can we talk about MAD MEN on AMC?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mad_Men

there has only been one episode aired thus far however it is safe to say that I will go a step further than the NYer reviewer who merely wanted to marry the show: I want to take it behind the middle school and get it pregnant!!

johnny crunch, Monday, 23 July 2007 22:39 (eighteen years ago)

Is it really any good? I was vaguely interested but...AMC!

admrl, Monday, 23 July 2007 22:40 (eighteen years ago)

I know! the channel that shows independence day over and over again as a classic!

nevertheless...it was really tremendously good. give it a chance!

johnny crunch, Monday, 23 July 2007 22:42 (eighteen years ago)

Seems like it's trying to be the American Life on Mars, kinda.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 23 July 2007 22:44 (eighteen years ago)

everyones sexist, racist, smoking their asses off and drinking at their job, whats not to like? looks great too, a great-looking show this is

, Monday, 23 July 2007 22:45 (eighteen years ago)

I like things about ad men

admrl, Monday, 23 July 2007 22:46 (eighteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

Saw this show for the first time tonight. FANTASTIC.

Impeccable design, at least a few scenes as strong as prime-grade Sopranos.

I love that I don't recognize these actors at all, so they're just the characters to me.

Eazy, Friday, 10 August 2007 05:10 (eighteen years ago)

you guys are shitting me, right? I hate this show and the stupid ads where they pretend like they're so clever. The lead is so fucking stiff and everyone recites the dialogue like they're reading Shakespeare in high school. BOO

Dr. Superman, Friday, 10 August 2007 05:38 (eighteen years ago)

It's 1959, of course he's stiff! Get a drink or two in him and he loosens up, like the rest.

Eazy, Friday, 10 August 2007 05:41 (eighteen years ago)

i think it's a lot of fun. some of the "look how people used to behave" stuff is heavy-handed, but mostly it works, and it's balanced by the characters. it's a good era to look back at, right on the cusp of lots of things. and everything looks so good.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 10 August 2007 13:48 (eighteen years ago)

heard an interview w/ the creator on a re-run of "Fressshhhh Air" last night. It sounds like it could be pretty interesting and the guy did a damn fine job of describing/ selling his aesthetic. But the couple of clips they played sounded kinda blah.

Of course, what can you really tell from audio clips of a tv show? I'm sure bits from the Sopranos would sound just as blah over the radio, esp. if you weren't familiar with the show.

will, Friday, 10 August 2007 14:18 (eighteen years ago)

I really like this show.

Michael White, Friday, 10 August 2007 14:55 (eighteen years ago)

the couple of clips they played sounded kinda blah.

well there's not a lot of action or anything. mostly people sitting around talking. but it's interesting anyway. the idea is basically to sketch an era (from the perspectives of our own, of course), so every little scene contributes to the bigger picture. i like how ambitious it is -- they're angling to bring the nixon-kennedy race into the picture, and who knows what else. i'm definitely hooked enough to watch the whole first season. i hope there will be more.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 10 August 2007 15:03 (eighteen years ago)

well it wasn't so much the lack of action as the dialogue and delivery. But again, without actually seeing it I should reserve judgement.

will, Friday, 10 August 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)

i've seen one episode and it was impressive!

pretty amazing look at office life pre-feminism and pre-technology, it's like another planet.

gff, Friday, 10 August 2007 15:19 (eighteen years ago)

some of the "look how people used to behave" stuff is heavy-handed

I caught a bit of it and yeah this was a little off-putting, it seemed very self-satisfied, no subtlety.

pretty amazing look at office life pre-feminism and pre-technology, it's like another planet.

this made me think of Wilder's "The Apartment", which is probably 10x better than this will ever be...

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 10 August 2007 15:41 (eighteen years ago)

some of the "look how people used to behave" stuff is heavy-handed

this is kind of what I was thinking.

will, Friday, 10 August 2007 15:45 (eighteen years ago)

or I should say, what I could easily see happening.

I will refrain from posting any more on this thread until I've seen it.

will, Friday, 10 August 2007 15:48 (eighteen years ago)

the heavy-handedness is less off-putting if you consider the show as a kind of comedy, which i think it is (or at least a comic drama). those moments -- the pregnant mom smoking and drinking, the kids scrambling around the car without seatbelts, the casual anti-semitism -- are gags of a sort, and they're kind of funny.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 10 August 2007 16:04 (eighteen years ago)

(i mean, i laughed when the one guy smacked the other guy's kid, and the other guy's only response was to threaten to smack the kid again.)

tipsy mothra, Friday, 10 August 2007 16:05 (eighteen years ago)

I agree that such moments are intended as comedy, but to me they're a little too obvious and smug.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 10 August 2007 16:07 (eighteen years ago)

(by smug I mean that the comedy is rooted in having a feeling of superiority - primarily of an ethical and behavioral nature - over the characters. Its kinda mean and simplistic).

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 10 August 2007 16:10 (eighteen years ago)

Sopranos does the same thing with its characters - often having them doing/saying unbelievably stupid and/or cruel things to one another - but there the comic trick was subtler, because it was always offset by conscious efforts to make the characters as sympathetic as possible.

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 10 August 2007 16:11 (eighteen years ago)

i think the characters here have some depth and complexity. none of them are completely unsympathetic (except minor characters, like pete campbell's horrible father and the man from bethlehem steel). and presumably more of them will be fleshed out as it goes along. (the closeted graphic designer, e.g., is just a type right now but i'm guessing he'll get some episodes to himself.)

partly i like the similarities to far from heaven, because i kind of fantasized about following the characters in that movie over the next decade or so, seeing what happened to them as they went through the '60s, and this show has at least the potential for that. like, what will don draper's 7-year-old daughter be like as a 17-year-old in 1969?

also, i admit i'm mostly enjoying having a weekly show to watch again. i was never a sopranos watcher, so i've been bereft since the 4th season of the wire ended.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 10 August 2007 16:17 (eighteen years ago)

(i've only seen the first season of the sopranos, but it took a while for those characters to emerge as more than types too.)

tipsy mothra, Friday, 10 August 2007 16:19 (eighteen years ago)

what about the "don draper isn't who he says he is" storyline that's set to emerge? i would have thought that the show had enough dramatic possibility to work with without going into something like that.

lauren, Friday, 10 August 2007 16:34 (eighteen years ago)

the guy who plays draper kind of gave away the game on that one in one of the post-show interviews, didn't he? he said something about draper being from a real hardscrabble, orphaned background. i didn't get the sense he's so much "living a lie!!" or anything, just that he doesn't talk about it. but maybe there's more to it.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 10 August 2007 16:38 (eighteen years ago)

(draper would make sense as a G.I.-bill striver)

tipsy mothra, Friday, 10 August 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)

oh, no - there's definitely more to it. in the 2nd episode he was recognized on the train by an army buddy who called him by a different name, and in the preview for next week's ep someone from his past shows up exclaiming "i can't believe it. it's really you!" or words to that effect.

lauren, Friday, 10 August 2007 16:52 (eighteen years ago)

oh yeah i forgot that bit on the train. well hopefully they won't make it anything too stupid.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 10 August 2007 17:19 (eighteen years ago)

My prediction? Draper = Gatsby

Michael White, Friday, 10 August 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)

HE'S THE RUSSIAN FROM SOPRANOS

Oilyrags, Friday, 10 August 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)

All I know is that scenes like that one near the end about WWII-era guys drinking vs. Korea-era guys drinking is why I watch TV or read books or see plays, as much or more so than the plots.

And I thought the subtleties of the Bethlehem Steel pitch and the mock-ups worked well, too. The idea that the junior guy wasn't adding much to what was there already, but he came up with a word and metaphor, backbone, that convinced the guy.

And, come on, guys sitting around smoking and listening to a Bob Newhart record!

Eazy, Friday, 10 August 2007 17:55 (eighteen years ago)

so the secret-identity stuff was handled ok. i liked the way the episode ended. and the relationship dialogue in the show is good, like the way don's wife feels him out about buying summer home and he demurs and she says something like, "good, i like seeing my father."

tipsy mothra, Friday, 17 August 2007 15:44 (eighteen years ago)

Pimpin' aint easy.

Oilyrags, Friday, 17 August 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)

Should I torrent this, Americans?

Dom Passantino, Friday, 17 August 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)

oh yeah the pete campbell thing. like "you fucked him before, now you can fuck him for me." sweet.

xpost: sure. it's pretty good.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 17 August 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)

I haven't seen last night's episode, but last week's was really fantastic. I liked how they managed to show the position of the blueblood junior ad exec from multiple angles which made the final scene where he's looking out over the skyline seeing that from his vantage point the city is ostensibly his even though he knows he's completely mediocre and unworthy.

Also, divorced mom's kid is delightfully weird.

Bill in Chicago, Friday, 17 August 2007 16:57 (eighteen years ago)

he's a big jew obviously!

this show could be so much better. all the wife-in-therapy stuff... i mean.. really? already? they should really have pulled an ER and just shown the working world, it's SO much more interesting. as it stands they don't really do that stuff too well either.

s1ocki, Friday, 17 August 2007 17:30 (eighteen years ago)

and all that divorced-mom-with-volkswagen stuff is so pandering. yes we know times were changing.

s1ocki, Friday, 17 August 2007 17:30 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, fair criticism. i like it anyway.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 17 August 2007 18:41 (eighteen years ago)

So far I've watched an episode and a half- pretty good. Like a Rock Hudson-Doris Day movie crossed with the seedy opening love of Pyscho with accompanying Saul Bass opening credits.

James Redd and the Blecchs, Friday, 24 August 2007 04:53 (eighteen years ago)

I was kinda hoping that for historical accuracy the Greenwich Village club scene would have an extra dressed up as Moondog and another as Tiny Tim.

James Redd and the Blecchs, Friday, 24 August 2007 05:46 (eighteen years ago)

"It's like watching a dog play the piano." Wow.

I like this show. I enjoyed the fact that the tone of the show holds the beatniks in as much contempt as the soulless ad men. My fear is that it will become message-oriented, askew its historical climate and not allow the characters to wallow in their sexism, racism and homophobia--that they will learn their lesson about diversity. I want to see them "learn" their lesson only insofar as it allows them to make more money and become more attuned ad men. Really, in my mind, this setting is the birth scene of the new right in America.

Bill in Chicago, Friday, 24 August 2007 15:21 (eighteen years ago)

whats up with the redhead secretary saying "you know what they say, the medium is the message"? did that phrase exist in 1960?

, Sunday, 26 August 2007 12:53 (eighteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_medium_is_the_message

The phrase was coined by McLuhan in his 1964 book, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man.

max, Sunday, 26 August 2007 15:11 (eighteen years ago)

It's anticipatory plagiarism, like Leo DiCaprio saying "Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose in Titanic.

James Redd and the Blecchs, Monday, 27 August 2007 01:38 (eighteen years ago)

all seven episodes running in marathon this weekend.

I want to like this show, it's very pretty to look at, and the city and the office almost take on the quality of a fable. But there's not a single character or even a single line of dialogue in any of the episodes I've seen that makes it seem even vaguely interesting beyond that. MAYBE the jewish department store heiress, but since she only ever interacts with Draper (the sociopath in the dishwater suit) it's all cancelled out. Pete and Dan are more pathetic than anything. I know this character arc, they both get cancer in their fifties and their children don't miss them when they die.

El Tomboto, Monday, 27 August 2007 14:07 (eighteen years ago)

The monologue about why post-Depression guys drink vs. post-WW II guys is one of many scenes that are as good as stage drama or Sopranos.

Eazy, Monday, 27 August 2007 14:31 (eighteen years ago)

ha, ok

El Tomboto, Monday, 27 August 2007 14:44 (eighteen years ago)

"if you like television, or theater, there's a few lines in this show that you might also like!" don't turn me into Morbius on this thread

El Tomboto, Monday, 27 August 2007 14:45 (eighteen years ago)

dude: "how are your cigarettes made?"
young cig exec: "i have no idea."
old cig exec: "shame on you."

^^ i like that. it's the only episode i've seen.

gff, Monday, 27 August 2007 14:49 (eighteen years ago)

likeD

gff, Monday, 27 August 2007 14:49 (eighteen years ago)

I finally got around to watching the first four episodes. I want to like this more than I do. But I'll probably keep watching, if for no other reason than to watch Draper nail the divorced neighbor. Or at least some vague reference to her sleeping with Democratic hopeful John F. Kennedy.

will, Monday, 27 August 2007 14:51 (eighteen years ago)

i liked that little exchange.

honestly, i'm watching this show first and foremost for the incredible set design/costuming. i'm obsessed with this kind of stuff, and it's enough to keep me mostly paying attention for an hour or so each week.

xpost

lauren, Monday, 27 August 2007 14:51 (eighteen years ago)

if by "incredible set design/costuming" you mean "redhead secretary," i'm with you

gff, Monday, 27 August 2007 15:01 (eighteen years ago)

"fancy cigarette-dispenser gadget"

Eazy, Monday, 27 August 2007 15:02 (eighteen years ago)

I was cool with the redhead secretary until she turned out to be a slut for draper's boss. I've already seen this movie too!

El Tomboto, Monday, 27 August 2007 15:04 (eighteen years ago)

ROGER!

johnny crunch, Monday, 3 September 2007 13:44 (eighteen years ago)

IF ILX HAD AVATAR IMAGES WHAT WOU,D YOURS BE????

, Monday, 3 September 2007 14:15 (eighteen years ago)

i thought that was going to be him yakking up oysters/martinis..

i am so using the line "dont let me see the bottom of that drink".

johnny crunch, Monday, 3 September 2007 15:20 (eighteen years ago)

i'm still enjoying it. on the scale of recent tv shows i've enjoyed and reasons why, it sits maybe closer to the first season of grey's anatomy than to the wire. but the soapiness doesn't bother me and the social commentary is kind of funny even when (most of the time) very obvious. not sure where they're going with draper's neurotic-nympho wife, but i like that the actress is named january jones. and the design, yes, it's nice to fantasize that's how everything looked then. (seems to be taking a cue from in the mood for love maybe. design porn.)

tipsy mothra, Monday, 3 September 2007 15:23 (eighteen years ago)

IN THE 1950S PEOPLE WERE MEAN BIGOTED DEPRESSIVE DRUNKS BUT EVERYTHING LOOKED FABULOUS.

tipsy mothra, Monday, 3 September 2007 15:24 (eighteen years ago)

(also the new republic seems to be leading a backlash against the show, which is enough to make me like it on principle.)

tipsy mothra, Monday, 3 September 2007 15:25 (eighteen years ago)

two weeks pass...

Which Ep. had the discussion of the various veterans drinking styles?

James Redd and the Blecchs, Friday, 21 September 2007 03:40 (eighteen years ago)

I'm watching the episode called "The Hobo Code." For all your Sopranos talk did you notice that the drifter was Father Phil, once again cadging a free meal?

James Redd and the Blecchs, Friday, 21 September 2007 03:49 (eighteen years ago)

three weeks pass...

ok so the Nixon vs. Kennedy episode actually has some shit in it. I might have to start paying attention now.

El Tomboto, Friday, 12 October 2007 11:49 (eighteen years ago)

Is there more coming? That felt a lot like a season wrap to me.

Oilyrags, Saturday, 13 October 2007 00:56 (eighteen years ago)

it's been renewed for another season.

lauren, Saturday, 13 October 2007 01:20 (eighteen years ago)

just watched the season finale. overall, i still like the show a lot. kept a nice balance of soap opera/satire/social commentary. good cast. one scene in the last episode felt very lynch-y -- when draper's wife (january jones looks v. much like a lynch girl) was talking to the divorcee's kid, with his front tooth missing. made me think there's actually a fair amount of lynch influence in the show, although more in its details than its ambiance or narrative.

tipsy mothra, Saturday, 20 October 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)

love this show - only six episodes in (though i've been spoiled enough)(apparently kennedy wins?), 1/2 ice storm prequel 1/2 the conquest of cool: the miniseries.

balls, Saturday, 20 October 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)

i don't see that at all, tipsy. there's some actual gristle and personification in mad men, not a lynch-like weird cynically bracketed 'all-americanism' that hides some real rottenness.

and by job was i gobsmacked by the peggy plotline

remy bean, Saturday, 20 October 2007 19:44 (eighteen years ago)

that scene (xxp) seemed sort of uneven to me...really loved the kid and the last line of 'i dont really know how long 20 minutes is' but didnt 100% buy birdie as asking kid to tell her it will be allright...dunno, seems minor to focus on 1 line but i wouldve rather she rambled more about herself.

johnny crunch, Saturday, 20 October 2007 19:51 (eighteen years ago)

well the personification is pitched at some halfway level between self-conscious types (the lynch-y melodrama mode) and "real" characters. there is some cynicism there, but it's not a thoroughgoing cynicism. more sardonic than cynical, really. i don't mean to overemphasize the lynchyness, it was really that one scene that brought it to mind. the show has a character all its own.

tipsy mothra, Saturday, 20 October 2007 19:54 (eighteen years ago)

less pete campbell, more christina hendricks in skintight dresses

El Tomboto, Sunday, 21 October 2007 00:45 (eighteen years ago)

word. (whoa wikipedia sez c.h. is a knoxville girl. raised in idaho though.) as for pete, i'm hopin season 2 finds him drunk in a gay bar with salvatore.

tipsy mothra, Sunday, 21 October 2007 03:58 (eighteen years ago)

six months pass...

Any other UK types currently lapping up this stylish, restrained, subtly dark and sometimes very funny series?

chap, Monday, 21 April 2008 13:40 (seventeen years ago)

oh ye. The series started off a bit lol sexism, but is starting to do a good line in people confronting their bullshit. Also is funny.

stet, Monday, 21 April 2008 13:47 (seventeen years ago)

The Roger puking up oysters episode was great.

chap, Monday, 21 April 2008 13:50 (seventeen years ago)

Best US import around on UK TV at the minute. Didn't see last night's, but that's what iPlayer is for.

DavidM, Monday, 21 April 2008 13:50 (seventeen years ago)

Also repeated tomorrow on BBC2.

chap, Monday, 21 April 2008 13:51 (seventeen years ago)

Pam & I sat drooling at the set design/props in ep 1 and then couldn't work up the enthusiasm to watch it again. Actually, I did see about half of another episode but it seems to be being repeated all over the shop on BBC4, so I'll probably eventually see it all.

Michael Jones, Monday, 21 April 2008 13:53 (seventeen years ago)

It takes a while to get into, I wasn't properly sucked in till ep 3 or 4.

chap, Monday, 21 April 2008 13:54 (seventeen years ago)

xposts! Yes, we're hooked. I can't say I love it, but I really like it. Have held myself back from reading all of above thread for fear of spoilers, but I'm also a little wary of backstory/flashbacks/man with a secret stuff. More and more impressed with dude who plays Draper.

G00blar, Monday, 21 April 2008 13:56 (seventeen years ago)

I think last night's on BBC4 ("Red In The Face") is the tipping point for me from general enjoyment and delight in the production design and sets to being properly in love with this show. What did it was the note perfect series of vignettes, especially Peggy's dance and rebuff from Pete, the beatniks, and the hobo "lore of the gatepost" and the way it tied in with the scene with Don and his little son.

The characters have all bedded down now and they are pulling off the trick of moving the story and characters forward but without it feeling at all clunky or mechanistic (something the Sopranos also did brilliantly at times). Even the more throwaway bits are still blessed with gorgeous photography and great music.

>Have held myself back from reading all of above thread for fear of spoilers

Me too - don't want to ruin it now!

Bill A, Monday, 21 April 2008 14:38 (seventeen years ago)

Maybe we should start our own thread before the americans wake up and start bustin out the spoilers.

chap, Monday, 21 April 2008 15:20 (seventeen years ago)

LOVE LOVE LOVE this show, best drama on tv now that sopranos and the wire are gone. i swear if this thing had been on hbo instead of amc it would've gotten crazy hype.

balls, Monday, 21 April 2008 18:01 (seventeen years ago)

classic
http://media.tumblr.com/aGkz4XFcZ872u7x00HJm1D54_400.jpg

when's season 2?

czn, Friday, 25 April 2008 19:07 (seventeen years ago)

one month passes...

July 27th!

Michael White, Thursday, 29 May 2008 17:23 (seventeen years ago)

o i just watched the whole thing - completely brilliant - cant believe everyone hating on it upthread

jhøshea, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 15:47 (seventeen years ago)

really looking forward to the new season. imo the show got stronger and stronger as it progressed.

lauren, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:01 (seventeen years ago)

yea im just in the middle of this: freakin awesome.

banriquit, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:03 (seventeen years ago)

im not sure if it got better or it just kept going deeper adding complexity - either way it def kept exceeding my expectations - im pretty much fascinated by every single character except maybe a couple of the secondary ad men

jhøshea, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:05 (seventeen years ago)

The early episodes had to have a lot of explanatory "Hah, people in the 50s sure were racist/sexist" in order for the latter stuff to have the right punch, so they did suffer.

The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:08 (seventeen years ago)

petes speech abt hunting * glen telling betty he doesnt know how long 20 minutes is * don learning abt hobo symbols * roger apologizing to don for hitting on betty * the kodak carousel presentation

so many great moments!

jhøshea, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:11 (seventeen years ago)

lol all those are from the second half of the season so there u go

jhøshea, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:12 (seventeen years ago)

<3 <3 <3 rachel menken

jhøshea, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:13 (seventeen years ago)

im kind of like, this could all easily be set in the present rly; but some of the "lol they invented spray cans stuff" is lol.

banriquit, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:18 (seventeen years ago)

roger apologizing to don for hitting on betty

Then Don's revenge on Roger!

chap, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:22 (seventeen years ago)

the people upthread are right though, about the condescending tone. it always made me cringe. dude has a heart attack then says "i dont know how it happened. i did everything they told me to, ate the butter, drank the cream." is that shit supposed to be funny? a lot of bs lines like that seem to be there to make the middle-aged viewers feel good about their lifestyles.

deeznuts, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:24 (seventeen years ago)

I think it would lose a lot set in the present - it would have a very different visual aesthetic, for a start, and the working world doesn't have quite that level of casual misogyny, surely.

chap, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:24 (seventeen years ago)

I saw one episode on TV the other night - Peggy gets birth control pills - that's Zoe Bartlett! I like to see more West Wingers out and about, even if they are slutting it up all over town in too-long skirts.

Finefinemusic, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:25 (seventeen years ago)

i don't know where you're getting condescending from, deeznuts: those lines are straight-up dramatic irony.

remy bean, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:26 (seventeen years ago)

bert coopers reaction to petes don reveal was so classic - love berts whole yoda steez

jhøshea, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:27 (seventeen years ago)

that is bobby morse: he was a father of one of my former students, and apparently some of the delay in this season was due to some severe health problems he was experiencing. he was a really really decent guy when i met him.

remy bean, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:30 (seventeen years ago)

hes really good - love the folksy confidence - lol at him being all im not really much of a drinker when everyone else in the office is trying to out manly each other

jhøshea, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:32 (seventeen years ago)

remy i wasnt invested in the series or anything so maybe that particular line was actually set up in prior scenes or something, but it seemed like a total throwaway line designed to give the audience a feeling of self-satisfaction

and in the eps i saw those were pretty consistent & always grating

deeznuts, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:33 (seventeen years ago)

i mean im assuming yr interpretation of dramatic irony is not "lol this married dude who just had a heart attack from fucking a 20 year old chick just said butter & cream are GOOD for him, when WE know now that is not the case!"

deeznuts, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:35 (seventeen years ago)

well, i think as isolated lines they are a little grating (or seem like they're trying to shock), but in the broader context of the characters' pigheadedness and wrongness on so very many things, they are a big component of the show's fabric

remy bean, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:38 (seventeen years ago)

okay, also i lolled at the phony village beatniks

remy bean, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:38 (seventeen years ago)

like any good period piece its gonna hit the shit thats aged absurdly while maintaining the underlying timelessness of human experience. im sure if any of us had a time machine there would be a lot of lol u fools are ignorant while we just ignored the universality of the situation.

jhøshea, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:43 (seventeen years ago)

okay, also i lolled at the phony village beatniks

-- remy bean, Wednesday, June 11, 2008 12:38 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

its too bad these guys arent smart enough to call don on his nihilism in any sort of meaningful way

jhøshea, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:44 (seventeen years ago)

yeah that makes some sense & dont get me wrong im looking forward to regularly watching the upcoming season, but that kind of crap really stood out to me as a casual viewer

i think superficially at least it seems like the show is more concerned w/ making various points than realistically humanizing its characters, which is always a turn-off for me, but you could be right that given some investment it becomes justified xp

deeznuts, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:45 (seventeen years ago)

yah i find the characters absolutely compelling - def the best part of the show - their unique qualities challenging the urge to see them as museum pieces is just delightful tension

jhøshea, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:48 (seventeen years ago)

idk i dont remember the butter & cream line specifically but i think it's less of a nod to the viewer than internal sarcasm w/r/t them being ad men & spinning the health benefits(or lack of health detriments) of products like this (cigarettes also) while truthfully knowing the risks.

basically i think roger is trying to get a laff from his coworkers w/ that

johnny crunch, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 18:53 (seventeen years ago)

TOO META

but seriously that would be brilliant if it werent for the fact that like 75% of those lines were spoken by the 'ignorant' housewives

or maybe that was supposed to demonstrate how ignorant housewives were in those days!

deeznuts, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 18:57 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/22/magazine/22madmen-t.html

jhøshea, Friday, 20 June 2008 16:46 (seventeen years ago)

i mean im assuming yr interpretation of dramatic irony is not "lol this married dude who just had a heart attack from fucking a 20 year old chick just said butter & cream are GOOD for him, when WE know now that is not the case!"

-- deeznuts, Wednesday, June 11, 2008 5:35 PM (1 week ago) Bookmark Link

clarification: he says he was getting lots of dairy for his ULCER; it wasn't *that* much of a lol irony thing.

hope they bring cooper back, though. i also hope they bring back the divorcee: january jones's meltdown in the last ep was fire.

this is such an amazing fkn show.

banriquit, Saturday, 21 June 2008 23:09 (seventeen years ago)

i think superficially at least it seems like the show is more concerned w/ making various points than realistically humanizing its characters

I don't really get this, at all. Like, I keep trying to construct a rebuttal and just end up circling back to "watch the episodes again".

Lamp, Saturday, 21 June 2008 23:22 (seventeen years ago)

nat nytimes magazine article ^^^ contains some fascinating info but also mild SPOILERZ - so be warned

jhøshea, Sunday, 22 June 2008 00:00 (seventeen years ago)

psyched for the new season

max, Sunday, 22 June 2008 00:05 (seventeen years ago)

jon hamm is really fuckin fantastic, sort of unbelievable i think

max, Sunday, 22 June 2008 00:05 (seventeen years ago)

"unbelievably good" i mean

max, Sunday, 22 June 2008 00:06 (seventeen years ago)

agreed completely

jhøshea, Sunday, 22 June 2008 00:19 (seventeen years ago)

too bad hbo passed on it - would be even better w/swearing and boobs

jhøshea, Sunday, 22 June 2008 00:28 (seventeen years ago)

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/06/17/magazine/22cover-395.jpg

jhøshea, Sunday, 22 June 2008 13:04 (seventeen years ago)

i think superficially at least it seems like the show is more concerned w/ making various points than realistically humanizing its characters

The Chicago Tribune interview I linked to on the other thread does a good job of explaining what Matthew Weiner is trying (and I think succeeding) to do with his characters.

Alba, Sunday, 22 June 2008 13:12 (seventeen years ago)

Can't wait for the new season.

One of the things I was thinking the other day that I hope they do is make Pete at least a little sympathetic in the coming season. The situation they've put him in--even though he's a self-serving little prick--could make for good drama if he becomes something more than a one-sided character.

G00blar, Sunday, 22 June 2008 13:49 (seventeen years ago)

lol i find pete v sympathetic - hes just incredibly clueless - v little relationship to reality w/the cursed talent and resources to keep it at arms length. like he could easily be a good guy if he knew what that looked like - but he doesnt cause he was raised by wolves.

jhøshea, Sunday, 22 June 2008 13:59 (seventeen years ago)

agree -- none of the characters are 100% sympathetic, but i kind of feel for pete's family situation a little.

banriquit, Sunday, 22 June 2008 14:02 (seventeen years ago)

Well, that's what I'm saying; they should exploit that a bit more by not always making him such a turd (or perhaps not having Draper, Cooper, Stirling, et al. be so unified in their disdain of him).

G00blar, Sunday, 22 June 2008 14:04 (seventeen years ago)

his hunting story was one of the highlights of the season

jhøshea, Sunday, 22 June 2008 14:07 (seventeen years ago)

i want to read pete's talking bear story

max, Sunday, 22 June 2008 14:14 (seventeen years ago)

i just started watching this last night; first episode is good but yeah, obvious, etc. so I'm glad to see this gets toned down and things get more complex and nuanced as it goes on.

akm, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 17:29 (seventeen years ago)

it's kind of wack to say, but i felt really low when the sopranos ended for a few days: loved this show so much i felt that low after i finished the first season. and it's back in a month.

banriquit, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 17:43 (seventeen years ago)

definitely looking forward to chuning in this season. also kind of wack to say but there isnt a single tv show going right now thats must-watch for me or close to it; hopefully thisll be that.

deeznuts, Tuesday, 1 July 2008 17:45 (seventeen years ago)

Cameo appearance contest

http://blogs.amctv.com/mad-men/2008/06/mad-men-contest-early-submissions.php

Oilyrags, Friday, 4 July 2008 13:30 (seventeen years ago)

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i191/fluxion23/shoot.jpg

kenan, Saturday, 12 July 2008 00:42 (seventeen years ago)

Grace Kelly never did that.

kenan, Saturday, 12 July 2008 00:46 (seventeen years ago)

Minor spoilers:
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/37398

chap, Saturday, 12 July 2008 00:56 (seventeen years ago)

yeah that's pretty minor, seeing as how it doesn't say anything, and then has a disclaimer to the nothing that it says.

kenan, Saturday, 12 July 2008 01:06 (seventeen years ago)

ok, from the same ep as before -- who designed this dress?

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i191/fluxion23/dress.jpg

It's, like, the greatest dress ever made.

kenan, Saturday, 12 July 2008 01:09 (seventeen years ago)

It outlines the whole show's overall structure, which I didn't know before.

xpost to snark

chap, Saturday, 12 July 2008 01:10 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, yer right, I didn't know that, either. I was put-off by the classic AICN commentary. "Which means we’ll probably see Don Draper switch to turtlenecks, drop acid and put the bone to a few damn dirty hippies!" Oh god shut up shut up shut up right now.

kenan, Saturday, 12 July 2008 01:12 (seventeen years ago)

Christ yeah, you've got to turn your hyperbole and bad pun filter on when you delve into AICN.

chap, Saturday, 12 July 2008 01:15 (seventeen years ago)

Or just your insufferable dumbass filter.

kenan, Saturday, 12 July 2008 01:26 (seventeen years ago)

Just watched the whole first season over the weekend. Great, great series all around. Looking forward to the second season in a couple weeks.

Watching the whole thing in rapid succession probably works best for story continuity, especially when a lot of what's great about the show is buried in details. However, the one thing that seemed forced and unnecessary and with nowhere to go was Joan's roommate outing herself as a lovestruck stalkerish type. Oh, and the fact that Don/Dick's mysterious backstory had the makings of something better than it turned out to be, but the fact it was just brushed off by Cooper making Pete look like even more of a twerp was satisfactory payoff.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 14 July 2008 15:25 (seventeen years ago)

I was shocked by how much I ended up enjoying this show (given that the character's are pretty much without fail completely repellent.) I think I could watch a whole show just about creepy as fuck Pete Campbell. What a trainwreck of a human being.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 18:48 (seventeen years ago)

I love how well cast Pete is. There's no suit in the world that doesn't make him look like a child playing dress-up. Which is like, exactly.

kenan, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 19:29 (seventeen years ago)

Ok -- who else got all misty during Don's slide show presentation? Show of hands. Come on, you can admit it.

This is some pretty great TV, right here.

kenan, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 19:30 (seventeen years ago)

The slide show was nice. Not misty material, though.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 19:32 (seventeen years ago)

Homeslice who got kicked out of his house for fooling around certainly thought it was. :)

kenan, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 19:33 (seventeen years ago)

Everyone is really well cast. In fact I'm not sure the show would do half as well with different actors (imagining someone other Draper or Campbell or Betty in those respective roles is nigh impossible although I guess they would have shaped the show around a different actor).

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 19:34 (seventeen years ago)

I didn't get misty about the slideshow, but I was strangely moved by the final shot even though I don't normally have much sympathy for Draper's "problems".

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 19:37 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, I thought the slide show set up the real punch of the final scene.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 20:52 (seventeen years ago)

Also got misty guy was great in his underwear in Draper's office earlier in that episode.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 20:56 (seventeen years ago)

IMDB says "Roger Stirling" will be back for the whole second season. I'm glad to see they haven't written him out of the story altogether, because more Roger = more Joan.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:16 (seventeen years ago)

I was strangely moved by the final shot even though I don't normally have much sympathy for Draper's "problems".

agreed, but in this respect the show falls very much in line with the Sopranos tradition (and since the creator essentially said he's not going to pretend that the Sopranos isn't the template he's trying to follow, I guess maybe that's obvious). The 'hero' is incredibly flawed and messed up. I still kind of like him though. I even kind of like and feel bad for Pete Campbell sometimes, he's just so fucking pathetic.

It doesn't look like season 2 is jumping forward very much in time from the stills I saw the other day; maybe a year or something. It's not going all summer of love.

Roger is kind of unbearable, but more Joan is wonderful.

Does anyone else think that maybe Cooper is the guy who came by Don's hosue when he was a kid? They very obviously put that flashback in the same episode where Cooper says "you're like me" and Cooper's not caring about the big reveal made me suspect that this was an open issue b/w him and Draper for a long time.

akm, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 21:36 (seventeen years ago)

season 2 = 1962

G00blar, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 22:14 (seventeen years ago)

16 emmy nominations this morning.

akm, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:46 (seventeen years ago)

One for the Wire! (This was probably better than the Wire this year, to be honest.)

Oilyrags, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:49 (seventeen years ago)

"Does anyone else think that maybe Cooper is the guy who came by Don's hosue when he was a kid?"

I doubt it. I suspect the reason Cooper doesn't care is because Draper = $$$ and Pete Campbell = jack shit.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 17 July 2008 16:37 (seventeen years ago)

cooper, as a big ayn rand fan, would eat up the story of a poor whore's kid re-creating himself as one of the most successful ad men in new york

max, Thursday, 17 July 2008 16:40 (seventeen years ago)

True, but that's not the story Pete told cuz he didn't know it (that said the story of potentially AWOL maybe murderer re-creating himself holds it's own allures, I suppose.)

Alex in SF, Thursday, 17 July 2008 17:05 (seventeen years ago)

Where in Cooper's personal philosophy do Ayn Rand and trimming bonsai trees intersect? There's a brain teaser.

kenan, Thursday, 17 July 2008 18:15 (seventeen years ago)

intricately sculpted pubes glistening in the moonlight on the seventy-fifth floor of a glass-and-steel skyscraper

remy bean, Thursday, 17 July 2008 18:17 (seventeen years ago)

why you gotta go and drag pubes into this

kenan, Thursday, 17 July 2008 18:17 (seventeen years ago)

yes yes, I know... that's what she said.

kenan, Thursday, 17 July 2008 18:18 (seventeen years ago)

TONIGHT (in the states...tomorrow, let's hope, for the rest of the world)

G00blar, Sunday, 27 July 2008 19:24 (seventeen years ago)

awesome

Ed, Sunday, 27 July 2008 19:38 (seventeen years ago)

v. EXCITED

johnny crunch, Sunday, 27 July 2008 21:05 (seventeen years ago)

mmhmmm...not that I expected this show to really start the season with some kind of blow-up episode, but that was a little...slow.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 28 July 2008 02:56 (seventeen years ago)

Nah, yer just too old for the muscular new poetry. ;)

kenan, Monday, 28 July 2008 03:04 (seventeen years ago)

This show is so insanely literate - its like a big love letter to the writers of the 40s and 50s. Sloan Flannery age of anxiety robert penn warren and all that... Betty's character is really incredibly done... the "some days this is all I think about" bit sends chills down my spine.

s.clover, Monday, 28 July 2008 18:15 (seventeen years ago)

betty's flirtation w. prostitution is pretty rad.

remy bean, Monday, 28 July 2008 18:17 (seventeen years ago)

so was mine

latebloomer, Monday, 28 July 2008 18:27 (seventeen years ago)

j/k, it wasn't a flirtation

latebloomer, Monday, 28 July 2008 18:27 (seventeen years ago)

That was the most ridiculous sweater in history. I loved it.

Oilyrags, Monday, 28 July 2008 18:29 (seventeen years ago)

Also:

"Do you want to have kids?"

Oilyrags, Monday, 28 July 2008 18:34 (seventeen years ago)

Just read this thread from the start and I am so amused by the haters when this started and the cult followers here now. I love love love this show. Whoever upthread said it's like Rock & Doris meet Hitchcock...OTM

I haven't seen last nites season opener...saving it until Ihave two to watch back to back

*bangs head* addict addict...

Wiggy Woo, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 00:15 (seventeen years ago)

Now I am quietly waiting for
the catastrophe of my personality
to seem beautiful again,
and interesting, and modern.

The country is grey and
brown and white in trees,
snows and skies of laughter
always diminishing, less funny
not just darker, not just grey.

It may be the coldest day of
the year, what does he think of
that? I mean, what do I? And if I do,
perhaps I am myself again.

webinar, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 10:42 (seventeen years ago)

- Frank O'Hara, Mayakovsky

webinar, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 10:43 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/books/review/Logan-t.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

webinar, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 11:21 (seventeen years ago)

Frank O'Hara stirringly otm as usual, and if it's not too strange to add, also handsome in exactly the right way, more odd than bookish, and more ugly than pretty.

kenan, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 12:29 (seventeen years ago)

"However, I have never clogged myself with the praises of
pastoral life, nor with nostalgia for an innocent past of
perverted acts in pastures. No. One need never leave the
confines of New York to get all the greenery one wishes--I can't
even enjoy a blade of grass unless i know there's a subway
handy, or a record store or some other sign that people do not
totally *regret* life."

s.clover, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 14:47 (seventeen years ago)

http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t250/KillaKastro_2007/6fhaxc6.jpg

and what, Tuesday, 29 July 2008 14:48 (seventeen years ago)

http://bp1.blogger.com/_LmSR0uNyaSo/SIiQ48dk4QI/AAAAAAAAAZ8/R2_B4pvGTV4/s1600-h/610x-2.jpg

webinar, Friday, 1 August 2008 09:56 (seventeen years ago)

lolmakeupandwardrobe

Oilyrags, Friday, 1 August 2008 13:24 (seventeen years ago)

too bad hbo passed on it - would be even better w/swearing and boobs

This couldn't be more wrong if ILX WHIPPING BOY said it -- the hair-coming-down scenes (cf. Don & wifey post-hangover, wifey humping the washer / dryer, even Pete's bear story) wouldn't have half as much impact if there was T&A and "fuck" all over the place.

So glad that Peggy found her professional sea legs by the end of S1, especially when she stood up to Red w/ that gloriously withering "oh my god, you actually think you're helping" line.

David R., Friday, 8 August 2008 13:18 (seventeen years ago)

And add me to the list of folks what got mildly misty during the Carousel scene.

David R., Friday, 8 August 2008 13:19 (seventeen years ago)

http://media.tumblr.com/0RT7wSWSTc352c59zgjHevIO_400.jpg

Proof the show would be just as cool set in 2008.

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 10 August 2008 08:24 (seventeen years ago)

You're absolutely right, but Jesus, I kind of wish I'd never seen that.

There's facial hair where there shouldn't be.

en i see kay, Sunday, 10 August 2008 09:35 (seventeen years ago)

More Jon Hamm facial hair to be had in the Day The Earth Stood Still remake, I think.

Pipe dude's beard = A++

David R., Wednesday, 13 August 2008 13:08 (seventeen years ago)

Don's transformation into borderline rapist this past episode was a bit harrowing

akm, Wednesday, 13 August 2008 13:17 (seventeen years ago)

I'm just catching up now; the first episode was a little too Setting Up Big Themes For The Season, but otherwise, awesome. Episode 2 in particular might be the best thing they've done so far.

G00blar, Thursday, 14 August 2008 16:46 (seventeen years ago)

"It's like watching a dog play the piano." Wow.

-- Bill in Chicago, Friday, August 24, 2007 11:21 AM (11 months ago) Bookmark Link

Saw this episode last night and this made me spit beer all over the place.

mizzell, Thursday, 14 August 2008 16:49 (seventeen years ago)

Don's transformation into borderline rapist this past episode was a bit harrowing

-- akm, Wednesday, August 13, 2008 6:17 AM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link

yes - it was unnecessary, and a bit sloppy? i kinda hated it: it was shocking, sure, but not in the way i think it should have been.

remy bean, Thursday, 14 August 2008 17:08 (seventeen years ago)

don just seems all round grizzlier this season. i think the medical check-up was meant to take some of the edge off invincible don draper. i like how his facial hair growing ability is clearly at odds with setting the show in the clean shaven sixties, too, and he's always got a slight homer simpson beard going on.

schlump, Thursday, 14 August 2008 17:17 (seventeen years ago)

Part of the weirdness was that he executed the maneuver as if it had been carefully choreographed by Alvin Ailey

nabisco, Thursday, 14 August 2008 17:18 (seventeen years ago)

i think it is a big plant; i predict it will pay off in spades later during the season. (see also: don's conversations w. peggy, betty's call-girl friend.)

remy bean, Thursday, 14 August 2008 17:20 (seventeen years ago)

more Jimmy Barrett pls.

petey_carnum, Thursday, 14 August 2008 17:46 (seventeen years ago)

more Jimmy Barrett pls.

doesn't seeing him/watching mad men just make you want to be awful and sexist and dashing? like with the sleazy steel guy schmoozing the girls when pete campbell had taken him out to pitch an idea.

schlump, Thursday, 14 August 2008 17:48 (seventeen years ago)

it just makes me want to have more class and style... not necessarily be sleazy to broads.

petey_carnum, Thursday, 14 August 2008 17:51 (seventeen years ago)

best episode of the season so far

akm, Monday, 18 August 2008 06:21 (seventeen years ago)

^otm

Maybe the best single episode of the show so far.

Jouster, Monday, 18 August 2008 07:46 (seventeen years ago)

jimmy barrett is great and is also played by the guy who gets scared behind the diner in mulholland drive

has a distinctive face

cozwn, Monday, 18 August 2008 08:09 (seventeen years ago)

there were some fantastic shots of don & betty in the last two episodes particularly in the car 2 wks ago. i wish i had a painting of it

johnny crunch, Tuesday, 19 August 2008 21:13 (seventeen years ago)

MOZART!!!

David R., Monday, 25 August 2008 22:38 (seventeen years ago)

Maybe the best single episode of the show so far.

otm^^^otm On the whole, every episode this season has been better than anything in season one.

Elvis Telecom, Monday, 25 August 2008 23:11 (seventeen years ago)

really? I kinda thought it peaked mid-season 1, I've been a little underwhelmed by s2

last night's was pretty good though, my fave so far this year

dmr, Monday, 25 August 2008 23:18 (seventeen years ago)

MOZART!!!

hahaha yeah that was pretty unbelievable

dmr, Monday, 25 August 2008 23:19 (seventeen years ago)

I felt kinda dumb that it didn't occur to me until today that of course Pete's not infertile, he already has a kid!

dmr, Monday, 25 August 2008 23:20 (seventeen years ago)

ayo who was don posting that poetry to in s02e01? im guessing the department store heiress but i need shit spelled out...

special guest stars mark bronson, Monday, 25 August 2008 23:57 (seventeen years ago)

It was pointedly not revealed. I'm thinking the boho chick, myself.

Oilyrags, Monday, 25 August 2008 23:58 (seventeen years ago)

yea i was thinking they'd have revealed it by now is all. guess they will.

special guest stars mark bronson, Tuesday, 26 August 2008 00:05 (seventeen years ago)

mustve been the hep chick - what w/the this existential shit i saw a beatnik reading reminded me of u note

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 26 August 2008 00:09 (seventeen years ago)

That segue from Campbell in the doctor's office w/ the spank mag (turning down the US News & World Report!) to Sterling playing with the paddle ball (and the paddle-fapping sound overlapping w/ Campbell's scene just after Pete leaves the frame) = Emmy-baiting editing.

David R., Tuesday, 26 August 2008 00:42 (seventeen years ago)

lol @ mozart

latebloomer, Tuesday, 26 August 2008 00:48 (seventeen years ago)

really? I kinda thought it peaked mid-season 1, I've been a little underwhelmed by s2

The pacing of the S2 episodes is better and the plots are less aware of themselves. There's less "look we're in 1960" obviousness.

Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 26 August 2008 15:09 (seventeen years ago)

Or they've gotten better @ blending in those flourishes (cf. the discussion w/ the officer about the blood alcohol level, and Don getting off with a fine).

David R., Tuesday, 26 August 2008 15:11 (seventeen years ago)

That segue from Campbell in the doctor's office w/ the spank mag (turning down the US News & World Report!) to Sterling playing with the paddle ball (and the paddle-fapping sound overlapping w/ Campbell's scene just after Pete leaves the frame)=Emmy-baiting editing.

It also made Joan's line "you can hear you doing that out in the hall" a lot funnier

Lamp, Tuesday, 26 August 2008 15:15 (seventeen years ago)

it reminded me of a sopranos moment; when vito was hooking up with the fireman guy, it cut from those two collapsing onto a bed to a close up of a toy train going into a tunnel. which reminds me: when we saw don's flashback to childhood, with the guy who works on his family's ranch, i remember staring at that guy wondering who he was. and then last episode i started thinking about the role of creepy priests in this and the sopranos, and remembered that it was the creepy priest. i think.

interesting theories about the o'hara book.
it keeps getting better, anyway. i think there's a slight predictability to some of it that comes with the weird historical/representative veneer of sixties-ism that its shot in - so you know that the bed's about to break, or the car's about to crash. and i think they need to do something so that the characters, particularly the females, can operate outside of binary docile/upset modes. but it's getting great. peggy especially.

schlump, Wednesday, 27 August 2008 12:24 (seventeen years ago)

i was assuming the book was not for the beatnik chick coz like... wouldn't she already own it? but this episode kind of wraps it up for the heiress, so.

lol'd at pete's cop-out excuses for not wanting a kid: economy tanking, imminent nuclear war... nothing changes.

special guest stars mark bronson, Wednesday, 27 August 2008 12:28 (seventeen years ago)

the paddle-ball edit had me disturbing the neighbours with my deranged lols.

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Wednesday, 27 August 2008 16:02 (seventeen years ago)

Saw it for the first time Sunday. Handsome and well-acted, but is it about adultery every week? zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 16:10 (seventeen years ago)

i also watched this the other day for the first time. there was a scene with different women getting dressed that was scored with what sounded like a decemberists song. is that a feature of the show - anachronistic (and crappy!) tunes? it kinda made me want to not watch it again.

velko, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 16:19 (seventeen years ago)

i cringed @ the decemberists usage also. that is NOT a feature of the show. at least hasnt thus far been

johnny crunch, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 16:20 (seventeen years ago)

that tune was jarring, but I didn't recognize it as the Decemberists.

The period refs in the dialogue come off as a little too knowing.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 16:23 (seventeen years ago)

so dons daughter walks into the bathroom sits down while hes shaving and says dont worry daddy i wont talk i dont want you to cut yrself and he looks deeply into the mirror sees what and gets deeply freaked out?

obv his daughters offer to keep quite mirors his request to the disturbing bobbie barrett to keep her mouth shut. maybe hes just realizing what a horrible person and how his domineering ways have damaged those around him - but maaaaybe hes thinking of a past suicide attempt? eh cutting?

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 16:31 (seventeen years ago)

decemberists. ack.

Mirrors were all over this episode. and of course peggy was the only girl in that opening sequence who didn't get dressed in front of one.

Roz, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:20 (seventeen years ago)

maybe hes just realizing what a horrible person and how his domineering ways have damaged those around him

that's how I read it.

akm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:24 (seventeen years ago)

last night's wasn't very good

homosexual II, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:27 (seventeen years ago)

i just wondered cause of the "cut yrself line" and it did kinda look like he was having a particular memory xp

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:28 (seventeen years ago)

that made me wonder, too.

lauren, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:30 (seventeen years ago)

kinda compelling how last ep bobbie barrett told peggy to be a woman not a man in the business world then this week joan told her not to dress like a little girl.

curious to see what sort of plans peggy has to get her desk out of the break room.

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:33 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, i think peggy is going to be the character that i like this season now that rachel's presumably gone.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:34 (seventeen years ago)

o man rachel is so painful - thats the sort of woman don should be spending his life with - except that hes a horrible person.

also rachel marring that guy who "loves comedians" :(

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:38 (seventeen years ago)

i love her! i wish don wasn't such a fucking asshole. in my head they have run off together and don isn't irretrievably fucked up.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:39 (seventeen years ago)

i am not good at watching tv shows where i don't like anyone, so rachel was a saving grace last season.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:40 (seventeen years ago)

yah everyone is kinda fucking insane

can we talk abt the advice don gave peggy when she was all fucked up in the hospital and shit? that was pretty potent stuff. quite empowering. but easily misunderstood (see: draper, don).

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:44 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, i like where they're going with don and peggy. peggy is the only woman i can stand to see don interacting with.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:45 (seventeen years ago)

he has a genuine soft spot for her - not sure if thats anything more specific than theyre both outsiders trying to beat the system or if well find out she reminds him of his sister or whatnot - i guess maybe he just kinda likes her like people do

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:49 (seventeen years ago)

she is quite likable

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:50 (seventeen years ago)

she seems to be a person to him, unlike all the other women he knows. he recognizes her. i liked the the moment earlier this season when he told her sex doesn't sell, that her feeling something sells.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:51 (seventeen years ago)

the show is good, though, at making me sympathize with characters i don't like, like Pete and Betty.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:52 (seventeen years ago)

she seems to be a person to him, unlike all the other women he knows. he recognizes her. i liked the the moment earlier this season when he told her sex doesn't sell, that her feeling something sells.

-- horseshoe, Tuesday, September 2, 2008 1:51 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

yah i keep thinking abt that scene!

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:54 (seventeen years ago)

i find pete highly entertaining - hes so disconnected - borderline autistic

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:55 (seventeen years ago)

he has no soul! but i did feel bad for him in that scene where don was the one he turned to when his dad died for advice on how to be a human. don!!!

horseshoe, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:57 (seventeen years ago)

he is like dwight schrute but more chilling.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 17:57 (seventeen years ago)

It's like The Apartment, only not funny and everyone's a dick! (cept Peggy I guess)

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:03 (seventeen years ago)

pete is so absolutely pathetic and stupid I kind of like him

akm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:05 (seventeen years ago)

sometimes it's a little funny. i sort of agree with you about the adultery thing getting old, though, Dr Morbius.

also maggie siff is the prettiest.

xpost guys, i wouldn't be surprised if pete had 18 dead bodies in his basement.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:06 (seventeen years ago)

o its v funny!

u should get the dvds morbs - youll prob like the show

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:06 (seventeen years ago)

omg the scene where petes mother gave his wife the pink elephant and she just stood there holding it LOOOOOOL i was dying!

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:07 (seventeen years ago)

that was cute. So did a regular character die in plane crash?

I was a peon in ad agencies for 8 years, I probly couldn't stand much more of the show for that reason even tho the pricks in my office couldn't smoke.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:09 (seventeen years ago)

(also, I was hoping their Jackie/Marilyn bra pitch would fly, and then be kamikazed by Marilyn's imminent death)

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:10 (seventeen years ago)

no, nobody they knew died in that crash

akm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:10 (seventeen years ago)

petes dad was in the crash! he only had one scene ever tho

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:10 (seventeen years ago)

roger makes me laugh. and is also a fox.

xpost pete's dad died in the plane crash...not a regular but it's established in the first season that he's a cold bastard (shocker) and his relationship with pete is strained.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:10 (seventeen years ago)

I was a peon in ad agencies for 8 years, I probly couldn't stand much more of the show for that reason even tho the pricks in my office couldn't smoke.

-- Dr Morbius, Tuesday, September 2, 2008 1:09 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

you should probably watch this show!

horseshoe, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:11 (seventeen years ago)

roger says amazing things always

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:12 (seventeen years ago)

no really, after experiencing live account execs and wanting to punch em you don't wanna be "entertained" week after week by such a show.

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:13 (seventeen years ago)

understandable

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:15 (seventeen years ago)

roger is kind of ruined for me as a character because john slattery has played the same guy before on desperate housewives/sex and the city.

Roz, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:17 (seventeen years ago)

she seems to be a person to him, unlike all the other women he knows. he recognizes her.

so true. he respects her because they're kindred spirits in many ways but I think the interesting thing this season is that peggy is starting to realize that she can never be the female don draper, as in her scenes with bobbie last week and joan this week. It's funny that joan says that peggy never takes her advice - the only person who peggy ever listened to before this was don.

Roz, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:19 (seventeen years ago)

well in order to move out of the secretary ghetto peggy had to ignore joans whole worldview - that it worked was a huge blow to her ego

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:32 (seventeen years ago)

but it doesn't really work either way? Peggy loses the little-girl outfits and she's immediately pulled onto their client's lap - it doesn't make her any more respected, just included. It'll be interesting to see where her character goes from here, whether she can continue being an Irene Dunne over a Jackie or Marilyn.

Roz, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:49 (seventeen years ago)

aw, when don tells her she's irene dunne!

horseshoe, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:50 (seventeen years ago)

i know! only good thing don does in the whole episode.

Roz, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:52 (seventeen years ago)

obv sitting on clients laps isnt the way to go - shes just figuring shit out ya know

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:53 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, jhoshea otm. i like how the narrative about peggy's trying to succeed in a man's world is both heavy handed and suspenseful.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:55 (seventeen years ago)

well yeah that's the best thing about peggy, that she doesn't quite know who she is yet. xp

Roz, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 18:55 (seventeen years ago)

the thing is, she is so NOT Irene Dunne!

Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 19:21 (seventeen years ago)

btw in last nights episode pete wonders how the ottomanelli brothers are going to treat him and his guests

OMG STILL THE BEST BUTCHER IN NYC!!!

so good

ice crӕm, Tuesday, 2 September 2008 20:33 (seventeen years ago)

joans really lost some cashe since she got engaged eh - no way roger lets the new girl weasel her way back in otherwise

update prefs (ice crӕm), Wednesday, 10 September 2008 22:58 (seventeen years ago)

btw i realized pete goes tot the ottomanellis in the ues - i was thinking of the one on bleeker - not sure what their relationship is

update prefs (ice crӕm), Wednesday, 10 September 2008 22:59 (seventeen years ago)

WTF with the Mad-Man-date?

Some damn thing (Oilyrags), Wednesday, 10 September 2008 23:33 (seventeen years ago)

^lol. jimmy telling off draper was terrific.

johnny crunch, Thursday, 11 September 2008 02:39 (seventeen years ago)

The opening scene was amazing.

lulz at Draper chucking that beer can.

Carl Magnusssen (petey_carnum), Thursday, 11 September 2008 02:55 (seventeen years ago)

lulz at the ending!

dmr, Thursday, 11 September 2008 03:34 (seventeen years ago)

but yeah the picnic scene was funny

dmr, Thursday, 11 September 2008 03:34 (seventeen years ago)

ending was best part

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Thursday, 11 September 2008 03:41 (seventeen years ago)

so what was up with the car salesman flashback, I didn't really get that

was that woman looking for the don draper who died? and was like, "you're not him"?

assuming there'll be more on that later but also not sure why that made him temporarily not want a Caddy. just bad memries I guess

dmr, Thursday, 11 September 2008 04:51 (seventeen years ago)

I thought that was an excellent episode, and so did a friend of mine, who explained why it seemed especially tight thusly: "In every scene, everybody wanted something." He should write screenplays.

kenan, Thursday, 11 September 2008 07:11 (seventeen years ago)

so what was up with the car salesman flashback, I didn't really get that

was that woman looking for the don draper who died? and was like, "you're not him"?

assuming there'll be more on that later but also not sure why that made him temporarily not want a Caddy. just bad memries I guess

― dmr, Thursday, September 11, 2008 12:51 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Permalink

otm

don although preaching the gospel of leaving yr past behind has yet to full embrace it - a girl child somehow wed puking in teh new caddy cant help - nor can being pwnd by a 2nd rate comedian

btw excellent pwning jimmy - possibly best of the show so far

update prefs (ice crӕm), Thursday, 11 September 2008 07:19 (seventeen years ago)

http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTQ5Mjg3Mzk2OV5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNDI2MTc4MQ@@._V1._CR0,0,113,113_SS90_.jpg yr garbage and u know it

update prefs (ice crӕm), Thursday, 11 September 2008 07:33 (seventeen years ago)

It's the awful truth that gives it that extra oomph.

kenan, Thursday, 11 September 2008 07:34 (seventeen years ago)

totally

also mulholland drive best movie evar

update prefs (ice crӕm), Thursday, 11 September 2008 07:35 (seventeen years ago)

The only (current) program I watch. Am I being hypocritical for disapproving of the era's rampant sexism, while simultaneously wishing that women still looked and dressed like Joan Holloway?

Myonga Vön Bontee, Thursday, 11 September 2008 07:38 (seventeen years ago)

that bitch mad thick srsly

update prefs (ice crӕm), Thursday, 11 September 2008 07:39 (seventeen years ago)

her hed super smal tho

update prefs (ice crӕm), Thursday, 11 September 2008 07:41 (seventeen years ago)

I go home, and I laugh at you.

The moment Carrie made cupcakes cool, Thursday, 11 September 2008 07:44 (seventeen years ago)

harsh toke

update prefs (ice crӕm), Thursday, 11 September 2008 07:47 (seventeen years ago)

RESCREEN! asap

update prefs (ice crӕm), Thursday, 11 September 2008 07:49 (seventeen years ago)

u think bettys vomiting portents a drift toward truth or just an affair w/that tedious man from the stables or both or what

update prefs (ice crӕm), Thursday, 11 September 2008 07:51 (seventeen years ago)

So much in this episode -- don't forget about Jane out-manipulating Joan, and Sal getting way moony over Ken. Another favorite line of dialogue, from Ken looking at the Rothko:

Ken: "It's like looking into something very... deep. You could fall in."

Sal: "That's true. Did someone tell you that?"

Ken: "How could someone tell you that?"

kenan, Thursday, 11 September 2008 07:56 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/nobodyssweetheart/sets/72157606178887453/

hereinfereindryalin (cozwn), Thursday, 11 September 2008 08:00 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, Sal and Ken was the man-date I was talking about. Those two plus Betty - Most Unrequited Love Triangle ever.

Some damn thing (Oilyrags), Thursday, 11 September 2008 12:33 (seventeen years ago)

Sal / Ken thing destined to end v. badly I think

drunken office party confession leads to a punch in the nose from mr. sensitive. or something like that

dmr, Thursday, 11 September 2008 12:58 (seventeen years ago)

the young john mccain should do a cameo in mad men

hereinfereindryalin (cozwn), Thursday, 11 September 2008 13:16 (seventeen years ago)

Sal / Ken thing destined to end v. badly I think

It didn't even begin well. Only a question of *how* badly it will end. Somewhere between heartbreak and grave bodily injury, I'm thinking.

kenan, Thursday, 11 September 2008 14:08 (seventeen years ago)

the dinner party scene was so ridiculously tense and tragic - sal treating his wife so poorly - ken oblivious

update prefs (ice crӕm), Thursday, 11 September 2008 14:13 (seventeen years ago)

btw i realized pete goes tot the ottomanellis in the ues - i was thinking of the one on bleeker - not sure what their relationship is

as i understand it the various ottomanelli butcher shops are run by members of the same extended family, but aren't affiliated with each other. ues and bleecker st owners are cousins, i think? i actually bothered to find this out once upon a time; it's good nyc history.

was that woman looking for the don draper who died?

i was wondering when we were going to get back to this. you'd think that there would be at least a few people who remembered the real don draper.

lauren, Thursday, 11 September 2008 14:25 (seventeen years ago)

so ridiculously tense and tragic - sal treating his wife so poorly

Tragic is otm. Because otherwise, Sal is the nicest person on the show, probably. Genial and sharp and always with the tie that stands out -- it's impossible not to like him (even if he does looks like a comic book superhero, which is a bit odd). And doubly tragic because his poor sweet wife doesn't seem to have the first clue what's up.

so glitchy (kenan), Friday, 12 September 2008 01:19 (seventeen years ago)

he's keeping ken's lighter close to his heart ;_;

dmr, Friday, 12 September 2008 02:03 (seventeen years ago)

it's actually closer to his crotch, no?

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Friday, 12 September 2008 02:30 (seventeen years ago)

That's the trouble with his predicament, innit?

As Oates once said to Hall, "Get your dick out of your heart!"

so glitchy (kenan), Friday, 12 September 2008 02:45 (seventeen years ago)

total lulz at ending

The 69, 666, 420th Beatle (latebloomer), Friday, 12 September 2008 17:42 (seventeen years ago)

No one? I thought the priest was fixing to do something immoral with Peggy, but now it appears he may simply wish to save her..

Finefinemusic, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 01:09 (seventeen years ago)

I only intermittently catch this show and can't follow the continuity at all when I do but I gotta say it is always rewarding. Last one I saw invovled Draper buying an expensive new car and being told he was a shitbag byt the TV comedian, followed by his wife puking in the car and then cut-roll credits = good shit

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 15:31 (seventeen years ago)

or was that the latest episode...? gay Sal dinner party scene was aces

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 15:32 (seventeen years ago)

the one you're talking about is the second-most-recent episode

dmr, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 15:50 (seventeen years ago)

joan has the biggest hips of any woman ive ever seen

gr8080 (max), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 15:51 (seventeen years ago)

liked the Joan plot this week .... she wants the Peggy I-have-a-real-career path now

dmr, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 15:52 (seventeen years ago)

aw the Joan plot was heartbreaking. fuck that fiance of hers.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 15:52 (seventeen years ago)

She's got an honest to goodness hourglass shape, but I think costume is making a big difference.

http://images.google.com/images?q=christina+hendricks

xp - and fuck that new guy in the TV dept. too!

There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 15:53 (seventeen years ago)

yeah definitely sad when they took the scripts away

dmr, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 15:55 (seventeen years ago)

its the Howitzer shell bras! but yeah she is va-va-voomed out

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 15:55 (seventeen years ago)

I think costume is making a big difference

saw her on some talk show where she said they have to wear all 50s-era bras and ridiculous girdles and shit

lol xpost

dmr, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 15:56 (seventeen years ago)

She must be pregnant, right? (I hope not - that would bum me out for more than one reason.)

Myonga Vön Bontee, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 15:56 (seventeen years ago)

(The character, not the actress, that is.)

Myonga Vön Bontee, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 15:57 (seventeen years ago)

I thought the priest was fixing to do something immoral with Peggy, but now it appears he may simply wish to save her.

that's actually one of my favorite things about the show, how it sort of sets up what seem like typical soap-opera situations but then lets them unfold with less drama and predictability than you think. it is soapy, but it's soapy in a sort of slow-burn way. i like the low-keyness of it, that it can make plot points out of sneaking into an office for a peek at a rothko or what beer a character buys for dinner.

tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:04 (seventeen years ago)

xpost She must be pregnant, right?

I was wondering the same.. doesn't she seem a lot bigger and even sort of frumpier this season than last? Am I hallucinating? I was sad they took the scripts from her too, tsk. The downfall of being too good at your job!

Finefinemusic, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:08 (seventeen years ago)

i would not call her "frumpy," no.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:10 (seventeen years ago)

Would they do two preggers storylines in a row? Doesn't seem likely.

There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:10 (seventeen years ago)

I didn't think the back to back storylines made sense either but there is no doubt that this season's Joan is not as put together as last seasons'.. possibly she's unhappy and coming apart at the seams (haha)? I just am not getting the same polished effect from her this season.

Finefinemusic, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:14 (seventeen years ago)

The downfall of being too good at your job!

to me the point was that it would not even occur to anyone that she could do the job permanently, or would want to. they think she'd rather just "walk around being stared at" (a job description she herself probably would have embraced until recently but now is starting to see the light ... )

dmr, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:14 (seventeen years ago)

i thought something more was going to happen with the alcoholic at the dinner, but they kind of sidestepped the whole thing; he asked for tomato juice, but then almost delibertely didn't show if he drank anything during dinner and in fact, didn't show the dinner at all. which seemed weird.

akm, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:15 (seventeen years ago)

I thought it was just showing how hard it is to be around all these people offering you a drink every two minutes. Betty poured him wine for dinner but it didn't show whether he drank it

that was another heartbreaker a few episodes ago, where he almost fell off the wagon and then shoved the dog out the door

dmr, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:31 (seventeen years ago)

i don't think that joan is any less put together this season by any means, but she's really hit a wall. the wily feminine philosophy that she tried so hard to impose on peggy has kind of collapsed under her. she's been outmaneuvered by the new girl, she no longer has roger's protection, the prized fiance that she worked so hard to get isn't going to let her be the boss, and just as she discovers that maybe she does want to be a part of the man's world that she derided in earlier episodes, her chance is taken away from her.

lauren, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:32 (seventeen years ago)

xpost - poor chauncey. :(

lauren, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:32 (seventeen years ago)

that was another heartbreaker a few episodes ago, where he almost fell off the wagon and then shoved the dog out the door

i thought it was pretty clear that he did fall off the wagon, he put the dog outside so it wouldn't watch him.

akm, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:35 (seventeen years ago)

It's very tough for me to take even imaginary cruelty to dogs. I wanted to skin that fucker alive for that.

There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:35 (seventeen years ago)

lauren otm about Joan--i feel like all the heavy-handed see, this is 1950's style sexism moments throughout the series are being redeemed in her storyline.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:36 (seventeen years ago)

and despite the heavy-handedness, i think that the show does a good job in showing the toxic effects on both sexes.

lauren, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:38 (seventeen years ago)

> i thought it was pretty clear that he did fall off the wagon, he put the dog outside so it wouldn't watch him.

Hmmm...I didn't see it that way at all. I thought he was bugged by the connection to his married life and the finality of the split because of his wife's remarriage. But you could be right.

There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:39 (seventeen years ago)

Didn't Duck refuse a drink during cocktails but say he might have a glass of wine with dinner?

Michael White, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:40 (seventeen years ago)

easy to see it both ways. whatever the case may be, i think they're going to play out the uncertainty angle for a while, though.

xpost

lauren, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:41 (seventeen years ago)

to get back to the draper family: i'd love to see sally draper in 10 years.

lauren, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:43 (seventeen years ago)

that poor girl

horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:43 (seventeen years ago)

she might end up like my mom, and just do a lot of drugs, or she might end up like my aunt, and move to colorado and become a buddhist

gr8080 (max), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:46 (seventeen years ago)

that's actually one of my favorite things about the show, how it sort of sets up what seem like typical soap-opera situations but then lets them unfold with less drama and predictability than you think. it is soapy, but it's soapy in a sort of slow-burn way. i like the low-keyness of it, that it can make plot points out of sneaking into an office for a peek at a rothko or what beer a character buys for dinner.

sooo OTM - I was just trying to figure out for myself why I love this show so much despite the soap-iness.

Man this season's fucking bleak - every character seems so lonely.

casino royale with cheese (Roz), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:53 (seventeen years ago)

she might end up like my mom, and just do a lot of drugs, or she might end up like my aunt, and move to colorado and become a buddhist

that's another thing i like about it, that's it's so knowingly perched on the edge of all these things that the audience and writers know are coming down the line. it's entertaining to think about what each of the characters is going to be doing in 1968 or 1975 or 1982.

tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:57 (seventeen years ago)

the show is so restrained--you keep expecting it to blow up into these intense fights or confrontations and instead it just ends with betty barfing

gr8080 (max), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:58 (seventeen years ago)

which says so much than more than a big dramatic scene.

looooved Betty's dress this ep - would wear that all day long too, though prob not while moping over my cheating husband.

casino royale with cheese (Roz), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 17:59 (seventeen years ago)

*so much than more

casino royale with cheese (Roz), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:00 (seventeen years ago)

And I loved the apron that went with it, Roz.

Michael White, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:01 (seventeen years ago)

i wish bohemian girlfriend would come back

akm, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:01 (seventeen years ago)

yeah the whole look was so great! xp

casino royale with cheese (Roz), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:02 (seventeen years ago)

joan's at-home outfit was a+, too. made me regret giving away my vintage ski sweaters.

lauren, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:03 (seventeen years ago)

YES I COVET JOAN'S AT-HOME OUTFIT OMGGGGGGGGG

horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:15 (seventeen years ago)

so fucking cute

horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:15 (seventeen years ago)

it was nice, too, not to see her quite as locked-and-loaded as she is in her workwear, formidable as it is.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:15 (seventeen years ago)

yeah and she sounded so perky and enthusiastic in that scene - kinda very not joan. usually she has that cool, husky thing going on.

casino royale with cheese (Roz), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:18 (seventeen years ago)

she's always in character at work.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:18 (seventeen years ago)

Joan looked stunning at home!

i wish bohemian girlfriend would come back

Yeah, I miss Midge.

Michael White, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:20 (seventeen years ago)

> she's always in character at work.

On the cute, upturned nose.

There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:20 (seventeen years ago)

heh to be fair, they're all in character at work.

casino royale with cheese (Roz), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:22 (seventeen years ago)

is don ever out of character?

lauren, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:24 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, but sexy secretary is more of an archetype than, i don't know, sociopathic account exec. or maybe not...

horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:24 (seventeen years ago)

i think jon hamm really earns his check in the moments when you think don just HAS to break character and he somehow doesn't.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:25 (seventeen years ago)

like when his marriage threatens to dissolve.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:25 (seventeen years ago)

I think Jon Hamm earns his check in the subtle ways he reacts to Betty's accusations that don't break character (I don't think people really do that much)so much as show it being less unflappable than he leads on.

Michael White, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:30 (seventeen years ago)

i always read draper as still trying to figure out his 'character'!

gr8080 (max), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:35 (seventeen years ago)

jon hamm does great for example, in those moments when duck brings up betty and her amazing hosting skills and don looks just momentarily, almost imperceptibly, pained before continuing on as normal.

casino royale with cheese (Roz), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:37 (seventeen years ago)

i think that is true in moments like when betty asks him if he hates her, like he actually has no idea if he does are not.

xpost

horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:38 (seventeen years ago)

it seems like most of the other characters--in particular betty, joan, sterling--have a good sense of who they're supposed to be, and they play that character to the fullest--every time i watch don its like hes trying to figure out how he should react and what he should say. and i think because most of the other characters (and viewers!) assume that don is confident and capable and totally unflappable, they take that slow & calculated response as measured intelligence & maturity or whatever...

gr8080 (max), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:40 (seventeen years ago)

^^also why he and peggy come off as so perfectly alike - they're both unsure of who they need to be, peggy just more obviously so.

casino royale with cheese (Roz), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:45 (seventeen years ago)

peggy is unsure because she's trying to do a thing that violates gender codes, don is unsure because he's trying to leave behind an entire life.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:47 (seventeen years ago)

but yeah, i think they identify with each other.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:47 (seventeen years ago)

btw i think its to jon hamm & the writers' credit that its always pretty unclear whether or not don has any idea what hes doing--they are hell of milking "performativity" and ill tell u what i am eating it up w/ all my lol-college-post-structuralist spoons

gr8080 (max), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:48 (seventeen years ago)

I was a little surprised that Betty is still dresssing "like a little girl" at the office, even though her try at sexiness while hanging with the men was an abject failure.

There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:49 (seventeen years ago)

Not that she wasn't sexy - that it didn't get her the respect she clearly hoped for.

There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:49 (seventeen years ago)

jon hamm is really great. it is quite a feat to get me to dislike such a handsome man.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:49 (seventeen years ago)

gnarf - Peggy, not Betty.

There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:50 (seventeen years ago)

Speaking of Betty, though, I expect the season will end with her fucking some other guy. Not Ken, though. If it's Sal, that would be extra fucked up.

There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:52 (seventeen years ago)

"I was a little surprised that Betty is still dresssing "like a little girl" at the office, even though her try at sexiness while hanging with the men was an abject failure."

Peggy has lost a good deal of weight and though she dresses like a decent Catholic girl, she's a little less dowdy and a little more pared down. Also, I don't know why you think it was an abject failure when she got dressed to attend the celebration with the client. She managed to piss of Pete Campbell and that was probably half her fun right there.

Michael White, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:55 (seventeen years ago)

they are hell of milking "performativity" and ill tell u what i am eating it up w/ all my lol-college-post-structuralist spoons

i'm 10 yrs out of college - what's my excuse?

lauren, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:57 (seventeen years ago)

every time i watch don its like hes trying to figure out how he should react and what he should say.

otm. not just in the sense of "gotta stay in character" but he's tamped down his emotions so much that he's thinking "how would a 'real' human being react to this"

dmr, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 18:58 (seventeen years ago)

> She managed to piss of Pete Campbell and that was probably half her fun right there.

Haha! True that, but more than that she wants to be considered an equal by the other execs, and she's def. NOT. Joan (as mentioned above) has just now realized this is even a possibility, and she wants it too. Joan understands people better, though, and I bet she leapfrogs Peggy in respect in one of next season's major storylines.

There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:00 (seventeen years ago)

stupid question: is the show called mad men because:

a) they're ad men?
b) they work on MADison ave?

doo doo doo doo doo (heartbreaker) (get bent), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:47 (seventeen years ago)

b.

hmmmm, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:47 (seventeen years ago)

its because they're all fucking bonkers

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:48 (seventeen years ago)

is she pete's old secretary?

leighten up, meester! (Lamp), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:49 (seventeen years ago)

were dudes in the "golden age of advertising" actually called mad men?

doo doo doo doo doo (heartbreaker) (get bent), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:50 (seventeen years ago)

There's a title card at the beginning of the first episode that explains the title, literally anyway:

"Mad Men: A term coined in the late 1950's the describe the advertising executives of Madison Avenue. They coined it."

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:53 (seventeen years ago)

yep according to interview with creator (Weiner?) on NPR

will, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:53 (seventeen years ago)

i worked on madison ave for a while (not in advertising). the show makes me nostalgic for the oyster bar in grand central.

doo doo doo doo doo (heartbreaker) (get bent), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)

When Joan got passed over for the job she was doing so well at the TV dept., I was so bummed for her.

Michael White, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 20:04 (seventeen years ago)

i wasn't really... she's been such a beeyotch, i always giggle when she gets her comeuppance.

doo doo doo doo doo (heartbreaker) (get bent), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 20:05 (seventeen years ago)

it seems obvious that nobody in the office likes joan, and she's started to notice that her novelty value (as eye candy) has worn off among the boys. so she figures the only way people will pay attention to her is if she acts like peggy. (is joan's new squeaky high voice her way of peggying herself up?)

doo doo doo doo doo (heartbreaker) (get bent), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 20:11 (seventeen years ago)

Isn't the other part of the Joan plot that when she tries to play at The Man's Game, she still lets part of her real personality show through (squeeing at the upcoming soap plotlines, "you won't believe what's coming up"/"you've made an unmissable show" etc etc). Although how much of this is her realising that her days as secretarial queen bee are over and how much is her wanting to get away from her husband I don't know.

Carrie Bradshaw Layfield (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Tuesday, 16 September 2008 22:16 (seventeen years ago)

I thought that was her being quite effective at ad sales, actually.

Michael White, Tuesday, 16 September 2008 22:20 (seventeen years ago)

I loved the revelation that Joan's fiancee isn't technically a doctor yet (unless I'm not remembering it correctly). When it comes to Joan this season, I'm reminded of the bit where they posted her drivers license to reveal that she's in her 30's in the first season, and how embarrassed she was.

This show has the best final shots around. I loved Betty puking so abruptly, and Don getting the beer out of the fridge and revealing himself to be in the office was great.

Gukbe, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 07:06 (seventeen years ago)

the fiance is in his final year of residency, i think?

lauren, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 14:03 (seventeen years ago)

How much money on Betty sleeping with horse-riding dude next episode?

Doghouse O RLY (G00blar), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 14:36 (seventeen years ago)

too obvious

doo doo doo doo doo (heartbreaker) (get bent), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 21:00 (seventeen years ago)

the horse then?

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 21:03 (seventeen years ago)

As I said upthread, it'll be a season ending cliffhanger, so it's still a few episodes away. I dunno who, but probably not anyone from Don's office.

There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 21:06 (seventeen years ago)

my money's on cooper

doo doo doo doo doo (heartbreaker) (get bent), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 21:08 (seventeen years ago)

I think she may kill herself actually. Or try to kill him.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 21:31 (seventeen years ago)

But it probably won't be anything so dramatic as infidelity, suicide or murder. The cliffhanger'll probably be that she burned a cake or something.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 21:32 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, Birdie having a revenge affair is not just way too soap-y, it's not her style. And she has mad style. Anyone who can destroy furniture without losing her composure is a special person indeed.

so glitchy (kenan), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 21:40 (seventeen years ago)

Bets will be out boffing horse riding dude while unattended klutzy little Draper jr inadvertently burns down the house.

Stevie T, Wednesday, 17 September 2008 21:41 (seventeen years ago)

I'd be very surprised if she has any more sexual a relationship with stable boy than she did with with the kid she gave her hair to. He called her "deeply sad," or something to that effect. And while she needs someone to see that, it's not hotness. That kind of line only works on college girls. Flaky ones, at that.

so glitchy (kenan), Wednesday, 17 September 2008 21:47 (seventeen years ago)

what line works now?

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Thursday, 18 September 2008 02:39 (seventeen years ago)

It's funny where this talk has gone.

Back to Mad Men - Peggy desrves the power she has, Draper can flail away and still come out alright. Joan ...she has JUST AS MUCH power in a way - she is Trusted to keep lots of secrets.

aimurchie, Thursday, 18 September 2008 03:26 (seventeen years ago)

I have to go to sleep. But thank you, and xxoo to you all!

aimurchie, Thursday, 18 September 2008 03:28 (seventeen years ago)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3213/2864106466_7ce7e4bc23_o.jpg

Have we done these yet?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/nobodyssweetheart/sets/72157606178887453/detail/

Carrie Bradshaw Layfield (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Thursday, 18 September 2008 14:38 (seventeen years ago)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3291/2728248750_64e6ff4c87_b.jpg

*Gulp*

Michael White, Thursday, 18 September 2008 14:58 (seventeen years ago)

damn that last ep was one of the best eps of anything.

broken_britan (special guest stars mark bronson), Thursday, 18 September 2008 23:45 (seventeen years ago)

The episode this week was ...kind of slow. Peeing your pants, really??

Finefinemusic, Monday, 29 September 2008 15:39 (seventeen years ago)

i liked the night out w/freddie. thought the twist at the end w/roger was a bit much.

tipsy mothra, Monday, 29 September 2008 15:42 (seventeen years ago)

yeah major lols @ roger running w/ don's drunken ramblings

johnny crunch, Monday, 29 September 2008 15:44 (seventeen years ago)

I thought the twist was great, predictable and totally out of left field at the same time.

Alex in SF, Monday, 29 September 2008 22:59 (seventeen years ago)

lots of good commentary about this episode on the basket of kisses fansite.

christian bailout (get bent), Monday, 29 September 2008 23:25 (seventeen years ago)

starting season 1 tomorrow

Jordan, Monday, 29 September 2008 23:25 (seventeen years ago)

Season 1 is great, do not miss, but watching episodes again now, it feels almost like it's all setup. Season 2 has so far been *so* much heavier, denser, better. Not near as much winking this season, and a lot more "Oh, man. Ouch."

Peeing your pants, really??

I don't doubt they did their research, since they do with every other tiny detail of the show, but as drunk as I have been, it is difficult to imagine being so desperately alcoholic that you could seem fine one second, pee yourself, snap out of it and seem fine for ten more seconds, and then pass out. Sterling caled it "conduct unbecoming," I call it wayyy over the edge and a bit frightening.

so glitchy (kenan), Monday, 29 September 2008 23:39 (seventeen years ago)

"(also, I was hoping their Jackie/Marilyn bra pitch would fly, and then be kamikazed by Marilyn's imminent death)"

This gets mentioned!

Alex in SF, Monday, 29 September 2008 23:40 (seventeen years ago)

Yes, directly! Peggy says something like, "Good thing they didn't go with the Marilyn idea," or some such.

so glitchy (kenan), Monday, 29 September 2008 23:41 (seventeen years ago)

The interplay between Peggy and Don this season has been so amazing. The acting is just marvelous across the board though.

Alex in SF, Monday, 29 September 2008 23:42 (seventeen years ago)

i loved dons excuse - my kid is sick - yes don your wife is kind of a child

roger in love w/joan compensates w/dons secretary - tragic him n joan are perfect for each other - what a wonderfully zingy life theyd share

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:20 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i <3 roger and joan

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:21 (seventeen years ago)

Oh that's mean. Joan shouldn't get stuck with a dickhead like Roger.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:24 (seventeen years ago)

roger is the awesomest

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:27 (seventeen years ago)

Ew.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:28 (seventeen years ago)

suggest ban

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:28 (seventeen years ago)

Poor joan though, because, what kind of dickhead *should* she get stuck with? She has to wonder that a lot.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:29 (seventeen years ago)

joan and roger are both brilliant charismatic jerks - and yet they deny destiny - wtf

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:33 (seventeen years ago)

fuck that playing house w/some doof bullshit

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:34 (seventeen years ago)

I don't think joan is a jerk at all. Of all the jerks in that office, she's maybe the only one who's forthright. Manipulative at times, but she'll tell you how and why.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:36 (seventeen years ago)

tell us abt what happens when roger rears his head and comes into ilx airspace

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:39 (seventeen years ago)

me? what?

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:41 (seventeen years ago)

yes u yr post makes no sense so i compared u to palin!

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:43 (seventeen years ago)

mad men shares a narrow maritime border with reality

tilden katz (get bent), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:44 (seventeen years ago)

Joan doesn't strike me as a jerk at all.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:45 (seventeen years ago)

xpost It really does.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:45 (seventeen years ago)

I can see it from my house.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:46 (seventeen years ago)

she's kind of a jerk. to Paul's girlfriend when he had that party, for example. i dig her, but no one on this show is really not a jerk except maybe for Peggy.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:49 (seventeen years ago)

Peggy who pretends she does not have a child?

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:50 (seventeen years ago)

i think you need a more complicated word than "jerk" for that situation! but, yeah, she'll probably be a jerk soon enough!

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:52 (seventeen years ago)

i think don is a good guy in spite of his jerkiness (nb: he is still a jerk)

tilden katz (get bent), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:52 (seventeen years ago)

ok kenan first u say shes no a jerk then include her in her in yr grouping of "all the jerks in the office". then you imply that the definition of jerk is one who is not forthright and finish it all off by admitting that joan is highly manipulative as if that just couldnt be a characteristic of a jerk.

and gdamn alex have u bothered to notice how shes treated peggy the new girl paul etc

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:53 (seventeen years ago)

don isn't really a jerk, he's an ASSHOLE

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:53 (seventeen years ago)

don has genuine sympathy for some people but hes much too damaged to know himself at all

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:55 (seventeen years ago)

but yah don is much too potent to be a garden variety jerkface

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:56 (seventeen years ago)

As for Peggy, she nailed it herself when she said to Joan, "You really think you're helping, don't you?" As for the new girl, she's scary manipulative, and that exactly what Don can smell on her that made him demand she be gone. And as for Paul, that was uncalled for, but it was a nice dressing-down for his being an intolerable hipster.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:57 (seventeen years ago)

i just meant he's not a casual jerk the way other characters are + sometimes he's quite sensitive about things they're not, but he has these dark pockets of awfulness.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:58 (seventeen years ago)

Joan's stuff w/ Peggy is complicated though. Some of it's mean, but some of it is also well-meaning.

The new girl though? Give me a break.

Paul's a yutz. Everything she said to and/or about him was totally and completely true.

Anyway even if she is a jerk, she's doesn't deserve Roger.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:58 (seventeen years ago)

and as for Paul's girlfriend? i thought that stood out because it was unnecessary.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 00:59 (seventeen years ago)

just cause somethings true, just cause you think youre helping, doesnt mean youre not being a jerk.

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:01 (seventeen years ago)

SHE WAS MEAN TO PAUL'S GIRLFRIEND WHOM SHE HAD JUST MET BASICALLY BECAUSE SHE WAS BLACK. SHE IS V. BEAUTIFUL AND I LOVE HER CLOTHES TOO BUT SHE IS KIND OF A JERK.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:02 (seventeen years ago)

Last week's episode was easily the best of the entire show, so I wasn't terribly upset that last night didn't match its greatness. There were some great scenes though (sucker-punching Jimmy, Betty bailing on lunch).

BTW, the casting for Jimmy Barrett is just genius. I remember that actor from that incredibly fucked-up dumped scene in Mulholland Drive and no one does that vacant and sinister freakiness like that dude.

Bill in Chicago, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:02 (seventeen years ago)

her and roger have amazing chemistry and absolutely deserve each other even if joan does have awesome hueg boobs youd love to fall asleep between

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:04 (seventeen years ago)

I have to grant the point that she was mean to Paul's girlfriend because she was black, or more broadly beneath Paul's station, which is just as bad or worse, framing-wise. But her little polemic to Paul didn't feel untrue. Why IS he dating a grocery checkout girl, if not to prove how tolerant he is? Sticky area, I know, but it didn't feel especially unfair to Paul when she said that to him.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:07 (seventeen years ago)

she was trying to hurt his feelings

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:09 (seventeen years ago)

i don't give a shit about what she said to Paul, i am saying she was indisuputably an asshole to his girlfriend!

also uh @ Why IS he dating a grocery checkout girl, if not to prove how tolerant he is?

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:09 (seventeen years ago)

I remember that actor from that incredibly fucked-up dumped scene in Mulholland Drive

Yes, thank you! I knew I knew him from somewhere, and it bugged me, but not enough to look it up.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:10 (seventeen years ago)

i am saying she was indisuputably an asshole to his girlfriend!

Not arguing here.

also uh @

Uh oh. These are the things that race threads are spawned of. :(

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:11 (seventeen years ago)

how abt if don walked up to her and said hey joan freaked out abt getting old huh say hello to yr boring bullshit fiance for me u lowly secretary lol

how would you like that KENAN huh

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:12 (seventeen years ago)

or what if pete campbell said it PETE CAMPBELL

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:13 (seventeen years ago)

Anyone's jerk/not jerk status is relative to the fact that they're all jerks who work at the jerkstore. But the relative part is important.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:14 (seventeen years ago)

whatever i'm not trying to make a federal case of it, and that observation as you phrased it isn't about race, unless you secretly meant it to be; i just think that reading of paul's relationship, which we basically know nothing about, is pretty close to Joan's reading which seems problematic given her jerkiness to said girlfriend.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:14 (seventeen years ago)

if it's all relative i would like to bring up the fact that roger is a fox. anyway jhoshea is otm they clearly really dig each other.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:15 (seventeen years ago)

it's always a relief to me when that happens on this show, like with don and rachel last season, it's like right these people aren't all anaesthetized sociopaths all the time.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:16 (seventeen years ago)

lol kenan u backpedaling

but anyway on the relative jerkiness scale of sterling cooper id put joan somewhere in the middle - a median sort of hawt awesome jerk

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:17 (seventeen years ago)

is pretty close to Joan's reading which seems problematic given her jerkiness to said girlfriend

You're right. I wasn't setting out to defend it.

But is it wrong to read into Paul's neck kerchief and the bragging about his amazing bottle of whatever and the new edgy beard that he's a little bit full of shit? I think he's kind of supposed to be the guy who is uncomfortably trying to square off his social class with the newest of the new styles, and it's not at all unthinkable that his black girlfriend is another accessory.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:21 (seventeen years ago)

i mean a lot of the relationships in this show seem to serve as accessories (lol salvatore + his woman :(), so no it's not unthinkable, but joan jumped to that conclusion as soon as she saw Paul's girlfriend basically, and a person is not the same as a neck kerchief.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:24 (seventeen years ago)

Fair enough.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:25 (seventeen years ago)

using only the most general jerk definition and not differentiating between jerks and asshole as elucidate by horseshoe upthread i present to you the mad men jerkladder

pete
bert
don
duck
roger
joan
ken
betty
paul
peggy
salvatore
harry

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:28 (seventeen years ago)

<3 i was about to try to do that.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:29 (seventeen years ago)

i am sort of in love with harry for reasons that are unclear to me

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:29 (seventeen years ago)

Only ad people (Betty doesn't count):

Pete
Roger
Duck (fuck for the dog thing maybe he should be #1)
Bert
Paul
Ken
Don
Freddie
Joan
Salvatore
Harry
Peggy

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:34 (seventeen years ago)

i think jerk is pretty strong for most of these characters. flawed, certainly, but (aside from the secretary) we all have a pretty good understanding as to why they are the way are. but perhaps i'm thinking of the one-dimensional version of jerk.

Gukbe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:35 (seventeen years ago)

I don't consider not wanting a baby to be evidence of jerkiness btw.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:36 (seventeen years ago)

I'm not clear on why Pete is the way he is, either, though. Rich parents don't go nearly far enough to cover his rudeness, impertinence, complete lack of morals (worse than Don, I'd say), and general oily film.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:38 (seventeen years ago)

at night pete rips off his human mask to reveal his terrifying insect visage

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:38 (seventeen years ago)

there is no accounting for him

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:38 (seventeen years ago)

as mentioned above the madmen jerkladder™ is constructed using a generally broad jerk definition

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:39 (seventeen years ago)

I'm also not sure Joan was mean to Paul's girlfriend because she was black. That was a moment of unnecessary meanesss though, I will concede.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:39 (seventeen years ago)

i was unsure how to read that moment, to be honest, but it was at the very least...racially insensitive, bc she was basically like, "hey, i never knew Paul was open-minded" i.e, "hello, black girl; we're all white!"

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:40 (seventeen years ago)

its been pretty well demonstrated that pete parents are more than rich - some sort of barely human weirdos it seems

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:40 (seventeen years ago)

joan is srsly still mad at paul for whatever he did in season 0

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:41 (seventeen years ago)

Lady knows how to hold a grudge, for certain. Her campaign against Sterling is just beginning, seems like.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:43 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah next episode will be interesting. Can't wait to see what Joan will do?

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:44 (seventeen years ago)

yeah her meanness to Paul is clearly about that, but i find that meanness charming. i am kind of a jerk.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:44 (seventeen years ago)

Well Paul is kind of a jerk.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:45 (seventeen years ago)

Paul vs. Ken was the hardest ranking.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:46 (seventeen years ago)

o joan is mega charismatic and fun and i have no problem reveling in her zinginess - just to be clear

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:46 (seventeen years ago)

I think "Rich Parents" is a bit too simple from what we've seen of Pete's life. He seems to feel emasculated at every turn, and the rejection of Don leading him to Duck was a pretty important moment. This among countless other reasons.

Joan's response to Paul's girlfriend was mean, but she's been cracking all season. I think it was more along the lines of jealousy than anything else (He was madly in love with her and would be the kind of progressive boyfriend she would probably have wanted and she rejected him).

Gukbe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:46 (seventeen years ago)

Paul is not progressive. He's just a pretender to progressiveness. He's the same kind of retrogade jerk as the rest of them.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:48 (seventeen years ago)

guys pete is just fuuuuuuucked up. he has dad issues, clearly, but i don't think that accounts for how alarming he is.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:49 (seventeen years ago)

paul and kens only real flat out aggression has been toward each other and paul started it so i ranked him ahead - theyre both pretty self indulgent and clueless

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:49 (seventeen years ago)

and yah pete is a sociopath who im sure sits atop nearly everyones internal mad men jerkladder

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:50 (seventeen years ago)

I think that is very likely, but I doubt Joan realizes that, the same way she probably doesn't realize what she's really looking for in life at the time.

Of course, I basically adore this show so much that I might be making excuses. I love the characters.

xxpost

Gukbe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:50 (seventeen years ago)

pete is kind of a creepy sociopath, from what appears to be a family of creepy sociopaths.

xposts

lauren, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:52 (seventeen years ago)

agreed

\\\\\\\\YES//////// (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:53 (seventeen years ago)

re: joan, i don't think that she was even jealous of paul's girlfriend for being his girlfriend. she just strikes out at anything/anyone, like a child. she's very calculating, but in a pretty short-sighted way that's very teenaged.

lauren, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:54 (seventeen years ago)

otm. Witness the scene with her and her doctor, where she's just as little-girly as she can muster. She seems lost. (Um... like everyone on the show.)

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 01:58 (seventeen years ago)

her fiancee? I saw that as being her attempting to act like she thought she was supposed to, as though her finally settling down into the role she thought she was supposed to do was an ill-fit for her.

Gukbe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:01 (seventeen years ago)

Yes, that's exactly what I mean!

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:05 (seventeen years ago)

calling pete a "sociopath" is stretching it a bit. he's merely a self-centered twerp, like almost everyone else on the show.

Brosef Stalin (latebloomer), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:07 (seventeen years ago)

no, really. pete is scary. mark my words.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:08 (seventeen years ago)

i would NOT be able to work in an office with pete as long as these people have.

tilden katz (get bent), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:09 (seventeen years ago)

on the other hand, it looks like don and the others get a lot of pleasure out of not letting him win, so it's a reason to stay!

tilden katz (get bent), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:10 (seventeen years ago)

re: Joan, and maybe re: why I don't think she's a jerk: She's an ill-fit for the world she's in no matter what she does. She's eked herself out a role as head hen of the office, which suits her well enough, but she's a long way from happy with it. She'd rather be reading scripts for the television department ("department"), for instance, and she knows she'd be a lot more "respectable" if she were married to a doctor, but she's not taken seriously by the men at the office, and certainly not by her husband, and in the latter situation, she seems to not even pay due respect to herself. I think "teenaged" is, given the environment, a bit of an accomplishment, since women in general are only expected to be little girls. She's impetuous and mean sometimes, yes, but she's way up in the top tier of likable characters.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:17 (seventeen years ago)

this is true of all the women, though? i mean, she's smarter than some of the female characters, but i take it that this is one of the central things the show is about? it is moving.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:20 (seventeen years ago)

oh, i love joan. i don't like her much, but she's one of my favorites.

lauren, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:20 (seventeen years ago)

she and betty are a lot alike, i think.

lauren, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:21 (seventeen years ago)

and yet i kind of can't stand betty.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:21 (seventeen years ago)

they seem like the two sides of the coin, if you'll excuse my use of a terrible cliche.

lauren, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:22 (seventeen years ago)

At any rate, by now the implication that Betty is just a little girl should seem pretty sour.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:23 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, i feel really bad for Betty and i don't know how she's ever going to fix all the stuff that sucks in her life, but i don't like her.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:24 (seventeen years ago)

I think if you get hung up on liking any of these characters, you're not going to be rewarded. But that's okay, because they have more to say than that.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:26 (seventeen years ago)

i do think that "sociopath" isn't that far off the mark with regard to pete. he has no regard for the others, to the point where he's surprised if they actually object to being mistreated or used; he has no idea what normal social interaction entails beyond this weird bluff heartiness that he's obviously practiced after seeing other people behave that way; he's manipulative as he can within the confines of his somewhat limited intelligence; he's shown a capacity for cruelty, etc etc.

lauren, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:26 (seventeen years ago)

Really I am kind of in awe of Matthew Weiner and the characters he has created.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:27 (seventeen years ago)

yes, that is all very otm and i would not be surprised if he ends up killing someone or something.

xpost

horseshoe, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:28 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i guess it's because he's such a clueless putz that i don't see him as a "sociopath", but obviously being an incompetent sociopath doesn't negate being one.

Brosef Stalin (latebloomer), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:31 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah – that episode where his father dies and he has no clue how to feel or how to react was the only time I ever felt any kind of sympathy for the guy.

Roz, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:32 (seventeen years ago)

Take away the constraints of time, and Pete would be the perfect guy to be beaten to death on the main street of Deadwood.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:34 (seventeen years ago)

I see Pete more as Hearst actually (or Hearst's lackey.)

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:37 (seventeen years ago)

My moment of empathy for Pete was that episode where he nearly gets fired, but doesn't, but then at the end of the episode he goes home to his high-rise apartment with a view the upper east side of Manhattan, Chrysler Building and all, and you can see it through his eyes -- it's a trap. He built it himself, but even so.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:40 (seventeen years ago)

xpost Wow, yeah, a lot like that.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 02:41 (seventeen years ago)

How is Bert Cooper a jerk?

jaymc, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 04:47 (seventeen years ago)

He fired someone for having gum in their mouth IIRC.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 04:57 (seventeen years ago)

I think January Jones is doing a great job with depressive-Betty. All last season she was perfect on the outside, while you knew she was secretly tormented, and the last couple of episodes even that facade has broken away. Usually when TV does depression it's very one-note, but I think here it is conveyed not only in her clothing/carriage, but also subtly in her facial expressions and voice. Not over the top, but very believable, and such a change from the previous iteration of her character. It does a lot to bring Betty closer to a contemporary framework as well, I think--she seems somehow like a more immediate, relatible character, rather than a picture-perfect 60s housewife.

Virginia Plain, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 05:25 (seventeen years ago)

How is Bert Cooper a jerk?

well he's an ayn rand fan, to start. more generally he's an old-school elitist. (e.g. his rap to don about how a small group of people run the world.) even his eccentricities feel arrogant -- everyone has to take off their shoes to come pay their respects.

tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 05:42 (seventeen years ago)

And his reason for buying a Rothko would have made the man open his veins a few years early.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 06:29 (seventeen years ago)

(well, not really. That assumes Rothko didn't know that his art had become an investment -- he did. That's the doubly grim joke in the scene, really. Cooper is exactly what Rothko hated most in his life.)

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 06:36 (seventeen years ago)

is bert really an elitist? based on his response when he found out about don's secret, he believes in meritocracy.

hmmmm, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 06:50 (seventeen years ago)

Only as far as Ayn Rand would.

Point is, Rand + bansai trees = a garbled philosophy that can only come from great, clueless privilege.

so glitchy (kenan), Tuesday, 30 September 2008 06:53 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i guess old-school elitist is a bit unfair; he's just an elitist, period. he doesn't think aristocratic breeding is required (although he respects its prerogatives).

tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 30 September 2008 07:06 (seventeen years ago)

"telstar"!!! :-)

drill, lazarus, drill!!! (get bent), Monday, 6 October 2008 05:59 (seventeen years ago)

yeah that was awesome. over a great closing shot. good episode overall. the side story with betty's dad was the kind of detour that i really like in this series, something sort of prosaic you don't see coming that fills out the characters.

tipsy mothra, Monday, 6 October 2008 06:05 (seventeen years ago)

I think this episode made clear what a horrible human being Paul is and how super fucking awesome Joan is cuz like her I love to watch that fucker squirm.

F*&@ OFF MATT KEMP! (Alex in SF), Monday, 6 October 2008 20:43 (seventeen years ago)

Great thing about the scene on the bus is the unbelieveable "oh shit is it going to be firebombed" element and then it just ends where it begins with Paul spouting nonsense.

F*&@ OFF MATT KEMP! (Alex in SF), Monday, 6 October 2008 20:46 (seventeen years ago)

Is it wrong of me to think this show might be better than the Sopranos?

F*&@ OFF MATT KEMP! (Alex in SF), Monday, 6 October 2008 21:27 (seventeen years ago)

haha that bus scene was priceless

Brosef Stalin (latebloomer), Monday, 6 October 2008 21:29 (seventeen years ago)

i think the show is more consistent that the Sopranos.

akm, Monday, 6 October 2008 21:31 (seventeen years ago)

Is it wrong of me to think this show might be better than the Sopranos?

i thought the writing on the sopranos was weaker. plus, by the time it started airing, i was pretty sick of "the mob" as a character in entertainment. (i grew up in nyc and heard those stereotypes all my life.)

drill, lazarus, drill!!! (get bent), Monday, 6 October 2008 21:41 (seventeen years ago)

i was glad to see glenn and his mom again. wondered what happened to them.

tipsy mothra, Monday, 6 October 2008 21:50 (seventeen years ago)

haha that bus scene was priceless

Incredible baloney. "The market, and I'm talking in a purely Marxist sense, dictates that we must include everyone." I think you may need to brush up on your Marx, there, brah.

Herb Hitts, Bad Vibe magazine (kenan), Monday, 6 October 2008 22:02 (seventeen years ago)

In a purely Marxist sense, the market depends on one social or economic group being exploited for the rest of it to live. Even in a non-Marxist sense, in 1962, black people were a shitty demographic. They didn't have any money. What the hell is he talking about?

Herb Hitts, Bad Vibe magazine (kenan), Monday, 6 October 2008 22:04 (seventeen years ago)

Nonsense, but what else would Paul talk about?!?!

F*&@ OFF MATT KEMP! (Alex in SF), Monday, 6 October 2008 22:07 (seventeen years ago)

The Twilight Zone. Which I like about him.

Herb Hitts, Bad Vibe magazine (kenan), Monday, 6 October 2008 22:13 (seventeen years ago)

Is it wrong of me to think this show might be better than the Sopranos?

― F*&@ OFF MATT KEMP! (Alex in SF), Monday, 6 October 2008 22:27 (54 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

The further the show goes on, the more Sopranos-y it becomes (Don as Tony, Pete as Ralfie).

Carrie Bradshaw Layfield (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Monday, 6 October 2008 22:23 (seventeen years ago)

I like Pete as Ralfie. True 'nuff. And Pete as ur-hipster, which has no Sopranos analog. Lots of characters don't. (But I tried to put Pete into Deadwood a few days ago, so I understand the temptation to draw parallels between one excellent show and another.)

Herb Hitts, Bad Vibe magazine (kenan), Monday, 6 October 2008 22:32 (seventeen years ago)

I assume you mean Paul as ur-hipster.

F*&@ OFF MATT KEMP! (Alex in SF), Monday, 6 October 2008 22:34 (seventeen years ago)

I think Pete is as Tony-esque as Don is actually.

F*&@ OFF MATT KEMP! (Alex in SF), Monday, 6 October 2008 22:34 (seventeen years ago)

Paul, yes, xpost, oops

Herb Hitts, Bad Vibe magazine (kenan), Monday, 6 October 2008 22:36 (seventeen years ago)

drunk pete trying to get sympathy from disdainful peggy was cute. i like when pete tries to act in some serious grown-up way and just seems like more of a spoiled kid. (like when he reprimands his wife: "do i have to put my foot down?!")

tipsy mothra, Monday, 6 October 2008 23:56 (seventeen years ago)

what does putting one's foot down entail?

Schwarzwalder Kirschtorte (get bent), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 00:15 (seventeen years ago)

alex dont be jealous cause joan and paul dated. thats all over now and it didnt mean a thing anyway. really.

joe six pak (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 00:33 (seventeen years ago)

what does putting one's foot down entail?

The kind of donnybrook you don't want to witness!

Herb Hitts, Bad Vibe magazine (kenan), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 00:45 (seventeen years ago)

so great

http://flickr.com/photos/nobodyssweetheart/2909385400/sizes/m/

Schwarzwalder Kirschtorte (get bent), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 04:38 (seventeen years ago)

HA! I love the way that even in the artist's rendering, you can tell he's talking a pile of shit.

Herb Hitts, Bad Vibe magazine (kenan), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 04:42 (seventeen years ago)

reminds me of this snapshot of a print on the wall of a chic little bar that has since burned down (Joy Blue, for Chicagoans):

http://tittysprinkles.net/images/ilx/scuse-me-while-i-whip-this-out.jpg

Herb Hitts, Bad Vibe magazine (kenan), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 05:17 (seventeen years ago)

very shag-like

Schwarzwalder Kirschtorte (get bent), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 05:18 (seventeen years ago)

Quite the idea. Before it burned down, it had a "reputation."

Herb Hitts, Bad Vibe magazine (kenan), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 05:19 (seventeen years ago)

(Disclaimer: that picture, taken one of the two times I was ever in there, 9:00 on a Tuesday night. Before someone says "How would you know about its reputation?".)

Herb Hitts, Bad Vibe magazine (kenan), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 05:26 (seventeen years ago)

so what's everyone's opinion of second season vs first? i'm only half way thru the second season so far but i'm finding it waaaay better

t_g, Tuesday, 7 October 2008 07:58 (seventeen years ago)

We're not much past you - episode 10 of season 2 was Sunday night. So I guess in a 12 or 13 episode season, that would put you three or four episodes behind? A night's work.

On s1 vs. s2, I'll quote myself from upthread: Season 1 is great, do not miss, but watching episodes again now, it feels almost like it's all setup. Season 2 has so far been *so* much heavier, denser, better.

crusty but benign (kenan), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 08:15 (seventeen years ago)

yeah that's kind of the feeling that i've got, i was thinking abt going back and watching season 1 again but it seems like the first half of that season was all 'ok we're in the 50s, things are different, do you get it?'. of course that's over simplifying + it was way more than that, but still.

t_g, Tuesday, 7 October 2008 08:25 (seventeen years ago)

Even the second half of s2 is better than the first half

crusty but benign (kenan), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 08:39 (seventeen years ago)

s1, I meant

crusty but benign (kenan), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 08:39 (seventeen years ago)

I mean, the fist half of s1 is *really* all setup, and then it gets into power struggles and heart attacks and death and the implications of Don's cavalier thing, and s2 continues down the hole in that direction.

crusty but benign (kenan), Tuesday, 7 October 2008 08:41 (seventeen years ago)

for real

t_g, Tuesday, 7 October 2008 08:52 (seventeen years ago)

gettin' freaky now.

the don-in-cali stuff i thought was good. the "i'm a homosexual" bit felt flat somehow. and poor peggy, her dates are all with priests and gay dudes.

tipsy mothra, Monday, 13 October 2008 05:34 (seventeen years ago)

the ending left me breathless.

Schwarzwalder Kirschtorte (get bent), Monday, 13 October 2008 07:28 (seventeen years ago)

and poor peggy, her dates are all with priests and gay dudes.

and pete campbell.

Schwarzwalder Kirschtorte (get bent), Monday, 13 October 2008 07:30 (seventeen years ago)

Wow they really amped up the plot quick this episode!

Alex in SF, Monday, 13 October 2008 22:33 (seventeen years ago)

The boho eurotrash characters were the first bum note the show has struck for me this season. They felt way too central casting.

But Sal's wordless anguish in the scene where Kurt came out = brilliant

sktsh, Monday, 13 October 2008 23:58 (seventeen years ago)

yeah the fact that Sal was there during that was lol + heartbreak

great episode

dmr, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 00:29 (seventeen years ago)

back on last week:

over a great closing shot.

"telstar" plus the sun slowly rising over don's face was genius

the glenn + betty stuff was just icky :/

dmr, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 00:30 (seventeen years ago)

the eurotrash felt so ethereal to me, like they were part of a hallucination or bad dream. something is definitely awry in the mind of don draper.

Schwarzwalder Kirschtorte (get bent), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 00:35 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, they felt v v incongruous to me (which, ok, I accept was the point with Don leaving his baggage behind, going out west and getting rid of 'Don' etc) - the tone really reminded me of the Kevin Finnerty episodes of the Sopranos.

And actually, xp mention of Glenn and Betty last week had an icky counterpart in this episode, with Viscount Willie Le Creuset De Beaumarche (or whatever) sitting on Joy's bed and looking quite keen to jump in.

Don's tearing out of the last page of Joy's faulkner also tore me up (spesh when he HAD A NOTEBOOK RIGHT THERE!). Was it telegraphing a "he's a sociopath" vibe that he couldn't give a fuck about anyone else, or am I misreading that?

(also, Joy = teh hawtt.)

sktsh, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 00:55 (seventeen years ago)

like they were part of a hallucination or bad dream

for real, I got a very David Lynch-y, Mulholland Drive California bad-dream vibe from everything at the villa

especially after Don collapsed and fainted I had my antenna up for any clues that it wasn't really happening and was all in his head possibly

dmr, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 01:16 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i was gonna say something about a cali fever dream. so the implausibility of it all didn't put me off, because it seems like the point is that it's this world totally unmoored and disconnected from don's experiences. which is its appeal. (well that plus the girl.) i had more problems with the coming-out scene, because that character seems like a cartoon too but in the more realist setting of sterling cooper it just seemed a little jarring.

scenes w/duck this episode were great. he's the underheralded storyline this season.

tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 01:23 (seventeen years ago)

V true about euro hipster writer dude as cartoonish - especially the "lol girlfriend we gots to give you a makeov-ur!" direction it went. Like, him being gay = he's an expert hairdresser seemed like a leap Harry or Ken should make, but maybe not the story itself.

sktsh, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 01:47 (seventeen years ago)

did u see peggys hair - not exactly an expert

who the fuck dick whitman call???

joseph sixpack (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 03:22 (seventeen years ago)

So I am assume person he called is person he sent the book to early in the season, no?

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 03:26 (seventeen years ago)

All I could think was that it might be the woman from the car dealership. Actually, I don't remember him sending a book.

I don't know anything about business-- Does anybody understand exactly what Duck's up to?

B'wana Beast, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 03:37 (seventeen years ago)

ducks trying to get his old firm to buy sterling cooper and get himself $$$ and a better position in the new company

did he say he wanted creative to answer to him - uh oh don v duck coming up

joseph sixpack (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 03:41 (seventeen years ago)

if he ever goes back! i thought maybe he was calling his bro?

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 03:49 (seventeen years ago)

Don's brother? He committed suicide.

B'wana Beast, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 04:01 (seventeen years ago)

Yes, Duck would become Don's boss. But is this kind of deal underhanded, or is it business as usual?

B'wana Beast, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 04:06 (seventeen years ago)

oohhh yeeaaa!

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 04:17 (seventeen years ago)

i think he was calling someone from his army days.

Schwarzwalder Kirschtorte (get bent), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 04:22 (seventeen years ago)

duck's deal is just bidness. i like that he only gets his mojo back when he starts drinking again.

tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 04:39 (seventeen years ago)

ha yah as soon as he downed that drink he was all hay ive got a great idea!

there is absolutely a personal aspect to ducks deal as he fells kinda shit on my sterling cooper

joseph sixpack (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 13:29 (seventeen years ago)

also stems off of sterling telling him he'd never make partner I think

dmr, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 13:38 (seventeen years ago)

oh yeah it's personal. but he's not doing anything unethical. he's possibly setting up a nice buyout for the partners. could screw don, but it's not clear don particularly cares at this point...

tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 14:15 (seventeen years ago)

he lied to sterling and cooper abt the genesis of the deal saying his old firm came to him - certainly unethical tho prob not a big deal

joseph sixpack (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 14:17 (seventeen years ago)

don will def snap out of his weird dream and come back to s/c fighting - i mean there wouldnt be a show otherwise right

joseph sixpack (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 14 October 2008 14:18 (seventeen years ago)

Not one called Mad Men, I would think.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 14:44 (seventeen years ago)

I feel like it might not happen this season. Could be the big cliffhanger.

Jouster, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 20:07 (seventeen years ago)

odds on who will be first "mad man" regular to drop acid in season 4:

don: 5 to 2
paul: 6 to 1
peggy: 8 to 1
betty: 12 to 1
pete: 25 to 1
joan: 40 to 1
bertram cooper: 60 to 1

tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 21:27 (seventeen years ago)

btw, in the current season, where are we in the calendar year? i've lost track. are we coming up on the missile crisis?

tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 21:30 (seventeen years ago)

(well marilyn died in august '62, so yeah, i guess we'd be getting close)

tipsy mothra, Tuesday, 14 October 2008 21:31 (seventeen years ago)

I can see Peggy dropping acid.

Hey, I'm a couple episodes late in asking this but... what was that rule that Roger's very charming prostitute told him hadn't changed?

B'wana Beast, Wednesday, 15 October 2008 02:00 (seventeen years ago)

no kissing?

Schwarzwalder Kirschtorte (get bent), Wednesday, 15 October 2008 02:19 (seventeen years ago)

Well, is that a rule? You can tell me! Say you heard it from someone else.

B'wana Beast, Wednesday, 15 October 2008 02:28 (seventeen years ago)

so Joan's fiance is a shit.

akm, Monday, 20 October 2008 14:50 (seventeen years ago)

also, did I miss something important, but what exactly is the history b/w Roger and the Cooper family? Bertram told Alice he "promised to take care of him"; was there some family connection I forgot about?

The Don stuff with the former Mrs. Draper was excellent, they seemed to have such a real and true friendship and bond. He isn't like that with anyone else.

akm, Monday, 20 October 2008 14:51 (seventeen years ago)

I remember Bert saying in one episode that he had known Roger since Roger was a little boy, so I think he is at least a friend of the Sterling family.

Nicole, Monday, 20 October 2008 14:53 (seventeen years ago)

peggy ftw in this episode. sort of poignant exchange there with joan, where joan kind of stops resenting her success and just accepts that peggy's moved above her.

the baptismal closing shot was ok but the gospel tune was lily-gilding. i like this anna character though. and the little scene with the hot-rodders was nice.

tipsy mothra, Monday, 20 October 2008 15:01 (seventeen years ago)

I don't think there's a family connection btw Bert and Roger but they're longtime friends & biz partners. also I think Bert said Alice had introduced Roger and Mona so Alice was pissed about Roger's divorce

the other eyebrow raiser was Alice's parting shot about Roger having more than one kid, did she just mean "the ones you'll have in the future with yr new 20-year-old wifey"?

dmr, Monday, 20 October 2008 15:12 (seventeen years ago)

god joan's going to marry that piece of shit isn't she. i don't know if i can watch this show it's too goddamn depressing.

horseshoe, Monday, 20 October 2008 15:29 (seventeen years ago)

no, Alice meant, you're marrying a child, you dirty old man.

horseshoe, Monday, 20 October 2008 15:29 (seventeen years ago)

i'm already fantasizing about joan taking dr. dickhead to the cleaners in a 1975 divorce. and then testifying to a pattern of spousal abuse 15 years later when he gets sued for sexual harassment.

tipsy mothra, Monday, 20 October 2008 15:34 (seventeen years ago)

i kind of want don to stay in cali as a west-coast spinoff. you can tell weiner likes all the narrative possibilities california gives him.

tipsy mothra, Monday, 20 October 2008 15:35 (seventeen years ago)

no, Alice meant, you're marrying a child, you dirty old man.

ah right. that makes sense

dmr, Monday, 20 October 2008 15:54 (seventeen years ago)

scene btw joan and the doctor in draper's office was hard to fucking watch, for sure

dmr, Monday, 20 October 2008 15:56 (seventeen years ago)

for sure, for sure.

i think it was bert and alice's mother who introduced roger and mona? in any case, i enjoyed meeting alice. are we to take it that her "companion" is more like her partner?

lauren, Monday, 20 October 2008 16:15 (seventeen years ago)

also liked (if that's the right word) betty's scenes with sally. the smoking thing was kind of hilarious, and then the "you're a big girl now. let me burden you with my adult problems" speech. and betty's rather vicious call to her old riding buddy reinforced for me how much she and joan are alike.

lauren, Monday, 20 October 2008 16:18 (seventeen years ago)

this episode was a motherfucker

the tension bewtween his california existence and everything back east leaves no doubt as to why don would want to never go home - but obv he cant out run himself

his life is suddenly full of possibilities - loved the hinted future job introducing hotrod culture to the world

888 (ice crӕm), Monday, 20 October 2008 18:16 (seventeen years ago)

betty is kind of a piece of work huh

"here's a gift for you honey"
"oh mommy! a pony!"
"oh btw me and daddy are fighting, he may never come back"

dmr, Monday, 20 October 2008 18:21 (seventeen years ago)

sad pull-back on bert all alone after they finalized the deal

dmr, Monday, 20 October 2008 18:22 (seventeen years ago)

Betty has always seemed really unsuited to parenting to me, unlike Don. it's too bad she's the one home with the kids all day

horseshoe, Monday, 20 October 2008 18:23 (seventeen years ago)

i enjoyed meeting alice. are we to take it that her "companion" is more like her partner?

That's what I thought.

Nicole, Monday, 20 October 2008 18:27 (seventeen years ago)

xpost In a way that I can't put my finger on, Betty seems colder than Don. (This of course despite the fact that Don is a cheating motherfucker who's afraid of seemingly everything.)

crusty but benign (kenan), Monday, 20 October 2008 18:27 (seventeen years ago)

love all the little details that fill in the power relationships and heirarchy

like Alice to Bert -- "lol, take my shoes off? bitch please"

dmr, Monday, 20 October 2008 18:28 (seventeen years ago)

ha totally that was awesome

888 (ice crӕm), Monday, 20 October 2008 18:29 (seventeen years ago)

"I don't ask much..."

crusty but benign (kenan), Monday, 20 October 2008 18:35 (seventeen years ago)

her stockings cost more than his carpet!

horseshoe, Monday, 20 October 2008 18:36 (seventeen years ago)

that whole scene was set-up last week when duck asked roger for a raise and roger is breaking down how none of the partners support him and sd that alice, y'know, she just votes however bert tells her.

******* (Lamp), Monday, 20 October 2008 18:58 (seventeen years ago)

Betty has always seemed really unsuited to parenting to me, unlike Don.

yeah, that scene in which she lectures helen the divorcee about parental responsibilities was really all about herself. the kids are with carla or neighbors most of the time and are subject to betty's erratic, hot and cold style of mothering. that said, i don't think that don is particularly suited to parenting, either. he has an immense tenderness towards kids, based on his own damaged childhood, but that's not the same thing as being a good father.

lauren, Monday, 20 October 2008 19:11 (seventeen years ago)

Yes, if Don was really such a great parent I think he'd be less willing to completely abandon his children. He was ready to if Rachel had wanted to run away with him, and he may be ready to right now.

Nicole, Monday, 20 October 2008 19:13 (seventeen years ago)

i guess it's hard to imagine don being good at any relationships, but maybe some version of him that confronts who he is? i guess you're right. i just find his scenes with his kids moving.

xpost yeah, that is true, too.

horseshoe, Monday, 20 October 2008 19:14 (seventeen years ago)

otm... don's warm when he's THERE, but.

crusty but benign (kenan), Monday, 20 October 2008 19:15 (seventeen years ago)

i agree - there are some great moments involving don and the kids. and there's also the ep last season in which, after drinking all day, he disappears and thus sticks sally with that pathetic sarah lee cake for her birthday.

lauren, Monday, 20 October 2008 19:16 (seventeen years ago)

(and then shows up late at night with polly - "here. i ruined your party. have a dog")

lauren, Monday, 20 October 2008 19:16 (seventeen years ago)

yeah he sucked for that.

horseshoe, Monday, 20 October 2008 19:17 (seventeen years ago)

We haven't seen the dog since, have we?

crusty but benign (kenan), Monday, 20 October 2008 19:25 (seventeen years ago)

she's around but appears really sporadically. every now and again she'll be running in the yard or something.

lauren, Monday, 20 October 2008 19:26 (seventeen years ago)

(am waiting for betty to tell the kids polly had to go to a "farm," though.)

lauren, Monday, 20 October 2008 19:27 (seventeen years ago)

...in the sky

crusty but benign (kenan), Monday, 20 October 2008 19:28 (seventeen years ago)

Polly is a crucial character, guys.

Jouster, Monday, 20 October 2008 21:51 (seventeen years ago)

what was the little rhyme Roger said when he saw alice? It ended with "christopher robin went down with alice", and then he said, "best babysitter in the world" or something.

akm, Monday, 20 October 2008 23:12 (seventeen years ago)

Polly was in the great pigeon shooting episode!

Alex in SF, Monday, 20 October 2008 23:13 (seventeen years ago)

oh okay, it was just from When We Were Very Young. Which shows you that I never actually read any of those when I was a kid.

akm, Monday, 20 October 2008 23:15 (seventeen years ago)

Buckingham Palace
by A. A. Milne

They're changing guard at Buckingham Palace -
Christopher Robin went down with Alice.
Alice is marrying one of the guard.
"A soldier's life is terrible hard,"
Says Alice.

They're changing guard at Buckingham Palace -
Christopher Robin went down with Alice.
We saw a guard in a sentry-box.
"One of the sergeants looks after their socks,"
Says Alice.

They're changing guard at Buckingham Palace -
Christopher Robin went down with Alice.
We looked for the King, but he never came.
"Well, God take care of him, all the same,"
Says Alice.

They're changing guard at Buckingham Palace -
Christopher Robin went down with Alice.
They've great big parties inside the grounds.
"I wouldn't be King for a hundred pounds,"
Says Alice.

They're changing guard at Buckingham Palace -
Christopher Robin went down with Alice.
A face looked out, but it wasn't the King's.
"He's much too busy a-signing things,"
Says Alice.

They're changing guard at Buckingham Palace -
Christopher Robin went down with Alice.
"Do you think the King knows all about me?"
"Sure to, dear, but it's time for tea,"
Says Alice.

sometimes I pretend I am very huge and icy (kenan), Monday, 20 October 2008 23:17 (seventeen years ago)

i'm already fantasizing about joan taking dr. dickhead to the cleaners in a 1975 divorce. and then testifying to a pattern of spousal abuse 15 years later when he gets sued for sexual harassment.

this

i'm actually not certain now that joan's going to marry the fella. she may not be a bra-burning feminist, but she's not docile either...

santa fe springs eternal (get bent), Tuesday, 21 October 2008 00:30 (seventeen years ago)

I'm willing to bet I Sure Do Hate Those Frat Boys Doctor will be killed in early series three, or other the series off-period jump.

Carrie Bradshaw Layfield (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Tuesday, 21 October 2008 00:32 (seventeen years ago)

what was joan looking at off in the distance during the 4@p3 scene in don's office?

santa fe springs eternal (get bent), Tuesday, 21 October 2008 00:46 (seventeen years ago)

I got the impression it was just resignation and trying to focus on anything else, so I don't think there was any significance to to what she was looking at, which made the whole thing more unbearable for me.

Gukbe, Tuesday, 21 October 2008 01:26 (seventeen years ago)

Just watched the last two episodes.

for real, I got a very David Lynch-y, Mulholland Drive California bad-dream vibe from everything at the villa

^^^This was awesome. Adding to that was the fact that the woman who played Joy vaguely looked like -- but even more sounded like -- January Jones. For a while I thought it might actually have been her in a brunette wig.

jaymc, Tuesday, 21 October 2008 03:11 (seventeen years ago)

otm! that was another one of the things that made me think it was a dream sequence, she totally had Betty's voice and inflections.

dmr, Tuesday, 21 October 2008 03:24 (seventeen years ago)

there was also that blonde that he saw at the bar that was pretty obviously january jones until he looked at her full on, and it switched to another actress

akm, Tuesday, 21 October 2008 04:55 (seventeen years ago)

this episode was insane. joan. :(

Disco/Very (Roz), Tuesday, 21 October 2008 15:13 (seventeen years ago)

Rituals, baptism, the madonna image in the popsicle ad, mothers and children... and "Hell's bells!"

Disco/Very (Roz), Tuesday, 21 October 2008 15:15 (seventeen years ago)

looking forward to jon hamm hosting snl

johnny crunch, Tuesday, 21 October 2008 15:40 (seventeen years ago)

bringing the hamm.

Disco/Very (Roz), Tuesday, 21 October 2008 15:54 (seventeen years ago)

lol @ peggy not telling the clients abt subliminal madonna

888 (ice crӕm), Tuesday, 21 October 2008 15:58 (seventeen years ago)

lol @ peggy not telling the clients abt subliminal madonna

hahaha shit I knew I was missing something when the client said "she reminds me of someone..."

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 21 October 2008 16:02 (seventeen years ago)

(lolz I am Jewish)

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 21 October 2008 16:02 (seventeen years ago)

also lol'd @ "I'm sleeping with Don." yay peggy.

Disco/Very (Roz), Tuesday, 21 October 2008 16:14 (seventeen years ago)

yeah that i'm sleeping w/ don thing was gold from peggy.

also what was the deal w/ betty bleeding?

t_g, Thursday, 23 October 2008 11:34 (seventeen years ago)

Ordinary menses, maybe exacerbated by stress, probably exaggerated by riding pants.

Full of high sentence, but a bit obtuse (kenan), Thursday, 23 October 2008 11:37 (seventeen years ago)

Probably also highlighting the point that for all the shit that poor little girl has to deal with emotionally at the moment, periods are still an unknown unknown for her.

Full of high sentence, but a bit obtuse (kenan), Thursday, 23 October 2008 11:39 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i was wondering what the significance of it would be, thought it might be something more serious

t_g, Thursday, 23 October 2008 11:44 (seventeen years ago)

I wondered if it was some pregnancy thing

dmr, Thursday, 23 October 2008 13:10 (seventeen years ago)

That's what I thinking it was.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 23 October 2008 13:38 (seventeen years ago)

Also, guys, Betty's bleeding, but she doesn't know it yet.

Sir, are you calling 911 to complain about traffic? (G00blar), Sunday, 26 October 2008 09:28 (seventeen years ago)

I love this show so much, I want to take it behind the middle school and get it pregnant. Season finale already tonight (in the states)!

The Don stuff with the former Mrs. Draper was excellent, they seemed to have such a real and true friendship and bond. He isn't like that with anyone else.

Yeah, Don was smiling almost the entire time in these scenes. He almost never smiles.

lol @ peggy not telling the clients abt subliminal madonna

It was also subliminal Peggy! After she puts down the artwork, the camera lingers on her--with the same style dress and haircut--for like three seconds.

Sir, are you calling 911 to complain about traffic? (G00blar), Sunday, 26 October 2008 09:37 (seventeen years ago)

I'm kind of scared of my post-election, post-Mad Men Season 2 world. What the fuck am I going to do with myself?

READ?

en i see kay, Sunday, 26 October 2008 09:51 (seventeen years ago)

30 ROCK

Sir, are you calling 911 to complain about traffic? (G00blar), Sunday, 26 October 2008 09:55 (seventeen years ago)

excellent and understated finale. I felt really bad for Pete here; I've always kind of liked him despite his being a completely pathetic figure, but this time my sympathy crossed over to empathy. I really was not expecting him to be so honestly in love.

Don Draper's Guide to Picking Up Women on SNL the night before was classic, btw.

akm, Monday, 27 October 2008 13:34 (seventeen years ago)

I haven't seen the finale yet but here's a really great interview with Matthew Weiner: http://weblogs.variety.com/season_pass/2008/10/mad-men-qa.html

Disco/Very (Roz), Monday, 27 October 2008 13:49 (seventeen years ago)

I am not reading anything here yet but I am sad to report that for some reason my channel in Toronto ("A Channel") didn't air Mad Men last night, instead the aired The 40 Year Old Virgin. Very uncool. The Simpsons episode lampooning Mad Men also didn't air last night like I thought it was going to - I thought it was a Hallowe'en episode - so last night was kind of a bummer. Plus side, I got a lot of cleaning done.

skeletal lexing (Finefinemusic), Monday, 27 October 2008 14:37 (seventeen years ago)

i think that simpsons episode was on last week

akm, Monday, 27 October 2008 14:45 (seventeen years ago)

bah damnit

skeletal lexing (Finefinemusic), Monday, 27 October 2008 14:45 (seventeen years ago)

no, good stuff: The show opens with Homer Simpson attempting to vote for Barack Obama — convenient as the episode airs on November 2, two nights before election day — and goes on to parody the Transformers franchise. But by far the HIPPEST thing about the new THOH episode? Simpsonizing the addictive Mad Men opening credits..... Some screencaps @ BWE

skeletal lexing (Finefinemusic), Monday, 27 October 2008 15:03 (seventeen years ago)

that interview's so good, esp interesting to hear him talk abt richard yates

t_g, Monday, 27 October 2008 15:07 (seventeen years ago)

felt really bad for Pete here; ... I really was not expecting him to be so honestly in love.

yeah, that was sort of one of those surprises that actually made perfect sense -- it's been signaled in little ways all year, and it fills out his character to think that he's been sitting there building up a big fantasy of peggy in his head. of course how much he's "really" in love is hard to say, peggy more than anything represents a world outside the world he's trapped in. that scene with the two of them was my favorite one in the episode, perfectly written and played. the gulf between them in their knowledge and experience of the world and how they see themselves within it. peggy understands that pete sees her as some kind of escape, but she's moved on so far beyond him.

tipsy mothra, Monday, 27 October 2008 15:29 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i don't think that scene was about pete being really in love, though i'm biased because i HATE him. i think it parallels Don asking Rachel to run away with him last year: he's stuck in a marriage and a life that's not working for him + he's projecting relief from all that onto Peggy.

horseshoe, Monday, 27 October 2008 15:44 (seventeen years ago)

and it was incredibly satisfying to hear Peggy say those things to him.

horseshoe, Monday, 27 October 2008 15:44 (seventeen years ago)

http://video.aol.com/partner/player/hulu/239394928

imperial management trainee (latebloomer), Monday, 27 October 2008 16:46 (seventeen years ago)

actually this is better

http://video.aol.com/partner/hulu/saturday-night-live-don-drapers-guide/XADA0CZBSxhobkNIMA21K6X4GhhqEt9h/?icid=VIDURVCOM08

imperial management trainee (latebloomer), Monday, 27 October 2008 16:49 (seventeen years ago)

interesting pete siding w/don slipping him the inside info before the meet - he felt better abt having dons trust than ducks position - and lol @ i dont have a contract

888 (ice crӕm), Monday, 27 October 2008 16:58 (seventeen years ago)

"duck never could hold his liquor"

Eurasian Traveler Wig and Moustache Set (get bent), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 02:29 (seventeen years ago)

interesting pete siding w/don slipping him the inside info before the meet - he felt better abt having dons trust than ducks position - and lol @ i dont have a contract

i thought it was great that as much as Pete hates Don, he hates the idea of Don being under Duck even more.

That scene between Pete and Peggy was amazing, so quiet and intense.

Disco/Very (Roz), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 06:32 (seventeen years ago)

pete has a continual need to try to get in with don, no matter how don treats him, which seems like it comes from his family situation. all his life he's been attempting to ingratiate himself with people who don't like him and have no use for him, but he has to keep banging his head against the wall. the closest i came to feeling bad for pete this ep. was when don sold him that "i left you to see if you could prove yourself, and you did" line. the way he puffed up was almost touching.

lauren, Tuesday, 28 October 2008 15:43 (seventeen years ago)

also - pete is still slimy pete, and i think that at this point he knows that if you're going to bet on someone, it should be don.

and lol @ i dont have a contract

omg, yes. i was waiting for that from the moment duck brought up non-compete clauses.

lauren, Tuesday, 28 October 2008 15:49 (seventeen years ago)

i loved don's answers to pete re: telling him about the merger and duck...so neutral and efficient. how do you know this? why are you telling me? and finally thanking him. i dont think don's contempt for him really sinks in w/ pete but they both really deserve each other, in a way

johnny crunch, Tuesday, 28 October 2008 15:53 (seventeen years ago)

xpost yeah me too.

Pete's just a child at the end of the day (something that's totally clear when he's just blindsided by the very adult reality revealed to him by Peggy). He's always seen Don as a sort of father, and he's the sort of ambitious son that's never sure if he wants to kill his father or worship him or earn his love or some mixture.

Sir, are you calling 911 to complain about traffic? (G00blar), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 15:54 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, it's very childish the way he just presents himself to peggy when it's clear his marriage is over. like he assumes trudy was the only thing standing in their way and now peggy's going to jump into his arms all grateful-like.

Eurasian Traveler Wig and Moustache Set (get bent), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 15:59 (seventeen years ago)

Not to mention he treated Peggy like crap before he realized he was trapped in a terrible marriage.

Disco/Very (Roz), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 16:00 (seventeen years ago)

men are so strange.

Eurasian Traveler Wig and Moustache Set (get bent), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 16:01 (seventeen years ago)

btw I think Pete and Duck have swapped places on Jhoshea's Mad Men Jerkladder©.

Sir, are you calling 911 to complain about traffic? (G00blar), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 16:03 (seventeen years ago)

it was really childish of him. and i don't think that he really meant it, beyond being drunk and thinking that nuclear holocaust was imminent.

lauren, Tuesday, 28 October 2008 16:07 (seventeen years ago)

I liked Don's little look of pride when he saw Peggy had scored her own office. it's funny how Pete constantly needs Don's approval, but if there's anyone among the junior execs that Don's clearly a mentor to, it's her.

Disco/Very (Roz), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 16:11 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, well they've got a lot of similarities, don't they. Both have secrets that they keep in the service of self-making.

Sir, are you calling 911 to complain about traffic? (G00blar), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 16:13 (seventeen years ago)

i said upthread somewhere that Don and Peggy recognize each other as kindred spirits on some level. I think their scenes together have been some of the best ones this season.

also i just rewatched a couple of episodes from earlier and it's so great to see how much foreshadowing there's been e.g. Betty telling Don she keeps dreaming about a suitcase, a couple of episodes before the surreal california retreat one which ends with Don's suitcase arriving at home without him. Or single mom neighbour telling Betty that life without her husband was no different than life with, and then Betty telling Don the same thing almost word for word in this one.

Disco/Very (Roz), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 16:18 (seventeen years ago)

Oh yeah!

Sir, are you calling 911 to complain about traffic? (G00blar), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 16:22 (seventeen years ago)

Long interview with Matthew Weiner (this is a pretty good blog for episode analysis, too).

jaymc, Tuesday, 28 October 2008 16:58 (seventeen years ago)

^^^interview is all about Season 2, including the finale

jaymc, Tuesday, 28 October 2008 16:59 (seventeen years ago)

I just had one of those "MY BLOOD IS BOILING!" moments when I was reading comments on another blog about how it should have been so easy for Betty to get an abortion if she'd really wanted one. Yeah, sure.

"John Kerry dissed me, I'm trippin!" (Nicole), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 17:10 (seventeen years ago)

I think my favorite part of the season closer was the Don's expression/tiniest of head movements when he's told that he'll clear a half-million in the buy out.

Chris Barrus (Elvis Telecom), Tuesday, 28 October 2008 18:55 (seventeen years ago)

when don sold him that "i left you to see if you could prove yourself, and you did" line

I don't think Don "sold" Pete any lines - I thought he did think Pete could handle it, and apparently that's what happened. Don wasn't lying there, despite any distaste for Pete he has (imo).

Jouster, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 01:01 (seventeen years ago)

i don't think pete really crossed don's mind at all on the california trip. that was just a way of (emotionally) bribing pete into dropping the subject.

Eurasian Traveler Wig and Moustache Set (get bent), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 01:05 (seventeen years ago)

loved that don noticed peggy's hair right away

hytop, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 05:21 (seventeen years ago)

i don't think pete really crossed don's mind at all on the california trip. that was just a way of (emotionally) bribing pete into dropping the subject.

i think that's partly true but in those interviews posted, matthew weiner said that we're supposed to see it as Don genuinely thinking that Pete had earned the praise, just by judging by the amount of research he put in on the trip, by actually doing his job and not just wanting to tear Don down.

Disco/Very (Roz), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 05:31 (seventeen years ago)

i was obv not paying enough attention during peggy's speech bcz i hadnt realised that the baby in the family wasnt hers

t_g, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 09:15 (seventeen years ago)

I really thought that baby was hers too! Maybe it is and she was lying to Pete

Dan I., Wednesday, 29 October 2008 09:18 (seventeen years ago)

I thought it was and that she was telling Pete a half-truth in that she "gave it away.

This is need to know info for my personal JerkLadder.

en i see kay, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 09:21 (seventeen years ago)

in that interview that jaymc links just up there, matthew weiner says that it's her sister's.

t_g, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 09:22 (seventeen years ago)

yeah when she said she gave it away i thought it was a half-truth also! and also, that 'giving it away' could easily mean giving it to her sister to look after.

t_g, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 09:23 (seventeen years ago)

yeah me too

Sir, are you calling 911 to complain about traffic? (G00blar), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 09:23 (seventeen years ago)

"I thought it was and that she was telling Pete a half-truth in that she "gave it away."

It isn't. It's the full-truth. It's her sister's baby and the earlier clue is that her sister was pregnant when Peggy was in the hospital and there is no other comparably aged infant around in the sister's house. This show really really rewards paying attention carefully (note to self: pay more attention.)

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 12:32 (seventeen years ago)

I've been puzzled by all the "Don Draper" refs everywhere the last month until I realized it's the protagonist on this fucking thing.

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 13:20 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, stupid shows made in the last half century.

"John Kerry dissed me, I'm trippin!" (Nicole), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 13:21 (seventeen years ago)

no, just fuck the dicks in advertising and dull 'period' TV shows about them

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 13:26 (seventeen years ago)

Not everything can be Munich.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 13:53 (seventeen years ago)

yes let's pretend advertising never existed!

akm, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 13:57 (seventeen years ago)

if wishes were fishes...

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 14:02 (seventeen years ago)

i don't think pete really crossed don's mind at all on the california trip. that was just a way of (emotionally) bribing pete into dropping the subject.

yeah, i really don't think that at the time, don had any thought for pete or what he could/couldn't do if left to his own devices with the aerospace industry. after the fact maybe he was impressed, but he also had to know what effect that little speech would have on someone as hungry for his approval as pete is. he completely shut down the situation.

lauren, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 14:09 (seventeen years ago)

this season has been excellent

real slow and rich

coznebb (cozwn), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 14:34 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.deadlinehollywooddaily.com/lionsgate-must-be-staffed-by-mad-men/

It takes a lot to shock me when it comes to Hollywood business. But this is lunacy. Lionsgate execs are calling Hollywood agencies looking for a showrunner to replace Matthew Weiner, the brilliant creator of Mad Men. The reason is that they think Weiner's agents at CAA are asking for too much money for him. I hear CAA wants a multi-year deal that pays Weiner $10 million a year. Plus he wants control over promotion and advertising. Now that's consistent with a big hit on pay cable and what Darren Star or David Chase made on HBO. But it's way, way rich for a Lionsgate show on AMC, and execs are telling CAA it can't pay that. "The 'ask' was insanity," one insider tells me. "It's preposterous. AMC is a basic cable network. The economics don't support this. It's why Lionsgate is throwing their arms up in the air. And, remember, they got a two-year pickup for the show with or without Matt Weiner." So Lionsgate picked up the phone and began asking the tenpercenteries for a "general list" of possible showrunners, and about the availability of specific names (like Aaron Sorkin).

Gukbe, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 14:41 (seventeen years ago)

For fuck's sake.

Carrie Bradshaw Layfield (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 14:43 (seventeen years ago)

yeah, get aaron sorkin in to do this; that'll work

fuck it, get david milch

coznebb (cozwn), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 14:45 (seventeen years ago)

This show really really rewards paying attention carefully (note to self: pay more attention.)

more like note to show, if you engage in that much intentional misdirection you can't make the reveal so subtle that 99% of viewers miss it

(or am I wrong? did other people catch that? like most people I thought she meant "I gave away the baby" but left out "to my sister" because she didn't want Pete to see the kid)

dmr, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 15:02 (seventeen years ago)

But a HUGE % of the shows reveals are subtle and/or contentious! That's what makes the show great!

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 15:10 (seventeen years ago)

http://videogum.com/archives/parodies/breaking-video-the-simpsons-s_031281.html

Michael White, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 15:28 (seventeen years ago)

i said upthread somewhere that Don and Peggy recognize each other as kindred spirits on some level. I think their scenes together have been some of the best ones this season.

― Disco/Very (Roz), Tuesday, October 28, 2008 12:18 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yah totally - ive noticed that peggy has really adopted dons contemplative brainstorming approach - ie when shes mumbling to herself abt religion and loving popsicles then out comes the mom as virgin mary ad

i keep thinking abt when don rebukes peggy for her glib sex sell comment telling her sex doesnt sell when you feel something thats what sells

888 (ice crӕm), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:12 (seventeen years ago)

and i agree the show was trying way to hard to make us think that was peggys baby if in fact it isnt

888 (ice crӕm), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:14 (seventeen years ago)

That "Don't you want to look at him scene?" in particular. I was sure she was looking at her own son then. If it was her nephew, the whole episode changes its meaning.

There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:20 (seventeen years ago)

aaron sorkin will RUIN this series

akm, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:22 (seventeen years ago)

and the shots of her sitting in the church pew with the kid

you throw all that out there and then in that interview upthread Weiner is like "gosh I don't know why people thought that was peggy's kid, they must have wanted to believe that for some reason"

ok dude

xpost

dmr, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:23 (seventeen years ago)

http://defamer.com/5070166/

A rumor that Lionsgate is approaching various agencies in search of a Mad Men showrunner to replace a too-rich-for-their-blood Matthew Weiner was shot down by an insider, who told Defamer the negotiations had just begun, and that while he asked high, they were absolutely "not looking to replace him. He IS the show." Fret not, Mad Men fans still in mourning over the end of Season 2 and sweating the fate of Season 3: the studio is confident the deal will close before Christmas. (And without the celebrity dancing competition Jon Hamm promised in his SNL monologue.)

imperial management trainee (latebloomer), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:25 (seventeen years ago)

aaron sorkin will RUIN this series

He ruins any series.

"John Kerry dissed me, I'm trippin!" (Nicole), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:26 (seventeen years ago)

Just to clear something up: Betty got pregnant from the night she and Don spent at her dad and stepmom's house, right?

jaymc, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:27 (seventeen years ago)

But the show never explicitly states that and if fact they not-to-subtly hint that if fact he's not (again the flashback sequence where the sister is clearly pregnant which everyone is choosing to ignore.) We all made the same assumption the asshole Priest did!

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:27 (seventeen years ago)

xpost Yes.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:27 (seventeen years ago)

There is no way in hell anyone other than Weiner is doing this series.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:28 (seventeen years ago)

Just to clear something up: Betty got pregnant from the night she and Don spent at her dad and stepmom's house, right?

― jaymc, Wednesday, October 29, 2008 12:27 PM (21 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i couldnt tell if that scene was a dream or what

888 (ice crӕm), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:28 (seventeen years ago)

I thought it was at first but ultimately decided it wasn't.

jaymc, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:29 (seventeen years ago)

morbs - i am one of those "dicks in advertising"

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:29 (seventeen years ago)

season ending on a faux cliffhanger is pretty ingenious - we all know how the cuban missile crisis plays out and obv don beats duck - yet it still feels suspenseful

wouldnt be surprised if the next season was another couple years down the line never bothering to explicitly explain how the merger played out

did anyone else think don looked different when he returned from california - more vulnerable, older

888 (ice crӕm), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:34 (seventeen years ago)

tanned

Sir, are you calling 911 to complain about traffic? (G00blar), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:37 (seventeen years ago)

couldve just been the tan

888 (ice crӕm), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:38 (seventeen years ago)

i couldnt tell if that scene was a dream or what

nah that was real, they kinda talked about it later (when betty told don "we were just pretending")

dmr, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:40 (seventeen years ago)

That "Don't you want to look at him scene?" in particular. I was sure she was looking at her own son then.

i think she was? and she didn't want to look at him, and she gave him up for adoption.

lauren, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:40 (seventeen years ago)

Well, there was the whole "Take it away - I don't even want to look at it" thing from the first season finale.

xxxxppppoooosssttt

There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:40 (seventeen years ago)

(if you mean the scene in the hospital.)

xposts!

lauren, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:41 (seventeen years ago)

^^uh-oh

To change the topic, did anyoen else agree with the interpretation from one of the post-mortems I read (Salon?) that the look on Don's face when Betty tells him she's pregant showed horror that he's they're tied together by the need to take care of the kids (and thus not by the romantic ideals evinced in his letter to her)?

I may be reading into it too much, but I definitely saw some understanding and empathy on his face, like maybe he's finally starting to understand what it must be like to be Don Draper's wife (and what it must've been like for Betty to find out she was pregnant by a husband who betrayed her).

Sir, are you calling 911 to complain about traffic? (G00blar), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:41 (seventeen years ago)

To clarify - the "Don't you want to look at him?" scene I was referring to earlier was the one in Peggy's sister's apartment in episode 2 or so of this season.

There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:42 (seventeen years ago)

ohhh, ok.

lauren, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:43 (seventeen years ago)

yeah in the hospital it was her kid

scenes like "aren't you even going to say goodnight to him?" were the sister's kid

I guess in retrospect it was the sister laying on a guilt trip, and peggy being nervous around the sister's kid because of her own actions

but other scenes strongly hinted that the mom and sister did not let peggy give the kid away (the state said she wasn't competent to make her own decisions? something like that)

dmr, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:44 (seventeen years ago)

G00blar, I totally agree with the Salon interpretation. I'll also agree with your interpretation as well.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:45 (seventeen years ago)

I gotta look at the sister's confessional scene again, too.

There is no Grodd but Mallah and Congorilla is His Prophet. (Oilyrags), Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:45 (seventeen years ago)

(it makes sense, though, that she's uncomfortable around babies given her situation.)

xpost

re: the state thing, i think in retrospect it was that they kept her for observation, not that they forced her to keep the baby.

lauren, Wednesday, 29 October 2008 16:45 (seventeen years ago)

I'm hooked on this show now u_u

Every Day Jimmy Mod Is Hustlin' (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Sunday, 2 November 2008 02:52 (seventeen years ago)

damn this show is so good

max, Sunday, 2 November 2008 05:00 (seventeen years ago)

finally finished this season

max, Sunday, 2 November 2008 05:00 (seventeen years ago)

me too! just watched both in about a month!

;n_n; (tehresa), Saturday, 8 November 2008 05:14 (seventeen years ago)

so re: cooper taking care of roger upthread, i vaguely remember there being mention of the fact that the original 'sterling' in sterling cooper was rog's dad, which makes sense if you think about it - he'd be more on par with cooper as a founding partner.

;n_n; (tehresa), Saturday, 8 November 2008 05:15 (seventeen years ago)

also totally psyched i can finally read this thread!

;n_n; (tehresa), Saturday, 8 November 2008 05:18 (seventeen years ago)

two weeks pass...

only watched 2 episodes but these characters all seem so unlikeable, like they're not actually characters just caricatures of the attitudes of the time. does this change??

deej, Friday, 28 November 2008 08:25 (seventeen years ago)

xtina hendricks is obv real hot and i think the show looks really good visually but beyond that its like ugh -- and heavy-handed too -- my mom found it to be an ott version of 60s office culture

deej, Friday, 28 November 2008 08:26 (seventeen years ago)

reading a bit more of the thread it seems like it gets better as it goes on -- dont want to read any spoilers tho so can anyone tell me if the shit i said above continues as the show goes on??

deej, Friday, 28 November 2008 08:29 (seventeen years ago)

It does get a lot better. By the 4th or 5th episode of the first season, Don's character is better established and the supporting characters begin to come into their own, so that new plotlines stem off more organically rather than the writers throwing more 'lol sixties' stuff into the show and basing episodes around that.

You still get throwaway 60s references well into the second season, but thankfully the show hasn't yet developed Gump syndrome, where the characters manage to experience every significant cultural phenomenon of the decade. What little is there, even if it's occasionally heavy-handed, is part of the appeal. A lot of nice to have just as respite from the heavy shit that starts going down plotwise.

Also, Pete Campbell.

Millsner, Friday, 28 November 2008 08:55 (seventeen years ago)

Last bit should read "A lot of it is nice to have..."

Millsner, Friday, 28 November 2008 08:56 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i agree, second half of the first season is way better. and then the second season is even better still. and that shit you were talking abt doesnt really continue as the show goes on, i cant think of any of those lol 60s things happening in the second season, but i might be wrong.

t_g, Friday, 28 November 2008 09:19 (seventeen years ago)

I can think of a couple, but they're always used to provide more insight into the characters rather than as throwaway gags. Hard to say much else without spoilers.

Millsner, Friday, 28 November 2008 09:24 (seventeen years ago)

just started watching it too. saw third episode last night. people complaining about lol 60s sure are hard to please.

the next grozart, Friday, 28 November 2008 09:53 (seventeen years ago)

the lol60's stuff is really a minor quibble, but I can see how someone can get put off. I rewatched the first episode some months back with a friend. I tried to convince him it was really good, but when Sal came in with the lolhestehgay stuff, my friend rolled his eyes in disgust. I tried to convince him it gets much better, but he would have none of it.

Gukbe, Friday, 28 November 2008 10:12 (seventeen years ago)

One of the N+1 dudes wrote an incredibly misguided LRB piece on the perception that the show was all lol60s:

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v30/n20/grei01_.html

Stevie T, Friday, 28 November 2008 10:21 (seventeen years ago)

yeah i read that. misguided is definitely the word

t_g, Friday, 28 November 2008 10:22 (seventeen years ago)

its obv the show is amazing from the 1st ep - then it just gets better - lol 60s complaints are purely fools desperately searching for a critical angle

ice cr?m, Friday, 28 November 2008 14:27 (seventeen years ago)

"misguided" is too weak a word; I don't get angry about crit anymore but that one just made me furious

does he have a whole team of ppl helping him not get it? (n+lol)

czn (cozwn), Friday, 28 November 2008 14:42 (seventeen years ago)

well the lol60s stuff is real enough, but i guess the big difference is whether you think its real point is "look at how we were" or "look at how we are." i think it's the second one, and that makes it a whole different show than the one he's talking about.

tipsy mothra, Friday, 28 November 2008 15:49 (seventeen years ago)

yep and it's a bit hard not to get all lol60s when the show is primarily about the 60s! especially in the beginning. it does get better - i think the show starts off as being about the trappings of the era, and then slowly transforms to being about the characters' attempts to escape the trappings.

Disco/Very (Roz), Friday, 28 November 2008 16:15 (seventeen years ago)

... slowly transforms to being about the characters' attempts to escape the trappings.

OTFM, especially the women.

Millsner, Friday, 28 November 2008 17:22 (seventeen years ago)

On the flipside, you've also got characters who revel in the era's waning status quo but are kind of destroyed by it.

Millsner, Friday, 28 November 2008 17:26 (seventeen years ago)

yep definitely. i would also add that the people who are trying to break out of it don't really succeed either (with possible exception of peggy). I think the show really got so much better in the second season because it was all about showing how those shifts affect each character differently, and how this plays out in their responses to events in their personal lives.

Disco/Very (Roz), Friday, 28 November 2008 17:36 (seventeen years ago)

Also just started this show on DVD. Holy shit is it bleak. But, good. I don't want to say enjoyable, cuz there are a lot of fucked up and sad things going on in the show. worst bit for me was seeing a little kid get slapped by an adult (not his parent) for spilling a drink at a party. damn. not to mention all the obvious gender stuff.

ian, Friday, 28 November 2008 17:53 (seventeen years ago)

i think the show starts off as being about the trappings of the era, and then slowly transforms to being about the characters' attempts to escape the trappings.

yeah, it's called setting the scene. it would be weird to just jump into WOAHDRAMA when you don't even know who these people are or what kind of world they're living in.

jordans-menendi (tehresa), Friday, 28 November 2008 19:15 (seventeen years ago)

like, how can we admire peggy's fight if we don't know what she's fighting?
i mean, obv we know on some level, but i think the heavy handedness is effective in this case.

jordans-menendi (tehresa), Friday, 28 November 2008 19:16 (seventeen years ago)

Some of the lol60's don't-they-drink-a-lot etc... stuff actually led to one of the best scenes in the first series, where Sterling is talking to Don about why he drinks and the whole generational issues that pulse through the show. the Haterz don't deserve to watch television.

Gukbe, Friday, 28 November 2008 19:37 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah, I found it refreshing after all the ooh-people-in-the-past-were-just-like-us "accessible" costume dramas. I think that in-your-face jolt to the sensibilities.

Alba, Friday, 28 November 2008 19:49 (seventeen years ago)

its obv the show is amazing from the 1st ep - then it just gets better - lol 60s complaints are purely fools desperately searching for a critical angle

― ice cr?m, Friday, November 28, 2008 8:27 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

not really

deej, Friday, 28 November 2008 20:21 (seventeen years ago)

its way over the top dude - again just seen three eps and it sounds like it gets better but right now its pretty ridiculous and kinda hamfisted

deej, Friday, 28 November 2008 20:21 (seventeen years ago)

im not 'searching' for this criticism, they hit you over the head w/ this stuff

deej, Friday, 28 November 2008 20:22 (seventeen years ago)

OK DEEJ WHATEVER FOOL

ice cr?m, Friday, 28 November 2008 20:23 (seventeen years ago)

http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/9648/no260pc.jpg xposts dammit

Manchego Bay (G00blar), Friday, 28 November 2008 20:23 (seventeen years ago)

just seen three eps and it sounds like it gets better but right now its pretty ridiculous and kinda hamfisted

I was friendly enough from the first episodes, probably because I was digging on the costumes and period details (esp. the ones they don't shout through a bullhorn), but I totally understand that criticism, and if the show had continued along those lines it would definitely have gotten old fast. But fortunately for people who haven't seen it yet, season one gets better and better, and then season two is like, whoa, this is some dark and heavy fucking shit.

fiscal liberal (kenan), Friday, 28 November 2008 23:52 (seventeen years ago)

ok cool im giving it a bunch more episodes before quitting so its allll good

i just think when youve got an actual line where dude is like "its not as if we have a space-age machine that makes an exact replica of a document!!!" its borderline austin powers territory

deej, Saturday, 29 November 2008 01:11 (seventeen years ago)

^this is shadowing of first episode of second series though.

SPOILER

Peter "One Dart" Manley (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Saturday, 29 November 2008 01:16 (seventeen years ago)

austin powers is in season 2??

deej, Saturday, 29 November 2008 01:17 (seventeen years ago)

Yeah it's not giving much away to say that the Xerox machine becomes something of a minor plot point later. But deej is right, that's cheez whiz dialogue.

fiscal liberal (kenan), Saturday, 29 November 2008 01:26 (seventeen years ago)

deej bro you should totally stop watching it now cause it sux - srsly that one guy said a thing abt a copy machine - nice observation btw

ice cr?m, Saturday, 29 November 2008 08:01 (seventeen years ago)

oh relax

fiscal liberal (kenan), Saturday, 29 November 2008 08:04 (seventeen years ago)

ty kenan what sort of other awesome offerings do you have for me tonight

ice cr?m, Saturday, 29 November 2008 08:08 (seventeen years ago)

I posted a wallpaper of Burgess Meridith that I though was cool.

fiscal liberal (kenan), Saturday, 29 November 2008 08:15 (seventeen years ago)

thoughT

fiscal liberal (kenan), Saturday, 29 November 2008 08:15 (seventeen years ago)

And anyway all I mean is, get off of deej, he'd only seen three episodes and said so. He'll come around.

fiscal liberal (kenan), Saturday, 29 November 2008 08:16 (seventeen years ago)

hamfisted!

ice cr?m, Saturday, 29 November 2008 08:17 (seventeen years ago)

Near the beginning of the thread you see that criticism a lot, worded in various crative ways.

fiscal liberal (kenan), Saturday, 29 November 2008 08:18 (seventeen years ago)

I love "hamfisted." It makes think of Hellboy, only instead of a giant fist made of hell-stuff, it's made of ham.

fiscal liberal (kenan), Saturday, 29 November 2008 08:20 (seventeen years ago)

i was just offened by his hamfisted portrayal of late 00s hack criticism - the inability to recognize great art - the wild grasping for for a conceptual foothold

its possible the whole thing went over my head and it was a parody of a kanye west thread or something- i dunno i might just stick around and read some more posts - see what he comes up with

ice cr?m, Saturday, 29 November 2008 08:23 (seventeen years ago)

yep.

fiscal liberal (kenan), Saturday, 29 November 2008 08:25 (seventeen years ago)

wtf -- i dont think im being some great art critic here, the dialogue is frequently hokey w. its "btw its the 60s" b.s. and the characters are pretty hateable -- it def seems more like a pastiche of over the top attitudes of the time and less like a realistic picture of the era, and maybe thats the point but its not really clear yet. it looks great obv but maybe you should spend more time w/ some not-hack criticism explaining why this stuff is defensible and less time being haughtily condescending while not really sayin nothin

deej, Saturday, 29 November 2008 18:39 (seventeen years ago)

apparently now making any observations whatsoever = challops???

what that ive said is so objectionably untrue?? i mean the show is full of offensive characters and attitudes and if yr just sitting thru it never-wincing like "this show is so badass!" i kind of think something is wrong w/ you ... not that its immoral art or something but obv its supposed to provoke u to think in some way rite?

deej, Saturday, 29 November 2008 18:44 (seventeen years ago)

the dialogue is frequently hokey w. its "btw its the 60s" b.s. and the characters are pretty hateable

ok wait. Who goes around filtering the kind of fiction they approve of based on how "likable" they think the characters are? I mean, apart from the congenitally dull?

Again, this is covered upthread.

fiscal liberal (kenan), Saturday, 29 November 2008 18:49 (seventeen years ago)

im not filtering anything, and im still watching the show and im going to finish the season - im just finding the characters v. unlikeable. it was simply an observation. so far there are a few characters (im now 6 eps in btw) who have the potential to be likeable but the main character isnt just 'flawed' -- hes a bad person. im basically still wondering what they're getting at or what they're trying to say in this series w/ such a selfish, negative protagonist.

deej, Saturday, 29 November 2008 18:53 (seventeen years ago)

Don Draper is a substandard piece of work, no getting around it. I'm wondering, though, if you had the same immediate reaction to Tony Soprano after a few episodes, or Michael Corleone, or whatever list you care to draft of anti-heroes. OF COURSE he's a bad person. That's not the end of the story, though. He's bad and he's attractive, and those qualities feed off each other and reinforce each other, and for all the silly "OMG it's the 60's" baloney in the first few episodes (and a few missteps in the writing here and the otherwise, like the whole thing with the beatniks), it really is going somewhere.

I don't think when someone says that a protagonist is "flawed" they mean anywhere near the same thing as if they describe a real person as "flawed." I mean, you wouldn't hang out with Hamlet, but damned if his stupid self-indulgent bullshit isn't essential reading.

fiscal liberal (kenan), Saturday, 29 November 2008 19:04 (seventeen years ago)

I mean, even "repulsive" isn't out of the question when you're talking about a fictional character, right? Most of my favorite fictional characters are monsters in one way or another, and it's not because I think they're all cool and drive Trans Ams and shit. Bad people happen in good fiction because they are hard to get your head around. That's WHY they are there.

fiscal liberal (kenan), Saturday, 29 November 2008 19:09 (seventeen years ago)

im a few episodes in here and it just seems real stereotypical and hackneyed. I mean all these black dudes in the hood standing around selling drugs and like listening to rap while the cops try to get them - its sort of a law and order rip off. and whats up w/this guy avon barksdale - lol cliched drug kingpin. the whole thing is kind of racist if you ask me. but i dunno ill keep watching and see what happens.

― deej, Tuesday, Feruary 5th, 2003 5:23 PM (5 Years ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

ice cr?m, Saturday, 29 November 2008 19:13 (seventeen years ago)

lol

Millsner, Saturday, 29 November 2008 19:32 (seventeen years ago)

It's not that hard. When you read Crime and Punishment you kind of root for Raskolnikov, right? Everybody does. And yet, the man is vermin. He has enough distance that he can see the world, but he does not have the ability or courage to pull back just a little further and see himself. That's the template.

fiscal liberal (kenan), Saturday, 29 November 2008 19:42 (seventeen years ago)

id totally kick it w/raskolnikov and don draper

ice cr?m, Saturday, 29 November 2008 19:44 (seventeen years ago)

j/k not really

id bro down w/roger sterling tho

ice cr?m, Saturday, 29 November 2008 19:46 (seventeen years ago)

They would drink me under the table in fifteen minutes.

fiscal liberal (kenan), Saturday, 29 November 2008 19:48 (seventeen years ago)

troo

ice cr?m, Saturday, 29 November 2008 19:50 (seventeen years ago)

I wasn't completely sold on the show until the Hobo Code episode, FWIW. Give it 'til then (ep 8?) at least.

sad man in him room (milo z), Saturday, 29 November 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)

Who goes around filtering the kind of fiction they approve of based on how "likable" they think the characters are? I mean, apart from the congenitally dull?

haha i do this. but i never claimed not to be dull.

horseshoe, Saturday, 29 November 2008 22:06 (seventeen years ago)

i like this show and deej, i think you will end up liking it, too, but the unlikeableness of the characters makes it an uncomfortable viewing experience for me sometimes.

horseshoe, Saturday, 29 November 2008 22:07 (seventeen years ago)

as tehresa said upthread, the hamfisted-ness is purposeful and pays off in a big way.

horseshoe, Saturday, 29 November 2008 22:08 (seventeen years ago)

also whatever to characterization in crime and punishment being likened to characterization in mad men!

horseshoe, Saturday, 29 November 2008 22:10 (seventeen years ago)

Thanks hs that's what I was wondering about. Jho u picked the wrong example with the wire - that's exactly the show i'm comparing these first few eps to in my head and it falls way short. The wire is a show of flawed and very human characters and by comparison a lot of the characters so far have been pretty caricaturish so far. Like I said though i'm not giving up on it or anything and the mystery of the draper seems pretty gripping, plus I like the dept store chick

deej, Saturday, 29 November 2008 22:22 (seventeen years ago)

listen deej im sorry if i gave you too hard of a time but you will feel silly for yr initial characterization - somewhat you can already see that - cause if the show really exhibited the qualities yr describing why would you want to watch more

obv we dont know till its run is through but mad men along w/maybe the sopranos and deadwood are the only two shows thatve exhibited in their early seasons potential to be wire level good

ice cr?m, Saturday, 29 November 2008 22:27 (seventeen years ago)

mad men is a show of flawed and very human characters too; I don't want to rag on you deej, wd just recommend to stick with it, at least until the later eps of season 2

czn (cozwn), Saturday, 29 November 2008 22:34 (seventeen years ago)

Mad Men season 1 is $19.99 on iTunes, should I buy it as a quick way into the show for a long plane ride... Or does the show demand to be watched on a big ol TV screen?

uәʇɹɐƃu!әʍ ˙ƃ ʎәu!Ⴁʍ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 1 December 2008 02:54 (seventeen years ago)

I mean, all shows do, yes. But I mean, would I be ruining the show for myself?

uәʇɹɐƃu!әʍ ˙ƃ ʎәu!Ⴁʍ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 1 December 2008 02:56 (seventeen years ago)

no, i watched a lot of it on my computer and still loved it

:) Mrs Edward Cullen XD (max), Monday, 1 December 2008 02:57 (seventeen years ago)

it is a gorgeous show tho so watch it again on a big tv when you get home

:) Mrs Edward Cullen XD (max), Monday, 1 December 2008 02:57 (seventeen years ago)

i just got series 1 and watched it all over the weekend, fantastic.

fela cooties (haitch), Monday, 1 December 2008 03:39 (seventeen years ago)

only one disc left - disc 3 has def had the most interesting eps so far imo, hobo code is great and so is the one that finishes ***SPOILERZZZZ**** w/ mrs draper shooting @ the pigeons

deej, Monday, 1 December 2008 21:44 (seventeen years ago)

Like Deadwood, I think this show is at it's best when it starts focussing on wimmins.

UEK - Big Tempin' (Oilyrags), Monday, 1 December 2008 21:45 (seventeen years ago)

mrs draper shooting @ the pigeons

:)

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i191/fluxion23/shoot.jpg

fiscal liberal (kenan), Tuesday, 2 December 2008 05:16 (seventeen years ago)

it is a gorgeous show tho so watch it again on a big tv when you get home

Even if this show was terrible I'd probably still watch it because it is lovely to look at.

Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 2 December 2008 05:20 (seventeen years ago)

Like Deadwood, I think this show is at it's best when it starts focussing on wimmins.

I almost agreed with this, but then decided that it's unfair to the men. You can't have Trixie without Swearengen, and Swearengen isn't half as sympathetic without Trixie. Women and men... we live together.

fiscal liberal (kenan), Tuesday, 2 December 2008 05:21 (seventeen years ago)

Tony and Carmella, locked in eternal conflict, etc.

fiscal liberal (kenan), Tuesday, 2 December 2008 05:25 (seventeen years ago)

also whatever to characterization in crime and punishment being likened to characterization in mad men!

Yeah I'll take that one back. I was talking with Julia about Crime and Punishment the other day, and it came to mind all easy-like as an example of a terrible character that doesn't lose your attention even long after he loses your sympathy.

I should read Crime and Punishment again, actually. What a fun/heady book.

fiscal liberal (kenan), Tuesday, 2 December 2008 05:30 (seventeen years ago)

(Also wtf with there being no Deadwood threads in ilx? I mean, there are three or four, but they're all really short and there's no big discussion on any of them. I guess it's too late to notice that.)

fiscal liberal (kenan), Tuesday, 2 December 2008 05:46 (seventeen years ago)

finished first season -- u guys were right that the 2nd half is so much stronger than the first half

i stand by the stuff i said upthread about parts of this show being extremely off-putting - still amazingly well done and i want to see more.

i think most interesting to me is the understanding of the personal philosophies of the ppl at the time

deej, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 10:28 (seventeen years ago)

so when is s2 out on dvd

deej, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 10:32 (seventeen years ago)

just torrent it dude

t_g, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 11:00 (seventeen years ago)

He doesn't wan to get stuck with a whole seasons worth of rick astley videos

beyonc'e (max), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 12:40 (seventeen years ago)

spoilers, deej, do not read

this episode was a motherfucker

the tension bewtween his california existence and everything back east leaves no doubt as to why don would want to never go home - but obv he cant out run himself

his life is suddenly full of possibilities - loved the hinted future job introducing hotrod culture to the world

― 888 (ice crӕm), Monday, 20 October 2008 19:16 (1 month ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah, true, but there's the scene at the end of tht episode where joy's bro turns up with the kid, don's sitting in the pool with a drink and he looks at the kid and he looks at the eurotrash and for a moment you can kinda for the first time see tht he might actually love betty and tht he might actually want to go back (which ultimately leads to his quite sincere love letter to betty)

xposts obv

czn (cozwn), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 13:35 (seventeen years ago)

How could anyone not want "Together Forever"? xp

Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 13:36 (seventeen years ago)

oh man if this show ran for 10 seasons and we got up into the 70s what would happen

czn (cozwn), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 13:37 (seventeen years ago)

no doubt this show is wire-level good

WHEN IS NEXT SEASON

czn (cozwn), Tuesday, 9 December 2008 13:42 (seventeen years ago)

fuck man i just want them to confirm matthew weiner's on board.

t_g, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 13:52 (seventeen years ago)

that times piece posted upthread seemed to imply that he basically is the show so i dont know who they could go on w/out him

deej, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 23:31 (seventeen years ago)

Aaron Sorkin

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 23:40 (seventeen years ago)

Think somebody already said this, but I pretty much love Aaron Sorkin but he would completely and utterly destroy this show. Straight up, scorched earth destroy.

en i see kay, Tuesday, 9 December 2008 23:43 (seventeen years ago)

maybe the point is that the West Wing went on without Sorkin though he basically was the show?

skeletal lexing (Finefinemusic), Wednesday, 10 December 2008 02:27 (seventeen years ago)

i always get a little excited when i hear the theme music coming from the upstairs neighbors even though i have seen all the eps. it's like i can live vicariously through their viewing!

very quotatious (tehresa), Wednesday, 10 December 2008 04:20 (seventeen years ago)

no doubt this show is wire-level good

It's a good show, but no fucking way. It's not even Deadwood or Rome good.

sad man in him room (milo z), Wednesday, 10 December 2008 05:21 (seventeen years ago)

Also wtf with there being no Deadwood threads in ilx? I mean, there are three or four, but they're all really short and there's no big discussion on any of them.

??? this thread is not short. the season 2 and 3 ones are shorter, true. can't help it if ppl weren't watching it when it was actually on (and a few more viewers might have been enough to get us a season 4 damn it).

tipsy mothra, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 06:35 (seventeen years ago)

I disagree, milo, but w/e

czn (cozwn), Wednesday, 10 December 2008 08:09 (seventeen years ago)

i havent seen deadwood but o_O at ROME being better than this show

beyonc'e (max), Wednesday, 10 December 2008 10:15 (seventeen years ago)

more like o_O at anything else on tv being better than ROME

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 10 December 2008 10:18 (seventeen years ago)

lol rome sux 4 sure

Lafayette Lever hi wtf (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 10 December 2008 12:58 (seventeen years ago)

http://pics.livejournal.com/sterling_cooper/pic/000030hq.gif

Dan I., Tuesday, 16 December 2008 15:04 (seventeen years ago)

haha gross

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 16 December 2008 15:05 (seventeen years ago)

wowowow that is mesmerizing

johnny crunch, Tuesday, 16 December 2008 15:19 (seventeen years ago)

i recommend Jimi Tenor as the audio accompaniment to that gif.

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Tuesday, 16 December 2008 22:41 (seventeen years ago)

already linked bt ppl shd read this if you like being infuriated by ppl getting it wrong

http://www.lrb.co.uk/v30/n20/grei01_.html

cozwn, Tuesday, 16 December 2008 23:08 (seventeen years ago)

some choice paragraphs

"Hamm looks perpetually wimpy and underslept. His face is powdered and doughy. He lacks command. He is witless. The pose that he’s best at, interestingly, is leaning back in his chair; it ought to be from superiority, but it looks as though he is trying to dodge a blow. Draper is supposed to have a deep secret, but it would make sense only if that secret were his weakness – fearfulness or femininity – instead of the show’s anticlimactic revelation that his mother was a whore and he picked up another man’s identity on the battlefield in Korea: bizarre Gothicisms that belong to some other series. One never sees hunger or anger in Hamm’s eyes, only the misery of the hunted fox. Either he is playing the hero as a schlub in deference to a 21st-century idea of masculinity as fundamentally hollow and sham, or he’s completely underequipped to convey male menace."

cozwn, Tuesday, 16 December 2008 23:08 (seventeen years ago)

The Sopranos, the programme for which Mad Men’s creator Matthew Weiner worked as a writer before getting his own series, is often invoked by journalists as a godparent to the newer show. The two share a focus on the world of men, a primary relationship between an older, world-weary boss and a sneaky young turk, even a psychiatrist figure who pops up to allow a character to express what can’t be said at home. Unfortunately for Mad Men, the example of The Sopranos shows up all the possibilities of the medium that aren’t exploited in Weiner’s show. And unfortunately for Jon Hamm, James Gandolfini’s depiction of Tony Soprano shows the kind of man Don Draper might have been: someone in whom strength and weakness, allure and cruel cunning, were held in balance, through an alternation of authority, neediness and physical violence.

cozwn, Tuesday, 16 December 2008 23:09 (seventeen years ago)

And unfortunately for Jon Hamm, James Gandolfini’s depiction of Tony Soprano shows the kind of man Don Draper might have been: someone in whom strength and weakness, allure and cruel cunning, were held in balance, through an alternation of authority, neediness and physical violence.And unfortunately for Jon Hamm, James Gandolfini’s depiction of Tony Soprano shows the kind of man Don Draper might have been: someone in whom strength and weakness, allure and cruel cunning, were held in balance, through an alternation of authority, neediness and physical violence.And unfortunately for Jon Hamm, James Gandolfini’s depiction of Tony Soprano shows the kind of man Don Draper might have been: someone in whom strength and weakness, allure and cruel cunning, were held in balance, through an alternation of authority, neediness and physical violence.And unfortunately for Jon Hamm, James Gandolfini’s depiction of Tony Soprano shows the kind of man Don Draper might have been: someone in whom strength and weakness, allure and cruel cunning, were held in balance, through an alternation of authority, neediness and physical violence.And unfortunately for Jon Hamm, James Gandolfini’s depiction of Tony Soprano shows the kind of man Don Draper might have been: someone in whom strength and weakness, allure and cruel cunning, were held in balance, through an alternation of authority, neediness and physical violence.And unfortunately for Jon Hamm, James Gandolfini’s depiction of Tony Soprano shows the kind of man Don Draper might have been: someone in whom strength and weakness, allure and cruel cunning, were held in balance, through an alternation of authority, neediness and physical violence.And unfortunately for Jon Hamm, James Gandolfini’s depiction of Tony Soprano shows the kind of man Don Draper might have been: someone in whom strength and weakness, allure and cruel cunning, were held in balance, through an alternation of authority, neediness and physical violence.

cozwn, Tuesday, 16 December 2008 23:09 (seventeen years ago)

ugh

Millsner, Tuesday, 16 December 2008 23:26 (seventeen years ago)

there isn't a psychiatrist character on mad men except in like two episodes.

akm, Tuesday, 16 December 2008 23:26 (seventeen years ago)

Wow

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 16 December 2008 23:28 (seventeen years ago)

He lacks command. He is witless.

Project much, dude?

Nicolars (Nicole), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 01:04 (seventeen years ago)

im two eps into season 1...some real nice stuff so far ("It's just the new happiness"--such a cutting line condensing an entire critique of postwar America in a few words!)...but I hope it gets better overall.

ryan, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 01:07 (seventeen years ago)

As I think virtually everyone ever has agreed, it gets better.

Alex in SF, Wednesday, 17 December 2008 01:07 (seventeen years ago)

That LRB article is pretty much a dead on example of what happens when I writer gets a commission they can't be bothered with, watches the first ten minutes of the series, and tries to imagine what the rest of it could be like from that.

Seannadams Molloy (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Wednesday, 17 December 2008 01:08 (seventeen years ago)

fuckin n+1

ice cr?m is right: this show started awesome and got even better. the lol60s stuff is the equiv of the lolgodfather stuff in early eps of 'the sopranos'.

love the idea of it always going foward a year+ or whatever. roll on 1964.

Usic Has The Right To Children (special guest stars mark bronson), Friday, 19 December 2008 14:49 (seventeen years ago)

nah mate unfortunately for jon hamm, james gandolfini’s depiction of tony soprano shows the kind of man don draper might have been: someone in whom strength and weakness, allure and cruel cunning, were held in balance, through an alternation of authority, neediness and physical violence

one of the most disgusting savages in all the world imo (cozwn), Friday, 19 December 2008 14:52 (seventeen years ago)

to quote bron waugh (really): i thought i understood the english language well enough, but just what the fucking, soddding, shitting hell is this idiotic sentence trying to tell us?

Usic Has The Right To Children (special guest stars mark bronson), Friday, 19 December 2008 14:54 (seventeen years ago)

LOOOOOOOOOL OMG HOW I LOLD LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL ^^^^^ XD XD XD !!!

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 24 December 2008 15:08 (seventeen years ago)

lol@jho

did you hear dude that unfortunately for jon hamm, james gandolfini’s depiction of tony soprano shows the kind of man don draper might have been: someone in whom strength and weakness, allure and cruel cunning, were held in balance, through an alternation of authority, neediness and physical violence?

smooth challoperator (cozwn), Wednesday, 24 December 2008 22:19 (seventeen years ago)

tony soprano is a fat pig

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 24 December 2008 22:23 (seventeen years ago)

a fat pig, in whom strength and weakness, allure and cruel cunning, are held in balance, through an alternation of authority, neediness, and gay, awful, horrible, house music

            (☪), Wednesday, 24 December 2008 23:25 (seventeen years ago)

I love this show but Pete Campbell reminds me of a young Dave Foley sometimes.

Every Day Jimmy Mod Is Hustlin' (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Friday, 2 January 2009 22:22 (seventeen years ago)

i made my dad dvds of season two and he thought there was just one ep on each dvd when there was two and called me up being all are there more than 7 i need more - he watched every other episode loooooool - i had a nice laugh at his expense

❤¯\㋡/¯❤ (ice cr?m), Friday, 2 January 2009 22:36 (seventeen years ago)

Ouch.

Alex in SF, Friday, 2 January 2009 22:38 (seventeen years ago)

Probably also wanted some explanations!

Alex in SF, Friday, 2 January 2009 22:39 (seventeen years ago)

he was like well u know the show jumps around a lot and leaves things hanging and stuff - and i was all yah especially if u only watch every other episode lololololol

❤¯\㋡/¯❤ (ice cr?m), Friday, 2 January 2009 22:41 (seventeen years ago)

Oh man, I wish I'd been posting here three months ago, instead of saving the second season on DVR due to early-episode boringness! I don't think Pete's a sociopath, honestly -- is this bad if I say I usually feel like I can understand him? He's this bad combination of someone who was born to a ton of entitlement and someone who's actually ambitious and puts in effort for what he wants -- and so he's constantly frustrated by the fact that it's never going to be All About Pete. His parents will never be impressed with him and will hold him in slight contempt; he'll have to do what his wife wants, and be beholden to his in-laws for things he never wanted; he'll have to scramble for his bosses ... despite whatever expectations he had about adult life, it's not going to include any real kind of independence. He's kind of a funny mirror for Don, really, in that many of the things he wants are things Don has, but the difference is that Don has gotten what he has in part by being completely free of and removed from other people and completely severed from who he actually is -- whereas Pete's whole problem is that he's completely tied to his place in relation to other people, and can't seem to handle the way he's beholden to others.

nabisco, Friday, 2 January 2009 22:45 (seventeen years ago)

I think the show has gone a long way towards explaining why Pete is the way he is, but I don't think that makes him any less of a sociopath.

Alex in SF, Friday, 2 January 2009 22:47 (seventeen years ago)

I don't get what's actually sociopathic of him, or what he's done that comes off that way: trying to expose Don? Chafing against his wife's needs? There's this sense that he's too ambitious and constantly frustrated (and completely repressed) in this seething way where you wouldn't be surprised if he went nuts one day and slit someone's throat, sure, but I don't see how his character is inherently necessarily sociopathic, if you see what I mean.

nabisco, Friday, 2 January 2009 22:52 (seventeen years ago)

i get the no idea what its like to be a human vibe from pete - zero empathy - great character btw

❤¯\㋡/¯❤ (ice cr?m), Friday, 2 January 2009 22:54 (seventeen years ago)

^^^ ding ding ding

Alex in SF, Friday, 2 January 2009 23:02 (seventeen years ago)

my understanding is that sociopathy is characterized by a certain kind of emotional detachment & inability to "feel" strongly (plus a certain kind of charisma/magnetism)--i mean i guess you could argue that this is the case w/ pete but youd be hard-pressed (he seems to feel TOO MUCH sort of). meanwhile don is detached, unable to feel (maybe?) and charismatic. if one of the characters is a sociopath its don more than pete but im unconvinced that don is a sociopath either esp given the turn of the last 3-4 episodes

8====D ------ ㋡ (max), Friday, 2 January 2009 23:03 (seventeen years ago)

heres a nyer article on psycho/sociopaths http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2008/11/10/081110fa_fact_seabrook?currentPage=all

❤¯\㋡/¯❤ (ice cr?m), Friday, 2 January 2009 23:05 (seventeen years ago)

But you're right it's not any particular action he's taken that makes him sociopathic it's the complete lack of human empathy the guy has combined with his insane self-absorbtion. I mean the conversation with Draper about his dad's death or with Peggy about his wife or Freddie, it's like this is a guy who has no clear idea what human emotions are even supposed to be and his seems almost baffled that other people around him feel them. Not to mention he has a sense of entitlement that borders on the megalomaniacal.

Alex in SF, Friday, 2 January 2009 23:08 (seventeen years ago)

That was in response to nabisco.

Alex in SF, Friday, 2 January 2009 23:09 (seventeen years ago)

Agree that Don behavior could also be defined as sociopathic. He is a creepy dude too.

Alex in SF, Friday, 2 January 2009 23:18 (seventeen years ago)

That detachment issue is part of why I wonder about the description, and respond more to the "feel too much" one -- part of the guy seems to be constantly cowering inside himself, feeling frustrated and impotent that he doesn't have more control over his position. His emotional tenor seems like that of a 9-year-old playing a board game -- a 9-year-old who always gets picked on and is now insanely invested in winning, and will knock over the board and cry if he doesn't. (Or, better yet, a 9-year-old who is expected to sit politely in a suit and not be 9 years old, and can almost pull it off: I mean, recall how much delight he took in not doing what his wife wanted and instead getting a rifle?) Maybe this all depends on whether you interpret his outward demeanor as "truthful" or as that of someone who's trying very hard to play the role he's supposed to. (Which is another reason I wonder about "sociopath," I guess, because he strikes me as being somewhat of his time, this person who -- even in interactions with his wife -- is playing a role more so than genuinely inhabiting it. I could see how you'd mention sociopathy to talk about that, but it also seems rather ... period.) It's really weird for me to imagine that he doesn't understand human emotions -- it always seems to me that he has and shows plenty of them (usually insecure, scared, petulant ones), but is constantly putting up a mask of not being like that, like a stiff repressed blueblood up-and-comer should.

nabisco, Friday, 2 January 2009 23:21 (seventeen years ago)

yah pete seems like an insecure narcissist not really a sociopath

Lamp, Friday, 2 January 2009 23:27 (seventeen years ago)

I think he exhibits human emotions. It's his understand of other humans' emotions that's completely lacking.

Alex in SF, Friday, 2 January 2009 23:27 (seventeen years ago)

I think we are splitting hairs here. I think we all agree he's a creepy fucking dude.

Alex in SF, Friday, 2 January 2009 23:28 (seventeen years ago)

I will say that Pete has fallen below Duck and Roger on my Mad Men jerk-o-meter.

Alex in SF, Friday, 2 January 2009 23:29 (seventeen years ago)

Haha yeah, I'm just scared of saying "creepy" because I sort feel like I can understand where the guy is coming from ;_;

nabisco, Friday, 2 January 2009 23:30 (seventeen years ago)

Quick, someone write a play where Pete Campbell and Ziggy from The Wire have dinner together

nabisco, Friday, 2 January 2009 23:32 (seventeen years ago)

idk hes gotten less creepy imo sometimes his inability to grant other ppl any kind of agency separate from his own is kind of tragic like with peggy he seems genuinely puzzled by how they view the world and almost wounded by his inability to truly empathize

Lamp, Friday, 2 January 2009 23:33 (seventeen years ago)

I always thought Petes emotional difficulty was less abt an psychic disease and more abt being a wasp--if you think "not understanding how to show regret/sorrow/sympathy" counts as aociopathy you should stay away from my grandfather. iow it's not that he doesn't understand sorrow he just has no idea how to show or express it--and well.... Welcome to a generation or two of masculinity

8====D ------ ㋡ (max), Saturday, 3 January 2009 00:14 (seventeen years ago)

I think you are misreading what I (and I think most people) find so creepy about Pete. It's not his inability to display emotion. It's his almost alien response to (and complete inability to read/fathom) other people's emotions. And all these guys are wasps (from the same era.) His behavior sets him apart. And if your grandpa was like him, well I feel bad for your father/mother/both.

Alex in SF, Saturday, 3 January 2009 00:21 (seventeen years ago)

Auto-links to Richard Yates are appropriate re freaked-out white collar male drunks, but n.a. insofar as the Mad Men get *some* degree of fulfillment/gratification from their jobs, or believe it's there to be gotten, while the Revolutionary Road guy feels nullified by his job. As with the Sopranos, women have to find their own way through the maze, even more than the men (and women who work with the Mad Men maybe most of all, we'll see). Betty seems like extention of Carmela Soprano, who never (SPOILER ALERT) practiced adultery-by-proxy as mental revenge and possible sociopathy (re fucking up friends and friendships, anyway) But before praticing it in person, even. She got some of her stern side, and her sense of maleness, from her father ("he'd fine us for small talk," said approvingly, and indignantly vs. her poor stepmother, disoriented by father's dementia). Bridges burned--so that may be one reason she can relate more to Don now (plus the uncertainty re unplanned pregnancy, and he was already acting penitent). (Oh yeah, she wanted him to spank their son: "Your father beat you, you turned out okay"--or something close to that!) But she's still a sympathetic character, when dealing with that neglected runaway kid, and conversation with his mother--the range of responses in all that--insofar as she's a sympathetic character, adds to the sense of volatility, of anything-can-happen (as with Don, Pete, Peggy, all of 'em maybe, in different degrees, moments)

dow, Saturday, 3 January 2009 01:18 (seventeen years ago)

omg season 2 episode 9 with the extended frankie five angels death scenes where they fired Freddie is just a delightful hour of acting. I also lol'd @ the "hey isn't that the champ?" bit in the casino; I was like "o hai it's going to be Sonny Liston" and like "nope; Floyd Patterson... he gets destroyed a few months after..."

Every Day Jimmy Mod Is Hustlin' (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Saturday, 3 January 2009 18:22 (seventeen years ago)

i feel sorry for pete. for his wife a bit too, obviously, but she isn't a major character, but the show isn't all 'omg wot a sociopath', and he's less of that than don.

Jordan Sarging (Brohan Hari), Saturday, 3 January 2009 18:32 (seventeen years ago)

latest news no news? http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117998240.html

ice cr?m, Saturday, 10 January 2009 07:15 (seventeen years ago)

weiner is holding out for (choose one):
-- more money
-- the all-singing dream-sequence episode
-- the sex scene w/peggy and the priest
-- the pete-on-acid episode
-- betty's baby being black (w/flashback to that ray charles show she snuck out to)

tipsy mothra, Saturday, 10 January 2009 07:28 (seventeen years ago)

prexy
cabler
skedded
sesh
thesp
nommed

Gorgeous Preppy (G00blar), Saturday, 10 January 2009 12:11 (seventeen years ago)

-- the pete-on-acid episode

omg want ^^^

ice cr?m, Saturday, 10 January 2009 14:08 (seventeen years ago)

amazing.

Millsner, Saturday, 10 January 2009 16:07 (seventeen years ago)

i'm glad that AMC is the new HBO, cuz it's basic cable and i don't have to pay extra for it.

akm, Saturday, 10 January 2009 16:28 (seventeen years ago)

u guys watch breaking bad cause its pretty sweet too

ice cr?m, Saturday, 10 January 2009 16:32 (seventeen years ago)

still no news, but this doesnt sound v good - http://defamer.com/5129893/unsigned-mad-men-creator-sounds-ominous-season-3-alarm

t_g, Tuesday, 13 January 2009 17:21 (seventeen years ago)

Dimo
8:16 PM on Mon Jan 12 2009
I don't care what happens to this show as long as you keep posting all these Christina Hendricks pics.

ILX epitaph

The boy with the Arab money (The stickman from the hilarious 'xkcd' comics), Tuesday, 13 January 2009 17:23 (seventeen years ago)

kind of lol but mostly just pay him the fucking money amc

special guest stars mark bronson, Tuesday, 13 January 2009 17:46 (seventeen years ago)

Seriously, I don't understand the holdup here. For all the crowing that AMC does about the awards this show raked in, they haven't shown much interest in keeping the guy most responsible for that success around.

Millsner, Wednesday, 14 January 2009 03:49 (seventeen years ago)

signed for two more seasons!

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117998730.html?categoryid=14&cs=1

Gukbe, Saturday, 17 January 2009 03:29 (seventeen years ago)

first 30 rock now Mad Men. have to say it was a good day

Every Day Jimmy Mod Is Hustlin' (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Saturday, 17 January 2009 04:26 (seventeen years ago)

The week would be perfect if so many people watched Friday Night Lights tonight that NBC automatically renewed it.

I think I'm reaching too far.

Gukbe, Saturday, 17 January 2009 04:29 (seventeen years ago)

two weeks pass...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mrfrothy/sets/72157608478519938/

http://www.lippsisters.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/bobbleheads.jpg

Limoncello Carlin (The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics), Wednesday, 4 February 2009 16:28 (seventeen years ago)

animated .gif otherwise they're fake

JtM Is Ruled By A Black Man (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 4 February 2009 16:34 (seventeen years ago)

one month passes...

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 10 March 2009 23:18 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/f26c4046b0/lex-luthor-bailout-with-jon-hamm

Thrills as Cheap as Gas (Oilyrags), Wednesday, 11 March 2009 22:19 (seventeen years ago)

ive been rewatching S1 and hildy's quiet contempt for pete is a true delight

°° × Þ°))·ΞЊ (Lamp), Thursday, 12 March 2009 18:00 (seventeen years ago)

one month passes...

when does season 3 start?

tehresa, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 23:25 (sixteen years ago)

^^^

the most naturally gifted poster of his generation (cozwn), Tuesday, 14 April 2009 23:49 (sixteen years ago)

everything says 'summer' and that is vague :(

tehresa, Tuesday, 14 April 2009 23:49 (sixteen years ago)

Production starts in a couple weeks. So it'll be awhile.

mayor jingleberries, Wednesday, 15 April 2009 00:18 (sixteen years ago)

I reckon August

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 15 April 2009 00:21 (sixteen years ago)

wonder if theyll do another time jump - last season was kinda cliff hanger - i could see them just starting it two years later w/don at the head of the company tho

c?rvel (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 15 April 2009 02:23 (sixteen years ago)

Weiner indicated in an interview that he plans to jump 1-2 years between each season, with an ideal run of about 5 seasons. That should take us to end of the '60s, at least.

I can see Season 3 opening late '63, just in time for the Kennedy assassination.

Millsner, Wednesday, 15 April 2009 03:14 (sixteen years ago)

one month passes...

SPOILERRRRRRRRRRR

i think an ascendent pete seems like a pretty safe bet; he was getting all plucky.
i thought of a way better ending for s2; they should have changed the order of betty's trip to the bar and the result of betty's test. would have been so much better consequentially.

corps of discovery (schlump), Tuesday, 2 June 2009 02:01 (sixteen years ago)

Season 3 = August 16th.

Jouster, Tuesday, 2 June 2009 04:19 (sixteen years ago)

oooooh

the season 2 dvd comes out july 14.

Emotivism, aka the yay/boo theory (get bent), Tuesday, 2 June 2009 04:26 (sixteen years ago)

Finally started watching all these in order (thx Comcast)... this show is really, really good.

Kitchen Paper Towel (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 15 June 2009 18:59 (sixteen years ago)

yeah same. i'm halfway thru s1 and its great

am0n, Friday, 19 June 2009 14:29 (sixteen years ago)

Got S1 on blu-ray yesterday and S2 pre-ordered. Haven't seen any of S2 yet and am avoiding reading about it. Love love love love this show.

Jaq, Friday, 19 June 2009 14:32 (sixteen years ago)

i still have trouble understanding how ppl can love this at first -- its a really hard show to love early on imho, on purpose

autogucci cru (deej), Saturday, 20 June 2009 09:28 (sixteen years ago)

some people are design sluts.

Batsman (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Saturday, 20 June 2009 09:31 (sixteen years ago)

I think I just admired the first episode and thought "this is a show I want to stick with". I think by episode 3 or 4, I loved it.

Alba, Saturday, 20 June 2009 09:45 (sixteen years ago)

the design prob was a part of it at first for me

just sayin, Saturday, 20 June 2009 10:00 (sixteen years ago)

yah it always looks good but its pretty offensive otherwse!

autogucci cru (deej), Saturday, 20 June 2009 12:17 (sixteen years ago)

so's your mom

still counting on porcupine racetrack (G00blar), Saturday, 20 June 2009 13:36 (sixteen years ago)

touche

autogucci cru (deej), Saturday, 20 June 2009 22:03 (sixteen years ago)

Watched the first episode last night in HD - so gorgeous and also so much "Whoa! I missed that last time" stuff. I haven't seen any of season 2 yet - have to get it all watched asap.

Jaq, Monday, 22 June 2009 17:19 (sixteen years ago)

the thing with peggy finding out she's pregnant minutes before giving birth was pretty lame

am0n, Monday, 22 June 2009 17:34 (sixteen years ago)

otm, that's the low point of the show so far imo
s2 is even better than s1 once it gets rolling.

dmr, Monday, 22 June 2009 17:40 (sixteen years ago)

I think I just admired the first episode and thought "this is a show I want to stick with". I think by episode 3 or 4, I loved it.

Yeah, 'intrigued' was my initial reaction. That and 'Ooo, this is pretty'. Now I've just finished watching the whole thing for the second time and it is fucking phenomenal.

chap, Monday, 22 June 2009 18:01 (sixteen years ago)

peggy finding out she's pregnant minutes before giving birth was pretty lame

Maybe. I know someone irl this happened to (naive, in denial, ignored the physical symptoms etc), so it seemed plausible enough, if far fetched.

Jaq, Monday, 22 June 2009 18:17 (sixteen years ago)

^^^there is a whole show on TLC about this phenomenon

Kitchen Paper Towel (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 22 June 2009 18:25 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, 'intrigued' was my initial reaction. That and 'Ooo, this is pretty'. Now I've just finished watching the whole thing for the second time and it is fucking phenomenal.

^^^this too. It was one of those things I caught on TV at random and mentally logged as being worth noting, but it wasn't until going back and watching the whole thing that I was really floored by it.

Kitchen Paper Towel (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 22 June 2009 18:26 (sixteen years ago)

re: spoiler about changing order of betty's discoveries, i understand yr point but disagree--her knowledge of her pregnancy colors her actions throughout the ep in a really interesting way, leading up to her deciding just what to tell don in that last scene

W i l l, Monday, 22 June 2009 18:30 (sixteen years ago)

I really went off this through the second half of the second season -- I suppose the bland way to put it was that I started feeling very sick of Don/Dick and began to feel that, no matter how much significance was being ladled on his situation, he really didn't have any grand dramatic conflict going on that was of much interest. It seemed to be sending him around to be brooding and significant and unknowable, and I think I checked out on that quite a bit. It's worse in retrospect: I know I enjoyed watching a lot of the second season, but when I think back on it my feelings just aren't that fond.

nabisco, Monday, 22 June 2009 18:32 (sixteen years ago)

i just found it kinda perfunctory - everything playing out in a sort of expectable way (which isn't bad, because fifties-shit happening to fifties-families is kinda the point), all revolutionary road, where as the reshuffle wouldn't have pushed the barriers of what the audience could believe (betty already on the brink, etc) while leading to a hyper-convoluted multi-layered situation.

the heart is a lonely hamster (schlump), Monday, 22 June 2009 18:34 (sixteen years ago)

i definitely dug the second season but i could have used a lot more peggy and a little less don

rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Monday, 22 June 2009 18:37 (sixteen years ago)

i coulda used a lot more JOAN, amirite fellas?

but seriously though, this show is fucking great.

FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Monday, 22 June 2009 18:41 (sixteen years ago)

Maybe. I know someone irl this happened to (naive, in denial, ignored the physical symptoms etc), so it seemed plausible enough, if far fetched.

― Jaq, Monday, June 22, 2009 2:17 PM

i was going to ask how often that happens. i think if they spaced her finding out and giving birth between two episodes it would've worked a little better. aside from that her storyline up to that point was the best part of the show.

am0n, Monday, 22 June 2009 18:46 (sixteen years ago)

i coulda used a lot more JOAN, amirite fellas?

― FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Monday, June 22, 2009 2:41 PM

don's wife >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joan imo >:B

am0n, Monday, 22 June 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

Joan is like a robot. A very sexy robot. Like, she's incredibly hot, but she'd probably peel back her skin to reveal she's a lizard afterwards and then bite your head off

Kitchen Paper Towel (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 22 June 2009 18:55 (sixteen years ago)

^^ehhhhhh

don's wife >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> joan imo >:B

― am0n, Monday, June 22, 2009 8:47 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah, almost there on this one: at first i thought maybe liking the blue-eyed blonde was a bit obvious, but i kind of think she is best actor in the show now (her vs pete imo) and she's my 'favourite character'. but redheads 4 life.

FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Monday, 22 June 2009 19:00 (sixteen years ago)

she was a lot less impressive on that one Law & Order

nabisco, Monday, 22 June 2009 19:04 (sixteen years ago)

Joan>>>Betty. I'd go for a bit of Rachel Menken myself.

chap, Monday, 22 June 2009 19:07 (sixteen years ago)

I'd go for a bit of Rachel Menken "Getting Married" woman myself.

still counting on porcupine racetrack (G00blar), Monday, 22 June 2009 19:11 (sixteen years ago)

i kind of think she is best actor in the show now (her vs pete imo)

you gotta be kidding, guy who plays pete is one of the worst actors ive ever seen. he often makes me 'snap out' and realise it's a tv show, feel faintly embarrassed for how bad he is, shown up so much more by the skillz of the other actors

NI, Monday, 22 June 2009 19:38 (sixteen years ago)

that means the acting's working

still counting on porcupine racetrack (G00blar), Monday, 22 June 2009 19:40 (sixteen years ago)

waaaht. that whole bear-story scene, he kills it. i think they're all really good tbh.

xpost

FREE DOM AND ETHAN (special guest stars mark bronson), Monday, 22 June 2009 19:40 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, Vincent Kartheiser portrays a black hole of narcissism perfectly. Pete's by turns utterly loathsome and naive in an oddly sweet way.

chap, Monday, 22 June 2009 19:45 (sixteen years ago)

three weeks pass...

Season 2 blu-ray shipped Monday to me, should arrive today. Why did I make other plans for tonight yesterday?

Jaq, Wednesday, 15 July 2009 22:15 (sixteen years ago)

http://images.nymag.com/images/2/daily/2009/07/20090715_madmen_250x363.jpg

just sayin, Thursday, 16 July 2009 08:08 (sixteen years ago)

Rewatching w/my girlfriend who's only seen Season 1 in full. The nuances become both cleverer and more glaringly obvious the second time around, but I still love the shit out of it.

Matos W.K., Thursday, 16 July 2009 08:12 (sixteen years ago)

i havent rewatched it since it was first on, might do that before season 3 starts.

just sayin, Thursday, 16 July 2009 08:22 (sixteen years ago)

Thinking baout doing this too

tehresa, Thursday, 16 July 2009 08:39 (sixteen years ago)

A Draperathon would be fun, if I have the time.

Detroit Metal City (Nicole), Thursday, 16 July 2009 12:36 (sixteen years ago)

ummm... mad men inspired furniture?

tehresa, Thursday, 16 July 2009 20:06 (sixteen years ago)

about to start season 2 via netflix. i wonder if my girlfriend would be into it without having watched season 1?

Ømår Littel (Jordan), Thursday, 16 July 2009 20:11 (sixteen years ago)

We watched the first two episodes of this and were kind of agog at the casual sexism, racism and smoking. My main comment was "I have never been as glad to live in this era as I am right now, while watching this show, except for maybe when we watched 'Roots' and 'Amistad'".

suddenly, everything was dark and smelly (HI DERE), Thursday, 16 July 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)

casual smoking vs formal smoking

Ømår Littel (Jordan), Thursday, 16 July 2009 20:14 (sixteen years ago)

Season 2 getting re-run on Comcast next week hurray

Bizarro Morbius (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 16 July 2009 20:16 (sixteen years ago)

I'm about due for a re-watch of that, I think.

fields of salmon, Friday, 17 July 2009 02:25 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.amctv.com/videos/mad-men/?bcpid=8803972001&bclid=29489833001&bctid=28623423001

Promotional bumf with a few interesting snippets from Weiner which has served its purpose in getting me very excited about S3. Kinsey appears to be exactly the same in real life.

chap, Saturday, 18 July 2009 19:04 (sixteen years ago)

Just been reading the beginning of this thread. Quite a lukewarm response from the Americans at first!

chap, Saturday, 18 July 2009 19:59 (sixteen years ago)

The Mad Men Twitter feeds aren't very good I don't think, but I quite like this: http://whatwoulddondraperdo.tumblr.com/

DavidM, Sunday, 19 July 2009 15:03 (sixteen years ago)

Is that official? It's very authentically written.

chap, Sunday, 19 July 2009 15:27 (sixteen years ago)

That shocking moments thing is very entertaining, if not exactly what I'd pick (No Betty telling Don not to come home, for example?). I was very annoyed to have to watch the same ad 10 times - at least use 3 or 4 different ones, people.

Jouster, Monday, 20 July 2009 06:49 (sixteen years ago)

halfway through Season 2 - seems to be getting better and better. I have a minor question (that may get resolved later, I dunno, or maybe I missed something)... but who does Don send the Frank O'Hara book to...? Kind of a big deal is made of him reading it and then placing it in the mail with a note, but I don't think we ever see who he was sending it to...? I'm guessing Jimmy Barrett's wife.

also is Jimmy Barrett based on Groucho Marx or what (I guess he's a bit younger than Groucho was in the early 60s but still...)

girlish in the worst sense of that term (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 24 July 2009 16:19 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah you find out, IIRC.

Desmond Decca Aitkenhead (Matt DC), Friday, 24 July 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)

the whole deal w/ the book is part of a fairly major plot point that comes up at the end of the season

max, Friday, 24 July 2009 16:21 (sixteen years ago)

don't think I've ever seen a show that uses flashbacks in such a weird, incongruous way.

girlish in the worst sense of that term (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 24 July 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)

I mean they work really well and are ingeniously weaved into the themes of the episode and overall character arcs, but they are never introduced or cut to in the conventional "I am staring out the window and remembering...." way, they don't telegraph them or frame them in the standard TV show way.

girlish in the worst sense of that term (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 24 July 2009 16:24 (sixteen years ago)

halfway through Season 2

Same here, and loving it. I thought Barrett was more a Don Rickles sort.

Jaq, Friday, 24 July 2009 16:47 (sixteen years ago)

could be - but the TV show thing sounded like a spin on What's My Line (dunno if Rickles ever got a show...?)

girlish in the worst sense of that term (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 24 July 2009 16:54 (sixteen years ago)

Rickles had a variety show in the late '60s - I'm just thinking he's much much more of a direct insult comic than Marx.

Jaq, Friday, 24 July 2009 17:06 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, Barrett's definitely based on Rickles.

Matos W.K., Saturday, 25 July 2009 05:24 (sixteen years ago)

But he looks like Jerry Lewis, just so as to not make it so obvious.

never name anything coolpix (kenan), Saturday, 25 July 2009 05:28 (sixteen years ago)

Watched the last 5 episodes of season 2 over the weekend b/c I just couldn't stop even though the plan was to stretch it out until season 3 started. So many things explained, so many ends left dangling.

Jaq, Monday, 27 July 2009 15:35 (sixteen years ago)

Mad Men yourself!
http://www.amctv.com/originals/madmen/madmenyourself/

Number None, Monday, 27 July 2009 18:32 (sixteen years ago)

Just started watching, about to pick up the next couple episodes of season 1. this show is great! the thing is, it seems strangely familiar. I really think my hometown didn't grow out of the 50's until the late 80's and even then, not completely.

daria, actually (daria-g), Monday, 27 July 2009 22:06 (sixteen years ago)

ha, I can't load it here: if I use "Mad Men Yourself" to make a black avatar, will it automatically put me in an elevator-operator uniform?

nabisco, Monday, 27 July 2009 22:37 (sixteen years ago)

You have a choice between that and Kinsey's squeeze.

chap, Monday, 27 July 2009 22:46 (sixteen years ago)

http://img504.imageshack.us/img504/4932/madmenfullbodyu.th.jpg

way cool

daria, actually (daria-g), Monday, 27 July 2009 22:50 (sixteen years ago)

http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f223/joegood/madmen_fullbody.jpg

chap, Monday, 27 July 2009 23:01 (sixteen years ago)

http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s236/mezxspectrum/madmenme.jpg

My hair is actually shorter than this now, but they didn't have another style that looked right.

DavidM, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 05:29 (sixteen years ago)

So basically I look kind of like Paul Kinsey:
http://i32.tinypic.com/2yply55.jpg

joygoat, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 06:00 (sixteen years ago)

i made one, but i ended up looking like a fat version of kenan

EVERYWHERE YOU LOOK THERE'S SOME DIFFERENT SHIT POPPIN OFF (latebloomer), Tuesday, 28 July 2009 06:04 (sixteen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v216/sexymollusk/madmen_standard.jpg

EVERYWHERE YOU LOOK THERE'S SOME DIFFERENT SHIT POPPIN OFF (latebloomer), Tuesday, 28 July 2009 06:04 (sixteen years ago)

http://photos-g.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs142.snc1/5248_1178973509251_1075536484_30562846_7467651_n.jpg

l0u1s j4gger is a "redcoat" (The Reverend), Tuesday, 28 July 2009 06:19 (sixteen years ago)

http://i671.photobucket.com/albums/vv74/snowballing/madmen_fullbody.jpg
It's mostly the cigarette that looks like me.

J4mi3 H4rl3y (Snowballing), Tuesday, 28 July 2009 07:15 (sixteen years ago)

http://i30.tinypic.com/zv1naq.jpg

Melissa W, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 07:46 (sixteen years ago)

http://i25.tinypic.com/153mtdd.jpg

Gigolo Grasiento (baaderonixx), Tuesday, 28 July 2009 07:54 (sixteen years ago)

http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y6/akadaver/madmen_fullbody.jpg

I wonder if the artist who made these was involved:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/nobodyssweetheart/collections/72157607299730493/

Millsner, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 09:46 (sixteen years ago)

I wonder if the artist who made these was involved

Yes, it was created by Dyna Moe http://www.nobodyssweetheart.com/.

DavidM, Tuesday, 28 July 2009 11:29 (sixteen years ago)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3429/3768375522_5730e32dee.jpg

Had to fiddle a bit with the result to make it look like me--none of the predesigned heads are scruffy enough!

When two tribes go to war, he always gets picked last (James Morrison), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 05:59 (sixteen years ago)

http://photos-c-1.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs195.snc1/6576_807680300049_800421_47037298_1762938_n.jpg

super-swishy

john q. lazzarus (donna rouge), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 06:10 (sixteen years ago)

http://photos-h.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs170.snc1/6380_111340622357_513642357_2383639_497876_n.jpg

sir-mounter (Eric H.), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 06:13 (sixteen years ago)

ha, we hit up the same bar

sir-mounter (Eric H.), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 06:13 (sixteen years ago)

It's a good thread to see who is smoking, who is drinking, and who's doing both.

J4mi3 H4rl3y (Snowballing), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 06:23 (sixteen years ago)

I'm hoping for a business trip to London this season. Maybe beyond the budget though.

chap, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 14:31 (sixteen years ago)

http://i612.photobucket.com/albums/tt203/pplains/madmen_fullbody.jpg

http://tinyurl.com/bbsshh (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 14:46 (sixteen years ago)

http://i32.tinypic.com/309hruh.jpg

max, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 15:06 (sixteen years ago)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3499/3769373378_d9e8306f58.jpg

hair a little inaccurate

thomp, Wednesday, 29 July 2009 15:17 (sixteen years ago)

http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/3391/madmenfullbodya.jpg

Doesn't resemble me in the slightest but it was fun to mess around with.

master of karate and friendship for everyone (musically), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 18:10 (sixteen years ago)

i didn't know this was sponsored by 8 O'Clock coffee. i drink the 8 o'clock columbian all the time, actually. it's pretty good. (the original blend in the red bag, not so much.)

daria, actually (daria-g), Wednesday, 29 July 2009 22:41 (sixteen years ago)

what about mortenson?

mizzell, Thursday, 30 July 2009 00:13 (sixteen years ago)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3494/3787163637_a37bcea462.jpg

Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 4 August 2009 05:28 (sixteen years ago)

fun facts discovered while fucking around on the mad men imdb entry:

peggy is marrying fred armisen

roger and mona are married in real life

freddy rumsen is played by joel murray, bill murray's brother

google image searching peyton list is mildly disturbing

jerk store (hmmmm), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 08:34 (sixteen years ago)

this starts back up pretty soon doesn't it? excited!

latebloomer, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 08:36 (sixteen years ago)

11 days.

Jouster, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 09:06 (sixteen years ago)

Hubba hubba

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 14:04 (sixteen years ago)

just finishing season 1...love this, so cathartic and depressing at the same time, something about watching this after a hard day's work just blows my mind. definitely agree with whoever said about the lynch thing, that bit with draper's wife shooting at the birds....so lynchian.

also this is serving as a brilliant introduction to the music for me. some amazing stuff in it, the vic damone track from s1.

yes I love this show.

I for one welcome this new Nazi ILX (Local Garda), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 20:03 (sixteen years ago)

http://ronanfitzgerald.net/random%20stuff/madmen_standard.jpg

couldn't make my beard darker than my hair...

I for one welcome this new Nazi ILX (Local Garda), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 20:17 (sixteen years ago)

Season 2 marathon all day tomorrow!

handmaid of the demon bean (Jaq), Sunday, 9 August 2009 18:39 (sixteen years ago)

just started watching season two - there's kind of a change in tone. more scenes per minute. dialogue is more beat-beat-beat-beat. i don't think there's a scene over a minute in the first twenty.

don't know if this is just the sign of a worked-over pilot or not, though.

thomp, Sunday, 9 August 2009 19:18 (sixteen years ago)

I'm gonna be out of town during the season 3 opener :(

New display name coming soon (Myonga Vön Bontee), Monday, 10 August 2009 16:23 (sixteen years ago)

I haven't been that excited by a show's new season since Bobby got hit by a car.

J4mi3 H4rl3y (Snowballing), Monday, 10 August 2009 16:24 (sixteen years ago)

series two is definitely NEXT LEVEL

thomp, Monday, 10 August 2009 23:34 (sixteen years ago)

"has anyone tried to save this yet? besides leopold and loeb over here?"

thomp, Monday, 10 August 2009 23:35 (sixteen years ago)

^Bets is being a right sourpuss there.

DavidM, Tuesday, 11 August 2009 16:39 (sixteen years ago)

hmmm no Duck in that picture

Obama Death Panel (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 18:24 (sixteen years ago)

one person in that promo photo is not dressed quite how her character dresses

nabisco, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 18:25 (sixteen years ago)

I just presumed he was gone.

it's like i have a couple worked up orc dicks under my arms (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 18:26 (sixteen years ago)

one person in that promo photo is not dressed quite how her character dresses

― nabisco, Wednesday, August 12, 2009 2:25 PM (25 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

sexy peggy 2 years l8r

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 18:52 (sixteen years ago)

Is that the gap btw? 2 years? Or is it just starting after the end of the previous season?

it's like i have a couple worked up orc dicks under my arms (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 18:55 (sixteen years ago)

I've been assuming it will start like season 2 - about a year after the end of the previous season.

Jaq, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 18:58 (sixteen years ago)

i think they've confirmed, somewhere, that they're doing it. can't remember where, though.

i am almost finished s2 - i think one of the impressive things is the cumulative effect of all the change-in-values stuff - in the first season don sees someone give someone else's kid a smack and it's "lol ppl used to think hitting kids was ok!" and then later betty thinks he ought to hit theirs, and it's "ppl used to think hitting kids was ok er lol i guess er" and then when you see betty drag sally into the closet it's pretty much just "er"

thomp, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:09 (sixteen years ago)

S1 ended in November(?) 1960. S2 was February-October 1962. So probably early 1964? It'd be nice not to have to do a big JFK episode, but still be able to see all of the loss-of-innocence aftermath, which I'm sure Weiner's more interested in, anyway.

jaymc, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:09 (sixteen years ago)

Hmmm, early 1964 = Beatles on Ed Sullivan.

jaymc, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:11 (sixteen years ago)

Some time has passed since the Cuban Missile Crisis at the end of season two -- "Mad Men" creator Matthew Weiner has asked the press not to reveal how much time, and I'll play along, save to say that you'll figure it out within the first five minutes

http://www.nj.com/entertainment/tv/index.ssf/2009/08/mad_men_season_three_review_se.html

just sayin, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:22 (sixteen years ago)

save to say that you'll figure it out within the first five minutes

Jon Hamm is wearing a hippy wig?

Alba, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:26 (sixteen years ago)

SUNDAY!!!!

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)

dmr said on another thread that he's already seen it!

just sayin, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:32 (sixteen years ago)

what a jerk

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:32 (sixteen years ago)

jealous!

sunday is soon, though!
(but i will have to wait til monday lol no tv)

tehresa, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:34 (sixteen years ago)

does it look like they made our beloved hendricks lose weight in that photo??

tehresa, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:34 (sixteen years ago)

Sterling Cooper becomes Sterling Cooper Saatchi Draft, a division of Omnimedia Corp International.

dan selzer, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:43 (sixteen years ago)

better yet...

STERCO/PARTNERS

dan selzer, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:43 (sixteen years ago)

sorry, I worked in advertising for too long. I once freelanced at a place called Euro RSCG Life Blue Star. You're gonna trust those people with your branding and marketing?

dan selzer, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:46 (sixteen years ago)

looool

tehresa, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:47 (sixteen years ago)

i kind of can't wait to see what this show does with lyndon johnson

thomp, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)

HA HAhHAhaaa

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)

@ dan

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:56 (sixteen years ago)

sorry, I worked in advertising for too long. I once freelanced at a place called Euro RSCG Life Blue Star. You're gonna trust those people with your branding and marketing?

― dan selzer, Wednesday, August 12, 2009 3:46 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Weird! I was just going to mention that I worked for one day at a firm called Messner Vetere Berger McNamee Schmetterer, and then I just saw that they had some sort of West Coast collaboration with Euro RSCG Life Blue Star.

mizzell, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 19:59 (sixteen years ago)

does it look like they made our beloved hendricks lose weight in that photo??

Looks the same to me. But if she has lost any, it was her own idea. I love that Weiner is casting women with real shapes to play these roles, and goes out of his way to do so.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 20:04 (sixteen years ago)

I think it's partly the dress and partly a perspective trick with the photo. Proportionally she doesn't look much different to me.

it's like i have a couple worked up orc dicks under my arms (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 20:06 (sixteen years ago)

Looks the same to me. But if she has lost any, it was her own idea. I love that Weiner is casting women with real shapes to play these roles, and goes out of his way to do so.

beyond that, I heard that he told them women not to work out, or at least not to do the kind of working out that would make them look like women didn't look at the time. Pretty weird and maybe unreasonable request?

dan selzer, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 20:10 (sixteen years ago)

I don't think it's a fetish or anything, but his dedication to perfecting the world of 1960/1962/1964? for his show is admirable.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 20:17 (sixteen years ago)

thats pretty weird but at the same time u hav to admire the attention to detail

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 20:21 (sixteen years ago)

But then again...

The fonts aren't perfect

Alba, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 20:26 (sixteen years ago)

He forgot to mention the choice of Arial for the closing credits.

thomp, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 20:37 (sixteen years ago)

that is some epic anal retentiveness there and i am humbled!

xpost

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 20:38 (sixteen years ago)

i am actually genuinely impressed

thomp, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 20:39 (sixteen years ago)

Hendricks doesn't look as if she's dropped a dress size here. Not to me at least.

http://photos-d-3.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs129.snc1/5533_253728620326_140731500326_8373379_4984535_n.jpg

DavidM, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 20:52 (sixteen years ago)

http://photos-c-3.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs129.snc1/5533_253745625326_140731500326_8373970_8239607_n.jpg

^my current screensaver.

DavidM, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)

She is magnificent.

chap, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 20:54 (sixteen years ago)

Is Pete going to be more prominent this season? He seems integral to a bunch of the pre-season press photos.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 20:57 (sixteen years ago)

I think Pete has been pretty prominent in the first 2 seasons.

mizzell, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 20:58 (sixteen years ago)

I wouldn't say Pete has lacked prominence so far! He was essentially the antagonist of S1.

xpost

chap, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 20:58 (sixteen years ago)

1st season: equal parts office life and home life.
2nd season: mostly home life.

That said, he seemed at the beginning to be a pivotal character, but now he's just around for narrative color.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 20:59 (sixteen years ago)

One more.

http://photos-d-3.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs149.snc1/5533_253757455326_140731500326_8374107_5823770_n.jpg

I won't even be seeing this new season 'till early next year.

DavidM, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:01 (sixteen years ago)

His professional arc came on quite a lot in S2, what with learning a bit of restraint and genuinely earning his place at the Sterling-Cooper table and (perhaps) the grudging respect of Don. In his personal life he just devolved into complete and utter cunthood.

xpost

chap, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:02 (sixteen years ago)

Tivo'd the entire second season; suppose I should get s1 first before trying this out.
Been avoiding saying this anywhere cuz of horndog 77 ws kids, but my girl basically has the same measurements as Hendricks; her interest in the show has mostly been about copping some of the fashion.

"I'm smiling. Because that's what i do. I'm always smiling." (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:06 (sixteen years ago)

blondie by far the weakest character on this show. not even sure why he's in it tbh

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:06 (sixteen years ago)

I felt a lot more sympathy for Pete in s2. You learned about his awful mother, for a start. And he can be sweet with Peggy.

Alba, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:07 (sixteen years ago)

ok i just finished watching season 2

i have kind of crazy sympathy for pete: he does seem kind of one step away, at least, from buying totally into 'what i really want is to be part of the grown-up rich club' — the interest in his character is wanting him to find a way to escape that, and the sad part is that he's never gonna i guess? — i like his conversation with his father-in-law viz. "look, you have to know you can't be good at business if your wife's unhappy" "yes, and they seem very directly correlated here", and the quite spectacular loyalty he shows to don in the last episodes, and in episode 12 he actually follows peggy's advice, you know. progress.

i did like betty's neighbour on hearing she's pregnant: "congratulations?"

thomp, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:11 (sixteen years ago)

the thing is, they now have to be very clever with season three to avoid retreads or soap or both: the first two seasons both rely on the drapers' marriage drifting slowly towards crisis, and i don't really wanna watch that again

i'd like if the big surprise in ep 1 was that betty says something that indicates she knows don draper isn't actually don draper.

thomp, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:14 (sixteen years ago)

I agree with your take on Pete. You put it very well.

Alba, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:15 (sixteen years ago)

has anyone else noted how closely Don/Betty's relationship and storyline mirrors Tony/Carmela's

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:28 (sixteen years ago)

I never watched The Sopranos much (not having HBO was a big impediment).

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:30 (sixteen years ago)

Betty/Carmela are both housewives married to amoral, unfaithful men. Both are entirely dependent on their husbands for both their emotional and physical wellbeing. Both are aware of this and feel at once priveleged and constrained by their situation and can't find a way out of it (including flirting and entertaining infidelities of their own).

Tony/Don are conflicted about their behavior - they want to be good upstanding husbands and good examples to their kids, but are also slaves to their own habits, which are reinforced by the businesses they operate in. Drinking and whoring are integral parts of their respective businesses. Both are confronted by their wives about their infidelities, which they explicitly deny but kind of implicitly acknowledge. Both desert their families for trips to get away and "find" themselves in the company of mysteriously attractive strangers (Don goes to California, Tony goes to Italy, Vegas, etc.) Both know they are inexplicably bound to their wives, no matter what happens.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:38 (sixteen years ago)

Yet Don doesn't surprise Betty/buy her temporary forgiveness with some expensive bauble every other week

New display name coming soon (Myonga Vön Bontee), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:41 (sixteen years ago)

Nice analysis Shakey! I don't know if Don is as 'inexplicably bound' to Betty as all that though, Betty just happens to be integral to the role Don is playing at the moment - one which is perhaps felt more deeply than those he has played in the past, but it remains to be seen how long he will stick to it. He is far more a creature of choice than Tony Soprano ever was. On the other hand, I do think Don is more redeemable than Tony, if only because he operates in less murky moral waters on a day-to-day basis. Not that those waters are free of murk by any means...

xpost

chap, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:46 (sixteen years ago)

yeah, there's differences. Don is not anywhere near the monster Tony is, for example. He does seem to have some kind of moral core (note how he objected to profiting off the airline crash, and he doesn't seem as openly racist/classist as many of his colleagues), which Tony definitely does not. On the other hand, a lot of Don's outwardly more progressive actions - boosting Peggy, the airline thing, smoking dope with beatniks, etc. - also have their self-serving aspects... I do think that Don needs Betty the same way Tony needs Carmela: they are important accessories, crucial to the image they need to maintain and project to the world at large. Having a hot wife taking care of your kids is part of some ideal that they both acknowledge and aggressively pursue. Although yeah, Don's not Italian, so the Catholic-mother thing doesn't really figure (his own situation of not having a mother plays into this too, of course)

But the overall character arcs, the way the relationships have played out, are very similar.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:51 (sixteen years ago)

blondie by far the weakest character on this show. not even sure why he's in it tbh

Because the office is full of WASPs and he's the golden-boy uber-WASP who gets ahead for no apparent reason and it drives the other characters in the office nuts.

Matos W.K., Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:51 (sixteen years ago)

another key difference between Don and Tony is that we get the sense that Don has some kind of deeply held idealism, a kind of dreamy artistic temperament that comes through in his ad campaigns - and oddly its that component that makes him so successful at what he does. (Tony's success, by contrast, is predicated purely on his brutality).

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:53 (sixteen years ago)

x-post

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:53 (sixteen years ago)

he's as much a symbol of the old order as Don in that way (xpost)

Matos W.K., Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:54 (sixteen years ago)

I'll have to think about this more deeply, but I reckon Tony has a deeper genuine emotional attachment to Camella (and his kids) than Don has to Betty. Tony may be less ethical, but he is far more sentimental.

xpost - By Blondie do we mean Cosgrove?

chap, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:55 (sixteen years ago)

I presume Cosgrove, yes.

Matos W.K., Wednesday, 12 August 2009 21:58 (sixteen years ago)

yeah sorry - he's so forgettable I forgot his name

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 22:05 (sixteen years ago)

He has some of the best lines on the show, though! Who else could have thrown away "Kurt's a homo" like that?

Matos W.K., Wednesday, 12 August 2009 22:06 (sixteen years ago)

I can't remember half the Junior ad execs' names. There's Blondie and Four Eyes and dude who looks like Orson Welles and the gay one. That's what I call them.

it's like i have a couple worked up orc dicks under my arms (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 22:08 (sixteen years ago)

I guess I remember the gay one's name now that I think about it. It's Sal, right?

it's like i have a couple worked up orc dicks under my arms (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 22:08 (sixteen years ago)

Watching the Mad Men marathon the other day made me realize I kind of love Pete. I feel a lot of sympathy for him, strangely enough.

Detroit Metal City (Nicole), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 22:09 (sixteen years ago)

I think that Second Season Pete is a far more sympathetic animal than First Season Pete.

it's like i have a couple worked up orc dicks under my arms (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 22:10 (sixteen years ago)

I still liked First Season Pete more though. Just fascinating to watch.

it's like i have a couple worked up orc dicks under my arms (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 22:10 (sixteen years ago)

I was finally able to forget he was Connor on Angel by Season Two.

Detroit Metal City (Nicole), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 22:13 (sixteen years ago)

... i wish i hadn't just had that pointed out to me.

thomp, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 22:15 (sixteen years ago)

oyy.

http://www.phase9.tv/images4a/Angel_Season_5_-_2_Angel__Connor.JPG

thomp, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 22:16 (sixteen years ago)

It took me a while to place him as the guy from Another Day in Paradise actually.

it's like i have a couple worked up orc dicks under my arms (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 12 August 2009 22:22 (sixteen years ago)

lol lucky me. I never watched Angel. And I never saw Christina Hendricks in Firefly either. But I still think of Peggy as Zoey Bartlett.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 22:52 (sixteen years ago)

i really like elisabeth moss in this, found her quite annoying as zoeeeyy — but i think that's probably because peggy's written both as a character interesting in her own right and as a character which allows the actor to do all kinds of interesting things

thomp, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 23:14 (sixteen years ago)

like, one of my favorite bits of s1 is the way she buys a sandwich in that one bit where she buys a sandwich

thomp, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 23:16 (sixteen years ago)

I'll get around to watching S1 again sometime in the future (it's been over a year since I've seen any of it). As for S2, though, I loved the episode when Barbie Barrett was convalescing in Peggy's apartment. The way she was interacting was so cold and mysterious, I couldn't get any handle on what her motivations were.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 23:19 (sixteen years ago)

Barbie = Bobbie, obvs.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 12 August 2009 23:20 (sixteen years ago)

Regarding Cosgrove's blandness—

The writers must be in on the joke. I recall a scene in S2 where he's attempting to charm Don's new secretary, only to be rebuffed "wait, who are you again?"

He stands there, incredulous, "I'm Cosgrove."

Millsner, Thursday, 13 August 2009 03:21 (sixteen years ago)

he was published in the atlantic monthly you dicks!

mizzell, Thursday, 13 August 2009 03:43 (sixteen years ago)

i really wish jason bateman was some copywriter or creative guy at the agency just so that in that episode he could say, "him?????"

tehresa, Thursday, 13 August 2009 03:46 (sixteen years ago)

sis interesting:
http://www.feministing.com/archives/017181.html

the heart is a lonely hamster (schlump), Thursday, 13 August 2009 18:35 (sixteen years ago)

I like how Sterling always looks embalmed

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 13 August 2009 18:45 (sixteen years ago)

I wish I could afford to dress like I was a character in Mad Men.

fruity gonzalo (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 13 August 2009 18:46 (sixteen years ago)

I really hope the new season returns me to a point of actually enjoying watching this show. For most of season two I didn't.

nabisco, Thursday, 13 August 2009 18:46 (sixteen years ago)

(That's not to say I hated it or necessarily thought of it all as "bad," I just didn't get a lot of raw enjoyment out of following it.)

nabisco, Thursday, 13 August 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

the "Don goes to LA" thing seemed unnecessarily padded - can't say I got into the thing with the freeloader guy pimping out his daughter and Don walking into the ocean and all that.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 13 August 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)

another similarity between Tony/Don - monstrous parents/parental figures that totally warped them

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 13 August 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)

Ah, fuck it...

http://photos-d-3.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc1/hs129.snc1/5533_253749990326_140731500326_8374027_5628842_n.jpg

I'm outta here!

DavidM, Thursday, 13 August 2009 18:52 (sixteen years ago)

most heartbreaking/emotionally engaging moments in Season 2 for me were: Joan getting raped (or date-raped, whatever you wanna call it) and Jimmy Barrett telling Don he's a piece of shit

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 13 August 2009 18:57 (sixteen years ago)

can't say I got into the thing with the freeloader guy pimping out his daughter and Don walking into the ocean and all that.

this is my favorite episode! actually found it quite moving in an oblique way regarding Don's sort of "man without qualities" thing he's got going on.

Peggy telling Pete about the baby was pretty wrenching for me.

ryan, Thursday, 13 August 2009 19:02 (sixteen years ago)

Jimmy Barrett telling Don he's a piece of shit

^^^THIS! That was such a raw and gratifying scene.

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 13 August 2009 19:42 (sixteen years ago)

it's becoming clear from reading this that i remember nothing from season 2. must rewatch! fast!

tehresa, Thursday, 13 August 2009 21:21 (sixteen years ago)

Betty's (calculated?) puking in Don's new perfect car was so great. But yeah, the whole Jimmie Barrett/Don/Bobbie business was full of whoa! moments: Peggy showing up to bail them out, Don grabbing (or uhm, whatever you'd call that) Bobbie in the restaurant to force her co-operation, Betty's slowly dawning realization of what Jimmie was going on about at the party. But I really wanted to smack Don when he cut Bets about her new bikini, telling her she looked desparate.

Jaq, Thursday, 13 August 2009 21:30 (sixteen years ago)

FWIW, I don't think Betty's puking was calculated at all.

chap, Thursday, 13 August 2009 22:02 (sixteen years ago)

I didn't make that connection myself but it seems plausible. would have to re-watch

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 13 August 2009 22:05 (sixteen years ago)

There was something in the look on her face, and that she didn't try to go for the door/window or tell him to stop.

Jaq, Thursday, 13 August 2009 22:09 (sixteen years ago)

i think it was more like she wanted to say something to Don but threw up instead.

Roz, Friday, 14 August 2009 12:33 (sixteen years ago)

some(very slight)spoilers in today's nytimes review.

mizzell, Friday, 14 August 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)

was the best man at a wedding sunday and went with a mad men style look. just saw the pics and i think i pulled it off great! normally i have sort of messy shaggy hair and a beard. i sort of think it would be awesome to do that every day too!

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Friday, 14 August 2009 20:51 (sixteen years ago)

is it me or have they slightly modernised the outfitting in some of those promo shots? status of buttons, cuffs, etc.; half the cast have pretty much their entire cuffs showing half the time, in the show

thomp, Friday, 14 August 2009 21:15 (sixteen years ago)

3 HOURS! I'm dying!

Johnny Fever, Sunday, 16 August 2009 22:35 (sixteen years ago)

I think I will give this another shot tonight. Has Robert Morse been on semiregularly? That's pretty cute referential casting, considering what he was doing on Broadway in 1962.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Succeed_in_Business_Without_Really_Trying

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 August 2009 01:20 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, he's on every 2-3 shows. I keep wanting him to break into "A Secretary is not a Toy" :)

Jaq, Monday, 17 August 2009 01:22 (sixteen years ago)

Has Robert Morse been on semiregularly?

more than semiregularly

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Monday, 17 August 2009 03:05 (sixteen years ago)

good episode. maybe we'll get another pete meltdown

http://i587.photobucket.com/albums/ss313/tempering/GIFS/2jgq2u.gif

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Monday, 17 August 2009 03:52 (sixteen years ago)

The look on Sal's face when he saw Don in the window was perfect...not surprised, just resigned.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 August 2009 03:55 (sixteen years ago)

Also, as usual, Jared Harris = A++++++++++++

Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 August 2009 03:58 (sixteen years ago)

pocket pen explosion was hilarious

dmr, Monday, 17 August 2009 05:10 (sixteen years ago)

i am so used to jared harris' incredibly creepy character on fringe that i automatically do not trust him on mad men!

tehresa, Monday, 17 August 2009 06:47 (sixteen years ago)

good episode. not too much reveal, but just enough.

sally draper (get bent), Monday, 17 August 2009 06:59 (sixteen years ago)

what's the deal with the stick pin that sally puts on? did it belong to the stewardess?

sally draper (get bent), Monday, 17 August 2009 07:01 (sixteen years ago)

Pretty sure it was the stewardess's wings.

Jaq, Monday, 17 August 2009 07:03 (sixteen years ago)

good episode. not too much reveal, but just enough.

it limited its exposure, yuk yuk.

sally draper (get bent), Monday, 17 August 2009 07:18 (sixteen years ago)

haw!

tehresa, Monday, 17 August 2009 07:30 (sixteen years ago)

so draper was named after a penis, how fucked up AND appropriate is that?

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Monday, 17 August 2009 09:16 (sixteen years ago)

Huge fan of the show, not a huge fan of the premiere. Bring on episode 2 regardless!

Jouster, Monday, 17 August 2009 09:47 (sixteen years ago)

This show is obviously well produced and most of the actors are very good. As with the one I saw previously, this episode did nothing for me. Screw these guys and their problems. (I also saw way too many Petes in the two scumbag agencies I worked for. Wanted to take a baseball bat to their heads every day.)

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 August 2009 12:53 (sixteen years ago)

what happened to Duck?

loving the Brits ("This place is a gynochracy!" "I hadn't noticed")

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 15:30 (sixteen years ago)

duck tried to screw don and got ownd

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:53 (sixteen years ago)

banging the random stewardess doent seem like don - hes always been more selective up until now - wonder if this portends a coming freakout

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:55 (sixteen years ago)

haha i loved cosgrove this episode

max, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:56 (sixteen years ago)

ken, peggy, TV guy are just about the only all-around likeable characters in the series

max, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:56 (sixteen years ago)

yeah lol at kens not giving a fuck attitude kills pete

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:57 (sixteen years ago)

I would've included Sal in that list, but then I remembered he was a dick to his sham wife when Ken came over for dinner.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:58 (sixteen years ago)

and kens reaction to the news vs petes!

max, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:58 (sixteen years ago)

duck tried to screw don and got ownd

see but this only sorta implied in the final episode of Season 2 (unless I'm missing something....?) Duck flies off the handle at the meeting announcing the buyout, but then the Brit owners confirm that "this doesn't change anything"... so why is Duck not President (and Pete not head of accounts) at the beginning of this season?

x-posts

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 15:58 (sixteen years ago)

nah shakes--at the meeting duck gets all uppity and announces that don is going to be his bitch--then don is like, nope, and duck is all, LOL, guess what, u have to honor ur contract, and the dons like, DOUBLE LOL, i dont have a contract, and drunk roger sort of shrugs, and then theres a silence, and then the limeys ask duck to leave the meeting

max, Monday, 17 August 2009 15:59 (sixteen years ago)

if u look at how they left it as far as the negotiations don had all the leverage and duck had none - duck tried to screw don and was already on his bad side so it stands to reason that hed be gone

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:00 (sixteen years ago)

"why cant i ever get what i want all at once"

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:05 (sixteen years ago)

SHIFTY BRITS. Did we really talk like that in 1963?

Maybe a slightly lighter, more comic tone this series? We'll see.

chap, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:16 (sixteen years ago)

Brit owners confirm that "this doesn't change anything"...

this refered to the details of the merger, i believe.

mizzell, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:18 (sixteen years ago)

ken, peggy, TV guy are just about the only all-around likeable characters in the series

― max, Monday, August 17, 2009 11:56 AM (23 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

do you remember the election episode when ken chased, tackled, held down a girl, and lifted her skirt to find out what color panties she was wearing?

mizzell, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)

Oh forgot about that.

In place of Ken, I'd substitute Pete's wife.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:24 (sixteen years ago)

omg petes wife is the WORST

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:33 (sixteen years ago)

she has nice hats.

mizzell, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:33 (sixteen years ago)

No way. Her extreme patience is admirable, seeing as how she married a six year old.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:34 (sixteen years ago)

shes the most disingenuous clueless person in the world - and she married a sociopath

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:36 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, she's not a bad person, but anyone who puts up with Pete as a husband is by definition an idiot.

chap, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:37 (sixteen years ago)

I still think Sal is basically a nice guy - his treatment of his wife (name?) when Ken was round was out of order, but not malicious I don't think. Also despite the marriage being a sham for obvious reasons, there have been indications that he's genuinely fond of her.

chap, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:38 (sixteen years ago)

In that case, I'd nominate Betty's neighbor/friend who was Amber on House.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:39 (sixteen years ago)

am so looking forward to more cosgrove vs campbell.

hilarious first episode btw, i wasn't expecting that at all.

Roz, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:40 (sixteen years ago)

for her open-minded views on divorced women or her constant gossiping?
x-post

mizzell, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:42 (sixteen years ago)

I dunno, I kind of love her for it.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:43 (sixteen years ago)

Betty's friends are an awful bunch.

chap, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:44 (sixteen years ago)

I didn't ever like her on House until I saw her on Mad Men, which forced me to re-evaluate my position. xp

Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:44 (sixteen years ago)

this episode was weird. why spend so much time on a flashback that revealed nothing new? why introduce a second character named bert just to get rid of him?
also betty saying that sayy took to the tools like a lesbian was 0_o

mizzell, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:45 (sixteen years ago)

yalls look like a lil lesbian lol

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:47 (sixteen years ago)

Point of flashback: Don was (originally) named after a penis.

chap, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:47 (sixteen years ago)

Also, AMC wanted to shock a new influx of viewers by saying "dick" twice in the first 3 minutes of the show.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 August 2009 16:48 (sixteen years ago)

why introduce a second character named bert just to get rid of him?

I thought this guy was funny but yeah - why'd they skip Duck's firing in favor of this random guy

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 16:59 (sixteen years ago)

I suspect Duck might pop up again.

chap, Monday, 17 August 2009 17:00 (sixteen years ago)

imdb says Mark Moses was only a cast member from 2007-08, so maybe Weiner botched his sendoff and tried to make up for it by firing someone else?

Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 August 2009 17:02 (sixteen years ago)

maybe he'll show up drunk as a skunk crying about Chauncy.

mizzell, Monday, 17 August 2009 17:03 (sixteen years ago)

Huge fan of the show, not a huge fan of the premiere.

As I said on someone's facebook earlier: "They don't seem overly determined to start off the seasons with a barn-burner, and it's telling of a bit more seriousness than most shows." I think you can scroll up on this same thread to see people's "meh" reaction to the season 2 opener.

or have I become completely absurd? (kenan), Monday, 17 August 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)

Both 1 and 2 took a few episodes to get some steam behind them, yeah. This was actually quite action-packed for a Mad Men opener.

chap, Monday, 17 August 2009 17:31 (sixteen years ago)

i loved cosgrove this episode

I am loving this actor. (Aaron Staton... just looked it up.) It would be so easy to play Ken's guileless enthusiasm in this episode as a being bit clueless, but instead he reacts exactly like someone who just got a big promotion and is excited about his job. How do you not love this guy?

omg petes wife is the WORST

Worse than Pete? Please. Yeah, she's gratingly cheery, mixed with maybe a touch of Lady Macbeth, but Pete is just... well, the WORST.

Betty's friends are an awful bunch.

The fact that she's not exactly like them is what's great and admirable about Betty. It's clear that the social pressure is overwhelmingly in favor of being exactly like them.

or have I become completely absurd? (kenan), Monday, 17 August 2009 17:32 (sixteen years ago)

I think Pete's wife is, umm, almost exactly like Pete, only better at it. Still don't get the "sociopath" thing, unless we're just abandoning the word's having any meaning whatsoever.

It was probably not a good thing that I covered my eyes and burst out laughing at the "Dick" thing. Probably the first thing I've encountered in this show that just seemed ridiculous and dumb and groany and over-the-top, and they put it in the first two minutes of a new season.

banging the random stewardess doent seem like don

note to don: if brother-in-law borrows bags for any future travel, make sure he's not flying TWA

nabisco, Monday, 17 August 2009 17:45 (sixteen years ago)

I think Pete's wife is, umm, almost exactly like Pete

They seem like a good match, I'll give you that.

or have I become completely absurd? (kenan), Monday, 17 August 2009 17:46 (sixteen years ago)

Probably the first thing I've encountered in this show that just seemed ridiculous and dumb and groany and over-the-top, and they put it in the first two minutes of a new season.

yeah I agree with this. also the flashback was weird, considering it wasn't really a "flashback" (unless lol Don remembers being born, and arguments his parents had before he was born)

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 17:46 (sixteen years ago)

It was something he was thinkin' about. He knows these facts. Suspend just a little disbelief.

or have I become completely absurd? (kenan), Monday, 17 August 2009 17:49 (sixteen years ago)

Also the Dick thing was something that made me smile, but not laugh at because it was too absurd. It's a kind of a joke, yeah. Obviously.

or have I become completely absurd? (kenan), Monday, 17 August 2009 17:51 (sixteen years ago)

nabisco im tired of having this conversation w/u and making the same points over n over and then u being all the word has a meaning w/o ever showing any hint that u know what that meaning might be

Factor1: Aggressive narcissism

1. Glibness/superficial charm
2. Grandiose sense of self-worth
3. Pathological lying
4. Cunning/manipulative
5. Lack of remorse or guilt
6. Emotionally shallow
7. Callous/lack of empathy
8. Failure to accept responsibility for own actions

petes got a buttload of socipathic tenancies - maybe hed be diagnosed w/some other related disorder - but its not really a stretch as far as amateur internet diagnosis goes

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 17:53 (sixteen years ago)

Sociopathy is a loosely-defined term that may be used to refer to:

* Psychopathy
* Antisocial personality disorder
* Dissocial personality disorder

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 17:55 (sixteen years ago)

Haha dude we had the conversation a year ago, have you been sick of it this whole time? I still just think it's a weird and irksome use of the term. (Also I don't know which of a billion breakdowns of related terms you're quoting factors from, but if you really want to make a DSM diagnosis we should probably decide whether to use the period-appropriate DSM-I or the current one.)

nabisco, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:01 (sixteen years ago)

xpost - ha, okay, now you're looking at Wikipedia. the only traits he really shares there are dissocial (he'd be the opposite of antisocial), but honestly the reason the term bugs me is that personality disorders are really substantially different from just character traits -- otherwise we could pretty much all internet-diagnose ourselves as being severely disordered, you know? I just find it a bit strong for a functional character who's mostly petulant and childish and repressed in situation-appropriate ways.

nabisco, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:07 (sixteen years ago)

i don't think pete's wife is clueless. she knows what she wants and she married him because she thought he could get there there, and she puts up with his shit because she's just as shallow and hopes it will someday pay off with her own spot on the docents committee, kids in the best school, etc. she is an idiot, yes, but she has a certain motivation.

tehresa, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:10 (sixteen years ago)

yes ive been sitting at home for the last year just sick to death of this conversation - and no we i dont really want to make era appropriate dsm diagnosis - i just want to label this glib callow obv something not quite right tv character with the wides accepted as vague term sociopath w/u playing willfully pedantic amateur psychologist

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:12 (sixteen years ago)

and i completely stand by my diagnosis and wiki c&p and more importantly that there is something seriously wrong w/pete beyond just normal personality traits

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)

dude, we don't have to agree on this, but it's not pedantic or amateur psychology for me to have an opinion too

nabisco, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:17 (sixteen years ago)

it is - im sorry ive diagnosed u w/a bad case of pedantic amateur psychology - plz make an appointment to discus treatment options

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:19 (sixteen years ago)

that was a joke about the DSM-I, btw, which I think is funny, cuz I think the DSM-I would identify Salvatore as the most mentally ill person in the building

xpost - don't worry, I'm already engaged in intensive shotput/javelin cross-treatment

nabisco, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:20 (sixteen years ago)

i think at the heart of this conversation is the question: is pete normal fucked up or special fucked up?

im voting special fucked up

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:23 (sixteen years ago)

i've never convinced he's that special fucked up but that may be because i'm a woman and women don't know anything

tehresa, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:24 (sixteen years ago)

never *been* convinced

tehresa, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:24 (sixteen years ago)

Pete's fucked upness clearly comes from growing up with those parents of his, though his brother seems more normal. So SHIT... I dunno if he's normal fucked up or special fucked up.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:26 (sixteen years ago)

his parents seem to like his brother a bit, though.

mizzell, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:35 (sixteen years ago)

I've really never gotten the sense that he's specially fucked up or disordered, just mostly petulant, entitled, and frustrated. (On a level that doesn't seem super-mysterious, to me.) And he functions and deals with people pretty normally, for the most part. (E.g. in this episode, when he goes to talk to Don and then notices Roger there.)

I do like the pairing of him and his wife as the young couple, both of them really more dealing with the role of being husband/wife than actually dealing with the other -- I think tehresa's completely OTM up there about that stuff. Like part of Pete's frustration early on was that his wife could use her father as leverage to get stuff she wanted out of their marriage, so not only was he petulant and frustrated about not being important enough at work, he was the same way about not having control at home, either.

nabisco, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:38 (sixteen years ago)

I think he's my favorite character now, I loved how he almost cried at the meeting.

Detroit Metal City (Nicole), Monday, 17 August 2009 18:41 (sixteen years ago)

his hapless fumbling with accepting the promotion from the Brit was hilarious

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 18:46 (sixteen years ago)

see, when midge threw that tv out the window she at least giggled and looked to see if she hurt someone, pete just tossed that roast chicken and never thought twice about it.

mizzell, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:46 (sixteen years ago)

what a sociopath!

tehresa, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

exactly

mizzell, Monday, 17 August 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)

I have my concerns about Sally and that hammer -- classic antisocial behavior, and tbh her remorse was unconvincing

nabisco, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:03 (sixteen years ago)

yeah sally is a messed up kid, which is unsurprising considering how betty treats her.

Roz, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:10 (sixteen years ago)

"pete just tossed that roast chicken and never thought twice about it."
i would like mad men to take a page from the Lost handbook and follow up on the fate of this roast chicken in the future.

Philip Nunez, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:12 (sixteen years ago)

Maybe it killed "Duck."

Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:14 (sixteen years ago)

(the timeline is off, I know)

Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:14 (sixteen years ago)

ha, not a problem (for Lost anyway)

re: "sally is a messed up kid, which is unsurprising considering how betty treats her."

is betty meant to be atypical this way? "put that cigarette out, you'll burn the house down" and such.

Philip Nunez, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:17 (sixteen years ago)

did you miss the episode where Betty locked her in the closet

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:26 (sixteen years ago)

wasn't it for like 20 seconds?, and my impression was this was acceptable 60s punishment in lieu of belts and such.

Philip Nunez, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)

and then gave her riding boots and the "you're a big girl now" speech.

Roz, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)

lol brits are british. lol kids are cuet. yawn

not enough peggy, not enough joan

cosgrove has been re-speech-mannerised, again; campbell spends this episode acting like a cartoon version of himself. vincent kartheiser not at his best, but this is one of the lamest 'look, he is spoilt! and feels entitled!' scripts he has been given. also, when did their marriage stop being completely failing?

did americans say 'i feel badly' in 1963? i feel this is a modern malopropism

incidental music has got lamer. also, the sound design has picked up the annoying tic of having phones and intercoms crazy buzzy. this is probably historically accurate but grr.

nice to see sal get some action, but this episode spends way too long on establishing that yes, don is still screwing around.

mb later episodes will clear up or build on some of this. hm.

thomp, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:32 (sixteen years ago)

normal fucked up or special fucked up

Ad men aren't special anything.

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:33 (sixteen years ago)

not enough peggy, not enough joan

^^^otm

didn't you guys feel like don was really apprehensive about his infidelity now, though? yeah, he's still a philandering jerk but he seems to have more of a conscience about it now, no?

tehresa, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:34 (sixteen years ago)

mainly he just didn't seem to enjoy it, but jon hamm plays him as such a blank ...

(this is i think what i was worrying about when i finished watching s2 - how do you focus a show like this on a character who has a hole where the character should be - hamm's performance is great, but there's nowhere for it to go)

thomp, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:38 (sixteen years ago)

wahtd u guys think sals sexual history is like - get the feeling hes quite inexperienced w/the gayness

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:38 (sixteen years ago)

Oh yeah totally - wouldn't be surprised if that's as far as he's got with a guy. Sounded like he was going to cream any second.

chap, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:40 (sixteen years ago)

It seemed to me like he was going out of his way to NOT cheat until she threw herself at him, at which point he fell like a sack of potatoes because he's a weak, weak man re: sex.

I hope Peggy and Lola get into it soon.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:40 (sixteen years ago)

i always got the feeling he was completely inexperienced with men - like this could have been one of his first encounters, if not THE first. he's been trying so hard to live up to the hetero married guy thing, i'm not sure if he ever actually let himself dabble in homosexual activity before.

tehresa, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:41 (sixteen years ago)

yeah lola sucks ftr!

tehresa, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:42 (sixteen years ago)

yeah sally is a messed up kid, which is unsurprising considering how betty treats her.

lol cmon shes not messed up she loves her dad wtf all kids break shit if anything the draper kids seem pretty well behaved and happy considering how self-obsessed and inconsistent don and betty are as parents

also lol if they got a new actor for the boy kid yet again

did americans say 'i feel badly' in 1963? i feel this is a modern malopropism

if u care about this shit i feel badly for u

You Only Blog When You're Winning (Lamp), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:44 (sixteen years ago)

it clunks!

thomp, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:45 (sixteen years ago)

it would probably bother me less if it hadn't shown up at the same time as the hullo-we're-british-you-see types

thomp, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:46 (sixteen years ago)

ok mirriam-webster dates the confusion in it back to 1869 apparently

screw u for making me look that up ~

thomp, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:48 (sixteen years ago)

there was some vanity fair article about how OCD the writers were about getting details right so odds are, they did say "i feel badly" and parents routinely locked their kids in closets and let them play with plastic bags.

Philip Nunez, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:50 (sixteen years ago)

I don't think anyone linked this feature from the Sunday NYT?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/arts/television/09kapl.html

John Cheever’s short stories about midcentury suburbia were a major inspiration, but not Richard Yates’s 1961 novel, “Revolutionary Road,” to which the series is often compared.

Mr. Weiner had never heard of Yates when he wrote the “Mad Men” pilot in 2000. “ ‘Revolutionary Road’ was given to me three years after I wrote the pilot,” he said. He says if he had read the book before, he wouldn’t have had the nerve to write the show: “Yates was there. This is what he was writing about.”

I heartily recommend reading RR if you only saw last winter's mediocre film adap.

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Monday, 17 August 2009 19:52 (sixteen years ago)

didn't you guys feel like don was really apprehensive about his infidelity now, though?

yes, a bit, and part of what this show does well is that it seemed like real conflict and not just a script trying to tease us with will-he/won't-he -- but part of what sometimes makes this show a drag for me is that it's increasingly hard to care a lot about the guy's fidelity. when he's cheating with someone interesting it can enliven things, and obviously this first episode needed to introduce the question of whether his behavior's changed, but other than that I think it's gone on too long to really invest in whether he gets on a stewardess or not. hopefully this season will either introduce a change on this front or else just stop paying much attention to it.

nabisco, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)

he seemed more apathetic than conflicted - tho both elements were there

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:58 (sixteen years ago)

btw loved dons zing at sals expense re predatory stewardesses

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 19:59 (sixteen years ago)

the part at the end where his daughter finds the stewardess pin was pretty funny, the "oh shit" look on his face

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:11 (sixteen years ago)

— so where do you all think the plot with don knowing about sal is going?

i. don doesn't give a shit about it
ii. don and sal in uneasy, shitty truce about it
iii. don is a shit about it

thomp, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:25 (sixteen years ago)

i vote i

ice cr?m, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:25 (sixteen years ago)

pretty sure don will be on some dont ask, dont tell shit

jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:25 (sixteen years ago)

btw loved dons zing at sals expense re predatory stewardesses

― ice cr?m, Monday, August 17, 2009 3:59 PM (22 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

this was the funniest line.

mizzell, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:26 (sixteen years ago)

pretty sure don will be on some dont ask, dont tell shit

― jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Monday, August 17, 2009 8:25 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

Think that's what he was tactfully telling Sal on the plane.

chap, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:28 (sixteen years ago)

pretty sure don will be on some dont ask, dont tell shit

lolz probably. Altho didn't he explicitly ask the young guys Duck wanted to hire (the euro-gay guy and his buddy?)

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:28 (sixteen years ago)

if the past is any guide, Don will use what he knows about Sal to get his way on something or get back at somebody at some point - just like he used Peggy against Pete.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:29 (sixteen years ago)

lolz probably. Altho didn't he explicitly ask the young guys Duck wanted to hire (the euro-gay guy and his buddy?)

― go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, August 17, 2009 4:28 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

no, he didn't.

mizzell, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:35 (sixteen years ago)

Seducing beautiful & interesting women always seemed like Don's one hobby--doesn't play golf or tennis or ride horses or anything else--so giving in to the stewardess felt like a new twist on his infidelities. It was certainly the most realistic awkward sorta desperate one night stand I can remember seeing on TV. Also as the episode's framing indicated, his philandering has a new tone in light of the imminent birth of another child.

I see Morbs' & thomps' perspectives, I think endless adultery is wearying, I'm not totally stoked for this storyline but I do think there are possibilities there.

Also @Shakey and others from waaay upthread: "He never could hold his liquor" was Duck's kiss-off line, it was concise and cruel and completed Duck's arc perfectly, why spoil it was a purely expositional firing scene?

goth casual, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:36 (sixteen years ago)

because it wasn't at all clear to idiots like me that he'd been fired?

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:39 (sixteen years ago)

I mean insofar as Duck's being president was part of the deal, following that up with "this doesn't change anything" was kinda uhh waht just happened

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:39 (sixteen years ago)

lolz probably. Altho didn't he explicitly ask the young guys Duck wanted to hire (the euro-gay guy and his buddy?)

― go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, August 17, 2009 4:28 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

no, he didn't.

when he hired them, Don said "I'm gonna ask you what they asked me when I joined the army" and then it cut away - thought that was a pretty clear indication Don was asking point blank if they were gay (as they very evidently are... or, at least Hugo is)

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)

Altho didn't he explicitly ask the young guys Duck wanted to hire (the euro-gay guy and his buddy?)

naw i dont think so that whole interview don was on some vague contempt and the ferret-y dude did all the talking. + when hansel did tell the whole breakroom he was gay i remember being surprised too

part of what sometimes makes this show a drag for me is that it's increasingly hard to care a lot about the guy's fidelity

i do think that a lot of the stuff w/ don banging the stewardess chick - slipping in and out of identities casual fidelity the whole atmosphere - was partly to explain y sal was willing to make out with the bellhop rather than resist temptation like he had done when the cosmetics exec came on to him

jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)

when hansel did tell the whole breakroom he was gay i remember being surprised too

haha I think you need to adjust your gaydar

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:42 (sixteen years ago)

when he hired them, Don said "I'm gonna ask you what they asked me when I joined the army" and then it cut away

think youre misremembering - i believe he sd he was going to ask them what he'd been asked "in every job interview ever" or something - it def wasnt about the army anyway. i also dont think it cut away but i cant remember the qn maybe about being fired or why youd be good at the job. it was pretty banal iirc

jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:44 (sixteen years ago)

when he hired them, Don said "I'm gonna ask you what they asked me when I joined the army" and then it cut away -

he asked them if they'd ever been fired. do u even watch this show or what

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:45 (sixteen years ago)

sorry I don't remember word for word something I saw once a year ago

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)

in all fairness they are very similar questions

thomp, Monday, 17 August 2009 20:47 (sixteen years ago)

lol backpedal

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Monday, 17 August 2009 20:49 (sixteen years ago)

Don doesn't give a shit about Sal, he's already got his and Peggy's massive bit secrets going on up in there. One more won't make much difference.

Pretty sure that was meant to be the furthest Sal had ever gone with a guy. There's that one episode in the first series where the dude tries it on with him and Sal freaks out and turns him down.

Evil Brits be evil, but the best bit of the episode, apart from Ken and Pete, was Roger blundering in and going "hey, what did I miss?"

Tuncay Stryder (Matt DC), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:37 (sixteen years ago)

yeah the (great) "limit your exposure" scene is all don is probably ever going to say to sal about it. and i doubt very much that hed use the secret against sal--theyre not rivals or enemies

max, Monday, 17 August 2009 21:39 (sixteen years ago)

and we know the man can keep a secret, if he does nothing else well at all

or have I become completely absurd? (kenan), Monday, 17 August 2009 21:50 (sixteen years ago)

maybe you hadn't noticed but he is good at his job.

mizzell, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:06 (sixteen years ago)

I don't mean that Don will use it AGAINST Sal, but he will use it at some point. and he will use it to his advantage (he didn't use Peggy's pregnancy against her either, but he used her against Pete, to both of their benefit)

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:15 (sixteen years ago)

i mean maybe? cant really think of many situations where knowing that sal is gay will be useful

max, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:15 (sixteen years ago)

I have no idea and I'm not going to speculate, but this seems like too major a thing to spend half an episode on and not have it come into play somewhere down the line

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 22:20 (sixteen years ago)

I wondered last night if they were doing the David Chase anticlimax/resolution doesn't feel like a resolution thing (OK, Don knows, and the payoff is the "don't ask don't tell" speech on the plane), but I guess it's impossible to know until a long way down the line. If it does come back into play I predict it will be at least 7 episodes until it does.

Jouster, Monday, 17 August 2009 22:32 (sixteen years ago)

Things don't necessarily come back into play in Mad Men though. Anyway Don knows that Sal's got dirt on him too, what with the whole stewardess thing. But there may just be a "what goes on the trip stays on the trip" code thing at play here, for Don at least.

Tuncay Stryder (Matt DC), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:09 (sixteen years ago)

definitely the sal-is-gay thing will come in to play w/ sals character arc--and maybe the fact that don is aware will be impt--i just dont think its going to come into play in a "don uses it against sal" way... if theres one thing thats clear about don its that he doesnt really care who people are or what they do so long as theyre not making his life difficult

max, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:26 (sixteen years ago)

hes not, for example, pete, who would have told everyone about sal immediately

max, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:26 (sixteen years ago)

he doesnt really care who people are or what they do so long as theyre not making his life difficult

This and his ability to create good ad campaigns are really the only positives Don has going for him...which is strange for a protagonist in an American tv series, as we tend to favor building our series around heroes who right wrongs.

Johnny Fever, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:30 (sixteen years ago)

geez all I'm saying is Don will use this info to his advantage - not because he's an amoral twat like Pete, but because he's an opportunist. In what context he will use it remains to be seen.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:33 (sixteen years ago)

which is strange for a protagonist in an American tv series, as we tend to favor building our series around heroes who right wrongs.

― Johnny Fever, Monday, August 17, 2009 11:30 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark

i was trying to argue, when i started watching this, that there was something symptomatic about having a tv drama with a hollow man at the centre: and that there were a bunch of other american popular ents. of the moment which were in the same situation. but then i couldn't actually think what any of my other examples were, which kind of torpedoed that one —

thomp, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:43 (sixteen years ago)

Tony Soprano

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:44 (sixteen years ago)

i think breaking bad was the other one that i was trying to dredge up: but walter white and tony soprano and don draper are all fairly distinct ideas

thomp, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:47 (sixteen years ago)

I think the closest analogue is perhaps gatsby, and that don is part of a long lineage of American literature in that sense.

ryan, Monday, 17 August 2009 23:53 (sixteen years ago)

geez all I'm saying is Don will use this info to his advantage - not because he's an amoral twat like Pete, but because he's an opportunist.

meant to bring this up earlier but u kept saying he used peggy's secret and i was assuming u meant when he got her to come bail him and bobby b out of jail/take care of bobby but i wouldnt have thought of his actions in the sense of "using" just the secrets created a bond a btw them or w/e - a way of ensuring a trust. i can see the same thing happening w/sal but i can also see don just "forgetting" completely i dont think hes really operating the way u seem to

jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Monday, 17 August 2009 23:58 (sixteen years ago)

I see Sal having some future breakdown about hurting his wife/career etc and confiding in Don and his response being something like suck-it-up and keep doing your job well and no one will care (even if you're a army deserter who has lied about everything to his boss).

Spencer Chow, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:06 (sixteen years ago)

maybe you hadn't noticed but he is good at his job.

I gotta call unnecessary snark on this. (Don't know what the yardage penalty is for that.) He's very good at his job as defined the 50's, and he's not completely awful at selling products right where he is, but remember how he crapped all over the Volkswagen "Lemon" ad -- now one of the most famous magazine ads ever. Or how even though he really wants to sell coffee, the kids he brings in to sell coffee strike him as ridiculous first and useful second. No, Draper is on his way out, and he probably even knows it. He's straddling a very unfortunate line in the history of advertising. Isn't that one of the interesting things about his character?

or have I become completely absurd? (kenan), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:37 (sixteen years ago)

Draper : ad men :: Tony Soprano : mob guys

Right?

or have I become completely absurd? (kenan), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 00:44 (sixteen years ago)

his advice to london fog was terrible and antiquated too!

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 02:56 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.pantherhouse.com/newshelton/wp-content/uploads/hokusai.jpg

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 04:44 (sixteen years ago)

"character arc," jeezus, Robert McKee has killed everything

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 04:49 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah that's surely the problem with the world.

or have I become completely absurd? (kenan), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 05:10 (sixteen years ago)

no, just a handy excuse to overanalyze a TV show whose draw is cool clothes and nostalgia for chain-smoking and drinking at work

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 05:14 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah that's surely why we all like it and you don't.

or have I become completely absurd? (kenan), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 05:18 (sixteen years ago)

Go... make something.

or have I become completely absurd? (kenan), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 05:19 (sixteen years ago)

i did laugh at the hokkusai

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 08:56 (sixteen years ago)

probably the highlight, to be fair : /

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 08:56 (sixteen years ago)

I gotta call unnecessary snark on this. (Don't know what the yardage penalty is for that.) He's very good at his job as defined the 50's, and he's not completely awful at selling products right where he is, but remember how he crapped all over the Volkswagen "Lemon" ad -- now one of the most famous magazine ads ever. Or how even though he really wants to sell coffee, the kids he brings in to sell coffee strike him as ridiculous first and useful second. No, Draper is on his way out, and he probably even knows it. He's straddling a very unfortunate line in the history of advertising. Isn't that one of the interesting things about his character?

― or have I become completely absurd? (kenan), Monday, August 17, 2009 8:37 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

It has been pointed out that he is not on the vanguard of anything or working for the most prestigious firm, but he is the one that sees the value of the VW ad ("we've been talking about it for 15 minutes") and he is almost always represented as a savant of the sales pitch. Saying he's "not completely awful" is a strong understatement.

mizzell, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:58 (sixteen years ago)

This show is pretty dumb.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:11 (sixteen years ago)

ok, I think that's 3 of us for the MM challops club?

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:14 (sixteen years ago)

it's not a challops if it's dumm

cozwn, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:19 (sixteen years ago)

wait is morbius trying to reclaim challops as a positive

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:26 (sixteen years ago)

around here they are, 99%

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:29 (sixteen years ago)

it's not dumb, it's just not as smart as a lot of critics say it is. it has had (and will continue to have, probably) some silly plot turns, and the social satire tends toward the crushingly obvious. plus, the fewer flashbacks to little-don-on-the-prairie, the better.

but mainly, it's a lot of fun to watch, which is my primary criteria. it's a snazzy, snappy soap opera -- good enough for me.

flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:36 (sixteen years ago)

(at this point it's old hat to go on about its look and design, but it struck me again watching this episode how nice it is to see something that somebody has gone to so much trouble over. there's a labor-of-love aspect of the show that is very appealing.)

flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:38 (sixteen years ago)

i think the only way the show could be construed as dumb in the context of TV shows would be to condescend to the mores and fashions of the time...but i dont really see that. i can't help but see the show as directing us towards our own place in history.

particularly, maybe this is the point of those silly flashbacks. Don's relationship to that era mirrors our relationship to his. i guess that's why im still trying to figure out what i think about them.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:45 (sixteen years ago)

http://i26.tinypic.com/2m6saz4.jpg

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:01 (sixteen years ago)

meant to bring this up earlier but u kept saying he used peggy's secret and i was assuming u meant when he got her to come bail him and bobby b out of jail

to go waaaay back... no I was referring to how Don was aware there was something going on between Peggy and Pete (don't remember if this was before or after the mystery birth) and Don deliberately elevated Peggy in order to needle and undermine Pete.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:25 (sixteen years ago)

Draper : ad men :: Tony Soprano : mob guys

I noted some other significant parallels upthread but yeah this is a good one

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:26 (sixteen years ago)

i never got the sense that don was aware of peggy/pete. what are you referring to?

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:27 (sixteen years ago)

i think he could just tell that pete was annoyed by peggy's success.

mizzell, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:29 (sixteen years ago)

How can we critique this show when, clearly, none of us are capable of accurately following its plot?

Dan I., Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:29 (sixteen years ago)

I don't think the show is particularly well-written, and as social satire or critique I actually find it offensive. Take Peggy's plotline in season 1, for example. Peggy becomes a copywriter in a storyline that would look ridiculous in a modern romcom starring Anne Hathaway, much less a show purporting to critique the sexism and misogyny of the '60s. She gets her job because she happens to say something halfway clever to the right man at the right time. He didn't take her words without asking, or promote her to his "assistant" so he could take credit for her ideas, she didn't have to fight for a position or to have ownership of her ideas. She didn't even have any ambition at that point. The show basically implies that no woman had ever been a copywriter at Sterling Cooper prior to Peggy because no woman had ever happened to sound talented in front of a man before. And once she becomes a copywriter, the obstacles the show puts in her path to success are incredibly underplayed. She's shut out of the boys' club meetings, but once she finds out about them she's welcomed and no one is upset to see her there. None of her clients ever talk down to her or around her or request a different copywriter (which is ridiculous on two levels, considering that Peggy is both a woman and a woman who comes across as unassertive and childlike [which is a whole post unto itself about why Matthew Wiener thought that the trailblazing first woman copywriter at SC should be someone who can barely stammer out a sentence]).

The show is trying to have sexism both ways. It has all the "naughty" fun of blatant sexual harassment (and don't get me started on how much the show sexualizes its own critique of sexual harassment) without acknowledging that men were also actively guarding and protecting their white male privilege at all costs, and would have seen Peggy's ascendancy as a direct threat to their survival. Women did actually have to fight tooth and nail against people who actively fought to keep them down to gain positions like Peggy's. But we haven't seen that with her at all. Even her take charge moments, like when she asks Roger for Freddy's office, are played out so that it seems like the reason women had never gotten ahead at Sterling Cooper before was because they never bothered to ask. This plays out again with Joan when she gets the temporary job reading scripts for the TV department, but puts up not even the most cursory fight when the job she loved was taken away from her. The show consistently avoids showing the men actually and purposely standing in the way of the success of women (that might make them unsympathetic!) in favor of making it seem like the patriarchy had just beaten women down so much that they had no fight in them at all, no ambition. Thus leaving the poor men clueless that women even wanted to succeed.

Oh, and somehow 1960 turned all women into humorless Gossip Girl caricatures who were just frothing at the mouth to call each other whores. It's true! Women had no real friends until 1970 and up until then were just biting at each other like pit bulls striving for supremacy. Obviously.

Betty is more of the same. We're supposed to see her as childlike and unstable and incapable of self-reflection or even understanding what she wants. And that'd be one thing if there were other characters to balance her out, but she's pretty much more of the same.

And then there's the show's (lack of a) take on race. There are no main characters of color (ridiculous), the few that have appeared have had less than a minute of screen time each, and the show acts like New York City in 1962 would be a sealed bubble where no one is talking about race. The show is deathly afraid of confronting race or even depicting its characters as racist. And Matthew "historical accuracy" Wiener goes so far as to have Roger say in a season 2 episode that "they've hired a colored kid over at BBDO", thus acknowledging that that is a story the show could realistically be telling at Sterling Cooper in 1962, but has instead chosen to have it happen off-screen at that other, clearly much more interesting ad agency. And even in season 3, all indications so far have been that the season is about more of Don's boring angst and this whole British merger. But who knows, maybe the elevator operator will say something really clever in front of Don and we can be told another story about how the only reason POC had never worked at Sterling Cooper before was because they just didn't ask or appear talented in front of the right people at the right time.

I think the show is ultimately cowardly and far too interested in shining a light up Don's ass rather than depicting the '60s, blemishes and all (unless those blemishes are sexy and mean you get to show stewardesses disrobing at the slightest urging and more of that sexy sexual harassment).

To be honest, aside from the language and sex and some of the ~edginess~, I don't even see how this story is markedly different from the one that would have been told if the show was actually a movie made in 1960.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:33 (sixteen years ago)

whoah its the 90s

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:35 (sixteen years ago)

The show is deathly afraid of confronting race or even depicting its characters as racist. A

I mean come on this isn't even true. Joan is explicitly shown being racist

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:36 (sixteen years ago)

coates on mad men and race

I actually think it's a beautiful, lovely, incredibly powerful omission. Mad Men is a show told from the perspective of a particular world. The people in that world barely see black people. They're there all the time--Hollis in the elevator, women working in the powder-room, the Draper's maid, the janitors, the black guy hired at Leo Burnett--but they're never quite seen. I think this is an incredible statement on how privilege, at its most insidious, really works.

http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/08/race_and_mad_men.php

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)

i think that's a powerful critique but you're straining to oversimplify a few things.

first of all--look at HOW peggy infiltrates the boy's club meetings. sitting on laps, etc.

and, xpost damnit, i was gonna post the TNC too!

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.doublex.com/section/arts/why-mad-men-afraid-race?page=0,0 - I find this more compelling, frankly.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)

The show is trying to have sexism both ways. It has all the "naughty" fun of blatant sexual harassment (and don't get me started on how much the show sexualizes its own critique of sexual harassment) without acknowledging that men were also actively guarding and protecting their white male privilege at all costs, and would have seen Peggy's ascendancy as a direct threat to their survival.

totally agree with the first part of this, it definitely has it both ways. second part i don't agree with, i think the men are very clearly seen guarding their white male privilege, it's a major theme of the series. likewise, i think there've been plenty of depictions of racism, both in acts of commission and omission, although race per se is not a major theme. you can argue whether it should be, but it's not something the series set out to deal with in any substantive way. (which, to be fair, i think was the attitude of a lot of professional white people at the time -- race wasn't something they wanted to concern themselves with too much. if you were in the northeast, you were probably mostly happy to believe that unpleasantness was all happening elsewhere.)

flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:42 (sixteen years ago)

xpost to that coates post, which sort of says the same thing.

flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:42 (sixteen years ago)

the show is much better for not being an after school special

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:42 (sixteen years ago)

you were probably mostly happy to believe that unpleasantness was all happening elsewhere.)

haha ywah like Newark

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)

yeah

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)

and of course far from heaven -- which very directly deals with race -- makes the same point when the guy at the cocktail party says something like, "there are no negroes in connecticut." (while accepting a drink from a black waiter, of course.)

flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)

There are no main characters of color (ridiculous)

looooooooooool

jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:45 (sixteen years ago)

the cosbys shouldve had a white baby imo

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:46 (sixteen years ago)

recast mad men

cozwn, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:48 (sixteen years ago)

don draper
http://blogs.kansascity.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/01/07/marlo.jpg

cozwn, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:48 (sixteen years ago)

hey what else was going on in the mid-60s and why aren't they showing it!?!?!?

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:49 (sixteen years ago)

ken cosgrove
http://noctos.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/omarlittle.jpg

cozwn, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:49 (sixteen years ago)

Awesome derailment, guys. A++

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:49 (sixteen years ago)

we r making fun of u lol ;)

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:50 (sixteen years ago)

don draper : marlowe :: tony soprano : bill cosby

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:50 (sixteen years ago)

betty draper
http://www.nakedcelebritieshere.com/kristinproctor/kristin-proctor-boobs-002.jpg

cozwn, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:50 (sixteen years ago)

this totally the sopranos of ad men!!!! with snakes!!!

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:51 (sixteen years ago)

anyway mad men isn't a satire it's a character based drama

cozwn, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:51 (sixteen years ago)

srsly

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:53 (sixteen years ago)

its super good and smart too - way gooder and smarter than those on this thread saying its not good and smart

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:54 (sixteen years ago)

mad men isnt a character based drama its a modern romcom starring anne hathaway

jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:55 (sixteen years ago)

whoa sopranos was a character based drama too did i just blow ur mind

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:55 (sixteen years ago)

my lyfe is a modern romcom staring anne hathaway :/

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:56 (sixteen years ago)

One thing about the show regarding Peggy: I think that people are willing to accept Peggy as a novelty basically because she's an anomaly. There's not really a threat there. Not yet, because they can't imagine it yet. Even Peggy feels threatened by shifting gender norms, I'd like to argue, and her character is fascinating because she's not in any way a gender rights standard bearer but simply personally ambitious.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:56 (sixteen years ago)

my life is a character based drama : /

cozwn, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:57 (sixteen years ago)

Melissa, I think you're mixing up normative and descriptive and I think you're assuming that Weiner must have intentions vis a vis this show that you have, which is a little unfair. You're not wrong about this being about shining a light up Don's ass - it's a soap opera of sorts - but I disagree about this being essentially the same as an early-Sixties production. It is more about Don and his past and path than a social critique and as such, yes, perhaps a reversion to a kind of Freudian narrative but not necessarily a bad reminder that feminist/gender/sociology based views of life don't really have a monopoly on 'correct' or even interesting narratives. Our 'hero' is an 'inauthentic' womanizer but everyone's actions on this show reveal themsleves to be exotic by our modern standards and perhaps, they were. The past is a different country.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 15:58 (sixteen years ago)

eh wieners pulling the ol tony soprano w/draper - presenting a character whos objectively reprehensible then having him charm the pants off u creating conflict - this is what we in the industry call the "sizzle"

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:00 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.foxnews.com/images/481847/2_63_romcom_hanks_320.jpg

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:02 (sixteen years ago)

"we're reverting to a kind of freudian narrative!"

jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:03 (sixteen years ago)

Michael, it's very comforting to think that the past is different country, and I think that's a distancing tactic both in discourse and that the show uses so the audience can congratulate themselves on how much progress they feel they've made compared to these people. But 1960 wasn't that long ago, and the people I know who hate Mad Men the most are the people who were actually there. My Mexican grandfather had a job every bit as prestigious as any ad man on Mad Men in a company full of white men (and he had the scars to prove it), my grandmother fought tooth and nail for her career (and also had a sense of humor and real friends). I don't think it's sociologically or politically correct to want the world of Mad Men to reflect people and situations as they actually were, considering that that seems to be Matthew's goal re: authenticity. I'd like to see the same care taken with the characters and women and poc that he puts into making sure the fucking WEATHER and the size of apples is accurate.

I feel like his idea of authenticity involves long meaningful silences or characters who don't realize the situations they're in or moments like showing how much Joan's bra-straps hurt her to represent all the pressure of the patriarchy (which, protip to men: bras are necessary evils for most women that don't have anything to do with men).

The idea that I seem to be getting here is that Mad Men exists in a vacuum and choosing to tell a story in the '60s all about white men and a few token, unrealistic women somehow doesn't exist in a larger context of people consistently choosing to tell that same story over and over again. That there's nothing problematic about the fact that this is the story Mad Men has chosen to tell. That it's just accidentally or coincidentally about the same old thing again. It's a character drama! It's about the '60s! It has no choice! It has to be about Don Draper! The show would love to tell those other stories, it just can't!

But the implication I'm getting here from the majority of posters is that that story just isn't even worth being told and that to do so would just be giving in to the politically correct or the feminists or some bitch on the internet who has some opinions that about Mad Men that aren't favorable.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)

Melissa, I think your points, as I said above, are definitely valid and for me definitely worth thinking about. But looking over your first post again i still think you're going out of your way to simplify or pigeonhole the characters, especially the women characters.

the show has this weird relationships to female stereotypes. The sexpot, the hitchcock blonde, the childlike peggy....Betty feels like a hollow character because she IS a hollow character, almost everyone who has what they are supposed to WANT in life is portrayed that way.

Joan's refusal to stand up for the job she enjoyed is heartbreaking, but i dont see why it's more relevant to the times to show her fighting for it instead.

Peggy, as i said, is a fascinating character, easily the best on the show, and i love the refusal by the (majority female, it's worth pointing out) writers to portray her as a an entirely sympathetic heroine. (at least, i dont find her entirely sympathetic). and her attempts to find her way through the coming decade will prove to be the most interesting, her ascendency and don's eventual irrelevance.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:25 (sixteen years ago)

Melissa, I've never seen the show, but I gotta say in response to your posts so far: same ol ILX. Good luck on this uphill battle you've undertaken.

The Lion's Mane Jellyfish, pictured here with its only natural predator (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:27 (sixteen years ago)

i think, what you want, is more blood sweat and tears.....to show more tooth and nail CONFLICT regarding race and gender. you want the horrible oppression these people lived under to be made clear.

i understand BUT let's look at what the show really is. about an ad agency. and it's also about how these people have constructed a bubble to keep out EXACTLY what you are wanting to see. the joy of the show is seeing the fractures and fissures beginning to form around that bubble.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:28 (sixteen years ago)

Matthew Wiener thought that the trailblazing first woman copywriter at SC should be someone who can barely stammer out a sentence

peggy is obviously talented and assertive within the context of SC. you are being willfully blind here. you've also misread or misremembered basic details such as

when she asks Roger for Freddy's office, are played out so that it seems like the reason women had never gotten ahead at Sterling Cooper before was because they never bothered to ask

roger specifically says none of the other JUNIOR EXECS had the balls to ask. he gives peggy the office because she is more assertive than the rest of her peers, who are all men. it's nothing to do with the secretaries.

goth casual, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:29 (sixteen years ago)

white men and a few token, unrealistic women

the deliberate mischaraterizations and oversimplified hyperbole don't really help your argument

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:30 (sixteen years ago)

it's not for nothing that the show is often called lynchian. it certainly is a false construct of an idealistic 60s...the 60s we wish we had...and i think it gives us enough credit (maybe too much?) to notice the exclusions and hypocrisies for ourselves. then again, maybe im trying to justify something i enjoy.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:31 (sixteen years ago)

The idea that I seem to be getting here is that Mad Men exists in a vacuum and choosing to tell a story in the '60s all about white men and a few token, unrealistic women somehow doesn't exist in a larger context of people consistently choosing to tell that same story over and over again. That there's nothing problematic about the fact that this is the story Mad Men has chosen to tell. That it's just accidentally or coincidentally about the same old thing again. It's a character drama! It's about the '60s! It has no choice! It has to be about Don Draper! The show would love to tell those other stories, it just can't!

And why should it? This is not a documentary. It's a multi-player work of fiction with very detailed set dressing and an almost hyper-fantasized quality about it. Why would we assume that all women in the workforce were in actuality unambitious gossipers when we not for one second assume a person like Don Draper ever existed?

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:33 (sixteen years ago)

Ryan, I guess what I'm saying is that the bubble was an illusion. There was conflict, but when it came to someone like Don Draper, they had enough armor that it appeared inconsequential to the point of being able to deny that it even happened. But that didn't mean that the effected people weren't putting up a fight, or that people didn't at the very least bitch loudly about it when they were in a safe space. Things didn't move forwards because men like Roger just suddenly became ok with the idea of things moving forwards, it's because people WERE actively fighting to get there with every last reserve of strength they had.

And thanks, Laurel.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:34 (sixteen years ago)

i remarked to my 62 year old mother than often while watching Mad Men I feel a very strong sense of unease, like at Betty's dinner party. I'm terrified at any moment something embarrassing or horrible is gonna happen. my mother immediately replied "that's what it was like!"

I agree Melissa. the show is certainly unbalanced in the characters it chooses to focus on, and maybe that inbalance is evidence of some wish or desire to indulge in that lifestyle. and, let's be honest, that's a big appeal of the show.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:35 (sixteen years ago)

roger specifically says none of the other JUNIOR EXECS had the balls to ask. he gives peggy the office because she is more assertive than the rest of her peers, who are all men. it's nothing to do with the secretaries.

I didn't say it had anything to do with secretaries or women, I'm saying that Roger's response was unrealistic and that the show repeatedly suggests that even someone like him has no problem at all with Peggy.

And why should it? This is not a documentary. It's a multi-player work of fiction with very detailed set dressing and an almost hyper-fantasized quality about it. Why would we assume that all women in the workforce were in actuality unambitious gossipers when we not for one second assume a person like Don Draper ever existed?

I'm trying to see your point here but I'm not sure you have one. Why should any story not be about white men or display a broader and more realistic spectrum of the human experience? Why should a show strive to realistically portray women as intelligent and self-aware and ambitious?

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:40 (sixteen years ago)

i thought one of the more poignant shots in the entire show was post-picnic with don and betty, and all the litter they left behind.

not so much because "lol they littered" but the obvious broader commentary being made there. about the waste and destruction left in the wake of the construction of the ideal lives. what the show chooses to keep on the margins could be seen as an especially sensitive commentary, as TNC argues about race, or as meaningless gestures to being more progressive than it really is.

I'd hope, on some level, that it's about our conflicted relationship to the highs and lows of that era.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:40 (sixteen years ago)

why would roger be threatened by peggy?!

goth casual, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:41 (sixteen years ago)

he treats her with the same amused disdain he treats all the copywriters.

goth casual, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:42 (sixteen years ago)

Why should a show strive to realistically portray women as intelligent and self-aware and ambitious?

realistically speaking, not all women are intelligent, self aware and ambitious (neither are all men, obviously). Flawed characters are more interesting than perfect ones.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:42 (sixteen years ago)

I just think its weird to set out some a priori, socio-politically constructed idea of what a show SHOULD be and then rail about how shows don't meet that criteria. Prepare for lifetime of disappointment.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:43 (sixteen years ago)

another interesting thing about the show: it's SHOT like an old movie. Especially season 2 with some Hitchcockian camera angles. it would be interesting to imagine a roving Wire-style hand-held camera approach to the same subject matter....but i think in that particular choice of style the creators are showing their hand--that the show is about in many ways the ideal constructs of the time, and our own ideal constructs OF that time.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:44 (sixteen years ago)

Roger is a dinosaur partner of a company that has never hired a woman to an upper-level position before Peggy. You do the math. It's supposed to be coincidence that she's the first? He's not going to see that as something unusual and possibly ill-advised?

x-post

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:45 (sixteen years ago)

why should he give a shit? He doesn't even know the copywriters names or show up when people get fired!

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:45 (sixteen years ago)

lol @ copywriters being "upper level"

goth casual, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:46 (sixteen years ago)

Compared to the secretarial pool they are. She has the ability to turn off potential clients, I don't see someone like Roger being immediately ok with putting her into that position.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:50 (sixteen years ago)

she got the position because clients liked her & her work!

goth casual, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:50 (sixteen years ago)

(ok not exactly but she & her work have been praised by clients)

goth casual, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:51 (sixteen years ago)

I mean come on this isn't even true. Joan is explicitly shown being racist

― go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier)

Joan may be racist, but if you are referring to the incident where she tells the black girl Paul is dating that she's "surprised he's so progressive" or whatever then I don't think that would count. She was clearly just trying to make the girl uncomfortable (like she does with everyone) and was just referring to race since it was convenient. if Paul had only dated redheads/college girls/Presbyterians/models before her I'm sure Joan would have made a similar crack.

musically, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:52 (sixteen years ago)

realistically speaking, not all women are intelligent, self aware and ambitious (neither are all men, obviously). Flawed characters are more interesting than perfect ones.

^^^this!

re: Peggy and her peers. I think it's clearly obvious she causes discomfort in the office from all sides. The secretarial pool resents her because she moved up. The other junior execs resent her because she's both a woman and seemingly Don's protégé. As has been pointed out, Roger granted her the office because she was the only one willing to step up and ask for it. I honestly believe Roger is written and portrayed as someone who floats through that office on a cloud and cares very little about the goings on of those people further down the food chain.

Dissecting and intellectualizing this show removes about 99.9% of the fun from it, though. So cut it out!

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:52 (sixteen years ago)

you're all sociopaths, btw

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:53 (sixteen years ago)

said with love

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:53 (sixteen years ago)

That is the Joan/Paul/race incident I'm referring to, I thought Joan said something else to Paul about it in private too tho

x-post

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:53 (sixteen years ago)

peggy is a bit of an outlier - she like a lot of this show portends a near future that radically upsets the social order of the day - theres tsunami coming and don draper et al have no idea

she is however not an avatar for a whole movement - shes a particular person with her own path - she doesnt seem to see herself as fighting for anything in particular beyond personal advancement - and the form of her struggle involves v little frontal confrontation - that wouldnt fly at the completely patriarchal sterling cooper - shes a second class citizen whos rise is almost entirely enabled by one motherfucker w/dark secrets who happens to have a soft spot for outsiders - thats a relationship between characters w/a smattering of social overtones - not the other way around

yr concerns melissa seem to completely outside of the range of what makes mad men work or not as a good tv show - its like complaining that these led zeppelins should put some proper shirts on and stop w/all the guitar solos - in that you seem to want it to be and mean something that it is completely not and are presenting yr argument in a highly moral fashion you shouldnt be surprised that most are rolling their eyes at u

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:54 (sixteen years ago)

Anyway, I like Mad Men, but certainly not as much as most people here seem to. I don't love it profoundly like I did The Wire, nor do I crave each upcoming episode like crack a la True Blood. The show seems more like art than television, fun to look at but not overly compelling.

musically, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:54 (sixteen years ago)

Dissecting and intellectualizing this show removes about 99.9% of the fun from it, though. So cut it out!

Sigh.

The Lion's Mane Jellyfish, pictured here with its only natural predator (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:55 (sixteen years ago)

that was a joke btw

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:57 (sixteen years ago)

(at least I took it as a joke on Johnny Fever's part)

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:57 (sixteen years ago)

No seriously. There are about 70 million different sources we could all access to read up on or watch people talk about the real 1962. I don't watch Mad Men for an education or demand it offer up some social justice.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:58 (sixteen years ago)

one more thing: i can hardly think of another show (maybe Sopranos comes to mind) that does such a thorough job of showing the seductive force of power without (as I see it) condoning it.

there is a sense perhaps that admitting how seductive the patriarchal/racist power structures of Mad Men are that allows us to see through it.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:58 (sixteen years ago)

that is, seductive if you're not the one being excluded.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:59 (sixteen years ago)

(but yes, the above statement was meant to sound jokingly "huffy")

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 16:59 (sixteen years ago)

Why should any story not be about white men or display a broader and more realistic spectrum of the human experience?

This is slippery ground that can lead to its own exclusions. Why should a show set in the early 60's be about Americans or people in NY at all? They certainly weren't the majority and by that standard can hardly be called representative of the era. It's the love-hate aspect that i think appeals to this story of upper-middle class (by American standards) white people, predominantly men. They have privilege and smart togs and get to drink at work and exert dominance, etc... but they're also monsters by our present standards. I wonder what blind spot is common to us, now, that will be universally pilloried amidst stupefaction that we could be so dumb in the future?

Things didn't move forwards because men like Roger just suddenly became ok with the idea of things moving forwards, it's because people WERE actively fighting to get there with every last reserve of strength they had.

A valid point though not completely incriminating.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:12 (sixteen years ago)

ice cr?m, I don't think a "good tv show" exists independently of its sociopolitical significance, not just because those issues are "important", but because they are personal. Maybe Mad Men is good for you, but Mad Men is designed so that you may see yourself reflected in it. I can't be entertained by Mad Men because all I see is the show refusing to reflect me or my experience as a woman or as a POC, refusing to reflect the experience of my friends and relatives, and refusing to reflect the experience of a whole fuck-ton of people who actually remember the '60s for more than its fucking cocktail dresses. It's not FUN for me to watch men getting away with metaphorical murder. It's not entertaining to watch a bunch of broken women with no friends hate themselves and each other without also reflecting the fact that women at the time actually WERE angry and aware and working towards something better. It's not fun to watch a show that pretends that people who look like me had no voice or presence at all in the '60s, even when I know full fucking well that they did.

And Mad Men has billed itself as a show about social issues, about showing the dark underbelly of the '60s. If that's not what it actually wants to show, I question why it was made at all or why they chose that setting.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:14 (sixteen years ago)

And Mad Men has billed itself as a show about social issues, about showing the dark underbelly of the '60s.

If this show has taught us anything, it's to not trust advertising.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:18 (sixteen years ago)

I can't be entertained by Mad Men because all I see is the show refusing to reflect me or my experience as a woman or as a POC,

but what about women who ARE entertained by it (like, say, my wife - who has made a point of discussing how much she enjoys the depth and attention devoted to the female characters)? what does this say about them? is there experience of the show invalid?

refusing to reflect the experience of my friends and relatives

wow, I REALLY don't expect to see my friends and relatives on TV, like ever. and I am a white (Jewish) man. If anything, I find the escapism more appealling, the detailing of a foreign world is fascinating - I'm not such a narcissist that I require my pop culture to solely reflect an idealized version of myself. (Lolz there are NO JEWS on this show! WHAT THE FUCK!?! TV SMASH)

and refusing to reflect the experience of a whole fuck-ton of people who actually remember the '60s for more than its fucking cocktail dresses

again (apparently this can't be restated enough) a show cannot cover EVERYTHING about a decade. A LOT happened in the 60s (why not complain about there being no mention of Vietnam, or immigrants, or rock music, or or or....)

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:21 (sixteen years ago)

I can't be entertained by Mad Men because all I see is the show refusing to reflect me or my experience as a woman or as a POC

Discrimination and exclusion are stupid, not to mention, evil, but if you never identify with anyone that closely resembles you, won't you end up practicing it?

The second person who has dialogue in this show, as I recall, was a black waiter and that was surely more representative of the time than the few outstanding pioneers that you wish to have here. To push that too hard is to falsify the past, too. This is an agency that has to search to find a Jew, after all. If it's a shwo about social issues, it has so far been largely about how the powerful, white men in the most powerful country (comparatively) ever deal with the small erosions of modernity on their privilege (after a decade of distinct consolidation after WWII). To want to turn it into a show about your grandfather is fine, but that's another show, a show about pluck and determination and courage and dignity. This is a show about power and deceit and gender soldarity and if you think its glamour bedazzles too much, perhaps that's their point at some level.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:22 (sixteen years ago)

The show is from the POV of and constructed through the dominant Powers of the day. And what's especially interesting about it is that it seems determined to examine the upheavals of the 60s through that lens of Power, to show it cracking from the inside. And THEN we get to see what sort of sacrifices someone like Peggy has to make to achieve that status for herself, what exclusions she'll have to endorse, etc...

so, again, Melissa, I'd argue that the show knows that, and that the "silence" you hear on that front is pretty damn loud. i dont get any sense from the show that you're supposed to find any of that shit entertaining or fun, but i think it's only intellectually honest for someone like me to admit that the kind of power on display on a show like Mad Men is mighty seductive, and that's part of the point. Maybe making such a broad foucaultian point is politically irrelevant from your own POV of but it IS in my view something interesting and worth engaging with and i dont see the show as an unabashed celebration of 60 chauvinism but an attempt to have a complex and even contrite engagement with it.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:23 (sixteen years ago)

Shakey, who said anything about idealized versions? And if you think wanting to see more tv about people who aren't white men (especially within the context of a show purporting to be about the effects the changes of the '60s had on an advertising agency) can be characterized as "narcissism", I have nothing left to fucking say to you other than fuck you and check your fucking privilege.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:24 (sixteen years ago)

hats off to M. White, always an erudite voice of reason

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:25 (sixteen years ago)

fuckity fucking fuck fuck

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:25 (sixteen years ago)

This is boring. I'm bored now.

~Jack Donaghy, privileged white corporate male

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)

And if you think wanting to see more tv about people who aren't white men

are you really making this argument, seriously? I mean, do you actually watch television? Can we see some statistics here? Cuz since the advent of mass market cable, the age of being forced to watch nothing but white men is really, REALLY over.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:28 (sixteen years ago)

looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooool

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:29 (sixteen years ago)

i think, Melissa, the target of your anger is perhaps more appropriately the hype surrounding the show and the whole re-mystification of that era's relationship to race and gender.

it's also worth pointing out that here was a show that achieved such a level of hype and appeal to nostalgia that ALSO had a full-on hot make out session between two men that shocked and appalled many of my mother's conservative friends. that's not what they thought they were signing up for!

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:30 (sixteen years ago)

Shakey, who said anything about idealized versions?

this insistence that there must be an intelligent, self-aware, ambitious female character (ie, an IDEAL female character) - almost all the people on this show are reprehensible, especially the men!

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:30 (sixteen years ago)

This is pre-Loving, pre-Miranda, pre-Roe, pre-bussing, pre-counter culture after all but close enough to me (40 yr old white Californian) and my older brother and parents that I can recall aspects of this kind of society. Raised by hippies, essentially, that culture was always foreign and distasteful to me; full of hypocrisy, fear and tension that I loathed and felt was also weak on their part back then. Otoh, compared to my parents' clothes and furnishings, my relatively cool grandparents also had sleeker clothes and furniture and a better sense of humor.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:31 (sixteen years ago)

I don't see how intelligence, self-awareness, or ambition precludes reprehensibility. It certainly doesn't stop Don!

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:31 (sixteen years ago)

intelligent, self-aware, ambitious female character

wait so which of these doesn't describe peggy?
xxp

mizzell, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:32 (sixteen years ago)

well self-aware is a stretch

goth casual, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:35 (sixteen years ago)

She's getting there.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:35 (sixteen years ago)

melissa i assure you i find v little glamor in the lives and culture portrayed on mad men - its worth noting that the men are just as miserable as the women - being repressive is no more a recipe for happiness than is being repressed - the whole environment is quite poisonous

so what do i find fun abt this show - its the art of it - theres just a v high level of craftsmanship and insight and humor and daring - mostly having to do with characterization - i do think its pretty deep on the social end too - but thats not central and its portrayed mostly through the various social degradations of the day - its a negative critique as far as that aspect goes - no positive role models are presented

mad men is never going to be the microcosm of the era that you want - nothing in it at all pretends that people who look you had no voice or presence at all in the '60s - it has abt characters and all of them are more or less stuck in a v mainstream 50s existence - it doesnt make any claim beyond that culture - which was v pervasive at the time - if it wasnt all the fighting to make things better you want to see portrayed wouldnt have been necessary

this is not the great american tv show

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:35 (sixteen years ago)

this is not the great american tv show

No, that was 'All in the Family'. ;)

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:37 (sixteen years ago)

Peggy isn't given much of a chance to verbalize her intelligence or her world view or how she views her position in life or at Sterling Cooper. She's ambitious (well, she becomes ambitious) and somewhat clever, but she's also a cipher with no human connections.

x-post

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:37 (sixteen years ago)

peggy is tough and getting tougher but she has v little self awareness - introspection is frowned on at sterling cooper - which makes dons creative process so thrilling and transgressive - people are scared and fascinated when he goes into that trance

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:40 (sixteen years ago)

best scene on the show: peggy talking about losing a "part" of herself to pete, meaning the baby explicitly, but implicitly suggesting the sacrifices and exclusions that have to be made to achieve power.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:40 (sixteen years ago)

http://frasermacpherson.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/greatest-american-hero.jpg

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:41 (sixteen years ago)

but she is the only one that seems able to speak to don about the process and learn from him. all the other writes just throw up their hands and come up with more puns.
xxp

mizzell, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:42 (sixteen years ago)

I guess I don't consider the show particularly insightful, ice cr?m. I don't just not see my friends and relatives in those characters, I don't see realistic human beings at all. I think the "meaningful silences" are kind of a trick the show plays. And I find the humor largely "bitchy" or "lol the '60s" in a way that I don't find particularly clever or funny.

It's a very pretty show in terms of set design, but even there it's a hermetically sealed fantasy world.

And I guess I just don't see why it can only tell the story of being "stuck in a v mainstream '50s existence". That's a good place to spin off of, but it would work better (IMO) with deliberate contrast.

x-posts

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:42 (sixteen years ago)

best scene on the show: peggy talking about losing a "part" of herself to pete, meaning the baby explicitly, but implicitly suggesting the sacrifices and exclusions that have to be made to achieve power.

^^^yes. was just about to mention this. this was a very achingly real human connection-kind of thing with Pete.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:42 (sixteen years ago)

this is powerful art

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yWyLaXCV2_s

do not attempt to deny it

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:43 (sixteen years ago)

but she's also a cipher with no human connections.

But people like this DO exist in real life.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:44 (sixteen years ago)

the greatest american hero reflects my experience as a curly haired white dude

velko, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:44 (sixteen years ago)

somewhat clever, but she's also a cipher with no human connections.

What about her (weird) affair with Pete Campbell? Her catty relationship with Joan? Her relationship with her mother and her priest? Her relationhisp with Don? I think you're pressing your point too hard; forcing it.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:45 (sixteen years ago)

That's a good place to spin off of, but it would work better (IMO) with deliberate contrast.

there have been "cracks in the facade" so to speak - Don hanging out with the beatniks, going to California, Kinsey's party, Sal's gay flirtations - and I expect there will be more as the show gets further into the decade. Note that most of these "cracks" have been greeted by the main characters with a mixture of confusion and curiosity and fear.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:46 (sixteen years ago)

That's a good place to spin off of, but it would work better (IMO) with deliberate contrast.

Bring back Midge!

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:46 (sixteen years ago)

But people like this DO exist in real life.

Not denying that, but wondering why there's no counter to Peggy (or Betty, or even Joan quite frankly). Rachel kind of worked for that, but she disappeared rather quickly.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:46 (sixteen years ago)

Bobbie is definitely ambitious, intelligent, and self-aware. Also incredibly unhappy and trapped.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:48 (sixteen years ago)

(just like everyone else on the show!)

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:48 (sixteen years ago)

there have been "cracks in the facade" so to speak - Don hanging out with the beatniks

Though the show kind of goes to the "Don may be an asshole, but he's still better than a fucking beatnik" place with those episodes. I mean, they're all insolent space cadets.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:48 (sixteen years ago)

Bobbie also disappears pretty quickly, though.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:48 (sixteen years ago)

i did miss Rachel in season 2.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:49 (sixteen years ago)

Not denying that, but wondering why there's no counter to Peggy (or Betty, or even Joan quite frankly).

Midge and Rachel had those apsects but to insist on them is to insist on a number of empowered women which maybe didn't exist at the same levels then? I read an essay that said that most of the economic development in the 'developped world' over the last 60 years was mostly due to the integration of women into the economic workforce. 1963 was certainly less integrated than, say, 2009.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:49 (sixteen years ago)

melissa art doesnt have to be realistic to be good - generally its better if its not - people surely never spoke the way they do in dostoevsky - sunflowers dont look the way van gogh painted them - and sarah im sure is not at all an accurate accounting of bob dylans marriage - but it doesnt mean that those works dont have depth - they have incredible insight - and in fact its their stylized forms which allow the brilliance to shine through

and wanting mad men to be something that its not - a show abt your friends and relatives and other things you hold dear - is not really a criticism - its just wanting to watch another show

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:51 (sixteen years ago)

I mean, they're all insolent space cadets.

Well, to some extent, the Beats were! Also, his conformist point: "I'm a wealthy white dude with a suit. I don't have to be scared of the cops." Is that not telling of smomething or some lack in his soul?

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:51 (sixteen years ago)

its certainly telling of his relationship to power and his enjoyment of it

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:52 (sixteen years ago)

Peggy isn't given much of a chance to verbalize her intelligence or her world view or how she views her position in life or at Sterling Cooper. She's ambitious (well, she becomes ambitious) and somewhat clever, but she's also a cipher with no human connections.

this is the poignancy of her character! she is extraordinarily lonely and clings to her job for every shred of self-worth it gives her. don would be the same except for the fact that he's smoking and has an active and complicated sex life.

melissa again peggy is a flawed character--your criticism is ironic cause i think you'd actually like for her to be a cipher for all your talking points... i mean, which human being ever could do all you ask in this one sentence?

many xposts

goth casual, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:53 (sixteen years ago)

Roger is a dinosaur partner of a company that has never hired a woman to an upper-level position before Peggy. You do the math. It's supposed to be coincidence that she's the first? He's not going to see that as something unusual and possibly ill-advised?

x-post

― Melissa W, Tuesday, August 18, 2009 12:45 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

somewhat pedantic, but peggy says that she is the first female copywriter since the war. so either they had some rosie the riveters filling in or the firm was previously less patriarchal before becoming more conservative during the 50s, which sterling would remember.

mizzell, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:53 (sixteen years ago)

melissa again peggy is a flawed character--your criticism is ironic cause i think you'd actually like for her to be a cipher for all your talking points... i mean, which human being ever could do all you ask in this one sentence?

There's a big difference between a flawed character and a silent character. Peggy is largely silent. I don't want or need her to say what I would say, but she should be saying something.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:56 (sixteen years ago)

Basically your point is going to be whittled to death, Melissa, as people make a list of all the ways you could be wrong or misinterpreting. And most of them will be partly valid points, but also really convenient for sliding away from grokking how offensive the material is, to certain eyes.

The Lion's Mane Jellyfish, pictured here with its only natural predator (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:57 (sixteen years ago)

to power and his enjoyment of it

Typical of children of the Depression, just like spoiled hedonism is in some ways, the signature of the post-war generation. He gives up a lot of freedom to keep his grey-flannel life but it's worth it to him, one senses.

Is his love of his children at all a mitigating circumstance wrt to Draper?

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:57 (sixteen years ago)

sliding away from grokking how offensive the material is

I think it's generally offensive, Laurel. I think Melissa (please correct me if I'm wrong) finds it lacks real versimilitude.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:59 (sixteen years ago)

And that rather pointed lack is, itself, offensive, MW.

The Lion's Mane Jellyfish, pictured here with its only natural predator (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 17:59 (sixteen years ago)

I understand her point of view but do not share it, is all I am saying. For all its many flaws, it's still a show that engages me and which I often watch more than once for its subtle depths.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:02 (sixteen years ago)

Also, ILX is a bunch of pretty aware, pretty intelligent people (men almost exclusively in this thread) minutely deconstructing this show and still ending up justifying it and its portrayals, even if not for unconflicted reasons. How much more unquestioning is the approval of more "normal" folk who like the show? That would really steam me, and is probably one of the reasons I haven't even tried it out, even though aesthetically I'm probably part of the target demographic.

The Lion's Mane Jellyfish, pictured here with its only natural predator (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:03 (sixteen years ago)

nb laurel will be playing the part of momus in this clusterfuck

goth casual, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:05 (sixteen years ago)

its a show abt a miserable environment - the characters are generally confused and degraded - if one took the show to be an endorsement of that world itd be quite insulting - but its not

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:06 (sixteen years ago)

*Bows*

Thank you, Madame, for the compliment. ;)

I cannot be responsible for every idiot's reaction to a work of art or entertainment and I would be very loath to recommend to an artist that s/he self censor based on how 'normal' people might misconstrue things. We live in a country where end-of-life counselling has been twisted to mean 'let's euthanize grandma', after all.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:07 (sixteen years ago)

Also, I am exclusively 'man', Laurel. ;P

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:07 (sixteen years ago)

I think Melissa has a great point about what the show excludes, I just happen to think she's attributing all the wrong reasons for that exclusion and also disallowing any more complex relationship to the era other than simplistic disapproval.

Plus I think she has a pretty wrongheaded view of the major characters and that really hurts her argument.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:08 (sixteen years ago)

melissa art doesnt have to be realistic to be good - generally its better if its not - people surely never spoke the way they do in dostoevsky - sunflowers dont look the way van gogh painted them - and sarah im sure is not at all an accurate accounting of bob dylans marriage - but it doesnt mean that those works dont have depth - they have incredible insight - and in fact its their stylized forms which allow the brilliance to shine through

But you're talking about style vs. realism and I'm talking about content. I don't care if the show has some flowery fucking monologues or colors brighter than normal. For me realism is about capturing, idk, the "spirit" of something. I feel like a lack of angry, self-aware women or poc is an actively offensive omission that has the effect of really making the '60s seem like a different animal than they actually were. I think that choosing to tell Peggy's story the way they did does a disservice to the women she's supposed to represent by portraying her getting a job by saying a pun in front of a receptive guy, because I doubt that that was any woman's story then. These characters don't exist in a vacuum, nor do their stories.

x-post

And Laurel's got it exactly.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:08 (sixteen years ago)

mad men is abt the silent majority, deal

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:10 (sixteen years ago)

' "lol the '60s" in a way that I don't find particularly clever or funny'
I dunno about clever but oblivious smoking pregnant ladies and dumping garbage on parksites is pretty lolarious, at least the way they did it (matter-of-fact, unwinking). I guess Back to the Future has the opposite approach and makes it work, though. Is it so wrong to render simplistic disapproval in these respects?

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:11 (sixteen years ago)

should be mentioned were still in the early 60s here too

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:11 (sixteen years ago)

there was a vanguard of the changes to come - but it wasnt v big

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:12 (sixteen years ago)

Because there was no build-up of discontent or anything!

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:12 (sixteen years ago)

I think it only seemed "not very big" to outsiders.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)

I wish we could get the writers (again, predominately women) of this show in some kind of town hall debate with Melissa, because it would probably be really interesting (AND lolarious)

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)

(and, randomly, and not anything to do with anything I've said on this thread so far, I think Pete is going to kill Ken Cosgrove this season. Shove him down a flight of stairs and pretend it was an accident or something.)

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:14 (sixteen years ago)

Predominantly white women, and women aren't somehow magically immune to internalized misogyny.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:15 (sixteen years ago)

yes I know that but somehow I don't think they would respond well to such accusations or take them lightly

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:16 (sixteen years ago)

I wish we could get the writers (again, predominately women)

Nooooooo!!!! IT'S A TRAP!!!!

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:16 (sixteen years ago)

like has anyone ever called you a self-hating POC or whatever (I've definitely gotten the "you are a self-hating Jew" argument and let me tell you it is deeply, deeply insulting and aggravating and infuriating)

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:16 (sixteen years ago)

Haha, Mad Men (not Titanic like Tom Kenny says) is Star Wars for girls.

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:17 (sixteen years ago)

I think it only seemed "not very big" to outsiders.

― Melissa W, Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:13 PM (56 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

u mean like the people on the show all 15 of them - maybe there could be one each representing a different aspect of the human experience - they could live inside an orb w/the word "america???" painted on the outside - one of them could be your cousin - one of them is scott baio - itd be the perfect show in a lot of ways

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:17 (sixteen years ago)

actively offensive omission that has the effect of really making the '60s seem like a different animal than they actually were

I disagree, in as much as this is about the advertising world in the early 60's. I'm more inclined to believe that there were quite a few 'tony' agencies where POC, women, Jews, etc... were personae non gratae and whatever (I doubt that that was any woman's story then) I think about Peggy, her story doesn't seem incredible to me. My neighbors are in advertising and they both think the office dynamics are credible.

Whatever I may think of the sins of the past, I also do not think it wise or very artistic to only condemn. I'm not saying tout comprendre, c'est tout pardonner but I feel like you're looking to be offended, Melissa, at some ideological level as opposed to judging it on its own merits.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:17 (sixteen years ago)

http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/images/WK-AQ741_madmen_G_20090804172447.jpg

goth casual, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:20 (sixteen years ago)

^^not necessarily laughing at yr grandpa

goth casual, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:21 (sixteen years ago)

i don't know i think it's a little weird how a show that is explicitly a sardonic chronicle of abusive white-male-power in decay and decline is being criticized as if it were a celebration of that power. i mean, i don't think it's a genius sardonic-chronicle-of, and of course trafficking in the characters and types it traffics in leaves it open to having-it-both-ways critiques, but its p.o.v. is decidedly and clearly not on the moral side of don draper (much less roger sterling). so i just think a lot of the complaints here are off the mark.

i liked in this episode that don was still womanizing, even if more reluctantly, while betty's home pregnant -- it was a conscious choice not to make him more likable, not to let you get on his side.

flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:24 (sixteen years ago)

melissa is right imo

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:25 (sixteen years ago)

i don't really have the time to get into this at clusterfuck pace but i just thought i'd mention that /:

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:26 (sixteen years ago)

noted?

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:27 (sixteen years ago)

In the same way Back to the Future became Reagan's favorite movie, I could see the nostalgia and fashion and such seducing a Sarah Palin, never mind any embedded critique.

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:27 (sixteen years ago)

i don't know i think it's a little weird how a show that is explicitly a sardonic chronicle of abusive white-male-power in decay and decline is being criticized as if it were a celebration of that power. i mean, i don't think it's a genius sardonic-chronicle-of, and of course trafficking in the characters and types it traffics in leaves it open to having-it-both-ways critiques, but its p.o.v. is decidedly and clearly not on the moral side of don draper (much less roger sterling). so i just think a lot of the complaints here are off the mark.

But it doesn't have to be a celebration of that power to be problematic. And just showing the feudal lords eating grapes without showing the serfs is pretty fucking problematic.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:27 (sixteen years ago)

WHY WHY WHY does the show have to represent both sides of the coin? WHY?

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:29 (sixteen years ago)

I don't really agree at all with Melissa's criticism of the female characters on this show, but like I think that article about their avoidance of race issues was pretty fair and I can def see not being able to get into it/just being totally put off as a result. By the way I thought people were not quite as kneejerk dismissive and defensive re criticism in this vein in the comments section where I first encountered that article. on ONTD!!!

A B C, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:29 (sixteen years ago)

I'd be hard pressed to think of one moment of this show that evinces, in terms of the drama and plot rather than setting, any positive aspect at all of the culture its exposing. All the pretty window dressing is, you know, ironic.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:30 (sixteen years ago)

WHY WHY WHY shouldn't it? WHY? Give me a really good reason, seriously.

x-posts

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:30 (sixteen years ago)

hopefully Mad Serfs will be the AfterMASH-style follow up series

some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:30 (sixteen years ago)

I'm sure there's an aspect of 'the kids will lol at how fcuked up people were' in the writing, as Philip Nunez points out but I think the show's weakenss is not in that it looks like a Cheever-esque short story, but it's in the relative shallowness of the characters and close they veer toward caricatures. Depending on the sophitication of ones audience, however, sometimes you have to make use of stereotypes and borad strokes to get your point across. Sterling is pretty-one dimensional. Cooper is a Randian stereotype par excellence. Paul is mostly, too; trying to be hip but well-employed, pipe smoking beardo who is not above jealousy at another's writing success. Joan is the looking-for-a-husband-to get-me-out-of-here bombshell who uses the age-old skills of seduction to survive and even, in some way, dominate the office. She's a du Barry of sorts. Peggy's a nice quiet Irish Catholic girl trying to earn a living and, at first, remain a good girl. This is hardly original stuff, but then, maybe that's the point, too. I mean this is a place that suffers a completely spoiled brat like Pete for his social connections. I know this still exists, but it's pretty funny in this context such as when Campbell condescends to his new British boss (who might know a thing or two about class stratification) that he hasn't been 'hospitable' enough. LOL!

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:31 (sixteen years ago)

just showing the feudal lords eating grapes without showing the serfs is pretty fucking problematic.

― Melissa W, Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:27 PM (25 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

its art not a fact finding mission - if yr criteria were applied to the whole world itd be a pretty boring place - much like this thread over the last few hours

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:31 (sixteen years ago)

Because the narrative doesn't beg the question, like, ever. Like has been stated about 1000 times in this thread so far, it's a show about the insular world of privilege on Madison Ave and suburbia at the dawn of the 60s. It's not even looking downward at the oppressed masses. It's not concerned with them one way or the other. xxxp

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:32 (sixteen years ago)

i like Melissa's idea actually -- every scene ends w/ one of the rich whities saying "I wonder what the poor people are doing right now?" then a cut to what the poor people were doing right then

some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:32 (sixteen years ago)

oh ffs

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:33 (sixteen years ago)

eatin beans most likely - lol f'n poors

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:33 (sixteen years ago)

Oh, sorry Melissa apparently didn't get my memo that women on ILX should remember not to be too boring when critiquing gendered issues. Bottle opener thread much more entertaining.

The Lion's Mane Jellyfish, pictured here with its only natural predator (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:34 (sixteen years ago)

"All the pretty window dressing is, you know, ironic."
Right-wingers are pretty adept at co-opting/championing objects of liberal ridicule, e.g. Archie Bunker, Alex Keaton.
Isn't Draper's idol Richard Nixon?

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:34 (sixteen years ago)

Basically Melissa, it seems like you were the target audience for American Dreams and not Mad Men so... take that under advisement, I guess.

Batsman (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:34 (sixteen years ago)

u wrote a memo abt that - seems strangely out of character - cc me ok

xp

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:35 (sixteen years ago)

Isn't the "serfs" exclusion so painfully obvious and on the periphery at all times!? I just don't get that point at all because that pointed exclusions seems to me to be the dramatic tension the whole show is built on. There's all kinds of shit going down outside that office that we ALL know about

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:35 (sixteen years ago)

And just showing the feudal lords eating grapes without showing the serfs is pretty fucking problematic.

Go ahead and subjugate art to ideology but don't expect me to follow. This is patently, early 20th century-level bullshit. By all means, show the superstructure of society, etc, but to say that one couldn't tell a story of human existence that dealt primarily, almost exclusively, with black women in the South, that I HAD to show the wealthy white people and had to show them in 'their' element, would not only sound a little patronizing, but it would force upon the narrative a knowledge that its protagonists wouldn't necessarily have. This way lies bad art.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:35 (sixteen years ago)

p'haps one thing — ppl saying 'it shouldn't have to because it's not the job of this show to be realistic and all-inclusive' (which is a fair enough argt) — i think a lot of the moments where the show goes look we're doing the misogyny thing now, characters start acting or being acted very differently because they're in one of the on-topic episodes — the episode of roger 'hitting on' betty is the sort of thing i'm talking about.

also lol at "why not complain about there being no mention of Vietnam, or immigrants, or rock music" — like they're not bloody gonna

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:37 (sixteen years ago)

yeah -- i mean i have nothing against shows like The Wire that try to show every side of every story line at all times -- but most shows are not like that. most shows have a particular set of characters in a particular setting and you generally get their story, not all the parallels and flipsides that may or may not be happening at the same time.

some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:37 (sixteen years ago)

Go ahead and subjugate art to ideology but don't expect me to follow.

^^^this

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:37 (sixteen years ago)

If you think that the only two sides of the coin could be "after school special" and "Mad Men" I don't even know what to tell you. Seriously? If Mad Men portrayed anything other than white men it would suddenly turn into an NBC teenage drama?

It has to be about exactly what it's about with no modifications or it won't be ~art~, the poor show. :(

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:37 (sixteen years ago)

maybe they'll introduce more non-white characters later on to reflect cultural changes in later years. the show's only a couple years into its run.

some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:38 (sixteen years ago)

xpost to myself: well, two of them at least.

(I mean, they've already mentioned 'rock music', sorta; I reckon this year must have one episode called 'The British Invasion' ready to go (IT WILL BE CLEVER AND MULTILAYERED); Vietnam isn't really a part of public consciousness at this point, it's just Kennedy's 'advisors' — no draft yet)

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:39 (sixteen years ago)

If Mad Men portrayed anything other than white men

ARRRGH it DOES portray things other than white men (WOMEN), and this willful obfuscation of the the text sooooo does not help your argument.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:39 (sixteen years ago)

It has to be about exactly what it's about with no modifications or it won't be ~art~, the poor show. :(

― Melissa W, Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:37 PM (31 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

they should totally let u give notes - i bet itd be way better

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

guys is the black kid in captain planet a case of 'subjugating art to ideology'

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

It has to be about exactly what it's about with no modifications or it won't be ~art~, the poor show. :(

Welcome to every television series ever.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

I mean you've done this over and over on this thread already - you gloss over inconvenient content when it suits your ideologically driven argument.

x-posts

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

breaking bad is better than mad men

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

no sry

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:41 (sixteen years ago)

thomp roger hitting on betty is the essence of his character. it's roger thru & thru just slightly less hilarious, what are you on about

goth casual, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:41 (sixteen years ago)

its really good but

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:41 (sixteen years ago)

I think the larger point is that no matter what you decide to show you will ALWAYS exclude something. Always. This is axiomatic. Your ideal for this show would leave out something too.

There are politically responsible ways to acknowledge these exclusions, to hint at what's left out. And that's always all you can do. I think mad men does this beautifully.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:42 (sixteen years ago)

ice cr?m — it's that it's done in a spirit of "this is the episode where roger hitting on women isn't hilarious"

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:42 (sixteen years ago)

Go ahead and subjugate art to ideology but don't expect me to follow. This is patently, early 20th century-level bullshit. By all means, show the superstructure of society, etc, but to say that one couldn't tell a story of human existence that dealt primarily, almost exclusively, with black women in the South, that I HAD to show the wealthy white people and had to show them in 'their' element, would not only sound a little patronizing, but it would force upon the narrative a knowledge that its protagonists wouldn't necessarily have. This way lies bad art.

Yeah, I hate that there are so many shows exclusively about black women in the South too. Thankfully we have Mad Men now and hopefully soon other television shows will follow their brave lead.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:43 (sixteen years ago)

eh so anyway how abt the pete v ken set up - who u all see winning out - will one of petes devious plots actually work this time - they have to fire the loser right

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:44 (sixteen years ago)

There are politically responsible ways to acknowledge these exclusions, to hint at what's left out. And that's always all you can do. I think mad men does this beautifully.

see at this point this is a thread where a dozen men lecture one woman about this point which err

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:45 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, I hate that there are so many shows exclusively about black women in the South too

is your complaint that these shows are on WB/UPN, BET, etc and not AMC?

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:45 (sixteen years ago)

roger hitting on women is always kinda pathetic--the hilari-o-meter rises & dips constantly--it's this weft & weave in the texture of the show you & melissa are missing.

goth casual, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:45 (sixteen years ago)

ice cr?m — it's that it's done in a spirit of "this is the episode where roger hitting on women isn't hilarious"

― thomp, Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:42 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yr thinking of some other poster - but yeah sometimes hitting on women is hilarious sometimes its not - sry abt the complexities of life - theres really nothing i can do abt it

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:45 (sixteen years ago)

But she brought this complaint to the table. Nobody chased her down. xxxp

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:45 (sixteen years ago)

not going to dive too deeply into this argument since I really don't care one way or the other about "Mad Men" but hearing all the praise about the show and then watching the first few episodes of the first season recently for the first time did give me "wow white people really miss racism and sexism" moment

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:46 (sixteen years ago)

strong burn xp

Batsman (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:46 (sixteen years ago)

yr thinking of some other poster

yes sorry, i was looking at goth casual's post above yrs. a+ zing tho well done

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:46 (sixteen years ago)

ARRRGH it DOES portray things other than white men (WOMEN), and this willful obfuscation of the the text sooooo does not help your argument.

OH FUCK, RUMBLED! Oh wait, no. First, that should say "(WHITE WOMEN)", and then you would have to acknowledge precisely why I've argued that it is nevertheless not a show ABOUT women. Even aside from my issues with HOW they are written, they don't really form the backbone of the show and the show not only barely lets them talk to EACH OTHER, it barely lets them talk period.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

see at this point this is a thread where a dozen men lecture one woman about this point which err

― thomp, Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:45 PM (27 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

if a woman presents a facile argument in a forest of men

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

hey don't really form the backbone of the show

this is totally wrong - Betty and Peggy are as much central characters as any of the male leads

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)

not going to dive too deeply into this argument since I really don't care one way or the other about "Mad Men" but hearing all the praise about the show and then watching the first few episodes of the first season recently for the first time did give me "wow white people really miss racism and sexism" moment

― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Tuesday, August 18, 2009 2:46 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

if there was like one non white fan out there (i know i know lol yeah right) what u think their motivation would be - and btw if youre going to bring sexism into it yr taget really shouldve been white men - step up yr casual snipe game dang perry

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:50 (sixteen years ago)

eh so anyway how abt the pete v ken set up - who u all see winning out - will one of petes devious plots actually work this time - they have to fire the loser right

Ken's gonna get wooed away to another agency, or start getting more short stories published. Pete will get what he wants, but it will be a hollow victory.

Jaq, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:50 (sixteen years ago)

so does anyone here read dykes 2 watch out 4?

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:50 (sixteen years ago)

is your complaint that these shows are on WB/UPN, BET, etc and not AMC?

WB/UPN don't exist anymore. And I wasn't aware that BET has suddenly gained a critically-acclaimed drama about black women in the South (protip: it hasn't).

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)

Laurel, I appreciate Melissa's critique and found it interesting. Just because I and other male posters on this thread don't agree with it doesn't amount to ILX marginalizing women's voices. Also, your support of her would be a lot more forceful if you'd actually, you know, seen the show.

jaymc, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)

so does anyone here read dykes 2 watch out 4?

Yeah, Mad Men doesn't even remotely pass the Bechdel test.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)

I'm not critiquing the critique of the show, I'm just seeing this thread going exactly like ILX often does.

The Lion's Mane Jellyfish, pictured here with its only natural predator (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)

I only saw the first three episodes, but that's patently false. It does pass the Bechdel test.

Mordy, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)

'girlfriends' made syndication, we're all on an even playing field now

A B C, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)

Even though it'd be interesting to see Star Wars delve into the welfare of the Empire's conscripted labor like Kevin Smith wants it to, I think that would alter the character of the franchise to where it isn't Star Wars. Likewise Mad Men's minorities being kept in the periphery is essential to its character. They could have made the black elevator operator roll his eyes more, but that makes him proxy for the audience instead of being in the fabric of the show.

re: WB/UPN, I saw Brewster's Millions broadcast under the aegis of UPN's "Great Black Achievements Cinema" or some such.

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)

xposts, haha well done mordy and melissa

In Dykes to watch out for there's a character who will only watch a movie if it fits the following requirements —

1 It has to have at least two women in it,
2 Who talk to each other
3 About something besides men —

Mad Men sort of very occasionally scales this dizzying heights with a twenty second zing exchange between Joan and Peggy or something but that's about it

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:55 (sixteen years ago)

lolz better that than the Toy amirite

Pryor's films are all pretty sad, with a few really amazing exceptions (Blue Collar!)

thread derail x-post

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:55 (sixteen years ago)

I'm trying to recall if it's ever been able to clear #3's bar.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:56 (sixteen years ago)

i think upn is called pix now

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:56 (sixteen years ago)

does talking about children count cuz if so Betty and her neighbor on more than one occasion

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:56 (sixteen years ago)

Also, lol that Mad Men isn't Far From Heaven.

Mordy, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:57 (sixteen years ago)

joan and peggy talked abt how peggys secretary sux just this last ep - im sure pretty much ever ep has something that clears that bar since the characters talk abt work so much

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:58 (sixteen years ago)

haha that conversation was so not "not about men"

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:58 (sixteen years ago)

"what's it like having that engagement ring, btw it sucks how much time my secretary spends flirting with that one guy"

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 18:59 (sixteen years ago)

Peggy talking to her mom and sister about not wanting to go to church

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:00 (sixteen years ago)

so any conversation were anything man related comes up is off limits - sry didnt read the fine print

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:00 (sixteen years ago)

just showing the feudal lords eating grapes without showing the serfs is pretty fucking problematic.

i think this is a mischaracterization of the show, but i don't even agree with it as a general statement. (of course, i also liked marie antoinette...)

flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:01 (sixteen years ago)

no ok mad men has managed to pass these worryingly strict rules on "more than one occasion", it is all gravy

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:01 (sixteen years ago)

"i don't know i think it's a little weird how a show that is explicitly a sardonic chronicle of abusive white-male-power in decay and decline is being criticized as if it were a celebration of that power"

bcz it is, also, a celebration of that power? bcz the aesthetic gorgeousness of this world of abusive white-male-power can distract from the abusive part? i mean genuinely if you believe people don't watch that and go "well gee say what you like about institutionalised sexism but those office girls are sex-y" then-- well, then look at even feminist sites like jezebel which have already forgotten the whole "these women are wearing immensely uncomfortable girdles and such" point and are instead talking about how the show's policy on "authentic" sixties body shapes, that forbids the actors from modern-style gym use, is-- empowering, i guess.

la belle dame sans serif (c sharp major), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:01 (sixteen years ago)

Peggy's sister talks to Peggy's mom about how much she resents Peggy every time either one of them is in an episode.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:01 (sixteen years ago)

(one day i will learn the which/that rule but it is not this day.)

la belle dame sans serif (c sharp major), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:02 (sixteen years ago)

(although, that we can isolate these instances from memory is a little telling...)

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:03 (sixteen years ago)

Joan: Lois, may I speak with you? Theresa said there was an incident yesterday? You were crying in the break room, which I have specifically forbidden.
Lois: I'm sorry, but Peggy ...
Joan: Miss Olson?
Lois: She yelled at me.
Joan: Why would she do that?
Lois: [Nervous pause] I'm good at my job!
Joan: Next time you come to complain ...
Lois: [Almost through tears] I wasn't complaining! You wanted to talk to me.
Joan: This is why I don't allow crying in the break room. It erodes morale. There's a place to do that, like your apartment. And I would correct your attitude towards Miss Olson. It's unbecoming.

jaymc, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:03 (sixteen years ago)

def nothing should ever be sexy unless its like totally wholesome and approved by the this doesnt make me feel weird board

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:04 (sixteen years ago)

def nothing problematic should ever be pointed out cos that's like saying it shouldn't exist

la belle dame sans serif (c sharp major), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:05 (sixteen years ago)

def everything should be a problem

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:06 (sixteen years ago)

Divorced neighbor and Betty, talking about canvassing for Kennedy (possible exclusion due to Kennedy=man?), talking about weird son camping out in playhouse (possible exclusion due to veer into "doesn't suck so much to be divorced from guy"?)

Horseback riding friend and Betty, talking about their daughters (excluded b/c "oh sad so fat she'll never get a man"?)

Jaq, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:07 (sixteen years ago)

I'll cop to thinking "born in the USA" was a super-patriotic anti-immigrant song for a long time re: problematic aesthetics overriding content/ironicity mistaken for sincerity.

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:08 (sixteen years ago)

Just for the record, I'd almost certainly watch the show Melissa's arguing in favor of. Mad Men is not that show, though, yet I enjoy watching it all the same.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:09 (sixteen years ago)

bcz the aesthetic gorgeousness of this world of abusive white-male-power can distract from the abusive part?

conflict and contrast are at the heart of all great art. thus evil is more interesting if it is made attractive, etc. if a piece becomes guided entirely by prescribed rules, it becomes bad, because it is no longer interesting - there is nothing to dissect or engage or tease out.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:10 (sixteen years ago)

(I imagine Oscar Wilde has something relevant to say on this subject....)

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:11 (sixteen years ago)

Possibly relevant quote from Matthew Weiner:

I'm really interested, after doing this show for a while... in looking at how little history actually does impact our lives. GM declared bankruptcy eight weeks ago. For all we know, when our children are reading the history books, that'll be the turning point for the economy, good or bad. But we don't know that, because we're in it. You have no idea when you hear Martin Luther King that this is going to be everything. It's fascinating to look at the newspapers and see, "They ignored this, they dwelled on that."

jaymc, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:12 (sixteen years ago)

That's a pretty privileged view of history.

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:22 (sixteen years ago)

I think the criticisms leveled at the show on this thread are to some extent and fair and useful because they point our attention to things that the show can't or won't point to itself. BUT i dont necessarily consider it a flaw of the show anymore than I would consider Moby Dick flawed because there are no woman characters. No work of art can be faithful to the universal range of experience. This is a stupid point but for some reason it seems to need to be made over and over post-ideological criticism.

It would also be easier to take those criticism if they weren't couched in a willful attempt to ignore or belittle any smidgen of complexity in the show itself.

ryan, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:23 (sixteen years ago)

applying the bechdel test to this show is ludicrous since it is explicitly presenting a world where nearly all acknowledged power is held by men, & is obv dramatically focused on how this power is corrosive of men's psyches & how women enable or subvert it in the ways offered by it's specific setting.

goth casual, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:23 (sixteen years ago)

I'm dying to know whose sockpuppet Melissa W is.

musically, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:24 (sixteen years ago)

the bechdel test it should be noted is pretty stupid and pointless

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)

haha i think mel posted here before any of us

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)

thom yorke's

goth casual, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:26 (sixteen years ago)

the bechdel test is all about refusing to engage, that is why i thought it was relevant ~

thomp, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:26 (sixteen years ago)

it's called mad men not happy ladies

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:26 (sixteen years ago)

haha i think mel posted here before any of us

Yes, she was among the original wave of posters back in the Greenspun days.

Try actually engaging with someone who disagrees with you as opposed to calling them a sockpuppet.

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:28 (sixteen years ago)

accusing someone of sockpuppetry is a long a storied ilx tradition

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)

hey melissa, can u tell us your feelings on gossip girl next?

tehresa, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:30 (sixteen years ago)

yeah I recognize Melissa from way back. don't be a dick.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:32 (sixteen years ago)

tehresa, is that a serious or sarcastic request?

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:32 (sixteen years ago)

both.

i'm female btw

tehresa, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:33 (sixteen years ago)

also xxxxxposts let us not forget the cw (which i believe is now home to girlfriends and THE GAME - omg rich self-centered african americans how come they don't show lower class african americans the NERVE oh wait it's bc kelsey grammar is exec producer).

tehresa, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:35 (sixteen years ago)

Are you 12?

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:38 (sixteen years ago)

great zing!

tehresa, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:38 (sixteen years ago)

way to be assholes, folks

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:40 (sixteen years ago)

o yr one to talk mr white people miss racism and ps sexism too

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:42 (sixteen years ago)

I just can't take you seriously if you're positing that the mere existence Girlfriends and The Game=WELCOME TO POST-RACIAL AMERICA!. And seriously, whatever, go on burning your straw-man of my views.

x-posts

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:42 (sixteen years ago)

listen, everything serves its own purpose. it's like when my friend got mad at me because i told her i was ok with the gates foundation not funding arts project. that's not their mission. many other people have put this well better than i can, but i just wanted to say i agree, as a woman, and that i am not offended by the way women are portrayed on the show.

tehresa, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:43 (sixteen years ago)

popcorn.gif

there is no there there (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:45 (sixteen years ago)

i am not saying that at all about girlfriends and the game and you really want to read what you want into my and everyone else's posts, mad men, and probably every other bit of pop culture you encounter, so there's probably not much anyone can do to change your mind or your experience but really i just feel bad because you're prohibiting yourself from enjoying the well-crafted parts of this show because your agenda blinds you from seeing them.

tehresa, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:45 (sixteen years ago)

hahaha please tell me you aren't taking that comment as a scathing indictment of everyone who has ever said anything positive about "Mad Men", because that would be really defensive and kind of dumb

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:45 (sixteen years ago)

mad men is a feeling

cozwn, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:46 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.derailingfordummies.com/#sensitive
http://www.derailingfordummies.com/#enjoyit

x-posts

Melissa W, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:46 (sixteen years ago)

After the 10th diatribe about why a show specifically about privileged white people and an industry full of privileged white people is somehow making a mistake by not going out of its way to explore every other race/class group of the early 60s, I was inclined to call her a moron but I thought calling her a sockpuppet was a more polite way to say so.

musically, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:47 (sixteen years ago)

http://madmenfordummies.com/notabtlol60s

cozwn, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:47 (sixteen years ago)

hahaha please tell me you aren't taking that comment as a scathing indictment of everyone who has ever said anything positive about "Mad Men", because that would be really defensive and kind of dumb

― nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Tuesday, August 18, 2009 3:45 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

o so now yr calling me dumb huh

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:47 (sixteen years ago)

musically OTM

some dude, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:48 (sixteen years ago)

yeah, a few hundred posts later let's call me out on derailing techniques.
well done.

xpost

tehresa, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:49 (sixteen years ago)

jesus some freshman year shit happenin up itt

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:50 (sixteen years ago)

see, this is why any discussion of med men that isn't about christina hendricks' boobies is bound to fail

velko, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:50 (sixteen years ago)

hahahaha

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:50 (sixteen years ago)

tza i hope that you've learned that it's ok to make strawman arguments if you cite them at derailingfordummies.com

there is no there there (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:51 (sixteen years ago)

and to think i was concerned that reading this "discussion" would result in accidentally reading spoilers!

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:51 (sixteen years ago)

i guess you could say i have been schooled.

more boobies, please.

tehresa, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:52 (sixteen years ago)

http://fuckyeahchristinahendricks.tumblr.com/

Batsman (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)

also re: my comment pre-season premiere about hendricks being forced to lose weight, i think those photos were just heavily shopped bc she looked healthy and curvaceous as ever on sunday night :)

tehresa, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:54 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, I hate that there are so many shows exclusively about black women in the South too. Thankfully we have Mad Men now and hopefully soon other television shows will follow their brave lead.

This is a perfectly good critique of tv programming but not of 'Mad Men'. "I don't like it 'cause it's not the show I wanted to see." ?!

My problem with this line of argument is that it's destructive not constructive and by what is coming close to being an insistence on relative moral valence, the plight of women or minorities in the US, should by rights in a show about the early 60's, be about the effect of advertising on Africans and Asians and South Americans struggling to get out from under colonial oppression or dictatorships or economic stagnation. All the glitz and fun aside, the only thing that makes this show justifiable, as several have pointed out, is how it shows the slow but steady erosion of the era's elite's hold on power and legitimacy and hopefully, if they don't follow in the footsteps of 'Sex in the City' and 'The Sopranos' and drag this out to 1984, or something, they'll end this in the late 60's, by when dinosaurs like Slattery and Draper will either have adapted to a new advertising world or fallen by the wayside.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:54 (sixteen years ago)

Whoever said 1960 wasn't very far behind us was otm. I'm leaving the boobies to the assholes.

The Lion's Mane Jellyfish, pictured here with its only natural predator (Laurel), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:54 (sixteen years ago)

hottt

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)

I rather like the way Joan runs a mtg, btw.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:55 (sixteen years ago)

to further m. white's point, i do think they are putting in the effort to set up that late 60s situation. for example, the chat about the mojave airlines campaign was so un-pc and offensive that you realize this is going to end up hindering the agency's progress at some point.

tehresa, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 19:58 (sixteen years ago)

http://catmacros.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/serious_cat.jpg

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:00 (sixteen years ago)

id rather like to see the way joan runs btw

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:01 (sixteen years ago)

wd probably involve boobies

cozwn, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:02 (sixteen years ago)

I am convinced I saw Hendricks in SF not long after the first season started (she was in town for soething or other). Needless to say, she looked nothing like Joan, but was very, very fetching nonetheless.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:03 (sixteen years ago)

if they don't follow in the footsteps of 'Sex in the City' and 'The Sopranos' and drag this out to 1984, or something, they'll end this in the late 60's

Weiner has said that he can't imagine doing the show more than 5 or 6 more years and that he wants it to end at the end of the decade.

jaymc, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:06 (sixteen years ago)

That's good to hear.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:07 (sixteen years ago)

they should at the v least give us a flash forward w/hoverboards n stuff

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:08 (sixteen years ago)

don draper in a piano tie

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:08 (sixteen years ago)

new wave ken cosgrove

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:09 (sixteen years ago)

Oh, c'mon, what could match Don Draper at Studio 54?

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:09 (sixteen years ago)

o maaaaan yes

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:10 (sixteen years ago)

Cocaine, hookers, heartattack...

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:10 (sixteen years ago)

leisure suits

i have the new brutal truth if you want it (latebloomer), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:11 (sixteen years ago)

Studio 54 would be about 18 years later, right? Don probably wouldn't even get in. Old & square.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:11 (sixteen years ago)

disco don

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:12 (sixteen years ago)

I heard somewhere that hendricks is married to that snozberries dude who was on lsd in super troopers btw

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:12 (sixteen years ago)

series ends with giant brown acid orgy at woodstock.

tehresa, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:12 (sixteen years ago)

His luxurious greying chest hair sprouting out from a hilariously wide collared shirt undone three or more buttons from the neck.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)

srsly, 1969. it works. think about it.
xpost

tehresa, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)

the snozberries taste like snozberries

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:13 (sixteen years ago)

“What I always wanted to do,” he said in a phone interview from his office in Los Angeles, “is to take this classic American archetype of the late 1950s, with all the trappings of that time, and see how he ends up in 1970 or ’72.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/09/arts/television/09kapl.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&ref=arts

just sayin, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:15 (sixteen years ago)

Studio 54 would be about 18 years later, right? Don probably wouldn't even get in. Old & square.

There were definitely people in the 50's in Studio 54 and given Don's aspirations, I imagine he would try like hell to fit in.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:15 (sixteen years ago)

or he could just time travel or whatever

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:17 (sixteen years ago)

Don's behavior will surely catch up with him before the series ends, don't we think? And not just a broken family, but a long, hard and painful fall.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:18 (sixteen years ago)

im thinking his career flourishes while his personal/internal life degrades

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:19 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, he'll be some older, divorced creep perving on all the ladies at the disco

xpost

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:19 (sixteen years ago)

“What I always wanted to do,” he said in a phone interview from his office in Los Angeles, “is to take this classic American archetype of the late 1950s, with all the trappings of that time, and see how he ends up in 1970 or ’72.”

sry dude you were beat to the punch

http://i.biblio.com/z/569/464/9780345464569.jpg

jaymc, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:20 (sixteen years ago)

its what he wanted to do not what he wanted to do first before john updike

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:21 (sixteen years ago)

I see him hiking through Mongolia all by himself, crying on a hilltop and then blowing his brains out.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:22 (sixteen years ago)

(and then Journey plays)

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:22 (sixteen years ago)

but did he really kill himself or was he just scratching his ear (w/a gun)

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:23 (sixteen years ago)

maybe one of his kids are in some band that plays at CBGB's c. 1976

velko, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:25 (sixteen years ago)

definitely that little lesbo sally

tehresa, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:27 (sixteen years ago)

Sally = Lydia Lunch

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:27 (sixteen years ago)

appetite for destruction on that one

tehresa, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:28 (sixteen years ago)

lil lesbo lydia lunch

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:28 (sixteen years ago)

Well! Here comes ol' Lydia Lunch! Good ol' Lydia Lunch...yes, sir! Good ol' Lydia Lunch. How I hate him!

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 20:32 (sixteen years ago)

i think bert cooper should have ayn rand come in to give the office a pep talk. and then she seduces him under the hokusai.

flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 21:09 (sixteen years ago)

Hard to cast someone that repellent, though...

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 21:27 (sixteen years ago)

sigourney weaver

cozwn, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 21:36 (sixteen years ago)

it's called mad men not happy ladies

cozwn, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 21:43 (sixteen years ago)

lol @ some1 who apparently paid less attn to the actual show than shakey mo and a couple of ppl who havent even seen it ruining this thread

jveggra va pbqr (Lamp), Tuesday, 18 August 2009 21:46 (sixteen years ago)

http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/3024/kermiti.jpg

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 18 August 2009 21:55 (sixteen years ago)

yoww i go off for a day and come back to this clusterfuck. nice work, everyone. :/

just want to say that as a non-American, non-white, female born in the 80s who was raised in a country that is still very much struggling with sexism and racism, I find Mad Men to be a fascinating and well-made TV show about a very specific group of people in a very specific time and setting and i like its portrayal of both men and women.

might be repeating a lot of the points above, but I don't think the show is trying to capture the entire spirit of America in the 60s at all - at least not in the way I know and understand it to be (through a gazillion other American shows, films, music...). i suppose the show's trying to portray a once powerful part of the 60s that's now lost because of the monumental changes in that era - the show is nostalgic in that sense but it also understands that it's false nostalgia, that ultimately it's a good thing that people like don and roger and betty and joan are largely extinct now because of these other things going on on the outside that they, as privileged white men/women, are either entirely unaware of or are late to understand. in other words, i think the exclusion of other groups of people on the show is a very deliberate choice on the part of the writers/producers - the silence is deafening. these mad men/women have no idea.

i think mel's right to want and expect a show that also portrays the other side of the story, but Mad Men won't be that show and personally, I don't want it to be. i disagree that it's showing us something we've seen before countless of times simply because it has privileged white men and women as protagonists; imo it's the complete opposite -- it's sixties counter-culture narratives that have been done to death. we're already aware of the importance of those struggles and their consequences and THANK GOD for that, and indeed, a huge reason why the show is fascinating to me is just how much that knowledge colours our perceptions/opinions of its characters and their actions. it *expects* us to know that these characters and their stories don't exist in a vacuum, that none of these people are in any way representative of the decade or anyone apart from whomever they're portraying.

i suppose it would be nice to see the other side acknowledged or portrayed in a meaningful way on the show but i don't think it needs to be. the show's strength lies in the knowledge that we're following the trajectory of a group of people and a lifestyle/culture that's beautiful and seductive but poisonous and ultimately doomed. introducing a critique of that lifestlye within the show by way of contrast actually makes it seem a little less interesting to me when the characters are already doing a great job of that by destroying themselves.

Roz, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 00:45 (sixteen years ago)

h8 'the great gatsby' -- its all about the richies

butthurt (deej), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 03:08 (sixteen years ago)

so i seem to have missed most the arguing - but if the crux of someones point is that Mad Men is too much about upper-middle class white dudes - well i guess i can see someone not being able to get by that. but i never heard anyone complain that something like City of God had too many poor kids either.

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 03:29 (sixteen years ago)

*insert image of Grandpa Simpson writing Modern Bride to complain about it's lack of senior citizens*

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 03:32 (sixteen years ago)

which is even in itself sexist, because obviously the crusading feminist grandma simpson should have been the one to do this but those chauvinists at fox just wouldn't allow it.

ok i'm done i swear.

boobies!
http://www.nerve.com/CS/blogs/date-machine/ChristinaHendricks.jpg

tehresa, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 04:48 (sixteen years ago)

looks a bit like a wax dummy there

self-fufilling rofflecy (haitch), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 04:57 (sixteen years ago)

yeah pretty scary!

tehresa, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 04:59 (sixteen years ago)

tehresa aren't you brilliant? don't you feel proud of yourself? you are awesome, man.

Turangalila, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 05:25 (sixteen years ago)

you are in reality an ignorant cunt who needs to be lobotomized, btw.

Turangalila, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 05:25 (sixteen years ago)

my dear, try lightening up a little.

tehresa, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 05:27 (sixteen years ago)

Go to sleep, you're drunk. :(

x-post

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 05:27 (sixteen years ago)

I'm sorry.

Turangalila, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 05:28 (sixteen years ago)

to tehresa, that is. I shouldn't have said that and it was completely uncalled for, though I do think you're being needlessly glib. but I overreacted.

Turangalila, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 05:29 (sixteen years ago)

thinking about this some more, it seems like the complaints have less to do with the show than with the audience. or at least, have to do with a suspicion that both the creators of the show and the audience are secretly getting off on the fantasy depiction of White Male Privilege Land, under the guise of relishing in its downfall. or even, i guess, the critique again could be, "but what if it's both??" because obviously the drinking and smoking and everything look a lot more fun than your average 2009 workplace, so isn't it sort of disingenuous to pretend that the sexism and racial privilege don't look sort of fun too? and don't they, really, look sort of fun, no matter how ostensibly miserable the people occupying those positions are?

so, ok. i think those are all fair concerns. but i'd maybe suggest an alternative way to think about them. which is that, yes, power and privilege are attractive and seductive. under any guise. they are! that's why people want them. and our entertainments are always filled with depictions of rises and falls, the accumulation and desiccation of power, and as spectators we enjoy the rises as much as we enjoy the falls. which does, obviously (and deliberately), implicate us and our own desires in whatever bad acts we see pantomimed, whether by caesar or tony montana or don draper. it's an inherent part of the morality tale that our own morality is tested and teased and prodded along the way. but morality tales of any era have a place, and they function as more than just some disingenuous indulgence of illicit fantasies of power and privilege. they also set or reinforce the markers of the moment. and a big part of what mad men is doing (or trying to, however successfully) is delineate the places where we now draw lines that we didn't draw them before -- and provide some reminders of why and how those lines came to be there. and even though obviously the confluence of mad men and the obama era was unplanned, it is not exactly a coincidence that now is a sort of natural time for a consideration of the decline and fall of WASP male power, which is one of the main things mad men is really about.

flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 05:30 (sixteen years ago)

thinking about this some more, it seems like the complaints have less to do with the show than with the audience. or at least, have to do with a suspicion that both the creators of the show and the audience are secretly getting off on the fantasy depiction of White Male Privilege Land, under the guise of relishing in its downfall.

I suspect a fair amount of retrofitting/redacting occurredbetween season 1 and 2 as to me season 1 seemed to be nothing more than a card catalog of 1960 upscale Camelot iconography grafted onto a story straight out of Peyton Place. I think it's only within the past year (or when it won Emmys) that Matt Weiner has gone on about how his vision of the show has been something more sociological.

Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 06:28 (sixteen years ago)

i don't think so, it felt "sociological" to me from the start. (if somewhat obviously, as noted in my first post on this thread -- two years ago, good lord.)

flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 06:35 (sixteen years ago)

i'm not convinced don and roger, as types, vanish when everyone think they do — change the suits and the substances and you could tell a fairly similar story in the 80s

i think roz's post upthread is pretty good

i suppose it would be nice to see the other side acknowledged or portrayed in a meaningful way on the show but i don't think it needs to be. the show's strength lies in the knowledge that we're following the trajectory of a group of people and a lifestyle/culture that's beautiful and seductive but poisonous and ultimately doomed. introducing a critique of that lifestlye within the show by way of contrast actually makes it seem a little less interesting to me when the characters are already doing a great job of that by destroying themselves.

my real problem with the show (which i find compelling and often pretty good despite this) is that the show's shifts between modes — a nostalgia in which the flaws of the era are funny, another in which they're 'sad' mb, and a sort of blank perception of them as horrifying — often come with a wrenching of gears — what i said about roger's behaviour earlier, the episode where he hits on betty being the one where it isn't funny, is what i mean, i guess. that the show often makes stuff funny and then when it's sad or horrifying it carries the whiff of the Very Special Episode.

thomp, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 10:33 (sixteen years ago)

yeah you're right, the archetypes never really go away do they? i guess what does change is society's expectations of how those same types are supposed to behave in their daily lives.

Roz, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 11:11 (sixteen years ago)

People seem to be forgetting Paul's scene on the bus to the South, which was amazing.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 11:59 (sixteen years ago)

haha that scene is great

but it's telling that you have one character joining in the freedom rides or w/eva and another flying to cali to schtup some eurotrash, and one of these is worth thirty seconds of screen time and one most of an episode

i'm not saying it's not a valid artistic decision on the creators' part to do so — i think the paul scene is a very shrewd admission of what they have to/have chosen to leave out, as a part of their format

but at the same time i can see why ppl would see this kind of thing and go: this show has some messed up priorities, how annoying (or, how boring) & maybe be bothered enough by it to think it was a failing

thomp, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 12:10 (sixteen years ago)

i think the messed up priorities accusation is bizarre, considering how critical of white privileged/educated middle class that scene is.

if julia stiles turns up preggers and homeless in San Fransisco, I'm tuning out.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:01 (sixteen years ago)

thinking about this some more, it seems like the complaints have less to do with the show than with the audience. or at least, have to do with a suspicion that both the creators of the show and the audience are secretly getting off on the fantasy depiction of White Male Privilege Land, under the guise of relishing in its downfall. or even, i guess, the critique again could be, "but what if it's both??" because obviously the drinking and smoking and everything look a lot more fun than your average 2009 workplace, so isn't it sort of disingenuous to pretend that the sexism and racial privilege don't look sort of fun too? and don't they, really, look sort of fun, no matter how ostensibly miserable the people occupying those positions are?

― flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, August 19, 2009 1:30 AM (7 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

this seems accurate as far as peoples concerns abt the show - and im sure there are some people who get off on it - but i just dont see how - they are all such miserable repressed fucks! their lives send shivers down my spine omg

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:02 (sixteen years ago)

you are in reality an ignorant cunt who needs to be lobotomized, btw.

― Turangalila, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 1:25 AM (7 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

and btw totally sb all the way

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:03 (sixteen years ago)

so no the mad men depiction of white male privileged does not look at all fun to me - except the rad clothes - it looks totally puke

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:05 (sixteen years ago)

this is a bit Sopranos glamourizes mob violence or there will never be an anti-war movie because the violence will always be thrilling.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:17 (sixteen years ago)

im sure there are some people who get off on it - but i just dont see how - they are all such miserable repressed fucks! their lives send shivers down my spine omg

Similarly, wouldn't most American males who love The Godfather like to be in the Corleone family? (I think this is part of why Coppola said he thought he didn't 'go far enough' in the first film.)

ha, xp

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:18 (sixteen years ago)

u can be fascinated w/something w/o endorsing it - theres a rubbernecking quality to it

and the mafia scene def has more pull - theyre so transgressive - mad mens privilege is quite restrained and unsatisfying in comparison

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:23 (sixteen years ago)

just showing the feudal lords eating grapes without showing the serfs is pretty fucking problematic

But this is just wrong though - even substituting the 'serfs' for 'angry, ambitious, self-aware women'. The whole point of the show is to show the feudal lords eating grapes in their own bubble without any awareness of what's happening outside it. What is left out of Mad Men is as important as what's left in and that's very consciously done - you miss big bits of the character's own stories, you don't see the angry ambitious women and the race riots and so forth, because the main characters don't see them and don't care about them. It's the implicit criticism of the Roger Sterlings and the Pete Campbells.

But at the same time, and this is I think where many people have a problem, is that Mad Men purposely stresses the glamorous, vicarious side. Most of these people are having a fucking horrible time but at the same time it looks on the surface to be so much fun - what wouldn't you give to disappear from your job for weeks to spend your time shagging around California and come back to be suddenly richer? It's about glamorising the bubble even when it's hollow and exclusionary and pretty miserable and oblivious to what's going on outside it. That's the whole point. That's advertising, that's capitalism.

Also whoever upthread said it's about what's coming that the characters know nothing about is OTM. Don Draper's actually an early example of that, he's not a feudal lord, he's a nobody and a fraud and the real feudal lords like Pete Campbell hate and resent him for it (ambition isn't always a virtue here, look at Pete). That's possibly why he's cool with Peggy and Salvatore. Sal actually can only get in by pretending he's something he's not.

The other thing to bear in mind is we're still very early in the 60s, there's a lot still to play out. If we don't see an angry ambitious woman rock up at SC at some point I'll be amazed.

Tuncay Stryder (Matt DC), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:35 (sixteen years ago)

so isn't it sort of disingenuous to pretend that the sexism and racial privilege don't look sort of fun too? and don't they, really, look sort of fun, no matter how ostensibly miserable the people occupying those positions are?

NO THEY DON'T LOOK FUN.

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:40 (sixteen years ago)

just showing the feudal lords eating grapes without showing the serfs is pretty fucking problematic

i don't really "get" mad men and haven't even finished the first season but my problem with this argument in general is that it seems to argue for a "dumbing down" of tv shows; i.e. it seems to be saying that people who make tv shows can never assume that viewers are intelligent enough to understand the social/historical context for the show unless they explicitly spell it out. it's a lose-lose situation: either the creators have the show explain the racial and sexual context of the time period for the people who aren't aware of it, making the show unwatchable for viewers who are aware of the context; or they assume that viewers are aware of the context and open themselves up to misinterpretation by less informed viewers. there are always going to be viewers who are too ignorant to understand the broader context, but saying the show has to cater to them seems equivalent to the arguments of parents who wanted to ban beavis & butthead or jackass because their kids were too dumb to figure out they shouldn't try and copy stuff from tv in real life.

congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:48 (sixteen years ago)

Of course it looks fun, sometimes. That's why people want to do it. There are parts in the The Wire, albeit fleetingly brief, where being a Baltimore drug dealer looks pretty fun. (xpost)

Tuncay Stryder (Matt DC), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:48 (sixteen years ago)

I mean, you can't address or criticise any kind of aspirational lifestyle without stressing why people might aspire to it at some point. It doesn't make any sense to just go "god isn't this awful?" without showing why the lifestyle is seductive.

Tuncay Stryder (Matt DC), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:50 (sixteen years ago)

sry--i actually don't want to oppress people. and i think i have a problem with anything claiming that i do?

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:50 (sixteen years ago)

So basically you are watching the show because of schadenfreude?

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:51 (sixteen years ago)

(that probably came across more aggressively than I meant it)

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:53 (sixteen years ago)

wanting to be like the characters is certainly not the only reason people would want to watch something

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:54 (sixteen years ago)

i mean i really enjoyed the hell out of district 9 but

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:54 (sixteen years ago)

ppl act like there are only 3 reasons to watch a show. i like that period of american history, i like the writing and acting, i like being entertained?

it is a drama series on tv not a sociopolitical exercise for me--not sure what else i can say.

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:57 (sixteen years ago)

it might be the only reason they'd go to a costume party in Times Square before the season premiere, however. xxp

http://blogs.amctv.com/mad-men/2009/08/times-square-premiere.php

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:58 (sixteen years ago)

people are def overstating the glamor of the mad men here - its just not that exulted of a situation - pete eampbell et al may try to play like theyre king shit but theyre just not - they come to the office everyday and deal w/annoying paranoid bullshit - and they enjoy the leisure activities of well off but not super rich people - its just not that great

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:59 (sixteen years ago)

the clothes are super rad xp

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:59 (sixteen years ago)

really the only thing they do in the show that i find attractive is drink on the job. oh, they dresser nicer too.

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 13:59 (sixteen years ago)

they also have christina hendricks work at their office

just sayin, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:00 (sixteen years ago)

shes really not v nice tho

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:02 (sixteen years ago)

just sayin that was a great moment for your username.

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:02 (sixteen years ago)

yeah i mean, by saying something "looks fun," i don't mean that it's something we (the audience) actually wants to do or identifies with. but that's the whole trope of the anti-hero, whether it's draper or al swearengen or stringer bell or whoever -- it sets up this tension between attraction and repulsion. i don't want to murder people and feed them to the pigs, but i still enjoyed watching al swearengen.

flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:03 (sixteen years ago)

yeah don draper is a good antihero but the to me the times where he is attractive are where he's coming up with cool ideas and kicking ass on the job, not the times when he's being an awful father and husband.

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:04 (sixteen years ago)

See I may be limited in my aptitude for enjoying those Draper qualities, cuz I think it's a stupid and evil job.

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:06 (sixteen years ago)

And if anyone's renowned for appreciating the exciting, seductive side of American capitalism it's definitely Dr Morbius.

Tuncay Stryder (Matt DC), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:08 (sixteen years ago)

don draper is def an antihero but like swearengen or bell it has more to do w/his personal charisma and mastery of his situation than his general socioeconomic spot on the totem pole - we vibe off draper but not pete campbell even tho they both enjoy the same early 60s white male privilege

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:10 (sixteen years ago)

the exciting, seductive side of American capitalism

hmmm, the second-most murderous global force of the 20th century, or the third? US, USSR, US, USSR.... Thank God for the Nazis, huh?

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:13 (sixteen years ago)

morbs dude why do you insist on being irrelevant to the conversation at hand 94/7

there is no there there (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:15 (sixteen years ago)

eh technically the soviets killed more than the nazis - it took a lot longer tho

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:16 (sixteen years ago)

So did the Chinese, fwiw.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:17 (sixteen years ago)

I think America might be #1 again, then! Booya!

Also, I do recognize the legit glamor appeal of lifestyle in Mad Men, Goodfellas, The Godfather etc. I also recognize that the juicy burger I had Sunday is probably what gave me the liquid shits for 2 days.

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:18 (sixteen years ago)

I also like that Draper, like much of his generation (ever had a grandparent who hoarded shit?) is a child of the Depression and I like that, while the show assumes we will be shocked yet titillated by the prevailing attitudes of the time, also asks us to consider where they were coming from, what informed their fears and aspirations.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:20 (sixteen years ago)

I cannot fathom how you arrive at that calculation, Morbs. From war-dead and genocide, the Nazis are definitely in contention, I'm reading about the purges and gulag system right now, and no amount of American wars or proxy war shit comes close to the death, just at home, that that system visited upon the peoples of the Soviet Union. The Great Leap Forward officially lead to the deaths of 14 millions but there are those who say it was between 20 and 40 million. Rag on American policy all you like but, "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion but not his own facts."

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:28 (sixteen years ago)

guys can we not?

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:31 (sixteen years ago)

So did the Chinese, fwiw.

read this as "so did the chinese ftw"

thomp, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:34 (sixteen years ago)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3033/2641794484_be70917184.jpg

Back to our regular programming, sorry.

She looks rather...frightening here, no?

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:35 (sixteen years ago)

the other biggest flaw of the show is how campy the depression sequences are

thomp, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:35 (sixteen years ago)

Like she's gamouring me with her bosoms which she will then use to suffocate me. Quelle belle mort!

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:36 (sixteen years ago)

MW, I may have been including the 19th century too, beg pardon. (Gen Turgidson's "20 million dead! Tops!" coming to mind) I leave now.

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:36 (sixteen years ago)

the other biggest flaw of the show is how campy the depression sequences are

This is not false.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:36 (sixteen years ago)

to be fair the depression was pretty campy - people living in tents and all - it was i understand also quite intense

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:39 (sixteen years ago)

See I may be limited in my aptitude for enjoying those Draper qualities, cuz I think it's a stupid and evil job.

this show hardly glorifies the advertising industry

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 14:42 (sixteen years ago)

i don't really "get" mad men and haven't even finished the first season but my problem with this argument in general is that it seems to argue for a "dumbing down" of tv shows; i.e. it seems to be saying that people who make tv shows can never assume that viewers are intelligent enough to understand the social/historical context for the show unless they explicitly spell it out. it's a lose-lose situation: either the creators have the show explain the racial and sexual context of the time period for the people who aren't aware of it, making the show unwatchable for viewers who are aware of the context; or they assume that viewers are aware of the context and open themselves up to misinterpretation by less informed viewers. there are always going to be viewers who are too ignorant to understand the broader context, but saying the show has to cater to them seems equivalent to the arguments of parents who wanted to ban beavis & butthead or jackass because their kids were too dumb to figure out they shouldn't try and copy stuff from tv in real life.

What I don't get about this is the idea that it would be "dumbing down" the show or that the only reason to show the stories I want to see is to "explicitly spell it out". I want to see race and sex addressed because to me the omission is glaring, but also because I would find it more entertaining. It stymies me that everyone is acting like that storyline would be boring or didactic or not worth telling. How would presenting that story make the show "unwatchable"? I would find it more interesting and more fun and far more watchable. I might even appreciate the other characters more if they had counter-balances and critics within the show.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:06 (sixteen years ago)

I think because a lot of us believe that sex and race are being addressed in an interesting way already, and the show you want to watch sounds like it would be hammering points home with the grace and subtlety of a novelty-sized mallet.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:11 (sixteen years ago)

that sounded harsh, i apologize. i really meant to say that there's a real danger of po-faced lecturing by tackling these issues straight on. that or it would devolve into cliché.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:12 (sixteen years ago)

I guess I just literally can't understand how having characters of color with lines and agency or one female character with vaguely proto-feminist leanings would suddenly turn the show into something "less subtle".

I'm not sure how the show could have been damaged by making Sheila an actual character with emotions and reactions that we are privy to, or by keeping Rachel on as a permanent fixture.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:16 (sixteen years ago)

because she wasn't a lead?

strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:17 (sixteen years ago)

o god make it stop plzzzzzzz

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:18 (sixteen years ago)

Are shows not written now? Do characters end up leads by accident or fate?

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:19 (sixteen years ago)

shockingly enough, like most long-form narrative television with roots in the traditional novelistic form, the show's got a couple of distinct points of view, and the other characters revolve around those points of view, despite the fleshing out work the writers do on the second string.

strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:19 (sixteen years ago)

melissa u had some points that were worthy of discussion - but plz stop saying the same thing ovr n ovr - shit

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:19 (sixteen years ago)

I guess I just literally can't understand how having characters of color with lines and agency or one female character with vaguely proto-feminist leanings would suddenly turn the show into something "less subtle".

If it feels like they're being forced onto the narrative because it would make you feel better or make it more interesting to you as opposed to being natural to the characters, it would fail.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:20 (sixteen years ago)

what this show needs is an aboriginal transsexual imo

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:21 (sixteen years ago)

i think as the show progresses you'll see what they've already started with peggy and salvatore---characters spinning off from don with "absent centers" or hidden pasts of their own--and perhaps with the coming social changes you'll see an increase in tension between the facades and the "reality."

ryan, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:22 (sixteen years ago)

I also think there is some proto-feminism in Joan and Peggy and Rachel. They may not meet the criteria for later full-fledged feminists but they are ambitious, talented and not push-overs.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:23 (sixteen years ago)

melissa i think the think you are ignoring is that mad men is a television show

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:23 (sixteen years ago)

*thing

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:23 (sixteen years ago)

Rachel and Midge served a very particular function for Don and the show, especially as a contrast to Betty. They also worked on a social commentary level (Midge and the beatniks, Rachel as a Jewish woman making it in a Man's World, as trite as that sounds).

The struggles of women are generally represented through the Peggy/Joan contrast as well as Betty (who contrasts with several others at different points, like the divorced woman down the road), and all three of them get significant screen time. You might not find the characters rich or interesting, which would be a failing of the show from your point of view, but I feel the weight of the sexism and misogyny through Joan and the desire (and cost) of ambition through Peggy (amongst many, many other things).

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:27 (sixteen years ago)

BECAUSE CHARACTERS OF COLOR LIVING IN NYC IN 1962 ARE EXACTLY LIKE ABORIGINAL TRANSSEXUALS, AMIRITE?

Maybe I'd stop responding if you'd stop saying ignorant, offensive, insulting shit. Look, I don't give a flying fuck that you think Mad Men is so much more interesting if it's just about the characters we have. I *do*, however, give a flying fuck if you keep implying that what I want is somehow nothing more than crazy-talk, like wanting something that would somehow actually be historically inaccurate or preposterous or "lol might as well add a one-legged black lesbian pirate with a lisp" bullshit.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:27 (sixteen years ago)

loool @ u

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:28 (sixteen years ago)

ryan has a good point, I think. People tend to maintain facades of 'normality' and 'decency' long past their social due date, i.e. women in the workforce but still remaining prim, demeure and submissive. Eventually their economic worth and productivity will require them to be more asertive and as they become more assertive and more free, more liberated in aspects of their private lives, too.

ice cr?m, for some reason I briefly saw that as an aboriginal transsexual emu. There is definitely potential there. There's just not enough televisual representation of other sexualities amongst flightless birds from down under.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:28 (sixteen years ago)

morbs obviously loves this show, he can't stop posting about it!~

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:29 (sixteen years ago)

do u understand how unlikely it is that the principle mad men characters would interact with ppl of color in the substantial way u seem to want?

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:30 (sixteen years ago)

Who said anything about interacting?

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:30 (sixteen years ago)

There's a serious point in there - there are no ambitious assertive women or black people with actual lines because, in the eyes through which we are being asked to see this world, they are irrelevant. They might as well be aboriginal transsexuals. They might as well not be there and in the programme they aren't.

I'm not surprised you don't want to see this world through these eyes, it's a pretty arseholish perspective. But because we're looking from this perspective doesn't mean it's being condoned. Quite the opposite actually.

Tuncay Stryder (Matt DC), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:30 (sixteen years ago)

wanting a character to root for and identify with is perfectly normal and defensible and all. and you can always not watch the show. part of the reason i like to watch TV shows and read books though is the chance to find empathy for people i wouldnt normally care for, or identify with people whose lives seem so different from my own.

ryan, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:31 (sixteen years ago)

I just want the camera to follow Sheila home! I WANT TO SEE THE CONVERSATIONS THAT WE DO ACTUALLY KNOW THAT PAUL AND SHEILA MUST HAVE HAD (oh hey guys her three lines were actually the only time he met her, how silly of me!). Or the elevator operator! Or Carla! I want to know what they think.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:32 (sixteen years ago)

what this brilliant show needs is for people just to appreciate its incredible contributions to society and not be all trying to change it w/their angry ideas abt equality

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:32 (sixteen years ago)

mad men: special characters unit

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:32 (sixteen years ago)

melissa, why don't you try your hand at some mad men fanfic

there is no there there (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:33 (sixteen years ago)

I just want the camera to follow Sheila home!

she's not even part of the ad agency which is what this show is aboubudjsaklf;jdksalg;dj..d.jfdskalgjfkgl

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:34 (sixteen years ago)

Who said anything about interacting?

― Melissa W, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:30 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark

huh? do u want a different show completely?

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:34 (sixteen years ago)

jesus h christ.

Batsman (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:35 (sixteen years ago)

I guess I just literally can't understand how having characters of color with lines and agency or one female character with vaguely proto-feminist leanings would suddenly turn the show into something "less subtle".

I'm not sure how the show could have been damaged by making Sheila an actual character with emotions and reactions that we are privy to, or by keeping Rachel on as a permanent fixture.

― Melissa W, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:16 AM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

The problem is, where do you bring in the character of color? He or she has to be involved in Don's life in some non-tangential way; i.e., as a co-worker or relative. Sheila is two degrees removed from Don; the elevator operator interacts with him tangentially at best.

It stretches the boundaries of biological believability for Don to have non-white relative; it stretches the boundaries of socio-historical believability for Don to be working with a person of color. An ad agency with a female copywriter is novel enough; an ad agency with both a (white) woman and a non-white employee in a non-secretarial position, especially at an agency as old-boy-ish as Sterling-Cooper is so unbelievable that it stretches into after-school special territory--i.e., the character is added, verisimilitude be damned, in order to make some kind of point.

max, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:35 (sixteen years ago)

Neither is Trudy. Or Betty. Or Joan's rapist fiancé. We got to see more KITTY ROMANO than we got to see Sheila with Paul. And he did actually date her! That actually happened, I didn't fucking dream it.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:36 (sixteen years ago)

What Matt said. You are looking through the peephole into the men's locker room and complaining that you can't look into the women's locker room. This show is about the men's locker room. It's precisely in the absence of non-white males that we see what these guys are like, not as mere stereotypes or caricatures but as flawed human beings with immense influence, power and self-regard.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:36 (sixteen years ago)

may i suggest the sitcom roc?

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:36 (sixteen years ago)

this is just like when feminists ruined america w/their bra burning except in thread form :(

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:36 (sixteen years ago)

It stretches the boundaries of biological believability for Don to have non-white relative

No it doesn't.

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:37 (sixteen years ago)

I mean, I'm sympathetic to the political ramifications of the point you're making, and I agree that a show about "the other side" of the 60s, done as well as Mad Men, would be terrific. But from a, I don't know, narratological point of view, I don't think Weiner can do the things you want him to without either changing the subject of the show or taking it out of the realm of "believability"!

max, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:38 (sixteen years ago)

Is Paul still going out with Sheila?

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:38 (sixteen years ago)

sorry Dan, clumsily-chosen words, but I think you probably know what I mean...

max, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:38 (sixteen years ago)

We got to see more of Betty and her hot-for-that-one-douchebag's-cock friend!

And the show itself admitted that having a POC in a copywriter position would NOT be unusual by having BBDO hire someone off-screen. And you know, the experiences of a ton of actual people who could tell you that you're talking bullshit.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:38 (sixteen years ago)

she dumped him in MS

mizzell, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)

It stretches the boundaries of biological believability for Don to have (a) non-white relative

Fixed

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)

Melissa! It's not unusual for BBDO to hire a copywriter of color! But BBDO isn't Sterling Cooper! We're not arguing about whether or not it's believable for an advertising agency to hire a POC--we're talking about whether or not it's believable for this specific agency, with its specific mixture of personalities, to do so!

max, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)

And the show itself admitted that having a POC in a copywriter position would NOT be unusual by having BBDO hire someone off-screen.

But Melissa, surely that will NEVER happen at a place like SC!

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:40 (sixteen years ago)

Oops, sorry, max.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:41 (sixteen years ago)

In order for Don's subterfuge to work, Michael's point is more accurate.

I think it would have been kind of awesome for the series to have hinged on a "Human Stain"-style passing revelation but obv. that would be a totally different show.

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:41 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.eaclpp.org/images/the_swan.jpg

Batsman (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:41 (sixteen years ago)

itt: apply current cultural values anachronically

there is no there there (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)

If--say--Sterling Cooper was presented from the start as a progressive, liberal place (one that did work for Kennedy and not Nixon, say), it would be much easier to introduce a black character (for example)--but it's not, and never really has been. And, frankly, if it were, the show would be very, very different!

max, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)

it's so weird when you spent 20 minutes dithering over a short email and look at a thread and there's like ten pages again

thomp, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)

I think the problem here, melissa, is that you're mad at them for eliciting exactly what they want to elicit from you.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:44 (sixteen years ago)

Boredom?

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:44 (sixteen years ago)

I think TNC has some posts somewhere on Mad Men and the theme of "passing"--racial and otherwise.

ryan, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:44 (sixteen years ago)

lol, Melissa, boredom drives me to do a lot of things, but certainly not write multi-paragraph posts on the internet about the object of my boredom.

max, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:45 (sixteen years ago)

You don't know me very well. :(

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:45 (sixteen years ago)

Seriously, it was either this or the Taylor Swift thread.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:46 (sixteen years ago)

I think TNC has some posts somewhere on Mad Men and the theme of "passing"--racial and otherwise.

He does, which is what made me interested in checking out "Mad Men" in the first place. After the first three episodes it fell into my "well-made series I don't really care that much about" file; my wife still loves it, though.

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:47 (sixteen years ago)

(I mean, I definitely see and agree with all of the points being made in favor of the series, I just don't care enough about the characters or the story being told or the boobies of Christina Hendricks to continue watching it.)

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:48 (sixteen years ago)

The show's set in the early '60s, right before the creative revolution swept through the industry. What agency is the straight-laced, white-shoe Sterling Cooper based on?
I'd like to think it's most like BBDO, from what my research tells me. They [didn't] have that much television and the creative revolution seems to have been fueled by a kind of subversive streak from mostly immigrant-background advertising people—Jews, Italians, Germans—but these agencies didn't have a lot of them in 1960. They did by 1962 and 1963, but there was a certain meat-and-potatoes dignity about what [these agencies] did. Also, they had tremendous concerns about government regulation. That was a big issue then ...
if you think back on it, it's not like they're just dinosaurs who are sticking to an old code; they just had different concerns. By the way, the most conservative clients stayed with them through the creative revolution, so there was money to be made. There was a niche, but it was reverse.

mizzell, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:48 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.adweek.com/aw/magazine/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003615039

mizzell, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:49 (sixteen years ago)

I think it would have been kind of awesome for the series to have hinged on a "Human Stain"-style passing revelation but obv. that would be a totally different show.

Please forgive me, Dan, but the idea of funky Dan Draper with his afro and medallion gettin' down to James Brown, singing "Say it loud," and pushing SC to advertise more in Jet and Ebony just has me in stitches.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:53 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.answers.com/topic/caroline-r-jones

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:57 (sixteen years ago)

you know, i've never seen this show. my boyfriend watches it religously and it's the type of thing i would love. but for some reason, i can't get myself excited about watching it. can't pinpoint why.

I love rainbow cookies (surm), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 15:59 (sixteen years ago)

With her skills proven, Jones found herself in a position to promote change in the racially biased world of advertising. It was the seventies and the slogan "Black is Beautiful" was raging across America.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:00 (sixteen years ago)

Wow. Awesome story, Melissa.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:02 (sixteen years ago)

She became a copywriter in 1963, out of the secretarial pool.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:03 (sixteen years ago)

x-post

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:03 (sixteen years ago)

But note that she didn't even arrive at Thompson till '63 and she was not only singualar in being black but in being a college graduate.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:04 (sixteen years ago)

This would make a great story but it wouldn't be about the norms of advertising in the early '60s but about a remarkable woman.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:04 (sixteen years ago)

Also, it should be noted, because she repeatedly asked for chances to prove herself. Not because some man noticed she could make clever puns one day.

x-posts

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:05 (sixteen years ago)

Also note that three of the other secretaries were black women.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:06 (sixteen years ago)

This would make a great story but it wouldn't be about the norms of advertising in the early '60s but about a remarkable woman.

I don't know, I could easily see a show both telling her story and Don's. And I would watch that show.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:08 (sixteen years ago)

Please forgive me, Dan, but the idea of funky Dan Draper with his afro and medallion gettin' down to James Brown, singing "Say it loud," and pushing SC to advertise more in Jet and Ebony just has me in stitches.

That's a funny mental image which is pretty much the exact opposite of passing. Why would that be the first thing to pop into your head at the mention of the concept?

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:08 (sixteen years ago)

Boredom? :)

No. I mean you want it to be representative and inclusive and they're showing you precisely a stratum of society which was not and largely through its own eyes, like I said about the peephole thing above.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:09 (sixteen years ago)

Also, it should be noted, because she repeatedly asked for chances to prove herself. Not because some man noticed she could make clever puns one day.

x-posts

― Melissa W, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 12:05 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

see this is the type of inaccurate bullshit that keeps making people tell u to stfu - don and peggys relationship on the show is pretty compelling and not at all pun based - they share a contemplative quality the others lack - don seeing that in peggy and recognizing her talent is what has let to her advancement

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:10 (sixteen years ago)

Why would that be the first thing to pop into your head at the mention of the concept?

Congenital idiocy?

Actually, what really had me chuckling was the idea of Jon Hamm reprising Gene Wilder's role in Silver Streak.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:11 (sixteen years ago)

...

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:11 (sixteen years ago)

Are you forgetting the part where she was only noticed in the first place because she said some bullshit about a "basket full of kisses" to Freddy Rumsen?

x-posts

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:11 (sixteen years ago)

Melissa, I think we all understand what you want from this show, what would make it more interesting to you but you do realize that it isn't going to happen, right? It's not a show about empowerment, it's a show about decadance.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:14 (sixteen years ago)

she was only noticed in the first place because she said some bullshit about a "basket full of kisses" to Freddy Rumsen?

you really need to stop with the blatant misrepresentation, dunno how many times I have to say this...

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:15 (sixteen years ago)

I mean the opening credits themselves feature a man in free fall...

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:15 (sixteen years ago)

melissa weve all been there on ilx fighting a losing battle looking increasingly ridiculous sounding like a broken record - and i can say from experience youll feel much better if u just take a lil break

until then im taking a strict DO NOT FEED THE TROLL stance and i suggest u all join me

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:18 (sixteen years ago)

I want to see DP and MW achieve a new level of racial understanding following the direction they are going

Batsman (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:19 (sixteen years ago)

What may have begun 24 hours ago as a legitimate dissenting opinion with concerns being raised has long since been debated to deal. Melissa is just trolling now.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:19 (sixteen years ago)

"...As the creator of such memorable phrases as, "Because You're Worth It" for L'Oreal."

Not even kidding, I am really impressed by this.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.answers.com/topic/helen-lansdowne-resor

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:20 (sixteen years ago)

I want to see DP and MW achieve a new level of racial understanding following the direction they are going

I seriously hope DP knows that I am often a total goof.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:21 (sixteen years ago)

Please forgive me, Dan, but the idea of funky Dan Draper with his afro and medallion gettin' down to James Brown, singing "Say it loud," and pushing SC to advertise more in Jet and Ebony just has me in stitches.

That's a funny mental image which is pretty much the exact opposite of passing. Why would that be the first thing to pop into your head at the mention of the concept?


http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/P/0312378556.01._SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg

Horace Silver Machine (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)

you really need to stop with the blatant misrepresentation, dunno how many times I have to say this...

...that's how it happened on the show. Prior to that moment, Peggy had no aspirations towards being a copywriter. She didn't ask for opportunities to prove herself. She was given an opportunity to help out on the lipstick account because Freddy took notice of her insight. Whether or not she's had subsequent displays of ambition, no matter her professional relationship with Don, that's how her story started.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:26 (sixteen years ago)

This is actually true, Shakey Mo.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:29 (sixteen years ago)

guys MW is only here because a Radiohead thread was revived but didn't stay active so she's all wound up and has no place to go

some dude, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:32 (sixteen years ago)

mad lolz at the Wolff ref

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:33 (sixteen years ago)

And Melissa isn't entirely wrong to point out that that's not usually how you get ahead in a corporation...

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:33 (sixteen years ago)

Er, xpost

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:33 (sixteen years ago)

guys I love this thread but it crashes Safari on my iPhone everytime I try to load it, it's too big, won't some brave and witty soul* come up with a snappy new title since we're just at the start of season 3?

*Basketful of posts? etc.. what do I know, I'm just a girl.. ;)

she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:33 (sixteen years ago)

because a Radiohead thread was revived but didn't stay active so she's all wound up and has no place to go

?? I'm not really a big Radiohead fan, fwiw.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:34 (sixteen years ago)

some dick

x-posts

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:35 (sixteen years ago)

MW, I think it's fair to say that Peggy is not as ambitious as the real women copywriters you've mentioned, but there's always been a restlessness in her, a vague dissatisfaction with her lot in life. She may not have asked for opportunities to prove herself, but she seized the opportunities that came her way.

Anyway, my own mom went into teaching in the early '70s because in the culture she grew up in (several years after Mad Men even), working women were either teachers or nurses. It took her nearly 20 years to realize she never really liked it, and she decided to go into marketing instead.

jaymc, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:35 (sixteen years ago)

DONT WORRY EVERYONE ITS JUST A ERRANT RADIOHEAD FAN EVERYTHING IS UNDER CONTROL

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:36 (sixteen years ago)

eh kinda - to say she has no aspirations up to that point (which is only what, the fifth episode?) elides the fact that there is a lot of unspoken stuff going on in this show (why she starts working there at all is never specifically addressed either, for ex), and that prior episodes where Peggy was introduced largely involved her trying to find her way in a foreign and hostile environment. And I think its unfair to discount her subsequent development and assertiveness, her positioning of herself as a "creative", etc. because obviously this reflects a fairly deep-rooted impulse to succeed in the ad world (as opposed to just, say, snagging Pete away from his wife and "settling down" or whatever). Its just disingenous, its unfair to her character and the way she's written to imply that she just happily takes what White Men(tm) hand her, when that isn't really how she behaves.

many x-posts

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:36 (sixteen years ago)

I was forced to post about sex and race all over a Mad Men thread because I'm hot for droopy eyes, you guys. :(

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:42 (sixteen years ago)

classic scenario

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:42 (sixteen years ago)

Its just disingenous, its unfair to her character and the way she's written to imply that she just happily takes what White Men(tm) hand her, when that isn't really how she behaves.

In delightful contrast to Pete Campbell whose petulance and entitlement continually crack me up.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:42 (sixteen years ago)

Melissa, I thought it was 'cause you liked 'em short and droney.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:43 (sixteen years ago)

pete is so delightful indeed

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:43 (sixteen years ago)

Was anybody else a little perplexed by how Don and Betty and Pete and Trudy were all lovey-dovey for the opening? How did their issues resolve themselves or did they, really?

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:48 (sixteen years ago)

calm before the storm

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:49 (sixteen years ago)

Discussion is fine but when the exact same thing is repeated over and over and over it ceases to be interesting, useful or even tolerable. Everyone suggest ban Melissa and let's move on.

Those who have an iTunes season pass to Mad Men were able to download the 3rd episode of the season yesterday, anyone here?

musically, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:51 (sixteen years ago)

yeah i read abt that on gawker - their spoilers sounded suspiciously fake tho

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:53 (sixteen years ago)

they said it was the 2nd ep tho - doesnt seem to have leaked

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:55 (sixteen years ago)

Everyone suggest ban Melissa and let's move on.

Really? Wow.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:57 (sixteen years ago)

Those who have an iTunes season pass to Mad Men were able to download the 3rd episode of the season yesterday, anyone here?

Wait a second ... I got an e-mail yesterday that said "The latest episode is now available to download" and I thought they must've just accidentally sent it twice, because I'd already downloaded the first episode. But now I'm looking at the e-mail again and it says the episode title is My Old Kentucky Home.

jaymc, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:57 (sixteen years ago)

I'm not gonna suggest ban Melissa, that's ridiculous. I don't think she's being trolling or particularly assholish or anything.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 16:59 (sixteen years ago)

im posting the gawker ep 2 spoilers link through a url shortener cause even the url has spoilers - enjoy http://bit.ly/40r7d8

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:00 (sixteen years ago)

I was talking to the people who were arguing with her and calling her a troll, it wasn't an order so don't worry about not complying.

musically, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:08 (sixteen years ago)

they said it was the 2nd ep tho - doesnt seem to have leaked

― ice cr?m

jaymc says the ep title is "My Old Kentucky Home," according to IMDB that is the title of ep 3. Look as if jaymc can confirm whether this is legit or not, but it looks like it.

musically, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:10 (sixteen years ago)

i sbd mellisa and thomp and maybe someone else too - but i have sort of an itchy sb finger - they dont post enough to get 51 so its all for lolz anyway

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:11 (sixteen years ago)

yeah someone in the gawker comments says its ep 3 too

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:12 (sixteen years ago)

if the spoilers are true it sounds like quite an over the top ep

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:13 (sixteen years ago)

Weiner (very vague):

...episode three is a story thing. It's all about me wanting to tell this story, and then we figure out what story we're telling. And you have to be careful that it's not just "our expectations don't turn out as we want," because that would be every episode.

Since I've quoted this interview a couple times already, I might as well link it.

jaymc, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)

melissa i got nothing against you and there have been times when you've been a worthwhile poster, but honestly if you disappear from the board for weeks/months at a time, and tend to pop up as if summoned by bat signal whenever your pet topic is under discussion, and then proceed to create a huge clusterfuck on another thread shortly after, yeah i feel like making fun of that and kinda understand when newer posters call you a troll/sockpuppet/etc

some dude, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)

from jaymc posted interview

• Weiner believes that the encounter with the bellman was the closest Sal has come to consummating a relationship with a man, and that although they were thwarted by nature, "it was a positive experience" for Sal.

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:22 (sixteen years ago)

some dude, I didn't even post on the Radiohead thread other than to question something that Ned said about a rumor. I don't really like either of the new songs, I don't have an interest in posting about them either way either to disagree or agree with whatever the prevailing opinion is, and I lurk every day on the board and post once a week. Also, guess what! The Mad Men S3 premiere was last Sunday, there are lots of think pieces out about it in the press, and I have thoughts! As a woman! And a POC!

I would understand whatever the fuck your issue is with me if I was posting about how Mad Men clearly needs more skinny Britishes and guys with cheekbones, but I'm posting about real issues that are important to me and you're a derailing douchebag.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:31 (sixteen years ago)

yeah i was kinda being a douchebag. like i said, i don't really have anything against you, it was just an easy joke to make.

some dude, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:35 (sixteen years ago)

I have thoughts! As a woman! And a POC!

the way people are treating you on this thread has way less to do with your gender or race than the way you say things like this btw

some dude, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:37 (sixteen years ago)

I don't think anyone is treating me poorly for that specifically, I am telling you why I might have a different POV on this than you.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:38 (sixteen years ago)

btw they got new skinny british guy w/cheekbones

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:39 (sixteen years ago)

i don't understand, is everyone who doesn't respond according to the terms of your argument "derailing"? you use the term like it were a serious offense. smile, you're on ILX

there is no there there (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:40 (sixteen years ago)

did anything come of joan's lesbian roommate to whom joan feigns obliviousness to her advances? (I think i watched all of S1-2, but might have missed an episode or two)

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:41 (sixteen years ago)

not going to dive too deeply into this argument since I really don't care one way or the other about "Mad Men" but hearing all the praise about the show and then watching the first few episodes of the first season recently for the first time did give me "wow white people really miss racism and sexism" moment

this was otm but Dan should still apologize to ppl who love the show unreservedly because it's very mean not to just find it complex & awesome & besides since not all art can be everything it's therefore totally bogus to ask any questions about it

tv not for asking questions, tv for watching

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:46 (sixteen years ago)

i don't understand, is everyone who doesn't respond according to the terms of your argument "derailing"? you use the term like it were a serious offense. smile, you're on ILX

Anyone who implies that I'm being disingenuous is derailing. I don't care what your personal opinion is (but I'll argue about it with you if I disagree because that's how debate goes), but implying that I'm looking to be offended or that I'm a bored Radiohead fanatic (?) looking for a fight or that I'm trolling is indefensible bullshit to me and I'm going to call that out.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:47 (sixteen years ago)

ppl who love the show unreservedly because it's very mean not to just find it complex & awesome & besides since not all art can be everything it's therefore totally bogus to ask any questions about it

the straw men are multiplying.

i liked melissa's point. i respectfully disagreed. (i apologize if my tone implied otherwise.)

ryan, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:48 (sixteen years ago)

lol at what point in dans casual racism accusation was a question ever asked

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:50 (sixteen years ago)

tv not for asking questions, tv for watching

Just because we may differ, doesn't mean I'm watching this uncritically.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:51 (sixteen years ago)

don't worry your head about it ice c., I understand that your position is mad men is beyond reproach & people who say anything bad about it suck

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:52 (sixteen years ago)

I'm implying that you have an established penchant for monomania on this board and right now forwarding your extremely shaky argument about this show over and over and over without getting anywhere with anyone is the obsession you seem to have chosen to pursue instead of your usual topic.

some dude, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:53 (sixteen years ago)

your trolling is inferior to mellisas john - watch how she does it

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:54 (sixteen years ago)

i sbd mellisa and thomp and maybe someone else too - but i have sort of an itchy sb finger - they dont post enough to get 51 so its all for lolz anyway

― ice cr?m, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 5:11 PM (40 minutes ago) Bookmark

dear ilx user 'ice cr?m',

: (

yours,

thomp, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:54 (sixteen years ago)

Btw, wrt to Melissa, I don't see this as trolling and I think it's infra dig to imply that just because you don't agree with her or her emphasis on an aspect of the show. If I wanted to talk about MM to someone who thought exactly like me, I could wander off to the corner and mumble to myself and we all know how much fun that is.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:54 (sixteen years ago)

ice how many mad men t-shirts do you have

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:55 (sixteen years ago)

melissa i don't think you're being disingenuous but you've failed to engage some of the more reasoned responses to your arguments, which tends to encourage the conclusion that you're not really arguing in good faith here

there is no there there (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:55 (sixteen years ago)

did anything come of joan's lesbian roommate to whom joan feigns obliviousness to her advances? (I think i watched all of S1-2, but might have missed an episode or two)

― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 1:41 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark

I think she moved on without it being addressed. Joan's living with her doctor beau now, though.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:55 (sixteen years ago)

melissa i don't think you're being disingenuous but you've failed to engage some of the more reasoned responses to your arguments, which tends to encourage the conclusion that you're not really arguing in good faith here

otm btw, I am sympathetic to your position M but you're kinda doin' a fingers-in-ears thing when somebody actually responds to your points

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:57 (sixteen years ago)

My initial wasn't even an accusation, is the thing! It was a fleeting impression I got from comparing the critical accolades the show got with what I saw in the first few episodes; FIN.

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:57 (sixteen years ago)

xp to Joan's little lesbian roommate remarks - in rewatching s2 I noticed that (in flashback we find out) Peggy's roommate gave Don the mother's number when Peggy was in the hospital, but when she was nursing Bobbie Barrett in the next season, she lives alone. Ladies are doin' it for themselves!

she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:58 (sixteen years ago)

no Dan you said it was racist, I heard you

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:58 (sixteen years ago)

i have zero mad men apparel - anyway john i really think yr music would be better if it was more techno and had a lady singer

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:00 (sixteen years ago)

melissa i don't think you're being disingenuous but you've failed to engage some of the more reasoned responses to your arguments, which tends to encourage the conclusion that you're not really arguing in good faith here

If you haven't noticed, it's pretty much 50 to 1 here. So I've been addressing as much as I can every time I post, but I don't see how I could possibly address every single counter-argument (and still sleep and eat). Either I'm posting too much or not enough! Which argument do you want me to address?

And some dude, you're still being a dick. Try again.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:01 (sixteen years ago)

lol x-post

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:01 (sixteen years ago)

see john while mellisa is a worthy role model dan is really a message board master cause his statement had plausible deniability built in

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:03 (sixteen years ago)

still determining how much offense i should take because it is assumed that i like a show because it provides insight into my glorious past as a wite person.

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:04 (sixteen years ago)

or maybe it's the assumption that i should watch tv like it's a history class.

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:04 (sixteen years ago)

i'm not trying to make nice and redeem myself here, i'm just trying to make myself more clear so you see where my dickishness is coming from and that it's more as an impartial observer than as someone w/ some kinda grudge against you. but, y'know, it's all good, you've got much more worthwhile arguments brewing on this thread, i'll let you get back to those.

some dude, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:06 (sixteen years ago)

im somewhat giving dan a hard time here - his was really more of a well constructed snipe than any sort of big accusation - anyway im still boggling at the idea that anyone could think mad men represents an aspirational vision of the past

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:08 (sixteen years ago)

to be fair I do kinda wish I had a bar in my office

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:09 (sixteen years ago)

and some nice suits.

but that's about it

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:09 (sixteen years ago)

his was really more of a well constructed snipe than any sort of big accusation

THANK YOU

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:10 (sixteen years ago)

haha dan sry just fuckin w/u jeez

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:11 (sixteen years ago)

"im still boggling at the idea that anyone could think mad men represents an aspirational vision of the past"

fly honeys and bling bling make Mad Men the equivalent of gangsta rap videos for white people the same way gangsta rap videos are gangsta rap videos for white people.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:11 (sixteen years ago)

anyway in my experience drinking @ work in the afternoon is just kinda depressing - the suits are sweet tho

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:12 (sixteen years ago)

drinking @ work in the afternoon is just kinda depressing

^^^^^ this

velko, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)

See, I didn't get that as an accusation thing, either. I got that as a rather natural reaction on Dan's part.

I grew up with 'liberal' parents but in several places where either racial segregation was a social norm or there's simply weren't many people of color (my grammar school, for instance, had one Native American and that was our diversity). It wasn't until I moved to the Bay Area when I was 12, did I really have the opportunity to meet people of color. I think part of my curiosity about the all-white vision, or mostly-white vision on MM is the insight it gives me to what was the dying-end of absolute male white supremacy that surrounded me as a child. I didn't like or trust that culture much (I hated their illogical and authoritarian relgiosity) and they didn't much like me (child of outsider, ecological, hippie/commies) but I was certainly curious about it. I don't mean to imply that I think racism or sexism are dead or anything, but I grew up amidst a lot of evangelicals who thought Phyllis Schafly was awesome and openly evinced a desire to return to a 'simpler time' while 'Our Bodies, Ourselves' was a coffeetable book in my house and I remember being confused whether it was okay or not to eat grapes one year. White people in flannel suits living in Connecticut was about as foregn to my upbringing in California as anything.

Le présent se dégrade, d'abord en histoire, puis en (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:14 (sixteen years ago)


i have zero mad men apparel - anyway john i really think yr music would be better if it was more techno and had a lady singer

you will be stoked to hear the Mel W is voicing my Reason-sponsored techno debut, 19 songs about how easy it is to get ilx user ice cr&am to bring up my day job with just a few well-placed grumbles

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:14 (sixteen years ago)

lol some1 should explain to me what was well-constructed about it

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:15 (sixteen years ago)

fly honeys and bling bling make Mad Men the equivalent of gangsta rap videos for white people the same way gangsta rap videos are gangsta rap videos for white people.

― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 2:11 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

eh the show really goes out of the way to point out how painful the situation is for everyone - some but not most gangsta rap videos do the same

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:15 (sixteen years ago)

anyway im still boggling at the idea that anyone could think mad men represents an aspirational vision of the past

I believe the argument is not that we're supposed to look at how the characters in "Mad Men" behave and think "ah yes, that is how things should be!" as much as it we're supposed to look at what's going on and think "the trappings of success included some really wretched things/situations; how many of those would I have been willing to put up with in order to be successful?", otherwise as others have pointed out it doesn't seem like there's anything else to emotionally connect you to the story and you're just left with repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty.

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:17 (sixteen years ago)

i'm boggling trying to remember the point where someone said it represented an aspirational vision of the past tbh

thomp, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:18 (sixteen years ago)

wait. can you boggle intransitively?

thomp, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:18 (sixteen years ago)

seriously shocked that anyone posted to this thread after the happy ladies revelation

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:18 (sixteen years ago)

i for one pine for the days when racism and sexism still existed

( ´_ゝ˙) (Dr. Phil), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:19 (sixteen years ago)

wait. can you boggle intransitively?

It just takes a little practice.

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:20 (sixteen years ago)

i for one yearn for a return to the times when men wore sock-garters and white people drank raw eggs with brandy

there is no there there (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:20 (sixteen years ago)

www.youtube.com xp

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:21 (sixteen years ago)

ok sry john i know u dont like it when people talk abt yr band - but the colliery is was just too great to resist - criticism that wants an artwork to be something other than it is rather than dealing w/it on its own merits is just really wtf to me - while mellisa has some good points here most of what shes talking abt fits that description - and she saying it over and over again

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:21 (sixteen years ago)

"the trappings of success included some really wretched things/situations; how many of those would I have been willing to put up with in order to be successful?"

mo' money, mo' problems...

any bets on when "don draper" starts showing up as aspirational figure in hip-hop lyrics?

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:21 (sixteen years ago)

don't post

cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:22 (sixteen years ago)

the reason we don't see more of sheila is because her purpose is not to highlight civil rights, but to show how much of a fraud/poser paul is. his character still exists today (please take one trip to williamsburg and check out all the vegan hipster "buddhist" "activist" types that still do tons of drugs and drink shitty beer and party all the time but think they are making a difference, superficially or otherwise). i'm sure he will have more 'look at me i'm so liberal' moments that prove this point further, but it comes back to the fact that the show is about the people in the office. as someone else said, sheila is 2 degrees separated from don, and while i think a television show about women and poc fighting for advancement in the workplace is one that could be interesting and that i might watch, in this case it would feel really, really heavy handed.

tehresa, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:23 (sixteen years ago)

colliery? What about coal mines?

What is it about this thread that's gotten everybody so riled up? People can be civil without disagreeing.

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:23 (sixteen years ago)

i'm boggling trying to remember the point where someone said it represented an aspirational vision of the past tbh

― thomp, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 2:18 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

its pretty key to a lot of the arguments being made here - including some of yours

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:23 (sixteen years ago)

i'm boggling trying to remember the point where someone said it represented an aspirational vision of the past tbh

um, see Dan's post about white men missing their racism and sexism... I think that's the only real mention

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:24 (sixteen years ago)

the reason we don't see more of sheila is because her purpose is not to highlight civil rights, but to show how much of a fraud/poser paul is.

Yup.

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:24 (sixteen years ago)

colliery? What about coal mines?

― repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, August 19, 2009 2:23 PM (12 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

lol fn spellcheck

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:24 (sixteen years ago)

The irony being that the show uses her, in a Kantian sense, pretty much as shabbily as Paul does.

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:25 (sixteen years ago)

well played!

tehresa, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:26 (sixteen years ago)

ice crm i said the show is nostalgic for past behaviours but i don't think i have argued that it presents them as better than modern ones. mb i have, though, it was a lot of posts ago and i can't really remember ~

thomp, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:26 (sixteen years ago)

I for one am curious to see if any more comes to light about Paul's relationship with Sheila and whether, as I suspect, she dumped him during their "freedom ride" because he's a sanctimonious jackass....

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:26 (sixteen years ago)

I dunno what "colliery" is, but leave me out of this

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:27 (sixteen years ago)

i for 1 would like to say fuck all these white ppl who did anything to progress the cause of civil rights for less than 100% unimpeachable reasons - obviously they were all shitty ppl and the world would be a better place if not for them

thomp, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:27 (sixteen years ago)

i feel like that's what the writers lead us to believe, without necessarily having to show it (just like we get that duck got put out on his ass). the neat part is that joan's being joan at that party probably set in motion sheila's realization that paul is a jackass.

xpost

tehresa, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:28 (sixteen years ago)

so here we have a strongish female character helping to effect a positive change for a poc.

tehresa, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:28 (sixteen years ago)

ice crm i said the show is nostalgic for past behaviours but i don't think i have argued that it presents them as better than modern ones. mb i have, though, it was a lot of posts ago and i can't really remember ~

― thomp, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 2:26 PM (9 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

well nostaliga is kinda a loaded term - to speak more simply abt how the show judges the social systems the characters find themselves in - it judges them to be painful

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:30 (sixteen years ago)

theresa really does have a point, though, imso. Withal his hipster beard and Hefener-esque pipe and oh-so-liberal-tolerance for black girlfriends, he's still an ambitious ad-man and there's something about his character, since he's less overtly and ridiculously flawed than Pete that makes me dislike him. The puerile way he dealt with Ken's short story being published and Ken's preening in front of the girls, for example.

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:31 (sixteen years ago)

There was any question that Paul's kind of a jackass?

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:33 (sixteen years ago)

criticism that wants an artwork to be something other than it is rather than dealing w/it on its own merits is just really wtf to me

you know, I understand & often agree with yr point but when we're dealing w/representation of history it seems to me always fair to say "there are more histories in this history than are being represented, and the choice to exclude them tells you something about both the art & its creator & maybe its audience" - like, haven't you ever read some 19th century brit lit/early 20th century Am Lit and gone "really, who gives a fuck about these rich white ppl who seem to think that only they exist or count for shit" - you know? some of those books are Great Literature & they are what they are but it's still worth the breath to say "fuck those people and most of what they stood for"

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:33 (sixteen years ago)

Withal his hipster beard and Hefener-esque pipe and oh-so-liberal-tolerance for black girlfriends, he's still an ambitious ad-man and there's something about his character, since he's less overtly and ridiculously flawed than Pete that makes me dislike him.

yeah I agree with this - I was more predisposed to him prior to his irritating speech on the bus about how much advertising has to contribute to the civil rights cause (namedropping Marx lolz)

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:34 (sixteen years ago)

i keep reading this even though i have never seen this but then i don't watch television because I have a short attention span and always forget when the show I like is on and never bother watching eps on tv unless its like south park or something jus sayin

❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:36 (sixteen years ago)

yeah but to come back to my other point the show is already saying fuck these people and what they stand for xp

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:36 (sixteen years ago)

like, haven't you ever read some 19th century brit lit/early 20th century Am Lit and gone "really, who gives a fuck about these rich white ppl who seem to think that only they exist or count for shit" - you know? some of those books are Great Literature & they are what they are but it's still worth the breath to say "fuck those people and most of what they stood for"

sure if the book doesn't have enough good qualities to overcome the fact that i personally cannot relate to the characters.

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:37 (sixteen years ago)

and while history is obv way more important to mad men than yr average show its still mostly abt a group of miserable people in a fucked up industry

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:38 (sixteen years ago)

"I was more predisposed to him prior to his irritating speech on the bus about how much advertising has to contribute to the civil rights cause"
how can you hate a character that brings on the laughs like that? also he looks exactly like orson welles!

http://blog.whoaretheadwizards.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/orson.gif

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:39 (sixteen years ago)

sucks that the desperate housewives never mention darfur btw

❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

Melissa: do you think that if the show DID show some of the stories you want to see, then perhaps they might come off as condescending, or maybe even tokenism? Why is leaving those stories alone in order to focus on others more thoroughly so offensive? Wouldn't it be better, if you're the one making mad men and the story it's trying to tell, to let those stories be told better and more thoroughly elsewhere?

ryan, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

there is also the post-HBO oh-so-dramatic style where everything and everyone is so dark and screwed up and nobody can ever get their shit together, look LOOK at the tawdry underbelly under the placid exterior etc etc. there is a soapiness about this show and others of its kind that ought to be considered before condemning or praising what it might be "saying". of course it's glamorous, and of course that glamor is constantly "problematized" by one misery or another, that's the show, the show

goole, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:42 (sixteen years ago)

well I can answer that - because they AREN'T being told more thoroughly elsewhere. (although that is more a criticism of the television INDUSTRY as a whole, and its unfair to hold it against a particular show. which several of us have pointed out already)

x-post

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:43 (sixteen years ago)

Of course. You're right.

ryan, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:43 (sixteen years ago)

sure if the book doesn't have enough good qualities to overcome the fact that i personally cannot relate to the characters.

I got a whole century's worth of boring brit lit about the landed gentry that yr just gonna adore my friend - the writing's impeccable & it's printed on acid-free paper to boot

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:44 (sixteen years ago)

how much of that lit is explicitly critical of the landed gentry tho... (cuz Mad Men is pretty damning towards most of its characters)

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:45 (sixteen years ago)

I guess I feel within the confines of a tv and given the fact that the show has certainly made economic decisions on what will and won't get an audience--despite those limitations the show does a fairly graceful job of alluding to it's own exclusions.

ryan, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:45 (sixteen years ago)

Heart of Darkness was pretty critical of colonialism but that didn't stop it from being a total dick wrt racims.

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:47 (sixteen years ago)

("racims" are kind of like Steak-umms, only with fewer reperations)

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)

well I can answer that - because they AREN'T being told more thoroughly elsewhere. (although that is more a criticism of the television INDUSTRY as a whole, and its unfair to hold it against a particular show. which several of us have pointed out already)

That's pretty much it, yes. And it would have been nice if this show could have been used as a Trojan horse to tell both Don's story and a fictionalized Caroline R. Jones. Which I want to see. And is a story worth telling. And IMO, a story more worth telling than this one.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)

how much of that lit is explicitly critical of the landed gentry tho

a fair bit of it, but the criticism is offset by the historical act of privileging one segment of society as worth writing about - big problem with woolf as I understand things

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)

I was thinking about those old landed gentry novels myself and had the very obvious insight that those books were exclusively read by...landed gentry. Worth comparing to mad men's audience and their relative affluence!

ryan, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:49 (sixteen years ago)

("racims" are kind of like Steak-umms, only with fewer reperations)

Erik B & Racims

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:49 (sixteen years ago)

And fair enough Melissa!

ryan, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:50 (sixteen years ago)

has anyone seen the US version of Life on Mars want to contrast with Mad Men dealing with similar retro macho culture amidst social change?
I think #1 problem with this request is no one has seen US version of Life on Mars.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)

i'm not sure if i'm disappointed that i can't fully participate in this discussion because i haven't watched the show, or if i'm relieved

(probably the latter)

there is no there there (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:51 (sixteen years ago)

lol j0hn i am now reading the moonstone which is all about big english country houses and having 8 servants and shit but it's ultimately an entertaining mystery yarn so i can put aside my objections to that system for 400 pages.

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)

btw the real answer to the question "who fetishizes this show and its lifestyle" may be found here in a thread started by one of this boards most influential scholars

http://www.ilxor.com/ILX/ThreadSelectedControllerServlet?boardid=77&threadid=66393

max, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)

cxp yea i don't know why i'm reading this thread, i've never seen a single ep

mark cl, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:53 (sixteen years ago)

ppl in liking to dress up for parties shockah

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)

There may be a sense in which writing about and from the position of power is always more alluring, maybe even more interesting if you'll forgive that word. Marxist realism is kind of a chore.

ryan, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)

i wouldn't mind the return of the mandatory suit tbh

there is no there there (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:55 (sixteen years ago)

(btw speaking of Marxist realism, The Jungle was also a huge racist dick)

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:55 (sixteen years ago)

there is also the post-HBO oh-so-dramatic style where everything and everyone is so dark and screwed up and nobody can ever get their shit together, look LOOK at the tawdry underbelly under the placid exterior etc etc. there is a soapiness about this show and others of its kind that ought to be considered before condemning or praising what it might be "saying". of course it's glamorous, and of course that glamor is constantly "problematized" by one misery or another, that's the show, the show

― goole, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 2:42 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^^ this is a good post btw ignore it at yr peril

max, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:56 (sixteen years ago)

agreed - except clearly goole has never watched an actual soap opera

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:59 (sixteen years ago)

i have seen youtubes of passions -- i am very well versed

goole, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 18:59 (sixteen years ago)

"i wouldn't mind the return of the mandatory suit tbh"

out of all the things on this thread, this is the only statement that truly fills me with rage! casual friday traitor!

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:00 (sixteen years ago)

lol j0hn i am now reading the moonstone which is all about big english country houses and having 8 servants and shit but it's ultimately an entertaining mystery yarn so i can put aside my objections to that system for 400 pages.

secretly jealous of you, edith wharton (one of the best stylists I know of) was pretty much ruined for me when the anti-semitism of the house of mirth got up its head of steam :( I mean I don't ask writers of all ages to be Right On!! all the time but it gets hard to take y'know

which I think is the feminist criticism of the "that's not the story this show is telling" angle: sure, fair enough, but there's more than one way to deal with that imo & the "this way or after-school special" duality ref'd upthread is some disingenuous bs imo

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:01 (sixteen years ago)

Except "this way" doesn't really apply to mad men either.

ryan, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:03 (sixteen years ago)

eh there is something pretty didactic abt mellisas mad men rewrite

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:05 (sixteen years ago)

you really can't blame "mellisa" on yr spellchecker

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:06 (sixteen years ago)

My triple A card says "Mallisah".

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:08 (sixteen years ago)

haa no as long time readers of this site prob have noticed i am a horrible speller and typer - therefor i am at the mercy of my spellchecker - apologies Melissa W

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:09 (sixteen years ago)

Also, didacticism (whatever, it's a word) seems to me to be a consequence of tokenism. If they could write real fleshed out characters with flaws and all rather than as Lessons for White People, it wouldn't come across as didactic. So that's totally up to the skills of the writers, if my vision were to play out on screen.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:10 (sixteen years ago)

I dunno, Lessons For White People sounds like it has huge hit potential!

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:15 (sixteen years ago)

the thing i found didactic w/yr vision for the show is you seemed to want these new characters to be more virtuous than the rest of the lowlifes inhabiting madmen xp

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:15 (sixteen years ago)

1. Stop driving like this

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:15 (sixteen years ago)

"Heart of Darkness was pretty critical of colonialism but that didn't stop it from being a total dick wrt racims."

will someone please change their user name to "Heart Of Darkness is a total dick".

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:17 (sixteen years ago)

yeah but tokenism would be awfully hard to avoid considering the setting and parameters that the show has set. I guess it could slowly reduce Don to a secondary character, etc...and hell that'd be kinda of interesting and aesthetically cool too!

ryan, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:18 (sixteen years ago)

the thing i found didactic w/yr vision for the show is you seemed to want these new characters to be more virtuous than the rest of the lowlifes inhabiting madmen

Who said anything about virtue? Obviously anyone looks virtuous next to someone repeatedly kicking them in the head, but that doesn't actually make them inherently virtuous or perfected.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:22 (sixteen years ago)

Like "STOP KICKING ME IN THE HEAD FFS" is a laudable mission but it doesn't mean you don't personally kill puppies when the kicking stops for the night.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:23 (sixteen years ago)

will someone please change their user name to "kill puppies when the kicking stops".

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:24 (sixteen years ago)

woah i need to actually watch this show more, didn't know hardcore shit like that was going down

some dude, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:24 (sixteen years ago)

it's like a metaphor dude

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)

I wouldn't be surprised, btw, if the show begins to expand and include exactly the kind of storylines you want, while still remaining focused on the main characters. After all, it's a bit of a "Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" kind of story, and I think things will splinter off in a lot of different directions. of course we have to judge the show we have now.

ryan, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)

this fucking thread

Roz, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)

(sorry it's just that everytime i come back here there are like a thousand more posts)

Roz, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)

I am always happy to oblige Scott.

kill puppies when the kicking stops (Nicole), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:28 (sixteen years ago)

;_;

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:29 (sixteen years ago)

Crying juggalos always make me feel wistful.

kill puppies when the kicking stops (Nicole), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 19:30 (sixteen years ago)

Wow, I totally missed the best day on here, seriously -- so much to say!

nabisco, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:14 (sixteen years ago)

Feel free!

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:17 (sixteen years ago)

"so much to say!"

uh oh. batten down the hatches, ilx.

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:22 (sixteen years ago)

http://i30.tinypic.com/zv1naq.jpg
― Melissa W, Tuesday, July 28, 2009 7:46 AM (3 weeks ago) Bookmark

huh so I guess something is a little wrong with this picture

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:24 (sixteen years ago)

Almost by definition, people in the past have ethics and moral stands we find problematic at best. Tossing out 'House of Mirth' for anti-semitism without gleaning something from it is akin to never reading history 'cause people used to be such dicks in the past. Art should teach us to walk in other people's shoes, not just people we admire and not just people of whom we approve. If not, it's just an amen chorus and the fact that human beings, even dead ones, are complicated enough where we can approve of certain aspects of their character and behavior and disapprove of others is kind of the point, no? When I said that the past is another country, I am also implying that we should have as much circumspection about other countries, now, and by extension to people different to ourselves both now and in the past. Melissa's critiques are interesting, insightful and essentially the starting point for another potential show, but I think she's (and I don't much care if you like this appraisal or not, Melissa) almost willfully trying not to appreciate why people like this show, nor engaging with it on its own terms. Should you feel the need to watch a show that reflects your life and circumstances better and more accurately, no-one is in any position to gainsay that, but Weiner's show is his own; it's not about moral uplift, it's not about inclusion, it's not about about society as a whole. It's a narrowly focussed study of a certain part of society in a certain place in a certain time and at a point I feel like you just don't like this show and you're trying to tear it down when it's just that it's not the story you want to hear.

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:26 (sixteen years ago)

Shakey, http://www.lasculturas.com/articles/culture-and-identity/78-latinos-inctos

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:33 (sixteen years ago)

Rita Hayworth! okay that one I didn't know

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:36 (sixteen years ago)

after reading this thread all i can say is (1) holy shit and (2) looks like there's another show worth writing. so somebody (Melissa?) should def get on that.

teabaggers, birthers, flat-earthers (will), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:37 (sixteen years ago)

Rita Hayworth! okay that one I didn't know

Wha???!!!

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:39 (sixteen years ago)

Was Anthony Quinn considered Latino at the time? I didn't know he was Mexican for a long time, but I'd only heard his name and hadn't seen his movies.

jaymc, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:40 (sixteen years ago)

I think Mad Men has kind of used up the opportunity to make a show about advertising in the early '60s! :(

x-post

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)

(Sorry, Shakey but the gf watches endless Hollywood bios and Rita's rather sad story and the fact that she vaguely reminds me of my mother at a certain age has always stayed with me.)

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:41 (sixteen years ago)

I think Mad Men has kind of used up the opportunity to make a show about advertising in the early '60s!

Or not. Bets on how many productions will try to ride its coattails?

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:42 (sixteen years ago)

I hope this doesn't sound insensitive or whatever but I do actually think Mad Men is telling a story that I, at least, haven't seen before. There are lots of triumphalist accounts of the 60s from the point of view of the hippies, teenager, POC, and so on. I know, of course, that these accounts are perhaps often still marginalized and they still need to be told...but there is certainly a sense in which the 60s is presented as a kind of great awakening, even self-congratulatory narrative of baby-boomers.

Choosing to focus, as Weiner has, on the people doomed to be left behind or overwhelmed by these coming historical changes DOES strike me as kind of interesting. It's the definition of dramatic irony.

now the obvious response is "boo-hoo fuck the landed gentry" and all, but I dunno, it's fascinating.

ryan, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:42 (sixteen years ago)

they could all live in a remodeled firehouse together and solve crimes on the weekends

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:44 (sixteen years ago)

but there is certainly a sense in which the 60s is presented as a kind of great awakening, even self-congratulatory narrative of baby-boomers.

Wouldn't it then be interesting to show how little people like Don had to do with that "great awakening" while still showing the people who did at the same time? It could be an antidote to that kind of self-congratulation.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:45 (sixteen years ago)

I dunno, the moment has probably passed a little. But I know that when I started watching this show, I was pretty curious about how it would treat issues of race, class, and gender, to be honest I was scared that it would try too hard: that it would do that clumsy modern thing of retro-scripting the past to include people in places they wouldn't have been, or that it would constantly be nudging us to notice the tribulations of un-privileged types, or that it would attempt that rote "panoramic" view of the 60s that feels obligated to pay lip service to all the usual facets.

But so far as I can tell, it mostly just credits the viewer's intelligence: it presents a strict view of a particular privileged class of people, it assumes you know precisely what's being excluded and why. This is particularly true with race, obviously -- we're looking at a group of people who, e.g., honestly wouldn't interact with black people beyond a service capacity, and honestly wouldn't give a great deal of thought to that fact. Getting side-tours to point this out would probably make me roll my eyes and change the channel. As for gender, that's a very different story -- and there's no question that the show focuses more on its male characters than its female ones -- but the tack it's taken seems sound and interesting to me. Rather than nudging our modern expectations and making itself a story about women worked to overcome all that ambient sexism, it shoots for something we don't think about as often: how this particular class of women worked within all the ambient sexism, as most women had to. (Including those women who accepted the ambient sexism as natural!) I don't know how well it always gets at this, but it strikes me as a sound goal -- and a lot of the women I know who enjoy this show seem to enjoy it on that level, because it gets them thinking about how they might have operated in a gender system a lot more unequal than today's.

But then here's the thing: Weiner's talked a lot about wanting to take this show all the way through the 60s, and my guess is that he is saving up certain things -- saving, I would guess, for some point where things like feminism or the civil rights movement start to intrude more meaningfully on the world he's looking at.

In any case, I suppose my main value here is some level of intellectual honesty -- I don't expect the show to represent the whole of the 60s, and I don't think it sets out to do that (it's pretty narrow), and so long as it seems honest about what it is trying to represent, I can't really blame it for not covering everything. (I think Ta-Nehisi Coates was posting recently about this, actually, in response to something on Feministing (maybe?) about Mad Men.) And thus far, its slight bends into these things have actually not been very satisfying to me -- Kinsey's black girlfriend, for instance; something about that didn't work for me. I guess we'll see as it goes on.

Also BTW I think Girlfriends is over and the letter-writing campaign to rescind the cancellation of The Game didn't work out, so yeah, if anyone wants to talk about larger television-programming issues, I'm game. Also, with Mad Men, if you want to talk about white people who seem to just find it quaint and glamorous and the clothes are pretty & c., I would happily bitch about that a little bit, too. I think I made a joke upthread about that "Mad Men Yourself" flash thing, how like if I made a version of me, would my only clothing option be an elevator uniform? And when I eventually made one and put myself in a suit next to a Draper sprite, that was when I felt like something weird and dishonest was happening, that this Flash game invited you to put yourself in a world that I think any viewer should know, on a really deep intense level and without needing to show to remind them, was built on a lot of exclusion.

nabisco, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:46 (sixteen years ago)

They're fodder for one or two composite characters, ice cr?m. Not a whole cast of anachronisms.

x-post

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:47 (sixteen years ago)

maria went to college with the mad men guy. the weiner guy. and johnny temple from girls-vs-boys too. and folk singer dar williams.

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:47 (sixteen years ago)

ILX Hall Of Fame

^^^another great source for cool people to model characters on

velko, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:49 (sixteen years ago)

lol nabisco otm

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:50 (sixteen years ago)

Shhhh Scott, don't tell anyone but I really like Dar Williams. Or at least I used to.

The Lion's Mane Jellyfish, pictured here with its only natural predator (Laurel), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:51 (sixteen years ago)

we're looking at a group of people who, e.g., honestly wouldn't interact with black people beyond a service capacity

I was really intrigued by the scene of Betty with her father's housekeeper (who was I assume her nanny) as it went beyond this capacity while still being defined by it.

mizzell, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:52 (sixteen years ago)

"how this particular class of women worked within all the ambient sexism, as most women had to."

have to.

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)

For some reason Betty's breakdown into the maid's arms reminded me of Ron Reagan Jr's supposedly having thought his mother was actually the family's black maid until he was 9 or something.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:54 (sixteen years ago)

was built on a lot of exclusion.

Not trying to downplay the racism and sexism but even someone with Dick Whitman's background wouldn't be here, hence Don Draper.

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:55 (sixteen years ago)

Rather than nudging our modern expectations and making itself a story about women worked to overcome all that ambient sexism, it shoots for something we don't think about as often: how this particular class of women worked within all the ambient sexism, as most women had to. (Including those women who accepted the ambient sexism as natural!) I don't know how well it always gets at this, but it strikes me as a sound goal

TBH while this was the story of a lot of women then, I think the idea that this was status quo is a fantasy. There may not have been a lot of action from the majority of women, but there was a lot of chatter, esp. post-WWII after all the women who had been working were told to go back home, and as more and more women were attending college as a matter of course.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:55 (sixteen years ago)

"Shhhh Scott, don't tell anyone but I really like Dar Williams."

i haven't heard that much dar. i liked girls-vs-boys though. and that dude johnny puts out cool books now.

there was just an article in the village voice about the wesleyan indie rocker mob around these days. and santogold too!

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:57 (sixteen years ago)

"how this particular class of women worked within all the ambient sexism, as most women had to."

have to.

― scott seward, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 1:53 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

I believe I referenced du Barry above but I think that nabisco's point is that some women were better able than others to get whatthey wanted within that sexist society than others and were hence, often less inclined to rebel against the system.

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 20:57 (sixteen years ago)

For some reason Betty's breakdown into the maid's arms reminded me of Ron Reagan Jr's supposedly having thought his mother was actually the family's black maid until he was 9 or something.

― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, August 19, 2009 4:54 PM (42 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

the whole nanny/mammy role is a particularly bizarre chapter in our racial history - at some point mid century some privileged southern white ladies wanted to erect a monument on the washington mall to they mammies - it almost happened too i shit u not

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:03 (sixteen years ago)

yeah, they worked the old boy system. i get that. just meant that people still do this. things have changed somewhat, but...

x-post

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:03 (sixteen years ago)

still a lot of "ambient sexism" around.

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:04 (sixteen years ago)

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9C01E6DA1530E233A25756C1A9639C946196D6CF

holy shit

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:05 (sixteen years ago)

did brian eno invent ambient sexism jus playin

❊❁❄❆❇❃✴❈plaxico❈✴❃❇❆❄❁❊ (I know, right?), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:06 (sixteen years ago)

the whole nanny/mammy role is a particularly bizarre chapter in our racial history

Yeah but wetnurses, amahs...

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:06 (sixteen years ago)

Dan, holy shit indeed. Mighty white of'em all.

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:08 (sixteen years ago)

the more things change...

scott seward, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:09 (sixteen years ago)

Speaking of mammies and working within the system brings to mind Hattie McDaniel's famous line, "I'd rather make $700 a week playing a maid than earn $7 a day being a maid."

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:11 (sixteen years ago)

are amahs brit version of mammies? JG Ballard's amah didn't seem too motherly in Empire of the Sun.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:12 (sixteen years ago)

Lessons For White People No. 2.: Stop making Mammy Monuments

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:12 (sixteen years ago)

amah? Is that derived from ummah?

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:12 (sixteen years ago)

haa i think were over that particular tic at this point xp

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:13 (sixteen years ago)

oh, Chinese - duh

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:13 (sixteen years ago)

ok i have downloaded and read the pdf of the pro mammy monument editorial dan linked to and it must been seen to be believed omg

http://i32.tinypic.com/99evf9.jpg

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9C01E6DA1530E233A25756C1A9639C946196D6CF

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:18 (sixteen years ago)

That may well be true, Mel, sure; I can't judge the accuracy for the group of women we're looking at, which is largely secretaries and young blue-blood wives who maybe studied art at Wellesley. (Versus, say, Midge.) I dunno.

Just for the record, though, I guess I'm talking less about accuracy and more about what interests the show. Let's take Salvatore as an example. There's no big leap to presenting a married, highly closeted "gay" man in the art department; that seems honest and accurate. So what is the show interested in with this guy? Thus far it's not the more rarefied story leading toward Stonewall, or anything -- what the show seems interested in is the everyday conflict and repression of it, the difficulty of being in that position and not trying to buck the status quo. I think I appreciate that intellectually and aesthetically. There are actually a LOT of stories about this era that center on change and liberation and overcoming. I think, on this front, I enjoy this show most when it peers at the opposite, the ways different people had to operate to get around a very different social system. E.g., I think one reason Joan captivates a lot of people is that she's always exercising power in these small, restricted ways -- swallowing and even enforcing the status quo of gender, but also finding the spaces where she can exploit it or fight to control things.

I guess I don't disagree with you entirely, because I like the show more when it's looking at these things, and would probably like it better if it were more about that and less about, like, Draper's affairs. I hope/assume it'll follow those things, and that the paths of characters like Peggy and Sal and Joan will unavoidably run into bigger social trends. But I do really like that it wonders less about how social things changed and more about all the fascinating way people operated around them in the first place -- people who seem both like us (in that they have the same needs) and really not (in that they're trying to satisfy them in a hugely different social space).

nabisco, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:20 (sixteen years ago)

I just meant it's true, it's a weird chapter in our racial history but it's as much about class as race when seen globally.

I went to a wedding once where the bride and her sisters' 'mammy' (she was never referred to except by her name, so I don't know what her position was called), an old and somewhat frail, old black lady with diabetes nonetheless got herself dressed up and came to the reception (along with her sister) to the surprise of mnay and the delight of her and the bride who danced together. I was pretty shocked that anybody near me in age had grown up in such a way.

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:20 (sixteen years ago)

1910! i seriously thought it was gonna be like 1982

xps

goole, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:21 (sixteen years ago)

I am tempted to try putting forward this exact same proposal to see what would happen now, esp. coming from a black guy born and raised in the north

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:23 (sixteen years ago)

It would be neat to see stern hatchet faced gentry suddenly regressing and climbing into arms of a lifesize statue, cooing.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:25 (sixteen years ago)

That proposal came ten years after the infamous storm.

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:28 (sixteen years ago)

(I spend a lot of my time wondering about the dynamics between uptown Manhattan kids and their Caribbean / Eastern-European nannies. For a while I thought there wasn't a ton of long-term attachment, but then I saw something about a kid who grew up to be a lawyer and put a ton of time into sorting out some legal issue for his old nanny's kid, and his explanation was like, duh, she practically raised me, how would I not do this?)

nabisco, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:31 (sixteen years ago)

(The park by my old place, however, seemed to suggest that the parents swap nannies out periodically, possibly to avoid attachment or familial feeling.)

nabisco, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:32 (sixteen years ago)

aw, the human side of gabbneb
xpost

velko, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:33 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, nabisco, the lady I mentioned was 'family' long after she retired, after raising their three kids.

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:35 (sixteen years ago)

I don't think nannies themselves are weird, or that kids raised by nannies are necessarily weird, but as a parent entrusting the raising of your child to a paid employee strikes me as deeply weird

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:38 (sixteen years ago)

well, I'm sure everyone in that position thinks they do the important and required part of the child-rearing, and that the help is really in a babysitting-type capacity. (Hell, the idea that parents should be really substantially involved in their children's lives is a relatively new development, wouldn't you say?)

nabisco, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:42 (sixteen years ago)

Thus far it's not the more rarefied story leading toward Stonewall, or anything -- what the show seems interested in is the everyday conflict and repression of it, the difficulty of being in that position and not trying to buck the status quo.

I think, though, that there are significant differences between a story about someone who's closeted vs. someone who obtains a position despite their visible identity. Sal's story is about fear and repression and that makes a great deal of sense for what his story is. He's forced to hide but he's not forced to prove himself on a daily basis because he is gay, because no one but Don even knows it (and Don didn't know before this latest premiere). No one is waiting for Sal to trip up or for him to prove that gay men make terrible additions to a company.

I'm troubled by Peggy's story because most women who made it in male-dominated industries at that time were extraordinary exceptions, women who stood out even over other men because of their talent, dedication, and ambition. They had to work twice as hard to be seen as half as good. They had to work their way up with no support. And I don't think Peggy or her story exemplifies the amount of sheer determination or, frankly, undeniable brilliance it would have taken to stay afloat in that environment. This isn't about wanting Peggy to be a wish fulfillment character for my own personal fantasies, it's about acknowledging the reality of that period. I mean, seriously, compare Peggy to any of her real life counterparts of that period and she falls terribly short.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:44 (sixteen years ago)

I mean, seriously, compare Peggy to any of her real life counterparts of that period and she falls terribly short.

This is an intriguing line of reasoning and I think you may be on to something.

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:46 (sixteen years ago)

Isn't Peggy depicted as having the same "pull ad-magic from nowhere" superpower that Don has? They have the same mutant gene, which real non-fictional people don't have.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:48 (sixteen years ago)

i do think we are beginning to see a bit of that frustration in peggy, though. for example, her less enlightened secretary, a woman, doesn't even really respect her, and she hasn't been able to get joan - usually gung ho to be snarky - to really reprimand her.

tehresa, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:49 (sixteen years ago)

Haha that reminds me that there's a story about a famous children's book editor named Ursula Nordstrom. She was already the publisher and editor-in-chief of Harper & Row Books for Tots when she was asked to make the coffee in a meeting of the other (all-male) directors. She said, "I don't know how" and left it at that.

The Lion's Mane Jellyfish, pictured here with its only natural predator (Laurel), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:51 (sixteen years ago)

I wonder if Weiner is going to basically make Peggy decide whether it wants to take advantage of newfound freedoms or newfound opportunities. It's unlikely that she'll be allowed both.

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:52 (sixteen years ago)

Oh, yeah, Melissa, I actually wanted to say something about that! You're totally right -- it seems like the one big bend the show has made is to take up a female character who gets ahead. It's not a huge bend -- a while ago you could look at any number of rare hard-assed successful older women in a lot of industries, do some math in your head, and realize that holy crap, this woman managed to punch through that wall in like 1962 -- but it's pretty clearly an attempt to follow something rare.

I differ a little bit in objecting to that very strongly, though -- I think the show has done a little, at various points, to show how much focus Peggy puts into that position, how much she's resented or seen as humorless by the people around her, how conscious she is about it. Usually in subtle ways, but still. I guess the other thing is that I actually don't know that all the women who broke through at that time were necessarily hard and determined from the get-go -- I can certainly imagine some who, like Peggy, get the shot because they're smart and have some useful ideas, and then sit down determinedly in their little offices doing the little "women's"-type jobs over a long, long slog, way longer than their male colleagues ever have to wait for anything. (I mean, keep in mind, she got her shot because no one else had much of a clue or care about women's products, right?)

nabisco, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:55 (sixteen years ago)

Isn't Peggy depicted as having the same "pull ad-magic from nowhere" superpower that Don has?

this is an interesting counter to Melissa's point about Peggy not reflecting her real-life counterparts - NO ONE in the agency is shown as being successful by dint of their own hard work and initiative, male or female (possible exception: Joan?). Almost all of them are muddling through some combination of established privelege and luck, and most of them don't really know or fully comprehend why they are in the positions they are in (see: the TV guy, Cosgrove, Pete, etc.) Peggy and Don, however, are where they are not by dint of hard work but because they have some strange, ineffable ability to reach into the unconscious and pull out something that dazzles other people, which is borne more of their willingness to exploit themselves and their personal issues than anything else.

x-posts

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:57 (sixteen years ago)

(But yeah, I think it's a very modern bend to try and have Peggy be smart but relatable to average viewers, and to manipulate strict realism to get her an unlikely shot)

nabisco, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:58 (sixteen years ago)

can we talk about MAD MEN on AMC?

cozwn, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 21:59 (sixteen years ago)

(But on the other hand isn't that kind of going-out-of-its-way part of what you're saying it should be doing?)

nabisco, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:01 (sixteen years ago)

Did you read any of the bios of other female copywriters of that period and even prior to that period that I linked? It sounds like pretty much all of them came in with that ambition (and the other big difference is that all of them were college-educated).

I realize that Caroline R. Jones had double the hurdles that Peggy has had to jump over to prove herself, but she was a black woman in 1963 working at one of the top ad agencies as a copywriter, and she got there from the secretarial pool after repeatedly asking for chances to prove herself, and once she got there, it sounds like she spent every waking hour figuring out the history of advertising, the formulas of advertising, and assessing other ads down to the colors presented and the number of words in those ads to figure out, down to the slightest detail, what the most successful ads had in common. All in an environment where most of her co-workers barely talked to her, and in which she had no mentors or support. I don't see that in Peggy or in Peggy's story. She's clever and sometimes people kind of don't take her seriously, but they seem to pretty amiably get over it.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:06 (sixteen years ago)

Tossing out 'House of Mirth' for anti-semitism without gleaning something from it is akin to never reading history 'cause people used to be such dicks in the past.

not really, no - Wharton is often so right on about class & gender & other stuff that her anti-semitism rings bizarrely - and reminds us that the whole "the past is a different country" line is often trotted out to make excuses for people who should have known better, who we want to like & don't want to admit ought to have known better. if not everyone in the past was racist (and not everyone was), then "those were different times" only excuses racism so much (protip: not much). Ms. Wharton, on her deathbed, is said to have spent some of her final hours denouncing the Jews. plenty of great writers from her era, or earlier, managed to at least keep their anti-Semitism to themselves & not waste whole characters (not to speak of characters who're instrumental in the action) on airing their hatred, as EW does in House of Mirth. so as much as I've previously adored her writing, the bloom kinda left the rose in the middle of that book, and I switched over to Willa Cather, who's a better writer and miraculously manages not to trouble the reader with her accounts of how devious & cunning the Jews are.

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:07 (sixteen years ago)

yeah that's true, they're mostly just dismissive of her, as opposed to being actively opposed/oppressive.

x-post

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:08 (sixteen years ago)

Ms. Wharton, on her deathbed, is said to have spent some of her final hours denouncing the Jews

wow. sounds like almost as fun as those Nixon recordings!

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:09 (sixteen years ago)

she disliked socialists and lesbians; she was something of a warmonger

goole, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:13 (sixteen years ago)

oh, sorry Melissa, I haven't really chopped through everything up there -- it's a long thread

I don't really disagree with you on this front, incidentally -- there are lots of bends and soft pedals involved with this show for sure, no question

nabisco, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:13 (sixteen years ago)

My point, John is do you wish to un-read her? Would you be richer or better off litracha-wise for not having read her?

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:14 (sixteen years ago)

"Caroline R. Jones had double the hurdles that Peggy has had to jump over to prove herself, but she was a black woman in 1963 working at one of the top ad agencies as a copywriter"

The driving theme behind the show seems to be self-re-invention and duplicity rather than triumph over adversity, so to fit in a story like hers would require her to likely go through a litany of lightening creams and hair straighteners and weird "talented mr. ripley" exercises in the mirror in order to join the ranks of the show's heroes, and frankly maybe a story like hers ought to remain unsullied by that treatment?

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:16 (sixteen years ago)

she disliked socialists and lesbians; she was something of a warmonger

^^^interpol lyric

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:16 (sixteen years ago)

If I suddenly disappear from this thread, it's because the storms have descended upon my house (apparently it's going to be a scary one).

Melissa W, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:19 (sixteen years ago)

and in which she had no mentors or support.

Her boss gave her the job and she didn't get fired. I don't know if that counts as mentorship or support but it seems more than totally left to the wolves. Also, Jones sounds like a wunderkind of sorts, which may have been necessary for a woman of color but though I agree that Peggy is given a somehat easy ride, comparatively, especially given her gender and class, she is is, perhaps not sufficiently, portrayed as being dedicated and clever. She's not really one of the boys in her attitude to work; she not only knows it won't be allowed but she takes it all more seriously knowing, as she must, that she has far more to lose.

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:21 (sixteen years ago)

Storms? Is it Bill?

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:21 (sixteen years ago)

My point, John is do you wish to un-read her? Would you be richer or better off litracha-wise for not having read her?

there's so much to read that I doubt I lose much if I cut most of the assholes out, you know? have enjoyed what I read of her, can't take a lot of pleasure from overtly anti-semitic character portraiture. feel the same way about Oliver Twist, really. if Glenn Beck writes a cracking novel, do I have to read it because people say it's good, or can I give it a pass since I wish he'd die in a fire?

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:24 (sixteen years ago)

confession though I read some Knut Hamsen this year & it was just happy hardworkin Norwegian families so I gave him a Nazi pass

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:24 (sixteen years ago)

lolz @ "Nazi pass"

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:25 (sixteen years ago)

A lot of this comes down to what tone and expectations the show sets in terms of "realism" versus which realities are particularly important to the viewer to see portrayed -- like for instance I'd imagine part of soft-pedaling Peggy's position has to do with plain old TV-narrative concerns (and maybe a desire not to reduce her character too much to just being the woman who got a copywriting job) ... I dunno.

It's interesting to me, by the way, to wonder what the show would do if it developed any black characters, in terms of the stuff it's interested in -- so far we mostly see them in a sort of accurate (given the show's perspective) background position, doing jobs the way they're supposed to (good morning, sir), but I think it'd turn out exceedingly tricky to try and treat race the way it treats other things, being more interested in how people navigated the status quo than looking outside of it. It would be really tricky and risky for them to really tackle that. I almost hope the show tries, but there's so much potential for clumsiness there.

nabisco, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:29 (sixteen years ago)

I think there would be immense potential for typical MM shenanigans if they introduced race (beyond Rachel, obviously) as long as it doesn't look forced. If we're still in the 'Invisible Man' era of this show, what are some plausible, non-heavy-handed way thse chracters or some of them or one of them could be forced to interact with an African American or a Port Rican or an Asian?

repeating cycles of smoking and cruelty (Michael White), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:33 (sixteen years ago)

Sydney Poitier is hired to hawk corn nuts

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:36 (sixteen years ago)

The question's more how could they interact in any way that was substantially revealing of the other person, I guess -- there are definitely opportunities, yeah, to show people of other races interacting with this world in ways where we as modern viewers know their public face in that interaction is not the real face.

nabisco, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:37 (sixteen years ago)

(The show has opportunities -- not used as often as they used to be, or as much as I'd like but still -- to dip into a more private sphere of women without really leaving its purview; it doesn't yet have the opportunity with race, is the thing. It shouldn't suddenly follow Hollis home, you know?)

nabisco, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:39 (sixteen years ago)

One reason why MM might not be going where Melissa would like it to is that David Chase, Weiner's mentor, already kind of went there:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I%27ll_Fly_Away_(TV_series)

S3 hasn't started yet in the UK. I have always thought that the way the women in the series block and check *each other* was much more interesting than any of the contemporaneous/institutionalized Shut Up Little Lady they might get from the men.

gossip and complaints (suzy), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:40 (sixteen years ago)

has anyone read/heard a reaction to show by someone who was actually an adult in the early '60s? Curious how much of the show's appeal depends on the time being kind of mythical to the viewer.

da croupier, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:45 (sixteen years ago)


has anyone read/heard a reaction to show by someone who was actually an adult in the early '60s? Curious how much of the show's appeal depends on the time being kind of mythical to the viewer.

you missed a golden opportunity to say to a # of us here f'rexample me: "J0hn, you were in your twenties in the early 60s, does the show strike you as realistic?"

Man Is Nairf! (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:55 (sixteen years ago)

i'll admit a morbz ref was tempting

da croupier, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:55 (sixteen years ago)

have always thought that the way the women in the series block and check *each other* was much more interesting

totally agree with this - Peggy's really isolated (as has been noted), the other women resent her or are actively jealous, the men don't know what to make of her because she doesn't exploit her sexuality a la Joan, etc.

I note that no one's mentioned the phone operator who leaked the news about the sale to the accounts guys and then demanded that she be promoted in exchange. (Was actually hoping to see her in the secretarial pool in S3 and thought I may have spotted her, but wasn't sure...)

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:56 (sixteen years ago)

I haven't talked to either of my parents about this show, but neither of them were remotely close to this kind of professional world at the time (dad was in the army, mom was a social worker)

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:56 (sixteen years ago)

Well, my parents were 18 in 1962 and mom's uncle was the art director of Minneapolis' largest ad agency at the time. She says the attitudes and office etiquette are both spot-on. So are the clothes, but I have only to go to a wardrobe full of stuff Mom's handed over to me from that time to know it.

gossip and complaints (suzy), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:58 (sixteen years ago)

ut I have only to go to a wardrobe full of stuff Mom's handed over to me from that time to know it.

^^^jealous

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 22:59 (sixteen years ago)

One reason why MM might not be going where Melissa would like it to is that David Chase, Weiner's mentor, already kind of went there:

Had no idea that David Chase wrote for I'll Fly Away, but just because there was a show 15 years ago about a black woman in the civil-rights era doesn't mean that the territory is well-trod, especially since the rural South is a lot different from Madison Avenue.

jaymc, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 23:02 (sixteen years ago)

Glad to see on that Wiki page that the creators of I'll Fly Away mention that To Kill a Mockingbird was the inspiration. I was already watching the TV show when I read Mockingbird in 9th grade and so my initial image of Atticus Finch was Sam Waterston.

jaymc, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 23:05 (sixteen years ago)

Lois (phone operator) had already had a shot at being a secretary - she was totally incompetent as Don's and was busted back down to the switchboard.

I started working (local newspaper, then GM) about 15 years post-MM-era and faced down a lot of the same sexism and attacks rather than support from other, older women, especially at GM. I relate to Peggy on that front - you just did the work, ignored the comments as much as possible, and leveraged the fact that management really didn't know what to make of you by gradually taking on more and more responsibility. Though at approx. half the pay.

Jaq, Wednesday, 19 August 2009 23:11 (sixteen years ago)

Lois (phone operator) had already had a shot at being a secretary - she was totally incompetent as Don's and was busted back down to the switchboard.

oh shit that's right! Good catch. Huh, wonder what they have in store for her...

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 23:12 (sixteen years ago)

OK, jaymc, I just don't think a guy who shows a spec script to a mentor (in 2000) would want to write too closely to that mentor's 7-year-old series (in 2000); there are sincerer forms of flattery. Don't think the show was about one black woman in the same way MM is not just about Draper.

Shakey, I'm going to make the jealousy worse: some of it still had c. 1963 Peck&Peck price tags on when it was given to me.

Uncle Bill the ad-man was a model of Puritanical restraint compared with MM guys; his kids were not allowed to listen to rock'n'roll or to watch television BUT yes he was totally an immigrant's son who tried really hard to pass as a WASP and enjoyed a strong post-work tallboy made by Aunt Lucille. However he was also a very talented landscape painter (LOL Minnesota) and although he sold work for pretty decent $$$ the commercial art brought him even more immediate rewards.

gossip and complaints (suzy), Wednesday, 19 August 2009 23:16 (sixteen years ago)

nabisco bringing lots of goodness to the clusterfuck. melissa also being pretty good.

But I've got to say that Melissa's arguments make for a good show that isn't this one, and I think we'll always come back to the desire to explore one direction while I think you're ignoring the other things it is exploring.

The Peggy thing is far more fascinating to me than what otherwise might amount to a hokey biopic about overcoming the odds. She is flawed, but she's also growing. Her awakening is happening slowly, bit by bit, and since the Weiner himself has sad that his desire is to show how some of the events of the period affected these particular characters in their particular world, I can't blame it for that.

Melissa is going to get shit from the Stans, and I'm kind of one of them fwiw, but I don't think it's just because she's dissing the show. I think these people start off as types but develop into a whole lot more. Peggy begins just out of secretary school and is trying to find her place. She realizes after a couple episodes that it isn't want Joan thinks is the best option, and that she wants more. Joan works within the system to attain the power and status she wants, but she's eventually caught out by realizing that there's levels beyond where she is. Peggy decides she wants more, gets it, but then realizes that she has to do the same thing as Joan to some extent, by working with what she's got in a society that views her a certain way. Peggy is informed by her conservative, Catholic background quite a bit, but I think her modesty and seeming passivity belies a real ambition that's subtly brought out as opposed to being depicted in a real overt fashion (that would grate). If you want proto-feminism, look no further than her speech to Pete at the end of Season 2. She came into the office half expecting that the best she could do was find a husband because that's what Joan told her, but she grew past that. She gave up her child and her very real chance to get Pete because she wanted 'different things'. Her ambition and intelligence caused her to eschew the usual desires of a young female (within the Mad Men universe, but it isn't that beyond belief) to have a husband and family to move up in her job and to make something different of herself. Along the way there are costs, in that she loses the comfort of the church which was obviously a warm blanket to her previously. I'd rather have a conflicted character going through complex problems than a straightforward inspirational character who defied the odds, partly because it's more interesting and partly because it fits within the universe the show has created. I'm not saying that the story Melissa wants to tell isn't interesting, or that it couldn't be done with the same complexity, I should think it isn't what this show is.

And because of that I think there's a lot of hostility towards Melissa's arguments. This is a smart show that is critiquing the culture it's depicting in a very sharp and interesting manner. It's certainly interested in showing the bad side to the misogyny, etc..., and I think it is also deconstructing a romantic ideal of the past. It's an extremely intelligent show, and it might befuddle some fans that someone would have a problem with it not going far enough in a very particular direction, and that is cause enough to write it off.

Personally, I really hope it runs with this brits v yanks thing. Weiner has stated that America is a big theme here, and I love how the Brits break down the romantic view of London Fog (Ad Men sell it as exotic and exciting when in reality it was poisonous and representative of real class oppression). I want this series to move like Deadwood, which took the town as a microcosm of how American Community developed, as well as the Wire which takes Baltimore as a microcosm of how the underclass are treated. Mad Men is an extraordinarily intelligent show, both in social commentary and in technical/narrative/thematic construction (see Maidenform for example). There are interesting points being made against it, although I don't really agree with them, but knocking it back completely is to do a disservice to what it does do, and that's make a compelling, smart drama that is heads and shoulders above most of what the rest of the networks are producing, including HBO (True Blood...seriously?).

I know I'm reiterating what has already been said but this thread has taken up far too much of my day and if I don't contribute something I'll feel like I've wasted more of my time than I already have.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Thursday, 20 August 2009 00:23 (sixteen years ago)

apologies for typos and words that shouldn't be there. been drinking and whatnot.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Thursday, 20 August 2009 00:25 (sixteen years ago)

wow you guys are fucking nuts

cutty, Thursday, 20 August 2009 00:53 (sixteen years ago)

The hostility towards Melissa is due to the fact that she's repeating the same fucking thing over and over, and whenever someone addresses her point she ignores it and doesn't engage. About 20 people have already said exactly what you did about how Mad Men is about a specific group of people in a bubble and to make some token effort to incorporate the civil rights struggle into the show would be awkward at best and likely patronizing in a Forrest Gump/check all the boxes sort of way.

Again, a number of people have said that, and yet Melissa's argument is still the same as it was when she first graced us with her presence.

musically, Thursday, 20 August 2009 01:00 (sixteen years ago)

Again, a number of people have said that, and yet Melissa's argument is still the same as it was when she first graced us with her presence.

I know, but goddammit if I didn't waste a lot of time today reading this thread. I just had stuff bundled up inside from earlier, and since it's been clusterfucked for a while, why not?

I understand the problem that Melissa hasn't really moved on past her original argument, nor acknowledged rebuttals very much (she has to an extent, in fairness, but not nearly enough considering how much she's repeating the same thing), but I also think it's important to underline how said rebuttals aren't necessarily stans raving and getting upset that someone dares to speak against their (our?) precious show.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Thursday, 20 August 2009 01:28 (sixteen years ago)

I actually kinda don't like this show, actually. Ultimately.

In any case it's not like a "clusterfuck" when people bother typing out considered opinions on a topic -- I'm not sure why we even consider stuff some kind of trainwreck just because people are posting quickly and actually getting passionate about an argument. The only trainwrecky component is when people aren't understanding one another and spinning off into animosity and there's more heat than light, but that stage is pretty clearly long past on this one.

nabisco, Thursday, 20 August 2009 01:52 (sixteen years ago)

you're right, it isn't that clusterfucky, but the rough bits don't seem that long ago when you've read them in one go. i don't think there's been any trolling, so those arguments are ridic.

i think part of me is trying to reconcile the argument that this show doesn't portray women as three dimensional characters. i see a lot of feminism here, if not reflected in the character's actions themselves (thought certainly in some), then at least in their representation. i understand that i might see feminism in a different light, but it still strikes me as...unexpected.

The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Thursday, 20 August 2009 02:05 (sixteen years ago)

(I'm still kind of lolling at the unexpected revelation of Shakey Mo Period-Crossdresser upthread)

nate dogg is a feeling (HI DERE), Thursday, 20 August 2009 02:12 (sixteen years ago)

i think the feeling of clusterfuck springs from the fact that we have been having essentially the same argument for 2 days, repeated ad nauseam (i'm guilty of this, too) instead of the normal tv show chatter. the arguments were considered at first maybe, but now they're just overkill?
xpost

tehresa, Thursday, 20 August 2009 04:09 (sixteen years ago)

has anyone read/heard a reaction to show by someone who was actually an adult in the early '60s? Curious how much of the show's appeal depends on the time being kind of mythical to the viewer.

i read one article talking to actual ad men of the era, whose reactions ranged from, "poppycock! it wasn't anything like that at all!" to "yeah, that's about right."

flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 20 August 2009 04:32 (sixteen years ago)

obv the poppycockers were trying to cover up the fact that they were lolhueg assholes!

tehresa, Thursday, 20 August 2009 04:36 (sixteen years ago)

I remember when Far From Heaven came out, critics in gay papers complaining Dennis Quaid's closeted executive didn't have "enough agency," like that would've been plausible in 1957.

One of the agencies I worked for merged w/ some Brit operation, but obv I wasn't privy to behind-closed-doors intrigue...
And the CEOs of both agencies were women (both thought of as total monsters by the creative staff).

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 20 August 2009 04:50 (sixteen years ago)

(hey, 2 diff meanings of agency, amazing what gets by you when yer half-awake)

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 20 August 2009 04:51 (sixteen years ago)

(I'm still kind of lolling at the unexpected revelation of Shakey Mo Period-Crossdresser upthread)

lolz that wasn't *exactly* what I meant but who am I to tether your overly fertile imagination...

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:09 (sixteen years ago)

Well part of what I do like about this show is that it allows for these kinds of conversations, which obviously I find pretty interesting -- but yeah, definitely better for it to roll forward into a discussion and not just arguing the same point.

nabisco, Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:17 (sixteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-fowGiYk5E

kill puppies when the kicking stops (Nicole), Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:21 (sixteen years ago)

was kinda shocked to learn that Jon Hamm is a year younger than me when dude looks like 10 years older

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 20 August 2009 18:25 (sixteen years ago)

the effects of daytime drinking and smoking!

tehresa, Thursday, 20 August 2009 19:15 (sixteen years ago)

that delivery of "everyone's gotta be something" was pretty don draperish

jerk store (hmmmm), Friday, 21 August 2009 02:16 (sixteen years ago)

was kinda shocked to learn that Jon Hamm is a year younger than me when dude looks like 10 years older

Doesn't it seem like most images of midcentury American 35-year-olds now look about 50 to our eyes? Maybe this explains why most of our movie stars are overgrown boys? (Cruise, DiCaprio, Hanks, Pitt etc)

Indiana Morbs and the Curse of the Ivy League Chorister (Dr Morbius), Friday, 21 August 2009 02:27 (sixteen years ago)

Hanks is an overgrown boy with a receding hairline though.

Alex in SF, Friday, 21 August 2009 02:39 (sixteen years ago)

None of those guys resemble boys to me except maybe DiCaprio.

irreconcilable aesthetic criteria (Eric H.), Friday, 21 August 2009 02:39 (sixteen years ago)

Anyway, just started watching today (S1E1) and I could definitely see getting into it, but some of the winking "LOL, 1960!" bits are way more overstated than I'd have liked.

irreconcilable aesthetic criteria (Eric H.), Friday, 21 August 2009 02:40 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah Dicaprio/Depp both have that hard to believe they have to shave look.

Alex in SF, Friday, 21 August 2009 02:41 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/2009/08/20/mad-men-bmw-ad/

in excelsis ayo (roxymuzak), Monday, 24 August 2009 03:11 (sixteen years ago)

looks pretty white to me

velko, Monday, 24 August 2009 03:21 (sixteen years ago)

Anyway, just started watching today (S1E1) and I could definitely see getting into it, but some of the winking "LOL, 1960!" bits are way more overstated than I'd have liked.

― irreconcilable aesthetic criteria (Eric H.), Thursday, August 20, 2009 9:40 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

honestly i can totally see this show being pretty o_O seemingly indefensible for the first few episodes. you struggle to look for a kind of moral baseline or handhold into this world, struggling to figure out exactly what the show is trying to tell you.

butthurt (deej), Monday, 24 August 2009 08:55 (sixteen years ago)

anyone (jhoshea) who acts like the brilliance is self-evident minutes into watching yr first episode is nuts

butthurt (deej), Monday, 24 August 2009 08:56 (sixteen years ago)

its obv the show is amazing from the 1st ep - then it just gets better - lol 60s complaints are purely fools desperately searching for a critical angle

― ice cr?m, Friday, November 28, 2008 8:27 AM (8 months ago) Bookmark

awful post

butthurt (deej), Monday, 24 August 2009 08:58 (sixteen years ago)

Hey tonight's episode was much better than the premiere! Sigh of relief, here.

Jouster, Monday, 24 August 2009 09:08 (sixteen years ago)

i started avoiding this thread once i saw where it was going, but i came back to it tonight because i couldn't sleep. yikes, guys.

anyway, here's why mad men is interesting to me, personally, once i move the cool '60s "window dressing" aside.

for some reason, rich conservative white people continue to fascinate me, even though (or because?) i'm tired of their pop-cultural predominance, and sense of social entitlement, and ability to grab national headlines when they do something as quotidian as "disappear" or "get murdered." i am a white person, of eastern-european jewish extraction. i always check off "white, non-hispanic" on forms. i'm well aware it's much much much easier for me to "pass" in that way than for a poc. plus, i'm generally well-schooled (public mostly), and i like to believe i'm better at cocktail parties than any of those country club protestant fucktards on the show.

but i still feel like an outsider in america. i'm a non-christian (like rachel menken), an outer-borough girl from scrappy immigrant stock (like peggy), and my political views are left-of-center (uh, like that kennedy-supporting neighbor that betty hated). i watch the show because the "old rich white guy" stuff is both foreign to me and all too familiar, and i want the outsider-ish types to poke through those glass ceilings, whether or not they "deserve to." i want to see the aristocracy start to crumble and i believe that some day it can finish crumbling and we won't have any more snippy anti-sotomayor sorta crap from those circles.

sally draper (get bent), Monday, 24 August 2009 11:13 (sixteen years ago)

of course a lot of americans are from scrappy immigrant stock, but many QUOTE UNQUOTE REAL AMERICANS conveniently forget their ancestry.

sally draper (get bent), Monday, 24 August 2009 11:18 (sixteen years ago)

Anyone know where I can find a t*rr*nt of yesterday's episode? Doesn't appear to be on Isohunt.

Tuncay Stryder (Matt DC), Monday, 24 August 2009 15:12 (sixteen years ago)

what is the deal is no one t*rr*nting this

just sayin, Monday, 24 August 2009 17:21 (sixteen years ago)

good episode

I have never seen Bye Bye Birdie, was that clip from a credit sequence or something?

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 24 August 2009 18:16 (sixteen years ago)

also lolz how badly does Don want a dad

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 24 August 2009 18:18 (sixteen years ago)

the scene when peggy was singing to herself in the mirror...

cutty, Monday, 24 August 2009 18:30 (sixteen years ago)

anybody figure out the significance of don touching the grass when watching the teacher dance around the pole with the kids?

cutty, Monday, 24 August 2009 18:30 (sixteen years ago)

he wants to smoke grass... while the teacher dances around his "pole" (dick)

fleetwood (max), Monday, 24 August 2009 18:31 (sixteen years ago)

barefoot-grass-pagan spring ritual-rebirth

eh who knows

(mostly I was thinking "jesus Don don't bang yr kids' teacher")

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 24 August 2009 18:31 (sixteen years ago)

btw the scene w/ bettys dad pouring the booze down the sink was imo 10000000000000X better a way to inject some sense of historical continuity than all the depression-era flashbacks

fleetwood (max), Monday, 24 August 2009 18:33 (sixteen years ago)

he's getting ideas for the patio diet soda ad campaign. (xpost, what shakey said.)

sally draper (get bent), Monday, 24 August 2009 18:34 (sixteen years ago)

yeah tbh I was expecting the last scene with him and Peggy to be a pitch for the Patio thing but then it just.. ended

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 24 August 2009 18:35 (sixteen years ago)

yeah, i got that too. i think he was getting the same feeling he got from the BBB clip. but what was the significance of him coming to work and staring at peggy, though?

does he agree with her now about the direction the campaign should go?

cutty, Monday, 24 August 2009 18:35 (sixteen years ago)

Apparently the Browning poem this episode references provides some insight, but I have too much work to do right now to verify that claim.

Your heartbeat soun like sasquatch feet (polyphonic), Monday, 24 August 2009 18:40 (sixteen years ago)

ann-margret = shrill desperation for a man through the voice of untamed youth

the pagan teacher and the kids = the same untamed youth thing, but people (women) are enjoying themselves and don't NEED anything external to that awesome moment

sally draper (get bent), Monday, 24 August 2009 18:45 (sixteen years ago)

the underlying message is that they NEED the product because it will make them feel that way for all tiemz, but it sets up a nicely different binary than "a woman is miserable without a man to save her."

sally draper (get bent), Monday, 24 August 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)

Browning poem...? I missed that

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 24 August 2009 18:48 (sixteen years ago)

Where the quiet-coloured end of evening smiles,
Miles and miles
On the solitary pastures where our sheep
Half-asleep
Tinkle homeward thro' the twilight, stray or stop
As they crop--
Was the site once of a city great and gay,
(So they say)
Of our country's very capital, its prince
Ages since
Held his court in, gathered councils, wielding far
Peace or war.

II.
Now,--the country does not even boast a tree,
As you see,
To distinguish slopes of verdure, certain rills
From the hills
Intersect and give a name to, (else they run
Into one)
Where the domed and daring palace shot its spires
Up like fires
O'er the hundred-gated circuit of a wall
Bounding all,
Made of marble, men might march on nor be pressed,
Twelve abreast.

III.
And such plenty and perfection, see, of grass
Never was!
Such a carpet as, this summer-time, o'erspreads
And embeds
Every vestige of the city, guessed alone,
Stock or stone--
Where a multitude of men breathed joy and woe
Long ago;
Lust of glory pricked their hearts up, dread of shame
Struck them tame;
And that glory and that shame alike, the gold
Bought and sold.

IV.
Now,--the single little turret that remains
On the plains,
By the caper overrooted, by the gourd
Overscored,
While the patching houseleek's head of blossom winks
Through the chinks--
Marks the basement whence a tower in ancient time
Sprang sublime,
And a burning ring, all round, the chariots traced
As they raced,
And the monarch and his minions and his dames
Viewed the games.

V.
And I know, while thus the quiet-coloured eve
Smiles to leave
To their folding, all our many-tinkling fleece
In such peace,
And the slopes and rills in undistinguished grey
Melt away--
That a girl with eager eyes and yellow hair
Waits me there
In the turret whence the charioteers caught soul
For the goal,
When the king looked, where she looks now, breathless, dumb
Till I come.

VI.
But he looked upon the city, every side,
Far and wide,
All the mountains topped with temples, all the glades'
Colonnades,
All the causeys, bridges, aqueducts,--and then,
All the men!
When I do come, she will speak not, she will stand,
Either hand
On my shoulder, give her eyes the first embrace
Of my face,
Ere we rush, ere we extinguish sight and speech
Each on each.

VII.
In one year they sent a million fighters forth
South and North,
And they built their gods a brazen pillar high
As the sky,
Yet reserved a thousand chariots in full force--
Gold, of course.
Oh heart! oh blood that freezes, blood that burns!
Earth's returns
For whole centuries of folly, noise and sin!
Shut them in,
With their triumphs and their glories and the rest!
Love is best.

go Nick go! Scrub that paint! Scrub it!! Yeah!! (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 24 August 2009 18:50 (sixteen years ago)

what part of the episode was that ... ?

dmr, Monday, 24 August 2009 19:50 (sixteen years ago)

The title of the episode is the title of that poem.

Your heartbeat soun like sasquatch feet (polyphonic), Monday, 24 August 2009 19:53 (sixteen years ago)

Can't wait for this to start in the UK, just spoke to Mom and forgot to ask her about further impressions of Uncle Bill's ad agency.

lacoste intolerant (suzy), Monday, 24 August 2009 21:02 (sixteen years ago)

i am surprised at the lack of commenting compared to after the first episode.

i loved, loved, loved episode 2. soooo much great dialogue... and a lot of awkwardness! (Peggy in the mirror, Don talking to Betty's brother, every conversation about MSG)

also, Peggy has legs.

t0dd swiss, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 03:17 (sixteen years ago)

Don talking to Betty's brother

I always love it when Don lays the law on someone.

every conversation about MSG

Paul earned respect 4EVA

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 03:34 (sixteen years ago)

lol calling Paul 'the communist'

Batsman (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 03:43 (sixteen years ago)

Don laying down the law on Betty's brother was especially sweet for two reasons.

1. Betty's brother (or was it his wife) saying that Don has no say in the decision.
2. Betty's brother is such a douche.

I really preferred the Don in this episode. He wasn't the same old character that women always fall for, like in the first episode. This was Don being Don. On top of his game at work and then sticking up for Betty. I thought it was a very sweet move, whether it was just a pragmatic move or not. And then being pissed about the MSG account. That is Don Draper.

t0dd swiss, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 03:51 (sixteen years ago)

i liked peggy's assertion of her sexuality, and her control over it. wonder if she's going to go on the pill sometime this season.

flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 04:20 (sixteen years ago)

every conversation about MSG

Paul earned respect 4EVA

yeah, for sure. the MSG blunder was the beginning of the end of faux-progressive mid-century "urban renewal" in new york. MSG itself did turn out to be a successful economic development engine, but it's largely responsible for how ugly and dumpy-looking that neighborhood looks now. interesting that the show also mentioned the '64/'65 new york world's fair, which would be mean old robert moses' attempt at a last stand, as he was staring his future irrelevance in the face.

sally draper (get bent), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 04:23 (sixteen years ago)

wonder if she's going to go on the pill sometime this season.

Didn't that happen in the first episode of the first season?

joygoat, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 04:33 (sixteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1bPoSEii2M

sally draper (get bent), Tuesday, 25 August 2009 04:40 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, but we all know how well THAT (going on the pill) turned out. Presumably she let her prescription lapse shortly after giving birth.

Also, I've taken the liberty of starting a whole NEW thread, since this one's gotten pretty damn unwieldy and clusterfucky:

can we talk about MAD MEN on AMC on this NEW thread ('cause the original one's getting way too long)

Myonga Vön Bontee, Tuesday, 25 August 2009 04:50 (sixteen years ago)

anyone (jhoshea) who acts like the brilliance is self-evident minutes into watching yr first episode is nuts

― butthurt (deej), Monday, August 24, 2009 4:56 AM (4 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

fyi its harder for stupids to pick up on this sort of thing - thats why we call them stupids (deej)

ice cr?m, Friday, 28 August 2009 16:50 (sixteen years ago)

http://1.media.tumblr.com/JMgEpYg0Pq477ujyDnrUkwMJo1_500.jpg

crutie can't fail (roxymuzak), Friday, 28 August 2009 21:49 (sixteen years ago)

To bad he can't fucking think.

joygoat, Friday, 28 August 2009 22:16 (sixteen years ago)

headline in my school paper's entertainment section: "Mad Men illuminates darker side of '60s culture"

fo shza my tza (Curt1s Stephens), Monday, 31 August 2009 03:09 (sixteen years ago)

"Mad Men darkens illuminated side of 60's culture"

or have I become completely absurd? (kenan), Monday, 31 August 2009 04:57 (sixteen years ago)

Really someone needs to lock this thread. This is confusing.

or have I become completely absurd? (kenan), Monday, 31 August 2009 05:07 (sixteen years ago)

ok

mystic mod, Monday, 31 August 2009 05:09 (sixteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.