who would u fuk?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

of the top 100 posters this month

Poll Results

OptionVotes
the schef (adam schefter ha ha)15
ILX System 9
Masonic Boom 8
Trayce 5
sanskrit 5
Geir Hongro 5
Rubyredd 5
river wolf 5
tehresa 4
jergïns 4
Abbott 4
Beth Parker 4
KitCat 4
Just got offed 3
Drooone 3
Alfred, Lord Sotosyn 3
Surmounter 3
n/a 3
hstencil 2
rrrobyn 2
latebloomer 2
Laurel 2
nabisco 2
That one guy that hit it and quit it 2
scott seward 2
bell_labs 2
nathalie 2
Noodle Vague2
gr8080 2
Dr Morbius 2
ghost rider 2
kingfish 1
gershy 1
max 1
HI DERE 1
ken c 1
elmo argonaut 1
wanko ergo sum 1
Jordan Sargent 1
chicago kevin 1
accentmonkey 1
Dom Passantino 1
Tape Store 1
kv_nol 1
chaki 1
and what 1
Tracer Hand 1
Jordan 1
Curt1s Stephens 1
El Tomboto 1
jhøshea 1
s1ocki 1
BIG HOOS aka the steendriver 1
mark s 0
Mr. Que 0
Hurting 2 0
Richard Wood Johnson 0
Steve Shasta 0
Heave Ho 0
dean ge 0
stevienixed 0
John Justen 0
Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃 0
Charlie Howard 0
Whiney G. Weingarten 0
kenan 0
bernard snowy 0
Alex in NYC 0
Tom D. 0
Bimble 0
Jeff Treppel 0
Ned Raggett 0
aldo 0
RJG 0
humansuit 0
King Boy Pato 0
Shakey Mo Collier 0
deej 0
Jon Lewis 0
Ms Misery 0
jaymc 0
StanM 0
sweet tater 0
gabbneb 0
dan m 0
Stevie D 0
Herman G. Neuname 0
Mark G 0
Sara R-C 0
Alex in Baltimore 0
get bent 0
Jesse 0
poortheatre 0
am0n 0
ailsa 0
milo z 0
blueski 0
marmotwolof 0
Eazy 0
Matt DC 0


kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 19:55 (eighteen years ago)

Would you fuck me? I'd fuck me. I'd fuck me hard.

dan m, Thursday, 9 August 2007 19:56 (eighteen years ago)

go ILX system, you fine piece of meat.

jessie monster, Thursday, 9 August 2007 19:57 (eighteen years ago)

ILX System, and I'd do it cold sober!

Johnny Fever, Thursday, 9 August 2007 19:57 (eighteen years ago)

"fuk me" campaigns begin here. you have until september.

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 19:57 (eighteen years ago)

I think the top ten should all just fuck each other

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 19:58 (eighteen years ago)

I'm pretty glad I'm not an option.

jessie monster, Thursday, 9 August 2007 19:58 (eighteen years ago)

UH HEY DUDE NO.
xpost

John Justen, Thursday, 9 August 2007 19:59 (eighteen years ago)

Holy hell, how did my name get in that list?!

Jeff Treppel, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:00 (eighteen years ago)

Man I wish I had posted more. I love hot internet fukage (pronounced french, like fuh-KAHJ -- or alternatively japanese, like bukkake with an F -- perhaps this should be the next poll).

Will M., Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:01 (eighteen years ago)

bukfkake?

Abbott, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:02 (eighteen years ago)

That's totally not what I meant and you know it, you should be ashamed of yourself

Will M., Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:02 (eighteen years ago)

bu-fucky

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:03 (eighteen years ago)

you can just guess what that's short for

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:03 (eighteen years ago)

how will I ever choose!??

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:03 (eighteen years ago)

you guys who are voting ILX System all realize you're just getting JW's sloppy seconds right

El Tomboto, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:03 (eighteen years ago)

YUMZ

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:03 (eighteen years ago)

bu-fucky

-- kenan, Thursday, August 9, 2007 8:03 PM (37 seconds ago) Bookmark Link

is that your snake's name?

Mr. Que, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:04 (eighteen years ago)

yes. i drew lightning bolts on the sides.

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:05 (eighteen years ago)

BOSS. FUCKING BOSS SNAKE BRAH.

Abbott, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.octanecreative.com/ducttape/cookin/images/bratwurst.jpg

Mr. Que, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)

What kind of pet snake do you have? My friend has the cutest orange corn snake that chilled in the hood of my jacket for a long time.

Abbott, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:07 (eighteen years ago)

ALERT. DO NOT ALLOW KENANS SNAKE TO CHILL IN YOUR JACKET HOOD. ALERT.

John Justen, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:08 (eighteen years ago)

HONGRO

Dom Passantino, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:09 (eighteen years ago)

Does this poll take hate fucks into account?

dan m, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)

it doesn't specify against them

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)

Where is Jessica H4rvell?

REDO POLL

Jordan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)

http://i72.photobucket.com/albums/i191/fluxion23/marksausage.jpg

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:11 (eighteen years ago)

i deserve that, for making fun of yr snake

Mr. Que, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:12 (eighteen years ago)

jesus fucking christ

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:13 (eighteen years ago)

!!!

river wolf, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:13 (eighteen years ago)

Yep. Images off, yer my best pal.

John Justen, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:14 (eighteen years ago)

that really looks like i've entered some weird german porn snuff brat film

Mr. Que, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:15 (eighteen years ago)

no, it doesn't look like a particularly weird german porn snuff brat film.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:19 (eighteen years ago)

oooh, I'm glad with this poll already, my name is right in between tehresa and Laurel

*homer simpson love growl*

</perv>

StanM, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:20 (eighteen years ago)

that sandwich is all about the bread

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:23 (eighteen years ago)

if you've already voted for yourself you can go home.

El Tomboto, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:24 (eighteen years ago)

LOL I know (xpost)

StanM, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:25 (eighteen years ago)

this is really just headed in the wrong direction.

jessie monster, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:25 (eighteen years ago)

no, it doesn't look like a particularly weird german porn snuff brat film.

HA! No, it's the the standard old movie that's like "No! No more bratwurst! Oh the weltschmerz!" You know the drill.

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:26 (eighteen years ago)

too busy to post the past month = no unanticipated fuks for me :/

Rock Hardy, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:27 (eighteen years ago)

ILX ORGEE

http://blogs.indiewire.com/twhalliii/shortbus.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:28 (eighteen years ago)

no, it doesn't look like a particularly weird german porn snuff brat film.

-- the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, August 9, 2007 8:19 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

yr just jealous b/c u can't be in my weird german porn suff brat film

Mr. Que, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:29 (eighteen years ago)

that is probably pretty accurate. xpost

jessie monster, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:29 (eighteen years ago)

is wanko voting for himself?

StanM, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:30 (eighteen years ago)

which one is the home one and which one is the shop one again, nathalie/stevienixed?

StanM, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:31 (eighteen years ago)

kenan = way creepier than ned, despite his protests to the contrary.

good thread, dude.

hstencil, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:31 (eighteen years ago)

Scott is on ILX hiatus, so any fuks will have to be hand-delivered to his home.

Jon Lewis, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)

I'm just bitter at Ned for snubbing me on Myspace.

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:33 (eighteen years ago)

lol, ned snubbed u?

hstencil, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:33 (eighteen years ago)

totally! When ned isn't your myspace friend, you have to question your whole online life.

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:36 (eighteen years ago)

Vote for him, maybe that'll smooth things over.

Jon Lewis, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:39 (eighteen years ago)

Sausagefest.

n/a, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)

Guess what, I voted for my wife.

n/a, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)

too late, i voted for tombot

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)

i voted for your wife too.

the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)

nude spock, guys

elmo argonaut, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:43 (eighteen years ago)

Sausagefest.

welcome 2 thee internets!

dan m, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:43 (eighteen years ago)

Guess what, I voted for my wife.

what happens when 10 other people do, too?

xpost HAHA exactly

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:43 (eighteen years ago)

I don't want to attend a keyswap party that I wasn't invited to.

Casuistry, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:46 (eighteen years ago)

http://imagecache.pixsy.com/03192007/4d/4d7b2d1f-d8a2-452c-80a8-f00d52092dd6.jpg

"You vote for my wife?"

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:46 (eighteen years ago)

Guess what, I voted for my wife.

so gay

Jordan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:50 (eighteen years ago)

This is a hard poll.

Jordan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)

VOTE CHAKI IN WHO U FUK POLE! HELP ME WIN A TRIP TO MEXICO!

chaki, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:55 (eighteen years ago)

well this isn't inappropriate or anything

why did nude spock get so many entries?

gabbneb, Thursday, 9 August 2007 20:59 (eighteen years ago)

you're inappropriate

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:04 (eighteen years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/875000/images/_879875_basilbrush_300.jpg
BOOM BOOM!

Mark G, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:05 (eighteen years ago)

THIS IS ALL VERY WELL, BUT WHO WUD U MARRY?

Just got offed, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:16 (eighteen years ago)

still tombot

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:16 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, i'd marry him in a heartbeat

Mr. Que, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:17 (eighteen years ago)

Yah I think based on previous comments I'd be the only one in the marrying kind poll.

Abbott, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:20 (eighteen years ago)

and best of all, who would you kill?

blueski, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:20 (eighteen years ago)

myself. Just to get tombot's attention. WHY DON'T YOU PAY ATTENTION TO ME ANYMORE? CAN'T YOU SEE I HAVE NEEDS?

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:21 (eighteen years ago)

The worst crime I can think of would be to rip people off by faking it and pretending as if I'm having 100% fun.

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

no matter what the outcome this poll guarantees creepy, awkward results

ghost rider, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:26 (eighteen years ago)

yes, but ANONYMOUS

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

there are hardly any british women on ilx now

blueski, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:29 (eighteen years ago)

aussies and kiwis are nice too, though

kenan, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:30 (eighteen years ago)

which one is the home one and which one is the shop one again, nathalie/stevienixed?

Nath is the one on the main computer in the shop, the stevienixed is the one I use at home or wherever I gotta log in. I rememeber my password for that one. Yes, I'm a bit mental. :-( Actually I am since I thought I had posted something about my two accounts... but apparently not. :-(

stevienixed, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:47 (eighteen years ago)

BTW the answer is myself of course.

stevienixed, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:49 (eighteen years ago)

I predict that a woman will win and feel horribly creeped out by the result.

milo z, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:51 (eighteen years ago)

ILX System is feeling very creeped out right now.

blueski, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:58 (eighteen years ago)

I predict a dude will win and few people will be concerned about the creepy factor

gabbneb, Thursday, 9 August 2007 22:04 (eighteen years ago)

Creepier if a lady wins imo

Will M., Thursday, 9 August 2007 22:10 (eighteen years ago)

I mean dude it's like "har har thanx sausage friends" and/or "see you at the gay thread later" but girls it's more like "hi dere i saw you on a WYLL thread and want to anonymously tell you where I want to put it"

Will M., Thursday, 9 August 2007 22:11 (eighteen years ago)

it is because you are a dude

gabbneb, Thursday, 9 August 2007 22:12 (eighteen years ago)

I started this poll a couple of days ago, when I thought 'dome' meant something dirty. But anyway I'd pretty much have sex with all this flickr whores and fat goths and noize babbies and senior citizens and Aja when legal.

wanko ergo sum, Thursday, 9 August 2007 22:14 (eighteen years ago)

it is because you are nude spock

gabbneb, Thursday, 9 August 2007 22:15 (eighteen years ago)

I predict that I won't vote at all.

Laurel, Thursday, 9 August 2007 22:15 (eighteen years ago)

dome does mean something dirty.

Will M., Thursday, 9 August 2007 22:17 (eighteen years ago)

I would (and hav) fuk(ed) me

ken c, Thursday, 9 August 2007 22:18 (eighteen years ago)

Thanks, btw, kenan, for posting a poll with 100 options. Good job. Moron.

ken c, Thursday, 9 August 2007 22:19 (eighteen years ago)

Are we 100% sure that fuk = fuck? Maybe kenan knows something we don't and we've all voted for something we don't understand...

StanM, Thursday, 9 August 2007 23:05 (eighteen years ago)

this board needs some chastity training

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 9 August 2007 23:06 (eighteen years ago)

i think we need a 'who would you awkwardly kiss' poll

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 9 August 2007 23:12 (eighteen years ago)

I think I'm getting junior high slumber party vibes.

Abbott, Thursday, 9 August 2007 23:17 (eighteen years ago)

http://i13.tinypic.com/4plc9cn.gif

StanM, Thursday, 9 August 2007 23:23 (eighteen years ago)

I predict that the number of males who don't get any votes and the number of votes for the winning female will be the same.

Hurting 2, Friday, 10 August 2007 00:02 (eighteen years ago)

i predict that dr. morbius has a secret admirer <3<3<3

bell_labs, Friday, 10 August 2007 00:16 (eighteen years ago)

aussies and kiwis are nice too, though

-- kenan

thanks, dude.

i predict guys be freaked about creeping out the ile girls, so the top 5 will be men. it's the interwebs so i don't find this creepy at all. but i haven't got any action in a ridiculously long time so my creeped-out factor is pretty low :/.

Rubyredd, Friday, 10 August 2007 00:17 (eighteen years ago)

[i'm aiming for the pity vote]

Rubyredd, Friday, 10 August 2007 00:27 (eighteen years ago)

I'm worries this will be like Valentine's Day in elementary school and someone will be sad about getting no valentine cards. Except instead of a little card with a picture of Shaggy surrounded by hearts saying, "Zoinks! Have a swell Valentine's!" the message is a misspelled expression of vulgarity and impersonal, awkward nudesweat.

Abbott, Friday, 10 August 2007 00:44 (eighteen years ago)

Guess what, I voted for my husband. I won't come after anybody with my jealous cat claws who also would in an imaginary internet world fuk skot. But before anybody "hand delivers" anything here, you'll have to get past me.

Maria :D, Friday, 10 August 2007 01:53 (eighteen years ago)

phew

chaki, Friday, 10 August 2007 01:55 (eighteen years ago)

i vote for skot to vote for rrobyn or Alfred.

Maria :D, Friday, 10 August 2007 02:01 (eighteen years ago)

thanks in advance to anyone who votes for me.

latebloomer, Friday, 10 August 2007 02:10 (eighteen years ago)

Now is everyone going to get all seductive to garner votes? The WDYLL thread is going to go all cheesecake.

Beth Parker, Friday, 10 August 2007 02:12 (eighteen years ago)

Richard Wood Johnson, if only for the guarantee.

Jordan Sargent, Friday, 10 August 2007 02:14 (eighteen years ago)

Beth, post a pic of yourself in an ill-fitting (skimpy) bathing suit eating cheesecake from a large smooth yellow rock whilst seated in your flower garden or in front of one of your paintings NOW. You are so going to win.

Maria :D, Friday, 10 August 2007 02:18 (eighteen years ago)

Okay. I'm going to campaign my heart out for this.

Beth Parker, Friday, 10 August 2007 02:28 (eighteen years ago)

the fact that i'm in the top 100 posters is what's worrying me more than anything. i think i need to get off the webs and uh... do stuff or something. like maybe have sex with someone.

Rubyredd, Friday, 10 August 2007 02:31 (eighteen years ago)

It'd be too obvious if I voted in this so I wont.

Trayce, Friday, 10 August 2007 03:14 (eighteen years ago)

CRUTIS WILL WIN THIS 'GOING AWAY'

ralph, Friday, 10 August 2007 03:19 (eighteen years ago)

i vote for skot to vote for rrobyn or Alfred.
-- Maria :D

Yay!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 10 August 2007 03:52 (eighteen years ago)

Will anyone choo-choo-choose me?

Hurting 2, Friday, 10 August 2007 04:10 (eighteen years ago)

i'm not even on this poll. i guess i need to post lots more and be more of a pain in the ass.

GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ, Friday, 10 August 2007 05:04 (eighteen years ago)

2 MORE MONTHS FYI

Tape Store, Friday, 10 August 2007 05:09 (eighteen years ago)

Has anyone NOT voted (and wished they could change their mind now Rubyredd is going for the pity vote) already?

StanM, Friday, 10 August 2007 08:07 (eighteen years ago)

go ILX system, you fine piece of meat.

Stay away from my inanimate piece of machinery, bitches.

Matt DC, Friday, 10 August 2007 08:14 (eighteen years ago)

curt1s 5tephens is dat hotness

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 10 August 2007 08:18 (eighteen years ago)

xpost: Doesn't it have more than one free slot?

StanM, Friday, 10 August 2007 08:23 (eighteen years ago)

And a great rack, whats a bet /nerdjoke.

Trayce, Friday, 10 August 2007 08:24 (eighteen years ago)

I predict a zero for marmotwolof!

marmotwolof, Friday, 10 August 2007 08:31 (eighteen years ago)

the fact that i'm in the top 100 posters is what's worrying me more than anything. i think i need to get off the webs and uh... do stuff or something. like maybe have sex with someone.

Haw, welcome to ILX Ruby :D You can check out but you can never etc etc.

Trayce, Friday, 10 August 2007 08:42 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, I had no idea I was posting so much lately. 203 posts in the last month!? I thought it was like 50.

marmotwolof, Friday, 10 August 2007 08:47 (eighteen years ago)

xpost: that only goes for people who live a long way away from most other posters, like we do (belgium, australia) - I bet those people on the city threads do it with each other all the time.

StanM, Friday, 10 August 2007 09:22 (eighteen years ago)

if you've already voted for yourself you can go home.

-- El Tomboto, Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:24 (Thursday, 9 August 2007 21:24)

u_u

I look at it as: you can't beat sex with someone you love...

kv_nol, Friday, 10 August 2007 09:54 (eighteen years ago)

I don't fuck!

But if I did, it's totally freaking obvious with a giant DDBDUH which ILX0r I want to have all the sex with.

Masonic Boom, Friday, 10 August 2007 10:45 (eighteen years ago)

I'm voting for Beth.

Ms Misery, Friday, 10 August 2007 13:25 (eighteen years ago)

Chaki's going to win anyway, he always has the hottest babes in his WDYLL thread pictures.

StanM, Friday, 10 August 2007 13:35 (eighteen years ago)

Just b/c he can pay them to take pictures with him doesn't mean he can afford to pay them to come online and vote.

Ms Misery, Friday, 10 August 2007 13:37 (eighteen years ago)

While I do adore Beth, my affections are not so prurient as they might be re: a couple of others. But I'm still not voting.

Laurel, Friday, 10 August 2007 13:37 (eighteen years ago)

I'm voting for Beth b/c I want to see the cheesecake rocky beach picture.

Ms Misery, Friday, 10 August 2007 13:38 (eighteen years ago)

the only person i would didn't make it onto this poll, so people need to start posting some ass.jpgs to help me make up my mind

bell_labs, Friday, 10 August 2007 13:41 (eighteen years ago)

please, please don't.

Ms Misery, Friday, 10 August 2007 13:44 (eighteen years ago)

hahaha attempt to do this with cameraphone have produced some pretty interesting results though, mostly because my house is a mess and I am wearing ridiculous underwear today

El Tomboto, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1230/1074016566_49db1bf66f_o.jpg

El Tomboto, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:21 (eighteen years ago)

HAIR PERSPECT

El Tomboto, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:21 (eighteen years ago)

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1198/1073182237_9c91be8dd1_o.jpg

El Tomboto, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)

you don't know your ass from your elbow

kenan, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)

COSMIC BUTTLAND

El Tomboto, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:24 (eighteen years ago)

wy is that underwear ridiculous it's black

more

Surmounter, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:24 (eighteen years ago)

:o

river wolf, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:25 (eighteen years ago)

tombot's limbless, floating torso: so hot

elmo argonaut, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:25 (eighteen years ago)

oh that's all you get. the other 20+ shots that were completely terrible stay in dev/null where they belong, for eternity. son.

El Tomboto, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:26 (eighteen years ago)

tease

Surmounter, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:26 (eighteen years ago)

this summer. . .TOMBOT is:

TROLLING FOR PERVS

Mr. Que, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:28 (eighteen years ago)

only because BORED AT HOME AFTER 4x10 SHIFT was unappealing to the target demographic

El Tomboto, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:30 (eighteen years ago)

Second pic's got kind of a Hans Bellmer vibe insofar as it's a part of the human body I could not identify worth fuck.

Abbott, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:33 (eighteen years ago)

kinda a aphex/cunningham thing you've got going on there

http://www.warprecords.com/media/img/rj.jpg

Rob Bolton, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)

that's not really necessary, is it?

kenan, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:36 (eighteen years ago)

on this thread, i think it is.

Rob Bolton, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:37 (eighteen years ago)

you aren't even in this poll

elmo argonaut, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:43 (eighteen years ago)

lets just keep posting so i don't have to look at that anymore?

Surmounter, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:45 (eighteen years ago)

good idea

elmo argonaut, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:46 (eighteen years ago)

boo!

Surmounter, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:46 (eighteen years ago)

surmounter show us ur butt

elmo argonaut, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:46 (eighteen years ago)

::gasp!::

Surmounter, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:48 (eighteen years ago)

cut it out, elmo

river wolf, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:49 (eighteen years ago)

hey

Mr. Que, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:49 (eighteen years ago)

that picture

Mr. Que, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:49 (eighteen years ago)

sucks

Mr. Que, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:50 (eighteen years ago)

tombot is wearing them newfangled "seamless" undies, y/n

elmo argonaut, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:50 (eighteen years ago)

yeah i don't have a problem with his underwear

Mr. Que, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:51 (eighteen years ago)

i love black underwear

Surmounter, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:52 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.topsynergy.com/images/famous/Bob_Dole_Main.jpg

Will M., Friday, 10 August 2007 18:52 (eighteen years ago)

"Bob Dole loves black underwear." -- Bob Dole

kenan, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:53 (eighteen years ago)

that's abe vigoda

Will M., Friday, 10 August 2007 18:53 (eighteen years ago)

man i am so hungry that that joke seemed funny as i was writing it. in retrospect, makes no sense

Will M., Friday, 10 August 2007 18:54 (eighteen years ago)

http://static.flickr.com/5/8571850_e9d4d2fcb9_o.jpg

kenan, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:55 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.abevigoda.com/ffb.php

kenan, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:56 (eighteen years ago)

"Boxers or briefs, Bob?"
"Depends."

Eazy, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:57 (eighteen years ago)

HEY-O

river wolf, Friday, 10 August 2007 18:59 (eighteen years ago)

I, for one, am really looking forward to the "SEPTEMBER 2007: WDYLL WITH A BRUISED EGO AND CRUSHED SENSE OF SELF ESTEEM?" thread.

John Justen, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:25 (eighteen years ago)

totally

Surmounter, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:26 (eighteen years ago)

If this thread directly leads to crushed self esteem, I will concede that heavy metal directly leads to suicide

kenan, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:27 (eighteen years ago)

...in the aftermath of LabXOR DAY 2K7?

xp JJ

river wolf, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:28 (eighteen years ago)

maybe he means "WDYLL WITH A BRUISED EGO AND CRUSHED SENSE OF SELF ESTEEM AFTER SLEEPING WITH AN ILXOR?"

kenan, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:30 (eighteen years ago)

kind of a guilty morning-after thread

kenan, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:30 (eighteen years ago)

who would u fuk for breakfast, and where?

bell_labs, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)

I like the multiple interpretations available for "and where" in that sentence.

John Justen, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:35 (eighteen years ago)

TS MPLS vs. IN TEH BUTT.

John Justen, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:36 (eighteen years ago)

if you had said "vs the asshole" i could've made a cutting st paul joke

ghost rider, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:37 (eighteen years ago)

do it anyway!

river wolf, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:37 (eighteen years ago)

i don't actually have one worked out, i'm bluffing ;_;

ghost rider, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:39 (eighteen years ago)

maybe you could try "yr wife"

El Tomboto, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:44 (eighteen years ago)

maybe we all could

kenan, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:46 (eighteen years ago)

wow this thread is like the state fair, only free

Mr. Que, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:50 (eighteen years ago)

who would u fuk for breakfast, and where?

-- bell_labs, Friday, August 10, 2007 8:32 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

I like the multiple interpretations available for "and where" in that sentence.

-- John Justen, Friday, August 10, 2007 8:35 PM (15 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

FUCK YOU IN THE PANCAKE

Mr. Que, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)

you are all crepes

latebloomer, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:52 (eighteen years ago)

the dudes i nominated on the 'sexiest guy on this board' best be remembering me before casting their vote here... (xpost, eg. latebloomer)

more campaigning for pity votes (although unrelated): 3 hours sleep and hungover; i'm about to head out for a 13-14 hour day at work. and apologies for my ruination, while drunk, of the WDYLL thread. don't hold it against me.

Rubyredd, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:52 (eighteen years ago)

no one will hold anything against you.

kenan, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)

I mean...

kenan, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)

what kenan's trying to say is, he has a special kind of hollandaise sauce to share with everyone

Mr. Que, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:55 (eighteen years ago)

the Mother Sauce!

kenan, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:56 (eighteen years ago)

http://lumiere.sopheava.com/2005/1026_crepe.jpg

gabbneb, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:56 (eighteen years ago)

that would normally look really delicious...

Surmounter, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)

you are all crepes

-- latebloomer, Friday, August 10, 2007 8:52 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

Surmounter, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)

http://cleanplateclubnyc.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/Nutella%20Banana%20Crepe.jpg

gabbneb, Friday, 10 August 2007 20:59 (eighteen years ago)

OH THE IRONING

river wolf, Friday, 10 August 2007 21:00 (eighteen years ago)

Results 1 - 3 of 3 for "erotic patisserie". (0.39 seconds)

Just got offed, Friday, 10 August 2007 21:01 (eighteen years ago)

the good news is, the crepes has finally pushed Taintface off the screen

kenan, Friday, 10 August 2007 21:01 (eighteen years ago)

fuck (fuk?), I want a crepe now

gabbneb, Friday, 10 August 2007 21:02 (eighteen years ago)

hahahaha someone finally got my super-obvious pancake joke!

latebloomer, Friday, 10 August 2007 21:19 (eighteen years ago)

I'm worries this will be like Valentine's Day in elementary school and someone will be sad about getting no valentine cards. Except instead of a little card with a picture of Shaggy surrounded by hearts saying, "Zoinks! Have a swell Valentine's!" the message is a misspelled expression of vulgarity and impersonal, awkward nudesweat.

-- Abbott

i will be measuring my entire self-worth by these poll results.

Rubyredd, Friday, 10 August 2007 23:40 (eighteen years ago)

ADMIN REQ: Can I change my vote?

StanM, Friday, 10 August 2007 23:43 (eighteen years ago)

just kidding :-)

StanM, Friday, 10 August 2007 23:44 (eighteen years ago)

it didn't immediately occur to me to vote for myself, and i ended up wasting my vote on some dude. i want to change my vote, too.

Rubyredd, Friday, 10 August 2007 23:47 (eighteen years ago)

I could mail you a Scooby Doo valentine card if you want, pity campaigner. You can have one with the Mystery Machine & crew on one of the Scoobs solo.

Abbott, Friday, 10 August 2007 23:48 (eighteen years ago)

do u really wanna fuck urself Ruby?

Surmounter, Friday, 10 August 2007 23:52 (eighteen years ago)

No one will know who MADE the VOTES,,,,,o secret.

Abbott, Friday, 10 August 2007 23:54 (eighteen years ago)

xpost to abbott - yes plz!

xpost to surmounter - beggars can't be choosers

OH POOR POOR ME DO YOU FEEL SORRY FOR ME YET

Rubyredd, Friday, 10 August 2007 23:59 (eighteen years ago)

The only hope for me not being the absolute last entry in the poll results is if Whiney G Weingarten also gets no votes.

ATTACK AD IN PRODUCTION

wanko ergo sum, Friday, 10 August 2007 23:59 (eighteen years ago)

dude, don't be competing with me for the sympathy votes. competition is already tough enough.

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:01 (eighteen years ago)

You have to admit it's rather dehumazizing for both the pity fuckee and the pity fucker to be part of a lukewarm piteous one night stand.

Abbott, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:02 (eighteen years ago)

wanko i voted for you out of sympathy. thank you hotmail account.

but you should post a pic so i know if i need to regret my decision.

Rubyred, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:04 (eighteen years ago)

ohmy she's hardcore

Surmounter, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:05 (eighteen years ago)

a lukewarm piteous one night stand

is there any other kind, really?

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:07 (eighteen years ago)

You won't regret it rubyred, I am v. v. cuet.

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:08 (eighteen years ago)

xpost

there's a worse kind: the lukewarm piteous internet one night stand

StanM, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:08 (eighteen years ago)

but that's no fun, now if you only get one vote it will still feel like zero

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:09 (eighteen years ago)

OH GET A BOARD YOU TWO

(xxpost)

StanM, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:09 (eighteen years ago)

the wanko/ruby board: the horniest place on the internet

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:12 (eighteen years ago)

http://static.flickr.com/143/322474833_3db6392e76_m.jpg

StanM, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:13 (eighteen years ago)

LOL exactly

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:13 (eighteen years ago)

a lot of competition, but we're game

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:14 (eighteen years ago)

get it

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:14 (eighteen years ago)

WANKO I WANT PROOF OF YOUR CUETNESS

xxxxxxxpost kenan OTFM re: piteous one nite stands

wanko's vote might be a pity vote (until further notice) but it was HEARTFELT

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:17 (eighteen years ago)

I Love Dating

make it happen. nominate Confounded, Jergins and Lingbert as mods.

Just got offed, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:17 (eighteen years ago)

actually wanko and jergins might be the horniest place on the internet, sorry ruby!!

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:19 (eighteen years ago)

WHAT

bummerz

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:21 (eighteen years ago)

what does this fellow 'jergins' have that i don't???

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:21 (eighteen years ago)

http://img.classiccloseouts.com/images_104/attributes_m/5DZ133385.jpg
nevermind different spelling

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:22 (eighteen years ago)

xxpost

a little Rubbing would be going on in there too, I bet, so if you could maybe incorporate that into your username (rubuntilitsredd or rubbingredd?)

StanM, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:23 (eighteen years ago)

ew. No don't.

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:24 (eighteen years ago)

LLOLL

W4LTER, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:24 (eighteen years ago)

woah, what the hell is going on?

ENBB, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:25 (eighteen years ago)

cherry almond sounds gross. i smell like green tea and lime.

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:26 (eighteen years ago)

green tea and patchouli over here... don't be scared by the patchouli. The green tea totally redeems it.

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:28 (eighteen years ago)

this thread is about 60 posts away from meta-collapse, i'll forecast that now, sit back, and watch the inevitabilities unfold

Just got offed, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:28 (eighteen years ago)

ENBB: various kinds of nuendo are going on at the moment: in & out.

StanM, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:28 (eighteen years ago)

hey, why is there no ", but in women's clothes" option? :-(

StanM, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:29 (eighteen years ago)

'innuendo' is giving us way too much credit

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:30 (eighteen years ago)

xpost: u can vote for me all u like, but i'm not putting out, sweetie

Just got offed, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:30 (eighteen years ago)

this thread is the only thing keeping me upright at my job.
i am dying on the inside.

you guys are my inspiration, my will to live.

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:31 (eighteen years ago)

only 20 days to go!

StanM, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:32 (eighteen years ago)

i don't know if i can stand the anticipation

WANKO WHERE'S YR PHOTO

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:34 (eighteen years ago)

i am dying on the inside.

you're even going for the necrophiliac vote? OMG you're serious about this.

StanM, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:34 (eighteen years ago)

fuck yeah

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:34 (eighteen years ago)

I did a GIS for wanko (it's surprisingly safe for work) and this is him:

http://10e.org/samcimg/wanko2.jpg

StanM, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:37 (eighteen years ago)

v v v cuet

sadly, totally un-fuk-able

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:38 (eighteen years ago)

hey, why is there no ", but in women's clothes" option? :-(

Because no one would select that option? Which is why I've been wearing my boyfriend's shirts and gave myself a Bruce McCulloch haircut (the former is only true because we have been unable to do laundry for 4 weeks and will have to wait 3 more weeks to do it)(the haircut is because my haircut is awesome).

Abbott, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:42 (eighteen years ago)

Abbott - I want pictures of you with said haircut.

ENBB, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:46 (eighteen years ago)

ARGH RUBY I SHOULDA VOTED FOR YOU

Surmounter, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:48 (eighteen years ago)

Oh IT'S A-COMING, once I get this installed (this CS2 suite in a bit here), the Brucio hair will be WITNESSED.

Abbott, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:48 (eighteen years ago)

!!!

Surmounter, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:48 (eighteen years ago)

Abbott - awesome.

Surmounter - who did you vote for?

ENBB, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:49 (eighteen years ago)

i think tho, that you need to post a pic on this thread, Ruby

what ? i can't tell you tht!

Surmounter, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:50 (eighteen years ago)

::awestruck::

Surmounter, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:50 (eighteen years ago)

i want to post my sluttiest-ever photo but might be going a little far. sur, i'm disappointed you didn't vote for me - what if no one else does????

tell me who you voted for so i can kick their ass

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:54 (eighteen years ago)

short hair with a side part? that's how i remember him. or you could mean this

http://www.geocities.com/kids_inthehall/brucehunk.jpg

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:54 (eighteen years ago)

i'll vote for you, ruby

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:55 (eighteen years ago)

That picture is all kinds of awesome.

ENBB, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:55 (eighteen years ago)

srsly. Wolfman McCullough.

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:57 (eighteen years ago)

what does this fellow 'jergins' have that i don't???

-- Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:21 (18 minutes ago) Link

so so much, girl. you don't even know.

jergïns, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:57 (eighteen years ago)

LADIES OF ILX

vote for me. i'll make it worth your while

(dudes need not apply)

jergïns, Saturday, 11 August 2007 00:58 (eighteen years ago)

enlighten me

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:01 (eighteen years ago)

if chaki wins he gets a trip to mexico
if i win i get a trip straight to your heart

jergïns, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:02 (eighteen years ago)

Smoove. Very Smoove.

ENBB, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:03 (eighteen years ago)

i am a modest man by nature, but i think this sums up my style, what you might "expect":

i just washed down 1/3 of a xanax with some salt water nasal spray

-- jergïns, Friday, July 13, 2007 8:50 PM (4 weeks ago) Bookmark Link

jergïns, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:03 (eighteen years ago)

that's got to give you some kind of indication of how i play

jergïns, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:03 (eighteen years ago)

shot through the heart
and you're to blame
you give fuk
a bad name

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:04 (eighteen years ago)

OH MY GOD U R MY DREAM MAN JERGINS

WAIT - ARE YOU BALD? I HEART BALD MEN!

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:05 (eighteen years ago)

it's a shame you've already voted. get another account, vote, then IM me, girl

jergïns, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:06 (eighteen years ago)

jergins ftw???!!!1!?

I mean I didn't vote for him though..

W4LTER, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:06 (eighteen years ago)

I haven't voted yet but that might change very soon.

ENBB, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:07 (eighteen years ago)

(thanks 4 vote, wanko)

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:08 (eighteen years ago)

crazy. the lot of you.

Surmounter, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:10 (eighteen years ago)

i feel like it's prom court!

Surmounter, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:11 (eighteen years ago)

Wait - do most HS still have that sort of thing? I went to a girl's catholic school so we didn't have anything of the sort and I didn't realize it was still done!

ENBB, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:12 (eighteen years ago)

dude, it's done.

Surmounter, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:13 (eighteen years ago)

i thought catholic schools had proms?

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:14 (eighteen years ago)

oh we had a prom just without the king/queen thing. I guess at an all girls' school the king part would have been tough to manage.

ENBB, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:16 (eighteen years ago)

um yeah tori amos was her homecoming queen? and she was really catholic?

Surmounter, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:16 (eighteen years ago)

fellas, if you're interested in voting for me, i will accept your vote. it is conditional, though. check out the forums at cosplay.com, pm me with your choice of (female) costume, and we'll go from there.

jergïns, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:16 (eighteen years ago)

trying to open new account with my student email but it's taking too long to get password. IT'S ALL FOR YOU, JERGINS.

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:21 (eighteen years ago)

ALL FOR YOU by JANET. 'nite

Surmounter, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:21 (eighteen years ago)

http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b361/tapestore/milkstache.jpg

I'm currently deciding between four prom candidates. One is my childhood best friend. Another is a large 20-year-old man. There's also this awesome twentysomething girl. Oh, and one is an American Idol.

Choices.

Tape Store, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:22 (eighteen years ago)

HI JERGINS *WINK WINK*

VOTE RUBYREDD FOR MOST FUK-ABLE. I AM DESPERADO #1, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:26 (eighteen years ago)

you're good

jergïns, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:31 (eighteen years ago)

i like your style

jergïns, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:32 (eighteen years ago)

oh now that's just shameless ;)

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:32 (eighteen years ago)

BOTH OF YOU

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:32 (eighteen years ago)

I wake up to this. Oy.

Trayce, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:36 (eighteen years ago)

xpost i am beyond shame. i knew all those unused email accounts would come in handy one day. kenan i would have spared a vote for you cuz you look a little like my sexy ex-casual fling (on the right):
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1144/1077242606_ebd1abc6e3.jpg
but i ran out of email accounts

[although i thinks it's really just the glasses]

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:41 (eighteen years ago)

uhh. Thanks?

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:50 (eighteen years ago)

I mean, he's a fine-looking fellow and all.

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:50 (eighteen years ago)

ruby A/S/L

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:55 (eighteen years ago)

dude, i'm not good with all this internet-speak. elaborate.

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 01:59 (eighteen years ago)

American Sign Language

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 02:00 (eighteen years ago)

kenan, that dude is a babe (imo). but a bit of a dick. he's the doppelganger i sent you a link to ages ago, then retracted the comparison. those specs really get me.

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 02:01 (eighteen years ago)

Hey, I'm a bit of a dick, too! We would get along famously, I'm sure.

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 02:06 (eighteen years ago)

he has pretty eyes, ferreal

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 02:07 (eighteen years ago)

feral

Rock Hardy, Saturday, 11 August 2007 02:11 (eighteen years ago)

he didn't look so good when he took his glasses off. i wanted to ask him to leave them on when we uh... but i thought it might weird him out.

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 02:19 (eighteen years ago)

i <3 you, abbott. i can't wait for my valentine!! i hope it doesn't get lost in the mail while it's making it's way round the other side of the world!!

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 02:31 (eighteen years ago)

I always leave my glasses on... uh... during. And the lights on. I'm visually stimulated, what can I say.

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 02:33 (eighteen years ago)

Eating pussy with glasses on is a big no-go.

Rock Hardy, Saturday, 11 August 2007 02:37 (eighteen years ago)

?

I don't know how you do it, but my glasses are well above the waterline.

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 02:42 (eighteen years ago)

i just choked on my laughter at a very inappropriate moment

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 02:44 (eighteen years ago)

Well I'm Eazy E the one they're talkin about
Nigga tried to roll the dice and just crapped out
Police tried to roll, so it's time to go
I creeped away real slow and jumped in the six-fo'
Wit the "Diamond in the back, sun-roof top"
Diggin the scene with the gangsta lean
Cause I'm the E, I don't slang or bang
I just smoke motherfuckers like it ain't no thang
And all you bitches, you know I'm talkin to you
"We want to fuck you Eazy!" I want to fuck you too

Eazy, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:16 (eighteen years ago)

I'm visually stimulated, what can I say.

you say this but then i always remember something you said about not liking women in mags holding themselves open. kind of missing the point.

this thread somehow always scans 'who have u fuked' which is just wrong.

Ms Misery, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:34 (eighteen years ago)

LOLOL @ eazy

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:36 (eighteen years ago)

you say this but then i always remember something you said about not liking women in mags holding themselves open. kind of missing the point.

waht, no. Because I'm visual doesn't mean I need gynecological detail. That's not just visual, it's a bit much. When I'm doing that porn surfing thing, there are these little galleries of a girl, and often one or two pics are just a giant close up of one or other body part. NO! I click away quick. I need face, body, something... some context! Just because I'm male doesn't mean I love to stare at flaps of hairy roast beef all day. Have a person attached, plz.

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:43 (eighteen years ago)

speak for yourself.

Ms Misery, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:45 (eighteen years ago)

kenan=sensitivenewageguy ;p

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:46 (eighteen years ago)

Need to have a face and an occupation and a likes-and-dislikes attached.

Eazy, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:48 (eighteen years ago)

oh fuck all of you

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:49 (eighteen years ago)

No, no, no, I hear what you're saying.

Eazy, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:50 (eighteen years ago)

xpost you can only do that if you create a whole heap of email accounts ;)

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:51 (eighteen years ago)

take WallOfVadge.jpg, for instance... if you think guys are so singularly visual, why do we think that's fantastically gross?

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:51 (eighteen years ago)

pussies are nice. .

omg I just sounded like kenan. please kill me.

Ms Misery, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:51 (eighteen years ago)

fantastically gross... yet strangely compelling

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:53 (eighteen years ago)

the vadges in wallofvadge seem to be chosen fore their cumminess which is sort of gross

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:54 (eighteen years ago)

for

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:55 (eighteen years ago)

xpost more like compellingly strange

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:55 (eighteen years ago)

the vadges in wallofvadge seem to be chosen fore their cumminess which is sort of gross

I tried to say this before, kind of, but ally screamed at me. You don't need semen to have a vagina that has a bit of cloudy discharge.

Oh, god. "Discharge" sounds so gross. What's a better word for it?

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:57 (eighteen years ago)

I tried "runoff" but that makes it sound like environmentally unfriendly farmland or something.

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 03:58 (eighteen years ago)

"Vaginal mucous" is accurate, but still does not have the ring of love for the vagina and its fluids that I would like to convey.

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:03 (eighteen years ago)

Jeez... no wonder they call me creepy. I'm not kidding, though!

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:04 (eighteen years ago)

quim gimlet

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:04 (eighteen years ago)

Jesus, this thread sinks ever lower. Wallovadge discussions should really be relegated to its one thread w/the direly accurate title. If you want to talk about the runoff, mail a poem to the editors of "Our Bodies Our Selves."

Abbott, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:07 (eighteen years ago)

Luvjuice

Eazy, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:08 (eighteen years ago)

alls i'm saying is that there's more than one dude I have heard from who thinks that the fluid visible on the wallofvadge could only originate from a penis. I don't want dudes to go around thinking this. It's a public service, do you see?

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:11 (eighteen years ago)

also probably a bit of a subconscious alpha-male challenge that i know pussies better than you, and that's creepy, and I will say nothing more about it.

Sorry.

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:17 (eighteen years ago)

OUR BODIES OUR SELVES GETS IN TOUCH WITH INNER GODDESS MADE OF CHOCOLATE

http://www.sugart.org/images/sculptures/ribbondancer.jpg

Abbott, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:18 (eighteen years ago)

http://chocolate.zooloot.com/images/chocolate-bar2.jpg

Abbott, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:20 (eighteen years ago)

when I said cumminess I meant 'run-off' or whatever.

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:21 (eighteen years ago)

beaver jam

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:21 (eighteen years ago)

i <3 this thread!

aww kenan you're ok dude.

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:22 (eighteen years ago)

where's that 'semen euphemisms' thread? i'm sure some of those could apply here.

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:22 (eighteen years ago)

xxpost i fear that if I say one more word on this subject, I will become the most unfuckable man of all time.

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:23 (eighteen years ago)

yeah but you got a woman so it doesn't matter. feel sorry for us single desperados.

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:24 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, there is one girl who can be relied on to not find me creepy, and that's all that matters. :)

You are not a desperado. You're a pretty girl. Go out tonight! It's Saturday!

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:28 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.freshchocodiles.com/images/chocolate_cupcake_close_in.jpg

Abbott, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:28 (eighteen years ago)

Abbott otm

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:31 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.snoozebuttondreams.com/images/DodgeVagina.jpg

Abbott, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:31 (eighteen years ago)

Why would someone want to pour milk (of Elmer's Glue viscosity) all over milk chocolate?

Abbott, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:32 (eighteen years ago)

abbott that is gross.

xpost to kenan: i'm here at the store all day, then i get to go to my waitressing job straight after. actually, tbh, there i'm not suffering a shortage of 'offers', as such - more a shortage of offers i want to take up.

and i did go out last night! and then i came home drunk and posted stupid smart-ass comments on wdyll and became a retard.

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:32 (eighteen years ago)

welcome to the fold

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:33 (eighteen years ago)

are you the one who works at Ann Taylor or somesuch retail?

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:34 (eighteen years ago)

*i feel like i've finally found a place to call home*

i work at ecco.

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:34 (eighteen years ago)

it's 11:30 friday night here, and i am not drunk, but I am starting to wish I was

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:35 (eighteen years ago)

wanko where's my photo?

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:35 (eighteen years ago)

abbott that is gross.

abbott that is genius.

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:36 (eighteen years ago)

I just tried but the camera is out of batteries. I will look for some.

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:41 (eighteen years ago)

wanko, all this anticipation - you better be a goddamn SEX GOD

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:43 (eighteen years ago)

I am. On most Friday nights I am having sex with hot babes. Just not this Friday night, which is a rare exception.

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:48 (eighteen years ago)

I don't know that your screen name supports that assertion.

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:50 (eighteen years ago)

xpost i wouldn't expect anything less. you know i like meaty/chubby bald guys with chicago accents, right? i hope you meet all these requirements.

Rubyredd, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:50 (eighteen years ago)

i think i got burned the worst with the static screen name law.

wanko ergo sum, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:51 (eighteen years ago)

i think i like this screen v much

surely i should get, like, bonus votes for being so hardcore? and what happened to beth?

VOTE RUBYREDD FOR MOST FUK-ABLE. I AM DESPERADO #1, Saturday, 11 August 2007 04:56 (eighteen years ago)

and watch the inevitabilities unfold

El Tomboto, Saturday, 11 August 2007 06:23 (eighteen years ago)

geez.

this thread is long now.

Surmounter, Saturday, 11 August 2007 14:23 (eighteen years ago)

meanwhile ILM is pretty calm. i see lampposts over there, whereas over here it's like a college campus the morning after the big dance. most of u are still asleep and of course i'm the guy on my way to the cafeteria to eat like a bucket of fries.

=P

Surmounter, Saturday, 11 August 2007 14:26 (eighteen years ago)

How does a bucket of fries eat?

Rock Hardy, Saturday, 11 August 2007 14:28 (eighteen years ago)

MOM

Surmounter, Saturday, 11 August 2007 14:29 (eighteen years ago)

haha

kenan, Saturday, 11 August 2007 14:34 (eighteen years ago)

So, campaigning is over already?

StanM, Monday, 13 August 2007 07:22 (eighteen years ago)

people be Campaigning?

Mark G, Monday, 13 August 2007 08:05 (eighteen years ago)

*puts hand over his "Fuk Rubyredd!" badge*

What do you mean?

StanM, Monday, 13 August 2007 08:21 (eighteen years ago)

STILL CAMPAIGNING

VOTE RUBYREDD FOR MOST FUK-ABLE. I AM DESPERADO #1, Monday, 13 August 2007 12:08 (eighteen years ago)

I'd wanna see more revealing pics of the chix0rs before voting

Heave Ho, Monday, 13 August 2007 13:17 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, but then we'd be labelled vain and slutty.

Rubyredd, Monday, 13 August 2007 13:52 (eighteen years ago)

too late

kenan, Monday, 13 August 2007 14:08 (eighteen years ago)

low blow, dude.

Rubyredd, Monday, 13 August 2007 14:12 (eighteen years ago)

think he was blowing himself?

blueski, Monday, 13 August 2007 14:13 (eighteen years ago)

just to clarify, I'm more in the "vain and slutty" camp than you'll ever be. People here have seen me naked, for no damn good reason.

kenan, Monday, 13 August 2007 14:14 (eighteen years ago)

vain, slutty, AND defensive

elmo argonaut, Monday, 13 August 2007 14:16 (eighteen years ago)

attractive, no?

kenan, Monday, 13 August 2007 14:18 (eighteen years ago)

T/S INTERROGATIVE VS. DECLARATIVE.

John Justen, Monday, 13 August 2007 14:24 (eighteen years ago)

if any of you strange people i only know through the internet want to jump my bones, please be advised that that's a little creepy but i'd still appreciate your vote all the same :)

elmo argonaut, Monday, 13 August 2007 14:46 (eighteen years ago)

well put, and exactly the reason I'll be thrilled to get zero votes on this gross poll.

kenan, Monday, 13 August 2007 14:47 (eighteen years ago)

I WANT ALL YOUR VOTES AND I WILL NOT BE CREEPED OUT OR GROSSED OUT IF I GET THEM.

VOTE RUBYREDD FOR MOST FUK-ABLE. I AM DESPERADO #1, Monday, 13 August 2007 14:50 (eighteen years ago)

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1256/1096122356_44bcfe978d.jpg

I better get some mufuggin votes, yo.

Jesse, Monday, 13 August 2007 17:07 (eighteen years ago)

no fear jesse, keep it up

Surmounter, Monday, 13 August 2007 17:08 (eighteen years ago)

I am posting that pic every fucking where because I am the proud new owner of a 4-pack.

Jesse, Monday, 13 August 2007 17:09 (eighteen years ago)

Prediction: if this keeps up, I am going to be vain in <1 month.

Jesse, Monday, 13 August 2007 17:10 (eighteen years ago)

you are beautiful, be all the vain you want

kenan, Monday, 13 August 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)

I promise tantric action.

Dr Morbius, Monday, 13 August 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)

I want to grab those rapidly diminishing luv handles and eat yr butt.

-- kenan, Monday, August 13, 2007 10:21 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link

Jesse, Monday, 13 August 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)

gay ass-eating kills thread

:(

kenan, Monday, 13 August 2007 18:45 (eighteen years ago)

STOP TRYING TO STEAL MY VOTES WITH YA 4-PACK ELMO.

VOTE RUBYREDD FOR MOST FUK-ABLE. I AM DESPERADO #1, Monday, 13 August 2007 18:49 (eighteen years ago)

do you ever sleep?

kenan, Monday, 13 August 2007 18:53 (eighteen years ago)

maybe she will, with you, if you vote for her!

StanM, Monday, 13 August 2007 18:55 (eighteen years ago)

not often. there's too much campaigning to do.

it's 7am here.

xpost

Rubyredd, Monday, 13 August 2007 18:56 (eighteen years ago)

that is not elmo

river wolf, Monday, 13 August 2007 18:56 (eighteen years ago)

stanM, the question is 'who would you fuk?', not 'who would I fuk?'

xpost apologies; i'm sleep deprived and easily confused

Rubyredd, Monday, 13 August 2007 18:58 (eighteen years ago)

STOP TRYING TO STEAL MY VOTES WITH YA 4-PACK ELMO JESSE

Rubyredd, Monday, 13 August 2007 18:59 (eighteen years ago)

SEND ME SEXIUAL PICTURE

Hurting 2, Monday, 13 August 2007 19:18 (eighteen years ago)

VOTE 4 ME !!!
I AM BEST CANDIADTE 4 FANTASTCAL ILX FUK !!!
YAY!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 14 August 2007 18:39 (eighteen years ago)

it's true. Look:

http://img01.picoodle.com/img/img01/8/5/24/f_streakingm_d641ea5.jpg

kenan, Tuesday, 14 August 2007 18:46 (eighteen years ago)

SEXY!!!

jhøshea, Tuesday, 14 August 2007 18:48 (eighteen years ago)

SNORGMAN

Abbott, Tuesday, 14 August 2007 18:49 (eighteen years ago)

I voted for Surmounter. I'm just going to come out with it. It's done, and it can't be undone. I have a lot of regret about that though Jhoshea is looking particularly passionate these days.

If I'm going to have sex with anyone, however, it would be predicated on Hoos schedule - I need him around to 'make it rain' on us during the festivities. That can be interpreted in many ways and I am open to any and all of them.

humansuit, Tuesday, 14 August 2007 19:45 (eighteen years ago)

I am never an option in these polls, clearly because I would win.

Ed, Tuesday, 14 August 2007 19:46 (eighteen years ago)

Doubtless.

I, personally, couldn't possibly pick just one.

Matt, Tuesday, 14 August 2007 20:00 (eighteen years ago)

I do with there was option for checkboxes instead of just radio buttons

kenan, Tuesday, 14 August 2007 20:02 (eighteen years ago)

I have yet to vote. Tough decision, really.

ENBB, Tuesday, 14 August 2007 20:04 (eighteen years ago)

This poll is taking waaaaayyy too long.

Masonic Boom, Wednesday, 15 August 2007 12:45 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah whats with the long end date I WANT ANSWERS.

Trayce, Wednesday, 15 August 2007 12:49 (eighteen years ago)

ME TOO

if i don't place in the top 10 i will never leave the house again.

Rubyredd, Wednesday, 15 August 2007 12:51 (eighteen years ago)

I'll wear Ray-Ban's and play sax with Arsenio to woo your votes!

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Wednesday, 15 August 2007 12:57 (eighteen years ago)

another two weeks, and we'll know!

And of course by then the thread will have long ago dropped off the new answers page and nobody will care.

kenan, Wednesday, 15 August 2007 14:11 (eighteen years ago)

There should have been a male thread and a female thread. But then again, the female thread would have been waaaaay creepy. Cause I bet all the creepy lurkers will throw off the votes for any meng.

Masonic Boom, Wednesday, 15 August 2007 14:12 (eighteen years ago)

if i don't place in the top 10 i will never leave the house again.

See, you're going about this all wrong. You can't seen needy, you know? You have to be aloof. "Whatever, vote for me or don't. I don't need you people."

And then post pictures of your boobs.

kenan, Wednesday, 15 August 2007 14:20 (eighteen years ago)

why not just do a 'who's the creepiest' poll

blueski, Wednesday, 15 August 2007 14:22 (eighteen years ago)

Ooh that would be a toughie.

n/a, Wednesday, 15 August 2007 14:22 (eighteen years ago)

the top 5 or ten are all locked up, i'm afraid

kenan, Wednesday, 15 August 2007 14:23 (eighteen years ago)

such a good idea, make it so

xpost

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Wednesday, 15 August 2007 14:23 (eighteen years ago)

maybe it was done on NB already?

blueski, Wednesday, 15 August 2007 14:43 (eighteen years ago)

boring :-(

StanM, Monday, 20 August 2007 06:05 (eighteen years ago)

Anyone got an over/under?

Eazy, Monday, 20 August 2007 06:11 (eighteen years ago)

:|

W4LTER, Monday, 20 August 2007 06:32 (eighteen years ago)

BIG HOOS HOLLA ;]

luriqua, Monday, 20 August 2007 07:03 (eighteen years ago)

eazy i will over but not under for 1 (one) vote

jergïns, Monday, 20 August 2007 07:16 (eighteen years ago)

There's a couple people I'd consider voting for, but they're not on the list.

jaymc, Monday, 20 August 2007 15:54 (eighteen years ago)

VOTE FOR ME BECAUSE MY ADVANCED AGE=SEXUUUUUAL EXXXPERIENCE!!!!!!

Beth Parker, Monday, 20 August 2007 16:11 (eighteen years ago)

Oh god, no response. I'm going away now, to bury my shame in backbreaking physical labor.

Beth Parker, Monday, 20 August 2007 16:23 (eighteen years ago)

WHICH WILL MAKE ME EVEN MORE ALLURING, ALL DIRTY AND TICK-INFESTED!!!!!!!

Beth Parker, Monday, 20 August 2007 16:23 (eighteen years ago)

It should be pointed out that a single vote really answers WHO WOULD U FUK FIRST?

Dr Morbius, Monday, 20 August 2007 21:24 (eighteen years ago)

i do not even remember who i voted for in this and furthermore don't particularly want to know who i voted for.

Will M., Monday, 20 August 2007 21:27 (eighteen years ago)

This is why it is illegal to vote drunk on Election Day.

Eazy, Monday, 20 August 2007 21:28 (eighteen years ago)

who would u fuk?

jhøshea, Monday, 20 August 2007 21:29 (eighteen years ago)

I'm not casting my vote until the eve of election day. I want to see what the candidates have to offer.

Beth Parker, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 02:04 (eighteen years ago)

latebloomer for prez

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 02:15 (eighteen years ago)

:D

latebloomer, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 02:35 (eighteen years ago)

roxy for Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Badassery

latebloomer, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 02:36 (eighteen years ago)

now we need a "platform"

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 02:37 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.hiller.org/files/i/platform-4-626.jpg

latebloomer, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 02:49 (eighteen years ago)

our platform kicks ass

latebloomer, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 02:49 (eighteen years ago)

"cold frostbitten death from above"

latebloomer, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 02:50 (eighteen years ago)

OF COURSE

roxymuzak, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 02:51 (eighteen years ago)

rubyredd </crepey drunk>

t0dd swiss, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 03:53 (eighteen years ago)

The Humansuit platform:

1. I have not made a woman barren with Syphilis since 1990. I didn't know better - I was legally a child.
2. I did not inhale.
3. I blew.
4. Condoms are a scourge to the environment.
5. Bestiality is something one should never discuss in Federal Court.
6. You have no moral culpability if you are blindfolded.

Will this get me a single vote?

humansuit, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 05:13 (eighteen years ago)

(b^_^)b

W4LTER, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 05:17 (eighteen years ago)

rubyredd </crepey drunk>

come on man. The girl who's BEGGING for it is not the one you want, especially in this case, since she's not really serious. Besides, she's in New Zealand, so what does it matter?

You know all this!

kenan, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 05:32 (eighteen years ago)

Todd Swiss and Abbott should get the hook up. There's a match.

:)

kenan, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 05:35 (eighteen years ago)

Workin' on the night mooooves

kingfish, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 05:38 (eighteen years ago)

excuse me kenan??? OF COURSE i'm the one he wants! stop trying to fuck up my chances of winning.

actually, he thought he was calling *me* a crepey drunk.

Rubyredd, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 07:44 (eighteen years ago)

i'm so going to top this chart.

ken c, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 09:14 (eighteen years ago)

and then post pictures of your boobs

go on, for ken....

Uptoeleven, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 10:26 (eighteen years ago)

i sent them to him privately. along with every other male ilxor, of course. didn't you get my email?

Rubyredd, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 11:06 (eighteen years ago)

On the one hand, I am human and I want to be fucked.... On the other, if I get a(ny) vote(s) I will only wonder where they came from and why since most people I know on ILX are Chilxors who I would not want to have wanting to fuck me.

Jesse, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 11:47 (eighteen years ago)

Children?

Tuomas, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 11:49 (eighteen years ago)

I'm happy with whatever I can get

ken c, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 11:53 (eighteen years ago)

oh fuck, xpost

ken c, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 11:53 (eighteen years ago)

I am human and I want to be fucked

just like everybody else does?

kenan, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 12:46 (eighteen years ago)

Uh, there do exist people who are asexual.

Anyway can't wait till this poll closes. That said, if I even get one vote for me, I'm gonna be so freaked out.

nathalie, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 12:48 (eighteen years ago)

duh

xpost

ken c, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 12:48 (eighteen years ago)

Please please please let everyone get the number of votes they want.

StanM, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 12:50 (eighteen years ago)

Subzero then?

nathalie, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 12:51 (eighteen years ago)

People just don't know about The Smiths anymore, kenan & jesse :-(

StanM, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 13:04 (eighteen years ago)

it's TATU, silly.

ken c, Tuesday, 21 August 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6688353.stm

Heave Ho, Wednesday, 22 August 2007 08:52 (eighteen years ago)

Um, so, yeah. Depressingly inactive thread, isn't it? :-/

StanM, Thursday, 30 August 2007 06:02 (eighteen years ago)

i finally voted (thanks stanm that was hot)

jergïns, Thursday, 30 August 2007 06:10 (eighteen years ago)

I voted for this lovely young lady http://i16.tinypic.com/4kku1si.jpg (so dontcha be thinking she voted for herself)

Abbie wins this one though, i'd be willing to bet (1) dollar on it (were i a betting person).

Heave Ho, Thursday, 30 August 2007 07:24 (eighteen years ago)

Abbie? You mean Gabbynebbie?

StanM, Thursday, 30 August 2007 07:42 (eighteen years ago)

"Abbot"

Heave Ho, Thursday, 30 August 2007 07:52 (eighteen years ago)

Oh.

StanM, Thursday, 30 August 2007 07:54 (eighteen years ago)

Still not in the top 100 you guys!

Mark C, Thursday, 30 August 2007 09:24 (eighteen years ago)

I'm pretty sure that I've already won this, all thanks to my massive penis.

King Boy Pato, Thursday, 30 August 2007 09:33 (eighteen years ago)

so if you don't win, it means your penis is tiny

ken c, Thursday, 30 August 2007 10:37 (eighteen years ago)

most anti-climactic poll ever

blueski, Thursday, 30 August 2007 10:40 (eighteen years ago)

There hasn't been the climax yet!

(has there, anybody?)

Mark G, Thursday, 30 August 2007 10:42 (eighteen years ago)

blueski's ejaculation there was immature

ken c, Thursday, 30 August 2007 10:46 (eighteen years ago)

premature

ken c, Thursday, 30 August 2007 10:47 (eighteen years ago)

and immature

ken c, Thursday, 30 August 2007 10:47 (eighteen years ago)

http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/453/neddy4.jpg

Frogman Henry, Thursday, 30 August 2007 10:54 (eighteen years ago)

that should sort the votes out

Frogman Henry, Thursday, 30 August 2007 10:56 (eighteen years ago)

thanks for that, frogman

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 30 August 2007 11:01 (eighteen years ago)

can you email me the original jpeg sans ned?

ken c, Thursday, 30 August 2007 11:38 (eighteen years ago)

the....what? you've lost me.

Frogman Henry, Thursday, 30 August 2007 11:46 (eighteen years ago)

underneath ned's face was tuomas's face

blueski, Thursday, 30 August 2007 11:51 (eighteen years ago)

unclean, holmes, unclean

King Boy Pato, Thursday, 30 August 2007 11:54 (eighteen years ago)

I want to do Mitt Romney but he's not in the pole.

humansuit, Thursday, 30 August 2007 14:31 (eighteen years ago)

My platform is this: I am married, but I would still string you along with false promises of one day running off together.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 30 August 2007 14:36 (eighteen years ago)

Oh how I envy all those straight women who can vote for you... :-/

StanM, Thursday, 30 August 2007 15:51 (eighteen years ago)

I'm surprised that Dom is the only one honest enough to put in for a roll in the hay with that cherubic beauty of a man, Geir Hongro.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Thursday, 30 August 2007 16:49 (eighteen years ago)

Automatic thread bump. This poll is closing tomorrow.

ILX System, Thursday, 30 August 2007 23:01 (eighteen years ago)

i would just like to officially state that i'm no longer depressed about not winning this poll, so all of those who carelessly voted for someone other than me: don't fret, dears, i forgive you all.

my fuk-needs are soon to be met IRL. FINALLY.

Rubyredd, Friday, 31 August 2007 02:31 (eighteen years ago)

uh.... ok

chaki, Friday, 31 August 2007 02:37 (eighteen years ago)

yay rubyredd! are they letting you into california finally, or the other way around?

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 02:41 (eighteen years ago)

tmi

Heave Ho, Friday, 31 August 2007 02:41 (eighteen years ago)

kenan: no... not quite... but something pretty goddamn awesome happened this week. i'll email you about it sometime soon.

Rubyredd, Friday, 31 August 2007 02:46 (eighteen years ago)

xpost Don't worry, guys, she's not going to make you watch or anything. Jeez.

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 02:47 (eighteen years ago)

She isn't? :-(

StanM, Friday, 31 August 2007 06:07 (eighteen years ago)

poppage pt. 2

Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 31 August 2007 06:39 (eighteen years ago)

Am I'm the creepy one.

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 06:59 (eighteen years ago)

Yes, you and.

StanM, Friday, 31 August 2007 07:06 (eighteen years ago)

Nevermind, a'm just kidding :=)

StanM, Friday, 31 August 2007 07:07 (eighteen years ago)

so did i win this thing yet or what.

gr8080, Friday, 31 August 2007 07:08 (eighteen years ago)

i fuked you already. you were asleep.

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 07:19 (eighteen years ago)

I has a jar of vaseline, a bottle of sedatives, and a tiny dick.

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 07:20 (eighteen years ago)

Hairy Asshurts to thread

StanM, Friday, 31 August 2007 07:23 (eighteen years ago)

Oh no, I didn't kill the thread, did I? Sorry :-(

StanM, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:51 (eighteen years ago)

My platform is this: I am married, but I would still string you along with false promises of one day running off together.

-- Hurting 2, Thursday, 30 August 2007 14:36 (Yesterday) Link

Oh how I envy all those straight women who can vote for you... :-/

-- StanM, Thursday, 30 August 2007 15:51 (Yesterday) Link

No, I'll string anyone along in exchange for votes - male or female.

Hurting 2, Friday, 31 August 2007 12:56 (eighteen years ago)

OMG today's the last day OMG

Jesse, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:39 (eighteen years ago)

this poll is meaningless. Today, EVERYBODY gets fuked!

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:40 (eighteen years ago)

September morn
We danced until the night became a brand new day
Two lovers playing scenes from some romantic play
September morning still can make me feel this way

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:41 (eighteen years ago)

I'm not voting, actually. Too crepey.

Beth Parker, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:42 (eighteen years ago)

ilx system in a landslide obv

sleep, Friday, 31 August 2007 14:44 (eighteen years ago)

landslide of fuk

Mark G, Friday, 31 August 2007 15:11 (eighteen years ago)

I like the ILX system bump, it's lovely lady bump, or maybe it's a chap, a chap with a lovely bump, a lovely chumpy bump

Maria :D, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:27 (eighteen years ago)

Crepes are yum.

Maria :D, Friday, 31 August 2007 16:27 (eighteen years ago)

Dude they are the best w/Nutella, fried bananas & almond slivers. Try it and be prepared to KNOCK THE SUN OUT OF ORBIT with flavor!

I am too modest and retiring to want to be voted for...I am always embarrassed by being found rrrowr.

Abbott, Friday, 31 August 2007 20:11 (eighteen years ago)

Fried bananas?

stevienixed, Friday, 31 August 2007 21:28 (eighteen years ago)

ILE = the new Tammany Hall.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 31 August 2007 22:08 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.fuk.de/img/gen_print_logo.gif

am0n, Friday, 31 August 2007 22:11 (eighteen years ago)

NO JIMMY MOD NO CREDIBILITY

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Friday, 31 August 2007 22:39 (eighteen years ago)

Any minute now! (admit it, everyone's refreshing like crazy, aren't you?)

StanM, Friday, 31 August 2007 22:58 (eighteen years ago)

uh... no.

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:00 (eighteen years ago)

THANK YOU KIND SOUL

chaki, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:00 (eighteen years ago)

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

ILX System, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:01 (eighteen years ago)

ILX System PWND!

StanM, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:02 (eighteen years ago)

THANK YOU KIND SOUL THAT VOTED FOR ME

chaki, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:03 (eighteen years ago)

THANK YOU CONFOUNDED

chaki, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:03 (eighteen years ago)

Remind me to vote for myself next time :-(

StanM, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:04 (eighteen years ago)

am0n 0

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v195/info1/200px-Big2.jpg

jergïns, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:05 (eighteen years ago)

i would like to take a moment to say WHAT'S UP to all 3 of my admirers and myself.

jergïns, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:06 (eighteen years ago)

speech! speech! (don't we have an award banner the winner can use on her blog or something?)

StanM, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:10 (eighteen years ago)

Jesse, you campaigned hard, man. Sorry there will be no delegates for you at the fuk convention.

Eazy, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:16 (eighteen years ago)

wait... if i voted for tombot, who did ally vote for?

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:16 (eighteen years ago)

that's 140 votes, people. awesome.

StanM, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:18 (eighteen years ago)

This poll goes on like the last 8 months for me!

dan m, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:19 (eighteen years ago)

Aw! I appreciate the vote, random ilxor (though you would be committing a felony, I think).

Tape Store, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:20 (eighteen years ago)

betcha anything ally voted for herself

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:20 (eighteen years ago)

who are the 8 people that voted for the hungry hungry hippo?

this indeed a disturbing universe.

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:22 (eighteen years ago)

i cant remember whether or not i voted for myself :/

max, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:24 (eighteen years ago)

You guys coming to the bar tonight? Turn you 0s into heros.

Eazy, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:24 (eighteen years ago)

OH JESUS CHRIST.

Trayce, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:25 (eighteen years ago)

And I didnt vote for myself!

Trayce, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:25 (eighteen years ago)

lil skrit now big skrit

jergïns, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:26 (eighteen years ago)

I got as many votes as Geir. I dont know what to think.

Trayce, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:27 (eighteen years ago)

eazy is hell bent on fuking us all.

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:29 (eighteen years ago)

getting you all fukked with my birthday drinks

Eazy, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:33 (eighteen years ago)

oh noes!

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:33 (eighteen years ago)

I've been defending Glenn Frey in a rare foray into ILM - I need a drink after that.

Eazy, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:36 (eighteen years ago)

or a sock in the nose, one or the other

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:37 (eighteen years ago)

how do you feel about Joe Walsh, while we're here?

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:38 (eighteen years ago)

Just a goof, that guy.

Eazy, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:39 (eighteen years ago)

btw: i'm fine with my zero, since on the noize poll I got 2 noize votes. I do not know who these people are, but I thank them.

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:40 (eighteen years ago)

I mean, look at these three videos from 1988 and tell me that Frey is not the class act.

Eazy, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:40 (eighteen years ago)

i wonder if a noize fuk is different.

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:40 (eighteen years ago)

Dude I fucking love Glen Frey.

Abbott, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:41 (eighteen years ago)

I have never been so happy to be unelectable in my life.

John Justen, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:42 (eighteen years ago)

that first video is not glen frey. But so far I'm having strange feelings. I want to hate it, but I don't.

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:43 (eighteen years ago)

Maybe Geir would fuck me if I wore a Paul McCartney mask :(

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:43 (eighteen years ago)

FIVE VOTES?!?! that's all i got after the hard-out campaigning i did? ;_;

ah well.

Rubyredd, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:43 (eighteen years ago)

CORRUPTION AT POLLS

http://images.encarta.msn.com/xrefmedia/sharemed/targets/images/pho/t039/T039367A.jpg

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:44 (eighteen years ago)

yeah here we go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZwu54S94-4

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:46 (eighteen years ago)

many thx to all the sexy, sexy ILXors who voted for me.

sanskrit, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:46 (eighteen years ago)

uh, except you kenan.

sanskrit, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:46 (eighteen years ago)

I got as many votes as Geir. I dont know what to think.

It means you were made for each other.

Heave Ho, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:47 (eighteen years ago)

I voted for tombot. Let the record show.

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:48 (eighteen years ago)

FIVE VOTES?!?! that's all i got after the hard-out campaigning i did? ;_;

I told you to show your boobs. But did you listen? Nooooo.

kenan, Friday, 31 August 2007 23:49 (eighteen years ago)

ok no video is better than this one

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7q1H3VKdp0

kenan, Saturday, 1 September 2007 00:11 (eighteen years ago)

thank goodness i voted myself

ken c, Saturday, 1 September 2007 00:21 (eighteen years ago)

i didn't even make the list! :(

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Saturday, 1 September 2007 00:33 (eighteen years ago)

wtf

ghost rider, Saturday, 1 September 2007 00:40 (eighteen years ago)

i know!

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Saturday, 1 September 2007 00:46 (eighteen years ago)

Having looked at the top three I can't work out whether this poll has been creepy, hilarious or just fucking weird.

Matt DC, Saturday, 1 September 2007 00:56 (eighteen years ago)

in that order?

Heave Ho, Saturday, 1 September 2007 01:10 (eighteen years ago)

Dys, the list was just the top 50 posters of the month in the stats I think.

Trayce, Saturday, 1 September 2007 01:12 (eighteen years ago)

Having looked at the top three I can't work out whether this poll has been creepy, hilarious or just fucking weird.

the first one

Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 1 September 2007 01:20 (eighteen years ago)

I will be paranoid for the rest of my life

Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 1 September 2007 01:22 (eighteen years ago)

am0n 0

-- jergïns, Friday, August 31, 2007 7:05 PM (2 hours ago)

Get confident, stupid

am0n, Saturday, 1 September 2007 01:36 (eighteen years ago)

Hey at least you only had one vote C, FIVE people voted for me, and now I'm worried they were all taking the piss, based on all the other high votes :(

Trayce, Saturday, 1 September 2007 01:45 (eighteen years ago)

dont worry trayce we werent!

chaki, Saturday, 1 September 2007 01:54 (eighteen years ago)

I will be paranoid for the rest of my life

-- Curt1s Stephens

srsly i wouldn't be that afraid of ralph

jergïns, Saturday, 1 September 2007 01:57 (eighteen years ago)

me, i embrace my three admirers (and myself)

jergïns, Saturday, 1 September 2007 01:58 (eighteen years ago)

fuck yeah, ralphie

Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 1 September 2007 02:02 (eighteen years ago)

Actually I think anyone who's seriously worried about this poll is taking ILX way too srsly anyway considering the whole poll was started as a joek.

Trayce, Saturday, 1 September 2007 02:03 (eighteen years ago)

I don't even know what a good number of these people look like

Hurting 2, Saturday, 1 September 2007 02:05 (eighteen years ago)

ummmm. i probably should have been included as an option. . . ? these poll results are irrelevant; if i'm not included. or, maybe it's just a given that we'd all like to have at me. . . ?

andi, Saturday, 1 September 2007 02:12 (eighteen years ago)

who are you?

Ms Misery, Saturday, 1 September 2007 02:27 (eighteen years ago)

haha

jergïns, Saturday, 1 September 2007 02:35 (eighteen years ago)

I don't even know what a good number of these people look like but i would still consider laying them under the right circumstances

jergïns, Saturday, 1 September 2007 02:36 (eighteen years ago)

I didn't vote for me

RJG, Saturday, 1 September 2007 03:02 (eighteen years ago)

or the schef (adam schefter ha ha)

RJG, Saturday, 1 September 2007 03:07 (eighteen years ago)

me either. i mean, i guess i would fuk myself but i don't think i would be my first choice.

Surmounter, Saturday, 1 September 2007 03:08 (eighteen years ago)

I'd like to think I didn't vote, but I may have just forgotten

milo z, Saturday, 1 September 2007 03:36 (eighteen years ago)

iirc i didn't vote either, but 4 whole votes, wau thanking u, dudez.

tehresa, Saturday, 1 September 2007 04:30 (eighteen years ago)

BIG ADAM aka the schefdriver

Hurting 2, Saturday, 1 September 2007 04:40 (eighteen years ago)

I like how my real persona (hah!) got two votes but this alter ego zero votes. What does it mean? WHAT THE HELL DOES IT MEAN?

stevienixed, Saturday, 1 September 2007 06:30 (eighteen years ago)

I've been to paradise, but I've never been to voted for me.

Trayce, Saturday, 1 September 2007 06:32 (eighteen years ago)

no fuk me = fuk u ALL

Jesse, Saturday, 1 September 2007 06:41 (eighteen years ago)

Hey! I got a vote! I didn't lose!

accentmonkey, Saturday, 1 September 2007 07:30 (eighteen years ago)

I like how my real persona (hah!) got two votes but this alter ego zero votes. What does it mean? WHAT THE HELL DOES IT MEAN?

You don't post pictures as often being stevienixed? Apparently ilxors are very "visually stimulated".

anatol_merklich, Saturday, 1 September 2007 09:04 (eighteen years ago)

No, that would mean that the schef is attrac*runs away giggling*

StanM, Saturday, 1 September 2007 09:29 (eighteen years ago)

(j/k - babes, computers a

StanM, Saturday, 1 September 2007 09:34 (eighteen years ago)

..nd rock stars be winning, no surprises)

StanM, Saturday, 1 September 2007 09:35 (eighteen years ago)

Ah yes, Stevie Nixed is "visually challenged." ;-)

nathalie, Saturday, 1 September 2007 09:36 (eighteen years ago)

I'm just annoyed I'm at the bottom of all the people on zero votes.

Matt DC, Saturday, 1 September 2007 09:42 (eighteen years ago)

It's almost like having negative votes, isn't it? :-/

StanM, Saturday, 1 September 2007 09:47 (eighteen years ago)

StanM -3

StanM, Saturday, 1 September 2007 09:47 (eighteen years ago)

Matt DC is the Leeds United of ILE

Mark C, Saturday, 1 September 2007 09:52 (eighteen years ago)

who's starting the "who won't u fuk" poll then?

ken c, Saturday, 1 September 2007 10:08 (eighteen years ago)

I don't want to know!

StanM, Saturday, 1 September 2007 10:26 (eighteen years ago)

lol best poll ever

i just wonder what the real adam schefter thinks abt all this

jhøshea, Saturday, 1 September 2007 12:31 (eighteen years ago)

ha thanks for the votes!

latebloomer, Saturday, 1 September 2007 12:35 (eighteen years ago)

Now Ally's going to be afraid to go to FAPs.
Thanks for the votes, yellow stone fans! I only didn't vote because I couldn't vote for EVERYONE!

Beth Parker, Saturday, 1 September 2007 14:14 (eighteen years ago)

that shouldve been an option

jhøshea, Saturday, 1 September 2007 14:22 (eighteen years ago)

For all of us serious sluts. You don't want to close off your options.

Beth Parker, Saturday, 1 September 2007 14:58 (eighteen years ago)

sluts = options

jhøshea, Saturday, 1 September 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)

░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░
░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██
██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░██░░

Heave Ho, Saturday, 1 September 2007 16:08 (eighteen years ago)

total lust

Heave Ho, Saturday, 1 September 2007 16:11 (eighteen years ago)

really unhealthy results

blueski, Saturday, 1 September 2007 16:53 (eighteen years ago)

don't be jealous of geir

mookieproof, Saturday, 1 September 2007 17:00 (eighteen years ago)

insert natural rhythm joke here

blueski, Saturday, 1 September 2007 17:06 (eighteen years ago)

wait, you mean these aren't votes for the real adam schefter? :(

Curt1s Stephens, Saturday, 1 September 2007 17:16 (eighteen years ago)

no.

http://mysthixx.free.fr/gallerie/neu3/alizee241.jpg

kenan, Saturday, 1 September 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)

God kenan u r gross

Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Saturday, 1 September 2007 18:02 (eighteen years ago)

how is that gross?

Mr. Que, Saturday, 1 September 2007 18:09 (eighteen years ago)

DONT BE AFRAID OF ALIZEEE THE FRENCH SINGERS

Mr. Que, Saturday, 1 September 2007 18:09 (eighteen years ago)

this poll is pretty gross, i will give you that

Mr. Que, Saturday, 1 September 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)

How is she, thesedays?

Mark G, Saturday, 1 September 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)

she must be all old by now, non?

The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Saturday, 1 September 2007 23:11 (eighteen years ago)

all growed up?

Heave Ho, Saturday, 1 September 2007 23:13 (eighteen years ago)

haha! here's thanking heave ho and the two mystery admirers...

Just got offed, Saturday, 1 September 2007 23:19 (eighteen years ago)

I would secretly kind of like to know who voted for me. Sort of.

Abbott, Saturday, 1 September 2007 23:55 (eighteen years ago)

1- Deeznuts

Heave Ho, Sunday, 2 September 2007 00:31 (eighteen years ago)

i didnt vote

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 2 September 2007 00:55 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.beakdotcom.com/buck.gif http://www.beakdotcom.com/meerkat.gif

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 2 September 2007 03:52 (eighteen years ago)

^^worth 5 votes

jergïns, Sunday, 2 September 2007 03:55 (eighteen years ago)

how many fuks is it worth

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 2 September 2007 04:18 (eighteen years ago)

one and a handjob?

jergïns, Sunday, 2 September 2007 04:25 (eighteen years ago)

who will i fuk

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 2 September 2007 04:25 (eighteen years ago)

who voted for Tape Store?

Curt1s Stephens, Sunday, 2 September 2007 05:36 (eighteen years ago)

http://data.tumblr.com/10018682_400.jpg

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 2 September 2007 05:53 (eighteen years ago)

who voted for Tape Store?

Hahah oh dear thats a mighty good question (maybe he voted for himself)

Trayce, Sunday, 2 September 2007 07:00 (eighteen years ago)

Well done Trayce! You done good.

moley, Sunday, 2 September 2007 07:23 (eighteen years ago)

Kate Masonic is rather hot, no question.

moley, Sunday, 2 September 2007 07:24 (eighteen years ago)

ban moley?

jergïns, Sunday, 2 September 2007 08:33 (eighteen years ago)

i didn't vote for myself.

Jordan Sargent, Sunday, 2 September 2007 08:42 (eighteen years ago)

glad you got your best friend from high school who'd do anything for you and is still kinda obsessed to sign up for ilx though

jergïns, Sunday, 2 September 2007 09:51 (eighteen years ago)

are talking to moley or js?

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 2 September 2007 10:21 (eighteen years ago)

i didn't know you in high school.

Jordan Sargent, Sunday, 2 September 2007 15:15 (eighteen years ago)

THANK YOU KIND SOULS (PLURAL! BOOM!) THAT VOTED FOR ME

still not joining the wdyll kru.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 2 September 2007 17:50 (eighteen years ago)

i didn't vote

river wolf, Sunday, 2 September 2007 20:12 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.uncov.com/assets/2007/6/25/hanging_chad.jpg

am0n, Sunday, 2 September 2007 20:15 (eighteen years ago)

Think I voted js.

W4LTER, Sunday, 2 September 2007 21:44 (eighteen years ago)

Jon that penis-horse-civet* thing is the funniest anigif I've seen for like ever. Wtf?

Also: unban moley immediately.

*) ok ok I don't know my mammal taxonomy, granted.

anatol_merklich, Sunday, 2 September 2007 22:29 (eighteen years ago)

well now i cant use 'fuk' anymore, thanks fagnan

cankles, Sunday, 2 September 2007 23:20 (eighteen years ago)

As noted above, I didn't vote for myself. I didn't vote at all.

Tape Store, Sunday, 2 September 2007 23:23 (eighteen years ago)

I almost voted for one of the zeros, though.

Tape Store, Sunday, 2 September 2007 23:24 (eighteen years ago)

zeroes? you mean HEROES.

kenan, Sunday, 2 September 2007 23:48 (eighteen years ago)

Okay this thread.

HI DERE, Sunday, 2 September 2007 23:55 (eighteen years ago)

ya i didnt click on it until today, clearly that was 2 soon~~

cankles, Monday, 3 September 2007 00:02 (eighteen years ago)

Since Alizée took a break from the music business, there was no confirmed official word regarding her comeback for almost 3 years. Her official site has been down since the summer of 2005. Since then, many rumors had surfaced, many of which eventually turned out to be false.

After almost two years of fan speculation, on April 3, 2006, a handwritten message, signed Alizée, was received by the webmaster of the fansite Le Nid d'Alizée, stating that she is working on the third album. Translated into English the message is as below.

Hello everyone!

Just want to let you know that I am currently in the studio...
The new songs are great!!
Kisses and I'll see you very soon!
I promise

Alizée 31 March 2006

On July 7, 2006, the show Le JT de la musique on French TV channel "Europe 2 TV" reported that Alizée has separated from her former producer and song writer Mylène Farmer and is now working on her third album. It was also reported that the lyrics of the new album are being penned by Jean Faulques. Her husband, Jérémy Châtelain, is also associated with the album. He has since confirmed this information in an interview.[5]

Recently it was known that Alizeé had left Polydor to sign a record deal with RCA Records/SonyBMG. She is currently at the studio recording some new material for her third studio album. The first single from the album, entitled Fifty-Sixty, is due to be released in September 2007. [22] Clips extracted from "Fifty-Sixty" have been distributed on sites like YouTube and on p2p programs such as E-Mule. Fifty-Sixty will make its radio debut in the week of August 27th, 2007.

kingfish, Monday, 3 September 2007 00:19 (eighteen years ago)

and she got married and had a kid

kingfish, Monday, 3 September 2007 00:20 (eighteen years ago)

NOOOOOO don't ban moley

moley, Monday, 3 September 2007 00:30 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah don't ban moley, he's the only one who appreciates the subtle power of the dad-joke!

Trayce, Monday, 3 September 2007 01:58 (eighteen years ago)

if i were you, i'd want to have sexy with me.

andi, Monday, 3 September 2007 02:41 (eighteen years ago)

cut-rate borat
-- Confounded, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 10:04 (3 months ago) Link

jergïns, Monday, 3 September 2007 09:32 (eighteen years ago)

THANK YOU KIND SOULS (PLURAL! BOOM!) THAT VOTED FOR ME

still not joining the wdyll kru.

-- That one guy that hit it and quit it, Sunday, 2 September 2007 17:50 (Yesterday)

my guess is: jed and rjg, or acrobat and frogman henry

blueski, Monday, 3 September 2007 09:52 (eighteen years ago)

Whoa!

OK, I don't know whether to be flattered or creeped out. Kind of a bit of both. But I'm still pleased to have been beaten by the system bump.

Masonic Boom, Monday, 3 September 2007 12:32 (eighteen years ago)

wait. Were people voting to 'fuck' the ilx system in the same way that NWA wanted to 'fuck' the police?

Ste, Monday, 3 September 2007 12:54 (eighteen years ago)

'fuk'

ken c, Monday, 3 September 2007 12:59 (eighteen years ago)

lol @ Matt DC coming in last

roxymuzak, Monday, 3 September 2007 14:15 (eighteen years ago)

thank goodness i voted for myself

Tracer Hand, Monday, 3 September 2007 14:16 (eighteen years ago)

I didn't vote

RJG, Monday, 3 September 2007 14:27 (eighteen years ago)

I should have voted

RJG, Monday, 3 September 2007 14:27 (eighteen years ago)

I should have voted for myself

RJG, Monday, 3 September 2007 14:27 (eighteen years ago)

but then if you only had 1 vote wouldn't that look worse than not voting and getting 0?

blueski, Monday, 3 September 2007 14:31 (eighteen years ago)

lol @ Matt DC coming in last

i wonder why it doesn't sort them alphabetically. i guess it just retains the original order of options if results are tied.

blueski, Monday, 3 September 2007 14:34 (eighteen years ago)

all the single votes are selfvotes?

RJG, Monday, 3 September 2007 14:35 (eighteen years ago)

half and half

blueski, Monday, 3 September 2007 14:38 (eighteen years ago)

if this poll isn't an incentive to post less, i don't know what is.

Pashmina, Monday, 3 September 2007 14:43 (eighteen years ago)

if this poll isn't an incentive to post less, i don't know what is.

Yeah, I've had "Smuggler's Blues" in my head all weekend ever since Kenan posted a link. If that's not an incentive to post less...

Eazy, Monday, 3 September 2007 15:10 (eighteen years ago)

I voted for The One Guy That Hit It & Quit It.

I would have liked to have been an option.

Tim F, Monday, 3 September 2007 15:27 (eighteen years ago)

if this poll isn't an incentive to post less, i don't know what is.

live & learn, fukkers!

Pleasant Plains, Monday, 3 September 2007 15:37 (eighteen years ago)

Some people on here are just very sexy and the results reflect that. Doesn't mean we can't still get along platonicly.

humansuit, Monday, 3 September 2007 18:07 (eighteen years ago)

who is the other person that voted for latebloomer???

roxymuzak, Monday, 3 September 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)

I would have voted for am0n

Curt1s Stephens, Monday, 3 September 2007 18:50 (eighteen years ago)

I think we need to do this again, just to see what happens :-)

StanM, Monday, 3 September 2007 18:53 (eighteen years ago)

i did not vote in this :/ hm
i did not really pay attn to this thread
and here we are. but hey.

rrrobyn, Monday, 3 September 2007 19:02 (eighteen years ago)

NRQ, go get lucky

Just got offed, Monday, 3 September 2007 19:12 (eighteen years ago)

Good morning, everybody. I want to talk this morning about social software ...there's a surprise. I want to talk about a pattern I've seen over and over again in social software that supports large and long-lived groups. And that pattern is the pattern described in the title of this talk: "A Group Is Its Own Worst Enemy."

In particular, I want to talk about what I now think is one of the core challenges for designing large-scale social software. Let me offer a definition of social software, because it's a term that's still fairly amorphous. My definition is fairly simple: It's software that supports group interaction. I also want to emphasize, although that's a fairly simple definition, how radical that pattern is. The Internet supports lots of communications patterns, principally point-to-point and two-way, one-to-many outbound, and many-to-many two-way.

Prior to the Internet, we had lots of patterns that supported point-to-point two-way. We had telephones, we had the telegraph. We were familiar with technological mediation of those kinds of conversations. Prior to the Internet, we had lots of patterns that supported one-way outbound. I could put something on television or the radio, I could publish a newspaper. We had the printing press. So although the Internet does good things for those patterns, they're patterns we knew from before.

Prior to the Internet, the last technology that had any real effect on the way people sat down and talked together was the table. There was no technological mediation for group conversations. The closest we got was the conference call, which never really worked right -- "Hello? Do I push this button now? Oh, shoot, I just hung up." It's not easy to set up a conference call, but it's very easy to email five of your friends and say "Hey, where are we going for pizza?" So ridiculously easy group forming is really news.

We've had social software for 40 years at most, dated from the Plato BBS system, and we've only had 10 years or so of widespread availability, so we're just finding out what works. We're still learning how to make these kinds of things.

Now, software that supports group interaction is a fundamentally unsatisfying definition in many ways, because it doesn't point to a specific class of technology. If you look at email, it obviously supports social patterns, but it can also support a broadcast pattern. If I'm a spammer, I'm going to mail things out to a million people, but they're not going to be talking to one another, and I'm not going to be talking to them -- spam is email, but it isn't social. If I'm mailing you, and you're mailing me back, we're having point-to-point and two-way conversation, but not one that creates group dynamics.

So email doesn't necessarily support social patterns, group patterns, although it can. Ditto a weblog. If I'm Glenn Reynolds, and I'm publishing something with Comments Off and reaching a million users a month, that's really broadcast. It's interesting that I can do it as a single individual, but the pattern is closer to MSNBC than it is to a conversation. If it's a cluster of half a dozen LiveJournal users, on the other hand, talking about their lives with one another, that's social. So, again, weblogs are not necessarily social, although they can support social patterns.

Nevertheless, I think that definition is the right one, because it recognizes the fundamentally social nature of the problem. Groups are a run-time effect. You cannot specify in advance what the group will do, and so you can't substantiate in software everything you expect to have happen.

Now, there's a large body of literature saying "We built this software, a group came and used it, and they began to exhibit behaviors that surprised us enormously, so we've gone and documented these behaviors." Over and over and over again this pattern comes up. (I hear Stewart [Brand, of the WELL] laughing.) The WELL is one of those places where this pattern came up over and over again.

This talk is in three parts. The best explanation I have found for the kinds of things that happen when groups of humans interact is psychological research that predates the Internet, so the first part is going to be about W.R. Bion's research, which I will talk about in a moment, research that I believe explains how and why a group is its own worst enemy.

The second part is: Why now? What's going on now that makes this worth thinking about? I think we're seeing a revolution in social software in the current environment that's really interesting.

And third, I want to identify some things, about half a dozen things, in fact, that I think are core to any software that supports larger, long-lived groups.

Part One: How is a group its own worst enemy?

So, Part One. The best explanation I have found for the ways in which this pattern establishes itself, the group is its own worst enemy, comes from a book by W.R. Bion called "Experiences in Groups," written in the middle of the last century.

Bion was a psychologist who was doing group therapy with groups of neurotics. (Drawing parallels between that and the Internet is left as an exercise for the reader.) The thing that Bion discovered was that the neurotics in his care were, as a group, conspiring to defeat therapy.

There was no overt communication or coordination. But he could see that whenever he would try to do anything that was meant to have an effect, the group would somehow quash it. And he was driving himself crazy, in the colloquial sense of the term, trying to figure out whether or not he should be looking at the situation as: Are these individuals taking action on their own? Or is this a coordinated group?

He could never resolve the question, and so he decided that the unresolvability of the question was the answer. To the question: Do you view groups of people as aggregations of individuals or as a cohesive group, his answer was: "Hopelessly committed to both."

He said that humans are fundamentally individual, and also fundamentally social. Every one of us has a kind of rational decision-making mind where we can assess what's going on and make decisions and act on them. And we are all also able to enter viscerally into emotional bonds with other groups of people that transcend the intellectual aspects of the individual.

In fact, Bion was so convinced that this was the right answer that the image he put on the front cover of his book was a Necker cube, one of those cubes that you can look at and make resolve in one of two ways, but you can never see both views of the cube at the same time. So groups can be analyzed both as collections of individuals and having this kind of emotive group experience.

Now, it's pretty easy to see how groups of people who have formal memberships, groups that have been labeled and named like "I am a member of such-and-such a guild in a massively multi-player online role-playing game," it's easy to see how you would have some kind of group cohesion there. But Bion's thesis is that this effect is much, much deeper, and kicks in much, much sooner than many of us expect. So I want to illustrate this with a story, and to illustrate the illustration, I'll use a story from your life. Because even if I don't know you, I know what I'm about to describe has happened to you.

You are at a party, and you get bored. You say "This isn't doing it for me anymore. I'd rather be someplace else. I'd rather be home asleep. The people I wanted to talk to aren't here." Whatever. The party fails to meet some threshold of interest. And then a really remarkable thing happens: You don't leave. You make a decision "I don't like this." If you were in a bookstore and you said "I'm done," you'd walk out. If you were in a coffee shop and said "This is boring," you'd walk out.

You're sitting at a party, you decide "I don't like this; I don't want to be here." And then you don't leave. That kind of social stickiness is what Bion is talking about.

And then, another really remarkable thing happens. Twenty minutes later, one person stands up and gets their coat, and what happens? Suddenly everyone is getting their coats on, all at the same time. Which means that everyone had decided that the party was not for them, and no one had done anything about it, until finally this triggering event let the air out of the group, and everyone kind of felt okay about leaving.

This effect is so steady it's sometimes called the paradox of groups. It's obvious that there are no groups without members. But what's less obvious is that there are no members without a group. Because what would you be a member of?

So there's this very complicated moment of a group coming together, where enough individuals, for whatever reason, sort of agree that something worthwhile is happening, and the decision they make at that moment is: This is good and must be protected. And at that moment, even if it's subconscious, you start getting group effects. And the effects that we've seen come up over and over and over again in online communities.

Now, Bion decided that what he was watching with the neurotics was the group defending itself against his attempts to make the group do what they said they were supposed to do. The group was convened to get better, this group of people was in therapy to get better. But they were defeating that. And he said, there are some very specific patterns that they're entering into to defeat the ostensible purpose of the group meeting together. And he detailed three patterns.

The first is sex talk, what he called, in his mid-century prose, "A group met for pairing off." And what that means is, the group conceives of its purpose as the hosting of flirtatious or salacious talk or emotions passing between pairs of members.

You go on IRC and you scan the channel list, and you say "Oh, I know what that group is about, because I see the channel label." And you go into the group, you will also almost invariably find that it's about sex talk as well. Not necessarily overt. But that is always in scope in human conversations, according to Bion. That is one basic pattern that groups can always devolve into, away from the sophisticated purpose and towards one of these basic purposes.

The second basic pattern that Bion detailed: The identification and vilification of external enemies. This is a very common pattern. Anyone who was around the Open Source movement in the mid-Nineties could see this all the time. If you cared about Linux on the desktop, there was a big list of jobs to do. But you could always instead get a conversation going about Microsoft and Bill Gates. And people would start bleeding from their ears, they would get so mad.

If you want to make it better, there's a list of things to do. It's Open Source, right? Just fix it. "No, no, Microsoft and Bill Gates grrrrr ...", the froth would start coming out. The external enemy -- nothing causes a group to galvanize like an external enemy.

So even if someone isn't really your enemy, identifying them as an enemy can cause a pleasant sense of group cohesion. And groups often gravitate towards members who are the most paranoid and make them leaders, because those are the people who are best at identifying external enemies.

The third pattern Bion identified: Religious veneration. The nomination and worship of a religious icon or a set of religious tenets. The religious pattern is, essentially, we have nominated something that's beyond critique. You can see this pattern on the Internet any day you like. Go onto a Tolkein newsgroup or discussion forum, and try saying "You know, The Two Towers is a little dull. I mean loooong. We didn't need that much description about the forest, because it's pretty much the same forest all the way."

Try having that discussion. On the door of the group it will say: "This is for discussing the works of Tolkein." Go in and try and have that discussion.

Now, in some places people say "Yes, but it needed to, because it had to convey the sense of lassitude," or whatever. But in most places you'll simply be flamed to high heaven, because you're interfering with the religious text.

So these are human patterns that have shown up on the Internet, not because of the software, but because it's being used by humans. Bion has identified this possibility of groups sandbagging their sophisticated goals with these basic urges. And what he finally came to, in analyzing this tension, is that group structure is necessary. Robert's Rules of Order are necessary. Constitutions are necessary. Norms, rituals, laws, the whole list of ways that we say, out of the universe of possible behaviors, we're going to draw a relatively small circle around the acceptable ones.

He said the group structure is necessary to defend the group from itself. Group structure exists to keep a group on target, on track, on message, on charter, whatever. To keep a group focused on its own sophisticated goals and to keep a group from sliding into these basic patterns. Group structure defends the group from the action of its own members.

In the Seventies -- this is a pattern that's shown up on the network over and over again -- in the Seventies, a BBS called Communitree launched, one of the very early dial-up BBSes. This was launched when people didn't own computers, institutions owned computers.

Communitree was founded on the principles of open access and free dialogue. "Communitree" -- the name just says "California in the Seventies." And the notion was, effectively, throw off structure and new and beautiful patterns will arise.

And, indeed, as anyone who has put discussion software into groups that were previously disconnected has seen, that does happen. Incredible things happen. The early days of Echo, the early days of usenet, the early days of Lucasfilms Habitat, over and over again, you see all this incredible upwelling of people who suddenly are connected in ways they weren't before.

And then, as time sets in, difficulties emerge. In this case, one of the difficulties was occasioned by the fact that one of the institutions that got hold of some modems was a high school. And who, in 1978, was hanging out in the room with the computer and the modems in it, but the boys of that high school. And the boys weren't terribly interested in sophisticated adult conversation. They were interested in fart jokes. They were interested in salacious talk. They were interested in running amok and posting four-letter words and nyah-nyah-nyah, all over the bulletin board.

And the adults who had set up Communitree were horrified, and overrun by these students. The place that was founded on open access had too much open access, too much openness. They couldn't defend themselves against their own users. The place that was founded on free speech had too much freedom. They had no way of saying "No, that's not the kind of free speech we meant."

But that was a requirement. In order to defend themselves against being overrun, that was something that they needed to have that they didn't have, and as a result, they simply shut the site down.

Now you could ask whether or not the founders' inability to defend themselves from this onslaught, from being overrun, was a technical or a social problem. Did the software not allow the problem to be solved? Or was it the social configuration of the group that founded it, where they simply couldn't stomach the idea of adding censorship to protect their system. But in a way, it doesn't matter, because technical and social issues are deeply intertwined. There's no way to completely separate them.

What matters is, a group designed this and then was unable, in the context they'd set up, partly a technical and partly a social context, to save it from this attack from within. And attack from within is what matters. Communitree wasn't shut down by people trying to crash or syn-flood the server. It was shut down by people logging in and posting, which is what the system was designed to allow. The technological pattern of normal use and attack were identical at the machine level, so there was no way to specify technologically what should and shouldn't happen. Some of the users wanted the system to continue to exist and to provide a forum for discussion. And other of the users, the high school boys, either didn't care or were actively inimical. And the system provided no way for the former group to defend itself from the latter.

Now, this story has been written many times. It's actually frustrating to see how many times it's been written. You'd hope that at some point that someone would write it down, and they often do, but what then doesn't happen is other people don't read it.

The most charitable description of this repeated pattern is "learning from experience." But learning from experience is the worst possible way to learn something. Learning from experience is one up from remembering. That's not great. The best way to learn something is when someone else figures it out and tells you: "Don't go in that swamp. There are alligators in there."

Learning from experience about the alligators is lousy, compared to learning from reading, say. There hasn't been, unfortunately, in this arena, a lot of learning from reading. And so, lessons from Lucasfilms' Habitat, written in 1990, reads a lot like Rose Stone's description of Communitree from 1978.

This pattern has happened over and over and over again. Someone built the system, they assumed certain user behaviors. The users came on and exhibited different behaviors. And the people running the system discovered to their horror that the technological and social issues could not in fact be decoupled.

There's a great document called "LambdaMOO Takes a New Direction," which is about the wizards of LambdaMOO, Pavel Curtis's Xerox PARC experiment in building a MUD world. And one day the wizards of LambdaMOO announced "We've gotten this system up and running, and all these interesting social effects are happening. Henceforth we wizards will only be involved in technological issues. We're not going to get involved in any of that social stuff."

And then, I think about 18 months later -- I don't remember the exact gap of time -- they come back. The wizards come back, extremely cranky. And they say: "What we have learned from you whining users is that we can't do what we said we would do. We cannot separate the technological aspects from the social aspects of running a virtual world.

"So we're back, and we're taking wizardly fiat back, and we're going to do things to run the system. We are effectively setting ourselves up as a government, because this place needs a government, because without us, the place was falling apart."

People who work on social software are closer in spirit to economists and political scientists than they are to people making compilers. They both look like programming, but when you're dealing with groups of people as one of your run-time phenomena, that is an incredibly different practice. In the political realm, we would call these kinds of crises a constitutional crisis. It's what happens when the tension between the individual and the group, and the rights and responsibilities of individuals and groups, gets so serious that something has to be done.

And the worst crisis is the first crisis, because it's not just "We need to have some rules." It's also "We need to have some rules for making some rules." And this is what we see over and over again in large and long-lived social software systems. Constitutions are a necessary component of large, long-lived, heterogenous groups.

Geoff Cohen has a great observation about this. He said "The likelihood that any unmoderated group will eventually get into a flame-war about whether or not to have a moderator approaches one as time increases." As a group commits to its existence as a group, and begins to think that the group is good or important, the chance that they will begin to call for additional structure, in order to defend themselves from themselves, gets very, very high.

Part Two: Why now?

If these things I'm saying have happened so often before, have been happening and been documented and we've got psychological literature that predates the Internet, what's going on now that makes this important?

I can't tell you precisely why, but observationally there is a revolution in social software going on. The number of people writing tools to support or enhance group collaboration or communication is astonishing.

The web turned us all into size queens for six or eight years there. It was loosely coupled, it was stateless, it scaled like crazy, and everything became about How big can you get? "How many users does Yahoo have? How many customers does Amazon have? How many readers does MSNBC have?" And the answer could be "Really a lot!" But it could only be really a lot if you didn't require MSNBC to be answering those readers, and you didn't require those readers to be talking to one another.

The downside of going for size and scale above all else is that the dense, interconnected pattern that drives group conversation and collaboration isn't supportable at any large scale. Less is different -- small groups of people can engage in kinds of interaction that large groups can't. And so we blew past that interesting scale of small groups. Larger than a dozen, smaller than a few hundred, where people can actually have these conversational forms that can't be supported when you're talking about tens of thousands or millions of users, at least in a single group.

We've had things like mailing lists and BBSes for a long time, and more recently we've had IM, we've had these various patterns. And now, all of a sudden, these things are popping up. We've gotten weblogs and wikis, and I think, even more importantly, we're getting platform stuff. We're getting RSS. We're getting shared Flash objects. We're getting ways to quickly build on top of some infrastructure we can take for granted, that lets us try new things very rapidly.

I was talking to Stewart Butterfield about the chat application they're trying here. I said "Hey, how's that going?" He said: "Well, we only had the idea for it two weeks ago. So this is the launch." When you can go from "Hey, I've got an idea" to "Let's launch this in front of a few hundred serious geeks and see how it works," that suggests that there's a platform there that is letting people do some really interesting things really quickly. It's not that you couldn't have built a similar application a couple of years ago, but the cost would have been much higher. And when you lower costs, interesting new kinds of things happen.

So the first answer to Why Now? is simply "Because it's time." I can't tell you why it took as long for weblogs to happen as it did, except to say it had absolutely nothing to do with technology. We had every bit of technology we needed to do weblogs the day Mosaic launched the first forms-capable browser. Every single piece of it was right there. Instead, we got Geocities. Why did we get Geocities and not weblogs? We didn't know what we were doing.

One was a bad idea, the other turns out to be a really good idea. It took a long time to figure out that people talking to one another, instead of simply uploading badly-scanned photos of their cats, would be a useful pattern.

We got the weblog pattern in around '96 with Drudge. We got weblog platforms starting in '98. The thing really was taking off in 2000. By last year, everyone realized: Omigod, this thing is going mainstream, and it's going to change everything.

The vertigo moment for me was when Phil Gyford launched the Pepys weblog, Samuel Pepys' diaries of the 1660's turned into a weblog form, with a new post every day from Pepys' diary. What that said to me was: Phil was asserting, and I now believe, that weblogs will be around for at least 10 years, because that's how long Pepys kept a diary. And that was this moment of projecting into the future: This is now infrastructure we can take for granted.

Why was there an eight-year gap between a forms-capable browser and the Pepys diaries? I don't know. It just takes a while for people to get used to these ideas.

So, first of all, this is a revolution in part because it is a revolution. We've internalized the ideas and people are now working with them. Second, the things that people are now building are web-native.

When you got social software on the web in the mid-Nineties, a lot of it was: "This is the Giant Lotus Dreadnought, now with New Lightweight Web Interface!" It never felt like the web. It felt like this hulking thing with a little, you know, "Here's some icons. Don't look behind the curtain."

A weblog is web-native. It's the web all the way in. A wiki is a web-native way of hosting collaboration. It's lightweight, it's loosely coupled, it's easy to extend, it's easy to break down. And it's not just the surface, like oh, you can just do things in a form. It assumes http is transport. It assumes markup in the coding. RSS is a web-native way of doing syndication. So we're taking all of these tools and we're extending them in a way that lets us build new things really quickly.

Third, in David Weinberger's felicitous phrase, we can now start to have a Small Pieces Loosely Joined pattern. It's really worthwhile to look into what Joi Ito is doing with the Emergent Democracy movement, even if you're not interested in the themes of emerging democracy. This started because a conversation was going on, and Ito said "I am frustrated. I'm sitting here in Japan, and I know all of these people are having these conversations in real-time with one another. I want to have a group conversation, too. I'll start a conference call.

"But since conference calls are so lousy on their own, I'm going to bring up a chat window at the same time." And then, in the first meeting, I think it was Pete Kaminski said "Well, I've also opened up a wiki, and here's the URL." And he posted it in the chat window. And people can start annotating things. People can start adding bookmarks; here are the lists.

So, suddenly you've got this meeting, which is going on in three separate modes at the same time, two in real-time and one annotated. So you can have the conference call going on, and you know how conference calls are. Either one or two people dominate it, or everyone's like "Oh, can I -- no, but --", everyone interrupting and cutting each other off.

It's very difficult to coordinate a conference call, because people can't see one another, which makes it hard to manage the interrupt logic. In Joi's conference call, the interrupt logic got moved to the chat room. People would type "Hand," and the moderator of the conference call will then type "You're speaking next," in the chat. So the conference call flowed incredibly smoothly.

Meanwhile, in the chat, people are annotating what people are saying. "Oh, that reminds me of So-and-so's work." Or "You should look at this URL...you should look at that ISBN number." In a conference call, to read out a URL, you have to spell it out -- "No, no, no, it's w w w dot net dash..." In a chat window, you get it and you can click on it right there. You can say, in the conference call or the chat: "Go over to the wiki and look at this."

This is a broadband conference call, but it isn't a giant thing. It's just three little pieces of software laid next to each other and held together with a little bit of social glue. This is an incredibly powerful pattern. It's different from: Let's take the Lotus juggernaut and add a web front-end.

And finally, and this is the thing that I think is the real freakout, is ubiquity. The web has been growing for a long, long time. And so some people had web access, and then lots of people had web access, and then most people had web access.

But something different is happening now. In many situations, all people have access to the network. And "all" is a different kind of amount than "most." "All" lets you start taking things for granted.

Now, the Internet isn't everywhere in the world. It isn't even everywhere in the developed world. But for some groups of people -- students, people in high-tech offices, knowledge workers -- everyone they work with is online. Everyone they're friends with is online. Everyone in their family is online.

And this pattern of ubiquity lets you start taking this for granted. Bill Joy once said "My method is to look at something that seems like a good idea and assume it's true." We're starting to see software that simply assumes that all offline groups will have an online component, no matter what.

It is now possible for every grouping, from a Girl Scout troop on up, to have an online component, and for it to be lightweight and easy to manage. And that's a different kind of thing than the old pattern of "online community." I have this image of two hula hoops, the old two-hula hoop world, where my real life is over here, and my online life is over there, and there wasn't much overlap between them. If the hula hoops are swung together, and everyone who's offline is also online, at least from my point of view, that's a different kind of pattern.

There's a second kind of ubiquity, which is the kind we're enjoying here thanks to Wifi. If you assume whenever a group of people are gathered together, that they can be both face to face and online at the same time, you can start to do different kinds of things. I now don't run a meeting without either having a chat room or a wiki up and running. Three weeks ago I ran a meeting for the Library of Congress. We had a wiki, set up by Socialtext, to capture a large and very dense amount of technical information on long-term digital preservation.

The people who organized the meeting had never used a wiki before, and now the Library of Congress is talking as if they always had a wiki for their meetings, and are assuming it's going to be at the next meeting as well -- the wiki went from novel to normal in a couple of days.

It really quickly becomes an assumption that a group can do things like "Oh, I took my PowerPoint slides, I showed them, and then I dumped them into the wiki. So now you can get at them." It becomes a sort of shared repository for group memory. This is new. These kinds of ubiquity, both everyone is online, and everyone who's in a room can be online together at the same time, can lead to new patterns.

Part Three: What can we take for granted?

If these assumptions are right, one that a group is its own worst enemy, and two, we're seeing this explosion of social software, what should we do? Is there anything we can say with any certainty about building social software, at least for large and long-lived groups?

I think there is. A little over 10 years ago, I quit my day job, because Usenet was so interesting, I thought: This is really going to be big. And I actually wrote a book about net culture at the time: Usenet, the Well, Echo, IRC and so forth. It launched in April of '95, just as that world was being washed away by the web. But it was my original interest, so I've been looking at this problem in one way or another for 10 years, and I've been looking at it pretty hard for the a year and a half or so.

So there's this question "What is required to make a large, long-lived online group successful?" and I think I can now answer with some confidence: "It depends." I'm hoping to flesh that answer out a little bit in the next ten years.

But I can at least say some of the things it depends on. The Calvinists had a doctrine of natural grace and supernatural grace. Natural grace was "You have to do all the right things in the world to get to heaven..." and supernatural grace was "...and God has to anoint you." And you never knew if you had supernatural grace or not. This was their way of getting around the fact that the Book of Revelations put an upper limit on the number of people who were going to heaven.

Social software is like that. You can find the same piece of code running in many, many environments. And sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. So there is something supernatural about groups being a run-time experience.

The normal experience of social software is failure. If you go into Yahoo groups and you map out the subscriptions, it is, unsurprisingly, a power law. There's a small number of highly populated groups, a moderate number of moderately populated groups, and this long, flat tail of failure. And the failure is inevitably more than 50% of the total mailing lists in any category. So it's not like a cake recipe. There's nothing you can do to make it come out right every time.

There are, however, I think, about half a dozen things that are broadly true of all the groups I've looked at and all the online constitutions I've read for software that supports large and long-lived groups. And I'd break that list in half. I'd say, if you are going to create a piece of social software designed to support large groups, you have to accept three things, and design for four things.

Three Things to Accept

1.) Of the things you have to accept, the first is that you cannot completely separate technical and social issues. There are two attractive patterns. One says, we'll handle technology over `here, we'll do social issues there. We'll have separate mailing lists with separate discussion groups, or we'll have one track here and one track there. This doesn't work. It's never been stated more clearly than in the pair of documents called "LambdaMOO Takes a New Direction." I can do no better than to point you to those documents.

But recently we've had this experience where there was a social software discussion list, and someone said "I know, let's set up a second mailing list for technical issues." And no one moved from the first list, because no one could fork the conversation between social and technical issues, because the conversation can't be forked.

The other pattern that's very, very attractive -- anybody who looks at this stuff has the same epiphany, which is: "Omigod, this software is determining what people do!" And that is true, up to a point. But you cannot completely program social issues either. So you can't separate the two things, and you also can't specify all social issues in technology. The group is going to assert its rights somehow, and you're going to get this mix of social and technological effects.

So the group is real. It will exhibit emergent effects. It can't be ignored, and it can't be programmed, which means you have an ongoing issue. And the best pattern, or at least the pattern that's worked the most often, is to put into the hands of the group itself the responsibility for defining what value is, and defending that value, rather than trying to ascribe those things in the software upfront.

2.) The second thing you have to accept: Members are different than users. A pattern will arise in which there is some group of users that cares more than average about the integrity and success of the group as a whole. And that becomes your core group, Art Kleiner's phrase for "the group within the group that matters most."

The core group on Communitree was undifferentiated from the group of random users that came in. They were separate in their own minds, because they knew what they wanted to do, but they couldn't defend themselves against the other users. But in all successful online communities that I've looked at, a core group arises that cares about and gardens effectively. Gardens the environment, to keep it growing, to keep it healthy.

Now, the software does not always allow the core group to express itself, which is why I say you have to accept this. Because if the software doesn't allow the core group to express itself, it will invent new ways of doing so.

On alt.folklore.urban , the discussion group about urban folklore on Usenet, there was a group of people who hung out there and got to be friends. And they came to care about the existence of AFU, to the point where, because Usenet made no distinction between members in good standing and drive-by users, they set up a mailing list called The Old Hats. The mailing list was for meta-discussion, discussion about AFU, so they could coordinate efforts formally if they were going to troll someone or flame someone or ignore someone, on the mailing list.

Addendum, July 2, 2003: A longtime a.f.u participant says that the Old Hat list was created to allow the Silicon Valley-dwelling members to plan a barbecue, so that they could add a face-to-face dimension to their virtual interaction. The use of the list as a backstage area for discussing the public newsgroup arose after the fact.

Then, as Usenet kept growing, many newcomers came along and seemed to like the environment, because it was well-run. In order to defend themselves from the scaling issues that come from of adding a lot of new members to the Old Hats list, they said "We're starting a second list, called the Young Hats."

So they created this three-tier system, not dissimilar to the tiers of anonymous cowards, logged-in users, and people with high karma on Slashdot. But because Usenet didn't let them do it in the software, they brought in other pieces of software, these mailing lists, that they needed to build the structure. So you don't get the program users, the members in good standing will find one another and be recognized to one another.

3.) The third thing you need to accept: The core group has rights that trump individual rights in some situations. This pulls against the libertarian view that's quite common on the network, and it absolutely pulls against the one person/one vote notion. But you can see examples of how bad an idea voting is when citizenship is the same as ability to log in.

In the early Nineties, a proposal went out to create a Usenet news group for discussing Tibetan culture, called soc.culture.tibet. And it was voted down, in large part because a number of Chinese students who had Internet access voted it down, on the logic that Tibet wasn't a country; it was a region of China. And in their view, since Tibet wasn't a country, there oughtn't be any place to discuss its culture, because that was oxymoronic.

Now, everyone could see that this was the wrong answer. The people who wanted a place to discuss Tibetan culture should have it. That was the core group. But because the one person/one vote model on Usenet said "Anyone who's on Usenet gets to vote on any group," sufficiently contentious groups could simply be voted away.

Imagine today if, in the United States, Internet users had to be polled before any anti-war group could be created. Or French users had to be polled before any pro-war group could be created. The people who want to have those discussions are the people who matter. And absolute citizenship, with the idea that if you can log in, you are a citizen, is a harmful pattern, because it is the tyranny of the majority.

So the core group needs ways to defend itself -- both in getting started and because of the effects I talked about earlier -- the core group needs to defend itself so that it can stay on its sophisticated goals and away from its basic instincts.

The Wikipedia has a similar system today, with a volunteer fire department, a group of people who care to an unusual degree about the success of the Wikipedia. And they have enough leverage, because of the way wikis work, they can always roll back graffiti and so forth, that that thing has stayed up despite repeated attacks. So leveraging the core group is a really powerful system.

Now, when I say these are three things you have to accept, I mean you have to accept them. Because if you don't accept them upfront, they'll happen to you anyway. And then you'll end up writing one of those documents that says "Oh, we launched this and we tried it, and then the users came along and did all these weird things. And now we're documenting it so future ages won't make this mistake." Even though you didn't read the thing that was written in 1978.

All groups of any integrity have a constitution. The constitution is always partly formal and partly informal. At the very least, the formal part is what's substantiated in code -- "the software works this way."

The informal part is the sense of "how we do it around here." And no matter how is substantiated in code or written in charter, whatever, there will always be an informal part as well. You can't separate the two.

Four Things to Design For

1.) If you were going to build a piece of social software to support large and long-lived groups, what would you design for? The first thing you would design for is handles the user can invest in.

Now, I say "handles," because I don't want to say "identity," because identity has suddenly become one of those ideas where, when you pull on the little thread you want, this big bag of stuff comes along with it. Identity is such a hot-button issue now, but for the lightweight stuff required for social software, its really just a handle that matters.

It's pretty widely understood that anonymity doesn't work well in group settings, because "who said what when" is the minimum requirement for having a conversation. What's less well understood is that weak pseudonymity doesn't work well, either. Because I need to associate who's saying something to me now with previous conversations.

The world's best reputation management system is right here, in the brain. And actually, it's right here, in the back, in the emotional part of the brain. Almost all the work being done on reputation systems today is either trivial or useless or both, because reputations aren't linearizable, and they're not portable.

There are people who cheat on their spouse but not at cards, and vice versa, and both and neither. Reputation is not necessarily portable from one situation to another, and it's not easily expressed.

eBay has done us all an enormous disservice, because eBay works in non-iterated atomic transactions, which are the opposite of social situations. eBay's reputation system works incredibly well, because it starts with a linearizable transaction -- "How much money for how many Smurfs?" -- and turns that into a metric that's equally linear.

That doesn't work well in social situations. If you want a good reputation system, just let me remember who you are. And if you do me a favor, I'll remember it. And I won't store it in the front of my brain, I'll store it here, in the back. I'll just get a good feeling next time I get email from you; I won't even remember why. And if you do me a disservice and I get email from you, my temples will start to throb, and I won't even remember why. If you give users a way of remembering one another, reputation will happen, and that requires nothing more than simple and somewhat persistent handles.

Users have to be able to identify themselves and there has to be a penalty for switching handles. The penalty for switching doesn't have to be total. But if I change my handle on the system, I have to lose some kind of reputation or some kind of context. This keeps the system functioning.

Now, this pulls against the sense that we've had since the early psychological writings about the Internet. "Oh, on the Internet we're all going to be changing identities and genders like we change our socks."

And you see things like the Kaycee Nicole story, where a woman in Kansas pretended to be a high school student, and then because the invented high school student's friends got so emotionally involved, she then tried to kill the Kaycee Nicole persona off. "Oh, she's got cancer and she's dying and it's all very tragic." And of course, everyone wanted to fly to meet her. So then she sort of panicked and vanished. And a bunch of places on the Internet, particularly the MetaFilter community, rose up to find out what was going on, and uncovered the hoax. It was sort of a distributed detective movement.

Now a number of people point to this and say "See, I told you about that identity thing!" But the Kaycee Nicole story is this: changing your identity is really weird. And when the community understands that you've been doing it and you're faking, that is seen as a huge and violent transgression. And they will expend an astonishing amount of energy to find you and punish you. So identity is much less slippery than the early literature would lead us to believe.

2.) Second, you have to design a way for there to be members in good standing. Have to design some way in which good works get recognized. The minimal way is, posts appear with identity. You can do more sophisticated things like having formal karma or "member since."

I'm on the fence about whether or not this is a design or accepting. Because in a way I think members in good standing will rise. But more and more of the systems I'm seeing launching these days are having some kind of additional accretion so you can tell how much involvement members have with the system.

There's an interesting pattern I'm seeing among the music-sharing group that operates between Tokyo and Hong Kong. They operate on a mailing list, which they set up for themselves. But when they're trading music, what they're doing is, they're FedExing one another 180-gig hard-drives. So you're getting .wav files and not MP3s, and you're getting them in bulk.

Now, you can imagine that such a system might be a target for organizations that would frown on this activity. So when you join that group, your user name is appended with the user name of the person who is your sponsor. You can't get in without your name being linked to someone else. You can see immediately the reputational effects going on there, just from linking two handles.

So in that system, you become a member in good standing when your sponsor link goes away and you're there on your own report. If, on the other hand, you defect, not only are you booted, but your sponsor is booted. There are lots and lots of lightweight ways to accept and work with the idea of member in good standing.

3.) Three, you need barriers to participation. This is one of the things that killed Usenet. You have to have some cost to either join or participate, if not at the lowest level, then at higher levels. There needs to be some kind of segmentation of capabilities.

Now, the segmentation can be total -- you're in or you're out, as with the music group I just listed. Or it can be partial -- anyone can read Slashdot, anonymous cowards can post, non-anonymous cowards can post with a higher rating. But to moderate, you really have to have been around for a while.

It has to be hard to do at least some things on the system for some users, or the core group will not have the tools that they need to defend themselves.

Now, this pulls against the cardinal virtue of ease of use. But ease of use is wrong. Ease of use is the wrong way to look at the situation, because you've got the Necker cube flipped in the wrong direction. The user of social software is the group, not the individual.

I think we've all been to meetings where everyone had a really good time, we're all talking to one another and telling jokes and laughing, and it was a great meeting, except we got nothing done. Everyone was amusing themselves so much that the group's goal was defeated by the individual interventions.

The user of social software is the group, and ease of use should be for the group. If the ease of use is only calculated from the user's point of view, it will be difficult to defend the group from the "group is its own worst enemy" style attacks from within.

4.) And, finally, you have to find a way to spare the group from scale. Scale alone kills conversations, because conversations require dense two-way conversations. In conversational contexts, Metcalfe's law is a drag. The fact that the amount of two-way connections you have to support goes up with the square of the users means that the density of conversation falls off very fast as the system scales even a little bit. You have to have some way to let users hang onto the less is more pattern, in order to keep associated with one another.

This is an inverse value to scale question. Think about your Rolodex. A thousand contacts, maybe 150 people you can call friends, 30 people you can call close friends, two or three people you'd donate a kidney to. The value is inverse to the size of the group. And you have to find some way to protect the group within the context of those effects.

Sometimes you can do soft forking. Live Journal does the best soft forking of any software I've ever seen, where the concepts of "you" and "your group" are pretty much intertwingled. The average size of a Live Journal group is about a dozen people. And the median size is around five.

But each user is a little bit connected to other such clusters, through their friends, and so while the clusters are real, they're not completely bounded -- there's a soft overlap which means that though most users participate in small groups, most of the half-million LiveJournal users are connected to one another through some short chain.

IRC channels and mailing lists are self-moderating with scale, because as the signal to noise ratio gets worse, people start to drop off, until it gets better, so people join, and so it gets worse. You get these sort of oscillating patterns. But it's self-correcting.

And then my favorite pattern is from MetaFilter, which is: When we start seeing effects of scale, we shut off the new user page. "Someone mentions us in the press and how great we are? Bye!" That's a way of raising the bar, that's creating a threshold of participation. And anyone who bookmarks that page and says "You know, I really want to be in there; maybe I'll go back later," that's the kind of user MeFi wants to have.

You have to find some way to protect your own users from scale. This doesn't mean the scale of the whole system can't grow. But you can't try to make the system large by taking individual conversations and blowing them up like a balloon; human interaction, many to many interaction, doesn't blow up like a balloon. It either dissipates, or turns into broadcast, or collapses. So plan for dealing with scale in advance, because it's going to happen anyway.

Conclusion

Now, those four things are of course necessary but not sufficient conditions. I propose them more as a platform for building the interesting differences off. There are lots and lots and lots of other effects that make different bits of software interesting enough that you would want to keep more than one kind of pattern around. But those are commonalities I'm seeing across a range of social software for large and long-lived groups.

In addition, you can do all sorts of things with explicit clustering, whether it's guilds in massively multi-player games, or communities on Live Journal or what have you. You can do things with conversational artifacts, where the group participation leaves behind some record. The Wikipedia right now, the group collaborated online encyclopedia is the most interesting conversational artifact I know of, where product is a result of process. Rather than "We're specifically going to get together and create this presentation" it's just "What's left is a record of what we said."

There are all these things, and of course they differ platform to platform. But there is this, I believe, common core of things that will happen whether you plan for them or not, and things you should plan for, that I think are invariant across large communal software.

Writing social software is hard. And, as I said, the act of writing social software is more like the work of an economist or a political scientist. And the act of hosting social software, the relationship of someone who hosts it is more like a relationship of landlords to tenants than owners to boxes in a warehouse.

The people using your software, even if you own it and pay for it, have rights and will behave as if they have rights. And if you abrogate those rights, you'll hear about it very quickly.

That's part of the problem that the John Hegel theory of community -- community leads to content, which leads to commerce -- never worked. Because lo and behold, no matter who came onto the Clairol chat boards, they sometimes wanted to talk about things that weren't Clairol products.

"But we paid for this! This is the Clairol site!" Doesn't matter. The users are there for one another. They may be there on hardware and software paid for by you, but the users are there for one another.

The patterns here, I am suggesting, both the things to accept and the things to design for, are givens. Assume these as a kind of social platform, and then you can start going out and building on top of that the interesting stuff that I think is going to be the real result of this period of experimentation with social software.

Thank you very much.

El Tomboto, Monday, 3 September 2007 19:33 (eighteen years ago)

nabisco otm

Curt1s Stephens, Monday, 3 September 2007 19:44 (eighteen years ago)

no Oink Administrator, no fuckability

Oink Administrator, Monday, 3 September 2007 19:49 (eighteen years ago)

LOL Curt1s.

Trayce, Monday, 3 September 2007 21:44 (eighteen years ago)

I voted for someone who got a single vote but I'm not telling who!

ENBB, Monday, 3 September 2007 22:47 (eighteen years ago)

I would fuk a female version of me. And sadly, I might even rape her.

CaptainLorax, Monday, 3 September 2007 22:50 (eighteen years ago)

xpost: i shall guess at ILE's resident Dubliner and Scrabulous whinger...

Just got offed, Monday, 3 September 2007 22:50 (eighteen years ago)

Nope!

ENBB, Monday, 3 September 2007 23:09 (eighteen years ago)

So did I E, and neither am I!

Trayce, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 00:26 (eighteen years ago)

I didn't get a single vote

RJG, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 00:42 (eighteen years ago)

I voted for Trayce, and it wasn't meant to be neither creepy nor jokey. Just one more click on one more poll that took maybe 30 seconds of my time.

Tuomas, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 10:57 (eighteen years ago)

OK well thats 2 ppl I can vouch for then! ;P

Trayce, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 10:58 (eighteen years ago)

Don't blame me, I voted for hstencil!

(That would make a great t-shirt.)

Masonic Boom, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 10:59 (eighteen years ago)

I voted for "ilx system", it seemed the safest bet.

Pashmina, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 11:07 (eighteen years ago)

but then if you only had 1 vote wouldn't that look worse than not voting and getting 0?

-- blueski, Monday, 3 September 2007 15:31 (Monday, 3 September 2007 15:31)

No. I love myself and am happy for the world to know.

xpost: i shall guess at ILE's resident Dubliner and Scrabulous whinger...

-- Just got offed, Monday, 3 September 2007 23:50 (Monday, 3 September 2007 23:50)

Give it up man, you cheated. Now why don't you let it go eh? I have voted for myself. It was the honest answer to who, out of that list, I would fuk. As for you, perhaps you and Dom need to find out who the third voter was? Could be trouble in paradise...

PS. it was not me before that whole joke starts.

kv_nol, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 11:31 (eighteen years ago)

FFS why don't YOU let it go; I have no case to answer because it's BUILT INTO the Scrabulous programming that you CAN'T force a win if it's YOUR go.

Besides, Heave Ho has alread laid claim to one of my votes. As for whom I voted for...

...well, someone's put it better than I ever could. (Of course it wasn't for me; why waste a vote? I have far too much pride.)

Just got offed, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 11:54 (eighteen years ago)

"I have far too much pride"

There are so many jpgs & quotes & zings here that I can't even pick one.

onimo, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 11:56 (eighteen years ago)

Perhaps because you brought it up? It was your go. I had been waiting days for you to take your turn (which you admitted). Unless you quickly took your go and before I knew that it was mine, you managed to force the game.

"Far too much pride"? Your behaviour over the past year on ILX hasn't been included in your self-appraisal I hope. (xpost)

kv_nol, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:01 (eighteen years ago)

fuk

RJG, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:03 (eighteen years ago)

dude it is just the internet, it'll take more than jpgs & quotes & zings to turn me into a gibbering mess with no self-esteem.

xpost: I did NOT admit it was my go, now you're twisting my words. You seem to have absolutely no grasp of how such things work, and the laughable impossibility of the 'crafty sheme' you so describe. I could only have forced the game if (as happened; I actually noticed your reticence to reply) you hadn't played in a week. FINITO.

Just got offed, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:05 (eighteen years ago)

*sits back and eats popcorn*

nathalie, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:09 (eighteen years ago)

i am loving how this scrab beef keeps rolling

blueski, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:10 (eighteen years ago)

Don't bother Nath. Louis, grow up & learn to let go. I am done and you are badly mistaken (read: lying). For an inconsequential game this is requiring far more effort than it ever deserved! You were winning, you forced the win without waiting out the match, fine. As to slow play, see the scrabulous thread, I uninstalled because I felt bad keeping people waiting.

dude it is just the internet, it'll take more than jpgs & quotes & zings to turn me into a gibbering mess with no self-esteem.

Googling mums?

Blueski, give it a rest yeah?

kv_nol, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:13 (eighteen years ago)

has it come to this?

RJG, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:14 (eighteen years ago)

Can I have some of your popcorn, Nath? Salt or toffee? Mmmm... ACK! I hate it when the bits get stuck in my teeth.

Masonic Boom, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:16 (eighteen years ago)

Oh please do! I picked an XL large bucket and it seems the show's already over. Poo. :-)

nathalie, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:17 (eighteen years ago)

Googling mums?

gibbering mess, granted, low self esteem, no way. temporarily decimated at the most. :p

my final word on scrabulous issue is that OF COURSE i wanted to finish the game, because i was doing so well! thing is, i thought you'd retired from playing, and i was getting cranky waiting for you to play your piece, AND i saw you say you were gonna stop playing on the Scrabulous thread, so i decided to at least get the small consolation of a forced win.

Just got offed, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:17 (eighteen years ago)

Dude, get a room. ;-)

nathalie, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:22 (eighteen years ago)

who would u fuk over?

blueski, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:24 (eighteen years ago)

But it WASN'T MY TURN! Seriously. There was no indication for days that you had taken your turn. I know this because I had only 3 games (including yours) on the go.

That said, I can understand the desire for a consolation win. You took my smack talk in good form on the scrabulous thread so cheers for that anyway.

kv_nol, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:25 (eighteen years ago)

LESS SCRABBLE!!! MORE FUKKING!!!

I AM SECOND MOST FUKKABLE HUMAN ON ILX, YOU HAVE TO DO WHAT I SAY!!!

Now for some more of that popcorn, yum.

Masonic Boom, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:28 (eighteen years ago)

http://i1.tinypic.com/5x4wzuf.gif

StanM, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:33 (eighteen years ago)

i have come round to idea of axing polls, but ONLY because they don't show who voted what or allow mulitple votes per user.

blueski, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:36 (eighteen years ago)

still can't believe there's no "who won't u fuk" thread yet. much better idea.

ken c, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:38 (eighteen years ago)

xxxpost scrabble leads to fukking, everybody knows that.

ken c, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:39 (eighteen years ago)

would this thread be better or worse if everyone knew who voted what?

kenan, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:39 (eighteen years ago)

so much worse

blueski, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:40 (eighteen years ago)

but TRUTH = BEAUTY

blueski, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:40 (eighteen years ago)

Disappointed about ken c's poor showing

Tom D., Tuesday, 4 September 2007 12:41 (eighteen years ago)

me too :(

ken c, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 13:23 (eighteen years ago)

at least i got voted by the one i most like to fuk though. REQUITED LOVE.

ken c, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 13:24 (eighteen years ago)

requited fuk

ken c, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 13:26 (eighteen years ago)

well that's creepy

ghost rider, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 13:47 (eighteen years ago)

wait i'm not ghost rider, i'm ally. i fail at the internet.

ghost rider, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 13:47 (eighteen years ago)

This whole thread is crepey and kind of sad. Listing who voted for who would exponentially increase the crepey factor. Without that, I can assume that people were doing favors for their buds or joking.
Except for System. It deserved every single vote it got.

The never ending Scrabble beef is truly brilliant. Nobody beef with me b/c I'm slow. Trying to work more over here. (Although I won't beef with you if I get so slow that you must force a game.)

Ms Misery, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 13:53 (eighteen years ago)

This whole thread is crepey and kind of sad.

Not if you know it's a joke. But... maybe not everybody does. :(

kenan, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 13:54 (eighteen years ago)

I would be a little ooged out if I were Ally, that is true.

kenan, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 13:55 (eighteen years ago)

Not if you know it's a joke. But... maybe not everybody does. :(

Well I look at it as so but some posts make me wonder if everyone does.

Ally's taken these kind of hits for awhile. I'm just glad for Luna that she wasn't a top poster when this poll for was made.

Ms Misery, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 14:08 (eighteen years ago)

I don't think anyone is taking anything seriously here. Or do they?

StanM, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 14:14 (eighteen years ago)

I'm taking this totally seriously. I'm completely offended that 1 more person would rather fuk a database than fuk me. And I'm a DB analyst!

/\ this is a joke BTW. As far as the ILX creepometer goes, this thread is about .00000001 of a volt. It did amuse me, though, considering the amount of cheap namecalling that gets thrown at me in some parts around here, to show so high - I was expecting to be one of the 0's.

But seriously, if this thread bugs anyone for more than half a second, you need to get out more. It's so clearly a joke.

Masonic Boom, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 14:18 (eighteen years ago)

I don't think anyone is taking anything seriously here. Or do they?

You never know what evil lurks in the hearts of ILx0rs.

Ms Misery, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 14:22 (eighteen years ago)

Hearts? They have HEARTS?

nathalie, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 14:26 (eighteen years ago)

It's not much of a joke to vote for person you want to sex, is it?

Unless you vote jokingly, which many, but surely not all, did.

I didn't vote.

Considering the actual number of votes I think the margin of victory IS totally weird, but it's complicated.

People with several votes but I can't recall ever seeing a photo of them on ILX seems strange.

blueski, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 14:43 (eighteen years ago)

ILX System is WDYLL shy.

Ms Misery, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 14:44 (eighteen years ago)

I have a photo of ILX System. He sent it to me over chat one late night.

http://globalnerdy.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/hal-9000.jpg

hubba hubba.

kenan, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 14:48 (eighteen years ago)

i know what very few ilxors look like, not even ally. i didn't vote.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 14:50 (eighteen years ago)

ilx woman and ilx man, yesterday
http://www.hotmoviequotes.com/images/gallery/knocked-up_450x328.jpg

blueski, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 14:59 (eighteen years ago)

one year passes...

ilx system is kinda sexy

velko, Friday, 14 November 2008 08:34 (seventeen years ago)

I prefer ilx systern

o_O (ken c), Friday, 14 November 2008 10:55 (seventeen years ago)

I'm sad on two counts; 1, no one voted for Ned, and 2, I didn't even get nominated.

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 14 November 2008 10:59 (seventeen years ago)

and you voted for doglatin's sister

o_O (ken c), Friday, 14 November 2008 11:00 (seventeen years ago)

it's all just politics anyway

Ant Attack.. (Ste), Friday, 14 November 2008 11:01 (seventeen years ago)

Louis is DL's sister?

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 14 November 2008 11:04 (seventeen years ago)

yes you've been whacking off to louis's alterego all this time.

o_O (ken c), Friday, 14 November 2008 11:08 (seventeen years ago)

and what 1

who the fuck is this

some dude'n'em (and what), Friday, 14 November 2008 13:46 (seventeen years ago)

Been a bit dry lately?

Sick Mouthy (Scik Mouthy), Friday, 14 November 2008 13:48 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.