer.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(Dan and Ally speak of "preferences" whereas Momus demonstrates the territory through which ethnic preference wanders closer and closer to racialist dogmatism.)

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(can i just say that while i remain totally unswung by momus's basic line of argt, i do not for ONE SECOND believe that his remarks abt volvos and donkeys were anything except deliberately self-satirising — dodgy — jokes...)

mark s, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

OOOO, THAT RASCALLY INNOCENT CHARMER!

Mike Hanle y, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

No, they're definitely just very dodgy analogies and not actually equating the Japanese with farmyard animals and cars, but even with that it's a bit off...and like I said he better hope to god no journalist is digging for dirt on him via internet ;)

Ally, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry, Mark: I am being a typically humorless activist right now because this issue is a very central one in my life. Plus I am always annoyed by the way that when masses of other people make very good points in opposition to Momus's, he retreats to childish jokes and revels in the attention of everyone getting annoyed with him. And yes, I realize that my annoyance only perpetuates this cycle.

By the way, the "exclusive" in the question itself makes "preference" a red herring, in that it speaks not of "inclination" but of a rigid and dogmatic approach involving programmatic "exclusion."

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm glad you're pointing up the logical inconsistencies and red herrings in your argument yourself, Nitsuh.

The statement 'an exclusive focus on "culture" and "ethnicity" denies individuals the right to have individual identies...' is, on a philosophical level, circular and tautological. On an existential level -- if we look at the life of a person choosing to date only people from one race -- it's simply wrong. Within a gay man's predetermined fetish category of 'Hispanic males', for instance, there is nothing in his 'exclusivity' that stops him selecting some and rejecting others based on their qualities as individuals.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Likewise, using the genetic category of "Hispanic" as the number-one exclusive sorting mechanism, and only then proceeding to worry about piddling little details like personal identity, in itself creates a heirarchy within which our individual thoughts and ideas and personalities can never hope to trump our genetic predestinations, to which I say: (a) bullshit, and (b) go don your kilt, Momus.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Does it make a difference to your argument Nitsuh that we're talking about sexual rather than social association?

Tom, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(a) But we're not speaking sexually, are we, Tom? I'm reading "date" to mean not "have sex with" but date, intimate dating relationships implying emotional and social elements and in extreme cases marriage.

(b) If we were speaking strictly sexually, wouldn't this make it ten times worse? Strictly-sexual fetishes for people of other ethnicities, people you want sexually but exclude from emotional and social ties? (This is the case with the white American Mandingo fantasy, in just about every instance; sexual tourism based on demeaning stereotypes yippee.)

(c) Or do you mean that one values people emotionally based on their character, but just happens to have an aesthetic or physical liking of a particular ethnicity? But if one rates those physical aesthetics so highly that they become an exclusive criterion -- well, it might not be evil, but it's about as shallow as one can possibly get. And besides, Momus doesn't say this: he speaks about culture and some sort of archtypical Japanese-woman personality he sees value in. He does not say "I find them physically attractive and then plenty of them happen to be lovely people."

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

No, I was kind of talking generally rather than about Momus, and meaning point c. Shallowness isn't a moral problem for me. (Actually racially demeaning sexual fantasies aren't a moral problem for me either - it's when the expectations they center on are carried over into real life that things suddenly turn nasty, and I'm aware that a lot of people have difficulty separating fantasy from reality.)

Tom, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i don't know whether i find the idea of ILX as a tabloid or momus *in* a tabloid more unlikely...

also, you realise this will now come top of the list if anyone googles "momus is a donkey fucker", even before i said that...

CarsmileSteve, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

if "strictly sexually" is "ten times worse" then being lesbian = you wish to abolish men? which surely = untrue?

mark s, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, like I started off saying, I don't really have too much of a problem with point (c) -- we're all conditioned with difficult-to- shake notions of "beauty," and we live our lives accordingly. I don't blame anyone for following these inclinations.

I will, however, admit to being bothered when racial characteristics play very strongly into people's notions of "beauty," because in the majority of those cases I sense that there are distorted expectations and stereotypes lingering somewhere behind them. Anytime you meet anyone who's absolutely rabid for a particular physical characteristic, there tends to be something wrong and unhealthy lingering behind that.

But yeah, I'm not arguing against aesthetic or cultural attractions to people of various ethnicities. I just don't like how closely it treads to very, very racialized thinking. And I admit that this is a rather personal thing, based on growing up being near-immediately excluded as a possible interest by everyone around me based on race and not identity -- and subsequently being racially pigeonholed based on behavior (when doing something bad, I was uniformly considered "black" -- when doing something intelligent, I was repeatedly told that I was "not really black.") Which is not to say I dislike these preferences because they don't work in my favor -- as I've said, they have worked in my favor, and that was even worse.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

if "strictly sexually" is "ten times worse" then being lesbian = you wish to abolish men? which surely = untrue?

I actually don't follow you, Mark. What I mean is that objectifying an entire race of people as sexual playthings, with whom you wouldn't dream of having actual human social or emotional ties, is a very bad thing. (NB I'm not saying anyone here is arguing for or doing that. But I have encountered people who are precisely that way, and it is ugly.)

Lesbians would only enter into this if they had sex with one another but only had relationships with men. Which is not the case.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

David Bowie will now take his turn in the bearpit to discuss his attraction to Cherry Vanilla, Iman etc.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

By the way, I did a Google search on 'Momus is a donkey fucker' and all that came up was a page at the Cornell University math department.

http://www.math.cornell.edu/~dbenbenn/java/wordmine/wordlist

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

safe for the moment

Nitsuh I was trying to distil what I tht Tom's line of enquiry was to a single iconic wossname. But I may have failed.

mark s, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Even the admirably rapid Google* isn't going to have picked up on this thread's donkey-fucking revelations quite yet.

*which is archiving FT stuff the day after I get it up, meaning search-sent readers of NYLPM are actually seeing relevant** current content, miraculously!

**possibly not the most apt word.

Tom, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

snap!!

but jeez those dirty maths sods at cornell hey? whodathunk?

mark s, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Who is Patty Hearst anyway? I could, of course, search, but I'd rather ask.

You can tell a lot about a person by the way they dress and how they express themselves. You can't tell a lot about them because they have pale skin and long curly hair and big boobs. Ergo, I am neither stereotyping nor superficial. Sorry - I need to be around creative people. That's not stereotyping - those are my values. Beyond that, I'm not all that particular with regard to specific features. I'm not some SF geek's medieval princess.

I disagree that it's easy to tell whether someone is creative by the way they dress. If they dress like computer geeks, so what? The best musicians and writers I know dress quite unremarkably. True, they're not famous, but that doesn't make them less creative.

Maria, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ahh, I see, Mark. Yeah, I am not at all saying that a preference for Type X is somehow unfair or demeaning to Types Y and Z. I'm just saying that maybe X, Y, and Z aren't categories that should be of primary import -- and even the Type X people might be bothered to know that they're liked for being Type X, as they may well think what's important about them is that they're (non-ethnically) Type D or Q.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I can't believe this thread has gone on this long without even one mention of Furverts!

I'm very disappointed.

Brian MacDonald, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(I.e. personally I am not pissed that hardly anyone fancies Ethiopians, I am pissed that anyone should think of my Ethiopianicity as a primary reason to fancy or not-fancy me.)

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Let X be donkey and X and Z humans.

So they're saying at Cornell Math Dept, and so they're saying at my house.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I disagree that it's easy to tell whether someone is creative by the way they dress.

Of course not - I work and study at an art college, so I know this. I'm not talking about 'non-dressing', I'm talking about a backwards baseball cap, or a Bears sweatshirt, or a business suit, or a tie-dye shirt, or, most importantly, a t-shirt with planets on it and a big pentagram around his neck, or a guy who runs around in an 'ethnic' shawl (one who is chasing me now - bad 'High Fidelity' Tim Robbins type guy).

Kerry, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Let X be donkey and X and Z humans.

There you go, Brian.

Dan Perry, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll assume you mean "Y" for the second one, and flesh things out a bit -- so okay:

"I am not at all saying that a preference for donkeys is somehow unfair or demeaning to humans. I'm just saying that maybe donkeys and humans aren't categories that should be of primary import -- and even the donkeys might be bothered to know that they're liked for being donkeys, as they may well think what's important about them is that they're libertarians or film buffs."

Assuming it was possible to have healthy communicative relationships with donkeys, or for donkeys to have overarching personality interests like film or politics, I would completely stand by that.

Nitsuh, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

the key term in all this is INTERCHANGEABILITY? if i say "i fancy nitsuh" and this is by my behaviour sensibly interpretable by nitsuh and the wider world as EXACTLY EQUIVALENT to saying "i fancy 20 million people exactly interchangeability and nitsuh is just v.to hand", then this is somewhat disrespectful?

mark s: "Momus I fancy you"
Momus: "Naturally"
mark s: "Er I thought you would ask why. Ask why."
Momus: "Why?"
mark s: "Because then my little thought experiment will work properly you fop!"
Momus: "No I meant why do you fancy me?"
mark s: "Aha! Because you have a penis and THERE IS NO OTHAH REASON!!"
Momus: "Grrrr I am demeaned."

mark s, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry, in my haste I got my sets / sex theory a bit muddled.

I am not at all saying that a preference for Type X is somehow unfair or demeaning to Types Y and Z. I'm just saying that maybe X, Y, and Z aren't categories that should be of primary import -- and even the Type X people might be bothered to know that they're liked for being Type X, as they may well think what's important about them is that they're (non-ethnically) Type D or Q.

In above example, let X=donkey. Let Y and Z=human. Let D = introvert donkey and Q = extravert donkey.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(there are two 'i's and a 't' in my post which have been introduced by a prankish compositor: see if you can spot them)

mark s, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

You know, Mark, in my experience of love and sex, the question why is very rarely asked. Partly, as you jest, because the loved person always considers him / herself inherently loveable. Partly because we never know why we love someone (or even a donkey), we just do. And partly because we are conditioned to love and to mate.

If the question comes up, it is usually answered with prefab formulae, rings, and whisperings whose acoustic properties (that tickles!) are more important than their semantic content.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Of course not - I work and study at an art college, so I know this. I'm not talking about 'non-dressing', I'm talking about a backwards baseball cap, or a Bears sweatshirt, or a business suit, or a tie-dye shirt, or, most importantly, a t-shirt with planets on it and a big pentagram around his neck, or a guy who runs around in an 'ethnic' shawl (one who is chasing me now - bad 'High Fidelity' Tim Robbins type guy).

What are you talking about? I've read this over but...WHAT?

Maria, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Right up at the top of this thread bnw said Exclusively dating any ethnicity seems pretty stupid. I always figure my dating chances are pretty slim as is!

But what if zeroing in on a particular culture actually multiplied your dating opportunities? What if moving to another country actually changed your rated attractiveness? I've known Americans who couldn't get dates in the US, who moved to London and could. They profited from positive stereotypes of 'Americanness', without ever being reducible to them.

We live in a world where you can travel about and find a culture that 'fits' you. You can harness stereotypes to your own ends without being crushed by them. Stereotypes have power, but they are not all-powerful. Why not get out from under your oppressive stereotype, fill it with the wind, and combine it with rudder action so that it takes you where you want to go?

You will always have time to reveal 'who you really are' when the spastic urgency of orgasm subsides and it's just two people lying side by side.

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

You will always have time to reveal 'who you really are' when the spastic urgency of orgasm subsides and it's just two people lying side by side.

Yes, but most of the time you just end up talking to yourself, seeing as you're the only person there.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

There's the next thread right there: White Men Who Exclusively Date Themselves...

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

People who exclusively date a particular race (or haircolour/height/profession etc.) might be doing it because they once met someone who they fell in love/adoration with who was a particular race/height/colour etc. and they're just trying to re- enact that - sort of like a junky having more hits, always trying to reach that first high.

In which case, although the attraction to the first person with the desirable "traits" would not necessarily be insulting, attraction to subsequent persons with said "traits" could be construed as such.

I find it really insulting when people are attracted to me because I remind them of someone else - I hate it more than people being attracted to me just for my looks rather than my personality/mind.

toraneko, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Well, according to Freud we are attracted to partners who remind us of our opposite sex parent. I suppose attractions to gay people and Asians would be some sort of neurotic deviation for Freud -- perhaps a sublimation of unacceptable Oedipal wishes.

I have noticed that some Japanese women resemble my maternal grandmother, though. I don't know what to call this complex... what Greek hero was drawn fatally to his maternal grandmother? Did the ancient Greeks even live long enough to have grandparents left when they were of an age capable of lust?

Momus, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I find people are attracted to what they wish they had in themselves and repulsed by what they dont like about themselves. Therefore, opposites attract, and birds of a feather flock together.

mike hanle y, Wednesday, 30 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Re: Freud, that's sort of what I was talking about when I said It's something to do with how as a child your mother should represent the ideal woman - I know this is very often not true, but it would be nice if it was. If you reject your mother's culture/religion/philosophy/race then you are rejecting your origins and you are abandoning your history.

As for the Greek thing, I think you're referring to Oedipus, and it was his mum that he was involved with, not his grandma. Interesting to note that he didn't know she was his mum - she was part of his "reward" when he became king for saving Thebes from the Sphynx (the throne and her hand were available because the king was dead, by Oedipus's hand although, once again, he did not know it was his father when he killed him).

I've always thought the more important part of the so called "Oedipus Complex" was the bit where you want to kill your same sex parent, rather than the bit where you want to bonk your opposite sex parent.

toraneko, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i do not understand why momus never answers my questions or points.

gareth, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

perhaps if you weave them into shaw-like dramas, as i do?

mark s, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

You scare him

Why are people attracted to people anyway? It's completely fucking stupid and people shouldn't be so proud of themselves.

N., Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Toraneko, thanks for explaining the meaning of the Oedipus complex to me. Of course I knew the story of Oedipus, I was making a joke about trying to find a figure from Greek mythology who would sum up the concept of 'repressed grannyfuck'.

Gareth, I don't know what points of yours I missed, but I am not the only person on this thread -- a thread which was started by someone who thought it too controversial even to risk giving his / her real name (hello 'Patty Hearst'), and in which I have apparently been the only person to defend the proposition -- with my real name and real e mail address, and with the real names of my ex-lovers kindly supplied by Suzy with dates of tenure and reasons for failure. Thanks also to those who accused me of inverted racism, and those who read my metaphors and parables so literally that they 'witnessed' me saying Japanese women were donkeys and Volvo cars.

I am going back to my magical land of love now, where all is joy and harmony. Do not disturb.

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

well at least it's been entertaining

Maria, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Wait just a second. Nowhere on this thread or any other have I given the names of any of Nick's Japanese girlfriends past or present - there is ABSOLUTELY NO WAY I would ever do such a thing. For Nick to assert that I have done this really beggars belief. For what it's worth I hope he finds someone who'll make him happy enough to treat her with a bit of respect. Sigh. Years ago I tried to do this, and we've even tried to keep a friendship, but there's just no pleasing some people...

suzy, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Suzy wrote: I might not have such a poor impression of what, to me, seem like a series of nice but in-over- their-heads young girls happy to endure Misogyny Lite if it means three months of being some minor pop star's plus one (Yoko, on the other hand, was not arm candy for an insecure guy who wanted to look trendy at art openings). But the only thing you appear to have in common with the girls I have met is this: they're interested in you almost as much as you are. But unlike you, they can get bored of you and go away, which, eventually, they do.

You write 'em, I read 'em, you deny writing 'em.

Now let's see who else in this conversation wants to have their past relationships delved over with this amount of detail, and with this kind of moralistic opprobrium. It is exactly like the British tabloids: name and shame.

By the way, I think Nitsuh made, but didn't extrapolate from, the best point on this thread when he said he hated it when white Europeans saw their own race as invisible and natural and all others as colourful and exotic. If there is no such thing as a neutral racial category, then none of our racial choices are innocent.

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

There, curse of the italics on you all!

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

B-but Suzy didn't mention any NAMES (which is the accusation she's objecting to), unless....unless...

BLIMEY Momus you've been going out with YOKO!!

Tom, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Am I the only one who read that as Suzy addressing your Lennon/Oko comparison?

Dan Perry, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't understand.

M: 'and with the real names of my ex-lovers kindly supplied by Suzy'

S: 'Nowhere on this thread or any other have I given the names of any of Nick's Japanese girlfriends past or present'

M quotes S not mentioning any names (I *assume* Yoko is a reference to Yoko Ono so unless Momus has been dating her - wow there's a story)

M: 'You write 'em, I read 'em, you deny writing 'em.'

Eh? You two are funny.

N., Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh - TRIPLE snap!

N., Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yoko = v.common japanese name for girls (also my sistah's new KITTEN hurrah). Since Momus has dated all Japanese women d'un certain age hence his authoritative expertise, he has dated at least one called Yoko, hence assumes S means them (one of). Suzy however was clearly talking abt ms Y.Ono (or Oko as Dan compressedly calls her) who Momus has not dated as she = un certain autre age.

mark s, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Nick, *of course* I was talking about Yoko Ono. Why on Earth would I mention any of your girlfriends on ILE by name? I don't think such revelations would be wise or appropriate. Go on, tell me why I'd do this or back off in apology form. Bear in mind, though, that the former option will make you look *very* paranoid indeed.

suzy, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think Yoko's still cute and very cool, though! Age ain't nothing but a numbah, Mark.

Nicole, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"nothing but a numbah" is not a phrase i totally undahstand, nicole: since it depends WHICH numbah obv

(eg if momus's g/f = 5 that is poor, but 4 or 7, ok)

mark s, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think it has something to do with shoe size.

Nicole, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

OK, I got the wrong Yoko. But that does little to excuse the completely poisonous stuff around it.

Let's see, Judge Suzy has 'a poor impression'. The girls are 'nice but in-over- their- heads' (=shallow?), 'happy to endure Misogyny Lite' (Momus, natch=mysogynist as well as 'some minor pop star'). Momus also = insecure guy who needs 'arm candy... to look trendy at art openings' Girls are interested in Momus only fractionally less than Momus is interested in himself (Momus = narcissus), therefore leave, bored.

For this I am supposed to apologise? It degrades both myself and the girls who have been my partners (in most cases in relationships measurable in years, and ended only by tearful returns to Japan because the money's dried up), and I'd like to know who will be next to get the Suzy treatment? Have you told Suzy anything about your relationships? How would you feel if she made a similar analysis of them to the one she made of mine, and posted it on a thread in ILE? Honestly?

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

What if you don't have any 'exotic' fetishes per se, but really enjoy using racial epithets while talking dirty to somebody when you're shagging them?

dave q, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I would expect nothing less of you, Dave. You are my hero.

N., Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Dave Q = new UN Secretary General. Oh, you know it.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

If it matters, I am the one who started this thread. I am Patti Hearst. I'm sorry Momus if you feel like you took all the heat in this argument. I guess I just wanted to eavesdrop on this conversation more than be an active participant. I don't feel any responsibility to defend a certain position (or even have a definite position) simply because I posted the question. (Side-question: Do you think that one need be a participant in discussions you initiate here?) My girlfriend of the past five years is Japanese, but I have not exclusively dated Asian women. I've heard "yellow fever" and "rice king" cracks from friends and acquaintances. it's funny how eople who are constantly on guard against letting slip a sexist or racist remark in other circumstances will make a wink wink nudge nudge racist remark about your girlfriend, but I digress.

I will say that I found the discussion really interesting and I'm glad I just let it unfold without intruding much. I wasn't all that surprised to see people on both sides casually assume that Asian women had certain stereotypical traits. I'm used to that presumption. I was surprised to see how many people were willing to (however guardedly) ascribe sinister motives behind white men who date outside their own race. To live with someone from another culture and try to build a life together actually requires from both people patience, tolerance, and openmindedness: the opposites of the characteristics ascribed to the hypothetical race-traitors attacked above.

fritz, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry Momus, I was just making a joke. Clearly if somebody posted vast amounts of stuff criticising the way I conduct my relationship my reaction would be a mixture of "I will kick your ass" and "Blimey what if they're right". I'd also be well aware the rest of the board would be thinking it was very interesting gossip.

Tom, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

they fight! and fight! and fight and fight and fight! fight fight fight! fight fight fight! it's the momus and suuuuuzy shooooooow!

i like my song.

therese, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yikes. I'm sorry for mean comments up above - I was drunk and Momus was being infuriating - but this is certainly an odd topic change. I think some dialogue off boards maybe is needed? I'm certainly not one to judge your personal relationships. Records or articles on the other hand... heh.

Sarah, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Word, Fritz. Wot you sed. Thanks, Sarah. Attack my records and essays all you like. There I'm 'a public figure'. Here I'm just

Your humble servant,

Nick Currie, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

ok if anything i said came off poisonous momus it wasn't meant to

suzy and momus are the sole creators, curators and guarantors of the health of their friendship ("get a room" i suppose except the topic was too interesting, so no one said that); they can defend one another (or not), on or off the boards

in defence of (most of?) those not included in this dyad, however, it was actually M not S first brought up (here) that he "is the ICA" and that is where his preference are to be found foregathered, which was possibly ahem a risky rhetorical strategy, subsequently more than compounded by the volvo-donkey jokes.

mark s, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

they can defend one another = they can defend themselves i guess

mark s, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I think in principle it's fine to especially fancy people of another colour or nationality, but you should probably question your reasons for doing so. If it's just an irreducible 'leg man' thing then fine, but I'm sure in some cases it is about ascribing certain traits to them that are probably a bit dodgy. I find myself v.rarely really fancying non-white women (despite being able to appreciate their beauty in an objective way) and sometimes worry about this. It may be a reflection of my narrowness of mind or it may be that I just don't meet that many in a social context, or it may be that I am a racist thug. I have no idea.

N., Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

what does "the ICA" mean?

Patti Hearst, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

But why was that risky, Mark? It seemed like a good illustration of the idea of 'cultural fit' and 'elective affinities'. Hundreds of people walking around the streets may be Arsenal Football Stadium in human form, and hundreds might be the ICA. The latter will be more attractive to Japanese women, as a general rule.

Momus -- er, Nick, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Institute of Contemporary Art, the Mall, London. Bookstore, cinema, theatre, art gallery and cafe. Cosmopolitan atmosphere, cutting edge design in an elegant Nash terrace between Trafalgar Square and Buckingham Palace. Also has a history of important independent music events. I guarantee every time you go there you will see 20-something Japanese women.

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

"If you go to the ICA in London, you notice that Japanese girls sometimes seem to be the only people there. I am, in human form, the ICA. I am sustained, like that venerable London arts institution, by the patronage and kindness of these hyper- cultivated people. I also enjoy fucking them."

= "you are hereby given permission to discuss my sex life" (possibly) = risky strategy

The ICA-ness = actually not relevant (except as guaranteed red rag to certain pished bullZoR).

mark s, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Hundreds of people walking around the streets may be Arsenal Football Stadium in human form, and hundreds might be the ICA. The latter will be more attractive to Japanese women, as a general rule.

although it would be interesting to see if Junichi Inamoto has had any effect on this

gareth, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

= "you are hereby given permission to discuss my sex life" (possibly) = risky strategy

Come on, sex is implied in the thread title, I wasn't the one who introduced it. I was being theoretical and impersonal, but people were calling me on that too.

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

although it would be interesting to see if Junichi Inamoto has had any effect on this

I would *love* to see the effects of hoardes of Japanese girls descending on British football crowds.

N., Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm assuming Inamoto is a Japanese football player? If so, Japanese women will be completely indifferent to him. He will play a bit part in the locker-room scenarios of rice queen jocks. A couple of women in Scunthorpe will wonder if his skin is 'smooth as silk'.

Japanese women fantasize about Japanese pro-wrestlers and Chinese Triad gangsters. The ones I know, anyway. When they're not fantasising about fey yet intellectually macho Scottish singers.

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

For this I am supposed to apologise?

Um, no? (Is that the right answer? No-one told me there'd be a quiz...)

Dan Perry, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

OK you may possibly be korrekt Momus in some abstract field of judgment, as to what ought to have been read into that paragraph.

HOWEVER you DID say this after which ppl DID start discussing your (ie YOUR) sex life: eg (possibly) they felt they had been given permission by your words. Clearly this was not intended by you: hence the "risk" of the strategy —> it delivered not the winning move in an an argt as hoped but loadsa stuff you were unhappy with.

Maybe what then transpired would have happened anyway. But maybe you speeded up its arrival by the way you worded that paragraph.

"Risky" is not meant mean or anything: just a comment on how yr game actually panned out eg not as you would have liked.

mark s, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I was OK for taking my shift down there in the bearpit as 'world's strangest living curiosity, White Man Who Dates etc'. But some people poked sticks that penetrated through the bear suit to real flesh and blood. So I climbed back out, growling.

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm assuming Inamoto is a Japanese football player? If so, Japanese women will be completely indifferent to him.

I'm not one for knocking all generalisations, as Robin C. knows, but isn't this kind of thing a bit OTT given the context of the discussion. Surely some Japanese women like football? Maybe not, I don't know.

N., Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

By the way, Fritz: I think you're (a) misconstruing a lot of the arguments presented here, and (b) maybe shouldn't have put the word "exclusively" in the thread title. By which I mean this: the relationship that you describe sounds like a perfectly lovely one, in which you've encountered a person from another culture who you care for and have basically made good on that. I don't think anyone here has any arguments against that.

What I'm arguing against is basically the same thing your acquaintances are doing with their "yellow fever" cracks -- they're refusing to see your girlfriend as an individual and basically just thinking "Oh, Fritz likes the Japanese women now." This mentality -- seeing race as this foremost criteria in amorous interaction -- is what peeves me. You, on the other hand, sound like you're doing a fine thing: you're with your girlfriend because you like her.

Just to be clear that no one is making anti-miscegenation arguments here.

Nitsuh, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

So Nitsuh why is the choice of a sexual partner seen as a function of personality criteria (eg introvert / extravert) acceptable whereas the choice of a sexual partner seen as a function of cultural criteria (eg asian / european) unacceptable? And is there really no overlap between culture and personality?

In other words, surely it's no more or less culpable to say 'I always go for introverts' than to say 'I tend to get on well with Asian dates'?

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

*sigh* *sigh* *sigh* Momus do certain personality traits ALWAYS go along with certain racial backgrounds? you are just being deliberately thick. now you are going to make a joke at me and pretend that i haven't pointed this out. go on, then.

katie, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

No, Katie, but there is an overlap. My point builds on something Nitsuh himself said: that there is no such thing as a neutral race. People dating within their own race are making a choice too, a choice which may seem 'invisible' to them, but which is happening nonetheless. Nick Dastoor's confessed uneasiness a few posts ago with the fact that he never found women of other ethnicities than his own attractive was admirably honest. It's all very well to say 'It's all about personality, never mind someone's race...' But what if you extend the argument and say 'Never mind gender, it's all about personality'? Does that mean a gay person has to go straight if he meets the right 'personality' in a woman? Are you denying him the right to make a gender- based preference based on stereotypes -- and even personally-observed generalisations -- of maleness?

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't have to formulate a sensible answer right now, so I will sit back and hope that Nitsuh does.

Dan Perry, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't have TIME to formulate a sensible answer right now, so I will sit back and hope that Nitsuh does.

Who wants to help me invent a device that beams words direclty from your brain onto a computer screen?

Dan Perry, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i'm not denying anyone anything, and i don't see how you could possibly have inferred this from my post. sure, if an up-until-now gay man finds a woman attractive he has a perfectly good right to do so. but i think you're just tacking on the whole gender thing to be obstructive - it's completely irrelvant as far as i can see. or at least the subject of a whole other thread (which i'm not going to start). to answer a point you made on another thread, if a white man fancies exclusively asian women, that does not make him similar to a homosexual. if a white man fancies exclusively asian men, then yes he is similar to a homosexual.

up until i met my boyfriend i had never been attracted to an asian man before (note for what it's worth that for me, "asian" means indian/pakistani/bangladeshi rather than japanese) but i was attracted to him because of his personality - and, godammit, his cuteness. but cuteness is nothing without personality. i did not deny myself the right to be attracted to people outside my own race, it just had never happened before. should i be attracted to a woman, i might feel a little confused but i still would not deny myself that right. OR anyone else. if you are saying that *only* japanese girls have the kind of personality that attracts you then, um, you're going to have difficulty explaining that, as i think we've seen.

katie, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Surely the ICA contains a large proportion of OLD MENG too though Momus? I admit I've only been in there sporadically over the past couple of months but Japanese Art Student Population haven't taken over. Not at all! The crowd is pretty much like many other art galleries (if slightly more wanky).

Sarah, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

cuteness is nothing without personality

I wouldn't say it's nothing...

Sean, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

i like Sean!

katie, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

but, uh, not in that way as then according to Momus's arguments i would clearly be half Japanese, like Jad Fair, and then where would i be?

katie, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Katie, I do think my particular affinity with the Japanese is on a par with something like homosexuality, but it might be the homosexuality of Andre Gide, who only discovered he was gay quite late in life. But I think, as with a gay man, it's a choice other people should accept as valid.

I think what makes people uneasier about racial preference than they are with gender preference is that race is generally a hot button issue, and that love is supposed to be personal, not cultural. But that may just be one of the stereotypes of love, derived from Romanticism. Read Jane Austen and you'll find that money is the main determinant of mate choice in early 19th century England. 'Mr Rochester has 5000 pounds a year...'

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Who wants to help me invent a device that beams words direclty from your brain onto a computer screen?

I rather liked the petulance of your first answer, though.

And of course Sean is right. ;-) But I definitely prefer the two in combination. :-)

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Re: Japanese women and football.

When Hidetoshi Nakata moved to Perugia huge numbers of japanese women (and men) came to Perugia to see him play. SImilarly David Beckham and Michael Owen (and others) are big in Japan, (just like Momus an Shampoo)

Ed, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Katie, I do think my particular affinity with the Japanese is on a par with something like homosexuality, but it might be the homosexuality of Andre Gide, who only discovered he was gay quite late in life. But I think, as with a gay man, it's a choice other people should accept as valid.

Wow. Wow. Wow. This isn't a good, awed wow.

Momus, the problem is this, which you seem to not want to understand - your comments about Japanese women both in this thread and others imply that you look at Japanese women as one, big homogenous interchangeable stereotype. I don't think anyone here thinks that the theory behind interracial dating or even exclusively dating one race is necessarily wrong - people are all attracted to different physical characteristics - but it's the consistent personality characteristics you keep plastering upon Japanese girls that are bordering on the weird. They're not Saigon prostitutes, they're individual people who are not all or even mostly sweet and innocent and delicate and flowery and twee. You might and most likely probably do understand this, but you don't convey that at all through your various postings.

Didn't we have this argument, all of us, after the AICON debacle with Nadia Jee? Everyone wrote in assuming she was twee and stereotypical- Asian-college girl and overly fashion concious vaguely shallow, men men men, etc, so on and so forth, which really bothered me.

Are there cultural standard differences that will alter personality? Yes. Are these overbearing over all other personality shapers? No. And, more importantly, very similar cultural standards towards women apply in most countries anyhow, so I don't understand the fixation with claiming the Japanese are all little stereotypes.

Momus, please note this isn't an attack on you because you get overwhelmingly defensive (hello, we all know that the donkey/car things were jokes, we were joshing on you too), it's just a general comment. It'd be nice if you could explain better than "Japanese girls are all like this", because they AREN'T.

I think the thing with this whole situation is that Momus is attracted to Japanese women physically, and has happened to have attracted a certain personality type. Because you aren't overly venturing out beyond "Japanese women" you have perhaps decided these personality traits in your specific date choices are all universal. Possible? Not possible? I really don't understand your view point I'm afraid.

Ally, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll update you when I go there next month, but I was in Tokyo four months last year without seeing a single public representation of Beckham or Owen. No Bikkle endorsements, no duets with Morning Musume, nada. Of course the World Cup is coming, but plans are being made to ferry fans to and from matches along high security corridors so the rest of us can get along with our miscegenation in peace.

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Read Jane Austen and you'll find that money is the main determinant of mate choice in early 19th century England. 'Mr Rochester has 5000 pounds a year...'

It still is.

Kerry, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

:-(

N., Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ally, I said personality and race overlap, not that they are synonymous. On that we're agreed.

I couldn't possibly outline the whole of Japanese culture in words. I'm on a learning curve about it myself. All I know is that I want to know more. Yes, I said I find Japanese people 'sweeter' (and added that I'd like men to be sweeter too). But I've also told you that Japanese women like Chinese triad movies. I once annoyed you by posting a photo of a Japanese girl wearing a T shirt saying 'Fancy a fuck?' It was someone just waiting for a train at Ebisu station. Sweet does not necessarily exclude feisty.

Momus is attracted to Japanese women physically, and has happened to have attracted a certain personality type.

It's not just physical. Nitsuh saw me as trying to date the whole culture, which is the opposite point of view. Yes, I may have attracted a certain personality type. But I know from just walking around Tokyo that it is a place where my values are much more widespread than they are in the west. In Tokyo, for instance, there are many places that feel like the ICA (or the DIA, for a NYC parallel).

This thread started off with people laughing at a tall, chiselly-cheekboned character called the Sexterminator, who carried roses, wore a white scarf and dated Asian women. Sounds remarkably like the kind of Wildean stereotypes people used to mock back in the day when it was permissible to be homophobic.

In both cases, it's a rather refined person you're laughing at, someone who finds solace from 'brutalism' in either manlove or the orient (and is it an accident that orientalism was fashionable at the same time Wilde was comparing Alfred Douglas to flowers and other suggestively tipped plants?). Such characters genuinely do find more refinement in their chosen love objects, but you can't put their 'stereotypes' of attractiveness and refinement into words. We know it when we see it, that's all.

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I was in Tokyo four months last year without seeing a single public representation of Beckham or Owen.

Maybe this was because you had your head stuck too far up your own arse?

actually a big momus fan but just couldn't resist it, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Nick, stop characterising me as Ms Judge when I'm just offering criticism. Certainly you're intelligent enough to know the difference (I don't pass sentence, duh). You may not like my opinions when I'm disagreeing with yours but poisonous they are not. I will happily back you up when I believe you are in the right. If, in social situations, the girls you were with seemed intimidated by you or the setting, my saying so is not some unpardonable offence. Without going into details as to why, I do rather think you have Entitlement Issues where women are concerned and maybe you should take a good, hard look at what you expect from Japanese (and other) women and what they are entitled to expect from you in return.

And it's pretentious to say you live in Japan half the year. Not yet you don't.

suzy, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh, is that really the time? Good lord...

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

M, the Sexecutioner's heart carries its own payload of tender emotions. No doubt. We all do. Yes, our laughter was partially out of envy - WE wanted to be the rich English boy with high cheekbones and a different rose for each day of the week, turning the Asian girls on to Ecstasy, being "famous" on campus. But now I'm glad I'm not him. He was Dorian Gray; his tender emotions becoming knotted into convention, repeating the same template again and again. To work out what kink? To massage what ache? He probably had a fine time. But give me "brutalism" over that any day!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I wouldn't want some dude running after me with a white scarf and roses, that's for sure. I would feel as if he were trying to fit me into some fantasy scenario. There's no regard here for the people who are being 'orientalized'. And don't get me started on the nineteenth century. Next we'll be championing Paul Gauguin.

Kerry, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

....and what really squicks me about the whole thing is this exaltation of 'refinement' and its association with Asians by white people. In the U.S. at least, ideas about delicacy and refinement are racially loaded (and loaded WRT class as well).

Kerry, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Dorian Gray is actually a very moral work based on Au Rebours by Huysmans. And Wilde's take on this became Dorian Gray. It's like watching karma have a direct effect on a person, also a study of how compartmentalising your life can lead to ruin - as Wilde was slowly discovering (although society of the time gave him no choice and his critics were illiterate: I give you 'somdomite').

It's true that Orientalism was a big feature of Wilde's time and scene, but you have a choice. You can attribute this to Limehouse opium dens or you can attribute it to the 'seepage' of post-Perry Japanese culture into the (cough) West. Both are probably accurate. What I find odd is that nobody has mentioned that the East has carried substantial cultural baggage for the West since the ancient Greeks. Which means we may have 3000 years of work to do on ourselves to redress the balance. Or less, if we are clever.

suzy, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I was actually going to leave this one alone, Dan, as it becomes pretty useless to argue with Momus once he's gone intentionally cloddish -- not to mention his slight narcissism in making this thread an argument about his inclinations rather than the question as it was posed. But since you've summoned me, I may as well point out that nothing Momus has said actually defends the premise of the question or even his own behavior, really.

First, Momus: ethnicity and behaviour overlap but do not constitute one another, which is what makes this "exclusive" focus on ethnicity so irksome to me -- it blinds one to the very real possibility that there are Scottish or Nigerian or Honduran women who actually have more in common with these archtypical cultural traits than many Japanese women might. For proof of this, Momus, look no further than your own damned self. You claim that Japanese culture reflects your values more than any other, but you are not Japanese. A Japanese woman who felt that same way about Scottish culture would be ill-served by being attracted to you. Likewise, a Japanese woman who shared your enthusiasm for Japanese culture -- and then "exclusively" wrote you off in favor of a diet of solely Japanese boys -- would be similarly ill-served. A Scottish woman who also feels this affinity should be within your sights; a Nigerian woman raised in Osaka could quite possible be exactly what you seek; a fifth-generation British Japanese woman should provide you with nothing. A woman so intriguied by Ethiopian culture that she "exclusively" pursued Ethiopian men would in fact be making a huge mistake by talking to me: I have near-zero relation to that culture, in direct opposition to the thousands of Armenians and Italians in Addis Abeba who have every possible non-genetic relation to it.

This is why I was basically being nice to you when I said that you wanted to date a culture. I will have very little problem with you if you just admit that ethnicity has nothing to do with the argument you're making -- you're arguing that there are certain traits which happen to be prevalent in Japanese culture that you find attractive. And remember, Momus: the thread title says "exclusively." It does not say "incline toward" or "are interested in the culture of." And it does not say "let's focus on the individual case of Momus and generalize to pretend that he is emblematic of this entire phenomenon."

Your analogies only get sillier, as well. Are you now such a relativist that you're supporting Victorian gender roles? You now believe a marriage contract based on economic dependency is such a wonderful thing that it's beyond criticism? And your insistence on introducing homosexuality into the equation seems like a deliberate attempt at mystification, a diversion of the argument into trying to parse out the psychology of queer sexuality. I can't claim to have intimate experience of this knowledge, but I remain confident that Japanese women do not have different bits than other women, so the analogy fails sexually. Emotionally, behaviorally -- well, bringing this down to an argument over whether ethnicity ties to behavior more than sex does seems an unproductive path to take, but I'm also pretty firm in my belief that gender trumps. Now we can turn the camera to me: I could well have grown up in the U.S. or Ethiopia, but I'd still have been raised within what is a pretty worldwide gender culture. One cannot say that about culture at large.

I'd submit also that most people do not hugely appreciate being desired based on genetic happenstances that they don't feel have very much to do with their individual identity -- and on the flip side, most of us do not find it entirely normal to see someone whose dating patterns rigidly skew to very particular types. When one meets a man who exclusively dates, say, readheads, one tends to find that inclination at least slightly disagreeable -- one wonders, at least, if this person's priorities are entirely honorable. Similarly, one imagines a lot of redheads who wish the guy would quit fixating on the hair and like them for something they actually chose to do.

Nitsuh, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Sarah on the ICA: The crowd is pretty much like many other art galleries (if slightly more wanky).

Container Drivers on me failing to find Becks & Owen plastered all over Japan: Maybe this was because you had your head stuck too far up your own arse?

Far be it from me to suggest that these statements make you stereotypical British people, but they are statements that you make almost reflexively, and they are statements heard only in Britain. There would not be, for a Japanese, that direct and easy thought-link from 'arty' to 'wanky', and there would not be the presupposition that someone who failed to notice British footballers would have his head any more or less 'up his arse' than anyone who noticed nothing but British footballers, even in countries thousands of miles away.

If Britishness rang my bell, these statements would have me rushing to shag you both stupid. But actually my shag vote goes to my Japanese friends, people who (like me!) cannot see why a cultural institution has to be 'wanky', or why an interest in grown men dribbling a ball has to be 'real', head-out-of-arse stuff.

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(Another way of putting this, Momus, is: being attracted to the ethnicity itself is not the same as being attracted to the prevailing culture. It is being attracted to women who one can use as one's ticket into that prevailing culture -- the same way you, even as you self-identify as Japanese, could be used as a means of exploring the culture of Scotland.)

I wouldn't want some dude running after me with a white scarf and roses, that's for sure.

Damn you, Kerry: they'll never let me return that outfit.

Nitsuh, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

this is slightly off-topic (it's not about momus), but what bothers me is people acting as if they know what goes on in my head or in my relationship by generalizing their own prejudices, hangups and baggage: Saying ALL white people think x about Asians and thus are incapable of real meaningful intimacy with an Asian person could very well = I think (or worry that I think) x about Asians and I feel conflicted and guilty about that, so I wouldn't be capable of real meaningful intimacy with an Asian person and neither would you. (btw, the asian and white roles in this hypothetical face- off can and have been reversed in my experience).

fritz, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Fritz: The people saying that about you are the people making the "yellow fever" jokes -- who I would just as happily punch as anyone who accused my girlfriend of having "jungle fever!" I just want to be clear that you don't actually fit into the category you started the thread by describing -- you don't "exclusively," dogmatically, programmatically seek out east Asian women. Which, you know, hurrah! Nevertheless, there are people out there who are unhealthily programmatic about it, and a lot of those people seem to be that way based on very specific stereotypes. From what you've said, you have no danger of having anything to do with those people.

Nitsuh, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

All Momus is practising is demographic targetting - as a market researcher I can surely only approve.

Tom, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

that's confusingly worded - what I'm trying to say is: don't lay your hangups on me, maaaaan. recognize your own prejudices before you assume that i share them. etc. etc. bunch of hippyshit, i guess.

fritz, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

You claim that Japanese culture reflects your values more than any other, but you are not Japanese.

You touch a very interesting paradox here, the 'unspoiled tourist paradise' syndrome. Tourists always want a place where they won't find people like themselves. (The more adventurous tourists do, anyway.) I don't want to be a member of the club (Britain) that will have me as a member. I cannot become Japanese, and if I miscegenate with a Japanese person I will dilute Japan's difference, making it less the kind of place I want to escape to.

My openness to other cultures depends, to some extent, on their closure to me. To be worth escaping to, they must incarnate values which are truly different and unique. This is a problem for all global migrants, though. The Chinese here in Chinatown don't want the whole population of China to join them in the US, because then they will basically be back in China. They want to be an especially-privileged minority here, competing for work with Americans, not other Chinese, sending dollars home.

A Japanese woman who felt that same way about Scottish culture would be ill- served by being attracted to you.

I can -- and do -- incarnate 'the other' quite happily. In fact, that's one of the pleasures of tourism, talking to the people you meet about life 'back home'. Becoming an 'ambassador'. When I went to Paris, my french friends told me I dressed and spoke like a British person. I didn't mind. When I was married to a Bangladeshi woman, I found myself embracing the British middle class values I had previously rejected and rebelled against -- she changed my mind about my own culture.

I don't, in other words, think we can ever escape our racial and cultural roots (they're all tangled up with each other), but we can have fun recontextualising them. It's very educational.

I will have very little problem with you if you just admit that ethnicity has nothing to do with the argument you're making -- you're arguing that there are certain traits which happen to be prevalent in Japanese culture that you find attractive.

Maybe one day ethnicity -- thanks to global migrants and miscegenation -- will have nothing to do with cultural attractions. But we have not yet reached that day, and it's silly to pretend we have.

And remember, Momus: the thread title says "exclusively." It does not say "incline toward" or "are interested in the culture of."

It says 'exclusively date'. X exclusively dates Asian women because he 'inclines towards' and is 'interested in their culture', as well as for a host of other reasons, no doubt. The 'exclusively' is just about a behaviour pattern he has chosen to adopt, and which I still maintain you should not criticize for the same reasons it's wrong to criticize a man for exclusively dating other men.

I can't believe people have such problems with analogies. Can't I reference Wilde without endorsing the whole Victorian period? Can't I reference Austen simply to show that there are many other criteria in date selection than this shibboleth of 'personality'? most of us do not find it entirely normal to see someone whose dating patterns rigidly skew to very particular types.

This is normative, Nitsuh. You cannot make categories like race visible (as you did saying it made you angry when white European males took their own race for granted) then deny the right of people to date along those lines. Remember also that here race overlaps culture, language, cuisine, attitudes to art and football and a whole bunch of other things.

Here's another analogy for you to misunderstand and mock: I choose to run the Mac OS on my computer. It's difficult (though not impossible) to run a non-Apple OS on an Apple computer. At the moment, it's pretty much a given that if I choose the physical 'body' of an Apple computer, I am also choosing Apple software. One day, I am sure, all systems will run on all computers. But that day has not yet come.

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Here's another analogy for you to misunderstand and mock: I choose to run the Mac OS on my computer. It's difficult (though not impossible) to run a non-Apple OS on an Apple computer. At the moment, it's pretty much a given that if I choose the physical 'body' of an Apple computer, I am also choosing Apple software. One day, I am sure, all systems will run on all computers. But that day has not yet come.

The problem with your analogies isn't that people don't understand them; it's that they're AWFUL. Like, awe- inspiringly bad. The Volvo one was horrible because Volvos are designed, tested and marketed with safety in mind. The parallel you were drawing was not that Japanese women can also have desirable qualities and liking them for those qualities isn't a bad thing, but that Japanese women are produced to a specification of pleasure and that there isn't anything wrong with partaking of said pleasures, since that's what they're there for. The donkey one was horrible because you likened having sex with a non-Japanese woman to having sex with a donkey. The computer one was horrible because it's based on a faulty premise; it isn't at all a given that you're choosing a particular operating system because you've picked a particular chassis.

Dan Perry, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I have decided that I hate my immediate previous post.

Dan Perry, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

ACTUALLY WITH SOFT WINDOWS YOU CAN EMULATE WINDOWS ON A MAC. BUT YOU CAN NEVER EMULATE THE FEEL OF IBM LEATHER MOUSE PADS

Mike Hanle y, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Here's another analogy for you to misunderstand and mock: I choose to run the Mac OS on my computer. It's difficult (though not impossible) to run a non-Apple OS on an Apple computer. At the moment, it's pretty much a given that if I choose the physical 'body' of an Apple computer, I am also choosing Apple software. One day, I am sure, all systems will run on all computers. But that day has not yet come.

Let's run with the computer analogy, though, because it clarifies my problem here: what Momus claims to be looking for here is the operating system, not the hardware. The central argument I have advanced throughout the entire latter portion of this thread is that the operating system, and not the hardware, is the central concern, and that any programmatic approach limited solely to one type of genetic hardware -- especially for those of us who live primarily in Western metropoles, where the ethnicity-culture overlap is way muddied -- is just chasing after the leash instead of the dog, and in plenty of cases the leash starts to seem more important than the dog, and in plenty of cases you get the very real sense that someone's just looking for the leash itself.

Which is Momus? I see no reason not to take his word that he's actually working demographics. So huzzah in this instance. But his type isn't any more universal than the other, less agreeable one.

Nitsuh, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

It seems to me, Nitsuh, that you are peculiarly alienated from your hardware. Why would it be so bad if someone liked you for both your OS and your hardware (not to mention that excellent novel tucked away in your file hierarchy)?

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The fear, Momus, is that the hardware leads people to wildly erroneous and offensive assumptions about the software. Nitsuh's obviously gone through this, I've gone through it, and I wager we aren't the only ones.

Dan Perry, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I take your point. So you go through a phase of trying, with rhetoric, to make people delink, in their minds, hardware and OS. This is good public speech, for a good cause. But after you've done that for a while, it becomes, more and more, a PC lie (PC, geddit?), because, although perhaps we should, we don't yet live in a world where hardware and OS are completely separate things.

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Like Dan says: the difference, Momus, is that my hardware isn't me. The shape of my nose and the color of my skin are not things that I have chosen or achieved as a person. My ethnicity does not constitute the primary, exclusively-important element of what I, as a person, consider myself to be. If you want another word-substitution exercise, just plug "big-breasted" into the preceding and imagine a big-breasted woman quite justifiably speaking it: "Quit fixating on the tits and look at the person." All we're doing is juggling the extent to which ethnicity informs identity, and the point at which focusing on the former becomes problematic -- but I see no argument, Momus, that says it can't or doesn't become problematic, and more often than I'd like.

You're right to touch upon this difference-erasing being much more important within Western diasporas, where the differences themselves are so fluid as to be largely meaningless. And you're right to return to my comment about perceptions of one race as "neutral." We agree on that point, but then we completely diverge: you decide to consider all races not-neutral, whereas I'd prefer to consider all races neutral, and make whatever distinctions we're going to make based on culture and then whenever possible on individual traits.

I imagine an alien descending from space and saying unto me: "Oh, wow, a human! I absolutely love humans ... please accompany me to my space-lounge."

And I imagine myself having the same reaction that I imagine billions of humans across the world would have. Most of us want to be loved for something that is uniquely ours, an identity that we have chosen and have cultivated and are proud of -- not for some massive category we happen to belong to. Those massive categories may well have a lot to do with the identities we construct, in ways that are both conscious and unconscious. But we should be mindful of running so far up the pole that it's the broad category we're fixated on.

I don't pretend to know at exactly what point the priorities skew. I don't pretend to be the final word on at what point having a generalized understanding of a culture cedes to plain stereotyping. But they both do, demonstrably, and while I'm not saying that they have or will for anyone on this thread, I do think we should be aware that it happens and it is not a development any of us should consider very positive.

Nitsuh, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Another way of putting this is to remove race from the picture entirely: what I am saying is that amorous relationships strike me as a lot more ideal when the individuals' conceptions of one another match those individuals' conceptions of themselves. I could not deal with someone for whom 90% of my identity was "he is Ethiopian," and I doubt you could deal with someone for whom 90% of your identity was "he is Scottish." These may be important things, but they are not everything.

This is the sort of unhealthy thing I started this thread complaining about, and it's why I raised the idea of Europeans often considering themselves race-neutral: they see race as 0% of their identity, and thus see it as 90% of everyone else's. And it's that disequilibrium* that causes bad-type "interchangeable" fetishizing, which is all I'm getting mad at here.

* (A disequilibrium which exists just as much among non-Europeans; I discovered last year that Ethiopia is collectively disturbed and mystified by east Asians, meaning there's surely some guy in Addis who's just wrongheadedly crazy for Chinese women.)

Nitsuh, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I agree with many of your points here. I think the question that remains is this: does the race play of two people from races with a largely untraumatic history (eg Britain and Japan) actually threaten the race work you feel needs to be done between people from races with a traumatic history (eg black and white Americans)? Is their relationship, where racial difference can be something to be enjoyed and celebrated, leading you backwards in your struggle to have race taken off the dating agenda, or forwards towards a happier time when race could be something, for you, to be celebrated as part of flirtation and dating?

Are you like a feminist on holiday who angrily slaps a 'this degrades women' sticker on a billboard in Kyoto?

Momus, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

as i am at home using a mac OS0.001, this thread now takes so long to download that it glitches out 4 times in 5, so i'm not going to bother coming back for a bit: can i just say two things?

1: as he who co-collated, edited, subbed and proofed the ICA booklet FIFTY YEARS OF THE FUTURE: A CHRONICLE OF THE INSTITUTE OF THE CONTEMPORARY ARTS 1947-97, I think the ica is EVERY BIT AS BRITISH as foopball, molesworth, crumpets, ant&dec, tompaulin and sarah's half-serious disdain
2: Wilde's actual love object was all-but illiterate also (tho admittedly a looker); and the prostitutes he liked to watch fucking were cute cockney street-louts, ie more beckham than not

3: if you're NOT CAREFUL i shall dip into the fund of knowledge i haf amassed in my DAYJOB and give you a LECTURE on Christopher Dresser's introduction of japonisme into 19th century Brit aestheticism, from porcelain glaze to gilbert and sullivan: "Three little maids from school are we!! Pashing on Momus at present we be!!"

mark s, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Like Dan says: the difference, Momus, is that my hardware isn't me. The shape of my nose and the color of my skin are not things that I have chosen or achieved as a person. My ethnicity does not constitute the primary, exclusively-important element of what I, as a person, consider myself to be.

But wouldn't you say that your physical body is part of who you are as a person? (I don't think that acknowledging that need be tantamount to branding you as an avatar of your cultural or ethnic heritage. We're not disembodied minds, after all -- can't it be said that the self is a synthesis of body and mind, whether or not one's body is a product of choices and accomplishments?)

I have a friend who's consistently attracted to ethnically Asian women, but as far as I know, he hasn't dated anyone who was an Asian immigrant -- i.e. his partners are culturally American / Asian-American, and his attraction is one based on their physical features, which he consistently finds appealing. I don't think that his preference for Asian features constitutes a fixation upon those features, it's just a preference.

The idea that our attractions should be independent of people's physical features is one to which I can't say I subscribe -- no more than I subscribe to the idea that attractions should be solely based on physical appearance: I would think it ought to be a synthesis of the two. In that light, couldn't a woman who (for instance) acknowledged a preference for African physical features simply have a physical type she likes, rather than buying into [insert stereotype here]? I just don't see it as objectionable, or dehumanizing/demeaning, to have that be a part of your attraction, so long as it's not the sole or primary element.

Also, I think this thread is a bit plagued by false binaries. There is a vast middle ground between (a) assuming that a person from a given culture conforms to a stereotype associated with their particular culture, and (b) maintaining that culture and ethnicity should not and do not have any bearing on who a person is or how they act. I think that immoderate language tends to obscure this middle ground, in that if you say that Japanese people "are" such-and-such, you'll run into a lot more hostility than if you say that, in your experience, you find that many Japanese people tend to have/be [fill in the blank]. But I think even the most cursory acquaintance with different cultures will find common traits that are shared by members of the same culture -- not by any means without exception, but often enough to be more than significant -- and I don't think that to be aware of those traits, and to acknowledge them, puts every member of that culture in a little box from which they can't escape. Certainly, many peoples' fantasies are informed by these awarenesses, and influences their romantic life, but does that always have to be a negative, destructive thing? I still hold that a person's attraction can be informed by the other's heritage, without being governed by it or having it constitute exoticism or fetishizing. And if the real problem is turning people into things -- wanting them to fulfill a fantasy or play a role, rather than desiring a relationship with an autonomous equal -- then race isn't really the issue, and the whole question can be addressed under a different bannerhead.

, Thursday, 31 January 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I like what Momus said about being the "other" person, and I like how he came forward with the way, when faced with someone who saw him as alien in some regard, he found parts of himself that he thought he'd left behind. I find this too, in my life. (though I, and you, Momus, are not exactly a capital-O Other)

Tracer Hand, Friday, 1 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm betting Momus is not attracted to a single Japanese woman who plays for the Japanese Women's Rugby Union team. Neither their hardware NOR their operating system (what a *LOVELY* metaphor).

toraneko, Friday, 1 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Phil: I actually entirely agree with you. If you look upthread, I've said several times that inclinations toward physical types are pretty hard to psychoanalyze as good or bad, moral or immoral. And I completely agree w/r/t false binaries, which is my whole point here: that while plenty of people fall toward the "healthy" end of the race- attraction spectrum, there's also a murky middle ground and an unhealthy other end. We all have physical leanings and cultural attractions: I just think we need to be cognizant of them lest they lead us toward the murkier areas. There are people like Momus, who basically likes and would like to attach himself to Japanese culture - - and then there is some old lout in Birmingham picking out a Laotian mail-order bride. Looking upthread, I think Momus and I basically agree on this, and are essentially just stressing opposite sides of the equation.

Nitsuh, Friday, 1 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Just out of curiousity, Momus, if you met a Japanese woman who didn't fit into your stereotype of what "all of them" are like, would you then be dissapointed because they are "not Japanese enough" for you? Would you even say that they aren't Japanese enough?

When people start ascribing personality characteristics to people based on their race/culture, and say all of them are like "This" it might put pressure on some of those people who may not have those traits to somehow live up to this "standard" of what consititues being "truly" Japanese/Indian/Scottish, whatever. I think this is part of how the whole "whitewashed", "race traitor" thing comes about.
I think "inter-racial" dating is great, but i think it's a bit creepy if someone is only dating the other because they have preconceived notions about how this person should behave/think/feel based on stereotypes on that person's race or culture, and then feel let down or betrayed because their expectations were not met.

blackeyeddaisy, Friday, 1 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Just out of curiousity, Momus, if you met a Japanese woman who didn't fit into your stereotype of what "all of them" are like, would you then be dissapointed because they are "not Japanese enough" for you? Would you even say that they aren't Japanese enough?

Two points. Japanese people are all more Japanese than I am, even the least Japanese of them. And the decision to date only Japanese is a fairly arbitrary one. Once made, it doesn't prevent me from valuing the quirks and idiosyncracies of individuals. In fact, since I tend to meet Japanese who are studying or working abroad, you could say that they're quite atypical. Even the Japanese artists I've worked with have been signed to the 'International' roster of Japanese record labels, as if they were aliens in their own land. I get on best with non-conformists, people who question their own culture. But even the most radical non-conformist is likely to reflect her own culture as much as she rebels against it.

I like people who are on the way to becoming 'world citizens', but the flavour of proto-world citizen travelling away from Japan is very different than the flavour of proto-world citizen travelling away from Iran. You cannot totally separate personality from national / racial culture, however much you may wish to transcend your roots. We are all from some racial group, national group, linguistic group. These origins shape us, though we might wish they didn't.

i think it's a bit creepy if someone is only dating the other because they have preconceived notions about how this person should behave/think/feel based on stereotypes on that person's race or culture, and then feel let down or betrayed because their expectations were not met.

One thing we've established is that this is not the question as posed at the top of the thread. It does not say 'White men who date Asian women exclusively because of their race'. Nobody is defending that. It would be pretty boring to date only a race, if such an abstraction were even possible. It says 'White men who exclusively date Asian women', without specifying why they have made this choice. It's usually, as in my case, a whole combination of factors -- personal, aesthetic, cultural, etc. It's no more 'creepy' than exclusively dating your own race.

Momus, Friday, 1 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Momus, it was unclear to me until now that you actually had made a conscious choice to date Asian (specifically Japanese?) women exclusively. (I may be misreading your comments above; please correct me if I am.) I guess I'm curious as to what motivates the exclusivity, and how you arrived at it--that is, at what point non-Asians got ruled out on principle (if that's the case).

Douglas, Friday, 1 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Momus: I'd find someone who only dated their own race [in a situation where this was not simply a percentages question] much creepier than you, if that makes you feel any better.

Sterling Clover, Friday, 1 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

. There's three or four very conservative congressman with asian wives

Mike Hanle y, Friday, 1 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

vietnam/korea vets?

Sterling Clover, Friday, 1 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ooh, Douglas Wolk on the thread! Hello Douglas! You're not going to put this in Spin, are you? Momus, it was unclear to me until now that you actually had made a conscious choice to date Asian (specifically Japanese?) women exclusively. (I may be misreading your comments above; please correct me if I am.) I guess I'm curious as to what motivates the exclusivity, and how you arrived at it--that is, at what point non-Asians got ruled out on principle (if that's the case).

It's not on principle, it's pretty random and personal. It would be boring and solipcistic of me to enumerate my personal list of reasons why, and the list would be open-ended. But it might contain these items:

1. Young Momus (6 years old) meets Japanese Buddhist monk while holidaying on the Scottish island of Colonsay and finds his imagination captured.

2. Young Momus (8 years old) writes his first song, entitled 'I Can See Japan'.

3. Young Momus (16) hears Radio Luxembourg appeal for penfriends for Japanese people and starts correspondence with a girl called Yumiko.

15. Young Momus (24) befriends Edinburgh couple, British man, Asian woman, who model their relationship on John and Yoko. They seem happy.

26. It is the 80s. Much talk of Japan soon becoming world number one economic power. Much wearing of Comme des Garcons and Issey Miyake. Much eating of sushi. First appearance on British streets of 'Japanese immaculates', pretty and wealthy Japanese tourists on shopping sprees.

37. 1989 First Japanese girlfriend. Momus shares with Y*** passionate interest in Mishima and Cocteau.

42. Momus stunned to discover that zero-selling el Records, his label, is actually shifting thousands of records... in Japan.

53. 1992. First trip to Japan. Momus stunned by initial impression of visiting the past and the future simultaneously.

127. 1994-8. Momus, marginal in all other territories, has mainstream chart hits in Japan with Kahimi Karie.

189. 2001. Four months in Tokyo. No cabin fever, no Japan-fatigue. Develops second career as magazine journalist explaining appeal of Japan to America (Index etc) and Japan to Japan (Relax etc).

202. Today. Inexplicable but marked preference for hanging out with, and dating, Japanese people. Plans to live permanently in Japan.

Now, with all that going on, wouldn't I be an odd and perverse fellow to have a thing for Australian surf girls or Tyrolian milkmaids?

Momus, Friday, 1 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

*drifts off in contemplation of alternates* Um, anyway.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 1 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

ah ok, that clears things up a bit. Are you saying that what attracts you to Japanese girls is not really because you think they are all the same, but because you think there is some commonality amoungst them that comes for growing up in Japan and being artsy and having the urge to work/live abroad. And also, the fact that you feel a strong "connection" to Japan, and physcially, just find them more damn attractive! :)

just for the record Momus, I wasn't saying you're creepy - i was thinking of a certain kind of person who goes out with an asian/indian/whatever with a set idea in their heads of what this person should be like because of stereotypes they carry about people of that race, and then slag them off if they don't meet these stereotypes. i think it's pretty clear you aren't one of these people.

as for the physical attraction thing, it's like a "i prefer girls with blonde hair thing". to each their own. unless you just prefer blondes because you think all blondes are ditzy and easy...because then that's just offensive (i think so anyway).

blackeyeddaisy, Friday, 1 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I would be one of those guys if I could get past the existence of stereotypes. I dated a Korean for a few weeks when one conversation just derailed our relationship:

(phone conversation)
ME: so what are you doing?
HER: nothing, having a snack
ME: Oh yeah, whatcha eatin' (duh, dumb endearing quality)
HER: rice
ME: What kind?
HER: What?
ME: What kind of rice? (realizing I just made a mistake)
HER: Have you ever had Korean food?
ME: YEAH, of course... No, wait, actually, I'm not sure that I have, actually...
HER: Koreans eat a lot of rice
ME: Um, I'm sure not all Koreans do. I mean, wouldn't it be kind of stereotypical if I said, "RICE! Of course you're eating rice!" (I said something to this affect, but can't remember exactly)
HER: I like rice.
ME: Me too! Rice pilaf... rice... hey, do you like risotto?
HER: You got something against rice?
ME: No, no, of course not. Leave me alone, gook! (just kidding!)

seriously, I don't remember the specifics, but surprisingly to me, a conversation about rice was what seemed to split us apart. I just felt alienated, as I'm sure did she, and yet I was just being a casual american. It actually didn't occur to me that she'd be eating RICE. That's like eating sprouts or something-- where's the rest of the meal?

But, Asians can be BAYOOTEEEFUL and I think they're hot.

Nude Spock, Friday, 1 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Word for rice in Japanese = gohan Word for food in Japanese = gohan

Momus, Saturday, 2 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Some of the rhetoric in this thread has been positively Meesian in its disingenuousness.

Ron Undernard, Saturday, 2 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

We date Meeses to peeces!!

Kartoon Kat, Saturday, 2 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The categorical straight lines and 'pure' white surfaces of Mies van der Rohe have no place on this thread.

Momus, Saturday, 2 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Seriously, though, Ron, there is a big difference between a lover and a sub-contractor of the Department of Transportation. To apply concepts of institutional impartiality to love relationships would be absurd.Doesn't Laurie Anderson do a piece in 'United States I-IV' about a guy who decides to watch what the government does and then just scale that down to his own life? It's a funny joke, but it would be a nightmarish life. Have you dated a government department recently?

Momus, Saturday, 2 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

As a Reagan lackey, Meese preached the gospel of social and legal "colourblindness" (translation: "preservation of white male hegemony").

Regarding the current discussion -- it's all too depressingly common for cultural discourse in the private sphere to reach the levels of side-of-the-mouth, after-the-fact rationalisation that were characteristic of the Bonzo years.

Ron Undernard, Saturday, 2 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

it's all too depressingly common for cultural discourse in the private sphere to reach the levels of side-of-the-mouth, after-the-fact rationalisation that were characteristic of the Bonzo years.

'Cultural discourse in the private sphere' (why don't we just say 'talking about love'?) is 'reaching the levels' of bilge spouted by Reaganites, and therefore *is* somehow Reaganite? A quantitative comparison of things so qualitatively different, are you sure that's where you want to go? As a metaphor it doesn't explain much, its political slur is spurious (left wing politicians also rationalise after the fact), and, until the day each citizen is accountable to his own personal constitution, it's like comparing chalk and cheese. Persist in your metaphor and you will end up in silly places.

Momus, Saturday, 2 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ahh, now I completely agree with Momus. Love, ideally, revolves around individual traits. Sociology cannot. I was actually wondering when someone would try to puncture these arguments by raising the issue of affirmative action, and here we've drawn up to the gate.

Nitsuh, Saturday, 2 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Calling a line of argument "Reaganite" or "Meesian" (pity "Bushian" doesn't work -- "Bushesque"? "Bushy"?) is like calling your gym teacher a Nazi -- by ritually evoking past evils, even in trivial contexts, you guard against their return. But reminiscence doesn't count as metaphor...

WMWEDAW: Konichiwa!
yamato nadeshiko: That's not how you pronounce it, but hi anyway.
WMWEDAW: You know, you remind me of the last Japanese girl I dated.
yamato nadeshiko: You're an asshole.
WMWEDAW: But it was a metaphor!
yamato nadeshiko: Fuck you.

And another cultural barrier fails to crumble.

Ron Undernard, Sunday, 3 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Calling a line of argument "Reaganite" or "Meesian"... is like calling your gym teacher a Nazi -- by ritually evoking past evils, even in trivial contexts, you guard against their return.

So someone's love life forces you to start 'ritually evoking past evils' in order to guard against their return? You are still drawing, with the word Meesian, a direct parallel between government employment policy and dating preferences, which, as I've said, just takes us to silly places. Maybe this particular exorcism is misguided.

In the dialogue, you make the western male crass and insensitive. By this device you 'demonstrate' that cross-racial dating is somehow a stumbling block to cultural understanding. So what do those two people do, after this unpromising encounter? Do they go back to their own racial gene pools, grumbling something about how foreigners will 'never understand'? Do they wait for the day when we are all alike before dating across the racial divides? Do they consult government policy? Do their two nations, shortly afterwards, go to war?

I don't know what your experiences are, but mine suggest that dating removes the kind of prejudice and ignorance your dialogue (and Nude Spock's) illustrate. Get past that dismal first date, and the second will be better. But only if you're prepared to let yourself be changed by 'the other'.

Momus, Sunday, 3 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

And, important point, it's this process of 'being changed by the other' which leads to the dating preference for Japanese girls, not a perception of the girls' interchangibility.

You will be 'Japanized' by many contacts with Japan and with Japanese people. Far from indicating to the girl that you see her and her people as 'all the same', this will be her guarantee that you see her as an individual, as another Japanese person would. The closer we get to a subject, the more complex and differentiated it becomes. All the more reason to go on to the second date, and the third.

Momus, Sunday, 3 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(I feel compelled, though, for some reason, to point out how much Momus has defended his argument by changing the question that was asked. By focusing on Japanese culture, he's essentially shifted the spotlight away from the sort some of us are criticizing, who failure to appreciate culture is what makes their fetishistic attractions to Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese, and Thai women all the same to them. He's defended a behavior in principle that's all too often disagreeable in practice, as he agrees somewhere upthread. What I'm not clear on is exactly how forgiving he's being of its disagreeable side -- as part of a larger and more likeable trend. I will not make a joke about Communism.)

Nitsuh, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(What happens when an arts institute in human form starts dating government departments exclusively, anyway? Does it go on to have little operating systems with National Parks? Or does it end badly when Transportation is seduced by Zeus in the form of an introverted libertarian donkey?)

Douglas, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

What happens when an arts institute in human form starts dating government departments exclusively, anyway?

This is the best comment in the thread right here.

Dan Perry, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

People just don't like metaphors, do they? They deny using them, a la Ron, or they run ten together to make them look ridiculous, a la Douglas. Maybe I should stop using them, or just blow them up into outrageous tall tales in their own right the way Lucian did.

On Nitsuh's point, I did make a distinction upthread between 'your dad's fetishism' and 'your fetishism'. I suppose there's a contradiction between this position, which is judgemental, and my point on the Unhealthy Attractions thread that we cannot or should not judge other people's love lives. And I suppose that by associating 'your dad's fetishism' with Vietnam I was linking desire with politics, something I later ridiculed when affirmative action came up.

All I can say to smooth these half-contradictions is that I am thinking about this in real time (and also acting on it in real life) and have welcomed the chance to thrash it out on a thread. I think it's wise to walk very carefully when judging other people's attractions, and I think that the closer we get to equality (which is not the same as identity) between cultures and genders, the less we're going to need to make political judgements of personal relationships.

I do think that people were attacking 'your dad's fetishism' and I was defending 'Lennon / Ono' on this thread, so we may all have been agreeing more than we seemed to be. And I do still think that the metaphor of affirmative action rasied by Ron was silly, though perhaps no sillier than me as 'Empire State human' in the form of the ICA. (At least I admitted it was a metaphor.)

The original question asked whether the dating behaviour of certain people (WMWEDAW) should lead to their being a) shunned for stereotyping, b) praised for transceding cultural determinism or c) given no more though than a leg man. I don't think I redefined the question at all. I was clearly batting for b) all the way -- as, it turned out, was 'Patti Heart' himself.

Momus, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

WHAT ABOUT ASIAN MEN WHO ONLY DATE BLACK WOMEN?

Mike Hanle y, Monday, 4 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

They don't exist.

N., Tuesday, 5 February 2002 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

three months pass...
dood, ile like totally sux0r now!!!

Ron, Friday, 17 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

one month passes...
I remember reading the article by an Asian feminist that you cited. What bothers me about feminists is that they are bitchy even to women. So what if some Asian women want to date white men? Is that such a sin? Feminists hate men and women who want to date men. They are always very, very angry.

Kevin King, Saturday, 13 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Kevin I love you and I want you

maryann, Saturday, 13 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

MARYANN IN SEARCH OF MANG-FLESH!! (oh i cant say mang-flesh it reminds me too much of mangas)

vic, Sunday, 14 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Of course the article was read - the magazine was left lying on my bed.

Troll. Coward.

Dean Air, Friday, 19 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

The worst thing about dating a white guy for me, as an asian woman (who has also dated black men, a latino man, asian men, a middle-eastern man, and multi-racial men thank you) are the assumptions that he, as white guy, must be some sort of fetishist, and I, as Asian woman, must be his compliant toy. White women often project their own fear, anger, and jealousy onto Asian women in the worst way, assuming that Asian women are incapable of thinking or experiencing desire as sexual subjects, not just sexual objects -- and assuming that there can't possibly be anything to our relationship beyond the sex (which in my case does not happen to be the main draw. I just happened to fall in love with a guy who happened to be white.) We couldn't possibly be people with ideas, a sense of humor, a career, interests beyond bed. If we're with a white guy, it's just because he's chosen us. If anyone reads Courtney Weaver's insulting and racist article in Salon.com's archives ("Tiny, flat-chested, and hairless!") you'll see what I'm talking about. This whole discussion makes me tired. Maybe one day Americans will learn to deal with our rich racial mix by living their own lives and not getting their panties knotted up about other people's relationships.

joy s., Sunday, 21 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Thank you for that viewpoint, Joy, I was waiting for it. I would have said so myself, but I felt only half-entitled to because I am half-Asian. I am only half-joking. I eagerly look forward to the demise of these types of debates as the population of mixed-race people, like myself, increases.

felicity, Sunday, 21 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Joy S., indeed, roolz. :-) Hope you hang around and post more!

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 21 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I dunno: after reviewing this thread, I'm beginning to think that a whole lot of people are either completely misreading half of the arguments on it or don't know what "exclusively" means.

nabisco, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

My father exclusively married a white woman.

Spencer Chow, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

No, nitsuh, I think people are not realizing how depersonalizing it is to presume to discuss other people's dating habits based on race classifications.

Spencer, me too.

felicity, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Except the other way round.

felicity, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't know : I think that, as nabisco says, it's more complicated than they're making it out to be. And I think that accusing any group of women of "jealousy" is just the worst sort of sexism because it feeds into all of that divide-and-conquer bullshit. I've known guys who have had a racial or ethnicity fetish, and one of the very first things they offer in their defense is that this-or-that group of women is 'jealous' that he doesn't find their group attractive. What, exactly, do you think they're jealous of? Do tell. It's pretty egotistical to imagine that someone is jealous of you. There's a presumption there that the person who is 'jealous' has nothing to be grateful for or proud about regarding their own ethnicity.

Of course, I smell a rat here. Particularly the sort of rat who likes getting goats.

Dean Air, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

No, nitsuh, I think people are not realizing how depersonalizing it is to presume to discuss other people's dating habits based on race classifications.

But Felicity, you're agreeing with me! The question was: "what do we think of people whose dating habits are based on race classifications" and I all along argued "that's depersonalizing." It's not like anyone injected racialized thinking into the thread: it's the whole topic of the thing, based on that nagging "exclusively" that everyone wants to ignore.

nabisco, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Which is to say: no one is criticizing white men for dating Asian women, and I'm completely baffled as to why everyone keeps thinking that's the case. What's being criticized is exactly the sort of depersonalizing race-based thinking you're criticizing: in this case, white men whose overriding exclusive dating criterion is the infinitely race-based "she is Asian." If the thread had been called "White Men Who Date Asian Women" or even "White Men Who Usually Date Asian Women" I'd have posted nothing more than "So?"

nabisco, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

(Thus "this type of debate" can only end when there are no longer people running around for whom race constitutes a primary defining factor in their dating decisions. Surely you see where I'm coming from with this argument, Felicity: it's not in the least an argument that there's anything wrong with anyone dating anyone, but rather an argument that people whose dating criteria are largely race-based are the ones doing the depersonalizing work.)

nabisco, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I knew that if I waited long enough Nitsuh would write a more coherent version of what I was thinking.

Dan Perry, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Nitsuh, I know you mean well. We do agree on level 1 of this analysis: nobody likes to be treated as a fungible unit in a category, especially when the category is an extremely charged one such as a race classification. So that's settled.

However, there are also several other meta-levels and meta-directions of the discussion that have been raised but not developed that much because we're still making sure we all agree on level 1. The issue is not that people are not reading the thread or understanding the primary argument but that some people (I'll speak for myself here) have been beat over the head with the same argument, in exactly the same form -- using the same hackneyed premises and meta-stereotypes -- for so long that the biases and premises underlying the "good" side of the argument begin to become irritating as well. To put it bluntly, at level 2 of the discussion, people who overly concern themselves with WMWEDAW can at times be almost as annoying as the WMWEDAW themselves, and for similar reasons. Here are some of my theories why.

1. Yes, there are Asian woman fetishes and negative Asian woman stereotypes. But having these types of debates tends to focus attention on a particular East Asian woman stereotype to the exclusion of other stereotypes. People rarely seem to say "He has a thing for Asian girls because they are grasping and cunning and fixated on career achievement" or "He has a thing for Asian girls because they are materialistic and superficial and abnormally acquisitive of Louis Vuitton luxury goods" or "He has a thing for Asian girls, what with those saris and those caste marks and that spicy curry rowr" -- it always seems to be the same quailing, lotus- blossum stereotype that is trotted out for criticism. So the overwhelming consistency of the example stereotype reinforces the overall tendency to make racial generalizations and does more harm than good, notwithstanding the well-meaning intention to denounce people projecting the stereotype onto their date-ees. It's like repeating the racist joke in the memo saying "Mr. X was recently terminated from his job in this company for telling the following inappropriate joke: [racist joke]."

2. Perhaps I am imagining it, but there is an idea that I'm having trouble forming and expressing that goes generally like this: there is either a disproportionate amount of concern about WMWEDAW or that it somehow seems more acceptable for people to dissect the WMWEDAW phenomenon than it would be for people to dissect the phenomenon of of [whatever race][whatever gender]WED[non-Asian female-whatever]. I think the reason I'm having this idea has to do with the stereotype (to which Joy alluded) of Asian women as unable to choose, think or fend for themselves against the rapacious, non-Asian man, as well as exploiting the general Asian "model minority" stereotype of not making trouble, don't rock the boat, etc. I know that people would say they hold the same views with respect to men "preying" on other racial classifications of women, but they DON'T. Perhaps I would feel better if I saw some alternate threads for the other racial fetishes and that everyone contributed their strong viewpoints on those race phenomena as well. Perhaps I wouldn't. Like I said, perhaps I am imagining it.

3. The decision to define a category as [X] (in this case "Asian") and then to keep harping on a person's membership in category [X], even in a well-meaning way, is depersonalizing. For some reason it seems that the continent-of- origin level of classification is the only thing that is troubling. For example, I seem to be getting the idea that there is something equally sinister about (a) a man who dates a 1st-generation Vietnamese woman, a second-generation Korean-American woman, a Laotian refugee, and a Japanese surfer girl (since there seems to have been an unstated premise that on this thread Asian = East Asian) and (b) a man who dates a series of four Cantonese Chinese women named Emily with size-2 feet because in both (a) and (b) the man is ED"A"W. I think it might be interesting to question why this particular classification has been chosen. For example, Korean and Japanese people don't always exactly get along -- why does it make sense to talk about them in the same dating profile? If we want to talk about dating the phenotype, fine, let's talk about that, but the "Asian" label is kind of frustrating.

4. I think you can get on thin ice in general when forming generalizations based on your own, individualized experiences and then projecting the attendant conclusion-theories onto others (<== like there, see?). Nitsuh (and Dan, since you also seem to have something to say), feel free to contribute your own (what? "inter-racial"? -ugh) dating experiences and thoughts, and see where there are differences and commonalities among us. It's easier to see people as individuals that way, which is what I like best about ILE. However, please do not presume that your experience/views on racial calssifications = mine = my parents (I shuddered when I read "in extreme cases marriage" on that January 30 post).

Besides that, I would like to point out that I actually quite like Balthus.

felicity, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I just want to note that "in extreme cases marriage" was a joke pertaining to all types of dating, between whomever: I'm still in a position to view marriage as about as likely as a terminal disease.

That said, I do see your complaints, only I on some level want to dodge them here, insofar as it wasn't me who introduced the topic or even started off trying to frame it in a certain sense -- or even limited it to Asian women, insofar as my first post on this thread was intended to point out how much I dislike the same phenomenon when it's directed at black males. In which situation I'd still take all of your points above and yet still make the same sorts of arguments that I've been making on this thread.

I can see how (1) functions -- e.g. in the case of Fritz's friends making "yellow fever" cracks, most likely jumping to that stereotype in the absence of any evidence to support it, thereby promoting the stereotypes themselves -- but I don't think that's nearly the same thing as pointing out that a great deal of let's say Americans with race-based dating criteria (whether directed at Asian women or black men or Latinos / Latinas or anyone else) really are working off of a dominant stereotype, and even the one that's least realistic, so far as current possible Asian-woman stereotypes go. I don't see how pointing this out in any sense reinforces it, so long as one isn't automatically jumping to the conclusion that that's the case whenever one sees a white man and an Asian woman together. By the same token, I'd be annoyed if anyone looked at me with a white date and immediately assumed that I must have a huge dick and treat her terribly. (The former would be slightly less annoying, but still.)

As for (2), like I said, my first post was to make an equivalent comparison with the races changed and the gender reversed. Also (a) I don't think of myself as terribly concerned with this phenomenon -- to be honest, I don't believe I'd ever given it much thought before this thread -- plus (b) my image in this scenario is actually of a whole lot of Asian women getting constantly bothered by stereotype- seeking white men, and either figuring out that hidden motivation down the line or seeing it straight-off and telling the guy to get lost.

As for (3), that again was my whole argument from above: that a great number of the white men who exclusively date (East) Asian women make absolutely no distinctions between the various bits of that entire section of the continent, which is part of the reason I repeatedly told Momus (whose attraction is a specifically cultural one with Japan) that the segment of the WMWEDAW contingent I was criticizing had little-to-nothing to do with him. In that sense the "frustrating classification" is a creation of a particular and not-insignificant subgroup of the WMWEDAW group -- and you cannot tell me there aren't plenty of guys out there whose "exclusive" attraction to East Asian women extends without distinction from Japan through Thailand.

The reason I've said "I think we all agree" above is that no one is really disputing that there is this "bad" type of stereotype-driven fetishistic race-based dating, and apart from that there are loads upon loads of people having perfectly lovely relationships with people of other races, and also perfectly-fine cultural inclinations or aesthetic whatevers to particular other races (I can't claim to have ever had a relationship that wasn't in the second category). Where the disagreement begins is around (a) what the proportions are of the former to the latter, and (b) how useful or helpful it is to point up the "bad" side of the former. I keep coming back to this thread because I want to make absolutely clear how little I like the idea of people tending to assume that all interracial dating revolves around the fetishes and the stereotypes -- if there's any point of view mentioned in this thread that annoys me most, it's that of those who would make "yellow fever" comments to Fritz for dating an Asian woman (or, like I said, anyone who would make "jungle fever" comments about my girlfriend). And no, I don't think it's helpful to go around being skeptical of people simply for often dating people of a particular other race, which is just a lite version of what I'm complaining about in the previous sentence. The only reason I've taken the stance I have here is the word "exclusively" in the thread title, which points to a guy who programmatically seeks Asian women to date -- despite all of the vast variation in that incredibly huge group. If we consider this in an American sense, or a Western-metropolitan sense, we have to conclude that such a person is either (a) stereotyping to somehow connect Chinese immigrants with fourth-generation Japanese girls, or (b) working with phenotypic aesthetics, which is not ethically reprehensible but still incredibly shallow.

As for how we'd relate this to other genders and races, in the US the main proponents of dating "exclusively" based on race tend to be white racists, don't they? ("You will exclusively date other white people.") And so at root what I'm arguing with here is the idea that in a place like the US race, of all things -- especially in as broad a sense as "Asian" -- should be anything near a primary "exclusive" factor in who a person dates. And that's really all I'm saying: not that we should be overly suspicious of everyone's reasons for dating who they do, not that we should always assume certain stereotypes are always in operation, not that we should create some new stereotype around white men dating Asian women, not that the WMWEDAW phenomenon deserves a lot of negative attention either way. Just that basing dating on race to the point of "exclusion" is dud, dud, dud.

nabisco, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Also perhaps part of the problem is that WMWEDAW do not exist as a visible category, so we are not even discussing people or trends so much as theory: you can't put anyone in that category apart from their saying "yes, I will only date Asian women." If someone said that to you, thereby specifically putting himself in the category being discussed here, wouldn't you think that was a bit dud? Which is all, honestly all, I'm definitely proposing here.

nabisco, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Level 1: Of course I would think it was dud.
Level 2: But I would also find dud anyone who immediately assumed that yellow fever-man was only after me for some submissive personality stereotype, rather than giving me credit for my grasping, superficial, careerism and spicy yellow curries.

p.s. Nitsuh, you owe me a call -- I have free Cubs tickets for the rest of the week. And damn, you can type fast.

felicity, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

And Dean Air -- what are you talking about with your rats and goats? Isn't it the year of the Horse??

felicity, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Ahh, good, I think we're mostly in agreement, then. I was actually just coming back to note that I wholeheartedly take your point that constant attention to these matters only increases the apparent relevance of race to amorous matters, which is why -- contrary to how it may appear on this thread -- I don't go around having these conversations very often.

By the way, I just tried to IM you and then you disappeared. I was going to tell you that I've finally cleaned up around here, including music-organization, so now you can come borrow stuff from me to accompany you through the more studious bits of the next week.

nabisco, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I somehow sense the Felicity/Nitsuh nuptials impending. The Cubs fans need to establish a codependency to assuage their eternal grief, you see.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Asian is a funny word. Below is a list of the countries in Asia. Should women from all these countries be considered Asian? In general usage in Australia, Asian means Mongoloid people and does not include Indians or Pakistanis - whereas in the UK, Asian does include Indians & Pakistanis, although they are Caucasians. The difference between race and nationality/continentiality is interesting. If I'd been born in Japan, or if I emigrated to there, then I could say I was Japanese but would anyone believe me? Would most Japanese people accept me as Japanese? I only use this as an example as I recently read a couple of articles about white and negro people of Japanese nationality and the racism they suffer there - mostly not being considered Japanese and therefore the conclusion that Japanese is more about race than nationality. Anyway, for general interest here is the list of countries in Asia.

Afghanistan
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Bhutan
British Indian Ocean Terr.
Brunei
Burma (Myanmar)
Cambodia
China
º Hong Kong
º Macau
Cyprus
East Timor
India
° Andaman Islands
° Nicobar Islands
° Lakshadweep Isl.
Indonesia
° Bali
° Borneo
° Timor
° Sumatra
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Japan
° Amami O Shima
° Okinawa Gunto
° Sakishima Shoto
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Lebanon
Malaysia
Maldives
Mongolia
Nepal
North Korea
Oman
Pakistan
Philippines
Russian Fed.
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Singapore
Syria
South Korea
Sri Lanka
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Thailand
Turkey
Turkmenistan
U.A.E.
Uzbekistan
Vietnam
Yemen

toraneko, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh yeah, and how about American Indians and Eskimos - are they included in the WMWEDAW if, in fact, we only mean mongoloids?

toraneko, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

actually, in the UK 'Asian' usually just refers to the countries of the Indian sub-continent

michael, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

In the US, "Asian" typically means "I can't tell if you're Japanese, Korean, Chinese, Vietnamese, Filipino, Cambodian, Hmong, or one of those other countries I can never remember."

Dan Perry, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, that's how I use it.

felicity, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

we have to conclude that such a person is either (a) stereotyping to somehow connect Chinese immigrants with fourth-generation Japanese girls, or (b) working with phenotypic aesthetics, which is not ethically reprehensible but still incredibly shallow.

Why is "working with phenotypic aesthetics" incredibly shallow? Isn't that just code for "having physical preferences and acting on them"? A sizeable proportion of the population has a single, physical "ur-type" in their sexual subconscious, one that creates a more consistently powerful response in them than any other. If they know that's what they find most satisfying, I have a hard time thinking ill of them for pursuing it just because their ur-type takes shape along ethnic/racial lines. It may seem silly or narrow of them to focus so single-mindedly on a particular type, but I can't see it as impeachable, particularly if they've explored the alternatives and found them less satisfying. Romantic relationships are, after all, interactions of body and soul, and even the best-intentioned one will founder if it's not predicated on mutual attraction on both fronts. If we acknowledge that it's possible to have phenotypic preferences that aren't predicated on cultural stereotyping, and if we're going to criticize Caucasian men who know the Asian female phenotype is what they want -- or Caucasian women who feel the same way about the African/African-American male phenotype, or vice versa -- then how is that different from criticizing people for exclusively pursuing people with luminous eyes, or small breasts, or hairy chests, or whatever? Why shouldn't people pursue what turns them on the most, assuming they're capable of being turned on in a way that acknowledges their partner's humanity?

in the US the main proponents of dating "exclusively" based on race tend to be white racists, don't they?

I'd be far more inclined to give that mantle to first-generation immigrants. Certainly a very high proportion of people I've known, especially women, whose parents emigrated from China/Japan/Korea/etc. have come under pressure from their parents to exclusively date people from said country. Granted, that's partly a cultural issue, but still -- how is that particularly different from Caucasian families wanting their kids to marry Caucasians? Or African-Americans who want their children to exclusively be involved with African-Americans -- and would rather see them involved with an African immigrant than a Caucasian Jew?

Phil, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

You're right on both counts, Phil, although I'd like to clarify that I don't mean "shallow" as impeachably shallow, or anything of that sort: simply that if one's attraction to a visible phenotypes is so strong that it becomes this exclusionary impulse, that's ... "shallow." Shallow in the same sense that only dating blondes, or ectomorphs, or women with huge breasts would be sort of ... "shallow." I.e. it's not a moral complaint, but it foregrounds these visual (and sometimes tactile) concerns so far over personality that it looks a bit boorish or unseemly (or at worst depersonalizing).

Of course this depends on how successful you are with the opposite sex: I suppose you could be so outrageously desirable and have so many lovely dating options that you can be that way about visual ideals.

nabisco, Wednesday, 24 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)

two months pass...
Critiques of people who date IR seems to be designed to stigmatize IR couples. The message seems to be: If you date outside of the group, we will talk badly about you. What right do you have to critique others for who they date? Stigma, stigma, stigma...

, Saturday, 5 October 2002 15:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I heart this thread so much.

toraneko (toraneko), Saturday, 5 October 2002 16:26 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't know whether i find the idea of ILX as a tabloid or momus *in* a tabloid more unlikely...

I can remember Momus being in a tabloid. A big centre-pages spread in lamentable Scottish paper the Daily Record a few years ago. I can't remember the details exactly, but the story/interview was connected to his marriage (to an asian woman), rather than about music. I found it odd to see Momus in the Daily Record then, when I was only vaguely aware of his work. After reading some of his messages here (on this site, I mean, rather than this thread), I find it odder still.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Sunday, 6 October 2002 14:24 (twenty-two years ago)

russia is asia?

only bits of it....
and many russians would disagree (hoping to ignore siberia as just this...thing, y'know)

and momus goes to colonsay! its a very nice island. did you stay in the hotel momus?

ambrose (ambrose), Sunday, 6 October 2002 16:19 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd submit also that most people do not hugely appreciate being desired based on genetic happenstances that they don't feel have very much to do with their individual identity -- and on the flip side, most of us do not find it entirely normal to see someone whose dating
patterns rigidly skew to very particular types. When one meets a man who exclusively dates, say, readheads, one tends to find that inclination at least slightly disagreeable -- one wonders, at least, if this person's priorities are entirely honorable. Similarly, one imagines a lot of redheads who wish the guy would quit fixating on the hair and like them for something they actually chose to do.

I don't share your feeling that such preferences are "slightly disagreeable." Furthermore, I think I'd be happy if someone was sexually attracted to me based on fairly superficial aspects of my appearance over which I have no real control. I actually think it would be nice to be appreciated on that level. Of course, I admit that after a time, if a relationship developed, I would hope that the person would come around to seeing more of who I am.

I feel a bit defensive on this topic since though I am not attracted rigidly to one type, I do have my types, and over time I will go through certain phases. At one time I was particularly attracted to Asian women (though not nearly as successful in the pursuit as Momus apparently has been), primarily, I think, for aesthetic reasons. (For what it's worth: no, I was definitely not looking for some ultra-submissive geisha fantasy.) Since then, I have become rather taken with Latinas and Russian women and Indians (not the sort of Asian I was particularly attracted to previously). I have a long-standing very strong preference for brown-eyed brunettes.

Honestly, I am made a little uncomfortable by the fact that I have never really been attracted to black women (or at any rate women I perceive as black--as chance would have it, I am currently dating someone who considers herself black, though I didn't see her that way when I met her). (I have to further qualify this by saying that some North African women have been an exception, including Ethiopians. lol.) Is it just a coincidence that the one race whose females don't appeal to me happens to be the one which has traditionally been perceived in the worst light by white Americans? Probably not. At the same time, I don't think that such preferences operate at a level where they can easily be modified. I think my preference in this case is probably shaped by racist or prejudiced currents in my society, but I don't see it as something I really need to correct. Black women can surely get by without me. If it is racism, it is racism on a fairly unconscious level. As I said, I now know that the person I just started to date is black. If I had some sort of conscious racist ideology, I would presumably stop dating her at this point. (Ironically, I have been somewhat worried that she does not fit my brown-eyed, dark-haired preference.)

Rockist Scient, Sunday, 6 October 2002 16:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, I recognize that some people don't like being liked for aspects of their appearance (blonde hair, big breasts, roundish feet, etc.), and I can see how it would get tiresome, but I consider it realistic to accept that there is a large superficial element in sexual attraction. Those superficial preferences are going to limit the pool of potential partners you initially choose from, but that doesn't mean that you can't go on to discover less superficial reasons to like those same people.

Rockist Scientist, Sunday, 6 October 2002 17:01 (twenty-two years ago)

three weeks pass...
ISRAEL IS IN ASIA??!?!?! Dude, my dating pattern this past year makes me a female Momus then!

Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 31 October 2002 03:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Wha...? This old thread keeps on rumbling! Well, here's the lyric of a song on the forthcoming Momus album 'Oskar Tennis Champion' which might -- might -- have been influenced by it.

Scottish Lips

Because I have Scottish lips
You think you can tell me you love me
Because I have Scottish lips
You are listening hard to your glands
Because I have Scottish lips
You are dancing a fling in your knickers
Your love for my Scottish lips
Knows no bounds
It's the love that is known
The love that is known to baboons

Don't love me for my Scottish lips
But my truffles and my baklava
Grilled eggplant, delicious mint salsa
Love me for my cooking!
Don't be stupid, I'm joking
I'm only joking

Get lost if you tell me you love me
When it's all for my Scottish lips
Why don't you tell me you love me for stuff
That's a bit more important than this
Tell me you love me in spirit
Tell me you love me in soul
Or you love me in mind
Even if it's a lie
And when I reply
Look me deep in the eye
Or at least try to look the other way

Just make sure your gaze never slips
Down to my Scottish lips

Momus (Momus), Thursday, 31 October 2002 05:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Of course this thread is still running, it's like the greatest thread ever.

Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 31 October 2002 21:02 (twenty-two years ago)

That first verse is a thing of rare beauty.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 31 October 2002 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Momus i listened to that .wav of your voice from that other thread. I'd push the 'Scottish' thing a bit less if I were you - cf. those Victorian kilts.

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Friday, 1 November 2002 02:35 (twenty-two years ago)

So I missed this thread and just started something similar...anyhoo this thread is a good one. Lot of people who probably haven't been to Japan saying things about Japn tho. Anyway, if you exclusivley date women of one race you are foolishly limiting yourself. But if you admit to an attraction or even a preference for a certain race, what's the big deal? No different than liking cheerleader types or redheads, primarily a physical thing. And if you don't take the physical into account in your partner choices than you are some kind of perv I thinks. Here in philly I see a lot of white/asian couples (all iterations of race and gender), probably because there are lots of college students and chinatown is right in the heart of the city. But I have heard women say that white guys who date asians must have small dicks. I think they are actually jealous because most of the asian girls they see are well-educated and thin. What's wrong with being attracted to a group of people who tend to be be smart and thin? Note to non-asian philly women: lay off the cheesesteaks... ;-)

g (graysonlane), Tuesday, 5 November 2002 20:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Dude, there are tons of heavy Asian women, every time I go to the tea shop on Mott I battle them. Not that there's anything wrong with that, I mean they don't seem to thrilled with battling tall ass white chicks either.

Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 03:09 (twenty-two years ago)

There's some general thing that's often said about fat people being invisible. I reckon fat Asian chicks are the most invisible people of all. So many people seem to think that no such thing exists, despite them being ubiquitous, in Melb anyway.

toraneko (toraneko), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 11:13 (twenty-two years ago)

I guess it just depends where you go. I mean, I see more obese people in 5 minutes in philly than in a month in tokyo. But then, philly used to be america's fattest city i believe. supposedly we have slimmed down here a bit... But I think there are probably less fat people in china town.

g (graysonlane), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 16:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Chow Yun Fat people?

felicity (felicity), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 16:40 (twenty-two years ago)

g, I believe Philadelphia is still one America's fattest (but sadly, not phattest) cities.

(It's starting to catch up to me a little too, but oddly enough I now seem to be more attractive to women than I was a couple years ago when I was 20 lb. lighter.)

RS, Wednesday, 6 November 2002 16:48 (twenty-two years ago)

you are right still fat but not really phat

g (graysonlane), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 23:01 (twenty-two years ago)

eleven months pass...
Revive cos I'm being a dick!!!!

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought about being this kind of dick yesterday.

Carey (Carey), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:04 (twenty-one years ago)

uh-oh.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I like Lucy Liu. She's pretty. Has she been in any movies lately?

mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Heh heh Pash!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:06 (twenty-one years ago)

So Dan, how large are you?

Ricardo (RickyT), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm frickin' HUGE!

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Mine is bigger!!!

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:09 (twenty-one years ago)

So those internet ads always do deliver on their promises!

Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Right, I'm off to phone Nigeria.

Ricardo (RickyT), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)

SATISFY YOUR WOMAN PINDICK

(What is a "woman pindick" [and can we eat it]?)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Don't do it! That's how they got Don Johnson!!

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:12 (twenty-one years ago)

haha i haven't seen a "pind|ck" spam for a while - satisfy your wife, pindick! grow a d|ck like shaq's!! Instead I get some stupid shit that suggests I "increase the volume of your ejaculate" (!!!) WHY THE FUCK WOULd ANYONe WANT #THAT!!!???!!!???!!!???

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Bukkake?

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Cause sometimes you can't hear it over the neighbor's stereo.

Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:15 (twenty-one years ago)

My favorite part of this thread is when the dude calls all non-asians in Philly fat asses

Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Wow, I really went to town on this thread!

felicity (felicity), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:24 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
http://www.audiobooksonline.com/shopsite/media/1558006974.jpg

_, Monday, 10 October 2005 11:14 (nineteen years ago)

sippin' on coke and rum

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Monday, 10 October 2005 11:34 (nineteen years ago)

I'm assuming Inamoto is a Japanese football player? If so, Japanese women will be completely indifferent to him. He will play a bit part in the locker-room scenarios of rice queen jocks. A couple of women in Scunthorpe will wonder if his skin is 'smooth as silk'.
Japanese women fantasize about Japanese pro-wrestlers and Chinese Triad gangsters. The ones I know, anyway. When they're not fantasising about fey yet intellectually macho Scottish singers.

-- Momus (nic...), January 31st, 2002.

what bollocks of generalization, as most people who know real japanese people, as opposed to art sceney japanese, will know. i have a japanese woman friend who is a huge soccer fan (much to my initial surprise, almost horror) to the point where she went to most of Euro 2004 and wrote about the matches for a japanese sports paper. and she's not pretty, demure, cute, sweet, just a nice person

toodly, Monday, 10 October 2005 12:32 (nineteen years ago)


So what's the difference between 'Chinese' and 'Japanese'?

mickey raft (mickeygraft), Monday, 10 October 2005 13:38 (nineteen years ago)

real japanese people, as opposed to art sceney japanese

Rockist!

Momus (Momus), Monday, 10 October 2005 14:00 (nineteen years ago)

japanese are perverts and drunks while chinese are efficient and charming.

Jimmy Mod wants you to tighten the strings on your corset (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Monday, 10 October 2005 14:01 (nineteen years ago)

I am really, really not surprised that book was imported back to Japan.

Laura H. (laurah), Monday, 10 October 2005 18:35 (nineteen years ago)

whenever I see a an (east) asian couple I go awww and cheer inside although most likely that couple is from east asia(i.e not western east asians) so it doesnt really count.

Lovelace (Lovelace), Monday, 10 October 2005 22:43 (nineteen years ago)

My Korean ex calls me YANGPA all the time... weird!

Jonothong Williamsmang (ex machina), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 16:21 (nineteen years ago)

http://wizardishungry.com/no/king-gygax.png

Jonothong Williamsmang (ex machina), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 16:41 (nineteen years ago)

Hardcore kids wear girl pants? ?

Dickset! Dickset! Disckset! (jaxon), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 16:49 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

i know its not the post title and i might have missed out a whole load of comments (this thread is very very long - clearly WMWDAW is a burning topic in the hearts of many) but this post doesnt have enough discussion about what the asian girls in these relationships think about all this.

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 11:43 (eighteen years ago)

Are they allowed opinions?

Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 11:47 (eighteen years ago)

"this post doesnt have enough discussion about what the asian girls in these relationships think about all this"

true

this thread, on the other hand, could be a whole different kettle of fish

Tracer Hand, Friday, 31 August 2007 11:51 (eighteen years ago)

more asian babes on ile plz

blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 11:55 (eighteen years ago)

i find asian girls typically hugely attractive. but i haven't dated any :(

Does this make me a bastard or not?

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:05 (eighteen years ago)

A cowardly bastard maybe

Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 12:07 (eighteen years ago)

asian girls typically support martin jol

blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:08 (eighteen years ago)

"Does this make me a bastard or not?"

no, it makes you a likely peruser of asian porn.

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:09 (eighteen years ago)

"this thread, on the other hand, could be a whole different kettle of fish"

im surprised there is no 'Asian Women Who Exclusively Date White Men' thread.

"Are they allowed opinions?"

theyre not allowed to answer that.

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:10 (eighteen years ago)

"managers exclusively supported by asian women"

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:13 (eighteen years ago)

you people are revolting

Tracer Hand, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:24 (eighteen years ago)

Got out the wrong side of the bed this morning?

Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 12:25 (eighteen years ago)

"you people are revolting"

men, or asians?

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:26 (eighteen years ago)

"you people are revolting"

who? i dont think i said anything revolting.

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:27 (eighteen years ago)

in you're interested in this topic you could try reading the thread, which is a good one, rather than cracking jokes about how asian girls are all meek and subservient

Tracer Hand, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:29 (eighteen years ago)

Jawohl

Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 12:30 (eighteen years ago)

I could ask a few friends/our employee. She's Japanese, like some of my friends, who are married to caucasians. Actually, I take that back, the majority of these couples are already divorced. Our employee is the only one of two couples I know that are still together, the rest is divorced/seperated.

nathalie, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:31 (eighteen years ago)

hey! i didnt crack any jokes about that. my first comment was that i genuinely thought there was something missing from this thread as there didnt seem to be much from the POV of the asian girls in these relationships (maybe i just missed it? but then, thats not what the post title was about, although as they are part of the relationships i thought there should be something from their perspective). i did say "theyre not allowed to answer that" but i meant that sarcastically.

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:34 (eighteen years ago)

if you didn't mean it sarcastically it wouldn't be a "joke"

Tracer Hand, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:35 (eighteen years ago)

in all fairness you people are revolting is a good bet for pretty much any thread around here

jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:39 (eighteen years ago)

I think "you people are sarcastic" would have been kinder

Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 12:40 (eighteen years ago)

well FWIW, as an asian man, albeit of south asian descent (hooray for race-outing on the net!), rather than north (although south asian women do tend to be viewed in a similarly demure/subservient etc way), ill just say that is *not* what i think at all (that asian women are all meek and subservient). and i dont see how one pithy sarcastic comment means that that IS what i think.

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:46 (eighteen years ago)

i was just being sarcastic

jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:48 (eighteen years ago)

Is the Indian subcontinent really South Asian?

Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 12:48 (eighteen years ago)

yes it IS really south asian. why wouldnt it be?

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:49 (eighteen years ago)

yah

jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:50 (eighteen years ago)

Is the Momus on this thread the same as the Momus who was some sort of popstar in the eighties?

Zelda Zonk, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:51 (eighteen years ago)

lol

jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:51 (eighteen years ago)

I suppose it is, Indonesia is South Asian, Japan and China aren't really "North Asian" but you can't say Central Asian because of, errrrrrrrrr, Central Asia

Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 12:52 (eighteen years ago)

"I could ask a few friends/our employee."

do a census.

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:53 (eighteen years ago)

lol

Is that a no then?

Zelda Zonk, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:53 (eighteen years ago)

south asia refers to the indian subcontinent and surrounding islands

jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:54 (eighteen years ago)

THAT IS TEH MOMUS

jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:54 (eighteen years ago)

"in you're interested in this topic you could try reading the thread, which is a good one, rather than cracking jokes about how asian girls are all meek and subservient"

ok, people are attracted to other people, sometimes to very specific types of other people. apparently, other people are allowed to have a problem with this (for reasons that are frankly quite unclear to me), and post about it. but nobody is allowed to make joeks IS TAHT CLEAR?

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:55 (eighteen years ago)

"I suppose it is, Indonesia is South Asian, Japan and China aren't really "North Asian" but you can't say Central Asian because of, errrrrrrrrr, Central Asia"

well just look on a map. its pretty obvious that india and pakistan are south asia. you could maybe call china east asia.

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:55 (eighteen years ago)

well not 'you could maybe call china east asia', you DO call china east asia!

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:57 (eighteen years ago)

more jokes please. come on, it's the weekend!

blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:59 (eighteen years ago)

It's confused 'cos British people generally mean India/Pakistan when they say "Asian"

Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 12:59 (eighteen years ago)

in the US, asian means south asia, ie the indian subcontinent. in the US, asian means east asia, ie china, japan, korea, etc.

i thought everyone knew this. or are you just trying to get a rise?

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:03 (eighteen years ago)

<i>im surprised there is no 'Asian Women Who Exclusively Date White Men' thread.</i>

serious albeit anecdotal answer: my best friend has this stance because she thinks asian guys are too traditional and won't put up with her outspoken feminism. of course, she also is really disgusted by white men who fetishize asian women for the same reasons. (also, apparently the ones who are cowardly in person about admitting it come out in force on facebook).

Maria, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:04 (eighteen years ago)

well not 'you could maybe call china east asia', you DO call china east asia!

The Far East or Far Eastern!

Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 13:05 (eighteen years ago)

i suppose my more general point being that in the groups "white men who exclusively date asian women," and "asian women who exclusively date white men," the men and women are not the same set. you're looking for opinions from "asian women who exclusively date white men who exclusively date asian women." (xpost)

Maria, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:06 (eighteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Asia

jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:09 (eighteen years ago)

Iran!

Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 13:09 (eighteen years ago)

why not a thread on white men who exclusively date women, and their reasons for doing so?

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:12 (eighteen years ago)

The United Nations further includes Iran as part of Southern Asia

jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:12 (eighteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Asia

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:13 (eighteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeast_Asia

jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:14 (eighteen years ago)

East Asia and Eastern Asia (the latter form preferred by the United Nations) are both more modern terms for the traditional European name the Far East

Which is why, being European, the Far East is more common

Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 13:15 (eighteen years ago)

"why not a thread on white men who exclusively date women, and their reasons for doing so?"

yes, all discussion of race should be nixed wherever possible!

'far east' sounds very old school and antiquated.

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:15 (eighteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Men_Who_Exclusively_Date_Asian_Women

jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:16 (eighteen years ago)

Yet Middle East isn't! (xp)

Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 13:17 (eighteen years ago)

did they ever say 'the far west' in 'the far east'. 'up west' would've been better ala eastenders.

blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:17 (eighteen years ago)

tom d, please go away.

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:18 (eighteen years ago)

No

Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 13:18 (eighteen years ago)

tom d is from the far north

blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:18 (eighteen years ago)

"yes, all discussion of race should be nixed wherever possible!

not my point at all. as well have a thread about black men who exclusively date women, if you like.

or white men who exclusively date black men, if you wanna mix it. i can't see the relevance, nor why it's an issue for other people, let alone a 400 post thread that apparently is too serious to make anything other than po-faced sub-psych 101 comment on.

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:38 (eighteen years ago)

I actually asked a friend of mine about this a while back. She said she would not want to date a white guy who exclusively dates asian women, and she thinks it's kind of racist to say you prefer one race. So there's one asian woman's opinion for you.

jessie monster, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)

black men who exclusively date women, if you like.

Those damn black homophobes.

Colonel Poo, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:57 (eighteen years ago)

I'm immediately regretting posting that.

Colonel Poo, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:57 (eighteen years ago)

It's confused 'cos British people generally mean India/Pakistan when they say "Asian"

-- Tom D., Friday, August 31, 2007 1:59 PM (58 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

apparently this is a result of civil service designation of immigrants (into africa rather than the uk) in the 40s and 50s.

the stereotype referred to in this thread is, i think, asian in the american sense, coz iirc this was a 'zing momus' thread.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:03 (eighteen years ago)

the stereotype referred to in this thread is, i think, asian in the american sense, coz iirc this was a 'zing momus' thread.

I am aware of this!

Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 14:05 (eighteen years ago)

i'm not even sure these mythical 'won't date outside of a particular race' people exist.

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:09 (eighteen years ago)

um, except where it's their own race, on reflection. i'm aware there are plenty of those.

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:10 (eighteen years ago)

My husband is English so in the past year and a half we've dealt with a lot of immigration issues that led me to a message board about Americans who were marrying non US citizens. There were tons of many creepy men on there who had met their fiances on websites that were pretty much mail order bride type things. Some even posted about how Asian women were better because they knew how to listen and serve a man and they kept themselves in better shape than American women. Many (not all, of cof them did exclusively date or at least seek out Asian women for these reasons. It was pretty much disgusting.

ENBB, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:24 (eighteen years ago)

kinda more of a 'pervs on internet who import asian women' thread then, really?

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:45 (eighteen years ago)

the amount of American women i know married to English men is totally disproportionate to the number of American men i know married to English women.

blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:53 (eighteen years ago)

it's like 8-0

blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:53 (eighteen years ago)

It must be that American women are more submissive...........................

Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 14:54 (eighteen years ago)

no, it's that american women are bastards i think....

i may be getting this thread all rong.

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:54 (eighteen years ago)

I too wish to marry at least one American woman

blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:55 (eighteen years ago)

American men do not marry English women. Story of my life, really.

These people do exist, not just on internet creep forums. Two of my ex boyfriends were... well, obviously both of them dated me, so it wasn't exclusively Asian women, but there was a decided preference.

Masonic Boom, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)

the amount of American women i know married to English men is totally disproportionate to the number of American men i know married to English women.

Hi

Colonel Poo, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:01 (eighteen years ago)

point being, again, that there are people (not just white men) that have preferences. i'm not seeing where this is an issue for a concerned focus group formation.

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:02 (eighteen years ago)

the amount of American women i know married to English men is totally disproportionate to the number of American men i know married to English women

That's interesting. I do know a couple other American woman/English man couples but only one American man/English woman couple. I wonder why.

ENBB, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:06 (eighteen years ago)

I'm thinking it reflects badly on American men

Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)

DOESN'T EVERYTHING?

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:16 (eighteen years ago)

i know quite a few people that choose to date pretty much exclusively a certain racial group other than their own. maybe its cos they dont get approached by the opp sex in their own racial group or maybe its just that theyre not attracted to them and associate certain things with the group they do date. but either way, they do have a pretty strict unbending preference.

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:16 (eighteen years ago)

So, why aren't the Asian women who would date all this white men seen as creepy?

Bob Standard, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:18 (eighteen years ago)

allowing that, titchy, i'm not seeing why the subsets mentioned in this thread are in line for such a kicking.

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:22 (eighteen years ago)

or, more explicitly, the white men mentioned in this thread.

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:23 (eighteen years ago)

ENBB all but one of them met because the American woman was a big fan of British indie-pop. I mean to the friendly observer that is the clear connection between them all, which is fair dos at the end of the day.

blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)

Actually make that all but two.

blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:27 (eighteen years ago)

HA! You could probably add me to that list because that was the first thing that L and I ever talked about.

ENBB, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)

OMG.

I am a statistic.

Colonel Poo, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)

There is no shame in it at all.

blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:29 (eighteen years ago)

I think at one point on Sinister it was 12-0 (I am indeed one of the 12 - does the mere fact Sinister was involved mean British indie-pop was the catalyst by definition?).

Mark C, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:41 (eighteen years ago)

Aren't there a couple american dudes married to english chicks on the board? Like, other than Colonel Poo.

So, why aren't the Asian women who would date all this white men seen as creepy?

-- Bob Standard, Friday, August 31, 2007 11:18 AM (Friday, August 31, 2007 11:18 AM) Bookmark Link

Actually I've heard them vilified by other women as gold diggers, etc.

jessie monster, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:42 (eighteen years ago)

I wish I'd known these stats when I decided to spend my marriagble aged years in the States. ::weeps bitter tears::

Masonic Boom, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)

Colonel Poo is an English guy married to American woman tho...unless I'm confused.

Alex In NYC married an Englishwoman I believe.

blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)

but Alex In NYC is really from Tyneside - just don't tell anyone

blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)

theres actually tons of articles on this subject on the net (predictably). this one below, despite the shitty layout, has some good points. points 5, 6 and 8 are worth reading IMO.

http://modelminority.com/article113.html

eg - "So I have little patience for people who say "I just find X attractive; it's like ice cream flavors." People are NOT ice cream. I only ask that you ask yourself WHY you find attractive what you find attractive."

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)

lol gygax

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:52 (eighteen years ago)

xpost

and i only ask WHY it matters? is attraction something we have a duty to question ourselves on?

Should we be policing our attraction in case it offends others for reasons inside their own heads?

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:53 (eighteen years ago)

well, bryan says:

"It wouldn't bother me as much if Asian women were also dating black men or Latino men," Bryan says. "But it's white guys. I've heard Asian women say they only date white guys. And it's because we live in a white culture. They do it for status. It's self-contempt."

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:59 (eighteen years ago)

well, if bryan says it then i guess it's so.

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:02 (eighteen years ago)

eg - "So I have little patience for people who say "I just find X attractive; it's like ice cream flavors." People are NOT ice cream. I only ask that you ask yourself WHY you find attractive what you find attractive."

Oh noes, are you trying to tell me I should be looking at males other than DDBs because I've internalised the idea that all DDBs are stupid and drugged up, and therefore more willing to let me push them around?
;-)

Seriously, I haven't re-read the above thread, but my memory of it was, it was a lot of people over-exaggeratedly giving Momus hassle for very specific reasons that have more to do with him being, well... him than anything else.

However, stereotypes which are backed up with statistical evidence are worth investigating, for all the reasons explained in that linked article. It's as interesting from a gender based perspective as a racism-based perspective. Why do these common trans-culture pairings (Asian Woman-White male, British Man-American woman) not happen equally across the genders?

Masonic Boom, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:03 (eighteen years ago)

most of the asian men i know exclusively date asian women, too.

Maria, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:04 (eighteen years ago)

i really dont see how a british-american white couple is the same thing as a asian-white couple.

titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:05 (eighteen years ago)

It's similar because the relationships only go one way across gender lines. Which makes me wonder if there's a similar dynamic at work. Maybe not. But it's worth discussing.

Masonic Boom, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:08 (eighteen years ago)

i know at least three asian women who used to exclusively date white guys but have gone back to dating only asian guys...mostly they just got fed up with the W.M.W.E.D.A.W., often after dating a string of particularly terrible momus-types who don't treat them as unique or individual but as a fetish or sexual preference. then again i know plenty of white guy - asian woman couples where this is not the case, but the guys in question were not serial type daters in the first place.

any serial type dating seems like trouble, racial or otherwise.

bell_labs, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:31 (eighteen years ago)

exclusively dating on any trait is bad news, can we just leave it at that?

oh, and men are bastards

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:33 (eighteen years ago)

Well that only took five years.

Laurel, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:34 (eighteen years ago)

Exclusively dating any ethnicity seems pretty stupid. I always figure my dating chances are pretty slim as is! That said, Asian girls can be pretty cute. My parents on the other hand, are still holding out hope for a nice jewish girl.
-- bnw, Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:00 AM (5 years ago) Bookmark Link

darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:35 (eighteen years ago)

I'm too tired to read Kate's posts but I assume we should ban her right?

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:39 (eighteen years ago)

i only date girls with big asses. I've tried to date others, but it just didn't work out. I'm like a size queen. about asses.

will, Friday, 31 August 2007 19:19 (eighteen years ago)

So about next Friday....

Laurel, Friday, 31 August 2007 20:14 (eighteen years ago)

I dated an asian girl that had a mighty ass.
she hated it. and that made me sad :(

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Friday, 31 August 2007 20:37 (eighteen years ago)

So about next Friday....

next friday and every friday is set aside for spending time in the company of ladies with big asses. it's what I do. come join us on our big-ass adventure.

will, Friday, 31 August 2007 21:37 (eighteen years ago)

What about, "Gentlemen Prefer Blondes", racist movie?

Heave Ho, Friday, 31 August 2007 21:39 (eighteen years ago)

Joeks. Boyfriend wd not approve, I suspect.

Laurel, Friday, 31 August 2007 21:58 (eighteen years ago)

i only date girls with big asses. I've tried to date others, but it just didn't work out. I'm like a size queen. about asses.

-- will, Friday, August 31, 2007 2:19 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link

otm

deej, Friday, 31 August 2007 22:01 (eighteen years ago)

i also have a tendency to date dancers

deej, Friday, 31 August 2007 22:01 (eighteen years ago)

"dancers"

Jordan, Friday, 31 August 2007 22:06 (eighteen years ago)

lol exoticizing exotic dancers?

deej, Friday, 31 August 2007 22:08 (eighteen years ago)

ha

Jordan, Friday, 31 August 2007 22:11 (eighteen years ago)

in the US, asian means south asia, ie the indian subcontinent. in the US, asian means east asia, ie china, japan, korea, etc.

i thought everyone knew this. or are you just trying to get a rise?

Least helpful explanation ever?

HI DERE, Saturday, 1 September 2007 01:34 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.qwantz.com/comics/comic2-710.png

Nathan, Saturday, 1 September 2007 04:35 (eighteen years ago)

Who are the American-English couples on ILX? Mark C/sgs, Colette/Toby, Adamrl/Sarah, who else?

jaymc, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:47 (eighteen years ago)

the Lex/Paris Hilton

HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)

me/my husband who won't tell me his username

ENBB, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)

(I was going to do a drawn-out "Paris Hilton is Nude Spock" joke; it is for the best I got xposted before I could figure out how to get to the punchline.)

HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/33544275@N00/1323347199/

brownie, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:55 (eighteen years ago)

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1100/1323347199_41b4172d46_o.jpg

brownie, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:58 (eighteen years ago)

There is a nomnom gorgeous, funny Japanese boy in one of my classes who I would exclusively date were I not exclusively dating a wonderful man who I already love. It is hell of fun to idle flirt with this cuets man, tho.

Abbott, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:18 (eighteen years ago)

darraghmac, you are a treat on this thread.

kv_nol, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:22 (eighteen years ago)

A bad scan of the New Answers page made me accidentally read "White Men Who Exclusively Date Ethiopian Food"

nabisco, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:23 (eighteen years ago)

Which, you know, you could do worse.

nabisco, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:24 (eighteen years ago)

"Judging by the smell, I'm guessing these leftovers are from late June."

jaymc, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:41 (eighteen years ago)

"my wife's been having an affair with some ethiopian food"

"injera?"

"i'll bloody well kill her!"

blueski, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:45 (eighteen years ago)

Steve, you're setting someone up for a terrible "wat's on first" routine.

jaymc, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:49 (eighteen years ago)

Unless you want to call tibs on it yourself.

jaymc, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:49 (eighteen years ago)

Ibe created a monster.

nabisco, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 23:00 (eighteen years ago)

I dated a Chinese girl for two years. To this day, I find Asian girls who resemble her EXTREMELY attractive.

Other than that, I find a whole lot of women attractive.

Especially those with asses. mmmmmmMMMM!!!!

B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 5 September 2007 01:59 (eighteen years ago)

For what it's worth, I'm still exclusively dating the same Asian woman I mentioned in this thread years ago. We've been together about ten years now, married for 3, and we have a beautiful, sweet 1 year old kid.

I've met lots of non-Asian guys with Japanese wives and girlfriends over the years, mostly guys who are dating my wife's Japanese friends. Marriage and serial dating are different things, but I have to say these guys don't really fit a type (other than that they are the type of guy likely to be dating/married to a friend of my wife e.g. generally pretty nice funny guys though of course the occasional scoundrel and/or rogue slips in). I've also met a few Japanese guys with non-Japanese girlfriends or wives, but it isn't as common.

There are some common problems in this type of cross-cultural relationship that I've witnessed and experienced - some different ideas about how to run a house or raise a kid, some difficulty communicating sometimes - but I can't say if those problems might be just as prevelant in any couple made up of people from extremely different backgrounds. I expect they would be. Most of our fights are about the usual things: money, laundry, dishes, whatever.

The ex-pat guys I've met in Japan seem to me to have more common traits than N. American Non-Asian dudes dating Japanese women - but I shouldn't generalize because I haven't spent as much time with them.

Not sure if that adds anything to the discussion.

fritz, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 15:11 (eighteen years ago)

I recently went to a bachelor party in which I was the only asian. I was talking with a group of 3 other guys and we somehow realized that all 4 of us had asian girlfriends. I asked them why they dated asians, and without skipping a beat they said that it was because in San Francisco, the "higher quality" women happened to be mostly asian. They claimed that asians were generally better educated, took better care of themselves, and were more ambitious. Each guy confirmed this.

I may be wrong since I'd only met these guys briefly a couple times before, but they seemed genuine. It caught me off guard since I had always thought some white guys just had a fetish for asian girls. And I found it refreshing because it made sense and seemed somewhat objective(ish).

Wookie Rookie, Thursday, 6 September 2007 06:31 (eighteen years ago)

They claimed that asians were generally better educated, took better care of themselves, and were more ambitious.

This is just hilarious. Sweeping generalisations to cover your fascination with a group of women from another culture. You should have loaded them up with some alcohol and/or drugs, maybe they would have added: they're better in the sack. Talk about positive discrimination. (I jest of course. In a way.) I mean, what if you said: "I dislike Moroccan guys because they are generally not well educated, take less good care of themselves and are less ambitious!" (Something that is said at times here in our country.)

nathalie, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:07 (eighteen years ago)

I think white guys with long hair are supremely intelligent and tasteful beings of pure heart.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:18 (eighteen years ago)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=gmqX75fQiDs
;l

luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:40 (eighteen years ago)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=lTMGJTh90zM
;1

luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:40 (eighteen years ago)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=PQzfWCxCZXY
;>

luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:42 (eighteen years ago)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=I4kUain1cOc
;I

luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:43 (eighteen years ago)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=-RZtljxOjJk
lol they look like mongoloids

luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:43 (eighteen years ago)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Nv5UdPWkZ7U
Ü

luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:45 (eighteen years ago)

I think white guys with long hair are supremely intelligent and tasteful beings of pure heart.

Well, duh, you like dEUS!

stevienixed, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:49 (eighteen years ago)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=-ylwPXbM_bY
;?

luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:49 (eighteen years ago)

^lol

luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:50 (eighteen years ago)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=as2E_ThTSBQ
‘‘

luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:52 (eighteen years ago)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=7Ni3n0afYrA
tell me my creep game ain't on point ;]

luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:54 (eighteen years ago)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=DmyomjQPQsQ&mode=related&search=

luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:55 (eighteen years ago)

http://youtube.com/watch?v=0d71v6WpEI0&mode=related&search=
;'

luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:57 (eighteen years ago)

ftw ^^^^^^^^^^

luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:57 (eighteen years ago)

i should be shot ;]

luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 09:00 (eighteen years ago)

;>

, Thursday, 6 September 2007 09:17 (eighteen years ago)

four months pass...

id say a lot (not all though) of these girls have self hate issues or are trying to move up the social ladder.

mr x, Monday, 21 January 2008 18:16 (seventeen years ago)

I'd say you were trolling.

Bodrick III, Monday, 21 January 2008 18:18 (seventeen years ago)

id say you have a right to your poorly formed opinion.

mr x, Monday, 21 January 2008 18:25 (seventeen years ago)

old ilx

DG, Monday, 21 January 2008 18:34 (seventeen years ago)

"I'm a Leg Man"

I want to hear someone say this and somehow know they're making inappropriate Milne-style proper nouns. Or do I?

Abbott, Monday, 21 January 2008 18:36 (seventeen years ago)

But why would anyone do that? Asian girls are neither blonde nor leggy

Embarchie, Monday, 28 January 2008 23:34 (seventeen years ago)

^ uh

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 28 January 2008 23:44 (seventeen years ago)

tru

chaki, Monday, 28 January 2008 23:52 (seventeen years ago)

i'm more of a wheel man myself

http://www.invisionauto.com/Photo%20albums/LI%20Extreme/Radio%20Cit%20Rat.jpg

rockapads, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 00:02 (seventeen years ago)

What about Chinese Men Who Exclusively Date Japanese Women?

http://www.japantoday.com/jp/shukan/432

S-, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 00:18 (seventeen years ago)

"I feel superior when having sex with Japanese women because their country invaded China in the past. This is a kind of payback"

Embarchie, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 00:24 (seventeen years ago)

"The next 10 thrusts are for the Nanking Massacre"

Embarchie, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 00:27 (seventeen years ago)

I've never understood why white males are the only ones in this equation who are being ridiculed and criticised for only dating/fetishising asian women. I mean, it's way, way more common for asian women to date white males than the opposite. Looks to me that it's the asian women who are "obsessed" with white males.

Lovelace, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 00:20 (seventeen years ago)

But the original question is about white dudes. Their behaviour is strange. I mean, asian girls do not even have big boobs.

Embarchie, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 00:27 (seventeen years ago)

two years pass...

bada bing

rip whiney g weingarten 03/11 never forget (history mayne), Thursday, 2 December 2010 18:59 (fourteen years ago)

Embarchie

(ㅅ) (am0n), Thursday, 2 December 2010 19:00 (fourteen years ago)

why did momus leave anyway

come back momus-chan...

Princess TamTam, Thursday, 2 December 2010 19:08 (fourteen years ago)

But the original question is about white dudes. Their behaviour is strange. I mean, asian girls do not even have big boobs.

― Embarchie, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 00:27 (2 years ago)

Ectothiorhodospira shaposhnikovii (nakhchivan), Thursday, 2 December 2010 19:08 (fourteen years ago)

I would be one of those guys if I could get past the existence of stereotypes. I dated a Korean for a few weeks when one conversation just derailed our relationship:
(phone conversation)
ME: so what are you doing?
HER: nothing, having a snack
ME: Oh yeah, whatcha eatin' (duh, dumb endearing quality)
HER: rice
ME: What kind?
HER: What?
ME: What kind of rice? (realizing I just made a mistake)
HER: Have you ever had Korean food?
ME: YEAH, of course... No, wait, actually, I'm not sure that I have, actually...
HER: Koreans eat a lot of rice
ME: Um, I'm sure not all Koreans do. I mean, wouldn't it be kind of stereotypical if I said, "RICE! Of course you're eating rice!" (I said something to this affect, but can't remember exactly)
HER: I like rice.
ME: Me too! Rice pilaf... rice... hey, do you like risotto?
HER: You got something against rice?
ME: No, no, of course not. Leave me alone, gook! (just kidding!)

seriously, I don't remember the specifics, but surprisingly to me, a conversation about rice was what seemed to split us apart. I just felt alienated, as I'm sure did she, and yet I was just being a casual american. It actually didn't occur to me that she'd be eating RICE. That's like eating sprouts or something-- where's the rest of the meal?

But, Asians can be BAYOOTEEEFUL and I think they're hot.

― Nude Spock, Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:00 PM (8 years ago) Bookmark

The Dumbest Jews on the Planet (and Maureen Dowd) (symsymsym), Friday, 3 December 2010 16:36 (fourteen years ago)

two years pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRHLIvg7zHQ

http://theyreallsobeautiful.com/

乒乓, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 12:41 (twelve years ago)

I have met too many of those kinds of dudes.

Heyman (crüt), Wednesday, 3 April 2013 13:18 (twelve years ago)

i cracked up @ the dude @ 1:58

乒乓, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 13:20 (twelve years ago)

not guys who date asian women. I don't have a problem with that. I mean the creepy racist porn-damaged asian fetish dudes. I hate to kneejerk hate on shut-ins but the weird obsession with racial & sexual submission is something I can't forgive in anyone.

x-post 2:21 was the biggest "this fuckin guy" moment for me

Heyman (crüt), Wednesday, 3 April 2013 13:24 (twelve years ago)

two weeks pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kbGrQe17cU

i hadn't actually seen the traielr for this, wowwwwwwww so uncomfortable/awkward

乒乓, Monday, 22 April 2013 21:22 (twelve years ago)

unban momus

turds (Hungry4Ass), Monday, 22 April 2013 21:25 (twelve years ago)

^

乒乓, Monday, 22 April 2013 21:26 (twelve years ago)

http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2332/1720860102_514c7ba55c_m.jpg

some dude, Monday, 22 April 2013 21:29 (twelve years ago)

I read that as urban momus

ヘイシグ・ブローズ (MaresNest), Monday, 22 April 2013 21:30 (twelve years ago)

ugh

the late great, Monday, 22 April 2013 21:31 (twelve years ago)

now i feel dirty for clicking on this thread

the late great, Monday, 22 April 2013 21:31 (twelve years ago)

Oh
my
god

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Monday, 22 April 2013 21:55 (twelve years ago)

"Oh look, there's two of 'em!" If there are a lot more moments like that during the movie I...no, I can't lie, I will absolutely watch that.

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Monday, 22 April 2013 21:57 (twelve years ago)

duuuuuuuuuuuuude so awesome must show wife

The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Monday, 22 April 2013 22:00 (twelve years ago)

i will def, def see that

holy shit

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 22 April 2013 22:53 (twelve years ago)

Amazing

pssstttt, Hey you (dog latin), Monday, 22 April 2013 22:59 (twelve years ago)

i couldn't even watch the trailer

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Monday, 22 April 2013 23:00 (twelve years ago)

is Momus actually banned? lol.

Pat Finn, Monday, 22 April 2013 23:08 (twelve years ago)

i couldn't even watch the trailer

― well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Monday, April 22, 2013 7:00 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark

it was extra tough for me since i could understand everything she was saying, intonation etc.

乒乓, Monday, 22 April 2013 23:09 (twelve years ago)

Is it even more grim than it looks?

ヘイシグ・ブローズ (MaresNest), Monday, 22 April 2013 23:32 (twelve years ago)

well the part where he thinks he's rehearsing wedding vows and she's doing some play-talking-to-children ish about cutting off fingers and toes stuff, yikes

乒乓, Monday, 22 April 2013 23:37 (twelve years ago)

yeah I can't see it ending well and/or happily for either of them

whole thing looks v sad and awkward just from the trailer

set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 22 April 2013 23:41 (twelve years ago)

Too bad my wife will never ever post on here about creepo dudes like that guy. Or maybe I'm glad she won't, given that I've heard plenty of stories.

Hopefully there will be a sequel about his second wife from Thailand. Who, hopefully will have a dick.

The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Monday, 22 April 2013 23:52 (twelve years ago)

I remember listening to a story about this film on npr a while back: http://www.npr.org/2012/06/22/155571292/for-one-man-she-had-to-be-pretty-and-asian

I'm interested in seeing the movie.

The last of the famous international Greyjoys (Nicole), Monday, 22 April 2013 23:53 (twelve years ago)

LUM: Yeah. You know, growing up as an Asian-American woman, you can not live without encountering so many men like the main character of my film.

what my wife says

The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Monday, 22 April 2013 23:59 (twelve years ago)

i feel like fetishizing a specific race is a racist thing to do because it has to do with "exoticization," which works to reify racial difference. in 2013, whether someone is asian or not should not be a big deal. i don't know how momus got around that critique of his asian fetish.

Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 00:45 (twelve years ago)

is Momus actually banned? lol.

― Pat Finn, Monday, April 22, 2013 7:08 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark

i dunno, i asked where he went a while back and someone said he was, i think.

turds (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 00:50 (twelve years ago)

god that movie looks both hilarious and painfully awkward/creepy. want to see it, but i expect i'll spend half the running time watching from between my fingers.

I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:00 (twelve years ago)

parts of this and discussion from the director were on This American Life a few weeks ago

xpost maybe from that other NPR story?

Devendra Bumhat (sic), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:03 (twelve years ago)

i wouldn't be able to sit through that movie, i don't think.

Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:03 (twelve years ago)

bc of the cringe-factor

Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:04 (twelve years ago)

Momus isn't banned iirc, he left (but kept lurking everyday, according to himself when he blamed SB for killing Bimble)

Devendra Bumhat (sic), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:04 (twelve years ago)

jeez. he actually said that?

Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:06 (twelve years ago)

x-post 2:21 was the biggest "this fuckin guy" moment for me

― Heyman (crüt), Wednesday, April 3, 2013 9:24 AM (2 weeks ago)

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mdcakumIju1rt290oo2_1280.png

veryupsetmom (harbl), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:16 (twelve years ago)

Momus isn't banned iirc, he left (but kept lurking everyday, according to himself when he blamed SB for killing Bimble)

― Devendra Bumhat (sic), Monday, April 22, 2013 9:04 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark

ty

turds (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:17 (twelve years ago)

now i'm depressed and want to harm momus

I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:18 (twelve years ago)

sb?? what?

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:18 (twelve years ago)

well the part where he thinks he's rehearsing wedding vows and she's doing some play-talking-to-children ish about cutting off fingers and toes stuff, yikes

Was I the only one who had subtitles?

pplains, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:22 (twelve years ago)

well the part where he thinks he's rehearsing wedding vows and she's doing some play-talking-to-children ish about cutting off fingers and toes stuff, yikes

read this and for some reason kind of immediately thought of 'audition.'

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:23 (twelve years ago)

Good work, Internet.

http://cdn1.images.videobash.com/photos/000/042/401/42401.jpg

pplains, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:29 (twelve years ago)

i've noticed this. it's fucking weird and gross. unless, i suppose, you're an asian porn star, in which case, go team.

I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:31 (twelve years ago)

huge lol at pplains

balls, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:33 (twelve years ago)

Hopefully there will be a sequel about his second wife from Thailand. Who, hopefully will have a dick.

wanna roll this fucking colonialist racist garbage back a little dandy don? signed, a guy whose inlaws are all from Thailand, you fucking dick

not feeling those lighters (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:46 (twelve years ago)

You're having a hard time with sarcasm. Get over yourself.

The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:49 (twelve years ago)

north vs south

balls, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:49 (twelve years ago)

your "sarcasm" is gross racist crap. I know from your posts here you think you get a pass, but you don't. eat shit.

not feeling those lighters (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:50 (twelve years ago)

underrated aerosmith is right dandy, that pose was offensive on multiple levels. and not just in a PC way, but in a way where i can actually imagine a transperson reading that and feeling hurt and alienated.

Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:51 (twelve years ago)

*post

Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:51 (twelve years ago)

lol @ imagining dandy don accepting trans people as actually being people

not feeling those lighters (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:52 (twelve years ago)

Was I the only one who had subtitles?

― pplains, Monday, April 22, 2013 9:22 PM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark

i was speaking more to the intonation/cues in her voice and the way she said stuff

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:53 (twelve years ago)

in the beginning when she finds out whatever bureaucratic process he went through wasn't actually legally binding, there's a real note of panic + fear in her voice

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:54 (twelve years ago)

is there some kind of thai = trans stereotype i'm not aware of? hate to ask, but i'm a little lost...

I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:57 (twelve years ago)

apparently

The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:58 (twelve years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathoey

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:59 (twelve years ago)

okay, expanding universe and all

I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:01 (twelve years ago)

So sorry for any sort of unintended allusions to stereotype. Unintentional. I guess I need to get out more often.

The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:02 (twelve years ago)

dude. no.

Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:06 (twelve years ago)

come on. that was not unintentional. it is a really common stereotype. a popular iteration of it has -- as in your "joke" -- an american in thailand "accidentally" having sex with a trans person. this can be seen in the hangover 2, but also other places

Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:07 (twelve years ago)

boy this is boring

balls, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:10 (twelve years ago)

come on. that was not unintentional.

I've never seen either Hangover movie. Sorry I'm not up to date with this stereotype. None of my buddies have ever been on a sex tour of Thailand, but my impression was that kind of thing was with underage girls.

Again, I'm sorry about that.

The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:13 (twelve years ago)

yeah i thought thailand related fetish was pedophilia myself also. i think every trans person i know is white or black, would guess that's the case in sandy springs or atlanta or wherever don lives now.

balls, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:16 (twelve years ago)

i've never read anything about women into asian guys. feel like i'm asking for a disaster if i'm just asking for uninformed opinions here and iunno if anyone on ilx actually would want to share their experiences in this regard... i do know its a thing, i do know my sense is that it is much less creepy in general, but i have the feeling its not really talked about as much. i'd be interested in any suggestions for articles or anything?

Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:18 (twelve years ago)

^i personally know one woman like that, and that's 100% of my knowledge on the subject

Andrew Stockdale Kills Wolfmother, self (electricsound), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:20 (twelve years ago)

i don't think anybody's done any sort of theorizing on the subject

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:20 (twelve years ago)

oh jeez, there's this one blog about it, what's it called

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:21 (twelve years ago)

lol: http://www.speakingofchina.com/

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:22 (twelve years ago)

haha speaking out of turn here and i may be wrong here in which case my bad but i knew a girl, who posted here sometimes, who definitely seemed to be dating almost exclusively indian dudes for a while there. generally though when i've known women who gone for some interracial exclusivity it was black women who were into white guys or white women who were into black guys. that could just be greater opportunity though, i've known way more whites and blacks than asians. i've never known of anything as developed and creepy as yr momus types though.

balls, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:25 (twelve years ago)

xpost ok i am finding that blog a bit creepy.

Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:26 (twelve years ago)

did link to this article tho: http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/ASIAN-POP-Opening-the-box-2464552.php

Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:31 (twelve years ago)

i've never read anything about women into asian guys. feel like i'm asking for a disaster if i'm just asking for uninformed opinions here and iunno if anyone on ilx actually would want to share their experiences in this regard... i do know its a thing, i do know my sense is that it is much less creepy in general, but i have the feeling its not really talked about as much. i'd be interested in any suggestions for articles or anything?

― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Monday, April 22, 2013 10:18 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark

i was looking at an amwf tumblr run by a white girl a while back, so they're out there

turds (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:34 (twelve years ago)

dunno if it's mentioned upthread but louis theroux did a show about guys like this going to thailand to find brides.

fit and working again, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:37 (twelve years ago)

Re how "creepy" or whatever it is, only Asian dudes who are being fetishized can answer that, depending on how creepy they find it. It doesn't have the overlay of "subservient" femininity in quite the same way, though, and never can. Which, on that point I feel like there's a straight line between the "subservience" of Asian women and colonialism, but someone can school me if that is wrong or incomplete?

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:41 (twelve years ago)

no i think that's the whole issue right there -- why this particular fetish seems creepy and problematic. especially with the added thing about these "brides" from asia being desperate for a green card -- which seems to be the case in that movie -- the power asymmetry is pretty galling and, you have to suspect, part of the appeal for that dude

Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:44 (twelve years ago)

"on that point I feel like there's a straight line between the "subservience" of Asian women and colonialism"

in one sense, yeah, but bear in mind that asian societies (huge generalization to be made i know, but...) took a leap from feudal/pre-feudal forms into the modern world fairly abruptly. like some western dudes might fetishize japanese women as being 'submissive' but what's actually expected of japanese women in japan is pretty regressive too typically. mainland china i can't speak to, but i think there's an irony here in that its a society that went through a revolution and had a sort of huge shake-up in the role of women. so if there's a place in the region where ethnically chinese women would be the least accepting of any sort of china-doll bullshit, i'd imagine it would be the mainland?

Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:55 (twelve years ago)

arranged fetishization

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:59 (twelve years ago)

wow so i googled up reviews of this film and multiple ones have the guy in question "responding" to the film in the comments.

e.g. http://rogersmovienation.com/2013/03/28/movie-review-seeking-asian-female-at-the-florida-film-festival/

Many misconceptions fade away with this film. Many seem to remain. Many arise anew.
“Sight Unseen?” Debbie Lum being an ABC came loaded with her own stereotypes imbued in her vision.
While it does capture some truths, ithe film does not show the entire truth.
In the end it is only Debbie Lum’s view of our life and her version of our life.

What does not come across, and what you did not notice, is the fact that I took nine trips to China to meet different people. People who, like me, wanted to change their lives.
I met Sandy on the fifth trip after ten months of almost daily email and WebCam communication with each other for long hours at a time before we even met in person.
Sandy was raised in the country on a tea farm which gave her a grounding of good morals and a work ethic.
Then ten years in the big city where her hard work and determination led her to become an executive secretary in an upscale fashion company.
She was not a face in a catalog that I ordered by number. She is a vibrant, intelligent, can-do person with a quick wit and wonderful sense of humor.
My first time with her was a two week long 24/7visit that was great fun and we communicated rather well with the aid of our electronics and old-fashioned hand gestures.

Then followed a short visit to meet her parents and tell them we were serious.
Then another two week visit to make sure we were still on track with each other.
And then a final visit to go to the US Consulate and prove that we want to be truly a married couple.
I dare say that this is a longer and more formal courtship then most American couples undertake.

To have it summed up as a “creepy love affair” is quite an insulting paycheck for my open honesty.
To have our love doubted or put as questionable by someone who has not even talked to me strikes me as slightly arrogant.

What has followed, besides the few misunderstanding stumbling blocks of culture shock featured in the film, is a marriage of three and a half years that has grown in happiness and love.

As for my attraction to the exotic beauty of Asian women, really, what’s not to like?
It is really a numbers game as well. The odds are on my side.
There are billions of Chinese.
Here in America I am an invisible almost non human with greatly reduced minimal receptive choices.
In China I am greeted continually with smiling happy faces wherever I go.

Not a tough decision.
It is a totally pragmatic and practical decision on my part.
My “creepy” search was a methodical process of finding one person with whom I had the best chemistry.
I found her.

Steven Bolstad
Protagonist
Creepy White Guy
Seeking Asian Female

Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:17 (twelve years ago)

lol his signature. hope he signs emails that way too

brony james (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:21 (twelve years ago)

Here in America I am an invisible almost non human with greatly reduced minimal receptive choices.

Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:28 (twelve years ago)

:'-(

Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:28 (twelve years ago)

I think there was a smiley by "creepy white guy" that my copy/paste didn't pick up.

Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:31 (twelve years ago)

really, what’s not to like?

fit and working again, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:32 (twelve years ago)

xpost s. clover, lol and ew. yeah, that guy basically admits that he looked to china to find a wife because over there he can exploit his white american privilege to attract women who wouldn't give him a second look if they felt they had more opportunities and options. i say fuck this guy.

Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:36 (twelve years ago)

As for my attraction to the exotic beauty of Asian women, really, what’s not to like?

The only sentence of his entire response that matters.

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:38 (twelve years ago)

p much

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:57 (twelve years ago)

idk, doesnt the entire thread discuss that without convincingly coming to that pat of a conclusion?

the gowls are not what they seem (darraghmac), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 06:01 (twelve years ago)

Which, on that point I feel like there's a straight line between the "subservience" of Asian women and colonialism, but someone can school me if that is wrong or incomplete?

― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Monday, April 22, 2013 10:41 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

yeah - america's had a p long history with colonialism and asia, see not only world war ii/korean war/vietnam war etc., but also the colonization of the philippines. see also the continuing military bases in japan, korea, philippines. see also: the war brides act of 1945, which provided a route for asian spouses of us servicemen to immigrate at a time when asians were p much exclusively barred from immigrating into the us. also prob doesn't need to be said, but wherever the US military went, brothels in the area did a brisk trade, or where there was none, there would be after the military established itself there.

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 11:49 (twelve years ago)

in one sense, yeah, but bear in mind that asian societies (huge generalization to be made i know, but...) took a leap from feudal/pre-feudal forms into the modern world fairly abruptly. like some western dudes might fetishize japanese women as being 'submissive' but what's actually expected of japanese women in japan is pretty regressive too typically. mainland china i can't speak to, but i think there's an irony here in that its a society that went through a revolution and had a sort of huge shake-up in the role of women. so if there's a place in the region where ethnically chinese women would be the least accepting of any sort of china-doll bullshit, i'd imagine it would be the mainland?

― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Monday, April 22, 2013 10:55 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

problem w/ this argument is up until recently, the treatment of women in western societies was pretty regressive too! (and still is, in many respects.) putting aside whether these generalizations are actually true or not, giving these dudes a pass for simply 'slotting in' to preexisting structures of oppression is nagl imo. also doesnt really go anywhere in explaining the dynamics of the relationship between these dudes and asian american women who were born or grew up here.

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 11:54 (twelve years ago)

a billion smiling faces

pplains, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:07 (twelve years ago)

http://i2.ytimg.com/vi/iCQ0vDAbF7s/mqdefault.jpg

pplains, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:08 (twelve years ago)

I wish that was a gif where Peter was looking up and shaking his head.

pplains, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:08 (twelve years ago)

ORIENTAL GIRLS
Tony Rivers examines the enduring appeal of the great western male fantasy

My little China girl/You shouldn't mess with me/I'll ruin everything you
are/I'll give you television/I'll give you eyes of blue/I'll give you man
who wants to/rule the world/And when I get excited/my little China girl
says/Oh baby just you shut your mouth/She says...sh-sh-shh

China Girl, courtesy of David Bowie

She says sh-sh-shh, and the white devil says 'slip out of your ch-ch-cheong
sam and kick off your Imedldas' to his Sino-Barbie, adorable doll,
sh-sh-shameless from Shanghai. Ahhh, silky, silky, sh-sh-shhh...
We are in a high-rish area. This is about race and sex, and you
are going to need a fine sensibility to distinguish the stereotypes and
face up to the amorality of desire and the sexual trade-offs that happen
between races. Otherwise things get ugly.
They did when one kind of zealot gfot excited about the video which
promoted China Girl (it bordered on the adult) but another kind missed an
open goal, Waddle, in failing to condemn it for being not quite the right
kind of positive discrimination. Paul Theroux was less fortunate. A
Playboy article in extravagant praise of oriental girls caused him to be
vilified as the worst kind of chauvinistic brute. It seems that 'oriental
girls' are being redesignated as 'Asian women', 'oriental girls' having,it
is said, connotations of sexual imperialism. Certainly, the story of
occidental/oriental amatory encounters (Madame Butteryfly, Miss Saigon)
tells us that when East meets West, the West gets yellow fever, and the
East gets fucked. But even the newest of men would find if difficult to
dump the oriental girl and all she implies (or promises) from his cultural
baggage. Fantasy management is an impossibility; dreams don't get
Whitehoused.
The stereotype of the oriental girl is the greatest sexual
shared fantasy among western men, and like all the best fantasies, it is
based on virtual ignorance and uncorrupted by actuality. It is so durable
and potent, it must mean something important and contain some element of
truth (about us). Despite the mail order bride industry, it isn't just
about domination, submission, and sexual avarice. There is a wistfullness
there too, and a longing that won't go away. So let's get down to
Sino-eroticism and girls with short sweet names, into the nexus of eroticism
and exoticism.
Heterosexuality, as you may have notices, is a celebration of
difference. Any additional foreignness is therefor welcome; it adds to the
thrill and makes the union more pleasing. Oriental girls are about as
foreign as you can get and, even better, the difference is compounded by
a zillion times by their apparent ultra-femininity. Ultra-femininity in the
West seems to have something to do with frills, frocks, and flounces (a lot
of those) and having to tow a trailerload of cosmetics behind the car when
you go away for a weekend. It also tends to be expensive and non-productive.
You might as well not bother actually to take the ultra-feminine western
girl out-- just send her round a lot of money in a taxi. But oriental

[Full page photo of smiling, sunglass wearing Asian model in low cut outfit]

[Full page photo of female crotch area, with clapsed hands squeezed between
thighs. Superemposed caption: On a special day, she might duplicate herself
and give you a two-girl body massage culmination in a venus butterfly]

girls (all half-billion of them) are graced by a natural, deep-down
femininity that makes the average bimbo look like Les Dawson.
If this is true (and of course, it is) then the consequences of
having a liason with such a creature could be startling. Give her
extreme femininity, any macho displays designed to separate the boys from
the girls would become redundant. She might soften over-masculinity.
It could enven get more startling, for it seems in one strand of Chinese
sexual thinking that the purpose of sex is the exchange of male and female
characteristics. Alternatively, if you are as butch as Julian Clary,
she'll make you feel like John Wayne.
It is for all those reasons that so many western men have gone
native. Silky, they say, these sexual expatriates, silky, silky. Man
gave a rib to make woman, but it seems that the oriental girl is worth
an arm and a leg.
She is small for a start (takes up less room in your house, says a
cynic), graceful (doesn't bang into furniture). Her shortness may account
for her show fetishism, her many pairs of stiletto Imeldas which she wears
only where appropriate, that is to say, in the street and in bed. Her
skin colour-- ah, that delicious discrimination-- and its texture-- no
blotches, no blemishes, no hint of unwanted hair, lotus-fed, innocent of
roses, silky, silky. Her hair, long and black and shiny, serenely straight,
not excited in waves or curls in fraudulent mimicry or promise of
post-coital disorder. Maybe when she was a poor peasant girl she would
sell it to be bleached in a factory for export to western baldies and maybe
it ended up dead a dyed khaki atop a Brucei, not so silky anymore.
Her face-- round like a child's, small nose like a model's, eyes
almond shaped for mystery, black for suffering, wide-space for innocence,
high cheekbones swelling like bruises, cherry lips. She has no tits, says
the carping mammophile, and no bum says the man who likes a handy shelf
for his martini glass. But she needs no over-elaborated characteristics to
announce or advertise her femininity; that comes from her suppleness and the
fact that she is made of a different flesh-- rice and spice and all things
nice. She is, of course, always young, a lot like a child, and obedient
daughter. And she's a mother too, grateful for the chance to worry. She
cares for you and always forgives, grants you refuge and soothes you with
the stillest part of her female psyche. You lay down your western neurosis
to this rice Madonna. Sh-sh-shhh.
Wehn you get home from another hard day on the planet, she comes
into existence, removes your clothing, bathes you and walks naken on your
back to relax you. And then this is sex. She is sh-sh-shameless, of
course. In the cultrual melange of your fantasy, the sex is pure, there
being no Christianity to smear it. Here we are talking about the art of
love, the secrets fo ancient pleasurings passed down through the female
line. Sexually manipulative and over-rehearsed, some say of the oriental
girl; perfect, you think. You don't care that the application of the
opposition of cosmic forces to sex, the yin-yang implies that it is more
life-enhancing to give rather than to receive orgasms. She makes you
spend like a sailor. On a very special day, the oriental girl might
duplicated herslef (such are the mysteries of the East) and give you a

two girl body massage culminating in a venus butterfly; then again, she
may uses a trunkful of strange implements, the purpose of which is

difficult to ascertain, until you start smiling a lot. She's fun you see,
and so uncomplicated. She doeesn't go to assertiveness-traing classes,
insist on being treated like a person, fret about career moves, wield her
orgasm as a non-negotiable demand.
Does she exist? Of course she does. She been around a long
time now, and she's anything you want her to be.
[Full page pic of Asian female model, face/eyes downcast, tight, short dress]

So compliant. She's the last refuge of the roue. Shes there when
you need short leave from those angry feminist seas. She's a handy victim
of love or a symbol of the rape of the third world nations, a real trouper.
She was Puccini's M. Butterfly as early as 1900 and she's currently in
Miss Saigon. Both times, it ended in tears.
In the early Sixties, played by the actress Tsai Chin, she
appeared in The World Of Suzie Wong. She was (what else?) a tart with a
heart. As a show, it apparently wasn't up to much. The priapic drama critc
Kenneth Tynan described the contemporary craze for China-girl shows at a
'a world of woozy song'. (He then had an affair with the forgiving Tsai
Chin) One spin-off from the show was a world wide hit called The Ding
Dong Song. Another was a fashion craze. English girls would grow their
hair long and dye it black, pencil their eyes into almond shapes and
sqeeze themselves, often idadvisedly, into a cheong-sam. (The cheong-sam
is long overdue for a revival, and as it is a part of your sexual heritage,
you have the right to know that it is a very tight dress, the demure, high
neckline of which is flatly contradicted by the face that it is slit to the
thigh. It embodies innocence and wantoness.) Suzie Wong was the
originator of the modern fantasy; She, in the form of real-life tarts of
uncertian racial origins, would for years advertised playful submissiveness
in the windows of newsagent's shops. Perhaps even now, on a signboard in
a secondary shopping parade on the edge of a small town, Suze awaits a
call.
Meanwhile, she is young and vital in fat paperback novels. She is
Mai-Mai in Tai Pan and she kowtows and says things like: "You are so bad to
me and I am so good to you. Let's make love." Afterwards, her lover
reaches for the hot towels she has prepared for him. 'No,' she says, '
let me. It give me pleasure and it is my duty.'
She's a hostess, a bar girl, a waitress, a geisha. She serves.
In Chinese, a feminine for of 'I' means 'slave'. But she is a slave who
enraptures. She is a powerful idea.

Just occasionally, she goes off the rails, and then we get very
upset. She becomes a Madame Mao or a Mrs. Marcos. We worry then; she
could be human after all. There are stories about western men who've
married her, and overnight the waif has metamorphosed into a Dragon
Lady, an oriental princess in love with shopping and food, a strict
monogamaniac. It can't be true (or any more true than the fantasy),
but then it is curious that oriental men seldom boast of the virtues
of oriental wives.
What do they dream in those teeming China nights; where do their
fantasies lie? In the penetration of the lotus, the discovery of the jade,
of silky hair and skin that goes sh-sh-shh at a touch? More likely they
see the mysterious West; those strong abundant women with big breasts,
long legs, yellow hair and eyes round and blue like those of a Siamese
cat. Another sh-sh-shh Shangri-la.

^^ this was published in GQ in 1990

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:26 (twelve years ago)

...

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:38 (twelve years ago)

"giving these dudes a pass for simply 'slotting in' to preexisting structures of oppression is nagl imo"

oh i agree. i'm not arguing that colonial history isn't an issue here (tho really, british colonial history before american, as far as really setting out the stereotypes etc. to begin with -- bear in mind suzie wong is a british novel set in a british colony), but it also seems to me that part of the notions these dudes latch onto are distorted elements of actual differences in gender relations (not positive ones). i mean women in general really do have it way rougher in parts of asia, and there's a culture that valorizes that to a degree (this isn't an argument that 'oh, cultural differences, cool bruv'), and that's certainly part of the picture. we can point to like 'china doll' stuff and whatever in the u.s. but what lots of ppl are into is basically derived from japanese anime, which i don't think is either by and large produced for an audience of americans in america, or americans in u.s. military bases. (so yeah maybe the guys into chinese women vs. the guys into japanese women are quite different in the sorts of things they're fetishizing here and i could be thinking more of the latter?)

also bear in mind that the u.s. has had lots of army bases freaking everywhere, historically. and there are e.g. lots of representations in literature of troops stationed in france going to brothels and prostitutes there and that's part of the sexual represenation of french women in the u.s., but its nothing at all like representations of asian women. and again, latin america. i'll grant that america's military presence throughout asia, due to like war after war, etc. was more protracted and significant than a bunch else in recent memory. but part of it is also maybe not that there are sexual representations of asian women, but that that's like been the _only_ representation for so long? i think there's a huge chunk of people to whom chinese women signify massage parlors, that scene from full metal jacket that 2 live crew sampled, maybe some scene from rush hour or rush hour 2 involving a massage parlor, and perhaps sweet and sour chicken and a gong banging and _nothing else_. so the element of lack of asian immigration to the u.s. for a whole period probably plays a role there? i mean at a certain point if you grow up knowing lots of or even some asian ppl i don't see how you could possibly even begin to have this exoticized view of ppl from that part of the world to begin with.

Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:38 (twelve years ago)

yeah that gq article was weird because it seemed to take for granted that the reader 1.) was not asian and 2.) didn't have a lot of experience with asian people, which today those are an insane things to assume about gq readers.

Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:47 (twelve years ago)

see i don't really like that line of argument at all, locating the source of these negative stereotypes in the culture of asian countries themselves...are you saying that these cultural assumptions then spread out across over the pacific and into the_west and that's the reason why white dudes are into this? nah, doesn't scan bruh. like, there is prob a subset of these dudes who are really into japanese anime... but like, what, is that a necessary condition? i'm pretty confident that the majority of these dudes have never watched anime in their lives! a lot of these bros dont even really make a distinction between chinese, japanese, or korean, dont actively consume asian media, i don't really see it as a necessary condition.

and there's a p simple reason why e.g. perceptions of french women differ from those of asian women, and that's located firmly in the politics of white hegemony? it's p hard for white americans to otherize french women to the same extent that they do to asian women, i think, for obvious reasons.

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:50 (twelve years ago)

Oh, there are definitely people who grew up knowing a fair number of asian people who still end up with the white man/asian woman thing (in that their relationships tend to follow that line, nearly exclusively), but with a different dynamic at play. xxp

Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:50 (twelve years ago)

also i'm gonna out myself as an anime watching nerd, but of the anime i've watched *cough cough*, it's not all submissive representations of women! like, honestly, that's probably the exception rather than the norm. signed, shiroi basket shoes

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:51 (twelve years ago)

i think the submissive asian woman thing doesn't exist as a stereotype anymore except among weird, creepy old people with their minds stuck in the 70s

Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:53 (twelve years ago)

tbf the adults watching anime (especially that targeted at youth in its home country) thing kind of dovetails with the really awkward explanation I've heard that a lot of physical characteristics seen as "asian" code as "youthful" to western eyes. As in, the stereotypical inability of white men to tell how old an asian woman is, combined with an interest in younger women you end up with...

urgh

Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:54 (twelve years ago)

there's also this idea that the asian woman who is submissive, obedient, devoted, etc. is directly opposed to the modern 'western' woman (who codes as white, obv) who is liberated, career-oriented, a feminist. so there's that dynamic at play too, probably the venn diagram between asian fetishists and MRA dudes contains a pretty fat middle.

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:58 (twelve years ago)

also w/r/t point that this derives from the consumption of asian media, there is...virtually no mainland chinese media being consumed in the US at the moment. most of it historicaly has come from HK and taiwan, and that's mostly been of the triad/kung-fu variety which...don't really feature images of submissive chinese/taiwanese women? really, the opposite, there are tons of ass kicking HK female movie stars. w/r/t korean media, there's K-pop, korean movies, and korean soap operas. can't really speak to the movies/soap operas but the depictions of women in k-pop are not really that different than how pop stars are depicted in the US/the west, which is not surprising, given that k-pop is influenced so much by western pop!

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:04 (twelve years ago)

I wonder if the protagonist only dated fobby types, or if that is part of the intrinsic exotic appeal to him. Because that might signify an affinity to a more "traditional" Asian (negative?) stereotype? Is there less exoticism (to him) with an Asian American woman who is 2nd or 3rd generation? Because when I imagine a white guy who only dates Asian women, I stereotype him as someone who really digs some element of authenticism. Not sure if I'm explaining myself well here.

The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:28 (twelve years ago)

protagonist as in the guy in that film? I don't know if he's a "dates only asian women" type as much as a "can't successfully date in the US, shops for wife abroad" type

Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:32 (twelve years ago)

as in he's exclusively looking for a woman in southeast asia because he feels unappreciated at home (lol) and feels the power dynamic at play in finding a wife there is more his speed

Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:34 (twelve years ago)

right he obviously has not been successful shopping for a wife at home, but wonder if he gravitated towards all Asian Americans or just the ones that he perceived as exotic.

The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:36 (twelve years ago)

Those webcam conversations must have been something.

pplains, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:37 (twelve years ago)

a lot of one handed typing, I suspect

The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:39 (twelve years ago)

"can't successfully date in the US, shops for wife abroad"

Based on how most of these dudes develop into ppl who seek out Asian child-brides, it's unlikely that this guy ever seriously considered dating a woman who would have been willing to date him? Typically men who follow this pattern have already decided that any woman of their own age or background isn't good enough for them, and then they feel betrayed by womanhood when "hot" younger women don't take them seriously. Anyway, please go back to being stunned by the odiousness of that GQ article, I don't want to take away from that.

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:58 (twelve years ago)

googling for "tony rivers", writer doesn't turn up a whole lot

goole, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:04 (twelve years ago)

Also, the creepy dude from the documentary specifically mentioned his wife having "good morals". I notice a lot of the guys seeking asian women also mention this because they think western women are too promiscuous. I think they're so insecure that the idea of a woman they're interested in having been with another person is very threatening to them.

The last of the famous international Greyjoys (Nicole), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:05 (twelve years ago)

he might have to date someone who wanted to do stuff other than listen to his long-winded stories and bring him sandwiches

suddenly remembering another way my grandpa is a dick

Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:05 (twelve years ago)

"virtually no mainland chinese media being consumed in the US at the moment"

right i think in part, as i said, we're talking about different segments of ppl being into ppl from different places (altho point about not being able to tell the difference between korea, china, vietnam, etc. among some ppl granted). but i would disagree that k-pop is basically western derivative -- huge portions are, but there's also a kawaii element that's v. much japan derived, and something that i'd imagine (?) plenty of ppl associate with the "east" generally.

something else to bear in mind is that in malaysia, burma etc. under british colonial rule (and i'd guess american in the philippines?) chinese women were considered more 'prized' than women more ethnically local to those regions because precisely of how 'almost white' they were -- all the descriptions of delicate features, porcelain skin, etc.

Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:09 (twelve years ago)

do you have any examples in mind of the kawaii aesthetic in k-pop? not being combative, genuinely curious! i think that there are a fair share of k-pop videos in the high school setting, but i don't really remember them as being kawaii-themed

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:23 (twelve years ago)

speaking from very limited and removed experience, i'd say there is a "thing" of people (men and woman, though it expresses differently) who have not had much success in love in their own culture going outside it where values are different. I knew a set of sisters from a very insular, religious and troubled family who nearly exclusively dated & married men from elsewhere. anecdata i know, but it def looked like trouble getting along in the society around you and still wanting that companionship. the cultural disconnection can kind of mask the personal disconnection, maybe? idk, trying not to sound like a jerk here.

i'm with geebs on being unable to watch even the whole of that preview because of embarrassment reflex. but i don't want to fully remove agency from the young woman -- what set of circumstances and motivations would cause her to sign on that dotted line? security? adventure? lack of 'good men' at home? family pressure? not having a clear idea what she's getting into? it's p baffling to me, honestly! it's crazy to think of these women as being so 'submissive' when the quality that comes through to me is a real fuck-it-all gung ho bravery.

goole, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:27 (twelve years ago)

second part of that is very otm

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:28 (twelve years ago)

well, they did mention the phrase "green card" a few times there, but that might be a bad lead

Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:28 (twelve years ago)

xp and the first part made you grit your teeth in disgust, i get it

goole, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:32 (twelve years ago)

"examples in mind of the kawaii aesthetic in k-pop"

not hugely hugely knowledgeable here so there are probably better examples, but i went thru a couple girls generation videos and found e.g.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dn26KORcgUU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-yT_c8ZL2Y

Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:41 (twelve years ago)

yeah, kawaii doesn't necessarily have to be in a high school setting? just anything that's super-cutesy. One of the big K-pop memes this year is Gwiyomi (aka the Cutie Song).

Roz, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:50 (twelve years ago)

fair enough, I think I've been watching too many miss A videos!

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:09 (twelve years ago)

i guess you could argue that there's a difference between aegyo and kawaii - aegyo as a more... demanding... form of cuteness? (i am trying to remember the whereabouts of a conversation i read online about the differences between aegyo and sajiao, which is sort of relevant)

snapchats and tattoos (c sharp major), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:11 (twelve years ago)

xp and the first part made you grit your teeth in disgust, i get it

― goole, Tuesday, April 23, 2013 11:32 AM (38 minutes ago) Bookmark

haha, not at all! it's just that it feels when these guys do it, it's not so much about cultural values as it is about taking advantage of massive economic disparities between people who live in different countries

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:11 (twelve years ago)

i think you still have to analytically move from cuteness -> submissiveness, if you want to claim that these stereotypes are reinforced or even sourced from the cultures of the countries themselves?

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:12 (twelve years ago)

aha, that aegyo/sajiao discussion: http://maddieloveskpop.tumblr.com/post/42022496537

snapchats and tattoos (c sharp major), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:13 (twelve years ago)

aaaaah i didn't realize that was 撒娇

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:15 (twelve years ago)

is it a valid/commonly used term in Chinese? i was kind of curious about that.

snapchats and tattoos (c sharp major), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:20 (twelve years ago)

yeah for sure

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:21 (twelve years ago)

in cantonese it'd be 嗲

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:22 (twelve years ago)

would you mentally associate it, as a concept, with someone who performed a lot of sajiao? or are they quite distinct to you?

i guess particularly relevant to this discussion are troisroyeaumes' points on aegyo as non-traditional:

My take on the issue is that to actually pull off 애교 requires a level of self-assertiveness that is not in fact a traditional gender norm for Korean women.

In short, 애교 is a gender norm for women, but it’s a relatively modern one. Insofar that it is a norm that sets expectations of “feminine behavior”, it could be called anti-feminist. But I think that’s a facile analysis. I would say it is problematic but I can also see how it can coexist with feminist ideals…it just depends on what those ideals are.

snapchats and tattoos (c sharp major), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:23 (twelve years ago)

hmm, it can definitely be used to describe a person's character. i generally agree that it can co-exist with femininity? but obviously i'm gonna say that with a huge salt shaker in hand as a dude

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:26 (twelve years ago)

i do agree that... it's a pretty active form of participation in a relationship and goal-oriented - not really 'submissive' in the sense of 'i will do whatever my partner tells me to, obediently, quietly.' in fact, it's sort of... the opposite

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:27 (twelve years ago)

i definitely find sajiao easier to understand than aegyo, i guess because i have watched a sufficiency of mainland tv dramas (also, known more princessy mainland-Chinese girls than cutesy Koreans).

But yeah it all seems to exist in the range of being hyper-feminine as a kind of weapon? Which goes from supercute hanging-off-the-arm help-me-it's-so-haaaaaaaaaaard to the super aggressive girly style you still sometimes find among gyaru.

snapchats and tattoos (c sharp major), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:32 (twelve years ago)

yeah... which is the characterization of 'submissiveness' as a trait of being obedient, not talking back, etc. etc. is so... foreign to me, because none of the chinese women i've known (spanning all age groups) is like that at ALL, even when they are performing 撒娇 or 嗲. like, that's why it feels to me that that kind of trope is much more rooted in the history of colonialism/warfare than it is in any innate cultural values, at least ime - obv cant speak for korean/japanese/other asian cultures.

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:36 (twelve years ago)

i guess another way of putting it is that these stereotypes are created and sited in the western mind; and after that, there's probably some kind of confirmation bias going on in the viewing of media from asian countries; like practically anything that is done in media from these countries is gonna be interpreted as being 'evidence' of these stereotypes? short of, idk, ball stomping. the production of gender relations from within the country is very different than how the west conceptualizes those relations, i think. orientalism etc. etc.

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 17:04 (twelve years ago)

there is this sort of minor point i was going to bring up, about "preexisting structures of oppression", which is the super obvious point that different cultures have different structures of oppression?

here's my facile example: until quite recently, in Japan, the loan word "feminisuto" regularly meant "a man who is nice to women, like holding doors for them and stuff". In Japan there is no tradition of that kind of chivalry that's composed of holding doors open for women, carrying their bags, etc. Not that people don't do it, but it's not so deeply ingrained into ordinary gendered behaviour in the way it still is in e.g. the UK (in fact the 'traditional' image of a married couple, you'd see the woman walking behind the man, and also carrying all of the bags). This doesn't mean women in Japan have traditionally been more oppressed -- but it means that holding open a door for a woman, which in Europe is kind of a reference to a history of infantilising and disempowering women, became in Japan something that was nice-to-women in a specifically modern way.

But that seems pretty antiquated wrt modern gender relations now. e.g., again very minor/facile: my mental image of a hetero Japanese couple on a date these days - at any point over the last 15/20 years, i think? - very definitely features the guy carrying her bags.

snapchats and tattoos (c sharp major), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 17:04 (twelve years ago)

hah, that's super interesting

乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 17:06 (twelve years ago)

but but, like you say, i think this thing continues to be sited in the Western mind long after it stops being practicably true: the idea of "Asian" women as a generic class who are more charmed by chivalry, as part of being more authentically feminine.

snapchats and tattoos (c sharp major), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 17:07 (twelve years ago)

oh geez, listening to a david choe interview (LA-based korean-american artist) and he's going on about how he does not recommend anyone dating a korean due to his annoyance with his family's cultural norms

Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 17:26 (twelve years ago)

two months pass...

If you go to the ICA in London, you notice that Japanese girls sometimes seem to be the only people there. I am, in human form, the ICA. I am sustained, like that venerable London arts institution, by the patronage and kindness of these hyper- cultuivated people. I also enjoy fucking them.

― Momus, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (11 years ago)

The pathetic deluded pride that attends ignorance (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Monday, 8 July 2013 21:34 (twelve years ago)

Oh, that's a coincidence! Because I am, in human form, the British houses of parliament during the Opium Wars.

Grampsy, Monday, 8 July 2013 22:24 (twelve years ago)

Meanwhile I'm the human Uffizi gallery, kept alive by people who mainly visit because they feel they ought to, and find the whole thing too hot and uncomfortable and their feet hurt.

cardamon, Tuesday, 9 July 2013 16:44 (twelve years ago)

More seriously, I find it really difficult to parse debates around 'dating etiquette' and the ethics of dating, because I don't move in circles where dating actually happens. But lots of internet acquaintances in the US talk about it a lot.

cardamon, Tuesday, 9 July 2013 16:45 (twelve years ago)

good Momus quote to dig up, cheers Nilmar

mh, Tuesday, 9 July 2013 18:53 (twelve years ago)

I am, in human form, Tucson's rush hour - heavy and slow, and not passing enough water.

pplains, Tuesday, 9 July 2013 18:57 (twelve years ago)

thinking of dating exclusively asian women after the current er indoors tbh

dub job deems (darraghmac), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 20:53 (twelve years ago)

what arts institution are you

the most promising US ilxor has thrown the TOWEL IN (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 21:04 (twelve years ago)

i was looking through a bookmark file of mine from 2005 the other day, was pleased to find that the link to momus' penis still works

http://imomus.com/michaelangelo.jpeg

i wanna be a gabbneb baby (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 21:05 (twelve years ago)

good Momus quote to dig up, cheers Nilmar

― mh, Tuesday, July 9, 2013 2:53 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark

i wanna be a gabbneb baby (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 21:05 (twelve years ago)

i find asian girls typically hugely attractive. but i haven't dated any :(

Does this make me a bastard or not?

― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:05 (5 years ago)

think you might be the amsterdam rijksmuseum, closed down for refurbishment for a number of years but now opening up again

the most promising US ilxor has thrown the TOWEL IN (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 21:06 (twelve years ago)

http://imomus.com/michaelangelo.jpeg

what a wonderful url

Matt P, Tuesday, 9 July 2013 21:24 (twelve years ago)

down to the peg

what a wonderful url (Matt P), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 21:25 (twelve years ago)

five years pass...

Got my yellow fever vaccine on Monday and today I'm down with one nostril constantly running, a migraine, dizziness and slight tingling/numbness of my left foot. These are known but somewhat rare side effects. Committed to going to the doctor tomorrow if I don't feel better when I wake up. To that end I've just had a hella generous hot toddy.

Also there was no CD thread for The Vaccines to post dud in twice. No-one needs to rectify this.

Minister of the Pillow (fionnland), Friday, 10 August 2018 00:20 (seven years ago)

You can start a crossdressing thread fella no one will judge u

F# A# (∞), Friday, 10 August 2018 00:23 (seven years ago)

I got a mmr booster, tetanus booster, hep first round and a yellow fever shot all in one day once and stupidly went out drinking that night. Four double whiskeys later my body was making the craziest sounds while I was puking.

Yerac, Friday, 10 August 2018 01:14 (seven years ago)

U shlda recorded it

F# A# (∞), Friday, 10 August 2018 01:30 (seven years ago)

Probably. I had a roommate at the time that said he heard whistling and woke up.

Yerac, Friday, 10 August 2018 01:41 (seven years ago)

Ha

F# A# (∞), Friday, 10 August 2018 01:43 (seven years ago)

puking after a dozen shots

for i, sock in enumerate (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 10 August 2018 01:58 (seven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.