steve coogan's new sitcom. about a former rock roadie turned, umm, pest exterminator, who has anger-management issues. begins tomorrow night, 10pm, BBC2. seems to have had no advance publicity whatsoever.
i refuse to get my hopes up. (i'll miss the first one anyway; still, i imagine it'll be repeated. repeatedly.) but there is, is there not, a tiny chance that this will rock?
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Sunday, 18 June 2006 20:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 18 June 2006 20:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Sunday, 18 June 2006 20:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Sunday, 18 June 2006 20:55 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Sunday, 18 June 2006 20:58 (nineteen years ago)
(though she's been in Little Britain and Nighty Night and stuff as well)
― ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 18 June 2006 21:03 (nineteen years ago)
The trailers for this have actually made me laugh.
― Shadow of the Waxwing (noodle vague), Sunday, 18 June 2006 21:04 (nineteen years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Sunday, 18 June 2006 21:06 (nineteen years ago)
Dunno...
― caek (caek), Sunday, 18 June 2006 21:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Sunday, 18 June 2006 21:09 (nineteen years ago)
ifile:///Users/squeeze/Desktop/raymond.jpg
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Sunday, 18 June 2006 21:18 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Sunday, 18 June 2006 21:19 (nineteen years ago)
(Still, ailsa says Still Game, so t0tt3nts ahoy!)
― aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Sunday, 18 June 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Shadow of the Waxwing (noodle vague), Sunday, 18 June 2006 21:25 (nineteen years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 19 June 2006 07:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 19 June 2006 07:38 (nineteen years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 19 June 2006 11:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Seriously, Try Punching This Guy in the Face and See What Happens (Enrique), Monday, 19 June 2006 11:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Shadow of the Waxwing (noodle vague), Monday, 19 June 2006 11:36 (nineteen years ago)
― David Orton (scarlet), Monday, 19 June 2006 11:40 (nineteen years ago)
Nice to see a bit of Stevenage banter on the thread.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Monday, 19 June 2006 11:42 (nineteen years ago)
― i am not a nugget (stevie), Monday, 19 June 2006 11:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Seriously, Try Punching This Guy in the Face and See What Happens (Enrique), Monday, 19 June 2006 11:49 (nineteen years ago)
― Shadow of the Waxwing (noodle vague), Monday, 19 June 2006 11:58 (nineteen years ago)
That's Smashing!
― Jack Battery-Pack (Jack Battery-Pack), Monday, 19 June 2006 15:58 (nineteen years ago)
― ailsa (ailsa), Monday, 19 June 2006 16:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Monday, 19 June 2006 16:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Seriously, Try Punching This Guy in the Face and See What Happens (Enrique), Monday, 19 June 2006 18:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Monday, 19 June 2006 20:37 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Monday, 19 June 2006 20:46 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Monday, 19 June 2006 20:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 19 June 2006 20:48 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Monday, 19 June 2006 20:49 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Monday, 19 June 2006 20:50 (nineteen years ago)
― David Orton (scarlet), Monday, 19 June 2006 20:51 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Monday, 19 June 2006 20:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Monday, 19 June 2006 20:55 (nineteen years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 19 June 2006 21:05 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Monday, 19 June 2006 21:12 (nineteen years ago)
time to get torrenting, i guess.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 19 June 2006 21:15 (nineteen years ago)
'yadda yadda yadda.'
― Seriously, Try Punching This Guy in the Face and See What Happens (Enrique), Monday, 19 June 2006 21:19 (nineteen years ago)
I thought it had been trailed fairly well over the past week.
― David Orton (scarlet), Monday, 19 June 2006 21:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Seriously, Try Punching This Guy in the Face and See What Happens (Enrique), Monday, 19 June 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)
the first fifteen mins was alot better than the second though. the interview scene and scenes in his house in particular.
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 19 June 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)
― stirmonster (stirmonster), Monday, 19 June 2006 21:37 (nineteen years ago)
― melton mowbray's APOCALYPTO! (adr), Monday, 19 June 2006 23:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Shadow of the Waxwing (noodle vague), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 00:12 (nineteen years ago)
takes all sorts, i guess... 8)
lots of bad jokes and innuendo in that episode. is he giving pathetic characters bad jokes so we laugh at their sadness in lieu of writing good jokes?
reminded me of the failed rock star in League Of Gentlemen.
― koogy wonderland (koogs), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 07:29 (nineteen years ago)
If you're going to do something about an old roadie, at least try to be realistic.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 07:38 (nineteen years ago)
Made me giggle a bit rather than laugh out loud, but it has potential. Will stick with it and see how we get on.
― Hello Sunshine (Hello Sunshine), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 07:38 (nineteen years ago)
According to my brother, at one point they were considering not showing it at all.
It was entertaining, but not so funny. I think it night grow on me.
I laffed at the mention of Rodox.
― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 07:49 (nineteen years ago)
Why would you want realistic roadies (old or otherwise) in a programme?
I liked it more or less. Fairly pleasant half an hour with some nice touches (the aforementioned Rodox), the crap t-shirts. I'm intrigued that he's done this, it seems very low-key. Has he given up on being a leading man in Hollywood?
― Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 08:41 (nineteen years ago)
Life's too short for fairly pleasant.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:03 (nineteen years ago)
why not?
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:25 (nineteen years ago)
(sorry, got bored. Pimms!)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:31 (nineteen years ago)
Marcello, I'm not so sure that life isn't too short for fairly pleasant. Give me half an hours unpleasantness of an evening, and I can go to bed with a smile on my face. But I'm easily pleased. And this made me smile at least seven or eight times.
As for the music criticism do you mean the music he criticised, or the music he liked which was being criticised because he liked it?
― Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:31 (nineteen years ago)
They should watch It Ain't Half Hot Mum and learn some lessons about how to make people laugh.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:35 (nineteen years ago)
I mean the "music criticism" parts were surely heavily clichéd just to ensure they did appear kind of amusing.
I'd usually be really wary for that kind of thing too, and annoyed by it if I felt it was made to appeal to people with crap ideas about music, but I don't think that's the case here, it's just what the character would say I guess.
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:40 (nineteen years ago)
Talbot Rothwell who wrote the Carry On films (the best ones anyway) probably thought that the Beatles were insects at the bottom of his garden but his stuff is still miles funnier than anything Coogan's ever done.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:45 (nineteen years ago)
Isn't that what Marcellos saying? That the music he (Saxondale) likes is what's being criticised?
Thinking about it now (which means I've been thinking about this programme on and off for tha last hour which is about an hour too long) ere we supposed to think his views on music are wrong but his views about animal rights protestors are not? I like this ambiguity. It was the same with Partridge.
― Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:54 (nineteen years ago)
― David Orton (scarlet), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 09:58 (nineteen years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:06 (nineteen years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:07 (nineteen years ago)
marcello is wrong about the cool police and that.
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:09 (nineteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:11 (nineteen years ago)
But then he didn't write that.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:17 (nineteen years ago)
-- Marcello Carlin (marcellocarli...), June 20th, 2006.
it's irrelevant whether coogan wrote 'the day today'.
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:24 (nineteen years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:27 (nineteen years ago)
I don't follow.
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:28 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctwo/programmes/?id=saxondale
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:29 (nineteen years ago)
xpost
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:36 (nineteen years ago)
Has Cameronite replaced Blairite already?
― Onimo (GerryNemo), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:37 (nineteen years ago)
It is the Nirvana t-shirt bit for anyone who saw it "in real life".
But it doesn't seem to be aiming for Carry On style laughs. It looks fairly bleak, kind of like the funny bits in Jimmy McGovern's The Street.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:39 (nineteen years ago)
I can verify the Hucknall/Coogan friendship: architect friends were doing SC's house the night of the '97 election and SC&MH had been running around them with the champagne etc. while they were trying to work, then SC was phoning them in drink/dial fashion from Royal Festival Hall all night.
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:54 (nineteen years ago)
coogan so isn't cool anyway!
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 10:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 11:03 (nineteen years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 11:05 (nineteen years ago)
― "C" (Holey), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 11:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 11:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 11:37 (nineteen years ago)
Coogan should watch Rab C Nesbitt and see how a proper sitcom is written.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 11:40 (nineteen years ago)
I was mildly interested by the fact that he didn't come over as especially frustrated at all. In fact he seemed pretty contented with his lot, if a little tired. He seems to be a character who you would expect frustration from, like the guy from Creme Brulee, but you don't get it. This is either a new twist on an old theme or me just not getting it.I was also amused by people telling him not to lose his temper. He didn't seem to be losing his temper to me, and the one person he did answer back in a pissed-off way really deserved it.I was very pleased it didn't have any canned laughter in it, but it would be nice to have some more jokes.
― accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 11:48 (nineteen years ago)
Creme Brulee bloke was ex-musician. Coogan bloke is ex-roadie - was always a hanger on, fewer aspirations, feels less disappointment? maybe?
we didn't see him lose his temper but the show started with him in anger management class so i guess we are meant to infer it.
― koogy wonderland (koogs), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 11:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 12:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 13:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 13:52 (nineteen years ago)
oh sorry Marc.
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 13:54 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 13:56 (nineteen years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 14:24 (nineteen years ago)
I thought he was constantly and visibly yearning for his past. That's probably why he virtually adopted a kid in a Nirvana T-shirt.
― "C" (Holey), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 14:27 (nineteen years ago)
He seems to be a character who you would expect frustration from, like the guy from Creme Brulee, but you don't get it.
This really should have been set in Hitchin. I didn't see it last night but from what I've read, Hitchin is crawling with aging rockers like Saxondale.
― dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 14:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 14:42 (nineteen years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 14:49 (nineteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 20 June 2006 15:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Monday, 26 June 2006 20:31 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Monday, 26 June 2006 20:32 (nineteen years ago)
― an eighth polish (an eighth polish), Monday, 26 June 2006 20:51 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Monday, 26 June 2006 20:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Monday, 26 June 2006 20:57 (nineteen years ago)
― an eighth polish (an eighth polish), Monday, 26 June 2006 21:01 (nineteen years ago)
This a was much better episode, yes.
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 26 June 2006 21:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Monday, 26 June 2006 21:11 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to be a nerd, not a geek (chap), Monday, 26 June 2006 21:19 (nineteen years ago)
― caek (caek), Monday, 26 June 2006 21:41 (nineteen years ago)
rather unfunny
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 07:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 07:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 08:14 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 08:18 (nineteen years ago)
― JimD (JimD), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 11:26 (nineteen years ago)
indeed, the only bits i thought hung together properly were the clarkson scenes; the rest felt like it had been cobbled together around those in order to beef it up. on the basis of that one episode, there just don't seem to be enough good ideas here.
the tiny, feeble little sub-plot with the make-up was absolute arse.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 27 June 2006 16:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 07:28 (nineteen years ago)
I could hear it in the other room
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 07:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 09:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 09:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 09:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 09:40 (nineteen years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 09:41 (nineteen years ago)
― koogy wonderland (koogs), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 09:42 (nineteen years ago)
But you didn't like it. Why would you want to remember?I did mean to see it but I think the heat has wiped my brain. I couldn't remember the word "fixture" this morning.
― Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 09:44 (nineteen years ago)
― David Orton (scarlet), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 09:50 (nineteen years ago)
it was staggeringly unfunny, which was a shame because bits of the episode were wonderful. i laughed loudly at two or three points; although, like everyone else, i can't actually remember the precise lines. hmm.
and as a portrait of a friendship it was actually quite touching ... the problem is that the writing just isn't polished enough (perhaps because coogan's penning so much of it and nobody dare tell him bits of it don't work?)
so the scene in the ambulance, which would have been a wonderful piece of comedic bathos, was ruined by the totally unnecessary second line of this exchange:
saxondale: "you don't owe me anything, mate ... [beat] ... except that 50 quid."his mate: "why, you miserable, tight-arsed ..." [cut]
why bother with the comeback? what the fuck point did it serve?
i also watched "still game" last night. it was several leagues funnier. i want to like saxondale - and it's still very good in parts - but on the whole ... meh.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 09:53 (nineteen years ago)
-- Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifl...), July 4th, 2006 11:44 AM. (nedtrifle) (later) (link)
I didn't like it and didn't want to & didn't remember. not too long before it came on the telly, someone told me "saxondale is on, later". then I went to my bedroom
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 09:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 10:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 10:03 (nineteen years ago)
― David Orton (scarlet), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 10:07 (nineteen years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 11:19 (nineteen years ago)
'should've called yourself Iris' was funny, as was 'face like a beekeeper's apprentice' but neither were the line that i laughed at the first time around.
― koogy wonderland (koogs), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 09:15 (nineteen years ago)
So Saxondale could get angry and say "Don't upset yourself!" and gas him!
I think the fabled funny line was re: the pepper pot - "I've been to Chessington World of Adventures". At least, that was the only bit that had me laughing tea out of my nose.
― melton mowbray's APOCALYPTO! (adr), Wednesday, 5 July 2006 09:26 (nineteen years ago)
partridge did it, too, but he did some other stuff, as well
this programme is rubbish
― RJG (RJG), Monday, 17 July 2006 20:53 (nineteen years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Monday, 17 July 2006 21:00 (nineteen years ago)
I quite like it.
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 17 July 2006 21:02 (nineteen years ago)
missed last night's, or rather listened to it rather than watched it. nothing struck me as esp funny.
― koogy wonderland (koogs), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 15:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Mädchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 15:54 (nineteen years ago)
I dunno though, I'm still basically enjoying this, even though it's not making me laugh very often. I think Tommy Saxondale is just about realistic enough that it works as a pleasant little character study, which makes up for the fact that it's mostly failing as a sitcom. When I was at school, my best friend's dad was exactly like him, and that familiarity feels quite nice.
― JimD (JimD), Tuesday, 18 July 2006 18:15 (nineteen years ago)
see ya...
― koogy wonderland (koogs), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 08:08 (nineteen years ago)
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20060710144312AA2yjkl
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 08:14 (nineteen years ago)
Anyway - i'm still enjoying it (Saxondale that is).
― Ned T.Rifle (nedtrifle), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 08:52 (nineteen years ago)
he hates her so much but there's a bit of him that desperately wants her to like him, to be impressed with him, and she sees that, and twists the knife again and again
unfortunately it doesn't GO anywhere after that
"a former rock roadie turned, umm, pest exterminator, who has anger-management issues" -- this is a great basis for a show, but it has turned out somehow to be the POINT of the show, which is bizarre; the cosby show was based on a well-off black family living in the city - but if that had been the POINT of the cosby show it would have been sunk from the beginning
there's political and cultural resonances that could be sketched between coogan's character and britain/western europe in the 21st century (i.e. both are bloated and over the hill; both have settled into a convenient rut; both are addicted to massive useless gas-guzzling toys) but i doubt the show is canny enough to exploit them
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 10:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 10:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 10:38 (nineteen years ago)
i just don't think the half-hour sitcom format suits the character. he'd have been better in a sketch-show format, perhaps ... but then the british sketch-show has become nothing more than an exercise in repetition ad absurdum, so at least he's been spared that fate ;)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 10:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 10:53 (nineteen years ago)
I watched this last night and enjoyed it. Whatever it is I like about it, it is not necessarily its funniness. Something to do with an unerringly accurate portrayal of desperation and alientaion.
One thing about last night's episode - the lenghty speech about hi-fi equipment. I would like to know if it passed muster, or whether hi-fi enthusiasts are grumbling about it, like peole here were saying that no way would he like Brian Eno because he has a beard or whatever.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 10:56 (nineteen years ago)
= dull?
― Roughage Crew (Enrique), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 10:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 11:01 (nineteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 11:07 (nineteen years ago)
-- Konal Doddz (stevem7...), July 4th, 2006 12:03 PM
i've just realised...the guy he played in The Parole Officer WAS, I think, likeable. So he CAN do it.
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 11:14 (nineteen years ago)
> the lenghty speech about hi-fi equipment. I would like to know if it passed muster
it sounded reasonable enough to me but i'm several years off the boil when it comes to names and model numbers so... i can't decide whether he was talking the talk whilst having a very nothingy mid-end system* or what. (he mentioned Wharfedale Diamond 8s and they are beloved of What Hi-Fi etc but i don't think audiophile magazines would touch them with a pole, too cheap!)(*like mine)
― koogy wonderland (koogs), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 11:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 11:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 11:24 (nineteen years ago)
can't remember the sixth character
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 11:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 11:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 12:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Tracey Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 14:21 (nineteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 15:16 (nineteen years ago)
this reminds me of the twin/brothers characters from Coogan's Run and their 'stout yeoman of the bar' thing altho that was more studenty (i.e. young Saxondale, sort of). it's a recurring thing in Coogan work. you get the impression he just loves language (even tho the characters using it in this way usually come across as irritating or pretentious for doing so).
― Konal Doddz (blueski), Tuesday, 25 July 2006 15:37 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/leadballoon/
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Wednesday, 25 October 2006 10:52 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to welcome our new stingray masters (chap), Wednesday, 25 October 2006 10:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Koogy Yonderboy (koogs), Wednesday, 25 October 2006 11:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Wednesday, 25 October 2006 13:58 (nineteen years ago)
― benrique (Enrique), Wednesday, 25 October 2006 14:00 (nineteen years ago)
None of these shows really deserve a thread of their own, however.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 25 October 2006 15:21 (nineteen years ago)
― RoxyMuzak© (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 25 October 2006 18:49 (nineteen years ago)
― benrique (Enrique), Thursday, 26 October 2006 08:12 (nineteen years ago)
Watched "One Hour Photo" last night. Should have been a one hour film.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Thursday, 26 October 2006 08:17 (nineteen years ago)
― benrique (Enrique), Thursday, 26 October 2006 08:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 26 October 2006 08:29 (nineteen years ago)
― benrique (Enrique), Thursday, 26 October 2006 08:37 (nineteen years ago)
Series 2 has started. Not much different, really. He's grown his own hair instead of wearing a wig.
― bham, Friday, 24 August 2007 08:07 (eighteen years ago)
dolphin impression made me laugh.
― koogs, Friday, 24 August 2007 09:20 (eighteen years ago)
oh, man. i'll have to torrent it because it didn't seem to do too well on bbc america. (bbc america's "comedy saturdays" now consist of some shite remake of dr. jekyll/mr. hyde and graham norton. COMEDY!)
― GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Friday, 24 August 2007 09:25 (eighteen years ago)
err... the first season didn't do too well, that is. so i'm guessing they won't show the second.
ah, bollocks. meant to have a look at this new series. didn't. hey ho.
― grimly fiendish, Friday, 24 August 2007 22:25 (eighteen years ago)
if only the BBC would come up with some kind of clever internet-based way to watch shows again.
one that FUCKING WORKED ON MY MAC, that is.
anyone bothering?
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 15:54 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, last weeks was pretty good. First time I'd seen it really.
Recommended.
― Mark G, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 15:55 (eighteen years ago)
i'm just doing thursday's TV pages and thinking, ah, saxondale ... yeh, shit, not watched any of this series at all yet. buggering fuck.
― grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 16:28 (eighteen years ago)
Mark G OTM, last week's was a definite improvement on the first series.
― Neil S, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 17:02 (eighteen years ago)
wasn't the odd druggy squatter in last series too?
― koogs, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 17:51 (eighteen years ago)
Episode #1.4 (10 July 2006) - Tommy Saxondale/Gay Mancunian Heroin Addict, Executive Producer, Writer
I KNEW I hadn't dreamt it!
― Not the real Village People, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 18:41 (eighteen years ago)
last week's was a definite improvement on the first series.
-- Neil S, Tuesday, 11 September 2007 17:02 (3 days ago) Bookmark Link
Whereas Last night's was so-so with a couple of good bits.
― Mark G, Friday, 14 September 2007 11:42 (eighteen years ago)
Missed it, instead I was forced to watch John Hurt getting in a huff because he wasn't related to the Marquis of Sligo.
― Neil S, Friday, 14 September 2007 11:53 (eighteen years ago)
that being the 'devastating revelation' they highlit all yesterday then?
― Mark G, Friday, 14 September 2007 11:56 (eighteen years ago)
Pretty much. He looked pretty grumpy about it. Only actors could have the colossal self-regard to believe that their family tree is inherently of interest to the viewing public.
― Neil S, Friday, 14 September 2007 12:07 (eighteen years ago)
It all looked so false as well. Like, take 2, look of grumpy disbelief.
Saxondale was dull last night I thought. I think I'm starting to missed canned laughter.
― Ned Trifle II, Friday, 14 September 2007 12:10 (eighteen years ago)
I don't see why anyone should care, either. There seemed to be a large element of snobbery to his reaction.
― Neil S, Friday, 14 September 2007 12:22 (eighteen years ago)
(> that being the 'devastating revelation' they highlit all yesterday then?
wasn't the devastating revelation, the one where he looked grumpy in the trailers, the fact that they were first cousins?)
saxondale, i realised last night, is very formulaic, similar structure every week. but still funny. neighbour in glastonbury t-shirt.
mitchell and webb, on immediately afterwards, had me lolling much more though. the swimming pool, the vicar, the nativity, numberwangk...
― koogs, Friday, 14 September 2007 12:36 (eighteen years ago)
...it was all about the Green Clarinet for me.
― NickB, Friday, 14 September 2007 12:43 (eighteen years ago)
Numberwang: the poor man's quizzlestick.
― Neil S, Friday, 14 September 2007 12:51 (eighteen years ago)
Coogan revives Alan Partridge for tour:
http://www.chortle.co.uk/shows/tour/s/15969/steve_coogan_is_alan_partridge_and_other_less_successful_characters
― StanM, Thursday, 13 March 2008 09:50 (eighteen years ago)
This is the most baffling thread in all of ilx to me. I love this show. I think the character is so well-drawn and completely compelling; I think it's poignant and relatable; I think the jokes are hilarious.
― Savannah Smiles, Thursday, 13 March 2008 11:39 (eighteen years ago)
Still want to see this!
― rox qua rox (roxymuzak), Saturday, 20 December 2008 02:05 (seventeen years ago)
^^
but having got the DVDs for christmas man is there a difference in tone between the series. tommy's much less exaggerated in his mannerisms, the wonderfully horible blonde woman is scaled back a bit... it's weird. i'm only on the first episode of the second series, though, still funny.
― what we do is secrete (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Monday, 29 December 2008 09:42 (seventeen years ago)
can he top 'dr terrible's house of horrible'?
― Seriously, Try Punching This Guy in the Face and See What Happens (Enrique), Monday, June 19, 2006 12:36 PM (2 years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
zing!
― Brohan Hari, Monday, 29 December 2008 12:41 (seventeen years ago)
both seasons are out on dvd in the us soon. you know why? because my wife got the UK dvds for me for christmas. i think they were actually cheaper though (the us one is supposed to be $40), even with shipping. why are the spaced dvds so expensive, also?
how you doin?
― HELPING CHILDREN THROUGH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Friday, 16 January 2009 12:48 (seventeen years ago)
i'm doing ok
― cutty, Friday, 16 January 2009 12:49 (seventeen years ago)
good to hear
― HELPING CHILDREN THROUGH RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Friday, 16 January 2009 13:44 (seventeen years ago)
watching the second disc of the first season now. i like this show. i'd have a beer or smoke a joint with tommy.
― ian, Monday, 11 May 2009 23:21 (seventeen years ago)
finally got around to seeing this, the first series anyway. not especially 'hilarious' but the episodes improve as the series goes on and every episode is enjoyable, even if 95% of the music references seem horridly forced in
― BIG HOOTY aka the Sapperticker (electricsound), Thursday, 30 December 2010 08:50 (fifteen years ago)
I've just started watching 9 1/2 Weeks (Director's Cut). I'll let you know what I think of it on January 1st.― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 26 October 2006
― the pinefox, Thursday, 30 December 2010 11:27 (fifteen years ago)
i wonder, if specner chow will see it.
I finally watched this and really enjoyed it. Definitely a grower (had to start it a few times to get into it). The only weird thing was that I didn't think he really showed very much anger!
― Spencer Chow, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 22:32 (fifteen years ago)
Just started watching this. Half way through season one - each episode getting better. I think Tommy's facial tics and banter are hilarious. Also baffled that this didn't get more love.
― paulhw, Tuesday, 26 April 2011 14:08 (fifteen years ago)
wtf this thread is 5 years old, and i've never heard of this before
― if you wanna gamble, take that shit to vegas (Ste), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 14:13 (fifteen years ago)
I thought this thread revive was about this http://www.totalfilm.com/news/steve-coogan-confirms-alan-partridge-movie-shoots-next-year
― Cluster the boots (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 26 April 2011 14:18 (fifteen years ago)