http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/16899713/detail.html
If you really want to depress yourself, google "kitten in microwave".
― HI DERE, Thursday, 17 July 2008 03:18 (seventeen years ago)
:(
― Bo Jackson Overdrive, Thursday, 17 July 2008 03:19 (seventeen years ago)
no thanks dude
― elan, Thursday, 17 July 2008 03:24 (seventeen years ago)
"don't nuke me, bro"
― velko, Thursday, 17 July 2008 04:02 (seventeen years ago)
Unbelievably, I used to work with a guy who claims he "dried off" his cat in the microwave once. It wasnt harmed... SO HE SAYS. He was a perfectly nice normal guy, and I'm not at all sure his story was true... which actually makes claiming it so o_0 I don't know what to think.
― Trayce, Thursday, 17 July 2008 04:07 (seventeen years ago)
did you guys see about the two washington nats fans who got themselves killed standing up on a double decker bus ride under a bridge?
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 17 July 2008 04:18 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/13/AR2008071301799.html
― El Tomboto, Thursday, 17 July 2008 04:21 (seventeen years ago)
wow that linked article has the greatest worst headline ever
― BLACK BEYONCE, Thursday, 17 July 2008 05:59 (seventeen years ago)
These are not people who go home to their families or go to church picnics," he said.
― rockapads, Thursday, 17 July 2008 06:11 (seventeen years ago)
"When you think about it, who is throwing a cat in the microwave, or setting an animal on fire or cutting off the ear of a dog. These are not people who go home to their families or go to church picnics," he said.
..except that the meat industry does similarly torturous things to millions of animals every day so that those people on their church picnics can get their beef and stuff.
― Tuomas, Thursday, 17 July 2008 12:21 (seventeen years ago)
But hey, those animals aren't cute kittens, so who cares?
― Tuomas, Thursday, 17 July 2008 12:22 (seventeen years ago)
Well while I get yr point, I hardly think the beef industry are microwaving cows for our dining enjoyment.
― Trayce, Thursday, 17 July 2008 12:44 (seventeen years ago)
No, but the meat industry makes animals live in such small spaces that they are in constant agony, have regular pains, their feet and other bones often get broken but no one tends to them, they succumb to cannibalism and other behavioural disorders due to stress and not being able to move properly, etc. At least the microwaving only lasted for a brief time and apparently didn't leave any permanent damage.
― Tuomas, Thursday, 17 July 2008 12:51 (seventeen years ago)
girl I went to school with said her sister put a cat in a microwave when she was drunk once--didn't survive.
guy who used to hit on my friend at the movie theater she worked in is going to jail for tying up, torturing, then finally using a bow and arrow to kill his girlfriend's dog.
good morning!
― RabiesAngentleman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 12:53 (seventeen years ago)
It's not like people're always human
― Niles Caulder, Thursday, 17 July 2008 12:55 (seventeen years ago)
Tuomas I've been on several farms with cattle and pigs and have never seen any of that. Maybe it happens else where but... sorry I'm getting defensive; I've been lectured a few times after revealing that some of my family farms by people who refuse to believe that farm animals have ever been treated in any way other than unspeakably inhumane. Am I meeting the wrong people?
― RabiesAngentleman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 12:57 (seventeen years ago)
key phrase there is 'family farm' rabies
if anyone wants to say peta et al are bsing about what goes on in factory farms im all ears
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:00 (seventeen years ago)
anyone who lectures you about being a farmer/being related to farmers is a guaranteed insufferable dbag btw
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:01 (seventeen years ago)
I'm not saying it happens on every small farm, but on the bigger farms it's very common, I've seen lots of documentaries about it. Chicken are usually treated worst, cows might have it better.
(xx-post)
― Tuomas, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:02 (seventeen years ago)
I've certainly seen both kinds of farming in the UK. I don't think it's as bad here as it was although no doubt I can be shown to be totally wrong.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:04 (seventeen years ago)
I would say that mistreatment of farm animals is more prevalent than mistreatment of kittens though.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:05 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, they certainly don't have shrinkwrapped kittens on the shelves in Tesco.
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:06 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, hence "I'm sure it goes on else where". I'm just being butthurt over something not actually applicable to what we're talking about that happened a handful of times like six years ago when I was in college, carry on...
(tuomas totally otm about chickens, even on some family farms, actually)
― RabiesAngentleman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:07 (seventeen years ago)
first part was like an xxxxpost or something btw
http://www.oikeuttaelaimille.net/ttnet/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=154&Itemid=174
Here's a site with pictures and videos of Finnish chicken and pig farms. Now, Finland is not a big producer of animal products, and the laws regarding the treatment of animals are relatively strict here, so I doubt things are much better in other countries.
― Tuomas, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:11 (seventeen years ago)
tuomas said 'the meat industry' not 'all farms'
― max, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:11 (seventeen years ago)
Battery hen farming is really quite vile. I always buy free-range eggs.
― Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:14 (seventeen years ago)
yeah we cleared that up (xp)
― RabiesAngentleman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:15 (seventeen years ago)
Free-range eggs or not, chick production is always pretty grim at hatcheries though isn't it? It's normally straight into the crusher for the males right?
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:17 (seventeen years ago)
what, male chickens don't taste good?
I never thought about that.
― Mark G, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:19 (seventeen years ago)
Um, male chickens don't lay eggs. Egg-laying breeds aren't good for meat production, they don't bulk up like yer broiler chickens, so male layers aren't of much economic use to anyone. So, it's the crusher basically.
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:21 (seventeen years ago)
At least the microwaving only lasted for a brief time and apparently didn't leave any permanent damage.
No permanent damage other than dime-sized holes burned through his ear and left paw, plus so much damage to his tail that it will likely have to be amputated, you mean?
(this was on the local news; googling to find a link to the story revealed that there's a dude in the Boston area getting his jollies off of microwaving kittens almost to death)
― HI DERE, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:25 (seventeen years ago)
GIS "male chicks hatchery" and you'll get the general idea :( (xpost)
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:26 (seventeen years ago)
And I don't really want to get into the cruelty to animals on farms debate because I'd be arguing against a position I'm mostly sympathetic towards, but I personally have less of a problem with the way some animals are kept on farms because I eat them.
― HI DERE, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:26 (seventeen years ago)
^^truth, there is a big difference between hurting someone to get off & hurting someone for a reason
this is why dahmer is one of the more sympathetic serial killers of all time
(thats a corny joke btw)
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:29 (seventeen years ago)
Well, obviously I symphatize with the kitten, but I just thought it was hypocritical for whoever was interviewed in the article to say that people who mistreat animals are weird and not normal, when animal mistreatment is a basic tenet of most societies.
(xxx-post)
― Tuomas, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:29 (seventeen years ago)
So, meat production chickens could be male or female?
― Mark G, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:29 (seventeen years ago)
tuomas thats bullshit though, unless you think anyone who eats meat is a sadist
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:30 (seventeen years ago)
In the Philippines they eat one day old chicks... http://my_sarisari_store.typepad.com/my_sarisari_store/street_food/page/2/
Which seems better really.
Also it's not really a crusher (in the UK anyway) it's a macerator. Pretty awful I guess but also pretty instant.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:32 (seventeen years ago)
And to answer MarkG - Capons!
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:34 (seventeen years ago)
better kittens than babies, I guess, which is what people were doing earlier this year
― akm, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:38 (seventeen years ago)
People were microwaving babies?
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:40 (seventeen years ago)
yeah, dan's started a LOT of threads whose titles are basically "WTF HUMANITY", i think that was one of em
― Just got offed, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:40 (seventeen years ago)
No, thinking about it, I suppose they'd be mostly female too. Too much conflict in the flock/cage group if there were males. Dunno the definitive answer there though.
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:44 (seventeen years ago)
Oh yeah, that guy who told him the devil made him do it, that was a couple of years ago though? It's not a regular occurance is it? Please tell me it's not.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:45 (seventeen years ago)
I think a woman did it earlier this year cos she couldn't handle looking after it... put it in, turned it on, left the house.
― Niles Caulder, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:46 (seventeen years ago)
is that really less hassle than putting up an adoption flier? I mean the smell for a start...
― RabiesAngentleman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:48 (seventeen years ago)
Sorry that was to Louis.
Is no-one going to make an eating cocks joke? Really, standards are slipping...
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:49 (seventeen years ago)
tuomas it's that sort of overdramatic, illogical appraisal of the issue that causes animal rights people to turn off people who otherwise are pretty sympathetic to their basic agenda.
― Granny Dainger, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:53 (seventeen years ago)
im not really sure why every is up in tuomas's face when hes making a pretty valid point about a specific quote in the article
― max, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:54 (seventeen years ago)
hes not indicting you all for genocide, hes saying that this quote: "When you think about it, who is throwing a cat in the microwave, or setting an animal on fire or cutting off the ear of a dog. These are not people who go home to their families or go to church picnics" is hypocritical
― max, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:55 (seventeen years ago)
what a challop, has this dude never heard of dennis rader??
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:56 (seventeen years ago)
"When you think about it"
― RabiesAngentleman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:58 (seventeen years ago)
how is it hypocritical?
― Granny Dainger, Thursday, 17 July 2008 13:59 (seventeen years ago)
ugh sorry i even posted on this thread
― max, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:01 (seventeen years ago)
No, I think you're right. I'm sure most of us are hypocritical about this. I certainly feel more angry about pet abuse than farm animal abuse, which I pretend doesn't happen as I tuck into a kebab.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:04 (seventeen years ago)
I think I am, too, but I don't think that statement or the sentiment behind it is.
― Granny Dainger, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:08 (seventeen years ago)
you pay for meat, youre no better than people like me who pay to watch fat chicks asphyxiate cats for fetish purposes
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:12 (seventeen years ago)
seriously. everyone loves cat-sausage, but no one wants to know how it's made.
― The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:16 (seventeen years ago)
yeah i just sliced my dogs ear off for fun, but isnt that a mcdonalds bag i see in your passenger seat? whats in there? a BURGER?? hmm? dont judge me
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:17 (seventeen years ago)
What Tuomas is getting at is what Gary Francione calls our 'moral schizophrenia' regarding the treatment of animals. We're outraged at people torturing dogs or cats for fun, but we don't think twice about eating meat, which might involve just as much suffering and our basic justification doing that is also basically enjoyment. How are the two things different from the POV of the animal in question?
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:20 (seventeen years ago)
im all for vegetarianism/veganism & i totally get the theory & why its ethically sound etc, but that quote is ON THE FUCKING MONEY
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:21 (seventeen years ago)
believe it or not, animals aren't capable of comprehending the subtleties of human morality.
― Granny Dainger, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:25 (seventeen years ago)
ppl who piss me off the most are the ones who are all HOW CAN YOU EAT HORSE/DEER, THAT IS BARBARIC, THEY ARE SUCH BEAUTIFUL ANIMALS
― Just got offed, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:25 (seventeen years ago)
show me the horse deer!
― Mark G, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:26 (seventeen years ago)
Need to dig up that story about Mike Huckabee's kid hanging a dog. At church camp.
― Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:28 (seventeen years ago)
http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/290/4hiys5fdr4.jpg
Guten tag, I'm Philipp Lahm, and this is my lunch.
― Just got offed, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:29 (seventeen years ago)
horses are way too domestic for me to be comfortable w/ people who eat them, i dont see how t hey compare to deer really
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:30 (seventeen years ago)
I'm not arguing that they do, I'm arguing that the level of suffering is the same. What's your moral justification for one animal use and not the other?
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:30 (seventeen years ago)
dude, some people are sick in the head in a real bad way and some people aren't
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:31 (seventeen years ago)
That's true, but not morally relevant.
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:33 (seventeen years ago)
wtffffffffff
no ones yet argued that eating meat isnt immoral on some level - i eat meat all the time but i think it is & admire those who dont & i am definitely a hypocrite but that quote is not hypocritical
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:35 (seventeen years ago)
torturing dogs or cats for fun, but we don't think twice about eating meat
are these the 2 animal uses you're referring to? isn't the difference between the two obvious? Animals eating other animals is a fact of life. (Yes animals raised for food often live in deplorable conditions and I am all for buying meat from reputable independent farms who treat their animals as humanely as possible, and think there should be more regulation of large, industry-scale farms). Equating this to humans torturing animals solely for their own amusement is a bit ridiculous and serves to weaken the validity of the argument against eating meat.
― Granny Dainger, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:36 (seventeen years ago)
animal torture is also a fact of life--have you ever seen a cat play with a mouse?
― max, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:39 (seventeen years ago)
http://pandadan.files.wordpress.com/2007/05/idiot-41423.jpg
― Mark G, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:39 (seventeen years ago)
(I don't think anyone's an idiot, I just had a piclink to use)
-- Granny Dainger
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:40 (seventeen years ago)
not to mention the fact that we can sustain ourselves quite well--maybe even healthier--without eating meat--at some point killing animals for meat is 'for fun'
― max, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:40 (seventeen years ago)
the line between "torturing animals for fun" and "killing animals for meat" is not as big and bold as wed like it to be
― max, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:41 (seventeen years ago)
you think a cat is consciously torturing that mouse in the same way that a human sadist would?
― Granny Dainger, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:41 (seventeen years ago)
im not sure that intent matters
― max, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:42 (seventeen years ago)
YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDSING ME
max you are not saying anything that all of us dont already understand! youre the one who fails to understand sadistic/sociopathic behavior as far as i can tell
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:42 (seventeen years ago)
i mean, if youre going to say "animals eating animals is a way of life," intent sort of goes out the window doesnt it
― max, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:43 (seventeen years ago)
that question in mark g's pic is kinda psychologically tricky really, you instinctively want to go w/ elephant
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:44 (seventeen years ago)
Animals eating other animals is a fact of life
Where do you stand on eating your own babies?
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:49 (seventeen years ago)
This thread has officially started to suck
― Bill Magill, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:50 (seventeen years ago)
oh well since the two are perfectly equatable, i'm totally for eating your own babies.
― Granny Dainger, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:50 (seventeen years ago)
I think unless you're prepared to eat your own husband the moment he's finished having sex with you, you have no right to condemn others for eating McDonald's. Once again it's one standard for humans and another for spiders. Get a grip, Congress!
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:51 (seventeen years ago)
you'd do it if you're hungry enough xxxpost
― ken c, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:51 (seventeen years ago)
wtf is wrong with you people
(first)
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:53 (seventeen years ago)
dammit, deeznuts, that was my next post
― HI DERE, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:53 (seventeen years ago)
Is it bad for a baby to see itself being eaten Y/N
― DJ Mencap, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:56 (seventeen years ago)
hey somebody did something we can all agree is fucking loathsome, let's take this opportunity to have pointless arguments
― J0hn D., Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:57 (seventeen years ago)
T/S: babies seeing itself eaten vs wanking in front of babies
― ken c, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:58 (seventeen years ago)
ILE in a nutshell
― HI DERE, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:59 (seventeen years ago)
and I say this as an insufferable ethically-motivated vegetarian who will happily lecture that ass on why YOU'RE WRONG at the earliest possible opportunity
x-post vs. yelling at babies from the windows of passing cars
― J0hn D., Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:59 (seventeen years ago)
which I think I'll go do right now
"fuck you, Mr. Baby., don't you know there are animals suffering even as we speaking? hypocrite infants, get bent"
― J0hn D., Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:00 (seventeen years ago)
babies pre-salting fries vs. babies reading while walking
― max, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:00 (seventeen years ago)
"we speaking" one of my finer rhetorical moments there
babies eating babies
― Granny Dainger, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:00 (seventeen years ago)
vs. scraping foetus off the wheel
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:01 (seventeen years ago)
baby on pizza
― Just got offed, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:02 (seventeen years ago)
oh well since the two are perfectly equatable, i'm totally for eating your own babies
Anyhow, all I was getting at is that the 'it's a fact of life' argument is sort of a silly business.
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:03 (seventeen years ago)
...what with evolution and all
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:04 (seventeen years ago)
-- Bill Magill, Thursday, 17 July 2008 14:50 (4 minutes ago) Link
it's starting to get better again...oh no wait
― RabiesAngentleman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:05 (seventeen years ago)
Eat a bag of toddlers.
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:06 (seventeen years ago)
does anyone know that joke about a guy who thought he was eating tomatoes except they were actually babies? i got told that when i was like 5 by a friend & thought it was very funny
there was also a great joke from that same period about a kid named 'butt itches'
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:07 (seventeen years ago)
-- NickB, Thursday, July 17, 2008 10:06 AM (Thursday, July 17, 2008 10:06 AM) Bookmark Link
http://www.arbetaren.se/klimatblogg/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/theroad.jpg
― chicago kevin, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:08 (seventeen years ago)
babies masturbating on pizzas that don't tip their waiters
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:08 (seventeen years ago)
What the fuck is this thread about?
― The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:08 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.curiousexpeditions.org/Rubens_saturn.jpg
― RabiesAngentleman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:08 (seventeen years ago)
it ended with him getting shot by the cops because no one believed his name was 'butt itches' & the punchline was his mother going 'oh my poor butt itches!' at his funeral & the person next to her said 'if your butt itches, then why don't you scratch it?'
great joke
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:09 (seventeen years ago)
that rubens painting is so fucking awesome
― J0hn D., Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:10 (seventeen years ago)
Why is there a plane coming into land right behind that guy though?
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:12 (seventeen years ago)
RUBENS KNEW
― J0hn D., Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:12 (seventeen years ago)
its not cmoing into land, its headed straight for the second tower of the world trade center, thats why all the black smoke
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:14 (seventeen years ago)
lolz xp
― RabiesAngentleman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:14 (seventeen years ago)
'One minute to live, what the hell, let's eat a baby'
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:15 (seventeen years ago)
"so what's she like?"
"she's... rubenesque"
"a little chubby huh"
"no she sucks baby entrails out through their chests"
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:17 (seventeen years ago)
^fact of life
― Granny Dainger, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:19 (seventeen years ago)
reubens v. goya
http://data.quenta.org/goya-saturn-son.jpg
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:20 (seventeen years ago)
I think I still prefer the Goya for its "Hi! I'm fucking crazy!" look on Saturn's face.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/77/Saturno_devorando_a_sus_hijos.jpg/300px-Saturno_devorando_a_sus_hijos.jpg
OM NOM NOM
shit xp
― Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:20 (seventeen years ago)
Goya was a motherfucker with some dark secrets
― HI DERE, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:21 (seventeen years ago)
Like any overeager child on Easter morning, he ate the head first. Saturn, not Goya.
― Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:21 (seventeen years ago)
goya walks that
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:21 (seventeen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Francisco_Goya&action=submit
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:22 (seventeen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Goya
I gotta go with the Rubens depiction
― RabiesAngentleman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:24 (seventeen years ago)
I kinda with Matthias Grunewald had a version.
this thread is going well.
― The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:25 (seventeen years ago)
yeah was just thinkin that
― RabiesAngentleman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:25 (seventeen years ago)
who was the other crazy spanish motherfucker, from like the 1500s?
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:25 (seventeen years ago)
El Greco? (yes, he's not Spanish)
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:30 (seventeen years ago)
must be thinking of this guy, deez http://people.csail.mit.edu/paulfitz/spanish/tt16.jpg
― Granny Dainger, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:30 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.artezine.com/jsc_el_greco_saint_john_t.jpg
http://www.cybergrain.com/tech/hdr/images1/elgreco.jpg
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:35 (seventeen years ago)
it's impossible not to respond to the Goya one, love it too & it is up on some slasher movie/thehorrorthehorror shit, but Rubens one is deeper because in Goya a crazed cartoon saturn is eating a decapitated model. in the Rubens one, a man is eating a live baby.
― J0hn D., Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:36 (seventeen years ago)
yeahhhh el greco! thx nick b
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:37 (seventeen years ago)
and like, Saturn didn't eat his children 'cause he'd gone insane. it was a very intentional act, which you can see in the Rubens one: "gotta eat this baby so I don't get knocked off the throne. man's gotta do what a man's gotta do!" evil rather than I AM CRAZED, MUST EAT OWN CHILD
― J0hn D., Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:37 (seventeen years ago)
I suspect the point is rather that anyone willing to do such a thing to stay in power is actually crazed, no matter how matter of fact they seem.
― Laurel, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:43 (seventeen years ago)
oh yeah I can dig that but I like how Rubens is like "the man doing this still looks like a man, possibly like a man who craves power above all else - so, if you're looking for such a man, please note that his face may look kind of familiar"
but like I say I mean c'mon I'm a goth, the Goya one also fucking rules
― J0hn D., Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:47 (seventeen years ago)
yeah its not just that hes doing it cuz hes crazy theres a lot of feeling in those eyes xp
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:47 (seventeen years ago)
rubens is definitely creepier
― deeznuts, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:48 (seventeen years ago)
Laurel, eating potential usurpers of the throne is just a fact of life.
― Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:49 (seventeen years ago)
You take the good, you take the bad, you eat them all and then you have...
― HI DERE, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:53 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKXMyOiYL1c
― NickB, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:53 (seventeen years ago)
Cronos devouring his children poll, plz.
― Oilyrags, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:55 (seventeen years ago)
Getting back to the earlier stuff, top three panels of today's Achewood strangely appropriate.
― Pancakes Hackman, Thursday, 17 July 2008 15:59 (seventeen years ago)
Mob beat up two police officers after being asked to pick up litter.
There has to be something else to this story.
― Ned Trifle II, Friday, 18 July 2008 10:14 (seventeen years ago)
Another great advertisement for Croydon.
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 18 July 2008 10:19 (seventeen years ago)
All the stories talk about teenagers but the police have arrested two 30+ blokes as well?
― Ned Trifle II, Friday, 18 July 2008 10:41 (seventeen years ago)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_7652000/7652268.stm
:-/
― 100 tons of hardrofl beyond zings (Just got offed), Sunday, 5 October 2008 01:01 (seventeen years ago)
Fucking Derby, those fuckers still point at airplanes.
― Poll Wall (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 5 October 2008 01:06 (seventeen years ago)
I gather it's somewhat shite. I know a guy from there, he says as much.
― 100 tons of hardrofl beyond zings (Just got offed), Sunday, 5 October 2008 01:11 (seventeen years ago)
daaaamn
― a passion for posting (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 5 October 2008 01:24 (seventeen years ago)
i bet u he becomes a 4chan legend
yup
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Shaun_Dykes
― a passion for posting (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 5 October 2008 01:26 (seventeen years ago)
goya, oh boya
― Eisbaer, Sunday, 5 October 2008 07:52 (seventeen years ago)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/lincolnshire/7656953.stm
This guy was friends with the sister of the guy I'm staying with. He tells me what actually happened, that the guy had his head kicked in by bouncers.
― 100 tons of hardrofl beyond zings (Just got offed), Wednesday, 8 October 2008 02:20 (seventeen years ago)
Rob Howard, the school's head teacher, said: "I feel very angry that there are people out there who are so desensitised to life that they just see it as a film or a soap opera. I don't think they realise what the consequences of their actions are going to be, but it is clearly disturbing."
I think they do realize; it's just that they don't care -- they were never sensitized to begin with. I'm always kind of astonished at the number of people who see other people as things; I'm not sure how many of them are bona fide, irredeemable sociopaths, vs. people who have some chance, however slight, to gain a degree of empathy (which typically involves going through some experience of intense suffering or terror).
― Charlie Rose Nylund, Wednesday, 8 October 2008 02:56 (seventeen years ago)
Didn't that used to come naturally?
― Niles Caulder, Wednesday, 8 October 2008 07:14 (seventeen years ago)
Tuomas sfos on this btw. A pet has come to think it is a member of yr family/group; abusing it's not morally far off putting yr baby sibling in the microwave/etc. Meat industry; meat industry. Animal wouldn't even've existed otherwise. Not QUITE the fucking same. Hippy.
― Niles Caulder, Wednesday, 8 October 2008 07:16 (seventeen years ago)
Um not that I'm v fond of the meat industry, but that was retarded. And long long ago, I know.
― Niles Caulder, Wednesday, 8 October 2008 07:17 (seventeen years ago)
Tuomas sfos on this btw. A pet has come to think it is a member of yr family/group; abusing it's not morally far off putting yr baby sibling in the microwave/etc. Meat industry; meat industry.
Except that I wasn't really commenting on the mindset of the person who put the kitten in the microwave (which of course is fucked up), rather than the folks who are all "Oh no! A kitten was killed! How terrible!", and yet have no problem with eating mass-produced chicken or pork or veal.
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 8 October 2008 07:46 (seventeen years ago)
Meat industry; meat industry. Animal wouldn't even've existed otherwise. Not QUITE the fucking same. Hippy.This calls for SYSTEMS THINKING. Boxcar! NO NO NO!
― Dan I., Wednesday, 8 October 2008 07:56 (seventeen years ago)
Tuomas I'd like to think they perceive some diff/get some perspective on what they do every day while eating but yr prob right. Sorry to be mean to you. Killing a pet is way more fucked up tho right? MENTALLY?
― Niles Caulder, Wednesday, 8 October 2008 08:10 (seventeen years ago)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8026807.stm
― sorry for british (country matters), Thursday, 30 April 2009 16:44 (sixteen years ago)