being the other man/woman

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
i'm sure there are other threads on this topic, but search sucks. so: do you have any experience with this? how did it end? what are your personal ethics on the matter? your anecdotes, hard-luck tales and words to the wise below, please.

^@^, Thursday, 10 May 2007 11:12 (eighteen years ago)

I've been in this situation once. The partner of the person I was seeing knew there was a third weel involved (their relationship was kinda open), but not that it was me. I probably couldn't have done if it had been a total secret. Anyway, there were situations where all three of us were together, and that felt really awkward. We eventually stopped seeing each other, but I can't say it was all in all a negative experience, just too complicated for everyone involved.

Outlogged, Thursday, 10 May 2007 11:34 (eighteen years ago)

i was the other man, she (finally) dumped her boyfriend to go out with me, then cheated on me two years later, over and over again

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:17 (eighteen years ago)

what goes around comes back around (i thought i told you, babe...)

Gukbe, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:17 (eighteen years ago)

I've always been of the opinion that if it's possible to steal someone away from their current partner, then they are the kind of person who can be stolen. And that's not really the sort of person I've ever wanted to be with.

C J, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:19 (eighteen years ago)

I didn't have the stomach for it.

This all happened a very long time ago... met a bloke who was in my town because he was going to uni. I knew he had a girlfriend back home, but he told me they had an "open relationship" so I kind of carried on with him, but was never particularly comfortable with it. One night I found (I can't remember if it was by accident - I certainly wasn't snooping, but I feel he was being careless because he *wanted* to get caught) a letter from the girlfriend back home. She told me that she had heard he was spending a lot of time with me, but urged him to "be strong, for the sake of their (not at all open) relationship."

I just felt sick. I had thought that it would be better to be the other woman than the cheated-on person, because at least you had the knowledge and therefore the power - but no, it didn't work that way. If someone is lying to their partner, they will lie to you, as well.

Masonic Boom, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:23 (eighteen years ago)

i dont think ive been the other person before. i would though, sure, why not? you know where you are (nowhere...but fun along the way)

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:29 (eighteen years ago)

I was once cited as being "the other man"

Incorrectly, funnily enough.

The girl basically *was* having an affair, but talked about the things that *we* had been doing (all chaste and above board, she was a friend of my sisters and we had all done these things in groups of three or more shuttup about Louis Jagger, I said no sex was involved right? OK brackets end), as that was safe to talk about. Overcompensating.

About a year later, she moved back up north. I visited her about a year after that, met her best friend, and .. two kids later.... here we are.

Mark G, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:34 (eighteen years ago)

Kate and CJ totally OTM. I wouldn't do it - you're opening up a world of lies and deception which will ultimately lead to misery. I've had it done to me too, and obv it's v.v. hurtful.

Dr.C, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:35 (eighteen years ago)

i dont mind a stranger being hurt

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:35 (eighteen years ago)

What if you were the stranger? Empathy? The categorical imperative/golden rule?

Masonic Boom, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:36 (eighteen years ago)

I've been this person (sort of) a couple of times. Once was like you describe Gareth. I didn't expect anything to happen (nor want it). Getting with someone who cheats is bad news. This situation was fine. He broke up with the girl after we had finished. Obv. wasn't meant to be.

The other time was with an ex who told me he and his current long-distance girl were in a "seeing other people" period. Later I realized this wasn't true but I wanted back with him and took the offered chance. We did get back together for awhile but it was a disaster (for reasons unrelated to infidelity). Good riddance to bad trash.

Overall I have a meh feeling on this. Could go either way depending on your feelings going in. In general it's probably safer not to want anything out of it than the superficial.

For the record, I've never cheated on anyone. That's a completely different story.

Ms Misery, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:36 (eighteen years ago)

i have been the other man. it was lots of fun, esp when i realised he was into me but still trying to resist. that was a couple of years ago - lasted for a few months, then i moved to a different city. as far as i know they're still together.

lex pretend, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:39 (eighteen years ago)

if i was the stranger? yea, itd suck. i like girls too much though. if they cute, they cute

agreed, cheatings a different story, never done that, wouldnt really want to go down that road particularly

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:41 (eighteen years ago)

What is the difference? I don't understand how you can be fine with being someones cheating-partner, but wouldn't cheat on your own partner? I don't understand that moral fineline.

Masonic Boom, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:43 (eighteen years ago)

I've been there a few times. I think it depends, if there's a friend involved or any additional circumstances (eg the couple have kids or something) then no way.

Otherwise, I kind of assume that if it's not happening with me, it's going to happen with someone else, and the poor bastard is going to end up cheated on anyway. Then I'm not too bothered. In fact it almost seems wasteful not to.

Expecting any of this to lead to a happy and trusting relationship is hoping for too much though.

Matt DC, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:43 (eighteen years ago)

same reason i give a tenner to someone i know, and i dont give it to somme other guy i dont know

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:43 (eighteen years ago)

or when i drunkenly took a piss in steve m's garden. id never do it in a friends garden though

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:45 (eighteen years ago)

Otherwise, I kind of assume that if it's not happening with me, it's going to happen with someone else, and the poor bastard is going to end up cheated on anyway. Then I'm not too bothered. In fact it almost seems wasteful not to.

Expecting any of this to lead to a happy and trusting relationship is hoping for too much though.


^^^ absolutely true. wouldnt hope for anything like a relationship out of it. i'd probably be expecting at least an awesome blowjob though

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:46 (eighteen years ago)

i dont encourage the dated to keep comin w th come ons anymore..altho i used to and im sure it felt bad for sumone..a girl i like who i know has a new bf and could be easily swept away from him,was a lil drunk and kept tellin me what she wante dto do and stuff..and all i could think about was sum poor dude sittin at home counting his next weeks paycheck versus what he could buy her for dinner in his head and i made sum weird adult decision to let it all be.like th beetlulls

danbunny, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:46 (eighteen years ago)

its not just wasteful, its immoral. in fact, you're helping the guy out really, showing him his girl sleeps with other people, and that also he should trust strangers less:D

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:47 (eighteen years ago)

How about being the other man/woman in bed with both of em? Based on my single piece of experience, don't.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:48 (eighteen years ago)

I've always been of the opinion that if it's possible to steal someone away from their current partner, then they are the kind of person who can be stolen. And that's not really the sort of person I've ever wanted to be with.

-- C J, Thursday, May 10, 2007 2:19 PM


oh, totally otm. a friend of mine met her chap while he was living with someone else, and they started seeing each other well before he broke up with his live-in lover. they've now been together for a year and have just moved in together, but now she's terrified that if he did the dirty for her, it's pretty likely he'll do it to her eventually as well. horrendous thought to have in the back of one's head.

does The Overlap count though, strictly speaking? I admit I used to do it a lot in my youth, and it seemed reasonable enough to my young, selfish mind. can't imagine doing it now though.

CharlieNo4, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)

you're all so negative about it! when i was the other man, as far as i know the relationship wasn't in trouble - it may have been but given that 2 years later they're still happily together it clearly wasn't serious. no one got hurt, no one faced any unpleasant truths, i had a fun summer fling.

lex pretend, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)

Are we talking about cheating on an ongoing basis, or stealing someone away from someone? Mister M stole me away. Am I the kind of person who can be stolen? I guess I was then, because I was no longer in love with the person I was with at the time. Now I am in love, so I'm no longer the kind of person who can be stolen away.

I suppose what I mean is that there isn't "that kind of person" on an ongoing basis, but circumstances can temporarily turn you into "that kind of person".

accentmonkey, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)

Also Kate - cheating on your own partner is actively and DIRECTLY hurting someone you're supposed to be close to, or even in love with. It's a totally different thing when there's a complete stranger involved.

Matt DC, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)

The Overlap only works if there is a certainty of dissoulution

danbunny, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:50 (eighteen years ago)

too many letters

danbunny, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:51 (eighteen years ago)

I keep thinking that I'm being old fashioned for being kind of shocked and/or horrified by some of the things being said in this thread.

But then realising that no, it's not the lack of "morality" or whatever, it's the total lack of empathy for the third party.

But I guess that's down to my experiences of being the cheated-on third party, or having my family ripped apart by a third party. No bit of fun, no matter how enjoyable, could make it worth it knowing I was inflicting that kind of pain on someone else. I'm not that cruel. WHETHER THEY ARE A STRANGER OR A FRIEND. I mean, what kind of an excuse is that? Is it OK to rob people if they're just complete strangers, and hey, I wouldn't rob from my friends?

Masonic Boom, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:55 (eighteen years ago)

i dont mind a stranger being hurt

-- 696, Thursday, May 10, 2007 4:35 PM (20 minutes ago)


i thought you were a socialist. this is 'thatcherkid of love' territory.

That one guy that quit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:57 (eighteen years ago)

The seriousness of the other person's relationship is a big factor too. If they'd been together years or had plans to do so then that's a 'no way' as well.

Also, sometimes you just don't know there's another person involved!

Matt DC, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:57 (eighteen years ago)

I never ever thought I'd use the term, but...

i thought you were a socialist. this is 'thatcherkid of love' territory.

...is kind of OTM.

Masonic Boom, Thursday, 10 May 2007 13:58 (eighteen years ago)

Kate. It's not all about you. Honest.

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:00 (eighteen years ago)

i was the other woman in a drunken regrettable one night utterly crap shag about three years ago. the bloke was/is part of my circle of friends (though at that stage no one knew his girlfriend well, and I had never met her). We were spotted snogging and then leaving a club together by others in the circle. I have regretted it so many times it isn't funny... his girlfriend is lovely and always very nice to me, no doubt she wonders why I'm a bit cool to her (because I'm overwhelmed by guilt every time she smiles at me), and they are getting married later this year. Some friends in the circle no longer speak to me as a result of it, and I know that I took an absolute dive in the respect of others even though they do still consider me a mate. Surprisingly no one seems to look badly on him for it even though he was the one with the girlfriend and I was single. It made me hate myself, particularly my drunken self, it was the last straw in a long period of reprehensible behaviour on my part so I pretty much gave up drinking.

my ethics on it? don't do it, it's not worth it, it impacted on my relationships with a whole bunch of people i care about in negative ways, i can't really imagine what it did to his relationship with his girlfriend and i hope to god he never tells her. i still cringe whenever i see either of them, which is relatively often.

gem, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:01 (eighteen years ago)

i was the other man, and it was hott. the main thing wz that i'd come out of a long term relationship a few weeks before, so the level of semi-commitment (TO FUN) without being something as pointless and depressing as a fuckbuddy error or whatever was so exactly what wz necessary. and her guy wz rubbish, so i never felt bad. eventually we got together, (not without a little heartache, granted, but hey) and i never worried about the whole "well if she can cheat once" thing what with it being an extremely lazy cliche and all.

r|t|c, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:07 (eighteen years ago)

Are we talking about cheating on an ongoing basis, or stealing someone away from someone? Mister M stole me away. Am I the kind of person who can be stolen? I guess I was then, because I was no longer in love with the person I was with at the time. Now I am in love, so I'm no longer the kind of person who can be stolen away.

I suppose what I mean is that there isn't "that kind of person" on an ongoing basis, but circumstances can temporarily turn you into "that kind of person".


i like this.

^@^, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:14 (eighteen years ago)

kate the problem with your analogy is that the third party cheatee doesn't take something the way a robber does.

^@^, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:26 (eighteen years ago)

I think being the "other man/woman" is a naughty thing to do.

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:30 (eighteen years ago)

I dunno, you're being party to the cheater taking something substantial out of their relationship, or away from their partner. It's metaphorical, but no less real. Of course, you could argue that a cheated-on relationship was obv not working anyway, or you could argue the opposite, that cheating isn't always significant and can be a way to stay IN a relationship if you have the right headspace...but being the third party is still a bit of an ethical morass.

Laurel, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:32 (eighteen years ago)

when you are the "other" man/woman, the cuckold is ALWAYS rubbish

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:38 (eighteen years ago)

agreed.

i think matt is otm about it depending on the various factors involved, as well.

xpost

^@^, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:39 (eighteen years ago)

btw if we're socialist surely "to each according to his need"

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:40 (eighteen years ago)

property is theft

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:40 (eighteen years ago)

minimum wage

Mark G, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:42 (eighteen years ago)

dictatorship of the proletariat

That one guy that quit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:43 (eighteen years ago)

it's still naughty, no matter how many long words you use to justify it.

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:43 (eighteen years ago)

Expecting any of this to lead to a happy and trusting relationship is hoping for too much though.

Friend of mine discovered that she was being cheated on. They divorced. He is still with the other after more than seven years. It's dead wrong to assume that it won't ever work out because cheating can't lead to a lasting relationship. It depends on the reasons why the cheating happens. I think it's a very simplistic way to look at how relationships and people work.

nathalie, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:44 (eighteen years ago)

sure, but is it just too much effort to break up with one person before persuing another?

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:46 (eighteen years ago)

G-kit, it depends. Effort? Maybe he still loved her (in some way). Relationships are never that simple.

I've always been of the opinion that if it's possible to steal someone away from their current partner, then they are the kind of person who can be stolen.

Sadly, you're a bit naive. Everyone can be stolen (at the right moment).

nathalie, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:48 (eighteen years ago)

"I love you so much that I couldn't even break up with you before nobbing this other girl over and over"?

dat tru love

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:50 (eighteen years ago)

nathalie i think you are 100000x otm.

g-kit you might not be old enough for this thread.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:51 (eighteen years ago)

I think the obvious difference between being the other person versus the cheater is in the latter you are violating a commitment you yourself have made. When you are the other person there is no such vow or commitment.

Whether or not this is immoral I think hinges on the many other factors mentioned on this thread. Everybody has their own meter for morality so your mileage may vary. Is it selfish to be the other person? I think definitely so. But we are all selfish at times no matter how you might delude yourself otherwise. We all also do things at one point that at other times, when wiser or in a different place in our lives, we wouldn't repeat.

I don't regret my brief periods as the other woman but I wouldn't do it again.

g-kit your reasons are why I've never cheated on a partner and can't see myself doing it.

Ms Misery, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:53 (eighteen years ago)

ms misery, you might not be old enough for this thread.

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:54 (eighteen years ago)

g-kit stop being a condescending dick to ms misery!

onimo, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)

Actually my friend's parents at school has this pair of best friends, a couple who lived next door to them, spent every Christmas together etc and one thing led to another and one thing led to another which led to a full-on permanent wife-swap scenario and amazingly BOTH new couples are still together 15 years on.

And they still have Christmas Dinner together which is just weird. They are either amazingly trusting or their relationships are a hotbed of resentment and jealousy.

Matt DC, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:57 (eighteen years ago)

onimo otm, sorry.

i know a guy that's 83 years old and craps in his hands. since he's all old, maybe i should go see him for relationship advice.

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:57 (eighteen years ago)

the secrecy is the killer. not worth it.

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 10 May 2007 14:59 (eighteen years ago)

so you're saying it's probably best to break up with your current partner before persuing another relationship, Dr Morbius? grow up!

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:00 (eighteen years ago)

Their relationships might just be a hot bed!

(xpost)

Mark G, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:01 (eighteen years ago)

kit, I was AGREEING with you. (also I'm not the one who was orignally condescending to you.)

Ms Misery, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:01 (eighteen years ago)

Kit was paraphrasing Tracer to prove a point, btw.

Matt DC, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:02 (eighteen years ago)

I know, Ms Mis, I was double agreeing with you while biting my thumb at Mr. Hand

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:02 (eighteen years ago)

G-kit, cheating is done for various reasons. It doesn't mean you stop loving your partner (per se).

nathalie, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:03 (eighteen years ago)

i have a story here:

a girl who had a serious boyfriend but who was very into me (and i was into her) used to come over to my room every monday night when her boyfriend had league bowling night. i'd buy a bottle of wine, she'd bring the ganja, we'd drink, smoke, and fuck for hours. it was great until the pregnancy scare and her boyfriend's desire to kill me.

the table is the table, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:03 (eighteen years ago)

i just like girls and im not going to keep my hands off because of some nebuluous guy ive never met. if hes failing his girl then he needs to buck his ideas up. plus i wouldnt be taking anything, id just be borrowing for a little while

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)

because I was no longer in love with the person I was with at the time.

I've been the other man 3 or 4 times but each time it was with someone in this kind of situation. Which is just about okay, I think - if a relationship is over but not yet finished, then the person doing the philandering doesn't qualify as CJ's pathologically unfaithful type.

Once, I was in this position, and it did affect things. Because I knew I was the other man - I was much younger and more naive at the time - I didn't really take my relationship with this girl as seriously as all that. As a result, I met another girl, got together with her, and told the first girl I couldn't see her any more. It was only months later that I realised that to her it HAD been a proper relationship. I felt a bit of a heel (but the girl I got together with I was with for over 2 years, so it wasn't at all something I could regret).

Mark C, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)

i gave up passing judgment on all this kind of stuff years ago. relationships are all different, there are too many complicating factors in any given situation to make any grand moral pronouncements. it's easy to sympathize with some poor guy or girl who's getting jerked around by a cheater, but less easy to sympathize with some domineering dickhead or borderline psychopath who's bullied someone into staying with them for way too long until the other person finally uses the leverage of an affair to pry themselves loose. sometimes the other man/woman is exploiting someone else's unhappiness, but sometimes they're genuinely smitten, and i have seen people forge happy loving relationships out of what started as affairs.

which is not to say i don't pass judgment in individual cases, just that i have a hard time making categorical statements.

tipsy mothra, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:09 (eighteen years ago)

secrecy = fairly easy to maintain if you are the cuckolder

g-kit if you disagree with nathalie you could start by refraining from making a cartoonish mockery of what she says

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:10 (eighteen years ago)

Ok, cheating done for various reasons... but are any of them noble?

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:12 (eighteen years ago)

TS: league bowling vs. drinkin', smokin' fuckin'?

Michael White, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:14 (eighteen years ago)

many are nobble

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:14 (eighteen years ago)

i like a lot of what nathalie and tracer have to say. in this instance, i also find the word 'complicated' tremendously reassuring.

^@^, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:14 (eighteen years ago)

g-kit, of course not, i never claimed it was noble. it's wrong but who's to say the cheater is the wrongest in the situation?

nathalie, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:15 (eighteen years ago)

Well.. the person beign cheated on. Surely?

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:16 (eighteen years ago)

if that person is a violent husband that barely lets his wife out then OTM

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:17 (eighteen years ago)

or wears sandals

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:17 (eighteen years ago)

nobility is overrated anyway

^@^, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:17 (eighteen years ago)

Surely best thing to do re: violent husband is get the fuck out of relationship, as opposed to provoke a violent asshole by fucking someone else while staying with violent asshole?

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:19 (eighteen years ago)

One person's noble is another person's self-righteous.

Ms Misery, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:20 (eighteen years ago)

Tracer, chill. Just saying like...

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:20 (eighteen years ago)

surely up and divorcing the husband wouldn't provoke him all either. brb off to go find my unicorn.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:21 (eighteen years ago)

g-kit did you not understand the first time someone said "all relationships are different"? there is never any single "best rule" which can be applied to all relationship difficulties regardless

lex pretend, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:21 (eighteen years ago)

Surely best thing to do re: violent husband is get the fuck out of relationship

exactly, why dont women just leave abusive relationship!!!

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:22 (eighteen years ago)

Give me a scenario where cheating is the best option.

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:23 (eighteen years ago)

I'm intrigued.

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:23 (eighteen years ago)

women be provokin'

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:23 (eighteen years ago)

Jesus fucking Christ.

Matt DC, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:24 (eighteen years ago)

i saw a simmering pot of resentment once

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:25 (eighteen years ago)

HOW DO I UNINSTALL CHEATING VISTA

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:25 (eighteen years ago)

it was on the a59, just north of blackburn

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:25 (eighteen years ago)

Dude was only having a wank, it was more like Jesus making love to Christ without his man God knowing... (xxxpost literally)

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)

i'll delete your fucking head in

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)

G-Kit, most people are falliable and do not always choose the best option. This does not automatically make them horrible people.

Ms Misery, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)

http://img-x.fotocommunity.com/21/2224821.jpg

alkie cat, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:27 (eighteen years ago)

http://rth.org/tarpits/saberst1.gif

alkie cat, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:27 (eighteen years ago)

Loving this thread now! Don't tell non region specific. It knows I see other threads but, you know...

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:27 (eighteen years ago)

http://i73.photobucket.com/albums/i229/orsespeed/Picture3.png

alkie cat, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:27 (eighteen years ago)

Everybody has their own meter for morality so your mileage may vary.

this is a nice way of saying we live in a fallen age. even a cursory reading of Foucault should have told us that.

That one guy that quit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)

http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2007/05/bunny.jpg

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.umich.edu/~urecord/0405/Apr11_05/img/050411_DogCat(21).jpg
^^^^this one best represents alkie cat's thoughts on the thread subject

alkie cat, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:29 (eighteen years ago)

I was gonna say that Matt DC's example of a comfortable wife-swapping quartet is very similar to one in David Lodge's novel 'Small World', but for such an arrangement to be tenable over a fifteen-year period is pretty mind-blowing. Surely there can't be much backbiting or deceit in such a static situation?

Just got offed, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:29 (eighteen years ago)

less talk, more pics

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:30 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.plgart.com/Freeman/ArtFreeman/Freeman-Adagio_for_Three_Cats.jpg

alkie cat, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:32 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.mgtaylor.com/mgtaylor/images/3cat.gif

alkie cat, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:33 (eighteen years ago)

HOW BIZZAR

dan m, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:33 (eighteen years ago)

this is rapidly becoming my favourite thread.

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:34 (eighteen years ago)

Just Got Offed - it hasn't been 15 years of wife swapping, one guy left his wife for the other woman, only to realise his counterpart had been cheating on him with his wife and planned to do the same thing. So they essentially moved out and into the other's bedroom and stayed there ever since.

Matt DC, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:34 (eighteen years ago)



You've told him lies now for so long
Yet still he's ready to forgive
He's got you back and that's all he wants
It's a lot more than I'm left with

You don't care
Now that you're gone
But you know
How much I miss you?
It's not fair
After all you've done
That I'm so...
I still want to kiss you

And throwing presents straight away
Because you could never take them home
Always scared what he might say
But always leaving me alone

You don't care
Now that you're gone
But you know
How much I miss you?
It's not fair
After all you've done
That I'm so...
I still want to kiss you

You told him what he wants to hear
And so you got another chance
But I was yours for seven years
Is that what you call a dalliance?!

You don't care
Now that you're gone
But you know
How much I miss you?
It's not fair
After all you've done
That I'm so...
I still want to kiss you


ah, gedge.

grimly fiendish, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:35 (eighteen years ago)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/5e/OMC-HowBizarre.jpg

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:35 (eighteen years ago)

http://blog.wired.com/photos/uncategorized/smoking_cat_nissan_1.png

alkie cat, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:36 (eighteen years ago)

http://65.39.81.217/photos/2002-10/scary_cat.jpg

alkie cat, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:36 (eighteen years ago)

weird that sound like this situation my friend Vaughn was in. there was him and this girl Nicola, and when they went home, Vaughn would wait for Nicola to go to bed, and then he would crawl in bed with his housemate Wes

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:36 (eighteen years ago)

http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/invishighfive.jpg

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:37 (eighteen years ago)

i don't have a garden

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:38 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.mycathatesyou.com/images/cats/2006/02/pollyanna_hugh.jpg
^^^^ a scenario where cheating is the best option

alkie cat, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:38 (eighteen years ago)

OTM

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:38 (eighteen years ago)

Matt: I know that they've been with the same partner for 15 years, the 'arrangement' to which I alluded was the friendship, the continued bonding between the two reversed couples.

Just got offed, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:39 (eighteen years ago)

manchurian catdidate

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:40 (eighteen years ago)

http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/4.jpg

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:40 (eighteen years ago)

Oh wow.

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:44 (eighteen years ago)

I mean. Wow.

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:44 (eighteen years ago)

Bow wow in fact.

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:44 (eighteen years ago)

Can I get four in a row?

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:44 (eighteen years ago)

This thread is dying...

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:44 (eighteen years ago)

;_;

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:44 (eighteen years ago)

RIP Cheater thred

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:44 (eighteen years ago)

i'm cheating on u all

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:45 (eighteen years ago)

neverforgetcryingcheatedoneagle.jpg

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:45 (eighteen years ago)

i'm cheating on u all

With your trackerball? I think not!

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:45 (eighteen years ago)

http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2007/03/babushkacat.jpg

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)

this thread was v good and funny.

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)

http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/babushkakitty.jpg

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)

I love babushka cats.

Ms Misery, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)

I am loving these new cats!

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)

the orange one in the pink hat looks so ridic happy it's almost touching

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)

this thread was ok but creepy
then it got cat pictures on it
now it just owns

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)

this thread was a waste until the images started flowin'

dan m, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:48 (eighteen years ago)

http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/ice-cream-zombie.jpg

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:48 (eighteen years ago)

i preferred thread before lolcats this time. when people actually said stuff of substance.

if u want lolcats u can go to any number of threads.

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:48 (eighteen years ago)

well you're outnumbered.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)

arguments about relativistic morality != substance sry

dan m, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)

well you're outnumbered.

but never outgunned. misseh.

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)

poor steve got upsetted

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)

then he emailed me

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)

blueski hates lolcats and fun. I know cos he told me!*

*maybe not about the lolcats but definitely the fun.**

**nah, he likes fun.

Ha ha g-kit has cyber-boy to chete with!

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)

http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2007/04/3.jpg

i wish it said substance instead of bucket but this is best i can do ;_;

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:51 (eighteen years ago)

someone post the ever-popular Morally Relativistic Cat

kenan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:51 (eighteen years ago)

i'm not upset, just annoyed/bored.

why would i e-mail you g-kit?

i think i'm just jealous of all these naughy other men/women. what exciting lives they must lead.

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:51 (eighteen years ago)

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/130/415260708_5560a27159.jpg?v=0

alkie cat, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:52 (eighteen years ago)

oh, way to image bomb a really interesting thread, fuckos.

CharlieNo4, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:52 (eighteen years ago)

people are so intolerant. i can't stand it.

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:53 (eighteen years ago)

i know you're not upset, it was joek.

you wouldn't email me, it was joek @ my own expense, and one that you can share!

let's all snuggle

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:53 (eighteen years ago)

Serious cat time...

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:54 (eighteen years ago)

ugh snuggling

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:54 (eighteen years ago)

Also getting back to it: serial cheaters. Has anyone ever been involved with one? I've wondered how they get away with it so often and for so long. Is it a balance of power thing in their base relationship?

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:55 (eighteen years ago)

snuggling is so much better than cheating

kenan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:55 (eighteen years ago)

i'm cheating on u, stevem

g-kit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:55 (eighteen years ago)

i once knew a serial cheater and could never figure out why he didn't just leave his wife. the old "for the kids" excuse just didn't really make any sense because he basically didn't live with them anymore.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:56 (eighteen years ago)

god help us if there's a war

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:56 (eighteen years ago)

I LIKED THIS THREAD BETTER WHEN IT HAD KATE, LET'S ALL GET SERIOUS AGAIN SO SHE'LL COME BACK

alkie cat, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:57 (eighteen years ago)

i wish this thread had more shari lewis

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:58 (eighteen years ago)

i once knew a serial cheater and could never figure out why he didn't just leave his wife. the old "for the kids" excuse just didn't really make any sense because he basically didn't live with them anymore.

Did his wife know? I've seen cases where the wife or husband seems to accept it. Why?! Well I can guess why it just seems a bit sad really...

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 15:59 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.spin.com/features/hotbeef/images/2006/07/060724_steelydan.jpg
WHERE THE TITTIES AT

TOMBOT, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:00 (eighteen years ago)

i once knew a serial cheater and could never figure out why he didn't just leave his wife.

people want their cake and eat it, fear of upheaval/insecurity. at the end of the day, cold as it is, his wife was a failsafe? i would've thought he would leave if he actually didn't find her attractive in any way at all (not even as company) tho.

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:00 (eighteen years ago)

alkiecat there are some threads on ILM with Geir on them if you want to go and unruin those in the meantime also...

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:01 (eighteen years ago)

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/217/492609601_b1f477e55d.jpg

Jordan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:03 (eighteen years ago)

blueski, if you get peevish they will come. The lolcats and the posters!

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:04 (eighteen years ago)

a relative of mine had a long-term relationship with a woman whose alcoholic husband was well aware of him. she didn't want to leave her husband because he'd basically drink himself to death without someone to watch over him, but my relative didn't seem to mind too much because i suspect he never wanted full commitment anyway. kids were involved too, somehow. some pople lead needlessly complex lives, is the conclusion i think!

CharlieNo4, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:05 (eighteen years ago)

i prefer cats to dick-waving about who's the most grown-up/morally relativistic.

That one guy that quit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:06 (eighteen years ago)

i prefer fucking other peoples girlfriends

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:07 (eighteen years ago)

i once knew a german girl who went to her sister's wedding and was privy to some marriage advice their grandmother was sharing: "don't take a lover until at least a year has passed"

and the other night i was joking around with the lovely Emma B about some dude she was looking at, creating a whole fantasy affair she was having - the kind of silly thing couples do sometimes - and she was like "oh no it's much too soon for that!" and though she was kidding i could tell that there's something in the water between europe and here, i think

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:07 (eighteen years ago)

my preference: thread locked 1 hour ago

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:08 (eighteen years ago)

Fair point re. needlessly complicated.

We can have two threads combined. Every time you post a joky reponse you are cheating on the lolcats and vice versa.

This thread doesn't need to be locked. People need to stop clicking it perhaps...

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:08 (eighteen years ago)

Tracer when u say 'here'....where r u?

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:09 (eighteen years ago)

ILX IS NOT AMERICA

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:09 (eighteen years ago)

tho we all wish it were

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:09 (eighteen years ago)

this thread needs more gedge.

grimly fiendish, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:11 (eighteen years ago)

i am not on "the continent", is what i mean

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:11 (eighteen years ago)

WTF @ all this! You crazy ppl etc etc...

Pashmina, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:11 (eighteen years ago)

i wonder if there really is more cheating on the continent? is it just part of the anglo view of them, like rubbish police and paedo belgians?

That one guy that quit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:13 (eighteen years ago)

They need something to do in between cooking elaborate meals and being cowards.

Matt DC, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:14 (eighteen years ago)

all i can say here is that guilt is a NASTY thing, period.

Surmounter, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:14 (eighteen years ago)

i think it's cobblers. apart from those cheatalians amirite.

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:14 (eighteen years ago)

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/136/400076762_15fc3c739f.jpg?v=0

alkie cat, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:15 (eighteen years ago)

Drinking wine surely fills the empty hours!

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:15 (eighteen years ago)

Oh wow, xpost and ting

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:15 (eighteen years ago)

Thread was totally worth it for Morally Relatavistic Cat.

Matt DC, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:15 (eighteen years ago)

i thought that one was weak.

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:15 (eighteen years ago)

i guess if i discount my personal experience with germans and french for whom cheating is more common, then yes

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:16 (eighteen years ago)

Tracer Hand = Deuce Bigalow

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:16 (eighteen years ago)

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i191/fluxion23/DOORCAT.jpg

kenan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:17 (eighteen years ago)

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/190/492603032_187f2b00bb.jpg

dan m, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:18 (eighteen years ago)

Funny or not, my cat really is morally relativistic.

Jordan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:18 (eighteen years ago)

haha kv_nol i didn't mean it like that!

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:19 (eighteen years ago)

the lovely Emma B has also told me advice that her (French) mother gave her: if you ever cheat on your partner, never EVER tell them

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:20 (eighteen years ago)

she aytee aytee

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:23 (eighteen years ago)

wrong

Jordan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:25 (eighteen years ago)

b/c they'll probably find out anyway and it'll be that much worse

Jordan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:25 (eighteen years ago)

she should never, however, have told me that she received this advice

xpost

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:26 (eighteen years ago)

if they find out anyway, just deny it. even if the evidence is right there. even if you're caught in the act.

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:26 (eighteen years ago)

Jordan otm -- if ur serious, that's a big secret to keep for, you know, half a century.

That one guy that quit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:27 (eighteen years ago)

shaggy.jpeg

kv_nol, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:27 (eighteen years ago)

that's a big secret to keep for, you know, half a century

what, are you going to explode? that's some jiminy cricket thinking.

kenan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:28 (eighteen years ago)

Jordan, i have been the one to be told i was being cheated on and it did absolutely 0 good to anyone, except maybe the cheater's sense of guilt and shame, which was relieved somewhat by feeling she had been truthful to me

bascially if you're at the point where you feel like you need to fess up about cheating on your partner, then it's time to split up. and if you're going to split up anyway, what good would it do to compound the badness of it by revealing your infidelity?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:29 (eighteen years ago)

what, are you going to explode? that's some jiminy cricket thinking.

-- kenan, Thursday, May 10, 2007 7:28 PM (49 seconds ago)


i don't understand either of those sentences.

That one guy that quit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:30 (eighteen years ago)

i.e. fessing up is a SELFISH thing to do because the only person it helps is yourself if you're feeling guilty; it hurts everyone else

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:31 (eighteen years ago)

Not OTM, I don't think you can generalize about this shit. I know a couple who were married for 10 years, 1 partner cheated and came clean out of guilt. They had problems but didn't want to split up, and they worked through it and are better than before.

Jordan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:34 (eighteen years ago)

No, I would prefer to be told rather than to find out myself. At least that's an honest, coming clean kind of thing, and this -- "where you feel like you need to fess up about cheating on your partner, then it's time to split up" makes no sense to me at all.

Jordan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:35 (eighteen years ago)

Tracer OTM, I think, altho obv this situational stuff.

Relationships all have rocky bits in which people are motivated to go outside the relship for support, companionship, and sometimes sex. This is either a) something that needs to be changed/resolved with the relationship to keep it going, hopefully in a better state, or b) something that cannot be changed if the relationship is to continue, but it's worthwhile to one or both partners for other reasons and cheating once or occasionally allows one partner to be emotionally faithful. I'm not promoting this view at all, but it's certainly comprehensible.

Laurel, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:38 (eighteen years ago)

i can't help but see it as a weakness on the cheated partner's side if they stay with the cheater, to add to the unfairness!

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:39 (eighteen years ago)

jordan that's great about that couple. my question is, though, in what way did coming clean about it help anything? why not just stop the affair, shut up about it, and move on?

i can definitely understand wanting to be told by your partner rather than finding out yourself. but those aren't the only two options. what about the other one - you not ever knowing? you make that sound impossible but it's not at all actually.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)

xpost to jordan

hmm. i think tracer's totally OTM. but that's the wonder of relationships. i mean, if there was one great model that worked for everyone, don't you think some fucker would be getting very, very rich off it right now?

grimly fiendish, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)

The success or failure of either a OR b of course depends on the partners' starting perspective w/r/t infidelity, and some possible cultural differences have already reared their heads here. Etc etc blah blah blah

Laurel, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)

Wow like x5 xpost JUST POST ALREADY

Laurel, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:41 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.jonco48.com/blog/Dr_Phil_McGraw_small.jpg

alkie cat, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:41 (eighteen years ago)

jordan otm again -- also if you DON'T split up and it's a secret you have to keep, it'll do harm in ways you can't predict. plus splitting up without any "probable cause" could take you into weird territory too.

shut up + move on might work, might not. i think that kind of thing can be really corrosive.

That one guy that quit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:41 (eighteen years ago)

Wow like x5 xpost JUST POST ALREADY

bring back no xpost notif!

blueski, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:42 (eighteen years ago)

Uh, because in both their situation and mine, it's not the actual cheating that's really the problem, it's some underlying unhappy shit that causes it in the first place. Is the cheating partner really going to be able to stop cheating, get their head straight and suddenly be happy in their relationship without even talking to their partner?

The whole point is that some serious talking and working things out needs to happen, which ideally would've happened before anyone cheated but sometimes it takes something big like that to start talking.

Jordan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:44 (eighteen years ago)

Sure it's corrosive if you're carrying around a huge burden of guilt all the time etc or secretly lording it over your partner or etc, and the cheated-on party will prob eventually guess that there's something wrong so that's self-defeating anyway! But if you know your reasons for going outside the rel'ship and you end the behavior and either starting working on the motivating factors or admit that the motivational conditions are non-negotiable, some people, under some conditions, may be able to go on just fine.

Laurel, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:45 (eighteen years ago)

i.e. fessing up is a SELFISH thing to do because the only person it helps is yourself if you're feeling guilty; it hurts everyone else

this absolves the cheater of any responsibility for his or her actions, though! which is a sweet deal, if you're that kind of person, but really isn't the point, surely?

CharlieNo4, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:46 (eighteen years ago)

this absolves the cheater of any responsibility for his or her actions, though

Uh, I fail to see how this is the case.

Jordan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:47 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.creators.com/comics/37/4643_thumb.gif

kenan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:50 (eighteen years ago)

shut up + move on might work, might not. i think that kind of thing can be really corrosive.

yeah, it could be. so could the knowledge that your partner cheated on you.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:52 (eighteen years ago)

it's a game-changer either way.

That one guy that quit, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:54 (eighteen years ago)

Uh, I fail to see how this is the case.

um. ok, let me see if i can do this without sounding like a fuckstick.

the main reason people with a propensity to cheat, choose not to do so, is because they don't want either a. to get caught or b. to suffer the consequences of getting caught, be they violence or a break-up or even just an argument or whatever.

ergo, if you follow the "never tell" line, that person described above can merrily fuck everything that moves without ever having to deal with the havoc it *ought to be* causing.

does that make sense?

CharlieNo4, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:55 (eighteen years ago)

no.

kenan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)

ought to be? Why, because of Jesus?

kenan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)

You can't build nuclear weapons and not use them, because then you are avoiding responsibility for the destruction you *ought to be* causing.

kenan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 16:58 (eighteen years ago)

Basicially if you're at the point where you feel like you need to fess up about cheating on your partner, then it's time to split up.

Or maybe they feel the need to solve the problem, to rescue the relationship. Maybe they know they were wrong. This is why I hate these simplistic Hollywood lala explanations: "he cheated, throw him out!" I always hate it when (wo)men say this (just as much as they claim they would never remain in an abusive relationship, uh, how the fuck would you know?). Love is never ever simple. People are never a perfect match and relationships need to be worked at. If you're so readily willing to throw him/her out because they cheated on, how much love do you have for that person? Are you that unwilling to see that noone (incl yourself) is perfect.

Shit, return to crazzeee jpeg mode now.

stevienixed, Thursday, 10 May 2007 17:06 (eighteen years ago)

(Which doesn't mean there are assholes out there who cheat and should be thrown out pronto.)

stevienixed, Thursday, 10 May 2007 17:06 (eighteen years ago)

jesus, this thread. THE TERROR OF FREEDOM. love the action of groping and grappling for standards while saying there aren't and can't be any.

gff, Thursday, 10 May 2007 17:12 (eighteen years ago)

stevie i didn't mean that if you cheat you need to break up! i meant that if the sleeper-arounder feels like it's such a crisis in their relationship that they need to confess it to their partner, knowing the pain to their partner that will inevitably result from this conversation, then it's like, i dunno - maybe the partnership isn't right for them. however, if the sleeper-arounder decides to keep schtum and take all the guilt on themselves, rather than spill the beans - i don't know. to me, personally, that indicates more of a desire to keep the relationship going.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)

i mean, when i was told by my girlfriend of two years that she had cheated on me not once but twice over the previous year, i fucking forgave her! honestly! she didn't even see those people any more, not even as friends. they lived in other towns. we continued to have all kinds of fun together. there was no distance or coldness. but deep down i think she wanted out. and when i didn't immediately break up - or at least give her the cold shoulder for a few days - i think she got sort of disappointed. she may have even lost respect for me, after my instant forgiveness.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 17:26 (eighteen years ago)

isn't the real problem with cheating not so much the act, but doing it while expecting the other person to remain faithful to you? it's not allowing an equal access to resources!

i mean, if you "cheat" and then expect the other person to "cheat" too, then you're not really in a "relationship" (by any normal definition) tho you may have an arrangement of some sort.

(I find talk of "love" and all that a bit misleading here because what is in question is not feelings but acts)

ryan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)

even the word "cheat" implies a sort of economic agreement is being broken for goodness sake!

ryan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 17:30 (eighteen years ago)

"Being the other man/woman" overlaps with "cheating," but is not equal to it. And it's not cheating if it's not against the rules.

Douglas, Thursday, 10 May 2007 19:03 (eighteen years ago)

Being the other man/woman" overlaps with "cheating," but is not equal to it.

no but it is equal to being a douchebag. i had the opportunity to be the third man in (for lack of a better term and because hockey playoffs are on my mind) this past weekend but had to back out when i found out she had a boyfriend. then i found out who her boyfriend was and for a split second thought i'd do it anyway because i kind of don't like the guy. but as much of an dickhead as i am, i don't think i could consciously be that kind of douchebag.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 10 May 2007 19:16 (eighteen years ago)

i think she got sort of disappointed. she may have even lost respect for me, after my instant forgiveness.

-- Tracer Hand, Thursday, 10 May 2007 17:26 (3 hours ago)


absolutely, instant forgiveness is never good

696, Thursday, 10 May 2007 21:11 (eighteen years ago)

Ill be the other woman
All your life
Just as long as I am the only one
Other than your wife
Your wife how would she feel
If she caught us together
The same way I would feel
if I caught you with another

Home I know comes first
And second to that Ill be
When youre not there with her
I want you right here with me

Ill be the other woman
Just as long as I know
Im the only other woman
You make love to
Ill be the other woman
But Ive got to know
Im the only other woman
You make love to

The neighbors are whispering
Saying that you dont care
If you cheat on your wife for me
Youll cheat on me for someone else
Ill be your part time love
But thats as far as Ill go
To be your part time fool
Would be stooping a little too low
Loving a married man
This I really dont mind
But a married Casanova
Is a little out of my line

Ill be the other woman
Just as long as I know
Im the only other woman
You make love to
Ill be the other woman
long as I know
Im the only other woman
Ill open doors for you baby
long as I know
Im the only other woman
you make love to
Ill be your part time love
Ive got to know
Im the only other woman
you make love to
Oh yes I will
Yes I will

admrl, Thursday, 10 May 2007 21:12 (eighteen years ago)

A doctor once misread my mother's test results and suggested that maybe one of my parents had been unfaithful. Moms was like "Sweetie, we have four kids, two dogs, our own start-up engineering firm, and a hundred year-old house. We don't have time to sleep with EACH OTHER, much less someone else. Now, let's look at that chart again." Awww, Mom. :D

Laurel, Thursday, 10 May 2007 21:25 (eighteen years ago)

that doctor got sonned in a busy mom beef.

admrl, Thursday, 10 May 2007 21:26 (eighteen years ago)

your mom can think on her toes, something both she and the milk man are glad about.

chicago kevin, Thursday, 10 May 2007 21:28 (eighteen years ago)

"milk man" was actually just his cute nickname.

kenan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 21:33 (eighteen years ago)

Well actually you'd think a DOCTOR would suspect natural bodily processes before aberrant ones, but I guess it's more exciting to insist that you know more about someone's home life than they do...

Laurel, Thursday, 10 May 2007 21:40 (eighteen years ago)

Play on, playaz.

Eazy, Thursday, 10 May 2007 21:57 (eighteen years ago)

HATE THE GAME

kenan, Thursday, 10 May 2007 21:58 (eighteen years ago)

stevie i didn't mean that if you cheat you need to break up!

Oh sorry! I know you didn't imply this. I was being overly sensitive and it was more a reaction against what people say in the media (and friends of mine):"He cheated? Throw him out!"

nathalie, Friday, 11 May 2007 12:02 (eighteen years ago)

and besides, i'm tired of going to the same house every night. why, jancy, that house has only got seven rooms in it, and every damn one of them is cluttered up with overstuffed furniture!

696, Friday, 11 May 2007 12:05 (eighteen years ago)

three years pass...

i dont kno if i could ever b this

i like lucy (surm), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:34 (fourteen years ago)

depends on the situation- are the "other" man/woman if the couple have an open relationship?

or does the "other woman"/"other man" status imply that this is a secret?

makes a big difference I think

even though an outside partner can have a destructive effect on a partnership even when things are open- it always depends upon what the encounters mean to the people involved

the tune is space, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:50 (fourteen years ago)

if you are looking for some sex or a bit of a laugh and definitely don't like the person, prob fine.

if you like the person, don't even let them tell you they fancy you until they're single.

I see what this is (Local Garda), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:52 (fourteen years ago)

there is someone who is in a committed relationship who's commitment is out of town, and he is texting me ... :/

i like lucy (surm), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:54 (fourteen years ago)

i don't know them well but still

i like lucy (surm), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:55 (fourteen years ago)

i know they're not open

i like lucy (surm), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:55 (fourteen years ago)

xpost oops- should have said are you the "other man" etc.

if you are into this person but don't wanna homewreck or keep secrets, then it's fair to bring it up openly

the tune is space, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:57 (fourteen years ago)

he's so cuuuuuuuuute

i like lucy (surm), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:58 (fourteen years ago)

are you friends with both halves of the relationship? or just the one who is texting you?

the tune is space, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 23:03 (fourteen years ago)

don't.

goole, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 23:03 (fourteen years ago)

good question dr3w. just the one who is texting. that's the thing.

i like lucy (surm), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 23:07 (fourteen years ago)

serious dick move if you do this surm, so don't

ex-heroin addict tricycle (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 23:07 (fourteen years ago)

and the other thing is that we've been e-flirting for like MONTHS now (and by flirting i mean gay flirting which is worse)

i like lucy (surm), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 23:08 (fourteen years ago)

ok ok :(

i like lucy (surm), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 23:08 (fourteen years ago)

yeah, if it was an open relationship then that's one thing, but if it's not, you're going to feel weird about it

this is not to say it wouldn't be hot, but there's more to life than hot sex-

the tune is space, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 23:13 (fourteen years ago)

says the man who has been on an unusual streak of lucky lately

i like lucy (surm), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 23:14 (fourteen years ago)

no i hear you. but it's like, i'm not getting any younger here. shouldn't i do something like this while i'm still young and can pull off being bad? i know, dumb question.

i like lucy (surm), Tuesday, 1 February 2011 23:16 (fourteen years ago)

I mean, you felt weird enough about it to post here- if you were basically able to successfully rationalize it then you would not have done that-

so I think you wanted to be talked out of it

you could always hang out with him but not have sex and just masochistically flirt/tease each other, too, y'know

the tune is space, Tuesday, 1 February 2011 23:18 (fourteen years ago)

I had the possibility of being this fairly recently, and my gut reaction was to run like the fucking wind. I wasn't all that into the girl though, don't know what I would've done if I had been.

Being only friends with one half of the couple definitely makes it somewhat better, still will almost certainly lead to bad messy things IMO. If you're willing to go through those to be with someone, go for it... Just for sex though? Nah.

Inevitable stupid dubstep mix (chap), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 00:58 (fourteen years ago)

don't do it, you'll lose your baby

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOrPz0i0fMs

buzza, Wednesday, 2 February 2011 01:13 (fourteen years ago)

yeah don't do it surm. Ending up in that situation without knowing is different to knowing and doing it anyway. You're a senstive, good person imo...I don't think you need sex badly enough to do that to someone you've never met. And those situations are never, ever clean and easy to get out of. Who the hell knows how it ends once you start.

thus endeth the lecture. :D

VegemiteGrrrl, Wednesday, 2 February 2011 01:37 (fourteen years ago)

and I really, really don't like the people in these relationships who initiate these kinds of hookups. #moralhighhorse

VegemiteGrrrl, Wednesday, 2 February 2011 01:39 (fourteen years ago)

ok i'm not doing it.

i like lucy (surm), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 03:25 (fourteen years ago)

<3

VegemiteGrrrl, Wednesday, 2 February 2011 03:53 (fourteen years ago)

I mean obv if you have been reading gaythread you will know that I am going to say DO NOT DO THIS, YOU MIGHT FEEL FINE NOW AND THEN GUILTY 2 WKS LATER

vienn?tta (Stevie D(eux)), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 04:15 (fourteen years ago)

development:

we didn't do it

but the bf found our IM conversations and now knows the intent was there

my friend is fucked :(

i like lucy (surm), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 05:49 (fourteen years ago)

damn

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 2 February 2011 05:49 (fourteen years ago)

That was an awfully quick turnabout for the books. Oh dear :(

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 05:56 (fourteen years ago)

he feels really bad. he's a good guy. it's sad. monogamy is weird.

i like lucy (surm), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 05:59 (fourteen years ago)

best possible outcome

dr more bs (jeff), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 06:19 (fourteen years ago)

I don't think monogamy is the issue, but being honest, straight-forward, and trustworthy are great qualities to have not only in life, but in your relationships.

Deception is way weirder than monogamy.

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 06:20 (fourteen years ago)

shasta otm

VegemiteGrrrl, Wednesday, 2 February 2011 06:21 (fourteen years ago)

i acknowledge that honesty is the issue, but there would be no need for deception if monogamy weren't such an issue for so many people. i don't think deception is weirder than monogamy. i think they're both just as weird.

i like lucy (surm), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 06:24 (fourteen years ago)

there's no need to turn this into a conversation about whether or not my friend was in the wrong. the answer to that is obvious. all i'm saying is i constantly marvel at how much drama the issue of monogamy causes.

i like lucy (surm), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 06:26 (fourteen years ago)

I have been the other flan

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 06:34 (fourteen years ago)

and I am always searching for another flan

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 06:35 (fourteen years ago)

there's no difference between good flan and bad flan

My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 06:44 (fourteen years ago)

flan stans the lot of you

VegemiteGrrrl, Wednesday, 2 February 2011 06:46 (fourteen years ago)

Monogamy isn't weird in a committed healthy longterm relationship. It seems perfectly natural to me. Monogamy maybe difficult in unhealthy / failing relationships?

Super Cub, Wednesday, 2 February 2011 07:35 (fourteen years ago)

If I'm getting with someone, and that someone is already in a relationship, I think it's their responsibility to deal with that, not mine. I don't think it's a case of collective responsibility at all.

Obviously if you're friends with all the parties involved then it changes things around somewhat.

전승 Complete Victory (in Battle) (NotEnough), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 09:54 (fourteen years ago)

The monogamy debate is a long hard one (fnarr). I think monogamy's hella weird, even speaking as someone in a committed healthy long-term relationship. But "it's a possibly artificial structure imposed by society" or whatever doesn't give you an excuse to break someone's heart.

If I'm getting with someone, and that someone is already in a relationship, I think it's their responsibility to deal with that, not mine. I don't think it's a case of collective responsibility at all.

If you're going to take this rampantly individualist view, perhaps it is their responsibility/duty not to hurt the other person, but isn't it your responsibility to yourself not to act like a reprehensible dickhead?

Anyway, surm, I'm glad you didn't do it.

emil.y, Wednesday, 2 February 2011 12:00 (fourteen years ago)

If you're single and the interested party is not, your singleness never absolves you of the requirement to respect any known third party, who is being massively disrespected by a partner who is putting themselves on the cheater's continuum. Generally, the more longwinded the rationalization on the part of the attached person claiming their monogamous relationship is actually open, the higher chance of it being bullshit - and in any case, it's easy for someone to slag off a flagging partner to a person who will never meet them and for me, it never reflects well on the speaker. Personally, if I were the notional singleton here I would be mortified at the thought of being an accessory to something I'd never do if I was in a relationship - no matter how much the relationship might suck, you deal yourself a rotten karmic hand if you aren't brave enough to end it and be alone before starting something new. Of course, people's relationships are all different but the person you owe a bit of vetting time to see if all is kosher or not is, ultimately, yourself.

champagne in the arse (suzy), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 12:26 (fourteen years ago)

Relationships and the emotions of the parties involved are extremely complicated and mixed up and sometimes situations get blurry and things happen that shouldn't. I mean, not that this is news to anyone but it's life and shit happens. I think people are often really quick to cast aspersions on hypothetical situations or people/situations they actually know nothing about. I'm not saying that cheating or deception on the part of someone in a relationship is OK by any means, just that things are rarely as black and white as they might seem to an outsider. There have been other threads like this and people are really quick to get high and mighty. That said, I do think Suzy is right and that absolving yourself of all responsibility as the 3rd party is complete bullshit and a very strange view to take.

ENBB, Wednesday, 2 February 2011 12:45 (fourteen years ago)

live and let live, on the other hand, booo...

Mark G, Wednesday, 2 February 2011 12:47 (fourteen years ago)

I don't think that surm had any moral responsibility to avoid this out of fear of cuckolding the guy or whatever, but the way I think about it is this: sometimes people shoot other people over instances of cheating. That's just the way it is and sometimes it's the quiet ones. I wouldn't get teary-eyed about hurting some guy's feelings, but I also wouldn't even pull some shit like this if I expected the other guy would so much as key my car. It's an issue of self-preservation.

kkvgz, Wednesday, 2 February 2011 12:49 (fourteen years ago)

In Surm's particular situation I think he did the "right" thing too for many many reasons. It sounds like this dude was just horny and wanted a piece of ass while his SO is out of town and that sort of behavior/motivation is almost always creepy and gross.

ENBB, Wednesday, 2 February 2011 12:53 (fourteen years ago)

my two:

it isn't a situation I like to cast judgement on because it's not something I'd have to deal with, and therefore I can't say with any level of confidence that if it were me, that I'd have the willpower to say "no" on moral grounds. I might, I might not...I don't know.

With that said, I don't think it matters whether you know the other person or not. I got in a heated argument about this on FB with some dude who was acting holier than thou on the other side of the arg.

I've seen people say (in this thread and out) that it isn't your responsibility to respect the relationship, but imo that's bullshit. If you're aware that someone is spoken for, and not in an open relationship, and you choose to cavort with them, you're going to be causing someone anguish (and probably more than one person).

A lot of it also depends on context, ie, who initiated the proceedings. If you're initiating things with the taken party, then that's pretty reprehensible. If they approach you first, well then it's more difficult for sure. With me personally, though, no matter what action I chose, I know I'd have an image of the third party that was getting fucked over in my head, and that would bother me a lot.

There are situations where someone who is already spoken for falls in love with someone else, and IMO that's a completely different scenario, as it happens, and it's hard to control. But even in those situations, an open and honest conversation should be had to explain this, rather than sneaking behind their back.

so I hafta say suzy otm in this thread.

felching in the dark (San Te), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 12:59 (fourteen years ago)

first sentence should say "something I've HAD to deal with" -- ie, it hasn't happened to me yet.

felching in the dark (San Te), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 12:59 (fourteen years ago)

also by "some dude" i mean literally 'some dude' and not al. lol

felching in the dark (San Te), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 13:00 (fourteen years ago)

ST otm.

ENBB, Wednesday, 2 February 2011 13:03 (fourteen years ago)

Generally it's our responsibility to put as little bad shit out into the world as possib, right? Everybody has their bad-shit weaknesses and it's not really all that useful to argue about which are badder, although I suppose I do personally think that gradations exist. But anyway.

Getting in between two other people, even if one of them put you there, is bad shit that you and world just do not need. Glad you felt the same, surm. :)

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 2 February 2011 14:51 (fourteen years ago)

f I'm getting with someone, and that someone is already in a relationship, I think it's their responsibility to deal with that, not mine. I don't think it's a case of collective responsibility at all.

See, when my bf cheated on me last year and then dumped me for that girl - who is a friend of us both and knew perfectly well we were a long term couple - EVERYONE said to me "dont be angry at her be angry at your BF".
Fuck that shit. I was angry at them BOTH. It takes two people to say yes, for christs sake.

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 00:32 (fourteen years ago)

!! oh man so sorry Trayce. I've been there. I forgave the one who asked for forgiveness after they split. The other one is dead to me.

bien-pensant vibe (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 3 February 2011 00:38 (fourteen years ago)

but he's so cuuuuuuuuute

dr more bs (jeff), Thursday, 3 February 2011 00:54 (fourteen years ago)

Shakey - thanks. I'm over it now and in fact on good terms with the ex again - but I cant bring myself to go places I know they'll both be, which has been ruinous for my social life because she's friends with basically everybody I know and they all think she's the bees knees :(

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 00:56 (fourteen years ago)

(that is of course my choice, but still)

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 00:56 (fourteen years ago)

god, that sucks Trayce.

re: monogamy conversation upthread. I'm sure I'll sound like a jerk here...this is not really in reference to anything that's been specifically said, just something I sort of feel and has been rattling around in my head:

as far as cheating goes, monogamy doesn't have anything to do with it, imo. I don't think I really care about it one way or another...but the whole "monogamy is weird anyway so w/e" idea seems like a rationalization. There's no 'ideal state' for human relationships, because we complicate EVERYthing. The only way to navigate any of it, any kind of relationship at all, is to just, well, be good to each other. Everyone deserves to be treated decently, whether they're adhering to some perceived imposition of monogamy or running around with 9 wives or sleeping with the neighboring swingers. We need to care about each other.

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 01:02 (fourteen years ago)

Yeah basically thats what it boils down to hey.

I mean I cant talk. I have cheated on partners. I rationalised it at the time in various ways ("its a LDR and I never see him"/"I've been unhappy for months and we'll probably break up") but it still wasn't the right thing to do. Even if, maybe, I confess a microscopic prickle of delight in taboo things like it, sometimes.

I'm sure we all do if we're honest.

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 01:04 (fourteen years ago)

I always go over this in my head and I'm always hoping that the outcome will be that he'll pick me over the other woman instead of the usual "I have to run off with her, she's my soulmate!".
I recently read an article stating that this situation has to do with a guy's lack of emotional growth or refusal to "grow up", so he usually runs off with a younger girl. It was part of a university professor's lengthy study of why young women get into relationships with older men.

Has No Shame (MintIce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 01:56 (fourteen years ago)

That could be argued from either gender I think, because I suspect it's one chasing one's youth in general.

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 02:13 (fourteen years ago)

i wasn't saying that monogamy is weird as a rationalization for anyone's behavior -- i simply genuinely believe that monogamy is strange. i just cannot imagine getting that upset about it. that's just me.

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 03:16 (fourteen years ago)

in conversations like these, i think there's a difference between making excuses for something and establishing the reasons for something. they are very different things.

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 03:19 (fourteen years ago)

do i believe that monogamy sets people up for failure? perhaps, in certain situations. is that an excuse for cheating? no.

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 03:30 (fourteen years ago)

Are you taking the stance that monogamy is a social contstruct we feel obliged to stick to, or something people do by choice? I mean I like to think it's mostly the latter for people, that they dearly want dedication with somoene who is dedicated to, and adores, them ahead of anything else.

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 03:35 (fourteen years ago)

i think it is both. it is a social construct, AND we want that sort of dedication. part of wanting it comes from the construct, part of it is instinctual. i also believe there are many ways of dedicating yourself to someone wholly in the absence of sexual exclusivity.

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 03:36 (fourteen years ago)

at the same time, jealousy is something a lot of people just can't get around. i totally understand.

it just seems like monogamy is the assumption that is considered correct, or automatic, and sometimes this causes problems. i guess it just boils down to being in agreement, which is, like, really hard.

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 03:42 (fourteen years ago)

I kind of wish I felt more like you do! Its hard when you become so attached to someone and cant leave room for possibilities.

Which is weird, because I now live with my ex bf, and I love him dearly - I love him completely unconditionally and I'd jump in front of a bus for him, tbh - but I have no problem with the fact we're just companions now and he has other gfs and i have other bfs.

Which is weird and confusing but not unpleasant!

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 03:59 (fourteen years ago)

surm OTM, mostly.

i mean, in my experience my friends in open/poly relationships are about as successful as my friends in monogamous relationships, but part of me thinks that deviating from the 'standard model' might force you to really think through and be conscious of what the exact dynamics of yr relationship are, and ideally communicate when figuring it out. like...monogamy is easily assumed enough that it lets you not interrogate yr relationship in a variety of other ways.

(i say this as someone who is in a monogamous relationship at the moment, but nonetheless)

Alex in Montreal, Thursday, 3 February 2011 04:30 (fourteen years ago)

its a sick lifestyle for sick people dont fool yourselves

My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic (Princess TamTam), Thursday, 3 February 2011 04:34 (fourteen years ago)

Not that I at all want to give any leverage to what you just said I want to make it clear I'm not in a poly relationship. I'm not in a relationship at all with anyone.

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 04:43 (fourteen years ago)

i wasn't suggesting you were Trayce - I was just speaking broadly + in response to surm's posts, and thinking aloud. and i'm presuming-slash-hoping that TamTam is being vaguely tongue in cheek. relationships are far too complicated for me or anyone else to be making broad statements about what works in *every* situation.

Alex in Montreal, Thursday, 3 February 2011 04:58 (fourteen years ago)

i think it is both. it is a social construct, AND we want that sort of dedication. part of wanting it comes from the construct, part of it is instinctual. i also believe there are many ways of dedicating yourself to someone wholly in the absence of sexual exclusivity.

― i like lucy (surm), Wednesday, February 2, 2011 10:36 PM Bookmark

I think this kind of gets at the misleading nature of the term "social construct" in a lot of contexts. I.e. just because it's a "social construct" doesn't mean you can just think your way out of it, because we come to expect certain things as norms and learn to react to things certain ways and there can be very real emotional consequences for some people when those norms are violated or expectations aren't met.

hey boys, suppers on me, our video just went bacterial (Hurting 2), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:05 (fourteen years ago)

Alex: nah I more meant tamtam than you, but all good :)

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:11 (fourteen years ago)

Sure. And thus you figure out whether you're the kind of person for whom these social constructs are incredibly meaningful or whether they're less central to how you deal with things, and you model your interactions with other people accordingly.

The point of calling something a 'social construct' isn't to deny the real power that it exerts, but to highlight that it isn't the only possibility.

Alex in Montreal, Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:13 (fourteen years ago)

I mean....race, gender and sexually are all socially constructed and all have very very very real and practical impacts. But giving yourself the power to conceptualize them as less than 'mandatory' categories gives you the freedom to approach them in different ways and deal with the sometimes profoundly negative impacts of such essentializing in new and creative ways, right?

Recognizing that these ideas can and DO change lets us at the very least begin to examine them. Re: 'monogamy' - you're telling me it meant the same thing in the 30s or 40s or 50s as it does now? Marriage and monogamous/committed relationships at one time were mostly about controlling the sexual behaviour of women via marriage, while their husbands were....freer under the veneer of monogamy to do as they pleased, somewhat. That doesn't mean that monogamy is bad or meaningless but it certainly is a set of expectations whose application is anything but consistent over the course of modern history.

Alex in Montreal, Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:18 (fourteen years ago)

Yes, both those sides I had in mind too, well put. Its somethign I've pondered a lot tbh. I hated it when I was cheated on, but Ive cheated on people. Am I a hypocrite? Or just human?

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:19 (fourteen years ago)

Imo, if people can't handle monogamy, they don't have to. There are plenty of polyamorous people out there (I'm best friends with one), and at least the expectations are set up front.

felching in the dark (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:20 (fourteen years ago)

xp (this is now way off topic for this thread, because i'm still a pretty conservative moralist re: being the other man/woman. if someone has voluntarily decided to be part of a committed monogamous relationship, while you still aren't responsible for their behaviour, empathy and prudence if nothing else demand that you respect that.)

Alex in Montreal, Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:22 (fourteen years ago)

xp Yeah, San Te, that was my point, basically.

Alex in Montreal, Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:23 (fourteen years ago)

yes yes it's all true, i just sometimes wonder how many ppl enter these monogamous relationships not thinking how hard it is gonna be.

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:27 (fourteen years ago)

i have witnessed this firsthand with more than a few amigos.

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:28 (fourteen years ago)

Well it aint easy at all...in my last relationship I got tempted a lot. Its hard.

But its also easy for me to be loyal because I'm more introverted and am not in serious relationships as often...but obv my situation is not everyone elses.

The thing is, temptation isn't a sin, but if you aren't open and don't talk through such problems, there's a higher chance of things getting sketchy.

felching in the dark (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:32 (fourteen years ago)

But surm, you make it sound like monogamy is some impossible thing, when really for most people it just isnt.

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:32 (fourteen years ago)

i do make it sound like that, you're right, and that can't be accurate. but like ... isn't it a LOT harder than most ppl care to admit? or talk about?

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:34 (fourteen years ago)

yeah, maybe that's more of it...that people don't think about the work that goes into a good relationship, and it becomes a garbage in/garbage out equation for a lot people who only skate around the surface of it. That's not to say that you are guaranteed "success" by putting in that work, you can still get hurt or have things end badly, but it does bother me that people don't always approach relationships with the kind of care and forethought and openness that is needed. It's weird. Years of human existence, among the same mistakes over and over and ... Lol.

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:36 (fourteen years ago)

oops that was a few xposts ago.

But still kind of applicable, I guess.

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:37 (fourteen years ago)

omg i feel like i'm on some sort of slut brigade

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:41 (fourteen years ago)

monogamy is hard. No one should ever say that it isn't. And maybe thats why it is not for everyone. You have to know yourself pretty well going in, and you have to be willing to learn about your failings as you go...it becomes a process of weaving your weaknesses with your partners strengths, picking each other up when the other falls and not so much beig selfless as thinking about two people, not just one. I don't think you can have a good monogamous relationship just going about it the way you went about single life...together is different, and you have to be willing to adjust. People want it to be a certain way, but the reality is often that you have to make it work, it doesnt just magically come together after a few years or months of being in love.

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:44 (fourteen years ago)

and I am not at all directing any of this at anyone, surm or anyone here, and if what I say sounds lecturey or judgemental that's not my intent. I'm just sharing how I have approached this myself, and speaking personally I'm monogamous, have been my whole loge but I have never had thie confidence or mindset to go after other partners or felt that I needed that, so my view is pretty limited.

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:47 (fourteen years ago)

Loge? Life, ugh .

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:47 (fourteen years ago)

loge!!

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:48 (fourteen years ago)

And I grew up with parents who were essentially in a loveless marriage so I'm not mindlessly stanning for monogamy. I think seeing what my parents had just made me more apt to rule out what I didn't want in a relationship, and only commit when I felt like I was getting something I truly wanted, and not just someone who paid attention to me (that took a LOT of learning)

oversharing now. Sorry for derailing.

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:51 (fourteen years ago)

Monogamy is hard yeah, and of course everyone has times they're bored with their partner or see "the path not taken" or whatever. Some say we're not wired to have the one partner for life. That said I dont nesc. equate monogamy with "only one partner ever for life". I just mean when you *are* with someone, you're with them and just them.

Serial monogamy? Yeah thats my middle name baby.

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:51 (fourteen years ago)

i mean

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:54 (fourteen years ago)

when we're talking about monogamy here, we're talking about sexual monogamy right? cuz obv emotional and sexual monogamy are 2 different things, but when i think about monogamy, i mainly think about it sexually

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:54 (fourteen years ago)

... does that make sense?

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:55 (fourteen years ago)

sexual and emotional monogamy are the same thing to me. One person at a time. Not for life, but the person you are with is the person you're with.

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:57 (fourteen years ago)

i see. well, the difference btw the 2 is at the crux of my relationship with my boyfriend - he is the person i am like with. the only person. we both acknowledge that we cannot imagine sharing our lives with anyone else. but we can occasionally share a night with someone else.

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:59 (fourteen years ago)

Yeah its all part of the one package for me? Like if i had a bf and he slept with someone else but said he still loved me and no one else, I'd be... well not furious but certainly hurt and confused!

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 05:59 (fourteen years ago)

But again this brings it back to the deception thing.

If you're discussing it thats different.

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:00 (fourteen years ago)

yeah i mean that's like what the rules are

but you see how they can be very different, right?

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:00 (fourteen years ago)

I get it, and I can see how it works, but personally there's no way I could do that. Feels a bit like hair-splitting? I dunno. Hi I am a square, lol

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:02 (fourteen years ago)

i know - i mean it just begs the question of sex vs love. some ppl can't disentangle the two, and some ppl can

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:02 (fourteen years ago)

really gettin at the crux of the issues here folks, stay tuned

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:04 (fourteen years ago)

:::marie osmond nutri-system infomercial:::

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:04 (fourteen years ago)

I feel like you lose something by separating them? I dunno

But I love where this is going, learning a lot

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:05 (fourteen years ago)

Would I be way out of line saying this is something more common in gay circles? and I mean no disrespect by that but it just seems something a lot of my gay friends seem more comfy with?

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:07 (fourteen years ago)

yeah I was gonna say but didn't know quite how to raise it

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:09 (fourteen years ago)

omg no you're right!

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:10 (fourteen years ago)

i mean, there's probably something to the whole like wired for babies thing

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:10 (fourteen years ago)

and also men are dogs

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:11 (fourteen years ago)

i always wonder if that sort of separation isnt so much more common in gay circles as it more socially acceptable to be open abt

but like everything theres no hard & fast - i wld be devestated if my bf slept w/ someone else & hes feels the same. if i love a person thats it for me, its just them

Lamp, Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:12 (fourteen years ago)

yea I had a tough time with my g/f two exes ago because I was deeply in love w/ her but a mad amount of guys wanted her and tried (either under my nose or behind my back) to steal her from me. the thought of even the possibility of her cheating on me made me feel physically ill.

but it never happened, as she was very trustworthy in that regard.

felching in the dark (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:14 (fourteen years ago)

still miss her a lot but that's another story bleh

felching in the dark (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:14 (fourteen years ago)

Oh man, that makes me think of the "someone better will come along and steal my man cos why wouldnt they he's so awesome" thing I was plagued with like mad with the last one. Fuck my insecurities.

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:17 (fourteen years ago)

yea but it's understandable. people are pricks and they do shit and we are afraid they'll do shit to our loved one. i had a 'friend' (air quotes for sarcastic emphasis) who asked my g/f at the time if we were still dating (cuz he badly wanted her)...and he asked this standing 10 feet away from me.

she replied "YES, asshole!" to him, and that made me like her even more.

felching in the dark (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:20 (fourteen years ago)

i bristle at the suggestion that monogamy is somehow 'harder' to do than poly/open - the reason most people prefer to be monogamous is because it's easier, emotionally, logistically, etc., for a myriad of reasons that are really obvious if you just think about it

My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic (Princess TamTam), Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:29 (fourteen years ago)

good point tam tam

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 06:35 (fourteen years ago)

^^^

ENBB, Thursday, 3 February 2011 13:01 (fourteen years ago)

I mean yes, monogamy can be tough but I know that personally I could never be in an open relationship and the only ones I've seen that seem to work really well have involved gay men. I was friends with a married couple who were open and at one point propositioned me. Nothing ever even happened but the amount of drama that resulted (basically the other woman in their 3some got insanely jealous and flipped out) was ridiculous and ruined the friendship. Maybe it can work for some people but I can't really see how it's any easier.

ENBB, Thursday, 3 February 2011 13:12 (fourteen years ago)

i've seen it work for a few people but only in very limited and controlled doses.
An OPEN open relationship seems to mean "fucking you until i find someone who can cook and will show up if i'm hospitalized oh and do you want to catch a movie friday"

الله basedأكبر (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 3 February 2011 13:41 (fourteen years ago)

i have been with my boyfriend for about 9 years now. we have been open for a good amount of it, and our commitment is very strong and dear. but we are allowed to have sex with other people. and sometimes we do the 3way thing. but never have we once wanted to go out to dinner with anyone else. that's just how it is, he's the one. but we're both, like, guys.

i'm sure this is all on the open relationship thread but whatever.

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 15:21 (fourteen years ago)

also let it be said that the emotional stuff isn't really allowed with others. a certain amount of it you can't control, but

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 15:22 (fourteen years ago)

i will absolutely admit that i dunno how this works in a same sex relationship

الله basedأكبر (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 3 February 2011 15:24 (fourteen years ago)

xpost If it's a mutually agreed upon arrangement, then to each his own, I say.

I don't see anything wrong with what you've described.

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 15:26 (fourteen years ago)

Obviously this is a gross generalization for which I'll probably get shit but I think one of the reasons that it works better for gay male couples is that men are, on the whole, more likely than women to be able to just fuck someone without emotions getting involved.

ENBB, Thursday, 3 February 2011 15:33 (fourteen years ago)

And probably also something to do with the way sex and hookups are viewed within gay culture (again generalization) that I'm not quite sure how to articulate but will think on it and see if I can explain what I mean better.

ENBB, Thursday, 3 February 2011 15:39 (fourteen years ago)

i think what you're trying to say is that boys will be boys

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 15:42 (fourteen years ago)

lol <3

ENBB, Thursday, 3 February 2011 15:43 (fourteen years ago)

that is a generalization, but not a gross one. monogamy works for me as a gay man in part because sexual & emotional intimacy are so very tightly associated for me; i really can't indulge in the former without risk of the latter.

i mean, i've had meaningless sexual encounters when i was single, for certain, but i couldn't ever sleep with someone i know without it getting complicated.

monogamy keeps things pretty straightforward for me in that respect.

xp to enbb

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 3 February 2011 15:45 (fourteen years ago)

i could absolutely have a meaningless sexual encounter without it getting complicated; that's never been a problem
but i also do like the comfort of serial monogamy so it's a balance

الله basedأكبر (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 3 February 2011 15:47 (fourteen years ago)

i mean, there's probably something to the whole like wired for babies thing

― i like lucy (surm), Thursday, February 3, 2011 1:10 AM (9 hours ago) Bookmark

Hey Surm - what did you mean by this? Just curious cause now I'm thinking hard about this and think this might be otm to another one of the reasons open relationships are less likely to work for straight couples than gay.

ENBB, Thursday, 3 February 2011 15:52 (fourteen years ago)

i mean, i think women are more likely to seriously think about what would happen if they got involved with someone else.

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 15:55 (fourteen years ago)

the maternal instinct may come into play. a lot of animals choose their sex partners based on reproductive factors, it's like a biological thing.

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 15:58 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.glamour.com/sex-love-life/blogs/smitten/0708-sex-at-dawn-cover_sm.jpg
this book to thread

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:00 (fourteen years ago)

x-posts Right. I think also there's a biological aspect to certain things like jealousy among straight couples that arise from a sort of innate drive to procreate. See also societal attitudes about male v. female sexuality that filter into how couples deal with one another and also play into this at least on some level.

I get so wary of getting into conversations like this because I realize that these are touchy subjects and if I'm not absolutely certain of what I want to say then I get nervous because I'm afraid it'll come out wrong and ppl will jump all over it.

Sorry this is so off topic now.

ENBB, Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:01 (fourteen years ago)

that Sex at Dawn book is a really good read

gallagher 3 (latebloomer), Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:08 (fourteen years ago)

no i feel u E, i try not to be so self conscious about posting something bcuz otherwise i would never post, but i think we're all good

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:08 (fourteen years ago)

maybe i'm hopelessly antiquated but i happen to think that reserving your physical affection for one person is pretty huge as a symbolic display of dedication; i know that advancing some sex-as-spiritual-currency concept here might earn some eye-rolling & scorn but whatever, i like my sex to be meaningful!

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:13 (fourteen years ago)

I don't think that's antiquated at all Elmo. I'm the same and that's why I said upthread that I could never be in a poly/open sitch.

ENBB, Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:16 (fourteen years ago)

i think that's more than understandable, and a lot of people feel that way. what i have reacted to defensively in the past, tho, is the suggestion that a sexually open relationship is devoid of dedication that is just as meaningful. that i disagree with.

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:24 (fourteen years ago)

i am certainly not saying that this is what you are suggesting, just getting it out there.

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:24 (fourteen years ago)

but yes! i think that's so cool. and meaningful. and sweet.

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:30 (fourteen years ago)

i think that's more than understandable, and a lot of people feel that way. what i have reacted to defensively in the past, tho, is the suggestion that a sexually open relationship is devoid of dedication that is just as meaningful. that i disagree with.

― i like lucy (surm), Thursday, February 3, 2011 8:24 AM (7 minutes ago)

I really don't think that's what's being suggested dude, it's when one partner "opens" the relationship against the other's wishes/agreement/understanding is where it gets fucked up. See your example above.

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:33 (fourteen years ago)

yeah i dunno, sometimes i feel that there's an expectation for gay men to be more permissive & open than straight ppl, per e's generalization -- sorry if i come off as defensive about it but i've definitely felt monogamy to be openly disparaged in some queer quarters for being politically regressive or whatever

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:34 (fourteen years ago)

Thread title: "being the other man/woman"
Not: "open vs. monogamous relationships"

etc.

i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:35 (fourteen years ago)

I really don't think that's what's being suggested dude, it's when one partner "opens" the relationship against the other's wishes/agreement/understanding is where it gets fucked up. See your example above.

― i love you but i have chosen snarkness (Steve Shasta), Thursday, February 3, 2011 4:33 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

as i said, i know that is not what was being suggested. i was just having a conversation.

and as conversations tend to do, this one has gone from cheating to open relationships, and there's nothing wrong with that. it's just an ilx thread, no a thesis paper.

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:38 (fourteen years ago)

but thanks for the pedantry anyway ;)

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:39 (fourteen years ago)

Yeah, I was going to say. This isn't the first time a thread has veered off topic and it's not the last time and Surm's statement was perfectly fine in the context of the conversation at that point.

ENBB, Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:43 (fourteen years ago)

and not related to the issue about which he revived this thread but that' OK

ENBB, Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:44 (fourteen years ago)

eh well if we want to bring it back to the topic we could revisit the discussion we had on the gay thread about how some gays seem to think there are no ethical issues when hooking up w/ married men because the wife is "his problem, not mine"

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:49 (fourteen years ago)

i still think that's fucked up and i've been thinking about it a lot since that came up on the gay thread

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:51 (fourteen years ago)

this issue is also further complicated by the fact that it is like a fetish, and sort of rationalized along those lines

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 16:58 (fourteen years ago)

I've been wondering about it from a, I dunno, anthropological point of view.

Maybe it's something to do with some gays maybe deliberately wanting/needing to define their relationships differently from traditional hetero relationships? And closeting has to feed into that somewhere, I think. Being part of a group that has had to hide its sexuality, and in a lot of cases still does, that 'coming out', or finding a gay community aspect has to create a mindset of freedom that's more heightened for some people. Don't quite know how to express it so if that makes no sense blame my lack of morning coffee :)

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 17:32 (fourteen years ago)

I meant to write that as "traditional hetero relationships" so as not to imply any judgement. but I probably blew it.

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 17:34 (fourteen years ago)

I'd been approached a few years back by a much younger girl who was into me...it was very awkward and she was very very persistent and the temptation was killing me. I hadnt been with nor flirted with another woman in 13 years at the time. No matter how clouded my judgement was I never went through with any of it. There was no way I could have done that to my wife or myself...especially after seeing first hand what cheating did to my parents.

So I went home and beat off.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 17:52 (fourteen years ago)

You're a good man, charlie brown..

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 17:53 (fourteen years ago)

Last Temptation of Chris

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 17:55 (fourteen years ago)

she asked me to "f her on the bathroom sink".

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 17:56 (fourteen years ago)

That's a little forward.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 3 February 2011 17:57 (fourteen years ago)

wow

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 17:58 (fourteen years ago)

she was beyond forward. it was extremely awkward...if i was 21 at the time i would have bent her over right there.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 17:58 (fourteen years ago)

lol i love u

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 17:59 (fourteen years ago)

i feel that since i've been married women seem to flirt with me a whole hell of a lot...is it the wedding ring thing? Do women really have a thing for married guys.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 17:59 (fourteen years ago)

is it this challenge to get someone who is unattainable?

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:00 (fourteen years ago)

i dont get it.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:00 (fourteen years ago)

Yeah, I've definitely been approached by women more since I've been married than I ever was before. Maybe its because I just don't care and that reads differently? I don't know, but it is interesting.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:01 (fourteen years ago)

yeah maybe because im not out looking to meet girls...who knows.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:04 (fourteen years ago)

Just hypothesizing because married men have never had much appeal for me, but I guess
a) the unattainable,
b) once you attain it, you're more powerful than he is because he can't tell or let it get out there and you have a lot less to lose, and
c) you can hit it without speculating over long-term, it's a very fleeting and of-the-moment thing and you don't have to set your sights on a rel'ship afterward.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:23 (fourteen years ago)

Also it's possible she just really liked you?

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:24 (fourteen years ago)

maybe she did really like me or just wanted to get laid. anyhoo she wasn't my type...and even if she was...forget it.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:26 (fourteen years ago)

I don't think flirting necessarily means someone is interested...a lot of times it is just for fun.

Peyton Flanders (Nicole), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:26 (fourteen years ago)

this was over aggressive flirting this was basically walking pornography.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:27 (fourteen years ago)

Thinking even more about b) above, married men might be the rare occasion when a woman can hit it just for the hell of it, and end up MORE powerful than the dude afterward, instead of somehow at a disadvantage for having "given it up." Hmm. Dunno.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:28 (fourteen years ago)

Okay, when I wrote that I didn't see "f her on the bathroom sink". In that case, ¯\(°_°)/¯

Peyton Flanders (Nicole), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:28 (fourteen years ago)

also it was weird because i had been overweight for 8 years and was suddenly slim and was never hit on in years except for a gay man once...which was flattering.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:29 (fourteen years ago)

do married women get hit on in this fashion?

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:30 (fourteen years ago)

I don't think flirting necessarily means someone is interested...a lot of times it is just for fun.

Oh, I'm sure. Flirting is fun. I just have been flirted with a lot more by random women since I got married than I ever was before.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:31 (fourteen years ago)

Yes this Jon ^, except its more since i've lost weight and been married.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:32 (fourteen years ago)

ive also been flirted with by other married women....its a weird world this.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:32 (fourteen years ago)

Married men are kinda "safe" to be nice to, I think might have something to do with it. Not in chris' case, obv. But in the case of daily niceness that is often interpreted as being flirtatious, when a guy is already hitched it's kinda relaxing not to be on guard and trying to send only the "right" or safe messages all the time.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:33 (fourteen years ago)

Well, yeah, but that kind of reads like you don't think men can tell the difference between everyday niceness and flirting.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:37 (fourteen years ago)

I think that that is true for at least a double-digit percentage of the male populace.

Catsupppppp Grind (kkvgz), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:40 (fourteen years ago)

otm

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:40 (fourteen years ago)

Ugh, another men are morons thread.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:41 (fourteen years ago)

thats what i was going to say, a lot of my married friends would take everyday niceness as flirting and would be all "dude, this chick is DTF"

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:43 (fourteen years ago)

then i'd have to bring them down 25 notches.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:43 (fourteen years ago)

I mean, yes, there are men who have trouble distinguishing the two, but it feels like we were too close to slipping into broad generalizations.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:44 (fourteen years ago)

Hey, I used to have a married friend who I was nice to and I thought it was obv safe because his wife even WORKED WITH US, BOTH, and I didn't worry about it. His wife ended up making a public statement about how she didn't trust me OR him, and he tried to take me out to lunch and tell me a a "secret." I have never back-pedaled so hard in my life.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:44 (fourteen years ago)

Sounds like that was more the wife's issue than his, at least from your condensed version. I'm sure it was much more difficult and involved than that. Sucks though, definitely.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:46 (fourteen years ago)

the secret was that he had a horse cock.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:47 (fourteen years ago)

Look, whatever, I'm just sayin' it would be nice to be able to relax around guys and think that they will reliably get the msg that other stuff is off the table and also off the bathroom counter now that you mention it. Married guys can seem to offer that opportunity.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:48 (fourteen years ago)

lol that was an xp but it works for you too, Mr Mom.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:48 (fourteen years ago)

Also I was a total innocent then, and actually trusted that their marriage was an unbreakable bond and OF COURSE nothing else could be happening because that would Be Wrong. Wouldn't be that dumm now. I don't think.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:49 (fourteen years ago)

in my case i've been flirted with more since i've been married but i think it's because i don't give a shit anymore. fwiw to me monogamy isn't even a question for me. i look at my wife and i see my best friend and a particularly kind and decent soul, and even if i could get away w/something i wouldn't do it because my guilt would be too deep, and that doesn't even get into the lesser factors of STDs and how it would affect the third party in the long run, and i should also mention that i'd never cheat on anyone no matter how bad the relationship was. i'd simply end it with them first.

omar little, Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:49 (fourteen years ago)

Laurel, I'm not disagreeing with you, I just wish we didn't have to paint all men with a broad brush.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:50 (fourteen years ago)

i also find it strange the types that flirt with me...i get a lot of prepsters and nice looking business like ladies and i am the complete opposite...im a heavily tattooed, t shirt and jeans dude who wears docs.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:52 (fourteen years ago)

Yeah, I'd like to clarify that I've also never cheated on a romantic partner and I don't even think about cheating on my wife. My brain pretty much automatically blurs the potentially attractive features on other women.

But when I was still single, I wouldn't give a damn if a potential one-night stand was in some kind of boyfriend/girlfriend dating relationship. Other than if I thought they might be strapped.

Catsupppppp Grind (kkvgz), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:54 (fourteen years ago)

^^^ basically this

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 18:57 (fourteen years ago)

preppy ladies LOVE a tattooed man, chris

kind of how like juggalos like me because they think i might be a SEXXXXYY LIBRARIAN TYPE LOLOL

homosexual II, Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:05 (fourteen years ago)

i cheated on ex girlfriends without hesitation when i was younger and in school. once i got with my wife, who i met in college i never even thought about doing that to her.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:06 (fourteen years ago)

so its true that opposites attract.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:07 (fourteen years ago)

Never cheated in my life, except for the ex-gf who was looking for an excuse to dump me and claimed that a drunk girl trying to kiss me before I pushed her away was "cheating".

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:07 (fourteen years ago)

lol Mandee, I used to have a friend who was really into comic books and cat-eye glasses and super cheesy "pin-up punk" styles and she was eternally sad that really punk guys weren't into her but comic books nerds who were too shy to talk to girls thought she was the bee's knees. The charitable reading of that is that everyone is somebody's fantasy, I guess.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:12 (fourteen years ago)

i cheated on all my girlfriends up to me getting to age 23 or so. not proud of it. Cut it the fuck out when i realized it was not a good idea.
had to google "DTF" by the way so thanks for that.

الله basedأكبر (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:13 (fourteen years ago)

of course for all i know most of my girlfriends probably cheated on me too.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:16 (fourteen years ago)

are you cute?

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:21 (fourteen years ago)

i've been called handsome...hahaha....

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:22 (fourteen years ago)

do married women get hit on in this fashion?
not at all
quite the opposite ime

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:32 (fourteen years ago)

not that it's anything to lament, of course -- it's kind of liberating in a weird way because the intense so not gonna happen vibe
it's kinda like having all that tension erased and ppl can just be normal

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:34 (fourteen years ago)

Somewhere around age 25, I taught my brain to convert wedding rings into:

http://www.virginmedia.com/images/coralsnake-430.jpg

Catsupppppp Grind (kkvgz), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:37 (fourteen years ago)

yeah I don't really get girls flirting with married men, then again I never really got flirting for sport.

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:39 (fourteen years ago)

Being in a rel'ship (altho I've never been married) def made me feel freer not to shut guys down if they struck up convo in public. I'd be free to respond in a friendly way and as long as I know that my own behavior has been nothing but reasonable/polite, I don't have to worry about what they're doing to think or do. At some point it will come up, very reasonably, that I have a boyfriend, and it will all be a non-issue. Contemplating single-dom again, this will probably change.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:48 (fourteen years ago)

single-dom seeking single-sub

الله basedأكبر (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:53 (fourteen years ago)

i cant imagine being single now, i wouldn't even begin to know how to approach women anymore or how to date. its all so confusing to me now.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:55 (fourteen years ago)

Its always uncomfortable when someone is intent on forcing their non-singleness into a conversation. I was at a work function with some of our consultants and talking about compeltely work-related projects with this woman who was going through complicated verbal contortions to make sure I knew she was engaged. "Oh yeah, I'm anxious to see how that project turns out, because the contractor is a joke. I mean, I'll have to drive my fiancee by the site sometime just to see it". Like, kinda forgivable if she had recently became engaged but she pointed out several times that they had been engaged for 8 months. I don't know, it was just weird and uncomfortable. Unless I really give off stong "I'mma tryin' to flirt with ya vibes when I make friendly talk".

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:55 (fourteen years ago)

Endquote in way wrong place there.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:55 (fourteen years ago)

i also bet if i was single no one would flirt with me.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:56 (fourteen years ago)

i say all this as i sit at my desk with my finger knuckle deep in my nostril....WHAT UP LADIES.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Thursday, 3 February 2011 19:56 (fourteen years ago)

I mean, one other person in this thread has actually met me irl and I hope I didn't give off crepey vibes. o_O

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:00 (fourteen years ago)

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:01 (fourteen years ago)

I was pretty much joking (or so I hope!).

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:03 (fourteen years ago)

Haha, I realize that could be taken way out of context given the topic of this thread. The meeting was totally innocent.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:04 (fourteen years ago)

haha! that's me! nope, not that i recall. you gave me $$, i gave you gbv tickets. i think you drank some coffee. harmless.

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:07 (fourteen years ago)

i cant imagine being single now, i wouldn't even begin to know how to approach women anymore or how to date.

Now, try being in that position having been in relationships for 9 years without a break and then yr partner just up and buggering off so you have to start all over again. At 39.

*fun*.

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:09 (fourteen years ago)

Mind you I am kind of enjoying it now, but it has taken almost a year to adjust.

Cyclone Yazoo (Trayce), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:10 (fourteen years ago)

xxp

Man, Woman Interact; Successfully Avoid Creepage.

Catsupppppp Grind (kkvgz), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:10 (fourteen years ago)

Haha, Onion headline I would like to see.

I would be scared to death to be single right now, but otoh, I think being out in the working world and networking has made me much much more comfortable talking to "strangers" than I was at any point in my life.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:11 (fourteen years ago)

Also, this is very tangetially related to this thread, but I saw a poster for the movie Hall Pass on my way back from lunch. I'd never even heard of this as a "thing" before, is this just Hollywood men trying to create something? Or have you heard of that use of "hall pass" before?

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:12 (fourteen years ago)

wrt the thread topic, i think there is a huge difference between a one-time, isolated infidelity and carrying on & on with someone in who's already in a committed relationship -- which is what the phrase "other woman" connotes, in my mind

i definitely had a poly situation for a while with a guy; he & his wife were both bi & poly and i was kinda his boyfriend (but not really). it was all cool & relatively little drama but in retrospect i was pretty miserable. on one hand, i nursed a resentment for being the spice in his life and really wished i could have his affection for myself; otoh i think i had a pretty poor estimation of myself at the time and didn't really think i was worthy of that sort of love & commitment. but i stayed in this arrangement for a couple years, even though i was unhappy. after i got together with my current boyfriend, i explained to my poly friend that things had changed for me and that i was monogamous; when i introduced him to my boyfriend, he tried to kiss me & i had to cut him out of my life because i felt i had to.

anyway -- just my experience being "the other woman."

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:39 (fourteen years ago)

i cant imagine being single now, i wouldn't even begin to know how to approach women anymore or how to date. its all so confusing to me now.

I have thought about this a bit, and if I end up single again I am just not going to bother. I don't have the time, energy or patience to put any effort into dating at this point in my life.

Peyton Flanders (Nicole), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:42 (fourteen years ago)

btw "Another Woman's Husband" is one of my top 2 favorite Lifetime movies ever

Lisa Rinna is REALLY good in it

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:42 (fourteen years ago)

Lisa Rinna is a television movie goddess. Her and Tori Spelling.

Peyton Flanders (Nicole), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:43 (fourteen years ago)

omg yes

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:44 (fourteen years ago)

i had no idea rinna was so good!

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:44 (fourteen years ago)

She was also v. good on Melrose Place.

Peyton Flanders (Nicole), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:46 (fourteen years ago)

btw we are starting melrose place on netflix

i cannot

wait

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:46 (fourteen years ago)

I've been trying to talk my wife into MP for a loooong time, but she just won't do it. Too OTT for her. She'll watch The O.C. and the new 90210 (which is so awful now) all day long, but she won't get down with the ridiculous awesomeness that is Melrose Place. I miss the days of that and the ill-fated Models Inc.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:51 (fourteen years ago)

You are in for a treat. xp

Peyton Flanders (Nicole), Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:52 (fourteen years ago)

I've been trying to talk my wife into MP for a loooong time, but she just won't do it. Too OTT for her.

at first i thought MP was some poly-sex acronym i'd never heard of

mookieproof, Thursday, 3 February 2011 21:53 (fourteen years ago)

lol lol

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 21:56 (fourteen years ago)

It involves throwing your partner into the communal pool.

Peyton Flanders (Nicole), Thursday, 3 February 2011 21:58 (fourteen years ago)

don't forget running over an ex-lover in your car

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 22:02 (fourteen years ago)

also wearing bad wigs

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 22:02 (fourteen years ago)

lisa rinna can come get it, if harry doesn't like it he can deal

goole, Thursday, 3 February 2011 22:03 (fourteen years ago)

lisa rinna got her lips deflated after a while

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 22:08 (fourteen years ago)

God I should hope so. Jesus:

http://static.thehollywoodgossip.com/images/gallery/lisa-rinna-lips.jpg

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 22:22 (fourteen years ago)

i know. she like talked about it on a show once. she was like "i know about my lips"

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 22:23 (fourteen years ago)

at that size I'm surprised she didn't have a speech impediment.

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 22:39 (fourteen years ago)

Contrary to what may be commonly thought among men, I feel like those would pretty much be the opposite of good for, well, you know what.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 22:42 (fourteen years ago)

yeah when they're like that they're about sexy as a pair of wax lips.

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 22:45 (fourteen years ago)

Exactly.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 22:50 (fourteen years ago)

it's like boob implants. at some point you have to know that they are less attractive than the most unattractive natural boobs, right?

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:04 (fourteen years ago)

I dunno I find pretty much all boob implants unattractive due to the weird scarring/stretch marks. plus they don't move. which is weird.

bien-pensant vibe (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:06 (fourteen years ago)

I think that breast implants can be done well but most just aren't.

ENBB, Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:08 (fourteen years ago)

When I was on spring break in Texas during lolcollege we met this girl who got implants and was paying for them by entering every wet t-shirt contest she could find. She was extremely proud of them, probably because they were pretty damn real looking.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:09 (fourteen years ago)

paying for them by entering every wet t-shirt contest she could find

there's some weird moebius-strip logic to this

bien-pensant vibe (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:12 (fourteen years ago)

i hate fake boobs on a girl. they feel like a hard plastic kid's toy, not erotic at all. feel sad that societal pressure makes girls feel compelled to get them, I like girls with smaller boobs just fine! i mean if you wanna get em that's fine but I mean they don't even look good, they just sit there not moving.

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:12 (fourteen years ago)

that being said, I've never dated a small breasted girl, but that's cuz I'm attracted to women with a few extra pounds in general.

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:12 (fourteen years ago)

I've def seen some pretty real looking fakes whereas I'm not sure lip injections ever look good but, of course, that could be because you only notice the really obviously bad ones.

ENBB, Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:13 (fourteen years ago)

there's some weird moebius-strip logic to this

Oh yeah, definitely.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:15 (fourteen years ago)

i wonder how accurate fake cocks/balls generally are

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:18 (fourteen years ago)

I've been trying to talk my wife into MP for a loooong time, but she just won't do it. Too OTT for her.

at first i thought MP was some poly-sex acronym i'd never heard of

yeah I saw it at the bottom of the thread before expanding to read all, and thought he meant Multiple Partners

basically just a 2/47 freak out (sic), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:19 (fourteen years ago)

Worked with a gorgeous Korean woman who had implants. The sad thing was she was desperate to get her face done and I could not for the life of me understand why. Like she wanted her lips done and her eyes widened and all this stuff, and she had the MOST beautiful bone structure, she just did not understand what a knockout she was.

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:21 (fourteen years ago)

question for the hetero males in here -- would you ever let your girlfriend do sexual things with another girl?

it's an interesting question to me as there seems to be almost an even split among people I know, half who would be jealous, half who would find it erotic and would allow it.

I was asked by my g/f in 09 if she could do things with another girl with me in the room. I said "yes" as well, frankly, such a thing felt like Christmas to me, but I realize other people could feel very jealous about that.

(It didn't wind up happening). also have to say i might not have been ok with it without me in the room.

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:22 (fourteen years ago)

Interesting question. It is slightly more complicated because my wife is bi, so there would definitely be a greater chance of that happening for relatively valid reasons. She has mentioned before that she has never wanted to do a threesome or anything, she finds the dynamics too messy and complicated to really enjoy it (I agree with her on that, but don't have any ancedotal evidence to back it up). I don't think it likely that she would ever suggest it though, even if she sometimes sees an attractive girl and goes "I miss women". I would most likely say yes, depending on the ground rules - who is she, what's the relationship, etc etc.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:25 (fourteen years ago)

I sound a lot like your wife in that I'm bi but have never been with a woman in front of a partner for exactly the reasons she cited. Also for the same reasons that I could never be in an open relationship.

ENBB, Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:30 (fourteen years ago)

Yeah, I completely understand why she wouldn't want to do it and I'd never expect her to want to do that. But I'd lie if I said the thought wasn't a bit of a turn-on.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:32 (fourteen years ago)

My boyfriend in college asked me to do it all the time and tbph it was pretty annoying.

ENBB, Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:33 (fourteen years ago)

lol, that's the thing. It always felt hypocritical to me that I wouldn't allow my girlfriend to have casual sex with another guy "because it's just sex", but that I'd be fine with her doing sexual things with another girl with me in the room.

but girl on girl is well...need I say more, for me it's a huge turn-on. but I've always struggled with the cognitive dissonance I feel in oking.

oh well, she's the only g/f I ever had that ever asked me though anyway.

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:34 (fourteen years ago)

oh yea that's stupid, pressuring your partner into doing that is just ridiculous.

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:34 (fourteen years ago)

Yeah well he was sort of an asshole all around so.

ENBB, Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:35 (fourteen years ago)

Well, you know, you reach a point where you realize certain fantasies just aren't going to be fulfilled. lol

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:36 (fourteen years ago)

i just can't deal with that realization

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:38 (fourteen years ago)

it was funny though, one of my gay friends apparently made out with my g/f at a party, which I didn't find out until later, and she ok'ed it without mentioning it to me because she thought I'd be cool with it since he was gay and it was obviously recreational.

I don't blame him for it, he's a cool guy, and we're still close friends, but thought it completely retarded that she didn't even bother to ask me first. we were already broken up by the time I found out though.

I don't know what I would have said if I was asked, but it's just the point that she assumed that pissed me off.

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:39 (fourteen years ago)

i just can't deal with that realization

Yeah, I mean, I still have the fantasies but I'm growing ever and ever closer to knowing they just won't happen.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:40 (fourteen years ago)

i just can't deal with that realization

time will force you to deal with it

bien-pensant vibe (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:41 (fourteen years ago)

yea when I finally forced myself to accept that I couldn't fuck Holly Would from Cool World, things finally got better for me

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:42 (fourteen years ago)

yeah i know i'm not looking forward to it fuck

that's interesting about the gay friend

we gay men tend to feel like we can take our liberties with women when sometimes it's just not true i guess

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:42 (fourteen years ago)

well I mean it wasn't really like that, per se. he's an upstanding guy, very professional and well respected, and I love him to death. he did ask her if it was going to be a problem, just wish he'd found me. I'm guessing she was like "ehh who cares he's fine, he knows you don't mean anything by it" (I can't remember what she said she said).

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:43 (fourteen years ago)

i might have allowed it anyway. they're both actors, it mighta been nothing more than a stage kiss essentially

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:44 (fourteen years ago)

but then again I'm a complete idiot

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:44 (fourteen years ago)

alright sorry to hijack, continue!

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:45 (fourteen years ago)

actors and emotions, a complete mystery, if you ask me

what do they mean

what do they feel?

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:45 (fourteen years ago)

to be honest, actors/actresses are some of the craziest people alive. you kinda have to be to be good at it.

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:46 (fourteen years ago)

also mass infidelity goes on

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:47 (fourteen years ago)

one of my half-actor friends was just saying that he doesn't think famous famous actors are capable of sustaining romantic relationships

i like lucy (surm), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:48 (fourteen years ago)

I work with a gay guy, he's been in a relationship with another guy for about 10 years but he is kind of flirty and flighty, and he ALWAYS tries to make out with girls when he's drunk. He's made out with my friend a bunch of times. The one time he tried it with me I just shoved him away and he acted all surprised like I should have been flattered. He and his female friends all make out at parties like it's just sharing dessert and that's fine, but it's like, you can't just assume you can do that with everyone.

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:51 (fourteen years ago)

if I was single I guess I would have, but not anymore.

VegemiteGrrrl, Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:52 (fourteen years ago)

I would "share dessert" with all of these ilxors

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 3 February 2011 23:59 (fourteen years ago)

So I just thought of something that would bring this back to the original q

The college bf I mentioned upthread would ask me to do this a lot but often with a specific best friend of mine in mind. Years later (we were together for 4 in total) I asked him one night straight up if he'd ever cheated me. I kind of knew but just needed to know for sure. He said yes and that it had been with her. At first I didn't even believe him but a few phone calls to her confirmed it and it turned out that they'd messed around on a handful of occasions.

I was destroyed. The thing was that I had a train ticket to go visit her the very next morning and I got on that train. I cried off and on for the nearly seven hour trip and told her when I arrived that we were going to hash this out and then put it behind us which is exactly what we did.

There were no emotions involved just some drunken fooling around. I made it very very clear to them how hurt but I was able to forgive them. They both meant way too much to me to let some drunken idiocy destroy. I dated him for another year+ am still friends with him today and I was eventually the maid of honor in her wedding.

A couple years ago her brother died and she called me a mess from a combo of grief and heavy sedatives. She just kept repeating over and over how bad she still felt because of that and how screwing me over was her biggest regret. While I think that sometimes I am forgiving to a fault I've never regretted forgiving them because I knew that it meant basically nothing and that they were both truly sorry.

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 00:02 (fourteen years ago)

wait I just realized that was a really long story and that it really doesn't hark back to the question at hand except for the part where she's always felt awful about being the "other woman" - sorry about that

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 00:03 (fourteen years ago)

No it was a good story, sounds pretty rough but also sounds like it worked out a lot better than it might have otherwise.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 4 February 2011 00:08 (fourteen years ago)

Also, your ex-bf = idiot

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 4 February 2011 00:09 (fourteen years ago)

gosh that was a good story

i like lucy (surm), Friday, 4 February 2011 00:10 (fourteen years ago)

x-post Yeah, he was a total idiot. That isn't even the tip of the iceberg of enormously dipshitty stunts he's pulled over the years but those are other stories for other threads. Maybe. lol.

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 00:15 (fourteen years ago)

Poll thread?

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 4 February 2011 00:16 (fourteen years ago)

haha you're like our grandma

you're like "another time, another time"

i like lucy (surm), Friday, 4 February 2011 00:17 (fourteen years ago)

ENBB is way younger and cueter than most grandmas, iirc

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 4 February 2011 00:18 (fourteen years ago)

tote

i like lucy (surm), Friday, 4 February 2011 00:18 (fourteen years ago)

like way

i like lucy (surm), Friday, 4 February 2011 00:18 (fourteen years ago)

hahahaha <3

Listen, I used to want to be a writer. It's in my blood, this storytelling thing.

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 00:19 (fourteen years ago)

ENBB: cutest storyteller ever :)

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 4 February 2011 00:20 (fourteen years ago)

aw :)

(hey VG I don't know if you got it but I webmailed you a couple days ago)

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 00:22 (fourteen years ago)

You did? :D!! I don't think I got it :(
did you send it to s✧@r✧✧.✧3nny at g✧@i✧.✧*m?

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 4 February 2011 00:27 (fourteen years ago)

This thread just got more interesting.

Jokes, jokes.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 4 February 2011 00:28 (fourteen years ago)

No I did it through ILX so it would have gone to whatever email you registered with.

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 00:28 (fourteen years ago)

Wait! i found it ENBB :)

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 4 February 2011 00:32 (fourteen years ago)

:)

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 00:32 (fourteen years ago)

<3 <3

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 4 February 2011 00:33 (fourteen years ago)

I should take this to another thread but quick question: if I've changed email addresses do I have to re-register?

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 4 February 2011 00:34 (fourteen years ago)

yeah unfortch

basically just a 2/47 freak out (sic), Friday, 4 February 2011 01:05 (fourteen years ago)

i had a one night stand with a coworker like four years ago and i'd had no idea he was married until about a month later

when he parades his baby around the office i give him the stink eye

homosexual II, Friday, 4 February 2011 01:54 (fourteen years ago)

that's really very awful

i like lucy (surm), Friday, 4 February 2011 04:42 (fourteen years ago)

i cannot imagine

i like lucy (surm), Friday, 4 February 2011 04:42 (fourteen years ago)

i had a very close "friend" when i was younger who was bi, one night in a drunken flirty mess she asked me if I wanted to watch her and her female friend...of course i said yes, about 30 seconds into it once they were nude i freaked out and ran out of the room. DAMN IT.

But to answer the question above, I don't think I could watch my wife do that. I'd get jealous as I have trust issues anyways.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Friday, 4 February 2011 16:25 (fourteen years ago)

My weirdest story in this genre:

I flirted with a woman in a class, but it turned out she had a boyfriend, so I stepped away. A few months later I met her again and she talked about her boyfriend as though they were a thing of the past, so started hanging out with her. We drove to Mexico one night, got drunk, then came back to her place and fell asleep. In the middle of the night her boyfriend showed up and tried to kick me out of bed. I was too drunk and sleepy to leave, so I stayed and he laid down in bed with the two of us. In the morning the woman woke up to find herself between the two of us and was pretty freaked out.

President Keyes, Friday, 4 February 2011 16:35 (fourteen years ago)

awesome.

Cultivating a manly musk puts your opponents on notice (chrisv2010), Friday, 4 February 2011 16:36 (fourteen years ago)

i had a very close "friend" when i was younger who was bi, one night in a drunken flirty mess she asked me if I wanted to watch her and her female friend...of course i said yes, about 30 seconds into it once they were nude i freaked out and ran out of the room. DAMN IT.

that happened in a joe matt comic book

dell (del), Friday, 4 February 2011 17:25 (fourteen years ago)

eight years pass...

Talk me out of it. But I’m out my marriage and I want some uncomplicated fun. It’ll never lead to anything serious. The easy part: he lives several hours away. My best friend said to stop pursuing it but I rrrrreally like him. More like a friend with benefit? We’ll see.

nathom, Friday, 3 January 2020 00:00 (five years ago)

unlikely to be uncomplicated if he doesn't have an arrangement? even if he does complications may arise

bidenfan69420 (jim in vancouver), Friday, 3 January 2020 00:12 (five years ago)

my mil's boyfriend of like 20 years has been married and living with his spouse the entire time. It seems to work fine.

Yerac, Friday, 3 January 2020 00:22 (five years ago)

My friend: her mother had three kids w her (also married) lover. None with the husband. So weird.

Anyway we’ll see.

nathom, Friday, 3 January 2020 00:39 (five years ago)

I did this inside of an arrangement and it was not uncomplicated.

He was an asshole who pressured her into an open marriage after she shut the door on threesomes, she was kind of my boss (I was barbacking a couple of nights a week for under the table cash, she owned the bar) and immediately pursued me. He didn't find anyone who'd fuck him for months (or maybe a year) and got increasingly assholish about it, she moved out of their house, started drinking heavily and started to get mad at me for not stepping up our relationship quicker. I noped the fuck out, I signed on for sidepiece sex, not dating someone 12 years older with three kids who wasn't even divorced.

Last I heard they were back together.

Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Friday, 3 January 2020 00:53 (five years ago)

barbacking a couple of nights a week

you best believe i read this three times

Banáná hÉireann (darraghmac), Friday, 3 January 2020 00:56 (five years ago)

anyway, if everyone knows, then sure nath

if someone doesnt, eh its shitty imo but lifes complicated right

Banáná hÉireann (darraghmac), Friday, 3 January 2020 00:57 (five years ago)

xp I was young but thankfully not that dumb.

Greta Van Show Feets BB (milo z), Friday, 3 January 2020 00:59 (five years ago)

Xpost setting rules. just so i know what i’m getting myself into. fuck it, i need some fun. after these horrible two years, i need a break. don’t need a relationship, just some fun. we’ll see how it goes.

nathom, Friday, 3 January 2020 23:12 (five years ago)

yeah, what's more fun than traveling several hours

j., Saturday, 4 January 2020 01:33 (five years ago)

If it’s on a train, then nothing.

Swilling Ambergris, Esq. (silby), Saturday, 4 January 2020 01:37 (five years ago)

Love train journeys tbh.

Frozen Mug (Tom D.), Saturday, 4 January 2020 01:38 (five years ago)

nath is there any chance you could bang on the train

j., Saturday, 4 January 2020 01:57 (five years ago)

coupling

Banáná hÉireann (darraghmac), Saturday, 4 January 2020 01:58 (five years ago)

I recommend this until the exact moment that either party starts to feel any level of emotional attachment toward the other. Once that happens, sever contact immediately.

kelis navidad (flamboyant goon tie included), Saturday, 4 January 2020 02:50 (five years ago)

nath is there any chance you could bang on the train


I vaguely remember doing that already. Lol.

Yeah, once I fall for him, then it’s/shld be over.

Honestly more a post divorce romp for me tbh.

nathom, Saturday, 4 January 2020 03:06 (five years ago)

shouldn't this be on 77 though

StanM, Saturday, 4 January 2020 03:27 (five years ago)

since apparently no one's gonna straight-out say it: we all want you to get laid -- but maybe first make sure you're not fucking up someone's family

mookieproof, Saturday, 4 January 2020 03:34 (five years ago)

the other man/woman is the same category of person as bad tippers

the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Saturday, 4 January 2020 03:53 (five years ago)

In contrast, the married men I’ve slept with have been very generous with their tips

kelis navidad (flamboyant goon tie included), Saturday, 4 January 2020 04:16 (five years ago)

To insure promptness, indeed.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 4 January 2020 04:20 (five years ago)

thought i said it, tbh mookie

Banáná hÉireann (darraghmac), Saturday, 4 January 2020 06:29 (five years ago)

I was the other man once, maybe twice; I don't remember

Sassy Boutonnière (ledriver), Saturday, 4 January 2020 06:31 (five years ago)

xp a bit too circumspect imo

life is indeed complicated tho

mookieproof, Saturday, 4 January 2020 06:48 (five years ago)

Mookieproof for sure.

nathom, Saturday, 4 January 2020 07:40 (five years ago)

whoever you hook up with right out of a long term relationship -- it's gonna be a mix of exciting and awkwardness and you will probably end up feeling like garbage. Idk whether it's better for it to be in this more garbage-feeling-prone context of the person being married/in a relationship -- like just go balls deep for potential garbage feelings? ... Anyway, you can always make a thread about it, create a throwaway gmail account to create a sock account to start the thread ... ah memories!

sarahell, Saturday, 4 January 2020 22:28 (five years ago)

“Just go balls deep for potential garbage feelings” yup

calstars, Saturday, 4 January 2020 22:34 (five years ago)

having a sure sense of self and an emotional support system is key, so you don’t fill up with resentment toward the public facing relationship and its attendant gestures of affection/appreciation

but i mostly advise against this tbh

maura, Sunday, 5 January 2020 03:18 (five years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.