Portrayal of people of Asian descent in American/ Western culture

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Hi everyone btw. Longtime lurker here. The recent thread on the Ronaldinho racist bottle opener thread touched upon the portrayal of pakistanis and other asian people in American culture, and I's like to explore this further. Is it only me who is seriously troubled by, for example, the portrayal of Apu on the Simpsons?

tom, Friday, 23 March 2007 10:27 (eighteen years ago)

get yo popcrn rdy

A B C, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:07 (eighteen years ago)

18 YEARS OF APU! HOW DO THEY GET AWAY WITH IT?

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:09 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.pickledpolitics.com/archives/52

Some argue that it’s far more useful for NRIs (non-resident Indians) to have characters who are of Indian heritage, but otherwise identical to other characters, to show the white man “look we’re just like you!”. However I think most white people are capable of accepting the fact we’re NOT like them in some respects, without feeling threatened. Apu could’ve been like countless characters in British soaps or TV shows, called Bobby or Kurt, distinguishable as Asian only by their colour.

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:18 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/003470.html

By the time I saw Apocalypse Now (from beginning to end) in college, the racial issues were on the forefront. This movie took the central issues of Conrad’s novel and moved them into the Vietnam war. The result was harrowing—predictable with with sledgehammer director Oliver Stone at the helm.

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:19 (eighteen years ago)

I can't think of any Asian guys on British TV called Bobby or Kurt, but I may have misread this.

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:21 (eighteen years ago)

Dev's real name is actually Hank Jr III but he changed it for the residents of Wetherfield who are not used to these exotic American names :)

Sarah, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:26 (eighteen years ago)

Dev IS evil though, right? I am not up with Corrie, but the clips shown of him on Harry Hill are always him leching over passing young FILLIES and stroking eg cans of beans in wot is meant to be flirtatious way and LEERING menacingly. Has he forgotten poor Sunita already (I admit I have forgotten whether she is dead or alive oops).

Sarah, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:27 (eighteen years ago)

Oh my gosh he has other children with women at his other shops and Sunita left! I think I will resume watching Corrie again especially after they found a bomb. Sorry this is off topic.

Sarah, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:33 (eighteen years ago)

Charming example of Apu being used as a blatant racist insult from Youtube comments:

Ferrari350 (1 week ago)
hey you fuckin PAKI go eat ur fuckin cats and dogs MORTO DI FAME !! VA FANCULO !! return in ur depaneur APU !!


The Pickledpolitics article is good and makes some fair points however the surface presentation of Apu is of a racial stereotype which can only adds fuel to this kind of mindless bigotry.

tom, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:34 (eighteen years ago)

we talked about Apu before on another thread about how disappointed I was when they made him a father with 8 kids because although it may not have been recognised in the States, it felt like pandering to nasty stereotypes in the UK re Asians with big families. of course Apu was a stereotype before that but I felt that it was more playful even celebratory and not derogatory really - at least not of the character himself, only the tokenist aspect of his inclusion and position (which may well be valid but this is always difficult - how many of the show's writers are Asian etc.).

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:39 (eighteen years ago)

and we are talking about a character who was established nearly 18 years ago...there are so few precedents for that on TV really, esp. mere supporting originally foreign characters.

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:41 (eighteen years ago)

but they only had 8 kids because when they were trying to concieve his wife got an overdose of fertility drugs from homer & marge!!!!

also plz remember apu has been portrayed by, what, like 40 or 50 different writers in the 18 years of the simpsons, so whether he's a racist stereotype or not depends on who's writing him

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:45 (eighteen years ago)

i dunno maybe this is splitting hairs but i think theres a difference between a stereotype of asian immigrants with lots of kids & asian immigrant couples who are trying to concieve and end up having octuplets?? the 2nd half of the episode is a dionne quints satire

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:49 (eighteen years ago)

blueski is attempting disingenuousness, dont forget

hes a little better at it now, than he used to be

600, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:50 (eighteen years ago)

ok, now onto Fisher Stevens in Short Circuit... a long time ago, aye, but wtf?

tom, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:50 (eighteen years ago)

andwhat it's the outcome not the setup that bugged me re Apu's kids and just the sense of what you end up with.

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:53 (eighteen years ago)

The muddying water with the Simpsons is that everyone is a ridiculous stereotype, so treating Apu as an 'everyman' character wouldn't quite work. I don't know, I don't find him offensive or particularly racist.

Matt DC, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:54 (eighteen years ago)

and 600 you are wrong there (on both counts!)

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 11:54 (eighteen years ago)

I think they could have employed an Indian rather than a white man doing Standard Comedy Asian Voice.

onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:00 (eighteen years ago)

Apu has always spoken excellent English.

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:08 (eighteen years ago)

Yes, with Comedy Asian Voice.

onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:11 (eighteen years ago)

But it is still the standard Curry and Chips/"Johnny Five I am thinking you have broken your programming" accent, right?

Dom Passantino, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:11 (eighteen years ago)

(xp)

Dom Passantino, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:11 (eighteen years ago)

Apu's voice is great and I quite enjoy quoting him half on that basis and half on that what he's saying is actually funny in itself. This would be no different from quoting Willie, the Sea Captain etc.

See also Paul Whitehouse on Down The Line. "Voht is point?"

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:20 (eighteen years ago)

I need to see Borat film I guess, and then read the thread.

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:28 (eighteen years ago)

Really sick of people quoting Borat tho. Enough.

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:28 (eighteen years ago)

I mean, and this is an ill-formed opinion that I could certainly do with a lot more thought, but is relying on an obvious stereotype necessarily racist/bigotted? I mean, American TV can get away with the wobbly-headed subservient "thanking you sir yes please" Indian character because the Indian population of America is trace. Similarly, British adverts for Mexican food all rely on the grubby faced poncho wearing dude waving a pistol about caricature. If you swapped our Asian population for America's Hispanic one, neither would be able to pull such a stunt because the outcry would be defeaning, surely?

Dom Passantino, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:31 (eighteen years ago)

Really sick of people quoting Borat tho. Enough.

So true. I also don't think it matters how Apu ended up with eight kids, he *has* eight kids. Intention also doesn't mean jackshit, it's what is *there* that counts.

nathalie, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:45 (eighteen years ago)

numerous people I met in India referred to thing as "like Apu from the Simpsons".

Yerac, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:48 (eighteen years ago)

Thing?

Ned Raggett, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:55 (eighteen years ago)

OK, I don't have a television and I don't live in America, but are there any Asian characters on Merkin telly that aren't Apu from the Simpsons?

A few months back, the Guardian Guide had this whole article about how American television was stealing all our black or Asian actors to star on ER and stuff, and featured about half a dozen. Has this really made no cultural impact?

Masonic Boom, Friday, 23 March 2007 12:59 (eighteen years ago)

referred to "things", sorry. I was about to say that most Indians I met in India and even most of my Indian friends in the states, seem to be happy to do their Apu impressions all the time. And it took me like 3 weeks to stop wobbling my head after i came back from India.

Yerac, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:04 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.aspecialthing.com/news/TheOffice_Kelly.jpg

The Diwali episode was v. funny.

Gukbe, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:08 (eighteen years ago)

Aishwarya Rai has gotten lots of good press in the US, they just need to do the same for Abhishek Bachchan. rrrowr.

Yerac, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:09 (eighteen years ago)

mindy kaling is my favorite person on television

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:30 (eighteen years ago)

television was stealing all our black or Asian actors to star on ER and stuff

Parminder Nagra is my new ER crush as they got rid of Crush Shame Kerry Weaver last night.

onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:34 (eighteen years ago)

PARMINDER NAGRA IS MINE MINE MINE MINE MINE STEP OFF

HI DERE, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:44 (eighteen years ago)

I saw her first!
http://www.videoservicecorp.com/images/bend%20beckham%20ws.jpg

onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:46 (eighteen years ago)

(ER spoilers!)

> So true. I also don't think it matters how Apu ended up with eight kids, he *has* eight kids. Intention also doesn't mean jackshit, it's what is *there* that counts.

has large numbers of offspring ever been a stereotype for asians though? crowded houses, yes, but that's usually extended family rather than a nuclear couple and their children.

koogs, Friday, 23 March 2007 13:53 (eighteen years ago)

it's all related (chortle)

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:10 (eighteen years ago)

so backup (from article on preferred sex of offspring):

http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/journals/3010004b.html

"In all but one Indian state, ideal family size and son preference declined in tandem between the two surveys: The ideal number of children declined from 2.9 to 2.7, while the overall proportion of women wanting more sons than daughters decreased from 42% to 33%, and the average proportion of sons in the ideal family from 54% to 51%."

(have taken asia to mean india as we're talking about apu but, yes, asia is a big place)

oh, and what dom said. same is true for american's idea of english accents.

koogs, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:10 (eighteen years ago)

(I think discussion of Apu is problematic in several ways, largely because isolating his stereotype from the other stereotypes flying around The Simpsons seems problematic on first blush but looking at the Carl, the token black guy, and how he is basically a blank-slate cipher with no discernable "funny" traits, you kind of start wondering why they were afraid to go there with him but felt no compunction about making Apu the owner of a Kwiky-Mart. Contrast that with Hermes in "Futurama" with his myriad Jamaican jokes deeply intertwined with the tight-fisted accountant jokes, and it's a little like "Wait, they weren't afraid to play stereotypes here, so why were they afraid to do so there?")

HI DERE, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:19 (eighteen years ago)

Haha yeah I was going to mention Carl but realised I'd totally forgotten his name.

Matt DC, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:25 (eighteen years ago)

> but looking at the Carl, the token black guy

er...

http://www.drhibbert.it/Aree/hibbert-acconciature.htm

koogs, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:30 (eighteen years ago)

they've had Dr Hibbert's hairstyle changing with the times over the years..but nothing like this with Carl. It is curious I agree. But then Lenny has never really been explored either (as much as he may want Carl to do just that).

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:33 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah okay, I forgot Dr. Innapropriate Huxtable but that kind of reinforces the idea the black people on The Simpsons are hard-to-remember non-entities while Apu is a front-and-center integral supporting character, which was my thesis.

HI DERE, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:35 (eighteen years ago)

HOLY SHIT I really can't spell today ;_;

HI DERE, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:37 (eighteen years ago)

xpost

you kind of start wondering why they were afraid to go there with him but felt no compunction about making Apu the owner of a Kwiky-Mart

which is why, after reading many of the pro-Apu posts on here, I still feel uneasy. Is the message here that casual racism is ok when not directed at African-Americans?

tom, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:50 (eighteen years ago)

no the message is there is a big difference between a cartoon and a bottle opener that uses racist iconography.

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:51 (eighteen years ago)

did anybody see the recent ep set at the black church attended by dr hibbert, carl, dredrick tatum, the don king manager dude of tatum, and a bunch of other nobodies? it really drove home how terrible the simpsons has been at dealing with any legitimate black characters

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:52 (eighteen years ago)

Is ignorance that bleeds over into arguable racism better or worse than outright bigotry then? I'm honestly not sure I know the answer.

Dom Passantino, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:54 (eighteen years ago)

is it good that they admit it like that? i dunno. i got so tired of the Simpsons lampooning it's own lameness in that regard.

The old Apu-centred episodes are real classics in any case
("long have i dreamt of the day when one of you would be working for one of me", "please do not offer my God a peanut", "their clothes are different from our clothes" and so on)

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:54 (eighteen years ago)

no the message is there is a big difference between a cartoon and a bottle opener that uses racist iconography.

Why does the cartoon get off the hook here?

onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:54 (eighteen years ago)

also his Mum falling over ("YES!") ha ha ha

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:55 (eighteen years ago)

I've always been really uncomfortable with Apu, from his surname to his ha-ha look at the fat-belly-under-trousers and his Kwik-e-mart job.

.stet., Friday, 23 March 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)

What if the Simpsons had Ronaldinho as a guest star and Homer kept opening Duff bottles with his teeth?

onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)

you can't tell the difference between a cartoon and a bottle opener?

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)

also please note i did not say the cartoon is off the hook.

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)

I can tell the difference. I'm asking why casual racism is ok in cartoons.

onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:57 (eighteen years ago)

no one said it is!

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:57 (eighteen years ago)

fuckin xposts

onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:57 (eighteen years ago)

He's not saying it's OK in cartoons, he's saying it's OK as long as it abuses people he doesn't meet on a day to day basis.

Dom Passantino, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:57 (eighteen years ago)

i like the one where he plays the record for homer & it's this stereotypical dissonant south asian music and then he realizes its at the wrong speed & it changes to sweet bollywood pop stuff

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:57 (eighteen years ago)

So can we address why a US cartoon is quite happy to lampoon south Asian stereotypes but is scared to have black characters be anything more than forgettable extras?

onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:58 (eighteen years ago)

It's surely just a matter of numbers, though. I mean, how many Asians are there in America, percentage wise? Less than 1% at a guess, right?

Dom Passantino, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:59 (eighteen years ago)

i think tom should be worrying more about Borat than 17 yeard old animated characters.

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 14:59 (eighteen years ago)

are you fucking kidding?

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 23 March 2007 14:59 (eighteen years ago)

uh that was an xpost

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 23 March 2007 15:00 (eighteen years ago)

I mean, from an American viewpoint it's probably no different than a comedy 2D carciature of, I dunno, Belgians or the Swiss.

Dom Passantino, Friday, 23 March 2007 15:00 (eighteen years ago)

http://bonaldi.thehold.net/chiz/apu_2000.jpg

.stet., Friday, 23 March 2007 15:00 (eighteen years ago)

So can we address why a US cartoon is quite happy to lampoon south Asian stereotypes but is scared to have black characters be anything more than forgettable extras?

SLAVERY IT IS SIR, NOW WHICH WAY TO THE WELFARE OFFICE?

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 15:00 (eighteen years ago)

dom is it really that hard to go look up census information? keep in mind that the us govt defines "asian" completely different from the way it is generally done in the uk (central asians and arabs are all defined as "white" by our census, as well as hispanics as there is no separate category for us either--we are asked to note if we are of hispanic origin later).

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 23 March 2007 15:04 (eighteen years ago)

and of course the census wouldn't include a tremendous amount of people living in the cities which is where a significant portion of pakistanis live (most "asian" asians by american standards ie chinese japanese korean etc all seem to be moving out to the suburbs and taking their korea towns with them ;_;)

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 23 March 2007 15:05 (eighteen years ago)

3.4% according to the 2000 census, but it says Filipinos and Chinese make up the majority of that number. So taking what the "British" term "Asian" means (ie, Indian subcontinent), it must be sub-1%, right?

Dom Passantino, Friday, 23 March 2007 15:05 (eighteen years ago)

ie jesus fucking christ i am arguing with dom, time to get off the internets and get my coffee.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 23 March 2007 15:06 (eighteen years ago)

Asian Indians: 1.9m
Pakistanis: 204,000
Bangladeshis and Sri Lankans both sub 50k


So yeah, 0.7%. I was right.

Dom Passantino, Friday, 23 March 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)

Now that we've established that minorities are in the minority...

onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)

The characterization of Apu has always bothered me. He is a racist stereotype, plain and simple. While he's always used to non-racist ends, it's pretty much the same as if Aunt Jemima or Little Black Sambo were regular characters on the show.

But what about Groundskeeper Willie? He's a stereotypical charicature, too, though national rather than racial. And that doesn't bother me at all. Why not? Why is Willie so much less offensive to my limp-writsted liberal sensibilities than Apu? And why would I be so much more offended if Carl were presented as a collection of cheap Black sterotypes (heavy ebonics, whole fried chickens in his lunchbox, etc.)?

Well, I've been socially conditioned to think that lampooning "others" is wrong, and that certain specific forms of otherness are more taboo than others. This is a white man's POV, mind you. I have no problem when Black comedians make fun of Black stereotypes, or even when Hispanics mock Asians. My sense of what's permitted is based in the rules that seem to apply to me, as a straight, middle-class, American white man. Wrongness arises not from rational principles that apply to all human beings, but from arbitrary social rules that apply specifically to me.

My perception that Apu is a racist charicature is therefore passively racist in itself. This is because my perception presumes that the writers of The Simpsons are mostly White (which they are, as far as I know), and therefore of my tribe. Further, I'm presuming the existence of a unifying "White point-of-view" that I share with the writers of The Simpsons. Finally, I'm presuming that this White POV defines normalcy: otherness exists only in relation to normative Whiteness, and must be approached carefully.

So Willie is okay. Because he's White. Even though he's "different", he is more-or-less of "us". Therefore, we're allowed to make fun of him. After all, we (the writers of The Simpsons and I) are only making fun of ourselves. But Apu is different. My mental police-voice warns me that we really shouldn't be going there. I reassure myself that it's okay because Apu us such a stand-up guy, and I haven't heard anybody protesting about it, and hey, it's funny, right? When he talks all funny like that. (Even though I know there's a whole mess of doublethink in my justifications.) But Carl? No way. Uh-uh. Black is off limits. Everyone knows that.

Note that I'm not justifying the mental process I just described. In fact I find it troubling on many levels. I'm just trying to sort out how it works...

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 15:51 (eighteen years ago)

Get back to us when it's all sorted, then.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Friday, 23 March 2007 15:54 (eighteen years ago)

it's pretty much the same as if Aunt Jemima or Little Black Sambo were regular characters on the show.

the handling of Apu has always seemed much smarter than that to me. everyone's meant to like him. he's not incompetent. he speaks better English and knows more about American history/culture than most of the rest of the town (see the 'immigants' episode).

i think it's much worse that they had him cheat on his wife than anything to do with racial stereotyping (which the kids thing isn't really a direct product of, it's just an annoying irony imo).

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 15:56 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, ha-ha. Ha. Whee. Good one...

But it's sorted. And I suspect that what I'm describing is fairly common.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 15:58 (eighteen years ago)

i think the fact that apu got married & had a bunch of kids & cheated on his wife & etc etc etc is because he was one of the few characters on the show eligible for those sort of plotlines!!

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 15:58 (eighteen years ago)

i mean what are you gonna do, havechief wiggum cheat on his wife? moe has octuplets?

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 15:59 (eighteen years ago)

What about Hank's Laotian neighbours in King Of The Hill, particularly the Dad KHAAAAAN. I think that may also be more dubious than dear old Apu. But Apu's character is clearly intended to be more likeable to everyone as far as I can see, whereas KHAAAAN is such a dick.

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:01 (eighteen years ago)

Let's just agree to make fun of the East Timorese. They're fucked, anyway, and little-known in the west.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:02 (eighteen years ago)

But Apu's character is clearly intended to be more likeable to everyone

"Affectionate" stereotyping then?

onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:03 (eighteen years ago)

Man I hate those characters on king of the hill

JW, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:04 (eighteen years ago)

I'm not sure how I feel about King Of The Hill, but I think khan is humanized by the fact that he is an asshole.

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:04 (eighteen years ago)

If you like. What exactly are the stereotypes Apu is supposed to represent again? An Indian who runs a convenience store. Was that it?

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:04 (eighteen years ago)

"the handling of Apu has always seemed much smarter than that to me. everyone's meant to like him. he's not incompetent. he speaks better English and knows more about American history/culture than most of the rest of the town..."
-- blueski

Gotcha. Sorry, I wasn't explaining myself clearly. I meant that the characterization of Apu = Aunt Jemima or Little Black Sambo [given Apu's non-racial attributes]. Like if Little Black Sambo were a playmate of Bart's, and he had sticky-up hair twigs, and giant red lips, and was constantly chased by tigers whom he cleverly defeated by churning into butter ... but he was smart and cool and deep and knowledgeable and loved by all.

That would obviously cause a huge uproar, and would bother me personally (simply because I've been conditioned to be bothered by such things), but objectively speaking, it's not much different than what we see in Apu.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:05 (eighteen years ago)

xpost
I am troubled by Borat too, just less sure of my thinking - by exposing prejudice in others he's positive; by the dreadful caricaturisation of Kazakhstan he's very negative. I can't decide whether one outweighs the other or whether even attempting to balance the two is compatible with a belief that all racism is wrong. damn I'm confused now.




tom, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:05 (eighteen years ago)

Er...OK!

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:06 (eighteen years ago)

An Indian who runs a convenience store. Was that it?

thick accent
illegal alien
arranged marriage
huge family
rips people off(? not sure on that one but I think he's been known to pull a few strokes)
cornershop
huge unpronounceable surname

I think his Hinduism has been the butt of a few gags too but I can't remember them off the top of my head.

onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:12 (eighteen years ago)

Isn't he a bigamist too? Didn't he leave a child bride in India?

onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:13 (eighteen years ago)

that was the same arranged marriage you fucking idiot

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:18 (eighteen years ago)

I am actually trying to crystallise why none of the Indian people I know are offended by Apu and it's hurting my head.

Matt DC, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:19 (eighteen years ago)

Really sick of people quoting Borat tho. Enough.

blueski on Friday, 23 March 2007 12:28 (3 hours ago)

One of the worst things about the Borat movie is that it turned Borat into a series of stupid, easily adaptable catch phrases -- "Jagshemash!" "I like you do you like me?" etc.

Which also ruined the fun of quoting some of the better lines from the episodes -- "He will crush like Stalin" "We now take 10 minute silence for rememberance of Tishnik massacre" etc.

Hurting 2, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:20 (eighteen years ago)

I'm Indian. Apu used to bother me a little bit, but I've gotten over it, because the Simpsons worked with ethnic stereotyping to actually be funny, which is pretty much all I require. the stereotyping never seemed meanspirited either.

a thing that annoys me is the presentation of Indian-ness as though it's funny in and of itself. partly because it's lazy humor and partly because, well, racist. this often happens in situations where it's ambiguous whether the portrayal was even intended to be funny. I have this really clear memory of seeing the English Patient my first week in college (shut up, it was free, sponsored by the student film center). There's a scene where the Indian character (who's Sikh and wears a turban) is crouched on the ground, sweeping for a mine. It's a protracted moment of some suspense, so it's just Indian dude spread out on the ground for a minute, or something. and everyone in the theater started laughing, and I had no idea what was going on. the only thing I could figure was that the sight of an Indian man was somehow inherently funny. I was miffed. Indian film directors play into this sometime. that whole goddamn Bend it Like Beckham is nothing but playing, like, making aloo ghobi for laughs. that movie is the worst.

there's really no comparable history of racist iconography of South Asians to African Americans in America, though, obviously. and there just isn't that much of a problematic history at all, South Asian immigrants to the US being a relatively recent phenomenon, and a fair proportion of them being established as middle class pretty soon after arriving here. this is not to say there's no anti-Indian/Pakistani racism in America, but there just isn't a whole lot of painful acrimony to draw on. I'd imagine this is very, very different in Great Britain.

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:20 (eighteen years ago)

that was the same arranged marriage you fucking idiot

Yeah not remembering every fucking detail about a cartoon makes me a fucking idiot. So he married the same person twice?

onimo, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:22 (eighteen years ago)

Hell, Jews get stereotyped in film all the time, and we control Hollywood!

Hurting 2, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:23 (eighteen years ago)

the dreadful caricaturisation of Kazakhstan

i don't think this is what "borat" did. he's essentially a made up ethnicity, a mishmash of eastern-european jokes, and then instead of saying he's from kerplakistan or latveria or slaka or whatever they just picked a real country off the map. that's a different thing than actually caricaturing a place.

gff, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:23 (eighteen years ago)

and the form anti-South Asian racism seems to take these days is very much of the these-people-might-be-terrorists variety. so iconography that suggests that draws less on an Indian stereotype and more on a Muslim one.

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:24 (eighteen years ago)

IIRC apu is constantly having to remind the citizens of springfield that he's not muslim and they're like "oh, yeah... uh whatever"

Tracer Hand, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:35 (eighteen years ago)

Kahn on King of the Hill always seemed to entirely avoid charicature. His voice was done by toby huss, the dude who played 'artie, the strongest man in the world' on pete and pete. I'm not sure what to think about white dudes imitating asian accents. but kahn's wife and daughter are voiced by Lauren Tom who was born in the United States and is of asian-american descent.

deej, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:36 (eighteen years ago)

Rev Lovejoy classed his faith as 'miscellaneous' roffle

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:36 (eighteen years ago)

'be they christian, jewish, or... miscellaneous' 'i am hindu!! there are 700 million of us!!' 'aw, thats super'

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:38 (eighteen years ago)

xpost

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:38 (eighteen years ago)

i dont think i can stomach another is-king-of-the-hill-racist? argument

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:39 (eighteen years ago)

haha i forgot about that
pye poudre not to thread.

deej, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)

it so obviously isnt, and the people who think it is are so smug & ignorant, that i lost something like 15% of my faith in humanity just from engaging with them

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:41 (eighteen years ago)

i do think we've gotten to a really weird, tin-eared response to "racism" which basically means that nobody wants to learn anything about non-white or non-western culture so therefore if a character on tv isnt just a tan version of some 'neutral' white character they glance at it once and call it racism

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:42 (eighteen years ago)

BOBBY: You're so lucky, Connie, you're ethnic. Joseph and I are just nothing. We're just white and boring.
JOSEPH: Yeah.

Dom Passantino, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:43 (eighteen years ago)

horseshoe what you say is interesting for me. i'm not sure how it happened but growing up my awareness and recognition of Indian, Pakistani and other accents from that part of the world were established as a source of amusement quite early on...BUT no more amusing to me than other accents from all over the world including the regional accents of Britain and Ireland. the only differences are that i heard Indian and Pakistani accents a lot more than i heard, say, French accents. as a result i find mockery of accents in certain context no problem at all and i like to indulge in it myself - it doesn't really matter where the accent comes from. the only problem is the context in which that mockery occurs - this was one of the big issues on Celebrity Big Brother.

So I'm wondering whether you'd find Paul Whitehouse's skit on Down The Line where he phones up as an Indian-sounding man saying "love...voht is point? life...voht is point?" funny or offensive, out of interest - taking into account there's no visual representation and the humour arises partly from the character's attitude but also of course the pronuniciation of certain words he uses.

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:45 (eighteen years ago)

I know I didn't win many friends in the King of the Hill discussion. (And all that crap took place in the even less charming Idiocracy thread. Yeesh.)

Oh, yeah. Not to thread.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:49 (eighteen years ago)

I don't know that skit, blueski, but yeah. I get that a lot of non-Indians find the exaggerated Indian accent really funny. I...don't. I don't think it's racist exactly, it's just always awkward in those moments. like it would really be identifying against myself a little too much to find the way my parents talk funny, you know?

it seems I have endless banal examples! once when Ben Affleck was on the Daily Show he busted into a bizarro quasi-Indian accent (I can't remember the context, and I think he was actually imitating, like, Osama Bin Laden, or something.) Jon Stewart cracked up. Ben Affleck seems to have unobjectionable politics and I don't think he's racist or anything, but moments like that just...they seem to delimit their audience to people for whom x ethnic group is a curiosity.

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 16:51 (eighteen years ago)

like it would really be identifying against myself a little too much to find the way my parents talk funny, you know?

fair enough...i don't have to consider race when people do an Irish accent which sounds a bit like my Grandad and what have you. but people can and do mock accents on this basic level where it's about things like tone and cadence...and arguably as celebratory as it could be deemed derogatory. i've always thought of Apu - and any Indian voice in The Simpsons ("make us proud, Son...", "Approach, my sons...") in this category - even when no actual joke is being made or based on the accent. beyond the initial set-up for Apu i don't think he's ever been depicted as inferior in any way in the show, tho i haven't really watched it for a few years now.

your Ben Affleck example does sound weird tho and yeah things like that which don't seem to have the right context behind them do seem rather mor dubious.

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:05 (eighteen years ago)

Finding an accent funny in itself (as in Affleck's use of the popular "comedy Indian accent"), often isn't racist in the classic sense -- it doesn't betray any notion of racial superiority/inferiority, and it doesn't actively seek to oppress, humiliate, discriminate. It's insensitive. Perhaps ignorant. But I have a hard time with the tendency to slap the word "racist" on anything that fails to be perfectly PC with regard to race.

I mean, that's what got me into trouble on the Idiocracy thread. If I hadn't used the word "racist", the discussion probably would have gone a lot more smoothly.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:06 (eighteen years ago)

it's not really my intention to say, these instances where people put on an Indian accent are dubious. I would sincerely like to know more about what people are laughing at when they're laughing at them. (Apu doesn't count--he's not an instance of Indian-ness is inheretly funny humor.)

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:07 (eighteen years ago)

much funnier is hearing how Naveen Andrews (Sayid in Lost) talks in real life anyway!

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:08 (eighteen years ago)

also, xpost to way upthread, The Office is smarter and funnier about Indian identity than any other cultural product I've ever encountered. and I'm totally obsessed with Mindy Kaling.

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:10 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/38968
Chinese Laundry Owner Blasted For Reinforcing Negative Ethnic Stereotypes
April 1, 1998 | Issue 33•12

SAN FRANCISCO—Second-generation Chinese-American laundry owner Raymond Chen is under heavy fire this week from Bay Area activists who call him "an insulting caricature that perpetuates long-outdated, grossly prejudiced images of Asian Americans."

Activists are calling Raymond Chen, a Chinese American who owns a laundry shop and speaks with an accent, "a grossly offensive racial stereotype."
"It's frightening to think that, in 1998, some of us still haven't moved beyond the century-old stereotype of Chinese people as laundrymen," said Abigail Huber-Henson, a University of California at Berkeley cultural-studies professor and director of the Race Action Project, the campus group spearheading the crusade against Chen. "This man is a degrading anachronism that has no place in a supposedly enlightened society like ours. To meet him is to be directly confronted with America's shameful history of racism."

Added Huber-Henson: "We should no more tolerate this than we would a Pakistani convenience-store owner or a Jewish lawyer."

An extensive anti-Chen public-awareness campaign, including petitions, rallies, and letters to city and state officials, has already reduced business at the embattled Chen Chinese Laundry by 40 percent. Chen, 33, said he is puzzled by the strong reaction to him and his business.

"I do not understand why all these people hate me," Chen told reporters. "I run a good laundry. My family has owned and operated this business for nearly 60 years. I grew up here in this neighborhood. We do dry cleaning, starching, pressing–everything you need, no problem. We have good prices and even do emergency rush jobs for only small additional fee. I have done nothing wrong."

The controversy is expected to heat up Friday, when hearings begin at San Francisco City Hall. The hearings, which are expected to last several weeks due to the long list of academics and activists who wish to speak out against Chen, will determine if his presence in the community can be prosecuted under local "hate crime" statutes. Chen's opponents argue that the launderer should be ruled a violation of San Francisco's anti-hate-speech municipal code, established in 1990 to guarantee persons of color a living environment free of "offensive and emotionally damaging racial language or imagery." If convicted, Chen could face fines of up to $20,000 and up to 15 months in prison, as well as mandatory attendance at anti-racism workshops.


Enlarge Image
An anti-Chen rally in San Francisco.
"As long as Chen is allowed to continue this grotesque and derogatory display, we cannot consider the Bay Area a 'safe space' for Asian Americans," Huber-Henson said. "His cartoonish, insultingly narrow depiction of Asian Americans makes him, in effect, a cultural terrorist, wreaking untold damage to the self-esteem of millions of minority citizens. We demand that these people–who are human beings, just like you and me—be treated with the dignity they deserve."

Chen has responded to the controversy surrounding him with a series of local television spots, paid for out of his own pocket, in which he pleads his case to the community.

"Why is everyone so mad at me?" Chen says in one of the spots. "Because of how I talk? I was born in America, but I was raised in Chinese-speaking home. English is second language to me. Most of my friends and neighbors speak Chinese as their main language, too. There are many Americans who speak languages that are not English."

The 30-second spots have only intensified opposition to Chen. Said Janet Dundee, a sociology professor at UC-Berkeley: "Did you see those television ads? It's like seeing Charlie Chan up there on the screen, talking about his 'honable numbah won son' and saying, 'Pleasah, beg forgivaness.' Frankly, I am stunned that the local television stations would permit the broadcast of such blatantly racist material."

Though the potential penalties facing Chen are harsh, some believe they do not go far enough.

"With prejudice and intolerance still rampant in our society, anti-hate-speech codes are an important first step," said Beverly White, director of the San Mateo-based Stop Racism Now. "However, putting Chen in jail for 15 months is not going to erase the pain he has caused the countless Asian Americans he has mocked and insulted. The real issue here is so much bigger than just one man. No enlightened society should allow stereotypes like Chen to exist at all."

White then outlined her group's long-range goal to get legislation passed that would authorize the forced relocation of all ethnic stereotypes to internment camps in the California desert.

deej, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:13 (eighteen years ago)

When we laugh at the comedy Indian accent, we're laughing at the basic humor of difference. A lot of humor is based on the fact that certain things are weird, different, thus funny. Remember grade school? Weirdos get laughed at. Comical accents get mocked.

In grade school, the mockery is uncivilized, hostile. The more genteel, adult humor of The Simpsons doesn't go in for that kind of stuff, except with regard to fat white losers like the Comic Book Guy. So, when Apu's voice is presented as funny (and the inherent funnyness of Apu's voice seems to be a HUGE part of the humor of the character to a lot of viewers) he's not being directly denigrated. Infantilized, perhaps. Made silly. But not ostracized and humiliated.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:14 (eighteen years ago)

I think you're mischaracterizing what's funny about Apu.

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:14 (eighteen years ago)

thanks confucious

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:15 (eighteen years ago)

xxpost

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:16 (eighteen years ago)

inasmuch, though, that you're right and that kind of humor relies merely on, hey, this is different, I think it's fairly lazy humor.

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:17 (eighteen years ago)

(to Pye Poudre)

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:17 (eighteen years ago)

PS Apu is interesting 'cuz he combines the humor of difference (speaks with funny accent) with the humor of familiarity (all convenience stores are owned by Indians). Both suspect, both potentially racist humor forms, but softened in this case by self-awareness and affection.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:17 (eighteen years ago)

he's also micharacterizing the meaning of the words "genteel" and "infantalize"

Tracer Hand, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:17 (eighteen years ago)

what are you talking about? what's funny about Apu are the funny things he says and the funny things people say to/about him. Simpsons was pretty much the best-written show on TV at some point.

(to Pye Poudre)

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:20 (eighteen years ago)

also, I think nabisco and Ethan pretty much established in the Ronaldinho thread that "affection" is no guard against racism.

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:20 (eighteen years ago)

"You ducks are really trying my patience!

But you're sooooo cute!"


funny in any voice really, but particularly Apu's perhaps?

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:22 (eighteen years ago)

"I think you're mischaracterizing what's funny about Apu."

I'm only talking about part of the picture. The accent and convenience-store-ownership are just the most superficial, obvious gags that Apu presents. And I don't think either is particularly funny. But I've known a lot of white people who think it's the funniest thing in the world to talk like Apu. "Hee, hee, hee! He talks funny talk."

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)

mindy kaling is my favorite person on television

and what on Friday, March 23, 2007 7:30 AM (3 hours ago)


:D

gbx, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)

well, fuck those people.

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:24 (eighteen years ago)

xpost

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:24 (eighteen years ago)

horseshoe you are a traet

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:26 (eighteen years ago)

But I've known a lot of white people who think it's the funniest thing in the world to talk like Apu.

Well I bet they're all talking like Borat now.

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)

thanks! you're the best writer on ILX.

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)

ethan 8080

gbx, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)

xpost to Ethan.

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)

Genteel: Refined in manner; well-bred and polite. Free from vulgarity or rudeness.
Infantilize: To treat or condescend to as if still a young child.

I'm using the words properly. I'm curious as to what you might imagine they mean...

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)

This might get me in trouble, but I think there's something about the musicality in the Indian accent that contributes to its funniness among non-Indians. In the same way that words that begin with "k" are automatically funny.

jaymc, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:29 (eighteen years ago)

Sacha Baron-Cohen's natural voice is quite boring tho (soft fairly posh North London) tho so no wonder he invented Ali G, Borat and that fashion dude.

Same applies to Matt Lucas and David Walliams really. The only difference is that they don't play on racial stereotypes (but they do love exaggerated voices/accents generally).

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:30 (eighteen years ago)

i don't think an accent's 'musicality' is funny, though. if anything, it just makes it interesting and enjoyable to listen to. c.f. welsh accents

gbx, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:31 (eighteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_English#Phonology_of_Indian_English

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:32 (eighteen years ago)

enjoyable but not funny?

it's not a great leap from one to the other is it.

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:33 (eighteen years ago)

but i just sort of like accents, in general

gbx, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:33 (eighteen years ago)

which Simpsons character has the least funny voice?

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:34 (eighteen years ago)

this thread = ethan OTM

(altho I also wanted to add that I too have experienced the inability to stop the head-bobbling thing upon returning from India - and whenever I see anybody doing it it warms my lil heart)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:34 (eighteen years ago)

I find Welsh accents VERY VERY funny generally.

Of course English people often try and do Welsh accents but they come out sounding more like exaggerated Indian or Pakistani accents...

blueski, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:35 (eighteen years ago)

re: musicality I remember a line in White Noise where Jack and Babette talk about how beautiful their Indian dentist's voice is. that was the first time where I felt like I understood how a non-Indian might encounter an Indian accent, like I took it seriously. I think that it helped that it was put so positively (DeLillo has a genius for that, for loving difference.)

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:36 (eighteen years ago)

(I am enjoying this thread and learning from it - thank you all. That is not sarcasm.)

Jenny, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:37 (eighteen years ago)

and in terms of intelligently dealing with race: King of the Hill > Simpsons >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Borat

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:38 (eighteen years ago)

pye so you're saying the simpsons are "free from vulgarity and rudeness"?

and that "to condescend to as if still a young child" isn't humiliating?

Tracer Hand, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:38 (eighteen years ago)

and in terms of intelligently dealing with race: King of the Hill > Simpsons >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Borat

texas vs oregon vs england lol

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:39 (eighteen years ago)

i mean i don't feel one way or the other about what you're trying to say, mainly because i can't understand it, because i think you're sort of confused about it, and these contradictions are a symptom of that

Tracer Hand, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:39 (eighteen years ago)

xpost

Tracer Hand, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:40 (eighteen years ago)

and ethan's wikipedia link otm=there are a lot of Indian accents and the comedy Indian accent is a distorted version of only one of them. but I trust everyone knows that.

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:43 (eighteen years ago)

No, my point is that the humor of difference to be found on The Simpsons is (genrally) more genteel than what you'd find on a third-grade playground at recess.

And that the infantilizing quality of Apu's "funny accent" is subtle. While troubling, it's more affectionate than mean-spirited.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:45 (eighteen years ago)

See also Naveed in Still Game (the half-a-dozen Britishers on this thread at any rate, most of whom, I think, have expressed some liking for it). He has the exaggerated accent, the fat-belly-under-belt thing, the cornershop (and propensity to rip people off in it), the subservient wife who remains hidden from view in the back of the store (and doesn't speak English despite having been in Glasgow since the 70s), etc. He's also funny as fuck and gets most of the best lines. Mind you, I'm pretty sure there haven't been any characters who ever make an issue of his background in the show, despite him ticking lots of the stereotype boxes.

I'm not sure what my point is here.

ailsa, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)

"i mean i don't feel one way or the other about what you're trying to say, mainly because i can't understand it, because i think you're sort of confused about it, and these contradictions are a symptom of that"

Gotcha, tracer. In my first post, I tried to show how confusion and doublethink are an inextricable part of how my brain processes arguments about "race". So, you're probably right. If you'd explain what isn't clear, maybe I could clarify?

FWIW, I'm not making any kind of large rhetorical point. Just trying to explorethe ideas raised.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:54 (eighteen years ago)

The point of Ailsa's comment is that this is a kind of racial/ethnic stereotyping that we're comfortable with -- both Americans and "Britishers".

And I think that's interesting in itself.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:57 (eighteen years ago)

Same applies to Matt Lucas and David Walliams really. The only difference is that they don't play on racial stereotypes (but they do love exaggerated voices/accents generally).


http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40999000/jpg/_40999678_dudley2_300bbc.jpg

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40999000/jpg/_40999712_bubbles1_416bbc.jpg

acrobat, Friday, 23 March 2007 17:57 (eighteen years ago)

was that really necessary?

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:01 (eighteen years ago)

god, the morning comedy crew on the hip hop station here busted into some really nasty shit about sanjaya on american idol, indian call centers skewing the votes, "hello yes america you vote for sanjaya ok thank you bye bye" it's not just apu, tho it's kind of funny that's what we're talking about, mostly!

gff, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:02 (eighteen years ago)

Naveed in Still Game
Eh? By that measure Goodness Gracious Me is racist! T/S black people saying "nigger" versus white people.

.stet., Friday, 23 March 2007 18:03 (eighteen years ago)

yeah a morning call crew is definitely a great judge of american culture and is the yard stick which we should measure our intellectual wangs by.

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:04 (eighteen years ago)

haha "intellectual wangs"

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:07 (eighteen years ago)

yes actually i do think a morning radio show is a pretty good barometer of what america is like.

gff, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:09 (eighteen years ago)

"it's not just apu, tho it's kind of funny that's what we're talking about, mostly!"

Well Apu IS the most visible and enduring Indian character in American popular culture.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:13 (eighteen years ago)

This isn't nearly as entertaining as the bottle-opener thread.

when that fire gets stoked, flame-outs occur, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:14 (eighteen years ago)

Agree with GFF, to a certain point. Morning radio shows don't represent the attitudes of every individual American, and they certainly don't paint our nation in the most flattering light, but they provide a half-decent barometer of what a good chunk of the "mainstream" responds to.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:15 (eighteen years ago)

so let's see. they provide a "half decent" barometer, they "don't represent the attitudes of every American," but we should look to them to know Where We Are As A Country? This is what you are saying?

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:16 (eighteen years ago)

The fact that we USAians don't riot at the abject stupidity of morning radio shows suggests an implicit, if not approval, than at least tolerance of that shallow, one-dimensional, idiotic world view. So I agree that it's a reasonable barometer, whether we like it o rnot.

Jenny, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:17 (eighteen years ago)

b-b-but Sanjeev Kohli doesn't write all his lines! And he writes some of the taking-the-piss-out-of-Scottish-stereotypes lines. If a character of ANY background is well-enough written, I don't want to have to give a fuck who wrote it.

(there's not enough discussion of non-comedic portrayal here, btw, where you have even less ability to dismiss things as not getting it)

xxxpost to stet

ailsa, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:19 (eighteen years ago)

Well Apu IS the most visible and enduring Indian character in American popular culture.

http://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/tburke1/montalban.jpghttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/35/Streetfighter_dhalsim_illust.png/180px-Streetfighter_dhalsim_illust.png

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)

(note to twin cities ilxors: yes i have just admitted to listening to the tone e fly morning show. shit is pretty funny sorry!)

gff, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)

ricardo's in better shape than dhalsim there

gff, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:22 (eighteen years ago)

And he writes some of the taking-the-piss-out-of-Scottish-stereotypes lines.
He's Scottish!

If a character of ANY background is well-enough written, I don't want to have to give a fuck who wrote it.
You kinda have to. If BBC London had made Rab C Nesbitt, with an all-English cast (using accents) and an all-English script team, would it have been remotely acceptable?

.stet., Friday, 23 March 2007 18:25 (eighteen years ago)

yes ethan, a sci-fi villain of vague and innacurate ethnic heritage (a Sikh from the 25th century who cuts his hair?) and a video game character are on equal footing with the most popular cartoon in American history. I think there's some vast scale of difference there.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:26 (eighteen years ago)

Que:

It's a big country. Multitudes contained. No one thing could ever encapsulate it. So when we're talking about the way that non-symbolic things "represent" the country, we're not pretending that they offer an accurate and complete picture. Only that they shed a bit of light on a something culturally significant.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:27 (eighteen years ago)

21st century u n00b

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:27 (eighteen years ago)

Wait America is a big country? WTF? Shit, I forgot about the whole purchasing the State of Louisiana from Napoleon thing. My bad.

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:28 (eighteen years ago)

i imagine you sneering as you spit out 'sci fi' and 'videogame'

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:29 (eighteen years ago)

i'll be sure to inform americans that those things dont actually count as pop culture

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:29 (eighteen years ago)

DEAR BRITISHERS

THANKS TO THOMAS JEFFERSON, WE"RE GOING TO KICK YOUR ASS IN THE FUR AND TRAPPER TRADES.

LOVE

USA

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:30 (eighteen years ago)

omg ethan beat me to pwning shakey

Catsupppppppppppppp dude ‫茄蕃‪, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:33 (eighteen years ago)

wtf dood I'm a huge sci-fi nerd and you know it! But Khan and that Street Fighter guy /= Apu in terms of cultural exposure. but if you want something to fight about, this seems like an appropriately inconsequential point to argue.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:36 (eighteen years ago)

(especially when I doubt most viewers of Wrath of Khan would even recognize Khan as Indian - given that all his ethnic signifiers are completely convoluted and innacurate)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:38 (eighteen years ago)

wtf dood I'm a huge sci-fi nerd and you know it!


NO CRED. 25th century, lol

Catsupppppppppppppp dude ‫茄蕃‪, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)

i bet dude had to look on wikipedia to find out khan's last name

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:41 (eighteen years ago)

Que:

"Shit, I forgot about the whole purchasing the State of Louisiana from Napoleon thing. My bad."

Yeah, I know. It always looks pretty small out the window...

But WTF? I don't get where you're coming from. I thought you objected to the idea that morning radio shows could be taken as representative of American attitudes 'cuz, "they don't represent everybody." So, I pointed out that nothing ever represents everybody. And now you're goofing on the obviousness of my response. Fine. CAN NOT WIN.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:42 (eighteen years ago)

I'm goofing on your stupid name.

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:42 (eighteen years ago)

i love that proof hes not sikh cuz of no beard instead of, i dunno, being a genocidal militaristic space-tyrant??

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:42 (eighteen years ago)

Just kdding. FREE TIBET!

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:43 (eighteen years ago)

i bet dude had to look on wikipedia to find out khan's last name

you don't know me very well

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:44 (eighteen years ago)

How old is shakey mo?

Catsupppppppppppppp dude ‫茄蕃‪, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:45 (eighteen years ago)

"I'm goofing on your stupid name."

Will look good on Roffles thread. Congrats.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:48 (eighteen years ago)

I've probably seen Wrath of Khan once for every year ethan's been alive

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:48 (eighteen years ago)

This thread is starting to be fun. Glad I started it now!

tom, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:48 (eighteen years ago)

NERD FITE

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:49 (eighteen years ago)

reverse polarity!

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:49 (eighteen years ago)

The Sikh aren't a genocidal militaristic space-tyrants? WTF is that the Koreans then?

when that fire gets stoked, flame-outs occur, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:50 (eighteen years ago)

Yes.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:51 (eighteen years ago)

indian-americans are supposed to be the wealthiest ethnic group in the US

gabbneb, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:51 (eighteen years ago)

though i imagine the numbers are skewed significantly by the silicon valley cohort

gabbneb, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:53 (eighteen years ago)

? WTF is that the Koreans then?

http://pr0n.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/5/55/Police.gif
Khan Noonien Singh is not to be confused with Noonien Soong, the scientist who created the android Data in Star Trek: The Next Generation. The characters' names have the same origin (they were both named by Gene Roddenberry), and an episode of Star Trek: Enterprise has hinted at some link between the characters beyond a coincidental name similarity.

http://pr0n.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/5/55/Police.gif

Catsupppppppppppppp dude ‫茄蕃‪, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:53 (eighteen years ago)

Somebody put a wallet in my mouth before I swallow my tongue.

when that fire gets stoked, flame-outs occur, Friday, 23 March 2007 18:56 (eighteen years ago)

in what way is apu stereotypical beyond speaking with an accent and working in a kwik-e-mart (a stereotype that might not exist were it not for apu)? sure, he's a cartoon character, but, you know, he's a cartoon character.

we talked about Apu before on another thread about how disappointed I was when they made him a father with 8 kids because although it may not have been recognised in the States, it felt like pandering to nasty stereotypes in the UK re Asians with big families

not a stereotype in the States as far as I know and why would they pander to a UK stereotype?

Carl, the token black guy, and how he is basically a blank-slate cipher with no discernable "funny" traits

and he's far from the only black character who's less, er, fleshed-out probably for fear of offense. dr burke perhaps? but it also may be that writers want to make black characters boring/serious.

gabbneb, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:02 (eighteen years ago)

Carl and Lenny are FOILS for Homer. Take one 8th grade literature class guys!

Catsupppppppppppppp dude ‫茄蕃‪, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:04 (eighteen years ago)

not a stereotype in the States as far as I know and why would they pander to a UK stereotype?
Like was pointed out really well on the bottle opener thread, it doesn't really matter what the intentions are, if the results are racist, does it?

.stet., Friday, 23 March 2007 19:05 (eighteen years ago)

who the fuck is dr burke??? stick to garrison keilor homie

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:07 (eighteen years ago)

hahahaha

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:07 (eighteen years ago)

who the fuck is dr burke???

a character on the #1 show on television

gabbneb, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:12 (eighteen years ago)

hahaha Dr. Burke is the guy from Grey's Anatomy, I had to google it. Do all black people look alike to you, gabnebb?

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/07/04/greys_narrowweb__300x400,0.jpg

http://www.geocities.com/myndir2004/hibbert.jpg

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:12 (eighteen years ago)

no one is talking about your stupid yuppie doctor show gabbneb.

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:13 (eighteen years ago)

does gabbneb have a vagina

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:15 (eighteen years ago)

in what way is apu stereotypical beyond speaking with an accent and working in a kwik-e-mart?

-- gabbneb

thick accent
illegal alien
arranged marriage
huge family
rips people off(? not sure on that one but I think he's been known to pull a few strokes)
cornershop
huge unpronounceable surname

I think his Hinduism has been the butt of a few gags too but I can't remember them off the top of my head.


-- onimo, from a few posts back

Omnimo OTM. Superficially, Apu is a collection of lazy stereotypes. Not all harmful or derogatory, but stereotypes nontheless. This seems intentional. As veiwers, we're supposed to notice how stereotypical the characterization is. This set up the real punchline: he's also one of the show's most likeable characters. The Simpsons uses superficial stereotypes only to subvert them -- revealing that this seemingly racist charicature is actually a complex human being.

I think this is why The Simpsons gets away with it. Because, on a certain level, the show isn't really mocking Asians. It's mocking and eventually subverting common stereotypes about Asians. That's what's great about The Simpsons: it assumes an intelligent viewer. The writers figure you will recognize Apu not as a joke at the expense of Asians, but of stereotypically "ethnic" television characters.

The problem (if it is a problem) is that the writers want to have it both ways. They seem to justify themselves in the fashion described above, but can't resist some plain ol' fashion laffs at the furriner with the funny accent. The message might be less confused if it weren't a white dude doing the voice...

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:26 (eighteen years ago)

working in a kwik-e-mart (a stereotype that might not exist were it not for apu)

? are you serious?

tremendoid, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)

its so racist that apu is hindu

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:30 (eighteen years ago)

guys what about Cookie Kwan

http://www.simpsonspark.com/images/whitepages/kwan_cookie.jpg

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:31 (eighteen years ago)

i guess i don't watch the simpsons enough, though i've watched enough that this - It's mocking and eventually subverting common stereotypes about Asians. That's what's great about The Simpsons: it assumes an intelligent viewer. The writers figure you will recognize Apu not as a joke at the expense of Asians, but of stereotypically "ethnic" television characters. - is obviously true. but i disagree with this - That's what's great about The Simpsons: it assumes an intelligent viewer. The writers figure you will recognize Apu not as a joke at the expense of Asians, but of stereotypically "ethnic" television characters. . while there are ironic nods to the 'intelligent' viewer, i do think it's directed at americans who might hold (or hear about, more likely) the stereotypes.

? are you serious?

yeah

gabbneb, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:38 (eighteen years ago)

being allowed to laff at asians and fats mitigates pain caused by blacks and gays getting all "touchy"

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:38 (eighteen years ago)

whoops. strike that second quoted sentence in the first part.

gabbneb, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:38 (eighteen years ago)

the Indian-owns-a-convenient-store thing precedes Apu.

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:39 (eighteen years ago)

it sure does.

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)

apropos of nothing really, but the convenient store thing makes me think of it, Harold and Kumar is a great movie and very smart about race in America.

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)

multiple xposts, no doubt:
in the U.S. at least, illegal aliening and big family aren't indian stereotypes per se (big tight extended family would make the grade but Apu isn't burdened with that), and ripping people off would be a function of his convenience store ownership, not an essentialist stereotype that would apply to, say, Jewish people, if one were to split hairs. I think Dom's point about switching latinos for indians in U.K./U.S. is one of the most interesting ones on the thread but it isn't doing a service to the apu discussion. When are we gonna get to East Asians? The sexless/invisible East Asian male in media is probably the biggest sin of omission going right now.

tremendoid, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)

also i don't think the nods in the Simpsons are ironic but that's another time and another place. the Simpsons writers are well aware that they appeal to all walks of life.

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)

duh, but did it rise to the level of a stereotype?

gabbneb, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)

yes, gabbneb!

Mr. Que, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)

exception to sexless/invisible East Asian male=Harold and Kumar!

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:42 (eighteen years ago)

i was gonna raise mira nair but she's not a significant cultural force or anything - not too many people saw mississippi masala for denzel, rite?

gabbneb, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:42 (eighteen years ago)

I love Mira Nair, but not sure she's relevant? she is awesome, though.

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:43 (eighteen years ago)

she's giving kal penn his first leading man role? though that probably would have happened without her help.

gabbneb, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:45 (eighteen years ago)

also i don't think the nods in the Simpsons are ironic but

yeah, i was too lazy to come up with a more accurate term

gabbneb, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:46 (eighteen years ago)

Ian....Horatio Sanz
Lead singer....Cameron Diaz
Girl #1....Rachel Dratch
Girl #2....Maya Rudolph
Girl #3....Tina Fey
Girl #4....Amy Poehler


Ian: Salutations, my sheep-like followers! I'm Ian, and this is MTV4! That's right, MTV4! MTV4 is so hip and underground; you can't call your local cable company to get it. You just turn on your TV, and if it's there, well, you must be cool enough. All right, if you're looking at me right now that means that MTV4 picked you! So congratulations or whatever. Today on our World Music Showcase, we feature a band called...eeerrkch...Crash Papayas! They're chicks, and they're Japanese, and they're super-duper underground. So don't turn your front and lie that you've heard 'em, because you haven't, suckas! Give it up for Crash Papayas!

(All members of the group giggle)

Crash Papayas: Thank you, thank you.

Lead Singer: One Two Three!

(Crazy music starts)

Lead singer: Peaches On My Eyes!

All members: Go To Bed!

Lead Singer: Rough Dogs have Bumps!

All members: Go to bed!

Lead Singer: Bad Gutless Purse!

All Members: Orange Smile!

Lead Singer: Disposable Weather Cock!

(Music stops)

(All members giggle)

All members: Omi gato, thank you.

Girl #2: Next song very romantic.

Lead Singer: Up yours! OKAY? One Two Three Faaa!

(Crazy music starts)

Lead Singer: Raw Egg Biscuit Factory!

All Members: NOOO!

Lead Singer: Chipped Stew on the Wall!

All Members: NOOO!

Lead Singer: Pink Purple Green Yellow!

All Members: RARR!

Lead Singer: Bad Angel Why You So Bad?

All Members: OY!

(Music stops)

(All members giggle)

Crash Papaya: Thank you, thank you.

Girl #1: Next song is cover.

Girl #2: Oak-a-ridge-boys-eh. El-el-el...

All Members: Elvira. Elvira!!

Lead singer: Dedicated to New York Citayyy!

All Members: Go Yankees. Go Yankees!!

Girl #1: Nobody beats de Wiz.

Lead Singer: Up yours! OKAY? One Two Three Faaa!

(Crazy music starts)

All Members: Aaaaaaaaaahh...

(Music stops)

All members: Elvira!

All Members: Giddy Up. Thank you. Omi gato.

Ian: Wow! Your sound is so new and hot, if I tried to put it into words, I'd explode!

Lead Singer: Very good.

Ian: So, it's your first visit to the United States. What do you guys plan to do?

Lead Singer: Hot Dog!

Girl #2: um...Suitcase!

Girl #3: Hand Lotion!

Lead Singer: America's funniest videos!

Girl #(?): A white castle, sulky Chan, au calamite. Go down the Rolla coaster. (??)

Ian: Okay...good luck with that. Well, I hope you kick ass on your American tour! Hey, who directed your new video?

Lead singer: Sean.uh.Puffy...Combs.

Girl #3: No, no! Sean John!

Girl #2: No P. Diddy!

All Members: P. Diddy!! P.Diddy!!

Ian: Great! You’re watching MTV4 and. (looks at watch)...we're not cool anymore. MTV4 is done; we're shutting it down! All right! Maybe we'll see you on MTV5!!

All Members: Bye!!

Catsupppppppppppppp dude ‫茄蕃‪, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:46 (eighteen years ago)

the most offensive thing about that sketch is that it stars Horatio Sanz

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 23 March 2007 19:47 (eighteen years ago)

i chilled horatio sanz at the strip club & he was a bro

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:00 (eighteen years ago)

chilled with!! WITH

and what, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:01 (eighteen years ago)

Either way...

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)

I just wanted to agree that Harold & Kumar is great on many levels

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)

Starbucks never portray Asian people negatively in their adverts.

I shut up now.

gatinhaaa, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:07 (eighteen years ago)

i like Rehha Sharma, from BSG.

http://greymattermedia.com/prisoners/images/RekhaSharmaHead.jpg

who is pretty and may or may not be a cylon.

kingfish, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:09 (eighteen years ago)

Let's not turn this into "Here are a list of SEAsian women I'd like to nail".

Dom Passantino, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:12 (eighteen years ago)

Mainly because my postcount for the month is far too fucking high as it is.

Dom Passantino, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:12 (eighteen years ago)

Are we going to get into Ajay Naidu's character in Office Space now?

Michael Bolton: Uh, yeah, well, I work at Initech and I don't consider myself a pussy, OK?
Samir: Yes, I am also not a pussy.

kingfish, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:15 (eighteen years ago)

aw Samir gets a lot of great lines in OS!

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:17 (eighteen years ago)

Office Space is another movie that's smart about race.

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:18 (eighteen years ago)

It's hard for me to remember really early Simpsons seasons, but by just a few years in, most race jokes involving Apu tended to be about his dignified exasperation with other people being morons -- e.g., when his religion is described as "other" and he says "I'm Hindu, there are nearly a billion of us."

I think the big US/UK difference in representation is not only that the UK has a much more significant subcontinental population, but also that you guys are well past the point where lots and lots of those people are British-born and integrated into society and really very well maybe "just like white British people, with only skin color setting them apart" or whatever was said up there. Whereas I think the US is just getting to that transition over the past years. Up until some point in the 80s, the image of people from the subcontinent would definitely be as an immigrant population, including lots of urban clusters in "stereotypical" new-immigrant jobs (like cab driving or whatever) -- but very shortly after that, for TONS of younger people, the main face of, say, Indians mostly involves the children of middle-class immigrants dotted around suburbs and totally integrated into America. Which is more the Harold and Kumar vision, and most anyone that age that goes to college is going to be completely used to seeing Indians that way. (Cf the same transition in thinking/expectations/stereotypes of East Asians happening a lot earlier.)

(In fact even way pre-Kumar teen movies integrated that kind of role into them, though often in kind of a goofy way -- like it's not a coincidence that Harold is the uptight one and Kumar's depicted as the weirdo instigator -- or often in terms of kids of immigrants being wealthy/fancy, like the "Persian mafia" in Clueless. Anyway point being young Americans have totally grown up for a while now not feeling TOO much difference between themselves and the children of immigrants their parents would think of as distinctly foreign.)

nabisco, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:40 (eighteen years ago)

most race jokes involving Apu tended to be about his dignified exasperation with other people being morons

"Please do not try to feed peanuts to my god!"

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)

and most anyone that age that goes to college is going to be completely used to seeing Indians that way.

yeah

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:44 (eighteen years ago)

I think Apu's first big central role in an episode in the Simpsons was the one where he moves into the Simpsons' house and then takes Homer to India to meet the Quik-E-Mart guru...?

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:44 (eighteen years ago)

(Season 3, I think?)

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:45 (eighteen years ago)

Actually a lot of the Apu episodes are pretty interestingly about immigrant-experience and assimilation and stuff -- like the one about his marriage, and all his dating around Springfield beforehand!

Ha, this is just reminding me of Snake and Apu in couples therapy --

SNAKE: Sometimes I'm robbing you and it's like you're not even there.
APU: That is because you're robbing my brother Sanjay!

(Sanjay is the ultimate unexplored minor Simpsons character!)

nabisco, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)

"Crash Papayas" OMG Melt Banana are officially Big Time.

nickalicious, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:56 (eighteen years ago)

personal fave is the short "The Jolly Bengali" - "I'm going to party like its on sale for $19.99!"

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 20:58 (eighteen years ago)

You know, I'd also note that people from the Indian subcontinent in American film and television are disproportionately portrayed as ... well, doctors, probably even above "store owner" or "cab driver" (or "computer programmer / tech support"). Even outside of medical-themed stuff, where it's just realistic to have immigrants around (E.R.), people seem to pretty readily associate "Indian" and "doctor" (for immigrants as well as first-generation children).

nabisco, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:02 (eighteen years ago)

cf awesome hospital/daddy-the-doctor bit in Harold & Kumar.

("marijuana? but... why?")

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:03 (eighteen years ago)

Daddy's not coming on anything!

nickalicious, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:08 (eighteen years ago)

Stereotypical depictions of East Asians (American):

1) Cab drivers in turbans. Irascible
2) Convenience store owners. Greedy. Funny voices
3) Potential scary terrorists. Allah akbar!
4) Young geeky males in IT. Oversexed.
6) Hindoos worship cows. Hee-hee.

No female depiction to speak of. Wife and mother. Nose ring, bindhi, sari. Perhaps an attractive young woman in an executive position of some kind. Maybe a doctor? Sharply dressed. Only vaguely threatening.

Stereotypical depiction of other Asians (American)

1) Kooky young woman. Deranged. Hella sexy.
2a) Young man who knows things about computers. Useful. Glasses.
2b) Young man obsessed by distasteful fetish. Sweaty forehead. Glasses.
3) Executive-class dragon lady. Extremely threatening. But still sexy.
4) Sadistic villian. Hatches nefarious plans. Tattoos?
5) They have panties in vending machines. Hee-hee.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:08 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah and the East Asian doctor thing is big. Good point.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:10 (eighteen years ago)

Harold and Kumar REALLY knows what it's doing in terms of dealing with upper-middle-class children-of-immigrants stuff. Subtly and deftly, even -- one of my favorite examples being Harold's relationship with the Asian students' club.

I mean geez, the basic character thrust of the movie is about two different modes of being a child of immigrants -- burdened by all expectations vs. totally abandoning them -- at the end of which the burdened one learns to assert himself and the slacker one decides to go to med school like his dad wants.

nabisco, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:11 (eighteen years ago)

Umm I'm assuming you guys mean south and central Asians, not EAST -- I have yet to come across any turbaned Korean terrorists in my TV viewing.

nabisco, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:12 (eighteen years ago)

often in terms of kids of immigrants being wealthy/fancy, like the "Persian mafia" in Clueless

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tehrangeles

gabbneb, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:12 (eighteen years ago)

Indians are "East Asians"?

jaymc, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:12 (eighteen years ago)

Oh wait, my favorite subcontinental-descended character in recent years = KELLY on The Office. (Who is not only great as a character but sort of makes sense as a character type, too.)

nabisco, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)

who is the Indian actress with the stalker boyrfriend in 40-Year Old Virgin? She's great.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:16 (eighteen years ago)

(xpost yeah Gabbneb I know there are loads of Persians in LA -- it's not entirely limited to that, though, I think there's a larger stock-character type of the "fancy mid-eastern kids with cellphone belt-clips and gold bracelets and designer clothes and shiny cars" variety. It seems like kind of a mashup between realities about high-aspiring immigrant families and older, less-realistic stereotypes about oil money, or something.)

nabisco, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:18 (eighteen years ago)

xpost Shakey if I remember right she's the same one from The Office!

nabisco, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:18 (eighteen years ago)

MINDY KALING is her name and she fucking rules.

max, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:20 (eighteen years ago)

She's also a writer/producer on the Office. I was actually just watching the Diwali episode from this season, which is really great (esp. Angela--"I have to watch the shoes. They might get stolen.")

max, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:21 (eighteen years ago)

chick from 40 year old virgin

=>

http://www.aspecialthing.com/news/TheOffice_Kelly.jpg

http://imdb.com/name/nm1411676/

kingfish, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

5) They have panties in vending machines. Hee-hee.

Dude, if you're listing stereotypes of PEOPLE, please stick to that and don't confuse the issue by including stereotypes of CULTURE.

HI DERE, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

xpost.

kingfish, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:23 (eighteen years ago)

Ha, she wrote that play Matt & Ben that was put on in NYC a few years ago about the writing of Good Will Hunting.

max, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:24 (eighteen years ago)

It's the same chick--Office chick/40-Year-Old Virgin chick.

max, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:25 (eighteen years ago)

Oops, re: East Asians. Dumb. Meant South Asia. Thinking badly today.

Pye Poudre, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:32 (eighteen years ago)

MINDY KALING is her name and she fucking rules.

max on Friday, March 23, 2007 3:20 PM (6 minutes ago)


:D

gbx, Friday, 23 March 2007 21:32 (eighteen years ago)

hi ppl we already covered being in love with Mindy Kaling way upthread. gbx made out with her once, the lucky dog, etc.

horseshoe, Friday, 23 March 2007 22:27 (eighteen years ago)

I think there's a larger stock-character type of the "fancy mid-eastern kids with cellphone belt-clips and gold bracelets and designer clothes and shiny cars" variety

sure, but I'm not sure the somewhat Beverly Hills/Westwood-specific Clueless didn't have the local iranian community specifically in mind

gabbneb, Friday, 23 March 2007 22:35 (eighteen years ago)

I might as well use this thread to share one of the great discoveries of my life, which is that like 50% of what we consider "Indian accent" (comedy or otherwise) can be achieved just by holding your tongue farther back in your mouth than English-speakers do.

(Cf the mouth-secret to French, which is to pucker up kissy-style periodically throughout your speech.)

nabisco, Friday, 23 March 2007 22:53 (eighteen years ago)

http://i3.tinypic.com/3133ocl.png

BLASTOCYST, Friday, 23 March 2007 23:22 (eighteen years ago)

don't step to asian flavaz

Wrinklepaws, Saturday, 24 March 2007 03:56 (eighteen years ago)

in what way is apu stereotypical beyond speaking with an accent and working in a kwik-e-mart (a stereotype that might not exist were it not for apu)?

I don't really know what to say to this. I feel pretty certain I heard this stereotype (as well as the large families thing) often enough before The Simpsons. You've never seen e.g. David Lee Roth's "Yankee Rose" video ("Not if you were the laaaaaaaaaast immigrant grocer on EARTH! HONEY!!")?

What about the curry-flavoured Slushies episode? The show might have been just as easily lampooning Americans' resistance to something new and foreign but I can't help but think that many viewers were just laughing at Apu for thinking curry flavour would be a good thing in an American food.

When the show first became big, when I was in middle school, I just felt like Apu was pandering to a lot of the same kinds of stereotypes and jokes that I heard in class or on the yard. (FWIW I felt the same way, and maybe worse, about 'nerd' stereotypes of bright guys with glasses a la Steve Urkel etc.) horseshoe's points about Indians being funny for just being there resonates. (I remember a Grade 7 class erupting in laughter when I said I wanted to do my biography project on Gandhi. [Everyone had to say who their topic was.])

It's hard for me to really judge how problematic Apu is now, esp given that I haven't even watched much in ages. The octuplets thing always struck me as being an eccentric riff on the stereotype but it's not something that I could prove in any way obv. I can say that even the show itself has at least recognized that Apu is a stereotype of some sort in the episode with the bowling teams ("They begged me to join their team!") I also recognize that stereotypes are funny sometimes and they're pretty much the stock-in-trade of sitcoms. I don't think I could really argue that Apu is a worse stereotype than many other characters on the show. It's hard for me to say whether his exaggerated accent should bother me more than the exaggerated Canadian accents on South Park or That 70s Show (where the Manitoban border guards almost talk like they're Scottish.)

Sundar, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:20 (eighteen years ago)

gbx made out with her once, the lucky dog, etc.

??? story plz

kingfish, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:25 (eighteen years ago)

(If The Simpsons came out 18 yrs ago, I was 9 or 10 before The Simpsons so take that as you will.)

Sundar, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:28 (eighteen years ago)

Also, and this doesn't isn't meant to prove any point about anything, something I always found a little weird is: Is Apu even an Indian name? I don't know that much about many parts of India so it may be but I don't think I've heard it outside the show. I definitely know the name Appu (I have a cousin with this name) but it's pronounced "up-poo" with equal emphasis on both syllables not the way that even Apu pronounces his name. Is Apu just supposed to be an Americanization of this name (which isn't the most common Indian name at all and AFAIK is a Southern thing?)

Sundar, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:37 (eighteen years ago)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/52/The_Apu_Trilogy.jpg/200px-The_Apu_Trilogy.jpg

and what, Saturday, 24 March 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)

Oh, OK, thanks. It seems that's where Groening got the name for the character. Is it a common Bengali name then?

Sundar, Saturday, 24 March 2007 20:19 (eighteen years ago)

Harold and Kumar spoke to my white upper middle class college/post college experience more than any movie ever!!!

JW, Saturday, 24 March 2007 21:53 (eighteen years ago)

That's the thing about that movie! The main reason it annoys me that minorities in TV/film are always presented as either stereotypes/representatives or "just like white people" is that it is really not hard, given any kind of effort, to write characters who have recognizable cultural backgrounds but aren't solely defined by them. Harold, Kumar, Turk on Scrubs (as comedies go, Scrubs is pretty smart on this stuff) = good examples.

nabisco, Saturday, 24 March 2007 22:22 (eighteen years ago)

I mean, FFS I identified with getting roped into going to cultural student group events

also i like weed

JW, Sunday, 25 March 2007 00:13 (eighteen years ago)

Third movie can be Harold and Kumar Go See Lightning Bolt

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 25 March 2007 00:16 (eighteen years ago)

i identified with being from new jersey

max, Sunday, 25 March 2007 00:23 (eighteen years ago)

and with riding a cheetah

max, Sunday, 25 March 2007 00:23 (eighteen years ago)

I used to watch the price is right every tuesday lunchtime with a first generation indian indie rocker from the campus radio.

JW, Sunday, 25 March 2007 00:24 (eighteen years ago)

Mindy Kaling has an interview in this week's Onion, which makes her sound even more adorable, especially where she goes on about her SNL fandom, and ultimate dream of "going to SNL and falling in love with some writer on SNL, of getting married and living in New York."

kingfish, Wednesday, 4 April 2007 16:29 (eighteen years ago)

four years pass...

still reading this but so far it's pretty lol

“You can’t help but feel like there must be another way,” he explains over a bowl of phô. “It’s like, we’re being pitted against each other while there are kids out there in the Midwest who can do way less work and be in a garage band or something—and if they’re decently intelligent and work decently hard in school …”

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 23:31 (fourteen years ago)

it all could have been so simple... *throws SAT book out window, picks up guitar*

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 23:36 (fourteen years ago)

ahahhah

This is the implicit question that J. T. Tran has posed to a roomful of Yale undergraduates at a master’s tea at Silliman College. His answer is typically Asian: practice. Tran is a pickup artist who goes by the handle Asian Playboy. He travels the globe running “boot camps,” mostly for Asian male students, in the art of attraction. Today, he has been invited to Yale by the Asian-American Students Alliance.

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 23:42 (fourteen years ago)

http://nymag.com/print/?/news/features/asian-americans-2011-5/

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 23:44 (fourteen years ago)

oh yeah forgot to link thx for the assist

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 23:46 (fourteen years ago)

I really can't believe this guy is devoting a 10 paragraphs to explaining how PUAs work and how that's beneficial to asian american males

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 23:50 (fourteen years ago)

Raj, a 26-year-old Indian virgin,

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 23:51 (fourteen years ago)

he explains over a bowl of phô.

phở not phô.

it's time for the fish in the perculator (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 23:56 (fourteen years ago)

^^^ SS with the dunk

This, of course, was madness. A child of Asian immigrants born into the suburbs of New Jersey and educated at Rutgers cannot be a law unto himself. The only way to approximate this is to refuse employment, because you will not be bossed around by people beneath you, and shave your expenses to the bone, because you cannot afford more, and move into a decaying Victorian mansion in Jersey City, so that your sense of eccentric distinction can be preserved in the midst of poverty, and cut yourself free of every form of bourgeois discipline, because these are precisely the habits that will keep you chained to the mediocre fate you consider worse than death.

???

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Tuesday, 10 May 2011 23:56 (fourteen years ago)

And though the debate she sparked about Asian-American life has been of questionable value, we will need more people with the same kind of defiance, willing to push themselves into the spotlight and to make some noise, to beat people up, to seduce women, to make mistakes, to become entrepreneurs, to stop doggedly pursuing official paper emblems attesting to their worthiness, to stop thinking those scraps of paper will secure anyone’s happiness, and to dare to be interesting.

glad this guy is taking a stand for asian-american women everywhere http://dl.dropbox.com/u/9627011/emot-golfclap.gif

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:03 (fourteen years ago)

anyway probably not too many others out there that are interested in reading an 11 page article about the first world problems of mediocrely successful asian americans but I'm gonna come out and deem this article bullshit, thanks for your time everybody

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:12 (fourteen years ago)

cool man see you

cop a cute abdomen (gbx), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:13 (fourteen years ago)

fuckin lol forever at
What happens to all the Asian-American overachievers when the test-taking ends?

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:15 (fourteen years ago)

冷静的人看到你

cop a cute abdomen (gbx), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:15 (fourteen years ago)

do they have those asian pride/korean pride kiddie gangs on the east coast or is that a bay area thing

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:16 (fourteen years ago)

socal azns are a bay area thing but its spreading

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:20 (fourteen years ago)

in high school one of my friends tried to start an azn pryde thing and all our aim screennames had to begin with "AzN-nWo" which stood for azn new world order, I forgot what mine was tho

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:21 (fourteen years ago)

and move into a decaying Victorian mansion in Jersey City,

would totally live in a victorian mansion in jersey city...

iatee, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:22 (fourteen years ago)

if it weren't for bay area azn pride, i don't think we'd have late night sushi in Oakland, so ...

sarahel, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:23 (fourteen years ago)

I would get all o_O when I was younger and doing group projects if we were exchanging aim info and half the list was like SeXI_CHinki3-PrYDE

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:25 (fourteen years ago)

I still haven't read the whole article is living in a victorian mansion in jersey city supposed to be a good thing or a bad thing

iatee, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:25 (fourteen years ago)

reminds me of this (1:00)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-0ha0NlRNk

goole, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:26 (fourteen years ago)

er, something one of you said, reminded me of that.

goole, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:26 (fourteen years ago)

it's the part of the article where he goes through his 'invisible man' phase... after attending classes about becoming a PUA

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:26 (fourteen years ago)

is this article all about east coast asians

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:31 (fourteen years ago)

this article purports to shatter stereotypes about asian americans but actually ends up confirming them in the end, feel like the white people in power at NYMag planned for this all along *shakes fist*

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:32 (fourteen years ago)

Huang had a rough twenties, bumping repeatedly against the Bamboo Ceiling.

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:34 (fourteen years ago)

I'm just gonna copy and paste the PUA parts becuase lol PUA

What if you missed out on the lessons in masculinity taught in the gyms and locker rooms of America’s high schools? What if life has failed to make you a socially dominant alpha male who runs the American boardroom and prevails in the American bedroom? What if no one ever taught you how to greet white people and make them comfortable? What if, despite these deficiencies, you no longer possess an immigrant’s dutiful forbearance for a secondary position in the American narrative and want to be a player in the scrimmage of American appetite right now, in the present?

How do you undo eighteen years of a Chinese upbringing?

This is the implicit question that J. T. Tran has posed to a roomful of Yale undergraduates at a master’s tea at Silliman College. His answer is typically Asian: practice. Tran is a pickup artist who goes by the handle Asian Playboy. He travels the globe running “boot camps,” mostly for Asian male students, in the art of attraction. Today, he has been invited to Yale by the Asian-American Students Alliance.

“Creepy can be fixed,” Tran explains to the standing-room-only crowd. “Many guys just don’t realize how to project themselves.” These are the people whom Tran spends his days with, a new batch in a new city every week: nice guys, intelligent guys, motivated guys, who never figured out how to be successful with women. Their mothers had kept them at home to study rather than let them date or socialize. Now Tran’s company, ABCs of Attraction, offers a remedial education that consists of three four-hour seminars, followed by a supervised night out “in the field,” in which J. T., his assistant Gareth Jones, and a tall blonde wing-girl named Sarah force them to approach women. Tuition costs $1,450.

“One of the big things I see with Asian students is what I call the Asian poker face—the lack of range when it comes to facial expressions,” Tran says. “How many times has this happened to you?” he asks the crowd. “You’ll be out at a party with your white friends, and they will be like—‘Dude, are you angry?’ ” Laughter fills the room. Part of it is psychological, he explains. He recalls one Korean-American student he was teaching. The student was a very dedicated schoolteacher who cared a lot about his students. But none of this was visible. “Sarah was trying to help him, and she was like, ‘C’mon, smile, smile,’ and he was like …” And here Tran mimes the unbearable tension of a face trying to contort itself into a simulacrum of mirth. “He was so completely unpracticed at smiling that he literally could not do it.” Eventually, though, the student fought through it, “and when he finally got to smiling he was, like, really cool.”

Tran continues to lay out a story of Asian-American male distress that must be relevant to the lives of at least some of those who have packed Master Krauss’s living room. The story he tells is one of Asian-American disadvantage in the sexual marketplace, a disadvantage that he has devoted his life to overturning. Yes, it is about picking up women. Yes, it is about picking up white women. Yes, it is about attracting those women whose hair is the color of the midday sun and eyes are the color of the ocean, and it is about having sex with them. He is not going to apologize for the images of blonde women plastered all over his website. This is what he prefers, what he stands for, and what he is selling: the courage to pursue anyone you want, and the skills to make the person you desire desire you back. White guys do what they want; he is going to do the same.

But it is about much more than this, too. It is about altering the perceptions of Asian men—perceptions that are rooted in the way they behave, which are in turn rooted in the way they were raised—through a course of behavior modification intended to teach them how to be the socially dominant figures that they are not perceived to be. It is a program of, as he puts it to me later, “social change through pickup.”

Tran offers his own story as an exemplary Asian underdog. Short, not good-looking, socially inept, sexually null. “If I got a B, I would be whipped,” he remembers of his childhood. After college, he worked as an aerospace engineer at Boeing and Raytheon, but internal politics disfavored him. Five years into his career, his entire white cohort had been promoted above him. “I knew I needed to learn about social dynamics, because just working hard wasn’t cutting it.”

His efforts at dating were likewise “a miserable failure.” It was then that he turned to “the seduction community,” a group of men on Internet message boards like alt.seduction.fast. It began as a “support group for losers” and later turned into a program of self-improvement. Was charisma something you could teach? Could confidence be reduced to a formula? Was it merely something that you either possessed or did not possess, as a function of the experiences you had been through in life, or did it emerge from specific forms of behavior? The members of the group turned their computer-science and engineering brains to the question. They wrote long accounts of their dates and subjected them to collective scrutiny. They searched for patterns in the raw material and filtered these experiences through social-psychological research. They eventually built a model.

This past Valentine’s Day, during a weekend boot camp in New York City sponsored by ABCs of Attraction, the model is being played out. Tran and Jones are teaching their students how an alpha male stands (shoulders thrown back, neck fully extended, legs planted slightly wider than the shoulders). “This is going to feel very strange to you if you’re used to slouching, but this is actually right,” Jones says. They explain how an alpha male walks (no shuffling; pick your feet up entirely off the ground; a slight sway in the shoulders). They identify the proper distance to stand from “targets” (a slightly bent arm’s length). They explain the importance of “kino escalation.” (You must touch her. You must not be afraid to do this.) They are teaching the importance of sub-­communication: what you convey about yourself before a single word has been spoken. They explain the importance of intonation. They explain what intonation is. “Your voice moves up and down in pitch to convey a variety of different emotions.”

All of this is taught through a series of exercises. “This is going to feel completely artificial,” says Jones on the first day of training. “But I need you to do the biggest shit-eating grin you’ve ever made in your life.” Sarah is standing in the corner with her back to the students—three Indian guys, including one in a turban, three Chinese guys, and one Cambodian. The students have to cross the room, walking as an alpha male walks, and then place their hands on her shoulder—firmly but gently—and turn her around. Big smile. Bigger than you’ve ever smiled before. Raise your glass in a toast. Make eye contact and hold it. Speak loudly and clearly. Take up space without apology. This is what an alpha male does.

Before each student crosses the floor of that bare white cubicle in midtown, Tran asks him a question. “What is good in life?” Tran shouts.

The student then replies, in the loudest, most emphatic voice he can muster: “To crush my enemies, see them driven before me, and to hear the lamentation of their women—in my bed!”

For the intonation exercise, students repeat the phrase “I do what I want” with a variety of different moods.

“Say it like you’re happy!” Jones shouts. (“I do what I want.”) Say it like you’re sad! (“I do what I want.” The intonation utterly unchanged.) Like you’re sad! (“I … do what I want.”) Say it like you’ve just won $5 million! (“I do what I want.”)

Raj, a 26-year-old Indian virgin, can barely get his voice to alter during intonation exercise. But on Sunday night, on the last evening of the boot camp, I watch him cold-approach a set of women at the Hotel Gansevoort and engage them in conversation for a half-hour. He does not manage to “number close” or “kiss close.” But he had done something that not very many people can do.

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:36 (fourteen years ago)

so many of the students in my undergrad chemistry classes are azn

wonder if theyre good with women

gimme the lootpack (Lamp), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:36 (fourteen years ago)

i'm glad that drunk white lady showed up to provide crucial insight

buzza, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:40 (fourteen years ago)

drunk white lady is the new manic pixie dream girl

buzza, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:41 (fourteen years ago)

seriously

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:45 (fourteen years ago)

Here was a drunk white lady speaking what so many others over the years must have been insufficiently drunk to tell me.

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:47 (fourteen years ago)

^^^ new ILE board description

"Hungry clouds swag on the deep." — William Blake (bernard snowy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:50 (fourteen years ago)

(... or maybe ILTMI)

"Hungry clouds swag on the deep." — William Blake (bernard snowy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:50 (fourteen years ago)

fyi

http://www.amazon.com/How-Date-White-Woman-Practical/dp/0919637264

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/513DDK48XAL._SS500_.jpg

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 01:08 (fourteen years ago)

STOP LOOKING AT ME QUAN

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 01:08 (fourteen years ago)

(sorry that was pretty racist, also his name probably doesn't even rhyme with swan! I'm gonna put myself on timeout)

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 01:10 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.asianworldpress.com/ReaderComments.html

buzza, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 01:11 (fourteen years ago)

5 out of 5 stars(Asian man) A reviewer, (USA) July xx, 2003, (gave rating: 5/5), At Long Last

I was so happy to find a book on this topic. Adam Quan makes it easy to do something you always wanted to do, meet and get to know white women as a dating choice. And don't listen to any of those who object to it because of personal insecurity , learn to see other ethnics as people..

buzza, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 01:12 (fourteen years ago)

(A man) A reviewer, (USA), December xx, 2005, (gave rating: 4/5),Great way to fire up an interracial relationship!

As a white law student, it was interesting to get a new perspective on what asian men are thinking. Personally, I have had horrible luck with women, but I got this book for my asian friend in hopes that he could land a girlfriend for himself. I highly recommend it, as I know I certainly have a thing or two to learn from asian investment bankers about picking up women.

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 01:14 (fourteen years ago)

Asian man) A reviewer, (California, USA) Aug xx, 2005, (gave rating: 3/5), I haven't read this book, there is a demand of East-West for relationship!

I bought this book from Amazon. I am an Asian man. I always attracted to Caucasian / Hispanics woman. This started when I was in high school. As for the big picture, here my observation of other Asian-men may share similar situation with me:

Asian-Americans ......We are evolving, certainly, relationship between Asian-man and White woman as no exception. However, we still have some gap to close .......

As far as the current situation, we expect this to be an issue we need to address to bring the gap closer. We cannot be quiet on this as we see there is a demand for both relationships.

Personally, I seen Asian-man and White-woman relationship. Including myself had experienced couple of them approached me in the past. I was picky but one I felt regret I should have go for. As for other Asian-male friends, I know some like White woman. Basically, I conclude ... this book brings us the subject Just-In-Time ...

iatee, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 01:14 (fourteen years ago)

okay i haven't finished this entire article and i wish the author hadn't used that PUA example and he admits himself that the "bamboo ceiling" thing he's talking about isn't a dire problem in the grand scheme of things, but i don't know, the part i read was interesting. i feel like it's kind of impossible to talk about real experiences of race without veering uncomfortably close to affirming stereotypes sometimes. the parts of the article that talk about white perceptions of Asian Americans as robotic/somehow less fully human than white people are...i believe that's a real perception out there in the world and i find it easy to believe it would affect asian americans' lives.

some parts of it are undoubtedly wack but i...kind of like it.

horseshoe, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 01:29 (fourteen years ago)

and the trying to get white women thing...i just feel like that's a real thing experienced at some point by men (not all men, obvs) in almost every racial minority group in this country? i'm not excusing it...it just seems like it's part of the mechanism of race ideology meeting gender ideology...that was horribly expressed, but you know what i mean.

horseshoe, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 01:31 (fourteen years ago)

i should probably finish this article before i defend it, huh.

horseshoe, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 01:32 (fourteen years ago)

pretty much the entire article can be chalked up to 'cultural differences'

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 01:33 (fourteen years ago)

I mean it's like asian american immigrants growing up in asian household w/ asian values have difficulty in fitting in with american culture shocker.

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 01:34 (fourteen years ago)

a lot of things i enjoy reading can be chalked up to "cultural differences" tbh

horseshoe, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 01:50 (fourteen years ago)

I mean, advocating the bagging white women primarily for trophy display purposes as evidence of having conformed to and becoming successful at Western cultural notions of dating and relationships seems pretty reprehensible, imo.

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 02:02 (fourteen years ago)

i might have misread it, but it didn't seem like the author of the piece was advocating it. that PUA dude, for sure. i don't disagree with you!

horseshoe, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 03:04 (fourteen years ago)

i mean, yes, he reports on that dude too neutrally.

horseshoe, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 03:06 (fourteen years ago)

I'm going to quote the concluding part again

And though the debate she sparked about Asian-American life has been of questionable value, we will need more people with the same kind of defiance, willing to push themselves into the spotlight and to make some noise, to beat people up, to seduce women, to make mistakes, to become entrepreneurs, to stop doggedly pursuing official paper emblems attesting to their worthiness, to stop thinking those scraps of paper will secure anyone’s happiness, and to dare to be interesting.

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 03:09 (fourteen years ago)

yes okay that part is wack

horseshoe, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 03:11 (fourteen years ago)

that whole sentence is wack. he makes observations that seem like they could build to a really good article but this is not that article. he falls back on some dumb ways of synthesizing those observations.

horseshoe, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 03:12 (fourteen years ago)

the reporting in that piece is really great, but the editing (in the sense of creating an arc and coming to conclusions) is not as good

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 03:16 (fourteen years ago)

I mean this article gets my craw. I don't like the fact that this is only about successful Asian Americans instead of Asian Americans as a whole. and it's like, oh, socially awkward yet academically successful Ivy Leaguers have trouble picking up girls? and it's because they're Asian? so all those other white socially awkward nerds are eating a pussy buffet, because they're white and know how to smile, yeah?

I don't need to point out that a large majority of Asian Americans are perfectly mediocre in school, do not attend top tier colleges and don't really have any ambitions of making it big!

and wouldn't you know, America is not really a meritocracy at all- the straight white male still exerts a disproportionate amount of influence, and that proportion only increases the higher you go in society!

I mean yeah horseshoe the article does make some good points but they go hand in hand with a whole lot of WTFery.

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 03:19 (fourteen years ago)

I do believe there are racially inflected assumptions wired into our neural circuitry that we use to sort through the sea of faces we confront. And although I am in most respects devoid of Asian characteristics, I do have an Asian face.

and uh, instead of ascribing these things to cultural differences, this suggests a (pretty racist) genetic essentialism. o rly

a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 03:21 (fourteen years ago)

and it doesn't really help his case at all that he spends the last part of the article going "I AM AN ARTIST WHO HAS BEEN POORLY FED IN THE PAST BECAUSE I BELIEVE IN ~IDEALS~"

I mean, the author is really kidding himself if he believes he's rejected American ideals along with his Asian ones - the figure of the iconoclast principled artist carries a lot of weight in certain circles! it's not like individualism is frowned upon in America.

dayo, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 03:27 (fourteen years ago)

to be fair, again, i think the author does disclaim at one point because he's at least aware of how "first world problems" it sounds to be like poor ivy league graduates who don't end up running the world like their white counterparts! i think he could have stood to draw more clearly the distinction between an image of Asian Americans (evidenced in the whole oh no Asians are taking over our schools, and maybe even in some of the mythology that PUA dude is defining himself against) and the real, far-from-monolithic experience of being Asian American. But the one does influence the other. anyway at this point i'm not disagreeing with you at all, dayo, and also i am uninformed so i should shut up.

xxp

horseshoe, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 03:29 (fourteen years ago)

yeah I remember that part as well. I'm kind of on edge because I had someone forward this to me today with a "fuck yeah, finally someone who ~understands~ us" note attached, and I cringe that this article might be considered a net positive for portrayals of Asian Americans in America.

I just read this response

http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/browbeat/archive/2011/05/10/a-response-to-wesley-yang-s-paper-tigers.aspx

and it pretty much sums up my reaction to the article in a much more elegant and thoughtful way.

dayo, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 03:32 (fourteen years ago)

I do believe there are racially inflected assumptions wired into our neural circuitry that we use to sort through the sea of faces we confront. And although I am in most respects devoid of Asian characteristics, I do have an Asian face.

and uh, instead of ascribing these things to cultural differences, this suggests a (pretty racist) genetic essentialism. o rly

― a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Tuesday, May 10, 2011 11:21 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah. the second sentence you quoted is so vague to me that it actually seems in opposition to the first one. like, doesn't he just mean, people make assumptions about people of other racial groups? i don't know why he didn't just say that. but yes, i disagree with him about the "wired into our neural circuitry" part.

xp great whenever i actually finish this article i'll read that one

horseshoe, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 03:32 (fourteen years ago)

the whole thing is OTM, but I'll quote

The fact is, every individual is marked by several overlapping forms of identity—not just ethnicity but also gender, class, attractiveness, intelligence, and distance in time and space from the emigrant country. Ignore these other factors, as Yang does, and naturally everything becomes a simple reflection of ethnicity.

In my professional life, for example, I've dealt with many of the issues he describes. I'm not as assertive as I'd like to be. I often fear that I'm more tenacious than creative or canny. These are precisely the "typical" Asian qualities Yang describes. But do I feel this way because I'm Asian? I could just as easily see those issues as a reflection of my status as a woman. In reality, both factors have probably played a role—as have other aspects of my background and personality. Yang builds a lot of his argument on thumbnail sketches of individuals, and in many of those examples—including his own, personal tale, which he seems to have trouble seeing past—I didn't come away convinced that Asian-ness was the key element at play.

dayo, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 03:35 (fourteen years ago)

my sister alerted me to this article in a "this might actually be a net positive for portrayals of Asian Americans" spirit. (i know the article is focused on East Asians and not South Asians, but there are resonances.) she was ambivalent about parts of it. i think in part the over-positive response just comes of being sort of starved for this kind of analysis, especially in something like new york mag. but i am happy to read something smarter!

horseshoe, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 03:35 (fourteen years ago)

it's a really smart response!

http://www.ninashenrastogi.com/

I think I have a new crush!

dayo, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 03:58 (fourteen years ago)

http://img.timeinc.net/time/images/covers/1101870831_259.jpg

dayo, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 04:01 (fourteen years ago)

the army's secret army of army armies

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 04:08 (fourteen years ago)

far as east asians in american pop culture, i was surprised to see an asian guy in the new fast and furious get the (white) girl. that was pretty unusual. but i still do see WAY more white guy/asian girl pairups on tv and in films than both-asian couples.

most south asian characters on british tv, they seem to be either given english names like that woman from mistresses, so have no relation to any concept of asianness (as if they did, they would prob have to succumb to any number of stereotypes/cliches) and/or seem to only get to be exciting when they are with white/non asian partners. its like some new blanding out of corny liberalism.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 10:21 (fourteen years ago)

(dont watch eastenders to know what the asian family in there are like, but they look pretty cardboard)

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 10:21 (fourteen years ago)

*its like some new blanding out of corny liberalism (and white male wish fulfillment)

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 10:22 (fourteen years ago)

it's facking eastenders san, they're all facking cardboard

until you can see right thru (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 10:22 (fourteen years ago)

yeah i know but the asian and most of the non white characters in general tbh are really thinly/cornily characterised. they dont feel fleshed out or rounded out as the white characters.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 10:25 (fourteen years ago)

id like them to be as crazy/unrealistic/idiotic (in an exciting, rather than boring, worthy) way as the white characters basically.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 10:26 (fourteen years ago)

A girl i know was a member of the first Asian family in Eastenders. They were (rightly) written off by most Asian viewers as unrealistic and beset by terrible cliches but there was also a strange sense of pride in a lot of quarters, often from the same people, that there was at least some kind of representation, no matter how tokenistic or stupid.

I've caught bits and pieces of the new family and it just seems to be the same kind of arranged marriage / gay-son-horror / 'you will run family business!' stuff repeated again and again.

I LOVE BELARUS (ShariVari), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 11:55 (fourteen years ago)

STOP LOOKING AT ME QUAN

― a board in which there is lively and fuiud debate? (dayo), Tuesday, May 10, 2011 8:08 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

thought this was hilarious, tbh

cop a cute abdomen (gbx), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 17:05 (fourteen years ago)

far as east asians in american pop culture, i was surprised to see an asian guy in the new fast and furious get the (white) girl. that was pretty unusual. but i still do see WAY more white guy/asian girl pairups on tv and in films than both-asian couples.

― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, May 11, 2011 6:21 AM (8 hours ago) Bookmark

heh i was gonna mention this - as soon as i saw the am/wf action in Fast Five, i thought to myself "i bet justin lin considers this his greatest achievement"

Princess TamTam, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 18:52 (fourteen years ago)

anyway i thought this article wasnt that bad - the slate rebuttal is good too though

Princess TamTam, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 18:53 (fourteen years ago)

also the part where he talks about amy chua kinda made me want to read her book

Princess TamTam, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 18:57 (fourteen years ago)

half of my childhood was spent in extremely middle class asian american environments and most of this shit just comes off as whining to me

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 19:05 (fourteen years ago)

then again I kind of just skimmed it to look for lines to laugh at so

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 19:05 (fourteen years ago)

After Tran attended one of Mystery's bootcamps, he began to develop his own methods of attraction, concentrating on developing his own holistic approach to the art of seduction. Through his personal blog in which he talked about his adventures in the dating game, his successes and failures, he received a telephone call from a woman whose son was being harassed and bullied at his high school. She had been reading The Asian Playboy's blogs and believed that he could help her son overcome his shyness and help him to be assertive enough to get through the bullying. She paid for Tran to fly out to her home in Canada and he spent three days helping her son improve his confidence and social skills. This chance decision of flying out to Canada was the initial spark for Tran's career, and the starting point of his company, ABCs of Attraction, which he launched in 2005.

Tran introduced the concept of the ABCDEF structure which incorporates three main components, namely: thoughts, actions, and words. The concept teaches men how to develop their attitudes, change the manner of their dress, and convey sexuality while courting and dating women. The Asian Playboy mainly teaches shy Asian men confidence and communication skills.

Tran appears at a wide range of events and seminars, offering bootcamps which last from three days to several weeks. Each boot camps is designed to help men improve their social interaction skills. The Asian Playboy works along several instructors and coaches including Johnny Wolf, Andrew AKA Showtime, Ozzie AKA The Latino Gentleman and William AKA Man Cannon.

buzza, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 19:22 (fourteen years ago)

tiger in the sack mother

goole, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 19:35 (fourteen years ago)

ok I actually read this shit and the entire thing isn't horrible or anything, the scope is just incredibly small. One immediate thought was that the only place where he doesn't really focus on financial success is with the seduction artist shit, which actually is pretty horrible now that I think about it.

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 19:35 (fourteen years ago)

I guess uh in the end my main critique is that the article makes the world seem so small and horrible, and the world is pretty horrible, whatever that means I guess since I've been typing the word a lot I'll keep typing it, but its so horrible in so many new ways to discover during your life

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 19:42 (fourteen years ago)

I sort of know W3sl3y Y@ng from school -- he was my good friend's boyfriend for a while but I never really got to know him [/pointless, unremarkable brag]

Unrelated admission of racist thought: there's this Chinese girl in my basketball weekly clinic -- she's relatively good and I couldn't help but notice that she had a very "disciplined" attitude, like she seemed to focus extra hard on every drill and be very demanding of herself. She also gets on my case about every little thing I do wrong and it's started to piss me off (I'm practically a beginner at basketball and I've been practicing my ass off and making huge progress so I really don't appreciate it). I had this massive urge to start calling her "tiger mother," like to her face, like as in "hey, take it easy there tiger mother." Obviously I don't actually think this is a good idea. Also I think I'm developing a crush on her. That is all.

bin caught laden (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 20:14 (fourteen years ago)

She sounds pretty annoying.

Pleasant Plains, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 20:24 (fourteen years ago)

Yeah, like on one play in a drill I made a bad cut that would have cut off the guy with the ball from getting to the rim, and the coach says to me "Where were you going with that cut?" and SHE says "I don't know coach" -- or we'll be doing some simple full-court running and passing drill where we have to make some ostensible effort to score and she'll actually talk to her group about what she thinks is going wrong and why they're not scoring.

bin caught laden (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 20:27 (fourteen years ago)

lol pp

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 21:03 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.noisetosignal.org/images/posts/warushmore09.jpg

l-r: hurting, Chinese tiger girl

dayo, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 21:53 (fourteen years ago)

it's kinda a harsh double bind cuz nymag are saying azns are pussies, but then if an azn was to be assertive and actually do something about it like shoot up their offices or collude with the chinese govenment in a massive ddos attack on every company that advertises in nymag, ppl would be all 'lol crazns be crazy'

no xmas for jonchaies (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:38 (fourteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-n7aeqMzis

dayo, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:41 (fourteen years ago)

I actually want this wesley yang fellow and The best of Marc Loi : Facebook Feminist to duke it out

maybe in a kung fu match

because they're both asian, you see

dayo, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:47 (fourteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1S0oFoyucs

damn this is old school. i remember downloading this song on napster. i even made my website peaceoutside . org because of this track heh
D0CH0LIDAY 10 months ago

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:51 (fourteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMOZRk74QrY

Did Jin get any attention when he did Learn Chinese?

I LOVE BELARUS (ShariVari), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:54 (fourteen years ago)

I definitely had that tai mai shu mp3 when I was 12

dayo, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:55 (fourteen years ago)

true fact: mc jin is now in hong kong doing raps for the government

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=te-TiL9YVaE

(dude with the bow tie is donald tsang, chief executive of hong kong)

dayo, Wednesday, 11 May 2011 22:57 (fourteen years ago)

Ha! That's awesome.

I LOVE BELARUS (ShariVari), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 23:00 (fourteen years ago)

damn I never would've guessed that that tai mai shu shit would hold up well

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 11 May 2011 23:06 (fourteen years ago)

Maybe the whole tiger mother thing prepared me for that article, but i wasn't too upset by it... well, the PUA stuff was kinda depressing. And the article was way too long. And especially by the end it got kind of self-gratifying. So it wasn't actually... good, but I don't know, I do think there is still a painful lack of self-awareness / willing self-blindness to these issues, so I can forgive it a little? The tiger mother article, OTOH, seemed to actually be encouraging those cultural stereotypes to non-Asians, though I think in the end it the sample was selected to court controversy.

But at the same time I can slightly cop to AAM's take of "eh we've heard it all before, who carez".

Nhex, Thursday, 12 May 2011 02:51 (fourteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbW-XYqbol0

buzza, Sunday, 15 May 2011 21:19 (fourteen years ago)

one year passes...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cx67ZUY9c2o

buzza, Saturday, 7 July 2012 20:59 (thirteen years ago)

eleven months pass...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=61fXa9hTowY

Minus: asian tech support guy there to answer the white lady's questions
Plus: white lady actually flirts with asian guy

i don't even have an internet (Hurting 2), Friday, 21 June 2013 03:00 (twelve years ago)

i'd say this video is thoroughly unproblematic. he doesn't even seem like a great tech support dude, just a bewildered salesman.

Treeship, Friday, 21 June 2013 03:09 (twelve years ago)

three months pass...
two years pass...

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/jul/08/star-trek-beyond-george-takei-sulu-really-unfortunate

making an asian character gay = another way to ensure the asian male in a major hollywood films doesnt get to 'get the girl'.

StillAdvance, Friday, 8 July 2016 11:25 (nine years ago)

yeah, a little torn on this one. i get that it's a personal tribute to Takei and in the show's progressive fashion
but ya know, of course it's the Asian guy
otoh Harry Kim was probably worse on the whole

Nhex, Friday, 8 July 2016 11:33 (nine years ago)

personal tribute, shmersonal tribute. its BS.

StillAdvance, Friday, 8 July 2016 11:35 (nine years ago)

There's nothing wrong or worse about a male character "getting the guy" instead of "getting the girl", and your comments are suggesting you think otherwise. I hope that's not what you actually believe. But I do agree that if the person you're supposedly paying tribute to thinks there's something fishy about your tribute, you should maybe actually listen to them.

emil.y, Friday, 8 July 2016 13:10 (nine years ago)

"There's nothing wrong or worse about a male character "getting the guy" instead of "getting the girl", and your comments are suggesting you think otherwise. I hope that's not what you actually believe"

theres nothing wrong with it, in isolation.

but looking at the history of asian male representation on american tv and in the movies, i see it as the latest attempt to demean asian heterosexual men.

thats not to say that i think being gay makes one less of a man, but hetero asian men are the majority of asian men in the US, and they are routinely denied sexual agency on screen.

so i cant help but see it as a victory for gay men/gay asians, but not really a victory for the majority of asian men in the US, who are still under represented in hollywood.

basically, its interesting that they will allow a notable asian character to be gay, but wont let him be heterosexual.

StillAdvance, Friday, 8 July 2016 13:21 (nine years ago)

i hope Simon Pegg dies

and the Gove maths out Raab (Noodle Vague), Friday, 8 July 2016 13:26 (nine years ago)

two years pass...

I want to talk about Crazy, Rich Asians. I enjoyed it for a lot of reasons –– and I was struck by the use of female gaze. It's an old-fashioned kind of movie, but from a significantly different perspective. I suspect it'll be dismissed as conservative rom-com pablum by (white) (male) (American) audiences, but I think there's a lot of canniness to its construction and its politics of representation.

remy bean, Tuesday, 21 August 2018 23:09 (seven years ago)

there is and there isn't. i mean, it adheres pretty strongly to rom-com cliche and basic story has been done to death a million times...

but i admit i saw it opening night last week just to support the Asian/Asian-American casting and existence of the film. every time I read the factoid about "25 years since The Joy Luck Club!" i palm my face

Nhex, Wednesday, 22 August 2018 00:46 (seven years ago)

I liked this movie a lot but I don’t really have anything smart to say about it vis a vis Representation. It was a delightful romantic comedy with a phenomenal cast of oughta-be-stars (Michelle Yeoh and Ken Jeong were probably the most famous people in this movie, at least in the USA).

faculty w1fe (silby), Wednesday, 22 August 2018 00:54 (seven years ago)

Rly the notable thing abt this movie to me is that it’s a big genre movie marketed towards a general audience that really does Just Happen To Be about Asian and Asian-American characters. It didn’t have to do anything to justify itself to white audiences–no “white friend” character added due to studio notes, nothing about being Chinese was the Motivating Problem or Second Act Twist for any of the characters. Certainly it should’ve been a no brainer that such a movie could be successful but maybe the $100 million domestic box office his movie will do will provide the motivation Hollywood needs to make more movies like this.

faculty w1fe (silby), Wednesday, 22 August 2018 01:05 (seven years ago)

It wont

Οὖτις, Wednesday, 22 August 2018 01:41 (seven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.