Commences now.
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:01 (eighteen years ago)
Socks is high: this girl doesn't exactly look amazing in general, but the choice of gray socks is ... clever.
http://bp0.blogger.com/_v7ll7o_zYLE/RqpH_RvLiOI/AAAAAAAAACw/1c8URaJ7UcI/s400/haarlemmerstraat.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:02 (eighteen years ago)
What are those two things on his scarf??
http://www.oslostil.com/diaryphotos/152.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)
Gray socks strike again (why because they look etc.)
http://mattancey.free.fr/minimi/paris/138.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:08 (eighteen years ago)
"Did you just call me a yuppie? Thanks, that's kind of the look I was working on!"
http://mattancey.free.fr/minimi/paris/118.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:11 (eighteen years ago)
don't forget
http://www.streetpeeper.com/
― lauren, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:18 (eighteen years ago)
Picturing this man on a fashion blog is like announcing that you hate everything there is to hate about legs.
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1340/1250290023_3d53f5ec85.jpg?v=0
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:18 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.youcatwalk.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/152_pontus.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:23 (eighteen years ago)
Man, if I were wearing a collar that great, I would so not distract from it with those boots.
http://www.youcatwalk.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/125_anna.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:26 (eighteen years ago)
ipod headphones?
(was that rhetorical?)
― max, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:26 (eighteen years ago)
No, I really couldn't tell! That makes perfect sense, though.
nabisco is not as good at fashion crit as the Tracer Hand is.
― Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:27 (eighteen years ago)
now do some don'ts nabisco
― Wrinklepaws, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:28 (eighteen years ago)
Tracer Hand aka Leatherpants McGee
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:29 (eighteen years ago)
Are you trying to create ILX's own Vice?
I love that girl's bag up there.
― Ms Misery, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:31 (eighteen years ago)
This is not do's + don'ts, this is poking around various blogs and discussing (with myself, evidently)!
Recommend justglitterlust.blogspot.com for peek into fashions of Tallinn, Estonia.
P.S. Anyone remember my timeline of the 00s where I predicted "skank saturation" and "skank backlash?" Can we consider this "skank backlash?"
http://bp3.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/Rtacqv4lLVI/AAAAAAAAB98/DQzkZ5xlJw8/s400/Wrapped.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)
dude in the brown members only jacket looked like he stepped off the film set of Barcelona.
― molly mummenschanz, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:33 (eighteen years ago)
There were a ton of mannequins at Macy's this past weekend donning the gray knee high sock look.
― KitCat, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:34 (eighteen years ago)
Cuz he kinda looks like Chris Eigmann!
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:35 (eighteen years ago)
he does!
― horseshoe, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:35 (eighteen years ago)
Maroon sweater man looks like Jack McBrayer.
― KitCat, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:39 (eighteen years ago)
I love maroon sweater man.
― horseshoe, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:40 (eighteen years ago)
Someone needs to photoshop Maroon Cardigan so he's stepping off a plane onto a pre-statehood Hawaiian island.
There are at least three other guys in Stockholm who look basically like that -- one looked even better, due to shoe/shirt coordination -- but I skipped along.
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)
Hello, Estonia!
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1278/1313653222_ae44a7430c.jpg?v=0
― molly mummenschanz, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)
Note, re: Maroon Cardigan: two bags!
One is a portfolio, Nabisco. For his art.
― Laurel, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)
that woman is beautiful but clearly insane.
― horseshoe, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:43 (eighteen years ago)
her cheekbones are delicious.
her yellow bow, however, is not.
― molly mummenschanz, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:44 (eighteen years ago)
I love the yellow bow, but not with psychedelic purple leggings so much.
― horseshoe, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:44 (eighteen years ago)
Haha I might think she were terrific fun if we met! But to me, that isn't fashion. She's a mess.
― Laurel, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:45 (eighteen years ago)
bow over that hole in the dress doesn't do much for me. what is even going on there?
― molly mummenschanz, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:45 (eighteen years ago)
i've seen gray socks chick with librarian glasses at least three times on different fashion blogs - some kind of uncanny talent of casually running into street photographers?
― Roz, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:45 (eighteen years ago)
Maybe that woman could hook up with this fellow Tallinner:
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1169/1160233617_6b42c4ea10.jpg?v=0
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:46 (eighteen years ago)
xpost - probably a model, Roz!
WAHT IS GOING ON WITH HIS JEANS?!
― molly mummenschanz, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:47 (eighteen years ago)
The redhead w/ grey socks is so beautiful up above that she's physically hurting me...but the babyish stoop and the teal satin heels worn like Mama's dress up are making me want to slap her. You're going to force me to post snappy jpgs of my own in self-defense, aren't you.
xp ahahahahahahahha
― Laurel, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:47 (eighteen years ago)
Who here would have the joie de vivre to wear this?
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1227/531237454_d919ee8692.jpg?v=0
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:48 (eighteen years ago)
I covet her shoes (beautiful redhead w/ gray socks + adolescent posture)
― horseshoe, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)
Good lord. I'm trying to find something positive to say about the purple faux bag lady but I am failing miserably. She's pretty. But damn, those clothes. You can't even say she raided her gran's closet, because, well, I doubt even in gran's time those clothes were fashionable. Her boobs look larger than they are because of the mix(up) and those leggings make my migraine attack explode in a million headaches.
― stevienixed, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)
Hey I know! She's a hooker and you can only practice safe sex by putting your penis through the hole!
― stevienixed, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:50 (eighteen years ago)
contraceptive yellow bow? I'd buy that.
― Roz, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)
The thing about the purple dress girl is that I think if you weren't nice to her, she'd slap you and sweep all the drinks off your table with one arm. That's what her look is saying to me.
― Laurel, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:52 (eighteen years ago)
HA! Me too.
― KitCat, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:52 (eighteen years ago)
This would be so great, but the slim/shrunken jacket pulls at his shoulders in a way that winds up looking Frankensteinish -- apparently this is the one man in the world who is too tall for fashion?
http://bp3.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/RtLMMv4lLII/AAAAAAAAB8U/jfsz25AJyEk/s400/GQParis3.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:53 (eighteen years ago)
Oxbloods w/ red socks = WIN / WIN
― Laurel, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:53 (eighteen years ago)
But yeah, DNW wrists sticking out like chicken legs.
― Laurel, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)
This looks great in a fashion blog photo, but if you were actually watching this guy walk toward you, you would absolutely think "WTF is he trying to do with those pants?"
http://bp1.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/Rs2Dhf4lK7I/AAAAAAAAB6s/VM4uO6t2-lk/s400/MadPlaid.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:55 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, no. That guy is a perfect example of why people think clothes look good when PEOPLE look good. He's hot, okay? And again, red socks win. But overall...no.
― Laurel, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)
i don't know why i hate the kneesocks and heels thing so much. to do the innocent/sexy knee socks thing you gotta do little girl shoes. the combo does not compute. it screams slutty halloween costume.
― bell_labs, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)
I think I hate the kneesocks and heels thing because I love heels. I just imagine the socks bunching around the ankle and uglying everything up.
― horseshoe, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:58 (eighteen years ago)
Bell, I'm having the same problem, but feeling like I am just the grinch for thinking so. I rreeeally hate it. And it always goes with the WORST posture.
― Laurel, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:59 (eighteen years ago)
i can't really speak on the posture thing. when i see people wearing that, i assume they are just from LA.
― bell_labs, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:01 (eighteen years ago)
the first girl with the white shoes is doing it right, i think. there is just a point where it stops being cute and starts looking like cosplay.
― bell_labs, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:03 (eighteen years ago)
I like that high-waisted jeans are on the fashion comeback, but what exactly has gone wrong with this pair?
http://www.fashionhunter.net/wp-content/2007/02/jeans-vita-alta.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:04 (eighteen years ago)
Answer:
http://www.fashionhunter.net/wp-content/2007/02/monday.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:05 (eighteen years ago)
well the rise is all wrong.
― horseshoe, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:06 (eighteen years ago)
I hate those jeans with a passion.
― KitCat, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:08 (eighteen years ago)
Sartorialist will take a picture of any dude wearing a scarf, it cracks me up.
Those jeans are baffling. The higher-waist trend is nice, though: it means people will finally quit calling me Urkel for not always showing asscrack.
― Abbott, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:10 (eighteen years ago)
agggghhh no. I don't like super-low jeans either, but high-waisted jeans are the work of satan. talk about completely shortening your torso!
― Roz, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:11 (eighteen years ago)
is this going to turn into an superfuturistic WAYWT thread? uhhhh
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)
people who shell out deep piles of cash so as to look like a designer scumbag are beyond me. "street style."
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)
you can do it with heels, just a different type of heel than the idiot in the teal shoes is doing them with.
― the schef (adam schefter ha ha), Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)
I like to wear pants around my waist proper, ie around my bellybutton. I am not all about wearing humpty-dumpty style high-waisted ones like above.
xp
― Abbott, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:15 (eighteen years ago)
p.s. -- destroy all sneakerheads (except well-beloved ilxor sleep)
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:15 (eighteen years ago)
i love high-waisted pants/skirts, but the rise on that pair that nabisco posted is just baffling.
― lauren, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:16 (eighteen years ago)
The problem with those jeans is that they aren't high-waisted jeans -- they're low-rise jeans with an extra tube of material tacked on the top! Nice high-waisted trousers would have hips to them. (Or even pleats, in that early-90s high-waist style -- which I feel like I've been seeing here and there lately.)
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:17 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp1.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/RoNwRp7-NQI/AAAAAAAABeM/1Jfy8ks-tZk/s400/MarniW1.jpg
I love these shoes.
― horseshoe, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)
^^^ I have this exact same members only jacket :\ popped collar is never ok, tho
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:25 (eighteen years ago)
i think this is my problem w/ the sartorialist. guy is too humorless to just say "i took a photo of this guy 'cos i fancied him". on the other hand i do kinda like this guys outfit, just if the pants were rolled up more beatly it would rock. good to see stuff from other blogs so give me links if you have them!
― jed_, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:40 (eighteen years ago)
beatly = neatly.
Check the sidebar at facehunter.blogspot.com for a list of blogs, by city -- I just wish they'd clean up a little, cause half of them are like "I wanna do a street fashion blog for Cleveland!" and then two weeks later it's just ZZZZZZZ
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:49 (eighteen years ago)
http://ventnorblog.com/copy_images/skating-priest.jpg
― gabbneb, Thursday, 6 September 2007 21:57 (eighteen years ago)
English cool-kid style irks me for reasons I can't pin down -- it always feels too music-based to me, maybe? It's all stuff Kate would probably go for, though:
http://bp3.blogger.com/_3lEWkRDQ96E/Ro61XrX1GnI/AAAAAAAABnY/WaBeCdqbA2o/s400/red.jpg http://bp1.blogger.com/_3lEWkRDQ96E/RowT-rX1GlI/AAAAAAAABnI/q4qc_avWIk0/s400/mod.jpg
Except for this girl, whose bag is probably full of Wodehouse:
http://bp2.blogger.com/_3lEWkRDQ96E/RolsrrX1GkI/AAAAAAAABnA/9ckewRgArpU/s400/cabaret.jpg
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 01:00 (eighteen years ago)
Haha, that first kid looks like he stole my mom's maternity shirt she wore through all five pregnancies.
― Abbott, Friday, 7 September 2007 01:03 (eighteen years ago)
Barcelona -- this is one of those outfits that require you to be really cute: http://bp1.blogger.com/_jBtRq4fSBKc/RpFpk3gngcI/AAAAAAAAAFU/2gpxm6DFo3w/s400/iqan.jpg
Zurich -- this one benefits from Zowee Awesome Hair: http://playlust.net/blog/blogs/media/goodhairday_3.jpg
Zurich -- this jacket would come off great if it didn't make its wearer put on a douchey face: http://www.playlust.net/get_galeriebild_gross.php?id=136
(Playlust seems to experience grand confusion between "person wearing good clothes" and "person who is just good-looking, and you can't even see their clothes in the picture so WTF were you thinking.")
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 01:09 (eighteen years ago)
"Hi, I'm all rosy and Icelandic and have great legs, so I can pretty much just drape myself in anything bright and peachy and look awesome." http://bp0.blogger.com/_kqtCX8rtWOI/RtyIC0ijNwI/AAAAAAAABJU/aBvFkEnp_9c/s400/CIMG1387.JPG
"Oh, no Icelandic man would be caught DEAD without a Lower East Side metallic circle purse." http://bp2.blogger.com/_kqtCX8rtWOI/RtHdXEijNQI/AAAAAAAABFc/nYrxkR9Hpwg/s400/SNC12816.JPG
If you're looking for fashion that will never be a trend, you can't go wrong with the clip-on + hoodie combo: http://bp0.blogger.com/_kqtCX8rtWOI/RszXN0ijMuI/AAAAAAAABBM/ahLlZxD9Ozw/s320/CRW_9832.jpg
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 01:15 (eighteen years ago)
So i take it no one wants to discuss my fave blog, tweefashion.blogspot.com again.
u_u
― W4LTER, Friday, 7 September 2007 01:16 (eighteen years ago)
100% PRO (Lisbon): http://bp3.blogger.com/_Q2a9whQVWW8/RkES66SFRxI/AAAAAAAAAEI/unS8tmrMJGA/s400/dirceu.jpg
100% ANTI (Lisbon): http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/7268/4252/400/593412/Carlos%20e%20Ana%20Isabel.jpg
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 01:17 (eighteen years ago)
Holy crap, there's a TWEE FASHION BLOG? That wasn't made by me???
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 01:18 (eighteen years ago)
It's horrendous..
― W4LTER, Friday, 7 September 2007 01:20 (eighteen years ago)
..ly poorly updated.
― W4LTER, Friday, 7 September 2007 01:22 (eighteen years ago)
It's v. funny, it's kids in normal clothes who happen to be wearing scarves, and he talks about the background like it's an accessory: "a red blanket looks very good with a blu t shirt."
― Abbott, Friday, 7 September 2007 01:22 (eighteen years ago)
Tweeness! Note dude creating a viable two-state solution for sneakers and suspenders:
http://www.tapemix.org/a/175.jpg http://www.tapemix.org/a/145.jpg http://www.tapemix.org/a/212.jpg
I think the whole thing's summed up, though, when he says "it helps if you are cute" -- this is basically a "cute girls with glasses and sweaters" blog. The commentary is horrible! "My friends tell me this is called a deep V-neck sweater vest" -- like you couldn't just sort that out in your head?
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 01:24 (eighteen years ago)
The commentary totally makes it.
― Abbott, Friday, 7 September 2007 01:29 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.tapemix.org/a/180.jpg
when talking on the phone a white tshirt looks really good with a colorful blanket in the background
― humansuit, Friday, 7 September 2007 03:03 (eighteen years ago)
some people wear suspenders because they need them but you can also wear them just because they look good.
― humansuit, Friday, 7 September 2007 03:04 (eighteen years ago)
Ohhh the Fred Perry and braces. I drool. Man, when hipsters and tweedom give up the ghost, the suedeheads & Co. will still be rocking it.
― Laurel, Friday, 7 September 2007 03:09 (eighteen years ago)
some of us do not have a choice in this matter unless want to shop at the fred gwynn "tall man's" shiop
― strongohulkington, Friday, 7 September 2007 03:36 (eighteen years ago)
no mention of http://www.hel-looks.com/ yet? http://www.hel-looks.com/photos/20070825_04.jpg Johannes (25) "The corner stone of my style is the golden chain. I couldn't live without my sunglasses and my mullet. Suburbs are stylish. Making music inspires me."
― robotsinlove, Friday, 7 September 2007 05:59 (eighteen years ago)
the helsinki one is the best for sure! http://www.hel-looks.com/photos/20070614_01.jpg "Tonight my style is "Jack Daniels meets the sticks". My boyfriend bought this shirt but I monopolized it. You cannot wear a shirt like this without a bum bag.
― daria-g, Friday, 7 September 2007 06:17 (eighteen years ago)
^awesome.
― W4LTER, Friday, 7 September 2007 06:17 (eighteen years ago)
The problem; esp woth the girl in the XL jeans shirt and bum-bag,is that I remember a time when it first appeared on the scene. So I'm so not liking that outfit AT ALL. It could work if her thighs weren't so... uh... well, if they were slimmer. Those types of jeans only work when you have SUPERDOOPER straight legs. Sadly,she has my type of legs.
Is that 100%Anti guy carrying a LV bag? I don't care much for it. His shoes make his feet look like bunnies.
― stevienixed, Friday, 7 September 2007 06:39 (eighteen years ago)
Ha, I quoted that golden-chain guy on the "someone explain Finland" thread. Also the girl who says "I am like a hamster" and the guy whose style is inspired by He-Man, Pasolini, Wu-Tang, and Foucault.
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 07:24 (eighteen years ago)
From now on my style will be inspired by Styx, Jackee from 227, the Smurfs, and Lenin.
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 07:27 (eighteen years ago)
Zurich -- this one benefits from Zowee Awesome Hair:
The boots however fuck it up. :-(
I like the slightly slouchy knee length socks in pumps. Miu Miu did this. The socks however have to be very thin and also, the legs have to be thin as well. So? I could never pull it off. Or rather I would have to pull'em off.
http://www.japanesestreets.com/photos/data/media/171/70715-4112.jpg
I need to go back to Tokyo.
― stevienixed, Friday, 7 September 2007 07:32 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.hel-looks.com/photos/20070901_03.jpg
o, come on now.
― humansuit, Friday, 7 September 2007 07:37 (eighteen years ago)
His beard is hiding in shame.
― stevienixed, Friday, 7 September 2007 07:41 (eighteen years ago)
"Businesslike and decent styles inspire me. Like having a poor background and trying to show through your clothes that you are a good citizen.
He-Man, Pasolini and Wu-Tang Klan give me inspiration, too. Michel Foucault is my style idol. I like his aggressively intelligent and academic style."
!!!!
― humansuit, Friday, 7 September 2007 08:04 (eighteen years ago)
I want grey socks now. I feel like such a victim.
― Anna, Friday, 7 September 2007 09:41 (eighteen years ago)
i always wear grey socks. black socks repulse me, for some reason. hel-looks is my favourite.
― jed_, Friday, 7 September 2007 10:11 (eighteen years ago)
Last night there were about half a dozen art openings on the same street in E2. I learned, or was told:
The girls who made the biggest impact were a pair of perfectly time-capsuled a-la Doris Day Japanese art nerds with clear-resin but proper '50s hornrim librarian specs. Anna could rock all these dresses without appearing that nerdlike.
Mario Testino has death breath.
Peopole *still* talking about Isabella Blow - the Dame Edith Sitwell type above is totally channelling Issy. There are a lot of baby Blows knocking around the artier side of fashion; I think it's a forgiving look when orthodonture is an issue.
The grey knee-high socks thing is DIY Miu Miu a/w 07. If you want ones that stay up, Wolford is your friend but many also go the Westwood route. I will let you know how it goes with Mary Janes.
― suzy, Friday, 7 September 2007 11:20 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.tapemix.org/a/212.jpg
horrible.
― lauren, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:26 (eighteen years ago)
hot-rible, morelike
― Dom Passantino, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:27 (eighteen years ago)
Those trousers are not flattering at all, are they?
― nathalie, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:29 (eighteen years ago)
neither is the shirt, the cardigan, or the shapeless hair with half-assed barrett. the effect is beyond drab.
― lauren, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:30 (eighteen years ago)
Is she SEVEN? Jesus. I mean, I understand how those clothes are friendly and unthreatening, but an adult person should hardly make a habit out of looking powerless and forgettable on purpose. Unless he or she is deeply undercover.
― Laurel, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:34 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.youcatwalk.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/152_pontus.jpg This says, "I've never been mugged, but I think I might rather enjoy it!"
― Hurting 2, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:35 (eighteen years ago)
xp She must be a spy. For the...who still has spies?
― Laurel, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:38 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.tapemix.org/a/212.jpg This girl's uber-cuteness makes me want to do perverse things with her.
― Hurting 2, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:40 (eighteen years ago)
guys being predictably into the is-she-14-or-just-developmentally-disabled girl non-shocker
― bell_labs, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:49 (eighteen years ago)
I'm amazed - I'm with Lauren and Laurel and Bell on this one, she looks like all her clothes went up in a fire and she's had to borrow from her much shorter grrandmother. Her grandmother who believes that sex is dirty even if you're a married lady. Her grandmother who has a hopeless crush on the local vicar and bakes him good sensible cakes, but uses fancy doilies and then worries about seeming too forward. NO THIS GIRL IS NOT SEXY.
― Anna, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:50 (eighteen years ago)
yeah she def crosses the creepy line
so bored of everyone in london looking like this: http://streetpeeper.com/?p=1775
― r|t|c, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:51 (eighteen years ago)
altho i am wearing black cheap mondays right now as well :(
― r|t|c, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:52 (eighteen years ago)
I have a question: What is the MASCULINE style, for those who wish to emphasize their MACHISMO?
― n/a, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:52 (eighteen years ago)
no burgundy cardigans or wishy-washy scarves
― n/a, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:53 (eighteen years ago)
but let's keep it tasteful ok?
Yeah, non-poncey male fashions plz
― Hurting 2, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)
also fashions for AMERICANS (ie fatties)
― n/a, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:58 (eighteen years ago)
there may need to be another thread for this
sorry
I can't post a pic of those amazing Prada 2 tone footless knee highs because my computer is a mess.
― Yerac, Friday, 7 September 2007 14:59 (eighteen years ago)
sorry, I forgot what fashion is. Just ignore me.
― n/a, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:00 (eighteen years ago)
If she that mousy girl is serious about that outfit, she needs to rock a DIY hollowed-out Gideon Bible purse or something, just to push the envelope a bit. And/or a rosary.
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:00 (eighteen years ago)
man, i am so bad at proofreading my posts
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:02 (eighteen years ago)
"unsexy" / "dressed like grandmother" / "is she SEVEN" ==> IT IS A TWEE FASHION BLOG, PEOPLE, these points are a bit duh
Nick, I think my 100% pro guy from Lisbon is looking pretty butch!
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:02 (eighteen years ago)
I like her sweater. The rest of the outfit is dumb.
― n/a, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:03 (eighteen years ago)
Quien es mas macho? http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1162/832858175_1df8a84955.jpg?v=0 vs. http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1162/832858175_1df8a84955.jpg?v=0
― Hurting 2, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:03 (eighteen years ago)
Uh, I mean
vs.
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1294/1047002098_58a93f62c8.jpg?v=0
(y quien es el mas gordo Americano - pienso que es yo)
― Hurting 2, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:04 (eighteen years ago)
Alternately:
http://www.theonion.com/content/files/images/magazine_030606.article.jpg
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:04 (eighteen years ago)
masculine american fashion, huh? i dunno, every full-grown all-american male casually dresses the same from age 7 upward. maybe a good start would be to step away from the baseball caps and the cargo shorts and the sneakers.
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)
I do not wear baseball caps or cargo shorts.
― n/a, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)
sneakers are fashion, I have it on good authority
― n/a, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
there must be a third way
― Hurting 2, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
that is good. (i did not intend to imply you did.) xpost
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
You guys aren't ignoring me very well.
― n/a, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:09 (eighteen years ago)
http://streetpeeper.com/?p=1053
^^ haha i know this guy!! he combines this look with trying to chat like a proper teethkissin rudeboy. truly dreadful.
― r|t|c, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:11 (eighteen years ago)
Also: the main indispensable thing about Satorialist is that he's actually interested in men's fashion, rather than just shooting any cute or tall guy who seems to be trying to look cool. That and old men.
Manliness, March 2006:
http://bp1.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/RgrgmQAshsI/AAAAAAAAAuI/k50fSxe0fso/s400/Pittiscarf.jpg http://bp3.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/RgUjx-cdFCI/AAAAAAAAAoY/kJAHf_oZMak/s400/Baltwo.jpg http://bp1.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/RgJ_2OcdEuI/AAAAAAAAAl4/JR8bUpxbmwE/s400/SleeveLengthPort.jpg
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:11 (eighteen years ago)
New thread for side discussion: What is the MASCULINE style, for those who wish to emphasize their MACHISMO?
― n/a, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:11 (eighteen years ago)
3-image rule just cut out the bulk of the manliness :(
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:12 (eighteen years ago)
Come now, Nabisco, you submitted her photo for consideration, no one ever promised to "mind the twee" and sidestep the critital eye of FASHUN! There is tons and tons of "I raided my grandmother's closet ooh la la" fashun that is AWESOME, but it helps if yr grams was her taste from somwhere besides her tongue in the first place. And even if Grams DID have a crush on the vicar, it's your responsiblity to do better. Improve the genetic stock, give the next generation something to live up to!
xp Sartorialist is GENIUS for proper men's fashion...not so much for counter-culture hot BOYZ.
― Laurel, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:12 (eighteen years ago)
That first Sartorialist photo is OTM
― Hurting 2, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:16 (eighteen years ago)
I mean the first of those three Nabisco just posted
― Hurting 2, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:18 (eighteen years ago)
fucking cargo shorts
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:19 (eighteen years ago)
that was an xpost
i too love the sartorialist - he got me obsessed with finding bright magenta socks
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:21 (eighteen years ago)
yes. that tweed jacket man looks very... suave.
― bell_labs, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:21 (eighteen years ago)
I hate that guy.
― n/a, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:21 (eighteen years ago)
dear style bloggers,
you dont have to focus exclusively on people who are trying way too hard.
xo
― jhøshea, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)
jhoshea otm
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)
what fashion / style blogs are do you folks read besides the sartorialist & others mentioned upthread? i wanna inject some fashion into my google reader
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)
i reallly wish i had money/time to put into dressing up everyday. these people either don't have to be into an office at any particular time before noon, are students, or idle rich, and god bless them, but yeah. these types of blogs only make me feel like crap.
― bell_labs, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:29 (eighteen years ago)
this girl i would fuk tho
― jhøshea, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:29 (eighteen years ago)
I feel like S-list and the other blogs do better in the menswear, because it still has RULES, there's still a CODE that, if followed creatively, results in a truly impressive appearance. Women's fashion is so...up for grabs, re-invent the wheel, wear a tea-cozy over each breast and call it edgy...that ultimately appreciation of it is far more subjective.
― Laurel, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:30 (eighteen years ago)
someone linnk me to a blog celebrating hot commuters in frumpy office clothes pls
― bell_labs, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:33 (eighteen years ago)
― gabbneb, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:34 (eighteen years ago)
but who else are we going to look up to?
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:35 (eighteen years ago)
god i love street style blogs
― rrrobyn, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:38 (eighteen years ago)
are you saying this guy isn't completely rocking kashmir??
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4686/1648/400/PSMaroonsocks.jpg
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 7 September 2007 15:38 (eighteen years ago)
MANLY
This reminds me to go post 100,000 pictures of aging Teddy Boys on Nick's thread.
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 16:48 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp1.blogger.com/_3lEWkRDQ96E/RowT-rX1GlI/AAAAAAAABnI/q4qc_avWIk0/s400/mod.jpg
Dog Latin?!?!?!
― jaymc, Friday, 7 September 2007 16:50 (eighteen years ago)
― jaymc, Friday, 7 September 2007 16:51 (eighteen years ago)
That look is HORRIBLE. Is that belt a prostate cancer fundraiser item?
― Hurting 2, Friday, 7 September 2007 16:53 (eighteen years ago)
Also, I liked the girl all the girls hated.
― jaymc, Friday, 7 September 2007 16:55 (eighteen years ago)
I did finally buy a decent pair of trousers recently - I think Nabisco's previous posts might have subconsciously inspired me to do so.
― Hurting 2, Friday, 7 September 2007 16:57 (eighteen years ago)
youo know what i'm looking for? gray trousers, preferably made out of nice wool. doesn't that seem simple? IT'S NOT. i just want them to fit, and have no pleats. WHY IS THIS SO HARD.
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 7 September 2007 17:01 (eighteen years ago)
What kinds of shorts are acceptable?
― Kerm, Friday, 7 September 2007 17:02 (eighteen years ago)
Mine are dark gray and made out of (I guess?) nice wool. they do have a pleat but it's a pretty thin pleat and the cut of the trouser is nice enough that it doesn't smack you in the face with pleatedness.
― Hurting 2, Friday, 7 September 2007 17:03 (eighteen years ago)
well GOOD FOR YOU. DAMMIT.
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 7 September 2007 17:05 (eighteen years ago)
Tracer, haven't you been looking for grey wool trousers for like three years?
― Laurel, Friday, 7 September 2007 17:05 (eighteen years ago)
Get off yr ass, already.
yeah i go shopping for clothes about twice a year, max.
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 7 September 2007 17:16 (eighteen years ago)
I had a really great pair, but they were attacked and devoured by vicious moths. :(
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)
Wait, Tracer, are you looking for a thick wool, like winter pants, or lighter weight (possibly patterened)?
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 17:29 (eighteen years ago)
Cause this kind of thing (the latter) isn't that hard to find:
http://cdn.is.bluefly.com/mgen/Bluefly/prodImage.ms?productCode=2058713&width=300&height=300
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 17:31 (eighteen years ago)
TRACER HAND, APC. COME ON.
― suzy, Friday, 7 September 2007 17:59 (eighteen years ago)
does apc run true to size pretty much? i was about to buy some black trousers there.. waiting for them to get back to me on whether or not the inseam is too short on the pair i want
― daria-g, Friday, 7 September 2007 18:09 (eighteen years ago)
wait there is a street style kashmir blog???
― horseshoe, Friday, 7 September 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)
I can only speak for men's, but APC runs true to size for Norwegian elves.
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 18:30 (eighteen years ago)
Wealthy Norwegian elves.
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 18:31 (eighteen years ago)
APC runs european sized (aka "true-sized"), not american-style "vanity-sized".
― Steve Shasta, Friday, 7 September 2007 18:36 (eighteen years ago)
I've pretty much been told at APC that none of the pants are going to fit me. I have a 28-inch waist. Norwegian elves. Maybe once they get over skinny legs I'll drop by again.
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 18:41 (eighteen years ago)
they should carry 28, that's a pretty basic size albeit on the low end of the size scale. also try earnest cut & sew in meatpacking for nice wool trousers in fringe sizes.
― Steve Shasta, Friday, 7 September 2007 18:56 (eighteen years ago)
It is impossible to find any men's clothes that have smaller than a 34" waist here. It makes my boyfriend pissed the entire rest of the day after we go clothes shopping. He's written letters to store heads before out of fury.
― Abbott, Friday, 7 September 2007 18:58 (eighteen years ago)
yes, i'm aware it's european sized but different labels size differently according to who buys them.
it's done according to what size the typical customer is, and a range from that basically.. so american sizes are skewed not to appeal to vanity, but because the average customer for american clothes has gotten bigger so the range is not what it was
― daria-g, Friday, 7 September 2007 19:00 (eighteen years ago)
what do you mean by norwegian elves though? maybe i should take it as a sign the clothes will suit me, my background is scandinavian.. i'm worried the apc trousers will be too short
― daria-g, Friday, 7 September 2007 19:01 (eighteen years ago)
Steve, my point was that my 28/29-inch-waisted body was deemed TOO BIG to fit comfortably into any of their trousers.
Usually I have that opposite problem, yes: I needed a clean pair of khakis recently, and learned that Banana Republic doesn't carry anything under, like, 30 in actual stores.
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 20:30 (eighteen years ago)
I'm not certain of my waist size. I should probably be 32, 34 or something like that, but I believe I'm probably closer to 40. Great Tao, do I not want to actually have a 40 inch waist. Even for a guy just short of 6'4" that's getting into the 'lol fattey' zone.
― Oilyrags, Friday, 7 September 2007 20:34 (eighteen years ago)
Which brings up the question - not to be over-nosey, but how tall are you folks with 30 or smaller waists?
The men, I mean. I'm not really interested in shopping for lady clothes. Unless, you know, they're REALLY cute.
― Oilyrags, Friday, 7 September 2007 20:35 (eighteen years ago)
5'8
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 20:36 (eighteen years ago)
You probably eat healthy food and excercise regularly, too.
jerk
― Oilyrags, Friday, 7 September 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)
nabisco seems to be sort of, well, otm in that dept
― gabbneb, Friday, 7 September 2007 20:48 (eighteen years ago)
hahah
I gawk at Net-a-porter, Style.com and fashionologie.com. I also just ordered Dana Thomas' Deluxe. I still buy Vogue (US) tho for what reason I'm not sure. I guess I wanna be close to Wintour. ;-)
― stevienixed, Friday, 7 September 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)
I mostly eat Payday bars and mayonnaise, and I get tired climbing stairs. I just have a small waist, I think. I got big thighs instead. Plus, a year or two ago, I was in that rationalizing spot where you're like "maybe I'll buy a 34, you know, just for a baggy look, just for when I want to be really comfortable," and then something happened and I suddenly shrunk a bunch. Invisible tapeworm.
― nabisco, Friday, 7 September 2007 21:01 (eighteen years ago)
http://i.realone.com/assets/rn/img/0/8/3/4/13434380-13434382-large.jpg
― gabbneb, Saturday, 8 September 2007 01:13 (eighteen years ago)
oh dear
― daria-g, Saturday, 8 September 2007 01:31 (eighteen years ago)
i'm a 30" waist at the moment, and am 5'9" - am trying to put weight back on though. my jeans are all 32" waist, but they seem to give after a while and are all hella baggy now.
― stevie, Saturday, 8 September 2007 14:21 (eighteen years ago)
Xpost oh dear at andre leon, britney or kimora? god, (i repeat what i said on noiseboard): am i not sad for knowing all these people/names? :-(
― nathalie, Saturday, 8 September 2007 15:04 (eighteen years ago)
This might be stating the obvious, but I had a style epiphany looking at this guy on the subway last night. He was wearing very ordinary looking light khakis and an ordinary oxford blue shirt (not even an especially nice one), but he had really awesome black shoes with some kind of aligator-like pattern, a sharp-looking beige jacket, cool (though not necessarily expensive) rectangular glasses and a really nice woven hat with a feather. He looked amazing but it was all in a couple of right touches.
― Hurting 2, Saturday, 8 September 2007 15:19 (eighteen years ago)
cutie from here
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1391/1346295937_7671f72cf5_o.jpg
― lxy, Saturday, 8 September 2007 15:20 (eighteen years ago)
Does this mean that horrible new rave fashion is over? Never have I felt so alienated by a trend. Here's hopin' grandad chic is coming back in!
― I know, right?, Saturday, 8 September 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)
now available in top man, as seen by some twat in edinburgh who paired it with tight black jeans and white pointy shoes:
http://www.topman.com/wcsstore/TopMan//images/catalog/71Y12QWHT_large.jpg
― Tracer Hand, Saturday, 8 September 2007 16:16 (eighteen years ago)
thankx for the tipz gaiz
― Tracer Hand, Saturday, 8 September 2007 16:17 (eighteen years ago)
ugh, yeah, wtf you people. didnt you see lauren's post? go play around on Street Peeper. It's my street fashion website.
― phil-two, Monday, 10 September 2007 18:17 (eighteen years ago)
THERE CAN BE MORE THAN ONE
― nabisco, Monday, 10 September 2007 18:19 (eighteen years ago)
"I guess my style is a bit messy and slatternly." http://hel-looks.com/photos/20070905_01.jpg
― nabisco, Monday, 10 September 2007 18:21 (eighteen years ago)
"clean homeless"
― jhøshea, Monday, 10 September 2007 18:22 (eighteen years ago)
my best friend made the Men's Vogue fashion blog:
This guy is kind of half preppy (plaid shirt, boat shoes), half street (messenger bag, rolled jeans, graffiti). I like his undefinability. Brooklyn, NY, August 2007.
http://mensvogue.typepad.com/clothing__in_her_eyes/images/2007/09/05/bl_brooks_cowboy13.jpg
yes! i love the way the graffiti you are standing near contributes to your look's undefinability!
― gr8080, Sunday, 16 September 2007 14:02 (eighteen years ago)
haha but it is a good look! the writer is right in the article re: robert redford pwning this look - hot (xpost with thread abt masculine machismo etc style)
― rrrobyn, Sunday, 16 September 2007 14:37 (eighteen years ago)
i'm going to start a street-style blog about things that require one to be totally hot (not nec conventionally but y'know generally hotness) in order to wear e.g. http://bp0.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/RuQQ7vKQa9I/AAAAAAAADW0/-ry9aF-RVKU/s400/R0088890.jpg
― rrrobyn, Sunday, 16 September 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
omg it is a young beth parker! crazy! http://bp1.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/RuQQ7_KQa_I/AAAAAAAADXE/PJknOyVtZqY/s400/R0088863.jpg
― rrrobyn, Sunday, 16 September 2007 15:10 (eighteen years ago)
whahey phil, that's a great site! nice job!
― Tracer Hand, Sunday, 16 September 2007 15:31 (eighteen years ago)
collarless shirts - classic or nay? i just received a linen one as a gift and i was dubious. i still don't like it on its own, but underneath a jacket i think it looks pretty sharp.
― Tracer Hand, Sunday, 16 September 2007 15:32 (eighteen years ago)
i think collarless goes well in linen - as long as it's not to blousy? i've seen it look really good!
― rrrobyn, Sunday, 16 September 2007 15:48 (eighteen years ago)
http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c287/expatrica/Jyri.jpg
Please confirm that the sex of the above individual is male. At first glance I thought female but I think I've changed my mind. Jyri is very confusing.
I almost just sent this lovely pic as an attachment to my boss and five other senior colleagues. It seems I can't read while walking or browse ILX while emailing. I'm a non-multitaking pussy too.
― ENBB, Monday, 17 September 2007 18:50 (eighteen years ago)
People in Finland + wanting to dress like Japanese kids =
http://hel-looks.com/photos/20070915_02.jpg
― nabisco, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 18:41 (eighteen years ago)
ENBB -
I cannot be certain, but the hips to shoulder ratio does suggest skinny boy rather than skinny girl. Compare with the skinny girl that Nabis just posted.
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 18:43 (eighteen years ago)
The ragdoll is horrifying.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 18:44 (eighteen years ago)
Do all finns have horizontally striped legs?
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 18:46 (eighteen years ago)
I think she's terrific! She's found the perfect look to turn her long face into a great big plus.
― nabisco, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 18:47 (eighteen years ago)
I mean, if you were that tall and lanky and had that long of a face, how would you dress? (And would it suit you as well as that suits her?)
― nabisco, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 18:48 (eighteen years ago)
There are an infinite number of style options that aren't Raggedy Ann meets Heidi porn, Nabisco, and plenty of lanky people choose them every day. Some of them are even good.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 18:50 (eighteen years ago)
anyone who still thinks a plaid western shirt is still 'preppy' needs to get out more
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 18:51 (eighteen years ago)
i mean, lanky with longish face = every model ever!
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 18:52 (eighteen years ago)
If you must make everyone in the world look alike, feel free to try -- but I, for one, encourage Helsinki high-school students to dress up like Heidi all they want. (She made that herself, incidentally.)
It's weird, because Hel Looks is the one non-Japanese blog I've seen that has kids dressing up in Japanese lolita / decora-chan / J-rock styles. (And they all say "oh, we're really into Japanese styles" -- judging by Hel Looks, it's either that or Hanoi Rocks up there).
― nabisco, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 18:53 (eighteen years ago)
her face is not so long as her chin is weak. there is a difference.
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 18:55 (eighteen years ago)
i don't think it's particularly long or weak but that she is just dwarfed by that ridiculous turtleneck!
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 18:56 (eighteen years ago)
i mean, she probably is pretty hot but is obscured by all the ruffles and bows and stripey bullshit
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 18:58 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, she has the kind of weak chin that leaves someone looking goony / goofy / friendly (Reason to Dress Up Like Heidi #89123)
― nabisco, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 18:58 (eighteen years ago)
Nabisco, I know this blog is for fashions that one likes, fair enough, and mostly it is your forum! Okay. But you like what you like, and I like what I like, and really both of us have pretty settled preferences. So please don't accuse me of trying to make everyone homogenous -- "twee" is not a whole spectrum, either.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:00 (eighteen years ago)
I think it's both a weak chin and long face but c'mon she looks about 13 let's cut her some slack. The whole ensemble is definitely a lot more . . . creative then anything I would have worn at that age and takes some serious confidence usually lacking in the early teen years.
― ENBB, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:00 (eighteen years ago)
She's sixteen, she likes J-lolita style, and she made that herself! She goes home from high school and makes awesome gangly-girl Heidi outfits that cheer the world, and the Shakey Mos of fashion crouch behind keyboards and complain :( :( :( :( :(
― nabisco, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:02 (eighteen years ago)
Also that girl is phenotypically basically the face of West Michigan. :D
― Laurel, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:02 (eighteen years ago)
i think this just does not look good on a tall person. tiny japanese girls can pull it off not because it is any less hideous but because there is just LESS of it. it's like putting a sailor outfit on a kitten.
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:02 (eighteen years ago)
That's true of a lot of the more cutsey stuff out there.
― ENBB, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:05 (eighteen years ago)
tiny japanese girls can pull it off not because it is any less hideous but because there is just LESS of it.
Less of what? Have you ever seen troupes of Japanese girls dressed like that? I have. I'm probably showing my age, but I reallu don't consider it fashion, really, just... well, FUGLY. Yes, I know, I hate fun. :-(
― stevienixed, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:08 (eighteen years ago)
I don't mean that tall girls oughtn't to wear anything whimsical, ever! And I like her sewing, of course! But dressing up as a cartoon character isn't fashion for life, you can't take it out into the world unless you want that to be the only thing you're known for, all the time. I suppose high school is the right time for cartoon characters if you must, though, it is true.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:12 (eighteen years ago)
i meant less per person - i'm sure i would run the other way if a troupe of nordic lolita heidis were coming down the street
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:15 (eighteen years ago)
fwiw i am totally dressed "street" today
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:25 (eighteen years ago)
The funny thing is that the whole thing I like about her is how she's way more subdued than the way Japanese teenagers would do this -- for starters, she's wearing two of the same shoes, and is not carrying a black parasol or anything.
What do you mean by dressing "street," Elmo?
― nabisco, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:26 (eighteen years ago)
tight jeans bright t-shirt utility belt high-tops
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:28 (eighteen years ago)
pale yellow esoteric-themed graphic print tee cyan & black buffalo-check flannel black belt w/ hot pink pyramid studs grey skinny low-rise jeans & zip-up combat boots with novelty black & white laces
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:29 (eighteen years ago)
ok i ruled at pretty much guessing that
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:30 (eighteen years ago)
I guess she's subdued compared to those J-lolitas. But who the fuck isn't compared to'em? Deep down I guess I'm exceptionally conservative about fashion. :-( I don't really get it. Which means I'm the perfect parent. *fastforwards 15 years* Ophelia has decided to dress like this. *EEEEK*
― stevienixed, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:30 (eighteen years ago)
:D
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:31 (eighteen years ago)
Then again, what's worse? That Heidi or the top pic? That girl is so washed out...
― stevienixed, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:31 (eighteen years ago)
xpost - Yeah but how is that "street?" That word still rings as hip-hop / "urban" / black to me, when used in this context ...
― nabisco, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:32 (eighteen years ago)
the term 'street' has pretty much become a cypher, i think, but as I've seen it used it's a 'style' that appropriates freely from hip-hop, skater, and working-class style
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:38 (eighteen years ago)
Huh: I feel like that might be an accidental etymological offshoot of having things like "street style" blogs! "A blog about the styles that people wear on the streets" ==> "a style like that often seen on street-style blogs."
― nabisco, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)
i mean, there are "streetwear" labels -- i'm not a designer fetishist so i'm not really up on them -- but companies like bape, supreme, alife, mishka, ice cream, etc. come to mind
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:45 (eighteen years ago)
I always wondered what Alife was. they have boring-ass plain black and white stickers plastered all over new york. never seen the clothes.
― dmr, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:49 (eighteen years ago)
i think it's a label? or a store? something
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:55 (eighteen years ago)
it's a store/label. on Rivington St.
― carne asada, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 19:58 (eighteen years ago)
i'm pretty tired of the pattern / graphic hoodie things, but some leroy jenkins stuff is pretty inventive & hilarious so gotta give some respect:
http://www.lionsden.la/bandaid/content/store/1/2119/LJ_ltblueA.jpg
http://www.lionsden.la/bandaid/content/store/1/2713/leroyjenkins_redA.jpg
http://www.lionsden.la/bandaid/content/store/1/2117/LJ_royalblueA.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)
florida grandma street!
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:14 (eighteen years ago)
So THAT'S where Laura Ashley's ghost went.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:15 (eighteen years ago)
if it were spring i'd be all over those cargo shorts, really
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:17 (eighteen years ago)
oh we know
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:20 (eighteen years ago)
hey what are you implying??
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:22 (eighteen years ago)
:)
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:24 (eighteen years ago)
if you mean that i am a sucker for bright colors & vistorian rose chintz, then you would be correct
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:30 (eighteen years ago)
baggy, elephant-like cargo shorts with sidepockets and drawstrings etc. please die already so i can buy a different kind of shorts kthx
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:34 (eighteen years ago)
even the shorts up there, brightly patterned with no pockets - still too baggy
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:35 (eighteen years ago)
Tracer, there was a big resurgence this summer in narrow, knee-length, nice-trousers shorts, some with a slight cuff at the bottom! I assumed they'd be easier to find in Europe and the UK than they are here, but maybe not.
― nabisco, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:38 (eighteen years ago)
yea, i definitely saw some slimmer cut shorts out there this summer, as well as skinny jean shorts, but it may take a while for the trend to snake its way down the retail ladder xpost
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:39 (eighteen years ago)
guys don't wear shorts in the UK unless they're trying to look american
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:40 (eighteen years ago)
wait, KNEE length? that's practically pants!
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:41 (eighteen years ago)
short pants! and then you put knee socks on and some sensible walking shoes! it is a style
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)
american apparel started making the OP style short corduroy shorts, which bums me out because i cant take as much pride in finding vintage pairs.
― gr8080, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 20:42 (eighteen years ago)
I bought a pair of those, and did not / do not regret it.
(There was a twinge of nostalgia involved for the grade-school summers I wore nothing but OP corduroy shorts and OP cabbie hats.)
― nabisco, Tuesday, 18 September 2007 21:05 (eighteen years ago)
I bought a red terrycloth headband for playing soccer (I hate face-sweat) but I enjoy wearing it so much I might just wear it out of the house for non-soccer-related activities one day. The fact that my hair is now getting into that feathery 80s tennis territory is... err... relevant, too. That may make it worse or better.
― Will M., Tuesday, 18 September 2007 22:29 (eighteen years ago)
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/09/12/style/tmagazine/16original-450.jpg
― Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 00:36 (eighteen years ago)
well that's a look
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 00:40 (eighteen years ago)
omg girl in yellow rrobyn posted is an acquantance of mine. She makes AWESOME drawings.
― Andi Mags, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 02:11 (eighteen years ago)
That guy wins the universe.
― The Reverend, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 03:40 (eighteen years ago)
Seriously. Who is he?! He's amazing.
― ENBB, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 03:42 (eighteen years ago)
He was in last Sunday's NYT Magazine (Men's Style) issue and he is the editor of some Japanese magazine.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/16/style/tmagazine/16originals.html?ref=tmagazine
― Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 19 September 2007 04:26 (eighteen years ago)
With Iran being all the rage right now, I'd like to take this opportunity to say how incredibly sexy I find it when Tehrani women wear designer headscarves:
http://www.polarisimages.com/Polaris-News/archives/11.jpg
― Hurting 2, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:02 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/08/18/tehran19806_narrowweb__300x416,0.jpg
― Hurting 2, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:03 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.persiancultures.com/iran-woman/iran_fashion/tehran-veil-police.jpg
― Hurting 2, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
veil crackdown = Ahmadinejad is teh gay
― Hurting 2, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:11 (eighteen years ago)
those sunglasses (in the first pic you posted) are so fugly.
i didn't notice my beloved miu miu pumps in the store anymore. :-( i can't buy'em now, bloated feet due to pregnancy, so i'll have to resort to... net-a-porter. bah. husband promised me a pair though. YAY!
― nathalie, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:11 (eighteen years ago)
yeah, on an American woman I would find them fugly. But something about the rebelliousness and flirting with the limits of the law is so HOTT
― Hurting 2, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:13 (eighteen years ago)
You're right. Also, it's probably because I can't see her, bound to be beautiful, eyes.
― nathalie, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:15 (eighteen years ago)
http://manolomen.com/images/Boy%20George%20with%20Jewish%20bling.jpg
karma karma karma karma karma chameleon shabbat shalom... shabbat sha-lo-o-o-om.
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:20 (eighteen years ago)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHahahaha
― Hurting 2, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:21 (eighteen years ago)
culture club ==> reggae ==> Rastafarianism ==> fake-Ethiopianism / fake-Judaism
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:24 (eighteen years ago)
PS I am seeing the gray knee socks all over NYC, but used in the absolute WORST you're-doing-it-wrong ways: when you've got them paired with like four-inch platforms and a tiny denim skirt and a t-shirt and cap, you just look like a stripper at a baseball game
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:25 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.hbo.com/thewire/img/episodeguide/season04/ep46_01.jpg
― Hurting 2, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:27 (eighteen years ago)
if those hats are coming back i am all in favor
― deej, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)
men's hats: fashion? i wish i could squeeze my oversized noggin into a snazzy hat, but I've never found any to fit my head and my style at once.
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:31 (eighteen years ago)
I have the same problem
― Hurting 2, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:31 (eighteen years ago)
I love porkpie hats. I'm all for it.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:31 (eighteen years ago)
those make me think of overweight ska musicians.
― lauren, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:34 (eighteen years ago)
Oh hm I kind of missed ska so I don't have that association. Sorry, L.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:36 (eighteen years ago)
The problem is that every time men's hats become a Thing, every dude in the world decides it will be totally awesome to wear a hat, and the whole thing gets really lame, and eventually you're sitting on the subway next to the classic role-playing geek in bad jeans and a fedora, and a dude in track pants and a wifebeater and a porkpie hat, and a fratboy in some kind of Urban Outfitters tweed Homburg, and some kid who's dressed like Pete Doherty, and it's just like ... I don't want anything to do with this anymore.
I have a nice black Stetson Homburg, but it makes me look like I can't decide whether I'm Amish or an Orthodox Jew (I have actually had two different people decide I must be Israeli because of it)
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:38 (eighteen years ago)
PS "every time men's hats become a Thing" = happened sometime in early summer and already bad, though I suspect the weather getting colder will suppress some guys' urges to go out in a jaunty lid
(dudes are also saying "lid" to sound cool)
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:39 (eighteen years ago)
Are those hats Fedoras? I'm not too on the up'n'up with this stuff alas? My gran was a hatmaker but I don't know the names. :-(
And, pray, what is wrong with that? Unless it's my daughter, I have no problem with that look. ;-)
― nathalie, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:39 (eighteen years ago)
You think you got problems? I never have a chance to wear my kente cloth kufi.
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:41 (eighteen years ago)
Nabisco, the only cure for oversaturation is to GO ON wearing your awesome hat through thick and thin, so that in the interim when hats are "out", you are the living embodiment of not-caring, and when they're back in again, you have the angle and the jaunt and the level of worn-ness just perfect while everyone else is trying to catch up.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:42 (eighteen years ago)
they are in??? i hate new york
― deej, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:45 (eighteen years ago)
It requires commitment, though, yes! Style is a LIFEstyle, maaaan.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)
one thing ive noticed abt this hat trend is that absolutely no can pull them off - they all look like theyre dressing up like grandpa.
― jhøshea, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)
except for nabisco who just looks amish
― jhøshea, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:48 (eighteen years ago)
I can without a hint of self-doubt say I look GREBT with a hat.
― nathalie, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:48 (eighteen years ago)
wtf, man, how you gonna give somebody the high hat if you ain't got no hat?
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)
That photo is from The Wire guys
― Hurting 2, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)
dude, old-man style is in this fall, or hadn't you noticed? CARDIGANS.
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)
lil kevin gets the red hat
― jhøshea, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)
hats are for dads, or weird high school kids who smell bad
― n/a, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:51 (eighteen years ago)
seriously, I would love to be able to rock the steez of a NASA Mission Control circa 1962
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:51 (eighteen years ago)
elmo my point wasnt abt the particular style (although i dont find old man anything to emulate) but more the dressing up like part aka faking the funk lookin dumb
― jhøshea, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:52 (eighteen years ago)
I like the flowery jackets that elmo posted.
― n/a, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:53 (eighteen years ago)
jho, that just means those people don't know how to wear clothes, ie LOL CLOSE WEARING THEM AMIRITE?
― Laurel, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:54 (eighteen years ago)
yah and everyone wearing those hats is damning themselves
― jhøshea, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:56 (eighteen years ago)
dudes in middle school i had HOLSTERS.
on the real, like tiny wrist holsters just for my hot sauce that i would bust out at the lunch table.
i shit you NAUGHT.
-- BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 15:32 (1 hour ago)
were you the guy that wore a fedora too?
-- gff, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 15:34 (1 hour ago)
― deej, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:57 (eighteen years ago)
jhosh, I dig you, your accessories really do have to match your look, but I think a large part of fashion IS faking it. it is crucial to have a peer helper to tell you when your style has gone wack, tho.
re: those hates... if you're gonna have something in the hat-band, though, please take the factory-issue pimp feather out and substitute something a little more personalized.
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:57 (eighteen years ago)
hahaha those hats, I mean
i got a black wool cloche for fall/winter. very happy about it.
― lauren, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:57 (eighteen years ago)
-- n/a, Tuesday, September 25, 2007 10:51 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
contrary to nabisco i feel like this hat look could only truly come back if everyone was wearing them ... it became a part of the proper uniform
― deej, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:58 (eighteen years ago)
yah elmo usually i wouldnt be so picky abt it but theres something so gauche and contrived abt these hats. i havent really felt this way since the glory days of the ribbed turtleneck/cargo pants combo.
― jhøshea, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:01 (eighteen years ago)
n/a, shortly after posting those I went all impulsive and ordered this one:
http://www.karmaloop.com/Vendor/LER/zoom/1100--01-00Firezoom1.jpg
it's lined with pink-on-black polka dots, but sadly, not reversible. i am a total whore for color. :\
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:01 (eighteen years ago)
sweet
― jhøshea, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:02 (eighteen years ago)
hahaha, jhosh, ribbed turtleneck sweater + cargo parts + tiny sissy GAP hat + monkstrap shooz???
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:03 (eighteen years ago)
bonus points for dreadlocks
― jhøshea, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:05 (eighteen years ago)
I like that one, but I prefer the light blue one with the pink flowers.
Seriously, I could never wear hats because they are a major part of my dad's "look."
― n/a, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:09 (eighteen years ago)
let's all just be glad that we have years before someone decides that the bucket hat is worth revisiting
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:11 (eighteen years ago)
"every time men's hats become a Thing"
http://www.edinphoto.org.uk/0_edin_t/0_edinburgh_transport_trams_pilrig_tram_and_crowd.jpg
― jed_, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:12 (eighteen years ago)
das alota hats!!!!!!
― jhøshea, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:12 (eighteen years ago)
i also hold those military-style caps in great contempt. just as bad as a baseball hat, you're not fooling anyone, you urban outfitted jerks.
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:14 (eighteen years ago)
agreed
― jhøshea, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:16 (eighteen years ago)
There's a really transparent visual difference between hats worn in a standard-male-attire way and hats worn in a "bet I'd look cool in a hat" way.
A large part of that difference is that lots of guys now don't seem to really get that hats are, like, clothing: they appear to say to themselves "you know what would make me look kinda slick? A HAT," and then they go out wearing the same baggy jeans and Sketchers and oversize t-shirts as before, except now with a fedora on top. There doesn't seem to be much notion that one's hat choices are actually supposed to work in concert with whatever else one is wearing. A hat does not make you look like Bogart if you're wearing American Eagle everywhere else.
You know what else is getting sold all up everywhere suddenly, is vests. Pinstriped vests. Everyone who was on the edge about the suspenders will hit these up, which in boy-cases is just more looking-like-Pete-Doherty but in girl-cases is part of that slight resurgence of Helen-Hunt-in-1994-wear.
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:33 (eighteen years ago)
ok i agree totally about the poor choice of hats in that circumstance then i was thinking more in a suit + slacks way
― deej, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:35 (eighteen years ago)
http://zer0control.com/fits/0182007/ininterest.jpg http://www.epiccentre.com/doky/waywt/waywt091707.jpg
HATS for FALL 2007: the jazz musician junkie look is IN
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:38 (eighteen years ago)
haha, bonus vest in that first photo
i've also noticed a resurgence in suspenders & braces. old man style, i tell ya.
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:40 (eighteen years ago)
elmo, where did your first pic come from? that guy posts on a fashion message board i read sometimes.. him & a girl who is one of the most stylish people ever (though i wish she would smile occasionally!). is from superfuture?
― daria-g, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:43 (eighteen years ago)
on second thought maybe that's not him just someone trying the same style?..
― daria-g, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:44 (eighteen years ago)
and lauren where did you find a cloche hat? i want one but the vintage ones are usually too small!
― daria-g, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:45 (eighteen years ago)
daria, i grabbed it from the waywt thread on superfuture, yah
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:46 (eighteen years ago)
The reason most young people look bad in hats is that they don't wear them with proper clothes.
― Hurting 2, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:47 (eighteen years ago)
That kind of stuff is so universal across chain-level stores lately that I've more or less decided to just dress like Hugh Laurie in the BBC Wooster and Jeeves adaptations. Most recent clothing purchases: corduroy country trousers, tweed painter's jacket, Oxford shirts, Oxford shoes
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:47 (eighteen years ago)
Once cold weather hits and I can switch to fitted wool jackets and silk scarves and pumps etc I fully expect to land on a street fashion blog. PHIL, ARE YOU LISTENING?
― Laurel, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:49 (eighteen years ago)
I will not, however, be able to ride a bike in that get-up, which is sad.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:50 (eighteen years ago)
omg we should start an ilx fashion blog!
― n/a, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:57 (eighteen years ago)
it would be terrible!
daria, i bit the bullet and got one at agnes b after quite a bit of fruitless searching for a less expensive model.
― lauren, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:02 (eighteen years ago)
can someone recommend me a fall jacket
― deej, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:03 (eighteen years ago)
re:porkpies fuck a porkpie that is all
― sleep, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:04 (eighteen years ago)
I saw that in a movie once.
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:04 (eighteen years ago)
i would only endorse an ilx fashion blog if it could be full of tyra.gif
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:06 (eighteen years ago)
What kind of fall jacket do you want, D? Like a short zippy one, a light wooly thing, a longer raincoat, something more park-y? Do you tend toward natural-looking fabrics or more casual/sporty stuff?
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:08 (eighteen years ago)
park-y should be PARKA-y
not sure what i'm going with exactly, something i can wear when going 'out' as well would be ideal tho so nothing too heavy or raincoat-esque i think
― deej, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:21 (eighteen years ago)
hah i was confused about that, not parka-y i don't think. something a bit lighter.
i have a medium-husky build 5'9 175lbs so some shorter jackets can make me look shorter than i am
― deej, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:23 (eighteen years ago)
http://imgs.yoox.biz/41/410559622C_2.jpg
pinstripe belted blazer? hmmmm
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)
fwiw, i hate hate hate how men's designer fashion is made for waifs & midgets
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:28 (eighteen years ago)
i would look silly in that
― deej, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:29 (eighteen years ago)
it's a pretty silly thing
― sleep, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:30 (eighteen years ago)
Speaking as someone who tends more toward rhino than gazelle, I certainly agree.
xpost - I agree with Elmo.
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:31 (eighteen years ago)
I think by "midgets" you mean REALLY REALLY TALL PEOPLE
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:38 (eighteen years ago)
yah wtf
― jhøshea, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:38 (eighteen years ago)
actually, no, by midgets I mean "people of average height and stature"
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)
I just had a selection of jacket styles for D to look through, but freaking ILX can't seem to post the links without hitting an error.
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:50 (eighteen years ago)
I think my favorite of them was this Paul Frank one, which looks like it'd be comfy and casual for fall, though its hoody-like qualities might defeat the purpose for some people:
http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/productdetail.jsp?_dyncharset=ISO-8859-1&_dynSessConf=7976839263081328355&itemdescription=true&itemCount=-1&id=13521265&parentid=M_APP_OUTERWEAR&sortProperties=%2Bproduct.marketingPriority%2C-product.startDate&navCount=7&_D%3AnavCount=+&navAction=poppush&color=&_DARGS=%2Furban%2Fcatalog%2Fcommon%2Fitemlink.jsp
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 17:52 (eighteen years ago)
that looks good, along the lines of what i'm thinking. is there a more formal alternative you saw?
― deej, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 18:13 (eighteen years ago)
what is the consensus on tie-dye? i've been noticing the sort of sloppy, home-made looking dyes and bleach treatments making an appearance here and there on fashion blogs and retail stores, but I get the feeling tie-dye will never outlive its hippy-dip collegiate stoner reputation.
i like tie-dye, fwiw.
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 18:33 (eighteen years ago)
(full disclosure: i work for a tshirt co. that specializes in tie-dye but most of our stuff is, to be honest, horrendous unwearable shit)
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)
D, I think the more traditional item along those lines would actually be kind of like a toggle coat, wouldn't it?
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 18:34 (eighteen years ago)
i love my hoodies, but if you're going to get a jacket, i'd say go for one without a hood
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 18:41 (eighteen years ago)
like, go for classic first
Oh wait, no -- last time I was at UO, they had a more tweedy / military-jacket thing along those lines, which might work for you. But I can't seem to find it on the website. Although one advantage of that Paul Frank one is that it'd be decently made -- the UO store brands are always a little overpriced for stuff like jackets, and not exactly constructed in a keep-for-years kind of way.
Hoods are handy in places where it's sometimes cold and windy on the ears! Also if you're an umbrella-loser.
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 18:46 (eighteen years ago)
umbrella loser!
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 18:55 (eighteen years ago)
They have some nice jackets at H&M right now. I just got one. I was going to post some pics but their website is really stupid.
― n/a, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 18:58 (eighteen years ago)
yeah i guess i was thinking more about sport coats than fall jackets there but it's true that a collar without a hood on it tends to look more grown-up/dressed-up than one with a hood. i do love hooded fall jackets though! and corduroy ones. i like the blend of formal and casual and cute
omg the hooded coat-jacket is a fashion mullet nooooo
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 18:59 (eighteen years ago)
that's because it's coded by illiterate bengalis for 10c/day
oh sorry i'm wrong, that's just the clothes
xpost
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:00 (eighteen years ago)
Oh god yeah you don't want, like, a topcoat with a hood!
But it's one of the fun perks of fall + spring jackets that a hood is A-OK. (I think this is because a jacket jacket in spring/fall has an inherent casualness to it -- if you wanted to look trad dressy you'd just throw on a blazer!)
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:03 (eighteen years ago)
Hoods on jackets are ok, but hats with coats are taboo.
Okay, you maniacs.
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:05 (eighteen years ago)
Huh? I think people were more objecting to nice hats with, like, crappy t-shirts
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:06 (eighteen years ago)
Hideous:
http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/MEPOD/10077493%7ECatulle-Mendes-French-Writer-in-His-Hat-and-Coat-Posters.jpg
Stylin'!
http://hacks.mit.edu/Hacks/by_year/1996/unabomber/unabomber-fbi.gif
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:08 (eighteen years ago)
xpost and broken image link, AND scolded! TRIFECTA!
http://www.antiquemapsandprints.com/p-4214.jpg There, that's pretty close to my first image.
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:09 (eighteen years ago)
should i go w/ a blazer instead? decisions decisions
― deej, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:10 (eighteen years ago)
Anyway, I do agree with the idea that hats should coordinate with outfits. I have one friend who believes that hats should only be worn with suits, though, and he's out of his mind.
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:10 (eighteen years ago)
Hat-coordination exceptions: hats worn primarily for shade in hot, sunburny summer months. Sometimes you just do what you gotta do.
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:11 (eighteen years ago)
Deej, you should have a decent blazer either way -- corduroy ones are good if you're gonna wear them in a jacket-y way (looser shape) -- but an actual jacket-jacket comes in handy if some sort of weather is threatening to chill your chest and sternum ("the blazers, they do nothing")
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:18 (eighteen years ago)
i have a blazer but lost like 20 lbs this spring and its fit is ... different. i think i need a new one.
― deej, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:19 (eighteen years ago)
i hear that, i need to take all my blazers to a tailor to be taken in before i can wear them out this fall
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:23 (eighteen years ago)
("the blazers, they do nothing") haha but then you just wear a big scarf and be photographed by sartorialist blog guy!
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:29 (eighteen years ago)
-- molly mummenschanz, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:33 (2 weeks ago) Link
-- nabisco, Thursday, 6 September 2007 20:35 (2 weeks ago) Link
No one realized that Nabisco also found a Taylor Nichols: http://www.playlust.net/get_galeriebild_gross.php?id=136
― C0L1N B..., Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:31 (eighteen years ago)
Ha: I'm currently trying to work out whether I should switch things up from the previous 7 years of my life and actually NOT wear a scarf 24/7 from October through approximately May
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:39 (eighteen years ago)
i think you should take if off for showering
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)
you should check out the Heimstone girl, N. I think she could be your new obsession.
― Yerac, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)
she has a weird alternate universe winona ryder thing going on.
― Yerac, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:42 (eighteen years ago)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/01/Bakert.jpg
Nabisco?!!?
― Oilyrags, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:43 (eighteen years ago)
cute
there is an awesome grey sweater-jacket on the heimstone site (under 'vestes') that is a nice alternative to fall jacket/blazer/hoodie. i've seen that kind of jacket for guys too and it looks good. i really want one.
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 19:47 (eighteen years ago)
the heimstone girl is making me want to cut my hair. and buy all new clothes and shoes.
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:00 (eighteen years ago)
Ah, the whole trick there is that most of those you see for guys are very business-casual or LL Beany or Brooks Brothersy, which makes a guy forget to look for more stylish ones.
(The other thing I always wear in the cold is actually a knit sweater-style hoodie with a ton of lining; blurring the distinctions between knit sweaters and outerwear is a noble autumn pursuit)
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:00 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.tendances-de-mode.com/dotclear/images3/Mode-132.jpg ok. i want to be this girl.
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:13 (eighteen years ago)
You aren't?
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:14 (eighteen years ago)
i know i've mentioned this somewhere before, but my mom knit a replica of that exact dr. who scarf for xmas a couple years ago for my brother.
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:16 (eighteen years ago)
haha srsly! i don't think it would be too hard for you to be! xpost
i like yr crazy new hoodie, elmo
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:17 (eighteen years ago)
also your mom is rad
she does kind of look like me 5 years ago with better clothes (among other things)
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:18 (eighteen years ago)
you have to watch the heimstone video with the sound off.
― Yerac, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:19 (eighteen years ago)
yeah i watched it with the sound on :/ unless you are naturally that skinny you def do not be that skinny to be that girl, btw, l
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:24 (eighteen years ago)
she is much cuter in the video than in the photos!
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:25 (eighteen years ago)
so you can just stay your beautiful self, l, and wear hot clothes and belts and not get kind of weird looking in the jaw area
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:26 (eighteen years ago)
there's definitely no worries of me getting as skinny as her but i do still kind of want her haircut!
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)
her haircut is also making me want to cut my hair! but i'm gonna hang on
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:37 (eighteen years ago)
me tooo. but only because it's the longest it's been since highschool and i'm digging it.
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:37 (eighteen years ago)
you two
― nabisco, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:45 (eighteen years ago)
we really need a clothing, style, nabisco scarf, hair board.
― Yerac, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)
I was thinking about buying one of the heimstone dresses at Jumelle on Bedford and then realized I could just go to Paris for the amount of money and then I remembered I don't really love Paris.
― Yerac, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)
OMG no I would never get another lick of work done.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)
haha xp
we really do. because if we did maybe I would actually sew more because I would want to post pics.
― Yerac, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:55 (eighteen years ago)
Don't talk to me about sewing, every black skirt I own is currently in the "needs to be hemmed" pile.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:56 (eighteen years ago)
I just got all my awesome tights and my prada-like socks from Tabio so I have all these long dresses and skirts that I have chopped off to be shorter.
― Yerac, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 20:58 (eighteen years ago)
i would also never get any work done if we had that board omg i srsly almost wrote my thesis on fashion and tech but then changed my mind for some reason long ago, which was pos a mistake but did save me from having everything in my life be about fashion and then making me crazy and pos making me hate fashion in the end. i do not know.
hey guess what tho? i have a job interview next week! for which i will have to wear something nice! b/c it is not a hippie job! whoa. i do not know what to wear.
xpost i also have a couple skirts that require hemming
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 21:00 (eighteen years ago)
xpost (sorry, catching up)
elmo i love tie-dye! i just got the most gorgeous silk tie-dye scarf imported from thailand on ebay. it's fantastic, i might get some more. i'm also considering tie-dying myself a long sleeve shirt a la balenciaga, maybe not a turtleneck.
ebay had the most awesome ever vintage anne demeulemeester boots in suede with a tie-dye design, in my size even, but when i found them they were bid up to about $250 with a few days left.. can't afford :(
― daria-g, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 21:06 (eighteen years ago)
i actually mentioned this today on a different thread
i would like an i love shopping board! i don't even really love shopping but there are lots of people here i want shopping tips from.
-- bell_labs, Tuesday, September 25, 2007 6:35 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 21:06 (eighteen years ago)
pics please of so-called fashionable tye-dye! i think i know what you mean but am not sure
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 21:07 (eighteen years ago)
it should be, like, an i love style! board maybe?
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 21:08 (eighteen years ago)
http://65.254.42.84/%7Emstephen/images/silk/62984a.jpg
― daria-g, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 21:09 (eighteen years ago)
Okay, I can see how that might redeem tie-dye but I will not accept any other variant, and Elmo that goes for yr Tshirts, too. :( Sorry, kitten.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 21:11 (eighteen years ago)
mine is violet-blue and dark maroon and white. i don't wear it like a shawl though, just like a regular scarf. the colors are a little hard to match but it seemed to work with these caramel slim trousers + a burgundy vintage 40's cardigan over a black shirt.. last week, when the weather was cold. it's in the 80s again here though
― daria-g, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 21:11 (eighteen years ago)
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/87/243505346_3d39c4a0f3.jpg
you can't really see it very well, but it's the only photo I have of me wearing it -- it's from last year. it's a really intricate (lots of knotwork & bleaching involved, I think) v-shaped dye that terminates around mid-torso -- inherited from my dad :)
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 21:12 (eighteen years ago)
board should be called "I GOT STYLE" xpost
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)
http://i10.ebayimg.com/06/i/000/b6/42/a6f3_1.JPG%3Fset_id%3D7
sold, for $290 :(
― daria-g, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)
i could get into some really complex tye-dye maybe
haha i like I GOT STYLLE
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)
damn, can't hotlink the image - here - anne d boots
― daria-g, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)
i am pilfering a sample dye from work today -- really wild krinkly type stuff... let's see if i can get a photo up...
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 21:27 (eighteen years ago)
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e239/allocryptic/0925071724.jpg
there we go
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 21:33 (eighteen years ago)
nice! i like
― daria-g, Tuesday, 25 September 2007 22:05 (eighteen years ago)
my issue with tye-dye is that i want the colours to be more clear or vibrant or something. i think what i would like is a false tye-dye with really clear edges. made by computers.
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 02:59 (eighteen years ago)
we do need a style board so we can post things such as:
i really like this dress
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 03:01 (eighteen years ago)
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1433/1409511944_302be50ed9_m.jpg or this guy.
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 14:55 (eighteen years ago)
OR THAT GUY
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)
he is so dapper!
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 15:15 (eighteen years ago)
michael white in dog form
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 15:15 (eighteen years ago)
so came across Face Hunter ( http://facehunter.blogspot.com/ ) and saw this massive listing of fashion blog links on the sidebar. gonna load me up feeds into g.reader, hells yeah.
---
other street style sites
* amsterdam (damstyle) * amsterdam (fad tony) * athens (athens wear) * athens (we need fashion) * austin (austin style watch) * australia (now now pics) * barcelona (picturing fashion) * barcelona (mujeres con estilo) * beijing (make cute snap) * berlin (stil in berlin) * brasil (curitiba street fashion) * bucharest (bucuresti looks) * bucharest (lookarest) * buenos aires (buenos aires street style) * buenos aires (cityrunway) * buenos aires (b. a. in da house) * buenos aires (ciudad stencil) * caracas (streetwide) * chicago (sundays best) * chicago (calle moda) * colombia (iconiablog) * copenhagen (copenhagen streetstyle) * copenhagen (cph street fashion) * gothenburg (pose and click) * hamburg (stilvorlage) * helsinki (hel looks) * ireland (fashion filosofy) * italy (fashion hunter) * istanbul (istanbul street style) * korea (the look) * leipzig (tragfläche leipzig) * lisbon (lisboa closet) * lisbon (street confetti) * liverpool (hoy fashion) * london (savvy london) * london (style scout) * london (oh! you pretty things) * london (apparel web) * london (london street fashion) * london (glam canyon) * lorena brazil (is blog) * los angeles (l.a. looks) * los angeles (street seen) * los angeles (trends west) * madrid & barcelona (cool people) * manchester (manchester looks) * manila (manila style) * mexico city (zamuraika) * milan (prada and meatballs) * minneapolis (the minneapoline) * montpellier (the smf) * moscow (look at me) * moscow (moscow street fashion) * melbourne (melbourne runway) * melbourne (kids in melbourne) * midwest (the midwasteland) * montreal (mtl street) * munich (style clicker) * new york (the sartorialist) * new york (altamira nyc) * new-york (apparel web) * new-zealand (crowd couture) * oslo (oslostil) * paris (dans paris) * philadelphia (broad&market) * philadelphia (faceadelphia) * poland (polish street fashion) * portland (patricia.no) * reykjavik (reykjavik looks) * rio de janeiro (rio style) * san francisco (streetfancy) * sao paulo (sao paulo style) * seattle (pike/pine) * seoul (your boyhood) * shanghai (fashion trend disgest) * shanghai (apparel web) * shanghai (creative research workshop) * singapore (the clothes project) * stockholm (sthlm stil) * stockholm (stockholm streetstyle) * stockholm (you catwalk) * tallinn (just glitter lust) * tel aviv (the streets walker) * tokyo (apparel web) * tokyo (tokyo street style) * toronto (toronto street fashion) * ukraine (street style) * usa (street seen) * utah (the beehive state) * vancouver (vancouver streetstyle) * vancouver (the commodified) * warsaw (visions of warsaw) * warsaw (warsaw streets) * warsaw (colors of warsaw) * washington d.c. (panda head) * winnipeg (hooks n' pegs) * zurich (playlust)
and that's not all! these links should get this thread going
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 15:37 (eighteen years ago)
loving this look:
http://bp0.blogger.com/_rKFvPxxi9A4/ReoraFxMMzI/AAAAAAAAASw/M0S7KP_Nc3o/s1600/stella.JPG
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 15:40 (eighteen years ago)
THAT BOXER IS AMAZING!!!
― ENBB, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 15:42 (eighteen years ago)
the two chicago blogs: one is dead, and the other is WACK
― deej, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 15:48 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp1.blogger.com/_7qJu2wxfrAM/RdqSOEd13CI/AAAAAAAAAHk/Pe9fVaKHuCY/s320/5.jpg
come on
― deej, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 15:49 (eighteen years ago)
90% of them are taken at sonotheque for christs sake
and several are of uffie
― deej, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 15:50 (eighteen years ago)
also last updated in april.
chicago does not spring to mind as an epicenter of fashion.
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 15:58 (eighteen years ago)
yeah facehunter blog list is hit and miss i used to really like helsinki and copenhagen ones but it's gotten samey. i mean, i can only take so many tight jeans and layers of bright t-shirts. mix it up. also, all these blogs need more people who are not aged 16-20.
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:14 (eighteen years ago)
and if they are not aged 16-20 are not yuppies or hipsters or hipster-yuppies.
i ask a lot
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:15 (eighteen years ago)
...or hamsters.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:17 (eighteen years ago)
Where is fashion blog for people who look put-together and authoritative and strong but also INTERESTING, who have not given in to mainstream fashion mags/trends???
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:19 (eighteen years ago)
Of all the global blogs I've checked lately, S-list came the closest but even he tends toward the Vice mag style of hot-checking (ie whatever clothes on hott boy/girl).
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:20 (eighteen years ago)
i'm also kind of cold on this particular hair half-up trend. i don't know, it kind of looks like they've clipped their hair back so they can wash their face. but maybe it's b/c i don't think it suits my face, or a lot of people's faces. and it's like a backlash to the bang trend. and i like the bang trend.
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:21 (eighteen years ago)
lol hamster street style
btw big list of fashion blogs ohno
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:25 (eighteen years ago)
Holy fuck, THIS = YOWZA:
http://bp1.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/RvUo7t-8PAI/AAAAAAAACJQ/IuEQmIkh8WQ/s1600-h/RedBikew.jpg
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:28 (eighteen years ago)
Hm sorry,
....THIS!
http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e66/LimitedLiabilityGirl/RedBikew.jpg
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:30 (eighteen years ago)
Can we agree that she defies the "half-up" crappy hair trend, Rrrobyn? B/c I agree with you normally, I think pulled straight back the hair does NOTHING for anyone...if you still look good that way it is because your beauty TRANSCENDS the unflattering angles...which is quite possibly the point but still...meh, I say.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:34 (eighteen years ago)
haha i was gonna post that last week on the girls in skirts riding bikes drinking beers thread and realized that really her only qualification for that was girl + bike. but yes! this is totally HOT AND AWESOME! xpost
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:35 (eighteen years ago)
That was a popular hair style for little girls when I was 5 or so.
― KitCat, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:36 (eighteen years ago)
i'm having trouble believing that is street fashion and not a modeling shoot. it just looks too perfect and posed!
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:36 (eighteen years ago)
i think her hair is more pulled back from lower on the sides than in examples i previously posted where hair is more pulled back from top. but yes you are right - she is owning whatever she is doing
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:37 (eighteen years ago)
haha yeah if i do that with my hair i kinda do look like i'm 5!
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:38 (eighteen years ago)
matte finish crimson lip == win
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:38 (eighteen years ago)
Bell -- I know but Sartorialist said he snapped her on the street on 10th Ave!
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:42 (eighteen years ago)
her lips match her modeling portfolio or whatever that notebook is
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:42 (eighteen years ago)
Altho apparently she IS a model who speaks seven languages.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:44 (eighteen years ago)
Satorialist has done an accessories shoot in this month's British Elle. He picked the girls, they wore their own clothes and the Elle team did hair and make-up, gave them handbags etc. This could be one of those, but I'd have to check in the magazine.
― Anna, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:45 (eighteen years ago)
a beautiful model who speaks seven languages?! i hope she is a total bitch at least.
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:53 (eighteen years ago)
As long as it's not the over-entitled kind...I quite like no-nonsense-y difficult people, which is certainly the look she's giving off.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:54 (eighteen years ago)
if you tell me she also tutors inner-city youths in math i might just shoot myself.
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:55 (eighteen years ago)
haha
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:55 (eighteen years ago)
she's got the cure for cancer in her notebook
Dudes, the cure for cancer is obv magical hottness + hardass BMXing. Bell, time to get you a bike, girl.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)
McArthur Genius Grant goes to - that redheaded hottie cyclist with the awes boots.
― Oilyrags, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, the fact that it's a DIRTBIKE is kinda the clincher.
(But 10th Ave? I thought that was Houston)
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 17:02 (eighteen years ago)
Oh wait, of course it isn't Houston
http://bp3.blogger.com/_kqtCX8rtWOI/RtyMzkijNzI/AAAAAAAABJs/4soMhnKA2yw/s1600-h/CIMG1368.JPG
yes hello i am from iceland...?
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 17:05 (eighteen years ago)
^^^ this
I thought the hair half up is just a traditional hairstyle. How can it be in?
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 17:47 (eighteen years ago)
I thought every girl wears this hairstyle at least 1-2 times a month.
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 17:48 (eighteen years ago)
No, like when just the bangs are pulled straight back -- a very Mandy Moore sort of thing.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 17:49 (eighteen years ago)
the straight, half-up style is so not a new trend! if anything, i think it's lost ground over the past few years as the pin-straight blowout has ceased to be the default hairstyle.
― lauren, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 17:50 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, I remember it being on Popular years and years ago, plus plenty of mod examples as well. I still don't like it done too tightly, although as part of a set with lots of volume in the crown, well...maybe.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 17:53 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp2.blogger.com/_kqtCX8rtWOI/RvF4eABrSEI/AAAAAAAABLc/8JgMjJfLQcI/s1600-h/CIMG1503.JPG
^^^ it's a very, uh, advanced look, but i think this fellow demonstrates a successful deployment the man-hat
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 17:54 (eighteen years ago)
BTW, Nick's "What is the MASCULINE style" thread needed this:
http://bp2.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/RvPFAd-8O7I/AAAAAAAACIo/amqtxsZqrO4/s400/GreeneSt..jpg
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 17:59 (eighteen years ago)
It totally did, I saw that guy today and drooled a little.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 17:59 (eighteen years ago)
Classic example of that hair, btw:
http://cache.eb.com/eb/image?id=66092&rendTypeId=4
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 18:02 (eighteen years ago)
i think the fact that the classic example is deneuve should be a hint that it's not the easiest look to pull off.
― lauren, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 18:05 (eighteen years ago)
Haha. Thank you. Let's all agree that fewer people should do it.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 18:07 (eighteen years ago)
not that i'm against people trying things, mind you! it's just that... well, for example: sarah jessica parker used to do it fairly often with the end result being an even more pronounced equine quality.
― lauren, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 18:08 (eighteen years ago)
MULE
OK, from the hel-looks archive, this is just a great photograph:
http://hel-looks.com/photos/20060121_01.jpg
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 18:10 (eighteen years ago)
Horizon should be lower!
― roxymuzak, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 18:14 (eighteen years ago)
Tuomas (28) "This jacket is my first warm jacket for years. I thought it's time to stop freezing this winter. Before I used to wear too tight leather jackets... My sunglasses are Prada and jeans Acne. I've got many pairs of Converse and I usually wear the full-black ones. I have a collection of oddities: last summer I bought four second hand riding helmets. Who knows – some day I might need them!"
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 18:14 (eighteen years ago)
You guys I'm gagging for these boots but they're pull ons-only and I'll bet you money that I can't get my ankles or calves into 'em. SOB
http://www.fryeboots.com/subpages/images/77186BAR.jpg
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:18 (eighteen years ago)
I think if you were more encouraging and supportive toward your calves, and really believed in them, they just might show you they can achieve anything they put their minds to.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:27 (eighteen years ago)
Maybe if I encouraged them with a steak knife, like Cinderella's step-sisters....
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:35 (eighteen years ago)
I'm not an expert on anatomy or anything, but aren't calves and ankles supposed to support the person, not the other way around?
― Oilyrags, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:37 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.fryeboots.com/subpages/catalog-detail.asp?sn=77985&col=BLK&fcp=catalog.asp?cat=SEASONAL@sty=@gen=1@goToPage=1
i like these ones.
― lauren, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:40 (eighteen years ago)
mmm frye boots. i've been wanting a pair for years but cannot justify the expense!
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:43 (eighteen years ago)
i bought a pair of these like a year ago, but i kind of feel too industrial in them
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:46 (eighteen years ago)
the zipper on the side is very big and silver
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:47 (eighteen years ago)
nothing to do with shoes, but i was just looking at the chloe site. bright burnt orange is one of the prominent colors. i might have to add this to my wardrobe palette.
― lauren, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:48 (eighteen years ago)
I keep looking at these
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)
My sad shoe thing -- I keep meaning to buy a pair of these ...
http://i.onlineshoes.com/images/br095/62924_200_45.jpg
... and yet I've developed some kind of phobia that keeps me from actually purchasing sensible shoes without weird details on them.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)
I'm not sure I like my gradual slide toward being the only guy who checks this thread ... where's Cutty when you need him?
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:52 (eighteen years ago)
CAREY I was just looking at those!! I saw them somewhere online NOT Topshop.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:53 (eighteen years ago)
you've still got elmo, nabisco
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)
Prob shoes.com honestly.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)
i was so in love with those spring chloe triple strap black flats. you could never find them in any store in black though, only brown. I finally gave in and got the inferior but $500 less pair from dolce vita
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)
ooh cute
i seriously can't choose which frye boots are my favourite! but i do like these shoes http://www.fryeboots.com/subpages/images/72720SAP.jpg
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)
i'm here! I just don't post much.
― Will M., Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:55 (eighteen years ago)
caz, let me know if you ever end up ordering from ts. we could do one order and save on shipping.
― lauren, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:55 (eighteen years ago)
OH NO!
ok.
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:56 (eighteen years ago)
I've got it bookmarked and I've been checking it, nabisco, only I just kind of skim it- I enjoyed the Tuomas bit- but I'm kind of in The Third Age of Men's Fashion at this point, so I don't have anything to add.
― James Redd and the Blecchs, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:56 (eighteen years ago)
The Third Age of Menswear?
― James Redd and the Blecchs, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)
nabisco, i think the shininess of those shoes makes them less plain sometimes we need plain shoes. i guess.
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)
Lauren, after you guys left the pencil factory I drunkenly went over to Alter and bought these http://bp2.blogger.com/_4c8ipv24LdU/RuLqhjMANjI/AAAAAAAAAkg/btF_DkeTRA0/s1600-h/pierre+dumas+dolce+flats.jpg
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:58 (eighteen years ago)
ruh roh
what
― Will M., Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:59 (eighteen years ago)
the menaissance
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 20:59 (eighteen years ago)
i really love that show Men in Trees.
Carey, I know those boots with the two top snaps are avail domestically. Trying to find on shoes.com but try Zappo's, too.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:00 (eighteen years ago)
oooh, nice. franz didn't intervene at all?
i love how i'm like, "we can save on the shipping," as if i'm actually being frugal by suggesting that we order clothes we don't need and can't try on from a british web site that sells in GBP.
― lauren, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:00 (eighteen years ago)
i have a thing for these fryes, if only b/c i have never owned cowboy boots and these look like ones i could wear until the end of time http://www.fryeboots.com/subpages/images/77325BRN.jpg
(uhoh this is not a shoe thread sorry)
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:01 (eighteen years ago)
I shouldn't buy more shoes, but I ended up selling my saxophone for more than I thought I would get on ebay..
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:01 (eighteen years ago)
I bought franz a shirt and the shoes were only like 38 bucks. and I feel sorry for shopgirls in small indie boutiques.
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:02 (eighteen years ago)
haha menaissance i like those topshop boots with teh snaps/buttons - they are actually what my 'ooh cute' xpost was to upthread but paying in gbp + shipping = ugh
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:02 (eighteen years ago)
they take off the vat though.
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:04 (eighteen years ago)
I know I just got my Tabio tights and sock sent and I had paid in pounds and it was surprising how bad the dollar is. But my tights are so soft and strong that it is worth it.
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:05 (eighteen years ago)
I can justify Frye boots if their standard measurement around is 15.5 or 16 inches, actually! Thank goodness for shaft measurements on zappos.com.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:10 (eighteen years ago)
what denier of tabio did you get? the really heavy ones? i need new colourful tights xpost
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:10 (eighteen years ago)
what colors did you get? i want rose pink and dark orange.
― lauren, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:11 (eighteen years ago)
heh, "shaft measurements"
(just trying to keep the thread as man-friendly as possible)
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:11 (eighteen years ago)
hehe shaft measurements hehe xpost!!
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:12 (eighteen years ago)
omg look how cute! http://tabio.com/uk/detail/?hinban=27123
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)
My cat's name used to be Shaft.
― James Redd and the Blecchs, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1373/1436709811_502ffc6e5f_o.jpg
okay, the more i see of them, the more i am convinced that these super-high waisted jeans are just cruel and wrong
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)
Wow, even worse, those stick you with points right in the undersides of breastsesses. Excellent, just what we needed.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:14 (eighteen years ago)
so cruel and wrong
xpost - did you ever measure your cat?
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:17 (eighteen years ago)
you know where there are good socks and tights? japan
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:18 (eighteen years ago)
I got 80 (grey, ribbed dark blue? i think) and 110 denier (red, dark yellow, teal and another blue). And then I got 2 pairs of those knee high socks with the diff color band across the top and across the foot (like thicker non footless prada socks).
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:18 (eighteen years ago)
oh yeah, Tabio is a japanese company I think.
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:19 (eighteen years ago)
Her gloves look perfect for murdering someone.
― KitCat, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:20 (eighteen years ago)
That photo is from an Estonian Street Fashion blog o_0))!????
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)
i read style thread too, just too broke to really get into the spirit :-/
someone shd do the equivalent of 'dollar bin finds' thread on ilm for common thrift store clothing that works
― deej, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:28 (eighteen years ago)
Thee climate yes? ees cold in Eesti Vabariik.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:30 (eighteen years ago)
deej, dear, if it were common, it wouldn't be working.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:31 (eighteen years ago)
I'm sorry, that was totes obnoxious but I had to. I mean, c'mon!
individual pieces can be common, its the overall effect yr going for
― deej, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:32 (eighteen years ago)
I love when Laurel turns into Mae West.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:32 (eighteen years ago)
My friend bought a children's North Face down jacket for 4.99 yesterday at the thrift store, it will work perfectly to keep her toasty warm on the supah cheap tip. Good work, Friend of Mine! Not for the fashion thread, though.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:34 (eighteen years ago)
oh man, i'm totally going thrift shopping after work
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:36 (eighteen years ago)
i keep meaning to hit up all the rich old lady consignment shops near my work (UES). they are all up on the second floor and you have to buzz to get in and that always makes me a little intimidated.
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:38 (eighteen years ago)
by which i mean NOW
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:38 (eighteen years ago)
Sorry, deej, what I mean is NOT AT ALL that awesome things can't be had at the SA or for cheap because lord knows I have found some winners (hi there Paterson NJ Red, White & Blue, I'm looking at YOU), but that each of them would be unique, so basically we could all photo-document our thrifting and show off our finds, but otherwise...I think it's best to cut your tastebuds on the pricey stuff as inspiration, and then go looking for things you can afford with your own spin on them.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:39 (eighteen years ago)
Bell -- which ones? I always go to the Designer Resale men's shop on 81st, but I don't know of any second-floor ones.
Those places are one of my favorite things about NYC -- that your resale/thrift shopping can be for year-old designer stuff, not just actual ... thrift.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:42 (eighteen years ago)
when i am next in nyc i am going to these crazy designer thrift shops ok?
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:43 (eighteen years ago)
i don't know the names off the top of my head but i always walk by them! one is on like, 84th and madison i think?
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:43 (eighteen years ago)
also i love these chloe boots http://bp1.blogger.com/_B8d7lbGVH-o/RrDdpx_U9XI/AAAAAAAAAsE/ysF7H7f4yk4/s1600-h/85513_1.jpg
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:44 (eighteen years ago)
these ones
i really miss dressing nicely. This is what never leaving Williamsburg does to me.
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:47 (eighteen years ago)
Ha, I think there's a whole dozen-store nexus in the 80s of the NYC elite going "eww, that's so last year" and liquidating their designer buys!
I have had patchy luck lately with Tokyo 7, which used to be my favorite downtown resale. Although I did try on a Cardin sport coat there recently, which ... just perfect, I could have run for president in this thing. But it seems like their men's stuff gets progressively less great and the women's stuff progressively better -- or at least I walk around seeing not so much to like except for girls trying on awesome stuff they look hot in.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:48 (eighteen years ago)
i used to find stuff all the time at tokyo 7, but never do anymore. i think it's cos they only buy size negative 300
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:50 (eighteen years ago)
xpost - I had an awkward moment there where this girl was deciding not to buy a skirt, and I had to exercise self-control to avoid saying "you realize you look ridiculously hot in that, right?"
xpost - ha, maybe it's not just the men's that goes downhill, then. Maybe it's just all picked over too quickly?
― nabisco, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:51 (eighteen years ago)
I think we should have one drinkey drinkey bartime funtime fap this fall in ev/les, so at least I can fall down again and flash nabisco my opaque tights like old times.
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:52 (eighteen years ago)
ha, i think there was something on jezebel.com where they got h&m jcrew and club monaco pieces of clothing and cut out the tags and sewed in designer tags and went to several places to see who would buy what and for how much. I think Tokio 7 was one of them.
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:53 (eighteen years ago)
http://jezebel.com/gossip/top/label-whores-hit-the-east-village-262000.php
― Yerac, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 21:55 (eighteen years ago)
that was pretty funny! i am tempted to go shopping again myself.. last time i checked one of my fave thrifts i got a wicked 80's daryl k black jacket with shoulder pads (not absurd football player style, but definitely a strong shoulder) for $5. most dc area thrifts are lame though.. awful 80's business suits and ann taylor and conservative stuff from department stores
― daria-g, Wednesday, 26 September 2007 22:17 (eighteen years ago)
i really wish that i could remember the name of the ues consignment shop mentioned in last year's new yorker style issue, in the profile of the guy who runs decades in la. it's one of the places that he sources from and sounded great - small, fairly dirty, not particularly organized, and filled with halston cocktail dresses for under $200.
― lauren, Thursday, 27 September 2007 13:28 (eighteen years ago)
those chloe boots are sick, btw. i'm on a boot quest at the moment and already terribly frustrated. i come over all goldilocks with boots, like "that heel is too narrow" or "that zipper is too noticeable" or "what is that ugly tassel doing there." and really, what i'm looking for is SO basic: plain black leather, just below the knee with a 2" heel and oval toe. i need to hit the vintage boot emporium on rivington, i think.
― lauren, Thursday, 27 September 2007 13:34 (eighteen years ago)
perhaps we need a thrift shopping thread? i got (1) cowboy shirt in a large-sized black plaid with white/pink/teal in it, (2) black & white houndstooth sport coat, very narrow lapel, (3) a grey & black geometric zigzag pattern sweater. and all for less than $20!
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e239/allocryptic/a.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 27 September 2007 13:36 (eighteen years ago)
nice bob mug.
― lauren, Thursday, 27 September 2007 13:38 (eighteen years ago)
that bob mug is easily the most crucial accessory in my life.
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 27 September 2007 13:40 (eighteen years ago)
(new coat and shirt v. nice, too.)
― lauren, Thursday, 27 September 2007 13:43 (eighteen years ago)
a, you look great! and nice job on the thrift shopping! i haven't been in soo long. seeing plaid shirts like that makes me never want to throw another piece of clothing out again b/c i had a couple great plaid shirts in the early-mid-90s and 'got over them'/fashion ended and they were so great and nicely worn and now they are gonnne :(
those chloe boots are basically IT to me. and i thought i didn't like gold and black, i thought i didn't even like gold. but i was wrong. they rule.
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 27 September 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)
yes, very nice! i also got, last time i went, a men's (or boy's? it's quite small) grey, black, and red wool plaid shirt jacket - it's good quality and maybe 60's vintage, i think and a valentino r.e.d. ivory v neck sweater, not something i'd seek out in a shop but it fits well, at least. I've always been a fan of plaid..
i went to club monaco yesterday and they had black slim fit jeans with a super high waist, so i tried them on. actually not bad! i may have to get a high waisted pair (though not *super* high).. couldn't get the cm ones as the cut was a little off for me. i also dig the wide leg trousers but have yet to try a pair that didn't make me look four sizes bigger than i am!
― daria-g, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:18 (eighteen years ago)
i saw a girl with really nice super dark wide leg jeans last night and asked her where she got them. uniqlo! they were a reasonable cut, not voluminous, and not flare-y.
― lauren, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:24 (eighteen years ago)
i just looked at them on the uniqlo site - they are nice! btw uniqlo website is difficult
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:32 (eighteen years ago)
well, it is weird - the jeans are 'index' number '49'
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:33 (eighteen years ago)
i know, right? such a tsuris.
― lauren, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:33 (eighteen years ago)
word of the day!
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:37 (eighteen years ago)
Uniqlo jeans don't fit me:(
― Virginia Plain, Thursday, 27 September 2007 15:47 (eighteen years ago)
hm, so renting style? at first i thought it was just bizarre but it's also totally brilliant
― rrrobyn, Friday, 28 September 2007 04:57 (eighteen years ago)
so that jacket nabisco recommended is only avail in XL and i don't see it anywhere but urban outfitters site! does it exist elsewhere? would paul frank store sell it?
― deej, Friday, 28 September 2007 07:37 (eighteen years ago)
i dont even know that i want to get it but i just noticed this
oh jesus. apparently there was a "peanuts" themed fashion show at NY fashion week?
http://www.ambrel.net/2007/0907-snoopy/index.html
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 28 September 2007 14:25 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.ambrel.net/2007/0907-snoopy/IMG_2115.jpg
red baron.
http://www.ambrel.net/2007/0907-snoopy/IMG_2092.jpg
woodstock (by project runway season 2's laura bennett! woah)
http://www.ambrel.net/2007/0907-snoopy/IMG_2207.jpg
lucy van pelt.
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 28 September 2007 14:28 (eighteen years ago)
hehe i saw a guy with this yesterday: http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/I/41XTRB4VZBL._SS500_.jpg
― sleep, Friday, 28 September 2007 14:30 (eighteen years ago)
Was that guy you?
― Laurel, Friday, 28 September 2007 14:35 (eighteen years ago)
;-)
― sleep, Friday, 28 September 2007 14:39 (eighteen years ago)
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1039/1412846103_2dde9d3ba7.jpg
so this Matthew Williamson is not strictly tie-dye, it is a dip-dye, but i quite like the look. the shoes are all wrong, tho.
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 28 September 2007 14:49 (eighteen years ago)
I have a bone-colored wool + cashmere winter coat that after like two years of NYC subways will never be clean again...and I've wanted to dip-dye it orange and purple/burgundy for ages. I'm just afraid of how the dye will take vs not take, and I only get once chance.
― Laurel, Friday, 28 September 2007 14:52 (eighteen years ago)
how hard is it to dip dye? i would like to do the same with a few shirts.. i haven't tried since summer camp many years ago!
with a coat like that, though, wouldn't the problem more be with getting it wet than the actual dye?
― daria-g, Friday, 28 September 2007 15:02 (eighteen years ago)
yeah, with wool & chasmere I imagine it would take a lot of dye to fully saturate the fabric. depending on how much gradient you want between the colors, you'd have to dye the second color while the first was still slightly wet. sounds like a challenge.
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 28 September 2007 15:06 (eighteen years ago)
You can put things in the water to make it "wetter", to reduce surface tension so it doesn't bead up on wool etc. Other than that I'm willing to go crazy with the amount of dye...the problem is WHERE to do it, really. And yeah, I'd dip the purple while the orange was still wet, and then probably brush some stalagmite-shaped jags up and down so it wasn't an even line....or graduate the length of time in the purple so there's a fade...or something. It IS a challenge! Who wants to have a dyeing party?
― Laurel, Friday, 28 September 2007 15:09 (eighteen years ago)
purple + orange is one of my favorite color combinations.
― horseshoe, Friday, 28 September 2007 15:10 (eighteen years ago)
brush some stalagmite-shaped jags up and down so it wasn't an even line
you might be able to get the same effect by gathering or loosely pleating the fabric and binding the coat just above where you want the dye to reach
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 28 September 2007 15:14 (eighteen years ago)
Yes, that's the kind of know-how I needed. :D
― Laurel, Friday, 28 September 2007 15:16 (eighteen years ago)
So I don't want to sound like I'm lamenting the loss of any sort or regional fashion, because I'm not sure that's even the case -- But upon seeing so many similar looks photographed on people from in different cities and countires and continents: Do you think that more people are adopting the "street style" look because of reading the blogs? Or do these fashion bloggers exclusively favor / photograph people with this style?
Discus.
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 28 September 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)
maybe it goes around more because.. culture in general being more globalized? there is an h&m everywhere.. maybe "fashionable" is a subculture itself
― daria-g, Friday, 28 September 2007 20:46 (eighteen years ago)
can we continue to agitate for I Got Style ?
― jergïns, Friday, 28 September 2007 20:48 (eighteen years ago)
uniqlo jeans are cheap too. if I'm not careful my whole wardrobe will be from there :/
― dmr, Friday, 28 September 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)
WANT
― quincie, Saturday, 29 September 2007 16:44 (eighteen years ago)
yeah, uniqlo is good value. the jeans top out at 59.50. i think the basic straight-leg style is 39.50, which is as cheap as old navy, and they look much nicer.
― lauren, Saturday, 29 September 2007 17:32 (eighteen years ago)
i'm digging this
http://bp0.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/Rv5D243lnQI/AAAAAAAADyw/a2M3DC1xi58/s1600/R0095810.jpg
― rrrobyn, Sunday, 30 September 2007 20:00 (eighteen years ago)
this is what i'm digging
― rrrobyn, Sunday, 30 September 2007 20:07 (eighteen years ago)
ilx and images... sometimes work sometimes not work sometimes sometimes work/notwork
http://bp0.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/RwC3BsWAbDI/AAAAAAAAD04/PGly5UnsP24/s1600-h/R0096391.jpg
RONG.
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:41 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp0.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/RwC3BsWAbCI/AAAAAAAAD0w/wqOt28uy64M/s1600-h/R0096305.jpg
damnit. ^^^both of these are RONG.
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 1 October 2007 14:42 (eighteen years ago)
http://i23.tinypic.com/ftisf5.jpg balmain s/s 08
― daria-g, Monday, 1 October 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)
i really like that dye, but i don't really understand the applique bits...?
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 1 October 2007 15:20 (eighteen years ago)
i am glad you were not calling me RONG, a, but calling non-appearing images wrong. but yeah those styles are pretty out there, but if it makes them happy, why not
i am not sure about the tye-dye dress
― rrrobyn, Monday, 1 October 2007 17:13 (eighteen years ago)
sorry guys that dress is straight up hideous
― bell_labs, Monday, 1 October 2007 17:18 (eighteen years ago)
the billowy tiered gown and the athletic fit on the bust makes it seem really like something you'd find at a resort boutique, which is not improved at all by tie-dye. and then the big metallic flowers are like WHAT?
i still maintain that the dye is beautiful, it was just used on the wrong garment is all.
rrr, i would never be so rude as to RONG you :D -- that knit (or is that a printed knit pattern?) hoodie minidress is pretty wild but i am confused that there seems to be ear slits in the hood?
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 1 October 2007 17:50 (eighteen years ago)
i just recently had a c. 1980 blue Pan Am flight bag, which I have been using for the past 6 months or so, stolen from my car a couple weeks ago (along with everything else in the car). Now I see Marc Jacobs has released just such an Pan Am flight bag, and I am filled with insensible angst and bitterness. MARC JACOBS STOLE MY LOOK. FUCKER.
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 01:00 (eighteen years ago)
I am more upset about having the bag stolen -- it was inherited from family and was hell of classy. But I feel better channeling that anger towards Marc Jacobs.
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 01:01 (eighteen years ago)
:( agh thieves! that sucks so much :( i like marc jacobs but i support your temporary anger towards him in this case
i have not looked at any street style today (my eyes are burning with computer screen staring b/c i am being a person who gets work donnnne. ow.)
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 02:27 (eighteen years ago)
I like the balmain dress but maybe i give it a break for being in paris, if they showed in in LA i'd be like.. no
http://www.style.com/slideshows/fashionshows/S2008RTW/BALMAIN/RUNWAY/00330m.jpg i like this too
― daria-g, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 04:30 (eighteen years ago)
Is the uppermost silvery part made of tiny strands, or is it actual silver material?
― roxymuzak, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 04:31 (eighteen years ago)
so awesome
http://bp3.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/RwAHad-8PZI/AAAAAAAACMU/K9PmN2Zwthg/s1600-h/ROredgrnw.jpg pic link
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 03:58 (eighteen years ago)
i think i want to be her
Beautiful! There is something weird going on with the bottom of her blazer, though, yes?
There is a lot of awesome red hair on this thread!
― roxymuzak, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 04:26 (eighteen years ago)
yeah her blazer has a bit of an old but washed teddy bear look about it but her i like the imperfection or whatever - street style!
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 11:27 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp0.blogger.com/_3lEWkRDQ96E/RpqXNYjXcvI/AAAAAAAABoI/dSYIKLSoWIY/s400/bermuda.jpg
http://bp1.blogger.com/_3lEWkRDQ96E/RpvtPYjXcwI/AAAAAAAABoQ/V1H5iHFPII4/s400/lace.jpg
Are black sheer tights + awful shorts becoming popular in London?
― roxymuzak, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)
I like the girl on the right.
http://www.oslostil.com/diaryphotos/51.jpg
― roxymuzak, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 17:36 (eighteen years ago)
Aww awww awwwwwwwwwwww okay so they're basically dressed like indie teenage cut-outs, but there's...some kind of restraint to it, it's not especially showy, and it's not masking their basic sweetness at all. AWWWWWWWWWWwwwww
― Laurel, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 17:38 (eighteen years ago)
OTM
― roxymuzak, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 17:40 (eighteen years ago)
I think I want to be in their girl gang.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 17:46 (eighteen years ago)
Better get something checked red and black!
― roxymuzak, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 17:50 (eighteen years ago)
I wear red, white, and black about four days a week already. :) The other colors have to compete for the remaining three days.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 17:51 (eighteen years ago)
Those were my high school colors, or else I'd probably do the same thing! I had to drop the red for blue in school or risk being seen as someone with school spirit.
― roxymuzak, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 17:54 (eighteen years ago)
...risk being seen as someone with school spirit shot dead in gang violence.
NB - I am very pleased to say that this doesn't actually reflect my high school experience, although it was of course utterly miserable in other ways.
― Oilyrags, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 17:57 (eighteen years ago)
(Ppppsssst rox, they were my school colors, too! I like to think I've grown past that barrier these days, because the colors are just so great, but it did take me quite a long separation to come around.)
― Laurel, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 17:59 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, I feel you on the not caring about school colors anymore tip, but I still have a lot of clothes from that time, fortunately/unfortunately! Still trying to expand into more color.
― roxymuzak, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 18:01 (eighteen years ago)
i was kind of thankful for purple and gold. no risk of school spirit
― jergïns, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 18:02 (eighteen years ago)
I didn't ever really have a problem with my school colors -- navy blue & white -- but I still have an allergic reaction to the private school boy nazy blazer / blue oxford / yellow necktie / khakis look.
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 18:11 (eighteen years ago)
That's okay, elmo, you're a little old for schoolboys anyway.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 18:14 (eighteen years ago)
Man, I love that look!
― roxymuzak, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 18:21 (eighteen years ago)
shorts with black tights look is fucking ridiculous and unflattering. maybe if it were punk but those looks are not. i don't care if you're riding a bike and it's kinda cold. wear a skirt and put some biking shorts or leggings on and then take them off when you get to yr destination. i do this all the time; it is not hard.
those girls are adorable tho
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 23:09 (eighteen years ago)
Hur hur hur hur hur sorry sorry sorry...
― kv_nol, Thursday, 4 October 2007 08:51 (eighteen years ago)
It really depends on the shorts Rrobyn - I have some grey ones with a faint charcoal check on them that are made to be worn with tights. But they need to be thick tights and they need to be the right shorts. And it helps if you're not a Sloany idiot like the women above.
It is still kind of popular in London, although it was more so last year, and most people look pretty good, but they've picked the two worst examples ever up there.
― Anna, Thursday, 4 October 2007 10:58 (eighteen years ago)
No one looks good in shorts and tights. They are always despicable people as well.
― Raw Patrick, Thursday, 4 October 2007 11:30 (eighteen years ago)
No, I'm actually quite nice.
― Anna, Thursday, 4 October 2007 11:32 (eighteen years ago)
I can picture that particular kind of shorts/tights combo looking good, Anna. I think a lot is dependent on what it's paired with, shoes especially.
What is "Sloany"?
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 4 October 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sloane_Ranger
― lauren, Thursday, 4 October 2007 15:31 (eighteen years ago)
I don't find the khaki shorts horrible in and of themselves, at least she's got the skinny skinny legs for it, if you MUST take up the style -- it's her white sneakers and stupid boy's blazer that ruin everything. She looks like tennis/health club staff on a rain-day. The bloomers in the second photo, though, are so horrible that I'm embarrassed for the wearer from thousands of miles away.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 15:31 (eighteen years ago)
Actually the fact that she's standing next to a bread stand and in front of a bunch of event crew-ish people suggests that she's one of the catering servers.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 15:33 (eighteen years ago)
I'm cranky today, give me someone else to tear apart. Eventually I'll start condemning people to painful ends for the color of their shoe-laces and it will become funny even to me.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 15:34 (eighteen years ago)
Today, I am wearing a black & white plaid shirt with a white necktie. Feel free to comment on that, plenty of people already have. :/
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 4 October 2007 15:39 (eighteen years ago)
More skank backlash?
http://bp3.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/RwNqAsWAbWI/AAAAAAAAD3Q/Mf694MMbWL8/s400/R0096788.jpg
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 4 October 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp1.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/RwNqwMWAbcI/AAAAAAAAD4A/51Pctozb2fs/s400/R0096902.jpg
both from fashion week
The first one is obv one of the Furies, walking among mortals in disguise.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 15:54 (eighteen years ago)
Still in love with the Red Baron look upthread.
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 4 October 2007 15:57 (eighteen years ago)
wait, is the Mall Goth look considered high fashion now? she could be a juggalette.
i like the blue head scarf, but i think i might like the photo more than i do the look.
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:08 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp2.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/Rv5E8Y3lnSI/AAAAAAAADzA/NpUf5BtKO_0/s400/R0095937.jpg
more grey sox
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:12 (eighteen years ago)
Like color scheme with hr hair and makeup, but overall a mixed bag of feelings.
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:13 (eighteen years ago)
I've been cruising the fashion blogs and have discovered that I despise Style Arena, Street Fancy, and the Face Hunter, and I'm in serious doubt about Altamira NYC's eyesight decline. Sartorialist really IS the only one who's interested in anyone over 23.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:16 (eighteen years ago)
Elmo, is your shirt long or short-sleeved?
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:17 (eighteen years ago)
Rox, it is long sleeved, tucked in. Also, straight leg jeans, cuffed, and black combat boots.
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:21 (eighteen years ago)
I say cute (as long as the tie is not shiny).
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:22 (eighteen years ago)
The problem with most street style blogs is that they are blogs (i.e. they thrive for about a week then die, or are only sporadically updated)
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:23 (eighteen years ago)
does anyone know of a good place to find cute tights/stockings in nyc? i saw someone wearing some wooly-grey latticework pattern tights the other day and want them, or something similar.
and don't say wolford cos i get runs too frequently to buy fucking $60 stockings.
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:23 (eighteen years ago)
You should order online!
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:24 (eighteen years ago)
from where? LINKS PLS!
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:26 (eighteen years ago)
Sock Dreams! Also stockingirl.com is one of my favorites.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:27 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.sock-dreams.com/
www.stockingirl.com is probably not work-safe, though.
I think the first shorts-tights woman would look OK, if you chopped off her head. Her clothes are OK. Love the shocking blue shirt.
― czn, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:28 (eighteen years ago)
> I think the first shorts-tights woman would look OK, if you chopped off her head.
And to think they say fashion-conscious people tend to be shallow and judgemental!
― Oilyrags, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:31 (eighteen years ago)
dkny tights have good colors and patterns, and they're pretty durable. nordstrom's own-brand tights are great - sturdy, very opaque, nice colors (though they rotate). carey just got a big order from tabio. fantastic tights, but prices are in GBP so one pair are like $20. if you can handle st. mark's place, then check the sock man and the gross jersey alternagoth stores that sell "i fucke your boyfriend" t-shirts. you'd be suprised at the hosiery bounty contained therein.
― lauren, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:31 (eighteen years ago)
eh, both shorts/tights ladies are pretty busted. first one might just be a bad photo, though.
― lauren, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:32 (eighteen years ago)
also, the point of this thread is to be judgemental.
― lauren, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:34 (eighteen years ago)
marc jacobs, what did you do you do to yourself?
then:
http://www.fashtastic.net/images/mj.jpg http://cache.viewimages.com/xc/71865664.jpg?v=1&c=ViewImages&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF193875DCB1DD8387ABB8F64F0D00E14D47EA40A659CEC4C8CB6
now:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v369/colinohara/marcqueen.jpg
i mean, fine, he's probably sick of looking like yr hipster next door biting his style but did he really have to go for the all out scene queen, orange tan, diamond earrings et al?
― jed_, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:45 (eighteen years ago)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v369/colinohara/marcqueen2.jpg
― jed_, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:46 (eighteen years ago)
you really have to see this new spread in arena homme+ to appreciate how terrifying he looks.
― jed_, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:48 (eighteen years ago)
ript
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:49 (eighteen years ago)
i always thought that he was so cute. the new look makes me sad.
― lauren, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:51 (eighteen years ago)
I thought the point was the clothes, not the people in them.
― Oilyrags, Thursday, 4 October 2007 16:56 (eighteen years ago)
i can't really see how his new shoe idea is going to hold up either:
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/images/MK-AL810A_FASHB_20070911195326.jpg http://www.51fashion.com.cn/EditManager/UploadNews_02/2007-9/2007926141944704.jpg
i still think he rules though:
After the show, Mr. Jacobs had no apologies for those who thought his looks might be difficult to wear. "They're supposed to be -- nothing is for everyone," he said. "The only thing that is for everyone is Fruit of the Loom T-shirts. And, I mean, Fruit of the Loom did it so I don't need to do that, right?"
― jed_, Thursday, 4 October 2007 17:02 (eighteen years ago)
yeah, i can't see a mass adoption of the style. that said, if i had the money i'd have a pair in a heartbeat for display purposes.
― lauren, Thursday, 4 October 2007 17:03 (eighteen years ago)
I admire experimentation. Would never wear though, obv.
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 4 October 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)
Harem pants: WTF?? Seriously now, ladies.
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 4 October 2007 17:51 (eighteen years ago)
those marc jacobs mouse shoes kind of piss me off. i mean they would be fine on a twelve year old, but what twelve year old has $300 to spend on shoes? i think if i saw a grown woman wearing them i would get really angry.
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 17:55 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.jildorshoes.com/images/products/MarcJacobs674141BlkPony_Front_300.jpg talking about these
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 17:56 (eighteen years ago)
Those would be awesome with a really conservative pants suit.
― n/a, Thursday, 4 October 2007 17:57 (eighteen years ago)
The bases of those things would have to be made of TITANIUM to support anyone over 95 pounds.
― nabisco, Thursday, 4 October 2007 17:57 (eighteen years ago)
http://a6.vox.com/6a00c10e0f63c5d3b400c2251c26f6549d-pi these? these are awesome! :D
xpostss
― sleep, Thursday, 4 October 2007 17:59 (eighteen years ago)
So cute!
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:00 (eighteen years ago)
They're also too much to actually go with anything -- I feel like the only way they'd look good would be if you were otherwise practically naked.
― nabisco, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:00 (eighteen years ago)
he, he
― sleep, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:00 (eighteen years ago)
Those white ones with like a floaty minidress, would be awesome. The black: as said, with a suit.
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:01 (eighteen years ago)
they hurt my brain :( i would like them if they were $25 keds or something
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:01 (eighteen years ago)
my comments re: reverse heel, not mousefeet
(Peeps be liking mousefeet but hating on upthread Heidigirl, makes no sense)
― nabisco, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:01 (eighteen years ago)
diy mouse keds
― sleep, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:02 (eighteen years ago)
$300 mouse shoes with a suit would scream "I AM A FRIVILOUS WHIMSICAL RETARD, DO NOT TAKE MY IDEAS SERIOUSLY"
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:04 (eighteen years ago)
those mouse shoes are some chinatown bullshit.
― Yerac, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:07 (eighteen years ago)
zomg check out my sweet mouse hack
― dmr, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:08 (eighteen years ago)
lol
― sleep, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:11 (eighteen years ago)
those mice are kinda cute, but yeah, it would be hard to wear over the age of 32 without somehow looking like a desperately perimenopausal empty-nest headcase.
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:21 (eighteen years ago)
maybe if you had a coffee mug with an orange tabby on it, that would complete the look?
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp1.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/RwC3o8WAbGI/AAAAAAAAD1Q/HsRA0qTI__M/s1600-h/R0096492.jpg discus
― sleep, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:29 (eighteen years ago)
oops broken image i think? this: http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/2277/r0096492vp1.jpg
― sleep, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:31 (eighteen years ago)
re-purposed oversized shirt as a voluminous mini-dress, ok, i can understand that look. i don't think the sporty red & ivory stripe goes well with the rest of her outfit, though
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:35 (eighteen years ago)
$300 dollars is retarded for those shoes, but just the look of them does not bother me, is all i'm saying.
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:37 (eighteen years ago)
that's a sweater not a shirt. she looks really hot. good on her.
― jed_, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:39 (eighteen years ago)
i hope she doesn't have to walk home through the rape zone!
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:39 (eighteen years ago)
loathe the mouse shoe btw.
― jed_, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)
i can't believe i'm going to say this, but: too much leg
― jergïns, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:41 (eighteen years ago)
i dunno, i figure if we can see her bra through it, it's more likely to be a knit shirt rather than a sweater, no?
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:42 (eighteen years ago)
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1112/1436743787_3d5944d13f_o.jpg this lady likes tying things just below her boobs for some reason?
― Heave Ho, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:44 (eighteen years ago)
Reason: she wants to look pregnant?
― n/a, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:45 (eighteen years ago)
everytime i am an the east village i see lots of girls just wearing tights, no pants, and i gasp a little! it's fine, it's a "look", they just obviously don't have the problem of living in a rough neighborhood or riding the subway home at night. it's kinda like a disneyland for college kids. i'm not hating, but that would get you nothing but solicitations and sketchy dudes following you in most other places.
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:46 (eighteen years ago)
no, it's definitely a sweater.
― jed_, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:47 (eighteen years ago)
i mean the girl in the red and white is clearly some famous person (who?) with cars to take her around everywhere and she doesn't really have to worry about the fact that she is NOT WEARING PANTS. but i do!
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:48 (eighteen years ago)
which makes me sad. i hate pants too ;_;
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:50 (eighteen years ago)
xpost - dudes, that is (a) closer to where waists actually are than the average pair of jeans, (b) a lot more flattering than muffin-topping, and (c) appealing if yr gettin all booby with it
― nabisco, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:50 (eighteen years ago)
re the red & white: It's a sweater, and she should have whip-stitched the breast pocket shut because it's sagging like a wet newspaper and making the stripes veer off in the general direction of "homeless wino".
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:51 (eighteen years ago)
nothing wrong with a belt under the bosom in that picture. i'm not sure where else it would go, really, in this case. big problem with the outfit as i see is the shirt under the dress and the too-long skinny jeans. she looks all bunchy.
― lauren, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:53 (eighteen years ago)
I despise the no-pants look as a "look" the most when the "top" being worn as a "dress" has a gathered waistband, like the ribbing on that sweater. I'd prefer a tunic or even men's shirt-tails to a waistband masquerading as a hem. Or just get one black tube skirt, you pasty trollop.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:55 (eighteen years ago)
yeah. that is probably a case of TOO MUCH pants. her shirt/dress is actually long enough that she could have skipped them.
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:56 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, see, gathered dress lady is one person who SHOULD have just put nylons under her dress! I'm okay with the belt, I like it more than the majority of those sack dresses, and her sensible shoes are so Euro they quite win me over...but it'd be nicer around the hips & stomach & ankles without those bunchy pants, if that's what they are.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:57 (eighteen years ago)
I can't stand the whole I-am-wearing-a-dress-with-jeans-under-it thing
― dmr, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:58 (eighteen years ago)
Also her stare is very harsh and her eyes seem too light for her brows -- I think if I went to meet friends and someone had brought her along, I wouldn't be able to stop looking at her all night b/c of her stare, serious mouth, and coloring alone. But in a good way.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 18:58 (eighteen years ago)
i wear jeans under dresses sometimes, if they are indecently short or it's cold out or i'm running errands :/
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:01 (eighteen years ago)
mmm pasty trollops
― nabisco, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:01 (eighteen years ago)
i like the shoes on the belt/pants girl.
laurel which one are you talking about?
lindsay/lauren, that's leigh right? sure looks like her.
― dan selzer, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:02 (eighteen years ago)
totally.
― lauren, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:03 (eighteen years ago)
we knew her when she was in converse.
i think so. i don't really know her though! i was never a misshapes goer.
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:04 (eighteen years ago)
me neither!
― lauren, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:05 (eighteen years ago)
i met her at michael's house once, i think. but she looked...different. kind of mousey. is she just really photogenic?
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:05 (eighteen years ago)
v pretty and yes - vv photogenic. total radical style overhaul, though.
― lauren, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:06 (eighteen years ago)
re the stare and mouth, I meant the fair-haired one, Linds -- the one with the belted dress on. The dark-haired sweater wearer looks like about 6000 other people in New York, she's pretty and obv has amazing legs but...not interesting to me.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:08 (eighteen years ago)
kind of mousey
well have I got the shoe for her
― dmr, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:08 (eighteen years ago)
wakka wakka
― lauren, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:09 (eighteen years ago)
since when do sweaters have chest pockets? it still looks like a shirt to me!
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:10 (eighteen years ago)
this thread is making me think a little more seriously about what i put on in the morning
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:11 (eighteen years ago)
Hahaha. Can I complain about the mouse shoes for a second? I have a personal vow never to buy sling-backs without a real buckle. To me they just look cheap and unfinished, like the shoemaker & designer conspired to cut costs. Which is fine...AT PAYLESS.
Elmo, it's a men's "dress" sweater! How is that hard to see?? Shirts don't have knit-in ribbed waistbands.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:12 (eighteen years ago)
lindsay...there was a time prior to misshapes, Leigh and Michael actually dj'd upstairs at Lit for a while. I think she took over from Jeralyn or vice versa. Maybe that was one of the periods when Amy and Michael weren't talking. I figured you would've known her.
Jeez, what is this, Gossip Girl?
― dan selzer, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:14 (eighteen years ago)
Art, life, etc.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:15 (eighteen years ago)
Calling GG "art" is a stretch, of course, but then so is calling NYC night-clubbing "life".
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:16 (eighteen years ago)
discus - cardigan: http://bp0.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/RwAG_t-8PYI/AAAAAAAACMM/tN6ZQlQXxAU/s400/Bcardiew.jpg
discus - how much better this would look without whatever is on her head / in her hair: http://bp3.blogger.com/_kqtCX8rtWOI/RvGIgQBrSNI/AAAAAAAABMk/ZKp6jUvWHu8/s400/CIMG1470.JPG
discus - the idea that men can, like women, wear shirts that are longer than their jackets, and how any argument in favor of this concept is severely challenged by this guy: http://www.copenhagenstreetstyle.dk/wp-content/2007/10/021007_love_small.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:19 (eighteen years ago)
discus - YES, actually: http://www.copenhagenstreetstyle.dk/wp-content/2007/09/060907_rebecca_small.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:20 (eighteen years ago)
that girl should just have her hair straight down
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:20 (eighteen years ago)
DAN, i may have met her a few times in a passing introduction kind of way, but i don't think i've ever had a conversation with the girl.
also, DID YOU KNOW, michael and justine have a dj night at black & white now on the SAME NIGHT as dazzle ships, omg drama!
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:21 (eighteen years ago)
The guy in the flight jacket appears to be smoking hot, but apart from that...no.
xp Michael and Justine ain't got no Dan Selzer.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:22 (eighteen years ago)
Seriously, are there any circumstances in which a man can wear a shirt longer than his jacket? I can think of a few situations where you can get away with like an inch or two of difference, but for whatever reason it's impossible as a thing to do.
― nabisco, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:25 (eighteen years ago)
haha Laurel has predictable taste in dudes!
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:25 (eighteen years ago)
fine it's a sweater. an ugly, stupid sweater. bah. xxxpost
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:25 (eighteen years ago)
I can't think of anything that you want hanging out of a zipped-up waistband, at all! Even if it's just a hoodie, I hate the plastic-bag gathered effect of the shirt underneath flaring out of the tighter waist. Flight jackets/Harringtons/etc really need to cover what is underneath.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)
he looks really polish, actually. like one of the guys clustered outside the bar by my apartment.
xpost re: long shirt dude
― lauren, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)
It's true, when I am in Greenpoint I hardly know where to look. Lucksmiths show at Europa would have given me whiplash were it not for the v unfortunate Euro disco tendencies of the assembled company.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:30 (eighteen years ago)
my current shirt is longer than my current jacket, i will get someone to take a picture of me on a street or something and post it here so you eat your words!
of course that's because i am a gangly fellow and also cheap.
― Will M., Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:31 (eighteen years ago)
not only is that dudes shirt coming out from under his jacket, his t-shirt is coming out from under his shirt. by like a foot.
― dmr, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:33 (eighteen years ago)
I was not fully aware of this shirt / jacket length proscription, but I will sometimes wear a oxford untucked under a sport coat -- i don't think a little length in the front is horrible if the jacket is left open. tails hanging out the back are bad, tho.
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:34 (eighteen years ago)
laurel, when i see guys like that i imagine them at the end of the night, red-faced and shouting abuse at anyone who doesn't look aryan. knee-jerk reaction, i know, but not totally baseless.
― lauren, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:35 (eighteen years ago)
is this thread going to turn into a "what are you wearing today" so we can have bitchy "ooh get her" sneering contests? (secret hope.)
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:36 (eighteen years ago)
Oh, my dislike doesn't apply to suit jackets or loose hems, just to clingy waistbands that gather up the underlayer and turn it into a tutu.
Lauren, I'm sure you are so, so right, it's just that in my experience they end up red-faced shouting at the televion at whomever let the last three goals through...which is a little pathetic but at least not revolting. But I'll take your advice and see if that helps....
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:38 (eighteen years ago)
(to clarify, i'm talking abt the polish version of those guys.)
― lauren, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:39 (eighteen years ago)
The point is, I could totally help him with that layering problem.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)
you just want to tuck his shirt in for him
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)
i think she wants to remove it entirely!
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:43 (eighteen years ago)
The man in the cardigan, well...I don't have anything in particular to complain about! I don't actively like the sweater but really I think he's just a dude wearing a sweater, going about his day. Apart from the styley hair he's pretty low-key looking. I'm pretty sure it's a women's sweater, though.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:45 (eighteen years ago)
xp :D
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:47 (eighteen years ago)
ugh i hate non-opaque black tights under short non-dresses. It looks like she just got off work as the udnderstudy in Cabaret. And even though she is totally thin it makes it look like you are stretching out the top of the thigh part.
― Yerac, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:49 (eighteen years ago)
I thought it was a woman's sweater, too, but look what side the buttons are on.
I'm surprised, no comments on the girl in the high gray pants. Either it's not loading fast enough, or she just has the kind of hair, face, and glasses that make everyone run with it. (I think my 100% YES reaction has to do with how she looks very casual and almost ratty in it, like she's not trying to pull anything off.)
― nabisco, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:55 (eighteen years ago)
I hate her whole look, but I realize that it's a look and overall she's probably doing quite a good job at it, too. I just hate it hate it.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:57 (eighteen years ago)
she just has a very european/til'tuesday minus the rat tail thing going on.
― Yerac, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:58 (eighteen years ago)
she looks like an adrian tomine comic book character of some militant chick that annoyed him by giving him too many flyers to a rally.
― Yerac, Thursday, 4 October 2007 19:59 (eighteen years ago)
but then he learned to love her and they had awkward sex.
― Yerac, Thursday, 4 October 2007 20:00 (eighteen years ago)
luckily it's a big city with millions of people. Actually, I think they're doing every other wed, whearas Dazzle Ships is one wed a month, scheduled around whatever various other things, and if I thought the same people were having trouble deciding which party to go to, or thought that anyone who'd go to their party would normally come to ours I would make sure DS wasn't on the same wed as theirs, but since the only people who come to our party are a few cosmic disco bloggers, 3 of our friends, the occasional noize boarder, my girlfriend and even my sister, I don't think it's too big an issue.
― dan selzer, Thursday, 4 October 2007 20:00 (eighteen years ago)
Looks Laurel approves of: dudes, ordinary teenage girls at the mall
― nabisco, Thursday, 4 October 2007 20:04 (eighteen years ago)
When I made my comment re: suit jacket lengths and whatnot, that pic was not loading for me, so I was out of my element & like a child etc. and now that I see that pic, dude is dressed revoltingly :(
― Will M., Thursday, 4 October 2007 20:05 (eighteen years ago)
yeah i was joking about 'drama'! their night was low-key too. at least it was until 11pm when i went home to go to sleep cos i can't stay out late on work nights anymore ;_;
― bell_labs, Thursday, 4 October 2007 20:05 (eighteen years ago)
xxp Watch it, buddy, I've been known to approve of your look, too.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)
Hey, I posted red-headed bike hottie with great glee and rejoicing! And I've been trolling blogs for two days to find people I liked for this thread...but I hate everyone the photogs apparently like.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 20:12 (eighteen years ago)
I'd like to stuff the thread with pics of my friend Coco but I don't have any.
― Laurel, Thursday, 4 October 2007 20:14 (eighteen years ago)
oh good lord there is a fashion blog for 2nd Life
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 4 October 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)
If the highwaisted girl were anyone else, it would be an immediate dud, but as it is, it's just kind of a slow burn.
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 4 October 2007 21:54 (eighteen years ago)
-- Laurel, Thursday, October 4, 2007 7:22 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Link
qft
― jed_, Thursday, 4 October 2007 22:08 (eighteen years ago)
Okay, so, I can't find these individual images, but here:
http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e66/LimitedLiabilityGirl/street.jpg
The lower right corner in the red tights w/ red umbrella is KNOCKING ME O UT. That's a great look, in my mind. Ditto the turbaned Cossack to her left. And the top two aren't bad either -- all four are city-worthy looks that could go to the office, to work functions, to dinner, to parties, and always be visually notable. I just wish I could enlarge them each for detail, but the hunt continues....
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:08 (eighteen years ago)
i admire women who can pull of red tights. she looks great! i like both bottom ones. the top left is a weird combo of sloppy shirt and business wear, i.e. how i was dressed on wednesday when i overslept and had a meeting. and i am confused about the bows around the boots on the top right!
― bell_labs, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:15 (eighteen years ago)
the bottom right is great and was, i think, from hel-looks. maybe it's on some finland thread? nabisco should remember, i'm sure he posted it first.
― jed_, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:15 (eighteen years ago)
i had actually saved it to my comp to email to a friend so i just stuck it up on my photobucket.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v369/colinohara/unknown.jpg
― jed_, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:18 (eighteen years ago)
oooh i love her gloves and umbrella.
― bell_labs, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:19 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, the upper left is a pseudo-preppy joke, I only barely like it because it falls on the "Last Days of Disco"/hunt club side of the '80s revival, rather than the neon/stretch pants side.
xp OHHHH I love her! How DID she match all those shades of red?!
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:21 (eighteen years ago)
now that I think of it, someone could easily start a Providence street fashion blog. There are enough trendy yupsters, monied ivy leaguers, and coked-out art-school students to make it visually interesting. i'm not gonna, tho.
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:21 (eighteen years ago)
i'm glad someone revived this so i don't have to wallow in penis envy over on that "boner city" thread anymore! though it does increase the chances of me going shopping after work :/
― bell_labs, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:21 (eighteen years ago)
anyhow, another stunning redhead:
http://stockholm.youcatwalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/159_clara.jpg
hate those shoes with the nylons
― bell_labs, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)
ALSO: anyone care to comment on the ubiquity of the rolled-up cuff on men's jeans & pants? i'm not sure i like it.
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)
xp Hmmm further proof that I should really have a trench coat of some sort. They never FIT, though....
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:24 (eighteen years ago)
her coat and hair are the only things i like about that pic. ugh to the rest
― bell_labs, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:25 (eighteen years ago)
I like those shades of blue and yellow together, too. But you're right about the shoes, that's what's nixing the style for me.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:26 (eighteen years ago)
yeah, it's kind of like a commuting to work, keep my heels in the drawer look. which i sadly employ as well, but that doesn't mean it looks good!
― bell_labs, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:28 (eighteen years ago)
Elmo, the rolled-up jeans have too many different precedents for me to make any sweeping statements about them, I think...? There's the skinhead bootboy thing, the bike msgr thing, the '50s ducktail greaser thing...they go with different colors/fits and other signifiers. Or as always, obv, you could just do what you like. I'm not opposed to it at all as long as the proportions aren't screwy.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:30 (eighteen years ago)
lady in red accessories is AWESOME.
― lauren, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:32 (eighteen years ago)
the shoe/nylon combo might not be spot on but the sweater/jacket/whatever's under the sweater combo is priceless. (the redhead i mean). i can't get behind this trend of big rings with like... beryl on them or whatever the hell. but then again i am pretty anti-jewelery, possibly due to some autistic thing where i can't really stand shit like watches, necklaces, or rings on my body. but i relaly do find them gaudy.
re: cuffed jeans on dudes, i think this is classic atm, but that's only because I could NEVER EVER do this because I was too tall, until my friend brought me back some cheap mondays w/ 36" legs from sweden, which is like... the best thing. pants that fit. my god.
― Will M., Friday, 5 October 2007 18:33 (eighteen years ago)
I know there's a lot of precedent for cuffing jeans, but I'm referring more specifically to this rolled cuff:
http://www.copenhagenstreetstyle.dk/wp-content/2007/10/021007_love_small.jpg
i think it looks kinda sloppy
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:44 (eighteen years ago)
elmo, you are in prov? i didn't know that. yeah there should be a fashion blog esp at the RISD ball.. the outfits are unbelievable
the girl with the umbrella and pink tights is from hel-looks, she says she is wearing old curtains made into a skirt! I think she is from NYC though, not finnish. (I saved it too. from at least a year ago.)
― daria-g, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:50 (eighteen years ago)
errgh. the mens vogue one looks like an example of the "french cuff."
― lauren, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:51 (eighteen years ago)
It IS sloppy, it makes me think of little boys gone wading, or men in casual trousers worn dockside/at vacation house. I think the impression is one of having just left off from leisure/play. I don't dislike it, particularly.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 18:54 (eighteen years ago)
They're all summer pictures, is why. It works best on the guy with the sockless loafers, really; I wouldn't call that "sloppy" at all. But yes, generally leisurely, sockless, a preps-gone-boating feel.
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:02 (eighteen years ago)
very hot
― elan, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:11 (eighteen years ago)
as with any style component, yes, the rolled cuffs look best when they're appropriate to the entire look, worst when they are slavishly imitated for the sake of trendiness. a couple times i've seen this, it's been obviously a ploy to show off colorful hosiery.
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:12 (eighteen years ago)
yeah yeah, straight men have retarded taste in ladies' fashions, can we not repost that idiot's picture any more please?
― bell_labs, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:14 (eighteen years ago)
Hahah I was just going to say, "Ooh, get her!"
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:20 (eighteen years ago)
seriously, i'm in a crap mood and seeing her stupid smirk again just pushed me over the edge
― bell_labs, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:22 (eighteen years ago)
then again, if women ran with straight guys' tastes in fashion, they'd get to weigh 20 pounds more, not think as much about color-matching, and cut out 80% of handbag expenses
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:24 (eighteen years ago)
This may come as a shock, but I do not, in fact, get dressed for straight men. I mean, I hope they like it, but I don't generally expect them to notice whether my scarf is vintage or my shoes match my handbag or my stockings pick up a pattern that's also in my sweater trim.
The rest of the time I get dressed just to get out the door and not feel like too much of a loser. :)
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)
i dress for other women, it's true. if it were for the men it's be all no pants, all the time.
― bell_labs, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:29 (eighteen years ago)
dude, i don't think there's a straight man in the country who imagines that women are dressing to appeal to him. (this is why guys sometimes look confused whenever anyone suggests female beauty-standard and body-image crises have to do with their gazes.)
there's a split on either side, i think:
straight men = often like women to look cute and feminine and flighty, whereas many women would rather feel strong and competent and put-together
straight women = often like men to look strong and competent and put-together, whereas many men would rather feel as if they're too cool to care how they look
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:30 (eighteen years ago)
xpost - i'm surprised you'd say it's for other women, bell -- sure that's a big part of it, but i always feel like it's more about how you see yourself, or feel like presenting yourself. (which is, unsurprisingly, often in opposition to what the mainstream of the opposite sex might want from you.)
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:32 (eighteen years ago)
I'm...not sure straight male posters to this thread are at all representative of what the total male population likes...also the theory that men, in general, prefer unthreatening looking women makes me extremely prickly. So clearly I'm not an impartial weigher of options, here, but I'm almost positive there's a percentage of men who don't have negative feelings about women looking mature, collected, or powerful.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:34 (eighteen years ago)
true. my bf loves what he calls my "professional" clothes.
― lauren, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:36 (eighteen years ago)
almost positive there's a percentage
vs "men often like" etc etc
― sleep, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:38 (eighteen years ago)
hence all the "oftens" and "sometimes" in my breakdown -- just talking about what bell's pulling from this thread. i don't think anyone on this thread has any problem with women looking mature, but the things guys have liked that bell's groaned over have tended to be ... girlish and flighty-looking.
the idea is surely that how you represent yourself, fashion-wise, will be attractive to someone who likes precisely the qualities you're trying to project. this is why i go to work in a bunny suit.
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:38 (eighteen years ago)
Haha, Vic, fair enough. I'd just like to emphasize the other side of the spectrum, so it doesn't get overlooked by manipulation of semantics.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:39 (eighteen years ago)
-- nabisco, Friday, October 5, 2007 3:24 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
plz let this happen
― and what, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)
yeah i had an ex who was very in to office clothes. i think it was mostly because it was "exotic" to him, but at least he claimed that it was because he found competent, intelligent women attractive.
― bell_labs, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)
so like basically --
bell = groans over guys liking little-girlish dress-up outfits n/a = says dapper scarf-dudes look like douchebags and asks for MASCULINE style
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)
-- nabisco,
OMG run away with me.
― Abbott, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)
you has un fiance :(
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)
Re "masculine" style: I personally have a deep suspicion that the fear of looking like you give a shit about your appearance is pretty much exactly the same as being afraid of having to compete with anyone else in the world on a "grown-up" or "real world" level. Ie...time to grow up now, kids.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:48 (eighteen years ago)
Hm that sounds unnecessarily antagonistic...I should maybe clarify that I'm just holding the mens to the same standard as I do the laydees, which is to say that childhood is a lovely place and let's all remember it fondly...and dress our age.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:50 (eighteen years ago)
I have kind of started dressing like that, actually, nabitsuh! Today I am wearing some nubbly goldenrod wide-leg trousers, a tan cordouroy blazer w/suede elbow patches, and (outlier) some white tank to w/geometric tan/brown/yellow owls on it. Also big earrings of carved wooden leaves, prolly not in yr or Wooster's wardrobe.
― Abbott, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:50 (eighteen years ago)
ideally there is no reason a woman can't be a force to be reckoned with all week long and still throw on something girlish and whimsical now and then, with confidence
but then again i'm the guy who's pretty sure that heidi-girl from upthread could totally kick my ass, and anyone else's here too
xpost - I think you're largely wrong on that, actually, Laurel -- that's part of it, but the objections to fashion you get from straight guys tend to involve the terms "gay" or "douchebag," which suggests that lots of men think of attention to dress as somehow pretentious, trying-too-hard, thinking-you're-cool, or unmasculine
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:53 (eighteen years ago)
That wooden necklace was probably in Nora Charles's wardrobe, though, Abbott!!
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:54 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, but there's the weird thing where tough guys on the other side of the privilege line think it's really important to be ABLE to dress well if it's called for, that you SHOULD have suits and know how to wear them in whatever your chosen mode is, and be able to look really noteworthy on occasion. And nobody calls them fags to their faces, that's for sure.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:56 (eighteen years ago)
I mean, those guys aren't worrying about their masculinity while getting dressed, is what I'm saying.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:58 (eighteen years ago)
ie, the first tenet of mod: clean living in difficult circumstances.
― lauren, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:58 (eighteen years ago)
Laurel loves the mod boys, it is true.
xpost haha
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 5 October 2007 19:59 (eighteen years ago)
Ohhh it's true! But I was also thinking of the guido thing, actually, which I'm seeing as an offshoot of the perfectly respectable Old Italian attitude that a man should appear well in public, should cut a figure.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:02 (eighteen years ago)
Anyway I'm not completely opposed to whimsicality, I just ended up on this side of the argument because I somewhat prefer structure & tailoring & maturity in appearances. I've got silly trapeze dresses and little canvas flats and cardigans with the best (or the worst) of 'em! But I find that the styles championed here for women are OVERWHELMINGLY whimsical to the point of childishness, and that's what Lindsay and I are getting prickly about, really.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)
well sheah, wanting to stay slack is pretty middle-class and pretty our-aged; but i'd suggest that the kind of working-class thing you're talking about only exists in certain cultural groups, not all, and some of those cultural groups have different systems of trying to look good that wouldn't even be recognized on this thread
and i'm not talking about masculinity in the sexual sense, or being called a fag -- i'm talking about the sense a lot of dudes seem to have that putting loads of attention into dress is somehow bullshitty and makes you a tool, as opposed to some kind of no-bullshit bro who is comfortable and not trying anything
(interestingly enough i think it's guidos on club night -- not to mention the club girls -- who'd be the very first to tell you that their attention to dress is aimed squarely at the opposite sex, and the corresponding dudes-on-prowl and club-skank fashions the very first this thread would probably deem disastrous)
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:09 (eighteen years ago)
yeah, the woman with the red tights/umbrella is a good example of being creative and whimsical and GORGEOUS without looking like like 5 year old
― bell_labs, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:10 (eighteen years ago)
xpost -- if stuff here is OVERWHELMINGLY whimsical (which i really don't think it would be if you counted images posted), i'd guess that's because (a) sartorialist is the only blogger who tends to look for subtler styles, instead of just "wow look at that person on the street," and he can do that because he photographs people at fashion events; (b) a disproportionate number of pictures are from, umm, scandinavia; and (c) it's just more fun to post "zowee look at THIS outfit" than "nice collar on this jacket"
i can only think of like three images on this thread that constitute five-year-old-dom, and one of them was from a side-trip to a TWEE BLOG
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:12 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp2.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/Rv-VHd-8PWI/AAAAAAAACL8/wWXUyGAI4qY/s1600-h/GBSantAndrea.jpg
maybe points off for a boring bag, but other than that, she's pretty flawless. being gorgeous helps, of course, but this is still a fantastic outfit.
― lauren, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:16 (eighteen years ago)
It all depends on what your chosen aesthetic takes as its model, I guess. In large parts of the middle-class Midwest, at least, there's very little in the way of adult models to aspire to, fashion-wise. Why would you WANT to look like your dad, when chances are he dresses more like a toddler than toddlers of thirty years ago did? Dude, I wouldn't want to grow up to that, either! But uh...I didn't take my mother's model AT ALL, I went out and got my own, and that option is open to everyone.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:16 (eighteen years ago)
Hahahahha...and then I fought with my mother about it pretty much non-stop, because she HATED the fact that I wanted what had been considered dowdy in her time.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:19 (eighteen years ago)
xpost - plus compare with some ladiez enjoying boyish maroon-cardigan guy at top of thread and some dudez noting that he looks ripe for getting beaten up and/or mugged
xpost - hahaha this is like confirmation: great shoes on her, please add about 20 pounds, I don't get what's so bad about the bag -- I'm officially straight and retarded now
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:20 (eighteen years ago)
Anyway, Nabisco, I'm trying to find more pictures of things I *do* like to post here! I figure change comes from within, right...? :D I think I mostly got on this whole tangent mostly just because beautiful face/horrible-posture girl in stupid shoes reappeared.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:21 (eighteen years ago)
there's nothing bad about the bag. it's just a tad zzz. perfectly nice, though.
― lauren, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:21 (eighteen years ago)
umm dude i know! i have been wordily skirting the point that y'all are going off on a universe of alleged retarded straight guys just cause someone posted that picture again
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:23 (eighteen years ago)
a lot of guys did think that dumpy girl in the ugly brown cardigan was hot, though, which was so perplexing.
― lauren, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:25 (eighteen years ago)
and kind of disturbing.
xxp Yes, I'm aware of that. And I find the idolization of that girl just as infuriating/retarded as the first time around. :)
LAUREN, if I even start on that we will be here all day.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:26 (eighteen years ago)
haha this one! http://www.tapemix.org/a/212.jpg it just makes me laugh more than anything.
― bell_labs, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:27 (eighteen years ago)
discuss: how children's-book illustration twee brown-cardigan girl differs significantly from children'-book illustration twee maroon-cardigan boy
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:28 (eighteen years ago)
um kind of disturbing cos there is no way she is older than 14? like, she hasn't even gone thru puberty yet dudes!
― bell_labs, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:28 (eighteen years ago)
dudes finding this girl hot has v little to do w/her clothes
― jhøshea, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:30 (eighteen years ago)
i didn't like maroon cardigan guy either, did i?
― lauren, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:31 (eighteen years ago)
i don't remember maroon cardigan boy but i don't think i've found any of the guys posted hot.
― bell_labs, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:34 (eighteen years ago)
Are you serious, Nabisco? His is obviously a "look", it's got a ton of elements that dovetail together and complement each other and are clearly purposeful. And anyway, while it's stylistically sort of admirable that he pulled it all together, it's not my cup of tea at all.
The girl looks like a real girl-next-door of say the '50s who is TWELVE and not allowed to go to school dances yet. Her clothes don't appear to fit particularly well or have any stylistic merit on their own and the whole collection protests strenuously that she's not going for any particular effect. It's fine, if you're twelve and you're one of L'Engle's Austins, but it's not fashion.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:34 (eighteen years ago)
that redhead looks boring
― 69, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:34 (eighteen years ago)
first girl in white is way cuter
― 69, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:35 (eighteen years ago)
Then go start a "pictures of girls I want to fuk" thread, this one is for styling and styling commentary.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:37 (eighteen years ago)
actually this one is because i'm too lazy to actually check all the various style blogs, and wanted you people to collate them for me at no cost
umm i seriously don't recall anyone saying they thought twee-girl was HOT -- she looks like a cross between a belle and sebastian song and a cocker spaniel, which is more of a "cute" thing. also, laurel, i think your attempt at criticism just outlined why people like the outfit: looks like a real girl-next-door of say the '50s would seem to suggest it's actually pegging something quite well, wouldn't it
p.s. i'm not sure why we're assuming that photo is from the present -- it looks more like someone cropped her out of a boarding-school photo from early-80s northern england as an example of twee-to-the-max
p.p.s. average age of menarche is practically 12 now, and there is something WAY more disturbing about acting like finding someone's twee outfit cute means you want to fuck them; i don't want to fuck cocker spaniels, either
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:46 (eighteen years ago)
Wait a second, SEVERAL people said, or at least strongly implied, that they found her hot!!
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:49 (eighteen years ago)
omg Krakow is really cute.
http://cracowstreetfashion.blogspot.com/
― molly mummenschanz, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:50 (eighteen years ago)
http://mattancey.free.fr/minimi/paris/138.jpg http://mattancey.free.fr/minimi/paris/138.jpg http://mattancey.free.fr/minimi/paris/138.jpg
― jhøshea, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)
Also there have been several past discussions on other threads about how men and women view "cute" differently, and the consensus among men was that "cute" equals "I want to fuck her glasses off", I distinctly recall this. Buuut now we're out of the purview of this thread again.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)
- Dom made a pun from "horrible" to "hot-rible," which doesn't count, and anyway it's Dom
- Hurting said "this girl's uber-cuteness makes me want to do perverse things with her"
that's all i see
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:51 (eighteen years ago)
it's a great city.
none of the polish girls in my neighborhood dress like that - it's all skintight d&g knockoff jeans with heels.
― lauren, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:53 (eighteen years ago)
versus like 12 posts from women complaining about her, and 4 posts from guys saying she looks dumb
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:53 (eighteen years ago)
hello, manilla!
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1440/1057824909_9f66db78b4.jpg
― molly mummenschanz, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:53 (eighteen years ago)
ok fine, nabisco. I'M WRONG.
in other news, i really don't mind redhead kneesock girl at all.
― lauren, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)
-- lauren, Friday, October 5, 2007 3:16 PM (26 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
http://broadwayworld.com/photoops/pillowmanarrivals/jeff_goldblum.jpg
― deej, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:55 (eighteen years ago)
"hello manila" = why some guys think caring about clothes will leave them looking like tools
sorry, lauren, i'm not trying to be a dick about it, or anything! it just seems wrong to act like this thread is weighed down with guys into that sort of thing, when every girl who looks like that has been met with volumes of contempt from women and then like one guy saying "i think she looks cute"
i.e., MEOW
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 20:57 (eighteen years ago)
mr. manilla has a sweet jacket, and not many fellows can pull that off. white part of collar + white shoes = A+++
i would never attempt anything so audacious, but good for him for being so coordinating, ballsy and snazzy.
― molly mummenschanz, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:00 (eighteen years ago)
i can't quite figure out why the redhead with the socks bugs me sooo much. there are little things i hate about her outfit, but it is mostly just the insipid look on her face.
― bell_labs, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:01 (eighteen years ago)
also, i don't know if you guys have heard, but a nuclear-reactor explosion has turned Finland into a post-apocalyptic wasteland where roving Mad Max-style bicycle gangs of teenage girls compete for scarce resources and worship an ancient neon bear-god named Grungo:
http://hel-looks.com/photos/20070926_02.jpg
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:01 (eighteen years ago)
Oh please re Vicky Austin: she got onto a fashion blog in the first place, even if it was a twee one, and was considered notable enough to be reposted into this thread. Now under criticism people are going to back away from having found her likeable/attractive?
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:01 (eighteen years ago)
NOTABLE ENOUGH FOR CHICKS TO BITCH ABOUT HER FOR WEEKS AND WEEKS AND WEEKS, AS IF THE ORIGINAL POINT WEREN'T JUST "HOW TWEE IS THIS"
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:04 (eighteen years ago)
her mommy was a raver and her daddy was a crust punk
― bell_labs, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:05 (eighteen years ago)
re the finnish girl
it's like a cyber goth met rainbow brite.
― molly mummenschanz, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:07 (eighteen years ago)
i originally wasn't going to post finnish girl because, you know, not really fashion-relevant, but she's stuck in my head for days, and something about her seems like she's probably kind of awesome
p.s. laurel seriously go back upthread and read the order of shit
1. i post three pictures from twee blog without comment 2. several female posters are appalled, at length, by twee girl 3. two dudes go "huhuh looks good to me" 4. weeks later, laurel makes up alternate history about "under criticism," as if anyone said ANYTHING about her until the claws were turned
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:09 (eighteen years ago)
I think we'll all be happier if I just leave this thread, actually. Feel free to make this thread be about totally unwearable clothing for teenaged art students.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:11 (eighteen years ago)
because, you know, not really fashion-relevant
alternately, instead of leaving, you can find and post better stuff than the blogs have on offer, and not make up slanderous stories about twee girls :(
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:15 (eighteen years ago)
One of the reasons why I like the twee girl is just because I hardly ever see teenagers dressed like that. It's kind of refreshing. And the muted olive/brown scheme really works well for her.
― jaymc, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)
Yes, twee girl is cute because she does not look intimidating or threatening to anyone's masculinity. Well, I don't really find that "cute" or "attractive", so nevermind.
― molly mummenschanz, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:41 (eighteen years ago)
something about this thread suggests she's very threatening to some people's femininity, though
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:41 (eighteen years ago)
because she's not a good representative of being a strong, independent female? NABISCO OTM
― molly mummenschanz, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:43 (eighteen years ago)
http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4787/r0097168aw2.jpg i like how this person is dressed.
― sleep, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:45 (eighteen years ago)
she'd have to be strong and independent to wear that outfit around these parts, seeing as half a dozen people would go strongly, independently apeshit over the cut of her trousers
let's zing forever over whether a teenage girl's twee sweater is setting women back 40 years or not
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:50 (eighteen years ago)
okay.
or let's change topics
collars up are officially okay again? (still think they look dumb)
― jergïns, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:51 (eighteen years ago)
that's all you've got? really?
― molly mummenschanz, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:52 (eighteen years ago)
(sorry, i am enjoying being a dick about this point, since i was shocked by the sheer unprompted vehemence of her bashing -- i'll put it to bed now)
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:54 (eighteen years ago)
Okay, there is a point of put-together style where you just start to seem faintly EVIL:
http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/4686/1648/400/868042/MadPeacoat.jpg
Palate-cleanse with his opposite:
http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/4686/1648/400/593623/The%20Man.jpg
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 21:57 (eighteen years ago)
Oooookay, I'm back! Not for fashion, but just because the blind spot here is getting ridic.
Nabisco, saying you don't know why elevating someone helpless and vulnerable looking and little girlish on a style thread is offensive to strong women is like me saying that since there's no racism in middle-class America anymore I don't know why we can't just intelligently discuss nooses hung in trees from a historical point of view. I mean, come ON -- one is just as ridicuous as the other.
― Laurel, Friday, 5 October 2007 22:01 (eighteen years ago)
Ha ha. You think he looks evil, nabisco?
― Michael White, Friday, 5 October 2007 22:05 (eighteen years ago)
It's the hair that does it -- he looks he's about to play an SS officer in a movie.
("elevating")
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 22:07 (eighteen years ago)
crispen glover dude rocking the looped scarf, haven't seen much of that in a while
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 5 October 2007 22:15 (eighteen years ago)
Ha, I was thinking Crispin Glover, too.
― jaymc, Friday, 5 October 2007 22:17 (eighteen years ago)
I hate that loopy scarf style. It's a cop-out -- like you want to be seen wearing a scarf, but keep it as far from your neck as possible.
― nabisco, Friday, 5 October 2007 22:17 (eighteen years ago)
without that evil scarf knot, we could see the white of his shirt-front and maybe he would look a little less like a fascist.
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 5 October 2007 22:25 (eighteen years ago)
i think redhead girl looks more affected/studiously bored than vulnerable/helpless-looking (even if you consciously go for the helpless look, it means you're probably not helpless and guys with brains grok that, amirite?). she's wearing a dress that doesn't fit (neckline is inexplicable), mildly cartoonish tights and glasses (where's her tail?), and criminally ugly shoes, at least in context. she also doesn't get that black really doesn't look very good on fair redheads, unless maybe they can match its shininess.
16yo girl is silly, but i'm not sure how much it would take to lose the precious - she could maybe even get away with the top ensemble if she de-capri'd the pants and lost the barrette. don't mind me, tho, i'd probably put her in a hippie smock.
i think peacoatman looks alrite, despite the crispen hair and napoleon-hat popped collar (not sure it would look better down), but that probably just means he's not very fashiony.
― gabbneb, Friday, 5 October 2007 22:33 (eighteen years ago)
Horesfeathers. A scarf is primarily there to keep you from losing heat through your carotids and he has tight 'round his neck. He's working it perfectly. I love the hair but then I like 30's hairstyles.
― Michael White, Friday, 5 October 2007 22:42 (eighteen years ago)
her dress fits just fine, it's the tiny cropped swing jacket that makes it look a bit awkward. also, the shoes play v. nicely against the luster and tone of her hair
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 5 October 2007 22:44 (eighteen years ago)
also, it looks like she smokes american menthol cigarettes
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 5 October 2007 22:46 (eighteen years ago)
yeah, i'm assuming the jacket goes with the dress
― gabbneb, Friday, 5 October 2007 22:54 (eighteen years ago)
sleep otm. that guy looks great.
― lauren, Friday, 5 October 2007 23:39 (eighteen years ago)
yuppie has good shoes
― youn, Saturday, 6 October 2007 00:02 (eighteen years ago)
redhead's shoes and socks match nicely
― youn, Saturday, 6 October 2007 00:04 (eighteen years ago)
shoes might match her eyes - head to toe - put together
Aw, peoples, don't mock-a the twee cardigirl for looking young. She may not be all that young. It strikes a chord with me because I didn't start looking my age/los my baby fat until about two years ago. I was three weeks away from turning twenty in this picture:
http://www.mediafire.com/imageview.php?quickkey=8ttn52yxwzz&thumb=4
I was working as a reporter at the time, and once when I did this interview in a junior high I got asked where my hall pass was. *;_;* NOOOOO
― Abbott, Saturday, 6 October 2007 00:10 (eighteen years ago)
Oops:
http://www.mediafire.com/imgbnc.php/8acd699c43cd32f1eb440d09492cbf9b4g.jpg
― Abbott, Saturday, 6 October 2007 00:11 (eighteen years ago)
http://msnbcmedia4.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/071004/071004_swim_hmed_310a.hmedium.jpg omg so hottt
― bell_labs, Saturday, 6 October 2007 03:16 (eighteen years ago)
I also don't see anything wrong with having some degree of attraction to vulnerability, or even having some perverse sexual feelings. As it happens, the woman I married is my age, and she's pretty fucking strong and not especially cutesy or girlish.
― Hurting 2, Saturday, 6 October 2007 03:25 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/june06minors.JPG
― deej, Saturday, 6 October 2007 03:43 (eighteen years ago)
http://img106.imageshack.us/img106/6976/miamigirlmz0.th.jpg
― daria-g, Saturday, 6 October 2007 05:03 (eighteen years ago)
http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/4674/fashionhelsinkilt5.th.jpg
― daria-g, Saturday, 6 October 2007 05:05 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.acc.umu.se/%7Ezqad/cats/1174329819-405845156_65f77f70ef.t.jpg
― daria-g, Saturday, 6 October 2007 05:06 (eighteen years ago)
i'm talking about the sense a lot of dudes seem to have that putting loads of attention into dress is somehow bullshitty and makes you a tool, as opposed to some kind of no-bullshit bro who is comfortable and not trying anything
some dudes might feel this way about girls too (and vice versa?) - it's like, what are you compensating for/insecure about?
― gabbneb, Saturday, 6 October 2007 09:52 (eighteen years ago)
Careful attention to dress: http://bp1.blogger.com/_tOx3h6WIU8U/RtCf6FK31NI/AAAAAAAAAaw/RhorLZpa1CI/s1600-h/zach
― freewheel, Sunday, 7 October 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)
http://assets.madame.lefigaro.fr/images/photo_set_item/picture/000/038/159/5hum15/Ricci-RS8-0336.jpg
nina ricci - more dyes!
― daria-g, Sunday, 7 October 2007 17:34 (eighteen years ago)
clothes really do look better on the skinny. this is fact.
― Spinspin Sugah, Sunday, 7 October 2007 19:22 (eighteen years ago)
what the fuck happened to this thread while I was out
― roxymuzak, Sunday, 7 October 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)
what the fuck happened to marc jacobs http://www.elle.com/assets/image/2007/W41/100720071907062135.jpg
(awesome)
― daria-g, Sunday, 7 October 2007 23:50 (eighteen years ago)
Is he making some kind of statement with the orange tan/diamond earrings thing?
― roxymuzak, Sunday, 7 October 2007 23:55 (eighteen years ago)
-- Abbott,
Yeah Abbott, I looked younger than my age for a long time. I still get asked for ID sometimes, but now it's a cause for celebration. (I am 28 - and remember drinking age in the UK is 18.)
None of this is as bad as a girl I used to work with. She was a radio producer, flying home from Sri Lanka after making a documentary on the tsunami. She heard a stewardess behind her say something along the lines of "hello, this should help you enjoy the flight." Turned around expecting wine and was presented with a bag of crayons and a colouring book. She is quite small, but was also about six months shy of 30 at the time.
― Anna, Monday, 8 October 2007 13:32 (eighteen years ago)
Why are people posting catwalk pictures on a street fashion thread?
― n/a, Monday, 8 October 2007 13:48 (eighteen years ago)
are plaid shirts cool again? i reckon.
― max r, Monday, 8 October 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)
-- n/a, Monday, 8 October 2007 13:48 (28 minutes ago) Link
― sleep, Monday, 8 October 2007 14:17 (eighteen years ago)
I did it just to piss you off
― daria-g, Monday, 8 October 2007 14:18 (eighteen years ago)
Before I get called a thread Nazi or Hitler or Stalin whatever again, I just want to say that I am a fan of this thread as an examination of what people are actually wearing in the real world.
― n/a, Monday, 8 October 2007 14:20 (eighteen years ago)
true. but i think the lines get blurred a bit with people posting photos from street fashion blogs of people who are wearing stuff that's fantastical but are wearing it "in the real world." things like that nina ricci dress actually look totally reasonable and more "normal" in comparison.
― lauren, Monday, 8 October 2007 14:41 (eighteen years ago)
plus, the majority of street style pix lately on the popular blogs are fashion people at fashion week, which isn't really "street" in my opinion, it's people decked out in whatever designer they're about to go see.
― daria-g, Monday, 8 October 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)
marc jacobs looks like thom ford there. creepy.
ihttp://www.hel-looks.com/photos/20071006_02.jpg
― LaMonte, Monday, 8 October 2007 15:33 (eighteen years ago)
i love her: http://www.hel-looks.com/photos/20071006_02.jpg
― LaMonte, Monday, 8 October 2007 15:35 (eighteen years ago)
nice!
― lauren, Monday, 8 October 2007 15:37 (eighteen years ago)
A lot of the Fashion Weekers are students and design assistants and the like totally blagging their way into shows, and are actually as likely to be wearing Primark and Top Shop.
Am very surprised the thread has not started posting BoomBox shots.
― suzy, Monday, 8 October 2007 16:49 (eighteen years ago)
thumbs down on those boots
― jergïns, Monday, 8 October 2007 16:50 (eighteen years ago)
I like her, too, but I would prefer a different bag? I can't figure out why.
― roxymuzak, Monday, 8 October 2007 17:22 (eighteen years ago)
she would look better minus the bag AND the boots (possibly if you just photoshopped out everything below the bottom line of the coat, so she was just floating awesomely around like Orco from He-Man)
― nabisco, Monday, 8 October 2007 17:25 (eighteen years ago)
roxy, perhaps it's b/c both her jacket poncho thing and purse flare out at the bottom. there's lots of flare goin' on.
i don't mind it entirely.
i used to have boots like that in the 80s, but mine were WHITE. hot cha cha!
― molly mummenschanz, Monday, 8 October 2007 18:36 (eighteen years ago)
hate the boots, love the bag.
― Yerac, Monday, 8 October 2007 18:58 (eighteen years ago)
Molly, you are otm. Sometimes I have trouble diagnosing the exact problem even when I know what the problem area is.
― roxymuzak, Monday, 8 October 2007 19:15 (eighteen years ago)
http://stockholmstreetstyle.blogg.se/images/andreas_1168679328.jpg
― nabisco, Monday, 8 October 2007 20:56 (eighteen years ago)
yuck
― deej, Monday, 8 October 2007 20:58 (eighteen years ago)
nice housecoat, grandma
― Mr. Que, Monday, 8 October 2007 20:59 (eighteen years ago)
that coat is too big for him maybe? I don't know; the cut is weird and seems to give him womanly hips.
― horseshoe, Monday, 8 October 2007 20:59 (eighteen years ago)
Not ever with that bag, sir.
― roxymuzak, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:02 (eighteen years ago)
What would make that really, really work would be if there were pajama pants and fuzzy slippers at the bottom.
(Guy in my neighborhood who'd walk around in the mornings in a robe / pajamas / slippers, carrying coffee and the paper = style inspiration)
― nabisco, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:04 (eighteen years ago)
also his hair is nasty and he needs to dump the library tote bag. ban fauxshinista
― deej, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:04 (eighteen years ago)
That is awesome, nabisco.
― roxymuzak, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:05 (eighteen years ago)
I saw something similar to that in a Lucky Mag spread recently, though the coats had rounded collars and were meant for women. Anyway, my first thought was bath robe.
― KitCat, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:12 (eighteen years ago)
someone told me those bags are The Next Big Thing in berlin, and, hence, europe. i thought he was kidding!
― ☪, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:46 (eighteen years ago)
What, tote bags? Those are kind of the Previous Big Thing, around here, I think.
― nabisco, Monday, 8 October 2007 21:48 (eighteen years ago)
his trousers are too short
― daria-g, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 00:22 (eighteen years ago)
http://i209.photobucket.com/albums/bb277/hourphotobucket/paul.jpg
utah!
― daria-g, Tuesday, 9 October 2007 00:40 (eighteen years ago)
fuck casual: http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4686/1648/1600/120th-Street-Style.jpg
― LaMonte, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
i'm wearing a cardigan today, but it's a bulky tweed with a big rolled collar and leather elbow patches, so the look is more "underpaid associate professor" than anything else.
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 16:53 (eighteen years ago)
http://style.blogs.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/09/05/redskt.jpg
― LaMonte, Friday, 12 October 2007 22:34 (eighteen years ago)
nice! i saw a skirt that color at reiss.. can't afford :( i love the length and cut. where can i find one like that?
― daria-g, Friday, 12 October 2007 22:53 (eighteen years ago)
i'd prefer flats with that
― roxymuzak, Saturday, 13 October 2007 01:01 (eighteen years ago)
attn elmo http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/696/turtjeanswbb5.jpg
― sleep, Wednesday, 17 October 2007 14:27 (eighteen years ago)
cute! i really like how the solid colors and clean shapes of her outfit allow the tie-dye to actually look put-together and polished.
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 17 October 2007 14:32 (eighteen years ago)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2264/1585157871_ed6c2400a9.jpg
okay, i'm not all about this outfit, but good lord that is a fine fine looking man. plus, nice to see a guy photographed for street style who has masculine, rather than androgynous, proportions.
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 17 October 2007 14:54 (eighteen years ago)
guy on left is my flatmate, more importantly guy on right is his bestie http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j171/mdanielwalter/johnP1.jpg
Here is bestie again http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j171/mdanielwalter/JohnP2.jpg
He is a fashion designer. And he is serious.
― W4LTER, Thursday, 18 October 2007 05:10 (eighteen years ago)
:/
― W4LTER, Thursday, 18 October 2007 05:12 (eighteen years ago)
his website
― W4LTER, Thursday, 18 October 2007 05:14 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.eastchester.k12.ny.us/schools/Ms/teachers/burke/images/outsiders_000.jpg
― Jordan Sargent, Thursday, 18 October 2007 05:15 (eighteen years ago)
"bestie"?
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 18 October 2007 05:16 (eighteen years ago)
condescending term for best friend
― W4LTER, Thursday, 18 October 2007 05:17 (eighteen years ago)
Ha!!
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 18 October 2007 05:18 (eighteen years ago)
sadly, fashion designer bestie is pretty much wearing a variation of the hipster sleaze uniform i have seen far too often these days. the up-do is pretty heinous, tho.
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:30 (eighteen years ago)
BID NOW vintage 80's authentic leather coke-dealer jacket L@@K
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:31 (eighteen years ago)
Elmo, is yr hottie Joaquin Phoenix?
― Laurel, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:37 (eighteen years ago)
He was on the Stil in Berlin blog, I guess he is a fashion designer?
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:38 (eighteen years ago)
I was looking for a street fashion blog with pics of Chicago people and I found this pic:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/monicadimperio/1430337367/
I played a show with this dude's band on Saturday.
― n/a, Thursday, 18 October 2007 14:44 (eighteen years ago)
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1154/1430337367_985184571d.jpg
Not so much a fashion post as a "hey, small world" post.
dude's purse is ridiculous but i really like this poncho thing he's wearing. http://bp0.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/Rxc5E8WAd6I/AAAAAAAAELo/dSU2-zxHak0/s400/R0111452.jpg
― LaMonte, Thursday, 18 October 2007 21:13 (eighteen years ago)
the girl in the tie dye is agyness deyn, isn't it?
― daria-g, Thursday, 18 October 2007 21:15 (eighteen years ago)
Love the poncho!
― KitCat, Thursday, 18 October 2007 21:16 (eighteen years ago)
isn't agyness deyn blonde?
― LaMonte, Thursday, 18 October 2007 21:16 (eighteen years ago)
those circle bags are a huge WTF, they always look like a craft project
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 18 October 2007 21:30 (eighteen years ago)
it looks like he's carrying a shield.
― molly mummenschanz, Thursday, 18 October 2007 21:32 (eighteen years ago)
Blame those bags on As Four, the disgustingly bad fashion designers who haunt the Lower East Side.
― Andi Mags, Thursday, 18 October 2007 23:34 (eighteen years ago)
yes, deyn is blonde but i am pretty sure she dyed it brown for paris fashion week. i really do think that's her
― daria-g, Friday, 19 October 2007 01:36 (eighteen years ago)
hi, who is this woman and where can i meet her so we can commence with making many pale, lanky, near-sighted babies??
http://www.tapemix.org/a/175.jpg
― chicago kevin, Friday, 19 October 2007 01:44 (eighteen years ago)
Did anyone check out the dude I was talking about upthread's website? I'd be interested to see what you guyz think (as I have no idea about fashioning).
It seems pretty bland tho. Plus the models look pretty ridic.
― W4LTER, Friday, 19 October 2007 01:47 (eighteen years ago)
..the guy I was referring to as "bestie".
My guess, Kevin: American Apparel
― nabisco, Friday, 19 October 2007 01:48 (eighteen years ago)
ok, i'm off to milwaukee avenue then...
― chicago kevin, Friday, 19 October 2007 01:56 (eighteen years ago)
oh wait, they have a couple different chicago stores...
dudes i totally bought all street style clothes today
― rrrobyn, Friday, 19 October 2007 02:29 (eighteen years ago)
new jeans for the first time in 5 years
like hte kids are wearing
bright orange tshirt with things on it
bright blue/turquoise/etc plaid shirt in elmo a style but girlie, like with minor ruffles even (did try on a men's real cowboy shirt in size small but it wasn't bright enough for me tho was into its look, will continue search)
― rrrobyn, Friday, 19 October 2007 02:31 (eighteen years ago)
long black cool-brand tshirt, half-off, weird designs on upper chest and upper ack in gold/beige
pics at some point i guess
could not deal with shoe shopping today though but did covet stupidly high heels i have no business thinking about (shiny shiny patent black or gold, w/ mirrored like 4" heel but cuet)
― rrrobyn, Friday, 19 October 2007 02:34 (eighteen years ago)
lol 'upper ack' 'back' obv
also how are lulu 1emon yoga pants so expensive?? i had been avoiding these stores and then i went into one and whoa. also: not street
― rrrobyn, Friday, 19 October 2007 02:38 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp3.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/RxNn6t-8P4I/AAAAAAAACQM/H4BUEsshcrI/s400/LondonGent.jpg
― LaMonte, Friday, 19 October 2007 02:41 (eighteen years ago)
garden gnome chic?
― chicago kevin, Friday, 19 October 2007 02:42 (eighteen years ago)
YES.
― LaMonte, Friday, 19 October 2007 02:43 (eighteen years ago)
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e239/allocryptic/JWffw.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 19 October 2007 13:18 (eighteen years ago)
shi tzu wedge heels? ok!
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 19 October 2007 13:21 (eighteen years ago)
LOL @ garden gnome.
Pix, rrobyn!
― KitCat, Friday, 19 October 2007 13:36 (eighteen years ago)
Persuant to the idea that style is not only what you wear, but how you wear it -- I give you: 85 Ways to Tie a Necktie:
We introduce a mathematical model of tieknots to classify necktie knots with respect to size and shape. It turns out that tying a tie knots is equivalent to a so-called persistent random walks on a triangular lattice. Using this model, the number of all possible knots in each class (set by the number of total and centre moves respectively) is calculated. The optimal knot in each class is determined by the aesthetic conditions of symmetry and balance. Of the 85 tie knots found, our model duly predicts the four knots in widespread use and further introduces nine new aesthetic ones.
Here: http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~ym101/tie4/tie4.html
It's a bit dry, but I figured some other dudes reading this thread might appreciate it. (If we had a I Got Style board, this article would get its own thread.)
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 19 October 2007 13:50 (eighteen years ago)
i thought bestie's website was okay. the designs seemed either dull or predictable. i've seen black and grey striped jumpers before, which isn't to say you can't design another one but there didn't seem to be much "design" involved. also low slung tight grey jeans with bright coloured belts, yawn.
― jed_, Friday, 19 October 2007 14:17 (eighteen years ago)
I'm charmed by bestie's checked socks and winklepickers, but he does look like kind of a hipster pain in the neck, and his designs seem v conservative for what they are -- ie, altho I like them just fine, they're already on everyone below Houston.
― Laurel, Friday, 19 October 2007 14:23 (eighteen years ago)
i did like the cardigan with the double placket that buttoned to one side.
― jed_, Friday, 19 October 2007 14:28 (eighteen years ago)
Laurel OTM, some of the more compelling aspects of bestie's collection -- the military parade style fastening on some of the shirts, and the white oxford with the gingham gusset panel under the arm -- are completely diluted by the underwhelming, Gaultier-derived nautical striping and grey basics. Also, I have a feeling that those clothes would not look quite so good bodytypes other than 'beefcake.'
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 19 October 2007 14:41 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, I would actually like a women's cardigan like that, it's true, but even though I adore off-center fastenings, a good cardigan does not a collection make.
― Laurel, Friday, 19 October 2007 14:43 (eighteen years ago)
agree
― jed_, Friday, 19 October 2007 14:48 (eighteen years ago)
consensus achieved.
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 19 October 2007 14:49 (eighteen years ago)
Elmo also OTM about body types. Are we done here?
― Laurel, Friday, 19 October 2007 14:56 (eighteen years ago)
dig those yellow trousers and big smile. thumbs up!
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1318/1083138843_b2bb6d4570_o_d.jpg
― czn, Friday, 19 October 2007 15:15 (eighteen years ago)
dear dapper, scruffy icelandic youth:
http://bp2.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/Rxc5lcWAeAI/AAAAAAAAEMY/c2TvoW_Wz-s/s1600-h/R0111616.jpg
i srsly dig yr style.
sincerely, elmo
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 19 October 2007 15:26 (eighteen years ago)
Hahah okay, this person might be rly annoying in real life, but I love this photo:
http://bp1.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/Rw-iMMWAdFI/AAAAAAAAEFA/mzdwXU39PNY/s1600-h/R0099890.jpg
― Laurel, Friday, 19 October 2007 15:28 (eighteen years ago)
http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e66/LimitedLiabilityGirl/Umbrella.jpg
― Laurel, Friday, 19 October 2007 15:30 (eighteen years ago)
Wow, that is a beautiful photo.
I LOVE the gnome guy!
Guys, I totally saw the down's syndrome girl with the barette out last night. I swear!
― roxymuzak, Friday, 19 October 2007 16:12 (eighteen years ago)
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1034/764370712_82e11d7f36_o.jpg
― Heave Ho, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 17:26 (eighteen years ago)
i don't normally like slogan tees but that one is kinda clever
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 17:50 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp2.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/Rx4DTsWAfBI/AAAAAAAAEUg/OpLe0EmZUyU/s1600-h/IMG_0138.jpg
nice jacket
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 13:19 (eighteen years ago)
damnit
link here: http://bp2.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/Rx4DTsWAfBI/AAAAAAAAEUg/OpLe0EmZUyU/s1600-h/IMG_0138.jpg
umbrella lady is decked out in a complete H&M outfit, from the pleated coat to the shoes....yuck.
― Spinspin Sugah, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 18:21 (eighteen years ago)
The slogan is nice because most slogans on t-shirts that address the viewer are antagonistic by default.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 18:30 (eighteen years ago)
oh that is one awesome plaid jacket wow
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 18:32 (eighteen years ago)
That man looks like every single man in Boise! ('cept he is well-dressed.)
― Abbott, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 18:33 (eighteen years ago)
Oh that's unfortunate. I'm not up on my H&M offerings.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 18:36 (eighteen years ago)
oh wait i like umbrella lady's shoes. since when does h&m have shoes?
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 18:57 (eighteen years ago)
jaymc, that slogan *is* antagonistic -- the pink letters spell out "i'm lying"
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 19:04 (eighteen years ago)
I HATE bitchy tees that imply promiscuity, polyandry, or putting out.
― Abbott, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 19:13 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp1.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/Rx9QhMWAfKI/AAAAAAAAEWQ/qclLpQMhsfA/s1600-h/IMG_0340.jpg
^^^ this is just... horribly unfortunate. there's a fine line between foppishness and campy costuming, and he fell on the wrong side of it. i feel for him, poor guy.
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 19:29 (eighteen years ago)
I demand more scrappy dapper fashion on here!
― KitCat, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 20:56 (eighteen years ago)
Haha, I didn't even notice that.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 21:01 (eighteen years ago)
OK, I take back what I said, then. Fuck that slogan.
Yes, Elmo, and that line lies somewhere on the far side of old ladies' pillboxes with the veils removed but the paste brooches left on. Way, way on the other side.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 21:03 (eighteen years ago)
The guy would be doing much better if he'd just take off that horrid fur thing.
― roxymuzak, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 21:37 (eighteen years ago)
i think he looks awesome except for the button-down white oxford shirt, he needs some dolman sleeves up in that bitch
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 21:39 (eighteen years ago)
I'm sick of boys in eyeshadow.
― Andi Mags, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 22:17 (eighteen years ago)
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/4686/1648/400/Bikingandsmoking.jpg
― LaMonte, Thursday, 25 October 2007 01:22 (eighteen years ago)
In eyeliner, never!
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 25 October 2007 04:41 (eighteen years ago)
I think t-shirts should never have words on them.
― n/a, Thursday, 25 October 2007 15:04 (eighteen years ago)
(Possible exception for band t-shirts)
(Another possible exception:
http://www.achewood.com/shop/rsrc/img/appm_premt_sks.jpg )
― n/a, Thursday, 25 October 2007 15:08 (eighteen years ago)
depres- sion
― jed_, Thursday, 25 October 2007 15:10 (eighteen years ago)
har xpost har
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 25 October 2007 15:14 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp2.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/RzMhVOo9iJI/AAAAAAAACe4/-cBx6cMleQA/s400/TulSktw.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:23 (eighteen years ago)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2366/1877360904_54c81c9469_m.jpg
― Heave Ho, Thursday, 8 November 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)
that girl and her outfit = adorable!
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 8 November 2007 19:37 (eighteen years ago)
(ok it's how i've been dressing/attempting to dress all fall! when i'm not dressed like dirtbag student!)
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 8 November 2007 19:39 (eighteen years ago)
(except i have toques instead of snappy hat)
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 8 November 2007 19:40 (eighteen years ago)
She's got the colors working hardcore. I think this is the second time this fall I've been like "OMG why doesn't EVERYONE wear burgundy tights?" Also: hat.
Strangely enough, for a fashion photo, I think that outfit would look better if she were LESS of a beanpole!
― nabisco, Thursday, 8 November 2007 19:42 (eighteen years ago)
is that a shop?? she has no shadow
― sleep, Thursday, 8 November 2007 19:50 (eighteen years ago)
burgundy tights are the best. i love them with dark grey.
i got a hat a while back that's a lot like the one the girl is wearing, but in black wool. i've just started wearing it out and am feeling a bit self-conscious about it.
― lauren, Thursday, 8 November 2007 19:51 (eighteen years ago)
looks like it's overcast, so she wouldn't throw a shadow necessarily xpost
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 8 November 2007 19:52 (eighteen years ago)
Weirdly I feel like I'm seeing a LOT of women lately in a kind of 30s-countryside landed-gentry look like that woman's -- I think there's another upthread where I was joking about her bag being full of Waugh books, and then there are two women in my neighborhood who dress like this pretty often. Really not a bad style cue to be taking, especially in fall.
― nabisco, Thursday, 8 November 2007 19:54 (eighteen years ago)
xpost yr right i guess. she still kind of looks like she's floating. anyway it's a nice outfit
― sleep, Thursday, 8 November 2007 19:55 (eighteen years ago)
I am super into the tights and the shoe-matching and the red/yellow/blue, I just wish her sweater was...a better fit? A little less hang-y? Something.
― Laurel, Thursday, 8 November 2007 20:05 (eighteen years ago)
i am kind of super excited abt going mtl shopping with lauren this wkend totally buying more coloured tights ooh
xposts yeah it's a totally good look for fall. my only thing is that it can sometimes verge on too quaint, which i am not so into. i.e., needs sorta more noise.
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 8 November 2007 20:12 (eighteen years ago)
god, I need some new, good slacks. All my dress pants are from my fattay era and look awful on me now. I've been wearing the hell out of my dressy jeans but they are not always appropriate.
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 8 November 2007 20:27 (eighteen years ago)
yes, tights ahoy! i recently ruined a few of my best pairs (one turquoise, one indigo) and need replacements.
― lauren, Thursday, 8 November 2007 20:34 (eighteen years ago)
What is MTL shopping (and can I come)? I don't really need tights though--as my work is pretty casual and I have a strong suspicion I will not be putting on a skirt until the weather gets warmer.
― Virginia Plain, Friday, 9 November 2007 03:24 (eighteen years ago)
http://image.blingee.com/images14/content/output/2007/11/19/275962137_48e3c65e.gif
tribute
― roxymuzak, Monday, 19 November 2007 01:18 (eighteen years ago)
(it was meant to say "fuck the haters")
From The Chloe Runway
― carne asada, Wednesday, 5 December 2007 00:39 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp1.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R2lvaE2uGLI/AAAAAAAAFjE/3Y_tnTqGb_w/s1600-h/IMG_4854.jpg
lol britishers
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 20 December 2007 15:09 (eighteen years ago)
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 20 December 2007 15:10 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp2.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R2lvZU2uGJI/AAAAAAAAFi0/-65UvChsrd4/s1600-h/IMG_4803.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 20 December 2007 15:14 (eighteen years ago)
That last one is awesome! Even with the teeth!
― marianna lcl, Thursday, 20 December 2007 16:18 (eighteen years ago)
http://bp0.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/R4VqB6daHZI/AAAAAAAACxs/D4UPQJo_Klo/s1600-h/Garcon.jpg
― nabisco, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 21:49 (seventeen years ago)
Scandinavian blogs are currently full of girls in perfectly nice huge winter coats and scarves, who look great not because of any fashion-related thing any of us would benefit from looking at, but because "look, I'm a 19-year-old blonde Norwegian girl with a goofy smile, look how ROSY my cheeks get when it's cold out"
Want to see CLOTHES, people, not cute girls who look like drawings from learning-to-read primers
― nabisco, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:01 (seventeen years ago)
This girl looks like she'd be cool, though:
http://bp1.blogger.com/_amPDaHtEbeU/RxsYqCJIgDI/AAAAAAAAALk/ieIz1OFliPU/s1600-h/carina.jpg
Additional notes:
(a) avoid looking at the "US Colleges" fashion blog
(b) one of the San Francisco street fashion bloggers has an aesthetic going on that I guess would be appropriate to San Francisco, in certain ways, except that it keeps turning up, like, umm ...
http://bp2.blogger.com/_MSewfroy9F0/R5HBwy84XFI/AAAAAAAAAGc/GNOajDi5hMY/s1600-h/DSC_1034.jpg
― nabisco, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:06 (seventeen years ago)
As my friend Coco said the other day..."Do anyone even look in the mirror anymore?"
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:09 (seventeen years ago)
so many things in the SF one i don't know where to start...
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:09 (seventeen years ago)
Or rather, "Does" since despite being originally Australian she does, actually, speak English good.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:10 (seventeen years ago)
ok WTF the brown baggy shiny tights?! why why why why why
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:10 (seventeen years ago)
Forget it, bell, it's the Haight
― nabisco, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:11 (seventeen years ago)
P.S. the pants and shoes on that first revive picture = probably how I would dress all the time, if I were a woman (though probably because they're kinda men's pants/shoes, and I'm a man)
that doesn't make any sense, but she looks great and I am envious
― nabisco, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:13 (seventeen years ago)
also "this girl looks cool" is like some kind of weird test of the point of a clothes/style/fashion blog -- by reasonable standards she is dressed TERRIBLY and looks like she just ran out of the house while sick to pick up more cold medicine. but she looks like a cool and well-dressed girl who just ran out of the house etc.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:15 (seventeen years ago)
That one poor SF girl looks like she mugged Peter Pan.
― molly mummenschanz, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:16 (seventeen years ago)
Especially if you mean THIS Peter Pan:
http://www.pixyland.org/peterpan/Imagezz/pixyFriends/OutAndAbout/RebeccaAndChristine.jpg
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:18 (seventeen years ago)
I keep thinking that one girl's lip jewelry is a crumb on my monitor.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:19 (seventeen years ago)
i thought carina.jpg was laurel for a sec !
UH @ pair of girls
― sleep, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:22 (seventeen years ago)
Oh that's cute! Me minus thirty lbs, maybe. She does look like fun, though, doesn't she.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:23 (seventeen years ago)
Oh my Peter Pan img link broek -- anyway it's the pixy one with all the costumes. You know the meme.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:24 (seventeen years ago)
i would wear the goth girl outfit in public WAY before i would wear that peter pan shit
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:25 (seventeen years ago)
You might mention that to Ian...how do you feel about green bodypaint?
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:26 (seventeen years ago)
Well geez so would *I*, that's not saying a whole lot
The goth outfit was a bit dressy, though, for streetwear
― nabisco, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:27 (seventeen years ago)
The girl in brown, I kind of dig the outfit except it's a bit much.. I never know how people do the thrown-together thing when probably it'd take quite a lot of thought & effort to throw all that together, unless you have a very very well edited wardrobe where everything matches.
I haven't been checking fashion blogs as much as I used to though! but there is a great picture of Lou Doillon at Sartorialist today.. I also got the new paris vogue which is 100% completely all Charlotte Gainsbourg
― daria-g, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:32 (seventeen years ago)
Saw that photo, loved the suspenders.
Also, did you see the lolcats treatment of that French Vogue? Wait wait till I find it....
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:33 (seventeen years ago)
http://jezebel.com/341362/bon-joor-cest-paris-lolvogue-encore
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:34 (seventeen years ago)
! No. A lolcats version of the calendar that came with it would be.. something
thanks for the link. that was kind of silly because it's full of rodarte which.. I just don't get it, I have yet to see any rodarte I don't hate.
― daria-g, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:35 (seventeen years ago)
They lolcat lots of spreads, I think maybe the original was of a shoot of people jumping, months ago.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:36 (seventeen years ago)
see this one I like - http://jezebel.com/gossip/maghag/mon-dieu-cest-french-lolvogue-shoulders-champagne-and-cigarettes-303240.php
I got this daryl K 90's jacket at the goodwill with really sharp shoulders, haven't gotten around to wearing it yet & must do so before spring
― daria-g, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:37 (seventeen years ago)
I'm saving the "shampayne" one for use as wallpaper after I get tired of "crocodiles will stone cold eat a bitch."
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 22:43 (seventeen years ago)
i wonder if they have any hassidic woman style blogs, as that is probably closest to my personal style.
sensible shoes 4 lyfe
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:09 (seventeen years ago)
Mwahahahah come visit me. Srsly did you ever notice how many CL missed connex mention "HAWT FROM WOMAN AT LAUNDROMATE" like SERIOUSLY?? Oh yeah, take that pillbox hat off, booyah.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:14 (seventeen years ago)
this isn't a blog, but it sure is a doozy.
also, longest url ever:
http://www.modestapparelchristianclothinglydiaofpurpledressescustomsewing.com/
― molly mummenschanz, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:15 (seventeen years ago)
Oh god typoeeee, should read "HAWT FRUM WOMAN" obv.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:15 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pikepine/1800017251/
― nabisco, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:17 (seventeen years ago)
^^ that's from a Seattle blog, though the guy is at Powell's in Portland
I swear to god, Molly, my mother has some of those patterns...FROM 1986.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:17 (seventeen years ago)
P.S. I think those people's mission is seriously compromised by the harlotry of CAP SLEEVES
― nabisco, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:18 (seventeen years ago)
laurel, plz tell me it's not this one:
http://www.modestapparelchristianclothinglydiaofpurpledressescustomsewing.com/modest_christian_cape_dresses_yochanan.jpg
/end sensible clothing imgs
― molly mummenschanz, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:20 (seventeen years ago)
Want to see CLOTHES, people, not cute girls
rong
― jergïns, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:21 (seventeen years ago)
(though i do want to see the clothes)
I dunno, Nabisco, I went to Seattle. People were like "Heels waht? We have like another two miles to walk, you don't mind, do you?" and "Isn't that skirt awfully short?" Me? MY skirt?? NOW YOU LISTEN TO ME, I DON'T EVEN OWN LEGGINGS, YOU TASTELESS BITCHAZ.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:21 (seventeen years ago)
I MEAN, AT LEAST I DIDN'T FORGET TO WEAR PANTS.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:22 (seventeen years ago)
laurel otm
we don't have shit for fasion here, comparatively
― jergïns, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:26 (seventeen years ago)
i recently decided to dress better, though. so we're changing this one seattleite at a time.
― jergïns, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:27 (seventeen years ago)
honestly i love making fun of these people but i do dress like a hassid minus the wig a lot of the time.
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:28 (seventeen years ago)
Well, actually, now that I live in an unheated apartment and I have to get dressed in the cold every morning, I can sort of understand the impulse to wear jeans and workboots 8 months of the year in Stl. It was way less warm than NYC in August and the constant cold damp would SUCK.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:29 (seventeen years ago)
Ha, but much like Saudis, I'm sure Hasidic women have their own field of subtle detailing to separate elegant, expensive clothes from "tacky" cheap ones.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:31 (seventeen years ago)
Lins: orthomom.blogspot.com. Not strictly speaking a fashion thing, but intresting.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:31 (seventeen years ago)
I can sort of understand the impulse to wear jeans and workboots 8 months of the year in Stl.
That one woman in my office -- some of you have heard all about her, filled up and ready to burst with fake body parts, her skin that special shade of tanning bed brown -- does not change her wardrobe all year round. She shows up today in her usual skin-tight pants, skin-tight and recklessly low-cut top, toeless high heels, you know, THAT whole look. Thing is, the high today was TWELVE. It's like, it's one thing to look like a tacky hussy all summer, but in the winter it's just... bizarre.
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:45 (seventeen years ago)
I think I totally agree, but that is one of those posts where that activates the contrarian lobe of the brain and now I feel like this woman is AWESOME
― nabisco, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:49 (seventeen years ago)
She is beyond weather
― nabisco, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:50 (seventeen years ago)
terminator3.jpg
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 January 2008 23:50 (seventeen years ago)
OMG I just reviewed this thread and realized one of the people pictured (from Vogue, no less) has attended an ILX FAP
― nabisco, Thursday, 24 January 2008 02:36 (seventeen years ago)
Also I was wrong about scarf-looping and (despite still thinking I was right) feel bad about being stubborn and dicky about the twee-girl thing
― nabisco, Thursday, 24 January 2008 02:38 (seventeen years ago)
Grazie mille,Valentino!
http://runway.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/23/so-this-is-it-valentino/index.html?hp
― Mr. Goodman, Thursday, 24 January 2008 03:07 (seventeen years ago)
http://bp1.blogger.com/_-5KczZv2nz4/R4ilOv5N9ZI/AAAAAAAAC3w/LhFWN_AJ08A/s1600-h/IMG_9252.jpg
^^^ a-whaaaaaaghhh? totally insane but in a way that commands respect or maybe fear
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 24 January 2008 18:10 (seventeen years ago)
I would probably be on the same page, except for the open chest.
― nabisco, Thursday, 24 January 2008 18:26 (seventeen years ago)
Great hair / glasses / makeup work, tho
arms that skinny should not inspire fear in anyone
― Oilyrags, Thursday, 24 January 2008 19:24 (seventeen years ago)
Okay: I kinda like how the girl on the right can wear a giant overall dress and not look sloppy or ragamuffiny about it!
― nabisco, Thursday, 24 January 2008 19:37 (seventeen years ago)
http://bp3.blogger.com/_uQLP9tzkrXg/Rz29njKS4bI/AAAAAAAAAQw/Qy_xFGL4Fds/s1600-h/161107_1.jpg
it might have been better if the denim was a darker wash but that looks like total country-mom couture to me. also, that dress has a fly! grossburger
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 24 January 2008 19:41 (seventeen years ago)
Wait, sorry, about the overalls one: she's wearing 7 different items plus a winter coat and hippie slouch bag NONE OF WHICH match or even complement each other, and that is NON-"ragamuffiny"?
― Laurel, Thursday, 24 January 2008 19:43 (seventeen years ago)
She's like one brush of coal dust away from being a street urchin.
― Laurel, Thursday, 24 January 2008 19:44 (seventeen years ago)
i mean, i don't mind the concept of an overall dress, it's got the casual vibe and is a bit tomboyish, yes, but i think it would need to be slimmer and maybe cut a little higher, or darker, or some other fabric because that dress make her look like like she doesn't give a shit and/or hates her body.
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 24 January 2008 19:49 (seventeen years ago)
Maybe my standards of non-ragamuffin have just been altered by the Extreme Ragamuffin look of a lot of these street-style blogs
I think I am also swayed by the fact that everything looks clean, pressed, newish, and worn in a properly fitted fashion (generally)
― nabisco, Thursday, 24 January 2008 19:49 (seventeen years ago)
her friend is much more put together but i don't get what's going on in the belt area
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 24 January 2008 19:50 (seventeen years ago)
Well clearly her friend is winning.
I'll still rep for her, though -- she strikes me as notably not-too-sloppy, for someone who is wearing an overalls dress
― nabisco, Thursday, 24 January 2008 19:52 (seventeen years ago)
Elmo, I think it's a striped sash twisted, or a stripey shirt showing or something.
xp The black plague strikes me as not too virulent, for someone who could have contracted ebola.
― Laurel, Thursday, 24 January 2008 19:53 (seventeen years ago)
re: zip - she may have made the skirt herself out of the overall pant legs.
― molly mummenschanz, Thursday, 24 January 2008 19:55 (seventeen years ago)
Sorry, N -- the problem with fashun blawgs is that I can hardly hardly ever find anything I do like, because you're right, the ragamuffin and falling-apart look is EVERYWHERE and the 24 yr olds who have time for fashun blogs tend to cannonize it. I wish I could find wimmin's fashun for put-together peoples.
― Laurel, Thursday, 24 January 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)
:(
― nabisco, Thursday, 24 January 2008 19:58 (seventeen years ago)
There is also still this sense that anything anyone posts to this thread is somehow some kind of commendation, as opposed to "huh, here is something I have a comment on"
i can't really handle the overalls - should they not just be left in the 90s where they belong last time i wore overalls was when i was like 13 and i mean eegh and the next time i wear overalls will be either if i am farming or a bricklayer or fishing or yeah
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:00 (seventeen years ago)
but that is me - maybe this girl feels awesome in the overalls and that makes all the difference
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:01 (seventeen years ago)
^diplomatic lie
I sometimes wish I were tall enough to wear overalls, but that is a remnant of watching too much Cosby Show and Yo! MTV Raps around like 88-91.
― nabisco, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:01 (seventeen years ago)
some of my best friends wear overalls?
xpost LOL
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:02 (seventeen years ago)
but in fact one of my best friends did wear the same overalls for like almost every day '93-'95
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:03 (seventeen years ago)
I actually have a pair of overalls but I am not allowed to wear them, even on laundry days.
― Laurel, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:03 (seventeen years ago)
i'm v. sick at the moment and just managed the strength to log on. in my weakened state, overall girl's outfit nearly killed me. the horror, the horror.
― lauren, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:03 (seventeen years ago)
ps - happy birthday, rrrobyn! i'm too feverish to click on yr bday thread.
― lauren, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:05 (seventeen years ago)
thanks :D
skinny jeans overalls?? http://bp0.blogger.com/_eLkHhhY7c24/RbjqwG2O2II/AAAAAAAAAGA/cvR8VM9nX9Y/s1600-h/skinnyoveralls.jpg
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:07 (seventeen years ago)
http://bp0.blogger.com/_eLkHhhY7c24/RbjqwG2O2II/AAAAAAAAAGA/cvR8VM9nX9Y/s1600-h/skinnyoveralls.jpg
if i were a bricklayer i wld prob wear a more sturdy/protected version of those though
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:09 (seventeen years ago)
and giant boots! it is a look!
i kind of want to wear overalls. but, i also want to own sheep and make cheese. so, there's no hope for me, i guess.
― molly mummenschanz, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:09 (seventeen years ago)
if you must wear overalls pls do not wear them with, like, 9 other items in clashing colors and patterns (a la missy upthread). that's the major problem here.
― lauren, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:11 (seventeen years ago)
i wld wear skinny jean coveralls oh believe it
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:13 (seventeen years ago)
in my imagination, a knee-length, empire-waist red corduroy overall dress could be A+ cute in an osh-koshy sorta way.
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:14 (seventeen years ago)
i really want some cute jumper-y dresses and see everyone wearing them but can't find ones that don't look like maternity wear.
― bell_labs, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:15 (seventeen years ago)
I'm mostly not real big on the jumper thing but sure wish I'd kept this light brown wool button up jumper I got from j crew in the early 90's, it was stylin, or would be right now.
― daria-g, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:22 (seventeen years ago)
i've also JUST started doing the boots over jeans thing. i've been so staunchly against it for years as a dumb hipster look, but now that it's become so mainstream my co-workers do it, i feel that it is ok.
― bell_labs, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:28 (seventeen years ago)
though i can't find any regular pants that are skinny enough to to this with, only jeans. where do i find skinny normal pants?
― bell_labs, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:31 (seventeen years ago)
2010 will be the year i accept footless leggings
― bell_labs, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:32 (seventeen years ago)
montreal is the mecca alpha and omega of boots over skinny jeans - it's like everyone (female) doesn't quite know what to do with themselves now that it's become a trend so they've all bought like 5 news pairs of boots each and 20 pairs of new skinny pants/jeans as some kind of proof of origin , i don't know
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:39 (seventeen years ago)
i have this pair of black skinny pants that are zara but i got them 2nd hand and can't really deal with zara as a store :/
hmm...zara. i have never been in that store and imagine all of the fabric being scratchy or too shiny.
― bell_labs, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:42 (seventeen years ago)
I bought skinny jeans but am stubbornly pushing them along the outsides of my harness boots, just to be contrary. :)
I think Zara is okay actually -- their cuts are way way too narrow for me but maybe better for you, lins...?!
― Laurel, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:43 (seventeen years ago)
I like Zara's silk/rayon tops sometimes, I found a great 40's style one in black last fall.. but their skirts never fit me.. trouser sizes bother me b/c I can't fit into a 6 like other stores.
― daria-g, Thursday, 24 January 2008 20:53 (seventeen years ago)
this decade's hipster style is now the mainstream style... I see those super skinny jeans on dudes even in my podunk hometown. I think I'm going to start dressing like an extra from Slacker now
― burt_stanton, Thursday, 24 January 2008 23:19 (seventeen years ago)
Zara have nice shirts for men
― I know, right?, Thursday, 24 January 2008 23:47 (seventeen years ago)
bizarro candystripe oxford with comically oversized contrast collar? okay
http://bp0.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R5nSnR0oDUI/AAAAAAAAGA4/QPGDlOIH0Co/s1600-h/IMG_2416.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 25 January 2008 15:52 (seventeen years ago)
it turns out that my mom has gone overall-crazy! somehow she found some dude in like, vermont -- i can't remember exactly where but vermont seems like the right kind of place -- who makes overalls by hand, allowing his "clients" to choose whatever fabric they want. she's taking to wearing overalls made out of EXTREMELY thick FELT stuff... she ordered like six pairs. she wears them like every day. parents today, huh? who can understand them.
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 25 January 2008 16:13 (seventeen years ago)
I've been thinking about getting some monkey boots. My Dad bought a pair about 15 years ago, and told me I'd end up wanting a pair. I always denied it, and I tried to fight it, but now I see he was right...
― gnarly sceptre, Friday, 25 January 2008 19:06 (seventeen years ago)
What style do you associate these with? Are they kinda mod/punk?? I don't wanna look like a throw-back, but I've been wanting some nice compact boots, and they sorta fit the bill...
http://www.surplusandoutdoors.com/ishop/images/877/BOOT-MONKEY.jpg
― gnarly sceptre, Friday, 25 January 2008 19:08 (seventeen years ago)
those look pretty nice and pretty versatile, i wouldn't worry about them carrying too much subcultural signification -- you could dress them a number of ways. plus, i love men's short boots.
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 25 January 2008 19:11 (seventeen years ago)
i like this girl. and her inspirations are amusings.
http://www.hel-looks.com/?p=image/archives/4/20071124_03/
― molly mummenschanz, Friday, 1 February 2008 04:43 (seventeen years ago)
one of the things that makes it great
― gabbneb, Friday, 1 February 2008 04:52 (seventeen years ago)
that girl is supercute!
― lauren, Friday, 1 February 2008 14:54 (seventeen years ago)
I approve!
― Laurel, Friday, 1 February 2008 14:59 (seventeen years ago)
I often forget about hel looks and then this thread will remind me to check it out and I will find something like this woman: http://www.hel-looks.com/?p=image/archives/5/20071123_02/ and she'll make my day.
― ENBB, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:00 (seventeen years ago)
oops - wrong link but those guys made me laugh. Here's the lady: http://www.hel-looks.com/?p=image/archives/8/20070919_01/.
"our favourite magazine is Men's Egg"
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:01 (seventeen years ago)
I like the one just before Mo-Dettes girl, too, in the blue and blue. Her sort of autumnal-colored '70s thing isn't my style but she looks great and like she knows what she's doing. Plus she has the face of a wood elf.
xp okay, that is not the blue-and-blue I was talking about! Haha.
― Laurel, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:02 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.hel-looks.com/?p=image/archives/5/20071115_01/
so neat and pulled-together, but the jacket keeps things from being boring. good work.
― lauren, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:14 (seventeen years ago)
laurel, exactly. i approve of her use of the knit vests. and yes. totally. it looks like she has pointy ears poking through her hair.
― molly mummenschanz, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:17 (seventeen years ago)
http://bp0.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R6Mkrx0oEqI/AAAAAAAAGMM/fvfB9rN8vv0/s1600-h/IMG_5259_2.jpg
hey, look! it's batgirl! i don't know why this silhouette has become so popular in high-fashion, it's so hideous
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:23 (seventeen years ago)
It's like wearing your jersey sheets everywhere you go! I secretly find that prospect very enticing. Plus if you got lost in the wilderness you could climb a tall tree to get yr bearings and then jump off and glide all the way back down.
You'd think she could have at least polished her boots, though.
― Laurel, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:26 (seventeen years ago)
i think she found that at a wardrobe dept. sale after they cancelled the golden girls
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:27 (seventeen years ago)
these hel looks chickses are making me feel so frumpy today. sigh @ having to leave the house at 7:45, never shopping and progressively getting too fat for my entire wardrobe over the course of the last 6 months
― bell_labs, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:34 (seventeen years ago)
Don't worry, bell, I didn't wash my face after getting back from the bar last night, and I didn't wash it this morning, either. I am still wearing Sockstar eye liner and waiting until it's 5pm and I can have my life back.
― Laurel, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:38 (seventeen years ago)
laurel!
― lauren, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:43 (seventeen years ago)
I know, it's terrible. Somehow between the 4 hrs' sleep and the consuming hunger and the mild hangover, I didn't give enough of a shit to do my make-up all over again this morning. So I left it.
― Laurel, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:49 (seventeen years ago)
http://i27.tinypic.com/34zkttt.jpg
― jhøshea, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:51 (seventeen years ago)
i see no 'trends' here
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 1 February 2008 15:52 (seventeen years ago)
yeah srsly!
also lolaurel
― rrrobyn, Friday, 1 February 2008 16:32 (seventeen years ago)
jeans and a black jacket that fits okay isn't a surprise as 'trend' in halifax tho - high fashion
― rrrobyn, Friday, 1 February 2008 16:45 (seventeen years ago)
sweatpants + uggs + hoodie == ooh la la, so trendy, so chic, so WTF go back to your dorm and get dressed, freshman
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 1 February 2008 16:49 (seventeen years ago)
i really like how proud of herself top right girl looks
btw in halifax i def saw much better dressed people than these
― jhøshea, Friday, 1 February 2008 16:50 (seventeen years ago)
Why are they all fucking smiling? Maybe the trend being spotlighted here is tooth whitening.
― Laurel, Friday, 1 February 2008 16:52 (seventeen years ago)
omg and her name is maddison proudfoot lolololololol
― jhøshea, Friday, 1 February 2008 16:52 (seventeen years ago)
i know this is more "fashion week" than "street fashion" but:
http://men.style.com/slideshows/mens/fashionshows/F2008MEN/TBMEN/RUNWAY/00250m.jpg http://men.style.com/slideshows/mens/fashionshows/F2008MEN/TBMEN/RUNWAY/00270m.jpg http://men.style.com/slideshows/mens/fashionshows/F2008MEN/TBMEN/RUNWAY/00430m.jpg
tom ford, u mad.
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 19:14 (seventeen years ago)
the owl coat is aaawesome
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 20:47 (seventeen years ago)
wait it is an owl suit! pants & jacket! !!!
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 20:48 (seventeen years ago)
O RLY?
http://men.style.com/slideshows/mens/fashionshows/F2008MEN/TBMEN/RUNWAY/00270m.jpg
― sanskrit, Tuesday, 12 February 2008 21:28 (seventeen years ago)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2117/2261750596_1961f5eaa5_b.jpg
*applause*
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 14:46 (seventeen years ago)
i really think dude should be wearing a shirt, but otherwise A+
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 14:47 (seventeen years ago)
i LOVE the dress.
― lauren, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 14:59 (seventeen years ago)
Agreed re shirt, and agreed re they are awfully cute!! I think homegirl could lose the white head-pouf but what do I know, maybe it was the bow on her Valentine's Day present and has sentimental value.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:08 (seventeen years ago)
what city is that from? looks soooo familiar...
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:09 (seventeen years ago)
I like the one guy in the left background loling at owl dude.
― roxymuzak, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:13 (seventeen years ago)
I think it's Bryant Park, bell labs. That guy's shoes are killing me they're so great.
― Lamp, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:37 (seventeen years ago)
Bryant Park = Fashun Week
― Laurel, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:40 (seventeen years ago)
ah ok. i didn't recognize the street lamps...
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:48 (seventeen years ago)
What is the best website for fashion news? I hate style.com.
― roxymuzak, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 15:50 (seventeen years ago)
thefashionspot.com/forums
― daria-g, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:03 (seventeen years ago)
christopher kane pix in the 'designers' forum right now!
― daria-g, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:06 (seventeen years ago)
http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/4043/021220081109426231zb1.jpg
― daria-g, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:11 (seventeen years ago)
thanks for the link, daria!
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:30 (seventeen years ago)
sure no prob! Its a very handy site.. a bit overwhelming but i usually check the trends section, any thread on carine roitfeld, they have the pix from fashion weeks shows up before anybody else, there are some very stylish people on the "what are you wearing today" thread particularly two people who post every day who are denim geeks somewhat and a stylist in singapore who loves rag & bone. if you go back a few days' of posts you'll be able to tell who they are
― daria-g, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:35 (seventeen years ago)
vest no shirt neck bandanna cloying little hat and period piece girlfriend oh great u guys - they look like some grotesque island offspring of the 90s swing dancing craze
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:41 (seventeen years ago)
Maybe could send him a corny indie fuxor Brooklyn-style Tshirt for his next photo session.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:42 (seventeen years ago)
maybe u could go omg i <3 vintage shopping w/them huh
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:44 (seventeen years ago)
yeah sorry i cant even look at that couple until the guy puts on a shirt
― max, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:45 (seventeen years ago)
Arm tattoos are the new t-shirt. We're living in a post-t-shirt world.
― Lamp, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:46 (seventeen years ago)
I love vintage but not looking totally retro :(
― daria-g, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:47 (seventeen years ago)
im trying to figure out where they could be from
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:48 (seventeen years ago)
Yes, heaven forbid we reference any past eras in our fashion choices. From now on, everyone dresses totally future-style! Bring on the silver bubble helmets!
Er, hold on a second....
― Laurel, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:49 (seventeen years ago)
yah u know owlman totally pwns them 1m%
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:49 (seventeen years ago)
i think the girl's outfit would be cute if she wasn't wearing that wtf doily on her head
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:49 (seventeen years ago)
come on dont u want to say something abt her makeup too
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:51 (seventeen years ago)
uh...she may have gone a lil overboard on the blush?
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:53 (seventeen years ago)
The guy is way better turned out than the girl, the girl's dress is a cool find but not accessorized in any useful way, and her choice of lipstick color is v clashy with the orange. Thing on head really needs to go. She alone is not a win.
All that said, I like what they're TRYING to do WAY more than I like '80s-influenced "wearing/falling out of everything at once" shapeless shit.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:54 (seventeen years ago)
i am just happy these days when girls remember to wear pants
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:55 (seventeen years ago)
they are TRYING WAY too hard
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:55 (seventeen years ago)
i don't like the dude at all. he seems like he'd reek of hair oil and BO. i just really like that dress. without the headpiece, it's a nice, clean look.
― lauren, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:56 (seventeen years ago)
Haha Lauren! Okay, maybe. Men wear the worst shit every single day in such huge numbers that I find it rly gratifying to see a good cut of trousers/attention paid to tailoring. I'm an easy sell like that.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:58 (seventeen years ago)
the both kind of look like they would be smelly. the girl looks like she would smell like musty wool.
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 16:59 (seventeen years ago)
its because theyre obv from a country where its ok to smell bad i just cant put my finger on which one
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:00 (seventeen years ago)
brooklyn?
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:01 (seventeen years ago)
lol i do believe those to be americans
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:02 (seventeen years ago)
i do not believe those to be americans
the guy has sort of a spanish gaze going
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:03 (seventeen years ago)
maybe they are from the basque countries
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:04 (seventeen years ago)
obviously there's a lot of details to pick at, but i really like that their outfits, separately or together, actually work as a distinguishable 'look' without looking too stuffy or serious. i don't have the body to pull off a high-waisted trouser / short waistcoat look like he does, but i can certainly appreciate the proportions and how the pieces work together.
still wish he had a shirt on, though, even just a band-collar.
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:06 (seventeen years ago)
actually maybe they are flemmish
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:06 (seventeen years ago)
elmo whered the pic come from - is there info on their nation of origin?
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:07 (seventeen years ago)
maybe they are kurdish or tibetan
the photo was taken during london fashion week, fwiw
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:08 (seventeen years ago)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2146/2260962937_23e2b67e1c_b.jpg
this girl really pulls the look off way better than pouf-head girl and how
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:10 (seventeen years ago)
there should be a ren-fair type thingy for people like this
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:12 (seventeen years ago)
they can drink highballs and ride around in blimps or whatever
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:13 (seventeen years ago)
hot! also i like those shoes, they look comfy, like they have a rubber clunky heel
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:13 (seventeen years ago)
Awwww! Yes, girl #2 looks WAY better. That is the idea.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:13 (seventeen years ago)
Actually except for the fact that I don't wear skirts that long, I basically have that outfit.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:15 (seventeen years ago)
you want to talk 'trying too hard' -- someone please tell ladies that gonzo neon prints are really only acceptable if you are under 27.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2304/2260310844_58c3695e0c_b.jpg
seriously, cut it out.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2092/2260312534_266cfede7c_b.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:16 (seventeen years ago)
w o w
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:16 (seventeen years ago)
That's what I was saying with the "wearing everything at once". No.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:17 (seventeen years ago)
its at least completely hilarious
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:17 (seventeen years ago)
oh man crazy old britisher ladies
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:18 (seventeen years ago)
i like how yr left wondering what other sort of crazy tron shit the 1st lady has going on under her poncho
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:20 (seventeen years ago)
I like what both girls are wearing. Makes sense that the couple are in London, there's a lot of that head-bow thing going on right now. I rather like it.
― Anna, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:22 (seventeen years ago)
I did not mean the crazy-coloured jacket lady though - too much there.
Y'know, I frequently get the impression that few British women understand what's actually flattering to them. Is that just a cultural blindness b/c I are USian? xp to Anna and in ref to the pattern-craziness!
― Laurel, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:23 (seventeen years ago)
I haf never lived there so I defer to Laren, Anna, et al.
http://bp3.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R7CORHtxSZI/AAAAAAAAGZU/v0IAHZIybFI/s1600-h/IMG_8773.jpg
^^ same girl, same jacket, a less successful combo imho
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:28 (seventeen years ago)
I lover her so much for wearing red, white, and blue. So so much. Love. Yr right, the grey isn't really accenting anything. But some days you just need that certain layer....
― Laurel, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:29 (seventeen years ago)
http://bp2.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R7IA9XtxSwI/AAAAAAAAGcM/3E8B2ZopjmU/s1600-h/IMG_9151.jpg
^^^ and this is just indefensible vampire bullshit
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:30 (seventeen years ago)
hipsters be dressing like my bizarre spinster aunt now?
― DG, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 17:30 (seventeen years ago)
i like the belt over the jacket thing
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:40 (seventeen years ago)
http://bp3.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/R7L9JlmJ0rI/AAAAAAAAC94/ssKj6I7enJY/s1600-h/Wsuitedweb.jpg
^^^ crossdress for success. the shirt is the only thing i'd definitely change -- button down collar which kinda goes against the dressy look. that and a longer jacket might look better? pretty good, tho.
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:45 (seventeen years ago)
yah totes sexy - agreed on the shirt
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 18:55 (seventeen years ago)
- the rivers run red with blood - anarchy is unleashed upon the land - praise is offered to a man wearing spectator shoes and a vest without a shirt
― nabisco, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 19:07 (seventeen years ago)
srsly i'm generally unsettled by high-level in-period dressing + makeup anyway tho
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 20:07 (seventeen years ago)
red tights a+
― jergïns, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 20:15 (seventeen years ago)
This is one of those things where I like a woman's clothes because they're basically men's clothes and I want them for myself, but ... apart from the gross bag, this is a woman who Owns Cool Things:
http://bp1.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/R7BWNlmJ0fI/AAAAAAAAC8Y/UMmSdIxpGh4/s1600/GreyScardRLweb.jpg
― nabisco, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 21:43 (seventeen years ago)
I don't quite follow what's going on at the bottom of her shirt, though
looks like an oversized men's shirt ballooning out a little between the vest & pants?
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:09 (seventeen years ago)
I don't have permission to see it, apparently?
― Laurel, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:10 (seventeen years ago)
From Satorialist, just control + F "individualist" on the front page.
You will probably not like it, though; it is casual / ragtag stuff. Except with a dramatic, elegant scarf that is the complete opposite.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:15 (seventeen years ago)
WAIT NO those pants look pleathery, I take it all back eww
she does look neat and it seems to suit her i do not know abt her pants though and yeah bag is whoa i like her scarf (i wld look super dyke in this :/ )
xpost lol
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:27 (seventeen years ago)
that chick in the suit is a+++++++++++++ would like her to be my boss IF U KNOW WHAT I MEAN
― max, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:28 (seventeen years ago)
i dont love the button down collar but i think the short jacket is great on her
― max, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:29 (seventeen years ago)
yeah i totally dig the grey suit also she is v hot with the hair and glasses n all - i'm not sure she's real
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:31 (seventeen years ago)
my new fashion goal is to be a reality confusion zone
yeah that's gotta be a modeling shot/not traditional "street photography" but still, hot. of course.
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:32 (seventeen years ago)
yeah shes also standing in the middle of traffic and not getting hit?
― max, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:32 (seventeen years ago)
my money is on her being an angel
I wd say "And she has 4 foot-long legs" but that's not that unusual in NYC. Looks great. Rock on.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:34 (seventeen years ago)
i would kill for a really well-made suit that actually fits and looks hot. they are always too boxy for me, at least the ones i can afford.
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:34 (seventeen years ago)
ha: ditto, but in the men's fitting room instead
― nabisco, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:37 (seventeen years ago)
when i am rich i will give you all 2000 to go to london and get a bespoke suit at savile row
― max, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:37 (seventeen years ago)
also would kill for: the high-waisted riding-type pants my coworker wears tucked into boots. i want some pants like this sooo badly but i'm afraid to ask her wear she got them cos i know she drops bank on clothes.
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:38 (seventeen years ago)
angel-in-traffic woman makes me want to dress better and also wear ties so i can wear neat tie clips
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:39 (seventeen years ago)
My one great suit is an inherited bespoke, only bespoken by someone an inch or two shorter and beefier than me (i.e., my dad around age 40)
― nabisco, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:39 (seventeen years ago)
xpost - Tie clips are really hard to come across these days, though!
― nabisco, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:40 (seventeen years ago)
height is mind over matter, nabs
― max, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:40 (seventeen years ago)
just slouch.
i bought a suit from j.crew years ago when i was interviewing for my current job, but somehow the legs are now to short for me by like a couple of inches. did my legs get longer? they couldn't have! dry cleaners don't shrink things, do they?
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:42 (seventeen years ago)
Oh and Bell, there is a whole fancy-looking thing that appears to be a ... riding-clothes store (?) around the corner from my office, on the east side -- I still can't tell from the window whether it's for actual riders or just riding-style / country-gentleman fashion and home decor
I will go inside during lunch sometime and see how many thousands of dollars things cost.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:43 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah bell but look at Traffic Angel, her pants are too short, too! She has so much leg she can afford to waste about 5-6 inches of it with cuffs and sticky-outy ankles. I'm in awe.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:44 (seventeen years ago)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2347/2262169470_3cdd16bc0b.jpg
― binge, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:47 (seventeen years ago)
yeah but her pants look like they are SUPPOSED to be short, not just poorly tailored.
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:48 (seventeen years ago)
If you had yours shortened a little more emphatically (and maybe had the legs tapered more? I dunno, haven't seen 'em) it could work for you, too?
― Laurel, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:49 (seventeen years ago)
mayyyybe but i think it would work a little better if i were as hot as that woman.
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:50 (seventeen years ago)
shes pretty but not the prettiest, the look really makes her!
― max, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:51 (seventeen years ago)
and her hair
Yes, darling, I know. xp to labs
― Laurel, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:52 (seventeen years ago)
Hey guys we're all totally hot on this thread.
This is ILX's hottest thread, us, right now.
Never forget.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:54 (seventeen years ago)
</tyra>
fiercest thread ever
― max, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:55 (seventeen years ago)
Seriously, I have seen us all and we are all beautiful.
Stay tuned to find out John McCain's favorite candy
― nabisco, Wednesday, 13 February 2008 22:58 (seventeen years ago)
I'm going to be vain and show off the jacket I got for $40 http://www.flickr.com/photos/73274386@N00/2276660662/
― Hurting 2, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 05:28 (seventeen years ago)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2250/2276660662_7d6ee9c123.jpg?v=0
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2093/2276656956_b401eafbc3.jpg?v=0
that is all
― Hurting 2, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 05:29 (seventeen years ago)
Are there any rules for the long top/smock thing + leggings? I thought if it was short enough to definitely NOT be a dress then you should wear bottoms of at least leggings-thickness. But I have seen yesterday a girl wearing this satiny long top with NORMAL black tights that have that more transparent bit at the top and you could see her knickers and everything. And no one acted like this was odd! Am I really old?
― Not the real Village People, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 18:32 (seventeen years ago)
yes i've seen this a lot and it is very alarming.
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 18:52 (seventeen years ago)
but i guess it just dates me as being from the generation that didn't forget to wear pants
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 18:53 (seventeen years ago)
Haha welcome to our thread.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 18:54 (seventeen years ago)
From Sartorialist today: I thought felicity moved to LA!!
http://bp0.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/R7WgaFmJ0xI/AAAAAAAAC-o/wJm1S3Q63pU/s1600-h/WTpldpntweb.jpg
― Laurel, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:24 (seventeen years ago)
Okay, let's try again: I thought felicity moved to LA!!
― Laurel, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:25 (seventeen years ago)
Unfortunately the larger version doesn't look as much like her as it did on the front page.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:26 (seventeen years ago)
Reading this thread always makes me feel like I should stop drinking so much so I can buy nicer clothing.
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:27 (seventeen years ago)
those culotte/pant things are horrifying.
― lauren, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:29 (seventeen years ago)
mainly due to what appears to be a huge sash/auxiliary layer around the waist... ?
― lauren, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:30 (seventeen years ago)
Wait. Jon, did you just post that same message on another thread?
xpost, are they even pants? They are hideous, especially around the waist area.
― roxymuzak, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 19:32 (seventeen years ago)
the only way i find the tights and short tunic/smock/dress over it acceptable is if it is the summer and everyone looks crazy anyway because of the heat. seeing that sheerer part of the tights peeking out drives me nuts.
― Yerac, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:07 (seventeen years ago)
guys where can i buy bowties on the cheap?
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:12 (seventeen years ago)
that's right i said bowties, motherfuckers, what u gonna do about it
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:28 (seventeen years ago)
vintage stores?
― lauren, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:29 (seventeen years ago)
and i'm loath to put a price tag on my own ill-advised experiments in style but $50 seems really way too much for a knot of fabric
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:30 (seventeen years ago)
why because this dude look intersting
http://www.mensflair.com/ns/media/bowtie-abrooks.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 20:59 (seventeen years ago)
i think you could totally do the bow-tie in high fashion style
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:10 (seventeen years ago)
haha fake felicity is rocking the flannel-around-the-waist
― max, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:11 (seventeen years ago)
she needs some doc martens and a homemade mudhoney t-shirt
it is the summer and everyone looks crazy anyway because of the heat
i love this about high summer - same goes for deep winter crazy/who-cares fashion - it is great
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 19 February 2008 21:13 (seventeen years ago)
Thanks, Intimidator. I do like fake me's tartan (Campbell variant?) and biker jacket silhouette, although tan washes the real me out terribly.
I don't mind fake me's flannel-around-the waist/culottes. Bring back dirt bag couture.
http://www.coloribus.com/files/paedia/print/part_2/23639/preview_320_260.jpg
― felicity, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 00:41 (seventeen years ago)
I guess that early 90's grunge IS back.. I got some vintage plaid shirts (wool, not flannel though) and a pair of sort of clunky vintage black oxford shoes (90's J Crew). Might ask my mother to send me a couple of those long flowered dresses I used to wear then when forced to dress up. I really wish I hadn't given away my favorite black watch plaid flannel shirt and chuck taylor style shoes with band names written all over them :)
― daria-g, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:30 (seventeen years ago)
Black Watch and Lindsey are my favorite tartans.
(nabisco, sorry for co-opting your thread in the name of plaid.)
― felicity, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:36 (seventeen years ago)
aw man now i really miss my plaid flannel shirts of yore
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:40 (seventeen years ago)
in the early 90s i remember people talkin about how flannel shirts were now cool and i was like "they've always been cool!!!"
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:42 (seventeen years ago)
I used to love Black Watch but it went NUTS in the...early 90s?? I think b/c the colors were "subdued" jewel tones it was considered more elegant or classier than the flashier tartans...I know Laura Ashley made a shitload of prints in evergreen and blue in that same period. Cannot abide it now but that's not the poor tartan's fault.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:42 (seventeen years ago)
Haha and I have sort of researched this b/c I want to have a dancing kilt made and I've been combing through tartans online for like two years. Unfort the registered mills are SPENDY.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:44 (seventeen years ago)
and i was like "you mean the shirts we wear when we go camping and hiking? sweet" xpost
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:44 (seventeen years ago)
guys i still have tons of flannels they have never not looked good
― max, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:45 (seventeen years ago)
guys i'm sorry, plaids are cool and everything but don't kid yourself about the flannel unless you think looking like eddie bauer's dad is a good look
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:47 (seventeen years ago)
;_;
― max, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:48 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, sorry, cannot get on board. Flannel reminds me of pick up-driving, prejudice-having, Midwestern slobs with beards and I am for none of those things. But that's just my upbringing.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:51 (seventeen years ago)
:'(
― felicity, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:55 (seventeen years ago)
Laurel have you tried New England thrift stores if you are ever there? I always found a TON of tartan plaid kilts. I have a tartan skirt myself but it's really short.. and a longer one that's pendleton and kind of china blue, good quality but I never wear it..
― daria-g, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:57 (seventeen years ago)
the only plaid i have now is 1 camping shirt for only camping/hiking purposes + 1 cowboy-styles shirt that is fitted, 1 bright plaid shirt that is girly and fitted so i think that's okay and not eddie bauer's dad unless eddie bauer's dad is a total queen
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:57 (seventeen years ago)
oh i have a couple of plaid/tartan skirts but never wear them tho they are cute it is all about the cut with these kinds of things, i think
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:59 (seventeen years ago)
Daria, that would be a great idea but a highland dance kilt is very very particularly designed. Not the same as women's dress skirts, sadly, because that would make it a whole bunch cheaper.
Also I grew up in calf-length knife-pleated Pendleton and similar plaid skirts with linen camp blouses and ribboned flats, and I'm just not sure I ever need to look 17 again. :)
― Laurel, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 17:59 (seventeen years ago)
Aw, why must you hate the dirt bag fashion I love? Next thing you're going to tell me is that cutoff denim skirts with motorcycle boots and mirrored C*H*I*Ps shades and Ed Hardy trucker hats are hoochie mama?
― felicity, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:01 (seventeen years ago)
Kekekeke I wore a cutoff denim Diesel skirt and my harness boots several times last week. TOGETHER. I still love you, felicity.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:02 (seventeen years ago)
daria, you'll be sad to know that there will soon be NO MORE VINTAGE CLOTHING STORES in providence :( :( :(
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:04 (seventeen years ago)
if you want used duds in RI you will basically have to go to the sally or to savers
I love you, too, Intimidator. Have you ever been to the annual Tartan Week Scottish Exposition in Grand Central Station?
― felicity, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:06 (seventeen years ago)
I've never gone to the Scottish Village in GCT b/c self-important reverence for manufactured traditions irritates me, and so do crowds. I've marched/danced in the parade a couple of times, though, and we usu do a gig on Ellis Island that week.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:08 (seventeen years ago)
the teamsters union is set to endorse obama, perhaps the biggest union endorsement so far -- it'll probably help in ohio
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:13 (seventeen years ago)
oh shit wrong thread :(
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:14 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah keep that out of the fashion thread!! I gave up on the politics thread because I'm just too bummed about where things are going frankly.
Laurel is the dancing kilt the one where it's more of a wrap style with two buckled straps to close + a kilt pin? I used to find those at Savers too.. bought one but never wore, gave it back eventually
― daria-g, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:21 (seventeen years ago)
I got all my vintage from Savers elmo.. At actual vintage stores, I never find anything I want, but Savers rules, I found all sorts of cool stuff, a great 40's dress, comme des garcons shirt, early 70's (I think) YSL dress I never wear, a couple of utterly fantastic wool coats, black 50's dress I still wear.. a ton of other stuff. I wish the hell I could easily get to RI from here just to go through all the Savers (East prov, Warwick, Fall River, New Bedford)..
― daria-g, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:26 (seventeen years ago)
laurel i was wearing flannel when i met you!!! and i had a beard!! dont judge me!!!!!!!!!
― max, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:30 (seventeen years ago)
D, women's dance kilts fasten on the right, have one or two buckles (often only one because it helps the "apron" -- the flat front part -- to hang more freely), and a VERY high waist so when you raise your arms, your blouse doesn't show. Also depending on the size of the sett of the tartan, you want as much pleating as possible for the best swing on turns and jumps, without making it unreasonably heavy. And when I say "unreasonably", these people are using a whole different scale. Those things weigh like WAU.
No kilt pin, btw -- it would take too much motion out of split leaps and high cuts and stuff. You just have to wear coordinating spanky pants and be resigned to showing your underwear.
I know, max, but I like you anyway. My prejudices are easily overcome on an individual basis.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:36 (seventeen years ago)
Ha, remember this dude, upthread?
― nabisco, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 18:59 (seventeen years ago)
this woman takes a look i normally have no patience for -- voluminous top above high-waisted short-shorts over dark tights -- and makes me love her for it. also, she is foxy. she wins.
http://bp3.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R7x097qioRI/AAAAAAAAGkc/zVy01GfUcqQ/s1600-h/IMG_1098.jpg
http://bp1.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R7x09bqioQI/AAAAAAAAGkU/YRQYLg8XoBs/s1600-h/IMG_1063.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:07 (seventeen years ago)
i still can't buy into the dark tights there
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:09 (seventeen years ago)
the seafoam / camel / aubergine / cordovan / scarlet color combo really makes is work for me, its great
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:13 (seventeen years ago)
she's really foxy, but the tights are too sheer.
― lauren, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:13 (seventeen years ago)
i wld say tights should be more brown, like the shoes yes she is foxy + foxy haircut that looks great on her
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:15 (seventeen years ago)
i would only get rid of the neckwear, the blouse makes it redundant and distracting. i don't mind the sheerness of the tights, i think they give her legs some dimension and shape.
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:16 (seventeen years ago)
she is foxy and i love the colors. but not those weird shorts or lego haircut.
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:17 (seventeen years ago)
Use of color is genius!! Hahah "lego" haircut. I think it's okay, it wouldn't suit everyone but it does her, so awesome! The high-waisted shorts and tights, though...clearly someone with her legs could wear anything, and this outfit is sooo artful...but I'm just not sure I can endorse. You know, for the ages.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:19 (seventeen years ago)
right now those seem like the sexiest shoes i have ever seen on a woman
― nabisco, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:20 (seventeen years ago)
i don't think the haircut suits her face AT all. it makes her look kind of severe.
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:21 (seventeen years ago)
i think she's going for severe!
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:22 (seventeen years ago)
except severe gets destroyed by bunching fabric of shorts :/
which is possibly what makes it fashion
i love severe haircuts, hee hee.
― lauren, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:25 (seventeen years ago)
i think she kinda looks like a delinquent flapper secretary on her way back to the office from the woolworths lunch counter
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:26 (seventeen years ago)
Suddenly I feel a need to note that I don't have a thing about women wearing men's clothing, or anything -- there just happen to be good ones on this thread, and, umm, stuff. Maybe that sort of thing just looks great right now, in contrast to young city girls in lots of stretchy, slouchy jersey things, who haven't worn anything with buttons in years. (It seems to work with guys, too, really, which is why I said the thing somewhere about dressing like Bertie Wooster.)
― nabisco, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:26 (seventeen years ago)
i think with all the advances in fabric technology that these shorts should exist as vintage in all their great buttons and high-waisted glory but with new-tech fabric that creases far less
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:33 (seventeen years ago)
I think I don't know how she can sit down when her waist is basically corseted by twill and many fastenings. Does she need a slanty chair?
― Laurel, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:34 (seventeen years ago)
there's no sitting in fashion
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:35 (seventeen years ago)
Oh right! Haha. My probl with the shorts is not that she looks rly fashunobble and clearly knows what she's doing (or whomever dressed her does), it's that rrrrobyn is right, the shorts are wrinkling and pulling and showing stress lines AND THEY'RE ON THE SKINNIEST HEALTHY PERSON ALIVE. If they bunch up on a model they is gonna look like shit on other peoples.
Which is maybe the point of wearing them?
― Laurel, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:36 (seventeen years ago)
yeah i think that's why i said it was fashion!
b/c shorts are for Active Wear and not just fashion leaning, lounging and stooping
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:38 (seventeen years ago)
Well the ones down from the pockets are cut into the garment, and any others are ... not particularly severe, I don't think!
― nabisco, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:39 (seventeen years ago)
re: lines and folds and whatnot, obviously
― nabisco, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:40 (seventeen years ago)
-- lauren, Wednesday, February 20, 2008 7:25 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
i love them on some people, on a rounder more angelic face they look great. i think it doesn't flatter her long, oval face so much. that's kind of how my face is, and i cringe at photos of myself from when i had a bob.
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:43 (seventeen years ago)
There are definitely pleats going down from the pocket fastenings, but the more diagonal shadows that point towards the button fly are stress wrinkles. Makes me almost wonder if they are re-purposed children's shorts? But I'm not up on my designer output.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:44 (seventeen years ago)
bell, your face is looking much less severe there days, I say again! You are lovelier than ever.
i've definitely got a huge, round head. not sure about angelic, though.
― lauren, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:46 (seventeen years ago)
it would be perfect with the right tights.
― Yerac, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:52 (seventeen years ago)
Lauren's head?
― nabisco, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:53 (seventeen years ago)
"masked ILXors rob dozens of Soho boutiques"
― nabisco, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:54 (seventeen years ago)
haha but probably! xpost
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:54 (seventeen years ago)
hosiery makes my giant head sweaty.
― lauren, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)
Lauren's head is for sale in Soho?? Wau I am REALLy not up on my designer output.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 19:58 (seventeen years ago)
my joke has gone wrong and I apologize
― nabisco, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:07 (seventeen years ago)
omg guys MINK BOW TIE on ebay
http://i15.ebayimg.com/06/i/000/da/03/e872_1.JPG
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:13 (seventeen years ago)
it would look like a giant caterpillar at your throat.
― lauren, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:16 (seventeen years ago)
i can't think of any reason i would want it other than to possess something as hilarious as a bow tie made of fur.
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:18 (seventeen years ago)
That is just a long-dead hamster someone is trying to monetize
― nabisco, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:19 (seventeen years ago)
it's very tempting in a surrealist sort of way
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:20 (seventeen years ago)
It is a giant prickly caterpillar! The kind with spines!! OMG Elmo, I am in awe. Probably should never ever be worn, tho, you are correct.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:21 (seventeen years ago)
lego haircut <--- haha
― jergïns, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:22 (seventeen years ago)
we used to call those comic book haircuts
― Yerac, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:28 (seventeen years ago)
totally! like mink underwear!
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:29 (seventeen years ago)
or lego hair!
i think if someone where wearing that, i would be weirdly tempted out of horror and curiosity to touch it. so i guess, only wear it if you like people touching your neck?
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:42 (seventeen years ago)
thus is the mink codpiece invented
― nabisco, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:47 (seventeen years ago)
fuck it, i'm gonna bid on it
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:50 (seventeen years ago)
Front row, fashion show, Berlin:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2115/2229575230_92d1f593f5.jpg
― nabisco, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:53 (seventeen years ago)
That's kind of...cute?
― Laurel, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 20:58 (seventeen years ago)
It's generally awesome!
― nabisco, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:01 (seventeen years ago)
The site of a cute fashiony + non-fashiony couple at a fashion event just generally makes me feel nice about the universe (and should remind us all that if we ever head to fashiony events, we should just wear t-shirts and ordinary sneakers, because we will stand out as oddly awesomer than everyone else)
― nabisco, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:12 (seventeen years ago)
("sight")
Oh, I think she's kind of fashiony, it's the guy who is like "LOL TRUCKDRIVER".
― Laurel, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:15 (seventeen years ago)
Sorry, I re-read and I get that now. Yes! Still so cute.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:16 (seventeen years ago)
that guy is probably a dj
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:17 (seventeen years ago)
i mean electronic artist
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 20 February 2008 21:18 (seventeen years ago)
i like that whole front row
The Norwegian BM dudes with long, flat hair look awesomely hot in flannel shirts.
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 21 February 2008 00:26 (seventeen years ago)
apparently someone wanted the fur bow tie more than i did! lol outbid
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 16:22 (seventeen years ago)
It was clearly this guy:
http://bp0.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R7X4pHtxTKI/AAAAAAAAGfc/JlWcltr8_K8/s400/IMG_9851.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:44 (seventeen years ago)
surely that sweater was not designed for a man
though i might appreciate the sweater it if dude wasn't staring at me like that
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:51 (seventeen years ago)
uhhh dude cut it out please
why is he staring like that
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:52 (seventeen years ago)
Haha, there is a cuteness to that look, I have to admit it. I would probably hate this guy if I met him in person, though.
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:53 (seventeen years ago)
Ha, whoah, check it out: I think I've found the ultimate in things that people on this thread will hate the living hell out of -- slumpy posture, serious fitting issues, INDIE FEET, girlish "who me" vibe:
http://www.copenhagenstreetstyle.dk/wp-content/2008/02/JPEG/gallery10.jpg
... except what's funny is that the bag, knit thing, shoes, and colors are all great, and would probably look super-awesome if things fit better, or even if she just stood up a little straighter.
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:54 (seventeen years ago)
i think he's kind of awesome but i'm really into the sweater
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:54 (seventeen years ago)
I'm on that girl's side, she's so close
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:55 (seventeen years ago)
I don't mind her attitude.
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:55 (seventeen years ago)
haha nabisco otm but damn it wld be great if none of that were affectation
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:56 (seventeen years ago)
she reminds me of this lady:
http://bp1.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/R70rkVmJ1CI/AAAAAAAADAw/-M4-UBujIRY/s1600-h/RCLonweb.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:59 (seventeen years ago)
she's got a weird juno-esque pregnant 16 yo vibe
― bell_labs, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:59 (seventeen years ago)
I would never wear a shirt this big untucked, so ... why does it look so good on this guy? Is it possible that the 80s outline of wide-in-the-middle and tapering pants is starting to look okay again for MEN, too?
http://www.copenhagenstreetstyle.dk/wp-content/2008/02/JPEG/gallery02.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 18:59 (seventeen years ago)
p.s. -- what is indie feet?
nabisco that guy looks completely boring in a boring way
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:00 (seventeen years ago)
http://store.vesterheim.org/images/products/jpg/1298-color.jpg
― Laurel, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:00 (seventeen years ago)
Indie feet = toes pigeon-pointed toward each other in a mix of "aww shucks" and defensive/guarded stance, as ably demonstrated by JUNO on the cover of Entertainment Weekly -- INDIE FEET!
http://bp2.blogger.com/_jbjeifmkUFc/R6XCZCMvOYI/AAAAAAAAAJw/uoFRRqJ7OEg/s400/feb082008_977_lg.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:03 (seventeen years ago)
nooooooo
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:04 (seventeen years ago)
P.S. Maybe if we put a DEAD HAMSTER on that guy's throat you'll like him better, but I also like looking at people-on-street blogs out of interest in normal-ass things I might normal-ass wear on normal-ass days
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:04 (seventeen years ago)
i think he looks quiet netherlands artist/poet c.2001
P.S. I think it's a testament to my upthread comment that a guy wearing a big button-down shirt untucked and with slightly tapering pants more or less pegged up toward his calves reads "boring" -- that would not have been nearly true a few years back, no?
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:06 (seventeen years ago)
indie feet is kind of a variation on red carpet feet (one foot pointed to the side, out in front of the other).
― lauren, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:08 (seventeen years ago)
hey, i got no problem with dressing down and casual duds, i just don't think that guy looks good in those clothes, or he wears them in a way that is not flattering but he somehow manages to look affected at the same time (pinroll cuffs, hat)
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:09 (seventeen years ago)
I don't mind any of it except the tucked cuffs! I think he looks non-descript but comfy and possib like he COULD be stylish if he wanted to (the hangover-day outfit that still says "I'M CHOOSING TO LOOK LIKE THIS, MY OTHER OUTFIT IS A ROLLING STREET STYLE" is highly underrated, I think). The long feet flapping out from the tight ankles, though, is upsetting my sense of proportion (and of the ridiculous).
― Laurel, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:13 (seventeen years ago)
The Estonia blog is all just pictures of people in big coats now.
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:25 (seventeen years ago)
Maybe there was some kind of competition where people were asked to demonstrate that while Izzard looks weird and tacky, it's not his style that's the problem, but rather the execution:
http://www.hel-looks.com/photos/20080209_05.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:30 (seventeen years ago)
In this case the execution is, I hope, imminent.
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:31 (seventeen years ago)
Maybe there was OMG GRIMACE, I LOVE YOU GRIMACE
http://www.hel-looks.com/?p=image/archives/1/20080209_03/
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:32 (seventeen years ago)
i don't want to become the resident hater on this thread, i think i may have been prejudiced by the fact that dude is obviously at the MAGIC trade show in Vegas which is reliably chock fulla douchebags
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:32 (seventeen years ago)
Don't worry, elmo, I think I'm already the resident hatah.
― Laurel, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:33 (seventeen years ago)
what are some decent jeans i should buy
― deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:34 (seventeen years ago)
Hel-looks is just a treasure-zone of awesomeness, good god:
Henna-Melina (15) "My style is punk. I protest against the authorities and the establishment."
Linda (27) "Boredom and Moomins inspire me."
^^ inventor of ILX?
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:34 (seventeen years ago)
^^^
xp to deej
― Jordan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:35 (seventeen years ago)
Hahah I saw Henna-Melina yesterday and laffed.
― Laurel, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:35 (seventeen years ago)
because browsing through hel-looks is not about being a hater and judging clothes, it is about wowee-zowee and the beauty of weird translations and hoping to spot Tuomas
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:37 (seventeen years ago)
Laurel, did you like the really striking gold poncho on the one girl?
Did Tuomas ever show up there
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:40 (seventeen years ago)
The yellow and black Chinoiserie one? I thought the lines were good-ish and the slim all-black outfit was what you would have to wear to balance out the poncho. I don't think it's brilliant, altho the crazy textile is def a power piece to own.
― Laurel, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:42 (seventeen years ago)
But I look like shit today so who cares? :D
― Laurel, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:43 (seventeen years ago)
- "Next I would like to buy American Apparel jersey dresses with a low back – in the spirit of early Beverly Hills, 90210."- "I play punk rock in Chungin + The Strap-on Faggot."
- "I play punk rock in Chungin + The Strap-on Faggot."
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:45 (seventeen years ago)
I think this guy was at Niagara on Sunday night:
http://www.hel-looks.com/photos/20080126_03.jpg
― Laurel, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:46 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.hel-looks.com/photos/20080116_01.jpg
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:47 (seventeen years ago)
Is that dress from Laura Ashley?
― Laurel, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:48 (seventeen years ago)
Just kidding, she looks like a nice girl.
so i didn't win the fur bow tie but i did pick up a pretty nice double-breasted trench coat for $20
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:49 (seventeen years ago)
not on ebay tho, at the store
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:50 (seventeen years ago)
so no jean recommends?
― deej, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:50 (seventeen years ago)
deej, you could go to my friend's uncle's partner's store downtown, where they've got jeans with no brands and no price tags. it's like custom famous people shit, $$$$$$.
― Jordan, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:52 (seventeen years ago)
L, I believe she says she steals clothes from her aunt? I kinda really like how she dresses like that and still looks sharp/stylish, rather than frumpy or period-piece or grandma's-closet-bag-lady.
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:54 (seventeen years ago)
I like the pieces individually even though I'm having trouble with the "I wd wear all this dark neutrals together" point of view. I'd never call it "sharp", though. She looks like a good editorial assistant -- which may in fact be exactly what she is!!
― Laurel, Thursday, 21 February 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)
I don't know if I like every single piece of this, but I'd like to be this kick-ass when I'm 60. Fuck.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2382/2189911741_dd48bebcca_o.jpg
― Laurel, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:16 (seventeen years ago)
Also I would knife this one for the dress but the stain would never come out. Also I would look about 7 in it. Too bad.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2178/1802759015_39ad67abac_o.jpg
― Laurel, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:19 (seventeen years ago)
apc, levis
― sleep, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:20 (seventeen years ago)
That's a dress?
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:27 (seventeen years ago)
No, yr right: the orig image was smaller. Looks like two pieces from here.
― Laurel, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:28 (seventeen years ago)
"Dubstep inspires me." --Jonna (23)
― sleep, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:30 (seventeen years ago)
So you can knife her through the shirt and find a similar one, easy!
― nabisco, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:30 (seventeen years ago)
red laces in docs = no polka dot skirt = yes
― jergïns, Thursday, 21 February 2008 20:41 (seventeen years ago)
elmo, I was racking my brain trying to come up with the name of the ILXor I had in mind to complete a joke about who stole your fur bowtie, but then I realized that the person I meant...was you.
― roxymuzak, Friday, 22 February 2008 06:12 (seventeen years ago)
the halifax thing upthread is depressing, though it's more of a representation of how people dress here than it is of well-dressed people. the euro-trash on hel-looks is depressing for altogether different reasons.
― LaMonte, Friday, 22 February 2008 06:36 (seventeen years ago)
There is nothing remotely depressing about the people on hel-looks!
― nabisco, Friday, 22 February 2008 07:38 (seventeen years ago)
Y
http://bp3.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/R7stPVmJ08I/AAAAAAAADAA/TXrjkAbnr34/s1600/Yellglovesweb.jpg
― nabisco, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:36 (seventeen years ago)
I'm getting annoyed with street style sites that, instead of saying "LOOK AT THIS RLY STYLISH PERSON, LET'S HAVE A MINUTE OF SILENCE" are just a reflection of what average people are wearing. If I wanted to know what boring people wear, I'd google-image search crowd scenes.
― Laurel, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:48 (seventeen years ago)
There was one for a city, I think in South America, that I'd never even heard of, and I was like "Wow! Total new exposure!" but it was pretty much someone's friends at a party.
― Laurel, Friday, 22 February 2008 19:50 (seventeen years ago)
I kinda like that, often -- it means that instead of feeling like I'll never make enough money or spend enough time shopping to dress as well as I'd like, I can just notice interesting ways people are wearing sweaters or cuffing trousers, and think about trying them sometime.
Cf the normal-looking guy I posted upthread, where my reaction was seriously along the lines of "I'd never have thought you could untuck a shirt that big and not look a bit silly"
― nabisco, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:01 (seventeen years ago)
I mean, that's half the point of these things, for me
― nabisco, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:02 (seventeen years ago)
It was summer in Brazil, everyone was wearing Tshirts and gold necklaces. The girls had cut their Ts to fall off one shoulder. Apparently "Curitiba" is the capitol city of Long Island now.
― Laurel, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:13 (seventeen years ago)
i like that poem
― rrrobyn, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:23 (seventeen years ago)
Hm, sorry, I seem to have lied. The Curitiba blog is all right, I wonder which one was so bad...pretty sure it was in SA.
― Laurel, Friday, 22 February 2008 20:23 (seventeen years ago)
I love the new
Building New Condos look.
― felicity, Thursday, 28 February 2008 04:32 (seventeen years ago)
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/02/20/fashion/22076113.JPG
The flourescent makes it.
― felicity, Thursday, 28 February 2008 04:33 (seventeen years ago)
"Is that cat mounting a pigeon?" vs. "This is where we're going to put the Jacuzzi."
Nothing can save those shoes.
― Lamp, Thursday, 28 February 2008 04:48 (seventeen years ago)
clown timberlands
― Hurting 2, Thursday, 28 February 2008 04:50 (seventeen years ago)
I like the coat on the left and the spray-painted plywood on the right. The rest is noise.
― felicity, Thursday, 28 February 2008 04:52 (seventeen years ago)
"This bag isn't gay-looking enough. Let me hold it more delicately."
― Hurting 2, Thursday, 28 February 2008 04:54 (seventeen years ago)
hideous
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:11 (seventeen years ago)
The suspenders are okay. Also: Hipster men and testosterone (or lack thereof) [Started by wants to know, last updated 1 minute ago] 108 new answers
― Lamp, Thursday, 28 February 2008 05:18 (seventeen years ago)
YOU FORGOT TO WEAR PANTS rant of the day:
oh man. what drives a girl to wear fishnets and NO PANTS when it's like 20 degrees out, and GO ON THE SUBWAY at 11 oclock at night. we were standing waiting for the train and she walked by, and some guy standed by us turned around and gaped at her and turned to us and was like "what the fuck was THAT?!"
― bell_labs, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:34 (seventeen years ago)
i mean, fishnets look kinda slutty with a skirt, even. fishnets with NOTHING ELSE? and in the WINTER? are you insane?
― bell_labs, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:38 (seventeen years ago)
How...how long was her coat? Was she WEARING a coat? How come you texted me about your cat and not about the pant-less hipster girl??
― Laurel, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:39 (seventeen years ago)
her coat did not go down far enough at all! it was short enough to tell she wasn't wearing a skirt, at least. i didn't really notice anything else about her outfit. she looked way more like a college student then an actual prostitute.
― bell_labs, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:42 (seventeen years ago)
this is how come cell phones have cameras ok
― jhøshea, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:45 (seventeen years ago)
― sleep, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:46 (seventeen years ago)
my cell phone doesnt have a camera lol ;_;
― bell_labs, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:49 (seventeen years ago)
just go hang out near nyu and i assure you that you will see some of these pantless girls
― bell_labs, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:50 (seventeen years ago)
should i just lean against a wall w/my arms crossed looking all casual or what?
― jhøshea, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:54 (seventeen years ago)
Mission supply list:
Sunglasses
― Laurel, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:55 (seventeen years ago)
haaaaay so i noticed you werent wearing pants...
― jhøshea, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:56 (seventeen years ago)
I'm kind of into this, but I think it's because you can't see his feet (those orange ski boots are going to kick someone's eye out...and that person will thank you).
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/02/20/fashion/22076045.JPG
― Laurel, Thursday, 28 February 2008 15:59 (seventeen years ago)
i saw several pantsless offenders* over the weekend. i thought of laurel and bell, and how outraged they would be.
*including one of my favorite types: college student from behind (long ponytail, leggings, big purse, etc), but face-lifted joan rivers lookalike from the front.
― lauren, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:02 (seventeen years ago)
Carhartt is so Kent Ave.
― felicity, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:08 (seventeen years ago)
ah! imagine how much worse this is going to get when it gets warmer.
― bell_labs, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:13 (seventeen years ago)
Hahah Carhartt is so MY DAD. And every other man who's responsible for snow-blowing the driveway.
― Laurel, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:17 (seventeen years ago)
carhartt is so warm
― max, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:18 (seventeen years ago)
carhartts are hot. they should make them in a slimmer fitting version though.
― bell_labs, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:22 (seventeen years ago)
They make women's now.
― felicity, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:32 (seventeen years ago)
Just right for Ian.
― Laurel, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:36 (seventeen years ago)
This is good news. I need new jeans because I am wearing uniqlos that make my legs look like sausages
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:55 (seventeen years ago)
Do they have little metal snaps at the end? Are they made of pig intestine?
Also could you plz post yr Fran Drescher wallpaper pic?
― Abbott, Thursday, 28 February 2008 16:58 (seventeen years ago)
here's one for nabisco... http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3094/2296053167_3a8631ed73.jpg
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:07 (seventeen years ago)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3158/2296053019_41e697826d.jpg
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:08 (seventeen years ago)
INDIE FEET
ok stupid question what is on her knees
― sleep, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:09 (seventeen years ago)
i have no idea what is on her knees!
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:10 (seventeen years ago)
paging to thread: laurel, to tell us what is on her knees jergins, because she has on red tights
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:13 (seventeen years ago)
if i see another pair of flats with little bows on the front i'm going to hurl
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:17 (seventeen years ago)
i don't mind her shoes, jumper or sweater.
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:19 (seventeen years ago)
the blouse has got to go though. and wooly grey tights would be much better. and bangs that don't look like jim carrey's in dumb & dumber pls.
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:21 (seventeen years ago)
omg that girl is so completely fucking insano
run!
― jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:23 (seventeen years ago)
i dont think the glasses she is wearing in the second pic have lenses in them.
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:24 (seventeen years ago)
plucked eye brow, dead give a way
― sexyDancer, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:27 (seventeen years ago)
Man, lately, everyone has the frills and the bows and the stripes and the precious and the too many layers and the leggings, leading me to feel like I am surrounded by BECKYS from ROSEANNE (Becky I.)
― Abbott, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:27 (seventeen years ago)
That lady is vomit hispter remix Becky I.
― Abbott, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:28 (seventeen years ago)
im enjoying the image of you at a party or wherever having the sudden realization "omg I am surrounded by BECKYS from ROSEANNE"
― jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:30 (seventeen years ago)
Here's one for Bell
http://specialfarm.net/images/bush-giving-finger.jpg
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:31 (seventeen years ago)
it looks like bra straps holding up her nonexistant socks.
― Yerac, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:31 (seventeen years ago)
and then slowly looking around the room suspiciously from becky to becky testing your theory becoming more disturbed w/each successful match
― jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:32 (seventeen years ago)
It was in class yesterday, jhoseah, and the epiphany made me feel dizzy, like some cosmic prank was being pulled on me.
― Abbott, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:32 (seventeen years ago)
l o l was thinking of class as an alternate setting
― jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:33 (seventeen years ago)
Seriously, though, something about her looks off -- I'm thinking it's that she's wearing far too much red for someone with hair that color?
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:34 (seventeen years ago)
"No one wears lace bows in their hair anymore, what is she, Becky?" "Hahaha, shit, a hoodie t-shirt with a floral skirt? Is she Becky or something?" "Sheesh, Pastel leggings and flats with bows? She's totally pulling a Becky here." oh dear God have I spoken ill of Becky I? Why are her legions of demons hainting me with their pink blush?
― Abbott, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:34 (seventeen years ago)
"Either be a NASCAR driver or don't," you know
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:35 (seventeen years ago)
nabisco! i can't imagine why you are so offended.
also, i do want a plaid jumper like that.
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:35 (seventeen years ago)
and the tights do not match anything else that she's wearing at ALL. what hath american apparel wrought.
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:36 (seventeen years ago)
I'm not offended, I just wanted to discuss the cut of Bush's suit!
I am surprised, though, that I don't like that girl's outfit, if only because it's so totally 1990s "I can't decide whether to go see Babes in Toyland or watch the Garofolo special on Comedy Central" -- it really is the color thing, I think.
This thread is hopefully circling toward an in-depth discussion of Willow's wardrobe on Buffy
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:40 (seventeen years ago)
bangs that don't look like jim carrey's in dumb & dumber pls.
bell, you make me lol!
― roxymuzak, Friday, 29 February 2008 17:49 (seventeen years ago)
I should also point out that part of why I like on-the-street blogs and not actual fashion is that I'm less interested in people looking stylish/fashionable and more interested in how people's clothes make them come off, world-wise -- which is, for instance, why I was talking about overall-dress girl upthread rather than her better-dressed friend: because something about the overall-dress outfit says stuff like "if you were at a party and didn't know anyone, I'd totally be friendly about talking to you" and "I would make a good roommate and it would probably involve baking"
Versus this girl, whose slightly "better" clothes add up to saying something more like "if you were at a party and didn't know anyone and talked to me, I would turn out to be really boring PLUS be looking over your shoulder for someone important to talk to" and "I would be a loud roommate involved in a perpetual up-and-down struggle to be cool wherein one day I yelp at you for an hour about how I hung out with a minor indie-rock bassist and then another day you have to hear a long story about how one of my friends totally 'betrayed' me"
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:29 (seventeen years ago)
^^ actually wait, I looked at the picture again and my stereotypes are slightly off
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:30 (seventeen years ago)
I hate that kind of shit, nabisco!
"I would be a loud roommate involved in a perpetual up-and-down struggle to be cool wherein one day I yelp at you for an hour about how I hung out with a minor indie-rock bassist and then another day you have to hear a long story about how one of my friends totally 'betrayed' me"
This is not a "type" of person!
― roxymuzak, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:31 (seventeen years ago)
no duh!
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:32 (seventeen years ago)
point = interested in clothing choices denoting personality beyond "fashionable" / "unfashionable," which is why I think I'm willing to like 95% of everything pictured on this thread, so long as it's like, well, that's some personality, alright
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:34 (seventeen years ago)
also: ways clothes-personality fit or relate to face-personality, which is another place where the redhead doesn't strike me as Being All She Can Be; the two seem different, somehow
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:37 (seventeen years ago)
face-personality
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:50 (seventeen years ago)
ok then what about that redhead with the grey socks that you guys all loved, she had the bitchiest looking expression ever! i would not want to have to talk to her at a party.
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:52 (seventeen years ago)
hi Bell I am every guy in the world, ask me questions about stuff
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:53 (seventeen years ago)
Anyway you should probably ignore that stuff, because I'm not confident I'll be able to explain it in any way that anyone gets: I'm not talking about who seems like a nice person or what kinds of expressions people have, I'm talking about what kind of vibe the outfits project.
And don't act like that's some kind of "guy" thing, because we had a whole thing upthread where non-guys were extrapolating vibes like "helplessness" from twee-girl -- I'm talking about that kind of implied personality of an outfit itself.
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:56 (seventeen years ago)
vibe-personality
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:57 (seventeen years ago)
i wasn't implying it was a guy thing, we are definitely all making assumptions about people's personalities based on the way they dress, pose, and hold themselves, which is the whole fun of this thread! it just seems like you don't like this girl b/c she seems like a boring bitch, which i agree with, but there were definitely other boring bitches upthread that were loved by all.
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 18:59 (seventeen years ago)
besides me. i hate the boring bitches.
nabisco im sort of tempted to post pictures of my friends on this thread and have you "type" them
― max, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:00 (seventeen years ago)
go!
― jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:00 (seventeen years ago)
Hi guys, sorry I'm late. I'm almost positive she's wearing sock garters for no reason, because they don't appear to be holding anything up (unless her calves came disconnected from her shins, which I have felt like that a lot lately, so one never knows....).
― Laurel, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:03 (seventeen years ago)
Aww, I don't think anyone's a boring bitch! Seriously, my main thoughts on her are (a) she's wearing too much red for someone with hair that color, and (b) her face is appealing in a way that her clothes do not match or live up to.
And Max I'm not typing people, I'm typing how outfits make them look! Beyond which that "at a party" stuff was mostly just a gag about those two in particular.
I never said anything about that one girl other than that she was wearing grey socks: the loved-by-all action consisted mostly of other guys coming through and saying she was hot, in a way that was totally not complimentary of her outfit, insofar as they sounded like they'd prefer it not-on (although I'm sure some of them would have kept the socks)
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:05 (seventeen years ago)
Someone should ban me from this thread
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:06 (seventeen years ago)
Re her overall look, I'm sort of over the "small child playing dress-up" thing, and you know I adore vintage styles but you have to draw the line somewhere, and if that line is the Brooklyn Bridge she's somewhere on Freeman St.
I like her face and hair, though, so it's kind of a shame.
xp BANNED
― Laurel, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:07 (seventeen years ago)
no but i laughed at it and i want you to do it for my friends
― max, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:07 (seventeen years ago)
i laughed at it to!
can someone explain to me the appeal of footless socks? how do they stay on your feet, what is the point? et etc http://i.americanapparel.net/storefront/images/detail/serve.asp?media=RSASKOPKF_Plum.jpg
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:08 (seventeen years ago)
HA! That girl is from Providence and has a whole blog where she puts her daily outfits. Is that where you found the pics?
― ENBB, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:09 (seventeen years ago)
I like her face and hair, though -- yeah see she has a really elegant head, her clothes should play up to it!
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:10 (seventeen years ago)
Footless socks: No idea. They stay on all right as long as you leave enough slack under your arches (like legwarmers and dance tights w/ split feet) but I have zero idea why anyone'd wear them outside a studio. Which I'm sure means that American Apparel will make a killing.
― Laurel, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:10 (seventeen years ago)
xxxpost it was like the nabisco version of do's and don'ts
― max, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:10 (seventeen years ago)
no! i saw it posted elsewhere. what is the blog called?
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:11 (seventeen years ago)
i kind of like the color of those socks, but i wish they had feet :(
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:13 (seventeen years ago)
http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c287/expatrica/k.jpg
Ok, I was wrong - other stuff on blog too but LOTS of outfit pictures and indie poses.
http://kore.livejournal.com/
― ENBB, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:13 (seventeen years ago)
nabisco dos and donts plz
― deej, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:14 (seventeen years ago)
Oh please.
xp re photo
― Laurel, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:14 (seventeen years ago)
ugh providence
― max, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:15 (seventeen years ago)
jho: what did you think this thread was for?
― Laurel, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:15 (seventeen years ago)
Maybe the toes are sold separately, in a whole other color palette
AA's been kinda smart on increasingly just selling $10-$15 things people are going to treat as accessories, like socks / tights / scarves / fake glasses -- I'm just hoping this doesn't spread any further onto the men's side
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:16 (seventeen years ago)
i like the colors/width/material of AA's ties but i cant really justify spending 18 bucks on what i tell myself i could probably figure out how to sew in an afternoon
― max, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:17 (seventeen years ago)
wow.
http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c287/expatrica/woah.jpg
― ENBB, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:18 (seventeen years ago)
oh she's a livejournal girl who posts pictures of herself...that's a whole different subset of weird annoying girl!
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:19 (seventeen years ago)
nabisco u should have picked up on that!
― max, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:20 (seventeen years ago)
"I, for one, welcome the Dresden Dolls"
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:20 (seventeen years ago)
Hahahaa. BL, you speak the truth.
― ENBB, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:21 (seventeen years ago)
I don't know where she's getting the pieces, but she does have quite a wardrobe. Unfortunately it's not making her any less annoying, although if she's under 22 I might have to just let it go because what else are you supposed to do at that age?
― Laurel, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:24 (seventeen years ago)
Those AA footless socks are just Prada knock offs, which I got a knockoff knee hi in that color palette with the feet attached from Tabio, but it looks like they don;t have them anymore.
― Yerac, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:25 (seventeen years ago)
I could be wrong but I'm fairly certain she's well over 22 (closer to 30). xpost.
― ENBB, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:25 (seventeen years ago)
I was born in a California port town bordering the Pacific Ocean. I grew up in a valley near the sea, scrambling through the chaparrall after lizards and bounding between rocks in the barranca. I was a voracious reader, staying up late reading by the cerulean light of the public access channel. Curently I am pursuing an MFA in Fiction at Brown University.
from her website
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:26 (seventeen years ago)
it's what the internet is for
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:26 (seventeen years ago)
part of the internet
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:27 (seventeen years ago)
I was a voracious reader, staying up late reading by the cerulean light of the public access channel. Curently I am pursuing an MFA in Fiction at Brown University.
Curently I am pursuing an MFA in Fiction at Brown University. Curently I am pursuing an MFA in Fiction at Brown University. Curently I am pursuing an MFA in Fiction at Brown University.
― max, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:28 (seventeen years ago)
She's wearing those stupid sock garters in this picture, too:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2357/2292194666_62c5068f10.jpg
― roxymuzak, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:29 (seventeen years ago)
Okay, doing that kind of thing in the social context of a top-flight MFA program is incredible-strange, and her use of "cerulean" in that sentence is freaking awful, but the Brown MFA wait-listed me, so I guess I have to bow down and admit she wins
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:29 (seventeen years ago)
See, the dress w white cuffs is the first thing of hers I've actually liked. And I like it quite a lot. Maybe she'll be awesome when she's 30.
― Laurel, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:30 (seventeen years ago)
If she lives that long.
Then again, Brown's aesthetic agenda self-selects a mix of people who are really good and people who are just weirdos but put together an application that seemed like it had something important in there, for a second
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:31 (seventeen years ago)
u mad
― roxymuzak, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:32 (seventeen years ago)
And you accused the "non-guys" of making shit up? Didn't I already ban you?
― Laurel, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:33 (seventeen years ago)
it's spelled CHAPARRAL
also she is a retard
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:33 (seventeen years ago)
???
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:34 (seventeen years ago)
labs otm
― roxymuzak, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:35 (seventeen years ago)
i'm parsing her paragraph up there.
I was born in a California port town bordering the Pacific Ocean.
as opposed to a port town in california on the baltic sea?! bang bang
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:35 (seventeen years ago)
you guys are so mean
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:36 (seventeen years ago)
labs def otm.
I would LOVE to see her in some of these outfits with captions about her influences a la Hel-looks but I'm too tired and burnt out to think of anything clever right now.
Also, I am a bitch. That said it's just so pretentious. I hate that shit.
― ENBB, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:37 (seventeen years ago)
For some reason I only find her useful if she is also a lesbian.
― Yerac, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:38 (seventeen years ago)
I'm totally mean, but I think I gave her the only vote of confidence on this thread, so I'm not being completely heartless. I haven't tried to read her blog, though.
― Laurel, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:39 (seventeen years ago)
oh no i mean that the meanness is part of the thread by necessity. also the meanest i've been in the last few weeks was towards the woman who won for screenplay of 'juno' which might as well have had the word cerulean in it
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:39 (seventeen years ago)
not trying to read anyone's blog ever is probably a good idea, laurel.
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:40 (seventeen years ago)
I'm guessing she'd consider it whimsical and anti-pretense, though, that she larks around playing dress-up while her workshop friends are furiously pecking away at their keyboards
And then she strolls casually in and drops a submission on the table and Robert Coover says it's brilliant and everyone else goes GRRR
She wins us all, you know, she wins
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:40 (seventeen years ago)
which made me not like her dress/fashion xpost to self
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:41 (seventeen years ago)
If somebody photographed her on the street I'd be like OH YAWN INDIE but y'know, she's got a good eye, she's just v v young. The part where she PHOTOGRAPHS herself in poses and puts them on the internet, THAT part...that part makes bell labs otm.
― Laurel, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:41 (seventeen years ago)
I like some of the outfits and agree that she has quite a wardrobe. It's the posing and writing I can't stomach. It just seems like it takes so much effort and it's just . . . annoying.
Laurel - exactly. Although, I don't think she's that young.
― ENBB, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:42 (seventeen years ago)
"roxanne m carter is clumsy in high heels, but elegant in the water and on the internet (like swans. swans are so dashing and debonair online). she makes books with her bare hands and a power drill, and you are invited to visit her at persephassa.com."
― ENBB, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:44 (seventeen years ago)
Also, she's 28.
― ENBB, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:45 (seventeen years ago)
(P.S. oh Laurel I just figured your zing out: the only thing I accused anyone of "making up" about twee-girl was some outpouring of male desire for her, as borne out by the ancient science of counting; I didn't object to characterizations of the outfit so much as the idea that one isolated outfit necessarily had overarching implications about gender)
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:45 (seventeen years ago)
SHE'S WHAT?
― Laurel, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:47 (seventeen years ago)
I wouldn't mind the pretentiousness and the posing that much except for her artlessness and lack of mystery. Also, the TV screen ain't cerulean. It's neon blue. Barranca might be apt, though, depending on where she 'grew up'.
― Michael White, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:48 (seventeen years ago)
i enjoy reading this thread from the cerulean glow of my laptop
― max, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:48 (seventeen years ago)
She's a grad student, Laurel!
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:48 (seventeen years ago)
http://bp0.blogger.com/_K_Rogf1DbcI/R8Ubz0FaLbI/AAAAAAAABHo/sea7rqgDltc/s1600/SNB12756.JPG
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:49 (seventeen years ago)
We lose. http://persephassa.com/humanflower/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=8686&g2_serialNumber=1
― sexyDancer, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:49 (seventeen years ago)
she also misspelled "currently"
― max, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:50 (seventeen years ago)
you guys are such softies about being mean to people who make shrines to themselves on the internet
plus brown took her over nabisco so we owe to him as friends to be mean
^^ PREVIOUS IMAGE NSFW, THANKS A LOT
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:50 (seventeen years ago)
http://idletigers.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/goatboy2.jpg?w=186&h=540
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:50 (seventeen years ago)
She's retarded.
XP OMG BUCKTS ARE THE SPRING HANDBAG
― Laurel, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:51 (seventeen years ago)
she is unhealthily self-involved and convinced of her own brilliance. which always bugs the shit out of me, but it's those types that often get ahead in their creative ventures.
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:51 (seventeen years ago)
NOT HANDMADE BUT STILL GOOD american apparel calico the carrot box divine debris eggling fancy jewelry lullie clothing mr boots paper-doll pare umbrella plastica sock-dreams the vintage queen thriftwares timeless vixen
― sexyDancer, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:52 (seventeen years ago)
Also kudos to rrobyn for finding an excellent example of sock-garters hard at work actually KEEPING SOCKS UP.
― Laurel, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:52 (seventeen years ago)
(Eh, Max, I don't think I'm a sufficiently Brown-ish writer to have done that program anyway. Besides, she has better clothes, a better camera, and more free time than me; no reason to assume she's not a better writer, too. That place is like 15 people a year, or something; I'm amazed I was even waitlisted)
BL totally OTM about let's call it "confidence" in your creativeness
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:54 (seventeen years ago)
THIS IS WHY I DONT DATE MUSICIANS anymore
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:55 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.ghillie-suits.org/images/ghillie-suit.jpg
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:56 (seventeen years ago)
I like sock-dreams but I'd like them more if I could get more of their cuet socks over my apparently enormous calves. I think their stock is sized more for Ms Pout-and-Pose up there.
― Laurel, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:56 (seventeen years ago)
look nabs i think youre a great writer, but if you really want to make it like this chick maybe you should start dressing up in frocks and taking pictures of yourself
― max, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)
cerulean was the first of daily vocabulary words in my 3rd grade
laurel what were you asking abt what i thought this thread was for?
― jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:58 (seventeen years ago)
it WOULD be pretty awesome if nabisco started wearing and documenting his gothic lolita styles
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:58 (seventeen years ago)
xp "nabisco's dos and don'ts"
― Laurel, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:58 (seventeen years ago)
The equivalent of this girl in my personal MFA program had WAY better clothes, though, actual interesting modern things with great outlines and fascinating jumpsuit-like items; I think she moved to Iceland or something.
Whereas my personal clothing hero there was just lanky and altered every bit of her clothing to fit, so she'd always be wearing button shirts that fit absurdly perfectly in every single respect; she has a book coming out soon.
This would disprove Bell's notion, except that the first of those two was not overinvolved with herself.
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 19:59 (seventeen years ago)
i dont know if youve noticed but so far today ive come up with two awesome business ventures for you nabisco--dos and donts AND nabiscowearsdresses.blogspot.com
― max, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:01 (seventeen years ago)
http://hideyourarms.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/08/frontpage-bunnysuit.jpg
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:02 (seventeen years ago)
we should have a self-congratulatory self-portrait fashion blog then talk shit abt each other in here!
― jhøshea, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:03 (seventeen years ago)
we should! it will keep us humble.
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:06 (seventeen years ago)
No thank you, that's what my mother is for. "Have you thought about wearing shorter necklaces than the old-lady jewelry you like? It would draw so much more attention to your face, and not to your...waist. Ahem."
― Laurel, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:09 (seventeen years ago)
Ha, I was about to sneak a picture of what I'm wearing in the work-bathroom mirror, but there were too many people around (read: 1 person) to do it
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:11 (seventeen years ago)
xposts rrrobyn what IS that!
more xposts and THAT
― roxymuzak, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:11 (seventeen years ago)
http://boolah.dupadee.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/spacesuits.jpg
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:13 (seventeen years ago)
GHILLIE SUITS AND SPACEMAN SUITS THEY ARE THE ONLYY WAAY
i'm about to order some tights. should i get olive or graphite for my 3rd pair? was considering watermelon, but when do i EVER wear pink?
― lauren, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:14 (seventeen years ago)
graphite!
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:14 (seventeen years ago)
then you will be able to draw with them! instead of just put them in martinis
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:15 (seventeen years ago)
i was just thinking about ordering tights too. that sock-dreams website really is something!
― bell_labs, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:16 (seventeen years ago)
i'm using foot traffic.
― lauren, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:17 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.bartlesvillehistory.com/images/timeline/full/1934.jpg
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:18 (seventeen years ago)
l-r: Nabisco, Max, Rrrobyn, Elmo
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:32 (seventeen years ago)
i'm pretty into the boots and the head bucket
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:45 (seventeen years ago)
bucket fashion you heard it here first
You know, I think I did first learn about Buckethead from ILM
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 20:59 (seventeen years ago)
http://sunboar.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/vending-machine-dress-01.jpg
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 21:20 (seventeen years ago)
That outfit looks very REFRESHING
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 21:22 (seventeen years ago)
could you say it displays a ... bubbly personality?
― deej, Friday, 29 February 2008 21:24 (seventeen years ago)
probably lots of fun at a party but possibly a bitch hard to call
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 21:29 (seventeen years ago)
(rrrobyn watched me slide to the dark side and said nothing)
― nabisco, Friday, 29 February 2008 21:33 (seventeen years ago)
not as good as this http://www.geocities.com/stalker217/ghillie/images/back1.JPG
xpost i said things with jpgs
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 21:35 (seventeen years ago)
this i mean is what is not as good as this http://www.geocities.com/stalker217/ghillie/images/back1.JPG which is important to see and not all jpgs are seeable sometimes
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 21:50 (seventeen years ago)
yeah i'm pretty ready for this day to be over
― rrrobyn, Friday, 29 February 2008 21:51 (seventeen years ago)
Oh hey, much-discussed girl is a poetry MFA, which makes it all about 300 times more sensible.
Also she has some nice non-"photo dress-up" clothes, too:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3087/2293817961_2f676e4289.jpg
― nabisco, Sunday, 2 March 2008 00:57 (seventeen years ago)
(Note: I'm not spending my weekend internet-stalking, or anything, I just didn't bother looking at her website at work, when we were actually talking about this.) (P.S. seriously it's like a Dresden Dolls promotional item over there)
― nabisco, Sunday, 2 March 2008 00:59 (seventeen years ago)
rrobyn that is so cute
― youn, Sunday, 2 March 2008 01:15 (seventeen years ago)
wtf i keep getting outbid on bowties, so not fair! i just want to look odd and foppish but i am repeatedly thwarted.
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:30 (seventeen years ago)
I have a Colonel tie but I have no occasion on which to wear it. I thought it would be cool to wear bolo ties as necklaces but in fact I just felt silly doing it, like in that Ramona Quimby book where she unsuccessfully tries to start a trend of wearing banana stickers on your forehead.
― Abbott, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 17:39 (seventeen years ago)
http://bp1.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R88Bo2HptII/AAAAAAAAG1Y/bz1qmYScaUg/s1600-h/IMG_4979.jpg
^^^ belted blazer on a dude? ok, but only because you're such a skinny bony creature and could wear anything at all
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:39 (seventeen years ago)
Soooooooo gay. Also with the smoking slippers/loafers.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:40 (seventeen years ago)
i was about to say, wtf @ crown shoes!
― deej, Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:42 (seventeen years ago)
hey guys, i am wearing red pants!
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 15:10 (seventeen years ago)
talk about GAY.
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 15:16 (seventeen years ago)
But I wear read pants all the oh geez
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:02 (seventeen years ago)
RED, pardon
― nabisco, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:03 (seventeen years ago)
http://bp1.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/R8_mb03RL-I/AAAAAAAADEA/077Z7ENuR3I/s1600-h/Overcoatweb.jpg
love this whole look ^^^
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:31 (seventeen years ago)
i hate how those pants fit
― deej, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:34 (seventeen years ago)
sweater on bare skin is tuff
― sexyDancer, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:37 (seventeen years ago)
just countering the super-skinny fit, i would prefer the silhouette to be more tapered on the bottom, too, but on him it works (again, on a wispy slip of a man, of course it does) xpost
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:39 (seventeen years ago)
if it is cold enough for a coat it is cold enough to wear a shirt under one's v-neck sweater. tie optional.
― adam, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:42 (seventeen years ago)
Looks like the Luxembourg Gardens.
― Michael White, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:44 (seventeen years ago)
oh sure, but then, he would not enjoy the delicious creamy softness of cashmere against his skin. xpost
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 6 March 2008 16:46 (seventeen years ago)
http://bp3.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R9Gbkd2jMSI/AAAAAAAAG2I/wgnSmqOwLTU/s1600-h/IMG_5292.jpg
this is a wig, y/n?
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 March 2008 21:59 (seventeen years ago)
-- adam, Thursday, March 6, 2008 10:42 AM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link
could be wearing a beater
― deej, Friday, 7 March 2008 23:35 (seventeen years ago)
zatanna is alive and well in reykjavik
http://bp1.blogger.com/_kqtCX8rtWOI/R9fUeBJAc5I/AAAAAAAABjE/z8DI864i-lA/s1600-h/CIMG0237.JPG
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:28 (seventeen years ago)
i kinda like the use of a thin looped belt as neckwear (problematic association to dog collar notwithstanding):
http://bp0.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R9fT1N2jNVI/AAAAAAAAG-M/kI55nGmFUG8/s1600-h/IMG_6567.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:32 (seventeen years ago)
this contrast-collar bib-front shirt: new wave classic? or something only jack white could wear?
http://bp2.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R9Zil92jNRI/AAAAAAAAG9s/lH9MMof-MeY/s1600-h/IMG_6358.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:35 (seventeen years ago)
that dog collar business is aight by me
― gff, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:37 (seventeen years ago)
Oh I like the belt collar VERY much, and her total look (what we can see).
― Laurel, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 14:59 (seventeen years ago)
The fully buttoned Oxfordish shirt with the collar stood up and the odd double buttons are screaming '80s suburban aspirations to new wave, and it hits me right where I used to dress.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 15:01 (seventeen years ago)
oh -- i didn't notice the button detail, but it makes adds some subtle interest to an otherwise standard-looking shirt
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 15:09 (seventeen years ago)
That's kind of the point, those are the clothes that are ALMOST traditional but just slightly of their own time in some detail, that your mother doesn't mind buying but you think you can subvert when she's not looking (ie on the bus on the way to school).
― Laurel, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 15:14 (seventeen years ago)
How do I shot yellow sneakers for spring? I can't find the right pair.. I want something that is bright pale lemon and/or slightly neon yellow on white, maybe some gray in there is OK too..
― daria-g, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 19:25 (seventeen years ago)
I used to have Reebok hi-tops with the double velcro straps in an icy lemon sherbet color. Speaking of the '80s.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 19:27 (seventeen years ago)
ha. i had pink ones, dark mint green ones, and white ones with purple striped laces/purple terrycloth lining.
― lauren, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 19:38 (seventeen years ago)
a friend of mine actually bought a pair of the pink ones a few years ago, saying how good they'd look in the summer with tanned legs. i don't think they've ever even made it out of the box.
― lauren, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 19:40 (seventeen years ago)
I saw a couple teenagers on the dc metrobus yesterday with fat gold chains (I mean ridiculously so), slightly acid washed jeans, neon jackets, and vintage high tops.. one of them had Reebok pump sneakers on.. do they even make those any more or were they old stock? it was awesome.
― daria-g, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 19:43 (seventeen years ago)
my friend got hers new from foot locker (i think).
― lauren, Wednesday, 12 March 2008 19:44 (seventeen years ago)
ok i know this sweater is corny but i'm totally digging on it
http://bp3.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R-K734tEV2I/AAAAAAAAHD0/gULnLAHaRC0/s1600-h/IMG_9303.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:32 (seventeen years ago)
Why is he wearing his dowry?
― Michael White, Thursday, 20 March 2008 21:33 (seventeen years ago)
hey asshole: that's not a bow tie
http://bp3.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R-f59otEWQI/AAAAAAAAHHE/RgiH1d0aXjo/s1600-h/IMG_0539.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 24 March 2008 19:22 (seventeen years ago)
ew
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 24 March 2008 19:29 (seventeen years ago)
Oh, Elmo, but he's so cute. Look at that tiny mouth and the ultra-straight eyebrows. I vote that the tied tie is a joke on the institution of the tie.
― Laurel, Monday, 24 March 2008 19:29 (seventeen years ago)
Not a very funny or clever one, maybe, but then he is only fourteen.
― Laurel, Monday, 24 March 2008 19:30 (seventeen years ago)
it is a little fun.
― tehresa, Monday, 24 March 2008 19:33 (seventeen years ago)
if you're into choking games maybe
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 24 March 2008 19:41 (seventeen years ago)
There are a lot of people I'd like to choke, that part is true.
― Laurel, Monday, 24 March 2008 19:43 (seventeen years ago)
i'd be more sympathetic to the cheeky tie if he wasn't otherwise dressed like he was going to take my drink order
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 24 March 2008 19:44 (seventeen years ago)
"something from the bar?"
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 24 March 2008 19:45 (seventeen years ago)
Quite frankly that makes him even more attractive. For a 14-yr old.
― Laurel, Monday, 24 March 2008 19:46 (seventeen years ago)
he could take my drink order. yeah.
― tehresa, Monday, 24 March 2008 19:49 (seventeen years ago)
You are seriously suggesting that someone who DELIVERS COCKTAILS RIGHT INTO YOUR CLUTCHING HANDS would be less attractive than someone who didn't? Elmo? Dear, is that really you?
― Laurel, Monday, 24 March 2008 19:54 (seventeen years ago)
lolol truth bomb
― tehresa, Monday, 24 March 2008 19:55 (seventeen years ago)
pwned by laurel! :P
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:07 (seventeen years ago)
Not at all, you must have been having a momentary lapse of sobriety. All is forgiven.
― Laurel, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:08 (seventeen years ago)
meanwhile -- http://bp1.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R-f6KItEWRI/AAAAAAAAHHM/l5qm0G1r3mc/s1600-h/IMG_0569.jpg
this woman's jacket looks like it smells like a hot dumpster
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:09 (seventeen years ago)
is that in prague?
― bell_labs, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:11 (seventeen years ago)
it's from face hunter, which i think is london?
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:13 (seventeen years ago)
she vaguley resembles spitzer's ho
― tehresa, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:19 (seventeen years ago)
my mistake, the post headline suggests it's from sweden
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:24 (seventeen years ago)
ahh the street looks kinda like prague, and the fashion sense/high-cheekboned girl definitely does. see: http://www.madeonstreet.com/pict/230108_lucka.jpg http://www.madeonstreet.com/photo-klara-081108-6
― bell_labs, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:28 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.madeonstreet.com/pict/081107_klara.jpg
― bell_labs, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:30 (seventeen years ago)
oh eastern european fashion how are you so freakin hilarious
― rrrobyn, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:32 (seventeen years ago)
Yes but can I also point out that both of those girls are TOTALLY SMOKING HOT regardless of what they're wearing?
― Laurel, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:45 (seventeen years ago)
yeah, czech women are, pretty much uniformly, ridiculously hot. it's not fair.
― bell_labs, Monday, 24 March 2008 20:50 (seventeen years ago)
haha but it only makes the fashion more hilarious!
i am mean
― rrrobyn, Monday, 24 March 2008 21:07 (seventeen years ago)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3159/2295372465_f19d060817.jpg
― Electronic Bugaloo, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 04:28 (seventeen years ago)
yes more or less but legs all wrong hair okay imagined watch okay
― youn, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 04:31 (seventeen years ago)
that would be really hot if the skirt didn't look too small due to pulling from buttons down.
― tehresa, Tuesday, 25 March 2008 04:31 (seventeen years ago)
http://bp2.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R-mZv4tEWYI/AAAAAAAAHIE/ADpUTZbzBWo/s1600-h/IMG_0996.jpg
1000x yes
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 12:43 (seventeen years ago)
laurel is gonna go nuts over this guy
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 13:59 (seventeen years ago)
I don't think he plays for my team, but I'm enjoying the red socks and work boots.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 14:26 (seventeen years ago)
i don't know, he might just be euro?
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 14:27 (seventeen years ago)
Also I never really thought about it but I guess you can have colored rims if you're using a coaster brake! That's a lot of green on that bike. Purdy.
xp Maybe! The rosy cheeks are awfully delicious, either way.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 14:28 (seventeen years ago)
nice sweater but ew @ facial hair
― max, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 14:49 (seventeen years ago)
soulpatch is kinda eh but the whole get-up is classy fantastic
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:10 (seventeen years ago)
that guy will talk to you for hours about the difference between the POUM and the PCE
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:16 (seventeen years ago)
and about how modern agricultural advances make collectivization a priority
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:17 (seventeen years ago)
It's called "foreplay".
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:19 (seventeen years ago)
sorry every time i look at that picture the lengthy soul patch makes me want to talk to that guy even less
― max, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:21 (seventeen years ago)
"i converted my bass amplifier to run on vegetable oil"
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:23 (seventeen years ago)
― Jordan, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:24 (seventeen years ago)
i will sign his petition if he shaves that thing off
― max, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:24 (seventeen years ago)
xxp It's kind of true, he looks pretty smug/intense in that way. I'm going with "Euro" on that, though.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:24 (seventeen years ago)
he wants to beat your whites with his red wedge
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:26 (seventeen years ago)
Now you're just being gross, plus I don't even know what you're talking about.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:26 (seventeen years ago)
guys he's definitely euro (again, stockholm), stop hatin' on the man because he look good; he has obviously never played an electric bass in his life (though possibly an accordion or dobro perhaps)
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:31 (seventeen years ago)
and he very clearly is pedalling back from the fish market (fishes in satchel) to his small stone cottage that is heated by municipal geothermal energy
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:36 (seventeen years ago)
his facial hair doesn't even really bother me that much. it works with his coloring.
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:38 (seventeen years ago)
he (his clothes, bike, hair) reminds me a lot of someone i know who is in fact kind of boring
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 26 March 2008 15:50 (seventeen years ago)
we make party, ja??
http://bp0.blogger.com/_6UzdmF8O-Oo/R_PwJ4tEXCI/AAAAAAAAHNU/VCF9rjztiMA/s1600-h/IMG_3481.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 2 April 2008 21:12 (seventeen years ago)
OMG I'm wearing those exact same socks (seriously)
― nabisco, Wednesday, 2 April 2008 21:32 (seventeen years ago)
big fan of colored socks over here, although dude is too color matched, kinda tacksy
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 2 April 2008 21:37 (seventeen years ago)
Matchy matchy.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 2 April 2008 21:41 (seventeen years ago)
loloafers
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 2 April 2008 21:54 (seventeen years ago)
He looks like Super Hans from Peep Show.
― svend, Wednesday, 2 April 2008 21:55 (seventeen years ago)
moccahahasins
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 2 April 2008 21:55 (seventeen years ago)
not a fan of everything going here, but i just like this photo, it looks like they are awesome friends having aimless sunday shopping / brunching adventures
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2153/2394021093_a2be022e4d_o.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 7 April 2008 13:17 (seventeen years ago)
Ways 34 to 36 from "50 Ways to Wear Black Leggings"
I like the T-straps with leggings. Generally any kind of girl shoe with jeans.
Also +1 BIG BADGE
― felicity, Monday, 7 April 2008 13:23 (seventeen years ago)
redhead's scarf is a little too auntie anthropologie for me but it works i guess
dude's clark kent spitcurl is the key to his look, imho
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 7 April 2008 16:16 (seventeen years ago)
what is going on here???
http://bp2.blogger.com/_qjpwnPW4c1o/R_oQQmQgcLI/AAAAAAAADN8/1D5ZSQRuYEA/s1600-h/Blues%26Woodweb.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 7 April 2008 16:29 (seventeen years ago)
Mugler split-toe inspired sneaks? Otherwise the guy looks like a wrong Italian football fan with his Stone Island parka.
― suzy, Monday, 7 April 2008 16:31 (seventeen years ago)
wearing a bulletproof vest
― Gaia1981, Monday, 7 April 2008 16:36 (seventeen years ago)
Bunch of throbbing gristle wannabes xpost to elmo's prev image
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 7 April 2008 16:37 (seventeen years ago)
OMG Cosey, you are right. wow
― daria-g, Monday, 7 April 2008 17:20 (seventeen years ago)
OKAY FOLKS time to show your cards for a fashion blogroll call.
In my reader:
A Suitable Wardrobe altamira nyc Copenhagen Street Style Dam Style Dandyism.net Face Hunter fad tony HEL LOOKS In Her Eyes Le Vrai Winston Manolo for the Men Men's Flair Pike/Pine REYKJAVIK LOOKS STREET CLASH Street Fashion Copenhagen Style Salvage The Commodified the materialist The Minneapoline The Sartorialist
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 19:34 (seventeen years ago)
would love to find more sources for specifically men's style and menswear, there's a predictable lack out there
show 'em if you got 'em
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 19:36 (seventeen years ago)
you better not be holding out on me, people
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)
i just read this thread
― max, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 20:14 (seventeen years ago)
i just wish i could find some style resource for guys that splits the difference between "LIMITED COLLABORATION NIKE HYPEMONGER KANYE WEST EXCLUSIVE" and "How To Be Precisely And Correctly Attired for A Episcopal Wedding at an Ancestral Country Estate."
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 20:23 (seventeen years ago)
also, denim freaks can go fuck themselves (with exceptions and apologies for steve shasta)
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 20:27 (seventeen years ago)
elmo why dont you start one?
― max, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 20:28 (seventeen years ago)
srsly--i think youd be good at it.
i'd consider it, especially if i could get some fresh swag out of it
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 20:32 (seventeen years ago)
dude, start a tumblr
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 21:15 (seventeen years ago)
i only ever look at the sartorialist b/c i find that he's not so focused on just the young and trendy. i could see people who look like they're on the face hunter any night of week at some bar or god, even on the cobrasnake (and at least he gets pics of stefano pilati getting wasted at paris fashion week)
― jaime, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 22:19 (seventeen years ago)
fashion blogroll:
sartorialist of course facehunter aesthetics + economics cafe mode (l'express.fr) the commodified kingdom of style dc goodwill fashion blog :) project beltway style bubble ugly outfits new york refinery29 fashiontoast panda head
― daria-g, Tuesday, 8 April 2008 22:36 (seventeen years ago)
OMG hahahahahulghfulghfghjvk
http://bp3.blogger.com/_-69dNNG-4jM/R_2HxL3EOCI/AAAAAAAAAfo/h5xWhli_oFg/s1600-h/DSC_0269.JPG
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 10 April 2008 13:07 (seventeen years ago)
^ love that.
supertalk.superfuture.com and styleforum.net are the only two i can add (forums not blogs, but plenty of user posted photos).
<i>i just wish i could find some style resource for guys that splits the difference between "LIMITED COLLABORATION NIKE HYPEMONGER KANYE WEST EXCLUSIVE" and "How To Be Precisely And Correctly Attired for A Episcopal Wedding at an Ancestral Country Estate."</i>
me too. supertalk's about as close as i've found (although still veers into hypebeast territory too)
― __CB__, Thursday, 10 April 2008 14:28 (seventeen years ago)
a lot of the guys on superfuture are pretty well put together, but they put such a premium on the designer label it makes me squeamish. plenty of trustfund kids without an ounce of imagination or personal style all aping each other in $150 flannel shirts and commenting on the fit of each others' jeans. insanity.
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 10 April 2008 16:29 (seventeen years ago)
i just had to look at "ugly outfits nyc" just to make sure i hadnt been featured on it
― bell_labs, Thursday, 10 April 2008 16:31 (seventeen years ago)
and yet, i still check the WAYWT thread there on the regular. vice dos & don'ts, too.
(i do not have tiny fashion-boy lady-hips and am just envious? maybe perhaps yes)
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 10 April 2008 16:34 (seventeen years ago)
Ugly Outfits is cheap-shotty, but slightly less cheap-shotty than I'd have expected. (I suppose they don't have the Vice option of making some of their actual-weirdos DOs, just to keep you interested.)
― nabisco, Thursday, 10 April 2008 17:38 (seventeen years ago)
oh, I forgot Vice do's and don'ts! I used to read that but always wary of pulling up Vice site @ work. also, thefashionspot.com, esp the "what are you wearing" thread http://thefashionspot.com/forums/f58/
― daria-g, Thursday, 10 April 2008 18:31 (seventeen years ago)
ROFFLE MOW @ people crossposting their "what do you look like" pics on 3 separate forums
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 10 April 2008 18:37 (seventeen years ago)
srsly who are these people?
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 10 April 2008 18:43 (seventeen years ago)
okay this guy's blog is in swedish but who cares? dude is as classy as a champagne toast.
http://singular.blogg.se/
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 10 April 2008 19:41 (seventeen years ago)
a lot of the guys on superfuture are pretty well put together, but they put such a premium on the designer label it makes me squeamish. plenty of trustfund kids without an ounce of imagination or personal style all aping each other in i50 flannel shirts and commenting on the fit of each others' jeans. insanity.
totally. its scary looking at the recent purchases thread and seeing how much money some of these guys are dropping on clothes each month.
i'd forgotten about vice do's and dont's - some of the comments were funny, but its not for me from a fashion-inspiration point of view.
― __CB__, Friday, 11 April 2008 14:43 (seventeen years ago)
Walking around some parts of Manhattan I feel almost uncomfortable for not looking expensive. High fashion always co-opted bohemian style but now I feel like it's REPLACED bohemian style.
― Hurting 2, Friday, 11 April 2008 14:47 (seventeen years ago)
Elmo that guy is so sharp and it's intimidating. Wow.
― ENBB, Friday, 11 April 2008 14:49 (seventeen years ago)
To sum up current Manhattan style: tall dudes wearing hyper tapered jeans, boat shoes, and plaid. Of course, each piece costs about $400 and is imported from Sweden or Japan. I think I saw about 40 of those dudes within a 3 block radius yesterday.
― burt_stanton, Friday, 11 April 2008 14:51 (seventeen years ago)
ladies and gentlemen
― max, Friday, 11 April 2008 14:57 (seventeen years ago)
What? Do you even live here?
― burt_stanton, Friday, 11 April 2008 14:58 (seventeen years ago)
burt_stanton i AM YOU
― max, Friday, 11 April 2008 15:00 (seventeen years ago)
if by "boat shoes" you mean those flimsy white cloth shoes with soles as thick as a piece of paper and which get dirty in approx 2 seconds, that's been default hipster dude-wear in london for like three years now (at least?)
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 11 April 2008 15:12 (seventeen years ago)
hmm just done a search and i don't think "boat shoes" is what i'm talking about, boat shoes appear to be something very close to plain old Vans
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 11 April 2008 15:15 (seventeen years ago)
yeah, I assumed he meant those (usually) light-colored plain canvas shoes
― Hurting 2, Friday, 11 April 2008 15:16 (seventeen years ago)
No way, boat shoes man. Trust me
― burt_stanton, Friday, 11 April 2008 15:17 (seventeen years ago)
you mean like top-siders?
― Hurting 2, Friday, 11 April 2008 15:18 (seventeen years ago)
i have some Henri Lloyd "boat shoes" that i bought for 25 euro in Italy two years ago and they are the biz
/ j. peterman jr.
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 11 April 2008 15:22 (seventeen years ago)
what ARE those flimsy white shoes called??
http://www.oconnellsclothing.com/ftp_only/Shoes%20and%20Hosiery/quoddy_trail_boat_shoes.jpg
― baaderonixx, Friday, 11 April 2008 15:22 (seventeen years ago)
I have been seeing various nuevo-top-sider styles around but I hadn't particularly noticed them as a high fashion thing somehow.
― Hurting 2, Friday, 11 April 2008 15:25 (seventeen years ago)
i think it's time for me to get a pair
― baaderonixx, Friday, 11 April 2008 15:32 (seventeen years ago)
boat shoes are like loafers but w/ laces and more casual. you wear them on boats.
― max, Friday, 11 April 2008 15:34 (seventeen years ago)
Boating shoes, also known as boat shoes and deck shoes: similar to a loafer, but more casual. Laces, if present, are usually simple leather (often two-tone) with no frills. Often made of canvas or featuring a white sole. They have soft soles/heels to avoid marring or scratching a boat deck.
― max, Friday, 11 April 2008 15:35 (seventeen years ago)
I think that Sperry TopSiders are about to have what fashion people call 'a moment'. I'm after a black pair for summer shoes, and may even bust out the Bermuda bag I had when I was 14 to coordinate.
Tracer, canvas Converse? Or something similar by Raf Simons? Those canvas shoes are the official footwear of The Joiner's Arms; in fact I have just received a Bistrotheque event email that refers to that particular bit of east London btwn Shoreditch and Bethnal Green as the Fudgepacking District. This style is at least 5 years old.
I have found pix of me on party/styleblog sites before (there is one on a London site this week). Hate it because I always squint with flashpain.
― suzy, Friday, 11 April 2008 15:35 (seventeen years ago)
yeah max i get it now - i have some!!
still want to know what those mincing little disposable white cloth hipster shoes are called, they are like boat shoes for elves
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 11 April 2008 15:38 (seventeen years ago)
Often made of canvas or featuring a white sole.
Exactly - that's what I was talking about. I've seen these around a lot too.
― Hurting 2, Friday, 11 April 2008 15:39 (seventeen years ago)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2348/2080297440_9ccafd0a8a.jpg?v=0
http://footpathzeitgeist.blogspot.com/2007/12/canvas-shoes-not-so-new-frontier-of.html
i guess they're really just keds
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 11 April 2008 16:21 (seventeen years ago)
also appropriate for boats, but yeah
― sexyDancer, Friday, 11 April 2008 16:32 (seventeen years ago)
AAAARGH you did not say they had laces, necessarily.
― suzy, Friday, 11 April 2008 16:33 (seventeen years ago)
PLIMSOLL
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 11 April 2008 16:41 (seventeen years ago)
i thought the topsiders thing has been happening in NYC here, though prob not in UK yet? I thought about getting a pair & my best friend was like oh hell no.. but I am in DC so pretty much nothing super preppy looks anything but.. super preppy
― daria-g, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:07 (seventeen years ago)
I've mostly been wearing these early 90's J Crew black oxford shoes I got off ebay.. but won't work for summer of course. maybe will buy a pair of bright keds (I searched for plimsolls a couple months ago & you can't buy in US?) for warm weather.. I also plan to wear these stephane kelian 80's oxfords w/heels in beige, they're great but sort of hurt my feet so can't wear walking around the city.
― daria-g, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:12 (seventeen years ago)
a-ha! how do I shot bensimon shoes in the US?
― daria-g, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:19 (seventeen years ago)
i don't know send troops to war in europe?
― rrrobyn, Friday, 11 April 2008 18:39 (seventeen years ago)
Oh my goodness, judging by the revealing spring outfits worn today by the ladies on 30th Ave., it's going to be a very interesting summer fashion-wise in Astoria. So much tackiness in one place, without even having to take a trip to Brighton Beach.
― Virginia Plain, Sunday, 13 April 2008 00:26 (seventeen years ago)
i've been looking for a good pair, but i don't own any boat shoes, which when worn outside of the context of being on a sailboat have an unshakable association for me with the privilege of conspicuously dressing down granted to the boating class. i don't dislike the look, but it requires some thought; add a polo shirt and you'd look like any one of my New England private high school classmates, i.e. like an asshole.
i kinda like the topsider boot here, the height makes the classic shape a little less overtly yuppie.
http://www.dandyrogue.com/IMAGES/LB9.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Sunday, 13 April 2008 22:41 (seventeen years ago)
boat shoes are like the braided belts of men's footwear
― elmo argonaut, Sunday, 13 April 2008 22:47 (seventeen years ago)
More like the ribbon belt of men's footwear. I have a pair of Ralph Lauren boat shoes that have held up really well for like, five years (!) which I actually use for boating. Boat shoes are an okay causal alternative to sneakers but I think those shoes above look ugly and sloppy and kind of perverse.
― Lamp, Sunday, 13 April 2008 23:13 (seventeen years ago)
eh, the only people I've seen who can really pull off the topsider thing are tall, skinny, and of a descent underrepresented in coastal New England. Otherwise you really do look like you're wearing them for reals.
― burt_stanton, Monday, 14 April 2008 00:25 (seventeen years ago)
heh, that's a nice post-colonial gesture of you, burt, but i think your prescription for boat shoes is a tad idiotic
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 14 April 2008 14:23 (seventeen years ago)
maybe "boat shoes" should be added to "stuff white people like"?
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 14 April 2008 14:32 (seventeen years ago)
I haaaaaaaaaaaaaate boat shoes. You might have known that already. Some trends one just cannot get behind.
I'm wondering what the hell to make my everyday footwear once it's too hot for motorcycle boots.
― Laurel, Monday, 14 April 2008 14:35 (seventeen years ago)
Otherwise you really do look like you're wearing them for reals.
If by "for reals" you mean, "like a person who owns a boat and can actually sail it/is about to go sailing", that's a fairly...desirable thing to be mistaken for?
― Laurel, Monday, 14 April 2008 14:36 (seventeen years ago)
for reals == not ironically == the WHITENESS of boat shoes must be SUBVERTED
yeah, i thought it was retarded, too
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 14 April 2008 14:41 (seventeen years ago)
Wasn't that the whole point about wearing them in the first place, you dinguses?
― burt_stanton, Monday, 14 April 2008 14:41 (seventeen years ago)
They don't work for me "ironically", my block against them is strong and cannot be breached.
― Laurel, Monday, 14 April 2008 14:43 (seventeen years ago)
Something about being from a sailing town inhabited by snotty summer people whose children seem incredulous that you have sports teams and, y'know, running water at your high school.
― Laurel, Monday, 14 April 2008 14:44 (seventeen years ago)
"you mean your school doesn't have a lacrosse team?"
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 14 April 2008 14:51 (seventeen years ago)
I think they were surprised we had tennis, if I recall correctly. I told them we not only had tennis, but electricity, too! I was a rawther bitter 16-yr old.
― Laurel, Monday, 14 April 2008 14:54 (seventeen years ago)
I do feel yr pain, Laurel. On a level they remind me of my snotty aunt Mary, who is really into her family tartan and lives lakeside with waterfowl taxidermy and wicker furniture. Boat's outside. There is also a certain kind of perma-tanned prep girl with very thin, bony legs who is able to rock the original dark brown ones with a worn denim mini and a battered old boarding school sweatshirt. I went to college with at least a hundred of her.
You must also have an aversion to Bermudas, Tretorns and grosgrain headbands.
On the other hand I think they'd look great in black with the right jeans rolled to mid-calf and everything else vaguely monochrome.
http://www.sperrytopsider.com has black, but only in patent or suede. Suede!?!?!? having any contact with salty water regularly? Pffffft.
― suzy, Monday, 14 April 2008 14:56 (seventeen years ago)
laurel you seem to hate fashion choices based on childhood memories
― max, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:01 (seventeen years ago)
oh i take that back, i misread your comment about flannel above
also boat shoes are pretty great
― max, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:03 (seventeen years ago)
Oh well, you weren't wrong! But that's still a perfectly good set of reasons.
Ahhhhhhhh, ten years in New York as of this June.
― Laurel, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:04 (seventeen years ago)
i have a pair of these: http://shop.vans.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/product2_10001_15604_10101_345251_-1#
eminently rockable
― max, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:04 (seventeen years ago)
i too am injured to boat shoes from a childhood surround by grateful dead bears playing lacrosse tshirt wearing dbags
― jhøshea, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:06 (seventeen years ago)
i do like thos vans tho max
i gotta get one of those shirts one of these days
― gabbneb, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:07 (seventeen years ago)
and a white pomfret lax hat
― gabbneb, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:08 (seventeen years ago)
Suzy, I'm fond of the prep uniform that's actually from slightly before my time, ie those handbags that button onto wooden handles and wrap skirts appliqued with lighthouses and old Lily Pulitzer and so on. Just not the stuff I grew up around. My generation, I guess.
― Laurel, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:09 (seventeen years ago)
-- gabbneb, Monday, April 14, 2008 11:07 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
lol i have one - i dressed up as one of those dude for halloween one year w/a dirty white college hat and all - strangers at the party were all why didnt you dress up
― jhøshea, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:11 (seventeen years ago)
i rocked a tacky eurotrash boatshoes look around summer 2002. white boat shoes, white flared pants, sherbert or navy striped cotton sweaters. shit was HOT.
― bell_labs, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:12 (seventeen years ago)
guys i'm so so sorry for the grateful dead dancing bears shirts, they're pretty exclusively my dad's fault :( :(
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:12 (seventeen years ago)
i do have one with dancing bears encircling the earth and an enviro-themed lyric, but i think it has numerous holes in it
― gabbneb, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:13 (seventeen years ago)
elmo plz explain
― jhøshea, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:14 (seventeen years ago)
I wd like that on you, bell. You and max and y'know, people I like get a pass. For me, though -- no.
― Laurel, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:14 (seventeen years ago)
pops is founder / art director of l1qu1d blu3, fine purveyor of hippie shit since 1987
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:15 (seventeen years ago)
in the family business eh elmo
― jhøshea, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:19 (seventeen years ago)
yeah for now :\
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:20 (seventeen years ago)
The handle bags are called Bermuda bags and I still have mine, rescuing it last time in the US because I thought 'revive' but I totally jettisoned the white turtlenecks with hearts or whales on and the DUCK SHOES at 14. A lot of people do recoil from the fashion choices of horrible people encountered in adolescence. I would never wear 'powder jackets' or teased bangs de la mall, and as to more upscale choices, fuck a Coach bag for this reason.
Things that still work for me: Fair Isle, oldskool Burberry trench, TopSiders, anything from Orvis, Lacoste shirts, button-downs, penny loafers, argyle socks, cardigans, Bermuda bag. Plus any grandmother/aunt heirloom.
Also please to recognize the trend of gay designers' first menswear collections ALWAYS fetishising the guys who beat the shit out of them in high school. Especially those cute metalhead stoners and meaty skinheads.
― suzy, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:21 (seventeen years ago)
mee too - its not such a bad deal on my end to be honest - i took like 3 months off last year xp
― jhøshea, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:21 (seventeen years ago)
I had to ditch the penny loafers and the deck shoes, the button-downs, the knife-pleated Pendleton skirts, all shirts with camp collars, grograin-ribboned flats, and Coach bags (although I secretly prefer the old raw ones about 235384609384609x over their contemporary logo look). Twin sets survived the gauntlet only because of midcentury secretarial associations. :D
― Laurel, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:28 (seventeen years ago)
http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/ciu/01/49/769a7220eca0d2f8124e4010._AA240_.L.jpg
― daria-g, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:31 (seventeen years ago)
Has that been reissued?
― suzy, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:37 (seventeen years ago)
Nah, should be though! I got my copy in a thrift store in Providence, RI.
I'm wearing penny loafers right now, actually..
― daria-g, Monday, 14 April 2008 15:45 (seventeen years ago)
Do suzy and daria and anyone else get the feeling that our mothers' priorities/proprieties might have something in common?
― Laurel, Monday, 14 April 2008 16:03 (seventeen years ago)
I still also like argyle, plaid, polo shirts, Lacoste.. have an old Coach satchel bag but don't use it a lot. used to wear LL Bean moccasin shoes in middle school (Catholic school.. but also only private school around.. the wealthy kids were v preppy. there was a lacrosse team) but don't dig the plaid skirts any more for that reason. I guess at the time we were all pretty stylish --> oversized white men's buttondown (pref hand me down), mocs or penny loafers, bomber jacket, argyle socks (pref didn't match at all), baggy long cardigan, the uniform required knife pleat plaid skirt w/pleats stitched down cheerleader style & worn as short as possible. this is like 89-91. the high schoolers looked cooler though b/c were allowed to wear polo shirts in any color they wanted so always had completely clashing outfits.
― daria-g, Monday, 14 April 2008 16:16 (seventeen years ago)
I did not go to private school but the place was full of rich suburban kids who wore a lot of Esprit and Ralph Lauren. They were not WASPS; the hardcore preps went to school next town over. Any preppiness passed on to me came direct from paternal grandmother who refused unnatural fibers and did not believe in buying her own jewellery.
My mother OTOH smokes bingo cigs and wears tracksuits or mom jeans and angora sweaters all with QUITE A LOT OF GOLD.
― suzy, Monday, 14 April 2008 16:30 (seventeen years ago)
my public highschool had a lacrosse team. is that some normally private school thing?
― bell_labs, Monday, 14 April 2008 16:31 (seventeen years ago)
anyways despite growing up in new england i missed the whole preppy thing. i mean i grew up in the town next to l.l.bean's and everyone had their backbacks and totebags but it was not really a style icon but more of a utilitarian kind of place.
― bell_labs, Monday, 14 April 2008 16:33 (seventeen years ago)
xpost - Laurel - dunno.. I only got sent to private school because my mother is super Catholic & the church had to help with tuition. Zero prep/WASP in my background, just working class Catholics and Minnewegians. I prob had to assimilate because otherwise you'd get treated pretty badly by the in crowd. :) I think public school was a better environment though in retrospect it took me a couple years into it to get over being thoroughly materialistic, looking down on ppl for fashion choices, & swearing like a sailor all the time.
― daria-g, Monday, 14 April 2008 16:34 (seventeen years ago)
it might have been a generational or class thing but it was more of a dirtbag camping flannel shirts culture than a preppy one. my mom IS called buffy tho.
― bell_labs, Monday, 14 April 2008 16:36 (seventeen years ago)
and i played women's lacrosse
― bell_labs, Monday, 14 April 2008 16:37 (seventeen years ago)
i grew up in princeton, NJ, our best sports teams were lacrosse and soccer and all the (white) jocks were really preppy
― max, Monday, 14 April 2008 16:38 (seventeen years ago)
like excited-rumors-about-a-jcrew-store-opening-up preppy
i mostly wore the kind of tshirts elmo's dad makes
i didnt date much
did elmo's dad make that one with the solar system in deep purple and blue?
― bell_labs, Monday, 14 April 2008 16:39 (seventeen years ago)
I did not go to private school but the place was full of rich suburban kids who wore a lot of Esprit and Ralph Lauren.
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS I was so mad my mother wouldn't buy me Esprit and puffy sweatshirts and she was all, "Why don't I make your oversized 80's Oxford-style shirts, that way no one else will have the same" and that worked great for a while and also kept us from following any small-town trends (if we needed anything nice, we got it in Grand Rapids lol).
I inherited ALL the grandma costume jewelry b/c my mother will only wear "real" even if that means v small. Or non-existant -- she just got her first diamonds from my dad for Christmas (he objects to them on principle).
― Laurel, Monday, 14 April 2008 16:41 (seventeen years ago)
linds: if this one then yes
http://imagehost.vendio.com/preview/tr/trendyhatsandmore/spacetopliquidbluespacetopti.jpg
still in print
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 14 April 2008 16:43 (seventeen years ago)
i rocked the shit out of that in middle school (long-sleeved version)
― bell_labs, Monday, 14 April 2008 16:44 (seventeen years ago)
:D :D :D
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 14 April 2008 16:45 (seventeen years ago)
Also: We had no extra money but my parents were from the East Coast (and in my mother's case, another era entirely) and living in a largely blue-collar Midwestern town so we sort of stood out anyway.
― Laurel, Monday, 14 April 2008 16:46 (seventeen years ago)
oversized white men's buttondown (pref hand me down), mocs or penny loafers, bomber jacket, argyle socks (pref didn't match at all), baggy long cardigan, the uniform required knife pleat plaid skirt w/pleats stitched down cheerleader style & worn as short as possible.
It was the same at my Catholic HS although we'd roll the waist of our skirts to get them as short as poss and wear boxers underneath. Shoe of choice before I discovered Doc Martens was a Bass suede shoe that had laces but I don't think they make them anymore because I can't find online. Also, saddle shoes.
I can't stomach most of the preppy style staples mentioned about because it still reminds me too much of my mom's style and the girls in my hometown.
― ENBB, Monday, 14 April 2008 16:57 (seventeen years ago)
It's no fun and easy to rebel against when your mom's the prep but it's charming if it's someone in your family who was stylin' enough to carry off bare legs with ballet flats at 70. My grandmother maintained that jewellery should never come in fake and labels should really never show. What she would make of my sister the POLO SPORT billboard I have no idea.
My mom could sew but gave it up when she found out me and my sister did not like wearing matching bell-bottom jumpsuits. She transferred her energy to combing the 80 per cent racks at Dayton's with my aunt.
― suzy, Monday, 14 April 2008 17:04 (seventeen years ago)
I had a tie-dye in junior high of a Blues-Brothers style Donald Duck pizacatto the upright bass. And one that had the "after all the things have been killed and ruined, then you will realize you can't eat money." ...
― Abbott, Monday, 14 April 2008 18:09 (seventeen years ago)
<i>we'd roll the waist of our skirts to get them as short as poss and wear boxers underneath</i>
yes exactly! every now and then the nuns would crack down and make everyone unroll the waistband so they were somewhat close to knee length, which would last about 1 day. there was a couple years where boxer shorts were.. normal shorts? they sold them in the juniors department in flower prints and stuff. I also wore Umbros soccer shorts a lot, the other big trend at the time. forgot about those. I also had Bass shoes they were sort of moccasin style but laces, yes. and a big LL Bean backpack (pref leather bottom) with stuff written all over it.
― daria-g, Monday, 14 April 2008 19:08 (seventeen years ago)
no offense daria but gaaaah girls in umbro flashback
― jhøshea, Monday, 14 April 2008 19:12 (seventeen years ago)
they were nice for playing sports in hot weather though. the ones I had were short, very lightweight, solid color (black or green).
― daria-g, Monday, 14 April 2008 19:21 (seventeen years ago)
yah theyre fine to play soccer in but those shits were epidemic roaming hs halls
― jhøshea, Monday, 14 April 2008 19:23 (seventeen years ago)
NIKEiD, want:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2045/2414437304_b5a9cdcc0c_o.jpg
― czn, Monday, 14 April 2008 19:25 (seventeen years ago)
big LL Bean backpack (pref leather bottom) with stuff written all over it
Ha - yes!! I saw girl on the train with this last week and it brought be back. There was also a period of time where nearly everyone in my school had to have a J Crew barn jacket. That may have been a long island thing though.
― ENBB, Monday, 14 April 2008 19:27 (seventeen years ago)
jhoshea i briefly read that as "epidemic roaming of balls" -- still applies to soccer shorts tho, ha
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 14 April 2008 19:32 (seventeen years ago)
i definitely blame the umbro epidemic for the first ever viewing of a nutsuck (dudes you gotta keep those legs crossed!)
― bell_labs, Monday, 14 April 2008 19:33 (seventeen years ago)
ok first person here to be pictured on a street fashion blog rocking an ll bean backpack gets $5
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 14 April 2008 19:34 (seventeen years ago)
http://dontbechi.blogspot.com/2007/12/im-just-going-to-have-to-blatantly-rip.html
^ fake?
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 14 April 2008 19:43 (seventeen years ago)
dude that fake is about 10 years old!
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 14 April 2008 19:44 (seventeen years ago)
is it :(
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Monday, 14 April 2008 19:59 (seventeen years ago)
definitely remember the faked ad from years ago; also note the heaven's gate folks' shoes had no purple in 'em
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 14 April 2008 20:02 (seventeen years ago)
I remember seeing that ad using my 56k modem on Windows 95 lol90s
― burt_stanton, Monday, 14 April 2008 20:08 (seventeen years ago)
For all fellows out there, I got all excited because I stumbled upon the watch site trustytime.com without realizing they are "replicas" (I am smrt) but now I'm dejected because I want to get a beautiful and semi-reliable watch for my boyfriend's 30th birthday but it needs to be about $150 or lower. Any ideas? He and I are not name junkies, we just like cool, clean things that work well.
I figure between all you fashionable folk I may be able to find a website that I can trust more than random Googling.
― Finefinemusic, Monday, 14 April 2008 20:18 (seventeen years ago)
This is what I was excited to buy: http://www.trustytime88.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=35_81&products_id=178&zenid=731466f8562156046f59336fce998723 If I could find this style for a comparable price that isn't passing itself off as the Omega that it isn't, I'd love it.
― Finefinemusic, Monday, 14 April 2008 20:22 (seventeen years ago)
i don't know much about watches; i don't wear one
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 14 April 2008 20:23 (seventeen years ago)
finefinemusic, haven't been there in a couple of years but watchismo.com used to have a section of cool vintage watches on sale (usually under $200).
― chicago kevin, Monday, 14 April 2008 20:25 (seventeen years ago)
huh, REALLY expensive now.
― chicago kevin, Monday, 14 April 2008 20:26 (seventeen years ago)
the day my old Eddie Bauer backpack becomes fashionable, I'll eat my green plaid poplin shirt $49
― burt_stanton, Monday, 14 April 2008 20:43 (seventeen years ago)
those are awesome chicago kevin, but definitely mostly out of my price range. +1 for the awesome URL too, thank you!
― Finefinemusic, Monday, 14 April 2008 20:49 (seventeen years ago)
er xpost
― Finefinemusic, Monday, 14 April 2008 20:50 (seventeen years ago)
hey good lookin'
http://i.l.cnn.net/cnn/2008/CRIME/04/14/polygamist.retreat/art.yfz.ranch.ap.jpg
― sanskrit, Monday, 14 April 2008 20:57 (seventeen years ago)
^T/S: Holly Hobbie v Strawberry Shortcake v 'Pa! Pa! I'm going blind, Pa!'
― suzy, Monday, 14 April 2008 21:02 (seventeen years ago)
lilac really is a good color on her, weird
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 14 April 2008 21:34 (seventeen years ago)
i actually did go buy a bright blue LL Bean backpack last year. they don't make the leather bottom ones any more I think? unfortunately I'm pretty sure my old one from the 90's is long gone
― daria-g, Monday, 14 April 2008 21:50 (seventeen years ago)
My mom and sister bought me "designer" clothes before I realized I even wanted them: Guess jeans (with the zippers), Esprit everything, Tretorns. All of the shirts I wore were terribly oversized, looking back. One birthday party I went to we all got Ralph Lauren socks (with the polo icon) as the party favors.
― Virginia Plain, Tuesday, 15 April 2008 03:26 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.realtree.com/store/products/lg_WH100HWGFRONT.jpg
XD
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 16 April 2008 13:34 (seventeen years ago)
i want this guy's hair, glasses, & jewlery. i covet.
http://men.style.com/slideshows/mens/standalone/gq/fashion/0408/rebels/00001f.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 17 April 2008 16:29 (seventeen years ago)
dude, start a tumblr-- Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, April 8, 2008 9:15 PM
-- Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, April 8, 2008 9:15 PM
i'm doin this
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 17 April 2008 18:13 (seventeen years ago)
that gq article was pretty good - i like it more when they profile certain people about their own inspiration, rather than just list expensive shit they think you should buy. not a fan of the plunging v-neck though.
― __CB__, Thursday, 17 April 2008 22:01 (seventeen years ago)
oh hey guys. this is mine.
http://argonaut.tumblr.com/
not much for now, image pilfering and indiscriminate linking are ongoing, not so much with the original content
hooray
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 24 April 2008 16:32 (seventeen years ago)
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51X1in5Q%2BKL._SL500_AA280_.jpg I ended up buying this beautiful watch (the price was awesome!) for his 30th birthday, and it came yesterday… oh goodness, it's so beautiful and classic looking and I hope he likes it! I figured since it was his 30th birthday it was time for a "grown up" gift, if he still wants Xbox 360 he can take his grown up wages and buy it himself ;) I am going to wait 'til he's opened it and I know for sure that he likes it, but I'll probably get it engraved with something on the back.
― Finefinemusic, Thursday, 24 April 2008 19:58 (seventeen years ago)
classy!
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 24 April 2008 20:03 (seventeen years ago)
In came with three different boxes, each inside a bigger one, like one of those Russian babushka dolls. What's classier than extraneous packaging? Nothing!
I can't wait for May 12 now, I want to see his face! Last year he got Steve Maddens, similar to these:
http://cdn.overstock.com/images/products/P10936506.jpg
― Finefinemusic, Thursday, 24 April 2008 20:06 (seventeen years ago)
http://streetpeeper.com/?p=4190 lol waht
― sleep, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 16:51 (seventeen years ago)
i hate being all "eat a cheeseburger" but that woman is skinny in an extremely unattractive way
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 16:58 (seventeen years ago)
maybe it is just the old man socks/loafers thing but her legs look terrible
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:00 (seventeen years ago)
i was gonna say, is that a woman, even? looks like hairy manlegs.
― sleep, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:05 (seventeen years ago)
Oh Phil.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:08 (seventeen years ago)
and yet her (its?) arms are completely smooth and hairless!
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:09 (seventeen years ago)
That's because it's a reptile.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:10 (seventeen years ago)
doesn't anorexia make you grow a fine layer of fur all over your body or something?
― bell_labs, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:18 (seventeen years ago)
LANUGO
― Laurel, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:20 (seventeen years ago)
-- __CB__, Thursday, April 17, 2008 5:01 PM (1 week ago) Bookmark Link
i liked the article a couple issues back where they interviewed this LA barber, i forget what his name was but the piece was A+
― deej, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:22 (seventeen years ago)
hay someone recommend me some glasses framez that dont look too fashionista-y but have kind of an old school professorial vibe maybe? im just shooting in the dark here i dont really know what im looking for or if i just want to go back to contacts
― deej, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:25 (seventeen years ago)
im thinking nabisco or elmo might have some suggestions?? or anyone really
http://www.begoodatit.com/images/basil/presidents_lg.jpg imo
― sleep, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:35 (seventeen years ago)
where do i buy
― deej, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:36 (seventeen years ago)
arent those wayfarers w/ glasses lenses
― max, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:38 (seventeen years ago)
frame is a little too round
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:41 (seventeen years ago)
ur a little too round!!
― sleep, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:42 (seventeen years ago)
anyway yea max is rite, dunno where to buy, google that shit
― sleep, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:43 (seventeen years ago)
a google for "glasses frames" should immediately pull up exactly what you want
― Abbott, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:44 (seventeen years ago)
― sleep, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:45 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.google.com/search?q=prescription+wayfarers
― sleep, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:46 (seventeen years ago)
get some brow line frames, those are always cool
― max, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:48 (seventeen years ago)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/49/Malcolm-x.jpg
rayban 8613 silver / black temples
― remy bean, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 17:49 (seventeen years ago)
mine are shuron ronsir revelations in tortoise w/ silver-tone accents
getting a coupla new pairs from them soon i think
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 18:03 (seventeen years ago)
shuron.com
the wayfarer shape is pretty classic but has become ubiquitous, but i've been seeing persol 649s a lot more recently so i guess they're the emergent trend
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 18:35 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.puntovisione.com/images/649.jpg
― jhøshea, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 18:39 (seventeen years ago)
wayfarer silhouette til i die
― max, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 18:39 (seventeen years ago)
i can wear colored wayfarers during summer but black framed ones are kinda lol risky business
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 18:43 (seventeen years ago)
-- Abbott, Tuesday, April 29, 2008 12:44 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link
a google for 'jokes' might find u funny things to say :D
― deej, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 18:49 (seventeen years ago)
weaksauce
― jergïns, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 18:53 (seventeen years ago)
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/11_01/michaelcaine_468x554.jpg
nobody but nobody wore glasses like michael caine
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 18:58 (seventeen years ago)
hot
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 19:50 (seventeen years ago)
i need more awesome glasses
― rrrobyn, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 19:51 (seventeen years ago)
the problem with having multiple pairs of glasses is that it becomes another thing to match with your outfit
in my dreams i have more eyeglasses than alton brown
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 19:55 (seventeen years ago)
dude has like a million different frames
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)
um, im pretty sure its a guy...
btw, can y'all click on those puma ads for me pleeeeease? just once though.
― phil-two, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 21:46 (seventeen years ago)
i got these blinde frames (in black) recently and i think they are v good but who can say? as soon as you try a frame on it's either very right or very wrong depending on what your face is like.
http://www.contactsandspecs.com/blinde000950222658.html
― jed_, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 22:50 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.blinde.com/collections/blinde/frames/500/oph/ANODDFELLO.JPG
i think the old style 3 pin jointing adds a lot. also, you can't really tell but the edges are very crisply angular rather than curved which is nice.
― jed_, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 22:53 (seventeen years ago)
http://zivity.com/
^ waht
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Tuesday, 29 April 2008 23:03 (seventeen years ago)
I feel like wayfarer is starting to get played out, because of people overwearing the dayglo plastic ones. Still probably the only aesthetically pleasing sunglass style though.
― freewheel, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 05:19 (seventeen years ago)
i will forever be grateful for the wayfarer comeback just because they killed off the retarded oversized shades look (not completely or forever, but still)
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 12:47 (seventeen years ago)
wayfarer's only sin is looking good on a wide variety of face types
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 12:52 (seventeen years ago)
orly
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:10 (seventeen years ago)
i guess nothing could help that dude
doms not a that bad a dresser deej
― max, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:32 (seventeen years ago)
those are suited to his face just fine, better than a lot of popular styles would really
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:41 (seventeen years ago)
the rest of his outfit is a mess but whatever
forest vs. trees, do u see?
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:44 (seventeen years ago)
sorry too distracted by poor fitting jeans and ugly sneakers
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:46 (seventeen years ago)
poor fitting jeans? they're ok
― sleep, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:47 (seventeen years ago)
one of my favorite things about ilx fashion threads is everyone's "amirite folks" condescension despite the fact that everyone's really coming at this from totally different angles
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:49 (seventeen years ago)
we can all agree on being jerks :)
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:50 (seventeen years ago)
those dunks are ugz though xp
― sleep, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:50 (seventeen years ago)
(: we can all agree on being jerks :)
i think he looks alright... is it an ilxor or just some random dude?
― phil-two, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:51 (seventeen years ago)
(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(: we can all agree on being jerks :):):):):):):):)
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:51 (seventeen years ago)
-- phil-two, Wednesday, April 30, 2008 10:51 AM (59 seconds ago) Bookmark Link
one of the first GIS results for wayfarers why its dom passantino
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:53 (seventeen years ago)
pic is from a random streetstyle blog, i think
the shooz completely ruin it
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:53 (seventeen years ago)
i hate dunks - there ive said it
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:55 (seventeen years ago)
you can wear colorful nikes or whatever but the rest of you better look like you're fun cuz the top half is all 'i am serious business'
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:57 (seventeen years ago)
why its dom passantino
SHUT UP!!! I was just thinking, oh he's kinda cute in that dorky pudgy way i like... OMG I feel ill now.
― phil-two, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:58 (seventeen years ago)
http://i28.tinypic.com/300u1ag.jpg
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:03 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.styleclicker.net/uploaded_images/080329-True-Blue-Munich-Reichenbachstrasse-761458.JPG
^^^ <3 <3 <3 dreamy
i expect the boots might not go over so well here but i dig
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:05 (seventeen years ago)
maybe pants on outside of boots and no target ass lookin scarf
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:06 (seventeen years ago)
im getting the feeling his top shirt button is done up
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:07 (seventeen years ago)
nice suit, keep scarf, pants over boots, lose briefcase
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:08 (seventeen years ago)
http://streetpeeper.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/img_1007.JPG
i thought this guy i took a photo of in chicago was SOOO cute
― phil-two, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:09 (seventeen years ago)
there's a pink version too! http://www.styleclicker.net/uploaded_images/080405-Young-Gun-Munich-Oberanger-733329.JPG
― Gaia1981, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:09 (seventeen years ago)
actually the case might be ok if he covers up the boots
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:11 (seventeen years ago)
Honestly, I don't think I have to specify what I think of tassel loafers, but that guy in the striped shirt and shorts looks like SO MUCH LESS of a moronic douchebag than Mr I Have Two Velvet Suits. Unholy trinity.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:11 (seventeen years ago)
lol munich
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:11 (seventeen years ago)
the fuchsia suit is certainly awful but no way you're gonna convince me that the a downsy looking man-child in a rugby shirt and loafers looks better
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:14 (seventeen years ago)
i like the downsy looking man-child's outfit better than suit 2 but not as much as suit 1
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:15 (seventeen years ago)
ouch
― phil-two, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:16 (seventeen years ago)
his only real problem is the haircut
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:17 (seventeen years ago)
he looks all disheveled - it yr gonna wear a suit make it tight bro
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:18 (seventeen years ago)
Don't be retarded, I don't actually like his outfit. He just looks like he doesn't care very much, which rescues a whole hell of a lot and means that it's not really worth judging on fashion points alone.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:19 (seventeen years ago)
i'm not into phil's guy's loafers but those shorts are the way forward
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:19 (seventeen years ago)
maybe i would have nicer things to say if it wasn't for the mirrored shades / lanyard / bar bracelet / cup o beer i.e. douche accessories
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:20 (seventeen years ago)
both of them look like dorks. i do dig the target scarf
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:20 (seventeen years ago)
I dig the fuchsia suit! esp the button. why not? please move to DC and wear that. I think he should get more expensive boots though.
― daria-g, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:20 (seventeen years ago)
xp tracer the shorts are ok but his legs really aren't up to them, sadly
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:21 (seventeen years ago)
I was actually assuming he was at some sort of music conference or something, hence the lanyard and bracelet and summer stylez.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:22 (seventeen years ago)
oh yeah, he's got kinda skinny thighs, or weird knees. i like all this douche accessories, of course; i assume block party.
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:24 (seventeen years ago)
phil's guy has a great outfit on, I think.. his face is v young looking which is a little weird
― daria-g, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:25 (seventeen years ago)
who wears short shorts.
preppy thing taken too far. im not saying his look aint together its just not a look i dig
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:26 (seventeen years ago)
hey lets talk abt how we hate shorts again!
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:27 (seventeen years ago)
i like shorts! i just dont like those
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:28 (seventeen years ago)
a friend of mine was an assistant to a rather well known artist - the previous holder of his job had been fired mostly because he wore shorts
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:28 (seventeen years ago)
i hate shorts and only wear them for shorts based activities like sports or going to the beach or hanging around the house
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:29 (seventeen years ago)
i think black people are more or perhaps less likely to fire a worker from their hotel for wearing shorts. Does ILX have an opinion about this?
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:29 (seventeen years ago)
poll
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:30 (seventeen years ago)
let's have a thread about the best restaurants to go to wearing shorts
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:30 (seventeen years ago)
no shorts no service
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:31 (seventeen years ago)
cant take no shorts or no losses
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:32 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.ohhla.com/anonymous/bonethug/e1999/nolosses.bne.txt
oh i love shorts. anyways i wasn't really saying his outfit was so great, i just thought he looked adorable. and laurel, yeah it was the pitchfork festival in chicago last year
btw tracer, im in london til friday. going to the maharishi store by covent garden in a bit for my friend's apparel line launch party.. want to come?
― phil-two, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:34 (seventeen years ago)
i love blue/pink suit guy!!
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:35 (seventeen years ago)
email me your number phil (click on my name)
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:35 (seventeen years ago)
the velveteen suit dude looks more fun to hang with than lanyard beer dude
― max, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:24 (seventeen years ago)
Velvet Suit actually reminds me of someone and I must disagree.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:29 (seventeen years ago)
laurel u gonna need to stop making fashion decisions based on bad memories
― max, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:30 (seventeen years ago)
you can't dress a form upon a memory don't try
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:31 (seventeen years ago)
No way, dude. Memories are as valid as anything. You can't take the emotional fulfillment (or its opposite) out of dressing, it's like the major component.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:32 (seventeen years ago)
Witness all those crazy lookin people on HelLooks who're good for quotes like, "My inspirations are my grandmother, snow, and hamsters."
― Laurel, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:33 (seventeen years ago)
hahaha memories = super valid i prob like the blue suit pic so much b/c i like that colour of blue and the briefcase bag and also his big smile for reasons unrelated to 'pure fashion' wahtever that is (does not exist)
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:37 (seventeen years ago)
yeah hes a smilin dude, also hes foreign or something, how can you dislike that
― max, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:37 (seventeen years ago)
i make all my fashion decisions based on FUTURE memories
― max, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:38 (seventeen years ago)
memories are valid but attitude is absolutely necessary
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:38 (seventeen years ago)
i love those suits. apc did an amazing dark emerald green velvet one about 4yrs ago that was very similar.
― lauren, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:44 (seventeen years ago)
also, wearer of said suits looks a lot like one of my friends so unlike laurel i have the positive memories.
― lauren, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:45 (seventeen years ago)
only wear them for shorts based activities like sports or going to the beach or hanging around the house
also, YES.
― lauren, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:47 (seventeen years ago)
-- max, Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:38 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
you are a young man, this is as it should be
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:00 (seventeen years ago)
-- lauren, Wednesday, April 30, 2008 12:47 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
wtf else would you wear them for? work? dinner parties?
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:01 (seventeen years ago)
i would wear shorts to work
a lot of people wear shorts for everyday activities that have nothing to do with sports, the beach, or sitting around the house.
― lauren, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:03 (seventeen years ago)
i am totally blanking on everyday activities for shorts
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:04 (seventeen years ago)
all i can think is 'walking around' and 'food shopping'
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:05 (seventeen years ago)
Ding and ding.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:06 (seventeen years ago)
i predict some kind of ridiculous american apparel underwear sized shorts will be in style this summer
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:06 (seventeen years ago)
i can only pray you're right.
― chicago kevin, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:07 (seventeen years ago)
i think it's b/c i don't really have anything major against shorts but in fact do only wear them if on a bike or jogging or camping/outdoorsying. i used to wear them a lot as a teenager/early-20s though. but i also only wore doc marten and tevas for a while there. so.
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:07 (seventeen years ago)
unless 100% of skinny fashion boys plan to grow actual buttocks i sure as hell hope not
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:10 (seventeen years ago)
i do not need to see dov charney ass by proxy
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:11 (seventeen years ago)
style predictions for summer 08: tshirts with built-in suspenders "pantsies" - across between a panty and pants two different color socks, with no toes just stirrup feet
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:13 (seventeen years ago)
across = a cross
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:14 (seventeen years ago)
-- rrrobyn, Wednesday, April 30, 2008 1:05 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
-- Laurel, Wednesday, April 30, 2008 1:06 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
wait, so shorts are bad for grocery shopping? got it
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:14 (seventeen years ago)
what if its like a million degrees out and you have to walk six blocks w/ grocery bags?
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:15 (seventeen years ago)
kind of horrified by all those xpost
shorts are not bad!
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:15 (seventeen years ago)
i think i only half-care about fashion, guys hm
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:16 (seventeen years ago)
two different color socks, with no toes just stirrup feet
as long as those individual toe socks arent in im cool with it, something about those on chicks really creeps me out
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:16 (seventeen years ago)
socks that START at your knee and end at your lower thigh
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:17 (seventeen years ago)
btw the tights for pants craze is in full swing as predicted by the ladies of ilx
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:18 (seventeen years ago)
lol thigh-only socks thocks
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:20 (seventeen years ago)
thocks!
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:21 (seventeen years ago)
jesus christ i can't actually believe i'm saying this but...
http://getkempt.com/photos/articles/MOTH_duritz.jpg
counting crows dude is dressed extremely well.
... I feel like I'm in Bizarro world.
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 18:59 (seventeen years ago)
thats a nice suit and no offense elmo but ill be happy when this bowtie shit goes away - most emasculating garment ever!
lol he still has that hair
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:01 (seventeen years ago)
nice suit - a little tight in the chest - but he shouldn't be wearing a bowtie with that shirt
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:02 (seventeen years ago)
suit probably won't have a long life
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:03 (seventeen years ago)
ive been contemplating a new summer suit purchase along those line - alls ive got now is a worn out 3 button blue/white seersucker jobby
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:04 (seventeen years ago)
shoulders slightly too wide?
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:04 (seventeen years ago)
the great thing abt summer suits gabs is they dont have to have a long life - why? cause so cheep!
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:05 (seventeen years ago)
No, that suit not nice at all - suit looks from Gap/Banana Republic regardless of origin, shirt is wrong/cheap looking and you wonder whether he has back hair/'angel wings' due to its translucence. Tie wrong too.
― suzy, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:08 (seventeen years ago)
the suit i am wearing today is from the banana republic >:[
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:10 (seventeen years ago)
it does look a bit like a BR suit. I mean, I would assume not, but if you look at the pockets, it might be. their suits, while cheaply made, are pretty nice-looking on the hanger (ie assuming they fit you well) though not necessarily appropriate for more than biz casual.
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:11 (seventeen years ago)
fuck u, yuppies
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:12 (seventeen years ago)
the suit is paul smith, haters
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:13 (seventeen years ago)
i work in nfp i can't afford real suits ;_;
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:14 (seventeen years ago)
hopefully the cfo and director didnt judge me too harshly in my important meeting
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:15 (seventeen years ago)
i think they're nice-looking suits if you don't need something more expensive (but i think Brooks Brothers suits from the summer sale in early June are comparable in price and presumably come with tailoring)
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:16 (seventeen years ago)
jhoshea, i think this dude might disagree with you about bowties
http://media.tumblr.com/lnMbcqDgA864ww0g0xWgbu1p_500.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:17 (seventeen years ago)
he looks like an overgrown child
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:17 (seventeen years ago)
his hat should have a propeller
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:18 (seventeen years ago)
Re Counting Crows pic: I don't believe suzy is much of a yuppie by any definition. And anyone who's going to be photo'ed by paparazzi ought to have asked the guy at the store what kind of tie would go with that shirt.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:18 (seventeen years ago)
also lol like any of you fuckers would actually ever attempt a bowtie, wherefore the castrated lament
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:18 (seventeen years ago)
I think elmo's guy is pretty cuet but then I have Newsies on VHS.
i know, laurel, he is like a sexy stable boy at the family estate who practices fisticuffs in the hay loft == all good
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:21 (seventeen years ago)
what mens shirts do you guys like? i dig some of penguin's woven shirts but they are $$$
― deej, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:21 (seventeen years ago)
he looks like a powerfully built but mildly retarded man-child who was dressed by his mother.
― chicago kevin, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:21 (seventeen years ago)
and now Adam Duritz will lead the National Symphony in John Philip Sousa's Congress Hall march
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:23 (seventeen years ago)
he looks totally fucking hot.
― jed_, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:24 (seventeen years ago)
yes, kevin, except his mother is living in 1930 which makes it awesome
if you want contemporary parent-dressed retarded man child go to the mall and take in the cargos ballcaps and sneakers
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:26 (seventeen years ago)
duritz looks good
― max, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:27 (seventeen years ago)
also re: duritz shirt/tie combo, wtf would be the point of having a contrasting button placket if you were to wear a long necktie? pshh
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:28 (seventeen years ago)
i can't remember the last time i went to a mall.
― chicago kevin, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:29 (seventeen years ago)
wtf would be the point of having a contrasting button placket if you were to wear a long necktie?
uh
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:29 (seventeen years ago)
what is a 'mall'?
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:30 (seventeen years ago)
a mall is all of manhattan below 14th st and above canal
― bell_labs, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:31 (seventeen years ago)
there is no contrasting placket.
― jed_, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:31 (seventeen years ago)
I don't think that's contrasting, Elmo, I saw it as just a thicker, more opaque white b/c it's multiple layers.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:31 (seventeen years ago)
"seafoam green seersucker suit, pale mint green shirt, greenish blue bowtie with a subtle floral motif, a blue belt and light-blue tinted white wingtips"
the shirt isn't white. not willing to bet on it because my work monitor is fucked for color accuracy but pretty sure the placket is white.
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:35 (seventeen years ago)
also, gabnebb, the suit is not tight in the chest, he is leaning and you can see the lapel bend away from his chest
basically i am calling bullshit on everyone
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:36 (seventeen years ago)
lol elmo thats uncanny i hate little pageboy caps for pretty much the same reason
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:37 (seventeen years ago)
and god help anyone who wears a tie w/a short sleeve shirt
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:38 (seventeen years ago)
ha! fwiw i do not advocate newsie caps in general but dude made it happen i think
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:39 (seventeen years ago)
he is a nice looking fellow tho!
― jhøshea, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:40 (seventeen years ago)
bow ties are for elderly men of new england
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:53 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.boston.com/ae/movies/blog/schlesinger.jpg
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:55 (seventeen years ago)
elderly=50 years and older
xpost=lol camelot it was different then
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:55 (seventeen years ago)
i wasn't contra-ing your post; i think he was always old
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:57 (seventeen years ago)
(and always young)
no i figured you weren't i was just loling camelot. also maybe men looked better in bow ties back then? anyway.
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 19:58 (seventeen years ago)
you can see why i'd be confused
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 20:01 (seventeen years ago)
i just bought these yesterday.
http://www.topman.com/wcsstore/TopMan//images/catalog/79A15SBLK_large.jpg
bernhard willhelm x linda farrow for topman... they look a bit cartoonish and are bigger than it looks in the photo.. but i love them!
― phil-two, Friday, 2 May 2008 07:27 (seventeen years ago)
OK time to 'freshen' my shades; have a great pair of Alain Mikli but OMGZ. Those will look amazing on Oh Phil.
I'm sure bell_labs looks much better in her BR than that idiot wookie ever would in his Paul Smith (and anyhoo my main complaint centred on bad shirt/tie combo whatevs). Re. celebrities in badly chosen designer clothes, am reminded of what Tom Ford reportedly said when he discovered Victoria Beckham was wearing all this Gucci: 'AAAAGH! How do we get it OFF her?"
― suzy, Friday, 2 May 2008 09:02 (seventeen years ago)
http://media.tumblr.com/lnMbcqDgA8vwfx84NSHm386F_500.jpg
^^^ hero
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 12 May 2008 16:50 (seventeen years ago)
approved ^^^ but... layered socks or just 1 pair of awesome socks?
― sleep, Monday, 12 May 2008 16:57 (seventeen years ago)
the layering is a bit much, i doubt i would try it, but hey these blog people are weird that way i guess
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 12 May 2008 17:01 (seventeen years ago)
but yeah, i kinda wish those were 1 pair of socks because i would buy them v v fast
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 12 May 2008 17:06 (seventeen years ago)
If they're layed that would appeal to my 8-10 year old self who though layering her scruch socks was the business.
― ENBB, Monday, 12 May 2008 17:09 (seventeen years ago)
um . . . layered
way xpost:just spotted this:
-- elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 16:53 (7 months ago)
elmo, I heart you.
― Drew Daniel, Monday, 12 May 2008 17:42 (seventeen years ago)
i think everyone's knitting friends should make two-tone socks for them :D
― rrrobyn, Monday, 12 May 2008 17:45 (seventeen years ago)
or maybe i should start knitting again and make them myself :/
― rrrobyn, Monday, 12 May 2008 17:46 (seventeen years ago)
Elmo's hero looks like ILXor Mark P!
― nabisco, Monday, 12 May 2008 17:48 (seventeen years ago)
awww shucks, Drew, right back atcha. <3
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 12 May 2008 17:57 (seventeen years ago)
elmo's hero looks like Sherburne!
― jergïns, Monday, 12 May 2008 18:02 (seventeen years ago)
Elmo's hero can buy two-tone socks in Paul Smith or Tabio, or at least layer in Tabio.
― suzy, Monday, 12 May 2008 18:26 (seventeen years ago)
ok i am looking online for socks now
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 12 May 2008 18:44 (seventeen years ago)
because: is there any reason for men to wear white socks?
no, there is not.
(not that i wear white socks anyway)
― elmo argonaut, Monday, 12 May 2008 18:45 (seventeen years ago)
http://metalburger.com/collection/img/item_001.jpg
im in tokyo, just bought a shitload of comme and yohji, but also bought this thing... im not sure if i made a solid decision on it though... i think iy may make me look a bit.... g-a-y.
― phil-two, Tuesday, 20 May 2008 06:06 (seventeen years ago)
fuck im really regretting the jacket now... it wasnt cheap either.
― phil-two, Tuesday, 20 May 2008 06:54 (seventeen years ago)
um, just a bit g-a-y. i like it, though! probably looks great on you.
bring me back some novelty snack foods!
― lauren, Tuesday, 20 May 2008 13:30 (seventeen years ago)
Don't worry, Phil, it's being gay that is actually making you look a bit gay. Not the jacket's fault.
― Laurel, Tuesday, 20 May 2008 13:44 (seventeen years ago)
the best part about it is the label is called "Diet Butcher Slim Skin"
― phil-two, Tuesday, 20 May 2008 15:11 (seventeen years ago)
well, there you go.
― lauren, Tuesday, 20 May 2008 15:15 (seventeen years ago)
Why don't you just wear a Pierrot costume out to the clubs, Phil?
― antexit, Tuesday, 20 May 2008 17:19 (seventeen years ago)
I like the jacket! Did you get the America sneaks, Phil? I had a dream I bought a pair last night.
― Abbott, Tuesday, 20 May 2008 17:21 (seventeen years ago)
Re. celebrities in badly chosen designer clothes, am reminded of what Tom Ford reportedly said when he discovered Victoria Beckham was wearing all this Gucci: 'AAAAGH! How do we get it OFF her?"
Tom Ford apparently forgot those were the only clothes she had on the Spice Bus! "Should I wear the little Gucci dress, the little Gucci dress, or the little Gucci dress?" A debate for the ages.
― Abbott, Tuesday, 20 May 2008 17:22 (seventeen years ago)
phil, i love the jacket. if anyone can carry it off, you can.
― jed_, Tuesday, 20 May 2008 17:30 (seventeen years ago)
i'm glad that people have moved away from hoodies and everything but dudes what is with your cardigans these days and why do none of them ever fit you?
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 23 May 2008 17:31 (seventeen years ago)
Phil, if you don't keep that thing I WANT. Also Lauren would like a turquoise Comme wallet.
― suzy, Friday, 23 May 2008 17:54 (seventeen years ago)
i have not moved away from hoodies
― rrrobyn, Friday, 23 May 2008 18:01 (seventeen years ago)
but i also think my return to band shirts is fashion fwd also i really shouldn't wear these pants to work anymore i said this months ago when they started falling apart, and i say it now that i notice that bike riding has caused structural damage to inner thigh area
my co-worker just made this grand arm gesture at me and said 'i like casual friday robyn; it's the real robyn' lol i need more dresses guys
― rrrobyn, Friday, 23 May 2008 19:34 (seventeen years ago)
haha, i hate you. btw, you still coming to ny next week? you should put on this miu miu dress and we can go clubbin'
http://style.blogs.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/10/08/miumiu.jpg
i guess also rrrobyn, here's a dress if you want. its really $$$$ though
― phil-two, Friday, 23 May 2008 23:56 (seventeen years ago)
I like the jacket! Did you get the America sneaks, Phil? i hesitated and they sold out my size. maybe for the best, really
― phil-two, Friday, 23 May 2008 23:57 (seventeen years ago)
elmo, where do you live? do you want to contribute photos to streetpeeper please?
― phil-two, Friday, 6 June 2008 21:42 (seventeen years ago)
hey guys where can i find slim-fit shorts
― max, Friday, 6 June 2008 21:44 (seventeen years ago)
that dont cost me $120
phil, i live in providence, ri -- may not be the best time of year for photos as all the risd & brown kids just moved out for the summer, but i wouldn't flat-out reject the opportunity
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 6 June 2008 21:46 (seventeen years ago)
max, i'm wearing some banana republic cotton slacks that i cut off, i think a similar strategy might be best for u 2
― elmo argonaut, Friday, 6 June 2008 21:48 (seventeen years ago)
yeah i have no idea where to get slim cut shorts for not crazy $$$. i saw some from band of outsiders for like $200... oof.
elmo, oh, ok well when the kiddies come back if you want to take pics whenever, that would be cool. i trust you wont be creepy when taking pics of the girls like my last friend who used this as a way to pick up girls
― phil-two, Friday, 6 June 2008 21:56 (seventeen years ago)
don't think you have to worry about that w/elmo.
― jaymc, Friday, 6 June 2008 22:15 (seventeen years ago)
hahaha
― Surmounter, Friday, 6 June 2008 22:16 (seventeen years ago)
well if i had a camera i'd definitely use it to talk to mennnn
― Surmounter, Friday, 6 June 2008 22:17 (seventeen years ago)
he posted that before Excel even finished loading
― nabisco, Friday, 6 June 2008 22:18 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.hel-looks.com/photos/20080608_01.jpg
Jermu (3) "I'm wearing an eagle t-shirt and flower socks. My cap is yellow and there is some net at the back. I like red, cars and legos."
― elmo argonaut, Sunday, 8 June 2008 21:28 (seventeen years ago)
My sister got cute slim shorts from H&M.
― Virginia Plain, Sunday, 8 June 2008 21:40 (seventeen years ago)
Um oh zowee
http://hel-looks.com/?p=image/archives/2/20080605_01/
― nabisco, Monday, 30 June 2008 19:07 (seventeen years ago)
Please confirm / deny that I'm not crazy and this guy actually has a devil-horn tattoo thing going on
― nabisco, Monday, 30 June 2008 19:08 (seventeen years ago)
maybe interesting article by virginia heffernan om "street-style photoblogs" including garance doré, which i don't really love.
― ice cræm and cæk (Lamp), Sunday, 21 December 2008 18:33 (seventeen years ago)
two things
1.
^^^still lovin this guy
2. I have a nice black Stetson Homburg, but it makes me look like I can't decide whether I'm Amish or an Orthodox Jew (I have actually had two different people decide I must be Israeli because of it)
― nabisco, Tuesday, September 25, 2007 11:38 AM (1 year ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
you should probably wear this 24 hours a day 7 days a week
― rox qua rox (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 24 December 2008 17:46 (seventeen years ago)
Hey guys remember the whole long argument we had upthread about the girl from the twee fashion blog, with the barrette and the cardigan and whatnot? I was looking at Facebook the other day and there she was, staring out from a friend's list of friends. Turns out that photo was a promo for her band, the Budgies. They're Swedish and pretty obviously twee.
― nabisco, Wednesday, 16 September 2009 17:35 (sixteen years ago)
http://thesartorialist.blogspot.com/2009/10/us-book-tour.html
US Book Tour!I am excited to announce the signing dates and locations for my first US book tour!
Washington DCMonday October 19th9pm-10 pmMasa 141825 14th Street NW
Dallas TXTuesday October 20th7pm-9pmBarnes & Noble7700 West Northwest Hwy
San Francisco CAWednesday October 21st7:30pm-8:30pmPaul Smith50 Geary Street
Los Angeles CAThursday October 22nd8pm-10pmThe Beverly Center8500 Beverly Blvd8th Floor, Outdoor Terrace
All of these events are open to the public, I am excited to meet my readers in all of these cities! We are still working on more signings, so hopefully I will have events in a few other cities/countries.
― alex b. skeaton (tremendoid), Sunday, 11 October 2009 04:50 (sixteen years ago)
Now for those of us who have been afraid to wear leggings, fear no more. One of the biggest trends that have hit the runways and stores hard this season… JEGGINGS! Yes ladies, jean leggings. We must be extra careful with these as well. Jeggings have the same structure as leggings- very little. Though they are made to look more like jeans, it is probably a good idea we still keep our behind covered. Jeggings will provide us all a chance to stay in fashion while still remaining comfortable, but in order for us to be happy we must keep in mind the fashion aspect, or else they will not be around for long.Jeans are an item that will forever stay in style. Denim can be dressed up or dressed down and paired with almost any accessory. Jeans vary with each individual, that is what makes them so unique. Because of the several structures of jeans, there is a pair for every body type. The classic look of denim will never fade.Jeggings are comfortable and fashionable at the moment. Even names who are known for their quality denim have adapted this latest trend in their lines! They can fool other people into thinking they are actually jeans. Jeggings are a fabulous accessory to any ensemble as long as they are worn correctly. Jeggings are a hot trend for both spring and fall, so have fun, be comfortable, but wear them well!
Jeans are an item that will forever stay in style. Denim can be dressed up or dressed down and paired with almost any accessory. Jeans vary with each individual, that is what makes them so unique. Because of the several structures of jeans, there is a pair for every body type. The classic look of denim will never fade.
Jeggings are comfortable and fashionable at the moment. Even names who are known for their quality denim have adapted this latest trend in their lines! They can fool other people into thinking they are actually jeans. Jeggings are a fabulous accessory to any ensemble as long as they are worn correctly. Jeggings are a hot trend for both spring and fall, so have fun, be comfortable, but wear them well!
OH LOOK HERE'S SOME JEGGINGS
http://angelic242.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/20090313233139-jeggings.jpg
FFS, jeggings - the only item of clothing with its own Gawker hashtag.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 18 March 2010 19:39 (fifteen years ago)
OH NO, JEGGINGS ARE OVER
http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/3279/jeggings.png
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 18 March 2010 19:40 (fifteen years ago)
JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS JEGGINGS
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 18 March 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)
Granted, I wear my jeans tight enough they might as well be leggings...these Levi's 545s I bought last night are crazy stretchy.
― Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Thursday, 18 March 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)
*Starting to wonder if boys can share in the jeggings fun, too*
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 18 March 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)
laurel you mean jeggings!
― figgy pudding (La Lechera), Thursday, 18 March 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)
I've never meant anything less in my life.
― Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Thursday, 18 March 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)
CMON, JEGGINGS!
― figgy pudding (La Lechera), Thursday, 18 March 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)
Imagine if jeggings and dennings were around in '99:
http://forladiesbyladies.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/brit-375x550-denim.jpg
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 18 March 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)
I was so happy this thread was revived. Imagine my disappointment when it was re the worst thing known to man :(
― Not the real Village People, Thursday, 18 March 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)
man that picture is so amazing
― 69, Thursday, 18 March 2010 20:51 (fifteen years ago)
I took a picture in horror of a storefront proudly introducing their jeggings. Damn.
― she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Thursday, 18 March 2010 22:13 (fifteen years ago)
you have no idea how much I'd like to try on a pair of these
― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Thursday, 18 March 2010 22:39 (fifteen years ago)
http://racked.com/uploads/JessicaAlbaJeggings.jpg
Jessica Alba in pleather jeggings
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 18 March 2010 22:44 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwt8O5y-ix0
Pajamajeans - the deadly enemy of jeggings
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 18 March 2010 22:46 (fifteen years ago)
pleajameggings
― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Friday, 19 March 2010 00:04 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/08/fashion/garance-dore-the-style-blogger-snatches-the-spotlight.html?hpw&rref=fashion&_r=0
i never knew people thought she was not the best, being ignorant i always just assumed she was like the most important fashion person, from reading her blog
― j., Thursday, 8 May 2014 03:58 (eleven years ago)
are these still a thing? if so, do you have ones you like?
― marcos, Friday, 22 November 2019 17:54 (six years ago)