My BP nom list:
BabelUnited 93The DepartedDreamgirlsFlags of Our Fathers
Could also be World Trade Center, Letters from Iwo Jima, Little Miss Sunshine, Bobby, and I have a weird feeling Children of Men could end up in the running if it has box office legs, though jaymc and morbs have expressed scepticism.
PS I have seen none of these films, but doing so is never a requirement to play this game.
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:02 (nineteen years ago)
Bobby won't get anywhere near the Best Pic nominees. You'd think that the Golden Globe and SAG Ensemble nods would be indicators, but it's also the kind of star-studded movie that the Globes go crazy for (look, it's Lindsay Lohan! and there's Sharon Stone! etc.), and SAG Ensemble nominations are often given to movies that simply have a large ensemble. But overall reception wasn't particularly great, and an Oscar film it ain't.
World Trade Center doesn't seem likely. I'm not sure it ever really caught on, and it's hard to imagine Academy voters going with two 9/11 films. (That said, I'm beginning to have doubts about United 93. Seems a little too criticky.)
You're also forgetting a major contender: The Queen
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:13 (nineteen years ago)
Bobby gets the aging lefty nostalgics, with a musty stench of import hanging over it. Keep in mind these are people who writ Crash into the history books.
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:16 (nineteen years ago)
(if one of the Clints squeezes in, it will be the Japanese one)
DiCaprio (Departed)Gosling (the only iffy one)O'TooleWill SmithWhitaker
CruzDenchMirrenStreepWinslet
CondonEastwood FrearsInnarituScorsese
(subject to change once DGA noms come out)
and the rest, as Bill Murray usta say, who cares.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:17 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:19 (nineteen years ago)
will Gore take best doc? i really hope jesus camp gets a nom.
― mahalo 4 ur kokua (grady), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:20 (nineteen years ago)
Gore seems an early lock for best doc, but that category has been known to zag when a zig is expected.
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:23 (nineteen years ago)
(All the nominated pictures' directors are chosen, with the exception of Eastwood replacing Dayton/Faris -- which looks like the list that Morbius is predicting as well.)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:24 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:30 (nineteen years ago)
xp
Is Babel worth seeing at all?
― mahalo 4 ur kokua (grady), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:31 (nineteen years ago)
Eddie MurphyJack NicholsonMichael SheenAlan ArkinJackie Earle Haley
Supporting Actress:
Jennifer HudsonCate BlanchettAdriana BarazzaRinko KikuchiAbigail Breslin
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:35 (nineteen years ago)
Yeah, I don't see them nominating Cohen and Ken Watanabe may be the only other lead on the radar. This is a good scoreboard site:
http://www.oscarwatch.com
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:37 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:45 (nineteen years ago)
Yeah, I was thinking of it as the Full Monty slot.
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:47 (nineteen years ago)
what about Babel's role as the "globo-Crash"? i forget who I stole that from.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:52 (nineteen years ago)
What are the chances of Pan's Labyrinth breaking out of the foreign pic ghetto?
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:54 (nineteen years ago)
About $60 million, but lots of great word-of-mouth, surprise hit, etc.
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 January 2007 17:58 (nineteen years ago)
Heh.
At first I thought you meant you saw Little Miss Sunshine, and I was reading "strippers" as "beauty-pageant contestants." Eek.
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:01 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:08 (nineteen years ago)
The Death of Mr LazarescuL'EnfantPan's Labyrinth VolverZwartboek
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:23 (nineteen years ago)
― ‘•’u (gear), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:27 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:28 (nineteen years ago)
Apoctalypto is ineligible for FL nom, correct?
(on technical grounds, not because the Jews are responsible for all wars)
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:28 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:31 (nineteen years ago)
Much harder if Nicholson does for same film.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:35 (nineteen years ago)
― ‘•’u (gear), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:44 (nineteen years ago)
― ‘•’u (gear), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:45 (nineteen years ago)
walhberg deserves it way more.
― s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:49 (nineteen years ago)
― ‘•’u (gear), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:50 (nineteen years ago)
Like a great punk album! Wahlberg wins!
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:57 (nineteen years ago)
― stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Friday, 5 January 2007 18:58 (nineteen years ago)
Nope, that's what was so fun about it.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 5 January 2007 19:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 5 January 2007 19:09 (nineteen years ago)
x-post
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 5 January 2007 19:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 5 January 2007 19:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Fleischhutliebe! like a warm, furry meatloaf (Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows), Friday, 5 January 2007 19:11 (nineteen years ago)
(non-eligble anyway)
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 5 January 2007 19:13 (nineteen years ago)
Not if you're hanging out with the other celibates at the campus humor magazine.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 January 2007 19:33 (nineteen years ago)
― i've dreamt of rubies! (Mandee), Friday, 5 January 2007 20:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 January 2007 20:08 (nineteen years ago)
I hope Prince takes it all.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 5 January 2007 20:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 5 January 2007 21:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 January 2007 21:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 5 January 2007 21:55 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 January 2007 21:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 5 January 2007 21:56 (nineteen years ago)
― ‘•’u (gear), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:01 (nineteen years ago)
― The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:02 (nineteen years ago)
― stoked for the madness (nickalicious), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:03 (nineteen years ago)
xpost
― chap (chap), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:07 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:15 (nineteen years ago)
Manhattan
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:16 (nineteen years ago)
I'm going to go out on a limb and say Pan's Labyrinth for the token foreign film in the Best Original Screenplay list
I think it is extremely likely two guys from The Departed will be pitted against each other in the Supporting Actor Category.
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:17 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:19 (nineteen years ago)
Hmm. Death Becomes Her? She-Devil?
― Je4nn3 Fuhfuh (Je4nne Fury), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:19 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:24 (nineteen years ago)
― chap (chap), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:27 (nineteen years ago)
Silkwood is very good, but "great" -- I think even Manhattan needs the quotes.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:33 (nineteen years ago)
It's called oscars.com.
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:33 (nineteen years ago)
Foreign submissions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submissions_for_the_79th_Academy_Award_for_Best_Foreign_Film
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:34 (nineteen years ago)
thanks morbs
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 5 January 2007 22:35 (nineteen years ago)
Best Picture: Pan's LabyrinthDirector: Paul GreengrassActor: Forest WhitakerActress: Helen MirrenSupp Actor: Mark WahlbergSupp Actress: Meryl Streep (for both A Prairie Home Companion and Prada)
Whitaker beat Peter O'Toole by a single vote; The Death of Mr. Lazarescu lost by a single vote.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 January 2007 14:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Seven Years as a Bird in the Wood (The GZeus), Monday, 8 January 2007 14:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 8 January 2007 14:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 8 January 2007 14:40 (nineteen years ago)
So I'll recalibrate my foreign lang noms to the wiki entry on what's been submitted, pick any 5 of these:
WaterCurse of the Golden FlowerThe Lives of OthersDreamsPan's LabyrinthVolverBlack Book
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 8 January 2007 14:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:10 (nineteen years ago)
Any bets on whether this will be "the year" for Scorsese to win Best Director? I expect he and Lynch will get a nod.
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:19 (nineteen years ago)
We won't, but the Academy will.
You can bet Lynch won't get a nod. The Academy likes him, but they don't like Oscar-courting strategies involving cows.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:19 (nineteen years ago)
If IMDB's to be believed, Almodovar's Oscar track record is one nom and one win?
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:25 (nineteen years ago)
My favorite De Niro appearance of the past few years was his SNL host, where he made no bones of staring straight at the teleprompter and reading his lines with minimum exertion. Fuck you, I'm De Niro!
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:30 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:31 (nineteen years ago)
ehhh...del Toro's pretty firmly entrenched as a genre filmmaker (kiss of death), even if Pan's Labyrinth is being taken seriously, it will only be recognized in the form of noms and a win for visual effects/costumes/set design.
Best Picture = popular favorite (Dreamgirls)Best Director = great movie w/ great direction (WILL IT BE THE YEAR OF MARTY???)Best Original/Adapted Screenplay = great movie w/ great script (dunno about original, but adapted will almost certainly be Little Children)
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:35 (nineteen years ago)
(it is true that megagrossers win more often than they used to -- Titanic, Lord of The Kachings 3 -- but not usually; Dead Man's Chest is not in the running)
Isn't the dame sposed to be a Killing of Sister George-type retro-lez?
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:37 (nineteen years ago)
She even eschews makeup.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:37 (nineteen years ago)
something has to explain Gladiator/Chicago/etc. I meant "popular favorite" as in made money AND got favorable reviews.
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:38 (nineteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:40 (nineteen years ago)
Tuesday, January 23, 2007: Nominations announced 5:30 a.m. PST, Samuel Goldwyn Theater
Wednesday, January 31, 2007: Final ballots mailed.
Tuesday, February 20, 2007: Final polls close 5 p.m. PST.
Sunday, February 25, 2007: 79th Annual Academy Awards Presentation
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:46 (nineteen years ago)
2004 (77th) The Aviator Finding Neverland * Million Dollar Baby Ray Sideways
2005 (78th) BEST PICTURE Brokeback Mountain Capote * Crash Good Night, and Good Luck Munich
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:56 (nineteen years ago)
Crash won because it had the OPRAH VOTE.
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 8 January 2007 15:59 (nineteen years ago)
― The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Monday, 8 January 2007 16:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 8 January 2007 16:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 January 2007 16:03 (nineteen years ago)
― The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Monday, 8 January 2007 16:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Monday, 8 January 2007 16:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 8 January 2007 16:52 (nineteen years ago)
― The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Monday, 8 January 2007 18:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 8 January 2007 18:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 8 January 2007 18:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 8 January 2007 18:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 8 January 2007 18:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 8 January 2007 18:52 (nineteen years ago)
I'm trying to think of the last comedic actor who won an Oscar for a 'straight' role -- Red Buttons?
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 18:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 18:13 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 18:18 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 18:38 (nineteen years ago)
If Pan's Labrynth is set in Spain, and Guillermo Del Toro is Mexican, does that make it ineligable for Best Foreign Language Film?
― The Ultimate Conclusion (lokar), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 19:43 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 19:47 (nineteen years ago)
Some interesting outcomes at the Globes: Eastwood beating Almodovar for Iwo Jima, Cars besting Happy Feet, not sure what that bodes in Oscarland.
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 20:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 20:20 (nineteen years ago)
(how soon they forget)
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 20:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 20:24 (nineteen years ago)
Eric & Ed forecast at Slant:
http://www.slantmagazine.com/blog/default.asp?Display=85
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 20:56 (nineteen years ago)
― latebloomer aka freedom williams sr (latebloomer), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 20:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 21:39 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 21:41 (nineteen years ago)
Alan ArkinMichael SheenBrad PittDjimon HounsouEddie MurphyJackie Earle HaleyJack NicholsonMark Wahlberg
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 21:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 21:49 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 21:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 22:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:49 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:51 (nineteen years ago)
I'm expecting a curveball in the BP noms. Oscar noms are not based on straight majority vote, and there's a bit of play in the field once you look past the fer-sures.
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 22 January 2007 17:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:03 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:04 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:07 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:20 (nineteen years ago)
If IE gets nominated for anything, I will post a photo of myself here with clothespins on my nipples.
While watching the SOTU please!
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:26 (nineteen years ago)
I bumped the detrius thread with that one. I would bump it again for the Razzie nominations, but the days of good bad movies (Mommie Dearest, Showgirls) getting nominated for those things is long gone.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:27 (nineteen years ago)
When he stepped up to the podium at the Globes to receive his award, I turned to my wife and said, "How can you not love Forest Whitaker?" It'll be great if he gets it, although as one of the usual suspects pointed out above, his lock might be challenged if O'Toole gets a nom.
Unsung Whitaker perfs: The Color of Money, Diary of a Hit Man
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:44 (nineteen years ago)
(still haven't seen Training Day here and I'm fine with that)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:45 (nineteen years ago)
― i've dreamt of rubies! (Mandee), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:47 (nineteen years ago)
Morgan Freeman.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:52 (nineteen years ago)
To date I have not had the stomach to test the veracity of this claim.
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:55 (nineteen years ago)
― ‘•’u (gear), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:59 (nineteen years ago)
I know winning about 700 critics' awards doesn't necessarily make someone a frontrunner for the Globe/Oscar, but I think it at least partially precludes some bewilderment.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:59 (nineteen years ago)
you forgot: loads of boobies
― i've dreamt of rubies! (Mandee), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:00 (nineteen years ago)
Which is exactly why he deserves all those acting awards! He faked it!
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:06 (nineteen years ago)
so you're also saying I should be happy that Scorsese is gonna win for maybe his 18th-best film?
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:10 (nineteen years ago)
who's seen him in this dreamgirls thing? what's he like in it?
― pisces (piscesx), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:11 (nineteen years ago)
you mean the SECOND, laaaady
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:26 (nineteen years ago)
Here is more helpful info from IMDB:
Tagline: Men cannot resist her. Mankind may not survive her.
Plot Outline: A message from outer space contains instructions on how to modify human DNA.
User Comments: Jugs!
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:31 (nineteen years ago)
I don't have time for a ranking, but I think it's better than his last three, Cape Fear, Boxcar Bertha, maybe After Hours, and that's about it.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:44 (nineteen years ago)
mean streetstaxi drivergoodfellasthe departedage of innocencecasinolast temptationraging bullbringing out the deadafter hoursaviatorkundungangs of nyny, nycolor of money
either i haven't seen the rest or it's been so long i can't remember them. i think the only one of those i hated was color of money, the only thing i liked were some okay pool shots.
― ‘•’u (gear), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:48 (nineteen years ago)
and Italianamerican.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:49 (nineteen years ago)
― ‘•’u (gear), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 January 2007 19:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 January 2007 20:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 20:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 22 January 2007 20:09 (nineteen years ago)
didn't we have a more general Oscar thread for this year?
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 January 2007 20:16 (nineteen years ago)
xpost-to-Morbius - This was it until we started talking about Scorsese. Fucking film geeks.
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 20:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 January 2007 20:27 (nineteen years ago)
― franny (frannyglass), Monday, 22 January 2007 20:50 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 22 January 2007 20:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 January 2007 21:03 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Monday, 22 January 2007 21:10 (nineteen years ago)
Robert Downey Jr., Chaplin (1992, 9.5m)Peter Fonda, Ulee's Gold (1997, 9.1m)Ed Harris, Pollock (2000, 8.6m)Geoffrey Rush, Quills (2000, 7.1m)Edward Norton, American History X (1998, 6.7m)Ian McKellen, Gods and Monsters (1998, 6.4m)Nick Nolte, Affliction (1998, 6.3m)Richard Farnsworth, The Straight Story (1999, 6.2m)Sean Penn, Sweet and Lowdown (1999, 4.2m)Javier Bardem, Before Night Falls (2000, 4.2m)Richard Harris, The Field (1990, 1.4m)
Robert Downey Jr. and Edward Norton were both under 30 at the time of their nomination.
Chaplin made under $10 million because it was a high-profile bomb. American History X (whose cult status came from video, apparently) is a good analogue to Gosling in Half Nelson, though -- and for more reasons than one. In both, you've got a young gifted actor playing a troubled character who's trying to reform, partially through mentoring someone close to him.
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 22 January 2007 21:39 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 22 January 2007 21:40 (nineteen years ago)
A Gosling nom would be a bit more out of left field.
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 21:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 22 January 2007 21:50 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 22 January 2007 21:52 (nineteen years ago)
― ‘•’u (gear), Monday, 22 January 2007 21:53 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 22 January 2007 21:56 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 22 January 2007 22:01 (nineteen years ago)
Tony Kaye has got a much talked-about, lengthy documentary about abortion politics coming up.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 January 2007 22:03 (nineteen years ago)
― m@p (plosive), Monday, 22 January 2007 22:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 22 January 2007 22:19 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 22 January 2007 22:21 (nineteen years ago)
No wai! That means he's in my league, age-wise.
I can think of only two Scorsese films I've seen that I prefer to The Departed: Taxi Driver and Last Temptation. I do, however, have to watch his Jerry Lewis one still.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 05:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 06:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 13:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 13:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:06 (nineteen years ago)
BabelThe DepartedLetters From Iwo JimaLittle Miss SunshineThe Queen
Will post more once the Academy figures out how to push changes to a website.
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:09 (nineteen years ago)
Performance by an actor in a supporting roleAlan Arkin - LITTLE MISS SUNSHINEJackie Earle Haley - LITTLE CHILDRENDjimon Hounsou - BLOOD DIAMOND Eddie Murphy - DREAMGIRLS Mark Wahlberg - THE DEPARTED
Performance by an actress in a leading rolePenélope Cruz - VOLVER Judi Dench - NOTES ON A SCANDALHelen Mirren - THE QUEEN Meryl Streep - THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA Kate Winslet - LITTLE CHILDREN
Performance by an actress in a supporting roleAdriana Barraza - BABEL Cate Blanchett - NOTES ON A SCANDALAbigail Breslin - LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE Jennifer Hudson - DREAMGIRLS Rinko Kikuchi - BABEL
Best animated feature film of the yearCARSHAPPY FEET MONSTER HOUSE
Achievement in art directionDREAMGIRLS THE GOOD SHEPHERDPAN'S LABYRINTHPIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: DEAD MAN'S CHESTTHE PRESTIGE
Achievement in cinematographyTHE BLACK DAHLIA CHILDREN OF MEN THE ILLUSIONIST PAN'S LABYRINTH THE PRESTIGE
Achievement in costume designCURSE OF THE GOLDEN FLOWER THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA DREAMGIRLS MARIE ANTOINETTE THE QUEEN
Achievement in directingBABEL THE DEPARTED LETTERS FROM IWO JIMA THE QUEEN UNITED 93
Best documentary featureDELIVER US FROM EVIL AN INCONVENIENT TRUTHIRAQ IN FRAGMENTS JESUS CAMPMY COUNTRY, MY COUNTRY
Best documentary short subjectTHE BLOOD OF YINGZHOU DISTRICTRECYCLED LIFEREHEARSING A DREAMTWO HANDS
Achievement in film editingBABEL BLOOD DIAMOND CHILDREN OF MEN THE DEPARTED UNITED 93
Best foreign language film of the yearAFTER THE WEDDING DAYS OF GLORY (INDIGÈNES)THE LIVES OF OTHERS PAN'S LABYRINTH WATER
Achievement in makeupAPOCALYPTO CLICK PAN'S LABYRINTH
Achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original score)BABEL THE GOOD GERMAN NOTES ON A SCANDAL PAN'S LABYRINTH THE QUEEN
Achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original song)"I Need to Wake Up" - AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH"Listen" - DREAMGIRLS"Love You I Do" - DREAMGIRLS"Our Town" - CARS"Patience" - DREAMGIRLS
Best motion picture of the yearBABEL THE DEPARTED LETTERS FROM IWO JIMA LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE THE QUEEN
Adapted screenplayBORAT CULTURAL LEARNINGS OF AMERICA FOR MAKE BENEFIT GLORIOUS NATION OF KAZAKHSTAN CHILDREN OF MEN THE DEPARTED LITTLE CHILDREN NOTES ON A SCANDAL
Original screenplayBABEL LETTERS FROM IWO JIMA LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE PAN'S LABYRINTH THE QUEEN
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:14 (nineteen years ago)
The Last Waltz and Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore also pwn The Departed.
Good for Vilmos Zsigmond (most BdP films improve with the sound off anyway).
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:20 (nineteen years ago)
so 6 for Pan's -- is that 4 for COM?
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:24 (nineteen years ago)
unless like saturday night fever had a bunch or same.
― pisces (piscesx), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:24 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:25 (nineteen years ago)
(x-post) Beauty and the Beast
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:26 (nineteen years ago)
― blotter Budweiser Hackeysadk (nickalicious), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:27 (nineteen years ago)
― blotter Budweiser Hackeysadk (nickalicious), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:31 (nineteen years ago)
Man, the Academy has just assured us of millions of unwitting "girl-and-her-adventures" attendees at Pan's cowering in their seats, so that's the bright side.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:32 (nineteen years ago)
Best actorRyan Gosling - HALF NELSONWill Smith - THE PURSUIT OF HAPPYNESS
Best supporting actorMark Wahlberg - THE DEPARTED (happy, Alfred?)
No Brad Pitt!
Best supporting actressAdriana Barraza - BABEL (don't think anybody saw this one coming)
Best foreign language filmNo Volver!
Achievement in makeupCLICK (WTF)
Pan's Labyrinth made out surprisingly well, with 6 noms.
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:34 (nineteen years ago)
for the win...
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:36 (nineteen years ago)
Smug Al Gore fans are relieved that the Ralph Nader documentary was left off the ballot.
Edward III, if those were acting surprises you aren't nearly the Oscar queen jaymc is.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:37 (nineteen years ago)
All the Oscar forecasters I saw had it, along with the other Supp Actress.
Eric, COM got Lubezki, editing, script.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:40 (nineteen years ago)
That's what I meant. So the cinematography, editing and writers' branches all agreed it was one of the year's best films. Why have the directors been so blind in the last few years? It wasn't so long ago they nominated both David Lynch and Robert Altman in the same year.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:43 (nineteen years ago)
― blotter Budweiser Hackeysadk (nickalicious), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:44 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.oscars.com/nominees/?pn=films
*sob*
Actually, the supporting actor surprise is Wahlberg's there and Nicholson isn't? Gosling was kind of a dark horse, and Will Smith was more like wishful thinking.
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:45 (nineteen years ago)
I'm happy that My Country, My Country made the doc feature list -- it's not as pretty as Iraq in Fragments, but has more to say.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:45 (nineteen years ago)
― blotter Budweiser Hackeysadk (nickalicious), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:46 (nineteen years ago)
No, actually that's not a surprise at all.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:46 (nineteen years ago)
Ooh. Going against the grain, and just when that film is set to open in Mpls in a few weeks. Nicely played.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:47 (nineteen years ago)
― blotter Budweiser Hackeysadk (nickalicious), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:51 (nineteen years ago)
That would allow an entire season of South park to write itself.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:59 (nineteen years ago)
― The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:03 (nineteen years ago)
My Country, My Country has been on PBS already.
You can tell Dreamgirls is a Broadway klassik cuz they had to write 3 new songs for it.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:03 (nineteen years ago)
― The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:04 (nineteen years ago)
Also, I just realized that the both smug and toothless satire of Thank You For Smoking was snubbed for screenplay. Good snub, that one.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:05 (nineteen years ago)
Still wanna hear the Academy doubletalk on Iwo Jima's "originality."
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:13 (nineteen years ago)
― The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:14 (nineteen years ago)
(But I do have a bootlegging brother who's provided me with copies of things like Balboa, Pursuit of Happyness and other crap at home waiting to be viewed.)
― Ms Misery (MissMiseryTX), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:16 (nineteen years ago)
I really really really really want to see "Little Miss Sunshine", "Babel" and "The Departed". The other two... not so much, largely because I'm not drawn to the subject matter. (Also they aren't straight fiction and that's what I prefer in pretty much every aspect of my entertainment. When I want facts fitlered through various biases, I go to various news sources, not the movies.)
― The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:18 (nineteen years ago)
Oh, I'm not paying to see any of those other 3 BP nominees now, esp as how overrated (if good) I found Iwo and Departed.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:22 (nineteen years ago)
I know there are de Palma fetishists - I've come to accept this phenomenon exists - but I really think 'The Black Dahlia' is one of the worst photographed movies of Vilmos Zsigmond's career (excepting maybe 'Melinda and Melinda' and 'Jersey Girl'). The whole movie was a massacre, but the photography in particular sucked every ounce of mystery, atmosphere, intrigue, and emotion out of that story.
― Tiki Theater Xymposium (Bent Over at the Arclight), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:26 (nineteen years ago)
Oscar logic dictates that an actor never ever wins for their best performance, much much more so than any director. Whittaker would have a LOCK on Actor apart from a) O'Toole and b) someone else is going to win an Oscar for playing a C20 ruler this year; they don't usually hand out both awards to actors playing IRLs.
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:35 (nineteen years ago)
― g00blar (gooblar), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:37 (nineteen years ago)
― The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:38 (nineteen years ago)
LOL. I was just about to say, all of the acting categories except for supporting actor have been pretty much locked for the last several weeks. Barraza was nominated for a Golden Globe, even.
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:38 (nineteen years ago)
And, yes, Mark Wahlberg can flip the bird at Jack Nicholson (who'll still get the best seat in the house).
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:40 (nineteen years ago)
O'Toole winning for this would be almost as bad as Pacino winning for Shouting Blind Man.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Tiki Theater Xymposium (Bent Over at the Arclight), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:52 (nineteen years ago)
Also in 'Stay'.
― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 15:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:02 (nineteen years ago)
― g00blar (gooblar), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:03 (nineteen years ago)
Well, it all depends on who you ask.../twelvefootlizard
Morbius, I said I was unbelievably biased towards O'Toole because he is my favourite actor EVER and I would probably be happy with him even if he were in some experimental piece of crap where he read the phone book and cussed every now and again. Actually, that would make me VERY HAPPY. I haven't seen Venus yet because it opens here Friday. All I know is he cops a few feels off a teenager, swears a lot, might even say CUNT because the script is by Kureishi, and keels over. Can't be bad.
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:05 (nineteen years ago)
haha, from a gaygay board:
I loved Selma Hayek's "Yes" when Penelope Cruz' nomination was announced - although it will also fan the sapphic rumors surrounding the two.
This gets even me hot.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:07 (nineteen years ago)
Except it happened last year, when Philip Seymour Hoffman won for playing Truman Capote and Reese Witherspoon won for playing June Carter Cash. (Also 2002: Nicole Kidman/Virginia Woolf and Adrien Brody/W³adys³aw Szpilman.)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:10 (nineteen years ago)
When we got off at the lobby level, I said, "Don't you ever say criticize me in front of Peter O'Toole again!"
"Wait, that was Peter O'Toole?"
"Didn't you smell the liquor, dude?"
― M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:13 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:13 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:19 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:23 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:30 (nineteen years ago)
No Casino Royale at all!
― DavidM* (unreal), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:33 (nineteen years ago)
1964: Rex Harrison for My Fair Lady and Julie Andrews for Mary Poppins.
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:35 (nineteen years ago)
Also I think I mentioned this upthread, but Bacall/Binoche in '96.
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:36 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:37 (nineteen years ago)
― blotter Budweiser Hackeysadk (nickalicious), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:38 (nineteen years ago)
I wondered too, but read recently that no, ASD is officially kosher as animation.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:42 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:45 (nineteen years ago)
― blotter Budweiser Hackeysadk (nickalicious), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:46 (nineteen years ago)
Two Brits? Pfft. Peter O'Toole has never, ever given the definitive answer to whether he was born in Ireland or Leeds - and his mum was Scottish. I suspect Leeds and *not* Irish west cost masel but he did go through a phase of saying his first name was originally Seamus and that he was Irish-born. However none of the Irish stuff is borne out by the book he wrote. Guardian are calling him Irish today and therefore not including him in their (erk) Brit Parade.
I met O'Toole when I was in college because he was coming out of rehearsals as we were coming out of picking up our tix to the play he was in. A few years ago Nick and I were in some random part of Holborn and Nick spotted him crossing the street, but he was so frailish that we argued as to whether or not it was actually Karl Lagerfeld. However KL doesn't wear a) green socks or b) claddagh ring so we were able to make a positive ID.
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:47 (nineteen years ago)
LIKE pornography, animation has always been easy to recognize and hard to define. But the definitional problems have grown more perplexing lately. Even professionals in the field are finding it difficult to decide: is a computer-generated penguin whose dance moves come from digital mimicry of a human truly animated?“Maybe ‘animation’ is becoming a redundant term,” Nick Park, whose four Oscars include one last year for co-directing “Wallace & Gromit in the Curse of the Were-Rabbit,” said in a telephone interview from his studio in Bristol, England. “They used to define it as anything that wasn’t live action, but now the two are kind of merging. It can be difficult to tell what’s animation, but the only time that really becomes a problem is when you have to figure out which category to enter for awards.”This last is no small issue: many of the films eligible for the best animated feature Oscar represent either a combination of media or a technique that pushes the traditional boundaries of animation. The rules of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, which awards the Oscars, say that an animated feature film should be created with a frame-by-frame technique, have a running time of at least 70 minutes, display a “significant number” of major animated characters and employ animation in not less than 75 percent of its running time. But where the medium begins and ends in an era of nonstop technical change remains a topic of often heated debate.Some prominent artists are cautious about trying to draw lines around their world, even if that leaves room for argument over motion capture technology (which synced the live dancer and the penguin in “Happy Feet”) or the processed live action behind the images in “A Scanner Darkly.” (Both films qualify for award consideration under current rules.)“I think we have to expand the boundaries of definition, but I’m not sure what it should be at this point,” said John Canemaker, the Oscar-winning animated filmmaker and New York University professor. “I think we have to decide what is and isn’t animation on a case-by-case basis, rather than being doctrinaire about it.”In the past animation was usually distinguished from live action by two factors: each frame of film was exposed individually, rather than as part of a longer take; and the illusion of movement was created, rather than recorded. But many recent films exceed those parameters.Motion capture, or mo-cap, for instance, blurs the line by using computers to record the movements of an actor, which can then be reproduced by characters on the screen. (Motion capture was also used to create the kids in “Monster House” and the starkly lighted humans in the French feature “Renaissance.”)Some animators object to mo-cap, arguing that it leaves no place for their creative input. Others counter that the captured data almost invariably has to be massaged, which means animators adjust the movements, sometimes minimally, sometimes more so. A third camp compares the process to the rotoscope, an early-20th-century device that enables animators to trace live-action footage frame by frame. Walt Disney’s artists used the rotoscope for some scenes of the heroine in “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” (1937). Ralph Bakshi used it extensively in “American Pop” (1981).“How do we deal with the modern-day equivalent of the rotoscope?” Mr. Canemaker asked. “For that matter, how do we deal with the old version of the rotoscope? ‘Snow White’ is considered animation because of the way they altered the image; the input of the artist was so distinct. There has to be a strong input from the hand of the artist — or, today, the mouse of the artist.”In a telephone interview from the Pixar Animation Studios in Emeryville, Calif., John Lasseter, the Oscar-winning director of “Cars” and the “Toy Story” films, argued that some element of deliberate distortion will always be of the essence in animation.“Since animation began, there’s always been a desire to replace the animator and devise a technical way of getting movement,” Mr. Lasseter said. But, he added: “The results always look odd, because in animation you’re creating a caricatured world. Although today’s computer-animated films may be getting closer to reality, they’re still caricatured. To make those worlds believable, the motions need to be caricatured to the same degree as the visuals. When you put realistic motion from live action into a caricatured world, it doesn’t fit.”Although processed live action hasn’t appeared in mainstream animated films, Richard Linklater used it for “Waking Life” and “A Scanner Darkly.” Under this technique, the film is shot in live action, and the imagery is altered with computer paint programs.Mr. Lasseter is among those who feel that works of this kind should be considered animation. “It still technically qualifies, as you are manipulating the frames that the audience sees on the screen,” he said. “It’s not a technique you can apply to the live-footage action automatically. It actually has to be manipulated by an artist frame by frame.”Mr. Canemaker said, “I was intrigued by the look of ‘Waking Life,’ but I felt the film would have fared better if a director of animation had been involved. I didn’t think the sections were as different from one another as they were touted to be. I’m not that fond of literalism in any form of animation: I think the interpretation of the artist is the important thing, and how the hand and mind are seen in the product.”“Renaissance” and “Scanner Darkly” are art house films aimed at viewers interested in experimental techniques. But an increasing number of big-budget, mainstream movies feature computer-animated characters, from Stuart Little and Garfield to Gollum and King Kong. This fusion of techniques further blurs the distinction between live action and animation.Should “Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties,” which places a computer-animated cat in a live-action world, be considered an animated film? Should “Star Wars: Episode III — Revenge of the Sith,” since it is populated with animated robots, vehicles and creatures? Mr. Lasseter said the distinction lies in the filmmaker’s intent. “For me the fundamental question is: Do you want the audience to know this world does not exist, or do you want to make it look like the real world and just expand what you can do in live action?” he said.“Since I started working with computer animation in 1981, the goal in the computer graphics research world has been to create tools that can reproduce reality,” Mr. Lasseter continued. “I use many of these tools, but I use them to create something the audience knows doesn’t exist, then mess with their minds by making it look real and believable. I think visualizing a believable world that is very fanciful may be harder than taking a photograph and trying to reproduce it.”Mr. Park summed up what may represent the consensus among animation artists when he said, “I’m anti making things more realistic. Everything in me goes against it.”His view: “If you aim for realism, and you don’t quite achieve it, it can become very ugly. If you separate your work from reality, the artistry and stylization become the focus. For me that’s the joy of filmmaking. I don’t want to create reality. I’m not interested in reality.”
“Maybe ‘animation’ is becoming a redundant term,” Nick Park, whose four Oscars include one last year for co-directing “Wallace & Gromit in the Curse of the Were-Rabbit,” said in a telephone interview from his studio in Bristol, England. “They used to define it as anything that wasn’t live action, but now the two are kind of merging. It can be difficult to tell what’s animation, but the only time that really becomes a problem is when you have to figure out which category to enter for awards.”
This last is no small issue: many of the films eligible for the best animated feature Oscar represent either a combination of media or a technique that pushes the traditional boundaries of animation. The rules of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, which awards the Oscars, say that an animated feature film should be created with a frame-by-frame technique, have a running time of at least 70 minutes, display a “significant number” of major animated characters and employ animation in not less than 75 percent of its running time. But where the medium begins and ends in an era of nonstop technical change remains a topic of often heated debate.
Some prominent artists are cautious about trying to draw lines around their world, even if that leaves room for argument over motion capture technology (which synced the live dancer and the penguin in “Happy Feet”) or the processed live action behind the images in “A Scanner Darkly.” (Both films qualify for award consideration under current rules.)
“I think we have to expand the boundaries of definition, but I’m not sure what it should be at this point,” said John Canemaker, the Oscar-winning animated filmmaker and New York University professor. “I think we have to decide what is and isn’t animation on a case-by-case basis, rather than being doctrinaire about it.”
In the past animation was usually distinguished from live action by two factors: each frame of film was exposed individually, rather than as part of a longer take; and the illusion of movement was created, rather than recorded. But many recent films exceed those parameters.
Motion capture, or mo-cap, for instance, blurs the line by using computers to record the movements of an actor, which can then be reproduced by characters on the screen. (Motion capture was also used to create the kids in “Monster House” and the starkly lighted humans in the French feature “Renaissance.”)
Some animators object to mo-cap, arguing that it leaves no place for their creative input. Others counter that the captured data almost invariably has to be massaged, which means animators adjust the movements, sometimes minimally, sometimes more so. A third camp compares the process to the rotoscope, an early-20th-century device that enables animators to trace live-action footage frame by frame. Walt Disney’s artists used the rotoscope for some scenes of the heroine in “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” (1937). Ralph Bakshi used it extensively in “American Pop” (1981).
“How do we deal with the modern-day equivalent of the rotoscope?” Mr. Canemaker asked. “For that matter, how do we deal with the old version of the rotoscope? ‘Snow White’ is considered animation because of the way they altered the image; the input of the artist was so distinct. There has to be a strong input from the hand of the artist — or, today, the mouse of the artist.”
In a telephone interview from the Pixar Animation Studios in Emeryville, Calif., John Lasseter, the Oscar-winning director of “Cars” and the “Toy Story” films, argued that some element of deliberate distortion will always be of the essence in animation.
“Since animation began, there’s always been a desire to replace the animator and devise a technical way of getting movement,” Mr. Lasseter said. But, he added: “The results always look odd, because in animation you’re creating a caricatured world. Although today’s computer-animated films may be getting closer to reality, they’re still caricatured. To make those worlds believable, the motions need to be caricatured to the same degree as the visuals. When you put realistic motion from live action into a caricatured world, it doesn’t fit.”
Although processed live action hasn’t appeared in mainstream animated films, Richard Linklater used it for “Waking Life” and “A Scanner Darkly.” Under this technique, the film is shot in live action, and the imagery is altered with computer paint programs.
Mr. Lasseter is among those who feel that works of this kind should be considered animation. “It still technically qualifies, as you are manipulating the frames that the audience sees on the screen,” he said. “It’s not a technique you can apply to the live-footage action automatically. It actually has to be manipulated by an artist frame by frame.”
Mr. Canemaker said, “I was intrigued by the look of ‘Waking Life,’ but I felt the film would have fared better if a director of animation had been involved. I didn’t think the sections were as different from one another as they were touted to be. I’m not that fond of literalism in any form of animation: I think the interpretation of the artist is the important thing, and how the hand and mind are seen in the product.”
“Renaissance” and “Scanner Darkly” are art house films aimed at viewers interested in experimental techniques. But an increasing number of big-budget, mainstream movies feature computer-animated characters, from Stuart Little and Garfield to Gollum and King Kong. This fusion of techniques further blurs the distinction between live action and animation.
Should “Garfield: A Tail of Two Kitties,” which places a computer-animated cat in a live-action world, be considered an animated film? Should “Star Wars: Episode III — Revenge of the Sith,” since it is populated with animated robots, vehicles and creatures? Mr. Lasseter said the distinction lies in the filmmaker’s intent. “For me the fundamental question is: Do you want the audience to know this world does not exist, or do you want to make it look like the real world and just expand what you can do in live action?” he said.
“Since I started working with computer animation in 1981, the goal in the computer graphics research world has been to create tools that can reproduce reality,” Mr. Lasseter continued. “I use many of these tools, but I use them to create something the audience knows doesn’t exist, then mess with their minds by making it look real and believable. I think visualizing a believable world that is very fanciful may be harder than taking a photograph and trying to reproduce it.”
Mr. Park summed up what may represent the consensus among animation artists when he said, “I’m anti making things more realistic. Everything in me goes against it.”
His view: “If you aim for realism, and you don’t quite achieve it, it can become very ugly. If you separate your work from reality, the artistry and stylization become the focus. For me that’s the joy of filmmaking. I don’t want to create reality. I’m not interested in reality.”
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:55 (nineteen years ago)
Which means that Who Framed Roger Rabbit probably would've been nominated (and won) if the category had existed in 1988.
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:58 (nineteen years ago)
― i've dreamt of rubies! (Mandee), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 17:00 (nineteen years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 17:13 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 17:24 (nineteen years ago)
― ‘•’u (gear), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:24 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:25 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:34 (nineteen years ago)
― ‘•’u (gear), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:35 (nineteen years ago)
at least the 3 Dreamgirls songs will be good for bathroom breaks.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:36 (nineteen years ago)
Category confusion, I suspect. Apparently, the studio was originally pushing Nicholson for lead and DiCaprio, Damon, and Wahlberg for supporting -- but then (rightfully) changed their mind. I still don't know that DiCaprio is any more of a lead than Damon, though.
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:40 (nineteen years ago)
OH SNAP GO ME.
Also, on February 25th I will be sitting at home waving a little Marky Mark flag, just so everyone knows.
Also fuck the studio for pushing Nicholson over DiCaprio for lead at ANY point. I watched Chinatown last night and am currently lamenting the bygone days of subtle(r) Jack.
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:41 (nineteen years ago)
― ‘•’u (gear), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Charlie Brown (kenan), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:49 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:51 (nineteen years ago)
Don't Streep and Whitaker have less screentime than their lower-billed co-stars? this is old shit, going further back than Brando in The Godfather.
Someone correctly forecast that Jack's dildo scene cost him his nomination. Too rude. He's the best 'character' in the movie except maybe for Baldwin, who doesn't have to carry any of it.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:54 (nineteen years ago)
― ‘•’u (gear), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:55 (nineteen years ago)
We should totally watch the Oscars together this year. None of the other Chicago people really care.
― Charlie Brown (kenan), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:59 (nineteen years ago)
The dildo scene was his idea, right? He had to convince Marty to let him do it.
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 18:59 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 19:00 (nineteen years ago)
― blotter Budweiser Hackeysadk (nickalicious), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 19:01 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 19:14 (nineteen years ago)
According to AMPAS rules, 5 movies will be nominated if there are 16 or more that are eligible, and only 3 will be nominated if there are less than 16 eligible. There must be at least 8 movies eligible in order for the award to be given out.
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 19:15 (nineteen years ago)
Between this and the fanciful ad campaign it's getting, yeah. My wife wants to see this based on the adverts and granted, her favorite movie's Pulp Fiction, but I think this is appealing to the side of her that lurvs Harry Potter.
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 19:32 (nineteen years ago)
According to Burton, when the presenter opened the envelope and read, "The winner is...RICHARD - " he started to rise, until he realized the winner was "Richard Dreyfuss."
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 20:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 20:52 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 20:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 20:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:56 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 21:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 05:58 (nineteen years ago)
― pinkmoose (jacklove), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 08:04 (nineteen years ago)
So wait, which of these movies IS going to win Best Picture?
* "Babel" covers some of the same territory as "Crash," and though it isn't the monstrosity that movie was, it's not great...
* "The Departed" is a fun B-Movie, but pretty massively flawed...
* Nobody's seen "Letters from Iwo Jima"...
* "The Queen" is awfully 'foreign' for the we-like-to-make-a-statement Academy...
* "Little Miss Sunshine" isn't nearly as good as "National Lampoon's Vacaation," but it's a pretty massive crowd pleaser... the little movie that could and all that. I'm predicting the darkhorse/upset/come-from-behind/surprise win.
― Tiki Theater Xymposium (Bent Over at the Arclight), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 11:37 (nineteen years ago)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Who? -- jaymc (jmcunnin...) (webmail), January 23rd, 2007 9:58pm
Much loved, rogueish, British character actor. Peter O'Toole's partner in crime in 'Venus', nominated for a bafta for supporting actor. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leslie_Phillips
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:13 (nineteen years ago)
― pinkmoose (jacklove), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:28 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:24 (nineteen years ago)
"Babel" covers some of the same territory as "Crash,"
Following so soon after it is what hurts it.
"The Departed" is a fun B-Movie, but pretty massively flawed...
(Flaws real or imagined always irrelevant.) It's too nihilistically bloody to win Best Picture.
Nobody's seen "Letters from Iwo Jima"
The Academy members got their screeners sooner than the ones for Dreamgirls. Also, it'd give the Academy a chance to be 'magnanimous' toward the Imperial Japanese Army, and boost a movie that has most of its box office ahead of it.
"The Queen" is awfully 'foreign' for the we-like-to-make-a-statement Academy
Moreso than The English Patient? The Royals sell more tabloids here than in the UK.
"Little Miss Sunshine" isn't nearly as good as "National Lampoon's Vacaation,"
This is the 'edgy' Sundance sitcom slot.
I think it's btwn Babel, The Queen and Iwo Jima.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:24 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:34 (nineteen years ago)
Stephanie Zacharek, pretty good dissection:
http://www.salon.com/ent/feature/2007/01/23/oscars/
I'd like to think that members of the Academy recognized that the picture is really a headache-inducing mess, cluttered with lousy songs, but I know that's wishful thinking. I believe that "Dreamgirls" simply doesn't suit the Academy's solemn, beard-stroking mood this year: Can't have any crazy plaids clashing with those modest stripes.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:38 (nineteen years ago)
Subject: 'Dreamgirls' gets mixed Oscar love | Special Report
― UART variations (ex machina), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:44 (nineteen years ago)
LOL my favorite is when they show a clip from the token foreign screenplay nom and it's always one with NO DIALOGUE SO YOU DON'T KNOW IT NOT ENGLISH.
― Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:45 (nineteen years ago)
Don't you see, giving BP to a mistly subtitled film will be PROGRESS! i.e., a headline for the press.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:52 (nineteen years ago)
Still waiting to hear if it's an Original Screenplay just cuz of the hokey shit Paul Haggis made up.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:53 (nineteen years ago)
― roger goodell (gear), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 19:03 (nineteen years ago)
― roger goodell (gear), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 19:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 19:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 19:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 19:07 (nineteen years ago)
Yeah, what's up with that? The Wikipedia entry says it was based not just on one book but two!
It was based on the books Picture Letters from Commander in Chief by Gen Tadamichi Kuribayashi who is portrayed on screen by Ken Watanabe and Sadness in Dying Gracefully by Kumiko Kakehashi.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letters_from_Iwo_Jima
― Edward III (edward iii), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 19:08 (nineteen years ago)
― roger goodell (gear), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 19:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 19:48 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 20:04 (nineteen years ago)
― blotter Budweiser Hackeysadk (nickalicious), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 20:14 (nineteen years ago)
Babel 14/5
The Departed 2/3
Letters from Iwo Jima 9/1
Little Miss Sunshine 14/5
The Queen 10/1
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 26 January 2007 16:04 (nineteen years ago)
That seems extraordinarily foolish.
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 26 January 2007 19:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 26 January 2007 20:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 26 January 2007 20:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 26 January 2007 20:31 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Friday, 26 January 2007 20:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 26 January 2007 20:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 26 January 2007 20:45 (nineteen years ago)
Is s/he minoring in Quote Whoredom?
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 26 January 2007 20:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 26 January 2007 20:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 26 January 2007 20:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 26 January 2007 21:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 29 January 2007 16:04 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 29 January 2007 16:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 29 January 2007 16:13 (nineteen years ago)
I would think of this as a make-up for The In-Laws.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 29 January 2007 16:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 29 January 2007 17:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 29 January 2007 17:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 29 January 2007 17:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Monday, 29 January 2007 17:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Monday, 29 January 2007 17:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Monday, 29 January 2007 17:53 (nineteen years ago)
I don't recall another year when I disliked all of the Best Picture nominees, and indeed regarded three of their number—Babel, Letters from Iwo Jima and Little Miss Sunshine—as among the year's most noxious emissions....
Perhaps the most dispiriting indicator in all of this is the way that these films give us characters that are two-dimensional signboards rather than persuasively imagined people. It's as if slogans, celebrity, living cartoons and genre caricatures have displaced the traditional human focus of movie art: the complexities of human character and psychology.
http://www.indyweek.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A43645
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 February 2007 15:58 (nineteen years ago)
Boy those Keystone Kops.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 2 February 2007 16:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 February 2007 16:14 (nineteen years ago)
http://srmedia.com/MovieCrowd/
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 8 February 2007 18:04 (nineteen years ago)
It's set to music from Once Upon a Time in America! SO WRONG.
― N.i.c.o.l.e (Ex Leon), Thursday, 8 February 2007 18:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 8 February 2007 19:51 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.popmatters.com/pm/columns/article/10709/the-invincible-stubbornness-of-judi-dench/
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 8 February 2007 21:00 (nineteen years ago)
Still, Dench hasn't yet matched Olivier in Carrie, or been as imperious as his Crassus in Spartacus.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 8 February 2007 21:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 8 February 2007 21:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 8 February 2007 21:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Thursday, 8 February 2007 21:49 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 8 February 2007 21:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H. (Eric H.), Thursday, 8 February 2007 21:56 (nineteen years ago)
Intrathread crosspost! Right after Huillet and Altman.
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 9 February 2007 14:56 (nineteen years ago)
http://www.slantmagazine.com/blog/default.asp?category=2
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 9 February 2007 17:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 21 February 2007 20:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 23 February 2007 14:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 23 February 2007 16:48 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc, Friday, 23 February 2007 17:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III, Friday, 23 February 2007 17:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 23 February 2007 17:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III, Friday, 23 February 2007 17:15 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 23 February 2007 17:24 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc, Friday, 23 February 2007 17:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 23 February 2007 17:25 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc, Friday, 23 February 2007 17:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 23 February 2007 20:23 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc, Friday, 23 February 2007 20:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 23 February 2007 21:46 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb, Friday, 23 February 2007 21:49 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Friday, 23 February 2007 21:51 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc, Friday, 23 February 2007 21:55 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc, Friday, 23 February 2007 21:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H., Friday, 23 February 2007 22:35 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc, Friday, 23 February 2007 22:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H., Friday, 23 February 2007 23:00 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc, Friday, 23 February 2007 23:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H., Friday, 23 February 2007 23:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Saturday, 24 February 2007 17:38 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc, Saturday, 24 February 2007 17:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H., Saturday, 24 February 2007 19:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H., Saturday, 24 February 2007 19:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Lovelace, Sunday, 25 February 2007 22:56 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_, Sunday, 25 February 2007 23:02 (nineteen years ago)
― forksclovetofu, Sunday, 25 February 2007 23:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Sunday, 25 February 2007 23:31 (nineteen years ago)
― forksclovetofu, Monday, 26 February 2007 01:13 (nineteen years ago)
― forksclovetofu, Monday, 26 February 2007 05:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Alba, Monday, 26 February 2007 09:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Alba, Monday, 26 February 2007 11:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Nicole, Monday, 26 February 2007 11:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 26 February 2007 14:31 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc, Monday, 26 February 2007 14:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 26 February 2007 14:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H., Monday, 26 February 2007 18:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Nicole, Monday, 26 February 2007 18:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 26 February 2007 18:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 26 February 2007 18:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Eric H., Monday, 26 February 2007 19:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Nicole, Monday, 26 February 2007 19:04 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 26 February 2007 19:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 26 February 2007 19:35 (nineteen years ago)
― kenan, Monday, 26 February 2007 21:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 26 February 2007 22:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 26 February 2007 22:14 (nineteen years ago)
― kenan, Monday, 26 February 2007 22:27 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco, Monday, 26 February 2007 22:28 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb, Monday, 26 February 2007 22:37 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc, Monday, 26 February 2007 22:39 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco, Monday, 26 February 2007 22:44 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco, Monday, 26 February 2007 22:51 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc, Monday, 26 February 2007 22:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 26 February 2007 22:55 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco, Monday, 26 February 2007 23:00 (nineteen years ago)
― nickalicious, Monday, 26 February 2007 23:01 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco, Monday, 26 February 2007 23:06 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco, Monday, 26 February 2007 23:07 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc, Monday, 26 February 2007 23:13 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco, Monday, 26 February 2007 23:14 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc, Monday, 26 February 2007 23:19 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 00:02 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 00:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 15:14 (nineteen years ago)
― forksclovetofu, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 15:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 16:00 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 16:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 16:13 (nineteen years ago)
Jesus, do I feel sorry for anyone who prefers The Departed to Goodfellas.
― Eric H., Wednesday, 28 February 2007 05:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 28 February 2007 14:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 28 February 2007 14:38 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward III, Wednesday, 28 February 2007 15:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 28 February 2007 15:59 (nineteen years ago)
― dan selzer, Wednesday, 28 February 2007 16:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 28 February 2007 16:12 (nineteen years ago)