― felicity, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dean Air, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
But Felicity, you're agreeing with me! The question was: "what do we think of people whose dating habits are based on race classifications" and I all along argued "that's depersonalizing." It's not like anyone injected racialized thinking into the thread: it's the whole topic of the thing, based on that nagging "exclusively" that everyone wants to ignore.
― nabisco, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
However, there are also several other meta-levels and meta-directions of the discussion that have been raised but not developed that much because we're still making sure we all agree on level 1. The issue is not that people are not reading the thread or understanding the primary argument but that some people (I'll speak for myself here) have been beat over the head with the same argument, in exactly the same form -- using the same hackneyed premises and meta-stereotypes -- for so long that the biases and premises underlying the "good" side of the argument begin to become irritating as well. To put it bluntly, at level 2 of the discussion, people who overly concern themselves with WMWEDAW can at times be almost as annoying as the WMWEDAW themselves, and for similar reasons. Here are some of my theories why.
1. Yes, there are Asian woman fetishes and negative Asian woman stereotypes. But having these types of debates tends to focus attention on a particular East Asian woman stereotype to the exclusion of other stereotypes. People rarely seem to say "He has a thing for Asian girls because they are grasping and cunning and fixated on career achievement" or "He has a thing for Asian girls because they are materialistic and superficial and abnormally acquisitive of Louis Vuitton luxury goods" or "He has a thing for Asian girls, what with those saris and those caste marks and that spicy curry rowr" -- it always seems to be the same quailing, lotus- blossum stereotype that is trotted out for criticism. So the overwhelming consistency of the example stereotype reinforces the overall tendency to make racial generalizations and does more harm than good, notwithstanding the well-meaning intention to denounce people projecting the stereotype onto their date-ees. It's like repeating the racist joke in the memo saying "Mr. X was recently terminated from his job in this company for telling the following inappropriate joke: [racist joke]."
2. Perhaps I am imagining it, but there is an idea that I'm having trouble forming and expressing that goes generally like this: there is either a disproportionate amount of concern about WMWEDAW or that it somehow seems more acceptable for people to dissect the WMWEDAW phenomenon than it would be for people to dissect the phenomenon of of [whatever race][whatever gender]WED[non-Asian female-whatever]. I think the reason I'm having this idea has to do with the stereotype (to which Joy alluded) of Asian women as unable to choose, think or fend for themselves against the rapacious, non-Asian man, as well as exploiting the general Asian "model minority" stereotype of not making trouble, don't rock the boat, etc. I know that people would say they hold the same views with respect to men "preying" on other racial classifications of women, but they DON'T. Perhaps I would feel better if I saw some alternate threads for the other racial fetishes and that everyone contributed their strong viewpoints on those race phenomena as well. Perhaps I wouldn't. Like I said, perhaps I am imagining it.
3. The decision to define a category as [X] (in this case "Asian") and then to keep harping on a person's membership in category [X], even in a well-meaning way, is depersonalizing. For some reason it seems that the continent-of- origin level of classification is the only thing that is troubling. For example, I seem to be getting the idea that there is something equally sinister about (a) a man who dates a 1st-generation Vietnamese woman, a second-generation Korean-American woman, a Laotian refugee, and a Japanese surfer girl (since there seems to have been an unstated premise that on this thread Asian = East Asian) and (b) a man who dates a series of four Cantonese Chinese women named Emily with size-2 feet because in both (a) and (b) the man is ED"A"W. I think it might be interesting to question why this particular classification has been chosen. For example, Korean and Japanese people don't always exactly get along -- why does it make sense to talk about them in the same dating profile? If we want to talk about dating the phenotype, fine, let's talk about that, but the "Asian" label is kind of frustrating.
4. I think you can get on thin ice in general when forming generalizations based on your own, individualized experiences and then projecting the attendant conclusion-theories onto others (<== like there, see?). Nitsuh (and Dan, since you also seem to have something to say), feel free to contribute your own (what? "inter-racial"? -ugh) dating experiences and thoughts, and see where there are differences and commonalities among us. It's easier to see people as individuals that way, which is what I like best about ILE. However, please do not presume that your experience/views on racial calssifications = mine = my parents (I shuddered when I read "in extreme cases marriage" on that January 30 post).
Besides that, I would like to point out that I actually quite like Balthus.
― felicity, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
That said, I do see your complaints, only I on some level want to dodge them here, insofar as it wasn't me who introduced the topic or even started off trying to frame it in a certain sense -- or even limited it to Asian women, insofar as my first post on this thread was intended to point out how much I dislike the same phenomenon when it's directed at black males. In which situation I'd still take all of your points above and yet still make the same sorts of arguments that I've been making on this thread.
I can see how (1) functions -- e.g. in the case of Fritz's friends making "yellow fever" cracks, most likely jumping to that stereotype in the absence of any evidence to support it, thereby promoting the stereotypes themselves -- but I don't think that's nearly the same thing as pointing out that a great deal of let's say Americans with race-based dating criteria (whether directed at Asian women or black men or Latinos / Latinas or anyone else) really are working off of a dominant stereotype, and even the one that's least realistic, so far as current possible Asian-woman stereotypes go. I don't see how pointing this out in any sense reinforces it, so long as one isn't automatically jumping to the conclusion that that's the case whenever one sees a white man and an Asian woman together. By the same token, I'd be annoyed if anyone looked at me with a white date and immediately assumed that I must have a huge dick and treat her terribly. (The former would be slightly less annoying, but still.)
As for (2), like I said, my first post was to make an equivalent comparison with the races changed and the gender reversed. Also (a) I don't think of myself as terribly concerned with this phenomenon -- to be honest, I don't believe I'd ever given it much thought before this thread -- plus (b) my image in this scenario is actually of a whole lot of Asian women getting constantly bothered by stereotype- seeking white men, and either figuring out that hidden motivation down the line or seeing it straight-off and telling the guy to get lost.
As for (3), that again was my whole argument from above: that a great number of the white men who exclusively date (East) Asian women make absolutely no distinctions between the various bits of that entire section of the continent, which is part of the reason I repeatedly told Momus (whose attraction is a specifically cultural one with Japan) that the segment of the WMWEDAW contingent I was criticizing had little-to-nothing to do with him. In that sense the "frustrating classification" is a creation of a particular and not-insignificant subgroup of the WMWEDAW group -- and you cannot tell me there aren't plenty of guys out there whose "exclusive" attraction to East Asian women extends without distinction from Japan through Thailand.
The reason I've said "I think we all agree" above is that no one is really disputing that there is this "bad" type of stereotype-driven fetishistic race-based dating, and apart from that there are loads upon loads of people having perfectly lovely relationships with people of other races, and also perfectly-fine cultural inclinations or aesthetic whatevers to particular other races (I can't claim to have ever had a relationship that wasn't in the second category). Where the disagreement begins is around (a) what the proportions are of the former to the latter, and (b) how useful or helpful it is to point up the "bad" side of the former. I keep coming back to this thread because I want to make absolutely clear how little I like the idea of people tending to assume that all interracial dating revolves around the fetishes and the stereotypes -- if there's any point of view mentioned in this thread that annoys me most, it's that of those who would make "yellow fever" comments to Fritz for dating an Asian woman (or, like I said, anyone who would make "jungle fever" comments about my girlfriend). And no, I don't think it's helpful to go around being skeptical of people simply for often dating people of a particular other race, which is just a lite version of what I'm complaining about in the previous sentence. The only reason I've taken the stance I have here is the word "exclusively" in the thread title, which points to a guy who programmatically seeks Asian women to date -- despite all of the vast variation in that incredibly huge group. If we consider this in an American sense, or a Western-metropolitan sense, we have to conclude that such a person is either (a) stereotyping to somehow connect Chinese immigrants with fourth-generation Japanese girls, or (b) working with phenotypic aesthetics, which is not ethically reprehensible but still incredibly shallow.
As for how we'd relate this to other genders and races, in the US the main proponents of dating "exclusively" based on race tend to be white racists, don't they? ("You will exclusively date other white people.") And so at root what I'm arguing with here is the idea that in a place like the US race, of all things -- especially in as broad a sense as "Asian" -- should be anything near a primary "exclusive" factor in who a person dates. And that's really all I'm saying: not that we should be overly suspicious of everyone's reasons for dating who they do, not that we should always assume certain stereotypes are always in operation, not that we should create some new stereotype around white men dating Asian women, not that the WMWEDAW phenomenon deserves a lot of negative attention either way. Just that basing dating on race to the point of "exclusion" is dud, dud, dud.
― nabisco, Monday, 22 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
p.s. Nitsuh, you owe me a call
-- I have free Cubs tickets for the rest of the week. And damn, you
can type fast.
― felicity, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― felicity, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
By the way, I just tried to IM you and then you disappeared. I was going to tell you that I've finally cleaned up around here, including music-organization, so now you can come borrow stuff from me to accompany you through the more studious bits of the next week.
― nabisco, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― toraneko, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― toraneko, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― michael, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― felicity, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Why is "working with phenotypic aesthetics" incredibly shallow? Isn't that just code for "having physical preferences and acting on them"? A sizeable proportion of the population has a single, physical "ur-type" in their sexual subconscious, one that creates a more consistently powerful response in them than any other. If they know that's what they find most satisfying, I have a hard time thinking ill of them for pursuing it just because their ur-type takes shape along ethnic/racial lines. It may seem silly or narrow of them to focus so single-mindedly on a particular type, but I can't see it as impeachable, particularly if they've explored the alternatives and found them less satisfying. Romantic relationships are, after all, interactions of body and soul, and even the best-intentioned one will founder if it's not predicated on mutual attraction on both fronts. If we acknowledge that it's possible to have phenotypic preferences that aren't predicated on cultural stereotyping, and if we're going to criticize Caucasian men who know the Asian female phenotype is what they want -- or Caucasian women who feel the same way about the African/African-American male phenotype, or vice versa -- then how is that different from criticizing people for exclusively pursuing people with luminous eyes, or small breasts, or hairy chests, or whatever? Why shouldn't people pursue what turns them on the most, assuming they're capable of being turned on in a way that acknowledges their partner's humanity?
in the US the main proponents of dating "exclusively" based on race tend to be white racists, don't they?
I'd be far more inclined to give that mantle to first-generation immigrants. Certainly a very high proportion of people I've known, especially women, whose parents emigrated from China/Japan/Korea/etc. have come under pressure from their parents to exclusively date people from said country. Granted, that's partly a cultural issue, but still -- how is that particularly different from Caucasian families wanting their kids to marry Caucasians? Or African-Americans who want their children to exclusively be involved with African-Americans -- and would rather see them involved with an African immigrant than a Caucasian Jew?
― Phil, Tuesday, 23 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Of course this depends on how successful you are with the opposite sex: I suppose you could be so outrageously desirable and have so many lovely dating options that you can be that way about visual ideals.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 24 July 2002 00:00 (twenty-three years ago)
― , Saturday, 5 October 2002 15:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― toraneko (toraneko), Saturday, 5 October 2002 16:26 (twenty-two years ago)
I can remember Momus being in a tabloid. A big centre-pages spread in lamentable Scottish paper the Daily Record a few years ago. I can't remember the details exactly, but the story/interview was connected to his marriage (to an asian woman), rather than about music. I found it odd to see Momus in the Daily Record then, when I was only vaguely aware of his work. After reading some of his messages here (on this site, I mean, rather than this thread), I find it odder still.
― Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Sunday, 6 October 2002 14:24 (twenty-two years ago)
only bits of it....
and many russians would disagree (hoping to ignore siberia as just this...thing, y'know)
and momus goes to colonsay! its a very nice island. did you stay in the hotel momus?
― ambrose (ambrose), Sunday, 6 October 2002 16:19 (twenty-two years ago)
I don't share your feeling that such preferences are "slightly disagreeable." Furthermore, I think I'd be happy if someone was sexually attracted to me based on fairly superficial aspects of my appearance over which I have no real control. I actually think it would be nice to be appreciated on that level. Of course, I admit that after a time, if a relationship developed, I would hope that the person would come around to seeing more of who I am.
I feel a bit defensive on this topic since though I am not attracted rigidly to one type, I do have my types, and over time I will go through certain phases. At one time I was particularly attracted to Asian women (though not nearly as successful in the pursuit as Momus apparently has been), primarily, I think, for aesthetic reasons. (For what it's worth: no, I was definitely not looking for some ultra-submissive geisha fantasy.) Since then, I have become rather taken with Latinas and Russian women and Indians (not the sort of Asian I was particularly attracted to previously). I have a long-standing very strong preference for brown-eyed brunettes.
Honestly, I am made a little uncomfortable by the fact that I have never really been attracted to black women (or at any rate women I perceive as black--as chance would have it, I am currently dating someone who considers herself black, though I didn't see her that way when I met her). (I have to further qualify this by saying that some North African women have been an exception, including Ethiopians. lol.) Is it just a coincidence that the one race whose females don't appeal to me happens to be the one which has traditionally been perceived in the worst light by white Americans? Probably not. At the same time, I don't think that such preferences operate at a level where they can easily be modified. I think my preference in this case is probably shaped by racist or prejudiced currents in my society, but I don't see it as something I really need to correct. Black women can surely get by without me. If it is racism, it is racism on a fairly unconscious level. As I said, I now know that the person I just started to date is black. If I had some sort of conscious racist ideology, I would presumably stop dating her at this point. (Ironically, I have been somewhat worried that she does not fit my brown-eyed, dark-haired preference.)
― Rockist Scient, Sunday, 6 October 2002 16:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Sunday, 6 October 2002 17:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 31 October 2002 03:27 (twenty-two years ago)
Scottish Lips
Because I have Scottish lips
You think you can tell me you love me
Because I have Scottish lips
You are listening hard to your glands
Because I have Scottish lips
You are dancing a fling in your knickers
Your love for my Scottish lips
Knows no bounds
It's the love that is known
The love that is known to baboons
Don't love me for my Scottish lips
But my truffles and my baklava
Grilled eggplant, delicious mint salsa
Love me for my cooking!
Don't be stupid, I'm joking
I'm only joking
Get lost if you tell me you love me
When it's all for my Scottish lips
Why don't you tell me you love me for stuff
That's a bit more important than this
Tell me you love me in spirit
Tell me you love me in soul
Or you love me in mind
Even if it's a lie
And when I reply
Look me deep in the eye
Or at least try to look the other way
Just make sure your gaze never slips
Down to my Scottish lips
― Momus (Momus), Thursday, 31 October 2002 05:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 31 October 2002 21:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 31 October 2002 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Friday, 1 November 2002 02:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― g (graysonlane), Tuesday, 5 November 2002 20:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 03:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― toraneko (toraneko), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 11:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― g (graysonlane), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 16:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― felicity (felicity), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 16:40 (twenty-two years ago)
(It's starting to catch up to me a little too, but oddly enough I now seem to be more attractive to women than I was a couple years ago when I was 20 lb. lighter.)
― RS, Wednesday, 6 November 2002 16:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― g (graysonlane), Wednesday, 6 November 2002 23:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Carey (Carey), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ricardo (RickyT), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)
(What is a "woman pindick" [and can we eat it]?)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tep (ktepi), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― felicity (felicity), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 13:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― _, Monday, 10 October 2005 11:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Monday, 10 October 2005 11:34 (nineteen years ago)
-- Momus (nic...), January 31st, 2002.
what bollocks of generalization, as most people who know real japanese people, as opposed to art sceney japanese, will know. i have a japanese woman friend who is a huge soccer fan (much to my initial surprise, almost horror) to the point where she went to most of Euro 2004 and wrote about the matches for a japanese sports paper. and she's not pretty, demure, cute, sweet, just a nice person
― toodly, Monday, 10 October 2005 12:32 (nineteen years ago)
― mickey raft (mickeygraft), Monday, 10 October 2005 13:38 (nineteen years ago)
Rockist!
― Momus (Momus), Monday, 10 October 2005 14:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Jimmy Mod wants you to tighten the strings on your corset (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Monday, 10 October 2005 14:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Laura H. (laurah), Monday, 10 October 2005 18:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Lovelace (Lovelace), Monday, 10 October 2005 22:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Jonothong Williamsmang (ex machina), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 16:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Jonothong Williamsmang (ex machina), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 16:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Dickset! Dickset! Disckset! (jaxon), Tuesday, 11 October 2005 16:49 (nineteen years ago)
i know its not the post title and i might have missed out a whole load of comments (this thread is very very long - clearly WMWDAW is a burning topic in the hearts of many) but this post doesnt have enough discussion about what the asian girls in these relationships think about all this.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 11:43 (eighteen years ago)
Are they allowed opinions?
― Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 11:47 (eighteen years ago)
"this post doesnt have enough discussion about what the asian girls in these relationships think about all this"
true
this thread, on the other hand, could be a whole different kettle of fish
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 31 August 2007 11:51 (eighteen years ago)
more asian babes on ile plz
― blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 11:55 (eighteen years ago)
i find asian girls typically hugely attractive. but i haven't dated any :(
Does this make me a bastard or not?
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:05 (eighteen years ago)
A cowardly bastard maybe
― Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 12:07 (eighteen years ago)
asian girls typically support martin jol
― blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:08 (eighteen years ago)
"Does this make me a bastard or not?"
no, it makes you a likely peruser of asian porn.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:09 (eighteen years ago)
"this thread, on the other hand, could be a whole different kettle of fish"
im surprised there is no 'Asian Women Who Exclusively Date White Men' thread.
"Are they allowed opinions?"
theyre not allowed to answer that.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:10 (eighteen years ago)
"managers exclusively supported by asian women"
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:13 (eighteen years ago)
you people are revolting
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:24 (eighteen years ago)
Got out the wrong side of the bed this morning?
― Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 12:25 (eighteen years ago)
"you people are revolting"
men, or asians?
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:26 (eighteen years ago)
"you people are revolting"
who? i dont think i said anything revolting.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:27 (eighteen years ago)
in you're interested in this topic you could try reading the thread, which is a good one, rather than cracking jokes about how asian girls are all meek and subservient
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:29 (eighteen years ago)
Jawohl
― Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 12:30 (eighteen years ago)
I could ask a few friends/our employee. She's Japanese, like some of my friends, who are married to caucasians. Actually, I take that back, the majority of these couples are already divorced. Our employee is the only one of two couples I know that are still together, the rest is divorced/seperated.
― nathalie, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:31 (eighteen years ago)
hey! i didnt crack any jokes about that. my first comment was that i genuinely thought there was something missing from this thread as there didnt seem to be much from the POV of the asian girls in these relationships (maybe i just missed it? but then, thats not what the post title was about, although as they are part of the relationships i thought there should be something from their perspective). i did say "theyre not allowed to answer that" but i meant that sarcastically.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:34 (eighteen years ago)
if you didn't mean it sarcastically it wouldn't be a "joke"
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:35 (eighteen years ago)
in all fairness you people are revolting is a good bet for pretty much any thread around here
― jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:39 (eighteen years ago)
I think "you people are sarcastic" would have been kinder
― Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 12:40 (eighteen years ago)
well FWIW, as an asian man, albeit of south asian descent (hooray for race-outing on the net!), rather than north (although south asian women do tend to be viewed in a similarly demure/subservient etc way), ill just say that is *not* what i think at all (that asian women are all meek and subservient). and i dont see how one pithy sarcastic comment means that that IS what i think.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:46 (eighteen years ago)
i was just being sarcastic
― jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:48 (eighteen years ago)
Is the Indian subcontinent really South Asian?
― Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 12:48 (eighteen years ago)
yes it IS really south asian. why wouldnt it be?
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:49 (eighteen years ago)
yah
― jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:50 (eighteen years ago)
Is the Momus on this thread the same as the Momus who was some sort of popstar in the eighties?
― Zelda Zonk, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:51 (eighteen years ago)
lol
― jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:51 (eighteen years ago)
I suppose it is, Indonesia is South Asian, Japan and China aren't really "North Asian" but you can't say Central Asian because of, errrrrrrrrr, Central Asia
― Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 12:52 (eighteen years ago)
"I could ask a few friends/our employee."
do a census.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:53 (eighteen years ago)
lol
Is that a no then?
― Zelda Zonk, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:53 (eighteen years ago)
south asia refers to the indian subcontinent and surrounding islands
― jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:54 (eighteen years ago)
THAT IS TEH MOMUS
― jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:54 (eighteen years ago)
"in you're interested in this topic you could try reading the thread, which is a good one, rather than cracking jokes about how asian girls are all meek and subservient"
ok, people are attracted to other people, sometimes to very specific types of other people. apparently, other people are allowed to have a problem with this (for reasons that are frankly quite unclear to me), and post about it. but nobody is allowed to make joeks IS TAHT CLEAR?
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:55 (eighteen years ago)
"I suppose it is, Indonesia is South Asian, Japan and China aren't really "North Asian" but you can't say Central Asian because of, errrrrrrrrr, Central Asia"
well just look on a map. its pretty obvious that india and pakistan are south asia. you could maybe call china east asia.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:55 (eighteen years ago)
well not 'you could maybe call china east asia', you DO call china east asia!
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:57 (eighteen years ago)
more jokes please. come on, it's the weekend!
― blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:59 (eighteen years ago)
It's confused 'cos British people generally mean India/Pakistan when they say "Asian"
― Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 12:59 (eighteen years ago)
in the US, asian means south asia, ie the indian subcontinent. in the US, asian means east asia, ie china, japan, korea, etc.
i thought everyone knew this. or are you just trying to get a rise?
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:03 (eighteen years ago)
<i>im surprised there is no 'Asian Women Who Exclusively Date White Men' thread.</i>
serious albeit anecdotal answer: my best friend has this stance because she thinks asian guys are too traditional and won't put up with her outspoken feminism. of course, she also is really disgusted by white men who fetishize asian women for the same reasons. (also, apparently the ones who are cowardly in person about admitting it come out in force on facebook).
― Maria, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:04 (eighteen years ago)
well not 'you could maybe call china east asia', you DO call china east asia!
The Far East or Far Eastern!
― Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 13:05 (eighteen years ago)
i suppose my more general point being that in the groups "white men who exclusively date asian women," and "asian women who exclusively date white men," the men and women are not the same set. you're looking for opinions from "asian women who exclusively date white men who exclusively date asian women." (xpost)
― Maria, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:06 (eighteen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Asia
― jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:09 (eighteen years ago)
Iran!
― Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 13:09 (eighteen years ago)
why not a thread on white men who exclusively date women, and their reasons for doing so?
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:12 (eighteen years ago)
The United Nations further includes Iran as part of Southern Asia
― jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:12 (eighteen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Asia
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:13 (eighteen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southeast_Asia
― jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:14 (eighteen years ago)
East Asia and Eastern Asia (the latter form preferred by the United Nations) are both more modern terms for the traditional European name the Far East
Which is why, being European, the Far East is more common
― Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 13:15 (eighteen years ago)
"why not a thread on white men who exclusively date women, and their reasons for doing so?"
yes, all discussion of race should be nixed wherever possible!
'far east' sounds very old school and antiquated.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:15 (eighteen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Men_Who_Exclusively_Date_Asian_Women
― jhøshea, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:16 (eighteen years ago)
Yet Middle East isn't! (xp)
― Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 13:17 (eighteen years ago)
did they ever say 'the far west' in 'the far east'. 'up west' would've been better ala eastenders.
― blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:17 (eighteen years ago)
tom d, please go away.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:18 (eighteen years ago)
No
― Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 13:18 (eighteen years ago)
tom d is from the far north
― blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:18 (eighteen years ago)
"yes, all discussion of race should be nixed wherever possible!
not my point at all. as well have a thread about black men who exclusively date women, if you like.
or white men who exclusively date black men, if you wanna mix it. i can't see the relevance, nor why it's an issue for other people, let alone a 400 post thread that apparently is too serious to make anything other than po-faced sub-psych 101 comment on.
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:38 (eighteen years ago)
I actually asked a friend of mine about this a while back. She said she would not want to date a white guy who exclusively dates asian women, and she thinks it's kind of racist to say you prefer one race. So there's one asian woman's opinion for you.
― jessie monster, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)
black men who exclusively date women, if you like.
― Colonel Poo, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:57 (eighteen years ago)
I'm immediately regretting posting that.
― Colonel Poo, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:57 (eighteen years ago)
It's confused 'cos British people generally mean India/Pakistan when they say "Asian"
-- Tom D., Friday, August 31, 2007 1:59 PM (58 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
apparently this is a result of civil service designation of immigrants (into africa rather than the uk) in the 40s and 50s.
the stereotype referred to in this thread is, i think, asian in the american sense, coz iirc this was a 'zing momus' thread.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:03 (eighteen years ago)
the stereotype referred to in this thread is, i think, asian in the american sense, coz iirc this was a 'zing momus' thread.
I am aware of this!
― Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 14:05 (eighteen years ago)
i'm not even sure these mythical 'won't date outside of a particular race' people exist.
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:09 (eighteen years ago)
um, except where it's their own race, on reflection. i'm aware there are plenty of those.
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:10 (eighteen years ago)
My husband is English so in the past year and a half we've dealt with a lot of immigration issues that led me to a message board about Americans who were marrying non US citizens. There were tons of many creepy men on there who had met their fiances on websites that were pretty much mail order bride type things. Some even posted about how Asian women were better because they knew how to listen and serve a man and they kept themselves in better shape than American women. Many (not all, of cof them did exclusively date or at least seek out Asian women for these reasons. It was pretty much disgusting.
― ENBB, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:24 (eighteen years ago)
kinda more of a 'pervs on internet who import asian women' thread then, really?
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:45 (eighteen years ago)
the amount of American women i know married to English men is totally disproportionate to the number of American men i know married to English women.
― blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:53 (eighteen years ago)
it's like 8-0
― blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:53 (eighteen years ago)
It must be that American women are more submissive...........................
― Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 14:54 (eighteen years ago)
no, it's that american women are bastards i think....
i may be getting this thread all rong.
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:54 (eighteen years ago)
I too wish to marry at least one American woman
― blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:55 (eighteen years ago)
American men do not marry English women. Story of my life, really.
These people do exist, not just on internet creep forums. Two of my ex boyfriends were... well, obviously both of them dated me, so it wasn't exclusively Asian women, but there was a decided preference.
― Masonic Boom, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)
the amount of American women i know married to English men is totally disproportionate to the number of American men i know married to English women.
― Colonel Poo, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:01 (eighteen years ago)
point being, again, that there are people (not just white men) that have preferences. i'm not seeing where this is an issue for a concerned focus group formation.
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:02 (eighteen years ago)
the amount of American women i know married to English men is totally disproportionate to the number of American men i know married to English women
That's interesting. I do know a couple other American woman/English man couples but only one American man/English woman couple. I wonder why.
― ENBB, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:06 (eighteen years ago)
I'm thinking it reflects badly on American men
― Tom D., Friday, 31 August 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)
DOESN'T EVERYTHING?
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:16 (eighteen years ago)
i know quite a few people that choose to date pretty much exclusively a certain racial group other than their own. maybe its cos they dont get approached by the opp sex in their own racial group or maybe its just that theyre not attracted to them and associate certain things with the group they do date. but either way, they do have a pretty strict unbending preference.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:16 (eighteen years ago)
So, why aren't the Asian women who would date all this white men seen as creepy?
― Bob Standard, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:18 (eighteen years ago)
allowing that, titchy, i'm not seeing why the subsets mentioned in this thread are in line for such a kicking.
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:22 (eighteen years ago)
or, more explicitly, the white men mentioned in this thread.
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:23 (eighteen years ago)
ENBB all but one of them met because the American woman was a big fan of British indie-pop. I mean to the friendly observer that is the clear connection between them all, which is fair dos at the end of the day.
― blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)
Actually make that all but two.
― blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:27 (eighteen years ago)
HA! You could probably add me to that list because that was the first thing that L and I ever talked about.
― ENBB, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)
OMG.
I am a statistic.
― Colonel Poo, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)
There is no shame in it at all.
― blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:29 (eighteen years ago)
I think at one point on Sinister it was 12-0 (I am indeed one of the 12 - does the mere fact Sinister was involved mean British indie-pop was the catalyst by definition?).
― Mark C, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:41 (eighteen years ago)
Aren't there a couple american dudes married to english chicks on the board? Like, other than Colonel Poo.
So, why aren't the Asian women who would date all this white men seen as creepy?
-- Bob Standard, Friday, August 31, 2007 11:18 AM (Friday, August 31, 2007 11:18 AM) Bookmark Link
Actually I've heard them vilified by other women as gold diggers, etc.
― jessie monster, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:42 (eighteen years ago)
I wish I'd known these stats when I decided to spend my marriagble aged years in the States. ::weeps bitter tears::
― Masonic Boom, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)
Colonel Poo is an English guy married to American woman tho...unless I'm confused.
Alex In NYC married an Englishwoman I believe.
― blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)
but Alex In NYC is really from Tyneside - just don't tell anyone
― blueski, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)
theres actually tons of articles on this subject on the net (predictably). this one below, despite the shitty layout, has some good points. points 5, 6 and 8 are worth reading IMO.
http://modelminority.com/article113.html
eg - "So I have little patience for people who say "I just find X attractive; it's like ice cream flavors." People are NOT ice cream. I only ask that you ask yourself WHY you find attractive what you find attractive."
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)
lol gygax
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:52 (eighteen years ago)
xpost
and i only ask WHY it matters? is attraction something we have a duty to question ourselves on?
Should we be policing our attraction in case it offends others for reasons inside their own heads?
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:53 (eighteen years ago)
well, bryan says:
"It wouldn't bother me as much if Asian women were also dating black men or Latino men," Bryan says. "But it's white guys. I've heard Asian women say they only date white guys. And it's because we live in a white culture. They do it for status. It's self-contempt."
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:59 (eighteen years ago)
well, if bryan says it then i guess it's so.
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:02 (eighteen years ago)
eg - "So I have little patience for people who say "I just find X attractive; it's like ice cream flavors." People are NOT ice cream. I only ask that you ask yourself WHY you find attractive what you find attractive."
Oh noes, are you trying to tell me I should be looking at males other than DDBs because I've internalised the idea that all DDBs are stupid and drugged up, and therefore more willing to let me push them around?
;-)
Seriously, I haven't re-read the above thread, but my memory of it was, it was a lot of people over-exaggeratedly giving Momus hassle for very specific reasons that have more to do with him being, well... him than anything else.
However, stereotypes which are backed up with statistical evidence are worth investigating, for all the reasons explained in that linked article. It's as interesting from a gender based perspective as a racism-based perspective. Why do these common trans-culture pairings (Asian Woman-White male, British Man-American woman) not happen equally across the genders?
― Masonic Boom, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:03 (eighteen years ago)
most of the asian men i know exclusively date asian women, too.
― Maria, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:04 (eighteen years ago)
i really dont see how a british-american white couple is the same thing as a asian-white couple.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:05 (eighteen years ago)
It's similar because the relationships only go one way across gender lines. Which makes me wonder if there's a similar dynamic at work. Maybe not. But it's worth discussing.
― Masonic Boom, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:08 (eighteen years ago)
i know at least three asian women who used to exclusively date white guys but have gone back to dating only asian guys...mostly they just got fed up with the W.M.W.E.D.A.W., often after dating a string of particularly terrible momus-types who don't treat them as unique or individual but as a fetish or sexual preference. then again i know plenty of white guy - asian woman couples where this is not the case, but the guys in question were not serial type daters in the first place.
any serial type dating seems like trouble, racial or otherwise.
― bell_labs, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:31 (eighteen years ago)
exclusively dating on any trait is bad news, can we just leave it at that?
oh, and men are bastards
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:33 (eighteen years ago)
Well that only took five years.
― Laurel, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:34 (eighteen years ago)
Exclusively dating any ethnicity seems pretty stupid. I always figure my dating chances are pretty slim as is! That said, Asian girls can be pretty cute. My parents on the other hand, are still holding out hope for a nice jewish girl.
-- bnw, Tuesday, January 29, 2002 1:00 AM (5 years ago) Bookmark Link
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:35 (eighteen years ago)
I'm too tired to read Kate's posts but I assume we should ban her right?
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:39 (eighteen years ago)
i only date girls with big asses. I've tried to date others, but it just didn't work out. I'm like a size queen. about asses.
― will, Friday, 31 August 2007 19:19 (eighteen years ago)
So about next Friday....
― Laurel, Friday, 31 August 2007 20:14 (eighteen years ago)
I dated an asian girl that had a mighty ass.
she hated it. and that made me sad :(
― The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Friday, 31 August 2007 20:37 (eighteen years ago)
So about next Friday....
next friday and every friday is set aside for spending time in the company of ladies with big asses. it's what I do. come join us on our big-ass adventure.
― will, Friday, 31 August 2007 21:37 (eighteen years ago)
What about, "Gentlemen Prefer Blondes", racist movie?
― Heave Ho, Friday, 31 August 2007 21:39 (eighteen years ago)
Joeks. Boyfriend wd not approve, I suspect.
― Laurel, Friday, 31 August 2007 21:58 (eighteen years ago)
i only date girls with big asses. I've tried to date others, but it just didn't work out. I'm like a size queen. about asses.
-- will, Friday, August 31, 2007 2:19 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link
otm
― deej, Friday, 31 August 2007 22:01 (eighteen years ago)
i also have a tendency to date dancers
― deej, Friday, 31 August 2007 22:01 (eighteen years ago)
"dancers"
― Jordan, Friday, 31 August 2007 22:06 (eighteen years ago)
lol exoticizing exotic dancers?
― deej, Friday, 31 August 2007 22:08 (eighteen years ago)
ha
― Jordan, Friday, 31 August 2007 22:11 (eighteen years ago)
in the US, asian means south asia, ie the indian subcontinent. in the US, asian means east asia, ie china, japan, korea, etc.
i thought everyone knew this. or are you just trying to get a rise?
Least helpful explanation ever?
― HI DERE, Saturday, 1 September 2007 01:34 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.qwantz.com/comics/comic2-710.png
― Nathan, Saturday, 1 September 2007 04:35 (eighteen years ago)
Who are the American-English couples on ILX? Mark C/sgs, Colette/Toby, Adamrl/Sarah, who else?
― jaymc, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:47 (eighteen years ago)
the Lex/Paris Hilton
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)
me/my husband who won't tell me his username
― ENBB, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)
(I was going to do a drawn-out "Paris Hilton is Nude Spock" joke; it is for the best I got xposted before I could figure out how to get to the punchline.)
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/33544275@N00/1323347199/
― brownie, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:55 (eighteen years ago)
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1100/1323347199_41b4172d46_o.jpg
― brownie, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 20:58 (eighteen years ago)
There is a nomnom gorgeous, funny Japanese boy in one of my classes who I would exclusively date were I not exclusively dating a wonderful man who I already love. It is hell of fun to idle flirt with this cuets man, tho.
― Abbott, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:18 (eighteen years ago)
darraghmac, you are a treat on this thread.
― kv_nol, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:22 (eighteen years ago)
A bad scan of the New Answers page made me accidentally read "White Men Who Exclusively Date Ethiopian Food"
― nabisco, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:23 (eighteen years ago)
Which, you know, you could do worse.
― nabisco, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:24 (eighteen years ago)
"Judging by the smell, I'm guessing these leftovers are from late June."
― jaymc, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:41 (eighteen years ago)
"my wife's been having an affair with some ethiopian food"
"injera?"
"i'll bloody well kill her!"
― blueski, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:45 (eighteen years ago)
Steve, you're setting someone up for a terrible "wat's on first" routine.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:49 (eighteen years ago)
Unless you want to call tibs on it yourself.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 22:49 (eighteen years ago)
Ibe created a monster.
― nabisco, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 23:00 (eighteen years ago)
I dated a Chinese girl for two years. To this day, I find Asian girls who resemble her EXTREMELY attractive.
Other than that, I find a whole lot of women attractive.
Especially those with asses. mmmmmmMMMM!!!!
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 5 September 2007 01:59 (eighteen years ago)
For what it's worth, I'm still exclusively dating the same Asian woman I mentioned in this thread years ago. We've been together about ten years now, married for 3, and we have a beautiful, sweet 1 year old kid.
I've met lots of non-Asian guys with Japanese wives and girlfriends over the years, mostly guys who are dating my wife's Japanese friends. Marriage and serial dating are different things, but I have to say these guys don't really fit a type (other than that they are the type of guy likely to be dating/married to a friend of my wife e.g. generally pretty nice funny guys though of course the occasional scoundrel and/or rogue slips in). I've also met a few Japanese guys with non-Japanese girlfriends or wives, but it isn't as common.
There are some common problems in this type of cross-cultural relationship that I've witnessed and experienced - some different ideas about how to run a house or raise a kid, some difficulty communicating sometimes - but I can't say if those problems might be just as prevelant in any couple made up of people from extremely different backgrounds. I expect they would be. Most of our fights are about the usual things: money, laundry, dishes, whatever.
The ex-pat guys I've met in Japan seem to me to have more common traits than N. American Non-Asian dudes dating Japanese women - but I shouldn't generalize because I haven't spent as much time with them.
Not sure if that adds anything to the discussion.
― fritz, Wednesday, 5 September 2007 15:11 (eighteen years ago)
I recently went to a bachelor party in which I was the only asian. I was talking with a group of 3 other guys and we somehow realized that all 4 of us had asian girlfriends. I asked them why they dated asians, and without skipping a beat they said that it was because in San Francisco, the "higher quality" women happened to be mostly asian. They claimed that asians were generally better educated, took better care of themselves, and were more ambitious. Each guy confirmed this.
I may be wrong since I'd only met these guys briefly a couple times before, but they seemed genuine. It caught me off guard since I had always thought some white guys just had a fetish for asian girls. And I found it refreshing because it made sense and seemed somewhat objective(ish).
― Wookie Rookie, Thursday, 6 September 2007 06:31 (eighteen years ago)
They claimed that asians were generally better educated, took better care of themselves, and were more ambitious.
This is just hilarious. Sweeping generalisations to cover your fascination with a group of women from another culture. You should have loaded them up with some alcohol and/or drugs, maybe they would have added: they're better in the sack. Talk about positive discrimination. (I jest of course. In a way.) I mean, what if you said: "I dislike Moroccan guys because they are generally not well educated, take less good care of themselves and are less ambitious!" (Something that is said at times here in our country.)
― nathalie, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:07 (eighteen years ago)
I think white guys with long hair are supremely intelligent and tasteful beings of pure heart.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:18 (eighteen years ago)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=gmqX75fQiDs
;l
― luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:40 (eighteen years ago)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=lTMGJTh90zM
;1
― luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:40 (eighteen years ago)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=PQzfWCxCZXY
;>
― luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:42 (eighteen years ago)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=I4kUain1cOc
;I
― luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:43 (eighteen years ago)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=-RZtljxOjJk
lol they look like mongoloids
― luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:43 (eighteen years ago)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Nv5UdPWkZ7U
Ü
― luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:45 (eighteen years ago)
I think white guys with long hair are supremely intelligent and tasteful beings of pure heart.
Well, duh, you like dEUS!
― stevienixed, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:49 (eighteen years ago)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=-ylwPXbM_bY
;?
― luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:49 (eighteen years ago)
^lol
― luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:50 (eighteen years ago)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=as2E_ThTSBQ
‘‘
― luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:52 (eighteen years ago)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=7Ni3n0afYrA
tell me my creep game ain't on point ;]
― luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:54 (eighteen years ago)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=DmyomjQPQsQ&mode=related&search=
;þ
― luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:55 (eighteen years ago)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=0d71v6WpEI0&mode=related&search=
;'
― luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:57 (eighteen years ago)
ftw ^^^^^^^^^^
― luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 08:57 (eighteen years ago)
i should be shot ;]
― luriqua, Thursday, 6 September 2007 09:00 (eighteen years ago)
;>
― ☪, Thursday, 6 September 2007 09:17 (eighteen years ago)
id say a lot (not all though) of these girls have self hate issues or are trying to move up the social ladder.
― mr x, Monday, 21 January 2008 18:16 (seventeen years ago)
I'd say you were trolling.
― Bodrick III, Monday, 21 January 2008 18:18 (seventeen years ago)
id say you have a right to your poorly formed opinion.
― mr x, Monday, 21 January 2008 18:25 (seventeen years ago)
old ilx
― DG, Monday, 21 January 2008 18:34 (seventeen years ago)
"I'm a Leg Man"
I want to hear someone say this and somehow know they're making inappropriate Milne-style proper nouns. Or do I?
― Abbott, Monday, 21 January 2008 18:36 (seventeen years ago)
But why would anyone do that? Asian girls are neither blonde nor leggy
― Embarchie, Monday, 28 January 2008 23:34 (seventeen years ago)
^ uh
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 28 January 2008 23:44 (seventeen years ago)
tru
― chaki, Monday, 28 January 2008 23:52 (seventeen years ago)
i'm more of a wheel man myself
http://www.invisionauto.com/Photo%20albums/LI%20Extreme/Radio%20Cit%20Rat.jpg
― rockapads, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 00:02 (seventeen years ago)
What about Chinese Men Who Exclusively Date Japanese Women?
http://www.japantoday.com/jp/shukan/432
― S-, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 00:18 (seventeen years ago)
"I feel superior when having sex with Japanese women because their country invaded China in the past. This is a kind of payback"
― Embarchie, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 00:24 (seventeen years ago)
"The next 10 thrusts are for the Nanking Massacre"
― Embarchie, Tuesday, 29 January 2008 00:27 (seventeen years ago)
I've never understood why white males are the only ones in this equation who are being ridiculed and criticised for only dating/fetishising asian women. I mean, it's way, way more common for asian women to date white males than the opposite. Looks to me that it's the asian women who are "obsessed" with white males.
― Lovelace, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 00:20 (seventeen years ago)
But the original question is about white dudes. Their behaviour is strange. I mean, asian girls do not even have big boobs.
― Embarchie, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 00:27 (seventeen years ago)
bada bing
― rip whiney g weingarten 03/11 never forget (history mayne), Thursday, 2 December 2010 18:59 (fourteen years ago)
Embarchie
― (ㅅ) (am0n), Thursday, 2 December 2010 19:00 (fourteen years ago)
why did momus leave anyway
come back momus-chan...
― Princess TamTam, Thursday, 2 December 2010 19:08 (fourteen years ago)
But the original question is about white dudes. Their behaviour is strange. I mean, asian girls do not even have big boobs.
― Embarchie, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 00:27 (2 years ago)
― Ectothiorhodospira shaposhnikovii (nakhchivan), Thursday, 2 December 2010 19:08 (fourteen years ago)
I would be one of those guys if I could get past the existence of stereotypes. I dated a Korean for a few weeks when one conversation just derailed our relationship:
(phone conversation)
ME: so what are you doing?
HER: nothing, having a snack
ME: Oh yeah, whatcha eatin' (duh, dumb endearing quality)
HER: rice
ME: What kind?
HER: What?
ME: What kind of rice? (realizing I just made a mistake)
HER: Have you ever had Korean food?
ME: YEAH, of course... No, wait, actually, I'm not sure that I have, actually...
HER: Koreans eat a lot of rice
ME: Um, I'm sure not all Koreans do. I mean, wouldn't it be kind of stereotypical if I said, "RICE! Of course you're eating rice!" (I said something to this affect, but can't remember exactly)
HER: I like rice.
ME: Me too! Rice pilaf... rice... hey, do you like risotto?
HER: You got something against rice?
ME: No, no, of course not. Leave me alone, gook! (just kidding!)
seriously, I don't remember the specifics, but surprisingly to me, a conversation about rice was what seemed to split us apart. I just felt alienated, as I'm sure did she, and yet I was just being a casual american. It actually didn't occur to me that she'd be eating RICE. That's like eating sprouts or something-- where's the rest of the meal?
But, Asians can be BAYOOTEEEFUL and I think they're hot.
― Nude Spock, Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:00 PM (8 years ago) Bookmark
― The Dumbest Jews on the Planet (and Maureen Dowd) (symsymsym), Friday, 3 December 2010 16:36 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRHLIvg7zHQ
http://theyreallsobeautiful.com/
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 12:41 (twelve years ago)
I have met too many of those kinds of dudes.
― Heyman (crüt), Wednesday, 3 April 2013 13:18 (twelve years ago)
i cracked up @ the dude @ 1:58
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 3 April 2013 13:20 (twelve years ago)
not guys who date asian women. I don't have a problem with that. I mean the creepy racist porn-damaged asian fetish dudes. I hate to kneejerk hate on shut-ins but the weird obsession with racial & sexual submission is something I can't forgive in anyone.
x-post 2:21 was the biggest "this fuckin guy" moment for me
― Heyman (crüt), Wednesday, 3 April 2013 13:24 (twelve years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kbGrQe17cU
i hadn't actually seen the traielr for this, wowwwwwwww so uncomfortable/awkward
― 乒乓, Monday, 22 April 2013 21:22 (twelve years ago)
unban momus
― turds (Hungry4Ass), Monday, 22 April 2013 21:25 (twelve years ago)
^
― 乒乓, Monday, 22 April 2013 21:26 (twelve years ago)
http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2332/1720860102_514c7ba55c_m.jpg
― some dude, Monday, 22 April 2013 21:29 (twelve years ago)
I read that as urban momus
― ヘイシグ・ブローズ (MaresNest), Monday, 22 April 2013 21:30 (twelve years ago)
ugh
― the late great, Monday, 22 April 2013 21:31 (twelve years ago)
now i feel dirty for clicking on this thread
― the late great, Monday, 22 April 2013 21:31 (twelve years ago)
Oh
my
god
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Monday, 22 April 2013 21:55 (twelve years ago)
"Oh look, there's two of 'em!" If there are a lot more moments like that during the movie I...no, I can't lie, I will absolutely watch that.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Monday, 22 April 2013 21:57 (twelve years ago)
duuuuuuuuuuuuude so awesome must show wife
― The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Monday, 22 April 2013 22:00 (twelve years ago)
i will def, def see that
holy shit
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 22 April 2013 22:53 (twelve years ago)
Amazing
― pssstttt, Hey you (dog latin), Monday, 22 April 2013 22:59 (twelve years ago)
i couldn't even watch the trailer
― well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Monday, 22 April 2013 23:00 (twelve years ago)
is Momus actually banned? lol.
― Pat Finn, Monday, 22 April 2013 23:08 (twelve years ago)
i couldn't even watch the trailer
― well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Monday, April 22, 2013 7:00 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark
it was extra tough for me since i could understand everything she was saying, intonation etc.
― 乒乓, Monday, 22 April 2013 23:09 (twelve years ago)
Is it even more grim than it looks?
― ヘイシグ・ブローズ (MaresNest), Monday, 22 April 2013 23:32 (twelve years ago)
well the part where he thinks he's rehearsing wedding vows and she's doing some play-talking-to-children ish about cutting off fingers and toes stuff, yikes
― 乒乓, Monday, 22 April 2013 23:37 (twelve years ago)
yeah I can't see it ending well and/or happily for either of them
whole thing looks v sad and awkward just from the trailer
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Monday, 22 April 2013 23:41 (twelve years ago)
Too bad my wife will never ever post on here about creepo dudes like that guy. Or maybe I'm glad she won't, given that I've heard plenty of stories.
Hopefully there will be a sequel about his second wife from Thailand. Who, hopefully will have a dick.
― The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Monday, 22 April 2013 23:52 (twelve years ago)
I remember listening to a story about this film on npr a while back: http://www.npr.org/2012/06/22/155571292/for-one-man-she-had-to-be-pretty-and-asian
I'm interested in seeing the movie.
― The last of the famous international Greyjoys (Nicole), Monday, 22 April 2013 23:53 (twelve years ago)
LUM: Yeah. You know, growing up as an Asian-American woman, you can not live without encountering so many men like the main character of my film.
what my wife says
― The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Monday, 22 April 2013 23:59 (twelve years ago)
i feel like fetishizing a specific race is a racist thing to do because it has to do with "exoticization," which works to reify racial difference. in 2013, whether someone is asian or not should not be a big deal. i don't know how momus got around that critique of his asian fetish.
― Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 00:45 (twelve years ago)
is Momus actually banned? lol.
― Pat Finn, Monday, April 22, 2013 7:08 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
i dunno, i asked where he went a while back and someone said he was, i think.
― turds (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 00:50 (twelve years ago)
god that movie looks both hilarious and painfully awkward/creepy. want to see it, but i expect i'll spend half the running time watching from between my fingers.
― I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:00 (twelve years ago)
parts of this and discussion from the director were on This American Life a few weeks ago
xpost maybe from that other NPR story?
― Devendra Bumhat (sic), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:03 (twelve years ago)
i wouldn't be able to sit through that movie, i don't think.
― Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:03 (twelve years ago)
bc of the cringe-factor
― Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:04 (twelve years ago)
Momus isn't banned iirc, he left (but kept lurking everyday, according to himself when he blamed SB for killing Bimble)
― Devendra Bumhat (sic), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:04 (twelve years ago)
jeez. he actually said that?
― Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:06 (twelve years ago)
x-post 2:21 was the biggest "this fuckin guy" moment for me
― Heyman (crüt), Wednesday, April 3, 2013 9:24 AM (2 weeks ago)
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mdcakumIju1rt290oo2_1280.png
― veryupsetmom (harbl), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:16 (twelve years ago)
Momus isn't banned iirc, he left (but kept lurking everyday, according to himself when he blamed SB for killing Bimble)
― Devendra Bumhat (sic), Monday, April 22, 2013 9:04 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark
ty
― turds (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:17 (twelve years ago)
now i'm depressed and want to harm momus
― I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:18 (twelve years ago)
sb?? what?
― well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:18 (twelve years ago)
well the part where he thinks he's rehearsing wedding vows and she's doing some play-talking-to-children ish about cutting off fingers and toes stuff, yikes
Was I the only one who had subtitles?
― pplains, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:22 (twelve years ago)
well the part where he thinks he's rehearsing wedding vows and she's doing some play-talking-to-children ish about cutting off fingers and toes stuff, yikes
read this and for some reason kind of immediately thought of 'audition.'
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:23 (twelve years ago)
Good work, Internet.
http://cdn1.images.videobash.com/photos/000/042/401/42401.jpg
― pplains, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:29 (twelve years ago)
i've noticed this. it's fucking weird and gross. unless, i suppose, you're an asian porn star, in which case, go team.
― I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:31 (twelve years ago)
huge lol at pplains
― balls, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:33 (twelve years ago)
Hopefully there will be a sequel about his second wife from Thailand. Who, hopefully will have a dick.
wanna roll this fucking colonialist racist garbage back a little dandy don? signed, a guy whose inlaws are all from Thailand, you fucking dick
― not feeling those lighters (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:46 (twelve years ago)
You're having a hard time with sarcasm. Get over yourself.
― The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:49 (twelve years ago)
north vs south
― balls, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:49 (twelve years ago)
your "sarcasm" is gross racist crap. I know from your posts here you think you get a pass, but you don't. eat shit.
― not feeling those lighters (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:50 (twelve years ago)
underrated aerosmith is right dandy, that pose was offensive on multiple levels. and not just in a PC way, but in a way where i can actually imagine a transperson reading that and feeling hurt and alienated.
― Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:51 (twelve years ago)
*post
― Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:51 (twelve years ago)
lol @ imagining dandy don accepting trans people as actually being people
― not feeling those lighters (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:52 (twelve years ago)
Was I the only one who had subtitles?
― pplains, Monday, April 22, 2013 9:22 PM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark
i was speaking more to the intonation/cues in her voice and the way she said stuff
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:53 (twelve years ago)
in the beginning when she finds out whatever bureaucratic process he went through wasn't actually legally binding, there's a real note of panic + fear in her voice
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:54 (twelve years ago)
is there some kind of thai = trans stereotype i'm not aware of? hate to ask, but i'm a little lost...
― I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:57 (twelve years ago)
apparently
― The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:58 (twelve years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathoey
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:59 (twelve years ago)
okay, expanding universe and all
― I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:01 (twelve years ago)
So sorry for any sort of unintended allusions to stereotype. Unintentional. I guess I need to get out more often.
― The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:02 (twelve years ago)
dude. no.
― Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:06 (twelve years ago)
come on. that was not unintentional. it is a really common stereotype. a popular iteration of it has -- as in your "joke" -- an american in thailand "accidentally" having sex with a trans person. this can be seen in the hangover 2, but also other places
― Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:07 (twelve years ago)
boy this is boring
― balls, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:10 (twelve years ago)
come on. that was not unintentional.
I've never seen either Hangover movie. Sorry I'm not up to date with this stereotype. None of my buddies have ever been on a sex tour of Thailand, but my impression was that kind of thing was with underage girls.
Again, I'm sorry about that.
― The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:13 (twelve years ago)
yeah i thought thailand related fetish was pedophilia myself also. i think every trans person i know is white or black, would guess that's the case in sandy springs or atlanta or wherever don lives now.
― balls, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:16 (twelve years ago)
i've never read anything about women into asian guys. feel like i'm asking for a disaster if i'm just asking for uninformed opinions here and iunno if anyone on ilx actually would want to share their experiences in this regard... i do know its a thing, i do know my sense is that it is much less creepy in general, but i have the feeling its not really talked about as much. i'd be interested in any suggestions for articles or anything?
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:18 (twelve years ago)
^i personally know one woman like that, and that's 100% of my knowledge on the subject
― Andrew Stockdale Kills Wolfmother, self (electricsound), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:20 (twelve years ago)
i don't think anybody's done any sort of theorizing on the subject
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:20 (twelve years ago)
oh jeez, there's this one blog about it, what's it called
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:21 (twelve years ago)
lol: http://www.speakingofchina.com/
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:22 (twelve years ago)
haha speaking out of turn here and i may be wrong here in which case my bad but i knew a girl, who posted here sometimes, who definitely seemed to be dating almost exclusively indian dudes for a while there. generally though when i've known women who gone for some interracial exclusivity it was black women who were into white guys or white women who were into black guys. that could just be greater opportunity though, i've known way more whites and blacks than asians. i've never known of anything as developed and creepy as yr momus types though.
― balls, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:25 (twelve years ago)
xpost ok i am finding that blog a bit creepy.
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:26 (twelve years ago)
did link to this article tho: http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/ASIAN-POP-Opening-the-box-2464552.php
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:31 (twelve years ago)
i've never read anything about women into asian guys. feel like i'm asking for a disaster if i'm just asking for uninformed opinions here and iunno if anyone on ilx actually would want to share their experiences in this regard... i do know its a thing, i do know my sense is that it is much less creepy in general, but i have the feeling its not really talked about as much. i'd be interested in any suggestions for articles or anything?
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Monday, April 22, 2013 10:18 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark
i was looking at an amwf tumblr run by a white girl a while back, so they're out there
― turds (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:34 (twelve years ago)
dunno if it's mentioned upthread but louis theroux did a show about guys like this going to thailand to find brides.
― fit and working again, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:37 (twelve years ago)
Re how "creepy" or whatever it is, only Asian dudes who are being fetishized can answer that, depending on how creepy they find it. It doesn't have the overlay of "subservient" femininity in quite the same way, though, and never can. Which, on that point I feel like there's a straight line between the "subservience" of Asian women and colonialism, but someone can school me if that is wrong or incomplete?
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:41 (twelve years ago)
no i think that's the whole issue right there -- why this particular fetish seems creepy and problematic. especially with the added thing about these "brides" from asia being desperate for a green card -- which seems to be the case in that movie -- the power asymmetry is pretty galling and, you have to suspect, part of the appeal for that dude
― Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:44 (twelve years ago)
"on that point I feel like there's a straight line between the "subservience" of Asian women and colonialism"
in one sense, yeah, but bear in mind that asian societies (huge generalization to be made i know, but...) took a leap from feudal/pre-feudal forms into the modern world fairly abruptly. like some western dudes might fetishize japanese women as being 'submissive' but what's actually expected of japanese women in japan is pretty regressive too typically. mainland china i can't speak to, but i think there's an irony here in that its a society that went through a revolution and had a sort of huge shake-up in the role of women. so if there's a place in the region where ethnically chinese women would be the least accepting of any sort of china-doll bullshit, i'd imagine it would be the mainland?
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:55 (twelve years ago)
arranged fetishization
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 02:59 (twelve years ago)
wow so i googled up reviews of this film and multiple ones have the guy in question "responding" to the film in the comments.
Many misconceptions fade away with this film. Many seem to remain. Many arise anew.
“Sight Unseen?” Debbie Lum being an ABC came loaded with her own stereotypes imbued in her vision.
While it does capture some truths, ithe film does not show the entire truth.
In the end it is only Debbie Lum’s view of our life and her version of our life.What does not come across, and what you did not notice, is the fact that I took nine trips to China to meet different people. People who, like me, wanted to change their lives.
I met Sandy on the fifth trip after ten months of almost daily email and WebCam communication with each other for long hours at a time before we even met in person.
Sandy was raised in the country on a tea farm which gave her a grounding of good morals and a work ethic.
Then ten years in the big city where her hard work and determination led her to become an executive secretary in an upscale fashion company.
She was not a face in a catalog that I ordered by number. She is a vibrant, intelligent, can-do person with a quick wit and wonderful sense of humor.
My first time with her was a two week long 24/7visit that was great fun and we communicated rather well with the aid of our electronics and old-fashioned hand gestures.Then followed a short visit to meet her parents and tell them we were serious.
Then another two week visit to make sure we were still on track with each other.
And then a final visit to go to the US Consulate and prove that we want to be truly a married couple.
I dare say that this is a longer and more formal courtship then most American couples undertake.To have it summed up as a “creepy love affair” is quite an insulting paycheck for my open honesty.
To have our love doubted or put as questionable by someone who has not even talked to me strikes me as slightly arrogant.What has followed, besides the few misunderstanding stumbling blocks of culture shock featured in the film, is a marriage of three and a half years that has grown in happiness and love.
As for my attraction to the exotic beauty of Asian women, really, what’s not to like?
It is really a numbers game as well. The odds are on my side.
There are billions of Chinese.
Here in America I am an invisible almost non human with greatly reduced minimal receptive choices.
In China I am greeted continually with smiling happy faces wherever I go.Not a tough decision.
It is a totally pragmatic and practical decision on my part.
My “creepy” search was a methodical process of finding one person with whom I had the best chemistry.
I found her.Steven Bolstad
Protagonist
Creepy White Guy
Seeking Asian Female
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:17 (twelve years ago)
lol his signature. hope he signs emails that way too
― brony james (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:21 (twelve years ago)
Here in America I am an invisible almost non human with greatly reduced minimal receptive choices.
― Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:28 (twelve years ago)
:'-(
― Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:28 (twelve years ago)
I think there was a smiley by "creepy white guy" that my copy/paste didn't pick up.
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:31 (twelve years ago)
really, what’s not to like?
― fit and working again, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:32 (twelve years ago)
xpost s. clover, lol and ew. yeah, that guy basically admits that he looked to china to find a wife because over there he can exploit his white american privilege to attract women who wouldn't give him a second look if they felt they had more opportunities and options. i say fuck this guy.
― Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:36 (twelve years ago)
As for my attraction to the exotic beauty of Asian women, really, what’s not to like?
The only sentence of his entire response that matters.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:38 (twelve years ago)
p much
― well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:57 (twelve years ago)
idk, doesnt the entire thread discuss that without convincingly coming to that pat of a conclusion?
― the gowls are not what they seem (darraghmac), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 06:01 (twelve years ago)
Which, on that point I feel like there's a straight line between the "subservience" of Asian women and colonialism, but someone can school me if that is wrong or incomplete?
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Monday, April 22, 2013 10:41 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
yeah - america's had a p long history with colonialism and asia, see not only world war ii/korean war/vietnam war etc., but also the colonization of the philippines. see also the continuing military bases in japan, korea, philippines. see also: the war brides act of 1945, which provided a route for asian spouses of us servicemen to immigrate at a time when asians were p much exclusively barred from immigrating into the us. also prob doesn't need to be said, but wherever the US military went, brothels in the area did a brisk trade, or where there was none, there would be after the military established itself there.
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 11:49 (twelve years ago)
in one sense, yeah, but bear in mind that asian societies (huge generalization to be made i know, but...) took a leap from feudal/pre-feudal forms into the modern world fairly abruptly. like some western dudes might fetishize japanese women as being 'submissive' but what's actually expected of japanese women in japan is pretty regressive too typically. mainland china i can't speak to, but i think there's an irony here in that its a society that went through a revolution and had a sort of huge shake-up in the role of women. so if there's a place in the region where ethnically chinese women would be the least accepting of any sort of china-doll bullshit, i'd imagine it would be the mainland?
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Monday, April 22, 2013 10:55 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
problem w/ this argument is up until recently, the treatment of women in western societies was pretty regressive too! (and still is, in many respects.) putting aside whether these generalizations are actually true or not, giving these dudes a pass for simply 'slotting in' to preexisting structures of oppression is nagl imo. also doesnt really go anywhere in explaining the dynamics of the relationship between these dudes and asian american women who were born or grew up here.
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 11:54 (twelve years ago)
a billion smiling faces
― pplains, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:07 (twelve years ago)
http://i2.ytimg.com/vi/iCQ0vDAbF7s/mqdefault.jpg
― pplains, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:08 (twelve years ago)
I wish that was a gif where Peter was looking up and shaking his head.
― pplains, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:08 (twelve years ago)
ORIENTAL GIRLS
Tony Rivers examines the enduring appeal of the great western male fantasyMy little China girl/You shouldn't mess with me/I'll ruin everything you
are/I'll give you television/I'll give you eyes of blue/I'll give you man
who wants to/rule the world/And when I get excited/my little China girl
says/Oh baby just you shut your mouth/She says...sh-sh-shhChina Girl, courtesy of David Bowie
She says sh-sh-shh, and the white devil says 'slip out of your ch-ch-cheong
sam and kick off your Imedldas' to his Sino-Barbie, adorable doll,
sh-sh-shameless from Shanghai. Ahhh, silky, silky, sh-sh-shhh...
We are in a high-rish area. This is about race and sex, and you
are going to need a fine sensibility to distinguish the stereotypes and
face up to the amorality of desire and the sexual trade-offs that happen
between races. Otherwise things get ugly.
They did when one kind of zealot gfot excited about the video which
promoted China Girl (it bordered on the adult) but another kind missed an
open goal, Waddle, in failing to condemn it for being not quite the right
kind of positive discrimination. Paul Theroux was less fortunate. A
Playboy article in extravagant praise of oriental girls caused him to be
vilified as the worst kind of chauvinistic brute. It seems that 'oriental
girls' are being redesignated as 'Asian women', 'oriental girls' having,it
is said, connotations of sexual imperialism. Certainly, the story of
occidental/oriental amatory encounters (Madame Butteryfly, Miss Saigon)
tells us that when East meets West, the West gets yellow fever, and the
East gets fucked. But even the newest of men would find if difficult to
dump the oriental girl and all she implies (or promises) from his cultural
baggage. Fantasy management is an impossibility; dreams don't get
Whitehoused.
The stereotype of the oriental girl is the greatest sexual
shared fantasy among western men, and like all the best fantasies, it is
based on virtual ignorance and uncorrupted by actuality. It is so durable
and potent, it must mean something important and contain some element of
truth (about us). Despite the mail order bride industry, it isn't just
about domination, submission, and sexual avarice. There is a wistfullness
there too, and a longing that won't go away. So let's get down to
Sino-eroticism and girls with short sweet names, into the nexus of eroticism
and exoticism.
Heterosexuality, as you may have notices, is a celebration of
difference. Any additional foreignness is therefor welcome; it adds to the
thrill and makes the union more pleasing. Oriental girls are about as
foreign as you can get and, even better, the difference is compounded by
a zillion times by their apparent ultra-femininity. Ultra-femininity in the
West seems to have something to do with frills, frocks, and flounces (a lot
of those) and having to tow a trailerload of cosmetics behind the car when
you go away for a weekend. It also tends to be expensive and non-productive.
You might as well not bother actually to take the ultra-feminine western
girl out-- just send her round a lot of money in a taxi. But oriental[Full page photo of smiling, sunglass wearing Asian model in low cut outfit]
[Full page photo of female crotch area, with clapsed hands squeezed between
thighs. Superemposed caption: On a special day, she might duplicate herself
and give you a two-girl body massage culmination in a venus butterfly]girls (all half-billion of them) are graced by a natural, deep-down
femininity that makes the average bimbo look like Les Dawson.
If this is true (and of course, it is) then the consequences of
having a liason with such a creature could be startling. Give her
extreme femininity, any macho displays designed to separate the boys from
the girls would become redundant. She might soften over-masculinity.
It could enven get more startling, for it seems in one strand of Chinese
sexual thinking that the purpose of sex is the exchange of male and female
characteristics. Alternatively, if you are as butch as Julian Clary,
she'll make you feel like John Wayne.
It is for all those reasons that so many western men have gone
native. Silky, they say, these sexual expatriates, silky, silky. Man
gave a rib to make woman, but it seems that the oriental girl is worth
an arm and a leg.
She is small for a start (takes up less room in your house, says a
cynic), graceful (doesn't bang into furniture). Her shortness may account
for her show fetishism, her many pairs of stiletto Imeldas which she wears
only where appropriate, that is to say, in the street and in bed. Her
skin colour-- ah, that delicious discrimination-- and its texture-- no
blotches, no blemishes, no hint of unwanted hair, lotus-fed, innocent of
roses, silky, silky. Her hair, long and black and shiny, serenely straight,
not excited in waves or curls in fraudulent mimicry or promise of
post-coital disorder. Maybe when she was a poor peasant girl she would
sell it to be bleached in a factory for export to western baldies and maybe
it ended up dead a dyed khaki atop a Brucei, not so silky anymore.
Her face-- round like a child's, small nose like a model's, eyes
almond shaped for mystery, black for suffering, wide-space for innocence,
high cheekbones swelling like bruises, cherry lips. She has no tits, says
the carping mammophile, and no bum says the man who likes a handy shelf
for his martini glass. But she needs no over-elaborated characteristics to
announce or advertise her femininity; that comes from her suppleness and the
fact that she is made of a different flesh-- rice and spice and all things
nice. She is, of course, always young, a lot like a child, and obedient
daughter. And she's a mother too, grateful for the chance to worry. She
cares for you and always forgives, grants you refuge and soothes you with
the stillest part of her female psyche. You lay down your western neurosis
to this rice Madonna. Sh-sh-shhh.
Wehn you get home from another hard day on the planet, she comes
into existence, removes your clothing, bathes you and walks naken on your
back to relax you. And then this is sex. She is sh-sh-shameless, of
course. In the cultrual melange of your fantasy, the sex is pure, there
being no Christianity to smear it. Here we are talking about the art of
love, the secrets fo ancient pleasurings passed down through the female
line. Sexually manipulative and over-rehearsed, some say of the oriental
girl; perfect, you think. You don't care that the application of the
opposition of cosmic forces to sex, the yin-yang implies that it is more
life-enhancing to give rather than to receive orgasms. She makes you
spend like a sailor. On a very special day, the oriental girl might
duplicated herslef (such are the mysteries of the East) and give you atwo girl body massage culminating in a venus butterfly; then again, she
may uses a trunkful of strange implements, the purpose of which isdifficult to ascertain, until you start smiling a lot. She's fun you see,
and so uncomplicated. She doeesn't go to assertiveness-traing classes,
insist on being treated like a person, fret about career moves, wield her
orgasm as a non-negotiable demand.
Does she exist? Of course she does. She been around a long
time now, and she's anything you want her to be.
[Full page pic of Asian female model, face/eyes downcast, tight, short dress]So compliant. She's the last refuge of the roue. Shes there when
you need short leave from those angry feminist seas. She's a handy victim
of love or a symbol of the rape of the third world nations, a real trouper.
She was Puccini's M. Butterfly as early as 1900 and she's currently in
Miss Saigon. Both times, it ended in tears.
In the early Sixties, played by the actress Tsai Chin, she
appeared in The World Of Suzie Wong. She was (what else?) a tart with a
heart. As a show, it apparently wasn't up to much. The priapic drama critc
Kenneth Tynan described the contemporary craze for China-girl shows at a
'a world of woozy song'. (He then had an affair with the forgiving Tsai
Chin) One spin-off from the show was a world wide hit called The Ding
Dong Song. Another was a fashion craze. English girls would grow their
hair long and dye it black, pencil their eyes into almond shapes and
sqeeze themselves, often idadvisedly, into a cheong-sam. (The cheong-sam
is long overdue for a revival, and as it is a part of your sexual heritage,
you have the right to know that it is a very tight dress, the demure, high
neckline of which is flatly contradicted by the face that it is slit to the
thigh. It embodies innocence and wantoness.) Suzie Wong was the
originator of the modern fantasy; She, in the form of real-life tarts of
uncertian racial origins, would for years advertised playful submissiveness
in the windows of newsagent's shops. Perhaps even now, on a signboard in
a secondary shopping parade on the edge of a small town, Suze awaits a
call.
Meanwhile, she is young and vital in fat paperback novels. She is
Mai-Mai in Tai Pan and she kowtows and says things like: "You are so bad to
me and I am so good to you. Let's make love." Afterwards, her lover
reaches for the hot towels she has prepared for him. 'No,' she says, '
let me. It give me pleasure and it is my duty.'
She's a hostess, a bar girl, a waitress, a geisha. She serves.
In Chinese, a feminine for of 'I' means 'slave'. But she is a slave who
enraptures. She is a powerful idea.Just occasionally, she goes off the rails, and then we get very
upset. She becomes a Madame Mao or a Mrs. Marcos. We worry then; she
could be human after all. There are stories about western men who've
married her, and overnight the waif has metamorphosed into a Dragon
Lady, an oriental princess in love with shopping and food, a strict
monogamaniac. It can't be true (or any more true than the fantasy),
but then it is curious that oriental men seldom boast of the virtues
of oriental wives.
What do they dream in those teeming China nights; where do their
fantasies lie? In the penetration of the lotus, the discovery of the jade,
of silky hair and skin that goes sh-sh-shh at a touch? More likely they
see the mysterious West; those strong abundant women with big breasts,
long legs, yellow hair and eyes round and blue like those of a Siamese
cat. Another sh-sh-shh Shangri-la.
^^ this was published in GQ in 1990
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:26 (twelve years ago)
...
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:38 (twelve years ago)
"giving these dudes a pass for simply 'slotting in' to preexisting structures of oppression is nagl imo"
oh i agree. i'm not arguing that colonial history isn't an issue here (tho really, british colonial history before american, as far as really setting out the stereotypes etc. to begin with -- bear in mind suzie wong is a british novel set in a british colony), but it also seems to me that part of the notions these dudes latch onto are distorted elements of actual differences in gender relations (not positive ones). i mean women in general really do have it way rougher in parts of asia, and there's a culture that valorizes that to a degree (this isn't an argument that 'oh, cultural differences, cool bruv'), and that's certainly part of the picture. we can point to like 'china doll' stuff and whatever in the u.s. but what lots of ppl are into is basically derived from japanese anime, which i don't think is either by and large produced for an audience of americans in america, or americans in u.s. military bases. (so yeah maybe the guys into chinese women vs. the guys into japanese women are quite different in the sorts of things they're fetishizing here and i could be thinking more of the latter?)
also bear in mind that the u.s. has had lots of army bases freaking everywhere, historically. and there are e.g. lots of representations in literature of troops stationed in france going to brothels and prostitutes there and that's part of the sexual represenation of french women in the u.s., but its nothing at all like representations of asian women. and again, latin america. i'll grant that america's military presence throughout asia, due to like war after war, etc. was more protracted and significant than a bunch else in recent memory. but part of it is also maybe not that there are sexual representations of asian women, but that that's like been the _only_ representation for so long? i think there's a huge chunk of people to whom chinese women signify massage parlors, that scene from full metal jacket that 2 live crew sampled, maybe some scene from rush hour or rush hour 2 involving a massage parlor, and perhaps sweet and sour chicken and a gong banging and _nothing else_. so the element of lack of asian immigration to the u.s. for a whole period probably plays a role there? i mean at a certain point if you grow up knowing lots of or even some asian ppl i don't see how you could possibly even begin to have this exoticized view of ppl from that part of the world to begin with.
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:38 (twelve years ago)
yeah that gq article was weird because it seemed to take for granted that the reader 1.) was not asian and 2.) didn't have a lot of experience with asian people, which today those are an insane things to assume about gq readers.
― Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:47 (twelve years ago)
see i don't really like that line of argument at all, locating the source of these negative stereotypes in the culture of asian countries themselves...are you saying that these cultural assumptions then spread out across over the pacific and into the_west and that's the reason why white dudes are into this? nah, doesn't scan bruh. like, there is prob a subset of these dudes who are really into japanese anime... but like, what, is that a necessary condition? i'm pretty confident that the majority of these dudes have never watched anime in their lives! a lot of these bros dont even really make a distinction between chinese, japanese, or korean, dont actively consume asian media, i don't really see it as a necessary condition.
and there's a p simple reason why e.g. perceptions of french women differ from those of asian women, and that's located firmly in the politics of white hegemony? it's p hard for white americans to otherize french women to the same extent that they do to asian women, i think, for obvious reasons.
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:50 (twelve years ago)
Oh, there are definitely people who grew up knowing a fair number of asian people who still end up with the white man/asian woman thing (in that their relationships tend to follow that line, nearly exclusively), but with a different dynamic at play. xxp
― Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:50 (twelve years ago)
also i'm gonna out myself as an anime watching nerd, but of the anime i've watched *cough cough*, it's not all submissive representations of women! like, honestly, that's probably the exception rather than the norm. signed, shiroi basket shoes
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:51 (twelve years ago)
i think the submissive asian woman thing doesn't exist as a stereotype anymore except among weird, creepy old people with their minds stuck in the 70s
― Pat Finn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:53 (twelve years ago)
tbf the adults watching anime (especially that targeted at youth in its home country) thing kind of dovetails with the really awkward explanation I've heard that a lot of physical characteristics seen as "asian" code as "youthful" to western eyes. As in, the stereotypical inability of white men to tell how old an asian woman is, combined with an interest in younger women you end up with...
urgh
― Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:54 (twelve years ago)
there's also this idea that the asian woman who is submissive, obedient, devoted, etc. is directly opposed to the modern 'western' woman (who codes as white, obv) who is liberated, career-oriented, a feminist. so there's that dynamic at play too, probably the venn diagram between asian fetishists and MRA dudes contains a pretty fat middle.
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 13:58 (twelve years ago)
also w/r/t point that this derives from the consumption of asian media, there is...virtually no mainland chinese media being consumed in the US at the moment. most of it historicaly has come from HK and taiwan, and that's mostly been of the triad/kung-fu variety which...don't really feature images of submissive chinese/taiwanese women? really, the opposite, there are tons of ass kicking HK female movie stars. w/r/t korean media, there's K-pop, korean movies, and korean soap operas. can't really speak to the movies/soap operas but the depictions of women in k-pop are not really that different than how pop stars are depicted in the US/the west, which is not surprising, given that k-pop is influenced so much by western pop!
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:04 (twelve years ago)
I wonder if the protagonist only dated fobby types, or if that is part of the intrinsic exotic appeal to him. Because that might signify an affinity to a more "traditional" Asian (negative?) stereotype? Is there less exoticism (to him) with an Asian American woman who is 2nd or 3rd generation? Because when I imagine a white guy who only dates Asian women, I stereotype him as someone who really digs some element of authenticism. Not sure if I'm explaining myself well here.
― The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:28 (twelve years ago)
protagonist as in the guy in that film? I don't know if he's a "dates only asian women" type as much as a "can't successfully date in the US, shops for wife abroad" type
― Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:32 (twelve years ago)
as in he's exclusively looking for a woman in southeast asia because he feels unappreciated at home (lol) and feels the power dynamic at play in finding a wife there is more his speed
― Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:34 (twelve years ago)
right he obviously has not been successful shopping for a wife at home, but wonder if he gravitated towards all Asian Americans or just the ones that he perceived as exotic.
― The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:36 (twelve years ago)
Those webcam conversations must have been something.
― pplains, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:37 (twelve years ago)
a lot of one handed typing, I suspect
― The Great Natterer (dandydonweiner), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:39 (twelve years ago)
"can't successfully date in the US, shops for wife abroad"
Based on how most of these dudes develop into ppl who seek out Asian child-brides, it's unlikely that this guy ever seriously considered dating a woman who would have been willing to date him? Typically men who follow this pattern have already decided that any woman of their own age or background isn't good enough for them, and then they feel betrayed by womanhood when "hot" younger women don't take them seriously. Anyway, please go back to being stunned by the odiousness of that GQ article, I don't want to take away from that.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:58 (twelve years ago)
googling for "tony rivers", writer doesn't turn up a whole lot
― goole, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:04 (twelve years ago)
Also, the creepy dude from the documentary specifically mentioned his wife having "good morals". I notice a lot of the guys seeking asian women also mention this because they think western women are too promiscuous. I think they're so insecure that the idea of a woman they're interested in having been with another person is very threatening to them.
― The last of the famous international Greyjoys (Nicole), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:05 (twelve years ago)
he might have to date someone who wanted to do stuff other than listen to his long-winded stories and bring him sandwiches
suddenly remembering another way my grandpa is a dick
― Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:05 (twelve years ago)
"virtually no mainland chinese media being consumed in the US at the moment"
right i think in part, as i said, we're talking about different segments of ppl being into ppl from different places (altho point about not being able to tell the difference between korea, china, vietnam, etc. among some ppl granted). but i would disagree that k-pop is basically western derivative -- huge portions are, but there's also a kawaii element that's v. much japan derived, and something that i'd imagine (?) plenty of ppl associate with the "east" generally.
something else to bear in mind is that in malaysia, burma etc. under british colonial rule (and i'd guess american in the philippines?) chinese women were considered more 'prized' than women more ethnically local to those regions because precisely of how 'almost white' they were -- all the descriptions of delicate features, porcelain skin, etc.
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:09 (twelve years ago)
do you have any examples in mind of the kawaii aesthetic in k-pop? not being combative, genuinely curious! i think that there are a fair share of k-pop videos in the high school setting, but i don't really remember them as being kawaii-themed
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:23 (twelve years ago)
speaking from very limited and removed experience, i'd say there is a "thing" of people (men and woman, though it expresses differently) who have not had much success in love in their own culture going outside it where values are different. I knew a set of sisters from a very insular, religious and troubled family who nearly exclusively dated & married men from elsewhere. anecdata i know, but it def looked like trouble getting along in the society around you and still wanting that companionship. the cultural disconnection can kind of mask the personal disconnection, maybe? idk, trying not to sound like a jerk here.
i'm with geebs on being unable to watch even the whole of that preview because of embarrassment reflex. but i don't want to fully remove agency from the young woman -- what set of circumstances and motivations would cause her to sign on that dotted line? security? adventure? lack of 'good men' at home? family pressure? not having a clear idea what she's getting into? it's p baffling to me, honestly! it's crazy to think of these women as being so 'submissive' when the quality that comes through to me is a real fuck-it-all gung ho bravery.
― goole, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:27 (twelve years ago)
second part of that is very otm
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:28 (twelve years ago)
well, they did mention the phrase "green card" a few times there, but that might be a bad lead
― Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:28 (twelve years ago)
xp and the first part made you grit your teeth in disgust, i get it
― goole, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:32 (twelve years ago)
"examples in mind of the kawaii aesthetic in k-pop"
not hugely hugely knowledgeable here so there are probably better examples, but i went thru a couple girls generation videos and found e.g.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dn26KORcgUU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-yT_c8ZL2Y
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:41 (twelve years ago)
yeah, kawaii doesn't necessarily have to be in a high school setting? just anything that's super-cutesy. One of the big K-pop memes this year is Gwiyomi (aka the Cutie Song).
― Roz, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:50 (twelve years ago)
fair enough, I think I've been watching too many miss A videos!
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:09 (twelve years ago)
i guess you could argue that there's a difference between aegyo and kawaii - aegyo as a more... demanding... form of cuteness? (i am trying to remember the whereabouts of a conversation i read online about the differences between aegyo and sajiao, which is sort of relevant)
― snapchats and tattoos (c sharp major), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:11 (twelve years ago)
xp and the first part made you grit your teeth in disgust, i get it
― goole, Tuesday, April 23, 2013 11:32 AM (38 minutes ago) Bookmark
haha, not at all! it's just that it feels when these guys do it, it's not so much about cultural values as it is about taking advantage of massive economic disparities between people who live in different countries
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:11 (twelve years ago)
i think you still have to analytically move from cuteness -> submissiveness, if you want to claim that these stereotypes are reinforced or even sourced from the cultures of the countries themselves?
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:12 (twelve years ago)
aha, that aegyo/sajiao discussion: http://maddieloveskpop.tumblr.com/post/42022496537
― snapchats and tattoos (c sharp major), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:13 (twelve years ago)
aaaaah i didn't realize that was 撒娇
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:15 (twelve years ago)
is it a valid/commonly used term in Chinese? i was kind of curious about that.
― snapchats and tattoos (c sharp major), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:20 (twelve years ago)
yeah for sure
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:21 (twelve years ago)
in cantonese it'd be 嗲
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:22 (twelve years ago)
would you mentally associate it, as a concept, with someone who performed a lot of sajiao? or are they quite distinct to you?
i guess particularly relevant to this discussion are troisroyeaumes' points on aegyo as non-traditional:
My take on the issue is that to actually pull off 애교 requires a level of self-assertiveness that is not in fact a traditional gender norm for Korean women.
In short, 애교 is a gender norm for women, but it’s a relatively modern one. Insofar that it is a norm that sets expectations of “feminine behavior”, it could be called anti-feminist. But I think that’s a facile analysis. I would say it is problematic but I can also see how it can coexist with feminist ideals…it just depends on what those ideals are.
― snapchats and tattoos (c sharp major), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:23 (twelve years ago)
hmm, it can definitely be used to describe a person's character. i generally agree that it can co-exist with femininity? but obviously i'm gonna say that with a huge salt shaker in hand as a dude
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:26 (twelve years ago)
i do agree that... it's a pretty active form of participation in a relationship and goal-oriented - not really 'submissive' in the sense of 'i will do whatever my partner tells me to, obediently, quietly.' in fact, it's sort of... the opposite
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:27 (twelve years ago)
i definitely find sajiao easier to understand than aegyo, i guess because i have watched a sufficiency of mainland tv dramas (also, known more princessy mainland-Chinese girls than cutesy Koreans).
But yeah it all seems to exist in the range of being hyper-feminine as a kind of weapon? Which goes from supercute hanging-off-the-arm help-me-it's-so-haaaaaaaaaaard to the super aggressive girly style you still sometimes find among gyaru.
― snapchats and tattoos (c sharp major), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:32 (twelve years ago)
yeah... which is the characterization of 'submissiveness' as a trait of being obedient, not talking back, etc. etc. is so... foreign to me, because none of the chinese women i've known (spanning all age groups) is like that at ALL, even when they are performing 撒娇 or 嗲. like, that's why it feels to me that that kind of trope is much more rooted in the history of colonialism/warfare than it is in any innate cultural values, at least ime - obv cant speak for korean/japanese/other asian cultures.
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:36 (twelve years ago)
i guess another way of putting it is that these stereotypes are created and sited in the western mind; and after that, there's probably some kind of confirmation bias going on in the viewing of media from asian countries; like practically anything that is done in media from these countries is gonna be interpreted as being 'evidence' of these stereotypes? short of, idk, ball stomping. the production of gender relations from within the country is very different than how the west conceptualizes those relations, i think. orientalism etc. etc.
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 17:04 (twelve years ago)
there is this sort of minor point i was going to bring up, about "preexisting structures of oppression", which is the super obvious point that different cultures have different structures of oppression?
here's my facile example: until quite recently, in Japan, the loan word "feminisuto" regularly meant "a man who is nice to women, like holding doors for them and stuff". In Japan there is no tradition of that kind of chivalry that's composed of holding doors open for women, carrying their bags, etc. Not that people don't do it, but it's not so deeply ingrained into ordinary gendered behaviour in the way it still is in e.g. the UK (in fact the 'traditional' image of a married couple, you'd see the woman walking behind the man, and also carrying all of the bags). This doesn't mean women in Japan have traditionally been more oppressed -- but it means that holding open a door for a woman, which in Europe is kind of a reference to a history of infantilising and disempowering women, became in Japan something that was nice-to-women in a specifically modern way.
But that seems pretty antiquated wrt modern gender relations now. e.g., again very minor/facile: my mental image of a hetero Japanese couple on a date these days - at any point over the last 15/20 years, i think? - very definitely features the guy carrying her bags.
― snapchats and tattoos (c sharp major), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 17:04 (twelve years ago)
hah, that's super interesting
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 17:06 (twelve years ago)
but but, like you say, i think this thing continues to be sited in the Western mind long after it stops being practicably true: the idea of "Asian" women as a generic class who are more charmed by chivalry, as part of being more authentically feminine.
― snapchats and tattoos (c sharp major), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 17:07 (twelve years ago)
oh geez, listening to a david choe interview (LA-based korean-american artist) and he's going on about how he does not recommend anyone dating a korean due to his annoyance with his family's cultural norms
― Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 17:26 (twelve years ago)
If you go to the ICA in London, you notice that Japanese girls sometimes seem to be the only people there. I am, in human form, the ICA. I am sustained, like that venerable London arts institution, by the patronage and kindness of these hyper- cultuivated people. I also enjoy fucking them.
― Momus, Tuesday, 29 January 2002 01:00 (11 years ago)
― The pathetic deluded pride that attends ignorance (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Monday, 8 July 2013 21:34 (twelve years ago)
Oh, that's a coincidence! Because I am, in human form, the British houses of parliament during the Opium Wars.
― Grampsy, Monday, 8 July 2013 22:24 (twelve years ago)
Meanwhile I'm the human Uffizi gallery, kept alive by people who mainly visit because they feel they ought to, and find the whole thing too hot and uncomfortable and their feet hurt.
― cardamon, Tuesday, 9 July 2013 16:44 (twelve years ago)
More seriously, I find it really difficult to parse debates around 'dating etiquette' and the ethics of dating, because I don't move in circles where dating actually happens. But lots of internet acquaintances in the US talk about it a lot.
― cardamon, Tuesday, 9 July 2013 16:45 (twelve years ago)
good Momus quote to dig up, cheers Nilmar
― mh, Tuesday, 9 July 2013 18:53 (twelve years ago)
I am, in human form, Tucson's rush hour - heavy and slow, and not passing enough water.
― pplains, Tuesday, 9 July 2013 18:57 (twelve years ago)
thinking of dating exclusively asian women after the current er indoors tbh
― dub job deems (darraghmac), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 20:53 (twelve years ago)
what arts institution are you
― the most promising US ilxor has thrown the TOWEL IN (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 21:04 (twelve years ago)
i was looking through a bookmark file of mine from 2005 the other day, was pleased to find that the link to momus' penis still works
http://imomus.com/michaelangelo.jpeg
― i wanna be a gabbneb baby (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 21:05 (twelve years ago)
good Momus quote to dig up, cheers Nilmar― mh, Tuesday, July 9, 2013 2:53 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark
― i wanna be a gabbneb baby (Hungry4Ass), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 21:05 (twelve years ago)
i find asian girls typically hugely attractive. but i haven't dated any :(
Does this make me a bastard or not?
― darraghmac, Friday, 31 August 2007 13:05 (5 years ago)
think you might be the amsterdam rijksmuseum, closed down for refurbishment for a number of years but now opening up again
― the most promising US ilxor has thrown the TOWEL IN (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 21:06 (twelve years ago)
http://imomus.com/michaelangelo.jpeg
what a wonderful url
― Matt P, Tuesday, 9 July 2013 21:24 (twelve years ago)
down to the peg
― what a wonderful url (Matt P), Tuesday, 9 July 2013 21:25 (twelve years ago)
Got my yellow fever vaccine on Monday and today I'm down with one nostril constantly running, a migraine, dizziness and slight tingling/numbness of my left foot. These are known but somewhat rare side effects. Committed to going to the doctor tomorrow if I don't feel better when I wake up. To that end I've just had a hella generous hot toddy.
Also there was no CD thread for The Vaccines to post dud in twice. No-one needs to rectify this.
― Minister of the Pillow (fionnland), Friday, 10 August 2018 00:20 (seven years ago)
You can start a crossdressing thread fella no one will judge u
― F# A# (∞), Friday, 10 August 2018 00:23 (seven years ago)
I got a mmr booster, tetanus booster, hep first round and a yellow fever shot all in one day once and stupidly went out drinking that night. Four double whiskeys later my body was making the craziest sounds while I was puking.
― Yerac, Friday, 10 August 2018 01:14 (seven years ago)
U shlda recorded it
― F# A# (∞), Friday, 10 August 2018 01:30 (seven years ago)
Probably. I had a roommate at the time that said he heard whistling and woke up.
― Yerac, Friday, 10 August 2018 01:41 (seven years ago)
Ha
― F# A# (∞), Friday, 10 August 2018 01:43 (seven years ago)
puking after a dozen shots
― for i, sock in enumerate (Sufjan Grafton), Friday, 10 August 2018 01:58 (seven years ago)