http://wave.google.com/
Well then.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:17 (seventeen years ago)
someone remind me why I would ever want to do that
― Obama seems to have the views of a 21-year-old Hispanic girl (HI DERE), Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:22 (seventeen years ago)
Because you must be connected to everything ever at once or else.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:23 (seventeen years ago)
It will revolutionize the way we do something or something else.
― Aimless, Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:23 (seventeen years ago)
it's just a fancy interface for threaded message boards??
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:24 (seventeen years ago)
Some hoohah:
Among other things, Google is counting on outsiders to figure out how to weave Wave into the popular Internet communications service Twitter, social networks like Facebook and existing Web-based e-mail services, said Lars Rasmussen, a Google engineering manager.Rasmussen and his brother, Jens, helped build Google's online mapping service, which sprouted a variety of unforeseen uses after its 2005 debut because of the ingenuity of external programmers.Having learned their lesson from the mapping experience, the Rasmussens wanted to give developers ample time to tinker with their newest creation before unleashing it on the rest of the world.The Rasmussens broke away from Google's mapping service in 2006 to concentrate on building a service that would enable e-mail and instant messaging to embrace the Web's increasingly social nature. They contend e-mail hasn't changed that much since its invention during the 1960s."We started out by saying to ourselves, 'What might e-mail look like if it had been invented today?"' said Lars Rasmussen, who worked on Wave in Australia with his brother and just three other Google employees.
Rasmussen and his brother, Jens, helped build Google's online mapping service, which sprouted a variety of unforeseen uses after its 2005 debut because of the ingenuity of external programmers.
Having learned their lesson from the mapping experience, the Rasmussens wanted to give developers ample time to tinker with their newest creation before unleashing it on the rest of the world.
The Rasmussens broke away from Google's mapping service in 2006 to concentrate on building a service that would enable e-mail and instant messaging to embrace the Web's increasingly social nature. They contend e-mail hasn't changed that much since its invention during the 1960s.
"We started out by saying to ourselves, 'What might e-mail look like if it had been invented today?"' said Lars Rasmussen, who worked on Wave in Australia with his brother and just three other Google employees.
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:24 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.thewave.tk/
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:25 (seventeen years ago)
I hope it will have quizzes, preferably lots of them, because they improve my communication and collaboration on the web.
― dulce est desipere in loco (Euler), Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:25 (seventeen years ago)
also it would be good if my "friends" could read and comment on my spam
plus weird google-y tools---i think they do stuff like this not because they think they are 'cool' and 'trendy' but because they anticipate the user-created data will be trendable in a way that lets them fine tune some search algorithm uniquely suited to 'waves' that they can then license for more serious enterprise applications
xposts
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:27 (seventeen years ago)
okay I like you all v.v. much but you are not fucking collaborating on my emails
― Obama seems to have the views of a 21-year-old Hispanic girl (HI DERE), Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:28 (seventeen years ago)
'hey users generate contextual text for links and images around the web in controlled environment so we can study yr behavior and make the googlebot smarter'
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:29 (seventeen years ago)
they're not your emails, dan, they're collaborative emails made my wave-mates
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:30 (seventeen years ago)
lol by
so... they are like closed collaborative blogs
― Obama seems to have the views of a 21-year-old Hispanic girl (HI DERE), Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:32 (seventeen years ago)
someone at google figured out that messageboards generally put out more signal than facebook groups or whatever, and goggleize it. 'what if you could take only the best parts of that thread about gear's couch and turn it into a youtube video to send to yr coworkers?? meme it up!'
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:32 (seventeen years ago)
what if ilx posts were collaborative
― Mr. Que, Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:33 (seventeen years ago)
iTunes + 4chan/ilx/whatever = waves
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:34 (seventeen years ago)
wavvves
― cool app (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:35 (seventeen years ago)
actually, it's
iTunes + Chicago thread = waves
like that screenshot there is all "BBQ Sunday" and stuff, so i think they're just targeting ppl that hang out on small-fry, local/regional msg boards AND all the gmail users that just keep a tab open at work and bullshit. like, why not do it on this super msg-board that emails and flickrs and isn't called a msg board because that would scare away ppl that don't want to be nerds
― i like to fart and i am crazy (gbx), Thursday, 28 May 2009 19:36 (seventeen years ago)
Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search. Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search. Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search. Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search. Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search. Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search. Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search. Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search. Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search. Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search. Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search. Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search. Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search. Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search. Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search. Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search. Tools called "Searchy" and "Linky" also will allow embedded links and real-time search.
― worm? lol (J0hn D.), Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:11 (seventeen years ago)
I have a comment but maybe it is too mean...
― Hatfail of Hollow (Nicole), Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:15 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.redalkemi.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/linky.jpg
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:16 (seventeen years ago)
ha see, I was so disgusted by the concept of this that I didn't even bother to read for roffles
― Obama seems to have the views of a 21-year-old Hispanic girl (HI DERE), Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:16 (seventeen years ago)
so we can simultaneously edit other people's soccer player photoshops? this seems really productive to me.
― giving a shit when it isn't your turn to give a shit (sarahel), Thursday, 28 May 2009 20:29 (seventeen years ago)
Wait a minute, embedded links??! I have seen the fucking future
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 28 May 2009 23:38 (seventeen years ago)
Real-time search??????
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 28 May 2009 23:39 (seventeen years ago)
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Technology/Pix/pictures/2009/03/23/wired10.jpg
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 28 May 2009 23:41 (seventeen years ago)
Google Wave can make you more productive even when you're having fun.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
― cant go with u too many alfbrees (Abbott), Friday, 29 May 2009 00:12 (seventeen years ago)
Google Wave mod fites could be amusing idea for lolz.
― chk chk BOOM! (Trayce), Friday, 29 May 2009 00:14 (seventeen years ago)
"Google Waves also introduces 'blue writing', in which some text is written in blue, signifying a 'hyperlink'."
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 29 May 2009 00:19 (seventeen years ago)
actually seems a little like this, with extra social-networking fairy dust -
http://pipes.yahoo.com/pipes/
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 29 May 2009 00:27 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah WTF isnt this just Google Groups? (which is just Usenet anyway)
― chk chk BOOM! (Trayce), Friday, 29 May 2009 00:27 (seventeen years ago)
Well, Google Groups with added "lol I drew a penis on your powerpoint presentation hahahaha" value.
― chk chk BOOM! (Trayce), Friday, 29 May 2009 00:28 (seventeen years ago)
that searchy and linky shit puts me in mind ofhttp://img19.imageshack.us/img19/4949/y31ea68ug4k3.jpg
― A B C, Friday, 29 May 2009 00:32 (seventeen years ago)
Actually it made me think of:
http://koti.mbnet.fi/mupelo/springy.gif
― chk chk BOOM! (Trayce), Friday, 29 May 2009 00:32 (seventeen years ago)
^^lol
― S Wine Floozie (SeekAltRoute), Friday, 29 May 2009 01:24 (seventeen years ago)
i think this is going to be awesome
― s1ocki, Friday, 29 May 2009 01:25 (seventeen years ago)
actually i have no idea what this is supposed to be, but i thought i'd balance out against the kneejerk skepticism.
― s1ocki, Friday, 29 May 2009 01:26 (seventeen years ago)
can i use google link on my amazon kindle
― harbl, Friday, 29 May 2009 01:35 (seventeen years ago)
i mean google *wave*
ahoy dere
― 鬼の手 (Edward III), Friday, 29 May 2009 01:39 (seventeen years ago)
I have to say, if it does end up being kind of like a forum/BB/newsgroup sort of thing but with added web2.0 kind of tech, it could have some interesting potential.
Hmmm... collab porn anyone?
― chk chk BOOM! (Trayce), Friday, 29 May 2009 01:44 (seventeen years ago)
if this is more than 6000x less annoying than letmegooglethatforyou.com then i may investigate, but 6000 is i stress my lower limit
― sad blue nose hybrid with shit football crew (country matters), Friday, 29 May 2009 01:49 (seventeen years ago)
I was looking at the developer stuff, might not be hard to add a "bookmarked ilx thread" component to it.
― mh, Friday, 29 May 2009 13:36 (seventeen years ago)
i really do think this is gonna be awesome.
― man saves ducklings from (ledge), Friday, 29 May 2009 13:39 (seventeen years ago)
I still want to know what Nicole's mean comment was!
― Obama seems to have the views of a 21-year-old Hispanic girl (HI DERE), Friday, 29 May 2009 13:40 (seventeen years ago)
and yeah it is a bit like yahoo pipes or microsoft popfly, but a) already built for you and ii) by a company big and good enough to maybe actually get it right and make it popular - like how ajax only really took off after gmail.
― man saves ducklings from (ledge), Friday, 29 May 2009 13:42 (seventeen years ago)
this is gonna be web 4.0, people.
― man saves ducklings from (ledge), Friday, 29 May 2009 13:43 (seventeen years ago)
I've got a similarly positive attitude about it. Of course it's just as likely this will become nothing, but it seems like a good way to introduce things like wiki-style editing to email conversations. Sometimes it feels weird that for most of my friends - who have no idea RSS or Google Reader is, don't really read message boards, don't give a damn about Twitter (that includes me) etc. - these clunky old email chains are what they use most of the time, and Gmail conversation threads are the biggest advance there is, in convenience and usability advances. Ledge's comment about Gmail/Ajax otm.
― Nhex, Friday, 29 May 2009 13:51 (seventeen years ago)
were already doing this over at i love cricket btw
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Friday, 29 May 2009 14:00 (seventeen years ago)
we just dont call it the "wave" we call it "i love cricket"
should change the name to i wave cricket
― s1ocki, Friday, 29 May 2009 14:14 (seventeen years ago)
nah
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Friday, 29 May 2009 14:15 (seventeen years ago)
actually i really think you should... if you don't i might ask a mod
― s1ocki, Friday, 29 May 2009 14:28 (seventeen years ago)
tattletale^^^
― Mr. Que, Friday, 29 May 2009 14:29 (seventeen years ago)
the collaborative nature of i love cricket is such that i could do nothing
― rip dom passantino 3/5/09 never forget (max), Friday, 29 May 2009 14:29 (seventeen years ago)
can't be a great system in that case
― s1ocki, Friday, 29 May 2009 19:15 (seventeen years ago)
I think this is about Google bullying/forcing MS into doing HTML 5 and effectively forcing control (of a sort) of a delivery platform for applications.
― Keith, Friday, 29 May 2009 19:18 (seventeen years ago)
haha see I can get behind this ^^^
― Obama seems to have the views of a 21-year-old Hispanic girl (HI DERE), Friday, 29 May 2009 19:18 (seventeen years ago)
I'm pretty interested in this too. It feels a bit like threads for small groups of friends -- like little ILX boards you can make on the fly
― stet, Friday, 29 May 2009 22:05 (seventeen years ago)
so wait, is this like google facebook or something?
― Feugh! (since somebody always asks: rhymes with "Peugh!") (forksclovetofu), Friday, 29 May 2009 22:09 (seventeen years ago)
it's a bit of it -- the friends and commenting -- and a bit of email and a bit of IM and a bit of picture sharing. Hard to pigeonhole right now
― stet, Saturday, 30 May 2009 00:00 (seventeen years ago)
It's kind of a pluggable architecture for everything. Like a facebook conversation could be a wave if facebook lets the apis intermingle, or facebook could be an interface for wave content. It's creating a framework for interaction, whether it's phased or realtime, and letting others either contribute their content or offering up what you create on the Google side to others.
― mh, Saturday, 30 May 2009 02:25 (seventeen years ago)
I quite like the idea. I've used facebook to try and hold multi-person discussions to arrange holiday type events and it works OK, but Wave looks like it could be a nice answer to this kind of thing.
― krakow, Saturday, 30 May 2009 07:20 (seventeen years ago)
Wave is electricity, not illumination. It’s “communication” and not any one specific way of communicating anything to anybody.
― scott seaward (G00blar), Tuesday, 9 June 2009 09:06 (sixteen years ago)
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/resources/2007/07/ai72kspmed.jpg
― scott seaward (G00blar), Tuesday, 9 June 2009 09:07 (sixteen years ago)
Thrill. Or not.
A version of Wave for the iPhone and Android mobile system is accessible (see image at right), but most of it is broken.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/.a/6a00d8341c630a53ef0115715750f3970c-800wi
― Ned Raggett, Friday, 31 July 2009 22:31 (sixteen years ago)
wave is taking a little while to load
― http://tinyurl.com/npaahw (s1ocki), Friday, 31 July 2009 22:35 (sixteen years ago)
wave is awesome i want to have a go
― Jarlrmai, Friday, 31 July 2009 22:39 (sixteen years ago)
Beta testing available:
https://services.google.com/fb/forms/wavesignup/
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:27 (sixteen years ago)
"communication and collaboration"
*nods off*
― Great Scott! It's Molecular Man. (Ste), Wednesday, 30 September 2009 16:40 (sixteen years ago)
Anyone actually got an invite yet, then?
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 1 October 2009 05:33 (sixteen years ago)
i spoke to a google friend earlier, gonna get an invite later today...
― jabba hands, Thursday, 1 October 2009 05:55 (sixteen years ago)
http://fourfour.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451b8c369e201127980c74f28a4-800wi
― When two tribes go to war, he always gets picked last (James Morrison), Thursday, 1 October 2009 06:08 (sixteen years ago)
Argh, wrong thread!
No invite here ;(
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 1 October 2009 07:41 (sixteen years ago)
I still don't get what this...does
― iatee, Thursday, 1 October 2009 07:44 (sixteen years ago)
i'm in. got a few invites left if ppl are interested?
― jabba hands, Thursday, 1 October 2009 07:47 (sixteen years ago)
Yes please.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 1 October 2009 07:49 (sixteen years ago)
pm me yr gmail
― jabba hands, Thursday, 1 October 2009 07:49 (sixteen years ago)
Me-too, here.
― Cunga, Thursday, 1 October 2009 07:50 (sixteen years ago)
PM sent. Cheers.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 1 October 2009 07:52 (sixteen years ago)
done and done....it says it'll take a little while for the invitations to come thru.
― jabba hands, Thursday, 1 October 2009 07:59 (sixteen years ago)
thanks
― Cunga, Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:25 (sixteen years ago)
Prepare to be, like, revolutionized and stuff.
― Aimless, Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:34 (sixteen years ago)
LA Times claiming it will save journalism, sorta
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:46 (sixteen years ago)
I think this is exactly the right thread!
― a misunderstanding of Hip-Hop and contracts (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 October 2009 16:50 (sixteen years ago)
I'm also interested in any spare invites anyone's got.
― Fetchboy, Thursday, 1 October 2009 17:00 (sixteen years ago)
I would love an invite if someone could spare ....
― etaeoe, Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:00 (sixteen years ago)
me 3
― gore vitalic (s1ocki), Thursday, 1 October 2009 18:44 (sixteen years ago)
might as well get in early if i can?
― treyf shrimpz (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 1 October 2009 20:30 (sixteen years ago)
me 4! hook it up! :)
― mikebee (BATTAGS), Thursday, 1 October 2009 22:52 (sixteen years ago)
Not received any email from Google yet, anyone else?
― James Mitchell, Saturday, 3 October 2009 12:03 (sixteen years ago)
huh...mine took a day or two to come thru. when i sent yours the message said they review all the invitations manually (???) so i guess that's the delay.
― jabba hands, Saturday, 3 October 2009 12:19 (sixteen years ago)
Thought that would be case. Thanks again.
― James Mitchell, Saturday, 3 October 2009 13:10 (sixteen years ago)
I am boycotting this just because they decided that extensions should be called "robots." That's stupid and confusing and why?
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Saturday, 3 October 2009 13:24 (sixteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WT1LXhgXPWs
― gore vitalic (s1ocki), Saturday, 3 October 2009 14:45 (sixteen years ago)
I offer free support for life to anyone who HOOKS ME UP with an invite
― Jarlrmai, Saturday, 3 October 2009 14:56 (sixteen years ago)
i still don't completely get what it is i tried watching that video but it seemed like an snl steve jobs parody sketch or something.
― tehresa, Saturday, 3 October 2009 15:22 (sixteen years ago)
I don't get why it's such a significant development either, but then I thought twitter would never take off on a large scale.
― Bob Six, Saturday, 3 October 2009 15:23 (sixteen years ago)
I haven't received mine yet either, so don't worry. The Google worker elves are still whistling while they work on our invites, I'm sure.
― Cunga, Saturday, 3 October 2009 23:01 (sixteen years ago)
I am boycotting this just because they decided that extensions should be called "robots." That's stupid and confusing and why)
Extensions are called extensions, tho. Robots actually take part in the wave.
― stet, Sunday, 4 October 2009 09:18 (sixteen years ago)
http://sharkrobot.com/store/images/shirt_ninjabot_surfbot.jpg
― gore vitalic (s1ocki), Sunday, 4 October 2009 15:13 (sixteen years ago)
Right, I'm in. Now what?
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 6 October 2009 06:38 (sixteen years ago)
I just got my invite as well. My excitement is only overpowered by my confusion of how to do anything. Is this what the internet feels like for old folk?
― Cunga, Tuesday, 6 October 2009 07:04 (sixteen years ago)
Does it automatically add people from your contacts? Because I have no friends apart from jabba hands.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 6 October 2009 07:11 (sixteen years ago)
I think it only considers people who also have the Wave, as I'm in the same boat.
― Cunga, Tuesday, 6 October 2009 07:19 (sixteen years ago)
You can add a search and include the modifier "with:public" to bring up public stuff.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 6 October 2009 08:13 (sixteen years ago)
You can add a search and include the modifier "with:public" to bring up public stuff. --James Mitchell
Woah!
― stet, Tuesday, 6 October 2009 14:54 (sixteen years ago)
Found anything good?
I basically can't run this on my antiquated work PC ;_;
― this must be what FAIL is really like (ledge), Tuesday, 6 October 2009 15:25 (sixteen years ago)
This was exactly my reaction at 9:12 AM.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 6 October 2009 15:43 (sixteen years ago)
Maybe one of us should start a public ILX wave...
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 6 October 2009 15:44 (sixteen years ago)
I wanna try it
― butt sound insanity (gbx), Tuesday, 6 October 2009 15:47 (sixteen years ago)
wat
― canadian teen queen (wanko ergo sum), Tuesday, 6 October 2009 15:53 (sixteen years ago)
pretty ropey with large waves even on my not-at-all antiquated home PC.
― this must be what FAIL is really like (ledge), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 08:50 (sixteen years ago)
Got my invite this morning - is Pete Brown the guy on this thread who I IM'd for an invite? If so, thanks!
― nate woolls, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 09:03 (sixteen years ago)
is this fucked for anyone else now?
― this must be what FAIL is really like (ledge), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:25 (sixteen years ago)
i don't understand
― elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:30 (sixteen years ago)
It fucked up a little bit earlier - inbox was showing lots and lots of mails but nothing in the preview pane - but seems ok now.
Still don't know what to do with it though.
― nate woolls, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:30 (sixteen years ago)
what is it and why do people want it
can someone break it down for me
― elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:31 (sixteen years ago)
I wish I knew, I've got it but I don't know what to do with it. Anybody on this thread actually made a wave, or whatever they're called?
― nate woolls, Wednesday, 7 October 2009 18:32 (sixteen years ago)
I can't see anything in my inbox at the mo. Or even the icon for it, or trash, or any other of the built-in folders. Can still search for public waves, but can't find ones I've started. If someone else wants to start a pulic ILX one... to make it public apparently you have to add the pub✧✧✧@✧.gw✧✧✧.c✧✧ contact and invite it to the wave.
Elmo it's a bit like rich-text collaborative email/IM. A wave is a bit like a thread, people can reply or edit the original, all edits are saved and can be replayed in order, pics, movies etc can be embedded, there are gadgety things and bots...
― this must be what FAIL is really like (ledge), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:51 (sixteen years ago)
public at gwave dot com
public at a.gwave.com actually
― this must be what FAIL is really like (ledge), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:56 (sixteen years ago)
ok i made one but it's not turning up in a search yet.
― this must be what FAIL is really like (ledge), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 19:58 (sixteen years ago)
'tis now.
― this must be what FAIL is really like (ledge), Wednesday, 7 October 2009 20:42 (sixteen years ago)
just got my invite. so far kinda bored/lonely on this thing.
― akaky akakievich, Friday, 9 October 2009 17:20 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, it's pretty pointless on your own. There's an ILX thread wave where you can at least see how it works. Looking forward to getting some invites to give to people I can actually 'work' with.
― j.o.n.a, Friday, 9 October 2009 19:28 (sixteen years ago)
why can't i figure out how to post a picture in a wave? i see no "paperclip" icon in the compose toolbar...
― akaky akakievich, Friday, 9 October 2009 21:26 (sixteen years ago)
errr, turns out i had to make my browser window bigger. annoying that you can't see the whole toolbar.....
― akaky akakievich, Friday, 9 October 2009 21:29 (sixteen years ago)
Anyone who might be able & willing to invite me? I'm interested to give this a try. Thanks.
― krakow, Sunday, 11 October 2009 22:23 (sixteen years ago)
thank you "p3te br0wn"!
as far as i can tell this is "reply to all" with google branding
― Tracer Hand, Monday, 12 October 2009 08:06 (sixteen years ago)
plus proper threading plus rich text plus collaboration...
annoying that you can't see the whole toolbar.....
collapsing nav + contact panes gives you a bunch more space. unfortunately it doesn't remember your layout settings between sessions. yet.
― surfing on hokusine waves (ledge), Monday, 12 October 2009 09:57 (sixteen years ago)
does anyone have a spare invite?
― bare grills (tpp), Monday, 12 October 2009 10:06 (sixteen years ago)
^^ This. Mainly coz I still don't understand what the fuck this is.
― CosMc (Raw Patrick), Monday, 12 October 2009 12:21 (sixteen years ago)
Who is chessing with me btw? hurry it up.
― surfing on hokusine waves (ledge), Monday, 12 October 2009 13:50 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/10/12/google-wave-and-the-dawn-of-passive-aggressive-communication/
And I would still love an invite at forksclovetofu at gmail if you got one.
― "Keep Tweeting", Raged Roger The Kindly Hippopotamus. (forksclovetofu), Monday, 12 October 2009 21:27 (sixteen years ago)
Ooooh, just got this working ON IPHONE.
― JimD, Tuesday, 13 October 2009 10:32 (sixteen years ago)
At the moment using Google Wave is a bit like being a football scout. But one that has to get up at 8am on a Sunday to go and watch an Under 12's football match in driving rain. It's far too early, the conditions are uncertain and you're asking yourself exactly what you're doing there. But the potential for greatness is present.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 13 October 2009 13:18 (sixteen years ago)
I have a friend that works at Google, and he's one of the friendliest, most openhearted and outgoing people I have ever known. But anytime I ask him what he's been working on he completely shuts off and refuses to say anything. Do they make their employees all sign confidentiality wavers or something? Kind of ironic seeing as how they freely manage the data for everyone in the world often without even asking.
― Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 13 October 2009 14:53 (sixteen years ago)
http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/7485/36106934.jpg
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 14 October 2009 15:39 (sixteen years ago)
Farhad Manjoo thinks it's too complicated.
― M. Grissom/DeShields (jaymc), Wednesday, 14 October 2009 15:48 (sixteen years ago)
dullard.
it could do with draft (no live typing) mode tho. and thread collapsing.
― surfing on hokusine waves (ledge), Wednesday, 14 October 2009 15:51 (sixteen years ago)
His point against live typing seems valid, I've experienced the same paralysis myself. But a) I can also agonise for too long over a normal chat; and ii) people do ok at live speaking, perhaps live typing will be a quickly learned skill.
― surfing on hokusine waves (ledge), Wednesday, 14 October 2009 15:57 (sixteen years ago)
In the launch video, they said there was a setting to turn off live typing. much needed imo
― stet, Wednesday, 14 October 2009 16:59 (sixteen years ago)
OMG @ WaveNES
― etaeoe, Wednesday, 14 October 2009 17:12 (sixteen years ago)
OK, I've got a Gwave account. Now what?
― Elvis Telecom, Saturday, 17 October 2009 22:31 (sixteen years ago)
Conquer the world.
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 17 October 2009 23:28 (sixteen years ago)
Send us all invites. Party ensues.
― krakow, Sunday, 18 October 2009 22:01 (sixteen years ago)
I really don't think this will ever become that popular. Even though a lot of people are using social networking sites for a lot of communication nowadays, I still don't see email going away as the dominant digital medium for a really long time. Especially since most websites that make a user log in require you to have an email address.
― kshighway1, Sunday, 18 October 2009 22:30 (sixteen years ago)
I don't think it's going to replace email, it's really a different tool all together. As far as I can see its benefit is in its collaborative nature, so when it comes to, say making agendas for meetings, writing documents and the like it might come into its own.
Really though, it's just like a turbocharged wiki.
― scotstvo, Sunday, 18 October 2009 22:33 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, you're right. I can imagine people using it when they're working on projects together, but even then I still think Wave comes off like a solution looking for a problem.
― kshighway1, Sunday, 18 October 2009 22:38 (sixteen years ago)
i want an invite tbh
― e\m/ily (roxymuzak), Monday, 19 October 2009 03:44 (sixteen years ago)
Gabbo! Gabbo! Gabbo! Google Wave! Gabbo! Gabbo! Gabbo! Gabbo!
― Aimless, Monday, 19 October 2009 03:57 (sixteen years ago)
it seems like the question is really how many platforms any one person wants or needs -- and also, how do you get near-universal buy-in, which is what you need to make any particular platform as useful as old-fashioned phone lines and postal service were. if there are a bunch of good competing platforms and the people i want to communicate with socially or professionally are split among 5 or 6 different ones, that's a pain in the ass. i assume google's looking for a category killer here, but the category is already awfully crowded. (of course so was the search engine category when google came along, so i can understand them not being deterred. but still.)
― flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Monday, 19 October 2009 04:12 (sixteen years ago)
(i know, they don't want to kill the category, they want to evolve it. but i mean, my ability to communicate with a zillion different people at the push of a button already far exceeds my need or desire to do so.)
― flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Monday, 19 October 2009 04:14 (sixteen years ago)
when does ilx 4.0 based on dominant google wave platform launch - should i make mod request
― ice cr?m, Monday, 19 October 2009 04:20 (sixteen years ago)
ok after letting my mind wave on this shit for 4 mins ive come to the conclusion that wave is googles facebook killer for when social networking transforms from websites into ghostly apis that follow u around the internets broadcasting and receiving dat abt u n yr friends
― ice cr?m, Monday, 19 October 2009 04:34 (sixteen years ago)
i think yr maybe right, but that makes it sound irritating. the problem even with existing networks is that most of the time most people aren't really all that interested in what most other people are doing. so continually pushing toward more real-time information is possibly the wrong move, imo.
but it's possible that google's thing turns out to have applications other than what they intend, and what they intend is nebulous enough to start with.
― flying squid attack (tipsy mothra), Monday, 19 October 2009 04:42 (sixteen years ago)
http://i35.tinypic.com/2dakhsy.jpg
― ice cr?m, Monday, 19 October 2009 04:43 (sixteen years ago)
when social networking transforms from websites into ghostly apis that follow u around the internets world - what w/all this foursquare type gps shits
― ice cr?m, Monday, 19 October 2009 04:54 (sixteen years ago)
my iphone is telling me there is stuff i want in this store
― ice cr?m, Monday, 19 October 2009 04:55 (sixteen years ago)
how do i get an invite
― Bobby Wo (max), Monday, 19 October 2009 04:57 (sixteen years ago)
ill trade a wen invite for a wave invite
dude wen got bought by google its wave widget robot now sry
― ice cr?m, Monday, 19 October 2009 05:03 (sixteen years ago)
I just got this shit and it looks like a forum killerthat's jsut after looking at it for like a minute tho
― nice email (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 13 November 2009 22:13 (sixteen years ago)
I just my invite but I'm not sure wtf it is. At least it doesn't have Farmville yet.
― Yah Kid A (Euler), Sunday, 15 November 2009 09:55 (sixteen years ago)
I just got my invite today...a bit lost as to what to do though...
― musically, Sunday, 15 November 2009 10:52 (sixteen years ago)
I sent a "wave" to my one other "contact" with this. It seems like it was an email. I should probably watch the intro movie. Maybe I could have embedded a movie or something.
― Yah Kid A (Euler), Sunday, 15 November 2009 10:55 (sixteen years ago)
The problem with the Wave rollout is that you need a lot of contacts in order to make an interesting or useful Wave, and I've only got s few contacts on there. This type of rollout worked for GMail because you could still interact with all the email addresses that you already had, but I think with Wave people are going to be sick of logging in on the the off-chance that something has happened--and it hasn't--that they're going to give up on it before seeing what it can actually do.
If it can actually do anything.
― Disco Stfu (Raw Patrick), Sunday, 15 November 2009 12:42 (sixteen years ago)
Yeh: I've watched my Wave contacts increase from four to about 20 in the past week but *every single wave* is just the new dudes coming on and going: "Hang on, what the fuck's the point of this?"
As someone sagely described it the other day: it's a solution desperately looking for a problem.
Editing other people's posts to say "I AM A COCK" was mildly amusing for five seconds, mind.
― What do you want? This ain't an egg shop (grimly fiendish), Sunday, 15 November 2009 13:36 (sixteen years ago)
I know I'm a nasty skeptic, but I'll need to see more than two people on a wave, in action, before I decide that this is more than just a way for Google to monopolize every pixel of my screen real estate. Because right now, it just looks like Google World (TM).
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Tuesday, 17 November 2009 09:11 (sixteen years ago)
it's a solution desperately looking for a problem.
Well put. Unless the problem is that Google isn't your entire computer OS. In which case that's the one imaginary problem that it doesn't solve.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Tuesday, 17 November 2009 09:17 (sixteen years ago)
I see what it does, but remain unclear on the concept. If it's for facilitating integrated chat and file-sharing and threaded discussion for people who have no other means of going about this, that's... no one. If it's for people who haven't figured out how to do this with their own machines, that set only includes people who don't much care.
Too little, too early? Too much, too late? Something is wrong here in a basic way.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Tuesday, 17 November 2009 09:25 (sixteen years ago)
At least it doesn't have Farmville yet.
Comment of the year nominee.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Tuesday, 17 November 2009 09:38 (sixteen years ago)
*every single wave* is just the new dudes coming on and going: "Hang on, what the fuck's the point of this?"
haha yes, that's what all of my "waves" (uggh) have been like too.
― Yah Kid A (Euler), Tuesday, 17 November 2009 09:43 (sixteen years ago)
I have not yet seen all of this in action on a Google phone, though. THAT could well be the all-important point that I am missing. Boy, do I look like an old fuddy-duddy, with my desktop machine.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Tuesday, 17 November 2009 09:54 (sixteen years ago)
There should be a thread about the phenomenon of standing around and watching other people hold their iPhone in front of you. It's weird, but only to think about later.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Tuesday, 17 November 2009 09:58 (sixteen years ago)
Done.
― tie me up, dress in drag, and read to me from the bible (kenan), Tuesday, 17 November 2009 10:02 (sixteen years ago)
Wave comes off like a solution looking for a problem
Having just got this it seems like Wave is the problem that Wave comes off feeling like a solution to.
― 'virgin' should be 'wizard' (GamalielRatsey), Monday, 23 November 2009 15:38 (sixteen years ago)
having surfed the wave for a few weeeks now, i gotta say i think this whole venture is a big stinky DUD.
― akaky akakievich, Thursday, 26 November 2009 20:47 (sixteen years ago)
I keep forgetting its there. And most of my other fora and online places will ping me with emails to remind me of new activity. Wave doesnt, which I find very odd considering it should be tied to my gmail account. "X has started a new wave" would be useful. Even better - integrate it into google login so it can appear on the gmail page with a notification maybe? I'm not gonna leave wave running all day long just in case someone sends me a lolcat.
― hulk would smash (Trayce), Thursday, 26 November 2009 21:03 (sixteen years ago)
It's pretty messy. I mean, I'm pretty messy, so maybe it just caters to my super-disorganised skills, but you get a few people editing and discussing a document and come back a few hours later and it's like ARGH MY BRANE!
Plus it runs super slow on the computers at work.
That said, I'm making it a repository for a few things (quotes for a project, collapsible notes underneath). Thread of music clips for me and my brothers.
But on the whole it's a mess, waves don't really know whether they are conversations, threads, or wikis and as a consequence quickly reduce in coherence. Everyone participating needs to have quite a clear idea of where things need to go or it's going to go everywhere at once, like when I try to poach an egg.
― 'virgin' should be 'wizard' (GamalielRatsey), Thursday, 26 November 2009 21:04 (sixteen years ago)
All ive done with this thing so far is chat to people with embedded youtubes and drawings of boobs.
― hulk would smash (Trayce), Thursday, 26 November 2009 21:05 (sixteen years ago)
under the paving stones, the internet
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 26 November 2009 21:09 (sixteen years ago)
Finally tried it with my team at work. It was like an AIM chat room with attachments and emails added in. Sounds like a fun idea if you work at a startup or whatever where you can brainstorm (like, uh, Google) but we abandoned it after all I did was post gifs of thumbs up.
― throwbookatface (skygreenleopard), Friday, 27 November 2009 04:25 (sixteen years ago)
thinkin this will go the way of orkut or picasa
― ♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Friday, 27 November 2009 04:30 (sixteen years ago)
lol orkut
― itdn put butt in the display name (gbx), Friday, 27 November 2009 04:31 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah me and bf had a thread going and it just devolved into penis MS paint lol drawings :/
― hulk would smash (Trayce), Friday, 27 November 2009 04:33 (sixteen years ago)
And its so slow and so confusing! And half the stuff doesnt seem to work for me in FF, apparently you need some kind of add-on?
http://gears.google.com/ , to enable drag n drop.
― George Mucus (ledge), Friday, 27 November 2009 09:22 (sixteen years ago)
Gears, that was it. But I mean - what sort of new thingy requires a special plugin like this. That seems counter-intuitive.
― hulk would smash (Trayce), Friday, 27 November 2009 09:51 (sixteen years ago)
wave doesn't really require it. gears came first after all, and its drag n drop functionality works in other things too, e.g. webmail.
― George Mucus (ledge), Friday, 27 November 2009 10:23 (sixteen years ago)
seems like it could be useful as a collaboration tool for doin work - everyone wants to not have to deal w/1mx emails a day - problem is email is just so easy
― ice cr?m, Saturday, 28 November 2009 18:00 (sixteen years ago)
so i have this now... no idea what to do.
― tehresa, Sunday, 29 November 2009 02:50 (sixteen years ago)
1p2 collage day imo
― afa the i can c (roxymuzak), Sunday, 29 November 2009 03:22 (sixteen years ago)
haha "1p2" - that must be the pato era
how do i shot adding youse.
― hulk would smash (Trayce), Sunday, 29 November 2009 03:27 (sixteen years ago)
ridiculous that you need to add a contact to have inline images! also this is buggy as hell
― Nhex, Sunday, 29 November 2009 03:29 (sixteen years ago)
i have no idea how anything works on this yet, so
― afa the i can c (roxymuzak), Sunday, 29 November 2009 03:39 (sixteen years ago)
srsly rite. So confusing.
― hulk would smash (Trayce), Sunday, 29 November 2009 04:32 (sixteen years ago)
I just got this too and so far cannot think of why I'd want to use it for anything.
― Colonel Poo, Sunday, 29 November 2009 16:15 (sixteen years ago)
yep, though here's what they recommend you check outhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_UyVmITiYQ
― ilx mooncup (forksclovetofu), Sunday, 29 November 2009 17:08 (sixteen years ago)
Sounds like ILX to me.
― Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Sunday, 29 November 2009 18:43 (sixteen years ago)
i still don't know what google wave is :(
― fantastic mr. forks (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 29 November 2009 18:46 (sixteen years ago)
That hour and twenty minute video is a tad on the long side, is it not? Has anyone watched the whole thing? I think this may be a job for John Justen and Fluffy Bear.
― Of course I want frosting. I'm a Scorpio. (kenan), Sunday, 29 November 2009 18:54 (sixteen years ago)
I sent my dad an invite, and he watched the whole hour twenty, apparently. Then he tried waving me some photos and they failed for no apparent reason, and we've both kind of given up on it since then.
― JimD, Sunday, 29 November 2009 18:58 (sixteen years ago)
got it. don't get it.
― akm, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 08:17 (sixteen years ago)
I've used it, and even I'm still not really sure.
― adamj, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 10:09 (sixteen years ago)
i have a google wave
― max, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 15:30 (sixteen years ago)
watchin my contact list grow
― plaxico (I know, right?), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 18:10 (sixteen years ago)
watching the number of waves i get saying 'how do i work this? what is it for?' grow
― stet, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 18:26 (sixteen years ago)
the only person i have "waved" is roxy 4 some reason
― plaxico (I know, right?), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:20 (sixteen years ago)
Nobody's around to wave.
― The Devil's Avocado (Gukbe), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)
i waved a bunch of people this morning and no one has waved back
― max, Wednesday, 2 December 2009 20:20 (sixteen years ago)
*waves*
― usa today star in the hood (jergins), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:00 (sixteen years ago)
trayce at gmail if anyone wants to start some lols (if i remember to look)
― hulk would smash (Trayce), Wednesday, 2 December 2009 21:02 (sixteen years ago)
Got it. Have one contact. Sending you a wave Trayce.
― ljubljana, Thursday, 3 December 2009 04:56 (sixteen years ago)
I dont tihnk it worked! Do people have to be in your mail contacts list or someting?
― millivanillimillenary (Trayce), Thursday, 3 December 2009 05:29 (sixteen years ago)
That helps.
― Of course I want frosting. I'm a Scorpio. (kenan), Thursday, 3 December 2009 05:32 (sixteen years ago)
ok, sent you an email to see if that helped...
― ljubljana, Thursday, 3 December 2009 12:21 (sixteen years ago)
can someone invite me plz
― mage pit laceration (gbx), Tuesday, 19 January 2010 13:59 (sixteen years ago)
kinda want to see how this works in an academic environment
not well ime
have no invites tho
― caek, Tuesday, 19 January 2010 14:00 (sixteen years ago)
we're kinda looking for a one-stop solution for
-file hosting (handouts, lecture vids, etc)-wiki note coop (already got one that's pretty popular but doesn't get edited enough)-discussion/forum-calendar
― mage pit laceration (gbx), Tuesday, 19 January 2010 14:03 (sixteen years ago)
as it is everything's spread out over several different sites, including two janky education-specific sites (blackboard and moodle). i wanna be able to DL a .zip of ALL our lecture materials from the same place i read the wiki etc
― mage pit laceration (gbx), Tuesday, 19 January 2010 14:04 (sixteen years ago)
I have invites to give out, where should I send them?
― nate woolls, Tuesday, 19 January 2010 14:11 (sixteen years ago)
Wave's pretty good for the note coop stuff, and I think it works well as a discussion board (after the obligatory editing each other's posts when you get started). Annoyingly it doesn't have the standard google links along the top for mail/calendar/docs etc. You can attach files up to 8MB I think, although it's been a bit weird when I've tried to add stuff, you can never tell if it's worked properly or not.I have invites too if anyone wants, webmail me an email address.
― useless chamber, Tuesday, 19 January 2010 14:18 (sixteen years ago)
me too - invites at the ready - webmail
― Jblujlama (ljubljana), Wednesday, 20 January 2010 02:06 (sixteen years ago)
~~~~~~~~~~google wave~~~~~~~~~~
― supra-max (ice cr?m), Wednesday, 20 January 2010 02:09 (sixteen years ago)
v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
WMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWMWM
nunununununununununununununununununununununu
― pithfork (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 20 January 2010 02:19 (sixteen years ago)
will invite anyone who wants imo
― plaxico (I know, right?), Wednesday, 20 January 2010 02:59 (sixteen years ago)
1 updated wave in your inbox
Google Wave RIP
― I don't want to go into my newt details (ledge), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 09:18 (sixteen years ago)
Only use I've seen of Wave in ages: http://smarterware.org/6021/live-from-google-io-waving-wednesdays-keynote
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 19 May 2010 09:29 (sixteen years ago)
Really a suprising misstep on Google's behalf, this was.
― demiurge overkill (Trayce), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 10:33 (sixteen years ago)
Not really. I's certainly not a cash cow for the company, but it wasn't meant to be. It seems the project was more about developing the tech than doing anything specific with it. So, mission accomplished.
They're Google. They can throw shit at the wall and see what sticks. It's an enviable luxury.
― Eighteen straight. I think that's a record. (kenan), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 10:37 (sixteen years ago)
Hell, I'm using their browser right now. The surprising misstep was the way they launched Buzz.
― Eighteen straight. I think that's a record. (kenan), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 10:42 (sixteen years ago)
True dat (if you mean the privacy snafu). THo they fucked up on that account AGAIN with the street view wifi "oops we accidentally snagged some of yr open network info, sorry!" thing the other day, yeesh. At least theyre transperant about it all unlike FB.
― demiurge overkill (Trayce), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 10:50 (sixteen years ago)
i've still no idea wtf this even was
― long time listener, first time balla (history mayne), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 10:54 (sixteen years ago)
I've used it and I haven't a clue!
― demiurge overkill (Trayce), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 10:56 (sixteen years ago)
not rly sure what 'google buzz' is either
― long time listener, first time balla (history mayne), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 11:00 (sixteen years ago)
Isn't just like facebook status updates but for gmail?
― Fetchboy, Wednesday, 19 May 2010 11:09 (sixteen years ago)
With a couple of bells and whistles, but basically yes.
― Eighteen straight. I think that's a record. (kenan), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 11:52 (sixteen years ago)
It's a damn shame that Google lost people's trust over privacy right out of the gate with Buzz, because a lot of Facebook users are looking for somewhere else to go right now, because fuck Zuckerberg with an entire fireplace set, but there's nowhere to go, really.
― Eighteen straight. I think that's a record. (kenan), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 11:55 (sixteen years ago)
I love buzz.
― Jeff, Wednesday, 19 May 2010 11:57 (sixteen years ago)
Yes. And you prefer American yogurt. I don't trust you, either.
:)
― Eighteen straight. I think that's a record. (kenan), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 11:57 (sixteen years ago)
No, TBH, the only time I have interacted with Buzz is to jump through the flaming hoops that were (are?) require to turn the thing off. Every I know who uses it thinks it's the kitten's tits, though.
― Eighteen straight. I think that's a record. (kenan), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 12:02 (sixteen years ago)
(That's good.)
(Please read my last post as if I had proofread it myself, k thnx.)
― Eighteen straight. I think that's a record. (kenan), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 12:04 (sixteen years ago)
Kenan otm about facebook and buzz.
Am really getting into Wave at work now. Is great for shared budgets and docs etc.
― stet, Wednesday, 19 May 2010 12:58 (sixteen years ago)
i used wave once to plan a roast beef dinner
― NUDE. MAYNE. (s1ocki), Wednesday, 19 May 2010 14:24 (sixteen years ago)
Fin.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 4 August 2010 21:23 (fifteen years ago)
phew now they have more time to concentrate on google buzz and orkut.
― _▂▅▇█▓▒░◕‿‿◕░▒▓█▇▅▂_ (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 4 August 2010 21:37 (fifteen years ago)
It's a critical time.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 4 August 2010 21:38 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbEOgfq3CNc
― ninjas and lasers and gold and (snoball), Wednesday, 4 August 2010 21:41 (fifteen years ago)
i wish someone had written an article predicting its demise called not waving but drowning
― the itsytitchyschneider (s1ocki), Wednesday, 4 August 2010 21:50 (fifteen years ago)
bizarre, only yesterday i randomly started thinking about google wave and where the hell had it gone
― F-Unit (Ste), Wednesday, 4 August 2010 22:23 (fifteen years ago)
Google waves wipes out.
― Blue Sky Whine (SeekAltRoute), Thursday, 5 August 2010 03:51 (fifteen years ago)
wave
rip
― where ilxor ends and markers begins (history mayne), Thursday, 30 June 2011 00:40 (fourteen years ago)
google wave
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 17 September 2019 02:22 (six years ago)
google stadia
― ciderpress, Tuesday, 17 September 2019 02:25 (six years ago)
I mean, its legend still lives on in elements of Google Docs or Asana.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6pgxLaDdQw
I think its problem was that it just used the word "wave" way too much.
― pplains, Tuesday, 17 September 2019 02:33 (six years ago)