Days of Heaven - let's hear it, Malick-haters!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Tell me why this movie isn't good. Classic for "i wanna be a dirt doctor" line - frankly ALL of the little girl's voice-over is brilliantly weird - and the amazing locust apocalypse scene still towers over all rural action sequences ever.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

New Richard-Gere-perfectly-cast-as-too-charming-for-his-own-good answers!

Tracer Hand, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

pah -

Sam Shepherd perfectly cast as defensive asshole country boy

when the airplane lands outside the house it is thrilling like no other superFX i can think of; what a freedom that airplane represents! movie is a sort of Story of America: these wide open expanses of possibility and freedom underwritten by servitude. the evil coughing landowner: he WILL die, won't he? and we the meek, shall inherit his stuff? the months roll by and he never fucking dies. so we have to kill him. but somehow, inevitably, he manages to destroy everything that would be valuable to us the moment before we do. and then they will hunt us down like dogs. pretty effing bleak, but at least that little girl's going to go somewhere. Days of Heaven II: Linda Buys a Fur

Tracer Hand, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I've tried to watch Days of Heaven twice, but it put me to sleep. I loved Badlands, so I'll probably give it another try someday. Maybe it's something that needs to be seen on the big screen.

Justyn Dillingham, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

music is beautiful, countryside is beautiful, gere is beautiful, shepard is beautiful, girl is beautiful, movie is boring and story is silly (get ovah yrselves all you beatiful ppl(

mark s, Monday, 18 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

aha the fish finally snapped :) okay YES the leads pretty awful people - she is happier (one suspects) with the violently shallow (and loaded) landowner than with her already vain and fight-prone boyfriend = she is shallowest of the all. But I love hearing our hero, the little girl, explain these sort of cumbersome adult movements to herself and to us.

No defense against its boringness or not. I kind of like boring movies maybe. Or at least slow ones. like REALLY slow. Jackie Brown is my favorite QT flick. but wait! - gleaned from imdb - tagline was "Your eyes... Your ears... Your senses... will be overwhelmed"!!!! trip out dude!

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 19 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

one year passes...
what about the 'thin red line'?

cozen¡ (Cozen), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Mark S kind of already said it, but "Days Of Heaven" is ALL surface in a way that few films actually are. It's an achievement of some kind, but not necessarily that great for an audience.

The Thin Red Line is great but not as deep as it thinks it is. And ultimately less than the sum of its parts.

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Love Days of Heaven. Its slow but fast. Just be thankful Travolta turned down the lead and it went to Gere.

Thin red line. hm. i like most of it but its killed by its Cameos. Seeing George Clooney two minutes from the end almost negated the rest of the film for me. Also Travolta is in it too and he's the most horrible actor ever.

jed (jed_e_3), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:11 (twenty-two years ago)

haha i don't understand this cameos line at all (which is used on the other thread i just revived accidentally). that's your problem, not the film's, surely?.

cozen¡ (Cozen), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:13 (twenty-two years ago)

No, he's right on that point - it's not an ensemble movie, it's an "isn't that...?" movie b/c it keeps on flashing new famous faces every ten minutes.

Girolamo Savonarola, Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:17 (twenty-two years ago)

no it isnt. Seeing George Clooney right at the end jerks you out of whatever state your in at the end of the movie. Its Malick's problem for not using someone else.

jed (jed_e_3), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:18 (twenty-two years ago)

xp

jed (jed_e_3), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:18 (twenty-two years ago)

i love days of heaven! mostly for the voice-over at the end!

(xp: jed is right)

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:19 (twenty-two years ago)

i would do 'isn't that?' with an 'ensemble movie' (um, whatever that is) and with 'thin red line' ("haha, look it's him from 'game on'!") - i don't think it's at all a blight on the film but makes me a feel momentarily silly but who cares.

amateurist has argued eloquently elsewhere (and in part me reviving these threads is an attempt to bait him out with any points he may have since developed his argument with) that the sound of the film, the 'through-composed' feel, the contrapunction, a medley of melodies whatever etc is u&k and fascinating.

cozen¡ (Cozen), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:25 (twenty-two years ago)

('ensemble movie' = something like that '8 women' film? or magnolia?)

cozen¡ (Cozen), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Its not a problem many directors would have to deal with - having all these famous people baying for bit parts in your film and, by all accounts, Malick is a bit of a recluse and therefore probably doesn't realise that everyone associates Cloney with ER (or did at the time the movie was released). But thats what casting directors are for. I Love most of the thin red though. I'm a sucker for that slow meditative style he has.

jed (jed_e_3), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:32 (twenty-two years ago)

i need to see this again, i would say it's my least favorite of malick's three films, but that's not saying much because the other two are among my favorite films in the world. most of all i just need to see it again, preferably on a big screen.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:33 (twenty-two years ago)

"boring" is the least persuasive criticism from my end, because every film i love seems to be described that way by somebody else.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:37 (twenty-two years ago)

"i like boring things"

jed (jed_e_3), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:39 (twenty-two years ago)

sometimes i say that as a kind of affront but i don't really mean it, because the things i love i don't find boring

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:43 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.sensesofcinema.com/contents/00/8/malick.html

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 3 January 2004 00:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Days Of Heaven is my favorite movie (actually it's tied with Over The Edge).

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 3 January 2004 01:48 (twenty-two years ago)

eight months pass...
what a strange, strange, strange film

(there are some pretty choppy moments. some seem perverse, others seem the result of the infamous studio pressures of which malick has complained.)

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 04:05 (twenty-one years ago)

what a great title sequence tho! (i love this movie)

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 04:08 (twenty-one years ago)

it IS strange, yes

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 04:09 (twenty-one years ago)

badlands has a really great title seq too, it's not so much a sequence but when "BADLANDS" comes up on the screen it's just perfect

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 04:10 (twenty-one years ago)

YES. if you ever get a chance to see fei mu's "spring in a small town" from 1948, that film has titles that introduce the characters that arrive on the screen at absolutely perfect moments--it reminded me of "badlands."

re. "days of heaven":


the rhythms are very strange. the sound design is strange. the pervasive quiet is very strange.

(i have to say i find the lead actress really unappealing. but the little girl is the strangest and most fascinating of all the film's elements.)

it's interesting to think of this film and "badlands" (and i guess "the thin red line") coming out the revisionist cycle of films that kicked off with "the chase" and "bonnie & clyde" etc. and they *are* revisionist readings of american history, albeit very unorthodox compared to the likes of "soldier blue" or even "heaven's gate."

sam shepard talks in this movie just like terrence malick!! it's weird.

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 04:14 (twenty-one years ago)

"we've never been this rich, a'ight?"

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 04:15 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah "BADLANDS" comes on the screen when she spots him as she's twirling her baton... like "here's the moment, there's no turning back now."

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 04:17 (twenty-one years ago)

"he said he was gonna buy me a fuh. i always wanted a fuh."

"where ya goin?"

"fuh a walk."

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 05:12 (twenty-one years ago)

gah, what an ending.

"i was hoping t'ing's'd work out fuh her, shewas a good friend a mine."

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 05:13 (twenty-one years ago)

trivia: the guy who produced this film was hollywood's biggest supporter of the black panthers once upon a time

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 05:14 (twenty-one years ago)

"we used to do things together. we used to have fun. we used to roam the streets, there was people sufferin the pain and hunger, some people their tongues were hanging out of their mouth...."

(i think these lines pretty well presage david gordon green's approach to dialogue)

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 05:24 (twenty-one years ago)

"i was hoping t'ing's'd work out fuh her, shewas a good friend a mine."
love that

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 06:21 (twenty-one years ago)

v. good article: http://www.sensesofcinema.com/contents/directors/02/malick.html

go to bed s1ocki

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 06:26 (twenty-one years ago)

i can't, i'm over-stimulated. what are you doing up?

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 06:27 (twenty-one years ago)

i just got this sinking feeling in my stomach when i realized that malick's next movie is pocahontas starring colin farrell.

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 06:32 (twenty-one years ago)

what are you doing up?

Soft Cell -- classic or dud?


i just got this sinking feeling in my stomach when i realized that malick's next movie is pocahontas starring colin farrell.

i have no fear

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Thursday, 9 September 2004 06:35 (twenty-one years ago)

The Thin Red Line is great but not as deep as it thinks it is.

Thin Red Line in one act:

CHUKKA CHUKKA CHUKKA

Oh God I'm shot!

CHUKKA CHUKKA CHUKKA

Oh God I'm dying!

CHUKKA CHUKKA CHUKKA

Oh God you're dying! I am sad!

CHUKKA CHUKKA CHUKKA

Oh God war is hell! How enlightening!

CHUKKA CHUKKA CHUKKA

Tonight at ten (kenan), Thursday, 9 September 2004 06:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, but it looks beautiful.

Days Of Heaven is incredible, and the train on the viaduct is one of my favourite shots ever.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Thursday, 9 September 2004 06:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Beautiful film.

EComplex (EComplex), Thursday, 9 September 2004 07:00 (twenty-one years ago)

The most puzzling thing is how it seems to be telling this incredibly involved and emoitionally complex story and yet the film seems to be doing nothing at all for most of its (pretty short?) length.

jed_ (jed), Thursday, 9 September 2004 11:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Scott Seward to thread!

Maria D. (Maria D.), Thursday, 9 September 2004 11:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm gonna start another thread instead.

scott seward (scott seward), Thursday, 9 September 2004 11:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I liked Days of Heaven, but I think I liked Badlands more.

n/a (Nick A.), Thursday, 9 September 2004 13:46 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.linkclub.or.jp/~hs0905/ri/%83%8A%83%93%83_%81E%83%7D%83%93%83c.jpg

Maria D. (Maria D.), Thursday, 9 September 2004 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm gonna start another thread instead.
-- scott seward (skotro...), September 9th, 2004.

why?

amateur!!st, Thursday, 9 September 2004 15:05 (twenty-one years ago)

He started the Linda Manz appreciation thread.

Maria D. (Maria D.), Thursday, 9 September 2004 15:41 (twenty-one years ago)

that girl is fascinating and scary

amateur!!st, Thursday, 9 September 2004 15:42 (twenty-one years ago)

only problem in thin read line is the flashbacks with the stupid stop frame effect, otherwise known as cheap ass family video strobe effect that renders all recollections cheap and silly looking. i hate it when movies use this. kubrick did it with the marine
sex scenes in eyes wide shut and it looked awful there too. this effect should be erased
from the conscious mind by aliens so that it can never be used or imagined again.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:08 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't recall him using the strobe effect at all. are you sure you are recalling correctly? the "flashabacks" that i remember were shot much like the rest of the film, albeit with even more elliptical editing.

i like how the "flashbacks" are ambiguous as to whether they are imaginative speculation, memory, or genuine flashbacks... also the part where witt's mother is dying and the camera tilts upward and the room has no roof

amateur!!st, Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:15 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah there is no strobe effect in it. there is an overlit quality to some of the flashbacks.

part of that flashback with the mother that always gets me: why do we see that (empty) birdcage again on Guadacanal?

ryan (ryan), Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:16 (twenty-one years ago)

hmm... maybe i remember incorrectly... if no strobe, definitely b&w though? right? i loved
this film when i saw it, but maybe i've done a shoddy remake in my mind since i last
saw it.
this happens to me often. the version of city of women that exists and the version of
city of women that i can recall are not the same film.
which is why i want to remake that film with rhys ifans in the marcello mastroiani role.
anyway...

firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:18 (twenty-one years ago)

formal rhymes? (sort of a sense-memory thing: the appearance of a sound or image from the flashback in another scene could make us recall the feelings from the flashback in the different context. eisenstein does some very elaborate sense-memory things in ivan the terrible. a less elaborate example would be the disturbing breathing at the end of both episodes of full metal jacket.)

we also hear the grandfather clock on the soundtrack several other times?

xpost

i don't recall b&w either... will have to watch again...

amateur!!st, Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:20 (twenty-one years ago)

playtime has many, many comic variations on the repeated motifs. for example, the middle-aged striptease which reappears in the background of the restaurant scene.

amateur!!st, Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:22 (twenty-one years ago)

i can't believe trl uses strobe effect! not to my recollection anyway. it is indeed the worst effect either, rivalled only by blurry fake slow mo

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:46 (twenty-one years ago)

does anyone know when cannes started using the days of heaven title music? (fuck that is great when it comes in in femme fatale)

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:48 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm ambivalent abt the morricone soundtrack to this film...

amateur!!st, Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:54 (twenty-one years ago)

really? i think it ranks with the mission in terms of almost cartoonishly pretty music

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:55 (twenty-one years ago)

that's my problem, i think. there's a broader range of nonsourced music in his other two films, which i think really enhances and enriches them.

(that's not to discount the cajun hoedown in DOH, or the leo kottke train theme...)

amateur!!st, Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)

i can't believe trl uses strobe effect!

It took me a second to realize you weren't talking about "Total Request Live."

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 9 September 2004 19:35 (twenty-one years ago)

well vittorio storaro does shoot that show

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 9 September 2004 20:04 (twenty-one years ago)

two weeks pass...
"days of heaven is all surface"

all films should be "all surface"

amateur!!st, Wednesday, 29 September 2004 06:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Watched it tonight... One of the most beautiful films I've ever seen.

Aaron W (Aaron W), Saturday, 2 October 2004 01:56 (twenty-one years ago)

check the linda manz appreciation thread for more

amateur!!!st (amateurist), Saturday, 2 October 2004 07:14 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
"i think i'm in love with you."

"what a nice thing to say."

amateur!!st, Tuesday, 9 November 2004 21:41 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
we just watched this in film class. i think it was pretty (definitely NOT the prettiest movie ever, maybe because nothing in it is ugly, stupid as that sounds) but i got tired of it always being in the late afternoon. the story was incredibly weak, the little girl was charming but unconvincing at times (too charming), i've just realized i don't think anyone in the movie had a name! i wasn't sure about the way-close-up nature shots (plants growing, locusts eating). didn't work for me. also i think the music was wrong for the movie. there were just things that didn't belong, too obsessed with prettiness. yes, all surface! no amateurist i don't think all films should be all surface but who am i to argue.

i would watch this again, if i had to, though.

caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 01:42 (twenty years ago)

caitlin otm

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 01:46 (twenty years ago)

oh wait, they did have names, there was abby and linda. also did the music sound exactly like in disney's beauty and the beast where the rose petals are falling in the jar? slightly different, but close.

caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 01:49 (twenty years ago)

you should watch it again

i got tired of it always being in the late afternoon

ha

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 02:02 (twenty years ago)

well i might have to watch it again at the end of the quarter, so yeah. i don't think it was terrible it just wasn't what i look for in a film, see

caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 02:04 (twenty years ago)

i admire the film but i don't like it

gear (gear), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 02:07 (twenty years ago)

It's not terrible. It's worth seeing. Maybe more than once (although I haven't). But it's overblown poesy. Attractively attired doggerel.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 02:08 (twenty years ago)

lots of people on this thread seem to think that the first purpose of visual beauty in a film is visual beauty, and that appreciating visual beauty should not be without guilt

i never studied movies in college, but i love this one

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 02:27 (twenty years ago)

I love lots of movies for their visual beauty -- I've defended 2046 against some of the same things Days of Heaven is being accused of here. But Wong's visual sense works on more levels for me than Malick's (except in Badlands).

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 02:33 (twenty years ago)

i love how amateurist called me out today for using "boring" in the exact same way he does up there

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 04:11 (twenty years ago)

I guess The Narcissism Of Small Differences is never more evident than on ILX film threads, Tracer.

k/l (Ken L), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 05:09 (twenty years ago)

(I stuck my neck in the controversy on the other thread and amst got me too)

k/l (Ken L), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 05:10 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...

i just watched this italian documentary about malick called "rosy fingered dawn" (ack) which was made just after the thin red line came out. i suppose it's pretty good but there's a hell of a lot of padding in it since they don't use much of the film footage (so you end up looking at shots of crazy people in new york streets, for some reason) and, obviously, there's no malick in it.

there's a few LOLs as jim caviezel and elias koteas strain for profundity in the interview sections but end up near enough making complete fools of themselves. i still like that koteas dude though. very interesting contributions from haskell wexler, arthur penn and jack fisk. worth seeing if you can get a hold of it.

jed_, Monday, 22 October 2007 02:26 (eighteen years ago)

not long now...

http://www.criterion.com/content/images/full_boxshot/409_box_348x490.jpg

I need a job to get money to buy this. And do other things, but buy this mostly.

Gukbe, Monday, 22 October 2007 03:00 (eighteen years ago)

to get a job*

my mind, i swear.

Gukbe, Monday, 22 October 2007 03:00 (eighteen years ago)

want

s1ocki, Monday, 22 October 2007 03:03 (eighteen years ago)

jim caviezel and elias koteas strain for profundity in the interview sections but end up near enough making complete fools of themselves

"straining for profundity" kind of sums up my feelings about everything malick's done post-badlands. what i'll say for days of heaven is that it's somewhat better than the other two overblown junkers he's deigned to twiddle with since.

jesus, imdb says his next movie is called "tree of life." kill me now.

tipsy mothra, Monday, 22 October 2007 04:30 (eighteen years ago)

three years pass...

ha ^

sweatpants life trajectory (schlump), Friday, 19 August 2011 22:12 (fourteen years ago)

two months pass...

i find myself watching "the thin red line" for the second evening in row, except this time i am drunk

mark s, Saturday, 5 November 2011 22:35 (fourteen years ago)

maybe this time i will in fact realise that war is bad mkay

mark s, Saturday, 5 November 2011 22:37 (fourteen years ago)

i turned all the lights off so cannot* be distracted by shallow trivia

*certainly untrue

mark s, Saturday, 5 November 2011 22:39 (fourteen years ago)

sorry but i think you're being disrepectful to this meditation on the brutality of war -- not a cool move :-)

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 5 November 2011 22:50 (fourteen years ago)

i am so not feeling this

so far the one thing i liked was some cheeky bit of business travolta did with a cigarette

mark s, Saturday, 5 November 2011 22:52 (fourteen years ago)

there is lots to like, i mean what's not to like about the soaring strains of fauré's requiem accompanying some of rousseau's finest canoeing, gambolling, being, or jesus christ himself informing yr boy sean penn that he can see things, that the others have got it all wrong.....

Nigel Farage is a fucking hero (nakhchivan), Saturday, 5 November 2011 22:55 (fourteen years ago)

most of the music is by this zimmer geezer though, and it's incredibly gluey and terrible

the landscape is pretty terrific: malick can do landscape, no question*, it's people that are a total mystery to him -- tho the decision to hardly ever use sunlight is amplifying my seasonal affective disorder, which i guess is my disgusting savagery not TM's weirdly stupid decision

i like the bit where the aged melanesian geezer walks unconcernedly through the battlelines, but it's shtick not insight

(bottle of red wine empty, shall i crack open my sister's rose for lols?

*esp.grass

mark s, Saturday, 5 November 2011 23:04 (fourteen years ago)

ives' unanswered question duing the burning of the japanese camp (iirc) was pretty great too

Nigel Farage is a fucking hero (nakhchivan), Saturday, 5 November 2011 23:08 (fourteen years ago)

doesn't malick sort of disrupt the people/landscape binary in favour of a deliberate (yes somewhat gloopy) panentheism, it's like an inversion of janco's arid scenarism in favour of a sort of lyrical fugue on the state of nature/state of grace, so you see people moving/acting/being in a landscape but don't parse them as individuals, they merely behave in accordance with some sort of obscure godly purpose

Nigel Farage is a fucking hero (nakhchivan), Saturday, 5 November 2011 23:27 (fourteen years ago)

state of nature/state of grace <-- why are these the same thing? i think you're right that TM believes they are (and so do his narrators) but his actors don't (obviously, their profession depends on theor believing the opposite), but the disparity goes unaddressed

in practical terms this means that the energy massively sags as soon as anyone opens their mouths, and the topline actors are woefully misused and out-of=place (this is the real issue with the "cameo" controversy)

mark s, Saturday, 5 November 2011 23:40 (fourteen years ago)

and zimmer's music isn't written by even an obscure god

mark s, Saturday, 5 November 2011 23:44 (fourteen years ago)

they're not supposed to be the same thing, malick wishes that

jim caviezel = grace, trying to escape nature
crocodiles = straight nature, not even trying to be graceful

naturally it isn't entirely persuasive, but i like the thin red line a lot.....

Nigel Farage is a fucking hero (nakhchivan), Saturday, 5 November 2011 23:49 (fourteen years ago)

he should have the entire movie with crocodiles, they are awesome and he understands them better than actors

mark s, Saturday, 5 November 2011 23:58 (fourteen years ago)

afaik he just made a movie with, if not wall to crocodiles, then at least a lot of crocodilles, or a lot of their ancient predecessors

he also included sean penn though, whose relatively warm blood and faster metabolism somehow fails to lend him any greater motility than his reptilian counterparts

Nigel Farage is a fucking hero (nakhchivan), Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:06 (fourteen years ago)

why oh why did he not direct jurassic park

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:09 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.badhaven.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/2160_JurassicPark1.jpg

Are you righteous? Kind? Does your confidence lie in this? Are you loved by all? Know that I was, too. Do you imagine your suffering will be any less because you loved goodness and truth?

encarta it (Gukbe), Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:16 (fourteen years ago)

YES

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:21 (fourteen years ago)

man, really coming to think malick and george lucas are hands down ILE faves. i've seen nobody discussed more.

NO NUTRITIONAL CONTENT (kelpolaris), Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:23 (fourteen years ago)

THEY ARE THE SAME PERSON

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:25 (fourteen years ago)

all malick voiceovers actually spoken by yoda

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:25 (fourteen years ago)

some people say the thin red line is scifi but it's obviously a western

Nigel Farage is a fucking hero (nakhchivan), Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:29 (fourteen years ago)

really glad i didn't actually study heidegger under this guy as a student

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:41 (fourteen years ago)

if he'd done his job i'd be 100000000000 x more insufferable

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:44 (fourteen years ago)

spooky he just said "the new world"

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:49 (fourteen years ago)

has anyone ever made a joke in a malick script? it doesn't seem like a mode he'd like "get"

(ps i know why his wife left him) (not malick, i mean jesusboy)

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:53 (fourteen years ago)

the whisky has arrived in my brane

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:54 (fourteen years ago)

ok i promised myself i would watch this whole film a second time in full COME WHAT MAY but d00ds saw iii is on film4

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 00:58 (fourteen years ago)

there's a really subtle trypohobia subtext to TTRL that a sober me would be able to tease out (except a sober me wd not care)

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 01:03 (fourteen years ago)

*trypophobia

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 01:03 (fourteen years ago)

predator -- with a feel for the light and the leaves... stupid, i shd have got there quicker

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 01:22 (fourteen years ago)

why the FUCK is mark s discussing TTRL in a "DoH is full of gas" thread?

Dr Morbois de Bologne (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 6 November 2011 12:29 (fourteen years ago)

i was drunkblogging! it seemed rude to pollute a serious proper grown-up discussion with MY intoxicated gas

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 12:39 (fourteen years ago)

there are plenty of funny lines in DoH & Badlands although perhaps not "jokes", as such. Amateurist linked to a malick scripted comedy on one of these threads a while back.

jed_, Sunday, 6 November 2011 17:19 (fourteen years ago)

yeah, he wrote Deadhead Miles which is actually a pretty fucking funny, weird little movie. i liked it a lot. it's streaming on Netflix. Badlands is kind of a black comedy imo. tons of funny stuff in it.

plenty of great performances in his films too! "doesn't understand actors" is straight wrong.

circa1916, Sunday, 6 November 2011 17:42 (fourteen years ago)

OK, I will look Deadhead Miles out. Badlands is indeed pretty funny, though I don't recall the characters joking with each other, which is what I meant (and I have lots of other problems with it). Haven't seen DoH for an age; will withhold comment till I've re-seen it. I would expect there to be good performances, he hires good actors and some of them know how to do their job whoever's directing them! One day when not drunk I will try and flesh out my "people are a mystery to him/understands crocodiles better than actors" thesis -- I am really trying to sound out what it is in his work that leaves me so unable to connect with it. Esp.when people I have time for think he's amazing.

mark s, Sunday, 6 November 2011 17:59 (fourteen years ago)

I remember Ebert's review for TTRL when it came out, and his major complaint iirc was that the actors were making a different movie. From a lot of what I've read, this sounds about right. Gere talks about how beautiful and dense the DoH script was, and that they'd film these long scenes of dialogue, but when he saw the final cut he would reduce it to one line and just move on. See also Adrien Brody apparently being the star of TTRL and then, when he saw the premiere, found he was barely in it at all. Also see James Horner's comments re: The New World, where he complains how Malick handled the cutting of the love story and preventing it from becoming a "new Titanic".

encarta it (Gukbe), Sunday, 6 November 2011 18:07 (fourteen years ago)

and Penn who said the script for the Tree of Life was the best he'd ever read and the end result was just something entirely different.

Also see James Horner's comments re: The New World, where he complains how Malick handled the cutting of the love story and preventing it from becoming a "new Titanic".

this was pretty lol in its cluelessness.

circa1916, Sunday, 6 November 2011 18:18 (fourteen years ago)

The "actors making a different movie" thing about TTRL is pretty perceptive because it captures one thing I love about it. There's definitely the sense that a larger, more traditionally dramatic, story is going on that we only get passing glimpses at.

ryan, Sunday, 6 November 2011 18:31 (fourteen years ago)

^^^ yeah, i think you're on to it there.

really wish we could see Malick's original scripts.

circa1916, Sunday, 6 November 2011 18:40 (fourteen years ago)

i like deadhead miles more than two lane blacktop. though i probably prefer five easy pieces to deadhead miles. as far as existential road whatever movies go. actually harry & tonto might be the winner overall.

scott seward, Sunday, 6 November 2011 18:44 (fourteen years ago)

and if i'm completely honest i probably prefer rafferty & the gold dust twins to deadhead miles as far as existential alan arkin road whatever movies go.

scott seward, Sunday, 6 November 2011 18:47 (fourteen years ago)

three years pass...

watched this for the first time last night. so, so amazing, visually. loved the strange pace, the voiceover, brooke adams. and this:

when the airplane lands outside the house it is thrilling like no other superFX i can think of; what a freedom that airplane represents!

yes, most definitely this.

a cake of three ingredients (stevie), Tuesday, 17 February 2015 15:36 (eleven years ago)

yeah, it's still my favorite malick film, just ahead of badlands

contenderizer, Tuesday, 17 February 2015 15:40 (eleven years ago)

his most overrated. needs a fan cut with music and intertitles, no dialogue.

touch of a love-starved cobra (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 17 February 2015 15:46 (eleven years ago)

watched this, badlands, ttrl and ToL in a run last year and loved them all p much unconditionally while agreeing with p much all criticisms, don't think i've ever felt quite so ilxy

local eire man (darraghmac), Tuesday, 17 February 2015 15:49 (eleven years ago)

"The Tree of Life" is my favourite film of the last 5 years. "The New World" is worth watching too.

tayto fan (Michael B), Tuesday, 17 February 2015 16:30 (eleven years ago)

If you can overcome your Farrell hate TNW is a decent movie.

xelab, Tuesday, 17 February 2015 16:37 (eleven years ago)

I didnt get through it but it was def malick fatigue at that stage I'll prob revisit now I'm done with college again

local eire man (darraghmac), Tuesday, 17 February 2015 17:28 (eleven years ago)

two years pass...

OK, this one is great. Saw it for the first time tonight in a big theater. Everything I disliked about Malick in all of his other films (the only ones I haven't seen are The New World and To the Wonder) cohered and worked wonderfully here: the sparseness, the golden hour obsession, nature and its scope, & finally characters I cared about. Really, really great film. Glad my friend insisted I check it out.

flappy bird, Thursday, 5 October 2017 02:30 (eight years ago)

two years pass...

RIP Linda Manz

https://extratv.com/2020/08/14/days-of-heaven-star-linda-manz-dead-at-58/

brooklyn suicide cult (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 15 August 2020 03:09 (five years ago)

three years pass...

Interview with Brooke Adams
https://thefilmstage.com/brooke-adams-on-the-enduring-beauty-of-days-of-heaven-and-terrence-malicks-method/

Elvis Telecom, Sunday, 10 December 2023 22:44 (two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.