― Tracer Hand, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― mark s, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― cozen¡ (Cozen), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:01 (twenty-two years ago)
The Thin Red Line is great but not as deep as it thinks it is. And ultimately less than the sum of its parts.
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:06 (twenty-two years ago)
Thin red line. hm. i like most of it but its killed by its Cameos. Seeing George Clooney two minutes from the end almost negated the rest of the film for me. Also Travolta is in it too and he's the most horrible actor ever.
― jed (jed_e_3), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― cozen¡ (Cozen), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:18 (twenty-two years ago)
(xp: jed is right)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:19 (twenty-two years ago)
amateurist has argued eloquently elsewhere (and in part me reviving these threads is an attempt to bait him out with any points he may have since developed his argument with) that the sound of the film, the 'through-composed' feel, the contrapunction, a medley of melodies whatever etc is u&k and fascinating.
― cozen¡ (Cozen), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― cozen¡ (Cozen), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed (jed_e_3), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 3 January 2004 01:48 (twenty-two years ago)
(there are some pretty choppy moments. some seem perverse, others seem the result of the infamous studio pressures of which malick has complained.)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 04:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 04:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 04:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 04:10 (twenty-one years ago)
re. "days of heaven":
the rhythms are very strange. the sound design is strange. the pervasive quiet is very strange.
(i have to say i find the lead actress really unappealing. but the little girl is the strangest and most fascinating of all the film's elements.)
it's interesting to think of this film and "badlands" (and i guess "the thin red line") coming out the revisionist cycle of films that kicked off with "the chase" and "bonnie & clyde" etc. and they *are* revisionist readings of american history, albeit very unorthodox compared to the likes of "soldier blue" or even "heaven's gate."
sam shepard talks in this movie just like terrence malick!! it's weird.
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 04:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 04:17 (twenty-one years ago)
"where ya goin?"
"fuh a walk."
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 05:12 (twenty-one years ago)
"i was hoping t'ing's'd work out fuh her, shewas a good friend a mine."
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 05:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 05:14 (twenty-one years ago)
(i think these lines pretty well presage david gordon green's approach to dialogue)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 05:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 06:21 (twenty-one years ago)
go to bed s1ocki
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 06:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 06:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 06:32 (twenty-one years ago)
Soft Cell -- classic or dud?
i just got this sinking feeling in my stomach when i realized that malick's next movie is pocahontas starring colin farrell.
i have no fear
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 06:35 (twenty-one years ago)
Thin Red Line in one act:
CHUKKA CHUKKA CHUKKA
Oh God I'm shot!
Oh God I'm dying!
Oh God you're dying! I am sad!
Oh God war is hell! How enlightening!
― Tonight at ten (kenan), Thursday, 9 September 2004 06:41 (twenty-one years ago)
Days Of Heaven is incredible, and the train on the viaduct is one of my favourite shots ever.
― Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 9 September 2004 06:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― EComplex (EComplex), Thursday, 9 September 2004 07:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Thursday, 9 September 2004 11:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Maria D. (Maria D.), Thursday, 9 September 2004 11:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 9 September 2004 11:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― n/a (Nick A.), Thursday, 9 September 2004 13:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Maria D. (Maria D.), Thursday, 9 September 2004 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)
why?
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 9 September 2004 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Maria D. (Maria D.), Thursday, 9 September 2004 15:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 9 September 2004 15:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:08 (twenty-one years ago)
i like how the "flashbacks" are ambiguous as to whether they are imaginative speculation, memory, or genuine flashbacks... also the part where witt's mother is dying and the camera tilts upward and the room has no roof
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:15 (twenty-one years ago)
part of that flashback with the mother that always gets me: why do we see that (empty) birdcage again on Guadacanal?
― ryan (ryan), Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:18 (twenty-one years ago)
we also hear the grandfather clock on the soundtrack several other times?
xpost
i don't recall b&w either... will have to watch again...
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:55 (twenty-one years ago)
(that's not to discount the cajun hoedown in DOH, or the leo kottke train theme...)
― amateur!!st, Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)
It took me a second to realize you weren't talking about "Total Request Live."
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 9 September 2004 19:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 20:04 (twenty-one years ago)
all films should be "all surface"
― amateur!!st, Wednesday, 29 September 2004 06:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Aaron W (Aaron W), Saturday, 2 October 2004 01:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!!!st (amateurist), Saturday, 2 October 2004 07:14 (twenty-one years ago)
"what a nice thing to say."
― amateur!!st, Tuesday, 9 November 2004 21:41 (twenty-one years ago)
i would watch this again, if i had to, though.
― caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 01:42 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 01:46 (twenty years ago)
― caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 01:49 (twenty years ago)
i got tired of it always being in the late afternoon
ha
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 02:02 (twenty years ago)
― caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 02:04 (twenty years ago)
― gear (gear), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 02:07 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 02:08 (twenty years ago)
i never studied movies in college, but i love this one
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 02:27 (twenty years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 02:33 (twenty years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 04:11 (twenty years ago)
― k/l (Ken L), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 05:09 (twenty years ago)
― k/l (Ken L), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 05:10 (twenty years ago)
i just watched this italian documentary about malick called "rosy fingered dawn" (ack) which was made just after the thin red line came out. i suppose it's pretty good but there's a hell of a lot of padding in it since they don't use much of the film footage (so you end up looking at shots of crazy people in new york streets, for some reason) and, obviously, there's no malick in it.
there's a few LOLs as jim caviezel and elias koteas strain for profundity in the interview sections but end up near enough making complete fools of themselves. i still like that koteas dude though. very interesting contributions from haskell wexler, arthur penn and jack fisk. worth seeing if you can get a hold of it.
― jed_, Monday, 22 October 2007 02:26 (eighteen years ago)
not long now...
http://www.criterion.com/content/images/full_boxshot/409_box_348x490.jpg
I need a job to get money to buy this. And do other things, but buy this mostly.
― Gukbe, Monday, 22 October 2007 03:00 (eighteen years ago)
to get a job*
my mind, i swear.
want
― s1ocki, Monday, 22 October 2007 03:03 (eighteen years ago)
jim caviezel and elias koteas strain for profundity in the interview sections but end up near enough making complete fools of themselves
"straining for profundity" kind of sums up my feelings about everything malick's done post-badlands. what i'll say for days of heaven is that it's somewhat better than the other two overblown junkers he's deigned to twiddle with since.
jesus, imdb says his next movie is called "tree of life." kill me now.
― tipsy mothra, Monday, 22 October 2007 04:30 (eighteen years ago)
ha ^
― sweatpants life trajectory (schlump), Friday, 19 August 2011 22:12 (fourteen years ago)
i find myself watching "the thin red line" for the second evening in row, except this time i am drunk
― mark s, Saturday, 5 November 2011 22:35 (fourteen years ago)
maybe this time i will in fact realise that war is bad mkay
― mark s, Saturday, 5 November 2011 22:37 (fourteen years ago)
i turned all the lights off so cannot* be distracted by shallow trivia
*certainly untrue
― mark s, Saturday, 5 November 2011 22:39 (fourteen years ago)
sorry but i think you're being disrepectful to this meditation on the brutality of war -- not a cool move :-)
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 5 November 2011 22:50 (fourteen years ago)
i am so not feeling this
so far the one thing i liked was some cheeky bit of business travolta did with a cigarette
― mark s, Saturday, 5 November 2011 22:52 (fourteen years ago)
there is lots to like, i mean what's not to like about the soaring strains of fauré's requiem accompanying some of rousseau's finest canoeing, gambolling, being, or jesus christ himself informing yr boy sean penn that he can see things, that the others have got it all wrong.....
― Nigel Farage is a fucking hero (nakhchivan), Saturday, 5 November 2011 22:55 (fourteen years ago)
most of the music is by this zimmer geezer though, and it's incredibly gluey and terrible
the landscape is pretty terrific: malick can do landscape, no question*, it's people that are a total mystery to him -- tho the decision to hardly ever use sunlight is amplifying my seasonal affective disorder, which i guess is my disgusting savagery not TM's weirdly stupid decision
i like the bit where the aged melanesian geezer walks unconcernedly through the battlelines, but it's shtick not insight
(bottle of red wine empty, shall i crack open my sister's rose for lols?
*esp.grass
― mark s, Saturday, 5 November 2011 23:04 (fourteen years ago)
ives' unanswered question duing the burning of the japanese camp (iirc) was pretty great too
― Nigel Farage is a fucking hero (nakhchivan), Saturday, 5 November 2011 23:08 (fourteen years ago)
doesn't malick sort of disrupt the people/landscape binary in favour of a deliberate (yes somewhat gloopy) panentheism, it's like an inversion of janco's arid scenarism in favour of a sort of lyrical fugue on the state of nature/state of grace, so you see people moving/acting/being in a landscape but don't parse them as individuals, they merely behave in accordance with some sort of obscure godly purpose
― Nigel Farage is a fucking hero (nakhchivan), Saturday, 5 November 2011 23:27 (fourteen years ago)
state of nature/state of grace <-- why are these the same thing? i think you're right that TM believes they are (and so do his narrators) but his actors don't (obviously, their profession depends on theor believing the opposite), but the disparity goes unaddressed
in practical terms this means that the energy massively sags as soon as anyone opens their mouths, and the topline actors are woefully misused and out-of=place (this is the real issue with the "cameo" controversy)
― mark s, Saturday, 5 November 2011 23:40 (fourteen years ago)
and zimmer's music isn't written by even an obscure god
― mark s, Saturday, 5 November 2011 23:44 (fourteen years ago)
they're not supposed to be the same thing, malick wishes that
jim caviezel = grace, trying to escape naturecrocodiles = straight nature, not even trying to be graceful
naturally it isn't entirely persuasive, but i like the thin red line a lot.....
― Nigel Farage is a fucking hero (nakhchivan), Saturday, 5 November 2011 23:49 (fourteen years ago)
he should have the entire movie with crocodiles, they are awesome and he understands them better than actors
― mark s, Saturday, 5 November 2011 23:58 (fourteen years ago)
afaik he just made a movie with, if not wall to crocodiles, then at least a lot of crocodilles, or a lot of their ancient predecessors
he also included sean penn though, whose relatively warm blood and faster metabolism somehow fails to lend him any greater motility than his reptilian counterparts
― Nigel Farage is a fucking hero (nakhchivan), Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:06 (fourteen years ago)
why oh why did he not direct jurassic park
― mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:09 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.badhaven.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/2160_JurassicPark1.jpg
Are you righteous? Kind? Does your confidence lie in this? Are you loved by all? Know that I was, too. Do you imagine your suffering will be any less because you loved goodness and truth?
― encarta it (Gukbe), Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:16 (fourteen years ago)
YES
― mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:21 (fourteen years ago)
man, really coming to think malick and george lucas are hands down ILE faves. i've seen nobody discussed more.
― NO NUTRITIONAL CONTENT (kelpolaris), Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:23 (fourteen years ago)
THEY ARE THE SAME PERSON
― mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:25 (fourteen years ago)
all malick voiceovers actually spoken by yoda
some people say the thin red line is scifi but it's obviously a western
― Nigel Farage is a fucking hero (nakhchivan), Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:29 (fourteen years ago)
really glad i didn't actually study heidegger under this guy as a student
― mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:41 (fourteen years ago)
if he'd done his job i'd be 100000000000 x more insufferable
― mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:44 (fourteen years ago)
spooky he just said "the new world"
― mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:49 (fourteen years ago)
has anyone ever made a joke in a malick script? it doesn't seem like a mode he'd like "get"
(ps i know why his wife left him) (not malick, i mean jesusboy)
― mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:53 (fourteen years ago)
the whisky has arrived in my brane
― mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:54 (fourteen years ago)
ok i promised myself i would watch this whole film a second time in full COME WHAT MAY but d00ds saw iii is on film4
― mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:58 (fourteen years ago)
there's a really subtle trypohobia subtext to TTRL that a sober me would be able to tease out (except a sober me wd not care)
― mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 01:03 (fourteen years ago)
*trypophobia
predator -- with a feel for the light and the leaves... stupid, i shd have got there quicker
― mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 01:22 (fourteen years ago)
why the FUCK is mark s discussing TTRL in a "DoH is full of gas" thread?
― Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 6 November 2011 12:29 (fourteen years ago)
i was drunkblogging! it seemed rude to pollute a serious proper grown-up discussion with MY intoxicated gas
― mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 12:39 (fourteen years ago)
there are plenty of funny lines in DoH & Badlands although perhaps not "jokes", as such. Amateurist linked to a malick scripted comedy on one of these threads a while back.
― jed_, Sunday, 6 November 2011 17:19 (fourteen years ago)
yeah, he wrote Deadhead Miles which is actually a pretty fucking funny, weird little movie. i liked it a lot. it's streaming on Netflix. Badlands is kind of a black comedy imo. tons of funny stuff in it.
plenty of great performances in his films too! "doesn't understand actors" is straight wrong.
― circa1916, Sunday, 6 November 2011 17:42 (fourteen years ago)
OK, I will look Deadhead Miles out. Badlands is indeed pretty funny, though I don't recall the characters joking with each other, which is what I meant (and I have lots of other problems with it). Haven't seen DoH for an age; will withhold comment till I've re-seen it. I would expect there to be good performances, he hires good actors and some of them know how to do their job whoever's directing them! One day when not drunk I will try and flesh out my "people are a mystery to him/understands crocodiles better than actors" thesis -- I am really trying to sound out what it is in his work that leaves me so unable to connect with it. Esp.when people I have time for think he's amazing.
― mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 17:59 (fourteen years ago)
I remember Ebert's review for TTRL when it came out, and his major complaint iirc was that the actors were making a different movie. From a lot of what I've read, this sounds about right. Gere talks about how beautiful and dense the DoH script was, and that they'd film these long scenes of dialogue, but when he saw the final cut he would reduce it to one line and just move on. See also Adrien Brody apparently being the star of TTRL and then, when he saw the premiere, found he was barely in it at all. Also see James Horner's comments re: The New World, where he complains how Malick handled the cutting of the love story and preventing it from becoming a "new Titanic".
― encarta it (Gukbe), Sunday, 6 November 2011 18:07 (fourteen years ago)
and Penn who said the script for the Tree of Life was the best he'd ever read and the end result was just something entirely different.
Also see James Horner's comments re: The New World, where he complains how Malick handled the cutting of the love story and preventing it from becoming a "new Titanic".
this was pretty lol in its cluelessness.
― circa1916, Sunday, 6 November 2011 18:18 (fourteen years ago)
The "actors making a different movie" thing about TTRL is pretty perceptive because it captures one thing I love about it. There's definitely the sense that a larger, more traditionally dramatic, story is going on that we only get passing glimpses at.
― ryan, Sunday, 6 November 2011 18:31 (fourteen years ago)
^^^ yeah, i think you're on to it there.
really wish we could see Malick's original scripts.
― circa1916, Sunday, 6 November 2011 18:40 (fourteen years ago)
i like deadhead miles more than two lane blacktop. though i probably prefer five easy pieces to deadhead miles. as far as existential road whatever movies go. actually harry & tonto might be the winner overall.
― scott seward, Sunday, 6 November 2011 18:44 (fourteen years ago)
and if i'm completely honest i probably prefer rafferty & the gold dust twins to deadhead miles as far as existential alan arkin road whatever movies go.
― scott seward, Sunday, 6 November 2011 18:47 (fourteen years ago)
watched this for the first time last night. so, so amazing, visually. loved the strange pace, the voiceover, brooke adams. and this:
when the airplane lands outside the house it is thrilling like no other superFX i can think of; what a freedom that airplane represents!
yes, most definitely this.
― a cake of three ingredients (stevie), Tuesday, 17 February 2015 15:36 (eleven years ago)
yeah, it's still my favorite malick film, just ahead of badlands
― contenderizer, Tuesday, 17 February 2015 15:40 (eleven years ago)
his most overrated. needs a fan cut with music and intertitles, no dialogue.
― touch of a love-starved cobra (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 17 February 2015 15:46 (eleven years ago)
watched this, badlands, ttrl and ToL in a run last year and loved them all p much unconditionally while agreeing with p much all criticisms, don't think i've ever felt quite so ilxy
― local eire man (darraghmac), Tuesday, 17 February 2015 15:49 (eleven years ago)
"The Tree of Life" is my favourite film of the last 5 years. "The New World" is worth watching too.
― tayto fan (Michael B), Tuesday, 17 February 2015 16:30 (eleven years ago)
If you can overcome your Farrell hate TNW is a decent movie.
― xelab, Tuesday, 17 February 2015 16:37 (eleven years ago)
I didnt get through it but it was def malick fatigue at that stage I'll prob revisit now I'm done with college again
― local eire man (darraghmac), Tuesday, 17 February 2015 17:28 (eleven years ago)
OK, this one is great. Saw it for the first time tonight in a big theater. Everything I disliked about Malick in all of his other films (the only ones I haven't seen are The New World and To the Wonder) cohered and worked wonderfully here: the sparseness, the golden hour obsession, nature and its scope, & finally characters I cared about. Really, really great film. Glad my friend insisted I check it out.
― flappy bird, Thursday, 5 October 2017 02:30 (eight years ago)
RIP Linda Manz
https://extratv.com/2020/08/14/days-of-heaven-star-linda-manz-dead-at-58/
― brooklyn suicide cult (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 15 August 2020 03:09 (five years ago)
Interview with Brooke Adamshttps://thefilmstage.com/brooke-adams-on-the-enduring-beauty-of-days-of-heaven-and-terrence-malicks-method/
― Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 10 December 2023 22:44 (two years ago)