https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7z6dxQVhE8o
― the shart of noise (history mayne), Monday, 4 January 2010 11:11 (fifteen years ago)
Sorry to be dull on what will hopefully blossom into a rollicking thread of snark and existential despair, but I moved last year and I forgot to fill in the voter registration form until two months after I was meant to and after the new lists were apparently compiled. Have I done myself out of a vote? It'd be a shame with such lovely options to choose from.
― brett favre vs bernard fevre, fite (a passing spacecadet), Monday, 4 January 2010 12:40 (fifteen years ago)
i dunno you might have a booming constituent
― Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Monday, 4 January 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)
oh wait you live in oxford n/m
srsly tho wai are all the papers and radios saying "the campaign starts here" on 4 january? because politicians are zinging each other? bfd. there's still another 2-3 months before we can break out the
http://i38.tinypic.com/fmul9t.jpg
gifs.
― the shart of noise (history mayne), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:29 (fifteen years ago)
I am almost certain I won't be voting Brown in the '10.
― I'm into SB (Noodle Vague), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)
Noodle Hague more like.
― Space Battle Rothko (Matt DC), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:48 (fifteen years ago)
surely as a good Hull lad you'll be giving Prescott a boost
― Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:48 (fifteen years ago)
let me just get this out of the way
― max, Monday, 4 January 2010 14:48 (fifteen years ago)
good luck uk
Prezza is busy on Twitter at the moment, focussing pre-election strategy mainly on ripping the piss out of Piers Morgan
― mdskltr (blueski), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:49 (fifteen years ago)
Okay so another 6 months of beating myself up over this before an hilarious hung parliament and a further year of Sports Politics at its brutal best?
― I'm into SB (Noodle Vague), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:49 (fifteen years ago)
also lol max
― Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:52 (fifteen years ago)
felt a bit insincere tbh
― mdskltr (blueski), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:52 (fifteen years ago)
when i said it to them, it was in hope; reckon there's more than an element of gallows humour in the backatcha
question to the house: what could the most interesting upshot of this election be?
― Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:55 (fifteen years ago)
Brutal rioting for months on end that brings our current Parliamentary system to a deserved close.
― I'm into SB (Noodle Vague), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:56 (fifteen years ago)
Nah, just kidding.
Some cunt from Eton having to pretend to not be Patrician scum for 3 months.
― I'm into SB (Noodle Vague), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:57 (fifteen years ago)
down for that
XPOST
― Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:57 (fifteen years ago)
if david cameron revealed himself to be the master off of dr who, i guess.
― the shart of noise (history mayne), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:57 (fifteen years ago)
if kevin shields did labour's election ditty.
― the shart of noise (history mayne), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:58 (fifteen years ago)
if Lib Dems somehow wound up holding the balance of power. not sure if this counts as comedy or tragedy or both one after the other.
― I'm into SB (Noodle Vague), Monday, 4 January 2010 14:59 (fifteen years ago)
NO. WAIT. I KNOW.
If Jeremy Vine dresses up as Fred West for an hilarious election night swingometer presentation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7JX8D1Kb88
― I'm into SB (Noodle Vague), Monday, 4 January 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)
I will never get tired of re-posting that.
So far amused by Cameron and caterwauling baby, Cameron's reappearing yo-yo dieter's dewlap. Little else about Cameron amuses me.
― sacher torte reform (suzy), Monday, 4 January 2010 15:06 (fifteen years ago)
srsly tho wai are all the papers and radios saying "the campaign starts here" on 4 january?
Cameron billboards have started springing up around the place, so I guess at least his campaign has started.
― Colonel Poo, Monday, 4 January 2010 15:07 (fifteen years ago)
ah. i should leave the house once in a while i guess.
― the shart of noise (history mayne), Monday, 4 January 2010 15:08 (fifteen years ago)
also newspaper and radio journalists are the biggest Sports Politics fans going.
― I'm into SB (Noodle Vague), Monday, 4 January 2010 15:08 (fifteen years ago)
http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e217/hebiyaro/VoteSaxon.jpg
― James Mitchell, Monday, 4 January 2010 15:10 (fifteen years ago)
Cameron billboards rather than Conservative Party billboards? Would make sense, but...
Bit I'm least looking forward to = endless stream of party hacks from both sides trying to make out that their plans for cutting public spending aren't essentially the same, and everyone ignoring the elephant in the room ie why that deficit became necessary in the first place.
― Space Battle Rothko (Matt DC), Monday, 4 January 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)
they do feel more like Cameron ads, just his big mug and a quote
― mdskltr (blueski), Monday, 4 January 2010 15:18 (fifteen years ago)
In the same way that 97 played up Blair and down Labour. Took them most of 10 years to work out how to play this game but they're up to speed now.
― I'm into SB (Noodle Vague), Monday, 4 January 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)
Nah 97 played up New Labour and played down Labour, but there were still other prominent faces in there with Blair. Cameron dominates almost everything media-wise - only Ken Clarke and George Osborne have any real profile.
― Space Battle Rothko (Matt DC), Monday, 4 January 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)
what about eric pickles the singstar fiend
― Electric Universe (wherever that is) (acoleuthic), Monday, 4 January 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)
Something wrong with his face, here:
http://timesonline.typepad.com/.a/6a00d83451586c69e2012876a4c2d0970c-400wi
As opposed to the usual 'something wrong'.
― James Mitchell, Monday, 4 January 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)
no tie.
― the shart of noise (history mayne), Monday, 4 January 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)
Double chin inexpertly airbrushed out.
― Space Battle Rothko (Matt DC), Monday, 4 January 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)
New Labour was obviously being pushed but srsly who represented it other than Blair? A few grinning back-up singers doesn't really say "hi we are new crew in town" and as far as I recall the lol personalities didn't emerge until after the election was won. I guess they wheeled on the odd comedy proletarian like Prescott but that was purely to keep us simple-minded working class voters onside.
I feel like the PPBs had been getting more Presidential since at least mid-period Kinnock so I can't entirely blame Blair but Cameron 2010 is really just the latest counterstrike in the call and response game of Personality Politics that Nu/Labour have been happy to play since the 90s.
In the same way that the 97 campaign pinned the focus onto issues of competency/honesty rather than policy, and those issues are now fucking up a zero-policy Labour party (NB policy wonks/on-message ILXors, for "zero-policy" read "barely any discernible twatting difference between Labour and Tory policy", I know they have policies, but they're scumshit, okays?), the 97 campaign took Personality to its heart and now these daft twats are saddled with G. Brown vs. a shiny Blair 2.0
― I'm into SB (Noodle Vague), Monday, 4 January 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)
When your SIL is deputy ed of Vogue you'd think good airbrushing would be a phonecall away.
*Shirt doesn't fit*Dodgy airbrushing*Disturbing lack of Adam's apple DOES HE HAVE MOOBS y/n*Bizarre, dirt/5pm shadow across top lip*"Subliminal" pilfering of NHS colourways/identity
― sacher torte reform (suzy), Monday, 4 January 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)
*Not quite looking out at the viewer, is he/shifty eyes
― I'm into SB (Noodle Vague), Monday, 4 January 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)
A good slogan would have been "This Is It"...
― Mark G, Monday, 4 January 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)
*No ears
― We should have called Suzie and Bobby (NickB), Monday, 4 January 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)
That is odd, it's as if he's midway through being morphed with James McAvoy or someone a touch better-looking. Maybe it's the other way round and they've hired a model with just enough features to suggest Cameron?
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 4 January 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)
Kinda looks like me on the back of a spoon.
― We should have called Suzie and Bobby (NickB), Monday, 4 January 2010 16:12 (fifteen years ago)
oh man if nick clegg really does become kingmaker http://991.com/newgallery/Kingmaker-Ten-Years-Asleep-319210.jpgthen i really will hope for *puts on shades* ten years asleep
― just someone who's l o s t (history mayne), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 14:01 (fifteen years ago)
it wouldn't happen in another world
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)
cameron does just look like a fascist
― conrad, Tuesday, 5 January 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)
wonder why that is
― Samuel (a hoy hoy), Tuesday, 5 January 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)
http://cached.imagescaler.hbpl.co.uk/resize/scaleToFit/427/285/?sURL=http://offlinehbpl.hbpl.co.uk/News/OKM/08528A1A-97E2-E41B-A5F7A0D32D7165F6.JPG
http://www.marketingmagazine.co.uk/news/976128/Labour-bloggers-release-spoof-version-touched-up-Tory-ad/
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 7 January 2010 11:37 (fifteen years ago)
Needs Hitler moustache.
― Ned Trifle (Notinmyname), Thursday, 7 January 2010 12:03 (fifteen years ago)
or demonic eyes yeah?
― Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Thursday, 7 January 2010 12:04 (fifteen years ago)
Has already.
― Mark G, Thursday, 7 January 2010 12:05 (fifteen years ago)
yeah the eyes are those of an evil baby
― Not a reactionary git, just an idiot. (darraghmac), Thursday, 7 January 2010 12:10 (fifteen years ago)
on rollerskates.
― Mark G, Thursday, 7 January 2010 12:12 (fifteen years ago)
http://blogs.thisismoney.co.uk/.a/6a00d8341c565553ef012876b37d94970c-pi
― keyser (suzy), Thursday, 7 January 2010 14:51 (fifteen years ago)
good luck ordnance survey
― Patriarchy Oppression Machine (history mayne), Thursday, 7 January 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)
rubbish hitler tache
― Home Taping Is Killing Zack Morris (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 7 January 2010 15:03 (fifteen years ago)
groucho
― conrad, Thursday, 7 January 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)
"Good Moaning!"
― Mark G, Thursday, 7 January 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
http://splinteredsunrise.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/herbert_kornfeld.jpg
― Neil S, Thursday, 7 January 2010 16:45 (fifteen years ago)
I love the "odour lines" above the jacket that imply he smells. Weirdly enough the 'tache suits him.
― an executive by day and a wild man by night (snoball), Thursday, 7 January 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)
― I'm into SB (Noodle Vague), Monday, January 4, 2010 2:57 PM (2 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― caek, Friday, 19 March 2010 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
^ that Cameron poster reminds me a bit of this:
http://www.aolcdn.com/photos-music/rage-against-machine-v2-320-061507.jpg
― Ismael Klata, Friday, 19 March 2010 12:58 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/mar/21/treasury-vince-cable-hung-parliament
― caek, Sunday, 21 March 2010 15:21 (fifteen years ago)
He didn't say to me: 'Yes, minister, but you can't do that'."http://blacksheepsoftware.com.au/bradley/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/char_sirhumphrey.gif(Jim Hacker as PM more likely than a hung Parliament imo)
― black jeans stained by (snoball), Sunday, 21 March 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)
Was there ever a time when the party The Sun didn't back, didn't win?
― piscesx, Thursday, 25 March 2010 17:57 (fifteen years ago)
Cable, whose credibility has grown throughout the economic crisis, made clear that, if he was to be offered the chancellorship in a hung parliament, he would jump at the chance.
so it turns out the real story is that cable asked for a meeting with treasury officials, they agreed "to be polite", had a brief 20 min chat, and then he goes off to the papers acting like they gave him the keys to no 11. mr credibility.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/benedictbrogan/100030767/has-saint-vince-oversold-himself/
― joe, Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:10 (fifteen years ago)
chancellor's debate on 4 tomorrow. will be watching if the stream works outside the UK.
― caek, Sunday, 28 March 2010 13:12 (fifteen years ago)
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2008/01/21/Osborne2460x276.jpg
He's ready
― caek, Sunday, 28 March 2010 13:14 (fifteen years ago)
Torrenting this and it's going straight up on piratebay.org
― James Mitchell, Monday, 29 March 2010 19:25 (fifteen years ago)
Cable is doing well on this safe in the knowledge that no one can be arsed to attack him.
Darling is somehow managing to duck the limelight, no idea how.
Osborne has laid himself open to one or two massive zings and is looking ridiculous.
― Matt DC, Monday, 29 March 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)
From the twitter chat thing on the website:
Gotcha I knew I'd heard the name RT @eliotjordan: @frasereC4 Justin Bieber is the finance spokesperson for UKIP
― James Mitchell, Monday, 29 March 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)
Most significant bit of that debate was right at the end, when Cable let slip that he thought the election of a Tory government would represent "a change for the worse". Is that official LibDem policy in the event of a hung Parliament, Vince?
Darling wasn't particularly impressive, especially when talking about banking regulation when he was appalling, but did okay by virtue of not being George Osborne.
― Matt DC, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)
http://poldraw.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/labour-pledge-card3.jpg
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 09:19 (fifteen years ago)
May the 6th apparently.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8603591.stm
― bilbao baggins (88), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:19 (fifteen years ago)
Sky: "The Queen has arrived at Buckingham Palace in a helicopter."
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 08:55 (fifteen years ago)
"Our cameras have been rolling all the time - I'm told that if we turn the sound right up, we can hear Her Majesty's arrival and the solemn punching up."
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 09:07 (fifteen years ago)
Brown has set the courage bar so low that I'm starting to admire him a little for not clinging on until June
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 09:39 (fifteen years ago)
He's probably got a holiday booked in the off season.
― nasri like the wolf (onimo), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 09:42 (fifteen years ago)
Going to the World Cup to support England
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 09:44 (fifteen years ago)
A good day for Sky+ and Guinness in cans.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 09:47 (fifteen years ago)
Okay, looking forward to Labour making the positive case of what they intend to achieve in the next 5 years that will bring lost sheep like me back to the fold.
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:33 (fifteen years ago)
remember why you left the fold?
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:36 (fifteen years ago)
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:33 (4 minutes ago) Bookmark
Speaking outside Number 10 Downing Street, the Labour leader made an impassioned personal appeal to the public, citing the "middle-class" values of his background.
:/
― joe, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:42 (fifteen years ago)
should do what we did- make the middles class rich, then blame them for everything
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:44 (fifteen years ago)
Just read everything I write from this point on as bile-stewed cynicism unless I tell y'all otherwise.
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:45 (fifteen years ago)
shit that's my bad in fairness, should really know better.
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:46 (fifteen years ago)
As opposed to what actually happened: make the middle class rich, then blame everyone poorer or richer than them for everything
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:47 (fifteen years ago)
Things this General Election will be good for, #1: Compiling a shit-list of previously below-the-parapet celebs who Get Their Tory On.
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:48 (fifteen years ago)
Compiling a shit-list of previously below-the-parapet celebs who Get Their Tory On.
Needs Marcello's uncannny Tory Detector skillz
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:50 (fifteen years ago)
basically no topline celebs were openly tory in the first decade of labour in power iirc, so yeah, will be interestingthough celebs who actually campaign for labour will be interesting too
― rip sarah silverman 3/19/10 never forget (history mayne), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:50 (fifteen years ago)
lol
xpost
Weren't Busted or McFly, someone like that, Tories?
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:51 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, Busted. I thought you were after topline celebs?
― ailsa, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:52 (fifteen years ago)
They were topline for a couple of seconds, a few years abck?
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:53 (fifteen years ago)
or back even
Hey I heard Kenny Everett's just come out for the Tories
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:54 (fifteen years ago)
So just golfing old comedian types and Kirstie Allsop then?
― ailsa, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:56 (fifteen years ago)
I'm having 20 quid on a Gordon Brown/Susan Boyle photo-op before May 6.
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:57 (fifteen years ago)
Just where are this generation's Celeb Scouse Tories?
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:58 (fifteen years ago)
"'Wild Horses Couldn't Make Me Vote Tory SNP' Claims SuBo"
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 10:59 (fifteen years ago)
Campaigning for the Lib Dems iirc
celeb voting roundup from the people: http://www.people.co.uk/news/tm_headline=celebrity-x-factor&method=full&objectid=22143891&siteid=93463-name_page.html
― joe, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:16 (fifteen years ago)
what are the lib dems, iyo?
(it's not laziness in not looking it up, ILX just sums it up better, straighter & funnier)
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:17 (fifteen years ago)
Comedian David Baddiel said: "I'm dallying between Labour, Lib Dems, Tories, Greens, Whigs, Communists, Sinn Fein, the SNP, Morecambe Bay Independents and the Church of the Militant Elvis."
they hardly need to tell us he's a comedian when he delivers gold like that
― rip sarah silverman 3/19/10 never forget (history mayne), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:19 (fifteen years ago)
Good to see the Celebrity Cockney Wanker element still out in force for the Tories
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:19 (fifteen years ago)
Lib Dems as usual then, Dave?
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:23 (fifteen years ago)
James Beattie must be the only Tory in Stoke.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:24 (fifteen years ago)
(xxp) and how is Jim Davidson these days? Oh wait, I don't give a fuck.
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:25 (fifteen years ago)
I watched the expenses scandal unfold via BBC World television, which presented a rather distorted picture of how Britain works. Nick Clegg emerges as the major figure in UK politics, I assume solely on the basis of his having the mildest accent and slowest delivery of the party leaders.
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:25 (fifteen years ago)
Wag Lizzie Cundy said: "I'll vote Tory. My father was art director at Saatchi & Saatchi and did Margaret Thatcher's first ad campaign. I'm not happy with the tax on booze and petrol and I think Cameron's the man for PM."
I'm A Celebrity's DAVID VAN DAY said: "I was the panto villain in the jungle but Gordon Brown is far worse than I was. I'm voting Tory."
Other celebrity Conservative backers include CILLA BLACK, PAUL DANIELS, JIM DAVIDSON, PHIL COLLINS, KEN DODD and IAN BOTHAM.
― i greet such a stimulating morning (stevie), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:27 (fifteen years ago)
darragh, Lib Dems = Tories wearing slippers instead of Doc Martens
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:27 (fifteen years ago)
i had something like that in my head, alright.
lib dems- the acceptable face of toryism?
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:28 (fifteen years ago)
the acceptable face of acceptability
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:30 (fifteen years ago)
depends on the constituency. here, they are basically the surrogate tories, no slippers required.
― tomofthenest, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:30 (fifteen years ago)
The unacceptable face of 'neither of the other two'-ism.
― the big pink suede panda bear hurts (ledge), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:31 (fifteen years ago)
when there's an acceptable face of 'neither of the two' then you guys are sorted.
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:32 (fifteen years ago)
not to rub it in, but at least we have labour, y'know?
Lib Dems = the type of club that spends just long enough among the big boys for people to start assuming they are a big club themselves. See Coventry, Charlton, Norwich, Wimbledon; position currently occupied by Fulham.
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:33 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, that's the most annoying aspect of them. It's a bit like people who say, "Oh Celtic and Rangers, one's just as bad as the other."
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:34 (fifteen years ago)
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/4/6/1270549564015/Gordon-Brown-and-the-cabi-001.jpg
supermantheme.wav
― Earning your Masters in Library and Information Science is beautiful (schlump), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:36 (fifteen years ago)
think they're more like villa or spurs. always qualifying for europe, never in with the slightest chance of being champions.
― tomofthenest, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:37 (fifteen years ago)
more like they pretend to be Man U or Chelsea depending on who they're playing but then get rumbled and disqualified at the last moment.
But nah, joeks, they're still soft-pedal Tories at heart
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:40 (fifteen years ago)
Never more so than with Clegg at the helm
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:41 (fifteen years ago)
Looking at who were the big clubs last time the Libs had a PM, they don't bring the laughs like Newcastle, so that possibly makes them Huddersfield.
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:45 (fifteen years ago)
lol at bnp assassination plot by the way
― caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:46 (fifteen years ago)
Night of the Blunt Knives
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:47 (fifteen years ago)
Lib Dems may get a Europa League spot with VINCE CABLE VINCE CABLE VINCE CABLE VINCE CABLE VINCE "NOSTRADAMUS" CABLE VINCE CABLE
― Bauhaus, in the middle of our street (King Boy Pato), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:47 (fifteen years ago)
The Le Tissier of the Lib Dems
― tomofthenest, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:48 (fifteen years ago)
aw I like Le Tiss
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:49 (fifteen years ago)
(xxxp) "People plotted to kill Hitler, now someone's plotted to kill me! So that must make me a serious politician!"
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 11:50 (fifteen years ago)
Lib Dems are: a) not the other two
Lib Dems were:b) a nice comfy safe vote for middle classers who know that better public services and environmental issues are right-on things to talk about but paying for them might dent our cosy lifestyles in practice, so we get to vote for a party that talks about these things safe in the knowledge that they won't actually get in and do anything about it
(but current leadership has decided that point A and some vague chat about cutting deficits is a better look than the 90s gotta-spend-money stylez, so, basically I guess they are soft-pedal Tories, 'cept if you ask any LD voter I've met they'll tell you that they couldn't ever bear to vote Tory and that they did vote Labour once maybe actually maybe they didn't they don't quite remember but anyway it's all different now)
― falling while carrying an owl (a passing spacecadet), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:03 (fifteen years ago)
I think you're all missing out on this "hilariously witty" campaign: http://www.labservative.com
― Bauhaus, in the middle of our street (King Boy Pato), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:10 (fifteen years ago)
Looking forward to "Suggest" Banksy's take on this
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:11 (fifteen years ago)
I bet it'll be Jeremy Vine sucking off an armadillo wearing a policeman's helmet, or something
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:14 (fifteen years ago)
This poll tracker is pretty fascinating historically; goes back to 1983.
Seems that, until relatively recently, Labour never suffered the mid-term dips that characterised the Thatcher government. I can recall their/her popularity being in the gutter from within a few months of the '79 election until the Falklands. The poll tracker also shows Lab edging ahead within a year of their worst ever election mauling ('83) and holding a lead from spring '85 through to the beginning of '87. Labour back ahead again 18 months after another GE thumping (including the comically huge leads in the spring of '90 around the time of the Poll Tax riots), but basically nothing in it once Thatch had gone - very tight from early '91 up through the Major election win.
Labour then with huge leads from the summer of '92 right through to the fuel crisis of Sept '00 (barely a blip) and then again until finally the Tories get some traction after Cameron's election in late '05. Labour still could've won a summer/autumn '07 election.
― Michael Jones, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:16 (fifteen years ago)
It looks kind of obvious that they'd've won in 07 now, but I'm sure Gordon isn't dwelling on that in a sleepless haze of stomach ache every night.
Another fun General Election competion: let's see which Graun columnist can do the best "Here is an Enormous List of Betrayals and Stupidities Committed by the Last Labour Government and Why They Still Deserve Your Vote" article.
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:19 (fifteen years ago)
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/About/General/2009/10/16/1255690770426/Darragh-McManus-002.jpg
― caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:20 (fifteen years ago)
Bold clam not going with Toynbee there
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:21 (fifteen years ago)
I heard someone say on the BBC a little while ago that even if the Tories end up 10 percentage points ahead of Labour, they would still end up with an absolute majority of only 1 seat. Can this really be so, I did I mishear him?
― Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:32 (fifteen years ago)
what happened on the 24th of September 2003 such that Labour, the Conservatives, AND the Lib Dems were tied - 31% each on the ICM poll, and similarly close on the YouGov one? I have no recollection of this.
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:34 (fifteen years ago)
And will Tories be still giving it all that "First past the post, best system in the world, strong governments" malarkey if that happens?
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:34 (fifteen years ago)
(xp)
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:35 (fifteen years ago)
They could be 99% ahead of labour nationally and end up losing the election. Depends entirely on how the votes are distributed. Folk wisdom is the current map favours labour by around 10 points, but that's more something that gets repeated a lot by columnists rather than demonstrated by pollsters.
― caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:35 (fifteen years ago)
I hadn't heard that, but the boundaries have got a bit silly I gather. Labour will be the largest party so long as they lose by less than four, I think.
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:36 (fifteen years ago)
< 4 depends on how the votes are distributed. I think all bets are off tbh.
― caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:37 (fifteen years ago)
BBC.BBC.BBCThe Labour propaganda machine always questioning Tories in an agressive manner while giving Labour an easy ride.Sack the lot when Tories are elected. BBC is our democratic enemy.- Lemar, london uk, 6/4/2010 10:38 Rating 109
- Lemar, london uk, 6/4/2010 10:38 Rating 109
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:37 (fifteen years ago)
Again, it's not that simple. It depends on where they lose. They "lost" England last time, iirc.
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:38 (fifteen years ago)
BBC is our democratic enemy.
FACKING DEMOCRATIC BAAAAASTODS
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:39 (fifteen years ago)
let's see which Graun columnist can do the best "Here is an Enormous List of Betrayals and Stupidities Committed by the Last Labour Government and Why They Still Deserve Your Vote" article.
I mean there's a lot going on here, but isn't this yer basic ilxor POV on it too?
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:40 (fifteen years ago)
starting point re: boundaries/FPTP problems.
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/02/for-uk-conservatives-its-mp-ratio-that.html
As put by the Wall Street Journal: "The British electoral system does have its problems—chief among them being a constituency map that gives Labour a built-in advantage sometimes estimated to be equal to 10% of the national vote."Looking back over the last 35 years, it turns out that this claim, commonly made in the US and UK press, is indeed the case for the last three elections, but not beyond that. In fact, from 1979 to 1992, the Tories enjoyed an electoral advantage that inflated their vote share signficantly more than Labour.
Looking back over the last 35 years, it turns out that this claim, commonly made in the US and UK press, is indeed the case for the last three elections, but not beyond that. In fact, from 1979 to 1992, the Tories enjoyed an electoral advantage that inflated their vote share signficantly more than Labour.
if the piling belize money into marginals strategy has worked, the "built-in" advantage is going to be nothing like 10%.
― caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:40 (fifteen years ago)
Does seem strange if it really is that skewed to Labour. A hung parliament would surely be disastrous for the Tories, a bit less disastrous for Labour (as long as they had the balls to dump Brown and start afresh)
― Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)
Actual odds are:
largest party: C 1/6, L 7/1 (not moving much at all - had been 1/7, went out to 1/5 a week or so ago, now down again)outright majority: C 8/15, L 11/1hung parliament: 13/8
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)
i mean it's better than the u.s. e.g. in the last election the republicans got 47% of the vote or whatever it was, and 0% of the presidents. think about it.
― caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:42 (fifteen years ago)
kenya got 1 president out of it iirc
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:42 (fifteen years ago)
tru
― caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:43 (fifteen years ago)
In fact, from 1979 to 1992, the Tories enjoyed an electoral advantage that inflated their vote share signficantly more than Labour.
Certainly did
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:43 (fifteen years ago)
Brown speaking to Morrisons staff. No big political questions yet. Plenty of chat re easter eggs and school runs
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:44 (fifteen years ago)
Does seem strange if it really is that skewed to Labour.
it's not. the party to which it is "skewed" is weather rather than climate as far as the electoral system goes. that a "skew" exists though is an inherent part of a FPTP system.
― caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:45 (fifteen years ago)
There are certainly ILXors who seem to adhere to "My Party, right or wrong". There's an inherent appeal in the "vote against the Tories at all costs" line. I believe Cameron when he says they will change things, that's why a majority Tory gov is still a thing to be feared, I think. But a positive reason to vote Labour? Doubt it. And it really does feel like a case of voting for them would only be encouraging them, at this stage.
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:45 (fifteen years ago)
not voting them with the hope that they will behave better when they scrape a win/eke out a coalition seems like a pretty risky strategy to most of us, i suspect.
― caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:47 (fifteen years ago)
There are certainly ILXors who seem to adhere to "My Party, right or wrong".
Haven't come across to many of them, tbh
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:50 (fifteen years ago)
I know, but voting for them is supporting the current regime. Things are gonna be bleak, whatever. Personally I prefer bleak with the possibility of change in the Labour party rather than bleak plus short term belly laughs at the Tories. But hey, belly laughs are fun while they last.
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:50 (fifteen years ago)
can't see any tory loss scenario in which brown isn't fatally weakened and replaced during the next parliament.
― caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
lolz all round
Grant Shapps, amazing as usual:
Just as Apple, the inventors of the iPhone, ensured that their product was ‘open source’ - meaning that software developers could come along and invent ways to use the phone going well beyond what Apple themselves had initially imagined - so too will our planning policy benefit from involved citizens achieving more than central government could ever manage on its own.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:53 (fifteen years ago)
xxpost
I don't think that kind of change from within scenario will get you anything other than a Blairite or Brownite replacement. Maybe every other scenario leads the same way but that's the tiny slither of light I need to keep me from giving up all hope in humanity forever, right now.
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:54 (fifteen years ago)
xp wow
― caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:55 (fifteen years ago)
So every time he pops up talking in some forced trend-referencing way, we can say we have a Shapps for that?
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:57 (fifteen years ago)
see also
Pawlenty also had a few words to offer on the passage of Obamacare. "The Democrats are advancing a bill that's bad for the country," he says. "It's another example of the federal government taking over programs. The federal government is now acting like General Motors in the 1970s — they want to create big, centralized bureaucracies. [The GOP] is offering solutions that are like the Apple iPhone, with the consumers in charge. It's a very different vision."
― caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 12:58 (fifteen years ago)
THAT'S MY GOVERNOR. arrrghghghghghhh
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:02 (fifteen years ago)
the inventors of the iPhone, ensured that their product was ‘open source’ - meaning that software developers could come along and invent ways to use the phone going well beyond what Apple themselves had initially imagined
wish someone could tell them to invent a way to let it work properly with media player tbh
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:05 (fifteen years ago)
would watch this wacky sitcom
― "I DONT WANT HOUSE CHICKEN I WANT THIS PLACE CHICKEN!" (stevie), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:09 (fifteen years ago)
classic charlie sheen catchphrase
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:11 (fifteen years ago)
I presume Grant Shapps A++ grasp on the concept of "Open Source" will mean he will be minister in charge of technology, communications, disbanding offcom etc. when he tories get in.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:31 (fifteen years ago)
every election needs its fatuous invented new demographic, and so i am pleased to announce: morrison's mums.
http://waugh.standard.co.uk/2010/04/morrisons-mums.html
― joe, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:33 (fifteen years ago)
I'm sick of this already.
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:34 (fifteen years ago)
See also Aldi Aunts, Tesco Teenagers, Sainsbury's Step-parents...
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:35 (fifteen years ago)
"one show man" (via the thick of it)
― rip sarah silverman 3/19/10 never forget (history mayne), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:36 (fifteen years ago)
Waitrose Wankers
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:36 (fifteen years ago)
That's me
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:38 (fifteen years ago)
That's me too, some of the time!
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:38 (fifteen years ago)
Fine Fare FuckersKey Market Kocks
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:40 (fifteen years ago)
Presto Perverts
Bejam Bastards
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:41 (fifteen years ago)
Lidl Hitlers
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:41 (fifteen years ago)
from that People article on celebrity voting intentions, enjoyed this :
Pop star TONY HADLEY of Spandau Ballet said: "I hope the British public will not allow themselves to be conned into voting for another five years of this disgraced Labour Government. "We badly need a radical and strong government to change the fabric of Britain. I think the Conservatives are the only party that's brave and capable enough of doing this."Spandau Ballet star GARY KEMP said: "Come on the Reds! I'll be backing Labour all the way."
Spandau Ballet star GARY KEMP said: "Come on the Reds! I'll be backing Labour all the way."
― p-dog, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:42 (fifteen years ago)
lidl hitlers ftw
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:43 (fifteen years ago)
aldi young dudes
We badly need a radical and strong government to change the fabric of Britain.
Vote Zanu PF
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:44 (fifteen years ago)
sinn fein- strong, cohesive, local, left wing- what you guys waiting for?
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:45 (fifteen years ago)
lidl hitlersaldi young dudes
beautiful
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:46 (fifteen years ago)
Tesco Express - "Theme from Tesco Express"
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:47 (fifteen years ago)
suspect voters get a bit narked at all the labels that are dreamed up during election campaigns. Worcester Woman, Mondeo Man, heck, I even remember William Hague's Peppledash People.
peppledash?
― "I DONT WANT HOUSE CHICKEN I WANT THIS PLACE CHICKEN!" (stevie), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:48 (fifteen years ago)
No wonder he lost
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 13:49 (fifteen years ago)
^^^
― caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 14:08 (fifteen years ago)
Double lols from me for "lidl hitlers" because I pronounce "little" like that.
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 14:09 (fifteen years ago)
What is with wearing a jacket and shirt with no tie? Is a young conservative thing or are all you young people doing it? Bloody disgraceful.http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4021/4497334348_23e1079141_o.jpg
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)
I think it's an "Eton tossbag" thing.
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)
It's going on at my work at the moment because the office is nominally keeping 'vacation' hours. I'm wearing two ties to keep standards up.
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 15:44 (fifteen years ago)
'two ties' was michael heseltine's nickname for former tory mp stephen milligan
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)
whey all the twoties as?
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)
Personally I prefer bleak with the possibility of change in the Labour party rather than bleak plus short term belly laughs at the Tories.
tory govt would be a cavalcade of psychotic rabelaisian black humour and hogarthian farce
they're really a terrible lot
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)
suppose the alternative is to believe they're the blairites who came of age a few years too late but osborne et al have something deathly grim about them
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)
Is there an et al? Osborne always seems kind of a unique creature, like Smèagol, and I daren't look too closely lest I'm wrong.
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)
just assuming there are unseen hoardes of them, like with icebergs or arboreal fungi
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:19 (fifteen years ago)
"My name is Osbourne, for we are many"
― tomofthenest, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:21 (fifteen years ago)
somewhere in an abandoned cupboard in smith square, isomorphic homunculi are scraping their way out of their larval sacs, identical in all but scale to the junior ministers they will shortly become
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)
isometric homunculi?
― tomofthenest, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:24 (fifteen years ago)
they look just like george osborne, but really tiny, writhing in sublime jouissance as they tear apart the the soft tissues of moths and flies
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)
for balance:
http://www.independent.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00053/Tom_Watson_53828s.jpg
― rip sarah silverman 3/19/10 never forget (history mayne), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
http://i41.tinypic.com/aws38j.jpg
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
nick frost and dom passantino's love-child?
― 404s & Heartbreak (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)
was going to say
― caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:59 (fifteen years ago)
Jeez I was about to joke about Tom having let himself go and then I checked the picture tag and it was Tom.
― Top Geir (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 17:25 (fifteen years ago)
Meanwhile, ~40 MPs debate the Digital Economy Bill
http://imgur.com/BvyIF.png
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:10 (fifteen years ago)
unbelievably classic moment on Newsnight just now, interviewing a crowd of well-turned-out Tories standing around in Leeds, waiting for David Cameron. the reporter calls out, "who's excited here?" pause "anybody excited??" and the crowd smiles and sort of sheepishly goes "yeahh."
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:49 (fifteen years ago)
most entitled "yeah" ever
sort of missing jeremy's tonight pompadour tbh, he seems neutered without it
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:51 (fifteen years ago)
er, pompadour tonight
Today programme's vox pop with David Cameron's "great ignored" was hilarious this morning. The "silent majority" should stay silent until they learn some basic grammar and idiom. Schools being "run-over" by foreigners....
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 11:39 (fifteen years ago)
broke my heart when her little kid piped up in agreement. could give a shit about their grammar and idiom tbh, that's not the measure of a person, but the sentiments they expressed were tragic and risible.
― "I DONT WANT HOUSE CHICKEN I WANT THIS PLACE CHICKEN!" (stevie), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 11:49 (fifteen years ago)
Mandy's "capitalism in one country" zing was a good-un, I thought.
― Bauhaus, in the middle of our street (King Boy Pato), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 11:50 (fifteen years ago)
The Great Ignored perilously close to the Great Unwashed imo
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 11:51 (fifteen years ago)
Meanwhile...
9.16am: Brown has been visiting the Innocent Smoothies HQ this morning.
― Bauhaus, in the middle of our street (King Boy Pato), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 11:51 (fifteen years ago)
... the phrase I mean!
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 11:53 (fifteen years ago)
(xp) I want to see how well his forced smile holds up to the IS-HQ baby photo wall.
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 11:55 (fifteen years ago)
Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs. Labour's Tax On Jobs.... etc
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 11:56 (fifteen years ago)
The "silent majority" should stay silent until they learn some basic grammar and idiom.
yes, democracy is better left to the well-educated
― letz talk abt (history mayne), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 11:57 (fifteen years ago)
I think he means getting interviewed on telly as opposed to voting
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 11:57 (fifteen years ago)
Each bottle of Gordon Brown smoothie contains a million crushed hopes and a dash of bitter reality.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:00 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.independent.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00042/john-prescott_42488t.jpg
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:00 (fifteen years ago)
Prescott looks like he's got Roger De Courcey's hand up his arse there.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:01 (fifteen years ago)
democracy is better left to the well-educated
i mean this is otm tbh
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:02 (fifteen years ago)
Democracy is better left to those that did arts and humanities degrees (did you see what I did there).
― Bauhaus, in the middle of our street (King Boy Pato), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:04 (fifteen years ago)
what, around evening shifts in KFC?
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:05 (fifteen years ago)
It's at a good time in a High Street location, yes.
― Bauhaus, in the middle of our street (King Boy Pato), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:18 (fifteen years ago)
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/07/article-1264109-0908567D000005DC-46_468x341.jpg
"ILX was right, this is some overpriced shit."
― Bauhaus, in the middle of our street (King Boy Pato), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:21 (fifteen years ago)
best argument against democracy is five minute conversation w/the average voter iirc
― Earning your Masters in Library and Information Science is beautiful (schlump), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:28 (fifteen years ago)
Think there's a grand old tradition from football threads that we need to do here, by the way, namely:
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:40 (fifteen years ago)
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/arts/2007/05/15/brownbig.jpg
HE'S READY
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)
looooool
― letz talk abt (history mayne), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.endevil.com/images/davidcameron2.jpg
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:42 (fifteen years ago)
http://pictures.directnews.co.uk/liveimages/Nick+Clegg_2765_19549637_0_0_7043735_300.jpg
HE MIGHT BE READY, NO ONE'S REALLY LOOKING
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:43 (fifteen years ago)
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2005/05/06/KilroySilkDefeat_final.jpg
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:45 (fifteen years ago)
I'm sure Ed was being ironic about the spelling/grammar thing.
Because I don't go on footer threads I was not aware of the READINESS meme, but I like.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:49 (fifteen years ago)
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/07/article-1264109-090905FB000005DC-181_468x306.jpg
HE'S AROUSED READY
― Bauhaus, in the middle of our street (King Boy Pato), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:54 (fifteen years ago)
where did the "he's ready" meme come from?
it's probably my favourite meme ever
if only we had more memes of that quality, it's like, idk, the great meme-authors have all gone...
― letz talk abt (history mayne), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:56 (fifteen years ago)
I think it's a Swygart creation.
http://blogs.abc.net.au/photos/uncategorized/2008/05/28/cabinet_reshuffle_8_4.jpg
THESE DUDES ARE MOST DEFINITELY READY
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 12:59 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/november2009/261109top.jpg
THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE READY NOW
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:00 (fifteen years ago)
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Arts/Arts_/Pictures/2008/11/05/pete460.jpg
HE'S 25%-35% MORE READY THAN HE WAS FIVE YEARS AGO
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:03 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.diacritic.org/blog/archives/images/sans_trotsky.jpg
WE'RE ON DIS TING NO HYPE LOL: Championship, League One, League Two, Blue Square, and lower thread, 2008/09
― letz talk abt (history mayne), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:03 (fifteen years ago)
My bad.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:04 (fifteen years ago)
― uh is that miseplled? (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:04 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.anorak.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/george-galloway.JPG
HE WOULD BE READY BUT THE POWERS WHO DON'T WANT HIM TO SUCCEED KEEP KEEPING HIM DOWN
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:07 (fifteen years ago)
thanks for sparing us gallowaycatsuit.jpg
― joe, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:12 (fifteen years ago)
http://sheikyermami.com/wp-content/uploads/nick-griffin-eggs-415x275.jpgHe's eggy.
― Ned Trifle (Notinmyname), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:12 (fifteen years ago)
eh it was the skysportslol ad campaign into this season's football campaign i think
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:16 (fifteen years ago)
you'd think if the royal fam wanted a tory win they'd bring this forward:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/theroyalfamily/7562314/Prince-William-and-Kate-Middleton-could-announce-engagement-in-June.html
― letz talk abt (history mayne), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:16 (fifteen years ago)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_V5jYS8eezmU/SrI1UNQxVBI/AAAAAAAABh0/qBcj07fpqec/s400/oh+jury.jpg
HE'S READY YOU LUCKY CAMBRIDGE VOTERS
― joe, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)
i'm not ready for bbcode tags wait
― joe, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:28 (fifteen years ago)
that's me!
a cambridge voter i mean
OR DO I??!1!!?!ONE??!
― letz talk abt (history mayne), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:28 (fifteen years ago)
That is you, I'd recgonise that face anywhere
― Collectible Spoons of the 3rd Reich (Tom D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:30 (fifteen years ago)
This is the first UK gen. election I can vote in. Looking forward to it!
― Davek (davek_00), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:31 (fifteen years ago)
next ilx code update really needs a feature that takes you to one side and says "you realise you're putting an image link in italics there, right?"
― MPx4A, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:38 (fifteen years ago)
My father told me this evening that Grant Shapps and three of his minions were leafleting commuters at Hatfield railway station yesterday.
At least they were until the First Capital Connect security escorted them off the premises for not having permission to be there.
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 23:04 (fifteen years ago)
Awesome. How politics and its coverage looks, and what that says about politics, a blog by one of Fashion Architecture Taste:
http://electoaesthetics.blogspot.com/
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 8 April 2010 00:01 (fifteen years ago)
I hate this election already.
― seandalai, Thursday, 8 April 2010 00:16 (fifteen years ago)
that times a thousand
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 8 April 2010 00:19 (fifteen years ago)
I'm voting Labour, founder of Tory gay rights group says
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/im-voting-labour-founder-of-tory-gay-rights-group-says-1938700.html
― piscesx, Thursday, 8 April 2010 00:28 (fifteen years ago)
"Any suggestion that Chris Grayling is against gay rights is wholly wrong – it is a matter of record that he voted for civil partnerships," said a party spokeswoman. "He also voted in favour of the legislation that prohibited bed and breakfast owners from discriminating against gay people."
Party spokeswoman not realising she's showing that Grayling doesn't vote in accordance with his stated opinions. So now the gays hate him for being a homophobe and the Tory homophobes hate him for paying lip-service to their bigotry while forcing gays into their homes.
― nasri like the wolf (onimo), Thursday, 8 April 2010 09:22 (fifteen years ago)
not defending grayling, but he is talking about people who hire out rooms in their homes, a relatively small part of the b&b/hotel-sphere. the reporting in that independent article (and elsewhere) is s.what misleading.
― yella card THIS, yatches (history mayne), Thursday, 8 April 2010 09:29 (fifteen years ago)
He's an accident waiting to happen that guy... and I suppose it's happened... actually it's happened more than once. Another one to look out for, in that regard, is Andrew Lansley.
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 09:30 (fifteen years ago)
If you travel around the Scottish highlands staying at B&Bs half of the ones you end up staying in are basically rooms in other people's houses so I don't think it's that small a part of the market in rural areas. Also he's still a cunt regardless of the market share because this isn't about markets.
― nasri like the wolf (onimo), Thursday, 8 April 2010 09:34 (fifteen years ago)
not defending grayling, but he is talking about people who hire out rooms in their homes, a relatively small part of the b&b/hotel-sphere.
So what? Admittedly, I haven't been in a B&B for years but, in most of the ones I've been, the proprietors seemed to live there too.
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 09:34 (fifteen years ago)
woah the tories are actually "bringing back national service"?
― yella card THIS, yatches (history mayne), Thursday, 8 April 2010 10:43 (fifteen years ago)
It's OK, Michael Caine approves. And, no, I refuse to call the talentless wanker, "Sir"
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 10:49 (fifteen years ago)
talentless? he's an actor, he doesn't need 'talent', he just needs to have looked k cool in the 60's and 70's, which he did.
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Thursday, 8 April 2010 10:51 (fifteen years ago)
"That's trouble with these layabouts on the dole these days, none of them are actually prepared to go out there and look cool"
"Show me a gang taking drugs and I'll show you a group of people who have nothing to look forward to,"
http://markgorman.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/cameron-bullingdon-dining-club2_468x420.jpg
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 10:54 (fifteen years ago)
As long as the scheme is strictly voluntary, it's not necessarily a bad thing is it?
― Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 8 April 2010 10:55 (fifteen years ago)
ts 'nothing to look forward to' vs 'birch the lot of em'
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Thursday, 8 April 2010 10:55 (fifteen years ago)
how can it be strictly voluntary?
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Thursday, 8 April 2010 10:56 (fifteen years ago)
WE INSIST THAT YOU DO THIS if you want to
I'm sure the 3 people who volunteer for it will find it very beneficial
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 10:57 (fifteen years ago)
Ha ha, love how sinister and repellent every face in that photo is. Labour should just whack that up on a hoarding. Governed by this sinister bunch of crypto-fascist Prussian footmen?
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Thursday, 8 April 2010 10:57 (fifteen years ago)
voluntary like they won't get paid to be shot at?
― he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 8 April 2010 10:58 (fifteen years ago)
well, i mean yeah- this hasn't been done yet? ffs who are their marketing guys?
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Thursday, 8 April 2010 10:59 (fifteen years ago)
(re bullingdon club as labour poster)
All I'm saying is a voluntary project for 16 year olds to do good works in the community for a minimum wage is not in itself such a terrible idea is it? I mean, if the Tories are proposing it would probably end up being useless, but as a principle...
― Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:01 (fifteen years ago)
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:59 (46 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:59 (34 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
TS: copyright in photo owned by tory sympathiser vs how much of the country would rather be governed by those they consider their 'superiors'
― "I DONT WANT HOUSE CHICKEN I WANT THIS PLACE CHICKEN!" (stevie), Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:02 (fifteen years ago)
yeah... far better the working-class heroes you get in the upper reaches of the labour party
whose current de facto second-in-command isn't even elected
― history mayne, Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:04 (fifteen years ago)
whose leader of the house is -- oh, you can fill all this in
^ bang on cue
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:06 (fifteen years ago)
Labour played the "toffs" card in a recent byelection and it backfired, iirc
― Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:06 (fifteen years ago)
Yes, no need for that nonsense. Or anymore stupid poster campaigns.
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:08 (fifteen years ago)
manedelson's a mensch imho
(archetypally so, take note dmac)
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:10 (fifteen years ago)
hahaha shd read these posts first
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:11 (fifteen years ago)
mandelson appears to have a brain and is p zingy, but you can't really escape the absurdity of a labour government relying on the likes of him and lord adonis
― history mayne, Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:13 (fifteen years ago)
can't really escape the absurdity of a person called lord adonis tbh
― joe, Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:14 (fifteen years ago)
Lord Myners!!!
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:15 (fifteen years ago)
I can't really escape the absurdity of a person called lord anything... or sir anything, for that matter
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:16 (fifteen years ago)
http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/1773/guccimane771548.jpg
manedelson visits young offender's institution in stockton on tees to awed silence from young crims, mensch that he is
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:17 (fifteen years ago)
he's not a mensch
― history mayne, Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:17 (fifteen years ago)
state vs radric sez otherwise
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:19 (fifteen years ago)
Far from being the ‘me’ generation, young adults (aged between 16 and 24) are the most likely age group to say they would like to give up some free time to help others, with 68% giving it some thought during the festive season. And the idea appeals to more women than men, with 66% expressing an interest against 49% of men.
What ruffians running the streets, becoming crims instead of helping people etc. bring back national service to stop all these children doing heinous charity work you see from them under the labour party
(Was actually googling to find stats I read recently about how volunteering numbers have been rising steadily of late, with teh yuts being the highest age group to do something but fuck it, i'm a lazy googler.)
― he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:22 (fifteen years ago)
The only way Labour can not lose this is by hammering home the "lightweights lightweights lightweights" thing as it's the one genuine concern people have about the Tories. That and the fact that the economy might well get worse under them.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:23 (fifteen years ago)
By "people" I mean "swing voters who might conceivably vote Tory", not us obviously.
ok when you introduce yiddish into uk politics threads, that's really when i start to get lost.
go get yourselves a centre left party, if you don't have one, start one. sitting here moaning, typical of the youths of todays, i bet you're all taking drugs at the back of waitrose
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:24 (fifteen years ago)
this was alright too
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/feb/18/us-gloom-over-uk-economy/print
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:24 (fifteen years ago)
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/03I32BO6Qm31m/610x.jpg
― caek, Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:56 (fifteen years ago)
Change platform to me = "not better, but different" - which might be enough against a party going for a 4th term.
― nasri like the wolf (onimo), Thursday, 8 April 2010 12:11 (fifteen years ago)
Was actually googling to find stats I read recently about how volunteering numbers have been rising steadily of late, with teh yuts being the highest age group to do something
This is more to do with the fact that entry level jobs now require unpaid experience than any surge in civic spirit surely?
― Gravel Puzzleworth, Thursday, 8 April 2010 12:19 (fifteen years ago)
And of course, voluntary service != "Bring Back National Service".
― grobravara hollaglob (dowd), Thursday, 8 April 2010 12:43 (fifteen years ago)
But voluntary service = "Bring Up National Service".
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 12:45 (fifteen years ago)
bring back non-national service
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Thursday, 8 April 2010 12:45 (fifteen years ago)
Like the International Brigades?
― grobravara hollaglob (dowd), Thursday, 8 April 2010 12:47 (fifteen years ago)
This sort of scheme is a hardy perennial of British election campaigns, invariably forgotten about before the polls even close
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 12:50 (fifteen years ago)
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 09:30 (3 hours ago) Bookmark
I did a PowerPoint presentation on this guy, searching a comprehensive database for his response to swine flu. He's a conniving twat. Always looking to say the right thing and one-up whoever's trying to sort out the mess, then when it's sorted suddenly turning into a do-gooder.
― lllljjjj (acoleuthic), Thursday, 8 April 2010 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
The voluntary National Service thing reminds me of that Simpsons episode where Ralph is the only one to sign up for a chip in his head so he can be tracked at all times.
― piscesx, Thursday, 8 April 2010 12:53 (fifteen years ago)
As regards Lansley, i had a pop at him last month on BBC's Question Time show as he was going on and on about what 'the public wants' in respect of the James Bulger case. He shook his head at me and looked grouchy saying "Really?... are you sure?" while i was talking and suchlike, towing the party line for the camera and generally playing to the gallery. It grieves me to say i think we'll be hearing a lot more of him. Still at least i got to put him in his place briefly in front of 3 or 4 million people.
Caroline Lucas by comparison was a model of even-handedness and decorum for the full hour.
― piscesx, Thursday, 8 April 2010 13:03 (fifteen years ago)
^ Who knew David Dimbleby was an ILXor?
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 13:08 (fifteen years ago)
I will be doing my best to vote Lansley out. Not going to happen though.
― seandalai, Thursday, 8 April 2010 13:17 (fifteen years ago)
Surely they should be driving around in a new Boris Routemaster rather than some foreign made thing?
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 8 April 2010 14:03 (fifteen years ago)
Free market. Fuck yer British manufacturers innit?
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 14:08 (fifteen years ago)
"You left-wing scum are all the same, wanting to hand our birthright to Romanian gypsies who beat their wives and children into begging and stealing money they can gamble with, Muslim nutters who want to kill us and put us all under medieval Sharia law, the same Africans who sold their Afro-Caribbean brothers into a slavery that Britain was the first to abolish (but you still want to apologize for!)"
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 8 April 2010 14:59 (fifteen years ago)
i mean that's a faultless parody effort, surely?
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)
haha, he posted it because he was angry that someone had said ukip was a racist party. great rebuttal.
― joe, Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)
Ukip is a party of real people, not career politicians. Real people sometimes make mistakes
heroic defence
― the big pink suede panda bear hurts (ledge), Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:03 (fifteen years ago)
Beginning to think that UKIP, following on from Farage's "Belgium's not even a country" rant, is self-sabotaging in order to make sure the Tories win <---- might run this theory past Mandy, see if Labour can run with it
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)
You left-wing scum are all the same, wanting to hand our birthright to Romanian gypsies who beat their wives and children into begging and stealing money they can gamble with
this is what you left wing scum are like. reel and gasp at the mirror held up.
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)
missing NV input into this tbh
the british were the first patrons of african slave traders to withdraw their custom, clearly something to be immensely proud of
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)
Not like we made any money out of it or anything
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:07 (fifteen years ago)
I suspect that the reason UKIP suspended him was that he forgot to say something offensive about the Jews...
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:10 (fifteen years ago)
british decision to pull out of slave trade cost a lot of jobs, damaged business. wouldn't happen today.
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:11 (fifteen years ago)
Labour's Tax On Slavery
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:11 (fifteen years ago)
the ukip requires each member to have personally participated in the babi yar massacre
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)
the annual fees to the ukipolitburo are paid in the scalps of kosovar foetuses
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)
You left-wing scum are all the samehttp://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/5c/DVader.jpeg
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:15 (fifteen years ago)
Like the bit where he distinguishes between 'Africans' and 'Afro-Carribeans' there.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:17 (fifteen years ago)
good old africans like cecil rhodes and eugene terreblanche
― lllljjjj (acoleuthic), Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:18 (fifteen years ago)
I'd vote for him, but apparently he's been ditched:
Ranting Labour hopeful blasted
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 9 April 2010 11:29 (fifteen years ago)
In another abuse-filled post he wrote: "I f****** hate Paolo Nutini."
^ Missed opportunity here for Labour to win over swing voters, shoulda gone national with that one
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 9 April 2010 11:32 (fifteen years ago)
otoh i do no want to see Cameron posters saying "Pencil full of lead"
― mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 9 April 2010 11:33 (fifteen years ago)
http://anmblog.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c565553ef0133ec9097d7970b-500wi
― spaghetti, Friday, 9 April 2010 11:41 (fifteen years ago)
Face it, how did he expect to win without that crucial Jedward fan demographic? Bet Moray has literally half a dozen of them who are old enough to vote.
― James Mitchell, Friday, 9 April 2010 11:44 (fifteen years ago)
LOL British politics. This is turning into a big story!
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 9 April 2010 11:45 (fifteen years ago)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3310/3599389844_e14a1489cd.jpg
― history mayne, Friday, 9 April 2010 11:46 (fifteen years ago)
http://twitter.com/stuartmaclennan
Sorry, that page doesn’t exist!
:)
― you've been shite, son, in your daft pink boots (onimo), Friday, 9 April 2010 11:46 (fifteen years ago)
:(
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 9 April 2010 11:47 (fifteen years ago)
Moray Firth Zing Crew is ready
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 9 April 2010 11:54 (fifteen years ago)
He would have been alright if he'd just been against letting gay people sleep in his spare bedroom.
― James Mitchell, Friday, 9 April 2010 11:59 (fifteen years ago)
Grabs of some of his tweets herehttp://www.stv.tv/galleries/news/stuart-maclennan/image-5942/#gallery-title
― stet, Friday, 9 April 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)
can't argue with that last one
― Ismael Klata, Friday, 9 April 2010 14:12 (fifteen years ago)
Standing as a Labour candidate in Moray is a futile exercise anyway, it's not exactly a hotbed of left-of-centre progressive politics, hence the success of the left-of-centre progressive English hating SNP
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 9 April 2010 14:25 (fifteen years ago)
UK Politics: your tweets onscreen
― p-dog, Friday, 9 April 2010 15:40 (fifteen years ago)
Fucking amazing work by Sky News in showing incredibly important footage of the Dallas Cowboys stadium being demolished live, waiting a good few minutes for it to finish, then cutting to Tessa Jowell halfway through her speech at the Labour Walthamstow press conference.
― James Mitchell, Sunday, 11 April 2010 12:16 (fifteen years ago)
oh man i totally stayed in today to see tessa jowell's speech at the labour walthamstow press conference http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/angry/3d-mad.gif
― alpha zingdog (history mayne), Sunday, 11 April 2010 12:19 (fifteen years ago)
Election Issues That No One Is Talking About #1 - I would assume the Tories are planning on reducing the deficit by privatising as much as they possibly can. Has anyone actually asked them about this yet?
― Matt DC, Sunday, 11 April 2010 12:28 (fifteen years ago)
Oh man it's about time the Royal Observatory had its Trotskyite monopoly broken up
― What this place needs is an LCD Soundsystem thread (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 11 April 2010 12:33 (fifteen years ago)
it's, er, not exactly a wedge issue:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/oct/12/gordon-brown-public-asset-sale
― joe, Sunday, 11 April 2010 13:44 (fifteen years ago)
BNP to win a seat at next Election?
Singles Only. Applies to whether or not the BNP win a parliamentary seat in the next UK General Election. Settled in accordance with BBC results.
No 1/4 Yes 5/2
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 11 April 2010 13:48 (fifteen years ago)
Selling off some real estate and a chain of betting shops that probably shouldn't be owned by the state in the first place isn't really what I had in mind.
(xpost)
― Matt DC, Sunday, 11 April 2010 13:48 (fifteen years ago)
they could privatise the banks, i suppose
― joe, Sunday, 11 April 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)
I think there's some sense in the Tote being a public company tbh.
― What this place needs is an LCD Soundsystem thread (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 11 April 2010 13:53 (fifteen years ago)
the shortest constituency for bnp is 7/2 in barking then 12/1 stoke-on-trent central
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 11 April 2010 13:54 (fifteen years ago)
can you bet on that at the tote?
― alpha zingdog (history mayne), Sunday, 11 April 2010 13:59 (fifteen years ago)
sort of misleading to focus on tote etc given 82% of the headline figure is unspecified real estate
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 11 April 2010 14:01 (fifteen years ago)
tote 3/1 bnp gain seat(s), typical govt generosity
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 11 April 2010 14:03 (fifteen years ago)
thought of man utd longer odds to win league than bnp in parliament o_0
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 11 April 2010 14:16 (fifteen years ago)
Also: Labour longer odds to win the election.
― Ismael Klata, Sunday, 11 April 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)
Delightful:
Thought for the day: Proprietors are not allowed to ban gayers, but they are allowed to ban kids.
― James Mitchell, Sunday, 11 April 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)
gayer than...what?
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Sunday, 11 April 2010 16:14 (fifteen years ago)
straighters, presumably
― you've been shite, son, in your daft pink boots (onimo), Sunday, 11 April 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.thestraightchoice.org/image.php?s=l&i=c6182957d559abe43a01ef8bab1b6b88
― Ned Trifle II, Sunday, 11 April 2010 17:16 (fifteen years ago)
Courtesy of Andrew Charalambous - wouldn't want you thinking it was a BNP leaflet.
― Ned Trifle II, Sunday, 11 April 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)
He looks like MiniMe
― Convenience Fish (snoball), Sunday, 11 April 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)
is that a bnp poster?
oh right
― alpha zingdog (history mayne), Sunday, 11 April 2010 17:35 (fifteen years ago)
can't you tell by the font? it's forever 1987 in toryworld
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 11 April 2010 17:38 (fifteen years ago)
str8 bullshit
― the big pink suede panda bear hurts (ledge), Sunday, 11 April 2010 19:12 (fifteen years ago)
Not if you include Iraq and Afghanistan surely?
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Sunday, 11 April 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)
Utterly stupid and avoidable clanger from Labour
― Matt DC, Sunday, 11 April 2010 22:33 (fifteen years ago)
I doubt they deliberately targeted cancer patients but did the idea that this might happen really not occur to anyone?
― Matt DC, Sunday, 11 April 2010 22:34 (fifteen years ago)
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Sunday, 11 April 2010 19:47 (2 hours ago)
important post imo
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Sunday, 11 April 2010 22:39 (fifteen years ago)
i know that significant majority might feel that not voting labour is throwing the baby out with the bathwater, but y'know, sometimes the baby's a little cunt
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Sunday, 11 April 2010 22:40 (fifteen years ago)
you were on that funny thread
― conrad, Sunday, 11 April 2010 22:43 (fifteen years ago)
wtf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCO-KwYpH0M
― James Mitchell, Monday, 12 April 2010 11:24 (fifteen years ago)
Reduce the age of voting to five.
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Monday, 12 April 2010 11:28 (fifteen years ago)
it's the triumph of the innocent smoothies aesthetic. a little knitted hat, headbutting the human face, forever.
― joe, Monday, 12 April 2010 11:30 (fifteen years ago)
how does a new industrial revolution sound?
child labour? fuck yeah!political repression? fuck yeah!widespread immiseration? fuck yeah!
― alpha zingdog (history mayne), Monday, 12 April 2010 11:35 (fifteen years ago)
Can only watch that with the sound down, but I rather liked it. That long bike with eight policemen on it was really good I thought.
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 12 April 2010 11:50 (fifteen years ago)
Manifesto by David Shrigley or Purple Ronnie?
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 12 April 2010 11:53 (fifteen years ago)
And there are moments of embarrassment. I had no idea how many men open the front door stark naked. ‘Congratulations,’ I said to the first one. ‘You’re my first nude.’ The bits I could see above the letter box blushed prettily.The second male nude was pierced so unexpectedly that I was rendered completely speechless.I just grabbed my leaflets and ran away.
The second male nude was pierced so unexpectedly that I was rendered completely speechless.
I just grabbed my leaflets and ran away.
― James Mitchell, Monday, 12 April 2010 11:55 (fifteen years ago)
The youtube comments are quite sweet, only one zing:
123cameronc At last, some positive advertising about Labour! wonderful stuff, lets just hope that we can do enough to stop Cameron messing it up! mondjahr It's sooo cool! My kids (3 and 6, respectivily) are loving it. I'm waiting with expectation to watch the version for adults. Marnerbanana nice one!MrCameronsucks Good Luck Labour! Let's hope people don't have short term memories and remember what the country was like under conservative rule! Abi2418 Really funny! Very well made! leebzmuir I like the Idea of this stuartbrucepr Fantastic snapshot that illustrate real Labour values
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 12 April 2010 12:04 (fifteen years ago)
xpif i knew rantzen was coming round i'd get me kit off
― henri grenouille (Frogman Henry), Monday, 12 April 2010 12:08 (fifteen years ago)
Something about Cameron zinging anyone else for possible lack of "moral compass" (on Matt DC's BBC news link from yesterday) is putting me off my lunch.
― falling while carrying an owl (a passing spacecadet), Monday, 12 April 2010 12:10 (fifteen years ago)
So the Labour manifesto conflates Crime and Immigration into one section. Fucking indefensible pandering dicks.
― Matt DC, Monday, 12 April 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)
by this point i have no idea who i'm voting for at all
― gucci magnet (acoleuthic), Monday, 12 April 2010 13:28 (fifteen years ago)
So the Labour manifesto conflates Crime and Immigration into one section.
Haven't seen this yet, but maybe they're just treating them as Home Office issues?
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Monday, 12 April 2010 13:37 (fifteen years ago)
yes
― caek, Monday, 12 April 2010 13:56 (fifteen years ago)
depressinghttp://www.voterpower.org.uk/
― i would just like to point out that i have been antimony on this thread (onimo), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)
In Hull North, one person does not really have one vote, they have the equivalent of 0.066 votes.
Won't feel so bad about writing FUCK THE LOT OF YOU on my ballot now.
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:19 (fifteen years ago)
0.216 votes! Result. Seems like an underestimation of the potential for SNP swing, though.
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)
0.226
i don't really understand the maths behind this though
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)
0.088
It's just how safe the seat is, no?
― Colonel Poo, Monday, 12 April 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)
Note "The average UK voter only has the power of 0.253 votes". Voters in Oxford East have 3.17x more voting power than the UK average. So I'm voting in one of the most marginal seats in the country and I've still got less than a vote.
― caek, Monday, 12 April 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)
this all sounds like bs to me
i have a fucken vote
that i might use or not
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)
It's some obscurantist, retweetable nonsense about PR.
oh you crazy democracies. we just get builders to pick our govt.
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)
The Tories will today present their vision of a Britain made-up of self-reliant people with greater control of their own lives who don't like all them Afghans coming over here and stinking up the place.The party's manifesto will set out plans to build a society of self-governing racists who will finally be able to get on the housing ladder 'cause all them fuzzy wuzzies have been stopped at Dover and thrown back into the sea.
The party's manifesto will set out plans to build a society of self-governing racists who will finally be able to get on the housing ladder 'cause all them fuzzy wuzzies have been stopped at Dover and thrown back into the sea.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 08:50 (fifteen years ago)
wow it's like a british onion
oh no, it's shit sub-radio 4 6.30pm slot gash
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 09:01 (fifteen years ago)
You say that like it's mutually exclusive.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 09:48 (fifteen years ago)
Er, not to come over all jezebel.com, but 'gash'? Really?
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 09:54 (fifteen years ago)
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/files/2010/04/keane.jpg
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 12:49 (fifteen years ago)
My first thought was that that was a complaint about the music by someone attending the launch.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
'will not vote for party whose leader i resemble all too much'
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
First Carmodist conspiracy theory of the campaign? (xp)
― Bauhaus, in the middle of our street (King Boy Pato), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 12:53 (fifteen years ago)
It's a relief that Keane flopped last time round. But do not be misled: their real power, their real, horrific victory, is yet to come. By comparison to such things, pop should not matter at all.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 12:57 (fifteen years ago)
George Galloway entourage 'attacked by Islamic pupils'
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:19 (fifteen years ago)
QTF
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/4/13/1271156041597/Ukips-2010-election-poste-008.jpg
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)
Loving their logo. Very Poundstretcher.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:25 (fifteen years ago)
Is there a different phone number for gay chat btw?
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:26 (fifteen years ago)
u kip if u want to
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:28 (fifteen years ago)
UKIP: IF UFEEL SLEEPY
― conrad, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:37 (fifteen years ago)
they did their manifesto launch simultaneously with the tories?
that's genius media planning
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:38 (fifteen years ago)
constructive interference
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:39 (fifteen years ago)
like how their photos look like they were badly scanned from a 30 yr old newspaper
I think the word "Sod" there came from an old PIL bootleg.
― Mark G, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:47 (fifteen years ago)
does kinda remind of some post-punk era diy fanzine graphics, as reimagined by whichever diabetic retired actuary from carshalton does press for ukip
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:49 (fifteen years ago)
It now seems that Nick Griffin is to be flanked everywhere he goes by a man dressed in British Army uniform. But as ever with the BNP all is not as it would seem to be, the man dressed as a soldier is the BNP’s own Adam Walker who is also standing as an MP for the BNP in County Durham
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 08:42 (fifteen years ago)
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2701/4519665343_3a745083f3.jpg
This is better from Labour, I think. The stuff about the role of the state in the Tory manifesto leaves them pretty open to attack I think, "civic engagement" as opposed to government support could very easily be spun into "loads of people will be left high and dry". Which is possibly because it's true.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 08:46 (fifteen years ago)
Perhaps a little runic/cryptic tho?
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 08:48 (fifteen years ago)
If Labour don't hammer it home at every opportunity throughout the campaign then they probably don't deserve to win the election.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 08:51 (fifteen years ago)
I have no idea what that "If you're there for him" thing is referring to.
― caek, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 09:24 (fifteen years ago)
voting presumably?
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 09:25 (fifteen years ago)
I guess.
― caek, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 09:26 (fifteen years ago)
Needs sexing up.
the line of attack is correct i think, but perhaps could be a little more direct
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 09:27 (fifteen years ago)
if you're there for him, he'll dismember every living thing is nuneaton
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 09:29 (fifteen years ago)
*in
I think the 'if you're there for him' possibly refers to this people's government thing Cameron's pushing - in conservative phrasing, reducing central government, devolving responsibility (or some such thing), handing power back to the people, local independence; in leftist phrasing, removing state support structures, putting financial decisions into private, corporate hands etc.
Hence the phrase, I guess, but yes, that slogan feels more productive of a furrowed brow and a 'how many letters?' than tapping decisive ideological feelings.
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 10:04 (fifteen years ago)
Did anyone see ITV's VoxPop bit regarding how the Cons have this idea about letting people set up their own schools?
People in a park going "Oh yes, I'd like to be a part of setting up our own school, we couldn't do a worse job could we?"
OH REALLY? YOU THINK SO?
― Mark G, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 10:11 (fifteen years ago)
pretty excited about running a hospital!
― caek, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 10:22 (fifteen years ago)
pussies, im setting up a gd air force
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 10:24 (fifteen years ago)
luftmenschwaffe
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 10:26 (fifteen years ago)
I was pleased to hear Cam'ron say that the running of hospitals and schools will be changed in the same way the running of the phone network was. Need more competitive prices in those markets, for sure.
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 10:29 (fifteen years ago)
Billy Hague came off SO BADLY yesterday, banging on about this. He was ranting on Radio4 saying people were sick and tired of government targets and bureaucracy, so "off you go and run the schools yourselves". WHAT? If you *are* the government, can't you just errrrr get rid of the targets and paperwork? He might as well have just said "oh stuff it, do health and education yourselves, cos we can't be fricken arsed".
Clever interviewer pointed out that a lot of people setting up their own schools are doing so VERY reluctantly...
― Zoe Espera, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 11:01 (fifteen years ago)
hague still sounds like a teenager putting on an adult voice to get served in a pub, such a weird fella.
― a rhetorical style that implies an unwritten "now taste my ass" (stevie), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 11:07 (fifteen years ago)
And, yet, when he was at school (I'm told, by his former teachers), he was like an old man trapped in a 12-year-old's body.
― Zoe Espera, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 11:18 (fifteen years ago)
Remind me which Gov brought in the National Curriculum?
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 11:58 (fifteen years ago)
And SATs
― Zoe Espera, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 12:01 (fifteen years ago)
Both of which yr new "let's do the show right here" community religious mentalist hate schools wd still have to adhere to, I imagine
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 12:02 (fifteen years ago)
suspect it's more about further weakening the bargaining position of teacher unions than setting schools free of central control.
― joe, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 12:07 (fifteen years ago)
I wd love to think it's about that but really? does any gov really care about the NUT any more?
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 12:09 (fifteen years ago)
Or is it about money? How are these new schools going to be funded? Have to admit, haven't read the smallprint...
― Zoe Espera, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 12:15 (fifteen years ago)
xpost i just can't think of anything else it's likely to achieve? the tories are still very prescriptive about curriculum issues, everyone's got to learn their kings and queens etc. but keeping the teacher wage bill down is going to be a priority for the next few years, so taking more schools out of the central bargaining process has got to appeal.
― joe, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 12:19 (fifteen years ago)
Oh:
"We will move to a national per pupil funding system, so that new schools get paid if they attract pupils, with extra funding for the poorest pupils (a pupil premium)."
― Zoe Espera, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 12:22 (fifteen years ago)
i think it's a cheap gesture to right-wing nutjobs plus it gets more schools out of the clutches of the evil LEAs - the Tories seem to be more antipathetic to those, as potential non-Tory power structures - than the Unions (let's be honest, it's just the one Union) who they must be pretty confident they could face down in a strike bearing in mind the GB public's historic regard for Guardian-reading teachers.
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 12:22 (fifteen years ago)
Lib Dem manifesto opposes a war no one is seriously proposing to fight. You were right about Iraq, we get it.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 12:34 (fifteen years ago)
Both main parties' policies on schools are completely batshit. I really feel for everyone with kids right now.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 12:35 (fifteen years ago)
I don't wanna go into all the aggravations on here but I will say our Joel is at least having a good time at secondary school.
System really needs dynamiting and starting again but obv that wd be more disruption for poor sods going thru it right now
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 12:37 (fifteen years ago)
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong (I don't have kids in school yet), but I thought primary schools were pretty good these days? I say this just having had the chance to compare primary education in Madrid with primary ed in London. Madrid: blackboard, lots of copying, lots of shouting, bored kids, kids written off the minute they walk through the door, NO provision for special needs WHATSOEVER. London: kids "on task", teacher finding 6 million ways to teach to cater for diff learning styles, special ed provision, blah blah blah. I know where I'd want to send my kids, anyway.
Having said that:
Madrid: happy teachersLondon: suicidal teachers
I just can't see this tory "run yer own skool" idea really getting that many voters excited.
― Zoe Espera, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 12:44 (fifteen years ago)
No question there are good teachers out there, the system they're working in looks horrendous and wrong-headed to me tho.
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 12:49 (fifteen years ago)
the system kids they're working in with looks horrendous and wrong-headed to me tho.
fixed!
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 12:53 (fifteen years ago)
as much as almost anything, schools have the potential to make kids
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 13:01 (fifteen years ago)
Modern sex education really has gone too far.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 13:05 (fifteen years ago)
damnit beaten to it
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 13:05 (fifteen years ago)
― Matt DC, Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:34 PM (28 minutes ago) Bookmark
it's kind of a dumm commitment/hostage to fortune anyway. if iran becomes a threat (not outside the realms of possibility) then the lib dem leader is left holding his dick because s/he can't even threaten force.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 13:08 (fifteen years ago)
who wd we have left to send, the Brownies?
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 13:09 (fifteen years ago)
Then again, Vietnam happened without the UK being involved.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 13:10 (fifteen years ago)
even hawkish old me wouldn't call north vietnam a threat
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 13:11 (fifteen years ago)
It was filmed in Docklands iirc
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 13:12 (fifteen years ago)
Who IS "run yr own schools!" aimed at? Thought at first it might be home-schooling parents, but I s'pose they're fundamentally not interested in other people's kids, who are all nasty and should be kept away from at all costs.
― falling while carrying an owl (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 13:57 (fifteen years ago)
kids!
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 13:59 (fifteen years ago)
the "new" Conservative argument these days really is just "a thousand points of light" isn't it? bullshit now, bullshit then
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thousand_points_of_light
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 14:03 (fifteen years ago)
I can categorically say that if you elect me as Prime Minister we will not, under any circumstances, go to war with Andorra.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 14:05 (fifteen years ago)
yeah but how can we trust you on that?
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 14:09 (fifteen years ago)
You were right about Iraq, we get it.
Can't blame them for trying this though, given that it was enough to get Obama elected.
― niminy-piminy cricket (Upt0eleven), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 14:32 (fifteen years ago)
xpost: And will you 'make Britain better', preferably without ever defining your terms?
― Zoe Espera, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 14:34 (fifteen years ago)
They haven't said they'll make it better, they've said they're going to "change" it.
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 14:39 (fifteen years ago)
But that was the BBC front page headline yesterday, with quotes round it.
Change/make better: very very different generaltothepointofmeaningless concepts.
― Zoe Espera, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 14:43 (fifteen years ago)
"Change" is nicely sinister.
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 14:49 (fifteen years ago)
With a shitty incumbent, vague 'change' sounds are good enough for the electorate a lot of the time- that's the danger?
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 14:59 (fifteen years ago)
They clearly chose the word "change" remembering that a change is as good as a rest. Fits in nicely with the "run yer own country while we sip Champagne" policy.
― Zoe Espera, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)
I really feel for everyone with kids right now.
Thanks, but you don't need to really. Both our kids - one primary, other high school are getting a great rounded education. I rarely meet any disgruntled parents. I mean there's always one or two, but seriously they would always find something to whine about. Call this a computer! My child is a genius and needs more maths! These chairs are too small! I think there's been definite visible improvements (of course I Am A Labour Stan And Not To Be Trusted but it wasn't that long ago we were being asked to chip for books). So far education (from my limited experience) has really not been an issue this election. It's all been about the economy (with a bit of immigration thrown in) with the emphasis on the "National Debt", which the tories seem to be hammering home at the moment - as I would if I were them.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)
Yes, and that's tied to "Brown has engineered the worst slump of the last 50 years" or whatever. While there are plenty of accurate criticisms you can level at Brown - both as PM and as Chancellor - in the way the UK economy was structured, this particular line of attack seems pretty weak. Every nation in the world suffered massively due to the malfeasance of the corporate titans. The national debt is bad because of the stimulus required to lift spending. Every nation is dealing with this.
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 15:40 (fifteen years ago)
fuckin' bullshit: london was pretty much the epicentre of the corporate malfeasance/casino banking of the 00s. regulation was even looser than in GWB's america: hence the american firms that set up here. it's not a "weak line" to attack along... unless you're the tories, who would have done the exact same thing had they been in charge.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)
Tories' main advantage here is "it didn't happen on our watch" and Labour's only riposte is "ah but it would have, and worse!"
I saw Brown on some Q&A the other week and he pulled some weak shit along the lines of "The Tories would have opposed the stringent and necessary banking regulations we uh... should have introduced... but didn't..."
― i would just like to point out that i have been antimony on this thread (onimo), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)
ha surely it's a case of 'WE were right OBVIOUSLY ffs' plus there have been noises about Iran in the media and from gov over the years for it to be worth mentioning really
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)
unless you're the tories, who would have done the exact same thing had they been in charge.
Well exactly. Pretty much every modern managerial party tries to make life easy for the big dogs. Though what you say is true that London was among the worst of the worst. My point is that every country has suffered a monumental recession and every country has run up huge deficits trying to contain it, so the argument that Brown caused all this falls a little flat. What, Brown's responsible for Mexico's recession now, too?
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)
I'm pretty sure every country is blaming its own leader for the economic wotsits. Opposition parties can really capitalise on this kind of parrochialism.
― Zoe Espera, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:21 (fifteen years ago)
completely psittacotic isn't it
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
mynah threat
― pretty girl, filking a clown (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
the libdem 'commitment' re iran is stupid but their opposition to the iraq war should still be counted in their favour
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
yeah. i voted for 'em in 2005 p much coz of that. i wasn't going to vote labour. probably not going to vote at all this time.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)
i hate to get jaggery on your thread, and i know i've asked this qn before, and gotten the answer "lol we dunno", but, what is the point of the libdems existence? idgi
― goole, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)
you know you've made it when yr an ilx strawman
― pretty girl, filking a clown (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:03 (fifteen years ago)
the point of the lib dems is to give students someone to vote for
― pretty girl, filking a clown (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)
jaggery-pukery
― conrad, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)
jaggery is actually an indian drink, made from milk and spices iirc
― pretty girl, filking a clown (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)
*puke*
― conrad, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:07 (fifteen years ago)
― pretty girl, filking a clown (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:11 (fifteen years ago)
Jaggery is actually boiled cane juice, like a brown sugar with a really distinctive taste.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)
OK, not voting is just some straight-up bullshit.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaggery
was gonna mention
tbh learning two or three new facts about jaggery from that article felt like time better spent than the five minutes i was going to spend refreshing newspapers + news.bbc + forum for more meaningless election details (Nick Clegg "yet to decide" on debate neckwear)
― thomp, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:21 (fifteen years ago)
Jaggery pokery, innit.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:22 (fifteen years ago)
for some reason i thought it was a variant on lassee, saw it on a menu years ago
― pretty girl, filking a clown (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)
No. There comes a point when all the choices are too heinous to vote for. I make a point of going to the polling booth and not voting, if that helps, but this "vote for the least evil" line won't fly sometimes.
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:35 (fifteen years ago)
Then you write in. Too many people died for your right to suffrage, and mine.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)
Too many people died for your right to suffrage, and mine.
not that many for mine tbh
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:38 (fifteen years ago)
Suzy we don't have write-in candidates. My "write-in" = spoiling my ballot paper. No matter what your tactical intentions are when you vote, it registers as support for the party you vote for. There's nobody standing in this election who I'm prepared to support. (I might behave differently if I lived in a marginal.)
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)
No matter what your tactical intentions are when you vote, it registers as support for the party you vote for
yeah but so what. this is a general election, not an ILM poll!
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)
kinda think that makes it more important not to congratulate the Labour party on their sterling work these last 13 years.
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)
id probably vote if the tories had a chance here, but they don't, so it's LD vs labour and im not *that* arsed either way. i actually like the idea of moving the tax burden from the poor to the rich, whereas -- this was just before lehmann bros collapsed iirc -- labour made the brilliant move during the parliament of moving it in the other direction.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)
during this parliament
Get yrself one background to the Representation of the People Act, or ask your great grandfather ffs.
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)
id probably vote if the tories had a chance here, but they don't, so it's LD vs labour and im not *that* arsed either way.
isn't is possible for the tories to come out on top in this way?
― goole, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, April 14, 2010 6:44 PM (26 seconds ago) Bookmark
well, pretty sure my grandfather wasn't around at peterloo, but to try to lassoo the radical tradition into this... just no. voting helps legitimize the normal business of state -- expropriation, surveillance, etc. man.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:48 (fifteen years ago)
yeah was gonna point out that people might well've been giving their lives for the wrong tactical decision.
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:50 (fifteen years ago)
it's an unimaginably different world, but im p sure those who died (& were justified) were after more than a quinquennial poll to decide who among the ruling elite gets their hands on the steering wheel. in theory maybe having a "labour party" would have changed that... but, um, yeah.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:54 (fifteen years ago)
feel like i need 2 read this:
http://fernwoodpublishing.ca/website_covers/9781552662878.jpg
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:56 (fifteen years ago)
cameron in the middle of a friendly crowd on the bbc news channel talking about padded bras for seven-year-olds
― conrad, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:56 (fifteen years ago)
History of the Labour Party = well-meaning Liberals striving to curb the worst excesses of lumpen proles
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:57 (fifteen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/None_of_the_above
― caek, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:57 (fifteen years ago)
Oh that bikini is all over the front of the Sun. presumably the bird on Page 3 isn't wearing one.
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:58 (fifteen years ago)
the bird of about seven?
― conrad, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)
One could argue that the Sun is A-OK with sexualising popular culture when it suits.
I haven't seen this bikini and on one level it's a bit o_O but on another level people have to bring their own OMG PAEDOS reaction to it.
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 18:01 (fifteen years ago)
LOLLLLLL Dad Miliband.
Nobody's trying to lasso a radical tradition into anything here, not even you, HM. I just feel that if you vote, you're a citizen and if you don't, you're a subject.
I guess in the current situ you have to be local about your vote - is your MP good for constituents, for example? I can't vote in UK elections obvs, but would vote for my local Lab MP even though I'm disappointed w/Labour generally.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 18:01 (fifteen years ago)
If your 7-year-old requires boob padding, you've got a bigger problem than having to shop at Primark.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 18:03 (fifteen years ago)
don't quite know how to take that
― conrad, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 18:04 (fifteen years ago)
can you vote in any UK elections, suzy/tracer?
― caek, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 18:04 (fifteen years ago)
Voting for a Labour candidate on this go round wd feel like voting for the continuing destruction of what's left of the party to me, so no amount of regard for my right to participate in my own subjection is gonna swing this one.
Also kids like to dress up, innit? I wd probably refuse to buy one for my kid even if they pleaded but there's a world of nuance and debate around the "sexualization" of children and I'm not sure that Cameron or the Sun really trade in nuance.
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 18:06 (fifteen years ago)
i'm voting in a super-marginal lib/lab constituency. i've changed my mind to labour over the last couple of weeks because (i) lib will definitely win the constituency (ii) small gesture toward dampening the landslide narrative should the conservatives get a national majority. is this ridiculous?
― caek, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)
no - go to it
― conrad, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)
Like I said, I think my opinions might be tempered if I was in a marginal. Your logic doesn't sound unreasonable caek.
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)
i feel like i may have crossed the line from tactical to mental
― caek, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)
Good campaign slogan. 2010 - TIME TO GET MENTAL
― POLL closes: April 31st (in 100 years) (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 18:11 (fifteen years ago)
I can't vote in any of your elections, unless I decide to take UK citizenship. Pretty keen to hang onto US citizenship. I've seen that my vote matters in US context - one of my senators won by like 200 votes after a recount, remember? It just sucks that I can't vote for non-Federal state stuff as expat vote would have probably been the difference to nuke MN's idiot of a governor.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 18:13 (fifteen years ago)
i thought you got to vote in eu or elections. i guess that is only eu passport holders? (or i may well be making it up.)
― caek, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 18:14 (fifteen years ago)
My constituency is Bethnal Green & Bow, therefore I will basically be satisfied with any outcome as it can only be an improvement over George Galloway. Nationally I am hoping for a hung parliament so that maybe, just maybe the Lib Dems can force through some kind of electoral reform. Tories are a complete shower as per. Listening to the shit that was their manifesto made me more angry than I have felt in some time and I'm normally relatively apathetic towards party politics.
― ears are wounds, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 18:16 (fifteen years ago)
I believe you have to be EU or married to one to vote for mayors and MEPs (Tracer will know for sure).
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)
Pretty sure US citizens can't vote in any UK elections. You have to be Commonwealth or EU.
― Colonel Poo, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 18:19 (fifteen years ago)
I just feel that if you vote, you're a citizen and if you don't, you're a subject.
im a civilian yo [via 'starship troopers']
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 19:13 (fifteen years ago)
'via'
― caek, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 19:24 (fifteen years ago)
i'm voting in a super-marginal lib/lab constituency. i've changed my mind to labour over the last couple of weeks because (i) lib will definitely win the constituency
still pissed off at whoever saw fit to recarve Oxford from 1 urban* Lab constituency + 1 suburban Lib constituency to 1 marginal Lib vs Lab mishmash + 1 suburban and rural quite possibly Tory one (oh please god don't) tbh
* if anything in Oxford counts as "urban"
(which also makes me wonder: Cameron promises 10% fewer MPs? which ones, I wonder?)
― falling while carrying an owl (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:57 (fifteen years ago)
and rural quite possibly Tory one (oh please god don't) tbh
^^^ pretty sure this is so not going to happen.
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 09:40 (fifteen years ago)
http://imgur.com/uuVds.jpg
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 15 April 2010 11:10 (fifteen years ago)
Well, I like the Lib Dems' creative accounting. If they can bring back that Robin Hood, they'd surely get another couple of billion.
― Brian Keno (King Boy Pato), Thursday, 15 April 2010 11:18 (fifteen years ago)
btw if Nick Clegg's wife were an ILX poster, she'd be Moka
― Brian Keno (King Boy Pato), Thursday, 15 April 2010 11:36 (fifteen years ago)
why?
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 11:36 (fifteen years ago)
- feisty- Spanish- girl
― Brian Keno (King Boy Pato), Thursday, 15 April 2010 11:43 (fifteen years ago)
bring back dom
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 11:43 (fifteen years ago)
hmm, just got my student loan annual statement
aaaaaand that's when the idea of voting labour goes the fuck outta the window
kind of forget that owe a shit tonne of money most of the time
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 11:46 (fifteen years ago)
i don't open mine any more. i consider it bad luck.
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 11:48 (fifteen years ago)
paying 3.8% vig apparently
good thing im earning significantly more than non-graduates... oh right im not lol
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 11:50 (fifteen years ago)
the student loan company seem to have forgotten about me, so I guess I should be voting Labour with aplomb.
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Thursday, 15 April 2010 11:50 (fifteen years ago)
heh i risk garnering more suggest bans with another 'lol british' comment.
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:00 (fifteen years ago)
how is HE paid for in ireland?
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:03 (fifteen years ago)
^^^ open goal if someone wants it
xxxxp you should vote tory, iain duncan smith's promising no top up fees iirc.
― Earning your Masters in Library and Information Science is beautiful (schlump), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:04 (fifteen years ago)
man i need one of those "debt counter" things for my house, calculating how much more i owe this government of thugs, morons, and unelected fraudsters each day
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:05 (fifteen years ago)
oh burn... i'd better vote labour after all
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:06 (fifteen years ago)
what is the solution to this problem, nrq?
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:07 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, 15 April 2010 12:03 (4 minutes ago)
I dunno, it wasn't me anyway. You pay administration fees of about €750 a year but tuition etc is free. Just about everyone I know qualified for a maintenance grant that refunded the admin fees too iirc. It's been a few years.
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:09 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, Thursday, April 15, 2010 1:07 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark
idk they could "bail out" the indebted instead of lining the pockets of bankers and the arms industry?
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:10 (fifteen years ago)
buy fewer CDs
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:11 (fifteen years ago)
way ahead of you
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:11 (fifteen years ago)
charging HE to somewhere other than general taxation started before the banking crisis. it's not like it wouldn't have happened otherwise. totally opposed to bailing out me, you, bankers or the arms industry.
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:15 (fifteen years ago)
i support the general principle of the cost of first degree HE falling on its users rather than general taxation though, so we're probably speaking at crossed purposes here.
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:17 (fifteen years ago)
to darragh - what about money to live on? Tuition is free in Scotland too but my big piles of (hopefully dissolved) loans were spent on me and me alone.
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:17 (fifteen years ago)
maintenance grant of about 3000 for anyone whose family income falls below defined limits (again, just about everyone I know qualified, tho i didn't get it for two years for fairly ridiculous family reasons)
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:19 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, Thursday, April 15, 2010 1:17 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark
users nuh. beneficiaries maaaaybe. idk, everyone else gets subsidised, so why not students?
let's see how it plays out, inequality-wise -- kind of feel like imposing the fees was a classic boomer move.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:20 (fifteen years ago)
everyone else gets subsidised, so why not students?
sure, and 5k/PA loan + 3k/PA fees << cost of undegrad education.
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:26 (fifteen years ago)
Classic boomer move = removing an opportunity enjoyed by boomers, perchance?
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:34 (fifteen years ago)
ya-hah
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:56 (fifteen years ago)
those guys are dicks, agreed.
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:57 (fifteen years ago)
Cameron and Clegg are the last of the Student Grant generation so the former's family would have had plenty of extra dosh to pay his Bullers dues. Sad, isn't it?
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 13:10 (fifteen years ago)
reminds me i shd check in on what dangerous anti-fees protest dude will straw is up to
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 13:11 (fifteen years ago)
haha
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 13:11 (fifteen years ago)
crush on Clegg's wife here too
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 15 April 2010 13:14 (fifteen years ago)
What, were student grants not means-tested when Cameron was uni-age? Blimey.
― Colonel Poo, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:09 (fifteen years ago)
Cameron's 2 years older than me? Apart from that being depressing, grants were def means-tested when I was at uni.
― longer lasting, thicker elections (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:16 (fifteen years ago)
I remember people were able to claim housing benefit and dole when not in term-time, but that ended late '80s, yes?
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)
ladbrokes will give you 20/1 for "fire up the quattro"http://sports.ladbrokes.com/en-gb/politics/2010-uk-general-election/debate-specials-e213505549
― etrian odysseus (cozen), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)
ah shi, I never bet but was seriously tempted when I saw the 'what will they say?' a couple of days ago, but it makes more sense now. 'Immigration', for example, was at evens. Riches slipping through my fingers.
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Thursday, 15 April 2010 18:04 (fifteen years ago)
I'm going to actually watch escapist C4 telly tonight and then do the Newsnight recap, as I hate ITV.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)
I figure this is going to be a snore, I'm gonna go to the pub and hope to read about the surprise fist-fight in the morning.
― longer lasting, thicker elections (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 15 April 2010 18:13 (fifteen years ago)
LOLLLLLL Mandelson just doing ballroom dancing with some OLDS on C4 news.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)
lived with al4stair st3wart's son until a couple of years ago. heard him say some v. problematic things in: re: jim rosenth4l's religion during the grand prix once, and am hoping for that to come up should israel be mentioned tonight.
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 18:24 (fifteen years ago)
"him" = alastair, not the son
Cameron's 2 years older than me?
Huh, I am the same age as this man.http://info-wars.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Nigel-Farage_1409002c.jpg
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 15 April 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)
I have been dying to ask Mr S. Reyn0lds about his college take on Schmindie Dave.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:13 (fifteen years ago)
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, April 15, 2010 7:18 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
right?
shit yeah, grimey was at BNC wasn't he?
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:20 (fifteen years ago)
I'm going to watch the first half hour of the debate, then I'll be switching over to watch Children of Men at 9pm.
― New Hors d'œuvre (DavidM), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:22 (fifteen years ago)
HIMYM is on at 9.30 so
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)
stewart really is awful
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:33 (fifteen years ago)
Jesus what is with the retro set?
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:33 (fifteen years ago)
cameron looks like he's going to shit himself
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)
At least it isn't Trevor McDonald
― New Hors d'œuvre (DavidM), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)
precise words that I just said to the other half.
lol, they forgot to turn on Gordon's mic.
― ailsa, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)
what does "jobs tax" refer to?
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)
The National Insurance rise, I bet.
― carson dial, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
"black man"
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
yep
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
RACIAL PUPPETRY~!
― MPx4A, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
he looked like he didn't enjoy saying that
"40 year old black man" wtf?
I WAS TALKING TO A BLACK MAN
brown benefits from having a better voice, really, right of the bat
i mean, cameron went to eton and oxford, we all know, so why this weedy, mid-range voice?
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)
"right off the bat", i should of wrote
Gordon Brown has been speaking to people. He should maybe mention that some more.
― ailsa, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:44 (fifteen years ago)
cameron rattled by clegg or am i imagining things?
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:44 (fifteen years ago)
got 40 yr old black man at 33/1 from ladbrokes so I'm up some money
― etrian odysseus (cozen), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, Thursday, April 15, 2010 8:44 PM (18 seconds ago) Bookmark
he's certainly rattled
forgot that he actually worked for itv once (kinda)
his suspicious lack of facial hair/features also a problem for me
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)
cameron rattled by the "black man" thing I think
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)
where's the worm? would have liked to see the reaction to "40 year old black man"
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)
who talked to a black man?
clegg doing pretty well in 'sure you have no idea who i am but fuck voting for these two, aimirite?'
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)
"i was born" well done question asker.
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)
cameron talked to a 40 year old black man iirc
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)
how long is this? Wondering how long Cameron can keep in check his instinct to be a smug bullying prick when he smells blood
― MPx4A, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:49 (fifteen years ago)
Gordon just did the exact face from the election poster for half a second
brown is starting to make me nervous
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:49 (fifteen years ago)
brown chuckling for no reason and writing stuff down
jon stewart style
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:49 (fifteen years ago)
Pourquoi?
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:50 (fifteen years ago)
talking over the others during immigration + giggling NAGL
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)
he went to a drug rehab centre!
he met a young man!
was he... black?
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)
lol at the drug rehab in centre in whitney
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)
yobs -> colleges of crime -> murderers in our midst
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)
yeah wtf cameron with every answer being joe the plumber
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)
this personal anecdote stuff from all of them is ridic
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:53 (fifteen years ago)
young people could "get off the streets" by joining internet msg boards <---- my low-cost initiative
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:53 (fifteen years ago)
Cam's out there, mixing it with all sorts: black men, young men... real people.
― New Hors d'œuvre (DavidM), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)
suggest ban criminals
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)
was that a tear in cameron's eye?
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)
It was that time he had an open house after Carnival, and black guy was a dude he has listed in his phone as Dr. Ugs. William Hague turned up with his hat, with extra skins and fags.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)
let us wage war on the young man
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)
nick clegg met a young man in london!
*shot*
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:55 (fifteen years ago)
will cameron bring up his son in re: NHS question?
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:55 (fifteen years ago)
i thought the rule was no audience reaction shots?
oh dear
nb Clegg just said "just commit more crime" in the exact same cadence as "donk d-donk donk donk"
― MPx4A, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)
lol lord ashcroft zing
― etrian odysseus (cozen), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)
1 way to win the war and take yuts off the streets - take away the free comdoms, encourage stay inside fucking, and then bring back national service for the future overpopulated country
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)
oh jesus "I went to a Hull police station the other day" SHUT UP
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)
cameron just dissed noodle's lex-drivin' po-po
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:57 (fifteen years ago)
"He was a smarmy bully who regularly threatened journalists. He loved humiliating people, including a colleague at ITV he would abuse publicly as 'Bunter', just because the poor bloke was a few pounds overweight.
"He was a mouthpiece for that company's charmless chairman, Michael Green, who operated him the way Keith Harris works Orville."
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:57 (fifteen years ago)
"Policeman spent money on 1 lexus!" Ummm... would this 1 car be for someone going undercover? Why the fuck else would this happen? Would you like PC Plodd turning up as Stringer Bell's bezzy mate in his cop car?
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:57 (fifteen years ago)
Just checking they're still awake.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:58 (fifteen years ago)
Is he not the inspiration for smarmy arse on Drop The Dead Donkey?
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:58 (fifteen years ago)
this is a shambles
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:58 (fifteen years ago)
ITV
― etrian odysseus (cozen), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:59 (fifteen years ago)
rather
― conrad, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:59 (fifteen years ago)
itv.com
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:59 (fifteen years ago)
drinking game - every time a story is validated by the mention of an actual real conversation with an actual real person, take a drink. Let's see if anyone's still alive by 9.30
― ailsa, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)
"i had parents"
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)
ducks are nice
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)
they deserve high quality housing
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)
major lols at this thread. good luck UK
― p-dog, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)
I hope they have Andy Townsend punditing during the break
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)
is this on c-span or anything?
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)
no ad breaks iirc
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)
clegg you have used this line in the last 10mi
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)
min
ASHCROFT
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)
get the big money out of politics!!!
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)
are you mad?
― conrad, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)
cameron is on p solid ground saying ehhhh you could have done this in the last 13 years
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, cameron slamming gordon on this q
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)
LOL the ties are very CMYK
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)
These cost-saving measures - maybe they could open up the House of Lords as a B&B or something?
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)
the money was just resting in nick clegg's account
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)
b-b-but Gordon will make the Lords "much more smaller"
― ailsa, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)
brown doing terribly tbh
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)
It's what they always suggest on Country House Rescue. xpost
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)
Can ITV do anything that isn't brightly overlit, with a shiny floor? Where's Ant & Dec?
― New Hors d'œuvre (DavidM), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, Thursday, April 15, 2010 9:06 PM (21 seconds ago) Bookmark
you reckon? a bit tooo much smiling, but i think he's doing ok.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)
he's very stumbly
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)
really don't like cameron's face
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)
They were suggesting that on Country House Rescue just before I switched over to this!
― ailsa, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)
Nick Clegg wants to be Stone Cold Steve Austin as special guest referee at Judgment Day 98
― MPx4A, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)
has anybody mentioned Peter Mandelson yet?
stewart seeking clarification bit odd
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)
http://i42.tinypic.com/mhc41i.jpg
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:09 (fifteen years ago)
perhaps Nick Clegg is Portsmouth pointlessly defeating Spurs in the FA Cup Semi-Final.
― MPx4A, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:09 (fifteen years ago)
lol at this guy reading from a script
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)
need a grab of when Cam asked Clegg "who paid back the money?"
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)
can't be fucked going to tv and itv streaming is recaching furiously
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)
Did it have fireworks and that takeover-bloke?
jew! :D
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)
really hope cameron says "i was asked a question by a young jew" next week
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)
YOU WENT TO ETON
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)
I met a young jewish student the other day...
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)
http://zattoo.com/ for solid stream for uk people
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)
STATE SCHOOL
oh you cunt
god i hate cameron's face so much.
"get this"
― p-dog, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)
lol at "get this"
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)
peep dis
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)
it's a ritual divorce
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)
Do we have "My wife's pregnant" on the debate bingo card, because that one got shoehorned in there.
― ailsa, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)
think GB is doing pretty well here?
― p-dog, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
someone needs to drop the ETON bomb
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
THEN PEOPLE CAN LEARN
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
"how dear government, which is doing p. successfully btw, pay attention to how schools are run! they even give them so reading to do! and rules! who wants their kids having some discipline and rules? not me! thats why i sent my kids to eton, because they are better than you."
"one school excluded a kid for bringing a knife to school and then how dear they let him back in because it was for a cookery class!"
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, brown doing better on this q, but clegg crushing it now
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)
so big THEY'RE ILLEGAL
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)
as big as [-------------------------]^210
wow those teachers are witty!
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)
"department of soft furnishings and YOU GET 20 WEEKS HOLIDAY A YEAR SHUT UP"
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)
"education quangos" what does this even mean?
ppl running shit making sure their building wasn't falling down when their job is regulating and improving schools? bah! a mudhut would have only cost a tenner!
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)
Did cameron basically say to the school kid asking the question that it is school kid's own fault that the education system is fucked cos they are always knifing teachers and that?
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4046/4305774473_1312043b6a.jpg
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)
ehhh there probably are some ridic quangos in education -- definitely are in health
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
<3 cams 'ok so you are right but recession gordon! recession!'
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
i went to that school! it's fucking shit!
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)
stewart is cack as chair
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)
he is v. creepy
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)
itv s0 shit
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)
brown grinning like he has a clever answer to the 100 businessmen. bet it's excruciating.
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)
"we need companies to cut out waste" ummmmmm... where has cameron been the past 3 years?
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)
Both oppo leaders smugly pointing out their kids go to excellent state run schools = "well done Labour on the excellent schools!"
― i would just like to point out that i have been antimony on this thread (onimo), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:22 (fifteen years ago)
ummm shouldn't we be firing these drunk civil servants?
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)
clegg pretty smart answer.
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)
Brown sounding so much more confident now he's on the economy.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)
The school the Camerons use is the big C of E one next to Kensington tube - attached to a church, which parents should probably go to. Michael Gove's kids go too and Mrs Gove took over the Sunday school class to show how religious they were. She and hubby are basically atheist, though.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)
sam still killing it
Was walking back from bingo when some cabbie shouted out: "Heading home for the election debate, Big Sam?" I yelled back: "Yep - if 'election debate' is another term for having a wank on a bean bag while listening to 'Dark Side of the Moon'"The rascal tooted his horn then punched the air. Big Sam's honesty is like a cool tonic on a hot summers night.
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)
lolololol
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)
cameron just repeated himself word for word on that stupid "£1 in 100" thing
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)
For a moment I thought maybe the Cameron sprogs might go to a school in Witney, but silly me
― falling while carrying an owl (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)
is there some sort of pattern to what order stewart is calling on them, or his he making it up?
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)
I think it is just random.
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)
Territorial!
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:31 (fifteen years ago)
get the violins out for gordon
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)
killing time by pretending you can't see the questioner is pretty weak
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:33 (fifteen years ago)
heh "do do"
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:33 (fifteen years ago)
itv stream has given up for me now, but this thread is much more entertaining tbh, keep me updated guys
― falling while carrying an owl (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
hahaha
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
stream at zattoo
STOP BEING MAWKISH
wonder how Clegg will do the whole LUV THE ARMY thing
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
this is a ridiculously detailed story about the differences between british and american jeeps
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)
i think being "mawkish" about people who die because the democratically elected government sends them to war is the acceptable face of populism, lj
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:36 (fifteen years ago)
why didn't cameron shave his upper lip?
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:36 (fifteen years ago)
Geez, these guys are maxing out my brave-o-meter here.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
this is a ridiculously detailed story about the differences between british and american jeeps― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, April 15, 2010 9:35 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, April 15, 2010 9:35 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
thread title if lib dems win the election
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
zattoo stream struggling - i'm about a minute behind now
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
Has Dave forgotten that there's a strategic defence review coming out this summer?
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
― ears are wounds, Thursday, April 15, 2010 9:36 PM (19 seconds ago) Bookmark
it's more like why doesn't the rest of his face have hair?
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, i think i'm about 30 secs behind on zattoo too, but the video is solid
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
brave brave brave brilliant brilliant brave brave brave
― i would just like to point out that i have been antimony on this thread (onimo), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
did u know nick clegg is from the city of sheffield
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
so bloody brave
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
people like sheffield
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
CHINA?
hahaha other countries "unilaterally" have nukes, we have them by mutual consent
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
China?
xp ha
― p-dog, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
nuclear war with china you guys
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
People who have nuclear weapons are totally brave.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)
Clegg slaying them on the Trident issue.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)
Cameron sounding 100x more Eton for the military vote
― falling while carrying an owl (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)
this is fuckin waste
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)
kind of admire clegg on trident coz imo most people out there, deep down, like the idea of us having the real heavy shit
so idk if he is slaying it...
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)
he is, but i don't think trident is a massive votewinner
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)
love this "taleban changed their tactics, which i always think is rather unsporting" approach
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:42 (fifteen years ago)
seeing a lot of "pains me to say it but Clegg OTM" on Twitter
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)
"your incredible service to the nhs"
is this broad famous?
or is every1 in the nhs incredible?
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)
hahahahah
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)
nhs so brave
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)
bit over the top there
the non prolif rhetoric is uncannily like that re teenage pregnancy
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)
incredible broad
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)
nurses are incrediblesoldiers are braveteenagers are knife-wielding yobs
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)
cameron making a note of her name for his first new year's honours list
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)
xpostFamilies are hard working.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:46 (fifteen years ago)
― nakhchivan, Thursday, April 15, 2010 9:44 PM (42 seconds ago) Bookmark
loool
but rly though "owning the big stick" -- you don't need to have looked up freud on wiki to see how this issue plays
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:46 (fifteen years ago)
Clegg getting a nice zing at Cameron.
people fucking love the nhs, don't they?
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:47 (fifteen years ago)
it's like michael palin
clegg doing pretty well here
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)
sometimes an icbm is just an icbm
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, Thursday, April 15, 2010 9:47 PM (53 seconds ago) Bookmark
focus groups do
"i had a lady write to me"
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)
whaddit Bulgaria do wrong?
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)
the corner are going to be so disappointed by cameron's "expand the nhs" stuff
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:50 (fifteen years ago)
Oh, Clive Stone.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:50 (fifteen years ago)
unlucky cut for brown there
grinning and shaking his head while cameron talking about clive stone mbe's dead mates
this is such bullshit! clegg is basically right here
don't increase NI, instead buy cancer drukqz
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:51 (fifteen years ago)
ts: trident vs sutent
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)
didn't they do this one already?
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
don't like Cam being in the middle
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
booooring
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, Thursday, April 15, 2010 9:53 PM (0 seconds ago) Bookmark
lol young people
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
Wonder if they'll switch positions in subsequent debates.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
clegg would have looked a bit silly in the middle, and brown needs to on the right because he's a mong
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:54 (fifteen years ago)
i think brown get's right hand side every time because of his sight
ah, zattoo much better than itv stream, cheers - at least, it prioritises the audio (which i'm listening to) over the video (which i'm not really watching cz i'm reading ilx)
itv stream kept jumping back 2 seconds, which was not easing the repetitiveness inherent in listening to politicians
― falling while carrying an owl (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:54 (fifteen years ago)
the itv stream skipping at THE DRUGS HAVE GOT 2 B THERE WHEN U NEED THEM like some ardkore ish
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:54 (fifteen years ago)
stoked for brown's attempted joke in the closing statements
the main thing I'm getting from this is that I really don't want to have to watch Cameron for prolonged periods of time.
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:55 (fifteen years ago)
Stewart's gotta hurry them up cos Romanian National Television want their studio back.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:55 (fifteen years ago)
caek is killing it here
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)
i just got called an unsung hero, i guess?
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)
haha xxp
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)
i am in an unsung army of heroes and heroines, says nick clegg
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)
and he might give me a week off?
winning here!
carer katona morelike amirite
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)
With all these heroes, heroines, hard working families and brave soldiers how come we have broken Britain.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:58 (fifteen years ago)
no "broken britain" mention tonight. starting to think the fightback against that meme may be taking effect.
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:58 (fifteen years ago)
he went to ETON and we're paying for him to go on holiday so he doesn't have to spend time with his SON
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)
^^^ all i got from that
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:00 (fifteen years ago)
Has Brown been coached to sound as softly spoken as possible? He's the only one not declaiming as loudly as possible, it's uncharacteristic.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:00 (fifteen years ago)
"not the old style of politics with the rappers and the zavvi. the new style of politics."
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
oh, clegg with the name recall
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
"i can write down names"
oh good grief
what a clown
clegg's summation has begun weakly
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)
brown also starts terribly with reference to "glee" or something
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)
xpost Yeah, shame as he was ahead of the rest until that.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
and finished pretty weakly xxp
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
SUPPORT FAIRNESSSSZZZZZ
― MPx4A, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
PoliticsUK Politics SpecialsWho will win the first TV debate 2010 Rear of the Year
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
Clegg needs an Innocent Smoothie makeover imo
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
CHOOSE HOPE OVER FEAR
― p-dog, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:04 (fifteen years ago)
Clegg needed to say something there that couldn't have been culled from an Embrace lyric
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:04 (fifteen years ago)
oh gordon
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:04 (fifteen years ago)
I HATE YOU ALL
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:05 (fifteen years ago)
VALUES
cameron crushing closing statements : (
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:05 (fifteen years ago)
NONE OF THEM CAN STOP US NOWWE CAN MAKE IT THROUGH SOMEHOW
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)
god i'll probably watch newsnight too
was supposed to see 'syndromes and a century' oh well
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)
i think i hate them all now
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)
topical malady xp
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)
Am I tripping or did Cameron just say "importantest"?
― Count Palmiro Vicarion (Stew), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)
imo cameron did not come off well in that
deal remains unclosed
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:08 (fifteen years ago)
Hate this whole charade.
― dead flower :( (Pashmina), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:08 (fifteen years ago)
imagine that with foot vs thatcher vs idk whoever, shirley williams?
would have been more exciting
HATE. Actually wish physical harm on some of these ppl.
GB and Cameron did ok, GB prob a bit better than expected, Clegg for the win only just.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)
No doube mail, express, telegraph sun & times will call this as decisive win for that loathsome piece of shit cameron.
― dead flower :( (Pashmina), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)
― dead flower :( (Pashmina), Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:08 (2 seconds ago) Bookmark
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)
ITV polls had Clegg winning overall & closing statements, Brown winning economy, Cameron last in everything.
― i would just like to point out that i have been antimony on this thread (onimo), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, cameron big disappointment given expectations, except for the closing statement. brown so weird and creepy but also competent, so may have exceeded expectations. clegg solid, will get the expected boost from these.
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:10 (fifteen years ago)
zenlike moans i have seen on tshirts
TRUSTYOUR INSTINCT
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:10 (fifteen years ago)
i've figured out clegg's canniness: usually people say about the LDs, "well, yeah, you can SAY that coz you're never going to win." so his line of attack was "yeah, you SAY that but nothing ever happens."
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)
line of the night still the thing about the 40 year old black man cameron knows
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:12 (fifteen years ago)
i still love colleges of crime
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, Thursday, April 15, 2010 10:12 PM (14 seconds ago) Bookmark
i saw this (unutterably terrible) doc about him where they had the guy from hi-lows in cowley road saying cameron was good people and you could leave your kid with him... cameron should have mentioned that.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:14 (fifteen years ago)
bbc news showing the bits that played best with their focus group
― p-dog, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:14 (fifteen years ago)
xp, oh my god!
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:14 (fifteen years ago)
that guy is straight up mentally ill, would love to see him out on the campaign trail repping for dave
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:15 (fifteen years ago)
this fucking country
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:16 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, Thursday, April 15, 2010 10:15 PM (20 seconds ago) Bookmark
i laughed me a laugh when i saw it coz the public school dude in my house (10-15 years post-cameron) became thick with him. potentially among the most known-by-pubic-school-guys black man ever.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)
lol @ pubic school
― ailsa, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)
'became thick with him'
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)
haha, I saw the Oxford Mail article and was wracked by conflicting emotions
― falling while carrying an owl (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:19 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1218964/David-Cameron-cool-says-Rasta-cafe-owner-befriended-Tory-leader-Oxford.html
ahhhh
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:20 (fifteen years ago)
did Cameron actually say he'd met a 40 year old black man who'd been in the navy for 30 years?
― MPx4A, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:21 (fifteen years ago)
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:22 (fifteen years ago)
oh, maybe not the last... hmm
twitter seems to think so
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:23 (fifteen years ago)
cameron's attempts to appear like he is an ordinary guy with so many anecdotes were pathetic too "i talked to a 40 year old black man..." redlob51 - Twitter - 4 minutes ago@watsoncomedian ...a 40 year old black man who apparently came here when he was 6 and has been in the navy for 30 years -does that add up? adiposerex - Twitter - 8 minutes agoCameron met a 40 year old black man who has been in the royal navy for 30 years. Dear God. amostynwilliams - Twitter - 8 minutes ago
Cameron's friend Giles Andreae, who went on to create the famous Purple Ronnie range of greeting cards, remembers that he and Cameron would eat at the Hi-Lo 'a lot'.
...
― falling while carrying an owl (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:23 (fifteen years ago)
Most unsurprising Sky headline of the evening so far: Viewers think Gordon Brown has performed the worst just 30 minutes into the first prime ministerial televised debate.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:25 (fifteen years ago)
And reports Sun/Yougov poll - Clegg 51% Cameron 29% Brown 19%
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:26 (fifteen years ago)
New tory poster supposedly?http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content/StaticFile/jpg/2010/Apr/Week3/15603324.jpg
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)
did they announce who will reprise alisdair stewart's pscyhotic golf club compere role for bbc and sky
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:33 (fifteen years ago)
"well there are certainly a lot of tweets out there, kirsty"
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:34 (fifteen years ago)
adam bolton and dimbelby iirc
alan johnson declaring nick clegg the winner
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:35 (fifteen years ago)
My money's on Claudia Winkleman and Angela Griffin
xposts
― ailsa, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:35 (fifteen years ago)
oh fuck not fucking kirsty wark
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)
LOL that sneaky Brown smile when he was steamrollering Cam'ron.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:38 (fifteen years ago)
this bulgaria thing -- what's their ave lifespan, etc? statistics are sum bullshit
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:40 (fifteen years ago)
bbc news showing the bits that played best with their focus group― p-dog, Thursday, April 15, 2010 9:14 PM (29 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
what was up with the googlyeyed guy behind rita's left shoulder
wd love a gif of him
― etrian odysseus (cozen), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)
not watching theresa may
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)
Fucking hell, I am meh in public speaking situs and even I can pwn Teresa May.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)
Also Guardian noticed their 'worm' was being hit waaaaay too much by LibDem HQ. Blanket strategy?
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:49 (fifteen years ago)
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:16 (32 minutes ago)
Quite.
― dead flower :( (Pashmina), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:50 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010
Maybe - but "Brilliant Britain" just doesn't have the same ring to it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZDreHPzU94
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)
doesn't he live in los angeles?
― caek, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:57 (fifteen years ago)
I thought it was New York?
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:58 (fifteen years ago)
basically the labour version of john cleese
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:58 (fifteen years ago)
he was in LA when he was making "the riches" but now idk
Is John Cleese still Lib Dem? Now, he has got a lovely house stateside on Santa Barbara beach.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:03 (fifteen years ago)
If I had the chance to ask a question I would at least rehearse it so it didn't sound like the most vacant, blank reading of it done for the very first time
― boxedjoy, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:04 (fifteen years ago)
Okay, I wasn't actually watching earlier and am trying to catch up now - everyone's coverage but sky is fucking torture. Nice focus on Gordon's joke, that's pretty much what I'd be like doing unrehearsed stand-up. Clegg is obviously best at this, but tbh if I didn't know he was a politician I'd just assume he was a full-time tv presenter. Bit of amateurism might be a good thing for gaining a bit of gravitas.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:17 (fifteen years ago)
so... when did having an elected house of lords and electoral reform become labour policy? what are the chances of it happening under another labour govt?
― ogmor, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:22 (fifteen years ago)
Needs an instant opinion poll on Alistair Stewart's tie.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:28 (fifteen years ago)
xp "Let's get rid of heriditary peers" was in the 1997 manifesto.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:29 (fifteen years ago)
for some reason i find pro-labour celebrities more repugnant than their tory counterparts while my feelings on their parties are the other way around.
― 404s & Heartbreak (jim in glasgow), Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:30 (fifteen years ago)
they got rid of most of the heriditary peers
replaced them with upstanding chaps like ashcroft, mandelson, etc
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:33 (fifteen years ago)
Probably around the time they realised there might be a Hung Parliament.
Given that the LibDems are the only party pledging to cut spending on the NHS, I'm not sure why they're doing so well in these debates. Pretty sure Clegg could turn up and say the LibDems would introduce compulsory child molestation and 55% of voters would still say he performed the best.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:33 (fifteen years ago)
Given that the LibDems are the only party pledging to cut spending on the NHS, I'm not sure why they're doing so well in these debates.
the tories have overcompensated on this one, i think. but there is also the practical question: if you ring-fence x, y gets even more slashed.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:35 (fifteen years ago)
Isn't it because they have pledged to cut spending on NHS bureacracy rather than the bits that the GBP actually see and interact with?
― ailsa, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:42 (fifteen years ago)
Pretty sure Clegg could turn up and say the LibDems would introduce compulsory child molestation and 55% of voters would still say he performed the best.
Think the figure would be a bit lower myself.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:45 (fifteen years ago)
Oh God, just when I thought tonight couldn't get any worse, Andrew Neil is being Dorothy from the Wizard of Oz.
― ailsa, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:48 (fifteen years ago)
any BETTER you mean
― conrad, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:49 (fifteen years ago)
xxp Should have known someone else would note this.
Andrew Neil on BBC1 right now is on some next level fucking retarded bullshit. Fucking Wizard of Oz song and Ulrika-ka-ka-ka.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:50 (fifteen years ago)
http://imgur.com/kLatT.jpg
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:53 (fifteen years ago)
so glad I just switched the telly off
― i would just like to point out that i have been antimony on this thread (onimo), Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:54 (fifteen years ago)
Would totally watch telly and talk shit with Clive Anderson. No-one in the fucking WORLD cares what Ulrika thinks, do they?
― ailsa, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:55 (fifteen years ago)
they do
― conrad, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)
if yr going to make the lords elected then it wld need to be beefed up from the slobear compromised mess it's been turned into out of indecisive embarrassment, otherwise there'd be no point in voting for your very own LORD.
― ogmor, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)
funny simon schama cares about ulrika!
― conrad, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:58 (fifteen years ago)
Oh look, Ulrika <3 Dave
― ailsa, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:59 (fifteen years ago)
What's Simon Schama's deal? I thought he was a sober historian, instead he's coming across as a bit of a tart.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:59 (fifteen years ago)
he's really come out of his shell recently
― conrad, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:59 (fifteen years ago)
brown attempted to forge agreement w/ clegg a couple of times tonight & I can't remember him giving him any grief
― ogmor, Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:00 (fifteen years ago)
tired of this endless shit about cutting bureaucracy - no-one ever puts anything to it other than a zingy suggestion that it's all Whitehall geezers in bowler hats screwing more expenses than an MP on a fact finding mission.
"we'll cut all the bureaucrats and spend it on all on nurses!""why aren't the nurses getting paid?""oh we got rid of the bureaucratic pay section.""why are the scalpels all covered in shit?""oh we got rid of the people who manage the contract for shit removal.""where all the bandages?""bandage supply guy was a bureaucrat, fuck him.""people are dying!""we've got more unpaid nurses to close their eyes and tell the families!"
― i would just like to point out that i have been antimony on this thread (onimo), Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:01 (fifteen years ago)
Well, yeah, but I was talking from the point of view of the people who might now vote for Nick Clegg because he talks nice on the telly, and probably think NHS bureacracy is men in bowler hats being nasty to the brave angel nurses.
(was sort of trying to answer Matt's question about why they are doing well despite threatening NHS cuts, and that's the best I could come up with)
― ailsa, Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:06 (fifteen years ago)
so glad i gave up on This Week. used to be watchable on a basic level before some idiot decided they needed props, gutter slebs and "humour" beyond O'Neal's half-arsed everyday wryness (this is goin back at least 3 years now).
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:09 (fifteen years ago)
Thought broadcasters had to be impartial towards the parties during the election period, or is that just radio?
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:09 (fifteen years ago)
All this talk about a hung parliament being likely, it's not what the bookies are saying at all.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:10 (fifteen years ago)
ehhh guys, really, there is a lot of unproductive bureaucracy in the nhs. as there is in any very large-scale organization.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:11 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, I know. There's a bit less since I lost my job though :-)
― ailsa, Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:11 (fifteen years ago)
that sucks
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:12 (fifteen years ago)
ailsa - daily politics starring andrew neil is on every weekday at the mo
― conrad, Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:12 (fifteen years ago)
It's what the public wants.
― ailsa, Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:13 (fifteen years ago)
ha why did i write 'O'Neal'
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:15 (fifteen years ago)
alexander
― conrad, Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:18 (fifteen years ago)
http://imgur.com/Uq6bT.png
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:22 (fifteen years ago)
Can't believe only 3 per cent of Sun readers tuned into the repeat of 2 Pints Of Lager on BBC3.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:23 (fifteen years ago)
A coincidence that that pie is on its side with the blue section turned towards us? we are seeing a lot of blue for 29.65% (first in the list too for no apparent reason). maybe i'm just being paranoid...
― p-dog, Friday, 16 April 2010 01:02 (fifteen years ago)
how did they determine the positions and speaking order last night? coin toss?
― etrian odysseus (cozen), Friday, 16 April 2010 06:05 (fifteen years ago)
Brown has to be positioned where he is because of his visual impairment.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Friday, 16 April 2010 06:56 (fifteen years ago)
lolol, I made this exact same quip.
Dave banging on about "cancer drugs" and the Lexus reminded me of my dad's mental way of arguing politics.
― Not the real Village People, Friday, 16 April 2010 07:06 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.danburymint.co.uk/products/S_CLEGF.JPG Clegg also wins the Sky News text poll, but Brown comes in second, Cameron last.
http://www.skyuser.co.uk/forum/sky-news-announcements/36842-nick-clegg-voted-winner-first-leaders-debate-sky-news-text-poll.html
― New Hors d'œuvre (DavidM), Friday, 16 April 2010 09:04 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fxGHa5nfOvE
david hare is liveblogging the election for the guardian...
im sure if i were cleverer i could think of a writer who'd gone from journalism into drama and eventually into writing real plays; ya boy dave has kind of taken the opposite trajectory so far as i can tell. did pretty decent ish like 'plenty', ends up putting on edited transcripts of senate hearings, etc., and now into the world of actual reportage.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Friday, 16 April 2010 09:10 (fifteen years ago)
after watching that debate and then reading the ICP thread + watching the Miracles video (again) just before bed last night, I woke up at 1am from a dream that this election's party political broadcasts would all be presented by ICP and the winner would be determined by which party's ICP-presented miracles appealed most to the Great British Public
I spent the next half hour throwing up
(this is all true)(ok so maybe I drank too much and shouldn't have eaten the leftovers of the previous night's takeaway)
― falling while carrying an owl (a passing spacecadet), Friday, 16 April 2010 10:03 (fifteen years ago)
iirc nostradamus followed that approximate template
― Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Friday, 16 April 2010 10:14 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/blog/2010/apr/16/general-election-2010-live-blog
"Time to calm down – and reflect on the disadvantages of 24-hour news."
he means reflect on the disadvantages of being a statistically illiterate blogger who stops reading after the hashtags of course
― caek, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:21 (fifteen years ago)
p.s.
11.03am: Cameron has just announced a new initiative. On stage at a school in Nantwich with Gary Barlow, he said that a Tory government would introduce a national music talent competition. It will be called School Stars and it will involve local and regional heats, culminating in a national final in June 2011. The winners would get the chance to record a song with Barlow.
which is the exact opposite of:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/dec/14/cowell-plans-political-x-factor
― koogs, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:32 (fifteen years ago)
caek what's your statistical take on all this stuff?
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Friday, 16 April 2010 12:33 (fifteen years ago)
50%
― caek, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:34 (fifteen years ago)
By the very definition of the word, a competition is often a good way to get people working together.
― James Mitchell, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:34 (fifteen years ago)
goddamn it this "dr johnson as twitterer" on the world at one is the unfunniest thing of all time
not even 140 characters
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Friday, 16 April 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)
twitter is hurting humanity and should stop.
― caek, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:46 (fifteen years ago)
http://twitter.com/DrSamuelJohnson
NOT FUNNIE
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Friday, 16 April 2010 12:48 (fifteen years ago)
Still, the idea of a Conservative Song Comp is.
― Mark G, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:51 (fifteen years ago)
so the author of said twitter feed was on tv?
― nakhchivan, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:51 (fifteen years ago)
if they were just reading out his shit i guess that wd be borderline acceptable
― nakhchivan, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:54 (fifteen years ago)
radio. every day on TWA1 they read out an unfunny tweet where dr johnson defines some aspect of modern politics, in a comedy "18th century" voice with twiddly "18th century" music in the background. never once funny.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Friday, 16 April 2010 12:54 (fifteen years ago)
oh god apparently it's a thing?
http://thequietus.com/articles/03284-doctor-samuel-johnson-s-dictionary-of-the-new-musick-the-letter-b
wonder if this is the same guy
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Friday, 16 April 2010 12:55 (fifteen years ago)
worse than the afternoon play?
― caek, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:55 (fifteen years ago)
that's not acceptable
― nakhchivan, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:56 (fifteen years ago)
well, that i'm able to turn off, but i generally f/w TWA1
they're talking about gary barlow now
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Friday, 16 April 2010 12:57 (fifteen years ago)
am now desirous of compos'ng ane post in ye comedie style
― Ismael Klata, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:58 (fifteen years ago)
thats_racist.gf
― nakhchivan, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:59 (fifteen years ago)
^^^girl problems
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Friday, 16 April 2010 13:02 (fifteen years ago)
no...
Antient Troubadours from the Texan Colonie who do delight the fashionable Americkan by assaulting the Drum & Lute whilst imbibing ETHER
― nakhchivan, Friday, 16 April 2010 13:03 (fifteen years ago)
* Cyclosarin nerve gas (NATO designation: GF) * Fluid intelligence as opposed to gC, crystallized intelligence * Galois field * GeForce * Generating function * Genuine Fractals * GF method, Wilson's normal mode analysis * Gluten Free * Gram force (symbol: gf) * Grammatical Framework, a type-theoretic grammar formalism * Greater fool * Growth factor in biology
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Friday, 16 April 2010 13:05 (fifteen years ago)
im not understanding these recent posts
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Friday, 16 April 2010 13:07 (fifteen years ago)
no
― nakhchivan, Friday, 16 April 2010 13:10 (fifteen years ago)
What curiously scattershot spelling this Dr Johnson has. If only he had compiled some sort of dictionary they could have checked before writing.
― falling while carrying an owl (a passing spacecadet), Friday, 16 April 2010 13:20 (fifteen years ago)
this is prob some phd trying to 'monetarize' their psychotic inability to think without employing ye olde vernacular
― nakhchivan, Friday, 16 April 2010 13:22 (fifteen years ago)
'ye olde toast'
'thee put thine own wellyboot on now!'
― Mark G, Friday, 16 April 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)
MrsNickClegg on Twitter also not funny really - milking it too much, just a tweet a day would do.
― mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 16 April 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)
God, that Dr Johnson dude is terrible.
Isn't it a bit late in the day for Cameron to be dicking around with Gary Barlow? Isn't the point now to show that he isn't a lightweight?
― Matt DC, Friday, 16 April 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)
which of them?
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Friday, 16 April 2010 14:54 (fifteen years ago)
It's been a while since anyone called Gary Barlow a lightweight lol amirite?
― Matt DC, Friday, 16 April 2010 14:59 (fifteen years ago)
well played, sirs
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Friday, 16 April 2010 14:59 (fifteen years ago)
He looked weird last night, but surely not this weird.
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/4/16/1271430636616/David-Cameron-001.jpg
Meanwhile in the real world I had really assumed that Barlow things was a joke. How wrong I was.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7597261/General-Election-2010-Gary-Barlow-unveiled-as-David-Cameron-backer.html
"Thank you Gary for that fantastic performance" - fucking cloth-ears.
― Ned Trifle II, Friday, 16 April 2010 17:31 (fifteen years ago)
http://imgur.com/DeIrz.jpg
― James Mitchell, Saturday, 17 April 2010 14:11 (fifteen years ago)
i have a friend who's always been repping for jonathan raban, but going on his election coverage im not getting it:
http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2010/apr/16/third-party-surprise/
at the end he says proportional representation is a good idea because... it works out pretty well in germany!!!!!!!!!!
um dude. duuuude. really?
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Saturday, 17 April 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)
His thing about Phil Blond in this week's LRB is even worse! That he continues to be asked to write about the UK is an enduring source of wonder/dismay.
― Stevie T, Saturday, 17 April 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)
read that as phil brown. now read everything as phil brown :/
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 17 April 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)
I thought the Phillip Blond thing was pretty good! Or maybe I'm just happy to read any savaging of Blond. What did you think was bad about it?
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Saturday, 17 April 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)
― Stevie T, Saturday, April 17, 2010 4:34 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark
that was a very strange piece. he's right to call blond out, but there was nothing constructive in it at all. there's a bit where he's reciting lots of things blond says about the ills of the modern world as if they were self-evidently nonsense -- sure, some of them are a bit ehh -- that ends up sounding like he thinks everything's fine. example: blond wants fewer and smaller banks; blond is a crank, therefore we plough on with massive, corrupt banks underwritten by the state.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Saturday, 17 April 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)
Wondering if Blond's time at Hull Uni overlapped with mine, but I can't say I remember the guy.
― Bone Thugs-n-Carmody (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 17 April 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)
Can anyone explain how swing-to-seat calculations work? They seem utterly daft. For instance, on the telegraph one, I put in a 20% lab-to-lib swing, and Labour ended up the largest party, even with 15% of the vote, while the Lib Dems got 52% of the national vote and 120 seats. Is the calculation as broken for small numbers?
― Gravel Puzzleworth, Saturday, 17 April 2010 17:37 (fifteen years ago)
uniform swings never happen.
but when they do, my understanding is, the fact that labour (and to a lesser extent con) have massive leads in their heartland means you need big swings to take them. the swing, as long as it isn't like 70%, really only affects the swing seats, of which there are not that many.
― caek, Saturday, 17 April 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)
also useful: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/interactive/2010/apr/05/general-election-map-swingometer
― caek, Saturday, 17 April 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)
import black man news: http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/news/Cameron-got-wrong/article-2032336-detail/article.html
― caek, Saturday, 17 April 2010 18:11 (fifteen years ago)
"Britain is a great country. What I want the politicians to tell me is what they are going to do to safeguard the British people from the immigrants who come here and commit serious crimes."
The same thing as non-immigrants who commit serious crimes?
― Ned Trifle II, Saturday, 17 April 2010 18:56 (fifteen years ago)
Love that mock-Cameron poster James Mitchell posted about ten posts up.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Saturday, 17 April 2010 19:10 (fifteen years ago)
Agreed, apart from the one where he morphs into Thatcher this is one of the best ones I've seen.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Saturday, 17 April 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.fridgemagnet.org.uk/toys/dave-met.php
― tomofthenest, Saturday, 17 April 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)
^ Brilliant
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Saturday, 17 April 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
Up on my Facebook page already.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Saturday, 17 April 2010 20:54 (fifteen years ago)
loooooooooooooooool
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Saturday, 17 April 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)
"Last week, I met a Polish advertising executive, who told me that Polly Toynbee killed Diana."
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Saturday, 17 April 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
"Last week, I met an imaginary investment banker, who told me that dubstep always goes to the front of the housing queue."
― tomofthenest, Saturday, 17 April 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)
"Last week, I met an Afghan lady, who told me that Lady Gaga just gets worse and worse."
― tomofthenest, Saturday, 17 April 2010 21:05 (fifteen years ago)
Afghan lady OTM.
"Last week, I met a Somali doctor, who told me that climate change hysteria got a free car from the NHS."
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Saturday, 17 April 2010 21:14 (fifteen years ago)
"Last week, I met a disabled youth worker, who told me that Political Correctness needed to get a proper job."
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Saturday, 17 April 2010 21:30 (fifteen years ago)
It really does seem more & more like Labour's best hope of having Gordon Brown be the next PM is having the Lib Dems steal lots of their own 2005 voters?
Politics is so weird.
― Gravel Puzzleworth, Sunday, 18 April 2010 11:59 (fifteen years ago)
http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash1/hs472.ash1/25882_117204458297170_117203521630597_284371_6035040_n.jpg
― if, Sunday, 18 April 2010 12:01 (fifteen years ago)
I'd say a LibDem surge is a lot worse for the Tories than it is for Labour - the Tories would have been banking on winning a lot of rural seats from an anonymous LibDem party and that now looks like it's out of the window. Meanwhile marginal LibDem seats are more vulnerable to the Tories so Cameron could see himself being attacked from both sides.
I'd say most Labour seats that were likely to be lost to the LibDems were actually lost in 2005, anti-war protest votes and what have you.
― Matt DC, Sunday, 18 April 2010 12:28 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7100966.eceThe Tories, who have been the biggest victims of the Clegg surge, last night sent out one of their big hitters to attack the Lib Dems’ policies and leadership. In an interview with The Sunday Times, William Hague, the shadow foreign secretary, claimed that a vote for Clegg was a vote for the “European super-state”.
a line of attack that has them drawing attention to the michael howard-type stuff does not seem smart to me.
― caek, Sunday, 18 April 2010 13:24 (fifteen years ago)
I've never really understood whether Hague is a liability or not for the tories. They seem to like him but I'm not sure if anyone else does. This is turning into an interesting election suddenly. When's the next debate?
― Ned Trifle II, Sunday, 18 April 2010 13:29 (fifteen years ago)
"Nick Clegg nearly as popular as Winston Churchill"
― Brian Keno (King Boy Pato), Sunday, 18 April 2010 13:30 (fifteen years ago)
next thursday
― caek, Sunday, 18 April 2010 13:30 (fifteen years ago)
last one the thursday after
― caek, Sunday, 18 April 2010 13:31 (fifteen years ago)
For some reason, I am amused and fascinated by that headline. (xp)
― Brian Keno (King Boy Pato), Sunday, 18 April 2010 13:32 (fifteen years ago)
apparently the next one will have more foreign policy stuff, which should be a clegg weak spot, at least in the debate, if not with voters, but after cameron's china zing, which demonstrates total cretinousness in this area, i am stoked for the madness.
― caek, Sunday, 18 April 2010 13:32 (fifteen years ago)
He'll win if he says he knows a chinaman.
― Brian Keno (King Boy Pato), Sunday, 18 April 2010 13:35 (fifteen years ago)
Winston Churchill was personally very popular in 1945 I seem to remember.
― Ned Trifle II, Sunday, 18 April 2010 13:37 (fifteen years ago)
A whole debate on foreign policy seems disproportionate at the moment - don't get the feeling it's a major factor in this election at all.
― Ismael Klata, Sunday, 18 April 2010 13:42 (fifteen years ago)
that's the "theme" for the first half
apparently the theme last time was domestic, and the last one is economy
― caek, Sunday, 18 April 2010 13:43 (fifteen years ago)
Oh I think they should go for it because Cameron will look like a pure prannet.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Sunday, 18 April 2010 13:44 (fifteen years ago)
Sub-themes: International relations; Afghanistan; Iraq; Iran; Middle East; UK defence; International terrorism; Europe; Climate change; China; International Development
― caek, Sunday, 18 April 2010 13:45 (fifteen years ago)
cameron on iran and china is going to be awesome
Last one on the economy is very good for Brown. If it carries on like this I'd be tempted to call the election for Labour just because I can't see the Tories making sufficient inroads. Long way to go though obviously.
Other thing to bear in mind is that the emergence of Clegg has neutralised the Dave tactic, so the Tories will have to be more aggressive and may well blow it by lurching right. I expect Brown to do a lot of palling up attempts in the next couple of weeks, laughing loudly at all his jokes, being totally gay etc.
― Matt DC, Sunday, 18 April 2010 13:50 (fifteen years ago)
HJs all round after the watershed, yeah.
big concern for labour (in addition to them just not getting enough MPs, which is still likely) is the maths getting complicated and them losing the popular vote by a lot rather than a little, which creates legitimacy problems.
― caek, Sunday, 18 April 2010 13:54 (fifteen years ago)
― Brian Keno (King Boy Pato), Sunday, April 18, 2010 2:30 PM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark
i lol'd at this, and im guessing the sunday times's editor was too
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Sunday, 18 April 2010 13:56 (fifteen years ago)
my main feeling about the tories is that their main "argument" is something that policy wonks and mary-ann sieghart like and understand but leave the rest of us baffled.
their manifesto's front page was an "invitation to join the government", and while that sounds tempting to veteran trotskyists and gramscian council communists like me, they haven't been able to explain what the f it all means in practice (like marx amirite). i think it's probably steve hilton's fault.
― Big Fate (as Alvin 'Xzibit' Joiner) (history mayne), Sunday, 18 April 2010 14:01 (fifteen years ago)
lololol
― caek, Sunday, 18 April 2010 14:03 (fifteen years ago)
what happened to that BA strike? is that off? postponed by volcano? still on and scheduled for may 2-7?
― caek, Sunday, 18 April 2010 14:23 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, Sunday, 18 April 2010 14:45 (36 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
I once met a Chinaman...
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Sunday, 18 April 2010 14:23 (fifteen years ago)
'Chinaman is not the preferred nomenclature.'
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Sunday, 18 April 2010 14:24 (fifteen years ago)
Be even funnier if it was I once met a Chink...
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Sunday, 18 April 2010 14:31 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah - if the LDs actually *won* the popular vote (which is, what, a 5% chance at this point? What are the bookies giving?) it'd be a total astonishing constitutional mess - I can see the GBP buying "Cameron won by a bit, but the other two teamed up to keep him out", but "Brown came third, so Labour formed a majority government" is like the nightmare scenario for FPTP.
― Gravel Puzzleworth, Sunday, 18 April 2010 22:32 (fifteen years ago)
I had a look at the odds earlier and tbh they're just as confusing as the polls at the moment. Tories have gone out slightly but still 1/5 to 'win' the election, but hung parliament now odds-on while Tory overall majority is about 13/8 (was the other way round last time I'd checked). What stood out for me was the totally new bet of 25/1 Lib Dem overall majority - or half as likely as Labour overall majority at 12/1.
― Ismael Klata, Sunday, 18 April 2010 22:38 (fifteen years ago)
odds != likelines
― i would just like to point out that i have been antimony on this thread (onimo), Monday, 19 April 2010 00:22 (fifteen years ago)
s
Boris' verdict:
As for Clegg, I remember thinking that it was indeed a historic debate – the moment when the idea of a third force in British politics finally shrivelled under the Manchester TV lights. He was by far the worst, with many of his answers seeming to be semi-masticated versions of something Cameron had already said. And so you can imagine my amazement when those polls started to come in, and the news that the punters overwhelmingly scored it for Cleggie. It was one of those times when there seems to be only one solution to the problems of British politics, and that is to dissolve the electorate and summon a new one.
― James Mitchell, Monday, 19 April 2010 08:41 (fifteen years ago)
"I can't believe people are dumb enough to vote for this shit" sentiments pretty rich coming from that guy, huh?
― MPx4A, Monday, 19 April 2010 08:44 (fifteen years ago)
This is really obvious 'write a narrative and hope that people jump aboard, regardless of the truth of the matter' sub-Murdoch bullshit.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Monday, 19 April 2010 08:59 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pp_HTYVIfTU
― James Mitchell, Monday, 19 April 2010 09:11 (fifteen years ago)
Boris whimsically wagers a grand on a Tory election victory and then wonders why he's so out of touch with the electorate? R u fukkin kiddin' me?
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Monday, 19 April 2010 09:29 (fifteen years ago)
this seems like a much better line from the tories than either the "eccentric" angle or the "not enough like michael howard" angle, both of which would be enjoyably disastrous for them:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/apr/19/david-cameron-nick-clegg-conservatives
― caek, Monday, 19 April 2010 09:39 (fifteen years ago)
i mean it's kind of vague -- we're more hopey changey than them -- but it's a basic requirement to beat the incumbent, so they're right to hit it, even if it's bullshit
― caek, Monday, 19 April 2010 09:41 (fifteen years ago)
and another thing: a seriously distorted popular vote vs. MPs count that favours labour will be tricky for the conservatives to handle, given they are the only party that still support the system that got us into that mess.
― caek, Monday, 19 April 2010 10:06 (fifteen years ago)
I dunno how convincingly Labour can claim to be pro all these electoral reforms they muttered vaguely about and then spent 13 years not implementing, but yeah
plus the Tories have quite the list of things they handle by saying it's a) wrong b) possibly Labour's fault even though they've always been for it and will not do anything about it, don't really know if it'll prove any more awkward than all the other things they manage to keep brushing off
but, shit is getting kinda ridiculous, certainly. EXCITING! though possibly in the same way as watching yr own impending car crash in slow motion is exciting.
― falling while carrying an owl (a passing spacecadet), Monday, 19 April 2010 10:49 (fifteen years ago)
ha hai was real excited about the debates and as of twenty minutes afterwards have just accepted that our system just got a whole lot dumber. but i guess it's amusing to watch it all play out.
― Earning your Masters in Library and Information Science is beautiful (schlump), Monday, 19 April 2010 10:56 (fifteen years ago)
Watching that debate, I had the clear impression that Cameron aced every question. His answers were clear, concise and knowledgeable, and in my focus group of 12- to 16-year-olds he was the overwhelming winner. "David Cameron knows more than the others," said the 12-year-old, "and everything he says is true!"
I'm afraid our system did not *just* get a whole lot dumber.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Monday, 19 April 2010 11:06 (fifteen years ago)
Try asking some voters, Boris. DUH.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Monday, 19 April 2010 11:11 (fifteen years ago)
And not the 'chaps' in yr local 'public' school...
― Mark G, Monday, 19 April 2010 11:14 (fifteen years ago)
Boris whimsically wagers a grand on a Tory election victory and then wonders why he's so out of touch with the electorate? R u fukkin kiddin' me?― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Monday, 19 April 2010 04:29 (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Monday, 19 April 2010 04:29 (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Being in touch with the common man means wagering a grand rather than 1000 guineas.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 19 April 2010 11:19 (fifteen years ago)
isn't this kind of like a footballer betting on a match, by the way?
― caek, Monday, 19 April 2010 11:26 (fifteen years ago)
Only if Boris engineers a tumble.
― Mark G, Monday, 19 April 2010 11:27 (fifteen years ago)
boris can't really influence the result directly. not in a good way anyway xp
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Monday, 19 April 2010 11:28 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, but a footballer can't influence the result of a game he's not playing in.
― caek, Monday, 19 April 2010 11:30 (fifteen years ago)
Boris probably asked his kids.
― mmmm, Monday, 19 April 2010 11:30 (fifteen years ago)
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/cristinaodone/100035241/the-lib-dems-are-a-jekyll-and-hyde-party-forget-nice-mr-clegg-what-about-dr-death/
lol at "really believes"
― caek, Monday, 19 April 2010 11:33 (fifteen years ago)
reply from evan harris in the comments
― caek, Monday, 19 April 2010 11:37 (fifteen years ago)
Got a feeling the Clegg factor is only really a reflection of how unpopular Brown and Cameron really are, and everyone's getting very excited about the possibility of an alternative only to give up on it once Clegg inevitaby wilts under the massive scrutiny he's going to get in the coming weeks.
― Matt DC, Monday, 19 April 2010 11:44 (fifteen years ago)
And the biggest 'anti' set of comments since Stephen Gately... (xpost)
― Mark G, Monday, 19 April 2010 11:47 (fifteen years ago)
Well done of “evanharris” for reminding us how repugnant the Liberals really are.
You may have secular values and atheist beliefs in private.
But that doesn’t give you the right to impose secularism on the rest of us.
Keep secularism out of politics.
This is a doozy.
― MPx4A, Monday, 19 April 2010 11:47 (fifteen years ago)
keep secularism out of politics
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Monday, 19 April 2010 11:48 (fifteen years ago)
From the comments section:
Thanks for the heads up, Cristina! Now I know to cheer for the LibDems. I want to know that if I end up in a vegetative state, I’m given a peaceful death rather than my own Telegraph column.
Christina Odone is an evil witch.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 19 April 2010 11:49 (fifteen years ago)
The whole cadence of that one I quoted is so perfectly paced to be a Major Misunderstanding strip.
― MPx4A, Monday, 19 April 2010 11:52 (fifteen years ago)
xp, lol i missed that one. booming zing.
― caek, Monday, 19 April 2010 11:53 (fifteen years ago)
Need more of this around:
http://s2.b3ta.com/host/creative/47433/1271370585/thumb.lemonparty.jpg
― James Mitchell, Monday, 19 April 2010 13:58 (fifteen years ago)
ok i lol'd :/
amazing christina odone zing, yeah
― maybe rabbits feel the need to play up their 'lynchian' qualities (acoleuthic), Monday, 19 April 2010 14:01 (fifteen years ago)
Has this been on yet? (not rooting through pages)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8630001.stm
― THE QUEST IS THE QUEST (aldo), Monday, 19 April 2010 15:08 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, there's a long and inglorious history of Lab vs Lib (and vice-versa) leaflets not being the most...erm...constructive. Should be fun if there's a hung parliament.
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 19 April 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)
This second Dunkirk thing - it's not like Dunkirk at all, it really isn't.
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 19 April 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)
So Lib-Dems lead the polls but people don't support their policies (if I'm reading this right?) - it's business as usual!http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/04/18/full-results-of-latest-yougov-poll-libdems-top-again/
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 19 April 2010 20:36 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u0QsSoV0SRo
― broad layering (onimo), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 08:50 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7OGUAQSYQ4
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 09:40 (fifteen years ago)
***S***M***H***
― went ham in a bad way (stevie), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 09:48 (fifteen years ago)
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_8BPw8BFVVL4/S8z48PFyvUI/AAAAAAAAAG4/qF-xtSaQlJo/s640/ctrend+10-04-20.png
postal voting opens tomorrow
http://ukelectiontrend.blogspot.com/2010/04/irreversable-effects-of-lib-dem-boost.html
― caek, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 12:43 (fifteen years ago)
A few BIG assumptions being made there - how do we know the LibDem boost has caused more people to register to vote? Also postal or proxy votes are more likely to be cast by people who haven't been as exposed to the media frenzy over the last few days.
This isn't to say there won't be a big LibDem boost - for all the blather about this being the social media election, it feels like the first one where TV has been more important as a platform for ideas and debate than newspapers, which is ridiculous when you think about it. And I can't see any of the main parties electing a leader who wouldn't be able to make themselves look good in one of these TV debates.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 13:05 (fifteen years ago)
how do we know the LibDem boost has caused more people to register to vote?
it sounds plausible that it has, or will increase turnout, particularly among people who might not have bothered, but yeah, no numbers to back this up.
Also postal or proxy votes are more likely to be cast by people who haven't been as exposed to the media frenzy over the last few days.
Not sure this is true. Are you talking about overseas and armed forces vote? That's tiny compared to, e.g., the US. But yeah, the kind of person who is voting today probably made their mind up a long time ago.
But basically, it's not a bad thing for the lib dems that the polls are opening at a time when they are at what we presume is a peak in their support.
― caek, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 13:10 (fifteen years ago)
Clegg's in for a massive savaging from the Sun and the Mail after the next debate. Brown will probably get off lightly in comparison.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 13:14 (fifteen years ago)
They've been pushing people to register pretty hard since the debate, but it seems unlikely that they could make that much headway in two or three days, especially as that requires folk to actually *do* something, rather than just express a whim to pollsters
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 13:18 (fifteen years ago)
Ban pollsters imo.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)
This is Brown's toughest debate
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 13:25 (fifteen years ago)
Wait is this the one about foreign policy? By which I assume involves constantly banging on about the lack of helicopters in Afghanistan to the exclusion of all else.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 13:30 (fifteen years ago)
nominally the first half is about foreign policy, but unless there are gaffs, i don't think it will be of much interest to the papers or voters.
seems to me that labour already lost all the available iraq protest vote seats in 2005. further lib dem gains at labour's expense will not be on foreign policy.
― caek, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 13:30 (fifteen years ago)
there was already an equipment question last week, and i would be surprised if they included another. xp
― caek, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 13:31 (fifteen years ago)
i want to know more about cameron's china and iran policies.
― caek, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 13:32 (fifteen years ago)
By which I assume involves constantly banging on about the lack of helicopters in Afghanistan to the exclusion of all else.
Precisely.
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 13:33 (fifteen years ago)
I presume you are alluding to this? Glad someone else noticed.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=raaim1hPwEw
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 13:49 (fifteen years ago)
He really did look odd that night. Is it a make-up problem?Are they going to move around this time - with Clegg in the middle?
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)
Down to drawing lots, isn't it?
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)
Such a stupid comparison. They have the occasional election in Iran.
― Bone Thugs-n-Carmody (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 13:53 (fifteen years ago)
No, brown is always on our right because of his gammy eye. clegg and cameron swap places, so clegg is in the middle on thursday.
― caek, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 14:04 (fifteen years ago)
gammy eye ftw
― conrad, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)
Gammmy Clegg I reckon after Thursday
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 14:10 (fifteen years ago)
delete britain: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/20/clegg-cameron-posher
― caek, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 16:45 (fifteen years ago)
You do not have to be aware of that ludicrous acronym, MPSIA ("minor public school, I'm afraid") to sense that metropolitan Westminster School, where Clegg went, is just not as grand as Cameron's alma mater, Eton – which, as Dominic Lawson pointed out on Sunday, has truly become a four letter word.
Trying to work Ferg's ILX handle into some sort of joke here, also trying to make some half-assed claim that I plan to use this acronym myself at any given opportunity while making it plain I find the whole thing ludicrous, only really able to gawp and smdh
― Mr. Squee (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)
Kicking Louis Theroux around will never be a vote-loser. Maybe if Brown did it.
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 16:56 (fifteen years ago)
fuck it, let's get ironic
― MPSIA (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)
westminster isn't mps tho rly is it
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 17:01 (fifteen years ago)
I'm Afraid
― MPSIA (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)
(no, of course it isn't - am now about to find out where Shonko Bosley or whatever his name is went)
King's School Canterbury, apparently.
― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 17:11 (fifteen years ago)
in like Flynn
― MPSIA (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 17:11 (fifteen years ago)
anyway yeah that's a pretty MPS if I may say so myself. Shonko I scorn thee. pleb.
― MPSIA (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)
oldest school in the country innit? let both my brothers in which pretty much discounts it tho
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)
hahaha you shouldn't reveal personal stuff on the internet, you never know who might track you down
the moral of the story is that Guardian writers like to wring their hands and externalise the suspicion that they are hypocrites
― MPSIA (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)
don't know who wd track me down from that info but there u go
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 17:16 (fifteen years ago)
was v much a ref to your secretive ways, which have occasioned all sorts of speculation w/in my questing consciousness, probably all errant
― MPSIA (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)
To modern day readers, the figure of the knight-errant suggests a sort of lawful or righteous vigilante. A knight-errant typically performed all his deeds in the name of a lady, and invoked her name before performing an exploit. In more sublimated forms of knight-errantry, pure metaphysical idealism rather than romantic inspiration motivated the knight-errant (as in the case of Sir Galahad).
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 17:29 (fifteen years ago)
one day I'm just gonna drop all my shit and go knight-errant
― MPSIA (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 17:33 (fifteen years ago)
trying 2 think of 'topical' political knights-errant
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)
sir liam donaldson, rip dude
― MPSIA (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)
Curious piece by david yelland in the guardian, I don't really know what to make of it.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/18/clegg-media-elite-murdoch-lib-dem
― dead flower :( (Pashmina), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)
http://d2weypz2veqqsi.cloudfront.net/310/23809.jpg
General Erection Vibrating Love RingCustomer reviews: Not yet reviewed. Add your review IN STOCK Our price: £0.10 Free deliveryRRP: £1.99 You save: £1.89 (95%)LoveHoney Loyalty Programme: Worth 0 Oh! Points.Buy the General Erection Love Ring and cast your vote for which of the party leaders you'd most like (or least dislike!) to have sex with. Vote carefully, this one-night stand will last for 5 years. Let's see a huge turn-out and a well-hung parliament!
Customer reviews: Not yet reviewed. Add your review
IN STOCK
Our price: £0.10 Free delivery
RRP: £1.99 You save: £1.89 (95%)
LoveHoney Loyalty Programme: Worth 0 Oh! Points.
Buy the General Erection Love Ring and cast your vote for which of the party leaders you'd most like (or least dislike!) to have sex with. Vote carefully, this one-night stand will last for 5 years. Let's see a huge turn-out and a well-hung parliament!
That's my Christmas presents sorted.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 17:58 (fifteen years ago)
Clegg's speech, on the other hand, may be identifiably within the borders of received pronunciation, but there is a hint of those flattened northern vowels common now in many brought up south of Watford (to be fair, his constituency is in Sheffield).
What on earth is this supposed to mean?
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:14 (fifteen years ago)
LIB DEMS LOSE THE PLOT
Last night the driver, who picked up the Lib Dem man from Parliament and drove him to North West London, said: "It's extraordinary that someone like him could just leave this stuff in a taxi.
"It's very sloppy to say the least and I thought people should know. That's why I've handed it to The Sun.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 07:22 (fifteen years ago)
"The guy was on the phone during the journey and I think he was talking to Nick Clegg. He kept telling him how well he had done in the debate. He was quite theatrical in the way he spoke."
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 07:23 (fifteen years ago)
The Sun also has an article attacking Clegg for going to public school and being a politician and having sex with foreigners.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 07:39 (fifteen years ago)
http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/5605/imnothererightnow.jpg
It's not holding back, but this graphic is downright weird.
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 07:40 (fifteen years ago)
Bob Dylan wrote the LibDem's TV strategy?
― Mark G, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 07:42 (fifteen years ago)
Beyond parody Mail page: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/index.html
― Stevie T, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 07:47 (fifteen years ago)
Oh no, it's DA YOUF:
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/21/article-1267658-0937D6F3000005DC-425_468x328.jpg
― yes we kenya (suzy), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 07:53 (fifteen years ago)
SamCam's got a new election role... as a latter-day Princess Diana
apparently.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 08:08 (fifteen years ago)
http://img651.imageshack.us/img651/4046/germanplanesw.jpg
I think this is my favourite bit, this or the SWAGS, but there's so much to choose from.
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 08:10 (fifteen years ago)
A Tory shadow minister for communities and local government has said that young Muslim men in Afghanistan perform rape and shootings as part of 'initiation rites'.Stewart Jackson, Conservative shadow communities and local government minister and the party’s regeneration spokesman, was reported by audience members and rival parliamentary candidates to have told a public meeting organised by Peterborough Senior Citizens Forum last month that, in Afghanistan, "fifteen year old Muslim boys’ initiation rites are to rape a woman and shoot a foreigner".
Stewart Jackson, Conservative shadow communities and local government minister and the party’s regeneration spokesman, was reported by audience members and rival parliamentary candidates to have told a public meeting organised by Peterborough Senior Citizens Forum last month that, in Afghanistan, "fifteen year old Muslim boys’ initiation rites are to rape a woman and shoot a foreigner".
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 08:59 (fifteen years ago)
that was a fun bit of the qur'an iirc
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 09:00 (fifteen years ago)
oh wait i don't rc
http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/04/lib-dems-tories-seats-figures
A lead of this size suggests, as Smithson writes, that the Lib Dems will keep almost all of the seats they won in 2005. This finding correlates with one from last week's Crosby/Textor poll for the Telegraph (carried out before Cleggmania) which found that that the Conservatives would fail to win any of the 20 key Lib Dem-Tory marginals.
It's all bad news for David Cameron. Of the 117 seats his party needs to gain for a majority of one, 23 are currently held by the Lib Dems.
If this is to be believed, either the Tories are fucked or there will need to be an almighty collapse of the Labour vote in other seats.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 09:19 (fifteen years ago)
Probably more for the Daily Mail thread, but I did like the guy outraged at his house being on Google Streetview, accompanied by a picture of the guy outside his house, and also a screenshot of his house on Google Streetview.
― ailsa, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 09:37 (fifteen years ago)
Still no idea what's going to happen, other than that the libdems can only decline from here. Right now it feels a little bit like Rage Against the Machine going for xmas no.1, but mostly like that time Norwich led the league at Easter.
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 09:39 (fifteen years ago)
his Aladdin's cave containing items such as a washing machine and a mountain bike
What treasures!
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 09:45 (fifteen years ago)
^^^ small point but would be more potent if norwich weren't about to win the league
― Earning your Masters in Library and Information Science is beautiful (schlump), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 10:27 (fifteen years ago)
just out of interest, coz I know that whatever happens, this scenario won't:
at present the number of MPs held by the 3 main parties is 616. If each of the 3 main parties got 205 seats (to make 615) and UKIP got 1, then who would be PM?
― Grandpont Genie, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 10:32 (fifteen years ago)
probably the leader of interim coalition government, followed by another general election in october
― caek, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 10:34 (fifteen years ago)
nigel farage
― conrad, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 10:36 (fifteen years ago)
probably the leader of interim coalition government
yes but who would that be? without a written constitution, I'd imagine there's no rule saying who it would be? Very different from Poland (oldest written constitution outside of the US) where it is constitutionally decided that the Speaker becomes interim leader following the removal of the president, hence Komorowski taking over from the late Kaczynski.
you know if I ever met this guy, I would ask him why he doesn't pronounce his name "Farridge". "Fa-rarg" sounds SUSPICIOUSLY FRENCH to me!
― Grandpont Genie, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 10:46 (fifteen years ago)
What are the main UKIP constituencies anyhow?
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 10:49 (fifteen years ago)
there aren't any now they have 0 seats. Farage is standing against the Speaker (Bercow) in Buckingham which traditionally the main parties don't do.
― Grandpont Genie, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 10:58 (fifteen years ago)
obviously this has a 0% chance of happening.
but it's up to the largest party/coalition who their leader is however they see fit. it's not a question you need a constitution to answer. the leader and the coalition have to be seen to have sufficient legitimacy that the queen (who can never do anything controversial) is able to invite them to form a government without credible objections from anyone outside the coalition.
perhaps a lib-lab (or perhaps even a three-way) coalition would be formed, with someone relatively unobjectionable as prime minister in a holding pattern over the summer. parliament isn't sitting then anyway, so there's no legislation to pass. lib + lab would then probably run on a coalition ticket, guaranteeing a majority.
presumably the idea with written rules for this eventuality is that you form a stable government more quickly, which minimizes the economic impact. but if you have to use obscure bits of a written constitution to get a head of government, they would have no legitimacy or strength until another election was held, and you would still suffer economic problems.
― caek, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:00 (fifteen years ago)
Hah, it's just occurred to me that the Speaker thing means that Sally Bercow will spend the next few weeks enthusiastically shilling for Labour and will then enthusiastically vote Tory at the end of it.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:07 (fifteen years ago)
It's not just a question of being seen to have legitimacy either xp, whoever it was would have to have the support of a majority or near-majority of MPs or they wouldn't be able to get anything done. If that didn't happen, pretty quickly the government would run out authority to collect tax or spend money, let alone any headline-grabbing stuff, and a coalition would have to form or you'd need a new election to break the deadlock. I like the flexibility in our constitution, things generally work out alright.
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:11 (fifteen years ago)
i think the weakness of the queen is actually a strength here. you could imagine a coalition being formed or choosing a leader in some extremely shady way that those outside it have credible objections to. i think this is one of the things critics of the lack of a written constitution worry about.
but while the coalition would have a majority to govern, raise taxes, etc., but the queen could not invite them to do so without creating constitutional problems for herself.
i might be wrong here, but afaik, there have never been problems in the aftermaths of elections that a written constitution would have solved.
― caek, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:26 (fifteen years ago)
FTQ, ya bass
If this is to be believed, either the Tories are fucked or there will need to be an almighty collapse of the Labour vote in other seats
Can certainly see an almighty collapse happening
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:26 (fifteen years ago)
It's not just a question of being seen to have legitimacy either xp, whoever it was would have to have the support of a majority or near-majority of MPs or they wouldn't be able to get anything done.
i mean, simplistic dreams i know, but isn't this maybe an improvement on entrenched party politics?
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:31 (fifteen years ago)
the wouldn't be able to get anything done thing is so obviously incorrect, given that so many governments around the world have coalition governments by default.
― Grandpont Genie, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:34 (fifteen years ago)
Also politicians would focus a lot more on the things they actually disagree about, rather than the things they pretend to disagree about.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:36 (fifteen years ago)
Difference is the parties here aren't used to working with one another - outside of committees - it's not the way our democracy is set up
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:36 (fifteen years ago)
the wouldn't be able to get anything done thing is so obviously incorrect, given that so many governments around the world have coalition governments by default
Eh? Wasn't your question based entirely on there being no coalition? If there is one, there's no problem - but it's for the parties themselves to organise it, not a written constitution.
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:42 (fifteen years ago)
Difference is the parties here aren't used to working with one another - outside of committees
I thought they were all 'pals together' outside of the chamber?
At the least, they're well used to working together, I'm sure...
― Mark G, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:44 (fifteen years ago)
Used to drinking with one another, maybe
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:45 (fifteen years ago)
Given the three parties' official policies on public spending and the role of the market aren't anywhere near as distinct as they like to make out, I can't imagine them having too much trouble.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:49 (fifteen years ago)
most labour mps like most conservative mps more than they like keith vaz, it's true
― caek, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:51 (fifteen years ago)
Where would it leave Punch and Judy though?
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:51 (fifteen years ago)
Halfway between the crocodile and the sausages.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 11:59 (fifteen years ago)
Endless variations on Abbott and Portillo chumminess for the next four years.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 12:00 (fifteen years ago)
What, left wing dim bulbs being patronised by Tory twats?
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 12:03 (fifteen years ago)
"Patronised" - is that what they're calling it now?
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 12:14 (fifteen years ago)
Was going to say something earlier, vis a vis Britain being ready for coalition government, about how the Lib/Lab Pact looms almost as large in Right Wing Mythology as the Winter of Discontent, when, bang on cue, along comes cuddly Ken Clarke to do it for me.
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:32 (fifteen years ago)
How long before a senior Tory just cracks and goes "look, if you don't elect us the City will grind this country into dust, got that?"
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:47 (fifteen years ago)
so what happens if/when the tories lose? is it like in the US where theyd tack way right? cameron would be gone, yes?
― max, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:48 (fifteen years ago)
That was pretty much unsaid, but implied, for every Labour government until Blair (xp)
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:49 (fifteen years ago)
Cameron gone for sure, but suspect they won't swing further right - maybe on foreign policy if need be - but look for another camera-friendly lightweight.
If they fail to form the next government I think they'd be looking at a second election sooner rather than later and this'll impact on any decisions I guess. Potentially Cameron could hold on if another election looks like happening within 12 months.
― and ya thought that shit played out in ILX (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)
xp, cameron would probably have to leave, even if they only lost by a little, since this has kind of become a referendum on the idea of him as a prime minister. i hope they wouldn't lurch right, but i'm not sure how much of an appetite the less rabid younger bunch for another five years.
― caek, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:53 (fifteen years ago)
Potentially Cameron could hold on if another election looks like happening within 12 months.
Yeah, that's probably true.
― caek, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:54 (fifteen years ago)
Honestly don't know what'd happen xp. A large part of the grassroots party seems to really hate Cameron, but the top level nearly all buy into his project. I could see him getting another chance, but then I could also see him ditched for Hague as a sop to the grassroots. A third option would be Boris, and the party mutating into something else entirely.
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:55 (fifteen years ago)
Don't want to get carried away, but I'm starting to think an electable Conservative party will be Conservative only in name within the next few years.
― caek, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:56 (fifteen years ago)
i had the impression that there was a sizeable conservative population in the UK--is this just because i spend too much time reading comments on british news stories?
― max, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:58 (fifteen years ago)
british newspaper commenters are the worst people in the world.
― caek, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:59 (fifteen years ago)
no, youtube commenters are the worst people in the world
― max, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 13:59 (fifteen years ago)
followed by british newspaper commenters, followed by new york post commenters, followed by child rapists
― max, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:00 (fifteen years ago)
If (as seems very likely) some kind of coalition involving the Lib Dems forms the next government, and the price of Lib Dem cooperation is the introduction of some form of proportional representation, the whole face of British party politics could change completely within five years.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:00 (fifteen years ago)
I wouldn't trust the Lib Dems to hold on to many of their principles when offered the chance to wield a bit of power
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:02 (fifteen years ago)
war on cactus
― max, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:03 (fifteen years ago)
See Ireland, Green Party for details
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:04 (fifteen years ago)
(xp to self!) For a start, I don't think one party could ever form a government on its own again. For another thing, I think the votes for Labour and Conservative (and possibly Lib Dem) would collapse even further with more people voting for UKIP / BNP / Green / Socialist Whatever without feeling that their vote was just wasted.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:05 (fifteen years ago)
youtube commenters are the worst people in the world
i quite like the new youtube design but they forgot to hide people's comments along with the dates, ratings etc.
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)
Don't think the Tories will ever agree to PR, so we'll see how quickly the Lib Dems drop that one
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)
Pretty good article on the post-Cameron tories by John Gray in this week's LRB: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v32/n08/john-gray/thatcher-thatcher-thatcher
― Stevie T, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:09 (fifteen years ago)
(to Tom) Well, if nobody can form a government without the Lib Dems then probably one or other of the two big parties will offer them PR as a deal.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:10 (fifteen years ago)
With Cameron facing such an uncertain prospect some Conservatives may conclude that this election is one the party would be better off losing. That would be a serious mistake. If the Conservatives fail to emerge as the largest single party Cameron’s position as leader will surely be challenged, and it is not hard to see a return of the mayhem that kept them out of power for so many years. The small and much resented cabal that imposed a public face of moderation would be rejected, the ideological passions that have remained beneath the surface would re-emerge and the Conservatives would once again become a rancorous, ungovernable rabble.
Let's hope so, eh.
― Stevie T, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:10 (fifteen years ago)
Speaking to the Sunday Times in 1981, Thatcher defined the aim of her policies: ‘Economics are the method; the object is to change the soul.’
*shudder*
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:11 (fifteen years ago)
xp to Tom: it's not like they need a 2/3 majority though, or thatcher's permission or something. the only way labour can form a legitimate coaliton if they come last or a distant second in the popular vote is electoral reform (probably necessary to get the lib dems to join, totally necessary to cockblock the conservatives when they scream about legitimacy). so you've got labour and lib dems supporting some kind of electoral reform. after that it's just hand jobs all round until you can agree on the details.
― caek, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:12 (fifteen years ago)
thread needs more LJ analysis
― caek, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)
starting to think an electable Conservative party will be Conservative only in name within the next few years.
Disagree: As soon as they get in, the whole "we're for the working man" thing will be gone as they rideoff on horses and put up REALLY BIG FENCES and put through the law that allows shooting of trespassers and burglars. And fox hunting.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:15 (fifteen years ago)
(sorry, "electable" rather than "elected" right? Still, though...)
yeah. i'm talking about changes in society (youtube comments, rappers, etc.) rather than the tories. i have no fucking idea what they will do next.
― caek, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:17 (fifteen years ago)
Shit their pants, I reckon
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:18 (fifteen years ago)
stoked for the madness
― caek, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:20 (fifteen years ago)
Agreed. They negotiated away the non-negotiable when they got a sniff of power at Holyrood.
― broad layering (onimo), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/scotland/8630998.stm
Alex Salmond is urging people to vote SNP to get a hung parliament.
I think Scotland probably needs to swing back towards Labour for there to be a hung parliament. I think the "Vote SNP: get Tory" slogan might sway a few people this time around.
― broad layering (onimo), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:45 (fifteen years ago)
A Tory/Lib Dem coalition might do a good job of curbing the worst excesses of the Tories plus making both parties hilarious and unelectable again. Hopefully.
― and ya thought that shit played out in ILX (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:47 (fifteen years ago)
hopefully we could have electable people
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:51 (fifteen years ago)
Has 'vote x, get y' ever worked as a scare tactic?
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)
"z's dead, baby"
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:54 (fifteen years ago)
"Vote SNP: get Tory"
Works for me. Assuming people put not having a Tory government fucking Scotland over above having a stronger SNP voice at Westminster. "The Tories fucked Scotland" is pretty much accepted as fact by most people in my neck of the woods.
That said, I get the feeling half the people in my neck of the woods would be happy to vote BNP to stop all the Poles/Blacks/Terrorists/Asylum Seekers taking their jobs places in the dole queue.
― broad layering (onimo), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:58 (fifteen years ago)
"The Tories fucked Scotland" is pretty much accepted as fact by most people in my neck of the woods.
Not just your neck of the woods. They've only got one MP haven't they?
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:00 (fifteen years ago)
and none in 1997
― caek, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:09 (fifteen years ago)
Thread needs more UKIP.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LT5qRqHHoJo
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)
Now he is posh
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
Good God - that interview is incredible
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)
Every UKIP leader is more insane than the one before, it's quite incredible.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 21:21 (fifteen years ago)
Went to a debate between my constituency candidates tonight and was cheered by seeing the UKIP candidate gradually isolating himself and disengaging from the thrust of the debate, pleasing to see the dialogue looking after itself.
― ogmor, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 22:47 (fifteen years ago)
The Daily Mail goes the extra mile:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1267921/GENERAL-ELECTION-2010-Nick-Clegg-Nazi-slur-Britain.html
― carson dial, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 22:58 (fifteen years ago)
http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content/StaticFile/jpg/2010/Apr/Week3/15612524.jpg vs http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content/StaticFile/jpg/2010/Apr/Week3/15612475.jpg
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 22 April 2010 07:44 (fifteen years ago)
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/22/article-1267921-008F882100000578-941_306x423.jpg
Just look at this guy. I thought he was sitting behind a mixing desk for a moment.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 22 April 2010 07:45 (fifteen years ago)
real-life roffles at the ukip interview
stating the obvious, but our national newspapers really are a bunch of garbage-raking shitehawks
― tomofthenest, Thursday, 22 April 2010 08:13 (fifteen years ago)
I think even the most idiotic Daily Mail reader is likely to go "hang on a minute" when faced with a backlash on this scale.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 April 2010 08:44 (fifteen years ago)
I think you are overestimating idiotic Daily Mail readers
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 22 April 2010 08:46 (fifteen years ago)
I'm going on the "Gordon Brown has messy handwriting when writing to the families of dead squaddies" row from last year.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:02 (fifteen years ago)
i'm an easy lay when it comes to this stuff, but i thought this was kind of great, and if he manages to get this across next thursday (and tonight) then yaow
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXtiCrmeQ8A
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:04 (fifteen years ago)
People need to stop getting carried away. Tories will still win - with a majority to boot.
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:11 (fifteen years ago)
latest polls are around tory 33 lab 27 lib 30. For the tories to get the majority there're various permutations, but either way they need at least an extra 5% of the vote... think its much more likely that we'll get a hung parliament.
― tomofthenest, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:21 (fifteen years ago)
this is sort of basic but i haven't followed english politics properly for years;
assuming a conservative plurality without an overall majority, could labour/libdems form a legitimate coalition govt?
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:22 (fifteen years ago)
5% is easy, the Liberals managed 8-10% last week!
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:22 (fifteen years ago)
Original Guardian articles for info.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/nov/19/eu.germanyhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2003/jun/27/politicalcolumnists.eu
Quite amusing in retrospect of course.
The intriguing mixture of French arrogance and insecurity provides France with a profoundly warped self-image. The Swedes and Danes can be insufferably holier than thou.
― Ned Trifle (Notinmyname), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:22 (fifteen years ago)
Yes. But only because Labour are the current government.
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:24 (fifteen years ago)
... I mean, the sitting government can form a coalition, afaik
Well, precisely, everything to play for still.
― Ned Trifle (Notinmyname), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:26 (fifteen years ago)
doesn't that seem the most likely outcome then given the projections for a hung parliament xp?
i know clegg suggested a while back that he would be obliged to support the largest party but there doesn't seem much chance of a libdem/conservative coalition
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:28 (fifteen years ago)
supposedly in that situation clegg insists brown goes but don't know wtf that means
― conrad, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:30 (fifteen years ago)
clegg's voice funny not quite gravelly like he's smoked a lot like charles kennedy but kind of like he's smoked a lot sounds a bit like a frog or a trumpet now and then when he tries to emphasis things
― conrad, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:32 (fifteen years ago)
lib+con coalition is pretty much inconceivable. depends on the size of the con lead. if it's big then perhaps the conservatives form a minority government for the summer and call another election in october. if it's small then lib+lab coalition government.
so can any other party.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:33 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, if there's a lib+lab coalition then brown pretty much has to go.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:34 (fifteen years ago)
... you could be right, what happened in 1974? (xp)
... Brown won't go
Said it upthread but I fully expect the Lib Dems to jettison their principles at the merest sniff of a share in power, the stumbling block is more likely to be that the Tories wouldn't want to enter any sort of coalition. Can't really see a Labour/ Lib Dem coalition happening unless the Tories do really badly.
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:35 (fifteen years ago)
whatever happens, do not buy GBP if you are a currency speculator.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:36 (fifteen years ago)
Clegg gets brown to name him deputy PM and make election reform top priority, brown resigns, he gets to play at being PM whilst labour has an almighty punchup, coalition falls apart when new leader is unacceptable to him, new election under new rules, Lib Dems go in looking like they have been in power. Clegg becomes PM under new electoral system. (Meanwhile pound drops to parity with the dollar and half a euro if ken Clarke is to be believed).
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:37 (fifteen years ago)
In 1974 the Tories and Liberals tried to form a coalition but couldn't agree, so Labour formed a minority government then called an early election later in the year. I think Labour were the largest party, and presumably embarked on an unambitious programme with support from maverick MPs of other parties, the Ulster Unionists, etc
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:39 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, two elections in 1974 because of the hung parliament. same deal basically.
if there's a lib+lab coalition then brown will be forced out as a condition of lib support of a coalition (and also to give the coalition more legitamacy). pretty sure this has been leaked.
any two parties would gladly form a coalition if it got them into government. (and that includes con.) any politician saying otherwise is campaigning.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:40 (fifteen years ago)
Said it upthread but I fully expect the Lib Dems to jettison their principles at the merest sniff of a share in power
compromise is not entirely unreasonable when you don't have a mandate to govern.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:41 (fifteen years ago)
Isn't voter reform more important to LibDem anoraks than pretty much anything else? I thought it would be a dealbreaker for them. Then again Labour jettisoned all their principles at the first sniff of power so I don't see why the LibDems should be any different.
The other thing here is that voter reform would, presumably, be quite popular with the electorate given how disillusioned they are with the current system.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:42 (fifteen years ago)
So Labour, the largest party, didn't form a coalition, and Tories, the government, tried but failed to form an official coalition, along the lines of what I said upthread... don't know if that's written in stone or anything though
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:42 (fifteen years ago)
compromise is not entirely unreasonable when you don't have a mandate to govern
Like, for instance, carrying on with Gordon Brown as PM?
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:43 (fifteen years ago)
Once the MPs are elected, the party system is basically just a way of organising them - anyone can become PM so long as they have support of a majority of MPs.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:43 (fifteen years ago)
It's not a deal breaker for the lib dem elite these days, I don't think, but they certainly support it, and I don't imagine something like AV (which labour have in their manifesto, but would probably forget if they won a majority) would be very difficult to get into a queen's speech with polls/MP counts as seem likely.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:44 (fifteen years ago)
i think the gordon brown blood sacrifice is less as unmovable principle of the lib dems than something any sane coalition would need to do following his electoral humiliation.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:45 (fifteen years ago)
do we have a thread on the pros and cons of the various voting systems? is STV the best option?
― tomofthenest, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:45 (fifteen years ago)
tried to, but couldn't agree whether to have a poll or a write-in
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:46 (fifteen years ago)
RON
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:47 (fifteen years ago)
i think the gordon brown blood sacrifice is less as unmovable principle of the lib dems than something any sane coalition would need to do following his electoral humiliation
Would it really be a humiliation if he's still able to form some sort of government?
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:48 (fifteen years ago)
He will have lost legitimacy with the public (con. will probably get the biggest share of the popular vote, remember). The lib dems and most labour MPs will not want to be associated with him. So yeah.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:50 (fifteen years ago)
I hope there's a contingency plan for how to physically get him out of the building
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:51 (fifteen years ago)
He will have lost legitimacy with the public (con. will probably get the biggest share of the popular vote, remember). ― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:50 (1 minute ago) Bookmark
this could easily happen even with an outright lab majority
― tomofthenest, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:52 (fifteen years ago)
rugby tackle from the left, won't see you coming.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:53 (fifteen years ago)
most labour MPs will not want to be associated with him.
Not being responsible for any humiliation or loss of legitimacy themselves of course
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:53 (fifteen years ago)
this could easily happen even with an outright lab majority― tomofthenest, Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:52 AM (19 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― tomofthenest, Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:52 AM (19 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
totes. can't really think of any scenario in which brown is PM at the end of the year.
Disagree, I reckon that if Labour form any sort of government, there will be such relief they won't touch Brown for a while
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:55 (fifteen years ago)
.. don't know how long a while is, though
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:56 (fifteen years ago)
well, yes, they're disloyal shits of course. but to be fair, with tv debates, this general election is a more presidential than usual.
the conservative vote is particularly an expression of faith in cameron, since i don't think anyone understands their policies or has the slightest confidence in their front bench.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:56 (fifteen years ago)
LibDem canvassers in my constituency (Labour/LibDem marginal) openly claiming they are closer to Labour than Cons. Could be tactical but if so they are good liars - they seemed genuine. Embarrassing for these people if there's a Lib/Con pact - although Clegg himself is well to the right of most of his party.
LibDem hope must be 100 seats or so with Labour having most seats. This is an absolute nightmare scenario for the Tories and the Tory press, and for tactical reasons they are keeping schtum about how bowel-churningly terrified they are of it. Outcome would be a Lib/Lab coalition committed to PR and the Tories frozen out of power for the foreseeable future, probably until they had completely distanced themselves from the kind of people who currently make up the vast majority of their activists. Conservatism of the Tebbit/Thatcher/Daily Mail/Telegraph sort would be dead in the water.
― frankiemachine, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:56 (fifteen years ago)
although Clegg himself is well to the right of most of his party
Of activists maybe
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:58 (fifteen years ago)
this is through the looking glass ish but wd clegg have a chance of becoming pm in a ld/lab coalition?
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:59 (fifteen years ago)
don't think there will be much relief or gratitude toward brown if labour end up the senior partner of a coalition. they are doing a very good job of keeping internal disagreements quiet this year, but there is no shortage of people who will pull the lever at the first sign of weakness (i.e. 4am, may 7).
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:59 (fifteen years ago)
xp you have canvassers? I don't think I've ever seen one in 15 years of living in this constituency (including the last 4 years working from home)
― tomofthenest, Thursday, 22 April 2010 09:59 (fifteen years ago)
xxp, liberal pm in lib+lab coalition seems v. unlikely. cable chancellor, clegg as home sec much easier to swallow.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:02 (fifteen years ago)
thinking in absence of obvious candidates in a decapitated labour party
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:02 (fifteen years ago)
decapitated as in lose their seats? don't think milliband or johnson are in much danger, are they?
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:04 (fifteen years ago)
lol 41% and 34% majorities in 2005.
nah as in brown gets tae fuck xp
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:05 (fifteen years ago)
gordon brown has a very big head after all
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:06 (fifteen years ago)
haha, i guess johnson is probably the obvious candidate. milliband might have a pop.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:07 (fifteen years ago)
these obscure permutations aside, what do you actually think will happen if you had to call it right now?
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:09 (fifteen years ago)
Johnson? Seriously?
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:10 (fifteen years ago)
Boris is more likely to be PM, I reckon!
I suppose having a lightweight nice guy as leader is the in-thing these days
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:11 (fifteen years ago)
Expecting - narrow Tory overall majority. But really, not a clue.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:12 (fifteen years ago)
OTM
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:13 (fifteen years ago)
Which is why they don't want to go PropRep.
Because of the chance that they might win in the old way.
― Mark G, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:13 (fifteen years ago)
there is a long way to go, but i can't see cameron making ground on the economy, so for today my prediction is:
lab ~270±20con ~280±20lib ~90
lab+lib coalitionPM: johnsonchancellor: cableforeign: millibandhome: clegg
cameron clings on
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:14 (fifteen years ago)
+ AV in first queen's speech
I'm sorry, I can't get my head around the idea of Alan Johnson as Prime Minister
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:16 (fifteen years ago)
don't apologize
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:17 (fifteen years ago)
seriously though, who else could it be in a lib+lab coalition?
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:18 (fifteen years ago)
Andy Burnham.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:18 (fifteen years ago)
Gordon Brown!
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:21 (fifteen years ago)
never heard of him
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:21 (fifteen years ago)
; )
― conrad, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:22 (fifteen years ago)
but with a less natural smile
i think labour would have to have the most MPs for brown to cling on. if that happens then, yeah, i can see him staying.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:24 (fifteen years ago)
6 Apr 18 Apr 22 AprMost seatsCon 1/6 1/5 1/4Lab 7/1 - 4/1Lib Dem 100/1 - 11/1Outright MajorityCon 8/15 13/8 11/8Lab 11/1 12/1 16/1Lib Dem - 25/1 22/1Hung Parliament 13/8 8/13 8/13
Most seatsCon 1/6 1/5 1/4Lab 7/1 - 4/1Lib Dem 100/1 - 11/1
Outright MajorityCon 8/15 13/8 11/8Lab 11/1 12/1 16/1Lib Dem - 25/1 22/1
Hung Parliament 13/8 8/13 8/13
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:26 (fifteen years ago)
can anyone find odds for next pm for anyone other than brown, cameron and clegg?
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:28 (fifteen years ago)
That's worth a punt
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:29 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.oddschecker.com/specials/politics-and-election/next-uk-general-election/next-prime-minister
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:30 (fifteen years ago)
They will have to keep Dave on so he can keep bashing away at his "unelected PM" line.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 22 April 2010 10:31 (fifteen years ago)
"there is a long way to go, but i can't see cameron making ground on the economy, so for today my prediction is:
lab+lib coalitionPM: johnsonchancellor: cableforeign: millibandhome: clegg"
Libs have promised to support largest party. If Cons have most seats, they will certainly have most votes. It will be tricky for Clegg to form coalition with Labour in those circumstances.
He could of course make demands that Cameron won't accept (PR) and say he can't work with Cons, but the Tory press would have a field day about him reneging on his biggest promise. He'll be very reluctant to take the flak. If Labour are dangling PR in front of his nose it'll be a tough decision.
― frankiemachine, Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:10 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxwBzgO7YsM
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:25 (fifteen years ago)
Libs have promised to support largest party
have they said this in public? i thought they were being quite careful to avoid saying anything about their parameters in the event of no majority?
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:25 (fifteen years ago)
Clegg won't form a majority government and he won't be prime minister. That means if he holds the balance of power the biggest thing he could do for his legacy is to be the Lib Dem leader who finally brings about the voting reform they've been craving for decades.
My prediction is for weeks of Clegg-bashing, Brown to be written off as an old irrelevance and a >30 seat Tory majority.
SNP Party Election Broadcast last night: man climbs to top of a (clearly Scottish) mountain, shouts "SCOTLAND!", cut to Alex Salmond's big face saying "Vote SNP for a Scottish Champion, cut to someone on Westminster Bridge hearing "SCOTLAND". The end. Swing voters swung in my house = 0
― broad layering (onimo), Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:28 (fifteen years ago)
that yahoo video is pretty smug and annoying
― went ham in a bad way (stevie), Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:34 (fifteen years ago)
Yes they have. Bone of contention is what this means, ie, most votes or most seats. They've refused to clarify that.
― frankiemachine, Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:40 (fifteen years ago)
i believe you, but if you could find a quote then i would be very interested in the wording
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:41 (fifteen years ago)
I hear that Nick Clegg will ditch the AV+ proposal and go straight for the Enabling Act, confirm/deny?
― Fade to Ugly Dave Gray (King Boy Pato), Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:47 (fifteen years ago)
"One, we will respect the will of the public. The voters are in charge and the decision is theirs. If voters decide that no party deserves an overall majority, then self-evidently the party with the strongest mandate will have a moral right to be the first to seek to govern on its own or, if it chooses, to seek alliances with other parties."
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article6975890.ece
most of us at the time took it as read that this meant they would fall in with the tories, but that was in january.
― joe, Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:47 (fifteen years ago)
i don't read that as a promise by the lib dems to do anything, other than not to try form a government themselves when they get 90 MPs
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:51 (fifteen years ago)
http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash1/hs495.ash1/27048_402004686952_619011952_4491212_1402399_n.jpg
his front page appearances really have tripled in the last week
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:54 (fifteen years ago)
Wobble Democrat? Lame.
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 11:55 (fifteen years ago)
Not sure I can find a quote but I've come across dozens of references to this (usually in the context of Tories complaining that Clegg won't clarify whether he means seats or votes). About 25% of The Times letters page was about this in a recent edition, mainly Tories who want either to make sure they will be part of the coalition if they get most votes or to beat Clegg up meantime for being undemocratic if he goes for seats. On This Week, for example, Portillo argued that since the Lib Dems support PR it would be hypocrisy to form a coalition with Labour if they got more seats than the Tories but less votes. Of course, it's Portillo who's the hypocrite here: you know he wouldn't go near this argument if the Tories were the party whose percentage of seats was expected to be disproportionately larger than their percentage vote.
― frankiemachine, Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:08 (fifteen years ago)
He's fucked if there's a hung parliament. Go for the Tories and he risks losing all those cuddly anti-war metropolitan voters, keep Gordon Brown in power and he'll be absolutely crucified. A Lib-Lab coalition led by someone like David Miliband and it'll be "no mandate to govern, give us another election" all over the place.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:10 (fifteen years ago)
He'd better just win an overall majority himself, then.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:12 (fifteen years ago)
i don't see why they couldn't face down that kind of talk, in the same way gordon brown could ignore the "unelected" jibes. this is the way our political system works: the people spoke, they wanted a mushy coalition. but he'd have to get some big element of lib dem policy through.
― joe, Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:13 (fifteen years ago)
joe otm. assuming you can get two parties to agree to form one, a coalition has a mandate to govern. that's parliamentary democracy. they are a thought of as a weaker government in the uk, at least historically, but they get by in other countries, and how long they lasts depends more on events than on some perceived illegitimacy.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:18 (fifteen years ago)
(although like i said, this does feel like a more presidential election than usual)
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:19 (fifteen years ago)
Who in this bitch is GrimeySimey?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/apr/22/twitter-nick-clegg-newspaper-swipe
― Venga, Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:23 (fifteen years ago)
Bishop Brennan: "That poor child was supposed to go to the House of Lourdes!"
― Check this, in fact. How exciting. He literally cuts the mustard. (snoball), Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:23 (fifteen years ago)
Guess in the end it would depend on the numbers. Idealogically Lib-Dems and Labour are much, much closer than they were in 1974 so I don't think there'd be too much of an issue in them working together. It would depend a lot on when and if Brown would go as to the perceived legitimacy of it, though at the moment it seems probable that no leader will be able to claim that they've got the right to be PM.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:24 (fifteen years ago)
Lib/Lab pact wasn't until after 1974? It was under Callaghan, I think. Wasn't a coalition anyway.
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:28 (fifteen years ago)
hahahahahahahahah
He er, doesn't post here anymore.
― MPx4A, Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:29 (fifteen years ago)
(xp) It was the Tories and Liberals who discussed a coalition in 1974
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:31 (fifteen years ago)
The rapid responses on Twitter indicate just how much shorter the feedback loop now is for the mainstream media and electors – and how dangerous it can be to attack politicians who are riding a wave of popularity.
Whether it will have any effect on the readers either of Twitter or of the newspapers is harder to tell. Clearly, Twitter has never been the favoured stamping ground for Sun, Daily Mail, Daily Express or Daily Telegraph readers. And it is unlikely that any of the papers' editors will be taking notice of what it says.
Well that's kind of the fucking kicker, isn't it chief
― MPx4A, Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:33 (fifteen years ago)
Interesting the direction of the red and green arrows on the daily mail comments today. Kinda hope it is their readers seeing through the sewage, rather than the libs paying per click.
― tomofthenest, Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:39 (fifteen years ago)
Signor Passantino?
― Venga, Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:46 (fifteen years ago)
reynolds.
― tomofthenest, Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:47 (fifteen years ago)
or passantino pretending to be reynolds
trust no-one
― acoleuthic, Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:49 (fifteen years ago)
not even yourself
― Check this, in fact. How exciting. He literally cuts the mustard. (snoball), Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:51 (fifteen years ago)
oh shi-
― acoleuthic, Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:53 (fifteen years ago)
dun dun dundun dun dun dundun dun dun dundun dun dun dundunbladabaaaaa bladabaaaaaaa bladabaaaaaaaaaabah bah!d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-dun dun dundun dun dun dundun dun dun dundun dun dun dundunta-daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!!!!!!!!!!!!
― Check this, in fact. How exciting. He literally cuts the mustard. (snoball), Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:56 (fifteen years ago)
Shake Dowwwwnnnn...
― Mark G, Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:57 (fifteen years ago)
If any of your ILX force should be zinged or Suggest Banned, the moderators will disavow any knowledge of your actions...
― Check this, in fact. How exciting. He literally cuts the mustard. (snoball), Thursday, 22 April 2010 12:58 (fifteen years ago)
Interesting the direction of the red and green arrows on the daily mail comments today. Kinda hope it is their readers seeing through the sewage, rather than the libs paying per click.― tomofthenest, Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:39 PM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― tomofthenest, Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:39 PM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
daily mail commenters are all guardian readers. it's a testament to their stupidity that they insist on contributing to a newspaper that hurts britain.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 13:01 (fifteen years ago)
GRIMEY SIMEY wrote this on thread Stephen Malkmus' "Phantasies" in Sears TV ad on board I Love Music on 13-Sep-2005MY FAVOURITE ADFVERT IS FOR TAMPAXX IT HAS RILO KILEY SINGING ABOUT FANNY BATTER MATHEW DO YOU LIKE RILO KILEY SONGS IF THEY WERE ABOUT LADIES DFOING BLOOOD IN THERE PANTSSSS???/
LKEEEEP ON LIVING THE DREAAM!!!!!!!!!!!1111111111111
He's calmed down a bit since then, it seems.
― MPx4A, Thursday, 22 April 2010 13:05 (fifteen years ago)
They love Twitter at the Telegraph, they will definitely cover it.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 April 2010 13:13 (fifteen years ago)
http://twitter.com/billdeedes
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 22 April 2010 13:15 (fifteen years ago)
Meanwhile a Daily Mail & General Trust-owned local paper appears to like the BNP rather a lot.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 April 2010 13:20 (fifteen years ago)
Interesting SEO stuff on the right there. I bet those dudes will all love being tagged on that piece.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 April 2010 13:22 (fifteen years ago)
I thought I was being canvassed last night and was excited because in my last home (safe seat) nobody would ever bother sending anyone round, but anyway some guy buzzed on the door and asked if I was planning to vote Lib Dem and I said "might do, not decided yet" (thought this would encourage a sales pitch) and the guy just said "ok, bye then"
Should I have asked specific questions? Or did he just want me to say "oh yes, you can be sure of my vote" so that he could ask me to let him in to leaflet the whole block?
― a subplot excised from Latawnya the Naughty Horse (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 22 April 2010 13:26 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.london24.com/picturegalleries/johnprescottlondon24/images/IMG_2529.jpg
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 22 April 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)
I have just been told that two female Labour volunteers were knocked to the ground in a scuffle in Poplar after they were attacked by two men in Prescott masks. Their identities were allegedly subsequently revealed as Tory council candidates, one of whom is allegedly called Martin Coxall, who is now in police custody.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 22 April 2010 15:03 (fifteen years ago)
as Tory council candidates, one of whom is allegedly called Martin Coxall, who is now in police custody.
I annoy myself by instantly heading for twitter or Facebook to see what I can find out about people (twitter account gone, fan of Ronald Reagan, Krispy Kreme Doughnuts and Forbidden Planet).
― broad layering (onimo), Thursday, 22 April 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)
Coxall Twitter feed.
http://twitter.com/polfret
― Venga, Thursday, 22 April 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)
# #nickcleggsfault ten thousand spoons when all you need is a knife. about 3 hours ago via Tweetie
* Reply * Retweet
# #nickcleggsfault a no smoking sign on your cigarette break about 3 hours ago via Tweetie
# #nickcleggsfault a traffic jam, when you're already late about 3 hours ago via Tweetie
#
― went ham in a bad way (stevie), Thursday, 22 April 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)
BNP facing Marmite legal action
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)
However, Mr Griffin went on to say that the Marmite jar had been added in reaction to a recent advertising campaign for Marmite which he said mocked the BNP.
In the Marmite campaign two spoof political parties, the Love Party and the Hate Party, compete in a mock election.
The BNP claims the Hate Party was "clearly based" on itself.
own goal there, nick.
― went ham in a bad way (stevie), Thursday, 22 April 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)
Paranoid or what?
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)
So tonight Cameron and Brown are supposedly planning on throwing weak on defence at Clegg for not endorsing the renewal of trident and the fucking eurofighter. Is there any way he can (or should?) turn it round and respond with something along the lines of: "I'm unwilling to suck defence contractor cock and piss more taxpayer money away on stupid toys that the country doesn't need."?
Yes, in those words.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Thursday, 22 April 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)
Mwahahaha: http://www.newser.com/off-the-grid/post/448/will-murdoch-lose-britain.html
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 22 April 2010 15:54 (fifteen years ago)
I love the sort of insane shit that happens during British elections.
xpost - "it costs £100bn that we can't afford" is a pretty good retort I'd say. If I were Gordon Brown I'd sit back and let Cameron do all the attacking and then watch the sparks fly. He's probably relieved at not being the victim of the Murdoch-Dacre attack dogs for a bit.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 April 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)
Possible replies to "more than we can afford" are: that 100bn figure is seriously dodgy at best, which numbers wonk Gordon Brown may point out; and there's no shortage of defense analysts they can wheel out to say that we do need it, despite the "not the cold war any more" stuff.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)
not clear to me that trident is a vote winner for either side.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)
The Sky debate is being chaired by Adam Boulton. I watched him at a Labour press conference last week asking questions that were basically repeated Tory talking points e.g. "Isn't your National Insurance increase a Tax On Jobs that'll put 100,000 hard working British people on the dole?"
― broad layering (onimo), Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)
yes, but,
On the 22 July 2006, Boulton married Anji Hunter a former spin doctor to Tony Blair, The wedding was attended by Blair and a number of current and former ministers including David Blunkett, Tessa Jowell and Peter Hain, as well as celebrities like Mick Hucknall.[1]
sky has an agenda, but i'd be staggered if they tried it on during a debate, and it's a bit ott to suggest boulton himself is in some way biased (although if he is, i think the conservatives have the best claim)
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)
yes but does any of that make him anything other than hostile to a Brownite govt?
xp
― broad layering (onimo), Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)
are you seriously suggesting he's going to try to influence the outcome of the debate?
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)
sounds like a pfunkboy theory about refereeing
he's a fuckin cheating diving cunt!
It is possible for chairs to influence debates, even in the order in which they direct questions & cut time, etc.
I wasn't saying "OMG corrupt" - more "debate chair was on TV being very openly hostile to the Prime Minister the other day" - he won't be attempting to turn the debate but this sort of thing surely influences the way people behave towards one another (on both sides).
― broad layering (onimo), Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)
Then again Paxman's openly hostile to everyone and they keep turning up in his studio for more. Maybe they like it.
― broad layering (onimo), Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)
Boulton's definitely got more Toryish since his mate Blair left office
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:11 (fifteen years ago)
debate chair was on TV being very openly hostile to the Prime Minister the other day
well, he's a professional journalist in the UK. being aggressively skeptical to whoever is in charge of something until they resign or make a mistake is basically his job : ( shitty job if you ask me, but there you go. of the three chairs, he's the only "practicing" journalist.
and in the absence of a clear front-runner (and before the lib dem surge) the debates are basically there for people to antagonize the incumbent. i don't think that's part of a plan. that's just how it works.
true, there was some cutting and direction influence from stewart last week, but he seemed like he was making it up at random, rather than attempting to influence things. then again, boulton is a bit brighter.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)
otm x1000000
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)
So, Pax is doing Cameron on Friday.
― Mark G, Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:18 (fifteen years ago)
good/only move.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)
Later in the afternoon, in a coming-apart-at-the-seams scenario, Rebekah Wade/Brooks and Murdoch’s son, James—who will both face the wrath of Murdoch senior if they don’t produce a winner—stormed over to the Independent, breached its security systems, barged into the offices of the Independent’s editor-in-chief and top executive, Simon Kelner, and commenced, in Brit-speak, a giant row. Their point was that newspaper publishers don’t slag off other newspaper publishers in polite Britain, but also the point was to remind Kelner that he wasn’t just slagging off another publisher, he was slagging off the Murdochs, damn it. Indeed, the high point of the screaming match was Wade/Brooks, in a fit of apoplexy and high drama, neck muscles straining, saying to Kelner: “And I invited you to Blenheim in the first place!” Blenheim being the Murdoch family retreat and the highest social destination for all Murdoch loyalists and ambitious Brits in the media.
lol heard about this on today programme this morning, could not believe what i was hearing
― went ham in a bad way (stevie), Thursday, 22 April 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)
RT AIannucci Doing Sky and Indy. Should I mention James Murdoch storming Indy offices on Sky tonight or Indy on Saturday? #leadersdebate
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 22 April 2010 17:32 (fifteen years ago)
What a disgusting spectacle on the front pages of the tory press this morning, what a bunch of blatant shitbaggery.
Also, holy shit at that newser piece, who the fuck do these pieces of shit think they are? I wish they were DEAD.
― dead flower :( (Pashmina), Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)
this sounds so lacking in conviction - Brown's faltering
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:02 (fifteen years ago)
Cameron keeping it simpler, riffing on cliches, stuck record but sounds more convincing than Brown
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)
Clegg's by far the best, obv
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)
I was hoping the Murdoch douchebaggery would die off with Rupes.
― ô_o (Nicole), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:08 (fifteen years ago)
the weather doesn't stop at the white cliffs of dover! dammit why am i finding myself cheering for this clegg character oh wait
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:09 (fifteen years ago)
clegg is kind of owning this so far
― pollos da don (tpp), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)
^drink
― Steve Sharta (cozen), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:15 (fifteen years ago)
he really, really is as well
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:15 (fifteen years ago)
but terrorism
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:16 (fifteen years ago)
ffs sky news' enormous ticker graphic things are covering brown's chin
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)
this bit is kinda boring
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:22 (fifteen years ago)
brown coming back into it somewhat
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)
well there is a cracking game of football on ch5 if you have already known anything about politics and politicians and learnt that its just gonna be boring shit from last thursday.
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:24 (fifteen years ago)
NUKES
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)
what have you personally done
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:28 (fifteen years ago)
If Nick had balls he'll tell people to stop having kids if they want to stop climate change.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:29 (fifteen years ago)
no one zinging cameron on this yet
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:29 (fifteen years ago)
"get real" the new "i agree with nick"
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:30 (fifteen years ago)
This isn't just insulation, this is Marks and Spencers insulation.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:31 (fifteen years ago)
He insulates his home every six months? That's a bit wasteful.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)
cameron is so weak
― Steve Sharta (cozen), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)
best question ever, fuck the pope
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)
lol @ this chap with the "Would you like to lose a lot of votes now?" question.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)
did cameron just say "i like people of different faiths, they work in prison!"?
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)
"big society at home, little britain abroad" nice zing
who gives a shit about the pope tbh? What is with some of these questions?
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)
total waste of a question
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)
these questions are shit compared to last week
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:39 (fifteen years ago)
is this a burning foreign affairs question?
― Steve Sharta (cozen), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:39 (fifteen years ago)
they're just ignoring them and hitting their talking points.
everyone agrees. move on.
really fucking wish someone turned around and went 'he supports kid fuckers, so fuck him'. would get the daily mail vote automatically and win the shit.
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)
cameron was about to riff on abortion there
― Steve Sharta (cozen), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)
adam boulton going to try to get them to argue about religion now, this should be worthwhile
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)
brown is emerging as the winner of this one, somehow
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
Er "open section" wtf?
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)
xpostHe's certainly a lot stronger than last week.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)
turning the football back on.
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)
Cameron is amusingly shit, but hoping for a big Clegg push now
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)
telling people what rights he's going to give them = NAGL
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)
what the fuck was that re: telegraph?
― pollos da don (tpp), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)
oooh what is boulton doing there? that was outrageous!
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)
sorry since when can the chair chip-in like that?
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, that's not in the rules surely?
― Steve Sharta (cozen), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:49 (fifteen years ago)
sky thinking they're avuncular
my stream skipped : (
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:49 (fifteen years ago)
bah, did something exciting and controversial happen and i missed it? (wandered off to watch some paint dry when they were all not dissing the Pope)
― ailsa, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:50 (fifteen years ago)
that has seriously pissed me off
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:50 (fifteen years ago)
when it came to Clegg's turn to answer Boulton chipped in with "You were on the front page of the Telegraph today, weren't you Nick?"?
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)
boulton chipped in with a 'you were on the front of the telegraph' quip ad-hominem
clegg dismissed it out of hand. well handled. he must be raging tho, I'd imagine
― Steve Sharta (cozen), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)
they didn't really deal with the pope question, brown was most on point.
― ogmor, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)
Brown just slew Cameron
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)
Blimey, Brown's doing ok so far!
― Bob Six, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:53 (fifteen years ago)
Thanks all, that sounds well out of order.
― ailsa, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:53 (fifteen years ago)
He should have responded with "but tomorrow, you'll still be a cunt." given that he's Churchill an' all.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:53 (fifteen years ago)
Although he'll probably be on the front page of the telegraph tomorrow as well.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)
Oh my gosh!
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:55 (fifteen years ago)
Now that's a question
"women, and you are one of them..." brilliant
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:55 (fifteen years ago)
Brown's biggest challenge so far, this
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:55 (fifteen years ago)
will love that accent for all time, not been enough of it tonight
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)
Aye, brilliant way of personalising your sentence at EXACTLY the wrong place. Public speaking at its best.
― ailsa, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)
Brown is doing no worse than last week, can't see much changing except slight drift backwards from clegg peak.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:58 (fifteen years ago)
clegg is killing it again tho, he gives very good debate. he's very definitive
cameron looks dead on his feet
― Steve Sharta (cozen), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:59 (fifteen years ago)
clegg/brown teasing is so weird
― ogmor, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, cameron is not going to win this election on these debates
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)
Cameron, hypocritical cunt of the year
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)
was that david cameron making up a policy on the spot?
― ogmor, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)
very rich of cameron to accuse anyone else of scaring people with LIES
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)
brown being kind of a bad ass here
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, that's what I was referring to
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)
if it's disgusting to frighten people during an election, why is david cameron's face on national television?
― Steve Sharta (cozen), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)
Hey, have you been reading my tweets?
('Cameron doesn't believe in scaring people during an election - why does he have his face on the posters, then?')
― emil.y, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)
I hate them all, mind you.
― emil.y, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)
When all else fails: MY DEAD SON!
― carson dial, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)
Does Nick Clegg have a dead kid yet?
― emil.y, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)
witney. one of cameron's. stitch up.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)
Boulton has a fucking cheek.
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)
@Simonpegg: David Cameron just told an 84 year old woman he was going to do something in 2016.
― Steve Sharta (cozen), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:09 (fifteen years ago)
Trying to follow the debate via tweets and this thread is proving difficult.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)
good line from clegg about no-one here deserving an outright majority
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)
Foxy foreign wife trumps dead kid IMO. Xxposts
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)
@Glinner #LeadersDebate "I'm not a man of faith". That's it, I'm voting Lib Dem.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)
cameron and brown keep ignoring the question. boulton over the line, but his basic point is quite right.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)
war council y'guys
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)
v. good zing there cameron
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
probably the first one of the debates
I thought the fact that Clegg could say "I'm not a man of faith" openly was saying something good about Britain, not anything good about Clegg himself.
― emil.y, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)
Agreed.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)
Cameron's zing was good but kinda meaningless - zing for zing's sake
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)
have you seen a televised political debate before?
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)
I missed the zing due to making a terrible banking/wanking joke on twitter - what did he say?
― emil.y, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
yeah but it didn't even really refer to anything relevant
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
xp on clegg's atheism
it's a good side-effect of something more neutral
― ogmor, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
not relevant? the question was about coalition government, the other two were talking about something else.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)
Not sure community service for illegal immigrants "coming out of the shadows" is a great idea.
― ogmor, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)
it was the first joke of the debates that wasn't terribly delivered, it got a laugh, it's about what is going to end up being a major part of the election now that an outright majority looks unlikely. wishful thinking to pretend it was meaningless or irrelevant.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)
"immigration was not a political issue in the past" - words of wisdom from the party of enoch powell and the birmingham smethwick campaign.
― joe, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)
it just seemed like a good but throwaway line that won't cause anything except surface damage
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:22 (fifteen years ago)
Depressing how they're now raking over the same ground as last week.
The others should have slaughtered Brown on pensions and they failed to.
"Jobs tax" hand totally overplayed now.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:22 (fifteen years ago)
and now Clegg just got the second good zing in anyway :P
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)
ok that was pretty good
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)
Well done Dave on capturing the UKIP vote, you slimy lying fuck.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)
the answers to this question are identical to those last week
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)
Dave harking back to some non-existent era
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)
Brown should have ended on an Ashcroft zing there.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)
could you kick a ball down the street? xp
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)
David Cameron thinks the M5 runs near Bradford. Observant work from the leader of the party that wrecked the North of England.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)
have sky news just turned down brown's mic?
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)
xps
What he say? What he say? Dam,n I knew I should have watched this...
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)
cameron's obviously been studying why clegg got a poll boost: every time clegg and brown debate something, he accuses them of bickering and tries to present the tories as the sensible alternative to squabbling idiots. which was pretty much clegg's m.o. last time.
― joe, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, clegg being pulled into the fray a bit this week, not looking as above the shit
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)
What he say?
To paraphrase:Dave "Nobody was worried about immigration into this country until Labour broke Britain"
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)
Did Dave not meet any black people this week?
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)
no clear winner, don't worry though, press will create a narrative
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)
clegg doing his summing up like a presenter thing, so crafty.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:31 (fifteen years ago)
really good closer by Clegg I thought
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:31 (fifteen years ago)
ok that was an absolutely booming closing speech.
advocating a "break from the last 13 years" seems incongruous w/ the general "chill out we won't cut/stop too many labour initiatives" damage control cameron's been attempting lately, clegg can pull off more positive change rhetoric
― ogmor, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)
Brown > Clegg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cameron >>> aspirations
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:33 (fifteen years ago)
Clegg the winner, but not as conclusively as last time. Brown did OK. Cameron wasn't terrible but he didn't do what he had to do.
― Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
lol bbc first move to see what the SNP think of it
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
Clegg's closing speech was awful! He just borrows Blair's 1997 sincerity and promise of change sales pitch wholesale.
― Bob Six, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
Clegg the winner, but not as conclusively as last time. Brown did OK. Cameron wasn't terrible but he didn't do what he had to do.― Zelda Zonk, Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:34 PM (14 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Zelda Zonk, Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:34 PM (14 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
yep.
Clegg's closing speech was awful! He just borrows Blair's 1997 sincerity and promise of change sales pitch wholesale.― Bob Six, Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:34 PM (15 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Bob Six, Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:34 PM (15 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
yeah, 1997-2001 under john major was miserable, wasn't it.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)
miliband: "cameron had no answers on free eye tests" jesus
― joe, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)
haha what a spaz
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:36 (fifteen years ago)
The people speak (or at least the people ITV have locked in a room) - Brown 47. Clegg 42. Cameron 12 - surely Cameron couldn't have been that bad?
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
Miliband looks like he's got hepatitis.
― Bob Six, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
ashdown spinning way better than the others except for unfortunate "master of the debate" phrase
― joe, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
xxp, no
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
The people speak (pt.2 - Guardian poll) 63.5% Nick Clegg 28.2% Gordon Brown 8.3% David Cameron (lol)
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
Brown won this for me, narrowly from Clegg
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)
Channel 4:
Nick Clegg: 52% Gordon Brown: 31% David Cameron: 17%
― Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)
The Conservativehome liveblog 'fact check' is hilariously bad:
8.40pm FACTCHECK: Brown said: "My first thoughts will always be for our dedicated forces, for our troops, for our professional forces". Lord Guthrie said Brown was ‘the most unsympathetic Chancellor of the Exchequer as far as defence was concerned'.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)
oh dave. narratives are a bitch, huh?
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)
But what does THE SUN SAY?
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)
The people speak pt.3 (YouGov) David Cameron 36% Nick Clegg 32% Gordon Brown 29% - going out on a limb there.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)
looooooooooooool
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)
that is ridiculous...Cameron clearly did worse than either Clegg or Brown
― Bob Six, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:46 (fifteen years ago)
yougovs website now says:
Service Unavailable
The service is temporarily unavailable. Please try again later
Crashed under the weight of people going - you what?
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:46 (fifteen years ago)
Is that the same Yougov whose co-founder is now a Tory PPC?
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:47 (fifteen years ago)
pretty much agree with all this from the economist liveblog:
21.42 Apparently a YouGov flash poll gives Cameron the victory. Not sure I agree -- Clegg was very strong again -- but Cameron certainly raised his game. It was Brown who failed to connect, I think.-good on pensions but very strident on defence. But the point that various people made, that the election is coming down to hope versus fear, is a key one. I think Cameron managed the balance well and Clegg definitely did hope, in spades.
21.36 I think Clegg emerges, once again, the winner, but by a far smaller margin than last time. Cameron connected with the camera. And both he and Clegg have an instinctive courtesy during other people's contributions that Brown needs to think about. Brown grimaces, shakes his head, smiles contemptuously when the others speak. Clegg and Cameron both maintain a courteous attention. Small point, but telling.
21.34 It's a shame that the spinners bring it all down to free eye tests.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:47 (fifteen years ago)
anyone getting worked up about bias in a post-debate flash poll is wasting their time. even the pollsters admit they are bullshit.
― caek, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)
Enjoyed Cameron responding to Clegg in Paxmand attack dog mode by going "You're reminding me of Gordon last week, it's like....uh, it's like another...uh...replay"
― MPx4A, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)
"let's find out what the all-important newspaper journalists thought" um no
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:51 (fifteen years ago)
http://perspicacious.co.uk/wp-content/plugins/wp-o-matic/cache/e6d0b__45961871_wadebody226_afp.jpghttp://www.liderdigital.com/imagenes/noticias/foto2/James_Murdoch.jpg
RIP big men
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)
Quick, while it's still there: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouGov
YouGov is an international internet-based market research firm launched in the UK in May 2000 by Stephan Shakespeare (now Chief Innovation Officer) and Nadhim Zahawi (CEO). In 2005 the company opened an office in the Middle East, YouGovSiraj, and in 2007 it further expanded by acquiring market research firms in the USA, Germany and Scandinavia, which are now part of the YouGov Group.[1] YouGov is a member of the British Polling Council. They are known for talking complete and utter bollocks.
― emil.y, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
(on sky news) wow one of the "all-important newspaper journalists" just actually said that Brown needs to talk less about policy because "it goes over people's heads". Christ.
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:54 (fifteen years ago)
The people speak pt.4 (ComRes) David Cameron 30% Nick Clegg 33% Gordon Brown 30% - more like it
― ears are wounds, Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
Loved Cameron's "stop frightening people during an election campaign" refrain. You going to tell that to your mates at the Sun and the Mail, Dave?
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)
I presume Sky News is saying Cameron won it (as they did last week)?
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)
Thought Cameron seemed v tired at the beginning but he got better. His answer in immigration was clear and decisive - not at all to my taste I shd add, but I bet it goes down better than the other two, especially Clegg who started sounding a bit batshit.
Brown's whole 'I'm not a debater, I'm a statesman and experienced in government thing' didn't really cut the mustard and he and the camera avoid each other like bad acquaintances. Clegg generally strong but wdnt be surprised if the Tory press go to town on this debate.
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
xxpostYeah, that sounds about right.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
Brown repeatedly pledging to sort out things he's had 13 years to sort out was starting to get painful by the end.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:04 (fifteen years ago)
Clegg generally strong but wdnt be surprised if the Tory press go to town on this debate
I suspect they'll do this no matter what actually happened.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:05 (fifteen years ago)
Worrying for Labour that in the Comres poll, 47% think Brown exceeded expectations but Labour share is stuck on 24%.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)
Daily Mail headline - Cameron is the comeback kid: Tory leader pips Clegg in second leaders' debate as Brown brings up the rear
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)
The Sun - Cam's Slam Dunk
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:12 (fifteen years ago)
QFT
― and ya thought that shit played out in ILX (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:14 (fifteen years ago)
xp they're presumably hoping, for the first time, that none of their readers watch sky
― joe, Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:15 (fifteen years ago)
ahahaha
― MPx4A, Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:16 (fifteen years ago)
What the fuck was going on with Ed Balls' fake tan btw?
― and ya thought that shit played out in ILX (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:16 (fifteen years ago)
campbellclaret Sky cut to man yawning as GB speaks. Is James Murdoch in the control room?about 2 hours ago via web
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)
Damnnnnnnn I did not realise how much Adam Boulton looks like GARY GLITTER.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 22 April 2010 22:47 (fifteen years ago)
Did any of the other leaders get an "over the shoulder" shot?http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/23/article-1268078-0942930E000005DC-814_634x532_popup.jpg
― Ned Trifle II, Friday, 23 April 2010 08:36 (fifteen years ago)
everyone is so mean to gordon brown
― caek, Friday, 23 April 2010 08:40 (fifteen years ago)
I didn't understand why Brown was trying to peg Clegg as 'anti-American'. Any ideas?
― yes we kenya (suzy), Friday, 23 April 2010 08:44 (fifteen years ago)
"Oh boy, the Iranians are going to love you Nick..."ba dum pish!"Thank you, I'll be here all week for the next five years if I can manage it!"
― Check this, in fact. How exciting. He literally cuts the mustard. (snoball), Friday, 23 April 2010 08:44 (fifteen years ago)
lolteabagger
This morning's FT headline is: "Brown and Cameron fight back as election becomes three horse race"
WAHT THE FUCK IS HAPPENING IN THIS ELECTION?
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Friday, 23 April 2010 08:47 (fifteen years ago)
xxp, i think the idea is to paint clegg and the lib dems as outside the mainstream on foreign policy. if you define the mainstream as MPs then they are. if you define is the electorate, then he isn't, so i'm not sure how well this is going to work, but the "eccentric" angle is one of the few things labour can zing the lib dems on, so i don't blame him for trying.
― caek, Friday, 23 April 2010 08:49 (fifteen years ago)
Loved Cameron's "stop frightening people during an election campaign" refrain
http://conservativehome.blogs.com/.a/6a00d83451b31c69e20120a87d8010970b-500wi
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 23 April 2010 08:52 (fifteen years ago)
'Death tax' has the greasy paw prints of Frank Luntz all over it.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Friday, 23 April 2010 08:56 (fifteen years ago)
... you see what I did there?
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 23 April 2010 08:57 (fifteen years ago)
Why do they keep calling it death tax instead of inheritance tax? Surely inheritance tax actually appeals to people's sense of outrage more than framing it as a tax you don't pay until after you die.
― Matt DC, Friday, 23 April 2010 09:06 (fifteen years ago)
Sure enough, they're now using material from certain race hate comedians ((C) Dom Passantino):
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/4/23/1272009474144/A-new-Conservative-poster-003.jpgp
― Fade to Ugly Dave Gray (King Boy Pato), Friday, 23 April 2010 09:06 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, I know, lol. And Brown was stupid putting his jokes down - just learn them (they're not very good anyway)!
― Ned Trifle II, Friday, 23 April 2010 09:06 (fifteen years ago)
http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/6789/anewconservativeposter0.jpg (xp)
― Fade to Ugly Dave Gray (King Boy Pato), Friday, 23 April 2010 09:07 (fifteen years ago)
gordon brown's jokes, and his face while he delivers them, seem like he wrote them himself
― caek, Friday, 23 April 2010 09:08 (fifteen years ago)
Is Campbell writing his jokes? I'm sure they'd be a lot funnier if Mandelson was writing them.
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 23 April 2010 09:10 (fifteen years ago)
Sun going after that Hague 14 pints a day vibe...http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01030/election_superspla_1030337a.jpg
― Ned Trifle II, Friday, 23 April 2010 09:10 (fifteen years ago)
http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01030/election_superspla_1030337a.jpg
so so desperate
― went ham in a bad way (stevie), Friday, 23 April 2010 09:12 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not sure that's even him
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 23 April 2010 09:14 (fifteen years ago)
If we end up with a hung parliament, this will all look like the anguished howl of a press that knows its influence is in decline.
― Matt DC, Friday, 23 April 2010 09:14 (fifteen years ago)
Handy cut out and keep guide to to-days headlines - Mirror one rather odd.http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_xbFrx50EjMc/S9FLZ_R31tI/AAAAAAAAD9Y/_ho9OhcpjLk/s400/front.gif
― Ned Trifle II, Friday, 23 April 2010 09:15 (fifteen years ago)
Is that a half pint glass?
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Friday, 23 April 2010 09:15 (fifteen years ago)
Full of milk, yes
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 23 April 2010 09:16 (fifteen years ago)
If we end up with a hung parliament, this will all look like the anguished howl of a press that knows its influence is in decline
the death throes are a sordid sight indeed
― nakhchivan, Friday, 23 April 2010 09:22 (fifteen years ago)
so how did the debate actually go?
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Friday, 23 April 2010 09:26 (fifteen years ago)
Have you seen that episode of Futurama where the Presidential candidates are called John Jackson and Jack Johnson?
― and ya thought that shit played out in ILX (Noodle Vague), Friday, 23 April 2010 09:28 (fifteen years ago)
It was a bit boring this time
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 23 April 2010 09:37 (fifteen years ago)
Adam "Unbiased" Boulton sticking the boot into Cleggy, completely against the rules of the debate, was the one WTF moment for me
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 23 April 2010 09:39 (fifteen years ago)
I did wonder wtf that was about
― and ya thought that shit played out in ILX (Noodle Vague), Friday, 23 April 2010 09:44 (fifteen years ago)
Basically this: http://www.downingstreetfighter.com/
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Friday, 23 April 2010 09:45 (fifteen years ago)
Again I have to say that Boulton is a very weird-looking man.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Friday, 23 April 2010 09:45 (fifteen years ago)
Also, as my attention wandered and I wasn't paying as much attention to what was going on on screen, I found it difficult to tell Cameron and Clegg apart at times - something about the tone of their voices, but then Cameron was basically doing a Nick Clegg impression (in place of his usual Tony Blair impression)
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 23 April 2010 09:45 (fifteen years ago)
Yes! I said this to Mrs V last night. I was playing Pic Pic and not really watching the screen and Cameron & Clegg's voices were nigh indistinguishable most of the time.
― and ya thought that shit played out in ILX (Noodle Vague), Friday, 23 April 2010 09:52 (fifteen years ago)
they have quite different accents though the cadences are pretty similar
― nakhchivan, Friday, 23 April 2010 09:58 (fifteen years ago)
they all sound the same to me etc
― and ya thought that shit played out in ILX (Noodle Vague), Friday, 23 April 2010 10:01 (fifteen years ago)
i blame pic pic
― nakhchivan, Friday, 23 April 2010 10:08 (fifteen years ago)
Having attributed Clegg's success at week's debate to his ability to speak directly to the camera, it was pretty weak to see Sky cutting about all over the place whenever he opened his mouth, whilst the director only cut away from Cameron talking if it was someone laughing at one of his jokes.
― James Mitchell, Friday, 23 April 2010 10:15 (fifteen years ago)
I'm still annoyed that Sky was given parity with terrestrial broadcasters in taking a turn televising the debates.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Friday, 23 April 2010 10:28 (fifteen years ago)
Yah, Channel 5 debate with Ian Wright moderating would have been something
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 23 April 2010 10:35 (fifteen years ago)
Yes, this, definitely. I was completely bemused as to why they put one on Sky. It's not like EVERY terrestrial channel is the BBC.
― emil.y, Friday, 23 April 2010 10:41 (fifteen years ago)
sop to the antipodean overlord
― tomofthenest, Friday, 23 April 2010 10:47 (fifteen years ago)
American, these days, supposedly
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 23 April 2010 10:48 (fifteen years ago)
Tories wanted at least 1 debate on home turf, innit
― and ya thought that shit played out in ILX (Noodle Vague), Friday, 23 April 2010 10:49 (fifteen years ago)
I've got Sky News on my freeview - I thought it basically was a terrestrial channel now?
― Ismael Klata, Friday, 23 April 2010 10:52 (fifteen years ago)
It's on Freeview, yes, but not everyone has that either
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 23 April 2010 10:57 (fifteen years ago)
a lot of people can't get freeview ( or can't afford to buy a decoder )
― tomofthenest, Friday, 23 April 2010 10:57 (fifteen years ago)
They're dirt cheap!
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 23 April 2010 10:58 (fifteen years ago)
In short it's because Sky News were the channel that campaigned very hard for the debate. I loathe 24 hour rolling news, but I have to say that Sky News does its job pretty much as well, if not, perhaps, better than anyone else. It's not any more noticeably right-wing than any other tv rolling news, which is inherently knee-jerk and lowest-common denominator populist - it's all tabloid pap basically.
If you were to see the influence of the right-wing Murdoch stable anywhere, it would be in the form of someone like Kay Burley, and possibly the ludicrous Eamonn Holmes. Other than that, it's got experienced tv journalists and political commentators, doing what they're good at - shit stirring, then poking about in the shit to see what they see.
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Friday, 23 April 2010 10:59 (fifteen years ago)
It's more professional than News 24 but I definitely detect a slight right wing bias
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 23 April 2010 11:01 (fifteen years ago)
is there a reason all 3 could not have been on the bbc? (which is supposed to be impartial by defintion surely?)
― pollos da don (tpp), Friday, 23 April 2010 11:02 (fifteen years ago)
xxp if you're on a state pension of £95 a week ( or less dep on your NI contributions), £25 for a few extra telly channels is a lot of money.
― tomofthenest, Friday, 23 April 2010 11:02 (fifteen years ago)
Sky's become pretty good - I've surprised myself by watching it for big events like Obama's inauguration. Sky lets the pictures speak for themselves, whereas BBC seems to have decided that what's needed is Huw Edwards talking all over it.
― Ismael Klata, Friday, 23 April 2010 11:03 (fifteen years ago)
because the idea that the BBC is impartial might have grassroot Tories frothing at the gob.
― Mark G, Friday, 23 April 2010 11:04 (fifteen years ago)
Our landlord is in the middle of installing digital TV through the block of flats where I live, but if Sky were deliberately fudging cameras on some speakers and not others, that is reason enough to at least suggest they not be allowed to participate in debate broadcasts again. And yes, I may bring a slightly American view to how Murdoch operates his news and opinion broadcasters, but of course they'd call for US-style debates! It's just when Murdoch et al are so obviously gunning for Tories to get in, and get a new outlet to manifest that, that obligates the rest of us to scrutinize the way Sky covers it.
I have noticed a lot more BBC coverage of Tea Party people and Sarah Palin, despite the events being 10,000 angry blowhards in Crocs and therefore not representative of much at all.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Friday, 23 April 2010 11:12 (fifteen years ago)
Those things attract 10,000?!
― Ismael Klata, Friday, 23 April 2010 11:15 (fifteen years ago)
but of course they'd call for US-style debates
Absolutely. It was pretty grotesque the way they conducted the whole campaign tbh. Kept on badgering politicians, then, when there was every sign of them holding out against it, held an online poll (now these are hella right wing) which, surprise, surprise, everyone said we must have a tv leaders debate, how dare they not. Sky News then made it their headline that everyone wanted it (public 'fury' at being denied 'choice' etc), and how it was another example of politicians ignoring 'the people', started badgering politicians, made it into an ongoing campaign for 'democracy' (*spews*), and left no one with any choice.
Regardless of whether you think it's a good thing or not, the way it was conducted made it grotesquely clear that it was pretty much just an advertising stunt for Sky News. Still this is hardly something new, as unpalatable as it may look (sure I've seen stuff like this in newspaper campaigns in the early 20th C). It may not even really be that unpalatable, really - commercial nous in a tactical battle with political campaign tricks. Not edifying, but perhaps necessary.
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Friday, 23 April 2010 11:21 (fifteen years ago)
It's changed the campaign dynamic massively though - suddenly the debates are all that matter. I don't know that anyone anticipated that, so zings and tie colour matter hugely.
― Ismael Klata, Friday, 23 April 2010 11:25 (fifteen years ago)
My fantasy government would schedule a series of debates but pointedly not award one of the slots to Sky - we are all smart enough here to see what a managed story arc looks like so I can't imagine Westminster bods don't get it too.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Friday, 23 April 2010 11:27 (fifteen years ago)
I think it's been a positive development all in all and the Sky debate was better than the ITV debate fwiw. Much better.
― Matt DC, Friday, 23 April 2010 11:31 (fifteen years ago)
But yeah, they should all be on terrestrial TV.
Although it'll be digital only by the time the next election rolls round.
Was also syndicated to the bbc news channel which had a slightly less distracting ticker.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Friday, 23 April 2010 11:35 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, we watched it on BBC news, just seemed more appropriate somehow
― tomofthenest, Friday, 23 April 2010 11:36 (fifteen years ago)
Generally my house is a no-ITV zone because I'm not into light entertainment and I hate their news coverage (and I can't get a decent C5 signal even thought I live 300 meters from ITN). Am not getting a set-top converter because our block is in the middle of getting a digital link, but would never willingly pay for Sky.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Friday, 23 April 2010 11:45 (fifteen years ago)
Am intrigued to know what a 'digital link' is
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Friday, 23 April 2010 12:07 (fifteen years ago)
They're installing digital television, which for me will mean a new aerial socket. I still have a dead one here that says REDIFFUSION.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Friday, 23 April 2010 12:18 (fifteen years ago)
It's changed the campaign dynamic massively though - suddenly the debates are all that matter. I don't know that anyone anticipated that, so zings and tie colour matter hugely
The second leaders' debate had a live audience of 4.1 million viewers across Sky News, BBC News Channel and Sky3 last night
the importance may be a little overstated, at least for last night's 'debate' but the final one on bbc could be significant.....
― nakhchivan, Friday, 23 April 2010 12:21 (fifteen years ago)
the Sky debate was better than the ITV debate fwiw. Much better.
I disagree, it was boring in comparison. Admit that Boulton was far better than Alastair Stewart (that's not hard), apart from his attempt to help his mate Dave Cameron out but... questions about the fuggin' Pope??!?!?
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Friday, 23 April 2010 12:27 (fifteen years ago)
Daily Mail not taking any chanceshttp://refpls.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/daily_mail_vote.png?w=456&h=355
― Ned Trifle II, Friday, 23 April 2010 13:45 (fifteen years ago)
Can't wait for The Thick Of It debate episode.
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Friday, 23 April 2010 14:23 (fifteen years ago)
I'm still annoyed that Sky was given parity with terrestrial broadcasters in taking a turn televising the debates.― yes we kenya (suzy), Friday, April 23, 2010 11:28 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― yes we kenya (suzy), Friday, April 23, 2010 11:28 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
because of their editorial line, or because fewer people have access to it? if the latter, sky were obliged to provide the feed to all other channels (as will the bbc, itv were exempt from this req. for some reason), who could do what they want with it. bbc put it on news 24. it was on the guardian website too.
― caek, Friday, 23 April 2010 14:45 (fifteen years ago)
because of their editorial line
It does seem a bit off when the dude who runs the channel has four(?) national newspapers up Cameron's arse.
Clegg should have responded to Boulton's (fuckin divin cheatin cunty) Telegraph dig with "I believe I was on the front page of every Sky/Murdoch owned newspaper, they must consider me a threat."
― broad layering (onimo), Friday, 23 April 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)
So are the debates a positive or negative thing?
― textbook blows on the head (dowd), Friday, 23 April 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)
I go for positive, at least at the moment when they are new and interesting, ie engagement wirh novelty. Massive public focus on policy, what's similar and what's different between the parties. Yes, stage managed, but not necessarily according to party wishes. Probably brought the third party into the game more than possibly wd have been the case - a good thing imo.
Have to weigh against that the increased focus on what's telegenic - ie does it look good/youthful/tv presentery? (Although I'm not sure that's necessarily a helluva lot worse than trusting old, statesmanlike looking person.) also obv potential of becoming more about charisma than policy. Again, not actually sure that people aren't more savvy than this.
Yeah, good thing on the whole. Not ideal necessarily, but something of a relief from newspapery style of previous elections. Feels like it's bringing public engagement.
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Friday, 23 April 2010 18:40 (fifteen years ago)
Finally managed to watch the 2nd debate. Clegg getting a bit repetitive, Brown seemed to be more genuine, he pwns when it comes to talking economics. Could not believe Cameron, everything he was mocking were things the Tories are famous for doing above the other parties - scare tactics, bullshitting, etc.The question about 'what are you going to do to restore ppl's faith in politicians' - could have been a chance for Clegg to bring up the Murdoch thing and lay into the media? Or is that too risky?
― Not the real Village People, Saturday, 24 April 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)
Also: worth a read - Cameron's claims examinedhttp://www.badscience.net/2010/04/evidence-based-voting/
― Not the real Village People, Saturday, 24 April 2010 19:15 (fifteen years ago)
the editing and camerawork on the Sky debate were very much biased in favour of cameron. along with the examples above there was one point where cam and gordon clashed angrily, boulton calmed it down and told gordon to continue but the camera lingered on cameron seething and shaking his head in disgust while gordon chatted on off-camera. intention was clearly to get sympathy for cameron and portray brown as a waffling fool to be ignored. also noticed them screwing with the volume of gordon's mic, turning it lower than the others.
it really is just plain WRONG that they can get away with this shit. sky seem like a niche channel so i don't get why they're getting this chance to be pegged on the same level as bbc and itv, especially considering all the right-wing rags that live in the same bed.
one brilliantly backfiring thing to come out of it is that sky's constant haranguing for a tv debate (i guess they assumed supremeo spinbastard cameron would wallop brown, kennedy/nixon style) has given clegg a massive boost by giving him the exposure that the tabloids constantly and deliberately deny him. hilarious to see the explosion of lib dem hate come out of nowhere, i don't think joe public will fall for this transparently self-serving bullying.
don't think this article has been linked here yet: http://johannhari.com//2010/04/22/the-forces-that-have-been-blocking-british-democracy-are-becoming-visible-in-this-election?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Hari%20Social%20Media
― NI, Saturday, 24 April 2010 19:25 (fifteen years ago)
Johann Hari is tons better than his callow graduate incarnation! MUST READ.
My concern is that Sky is being aligned in a more corporate/evil direction - a slow massage into the British incarnation of Fox News.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Saturday, 24 April 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)
Why do Brits hate thinking and talking about Proportional Representation so much? why does Johann Hari apologise when introducing it? As well as the obvious fairness, PR elections are brilliant if you're an election junkie - tantric sex compared to a quick and unsatisfying knee-trembler: counts go on for days here in Ireland, and the whole nation waits on tenterhooks to see where the few hundred transfers of the Christian Solidarity candidate in Tipperary North will go.
― sonofstan, Saturday, 24 April 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7107300.ece
“I tie my hands in the following sense: that the party that has more votes and seats, but doesn’t get an absolute majority — I support them,” Clegg said.The biggest sticking point in any deal with the Conservatives will be electoral reform. Cameron yesterday refused to rule out discussing voting reform with the Lib Dems. The Tory leader is deeply resistant to changing the system, fearing proportional representation could prevent his party from ever again winning an outright majority ever again.Clegg made it clear that a shake-up of the voting system remained a top priority — saying Cameron would be making a “massive strategic error” if he insisted on defending the “clapped-out political system”.
The biggest sticking point in any deal with the Conservatives will be electoral reform. Cameron yesterday refused to rule out discussing voting reform with the Lib Dems. The Tory leader is deeply resistant to changing the system, fearing proportional representation could prevent his party from ever again winning an outright majority ever again.
Clegg made it clear that a shake-up of the voting system remained a top priority — saying Cameron would be making a “massive strategic error” if he insisted on defending the “clapped-out political system”.
electoral reform could certainly be a problem, but otherwise that's pretty unambiguous.
― caek, Sunday, 25 April 2010 08:07 (fifteen years ago)
It's only unambiguous if one of the big two parties gets most votes AND most seats. If the Tories get most votes, but Labour gets most seats it's not clear what he'd do.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Sunday, 25 April 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)
Party?
― Ned Raggett, Sunday, 25 April 2010 16:39 (fifteen years ago)
The more important question for Clegg is how many votes they would lose if the supported or went into coalition with the Tories - I would hazard that Labour and Lib Dem voters are more united in hating the Tories that any other permutation.
― sonofstan, Sunday, 25 April 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
I read his comments this morning as leaving open coalition with Labour only if he could be prime minister. I wonder if they'd go for it?
― Ismael Klata, Sunday, 25 April 2010 16:56 (fifteen years ago)
I mean it's unambiguous in the sense that he states precisely what he would do in a particular circumstance, not that he specifies what he will do in all possible circumstances.
― caek, Sunday, 25 April 2010 17:13 (fifteen years ago)
I think if they got PR out of it they could live with the ignominy for a parliament.
― caek, Sunday, 25 April 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)
I read his comments this morning as leaving open coalition with Labour only if he could be prime minister.
which comments?
― caek, Sunday, 25 April 2010 17:15 (fifteen years ago)
Speaking of the possibility that would leave Labour in third place, he told BBC One's Andrew Marr programme: "It is just preposterous the idea that if a party comes third in the number of votes, it still has somehow the right to carry on squatting in No 10. "A party which has come third - and so millions of people have decided to abandon them - has lost the election spectacularly (and) cannot then lay claim to providing the prime minister of this country."
The attraction for Labour - as well as remaining in government - would be that they'd have no alternative but to get rid of Brown.
― Ismael Klata, Sunday, 25 April 2010 17:29 (fifteen years ago)
Krishnan Guru-Murthy is HAMMERING Nick Griffin right now on C4. "So, how would you propose to repatriate *me*?"
― yes we kenya (suzy), Sunday, 25 April 2010 17:54 (fifteen years ago)
dammit cannot watch news on 4od.com
― went ham in a bad way (stevie), Sunday, 25 April 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)
Krishnan Guru-Murthy is HAMMERING Nick Griffin right now on C4.
Not good enough. Someone ought to be hammering Nick Griffin. With a big hammer.
― sonofstan, Sunday, 25 April 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)
or at least using the C4 to mine his car
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Sunday, 25 April 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)
I read his comments as "if you want PR you had better vote Labour!"
If Labour come third they're out of the (Clegg's) picture.
Cameron/Tories won't go for PR.
Therefore the only way the Lib Dems can get PR on the table is for Labour to gain enough votes to put them in a position to bargain.
He's painted himself into a corner in which if the Lib Dems have as successful an election as they've had in decades, and at Labour's expense, it'll guarantee the key policy that ensures a Lib Dem future at the top table will be dead.
― broad layering (onimo), Sunday, 25 April 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)
If he doesn't join a coalition then the minority government won't last more than a year or two, so dead is a bit strong.
― caek, Sunday, 25 April 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.channel4.com/news/ for that Griffin takedown.
― James Mitchell, Sunday, 25 April 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)
that's what i get too
would even labour (assuming they have a reasonably close showing) be prepared to concede substantially on electoral reform ('alternative voting' if not full pr)? the usual argument is that it hurts the conservatives the worst but labour could consign itself to a future of governing only in fractious coalitions with the libdems
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 25 April 2010 21:14 (fifteen years ago)
can I get that £50k to leave the country bnp cunthead? i'd be cool w/ that but unfortunately i'm a white british dude.
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Sunday, 25 April 2010 21:15 (fifteen years ago)
I think there are enough Labour MPs who cd stand the prospect of PR as an alternative to opposition. Alan Johnson's made conciliatory noises today and, whatever I think of his politics, he strikes me as a guy who's quite clear sighted on what needs to happen tactically.
― MC Cold Fusion (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 25 April 2010 21:33 (fifteen years ago)
They don't even have to sign up to PR iirc, but rather a referendum on PR, the outcome of which cd be God knows I reckon.
― MC Cold Fusion (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 25 April 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)
was having a bit of a crisis earlier wrt who to vote for etc. when i remember that i live in glasgow so it doesn't matter anyway.
― Jolyon Swagg (jim in glasgow), Sunday, 25 April 2010 21:40 (fifteen years ago)
the split within labour is depicted as realpolitik vs tribalism but yielding to the libdems on this for immediate advantage could have great and unforeseeable consequences (god knows as you says)
just hoping for anything that prevents dcameron from becoming pm and hopefully adminsters a coup de grace to the vermin at news international in the process....
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 25 April 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)
FWIW: Is PR actually good for the Lib Dems at this point? It's not like they'd magically keep even 20% of the popular vote - people don't vote Lib Dem because it's a *wasted vote* but they also *do* vote Lib Dem because it's less of a wasted vote than any other alternative to Labour/Tories...
― Gravel Puzzleworth, Sunday, 25 April 2010 21:44 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, my take on PR for the last 15 years or so has been that I can live with no more big majority Labour governments if it means no more big majority Tory governments.
― MC Cold Fusion (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 25 April 2010 21:44 (fifteen years ago)
FWIW: Is PR actually good for the Lib Dems at this point?
I think they could reasonably assume that if future results matched even their poorer General Elections in terms of voter numbers, then they wd have a lot more representation under PR.
― MC Cold Fusion (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 25 April 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)
can I get that £50k to leave the country bnp cunthead? i'd be cool w/ that but unfortunately i'm a white british dude.― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Sunday, 25 April 2010 16:15 (34 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Sunday, 25 April 2010 16:15 (34 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
I'm a bit jewish on my father's side and I already left, who should I call to get my cheque?
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Sunday, 25 April 2010 21:53 (fifteen years ago)
there are probably loads who would vote libdem but don't because they have no chance in their constituencies, i'd think their support would be ~20% at least in pr
it could instigate a long period of weak libdem/labour govts followed by some sort of deranged conservative/unionist/ukip hybrid
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 25 April 2010 21:55 (fifteen years ago)
With B&P holding the balance of power with their one seat in Stoke.
― Ned Trifle II, Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:02 (fifteen years ago)
they'd get far more than that in pr......
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:04 (fifteen years ago)
Seeing as the Conservatives aren't exactly well represented outside of England and the DUP don't seem like the greatest team players, I wouldn't be too concerned about a wingnut coalition any time soon.
― MC Cold Fusion (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:04 (fifteen years ago)
2017....
pm osbornesec of state rev paisley juniorsec of interior griffinchancellor lampardattorney gen farage
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:08 (fifteen years ago)
minister of transport rick rastardly
― MC Cold Fusion (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:10 (fifteen years ago)
jim, iirc glasgow north is in the top 50 lib dem target seats
― cozen, Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:11 (fifteen years ago)
okay, so Hull North isn't in the top 100 target seats so why are there orange posters everywhere telling me the Lib Dems are Winning Here?
― MC Cold Fusion (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:13 (fifteen years ago)
More importantly, does Channel 4's piss-take election night coverage look better than Dimbleby & co y/n?
― MC Cold Fusion (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:14 (fifteen years ago)
don't expect this'll help their chances in glasgow thohttp://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/apr/25/nick-clegg-coalition-conservatives
― cozen, Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:14 (fifteen years ago)
libs dems are winning here = magic everywhere in this bitch
― joe, Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:15 (fifteen years ago)
glasgow central yo.
― Jolyon Swagg (jim in glasgow), Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:17 (fifteen years ago)
"I was 15, it was under a very, very left wing conservative government..."
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)
nv;
http://www.oddschecker.com/specials/politics-and-election/hull-north/winning-party
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:22 (fifteen years ago)
have we done this yet? http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/04/labour-danger-uniform-swing.html
reason to believe it's worse than it looks for labour.
― joe, Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)
columba blango is also apparently winning here. would indeed be a joyous miracle if he could topple harriet harman who is 100-1 on to keep her seat.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)
I know, I'm just playing. Even the exotically named Lib Dem candidate Denis Healy's last leaflet had them trailing by 7 percent in presumably the best opinion poll they could stand up. "Lib Dems Winning Here" is poetic tho.
― MC Cold Fusion (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:27 (fifteen years ago)
~4% lab > libdem could happen
there might be a fair few london labour seats falling to libdems
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:32 (fifteen years ago)
I think "here" really does localise the "winning" to the residence in which this sign has been placed, unfortunately, but I like the tone of it as well.
Having also received a polling card at my dad's place I may instead vote in Somerton and frome which looks unnervingly close for comfort.
If the Tories get back in in the SW then it really is fucking over.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:39 (fifteen years ago)
Sorry, I made no sense there. What I meant was that if the LibDems can't hold the SW then we we've been all kidding ourselves this whole time.
Otoh, just heard Simon Hughes on the radio saying the LibDems won't work with Labour if they keep Gordon Brown but don't win the most votes. He also said that it's he couldn't imagine Labour could possibly replace Gordon Brown in the short space of time that they would need to to form a stable government after the election.
So that's that then.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Sunday, 25 April 2010 22:51 (fifteen years ago)
They can keep Gordon as party leader - they just don't need to nominate him as PM.
I really can't see what the Liberals are up to. Say nothing, except vote for us, and at least pretend you'll decide it on policy issues - no matter which of the other two parties they go into coalition with, that government will then represent the majority of voters - for perhaps the first time since 1945? - so i don't see what their issue is...
― sonofstan, Sunday, 25 April 2010 23:13 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, putatively aligning themselves w/tories seems like a misstep to me
― cozen, Sunday, 25 April 2010 23:23 (fifteen years ago)
Vote Tory, Get Location, Location, Location
― James Mitchell, Monday, 26 April 2010 05:14 (fifteen years ago)
that makes me so fucking angry
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 26 April 2010 07:31 (fifteen years ago)
is she aiming for some UK palin ish?
― went ham in a bad way (stevie), Monday, 26 April 2010 07:40 (fifteen years ago)
haha see also: "Carol Vorderman, the former host of Countdown, is to head a Conservative Party task force analysing the teaching of mathematics across Britain."
― pollos da don (tpp), Monday, 26 April 2010 07:54 (fifteen years ago)
More amusing than Brian Eno being the Libdem's Youth Advisor.
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 26 April 2010 08:10 (fifteen years ago)
Otoh, just heard Simon Hughes on the radio saying the LibDems won't work with Labour if they keep Gordon Brown but don't win the most votes. He also said that it's he couldn't imagine Labour could possibly replace Gordon Brown in the short space of time that they would need to to form a stable government after the election.So that's that then.
Not sure. Labour seem all fired up and ready to go when it comes to self-decapitation after the election.
Say nothing, except vote for us, and at least pretend you'll decide it on policy issues - no matter which of the other two parties they go into coalition with, that government will then represent the majority of voters - for perhaps the first time since 1945? - so i don't see what their issue is...
Yeah. I think they've left themselves wiggle room, but I'm not really sure what the point of these statements about coalitions is.
― caek, Monday, 26 April 2010 08:51 (fifteen years ago)
Purely to countermine Cameron's "Vote Lib Dem, Get Brown" strategy.
― MC Cold Fusion (Noodle Vague), Monday, 26 April 2010 08:53 (fifteen years ago)
Labour have a massive incentive to be part of the governing coalition, not just to remain in power, but because of the potential conservative lols if they are not, so I would expect them to make themselves a v. easy lay for the lib dems (clegg's conditions re: MPs/vote notwithstanding)
― caek, Monday, 26 April 2010 08:53 (fifteen years ago)
Purely to countermine Cameron's "Vote Lib Dem, Get Brown" strategy.― MC Cold Fusion (Noodle Vague), Monday, April 26, 2010 9:53 AM (17 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― MC Cold Fusion (Noodle Vague), Monday, April 26, 2010 9:53 AM (17 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Yeah, I guess. I suppose they're worried about exposing their right flank in the SW, etc. Seems unnecessarily cautious.
― caek, Monday, 26 April 2010 08:54 (fifteen years ago)
Given that the polls are so tight I think an element of caution is understandable this go round. I'm sure Clegg and all his tacticians are aware that these kind of poll ratings have evaporated into the same number of seats before now.
― MC Cold Fusion (Noodle Vague), Monday, 26 April 2010 08:55 (fifteen years ago)
Major LOLs at Tory press conference - "If you want a Liberal liberal government vote for the Conservatives". The phrase "Modern Conservative Party" reaching Nu Labour levels of proliferation.
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Monday, 26 April 2010 09:13 (fifteen years ago)
Home secretary MegatronForeign secretary ravenous tiger
― Matt DC, Monday, 26 April 2010 09:38 (fifteen years ago)
The phrase "Modern Conservative Party" reaching Nu Labour levels of proliferation.
seems to be selectively applied while responding to allegations of homophobia, xenophobia, etc, i think.
― Earning your Masters in Library and Information Science is beautiful (schlump), Monday, 26 April 2010 10:32 (fifteen years ago)
Kofi Kingston is urging each member of the WWE Universe in the UK to SmackDown their vote btw. Could have a big impact I reckon.
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Monday, 26 April 2010 10:35 (fifteen years ago)
― James Mitchell, Monday, April 26, 2010 6:14 AM (5 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Ismael Klata, Monday, April 26, 2010 8:31 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark
yeah.... labour connived in the operation of an international network of torture cells.
i guess the tories would have tortured 'em *even worse* though.
― history mayne, Monday, 26 April 2010 10:44 (fifteen years ago)
Well their heroine is the "Iron Maiden" after all
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Monday, 26 April 2010 10:45 (fifteen years ago)
Kirstie Allsop 'would accept a peerage' but "hasn't discussed it w/ Cameron" and "would be a maverick"...
So, she's purely guessing that she's getting one for no apparent reason apart from she's 'one of him'... ?
― Mark G, Monday, 26 April 2010 10:52 (fifteen years ago)
ehhh
i started the gd thread on how kirstie and the awful phil were long-term harbingers of the new right, but y'know, all governments ennoble total cuntwits. this one certainly has. baron fucking michael martin!!!!! just for instance. so no bigs rly.
― history mayne, Monday, 26 April 2010 10:56 (fifteen years ago)
Errrrrrrrr, aren't ex-Speakers are always ennobled? And then there's... Lord Mandelson...
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Monday, 26 April 2010 11:00 (fifteen years ago)
lord ashcroft
― history mayne, Monday, 26 April 2010 11:02 (fifteen years ago)
This country
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Monday, 26 April 2010 11:03 (fifteen years ago)
lord truscott: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/21/lords
― history mayne, Monday, 26 April 2010 11:04 (fifteen years ago)
The Hon. Kirstie Allsop not lacking in titles imo.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Monday, 26 April 2010 11:04 (fifteen years ago)
Baroness Allsop sounds bit too close to Baron Hardup imo
― Is that your Ayrshire bacon? (Tom D.), Monday, 26 April 2010 11:09 (fifteen years ago)
“It is my job to see that Cameron fucking well gets into Downing Street,” proclaimed Tom Newton Dunn, political editor of the Sun
― Matt DC, Monday, 26 April 2010 11:39 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe she's basing it on this?
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 26 April 2010 12:55 (fifteen years ago)
Hmm...
7. Ann Widdecombe - A reward for years of service in the Commons and also a symbol to the right wing of the Conservative Party that David Cameron has not forgotten that they helped his rise to the leadership.
DC: "Hey, Thanks, right wing!"
― Mark G, Monday, 26 April 2010 13:00 (fifteen years ago)
Allsop "has already been advising the Conservatives on housing matters"??? Perhaps they can get Fred Goodwin in to advise on banking matters.
― Zelda Zonk, Monday, 26 April 2010 13:05 (fifteen years ago)
http://imgur.com/yLbE4.jpg
― James Mitchell, Monday, 26 April 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)
I was just coming here to post that. Has he learned nothing from The Thick of It?
― Matt DC, Monday, 26 April 2010 14:17 (fifteen years ago)
lol @ thought bubble. Is Carrie his new nickname?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/apr/23/david-cameron-paxman-squeeze
Labour need to swarm all over this. His position (based on what he said to Paxman plus the manifesto map basically writing off NI and north-east England as worthless) is that he'll cut spending where it's needed most. I'm sure he won't lose any sleep over a vote lost in a constituency he won't win anyway but imo he's given Labour a pretty useful Big Scare story to sit alongside the Tax Breaks For Millionaires thing.
― broad layering (onimo), Monday, 26 April 2010 14:25 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not sure how cutting the state in NI and the North East is supposed to magically make the private sector create employement there.
― Matt DC, Monday, 26 April 2010 14:32 (fifteen years ago)
(from memory) when he was pushed by Paxman I think he realised he was going to catch himself out listing huge areas for the chop (along with a big DON'T VOTE TORY message) so he sidetracked it onto "building the private sector" and didn't mention another area by name.
Paxman uncharacteristically failed in his usual dog-after-a-bone thing and allowed Cameron to waffle away.
― broad layering (onimo), Monday, 26 April 2010 14:36 (fifteen years ago)
Cameron accuses Clegg of holding country to ransom
Snivelly, self-serving, entitled little prick.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:12 (fifteen years ago)
Is that what he said? Blimey, pot kettle or wot?
― Mark G, Monday, 26 April 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)
Norman Tebitt - 'this is how Nazi Germany started...'
― Matt DC, Monday, 26 April 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)
Andrew Sullivan agrees with Cameron, fwiw
I like clear, strong governments with clear mandates that can be held accountable at elections. My hope is that the Liberal Democrats will slowly overtake Labour - as Labour overtook the Liberals in the early part of the twentieth century. At that point, Labour becomes the third party (yay!) and Britain can oscillate between a Whiggish Toryish and a Tory Whiggism.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)
See how nobody has any idea how the swing is going to play out in terms of actual seats, because nobody's polling on a constituency or regional basis - why not?
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 26 April 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)
norman tebbit otm
― history mayne, Monday, 26 April 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)
ismael also otm
what are the bookies basing their constituency level odds on? the results of the last election?
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)
I've been keeping an eye on a couple of constituencies and the odds haven't changed all campaign, so I guess it's the historical vote
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 26 April 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)
anyone done a picture of Britain with a noose around the Scottish border yet?
― mdskltr (blueski), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)
what are the bookies basing their constituency level odds on? the results of the last election?― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Monday, 26 April 2010 11:26 (31 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Monday, 26 April 2010 11:26 (31 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
the way the money is flowing
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)
Trust Tebbit to know a lot about fascism...
― Check this, in fact. How exciting. He literally cuts the mustard. (snoball), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:02 (fifteen years ago)
also, handy use of racial slur, tebbs. never change.
― tomofthenest, Monday, 26 April 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)
PR indicted because it brought Hitler to power, against all the countries in the world where it hasn't been the slippery slope to Fascism.....pretty much of the order of 'milk as gateway drug to heroin' argument that one.
― sonofstan, Monday, 26 April 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)
Germany, in particular, has conspicuously failed to elect Hitler for a second term. It gives italy multiple doses of Berlusconi, though.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)
Tebbit's argument is essentially "the people can't be trusted", however the alternative seems to be trusting people like him.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:15 (fifteen years ago)
PR is str8 bullshit, hitler or no hitler
have to put up with BNP and other assorted weirdos (scots nationalists, greens, lib dems... i kid, i kid) getting leverage
i guess the idea of pols "working together" appeals to some people, and there's an idea abroad that PR is democratic, but the reality will be about as undemocratic as it gets
this, and the comments, are super depressing:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/25/what-about-the-financial-crisis?showallcomments=true#start-of-comments
― history mayne, Monday, 26 April 2010 17:21 (fifteen years ago)
See how nobody has any idea how the swing is going to play out in terms of actual seats, because nobody's polling on a constituency or regional basis - why not?― Ismael Klata, Monday, April 26, 2010 5:23 PM (55 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Ismael Klata, Monday, April 26, 2010 5:23 PM (55 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Most constituencies aren't being polled on a targeted basis because it's pretty much inconceivable that most constituencies are going to change hands. There are polls of the marginals about, e.g. this yesterday: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7107265.ece. And there were regional polls yesterday too: http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2640.
They don't get reported on TV because they're too complicated. And they don't happen every day because they're spectacularly expensive.
― caek, Monday, 26 April 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)
Also, what they measure may be more useful than national polls, but they make that measurement less accurately because of sample size.
― caek, Monday, 26 April 2010 17:27 (fifteen years ago)
I am all for representative democracy, but you have to have better ties to the community that to the party, power of recall, possibly multiple members, proportionally elected in a multi member constituency. Problem with that is you then get America.
given that MPs are so tightly controlled by the party you might as well dole out representatives on party lines.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:29 (fifteen years ago)
PR is str8 bullshit, hitler or no hitlerhave to put up with BNP and other assorted weirdos (scots nationalists, greens, lib dems... i kid, i kid) getting leveragei guess the idea of pols "working together" appeals to some people, and there's an idea abroad that PR is democratic, but the reality will be about as undemocratic as it gets
I know that when I was in Italy they had introduced some kind of floor (maybe 4% or 5%?) below which a party couldn't get representation. If you set this floor high enough, it would prevent governments being held to ransom by fringe parties.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, April 26, 2010 6:29 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
well, yeah. but i like the idea of an mp representing a constituency, even though it's already basically a fantasy and the upper ranks of both parties are cut from the same poxbridge/westminster/legal cloth and parachuted in.
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:46 (fifteen years ago)
You could have a mixture (like they have in some countries). Have 300 MPs elected on a constituency basis (with constituenices roughly double their current size) and another 300 chosen from party lists on a PR basis. People would vote twice: once for their local MP and once for their preferred party.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:53 (fifteen years ago)
that's your two houses sorted then.
― tomofthenest, Monday, 26 April 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)
of parliament, I mean. Not trying to imply you're abusing the second home allowance.
― tomofthenest, Monday, 26 April 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)
Oh no. The second house should be done on a heriditary basis and topped up with people who buy their way in.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Monday, 26 April 2010 19:09 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.latimes.com/media/photo/2010-04/53464043.jpg
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 10:48 (fifteen years ago)
A red rose?
― Ned Trifle (Notinmyname), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 10:59 (fifteen years ago)
quite a small rose, or a 'rosette'.
― broad layering (onimo), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:03 (fifteen years ago)
Unlike Cameron to be seen out in a suit and tie, what will the kidz think innit
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:06 (fifteen years ago)
weird, just got leaflets from about six different parties (every1 except the tories i think) through the door simultaneously
it makes sense to club together and hire delivery boys i spose
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:08 (fifteen years ago)
UH TOP HAT xpost
― yes we kenya (suzy), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:09 (fifteen years ago)
weird, just got leaflets from about six different parties (every1 except the tories i think) through the door simultaneouslyit makes sense to club together and hire delivery boys i spose
Wasn't it the postman?
― broad layering (onimo), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:09 (fifteen years ago)
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:10 (fifteen years ago)
Anti-Tory coalition in operation
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:10 (fifteen years ago)
lol, but no
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:11 (fifteen years ago)
WERE YOU BORN IN A BARN?
As any well educated gentleman knows a red rose is the traditional buttonhole for St George's day.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:15 (fifteen years ago)
St George's Day was last week, no?
(spose the photo could have been last week too but didn't think the Internet was ever that slow)
― broad layering (onimo), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:19 (fifteen years ago)
read buttonhole as butthole.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:20 (fifteen years ago)
I think Ed was showing repeats.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:21 (fifteen years ago)
true patriots wear asparagus:
http://www.worcesternews.co.uk/news/local/8112587.We_don___t_want_red_rose_to_be_symbol_of_St_George/
― joe, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:21 (fifteen years ago)
The Liberal Democrat leader was forced to clarify his position yesterday, saying that he would potentially enter negotiations with Labour in a hung Parliament even if it did come third — so long as it ditched Gordon Brown as leader.
.......He said: “I think, if Labour do come third in terms of the number of votes cast, then people would find it inexplicable that Gordon Brown himself could carry on as Prime Minister, which is what the old convention would dictate.”
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7108965.ece
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:23 (fifteen years ago)
Internet not that slow, but folk music promoters are, apparently Boris and Cameron 'hijacked' their free Leadenhall Market St Georges Day concert. Photo appeared 2 days ago in the LA Times.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:27 (fifteen years ago)
what a mess. most lib dem voters ime have been disaffected labour voters rather than mild tories -- they are "to the left" of the tories on identity politics, war policy, etc. a lib dem-tory coalition sounds impossible to me. but apparently elsewhere in the country the lib dems present a different face kind of thing.
i don't think nick clegg has the stuff, frankly, and the idea of him holding high office... yikes.
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:29 (fifteen years ago)
Beginning to come round to the "fuck this guy" way of thinking. It's likely he'll have 1/3 of the seats of either main party and this king maker in waiting shit is pissing me off.
He's essentially admitting that Lid Dem policy and how it aligns with either of the big two is completely irrelevant to any coalition decision and it's all be down to who finishes in what position. This essentially means if the Tories suddenly went full on overtly right wing and stole enough B&P & UKIP votes he would be happier to join them than a centrist Labour holding out a PR carrot.
― broad layering (onimo), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:31 (fifteen years ago)
essentially
That's the Liberals for you. This hung parliament stuff is giving me a headache.
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:32 (fifteen years ago)
It's all politicking though. Let's see what happens if there really is a hung parliament. IIRC, at first Clegg didn't want to talk about hung parliaments at all, even though journalists always brought it up. With the Lib surge, I guess he feels he has to address it, but it hasn't done him any favours.
(My gut feeling is that there won't be a hung parliament anyway, that the Lib support is softer than it looks in the polls, and that the Tories will scrape through with an absolute majority.)
― Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:36 (fifteen years ago)
kingmaker in waiting: it's not his fault a party with 1/3 of the seats (and an almost identical share of the popular vote btw) has lots of influence in a fptp system in which the other two parties despise each other.
i think he's been v. foolish to give any parameters for coalition negotiations at all though.
― caek, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:37 (fifteen years ago)
otm. but people will keep fuckin' asking him about it.
By the by apparently this is the Clegg equivalent of Cameron's Bullingdon club picture:http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/26/article-1268979-09503B3A000005DC-749_634x467.jpgEvery inch the public schoolboy: Nick Clegg, now the Lib Dem leader, with fellow pupils at Westminster in 1984
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:38 (fifteen years ago)
My gut feeling is that there won't be a hung parliament anyway, that the Lib support is softer than it looks in the polls, and that the Tories will scrape through with an absolute majority
This seems obvious to me
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:39 (fifteen years ago)
i presume his statements this week have been made primarily to maximize the lib dem vote, which is not an entirely unreasonable goal. it's not like he's ralph nader wrecking things for labour.
― caek, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:40 (fifteen years ago)
Every inch the public schoolboy
Eh?
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:40 (fifteen years ago)
^ Oh, this'll be some right wing rag's doing then?
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:41 (fifteen years ago)
Oh come on, they're not even in proper tennis whites. Then, and only then, would the photo look even one tenth the smugfest that is the Bullingdon portrait. Nice to know lopsided comparisons presented as equal happens in RW media here too.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:44 (fifteen years ago)
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:45 (fifteen years ago)
I'm calling it Daily Mail without even checking the url.
― broad layering (onimo), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:45 (fifteen years ago)
/My gut feeling is that there won't be a hung parliament anyway, that the Lib support is softer than it looks in the polls, and that the Tories will scrape through with an absolute majority/This seems obvious to me
Yeah, this totally. I still don't think it's a bad election to lose tbh, although the stakes for the lib-dems have suddenly become v high as a weaker-than-expected showing wd be destructive I think.
Agree with others who see a mis-step with this public aligning/king making - I got a feeling that this, vague as it is, is more like to drive people to the Tories and Lab.
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:46 (fifteen years ago)
that could be determined from their shitty gfx, circling him as if he doesn't look more or less the same as now and in any case none of the others resemble him xp
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:46 (fifteen years ago)
Is that Dunlop Green Flash?
― broad layering (onimo), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:47 (fifteen years ago)
Also in composition terms, the pic actually makes Clegg look leaderish while still a schoolboy, whereas Cameron in the Bullingdon pic looks like some random of the officer class.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:47 (fifteen years ago)
i don't think there will be an absolute tory majority, but the lib dem surge does feel like a lot of hot air. i didn't think clegg actually did anything special in either debate and his personal appeal is lost on me; as for his policies, i wonder if the poll respondents even know what they are other than the made-up "£100bn" trident thing. that said, they do seem a bit more proactive about financial regulation. tory and labour politics is based on britain still being one of the big clubs -- i.e. having a real nuclear deterrent and a balla financial centre. not so much for the lib dems. not sure where yer average voter stands on that score, what the implications will be of losing it, etc.
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:49 (fifteen years ago)
in my mental image of the mid 80s everyone had floppy hair, white trainers and short white tennis shorts anyway
this may not be true but I don't want to be dissuaded
― a subplot excised from Latawnya the Naughty Horse (a passing spacecadet), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:49 (fifteen years ago)
nick LEG amirite??
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:50 (fifteen years ago)
hotcha!!
Just glad it wasn't a badminton court: floppy hair, white trainers and shuttlecock down front of short white tennis shorts a la Wham
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:52 (fifteen years ago)
Nick Clegg is thriving as the party leader least tainted by spin and most associated with political change. But many voters are sceptical of his ability to lead a government and see voting Lib Dem as a protest against the other parties.
Overall, 58% agree with the statement "the Liberal Democrats represent something new and different", against 37% who disagree. That includes 56% of current Labour supporters and 39% of Conservatives.
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:54 (fifteen years ago)
super lazy qn: but is there an infographic or word-collage or blipvert that explains where the lib dems are going to win new seats?
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:56 (fifteen years ago)
i wonder if the poll respondents even know what they are other than the made-up "£100bn" trident thing. ― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:49 (3 minutes ago) Bookmark
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:49 (3 minutes ago) Bookmark
tbh they lost me when this went from abandoning the myth of an independent nuclear deterrent to "holding a review" and "considering alternatives", but then I'm just a beardy hippy.
― tomofthenest, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:56 (fifteen years ago)
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/liberal-democrat-target-seats
― joe, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:58 (fifteen years ago)
excellent, thank you
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 11:59 (fifteen years ago)
Yes, shame about Emily Thornberry, MP in my neighbouring constituency, she seems OK
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:00 (fifteen years ago)
Interesting report on somewhere or other last night said that current predictions in Lib-Dem vs Tory marginals is for a 8-12 seat Lib-Dem gain - meaning the Tories would need an even bigger swing from Labour than they initially targeted to have an overall majority.
― broad layering (onimo), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:02 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, this is the nub of why lib dem success is worse the opposition than the incumbent
― caek, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:05 (fifteen years ago)
I've met Emily Thornberry, when she was Labour candidate in Canterbury she drove me to interview Chris Smith in some pub somewhere. Seemed nice enough.
I'm not sure I agree with that John Lanchester article upthread - yes they should be a lot firmer about what they are planning to cut and when but at the same time I want to know what they are planning to do to return the UK to something above piddling 0.2% growth first. Proper growth in the economy will reduce the deficit anyway, then they can talk about cuts. Anything else is ducking the issue. Its one thing banging on about spending cuts but there's a reason why the Tories have made the budget deficit the central issue and not, say, restructuring the economy or regulating the financial sector, and it's nothing to do with their relative importance.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:06 (fifteen years ago)
Worse for the Tories as opposed to "the opposition", you mean?
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:07 (fifteen years ago)
so do y'all think I should bother to take the day off work and vote for David Heath (good guy by all accounts) in Somerton and Frome (number two on the tory targets list) or just vote in Camberwell and Peckham where it'll make sod all difference?
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:07 (fifteen years ago)
Former
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:08 (fifteen years ago)
I think caek dropped a 'for'.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:09 (fifteen years ago)
yeah i agree with that, and only labour can credibly argue for more state intervention to help the real economy... but as per ush, what have they been doing the last 13 years? and it is still true that there is going to be a sterling crisis unless something is done, cuts-wise. it sucks but hey that's capitalism.
xpost to matt dc
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:09 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, sorry, "the opposition" = con. the point is an ascendant third party is generally worse news for an opposition party with a shot at a majority than it is for an incumbent.
― caek, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:09 (fifteen years ago)
Nick Clegg backpedalling now?http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8644770.stm
― Ned Trifle (Notinmyname), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:26 (fifteen years ago)
Clegg must be so shit at poker.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:27 (fifteen years ago)
Meanwhile Peppa Pig distances herself from Brown
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:28 (fifteen years ago)
The pig really does look like Mandelson there.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:28 (fifteen years ago)
Mandy with the LOLz: "It's all far, far too political for me to understand."
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:29 (fifteen years ago)
A spokesman for Gordon Brown said the prime minister and his family were "big fans" of Peppa Pig. "He understands that she has a very busy schedule and so couldn't make it."
"He understands that she has a very busy schedule and so couldn't make it."
Nice he's been kept in the loop. The muddy puddles will go unsplashed...
― Mark G, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:34 (fifteen years ago)
Sorry about your brother and all that but it's yet another Cockney Wanker
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:35 (fifteen years ago)
Ex-EastEnders actress Brooke Kinsella, whose brother was stabbed to death, has backed the Tories on crime, saying they would "make our streets safe again".
haha synchronicity ^^
still a bit aaht uv owda to diss her rather than the cunts who put 'victims' families' up to this shit
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:40 (fifteen years ago)
Violence against people had risen, drug offences were up 70% and there were 10,000 incidents of anti-social behaviour every day, while one in six children grew up in a home where nobody worked, and the poor were getting poorer, he said."These are astonishing statistics," he said.
"These are astonishing statistics," he said.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:45 (fifteen years ago)
one in six children grew up in a home where nobody worked
Astonishing that this accounts for 16.6% of the child population - every day!
still, it'd be worse under the tories.
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:49 (fifteen years ago)
Well established fact that not having a job makes you go out and stab people.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
well, tbh, most people *do* link crime and poverty, if not quite so directly; either way, though, i'd have thought that that is an appalling statistic.
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:54 (fifteen years ago)
http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs09/hosb1109vol1.pdf
2008-2009 statistics for England & Wales vs 2007-2008
POLICE RECORDED CRIME↓ All police recorded crime down 5% to 4.7 million crimes↓ Violence against the person down 6%↓ with injury down 7% ↑ Domestic burglary up 1% ↓ Offences against vehicles down 10%↓ Theft from the person down 12%↓ Criminal damage down 10%↓ Robbery down 5%↑ Drugs offences up 6%
HOW HAVE LEVELS OF CRIME CHANGED OVER THE LONGER TERM?Long-term trends show that BCS crime rose steadily from 1981 through to theearly 1990s, peaking in 1995. Crime then fell, making 1995 a significantturning point. The fall was substantial until 2004/05. Since then, BCS crimehas shown little overall change with the exception of a statistically significantreduction of 10 per cent in 2007/08 (the lowest ever level since the first resultsin 1981). The apparent increase of five per cent in BCS crime this year is notstatistically significant. Trends in BCS violence, vehicle-related theft andburglary broadly reflect the trend in all BCS crime.
― broad layering (onimo), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:57 (fifteen years ago)
xpost they've botched the figures, it's more like one in eight in truth, but still worryingly high.
― joe, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:58 (fifteen years ago)
http://i41.tinypic.com/mj7sxd.jpg
― broad layering (onimo), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:59 (fifteen years ago)
Since 1995: Down 49% - All BCS violence
― broad layering (onimo), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:01 (fifteen years ago)
Classy.
This 'statistic' is surely bollocks? They can't be talking nationwide?
Are you being sarcastic here? Serious question, I can't tell any more.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:02 (fifteen years ago)
i think with statistics, you should accept all or none of them. to pick and choose demonstrates obvious bias.
i *do* think it would have been worse under the tories, but not to the extent that i'm going to lie about what a shower of cunts labour has been, over and over again. so "it'd be worse under the tories" is literally *all* you can say in its favour, hence my repeated use of it.
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:07 (fifteen years ago)
are you talking about these statistics, or is that your attitude to statistics in general? they are not all equal.
― caek, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:09 (fifteen years ago)
I think he means that most people are completely ignorant about which stats are real and which ones aren't and simply choosing the ones that are being trotted out by the people you want to believe demonstrates bias. Still want to know where this "one in six" stat came from though.
Perhaps an incoming Conservative government could pledge to make it illegal to stab teenagers and leave them dying in the streets?
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:12 (fifteen years ago)
that seems like a rather unambitious attitude towards facts.
― caek, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:14 (fifteen years ago)
Rod Morgan, Professor Emeritus of Criminology at the University of Bristol on the idea that Britain is more dangerous than before Labour came into power: "that position is not defensible. All the evidence suggests that volume crime, including violent crime, is significantly down."
― the big pink suede panda bear hurts (ledge), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:15 (fifteen years ago)
Rod Morgan may well be right, but given that we don't know to what extent those recorded crime figures are being massaged I'd say 'facts' is stretching it slightly. Also "recorded crime" and "crime" are not the same thing.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:16 (fifteen years ago)
matt - it's probably from a national audit office report a couple of years ago which said one in six households had no one working. but not all of them have children: 1.7m children live in jobless households, which with about 13m kids in the uk as a whole, makes the real figure just over 1 in 8.
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23404923-six-million-britons-are-living-in-households-where-nobody-works.do
― joe, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:18 (fifteen years ago)
(xp) well you can only meaningfully speak of such things as "recorded crime" or "reported crime". or "reported fear of crime".
― the big pink suede panda bear hurts (ledge), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)
people don't vote on the stats but on their experience (or, if you like, their "perception", which is of course wrong, if they only understood). so i mean, my household has been victim of four instances of property crime in the last six weeks, and there is more vandalism in the neighbourhood than, say, three years ago. there just is more crime in a recession, and it was similar twenty years ago.
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)
xxp And that NAO report is based on Labour Force Survey data from 1999-2000.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:22 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not saying any of the statistics quoted on this thread are "facts", but meaningful numbers would be useful. "evidence-based" policy (total bullshit ben goldacre term) is not going to solve everything, but just because it's complicated and people disagree about it, you don't give up and throw the whole field of statistics out. that's what i get from something like "i think with statistics, you should accept all or none of them. to pick and choose demonstrates obvious bias".
― caek, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)
The recorded crime figures actually show an *increase*, due to a change in recording some time in the 90s iirc, but linking the figures pre and post the change is a big no-no because they're measuring different things. The figures which show a decrease are the BCS which is basically a measure of people's perception of crime.
― the big pink suede panda bear hurts (ledge), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:24 (fifteen years ago)
sorry for dreadful plural singular mashup
― the big pink suede panda bear hurts (ledge), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:25 (fifteen years ago)
xp2me, to say one stat is a good example of inductive quantitative reasoning, and a contradictory stat is flawed does not necessarily demonstrate bias.
― caek, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:26 (fifteen years ago)
just because it's complicated and people disagree about it, you don't give up and throw the whole field of statistics out. that's what i get from something like "i think with statistics, you should accept all or none of them. to pick and choose demonstrates obvious bias".
― caek, Tuesday, April 27, 2010 2:23 PM (59 seconds ago) Bookmark
im pissing about a bit, but "crime down since 1995", if you believe it, still isn't a political argument unless you can say what policy it was that caused crime to go down over that time. i heard gordon brown about an hour ago, defending his sound economic husbandry cough, saying that there were a million new homeowners since 1997. and what the fuck does that mean, and is it even a good thing? i guess it might be "true". but imo politicians should debate principles, policies, etc, rather than reel off statistics.
famous example: crack-related homicides in the US sort of went off a cliff in the early 1990s, and i don't think ne1 knows *why*.
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:29 (fifteen years ago)
Clearly there's a correlation between the Labour Party abandoning unique principles and policies and Cabinet ministers increasing their use of statistics.
― Sub/Doms Whipping Here (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:33 (fifteen years ago)
One day there will be a fantastic book about the rise of "evidence-based" public policy but damn if my head is too woozy to pick at that scab right now.
― Sub/Doms Whipping Here (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:34 (fifteen years ago)
ben goldacre has a lot to answer for.
― caek, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:36 (fifteen years ago)
agreed that stats should be used to back up policies, but the problem here is not labour saying "crime is down", it's the tories saying "crime is up, broon oot noo!" when all the statistics suggest otherwise.
― the big pink suede panda bear hurts (ledge), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:36 (fifteen years ago)
I'm just shocked that *perception of crime* is down, even with all the Broeken Britian scaremongering.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:38 (fifteen years ago)
I was thinking not just of Ben Goldacre's steez, but a whole thing that's happened across the public and voluntary sectors over the last 20 years+ in which the only "outcomes" that matter - and therefore get funded - are the outcomes that can be measured via the tick-box. Teaching being one of the more obvious and stupid examples.
― Sub/Doms Whipping Here (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:39 (fifteen years ago)
the police used to say that the early 2000s rise in crime was due to increased mobile phone ownership, people losing them and then filing fradulent reports that they had been stolen for insurance claims. once they stopped just handing out crime numbers without asking questions, the number of "street robberies" dropped. then we started worrying about anti-social behavior instead.
― joe, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:41 (fifteen years ago)
xp, i get into arguments with people at work who are obsessed with the idea that the scientific method will solve everything in society. all of them are voting lib dem fwiw.
― caek, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 13:49 (fifteen years ago)
Yes, sorry about that, that was a bit below the belt *shame-faced*
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)
From the BKinsella BBC link:
Mr Cameron said he would not pretend that the "broken society" had been created under Labour,
Where's that owl?
― Mark G, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)
You mean the 'owl of disbelief that went up when he said that?
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 14:15 (fifteen years ago)
More Modern Conservatism
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:09 (fifteen years ago)
Mr Gardener has been suspended for not saying it quietly enough...
― Mark G, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)
Mr Lardner was reinstated to the party in 2008 after a previous suspension over claims he made racist comments.
The primary school teacher was alleged to have portrayed former leader of white-rule Rhodesia, Ian Smith, as a hero.
On that occasion, Mr Lardner did not deny making the comments but suggested they had been taken out of context.
Genius fucking move selecting him as a candidate for, well, anywhere really.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)
I suppose bit like that Labour guy in Moray, no chance of them winning so any arsehole can stand
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:24 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.economist.com/blogs/bagehot/2010/04/where_are_cuts : /
― caek, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)
Institute for Fiscal Parties says none of the parties have a fucking clue about where they're gonna cut spending.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:56 (fifteen years ago)
Through the collusion of almost all the main players, what ought to have been the dominating issue of this campaign has scarcely got a look in
It's a decent point.
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)
IFS is not v partisan iirc, so it's interesting to see how critical it is of the tory plan
do wonder how the debate on thursday will address the question of cuts
feel kinda like maybe, having bailed out the banking sector, the banking sector should chip in a little bit
people whose pay is cut by the govt will still have to be paying the vig on their house etc., to the bailed out banks
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
Formally Cameron and Brown have a free hand in negotiations, Clegg does not. The Southport Resolution in the Lib Dem rules requires him to get the support of 75% of the Parliamentary Liberal Democrat party, and 75% of the party’s Federal executive (and failing that the support of two-thirds of the wider party) in order to enter into any agreement that “could affect the party’s independence of political action” – taken as meaning a coalition agreement. While all the leaders would in practice need to take their parties with them, only Clegg would have such a formal process to deal with somehow.
a lib-con coalition that cameron found acceptable and 75% of the LDs supported does not sound easy.
― caek, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)
(from http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2645)
im back on not voting now, only hours after telling a liberal canvasser it might be her night
forgot they wanted the euro
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 19:25 (fifteen years ago)
do we have a thread to argue about british constitutional reform? its lurking around here but maybe a discussion wld disrupt the Election Narrative
― ogmor, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)
oh yeah that's the other reason im backing away
― Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 19:30 (fifteen years ago)
Saw Galloway riding his campaign bus through the wrong fucking constituency *again* this evening and was sorely tempted to shout back at the fucker.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 19:39 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah right, like the Euro is even remotely an issue any more.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 20:47 (fifteen years ago)
think plenty of people are bored and just want to throw the dice a little bit. not sure any of the actual policies or their risks and implications have much bearing.
― tomofthenest, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 20:51 (fifteen years ago)
― Matt DC, Tuesday, April 27, 2010 9:47 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark
heard their business spokesperson earlier saying they were still into it, just not now
ie when we're passed the five tests
obvi i don't think it's likely; but it is indicative of their general bearing
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 20:54 (fifteen years ago)
lolling at the tories' Hung Parliament Party gambit on bbc now.
― tomofthenest, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)
6 Apr 18 Apr 22 Apr 28 AprMost seatsCon 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/5Lab 7/1 - 4/1 4/1Lib Dem 100/1 - 11/1 16/1Outright MajorityCon 8/15 13/8 11/8 7/4Lab 11/1 12/1 16/1 20/1Lib Dem - 25/1 22/1 33/1Hung Parliament 13/8 8/13 8/13 4/9
Most seatsCon 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/5Lab 7/1 - 4/1 4/1Lib Dem 100/1 - 11/1 16/1
Outright MajorityCon 8/15 13/8 11/8 7/4Lab 11/1 12/1 16/1 20/1Lib Dem - 25/1 22/1 33/1
Hung Parliament 13/8 8/13 8/13 4/9
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 07:34 (fifteen years ago)
Do you know where your 16 year-old is? If the Lib Dems get into power, your son or daughter could be starring in a porn film. Yes, that’s right: the party of nice Mr Clegg is actually the party of choice for dirty old men. It seems anyone over 16 should be allowed to watch “Naughty Nurses’ Lesbo Love”, and even act in it. The story – which has been unearthed from 2004 – is so gross, you want to laugh. Except that it won’t be so funny if it means our children will get sucked into the shady, sordid world of pornographers.
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:38 (fifteen years ago)
I liked the comment...
It’s a comletely pointless proposal anayway because USC 2257 in the USA requires all porn “actors” to be over 18, so a UK porn producer won’t use anybody under 18 because it would rule out the North American market completely.I know too much about this subject don’t I?
I know too much about this subject don’t I?
― Mark G, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:44 (fifteen years ago)
you don't get dragged into porn by watching, this isn't Tron
― went ham in a bad way (stevie), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:44 (fifteen years ago)
wau
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:44 (fifteen years ago)
The article linked does not mention 16-17 yr olds acting in porn anyway, just being able to watch it.
― a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:45 (fifteen years ago)
Another fine graduate of the good old leftwing New Statesman, its recent drift to the right is such an outrage.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:47 (fifteen years ago)
Angela Perkins, of the National Board of Catholic Women, said she was "speechless" at the news.
She said: "For a political party to say we think 16 is actually an adequate age to release children on to pornography is irresponsible.
"It's going backwards to the 18th Century.
Not backwards far enough for the National Board of Catholic Women, in other words
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:47 (fifteen years ago)
I'd hate to live in a morally degenerate world where 16 year olds look at pornography.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:49 (fifteen years ago)
to release children on to pornography
hmm, one way of describing something vaguely...
― Mark G, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:50 (fifteen years ago)
also, I read..
The story – which has been unearthed from 2004
as meaning that they'd unearthed a porn film where Nick Clegg appears as a lesbian nurse, or something...
― Mark G, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:54 (fifteen years ago)
And you wonder why nobody votes UKIP in General Elections
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:56 (fifteen years ago)
The article linked does not mention 16-17 yr olds acting in porn anyway
Yes,it does.
It seems anyone over 16 should be allowed to watch “Naughty Nurses’ Lesbo Love”, and even act in it.
Where can I get a copy of Naughty Nurses Lesbo Love?
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:57 (fifteen years ago)
Ask the propietor of the Daily Express, he probably financed it
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:59 (fifteen years ago)
The National Board of Catholic Women is quite happy for 16-year-olds to marry and have children but God forbid they watch other people shagging on tv.
― broad layering (onimo), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:59 (fifteen years ago)
You'll go blind you know
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 10:01 (fifteen years ago)
Down with this sort of thing, etc.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 10:02 (fifteen years ago)
No, Ned - I meant the story from 2004 on the BBC news site, which only says Lib Dems want to lower the age to WATCH porn.
― a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 10:02 (fifteen years ago)
Ok, sorry...carry on.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 10:04 (fifteen years ago)
Not like Odone to exaggerate to try and make a point...
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 10:05 (fifteen years ago)
The article linked does not mention 16-17 yr olds acting in porn anywayYes,it does.
No it doesn't.
It states that the C of E Spokesman regards porn as exploitative whatever the age of the participants.
(xpost ok, but heck I typed all that in, it's going somewhere)
― Mark G, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 10:09 (fifteen years ago)
Anyone who was 16 in 2004 will be 22 now, so I think they should finally be allowed to watch porn.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 10:10 (fifteen years ago)
What a rag for kids to appear in a movie, then be not old enough to actually watch themselves!
― Mark G, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 10:11 (fifteen years ago)
That's drag, not rag, obv.
Are there any 16 year olds who haven't seen pornography?
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 10:15 (fifteen years ago)
Johann Tari tweeted that Odone once asked him "What do gays think about the Middle East?" so I think we can safely dismiss anything else she has to say.
― Venga, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 10:24 (fifteen years ago)
*Hari
I tend to dismiss everything Johann Hari has to say as well really, unless he's accusing Littlejohn of secretly fancying him.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 10:33 (fifteen years ago)
hari once wrote an article telling us what iraqis thought about being invaded (they welcomed it iirc) so um you know glass houses
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 10:38 (fifteen years ago)
TS: Hari vs. Odone.... no thanks
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 10:39 (fifteen years ago)
"It's going backwards to the 18th Century.Not backwards far enough for the National Board of Catholic Women, in other words― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 04:47 (48 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 04:47 (48 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Pity we aren't going back to the 18th century where catholicism would be illegal.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 10:39 (fifteen years ago)
Could revive the Gordon Riots while we're on y/n?
― Sub/Doms Whipping Here (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 10:52 (fifteen years ago)
Was kind of baffled to see a Labour leaflet in current Lib Dem seat with a headline saying "The Lib Dems can't win here. A vote for Labour keeps out the Tories", then realised there was a picture of the Houses of Parliament underneath (second half still plainly untrue in a constituency where Labour are in 3rd)
― xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:08 (fifteen years ago)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_8BPw8BFVVL4/S9eQVps4NAI/AAAAAAAAAIA/QiViNfG6N7Y/s1600/escatter+10-04-28.png
― caek, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:23 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, more vagueness, now-ish.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:29 (fifteen years ago)
I hated him back then too but he appears to have changed and admits he was wrong about Iraq, very much unlike yer Aaronovitches and Cohens.
― Venga, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:31 (fifteen years ago)
It’s a bit more of a ruggedly old-school line on homosexuality than mine, but then Phillip Lardner comes from a more traditional part of the world. It’s not the kind of place you’d send Nick Boles to fight a seat, is it? It’s full of the sort of people whose best friends aren’t gay and who might probably raise a mildly disapproving eyebrow if a gay S & M club with a serious backroom – or even a gay bookshop or gay tearoom, come to that – were to set itself up next to the local kirk. And surely that’s their prerogative. They’re not from London, you know. Or Queer As Folk Manchester. They don’t love Graham Norton or Julian Clary. And why the hell should they?I would quite expect the Labour party or the Liberal Democrats not to understand this subtle point. But I wouldn’t expect it of Conservatives.First, Conservatism is a broad and tolerant church – and that ought to include toleration of the mild intolerance of free citizens like Lardner.Second, when the Conservative party starts playing the game of “offence-taking”, “victimhood”, “minority grievance” and so on, it is doing so on terms entirely dictated by the false values of the liberal-Left.
I would quite expect the Labour party or the Liberal Democrats not to understand this subtle point. But I wouldn’t expect it of Conservatives.
First, Conservatism is a broad and tolerant church – and that ought to include toleration of the mild intolerance of free citizens like Lardner.
Second, when the Conservative party starts playing the game of “offence-taking”, “victimhood”, “minority grievance” and so on, it is doing so on terms entirely dictated by the false values of the liberal-Left.
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:31 (fifteen years ago)
Delingpole's an enormous fucking troll. Just ignore him.
― Venga, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:32 (fifteen years ago)
Cracking first line. James Delingpole really is such a ludicrous figure I'm still not 100% sure he isn't a work of satire.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:34 (fifteen years ago)
but then Phillip Lardner comes from a more traditional part of the world.
And yet they still won't vote Tory there
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:35 (fifteen years ago)
Broad and tolerant church, tolerating intolerance everywhere...
― Mark G, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:35 (fifteen years ago)
What's a serious backroom in a gay S & M club?
― Mark G, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:36 (fifteen years ago)
That really is an insane construction. xpost
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:37 (fifteen years ago)
Standard parvenu material, really: he's all over When Boris Met Dave, simpering about carrying his teddy bear around like Sebastian Flyte and never getting picked for the Bullingdon.
Oh and BTW Gordon Brown's just been caught calling some woman in Rochdale a bigot, on one of those post-interview open mics.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:38 (fifteen years ago)
oh ho ho
― Times New Excels At (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:40 (fifteen years ago)
cue that other thread lol
― bracken free ditch (Ste), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:40 (fifteen years ago)
Where the Tory Party candidates, ahem, hang out?
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:40 (fifteen years ago)
A Sky News mic as well. Bet they've all been told never to take them off him.
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:40 (fifteen years ago)
will labour reap a poll bounce from the anti-bigot demographic, though
― Earning your Masters in Library and Information Science is beautiful (schlump), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:41 (fifteen years ago)
file under "only in the telegraph comments section":
I was involved in one nasty and dangerous incident many years back and I will give only sketchy details to avoid identification of the party involved.Ships officer is a transvestite.His Business and he never gave any inclination of this or made a nuisance of himself.He is spotted in Bugis Street and chased back to ship by mob of Prescott look-a-likes.I bundled the terror stricken guy into my cabin and stood at the top of the ladder with a very large wheel key in hand,bit like Thermopylae really.Mob howling for blood got some,but not what they were after.I was this chaps “minder” for remainder of voyage and he was OK, but the terror he showed that night is unforgettable.As was the animal hatred of the scumbags chasing him.Trannie are not gays I know,but you get the picture?
― joe, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:41 (fifteen years ago)
Immediately after the exchange she had said she would vote Labour. But after being told about his comments she said she would not.
LOL
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:43 (fifteen years ago)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8649012.stm
― village idiot (dog latin), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:43 (fifteen years ago)
Last time Murdoch footsoldiers had a good open-mic faux pas: when Jesse Jackson said he wanted to rip Barack Obama's nuts off.
Well, GB was in Rochdale - not everyone there is an upstanding socialist with pride in the Co-Op.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:44 (fifteen years ago)
Cock up on the old cross dressing front, what.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:45 (fifteen years ago)
Nice of the reporters to allow us to make up our own minds whether she was a bigot or not.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:47 (fifteen years ago)
"This is the trouble with the public, they're fucking horrible!"
― joe, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:47 (fifteen years ago)
I'm guessing that will not be the last time that Gordon Brown utters the phrase "that was a disaster" in the next couple of weeks.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:51 (fifteen years ago)
otm.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:52 (fifteen years ago)
Sometimes, you know, when you meet the real—the actual—people, you just look at their beady eyes and mean mouths sort of sneering and, I mean, I know this is what they think people like me think so I hate thinking it, but I just find myself thinking, “They’re from a different fucking species”. You know, with their t-shirts and weird trousers and… And why do they where clothes with writing on them? And why are the so fucking fat?
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:52 (fifteen years ago)
http://twitpic.com/1j2we3/full
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:53 (fifteen years ago)
irl malcom tuckers will be going through her life history as we type
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:54 (fifteen years ago)
"I just hate the general public"
http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/images/reviews/190/1261531108_1.jpg
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:55 (fifteen years ago)
http://s3.amazonaws.com/twitpic/photos/full/92514171.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=0ZRYP5X5F6FSMBCCSE82&Expires=1272456653&Signature=%2BHX1oGVmWxJbvBxyfscpdz1S2G4%3D
― yes we kenya (suzy), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:55 (fifteen years ago)
they should film him reacting to that footage now, keep the perpetual gaffe machine running until election day
― joe, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:56 (fifteen years ago)
Calls to mind another doomed Scottish leader
http://www.rampantscotland.com/graphics/mcleod_ally1211b.jpg
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:58 (fifteen years ago)
http://onlinesportsinformation.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/gordon-strachan.jpg
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 11:59 (fifteen years ago)
http://home.btconnect.com/rdi/frazer.jpg
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:00 (fifteen years ago)
Apparently, he's phoned the bigoted old bag to apologise
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:02 (fifteen years ago)
http://lake.blogs.com/.a/6a00d83452654869e200e55282a8928834-500pi
Brown's constituency Labour Party respond to today's gaffe.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:02 (fifteen years ago)
Hah, that was an xpost. Lol open goal.
RT: @VizTopTips: HANDING IN YOUR NOTICE? Save paper by wearing a radio mic and calling a fat northern racist woman a Bigot
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:03 (fifteen years ago)
TOO SOON
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gillian_Duffy
― joe, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:04 (fifteen years ago)
'See also: List Of UK Bigots'
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:05 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/vote_2010/gordon+brown+calls+labour+voted+ampaposbigotedampapos/3628887
Full interview here. Brown's fake chumminess is almost as painful as the gaffe.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:06 (fifteen years ago)
just heard it on R4... oh god... oh god...
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:07 (fifteen years ago)
Brown's fake chumminess is almost as painful as the gaffe
yeah
What did she say?
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:09 (fifteen years ago)
Conservative Party chairman Eric Pickles tweets on what is now known as #BigotGate on Twitter: "Every voter should know that Brown's view of the electorate is you either agree with him or you are the enemy."
i just heard GB explaining... he refers to a question on immigration. but in what i've heard she didn't mention immigration. did he mean some other woman? or is there a bit we missed or?
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:10 (fifteen years ago)
Duffy also told Brown: "You can't say anything about the immigrants - all these Eastern Europeans were flocking in."
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:11 (fifteen years ago)
NRQ - scroll down on that link, watch the 5min clip.
Hahaha oh god the guy who chips in with "more than ever" is pure Ollie.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:12 (fifteen years ago)
ah. doesn't really justify "bigoted" but at least there's something there.
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:13 (fifteen years ago)
The full thing is painful, this woman's a lifelong Labour voter and council worker and she makes herself look appalling. No one comes out of that with any credit at all.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:15 (fifteen years ago)
oh god it's unwatchable, the whole thing. R4 only played the end of the encounter.
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:15 (fifteen years ago)
Brown apologises for offending a woman with offensive views. It's unfortunate his disparaging comments were caught on mic, but ultimately he's right. The woman IS a bigot. And if she's basing her vote on the PM rather than the party, then she's an idiot. Brown has actually risen in my estimation over this. Can't believe the way the press are spinning this. Even the BBC aren't questioning her comments.
― Count Palmiro Vicarion (Stew), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:16 (fifteen years ago)
and here u all are judging gordon brown--who is the true bigot i ask you
― max, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:16 (fifteen years ago)
I was talking about this the other night. All this stuff about Brown being a weirdo with no empathy... this is the country where Margaret Thatcher was PM for 13 years!
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:16 (fifteen years ago)
... . not to mention John Major and Ted Heath!
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:17 (fifteen years ago)
Can't believe the way the press are spinning this.
?
― caek, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:18 (fifteen years ago)
this is probably worse than prescott lamping that welshman tbh
― caek, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:19 (fifteen years ago)
he almost turns it around at the four minute mark where he says "education, health and helping vulnerable people - that's what i'm about", echoing her words about labour values, then she agrees with him and shakes his hand. JUST STOP THERE.
― joe, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:19 (fifteen years ago)
It's much worse, the Welsh dude actually assaulted Prescott first.
It makes grass roots Labour activists look awful as well. The Tories will jump gleefully on this after years of being portrayed as the party full of bigots and who can blame them?
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:19 (fifteen years ago)
which party has the worst grass roots activists?
― caek, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:20 (fifteen years ago)
'two jags' was seen by most people as worse than punching a civilian
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:21 (fifteen years ago)
brown should have punched her
― caek, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:22 (fifteen years ago)
wheres bully brown when you need him
― max, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:23 (fifteen years ago)
It is a goldmine for the Tories, along the lines of "When anyone raises concerns about immigration, Gordon Brown dismisses them as bigots"
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:23 (fifteen years ago)
After a few minutes of exchanges she told reporters that Brown was a "very nice man" and that she had voted Labour all her life and intended to do so again next week.
snatching defeat from the jaws of victory
― joe, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:23 (fifteen years ago)
i think yall are being a bit sheltered if you think her views are unusual among voters. that or i just have a really low opinion of people. you choose!
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:24 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think they're unusual at all!
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:25 (fifteen years ago)
A political spokesman for the prime minister said: "Gordon has apologised to Mrs Duffy personally by phone. He does not think that she is bigoted. He was letting off steam in the car after a difficult conversation. But this is exactly the sort of conversation that is important in an election campaign and which he will continue to have with voters."
Laughs aplenty to come then!
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:27 (fifteen years ago)
Ok, spinning it is the wrong word, but I do find the general assumption in the press that this is disastrous and Brown is the villain questionable. While he doesn't come across particularly well for appearing two-faced. Nick Robinson is saying on the BBC that there was nothing racist about it, she was only talking about Easter Europeans coming here and taking jobs. So it's not racist to complain about Eastern Europeans? They don't count? So much for impartial commentary.
― Count Palmiro Vicarion (Stew), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:28 (fifteen years ago)
Just because views are common doesn't mean people are in any way right to hold them.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:28 (fifteen years ago)
During their exchange in the street, Mrs Duffy told the Prime Minister: 'You can't say anything about immigrants.'
She added: 'All these eastern Europeans - where are they coming from?'
Uh, eastern Europe?
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:28 (fifteen years ago)
Nick Robinson is saying on the BBC that there was nothing racist about it, she was only talking about Easter Europeans coming here and taking jobs. So it's not racist to complain about Eastern Europeans? They don't count? So much for impartial commentary.
it slightly depends on the nature of the complaint, but i wouldn't jump to call it racist, which is a way of shutting down any kind of debate. unless you're in favour of unlimited immigration, there is always a debate to be had; and it does concern people that the government estimate of post-2004 immigration was wrong by a large margin (like 10x).
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:31 (fifteen years ago)
― yes we kenya (suzy), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:28 (52 seconds ago) Bookmark
you can engage with them much better than brown did though. just slagging off the woman behind her back looks terrible. can't he win an argument about immigration with a rochdale pensioner? especially one who's inclined to be persuaded by a labour prime minister.
― joe, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:32 (fifteen years ago)
but i wouldn't jump to call it racist,
Neither did Gordon Brown
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:33 (fifteen years ago)
yeah he waited till he was in his car... much better
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:34 (fifteen years ago)
Sue's just confirmed for Strictly
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:34 (fifteen years ago)
Uh no, he didn't call her a "racist". that too difficult for you to grasp?
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:36 (fifteen years ago)
'Bigot' is an accurate label for someone who disparages Eastern Europeans ON FUCKING CAMERA IN FRONT OF MEDIA. Sorry for yelling, if he'd said it to her face I'd have been quite proud of him.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:37 (fifteen years ago)
RIP the word 'xenophobic' we had some good times
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:37 (fifteen years ago)
n e way i was responding to stew, who i think does call her a racist
brown called her a bigot not a racist -- this is a pretty fine distinction tom!
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:38 (fifteen years ago)
I don't care if he calls a bigot a bigot, behind her back or otherwise, the thing that made him look bad in my eyes is he gets in his car, calls it a disaster (when it wasn't really), then immediately tries to shift the blame onto poor old "Sue". Take it like a man, Gordon!
― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:39 (fifteen years ago)
Well yes, maybe. Coming from the West of Scotland, the word "bigot" tends to be thrown around a lot and not in connection with racism, so maybe my view of it is skewed.
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:40 (fifteen years ago)
I had a Gordon Brown moment there
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)
If you're a mainstream political leader in 2010 it probably does, sadly.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)
― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, April 28, 2010 1:39 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark
loved the way he delivered "whose idea was that?"
i agree with him: baby-kissing is not his forte.
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)
Pensioner-baiting, yes. Car seat stabbing, yes.
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:43 (fifteen years ago)
Silver lining - at least he wasn't on record beating up his female aide in the car.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:44 (fifteen years ago)
I imagine "Sue" is back licking envelopes now...
― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:46 (fifteen years ago)
haha, amnesty international just condemned gillian duffy on twitter, now backtracking in embarrassment. hope they issue a full report on her human rights abuses.
― joe, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:46 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe racist is a bit strong gien that we only have this comment to go on, but yes, she is expressing bigoted views. I accept that in blaming 'Sue' Gordon doesn't come across very well, but I can't argue with his comments about the 'bigoted woman'. It's true that Gordon could have handled this a lot better by confronting her views in person. He should have raised the point that lack of resources, rather than immigration, is the real issue. Sadly The Mail, Express and Sun have skewed the debate on immigration so far to the right that defending immigration is seen as somehow abnormal.
― Count Palmiro Vicarion (Stew), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:48 (fifteen years ago)
Sadly The Mail, Express and Sun have skewed the debate on immigration so far to the right that defending immigration is seen as somehow abnormal.
Yet Boris Johnson doesn't find it abnormal
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:49 (fifteen years ago)
He should have raised the point that lack of resources, rather than immigration, is the real issue
In an economy Brown's been running for 13 years? How could he possibly say that without inflaming the argument?
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
Yes, but he's mayor of London, the most cosmopolitan city in Britain. The CBI make the economic case for immigration, but that's very different to making the moral case, which is something the government have been reluctant to do.
Matt, that is a fair point. I did mean to mention that he's in a difficult position, because to admit to lack of resources would be an admission of Labour's failure to build more council houses, improve amenities etc...
― Count Palmiro Vicarion (Stew), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:55 (fifteen years ago)
What I don't get is - when the pro-bigot and anti-two-face vote is gone, why not just pitch for the anti-bigot vote, instead of going for the spineless obseqious vote? I gained some respect for him for a moment.
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:55 (fifteen years ago)
fringe minorities do not win elections
― caek, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:57 (fifteen years ago)
Still, this is what happens when you allow The Sun and The Mail to run the debate for years. Labour's approach to immigration isn't much less cravenly populist than that of the Tories, in fact it's just another variation on "immigrants have greatly enhanced our culture and economy and now we're going to clamp down on them". They won't actually do it, I doubt even the Tories will, but they have to make a show of doing it because it's easier than actually trying to win the argument.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:58 (fifteen years ago)
Oh dear, Gordon expressed an opinion.
You won't catch Cameron doing that, not at the moment anyway...
― Mark G, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:01 (fifteen years ago)
oh just fucking ban all politics ever
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:01 (fifteen years ago)
If I thought this was the sum total of politics then I'd agree
― Sub/Doms Whipping Here (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:02 (fifteen years ago)
Prediction for tomorrow's debate is that Clegg starts talking an awful lot about "Labour and Tory bigots".
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:03 (fifteen years ago)
prediction: brown says a bunch of bigotted stuff just to make clear he's not anti-bigot
― caek, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:03 (fifteen years ago)
Could see him itching to get into the Papishes in the last debate tbh
― Sub/Doms Whipping Here (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:04 (fifteen years ago)
ha
I mean that today's events are just going to lead to so much fucking bullshit - as probably said upthread this is The Thick Of It but not funny in any way - she WAS being a bit lunkheaded but GB handled it catastrophically - thing is, it'll be THE main lever of Conservative crunching-inevitably-to-majority-win now
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:05 (fifteen years ago)
and all because 2/3 of the British population is in fact at the very least tacitly bigoted
there ain't much tacit about it round our way
― Sub/Doms Whipping Here (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:06 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think this makes a Tory majority an inevitability at all.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:06 (fifteen years ago)
No. Most xenophobes are either not gonna vote Labour anyway or don't vote Labour for the xenophobia.
― Sub/Doms Whipping Here (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:07 (fifteen years ago)
I hate the way the woman is trying to escape and it looks like Brown is pursuing her to ask her crepey questions about her grandchildren.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:08 (fifteen years ago)
TBH I don't want Labour to come out of this well; I hate them too. I want everyone to seem as bad as everyone else. Sadly, Cameron can use this to get an easier ride than he should have. I hope Clegg at least nails him tomorrow.
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:11 (fifteen years ago)
I hope you're right, but there are a lot of traditional Labour voters - ie white working class - who blame immigrants for their problems. Proof that the old ruling class tactics of dividing the poor still work, sadly.
― Count Palmiro Vicarion (Stew), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:11 (fifteen years ago)
good luck britain
― Fade to Ugly Dave Gray (King Boy Pato), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:13 (fifteen years ago)
had forgotten this goodness
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FnmnuDiVno
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:13 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think this makes a Tory majority an inevitability at all.― Matt DC, Wednesday, April 28, 2010 2:06 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Matt DC, Wednesday, April 28, 2010 2:06 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
the guy was rude about (worse than rude to) someone i guess most of the electorate think they have more in common with than they do with politicians. most people are right in the superficial sense that gordon brown is a weird dude among weird dudes, and some are right in sense that they are in fact actual bigots, which gordon brown is not. true, the bona fide bigot vote is mostly in constituencies that are rock solid labour, so this won't change anything there. it's not going to help elsewhere though, given there is already an "us vs. them" feeling about a lot of anti-labour sentiment. "inevitability" is a jaggerism though.
― caek, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:14 (fifteen years ago)
According to 5 Live, it's a story that the media aren't going to let go of. They then accosted the woman in the street, got some other media reactions (it's a story that the media aren't going to let go of, apparently), read some texts and tweets from Joe Public (typical comment: the media aren't going to let go of this one), then went to a phone-in on the subject of whether the media are making a big fuss over nothing.
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:15 (fifteen years ago)
lol at BOBBY Brown now twending
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:15 (fifteen years ago)
forgive my melodrama. i got it from radio 5 so maybe my perceptions have been thusly skewed
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:16 (fifteen years ago)
Also that whole Lib Dem thing. It might make a Lib-Con coalition government more likely, or perhaps make it easier for the LibDems to demand Brown's resignation safe in the knowledge that most of the Labour Party want that too.
Unless people have forgotten all about this in a week, which is also very possible.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:17 (fifteen years ago)
don't think the lib dems would have much trouble getting brown's resignation anyway
― caek, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:19 (fifteen years ago)
'Gordan' trending but it's all people complaining about 'Gordan' being a trend and why can't people spell his name properly.
Duffy should take him to task for calling her a "bigoted WOMAN" as opposed to just a bigot.
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:22 (fifteen years ago)
he is good at identifying women, tbf. he did it during the last debate too.
― caek, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)
should have punched that woman imho
― Fade to Ugly Dave Gray (King Boy Pato), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/4/28/1272457076477/Gordon-Brown-on-the-Jerem-006.jpg
Is he hearing the new MGMT album for the first time?
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:25 (fifteen years ago)
Just seen that Capello's considering taking Ledley King to the World Cup.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:26 (fifteen years ago)
i suppose this close to the economy debate is the least bad time to do something like this
― caek, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:26 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe GB should have called her "the most disgusting savage imo".
― Fade to Ugly Dave Gray (King Boy Pato), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)
Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg said: "You should always try to answer the questions as best you can."
― caek, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:29 (fifteen years ago)
http://twitter.com/bigotedwoman
― broad layering (onimo), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:29 (fifteen years ago)
I love his head in hands and deep sigh when Vine tells him we have the tape here!Can't stop laughing!
― not_goodwin, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:31 (fifteen years ago)
Jonjo Shelvey is trending above ANY of this fwiw
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:32 (fifteen years ago)
Charlton Athletic midfielder >>>>>> crucial election gaffe
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:33 (fifteen years ago)
the bona fide bigot vote is mostly in constituencies that are rock solid labour
Yes, that's right, the working classes are bigots, the bastards
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:33 (fifteen years ago)
really?
― caek, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:35 (fifteen years ago)
You seem to be implying as much
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:35 (fifteen years ago)
In other equally painful (imo) quotes: "Be clear. If you cut me in half, I am a believer in the United Kingdom. It's tatooed on me like a stick of rock. I would never do anything to endanger the family that is the United Kingdom."
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:36 (fifteen years ago)
It's tatooed on me like a stick of rock.
???
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:38 (fifteen years ago)
(Cameron, obv)
Btw, has anyone seen the bigoted woman's own quote?: "All these eastern Europeans - where are they coming from?"
I mean, duh.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:38 (fifteen years ago)
Do you think Gordon will casually slip into the debate tomorrow night: "I met a bigoted pensioner in Rochdale the other day..."
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:40 (fifteen years ago)
"really?" because i'm kinda joking, but (i) most of the people who will identify with where this woman is coming from both personally and in policy detail are labour voters (ii) i didn't mention working class (iii) i'm from the bit of the country you're defending.
― caek, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:40 (fifteen years ago)
lol at me suggesting this woman has a detailed policy, but you get the idea
I see nigel farage is now after mrs duffy's vote
― naglian dialectics 101 (cozen), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:42 (fifteen years ago)
most of the people who will identify with where this woman is coming from both personally and in policy detail are labour voters
In 'policy detail' (yes, LOL), I'd say an awful lot of them aren't Labour voters, not that they would want to be identified with some old dear from Rochdale
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:43 (fifteen years ago)
Btw, has anyone seen the bigoted woman's own quote?: "All these eastern Europeans - where are they coming from?"I mean, duh.
She actually said "...where are they flocking from?". While that initially appears an equally stupid question, it does at least offer us the slender possibility that she thinks Eastern Europeans can fly, and that she wants to know where they all gathered together before flying across the sea to Blighty.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:44 (fifteen years ago)
Someone needs to do a Downfall overdub of Hitler's reaction to this, while they still can.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:44 (fifteen years ago)
please no more!
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:46 (fifteen years ago)
oversub fyi
― the big pink suede panda bear hurts (ledge), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:47 (fifteen years ago)
xxxxp, i think a lot of people would rather think of themselves as like some old dear from rochdale than like gordon brown. this is gb's problem. if this was some shrill ex-major from tunbridge wells we wouldn't be having this discussion.
― caek, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:47 (fifteen years ago)
Don't think this is good for the Lib Dems either, tbh. It puts immigration back in the headlines, and their amnesty ideas are pretty much out of step with the Rochdale bigot demographic.
― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:49 (fifteen years ago)
Look forward to Rochdale Bigot becoming the UK's very own Joe the Plumber.
― Stevie T, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:49 (fifteen years ago)
Descriptors like 'flocking' are not much change from 'swarming' TBH.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:50 (fifteen years ago)
Breaking News: PM to visit Rochdale woman at home.
Keep digging...
― broad layering (onimo), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)
i believe "flooding" is the preferred nomenclature
― caek, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)
more like Janek The Plumber RIGHT?
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)
Don't think this is good for the Lib Dems either, tbh
Never ones to let a bandwagon trundle by, the Liberals:
'Out campaigning in Oxford, Nick Clegg says it is not bigoted to raise questions over the immigration system.'
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)
"Raise questions"
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:52 (fifteen years ago)
PM to visit Rochdale woman at home
she's hurriedly hiding all the Nazi memorabilia as we type
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:52 (fifteen years ago)
How excruciatingly toe-curling is that going to be
― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:54 (fifteen years ago)
Politician takes advantage of rival politician's mistake shock horror.
― Fade to Ugly Dave Gray (King Boy Pato), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:55 (fifteen years ago)
gb's problem is that he called her names behind her back. in one stroke he demonstrates that 1) you can't trust what he says in public 2) he has contempt for those with different views 3) refuses to take responsibility for tough situations, preferring to blame subordinates and 4) as was said above, is apparently totally flustered by and unable to win an argument with a rochdale pensioner
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:55 (fifteen years ago)
CRINGE.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:55 (fifteen years ago)
Awesome television!
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:57 (fifteen years ago)
Is it true that Gordan got sonned in an immigration beef with a Rochdale pensioner?
― Fade to Ugly Dave Gray (King Boy Pato), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:58 (fifteen years ago)
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:55 (2 minutes ago) Bookmark
this
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:58 (fifteen years ago)
Tracer nailed it really.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:58 (fifteen years ago)
i mean, the substance of it is beside the point.
would be so awesome if The Rochdale Pensioner became the UK's answer to Joe the Plumber
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:59 (fifteen years ago)
2) he has contempt for those with different views
He has contempt for those with bigoted views, you mean?
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:01 (fifteen years ago)
Tbh I think most people would take number 1 and 2 for granted for just about any politician, and number 3 was widely known about him already. Even number 4 isn't that true, because he seemed to rescued a difficult situation by the end of the 'interview'. The problem is that he's got caught calling her a bigoted woman and in the soundbite-obsessed media that's the only thing that's going to reverberate for the next few days: hardly anyone is going to watch the full five minutes to see the context.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:01 (fifteen years ago)
3) refuses to take responsibility for tough situations, preferring to blame subordinates
Take responsibility for what? Meeting some woman with bigoted views in immigration?
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:02 (fifteen years ago)
they just walked into her house without knocking lol
― broad layering (onimo), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:02 (fifteen years ago)
hope she's got some KitKats in
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:03 (fifteen years ago)
I wonder what Cameron said, in private, about the underling who set up that meeting with the guy with disabled child who bollocked him yesterday
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:03 (fifteen years ago)
Except:
"Unable to win an argument with a rochdale Pensioner"
I mean, who wins an argument? It's all just "I think, you think" and if no-one's going to change their mind, how can anyone win?
This is more like the pensioner that argued with MThatch about the Belgrano 'sailing out of the conflict zone'. Thatch insisted it was not. Everyone else knew it was. So, go win that one!
― Mark G, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:04 (fifteen years ago)
except that time it was the politician that bigoted
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:05 (fifteen years ago)
Cameron hasn't been stupid enough to get overheard doing it yet though.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:05 (fifteen years ago)
he says something like "who put me with her??" instead of being like "wow, that wasn't easy."
i mean, think of obama's original convo with joe the plumber. the guy just flat-out disagreed with obama about everything and obama calmly walked him through the facts. if you're a politician don't you WANT to be put in a position where you can make your case to someone who doesn't agree? gb's attitude is like a baseball player who doesn't want the ball hit in his direction.
Tbh I think most people would take number 1 and 2 for granted for just about any politician, and number 3 was widely known about him already.
sure but you don't exactly want to go around proving these things right, ON TAPE.
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)
"I was talking to a bigoted woman in Rochdale who told me she was worried that there were black men in Plymouth who had been here for 30 years..."
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, April 28, 2010 3:01 PM (46 seconds ago) Bookmark
it's the callousness of his response. she's not perfect (but on the other hand she didn't steer the british economy into the biggest catastrophe for generations -- what up) but after spending a few minutes pretending to try to "get to know her" and cramming in talking-point references about how students earn twice as much as regular folk, and being fake cheery with her, he then quite coldly calls her a bigot. personally i think that's worse than her saying that you can't talk about immigration without being called a bigot. if she's said something directly bad about the character of eastern europeans or something -- alright, but then he should have challenged her. but she didn't, did she?
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:08 (fifteen years ago)
and obama calmly walked him through the facts
But who knows what he said about him in private!
he then quite coldly calls her a bigot
Hotly, I'd say!
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:09 (fifteen years ago)
if she's said something directly bad about the character of eastern europeans or something
A characteristic of the Eastern Europeans being that they're not in Eastern Europe, they're over here
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:10 (fifteen years ago)
indeed, who knows, but i doubt Obama bollocked his assistants for putting him next to Joe. he relishes that shit.
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:11 (fifteen years ago)
"He's a jackaass!"
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:11 (fifteen years ago)
well, yeah. if only we were as tolerant to incomers as the eastern europeans -- kidding, kidding.
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:11 (fifteen years ago)
also this, although she's coming from a bigoted POV. he should merely have countered her calmly and put her in her place, face-to-face.
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:12 (fifteen years ago)
I thought he did?
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:12 (fifteen years ago)
the point is that she didn't say anything particularly reprehensible, as voter vox-pops go - and GB revealed weaknesses in his outburst that he'd allayed while talking to her
yyyyyyep
too often the press seizes on some supposedly character-revealing gaffe as the explanatory framework for an entire campaign but frankly GB has really made his bed with this one
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:13 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah Brown's response once immigration came up was woefully inadequate. Surely it crossed someone's mind that it might come up when talking to members of the general public. Surely Brown could have come up with a better response than "well some British people are moving to Europe too"?
You want your leaders to be able to match bigotry with reasoned debate - when Brown was put on the spot he couldn't do it. Instead he flapped, he crawled to her a bit and then bitched about her in the car.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:13 (fifteen years ago)
He's in her house!!!!!!
― Tonight, the Looming Moment of Crunch (Tom D.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:15 (fifteen years ago)
Got his microphone turned off this time.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:17 (fifteen years ago)
THE QUEEN AND JOHN MAJOR HAVE HAD A FIGHT
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:17 (fifteen years ago)
Shadow chancellor George Osborne said: "That's the thing about general elections, they do reveal the truth about people."
― MPx4A, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:19 (fifteen years ago)
BBC News 24 cameras trained on a white door in Rochdale for 20 minutes :/
― broad layering (onimo), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:21 (fifteen years ago)
just made that reference to a friend as we watched bbc news. xposts.
― Gee, Officer (Gukbe), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:23 (fifteen years ago)
she is like a care assistant or something? and her familiarity with eastern europeans is probably as transitory agency workers competing with and depreciating wages for people she wd know
so flocking probably wd correlate with the (10x govt projection) sudden influx of cheap slavic labour
how does she benefit from liberalized immigration?
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:25 (fifteen years ago)
As a service user of hospitals, for starters.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:28 (fifteen years ago)
she's a pensioner, so she's not really at the sharp end of the does-immigration-depress-wages debate.
― joe, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:29 (fifteen years ago)
everyone benefits from liberalised immigration, silly!
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:30 (fifteen years ago)
"Stay with us Ian, we're going to stay with the picture of that door..."
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:33 (fifteen years ago)
1503: Gordon Brown is at Gillian Duffy's house. He smiles and nods to the media, before entering through her porch.
Steady...
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:34 (fifteen years ago)
are there a lot of nurses etc from those countries? cheaper cleaning contracts for local health authorities maybe
and maybe slightly cheaper food/goods
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:34 (fifteen years ago)
Everything about this is just excruciatingly pathetic.
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:35 (fifteen years ago)
worth it for the lols maybe
# a scotish man has arived at my house, he keeps doing a wierd thing with his tongue i think he is a immigrant 25 minutes ago via web
― broad layering (onimo), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:36 (fifteen years ago)
@TheFagCasanova Any second Gordon Brown will come crashing through that window. Brush the glass off, straighten his tie, crack his knuckles and go back in..
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:36 (fifteen years ago)
can't really get a read on that twitter acct. kinda feels like the author does think she's a racist? when she probably isn't? or is that the joke?
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:35 (3 minutes ago) Bookmark
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:39 (fifteen years ago)
imo it's a intra-party stitch-up to distract from the implications of the IFS report
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)
I think whoever set it up decided "You can't talk about immigrants because... where are they all flocking from" is enough to label her as bigoted and anti-immigration.
― broad layering (onimo), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)
Labour going with "he's a man who doesn't run away from his mistakes"
oh door has opened...
― broad layering (onimo), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)
are there a lot of nurses etc from those countries?
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:42 (fifteen years ago)
So this woman is Josephine the Plumstress, then.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:42 (fifteen years ago)
they can make like 10x in britain what they do back home
costs a bit more to live in britain mind you
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:43 (fifteen years ago)
There aren't any British plumbers any more because all the Poles have put them out of jobs innit?
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:45 (fifteen years ago)
BBC reporter - "Mr Brown ignoring our questions about whether he still thinks Mrs. Duffy is bigoted..."
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:45 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, I would think the living expenses would eat up the extra salary. xxp
― ô_o (Nicole), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:45 (fifteen years ago)
Bunch of cunts banging the woman's door now.
― broad layering (onimo), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)
srsly? the most recent numbers i can find are from 2007 suggest ~1000 nhs workers from recent eu accession countries
probably more than that now
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)
I really hope she had the time to install cctv before Brown came in for tea.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:48 (fifteen years ago)
Totally seeing why Charlie Brooker goes so heavy on this breaking live on the spot news story feeding news story shite. Two journalists on TV telling each other this won't goes away is what stops it going away.
― broad layering (onimo), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:48 (fifteen years ago)
xxp that's because they took nurses of the shortage occupation lists in 2006, because of bigots. before that it was 15,000 a year.
― joe, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:48 (fifteen years ago)
that's why many of them return home a couple of years later
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:49 (fifteen years ago)
Imagine Brown's conversation with his advisers:
-PM, you have to go back and talk to her.-No way.-PM, the whole campaign is on the line here. We've got to do something. You'd look good by going to chat to a real citizen in her home...-Gawd if I must. What the fuck have I done??
etc etc
― Daniel Giraffe, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:50 (fifteen years ago)
maybe they had enough nurses? sure they're a vital constituency but i doubt pandering to xenophobics is the entire determinant of govt policy
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:52 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, I would think the living expenses would eat up the extra salary.
i can't remember where i read all of this but the salary that say, a trained anesthesiologist makes in slovakia is shockingly low, like what a british hotel clerk makes
however all of this is distracting us from the real point, which is that gordon brown is a complete buffoon
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:54 (fifteen years ago)
Brown's hapless apologises during the conf with Vine just gave the impression that his advisers have given up completely and he is a little lost lamb who doesn't really understand what is happening and just wants the press to stop bullying him.
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:55 (fifteen years ago)
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, April 28, 2010 3:46 PM (40 seconds ago) Bookmark
i worked in health recruitment pre- and post-2004
so yeah, we recruited from eastern europe, but we did have hospitals before then
brit nurses were getting themselves agents, not returning calls, being real prima donnas, demanding first-dollar gross, etc., c. 2002, so it was a needed thing i guess
tho with the accession came the policy that if you had qualified in the EU, you were automatically on-paper qualified to work in the UK; but practically, you weren't tbrr
and outside the EU, the politics of stripping the developing world (and/or slovakia) of its healthcare professionals -- the politics were not straightforward
all this is to say that the politics of immigration are quite complicated and are a legitimate thing to debate!
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:55 (fifteen years ago)
omg this cunt on BBC saying "the clearest message that his apology has been accepted would be for Mrs Duffy to come out of that door and walk over to that post box and post her vote for Labour but until she does that..." basically saying they should camp there until they find out what her vote is.
She has just been described as a "Sword of Damocles hanging over the Labour Party" I need to stop watching this.
― broad layering (onimo), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 14:58 (fifteen years ago)
Especially as I now have the Rocky Horror show in my brane...
― Mark G, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)
if only fat racists from rochdale had sufficient grasp of macroeconomics to participate
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)
oh god i just saw brown being played the tape
heartbreaking
if only jeremy vine had a gunge tank
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 15:08 (fifteen years ago)
Think you've just come up with this year's Election Night graphic
― Sub/Doms Whipping Here (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 15:09 (fifteen years ago)
oh i forgot the last thing: not knowing he was miked up makes him look simply incompetent, which is maybe the worst of all
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 15:19 (fifteen years ago)
Current bbc sidebar reads:
Nick Robinson: 'That was a disaster'Profile of the woman behind rowTranscripts: All the exchangesAnalysis: Why it mattersClassic gaffes caught on tapeReaction to 'bigoted' commentYour views on Brown's comment
FUCKING NEWS
― JimD, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)
I believe the media reaction is that the media isn't going to let go of this one. Going to have to keep paying attention to the media to find out how the media will react.
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)
the kinda lazy assumption i've always had is that immigration of working class people usually _is_ bad for autocthonous working class people, and that's one of the reasons it was encouraged
like obv there were shortages of bus drivers and textile workers in the 50s or 60s but i imagine some of the home office mandarins were vaguely aware of the effects they and their children wd have in damaging working class solidarity, polarizing organized labour, depreciating wages, nurturing futile resentment etc.....the indian civil service was amazingly efficient for decades in large part due to their expertise at factional politics, divide and rule etc and i guess a few of them got reassigned in whitehall
the supine condition of the british working class, indeed the liberal adopton of 'white working class' as parodic cause celebre wd be testmament to their success
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)
*testament
yep, pretty lazy!
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)
congratulations on avoiding the word "indigenous" though, that took some doing
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)
Fixed, sorta.
If your working classes are costing too much, import more and keep the pay low.
THen get them to blame each other!
― Mark G, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)
otm this is unbearable.
― pollos da don (tpp), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)
trust murdoch's sky news to be the one who left their microphone on him...
maybe that's too conspiratorial though.
― nevermind312, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
murdoch probably gave brown his terrible interpersonal skills too
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)
"who's idea was this?" -- he might well ask. it was probably rebekah wade's, fed to a turncoat labour aide.
maybe the Sun's headline tommorrow should be "GOTCHA"
― nevermind312, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)
I can just about bear Brown's terrible handling of this (it's hardly news that he's pretty terrible with the general public, which was why he's mostly been kept away from them) but the thought of James Murdoch joyfully dancing around his office makes me want to puke.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)
Haven't even looked at a newspaper yet and I'm sick of this story.
― Not the real Village People, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)
http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01033/wide-splash-3col-b_1033566a.jpghttp://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01033/wide-splash-3col-b_1033565a.jpghttp://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01033/wide-splash-3col-b_1033564a.jpg
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)
seems to be as much mockery for apologising as for saying it
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)
Apologies for long post. This is the transcript of his meeting (from the Mail) - it seems to me that he does pretty well answering her questions. She goes from one thing to another (which is fair enough) but he sticks with it and I think he handles the immigration bit OK. I mean it's all soundbite stuff but it doesn't sound like he losing the argument. Pity he fucked it up in the car after though, obviously.
Gillian Duffy: The thing that I can't understand is why am I still being taxed at 66 years old because my husband's died and I had some of his pension tagged on to mine?
Gordon Brown: Well we are raising the threshold at which people start paying tax as pensioners. But yes, if you've got an occupational pension you may have to pay some tax but you may be eligible for the pension credit as well, you should check.
Gillian Duffy: No, no I'm not. I've checked and checked and they said no, they can't do it.
Gordon Brown: Well you should look at it again just to be sure, absolutely sure.
Gillian Duffy: Yes, yes they've told me. I've been down to Rochdale council to try and get it off my tax.
Gordon Brown: You know we're linking the pension to earnings in two years' time, we've got the winter allowance as you know which I hope is a benefit, the winter allowance.
Gillian Duffy: I agree with that, it's very good, but every year I talk to people my age and they say they'll be knocking it off, it will be going. It will be.
Gordon Brown: We're keeping it. We have done the bus passes, we have done the free eye tests, free prescriptions.
Gillian Duffy: But how are you going to get us out of all this debt Gordon?
Gordon Brown: Because we have got a deficit reduction plan to cut the debt in half over the next four years. We've got the plans, they've been set out today. Look I was a person who came in...
Gillian Duffy: The three main things what I had drummed in when I was a child was education, health service and looking after people who are vulnerable. But there's too many people now who aren't vulnerable but they can claim, and people who are vulnerable can't claim, can't get it.
Gordon Brown: But they shouldn't be doing that, there is no life on the dole for people any more. If you are unemployed you've got to go back to work. It's six months...
Gillian Duffy: You can't say anything about the immigrants because you're saying that you're... but all these eastern Europeans what are coming in, where are they flocking from?
Gordon Brown: A million people have come from Europe but a million British people have gone into Europe. You do know that there's a lot of British people staying in Europe as well. Look, come back to what were your initial principles: helping people - that's what we're in the business of doing. A decent health service, that's really important, and education. Now these are the things that we have tried to do. We're going to maintain the schools so that we can make sure that people have that chance to get on. We're going to maintain the health service so that...
Gillian Duffy: And what are you going to do about students who are coming in then, all this that you have to pay, you've scrapped that Gordon.
Gordon Brown: Which one?
Gillian Duffy: To help people who go to university.
Gordon Brown: Tuition fees?
Gillian Duffy: Yes.
Gordon Brown: Yeah but look we've got...
Gillian Duffy: I'm thinking about my grandchildren here. What will they have to pay to get into university?
Gordon Brown: You've got 40% of young people now going to university, more than ever, so you've got to have some balance. If you get a degree and you earn twice as much after you get the degree then you've got to pay something back as a contribution. But there are grants for your grandchildren, there are grants, more grants than ever before. You know more young people are going to university than ever before, and for the first year the majority of people going to university are women - so there's big opportunities for women. So education, health and helping people, that's what I'm about. That's what I'm about.
Gillian Duffy: Well congratulations, and I hope you can keep it up.
Gordon Brown: It's been very good to meet you, and you're wearing the right colour today. How many grandchildren so you have?
Gillian Duffy: Two. They've just come back from Australia where they've been stuck for nine, 10 days with this ash crisis.
Gordon Brown: But they got through now? Yeah we've been trying to get people back quickly. But are they going to go to university? That's the plan?
Gillian Duffy: I hope so. They're only 12 and 10.
Gordon Brown: Oh they're only 12 and 10. But they're doing well at school?
Gillian Duffy: Yeah yeah, very good.
Gordon Brown: A good family. Good to see you.
Gillian Duffy: Yeah. And the education system in Rochdale - I will congratulate it.
Gordon Brown: Good. And it's very nice to see you. Take care. Good to see you all. Thanks very much.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 17:56 (fifteen years ago)
Oh-er.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 17:57 (fifteen years ago)
Damn it - you had her at that point you bloody blundering buffoon!
Well, that's kind of it - reasonable interaction, yet he comes away cursing it for being a disaster. Quite revealing imo. If he'd ever had to campaign before, he might've been more realistic about it.
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 18:00 (fifteen years ago)
the reason is that indigenous is 'occurring naturally in an area or environment' whereas autocthonous though often used identically shd be simply 'originating where found' ie nonracial in this context - a lot of the people described aren't 'indigenous' rochdale types
but well done for alighting on such a crucial point
If your working classes are costing too much, import more and keep the pay low.THen get them to blame each other!
i guess
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 18:06 (fifteen years ago)
autocthonous
Well, at least I've learn a new word to-day - so not a complete washout.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)
How's it pronounced though?
that wd be awwwwtokfunus, in a rochdale accent
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)
Meanwhile, Cheggers weighs in:
Gordon Browns Team are on to that pensioner. In 3 hours we'll find out shes a terrorist, benefits cheat & Jedward fan
Can see why he's not on telly anymore.
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)
I win arguments w/ rochdale pensioners all the time
― ogmor, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 18:20 (fifteen years ago)
i don't agree w. nakhchivan that immigration was (consciously) mandated with the intention of divide-and-rule among the working class, but the way tracer was only able to say, basically, "that's racist" at the very idea of talking about it is sort of typical. i mean plainly, nakh was *dying* to use the word indigenous (it's just that he, um, didn't) -- but still, is it not a topic where you can talk about causes, decision-making, etc.? (obviously this too must be a leading question and i must be put under suspicion. to try and allay this, my mum is a quarter not-autocthonous, and dad was born in kenya -- but we keep that quiet, it would interfere with his job.)
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:24 (fifteen years ago)
hang on, no, *i'm* a quarter not-autocthonous.
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:25 (fifteen years ago)
Mrs Duffy now (allegedly) being represented by Bell Pottinger and offered £50k by The Sun (or £75k from the Mail - or whatever figure you can pluck out of the air) for her story, maybe.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:28 (fifteen years ago)
I felt quite sorry for her when I saw the clip where they told her Brown had been talking about her afterwards - her eyes lit up and she was all excited, then they played her *that*
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)
xposts When the first 'recruited' immigrants came to Britain post-WWII they were all from colonies or former colonies, yes? A lot of British-born workers were simply not there - two world wars killed an awful lot of working class men. If immigration was mandated by anything it was the massive amount of infrastructure jobs that needed filling - and there were not enough people here to fill them. The immigrants had an expectation that they were equal to anyone in the 'mother country'.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:35 (fifteen years ago)
I thought we'd already heard her story ffs
― g.w.f.nagl (cozen), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, what else does she have to say, Jesus, she's probably going to be like International Terrorism Rentaquote Expert John Smeaton or some shit now.
― ailsa, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)
i don't agree w. nakhchivan that immigration was (consciously) mandated with the intention of divide-and-rule among the working class, but the way tracer was only able to say, basically, "that's racist"
errr fairly sure tracer was just calling out the word choice as pretentious, which it kinda was, but there is a subtle difference in meaning
i mean plainly, nakh was *dying* to use the word indigenous (it's just that he, um, didn't)
wtf? if i wanted to mean indigenous then i'd have used it
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:40 (fifteen years ago)
Bell Pottinger, the PR agency run by Lord Bell, who got his peerage for doing Thatcher's poster campaigns? Who lost all their government work post-1997? Bunch of fuckers.
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)
xpost Yeah, that's not fair. We don't know what words people are dying to use, because we can't read their minds. Almost as much fun as being told what you think.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)
she's probably going to be like International Terrorism Rentaquote Expert John Smeaton or some shit now.
Think this is the only way Brown's going to come out of this ok, if she turns into such a mouthy horror that people lose any sympathy for her.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)
well it was a bit of both tbh but i think i was unfair
(jesus who put me in this thread, that was a disaster)
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)
yes, im aware of the history. and the colonies had provided armies for the brits to defend the empire with, so there was that too. ww2 didn't really kill that many brits (compared to ww1), but a lot of brits disappeared in the late forties (lot of my family went to NZ, shudder), and there was a labour shortage. and this was a period when both parties believed in full employment -- neither do now. then successive tory and labour governments removed those rights -- was that racist, or is it not really feasible to offer citizenship without conditions? does a free market in labour benefit the rich north? idk, not really for this thread, but my point is, these are real questions, not things you should call racist immediately, which i think is what brown did, on slightly different terrain.
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, April 28, 2010 8:40 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark
yeah i know i was being sarcastic at tracer's expense there.
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)
if she turns into such a mouthy horror that people lose any sympathy for her.
the joe the plumber effect
― g.w.f.nagl (cozen), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)
xposts, yeah, like that woman who was all "oh noes, his handwriting's shite and it looks like he spelled my son's name wrong" and everyone was all "oh shut up, at least he's writing you a condolence letter personally, wtf is wrong with you people". John Smeaton still has a column in, I think, the Scottish Sun, for some reason.
― ailsa, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)
did u srsly think that sentence was racist?
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)
The Sun pays Smeato £100 a week for his column, which might explain why they're still running it
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)
you only get £62.50 a week on bennos and I'm sure his column takes less time to write than a job-hunting diary so not a bad deal for smeato I think
― g.w.f.nagl (cozen), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)
Presumably they also pay someone else to write it though.
― ailsa, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
Jesus: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/8649398.stm
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)
"Got David C on the FB"
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)
"all these eastern Europeans what are coming in, where are they flocking from?"
Er, Eastern Europe?
― Chris, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:21 (fifteen years ago)
nakhchivan the concept of autochthonicism - which basically, yes, just means indigenous - has served pretty much only racist agendas, to the point that it's pretty useless as a category for thinking about how things actually work outside the minds of racists but no i didn't think your sentence was racist, or that you are racist, and i hold your shoes blameless as well
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:25 (fifteen years ago)
(*whew* god what a bigot)
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)
anyone know the name of the two gleeful reporters who interviewed GD in the aftermath?
― g.w.f.nagl (cozen), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:39 (fifteen years ago)
nakhchivan the concept of autochthonicism - which basically, yes, just means indigenous - has served pretty much only racist agendas, to the point that it's pretty useless as a category for thinking about how things actually work outside the minds of racists
what term would you use for the purpose? is it always racist to control immigration, in any country, given that to do so favours the __________ population over the non-__________ population?
("__________" meaning autochthonous or whatever.)
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)
non-immigrant over the non-non-immigrant obv
― joe, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 22:01 (fifteen years ago)
non-__________ non-population, technically
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 22:03 (fifteen years ago)
Genuinely upset that Brown wasted the gaffe of his life on some old lady and not, I dunno, Berlusconi or someone.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 22:17 (fifteen years ago)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8650411.stm
Brilliant work here Labour. A+++ day of campaigning.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 22:19 (fifteen years ago)
See it's just a word! Things, people that are already somewhere. I like it probably because it makes me think of Lovecraft, the crazy old fuck.
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)
lovecraft was a racist though
― joe, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 22:24 (fifteen years ago)
that was the joke!
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 22:27 (fifteen years ago)
Nonetheless we do need a nonweird, nonpretentious word bereft of ethnic, biological connotations to describe things, people that are already somewhere. Nominations accepted.
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 22:30 (fifteen years ago)
duh sry
― joe, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 22:31 (fifteen years ago)
you can leave aside nakhchivan's 'divide&conquer' conspiracy, but decisions on immigration are taken by bodies that are [at least felt to be] unrepresentative of groups such as rochdale pensioners, & that aggravates perceived fuck ups. race can feed into those perceptions, but there are other components, & I don't think being reluctant to open the issue up to discussion is a good thing
― ogmor, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 22:40 (fifteen years ago)
To return to my first post....
i don't agree w. nakhchivan that immigration was (consciously) mandated with the intention of divide-and-rule among the working class
Nor me! As I said, vaguely aware. I'm not sure how useful conscious/unconscious is in understanding these things. The relevant ministers and permanent secretaries probably didn't sit around together and decide to fuck over the lower orders, but they didn't have to, institutions of state have their own procedures and rationalizations to avoid such unpleasantness. And there was a need for labour after all.
If immigration was mandated by anything it was the massive amount of infrastructure jobs that needed filling - and there were not enough people here to fill them. The immigrants had an expectation that they were equal to anyone in the 'mother country'.
That's true from what I remember reading in the desparately sad accounts of early immigrants, it shows how the architects of Empire could simultaneously foment racism at home and love from the colonial subjects.
And the contempt at home was pretty extreme, eg people like Rachman (who I'm told was 'a clever rascal, but not such a bad man') making a fortune from blockbusting because the residents of poorer neighbourhoods wouldn't want even to live in proximity to black people, there were race riots etc. Somehow I doubt this would have been a surprise to the Government unless they believed that commending the colonies' contribution in WWII would override the paeans to conquest and dehumanization that had fed the domestic market for decades. There was probably some Atlee era liberal naivete too.
This coincides with the end of the Raj and the postwar settlement being accepted by most of the elite as a necessary concession. There would have been a sense of the loss of Empire (however expensive an encumbrence at that point) initiating a decline in productivity, but the newly redundant Colonial Officers would have known how useful transferring labour around the world could be, both economically and as in East Africa where the South Asian merchant class diverted the resentment of the peasants, a useful distraction.
Working class political opposition at home was feckless, with the far-right being marginalized by its associations with continental fascism and Labour being supportive of immigration and (notionally) of the equality of peoples etc. After Enoch Powell even the Conservative Party had to conceal much of its racism.
The good side of this is that there's a lot less racism than there used to be.
Eventually large-scale unskilled immigration became naturalized to the extent that Govts of all parties have an endless supply of biddable indigents and the only consolation for working class resentment (short of joining the neofascists and becoming pariahs) is the sort of futile 'bloody x, coming over here and taking our jobs' shit we saw today, though many of them seem to believe there is a double bind whereby they're 'not allowed to say that'.
This is of course an extremely tendentious, Adam Curtisish reading of things, but the benefits to all classes of unskilled/semiskilled immigration have been noted often enough elsewhere. Naturally I approve of immigration of all types at current levels or greater, though I don't think we should expect everyone to be happy about it.
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 23:32 (fifteen years ago)
i don't think it's adam curtis-y or anything, just that there are no "architects of empire". there's the endless struggle to maintain power, but the idea of "divide and rule" as nefarious policy assumes that the natural order is unity, which it plainly was not in india.
again, the british colonists in africa (or the caribbean) didn't bring in south asian administrators to divert resentment.
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 23:51 (fifteen years ago)
They didn't bring in merchants, but the labourers became merchants, and that became useful for many reasons (the timeline somewhat longer than my post wd indicate but Jesus it was long enough as it)
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 23:57 (fifteen years ago)
-was
http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content/StaticFile/jpg/2010/Apr/Week4/15621981.jpg
― Chris de Burgin' (King Boy Pato), Thursday, 29 April 2010 07:36 (fifteen years ago)
This is the winner, through:
http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content/StaticFile/jpg/2010/Apr/Week4/15621967.jpg
― Chris de Burgin' (King Boy Pato), Thursday, 29 April 2010 07:46 (fifteen years ago)
http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content/StaticFile/jpg/2010/Apr/Week4/15621990.jpg
― Chris de Burgin' (King Boy Pato), Thursday, 29 April 2010 07:48 (fifteen years ago)
Fantastic Express editorialising:
n the most extraordinary gaffe in British election history, the Prime Minister branded grandmother Gillian Duffy “bigoted” simply for raising concerns about mass immigration, benefit scroungers, pensions and spiralling Government debt.“That was a disaster. You should never have put me near that woman,” Mr Brown was overheard telling aides. “She is just a sort of bigoted woman.”The remark swiftly sparked a political firestorm, forcing the Labour leader to make a cringing and humiliating public apology to Mrs Duffy. The episode was immediately reported by news outlets across the world, embarrassing the whole nation and bringing shame to the office of Prime Minister. Mr Brown’s sneering remarks were made in his chauffeur-driven car just seconds after a polite exchange of views with Mrs Duffy – previously a life-long Labour supporter – during a walkabout in Rochdale, Lancashire.
“That was a disaster. You should never have put me near that woman,” Mr Brown was overheard telling aides. “She is just a sort of bigoted woman.”
The remark swiftly sparked a political firestorm, forcing the Labour leader to make a cringing and humiliating public apology to Mrs Duffy. The episode was immediately reported by news outlets across the world, embarrassing the whole nation and bringing shame to the office of Prime Minister. Mr Brown’s sneering remarks were made in his chauffeur-driven car just seconds after a polite exchange of views with Mrs Duffy – previously a life-long Labour supporter – during a walkabout in Rochdale, Lancashire.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 29 April 2010 07:50 (fifteen years ago)
The real hypocrisy is that Nick Griffin is on R4 right now and NOBODY is calling him a racist, or even a bigot.
AAAAARGH that stupid, adenoidal fascist motherfucker. Straight-up said there was a difference between Albanians and 'Somalians' and nice normal French and Irish people who want to come here to live.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 07:51 (fifteen years ago)
― nakhchivan, Thursday, April 29, 2010 12:57 AM (8 hours ago) Bookmark
wait what? p sure there were south asian traders in east africa before the brits were even in south asia, let alone africa. not rly sure what you're getting at: populations move; the world trades; economic, political, and social arrangements are unequal, sure, yes. the brits took a bigger piece of this pie than most but it wasn't a conspiracy in which they held all the cards.
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 08:02 (fifteen years ago)
Well, I guess today's "Debate" will put this on the back burner...
― Mark G, Thursday, 29 April 2010 08:18 (fifteen years ago)
kind of out of the frying pan there
problem with this debate is that it's in none of their interests to tell the truth and the format is kind to them
― rolling stupid fruity crazy frog (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 08:33 (fifteen years ago)
Unless Dimbleby goes "rogue".
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Thursday, 29 April 2010 08:52 (fifteen years ago)
There were definitely Asian traders in East Africa - one of the most successful immigrant groups in the UK are diaspora Asians from Uganda (to the point where other Asians checking for byline poshness and the like delight in pointing out which of the great and good originated there).
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:03 (fifteen years ago)
And Kenya of course
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:09 (fifteen years ago)
Brighton Pavilion looking good for the Greens if the bookies are anything to go by.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:09 (fifteen years ago)
Such is the way of the world. There I was thinking how the colonial civil services would usually establish/support hierarchies of ethnicity/caste etc, even artifically by allowing migration among the colonies. There was often internecine discord and violence but the colonialists seldom saw the worst of it. There was probably less determinism than I suggested but probably more than your 'shit happens' suggests too. And yeah East Africa had obviously been a trading centre for long before the Europeans got there.
That said I don't really believe this was all some great conspiracy, rather that decisions on immigration were made without any great concern for the lower classes then as now, and nobody really gives a fuck. As with most liberal ish people it's never really bothered me but it's worth having a look at.
The history of the end of imperialism, the withdrawal from India especially seems interesting and I'll try and read about it properly sometime, like how much colonial thought influenced domestic policy in the early postwar era. Not really related but this quote by Macaulay cribbed off Wikipedia is amazing;
"I have travelled across the length and breadth of India and I have not seen one person who is a beggar, who is a thief. Such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such caliber, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage, and, therefore, I propose that we replace the old and ancient education system, her culture, because if the Indians think that all that is foreign and English is good and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native self-culture and they will become what we want them to be, a truly dominated nation."
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:15 (fifteen years ago)
Kenyan Asians were not expelled from the country as happened under Amin in Uganda, correct?
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:17 (fifteen years ago)
Not expelled but sort of forced out under Kenyatta? Certainly left in large numbers.
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:18 (fifteen years ago)
There's (South) Asians everywhere in the old British Empire: the Caribbean, Middle East, South Africa, the rest of Asia
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:20 (fifteen years ago)
I suppose there's quite a lot of them to go round though
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:21 (fifteen years ago)
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:52 (25 minutes ago) Bookmark
Bullingdon ties and all that. Paxman would have been much more interesting.
― tomofthenest, Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:21 (fifteen years ago)
There I was thinking how the colonial civil services would usually establish/support hierarchies of ethnicity/caste etc, even artifically by allowing migration among the colonies.
yeah i'll 'llow that it's not a "shit happens" scenario. but "artificial" how? is migration within the british empire different from all the other migrations going on during the imperial age, e.g. from arabia into africa?
that macauley quote is amazing, pretty incredible. the first brits (ie for 300 years before wellesley, really, im told) did not think in those terms, though in it to win it (it being $$$, not souls) they certainly were.
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:24 (fifteen years ago)
In 1960s, several thousand Indians fled Kenya for the United Kingdom due to discriminatory practices by the ruling government. Since that time relations have improved slowly.
My best friend as a kid was of that upper mid Ugandan Asian background. Very liberal but almost patrician at times in that VS Naipaul kinda way.
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:24 (fifteen years ago)
The traditional practice of Empires was usually to establish trading posts on the coastline but the British extended far into the hinterlands and needed labourers to build railways etc. These things wouldn't have happened without the Empire.
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:31 (fifteen years ago)
Griffin: ''The Irish as far as we're concerned are part of Britain''
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:44 (fifteen years ago)
want to hear him weigh in on the manx
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:53 (fifteen years ago)
how does Nick Griffin feel about Spanish oranges in Tesco, is what I want to know
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:55 (fifteen years ago)
what's his take on israeli basil
― g.w.f.nagl (cozen), Thursday, 29 April 2010 09:57 (fifteen years ago)
When the list of members was leaked last year it revealed a member in my street. Their flyer dropped through my door yesterday, his rancid grill prominently featured as their candidate.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:04 (fifteen years ago)
Griffin using the false claim that 'Britain is the most overcrowded country in Europe'
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:08 (fifteen years ago)
Britain and England are the same thing to him
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:11 (fifteen years ago)
BNP offers £50k to leave britain
― g.w.f.nagl (cozen), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:15 (fifteen years ago)
done!
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:16 (fifteen years ago)
do you remember, a few days ago, when everyone was all gordon needs to spend more time with people who don't support him
― Earning your Masters in Library and Information Science is beautiful (schlump), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:18 (fifteen years ago)
Presumably the BNP think we should give Gibraltar back to Spain? And repatriate all those retired bank robbers living on the Costas?
― Sub/Doms Whipping Here (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:19 (fifteen years ago)
He just need to avoid spending time with people who DO support him! (xp)
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:19 (fifteen years ago)
That whole thing would cost 9 billion pounds per year? To be funded by "the money we're wasting on ridiculous climate change adaptation policies"? Hello?
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:21 (fifteen years ago)
don't get why ur cock blocking my £50k nick
― g.w.f.nagl (cozen), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:24 (fifteen years ago)
With that same £9B we could place Nick Griffin in a rocket and shoot him at Mars, Beagle-style, for Harry, St. George and England yada yada.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:29 (fifteen years ago)
Toxic environmental situation sorted, IMO.
What's the story behind those Brighton Pavilion odds? (many xposts)
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:32 (fifteen years ago)
Might have to hire a Japanese physicist for that though.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:33 (fifteen years ago)
He admits that clever foreign people can be useful though, even ones who aren't white
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:34 (fifteen years ago)
listening now, he really hasn't thought this through, has he?
― tomofthenest, Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:37 (fifteen years ago)
he was so transparently full-of-shit this morning.
― went ham in a bad way (stevie), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:38 (fifteen years ago)
^^ that's what's amazing about the looney parties. how hard is it to come up with their batshit fantasies? not very, you'd have thought, but still they get tied in knots.
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:39 (fifteen years ago)
What's the story behind those Brighton Pavilion odds?
Caroline Lucas talking a good game and the Lib Dems have been historically very weak here, so the Greens are the obvious alternative. Also the Green vote has been getting stronger and stronger in all polls over the last decade.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:43 (fifteen years ago)
I'm Irish and discovering that Nick Griffin wants to include me is just horrible.
― sonofstan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:45 (fifteen years ago)
Still SMH at lack of 'you're a racist WRT immigration issues' when faced with an official bigot on the airwaves.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:49 (fifteen years ago)
Reunification of Britain and Ireland has been in their manifesto for years. Given how likely the Irish are to be be enthusiastic about it, that can only mean one thing...
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:52 (fifteen years ago)
Trying to work out if "Nick Griffin, how do you feel about the Irish" was a top-quality "when did you stop beating your wife" question or if Mr Griffin just turned it into one
― xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:53 (fifteen years ago)
Souness married an Irishwoman, let's not forget
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Thursday, 29 April 2010 10:59 (fifteen years ago)
£50k? Bloody foreigners, going there, taking our benefits.
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:12 (fifteen years ago)
50k...and how long would it take for the average person to cop that in benefits, healthcare costs etc.?
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:16 (fifteen years ago)
a couple of weeks?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1076885/Pictured-Inside-luxury-1-2m-council-house--complete-50-inch-plasma-TV.html
― broad layering (onimo), Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:20 (fifteen years ago)
The folks of Barking are going to be so happy to hear that their local BNP candidate wants to stop funding their flood defences.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:23 (fifteen years ago)
They're using immigrants as flood defences? Outrageous
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:24 (fifteen years ago)
Sorry that was referring to "the money we're wasting on ridiculous climate change adaptation policies"
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:25 (fifteen years ago)
Was thinking, it sounded like quite a BNP-friendly scheme, that.
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:31 (fifteen years ago)
That plasma is never 50 inches.
― JimD, Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:33 (fifteen years ago)
measured diagonally, it might be.
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:35 (fifteen years ago)
Aye there's either some weird foreshortening going on or that's a 32" telly.
― broad layering (onimo), Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:35 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe her and the kids are GIANT asylum seekers.
― broad layering (onimo), Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:36 (fifteen years ago)
Nonsense, you could build a dyke with that tv.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:39 (fifteen years ago)
http://tweetphoto.com/20350722
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:39 (fifteen years ago)
A 50 inch diagonal tv should be about 30 inches high. A wii is about 8 inches tall...so yeah, maybe that does add up actually. But it looks very odd. Living room must be huge.
― JimD, Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:41 (fifteen years ago)
you get a lot of bang for your taxpayer's buck
― broad layering (onimo), Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:42 (fifteen years ago)
ilxors say the darndest things.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:49 (fifteen years ago)
A lot of Bang and Olufsen, that is!
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:52 (fifteen years ago)
:D
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 29 April 2010 11:54 (fifteen years ago)
Nick Griffin usually comes across as a slow-witted fantasist and the 'Japanese scientists' invoked as if plucked randomly from his mental firnament are a telltale sign of fascist pathology and his weird fetishes;
"Pride in one's own race - and that does not imply contempt for other races - is also a normal and healthy sentiment. I have never regarded the Chinese or the Japanese as being inferior to ourselves. They belong to ancient civilizations, and I admit freely that their past history is superior to our own. They have the right to be proud of their past, just as we have the right to be proud of the civilization to which we belong. Indeed, I believe the more steadfast the Chinese and the Japanese remain in their pride of race, the easier I shall find it to get on with them."
That's the cunt from the hilarious 'Downfall' parody videos but same difference, in other volkisch pandering news.....
Meeting factory workers in Halesowen ahead of the debate on Thursday, Mr Brown was again challenged on immigration by an employee who told him it was "way too high".Mr Brown said: "I understand the worries people have about immigration, I understand the concerns about what is happening to people, neighbourhoods, and I understand the fears that people have.""But we have taken action with this new points system and net migration to the United Kingdom is now coming down."He also told workers: "Yesterday was yesterday, today I want to talk about the future of the economy."
Mr Brown said: "I understand the worries people have about immigration, I understand the concerns about what is happening to people, neighbourhoods, and I understand the fears that people have."
"But we have taken action with this new points system and net migration to the United Kingdom is now coming down."
He also told workers: "Yesterday was yesterday, today I want to talk about the future of the economy."
So yeah his attempts to foreclose his intriguing dialogue with assembled tabard people are kinda transparent but symptomatic of a universal political recursion in which 'Let's have a debate about immigration' ends up as 'Let's have a debate about immigration' ad infinitum.
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:10 (fifteen years ago)
Why would the main parties bother 'having a debate about immigration' when the electorate, no matter what they might say to pollsters, don't seem to vote strongly on it?
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:18 (fifteen years ago)
Immigration is not out of control in this country - as any migrant coming in can tell you. The rhetoric of this debate is disgusting and full of inflammatory but ultimatelty meaningless language. Most people who have misgivings about immigrants for neighbours (and possible competitors for benefits and housing and jobs) *are* misguided at the minimum. Politicians have not been about guiding the misguided here, for the most part - there are too many votes to pander for when people decide they don't like their neighbours. For example, the wage depression people cite could be avoided if a) people communicated with each other about 'going rates' and b) EU immigrants especially asserted themselves when wage differentials are discovered. The thing that's done for the working people of this country is the casualization of pretty much all their employment options - no wonder they feel so insecure, but it's their employers' fault for diminishing any return for anyone who isn't a shareholder.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:23 (fifteen years ago)
And how could the electorate vote strongly on it if they wanted to? They probably have the sense to realize that however much they play political catenaccio with it, none of the main parties really share their discontent and they don't want to vote for Nazis. (xp)
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:23 (fifteen years ago)
LOL, he's like a toddler or something:
"Gordon Brown does not seem to have learned enough from the unplanned broadcast of his comments about Gillian Duffy, the BBC's Carole Walker says. He failed to take his radio microphone off again after a brief walkabout in Manchester at the end of a day dominated by his unguarded comments. This time the camera crew stopped him to remove it before he said much more"
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:24 (fifteen years ago)
After Sky's successful lobbying for debates I think for the next election they should fight for all three party leaders to be miked up for all waking hours for the entirety of the campaign, and for all three to be streamed live to the public.
― broad layering (onimo), Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:27 (fifteen years ago)
Ach, I can spot that Brown must have been bullied at school or something, it's so obvious with how he now behaves. Are they putting the mic on his blind side?
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:28 (fifteen years ago)
there are too many votes to pander for when people decide they don't like their neighbours.
Not even their neighbours, sure I read about a poll recently that showed that anti-immigration feeling was often higher in places with less immigrants. You see it all the time, when they interview people in places like Stoke, where there's actually been a lot less immigration than similar towns and ciies.
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:30 (fifteen years ago)
Suzy you're of course correct. There used to be, at least in the early 00s, a sizeable difference between the two parties, but now if an honest (yes) Conservative gets asked about immigration they'll give some variant on 'good for the economy'. George Osborne might organize a few Potemkin Village photoshoots of Eritreans getting deported for the Nazi press but the numbers won't be much different.
This is a more minor version of the cross-party consensus on fiduciary mendacity in which everyone intends to do more or less the same thing and they might as well all lie about it.
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)
Most people who have misgivings about immigrants for neighbours (and possible competitors for benefits and housing and jobs) *are* misguided at the minimum. [...] For example, the wage depression people cite could be avoided if a) people communicated with each other about 'going rates' and b) EU immigrants especially asserted themselves when wage differentials are discovered.
well hang on, they aren't misguided about competition for jobs if the second bit is to make sense. and tbh it's not classy to say that the people who want to talk about it have a problem with immigrants "as neighbours" -- again it's a way of bringing racism into the question when it isn't always fair to. as for state resources -- schools, hospitals, policing -- given that there was poor planning for the level of post-2004 immigration from the EU, there probably is some space for rational discourse on how the government manages immigration w/r/t infrastructure in the future. it's a practical issue for people who work in education/health, anyway, and again, they aren't "misguided at the minimum" for talking about it.
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:45 (fifteen years ago)
Not so sure about it being under control, actually. There appear to be two categories of immigrants, the first governed by the points system and legal routes, and the second being people who enter and just disappear. The system is set up to hammer those in the first category, because they're the only ones who can be controlled - the tribunals are full of people appealing against deportation orders made on the most technical of grounds. Action can't be taken against those in the second category, because no-one knows anything about them.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:53 (fifteen years ago)
I guess EU workers are a third category, though I don't really think of them as immigrants at all.
Action can't be taken against those in the second category, because no-one knows anything about them
I'm sure the wonderful small and other businessmen that employ them know more than they are letting on
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:55 (fifteen years ago)
^^^Yeah, here's betting the people that do dodgy hires are more likely Tories.
I was going for the most encompassing term I could muster because fear of the unknown, or the lesser-known, is what animates people's insecurity and is definitely part of the racist/bigot continuum. Words like 'flood' when used by the Gillians we know is a pretty solid marker on someone who hasn't thought deeply or looked beyond standard-issue words to describe a situation they find unpleasant. People who *don't* have a problem with immigrants tend to focus on powerful people manipulating the less-powerful into hate and jealousy as the real reason for their dissatisfaction w/government.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:56 (fifteen years ago)
I have a bunch of problems with explanations that rely on the "stupid" being manipulated by the "clever" tho. Or most old school False Consciousness theories, really.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:59 (fifteen years ago)
Which party supports cutting back on Australian working holidaymakers btw?
― Chris de Burgin' (King Boy Pato), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:07 (fifteen years ago)
Scousers?
― Mark G, Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:09 (fifteen years ago)
Australia as far as we're concerned is part of Britain
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:11 (fifteen years ago)
No Islams either.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:12 (fifteen years ago)
I know you all think Australians are cute and whatnot, but I think you'd notice a much better level of service if your local Walkabout was staffed with Poles.
― Chris de Burgin' (King Boy Pato), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:15 (fifteen years ago)
I think I'd notice if I started visiting my local Walkabout, because it would mean a general slippage in standards on my part.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:18 (fifteen years ago)
If you go into a Walkabout you don't deserve the vote IMO.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:18 (fifteen years ago)
I think I'd notice if I started visiting my local Walkabout because it would be mean that I'd been magically transformed overnight into an Australian, New Zealander or South African
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:19 (fifteen years ago)
We have to make do with a Barracuda in Hull. It's like Walkabout without the fist-fights.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)
if your local Walkabout was staffed with Poles.
Maybe they could be rebranded as Warsawkabout.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)
You mean there's actually a pub in Hull with no fist-fights?
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:22 (fifteen years ago)
"GODDAMMIT THESE AREN'T THE POLE DANCERS I MEANT"
http://txvolkstanz.org/mazurka/mazurka.jpg
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)
That was a good joke to Krakow imo.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:24 (fifteen years ago)
I've got Lodz more where that came from
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:24 (fifteen years ago)
^ bastard, beat me to it my a millisecond!
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:25 (fifteen years ago)
^^ Suggest Brańsk.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:25 (fifteen years ago)
Hope we're not going Torun with this line of bad puns.
― broad layering (onimo), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:26 (fifteen years ago)
Polish drinkers would be welcome as long as they didn't Lech at the barmaids.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)
Horse walks into a Polish Walkabout. Barman says "Wajda long face?"
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:28 (fifteen years ago)
It's murder on Gdansk-floor.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:29 (fifteen years ago)
... no idea how you actually pronounce Wajda, I confess
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:29 (fifteen years ago)
G'dansk, cobber.
― tomofthenest, Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:30 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe Gordon needs to speak to some actual Polish immigrants, get input from a real Bydgoszcz woman.
― the big pink suede panda bear hurts (ledge), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:33 (fifteen years ago)
just don't think he deals very well with the working class elderly. he should try speaking to a poznań instead
― tomofthenest, Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:37 (fifteen years ago)
I reckon he'd do better to talk to young mums and families in general, he should get himself down to the nearest Chopin centte
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:39 (fifteen years ago)
They don't really apply to this situation right now which seems to be simple agonism. If working class people are bothered about competition for jobs/housing/services then that's simple self interest, they might be wrong but they're not entirely delusional. Even if a lot the shit about how immigrants are actively favoured is incorrect, they are still competing for resources.
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:48 (fifteen years ago)
Eastrn European speaks: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/29/gillian-duffy-eastern-european
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:03 (fifteen years ago)
I am writing this because realistically it's the only way that I can get any leverage on the situation without landing myself in jail.
That's such a terrible article, some fucking idiot in Rochdale has a lack of grace with metaphor and she dissolves into fanonist/suffragette fantasies.
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:18 (fifteen years ago)
It's a tad hysterical
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:22 (fifteen years ago)
she comes off a bit mentally ill.
― Times New Excels At (jim in glasgow), Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:24 (fifteen years ago)
What the hell is wrong with The Guardian, publishing that crap?
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:27 (fifteen years ago)
it's self-aggrandizing rubbish. i live with some1 who is currently under threat of deportation, weeks before the exams he's been here studying for for two years. he's dealing with it just a little better than this dame deals with the shocking news that someone in britain has a mild problem with large-scale immigration.
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:28 (fifteen years ago)
desperate attempt to make Bigotgate not *all* bad for Labour
― broad layering (onimo), Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:28 (fifteen years ago)
Bloody East Europeans coming here and stealing our Guardian columns
― Zelda Zonk, Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:30 (fifteen years ago)
I'm sorry her problems are not sufficiently grave for you to recognize, much less respect. What's wrong with empathizing with both this woman and your flatmate?
My reading was that she wasn't shocked that people felt like that, but was upset that nobody spoke up for immigrants. She is perfectly entitled to her anger about this! I thought it was a much-needed POV and YES it sucks when people don't defend migrants from this shit, especially in the media.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:33 (fifteen years ago)
some fucking idiot in Rochdale has a lack of grace with metaphor
He is the Prime Minister tbf.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:36 (fifteen years ago)
I would suggest that her various lef/liberal Twitterati friends are a bunch of twunts, because there was plenty of criticism levelled at Mrs Duffy here, f'rinstance
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:37 (fifteen years ago)
There needs to be people speaking up for immigrants but the Guardian appointing some cataleptic concern troll to speak for all the subalterns is not the way to do it.
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:39 (fifteen years ago)
this thread became tl;dr since i last bookmarked it but i just need to say LOL indie cover.
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:42 (fifteen years ago)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3395/4562643155_13d503352d_o.png
Hmm.
― caek, Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:47 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/04/uk-seats-projection-tories-299-labour.html
11% of nonvoters are lib dem? or 8%? idgi
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:49 (fifteen years ago)
120 would be pretty epochal for the LDs, but lab couldn't form a coalition with a majority if that happened
― caek, Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:50 (fifteen years ago)
their prediction is 11% of people who didn't vote in 05 will vote lib dem
i think
― caek, Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:51 (fifteen years ago)
I think she's OTM, broadly.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)
ooh the cheeky bigot-bashing buffoon
http://www.bbc.co.uk/home/features/d/content/images/2010/04/28/debate_strap_1a_626x274.jpg
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 29 April 2010 15:11 (fifteen years ago)
clegg a candidate for this facial expression
― joe, Thursday, 29 April 2010 15:12 (fifteen years ago)
"I'd forget my head if it wasn't screwed, next thing you know I'll be leaving a Sky radio mike on while insult a pensioner"
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 15:12 (fifteen years ago)
history mayne consider using 'damsel' more
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 29 April 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)
did i write "damsel"?! a+ if so
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)
Haven't read the 538 article yet (they were very good for Obama/McCain) but if I plug their vote-share figures into the BBC parliament predictor I get 272-253-96 (Tories 54 short of a majority). But I suspect the BBC thing is based on universal swing and 538 have done something subtler.
― Michael Jones, Thursday, 29 April 2010 15:19 (fifteen years ago)
That's pretty much what the article says. 538 seems far more plausible to me. I also wonder whether targetted campaigning should harvest another couple of dozen seats, seeing as only the Tories can really afford it.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 29 April 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)
i think the big flaw (which my not actually compromise their results) is they rely on regional polling data. in an ideal world this is better than assuming a uniform swing, but i'm not sure the regional data is very good.
― caek, Thursday, 29 April 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)
Does 40% of the 2005 labour vote defecting or not voting seem a lot to anyone else?
― caek, Thursday, 29 April 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)
had to endure a long rant about Brown and dirty 'eastern europeans' who prostitute children etc... from the guy cleaning the close just now.
― Gee, Officer (Gukbe), Thursday, 29 April 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)
Then again, there was that YouGov thing a couple of weeks back examining the second rank of Lab-Con marginals showing that the Tories were well short of making the gains that a uniform national swing (based on the polls of the time) would suggest. Which doesn't necessarily disagree with 538's model but there's seems a good chance (or just a hope) that a 9% nationwide switch of 2005-election Lab voters to the Tories does not net the Tories anywhere near all the marginal seats covered by such a swing.
It's anybody's, Brian.
― Michael Jones, Thursday, 29 April 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)
Is there any way the Tories can win a majority without taking seats off the LibDems? Because I just can't see that happening to any great degree and surely there are a lot of Labour marginals that are much more likely to go yellow than blue?
― Matt DC, Thursday, 29 April 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)
'had to endure a long rant about Brown and dirty 'eastern europeans' who prostitute children etc... from the guy cleaning the close just now.'
new Daz ad
― Jarlrmai, Thursday, 29 April 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)
I do not understand the need to reach for the high-shelf words to insult this contributor - perhaps a woman made a point in public and it could not go by unsnarked? - but congratulations on 'cataleptic' and 50 new IQ points 4U.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)
Just remembered the existence of the yogic flying Natural Law Party. Do we have any similarly batshit parties this time round? Apart from UKIP that is.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)
Do we have any similarly batshit parties this time round?
'Raymond Allerston, who represents the remnants of the Social Democratic Party, tells the Daily Politics his party is very different to the Liberal Democrats, who were formed when most of the SDP agreed to merge with the Liberal Party. "The Lib Dems have the wrong policies. They're more for going in for Europe which we disagree with," he says. When it is pointed out that the party's founders David Owen, Shirley Williams and Roy Jenkins were pro-European, the candidate for East Yorkshire replies: "This is a new SDP with fresh people."'
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fancy_Dress_Party
― broad layering (onimo), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)
http://newbloodart.com/uploads/preview/ec39a7-gordon-blair.jpg
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)
http://newbloodart.com/uploads/preview/6a74a2-nick-clegg.jpg
http://newbloodart.com/uploads/preview/419116-david-cameron.jpg
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:37 (fifteen years ago)
http://newbloodart.com/uploads/preview/3da902-nick-griffin.jpg
How on earth did they manage to make that picture of Clegg look so much like a racist caricature?
― Matt DC, Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)
Nick is yours for 20 nicker
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:39 (fifteen years ago)
Least strange pic of Gordon Brown for a while...
― Mark G, Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
The pudgy punchability of Cameron has been well rendered though
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)
looks a bit Prince William
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)
Seperated at birth?
http://newbloodart.com/uploads/preview/ec39a7-gordon-blair.jpghttp://www.lubd.co.th/html/images/about_bkk/only/p_02.jpg
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:52 (fifteen years ago)
Has anyone mentioned these jokers yet?
Citizens for Undead Rights and Equality. LOL ZOMBIES.
― emil.y, Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)
I found the winner of the Tory remixes:
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/comment/7/2010/04/0b4c7982758e9d8dfa10c1e6e599f93c/original.jpg
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:17 (fifteen years ago)
perhaps a woman made a point in public and it could not go by unsnarked?
don't think this is a woman thing. it's more a guardian CIF thing. barely coherent thoughts on the front page of the guardian site don't get a pass because "this is how i felt about some stuff, just sayin'". this article is no worse than most of them though, sure.
― caek, Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)
When guys who are trying to win the Will Self Vocabulary Prize 2010 select the word 'hysterical' from the myriad critical adjectives available, and it's applied to a GURL, I am somewhat ;_; but mostly 'lord, what fools these mortals be'.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:14 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/apr/29/unpublished-sun-poll-brown-bigotMaybe not as bad as it seemed?
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)
perhaps incoherent thinking out loud would have been better, but good grief it's a terrible article.
― caek, Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)
hersterical more like
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:26 (fifteen years ago)
her points were a little vaginal & of the oikos for my taste
― ogmor, Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)
The political scene just seems a clusterfuck right now and I'm being even more negative than usual I guess, though most people said that was an awful article. How much did it have to do with gender, given that female broadsheet columnists aren't a small minority? Not a lot but if yr being a fucking tard like Tracer yesterday you could probably crib together and play up something about female intellectuals being dismissed as schizo or whatever yeah. Playfully/insincerely deployed 'high concept words' in srs contexts are usually NAGL but tempting in the context of 90s ish hypersensitivity to word-choice. Thankfully at least my spelling is up to it today.
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)
good grief it's a terrible article.
The fault lies with the editor, we can all scribble chaotic, tendentious, inflammatory shite but at least even the middle school rag week paper rejected my only forays into journalism. The leading centre-left paper in the English speaking world should do better.
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)
middle school rag week paper
dude
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:51 (fifteen years ago)
you've been told once
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:52 (fifteen years ago)
I honestly don't think you're accurate in assigning words to that piece like 'inflammatory' - I didn't see anything to suggest she was being like that.
Choosing words carefully rather than haranguing others for their possibly-sexist word choices is usually the way to go - if you want to tip language in a fairer direction, use words that send it that way without a big old song and dance on the subject. But three of you in a row threw up dodgy words so I was probably justified in pointing it out. So many of the Guardian threads I see under women's columns these days contain troll comments summed up as 'shut up, you're a GURL (and you're more privileged than I am with your fancy column)' so I hate to think that shit is migrating over here.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:53 (fifteen years ago)
so I hate to think that shit is migrating over here.
Then be glad it isn't and don't link to awful pieces like that. There are two (one female!) psychiatrists in my extended family and I'd wager they'd describe her emotional lability in that piece as quite exaggerated. But they'd probably counsel against snarkily using psychopathological terms like I did. Anyway yr an interesting contributor here so I'd rather not alienate you further.
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:13 (fifteen years ago)
19.51: Hello, this is the political correspondent. I am in the spin room, where Michael Gove, Yvette Cooper and Lord Ashdown are among those making their presence felt. Word is that David Cameron will go on the attack tonight, with Nick Clegg being the main target.
― caek, Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:16 (fifteen years ago)
gove threatening attack sounds pretty scareeey
Lord Ashdown
read this as ashcroft
now that would be must-see tv
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:19 (fifteen years ago)
This is probably going to matter way more than the last debate. Needs introduction by Andy Townsend though.
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:20 (fifteen years ago)
I've been stopped by a stranger and told I look like Gove, which is excellent news I'm sure you'll agree.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)
I can see that.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)
ouch
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:22 (fifteen years ago)
I'd say I'm more a bit Mourinho, a bit Russell Crowe, so gawd knows what that guy had been drinking
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:24 (fifteen years ago)
I linked to the piece because I thought it was good! She made a lot of points brilliantly - and the thing that got me was even as she pointed out how much tax immigrants pay she was willing to own up to feeling guilty for the Toryism inherent in "I pay".
Throwing around psych terms is just a fancy way of saying 'strident' IMO. If you've got shrinks in your family you should probably know better than to offer a lay person's diagnosis on a psych matter - this information and your inappropriate and overplayed attempt to pathologize a Guardian writer as if you had personal beef with her are things that leave me a distinct shade of unimpressed. Sorry.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:28 (fifteen years ago)
the rochdale woman didn't say enough to provoke all this wailing
if she'd said "ban all immigration" or "they come here taking our benefits" or whatever, then aight, but she didn't go there so it seems a bit overblown
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:30 (fifteen years ago)
"with greece so much in the news" gracefully obscures the total lack of a causal relationship there
― caek, Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:33 (fifteen years ago)
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:35 (fifteen years ago)
oh what
The BBC set looks quite sumptous in HD and makes ITV's game show effort look even more pitiful.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:39 (fifteen years ago)
'sumptuous'.
job tax
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)
is that when part of your job gets taken by the government and given to someone else to do?
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
1930s leading in decade namedrops
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
that itv set was so bad!
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)
HD? Oh, I thought sumptuous = ORANGE.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:44 (fifteen years ago)
does clegg have a problem with his make up or is that just the light
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)
looks kinda kilroy ish
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)
It's like a summit meeting between George Hamilton, John Boehner and Kilroy-Silk in man-tan terms.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)
why the f haven't the tories u-turned on the inheritance tax thing?
wtf does it gain them?
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:50 (fifteen years ago)
Brown ruling out Labour-Tory alliance
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:50 (fifteen years ago)
Because they totally believe in taking it with them. xpost
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)
Cameron sticking up for the super-rich
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)
Clegg getting the youth vote right there
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)
fuck off nick clegg we're heard this "two old parties/there they go again" shit b4
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)
Clegg's salary "REALLY GOOD" fyi
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:55 (fifteen years ago)
Brown keeps referring to 'The Liberal Party' - what does he think he's tapping into here?
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)
Really surprised to dislike all three so much - thought I'd like Clegg more.
― Gravel Puzzleworth, Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:57 (fifteen years ago)
"grip it very very hard" -- yeah ya did
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:57 (fifteen years ago)
^ILX, you seldom disappoint!
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:58 (fifteen years ago)
the internet: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22grip+it+very+very+hard%22&hl=en&safe=off&client=safari&rls=en&tbs=mbl:1&tbo=u&ei=FuXZS8-uG5m80gSjs91X&sa=X&oi=realtime_result_group_more_results_link&ct=title&resnum=3&ved=0CBoQ5QUwAg
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:59 (fifteen years ago)
oh burn
― caek, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)
lookin 4ward to GB freakin out if Cameron again completely avoids responding to his criticisms.
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)
another nice big-up to women there
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)
lol oh let's get the violins out for small businesses dave
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)
the bukkakeho dcameron looking shifty as hell right dere
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)
how does he expect the unconverted to believe his shit about saving £6bn in leaflets etc
clegg's winning. but it's shit.
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)
seems worse than the other two debates and harder to separate them
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
cameron vs. black man
― caek, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
propleh
― pollos da don (tpp), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)
Thought Clegg has been quite poor in this debate so far, it's between Brown and Cameron with neither having a killer punch.
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)
Same answers for a third week running here.
― if, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)
Nightmare question this one, being handled quite well (by ignoring it)
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:22 (fifteen years ago)
whole lot of gripping from cameron tonight
― xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)
haha was going to say the same xxp
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)
thats it i'm starting a nasty criminal gang
― pollos da don (tpp), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)
cameron scaremongering especially unseemly here
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)
dem hardened criminalz of tomorrow
― pollos da don (tpp), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)
not impressed by clegg but never am
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)
*throws gang sign*
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)
clegg getting a lil bit killed here imo
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)
shadows of society seeming quite attractive after 1 hour of this bullshit
― pollos da don (tpp), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)
lol zing from Clegg "let's just save time and assume every time you talk about our policy you're wrong" (btw, aye, still getting pwned here by Cameron)
― ailsa, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)
another grip!!
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)
lol zing from Clegg "let's just save time and assume every time you talk about our policy you're wrong"
yeah this was what i thought fell flat... it'd be ok if said by richard schiff or something
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)
Thought the 'yes or no' thing worked quite well
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)
Who are these weird people who don't save and don't obey the rules, who are getting rewarded? Bankers?
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:31 (fifteen years ago)
"People who don't obey the rules and think about saving" wtf?
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)
how the fuck can't an accountant buy a house in birmingham? maybe not their fkn dream home but i'm sure they could get something if their credit isn't shot
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)
i mean wtf is this 'play by the rules' crap? haha xp
― pollos da don (tpp), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)
Not everybody knows your rules, David.
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:33 (fifteen years ago)
aren't we supposed to spending rather than saving?!?!
― pollos da don (tpp), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:33 (fifteen years ago)
Not sure, forgot to read the rules, just trying to pick it up as I go along tbh.
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
wtf kind of house is anna after that she can't find one on two wages
― g.w.f.nagl (cozen), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:36 (fifteen years ago)
two decent wages
clegg just looks juvenile and anxious, all milhouse eyebrows and twitchy pleading
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)
Totally weird framing of the housing question if we're meant to go "YEAH THIS IS AN ISSUE! Well-off professional couples can't buy a house!". No-one watching actually thinks that's a thing, is it?
― ailsa, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)
think anna got gazumped and wants vengeance
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)
Anyone think the dole is actually quite a good thing? And that, yes if you're going to have a system like this, there may be people you don't like, whose life you don't approve of, using government money, but that that's better than compulsory labour?
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)
STOP GORDON - DON'T TALK ABOUT PENSIONERS
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:42 (fifteen years ago)
"I met a pensioner in Rochdale yesterday.."
― The Man With the Magic Eardrums (Billy Dods), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)
ffs 'philosophical issues' rly a trending topic in the marginals
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)
BRING BACK THE CANE
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)
You never forget your teacher, especially if it was that 'die! die! die!' dude with the dumbell.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)
shit this isn't good
cameron talking drivel but sonning brown on delivery
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
Ha ha.
Cameron's really been hitting the rightist dog whistles more than in previous debates - discipline, old-fashioned teaching methods, aspiration, crazy rules etc.
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
looooooool
― pollos da don (tpp), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
andy coulson, take a bow son
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:55 (fifteen years ago)
I don't get it. One week Cameron's saying "oooh yes, less government intervention, run your own schools" and the next he's stipulating that kids should be taught to read using the synthetic phonics method.
― Zoe Espera, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)
cameron goin old-school in the finish
um yeah so guys, this deficit...?
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)
Thought they'd tackled that well hm - just, um, get rid of waste. And get rid of crazy rules. And make sure everyone does the right thing and obeys the rules, just not the crazy ones. Yeah.
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:00 (fifteen years ago)
cameron's closer vastly better than the other two.
― pollos da don (tpp), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
On to Brooker...
― yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
the xx!
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)
Cameron's probably clinched it tonight, then?
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:04 (fifteen years ago)
brooker? where?|
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:05 (fifteen years ago)
c4 iirc?
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)
watching amstell on NMTBC -- prolly funnier imo
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)
I hope not. He was never going to impress me, but I really don't see what was so impressive about him. He avoided answering several questions and was repetitive, particularly when he droned on about 'waste'. What is this 'waste' Dave? Please define it. He never did. It's just 'waste'.
― Count Palmiro Vicarion (Stew), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)
but they were all terrible
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:08 (fifteen years ago)
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Politics/Pix/pictures/2010/4/29/1272573615141/Nick-Clegg-and-Gordon-Bro-006.jpg
― caek, Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:10 (fifteen years ago)
Waste was the government having a meditation room, because you know that the money spent on having 1x empty room to sit in quietly could have funded... something, nationwide
― xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:12 (fifteen years ago)
ITV poll has Brown and Clegg about neck and neck (around 31% each) and Cameron at a measly 17%. Ok, it's just one poll and it's not particularly reliable but it seems Dave didn't impress folk much.
― Count Palmiro Vicarion (Stew), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:14 (fifteen years ago)
Damn, did I miss the treadmill challenge? xxp
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:15 (fifteen years ago)
ehh dudes there are going to be cuts as big as thatcher's, even if labour get in. alastair darling said so. so prolly mebbe learn to live with the fact that they will describe what they cut as waste.
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:15 (fifteen years ago)
woah remember this guy?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/apr/29/labour-unleashes-secret-weapon-tony-blair
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:19 (fifteen years ago)
He would've absolutely killed it in these debates.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:23 (fifteen years ago)
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:25 (fifteen years ago)
the polls are saying Cameron won.
idgi.
― nevermind312, Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:32 (fifteen years ago)
rly? jesus
i was about to post that basically the lesson of the three debates was that cameron. hasn't. landed. it.
i still think that's true actually
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:38 (fifteen years ago)
i guess thatcher's win in 1979 was actually harder won than you might think, but still, 1997 was a foregone conclusion, and this election felt like one not that long ago
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:39 (fifteen years ago)
this was trending cameron for a while but he was killing it near the end, a+ luntzian 'compassionate conservatism' schmaltz
YouGov puts the Tory leader on 41%, followed by Nick Clegg on 32% and Gordon Brown on 25%.ComRes had Mr Cameron two points ahead of Mr Clegg on 35% with Mr Brown trailing in third on 26%.
ComRes had Mr Cameron two points ahead of Mr Clegg on 35% with Mr Brown trailing in third on 26%.
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)
What?
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:45 (fifteen years ago)
fair question. i was thinking of sea-change elections. this was billed as one. but it's turned into a quagmire because imho cameron doesn't have it, whereas blair and (you have to face it) thatcher did
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:51 (fifteen years ago)
daaaaamn gove ethering paddy ashdown on newsnight
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)
Well, it probably will be a sea change election of sorts, just not a sea change of Red-to-Blue or Blue-to-Red. It might well end up being the end of either.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)
yeah i guess so
it's weird: like (i think) a lot of people, i can't really see what's about to happen (hung parliament, more economic shittiness) even though it's as good as inevitable
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)
'79 less of a sea-change than '83, though, right?
― Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:10 (fifteen years ago)
true
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:11 (fifteen years ago)
did we?
Sir Alex Ferguson has taken his footballing mind games into the world of politics, declaring the current election campaign "squeaky bum time" for David Cameron.Sir Alex declared the current race for Number 10 wide openHe made the comments before Gordon Brown's political own goal, during which the Prime Minister described voter Gillian Duffy as a "bigoted woman" while still on microphone....the lifelong Labour supporter went on to defend politicians' references to Mr Cameron's privileged upbringing as "fair game"."How can it be class war to say the guy went to Eton, or that he was part of some dreadful right-wing social club at Oxford?" he said told the Daily Mirror."Where you come from does matter you know. His policies are all about helping his own sort."
Sir Alex declared the current race for Number 10 wide open
He made the comments before Gordon Brown's political own goal, during which the Prime Minister described voter Gillian Duffy as a "bigoted woman" while still on microphone.
...the lifelong Labour supporter went on to defend politicians' references to Mr Cameron's privileged upbringing as "fair game".
"How can it be class war to say the guy went to Eton, or that he was part of some dreadful right-wing social club at Oxford?" he said told the Daily Mirror.
"Where you come from does matter you know. His policies are all about helping his own sort."
― nakhchivan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:43 (fifteen years ago)
?? I thought labour were broke?
― g.w.f.nagl (cozen), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:47 (fifteen years ago)
Favourite image of the campaign so far:
http://imgur.com/F7lBQ.png
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:49 (fifteen years ago)
Don't worry folks, renowned political expert Claire Sweeney is on This Week to sway our votes.
― ailsa, Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:53 (fifteen years ago)
First I find myself 'included' by Nick Griffin, then I find myself in full agreement with 'Sir' Alex......very strange day.
― sonofstan, Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:09 (fifteen years ago)
even better with all three
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2010/04/30/world/30britain_CA0/30britain_CA0-articleLarge.jpg
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Friday, 30 April 2010 01:06 (fifteen years ago)
Jesus, Kraftwerk really have gone to shit.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Friday, 30 April 2010 05:18 (fifteen years ago)
Damn, beat me to it.
― Mark G, Friday, 30 April 2010 06:53 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, I can't look at that picture without Showroom Dummies coming into my head.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Friday, 30 April 2010 08:38 (fifteen years ago)
That Kraftwerk gag is two weeks old now dudes, even Gordon Brown knows when to stop.
― Matt DC, Friday, 30 April 2010 08:38 (fifteen years ago)
^
― sausage s4rgent (acoleuthic), Friday, 30 April 2010 08:40 (fifteen years ago)
Didn't get the memo :(
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Friday, 30 April 2010 08:41 (fifteen years ago)
'At some point, after Cameron's been going on a bit, just say, “Oh shut the fuck up. I'm sick of your smug fucking vicar voice, and you look like a waxed testicle. Shit off.” Secondly, replace the last debate with a drinking contest. Brown on Tennent's Extra, Cameron on the fucking Champers darling and Clegg on homemade elderflower wine or whatever the fuck. That should be a win now Charles Kennedy's out of the picture. Brown should cough over Cameron more. Not actually say “bullshit”, but something similar in number of syllables.'
Quality work here Mr Tucker.
― Matt DC, Friday, 30 April 2010 08:42 (fifteen years ago)
http://timesonline.typepad.com/oliver_kamm/2010/04/what-is-to-be-done.html
This is a feeble, unimaginative, incompetent and intellectually incurious Prime Minister, whose hapless, cynical and dysfunctional government has debased the notion of public service, coarsened public life and forfeited any claim to public respect, and I shall be voting for its return to office next Thursday. This post, for what it's worth, explains my reasoning. (It shouldn't need saying, but of course, as with any signed comment, I'm speaking only for myself.)...But I shall vote Labour for this reason. The worse the Labour defeat, the more likely it is that the wrong person will be blamed: Tony Blair rather than Gordon Brown. Guessing the future alignments of British politics is futile. Things can change radically. They might have done but eventually did not in the 1980s. But the safest route to preserving liberalism seems to me to be to shore up Labour's support, ensure that David Miliband rather than Ed Balls becomes Leader of the Opposition after the election, and thereby help the British polity conform once again to the conventions of two-party politics. That may not be possible. If the electoral system ossifies political stalemate and sustains a Labour Party that would otherwise subside into an irrelevance comparable to that of the French Communist Party, then liberal strategy would need to change. But not now; not yet.
But I shall vote Labour for this reason. The worse the Labour defeat, the more likely it is that the wrong person will be blamed: Tony Blair rather than Gordon Brown. Guessing the future alignments of British politics is futile. Things can change radically. They might have done but eventually did not in the 1980s. But the safest route to preserving liberalism seems to me to be to shore up Labour's support, ensure that David Miliband rather than Ed Balls becomes Leader of the Opposition after the election, and thereby help the British polity conform once again to the conventions of two-party politics. That may not be possible. If the electoral system ossifies political stalemate and sustains a Labour Party that would otherwise subside into an irrelevance comparable to that of the French Communist Party, then liberal strategy would need to change. But not now; not yet.
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 10:08 (fifteen years ago)
i'm worried people will blame tony blair!!!
england must confirm to two party politics!!!
― went ham in a bad way (stevie), Friday, 30 April 2010 10:10 (fifteen years ago)
i mean i'm not entirely unsympathetic to his conclusion, but the way he puts it makes me want to vote respect.
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 10:11 (fifteen years ago)
This post, for what it's worth, explains my reasoning.
... but not very convincingly
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Friday, 30 April 2010 10:15 (fifteen years ago)
I'm enjoying this recent "Labour Party is the best choice for Liberal capitalists" line because a) fuck those guys, and b) it is the sort of horribly true history of the Labour Party.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Friday, 30 April 2010 10:16 (fifteen years ago)
"Blame Tony Blair" shoudl absolutely be a Labour slogan in this election, and for every election that follows in living memory.
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Friday, 30 April 2010 10:19 (fifteen years ago)
Blaming Blair is never a bad thing, even if we blame him for allowing Brown to be in charge of most of the departments of gov that he eventually fucked up from 1997 onwards.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Friday, 30 April 2010 10:21 (fifteen years ago)
Bliar surely?
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Friday, 30 April 2010 10:21 (fifteen years ago)
I'm slightly shocked when presumably well-paid journos still don't get that Brown ran a lot of the show even when Blair was nominally PM.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Friday, 30 April 2010 10:22 (fifteen years ago)
It's good but it'll never replace I Blame Thatcher though
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Friday, 30 April 2010 10:22 (fifteen years ago)
Where has Alistair Darling been all campaign? Supposedly Labour's greatest asset and he's been invisible, especially relative to Harriet Harman, Alan Johnson, David Miliband and even Jack Straw.
― Matt DC, Friday, 30 April 2010 10:25 (fifteen years ago)
Hope he's growing that beard back.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Friday, 30 April 2010 10:26 (fifteen years ago)
Probably hiding somewhere with Oliver Letwin.
― James Mitchell, Friday, 30 April 2010 10:30 (fifteen years ago)
Where has Alistair Darling been all campaign?
Absolutely, one of the few people to have came out of the recent financial debacle with their reputation enhanced. I don't know why labour don't just show the recent BBC2 programme where he talks about how close to financial meltdown the country was. In fact I'm suprised that Brown hasn't nailed Cameron with the 'Tories would have done nothing' line that he was using a few months ago.
― State Attorney Foxhart Cubycheck (Billy Dods), Friday, 30 April 2010 10:50 (fifteen years ago)
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/30/article-1269986-095F37C6000005DC-18_634x423.jpg
― James Mitchell, Friday, 30 April 2010 11:30 (fifteen years ago)
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/4/30/1272624831325/A-car-was-crashed-into-a--007.jpg
labour event interrupted by heavyhanded symbolism
― joe, Friday, 30 April 2010 11:33 (fifteen years ago)
massive xpThe Man Who Looks Like He Works in Marketing Strategy for Britain's Eighth Largest Packaging Supplies Company
that osbourne didn't get mentioned last night is ridiculous
― Earning your Masters in Library and Information Science is beautiful (schlump), Friday, 30 April 2010 11:45 (fifteen years ago)
The accident also involved a group of refuse collectors in a dustbin lorry, who were jeering out of their window.
― went ham in a bad way (stevie), Friday, 30 April 2010 11:48 (fifteen years ago)
they were just big gits.
― Mark G, Friday, 30 April 2010 11:49 (fifteen years ago)
Sounds like Brown fucked up yesterday then? The Tories are so vulnerable on the economy and he played into Cameron's hands?
― Matt DC, Friday, 30 April 2010 12:23 (fifteen years ago)
i thought brown did pretty good. but whaddo i know.
i have to say, if you ARE going to insult a voter on-mic, do it right before a debate. it's funny how everybody's already practically forgotten about it.
but can i just say, britain, STOP GETTING DEBATES WRONG? you don't schedule all three of them within like two weeks of each other, right before the election. you need enough breathing space for the debates to set the agenda, for positions to get circulated, for arguments to coalesce. there wasn't any buildup to these at all.
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 12:28 (fifteen years ago)
there wasn't any hard questioning either <- bigger problem
― mdskltr (blueski), Friday, 30 April 2010 12:29 (fifteen years ago)
jeezhttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7653913/General-Election-2010-Kerry-McCarthy-illegally-publishes-election-vote-results-on-Twitter.html
― g.w.f.nagl (cozen), Friday, 30 April 2010 12:33 (fifteen years ago)
xxp, perhaps, but i think a big part of the difference between our debates and the U.S. ones is that it's not a binary proposition with two options that are relatively distinct in most areas. in 2010 there aren't the kinds of differences of principle between the three parties here (with a few lib dem policy exceptions) that lead to debates that are more than wonkishness about details or eloquence competitions.
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 12:34 (fifteen years ago)
jesus christ xp
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 12:35 (fifteen years ago)
i) what was the exact wording of her tweetii) does she have an iq of < 85?
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 12:36 (fifteen years ago)
RT @Kerry4MP First PVs opened in east Bristol, our sample: Lib Dem x; Tory y; Labour z
― g.w.f.nagl (cozen), Friday, 30 April 2010 12:39 (fifteen years ago)
wouldn't be quiiiiiiiiite so bad if she wasn't meme tzar
― one of your top-tier posters! (history mayne), Friday, 30 April 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)
We might want to delete that - I think republishing the tweet is theoretically an offense too...
― carson dial, Friday, 30 April 2010 12:42 (fifteen years ago)
Jesus, what a cretin.
― MPx4A, Friday, 30 April 2010 12:42 (fifteen years ago)
oh woops here come the plod
― g.w.f.nagl (cozen), Friday, 30 April 2010 12:43 (fifteen years ago)
*S*M*H*
― went ham in a bad way (stevie), Friday, 30 April 2010 12:43 (fifteen years ago)
i disagree caek, i think there are big differences but the candidates haven't been drawn out on them. more time to focus on the debates would mean more time for journalists to chew things over and set out the lines of questioning. but this gets into a bigger conversation about whether a two-month campaign is long enough to draw the contrasts and while i used to admire the rough-and-ready lets-go attitude of UK elections (and i still hate the year and a half that USA needs to campaign for president) it's just not enough time. the candidates can all skate by without really saying anything. and yes, zero tough questions and zero followup is a problem although american debates share that one.
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 12:44 (fifteen years ago)
It was also posted on the official Labour Party Twitter account, and remained there for several hours.
wtf??
have put in a mod req to remove the RT
― g.w.f.nagl (cozen), Friday, 30 April 2010 12:45 (fifteen years ago)
labour had no money to finance a full campaign hence the shotgun nature of it all, which partially explains the little breathing room betw. debates
― g.w.f.nagl (cozen), Friday, 30 April 2010 12:46 (fifteen years ago)
agree tht it's not ideal however
there are big differences between the leader's styles, but i'm not sure there are differences of policy that people would make good tv (i.e. that people would sit through). maybe it would trickle down and set an agenda though, yeah. but differences of principle/philosophy are great for tv because obviously all you get is heat, no light, and i don't think they exist to anything like the same extent as they do in the u.s.
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 12:48 (fifteen years ago)
I've removed the numbers from that Tweet.
― Matt DC, Friday, 30 April 2010 12:50 (fifteen years ago)
thanks matt
― g.w.f.nagl (cozen), Friday, 30 April 2010 12:50 (fifteen years ago)
what were they, out of interest?
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Friday, 30 April 2010 13:02 (fifteen years ago)
Arabic numerals, apparently
― nakhchivan, Friday, 30 April 2010 13:03 (fifteen years ago)
Tracer you make it sound like the electorate hasn't had (at least) four years to get an idea of the differences between the parties and what they stand for. And lengthening the gap between debates won't make any difference because it won't do anything to solve the main problem, which is the poisonous three-way influence of the media, the party leaders and the electoral system.
The print media have already decided who they want to win, TV journalists are more interested in tripping up politicians over small details than seriously focussing on policy, and the leaders don't actually want to appear too different from one another lest they frighten off centre-ground swing voters in the small number of marginals than decide elections. And it doesn't help that not a single one of the party leaders has really gone into any detail about what they intend to cut, surely the biggest policy issue of this election, in fact they've deliberately hidden it.
― Matt DC, Friday, 30 April 2010 13:04 (fifteen years ago)
It doesn't help that the lines of questioning have all followed more or less the same populist right-wing print media agenda either.
― Matt DC, Friday, 30 April 2010 13:05 (fifteen years ago)
there was that guy from bristol who asked if they wanted to uninvite the pope
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 13:06 (fifteen years ago)
Right-wing media not too keen on paedos from what I recall.
― Matt DC, Friday, 30 April 2010 13:07 (fifteen years ago)
xxp I disagree on the first point, Matt- neither of the two major party leaders are exactly champions of boldly stating where they stand on any of the major issues, so a debate where they have to answer direct questions in public without fudging (if it's done properly, anyway) deserves a little more attention than whatever obfuscations the preceding four years have provided, particularly coming up to the big vote.
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Friday, 30 April 2010 13:08 (fifteen years ago)
Well the government have actually done a few things in the last four years of office and the opposition have actually opposed a few of those things so it's not a big leap to draw a conclusion or two from that, surely?
― Matt DC, Friday, 30 April 2010 13:11 (fifteen years ago)
Ah you're not giving them a fair chance to outlay their visions for the future
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Friday, 30 April 2010 13:14 (fifteen years ago)
How do you propose to get politicians to answer direct questions and not fudge or say "x is very important" without having any intention of doing anything about it?
c.f. Cameron assuring us last night that science and renewable energy were the future when I don't trust the Tories to invest seriously in either of these; Brown's mantra of things the Labour party are very keenly looking into and having many good ideas about despite having done sod all about for 13 years
― xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Friday, 30 April 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)
Enforce election manifestos as legal contracts, corporal punishment consequences
― just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Friday, 30 April 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)
recall could be fun
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 13:28 (fifteen years ago)
Results 1 - 10 of about 78 for RT @Kerry4MP First PVs opened in east Bristol, our sample. (0.31 seconds)
― Mark G, Friday, 30 April 2010 14:18 (fifteen years ago)
Mr Brown is asked by one pupil why he went into politics - he says he saw unemployment around him as he was growing up and wanted to do something to help. He then asks the children what subjects they like at school and what they want to do when they grow up. One says he wants to be an inventor and invent a time machine. Mr Brown says he could introduce the boy to Doctor Who - quite a claim, but then several Doctors have backed Labour's election bid.
― James Mitchell, Friday, 30 April 2010 14:30 (fifteen years ago)
The Guardian comes out:
Citizens have votes. Newspapers do not. However, if the Guardian had a vote in the 2010 general election it would be cast enthusiastically for the Liberal Democrats. It would be cast in the knowledge that not all the consequences are predictable, and that some in particular should be avoided. The vote would be cast with some important reservations and frustrations. Yet it would be cast for one great reason of principle above all.After the campaign that the Liberal Democrats have waged over this past month, for which considerable personal credit goes to Nick Clegg, the election presents the British people with a huge opportunity: the reform of the electoral system itself. Though Labour has enjoyed a deathbed conversion to aspects of the cause of reform, it is the Liberal Democrats who have most consistently argued that cause in the round and who, after the exhaustion of the old politics, reflect and lead an overwhelming national mood for real change.
After the campaign that the Liberal Democrats have waged over this past month, for which considerable personal credit goes to Nick Clegg, the election presents the British people with a huge opportunity: the reform of the electoral system itself. Though Labour has enjoyed a deathbed conversion to aspects of the cause of reform, it is the Liberal Democrats who have most consistently argued that cause in the round and who, after the exhaustion of the old politics, reflect and lead an overwhelming national mood for real change.
― James Mitchell, Friday, 30 April 2010 18:05 (fifteen years ago)
i know it's not that wau, but wau
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Friday, 30 April 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)
It then goes on to recommend voting Labour in Lab-Con marginals. At least they didn't come out for Cameron. The Indy will probably come out for the LibDems in the end as well leaving Labour with the Mirror and nothing else.
― Matt DC, Friday, 30 April 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)
Though no-one gives a fuck what newspaper editorials suggest....right?
― nakhchivan, Friday, 30 April 2010 18:28 (fifteen years ago)
The Guardian not endorsing Labour is actually pretty big news.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Friday, 30 April 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)
they've supported the conservatives and sdlp before iirc. this is not a first.
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 18:41 (fifteen years ago)
Sinking ships though......certainly it would be if there was any chance of a Labour outright majority, as it is it's primarily of interest for the thought of Rusbridger trembling in his office while various unstable Damien McBride types skulk the building.
― nakhchivan, Friday, 30 April 2010 18:42 (fifteen years ago)
(just weird because they've been Lab since I moved here)
― yes we kenya (suzy), Friday, 30 April 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)
They've probably been Labour since forever, or whenever they triumphed over mancunian whig industrialists, at a guess.
'good election to lose', though....
― nakhchivan, Friday, 30 April 2010 18:47 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/apr/23/guardian-editorial-alan-rusbridger
apparently they supported the conservatives in 1983, and labour less often than you think before then
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 18:52 (fifteen years ago)
― caek, Friday, April 30, 2010 7:41 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark
blimey. i can imagine them being librul a hundred years ago, but when were they tory?
ha xpost
wau. must read further!
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Friday, 30 April 2010 18:53 (fifteen years ago)
anyone know what "Pty Bal" means (not the same as "Coalition", apparently)
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 18:56 (fifteen years ago)
i've tweeted the question to rusbridger. we'll see how serious the fucker is about web 2.0 now.
― joe, Friday, 30 April 2010 19:09 (fifteen years ago)
Haha
very surprised by 83, have to say,
― nakhchivan, Friday, 30 April 2010 19:20 (fifteen years ago)
i suppose if they weren't going to support labour, that would be the election to do it in
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 19:22 (fifteen years ago)
Sure, but actively supporting Conservatives does surprise
2005 was the time to go LibDem surely?
― nakhchivan, Friday, 30 April 2010 19:28 (fifteen years ago)
i like the times waiting until 01/05 to support blair
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 19:30 (fifteen years ago)
The suspense! Families across the land huddled around the fireplace into the small hours, the edgy sounds of Franz Ferdinand wafting through the dead air as they tapped F5 frenetically on their new 'wifi enabled' discount laptops....
― nakhchivan, Friday, 30 April 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)
D'aw, c'mon nakhchivan, everyone loves a good election eve, the cheers, the tears, the deepening sense of dread for the future, Snow's pendulous swinging bell, the stirring rallying cry for the future ringing thro the chartered streets from the lowliest orphan to the loftiest lord - 'It's a good election to lose!'.
Don't feel your blood stirring just a bit?
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Friday, 30 April 2010 19:42 (fifteen years ago)
The filipino Emmeline Pankhurst commemorative figurines on the mantelpiece were seen to weep tears of ecstasy at as the first Chilterns dormitory town returned its patronage to its drinksodden septuagenarian incumbent.
― nakhchivan, Friday, 30 April 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)
When my mom rang tonight I asked her if they'd had any coverage of this in the US. She said 'yes' and mentioned 'oh they seem to be having these debates'. There's also been coverage of the bigot thing which is being spun as the thing that's going to cost Brown the election. However my mom basically wrote the Rochdale lady off for staying classy and hiring a PR, because she felt what Brown said was a pretty mild form of calling someone out for xenophobia.
― yes we kenya (suzy), Friday, 30 April 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)
As it's declaration evening, it turns out that after all that I'll be voting Labour - only just found out my constituency is a very marginal one, leaving me basically with no choice at all. Not the most enthusiastic endorsement Gordon might've hoped for, but I don't suppose he's turning them down at the moment.
― Ismael Klata, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:31 (fifteen years ago)
According to the BBC the Guardian supported the SDP in 1983 and last supported the Tories in 1955 ie several lifetimes ago.
― Zelda Zonk, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)
That makes much more sense than them endorsing the Tories in 83
― Ismael Klata, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)
Victorian chimneysweep lifetimes, anyway....
Probably shouldn't have been surprised that the Guardian didn't like an actual leftwing Labour Party.
― nakhchivan, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:46 (fifteen years ago)
xp, perhaps, but it contradicts with their own website
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:46 (fifteen years ago)
And?
― yes we kenya (suzy), Friday, 30 April 2010 20:47 (fifteen years ago)
― Ned Trifle II, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)
their website says All./C so you're both right caek & zelda
― joe, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)
'All./ C'
Everyone got a chocolate bar but only Thatcher got a gold star?
― nakhchivan, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)
ungh good grief
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)
― nakhchivan, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:51 (fifteen years ago)
Let's not forget that in 1983 Labour were siding with present-day UKIP on the European issue.
― Zelda Zonk, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)
pretty sure that wasn't the only problem the guardian/the electorate had with them
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:55 (fifteen years ago)
Those were the days....
What’s interesting about 1983 is how few seats the Tory vote increased in, especially in London, a big difference to what happened in 1987 in the capital. The Tories had some pretty bad declines in some seats, such as:Hampstead and Highgate: -5.9%
Hampstead and Highgate: -5.9%
― nakhchivan, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:58 (fifteen years ago)
if the mirror endorsed the lib dems, that would be a big deal.
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)
Well, Labour was also proposing unilateral disarmament which was probably a touch premature given what almost happened in 1983:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Able_Archer_83
― Zelda Zonk, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)
well yes. i thought your UKIP comment was meant to imply labour's failure to stand on an explicitly internationalist socialist platform, rather than just a socialist one, was their main problem in 1983.
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)
The EEC in 1983 probably wasn't a hotbed of international socialism though.
― nakhchivan, Friday, 30 April 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)
exactly. totally not sure what the UKIP point is.
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 21:05 (fifteen years ago)
My point was just that I don't imagine a paper like the Guardian would have been supporting a party that wanted to pull out of the EU (or EEC as it was back then)
― Zelda Zonk, Friday, 30 April 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)
Liberal internationalism! They have all the best songs.
― nakhchivan, Friday, 30 April 2010 21:10 (fifteen years ago)
like you say though, there were plenty of reasons not to back labour then.
they are the least consistent of any of the big papers at least in terms of allegiances, if not principles. i was 2 at the time, so i can't say i remember their politics in detail then, but just based on how erratic they are, i'm not sure the EEC would have been a dealbreaker it might be today. (this is also why their endorsement today is not a big deal.)
would be very interested to read the 83 editorial though.
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)
love these guys btw
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 21:15 (fifteen years ago)
great bunch of lads http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NO2EU
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)
BTW, Grant Shapps is on 5 Live right now getting reamed for letting slip that although Cameron keeps saying he wants a cap on immigration but doesn't know what that number should be.
― James Mitchell, Friday, 30 April 2010 21:19 (fifteen years ago)
Sorta feel that I should book the next day off work and stay up all night to listen to the bad news roll in, but can't really face it
― xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Friday, 30 April 2010 21:56 (fifteen years ago)
Sorta feel that I should book the next dayfive years off work and stay up all night to listen to the bad news roll in, but can't really face it go and live as a hermit.
― Ned Trifle II, Friday, 30 April 2010 22:03 (fifteen years ago)
times endorses conservatives: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/leading_article/article7113404.ece (first time since 92, apparently -- guardian table wrong?)
― caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 22:12 (fifteen years ago)
who the fuck is this old dude?
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/47756000/jpg/_47756909_blair_getty.jpg
― mierda defensa ... no impedir ... espectador (onimo), Friday, 30 April 2010 22:13 (fifteen years ago)
The Times just endorses whoever Murdoch tells it to. It does what the Sun does, except hides behind the veneer of respectability.
― nevermind312, Friday, 30 April 2010 22:18 (fifteen years ago)
Saw Blair chuckling away and charming all on the news earlier on some visit to a health centre - he'd still have cleaned up at this election, if only Labour hadn't decided that replacing him with a complete dud was the way to go.
― Ismael Klata, Friday, 30 April 2010 22:19 (fifteen years ago)
^true story
― ears are wounds, Friday, 30 April 2010 22:24 (fifteen years ago)
Would've been interesting to see Blair in this election up against Clegg & Cameron who are both Blair-lite.
― nevermind312, Friday, 30 April 2010 22:34 (fifteen years ago)
blair talks slower and has this ability to sort of behold himself and appreciate himself even as he's speaking - it's a weird thing but somehow it confers status that those two don't have
blair couldn't stay because he'd taken the country to war under false pretenses innit
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 22:38 (fifteen years ago)
― Zelda Zonk, Friday, April 30, 2010 9:53 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark
low blow. the left was against europe consistently, well before 1983. probably something to do with, idk, ideas of democracy etc. i mean fuck a ukip but the EU is as neoliberal/patrician-elitist as it gets. of course the left is against it.
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Saturday, 1 May 2010 00:56 (fifteen years ago)
At this point I'm resigned to voting Labour in a futile attempt to register my opposition to Cameron getting in. It's pretty pointless because I live in a fairly safe Labour area. My first election was 1997 so blimey am I disillusioned. What exactly is the problem with PR again? Apart from the whole fringe nazi parties getting 5% of the vote thing.
― a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Saturday, 1 May 2010 01:07 (fifteen years ago)
PR prevents strong decisive government by committed Social Democrats like what happened during the last 13 years.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Saturday, 1 May 2010 01:10 (fifteen years ago)
It's a real fucker that my current MP is exactly my kind of Labour MP but he's retiring. The new one makes all the right noises but don't really believe her since she came from the council who are a bunch of wankers iirc.
― a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Saturday, 1 May 2010 01:14 (fifteen years ago)
But she's purdy
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Saturday, 1 May 2010 06:22 (fifteen years ago)
To be honest, I think......people......long ago......rumbled....Blair's habit....of using.....dramatic pauses.....to make his......largely vacuous......statements.....seem more profound.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Saturday, 1 May 2010 06:30 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nicohogg/4565319145/
― nakhchivan, Saturday, 1 May 2010 23:54 (fifteen years ago)
LOLOLOLOL someone on my Twitter is reporting that Sarah Brown has made an appearance at the Vauxhall gay club night, Duckie.
― portmantovani (suzy), Sunday, 2 May 2010 00:08 (fifteen years ago)
I think its easy to forget how HATED Blair was at the end of his Premiership, he was seen as a massive liability and there's no guaranteeing he'd have come through the financial crisis as well as Brown did as PM. Brown might be a gigantic bungler but I don't think he inspires loathing in quite the same way.
Also Brown still seething with resentment at the Treasury would have hampered Britain's response to Lehman's etc I'm sure. And the message on spending cuts might have been very different without Alistair Darling around to check Brown.
― Matt DC, Sunday, 2 May 2010 13:35 (fifteen years ago)
Don't agree with your first para - Blair was hated within Labour, but I don't think that'd transmitted to the electorate at all (except in so far as government unpopularity = Blair unpopularity. I don't think the public ever hated him personally is what I'm trying to say, much as it might've been annoyed by him - not so with Brown). Ditching him for Brown always seemed like a massive, unfathomable error to me at least.
It's interesting the coup seems to now be getting rationalised post-facto as an inevitable response to his failure to condemn Israel's invasion of Lebanon - it's hard to imagine an issue of less relevance to British politics.
― Ismael Klata, Sunday, 2 May 2010 13:55 (fifteen years ago)
More classic material from The Modern Conservative Party
― Matt DC, Sunday, 2 May 2010 13:56 (fifteen years ago)
I feel like Blair had a lot of deep public dislike by the end, because his patter was so gratingly obvious. I think on the whole the GBP is fractionally less hostile to a charmless buffoon who they consider basically sincere than to that combination of evangelical preacher and heartless killbot that Blair represented.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 May 2010 13:59 (fifteen years ago)
there was a lot of Blair hate in the end but more a simmering resentment and sense of betrayal that's not boiled over into "i'll dance on his grave" Thatcher style vitriol.
― mdskltr (blueski), Sunday, 2 May 2010 14:00 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah Ismael I don't really agree there - public trust in Blair had completely collapsed by the end. People thought he was an out and out liar - I remember Cameron scoring a very early point on him with "nobody believes a word you say any more".
― Matt DC, Sunday, 2 May 2010 14:04 (fifteen years ago)
He always looked competent though, which I think is really the test of whether you're a liability or not (popularity maybe not the right word for where I'm coming from). Brown doesn't and never really has - like Major, he doesn't even get credit when things go right.
― Ismael Klata, Sunday, 2 May 2010 14:10 (fifteen years ago)
Incompetence will get you laughed out of office, but it takes special unpleasantness to get people throwing cabbages at you on the way out.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 May 2010 14:20 (fifteen years ago)
6 Apr 18 Apr 22 Apr 28 Apr 2 MayMost seatsCon 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/5 1/16Lab 7/1 - 4/1 4/1 8/1Lib Dem 100/1 - 11/1 16/1 25/1Outright MajorityCon 8/15 13/8 11/8 7/4 8/11Lab 11/1 12/1 16/1 20/1 28/1Lib Dem - 25/1 22/1 33/1 66/1Hung Parliament 13/8 8/13 8/13 4/9 11/10
Most seatsCon 1/6 1/5 1/4 1/5 1/16Lab 7/1 - 4/1 4/1 8/1Lib Dem 100/1 - 11/1 16/1 25/1
Outright MajorityCon 8/15 13/8 11/8 7/4 8/11Lab 11/1 12/1 16/1 20/1 28/1Lib Dem - 25/1 22/1 33/1 66/1
Hung Parliament 13/8 8/13 8/13 4/9 11/10
This is probably settled now, I'd guess - tory majority today moved ahead of hung parliament for the first time since before the debates.
― Ismael Klata, Sunday, 2 May 2010 18:10 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, fuck it, lock thread.
― Ned Trifle II, Sunday, 2 May 2010 19:00 (fifteen years ago)
8/11 is not that far from saying "fuck knows tbh". You'll know it's settled when the bookies stop taking bets.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 May 2010 19:58 (fifteen years ago)
tory majority today moved ahead of hung parliament for the first time since before the debates
ugh. presumably the Tories can take 0 credit for this but surely not another Sun screwjob?
also explain how Lib Dem odds doubled since the debate
― mdskltr (blueski), Sunday, 2 May 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)
Lib Dem outright majority so ridiculously unlikely anyway, maybe the shorter price was just the result of a lot of mug punters putting money on them after the first debate.
All the prices are saying here is that some bookies consider the Tories getting an outright majority fractionally more likely than there being a hung parliament. I agree, those are by far the two most likely outcomes on Friday and the former seems fractionally more likely than the latter, to me.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 May 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)
Seven-point Tory lead over tied LD/Lab since RochFAIL/3rd debate - still not an overall maj according to yr usual uniform swing indications but, if the bookies are saying odds-on, I guess they're seeing some fairly grim local/marginal numbers.
― Michael Jones, Sunday, 2 May 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)
Do the bookies pay out on Tory Majority if they get like 325 and need Trimble etc?
― Gravel Puzzleworth, Sunday, 2 May 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)
I think there's an assumption that the Lib Dems' poll numbers won't translate to huge gains - historically that's a fair guess.
Outright Majority means themselves alone I'd imagine, not that I think there'll be much of a UUP to help them out anyway.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 May 2010 20:33 (fifteen years ago)
I know this is hardly the most original observation, but I've been trawling through various election-related Guardian - Comment Is Free articles and responses, and God the internet if full of nutters, isn't it?
I still think it'll be a hung parliament, unless the Labour vote collapses in the next few days. Playing around with those seats-predictor things, I get the impression the Tories need to open up a lead of at least 12% over Labour to get an overall majority. I've got no idea where we're going long term: if the Tories do manage to get a majority it will be a wafer thin one and the cuts they'll have to impose are bound to reduce their popularity from what is already a very low starting point (for the winning party) - it wouldn't be at all surprising if they couldn't see out the whole term. If no one gets an overall majority I still don't know who the Lib Dems would end up siding with, or how long that arrangement would last and with what consequences.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Sunday, 2 May 2010 21:26 (fifteen years ago)
I really can't imagine any likely outcome that will mean five years before the next election. I think 2 years might be optimistic anyway.
― textbook blows on the head (dowd), Sunday, 2 May 2010 21:31 (fifteen years ago)
Even a very small overall majority could prove workable for the Tories if they're faced with a divided, in-fighting Labour party and a Lib Dem party that wants to keep its contact high with power going.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 May 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)
a Lib Dem party that wants to keep its contact high with power going.
Sorry - what does this mean?
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Sunday, 2 May 2010 21:38 (fifteen years ago)
x-post
Yeah, but I think the divisions in the Tories will come out after the election. The Europe problem will re-emerge, and lots of the old guard hate the slick Blairite approach of Cameron. Here's hoping, anyway.
― textbook blows on the head (dowd), Sunday, 2 May 2010 21:38 (fifteen years ago)
Playing around with those seats-predictor things, I get the impression the Tories need to open up a lead of at least 12% over Labour to get an overall majority.
All those predictor things are based are uniform swing and the subtler analysis the likes of fivethirtyeight are doing seem to point to a grimmer prognosis for Labour. Still, they weren't calling a Tory parl maj a few days ago (and that was based on similar vote share to the 2/5 polls) - "just" a 100-seat advantage over Lab. I've been clinging to the hope of Labour still being the largest single party, forming a coalition, but the numbers just may not be there for that in a week's time.
― Michael Jones, Sunday, 2 May 2010 21:39 (fifteen years ago)
I mean that the party could well decide to capitalise on its new image as holder of the balance of power by cutting some deals with a Tory gov anyway.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 May 2010 21:41 (fifteen years ago)
I'm all for clinging to hope but the brightest possible outcome I can envisage at this point is a genuine coalition of Labour/Lib Dems with a new PM and a referendum on PR high on the agenda.
(NB This actually feels slightly brighter than the thought of Brown staying as leader of the party)
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 May 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)
(xp to nv)Why would they bother? If the Tories have got a working majority, they won't need to cut deals with anyone. If they then lose that working majority before the end of the term, it's presumably either becausea) they've lost several by-electionsorb) they've become divided over some issue and various rebels are voting against CameronIn either situation you would have thought that they would struggle to win any election that followed a vote of no confidence, so it's difficult to see what motivation the Lib Dems would have to cut deals with them.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Sunday, 2 May 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)
A working majority means the Tories wouldn't need to cut deals, but a "hey look at us we're still serious politicians" shtick might lead Lib Dems to demonstrate their ability to work with the Gov. Any Gov. Plus a working majority isn't a perma-solid thing - the ability to get most of yr legislation thru plus the ability to face down a no-confidence vote, really.
I'm just saying let's not kid ourselves that you need some 30-plus majority to bend Parliament to yr will.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 May 2010 21:51 (fifteen years ago)
Or that if Cameron squeaks in he'll be inclined or forced to go for a double or quits election 12 months down the line.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 May 2010 21:53 (fifteen years ago)
All those predictor things are based are uniform swing and the subtler analysis the likes of fivethirtyeight are doing seem to point to a grimmer prognosis for Labour.
FWIW, uniform swing has never been _very_ wrong in England. Scotland is another matter. No idea how NBS is finding con needs a 12% uniform swing though. It's more like 6% iirc.
― caek, Sunday, 2 May 2010 21:55 (fifteen years ago)
I didn't say anything about a 12% uniform swing - I said they need to open up a lead of about 12%.http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8609989.stmIf I give the Lib Dems about 28% and the 'Others' about 10% (which is broadly in line with the polls), then the Tories overtake Labour in terms of seats when they have about a 6% lead in votes, but don't get an overall majority until they are a huge 13.5% ahead of Labour.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Sunday, 2 May 2010 22:05 (fifteen years ago)
i think it's going to be a hung parliament
but yeah however it goes, probably wont last five years
maybe it'll be like callaghan 76-9 rump govt, imposing big ass cuts, getting mad strikes, then getting evicted hard style
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Sunday, 2 May 2010 22:12 (fifteen years ago)
I didn't say anything about a 12% uniform swing - I said they need to open up a lead of about 12%.
ah right you are.
― caek, Sunday, 2 May 2010 22:12 (fifteen years ago)
One thing that might hold the government together for a bit longer is that someone who calls a snap election, or passes a successful vote of no confidence will be the most hated person/people/party in Britain. People hate elections, basically, and having to go through this again within a year would be immensely unpopular.
― textbook blows on the head (dowd), Sunday, 2 May 2010 22:43 (fifteen years ago)
And yet: Labour called a second election in 1974 and won it; the Tories forced through a vote of no confidence in 1979 and then won the resulting election. Maybe people just lurved elections in the 70s.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Sunday, 2 May 2010 22:46 (fifteen years ago)
I think people would rather have a bloody coup that they won't have to do much in than have any more leaflets through their doors, or disruptions to tv schedules.
― textbook blows on the head (dowd), Sunday, 2 May 2010 22:48 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7670867/General-Election-2010-Tories-rule-out-Lib-Dem-alliance.html
― caek, Monday, 3 May 2010 08:49 (fifteen years ago)
hubris is good
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 09:04 (fifteen years ago)
Yep, that scenario could be good for the anti-tory forces, as long as they initially hold their fire and let Cameron pass his first budget. Then when the cuts take hold and the economy dips again...
OTOH, I still think the Tories will scrape through with an absolute majority.
― Zelda Zonk, Monday, 3 May 2010 09:20 (fifteen years ago)
wonder if, with a different lib dem leader, or a different labour leader, the two parties would explicitly be talking about an anti-tory alliance now
i don't think the tories will get an absolute majority -- it was looking dodgy enough before the campaign began iirc, and even if it's detumesced a little, the lib dem surge is still a factor
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Monday, 3 May 2010 09:31 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe more designed to kill off Labour by removing the vote-Liberal-get-Tory line.
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 3 May 2010 09:35 (fifteen years ago)
Apparently some people are too embarrassed to admit to pollsters that they will vote Tory. Good faith and all that. Plus the ever-funny evaporation of Lib Dem votes come polling day? Alls I am saying is Thursday night shd still be good for some gut-churning tension.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 09:36 (fifteen years ago)
Talking about this to Mrs V this morning and we were both kinda getting wobbly in our resolution to not vote.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 09:39 (fifteen years ago)
if it were lab vs tory here i'd vote labour
apparently the lib dem candidate here was at my school, two years above me. which makes me a lot less like to vote for him on grounds of his youth and likely dickitude
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Monday, 3 May 2010 09:41 (fifteen years ago)
Apparently some people are too embarrassed to admit to pollsters that they will vote Tory.
1992 innit.
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 3 May 2010 09:44 (fifteen years ago)
And we all know what happened then.
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 3 May 2010 09:46 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.bl.uk/learning/images/front%20page/If%20Kinnick%20Wins-st.jpg
― Ned Trifle II, Monday, 3 May 2010 09:49 (fifteen years ago)
Does that attitude still persist? Wouldn't have thought so, given the ways of new labour.
― xyzzzz__, Monday, 3 May 2010 09:53 (fifteen years ago)
I'm noticing that in London at least, Boris Johnson was the gateway Tory for many white people who are libertarian about their own lives but authoritarian when it comes to others'. But what is worrying to me are the 25s and under from working-class/religious families of colour who don't remember Thatcher the way we do, mainly because their parents had a better Thatcherism than ours/we did.
― portmantovani (suzy), Monday, 3 May 2010 10:02 (fifteen years ago)
But what is worrying to me are the 25s and under from working-class/religious families of colour
huge tranche of the london electorate right there
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 10:07 (fifteen years ago)
if only there was a freudian term for this type of (res)sentiment....
i'm currently approx at the level of supporting inter at 80mins cuz barcelona aren't helping themselves and damn if i'm going to get upset on their behalf, but i'll still be disgusted by the vulgar display of power when the forces of darkness inevitably triumph
sort of thinking what to scribble on ballot (constituency too safe to need worry about actually voting)
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 10:21 (fifteen years ago)
my overseas vote turned out to be in the lib/con marginal, rather than the lib/lab super-marginal.
feeling ok about voting for dr evan harris mp, although all the FB posts telling me simon singh supports him aren't making it easy.
― caek, Monday, 3 May 2010 10:22 (fifteen years ago)
oh man "(res)sentiment"? really? points off for that dude. total cultural-studies douche-speak.
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Monday, 3 May 2010 10:24 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, tons of Londoners are like this! Some of them are younger friends working in fashion etc. and they've accepted the current social contract that requires them to be upbeat, 24/7 flexible, aspirational worker bees without having the time or inclination to maybe examine the bigger picture. Their lower middle class parents worked hard and did well, or they're posh and think the Queen is cuddly. There is also pressure on them to be 'all figured out' by age 25 in ways my generation did not require.
― portmantovani (suzy), Monday, 3 May 2010 10:25 (fifteen years ago)
young people are disgusting savages
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Monday, 3 May 2010 10:27 (fifteen years ago)
haha i thought i'd get u there (never gone *near* cultural studies, honest)
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 10:27 (fifteen years ago)
Well it still did in 2005. For 20 years now the Tories have always done better in results than the polls suggest,and Labour worse - even in 1997.
― nevermind312, Monday, 3 May 2010 10:30 (fifteen years ago)
maybe, but as a proportion of those who'll vote they'll be pretty small. probably be lucky if 50% of them actually vote and half of them will be for the fucking lib dems anyway.
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 10:30 (fifteen years ago)
this is probably my generation's greatest contribution to democracy right now
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3075/4559837858_9bee44223f.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4018/4544032498_c5698b2857.jpg
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 10:34 (fifteen years ago)
Actually, these people are well-behaved. Too well-behaved: they poo-pooh people who'd march against war, or for rights, because gov't being gov't is no great surprise to them, it's all a fix etc., and they are more worried about future employers' disapproval of any 'permanent record' than future gov't TBH. They will all vote now that the election is an EVENT.
People who are the children of political/war refugees rather than economic migrants (at least those I know) would never vote Tory. Interesting split.
― portmantovani (suzy), Monday, 3 May 2010 10:35 (fifteen years ago)
#2 all the way tho, poignant and concise while the first one looks like far too much effort (goldsmiths kids apparently, cult-studies degenerates most likely)
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 10:37 (fifteen years ago)
i don't even understand the "gay holidays" ref and yeah goldsmiths... fuckin goldsmiths
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Monday, 3 May 2010 10:38 (fifteen years ago)
that sort of apathy is common enough everywhere i'd guess
what do you mean by 'permanent record' tho, apart from criminal records, which a lot of people try to avoid
completely understandable though
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 10:43 (fifteen years ago)
mm, idk, lot of the diaspora from eastern europe back in the day was kinda pro-tory or ended up that way
etonian trotskyist perry anderson wrote a v influential and frankly racist essay saying so, "components of the national culture"
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Monday, 3 May 2010 10:46 (fifteen years ago)
as in 'old estonians'? yeah certainly ime, but plenty of residual trotskyism etc too
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 10:48 (fifteen years ago)
whut
no. he meant dudes like karl popper, lewis namier (iirc) &c. tom stoppard would be a more recent one. unrepentant stalinist eric hobsbawm would be a counterexample.
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Monday, 3 May 2010 10:49 (fifteen years ago)
'There were Etonians in Thatcher's first cabinet, but it appears that she didn't feel easy in their presence. In 1983, she sacked four of the most prominent Tory Etonians, prompting Macmillan's snobbish (and anti-semitic) mot about there being more Old Estonians than Old Etonians in the cabinet'
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 10:54 (fifteen years ago)
huh. that was a reference i did not know of.
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Monday, 3 May 2010 10:56 (fifteen years ago)
isiah berlin was from estonia or thereabouts too, but i'm guessing he didn't disturb macmillan's prejudice so much as keith joseph/nigel lawson types did
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 10:56 (fifteen years ago)
Surprised to learn Macmillan was even alive in the Thatcher years. Didn't he fight in the 1st World War?
― Zelda Zonk, Monday, 3 May 2010 11:02 (fifteen years ago)
Having just checked Wikipedia, indeed he did:
"During the Battle of the Somme, he spent an entire day wounded and lying in a slit trench with a bullet in his pelvis, reading the classical Greek playwright Aeschylus in the original language"
Don't make 'em like that any more, eh what?
― Zelda Zonk, Monday, 3 May 2010 11:04 (fifteen years ago)
there are still a tiny few ww1 vets still alive now, there were plenty still around in the 1980s. I can remember seeing boer war vets at the cenotaph on remembrance day back in the 70s.
I can remember when macmillan died (1986 I think)and I can remember some pretty unpleasant coverage of it from tory hacks in the press at the time as well.
― dead flower :( (Pashmina), Monday, 3 May 2010 11:07 (fifteen years ago)
not sure this has a lot to do with the people suzy is talking about tho
my limited experience of immigrants from palestine/iraq/colombia/congo etc wd correlate with her observation
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 11:08 (fifteen years ago)
how so?
I've no doubt that I'd be 180 degrees away from a fellow like Macmillan on any subject you'd care to name, but year, it's hard not to contrast someone who had first hand experience of being in a war, lived through the great depression and so on, with, well, a man who used to work in the PR industry. Probably a gross oversimplification, but, you know...
― dead flower :( (Pashmina), Monday, 3 May 2010 11:10 (fifteen years ago)
In the parlance of the day, Macmillan was a "wet". There were some pieces unfavourably comparing Macmillan with Thatcher in the tory broadsheets, it's along time ago, but my memory is that the style was somewhat snide and passive-aggressive.
― dead flower :( (Pashmina), Monday, 3 May 2010 11:12 (fifteen years ago)
"but year" = "but really" (?)
― dead flower :( (Pashmina), Monday, 3 May 2010 11:15 (fifteen years ago)
those miserable fucks never change
i don't think it's unreasonable to say that carrying norman lamont's papers and doing pr for itv probably isn't conducive to great worldly wisdom
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 11:16 (fifteen years ago)
macmillan was the best post-war Tory PM.
― nevermind312, Monday, 3 May 2010 11:27 (fifteen years ago)
in the land of the cunts etc
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 12:29 (fifteen years ago)
Here's three words to strike fear into everyone: LIB DEM FLASHMOB
http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=116948268334854&ref=ts
― Chris de Burgin' (King Boy Pato), Monday, 3 May 2010 12:36 (fifteen years ago)
Jeez...I'd hardly be Mourinho's biggest fan, but comparing him to 'Dave'?
― sonofstan, Monday, 3 May 2010 13:41 (fifteen years ago)
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Media/Pix/pictures/2010/4/30/1272647230807/National-daily-papers-par-001.jpg
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/may/03/election-2010-newspapers-influence-over-voters#
― caek, Monday, 3 May 2010 13:46 (fifteen years ago)
that was a low blow yes
with his knack for aphorism, visionary management style and suave good looks, only george osborne can really compare
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 13:50 (fifteen years ago)
The Express supported Labour in 2001?
― Gravel Puzzleworth, Monday, 3 May 2010 13:53 (fifteen years ago)
richard desmond around that time described himself as a socialist
and it had only recently been edited by rosie boycott -- presumably it was not as it is now then, but i can't remember
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Monday, 3 May 2010 13:55 (fifteen years ago)
WTF was up with the Madchester Grauniad in 1951?
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:07 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/apr/30/nick-clegg-my-hero-samuel-beckett
― max, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:12 (fifteen years ago)
Well, that explains his nihilist approach to policy.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:17 (fifteen years ago)
moar liek waiting for GORDON to FUCK OFF or something
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:18 (fifteen years ago)
On a seriouser night, I'm always a little baffled and confused when somebody can apparently engage with an all-time great like Beckett but apparently take from it the conclusion that being a Liberal Democrat MP is a valid response to the abyss.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:19 (fifteen years ago)
night? = note
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)
confused = sad
lol bank holiday brain
I like that he's gone for such a resolutely non-populist choice during an election campaign. You just know that Cameron/Brown would choose Ian McEwan or something.
― Zelda Zonk, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:24 (fifteen years ago)
Facking Ian McEwan, so bored of peeps at work and in the pab wanking awn about Ian Facking McEwan.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)
gb chose nelson mandela
― max, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)
due to anti-bigotry
― max, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)
alastair darling choosing laffin' leonard cohen was p cool imo
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)
I'm always a little baffled and confused when somebody can apparently engage with an all-time great like Beckett but apparently take from it the conclusion that being a Liberal Democrat MP is a valid response to the abyss.
it passes the time
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)
I will promise to vote Tory on Thursday if Osbourne mans up and chooses Sade.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)
Another odds curio re 'most votes': at all bookies bar one, lib dems are shorter odds than labour (tories massive favourites everywhere obviously). I'd also been assuming Clegg's ratings would evaporate come the big day, but there's money saying it won't.
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)
posting to ilx = valid response to the abyss
― jabba hands, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)
EXACKLY
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)
I'd also been assuming Clegg's ratings would evaporate come the big day, but there's money saying it won't.
See this is why Ladbroke's share price won't fall on Friday, whoever wins.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)
Vladimir: Let us not waste our time in idle discourse! (Pause. Vehemently.) Let us do something while we have the chance! It is not every day that we are needed. Not indeed that we personally are needed. Others would meet the case equally well, if not better. To all mankind they were addressed, those cries for help still ringing in our ears! But at this place, at this moment of time, all mankind is us, whether we like it or not. Let us make the most of it, before it is too late! Let us represent worthily for once the foul brood to which a cruel fate consigned us!
― max, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)
# Clov - servant of Hamm; unable to sit.# Nagg - Hamm's father; has no legs and lives in a trashcan.# Nell - Hamm's mother; has no legs and lives in a trashcan next to Nagg's.
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)
Clov + Nell + Nagg.....
coincidence?!
― max, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)
I'll vote Lib Dem. You must say words, as long as there are any - until they find me, until they vote for me. (Strange pain, strange sin!) You must vote Lib Dem. Perhaps it's done already. Perhaps they have voted for me already. Perhaps they have carried me to the threshold of my election, before the door that opens on Number 10. (That would surprise me, if it opens.) It will be I? It will be the silence, where I am? I don't know, I'll never know: in the silence you don't know. You must vote Lib Dem. I can't vote Lib Dem. I'll vote Lib Dem.
― Zelda Zonk, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)
I really want to know who Lembert Opik's fave author is now.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)
Come on, every Tory twunt below the age of 45 has a copy of Diamond Life, the yuppie's success soundtrack of 1984.
― portmantovani (suzy), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)
Daily Sport Stunna Kathy Acker xp
― max, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)
baronet de sade
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)
suzy, where you deliberately doing the joke from Se7en then?
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:40 (fifteen years ago)
lol i thought u meant the 80s singer too!
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)
IT'S A PIECE ABOUT BOOKS, GUYZ
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)
I've heard Sam Beckett's jazz-soul album and it was shit.
I've never seen Se7en, poor little me. To my eternal shame, I know someone who is friends with Osbourne - she is the daughter of a McCarthy film exile and her big brother is a British guy who contributes to The Corner. No names, and please don't add them if you figure it out, but AAAARGH.
I am LOLing because Clegg first learnt his Beckett in Minnesota rather than at Westminster with the future staff of the Idler. Or maybe Quantum Leap was in reruns at beer o'clock when he was in the US.
― portmantovani (suzy), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)
patricia welles is quite eccentric tho tbh
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)
(beatrice welles, soz, and crap joke anyway)
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)
somewhat sceptical of clegg reading godot quite that many times, short as it is
he has form in that area though
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)
Using the Guardian/ICM polls (http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2009/oct/21/icm-poll-data-labour-conservatives) this doesn't really seemt to be true:
1997 final poll: Lab 43, Con 33, LD 18 ; election result*: Lab 44.4, Con 31.4, LD 17.22001 final poll: Lab 43, Con 32, LD 19 ; election result*: Lab 42.0, Con 32.7, LD 18.82005 final poll: Lab 38, Con 32, LD 22 ; election result*: Lab 36.2, Con 33.2, LD 22.6
In fact the polls have been pretty much spot on. In 1997 they actually slightly underestimated the Labour vote and overestimated the Tories. Last time round you could say that about 1.5% were given to Labour that should have gone to the Tories, but this is still tiny and well within the margin of error. If only 1.5% of voters are secret Tories who lie to pollsters then it won't have that significant an effect.
*These don't quite match up with the percentages given in wikipedia - all three parties actually have marginally lower percentages (about 1% for Lab & Con and about 0.5% for LD) in each year. I assume that's because the overall results given in wikipedia include votes from Northern Ireland, but presumably ICM don't bother polling in Northern Ireland as it wouldn't really inform us at all about how people would vote in the rest of the UK.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Monday, 3 May 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)
Of course in 1992 it's almost certainly true* that there were many secret Tories who were too embarrased to admit the truth. The final poll predicted a dead heat (Lab & Con on 38%), but in reality the Tories won comfortably (Con 43, Lab 35).
*Either that or loads of people bottled it at the last minute and switched back to Major after seeing the Kinnock lightbulb thing.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Monday, 3 May 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)
How do the polls take account of 'undecideds'? I could see them jumping en masse for the tories in 92
― Ismael Klata, Monday, 3 May 2010 16:34 (fifteen years ago)
idk, by definition, almost, this is something you can't second guess
i'd aver that it isn't statistically that significant
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Monday, 3 May 2010 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
They don't count the don't knows and won't says. Or the won't votes, for that matter.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Monday, 3 May 2010 16:41 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, 1992 is the famous "shy tory" year
― caek, Monday, 3 May 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)
undecided people who claim they are certain to vote for someone are pretty rare, and i think most pollsters ignore them.
they also ignore anyone with doubts about voting, which i think a lot of undecideds are. they ask them how likely they are to vote on a scale, and then they only count the people who were certain/almost certain to vote (giving extra points for people who voted in the last election).
i think.
― caek, Monday, 3 May 2010 17:08 (fifteen years ago)
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/About/General/2010/5/3/1272892140005/Gordon-Brown-talks-to-Lab-006.jpg
vs
http://imgur.com/8Upqd.jpg
― James Mitchell, Monday, 3 May 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)
That's a very stirring rendition of 99 Red Balloons there, Gordon.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 3 May 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe this will solve my voting dilemma
http://www.giveyourvote.org/
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)
lolololol at the shit Sun Cover:
http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content/StaticFile/jpg/2010/May/Week1/15624644.jpg
But The Mirror's is a WIN:
http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content/StaticFile/jpg/2010/May/Week1/15624650.jpg
― nevermind312, Monday, 3 May 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)
oh wow his eyes
― ENERGY FOOD (en i see kay), Monday, 3 May 2010 22:28 (fifteen years ago)
This speech:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BA2Jz7xIXw
Almost enough to make me believe in him.
― James Mitchell, Monday, 3 May 2010 22:40 (fifteen years ago)
Such a cracking speech, that.
― stet, Monday, 3 May 2010 22:42 (fifteen years ago)
is there a bigger vn of that mirror front page online?
― lmbo slice (cozen), Monday, 3 May 2010 22:45 (fifteen years ago)
would have been a great speech from someone who hadn't occupied the two highest offices in the country for 13 years.
this is the author of the speech btw: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6832369.ece
wonder how she feels about university tuition fees now?
― joe, Monday, 3 May 2010 22:49 (fifteen years ago)
see ya, sue
― stet, Monday, 3 May 2010 22:52 (fifteen years ago)
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Monday, 3 May 2010 22:55 (fifteen years ago)
bits i heard from that speech were total cant. maybe i shd listen to the whole thing.
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Monday, 3 May 2010 23:06 (fifteen years ago)
Webekah's ex comes out for Brown
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/05/03/ross-kemp-vote-for-gordon-brown-and-save-britain-115875-22229478/
― mdskltr (blueski), Monday, 3 May 2010 23:10 (fifteen years ago)
A recent report commissioned by the Department of Health from McKinsey, the management consultancy, concluded that up to £700 million is spent annually on hospital procedures with limited clinical benefit, and about 40 per cent of patients in hospital at any one time do not need to be there.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article7115199.ece
― nakhchivan, Monday, 3 May 2010 23:34 (fifteen years ago)
smells like bullshit, but good to know we're paying fucking mckinsey for the privilege
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Monday, 3 May 2010 23:52 (fifteen years ago)
Well, those 13 years he does have a record on poverty that's more positive than negative -- even just the minimum wage on its own outdoes the other two. The tragedy of Brown has been his fear to be himself, and that has meant him appearing as this weak-seeming vacillating guy who is now washed up. Speech showed he could still be the old Brown, even if it turns into a swan song.
― stet, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 00:09 (fifteen years ago)
cozen
http://videos.icnetwork.co.uk/m4/Tactical%20voting%20guide.pdf
― henri grenouille (Frogman Henry), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 00:22 (fifteen years ago)
the 40% figure is kinda hilarious though ('it's absurdist theatre!' exclaimed mr clegg, sophomoricaly)
also typical times highlighting £700m of possible savings as if that wd amount to a fraction of the redundancy implied afterwards
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 00:22 (fifteen years ago)
― stet, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 01:09 (13 minutes ago) Bookmark
it's couched totally in the terms of an outside "change" candidate though. and when he gets to his record, it descends from "inspirational" rhetoric to... tax credits. but he's totally committed to the living wage, just before an election he's almost certain to lose. so that's ok! all this is ignoring the fact that inequality has increased under labour iirc. (had a depressing conversation last year with one of the authors of the 1983 manifesto and present-day labour stan arguing to me that inequality didn't matter any more.)
think i maybe sort of partly agree that the "tragedy of Brown has been his fear to be himself" but that's to say that he suppressed any principles he had in pursuit of power, and now is invoking all the things he formerly disavowed just to hold on to his rooms in the attic of desolate fulfilment.
― joe, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 00:50 (fifteen years ago)
That speech. It makes me so angry that Blair followed Smith and not Brown.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 01:32 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, the figures for the past few years aren't great -- but at the same time I don't think it's fair to say he disavowed his principles either. Just hid in the office with them, maybe.
― stet, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 01:45 (fifteen years ago)
you have got to be kidding. unless an embrace of market principles was, um, his principles.
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 06:55 (fifteen years ago)
bits i heard from that speech were total cant
You know there's an election on, right?
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 07:04 (fifteen years ago)
That Daily Mirror front page is somewhat illegal, I believe.
It's a very grey area regarding telling people how to vote in constituencies.
"UK People, Vote Labour" is alright.
"UK People, Vote Labour in Totteridge and Wetstone" is not.
― Mark G, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 08:18 (fifteen years ago)
Awesome: http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/armando-iannucci-the-duffy-affair-turned-the-media-into-a-pack--of-shrieking-gibbons-1961468.html
― portmantovani (suzy), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 08:23 (fifteen years ago)
Presumably all those party leaflets I keep getting that tell me to vote are illegal too then?
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 08:28 (fifteen years ago)
Apparently, via the MOS article, she did not object being called a bigot, but objected to being called "That woman"..
Story ends.
(xpost that's alright, they are from the party)
― Mark G, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 08:29 (fifteen years ago)
No sadly I think he believed 100% in the market until it was very nearly too late.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 08:31 (fifteen years ago)
Nah but fair play on Gordon Brown's record, the minimum wage plus tax credits and a couple of minor wars and the collapse of the international finance system on the back of a 100+ majority stacks up v. favourably compared to the Atlee government.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 08:31 (fifteen years ago)
THIS. All the clinging onto the myth of St Gordon the flawed socialist paladin who was thwarted by the system kind of overlooks that the bloke is naturally to the right of the likes of Healey and Jenkins ffs.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 08:33 (fifteen years ago)
A Labour Chancellor/Prime Minister who presided over near-total domination of Parliament and hasn't got the balls to talk about anything more ideological than "Fairness"...honest to christ what saps and lapdogs we've all been on the Left for the last 13 years.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 08:36 (fifteen years ago)
Think this comment from the New Statesman's thread on the subject is pretty OTM:
Any left-wing Rip Van Winkle who woke up two hours ago after a 20 year slumber and the first thing they heard was Brown's speech would vote for him in an instant. But you can't get past his record. Inequality as bad as ever, poverty persisting, policies pushed on poor countries that impede their development, the Iraq war, sucking up to big business. How do you square all that with the speech Brown made and the passion with which he gave it? I have no idea.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 08:43 (fifteen years ago)
It's also the sort of speech that Brown-as-Chancellor used to turn out at Labour conferences in order to make himself look like the Soul of Labour in contrast to Blair. If all else fails, try to look like a socialist, shore up that core vote. Extremely transparent.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 08:47 (fifteen years ago)
― max, Monday, January 4, 2010 6:48 AM Bookmark
― snoop dyao double-g (The Reverend), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 09:20 (fifteen years ago)
Commenter can't square it because it's playground logic. How can this man in a picture i've made for myself of a doer solely of terrible things also have passion and like fairness oh I am so confused.
Yeah, it's exactly the sort of speech he used to give in conferences. Whether it's genuine emotion or cynical manipulation is a whole other thing, but there's no way it's "extremely transparent": it's not hard to genuinely believe in fairness.
― stet, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 09:28 (fifteen years ago)
myself, i'm foursquare against fairness
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 09:28 (fifteen years ago)
But the problem with "fairness" is that it means something completely different depending on who's saying it. Everyone can fall back on it without saying much of substance - for Labour it means "equality of opportunity", for the LibDems a "rebalanced" tax system, for the Tories its not fair that "hard working people" pay taxes to subsidise "benefit cheats". It's a cop-out word.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 09:39 (fifteen years ago)
i'll hold fire on whether the guy is sincere or not, but i don't think his actions have been conducive to fairness
tax credits were amazingly badly managed and i don't understand why, instead of giving people back taxes (inaccurately! and then going after them later and claiming it back!) they didn't just tax poor people less
i don't think the minimum wage is a bad thing, but, well, there are tens or hundreds of thousands of people who work for a sub-minimum wage in the uk today
and apart from those two things im not really sure what the defensible record is. pfi? unthinkable levels of personal debt? light-touch regulation? detention without trial?
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 09:42 (fifteen years ago)
childrens' centreschild trust fundnursery money for 3-year-olds
brown has done a tremendous amount for under-fives, which is such a crucial area but also something that most politicians can (and do) just ignore
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 09:52 (fifteen years ago)
the under-fives have a consistently poor turnout record in general elections
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 09:58 (fifteen years ago)
The financial difference of having an under-five in the UK and having one in France is phenomenal, regardless of what Brown has or hasn't done.
― Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 10:00 (fifteen years ago)
not sure about the trust fund... feels kind of unnecessary, and it doesn't even seem to be means tested. everyone would agree that social class is the biggest determinant of life outcomes, but im not sure how giving 18 year olds a chunk of change (towards their tuition fees?) mitigates that.
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 10:02 (fifteen years ago)
xp parental migration is the next logical step.
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 10:03 (fifteen years ago)
Me: state-registered childminder in central Paris = 300 euros/month (state pays the rest)My brother: after months on a waiting list, finally got his daughter into a crèche (Hackney) = £700/month
― Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 10:08 (fifteen years ago)
Plus, school starts at the age of three in France.
― Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 10:12 (fifteen years ago)
happily, i have no ideas what childcare costs in ireland are- but i know that they're enormous.
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 10:13 (fifteen years ago)
the evidence increases for the importance of the earliest years in intellectual/lingustic/psychosocial development, so perhaps qualms about brown's efforts re equality would be best left to those future historians
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 10:14 (fifteen years ago)
A Fair Deal for British PeopleBritish Homes for British FamiliesBritish Jobs for British WorkersDecent People Not Corrupt PoliticiansEnd Afghan War Troops Home NowGet Your Own BackPutting Scottish People FirstScrap All Global Warming Hoax TaxesSupport Our Pensioners Support Our TroopsSupport Our Troops Bring Them HomeWith Nick Griffin Support Our TroopsIf you see ANY of the above names listed as the description of a candidate on the ballot paper they ARE British National Party BNP candidates, don’t be fooled into voting for the BNP when you don’t want to.
If you see ANY of the above names listed as the description of a candidate on the ballot paper they ARE British National Party BNP candidates, don’t be fooled into voting for the BNP when you don’t want to.
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 10:46 (fifteen years ago)
Sneaky BNP trying to get in the back door with the "With Nick Griffin Support Our Troops" party. Never would have guessed that one.
― Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 10:48 (fifteen years ago)
if they mean send nick griffin to afghanistan as a human shield i'm all for it
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 10:50 (fifteen years ago)
Get Your Own Back
― Mark G, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 10:50 (fifteen years ago)
Nationalising Dave Benson-Phillips FOR BRITAIN!
― carson dial, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 10:59 (fifteen years ago)
Putting Scottish People First
this is just Gordon Brown in a large moustache and glasses
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 11:01 (fifteen years ago)
would prob give 3rd 4th pref fob to global warming hoax dude tbh
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 11:04 (fifteen years ago)
Nick Griffin was on Radio Four the other day pretending to agree with Nick Clegg. I lolled.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 11:04 (fifteen years ago)
Griffin on the BBC? must be a weekday
― mdskltr (blueski), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 11:06 (fifteen years ago)
We got a very odd leaflet advising against a hung parliament.
From no particular party, but nicely printed on expensive cardboard...
― Mark G, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 11:07 (fifteen years ago)
somebody this morning was being interviewed in the west country, saying she couldn't make her mind up between nick clegg and nick griffin o_O
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 11:07 (fifteen years ago)
I really want to know who Lembert Opik's fave author is now.― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague),
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague),
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/arts/agoodread_past_programmes.shtml
Lembit Opik’s choiceOne Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
― mierda defensa ... no impedir ... espectador (onimo), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 11:08 (fifteen years ago)
British Jobs For British Workers, eh?
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 11:08 (fifteen years ago)
Wonder how the Labour candidates in Lib-Con marginals feel now Ed Balls and Peter Haine are open advising voting against them.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 11:08 (fifteen years ago)
don't want tories to win but if ed balls loses his seat (a real possibility) i'd be p happy. of course, he'd get the next safe seat by-election that comes up.
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 11:11 (fifteen years ago)
Tories are hoping Balls becomes their "Portillo Moment". But, much as Balls is a dick (so to speak), he's not quite in the same league as 90s era Portillo when it comes to smug repulsiveness
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 11:27 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.bectu.org.uk/news/773
not that that's any surprise
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 11:31 (fifteen years ago)
Some sort of bomb scare around Aldgate and Commercial Street?
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 11:59 (fifteen years ago)
so says twitter yea
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 12:02 (fifteen years ago)
http://imgur.com/ZxECD.jpg
http://imgur.com/kD7UO.jpg
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 12:02 (fifteen years ago)
Using real time social network Twitter, Sarah Modlock said: “Bomb disposal guys and dogs everywhere in Aldgate – fireman enlarging corden.”
he's fat enough already i'd have thought.
― joe, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 12:11 (fifteen years ago)
http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/3945/1272974982244.gif
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 12:14 (fifteen years ago)
Alert seems to be over. Staff being allowed back to their desks. #aldgate
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 12:16 (fifteen years ago)
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4012/4578174096_a058b4cf6f.jpg
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)
rarely is the question asked: is our children learning?
― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 13:22 (fifteen years ago)
omlg is that real?
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 13:36 (fifteen years ago)
I think I get just as annoyed with the scribbly tree logo as with the apostrolol.
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 13:41 (fifteen years ago)
She was only a grocer's apostrophe...
― portmantovani (suzy), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 13:46 (fifteen years ago)
Paddy Power has started paying out on a Tory victory already. They do this in football all the time and never get it right.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 13:48 (fifteen years ago)
I often wonder what it means when bookies do that; Paddy Power are still offering odds on various other aspects of the election which are mutually incompatible with the assumed Tory majority. Or, indeed, directly correlate with such a scenario. I assume they're not paying out automatically on any of these other bets (i.e., I could place a bet right now on "Conservatives having most seats" at 1/20; will they give me my (small amount of) money immediately?).
― Michael Jones, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 13:59 (fifteen years ago)
irish number crunchers well and truly found out at this stage tbh
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:01 (fifteen years ago)
Conservative Majority:Defeat or No Majority 4/52 to 20 seats 15/822 to 40 seats 11/442 to 60 seats 6/162 to 80 seats 16/182 to 100 seats 25/1Over 100 seats 22/1
Make up your bloody minds!
― Michael Jones, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:01 (fifteen years ago)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8659399.stm
What's the deal with this dude?
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:04 (fifteen years ago)
i'm not sure there are that many tactical voters, but
http://www.economist.com/blogs/bagehot/2010/05/tactical_voting
LABOUR'S concerted push on tactical voting this morning is desperate but not surprising. But will it be convincing? The argument is that to secure "progressive" reform, especially political reform, voters should vote to keep the Tories out. It is easy enough to see how this appeal might persuade some Labour supporters to vote Lib Dem; it seems much less clear that Lib Dem voters will be persuaded to vote Labour.The trouble is that this is an election in which, more than any other in recent British history, people will be paying close attention to the national vote-share figures. A big Lib Dem vote, likely to be wildly disproportionate to the number of Lib Dem seats, would help to advance the case for electoral reform that has gained increasing traction during the campaign. The higher the Lib Dem vote, the more indefensible the system will appear (though it will still be defended, of course). That is in addition to the other longer-term goals that might be served by Lib Dem voters sticking with their main preference.
The trouble is that this is an election in which, more than any other in recent British history, people will be paying close attention to the national vote-share figures. A big Lib Dem vote, likely to be wildly disproportionate to the number of Lib Dem seats, would help to advance the case for electoral reform that has gained increasing traction during the campaign. The higher the Lib Dem vote, the more indefensible the system will appear (though it will still be defended, of course). That is in addition to the other longer-term goals that might be served by Lib Dem voters sticking with their main preference.
― caek, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)
xpost, that Paddy Power thing is, if other ones are anything to go by, a promotional tool. Free advertising from papers that report it + more punters who see that sometimes they pay out on certain results before they've happened = greater revenue. There's a section about it in Flat Earth News, iirc.
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)
Thought as much. Also thought it might make sense for them to shut down certain markets early.
― Michael Jones, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:08 (fifteen years ago)
^^ that guy, Sood, is up against Bellingham who has been in for eons as far as I know. He's got no chance in a Tory safe seat, hence wanting a bit of publicity for himself. Sad really.
― mmmm, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:16 (fifteen years ago)
Lynn News - ELECTION: What the candidates are saying
Manish Sood
Manish Sood said: "I believe Gordon Brown has been the worst Prime Minister we have had in this country. Immigration has got worse, causingovercrowding and more people claiming benefits.
"We have got to get back to basics where people can leave theirmoney outside for the milkman without it being stolen." He has also pledged to control religious education and institutions, regenerate farming and industry and give more power to the police.
Mr Sood believes The Queen should have more powers and the death penaltyshould be re-introduced.
― Ladies and Gentlemen We Are Farting in Space (NickB), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:22 (fifteen years ago)
i'm not sure there are that many tactical voters
not voting tactically makes zero sense to me - but then i have encountered unexpected and o_0 tribalism over the past week
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:23 (fifteen years ago)
Hopeless xp. But then so is changing strategy two days before the election to urge tactical voting.
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:24 (fifteen years ago)
― Matt DC, Tuesday, May 4, 2010 3:04 PM (36 minutes ago) Bookmark
idk but if i were a labour party member in his hood i'd be thinking nailgun to the bollocks time tbh
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:43 (fifteen years ago)
not voting tactically makes zero sense to me
Lex your seat is not going to be decided by one vote anyway! So your vote is a way of saying 'this is how I want the area, and country to be governed' - it strikes me as a weird impulse to use it to tell a lie?
― Gravel Puzzleworth, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:44 (fifteen years ago)
psyched about casting my smoke signal
― ogmor, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:52 (fifteen years ago)
Last (only) time I was tempted to go "tactical", (A long time ago), the dude I was considering ended up third anyway.
― Mark G, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)
can ppl vote from hospital? can you blink your vote to a scribe? tactics.
― ogmor, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:58 (fifteen years ago)
is a lot easier for me to think "these guys are exactly what I do not believe in, anyone except them" than "these guys are exactly what I do believe in and I want my vote for them to be counted even if it doesn't 'mean' anything"
(wd not describe my vote as purely tactical but admit that it might very well be different in a different seat)
― xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:58 (fifteen years ago)
Hood member here! Hey, we're a broad church in Leicester. Lvrs and h8rs all welcome.
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 15:00 (fifteen years ago)
Lex your seat is not going to be decided by one vote anyway!
this is an argument almost exclusively used by people who can't be bothered to vote! i don't buy it - most things (elections or not) aren't decided outright by a single voice. it doesn't mean people should remain silent. also, that line of thinking gives us ralph fucking nader in 2001.
So your vote is a way of saying 'this is how I want the area, and country to be governed'
your vote is a number of things (in line with its having a number of separate consequences) - indeed those two things you mention aren't necessarily the same anyway. like spacecadet though i've always felt more strongly about who i don't want to have power than which of the two left-leaning parties does.
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)
I'd be very wary of labelling the LibDems as a left-leaning party when its still very possible they could be the ones who send David Cameron to number 10 by the end of the week. If you're voting tactically in a Lib-Lab marginal seat it probably makes more sense to vote Labour - if Labour do badly there's no way the LibDems will go into coalition with them.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:17 (fifteen years ago)
Stupid of any Labour minister to start talking about tactical voting, sounds desperate and, anyway, do they think we're so stupid we hadn't thought of it already by ourselves?
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)
The most amusing thing about the Manish Sood thing was his mum tellying him what a naughty boy he was in the national media.
I am coming think from a progressive point of view a small Tory majority would be better than a hung parliament. If an hung parliament fails to deliver cameron can blame the LDs, however a small tory majority means Cameron is going to have to spend a lot of time parcelling out patronage to hold things together and he's going to get backed into doing unpopular things. I still think the tories are sublimating their internal divisions rather than dealing with them and it wouldn't take a large faction to destabilise a tory government.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:24 (fifteen years ago)
A minority Tory government would be better than either surely?
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)
American elections interjection here but my senator won by 300 votes after a protracted recount, with absentee voters most likely responsible for making the difference. Since I am one of those and I voted for him, *damn* did my vote matter. I live in a safe Labour seat but even so, if you're thinking of not voting please do me the courtesy of doing it anyway in exchange for all those not-Republicans votes I cast via US my absentee ballot.
Ed, if the Tories get in they'll do the US right thing of claiming a mandate no matter how big the majority. BTW check the Turner Prize noms, you may be all smiles.
― portmantovani (suzy), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
I'm in a super-safe Labour seat, so my vote's all about the national share anyway. So Labour to avoid them coming third in the popular vote, or LD to make them as strong as possible if they end up with the Tories, then.
― stet, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
not to mention the mervyn king "whoever wins will make their party unelectable for a generation" warning etc
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)
*damn* did my vote matter
it didn't really though? he'd still have won by 299?
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
I prefer to think of my single vote as the one that pushed Al Franken over the edge of WIN. It's more fun that way.
― portmantovani (suzy), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:37 (fifteen years ago)
ok, i was worried i was missing something fairly obvious there. phew..
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)
"Lord Mandelson tells the BBC that Labour candidate Manish Sood, who described Gordon Brown as "the worst prime minister" Britain has had, is "a couple of sandwiches short of a picnic"."
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)
never change mandelsonnnnn
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)
Depends on how long Cameron can get away with blaming Brown for. I'm thinking a good two years.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:59 (fifteen years ago)
how long did labour get away with blaming the tories for?
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 17:01 (fifteen years ago)
they still do it from time to time
prob hasn't worked since 2003 or so
― nakhchivan, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 17:02 (fifteen years ago)
Conservative Future
Urge... to kill... rising...
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 17:03 (fifteen years ago)
Essentially the next 5yrs or so of Parliamentary debate are going to be the Tories cutting or selling everything they can get their hands on and every time they're criticised will respond with "we don't have any money and its your fault". The budget deficit is manna from heaven for them really.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 18:41 (fifteen years ago)
xpost when I get elected I'm moving to have all of these people turned into punching bags.
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 18:59 (fifteen years ago)
Brown gave another really fiery speech today. Go Flash Gordon!
& latest YouGov poll:
Conservative 35% (NC); Labour 30% (+2); Liberal Democrats 24% (-4)
Labour would have the most seats.
― nevermind312, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)
think they (ie ed balls) was foolish to make the penultimate day of campaigning about the sordid business of tactical voting. people in con vs lib seats should be allowed their head. a whole media cycle given over to it, and not only that, on the split in labour on the issue. matt dc otm, the "big society" goes way beyond addressing the deficit. labour should have stayed on that message.
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)
I wouldn't've thought anyone was paying attention now to be honest. From about an hour into the third debate the only thing left was for the newspapers to declare.
(can't believe Labour have a hope in hell of getting most seats now xp)
― Ismael Klata, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 22:15 (fifteen years ago)
I'm trying to figure out what to do on Thursday - ideally I'd like to be getting VERY hammered with friends - whatever the outcome.
Remember, also, that a lot of people will have done protest votes at the council level for Lib Dems and have seen what they're like. If it's anything like Camden, where control gave them a big excuse to sell off some of the nicest council housing right in the pits of recession and privatise a bunch of services that really need to be done direcly by the council, people won't be swayed by all the warm fuzziness that Clegg is trying to project. Don't doubt for a second that the guy is OK personally, and I like Cable, but...no.
― portmantovani (suzy), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 22:18 (fifteen years ago)
Those lot are lightweights. These are the real deal. The Young Britons' Foundation!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuWXnBqAPvg
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 22:25 (fifteen years ago)
xpost ya, over my way a Lib Dem council overspent ridiculously in their first year and ended up passing off a lot of their services to a useless housing agency. Worked out well during the BIG FREEZE when no one could decide who should be dealing with it, thus rendering half of the area completely off bounds. Probably not changing anything here specifically, since the 2005 result saw Labour get over 50% of the vote, but Camden sure isn't an isolated case.
― FC Tom Tomsk Club (Merdeyeux), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)
http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content/StaticFile/jpg/2010/May/Week1/15625462.jpg
http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content/StaticFile/jpg/2010/May/Week1/15625444.jpg
http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content/StaticFile/jpg/2010/May/Week1/15625443.jpg
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 04:34 (fifteen years ago)
At least the cartoon on the front of the Express is better than the one on the front of the Mail.
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 04:35 (fifteen years ago)
can't wait for the Sun's headline tomorrow.
wonder if they'll try and make another "Kinnock moment".
― nevermind312, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 06:49 (fifteen years ago)
Funny, the Mail's gone "Red"!
― Mark G, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 07:08 (fifteen years ago)
"Why your vote could save page 3"
― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 08:09 (fifteen years ago)
The switch from Scottishness to Englishness is an underlying theme of this election... I have spent the bank holiday in Oxfordshire, and it is full of people who look like David Cameron. They are cheerful and self-reliant. They do not look angry and tormented and Scottish.
― manish pseud (cozen), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 08:28 (fifteen years ago)
Crypto-fascist asshole: they're also HIDEOUSLY WHITE.
― portmantovani (suzy), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 08:49 (fifteen years ago)
well i never
http://www.slate.com/id/2252742/
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 08:49 (fifteen years ago)
lol Hitchens is such a suck-up.. trading on Clegg-o-mania when he has actually been quoted saying that he can't remember Clegg from his days at The Nation at all
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 09:05 (fifteen years ago)
Like Hitch can remember anybody from last month.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 09:22 (fifteen years ago)
Simon Cowell plus 'vote here to save page 3 despite the fact it's lasted through 13 years of Labour government' is pretty desperate stuff.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 09:29 (fifteen years ago)
It's the editorial equivalent of hoofing it up to the big lad.
Every time they're criticised will respond with "we don't have any money and its your fault". The budget deficit is manna from heaven for them really.
― Matt DC, 04 May 2010 18:41 (Yesterday
Price of having being a pretty shitty govt.
Lot of people itt *hoping like fuck* the tories will be worse. No wonder it's a gloomy election.
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 09:29 (fifteen years ago)
beloved public figure simon cowell votes tory? why, that's given me pause.
thought every1 hated that guy, not in an ironic way. wonder how gordon ramsey votes.
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 09:34 (fifteen years ago)
I'm passed gloomy now man, looking forward to being blasé with a dash of vengeful "fuck you, you get the government you deserve" come Friday.
Mind, we've always had the government we deserve. Fuck the joke of a last 13 years "hey at least it was better than it wd've been under a Dalek government".
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 09:34 (fifteen years ago)
They take from the medium poor togive to the needy poorVia the government poorGive it to the poor poor
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 09:36 (fifteen years ago)
Mark E. on the fucking money 25 years in advance tbh
REVOLUTION
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 09:38 (fifteen years ago)
through message board
Sarah Sands obviously has read the Simon Cowell rave which is all about making UK more like the USA. Cameron truly is an Everyman.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 09:39 (fifteen years ago)
HASN'T read - that should be, godammit.
That makes a difference.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 09:40 (fifteen years ago)
nah you were right the first time tbh I'm so fucking depressed
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 09:44 (fifteen years ago)
was gonna take the day off yesterday to head down to dublin for a protest march against the entire govt. just about everyone i know thought it was a dumb idea, and their lack of interest in the whole sorry mess knocked the stuffing out of me more than their actual opinion one way or the other.
yeah, depressing.
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 09:52 (fifteen years ago)
Were there going to be other people on this march?
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 09:54 (fifteen years ago)
^ the kind of negative attitude that prevents REAL change imo
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 09:55 (fifteen years ago)
The only thing I'm consoling myself with now is anticipating the ferocity of the backlash once Cameron has got over the shortest honeymoon period in the history of incoming governments.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 09:58 (fifteen years ago)
i can't believe we'll have a tory government
that's what's keeping me going
idk, i grew up in the SE, but in one of the few non-tory seats. always surprised to see how much of the region is coloured blue. so not really attuned to reality.
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:00 (fifteen years ago)
How long will Osborne last in govt? Surely he'll be the first to go.
― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:01 (fifteen years ago)
No, we will all be the first to go, straight under the carpet folks.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:03 (fifteen years ago)
as long as his mummy lets him, presumably
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:04 (fifteen years ago)
"george! when you are QUITE through pretending to be a politician come in here and have your supper and then it's straight to bed with you"
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:05 (fifteen years ago)
He'll be a useful fall guy for Cameron. In charge of getting the cuts through, will become a demonised character the width and breadth of the land, then get booted out in exchange for "a safe pair of hands"
― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:07 (fifteen years ago)
I still think they'll get a majority of about twenty. But yeah, horrific backlash ahoy - expect that party to have basically the equivalent internal division as Labour, but without the big majority & national consensus to make tongue-holding worthwhile. I'd've thought another election soon pretty likely, either to increase the majority or because parliament gets unmanageable.
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:09 (fifteen years ago)
will become a demonised character the width and breadth of the land
silver lining: this will be tremendous fun, to partake in and to witness
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:10 (fifteen years ago)
Indeed. Osborne won't know what's hit him. He's going to make Norman Lamont look like a national treasure.
― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:12 (fifteen years ago)
tbh it's going to be shit, austerity measures-wise, whoever wins
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:14 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, heard it all before.
Basically, there's going to be a party. And if you're not invited, your face won't be in the pictures.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:15 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjOr9vYg9dQ
http://www.bloggerheads.com/archives/2010/05/nadine_dorries_18.asp
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:25 (fifteen years ago)
So, let's be positive...
What *could* happen?
LibDems hold balance, court the Cons as they had the biggest vote/seat total, get told "No deal on PR" the libs go "hey, no sweat", they coexist for a bit, Cons go "stuff this for a game of solds", quit and force an election, meanwhile GBrown retires and the new leader gets the popular vote, and so on.
Our Amber was bemoaning how she can't vote, I told her she'd miss out on the next one but would be old enough for the one after that. At which point she pointed out that she'd be 20, and that her younger sister (our Alice) would be voting as well. which was SO UNFAIR apparently.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:31 (fifteen years ago)
"it's not even flit-wick it's flit-ick!!!!"
― manish pseud (cozen), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:35 (fifteen years ago)
The best scenario is Tories form a minority govt, Lib/Lab initially hold their fire, Tories become massively unpopular, new election in a year's time, Tories are massacred.
― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:39 (fifteen years ago)
The best scenario involves some kind of super-virulent but very short-lived localized anthrax outbreak.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:42 (fifteen years ago)
They'll have closed down your post office by Monday NV, your parcel will never get through.
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:54 (fifteen years ago)
The other side: tories get in, identify some strong-with-unions-unpopular-with-public sector to start cuts, unions posture as part of labour leadership process, new election, public thinks 'sod this', gives tories proper majority
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:55 (fifteen years ago)
http://imgur.com/xcmPJ.jpg
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:56 (fifteen years ago)
The Jacob Weisberg piece in Slate is more worthwhile than Hitch, but contains this enthralling example of I See What You Did There:
The only thing that prepared me for a Saturday in the North with Gordon Brown was reading Michael Lewis' The Big Short, which is about the people who made a fortune betting against the housing bubble. Lewis' characters are social misfits, and the best of them is Michael Burry, who attributes his social awkwardness to having lost the sight in one eye as the result of a childhood illness. As the book goes on, it becomes increasingly difficult to believe that Burry's difficulties making friends, his angry explosions, and his inability to deal with other people come from growing up with a glass eye. Eventually he discovers that his problems aren't to do with his eyesight all. He has Asperger's syndrome.
― portmantovani (suzy), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:57 (fifteen years ago)
He's looking for something to hide his Daily Mail in xp
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:57 (fifteen years ago)
Tim Ireland's pursuit of Dorries does verge on the obsessive thorough but no-one deserves it more than her.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:59 (fifteen years ago)
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, May 5, 2010 11:55 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark
or: labour gets in, dependent on flaky lib-lab pact, is forced by the iron laws of economics/IMF to cut public sector pay, unions posture as part of "being unions", tories force vote of no confidence, new election, thatcher wins
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 10:59 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, I can't stand the idea of Cameron even getting his foot in the door but a Lib/Lab coalition that does some deeply unpopular but maybe necessary stuff and gets clobbered come the autumn is perhaps just slightly worse. Also, a Con minority gov't would get such a free ride from the press (in contrast to the relentless tide of anti-Brown bile on the newsstands these last two years) that the honeymoon could be indefinitely extended.
― Michael Jones, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:10 (fifteen years ago)
simon jenkins make the p sound point that the more powerful the lib dems get, the less they'll want PR, coz it will condemn us to bullshit european-style coalition politics forever, and even they won't want that, if they can inflate their vote sufficiently by normal means.
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:13 (fifteen years ago)
to step back a little, it does seem kinda fucked that the two 'left' parties will gain the majority of the vote yet there'll probably be a tory govt of some description
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:16 (fifteen years ago)
can there just be a con/lab/lib coalition? they're all the same anyway amirite
― show me your buccina (ken c), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:17 (fifteen years ago)
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, May 5, 2010 12:16 PM (42 seconds ago) Bookmark
i haven't actually been following the election THAT closely... why is a lib-lab keep-the-tories-out coalish less likely than this?
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:18 (fifteen years ago)
the bookies? the 'punditocracy'? i dunno, but whether now or in the near future when a fratricidal lib/lab coalition collapses
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:20 (fifteen years ago)
cameron 1/5 to be pm on june 5th
(imperfect metric etc etc)
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:22 (fifteen years ago)
It's a bit of a stretch to call the Lib Dems "left" isn't it? They're a mishmash of some left ideas but also some libertarian instincts.
― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:22 (fifteen years ago)
" 'left' "
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:23 (fifteen years ago)
It's a bit of a stretch to call the Lib Dems LABOUR "left" isn't it? HIYOOOOO
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:24 (fifteen years ago)
these are all relative descriptors and yeah i'm sure to a maoist it's all rizla thin gradations
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:25 (fifteen years ago)
to ken, there are occasionally left-right "grand coalitions" in countries with PR, but i really don't see that happening here. too adverserial.
― caek, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:25 (fifteen years ago)
nvr listened to bookies. their main shit, horse racing, is all fixed, and anyway their thing is to make money, not to accurately predict results.
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:26 (fifteen years ago)
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, May 5, 2010 12:25 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark
im not a maoist (i just revolution a lot) but they're still some mighty fine distinctions. on foreign policy the lib dems are more conventionally "left" than labour, and on tax too imo. remember the whole 10p thing?
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:28 (fifteen years ago)
the bookies will fairly accurately cleave to the voter projections (see also 538 etc) but obv have no insight into whatever cloistered intrigue happens in wminster in the next fortnight
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:29 (fifteen years ago)
a Con minority gov't would get such a free ride from the press (in contrast to the relentless tide of anti-Brown bile on the newsstands these last two years) that the honeymoon could be indefinitely extended.
this is a given, really, isn't it?
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:30 (fifteen years ago)
Amber otm.
― snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:31 (fifteen years ago)
Free rides from the press tend not to last long if the government is either inept or hugely unpopular, or both.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:33 (fifteen years ago)
should be votes every year. on everything.
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:33 (fifteen years ago)
xp ok not a 'free' ride but certainly at a serious discount.
also- the 'it's all your fault' line will last longer than you'd expect.
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:34 (fifteen years ago)
I mean, newspaper owners naturally lean pro-Tory, but not if their government is doing so badly its harming their business interests. Look at the way they set about Major post-92. (xpost)
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:34 (fifteen years ago)
― Matt DC, Wednesday, May 5, 2010 12:33 PM (45 seconds ago) Bookmark
yeah. anyone recall the "honeymoon period" in 1992?
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:34 (fifteen years ago)
im not a maoist
no you don't give that impression it has to be said
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:35 (fifteen years ago)
i do not recall 1992
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:36 (fifteen years ago)
where were u
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:36 (fifteen years ago)
if Lab do shittily, people declare them out of the game at the next election...+ LDs cosy up to Tories hoping for magic ticket of "electoral reform", remain cosy when told they can't have it (or it's put to a vote/referendum worded so that it'll never win), LD voters feel betrayed...+ Tory govt forces unpopular cuts through, splits all over the place re modernisation/Europe/environment, honeymoon ends, their popularity plummets too...
...does anything exciting and new happen at this mass disillusionment in all 3 parties, or is disillusionment in the face of an intractable status quo just par for the course in British politics?
― xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:42 (fifteen years ago)
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 12:33 (5 minutes ago) Bookmark
every week, on facebook.
― tomofthenest, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:42 (fifteen years ago)
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Wednesday, May 5, 2010 11:13 AM (20 minutes ago) Bookmark
'Normal' Only you lot and the US think it's normal to have such a distorted mandate.
― sonofstan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:42 (fifteen years ago)
in 1992 i was in the proverbial short pants enjoying longer summers iirc
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:44 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/05/hung-parliament-could-work-well-for.html
I hope DC isn't reading this.
― mierda defensa ... no impedir ... espectador (onimo), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:45 (fifteen years ago)
does anything exciting and new happen at this mass disillusionment in all 3 parties, or is disillusionment in the face of an intractable status quo just par for the course in British politics?
this is a good question that i have been pondering. pls for older & more knowledgeable ilxors to enlighten on whether this kind of thing is cyclical or is there any likelihood of a meaningful change out of all this?
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:45 (fifteen years ago)
Only you lot and the US think it's normal to have such a distorted mandate.
― sonofstan, Wednesday, May 5, 2010 12:42 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark
"only" us and the US, huh?
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:46 (fifteen years ago)
Johann Hari is really spoiling us at the moment: Welcome to Cameronland
― portmantovani (suzy), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:46 (fifteen years ago)
also kiribati and the harrogate choral appreciation society xp
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:48 (fifteen years ago)
I have spent the bank holiday in Oxfordshire, and it is full of people who look like David Cameron. <- I deny everything!(though if dude really wants to say Scottish people are pessimists who sigh deeply over small amounts of work, that is this Oxfordshire ILXor to a T)
Personally I dunno how people can listen to Cameron speak and not be reminded of every smugly petty jobsworth who has ever assured them everything would be fine then fucked them over and lied about it, just because they can, but obviously a lot of people either don't see that or think it's as close as this election offers to good leadership.
― xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:48 (fifteen years ago)
did cameron have to move left to so colsely emulate blair, or was blair just there already?
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:49 (fifteen years ago)
Ok, 1992 was different - long-term govt stumbling to a collapse aided and abetted by insane interest rates/falling pound/ERM business. This time it's a "change". I wonder if Thatcher could've survived in '79 with the small maj Cameron might be able to get; the opposition was in meltdown back then, mind, but she was immensely unpopular pre-Falklands (not that you'd have known it from the non-Mirror tabs).
xxxp
― Michael Jones, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:49 (fifteen years ago)
I don't buy that. They'd have to get massively more popular to have even a sniff of forming a majority on their own.
Welcome to 1983, 1987, 1992...
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:50 (fifteen years ago)
I can't off the top of my head think of another major developed world democracy that uses a straight first past the post voting system for their general elections
― Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:52 (fifteen years ago)
there aren't that many comparable major developed world democracies period
i mean, yeah we could be more like germany?
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:54 (fifteen years ago)
that alone isn't evidence for its inefficacy
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:56 (fifteen years ago)
please nobody mention the Falklands or North Sea oil again as I am kind of afraid that an initially unpopular Cameron govt will get its equivalent of these and be swept to immense new victories and claims of "real strong leader, that's what we need" forever
(chews fingernails)
― xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:56 (fifteen years ago)
Think I should ask the mods to remove the words "kind of" from all of my posts.
― xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:57 (fifteen years ago)
there are different kinds of kind of
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 11:58 (fifteen years ago)
the current electoral system allows for lib/lab coalitions, it's more extraneous factors (the press, ingrained bloodymindedness) that wd question its legitimacy
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 12:00 (fifteen years ago)
/does anything exciting and new happen at this mass disillusionment in all 3 parties, or is disillusionment in the face of an intractable status quo just par for the course in British politics?/this is a good question that i have been pondering. pls for older & more knowledgeable ilxors to enlighten on whether this kind of thing is cyclical or is there any likelihood of a meaningful change out of all this?
Fairly difficult to predict massive ideological shifts like the Labour movement, or post Reform Act Tories, or Thatcherism accurately other than in retrospect I guess.
What I wd say is that with limited funds and the need for big cuts, wdn't be surprised if we saw considerable social unrest (all those state cuts in N Ireland/NE Cam was talking about will have effect of massive unemployment/poverty for instance) and consequently a reinjection of idealism into the parties.
The working industrial base, however, that used to provide most of Labour's votes has been massively eroded, and, well, I sketchily think they're being sold the dream of aspirational society and that this kind of reinforces a strongly capitalistic, Tory model.
So, ah, no idea. Pretty sketchy I know. But hey, I'm still cowering in bed with an emperor-sized hangover.
― Remember me, but o! forget my feet (GamalielRatsey), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 12:07 (fifteen years ago)
the current electoral system allows for lib/lab coalitions newly selected party leaders to become prime ministers without people whinging about "unelected" and "no mandate" on and bloody on, oh wait
― xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 12:17 (fifteen years ago)
What happened to all that oil that might be in the Falklands? That could be a double whammy. Would also eventually come in quite useful in helping pay down the deficit later down the line.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 12:29 (fifteen years ago)
way too many for-real here imo http://search.twitter.com/search?q=%23imvotingconservative
― stet, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 12:29 (fifteen years ago)
mamaanne: #imvotingconservative because they've created new jobs. They need people to hold their gold cufflinks while they roll up their sleeves.
― mierda defensa ... no impedir ... espectador (onimo), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 12:32 (fifteen years ago)
joskinner: RT @Redfoxi: #imvotingconservative cause Danny Dyer said he'd cut me if I didn't
Nice cross twitter campaigning going on there.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 12:34 (fifteen years ago)
"#imvotingconservative because I own a top hat shop and I smell a MASSIVE opportunity"
― koogs, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 12:34 (fifteen years ago)
Let them form a workers' co-operative to distribute cake on a voluntary basis http://bit.ly/aqyBRy thats #bigsociety for you #imvotinglabour
― portmantovani (suzy), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 12:36 (fifteen years ago)
o_O @ Danny Dyerhttp://yfrog.com/2gwxsj
― mierda defensa ... no impedir ... espectador (onimo), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 12:36 (fifteen years ago)
Hey, if there is a coalition parliament involving your LDs, does that mean Lembit Opik becomes the Secretary of Daily Sport Stunnas?
― Chris de Burgin' (King Boy Pato), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 12:37 (fifteen years ago)
countcube: #imvotingconservative because the Daleks aren't too bad (David Tennant and Peter Davison are for labour - 2 ex-Doctors)
I get it!!!!
― MPx4A, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 12:40 (fifteen years ago)
fucking hell facebook people, it's a johann hari article. does he say that people in hammersmith actually want to be bombed or something?*
*he once said iraqis wanted to be bombed
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 13:19 (fifteen years ago)
Any port in a storm.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 17:17 (Yesterday)
STOP CONFUSING ME
― Mansun was where I fucked up (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 13:31 (fifteen years ago)
It is confusing, I think I'll just let Ed Balls tell me who to vote for
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 13:33 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1272512/20-000-benefits-father-seven-children-video-games--pay-huge-booze-bill.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
― manish pseud (cozen), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 13:44 (fifteen years ago)
lol you have the daily mail in your rss
― caek, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 13:44 (fifteen years ago)
The Daily Mail? In MY RSS?
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 13:46 (fifteen years ago)
up the RSS corner
― manish pseud (cozen), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 13:47 (fifteen years ago)
― Mansun was where I fucked up (acoleuthic), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 13:47 (fifteen years ago)
got a vending machine rigged up in my flat to spew out crisps whenever the daily mail uses certain words
― manish pseud (cozen), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 13:50 (fifteen years ago)
Seriously beginning to think Lib Dems could go close in my constituency, wondering if I can drink enough gin to make me vote between leaving work on Thursday and the polling stations shutting.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 13:50 (fifteen years ago)
Chelsea Ann Stamford Bridge?!?!
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/mar/16/uk-greece-style-unrest-nick-clegg-spending-cuts
ne1 remember this?
― the subject of many paedo's thoughts (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)
xxp, do it! it will be lols. if you get really drunk you can always just draw a dobber on your ballot.
― caek, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 13:52 (fifteen years ago)
Ballot's full of dobbers already iirc
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 13:53 (fifteen years ago)
This is nice, 'pologies if it's been linked to before
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 14:51 (fifteen years ago)
David Cameron's plans mean children will die... And that is a good thing
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 14:56 (fifteen years ago)
Here's a list of countries that use first past the post voting - apart from the UK and US, Canada is the only rich western country I can spot - so yes, you guys are the exceptions. * Antigua and Barbuda * Azerbaijan * Bahamas * Bangladesh * Barbados * Belize * Bhutan * Botswana * Canada * Dominica * Ethiopia * The Gambia * Ghana * Grenada * India (Proportional representation in upper house) * Iran * Jamaica * Kenya * Kuwait * Lebanon * Malawi * Malaysia * Mexico * Federated States of Micronesia * Morocco * Nepal * Nigeria * Pakistan * Palau * Papua New Guinea * Philippines * Saint Kitts and Nevis * Saint Lucia * Saint Vincent and the Grenadines * Samoa * Singapore * Solomon Islands * South Korea * Swaziland * Tanzania * Tonga * Trinidad and Tobago * Tuvalu * Uganda * United Kingdom (National parliamentary and local government elections in England and Wales only, not in elections for the EU Parliament, the Scottish Parliament, the Welsh and Northern Irish Assemblies, the London Mayor and Assembly, and local elections in Scotland and Northern Ireland) * United States (except for Louisiana and Washington) * Yemen * Zambia * Zimbabwe
― sonofstan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:08 (fifteen years ago)
no, no, you're not getting it
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)
Britannia on a cliff edge on that Mail cover is the British equivalent to the Statue of Liberty crying in the Onion editorial cartoons.
― Haunted Clocks For Sale (Dorianlynskey), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:18 (fifteen years ago)
considering voting labour as a kind of acte gratuit
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:21 (fifteen years ago)
Expect Balls to pop up on telly any minute playing the acte gratuit card
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)
heard d-cam talking about talking to some "literally" floating voters the spaz
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)
Hey, they might have been in a swimming pool for all you know.
― Mark G, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)
Postal vote from the Spacelab innit
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)
http://depletedcranium.com/YogicFlyingSm.jpg
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)
He's working so hard to capture your vote, he's actually been in outer space (xp)
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, Natural Life aren't standing this time around are they? (xpost)
― Mark G, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)
I think you'll find they're levitating instead
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)
only just saw thishttp://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/31346/ed-balls-nazi-costume-attacked-video
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)
so who here lives in a marginal seat area?
i forgot to register for where i live now (camden holborn st pancras) so i'm still registered for islington north. both of them should be safely Labour (the other candidates are all dicks/crap) but actually i like Corbyn more than Dobson
― show me your buccina (ken c), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)
Pretty sure I don't live in a marginal seat although recent polls have Lib Dems gaining a bit.
I have to find my polling card, I know it's around somewhere...
― a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)
apparently you don't need it? (i hope not as i no longer actually live in finsbury park so have no polling card)
― show me your buccina (ken c), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)
think you just need to bring ID/sweet talk the old lady
It's either the Greens or the Tories or Labour here (Brighton Pavilion, currently Labour). God knows which way it'll go. Greens are massively ahead on posters in people's windows, then Labour.
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)
was in oxford east, which is a lib/lab super-marginal, but have been allocated proxy vote in oxford west which is lib/con fairly marginal with redrawn boundaries that will probably favour the tories. voting ukip anyway so none of this concerns me.
― caek, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)
This is nice, 'pologies if it's been linked to before― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:51 Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:51 Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8609989.stm
v interesting. I know uniform swings don't really count for anything but by my reckoning if Labour can manage get something like 28% of the vote there's no way the Tories get a majority without a complete collapse of the Lib Dem vote.
The latest poll of polls has Con 35, Lab 29. LD 26, Other 10 which imo isn't an unrealistic outcome and would give Labour 2 seats more than the Tories, 54 short of a majority, with the Lib Dems having 79 seats to bargain with.
― mierda defensa ... no impedir ... espectador (onimo), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)
Giving up on predicting best/worst outcomes, tbf. Live in safe LD land, that's not gonna change, so outcomes don't matter. Any other considerations just depress me. I'm assuming there can be a good outcome, it will happen, and my worrying won't affect it one way or the other. So I can sleep.
― textbook blows on the head (dowd), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)
uniform swing is usually pretty reliable, except in scotland, although a more significant third party may complicate things.
― caek, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)
Here in NE Fife we've been Lib/Dem for 23 years, with 50+% of the vote. Which is maybe why we only get 5 parties here - not even a Green candidate or any loltrots. :(
― textbook blows on the head (dowd), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:12 (fifteen years ago)
I miss living in NE Fife.
― JimD, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:12 (fifteen years ago)
Whereabouts? NE Fife/ E Fife have never had a Labour MP, which is odd considering W Fife had a CP MP for ages.
― textbook blows on the head (dowd), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)
Oh, I wasn't there long, I'm just x-stndrws.
― JimD, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)
Figured - cool.
― textbook blows on the head (dowd), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:17 (fifteen years ago)
God knows which way it'll go. Greens are massively ahead on posters in people's windows
that ain't very green of them is it?
― show me your buccina (ken c), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)
there's actually just one poster and it's passed on to a new flat every six hours.
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)
the posters are made of bogeys
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
which are themselves recycled from other bogeys
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)
Bethnal Green & Bow here, guessing I have to vote Labour to keep Respect out. Can't see the Tories or Lib Dems making up the 10,000 votes they were behind last time. Or is it now a "four way marginal" like everyone keeps saying?
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:39 (fifteen years ago)
I'm in a marginal, hence my labour vote even though they deserve a kicking
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
Which polls, Colonel? I assumed Walthamstow was very safe Labour.
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)
I think they were polls undertaken by the Lib Dems tbh. They reckon Labour 37%, Lib Dem 30%.
― a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)
My friend's website:
http://www.polarimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Pinocchio-Cameron_full.jpg
― portmantovani (suzy), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)
US mocks our 'Harry Potter' election
Is this true? Is it mocked or just completely ignored across the pond?
― nevermind312, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)
what the hell is that article about
― max, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 17:50 (fifteen years ago)
"the us mocked the election... BUT MAYBE IT IS THE US WHO IS A RACIST"
― max, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 17:51 (fifteen years ago)
I have no idea but she's right about the Jon Stewart bit, it was weak.
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 18:40 (fifteen years ago)
Anyone who can guess the completely unexpected guest who pops up at 3:40 into this video gets a pat on the back
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5JttnDggWb8
Anyone who remembers it from the first time around should tuned until 9:30 for a guest appearance by Alistair Darling's eyebrows.
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 19:33 (fifteen years ago)
Haha. And no reaction from Dimbleby at all - it looks like it's been edited in at random afterwards.
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)
Has this been discussed:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/election_2010/8638381.stm
Three British National Party (BNP) candidates in Wales will not be using the party's name on ballot papers at the general election, it has emerged.Instead BNP candidates in Swansea East, Swansea West and Gower will appear as "Support Our Troops Bring Them Home".
Vile.
― Not the real Village People, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)
How can they get away with that? If they're BNP candidates, then surely they must be named as such on the ballot paper.
― Venga, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)
something similar was posted upthread. Fuck these pricks.
A Fair Deal for British People British Homes for British Families British Jobs for British Workers Decent People Not Corrupt Politicians End Afghan War Troops Home Now Get Your Own Back Putting Scottish People First Scrap All Global Warming Hoax Taxes Support Our Pensioners Support Our Troops Support Our Troops Bring Them Home With Nick Griffin Support Our Troops If you see ANY of the above names listed as the description of a candidate on the ballot paper they ARE British National Party BNP candidates, don’t be fooled into voting for the BNP when you don’t want to.http://www.vote-no-to-bnp.org.uk/2010/04/dont-be-fooled-on-may-6th-you-could-be-voting-bnp-without-knowing-it.html#cTxlFVoTnTRk― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 11:46 Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
http://www.vote-no-to-bnp.org.uk/2010/04/dont-be-fooled-on-may-6th-you-could-be-voting-bnp-without-knowing-it.html#cTxlFVoTnTRk
― James Mitchell, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 11:46 Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― mierda defensa ... no impedir ... espectador (onimo), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)
There's this story too:
Apparently Nick Griffin just been hit with tomatoes by kids as he was out canvassing in Barking. According to witnesses he got into his car and left pretty quickly. However, according to one witness, things quickly became more serious: "Moments later on Harrow Road members of the BNP party who were standing in the road were approached by a group of five Asian boys and one black boy. The boys asked what the party members were doing in their area. One of the members of the BNP party then punched one of the group of boys in the face. The boy said then about six or seven members of the BNP party then proceeded to attack him and his friend. After this the men all jumped into a car and drove off."
― nevermind312, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)
They were hanging around Whitecross Street market (between the Barbican and Old Street) yesterday lunchtime. One of them punched a woman in the back of the head after the police turned up to tell them to fuck off home.
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)
always instructive that the football posts outweigh the politics ones, even a day before dumbsday.
― thousands of masturbating weirdos (whatever), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:34 (fifteen years ago)
I'm in the US, would like to watch the 'alternative' election coverage tomorrow (either live or shortly after), anyone know if I can do this short of getting someone to put their laptop in front of a telly and Skype me?Failing that is the proper coverage streamable?
― Not the real Village People, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)
Won't the proper coverage be on CSPAN?
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:38 (fifteen years ago)
I imagine this relates to James post upthread.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4gpHnEXZJY
― Ned Trifle II, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:39 (fifteen years ago)
there hasn't been ENOUGH talk about pragmatic day to day issues like bus passes imo
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)
oh god seeing preview of jeremy vine's awful graphics on newsnight
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)
maybe ppl think spurs/city was more interesting than newsnight has been so far
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)
shit innit xp
jeremy vine is a wrongun
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:55 (fifteen years ago)
tv psephologists scarcely more dignified than tv astrologists tho
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:56 (fifteen years ago)
http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content/StaticFile/jpg/2010/May/Week1/15626204.jpg
Fairey/AP lawyers on line 2, I hope...
― carson dial, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:57 (fifteen years ago)
sun frontpage is shitty obama-poster'd Cameron. bleh
― stet, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:58 (fifteen years ago)
xp!
is that forreal?!
― nevermind312, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:58 (fifteen years ago)
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 22:54 (54 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
tbh you fuckers already know who you are voting and this thread got tl;dr while i was out earlier. i'm busier annoying the shit out of my possible tory voting friends that hey, they still have cunts who won't even treat the public as equal and equate some of our best friends as comparable to having a mental illness for the way they were born - and if they can't get simple equality right, fuck 'em on any actual politics always instructive that the football posts outweigh the politics ones, even a day before dumbsday. ps. fuck phillippa stroud it can never be said enough.
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:58 (fifteen years ago)
obamacam looking v. phantom of the opera.
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)
btw, just on the Mirror website, and I love how on referring to that Simon Cowell story in The Sun today said:
"The multi-millionaire used the pages of a downmarket right-wing newspaper to come out for David Cameron."
lol @ "down-market" coming from The Mirror. still, totally right tho.
― nevermind312, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 22:02 (fifteen years ago)
spurs/city was indeed a lot better than this shit, lest that weren't obvious
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 22:04 (fifteen years ago)
I got the top half of the Sun cover as I scrolled down, thought it was Hitler
― Ismael Klata, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)
since when did hitler have a forehead the size of the sudetenland
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 22:10 (fifteen years ago)
He really does look like a thumb.
― portmantovani (suzy), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 22:22 (fifteen years ago)
ok i might be buying some Suns tomorrow just to burn them in public
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 22:23 (fifteen years ago)
Afucking+ trolling etc.
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 22:24 (fifteen years ago)
http://web5.twitpic.com/img/96331711-f87b4ab275aefac70503de5c41c2395f.4be1f03e-full.jpg
― portmantovani (suzy), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 22:25 (fifteen years ago)
http://base58.com/ilx/fuckthesun.jpg
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 22:43 (fifteen years ago)
the concentration of ethical and aesthetic vileness in one shitty little rag never ceases to disgust
cunts the lot of them
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 22:50 (fifteen years ago)
NV, hideipvpn.com + zattoo should see you right, I'll be using it
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 22:53 (fifteen years ago)
zattoo have lost their BBC coverage ;_;
― manish pseud (cozen), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:01 (fifteen years ago)
tvcatchup.com will do tho
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FnmnuDiVno
Parodies are appearing thick and fast now. Lots of anti-Tory sentiment trending on Twitter, very little pro-Tory presence. Combination of sizable rump being elderly, not so web savvy voters, and the fact that, generally speaking, it's still shameful to admit to being Tory?
― Hang Parliament (DavidM), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:02 (fifteen years ago)
http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s236/mezxspectrum/96349674.jpg
weak
― Hang Parliament (DavidM), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:07 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzubqUAK9uo
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:16 (fifteen years ago)
mirror front page is indeed weak
he might be a fatfaced choad, but cameron has had an irl job; saying is wife is posh is weak sauce; and just a fair few labour PMs and current ministers are public school/oxford
they should have just reproduced the "i've never voted conservative before because i'm not a cunt" poster
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:24 (fifteen years ago)
BNP candidate attacks kid in Barking
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:25 (fifteen years ago)
Okay so the UKIP candidate in solid Tory seat Thirsk & Malton has died.
Which means the election there won't take place until May 27th. Notionally, this could make a difference, right?
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:42 (fifteen years ago)
im going to go ahead and predict that if any kind of anti-tory coalition comes into being, ukip will not be on the bus
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:43 (fifteen years ago)
You don't understand.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:45 (fifteen years ago)
indeed i don't!
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:46 (fifteen years ago)
Could be important if Tories are relying on DUP to make up the numbers rather than the LDs.
Another thing, would Sinn Fein take their seats (swearing an oath to the queen) to fuck shit up for the tories and Unionists? Almost definitely not but it would be fun if they did.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:47 (fifteen years ago)
So the actual Mirror front page is...
http://imgur.com/3l0H0.jpg
― James Mitchell, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:47 (fifteen years ago)
I meant more that this is one supposedly safe Tory seat that won't be declared any time soon. And if somehow Dave is one seat short of a majority?
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:47 (fifteen years ago)
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, May 6, 2010 12:47 AM (20 seconds ago) Bookmark
yeah... not really though. i mean, given that one of 'em ordered the murder of the guy who introduced her to her husband, it would probably be more awkward than fun.
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:51 (fifteen years ago)
sniffiness aside, at least some of us got an actual result in the football.
xp sinn fein won't be swearing any oaths. you must have them....mixed up with someone else?
― scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:54 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/zimbabwe/7370383/Robert-Mugabe-gives-David-Cameron-election-backing.html
yeah, no shit
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:54 (fifteen years ago)
And if somehow Dave is one seat short of a majority?
nice mandelsonian euphemism there
― nakhchivan, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:55 (fifteen years ago)
has to have been used in The Thick Of It already
― mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 23:56 (fifteen years ago)
the sitting MP is still the MP, i think
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Thursday, 6 May 2010 00:01 (fifteen years ago)
It's a new constituency so there isn't a sitting MP.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 6 May 2010 00:07 (fifteen years ago)
"Conservatives are bold, Blair and Brown run away when they see me, but not these fools, they know how to relate to others."
Amazing quote.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 May 2010 00:11 (fifteen years ago)
Polly Toynbee: It was Goodbye Gordon. But a sniff in the air, a whisper of hope, a prayer. Could this be a 1992 moment?
who can really say?
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Thursday, 6 May 2010 00:19 (fifteen years ago)
or are we in for the Clegg/Harman dream ticket?
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 6 May 2010 00:20 (fifteen years ago)
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Thursday, 6 May 2010 01:19 (3 minutes ago) Bookmark
she's just writing new labour fanfic now
― joe, Thursday, 6 May 2010 00:28 (fifteen years ago)
So, today has taught me that the Expess is the "greatest newspaper in the world'
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/5/5/1273099855212/Election-Day-Front-Pages-001.jpg
Daily Mail still cunts
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/gallery/2010/may/06/general-election-2010-newspapers-front-pages?picture=362252684
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 6 May 2010 04:07 (fifteen years ago)
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/5/5/1273099926037/Election-Day-Front-Pages-002.jpg
Possibly the most posed photo ever taken:
http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01038/SNN0605AAN-682_1038211a.jpg
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 6 May 2010 05:49 (fifteen years ago)
I think it was "literal" swing voters. I was gonna come and do a Dave Mellor gag but I was busy making tea.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 May 2010 06:47 (fifteen years ago)
Is cameron holding an airbrushed out gun there?
― Mark G, Thursday, 6 May 2010 06:58 (fifteen years ago)
Usually he has his man fetch the papers - no wonder he's confused.
― portmantovani (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 07:01 (fifteen years ago)
We got handwritten letters from our Lab candidate yesterday telling us that tactical voting was rubbish and if we all voted for him, and he got a significant number of defectors from both other parties, he could maybe push the Tories into third. His conclusion was "only us or the Lib Dems can win", which was an interetsing one. Scraping into second != challenging for the seat.
― THE QUEST IS THE QUEST (aldo), Thursday, 6 May 2010 07:02 (fifteen years ago)
To do list today:
Work (boo)Fucking driving lesson (boo)BUY GIN (ray)???lolz
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 May 2010 07:09 (fifteen years ago)
^ you forgot the important thing you had to do today?
post to ilx.
― henri grenouille (Frogman Henry), Thursday, 6 May 2010 07:11 (fifteen years ago)
ILX Exit Poll (UK General Election 2010)
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 6 May 2010 07:13 (fifteen years ago)
lol i still don't know which constituency i'll end up voting in (and hence who i'll be voting for)
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Thursday, 6 May 2010 07:16 (fifteen years ago)
I always get so stoked on election day, even when I'm pretty sure I'll spend it listening to other people going "yeah! I'm not voting either! they're all the same!!!" and smhing
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 May 2010 07:22 (fifteen years ago)
^^^ sometimes refered to as the Eurovision strategy
― he speak the frenche as the Frenches himselves (snoball), Thursday, 6 May 2010 07:23 (fifteen years ago)
There are signs up in my local garages saying it's now an offence to use a mobile on the premises. I applaud Cameron's civil disobedience there.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 6 May 2010 07:26 (fifteen years ago)
I'm divided between HOW is that an offence and WHY.
― portmantovani (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 07:31 (fifteen years ago)
I saw the ep of Mythbusters where they proved that the mobile phones/petrol fumes thing was a load of old bollocks tbh
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 May 2010 07:31 (fifteen years ago)
Have Cameron arrested under the Prevention of Terrorism Act for attempting to cause an explosion at a petrol station?
Cam: "B.b.but I was going to win an election today!"cop: "Not any more, sonny!"
― he speak the frenche as the Frenches himselves (snoball), Thursday, 6 May 2010 07:34 (fifteen years ago)
The hospital ban on mobiles seemed to have more to do with maximising revenues for the dreadful, expensive bedside phone system in use in so many of them.
― portmantovani (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 07:37 (fifteen years ago)
oh THAT's the Eurstrat. Wondered...
― Mark G, Thursday, 6 May 2010 07:38 (fifteen years ago)
Ignore earlier link, go to this one:ILX Exit Poll (UK General Election 2010) - new version!
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 6 May 2010 07:39 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, I don't believe that mobile thing's an offence either xp, but given this government's hunger for criminalising things and introducing deliberately vague laws that turn out to mean something that no-one foresaw in advance*, I can't entirely discount it.
* I suspect I might be alone here, but this is my no.1 reason for wanting shot of Labour. It's the combination of petty authoritarianism, posturing, actions without regard for consequences, and trivialising something (the criminal law) that should be taken seriously that gets me. I mean, I was brought up frightened of the police and all that and I'll do whatever I can not to be a criminal, but at least two cabinet ministers have been convicted of crimes in the last year and neither of them bothered resigning, so fuck them for making me feel awkward about shit like this.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 6 May 2010 07:53 (fifteen years ago)
You seriously think ministers should resign because they commit any offence?
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:12 (fifteen years ago)
Yes I do, is that strange? I also think that things should only be a criminal offence if they're serious matters - I wouldn't necessarily want ministers resigning for not keeping copies of their housekeepers' passports or for nudging another car while reverse parking, but if they turn them into things worth prosecuting then they themselves ought to take them seriously in my view.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:21 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think it's strange, just unreasonable.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:28 (fifteen years ago)
The BBC Election Night Party Pack is one of the more depressing things I've encountered so far. Can't bring myself to download it in case it actually drives me over the edge. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8662468.stm
― textbook blows on the head (dowd), Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:33 (fifteen years ago)
Shouldn't that Daily Mail front page scare people away from Dave's austerity measures?
― mierda defensa ... no impedir ... espectador (onimo), Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:34 (fifteen years ago)
agree w/ ismael -- if it's unreasonable, then don't make these things criminal offences
this -- the insane amount of legislation brought in by new labour -- is an issue that has been ceded to the right for no good reason
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:34 (fifteen years ago)
onimo otm, the logic of the DM front page is tarded
Best argument for BBC cuts yet.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:38 (fifteen years ago)
I did the deed before work, there was hardly anyone there.
― a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:39 (fifteen years ago)
i think this is the first time i've had to queue. which scares me a little.
― koogs, Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:41 (fifteen years ago)
Nigel Farage is in hospital because HIS AIRCRAFT CRASHED. Whatnthefuck?
― sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:44 (fifteen years ago)
Shouldn't that Daily Mail front page scare people away from Dave's austerity measures?― mierda defensa ... no impedir ... espectador (onimo), Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:34 (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― mierda defensa ... no impedir ... espectador (onimo), Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:34 (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Yeah, I thought that....
― Mark G, Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:45 (fifteen years ago)
The Sun's front page portrait is a thing of beauty.
Seriously.
― Mark G, Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:46 (fifteen years ago)
― sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, May 6, 2010 9:44 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark
"minor injuries" unfortunately
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:46 (fifteen years ago)
I just looked up the independent candidate to see if he was one of those secret BNP candidates (since we didn't have an actual BNP candidate) but he's just some 9/11 truth nut.
― a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:47 (fifteen years ago)
we have more than one nutty independent, but one in particular dresses like the guy in "v for vendetta" and makes a big deal out of the fact our labour candidate has a german (jewish?) surname.
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:48 (fifteen years ago)
Aircraft in question got tangled up in UKIP banner BTW. SchadenLOL.
― sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:54 (fifteen years ago)
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA awesome. Finally a UKIP dude has done something that makes me proud to be British.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 May 2010 08:55 (fifteen years ago)
What are we talking about here? Things that ministers have actually done that is illegal or things they've made criminal which they shouldn't? Because if you think someone should resign because they've, I don't know, accidently driven the wrong way up a one-way street then that's just the same kind of pettiness that you're complaining about. And yes, I think there should be a law against driving the wrong way up a one way street. I just don't think breaking it that one time is a reason you should lose your job. It's reasonable that you should be fined, get some points, maybe.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:01 (fifteen years ago)
knowingly employing an illegal immigrant, as baroness scotland did, has been a criminal (not civil) offence since 2006
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:06 (fifteen years ago)
So now you're saying people who haven't actually been found guilty of an offence should resign?
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:08 (fifteen years ago)
Sorry, cock-up I thought she wasn't fined. But she was, carry on.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:09 (fifteen years ago)
So yeah, she should have gone and I don't know why she didn't. But Ismael started with "crimes" (no distinction between civil and criminal offences) which is what I was objecting to.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:12 (fifteen years ago)
I meant criminal offences - not sure if driving up a one-way street is a crime or not, but I think it's generally understood that most driving matters are in their own category. It's the heavy-handedness of using criminal offences for fundamentally unserious stuff that I hate most, it can only end by undermining respect for the whole idea of not committing crimes.
It's personally pissed me off because I recently found out (boring story ahoy) that I had to register for data protection because at (self-employed) work I compile a document from time to time with someone's names & address on it, and that for ages I'd been committing a crime by doing so without being registered. And then I have to pay for registering into the bargain, for which neither I nor anyone else will ever get any benefit.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:29 (fifteen years ago)
Anybody else got this?
http://imgur.com/Y2ARF.jpg
Law breaking cunts.
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:32 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.impawards.com/1971/posters/decameron.jpg
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:33 (fifteen years ago)
even the guardian took against the idea of having all parents who drove other people's kids to football (or whatever) would have to (pay to) get a CRB check
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:38 (fifteen years ago)
It's the heavy-handedness of using criminal offences for fundamentally unserious stuff that I hate most, it can only end by undermining respect for the whole idea of not committing crimes.
How is it fundamentally unserious? Most illegal immigrants are not employed in parliamentary offices, they're employed because they can work below the minimum wage and in substandard conditions.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:39 (fifteen years ago)
At one end of the scale you get Baroness Scotland, at the other you get Morcambe Bay cockle pickers.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:40 (fifteen years ago)
Yes, but all those cockle fishermen, vegetable growers are fine, respectable small businessmen, the very heart's blood of this once great nation of ours
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:42 (fifteen years ago)
How is it fundamentally unserious?
i'd say it's complicated. the labour govt tacitly accepted illegal immigration; to punish individual (small) employers for employing illegal immigrants, ie for not doing the border agency's nominal job, we're in some tricky territory.
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:43 (fifteen years ago)
anyway, if it is that serious then baroness scotland should have resigned. if it isn't then it shouldn't be a criminal offence.
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:44 (fifteen years ago)
to punish individual (small) employers for employing illegal immigrants
Yeah, like this happens. And who gives a fuck how small they are?
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:45 (fifteen years ago)
I don't really care much about Baroness Scotland, but I believe the person she employed lied to her and provided false documentation, so I can't blame her entirely
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:48 (fifteen years ago)
Invoking small business is the primary stick the right always uses to bash any kind of employment legislation.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:49 (fifteen years ago)
But, funnily enough, they never ask who it is that's employing all these illegal immigrants, failed asylim seekers, Johnny Foreigners etc
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:51 (fifteen years ago)
They're all cocklefarmers imo.
― Stevie T, Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:57 (fifteen years ago)
both sides are being intensely hypocritical. does the "left" (in this case meaning labour supporters) want employers to report illegal immigrants (as is their legal duty under this legislaation) rather than employ them?
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Thursday, 6 May 2010 09:58 (fifteen years ago)
Just been and voted for what it's worth!
― not_goodwin, Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:00 (fifteen years ago)
Uhhhhhh, because we want everyone, no matter what their origin, to be paid a decent wage and not be exploited by a bunch of grasping cunts? (xp)
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:01 (fifteen years ago)
Tom D OTM.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:02 (fifteen years ago)
right, but brown has ruled out an amnesty so...?
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:03 (fifteen years ago)
Anyway, I can't really be arsed today with your usual the-sky-is-green the-sea-is-pink style of arguing
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:04 (fifteen years ago)
Politicians 'ruling things out' hardly a barrier to same things getting done eventually, or even by those same politicians.
― sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:05 (fifteen years ago)
... no offence, like
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:06 (fifteen years ago)
i think you don't have an answer, is all
hmmmmm
― Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:06 (fifteen years ago)
What distinction are you drawing between "doing the border agency's nominal job" ie turning them away, and deporting them again?
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:06 (fifteen years ago)
I didn't vote Brown
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:09 (fifteen years ago)
And in what way is it "hypocritical" to want asylum seekers to be able to live here legally and simultaenously want to prevent employers from exploiting them? This is sub-Nick Cohen at best.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:12 (fifteen years ago)
to punish any crime is basically punishing someone for not doing the nominal job of the police (stop crime). Well no fucking wonder this country is down the pan.
― show me your buccina (ken c), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:13 (fifteen years ago)
the labour govt tacitly accepted illegal immigration
Now that's the major crime here
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:15 (fifteen years ago)
xxp asylum seekers aren't illegal immigrants. they should be able to work, given the inadequacy of the state provision for them. but they're not really what you're arguing about, i don't think.
― joe, Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:16 (fifteen years ago)
Let's just call them refugees. What was wrong with that?
― sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:18 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah bad choice on my part. But there's no inherent conflict between opposing authoritarian govt posturing on immigration and also supporting laws criminalising employers who exploit illegal immigrants. And yes, I know every illegal immigrant in Britain isn't employed below the minimum wage.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:22 (fifteen years ago)
But, I think the point seems to be, that you can't "support" Labour in that case
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:23 (fifteen years ago)
I expect Baroness Scotland paid at least 50p over the minimum wage. Have the tories said what they're going to do about that piece of legislation by the way?
― Ned Trifle (Notinmyname), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:25 (fifteen years ago)
It'll be 8 year olds up chimneys next thing, youmarkmywords
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:27 (fifteen years ago)
the tories said they were wrong about the mininum wage and it doesn't stop job creation. but i wouldn't expect to see it increase.
― joe, Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:28 (fifteen years ago)
the tories said they were wrong about the mininum wage and it doesn't stop job creation
I wondered if they've asked all those business leaders and representatives of small businesses who came out against LABOUR'S JOB TAX what they think
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:30 (fifteen years ago)
I love how whenever Cameron says "JOB TAX" everyone just pretends they didn't hear it.
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:31 (fifteen years ago)
It'd be difficult for a Tory gov to abolish the minimum wage immediately. But not so difficult for them to let it die over a longer period.
But no worries, they're not gonna win. I got a feeling.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:31 (fifteen years ago)
^ crazy man
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:32 (fifteen years ago)
Is there some kind of JOB TAX on the horizon? I've not managed to hear about that. Weird.
Stevem's Sun cover remix is getting great play amongst some of my more writerly Facebook friends. NB this happened before I got a chance to say it ROCKS.
― sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:33 (fifteen years ago)
The Guardian's front page today was a smart move tactically I think. Get the anti-Tory vote out by making an outright Cameron victory look a real possibility.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:36 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, I always assume this is the same reason the right wing Sundays tend to run the polls that flatter Labour most.
― Daily Sport Stunna Yasmin Alibhai Brown (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:37 (fifteen years ago)
> all those business leaders and representatives of small businesses
one of those who signed that Times letter was my boss. was interviewed in the office by al jazeera tv(!) on the back of it.
(aforementioned job tax being the increase in NI payments, i believe - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8592144.stm )
― koogs, Thursday, 6 May 2010 10:58 (fifteen years ago)
OUCH
http://web20.twitpic.com/img/96551187-03f3606cc2640d513132f6cb7499ec77.4be2a1f3-full.png
― sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:04 (fifteen years ago)
Blimey, poor old Nige
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:05 (fifteen years ago)
And here I thought he was the ultimate in Sockless Loafer Man.
― sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:06 (fifteen years ago)
Any idea if volcanic ash was involved?
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:07 (fifteen years ago)
You could say their campaign...came crashing to the ground!
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Politics/Pix/pictures/2010/5/6/1273142763278/Screengrab-from-BBC-news--006.jpg
― Chris de Burgin' (King Boy Pato), Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:10 (fifteen years ago)
from the guardian: "Nigel was unconscious but he can talk."
― joe, Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:12 (fifteen years ago)
My brain almost broke on that statement.
― sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:13 (fifteen years ago)
A bit like Lord Pearson then
― Football's Flocking Home (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:14 (fifteen years ago)
http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE6451J320100506
A UKIP spokesman said Farage had not been seriously hurt but might have some broken bones.
"Nigel's got a thick skin," the UKIP spokesman said.
― Hang Parliament (DavidM), Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:16 (fifteen years ago)
Thats what you get for fucking with the unwritten rules of parliamentary democracy.
― Ned Trifle (Notinmyname), Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:16 (fifteen years ago)
just got back from voting for my friend and very occasional ILM poster. he's the Green candidate though, so it'll be a while before the first ILX MP.
― zappi, Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:33 (fifteen years ago)
What else could go wrong for David Cameron in the next 6 months?Message BookmarkedBookmark RemovedNot all messages are displayed: show all messages (1725 of them)What else could go wrong for Gordon Brown in the next six months?Message BookmarkedBookmark RemovedNot all messages are displayed: show all messages (2075 of them)
What else could go wrong for Gordon Brown in the next six months?Message BookmarkedBookmark RemovedNot all messages are displayed: show all messages (2075 of them)
ILE predicts a hung parliament.
― State Attorney Foxhart Cubycheck (Billy Dods), Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:40 (fifteen years ago)
I accidentally set fire to our house last night and had to call the fire brigade out. After extinguishing the small inferno in our kitchen, one of the crew nodded at our Vote Green poster and said: 'If you want to keep service like that, I wouldn't vote for that lot'. Still no idea what he meant.
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:47 (fifteen years ago)
How is your house doing this morning? You clumsy bastard.
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:49 (fifteen years ago)
Smoky. Our stove is kaputt and the children's lunchboxes are no more :(
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:51 (fifteen years ago)
http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s236/mezxspectrum/x2_1447750.jpg
Banner at Cameron's local polling station in Witney, Oxfordshire. It reads "Britons Know Your Place. Vote Eton - Vote Tory"
― Hang Parliament (DavidM), Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:53 (fifteen years ago)
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Thursday, 6 May 2010 11:47 (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
probably thought voting green would let the Tories in?
― show me your buccina (ken c), Thursday, 6 May 2010 12:01 (fifteen years ago)
or thinks they'd have to use Green Goddesses powered by hemp
― mdskltr (blueski), Thursday, 6 May 2010 12:02 (fifteen years ago)
Fire is part of Mother Nature, let it run its course without human intervention
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 12:03 (fifteen years ago)
you'd be made to plant trees to make up for the carbon footprint of the fire you caused
― show me your buccina (ken c), Thursday, 6 May 2010 12:05 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe it's some sort of malicious hosepipe ban rumour.
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Thursday, 6 May 2010 12:07 (fifteen years ago)
lol at this twat btw:
12.24pm: And now for a bit of novelty. Press Association's Chris Montcrieff reports that a candidate whose surname is "Above" and whose "Other Names" are given as "None Of The" is contesting the election in Chingford and Woodford Green, the seat being defended by Iain Duncan Smith, the former Conservative leader.
Unfortunately for "Mr Above" he appears, for alphabetical reasons, at the top of the list of candidates, with no one above him.
It might have been wiser for him to have renamed himself "Below", which would at least have put him second in a list of eight candidates.
The mystery candidate gives his address on the ballot paper as Woodberry Way, North Chingford.
znone of the, zabove
― show me your buccina (ken c), Thursday, 6 May 2010 12:17 (fifteen years ago)
I suppose it'll make sense when they publish the results.
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Thursday, 6 May 2010 12:21 (fifteen years ago)
sorry i just burnt yr house down
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)
green party = loves naturefire = naturalgreen party = loves fire
― max, Thursday, 6 May 2010 12:44 (fifteen years ago)
... and hates human beings, you missed out that bit
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 12:45 (fifteen years ago)
green party- hopeless incompetent fuckwits when in govt, simpler reading.
― Get fourth and multiply (darraghmac), Thursday, 6 May 2010 12:46 (fifteen years ago)
as opposed to the tories amirite?
oh, i'm not :(
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 12:47 (fifteen years ago)
Haha, awesome.
I'm considering standing next time with the sole policy that after the election I will destroy the UK with a massive fireball. Worried about education? Don't worry, you'll be dead. Worried about immigration? Don't worry, you'll be dead. Worried about pensions? Don't worry, you'll be dead. A SURE-FIRE winner.
― emil.y, Thursday, 6 May 2010 13:35 (fifteen years ago)
Not ILXers so far as I know, but I have two pals, and Mrs K a third, who are standing at this election quite independently of one another. All tories. Of these, one will get in, one probably won't, and the third is up against one of the more popular members of the cabinet so really shouldn't and I'll be quite annoyed if he does.
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 6 May 2010 13:37 (fifteen years ago)
You're friends with a Tory?
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 13:39 (fifteen years ago)
Oh my, I've just checked out who zappi was talking about - I didn't know he was standing, that is awesome. Dude put out some of our music!
― emil.y, Thursday, 6 May 2010 13:42 (fifteen years ago)
I've been teasing the hell out of my school friend who went to BBYO future leaders summer camp with Grant Shapps. He's craaaaaaaaaaaap.
― sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 13:43 (fifteen years ago)
Dude put out some of our music!
Who he?
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 13:43 (fifteen years ago)
Don't know if we should sully his google search results with the craziness that is ilx, so, in googleproofed form: D4v3 D!x3y, L31cest3r.
― emil.y, Thursday, 6 May 2010 13:46 (fifteen years ago)
Only local govt but one of the local Tory councillors in my childhood home was a friend of my parents'. Went to vote one year and she greeted me with "hello Josephine, so glad you could turn up to vote for us".
(I am not called Josephine, and no, I didn't)
― xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 6 May 2010 13:49 (fifteen years ago)
Don't know if we should sully his google search results with the craziness that is ilx
Yes, better safe than sorry
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)
emil.y, he was outside the polling station when i went. we talked about Ronnie Slicker and the Banditz, an obscure Leicester punk band featuring future members of Crazyhead - only just got the terrible pun in the band name (R. Slicker)
― zappi, Thursday, 6 May 2010 14:03 (fifteen years ago)
Haha, that is a terrible name. I shall keep my fingers crossed, though I suspect Greens are a real outside chance in that constituency. Still hoping we can get them in here, though.
― emil.y, Thursday, 6 May 2010 14:09 (fifteen years ago)
Hah I have a song by Ronnie Slicker & the Banditz on the Where The Hell Is Leicester comp. And I didn't notice the pun before either!
― a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Thursday, 6 May 2010 14:19 (fifteen years ago)
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2010/5/6/1273151603313/sitonfence.jpg
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 6 May 2010 14:24 (fifteen years ago)
Did you vote?
― sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 14:34 (fifteen years ago)
I did, labour weeks ago.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:09 (fifteen years ago)
how exit polls work: http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2689
There is just the one exit poll these days at British elections. MORI and NOP used to do seperate ones, now they carry it out jointly on behalf of BBC and ITN (and for the first time at this election, Sky), so all three channels will have the same one.It is carried out at around 130 polling stations, and they conduct about 16,500 interviews. They try and use the same polling stations at each election (though changes in wards and polling districts sometimes make it impossible) so that direct changes from the previous election can be drawn. 107 polling stations will be the same ones as last time, with an extra 23 new ones, including some new ones in LD-v-Lab seats which were previously underrepresented. Unlike US exit polls there are no questions about why people voted, it’s just who they voted for.Interviewers stop every nth person coming out the polling station, and give them a mock ballot paper to fill in, if someone refuses they are not replaced by another person. Every hour the papers are collected and phoned back to HQ, where they are weighted for differential response rates and crunched by people like John Curtice, Rob Ford, Clive Payne and Steve Fisher (if you were watching the BBC’s campaign show last night, Steve was the chap demolishing the myth of bad weather helping the Tories!). The first result comes out at 10pm on the dot, with a final projection at 11pm or so.The aim of the exit poll is to predict the seat totals, not the share of the vote, and the team will try to work out if there are different shifts in support in different types of seat. The call is based on a probability of each seat going one way or the other, all summed up to make a seat total.In terms of past accuracy, the exit poll last time got the Labour majority exactly right (though they were slightly off with Conservative and Lib Dem seats). Unless something goes terribly wrong, we should have a broad idea of the result a couple of minutes after 10 o’clock.
It is carried out at around 130 polling stations, and they conduct about 16,500 interviews. They try and use the same polling stations at each election (though changes in wards and polling districts sometimes make it impossible) so that direct changes from the previous election can be drawn. 107 polling stations will be the same ones as last time, with an extra 23 new ones, including some new ones in LD-v-Lab seats which were previously underrepresented. Unlike US exit polls there are no questions about why people voted, it’s just who they voted for.
Interviewers stop every nth person coming out the polling station, and give them a mock ballot paper to fill in, if someone refuses they are not replaced by another person. Every hour the papers are collected and phoned back to HQ, where they are weighted for differential response rates and crunched by people like John Curtice, Rob Ford, Clive Payne and Steve Fisher (if you were watching the BBC’s campaign show last night, Steve was the chap demolishing the myth of bad weather helping the Tories!). The first result comes out at 10pm on the dot, with a final projection at 11pm or so.
The aim of the exit poll is to predict the seat totals, not the share of the vote, and the team will try to work out if there are different shifts in support in different types of seat. The call is based on a probability of each seat going one way or the other, all summed up to make a seat total.
In terms of past accuracy, the exit poll last time got the Labour majority exactly right (though they were slightly off with Conservative and Lib Dem seats). Unless something goes terribly wrong, we should have a broad idea of the result a couple of minutes after 10 o’clock.
― caek, Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:11 (fifteen years ago)
Was wondering where you were registered because one possibility allows a vote for Dave Rowntree. xposy
― sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)
Well that's no fun xp
― Ismael Klata, Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)
http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/5374/camerontext.jpg
― James Mitchell, Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:18 (fifteen years ago)
Still registered in EC1 so vote is for share of the vote rather that change/preventing it. Would have been that way in W1 too.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:19 (fifteen years ago)
Yeahhh, I think Dobson will stay where he is.
― sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)
Has anyone here been exit polled (today or ever)? Just wondering how big n in "every nth person" is.
― xylyl syzygy (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)
There was a woman with a big bumper tory ribbon on outside that I didn't want to talk to. Like jeez, if you want to do fair polling or talk to me about who i voted, at least hide your giant fucking tory ribbon.
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)
Has anyone been refering to a potential split in the LDs. Presumably, in the event of a hung parliament, there are going to be disgruntled members whichever side they choose to support.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)
True
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)
Oh yes.
Very few people seem to be remarking on what a very poor position Cameron will be in though, even if he wins outright. Tax rises will be inevitable, many of his MPs will revolt, it will all get very fractious, and the new "moderate" image he has spent so long cultivating - and which, rightly I think, is considered the reason the Tories are finally electable now - will be rejected as not up to the job, and the old loony ideological fuckshittery will return.
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)
There was a woman with a big bumper tory ribbon on outside that I didn't want to talk to. Like jeez, if you want to do fair polling or talk to me about who i voted, at least hide your giant fucking tory ribbon.― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, May 6, 2010 4:27 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, May 6, 2010 4:27 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
they are tellers. they share their data with the other parties. you can talk to them.
― caek, Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)
pretty sure they are legally obliged to wear the ribbon
― caek, Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)
There were three old ladies in red, yellow and blue rosettes having what looked like a pretty enjoyable gossip with one another at my polling station this morning. Didn't get much of a sense of deep ideological rivalry there.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)
ok, the ribbon thing is not a requirement, but they are not evil people:
http://www.howtowinelections.co.uk/numbertellers.shtmlhttp://www.tameside.gov.uk/elections/tellers
― caek, Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)
tracer - yeah but bear in mind there's the largest influx of new mps maybe ever (subs check this), and they may well see their position in parliament as dependent on cameronism/have been handpicked by his cronies, so he may not find that they're all that difficult to square. tory supporters in the electorate will probably feel differently but as labour voters found, you're invisible unless you're in a marginal constituency.
― joe, Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)
xp to self, i think the point is to get an idea of turnout more than anything, and good luck finding truly independent people to take the day off for an election
― caek, Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)
http://ask.metafilter.com/152726/Tell-us-what-UK-polling-workers-do
Telling is sitting outside a polling station, asking people for their polling number when they come out having voted. It's not an exit poll, so you don't ask how they voted, you just want their polling number, or name and address to know that they have voted.The aim of doing this is to allow that voter to be crossed off the list of potential voters by your party so that they aren't pestered by people later in the day asking them to go to vote, hence focusing resources on those still to vote. It also gives an indication, when coupled with canvassing information on individual voter intention as to how the election is going and where resources need to be moved across a constituency.There's usually a teller for each of the main parties, and it's common to wear a coloured rosette (although you can't have one saying vote for X, or indeed lobby people at all as to how to vote). When I've done it its always been fairly relaxed, with each parties tellers giving each other numbers they've missed etc, although that's not universally the case... It's much more fun on a nice day than when its raining...
The aim of doing this is to allow that voter to be crossed off the list of potential voters by your party so that they aren't pestered by people later in the day asking them to go to vote, hence focusing resources on those still to vote. It also gives an indication, when coupled with canvassing information on individual voter intention as to how the election is going and where resources need to be moved across a constituency.
There's usually a teller for each of the main parties, and it's common to wear a coloured rosette (although you can't have one saying vote for X, or indeed lobby people at all as to how to vote). When I've done it its always been fairly relaxed, with each parties tellers giving each other numbers they've missed etc, although that's not universally the case... It's much more fun on a nice day than when its raining...
― caek, Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)
they are tellers. they share their data with the other parties. you can talk to them
Yes, one solitary young guy with Labour rosette outside my polling station, 'spose the other parties think not much point bothering in ILX Corbynland
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)
i'm sure they aren't but fuck a tory
― tart w/ a heart (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)
I've done this in the past. Reason we did it was to find out which of our potential voters had bothered to vote. Saved us knocking on doors later unnecessarily.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)
Used to get loads of mild abuse - and much huffing and puffing about secret ballots - but we never asked anyone how they voted.
― Ned Trifle II, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)
I've always wanted to be asked how I voted!
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)
How did you vote?
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:24 (fifteen years ago)
I'm from Corbynland, 'nuff said?
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)
Looking forward to watching this 5 hours behind and going to bed at a reasonable hour.
This was last time, probably will be david dimbleby with a cardboard box with a cutout window on it this time to show the new austerity BBC.
http://www.inplas.co.uk/sitegraphics/tv/bbcelection1.jpg
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
ha, you haven't seen the set, then? It's ginormous; biggest video screen in the UK. All of studio 1, if that means anything to you.
― stet, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)
Beeb may as well go out with a bang, the Tories are out to decimate them as soon they can
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)
studio 1 definitely rings a bell.
Could be last big Hurrah for TVC before the BBC flog it.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
There were three old ladies in red, yellow and blue rosettes having what looked like a pretty enjoyable gossip with one another at my polling station this morning. Didn't get much of a sense of deep ideological rivalry there.― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:35 (50 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
― Matt DC, Thursday, 6 May 2010 15:35 (50 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Yeah, after all the fighting, class war, etc, it always amazed me that the most jolly, civilised chat between paries happened right there.
― Mark G, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
If people have't seen this yet, have a quick look at the LIGHTWEIGHT: http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2008/12/cameron-obama-europe-president
― sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
Apparently the BNP is fighting as much internally as externally. BNP webmaster throwing his toys out of the pram and shutting down all official BNP new media tools:
The BNP chaos continues, with its website down for the second time in two days.Yesterday, the BNP webmaster, Simon Bennett, took it down and posted a message accusing Griffin and James Dowson, the BNP election fundraiser, of being "pathetic, desperate and incompetent".Today, he is denying responsibility, saying the matter is now "out of his hands". But he still has time for a dig at Griffin, who he says has "put a personal grudge against me before the interests of the party and its members".Apparently, all the BNP's social media sites and online communications tools are down, too.
Yesterday, the BNP webmaster, Simon Bennett, took it down and posted a message accusing Griffin and James Dowson, the BNP election fundraiser, of being "pathetic, desperate and incompetent".
Today, he is denying responsibility, saying the matter is now "out of his hands". But he still has time for a dig at Griffin, who he says has "put a personal grudge against me before the interests of the party and its members".
Apparently, all the BNP's social media sites and online communications tools are down, too.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
BNP: new media tools
― he speak the frenche as the Frenches himselves (snoball), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
(pretty good description of them in general)
― he speak the frenche as the Frenches himselves (snoball), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)
Jeremy Vine's 2 story 3d virtual reality green screen could be entertaining, especially if he falls down the virtual reality stairs.
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:47 (fifteen years ago)
Are we going to start a new thread at 9:55?
You mean a WE'RE DOOMED! DOOMED, AH TELL YE! thread?
― Am I Re-elected Yet? (Tom D.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:55 (fifteen years ago)
i fucking hate how the tories have bought out (with ashcroft's money too) part of the youtube frontpage. gross.
― nevermind312, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)
Vine can't top the Cowboy thing from last time, I was hoping he'd dress up as Churchill.
The dog, I mean.
― NAGLuck, UK (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)
Have to say that I have almost never seen the youtube home page - I don't think that's how most people use it.
― sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)
bnp webmaster should have asked for buffy dvds
― rahni, Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:10 (fifteen years ago)
I've got adblock running, I assume that's hiding whatever the Tories put on youtube.
― mierda defensa ... no impedir ... espectador (onimo), Thursday, 6 May 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)
The BNP thing is apparently because Griffin and whoever his second-in-command is there these days (still the shirtless guy?) wanted the webmaster guy to take the fall for that Marmite thing.
― Meowsy McDermott, Thursday, 6 May 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)
Not looking good: http://twitter.com/ICMResearch/status/13504226679
― carson dial, Thursday, 6 May 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)
there was a story about an assassination attempt within the b n p recently so 'internal fighting' is putting it mildly.
― koogs, Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)
It's very close, apparently*.
*Source: Twitter phenomenon Tracey Thorn.
― djh, Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4001/4584961904_a740d6eac2.jpg
outside the barking count
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)
She's not sold any records under a Labour government though, surely she'd be excited for the blue revival?
― Meowsy McDermott, Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)
I never thought I'd be watching Derek Hatton on Election Come Dine With Me.
― sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)
especially one who looks barely over 30....
Had to switch it off, painful stuff
― problem chimp (Porkpie), Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)
liddle is such a graceless, subnormal dipsomaniaccurry is just clearly vile, like something very nasty in her has soured and curdled anything vaguely nice - like an unpleasant auntie who makes every family event a trialhatton's re-fighting some old wars at the dinner table, hope he gives the above two the apocalyptic scallop shitsbrian paddick looks like he'll being giving his agent an angry phonecall afterwards
― went ham in a bad way (stevie), Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:36 (fifteen years ago)
also hatton clearly one sorbet off a breakdown
As a result of awaiting election coverage, this is the first time I've watched Outnumbered. That's not too good.
― Meowsy McDermott, Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)
kinda anxious about the exit polls in 10 minutes.
― nevermind312, Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)
stoked for the madness!
― caek, Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:54 (fifteen years ago)
Time for a results thread?
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:55 (fifteen years ago)
New Thread Time?
― American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:55 (fifteen years ago)
Love the superman theme on BBC
― not_goodwin, Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)
Cyanide capsules at the ready you guys.
― Vision Creation Mansun (NickB), Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)
I'll make a new thread then...
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)
Hurry up before i have to riot like a greek!
― not_goodwin, Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:58 (fifteen years ago)
Uk General Election 2010: The Results Thread
― Home Taping Is Killing Muzak (Nasty, Brutish & Short), Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:58 (fifteen years ago)