― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 12:55 (nineteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:07 (nineteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:10 (nineteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:10 (nineteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:15 (nineteen years ago)
make sure their repulsive brats don't have to go to school with poor/black people
makes sense as they don't want to get their phone nicked/be beaten up for being 'too posh' [/ad glib]
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:17 (nineteen years ago)
Imagine! A grown woman camping in a Wendy house!
― Bhumibol Adulyadej (Lucretia My Reflection), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:18 (nineteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:19 (nineteen years ago)
Not as repulsive as the program which had anti-kids people on it. Christ, I'm not against people who don't want kids, but some were just so... dumb and arrogant. "The parents deliberately run into me with their XL buggies! I can't shop on saturday!"
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:24 (nineteen years ago)
otm - it really pissed me off that somehow it was about anybody except this rather bizarre bunch. Where's my programme!
― Edward Trifle (Ned Trifle IV), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:25 (nineteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:25 (nineteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:26 (nineteen years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:27 (nineteen years ago)
Obviously, I didn't see the program, but some parents do seem to lose perspective when it comes to their progeny - but it seems to be people who had problems with entitlement issues to start with, and the breeding exarcerbates tendencies they already had, rather than parenthood inherently befuddling your brain and morality.
― The Whistling Bus (kate), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:30 (nineteen years ago)
In London, yes.
Didn't see the program btw, but probably don't need to.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:31 (nineteen years ago)
On TV last night I saw more legalised begging for leftovers from the capitalist bouillabase then another identikit sub-CSI Brit police procedural programme about missing people and kidnapping except they obviously thought they were making Magnolia 2.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:33 (nineteen years ago)
-- The Whistling Bus (masonicboo...), January 24th, 2007.
i don't really know what this means. people with 'entitlement issues' = 'people who can't afford private school'?
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward Trifle (Ned Trifle IV), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:37 (nineteen years ago)
― The Whistling Bus (kate), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:38 (nineteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:39 (nineteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:40 (nineteen years ago)
― The Whistling Bus (kate), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Edward Trifle (Ned Trifle IV), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:47 (nineteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:48 (nineteen years ago)
― The Whistling Bus (kate), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:49 (nineteen years ago)
When I was a kid you went to your local comprehensive (or local Catholic comp in my case) and that was that. There you'd find, one would hope, a good racial and socioeconomic mix (though mine, being where it was and what it was, never had the former). Some kids went on to University (a handful to Oxbridge colleges), lots passed O-levels and CSEs, a few got vocational qualifications, a handful lit fires in the bike sheds, threw acid at teachers and ended up...er, running their own haulage business and living in a bigger house than me. But never mind.
Now, we have "choice", which means that most schools in Lewisham and Brixton no longer have that mix - all the middle-class white kids go to school in Orpington or wherever. It should be a national scandal but it doesn't seem to be.
I want Ava to have the rough'n'tumble (but not too rough - she's only little) Comp experience with kids from every background you find in SE London. If she's as smart as we like to imagine she is, she'll do OK. But do such schools exist any more?
(Oh, and I'm incredibly careful with my Mutsy Duo Seat buggy - to the extent that I do farcical eight-point turns down alleys so as not to get in anyone's way. I'm probably not aggressive enough...)
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:53 (nineteen years ago)
x-post
― The Whistling Bus (kate), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:53 (nineteen years ago)
oh that's been true for a while. hence 'polish muslims will rule us all' type mail articles.
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:55 (nineteen years ago)
Oh yeah, I remember that one, that was horrible and I'm pretty much an anti-kids person myself
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:56 (nineteen years ago)
― The Whistling Bus (kate), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:57 (nineteen years ago)
I love you, Marcello! :-)
If Ophelia's doesn't inherit my dumbness, but THom's brain, she'll do fine without my help. :-) If she's pretty clever then I'll probably send her to that prep school. It seems to be massively better in the "creating snobby kids" department. When I went to said school it was so depressing: I remember my friend being ridiculed because her parents were working class (mom cleaning lady). :-( But they prepped for your university. If you managed to survive, you were bound for university.
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:57 (nineteen years ago)
Or
What Michael J said.
I don't mind buggies, and will happily help people on and off trains and buses with them, even though I'm not mad about kids and don't have any. Chirp chirp.
― accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:57 (nineteen years ago)
But I suppose "more tax breaks for working mothers" is more easily legislatable than the somewhat B.Jones-ish "outlaw fuckwittage".
― The Whistling Bus (kate), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:59 (nineteen years ago)
We have a Bugaboo which is quite small and I rarely if ever bump into people unless they are asking for it. haha I'm kidding. I'm howvever going to buy a small one cause I'm going to Tokyo and need sth small for those damb staircases (?) in the metro). Any tips on what to buy?
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 13:59 (nineteen years ago)
kate -- shrinking population is a good thing though!
in all senses except uh-oh who gonna pay (public sector) pensions.
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:02 (nineteen years ago)
Don't want to even think about the school thing.
― Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:02 (nineteen years ago)
Like, dude, you chose to breed, I didn't. I don't glare at random strangers if they don't help me carry my guitar amp up stairs.
But yes, I have a lot of issues about this. I inherently project smugness onto any random parent I see - my mum and I were people watching in the Rookery and this woman with a buggy went by and I thought "SMUG SMUG SMUG AS FUCK!" and she thought "She looks so TRAPPED and DESPERATE" so it's all about projection, isn't it?
― The Whistling Bus (kate), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:02 (nineteen years ago)
Middle class parents don't have to send their kids to the same school as poor/black people... pay attention there. They get good jobs, the scum work in McDonalds, do you see?
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:03 (nineteen years ago)
Some people are asking for it, though. I mean, a person pushing a buggy =two people (at least), one of whom can't ask you to get out of the way on their own behalf. So, you know, move. On the other hand, sometimes I feel like Kate.
― accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:05 (nineteen years ago)
i don't like kids but they only really irritate me when they start screaming (in public) and will not stop - i usually recognise that this is my problem unless i see the parents ignoring or worse encouraging the brat, at which stage i start thinking about homicide.
― lex pretend (lex pretend), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:06 (nineteen years ago)
― lex pretend (lex pretend), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:07 (nineteen years ago)
No, sorry, having a buggie is not an automatic "get to the head of the queue free!" card. People with buggies can say "excuse me" like everyone else, if there is a genuine blockage, or else wait their turn.
But this is about the rudeness of certain mothers, not a blanket put-down of all breeders.
― The Whistling Bus (kate), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:08 (nineteen years ago)
Sorry, bit of a specific rant there.
No, sorry, having a buggie is not an automatic "get to the head of the queue free!" card.
Er, I didn't say anything about queues. I just meant on the path, or in general. Of course I don't think people should jump queues.
― accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:09 (nineteen years ago)
-- Tom D. (tom_donnell...), January 24th, 2007.
i guess that figures -- but with hospitals i really don't see it.
xpost
the child will pretty much thrive whatever school system its in (given normal intelligence)
yeah i don't think parents can be so uh dispassionate about it. 'pretty much thrive'!
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:09 (nineteen years ago)
― The Whistling Bus (kate), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:10 (nineteen years ago)
― The Whistling Bus (kate), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:10 (nineteen years ago)
Oh that's just about privatising the NHS
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:11 (nineteen years ago)
But who (if anyone) are you blaming here Tom?
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:12 (nineteen years ago)
I have a BIG problem with women who use EMPTY buggies as a ramming rod down busy streets/supermarkets. What's up with that??
― marianna lcl (marianna lcl), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:12 (nineteen years ago)
Cause we've done it a million times and we can do it ourselves. :-) I don't want to be a bother.
...that said, a lot of my bitterness is down to never having had children of mine own. If I had had children, you can bet I'd be shoving to the front of the train carriage shouting "GET OUT OF THE WAY, FUTURE PRIME MINISTER COMING THROUGH!!!" or something.
Rofl.
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:12 (nineteen years ago)
The middle classes of course!
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:13 (nineteen years ago)
what about those that put their frigging lapdogs in buggies?
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:14 (nineteen years ago)
And those are the very people who will say "I have a BUGGY, you heartless bitch!" and then sweep by you before you can answer "but you have a frozen turkey in it!" and everyone will think you are hateful. And that woman's kids will grow up to be like her and yours will grow up to be like you, and hers are the ones who will get on telly.
― accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:15 (nineteen years ago)
― marianna lcl (marianna lcl), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:15 (nineteen years ago)
can't hate on these, this is what paris would do if she didn't have a designer handbag to put her dog in
― lex pretend (lex pretend), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:17 (nineteen years ago)
― marianna lcl (marianna lcl), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:18 (nineteen years ago)
"turn out ok" then!
― lex pretend (lex pretend), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:18 (nineteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:23 (nineteen years ago)
We all go off and do all sorts of things together, Sites of historic interest, WOMAD/Reading Rock festivals, Legoland, Busted gig, and they're off to see "The King and I" tonight. This doesn't so much reflect in their progress in their school work directly, but it does create a 'thirst for knowledge' that keeps them interested in what they're learning.
― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:30 (nineteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:32 (nineteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:42 (nineteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:46 (nineteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:49 (nineteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:49 (nineteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:51 (nineteen years ago)
― The Whistling Bus (kate), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:53 (nineteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:54 (nineteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:57 (nineteen years ago)
― lex pretend (lex pretend), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:57 (nineteen years ago)
Eh?
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 14:58 (nineteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:03 (nineteen years ago)
There, is that enough explanation? :)
― Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:07 (nineteen years ago)
I say this too often (IRL), but I'll say it here: It's not how well they can read, it's how well they can express their understanding about the world and how it works. That's what amazes and astounds me often enough to make me know they're 'thriving'.
― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:14 (nineteen years ago)
1) Private (expensive, obv)2) In some boroughs Faith schools (e.g Roman Catholic) These are always over-subscribed.3) State Grammar School (not many left) - pass the exam with high enough marks and you're in. Typically 10-15 applicants chasing every place. 4) Comprehensives - entry criteria usually distance from school or somesuch. You can apply to comps in your own borough or in adjacent boroughs. Some comps have additional entry criteria such as faith. Some are single-sex. Some have sixth-forms, some don't. In my borough half of the comps are massively oversubscribed. These are the ones with high exam results, few discipline problems, attract the best teachers and have low truancy. The other half are massively undersubscribed, get relatively poor exam results etc etc.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:14 (nineteen years ago)
Aspergers shirley
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:16 (nineteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:17 (nineteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:21 (nineteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:22 (nineteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:24 (nineteen years ago)
surely 'cabinet ministers'
lol that would involve ppl giving 1x fuck
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:27 (nineteen years ago)
It's sad that TV programmes are your only source of information.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:31 (nineteen years ago)
Yes, but they haven't got any choice but to, have they?
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:32 (nineteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:35 (nineteen years ago)
thought better of it.
― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:37 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:40 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 15:41 (nineteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 16:01 (nineteen years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 16:02 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 16:03 (nineteen years ago)
Nauseating
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 16:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 16:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 16:51 (nineteen years ago)
I have no specific goals *for* the kids. Alice wants to be a pop star. Amber wants to be a model. They are 6 and 8 respectively. If they still do when they're 16 and 18, that's their goal. If not, they can still do whatever they feel like doing.
― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 16:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 16:56 (nineteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 16:57 (nineteen years ago)
― The Whistling Bus (kate), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 16:57 (nineteen years ago)
I don't recall the late, unlamented "may the parents of Dunblane rot in hell" Junor ever turning up to award the prize, however.
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 16:58 (nineteen years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 16:59 (nineteen years ago)
― Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:00 (nineteen years ago)
1) Oh they would love to. Actually,Alice at the moment has some of Nikki's mannerisms. Except one time I called her "nikki" and she sort of in small writing said "don't call me that.." 2) I'm so tempted to teach them Russell's one phrase "pull down my trousers and pants" for no other reason than to SCARE THE OTHER KIDS PARENTS!!! (obv I'm not actually going to do this)
― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:03 (nineteen years ago)
It's mine. Pretty much.
― Sir Tehrance HoBB (the pirate king), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:11 (nineteen years ago)
God Forbid she should inherit the dumb genes of the person who taught herself flawless English from WATCHING TV.
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:17 (nineteen years ago)
Not being a parent myself so probably in no way qualified to comment on this but given the vast number of people who, for whatever reasons, are not thriving in any way, I would think that turning out a child who in life "pretty much" thrives is something fairly good to aim for. I am a fairly morose bugger though.
I mean you want them to be deliriously happy for the rest of their lives, but that's not going to happen, is it?
― Stone Monkey (Stone Monkey), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:25 (nineteen years ago)
You heard me.
― accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:35 (nineteen years ago)
I just laughed so loud that I upset my deaf dog.
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:56 (nineteen years ago)
― lex pretend (lex pretend), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 17:57 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:15 (nineteen years ago)
― The Vintner's Lipogram (OleM), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 18:21 (nineteen years ago)
No no no. Who are the best teachers - the ones that get 30 A-star grades out of a class who are all expected and capable of getting that grade - or the ones that can get 3 A's out of a class of 30 that are all expected to get E's and F's?
Yes, there are plenty of excellent teachers in the "best" schools, but there are also plenty who prefer the job satisfaction of teaching in more challenging schools.
― Si.C@rter (SiC@rter), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 22:38 (nineteen years ago)
You'd be surprised.
― Si.C@rter (SiC@rter), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 22:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Mary (Mary), Wednesday, 24 January 2007 23:14 (nineteen years ago)