Do Google make a word processor yet?
― Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 10 November 2006 13:56 (nineteen years ago)
― David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 10 November 2006 13:58 (nineteen years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Friday, 10 November 2006 13:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Takin' Funk to Heaven in '77) (Dada), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:00 (nineteen years ago)
― wogan lenin (dog latin), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Forest Pines (ForestPines), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:04 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:04 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:05 (nineteen years ago)
Me too, Ed.
― Forest Pines (ForestPines), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:06 (nineteen years ago)
(goes back to napping flint)
― Django Blowhardt (Rock Hardy), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:08 (nineteen years ago)
― === temporary username === (Mark C), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:14 (nineteen years ago)
― 2 american 4 u (blueski), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:14 (nineteen years ago)
anyway, it doesnt matter if word is shit because .doc is all anyone accepts now.
also, last weekend my brother-in-law was telling me how great google's word processor is for collaborative projects. im going to check it out even though i dont play well with others.
― sunny successor (katharine), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:15 (nineteen years ago)
This is how Nazi Germany started
― you win again, gravity! (tissp), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:24 (nineteen years ago)
You can do this in Word too surely?
― Dadaismus (Takin' Funk to Heaven in '77) (Dada), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:31 (nineteen years ago)
― benrique (Enrique), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:31 (nineteen years ago)
― you win again, gravity! (tissp), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:31 (nineteen years ago)
― you win again, gravity! (tissp), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Django Blowhardt (Rock Hardy), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Scorpion Tea (Dick Butkus), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:42 (nineteen years ago)
― sunny successor (katharine), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Takin' Funk to Heaven in '77) (Dada), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:48 (nineteen years ago)
InDesign.
― benrique (Enrique), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:49 (nineteen years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:49 (nineteen years ago)
― sunny successor agrees: gay dad always trumps slutty mom (katharine), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Scorpion Tea (Dick Butkus), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:55 (nineteen years ago)
― you win again, gravity! (tissp), Friday, 10 November 2006 14:56 (nineteen years ago)
― geoff (gcannon), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Scorpion Tea (Dick Butkus), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Allyzay Eisenschefter (allyzay), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Allyzay Eisenschefter (allyzay), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:12 (nineteen years ago)
I rather like Writeroom for getting text in and do the formatting later. I use Mac TextEdit a lot a lock it down to PDF for passing around.
― Ed (dali), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:19 (nineteen years ago)
I've never used anything except Word, it doesn't seem too bad to me for what I have to do with it, but then again I guess I have nothing to compare it to.
― Revivalist (Revivalist), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:20 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to welcome our new stingray masters (chap), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Allyzay Eisenschefter (allyzay), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:21 (nineteen years ago)
you have trained yourself to follow the microsoft style guide?
― benrique (Enrique), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:23 (nineteen years ago)
You don't use bulletpoints much then. They have a mind of their own in Word.
― Bob Six (bobbysix), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:25 (nineteen years ago)
Yeah, either I want format control or I'm just keyboarding, so I only use TextEdit or InDesign for myself.
― Django Blowhardt (Rock Hardy), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:25 (nineteen years ago)
Nope, just went in to Tools then Options then Spelling then unticked "Check spelling/grammar as you type"
― Revivalist (Revivalist), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:27 (nineteen years ago)
― geoff (gcannon), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Mr. Que (Mr.Que), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:50 (nineteen years ago)
― ONIMO ph34rz teh NOIZE (GerryNemo), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Paul Eater (eater), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:54 (nineteen years ago)
HINT: BUILD STYLES FOR YOUR DOCUMENTS. USE THEM.
If you aren't using styles using word really is a battle of yr willpower vs. the machine. I finally started doing it this week and it's like WHY DOES IT BE COOPERATING?!?
― LISTEN U TURBO CROUTON (TOMBOT), Friday, 10 November 2006 15:59 (nineteen years ago)
― ONIMO ph34rz teh NOIZE (GerryNemo), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Dadaismus (Takin' Funk to Heaven in '77) (Dada), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:00 (nineteen years ago)
― ONIMO ph34rz teh NOIZE (GerryNemo), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Allyzay Eisenschefter (allyzay), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:04 (nineteen years ago)
― tremendoid (tremendoid), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth S. (Ex Leon), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:15 (nineteen years ago)
― sunny successor agrees: gay dad always trumps slutty mom (katharine), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:16 (nineteen years ago)
Also Word HTML makes my blood boil. Word HTML emails arrive containing one line of text in a single fairly plain style and are somehow 200k. Which probably shouldn't bother me in this age of quarter-terabyte disks, but it does. Maybe a flashback to the summer I spent removing all Word's nonstandard tags from vast documents of tedious legalese only for someone to tell me the next day that they'd made some change I'd never find and I should put the new one up.
Having said that, if I want a wordprocessed document I use Word, and nothing about it has irritated me enough to make me find something else (though I used and much preferred WordPerfect last time I regularly did wordprocessing, but that was nearly a decade ago). And at least Office isn't Microsoft Works.
― Rebecca (reb), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:16 (nineteen years ago)
― LISTEN U TURBO CROUTON (TOMBOT), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:19 (nineteen years ago)
― LISTEN U TURBO CROUTON (TOMBOT), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:21 (nineteen years ago)
― teh_kit returns! (g-kit), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:24 (nineteen years ago)
my big problem is that it's a big slow clunky program and it takes TEN MINUTES i swear to open up a document, what with opening splash screens asking me, do you want to open up a ppt? a worksheet? UHH DID I CLIKC TEH BIG BLUE W OR BIG X OR RED P, U TELL ME
― geoff (gcannon), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Allyzay Eisenschefter (allyzay), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:30 (nineteen years ago)
― benrique (Enrique), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:33 (nineteen years ago)
now i just want to go home and muck about with the prefs to see how bare-bones you can get it to be.
― geoff (gcannon), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:33 (nineteen years ago)
Styles make things 500x easier, it's true... until you go back to an old document and decide to add some new text, when it seems to pick a style at random and adds some crap like bold and underline, a tab stop, and a bullet completely unlike all your other bullets, and then insists it hasn't added any formatting so it won't turn it off. Gnn.
― Rebecca (reb), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:40 (nineteen years ago)
"IT LOOKS LIKE YOU'RE WRITING A LIST"
DIE pajbncakjbskhb
― Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:49 (nineteen years ago)
― geoff (gcannon), Friday, 10 November 2006 16:54 (nineteen years ago)
― don weiner (don weiner), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:01 (nineteen years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:01 (nineteen years ago)
― deej.. (deej..), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:09 (nineteen years ago)
OTFM
Every job I'v every done since I was about 16 I have built a template in word to fit whatever styles I have to work with. It tames a lot of shit, especially rogue typesetting (autonumbering still gets fucked, especially if you use outline numbering)
― Ed (dali), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:13 (nineteen years ago)
I have been staring at my out-of-date CV in Word all week making changes and putting them back again and now this thread must feel my RAGE! Sorry.
On the plus side, when I perform the simplest of tasks in Word or Excel my mother/coworkers stare at me like I am a genius decoding a cryptic long-dead language and I get to feel undeservedly clever for the rest of the day (or until it refuses to print right), which is nice.
― Rebecca (reb), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:27 (nineteen years ago)
haha. gold.
― sunny successor agrees: gay dad always trumps slutty mom (katharine), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:33 (nineteen years ago)
And you mention this to a Microsoft loyalist and they'll reply, "Oh, you can just turn that feature off." WHY HAVE IT ON IN THE FIRST PLACE?
It's like buying a car that sounds its horn continuously when you turn the ignition in case there's any oncoming traffic coming at you in the parking lot, and the only way to disable it is to put it in neutral, turn your windshield wipers on, and press a button located underneath the carpet in the trunk.
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:33 (nineteen years ago)
― geoff (gcannon), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:38 (nineteen years ago)
As one.
I like Word, though. I've used it for so long that I know which parts of it I can control and which parts demand abject surrender (styles, indeed. See also section breaks). I also tend to need to create monstrous documents with billions of foot or end notes and tables of contents and indexes and outlines and bookmarks, thus necessitating a lot of the features that are just bloat otherwise.
My employer has held fast to the WordPerfect ship, which makes me love and appreciate MS Word even more.
― Party Time Country Female (pullapartgirl), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:39 (nineteen years ago)
― geoff (gcannon), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:39 (nineteen years ago)
― sunny successor agrees: gay dad always trumps slutty mom (katharine), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)
OTM! I didn't know this either.
― diebold with a vengeance (nickalicious), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:42 (nineteen years ago)
― geoff (gcannon), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:48 (nineteen years ago)
These are the same people that when you're giving them a web address, ask "Now do I have to put the http, colon, slash, slash before that?"
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:51 (nineteen years ago)
HEY CHECK OUT MICR0SOFT'S NEW SLOGAN, YO!
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 10 November 2006 17:57 (nineteen years ago)
-- Pleasant Plains /// (pleasant.plain...) (webmail), Today 11:51 AM. (Pleasant Plains ///) (later)
or 'is that all one word?'
― sunny successor agrees: gay dad always trumps slutty mom (katharine), Friday, 10 November 2006 18:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Friday, 10 November 2006 18:05 (nineteen years ago)
LaTeX all the way; imported to InDesign for the really tricksy shit.
― stet (stet), Friday, 10 November 2006 18:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Friday, 10 November 2006 18:39 (nineteen years ago)
― stet (stet), Friday, 10 November 2006 18:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Friday, 10 November 2006 18:53 (nineteen years ago)
― stet (stet), Friday, 10 November 2006 19:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Friday, 10 November 2006 19:27 (nineteen years ago)
So OTM.
― Django Blowhardt (Rock Hardy), Friday, 10 November 2006 19:36 (nineteen years ago)
I even use it for letters, because after setting up one letter template, I can just bash out the text, compile it and print the PDF. I'm not certain this is absolutely better than a well-trimmed Word document template, but for a certain mindset (ie mine) it's more satisfying, way less frustrating and far more portable. xpost
― stet (stet), Friday, 10 November 2006 19:41 (nineteen years ago)
This is funny, though, because Mac people are always like "you plug it in and everything just works" and I go "yeah but it only works the way it wants to and never lets you configure shit!"
Hence I always feel like Word = Microsoft's most Mac-like product (i.e., it impresses people by automatically doing stuff the average user probably wants it to, but if you want anything else in the universe to happen it's a giant pain in the ass).
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 10 November 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)
Word 5.1 was close to killer, though (stupid styles aside), and that really was Mac-like. After Word 6.0 was attacked on all sides for being un-Mac-like, Microsoft commissioned research into what the term "Mac-like" really meant. It turned out it means "like Word 5.1".
― stet (stet), Friday, 10 November 2006 19:48 (nineteen years ago)
I am generally in favor of having to configure everything possible, but that's in part because I always have lower-end computers that need help and jerry-rigging to make them do cool stuff.
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 10 November 2006 19:50 (nineteen years ago)
No! IT IS NOT ALL ONE WORD! It's several words that happen to be written next to each other, without spaces in between. This does not make several words into one word!
― mei (mei), Saturday, 11 November 2006 12:07 (nineteen years ago)
Doesn't make them stupid. It's just something I'd assume one would get on the second try and not something that would actually require you to telephone the radio station for clarification.
You know how your car radio has the scan feature and also the buttons where you can pre-program the stations? If your radio was designed by MS Word, it would start scanning as soon as you turned the radio on and pre-program the first ten stations for you, whether they were gospel or not.
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Saturday, 11 November 2006 16:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Scorpion Tea (Dick Butkus), Saturday, 11 November 2006 16:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Saturday, 11 November 2006 17:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Scorpion Tea (Dick Butkus), Saturday, 11 November 2006 17:20 (nineteen years ago)
Pretty much all OTM
I don't like the WYSIWYG editors though, mostly because they make my job harder -- they're too device-dependent in my experience. I can see how they'd be great if you were making documents that wouldn't have to stand up to being worked over on other systems (translation for web publishing, in my case). Macros packages from the editors throw a big monkeywrench into the works, especially.
I actually haven't used TeX in conjunction with InDesign, but the combination intrigues me enough that I'll probably try it even though I don't really have a reason to.
Word can suck it.
― daniel striped tiger (OutDatWay), Saturday, 11 November 2006 18:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 11 November 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Ed (dali), Saturday, 11 November 2006 18:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 11 November 2006 19:39 (nineteen years ago)
xpost way up there about the law industry using word perfect. It really depends on the size of the firm. In the last six years, I have not seen this in the two firms I have worked at and the other mid-large to large firms that we exchange documents with. The firm I started at in 2000 had just made the change from WP, and the firm I am at now has been on Office since 2001, I believe. Sure when you have under 20 or so attorney's you may still have WP. I expect this to die out completely when the introduction of Office 2007. I don't know how well WP is going to hand the docx files, or how smooth the conversion will be.
― Jeff. (Jeff), Saturday, 11 November 2006 19:41 (nineteen years ago)
LaTeX is def the way forward, at least after the steep learning curve. have never tried textmate, though, i've only used mactex (i think? suddenly having doubts as to its name).
― toby (tsg20), Sunday, 12 November 2006 13:10 (nineteen years ago)
― mei (mei), Sunday, 12 November 2006 18:47 (nineteen years ago)
Play about with other numbers for even more fun!
― you win again, gravity! (tissp), Sunday, 12 November 2006 19:12 (nineteen years ago)
― you win again, gravity! (tissp), Sunday, 12 November 2006 19:13 (nineteen years ago)
You can also get a RSS feed of your "published" documents which is rather cool.
― lyra (lyra), Monday, 13 November 2006 22:01 (nineteen years ago)
I think WP is still pretty much king in legal academe, however, at least according to a couple of perfessers I know
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 13 November 2006 22:47 (nineteen years ago)
It lets you select NONCONTINUOUS BLOCKS OF TEXT.
WHY IN THE C*NTING WORLD IS THIS NOT POSSIBLE IN ANY OTHER WORD PROCESSING PROGRAM?
it's not like it's some bizarre thing, Photoshop absolutely depends on it, for instance. say you want to make, i dunno, three phrases in the current paragraph italic? do them one at a time. SORRY MSOFT CANNOT HANDLE YOUR CRAZY "non-linear" request DUDER.
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 13 November 2006 22:51 (nineteen years ago)
in Photoshop, you can say "the cream, the eggs, the flour, and the sugar i am buying." in every text editor/word processor besides Nisus Writer (to my knowledge), one must say "the cream i am buying. the flour i am buying. the sugar i am buying." so yeah OK i guess i should use styles. but i practically wouldn't need them (for my purposes) if i could just select two different chunks of text at once.
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 13 November 2006 23:00 (nineteen years ago)
― geoff (gcannon), Monday, 13 November 2006 23:37 (nineteen years ago)
― geoff (gcannon), Monday, 13 November 2006 23:38 (nineteen years ago)
― def zep (calstars), Monday, 13 November 2006 23:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 13 November 2006 23:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 13 November 2006 23:42 (nineteen years ago)
you can test drive the whole suite via a citrix session.
― Jeff. (Jeff), Monday, 13 November 2006 23:42 (nineteen years ago)
― stet (stet), Monday, 13 November 2006 23:58 (nineteen years ago)
― S- (sgh), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 00:09 (nineteen years ago)
― ONIMO ph34rz teh NOIZE (GerryNemo), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 10:15 (nineteen years ago)
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 12:02 (nineteen years ago)
― CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 12:03 (nineteen years ago)
― brr (fandango), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 12:10 (nineteen years ago)
this is the worst computer application of all time
― no hongro (J0rdan S.), Friday, 16 October 2009 16:27 (sixteen years ago)
almost nothing brings me closer to murderous rage than word autoformat
did they fix the bullet point system in the recent versions?
― abanana, Friday, 16 October 2009 16:35 (sixteen years ago)
the old system:
· click on the bullet point button and start a list· try to edit the list and get bullet points where you don't want them· delete your file and start over because you can't get rid of the bullet points
― abanana, Friday, 16 October 2009 16:39 (sixteen years ago)
little problem I've been having with Word lately is documents somehow turning double-spaced with no apparent way to fix it. Not as good a wtf as finding out that Word has no idea what to do with a Microsoft Works Word Processor document, though.
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Friday, 16 October 2009 19:18 (sixteen years ago)
It is very frustrating to deal with, especially when half the time I'm dealing with students who are in tears because Word autoformat has completely messed up their paper.
― Nicolars (Nicole), Friday, 16 October 2009 19:28 (sixteen years ago)
i use neooffice because i refuse to pay for something as shitty as word but i'm afraid it might actually be worse than word
― steamed hams (harbl), Friday, 16 October 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)
hahaha i know that bullet point problem well, too
― steamed hams (harbl), Friday, 16 October 2009 19:30 (sixteen years ago)
today when i was writing notes out in word — which i would NEVER ever do, but i was going off of a teacher's study guide and didn't feel like c/p-ing into a google doc - word started switching from colored & empty bullet points to lowercase letters & roman numerals like halfway through the doc
just baffling
― no hongro (J0rdan S.), Friday, 16 October 2009 19:31 (sixteen years ago)
ok srsly what the hell are you guys doing that's causing this level of bullet point confusion?????? I mean, I sometimes have issues when I go back in and add things but never like what you're all describing (ESP J0rdan, that is beyond baffling and verging on arcane).
― RETARTED (HI DERE), Friday, 16 October 2009 19:51 (sixteen years ago)
just pressing tab, enter & backspace pretty much
― no hongro (J0rdan S.), Friday, 16 October 2009 19:57 (sixteen years ago)
It seems to happen a lot, if all the times I'm asked to help out with bullet point disasters is anything to go by.
― Nicolars (Nicole), Friday, 16 October 2009 20:01 (sixteen years ago)
If you aren't using styles using word really is a battle of yr willpower vs. the machine.
qft
― W i l l, Friday, 16 October 2009 20:02 (sixteen years ago)
the biggest thing I hate about Word is how long it takes to launch every time you open a new document. You have a document open already, you'd think it could open a second one within the application instead of having to open a whole other application. And why does a document take so long to open anyway?
The best thing about word is the 'View Side by Side' function, with synchronous scrolling. That's the only reason I haven't lost my mind over various difficulties.
― A polar bear you can see in a snowstorm (rockapads), Friday, 16 October 2009 21:33 (sixteen years ago)
yep. even so, it's probably my least favorite application EVER. thank the gods I don't have to use it often.
― feed them to the (Linden Ave) lions (will), Saturday, 17 October 2009 15:14 (sixteen years ago)
LaTeX
― a perfect urkel (gbx), Saturday, 17 October 2009 15:18 (sixteen years ago)
Automatically numbered lists where the space between the number and the start of your text is too long: sucky!Accidentally moving the little paragraph formatting bar way over to the left outside of your document and being unable to put it back: annoying!!Wanting to change the indentation of your line of text but inserting another fucking tab instead: arrrgh!!!
― Mr. Snrub, Saturday, 17 October 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)
So yes, word is shit. But openoffice and wordperfect are A HUNDRED times worse.
― Mr. Snrub, Saturday, 17 October 2009 15:44 (sixteen years ago)
All of Office 08 for Mac runs like shit. Slow to the point of being broken. But what are you gonna do? Not format your resume as a Word doc?
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Saturday, 17 October 2009 16:12 (sixteen years ago)
well i make everything a pdf anyway so .odt works fine. i wish people would stop emailing doc and docx tbh. it's rude. way quicker to open preview to look at something.
― steamed hams (harbl), Saturday, 17 October 2009 16:28 (sixteen years ago)
I get the impression that most employers prefer a .doc, and begrudgingly accept pdfs. Not a lot of human services people sitting in front of a mac.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Saturday, 17 October 2009 17:20 (sixteen years ago)
textedit - indesign if i wanna get fancy
― ice cr?m, Saturday, 17 October 2009 17:21 (sixteen years ago)
i have reached a point where if it's just me vs word i will win pretty easily. but word can always rely on other people to regain the upper hand. "hey, i did a bunch of edits to that document you were working on and i totally fucked up the formatting. have fun!"
― aarrissi-a-roni, Saturday, 17 October 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)
.docx is a fucking scourge
― tehresa, Saturday, 17 October 2009 18:41 (sixteen years ago)
Not as good a wtf as finding out that Word has no idea what to do with a Microsoft Works Word Processor document, though.
on the fucking money. this has been re-baffling me for the last five years as i go back and try to refer to the HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS of Works files i have from the past. i mean fair enough, i was a stupid kid who didn't know about the beautiful portability of rich text files yet. but not supporting proprietary document formats that your own company created? die in more fires than the world already wants you to die in, Microsoft.
― what kind of nickname is Steve when your real name is Jesus (reddening), Saturday, 17 October 2009 20:07 (sixteen years ago)
I've disqualified potential employers because they asked for a resume in .doc format.
― Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 17 October 2009 20:18 (sixteen years ago)
since when is a pdf mac only?????
― a perfect urkel (gbx), Saturday, 17 October 2009 20:21 (sixteen years ago)
is openoffice any good?
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 17 October 2009 20:22 (sixteen years ago)
no, but it's free
― steamed hams (harbl), Saturday, 17 October 2009 20:24 (sixteen years ago)
yeah you can still open a pdf on windows!! word and acrobat reader will open slowly and crash equally ^_^
― steamed hams (harbl), Saturday, 17 October 2009 20:26 (sixteen years ago)
if i had to send my painstakingly designed resume in doc to be opened in word i would prob cry.
so is any word processing program good?
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 17 October 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)
It's not, obviously, but some people are still scared of anything that's not a doc file. I ain't saying it makes sense.
I have a nice version of my resume, designed in InDesign and exported to pdf. Then I have a Word doc, which, you know, works. The Word doc isn't half as annoying, though, as having to fill out an ill-conceived online form because that's the only way they will accept the resume. For Monster.com or the like, it makes sense to have lists of skills and positions so they can be cross-referenced and searched. No, just one job, with one employer who is a little too proud of its grasp of HTML forms. Maddening.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Saturday, 17 October 2009 20:54 (sixteen years ago)
I never have any trouble with Word.
― Jeff, Saturday, 17 October 2009 22:40 (sixteen years ago)
J0rdan's issue sounds like bullet/numbering styles have been changed from the default -- try restoring them to defaults.
― Super Smize (Leee), Sunday, 18 October 2009 01:22 (sixteen years ago)
Does it have any "useful" features except that it allows you to type stuff into it, and makes it appear, ON A SCREEN.
This is about all I can do.
Some headhunter-author slickster I had a free "seminar" with says always send a PDF resume, cuz there's no guarantee Word is going to look good on the other end. I know nothing about making a PDF resume and am ignorantly refusing to investigate...
― Your Favorite Saturday Night Thing (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 18 October 2009 01:29 (sixteen years ago)
love the mac 'print to pdf' function
― tehresa, Sunday, 18 October 2009 02:09 (sixteen years ago)
Not Mac-specific, either, if you have Acrobat Pro.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Sunday, 18 October 2009 02:16 (sixteen years ago)
Does .docx have any value whatsoever or is it just some dumb plan to get everybody to upgrade their software?
― sarahel, Sunday, 18 October 2009 02:19 (sixteen years ago)
fancier formatting?
― tehresa, Sunday, 18 October 2009 02:25 (sixteen years ago)
Actually, less "fancy" formatting. The text is ASCII, using XML to style it, for much much better interoperability. A old-style .doc file was encoded and styled in inscrutable and super-secret binary bullshit code that no one else could use. So it's getting better.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Sunday, 18 October 2009 02:30 (sixteen years ago)
well... it looks fancier, is what i meant.
― tehresa, Sunday, 18 October 2009 02:39 (sixteen years ago)
but how is it getting better if fewer ppl can use a .docx than a .doc?
Because they won't make the old bad software again, so over time everyone will be able to use docx. If you're in an office, say, that decides to upgrade everyone's machines, you can share documents more easily and all kinds of other stuff. Of course, no one is doing that yet, and even when sending out the ol' resume, I can't really use docx, because like 70% of everyone won't be able to open it.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Sunday, 18 October 2009 02:42 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, and it's going to be like that for a long time, too. The hardware upgrade cycle that drove MS is slowing *way* down, which is why they can't get anybody off XP either.
― stet, Sunday, 18 October 2009 03:17 (sixteen years ago)
Well, the OS upgrades and the hardware upgrades used to be symbiotic, but MS went off the rails with that piece of shit Vista. They basically had to break the inter-dependency with Windows 7, or it would be XP forever.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Sunday, 18 October 2009 03:49 (sixteen years ago)
but os upgrades only applies to windows users. what about the rest of the world?
― tehresa, Sunday, 18 October 2009 03:51 (sixteen years ago)
and i tried to update my office w/ something to let me read docx and it wouldn't install.
― tehresa, Sunday, 18 October 2009 03:52 (sixteen years ago)
xp (Maybe you're joking but) Windows still accounts for 90% of all OS's.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Sunday, 18 October 2009 03:57 (sixteen years ago)
yeah but not even all windows users can use a .docx.at my job last year, i was running some version of windows and couldn't open it.
― tehresa, Sunday, 18 October 2009 04:01 (sixteen years ago)
When people have sent me .docx files, I've had surprising success extracting the text using...wait for it...Illustrator. But usually OpenOffice works.
― WmC, Sunday, 18 October 2009 04:03 (sixteen years ago)
xp Oh, I see what you mean. The "compatibility mode" hack is their solution for the moment, and possibly your office machine won't let you install system stuff like that? I'm only guessing. It is a hack, though, and Office files are just going to be a mess for a while.
Maybe we should all just use Google docs.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Sunday, 18 October 2009 04:05 (sixteen years ago)
Wmc -- that's the beautiful thing about them! ASCII text, XML markup.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Sunday, 18 October 2009 04:06 (sixteen years ago)
i run a mac at home, there are no limitations to what i can install, but when i tried to install microsoft's update to ms office for mac in order to read docx, it didn't work.
sorry when i said 'my office' i meant 'my version of microsoft office for mac'.
i may not have had every privilege possible on the work machine that WAS a pc but did not open .docx, so that could have been the problem. still annoying.
but google docs can fuck up formatting, too!!
― tehresa, Sunday, 18 October 2009 04:08 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, that Word for Mac update was junk. They want you to upgrade to 2008 basically, but it's not nearly as good as Word 2007 for the PC and isn't even fully compatible. I actually really like Word 07, apart from all the Word insanity they've inherited and can't get rid of (no "no style" wtf), and was pissed off at how bad the mac one is.
― stet, Sunday, 18 October 2009 04:19 (sixteen years ago)
i mean... i met all the system requirements but the update just flat out would not install!
mac office is soooooo slowwwwwwwwww
― tehresa, Sunday, 18 October 2009 04:22 (sixteen years ago)
It's bleeding ridiculous. I can literally go get a cup of coffee, come back, and still wait a couple minutes before the doc opens. What is going on there? I thought that Office 08 didn't need to run under Rosetta, so why is it like 5 times slower than 04?
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Sunday, 18 October 2009 04:33 (sixteen years ago)
srsly annoying.like, 'oh let me just pull up that spreadsheet...................... uhhhhhh can i call you back in a bit?'
― tehresa, Sunday, 18 October 2009 04:49 (sixteen years ago)
The next version is a rewrite apparently, but the last time they did that they came up with Word 6, so god knows.
I bought Nisus last year. It's pretty great, especially as it uses rtf as its file format, which everything can read, now and forever.
― stet, Sunday, 18 October 2009 05:06 (sixteen years ago)
amen.
― tehresa, Sunday, 18 October 2009 05:07 (sixteen years ago)
I hate Word for the aforementioned reasons. I hate that academic publishing houses by and large require Word docs. Like, I don't really care that much about the formatting; I wrote a bunch of words, now you guys make it look pretty if that's what you sell. Especially now that I can, just by posting a PDF to my webpage, get my paper to its intended audience, why I should have to spend 2 days per paper getting it to follow your Word specs? Note that this is harder for me b/c my papers are full of math, which is brutal to work with in Word.
― Euler, Sunday, 18 October 2009 05:25 (sixteen years ago)
i don't know kenan, something is wrong somewhere on your system, I run the same version of word under snow leopard and have no similar issues. I still don't like word but I don't have that problem.
― akm, Sunday, 18 October 2009 07:38 (sixteen years ago)
I have to use Word for Mac a lot for my newspaper. Of course we use InDesign, but people who turn in copy or articles hardly do. Word is illogical and a very 'difficult' program in a way, in that if you're not a noob all sorts of problems arise. But half of the problem surely lies with people who use it that simply don't have a clue. For one, I hate it when people add photos to a press release and have pasted them in Word. I still haven't figured out the logic behind how Word will treat a photo in a document. It's a pain to get them out, and when I do, it's always like Christmas just before opening your gifts if Preview will will show the whole picture, or has Word compressed it already, and sometimes Word has managed to ADD those square marker points INTO the picture, which means I will have to slice off the borders... Crazy.
However, the rise op PDF presents problems as well if it's a press release or text you have to edit. For you must first ALWAYS get that text out of the pdf. It's not difficult to do, but it's an extra action I can do without.
It took me tweaking Word over the course of months to finally reach a setup I can work with, most of the time. And I must admit I was surprised how fast Word for Mac has become (way faster than for my pc).
Oh, if anyone can point to me how I can make some simple macros for Word (for Mac), that would be greatly appreciated. Because that was WAY easier in earlier versions.
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 18 October 2009 10:48 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=941B3470-3AE9-4AEE-8F43-C6BB74CD1466&displaylang=en
Microsoft Office Compatibility Pack for Word, Excel, and PowerPoint 2007 File Formats ^
they should bundle it into automatic updates really though.
I don't really hate Word anymore, the alternatives all seem so much worse.
― fndgo, Sunday, 18 October 2009 10:50 (sixteen years ago)
well, apparently it's tehresa, too. And everyone, absolutely everyone, I have ever mentioned it to prior to reading this thread. It must be a known issue, but I usually get around the problem by lighting a cigarette and telling myself not to care.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Sunday, 18 October 2009 11:17 (sixteen years ago)
Oh hey, look at this!
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=425149
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Sunday, 18 October 2009 11:21 (sixteen years ago)
Goddamn MS Word sucks.
― really senile old crap shit (Eric H.), Tuesday, 1 December 2009 03:55 (sixteen years ago)
hahaha i just went through the classic
type word -> green underline -> right click, choose suggestion -> green underline -> right click, suggestion is original word, choose suggestion -> green underline
never ceases to amaze/amuse me
― vincent gallogina (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 03:15 (sixteen years ago)
i'm required to put my last name next to the page number at the bottom of my pages, but i can't figure out how to do this. is it even possible?
― goon with the wind (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)
header and footer yo
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:24 (fifteen years ago)
this is fucking retarded
― goon with the wind (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)
Yes. Show header/footer, then enter your name in the required place. It should then copy this onto every page. (xp)
I'm moving to OpenOffice but it seems quite slow and when I save as Word compatible the formatting goes awry. I have to save so others can open the documents in Word, so I'm not sure if it's worth the change.
― emil.y, Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)
this is the worst program known to mankind
just don't, for the love of god, fuck w/any section breaks
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)
it takes three hours to load and makes it impossible to do actual work
― ksh, Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)
i used to write my papers in MS Paint pixel by pixel to save myself time
lol
― goon with the wind (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:28 (fifteen years ago)
Header/footer stuff is extremely simple, dudes. It's not that bad.
Section breaks are pretty horribly done, mind you. Don't EVER try to do columns. Or tables.
― emil.y, Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:28 (fifteen years ago)
i try to use google docs as much as possible
― goon with the wind (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:29 (fifteen years ago)
― emil.y, Thursday, April 8, 2010 2:28 PM (17 seconds ago) Bookmark
i had to copy a table from SPSS into a word doc two weeks ago & i almost picked up the computer and threw it against a wall
wtf tables are one of the few word features i like
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:30 (fifteen years ago)
the page break was going haywire
― goon with the wind (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:30 (fifteen years ago)
yeah that's not surprising...word is generally terrible at importing outside stuff. doing an original table within word is easy and usually looks good tho
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:31 (fifteen years ago)
To be honest, the tables thing could just be me being rubbish at handling tables.
Auto-formatted bullet points, on the other hand. AAAAARGH FUCK YOU FUCK YOU.
Also, sneaking Microsoft spyware into your updates: DOUBLE FUCK YOU WITH A SERRATED STRAP-ON.
― emil.y, Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:32 (fifteen years ago)
Um. Sorry about that.
― emil.y, Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:33 (fifteen years ago)
oh god bullet point and numbers make me want to slay
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)
yup yup yup
― goon with the wind (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:35 (fifteen years ago)
at least it's a solid tool for making websites — produces simple, readable, valid HTML 5
― ksh, Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)
Just try editing .dot templates originally created in Word 2007 but using Word 2003. Something just goes utterly wrong every time and it's better just to start over in the old version.
And don't get me started on the fucking 2007 ribbon.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 8 April 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)
word is pretty good imo, but then i'm inculculated into microsoft office software exclusively since about 1995.
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)
we call that stockholm syndrome
― joe, Friday, 9 April 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)
not denying the possibility, it's true
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)
Been using a Beta version of MSWord 2010. Took me a while to figure out how to Undo.
― a modest crowd, not jammed (Eazy), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:58 (fifteen years ago)
.docx
why
― fuck in rainbows, ☔ (dyao), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:02 (fifteen years ago)
i like the ribbon -- a true improvement over the menu bar. they need to stop changing the interface with every version though. they must be making a lot of money in retraining people every 3 years.
― abanana, Friday, 9 April 2010 16:34 (fifteen years ago)
Took me a while to figure out how to Undo.
what, does ctrl+z not work?
― abanana, Friday, 9 April 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
tables in word suffer from a kind of principle of entropy, in that they start off pretty nice and clean and functional, but as you go on they start to collapse beneath your fingers.
the menu bar in the new version confuses me so much. i'm sure i'd be happy with it if i learned to use it, but my electronic style is being intuitive, and it seems determined to defy any intuitive thinking.
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
I really don't mind Word that much since I can navigate it so well (I mean, at least the old version that didn't fucking rearrange everything), but my BIGGEST pet peeve is when people use Word for everything. Like emailing me a picture, or printing a picture, or making a brocure, etc. OMG IT IS A WORD PROCESSOR, IT IS NOT USED FOR EVERYTHING.
― sassy boy, throwin' shade (Stevie D), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:10 (fifteen years ago)
seriously
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)
Where I work, our IT dept has not only enabled, but encouraged our 14,000 employees (who are all in healthcare, so are obviously geniuses) to use Word to create brochure, posters, fucking everything. I spend more time trying to fix posters built in Powerpoint (?!) than working on legitimate projects.
Fuck my life.
― Darin, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)
OH GOD I HATE DOCX!!!! It won't open in ANYTHING except the v new versions of Word and no one has the fucking sense to save something in another format, because docx is the default, and that's the easiest.
― sassy boy, throwin' shade (Stevie D), Saturday, 10 April 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)
the docx thing was the worst idea. i hate bullets, hate section breaks (used a lot of these in legal documents that require tables of contents and it takes as long to format as it does to write the whole thing), tables are ok. my resume looks pretty nice thanks to tables. yes i removed the borders, lol.
― harbl, Saturday, 10 April 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)
there needs to be a whole new model of word processor or maybe i should just take the time to learn LaTeX for good. because the alternatives like openoffice and wordperfect totally suck.
― harbl, Saturday, 10 April 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)
whoa how do you use tables for resumes -0-
― fuck in rainbows, ☔ (dyao), Saturday, 10 April 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)
i put my name and contact info at the top then started a two-column table. "headings" like education, experience, etc. are in the left column with descriptions on the right. and every section is divided by an empty table row. so everything stays in the same line without it fucking up the tabs when i run into another line or something. then i saved as pdf.
― harbl, Saturday, 10 April 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)
/_\ that is genius
― fuck in rainbows, ☔ (dyao), Saturday, 10 April 2010 15:49 (fifteen years ago)
er no the contact info is in the right column at the top. columns are divided like 20/80 on the page. i'm proud of myself!
― harbl, Saturday, 10 April 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)
now i'm looking at it. there are *three* columns, the middle one is just so i could easily adjust the space between the other two.
― harbl, Saturday, 10 April 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)
gonna steal harbl's idea whenever i need to write a resume again
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 10 April 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)
:D
― harbl, Saturday, 10 April 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)
can you plz post or email me yr resume (without personal data or w/e) so I can jack your layout?
What is LaTeX? I use OpenOffice which is OK but it takes about 3 months for the damn program to open.
― sassy boy, throwin' shade (Stevie D), Saturday, 10 April 2010 16:14 (fifteen years ago)
the only thing worse than word is cunty publisher. trying to format chapbooks in pub has been a fucking nightmare, so we are finally moving to indesign. hallelujah.
― just1n3, Saturday, 10 April 2010 17:41 (fifteen years ago)
it's the unpredictability that really gets me, eg:
i made a 16 page layout awhile ago for a book, which printed out all fucked up, so i made a template from the printout to allow me match the supposed page 1 with the actual page 1 (in terms of folding). so when i wanted to make another book, i used this template. BUT this time the pages all printed out in the order they were supposed to print out. so i rearranged everything. printed it out. it was all fucked up again.
― just1n3, Saturday, 10 April 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)
Been thinking for ages that an old-school dtp app like Quark 3 is a much better way of word processing. Word processors as we have them now are just descendants from the days of 128k computers, so you couldn't have text or picture boxes or stuff that made sense.
Tested this out by getting my mum started with an old Quark instead of Word and she's already making docs that are nearly impossible in Word.
― stet, Saturday, 10 April 2010 18:16 (fifteen years ago)
pages works a bit like that now, not sure why there was so much hate for it in 2006 upthread.
― joe, Saturday, 10 April 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)
It was pretty bad back then, tbf. I quite like it now, but it still treats multiple boxes and dtp-esque things as if they're an advanced feature instead of how you should start.
Trying to fit everything you want to do basically into one giant box is why word processors are so fucked up.
― stet, Saturday, 10 April 2010 18:46 (fifteen years ago)
Word is about as complex as I like anything. I treat my computer like a typewriter w/ a screen.
― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 10 April 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)
I hope everyone is using styles properly here.
― Jeff, Saturday, 10 April 2010 18:55 (fifteen years ago)
.docx sucksx yes but I gotta rep for .xlsx, Excel 2007 added some v nice stuff & generally feels a lot more functional.
Moving a Word file from one computer to another is such a goddamn formatting nightmare. Nothing during my tenure at Kinko's made me want to put a gun to my head faster than someone bringing in a .doc file, and that includes the guy who was calling me every day to share sexual fantasies about his bodybuilder wife. This is why the .pdf was invented, humans.
But .xls files? Never a problem. Why did one always work so well & the other so poorly?
― Ponies are horse children (Abbott), Saturday, 10 April 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)
Word formats the document based on the selected printer, unbelievably. So if they have a wildly different printer from the kinkos one it'll fuck up.
This and fonts is the main reason Word resumes go to shit.
― stet, Saturday, 10 April 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)
started using textedit in place of word a couple years ago and ive never looked back
i got my girlfriend to design me a fancy resume in indesign
― max, Saturday, 10 April 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)
― stet, Saturday, April 10, 2010 2:16 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
^^ otm
― max, Saturday, 10 April 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)
stet, thank you for your clear & useful answer!
I agree desktop publishing is xmillion better than Word, it's such a shame for the general public that Publisher's so crappy (since so many of them own it).
― Ponies are horse children (Abbott), Saturday, 10 April 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)
And yes everyone has a wildly different home printer than a Canon pro copier.
― Ponies are horse children (Abbott), Saturday, 10 April 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)
i actually quite like word
― thomp, Sunday, 11 April 2010 00:42 (fifteen years ago)
also third-party software not being able to open docx stuff is really their own fault, though the botched backwards-compability upgrade thing i can see why that would be annoying to people. docx is a good thing though!
― thomp, Sunday, 11 April 2010 00:45 (fifteen years ago)
FWIW Pages can open .docx files.
― Ponies are horse children (Abbott), Sunday, 11 April 2010 01:45 (fifteen years ago)
dear people who know word 2007, if i want to add a centered page number to the footer of a document, is there a way to do it that bypasses the ribbon's fucking PICTURE MENU of page number orientations that takes 15 seconds to load on my work computer?
― the international mooncake trade (reddening), Sunday, 11 April 2010 01:59 (fifteen years ago)
I know they probably spent a lot of money designing a readable serif type but 'cambria' is so fat
― dayo, Thursday, 20 October 2011 17:28 (fourteen years ago)
Word formats the document based on the selected printer, unbelievably. So if they have a wildly different printer from the kinkos one it'll fuck up.This and fonts is the main reason Word resumes go to shit.
That's what PDF is for.
Many years ago I frequently used WordPerfect and it too formats for the selected printer when a document is brought up on a different computer. Just like web pages are formatted for whatever screen size you have.
― Everything else is secondary (Lee626), Thursday, 20 October 2011 18:09 (fourteen years ago)
You only have one browser window size; you can have lots of different paper sizes in the one printer. And you making your window small doesn't break the page for me.
If WordPerfect does this it's wrong too. The right way is to use and show the document size set in Page Setup, and complain at print time if it won't fit.
PDF isn't for this, it's for read-only. You should be able to collaborate on a document without it going to shit because someone has some fucked up dot matrix Epson hooked up.
― stet, Thursday, 20 October 2011 18:15 (fourteen years ago)
I'd forgotten that about WordPerfect. The amount of time that must have cost me back in the day. WordStar for life, suckaz!!!
― triple black belt in ILX-fu (snoball), Thursday, 20 October 2011 18:26 (fourteen years ago)
Damn was WordStar primitive though. Early versions were like trying to compose a document in the vidiprinter from Grandstand.
― triple black belt in ILX-fu (snoball), Thursday, 20 October 2011 18:28 (fourteen years ago)
Plain text is the one true format.
Is there a vim vs. emacs thread?
― medium rear (silby), Thursday, 20 October 2011 19:09 (fourteen years ago)
Actually, IIRC WordPerfect allowed you to override the formats-to-default-printer upon file retrival, so that it's always formatted for the original document creator's printer of choice. WordPerfect document files more closely resemble HTML than an MS Word .doc file.
Basically, a long string of characters with imbedded codes that turn features on or off, or change settings along the way, rather than style sheets.
― Everything else is secondary (Lee626), Thursday, 20 October 2011 20:26 (fourteen years ago)
embedded
― Everything else is secondary (Lee626), Thursday, 20 October 2011 20:27 (fourteen years ago)
I've really been digging the new feature on Acrobat X that allows saving pdfs as word docs. It was buggy in the past, but seems to work pretty well now (with the exception of opacities, translucent polygons, etc). I'm constantly being asked to reproduce design files as word docs, and now I can pretty much convert them with one click.
― Darin, Thursday, 20 October 2011 20:51 (fourteen years ago)
Oh man, I so want Acrobat X. I do a ton of work w/ PDF documents and our office is still on 8 (pro).
8 allows you to save a PDF as a Word, but IIRC, it saves the text in text boxes, which is really annoying. Or if it's an image only (not OCR), it saves it as an image embedded in a Word doc.
― Je55e, Friday, 21 October 2011 18:36 (fourteen years ago)
wow. i have not used this thing for 15 years. it's awful!
but i have to use it now.
i want to get rid of basically all the chrome. i'm nearly there. there are still buttons at the bottom of the window to change the view (outline, page, print, etc.) and zoom. how do i get rid of this bottom toolbar?
http://i.minus.com/ibd3DUYpam3tkN.png
― caek, Thursday, 22 August 2013 18:34 (twelve years ago)
a little bit of black tape should work
― 乒乓, Thursday, 22 August 2013 18:38 (twelve years ago)
thanks man
― caek, Thursday, 22 August 2013 18:41 (twelve years ago)
why on earth do you have to use it
― Euler, Thursday, 22 August 2013 19:22 (twelve years ago)
fuckin track changes maybe I guess fuck that fucking forever though
― Euler, Thursday, 22 August 2013 19:23 (twelve years ago)
i am teaching collaboratively with biologists, neuroscientists, etc.
― caek, Thursday, 22 August 2013 19:24 (twelve years ago)
they should know better than, wtf
― Euler, Thursday, 22 August 2013 19:24 (twelve years ago)
lol nope
― caek, Thursday, 22 August 2013 19:26 (twelve years ago)
when I am asked to referee an article written in Word I sigh a sigh for the cosmos, so ugly, even without notation
― Euler, Thursday, 22 August 2013 19:26 (twelve years ago)
saudade of typewriters at that moment tbh
― Euler, Thursday, 22 August 2013 19:27 (twelve years ago)
yeah, it's not just the UI for writers, which is obviously garbage. it's what actually results. the defaults are toxic and the rendering/layout engine results in just plain ugly paragraphs and pages. the amount of work required to make something not look like total ass is enormous, whereas the amount of work required to make something look worse is tiny.
― caek, Thursday, 22 August 2013 19:30 (twelve years ago)
it's like it was built for dot matrix printing
― Euler, Thursday, 22 August 2013 19:31 (twelve years ago)
so otm xp
― stet, Thursday, 22 August 2013 20:23 (twelve years ago)
i had to put in a lot of time with word over the summer - i developed a grudging respect for it
― 乒乓, Thursday, 22 August 2013 20:39 (twelve years ago)
Word on Mac is an atrocity.
Maybe b/c I don't know any different, I don't have a problem w/ Word on Windows. Do everyday, non-specialist people commonly use something else?
― potatoes-in-law (Je55e), Thursday, 22 August 2013 20:43 (twelve years ago)
I really liked (PC) Word 97 up to 2005, because I pretty much mastered it.
Word 2007 (PC) and its ribbon fucked things up. Not being able to completely customise toolbars (and have them float anywhere on screen!) made it much more awkward to use.
At work I have to use Word on a Mac (think it's the 2011 version). It's crazy. Like some piece of freeware that sort of works but whose features haven't been thought through at all. Six clicks to do things that should take one click. Amazing bugs (google "mac word 2011 paste freeze" - oh yeah, you can't even copy and paste in 2011!). Literally hundreds of basic problems with this shitty program.
― Eyeball Kicks, Thursday, 22 August 2013 20:44 (twelve years ago)
so what do mac people use that's good? agree that word 2011 sucks. i bought office for $10 when i got my macbook last year because i don't know any better. i hate outlook soooo much.
― maven maven (Matt P), Thursday, 22 August 2013 20:52 (twelve years ago)
I am a latex priss so ignore me maybe but for most shit people use word for, wouldn't just like the free notepad or, on mac, textedit, be enough?
― Euler, Thursday, 22 August 2013 21:18 (twelve years ago)
textedit is totally fine. notational velocity if youre not writing anything super long and want nice syncing/file mgmt options
― max, Thursday, 22 August 2013 21:53 (twelve years ago)
bean if youre attached to having "a word processor"
― max, Thursday, 22 August 2013 21:54 (twelve years ago)
ty
― maven maven (Matt P), Thursday, 22 August 2013 22:13 (twelve years ago)
yeah I use notational velocity full time too, no formatting but if we're comparing with word
― Euler, Thursday, 22 August 2013 22:55 (twelve years ago)
I use Pages or Nisus
― stet, Thursday, 22 August 2013 23:07 (twelve years ago)
NV allows basic formatting right? i like it because any formatting it wont let you do is probably formatting you dont need
― max, Thursday, 22 August 2013 23:25 (twelve years ago)
Help me ILX! A coworker sent me our org chart in a big docx file and I have to remove an arrow entry. How the fuck do I edit this monstrosity??? I’m using Word 2016. How am I supposed to tell whether this is a Word template thing that I can edit in Word, or is it just a huge image pasted onto a word document?
― Mr. Snrub, Saturday, 1 June 2019 15:52 (six years ago)
If it is an image you should be able to delete it in one stroke with the delete key.
― visiting, Saturday, 1 June 2019 15:57 (six years ago)
(not that you want to delete it but that will tell you if it is an image)
― visiting, Saturday, 1 June 2019 15:59 (six years ago)
Aha! I see “Drawing Tools” and I can edit the arrows and boxes and employee names and such, so it is a Word thing. Now how to change the number of arrows in a particular entry?
― Mr. Snrub, Saturday, 1 June 2019 16:12 (six years ago)
Interesting read on the end of Nisus Software and what happens when your business is no longer viable but you still believe you can extract further income from your product, no matter how it affects your users.https://tidbits.com/2025/10/25/nisus-writer-schrodingers-word-processor/
― Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 25 October 2025 23:34 (three months ago)