There. I needed to get that off my chest.
― The Reverend, Monday, 31 December 2007 11:35 (seventeen years ago)
by the use of the word 'pants' i take it this has caught on in the US too? we did a thread on 'skinny jeans' for men at one point.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 31 December 2007 11:38 (seventeen years ago)
i wear 'skinny jeans' because i am skinny
― J0rdan S., Monday, 31 December 2007 11:38 (seventeen years ago)
i wear distressed denim because, well.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 31 December 2007 11:40 (seventeen years ago)
I'm 6'0 and 130 lbs. Shit looks horrible.
― The Reverend, Monday, 31 December 2007 11:40 (seventeen years ago)
your legs would look like redwoods rev. i'm 5' 7" 135 so i can pull it off.
― J0rdan S., Monday, 31 December 2007 11:41 (seventeen years ago)
Tight pants on skinny men looks even more ridiculous than on bigger men.
― The Reverend, Monday, 31 December 2007 11:42 (seventeen years ago)
lol no
― J0rdan S., Monday, 31 December 2007 11:43 (seventeen years ago)
lol yes
― The Reverend, Monday, 31 December 2007 11:44 (seventeen years ago)
tight pants on men look great. grow up a few years past 21 and maybe you'll see. in the meantime maybe stop posting to ilx too????
― strgn, Monday, 31 December 2007 11:45 (seventeen years ago)
ALSO PLZ STOP CALLING YOURSELF 'THE REVEREND' FOR FUCKS SAKE
At least bigger guys have the excuse that they could just be wearing too small of pants rather than signaling to the entire world their intentions of looking in a douchelike way.
― The Reverend, Monday, 31 December 2007 11:46 (seventeen years ago)
Hey, strgn, why don't you go fuck off? Thxkbye.
these are the jeans i wear http://www.levisstore.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2350317&cp=2068573.2075200.2075206&parentPage=family
― J0rdan S., Monday, 31 December 2007 11:47 (seventeen years ago)
the dark color btw.
as if "strgn" is any less offensive than the reverend.
― J0rdan S., Monday, 31 December 2007 11:48 (seventeen years ago)
And it's not as if there isn't any acceptable medium between skinny and baggy, dude.
― The Reverend, Monday, 31 December 2007 11:49 (seventeen years ago)
tight pants on men look great.
no.
― That one guy that hit it and quit it, Monday, 31 December 2007 11:51 (seventeen years ago)
I'm 5'5, 135. I don't rock the skinny jeans like I used to, but sometimes they're all I've got left.
Wear lots of pinstripe pants these days oddly enough.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 31 December 2007 11:51 (seventeen years ago)
I am wearing kind of not-quite-pinstripe, but pinstripey pants right now.
― The Reverend, Monday, 31 December 2007 11:52 (seventeen years ago)
'strgn' is very offensive, especially since it's a word with an understandable meaning. love all yr gay insecurities. see:
http://img.timeinc.net/snow/content/images/06a/tight_M.jpg
have fun finding a sweetheart and mating for the benefit of the rest of humanity.
― strgn, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:03 (seventeen years ago)
What does "strgn" even mean? I just assumed it was a random group of letters.
― The Reverend, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:07 (seventeen years ago)
while back i thought it was jess in dis guys
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:08 (seventeen years ago)
no shit x-post
― strgn, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:08 (seventeen years ago)
I thought it was like Czech for "butthurt about pants" or something
― That mong guy that's shit, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:10 (seventeen years ago)
my pants make me butthurt
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:11 (seventeen years ago)
Oh my, that is offensive. J0rdan was right. (xp)
― The Reverend, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:13 (seventeen years ago)
strgn get off the reverends jock
― max, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:15 (seventeen years ago)
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/519W7KZF5TL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-dp-500-arrow,TopRight,45,-64_OU01_AA240_SH20_.jpg
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:16 (seventeen years ago)
yeah i've been a party pooper on this here thread. carry on
― strgn, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:31 (seventeen years ago)
Max, I think your use of the phrase "get off ____ jock", betrays your homosexual insecurities. Would you stop calling yourself 'max'?
― The Reverend, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:33 (seventeen years ago)
a/s/l
― max, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:38 (seventeen years ago)
want to cyber?
Let's take it offboard. Might be a bit embarrassing to have it hear where the folks can read.
― The Reverend, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:41 (seventeen years ago)
have it here...haha
speak of the devil
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:42 (seventeen years ago)
awesome thread
― Just got offed, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:43 (seventeen years ago)
are skinny jeans so bad? some people like clothing that wraps tightly around their groinal area. its snug.
― veryloggedout, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:44 (seventeen years ago)
I have underwear for that. I suppose some might prefer to go commando.
― The Reverend, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:44 (seventeen years ago)
i wouldn't presume to know what's good for everybody, but i'm not as comfortable with the nuthug as i once was.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:45 (seventeen years ago)
ok i said nuthug time to go home
fuckin graveyard shift
even awesomer thread
― Just got offed, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:45 (seventeen years ago)
plus, you can swap with your GF if you have skinny jeans.
― veryloggedout, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:45 (seventeen years ago)
^ have done this
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:46 (seventeen years ago)
although she cant swap with you.
― veryloggedout, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:46 (seventeen years ago)
I think a woman would have to be of Amazonian stature to swap pants with me. I am tall and about 80% legs at that.
― The Reverend, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:48 (seventeen years ago)
daniella_hantuchova.jpg
― Just got offed, Monday, 31 December 2007 12:50 (seventeen years ago)
lol. i look great in tight pants.
― Surmounter, Monday, 31 December 2007 13:30 (seventeen years ago)
Tight pants on men look ridiculous.
-- The Reverend, Monday, 31 December 2007 22:35 (2 days ago) Bookmark Link
Put them on your legs and see what happens.
― Autumn Almanac, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 14:45 (seventeen years ago)
I knew I was doing something wrong.
― The Reverend, Tuesday, 1 January 2008 17:11 (seventeen years ago)
http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/3420/imageuploadimageqq6.jpg http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/8079/imageuploadimageyh6.jpg http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/3858/imageuploadimageep7.jpg
― libcrypt, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 20:37 (seventeen years ago)
type pants on men look ridiculous?
― latebloomer, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 20:38 (seventeen years ago)
perv
― elmo argonaut, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 20:39 (seventeen years ago)
777777777777777777777777777777777
― robertwolf8080, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 20:43 (seventeen years ago)
-- BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, December 31, 2007 5:51 AM (3 months ago) Bookmark Link
o_O
― deej, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 20:45 (seventeen years ago)
I'm wearing a pinstripe suit, which is 50% pants. They aren't tight though.
― kingkongvsgodzilla, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 21:00 (seventeen years ago)
q. where do levi's 514s fit in all this
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 21:00 (seventeen years ago)
a. snug to my nuts
― El Tomboto, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 21:01 (seventeen years ago)
supposed to wear 514s hanging 3/4 off your ass.
― Dan I., Tuesday, 22 April 2008 21:18 (seventeen years ago)
op otm
― deej, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 21:22 (seventeen years ago)
robertwolf8080 otm assuming he means the jeans
― bnw, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 21:24 (seventeen years ago)
i had a guy in my shop the other day and i swear to god he was wearing women's jeans. they were so tight. urgh. i could see his boxer shorts and his package was bulging. No wonder, even if he had peanuts, it would have bulged, so XXXXS petite sized jeans...
I really wanted to scream: NOOOOOOOOOOOOO.
― stevienixed, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 21:29 (seventeen years ago)
at wal-mart last night two high school kids asked me where i got my levi 511 skinnys
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 22 April 2008 21:30 (seventeen years ago)
reports from the front lines
― deej, Tuesday, 22 April 2008 21:31 (seventeen years ago)
damn a hoos is short
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 22 April 2008 21:33 (seventeen years ago)
-- The Reverend, Monday, December 31, 2007 5:35 AM (3 months ago) Bookmark Link http://www.bradblog.com/Images/siren.gifCHALLENGING OPINIONhttp://www.bradblog.com/Images/siren.gif
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 22 April 2008 21:35 (seventeen years ago)
u guys are a bunch of little girls. you care more about zinging each other than discussing the topic(s) at hand
― jaxon, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 01:25 (seventeen years ago)
i was going to make the 77777777 joke but mine went 77777yyyyyyyhhhhhh7777yyyyhhh77yyhh7yhhh77yy etc
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 01:28 (seventeen years ago)
-- deej, Tuesday, April 22, 2008 4:22 PM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Link
what more is there to say jaxon
― deej, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 01:30 (seventeen years ago)
i am very thin (5'9, 145) and especially thin in the legs...and i am continually flabbergasted how "standard" jeans fit me so tight...i am like the thinnest guy i know and i can barely fit into them!!! who in the hell wears those things?
― ryan, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 01:35 (seventeen years ago)
Can someone pls explain this new men's emo-jeans trend of the legs being ultra-tight stovepipes, but they're not only low slung hipsters, they have a massively baggy groin area, all hanging down between the guy's legs like a nappy.
C'mon, I know fashion is a spaz but guys, you look like you pooed your pants. And they make you walk funny. They're not a good look. Why do guys think their pants falling off, buttcrack and whiteys hangin' out, is ever a good look? Ew.
― Trayce, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 01:41 (seventeen years ago)
^^^That's mostly what I was inarticulately railing against when I made this.
― The Reverend, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 01:46 (seventeen years ago)
Trayce otm
― wilter, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 01:46 (seventeen years ago)
skinny jeans
― burt_stanton, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 01:47 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah I mean I love stovepipes on slim guys - dude in tight black jeans, winklepickers and big hair can look great - but this pants-falling-off palaver has to stop, before I openly point and laugh at some lad in the street. I swear I'm gonna do it one day.
(as it is, me and my bf play a "punch in the arm" game whenever either of us sees a dude with a popped collar. If we ever go shopping in chapel st my arms are sore as fuck after half a day).
― Trayce, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 01:53 (seventeen years ago)
The only "skinny jeans lol" I think that look ridiculous are the ones that look like they're vacuum sealed on the dude... seems like that's the trend now.
That whole early 80s super straight leg thing, that's fine, especially for the skinny dudes who had to suffer during the super-baggy clothing craze of the 90s when size S = XXL.
― burt_stanton, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 02:01 (seventeen years ago)
yeah, when they look like tights, it's the worst
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2349/2158783871_09a048fafa.jpg?v=0
― jaxon, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 02:15 (seventeen years ago)
That outfit is kind of amazing.
― ENBB, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 02:20 (seventeen years ago)
Michael Alig having a lot to answer for in that outfit there. LOL klub kidz.
― suzy, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 10:47 (seventeen years ago)
C'mon, I know fashion is a spaz but guys, you look like you pooed your pants.
Hey can you give some pictorial examples? I don't think you're talking about what jaxon posted
― Vichitravirya_XI, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 11:05 (seventeen years ago)
>especially for the skinny dudes who had to suffer during the super-baggy clothing craze of the 90s when size S = XXL.
This is a good point too. I remember once noting how at least another person's legs could comfortably fit into those damned "cargo pants" I was wearing. Maybe that has more to do with me
― Vichitravirya_XI, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 11:06 (seventeen years ago)
this was mentioned on another thread, there's a name for it - "slouch skinny" or something and yes it's utterly ridiculous.. i see it as an attempt to have your skinny cake but eat your hip-hop too
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 11:21 (seventeen years ago)
dude in tight black jeans, winklepickers and big hair
If he wore sensibly sized trousers, he wouldn't be pickin' at his winkle.
― kingkongvsgodzilla, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 11:29 (seventeen years ago)
we should all remember mr miyagi's words of wisdom - "tight jeans - safe; baggy jeans - safe; but if man wear jeans are skinny at bottom but baggy on top, sooner or later someone will make joke about him incontinence"
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 11:34 (seventeen years ago)
> i see it as an attempt to have your skinny cake but eat your hip-hop too
Maybe also a way to generate "room" for your testicles but keep the legs fashionably slim
― Vichitravirya_XI, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 11:44 (seventeen years ago)
I'm not talking a little baggy, here - I've seen pants with the crotch join halfway to the knees, with no exaggeration.
― Trayce, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 11:48 (seventeen years ago)
what these crotchsters really want is the late lamented chi-pants, which had a diamond-shaped gusset in the crotch. i had a black cotton pair and i have to say they were pretty awesome. recalled here:
http://www.pigdog.org/auto/special_ideas/link/2213.html
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 11:49 (seventeen years ago)
it ain't only some guys who need to stop wearing the skinny jeans - i see soooo many tubby girls wearing these tapered, skin tight jeans with the big ol' muffin hanging out over the top. i just want to yell DUDE IT'S OK TO BE TUBS BUT NOT IN THOSE PANTS
― Rubyredd, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 12:06 (seventeen years ago)
. Look at your crotch. If what you see looks like the intersection of State and Main, then you don't have them. If what you see is a diamond-shaped panel that gives you a vast range of motion for all the kung-fu moves you don't know how to do, then congratulations! You're wearing Chi-Pants
― Vichitravirya_XI, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 12:11 (seventeen years ago)
i just want to yell DUDE IT'S OK TO BE TUBS BUT NOT IN THOSE PANTS
Exactly - this drives me nuts. Someone needs to teach them about the value of learning to dress for your body type.
― ENBB, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 12:26 (seventeen years ago)
http://m.assetbar.com/achewood/autaux?b=M%5ea11f09b8576e606bcb5038dfdb92fb821&u=http%3A%2F%2Fachewood.com%2Fcomic.php%3Fdate%3D08182004
― Mark C, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 13:48 (seventeen years ago)
haha I regret having missed the tight pants skirmish of '08. Although I'm still unclear on how tight the tight pants that mr. Revrend objects to are. Sometimes you want your pants to say, "Hey, I'm comfy" and sometimes you want them to say, "Oh yeah, baby. That's my ass. You are NOT dreaming." A time for every purpose under heaven.
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 14:55 (seventeen years ago)
kenan the Rev is specifically railing against tight pants that are NOT tight in the butt
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 14:56 (seventeen years ago)
Wasn't there something historical that resembled this, where men were still wearing tight stocking-like things but looser cloth around the fork of the body?
― Vichitravirya_XI, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:04 (seventeen years ago)
UH JODHPURS. Salwar kameez. Hammertime?
― suzy, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:06 (seventeen years ago)
Well, stockings used to be two separate pieces that tied to yr shirt with "points"...and the two giant socks left a gap in the middle, hence the codpiece.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:08 (seventeen years ago)
Sounds like having a poo was extra fun in the olde days.
See? Just be happy that we have PANTS.
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:12 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.retrojunk.com/img/art-images/snl88154.jpg
http://www.retrojunk.com/img/art-images/snl88155.jpg
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:20 (seventeen years ago)
aw shit.
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:23 (seventeen years ago)
Hammer time! I was definitely thinking of Hammer-time pants, unconsciously. I am awaiting actually their revival, and within two-three years of that wearing clothing backwards a la Kriss Kross. I'd be happy if the rest of the 90s can just be skipped and we wind up where we are now - before these balloon-pants things
― Vichitravirya_XI, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:23 (seventeen years ago)
I was given a pair of Chip n Pepper tight jeans yesterday. they are low rise with flared bottoms and they fit but I hate them. Problem is I can't afford jeans off the rack (even if that rack is Goodwill) so they will have to do u_u
― wanko ergo sum, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:24 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.discogs.com/image/R-890352-1189535599.jpeg
― Z S, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:39 (seventeen years ago)
acceptable?
http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t214/ZachRScott/ramones.jpg
― Z S, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:40 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.alispeaks.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/skinny-jeans-nyt.jpg
― Z S, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:41 (seventeen years ago)
http://levi.imageg.net/graphics/product_images/pLEVI1-3554751p275w.jpg
― Z S, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:42 (seventeen years ago)
i'm built like joey ramone so everything i wear is skinny. yet never tight.
― chicago kevin, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:46 (seventeen years ago)
Yes, and yes except for wtf pink shoes. The pair in the middle does look a little more snug than ideal, but whatever.
I think more than anything that secon pic is about the importance of your choice of shoe. (The boots win.)
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:48 (seventeen years ago)
You know, my biggest objection to the contemporary tight jean is how it puddles around the ankles. I prefer them shorter (to wear and to look at).
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:53 (seventeen years ago)
Then you risk the Urkel. I probably look like Urkel a lot.
― Z S, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 15:58 (seventeen years ago)
Teh Ramonez are not remotely Urkel!
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:02 (seventeen years ago)
i like to show off my cool socks a little down there! so yeah, a bit shorter is good. but depends on the shoes sometimes.
― andrew m., Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:03 (seventeen years ago)
You risk more than the Urkel sometimes; witness Mr. Pink Shoes above. They might still be ok if he hadn't... done THAT to his pants. "Hi, I wish I was a little girl, also check out my package." You need years and years of therapy.
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:04 (seventeen years ago)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2268/2423513416_aa62a956ec.jpg
sometimes you need to go all tight-pants poindexter / emcee from cabaret on a yacht and just let the haters hate themselves till they blue in the face
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:08 (seventeen years ago)
Notice how they're standing completely still. They were probably flashing some serious ankle.
― kingkongvsgodzilla, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:09 (seventeen years ago)
^^^ my opinion towards this photo is largely "I may not agree with what you're wearing but I will defend to the death your right to wear it"
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:10 (seventeen years ago)
xpost
Elmo they are basically adorable, it's true. Gayer than WH Auden and Christopher Isherwood comparing their notes on Bangkok boy baths. Gayer than Lance Bass, dancing with Billy Madison, on the S.S. Polesmoker, to the Pet Shop Boys. But cuet.
(Credit for the above goes to some guy on youtube who makes me laff.)
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:17 (seventeen years ago)
Man jeans are tough for me. I'm 6'1" and about 140lbs or so and NOTHING FITS ME EVER. Even with sorta skinny jeans I need a damn belt. Like I need to wear fairly skinny pants just so they don't feel and look all danglydroopy, but it's difficult to find the balance between "these fit me" and "painted on megabulge".
Oh and I have a friend where wears pants that like...well have you seen that bit in uh...was it Superbad? Where the fat kid had the most ridiculous jeans ever? Exactly like that, but with more boxers sticking out. It's crazy tight.
― RabiesAngentleman, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:24 (seventeen years ago)
I wish more appropriate people actually had the ""painted on megabulge" and the ones who weren't, couldn't even be allowed to think about it
― Vichitravirya_XI, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:46 (seventeen years ago)
xpost Megabulge, huh? You think so? ;)
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:49 (seventeen years ago)
Show me yours I'll show you mine. I believe I mentioned 11 inches on dat other thread
― Vichitravirya_XI, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:50 (seventeen years ago)
And that's 11 inches when it's still "bulged" not unwrapped
― Vichitravirya_XI, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:51 (seventeen years ago)
Vichi 8080, the "whiskering" effect on jeans is a definite signifier of masculinity among the fashion victim set, also it looks fucking stupid
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:52 (seventeen years ago)
UH o_0
http://bulgingjeans.blogspot.com/
― Vichitravirya_XI, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:52 (seventeen years ago)
THATS MY BLOG GUYS. HOPE YOU LIKE
― Vichitravirya_XI, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:53 (seventeen years ago)
I GOT SOME OF THAT SHIT PUBLISHED IN PITCHFORK AND VILLAGE VOICE PRE-EVIL TAKEOVAH
http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/517/transformer7sg.png
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:53 (seventeen years ago)
Even with sorta skinny jeans I need a damn belt.
Dude this is normal. Did you think belts were just for people who have the wrong size of pants?
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:53 (seventeen years ago)
elmo, you don't like bulges? are you no longer gay? i thought I saw your cute pic on the Appletini thread :(
― Vichitravirya_XI, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:54 (seventeen years ago)
http://bp0.blogger.com/_Ku5C-tXG6hc/R_lPlW6wl_I/AAAAAAAACpo/OW73Wd_dv8c/s1600-h/jnr1a.jpg
― Vichitravirya_XI, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 16:56 (seventeen years ago)
yeah didn't think that would flyyy
bulges are fine by me
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:03 (seventeen years ago)
this isn't my thing, but i don't get the problem here
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:03 (seventeen years ago)
wear some too-small sweatpants and you'll definitely have everyone's attention
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:04 (seventeen years ago)
I love the way pants from H&M fit me, just right in the butt, and not so much megabulge but definitely Penis: Extant! It's a shame they only live for like a year.
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:11 (seventeen years ago)
tmi dude
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:12 (seventeen years ago)
Hey I'm not the one claiming to have a snake.
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:16 (seventeen years ago)
thank you very much
― carne asada, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:16 (seventeen years ago)
wow, this thread went wtf pretty quickly huh?
― chicago kevin, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:18 (seventeen years ago)
they always do
― El Tomboto, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:18 (seventeen years ago)
The sad tragiocomic truth is, the tight skinny jeans for men from Urban Outfitters really are the perfect tight skinny jeans anywhere in the known universe - but no hipster will admit to buying/owning/wearing them
― Vichitravirya_XI, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:19 (seventeen years ago)
very sad, yes
― gabbneb, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:21 (seventeen years ago)
-- Tracer Hand, Wednesday, April 23, 2008 11:53 AM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
Do most people NEED a belt literally every pair of pants they own?
― RabiesAngentleman, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:23 (seventeen years ago)
if they want to look put together, it's kind of required in some places
― Vichitravirya_XI, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:24 (seventeen years ago)
wait, kenan has a snake that only lives for a year at a time and lives in his pants?
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:24 (seventeen years ago)
Sure, but will their pants stay up otherwise? (xpost) Because mine don't, really.
― RabiesAngentleman, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:25 (seventeen years ago)
http://blogs.chron.com/blog9/snake.bmp
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:26 (seventeen years ago)
whoa wtf is that from?
― RabiesAngentleman, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:27 (seventeen years ago)
snakepants: the movie
― Mr. Que, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:28 (seventeen years ago)
"escape from my pants"
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:30 (seventeen years ago)
snakepants: the pants that snake people
Wait am I the only person who uses the word snake in place of steal?
― RabiesAngentleman, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:31 (seventeen years ago)
On the Hercules and Love Affair record, Antony structures this interesting word usement:
Don't lie to me Don't make it up Don't snake it up Don't snake it up my friend
"Snake it up"... I kinda like it! "I thought we were so in love, and then I found out that all this time he'd been snaking it up."
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:41 (seventeen years ago)
So I snake, yeah Just keep it on the down low Said nobody supposed to know
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:45 (seventeen years ago)
I H8 PLISKIN
― Abbott, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:48 (seventeen years ago)
Way way more than any pants except maybe those keyboard ones.
snaaaaaaaaaaake
http://www.viceland.com/int/dos_donts/1343/main.jpg
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:52 (seventeen years ago)
question? what is the "whiskering effect"?
― Jesse, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:54 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.ruckersclothing.co.uk/images/uploads/avi-parl.jpg
lol crotch has whiskers
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:56 (seventeen years ago)
but those are obviously fake i really hate pre-faded jeans now esp when they're as weak as that
― sleep, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:58 (seventeen years ago)
Denimist.
― Laurel, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:59 (seventeen years ago)
the ramones cover upthread has plenty of AUTHENTIC whiskering ;-)
― sleep, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:59 (seventeen years ago)
Oh. Yuck. Maybe if it looked slightly more natural, but that is as ugly as a brunette with solid streaked highlights.
― Jesse, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 17:59 (seventeen years ago)
xpost.
― Jesse, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 18:00 (seventeen years ago)
lol "escape from my pants"
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 18:07 (seventeen years ago)
Dude carrying around a snake is bad enough, but what is that sticking out from under his shirt? An opossum, maybe?
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 18:17 (seventeen years ago)
leather fannypack :( :(
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 18:20 (seventeen years ago)
I don't see a Dave Foley link:
I won’t be doing Hecubus this time around, I’m very pleased to say... I don’t want to wear the damn tights anywhere! I’ve seen video of me as a middle-aged man in tights, and it’s not very pleasant. Playing that character as a skinny boy was one thing; it’s just not as cute as it was.
http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2008/04/the_kids_in_the_halls_dave_fol.html
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 19:16 (seventeen years ago)
i am wearing tight jeans
― jaxon, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 19:25 (seventeen years ago)
to do:
1. no more tights, ever. 2. get teeth fixed
― kenan, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 19:25 (seventeen years ago)
morbs i saw foley do hecubus on the 'tour of duty' tour, so unfortunate
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 19:32 (seventeen years ago)
I read this thread title as "Tight pants on me look ridiculous".
― Aimless, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 19:37 (seventeen years ago)
i've already told the Hecubus 1989 live boner story
― Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 19:49 (seventeen years ago)
live boner
Your favourite charity?
― Mark C, Wednesday, 23 April 2008 19:59 (seventeen years ago)
I like all the pics Z.S. posted. Everything there looks good but the WTF pink shoes and rolled-up cuffs. I super love the last one with white loafers and the shiny belt. Would hit.
Jeans should be skinny. Tight non-jean pants on men look gross, even on Mick Jagger in the early 1960s.
Denim shorts depress me about the prospects for the human race. ;_;
― felicity, Thursday, 24 April 2008 07:21 (seventeen years ago)
That's what happens when you don't have hips! It doesn't mean you're weird or that your pants are the wrong size though. And with low-rise jeans it's the only way to avoid showing the world your crack.
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 24 April 2008 09:50 (seventeen years ago)
Those low riding girl jeans are weird. Even scrawny girls look all pudge in 'em, and girls who don't belong in 'em wear 'em all the goddamn time. The pants that say hey check out my thong and tramp stamp and weird butt mole I'm not ashamed of for some reason. lol bar scene.
― RabiesAngentleman, Thursday, 24 April 2008 14:24 (seventeen years ago)
that's pretty good. try here for more:
What is the correct way to make fun of girls wearing hip-huggers?
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 24 April 2008 14:30 (seventeen years ago)
Haha, butt cleavage. Once I was at work (grocery store)...no, this has happened twice...I walk by and look down and isle and notice an astonishing amount of plumber butt. And then it hits me, it's one of my bosses on her knees monkeying with something the bottom shelf-- Should have known, you can seriously smell her two isles away.
All that crack from a regular pair of khakis. Gal must have a horrible time.
― RabiesAngentleman, Thursday, 24 April 2008 16:03 (seventeen years ago)
Even scrawny girls look all pudge in 'em,
you're saying this like it's a bad thing...
― chicago kevin, Thursday, 24 April 2008 16:09 (seventeen years ago)
"coinslot"
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 24 April 2008 16:20 (seventeen years ago)
-- chicago kevin, Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:09 AM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
Sorry, I meant it like it's a weird thing. I'm actually not into scrawny girls at all, which doesn't work out in my also scrawny favor since the ones I like usually outweigh me a bit. They don't seem to like that.
― RabiesAngentleman, Thursday, 24 April 2008 16:24 (seventeen years ago)
pudge = A+ in my book.
― chicago kevin, Thursday, 24 April 2008 16:36 (seventeen years ago)
best to not let them hear you call it "pudge" i think?
― elmo argonaut, Thursday, 24 April 2008 16:39 (seventeen years ago)
least of my obstacles at the moment.
― chicago kevin, Thursday, 24 April 2008 16:40 (seventeen years ago)
I have always, always envied the ultra-rail-thin look. I have what could be termed "pudge." The grass is etc etc.
― Jesse, Thursday, 24 April 2008 19:35 (seventeen years ago)
I'm actually not into scrawny girls at all, which doesn't work out in my also scrawny favor since the ones I like usually outweigh me a bit. They don't seem to like that.
-- RabiesAngentleman, Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:24 AM (Thursday, April 24, 2008 9:24 AM) Bookmark Link
My sad reality.
― rev, Thursday, 24 April 2008 19:41 (seventeen years ago)
bench-pressin' the honeys
― remy bean, Thursday, 24 April 2008 19:43 (seventeen years ago)
I don't know, girls keep dating my roommates and they're like toothpicks wrapped in black denim. The girls tend to be young and...I'm not sure how bright, but hey.
― Laurel, Thursday, 24 April 2008 19:43 (seventeen years ago)
I agree re: the tight trousers thing. Slim fit is okay though.
― jel --, Thursday, 24 April 2008 19:44 (seventeen years ago)
That didn't come out right.
― jel --, Thursday, 24 April 2008 19:45 (seventeen years ago)
me and last serious girlfriend would have combined to be about 12 feet, 245 lbs. of human.
― chicago kevin, Thursday, 24 April 2008 19:45 (seventeen years ago)
Kevin maybe you should take up glam-rock stylings and the world's tightest black jeans. And flat-iron your hair. I hear 14-yr olds go for that.
― Laurel, Thursday, 24 April 2008 19:47 (seventeen years ago)
oh, hey, i didn't tell you. i got my annual haircut about two weeks ago. no hair to iron.
― chicago kevin, Thursday, 24 April 2008 19:51 (seventeen years ago)
Just in time for spring!
― Laurel, Thursday, 24 April 2008 19:55 (seventeen years ago)
the ones I like usually outweigh me a bit. They don't seem to like that
I can identify with that. I'm five ten and a size ten so not exactly tiny and I've always had a hard time dating scrawny guys even though I often find them attractive. In the end I think height is more important to me then weight though. Tall and skinny is A-ok. Then again my on again off again boyfriend from years ago was about five six and 90 pounds soaking wet.
― ENBB, Thursday, 24 April 2008 20:00 (seventeen years ago)
i made my bf weigh himself the other day just to make sure he didn't weigh less than me!
― bell_labs, Thursday, 24 April 2008 20:18 (seventeen years ago)
does he?
― chicago kevin, Thursday, 24 April 2008 20:20 (seventeen years ago)
haaaa xpost
― rrrobyn, Thursday, 24 April 2008 20:20 (seventeen years ago)
no! surprisingly.
― bell_labs, Thursday, 24 April 2008 20:22 (seventeen years ago)
poor form on my part to ask, sorry. but having met him i know he borders on the elfen so...
― chicago kevin, Thursday, 24 April 2008 20:28 (seventeen years ago)
He's tall, though. And kind of rangy. I bet I still outweigh him but I am made of bricks.
― Laurel, Thursday, 24 April 2008 20:29 (seventeen years ago)
laurel is mighty might, just lettin' it all hang out.
― chicago kevin, Thursday, 24 April 2008 20:30 (seventeen years ago)
"the ones I like usually outweigh me a bit. They don't seem to like that"
-- ENBB, Thursday, April 24, 2008 3:00 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Link
Yeah, it never seems to stop more generously proportioned gals from dating me (must be the height), but it always leads to these futile debates. They usually begin with some kind of flirtatious comment on my part about how nice they're looking, and then it just disintegrates into, like, "I'm faaaatt", "Yeah dude, sweet!", "HORRIBLESCREEEECHINGSOUND!!!!" Ok my actual response is usually more of a sheepish, "but I like how you look" (and on into why), but it just winds up being this horrible, futile game of Kriegspiel w/o a referee, and then I don't get laid because I said she looks gorgeous in those pants. Kind of an extreme example there, but to varying degrees I've had the exact same problem with nearly every girl I've been involved with, regardless of body type.
― RabiesAngentleman, Saturday, 26 April 2008 15:47 (seventeen years ago)
yup, im pretty tallish and sturdy and I'm not usually attracted to super skinny guys (mainly because I don't think they'd be into me); but yeah, if they are tall I can sometimes make acceptions. Small and slight I just think, YEEEE i will crush you!
― homosexual II, Saturday, 26 April 2008 16:38 (seventeen years ago)
Dear Lord
― hyggeligt, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 08:20 (seventeen years ago)
I saw two young men wearing these. Because of the uncontrollable grin I had on my face, I think they thought I was checking them out.
I truly can't articulate the silliness of this garment in real-life. The missing part of the picture is that you can't really walk in these pants. You just kind of shuffle-walk, sort of like when you have to run to the phone while in the middle of going to the bathroom.
― aldo, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 08:29 (seventeen years ago)
oh my, that is quite incredible.
― CharlieNo4, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 12:45 (seventeen years ago)
what convinced the wonka company to license the pattern for the oompa-loompa uniform pants to denim makers?? //78*^#*()EUUAKHaaughhhhhh
― elmo argonaut, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 12:51 (seventeen years ago)
PLEASE LET THESE CATCH ON OH PLEASE OH PLEASE
― RabiesAngentleman, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 13:14 (seventeen years ago)
If this becomes a serious trend I will not stop laughing for a decade.
thank you, Soulful Commandoe
― andrew m., Wednesday, 30 April 2008 14:27 (seventeen years ago)
well, they're not exactly new....
in denim: http://streetpeeper.com/?p=1207
in cotton: http://streetpeeper.com/?p=3964 http://streetpeeper.com/?p=3071
― phil-two, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:07 (seventeen years ago)
all of those are variously less offensive than the 'soulful commandoe' version but i still think they look stupid.
― Doraemon, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:10 (seventeen years ago)
the soulful commandoe is pretty awful, but i actually like some of the drop crotch/harem'y pants. not the denim ones though
― phil-two, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:13 (seventeen years ago)
omg second of phil's links is killing me
(hi phil!)
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:14 (seventeen years ago)
the real problem with skinny jeans as any guy will tell you is that it's very difficult to keep 1) cigarettes 2) keys 3) phone 4) ipod 5) wallet 6) earbuds 7) lighter in the pockets with looking and feeling like you've turned into one of those comme des garcons lumpy people - these trousers solve the problem!
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 15:16 (seventeen years ago)
Don't forget 8) the balls TH. THE BALLS. What are 6) earbuds ???
The guy in phil's first link knows how to rock them shits proper.
― RabiesAngentleman, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 17:25 (seventeen years ago)
lol ate the balls
Oh fuck. I have to destroy the world now.
― The Reverend, Thursday, 1 May 2008 04:30 (seventeen years ago)
the real problem with skinny jeans as any guy will tell you is that it's very difficult to keep 1) cigarettes 2) keys 3) phone 4) ipod 5) wallet 6) earbuds 7) lighter in the pockets with looking and feeling like you've turned into one of those comme des garcons lumpy people
thats what gay tote bags are for!!
― phil-two, Thursday, 1 May 2008 09:46 (seventeen years ago)
fricking tote bags
honestly, once the weather actually gets nice i have no idea how i'm going to carry around what i need
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 May 2008 10:48 (seventeen years ago)
http://images.cafepress.com/product/152229244v10_240x240_Front.jpg
this maybe?
― phil-two, Thursday, 1 May 2008 13:02 (seventeen years ago)
I don't know if I could lie like that
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 May 2008 13:29 (seventeen years ago)
what about this one i designed?
http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/9638/totesau0.jpg
― jaxon, Thursday, 1 May 2008 17:52 (seventeen years ago)
Tote bags on men look ridiculous, but I like them anyway
― gabbneb, Thursday, 1 May 2008 17:53 (seventeen years ago)
backpack, yo.
― RabiesAngentleman, Friday, 2 May 2008 05:01 (seventeen years ago)
Totesally Dude
― J0rdan S., Friday, 2 May 2008 05:03 (seventeen years ago)
tote bags are the worst look on a man to ever exist on the planet
come to think of it they suck on women too
you heard it here first: tote bags are done. like, really done.
where do we now stand on the tight pants issue? are 511's a bad look? i love a good loose fit too i'm just tryin' to get opinions here.
― surm, Wednesday, 30 January 2013 15:48 (twelve years ago)