I know folks be talking on other threads about this, but ILE needed a thread, especially given all the dawg love that came out on the Dogs: C/D thread lately.
This fucking guy. 10 million a year in salary, plus prolly that again in endorsements, and he's fucking raising, tending, and exterminating pit bulls for fighting purposes.
[http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0717072vick1.html] The indictment [/url].
[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/17/AR2007071701893.html?tid%3Dinformbox&sub=AR] Mike Wilbon on Vick.[/url]
And a quote from Colin Cowherd, from this morning's show: "If you have four kids, and one turns out bad, that's normal - that's just going with the numbers. But when you have two kids - Michael and Marcus Vick - and both turn out to be total grease fires, you gotta take hard look in the mirror."
Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home.
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:05 (eighteen years ago)
ESPN's legal coverage, which does a pretty good job of breaking down the trial aspects.
According to the indictment, Vick was in the middle of everything from beginning to end. He purchased a vacant piece of property for $34,000, the indictment says. He then had sheds built for training dogs and staging fights and a fence erected to shield the operation from view. And finally, the indictment says, he had a two-story frame house with a basketball court put up as a residence for the people taking care of the dogs. If you believe the indictment, the Vick property had everything anyone could want in a dogfighting operation.
seriously, if he did it, fuck this guy.
― kingfish, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:33 (eighteen years ago)
the feds are not going to build a high profile case like this without the goods. Vick is going down, and hopefully Arthur Blank will be able to cut him loose from the Worst Contract Ever.
Fucking dog killer.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:39 (eighteen years ago)
Sometimes when you get a shitload of money it's a good idea to move past the crappy world you lived in before.
― humansuit, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:43 (eighteen years ago)
he was "keeping it real"
total scum bag
― carne asada, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:45 (eighteen years ago)
No, he wasn't. There are a TON of professional athletes, black men, and men raised in rural America who don't engage in the wholsale torture and slaughter of animals. This is not "keeping it real." This is keeping it crazy.
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:50 (eighteen years ago)
a note about Qyntel Woods, who's house was raided and who was suspended from the Trailblazers 3 years ago in a dogfighting investigation.
and the case of LeShon Johnson
― kingfish, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:54 (eighteen years ago)
xpost no, i agree this guy is wacked for being involved in this at all. to even tolerate or associate with the creeps that do this sort of thing is despicable
― carne asada, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:55 (eighteen years ago)
You know, it's possible to (rightly) bag on the dude w/out having to make leading horseshit comments about him "keeping it real" or "(moving) past the crappy world (he) lived in before". Tho if we're going to be quoting that walking sack of ignorant shit Colin Cowherd, then by all means, let's go there, because it'll be a step up from dealing w/ the spew that asshat spits out.
THANK YOU BLAM
― David R., Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)
(for the xpost, that is)
― David R., Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:57 (eighteen years ago)
A leading horseshit comment?
― humansuit, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:00 (eighteen years ago)
What a douche
― Michael White, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:00 (eighteen years ago)
David R or Vick?
― humansuit, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:04 (eighteen years ago)
I wonder how many of the smaller players made beeline yesterday to US Atty's office to trade testimony for immunity.
― Rock Hardy, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:08 (eighteen years ago)
this is interesting, from the AP newswire a month ago:
Nike Turns Down Request to Sack Vick 19 June 2007
Nike has no plans to dump Michael Vick from its roster of celebrity athletes, turning aside a request from the national Humane Society to cut ties with the Atlanta Falcons quarterback over alleged ties to dogfighting.
― kingfish, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:13 (eighteen years ago)
I bet they'll be dropping him now.
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:13 (eighteen years ago)
Honestly I think that Nike is doing the right thing see: Duke rape case. Like to see some actual evidence, nowatimean.
― humansuit, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:15 (eighteen years ago)
read the indictment.
― lauren, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:17 (eighteen years ago)
I think Nike is a company white people who read newspapers stopped buying products from about a decade ago, with the exception of golfers, who are their own class of shitbags and could care less about dogfighting. Oh, demography.
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:18 (eighteen years ago)
thank you, WSFA-TV in Montgomery, for running that particular graphic to accompany this story.
― kingfish, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:18 (eighteen years ago)
xxpost i don't think you can't really compare this to the Duke case.
― carne asada, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:19 (eighteen years ago)
No, you can't, for one thing, Michael Vick is a black quarterback, cf the Wilbon article on how big this actually is in terms of context and circumstances
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:20 (eighteen years ago)
xxxx - yeah but an indictment is a charge, not a trial.
xx - Yes, you can compare it to the Duke case because charges were brought (as in this case) and there has been no trial (as in this case). I'm sure that the evidence is much stronger, but it must run its course, mustn't it?
― humansuit, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)
Nike sells shitloads of product to white people who read newspapers. Check out their market share sometime when you get a chance.
Fuck Mike Wilbon, that water-carrier for #23 and general know-nothing asshelmet whose greatest legacy is that he isn't Stephen A. Smith.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)
LOL this is exactly like my moving violation indictment!
― jessie monster, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)
I agree about Cowherd. For the most part, I disagree with his politics or his desire to even inject politics into sport. BUT - I had to say that the grease fire comment made me laugh out loud for a few good minutes.
Reading that indictment this morning made me want to go and hug my dog. Jesus, that shit is disgusting to me.
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:24 (eighteen years ago)
I'm not white but I read newspapers, and I don't buy Nikes. What does that really say about me? I believe that means I'm acting white.
― humansuit, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:26 (eighteen years ago)
mike wilbon is one of the better shit shovelers in the business, regularly shows up kornheiser on PTI, and I'll not have you impugn his marginal reputation.
My point, don, is that people who are all "fuck michael vick" about this already don't buy nike shit for about 1000 other reasons.
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:26 (eighteen years ago)
Tho i should say that my own father, golfer/tiger woods fan/ex-golf-coach, would probably go after some of these dogfighting guys with his nike-brand clubs.
― kingfish, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)
I don't think so. Tomboto said he wouldn't.
― humansuit, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)
wow this has to be a record # of posts for a thread going from 0 to stupid.
― jessie monster, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)
ok ok I withdraw my hasty marketing generalizations based on a deep-seated dislike of country club members and my own anecdotal evidence of hardly seeing anybody of any race color or creed wearing nike sneakers anymore
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:32 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah - can we get back to "Fuck Michael Vick?" What a fucking monster.
― schwantz, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:32 (eighteen years ago)
Still a discouraging sign: the amount of ear-docking i saw at this local breeder show in Camas on saturday. A blue pit puppy with ear stitches is a horrible sight.
xp
not to say that country club members don't have their own problems. I'm kinda curious about what the sports coverage of this will be, in terms of focusing on the crime or how this fucks over the team. Hey PP, you're at a sports talk station, right? Have the callers been talking about this yet?
― kingfish, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:35 (eighteen years ago)
dogs are way better than people.
also: I saw a guy and his kid with a puppy that had its ears bandaged up from docking on Monday. I really wanted to yell at him but didn't due to presence of kid.
― jessie monster, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:36 (eighteen years ago)
Only white people do that.
― humansuit, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:41 (eighteen years ago)
I'm kind of not as emotionally responsive as I thought I might be, which is probably from watching too many episodes of Animal Cops and becoming jaded, but I am with some other folks like Wilbon in just being shocked at how somebody in his position could be this stupid and dishonest about the entire thing from the word go. We sure pay some dumb mother fuckers a fuck ton of money in this country.
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:41 (eighteen years ago)
I hate docking so much. EARS ARE CUTE, PEOPLE.
However, yes, "total grease fire" should be liberated from its source, it's too hilarious an insult.
― Jon Lewis, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:44 (eighteen years ago)
I'm pretty surprised he couldn't find something better than killing animals to spend his money on.
― jessie monster, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:45 (eighteen years ago)
oh I could never watch Animal Cops, i'd just want them to taze everybody. Or freak out like Beavis: "give 'em the chair! YEAH! the chair! the chair!"
― kingfish, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:45 (eighteen years ago)
It would be bad enough for Vick and his sponsors if it was just the dog fighting - but the things described in the indictment are some Jeffrey-Dahmer-as-a-child serial killer shit. Once people see the details more - how do you outrun electrocuting and hanging animals?
Charges dropped isn't enough, you need to be completely and totally "I was in another country!!!" exonerated to rebuild your career after that.
― milo z, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)
There will be none of that. You think that if everything is proved there will be a lifetime ban from the NFL? That would make me laugh and laugh.
― humansuit, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)
Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home. Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home. Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home. Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home. Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home. Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home. Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home. Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home. Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home. Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home. Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home. Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home. Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home. Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home. Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home.
― Steve Shasta, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:56 (eighteen years ago)
One time there was this horse on a farm that literally had a hole through its neck. Like, not an open wound. It had been an open wound at some point and then just healed around the wound so that the horse stopped being topologically equivalent to every other horse.
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:57 (eighteen years ago)
<i>There will be none of that. You think that if everything is proved there will be a lifetime ban from the NFL? That would make me laugh and laugh.</i>
Are you kidding? Do you follow sports?
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 17:58 (eighteen years ago)
this thread brought to you by Rupert Murdoch and the News at 10
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:00 (eighteen years ago)
You don't believe that if he gets 6 years for a felony conviction that they wouldn't ban him?
― humansuit, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:00 (eighteen years ago)
Wilbon's comments are interesting, if not somewhat shallow - probably written quickly with a deadline in mind. I am upset that I can't go home and watch PTI this afternoon.
His comments about this being a HUGE deal for the league is dead on. This guy was one creative head coach away from being a legend. Insanely fast, rocket of an arm, not totally incapable of running an offense. And he was playing in Atlanta, not a small, backwater of a town. He was on the cover of Madden NFL in 2004.
And, unlike a person with substance abuse or mental health issues, this guy has derailed a FABULOUSLY profitable business with WILLFUL behavior! That is cruelly harmful to animals that were raised with the express purpose of being harmed. And he has lost, regardless of the eventual outcome of the case, HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS. Think about that - I got a ticket for running a red light, and it meant I couldn't get a new iPod for a few months. This guy allegedly ran a very sophisticated dog fighting enterprise, and he won't be able to buy that new island he'd been looking at. What a douche.
You know, what this makes me think of is that Big Boi from Outkast has a pit bull kennel, too. I hope to God Almighty that he isn't involved in this or another dog fighting scene. It will cause me to seriously hate him, as well.
And yes, despite his ability to DEMOLISH teams out of play action sets, I want no part of this lunatic. He is OFF the team.
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:00 (eighteen years ago)
suit, you made it sound like NOTHING would happen to Vick if convicted!
― David R., Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:01 (eighteen years ago)
you are rather seriously overrating michael vick's quarterbacking ability.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:02 (eighteen years ago)
Ally, that guy could SHRED teams with the right coach. You know it.
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:03 (eighteen years ago)
which coach are you talking about? christ?
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:04 (eighteen years ago)
sry humansuit I read your comment backwards. I agree I don't think he'll play again.
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:05 (eighteen years ago)
If Godell's (sp?) handing out half-season suspensions for suspected DUI, Vick's going to get a lifetime ban and lose a hand.
(xpost)
How many coaches until the "right" one is found, tho? Vick's gone through at least 2.
(xpost x2)
― David R., Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:05 (eighteen years ago)
With raw talent like Vick's, you go through as many as you can afford.
Christ, Vince Lombardi, Patton. Whoever.
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:05 (eighteen years ago)
ditka??? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kpnl7_AK5FY
xpost lolololololol BLAM srsly you know i like you but sometimes i am like o_O when i read yr posts.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:06 (eighteen years ago)
No I was unclear my bad.
― humansuit, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:07 (eighteen years ago)
Michael Vick can't be coached.
― Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:08 (eighteen years ago)
Also: Christ was a five-step-drop motherfucker; he would've ruined Vick.
― David R., Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:09 (eighteen years ago)
Michael Vick should be coached via electric collar.
― bnw, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)
i would like michael vick to be coached by a pit bull. preferably in an adorable movie made by disney, where the pit bull talks, and wears a sporty cap. maybe also he smokes a cigar.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)
Only if Cuba Gooding, Jr. voices the pitbull.
― David R., Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:11 (eighteen years ago)
Perhaps that's it then. Vick must lead his team to victory in each game otherwise an appendage is removed after each loss.
― humansuit, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:12 (eighteen years ago)
no no no clearly the voice of the pitbull is armand assante.
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:13 (eighteen years ago)
produced b Disney, directed by the guy who did Hostel
― milo z, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:13 (eighteen years ago)
they should also use crazy forrest gump technology to put don knotts in the film, as the hapless assistant coach.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:13 (eighteen years ago)
lol humansuit, i hope vick has a lot of extra limbs lookin at the falcons' record last year.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:14 (eighteen years ago)
"Who got that motherfucking pick?" "Ty Law, coach." "LLLLLAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW!"
― David R., Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:15 (eighteen years ago)
don't make me break out tylaw&jakedelhommemilk.jpg again
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:16 (eighteen years ago)
i'm sorry i'm making this thread silly but i can't even begin to approach rationally discussing the actual case here other than to say that if it is true--and i don't think they'd have indicted him without pretty strong evidence linking him to this--i hope michael vick spends a long time in a jail cell.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:18 (eighteen years ago)
No team will win a Super Bowl with Vick at QB. It doesn't matter who the coach is, who the running back is, who the wide receivers are, or if he quits dropping off semen samples under the alias Ron Mexico. He's not going to win a Super Bowl because his style of play will not exceed NFL defenses. He isn't a legend without the Ring. Not to mention he's been busy derailing his career for the past several seasons.
This is not a huge deal for the league, which has, can, and will continue to survive legal fiascos like this. If Wilbon is shocked--SHOCKED--that a powerful dude will take a bunch of responsibility and toss it out the window on impulse, then he's exactly as stupid as I think he is.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:21 (eighteen years ago)
i was in a bar the other night and these two gay guys and this table of women WHO WERE SITTING CLEAR ACROSS THE ROOM FROM EACH OTHER were having a very loud discussion of the ron mexico scandal.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:22 (eighteen years ago)
like, one of the dudes broke from watching MAN V WILD on the tv and walked over to the ladies' table and started introducing himself under a fake name to illustrate how the ron mexico thing happened.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)
don are you going to trade wilbon off in madden as soon as you get home
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)
drunk ppl amirite
I don't have Madden, haven't played it in years. It's too addictive. But my kids want it pretty badly.
Fuck Wilbon. Although he's marginally more listenable than Kornheiser.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:24 (eighteen years ago)
ok anything is more listenable than kornheiser though
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:25 (eighteen years ago)
There is always the genitalia.
― humansuit, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:26 (eighteen years ago)
a brave new direction for disney
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:27 (eighteen years ago)
Oh god if Joe Buck holds court on this Vick shit like he held court on the Moss "mooning" fiasco, I will kill Tony Kornheiser.
― David R., Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:29 (eighteen years ago)
Tom, I can't, in good conscience, play as a Michael Vick-led version of the Ravens with my dog sitting next to me on the couch. Nope. Not gonna happen.
This guy should just go away.
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:31 (eighteen years ago)
you shouldn't, in good conscience, be playing that team whatsoever at all!!
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:33 (eighteen years ago)
Electrocution?! wtf
xpost otm
― brownie, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)
Michael Vick is a coach- dog- Christ-killer.
― Leee, Wednesday, 18 July 2007 20:59 (eighteen years ago)
https://community.hsus.org/campaign/US_2007_dogfighting_nfl2/
Humane Society started up a campaign
― kingfish, Thursday, 19 July 2007 07:05 (eighteen years ago)
lol @ bobby petrino even more now. have fun coaching joey harrington!
― hstencil, Thursday, 19 July 2007 07:42 (eighteen years ago)
lol, god
― cankles, Thursday, 19 July 2007 09:57 (eighteen years ago)
fuck due process too!
― chicago kevin, Thursday, 19 July 2007 10:17 (eighteen years ago)
u mad
― hstencil, Thursday, 19 July 2007 10:18 (eighteen years ago)
anyway yeah, the way this indictment came down so fast says a lot. i dont know a lot about this stuff but the possibility of RICO charges coming into play doesnt seem unlikely, not to mention the state charges that will probably be tacked on.
He's not going to win a Super Bowl because his style of play will not exceed NFL defenses.
that's not really the reason he won't succeed, he just has a shitty work ethic. that's the problem with dudes like vick, grossman, whoever, they just dont got the HUNGER 2 EXCEL. dudes who have to be pushed just to do the bare minimum to get by will get eaten alive, unless they are brett favre i guess, i don't know how that even worked out. (this is why jamarcus will be a bust btw)
and yeah obviously the league will survive this, but i think goodall's approach has already backfired PR-wise - making a big deal abt how tuff on trubblemakers ur gonna be, turning it into a storyline, i think it draws a lot more attn to the 'image problem' than it would have otherwise? like now there is a narrative about the NFL's image problem, where before these stories were reported like they happened in a vacuum.
― cankles, Friday, 20 July 2007 00:07 (eighteen years ago)
bobby cox is not a football coach
― Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 20 July 2007 00:08 (eighteen years ago)
Hey just NB, to people who are all "due process" about the endorsement issues, wouldn't this be the kind of crime where that'll get sorted out sooner rather than later? With something like a random murder you can claim total innocence to your grave, but given these charges I can't imagine how he'd possibly be able to make any sort of defense without making SOME kind of admission to being SOMEWHAT involved and/or interested in dogs tearing one another to shreds. No matter how much you try to push legal responsibility off onto someone else, "I have no idea what you're talking about" just isn't gonna fly as a defense.
― nabisco, Friday, 20 July 2007 00:25 (eighteen years ago)
What if the charges are completely false?
― humansuit, Friday, 20 July 2007 00:54 (eighteen years ago)
then he'll be exonerated.
― hstencil, Friday, 20 July 2007 00:56 (eighteen years ago)
But in terms of what Nabisco said.
― humansuit, Friday, 20 July 2007 00:59 (eighteen years ago)
so he loses some endorsements, big deal. he'd still be a multi-millionaire.
― hstencil, Friday, 20 July 2007 01:02 (eighteen years ago)
and he'll have a lot explainin' to do
― kingfish, Friday, 20 July 2007 01:02 (eighteen years ago)
I don't normally agree with Dandy Don, but he's OTM up at the top of the thread -- the charges wouldn't have been brought if the gov't didn't have everythng it needed. The only thing that'll save Vick is some procedural fuckup.
― Rock Hardy, Friday, 20 July 2007 01:08 (eighteen years ago)
I agree that it's 99% likely, however I still believe that due process must be followed first.
― humansuit, Friday, 20 July 2007 01:11 (eighteen years ago)
I don't believe the companies he has endorsement deals with owe him anything but money. If they want him gone, he's gone, fuck a due process. His employment contract with the NFL may be a different matter, but wasn't it either Tank or Pacman who was suspended just for arrests, not convictions?
― Rock Hardy, Friday, 20 July 2007 01:20 (eighteen years ago)
Pacman and Tank we at least know for sure there were there at the time, whereas Vick we don't. I think that would be the reasoning, although it's not a large distinction.
― humansuit, Friday, 20 July 2007 01:22 (eighteen years ago)
What if the charges are completely false?I don't normally agree with Dandy Don, but he's OTM up at the top of the thread -- the charges wouldn't have been brought if the gov't didn't have everythng it needed. The only thing that'll save Vick is some procedural fuckup.-- Rock Hardy, Friday, July 20, 2007 1:08 AM (17 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
-- Rock Hardy, Friday, July 20, 2007 1:08 AM (17 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
i dunno, it's not like scooter libby got found guilty of all counts.
― hstencil, Friday, 20 July 2007 01:27 (eighteen years ago)
black, white, puerto rican, mike vick is a rich scum bag, who as the thread title states, will get his uptight booty poked big time in the big house.
― nicky lo-fi, Friday, 20 July 2007 01:52 (eighteen years ago)
no he won't, he's got the herp.
― hstencil, Friday, 20 July 2007 01:55 (eighteen years ago)
so he loses some endorsements, big deal. he'd still be a multi-millionaire.-- hstencil, Friday, July 20, 2007 1:02 AM (59 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
-- hstencil, Friday, July 20, 2007 1:02 AM (59 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
RICO, dogg! they could hell of seize his assets if it goes down that road.
black, white, puerto rican
ppl who say this kind of thing are secret racialists~
― cankles, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:03 (eighteen years ago)
It's very hard for charges like these to be "completely false," though! Not like I've read over the indictment, or anything, but this is a whole dogfighting RING involving large expenditures on Vick's part to set it up -- i.e., there's a paper trail, loads of people involved, etc. By the time an indictment's brought, it's EXTREMELY unlikely that you can plausibly deny every single bit of it, every phone bill, credit card charge, property deed, everyone involved testifying against you. You can claim you were ignorant of the full scale of it, that you were just blindly giving money to other people who were doing it without your knowledge, that you got used, that you maybe did one thing wrong but not everything charged, that someone else was the bigger fish -- but no way are you gonna make headway trying to claim the entire thing is 100% untrue! That's like getting charged with embezzlement and going "what are you talking about, I never even worked there."
― nabisco, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:05 (eighteen years ago)
the hypothetical was whether he was exonerated, then what. fuk u if u can't read.
― hstencil, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:11 (eighteen years ago)
and i can't find that fuk u if u disagree gif, ade, so please re-post. surprised it hadn't been already.
― hstencil, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:12 (eighteen years ago)
nabisco is judge, jury AND SEXECUTIONER
― hstencil, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:13 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.tristatepunk.com/willdavidian/images/vickfinger.png
― cankles, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:14 (eighteen years ago)
-- cankles, Friday, July 20, 2007 2:03 AM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
cankles,
this no secret, suck my cock you internet slut.
― nicky lo-fi, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:15 (eighteen years ago)
if u are public racist then i have mad respect 4 u~
― cankles, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:17 (eighteen years ago)
yes! thanks aidsy.
― hstencil, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:18 (eighteen years ago)
you wanna hide behide calling people you don't know racist, or you wanna suck my cock?
pretty easy choice, if you knew how good the cock looks.
― nicky lo-fi, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:20 (eighteen years ago)
u mad, doggie! why u so shook, nicholas~
― cankles, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:21 (eighteen years ago)
Damn the West coast crowd is really into dicks, law, and racism. Plz.
― humansuit, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:23 (eighteen years ago)
i'm on the east coast, and really only into two of those three.
― hstencil, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:25 (eighteen years ago)
I'm not saying he's necessarily guilty of everything charged -- just that his defense is 98% likely to be something more nuanced than "I have no idea what you're talking about."
(That 2% is left open for the claim that he has no idea what you're talking about, and it's all clearly a very complex frame-up.)
― nabisco, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:26 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.sorryboutthat.com/wiki/images/6/67/Selfclowningoven.jpg
― cankles, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:28 (eighteen years ago)
Agreed, Nabisco. I believe it's a huge frame up too.
― humansuit, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:40 (eighteen years ago)
read the fucking indictment. I seriously doubt Ron Mexico is going to be able to ditch all the charges. For one, he bought the property and for another, he paid the bills on it. his hands are everywhere.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:50 (eighteen years ago)
Where are his hands on you?
― humansuit, Friday, 20 July 2007 02:51 (eighteen years ago)
yeah, everyone besides the cock-suckers otm basically? endorsements are not like a right that one has, it doesn't matter if he is exonerated, his image has been tarnished over and over and over again and this is basically a final straw for a lot of these companies i think? also the fact that y y y it is kind of impossible for him to not be implicated in this considering it's his shit and he paid the bills--theoretically, someone else could've been the ringleader but there's no way that he's going to ever be considered stain-free by the general public.
so, dropped endorsement deals. who gives a shit, i never understood why such a boring, erratic, meh dude got any of those deals to begin with.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 20 July 2007 16:42 (eighteen years ago)
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118489415133372502.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Nike Delays Vick's Shoe After NFL Star Is Indicted
Nike Inc. suspended the release of a shoe endorsed by Atlanta Falcons quarterback Michael Vick, the second time in about a year that the athletic-footwear giant has taken the unusual step of cracking down on one of its star endorsers after alleged misbehavior.
― Rock Hardy, Friday, 20 July 2007 18:49 (eighteen years ago)
Think outside the box, Nike -- now is the perfect time to come out with the Signature Michael Vick "DogStomper" spiked cleat!
― nabisco, Friday, 20 July 2007 18:57 (eighteen years ago)
Red-on-white blood-splatter art painstakingly hand-painted by genuine Thai children.
― nabisco, Friday, 20 July 2007 18:58 (eighteen years ago)
http://artfiles.art.com/images/-/Reservoir-Dogs-Poster-C10027430.jpeg
― kingfish, Friday, 20 July 2007 19:11 (eighteen years ago)
the pix and vid they showed on the news hour last night were fucking heartbreaking.
― gff, Friday, 20 July 2007 19:24 (eighteen years ago)
http://fanaticking.com/photos/Michael_Vick_Dog.jpg
― kingfish, Saturday, 21 July 2007 07:34 (eighteen years ago)
yeah, everyone besides the cock-suckers otm basically?
hey now that's uncalled for ally :'(
i wish we could change our login names cuz i would so be "Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home." right now
― cankles, Saturday, 21 July 2007 18:12 (eighteen years ago)
That Ladainian Tomlinson/Michael Vick trade just gets better and better every year. :D
― polyphonic, Saturday, 21 July 2007 20:24 (eighteen years ago)
Fuck You, Emmitt Smith
― Rock Hardy, Saturday, 21 July 2007 23:22 (eighteen years ago)
Fuck BBCode too.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=2944662
― Rock Hardy, Saturday, 21 July 2007 23:23 (eighteen years ago)
dude plead not guilty today, right?
anyway, Deion Sanders wrote this bit in support. Great.
― kingfish, Friday, 27 July 2007 07:02 (eighteen years ago)
Is it too late for him to be a backup behind Harrington in Madden? Good riddance to the man whose athletic ability was reflected in video games in such a way to make Tecmo Bowl feel like Super Simulated Football Game 2050.
― Cunga, Friday, 27 July 2007 07:40 (eighteen years ago)
deion sanders is a confounding, confounding man. the worst thing on the nfl network is their multiple-times-per-week update from deion's fucking barber shop. because, clearly, people most qualified to analyze intricate rule working and trades and legal dramas of various players are a bona fide batshit nuts dude and his posse of random old dudes who just wanted to get a goddamned haircut.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 July 2007 14:39 (eighteen years ago)
by worst i mean "best thing except the execution is so awful due to fact that deion really is kind of intolerable though not quite michael irvin yet"
i DO enjoy the fact that his "i support michael vick" editorial contains like a pretty lengthy middle section talking about how awesome deion's german shepherds are and how they will rip your testicles off if you fuck with deion, though.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 July 2007 14:41 (eighteen years ago)
The logic of Deion Sanders is pretty hilarious.
― jessie monster, Friday, 27 July 2007 15:06 (eighteen years ago)
it is BASICALLY the best editorial i have ever read
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 July 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)
We're attacking this dogfighting ring the same way a teenager attacks his MySpace page after school (by the way parents, make sure you monitor your kids).
Okay I fully agree with Ally.
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 27 July 2007 15:11 (eighteen years ago)
It had been an open wound at some point and then just healed around the wound so that the horse stopped being topologically equivalent to every other horse
^^^ this
kudos
― river wolf, Friday, 27 July 2007 15:14 (eighteen years ago)
Wow @ Deion. Yeah, I'm sure he loved those dogs. Not in the mouth-kissing way, more in the leave-the-carcass-to-rot way.
― kenan, Friday, 27 July 2007 15:18 (eighteen years ago)
Today, I learned that Michael Vick wanting to watch dogs tear each other apart is kinda like Deion wanting to wear lots of jewelry. It's about status, understand?
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 27 July 2007 15:18 (eighteen years ago)
Dude, you don't understand. IT'S JUST LIKE ULTIMATE FIGHTING.
― jessie monster, Friday, 27 July 2007 15:18 (eighteen years ago)
Maybe he identified with those big, strong, bad-ass dogs so much that he HAD to watch them tear each other's throats out?
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 27 July 2007 15:21 (eighteen years ago)
Maybe he needs rehab. He needs our sympathy, not our condemnation!
― kenan, Friday, 27 July 2007 15:23 (eighteen years ago)
well, this thread just reminds me of that one scene in new jack city
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 July 2007 15:27 (eighteen years ago)
chris rock and the crack pipe?
― hstencil, Friday, 27 July 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)
yes
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, 27 July 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)
Now, granted he might have been to a dogfight a time or two, maybe five times, maybe 20 times, may have bet some money, but he's not the one you're after.
http://www.filmwise.com/contests/contest_07/image_14a.jpg
― Phil D., Friday, 27 July 2007 15:34 (eighteen years ago)
Deion Sanders lives around the corner from a police station is all I could understand from the editorial.
― brownie, Friday, 27 July 2007 15:44 (eighteen years ago)
it's like that scene in New Jack City where the guy lives around the corner from a police station
― brownie, Friday, 27 July 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)
Deion probably rambled that as a voicemail to his hapless assistant on his way to dinner or something and told her to transcribe it. I refuse to believe he has the concentration or attention span to actually type, let alone use a pen.
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 27 July 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)
Sanders's full-on bullshit is somehow less annoying to me than Smith's characterizing dogfighting as some kind of youthful enthusiasm that you have to grow up and be professional and leave behind -- apparently it's not reprehensible and awful, it's just more like partying too late or wearing shorts all the time. I mean, Sanders's "taking you inside the brain" is at least useful and accidentally honest, in that he winds up more or less admitting that he is an idiot and thinks dogfighting is cool.
Smith offering exactly the defense I predicted: "Now, granted he might have been to a dogfight a time or two, maybe five times, maybe 20 times, may have bet some money, but he's not the one you're after." This scans like total "I haven't read the indictment" bullshit, though -- it's not a bet, there's a money trail! Dude OWNED the stuff. (Allegedly.) And if he really WERE some kind of casual low-level participant, he's an idiot for not having cooperated with the investigation a long, long time ago. (Though I suspect that column upthread where someone references "cultural issues" is talking about snitching as much as just thinking dogfights are okay.) Anyway: money trail. You can't skeeze your way out from under a money trail.
― nabisco, Friday, 27 July 2007 16:14 (eighteen years ago)
"passion for dogfighting"
― Sparkle Motion, Friday, 27 July 2007 19:24 (eighteen years ago)
I really can't get past the part of Deion's bullshit that basically asserts that Vick, as a pro athlete, should be given the benefit of the doubt because other pro athletes have been victims of violent crime. Really? What?
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 27 July 2007 19:29 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.davesez.com/images/Vick.JPG
― hstencil, Friday, 27 July 2007 19:48 (eighteen years ago)
favorite parts: "It's like ultimate fighting, but the dog doesn't tap out when he knows he can't win." What else don't dogs do, Deion? Brush their teeth?
"Can I pause for a moment to ask you a question?" haha
― bnw, Friday, 27 July 2007 19:55 (eighteen years ago)
Has Michael Irvin weighed in on this yet? I can barely wait!
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 27 July 2007 19:55 (eighteen years ago)
"It's like ultimate fighting, but with more grievous injury and unnecessary death. So ... you know, it's got that going for it."
― nabisco, Friday, 27 July 2007 21:02 (eighteen years ago)
I really think that the way you feel and/or act on this matter, unless you are an attorney for either side, is dependant upon one thing:
Do you have a problem with dogfighting?
If yes, you shouldn't support Michael Vick w/r/t this case.
If no, you could support Michael Vick w/r/t this case.
God help Deion, Vick's attorney or anyone else who openly supports Vick when they have to explain to their kids why Vick isn't a bad guy b/c he raised dogs to die in violent conflict with each other, and you still have to walk the dog three times a day b/c its mean otherwise.
Warrick Dunn made a statement which I regard as relatively classy, and all the more absolutely classy when compared to Deion's: "This football team is a family, and one of our brothers is going through a situation," Dunn said. "When you have a family member who's going through something, you have to support that family member and be there for them while at the same time knowing that we have other guys on this team that we have to support and also push to be better on the football field. We're still going to support Mike, but right now we have to get ready for the football season."
But, at the end of the day, fuck Michael Vick. I've got a dog, and you don't fuck with dogs. Dogs fucking rule.
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 27 July 2007 22:02 (eighteen years ago)
Dan Wetzel on the courthouse shenanigans, re: protestors v. supporters and the racial breakdown
― kingfish, Friday, 27 July 2007 23:38 (eighteen years ago)
^^^ I have a low-expectations bigotry about sports writing, which means half the time I read any I'm all like "wow, that was very nicely turned out." As a side-note, though:
1. Given the whole history of the U.S., people aren't really surprised that when successful black people are accused of crimes, other black people stay a little skeptical and want to hear out the details at trial, are they?
2. Given a whole bunch of other dynamics, people aren't really surprised that Americans have a weirdo love/resentment/scorn issue going on with black professional athletes, one that manifests itself in feeling especially entitled to let out the abuse on them for fuck-ups both real and imagined?
― nabisco, Saturday, 28 July 2007 00:16 (eighteen years ago)
1. Definitely not. But also: OJ, and the possibility that there's a parallel element of really really hoping he's got nothing to do with it that's racialized for supporters in a way that it wouldn't be if we were talking about say, Bill Romanowski.
2. Sadly, no. Though possibly complicated in a way that has as much to do with the privilege accorded athletes as it does with race. See Lacrosse, Duke. This might be simpler if "being a asshole" were a punishable offense.
― rogermexico., Saturday, 28 July 2007 00:42 (eighteen years ago)
deion sanders is a confounding, confounding man. the worst thing on the nfl network is their multiple-times-per-week update from deion's fucking barber shop. because, clearly, people most qualified to analyze intricate rule working and trades and legal dramas of various players are a bona fide batshit nuts dude and his posse of random old dudes who just wanted to get a goddamned haircut.-- the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, July 27, 2007 2:39 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link
-- the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Friday, July 27, 2007 2:39 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link
omg ally did you see when deion was on and he had this crazy al gore beard (grey too!) and jamie asked why redd foxx was on the set, it was amaze~
i think deion and irvin are the most entertaining dudes in the world so mb i am not best person to weigh in on this. deion is smarter though, he's a really good analyst when he doesnt mind breaking character or whatever~
― cankles, Saturday, 28 July 2007 01:20 (eighteen years ago)
big article in the paper recently about Deion taking in a dozen kids w/o fathers for the summer, giving them chores/tutors/Bible study/etc.. Which seems great, but then again he's an enormous douche and always has been (moreso since the born-again phase, I think - flashy cokeheads I'm ok with, self-righteous flashy evangelicals not so much) and I really don't want him around children at all.
― milo z, Saturday, 28 July 2007 01:25 (eighteen years ago)
it's so awesome being a Cowboys fan. Cankles 80386.
― wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 28 July 2007 01:40 (eighteen years ago)
Perhaps Deion should take in some foster dogs. LIke ex-fighting dogs who can't be pets, because their former owners made them deranged.
xpost
― Super Cub, Saturday, 28 July 2007 01:44 (eighteen years ago)
it's so awesome being a Cowboys fan. Cankles 80386.-- wanko ergo sum, Saturday, July 28, 2007 1:40 AM (15 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
-- wanko ergo sum, Saturday, July 28, 2007 1:40 AM (15 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
ja rite
― hstencil, Saturday, 28 July 2007 01:56 (eighteen years ago)
The allure is the intensity and the challenge of a dog fighting to the death. It's like ultimate fighting, but the dog doesn't tap out when he knows he can't win.
"The allure is the passion and the challenge of getting something you couldn't have otherwise. Rape is just like sex, the only different is it's usually harder for the woman to have a good time when she's fighting the moment, know what I mean?"
― Cunga, Saturday, 28 July 2007 03:53 (eighteen years ago)
I had to go back and read that editorial a second time. That may be the stupidest, nastiest thing I've ever read. I'm certain Vick loved his dogs to pieces. I hate--truly hate--this man, his mindset, and his fucked up deeds.
― Sparkle Motion, Saturday, 28 July 2007 05:31 (eighteen years ago)
i wish blount was here 2 weigh in on dis~
idk what this even means :((((
― cankles, Saturday, 28 July 2007 06:34 (eighteen years ago)
It means you need an upgrade.
― David R., Saturday, 28 July 2007 06:51 (eighteen years ago)
ron mexico alias generator
― hstencil, Monday, 30 July 2007 13:43 (eighteen years ago)
I have a low-expectations bigotry about sports writing,
i find it amazing that someone who purports to be interested in writing would say something like this.
also yes i think i did see that beardy episode??? i really wish that the nfl network would basically shut down during the off-season, or only show the "brett favre: he did a lot of drugs lol" episode of america's game over and over again, because the shit they come up with to pass the time during the summer is like woah.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Monday, 30 July 2007 14:24 (eighteen years ago)
like you're not GLUED to training camp coverage, ally.
― hstencil, Monday, 30 July 2007 14:27 (eighteen years ago)
i don't even HAVE the nfl network at my new apt!! otherwise...i would be.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Monday, 30 July 2007 14:38 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.11alive.com/news/article_news.aspx?storyid=100887
rofflez.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Monday, 30 July 2007 16:10 (eighteen years ago)
The rally was organized by New Order -- a human rights group based in Marietta.
Were I to organize a human rights group, this would not be the name I'd choose for about three, maybe eight reasons.
― kingfish, Monday, 30 July 2007 16:16 (eighteen years ago)
otm, sports writing is consistently some of the best feature writing out there.
― kenan, Monday, 30 July 2007 16:18 (eighteen years ago)
I don't know why it'd be so amazing -- I'm admitting that it's total blind-spot bigotry on my part! There is some truly terrible sports column writing in the world, and I wind up assuming it's all like that, and so I'm stupidly surprised to come across the good stuff. I'm sure if I read more about sports, my brain would readjust and realize that lots of it is good, but for the time being it's just kind of stuck. It helps that I'm pretty conscious of that.
LOL "purports"
― nabisco, Monday, 30 July 2007 16:36 (eighteen years ago)
Read SI sometime. Or even ESPN.com.
― kenan, Monday, 30 July 2007 16:37 (eighteen years ago)
"i find it amazing that someone who purports to be interested in writing would say something like this."
oh c'mon dude who are all these great sports writers yall are reading? i want in on that shit, cuz i dont see them anywhere :[
ally they post the CHOICEST HIGHLIGHTS each week at nfl.com/video! i dont know if the beard thing is up but i should find it, take a screenshot and print it onto a t-shirt~
― cankles, Monday, 30 July 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)
dont listen to them dogg SI is trash except for zimmerman
I think Marshawn Lynch impressed me off the field the other day, after showing terrific moves on the field. Lynch was telling me how much he loves to watch Michael Vick play, and how last year at Cal he never watched much football, but every time Vick was on, it was appointment TV. And I asked him if he thought Vick was getting a fair shake and if he thought the charges against him were fair. (Which, of course, Lynch can't know. But I was trolling for his opinion in case he had a strong one.)"I don't feel I'm in a place to have an opinion on that,'' he said. "I don't know anything about the case. So I really shouldn't say anything.''Maybe Deion Sanders should go to the Marshawn Lynch School of Intelligence.
"I don't feel I'm in a place to have an opinion on that,'' he said. "I don't know anything about the case. So I really shouldn't say anything.''
Maybe Deion Sanders should go to the Marshawn Lynch School of Intelligence.
ooh burrrrn
― cankles, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 03:02 (eighteen years ago)
the thought of kenan reading skip bayless = mind blown
― hstencil, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 03:05 (eighteen years ago)
What cankles said - outside of some Baseball Prospectus alumni & associates, Dan Pasquarelli, and Henry Abbott (RIP David Aldridge), ESPN.com is shit on a Ritz with a whole tube of Cheez Whiz riding shotgun - their big guns are either well past their sell-by date (Peter Gammons ;_;) or monosyllabic assclowns angling to guest host Mike & Mike. & the site still kicks the shit out of the flap-slapping jackanapes @ Sports Illustrated (Dr Z. notwithstanding).
NB: I might be full of shit.
― David R., Tuesday, 31 July 2007 03:55 (eighteen years ago)
no, you're pretty much spot on.
ESPN.com and ESPN Radio - particularly without my Dan & Keith Hour ;_; - makes me almost as violent as Day by Day.
― milo z, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 04:09 (eighteen years ago)
I'm a peace-loving dude, but given half a chance I'd turn Skip Bayless into the girl in the hole from Silence of the Lambs.
― milo z, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 04:10 (eighteen years ago)
congrats, you're the new shakey.
― hstencil, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 04:12 (eighteen years ago)
For Skip, I'm okay with that.
― milo z, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 04:13 (eighteen years ago)
fair enough. as long as you can spend thousands so you don't have to wear glasses.
― hstencil, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 04:14 (eighteen years ago)
Thank god for Ebay, eh?
― milo z, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 04:16 (eighteen years ago)
dick cheney says it's turning us all into entrepreneurs.
but are you paying taxes on it?
― hstencil, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 04:17 (eighteen years ago)
Not if I can help it.
― milo z, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 04:18 (eighteen years ago)
kudos, you make shakey look good now.
― hstencil, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 04:18 (eighteen years ago)
Such is life.
― milo z, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 04:19 (eighteen years ago)
just don't fight any dogs, bro.
― hstencil, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 04:20 (eighteen years ago)
I'd lose anyway.
― milo z, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 04:21 (eighteen years ago)
haha i actually don't mind bayless anymore, not after realizing that it's all a put-on. he is so ridiculous and ott that he sort of makes being a blowhard into something transcendent. also he wears great suits.
footballoutsiders.com has one good writer too but otherwise they are pretty crappy
― cankles, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 06:47 (eighteen years ago)
damn: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vLGVvD7A0Y
― sanskrit, Friday, 3 August 2007 12:16 (eighteen years ago)
UK fan, natch.
― hstencil, Friday, 3 August 2007 12:19 (eighteen years ago)
he accepted the plea.
I wonder if he will enjoy prison bitchdom.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Monday, 20 August 2007 18:43 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/law/08/20/vick/index.html
Innocent until proven guilty, ect.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Monday, 20 August 2007 18:44 (eighteen years ago)
Talk about pissing a nice career away.
― Bill Magill, Monday, 20 August 2007 18:57 (eighteen years ago)
somebody wake me up when we outgrow this kind of garbage
― J0hn D., Monday, 20 August 2007 19:29 (eighteen years ago)
ya i was gonna say somethin abt that, but i guess it's just don... bein don.
― cankles, Monday, 20 August 2007 20:09 (eighteen years ago)
a dandy wonders
― jeff, Monday, 20 August 2007 20:24 (eighteen years ago)
What kinda garbage, John? Being gleeful at the thought of a sadist millionaire getting it up the bum by some frothing-at-the-mouth skinhead maniac? If that's 'garbage,' pleased to meet ya, my name is Oscar The Grouch.
Not to state the obvious, but in a Tales From The Crypt 'punishment befitting the crime' kinda way, I say they oughta throw Vick to the fucking wolves.
― If Assholes Could Fly This Place Would Be An Airport, Monday, 20 August 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)
he's talkin bout makin rape jokes when it concerns male rape, esp prison rape~
i cant really tut-tut anyone for doing it cuz rape jokes are my bread and butter but it is an uncool thing 2 do unless u are pro-rape in general imo
― cankles, Monday, 20 August 2007 20:38 (eighteen years ago)
i would say "$10 sez vick doesn't get so much as lightly slapped by another prisoner while in the can" but that probably puts me on his level.
― hstencil, Monday, 20 August 2007 20:43 (eighteen years ago)
What's this world coming to??
Doesn't anyone watch Oz??????
(PS unfortunately I think you're probably right hstencil)
― If Assholes Could Fly This Place Would Be An Airport, Monday, 20 August 2007 20:50 (eighteen years ago)
Oh I don't know. Rick Fox didn't look like he had a very good time in OZ.
― Alex in SF, Monday, 20 August 2007 20:50 (eighteen years ago)
HAHA xpost.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
― Dandy Don Weiner, Monday, 20 August 2007 21:09 (eighteen years ago)
edgy
― J0hn D., Monday, 20 August 2007 21:24 (eighteen years ago)
idk john he raises some salient points
― cankles, Monday, 20 August 2007 21:24 (eighteen years ago)
it'd be nice if J0hn would raise a salient point instead of pretending to be the garbage patrol for prison rape victims.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Monday, 20 August 2007 21:54 (eighteen years ago)
yeah everybody knows those prison rape victims have such strong advocates in the media and in politics.
― hstencil, Monday, 20 August 2007 21:58 (eighteen years ago)
Wasn't Modest Mickey lambasting us for ignoring this very same issue back before he got banned?
― Alex in SF, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:04 (eighteen years ago)
well he had what you could call a vested interest.
― hstencil, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:04 (eighteen years ago)
The prison rape jokes always get the biggest laughs in The Laramie Project.
― Kerm, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:05 (eighteen years ago)
I'd say there's a big difference between making fun of rape and wondering aloud if Vick is going to get victimized in prison.
Not to mention the fact that there seems to be a sliding set of morals when it comes to vengeance on ILX.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:08 (eighteen years ago)
was it ever determined what in fact he got caught with? illegal music seemed so flimsy
― kingfish, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:08 (eighteen years ago)
he got caught with a bellybutton ring.
IT NEVER GETS OLD
― hstencil, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:11 (eighteen years ago)
when it does you can buy a new one
― J0hn D., Monday, 20 August 2007 22:15 (eighteen years ago)
i leave the esoteric piercings to alternative musicians, john.
not sure what you'd be mad at me for since i agree with you about don's dumb comments anyway.
― hstencil, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:16 (eighteen years ago)
apparently you revealed your true colors to J0hn when you said what you said you thought about saying.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:21 (eighteen years ago)
in english please don?
― hstencil, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:22 (eighteen years ago)
I'm only speculating, but I guess maybe this is what got J0hn mad at you
the sanctimony of calling out garbage in a thread titled as such is just a little more than I can take with a straight face.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:25 (eighteen years ago)
don, i didn't wish a light slap on him, much less anal rape. i would think john could tell the difference but i don't wanna speak for him.
― hstencil, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:27 (eighteen years ago)
plus, there's that whole irony thing with the gambling aspect. understandably it might take you a minute or three to get that.
― hstencil, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:28 (eighteen years ago)
I didn't wish anything on him either; I got the gambling thing right off the bad dude. I may be a retard but I'm not that stupid. But if you even allude to prison rape here, it's garbage. Never mind the endless stream of vicious garbage depicted and directed towards celebrities, politicians, and other ILXors on a daily basis.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:33 (eighteen years ago)
er, "bat" not bad
stence I was just riffing w/you, not sniping! I save my sniping for lame har har prison rape amirite stuff
― J0hn D., Monday, 20 August 2007 22:37 (eighteen years ago)
the rather poor joke was: bellybutton ring => "it never gets old" => pretend "it" refers to bellybutton ring => "if it gets old you can buy a new one"
― J0hn D., Monday, 20 August 2007 22:39 (eighteen years ago)
ok dudes, I apologize for my crass comment which, at the time, I didn't think was so out of line. There's nothing funny about rape. You're right J0hn, we need less garbage around here.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:45 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.tigergeneral.com/images/photos/tiger_hug.jpg
― nabisco, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:52 (eighteen years ago)
don, dont buckle under the pressure! u do u, dogg. u do u.
― cankles, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:52 (eighteen years ago)
HAHAHGLhglkhasdglksnbisco
― cankles, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:53 (eighteen years ago)
cankles I'm a big believer in taking people at their word, I'm not here to go "Don you said something kinda bogus so fuck you 4ever"
that would have been my younger self tho admittedly
― J0hn D., Monday, 20 August 2007 22:53 (eighteen years ago)
"fuk u 4ever" is pretty much my philosophy abt everything, btw fuk all of u for making this thread about some pussbaby bullsquid >:[
― cankles, Monday, 20 August 2007 22:58 (eighteen years ago)
cankles i thot your philosophy was summed up by that vick jpg, "fuk u if u disagree"
― hstencil, Monday, 20 August 2007 23:11 (eighteen years ago)
they should replace "e pluribus unum" with that amirite
― J0hn D., Monday, 20 August 2007 23:14 (eighteen years ago)
in vick we trus
― hstencil, Monday, 20 August 2007 23:19 (eighteen years ago)
I dunno, it's not like I have a lot of pride to lose around here anyway. I've apologized before and I'm sure I'll do it again.
(Actually, I started wondering what I would think if one of my kids posted something like that...the moral math gets a lot clearer when you think that way.)
― Dandy Don Weiner, Monday, 20 August 2007 23:28 (eighteen years ago)
The whole case has now been justified because it has elicited the greatest political comment of our young century. Money line:
Dog fighting is cruel and inhumane. But if Vick could have figured out a way to pit two unborn babies against each other in a fight to the death, maybe we'd outlaw killing children as quickly as we rushed to enhance penalties for crimes involving our pets.
― J0hn D., Tuesday, 21 August 2007 01:05 (eighteen years ago)
dude why are you even reading that
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 01:07 (eighteen years ago)
J0hn how is this note the money line!
"If Terry Schiavo was a dolphin or a dog (or a wale)she would still be alive today"
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 01:15 (eighteen years ago)
I was just about to post that quote!
― Clay, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 01:16 (eighteen years ago)
DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY DOLPHINS AND DOGS AND WHALES ARE IN PERSISTIVE VEGETATIVE STATES??!?! AND THOSE DAMN LIBERALS WANT TO USE OUR FUCKING TAX DOLLARS TO KEEP THE DAMN THINGS ALIVE! IT'S A TRAVESTY!
― Alex in SF, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 01:20 (eighteen years ago)
mookie it was linked from another blog I read and the lulz were contagious!
Alex that one line admittedly is some money, but the real cash money is two unborn babies fighting each other in a pit, I mean who would not pay top dollar to see that
― J0hn D., Tuesday, 21 August 2007 01:35 (eighteen years ago)
sonogram_slapfight.jpg
― Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 01:39 (eighteen years ago)
I'm pretty ok with in utero dogfighting too, actually
― milo z, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 01:44 (eighteen years ago)
Lester Munson's summary/analysis at ESPN is really good. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=munson_lester&id=2983319
― Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 03:17 (eighteen years ago)
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/7144402?MSNHPHCP>1=10347
Embattled Atlanta Falcon Michael Vick has a friend — and fellow doggie disrespecter — in Stephon Marbury.
"I think we don't say anything about people who shoot deer or shoot other animals," the Knick point guard told Capital News 9, an Albany TV station. "You know, from what I understand, dogfighting is a sport. It's just behind closed doors.
"I think it's tough that we build up Michael Vick and then we break him down."
― kingfish, Thursday, 23 August 2007 05:53 (eighteen years ago)
so well anyway, does anyone else think it's really fucked up that they're apparently just going to euthanize the nearly 60 dogs seized from vick? WAY TO SAVE DOGS FROM THE BAD PPL, VIRGINIA.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:37 (eighteen years ago)
I thought it was generally believed that dogs trained to be aggressive/fight couldn't be re-trained?
― milo z, Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:38 (eighteen years ago)
RIP
― jeff, Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:40 (eighteen years ago)
that isn't true at all, there are quite a few facilities that have been successful in retraining dogs. also some of the dogs are young and might not have been fought yet.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:41 (eighteen years ago)
it just seems really fucked up to go ahead and kill all the dogs anyway.
those dogs were already dead
anyhow, PETA disagrees with you
― jeff, Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:43 (eighteen years ago)
If you want to try to rehab one of 'em, be my guest. You might wake up one day with your guts strewn all over, though. They'll be put to sleep in a more painless manner than Bad Newz Kennels did it.
― Rock Hardy, Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:43 (eighteen years ago)
yeah, you know, i'm not really sure why i brought up the point on a msg board that has that repulsive-until-recently pit bull thread, actually.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:45 (eighteen years ago)
They probably have shelter overcrowding issues, and I dunno if "RESCUED FROM DEATH AT THE HANDS OF MICHAEL VICK" will attract a lot of potential owners. Pits have a hard time being re-homed even if they weren't fighting.
― jessie monster, Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:45 (eighteen years ago)
People for the Euthanization of Tons of Animals
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:45 (eighteen years ago)
hi they were seized by a very very rich man who is being penalized by the law for his actions, seems like it'd be real easy to get a big fine out of the dude as well to pay for the dogs to be housed in one of countless pit rescue shelters for the rest of their lives and, like, i don't know, make some kind of statement about the dogs instead of just killing them.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:47 (eighteen years ago)
I dunno if "RESCUED FROM DEATH AT THE HANDS OF MICHAEL VICK" will attract a lot of potential owners.
That's probably the ONLY thing that would save any of 'em. "This dog is SO tough..."
― Rock Hardy, Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:47 (eighteen years ago)
but the thing is that no one actually does care about the dogs because 98% of america secretly thinks that pits are gross and vicious anyway lol.
Ally, I totally get your point...but isn't it understandable that some folks might have a slight problem with having a formerly fighting trained pit-bull around the house? Regardless of the quality/success of re-training?
I own a dog, I hate seeing animals unnecessarily euthanized, but some of these dogs might be beyond help, right? Would you want your kids playing with them?
― B.L.A.M., Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:50 (eighteen years ago)
eBay Back to list of items Listed in category: Dogs > Rescued > Celebrity > Pitbulls AUTHENTIC MICHAEL VICK PITBULL w/ COURT CERTIFICATION Pre-owned MICHAEL VICK pitbull, NO RES Item number: 12015273465 Bidder or seller of this item? Sign in for your status Watch this item in My eBay
― nabisco, Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:51 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.alarmingnews.com/archives/billboardNYC.jpg
― kenan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:51 (eighteen years ago)
And I spent a lovely afternoon on Saturday with a really nice female pit bull, so I am not one of the "Ew, pit bull. Gross!" folks.
― B.L.A.M., Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:51 (eighteen years ago)
Ally I'm not sure I get where the high-horsiness comes in about pitbulls: what exactly is wrong with some people deciding they're a bit high-risk and deciding to get a collie instead? What business is it of ours if some people find them "gross" or unappealing?
― nabisco, Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:54 (eighteen years ago)
I mean, I can understand getting annoyed in those areas where people try to ban them or put extraordinary restrictions on them, but if people happen to just not be fond of the breed, I'm not sure why we're gonna pretend that's some failing on their part. I'm not fond of pugs, myself.
― nabisco, Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:57 (eighteen years ago)
nabisco, it's because they have an unfair bad rep, perpetuated by terrible people like michael vick
― kenan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:58 (eighteen years ago)
also i think the thrust of the point is that killing all the animals should not be the go-to option
― kenan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 17:59 (eighteen years ago)
BUT the fact of the matter here is that none of us know these dogs personally. They could be sweet, they could be re-trainable, but it's just as likely that they're badly abused, very badly socialized animals that will never know how to do anything but attack. You can't have those around. It's sad and it's not the dog's fault, but still.
― kenan, Thursday, 23 August 2007 18:04 (eighteen years ago)
yeah tbh i don't really care what happens to the dogs lol. the necessity of killin hell of animals that aren't wanted used to really make me mad/sad but i guess i am just really used to it now. also, living in a kennel all your fuckin life SUCKS. it's shitty for a dog to live like that so they are prob better off dead~
― cankles, Thursday, 23 August 2007 18:14 (eighteen years ago)
Kenan, way otm, especially on the go-to option stmt.
― B.L.A.M., Thursday, 23 August 2007 19:31 (eighteen years ago)
kenan gets to be OTM for helping Nabisco to understand somebody else's point?
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 23 August 2007 19:46 (eighteen years ago)
Some people have all the luck.
― Laurel, Thursday, 23 August 2007 19:50 (eighteen years ago)
KENAN OTM
― jeff, Thursday, 23 August 2007 19:52 (eighteen years ago)
At least in LA, the latest is typically the greatest, Tom.
― B.L.A.M., Thursday, 23 August 2007 20:14 (eighteen years ago)
Kenan didn't help me to understand anyone's point: I wasn't talking about euthanasia, I was asking exactly how dismissive we want to be of people for being wary of a dog that's powerful and requires good training and ownership. The bad rep can be somewhat useful if it winnows down the ranks of pitbull owners to people who are confident that they know what they're doing with them. (This isn't because pitbulls are inherently always vicious -- it's because being the shitty owner/trainer of a puggle will mostly lead to pee-stained carpets and torn-up shoes, whereas being the shitty owner/trainer of a pitbull or a Rottweiler or whatever can create much more serious problems.)
― nabisco, Thursday, 23 August 2007 20:27 (eighteen years ago)
I mean, acknowledging that pitbulls have been bred to be serious, powerful dogs doesn't have to mean blaming them or acting like they're wild beasts -- it can mean respecting that they're serious, powerful dogs, and you shouldn't be messing with them unless you know what you're doing.
― nabisco, Thursday, 23 August 2007 20:30 (eighteen years ago)
I wasn't talking about euthanasia
i think everyone else was
― Jonathan Livingston Dickfarm, Thursday, 23 August 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)
I'd like to think it was fairly clear what I was responding to.
― nabisco, Thursday, 23 August 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)
I wonder if there are ever people who go to dog pounds offering to eat the euthanized dogs. Could you feed dogmeat to the hungry or do you have to incinerate them?
Because I seriously would rather eat dogmeat than, say, possum or squirrel.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Thursday, 23 August 2007 21:55 (eighteen years ago)
Hell no. I say this from my year as a teenage hunter, squirrel stew is great.
― kingfish, Thursday, 23 August 2007 21:57 (eighteen years ago)
Altho, much like with rabbit, you have to watch out for buckshot and hair getting into the final meal.
― kingfish, Thursday, 23 August 2007 21:58 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, skwirl is okay, I'd eat that before dog.
― Rock Hardy, Thursday, 23 August 2007 22:19 (eighteen years ago)
I've eaten squirrel stew. I guess it's basically a rat anyway.
It's just kind of illlogical that people are starving when we could be feeding them dog. I've eaten pigeon (horrible!) so I guess we could start there.
Holy shit, I just realized that we should start with Canadian Geese.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Thursday, 23 August 2007 22:26 (eighteen years ago)
Cats I would not eat.
Geese I would. Mmm-mmmmm.
Would you eat horse?
― kingfish, Thursday, 23 August 2007 22:48 (eighteen years ago)
I would eat horse. I ate glue once as a kid so that probably counts.
Plus, who knows what's actually in some of the sausage and hot dog (heh) products I've ingested in my life.
And yeah, I've actually been to a sausage factory. On a field trip, no less.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Friday, 24 August 2007 00:37 (eighteen years ago)
i will eat anything that does not eat meat. That excludes cats and dogs.
― kenan, Friday, 24 August 2007 00:39 (eighteen years ago)
horses are fine to eat, it's only because we used to use them as tranpo that we have a cultural bias against eating them
xpost a sausage factory besides ilx you mean, don...
― hstencil, Friday, 24 August 2007 00:41 (eighteen years ago)
I don't know why i know this, but horses were the main pack animal for the German Army during WWII. THey'd have them pull the artillery & supply wagons(remember the scene from Band of Brothers). During Stalingrad and late in the war, rations ran so low that most(all?) of the horses were killed & eaten by starving troops.
I would eat horse, but not dog.
― kingfish, Friday, 24 August 2007 00:43 (eighteen years ago)
Horse, rabbit, squirrel, possum - gamey and greasy. Yuck.
― milo z, Friday, 24 August 2007 01:11 (eighteen years ago)
fried rabbit is good.
― kingfish, Friday, 24 August 2007 01:12 (eighteen years ago)
http://img295.imageshack.us/img295/9667/sweetrevengeaa3.jpg
― Pleasant Plains, Friday, 24 August 2007 01:27 (eighteen years ago)
too bad that's not a pit
― hstencil, Friday, 24 August 2007 01:34 (eighteen years ago)
this one's for cankles
― hstencil, Friday, 24 August 2007 01:40 (eighteen years ago)
Monday may still have some surprises.
― Rock Hardy, Friday, 24 August 2007 03:21 (eighteen years ago)
No honest person plays with the Falcons on Madden online. It's a fact. Playing some clowns this week and getting burned by cheap Vick plays makes me miss him even less. Don't even get me started on his defeat of the Packers in 2004.
I could care less what he did to dogs, as long as he's gone from computer games forever.
― Cunga, Friday, 24 August 2007 03:35 (eighteen years ago)
The source said Vick maintains he never killed dogs and never gambled on a dog fight.
He will admit he was present when dogs were killed, but that he did not personally kill any of the dogs.
Let the career rehab begin!
― Dandy Don Weiner, Friday, 24 August 2007 11:28 (eighteen years ago)
Jamie Foxx, professional retard:
“It’s a cultural thing, I think. Most brothers didn’t know that, you know. I used to see dogs fighting in the neighborhood all the time. I didn’t know that was Fed time. So, Mike probably just didn’t read his handbook on what not to do as a black star. I know that cruelty to animals is bad, but sometimes people shoot people and kill people and don’t get time. I think in this situation,he really didn’t know the extent of it, so I always give him the benefit of the doubt.”
― Dandy Don Weiner, Friday, 24 August 2007 14:34 (eighteen years ago)
groan
― kenan, Friday, 24 August 2007 14:44 (eighteen years ago)
Fuck You, Jamie Foxx
― kenan, Friday, 24 August 2007 14:49 (eighteen years ago)
Gah, that's depressing.
A guy called into a local show yesterday and told this story: he was pretty familiar with dog fighting, knew a bit about the scene and disapproved, and was exposed to dogfight videos at parties and such. He claimed that his husky was stolen from him, and he suspected right away where he'd been taken--to train up pits. He couldn't find the dog, but was pretty sure that he later saw his dog torn to shreds in a doggie snuff film.
The context of the call was that he wanted to explain some of the other aspects of dogfighting, and he said it was just a part of a bigger street culture that involved a lot of other criminal activity. He was not emotionally critical of the scene, and he didn't go after Vick at all, he seemed pretty low key on the whole thing. It was more like he was just sad about his dog.
― Hunt3r, Friday, 24 August 2007 15:29 (eighteen years ago)
I couldn't figure out if his seemingly dispassionate response made him more or less credible.
― Hunt3r, Friday, 24 August 2007 15:31 (eighteen years ago)
makes him eligible for mental treatment
― El Tomboto, Friday, 24 August 2007 15:32 (eighteen years ago)
Either that, or he's told this story SO many times in the past month that he's determined that people will pay a lot more attention to what he's saying if he adopts an informed, but dispassionate, approach to talking about it. There have been a lot of polemics on either side here.
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 24 August 2007 15:40 (eighteen years ago)
Or maybe he thinks about it as some animals are bred to die in for fights and that's okay, but pets are different cos they're bred to be our friends. That's their reason for existing right? Just like some animals are bred to die in slaughterhouses and people are generally cool with that too.
― NickB, Friday, 24 August 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)
They should stick Jamie Foxx's Oscar up his ass. What a total prick.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse, last I checked. And if he didn't know it was illegal, why was he doing this shit in a secluded house with blacked out windows?
― Bill Magill, Friday, 24 August 2007 15:58 (eighteen years ago)
The worst thing to me is Foxx trying to sneak in some race-based bullshit, like the Man is just fucking with black culture or something.
― kenan, Friday, 24 August 2007 16:02 (eighteen years ago)
"Black people kill dogs. It's just what we do."
― kenan, Friday, 24 August 2007 16:04 (eighteen years ago)
I got drunk with Foxx and his pussy posse about five years ago. He was (is?) in love with himself and basically, a prick.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Friday, 24 August 2007 16:07 (eighteen years ago)
I know, right? Its like they say they get fucked b/c they can't do anything but keep it real, and then they say that we just don't understand keepin' it real! Its like they're an entirely different culture or something!
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 24 August 2007 16:08 (eighteen years ago)
The previous message brought to you by the idiot Pasadena bitch housewife in training who was loudly drunk, within earshot of me, at a bar last night.
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 24 August 2007 16:09 (eighteen years ago)
I was confused for a second
― kenan, Friday, 24 August 2007 16:10 (eighteen years ago)
Oh yeah, its like THAT in the San Gabriel Valley, holmes.
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 24 August 2007 16:10 (eighteen years ago)
I honestly don't think that this is a race thing in any way, other than the guy in question happens to be black and it took place in Atlanta.
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 24 August 2007 16:14 (eighteen years ago)
*Leans against the bar, looks around to see if anyone is charging towards him for a fight*
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 24 August 2007 16:15 (eighteen years ago)
Suspended indefinitely
RICHMOND, Va. - The NFL indefinitely suspended Michael Vick without pay Friday just hours after he acknowledged in court papers that he did, indeed, bankroll gambling on dogfighting and helped kill some dogs not worthy of the pit.
Vick, however, insisted he placed no bets of his own nor took any winnings...
I love how this slides further & further down. "Okay, okay, so i knew the entire thing was going on and approved of it, paid for the shit and even might have killed a few dogs myself, but i never gambled! Take THAT, william bennett!"
― kingfish, Friday, 24 August 2007 22:13 (eighteen years ago)
"Lest anyone think I was doing this simply for profit," said Vick, "I want to be absolutely clear: it wasn't about the money. I really believe in electrocuting animals, you know? This was a labor of love, and it's reprehensible that anyone would claim otherwise."
― nabisco, Friday, 24 August 2007 22:19 (eighteen years ago)
Oh man, i'm really going to be pissed if this takes on more of the race-baiting/street-culture defense.
― kingfish, Friday, 24 August 2007 22:21 (eighteen years ago)
"These little scamps here are my friends," he added. "And when they come to me saying 'Please please please can we keep dogs and train them to be vicious and make them fight each other and gamble on it and then kill them if they're not good at it' ... I mean, look in their eyes. You'd have to have a heart of stone to say no to these little guys."
― nabisco, Friday, 24 August 2007 22:22 (eighteen years ago)
i posted that FUIUD pic first, kingfish!!! fuk u!
i thought it was a little crazy when pps got on portis' ass for saying what he did a while back, cuz it was true: football players are mostly a bunch of country motherfuckers, and dogfighting is some country ass shit (i know that's really unfair to the great majority of rural pps who have nothing to do w/it but otoh who cares)
― cankles, Saturday, 25 August 2007 04:27 (eighteen years ago)
don't yell at me, yell at hstencil.
dogfighting is some country ass shit
fuck yeah. I went to the local "west coast bully breeders show" last month just to see what was up, and it was way out in scary-ass Camas.
― kingfish, Saturday, 25 August 2007 04:29 (eighteen years ago)
oh dang sorry lol, wtf was i thinkin~
did any of u guys see the thing on REAL SPORTS (the bryant gumble show on hbo) abt dogfightin? it looks like some pretty uncool stuff!!!!
― cankles, Saturday, 25 August 2007 04:35 (eighteen years ago)
i posted that FUIUD pic first, kingfish!!! fuk u!this one's for cankles
learn to read you country ass motherfucker
― hstencil, Saturday, 25 August 2007 06:51 (eighteen years ago)
req beastiality slashfic re michael vick plz email me directly
― luriqua, Saturday, 25 August 2007 06:53 (eighteen years ago)
esp more violent stuff.
― luriqua, Saturday, 25 August 2007 06:54 (eighteen years ago)
The worst thing to me is Foxx trying to sneak in some race-based bullshit, like the Man is just fucking with black culture or something.]
It's a shame this didn't come out earlier or DMX could claim the controversy behind dogfighting videos was an attempt by the white man to get his videos taken off tv.
If you belonged to a race that used to be terrorized by dogs (pre-Civil Rights era no less) you might do what Michael Vick did too!*
*Seriously, what's up with stereotypes re: black Americans and dogs? I've met countless blacks who've had aversions to them (they are overrepresented amongst other people who have that problem, in my experience) and I know there's a stereotype that goes along with it.
― Cunga, Saturday, 25 August 2007 07:50 (eighteen years ago)
Fuck you again, DMX...
CAVE CREEK, Ariz. -- Sheriff's deputies acting on a tip of animal cruelty raided the Phoenix-area home of rapper-turned-actor DMX and carried out 12 pit bulls in need of immediate medical care, investigators said. They said they also found several dogs buried in the back yard of the Cave Creek property.
The Maricopa County sheriff's deputies said a tip came in more than a week ago about dogs being kept in inhumane conditions, said Sheriff Joe Arpaio.
Detectives went to the home and then called one of the rapper's lawyers, Arapio said. Investigators told him that the conditions for the dogs needed to be improved or deputies would obtain a search warrant, Arpaio said.
Authorities armed with a warrant returned to the home Friday and discovered a dozen dogs that were not being watered or fed. Arapio said.
A source told CBS 5 News that someone had recently been hired to take care of DMX's dogs while he is in New York. Neighbors said they haven't seen DMX for several months.
Investigators also found drug paraphernalia and a cache of weapons inside the home, according Arpaio. Arpaio said it does not appear dogfighting was involved, just abuse of dogs. Earl Simmons, 36, also known as DMX, was not at home when the raid occurred, according to deupties.
The animals were taken to the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office M.A.S.H. unit. The facility at the jail is no-kill animal shelter created to house and care for animals that have been abused or neglected by their caretakers and rescued by the Animal Cruelty Investigative Unit.
DMX has a history of law-enforcement run-ins. In 1999, during a "Hard Knock Life" tour stop in Denver, he was arrested and later cleared in the stabbing and shooting of his mother. In 2002, he pleaded guilty to animal cruelty for neglecting 13 pit bulls in his possession.
― kingkongvsgodzilla, Saturday, 25 August 2007 12:02 (eighteen years ago)
You kind of have to hand it to the prosecutors in this case. They were up against what I'm sure were some very high-paid lawyers and they wrapped everything up very quickly without a trial and with what seem like pretty stiff sentences. The federal court in Richmond is known for its speediness (and also, should be said, for being very conservative).
― Mark Rich@rdson, Saturday, 25 August 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)
To the surprise of no one, Vick claims to have found Jesus now...
I take full responsibility for my actions," Vick said. "Not for one second will I sit right here and point the finger and try to blame anybody else for my actions or what I've done."Through this situation I've found Jesus," he added. He vowed to redeem himself, saying, "I have to."
"Through this situation I've found Jesus," he added. He vowed to redeem himself, saying, "I have to."
― Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 00:15 (eighteen years ago)
If you ever can't find Jesus, look in the courthouse, pre-sentencing. He hangs out there a lot.
― nabisco, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 01:13 (eighteen years ago)
Which isn't to suggest that Vick is just saying that, or anything. I mean, I know when I was 9 years old, I tended to believe in Jesus way more when I was in trouble.
― nabisco, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 01:15 (eighteen years ago)
Micro-props to Vick. He has thousands of miles to go but he took a step in the right direction. Sure it was all coached and practiced, but it seems to be one of the first times he's chosen to take good advice.
I'll meet y'all back here in a year or so to see if he keeps it up.
― peepee, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 01:35 (eighteen years ago)
A little late, but:
Cunga, will you shut the fuck up?
― milo z, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 01:40 (eighteen years ago)
beat me to it
― Curt1s Stephens, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 01:45 (eighteen years ago)
i was surprised when i saw a clip of him, he sounded genuinely contrite in a way i didn't expect. his normal post-game press conferences always sound canned as hell so i figured this would be even worse. he's got a long way to go, but that was some pretty real sounding shit imo~~
(am i deluded?)
― cankles, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 01:51 (eighteen years ago)
Possibly deluded. Today just felt a lot to me like "I'm sorry I got caught. Kids, don't get caught."
― Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 01:57 (eighteen years ago)
freemichaelvick.com doesn't look like it was updated today, but about as crazy as other sites i've seen
― kingfish, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 02:02 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.vickdogchewtoy.com/
http://www.jimmyshowbiz.com/vickschewtoy2.jpg
The Official Vick's Dog Chew Toy
Is it different you ask? You bet it is! Vick's Dog Chew Toy is made of state of the art "dog" material. The Vick's Toy Doll is so strong and flexible, it will challenge every breed. Especially The Pit Bull.
Unlike other toys, our manufacturer is so sure of its durability they guarantee it against the most playful dog destruction. It Bends. It Bounces. It Flies. It Floats. And best of all, it lasts through the whole season and more!
Get Your Official Vick's Dog Chew Toy today!
― kingfish, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 02:04 (eighteen years ago)
It sounded real enough to possibly shave some time off of his sentence. But he'll make believers out of all of us how he lives his "new life".
As a teacher who works with many young people who aim for the thuglife, I don't think that any of my students would have seen any nudge-nudge-wink-wink in his speech.
― peepee, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 02:30 (eighteen years ago)
What about Raymond Pettibon? Never really saw any reaction to this when it ran:
http://www.believermag.com/issues/200412/?read=interview_pettibon
― Mark Rich@rdson, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 02:46 (eighteen years ago)
Pettibon being a cock is far less shocking than Michael Vick being one, really.
― milo z, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 02:48 (eighteen years ago)
i don't know about that. both of 'em being dicks isn't really shocking at all.
― hstencil, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 03:08 (eighteen years ago)
Okay, I just watched his statement again on ESPN and I retract my last post. There seemed to be some real introspection and humility there. I'm still suspicious of him playing the jesus card, but there was an instant there when he said "I'm going to have a lot of downtime in the next year or so" when it looked like he suddenly realized the truth of what he was saying. Don't know how much slack it'll get him from Hudson, but it was a good public apology.
― Rock Hardy, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 03:23 (eighteen years ago)
Dude had dogs fight and kill each other for his amusement. Fuck him.
― forksclovetofu, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 05:12 (eighteen years ago)
They just had a report about this on Irish radio. The correspondent, who lives in the U.S., reminded people at the end of the piece that this story has stirred up particular controversy in the U.S. because people really love their pets. They have health insurance for them and pet psychiatrists and everything! This was a source of much hilarity to the presenters. Fucking dicks.
― accentmonkey, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 06:59 (eighteen years ago)
My friends have had to take their pug to the emergency pet hospital. Pug insurance is a useful thing. Fuck these people.
― kingfish, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 07:29 (eighteen years ago)
I thought his press conference/statement was utter unbelievable horseshit. Once again, he avoids personal responsibility by blaming immaturity (much like he blamed his cousin initially). Fuck him
― Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 28 August 2007 08:07 (eighteen years ago)
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=hill/070827
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Tuesday, 28 August 2007 15:36 (eighteen years ago)
Our very own version:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/6969651.stm
― accentmonkey, Friday, 31 August 2007 07:48 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/10/01/vick.dogs/index.html
two bits:
1. Dogs will be sent to families or doggy sanctuary. One dog is too far gone and will be put to sleep.
2. Dude tested positive for marijuana in the midst of all this
― kingfish, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 06:34 (eighteen years ago)
Second Draft (2.5mb pdf)
Atlanta Magazine revises its four year old gushing profile of Vick in light of the current situation.
― G00blar, Friday, 2 November 2007 19:12 (eighteen years ago)
Five Falcons fined for wearing Vick tributes
― Kerm, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 03:05 (eighteen years ago)
That's whay I laugh when the Falcons lose (and I've been laughing plenty this season)
― If Assholes Could Fly This Place Would Be An Airport, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:07 (eighteen years ago)
oh the comments section:
evodz wrote: Bunch of Keyboard Cowboys (KC's) who don't have the guts to speak their racist views in the face of "any" minority. The same type to throw stones and hide their hands. Heck, these KC's are bigots unto their own. Pettiful souls.
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:09 (eighteen years ago)
BearkatModelLawyer wrote: I second Diamante. I'm young and black people always assume either that I'm a half wit or some type of criminal. That is, until I open my mouth. I'm more eloquent than most white, middle class 40 year olds (white middle class 40 year olds have told me this). I attended a college preparatory boarding school, I'm consistently on my university's Dean's List, and I look neat and tidy every day in my Top Siders and Abercrombie wardrobe. Nothing is more offensive or ignorant than pre-judging an individual solely upon the basis of the color of their dermal pigmentation. Skin Color is nothing- Content of individual's (not an entire race's) character is.
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:10 (eighteen years ago)
singerlink wrote: Mr.Vick apologized in a repenting manner,this is good enough for our LORD and GOD,but not good enough for the dog owners or neighbors........The LORD JESUS turned to the Scribes,asked,"what is the greatest commandment"?Scribes answered,"hear ye O Israel,the lord is one,you should worship HIM with all thy heart,soul and might"........JESUS answered"well said,there is another as great"love thy neighbor as thy love thy self"......... I thought JESUS took our sins upon HIMSELF,fotever,that includs mine,yours and Mr.Vick's.In closing he who is without sin cast the first stone..AMEN!
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:12 (eighteen years ago)
I fear for the future of civilization after reading those comments.
How dumb are those Falcons anyway? That organization is fucked. There trying to make Vick out to be some kind of martyr? How fucking stupid can you get.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)
Also, D'Angelo Hall should concentrate on football and shut the fuck up. His new nickname should be "Toast".
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)
so i had a big discussion w/ some of my students - students i think most people would label "jocks" or "thugs" - about this during break time the other day.
most of them were totally disgusted by vick.
a few of them made the case that vick isn't any more guilty than the owner of a slaughterhouse. sure, he was torturing and killing dogs, but so do chicken farmers and veal farmers. they doubted that vick was motivated by amusement - they figured he was motivated by profit.
i argued that killing animals is motivated by necessity. they said people could live off soybeans + lentils, but that killing cows and chickens was a
i tried to bring up the fact that motivation isn't everything. wanting to make money might motivate someone to be a teacher or a drug dealer, but there's no way the two things are equal. they said i was making a spurious comparison, and that to make it fair, i'd have to compare two types of drug dealers: one that works in social norms, and one that works outside social norms. they said i might be a school psychologist prescribing ritalin for profit, or a dude on the street selling crack. then it would match the vick/farmer situation more closely.
all in all, quite cynical for 16 year olds!! mind you, this was like 3 out of 12 kids and the others were strongly anti-vick. still, i had trouble dismissing their arguments out of hand.
ps i blame this on gangster rap
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:44 (eighteen years ago)
the bit that got cut off = "killing cows and chickens was within our social norms"
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:45 (eighteen years ago)
Look, I WHOLLY subscribe to the concept that everyone is due forgiveness, regardless of their wrongs.
HOWEVER
A whole lot of Christians (all of 'em - Baps, Presbys, Catholics, Lutes, etc.) take this to mean that once they've said they're sorry, they shouldn't be punished at all or looked upon as a man redeemed.
FUCK THAT.
Should a man who raped and murdered multiple women or stole millions upon millions of other people's money or mismanaged a company or organization so as to gain personally while driving that thing into the ground be forgiven because of a simple "mea culpa"? NO. You must atone for your wrongs.
And, in a society like ours, being put in jail or suffering other punishments, and thereby serving as a detriment to others who might consider perpetrating other, similar crimes, is one form of atonement.
Michael Vick systematically and over the course of YEARS raised, trained and killed dogs for the purpose of a blood sport. You may not be a dog owner, and therefore not as prone to feeling as strongly about this as I do, but that man didn't make a mistake. He committed many, many wrongs. Should he be forgiven? Sure. Who am I to judge when that will happen, if at all? But do I have to take him as the same guy he was BEFORE all of these things came to light and were subsequently admitted to, just because he said "I'm sorry"?
Nope.
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:45 (eighteen years ago)
Detriment should read deterrent .
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:46 (eighteen years ago)
And anyone who blames this on the system needs to understand this fundamental, and wholly-informed-by-religion, aspect of the American justice system:
The American Justice system does not reach justice. Only God can do this. But, as we are a society that is made of humans and not directly informed as to the opinions of God on our day-to-day activities, we have the justice system in place to reach the best approximation of justice that we can.
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)
I'm feeling a little Old Testamentish today. Sorry if I'm preachin'.
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:50 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.commonsensefarm.com/images/Ingredient_sub/500soapbox-pic.jpg
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:51 (eighteen years ago)
Admitted. Totally admitted.
Only I don't have boots like those.
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:52 (eighteen years ago)
Isn't some brave soul going to defend dog fighting as a vital aspect of inner city African-American culture?
― dally, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:52 (eighteen years ago)
nope, not trolling at all
― gershy, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:54 (eighteen years ago)
xpost here you go dally^^^^http://www.mojito.ch/images/upload/cherry_garcia.gif
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:54 (eighteen years ago)
Wait, you mean like Newports, chrome rims on SUVs, drug dealing, un-wed mothers or fried chicken?
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 17:55 (eighteen years ago)
quite cynical for 16 year olds!!
If I had gone through early adolescence and driver's ed during this bush administration and 9/11 etc. I'd be really suspect of adult ethics as well!
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:02 (eighteen years ago)
16 y/o was peak cynicism 4 me
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:16 (eighteen years ago)
those kids are pretty much right tho
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:18 (eighteen years ago)
vahid's students basically otm
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:19 (eighteen years ago)
Which ones, the 3 cynical ones or the 9 who think Vick's a pig? I'm going with the latter.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:29 (eighteen years ago)
go fuck a whore
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:30 (eighteen years ago)
vahid's students essentially *off* the money because they know what a social norm is without really examining it
the argument "oh, it's just a social norm" isn't a very strong argument. yes, they wear throwback jerseys to class and i wear a shirt + tie, and that's a case of different social norms, but that doesn't mean that the gap between killing fighting dogs and killing cows for leather couches or purses is the same as the gap between throwback jerseys vs shirt + tie
just because some social norms are arbitrary, or appear arbitrary, doesn't mean that social norms actually *are* arbitrary!
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:31 (eighteen years ago)
"go fuck a whore"
Your mother free today?
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:31 (eighteen years ago)
that should say "all social norms"
gentlemen, please, you're transgressing nrms of civilized behavior
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:32 (eighteen years ago)
I get insulted because I think a guy who tortured, maimed and killed dogs for profit should serve his jail sentence. Nice work.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:33 (eighteen years ago)
t/s fighting dogs vs fighting dawgs
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)
so vahid your argument isnt that killing dogs is worse than killing cows, its that the way in which the dogs were killed (or the reasons for the killing)?
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)
"the reasons for the killing" is what i tried out w/ the kids but they weren't buying it!
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:35 (eighteen years ago)
I have to admit that's a decent question, in light of the big industrial slaughterhouses' treatment of their animals.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:35 (eighteen years ago)
i dont have a lot sympathy for the "cows are dumb and therefore deserve to be killed/dogs are smart and we shouldnt kill them" argument
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:37 (eighteen years ago)
not that anyone here was making that argument obviously
i mean, i find the whole "fighting dogs" thing repulsive on a base, instinctive level, but i don't think that means i can just dismiss it out of hand as a "mere" social norm
the other side of that is my feeling that just because an ethical argument is *logical* doesn't mean it's actually ethical ... it might be the best position from which to argue but not necessarily the best position to hold.
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:37 (eighteen years ago)
well i have no idea what your point abt throwbacks and ties is there but its absurd to sentence a man to two years in jail for killing animals in a country where millions of animals are killed legally every year. probably most of the dogs that were seized from him will be killed by the state.
not saying that theres no difference between a dog fighting ring and a slaughterhouse. but the punishment is just ridiculous - its based on the deluded belief that dogs and cats are at least half human - give the guy a fine and move on.
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:38 (eighteen years ago)
i was trying to argue that killing for food + shelter is better than killing for entertainment, to which the kids replied that there wasn't any evidence vick was actually *entertained* by killing dogs - he was doing it for the same reasons.
should we prosecute racehorse owners who push their horses to the point where they break legs and get shot on the track?
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:39 (eighteen years ago)
yah dog racers kill those lil dudes wholesale trying to breed one that can run fast enough
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)
Entirely true.
And, if we take out of the equation the whole concept that man has dominion over the earth and its creatures, don't slaughterhouses and dogfighting get a whole lot closer to each other? There is no one who has spent any time around cows that can't say that they aren't intelligent beings with personalities. Why should the widespread breeding and killing of them be any better than that of dogs?
It has to do with the utility that their killing represents. And dog fighting serves no utility, other than for sport. Which can be had elsewhere.
The kids make a good argument. I'll give them that. One that deserves to be explored and teased out in a learning way - something we used to call "a teachable moment."
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:43 (eighteen years ago)
its pretty tarded too that profit is judged a morally superior motivation than enjoyment
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:44 (eighteen years ago)
its pretty tarded too that profit is judged a morally superior motivation than enjoyment.
Not at all - its all about greater utility adding to the entirety from which all can draw, as opposed to consuming and discarding that which could be better used.
And I would argue that a dog could be MUCH better used as a pet than as a gladiator, if only from a longevity standpoint. And don't come with the "pit bulls aren't suitable pets" bullshit. I have numerous examples in my neighborhood to the contrary.
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:48 (eighteen years ago)
j.s. mill sucks
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:48 (eighteen years ago)
Deontological ethics or deontology (Greek: δέον (deon) meaning 'obligation' or 'duty') is an approach to ethics that focuses on the rightness or wrongness of actions themselves, as opposed to the rightness or wrongness of the consequences of those actions.
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:52 (eighteen years ago)
Consequentialism refers to those moral theories which hold that the consequences of a particular action form the basis for any valid moral judgment about that action. Thus, on a consequentialist account, a morally right action is an action that produces good consequences.
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:53 (eighteen years ago)
But is it possible to have a deontological defense of an action that you KNOW the wrong consequence of?
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 18:56 (eighteen years ago)
michael vick you have been sentenced to two years in prison because your form of animal cruelty doesnt contribute enough to society.
not to mention breeding animals to eat is the least utilitarian thing in the world - consumes like 1mx the resources than growing food.
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:02 (eighteen years ago)
^ hyperbole
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:03 (eighteen years ago)
jhø i think youre forgetting that puppies are very cute and sometimes we even give them human names
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:03 (eighteen years ago)
we need jessie monster's opinion on this
― Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:05 (eighteen years ago)
NO ITS TRUE IT CONSUMES LIKE 1MX THE RESOURCES
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:05 (eighteen years ago)
yeah it sure is expensive having to deal with all those cows and chickens after they've been killed and eaten
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:09 (eighteen years ago)
If by "enough," you mean "at all," than yes, I agree.
breeding animals to eat is the least utilitarian thing in the world - consumes like 1mx the resources than growing food
This is an entirely fair point, but at least there is SOME utility thereto. Breeding dogs for the purpose of them killing or maiming each other, not to mention the ones that are bred and summarily killed prior to ever fighting because they don't meet certain criteria, serves NO utility at all.
Well, I guess you could make the argument that, in some circles, dog fighting is just like any other recreational competition, from basketball to poker. In that sense, it does have some utility - it creates social interaction, it allows for enjoyment by those involved, and it can turn a profit for those who are more-than-recreationally involved therein.
The problem is that we as a society have deemed dog fighting to be undesirable, and therefore illegal, and being involved in the enterprise of dog fighting, and gambling thereon, is also therefore illegal.
From the utility standpoint, kiddie pron provides enjoyment to others, and is thereby somewhat defensable. But, like dog fighting, its been deemed undesirable, and is therefore forbidden.
So, yes, I did just make the analogy that kiddie pron = dog fighting.
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:10 (eighteen years ago)
they found a cow cruelty place right around here one time, it took thousands of people, some paying hundreds of dollars, to clean it up
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:10 (eighteen years ago)
the cows were a real risk, if they had gotten out of their pens, the way they had been trained, they could have killed people
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:11 (eighteen years ago)
"1mx" should be adopted as the standard rule of measure for everything.
― dan m, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:11 (eighteen years ago)
since cows are often bred for companionship and are sometimes quite intelligent, it was difficult to eat them
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:12 (eighteen years ago)
what does horse meat taste like?
― gershy, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:13 (eighteen years ago)
Executive Producer Upton Sinclair presents
Killer Cows: Escape from The Jungle
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:13 (eighteen years ago)
everything illegal = kiddie porn
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:14 (eighteen years ago)
Hmm. Using the language of my post, yes.
I see your point, and it is well-made.
Nevertheless, the question of dog fighting will never be resolved in favor of dogs fighting in this country. Ever.
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:18 (eighteen years ago)
tombot, blam: go fuck whores
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:18 (eighteen years ago)
the mechanism for dealing with raising cows and other animals for food is already institutionalized in our society
the mechanism for dealing with raising dogs for sport is not - it is an exceptional circumstance and a costly hazard
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:18 (eighteen years ago)
jhøshea, eat shit
fuck whores 1mx
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:19 (eighteen years ago)
1motocross
― dan m, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:20 (eighteen years ago)
hey guys speaking of motorcross who wants to see a picture of evil kinevel
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 19:21 (eighteen years ago)
I think a society can make a value judgment between feeding people on the one hand and training dogs to fight and kill each other for gambling purposes on the other. I only agreed with the point above that treatment of the animals in the slaghterhouse is inhumane prior to slaughter. I hope Vick has a hellish two years in prison.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:28 (eighteen years ago)
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:31 (eighteen years ago)
I guess I better go fuck one too, 'cause I hope the same.
― Rock Hardy, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:35 (eighteen years ago)
I'm still waiting for your mother to call me back, I guess she's busy with other customers.
xpost of course
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:35 (eighteen years ago)
wishing someone a hellish time is pretty repulsive behavior
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:37 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, I feel bad about it. I need your moral guidance.
― Rock Hardy, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:38 (eighteen years ago)
BTW EVERYONE GO FUCK A WHORE IS AN ILX APPROVED LAZY ZING FOR BILL MAGILL SO U CAN ALL GO FUCK WHORES
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)
Whore fucker.
― milo z, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)
the whore store called
― gershy, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:43 (eighteen years ago)
"BTW EVERYONE GO FUCK A WHORE IS AN ILX APPROVED LAZY ZING FOR BILL MAGILL SO U CAN ALL GO FUCK WHORES"
Mature stuff, dude. "Lazy zing" is kind of an understatement.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:43 (eighteen years ago)
srsly tho the moral grandstanding and self-righteous aggression over this bullshit is pretty gross
i know u all luv lil doggies but shiiiit
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:44 (eighteen years ago)
They call a dog "man's best friend." Not his wife or his children. Dogs give unconditional love and affection to people in a world where such things can be found in few if any other places. Neither wives nor children, no matter how much they try, do that.
It was a short step for any dog owner to go from those dogs to their own dogs.
And then and even shorter step to imagine, however quickly and involuntarily, those harms being visited on any dogs they've had in the past.
So, when Michael Vick was linked to an operation that did any number of cruel and deadly things to dogs in a systematic way, it was no large series of jumps for people to apply their feelings for their dogs to those dogs Michael Vick had.
Deluded? No. Emotionally driven, and therefore probably less-than-totally-logical? Probably.
But, as I own a dog, fuck Michael Vick. Guy's a fuckin asshole.
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:44 (eighteen years ago)
Like moral grandstanding about soliciting prostitutes. I'm sure call-girls all over the world are grateful to you for standing up for them.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:45 (eighteen years ago)
Comparing dog-fighting to soliciting prostitutes? shiiiit
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:46 (eighteen years ago)
calling his mom a whore in response, however, is a sure path to the high ground, eh Bill?
regardless of how I feel on the issue of Vick, i concur that you should probably go fuck a whore.
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:48 (eighteen years ago)
what if the prostitutes were dogs???
― gershy, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)
Hey man, I didn't bring up the whore thing, he did, not my problem. I was just posting on the topic until it got sidetracked like that. No regrets here.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)
boom! I fucked your whore
― milo z, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)
i like dogs, i had a couple as a kid. do i think people's weirdo anthropomorphic projections should should result in a man's incarceration? no.
as for bill magill: i wasnt comparing anything, i was just suggesting that maybe you should go fuck a whore, as is yr want.
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)
I will, you paying? How the hell do you know what my "want" is, you don't even know me. Do you really care about what I posted on a thread on that topic a few months ago about something I did about twelve years ago in a place where it happens to be legal? I guess i'm flattered, because I don't give a flying fuck about anything you do.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:55 (eighteen years ago)
http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:ndzli4x1TWW4RM:http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b82/DJHexa/potblack.jpg
― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:55 (eighteen years ago)
dont u see what youve made me do - next ill be fucking whores w/bill magill
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:58 (eighteen years ago)
oh shit I wish I had remembered "go fuck a whore"
― dan m, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:58 (eighteen years ago)
I don't know if you want a prostitute to be your first time, chief. She might hurt you.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 20:59 (eighteen years ago)
I'm done on this thread. You guys have fun obsessing over my sex life. Maybe someday you'll have one yourself.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:00 (eighteen years ago)
great job everyone
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:03 (eighteen years ago)
I'm off the prostitutes because of you!
― gershy, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:03 (eighteen years ago)
sorry bill - srsly i dont care if you fuck whores or not - its just a fun thing to say to someone who disagrees w/u
however i do think itd be wise to get a new login and never ever reveal anything abt yr personal life on ilx ever again
like arent you a republican too?
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:10 (eighteen years ago)
Go check a post I put on the Presidential Candidate thread this morning, that should answer your question. I would have thought you would have known that, since you seem to be obsessed with me.
Do you think you could ever get me to change my screen name? I don't need your stupid advice. I doubt if we met you would have the courage to get in my face you fuck. Nice courage in the safety of the bedroom of your mommy's house. I guarantee you would not find it "fun" to say shit like that to my face.
Nice way to ruin a thread, you dick. Merry Christmas
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:19 (eighteen years ago)
how dare joshea ruin a dogfighting thread with his talk of whores!
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:20 (eighteen years ago)
no see i was just joooking bill jeez
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:20 (eighteen years ago)
bill magill doesnt joke
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:21 (eighteen years ago)
he just beats the shit out of dudes
ts: michael vick vs. being a trick
― gershy, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:21 (eighteen years ago)
Bill, change your name to "e-thug" plz.
― dan m, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:21 (eighteen years ago)
Even though I can't stand Oprah, and am annoyed by Burns, if I could vote for anybody in this race right now it would be Obama.
-- Bill Magill, Wednesday, December 19, 2007 10:22 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Link
i am officially a bill magill stalker now
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)
that doesnt make it clear whether or not hes a republican
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:23 (eighteen years ago)
Obama: Soft on Prostitution
― gershy, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:23 (eighteen years ago)
Enjoy that.
x post.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:24 (eighteen years ago)
WTF @ thread
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:25 (eighteen years ago)
bill is like the hardman version of louis in "just keeps asking for it" department
― max, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:25 (eighteen years ago)
i still think he might be a republican
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:28 (eighteen years ago)
people people why are we fighting
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:30 (eighteen years ago)
just for fun
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:32 (eighteen years ago)
plz dont incarcerate me
God are you an annoying little putz
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:33 (eighteen years ago)
-- Bill Magill, Wednesday, December 19, 2007 4:00 PM (32 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:33 (eighteen years ago)
ts: zing syndrome vs. last word syndrome
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:34 (eighteen years ago)
zings win obv duh
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:36 (eighteen years ago)
is bill magill relation to magilla magilla gorilla
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:36 (eighteen years ago)
uh i mean stfu u gay
one or the other will be ILX's downfall.
xxxpost
― will, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:36 (eighteen years ago)
1. Bill, please stop taking jhosh'z bait, he's clearly not aware that somebody might actually get angry from being told to go fuck a whore.
2. jhoshea, please stop baiting Bill.
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:37 (eighteen years ago)
but i caaaaant
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:38 (eighteen years ago)
(even if more often than not it seems to be its raison d'etre)
― will, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:38 (eighteen years ago)
but aaaaanyway. Fine the dude. Community service, PSA's, whatever. 2 years?? seems excessive.
― will, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:40 (eighteen years ago)
just be cool down in front ... don't push around ...
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:40 (eighteen years ago)
brothers and sisters, come on now, will you cool out??
everybody be cool now come on.
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:41 (eighteen years ago)
settle down the dog fighting is abt to commence
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:42 (eighteen years ago)
mandatory periodic psychiatric evaluations, maybe.
― will, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:42 (eighteen years ago)
I think a big part of the 2 years was that the judge and the DA were pretty unhappy with Vick perjuring himself on the first go-round or whatever
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:47 (eighteen years ago)
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/michael_mccann/12/10/vick/index.html
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:51 (eighteen years ago)
it's a shame you can't get the article in the SI print edition on Vick and other athletes' troubles stemming from "ghetto loyalty" as a phenomenon; it was really thoughtful and actually made you feel a bit sorry for the dude in the end (of course, it's SI)
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:53 (eighteen years ago)
RIP lil kim
― moonship journey to baja, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:56 (eighteen years ago)
do white people just turn their best friends, though? is there no loyalty in the burbs?
i feel sorry for dude he got shafted - of course our justice system brutalizes less rich and famous guys way worse everyday - but still
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:56 (eighteen years ago)
That was a good article, Tom. Baron Davis seemed to be the voice of reason in that article, if I remember correctly.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:58 (eighteen years ago)
yeah but baron davis is a total chucker
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 21:58 (eighteen years ago)
What the hell does that mean? An inaccurrate shooter? Who cares?
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:06 (eighteen years ago)
the duke lacrosse rape was thrown out, so they had to scratch the "burbs loyalty" story
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:07 (eighteen years ago)
hes so talented theres no reason to be taking contested threes off the dribble early in the shot clock. although he has reined it in a bit over the past year or so.
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:09 (eighteen years ago)
The move to GS has resuscitated a career that was headed seriously south.
― Bill Magill, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:10 (eighteen years ago)
"how does he have the courage to take those shots?"
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 19 December 2007 22:27 (eighteen years ago)
― Bo Jackson Overdrive, Thursday, 20 December 2007 04:09 (eighteen years ago)
jhosea ruined this thread!
― Bo Jackson Overdrive, Thursday, 20 December 2007 12:58 (eighteen years ago)
― max, Thursday, 20 December 2007 17:52 (eighteen years ago)
Alright, so apparently cockfighting is part of Dominican culture, and therefore Juan Marichal and Pedro Martinez should get a pass for attending a cock fight.
I think this is quite different from the Michael Vick situation, but still pretty abhorrent. Thoughts?
For the actual video, go here. It is a little graphic.
― B.L.A.M., Friday, 8 February 2008 20:25 (eighteen years ago)
Only Koreans eat dogs
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Friday, 8 February 2008 20:26 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.badrap.org/rescue/vick/now.html
― Oilyrags, Saturday, 29 March 2008 20:53 (seventeen years ago)
Bill, please stop taking jhosh'z bait, he's clearly not aware that somebody might actually get angry from being told to go fuck a whore
hahahaha
― gershy, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 03:16 (seventeen years ago)
SURRY, Va. -- Former NFL quarterback Michael Vick plans to plead guilty to state dogfighting charges, a step that could allow him to qualify for an early release from federal prison and into a halfway house, court papers show.
In a motion filed Oct. 15 in Surry County Circuit Court, Vick's attorneys asked to have him enter his plea by video teleconference. A hearing on the motion is scheduled for Oct. 30, Surry County Circuit Court administrator Sally Neblett said Tuesday.
The court papers note that allowing Vick to appear on two-way video would save the government the considerable expense of transporting him from prison in Leavenworth, Kan., to Surry County. His guilty plea would also allow him to pursue a halfway house program.
Under federal rules, Vick is ineligible to be released to a Residential Re-entry Center in the federal system until any pending charges against him are resolved.
In a statement, Vick attorneys Billy Martin and Lawrence Woodward said their client "is committed to taking responsibility for his actions. He is hopeful that, through this motion, the trial court will allow him to finally resolve these matters and put the charges behind him so that he can begin to focus on his future and to prepare to be reunited with his family."
The plea deal, if approved, also would satisfy the county's need to hold him accountable for the grisly crimes he bankrolled and participated in at a rural house he owned there.
"I'm not trying to make him suffer," Commonwealth's Attorney Gerald Poindexter said in a telephone interview. "I'm just trying to make him account for what he's done."
Vick pleaded guilty to federal conspiracy charges tied to the dogfighting operation last summer and is serving a 23-month term. Three convicted co-defendants also face local charges. The U.S. Bureau of Prisons lists Vick's projected release date as July 20, 2009.
Vick will have three years of federal probation upon his release from prison, and the deal offered by Poindexter would tack on an unspecified jail sentence, which would be suspended, and an additional year of probation in the county, he said.
Poindexter said he's not sure how quickly the judge would rule on the motion.
If permitted by a judge, Vick's video participation in the plea hearing would not be the first time he has participated electronically. Prison officials in Kansas have allowed the former Atlanta Falcons star to listen via telephone line to each of his several bankruptcy hearings in recent months.
Copyright 2008 by The Associated Press
― velko, Wednesday, 22 October 2008 16:42 (seventeen years ago)
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/magazine/12/22/vick.dogs/index.html
― TOMBOT, Tuesday, 30 December 2008 06:59 (seventeen years ago)
this seems like it was a lot longer ago than just 18 months or so
― "made smashable" (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 30 December 2008 07:08 (seventeen years ago)
house for salehttp://alt.coxnewsweb.com/cnishared/tools/shared/mediahub/05/05/74/bigbox_hood_974055_splurgevick.0302_HS15.JPG
― born_stuntin (rent), Thursday, 5 March 2009 01:30 (seventeen years ago)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2305/2190715438_d12a5f026e.jpg
― jenniburt staniston (Curt1s Stephens), Thursday, 5 March 2009 01:33 (seventeen years ago)
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=ap-vickbankruptcy&prov=ap&type=lgns
Lede of the story is that dude will work construction when he gets out of the clink, but article mostly about the details of his release.
Still, he'll work this job for 90 days at the most before some much bigger gig, but there you go.
― kingfish, Thursday, 2 April 2009 22:24 (sixteen years ago)
The road back to the NFL: How does Michael Vick get there?http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nfl/2009-05-28-michael-vick-cover_N.htm
― velko, Friday, 29 May 2009 17:24 (sixteen years ago)
to the road?
― nabisco, Friday, 29 May 2009 17:33 (sixteen years ago)
Fuck this guy. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home.― B.L.A.M., Wednesday, 18 July 2007 16:05 (1 year ago)
Said it, still mean it. Fuck this guy. I hope he's broke and pathetic for the rest of his life.
― Two Will Get You Three (B.L.A.M.), Friday, 29 May 2009 18:24 (sixteen years ago)
Conditionally reinstated.
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 27 July 2009 21:13 (sixteen years ago)
condition #1: do not encourage dogs to tear the living shit out of each other
― crutal truth (Curt1s Stephens), Monday, 27 July 2009 21:15 (sixteen years ago)
the lead story on my local news yesterday was the police raiding a CANARY FIGHTING RING
― johnny crunch, Monday, 27 July 2009 21:17 (sixteen years ago)
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahahaha
― EVERYWHERE YOU LOOK THERE'S SOME DIFFERENT SHIT POPPIN OFF (latebloomer), Monday, 27 July 2009 21:59 (sixteen years ago)
tweety noooooooooo
Yeah, he's a low-life. He was also a shitty quarterback.
― SourPatchCorpse, Monday, 27 July 2009 22:05 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.upi.com/Odd_News/2009/07/27/Police-bust-canary-fighting-ring/UPI-60621248725865/
wau
― Four-TEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEN! (HI DERE), Monday, 27 July 2009 22:06 (sixteen years ago)
canaries should be outlawed, they are bred to kill
― velko, Monday, 27 July 2009 22:14 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.thesuperest.com/heroes/k76_mff_canary.jpg
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 27 July 2009 22:16 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.dollgenie.com/2008/2008-Black-Canary.jpg
― velko, Monday, 27 July 2009 22:19 (sixteen years ago)
Unless you're a vegetarian, or better a vegan, then you really have no moral leg to stand on when denouncing Vick. What is done to cows and pigs, also mammals, is far more brutal than what Vick did to dogs. There are several slaughterhouse fortunes, backed by corporate wealth. How much big money do dog fighting promoters make?
...And what's truly hilarious are those Philadelphia Eagles fans who decried Vick's signing. Eagles fans are among the most abusive and violent in the NFL (no small feat). The amount of pig flesh they cram down their throats before and during games keeps abattoir torture functional and profitable.
http://dennisperrin.blogspot.com/2009/08/pick-your-vick.html
― Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 02:41 (sixteen years ago)
i mean this is right, but it's also wrong. i'm not convinced that running a dogfighting ring is the exact moral equivalent of eating meat. wtf does this guy know about eagles fans anyway beyond what the internet tells him?
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 02:45 (sixteen years ago)
dennis perrin sure has a lot of opinions
― velko, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 02:46 (sixteen years ago)
American Fan: Sports Mania and the Culture That Feeds It by Dennis Perrin (Hardcover - Jan 2000)30 Used & new from $0.32
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 02:50 (sixteen years ago)
he sure is a dumbass
― a narwhal done gored my sister nell (cankles), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 02:52 (sixteen years ago)
I wrote jokes for Bill Maher
Fuck Dennis Perrin. I am trading him off of my team in Madden as soon as I get home.
― Mariela Ure (jeff), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 03:18 (sixteen years ago)
That guy is NOT great in the new version of the Madden at all. Totally dropped off in the stats.
― Adventures of Dog Boy and Frank Sobotka (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 03:44 (sixteen years ago)
Dennis Perrin forgets that comparing two wrongs and declaring one of them to be the greater wrong does not make the other one right. Plus he is an asshole.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 03:49 (sixteen years ago)
Fuck Dennis Perrin. I hope he suffers a debilitating injury and fucking dies.
(Jk, guys. Eagles guys bring the <3, I promise.)
― Mordy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 03:50 (sixteen years ago)
Luckily for Morbz and Dennis Perrin I AM a vegetarian. ANd I suppose if Oscar Meyer or Frank Purdue played for the NFL I might support banning them, too.
― Id rather dig ditches than pull another dudes string (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 10:48 (sixteen years ago)
i am a vegetarian and fuck this guy.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 10:59 (sixteen years ago)
In what whacked out universe are dogs not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>pigs n cows anyway?
― Fetchboy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 11:15 (sixteen years ago)
Pigs are smarter and more interesting than dogs.
― EZ Snappin, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 11:19 (sixteen years ago)
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), woensdag 19 augustus 2009 10:59 (1 hour ago) Bookmark
^^ Co-sign
― young depardieu looming out of void in hour of profound triumph (Le Bateau Ivre), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 12:05 (sixteen years ago)
Pigs are better tasting than dogs.
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 12:14 (sixteen years ago)
I would bet that as a whole, Eagles fans have a much higher per capita rate of scrapple consumption than any other NFL team's fans, so there is that.
― she is writing about love (Jenny), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 12:22 (sixteen years ago)
btw alec baldwin is saying basically the same thing as perrin:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alec-baldwin/michael-vick-black-sheep_b_260990.html
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 12:55 (sixteen years ago)
well, kind of a nicer version of the same thing, basically saying we should examine our own standards of how we treat animals before condemning vick
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 12:57 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, Perrin certainly didn't address that, eh?
I'm sure none of you made it to the moneyshot at the end (you know, dogs vs Afghan children).
― Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:09 (sixteen years ago)
― EZ Snappin, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 11:19 (1 hour ago)
Srsly? More intersting than this?http://blogfiles.wfmu.org/KF/2009/07/01/dog_fire_jump.gif
― Fetchboy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:20 (sixteen years ago)
"I'm sure none of you made it to the moneyshot at the end (you know, dogs vs Afghan children)."
I saw Dennis Perrin wrote it and you linked to it and then I ignored it.
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:21 (sixteen years ago)
morbs i admire your restraint for not c/p'ing the nonsensical obama/vick parallels he tries.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:23 (sixteen years ago)
uh, who's that? I don't know who that is.
― Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:28 (sixteen years ago)
Fetchboy, that gif sort of proves that pigs are smarter than dogs imo.
― Peinlich Manoeuvre (NickB), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:41 (sixteen years ago)
also, Alex -- don't address me in your posts anymore, please.
― Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:42 (sixteen years ago)
smarter /= awesomer
― Fetchboy, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:44 (sixteen years ago)
Dog's on some canine Jackass trip. It'll end in scorched nads and a hangover I bet.
Dunno who Perrin is. I don't have a major problem with what he's saying about our inconsistency when it comes to our concern for animals, but he could have said it in a bit less of a trollish way. Can't vouch for the Obama stuff though.
― Peinlich Manoeuvre (NickB), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:55 (sixteen years ago)
Dennis Perrin can't do anything in a less troll-ish way.
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:18 (sixteen years ago)
Seriously not going to read his piece, but if his point is human beings care more about dogs, an animal which has been domesticated as a pet for nigh on 15,000 years, than they do about animals which they been killing/eating for at least as long then that's not exactly a contradiction of epic proportions here.
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)
He's commenting that it's a moral contradiction rather than a cultural one.
― Peinlich Manoeuvre (NickB), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:54 (sixteen years ago)
Only if you equate eating meat as being morally equivalent to forcing dogs to fight each other and then killing them. Which most people don't thus it's not really much of a contradiction.
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:59 (sixteen years ago)
this "dennis perrin" seems like a sad and miserable person.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:06 (sixteen years ago)
It's the meat industry's torture of animals that is the point of comparison.
(I am a shameless carnivore so this is all theoretical for me)
― Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)
"It's the meat industry's torture of animals that is the point of comparison."
But all meat is pretty inevitably going to come from what can really only be described as the torture of animals. And he's most talking (in the section quoted above) about the eaters' complicity in that which apparently makes us too "morally compromised" to be outraged about what Michael Vick does or whatever.
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:25 (sixteen years ago)
whatever it is it's missing the real point which is that no one apparently believes in paying yr debt to society and being allowed a second chance anymore.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)
Exactly. Animal rights groups are always going to have a hard time getting past the meat = sustenance equation most of us carnivores hold as true.
― Adventures of Dog Boy and Frank Sobotka (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:28 (sixteen years ago)
"whatever it is it's missing the real point which is that no one apparently believes in paying yr debt to society and being allowed a second chance anymore."
When did people ever believe that?
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:31 (sixteen years ago)
There are all kinds of permanent consequences after paying one's debt to society, though. My wife's stepfather served a few years in prison on felony drug charges when he was in his twenties. (Some 30 years ago.) He's been clean ever since. But as a result, he can never be bonded, nor can he be licensed in his chosen field of architecture. Nor, come to think of it, can he own a handgun.
― Id rather dig ditches than pull another dudes string (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:35 (sixteen years ago)
when white people got arrested
― dude, it's america, it happens all the time (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:36 (sixteen years ago)
I think it depends on the crime and whether or not you find Jesus.
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:43 (sixteen years ago)
Animal rights groups are always going to have a hard time getting past the meat = sustenance equation most of us carnivores hold as true.
― Adventures of Dog Boy and Frank Sobotka (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:28 (10 minutes ago) Bookmark
I call bullshit here. You can farm a hell of a lot more non-meat products in the same space it takes to raise x animals and feed a hell of a lot more people if meat was not such a staple of people's diets. However, I also refuse to be a preachy vegetarian, so i'm going to stop now before boring everyone/myself.
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:44 (sixteen years ago)
it is a sad and miserable world
― Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:45 (sixteen years ago)
xp Yeah you convinced me real good right there.
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:45 (sixteen years ago)
i guess i'm just interested in the impulse among the public that two years in federal prison was not enough punishment--be it motivated by race or the nature of the crime or whatever.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:00 (sixteen years ago)
But all meat is pretty inevitably going to come from what can really only be described as the torture of animals.
nah
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:04 (sixteen years ago)
Well I think part of it has to do with the amount of money athletes are paid. If Michael Vick was going back to his job at Walmart. I think people would be less worked up about this.
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:04 (sixteen years ago)
pretty sure it is possible to get beef from cattle without waterboarding them
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:05 (sixteen years ago)
yeah i guess we do have a pretty big blind spot when it comes to treating athletes as employees.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:05 (sixteen years ago)
"nah"
Right it's going to be the way we get meat that involves nicely asking the pig for its ribs and loin and then it just complies.
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:07 (sixteen years ago)
There's a difference in 'paid his legal debt to society, free him' and 'he deserves to be a millionaire again and that's not going to bother me at all.'
There was an equal amount of uproar, maybe more, about Stallworth getting 1/24 the jail time of Vick, so I don't think there's a double standard being widely applied here (by the public).
― ice cr?m paint job (milo z), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:11 (sixteen years ago)
The real target for ire should be the NFL, of course, where a DUI manslaughter conviction gets you booted for a year.
guys let's talk about vegetarianism on the Internet again
― ovum if you got 'em (gbx), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:12 (sixteen years ago)
dude i've been a vegetarian for 10 years now and even i recognize that killing animals isn't the same thing as torturing them
xpost ok
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3277/2800991295_3b3f1ae8fc.jpg
― ice cr?m paint job (milo z), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)
meat is torture
― congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:14 (sixteen years ago)
do ppl really not separate these two things? his job is unrelated to his crimes.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:16 (sixteen years ago)
how much do you tip your butcher?
― velko, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:17 (sixteen years ago)
they don't get tips! do they?
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:17 (sixteen years ago)
I haven't seen anyone say that part of his sentence should be that he's never allowed to play in the NFL again. So, yeah, they're unrelated in that way. But expecting people to forgive and forget heinous acts committed by celebrities is remarkably naive (and perhaps unfounded - I don't know why it's my job to wish him well because he got out of jail).
If Bernie Madoff had gotten a couple of years in jail, do you think people would have been okay with him resuming a place of wealth and power? If Ken Lay had lived, etc.?
― ice cr?m paint job (milo z), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:21 (sixteen years ago)
bernie madoff executed a scam--he would not be allowed to resume his position of wealth and power.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:22 (sixteen years ago)
Dude, seriously? You don't think white-collar criminals have access to their previous world when they get out of jail?
― ice cr?m paint job (milo z), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:27 (sixteen years ago)
er, don't have access to their previous world
the guy ran a singular scam for over 20 years--he had no discernible skills beyond lying to people--please explain to me what exactly he would do?
this is not like a ceo getting rehired after doing something shitty. i understand why that happens--not sure how it compares to vick tho.
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:29 (sixteen years ago)
"please explain to me what exactly he would do?"
Have a reality show?
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:35 (sixteen years ago)
Oh boy, having flashbacks to that one scene in Earthlings now.
― Peinlich Manoeuvre (NickB), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:42 (sixteen years ago)
Madoff worked in the financial industry for 50 years. He wasn't running a scam for that entire time - he wouldn't have been able to get into position for his scam/fund if he hadn't been rather high up the ladder to start with.
― ice cr?m paint job (milo z), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:45 (sixteen years ago)
ehh yr attempt to draw parallels between vick and madoff/lay is not working for me man
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:56 (sixteen years ago)
Also the thing is that I don't really give a shit if Bernie Madoff gets out of jail 5 years from now and gets a reputable honest job not stealing things. How the hell is it my business? If this is where we are in the world, why not just execute everyone convicted of a crime?
― the schez (grand schez ha ha) (the schef (adam schefter ha ha)), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:00 (sixteen years ago)
i cant believe this even needs to be said, but the meat packing industry is not in the business of torturing animals solely to satisfy blood lust and generate something to bet on. the inhumane conditions are a matter of practicality, not entertainment. vick went out of his way to torture and kill highly intelligent and aware animals in extremely groteseque ways. that's why, say, comparing dogfighting to bullfighting is valid, but comparing vick's crime to bullfighting isn't - he went above and beyond.
― a narwhal done gored my sister nell (cankles), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:05 (sixteen years ago)
fuck yeah.
― sample rants or ?BURNS?. (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:09 (sixteen years ago)
Everytime i see pictures of some of the bitches from that kennel that resemble my own dog i get a little bile from knowing that guy would've joyously killed something i love, just for a powertrip thrill. So I got a personal beef in there, no pun intended.
― sample rants or ?BURNS?. (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:12 (sixteen years ago)
http://11.media.tumblr.com/9cyPFQbgCmavk0j0v9fUw3bho1_400.jpg
― Your heartbeat soun like sasquatch feet (polyphonic), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:17 (sixteen years ago)
Ha!
― Road Closed (SeekAltRoute), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:24 (sixteen years ago)
I like Michael Vick. please don't sb meNot that I ever seen him speak, not that I know anything about him besides him being a great quarterback that got into some trouble dog fighting. Oh and they tried to catch him for weed at least once.
Sometimes I cheer for the con man. Like how people loved Dillinger...Also Vick is far less evil than OJ if that makes a difference in any of youse opinions of him.
― CaptainLorax, Thursday, 20 August 2009 00:48 (sixteen years ago)
yeah dog fighting is unforgivable. i'll like him even if I don't forgive him I guess.
― CaptainLorax, Thursday, 20 August 2009 00:53 (sixteen years ago)
I mean I'll like him as a playeralso i cheered him on in the past (I'm a georgia boy)and I kind of look like a cross between Michael Vick and Rick Morannis
― CaptainLorax, Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:44 (sixteen years ago)
tragicomic mulatto
― velko, Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)
It's not just dogfighting, though. He murdered several dogs himself. The dogfighting is almost beside the point.
― Your heartbeat soun like sasquatch feet (polyphonic), Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)
Right. I accept as true that the farming of plant matter is a whole lot less taxing than the farming of meat.
HOWEVAH - farmed animals = meat = food is pretty much a constant for a whole lot of people.
― Adventures of Dog Boy and Frank Sobotka (B.L.A.M.), Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:50 (sixteen years ago)
and I kind of look like a cross between Michael Vick and Rick Morannis
http://jimbocyberdoc.files.wordpress.com/2007/05/urkel.jpg
― Id rather dig ditches than pull another dudes string (Pancakes Hackman), Thursday, 20 August 2009 20:51 (sixteen years ago)
saw a guy on halloween in full michael vick uniform walking a pitbull around
― luol deng (am0n), Monday, 2 November 2009 22:16 (sixteen years ago)
Lol.
― Lord Byron Bay of Pigs (SeekAltRoute), Monday, 2 November 2009 22:35 (sixteen years ago)
http://is7.itookthisonmyphone.com/m/00118/14b41af8-7bd9-4bc2-a861-76e40aff70b2/2e714168-984b-4575-842e-e1742a2089c4_426x568r270.jpg
Just testing. BLAM face, still saying "Fuck you, Michael Vick."
― Clerk all KNOWIN (B.L.A.M.), Thursday, 4 February 2010 22:27 (sixteen years ago)
reality show taping and one good season as a backup behind him, I'm surprised to find that the rehab seems to have reached the point where he might play as a starter next year. maybe washington?
― forksclovetofu, Thursday, 4 February 2010 22:35 (sixteen years ago)
I'm hoping for the raiders. Just feels right!
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 4 February 2010 23:35 (sixteen years ago)
Tucker Carlson, bastion of righteousness
― assorted curses (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 18:02 (fifteen years ago)
I always love when someone a) first identifies themselves as a Christian and then b) immediately makes a demand for capital punishment
― assorted curses (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 18:03 (fifteen years ago)
I can't get behind execution for Vick.
But he's still an asshole, and pretty much irredeemable for me.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 18:13 (fifteen years ago)
btw he is mike vick now. it was michael vick who killed dogs. basically a different guy.
― Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 18:23 (fifteen years ago)
So glad I can finally trade for him on Madden again.
― I Am Kurious Assange (polyphonic), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 18:25 (fifteen years ago)
i think tucker carlson should be made to fight michael vick in a pit until one of them is killed
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 18:41 (fifteen years ago)
I can't get behind execution for Vick.But he's still an asshole, and pretty much irredeemable for me.
don't understand this at all
in general, and esp since his penitent change in worldview seems so plausible. loads of ppl view animals as just animals, and need to be convinced that their suffering/sentience might be worthy of consideration. you don't really get thou shalt not raise dogs for slaughter in most households.
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)
Sarah Palin murders animals for fun via a helicopter.
― I Am Kurious Assange (polyphonic), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)
love nu-vick, esp when he got sonned by the bears
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:06 (fifteen years ago)
idk isn't the revulsion towards this shit pretty innate, even if u have no great love for dogs and think of them as 'just animals'
i suppose the contrary applies -- if u grew up in a climate where dogfighting is no kinda thing, u would have had to forget feelings of disquiet early on and quickly normalized it
how much of a bastard is vick apart from the dog stuff
― Rockcrit from the Tuoms (nakhchivan), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:08 (fifteen years ago)
loads of ppl view animals as just animals, and need to be convinced that their suffering/sentience might be worthy of consideration.
This is key. I was as angry as anyone when the charges came out because I love dogs/cats/pets in general, but it's true that not everyone is raised to think that way and may view a dog with the same respect with which I view a creepy spider that I'm about to squish. Education and understanding can go a long way.
I really do think this guy has come out the other side of his incarceration a better person (definitely a better quarterback), and I look forward to seeing him mature even more in the coming years.
― Lightning Is For Babies (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:13 (fifteen years ago)
So, I'm supposed to give a pass to person who was born and raised in the United States in the late 20th century because he his different worldview permitted him to systematically breed, raise, train, and then kill dogs, often in a purposefully cruel manner. Hm.
He's going to be pretty sick on the next edition of that game, for sure.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)
I really do think this guy has come out the other side of his incarceration a better person
This may be true, but I'll never know. I guess it comes down to whether you can answer the question of "What if he hadn't been caught - would he still be doing it now?"
The opposing sides in this discussion for me are as follows:
(a) Vick never learned that dogfighting, and all of its attendant activities, are wrong.
(b) Dogs are some of the best, and often only, companions that people have.
Even allowing for (a) to be true, I cannot see how it can be more persuasive to me than (b).
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:24 (fifteen years ago)
he didn't get a pass, he went to jail and seems genuinely contrite. it is entirely possible that he went to jail not thinking that what he did was wrong, morally, and that time and introspection made him think "wtf that shit is terrible, scales lifted"
I'm just saying that that is a believable transformation of character. vs say someone that murdered another person in cold blood.
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:25 (fifteen years ago)
vs say someone that murdered another person in cold blood.
For some people, a person-murderer is more likely to get a pass, or least a clearer shot at redemption, than a dog-murderer. IDGI
― Lightning Is For Babies (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:28 (fifteen years ago)
the q of whether or not he'd still be doing it is stupid, and immaterial---he got busted, and I guess I believe that it was getting busted that made him say "wait a minute"
aren't you a lawyer? isn't that what incarceration is supposed to do ffs?
and yr a/b construct makes no sense
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:29 (fifteen years ago)
like what if it had been a cock fighting ring?? or a boar fighting ring? would that be less offensive to you? because if so, then I don't think yr understanding my argument at all.
should all the matadors in Spain go to jail?
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:31 (fifteen years ago)
Vick's prison sentence didn't make dog fighting go away, so quit focusing on him, B.L.A.M., and focus on the thousands of other people out there who are still doing it and getting away with it. Not going to be any changed hearts in that world until all of them do some time. xps
― Lightning Is For Babies (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:33 (fifteen years ago)
cock fighting is sublime
― buzza, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)
^^^board descrip?
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)
yes BLAM you and michael vick were raised with exactly the same cultural and moral values because you are both from the late 20th century US
― got a bad habit I might OD of markers (crüt), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
Yes, but whether I actually feel that he has been rehabilitated is the actual question here. And I'm not sure.
That's what I'm seeing as the conflicting p.o.v.s for me. If you're approaching this from a different angle, that's you, not me.
like what if it had been a cock fighting ring?? or a boar fighting ring? would that be less offensive to you? Probably, but not necessarily - my feelings on this one are based on it involving dogs, so these examples of other animal blood sports, which I'm not in favor of either, are really not relevant.
should all the matadors in Spain go to jail? If they did that in America, probably.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:44 (fifteen years ago)
Canine exceptionalism
― I Am Kurious Assange (polyphonic), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)
No, no - I recognize there are cultural differences. I have black friends.
My point was that, in America today, if you feel that dogfighting is alright, then you are the exception and not the norm. And as that exception is morally offensive to a whole lot of others, maybe you should have been aware of the potential WRONGNESS of what you were doing prior to being caught, sentenced, and incarcerated.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:49 (fifteen years ago)
Do you have any evidence that he hasn't been rehabilitated, or would you just prefer to believe the worst?
― pixel farmer, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:55 (fifteen years ago)
I have black friends.
Oh, you didn't just type that.
― Lightning Is For Babies (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)
he paid his time, whats the prob here exactly?
no one's asking him to pet-sit for you
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:57 (fifteen years ago)
my friends are black btw
― buzza, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:58 (fifteen years ago)
I'm perfectly fine with being skeptical about the supposed rehabilitation of a person who did what he did for such a long time, lost a whole lot of money because of getting caught, and now has to pay back his creditors as best he can by being a part of the entertainment industry. He has to look the part to play the part, doesn't he?
I'm kidding. I don't even KNOW any black people.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 19:59 (fifteen years ago)
im not sure whether it matters that he is really sorry or just feels like he has to be, because it means hes not abusing dogs either way, so
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)
No, its true. I am taking a pretty vocal stance on this.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)
no shots at you here BLAM, but the vick question is bound up in quandries of race, animal rights, classism, anti-athlete bias, anti-black quarterback bias, mason/dixon line perception gap, prison industrial complex business-as-usual and religious/moral redemption. It's being primarily debated by folks with minimum cross doctrinal understanding of most of the interconnecting finer points. To wit: a bowtied white conservative television talking head, in direct opposition to the president, suggests that a multimillionaire black superstar quarterback should be, quite literally, lynched because of his crimes against dogs. in 20fucking10, this kind of hyperbolic nonsense has no place. carlson is a tone deaf asshole who would paint his dick red if he thought it would get his name in the Post more often.
i think i've said a dozen times in here that I'm always gonna have a kernel of hate for folks who would callously kill animals that look exactly like my own pup, but dude has managed to right his own public life enough that i'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for overcoming some exceptionally heinous actions without any post-incarceration recidivism... i mean, i didn't expect him to kill a half dozen poodles on some sort of falling-off-the-wagon jag or anything, but he's said and done the right things thus far.
I'd appreciate it if he'd shut the fuck up about how he wants to own a dog though, get over that shit and console yourself with your millions of dollars and probowl status. Get your daughter a cat.
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)
I really, really hate this defense. "Paid his time" doesn't completely absolve him of what was done.
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)
yeah but that's between him and god imo
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)
anyway forks otm
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)
maybe you should have been aware of the potential WRONGNESS of what you were doing
^^^ not going to contradict this. Obv vick should have known better. And ignorance wouldn't have excused him, either. The point is whether he has learned and whether you can forgive him. For me the potential for forgiveness is in direct proportion to the extent he has changed.
Since it is next to impossible to penetrate the media smokescreen around someone like vick, this is an imponderable. All you can say for certain is that he isn't stupid enough to start up dog fighting again, now that he was caught. I'd like to think it went deeper than that.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)
no shots at you here BLAM, but the vick question is bound up in quandries of race, animal rights, classism, anti-athlete bias, anti-black quarterback bias, mason/dixon line perception gap, prison industrial complex business-as-usual and religious/moral redemption. It's being primarily debated by folks with minimum cross doctrinal understanding of most of the interconnecting finer points.
Absolutely, 100% true. Vick was a polarizing figure before he was caught and all this came to light, and it has only increased the complexity of the issue.
And my original statement, in the thread title, is about as far as I'll go in terms of acting on my feelings towards the man, which seems like it is right about the same as you on the "kernel of hate" level. Its not like I'm going to, or ever would, make a more public display of my feelings on this.
^^^^ is probably the best way to sum up the current state of affairs on this.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)
I was bitching mroe about that defense in general, but it came up specifically wrt to Vick over the weekend. Not saying deej is riding this as hard as the cousin I was arguing about it with this weekend was, but his entire logic was predicated around "paid his dues and should now be welcomed back into society/NFL with open arms". Sorry, but I don't agree with that. Using that same logic, someone that did twenty years for molesting kids should be welcomed back after "doing his time" with no questions asked. Er, no, it doesn't really work that way, imho. But I've been proven to be in the minority when this gets applied to a case like Vick's.
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:09 (fifteen years ago)
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:04 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
you're right -- society should enact some kind of law...
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)
also wrt recidivism I'm guessing its a little harder to have a moment of weakness and accidentally fire up a brutal criminal enterprise than it is to do a line of coke or punch yr girlfriend or something.
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)
Would you allow him to volunteer at a dog shelter?
― I Am Kurious Assange (polyphonic), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:09 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
um, isnt the implication in comparing this to pedophilia the concern that its a psychological disease where they're very likely to NOT have come to terms w/ it
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)
I'd encourage it (if it was a no-kill shelter).
― Lightning Is For Babies (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
kinda think that endorsing societal stigma for ex cons is morally repellent but I understand I'm an outlier on that one
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
i mean could u think of a more loaded example, lol
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
"just imagine, for a moment, if he were a football player who had sex with children..."
totally!
Okay, yeah, a poor example, but I think my point was made?
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, December 29, 2010 3:14 PM (56 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
otm
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)
kinda think that endorsing societal stigma for ex cons is morally repellent
I basically agree with this, but Vick is an extreme case of a con who immediately was thrust back into a life of fame and fortune so we're not exactly talking about some guy looking for a gig at the Foot Locker.
― I Am Kurious Assange (polyphonic), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)
polyphonic OTM
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)
i have no idea what that even means
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)
It could just as easily have been that scenario, though. Say that no NFL organization was willing to take a shot with him. I guess he could've played in the CFL or in the Arena League or whatever, but those guys have day jobs.
― Lightning Is For Babies (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)
But I'm really not going to argue this point any more, at least not with deej, because he has a fundamental inability to acknowledge that others might have a different worldview from him.
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
because hes famous therefor he should remain in the system for however long people feel like
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
how does jeff garcia fit into all this is what i'm asking
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)
I'm on the pro-Vick side in this argument. I just think it's weird to equate him with every other ex-con when his situation is so unique.
― I Am Kurious Assange (polyphonic), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)
whatevs dog lovers be insane, want to keep a guy in jail forever while gop vp candidate tortures animals on tv for fun
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)
― I Am Kurious Assange (polyphonic), Wednesday, December 29, 2010 3:20 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
well hes v equatable w/other ex cons as far as the paid his debt to society concept goes
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:22 (fifteen years ago)
No, no - in terms of paying his debt to society, he did his time, and he's good on that count - but this doesn't wipe his slate clean, imo.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)
do you understand what paying yr debt to society means
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)
zing ate my post. :(
but basically he's back in the NFL bein successful because they wanted him because he makes ppl rich. how this makes him less worthy of absolution vs a guy that isn't famous and cant get a job is beyond my understanding, but w/e take it up with yr spiritual counsel
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:18 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
rmde
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)
I don't understand what is so confusing to you guys about a convicted felon's crime not magically disappearing once their time is done. I mean, Vick is a weird case and I'm generally on board with ex-cons getting a second chance at a fair life, but I'm pretty sure that if someone murdered a family member you wouldn't be all "lol come here you, give me a big hug" after they finished out their prison term.
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)
otm. I mean there are seven million people in the system and nearly all of them will get out.
― Super Cub, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:28 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
would you prefer he wear a scarlet letter? go door to door advising neighbors about his dog abuser status if he moves in a neighborhood that has dogs?
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)
haha yeah. like uh guys I was under the impression that doing time was so that when you were done society would say "we're square". obv you don't have to forgive if you don't want to on a personal level, but demanding that a whiff of disrepute follow a dude around after he's out misses the whole point of having jail in the first place
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)
― Super Cub, Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:29 PM (53 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
but they work at foot locker so they're easier to feel bad for
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:31 (fifteen years ago)
Michael Vick did not kill my dog btw
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)
can mike vick vote?
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not sure that there is one absolute meaning for that phrase. What I'm pretty sure it doesn't mean is being welcomed back on a victory lap of "This is yet another redemptive milestone for Mike Vick!"
Was what he did the worst thing ever? No. Was it bad? Yes.
Should he be barred from pursuing his chosen career because of it? So long as what he was convicted of doesn't indicate proclivities which will preclude his ability to pursue that career in a safe manner, go ahead. (Thinking convicted molester pursing career as a teacher, or something similar)
But just because he is able to pick up his superstar athlete career, and be better than he ever was before, doesn't mean I have to be happy about it or give him a "Good job!"
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
obv you don't have to forgive if you don't want to on a personal level, but demanding that a whiff of disrepute follow a dude around after he's out misses the whole point of having jail in the first place
Well, it misses out on ONE point of having jail. I don't think it necessarily makes wrong any societal repercussions he faces, such as boos or ill will.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
there are actually lots of ppl that end up forgiving a murderer of a friend or family member if/when they come to believe that many of the motivations/factors leading up to the act were not exactly in control of the perpetrator
― BIG SANTA aka the sleighdriver (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:34 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark
yeah, well no one is saying this
― BIG SANTA aka the sleighdriver (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, well no one is saying this ...
... in this thread.
― I Am Kurious Assange (polyphonic), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
(xp) Well, not here, but judging by the fellatiating he's received this year by sports commentators, you would think otherwise.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
I can see this, but I don't think I'll ever come to that understanding with Vick. I could be wrong, but I don't see it.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:39 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark
yeah, the thing is that sports commentators are -- probably rightfully -- not paid or asked to judge people beyond what they do on the field
― BIG SANTA aka the sleighdriver (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)
well tbf I'm coming from a v personal angle here. but like if you are going to allow for something as brutal and inhumane as a prison system to be a part of society, id hope that actually doing time would be enough of a punishment that afterwards yr neighbors would go "ok I think you've had enough" and yeah, actually welcome you back to the fold. institutional punishment ought to engender institutional forgiveness, in a way, but obv it doesn't work like that.
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)
You're probably right. I don't typically look to Ron Jaworski or Phil Simms as my moral compasses.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)
it's time for a little moral "phil"osophy
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)
"and that's my ethical... LOCKE... of the week!"
There are plenty of sports commentators who are more than willing to opine on moral matters fwiw
― I Am Kurious Assange (polyphonic), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:46 (fifteen years ago)
institutional punishment ought to engender institutional forgiveness, in a way, but obv it doesn't work like that.
I totally understand this point, but there are certain people for whom the punishments prescribed by the American justice system do not fit the crimes to which they are applied. For example, some people feel capital punishment would be a justified punishment for rape.
Along with that, a lot of people don't believe that punishment means you've been rehabilitated. And I think this is where I fall out on the whole "he's paid his debt" argument. How could a person who did what he did for so long and on such a scale just turn the corner in two short years? Is it possible? Sure. Do I think it happened? No, because I haven't been convinced of it yet.
Another thing to think of is that he is being pilloried as a symbol of animal abuse, which is not necessarily the most fair thing, but probably not the least fair, either.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)
so you think he should have done more time
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:50 (fifteen years ago)
forgiveness isn't predicated on time served
― zvookster, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)
as long as none of those dogs were wearing sunglasses, I don't give a shit
― nog it out with (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, i understand where your coming from i think, but when you say that this doesn't wipe vick's slate clean, i think you mean it doesn't wipe YOUR slate clean. which is your right, but there are limits to enforceability on that one.
― rhymes with a$$ange (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, December 29, 2010 3:24 PM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, December 29, 2010 3:25 PM (18 minutes ago)
he has paid his debt to society....and still owes us
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
cannot believe we are having this discussion, gbx & forks & deej otm
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:54 (fifteen years ago)
100% true.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:55 (fifteen years ago)
Well, its either this, or do work. I'm not really in the working mood, tbh.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)
You are honestly shocked that some people might not be 100% onboard with forgiving Vick and giving him his spot back in the limelight?
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)
no, i'm amazed that people don't live the serenity prayer on the internets
― rhymes with a$$ange (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:58 (fifteen years ago)
like uh guys I was under the impression that doing time was so that when you were done society would say "we're square". obv you don't have to forgive if you don't want to on a personal level, but demanding that a whiff of disrepute follow a dude around after he's out misses the whole point of having jail in the first place
gbx & forks & deej otm
^^^ also this
― daria-g, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)
the spotlight/success thing is a non issue since the ppl that saw fit to bring him back to the NFL made their decision for less than altruistic reasons. Vick in the NFL makes ppl money, full stop. what would expect? that they'd offer him a job and that he'd turn it down because he didn't deserve it? or that the NFL would not want him because he was a v bad man, jersey/ticket/etc sales be damned!
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
i don't actually understand who is supposed to forgive him? um, who died and made you god? people like tucker carlson have a good reason for not 'forgiving' him because not doing so gets them on tv = $$$$$$$$$
― daria-g, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
No one is. I haven't. Fuck you, Mike Vick.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)
um, who died and made you god?
Uh, pretty sure I have the right to forgive or not forgive anyone at all. This doesn't mean my forgiveness has to mean anything to anyone but myself, but pretty sure its not illegal for me to harbor ill will.
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
And gbx, you're totally right - he makes money for people.
That doesn't do anything to my opinion of him.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
"some people", no; regular posters on this board, yeah kind of.
i'm not sure what vick has to do to please BLAM but he's gone to prison and come out pretty obviously a better person. i mean there are people out there who are cool with stigmatizing ex-cons but those people are called conservatives and no one likes them
xps
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
and look, you could argue that it's a small price to pay for fame & fortune, but if i did what vick did and did his time and got out and moved to california, i could live my whole life w/ no one knowing my past, aside from trying to get a job -- vick on the other hand actually does wear a scarlet letter, and will for his whole life probably -- he'll always get shit from ppl no matter where he goes or what he does
again, it's not like i feel bad for him, but i'm not sure if his peace of mind is exactly square w/ fame & fortune
― BIG SANTA aka the sleighdriver (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:04 (fifteen years ago)
i think the only thing that still rankles for me is that people seem to be all "GODDAMN he's playing good, okay i can forgive him" but if he came out and was at, say, Kitna levels, I doubt there'd be a continuous groundswell of support at every turn. USA loves a winner and can forgive anything if you're winning. Curious to see how philly fans react if they lose in the first round and skid the first three games of the 2011 season.
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:04 (fifteen years ago)
I miss the days when he was calling himself Ron Mexico and giving girls herpes.
― I Am Kurious Assange (polyphonic), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:05 (fifteen years ago)
Loving this thread.
― Jeff, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, December 29, 2010 3:04 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
good post
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)
― nog it out with (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:53 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
forks & whiney, your slates are clean with me
This is what is keeping the "kernel of hate" stoked in my belly.
And my closest Philly fan friend, also a dog owner, has openly said he will consider totally forgetting about the dogfighting thing if he wins a Super Bowl.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)
guys, he played last year & he wasn't good at all -- were philly fans calling for his head? i don't really know or remember -- maybe kev can fill us in
― BIG SANTA aka the sleighdriver (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)
daria, we all form judgments on public figures.
― zvookster, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:10 (fifteen years ago)
i support vick btw
i think it's strange to decry the brutality of the justice system and simultaneously trust its judgments as perfectly fitting down not just to the minute but the very measure of a man's soul. it's like you've all handed over moral authority to this machinery.
vick played as a second string qb and mostly did wildcat bullshit gimmick plays, there was no intention of him being the starting qb this year
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)
my impression was that vick was tolerated last year as doing bench pennance and basically being mcnabb's insurance, lolz at how that turned out
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:12 (fifteen years ago)
and nothing personal to philly fans, but i will be SHOCKED, SHOCKED I SAY, if this eagles team makes it past the second round
Thank you, I had been trying to compose a similar response, but kept being distracted by real work.
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:12 (fifteen years ago)
i will totally turn on vick if he starts playing poorly but it won't have anything to do with dogfighting
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)
zvookster's point is kind of a red herring tbh - i'm not sure finding fault with the justice system as it is precludes one from believing that someone who is punished for a crime ought to be given a clean slate after he's out, given they're truly remorseful
of course BLAM's main point it seems is that he doesn't trust vick is actually remorseful, or that somehow he hasn't earned this resurgence. at a point it sort of comes down to giving people the benefit of the doubt...i mean i'm not sure how much better vick could have handled all of this
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:25 (fifteen years ago)
daria, we all form judgments on public figures
i guess. i don't really understand the concept of forgiving/not forgiving someone who i don't know, will never meet, and who has done nothing to me personally (aside from embarrassing the hell out of the redskins on national television). it seems kind of arrogant - the courts said he did something wrong and for that, he did a couple years in federal prison and lost his career and all his money, and his debt to society is paid after all that. but the important thing is whether i decide to forgive him? who cares?
― daria-g, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:26 (fifteen years ago)
i sympathize w/ daria but that's a pretty unrealistic expectation for most ppl as we're all inherently judgmental in many respects
― a snooki and a killer (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)
of course BLAM's main point it seems is that he doesn't trust vick is actually remorseful, or that somehow he hasn't earned this resurgence.
Yes on the first, no on the second. Who am I to say that he hasn't earned anything? I wasn't on the jury who convicted him, and his presence on the Eagles hasn't changed my football watching habits one bit.
'm not sure how much better vick could have handled all of this
I don't think its how better Vick could have handled this. Its how better Vick and his whole team could have handled this. Which then returns to the question of how much $$$ is he worth to people, and the answer is clearly "a lot."
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)
i do agree tho that it's pointless and kind of hazardous to try and read the tea leaves w/ vick -- he has done everything that someone in his position can & should be expected to do (incl PETA cooperation & talking to kids), so i think it's right to give him the benefit of the doubt that he is remorseful & will not kill dogs again
― a snooki and a killer (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:30 (fifteen years ago)
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, December 29, 2010 3:12 PM (17 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
if anything i feel like his time behind bars is about the max i think a dog abuser should get. if u want to complain about the injustice of the criminal justice system his doesnt rank v high for me, imo
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:31 (fifteen years ago)
yeah but imo our society sends way too people away to prison and gives them little to nothing w/r/t rehabilitation which is bad enough, and i just think it's wrong to keep punishing/shaming them after the fact after the sentence/restitution/etc is done with.
― daria-g, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:33 (fifteen years ago)
blam with the last part of that post are you saying philly should have not signed vick because of his criminal history? what do you mean by that
― k3vin k., Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:33 (fifteen years ago)
Wait am I supposed to be mad at Vick because I'm supposed to believe he's got like this insatiable doggy-killing streak that he's only managed to suppress since he's been out the joint but he could strike again if we let our guard down or something??
― infinity rebounding stats (m bison), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:34 (fifteen years ago)
the unplayability of felons is pretty gross & has tons to do w/ recidivism rates
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:35 (fifteen years ago)
enEMPLOYability
stupid autocorrect
unplayalisticadillacmuzik
― a snooki and a killer (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:38 (fifteen years ago)
blam with the last part of that post are you saying philly should have not signed vick because of his criminal history? what do you mean by that?
No. What I mean is that I'm not sure we'll ever get a true measure of the man because of the amount of institutional support for him.
Not that I feel I'm necessarily entitled to it, but I'm just pointing out that what we see of Mike Vick is not Mike Vick - its Mike Vick, plus the entire support of the Philadelphia Eagles organization, and, to at least some extent, the NFL.
The guy has every right to resume his football career. Just like I have every right to continue to think he's a scumbag for what he did. And to not have him on my team in Madden.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:41 (fifteen years ago)
Yes. Hide your dog.
it seems bizarre to make this point and yet condemn solely michael vick -- this is true of every single star athlete
― a snooki and a killer (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)
deej you're totally missing the point in that response to jon. concerns are abt the system itself. blam, what if u believed vick was genuinely remorseful? what would yr attitude to him be?
― zvookster, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)
He's the topic of this thread. If you want to expand it to include all other stars, athletes or otherwise, I'll happily do so.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:44 (fifteen years ago)
blam, what if u believed vick was genuinely remorseful? what would yr attitude to him be?
My opinion certainly would change for the positive.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:45 (fifteen years ago)
well as long as you acknowledge that every star athlete is afforded those same privileges, that's good enough for me
― a snooki and a killer (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:45 (fifteen years ago)
i can't call myself a 'vick defender' or anything -- there were people like that, all along, from 2007 -- but for all the crimes in the world and all the people who get away with them, taking a moment's judgment for rich athlete michael vick and his dog fighting is a moment i don't have. it just falls out of any real perspective imo.
― goole, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)
― zvookster, Wednesday, December 29, 2010 3:43 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
fuck the system maaaan
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)
i mean, dude ... the system is bullshit but like, in debates like these its pretty much the only yardstick unless u have a line to st peter
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)
if you put a gun to my head i'd say that vick probably isn't totally remorseful over the act of killing dogs, or that he can't separate remorse over being put in jail from remorse from the act of killing dogs, but i don't know that & he's done everything right since being released, so innocent until proven guilty etc
― a snooki and a killer (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)
lol @ it being the only yardstick, u really are a robotic authoritarian stooge deej
― zvookster, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:49 (fifteen years ago)
Totally. They can get away with murder, and still live to make many millions of dollars - for instance, Ray Lewis.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:51 (fifteen years ago)
― zvookster, Wednesday, December 29, 2010 3:49 PM (23 seconds ago) Bookmark
i believe that a just society should have a court system that punishes offenders sorry libertarian fantasylandman?
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:51 (fifteen years ago)
do u have a just society? arguing with u...it's like u neither read nor think tbh
― zvookster, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:53 (fifteen years ago)
really confused what u are arguing zvookster
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:57 (fifteen years ago)
michael vick beat dogs, i think he should face courts, he did, if anything his sentence seems a lil heavy to me, he has paid his debt, but yeah i think 1+oz of marijuana being a felony is messed up. im not sure how that invalidates the argument ppl are making here
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 21:58 (fifteen years ago)
I think he's twisting/misunderstanding my "institutional forgiveness" thing upthread maybe
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:00 (fifteen years ago)
lotta slippages btw law, justice, punishment, forgiveness itt
― max, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:03 (fifteen years ago)
i dont want to tell anyone how to live their lives but michael vick is anywhere near your top 100 ppl who dont deserve to be forgiven ever *shrugs*
― max, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:04 (fifteen years ago)
no gbx, i just don't think our attitudes to ppl shld be shaped by the extent they were punished by the courts. i don't think u can argue the justice system is brutal and sprawling and then set yr moral compass by its results.
― zvookster, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:05 (fifteen years ago)
and like if you dont like that mike vick is being welcomed w/ open arms... homie why are you mad at michael vick for that
― max, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:06 (fifteen years ago)
good thing I didn't do that xp
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:06 (fifteen years ago)
Why are people upset that there are people who are still mad at Michael Vick?
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:07 (fifteen years ago)
i don't think anyone is upset
― a snooki and a killer (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:08 (fifteen years ago)
Like that seems even dumber than still being mad at Michael Vick, but whatever.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:08 (fifteen years ago)
# Fuck You, Michael Vick [Started by B.L.A.M. in July 2007, last updated 14 seconds ago] 157 new answers
don't think you have to be upset to argue an opposite position, but whatever
― a snooki and a killer (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)
Upset, concerned, trolling, dicking around, whatever you want to call it.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)
― zvookster, Wednesday, December 29, 2010 4:05 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
yah who did this what where why? i hope your next post contains some insight into how difficult it is to argue with deej as well
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:10 (fifteen years ago)
i'll go w/ discussing, i don't see why that is surprising
― a snooki and a killer (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:10 (fifteen years ago)
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, December 29, 2010 4:09 PM (14 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
so you cant understand why people would want to argue with someone saying that they'll never forgive vick? people here argue about everything
"why are you people discussing your opinions on a message board? what kind of place is this?"
― a snooki and a killer (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:11 (fifteen years ago)
I don't recall saying I couldn't understand it.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:11 (fifteen years ago)
I am well aware that deej will pick arguments with lawn furniture.
im aware alex will post smug opinions like comic book store guy
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:13 (fifteen years ago)
Lamest retort ever.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:14 (fifteen years ago)
*shrug*
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:14 (fifteen years ago)
its my fault tbh, and the only reason that I took issue with "not forgiving" Vick is because the nature of the crime suggested to me that whatever derangement precipitated it (dogs are mere beasts) was one that lent itself to the kind of philosophical transformation one might weakly hope that a spell in the clink might afford. versus say a mentally ill molester or sociopathic murderer or money making drug dealer or whatever.
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:16 (fifteen years ago)
well i can't really remember now but it was argued against blam's attitude to vick that blam was putting a scarlet letter on ex-cons, since vick had served his time. if u have no misgivings abt the justice system that's one thing, i guess, but if u do it seems especially disingenuous to not recognize ppl can have opinions separate from Law & Order. the issue of remorse seems more fruitful than "he served his time".
― zvookster, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:16 (fifteen years ago)
i could easily see 'money making drug dealer' fitting into the former category on occasion tbh xp
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:17 (fifteen years ago)
― zvookster, Wednesday, December 29, 2010 4:16 PM (40 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
but wasn't blam's expression of his opinion a response of disgust to other people who felt that he HAD been punished enough as much as it was an expression of his own feelings in a vacuum
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:18 (fifteen years ago)
ergo just as subject to the fallacy you're accusing us of
which is to say: may as well give dude benefit of the doubt, it seems more plausible to me that he's genuinely penitent than it is that he's secretly pissed that he cant murder dogs anymore.
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:19 (fifteen years ago)
totes
They can get away with murder, and still live to make many millions of dollars - for instance, Ray Lewis.
wait, aren't you a lawyer? the charges were dropped against ray lewis. this doesn't mean he got away with murder.
also, re: whether vick is genuinely remorseful/penitent - by what standard can we ever tell that? it's impossible to prove one way or the other imo
― daria-g, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)
it's as impossible to know one way or another about whether vick is really pinkie-swear sorry as it is about every other convicted person.
― goole, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:23 (fifteen years ago)
if vick's celebrity is the reason he "got away with it", it's also the reason he'll never get away with it, get me?
― goole, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:24 (fifteen years ago)
Iirc, the charges were dropped in exchange for his testimony against his two codefendants, against whom the charges were also dropped.
So, to me, this means that he made a timely plea deal.
Yup, and when you've got an established record as a dog-killing criminal, you've got a good bit to overcome in my book.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)
zvookster no one at anytime said you couldn't have opinions separate from law and order. I was speaking to a societal attitude that allows and encourages not just "opinions" but overt stigmatization of ex cons.
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)
I say this with affection but I kinda want to put a arms_crossed.gif after all yr posts BLAM.
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:28 (fifteen years ago)
I'm totally okay with B.L.A.M. not wanting to forgive Michael Vick (who I doubt is going to lose sleep about this.)
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:30 (fifteen years ago)
cool
― a snooki and a killer (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:32 (fifteen years ago)
Hey, look - I wouldn't be any good at life, let alone my job or anything else included therein if I weren't alright with disagreeing with other folks.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:32 (fifteen years ago)
thumbs up bro
― max, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:32 (fifteen years ago)
"please explain to me what exactly he would do?"Have a reality show?― Alex in SF, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Alex in SF, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Not sure how I missed that Vick actually did have a reality show!!!
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:33 (fifteen years ago)
waht
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:34 (fifteen years ago)
it was on bet
― a snooki and a killer (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:34 (fifteen years ago)
I had no idea either
I am so out of touch with what is on television these days.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:36 (fifteen years ago)
i don't think it was a big deal -- it took me a few seconds to remember it just now
― a snooki and a killer (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:37 (fifteen years ago)
Apparently the Eagles made him pull the plug on Season 2 as a condition of playing for them this year.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:39 (fifteen years ago)
he doesn't have to overcome anything. i mean, whatever the threshold is in order to get you to change your mind and forgive the guy - how does this matter? if he was part of your family and you were debating whether or not to invite him over for christmas dinner, then i'd understand the importance.
― daria-g, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:39 (fifteen years ago)
Uh daria-g did you miss the original post where BLAM said he dropped him from his Madden team?
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:41 (fifteen years ago)
xp it was a crass humanizing maneuver and an attempt to "play to his base" i watched half an episode and it was about as in depth as keshia cole's reality show
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:41 (fifteen years ago)
did not know that the iggles made him drop it tho, that's interesting how they want to play this without actually playing it
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:42 (fifteen years ago)
how does this matter?
It may not. This doesn't mean that my opinion is any less valid.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:43 (fifteen years ago)
Actually I misread the quote. Apparently BET asked him to do a second season and he turned it down.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:44 (fifteen years ago)
keyshia cole had a reality show?
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:44 (fifteen years ago)
im dropping her from my madden team
w/ her crazy mom!! c'mon man
― a snooki and a killer (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:45 (fifteen years ago)
xp Yeah but she apologized and now she's trying to adopt one of Sarah Palin's kids.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:45 (fifteen years ago)
how does it compare w/ the show about t.i.'s wife
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:46 (fifteen years ago)
I wonder if Michael Vick is allowed to play Nintendogs.
― I Am Kurious Assange (polyphonic), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:46 (fifteen years ago)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/kidzworld_photo/images/2010615/96d7760d-e100-4cb4-a4ff-bfc5830d7f20/gallery_kinectimal.jpg
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:47 (fifteen years ago)
heh. i guess dropping from madden prob has few consequences.
but i do kind of wonder.. as a society, what about other people who've done their time in prison after being convicted.. well i suppose we justifiably have no faith in the system to actually rehabilitate people, so once they're out it becomes an issue of judging for yourself? which is messed up imo
― daria-g, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:48 (fifteen years ago)
"well i suppose we justifiably have no faith in the system to actually rehabilitate people, so once they're out it becomes an issue of judging for yourself? which is messed up imo"
Our prison system is pretty lousy. Strangely some of the best programs are the ones involving inmates training dogs (don't judge these by OZ btw hah)
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:53 (fifteen years ago)
conflating vick's situation, or any arrested celebrity, with "the system" at large, feels somehow wrong. They're under greater duress and focus and more primed to do time (in my mind) for ticky tack bullshit (as long as they're black, mirit, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Popper#Legal_trouble)
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:54 (fifteen years ago)
daria must be an incredibly saintly person to not ever judge anyone
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:54 (fifteen years ago)
er: "more primed to do time (in my mind)[once they've already got a rap sheet for ticky tack bullshit"
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:55 (fifteen years ago)
xp She just dropped you from her Madden team, jon.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:55 (fifteen years ago)
does your perception of the sufficiency of his sentence play any role in your opinion, blam? if vick's legal penalty had been higher, would that make it "better?" would his career success be more acceptable or forgiveable to you upon his release from a longer custody? i suspect not, you seem to want a societal penalty in which vick is shunned, perhaps allowed a subsistence level position in the world. it seems if we are going to distinguish the penalty doled out by the criminal justice system from the general penalty administered by society, a clear statement as to what exactly you want from society wrt vick is appropriate.
in the area of extra-judicial, societal "sanction": _plenty_ of ppl do think that vick is shit, his endorsement value has been severely damaged, and he's "lost" more money than most of us will make in a lifetime. and again, if you have a problem with ppl "forgiving" him for whatever reason, your beef is with "people." it's not like there's a shortage of zealous advocates for the position that vick is a monster.
i personally think he's a severely damaged dirtbag, but that's about as far as i can take it, knowing the relatively little that i know about the condition of his morality or his soul.
― rhymes with a$$ange (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)
No, I don't think I'm advocating a more punitive sentence for him. And if he can make a go at being a pro football player, have at it. But I just have a problem with his recent success on the football field leading to a lot of people trumpeting his redemption.
I can get behind "severely damaged dirtbag" as the standard description.
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 23:01 (fifteen years ago)
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, December 29, 2010 5:54 PM (26 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
dogg did u even read what she said or
― max, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 23:22 (fifteen years ago)
was gonna say
― zvookster, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 23:29 (fifteen years ago)
but yes daria is an incredibly saintly person
― max, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 23:30 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.iconsnunanastasia.com/icons_saints_f/st.daria.jpg
― buzza, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 23:34 (fifteen years ago)
what a clusterfuck thread.
anywho, I was definitely one of the vocal anti-Vicksters when he was jailed, and I certainly was one of those who dreaded his return, as I didn't want to see him succeed. But he came back and did and I found it just doesn't bother me at all.
What he did was heinous for sure, and it's not one of those things that you can oversimplify and say "he made a mistake!" about, but dude served his prison term, and it's time for him to live his life. He may never prevail in the court of public opinion, but well frankly that doesn't mean much other than helping you defeat your own cognitive dissonance.
Nobody will ever know if he's just a good PR whore or if he's truly contrite, but that's because we in society only purport to believe in redemption and remorse, but are mostly skeptical of people. And that's partially based on the fact that many resume their criminal activities upon release from prison, but a large cause of that is that society doesn't allow them to re-integrate themselves (ie difficulty finding work, housing, etc), so they turn revert to their old lifestyle. Obviously that's a broad brush to paint all ex-cons with, but it is a contributing factor.
As for whether he should have been banned from football, FUCK no. Not in a league that allowed pieces of shit like Leonard Little, who really to this day hasn't shown much remorse, to serve only a partial year's suspension. Or other similar cases.
I'm not sure if I'm sold on whether he's fully redeemed himself yet or not, but it's not something I give great thought to because it simply doesn't matter. He served his time, he's playing ball, and he's staying out of trouble. That's all we can ask of him at the moment, he does have to go on living his life after all.
Some people got way OTT with this shit too, a friend of mine starts ranting every time she sees his name and talking about how corrupt the NFL is that he's still playing...and she seems to not realize how many players who've done far worse have had far more lenient fates within the NFL. Really Vick's sentence (both legal and NFL) was as hefty as it was because it was a Federal case.
― yelawolfenstein (San Te), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 23:37 (fifteen years ago)
I also really don't like fingerpointing because I couldn't have had a more normal, privileged childhood if I tried, so none of my personal experience equates to his as our environments were different. Not excusing, but y'know it does play a large role.
― yelawolfenstein (San Te), Wednesday, 29 December 2010 23:38 (fifteen years ago)
― kanellos (gbx), Wednesday, December 29, 2010 3:14 PM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
u r not alone, as i think others may have said.
anyway, can i just have a list of who revealed themselves to be a cryptoconservative weirdo in here?
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 00:44 (fifteen years ago)
who do u think is endorsing societal stigma for ex-cons?
who do u think is a cryptoconservative wweirdo?
:)
― zvookster, Thursday, 30 December 2010 00:48 (fifteen years ago)
i didn't want to read the whole thread to find out ;_;
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 00:49 (fifteen years ago)
yeah I don't think anyone outed themselves as anything really. I only said that as a generality
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 00:52 (fifteen years ago)
gotcha--tho 220 new answers indicates that someone was taking a wacky position!
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 00:54 (fifteen years ago)
Then God said, "Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground."
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 30 December 2010 00:59 (fifteen years ago)
"and make them fight, because that will be exciting."
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 01:00 (fifteen years ago)
implied
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 30 December 2010 01:00 (fifteen years ago)
*raises hand*
― Sauvignon Blanc Mange (B.L.A.M.), Thursday, 30 December 2010 01:09 (fifteen years ago)
Speaking of Vick and reality shows, has the suggestion/joke been made about making him go on a season of "Pitbulls & Parolees" yet?
― Crazed Mister Handy (kingfish), Thursday, 30 December 2010 01:12 (fifteen years ago)
Great Thread http://forums.hellproject.com/Smileys/default/emot-thumbsup.gif
― Princess TamTam, Thursday, 30 December 2010 01:33 (fifteen years ago)
ayo dudes i was out for a while thinking abt all this vick and im gonna zoom out for a second go back in time and say michael vick got screwed over by peoples emotional attachment to dogs and he shouldnt have gone to prison / been the object of hatred for every self righteous motherfucker in the world
a. millions of animals are killed totally legally every year in the u.s. - some of which in the case of say sport hunting are tortured for humans pleasure in a way not disimilar to dog fighting - the government itself kills shitloads of dogs just so they wont wander the streets - most people eat meat and it wouldve been basically a big joke if vick had been caught running a cock fighting ring
dogs are admittedly special in their ability to connect w/humans but not in their capacity to feel pain and suffer - what vick did was some dark awful shit for sure but unless the country comes to grips w/the dark awful way animals in are treated across the board punishing dog abusers isnt justice its fetish - the system perpetrated a hypocritical act in locking this guy up
b. the u.s. incarcerates way too many people - its become a cultural bias - people im sure who generally recognize this fact still longed for vicks imprisonment - we have a problem - their are other ways to deal w/people who do things you dont like than just throwing them away
http://grab.by/87Lb
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:09 (fifteen years ago)
i dunno, he was prosecuted under rico
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:12 (fifteen years ago)
the real problem is that iceland should incarcerate way more people
― buzza, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:14 (fifteen years ago)
yah, he was transporting dogs across state lines for the purpose of gambling on watching them kill each other.no matter how u spin that, it's immensely fucked upand saying "the whole damn system is out of order" does not excuse me having to hear the phrase "rape stand"
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:14 (fifteen years ago)
i mean i guess they used rico as a tool to get him to submit a plea--maybe that's a misuse of rico, i really can't disagree with him being incarcerated tho
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:15 (fifteen years ago)
― CaptainLorax, Thursday, August 20, 2009 1:44 PM (1 year ago) Bookmark
― once more Jagger faps the hivemind (symsymsym), Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:17 (fifteen years ago)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
― max, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:18 (fifteen years ago)
justice isnt justice unless its applied evenly, unless theres an actual spirit of the law operating, not just people reacting to their own sense of disgust or whatever - also just to open up the floor to a derail rico is a pretty fucked up set of laws which has directly lead to some of that huge lead in incarceration
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:18 (fifteen years ago)
i really can't disagree with him being incarcerated tho
― call all destroyer, Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:15 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
no one really gives a fuck if anyone goes to jail in america
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:21 (fifteen years ago)
theres a good yo gotti song called 'rico' i recommend it
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:21 (fifteen years ago)
― ice cr?m, Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:21 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i mean, no? it was a serious and long-running crime.
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:25 (fifteen years ago)
i guess you are saying that running an organized dog fighting ring is equivalent to a bunch of other things that happen in america--i'm not really sure abt that.
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:27 (fifteen years ago)
aint no uzis made in harlem. not one of us in here owns a poppy field.
― max, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:28 (fifteen years ago)
everything that people are sent to prison for is considered a serious crime by lots of people - and now we have a prison population three times per capita of the next largest in the developed world - this is what im talking abt when i call it a cultural bias - americans think its totally reasonable to lock people up for a wider range of offenses than people in other countries - and generally when you call them on it they go huh what he did a bad thing
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:30 (fifteen years ago)
so what happens to ppl in iceland or ireland who are caught running a dogfighting ring?
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:31 (fifteen years ago)
im guessing not sent to jail
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:32 (fifteen years ago)
so im saying to recap
a. running an organized dog fighting ring is roughly equivalent to a bunch of other legal things that happen in america
b. we have to somehow back away from our knee jerk imprisonment habit
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:33 (fifteen years ago)
there are lots of ways to relate w/people who have committed minor to middling crimes who arent much imminent threat to anyone w/o imprisoning them - our prison population is indicative of a barbaric lack of imagination and a failure of compassion - basically we just do not want to deal
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:36 (fifteen years ago)
they eat dogs in other countries around the world fyi
― dayo, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:39 (fifteen years ago)
^^^i'm sure this is true--i'm not sure any country is successful in treating crimes this way.
in the uk if you are caught with fighting dogs you get a 1500-pound fine and you are barred from owning dogs.
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:39 (fifteen years ago)
xp to icey
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:40 (fifteen years ago)
i feel where you're coming from here cram. was particularly incensed by marion jones' prison story; there was no reason for her to do prison time except to show off federal powerfeel like a more appropriate thing for vick would've been for him to not go to jail, but to be heavily, heavily fined and banned from nfl play for life.
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:42 (fifteen years ago)
Comparing deer hunting to what Vick did is challoosy horseshit.
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:42 (fifteen years ago)
totally disagree with taking away his livelihood as an acceptable punishment
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:43 (fifteen years ago)
icey btw this argument is much better used in the service of various drug offenses
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:45 (fifteen years ago)
how about the raising of pigs and cattle xxp
― dayo, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:45 (fifteen years ago)
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:42 AM (19 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
hunting for food im not arguing with, for sport go ahead and explain to me how its not inflicting suffering on animals for human amusement, note tho that im not advocating imprisoning hunters
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:45 (fifteen years ago)
Dude would drown dogs and take bets on which would die first. This was serial-killer-in-training shit.
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:46 (fifteen years ago)
whatever, the fact that how cattle and pigs are raised is fucked up actually has nothing to do with anything
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:48 (fifteen years ago)
im sure bets have never been made between hunters
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:48 (fifteen years ago)
― call all destroyer, Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:45 AM (32 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
drug offenses, dog fighting, financial crimes, whatever - im deeply suspicious of imprisoning people who are not a clear threat to other people
change the standards for how those animals are raised, don't relax punishment for a dog fighter!
that's not my point - more feeding into icey's argument that the same type of behavior vick was sent to jail for is, more or less, roughly sanctioned in other contexts
― dayo, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:50 (fifteen years ago)
Financial criminals are some of the biggest threats around wtf
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:51 (fifteen years ago)
icey i'm sympathetic to that but my point in posting the uk punishment was that it would be no deterrent to someone like vick--maybe it's fucked up but i do sort of see the value in incarcerating ppl, esp. ppl of means, who are arrogant enough to think that they would never be incarcerated for the particular crimes they were committing.
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:51 (fifteen years ago)
ok dayo then fix those contexts! that's all i'm saying.
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:51 AM (20 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
theyre not threats once you catch them and ban them from fucking w/finance
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:52 (fifteen years ago)
"totally disagree with taking away his livelihood as an acceptable punishment"saying that this should've been the NFL's stance in lieu of prison time, not the feds! and maybe a three year suspension would've worked.but yah, we clearly over incarcerate as a nation and it's not a system that works
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:53 (fifteen years ago)
I hear ya cad - but there IS some hypocrisy in getting up in arms about what vick did and then turning around and enjoying a nice ribeye
― dayo, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:53 (fifteen years ago)
― call all destroyer, Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:51 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
thats a reasonable idea but until those contexts are fixed dog fighting laws are unjust in comparison, and we are nowhere near fixing those contexts
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:54 (fifteen years ago)
in any case, reading the first 50 messages and last 50 messages of this thread is a sobering reminder of how time can change perspectives
― it Terribel !!! (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:55 (fifteen years ago)
xxp eh i don't really give a shit that his career made him rich/famous, that sets a weird precedent imo--it would be super hypocritical for him to be banned from pro football.
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:55 (fifteen years ago)
this thread needs more bill magill
― max, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:55 (fifteen years ago)
― ice cr?m, Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:54 AM (54 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
ok yeah i get this--it's v. challenging either way--i mean what would you find to be a valid punishment for vick?
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:56 (fifteen years ago)
Sorry about all your money being stolen, but you'll be glad to know the criminal responsible has been banned from financial dealings!
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:58 (fifteen years ago)
yeah thats why we dont let victims dictate sentaces
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 06:01 (fifteen years ago)
some sort of fine/education/probation/community service/dog owning ban mix seems appropriate - and of course the nfl will do as it does - id be curious to see what their punishment wouldve been had vick not served time xp
tucker carlson didnt want to imprison vick either
― max, Thursday, 30 December 2010 06:05 (fifteen years ago)
tucker should be allowed to execute vick himself, but he has to do it w/his bare hands locked in a room w/vick, and vick is allowed to execute tucker too
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 06:06 (fifteen years ago)
― dayo, Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:39 AM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark
heh well okay then.
― Princess TamTam, Thursday, 30 December 2010 06:32 (fifteen years ago)
chinese ppl are the most disgusting savages in the world imo iirc
― dayo, Thursday, 30 December 2010 06:33 (fifteen years ago)
― ice cr?m, Thursday, December 30, 2010 12:45 AM (46 minutes ago) Bookmark
deer are giant rats and because so many of their natural predators have been wiped out it's an absolute necessity to allow deer to be hunted - this is indisputable - hunters in america are the equivalent of semi-feral cats in a barn
the u.s. prison system is one of the most barbaric institutions in the entire world, but vick was jailed for conspiracy not for killing his gf's dog in a fit of rage - criminal masterminds getting a few months in the clink isnt really a tragedy
― Princess TamTam, Thursday, 30 December 2010 06:39 (fifteen years ago)
lol criminal mastermind, vick was jailed for killing dogs, rico was just the tool
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 06:42 (fifteen years ago)
and yeah thats cool deer are rats dogs are rats whatevs
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 06:43 (fifteen years ago)
lol dogs arent rats, dogs dont pose a threat to billions of dollars worth of agriculture in this country, get real faggot
― Princess TamTam, Thursday, 30 December 2010 06:45 (fifteen years ago)
i mean... get real... jerk...
― Princess TamTam, Thursday, 30 December 2010 06:46 (fifteen years ago)
dogs pose a threat to billions of dollars in dog fighting proceeds
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 06:47 (fifteen years ago)
http://i54.tinypic.com/scb0wi.gif
― markers, Thursday, 30 December 2010 06:47 (fifteen years ago)
i eat greyhounds that can't cut it at the track anymore
― buzza, Thursday, 30 December 2010 06:57 (fifteen years ago)
they are kinda lean and stringy, try a dog w more fat next time
― dayo, Thursday, 30 December 2010 06:58 (fifteen years ago)
is this what we've come to america? swapping dog recipes? this is what happens when you let notably handsome Iggles quarterback Michael Vick lead the team to the playoffs. it's all downhill ethics from here.
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 07:01 (fifteen years ago)
are we really comparing a complex intertwined dogfighting ring with animal torture to hunting?
here's a hint -- hunting's legal, and generally if you're a good shot, the animals don't suffer anywhere near as much as a DOG THAT YOU ELECTROCUTE OR SUFFOCATE UNDERWATER.
somea ya'll are acting like Vick served 25 in the clink and came out a grandpa
― yelawolfenstein (San Te), Thursday, 30 December 2010 13:13 (fifteen years ago)
Guys guys come one, obviously Vick just shot a few puppies a nasty look, where's the crime in that?
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 30 December 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)
drug offenses, dog fighting, financial crimes, whatever - im deeply suspicious of imprisoning people who are not a clear threat to other people― ice cr?m, Wednesday, December 29, 2010 11:48 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, December 29, 2010 11:48 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
yup
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, December 30, 2010 9:14 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i cant tell if you think being disingenuous is scoring you points or if you just genuinely have the worst reading comprehension of all time
― max, Thursday, 30 December 2010 15:49 (fifteen years ago)
Jesus you self-serious people have absolutely no radar for sarcasm do you?
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 30 December 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)
yeah i guess thats my problem, self-seriousness
― max, Thursday, 30 December 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)
It's more that attempting to have a serious conversation with someone being a glib ass is frustrating and unpleasant.
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Thursday, 30 December 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)
Dude I tried being serious yesterday and was roundly dismissed, its not worth it! I was trying to throw in a jokey post to lighten things up a little. But, since you brought it up, its pretty fucking infuriating that every other goddamn thread on this board is full of glib "zings" and tossed off sarcasm, but suddenly I'm called out for it?
― one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)
Have you never actually seen me interact with some of the people you are talking to ITT
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)
Like, I tell many of these ppl to stfu and stop being ducks regularly. Welcome to their esteemed company!
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:02 (fifteen years ago)
*quacks*
― max, Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:02 (fifteen years ago)
Also I hate my phone
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)
Is it possible to think Mike Vick's sentence was deserved and simultaneously think he should be beyond persecution at this point (but not above criticism)?
― yelawolfenstein (San Te), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)
vick killed dogs, probably will be named come back player of the year in the nfl. I love america.
― but it could have happened when i was playing tesla (chrisv2010), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)
granted he's really done wonders for my fantasy team.
This is how I feel, so... yes?
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)
"Is it possible to think Mike Vick's sentence was deserved and simultaneously think he should be beyond persecution at this point (but not above criticism)?"
What are we defining persecution as again?
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)
Idk, harassment, picketing, etc. Not saying he's even being persecuted really, but just seems that some in this thread think he should be, which idg
― yelawolfenstein (San Te), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:14 (fifteen years ago)
― yelawolfenstein (San Te), Thursday, December 30, 2010 8:13 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
lool is this really yr argument, what if youre not a good shot then is it like electrocution or 'drowning'
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
No, it still isn't. My point was that I am not naïve enough to think hunted animals don't suffer, especially if they don't die right away, but it's still a far cry from the torture described above. Plus when you hunt you aren't fucking shooting at domesticated animals sold/bred as pets. Not even remotely equatable.
― yelawolfenstein (San Te), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
deer are basically domesticated at this point
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:41 (fifteen years ago)
yeah of course not they are pets therefor special, go directly to jail
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
id be curious to see yr animal suffering matrix too
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah I can't imagine why people would feel differently about animals kept as pets and animals not kept as pets. So illogical.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:02 (40 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― max, Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:02 (39 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:03 (38 minutes ago) Bookmark
lol
― Rockcrit from the Tuoms (nakhchivan), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)
how much more does a instantly electrocuted dog suffer than a deer shot in its leg and left to bleed out in the freezing woods, then whats the formula you use to translate that to a prison sentence
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:45 (fifteen years ago)
Didn't Dennis Perrin make this stupid "people who eat animals are hypocrites about not wanting to see Michael Vick kill dogs" argument already?
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)
Ice, ever consider that laws exist to protect those animals deemed legal pets, similar to how laws protect humans?
Hell hunting even has 'laws' and regulation
― yelawolfenstein (San Te), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)
yes and im questioning the validity of pet protection laws in the light of the suffering reined down upon animals in general - including btw pets who are euthanized en mass by the government
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah I can't imagine why people would feel differently about animals kept as pets and animals not kept as pets. So illogical.― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, December 30, 2010 10:43 AM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, December 30, 2010 10:43 AM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark
well the point is that it ~is~ actually "illogical." it is understandable, it's ok, but don't pretend that it's, like, rational.
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)
why is this happening
I can't even tell who is trolling whom
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)
alex feel free to refute the argument if you feel its so stupid, or you could just tie me to yr fav morbs guilt by association punching bag whatevs
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)
people who torture animals are bad imo
― moholy-nagl (history mayne), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)
― ice cr?m, Wednesday, December 29, 2010 11:33 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)
"yes and im questioning the validity of pet protection laws in the light of the suffering reined down upon animals in general"
So basically you are arguing that all animals should suffer. I for one am looking forward to the return of bull and bear fighting.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:52 (fifteen years ago)
like i think that torturing to death animals is vile and cruel, and yet i feel okay with 'sport hunting,' but i understand that in a larger, moral, sense, that's a fallacy. yr still killing sentient creatures for yr pleasure
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:53 (fifteen years ago)
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, December 30, 2010 10:52 AM (52 seconds ago) Bookmark
lol what
"we have to somehow back away from our knee jerk imprisonment habit"
I actually I agree with this.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)
im not suggesting vick should be given a high five and a puppy - id like our laws to be consistant - and for there to be less people in prison - id like animals to be treated better altogether - not just cute pets
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:55 (fifteen years ago)
I think we can all agree we'd like animals to be treated better and we'd like less people to be put in prison.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:56 (fifteen years ago)
let's not jump to conclusions; this is ILX after all
― Indolence Mission (DJP), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)
heres a little thought experiment - what do you think wouldve happened to michael vick if hed been caught leading a cock fighting ring
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)
i think, in the context of this thread, that's sorta the take-home. dog torturing might lay bare an intentional cruelty that might be absent from sport hunting (or unacknowledged), but it's still animals dying for human entertainment. but mike vick is a monster and a guy in southern minnesota is just a bad shot.
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)
"heres a little thought experiment - what do you think wouldve happened to michael vick if hed been caught leading a cock fighting ring"
A lot of "hilarious" newspaper headlines would have resulted?
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)
haha well that's true
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)
Being that cockfighting is a felony in 33 states, illegal in fifty, and punishable by up to three years in prison, I'd say if he ran a similar ring with roosters instead of dogs he may have served a similar sentence
― yelawolfenstein (San Te), Thursday, 30 December 2010 17:02 (fifteen years ago)
Probably wouldn't have been a SI cover story though on "WHERE ARE THESE COCKS NOW?" though.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 17:02 (fifteen years ago)
though
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 17:03 (fifteen years ago)
i dont think dog fighting and sport hunting are exactly morally equivalent, dog fighting is grosser, but there is a level of similarity for sure
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 17:03 (fifteen years ago)
the only valid argument that i can think of for why dog fighting is somehow ~inherently~ worse than, say, bear fighting or cock fighting, is that in breeding dogs as companions we have assumed a responsibility that is absent in our relationships with the rest of god's creatures. i can sorta get with that, but i'm still not entirely convinced that violating that responsibility merits the sort of hard time we're willing to hand down to ppl
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 17:03 (fifteen years ago)
yeah i guess i don't see them as exactly morally equivalent either, but i'm struggling to tease out whether or not i'm right
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)
also i'm willing to bet that cock fighting's legal status has less to do with ppl giving a shit about rooster welfare and more to do with gambling
i doubt vick wouldve done time for fighting cocks regardless of its feloniousness (in 2/3 states!) - and yeah it wouldve been a big hilarious joke - ron mexico 2.0
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)
gambling should be legal too, who doesnt love to gamble!
argument is getting kinda silly now
― predeep natsvitika (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 30 December 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)
frankly if i was a chicken i'd rather go out in the ring than get my beak seared off and spend a short life in a horrible concentration camp, mired in my own shit
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 17:07 (fifteen years ago)
well roosters are usually just eliminated at birth
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 17:07 (fifteen years ago)
~exactly~
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 17:08 (fifteen years ago)
way XP but Bull fighting is actually a great corollary to the Vick case, I think, since you may not be happy that it goes on, but I don't think people assume all matadors are secret sociopaths in training. And they do terrible terrible things to animals.
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)
I dunno, I think most bullfighting types would invoke such things as cultural heritage and regional tradition and um, art as justification, and then you've got that macho shit about the matador putting himself in immediate danger and all the adulation they get from the crowd and whatnot. So although the basic animal suffering is obvious to an outsider, you can sort of see how it might get a little buried as a consideration to those that have grown up with it. Plus bovines don't have that privileged pet status that dogs do and most western folks are happy to have someone kill a cow on their behalf on the reg. Dog fighting seems to exist in a zone where you actively have to dismiss giving a shit about the dogs from the start instead of just rolling with your basic cultural prejudices.
― O Permaban (NickB), Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)
Vick saw his first dogfight when he was seven. If we're talking about regional tradition, it was certainly a normative practice for him.
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:15 (fifteen years ago)
pitbulls were in fact bred to fight each other after mastiff/bear fights were outlawed
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:19 (fifteen years ago)
Plenty of dogs were originally bred to do things which they are no longer doing.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:23 (fifteen years ago)
yeah im just sayin as far as traditions it is an ongoing one, which personally doesnt hold a lot of sway w/me but whatevs
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:29 (fifteen years ago)
"Vick saw his first dogfight when he was seven. If we're talking about regional tradition, it was certainly a normative practice for him."
I'm pretty sure Michael Vick was also aware it was illegal.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)
Which is gross as it is, bullfighting is not in whatever fucked up places they still have bullfights.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, December 30, 2010 1:31 PM (29 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
well prob not at seven
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)
Uh, yeah? And he plead guilty to doing it. I'm pointing out the ethical bias, not the legal one.
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)
Unless your point is that dogfighting is ethically worse than bullfighting because it's illegal, in which case I'd point out that there are a lot of laws enshrined in this country and others that I think are morally abhorrent and yet that changes nothing re their legality. They are two separate issues. (Nb I am not saying I find dogfighting laws morally abhorrent)
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:34 (fifteen years ago)
The ethics/legality/cultural norms arguments are kinda giving me a headache here.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)
generally people equate legal and moral issues when its convenient to them, and break the law when its not
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:40 (fifteen years ago)
Essentially to the question of: Does dogfighting make Michael Vick a sociopath? I think you have to ask whether practices that are disturbing to me (and you) but normative in the culture in which they occur (and this is a host of activities ranging from clitoridectomies to bullfighting to whatever have you) are indicative of someone in that culture being a sociopath. First of all, psychological profiles are pretty culturally mediated anyway. Second of all, if it is culturally normative, even if it's disgusting to me and illegal, it probably does not indicate sociopathy. I think the issue here is mostly people who have trouble separating their reactions (also culturally mediated) from Vick's (or whoever else). Which is okay, cause we all have trouble doing that and we shouldn't give up feeling disgusted by it. But we should also be intelligent enough human beings to be like, "That is sick and I think it should be illegal and maybe even punished to dissuade from other people doing it" and not add on "It means you're a sociopath!!!!!" (File under this all kinds of crazy stuff actually. Refusing to see a doctor if you're a Christian scientist comes to mind.)
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:42 (fifteen years ago)
Hopefully this ^^ doesn't give you a bigger headache, but I think it lays out what the major point of contention is.
There is no god.
You should be able to abort children up to 30 years old.
Processed food is tasty.
― Jeff, Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)
Viva Chavez.
hay now
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:44 (fifteen years ago)
This kind of situational awareness is really important when studying history, otherwise the entire Western world at one point was sociopathic for keeping slaves. Or all of Germany was sociopathic for letting the Holocaust occur. Undoubtedly there were slaveowners who within the context of their era behaved in ways that would indicate sociopathy and there's a great psychological treatment of the Nuremberg Trials which suggests that major Nazis were pretty insane (sociopathic but also lots of other serious issues including paranoia, schizophrenia, etc).
It occurs to me tho that calling Vick (or anyone) a sociopath is really just a way of more strenuously signaling your disgust at his actions. You're obviously not offering a psychological profile of him and probably have no expertise to diagnose him anyway. So really who cares? If you're really really really disgusted by him instead of just really disgusted by him, I guess you're entitled.
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:48 (fifteen years ago)
(Nb, not saying every person in Western society kept slaves, just trying to make a point about a far-reaching abhorrent practice that doesn't indicate sociopathy.)
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)
yeah i think its also a way to just paint him as abhorrent and move on, rather than trying to understand wtf is goin on
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 18:51 (fifteen years ago)
mordy otm
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Thursday, 30 December 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)
yeah
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
Now that we've solved these problems is it to think that Chris Brown is a sociopath? Just want to ask cuz I've been considering calling him one on another thread and I want to test the waters as far as what kind of clusterfuck that might cause.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)
anyone that would jack up rihanna is obv a sociopath
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)
In regard to whether Vick is a "sociopath", Mordy has a valid point. Not every criminal act is sociopathic, even if it inflicts needless pain. But Vick's actions clearly weren't normative behavior within his social context, either. Otherwise it wouldn't have been illegal - which is kind of a big indicator that society considers what he did a trangression of the desired norm. He knew he was participating in a criminal enterprise and chose to do it anyway.
― Aimless, Thursday, 30 December 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)
There are normative behaviors that are criminal, fyi. Marijuana use the most prominent of which.
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)
I don't live where Vick grew up, but if he saw his first dog fight when he was seven I'm willing to say that particular illegal behavior was normative in his community. I've never seen or heard about a dog fight happening where I live and I'm twenty-six. It was certainly way more normative in his community than in mine.
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 16:45 (3 hours ago) Permalink
Vick, or his employees, would pry out all of the teeth of the female dogs so they wouldn't be able to bite while they were being gang raped by the dogs he'd tortured into psychosis.
Not the same as hunting.
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)
I feel totally secure labeling anyone who uses marijuana a sociopath. Especially that stoned fucker who ate my last Cup O' Noodles in college.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)
Marijuana use is normative within a very large subculture, but not within society generally. also note word: "indicator", as above. I am aware that not every law represents a social norm, but laws are generally good indicators of what society considers a transgression.
― Aimless, Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)
Vick, or his employees, would pry out all of the teeth of the female dogs so they wouldn't be able to bite while they were being gang raped by the dogs he'd tortured into psychosis.Not the same as hunting.― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:02 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:02 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark
obv thats disgusting and horrible, but i think yr sorta missing the point.
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)
Can I say agree that it's not the same as hunting for sport while at the same time saying the I find hunting for sport pretty grotesque as well?
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)
its not the same but its similar
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)
Okay...
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
i think icey's point about the similarities wasn't to say that dog fighting is ok or w/e, but more of a food for thought type ish---we walk around all day thinking that it's perfectly reasonable to lock up the vicks of the world for years at a time and then go buy hunting licenses and processed meat and feel self-righteous about our opinions, when its basically just insane to do that
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)
~challengin yr perceptions~
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah really making us all think.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)
All of us ILX hunters and hot dog eaters.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)
stick w/me u guys
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)
tamtam eats dog iirc
All of us ILX hunters and hot dog eaters.― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:20 PM (48 seconds ago) Bookmark
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:20 PM (48 seconds ago) Bookmark
missing the point on purpose
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah sorry maybe you didn't explain it good.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)
i would say the well regulated raising of meat animals, subsistence hunting, and required population control hunting are not necessarily wantonly cruel, while i would say dogfighting, bullfighting, trophy hunting, and hunting solely to preserve "traditions" is wantonly cruel.
― rhymes with a$$ange (Hunt3r), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)
are
if factory farming isnt wantonly cruel its at least completely indifferent to the suffering of animals
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)
yes, the key is "necessarily."
― rhymes with a$$ange (Hunt3r), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)
Factory farming is wantonly cruel! Fuck You, Smithfield Foods.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)
*eats hot dog*
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)
sure, i guess the question is whether or not the explicit cruelty of those things merits the legal penalties we currently impose. like how exactly did society benefit from vick's two years in prison, aside from enjoying the warmth of self-righteousness?
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)
Wait is this an argument about how lame our correctional system is? I'm so confused.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)
this is abt everything, man
― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)
which, if alex needs more help, is what icey's point was upthread---we feel totally comfortable handing down harsh sentences for dogfighting and feel justified doing so, but the divide between the wanton cruelty of dogfighting and the indifferent cruelty of factory farming isn't ~that~ wide.
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)
That should have been title of his reality show: Michael Vick: It's About Everything
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)
i think the morality or legitimacy of vick's punishment is distinct from the morality or legitimacy of the illegality of dog fighting and/or operating a gambling ring. xpost to gbx
― rhymes with a$$ange (Hunt3r), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:31 (fifteen years ago)
xp Well the level of participation is clearly different.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)
part of confronting the lamitude of our correctional system requires, in this case, recognizing the similarities between normal quotidian animal cruelty and the kind vick was engaged in. saying 'well yeah but dogfighting is just not the same as hunting' encourages the same sorta reductive moral outsourcing that lands small time drug dealers in the clink for a decade and child molesters getting murdered in jail and ppl shrugging like it aint a thing
imo
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
Okay so now we are talking about dog-fighting and hunting. Way to switch horses in midstream.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)
i think the morality or legitimacy of vick's punishment is distinct from the morality or legitimacy of the illegality of dog fighting and/or operating a gambling ring. xpost to gbx― rhymes with a$$ange (Hunt3r), Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:31 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark
― rhymes with a$$ange (Hunt3r), Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:31 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark
totally. but some of the commentators in this thread didn't see it that way, i dont think
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)
is snarky middle-schooler yr only rhetorical mode, alex?
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:36 (fifteen years ago)
when society as a whole recognize your group's concept of morality and legislate accordingly, well, that's the story of civilizations i guess. i mean, you could go all peta, or all fred phelps, or all john brown. it can get pretty dicey. xpost but i cant even tell to whom.
― rhymes with a$$ange (Hunt3r), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
like, if yr trying to convince someone that vick probably didn't need to be in jail that long (even though his crimes were gross), it doesnt hurt to point out that what he did isn't all that different, in a moral or ethical sense, from stuff normals do every day. what's hard to understand about that?
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
Because that's point is basically bullshit.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
use your words
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
srsly at least do me the courtesy of explaining yrself
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)
Eating a hot dog is not morally or ethically similar to operating a dog fighting ring.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:42 (fifteen years ago)
Not sure what else "normals do every day" that you could be talking about.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)
making a statement is not the same as giving an explanation
try again!
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, December 30, 2010 Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:46 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/12/20/ap/strange/main7168033.shtml
for your consideration: what is the normal way to hunt a bear in colorado (a local story in the news here recently)?
― rhymes with a$$ange (Hunt3r), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:42 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
youre right -- far more animals suffer daily from american agrobusiness than have ever suffered in dogfighting rings in the united states
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:50 (fifteen years ago)
xp a sport hunters level of participation is precisely the same
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:51 (fifteen years ago)
Shooting a sleeping bear totally gives you an unfair advantage. Mind you, so does using a gun.
― O Permaban (NickB), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)
what was madden's quote about hunting- how is it a sport when one side doesn't know it's playing?
― end aggro business now (Hunt3r), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
"xp a sport hunters level of participation is precisely the same"
Yeah see I missed where most normal people are sport hunters.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)
"youre right -- far more animals suffer daily from american agrobusiness than have ever suffered in dogfighting rings in the united states"
Totally true. Fuck You, Smithfield Foods.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:58 (fifteen years ago)
I've been mulling over (and over) going out to dinner with a family friend this weekend, who chose to wear fur (she knew, or should know after 2 years, that I'm vegan). I want to mailbomb her with copies of Earthlings, and am rehearsing this L'esprit de l'escalier scenario wherein I told her: "While you may be ignorant of conditions on fur farms, I'M NOT...digresion on animals skinned alive etc." I know that all of this would be counter productive, but I still want to punch something...
― Yours sincerely, Bad Poetry (Sanpaku), Thursday, 30 December 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)
Seriously, how do other animal friends hereabouts calm/placate themselves when seeing friends/relatives abuse animals indirectly? I'd just about avoid this person indefinitely if it weren't for a shortage of companions in this city...
― Yours sincerely, Bad Poetry (Sanpaku), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah see I missed where most normal people are sport hunters.― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:57 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:57 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark
dude i know its fun and easy to pretend we dont exist, but here in middle america, in my v liberal city, sport hunting is a totally normal thing. not everyone does it, but many ppl at least know someone who's a hunter.
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:05 (fifteen years ago)
Oh so if I know someone that's basically morally equivalent to operating a dog-fighting ring.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, December 30, 2010 2:36 PM (32 minutes ago) Bookmark
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)
Also I'm pretty sure the percentages of people with hunting licenses is pretty low nationwide.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)
wtf is yr point
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:10 (fifteen years ago)
its like yr arguing with me just because
Is this your only point, that these two things are not the same as each other? Because I don't see anyone making the case that they're the exact same thing as each other.
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:12 (fifteen years ago)
Some people are arguing that there's a lot of animal cruelty in our culture that is pretty much ignored while the (admittedly heinous) act of dogfighting is prosecuted and probably because of stuff like race/class/culture. If your point is that dogfighting is not the same as farming animals for food or hunting bears then you're not really dealing with the argument on any level, unless the level is "hunting isn't a problem at all."
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)
again, the only 'point' here is that eating hotdogs and hunting are not that far removed from dogfighting, and that accepting that, accepting yr own complicity in other horrible shit, might be instructive and/or beneficial to society inasmuch as it might mean a more sane approach to how we sentence ppl
xp mordy otm
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:14 (fifteen years ago)
My basic point is that this "we are all just like Michael Vick if we really look at our own animal murdering lives doesn't it make you think" thing is nonsense. There is no equivalent in most people's day-to-day lives with his actions and again for most people there is no hypocrisy in finding his actions totally repellent.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:15 (fifteen years ago)
how is it nonsense! you keep leaving that part out!
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:16 (fifteen years ago)
I think it's good for people to examine how they contribute to negative cultures, even if they aren't participating in the most disgusting forms of those cultures.
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)
"Some people are arguing that there's a lot of animal cruelty in our culture that is pretty much ignored while the (admittedly heinous) act of dogfighting is prosecuted and probably because of stuff like race/class/culture."
Okay so is Michael Vick really the best example of this? I mean I'm not saying that this is wrong (honestly I don't know how often dog-fighting rings are busted and/or how aggressively they are prosecuted and I would be interested in the stats) but I think the main reason why Michael Vick was singled out is because he is really famous. I guess that sucks for him, but at the end of the day he's still really rich so....
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:19 (fifteen years ago)
Although I guess he wouldn't be rich if some people had their way and he wasn't allowed to play in the NFL or have BET reality shows so...
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:21 (fifteen years ago)
"how is it nonsense! you keep leaving that part out!"
There is no equivalent in most people's day-to-day lives with his actions and again for most people there is no hypocrisy in finding his actions totally repellent.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:22 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think anyone is calling anyone a hypocrite for finding his actions repellent. That's just a strawman.
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:22 (fifteen years ago)
Actually Dennis Perrin was way above, but hopefully we can all agree he's an idiot.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:24 (fifteen years ago)
xp right, exactly. no one's saying that you should feel like a monster for eating meat or w/e, just that examining precisely how dogfighting and other forms of 'acceptable' cruelty are related to each other is probably a worthwhile or instructive activity. you can still eat meat and w/e, but doing so does put you on the same spectrum as vick. yr more removed, but at the end of the day, something horrible happens to a sentient creature who is capable of suffering, and you had a hand in it.
which, to me, at least, seems like a way to investigate why it is we decided to nail vick as hard as we did, and what that means
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:24 (fifteen years ago)
Except Morbius, of course.
i had lamb for lunch, btw
youre off my madden squad
― end aggro business now (Hunt3r), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)
its cool, i throw like a girl anyway
― kanellos (gbx), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:29 (fifteen years ago)
"seems like a way to investigate why it is we decided to nail vick as hard as we did, and what that means"
It definitely means the Federal Government does love making high profile examples of people.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:30 (fifteen years ago)
i'm playing madden at this very second with vick and anyone who plays as the iggles and doesn't play him is doing themselves a huge disservice
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:31 (fifteen years ago)
Anyone who plays the iggles at Madden is horrible person though.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:32 (fifteen years ago)
or an iggles fan
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:32 (fifteen years ago)
Same diff.
if you weigh the inequity of vick being in prison while ted nugent walks around free, it probably does less harm to society than giving vick a pass (and I suspect in many ways, he got a pass anyway).
― Philip Nunez, Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:33 (fifteen years ago)
I think we investigate why it is we decided not to nail Ted Nugent as hard as we could have, and what that means.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)
vick you, michael fuck
― old man yells at cloud computing (am0n), Thursday, 30 December 2010 22:00 (fifteen years ago)
With all this talk about meat I read "Ted Nugent" as "Ted Nugget". In any case I'm a veg but when you eat meat you're not supposed to beat up an animal for hours or tear its skin off. I understand animal activists feel differently, but with dogfighting the violence is entertainment.
― toni mitchell (u s steel), Thursday, 30 December 2010 22:18 (fifteen years ago)
lolol @ bill magill upthread
― old man yells at cloud computing (am0n), Thursday, 30 December 2010 22:25 (fifteen years ago)
Is he still around? With that screen name, I mean.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 22:31 (fifteen years ago)
wheres the thread where bill magill brings up paying for prostitutes
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Thursday, 30 December 2010 22:39 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah that's important shit, better find it.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 22:42 (fifteen years ago)
this thread is all about how draining sarcasm from your posts would make them right
― lyrics is weak ... like clock radio similes (deej), Thursday, 30 December 2010 22:49 (fifteen years ago)
Fine it's on the Ever Been With A Prostitute thread.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 22:57 (fifteen years ago)
― Mordy, Thursday, December 30, 2010 9:22 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
the system perpetrated a hypocritical act in locking this guy up― ice cr?m, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:09 (17 hours ago)
there IS some hypocrisy in getting up in arms about what vick did and then turning around and enjoying a nice ribeye
― dayo, Thursday, December 30, 2010 5:53 AM (17 hours ago) Bookmark
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 30 December 2010 23:06 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah but no one else.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 23:12 (fifteen years ago)
Vick basically took animal cruelty to the highest level possible, and dude got 2 years in prison. It's not like he got the death penalty while hunters get parades and free blowjob machines.
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 30 December 2010 23:14 (fifteen years ago)
Jeez what do you crazy puritans have against blowjob machines. They aren't a big deal. Get over it.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Thursday, 30 December 2010 23:18 (fifteen years ago)
okay, so apparently some people are arguing that. it's a silly argument.
― Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 23:30 (fifteen years ago)
christ this thread is full of extremes.
I think what Vick did was wrong, and the punishment was fitting, but on the other hand I too don't agree that 'illegality' equates directly to morality (my point about the hunting being 'legal' was to point out Vick was aware of the laws he was breaking).
I think what he did was heinous but I think he paid his debt in jail. I wouldn't rush to call him a sociopath, and just feel dude should be able to get on with his life. What's wif so many of y'all talking past each other?
― O'Shea the Cubeman (San Te), Thursday, 30 December 2010 23:48 (fifteen years ago)
many xps, but I'm aware of very little 'sport hunting' where the meat isn't eaten - even when it's coyotes and prairie dogs, you're dealing with predator and vermin control. Not saying there isn't pure bloodsport hunting... but it's much rarer than people with little experience with hunting or firearms tend to assume. Even on bullshit white hunter African safaris, the game-meat is generally shared with local people, AFAIK.
― boots get knocked from here to czechoslovakier (milo z), Friday, 31 December 2010 01:15 (fifteen years ago)
he was bein sarcastic.
― ullr saves (gbx), Friday, 31 December 2010 01:20 (fifteen years ago)
Are bears normally eaten or what?
― O Permaban (NickB), Friday, 31 December 2010 01:24 (fifteen years ago)
mcdonald's tried implementing them into their dollar menu iirc
― O'Shea the Cubeman (San Te), Friday, 31 December 2010 01:45 (fifteen years ago)
really gotta give my congratulations to alex in sf itt
― dayo, Friday, 31 December 2010 02:00 (fifteen years ago)
Aww I'm kinda touched.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Friday, 31 December 2010 02:36 (fifteen years ago)
http://espn.go.com/videohub/video/clip?id=8210940&categoryid=2378529
go get a blog at the corner, dipshit
― Al S. Burr! (k3vin k.), Sunday, 29 July 2012 21:28 (thirteen years ago)
putting him back on my Madden Team
― LaRusso Auto (Neanderthal), Monday, 12 October 2020 16:15 (five years ago)