― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:27 (eighteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:29 (eighteen years ago)
― Mädchen (Madchen), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:30 (eighteen years ago)
― Johnney B English (stigoftdump), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:31 (eighteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:33 (eighteen years ago)
me = sid btw
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:34 (eighteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:34 (eighteen years ago)
I've seen the trailers for Skins, and it looks a bit shite. Is it supposed to be a sort of Hollyoaks thing but with more sex?
― C J (C J), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:35 (eighteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:35 (eighteen years ago)
― Haikunym (Haikunym), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:36 (eighteen years ago)
It's like Little Britain never happened.
― aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:37 (eighteen years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:37 (eighteen years ago)
Shameless meets Hollyoaks I think. Or Chav This Life.
― onimo (onimo), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:37 (eighteen years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:38 (eighteen years ago)
Cosign.
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:38 (eighteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:39 (eighteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:41 (eighteen years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:44 (eighteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:44 (eighteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:45 (eighteen years ago)
― teh_kit (g-kit), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:45 (eighteen years ago)
― reverto levidensis (blueski), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:46 (eighteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:46 (eighteen years ago)
xpost
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:46 (eighteen years ago)
― reverto levidensis (blueski), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:47 (eighteen years ago)
Was it called "What-everrrrr"?
― teh_kit (g-kit), Thursday, 11 January 2007 12:48 (eighteen years ago)
― Anna (Anna), Thursday, 11 January 2007 13:13 (eighteen years ago)
― reverto levidensis (blueski), Thursday, 11 January 2007 13:15 (eighteen years ago)
― Johnney B English (stigoftdump), Thursday, 11 January 2007 13:17 (eighteen years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 11 January 2007 13:17 (eighteen years ago)
― Anna (Anna), Thursday, 11 January 2007 13:20 (eighteen years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 11 January 2007 18:06 (eighteen years ago)
― Luke Slater (Alan Bean), Saturday, 13 January 2007 22:20 (eighteen years ago)
― DavidM* (unreal), Saturday, 13 January 2007 22:31 (eighteen years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Monday, 22 January 2007 18:19 (eighteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:01 (eighteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:04 (eighteen years ago)
Have seen more ELECTRIC BLUE LEGGINGS recently - can I blame Skins?
― Bhumibol Adulyadej can't go when you're all lookin' (Lucretia My Reflection), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:18 (eighteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:19 (eighteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:21 (eighteen years ago)
― Mädchen (Madchen), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:22 (eighteen years ago)
We are old, we can't be expected to know what's on telly when.
― Bhumibol Adulyadej (Lucretia My Reflection), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:25 (eighteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:31 (eighteen years ago)
― Bhumibol Adulyadej (Lucretia My Reflection), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:36 (eighteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:36 (eighteen years ago)
And zebra print smock top!
I REALLY WANT TO MOVE AWAY FROM NEW CROSS NOW
― Bhumibol Adulyadej (Lucretia My Reflection), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:37 (eighteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 16:00 (eighteen years ago)
Anyway, I get the creeps when I see the About a Boy kid too. I think I will watch it in a state of revulsion.
My style hasn't changed in 30 years. Damn.
― jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:54 (eighteen years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:55 (eighteen years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:57 (eighteen years ago)
― secondhandnews (secondhandnews), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 19:53 (eighteen years ago)
― Suedey (John Cei Douglas), Thursday, 25 January 2007 13:06 (eighteen years ago)
please to make website to house drawings done by you of numerous tv shows ala the this life one
― vita susicivus (blueski), Thursday, 25 January 2007 13:09 (eighteen years ago)
― wogan lenin (dog latin), Thursday, 25 January 2007 13:13 (eighteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Thursday, 25 January 2007 13:19 (eighteen years ago)
It's not!
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 25 January 2007 13:26 (eighteen years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 25 January 2007 13:27 (eighteen years ago)
― Mädchen (Madchen), Thursday, 25 January 2007 13:35 (eighteen years ago)
OTM
― Michael Philip Philip Philip Philip Annoyman (Ferg), Thursday, 25 January 2007 14:51 (eighteen years ago)
I only just noticed the similarity of repulsion and revulsion.
― jel -- (jel), Thursday, 25 January 2007 17:50 (eighteen years ago)
― DavidM* (unreal), Thursday, 25 January 2007 22:33 (eighteen years ago)
― wogan lenin (dog latin), Friday, 26 January 2007 01:38 (eighteen years ago)
"What fucking hospital is that supposed to be?""Hang on, how the fuck did they drive there?""I reckon that's Montpelier.""Haha, Channel 4 hate Bradley Stoke too."
The overall impression I got was it was a bit like that scene in Road Trip (which only springs to mind because I accidentally saw 5 minutes of it the other night which flicking channels) where Tom Green is telling the story to the crowd in the football station and the girl points out how unlikely it is the woman in the story would be topless. Green answers something like "She was too, in fact she was totally naked and had a hott body. That's completely believable and justified by the story."
Trailer for next week: Teens, TITS, teens, TITS, DRUQS, TITS, teens, moping, NUDDY TEECHER. Can't wait.
― aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Friday, 26 January 2007 10:26 (eighteen years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Friday, 26 January 2007 10:30 (eighteen years ago)
Hmm, that was also this week's episode, but with added everyone self-consiously swearing into their mobile phones for the first 20 minutes.
Amazingly Harry Enfield's vast, hairy beer gut wasn't the most awful thing about this.
― DavidM* (unreal), Friday, 26 January 2007 10:38 (eighteen years ago)
― Koogy Bloogies (koogs), Friday, 26 January 2007 10:39 (eighteen years ago)
― emsk ( emsk), Friday, 26 January 2007 10:42 (eighteen years ago)
I did not watch it, the programme.
Is it like KIDS? I liked that, back in the day.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 26 January 2007 11:11 (eighteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Friday, 26 January 2007 11:15 (eighteen years ago)
guardian hated it. i didn't see it.
― Koogy Bloogies (koogs), Friday, 26 January 2007 11:32 (eighteen years ago)
What I don't understand - how did they watch it before coming on air when it was on while they were on air? Have they got some kind of digital recording device that accelerates... erm... particles?
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 26 January 2007 11:38 (eighteen years ago)
― DavidM* (unreal), Friday, 26 January 2007 11:43 (eighteen years ago)
― Anna (Anna), Friday, 26 January 2007 13:29 (eighteen years ago)
― acrobat (elwisty), Friday, 26 January 2007 13:35 (eighteen years ago)
;_;
― to scour or to pop? (Haberdager), Friday, 26 January 2007 14:12 (eighteen years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Friday, 26 January 2007 17:36 (eighteen years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Friday, 26 January 2007 17:38 (eighteen years ago)
― chap (chap), Friday, 26 January 2007 17:42 (eighteen years ago)
Actually, I made Michelle look like Robert Smith from the Cure.
― jel -- (jel), Friday, 26 January 2007 17:45 (eighteen years ago)
― marianna lcl (marianna lcl), Friday, 26 January 2007 17:48 (eighteen years ago)
― DavidM* (unreal), Friday, 26 January 2007 18:24 (eighteen years ago)
I watched this programme last night, second half first (after Benidorm) and then the first half of the first half on E4+1. Good system. Anyway, I thought it was quite good, considering. Certainly nowhere near as bad as I expected. It made me laugh a few times, and I thought some of the actors were good. It made me want to put little stickers on my mobile phone.
I was wondering how they would get round the problem of teen nudity, and it turns out they get round it by having the teachers in the nude instead. Yay, everyone's a winner, etc.
I hope it comes in to be subtitled. Have you had it, Michael?
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:12 (eighteen years ago)
NB - I have not seen Skins and don't really intend to.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:21 (eighteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Friday, 2 February 2007 09:24 (eighteen years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:41 (eighteen years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:43 (eighteen years ago)
There was a bit last night where she stuck a post-it to the bus window that was, um, really good, proper good.
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:51 (eighteen years ago)
I couldn't find myself objecting to the Tony character in the way DavidM did, because he seemed so evidently to be a proper plank as well as all those other things. (proper xpost)
― Tim (Tim), Friday, 2 February 2007 10:55 (eighteen years ago)
― george bob (george bob), Friday, 2 February 2007 11:08 (eighteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Friday, 2 February 2007 11:10 (eighteen years ago)
*cough* you never saw Metrosexuality then?
― Forest Pines (ForestPines), Friday, 2 February 2007 11:21 (eighteen years ago)
― DavidM* (unreal), Friday, 2 February 2007 11:24 (eighteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Friday, 2 February 2007 11:25 (eighteen years ago)
― Tim (Tim), Friday, 2 February 2007 11:27 (eighteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Friday, 2 February 2007 11:27 (eighteen years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Friday, 2 February 2007 17:41 (eighteen years ago)
― chap (chap), Friday, 2 February 2007 18:33 (eighteen years ago)
It's a lot more leisurely than I would of expected. Not neccessarily a bad thing, though it could do with some more gags to hold the attention. The broadly caricatured marginal characters (the drug dealer, Cassie's parents) really didn't work. Cassie and Sid, on the other hand, are both very likeable and convincing (I swear half the girls at my sixth form were a bit like Cassie). In conclusion: undecided, will watch next week.
― chap (chap), Monday, 5 February 2007 00:20 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.myspace.com/e4skins2
Also I am thinking of joining MySpace just so I can "add" Cassie:
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=140518778
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Monday, 5 February 2007 09:41 (eighteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Monday, 5 February 2007 09:53 (eighteen years ago)
I guess if you're not drawing any more, I'll have to watch it.
Or not.
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 5 February 2007 09:55 (eighteen years ago)
― Anna (Anna), Monday, 5 February 2007 11:29 (eighteen years ago)
I quite like how the Mad Twatter charecter is portrayed. Other than looking like a Crimean War deserter, the actor seems to have made him more than the Begbie-alike the script seems to want him to be.
― DavidM* (unreal), Monday, 5 February 2007 12:11 (eighteen years ago)
"Look up if you like me"
And those taxi driver scenes.
Talk about bizarre tonal swings, though. One minute it's like that, and the next there's some totally OTT scene with the comic book head of the anorexia clinic. And then Mad Twatter turns up in some group therapy session wtf.
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 6 February 2007 00:12 (eighteen years ago)
― chap (chap), Tuesday, 6 February 2007 01:56 (eighteen years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 6 February 2007 10:03 (eighteen years ago)
― PJ Miller (PJ Miller 68), Tuesday, 6 February 2007 10:57 (eighteen years ago)
I wonder if da kids like it.
― chap (chap), Thursday, 8 February 2007 23:10 (eighteen years ago)
Still, Cassie's brief appearance last night was superb, the resentment sneaking through quietly and the "yeah, wow" seeming more obviously a veiled threat than it had previously done. The "Tony sneaking off with one-note posh bint behind Michelle's back" also seems interesting - my girlfriend reckons that Tony's good side will eventually come out, but I'm really not sure that it will, or should. To be fair, I would kind of like Tony to fall under a truck.
The trailer for next week seemed a bit worrying - it's Chris-centric, which means either pills or psychology teacher or, er, both.
― William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Friday, 9 February 2007 16:22 (eighteen years ago)
― the next grozart, Monday, 26 February 2007 10:27 (eighteen years ago)
― Alba, Monday, 26 February 2007 10:58 (eighteen years ago)
― Anna, Monday, 26 February 2007 12:55 (eighteen years ago)
― Alba, Monday, 26 February 2007 12:58 (eighteen years ago)
― Anna, Monday, 26 February 2007 12:59 (eighteen years ago)
― PJ Miller, Monday, 26 February 2007 14:48 (eighteen years ago)
― titchyschneiderMk2, Monday, 26 February 2007 19:35 (eighteen years ago)
― the next grozart, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 01:30 (eighteen years ago)
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 01:56 (eighteen years ago)
― chap, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 14:28 (eighteen years ago)
― Gukbe, Thursday, 1 March 2007 20:01 (eighteen years ago)
― jel --, Thursday, 1 March 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)
― Gukbe, Thursday, 1 March 2007 23:19 (eighteen years ago)
― William Bloody Swygart, Thursday, 1 March 2007 23:30 (eighteen years ago)
― the next grozart, Friday, 2 March 2007 14:04 (eighteen years ago)
― chap, Friday, 2 March 2007 14:19 (eighteen years ago)
― William Bloody Swygart, Friday, 2 March 2007 16:51 (eighteen years ago)
― jel --, Friday, 2 March 2007 17:55 (eighteen years ago)
― chap, Friday, 2 March 2007 19:35 (eighteen years ago)
― jel --, Friday, 2 March 2007 20:09 (eighteen years ago)
― chap, Friday, 2 March 2007 20:16 (eighteen years ago)
― jel --, Friday, 2 March 2007 20:17 (eighteen years ago)
― Ismael Klata, Sunday, 4 March 2007 19:56 (eighteen years ago)
― nifkin, Sunday, 11 March 2007 02:06 (eighteen years ago)
― the next grozart, Sunday, 11 March 2007 03:02 (eighteen years ago)
― chap, Sunday, 11 March 2007 03:09 (eighteen years ago)
― the next grozart, Sunday, 11 March 2007 03:39 (eighteen years ago)
― Ismael Klata, Friday, 16 March 2007 13:47 (eighteen years ago)
― chap, Friday, 23 March 2007 00:15 (eighteen years ago)
― jel --, Friday, 23 March 2007 10:07 (eighteen years ago)
― chap, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:21 (eighteen years ago)
― Anna, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:42 (eighteen years ago)
― chap, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:44 (eighteen years ago)
― Will M., Monday, 26 March 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)
lol my gran watches this
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 21:08 (eighteen years ago)
adverts make it look so bad
― RJG, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 21:10 (eighteen years ago)
lol at the one band that makers of this show have decided to push as The Skins Band for major mainstream fame being FOALS
― Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 21:18 (eighteen years ago)
Maybe they should have used MIA/The Horrors/other punchline
― Dom Passantino, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 21:19 (eighteen years ago)
is this show funnier than Shameless?
― blueski, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 21:29 (eighteen years ago)
The actress who plays Jal was on Channel 4 last week meeting Amerie. She was so unstarlike it was beyond endearing, more WTF: "OMG I can't believe I'm meeting you, I love your music so much, me and my friends learn all your dance routines, we practice them everyday"
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 29 August 2007 06:30 (eighteen years ago)
I'm rather enjoying this and I usually hate similar programmes. Despite it being clumsy, rough around the edges and utter bollocks in places I do actually care what happens to the characters.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 August 2007 08:19 (eighteen years ago)
I quite like the one Foals record I've heard as well and wouldn't be particularly surprised if they ended up selling a fair few records.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 29 August 2007 08:24 (eighteen years ago)
So is there a new series or what? I'm confused by all this multi-platform multi-media meganet secret episode stuff the kids are into these days.
― the next grozart, Wednesday, 29 August 2007 10:44 (eighteen years ago)
am i alone i thinking that the male school teacher looks like ilx poster jaymc? i think it is at this point i realize i look at ilx too much.
― acrobat, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 14:58 (eighteen years ago)
Seems to be received wisdom but I'll say it anyway: the Cassie and Chris episodes of season 1 were amazing. What's the second series been like so far?
― czn, Friday, 19 October 2007 11:38 (eighteen years ago)
Prematurely Aged Snarky Englanders
PASE never really took off as a term like LBZC did.
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 19 October 2007 12:55 (eighteen years ago)
I don't think the second series has started has it?
I enjoyed all the first series, even the bits that were a bit bollocks.
― Matt DC, Friday, 19 October 2007 13:01 (eighteen years ago)
http://i8.ebayimg.com/02/i/000/af/8b/70d0_1.JPG
Am I too aged to wear this hoodie (you can't see but the spots are red).
― the next grozart, Friday, 19 October 2007 13:05 (eighteen years ago)
Wiki sez "Channel 4 have confirmed that skins season 2 will be aired in the early new year on E4."
― Will M., Friday, 19 October 2007 16:46 (eighteen years ago)
But I doubt they said "season."
I am working through the first series after someone gave me the DVD, and I've seen 3 eps so far: Tony; Cassie; Jal. The Cassie ep. was excellent, and the Jal ep is some of the worst writing I have ever seen in my life. The hip-hop brothers/father; the "Three's Company" style overheard-shop-dressing-room-innuendo routine; etc. I don't know why they have to direct all the teachers to be so BROAD.
Will it get better and go back to some of the good "look up if you like me" Cassie stuff, or should I cut my losses and get out now?
I like the thing they've done in 2 eps where the ending cuts to black just as the focal character is about to launch into something (Cassie biting the burger; Jal playing her concert)
The new promo with Radiohead's "Nude" playing and the teenorgy in full swing is pretty great.
― Savannah Smiles, Friday, 8 February 2008 12:55 (seventeen years ago)
I'd stick with it, I enjoyed it more and more as the series progressed.
― chap, Friday, 8 February 2008 13:33 (seventeen years ago)
You might want to skip the one where they go to Russia though, that one was embarrassing.
― chap, Friday, 8 February 2008 13:34 (seventeen years ago)
this isn't the police academy thread.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Friday, 8 February 2008 13:35 (seventeen years ago)
The Cassie episode beat all others, but there was at least one other really good espisode. The first episode and the Simon Amstel written episode (the trip) were by far the worst. Series 2 tonight!
― DavidM, Friday, 8 February 2008 13:59 (seventeen years ago)
Really?
― chap, Friday, 8 February 2008 14:18 (seventeen years ago)
You're lying, it's monday.
― chap, Friday, 8 February 2008 14:22 (seventeen years ago)
Cassie episode was the best. I think the Chris episode was pretty good, and the Effy one as well.
Charlie Brooker on the new series (spoilers for first series):
http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguide/columnists/story/0,,2253804,00.html
― Gukbe, Saturday, 9 February 2008 09:08 (seventeen years ago)
This show missed out on some hugs.
― Bodrick III, Saturday, 9 February 2008 14:02 (seventeen years ago)
Cassie, Chris and Effy definitely the best three (in that order). I saw the Series 2 trailer in the cinema last week, along with the Dr Who one. It was very odd. I think it was inspired by the bizarreness of the Lost trailer with them all ballroom dancing on the beach.
― Alba, Saturday, 9 February 2008 15:30 (seventeen years ago)
this show sucked <---truth
― DG, Saturday, 9 February 2008 17:38 (seventeen years ago)
i didn't watch much of it (because it's for teenagers guys srsly) but what this guy said^^
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Saturday, 9 February 2008 17:42 (seventeen years ago)
I rather enjoyed that. Maxxie still can't act particularly well, the main plotline was, well, not much of a main plotline, but it set things up nicely, there were some pretty decent jokes, and, implausible as the introduction of Anwar was, the use of "I Wanna Fuck You" was probably as appropriate as it will ever be. Thumbs up, more or less.
― William Bloody Swygart, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 00:39 (seventeen years ago)
It was good. Thoroughly engaging and very confident. I have high hopes for this series.
― chap, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 02:23 (seventeen years ago)
As someone who enjoyed even the bits of series one that were a bit rubbish, I thought this was a bit of a mess. Seemed oddly disjointed and the comedy was weaker and jarred with the (rather good) emo bits. Harry Enfield was terrible again, Bill Bailey did gamely enough but was miscast. Some of the setpieces didn't work particularly well - the Cassie video WTF? Sid with a giant picture of Cassie above his bed WTF?
Also, the trend of fleshing out characters only to reduce them to ridiculous caricatures the following week looks set to continue, possibly more annoyingly this time.
That said, the scene with Tony trying to write his name and then smashing the place up really got to me. Good work in turning him from arsehole to sympathy figure, but can't help thinking the show needs a new arsehole for balance.
That party looked fun though.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 09:31 (seventeen years ago)
Actually some new characters would probably help full stop what with the various relationships having altered so much.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 09:32 (seventeen years ago)
Tonight's episode, thus far, is really very good. New character!
― William Bloody Swygart, Monday, 18 February 2008 22:31 (seventeen years ago)
Plus also LAURA MUTHA-FUCKIN' CANTRELL on the soundtrack!
― William Bloody Swygart, Monday, 18 February 2008 22:32 (seventeen years ago)
OK, and now it's got kinda scary.
― William Bloody Swygart, Monday, 18 February 2008 22:42 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah that one was so much better than the first. Skins does pathos very well anyway, especially that scene where she lashed out at her mum, but the comedy matched up in that one as well, mostly because the musical was roffles.
The amount of screen time the different characters get feels a bit weird so far - Maxxie's been kind of the central character and we've had about five minutes of Sid.
― Matt DC, Monday, 18 February 2008 23:10 (seventeen years ago)
Actually, thinking about it a bit more, I'm not sure it was that great: the late swerves with Sketch's character seemed a bit too easy, putting her outside the main gang and thus making her an irredeemable weirdo. I was kinda hoping it'd go a bit Heathers, really (which it probably will, eventually).
― William Bloody Swygart, Monday, 18 February 2008 23:56 (seventeen years ago)
I felt you still kind of empathised with Sketch throughout because they spent such a long time setting her up. We ain't seen the last of her, anyway.
I continue to be impressed. It's very good on parent/child realionships.
― chap, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 01:50 (seventeen years ago)
She's not quite outside the main gang - Maxxie and Michelle probably won't want to go anywhere near her, Anwar might well be a bit lost puppy and the others probably aren't that bothered.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 09:37 (seventeen years ago)
Is it wrong to like Sketch. I loved that look in her eyes in the end, especially when matched to the Aqualung song.
― youcangoyourownway, Thursday, 21 February 2008 21:32 (seventeen years ago)
Dear me, but I do believe this series is actually getting better and better. Peter Capaldi is pretty ruddy brilliant. He's sort of like Dennis the Menace's Dad in an actual mid-life crisis. Which is good. No, really.
― William Bloody Swygart, Monday, 25 February 2008 22:24 (seventeen years ago)
"Crystal Castles! Woo!"
― William Bloody Swygart, Monday, 25 February 2008 22:57 (seventeen years ago)
oh no i missed another episode
― DG, Monday, 25 February 2008 23:13 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah that one was fantastic, the scene where Sid and Tony are at the gig and Sid just loses it but it's all drowned out by that rubbish Crystal Castles song = one of those great setpieces that Skins seemingly spends entire epsides trying to set up.
Peter Capaldi is by miles the best dad in this.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 09:10 (seventeen years ago)
Last night's episode was one of the best bits of television I've seen in a long time. This show still ain't old.
― the next grozart, Tuesday, 26 February 2008 23:45 (seventeen years ago)
You're right about that club scene though Matt - the shitness of that Crystal Castles track almost makes the scene even more messed up and horrible.
― the next grozart, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 00:22 (seventeen years ago)
Uneven episode that. 'Bitch not actually a bitch' plot was incredibly predictable, and the sex scene was straight out of a cheesy Channel 5 TV movie. Great cliffhanger though, and the beach scenes were surprisingly beautifully shot.
― chap, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 00:16 (seventeen years ago)
Aye, probably weakest episode thus far, if only cos Michelle... well, she's never really had much of a character, has she? I just see her stropping about the place looking miffed and I feel like I've missed some massive reason as to why I should care about this. Yes, boyfriend in a coma then out of coma but with memory impaired etc. etc., but there seems to be a serious lack of motive or compulsion about her. I think it might be that April Pearson isn't really a good enough actress to be bringing out the various shades that seem to be lurking within Michelle, but also that the scripts seem to just veer away from leading her into really deep waters; for instance, her sudden decision to befriend Sketch after the alleged Shane Richie incident - there was an opportunity to show up the more shallow, patronising side to Michelle there, that she only wanted to get to know Sketch because she thinks she's been through something horrible, but doesn't have any interest in Sketch as a person - but instead it got overtaken by the whole OMG Sketch is teh creepy thing.
This episode was one where the caricatures that Skins has done a very effective job of using this series didn't work. I am really, really hoping Michelle's stepdad doesn't come up again, he was rubbish - I mean, it's good that he wasn't a complete bastard or anything, so there's less obvious reason to root against him, but he just didn't add anything when he was on screen. Like you say, Scarlett's initial plot arc was very by-numbers, like all those kids' shows where Lead Kid's single parent starts seeing someone else and Lead Kid gets resentful but then comes round in the end - there didn't seem to be any reason why she puts on the act, it's just "Oh I am putting it on I am actually dead emo inside" and then Michelle is like "Hey I also am dead emo too perhaps we have something in common after all" "Yes" "Yes". Still, there's time for her character to grow, though what avenues are open for her at present I am not sure.
I am also still hoping there is some kind of redemptive swerve for Sketch. She is getting way too THE PREFECTS ARE THE VOICE OF THE HEADMASTER now, even if this is bringing much Anwar-related lolz ("I've transferred my affections." "You see Max? She's transferred her affections!"). I suspect that a swerve of some kind is coming, it seems too obvious not to, but Skins has bottled out of these types of things before, and I suspect it might do here too.
Still, the Sid-Mich-Cassie triangle does look promising, just cos when Cassie turned up at the end, she was wearing that sort of dazed, imperceptible smile she does when she doesn't want to let people in. Cassie is still the best character on this programme, cos you never know quite where she's standing, or what she's thinking. Her reaction to them kissing was not to immediately unleash wrath or anything, but that doesn't necessarily mean that she's not angry... It's a nice wee set-up.
That shot of the sun rising/setting behind Michelle as she sat up with Sid asleep next to her was gorgeous, yes. Possibly they were showing off a bit, mind, but it did look very swishy.
― William Bloody Swygart, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 01:50 (seventeen years ago)
That shot of the sun rising/setting behind Michelle as she sat up with Sid asleep next to her was gorgeous, yes.
There were also some shots of Michelle walking moodily between two dunes which were really nicely composed and colour saturated.
― chap, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 02:02 (seventeen years ago)
Josie Long's turned up. Joe Dempsie is quite comprehensively out-funnying her thus far.
― William Bloody Swygart, Monday, 10 March 2008 22:10 (seventeen years ago)
Hmmm... I am now slightly worried that this series is starting to veer off the rails a little. That one seemed to be having a lot of trouble keeping its continuity together. There were some very good moments, but there was a lot that felt it needed more fleshing out. The dramatic elements... I dunno, the Chris-Jal thing felt (again) like it had been sprung on the viewer without giving them a reason to care. Jal's positive pregnancy test was a swerve that just felt like it didn't have any weight to it, and Jal's acting didn't feel like it did either. She's been treated like too much of a subsidiary character, even in this episode, so she's not had room to really develop character at all.
There were some very good bits, though - Cassie's really, really evil bit to Jal was fantastically done. Anwar's dumping of Sketch was very nicely handled, too. Still, though. Hmm.
― William Bloody Swygart, Monday, 10 March 2008 23:33 (seventeen years ago)
I can see most of your complaints are valid. However, everything continues to be handled with such confidence and verve that I'm still enjoying it pretty much unreservedly. I find Jal to be very sympathetic - obviously such a good-hearted girl, which is as much down to the performance as the writing. I like how last episode's Big Development (ie Sid/Michele) was very much kept in the background; solid, patient storytelling.
That one was directed by Harry Enfield, in case no one else noticed.
― chap, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 00:19 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, I agree with chap. A lot of critics seem to be shooting the writing down before it's even had a chance to get up.
― the next grozart, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 00:41 (seventeen years ago)
I think said confidence and verve was very evident in all the episodes thus far, but not this one. Something just wasn't right with this, and I don't know if it was the writing or what, but things just seemed to happen without a huge amount of rationale. Jal's pregnancy just came up and then nothing else was related to it for the rest of the episode. The cliffhanger from last episode seemed to get bodged together in this one - last episode leaves Sid, Michelle and Cassie in the bedroom together, and then they all bump into each other at the club and there's this air of awkwardness about it like Cassie hadn't seem them together before, like absolutely nothing happened after the closing shot of the previous episode.
And I don't know if it's just because Skins leans too heavily on Joe Dempsie as a comic actor, but the depths he was meant to be plumbing didn't seem especially deep. I bought him and Jal as a couple, yes, but I didn't really feel anything for them, and I'm not sure why this is. There felt like a lack of history or reason for it happening.
Cassie was fantastic. Her little bit of expositionary dialogue at the end kind of clunked, but the way her dazed shield was starting to slip, and she made her contempt for people increasingly obvious, was brilliant. You never know if you're meant to be on her side or not, and that ambiguity makes her fascinating - the sense that in her, there is a character who can get really deeply nasty, but at the same time remains highly sympathetic, too.
Confidence and verve is working best with Anwar, though. He's painted very broadly, but he's doing a brilliant job this series - one could argue that his "reciting the films of Hugh Grant" thing seemed kinda tacked on, but they sold it perfectly, and it just carried through. The reveal of Sketch trying to turn him into Maxxie was run fantastically through the episode, too, such that it really was hilarious when Anwar turned up with his blond hair and it all became clear.
― William Bloody Swygart, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 01:11 (seventeen years ago)
anwar is the funniest thing in this.
i dont get all the hype about skins, esp this new series. what the fuck are all the critics seeing that im not? its best when its just funny, cos this series has next to NO depth from where im standing. i hate it when they try to get 'deep' about a character or something, it just fails miserably. it needs to just be happy being a lighthearted dramedy about not very much, rather than trying to Say Something Important About Modern Teenagers.
W10 last night on bbc3 was better than this shit.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 19:09 (seventeen years ago)
anyone know where i can stream these? i liked the episodes i saw from the first season
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 11 March 2008 19:10 (seventeen years ago)
"critics seem to be shooting the writing down before it's even had a chance to get up."
its not going up anywhere.
― titchyschneiderMk2, Tuesday, 11 March 2008 19:14 (seventeen years ago)
There was that one mega, mega LOL (when the dealer was explaining his Caribbean Pizza Idea) and decent enough plotting ...
... Actually, come to think of it, plot is what made it feel like actual television. Skins seems like something else entirely, based on its complete lack of interest in triggering any of the common reactions (such as sympathy/antipathy/surprise/laughter/interest) I've come to expect from television over the past 20+ years. It is completely dimensionless, as lacking in ulterior motives as it is in genuine efforts to entertain, and it simply makes no attempt to reward a viewer for sticking around longer than the initial episode.
No, Skins is more like a database object, a browser plug-in, or a spreadsheet listing aggregated consumer preferences. But it's certainly not television, whatever it is.
― fields of salmon, Thursday, 13 March 2008 02:56 (seventeen years ago)
^^^ So rong. I really care about the characters even when this feels half-arsed or cobbled together. Tony in the swimming pool with his dad, wearing arm bands and being slower than all the little kids = the sort of detail this show does really well.
The Jal pregnancy story has a way left to run before it's filled out, almost certainly, she'll get her own episode right? Bearing in mind she hasn't even told Chris yet.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 13 March 2008 09:28 (seventeen years ago)
Tony's awful. I won't be conned by his "recovery."
― fields of salmon, Thursday, 13 March 2008 19:44 (seventeen years ago)
Imagine if series 2 ended with him getting hit by a bus AGAIN.
― Alba, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:46 (seventeen years ago)
You see now THAT would be good television.
― fields of salmon, Thursday, 13 March 2008 22:48 (seventeen years ago)
Spose you've gotta give them some credit for having the balls to try out vaguely Lynchian narrative experiments in a teen soap, but that didn't really work, did it? Like, at all.
― chap, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 00:06 (seventeen years ago)
I liked segments 1, 2, and 4.
― G00blar, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 00:09 (seventeen years ago)
Segments 1 and 4 were fine.
― chap, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 00:10 (seventeen years ago)
I was mostly freaked out that he was wandering around Exeter University, where I spent extremely unhappy year a decade ago and the music was reflecting that. When the Sparklehorse song came on I thought someone was having a laugh at my expense.
Presumably that was Tony's reaction to the pill and most of that episode happened when he was hiding under the bed? I was a bit disappointed that the episode didn't end with him freaking out totally and being sectioned or something, that seemed to be where it was going.
The middle section was all a bit of a mess but the bit with the dude on the train was genuinely creepy. The rest was fine, once again Anwar brings the lols.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 00:20 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, it was obviously all taking place in his head (chuckles to be had from stupid literal-minded Guide reviewer complaining that we never find out who the girl is).
― chap, Tuesday, 18 March 2008 00:27 (seventeen years ago)
Oh, I loved that episode. Come on, no one else is doing this. In the past, the super-heightened parts have been in short bursts that have sometimes jarred, but to have the whole hour in that kind of daze was much more satisfying.
The writers seem to be kind of as in love with Effy as Tony is. It's sweet. Looking forward to her episode next week.
― Alba, Wednesday, 19 March 2008 23:39 (seventeen years ago)
No, this episode kind of irked me somewhat. Not really an awful lot of lols, and I really really don't like Effy's character. Plus I'm not even sure Tony really deserves Michelle. I wish Effy would just turn round to her brother and tell him to stop being a dick, but then I guess they've always stuck up for each other despite the fact they're both insufferable sociopaths.
― the next grozart, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 00:16 (seventeen years ago)
Ugh, with the exception of Sketch's storyline all of the season 2 episodes have been quite boring. I just think the characters from season 1 have been played out. Time for a new batch.
― youcangoyourownway, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 00:31 (seventeen years ago)
So far the Sid dead dad episode has been the best so far. Hopefully the series hasn't peaked quite yet. There are new characters, specifically Sketch and that obnoxious new girl who has to hang out with Effy.
― the next grozart, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 12:57 (seventeen years ago)
Kind of harsh how no one really seems to give a shit about Sid's dad dying.
The scenes with the art teacher reminded me of my A-Level English teacher who used to gratuitously mention the times she fucked Oliver Reed, usually in reference to Heathcliff/Stanley/other popular violent misogynists in literature.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 11:27 (seventeen years ago)
How old was she meant to be? Her talk of modelling for Braque seemed a little far-fetched. Oh, what am I on about, it's Skins.
― Alba, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 13:59 (seventeen years ago)
OK wow that episode, best of the series I think - the scene with Jal in the hospital as they pulled Chris away, with Low playing in the background = amazing TV. They're really good at scenes like that.
I hope Chris is okay, although I'd gone through most of that episode expecting Jal to come home and just find him dead in flat.
― Matt DC, Monday, 31 March 2008 23:16 (seventeen years ago)
<3<3<3
― G00blar, Monday, 7 April 2008 22:06 (seventeen years ago)
― Matt DC, Monday, 7 April 2008 22:07 (seventeen years ago)
I am left rather bemused. Last episode was pretty great - written entirely by Posh Kenneth, too - but this one... hmm.
― William Bloody Swygart, Monday, 7 April 2008 22:08 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, I know xpost.
― G00blar, Monday, 7 April 2008 22:08 (seventeen years ago)
Really? I feel the opposite, I think.
It seemed to be building to something and then straight after Chris's death with all the New York stuff I was all "look get the fuck back to Bristol so we can see what's happening". The first half was great though.
I just don't like Cassie's S2 character at all, really. Presumably that's it for her? Jal's character, on the other hand, has really come on in this series - she's up for something big next week.
Anwar seems a funny character to end the series on but that stalker storyline still needs resolution.
― Matt DC, Monday, 7 April 2008 22:11 (seventeen years ago)
Also that death scene was like Danny Kendall levels of disturbing.
― Matt DC, Monday, 7 April 2008 22:13 (seventeen years ago)
yeah, the amount of teenage passive-aggressive selfishness in this episode was rather hard to bear. Plus the New York thing was just... silly, no?
ONe thing, though - Cassie's face is pretty amazing. The scene at the end when she's crying, and the way it seems to keep hovering on the verge of laughing, or trying to form that mask... she's a bloody good actress when she's not being given the dialogue she got given in the exam room.
― William Bloody Swygart, Monday, 7 April 2008 22:16 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, I finally 'get' Cassie as a good character. I thought the New York part was great--the whole episode's extremity seemed to mirror Cassie's character--tho I can see getting annoyed with only one episode left that it's a total digression.
― G00blar, Monday, 7 April 2008 22:19 (seventeen years ago)
I was actually kind of angry with Cassie for COMPLETELY failing to look after Chris properly and I couldn't work out whether I was meant to sympathise with her at all. In the first series I did, now I just think she's selfish.
― Matt DC, Monday, 7 April 2008 22:21 (seventeen years ago)
Ah, yeah, I need to watch the 1st series. I think she's a total selfish bastard; this episode has strangely made her like her anyway.
― G00blar, Monday, 7 April 2008 22:22 (seventeen years ago)
The girl playing Cassie has clearly been pissing off the writers in some way, because Cassie went from my most favorite character in Series 1 to my least favorite in Series 2. Jal on the other hand has shot up to the top.
I was already spoiled with Chris' death last week, but how was the scene depicted. Am I going to cry? :(
― youcangoyourownway, Monday, 7 April 2008 22:23 (seventeen years ago)
Maybe.
― G00blar, Monday, 7 April 2008 22:28 (seventeen years ago)
Also, new series with an entirely new cast next year apparently. I thought they might build it around Effy to give it a bit of continuity but maybe not.
― Matt DC, Monday, 7 April 2008 22:30 (seventeen years ago)
I was trying to watch the plus-one, but it hit that dinner party scene and the problem with the one-episode-per-character structure of the series leapt out - there has not been any progression in the MichelleSidCassieTony love quadrangle for ages, and the dialogue they were going over was the same bloody thing, and it was just dragging like a wounded limb. Nearly two series and Michelle still does not have a character. Cassie still moaning in the same manner she has done for four whole episodes and it hasn't moved on even slightly.
Having read the Radio Times description, next week's episode does not appear to even slightly be about Anwar.
― William Bloody Swygart, Monday, 7 April 2008 22:32 (seventeen years ago)
What?! Jeez.
I'm gonna rent S1 dvds...apparently a lot of the music's different because of licensing issues?
xpost agreed completely about michelle/sid/tony
― G00blar, Monday, 7 April 2008 22:33 (seventeen years ago)
That'd be a bit harsh on the kid that plays Anwar. I suspect they might do what they did with Maxxie, kind of make him the character that other situations resolve themself around?
― Matt DC, Monday, 7 April 2008 22:36 (seventeen years ago)
Agree with what most people are saying - Bristol bit pretty bloody good, Chris' death devastating. It was baffling how anyone thought the NY section was a good idea - did they just have a big spare chunk of budget lying around or what? Adam was a tit. I know realism isn't the programme's strong point, but it's really stretching it to expect us to believe Cassie had the wherewithall or the means to just hop on a transatlantic flight.
― chap, Monday, 7 April 2008 23:21 (seventeen years ago)
Well we don't really know anything about her parents, or what they do.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 16:07 (seventeen years ago)
I think her parents were hippy artists who has sex all the time and were neglecting Cassie and her baby brother/sister. One of them was Neil Morrissey.
I didn't really get the NY thing, at first I thought it was Cassie retreating to some fantasy where she's in another country and has a nice fuzzy American bloke looking after her and not wanting sex, but maybe not.
― limón, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 20:10 (seventeen years ago)
'ere us go.
"Rockin' With The Toes", blimey, not heard that in yonks. Saw them play live once. Disappointing.
― William Bloody Swygart, Monday, 14 April 2008 21:04 (seventeen years ago)
Ad for "The Inbetweeners". It looks, it is fair to say, terrible.
― William Bloody Swygart, Monday, 14 April 2008 21:11 (seventeen years ago)
I feel weirdly empty.
― William Bloody Swygart, Monday, 14 April 2008 22:14 (seventeen years ago)
Last shot=lame
― G00blar, Monday, 14 April 2008 22:39 (seventeen years ago)
Chris' funeral was pure cheese, though Mark Heap was a pleasure as always. Tony and Sid's farewell got me a bit choked up. And yeah, the last shot was totally 'please please watch the next series, look, it's got Effie in!'.
― chap, Tuesday, 15 April 2008 00:40 (seventeen years ago)
despite how shit it was, i'll miss it.
― Gukbe, Wednesday, 16 April 2008 06:06 (seventeen years ago)
there's no pleasing some people. Okay quite a lot of the last part of this season dragged, there were a few continuity problems and the odd bit of insincerity, but this is still the best thing on UK telly in ages bar, well, not a lot.
― the next grozart, Wednesday, 16 April 2008 07:19 (seventeen years ago)
The scene when the penny dropped with Anwar that he was the one being left behind was kind of poignant. Kind of glad they didn't go for a Sid and Cassie reunion at the end. The coffin stealing scenes were bollocks but fun nonetheless.
So Effy is definitely in the next series then?
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 16 April 2008 08:37 (seventeen years ago)
The scene when the penny dropped with Anwar that he was the one being left behind was kind of poignant
Also the shot of him opening his marks > the shot of Jal waking up set to Elliott Smith.
― G00blar, Wednesday, 16 April 2008 09:46 (seventeen years ago)
Where '>' means 'into'.
I almost expected Sid and Tony to make out a few times.
― Will M., Wednesday, 16 April 2008 16:11 (seventeen years ago)
ive asked this before but... anyone know of a hulu type joint that has these episodes available to stream? if not, what's the best torrent place to get them?
― the usic man from the hilarious ilx message boards (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 10:47 (seventeen years ago)
wow they rescreened an episode from s2 on e4 last night
― Manchego Bay (G00blar), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 10:59 (seventeen years ago)
but no, don't know about torrents; I'd just do rapidshare searches and the like
― Manchego Bay (G00blar), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 11:00 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.veoh.com/search.html?type=v&searchId=948135922546456804&search=skins
― Seannadams Molloy (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 11:01 (seventeen years ago)
http://i33.tinypic.com/2ntg47q.jpg
― robschneiderMk2 (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 11:04 (seventeen years ago)
Effy and friends are coming to fuck shit up!
Series 3 trailer
― lindseykai, Monday, 5 January 2009 17:18 (sixteen years ago)
www.myspace.com/skinseffy
Unnecessary imo
― The boy with the Arab money (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Thursday, 15 January 2009 10:10 (sixteen years ago)
I’m Effy. It’s a shit name but it’s short for Elizabeth which is even worse. I live with my Mum and Dad. My brother used to live here too but now he’s gone. On the day he left he gave me his duvet cover, half a bottle of Peach Schnapps, and his bedroom. Well, he doesn’t need it any more does he? So now it’s my kingdom. I drank the Schnapps and gave the duvet to Oxfam.
this is bush.
was it a duvet or a duvet cover?
― Eddie Funnie (special guest stars mark bronson), Thursday, 15 January 2009 10:13 (sixteen years ago)
She gave her duvet to Oxfam but kept his cover?
― The boy with the Arab money (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Thursday, 15 January 2009 10:14 (sixteen years ago)
she just doesn't give a fuck.
― Eddie Funnie (special guest stars mark bronson), Thursday, 15 January 2009 10:14 (sixteen years ago)
Okay. So. Paris Hilton isn't an It Girl. Clara Bow was an It Girl. She was one of the biggest silent film stars ever. The Brooklyn Bonfire. I think we're really similar. She's a brunette. I'm a brunette. Her Dad was mentally impaired. My Dad is mentally impaired. She was really good at poker. I'm really good at poker. She married a cowboy. I don't think I'm getting married but if I did it would probably be to a cowboy.
Does this mean this "Effy" will be getting gangraped by a touring NFL team next season?
― The boy with the Arab money (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Thursday, 15 January 2009 10:16 (sixteen years ago)
Plus CGI John Wayne.
― the Enrique who acts like some kind of good taste gestapo (Raw Patrick), Thursday, 15 January 2009 10:21 (sixteen years ago)
Get off your horse and drink your milk (semen!)
― The boy with the Arab money (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Thursday, 15 January 2009 10:21 (sixteen years ago)
No, you don't understand! "The starting line-up of the 1927 University of Southern California American Football Team" is the name of my dog!
― The boy with the Arab money (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Thursday, 15 January 2009 10:22 (sixteen years ago)
this show can suck it
― Timezilla vs Mechadistance (blueski), Thursday, 15 January 2009 12:36 (sixteen years ago)
the ad has a bunch of indie kids causing a ruckus and punching people out in a chavvy bar. sheah right.
― Michael B, Thursday, 15 January 2009 12:40 (sixteen years ago)
This show is great, even when it's a bit crap. When it's good, it's genuinely affecting.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 15 January 2009 12:43 (sixteen years ago)
BAAAAAAACK
― William Bloody Swygart, Thursday, 22 January 2009 22:00 (sixteen years ago)
NOWWWWWWW
(on E4)
(or an hour from now on E4+1)
Don't know if I can make it through the full hour.
― Gukbe, Thursday, 22 January 2009 22:26 (sixteen years ago)
In a way, I sort of liked it. Some of the characters look fairly interesting, no plots have really been established as such, not an awful lot happened, the stuff with the teachers was overlong and rubbish (albeit that Ardal O'Hanlon was pretty good), and the episode ended with two of the characters having sex to the Klaxons.
It's not gonna change anyone's mind on it, put it that way.
― William Bloody Swygart, Thursday, 22 January 2009 23:08 (sixteen years ago)
Identical twins. How dare they do that to me. Don't they know I'm nearly 30?
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 January 2009 23:09 (sixteen years ago)
pretty awful, but the 'coming on...' bit during the credits seemed okay. reckon autistic/asbergers/whatever guy might be this year's cassie (i.e. annoying right out the gate but a proper episode devoted to him might swing it round)
― Gukbe, Thursday, 22 January 2009 23:15 (sixteen years ago)
It's definitely still Skins. Telling that the most most likable kid so far (Cook) seems to be pretty much identical to Chris. Ardal O'Hanlon was easily the best thing in it.
― chap, Thursday, 22 January 2009 23:15 (sixteen years ago)
Scene-setting episode really, it only gets good once we get inside the characters' heads, which presumably starts next week.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 January 2009 23:38 (sixteen years ago)
Favourite bit was probably Pandora skipping off down the corridor to the strains of The Singing Nun.
― William Bloody Swygart, Friday, 23 January 2009 00:14 (sixteen years ago)
Just caught this. Am surprised that I like Cook as much as I do, from the previews I thought I would hate him. Effy is lucky she is gorg, otherwise her character would be boring as shit. She does best when she acts with her eyes.
Naomi is fly.
JJ needs to shut up.
― youcangoyourownway, Saturday, 24 January 2009 04:40 (sixteen years ago)
I'm hoping you're right. I thought the writing was shit, way worse than I remember from last season (but I could be misremembering), but the characters have potential, so we'll see.
― Safe Boating is No Accident (G00blar), Tuesday, 27 January 2009 00:11 (sixteen years ago)
Quite enjoyed the second one. I think Cook is a well thought-out character, he's got recognisable elements of various charismatically self-destructive people I've known. I'm not really feeling anyone else yet though, particularly not JJ who seems poorly played so far.
― chap, Wednesday, 4 February 2009 00:41 (sixteen years ago)
The first half of that second episode had me a bit bored, felt like they'd done it all before, but then when he went all psycho it got very dark very quickly. It sort of assuaged my concerns that they were just going for like-for-like replacements for most of the S1 cast.
― Holy Suffering Gobi Desert Clit Nun (Matt DC), Wednesday, 4 February 2009 09:36 (sixteen years ago)
even the ads make the new kids seem like theyve a quarter of the charisma of the old cast
― straightola, Wednesday, 4 February 2009 10:29 (sixteen years ago)
Thing is that Effy's got to be the lead role, sort of, as she's the only link to previous seasons, and though she's attractive, she just seems so... pointless. There's no rhyme or reason to her nihilism / self-indulgence. Chris, for instance, seemed much more well-rounded. I know it's early days.
Also, fucking hate Mackenzie Crook, and hate him too much for the visual of him being beaten up to make his presence worthwhile, especially as trailers have made it clear he'll be a major player in this series. Just cos of his fucking accent. Hearing him interviewed when he played that underground train driver in the suicide film made it abundantly clear that he's a fucking moron.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 4 February 2009 10:34 (sixteen years ago)
i think the JJ character isn't too far off the aspie stereotype really.
― the next grozart, Wednesday, 4 February 2009 10:54 (sixteen years ago)
Everyone looked like a lazy stereotype by this stage of the first season as well though, except perhaps Cassie.
― Holy Suffering Gobi Desert Clit Nun (Matt DC), Wednesday, 4 February 2009 10:57 (sixteen years ago)
nick's right about effy. never liked her as a character and always saw her as pointless.
― the next grozart, Wednesday, 4 February 2009 11:29 (sixteen years ago)
She was best in S1 when she didn't talk.
― chap, Wednesday, 4 February 2009 11:41 (sixteen years ago)
then when he went all psycho it got very dark very quickly. It sort of assuaged my concerns that they were just going for like-for-like replacements for most of the S1 cast.
So in episode 3 of series 1, threatening gangster dude is overcome when he gets bundled into the back of a car by Jal's dad and is never seen again.
And in episode 3 of series 3, different threatening gangster dude is overcome after being humiliated in a chili-eating contest, which, minus the profanity, could have basically been lifted from The Beano.
Maureen Lipman's wall of chainsaws was quite fun, but aside from that...
― William Bloody Swygart, Thursday, 5 February 2009 23:19 (sixteen years ago)
Should have had an actual fight instead of a chilli-eating contest.
― Holy Suffering Gobi Desert Clit Nun (Matt DC), Thursday, 5 February 2009 23:20 (sixteen years ago)
I thought the first half, with Thomas trying to find his feet, was lovely. Then it descended into cartoon silliness. I hope Thomas comes back - he's a nice character, and the kid playing him did a good job.
― chap, Friday, 6 February 2009 12:54 (sixteen years ago)
OK, very good episode, that one. Apart from the godawful Philip Larkin bit.
― William Bloody Swygart, Friday, 13 February 2009 02:33 (sixteen years ago)
Aye, enjoyed last night's quite a lot. Can see glimmers of Effie's wanton indulgent cockness coming down. Looking forward to a JJ episode just to see how much they can actually flesh him out into something other than a caricature.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 13 February 2009 07:56 (sixteen years ago)
I didn't like that one, I keep comparing the fleshing out of the characters unfavourably to how they did it in season one. So... Pandora is upset because her boyfriend has left and, that's it? It's hardly what they did with Cassie or Chris.
There's some good JJ stuff to come I think - the best scene was the bit with Freddie rescuing him from the party as he was freaking out. He and Naomi are the best characters by some distance.
― Maximo Park Ji-Sung (Matt DC), Friday, 13 February 2009 09:10 (sixteen years ago)
JJ really reminds me of someone I know, almost scarily so.
I like the fact in this one Panda and JJ reflect a less streetwise type of character than the previous cast. Pandora especially is still a little girl compared to her mates and doesn't really show an interest in dressing sexily or even indulging in drink/drugs in the same way. It's a lot more realistic therefore, because not everyone in 6th form was some sort of topshop wearing, ecstasy-taking electrodribbler at the end of the day.
― the next grozart, Friday, 13 February 2009 13:14 (sixteen years ago)
Naomi hasn't really done anything yet has she Matt?
Whoa. I appreciate pretty much all of the characters (save Freddie) after this past episode. Damn, Pandora.
Naomi is still my favorite.
― youcangoyourownway, Friday, 13 February 2009 23:46 (sixteen years ago)
Not great, but an improvement upon the gangster storyline at least. Mostly watching this for the eventual JJ episode, as (and I'm sure I mentioned upthread) the only thing that has brought me back was that season preview featuring (what I assume was) JJ's social organizing wall chart.
― Gukbe, Sunday, 15 February 2009 05:25 (sixteen years ago)
Lost track of this halfway through series 2 and never got back into it. Caught the last few minutes this week and, though I didn't know what the hell was going on, the use of low's breaker was v well done. The music in this show (when not indie yoof standards) seems to be a+
I'd forgotten I really loved this show sometimes (like Sid and Tony at gig after Capaldi kicked the bucket - heartbreaking) Should I play catch up and start watching again?
― sktsh, Sunday, 15 February 2009 12:29 (sixteen years ago)
worth finishing up the second series. vote still not in on these new kids.
― Gukbe, Sunday, 15 February 2009 15:34 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah if you loved the Sid and Tony scene I'd really recommend watching the rest of series two - there are some even more heatbreaking moments in there. And if you liked the Breaker bit, wait til you see how they use another Low song. Might be a bit weird seeing it again now that one of the original kids is an proper internationally famous celebrity.
― Maximo Park Ji-Sung (Matt DC), Sunday, 15 February 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)
I'm persuaded - will resume series 2. Annoyingly my sister sms-spoilered someone dying towards the end, which I imagine is amongst the heartbreak to which you allude..
(Is there a thread for incongruous music on teen fluff? Not so much skins which I actually like, but this reminded me of seeing an episode of hollyoaks fading out to I see a Darkness.)
― sktsh, Sunday, 15 February 2009 22:46 (sixteen years ago)
Enjoyable episode, yeah. Though the subplot about Pandora's mum actually being a sex person (to paraphrase Alan Partridge) seemed a bit obvious and didn't really pay off. Getting good chuckles from the stupid footballer boyfriend of whichever twin it is.
― chap, Monday, 16 February 2009 15:50 (sixteen years ago)
apparently Two of the girls snog to the sounds of Katy Perry
how do they come up with this stuff??!
― O Supermanchiros (blueski), Wednesday, 18 February 2009 14:55 (sixteen years ago)
Ah, that was just in the preview clip - by the time the show aired, it had been changed to Lily Allen instead.
I am not completely sure why.
― William Bloody Swygart, Wednesday, 18 February 2009 15:07 (sixteen years ago)
Eww, incest.
― Maximo Park Ji-Sung (Matt DC), Thursday, 19 February 2009 23:17 (sixteen years ago)
^Please explain
― youcangoyourownway, Thursday, 19 February 2009 23:18 (sixteen years ago)
It wasn't exactly explicit, but it was pretty heavily-handedly implied that Freddy had fucked (or at the very least wanted to fuck) his sister. Possibly the bit when he was sitting down in English discussing Hamlet with the word INCEST posted on a wall above him might have been a giveaway, I don't know.
Still, best episode yet. I've kind of only just got that the reason the first season seemed to work immediately was because the kids were all friends beforehand, whereas this is a new group coming together, except the three central boys who sort of hate each other. The Freddy vs Cook rivalry is interesting especially because it has JJ as this vulnerable influence in the middle of it. The girls don't quite seem to relate to the story properly yet though, except Effy.
― Maximo Park Ji-Sung (Matt DC), Thursday, 19 February 2009 23:22 (sixteen years ago)
JJ is definitely my favourite character so far, and Cooky's affection for him is really touching - the fire breathing thing, the "Naomi backwards is I Moan" thing - it's not just carrying along a stooge, a sidekick; he really loves him. I find the dynamic of the three boys' relationship really compelling, actually; Cooky kissing Freddie rather than hitting him, the "'ave a tickle" call to the girl walking past JJ. It's taken a little while to get going, but I'm really enjoying it now.
As a vaguely related aside; does anyone else find themselves nearly rupturing recently-repaired hernias at The Inbetweeners? I've seen the whole series before, but it still makes me laugh like a drain.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 19 February 2009 23:39 (sixteen years ago)
Blimey, Effie's a flaky bitch isn't she? Shouldn't be surprising being Tony's sister. But I wonder if she's as calculating as her brother or just hopelessly self-obsessed and directionless.
I'm developing quite a crush on Naomi.
― chap, Friday, 20 February 2009 17:09 (sixteen years ago)
OTM. I think I might be in love with Naomi.
― David Bentley: Rhythm Ace (Matt DC), Saturday, 21 February 2009 13:03 (sixteen years ago)
Damn good episode.
― youcangoyourownway, Friday, 27 February 2009 02:01 (sixteen years ago)
Also, fuck an Effy - Naomi is the real beaut in this show.
― youcangoyourownway, Friday, 27 February 2009 02:03 (sixteen years ago)
finally. hope JJ's next week continues the trend.
― Gukbe, Friday, 27 February 2009 03:41 (sixteen years ago)
also: grouper!
― Gukbe, Friday, 27 February 2009 03:43 (sixteen years ago)
I really enjoyed last night's, and it made Emma cry too.
I think Skins at its best uses hyper-real scenarios and outside characters to emphasise really quite realistic emotional situations;beautiful cast, college riots, ridiculous teachers, cliched parents, etc etc, but really quite common adolescent insecurities; loneliness, family troubles, etc etc. No, I don't imagine many Bristolian teenagers go to underground raves accessed via manhole covers, or spend autumn nights lezzing up by picturesque lakes, or beat up gangsters...
I tell you what as well; this cast is definitely working, because I'm not thinking about the old cast at all. And none of them are as dislikable as Tony Stonem.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 27 February 2009 10:19 (sixteen years ago)
i thought that episode was rubbish apart from a couple of titilating scenes.
― the next grozart, Friday, 27 February 2009 10:28 (sixteen years ago)
i think JJ's will be awesomahj next week though.
― the next grozart, Friday, 27 February 2009 10:30 (sixteen years ago)
I thought they played the Naomi slowly coming to terms with the fact she's a lesbian thing very well actually, the way she kept freaking out and running away from Emily again and again.
― David Bentley: Rhythm Ace (Matt DC), Friday, 27 February 2009 11:13 (sixteen years ago)
Is she a lesbian, though? Or is she just a lonely, confused adolescent without a stable masculine influence in her life and who therefore doesn't feel comfortable with boys, especially ones her own age, at the moment? I thought her attraction to Emily was more to do with companionship than teenage lust.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 27 February 2009 11:18 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, nick otm. i guess i was just a bit disappointed by this one because you didn't learn much more about the characters. Emily fancies Naomi, and the jury's still out on the latter. Cookie's still a cock. Teachers are still ridiculous. i still enjoyed the episode, but this is the first one of this series i wasn't so hot on.
― the next grozart, Friday, 27 February 2009 12:09 (sixteen years ago)
that said, this series is equally as good as the first batch. in fact i think i relate more to some of these characters (or at least my past self does) than tony et al.
― the next grozart, Friday, 27 February 2009 12:10 (sixteen years ago)
You're an autistic lesbian with a severe alcohol problem who wants to fuck their sister?
― David Bentley: Rhythm Ace (Matt DC), Friday, 27 February 2009 12:19 (sixteen years ago)
what's all this fucking the sister thing about Matt? i watched that episode again and i couldn't work out where you were getting this from.
― the next grozart, Friday, 27 February 2009 12:21 (sixteen years ago)
Dude he freaked out and pulled her skirt down, at the age of what 16 or 17? And he got *really* pissed off when he found out Cookie had slept with her. And he was stroking her hair in a creepy way. And he was sitting there in class with the word INCEST written on the wall right behind him.
It was laid on pretty thick.
― David Bentley: Rhythm Ace (Matt DC), Friday, 27 February 2009 12:30 (sixteen years ago)
With hindsight, I think Matt's right, although I imagine that the writers are going to see those facts as red herrings rather than plot indicators. Surely they wouldn't touch incest so soon after Holyoaks - there's no way out of it apart from killing off a cast member.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 27 February 2009 13:09 (sixteen years ago)
I enjoyed that one a lot, Naomi's certainly one of the more interesting characters (not to mention the hottest). Good turn from Dougal.
Two points:1. Somebody's seen Election.2. Seemed a bit of a cheat to leave Katie out of the episode altogether, though I can see why they did; her reactions to all that was going on may have been a narrative thread too many.
― chap, Friday, 27 February 2009 13:35 (sixteen years ago)
I'm assuming they're saving that for the Katie & Emily episode, whenever that happens.
― David Bentley: Rhythm Ace (Matt DC), Friday, 27 February 2009 13:37 (sixteen years ago)
Re; Cook - he IS a cunt, yes, a mouthy, violent, lustful, alcoholic cunt at that, too; but there's just enough glimpses of a decent bloke underneath for him not to be a total caricature or cliche.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 27 February 2009 13:40 (sixteen years ago)
Effie's really starting to piss me off with with her smouldering and mysterious sideways glances.
― chap, Friday, 27 February 2009 13:41 (sixteen years ago)
And yes, Cook is an increasingly well-drawn and well-played character.
Effie reminds me of a girl I knew at school, who was both very sweet and very smart, nice family (that didn't split up); seemingly a very nice girl set on a nice course to go through A Levels and to uni and a nice job / family blah blah etc but who went totally off the rails with sex and drugs and drink at about 17-19 for no apparent traumatic reason. I remember her telling me that she'd slept with two men in one day once, and her being really excited about it, like it was an achievement, but there being a real sense of desperation and sadness to it, too.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 27 February 2009 13:53 (sixteen years ago)
I "get" Cook, if that makes any sense. He's very well-played. Freddy, on the other hand, makes no sense at all.
― youcangoyourownway, Friday, 27 February 2009 13:54 (sixteen years ago)
Aspects of Cook remind me of a couple of people, one of whom now pulls in £50k a year in a very high-powered IT job, despite never finishing his degree (cos he was too busy drinking and fighting!).
Freddie... his episode didn't flesh him out enough, and he's been very peripheral in the other episodes so far, too. I want to like him, and I think there's a degree of sense there in the characterisation, but just. not. quite. enough.
Katie is the only one so far who makes no sense to me, but she's only been peripheral. Panda remains amusing and sweet peripheral, too. Hoping for big things from the JJ episode.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 27 February 2009 13:57 (sixteen years ago)
Freddie just comes across as a vacuous, moany good-looking guy TBH.
― chap, Friday, 27 February 2009 14:25 (sixteen years ago)
I got incest vibes from Freddy too. He shouted at Cook after he found out he'd slept with her, which seems normal and protective, but then he went and did the same to her as if she'd betrayed him in some way aswell. It was more like he was finding out about his best mate sleeping with his girlfriend than with his sister. Having your sister fancy your mates at that age isn't that odd really. Unless it was just a bit of a clumsy way of building up the "Freddie feels constantly betrayed by Cook" stuff, which I can see going somewhere.
― ‽, Friday, 27 February 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)
Freddie's mum has died in the recent past,prior to the series beginning... Effie's flaking out on him by running off and fucking Cook at any given opportunity, even though Cook (at present) offers her no emotional support... I think Freddie's got panic issues with the idea of women leaving him for nothingness, whether that be death or vacuous physical romps with Cook. As such he feels inferior and betrayed and isolated. Perhaps.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 27 February 2009 15:44 (sixteen years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, February 2, 2007 10:21 AM (2 years ago)
Fail.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 27 February 2009 16:30 (sixteen years ago)
i empathised/identified with freddy for a while but when bob fossil asked "how's being an angsty little prick working out for ya?" i think he hit the nail on the head. there's only so much party-pooping he can do, although everyone gets fed up of their best friend from time to time. glimmers of the tony/sid relationship going on here. cook is a brilliant character. his nasty little vampire grin makes me want to smash his head in.
― the next grozart, Friday, 27 February 2009 18:50 (sixteen years ago)
i'm still not bought on the incest thing, although you do have a point matt... we'll have to see where that one goes.
― the next grozart, Friday, 27 February 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)
one thing that kind of bugs me is that now Thomas is enrolled at their school when he was previously the janitor. I know his mum is there now and he moved back to the UK and I guess is somehow a proper resident (???) now, but it was much more interesting before. Guess that's nitpicking, but I wish they would have run with that.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Friday, 27 February 2009 19:02 (sixteen years ago)
yeah, that was a bit wtf..
― the next grozart, Friday, 27 February 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)
Wow. Best Skins ever. That made me cry, like, twice. Awesome.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 6 March 2009 00:04 (sixteen years ago)
That shot of JJ's mum at the end had the kind of subtlety you forget Skins is allowed to do sometimes. She was the one they'd all forgotten. Her mouth flickering into a smile was beautiful.
Please not to let Emily's lesbianings be this series' equivalent of Tony's brain damage tho.
― William Bloody Swygart, Friday, 6 March 2009 00:32 (sixteen years ago)
Think I might have preferred it to Red Riding, all told. The lollipop scene was marvellous, too.
― William Bloody Swygart, Friday, 6 March 2009 00:40 (sixteen years ago)
Don't really watch tv but I saw this and it was good.
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Friday, 6 March 2009 00:41 (sixteen years ago)
Gah, just saw this. Debussy + JJ's mom = TEARS.
― youcangoyourownway, Friday, 6 March 2009 03:27 (sixteen years ago)
holy fuckballs that was good.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Friday, 6 March 2009 04:04 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, Red Riding was good, but I feel, with the ending, it bottled it and went for unfeasible resolutions rather than realism; which I thought was the point?
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 6 March 2009 07:05 (sixteen years ago)
Yes the shot of JJ's mother at the end, looking at him laughing with Emily, with tears welling up and that Debussy piece playing in the background, was incredibly moving. This is partly because she'd hardly been seen at all beforehand - it's very rare in Skins to see a parent who isn't a ridiculous overbearing comedy caricature of a fuck-up and it was pretty refreshing really.
Emily is lovely. I am so over Naomi.
― Hreidarsson The Storm (Matt DC), Friday, 6 March 2009 09:34 (sixteen years ago)
Having been coerced into watching last week's by my flatmate and been utterly captivated by riverbank frolicking I am now a card-carrying convert to this.
Matt DC mega otm. Although I'm not quite over Naomi.
― speaking as a mwahahahaha (Upt0eleven), Friday, 6 March 2009 10:07 (sixteen years ago)
Watched it again. Welled up three times. Awesome episode.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 6 March 2009 18:46 (sixteen years ago)
echoes of the crystal castles scene from series 2, what with that soundalike band (I think they're called You Love Her Cos She's Dead (yeah I know)). Overall, I thought the episode was okay, but found a few of the comedy aspects of JJ's condition slightly irksome (fainting when he sees some boobs etc). the shrink was really well acted.
― the next grozart, Monday, 9 March 2009 12:42 (sixteen years ago)
Hmm. Dunno about that one.
Freddie's little shake of the head at Effy at the end, the one that said "Woman, you have declined in my estimation" - practically Zoolander, that.
― William Bloody Swygart, Friday, 13 March 2009 02:47 (sixteen years ago)
It was a decent episode, but was always going to feel below par after JJ's. Still think this cast are inherently more... I dunno if likeable is right, but recognisable, to me.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 13 March 2009 07:30 (sixteen years ago)
The mushroom scene with Gang Gang Dance playing was the best bit.
― Hreidarsson The Storm (Matt DC), Friday, 13 March 2009 09:47 (sixteen years ago)
(I think they're called You Love Her Cos She's Dead (yeah I know)
this band are the pits. did visuals at a gig they played at a few months ago and the girls voice gave me a splitting headache
― straightola, Friday, 13 March 2009 10:22 (sixteen years ago)
sticking that band scene in there ruined a great episode for me, to repeat something like that from the first series felt like such a blatant bit of product placement(someones music PR must have been owned a BIG favour). i have now actually warmed to the new generation now though (other than freddy, put a bloody shirt on you iron)
― straightola, Friday, 13 March 2009 10:33 (sixteen years ago)
Agree that this was a bit so-so compared to the previous three or four eps. Also agree that the shrooming scene was the best, they captured the psychedelic experience pretty well.
Does anyone find Effy fit? I think she's a bit funny looking.
― chap, Friday, 13 March 2009 13:12 (sixteen years ago)
funny looking yes as in 'funny this looks like a child'
― straightola, Friday, 13 March 2009 13:28 (sixteen years ago)
Very pleased with them playing the Travelling Band and Susan Cadogan in that ep. Mind you it does frustrate me that whoever's in charge of the music seems to be rifling through my M3 hard drive at will.
― the next grozart, Wednesday, 18 March 2009 11:47 (sixteen years ago)
'k, new favourite episode.
― William Bloody Swygart, Friday, 20 March 2009 00:39 (sixteen years ago)
so effy is the weak link?
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Friday, 20 March 2009 00:42 (sixteen years ago)
I dunno, this episode did not strike me as much as JJ's episode, but whatever. I just cannot stand Katie, she needs to stop hitting people.
― youcangoyourownway, Friday, 20 March 2009 00:59 (sixteen years ago)
No, I think it was that her episode suffered from being a bit dodgily structured. Effy and Freddie are pretty reasonable characters, kids whose self-possession is dragging them down rather a lot. Though to what extent this is intentional on the writers' parts I'm really not sure - see Freddie agreeing with JJ that they weren't getting any this evening in a manner that suggested that this situation was in some way JJ's fault, despite Freddie being the one that told Katie.
― William Bloody Swygart, Friday, 20 March 2009 01:35 (sixteen years ago)
Steve Reich!
― Number None, Friday, 20 March 2009 03:03 (sixteen years ago)
Good episode last night, second favourite of the series so far after JJ's (which I just think was magical, a triumph of television). The whole "I'm not you" bit was emotionally interesting, older twin using younger as some kind of Dorian Grey type device, a hidden aspect of her personality that absorbs all the meekness and insecurity so the older one can be dominatrix bitch with footballer boyf, etc. Agree that Effie's not the weak link, I don't think, nor Freddie; as long, that is, as next week's episode works.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 20 March 2009 10:52 (sixteen years ago)
I didn't really like that one, it felt a bit convoluted.
This series has been pretty good but there hasn't been an episode that even came close to the original Effy and Chris ones in terms of emotional clout.
― Matt DC, Friday, 20 March 2009 10:54 (sixteen years ago)
^^ Totally agreed Matt. The first series had episodes and scenes that let me thinking for days: The entire Effy episode, the end of Chris' episode, the scene where Cassie showed Sid how she gets away with not eating at lunch (the scene that got me hooked to the first series).....With the exception of JJ's episode and its ending I have not gotten that from this series. I still like it though, its better than any teen show in America, that's for sure.
― youcangoyourownway, Friday, 20 March 2009 11:55 (sixteen years ago)
So, has Skins taken over from Hollyoakes in the "OMG, My parents will be watching it oops, but then again it's my big chance to be the next "get him/her for the lead in my next movie" window/opportunity" for young actors?
― Mark G, Friday, 20 March 2009 11:58 (sixteen years ago)
the difference is though, that hollyoaks is unmitigated shit.
i prefer this bunch just slightly over the previous ones, but no episode will beat the sid's dead dad one.
― the next grozart, Friday, 20 March 2009 12:17 (sixteen years ago)
The difference is that no Hollyoaks actor has ever gone onto anything much bigger than Two Pints Of Lager And A Packet Of Crisps whereas Skins has already spawned one lead in a internationally massive Oscar-winning film.
― Matt DC, Friday, 20 March 2009 12:18 (sixteen years ago)
That's sort of what I mean:
"Hollyoaks! Next stop Corrie"
as opposed to "Skins! Next stop Hollywood!"
― Mark G, Friday, 20 March 2009 13:12 (sixteen years ago)
This is such a consistently great and funny show. Of course, as other have pointed out, this series hasn't reached the heights of the second series, but it's still one of the best shows around, and most def the best teen drama I've seen. What else could come close?
The sad thing is that I think the show is promoted the complete wrong way. Most people who don't watch it just assume that the show is about "cool teenagers who drink and do drugs" and it's all clichés and stuff, and that's obvioulsy down to the promotion of the show. I wish more people would give this show a chance.
― Lovelace, Saturday, 21 March 2009 01:14 (sixteen years ago)
Naomi -> Effy
― Lovelace, Saturday, 21 March 2009 01:15 (sixteen years ago)
Lovelace OTM. I only came around to Skins quite recently and i remember being totally turned off by the marketing of the first series.
― Number None, Sunday, 22 March 2009 01:19 (sixteen years ago)
So, season finale last night.
Em hadn't seen last weeks, so downloaded and watched it while I listened to SFA in the next room before we watched last night's episode. She said she cried "all the way through" last week's episode. I cried loads during JJ's episode.
Neither of us cried at the finale, though.
I thought Super Hans was a great piece of casting, and there were several really poignant moments between him and Cook, where you could see Cook... nearly giving in to baser instincts, to genetic compulsion, to "blood is the most important thing". There were a couple of glances of pure admiration from Cook at Super Hans that really terrified me; "why are you in awe of this man? I know he's your dad but can you not see?" JJ's "I'm not better than your dad. You are" line summed it up nicely.
The problem with last night's episode, though, was the problem with the whole season. I just don't really care about Freddie and Effie. As Em said of Effie; "your pretty, your popular, get the fuck over it". She's spent 3 seasons now being a self-obsessed, wantonly destructive minx, and I'm seeing precious little personality behind that. Freddie's obviously only been around this season, and has his mother's death as some kind of emotional context, but I find him pretty absent as a character; he's just a dull stoner, like pretty much every other dull stoner I've ever meant. JJ, as usual, nails it when he says it's "just boring". Freddie & Effie's will-they-wont-they relationship seems to be wanted, by the producers, to be the spur of the whole season, but it's relying purely on the fact that they're (read in a Zoolander voice) really, really, really, really goodlooking, rather than compelling as characters.
Wheres I think Cook's near descent into hell, and the Naomi / Emily / Katie "love triangle" has been far more moving and compelling. Oh, and just everything JJ does. He's awesome.
So, a good episode, but not a patch on the season 1 or 2 finale, and nowhere near the peak of this season.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 27 March 2009 10:32 (sixteen years ago)
Otm.
Effie seems to have been poorly written but she at least seems like a character they could do something with. I'm ready and raring to sympathise with her (probably is just cuz she's nice to look at, but I've convinced myself there's more to it than that), just give me a fuckin' reason to do so. Flashbacks to an abusive childhood or something? I dunno.
Finale left me very very meh. "So what do we do now?" Not sure i'm that bothered tbh.
― N1ck (Upt0eleven), Friday, 27 March 2009 10:49 (sixteen years ago)
You're not really supposed to care that much about Freddie and Effy, it's mostly about the way their relationship impacts upon Cook I think. You can tell because he got virtually all the best bits in yesterday's episode.
Superhans = inspired bit of casting. Would have liked to see the other half of the cast though, it felt like they got relegated to second tier a bit.
― Matt DC, Friday, 27 March 2009 10:52 (sixteen years ago)
I'm wondering if the actual 'key' relationship to the season is that between Freddie, Cook, and JJ; the dissolution of adolescent male friendships?
Of course, the 'real story' or 'actual key' or whatever needn't actually exist, and it could just be an ensemble drama without some kind of overriding ulterior motive or grand narrative to tell...
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 27 March 2009 10:55 (sixteen years ago)
Maybe. I found myself constantly wondering why any of these people were friends with each other but of course, at that age, you have a much smaller pool of people do draw your friendships from. Proximity and convenience tend to be the primary factors, with whether or not you actually like each other largely secondary. They're friends because they always have been and only JJ is starting to question whether or not that's actually enough.
― N1ck (Upt0eleven), Friday, 27 March 2009 11:06 (sixteen years ago)
Aye; I think back to the people I was friends with at that age, and I don't really se any of them anymore, despite thinking, at 15 / 16 / 17, that these were the most important relationships ever. Having met up with a few of them at occasions over the last few years, we have very little in common now.
Incidentally, what does anyone think of The Inbetweeners, which is back for a second season next week? I found the first series to be a great adjunct to Skins; where Skins is far more poignant, it's also a much more unrealistic, dramatic, and aspirational way of looking at teenage life - exciting adventures and sexual discoveries that my own teenage years were pretty lacking in. Whereas The Inbetweeners is, while totally lacking in the characterisation and emotion and so on, much more like what my sixth form was like; boring, embarrassing, etc; and as a result it made me laugh like a drain far more than pretty much any other teen comedy I've seen. It got the awkwardness and impotence of teenage male friendship just right, in a very different way to how Skins did it with Cook, Freddie, and JJ. Not saying it's better, or even as good, just... a nice alternative view.
― Sickamous Mouthall (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 27 March 2009 11:20 (sixteen years ago)
Inbetweeners kicks Skins ass imo
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Saturday, 28 March 2009 00:51 (sixteen years ago)
^^ watched Inbetweeners (first in new series) last night because of this post. Funniest thing I've seen for a long long time. Shall be watching the first series this weekend.
― nate woolls, Friday, 3 April 2009 12:18 (sixteen years ago)
I've seen one episode of Inbetweeners, and found it chucklesome and annoying in equal measures. On the basis of that I can't imagine it being better than Skins, but maybe I should revisit it.
― chap, Friday, 3 April 2009 23:20 (sixteen years ago)
Inbetweeners last night was hilarious. I haven't laughed as much at one programme since I don't know when.
― commons hack spat (Ned Trifle II), Friday, 3 April 2009 23:36 (sixteen years ago)
two of the guys in it are writers on it, I read an interview with them in some supplement magazine, they seemed like guys I'd kick it with.
― Plaxico (I know, right?), Saturday, 4 April 2009 08:28 (sixteen years ago)
Should have their own thread.
― commons hack spat (Ned Trifle II), Saturday, 4 April 2009 09:13 (sixteen years ago)
All 4 leads are played brilliantly.
― nate woolls, Saturday, 4 April 2009 09:13 (sixteen years ago)
And now it has...The Inbetweeners - a UK comedy that is actually funny.
― commons hack spat (Ned Trifle II), Saturday, 4 April 2009 09:15 (sixteen years ago)
just heard phil 'hollyoaks' redmond say this isn't really for 16-24-year-olds but 'twentysomething young men obtaining much hard one for kaya scodelario'. good to know.
― history mayne, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 12:49 (sixteen years ago)
Just got the Season 1 box set and watched the first disc last night (first 4 episodes). I like. Having to try quite hard to resist the urge to use my day off watching the rest.
― krakow, Tuesday, 3 November 2009 11:52 (sixteen years ago)
Redmond is right but it should be 30-something men.
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 3 November 2009 12:41 (sixteen years ago)
No, it applies to us twentysomething young men too. When does the new series start?
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 3 November 2009 12:43 (sixteen years ago)
Aye, I'm only 28. For me these things are a vicarious living of a life I never had because I was an up tight saddo.
― krakow, Tuesday, 3 November 2009 12:44 (sixteen years ago)
Oh and 'was' can be replaced by 'am' quite easily, without removing any truthful emo self-awareness.
― krakow, Tuesday, 3 November 2009 12:46 (sixteen years ago)
never lived the skins teenage life more on account of i had no idea where to get fun drugs. still don't.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 3 November 2009 12:49 (sixteen years ago)
In which case I direct you here - The Inbetweeners - a UK comedy that is actually funny.
― exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 3 November 2009 12:51 (sixteen years ago)
Quick look at wiki tells me the new series is set for January. Also apparently there's going to be a movie and an American version, naturally enough.
― Number None, Tuesday, 3 November 2009 12:55 (sixteen years ago)
Hope Cassie is in the American version, so I can swoon some more.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 3 November 2009 12:57 (sixteen years ago)
8 episodes in 2 days. Just watched Effie's episode, which was pretty dark & different. Interesting.
― krakow, Wednesday, 4 November 2009 00:13 (sixteen years ago)
Scored the complete Series 1-3 boxset, so everything's looking golden for continued Skins action now that I've finished the 1st.
― krakow, Friday, 6 November 2009 19:34 (sixteen years ago)
DVDs have different music from the original airings I think, which is a shame. Probably wouldn't care if you never noticed, but Cassie waking up to Mogwai's "Cody" or Chris taking that viagra to Spiritualized's "Do It All Over Again" were pretty quality moments that I think would be let down without the choons.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Friday, 6 November 2009 20:06 (sixteen years ago)
Just starting Series 3...
― krakow, Tuesday, 17 November 2009 22:14 (sixteen years ago)
Surprisingly really liking Series 3. I was sceptical before hand with the character change, but 3 episodes in and I'm converted.
― krakow, Thursday, 19 November 2009 01:12 (sixteen years ago)
Cook is a great character, the kid who plays him excellent. Can't stand Effie, though - maybe she's due a Tony-like comeuppance in S4.
― I am flesh and blood. You are software and circuitry. (chap), Thursday, 19 November 2009 01:28 (sixteen years ago)
One last episode left for me tonight... I'm actually excited.
― krakow, Sunday, 22 November 2009 11:36 (sixteen years ago)
There's trailers and stuff for the new series up on the E4 website now
― Number None, Monday, 11 January 2010 23:09 (fifteen years ago)
Anticipation mounts...
― krakow, Monday, 11 January 2010 23:22 (fifteen years ago)
Leon Small - Leon, a boxer, is described as "Sexy and effortlessly cool [with] a short fuse and a lack of respect for those in authority." His mother died when he was a child and he was left in charge of his alcoholic father.
Arthur "Fatboy" Chubb - Fatboy is described as having "invented all manner of personas since he was seven years old – in an attempt to avoid being his real self. His current and most sustained self-creation is brash wheeler-dealer Fatboy."
Mercy Olubunmi - Mercy lives with her grandmother from whom she is keeping a huge secret. She is described as having "always been a good girl, but when her parents head back to Nigeria she feels abandoned."
Zsa Zsa Carter - Blue-haired Zsa Zsa is described as "Beautiful, funky and an outspoken tomboy. [...] She's very bright, but likes to think she doesn't need help from anyone."
― conrad, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:13 (fifteen years ago)
Arthur "Fatboy" Chubb? I suppose Lardass "Fatboy" Chubb would have been just a tad too much.
― you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:14 (fifteen years ago)
Arthur "Fatboy" Chubb
creative naming there
― Body Butter (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:15 (fifteen years ago)
lol xpost
don't shoot the messenger
― conrad, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:18 (fifteen years ago)
its like they try harder and harder every year to make me hate it and i still keep coming back
― Body Butter (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:21 (fifteen years ago)
Haha, I just love picturing the guys working on the new characters.
"Alight, back to Fatboy. Has anyone been able to come up with a better surname than 'Chubb'? No one? Not one person can think of a slightly less obvious last name? Really? Oh for fuck's sake, I guess 'Chubb' it is."
― you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:22 (fifteen years ago)
yeah it's a bit weak
― conrad, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:25 (fifteen years ago)
Hang on, is it an all new cast again?
― BTW, I'm frightfully middle-class (chap), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:27 (fifteen years ago)
http://blogs.thestage.co.uk/tvtoday/2009-12-11_e_20_cast.jpg
seems like it :S
― conrad, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 01:12 (fifteen years ago)
Nah, it's last years cast with some new ones thrown into the mix
― Number None, Tuesday, 12 January 2010 01:14 (fifteen years ago)
Alot of the press leading up to this has been about how the plotline involving Naomi and the twins was the best thing from last season, and it seems like the producers have realised it. If I was going to hazard a guess why this worked I'd have said it was because they weren't unrealistically self assured / attractive which made the "lead" characters so teeth grindingly annoying.
If they focus the season around the girls, make Thomas a more believable character and introduce some good characters this could be a hell of a season. If it revolves around effie and freddie frowning and staring into space I'll stop watching quick enough.
― Popper, Saturday, 23 January 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)
fatboy might save this show
― conrad, Wednesday, 27 January 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)
Well, it's had Pauline Quirke so far...
― William Bloody Swygart, Thursday, 28 January 2010 22:13 (fifteen years ago)
― you gone float up with it (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 12 January 2010 00:22 (2 weeks ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
It's Poochie all over again.
― brrrrrrrrrrrrrt_stanton (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 28 January 2010 22:14 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, you realise those are characters from EastEnders E20?
― William Bloody Swygart, Thursday, 28 January 2010 22:19 (fifteen years ago)
Not keen on new theme.
― No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Thursday, 28 January 2010 22:36 (fifteen years ago)
Ach, I have no TV and 4OD is nowhere near as handy as iPlayer. I can't wait for this to appear in a few days or weeks... any nefarious sources would be appreciated (via pm if desired, of course).
― krakow, Thursday, 28 January 2010 22:44 (fifteen years ago)
All is good in the world, it's online on 4OD now. Phew.
― krakow, Thursday, 28 January 2010 23:13 (fifteen years ago)
Yes, they put things like Skins and Inbetweeners up right after (or at the same time as?) it airs on TV.
― salsa sharkshavin (salsa shark), Thursday, 28 January 2010 23:14 (fifteen years ago)
:(
― conrad, Thursday, 28 January 2010 23:32 (fifteen years ago)
whatsamatter? You disappointed that Effy came back so early and didn't just stay far far away until the very end of the season, too?
― salsa sharkshavin (salsa shark), Thursday, 28 January 2010 23:48 (fifteen years ago)
no fatboy
― conrad, Friday, 29 January 2010 00:08 (fifteen years ago)
don't watch this prog btw
― conrad, Friday, 29 January 2010 00:09 (fifteen years ago)
Wow, this was a downer. Doesn't look like it'll be lightening up much next week either.
― Number None, Friday, 29 January 2010 00:27 (fifteen years ago)
For an episode where a girl died while off her face on powdered spliff, two teenagers fucked to Ladysmith Black Mambazo (at least, I think it was Ladysmith Black Mambazo), two other teenagers turned out to be dealing drugs, and a deposit for a new three-bed house in Bristol is apparently somewhere in the region of £600... it didn't feel like very much happened, did it?
Although, if I knew how to do animated gifs, I'd do one of Freddie making his "Mate, sort it out, yeah?" face at Thomas.
― William Bloody Swygart, Friday, 29 January 2010 08:45 (fifteen years ago)
I thought this was a very week opener. I was not engaged at all.
Bad move to make it too single-character-centric in the first episode. Would have been much better to have a group oriented episode with plenty more amusing shenanigans.
Disappointed.
― krakow, Sunday, 31 January 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)
*weak
― krakow, Sunday, 31 January 2010 21:45 (fifteen years ago)
This series is a massive downer and not that engaging so far... :-(
― dog latin, Sunday, 7 February 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)
It's always been a bit fraught, but where's the fun???
― dog latin, Sunday, 7 February 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
Plus none of the characters seem to really hang out with each other any more.
I liked Thursday's Emily episode more than any of the other episodes since JJ's one last season.
― salsa sharkshavin (salsa shark), Sunday, 7 February 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)
Fatboy has turned up in actual EastEnders now.
― Space Battle Rothko (Matt DC), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:35 (fifteen years ago)
Ollie from The Thick of It was great in this though.
― Space Battle Rothko (Matt DC), Tuesday, 9 February 2010 22:38 (fifteen years ago)
So it was him... I wasn't sure without the glasses. Yeah, I'm waiting for him to become a proper problem for da kidz.
― dog latin, Tuesday, 9 February 2010 23:19 (fifteen years ago)
BEZ? FUCKING BEZ?
― what kind of present your naked body (Upt0eleven), Sunday, 28 February 2010 00:41 (fifteen years ago)
I cannot watch this new series, it's awful. I don't know if it is worse than the others, or if it was always bad but I just couldn't see it for all the drugged-up teenagers cavorting in their pants.
― krakow, Sunday, 28 February 2010 00:59 (fifteen years ago)
The constant layering of misery upon more misery upon more misery in this series is pretty difficult to bear. Freddie and Katie are the only characters who've come over at all sympathetically so far. Maybe JJ as well but we pretty much never see him.
This set of kids are pretty awful compared to the first lot.
― Matt DC, Monday, 1 March 2010 22:57 (fifteen years ago)
There isn't as much group interaction as there used to be. It's too fragmeneted.
― krakow, Monday, 1 March 2010 23:19 (fifteen years ago)
This JJ episode is the best one so far... Actually probably the only good one.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 4 March 2010 22:22 (fifteen years ago)
Easily the best of this series, certainly, though there was still the odd wobbly moment. Also, "realises their parents are alright after all at the 45-minute mark" is becoming quite the drinking game. Still, that first segment was as good as the show's ever been - arguably one of the funniest bits of telly this year. It really is a lot better when it's not all "Effy refuses to play dodgeball because she is sad". Which, unfortunately, appears to be a reasonable summary of the next episode.
― William Bloody Swygart, Friday, 5 March 2010 09:55 (fifteen years ago)
It really is a lot better when it's not all "Effy refuses to play dodgeball because she is sad". Which, unfortunately, appears to be a reasonable summary of the next episode.
lol wut?
is this series worth watching or should i just watch the jj one?
― There's Always Been A Prance Element To (a hoy hoy), Friday, 5 March 2010 10:01 (fifteen years ago)
I dunno, do you like misery piled on with a trowel and lots of self-indulgent teenagers scowling at one another? If so you'll love the rest of the series - there's already been one suicide and once suicide attempt.
If not, just watch the JJ one. It's pretty self-contained, doesn't relate to much of the rest of the story and is better than all the others.
― Matt DC, Friday, 5 March 2010 10:26 (fifteen years ago)
who died?
― There's Always Been A Prance Element To (a hoy hoy), Friday, 5 March 2010 10:28 (fifteen years ago)
okay I LOVE JJ but that episode's ending was
SO
STUPID
― salsa sharkshavin (salsa shark), Friday, 5 March 2010 10:33 (fifteen years ago)
!!!!!!!!!!!!????????
― salsa sharkshavin (salsa shark), Thursday, 11 March 2010 23:02 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not being funny.
But.
FOR.
FUCK'S.
SAKES.
It was almost not as bad as I assumed it was going to be. I mean, it was looking very ropey at points. But the ending... fuck's sakes.
― William Bloody Swygart, Thursday, 11 March 2010 23:15 (fifteen years ago)
I mean, that was Tony cures his brain tumour by MANNING UP levels of rubbishness.
― William Bloody Swygart, Thursday, 11 March 2010 23:17 (fifteen years ago)
Am I just really bad at reading characters or did they just really badly develop this John Foster guy? I got the feeling he had a bit of a thing for Effy all throughout but I didn't get the feeling that he's more of a nutcase than she is. The ending just didn't fit for me? I don't know. Seems like kind of a shock tactic to make up for an otherwise blah-y episode (and season, in a lot of parts).
― salsa sharkshavin (salsa shark), Thursday, 11 March 2010 23:25 (fifteen years ago)
So, so shit.
― Maraca Son Sistema (Matt DC), Monday, 15 March 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, a lot of TV has been letting me down this year. This, Lost, 24, I'm sure other stuff too. I'm just watching cos I've invested so much time previously at this point.
― No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 06:53 (fifteen years ago)
I was dreading the Effy (surely one of the most annoying TV characters ever) episode after the near-brilliance of the JJ one but that was on another level of awfulness. I assume this is the last we'll be seeing of these lot? I get the feeling from the preview of the final episode that they might be setting up Freddie's sister as the "bridge" to a new set of characters.
― Number None, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 10:25 (fifteen years ago)
This show is seriously running out of steam. I've been following it but the writing just seems phoned-in, the characters have become unrealistic fleshbots with reflex lines and actions. They don't interact with each other any more unless they're treating each other like shit, hopping into bed with each other or downing pills together as if they were Smarties. The kids are angsty and most of them are mentally ill. The parents are flawed and self-absorbed, but the moral of bad-parenting is still being applied with a mallet. They've completely ruined Naomi's character - I just don't see her as being realistic at all any more. Not to mention the serious lack of catharsis you'd normally expect from Skins... There's little light relief from the depressiveness of it all.
On that last point - anyone wonder whether this series is setting out to do exactly what it's done and bring everyone down? Maybe the writers felt that in a recession period people wouldn't want to watch happy-go-lucky kids in new clothes from Topshop, so they ruddied em up and made them angry and depressed? Maybe this is going to lead to a lighter fifth series?
― dog latin, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 10:52 (fifteen years ago)
It's less to do with recession and more to do with plain bad writing. I can't think of many dramas that would suddenly see a major character beaten to death out of the blue by new and totally undeveloped character for the flimsiest of reasons. I think the mental health issues are being dealt with totally hamfistedly and possibly damagingly as well.
― Maraca Son Sistema (Matt DC), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 12:02 (fifteen years ago)
Also take one drink every time an authority figure dances embarassingly to an 80s pop star as soon as they're left alone.
― Maraca Son Sistema (Matt DC), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 12:03 (fifteen years ago)
This season's been short by previous standards too, hasn't it? Only 7 episodes?
I think the writing has gone to pot, true. Too much Max G0g@rty? (Joke.) The JJ episode was almost great but too much Effy, too much 80s dancing by adults, too much of the main characters not being in it; halfway through last season I thought this lot was going to be better than the first bunch, but that feeling has gone now.
― No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)
This show is seriously running out of steam. I've been following it but the writing just seems phoned-in, the characters have become unrealistic fleshbots with reflex lines and actions. They don't interact with each other any more unless they're treating each other like shit, hopping into bed with each other or downing pills together as if they were SmartiesThis sfm!
This series to quote Beyonce has just been an all round 'disastuh'.Imo except for Naomi, Emily, that goddamn Effy (who I used to like when she shut the hell up) and Pandora the characters could be quite likeable and believable (Cook would need some extra work obvs) but they've all turned into raging chumps because the writers have no idea how to develop ideas. The only epi that stood out to me was Cook's, it seemed quite interesting but poorly developed yet again.I miss Misfits.
― orthodox upper mids would generally rather watch ferrets fight (RubyNoir), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
Cook's was okay I suppose, but like many of the other characters he's gone from being a complicated character with enough interesting quirks to a predictable 2D caricature. I did like the kid brother idea though, but as you say, the story needed a lot more work.
This is all starting to feel a bit like what happened with Peep Show in its fourth series. Over-awkward and unrealistic premises, characters turning into caricatures, depressive mood-wise, lacking in real fun. It's why I'm hoping S5 bounces back a bit brighter.
(what does sfm stand for?)
― dog latin, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
There's no way this lot are better than the first set of kids. They were despite everything a lot more believable - this set of kids just don't seem like a believable friendship group.
― Maraca Son Sistema (Matt DC), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 16:41 (fifteen years ago)
Also the first lot succeeded because they only had one Cassie and one Chris, now seemingly everyone is a combination of both.
― Maraca Son Sistema (Matt DC), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
― dog latin, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)
SFM=so fucking much.I do think tho that if we are worried that this series was godawful, wait till the American version starts up. They've already cast it, it's set in Toronto which apparently the equivalent of Bristol.Peep Show at least is maybe, maybe salvagable. I don't think Skins is at all.
― orthodox upper mids would generally rather watch ferrets fight (RubyNoir), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 16:59 (fifteen years ago)
So lol if it's set in Toronto then it is not the American equivalent....but it is being made by BBC America.
― orthodox upper mids would generally rather watch ferrets fight (RubyNoir), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)
This season is definitely shorter than the others... it doesn't look like they'll be doing a Naomi ep or a Pandora ep, though I'm not sure where they'd be able to go with Pandora. Naomi though, I think she could probably use an episode to redeem herself, and given that the fanbase of this show is largely teenagers who are obSESSED with 'Naomily' (I used to work on the E4 site during the show and there was a LOT of love for Emily/Naomi) I don't think the decision to not give her an episode of her own will fare well with a lot of viewers. I'm a bit annoyed by it, but I'm also kind of glad for this season to wrap up soon. Ultimately I'm more pissed off about Freddie's ending than I am Naomi's lack of episode.
Bring on the Inbetweeners!
also lol Toronto
― salsa sharkshavin (salsa shark), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)
hang on... aren't there 8 episodes this season, same as before?
― dog latin, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 17:07 (fifteen years ago)
don't tell me that Freddie getting beaten up is the last in the series???
― dog latin, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)
no last one is Thursday, which makes 8 for this season (but last one had 10? dont know about the s1/s2 run though)
― salsa sharkshavin (salsa shark), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)
I'd kind of assumed Naomi's episode was a joint episode with Emily's but good god do we really need another episode of self-indulgent sulking and paying a bit of lipservice to the dead girl?
― Maraca Son Sistema (Matt DC), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)
no, def not -- but some closure on what happens with naomi/emily would be good (though maybe they'll cram it into the final ep)
― salsa sharkshavin (salsa shark), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 17:15 (fifteen years ago)
Were the first set a more believable group of characters because many of them were actual real local Bristol kids rather than actors? (At least at the start.)
― No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)
Cook & JJ have been the only good things about this season, and then only in fits and spats.
Agreed^.Self indulgent sulking IS what this series is about tho. I cannot bear anymore of Naomi and Emily and that hideous plotline about the soldier girl which imo still doesn't make a lick of sense. I just felt like the dead girl plot was a way for the writers to be all 'SEE we can write about attractive teen lesbians without resorting to the same old hackneyed storylines and gratuitious sex scenes! Ours will have meaning and layers. Look we killed someone! That is an UNEXPECTED element'
I wonder who will be the next Dev/Nick Holt of this cast career wise.The twins who seem to hate each other irl might do well if they use their twin..ness as a shtick.
― orthodox upper mids would generally rather watch ferrets fight (RubyNoir), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 17:27 (fifteen years ago)
Even JJ's character sometimes overdoes the whole comedy-aspie thing. I do like it, but there's only so many times I can put up with him fainting after glancing at some boobs.
― dog latin, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 17:27 (fifteen years ago)
Which he didn't do at all this series. In fact he was revealed as a champion shagger thanks to Cook's advice.
I think Cook will have a decent post-Skins career. Not sure about any of the others. Effie turned up for 10 seconds in Moon.
― No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 16 March 2010 17:29 (fifteen years ago)
i swear he did do it at some point. oh well.
i think the thing about the dead girl was that i don't care about her at all.
― dog latin, Tuesday, 16 March 2010 17:30 (fifteen years ago)
Well, in some ways the series finale was a big step-up (more character interaction, which has been sorely missing this season, for one), and in others ways it was complete pants. Much like the rest of this season.
Naomi's big heartstrings moment had Em welling up but, while I was moved, I thought it went about 2 steps too far. JJ wasn't in it enough. Freddie's sister could be a possible bridge to next season I guess, although last season I assumed she was older.
Hugo Speer's character still rubbishly underdrawn; if I was being MEGA charitable I might say that was the point, that he's just a cypher for the message they've been sending out for 4 years now; i.e. that Effy's the most lustsome thing ever, and that everyone who meets her falls hopelessly in love with her, from adolescent chumps to middle-aged chumps. Which is an interesting idea when you're about 16 but total bollocks afterwards.
The Cook / Speer showdown at the end was... well, it could have been a lot worse, but I was also left feeling thoroughly let down by it too. Nowhere near the Chris finale of season 2.
Panda spacehopping with the mentals was probably the best moment of the episode.
― No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 19 March 2010 08:19 (fifteen years ago)
I liked when Panda announced she was going to Harvard. It was so farfetched, but compared to some of the other stuff that happened recently it actually seemed feasible, somehow.
I'm pretty sure Freddy's sister is older so I don't think there's a link there they can use for next season.
― salsa sharkshavin (salsa shark), Friday, 19 March 2010 08:33 (fifteen years ago)
is it getting another season?
― he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Friday, 19 March 2010 08:53 (fifteen years ago)
fifth and sixth series already commissioned. I actually thought it ended pretty well, freddie is not going to be missed and his sister should be on screen pretty much all the time.
― niminy-piminy cricket (Upt0eleven), Friday, 19 March 2010 11:16 (fifteen years ago)
Had time to watch the final episode last night. This whole season feels glossed over. It's as though I were watching an adaptation of a relatively complex novel but the producers ran out of time to fill out some of the scenes and had to make heavy cuts. Not only is the writing poor, but the editing is sloppy, the acting wooden, the plot is by the numbers, even the music in this episode was weak. And that ending was so weak, it looked like Cook was about to have a pillow fight with Dr Foster, not deck the shit out of him.
― dog latin, Thursday, 25 March 2010 11:15 (fifteen years ago)
I quite liked the VERY ending, the idea that they stopped the clock just before everyone found out about Freddie. But the whole thing felt like an afterthought, like they hadn't bothered to work out how they were going to tie these characters stories up. The last one made perfect sense (everyone goes off to university and we get that great scene with Anwar suddenly realising all his friends are leaving him behind). This time:
Freddie - dead for no apparent reasonCook - presumably kicks the shit out of Dr Foster and eventually gets banged upThomas and Panda - suddenly get to go to Harvard at five seconds notice because they've magically become really good at things we've never seen them do beforeKatie - doesn't get to do much reallyEffy - well they didn't really bother to write her an endingJJ - gets to have a girlfriend and to look after a baby, that's okay I supposeEmily and Naomi - and then they all lez up on a beach in Goa
― Matt DC, Thursday, 25 March 2010 11:25 (fifteen years ago)
Thomas and Panda - suddenly get to go to Harvard at five seconds notice because they've magically become really good at things we've never seen them do before
This - since when was Thomas brilliant at running (iz it cos 'e iz black, yeah?)? And what is the business he runs? I liked Panda on the spacehopper ("I'm not mental!") and the smoking jogger.
All the emotive scenes have fallen flat for me this season. There hasn't been anything as powerful as the "Sid's Dad" episode.
I'd really lost the strand of what was going on between Naomi and Emily by the end but it looked like they made up, so well, yeah i guess that's good.
― dog latin, Thursday, 25 March 2010 11:47 (fifteen years ago)
Fatboy - continues wheelin and dealin
― conrad, Thursday, 25 March 2010 11:58 (fifteen years ago)
I gave up halfway through S4, not that I wasn't enjoying it at all, but blah. Should I resume?
― rhythm fixated member (chap), Friday, 23 July 2010 12:01 (fifteen years ago)
It gets worse from then on, maybe worth watching just for the WTF factor.
― Matt DC, Friday, 23 July 2010 12:24 (fifteen years ago)
S4 is the biggest drop in quality I've seen in a TV series. Really hope they inject it with a bit of entertainment next series or I'm not watching.
― village idiot (dog latin), Friday, 23 July 2010 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, don't think I'll bother.
― rhythm fixated member (chap), Monday, 26 July 2010 12:53 (fifteen years ago)
― village idiot (dog latin), Friday, 23 July 2010 13:52 (3 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
never seen Entourage then?
― a hoy hoy, Monday, 26 July 2010 15:12 (fifteen years ago)
When did Entourage have quality?
― orakle-krake (Gukbe), Monday, 26 July 2010 16:24 (fifteen years ago)
Just got round to watching the first series of this on DVD. 8 episodes in. Some of the acting's really... inconsistent. Guy who plays Maxxi can be laughable at times, but really sweet and convincing at others. Michelle likewise. Sid and Cassie rule. And Chris. Jal's tutting at everything and everyone is getting a bit tiresome, but she's a cutey so all's forgiven right. Actually felt sorry for Tony in Effy's episode.
― The referee was perfect (Chris), Thursday, 26 August 2010 13:46 (fifteen years ago)
Expect similar mixed feelings for the next couple of series.
― rhythm fixated member (chap), Thursday, 26 August 2010 21:55 (fifteen years ago)
Cassie seems so familiar to me. No idea why, I don't recall ever meeting anyone quite like her.
― The referee was perfect (Chris), Thursday, 26 August 2010 22:02 (fifteen years ago)
I knew loads of girls a bit like Cassie at sixth form and uni.
― rhythm fixated member (chap), Thursday, 26 August 2010 22:05 (fifteen years ago)
You know, pretty, vague, ethereal and kind of fucked up. All over the shop at that age.
― rhythm fixated member (chap), Thursday, 26 August 2010 22:10 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, she seemed a type i met in some form or another quite bit as a teenager. key to the series for me was giving her a real personality in the second episode so she wasn't just the flighty annoying one.
― a cankle of rads (Gukbe), Thursday, 26 August 2010 22:14 (fifteen years ago)
Also it was impressive that the producers picked up on and portrayed that type accurately at all, as it hadn't really been shown on TV before.
― rhythm fixated member (chap), Thursday, 26 August 2010 22:19 (fifteen years ago)
I love Cassie. Totally my kind of girl. The bit where Sid tells/asks (?) her to kiss him again in the cafe in Effy's ep - the way she says "No" and brushes him off is spot on. [obsessing over her every word/]
― The referee was perfect (Chris), Thursday, 26 August 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)
Girls like that tended to like me, though I was way more interested in the cool sultry Jal types, who couldn't give a shit.
― rhythm fixated member (chap), Thursday, 26 August 2010 22:23 (fifteen years ago)
Watched the last ep last night. I guess Tony's still alive because he's on the cover of the Series 2 DVD, but don't tell me just in case that's a clever ploy by the DVD people. Sid and Cassie! So cute. I really liked the closing montage. I wanna be mates with Sid. The Maxxie/Anwar storyline was a bit iffy. Like how long have they been mates? Then he suddenly realises he can't be his friend cos he's gay and his parents wouldn't like it. I still enjoyed it though. Fills me with a horrible sense of... longing, though. Like the last scene where Cassie and Sid are on the bench looking out over the city. I'm a sucker for cities at night and street lights and that feeling of 'potential'. Drives home how utterly dull my time in 6th form was, or how dull I was. Happy days.
― The referee was perfect (Chris), Friday, 27 August 2010 12:51 (fifteen years ago)
USA! USA!
― No Good, Scrunty-Looking, Narf Herder (Gukbe), Thursday, 21 October 2010 23:26 (fifteen years ago)
Bleugh, talk about contrived.
― A brownish area with points (chap), Thursday, 21 October 2010 23:44 (fifteen years ago)
what has america ever done to deserve this
― former moderator, please give generously (DG), Thursday, 21 October 2010 23:46 (fifteen years ago)
Really, there's zero spontaneity or energy to that trailer, which were the things which made the original enjoyable.
― A brownish area with points (chap), Thursday, 21 October 2010 23:53 (fifteen years ago)
What is the US equivalent of Bristol, BTW?
― A brownish area with points (chap), Thursday, 21 October 2010 23:57 (fifteen years ago)
Baltimore, in this case
― No Good, Scrunty-Looking, Narf Herder (Gukbe), Friday, 22 October 2010 00:11 (fifteen years ago)
ha i was just about to post about this
obv this will be 70% pointless since there's no nudity on american cable
― sour posse (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 October 2010 06:28 (fifteen years ago)
wow this looks like the fucking worst
― sour posse (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 October 2010 06:30 (fifteen years ago)
Baltimore? Really?
― Matt DC, Thursday, 28 October 2010 08:51 (fifteen years ago)
on one hand, baltimore, sure, why not. on the other hand, you didn't cast one black kid? really?
― sour posse (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 October 2010 08:55 (fifteen years ago)
ppl have been saying that the first episode was terrible, and you'd think a shot-for-shot remake couldn't be THAT bad, but holy hell was it really that bad
― hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 19:15 (fourteen years ago)
yeah, i turned this on for a bit last night and couldn't handle much more than a couple minutes, so awful
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 19:41 (fourteen years ago)
the main problem is that there's an inherent cynicism in mtv doing this remake, but also the acting is bad, there is no nudity, there's less cursing etc -- this only would've worked on hbo where it would've had necessary freedom and been handled by people that don't suck at scripted shows
― hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 19:45 (fourteen years ago)
Is there as much drug taking?
― Rejoice that you weren't eaten (chap), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 20:12 (fourteen years ago)
shouldn't it be called BLUNTS in america?
― "jobs" (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 20:16 (fourteen years ago)
that, i believe, is allowed -- i didn't watch the whole thing tho so i couldn't give you a straight answer
― hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 20:17 (fourteen years ago)
ha, is that what skins is a reference too? i just thought it was a thing about being naked & what not
I've always thought it's about rizla.
― Rejoice that you weren't eaten (chap), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 20:19 (fourteen years ago)
Probably DOUBLE MEANING, wooo.
deep
― plopson (Aerosol), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 20:21 (fourteen years ago)
this shit sucked.
who plays ws11?
― "jobs" (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 20:22 (fourteen years ago)
also for those that don't know, they turned maxxie's character into a lesbian of course
― hard as a markers (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 20:25 (fourteen years ago)
This mainly just made me want to rewatch the original one. I notice they cut out all references to Cassie being anorexic for some reason, and she seems to be a potential serial killer now.
― Dust, Tuesday, 18 January 2011 21:22 (fourteen years ago)
One Guardian writer's opinion, attempts to contrast portrayal of social class between UK/US versions, somewhat interesting: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jan/19/mtv-skins-us-remake-class
― salsa shark, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:11 (fourteen years ago)
The "class discussion" element of the original series is being kind of over-magnified by the Graun there. There's basically the posh kids and everyone else and the treatment of the former doesn't extend much beyond "lol comedy poshos".
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 January 2011 17:21 (fourteen years ago)
this is really, really terrible
― omar little, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 22:01 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.hipsterrunoff.com/altreport/2011/01/mtvs-skins-considered-child-pornography-loses-advertisers.html
― Jefferson Mansplain (DG), Tuesday, 25 January 2011 22:02 (fourteen years ago)
New UK series with new cast starting soon by the way, if anyone still cares in the slightest.
― Rejoice that you weren't eaten (chap), Tuesday, 25 January 2011 22:41 (fourteen years ago)
Waiting for the spoof about well behaved teenagers, called "Shirts"
― Evan, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 23:06 (fourteen years ago)
The "class discussion" element of the original series is being kind of over-magnified by the Graun there. There's basically the posh kids and everyone else and the treatment of the former doesn't extend much beyond "lol comedy poshos".― Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 January 2011
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 19 January 2011
― salsa shark, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 23:14 (fourteen years ago)
new uk one has potential no? a complete non-episode plot wise but the characters dont fill me with seething rage as they did last season
― Popper, Thursday, 27 January 2011 23:42 (fourteen years ago)
is the UK one back?
― Gukbe, Friday, 28 January 2011 05:05 (fourteen years ago)
The ginger kid's called Aloysius, which is a winner. Frankie is thew girl from The Golden Compass; freaky. Who the fuck played her older dad?!
― Ukranian crocodile that swallowed a mobile phone (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 28 January 2011 08:29 (fourteen years ago)
But yes Gukbe, first episode last night on E4.
http://sickmouthy.wordpress.com/2011/01/28/show-me-some-skins/
― Ukranian crocodile that swallowed a mobile phone (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 28 January 2011 08:30 (fourteen years ago)
Pretty ropey I thought, I'd consider it good manners for a TV show with an all-new cast to actually introduce them properly rather than going straight into one person's angst. Needed a bit more ensemble action, camaraderie and laughs and less emo.
Rocker dude and his ginger sidekick have potential but it doesn't really have the feeling of being one big gang. Rugby dude is so wooden.
Also, do A-Level students really get thrown straight into PE on the first day at a new college?
― Matt DC, Friday, 28 January 2011 09:35 (fourteen years ago)
do a-level students even do PE at all?
more pertinently, why am i clicking on a thread about a show i haven't seen in four years?
― read before patoing (history mayne), Friday, 28 January 2011 09:38 (fourteen years ago)
I think the PE scene was an excuse to show a roomfull of girls getting changed.
― Matt DC, Friday, 28 January 2011 09:40 (fourteen years ago)
Was that John Sessions playing her dad? It's bugging the shit out of me.
I think there's potential here, but yeah, it's gonna take a few episodes to get to know them. Not having any bridge from last cohort to this cohort is a trouble; we had Effie and thingy last time.
― Ukranian crocodile that swallowed a mobile phone (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 28 January 2011 09:44 (fourteen years ago)
They could have used Freddie's little sister I suppose, although that might have been a bit of a shadow over the story what with her brother having been pointlessly beaten to death the previous year.
― Matt DC, Friday, 28 January 2011 09:47 (fourteen years ago)
I've blotted those last two episodes out of my mind. Total shark-jump-fest.
― Ukranian crocodile that swallowed a mobile phone (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 28 January 2011 13:09 (fourteen years ago)
Needed a bit more ensemble action, camaraderie and laughs and less emo.Rocker dude and his ginger sidekick have potential but it doesn't really have the feeling of being one big gang. Rugby dude is so wooden.
― salsa shark, Friday, 28 January 2011 13:56 (fourteen years ago)
Saw it last night. Def more potential than last season (which was just dreadful, so it's not saying that much. Some parts didn't ring too true. I was never sure what was going on with the group of girls Frankie falls in with. They seem to be led by a bullying alpha-female type, yet the rest of their gang are pretty much nice-but-dim types who appear to be kind of dorky. I couldn't quite understand how their allegiance to Minnie worked.
Really looking forward to the Beavis and Butthead episodes. They seem like fun dudes.
― Bernard V. O'Hare (dog latin), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 12:08 (fourteen years ago)
OK so I've only just started watching this now from the beginning and I realize that it's probably way too late to start a discussion about the first series but a) I feel like I'm the only person who is extremely annoyed by Cassie and b) I just saw this
― acrobat, Wednesday, September 26, 2007 10:58 AM (3 years ago) Bookmark
YOU ARE NOT ALONE! In fact, I can't get over how much they look alike. It was freaking me out last night.
― ENBB, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 14:24 (fourteen years ago)
Ok I have watched all of series one in the last 2 days. It's sort of trashy and awful at times but other moments are amazing and I'm hooked. I love this fucking show.
― ENBB, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 21:21 (fourteen years ago)
And I don't hate Cassie anymore.
― ENBB, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 21:24 (fourteen years ago)
Series 2 is the best iirc
― Inevitable stupid dubstep mix (chap), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 21:33 (fourteen years ago)
Watching the 1st ep now. I didn't expect to see Bill Bailey in this. lol.
― ENBB, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 21:42 (fourteen years ago)
Series 2 is indeed the best, although don't expect to go on not hating Cassie for long.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 21:53 (fourteen years ago)
Second episode was a lot better I thought, there seems to be a lot less sex, drugs and cool people in this series and a lot more of the crippling social awkwardness of being a teenager.
Seems to be a bit short on dudes so far though, are there some cast members we haven't seen yet?
― Matt DC, Friday, 4 February 2011 10:14 (fourteen years ago)
nice to see a program say look its not that you listen to metal its that youre a bellend ok
theres more guys in it but theyre at the periphery at the moment think the rugby boyfriend is a character and theres the mysterious guy who talked to frankie at the end of the first ep
― Popper, Friday, 4 February 2011 11:45 (fourteen years ago)
I thought mysterious guy and rugby boyfriend were the same person, maybe I wasn't paying attention.
― Matt DC, Friday, 4 February 2011 11:56 (fourteen years ago)
Saw the metal episode on catchup. best Skins in a very long time, and plenty of LOL moments. I've known people so precisely like the main character in my life, that it was scathingly close to real life. Love the idea of a record that is so metal it instantly makes you deaf.
― Bernard V. O'Hare (dog latin), Tuesday, 8 February 2011 12:02 (fourteen years ago)
Yeah, I really liked that ep, it stands out as one of the best ones for sure. Agreed about the LOLs and character accuracy. There are a couple dudes I know who were probably very much like this Rich dude when they were 16/17 (and to a degree still are now).
Apparently the deafness-inducing song is called Misplaced Abortion and was made by the same dude who did the show's intros.
― salsa shark, Tuesday, 8 February 2011 13:27 (fourteen years ago)
I enjoyed the first episode actually. It seems like they're taking a more straightfoward tack, with more believable characters and less wacky shit. Frankie's coming out of her shell has the potential to be a very sweet plot thread.
I was never sure what was going on with the group of girls Frankie falls in with. They seem to be led by a bullying alpha-female type, yet the rest of their gang are pretty much nice-but-dim types who appear to be kind of dorky. I couldn't quite understand how their allegiance to Minnie worked.
Nah, made sense to me - they are old friends, the other two like Minnie but have grown up faster than her. They despair of her but indulge her sometimes. They never actually joined in the bullying aside from a bit of mild piss-taking.
― Inevitable stupid dubstep mix (chap), Tuesday, 8 February 2011 13:46 (fourteen years ago)
Anyway, I'll probably watch the second episode this evening.
― Inevitable stupid dubstep mix (chap), Tuesday, 8 February 2011 13:47 (fourteen years ago)
The first episode was a mess, in going immediately through Frankie's eyes they glossed over all the characters and yeah the relationship between the three girls just looked like these idiots running round doing stuff. Second one a lot better but really they should have gone for some kind of scene-setting episode first.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 8 February 2011 14:06 (fourteen years ago)
I dunno, I like the fact they're being introduced slowly to the audience and to each other. A first day at school is confusing, so it kind of mimics this. It means there's a certain amount of uncertainty among the characters, and this works since none of them are exactly social magnets (even Minnie seems to be kidding herself on this front).
But I did think the first episode was a bit messy and unparsable. I guess and hope it'll make more sense in context with this week's ep.
― Bernard V. O'Hare (dog latin), Tuesday, 8 February 2011 14:10 (fourteen years ago)
any thoughts on this week's episode?
As predicted, it shed a bit of light on the relationship with the girls' gang. Not a revelatory plotline though.
Saw some of the Skins kids walking through the corridor at work yesterday, whcih was quite amusing.
― dentarthurdent (dog latin), Friday, 11 February 2011 15:08 (fourteen years ago)
I was really worried that skins had jumped the shark when they announced the characters for this season. Youve got the androgynous one, the jock, the crazy bitch, the metal head etc. I'm really glad to be proved wrong, in season 3-4 you had very "normal" characters, less stereotypical and it sucked. Skins is really good at taking a common teenage stereotype and saying look these people aren't molded in some factory, they want to be something, try really hard to the extent it fucks up their own lives and relationships and when they get to where they want to be it wasn't worth the journey.
Good episode I thought, not exactly classic but it seems like its waiting to set up confrontations between characters after we get to know whats inside their heads rather than say having effie jump cook in episode one and then never explain why other than haha theyre both sociopaths or something.
― Popper, Saturday, 12 February 2011 17:58 (fourteen years ago)
The precocious child in this one is reading Infinite Jest!
― Matt DC, Thursday, 17 February 2011 22:51 (fourteen years ago)
I really really hate the way every younger brother/sister character in these shows has to be wise beyond their years
― Number None, Friday, 18 February 2011 00:00 (fourteen years ago)
I didn't notice that Matt, glad you pointed it out.
First two episodes of this were fun, but these ones have just felt... I dunno, functional maybe? I don't feel as emotionally involved with the characters as I did in, say, series 1. I do like Grace and metal dude though - please don't let them break up, that would suck.
Wahey, that's what I think about it anyway...
― chandelier falling through a bar in a batman costume (dog latin), Friday, 18 February 2011 00:46 (fourteen years ago)
Some good tunes on this one though - Charles B's Lack Of Love particularly
― chandelier falling through a bar in a batman costume (dog latin), Friday, 18 February 2011 00:52 (fourteen years ago)
Was that the one playing in the club scene? Meant to find out what it was
― Number None, Friday, 18 February 2011 01:18 (fourteen years ago)
I think so...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1CU14lP-ik
Also - what was that remix of Grinderman's "No Pussy Blues" at the end? Was that an in-house production?
― chandelier falling through a bar in a batman costume (dog latin), Friday, 18 February 2011 01:29 (fourteen years ago)
Cool, thanks. Think there were a few remixes of "No Pussy Blues", couldn't tell you who it was by though
― Number None, Friday, 18 February 2011 01:53 (fourteen years ago)
Aloysius = best Skins character ever.
― Matt DC, Friday, 4 March 2011 10:10 (fourteen years ago)
missed it this week... catch up over the weekend.
― barieling cosder chout a fagh in a ballme thrantuman (dog latin), Friday, 4 March 2011 10:28 (fourteen years ago)
It's great, closest in spirit to the first series.
SPOILER - at one point a cow gets blown up.
― Matt DC, Friday, 4 March 2011 10:29 (fourteen years ago)
Not my favorite episode but Alo is a good good character and series is still quite good. Lacking something though, not sure what it is.
― Popper, Saturday, 5 March 2011 23:27 (fourteen years ago)
So, the series has ended. I don't dislike any of the characters, and several of them (Min and Nick) have clearly been on (short) journeys, but yeah, I've been pretty underwhelmed. Just no emotional connection. Even if the last cohort got screwed up by focusing on Effie / Freddie and the stupid murder, it still had JJ, Cook, Emily and Naomi, all of whom hit really big emotional peaks in certain episodes. I never felt even remotely close to tears this season.
― lol sickmouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 18 March 2011 14:07 (fourteen years ago)
The final scene sucked big time - "you're a beautiful headfuck" or whatever. I ended up watching this series after vowing not to in the wake of the ridiculousness of the last one and in comparison to that it was alright.
― Number None, Friday, 18 March 2011 14:11 (fourteen years ago)
I enjoyed this season, aiming less for emotional intensity throughout was definitely the way to go. They just seem like an ordinary bunch of kids by and large and it's made it more entertaining.
― Matt DC, Friday, 18 March 2011 14:16 (fourteen years ago)
argh why did they turn rich into nicholas hoult?
i loved this season - a bit underwhelming yeah but much, much prefer this to the non-stop wangst of the last crew. These guys are at least funny.
― Roz, Friday, 18 March 2011 17:13 (fourteen years ago)
"My teacher asked us to describe something beautiful, and I said 9/11... I saw it happening on TV in the carehome when I was 6."
This was the biggest WTF moment of Skins ever TBH.
― farielan chosder bout a chagh an i ballme trantuming (dog latin), Friday, 18 March 2011 18:50 (fourteen years ago)
Started watching the Series 2 box set the other night. Cassie's slap on Sid is the best TV slap I've ever seen.
― territory of the magic wand (Chris), Sunday, 27 March 2011 17:10 (fourteen years ago)
I should probably stop watching this. Getting a bit OTT even for Skins...
― salsa shark, Sunday, 5 February 2012 18:56 (thirteen years ago)
aw, i miss cook
― j., Tuesday, 21 February 2012 04:16 (thirteen years ago)
WAAAAAAYYYYY too many advert breaks these days too. Last night's episode was pretty dull TBH.
― Alexandre Dumbass (dog latin), Tuesday, 21 February 2012 10:47 (thirteen years ago)
just started on s1. (Library DVDs are scratched up, I suspect some fundamentalist New York lunatic.)
actors are p damn good, I can't imagine any US teen shows have matched it lately even w/ the slickness.
― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 9 February 2013 20:18 (twelve years ago)
Shame to miss out on the original music
― Gukbe, Sunday, 10 February 2013 01:37 (twelve years ago)
you mean they altered the sndtrk re rights?
"Totally Wired" was on the first ep.
― saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 10 February 2013 06:46 (twelve years ago)
Yeah, at least on the UK DVD I saw.
― Gukbe, Sunday, 10 February 2013 11:02 (twelve years ago)
Cassie is in the next episode of the news series! I haven't watched beyond series 2 but I am so watching that.
― Chris, Wednesday, 10 July 2013 18:53 (twelve years ago)