post your progressive score

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/03/progressive_quiz.html

286

wow heaven is cool (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:07 (sixteen years ago)

279

It is not enough to love mankind – you must be able to stand (Michael White), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:07 (sixteen years ago)

361.

kate78, Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:13 (sixteen years ago)

320 <------- spot the non-American

Free the Northampton 1 (Tom D.), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:13 (sixteen years ago)

348, and I'm not merely american, but Texan.

Thrills as Cheap as Gas (Oilyrags), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:14 (sixteen years ago)

330 but some of those questions were stupid.

Monkey SBanner (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:15 (sixteen years ago)

250ish, I did it a while ago.

Blackout Crew are the Beatles of donk (jim), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:15 (sixteen years ago)

xp agreed. 336

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)

300

pretty stupid questions imo

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)

LOL, I accidentally agreed strongly with the "...life begins at conception and must be protected from then" question

Free the Northampton 1 (Tom D.), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)

For example "The main responsibility of corporations is to generate profit for their shareholders" well yes it is but is that a good thing and does believing that make you a conservative?

Monkey SBanner (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)

An online quiz with badly phrased (at minimum) questions? Say it ain't so!

Thrills as Cheap as Gas (Oilyrags), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:16 (sixteen years ago)

325

iatee, Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)

337. But I'm from Yurp.

chap, Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)

280! Well, it is called the Progressive Quiz!

jel --, Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:17 (sixteen years ago)

A bunch of those questions I am only aware of as "party lines" for one side or another, so I was knowingly answering them as a "progressive". Ie I am not educated about the issues OUTSIDE OF the debate about whether they're progressive or conservative. I think I missed the ground floor somewhere.

How can there be male ladybugs? (Laurel), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:18 (sixteen years ago)

341, but so many of the questions were retarded and impossible to answer

Dr. Johnson (askance johnson), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:19 (sixteen years ago)

317 but some of those questions were stupid.

The-Reverend (rev), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:19 (sixteen years ago)

yeah, noodle, that one in particular stuck out to me, too.

ditto the question about "big gov't" v. "limited gov't"

big, wasteful gov't is bad to everyone, and a limited gov't is good if it's limited to what you think gov't ought to be doing! one man's limited gov't limits spending to defense, the other to social programs, etc.

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:19 (sixteen years ago)

295, although a lot of those questions need some unpacking, obvs.

lolling through my bagel (Pancakes Hackman), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:19 (sixteen years ago)

There was one about whether the free market is good for America, to which I thought 'yeah it's good for America'.

chap, Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:20 (sixteen years ago)

I think I misread some of the questions and put 0, when it should've been ten, ack.

jel --, Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:20 (sixteen years ago)

Would've been better with questions like "America Should Nuke the Commie-Nazis Y/N?"

Monkey SBanner (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:21 (sixteen years ago)

276, I am very progressive! Boogie!

Mark G, Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:21 (sixteen years ago)

334

rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:22 (sixteen years ago)

i just put 5 for some of the dumber, more loaded questions

i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:23 (sixteen years ago)

btw my score result added "Morbs, move out of Dreamland"

Dr Morbius, Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:24 (sixteen years ago)

xpost

Yeah, there were a couple were I thought "don't know don't care" and gave them 5.

Monkey SBanner (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:24 (sixteen years ago)

329

Barackin' In the Free World (B.L.A.M.), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)

291

Luka ModReq (DJ Mencap), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:27 (sixteen years ago)

324! i thought i would come out less...

goole, Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:31 (sixteen years ago)

333 and yeah some of these q's are lame

Just one thing I was thinking about as I was getting on the copter (J0hn D.), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:35 (sixteen years ago)

380 woo hoo I am evil.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:36 (sixteen years ago)

a little more web traffic to CAP is all right by me

goole, Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:37 (sixteen years ago)

281

snoball, Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:41 (sixteen years ago)

291

Hard House SugBanton (blueski), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:43 (sixteen years ago)

314.

Where's the fuckin' 10 key, tho?

meta pro lols (libcrypt), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:44 (sixteen years ago)

335 - but it didn't breach some of the issues I'm more "conservative" on.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:57 (sixteen years ago)

I thought this thread was going to be about car insurance, at first.

meta pro lols (libcrypt), Thursday, 12 March 2009 17:57 (sixteen years ago)

damn, i'm the least progressive so far. Need Cunga to do this shit or something. Or bring back roger adultery.

Blackout Crew are the Beatles of donk (jim), Thursday, 12 March 2009 18:00 (sixteen years ago)

-50 he'd be.

Blackout Crew are the Beatles of donk (jim), Thursday, 12 March 2009 18:00 (sixteen years ago)

275

now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Thursday, 12 March 2009 18:06 (sixteen years ago)

267 - jim, we're not so far apart. I think I answered almost all of the questions "the correct way" but I gave a lot of 8's and 3's - though I did say that the free market does better at creating jobs and economic growth, and that corporations are responsible to provide profits to shareholders. I think there were a number of these that in theory I'd have given a 10, but pragmatically ended up with 8s and 7s because I felt "that would be great, but it's not gonna happen in my lifetime."

I like ian's contribution to this thread. I would've been stoked if this was a progressive musical score thread.

what happened? I'm confused. (sarahel), Thursday, 12 March 2009 18:52 (sixteen years ago)

333, kind of surprised. i knew i'd be on the progressive end but i didn't think to that extent

mark cl, Thursday, 12 March 2009 19:19 (sixteen years ago)

349

lol i r more progressive than morbs OMGWTF

LOLBJ (Eisbaer), Thursday, 12 March 2009 19:27 (sixteen years ago)

THIS TEST WAS TOO LONG

but basically i am an unreformed, unrepentant communist-ish hippie flake

laceychabertfan@aol.com (dell), Thursday, 12 March 2009 19:30 (sixteen years ago)

306

2 ears + 1 ❤ (Pillbox), Thursday, 12 March 2009 19:34 (sixteen years ago)

296 (and I'm an Army veteran.)

xhuxk, Thursday, 12 March 2009 19:49 (sixteen years ago)

338

ice cr?m, Thursday, 12 March 2009 20:02 (sixteen years ago)

262

bnw, Thursday, 12 March 2009 20:09 (sixteen years ago)

308

Say what you like Professor Words (Ned Trifle II), Thursday, 12 March 2009 20:10 (sixteen years ago)

Anyone keeping an ILX running average?

Say what you like Professor Words (Ned Trifle II), Thursday, 12 March 2009 20:10 (sixteen years ago)

286

Euler, Thursday, 12 March 2009 20:16 (sixteen years ago)

336, me and morbs are prog bros

and how (omar little), Thursday, 12 March 2009 20:22 (sixteen years ago)

372, but because it's just a stupid internet quiz I was answering with 0s and 10s where I would normally answer with 3s or 8s. Bit disappointed I'm not the *most* progressive on here. Curse you, Alex in SF!

emil.y, Thursday, 12 March 2009 20:26 (sixteen years ago)

237

The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 12 March 2009 20:28 (sixteen years ago)

boy, I guess this makes me the board's Nelson Rockefeller.

The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 12 March 2009 20:29 (sixteen years ago)

303

avoided some loaded questions by hitting '5'.

The Lost Boys Buff Guy Playing Sax (rockapads), Thursday, 12 March 2009 20:30 (sixteen years ago)

285

Deborah Drapper: Servant Of God (jjjusten), Thursday, 12 March 2009 20:37 (sixteen years ago)

304

Yeah, the corporate/shareholder one bothered me too. Yes, of course that's their primary "responsibility." To say otherwise would be nonsensical. It's precisely the amoral, asocial nature of a corporation that requires government regulation, but to put the "responsibility" on the corporation is meaningless.

Bonobos in Paneradise (Hurting 2), Thursday, 12 March 2009 20:38 (sixteen years ago)

It's precisely the amoral, asocial nature of a corporation that requires government regulation

yes, and also if the rules are predefined, other corporations are beholden to the line they must not cross, which acts as a leveller to the corporate arena in general.

I thank you.

Mark G, Thursday, 12 March 2009 20:48 (sixteen years ago)

but because it's just a stupid internet quiz I was answering with 0s and 10s where I would normally answer with 3s or 8s.

A little bit of this, for sure.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Thursday, 12 March 2009 20:49 (sixteen years ago)

^^ that's my take on it, too. Some corporations determine that contributing to social welfare and considering the "greater good" lead to being more profitable. Because people regularly act on the basis of morality, morality needs to play some role in calculating profit and future profit. However, people also do immoral and stupid shit, and government has to regulate individual behavior, thus it makes no sense that government shouldn't regulate corporations, runs by people, who by nature do immoral and stupid shit.

what happened? I'm confused. (sarahel), Thursday, 12 March 2009 20:53 (sixteen years ago)

whoops ... "^^" refer to hurting2's post.

what happened? I'm confused. (sarahel), Thursday, 12 March 2009 20:54 (sixteen years ago)

284. I'm surprised I scored lower than most you guys but not that astounded cause I rarely pick the extremes. I always to put things in question even when I'm very much in favour of'em.

the tip of the tongue taking a trip tralalala (stevienixed), Thursday, 12 March 2009 21:41 (sixteen years ago)

293

Captain Savour-A-Ho (Batty), Thursday, 12 March 2009 21:53 (sixteen years ago)

Okay, some more scores which are higher and people will think I love Palin. :-((((

the tip of the tongue taking a trip tralalala (stevienixed), Thursday, 12 March 2009 21:57 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.cygnus-x1.net/links/rush/images/albums/2112-cover-s.jpg

This is the day when fisticuffs happened everywhere (country matters), Thursday, 12 March 2009 21:57 (sixteen years ago)

Y'know, I think the older I get, the less conservative I become which seems contradictory.... until you meet my husband who's very progressive

CM, you had 112? heehee

the tip of the tongue taking a trip tralalala (stevienixed), Thursday, 12 March 2009 21:58 (sixteen years ago)

http://bp3.blogger.com/_3eMEt_Kktj8/R3XGomeOG8I/AAAAAAAAAGk/Nv7bNKEeRyY/s320/Ayreon_01011001_Cover.jpg

This is the day when fisticuffs happened everywhere (country matters), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:00 (sixteen years ago)

340

69, Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:02 (sixteen years ago)

i wouldn't worry about it too much. on the "see how other groups did", "Liberal Democrats" (the most liberal group ID'd) averaged a 240. ILX = buncha dirty anti-American hippie commies

xposts

now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:02 (sixteen years ago)

266 which seems ridiculously high to me

I wish I was the royal trux (sunny successor), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:03 (sixteen years ago)

303

bacon = bad for the face + magic for the moobs (Mackro Mackro), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:03 (sixteen years ago)

^ acid progression

Hard House SugBanton (blueski), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:04 (sixteen years ago)

(tbh i was surprised i only got 275. i guess all those '5' on financial issues outed me as a dittohead)

now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:04 (sixteen years ago)

Okay, some more scores which are higher and people will think I love Palin. :-((((

I scored lower than you ... I didn't choose extremes either, except on a couple things. Considering exceptions or ramifications of the questions doesn't make you a Palin-lover, it makes you thoughtful.

what happened? I'm confused. (sarahel), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:06 (sixteen years ago)

281 w/ "stupid questions" caveat

oh the smell as candles die (Sundar), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:15 (sixteen years ago)

i got 174

This is the day when fisticuffs happened everywhere (country matters), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:17 (sixteen years ago)

lololol i actually got 318

This is the day when fisticuffs happened everywhere (country matters), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:18 (sixteen years ago)

348

Simon H., Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:26 (sixteen years ago)

which liberal got 666?

The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:26 (sixteen years ago)

sarahel, i was joking about palin. :-) doesn't come as a surprise that most tend to score high here.

the tip of the tongue taking a trip tralalala (stevienixed), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:27 (sixteen years ago)

i'm blaming my "low" score on my crap english btw.

the tip of the tongue taking a trip tralalala (stevienixed), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:27 (sixteen years ago)

I got 375: lots of zeroes and 10s, a few fives. By the end of the quiz when I hit a fivable question I was all 'fence! sitting on it!'.

We Need To Talk About Kevin Smith (suzy), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:29 (sixteen years ago)

I blame my high score on answering every question except four with a 10 or a 0.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:29 (sixteen years ago)

See I rarely if ever do that. I let my finger roam over the 3s, 4s but rarely give a score higher than 8.

the tip of the tongue taking a trip tralalala (stevienixed), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:30 (sixteen years ago)

That's very European of you. ;)

Alex in SF, Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:31 (sixteen years ago)

Most of mine were in the 4-6 range.

The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:32 (sixteen years ago)

326 but I firmly answered as a left-leaning, look after everyone, save the gay whales australian. Also lol what chap said re "well its good for *America*". I 5'ed a few "dont care" or "this is stupid" q's too.

one art, please (Trayce), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:32 (sixteen years ago)

I zeroed anything that was a straight-up GOP talking point.

We Need To Talk About Kevin Smith (suzy), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:32 (sixteen years ago)

Ditto.

Alex in SF, Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:33 (sixteen years ago)

^I see what you did there.

We Need To Talk About Kevin Smith (suzy), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:34 (sixteen years ago)

yes

and how (omar little), Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:34 (sixteen years ago)

yeah there were 4 or 5 I wanted a 'stfu' button

bnw, Thursday, 12 March 2009 22:35 (sixteen years ago)

surely a scale of 1-5 would've been adequate rather than 0-10 ? The only numbers I used in this were 0, 10, and occasionally 3 and 7.

I am an extremely progressive 344.

salsa shark, Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:12 (sixteen years ago)

331

Bill A, Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:13 (sixteen years ago)

I wonder what my parents would score. Probably an "I don"t give a shit" score.

the tip of the tongue taking a trip tralalala (stevienixed), Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:13 (sixteen years ago)

112

EMPIRE STATE HYMEN (MPx4A), Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:14 (sixteen years ago)

294

I had no idea what to think about the budget deficit question & put 5 re: war in Iraq because IMHO it didn't prove such a thing, logically speaking, they should've asked if you thought the US should impose democracy, but that's not what they asked.

football consultant, oakland raiders (daria-g), Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:21 (sixteen years ago)

320

everyone saying this test is stupid is OTM

Wes HI DEREson (HI DERE), Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:22 (sixteen years ago)

yet here we are all doing it.

the tip of the tongue taking a trip tralalala (stevienixed), Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:29 (sixteen years ago)

It's a quiz and we're bored. QED.

That's When I Reach For My Sriracha (suzy), Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:30 (sixteen years ago)

lol nice display name suzy

2 ears + 1 ❤ (Pillbox), Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:31 (sixteen years ago)

347

Mordy, Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:32 (sixteen years ago)

I'd score super high, but the corporation question is dumb enough to put me off continuing.

too many misters not enough sisters (milo z), Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:32 (sixteen years ago)

yeah dumb questions.

but i scored 372.

the table is the table, Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:33 (sixteen years ago)

I just hit 5 on the stupid questions.

Mordy, Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:39 (sixteen years ago)

375 but I'm a 0 or 10 kinda guy

One of the Most High Profile Comedy Directors of the 90s (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:46 (sixteen years ago)

i hit 5 on the ones i was kinda like-- there isn't a right answer here because this question is framed so dumbly.

the table is the table, Thursday, 12 March 2009 23:51 (sixteen years ago)

what if one of the questions was about German minimal techno?!?

LOLBJ (Eisbaer), Friday, 13 March 2009 02:27 (sixteen years ago)

I thought this thread was going to be about car insurance, at first.

Me too.

341

Too Into Dancing to Argue (ENBB), Friday, 13 March 2009 02:35 (sixteen years ago)

357

czech blastcore and superHOOS culture (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Friday, 13 March 2009 03:04 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.progressive.com/teens/quizzes.aspx

meta pro lols (libcrypt), Friday, 13 March 2009 03:08 (sixteen years ago)

I got about 50% on myth vs. reality but since they don't give you a total I dunno for sure.

meta pro lols (libcrypt), Friday, 13 March 2009 03:11 (sixteen years ago)

9/10 on vanity plates!

meta pro lols (libcrypt), Friday, 13 March 2009 03:15 (sixteen years ago)

321

naus, Friday, 13 March 2009 07:26 (sixteen years ago)

And 10/10 on the vanity plates, but this show had a big impact on me as a child.

naus, Friday, 13 March 2009 07:34 (sixteen years ago)

328

M.V., Friday, 13 March 2009 07:42 (sixteen years ago)

I like how being a budget hawk now apparently gives you progressive cred.

M.V., Friday, 13 March 2009 07:44 (sixteen years ago)

309, and a big fat wtf at half of the questions

kenan, Friday, 13 March 2009 08:13 (sixteen years ago)

354

I tend to vote high or low, though, with little middle ground.

Johnny Fever, Friday, 13 March 2009 08:24 (sixteen years ago)

I put in a 5 for some of the worst ones, hoping to neutralize them. Like, "Government spending is almost always wasteful and inefficient." That one's so bad, it's can't even commit to its own premise. It lives in shame.

kenan, Friday, 13 March 2009 08:33 (sixteen years ago)

I think I gave that one a 3 or 4, given that I work for the gov't and have seen examples of both wise and unwise spending, esp. wrt travel.

naus, Friday, 13 March 2009 09:03 (sixteen years ago)

Oh sure, 5 would probably be a fine answer even if the statement was the ballsier "Government spending is wasteful and inefficient." I mean, I'm already going to rate it according to how much I agree or disagree, there's no reason to hedge.

kenan, Friday, 13 March 2009 09:15 (sixteen years ago)

368

cozwn, Friday, 13 March 2009 09:29 (sixteen years ago)

lolz, gave up when I realized my pressing the zero-key = 10 = "Agree More". This qwertyian slip makes it clear that I hate homosexuals.

Øystein, Friday, 13 March 2009 09:40 (sixteen years ago)

380. Lefty crackpot.

Dom Cry For Me, Passantino (NickB), Friday, 13 March 2009 09:47 (sixteen years ago)

quizzes like this are such a bad measure of anything. first question was whether i agreed that the primary aim of corporations is to improve returns for their employees & shareholders, not to improve society (or some such) - i wholeheartedly agree. i just don't think that the primary aim of corporations is something that the govt or society should really take into account that much. but agreeing w/the statement here would make me a conservative.

(apols if this has been covered, haven't read whole thread)

lex pretend, Friday, 13 March 2009 10:48 (sixteen years ago)

293, Canadian.

Millsner, Friday, 13 March 2009 11:00 (sixteen years ago)

No, I totally agreed with that statement and gave it a 10. I don't think that's a conservative opinion, it's the first step in any critique of capitalism.

x-post

Dom Cry For Me, Passantino (NickB), Friday, 13 March 2009 11:01 (sixteen years ago)

the primary aim of corporations is to improve returns for their employees & shareholders

How's that been working out for 'em lately?

John Nash to thread.

M.V., Friday, 13 March 2009 14:12 (sixteen years ago)

higher than average american, lower than average ilxor 240

Anthony, I am not an Alcoholic & Drunk (darraghmac), Friday, 13 March 2009 15:31 (sixteen years ago)

quizzes like this are such a bad measure of anything.

I'm surprised at how seriously so many folks are taking this stupid quiz. It's not science, even political science. The questions most certainly wouldn't pass any 1st year poli sci undergrad's sniff test for usability. It's just a goof, like 100,000 other Internet quizzes, "purity tests", or what have you.

meta pro lols (libcrypt), Friday, 13 March 2009 15:41 (sixteen years ago)

who is taking it seriously

rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Friday, 13 March 2009 15:41 (sixteen years ago)

Shouldn't you be tag-teaming with Lamp?

meta pro lols (libcrypt), Friday, 13 March 2009 15:42 (sixteen years ago)

im not sure what that means

rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Friday, 13 March 2009 15:44 (sixteen years ago)

i want to take a purity test. am not confident of achieving a score of 240 however

Anthony, I am not an Alcoholic & Drunk (darraghmac), Friday, 13 March 2009 15:45 (sixteen years ago)

http://img239.imageshack.us/img239/7425/imageuploadimage.jpg

meta pro lols (libcrypt), Friday, 13 March 2009 15:47 (sixteen years ago)

I was just looking for a band name generator, not anything practical

bacon = bad for the face + magic for the moobs (Mackro Mackro), Friday, 13 March 2009 15:47 (sixteen years ago)

346

Hreidarsson The Storm (Matt DC), Friday, 13 March 2009 15:49 (sixteen years ago)

263

\∫Öζ/.... argh oh noes! (ken c), Friday, 13 March 2009 15:55 (sixteen years ago)

you're all a bunch of liberal nutcases

\∫Öζ/.... argh oh noes! (ken c), Friday, 13 March 2009 15:55 (sixteen years ago)

i think the point is to increase, marginally, the number of ppl who might think of themselves as progressive or be comfortable hearing the term

goole, Friday, 13 March 2009 15:57 (sixteen years ago)

sorry to channel gabbneb for a minute (rip)

goole, Friday, 13 March 2009 15:57 (sixteen years ago)

i think the point is to increase, marginally, the number of ppl who might think of themselves as progressive or be comfortable hearing the term

OTM award for today.

meta pro lols (libcrypt), Friday, 13 March 2009 16:02 (sixteen years ago)

307. someone would make one of these to determine how prog-rock you are.

s1ocrates (some dude), Friday, 13 March 2009 16:03 (sixteen years ago)

My 314 was described as extremely progressive, I think. I self-categorize as a moderate liberal, tho.

meta pro lols (libcrypt), Friday, 13 March 2009 16:04 (sixteen years ago)

I've changed my mind. It's a serious quiz, but only in a meta sense.

meta pro lols (libcrypt), Friday, 13 March 2009 16:07 (sixteen years ago)

i like the one that told me which candidate i should vote for better.

now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Friday, 13 March 2009 16:09 (sixteen years ago)

(1st choice: kucinich; 2nd coice: ron paul. LOLOLOLOL)

now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Friday, 13 March 2009 16:15 (sixteen years ago)

What do you have to answer to have a conservative score, I wonder? Seeing as how so many questions are half-sensical, this could be fun.

kenan, Friday, 13 March 2009 16:16 (sixteen years ago)

i'm going to takle it again and answer as my father would. will report back.

now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Friday, 13 March 2009 16:16 (sixteen years ago)

HALP! What's the conservative answer to the budget deficit question?

kenan, Friday, 13 March 2009 16:18 (sixteen years ago)

someone would make one of these to determine how prog-rock you are.

Hi dere!

Hreidarsson The Storm (Matt DC), Friday, 13 March 2009 16:18 (sixteen years ago)

Except that one is actually crap.

Hreidarsson The Storm (Matt DC), Friday, 13 March 2009 16:19 (sixteen years ago)

HALP! Is it conservative to be isolationist?

Bush has made being conservative harder that it sounds.

kenan, Friday, 13 March 2009 16:22 (sixteen years ago)

i want one for "your passive agressive score"

\∫Öζ/.... argh oh noes! (ken c), Friday, 13 March 2009 16:23 (sixteen years ago)

Bush has made being conservative harder that it sounds.

lol, otm & why gop is (hopefully) wandering in desert for a couple of terms

now is the time to winterize your manscape (will), Friday, 13 March 2009 16:25 (sixteen years ago)

I managed to get my score down to 20, which means I incorrectly unpacked two questions. Going through it again, I see what libcrypt means -- the quiz is loaded heavily to make sure you answer progressively, because the inverse of the "progressive" opinion wouldn't be conservative, it would be straight-up crackers.

kenan, Friday, 13 March 2009 16:34 (sixteen years ago)

I think we should all pour one out for Gabbneb right now.

meta pro lols (libcrypt), Friday, 13 March 2009 16:38 (sixteen years ago)

where's don weiner?

The Screaming Lobster of Challops (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 13 March 2009 16:39 (sixteen years ago)

the o.g. http://www.theadvocates.org/quizp/index.html

bnw, Friday, 13 March 2009 16:42 (sixteen years ago)

HALP! What's the conservative answer to the budget deficit question?

They're bad.

Is that indicative of how far the US is to the right that people don't even know any more? Or just that conservative administrations actually rack up huge deficits despite the ideology.

So, fiscally conservative Democrats are called "Blue Dogs", right?

I got a lefty-Brit 355!

Jamie T Smith, Friday, 13 March 2009 17:31 (sixteen years ago)

Is that indicative of how far the US is to the right that people don't even know any more? Or just that conservative administrations actually rack up huge deficits despite the ideology.

The latter. It was kind of a joke. Although I am genuinely confused about free trade. I know conservatives like it, but I don't understand what's conservative about it.

kenan, Friday, 13 March 2009 17:47 (sixteen years ago)

Ah! Sorry.

Jamie T Smith, Friday, 13 March 2009 17:48 (sixteen years ago)

Although I am genuinely confused about free trade. I know conservatives like it, but I don't understand what's conservative about it.

I know some conservatives that are anti-free trade and anti-NAFTA because of where their money comes from. But the ideological conservative argument in favor of free trade, as I understand it, is that it is a logical extension of capitalism, which should be regulated as little as possible. By regulating trade, one is regulating capitalism and the free market. There is also the social belief that it will improve the lives and societies of the international participants in free trade, and that capitalism and the nice things that it introduces will make the "savages" behave better. To quote Billy Bragg, "they all want what we've got, but they don't know it yet."

what happened? I'm confused. (sarahel), Friday, 13 March 2009 19:18 (sixteen years ago)

Makes sense. I'm all for free trade myself, though I'd leave out the part about "savages."

kenan, Friday, 13 March 2009 19:37 (sixteen years ago)

It seems to me that the "oh noes cultural imperialism" argument is the same as the "corporations have social responsibilities" argument, i.e., irrelevant.

kenan, Friday, 13 March 2009 19:42 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.