Scarlett Johansson ?actress? actually is a clone from original person Scarlett Galabekian

IT IS NOT A SPAM, but if you received that message second and plus time JUST CLICK DELETE button and have a nice day. Don't feel bad, please understand original Scarlett's family very desperate to shut down that humiliating antichristian "actress" clones line career development. Hello dear Ladies and Gentlemen! I would like inform you that Scarlett Johansson ?actress? actually is a clone from original person Scarlett Galabekian last name, who has nothing with acting career, surname Galabekian, because of adoption happened in 1992. Clones was created illegally by using stolen biological material. Original person is very nice (not d**n sexy),most important - CHRISTIAN young lady! I'll tell you more,those clones (it's not only one) made in GERMANY - world leader manufacturer of humans clones, it is in Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Rhineland-Palatinate, Mr. Helmut Kohl home town. You can not even imaging the scale of the cloning activity. But warning! Helmut Kohl clone staff strictly controlling all their clones (at least they trying) spreading around the world, they are very accurate with that, some of them are still NAZI type disciplined and mind controlled clones, so be careful get close with clones you will be controlled as well. Original person is not happy with those movies, images, video, rumors and etc. spreading on media in that way it would be really nice if we all will try slow down that ''actress'' career development, original Scarlett will really appreciated that. Please remember that original Scarlett's family did not authorize any activity with stolen biological materials, no matter what form it was created in it was stolen and it is stolen. It all need to be delivered to authorize personals control in Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. Original Scarlett never was engaged, by the way! Her close friend Serge G. P.S. CONTROLLING ACTIVITY OF ANY CLONES IS US MILITARY OPERATION. Check also here: http://www.flickfilosopher.com/blog/2008/10/warning_stolen_biological_mate.html H.R. 534, the Human Cloning Prohibition Act of 2003, was introduced to the U.S. House of Representatives on February 5, 2003. After discussion, it was passed on February 27 by a vote of 241-155. It now moves on to the Senate for consideration. This bill makes it unlawful for any person or entity to perform or participate in human cloning, or to ship or receive embryos produced by human cloning. The penalties are imprisonment of up to 10 years and fines of $1 million or more. These now join other nations as diverse as Norway, Australia, and many other countries, which had already added cloning for any purpose to their criminal code. And in Germany where it carries a penalty of five years imprisonment they know a thing or two about unethical science.

http://www.melawend.com/The%20Island%20poster%20-%20Ewan%20McGregor%20and%20Scarlett%20Johansson.jpg

Scarlett Gabbnebkian

http://img365.imageshack.us/img365/8086/scarlettgalaxian.jpg

wondering if ten years from spam will be the main source of narrative storytelling in our culture

Weird, I got the same spam (although truncated) a couple months ago on one of the websites I work on. I saved it because it was amusing.

Scarlett Johansson (actress)actually is a clone from original person,who has nothing with acting career.Clone was created from stolen biomaterial.Original Scarlett Galabekian last name is nice,CHRISTIAN young lady.Clones(not 1)made in GERMANY,leader manufacturer of humans clones,it's in Ludwigshafen am Rhein,N.Bavaria,Mr.Helmut Kohl home town,they spreading globaly NAZI type disciplined and mind controlled,be careful get close you'll be controlled too.Original family didn't authorize activity with stolen biomaterials,it's all should go to Cedars-Sinai MedCenter in LA.Controlling clones is US military operation.Original Scarlett isn't engage,by the wy

Good Times

lol cedars

this is exciting news, now we can all have one.

Scarlett Galabekian News and Juicy Gossip | SoSoJuicy
The latest Scarlett Galabekian news and juicy gossip from the best celebrity news sources on the web. Updated every minute.
www.sosojuicy.com/category/person/scarlett-galabekian - 13k - Cached - Similar pages -

I'd invest my life savings in three scarlett clones right now

Scarlett clones are trading at 5.48 on the Nasdaq right now

IT IS NOT A SPAM

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/scarlett-johansson-naked-pictures-leaked-180314922.html

I'm concerned these will be down by the time I get home today; I'm thinking of asking my principal if I can book off for the afternoon.

too late already my friend. every copy has been deleted.

yeah the problem with the Internet is that it's just too easy to censor information

My kingdom for a screen shot.

http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6077/6146094986_db112c030c_o.jpg

http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6160/6146095308_35cbc0a849_o.jpg

u can thank me later

A female doing my lecherous bidding--now I'm really blushing.

ha

I just C+Pd them from another thread. nbd.

By Bob Tourtellotte | Reuters – 23 hours ago

leaked cell pics nowhere near as triumphant as the Galaxian shop upthread

...and the pix themselves are nowhere as good as the Blake Lively ones imo

What do you feel about this article?

happy
informative
odd
boring
angry
interesting
sad
worried

IT IS NOT A SPAM

― 14 karat gold steen computer wizard (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Saturday, March 21, 2009 3:01 AM (2 years ago) Bookmark

Kind of related? (Sort of?)

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/nicolas-cage-awoken-naked-man-fudgesicle-222238383.html

"It was two in the morning. I was living in Orange County at the time and was asleep with my wife. My two-year old at the time was in another room. I opened my eyes and there was a naked man wearing my leather jacket eating a Fudgesicle in front of my bed," he told reporters on Wednesday.

I don't think Nicolas Cage understands what "naked" means

i think 'only wearing a leather jacket' should qualify as a special, honorary variety of nakedness

Porky Pig Style

That not being a link to ScarJo "Porky Pig Style" is like the worst thing that has happened to me today.

i wonder if it's really her in the pics

oh i missed the fbi thing.

This is not an important enough naked person to involve the FBI, ffs.

is it just me or are those p tame

As long as the photos are out there, these gals should just make a deal with Taschen for a nice coffee-table book of cell-phone nudes.

if i worked for the fbi i would probably volunteer for NAKED ACTRESS SCANDAL though
xxp

national treasure imo

"is it just me or are those p tame"

imagination is always better than reality

Disappointing!

i think the CIA should handle this, with cooperation with the Mossad.

it could never match my sweet imagination

xp damn

What did you guys expect? "Wide Open ScarJo?"

no fistula no credibility

do you have a link? lol
xpost

y'all won't be laughing so hard when the naked twitpic g-men come knocking at your door

well that's me done with heterosexuality. (xxp)

quite happy with the pics tbh

that's a proud ass, i'll say that much

I was so discombobulated by this story, I didn't even get history mayne and iatee's follow-up jokes to my original post till now, five hours later; you can see from my response that I actually thought they'd all been deleted.

For a lady with such a fantastic bosom I was amazed by how much I fancy that ass.

that's a proud ass, i'll say that much

yeah can't claim to be disappointed in this regard. Thanking u ENBB

lol xpost

http://www2.macleans.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/scarlett-johansson-hand.jpg

yeah thanks for hacking us those pics enbb

promise to act as character witness when the fbi finally catches up with you boo

the source of the disappointment

xxpost

I really hope during the FBI internal meetings on this, a supervisor said something about protecting America's "ASSets" and everyone giggled.

lol np Schlump

does no one feel even a little bit weirded out about these? and the invasion of privacy they entail? not gonna be like "i didnt look" but its like

nah completely

y'all won't be laughing so hard when the naked twitpic g-men come knocking at your door

After I stop laughing I will ask them to put on some clothes

anybody who takes naked pictures of themselves on a digital device is basically an idiot/asking for trouble. which goes double for famous people/public officials, so no I don't really feel weird about it. I see naked actresses/actors all the time.

first the naked twitpic g-men came

for scar-jo and I said nothing... but I looked

yeah, thats true, this is definitely scarlett johanssons fault, also, its true, ive seen naked actresses/actors all the time

are you the guy who leaked the pics?

so conflicted over scarlett's butt, just don't know what to do

cant believe i felt even a little bit weird

butt shock

shook; that booty

if i worked for the fbi i would probably volunteer for NAKED ACTRESS SCANDAL though
xxp

― and my soul said you can't go there (schlump), Thursday, September 15, 2011 6:26 PM (58 minutes ago)

"yeah this is the fbi we're gonna need some...additional pics. to verify their authenticity."

anybody who takes naked pictures of themselves on a digital device is basically an idiot/asking for trouble. which goes double for famous people/public officials, so no I don't really feel weird about it. I see naked actresses/actors all the time.

― I saw Mike Love walk by a computer once (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 September 2011 00:23 (2 minutes ago) Bookmark

this is p weird? like each stage of it is a weird statement. that digital makes things easier/migratable isn't any kind of defence; everyone should be entitled to- like it isn't even 'privacy', just, not having people steal & then distribute their personal effects; & i can't be appropriately sarcastic about the last point, it is just weird.

Original person is not happy with those movies, images, video, rumors and etc. spreading on media in that way it would be really nice if we all will try slow down that ''actress'' career development, original Scarlett will really appreciated that. Please remember that original Scarlett's family did not authorize any activity with stolen biological materials, no matter what form it was created in it was stolen and it is stolen. It all need to be delivered to authorize personals control in Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles.

'how do you feel about naked pictures of scarlett johansson being stolen and distributed'
'well, it's clearly wrong'
'would you like to see these pictures'
'yes. yes i would'

Nothing contradictory or weird in that imo

I guess I don't feel weird about it because this is now a normal thing in our culture that happens all the time. there are celebrities who have built entire careers out of it. it is not unusual, in fact it's so predictable that you can take it for granted that one of these "scandals" is going to break on any given day. it may be "wrong" or a violation of privacy in the traditional sense, but the fact is the world is different now. everyone has much less privacy than before. this is a fact, it's just the way it is.

that being said, if you're a celebrity, why would you take naked pictures of yourself with a device that was built to easily and quickly distribute its contents. it's just kind of stupid...? I've never taken naked pictures of myself with anything because I am a) not an idiot, and b) not really interested in propagating naked images of myself. In this day and age you sort of have to be a combination of both in order to do this.

part of me felt weird IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN RIGHT

I've never taken naked pictures of myself with anything because I am a) not an idiot, and b) not really interested in propagating naked images of myself.

one day you'll slip up, and the world will be waiting...

yeah i just dont really think blaming scarlett johansson is the key to making this all better

not to get "too real" here but "it was stupid of her to take digital photos of herself" is the exact same line of thinking that dismisses date rape with "it was stupid of her to get so drunk"

that digital makes things easier/migratable isn't any kind of defence; everyone should be entitled to- like it isn't even 'privacy', j

if anything the last 10 years have made it abundantly obvious that dealing with digital media negates your privacy. it's not a question of legality or what people should be entitled to, it's the nature of the beast/the price to be paid - it's built-in to the technology, it's in its nature.

I don't mean to come off as overly harsh to Scarlett (I like her!) or "blame" her but on some level she must have known this was a possibility, and not a remote one, and thought better of it.

xp

exact

I kinda feel sorry for scar-jo; probably her handlers have coached her a million times to NOT TAKE PICTURES OF YOURSELF NAKED and to NOT TAKE PICTURES OF YOURSELF NAKED and whatever you do DON'T TAKE NAKED PICTURES OF YOURSELF. but for some people, taking naked pictures of yourself can be a scintillating, titillating, and even empowering action to do. that probably one of the consensual picks for top 10 hottest women in the world is barred* from doing what every horny teenager in America can do seems kind of sad.

*until now!

was this galabekian thing an alternate reality game thing that no one figured out? what's the connection to the pics now?

ooh a rape analogy, that'll be helpful

xp

okay, but, hmm, it still kind of is a question of legality

i dont recommend walking through [dangerous neighbhorhood] at 3 am? but if i get robbed the people who robbed me *still committed a crime*

right from the first post, I had high hopes for this thread

if anything the last 10 years have made it abundantly obvious that dealing with digital media negates your privacy. it's not a question of legality or what people should be entitled to, it's the nature of the beast/the price to be paid - it's built-in to the technology, it's in its nature.

you're still allowed to think it's weird! the last ten years have taught us a lot of ugly things that apparently can't be changed.

nobody here denying that a crime has been committed, max.

Max OTM imo but he looked as did I and most other people who saw any of the three threads they're now posted on here or numerous other places online. I figured I'd just be saving people time by posting those earlier and did so without really thinking but I will admit that as soon as I did so I felt bad about it because of exactly what you said. Yes, it's weird.

but if i get robbed the people who robbed me *still committed a crime*

I don't think anyone would deny that whoever hacked her phone has broken the law/is a jerk. kinda taken for granted, given the letter of the law.

that wasn't what you asked about though.

that being said, if you're a celebrity, why would you take naked pictures of yourself with a device that was built to easily and quickly distribute its contents. it's just kind of stupid...? I've never taken naked pictures of myself with anything because I am a) not an idiot, and b) not really interested in propagating naked images of myself. In this day and age you sort of have to be a combination of both in order to do this.

lots of reasons! because first and foremost you are a human, who might take pictures of themselves for any of the reasons humans do - curiosity, self-image, narcissism, whatever - & perhaps even more as a practical measure, considering the various aspects of being an actor that rotate around the projection & receipt of one's image. & why do it with 'a device that was built to easily & quickly distribute its contents'?; because it is there; because it beats taking it to a developer!, & enables immediate, private review, etc. i think it's kinda callous to suggest that some sense of reliance on or entitlement to privacy is either wrong or naive - taking pictures of yourself, the idea that you would think 'oh i probably shouldn't do that' just seems incredibly dispiriting. you should be able to do that. thinking 'someone might steal my shit' is a sad mentality to have to incorporate.

xxxxxxxxp

yeah darragh but the blame is being shifted off the people who stole the photos and the people who looked at and "create demand" for the photos (myself included) and onto scarlett johansson, which... sucks

you're still allowed to think it's weird! the last ten years

10 years of something and it's still weird to you?

I actually thought about it for like a half hour after I'd posted them because I felt so guilty. :/ I'm over it now but if I were a site-wide mod I'd probably gone back and deleted that post soon thereafter. I didn't feel good about it.

you should be able to do that

but... you aren't.

tbh I didn't feel weird until I rubbed one out to these pics

people should also be housed and fed for free, imho

I was pretty cool with it up until

jeez erica come off it you COMMITTED A CRIME

i mean i hate to be all "rape culture" but like, "our [collective] insatiable desires cannot be controlled" is not a great way to brush off the violation of privacy/intimacy/etc going on here

The thing that gets me though is why ppl store the pics on their phones. Send 'em to whomever they're intended for and then delete that shit imo. I just don't get why you'd keep them.

guys celebrities are totally contemptible. come on.

poor brett favre :(

I'm not brushing it off I'm just explaining why I didn't find it weird! because we live in a non-private culture, and we have for awhile now. I do not like it! but it is what it is.

xp

tbtc i am not really trying to harsh anyones n00ds buzz i was just feeling weird that no one itt even felt the need to *acknowledge* how effed up it is.

guys celebrities are totally contemptible. come on.

― strongo hulkington's ghost dad, Thursday, September 15, 2011 7:45 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

ya but horney internet nerds are *more* contemptible

Yo Scarjo in case you ever find this thread - I'm sorry for being an accomplice in the spreading of these photos. That said, you have a really amazing butt.

And shouldn't give a shit if everyone in the world sees it tbh.

people should also be housed and fed for free, imho

i don't think "people should be entitled to do what they want in their houses" is the same as some kinda utopian "free housing for all" argument, although i can get behind it shakey mo otm. i just think in terms of gauging a personal boundary between your actions & the potential risks they involve, you would hope you were still able to act fairly freely and autonomously in your own house, doing something pretty introspective & personal (rather than necessarily 'titillating' or w/e), without feeling like you should keep it in check & accept the loss of that freedom.

i don't think "people should be entitled to do what they want in their houses" is the same as some kinda utopian "free housing for all"

it is now

all watched over by machines of loving grace etc

tbf humanity as a whole is completely contemptible and we should all be wiped off the face of the earth. really staring at stolen celebrity ass pics is somewhere pretty low on the list of evidence against us.

don't think blame for the crime is being attributed to her, though i also kind of agree that digital images of your naked scarlett self are going to require careful keeping.

more like in watermelon sugar

the galabekian thing is more disturbing. anthony weiner was never accused of being a nazi clone.

anyway if u guys think scarlett johansson feels bad just think of poor scarlett galabekian

don't think blame for the crime is being attributed to her, though i also kind of agree that digital images of your naked scarlett self are going to require careful keeping.

― talking heads, quiet smith (darraghmac), Thursday, September 15, 2011 7:50 PM (36 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

eh its just off-putting to be like "man this is weird" and the response is not "yeah, its pretty fucked up, i feel bad" its, "WELL SHE SHOULDNT HAVE TAKEN THEM IN THE FIRST PLACE" and its like

Yo Scarjo in case you ever find this thread - I'm sorry for being an accomplice in the spreading of these photos. That said, you have a really amazing butt.

― your mom the burrito (ENBB), Thursday, September 15, 2011 6:47 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark

I was sincerely like, oh here's a link of scarlett johansson naked and that was it, then I clicked it, now I post

thanks enbb

i support her right to take these because if i was scarlett johansson id probably want some pics of my own ass to look at during the times when i couldnt do so with a mirror

i think max is otm that it is weird that it took so long for people to 'talk about this' but I think it is a little bit more complicated when you are a public figure who makes $$$$$$$ pretty much entirely off your sex appeal. the 'demand' for scarjo n00ds came from somewhere - the 'demand' for scarjo n00ds is paying for her big house or whatever. so I mean, she can and should be mad, whoever did this should go to jail - but she should still probably put it in context.

yeah i think it is kinda rich for any of us to refer to our own inclination/disinclination to photograph our naked selves, as we are not scarlett johansson

gross thread

granted, next time we'll take a minute for introspection...? I don't know what you're looking for there, tbh, though i think everyone agrees with you on it being a shitty thing to happen etc, i think putting a guilt trip-however light, tbf- on the internet viewer is in itself a kinda strange response.

a public figure who makes $$$$$$$ pretty much entirely off your sex appeal

yes and no. there's a demand for upskirt pics too. or shit, phone hacking.

i know that women who have upskirt pics taken of them shd have worn trousers, just saying

well everyone should wear underpants. i mean who raised these kids, wolves?

I think it is a little bit more complicated when you are a public figure who makes $$$$$$$ pretty much entirely off your sex appeal

ehh but- she's a good actor, you know? like i know that prominence is maybe only afforded to the beautiful &c, but it seems problematic to think that beautiful women actors should have to accept as a foregone conclusion the extent to which they are appreciate only in that regard, only as an uncontrollable urge. maybe it's, 'you're crazy if you think that hollywood hires people based entirely on acting merit', but not necessarily 'since i am attractive i have to run with what goes with the territory'

yeah but some girl in a skirt who gets on the subway doesn't agree beforehand to get paid money so people can take pictures of her.

xp

it's hard to argue that scarjo's rise to fame had anything to do w/ her being a good actress

None of these analogies really work for a variety of reasons. Yes, it's weird and I'm glad someone brought it up because like I said earlier, I actually thought about it a lot earlier today. That said, we all looked and should just agree it's a bit strange but that's it. There's not much more to say, really.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3gbi-NgWBk

"enhance"

http://www.screenwritingforhollywood.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/scarlett_butt.jpg

i love watching movies with scarjo in them but are there really ppl who would consider her a 'good actress'??

this is neither here nor there in terms of buttgate but she's not even remotely a "good" actress

now that said even hacks deserve their privacy

*goes to reorganize his collection of nude clint howard jpegs*

it's hard to argue that scarjo's rise to fame had anything to do w/ her being a good actress

Yeah, she was megasexy in North.

isn't most of her appeal in movies like lost in translation or brilliant auteur film The Island that she's pretty much a cipher?

it's hard to argue that scarjo's rise to fame had anything to do w/ her being a good actress

?
she was like the 'interesting girl with the deep voice' in ghost world who got a part in lost in translation; if you accept that acting is more than the mechanics of being able to convincingly imitate someone else or w/e - is charisma & appeal & presence & familiarity & whatever else - she was good, & interesting, & had promise, & has been good in stuff since (pls no-one link to the zoo thread); she's great in match point. the voice thing made her kinda 'distinctive', too, i think.

xp

she is an "opaque" "ingenue"

to everyone who feels bad about viewing the pictures you may receive penance after having stared at the following picture for 10 seconds

http://bigbeefandbeer.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Headshot-Clint-Howard-smSFW.jpg

what's wrong with clint? he's a cool character actor.

i just feel worse and worse reading this thread

I'm mostly angry at strongo for making me momentarily picture clint howard naked.

do you guys think she sent these pictures to Sean Penn? Kinda gross

ENBB you are continuing to picture clint howard naked

I think she's good in Ghost World, and very good in Lost in Translation.

i wonder if steve buscemi's naked pics would be as insouciant as bill murray's.

if anyone wants free clint howard nudes btw hit me up at opiesbrothersc✧✧✧@gm✧✧✧.c✧✧

so that's what it took to kill this thread

she did send them to sean penn, yes

http://diamondbag.tripod.com/images/spicoli2.jpg

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6XaSF_3HiMA/TZCfjZ48YxI/AAAAAAAAARA/_oWwPeDcSDE/s1600/sean_penn.jpg

lmao

tbtc

to be totally cool

i'm gonna rank these behind rihanna but ahead of cassie in top leaked nudez

by what criteria

we can't reveal that information

actually, revised nudez rankings

1. kat dennings
2. rihanna
3. scarjo
4. cassie

the j0rdan that says "well i don't really care about tits" about kreayshawn nudez and then ranks kat dennings at the top does not compute

i care about kat dennings' tits

you're otm though, 2-4 are just a couple seconds of "oh" and then i go back to ogling them fully clothed at any opportunity and not even thinking about the fact that i ever saw them nude

where's the pic of kat's dennings

on the internet

the FBI was cool with letting those things hang out so they're pretty easy to find

she complained but they were like "no...this is for the good of the nation"

TMZ is reporting that phone pics have leaked of a fully clothed Paz de la Huerta.

I have pet theory that the Dennings leaked her own pics in a failed ploy to get posters on imdb to stop slagging her off as "fat".

I never heard of or saw her photos until tonight, and the sad non-functional fireplace distracts me from her legit ample beauty.

?actress?

I never heard of or saw her photos until tonight, and the sad non-functional fireplace distracts me from her legit ample beauty.

I'd never even heard of HER until this discussion

You people haven't seen Nick & Norah's Infinite Playlist? Hollywood's faux-hipster factory has failed.

rihanna's butt >>>>> scarjo's butt

k perry pics > these

You know, I had no idea that Scarlett Johansson's boobs were that big.

In any case, she was good in Ghost World.

http://www.theonion.com/articles/fbi-probing-johansson-phone-hack,26100/

rihanna's butt >>>>> scarjo's butt

― dayo, Friday, 16 September 2011 10:38 (Yesterday)

apples and oranges, really. A really awesome apple and a really awesome orange.

nah, not apples and oranges. rihanna wins.

You can talk about whose butt is tighter all night if you want, but Scarlett's leaked pics are the most adorable.

http://s3-ak.buzzfed.com/static/imagebuzz/web03/2011/9/16/1/censoring-leaked-scarlett-johansson-nude-pics-wit-14496-1316152082-12.jpg

omg nightmare material

OMG why would you do that?!

smgdh.

hmpf.

I only report the news.

The thing that gets me though is why ppl store the pics on their phones. Send 'em to whomever they're intended for and then delete that shit imo. I just don't get why you'd keep them.

Yeah I think if you don't want them to enter the public domain at all, then prob don't send them either tbh.

That puglet johansson is grim.

"starlets who think they an take and send naked pictures privately without them ever leaking" is kind of getting into the "politicians who think they can cheat on their wives without anyone finding out" arena of stupidity at this point imo

like should she be able to take these kinds of pics without them getting hacked? yes, sure. should she ever have assumed she actually could, after all the examples to the contrary? not really.

feel like secxy celebrities should be more abt making sex tapes for our consumptions (via cell phone hacking ring) than these n00dz if u think abt it

thing is every A-list director and photographer in the world would have jumped at the chance to assist her in being publicly naked in a 'classy' context but she was like nah i'm just gonna take a quick titty pic for sean penn

what if celebrities were like required to 'do porn'

but only the hot ones igwos

lookin forward to the fran drescher sex tape

"drescher? but I'm not done yet!"

http://i.imgur.com/uISYg.jpg

would view

dayo the whole "setting yourself up for a joke that isn't even funny across 2 posts" thing is just painful to watch homie

man that joke took me 2 months to think of, so hurt that some dude didn't find it funny on the internet

guise lets try to focus, who do u thinks gonna be the next clebrty n00d hack ??

http://www.billboard.com/photos/artist/1099520-justin-bieber.jpg

id like to thank not only god but also jesus for these sweet bieber n00dz

bieber called the fbi when pictures of his naked forehead uncovered by bangs leaked iirc

beiber more like brb

thing is every A-list director and photographer in the world would have jumped at the chance to assist her in being publicly naked in a 'classy' context but she was like nah i'm just gonna take a quick titty pic for sean penn

"Sean - Oliver Stone took these pics. U like? :-) xox SJ"

haha

oliver stone more likely to make a searching polemical takedown of why the photos are in fact disgraceful fakes

I'm positive the shadows in Scarlett's mirror photo don't fall at the right angle, and that rifle she's holding has obviously been Photoshopped in.

http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lrodtdR3Et1qanb21o1_r1_500.jpg

Lolz

Jackman caught feelings on the set of Scoop and/or The Prestige

it's taken me a couple minutes but i think i've finally absorbed just how truly huge scarjo's butt is

it's not huge, it's shapely

clASSic

solid white girl ass, i could dance to it, i give it an A-, don

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=859C6EMEt3g

Dude who hacked her account got 10 years. For comparison's sake, Michael Jackson's doctor got four years. Hundreds of coldblooded killers and rapists I imagine regularly get less.

Celebrity justice is a cruel mistress.

usa is out of control w sending people to jail

What would he have gotten had he shot her?

no one gets less for murder, manslaughter, attempted, sure

http://i.imgur.com/UM0ZIqh.jpg

^^ScarJo The Hutt