US POLITICS: Congratulation to USA for their upcoming health

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

And there were some good ones today.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 22 March 2010 02:51 (fifteen years ago)

permission to revise and extend my remarks…booyah!

naus, Monday, 22 March 2010 02:51 (fifteen years ago)

BarackObama Yes we can.
2 minutes ago via web

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:52 (fifteen years ago)

"a few brave democrats!"

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 02:52 (fifteen years ago)

with all due respect, i had the floor!

I now yield.

naus, Monday, 22 March 2010 02:53 (fifteen years ago)

Whoaaa it's getting like the House of Commons in there.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:53 (fifteen years ago)

hate this thread title tbh :(

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:53 (fifteen years ago)

*aborts all the babies*

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:54 (fifteen years ago)

please contact your reps and senators to file a complaint
xpost

tehresa, Monday, 22 March 2010 02:54 (fifteen years ago)

Who is this pillock asking us to think of the unborn?

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:54 (fifteen years ago)

**BREAKING**

Results 1 - 10 of about 226,000 for "scott brown dead". (0.45 seconds)

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:54 (fifteen years ago)

politics now officially as brainless as tweeting

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:54 (fifteen years ago)

Dr_Morbius How do I upload a blog to Twitter? 3 mins ago from web

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:55 (fifteen years ago)

C'mon, Morbs -- there's a talent in reciting blatant untruths and looking like a billy goat while doing so.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:55 (fifteen years ago)

hahahaahahahahahaa jordan

k3vin k., Monday, 22 March 2010 02:55 (fifteen years ago)

216 [Kathryn Jean Lopez]

Congratulations, Democrats. Beginning now, you own the health-care system in America. Every hiccup. Every complaint. Every long line. All yours.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:55 (fifteen years ago)

i'm so sick of the "polls show the american people hate this bill" meme. when GWB was president, republicans strutted around, crowing that he "followed his gut, not some poll" now polls are all-powerful, all-knowing.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 02:56 (fifteen years ago)

hate this thread title tbh :(

Sorry. :-/ It seemed like the only one people were agreeing on. (So I deemed and passed it, thus thwarting the Constitution.)

Ned Raggett, Monday, 22 March 2010 02:56 (fifteen years ago)

I would like to make sure that the phrase 'womb goon' makes it to this thread and into general currency

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:57 (fifteen years ago)

ned as long as you're basically being the next stalin could you lock the other thread?

k3vin k., Monday, 22 March 2010 02:57 (fifteen years ago)

Why are you so gloomy about this, Morbs?

Cunga, Monday, 22 March 2010 02:57 (fifteen years ago)

can someone change the lock of the scott brown thread to This thread has been aborted by an administrator

thanks

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:57 (fifteen years ago)

Where are our wonderful moderators to change this silly title?

¡WOMB GOON! Anyway at least on this occasion I am sensing in-House eyeball roll whenever one of the uterus-free starts going on about not spending a cent on something he's opposed to morally. Like my taxes never do that.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:58 (fifteen years ago)

216 [Kathryn Jean Lopez]

Congratulations, Democrats. Beginning now, you own the health-care system in America. Every hiccup. Every complaint. Every long line. All yours.

as part of our new regime we insist that you put down that fettuccine alfredo.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:58 (fifteen years ago)

you can revise and extend the thread title, if you want

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:58 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: Is Your Washroom Breeding Womb-Goons???

Religious Embolism (WmC), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:59 (fifteen years ago)

"I'm sorry, Ms. Jean Lopez, but the seven Chicken Parmesan Subs lodged in your small intestines actually do count as a preexisting condition. I'm so sorry."

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 02:59 (fifteen years ago)

oh f u bart

k3vin k., Monday, 22 March 2010 02:59 (fifteen years ago)

Where are our wonderful moderators to change this silly title?

I am a wonderful moderator! (Maybe.) Now everyone agree with an alternate title so I can change it.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:00 (fifteen years ago)

I misread the title as US POLITICS: YOUR TWITS ONSCREEN. As I watched the womb-goons it made perfect sense.

EZ Snappin, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:00 (fifteen years ago)

XD

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:00 (fifteen years ago)

what are they shouting?

ksh, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:00 (fifteen years ago)

YOUR TWITS ONSCREEN <-------yes please

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:01 (fifteen years ago)

is bart stupak's hair covered under the new bill?

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:02 (fifteen years ago)

There's a dead baby under it.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:02 (fifteen years ago)

"baby murderer"

Actually quite pleased with Stupak pushback here.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:02 (fifteen years ago)

Why are you so gloomy about this, Morbs?

cuz I don't own an insurance company?

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:02 (fifteen years ago)

the bill is grabage

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:03 (fifteen years ago)

read this morbs

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/12/five_cost_controls_in_the_sena.html

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:03 (fifteen years ago)

lol this is like summer camp with the shouting

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:03 (fifteen years ago)

what are they shouting?

"gangsta, gangsta," that's what they're yelling

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:03 (fifteen years ago)

speaking of bad House hairdos: if only Jimmy Trafficant were still in the House.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:03 (fifteen years ago)

is bart stupak's hair covered under the new bill?

pre-existing conditioner

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:03 (fifteen years ago)

Where are our wonderful moderators to change this silly title?

CNN gave us this title.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:03 (fifteen years ago)

hahahaha, J0hn

ksh, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:03 (fifteen years ago)

NOT TWITS. JESUS YOU GUYS. IT'S A U.S. POLITICS THREAD. WE DO NOT REALLY SAY "TWIT" OVER HERE UNLESS WE HAVE BEEN WATCHING TOO MUCH PBS.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:03 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.truecrimereport.com/Jim%20Traficant.jpg

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:04 (fifteen years ago)

i nominate "your screens on tweek" but can't imagine I'll get a quorum on that one

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:04 (fifteen years ago)

Ed, I know that's where the title is from, I just think it needs a slight remix.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:04 (fifteen years ago)

JOHN D MY MOTHER IN LAW SAYS TWIT TO DESCRIBE CERTAIN PEOPLE AND SHE IS NOT BRITISH YOU GOT A PROBLEM WITH HER YOU GOT A PROBLEM WITH ME BUDDY

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:04 (fifteen years ago)

Yes We Traficant

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:04 (fifteen years ago)

@ J0hn D

FLIP YOU MELLON FARMER

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:05 (fifteen years ago)

viewers' calls on C-SPAN, awesome!

ksh, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:05 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: TWEETS TO THE LEFT OF ME, WOMB-GOONS TO THE RIGHT

Religious Embolism (WmC), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:05 (fifteen years ago)

HEAD CARNEGIE IN CHARGE

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:06 (fifteen years ago)

there needs to be anonymous therapy groups for people who call into cspan

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:06 (fifteen years ago)

FWIW, i can't really take credit for "womb goon." at best i can only popularize the term.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:06 (fifteen years ago)

JOHN D MY MOTHER IN LAW SAYS TWIT TO DESCRIBE CERTAIN PEOPLE AND SHE IS NOT BRITISH YOU GOT A PROBLEM WITH HER YOU GOT A PROBLEM WITH ME BUDDY

ADMIT THAT SHE IS A PBS DONOR

FOOLING NO-ONE QUE

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:06 (fifteen years ago)

I like WmC's.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:06 (fifteen years ago)

"alright, we got your point"

ksh, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:06 (fifteen years ago)

there needs to be anonymous therapy groups for people who call into cspan

lol, yeah. it's a highbrow crowd.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 03:07 (fifteen years ago)

U.S. POLITICS THREAD: THE FIRST 400 POSTS ARE MAINLY TRYING TO NAME THE THREAD

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:07 (fifteen years ago)

cnn reporting someone from the gop side on the floor yelled "baby killer" at stupak when he was finishing up his speech. they're trying to figure out who it is now.

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:07 (fifteen years ago)

'Womb goon': it's lovely and onomatopoeic like 'God botherer'.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:08 (fifteen years ago)

I DOUBT SHE IS A PBS DONOR BUT SHE LOVES MASTERPIECE THEATRE

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:08 (fifteen years ago)

"they're good parents, they don't want me to die"

ksh, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:08 (fifteen years ago)

some of these C-Span callers make the pro-life grandstanders seem like the Oxford Debate Team.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:08 (fifteen years ago)

i'm kind of lol'ing at the fact that it's named YOUR TWEETS ONSCREEN in the first place because i didn't think my suggestion was all that funny

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:08 (fifteen years ago)

*alert*

michael steele has called into fox news

*alert*

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:09 (fifteen years ago)

womb goon follies

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:09 (fifteen years ago)

guys

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:09 (fifteen years ago)

I DOUBT SHE IS A PBS DONOR BUT SHE LOVES MASTERPIECE THEATRE

QUE E.D.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:09 (fifteen years ago)

geraldo rivera is modding a debate between al sharpton and michael steele on fox news

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:09 (fifteen years ago)

A+

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:10 (fifteen years ago)

geraldo rivera is modding a debate between al sharpton and michael steele on fox news

I want this to be a regular show ASAP.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:10 (fifteen years ago)

with guest dancing by Bill 'Cliff Huxtable' Cosby.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:10 (fifteen years ago)

looking forward to the forthcoming bizzaro lawsuits challenging this bill.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 03:10 (fifteen years ago)

all the people who call into cspan sound like voices on family guy

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:10 (fifteen years ago)

should i prank call cspan? and if so, what should i say

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:11 (fifteen years ago)

ask them what we should call the thread

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:11 (fifteen years ago)

"when we can and cannot sleep"

WTF

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:12 (fifteen years ago)

lol, yeah. ask if jose canceco's mental condition will be covered by obamacare.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 03:12 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:12 (fifteen years ago)

i'm not insured, i'm healthy and 20 ...

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:12 (fifteen years ago)

ask them if "Obama" is "Lenin" spelled backwards

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:12 (fifteen years ago)

poor C-SPAN dude looks like he just wants to go home

ksh, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:13 (fifteen years ago)

Rochester MN woman bringing it for the Mayo.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:13 (fifteen years ago)

okay, i'm calling in, saying my name is Burt Stanton

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:13 (fifteen years ago)

i'm going to say that if i wanted this health care, i would've taken the hot tub time machine back to stalinist russia

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:14 (fifteen years ago)

godspeed

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:14 (fifteen years ago)

mention ILX

ksh, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:14 (fifteen years ago)

actually, don't

ksh, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:15 (fifteen years ago)

how can you still be undecided?

ksh, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:15 (fifteen years ago)

Teenager innit.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:15 (fifteen years ago)

let's have a moment of the silence for the grandmas being unplugged tonight all across america.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:15 (fifteen years ago)

because you want to know why now?

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:15 (fifteen years ago)

Taibbi:

I hate this bill and have since the beginning — to me it seems like a radical and dangerous step to start forcing people to become customers of a seriously overpriced, inefficient product, thereby removing the last incentive for an already antitrust-exempted, horrifically-performing industry to improve itself in any way.

But I’m beginning to come around to the idea that if we do pass this thing, sooner or later Congress is going to get around to complaining about subsidizing the profits of WellPoint and Aetna and all the rest of them. Naturally the first place they’ll cut in future budget crises is the “affordability credits” for low-income earners, but there’s a slim chance they’ll get around to chiseling the fat from the insurance companies, too, which might in turn lead ultimately to a sane revamping of this ridiculous system.

Or maybe not. I’m trying to find a way to feel good about this thing. Is there a way this thing doesn’t suck?

http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2010/03/16/reconciling-reconciliation/

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:16 (fifteen years ago)

nitwit teenager.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 03:16 (fifteen years ago)

"i will not vote for a Democrat again."

why do i think that people saying that would never voted for a Democrat long before today's vote? and why do wingnuts think that people are dumb enough to fall for this ... actually, forget that last part.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:16 (fifteen years ago)

i can't get in u_u

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:17 (fifteen years ago)

too many nitwit teenagers calling-in

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 03:17 (fifteen years ago)

Someone should point out to Taibbi that the new health care laws cover being doused with coffee by angry dudes.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:18 (fifteen years ago)

too much amateur philosophizing. a lot of it from teenagers.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:18 (fifteen years ago)

According to my info screen, this stuff I'm watching on MSNBC right now is called "The Stripper and the Steelworker." I guess that refers to Boehner and Pelosi?

Religious Embolism (WmC), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:18 (fifteen years ago)

Someone should point out to Taibbi that the new health care laws cover being doused with coffee by angry dudes.

this will make Michael Moore happy.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:19 (fifteen years ago)

there was an incident with bart stupak

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:21 (fifteen years ago)

huh?

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 03:21 (fifteen years ago)

LUKE RUSSERT IS ON THE STORY

did he say "well, dude, i was on the floor" -- that's what i want to hear at least

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:21 (fifteen years ago)

someone yelled "baby killer" at bart stupak and his hair

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:21 (fifteen years ago)

and plenty of my right-wing FB friends are sorely tempting my "defriend" button right about now.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:21 (fifteen years ago)

heckler has not been identified

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:22 (fifteen years ago)

stupak's hair was seen weeping

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:22 (fifteen years ago)

WTF SEAN HANNITY JUST PUNCHED SOMEBODY

Cunga, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:22 (fifteen years ago)

gtf outta here

k3vin k., Monday, 22 March 2010 03:23 (fifteen years ago)

the health care debate with morbs:

M: This health care bill is garbage.

ilxor: but doesn't it do more good than harm?

M: Go watch a kevin smith movie, cocksucker.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:23 (fifteen years ago)

"it sounded like he had a southern accent"

Religious Embolism (WmC), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:23 (fifteen years ago)

sean hannity just punched bart stupak's hair

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:23 (fifteen years ago)

bart stupak's hair's chief of staff has wrestled hannity down to the ground

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:24 (fifteen years ago)

http://rimworlds.com/theclassicsciencefictionchannel/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/eraserhead.jpg

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:24 (fifteen years ago)

YOUR TWEENS ON SKREEEEEET

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:24 (fifteen years ago)

re: taibbi - well, one perspective on it from one of the few progressive blogosphere people who know what they're talking about as far as the process goes.. this piece of legislation is passing parts of health care reform that are toughest to get through, the mandate, regulation, subsidies. this is the hard part. but after this it should not be so hard (in theory) to pass other bills for the public option or opening medicare to more people, because the issue at hand will be about saving money, there won't be all this other stuff to deal with now that reform's been passed.

no disrespect but taibbi's not an expert here

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:25 (fifteen years ago)

YOUR TWEETS ON SPEED

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:25 (fifteen years ago)

WHITE PUNKS ON TWEET

Religious Embolism (WmC), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:26 (fifteen years ago)

taibbi seems off-base to me, here, and i love his writing/analysis.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 03:26 (fifteen years ago)

mainly I'm trying to sponsor an amendment to get the word "tweet" the f. outta the thread title

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:26 (fifteen years ago)

so, when do i get all of yr checks? or will the government just show up @ my door with big piles of other ppl's health-money?

sleepingbag, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:28 (fifteen years ago)

I'm hoping I get pizza.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:28 (fifteen years ago)

J0hn, you have my vote.

GOP GONE WILD: YOUR TITS ONSCREEN

EZ Snappin, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:29 (fifteen years ago)

i think it's time to turn off msnbc when i start finding myself getting attracted to ezra klein

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:29 (fifteen years ago)

Welcome to Repeal It!: the pledge to rescue America from Twitter-referencing thread titles. We know it’s not enough just to fight this thread title – it could still pass. So our pledge is to Repeal It!

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:30 (fifteen years ago)

tbh, defriending quite a few on FB right now.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:30 (fifteen years ago)

i think it's time to turn off msnbc when i start finding myself getting attracted to ezra klein

you're the only one.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:30 (fifteen years ago)

haha NOT the only one, rather

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:30 (fifteen years ago)

I've been watching CNN's live coverage, NO commmentators.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:31 (fifteen years ago)

matthew yglesias:

Now that it’s done, Barack Obama will go down in history as one of America’s finest presidents. It’s always possible of course that, like LBJ, he’ll get involved in some unrelated fiasco that mars his reputation. But fundamentally, he’s reshaped the policy landscape in a way that no progressive politician has done in decades.

Under the circumstances, it’s in some ways crazy to realize the scope of things still on the congress’ plate. The House has already passed major legislation dealing with climate change and financial regulation, and the president is also committed to significant reform of K-12 education and the immigration system.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 03:31 (fifteen years ago)

on the baby killer thing, from tpm;

After speaking with reporters he went back into the House chamber and then returned a few moments later and said: "Other people agree with me it was someone with a southern accent." Campbell also said that some of the Republicans on the floor recognized the voice but would not say who it was.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:32 (fifteen years ago)

Eh, let's not suck each other's dicks yet.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:32 (fifteen years ago)

quit standing between the ppl & their beejes Alfred

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:34 (fifteen years ago)

Now that it’s done, Barack Obama will go down in history as one of America’s finest presidents.

also, may I be the first to say "lol"

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:34 (fifteen years ago)

BJ's aren't covered in this bill, J0hn.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:35 (fifteen years ago)

but doesn't it do more good than harm?

We'll know in about ten years, right? I have strong doubts. If it turns out to stink, Matt A will blame it on Nader.

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:36 (fifteen years ago)

I am writing the extra check every month for the beej & I advise all my constituents to do the same

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:36 (fifteen years ago)

BarackObama

About to address the nation on tonight's historic vote. Watch live: http://j.mp/dvUmn2
half a minute ago via web

ice cr?m, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:37 (fifteen years ago)

oh man Nancy and her gavel, be still my heart

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:37 (fifteen years ago)

pelosi's glass-eyed smile face is so, so creepy

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:37 (fifteen years ago)

this healthcare bill is exactly like a movie morbs hasnt seen but h8 fiercely none the less

ice cr?m, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:37 (fifteen years ago)

man i hate ed schulz

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:38 (fifteen years ago)

this healthcare bill is exactly like a movie morbs hasnt seen but h8 fiercely none the less

to be fair most of those movies don't bend over backwards to demonize abortion & the women who need them

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:39 (fifteen years ago)

healthcare bill has quentin tarantino earmarks

iatee, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:39 (fifteen years ago)

sooo happy I don't have cable. Is David Gergen somewhere?

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:39 (fifteen years ago)

u clearly havent seen knocked up john

ice cr?m, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:40 (fifteen years ago)

Is David Gergen somewhere?

this is blowing my mynd right now.

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:41 (fifteen years ago)

well you've got me dead to rights there cr?am

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:41 (fifteen years ago)

david gergen is EVERYWHERE

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:41 (fifteen years ago)

H: why, specifically, are you opposed to this bill?

C: this bill is an egregious, egregious . . .

(long pause)

. . . sorry, this bill is just horrible.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 03:41 (fifteen years ago)

who?

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:42 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlDC/original/img-david-gergen-_142308819606.jpg

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:42 (fifteen years ago)

http://cagle.msnbc.com/hogan/webextras15/TTV/SavoirFaire.jpg

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:42 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: A HANDSOME BAKED POTATO

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:42 (fifteen years ago)

dana bash reports that "this took so long because the package needed to be gone over with a fine toothed comb" -- well then

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:42 (fifteen years ago)

http://sanford.duke.edu/news/newsletters/dpn/images/spring99/Gergen.jpg

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:43 (fifteen years ago)

big hairy packages

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:43 (fifteen years ago)

this healthcare bill is exactly like a movie morbs hasnt seen but h8 fiercely none the less

The QT amendment does state any new prosthetic limb will be automatic.

EZ Snappin, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:43 (fifteen years ago)

with very few exceptions, just about all of these folks calling into C-Span make me weep for this country.

also, i SERIOUSLY doubt that this Oklahoma woman complaining about foreign health care systems REALLY ever lived abroad.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:44 (fifteen years ago)

so gross gergens minimalist combover consisting of like 100 hairs

ice cr?m, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:44 (fifteen years ago)

fortunately the house just passed universal combover consultations.

obama wants american men to not look like douches.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:46 (fifteen years ago)

a georgia house member just resigned?

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:46 (fifteen years ago)

on the floor

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:46 (fifteen years ago)

indeed -- GREAT TIMING

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:46 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.whitehouse.gov/live

ksh, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:46 (fifteen years ago)

He's resigning so he can leave the chamber for pizza.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:47 (fifteen years ago)

WTF SEAN HANNITY JUST PUNCHED SOMEBODY

― Cunga, Sunday, March 21, 2010 10:22 PM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark

^^ srsly what the hell was this, details??

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:47 (fifteen years ago)

We'll know in about ten years, right?
― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, March 22, 2010 3:36 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark

people with pre-existing health problems can get health insurance now. Why is this not a victory?

Sure maybe it's not a huge victory, but we're better off with it than without it.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:47 (fifteen years ago)

Peace out, Nathan Deal

naus, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:47 (fifteen years ago)

Biden is crying.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:47 (fifteen years ago)

i'm pretty sure cunga was a-jokin

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:48 (fifteen years ago)

cuz there is nothing on the twitter about it

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:48 (fifteen years ago)

Biden is crying.

― APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, March 22, 2010 3:47 AM (15 seconds ago) Bookmark

awwwww that old softie.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:48 (fifteen years ago)

that guy cries at anything.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 03:49 (fifteen years ago)

he's the dick vermeil of nat'l politics.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 03:49 (fifteen years ago)

"I want to thank my Vice President, Joe Biden, who has now been stoned for a full calendar year."

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:49 (fifteen years ago)

hmmmm *strokes chin quizzically*

House boosts college aid for students in need

By JIM KUHNHENN
Associated Press Writer
updated 4 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - Riding the coattails of a historic health care vote, the House on Sunday also passed a broad reorganization of college aid that affects millions of students and moves President Barack Obama closer to winning yet another of his top domestic policies.

The bill rewrites a four-decades-old student loan program, eliminating its reliance on private lenders and uses the savings to direct $36 billion in new spending to Pell Grants for students in financial need.

In the biggest piece of education legislation since No Child Left Behind nine years ago, the bill would also provide more than $4 billion to historically black colleges and community colleges.

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:49 (fifteen years ago)

Biden is thinking about handsome hot baked potatoes.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:50 (fifteen years ago)

ok damn that college aid bill sounds awesome

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:50 (fifteen years ago)

Biden doesnt cry at Israeli apartheid

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:51 (fifteen years ago)

this healthcare bill is exactly like any movie icey has seen -- NEW, AND THEREFORE GREAT

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:51 (fifteen years ago)

If by Israeli apartheid you mean a shortage of matzoh balls at state dinners, then yes, yes he does

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:52 (fifteen years ago)

^^^ advantage Morbius

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:52 (fifteen years ago)

oh morbzpaws

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:53 (fifteen years ago)

obama's amazing. he's speaking on the TV now, and he just emailed me.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 03:54 (fifteen years ago)

he never stops working

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 03:54 (fifteen years ago)

his speech has been pretty good, of course

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:54 (fifteen years ago)

i prefer pelosi's

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 03:55 (fifteen years ago)

and god bless all the aborted babies

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:55 (fifteen years ago)

I'd just like to remind everybody that the man is Nairf

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:56 (fifteen years ago)

obama and biden trotting off into the sunset patting each others backs was pretty sweet though

we just have to get over it that's science (schlump), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:56 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha guys, geraldo is trolling fox news

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:56 (fifteen years ago)

thanks, guys, it's been real. I'll see you tomorrow in Nixonland.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:56 (fifteen years ago)

he pretty much just asked brett baier "isn't it possible that all the critics at fox news were wrong" -- baier's looked like he had just seen an onscreen murder

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:57 (fifteen years ago)

this healthcare bill is exactly like any movie icey has seen -- NEW, AND THEREFORE GREAT

― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Sunday, March 21, 2010 11:51 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

words from our local conservative progressive (and at least i watched the movie so ptthhhbt)

ice cr?m, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:57 (fifteen years ago)

whoa Geraldo really is off the reservation here.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:58 (fifteen years ago)

can we also note that possibly the shrewdest move of the night was tiger woods giving his first post-text message/sex therapy interview tonight

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:58 (fifteen years ago)

obama's amazing. he's speaking on the TV now, and he just emailed me.

― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, March 21, 2010 11:54 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

he never stops working

― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, March 21, 2010 11:54 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark

he just updated his Facebook page too! he's AMAZING!!

XD

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:59 (fifteen years ago)

u making soooo much sense, joe

Obama is your fave conservative, obviously

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 March 2010 03:59 (fifteen years ago)

Hey morbs, in the trailer for health care reform you saw, did it have the coverage for pre-existing conditions in it? Because that was one of the best parts of the movie.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 22 March 2010 03:59 (fifteen years ago)

seriously sometimes I wonder how you people can be so blind

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSWzzXHvVps

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:00 (fifteen years ago)

The Democrat Party just signed their own death warrant for the mid-term elections.

You’re finished, FINISHED, F-I-N-I-S-H-E-D! This is just like 1994, and this bill is like the Brady Bill.

I can’t wait for the election.
I hate liberals, so much. Fuck you all. You’re cockroaches.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 04:00 (fifteen years ago)

I wish Obama had given brief nods to Kennedy and Clinton--not just for the '93 effort, but supposedly he was enlisted to make phone calls yesterday.

clemenza, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:00 (fifteen years ago)

i would like to see ufc stage a match between bart stupak's hair and geraldo rivera's mustache

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:00 (fifteen years ago)

geraldo's hair is pretty special too.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:01 (fifteen years ago)

most effective first-year for a recent president, in terms of getting signature legislation passed: Bush I; Clinton; Bush II; Obama?

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 04:01 (fifteen years ago)

u making soooo much sense, joe

Obama is your fave conservative, obviously

― Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Sunday, March 21, 2010 11:59 PM (3 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

u just jealous cause i answered the call from history while ur on the sidelines checking caller id

ice cr?m, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:02 (fifteen years ago)

ADJOURNED!

off to the bar.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 04:02 (fifteen years ago)

i saw some of geraldo just now - that was funny. the fox audience mostly hates him i think..

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:02 (fifteen years ago)

HOW COULD NAIRF SEEK WARN MUSLIM

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:02 (fifteen years ago)

c'mon -- EVERYONE hates geraldo

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:03 (fifteen years ago)

PEC ban begins 2014, no?

k3vin k., Monday, 22 March 2010 04:03 (fifteen years ago)

so is "Stripper and the Steelworker" pre-empted to later tonight, or am I just going to have to wonder about it the rest of my life?

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:03 (fifteen years ago)

What is this nairf shite again?

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:03 (fifteen years ago)

hey so did something happen tonight, I was watching opera and playing WoW all day today

btw Ariadne auf Naxos is kind of crazy

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:03 (fifteen years ago)

joe you gotta admit "at least I watched knocked up" is self-damnation with very faint praise

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:04 (fifteen years ago)

Morbz just watched a bad Israeli movie, that's all.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:05 (fifteen years ago)

Kennedy made phone calls yesterday? Damn, the plan is working already.

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:05 (fifteen years ago)

he called me and told me to bet on wake forest

still pissed about it tbh

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:06 (fifteen years ago)

dr. m, aside from the abortion issue, what exactly do you dislike about this bill?

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 04:06 (fifteen years ago)

I knew I should have reworded that...

clemenza, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:07 (fifteen years ago)

OHHHH, i see kansas lost. EXCITING.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 04:07 (fifteen years ago)

some choice pelosi giggles there

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:07 (fifteen years ago)

hey knocked up was kinda funny! it had a scene where they ate shrooms in vegas and talked abt chairs, it was a decent bill

ice cr?m, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:07 (fifteen years ago)

icey, in what ways am I conservative? Just anybody who knows Bam is a tool gets the C-word, eh?

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:07 (fifteen years ago)

again i say: oddly hot with the giggles.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 04:07 (fifteen years ago)

I. LOVE. THIS. GUY'S. ORATION. STYLE.

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:10 (fifteen years ago)

conservative, distrusts change.

ice cr?m, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:11 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha CHANGE

I self-identify as a radical fairy w/out the hummus or Wicca.

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:11 (fifteen years ago)

do you shower

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:12 (fifteen years ago)

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:BLRcNdEZP3a37M:http://www.hotflick.net/flicks/1993_The_Firm/993TFM_Wilford_Brimley_004.jpg
I self-identify as a radical fairy w/out the hummus or Wicca.

ice cr?m, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:13 (fifteen years ago)

henry waxman is SHORT

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 04:17 (fifteen years ago)

ah right...ilx

balls, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:17 (fifteen years ago)

morbs, this bill may not bitchslap corporations as much as you (or I) would like, but it covers people with pre-existing conditions and helps Medicare cut costs and therefore survive.

This is an important and necessary thing. You have a lot of legit criticisms of Obama, but waiting 20 years to get a better health care bill was not an option.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:18 (fifteen years ago)

WTF SEAN HANNITY JUST PUNCHED SOMEBODY

― Cunga, Sunday, March 21, 2010 10:22 PM (24 minutes ago) Bookmark

^^ srsly what the hell was this, details??

Someone burst into the room saying that, and we were all pretty convinced, got up out of our chairs etc. Also a nomination for new thread title if we still need one.

Cunga, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:21 (fifteen years ago)

there could be more progressive bills, obv. (e.g., with public-option). but this is a major step forward. i don't think it's an exaggeration to say it is comparable to the passage of the medicare program.

(xp)

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 04:22 (fifteen years ago)

the bill's ok in some ways & stupid in others but the idea that opposing it is "conservative" is really beneath you joe - if I fuck your shit up & you oppose it, are you being conservative by opposing the change I bring? c'mon man you're better than that

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:22 (fifteen years ago)

and don't come with any "yeah I wd be conservative abt that," you know v. well you're using the term as an insult. it is not "conservative" to not think much of this bill, though many conservatives oppose it.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:22 (fifteen years ago)

I like this:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse/4453307340/

Because you can see Gibbs in the background thinking "Man, tomorrow will be EASY."

Ned Raggett, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:23 (fifteen years ago)

j0hn you do realize that he's never being serious right? ok

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:23 (fifteen years ago)

I want to see the movie where Morbz wakes up a Republican.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:23 (fifteen years ago)

lol sexism on nbc: pelosi didn't "hit a home run" or "hit it out of the park" -- she "landed a quadruple lutz"

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:24 (fifteen years ago)

j0hn you do realize that he's never being serious right? ok

no I always get that one wrong :( ppl who are never being serious are my kryptonite

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:24 (fifteen years ago)

i was jus 'fuckin w/morbs' jeez

ice cr?m, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:25 (fifteen years ago)

omg dr. m, are you a republican?

i wouldn't have guessed that, really

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 04:25 (fifteen years ago)

lol

k3vin k., Monday, 22 March 2010 04:28 (fifteen years ago)

http://aka-cdn-ns.adtechus.com/images/508/Ad714236St1Sz170Sq1173576V1Id1.jpg

intersex retard (velko), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:28 (fifteen years ago)

i do srsly think its not a stretch to describe the good doctor as dispositionally (tho obvs not politically) conservative - i mean he h8s cell phones ffs - i cannot imagine the horrible things he must say abt indoor plumbing and twitter

ice cr?m, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:29 (fifteen years ago)

Here are the effective 
dates of major provisions of the health care overhaul legislation:

WITHIN A YEAR:

Provides a $250 rebate to Medicare prescription drug beneficiaries whose initial benefits run out.

90 DAYS AFTER ENACTMENT:

Provides immediate 
access to high-risk pools for people with no insurance because of pre-existing 
conditions.

SIX MONTHS AFTER 
ENACTMENT:

Bars insurers from denying people coverage when they get sick.

Bars insurers from 
denying coverage to children with pre-existing conditions.

Bars insurers from 
imposing lifetime caps on coverage.

Requires insurers to 
allow people to stay on their parents' policies until they turn 26.

IN 2011:

Requires individual and small group market plans to spend 80 percent of premium dollars on medical services. Large group plans have to spend at least 85 percent.

IN 2013:

Increases the Medicare payroll tax and expands it to dividend, interest and other unearned income for singles earning more than $200,000 and joint filers making more than $250,000.

IN 2014:

Provides subsidies for families earning up to 400 percent of the poverty level, currently about $88,000 a year, to purchase health insurance.

Requires most employers to provide coverage or face penalties.

Requires most people to obtain coverage or face penalties.

IN 2018:

Imposes a 40 percent 
excise tax on high-end 
insurance policies.

IN 2019:

Expands health insurance coverage to 32 million people.

SOURCES: Speaker of the House, Congressional Budget Office, Kaiser Family Foundation.

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:31 (fifteen years ago)

I'd just like to remind everybody that the man is Nairf

― the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, March 22, 2010 3:56 AM (23 minutes ago) Bookmark

<3!!!

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:31 (fifteen years ago)

doesn't everybody hate cell phones? obv. they bring mad convenience but they have made 99% of the planet look like shitheads

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:31 (fifteen years ago)

^^^^^^^^^^^ They are a necessary evil.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:32 (fifteen years ago)

seriously now: i understand (what i think are) morbz' points (when he isn't just tossing off bitchy one-liners) and the difference b/w Obama's rhetoric and his actions can be infuriating (financial reform is the bee in MY bonnet wr2 the President). but seriously, a lot of laws & regulations that we now consider progressive started off much weaker and compromised than they eventually became -- like Medicare and Social Security; and the 1957(?) civil rights act as weak as it was also served as a template for the much better 1964 Voting Rights and Civil Rights Acts. there's no guarantee that imperfections in this health care bill will be cured, but there's at least the POSSIBILITY that they can be improved -- which would not happen AT ALL if no bill had passed.

and yes, this is a major achievement for Obama. i mean that in a sort of neutral, these-are-the-facts way (the same way that i can say that Reagan's tax cuts in the early 1980s was a major achievement for HIM even if i don't like it).

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:32 (fifteen years ago)

like between an anachronist w/no cell phone and the dudes in airports around whom I spend half my waking life as they yammer loudly away on their hands-frees, reminding me of nothing so much as unmedicated dudes on a 72-hold at county medical, gimme the more "conservative" option plz

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:33 (fifteen years ago)

i love morbs, but i don't see why anyone in this thread seriously engages him like ^^this when he refuses to articulate himself beyond zings (which i enjoy of course)

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:33 (fifteen years ago)

i love morbs, but i don't see why anyone in this thread seriously engages him like ^^this when he refuses to articulate himself beyond zings

J0rdan with love I'm not sure you don't live in a glass house from which it would be imprudent to call ppl out for "refus[ing] to articulate [themselves] beyond zings"

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:35 (fifteen years ago)

^^^ mainly just did that post for bracket practice tho so n/m the content

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:35 (fifteen years ago)

well, we don't always have to write full-length treatises w/ footnotes, citations & shit when we post our opinions.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:36 (fifteen years ago)

yes and rightfully so no one engaged me on my opinions because i was just makin jokes tonight

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:37 (fifteen years ago)

i'm just saying -- as everyone says -- this thread is much more fun when people ignore dr. morbius, or at least treat him like a harmless cat that nips at your elbow

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:38 (fifteen years ago)

hold on let me deconstruct that

ice cr?m, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:38 (fifteen years ago)

wait when the fuck to cats ever nip at yr elbows

ice cr?m, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:38 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i've never owned a cat -- i guess i said that cuz my elbow is hanging off the couch right now

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:39 (fifteen years ago)

wait when the fuck to cats ever nip at yr elbows

new favorite sentence of all time

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:40 (fifteen years ago)

sometimes they attack your feet when you are sleeping

for me to chilt on (bnw), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:41 (fifteen years ago)

when the fuck to cats attack your feet? when you are sleeping.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:41 (fifteen years ago)

btw yall

Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL), wearing a tie with the American flag printed on it

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:42 (fifteen years ago)

Morbs is conservative in as much as all dismissive skepticism is.

"Yes We Can!" obv. not the slogan of choice for a skeptic, or a conservative.

Anyway, back to the zingers...

Cunga, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:43 (fifteen years ago)

Chestnuts roasting on an open fire
Some cats nipping at elbows

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:43 (fifteen years ago)

He does that all the time. Dude has to raise his game re: clothes I think.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:43 (fifteen years ago)

fortunately Obamacare will cover your catscratched elbows

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:44 (fifteen years ago)

anyway i had fun spending this historic night with you all, and im happy this crazy shit finally went through, i cant recall the last time the political apparatus of our country did something this good, on one hand thats not saying much, on the other hand maybe it is, good night!

ice cr?m, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:44 (fifteen years ago)

very happy about this. will be careful to avoid speaking with my republican family members for a week or so.

ryan, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:44 (fifteen years ago)

crazy s--t, this HCR. thanks for the lols, y'all.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 04:45 (fifteen years ago)

very happy about this. will be careful to avoid speaking with my republican family members for a week or so.

― ryan, Monday, March 22, 2010 4:44 AM (4 seconds ago) Bookmark

"WE ARE RUINED. Congratulations ObamaNazi! You have successfully killed the democratic capitalist republic once known as America! Now please go burn in hell. Thank you and have a great day!" -

thread is now about right-wing status updates.

Cunga, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:47 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.bobcesca.com/images/medicare_sign_teabaggers.jpg

goodnight, everybody!

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 04:48 (fifteen years ago)

^^

the "get a brain, morans!" of the tea-bagger set.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:49 (fifteen years ago)

Fixed the title

First and Last and Safeways ™ (jjjusten), Monday, 22 March 2010 04:50 (fifteen years ago)

mr moderator the polls clearly show that the people of ilx do not support such a radical change

k3vin k., Monday, 22 March 2010 04:52 (fifteen years ago)

the democratic capitalist republic once known as America

That sounds more classically 1960s East European satellite republic than anything else! Ask your relatives how their translation of The State and Revolution is coming along.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 22 March 2010 04:54 (fifteen years ago)

I hate cellphones almost as much as I hate John Boehner.

❽ (M.V.), Monday, 22 March 2010 05:11 (fifteen years ago)

People who don't have cell phones and are secretly proud about it are 100x worse than people who have cell phones. I used to be the former and I know. TBF they are not as bad as people who don't have TVs and are secretly proud about it.

Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 22 March 2010 05:19 (fifteen years ago)

I have a cellphone and I hate it.

❽ (M.V.), Monday, 22 March 2010 05:25 (fifteen years ago)

Serious question - is there any reason to believe that this bill is going to let me (28, self-employed) buy a reasonable health insurance plan (ie doctor co-pays from day 1, reasonable deductibles on big procedures) for less than $200/month?

FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT IN THE PARKING LOT! (milo z), Monday, 22 March 2010 05:32 (fifteen years ago)

Senate schedule:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/21/AR2010032103445.html

Ned Raggett, Monday, 22 March 2010 05:35 (fifteen years ago)

current state of foxnews just for posterity

• VIDEOS: Obama Calls Passage a 'Victory' | Boehner to Dems: 'Hell No You Haven't Read It' | Pelosi: 'All-American Act'
• Stupak Called 'Baby Killer' | Groups Slam Obama Order on Abortion | RAW DATA: Executive Order on Abortion Funds
• SPEAKER'S LOBBY: Arrests Inside Capitol Building | READ THE BILL: Share Your Thoughts
• Pinkerton: Obamacare Is the Next Roe v. Wade | Tantaros: Biggest Abuse of Power | Peek: 'Victory' at What Price?

Milton Parker, Monday, 22 March 2010 06:05 (fifteen years ago)

aaand the opinion section

#

* The Biggest Abuse Of Power And Arrogance Washington Has Ever Seen
The "change we can believe in" from President Obama and the Democrats has resulted in a health care bill that ...

#

* The Cost Of Doing Business Has Just Gone Up
* What Price Victory?
* Obamacare Is The Next Roe V. Wade
* What Happens When America Forgets God
* Obama To America -- I Win, You Lose
* We're Headed Straight Off A Cliff If Health Care Passes
* At Long Last, Universal Health Care

Milton Parker, Monday, 22 March 2010 06:07 (fifteen years ago)

* Obama To America -- I Win, You Lose

lawlz

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 22 March 2010 06:11 (fifteen years ago)

I wish I could keep up with these threads.

grady "cougar" mellencamp (The Reverend), Monday, 22 March 2010 06:34 (fifteen years ago)

What Happens When America Forgets God.

I certainly can't think of anything Christlike in the idea that every man woman and child in a wealthy promise land should be healed through charity and pious actions of unselfish brotherly love.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 22 March 2010 07:05 (fifteen years ago)

still unclear - is this now law? does the senate have to do something else?

if not, why the hell did anyone care about Scott brown???

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 09:50 (fifteen years ago)

Me too. Bill still has to pass Senate, but Congress have passed the Senate's Bill so basically done? BBC news seemed equally confused saying Obama will sign it but that Republican's could still do something in Senate?

Ned Trifle II, Monday, 22 March 2010 10:23 (fifteen years ago)

From this it still seems to have a way to go?

The president is expected to sign the House-approved Senate bill as early as Tuesday, after which it will be officially enacted into law. However, the bill will contain some very unpopular measures that Democratic senators have agreed to amend.
The Senate will be able to make the required changes in a separate bill using a procedure known as reconciliation, which allows budget provisions to be approved with 51 votes - rather than the 60 needed to overcome blocking tactics.
The Republicans say they will seek to repeal the measure, challenge its constitutionality and co-ordinate efforts in state legislatures to block its implementation.

Ned Trifle II, Monday, 22 March 2010 10:27 (fifteen years ago)

good explanation of what happens next

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 10:55 (fifteen years ago)

The tea-party folks just decide to gun down anyone this helps?

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 10:57 (fifteen years ago)

You have a lot of legit criticisms of Obama, but waiting 20 years to get a better health care bill was not an option.

Getting a better bill in the PAST YEAR was an option for anyone but these losers.

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 March 2010 11:43 (fifteen years ago)

riiiiiiiiight

Wat ho, goatee'd man? Thy skinnee jenes hath byrn'd my corneyas. (stevie), Monday, 22 March 2010 11:49 (fifteen years ago)

oh JESUS CHRIST!

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 March 2010 11:50 (fifteen years ago)

don't be an asshole. you saw the same compromise of a compromise of a compromise I did.

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 March 2010 11:51 (fifteen years ago)

COME TO ME MORBIE

http://www.tomwhitestudio.com/images/Jesus_Christ_statue_600.jpg

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 11:51 (fifteen years ago)

I guess "riiiiiiiiight" is the kind of "bitchy one-liner" I usually perpetrate?

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 March 2010 11:52 (fifteen years ago)

those vote totals don't point to a lot of wiggle room, morbs. you want a health insurance card that works everywhere and allows you to never worry about paperwork or money? move to europe.

this from slimebag david frum:

Today’s defeat for free-market economics and Republican values is a huge win for the conservative entertainment industry. Their listeners and viewers will now be even more enraged, even more frustrated, even more disappointed in everybody except the responsibility-free talkers on television and radio. For them, it’s mission accomplished.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 11:53 (fifteen years ago)

for such a supposed cynic morbs i find your optimism that single payer health insurance could have passed the congress of the united states curious and refreshing

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 11:55 (fifteen years ago)

don't be an asshole. you saw the same compromise of a compromise of a compromise I did.

not debating that the bill wasn't great, debating that any better bill could've been passed in this climate, and that the failure to pass a better bill is because Obama etc were "losers"

Wat ho, goatee'd man? Thy skinnee jenes hath byrn'd my corneyas. (stevie), Monday, 22 March 2010 12:02 (fifteen years ago)

iow tracer otm

Wat ho, goatee'd man? Thy skinnee jenes hath byrn'd my corneyas. (stevie), Monday, 22 March 2010 12:02 (fifteen years ago)

sorry "move to europe" was a stupid and harsh thing to say. canada's much closer.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 12:06 (fifteen years ago)

The weather's better though.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 22 March 2010 12:08 (fifteen years ago)

ugh can we please change the thread title

max, Monday, 22 March 2010 12:26 (fifteen years ago)

your tweets onscreen was hilarious, this is gross

max, Monday, 22 March 2010 12:26 (fifteen years ago)

216 [Kathryn Jean Lopez]

Congratulations, Democrats. Beginning now, you own the health-care system in America. Every hiccup. Every complaint. Every long line. All yours.

03/21 10:48 PM Share

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 12:26 (fifteen years ago)

thread does not deliver

LiveJournal (acoleuthic), Monday, 22 March 2010 12:27 (fifteen years ago)

ongratulations ObamaNazi

aarrissi-a-roni, Monday, 22 March 2010 12:29 (fifteen years ago)

max otm

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 12:30 (fifteen years ago)

you will never pass thread title reform, abandon hope

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)

maybe i will start my own politics thread without the word "twat"

max, Monday, 22 March 2010 12:42 (fifteen years ago)

If you do, we can turn this thead into an argument over how to correctly pronounce it.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Monday, 22 March 2010 12:43 (fifteen years ago)

I will campaign to have a twat added to max's healthcare thread through reconciliation

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 12:44 (fifteen years ago)

lol it really is the most magnificently offensive word, I grimace just typing it

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 12:44 (fifteen years ago)

Trying to "debate" this on Facebook with an old roommate this morning and the only argument he can give me is that "17,000 IRS agents will now be checking into our health records to decide if we deserve health insurance". Seriously? Like, I might as well be banging my head against the wall instead. I may just go do that, less painful in the long run.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 22 March 2010 12:46 (fifteen years ago)

Some Vajayjays Onscreen

mdskltr (blueski), Monday, 22 March 2010 12:46 (fifteen years ago)

us politics thread: historic legislation mandates 'knocked up' as americas favorite movie

max, Monday, 22 March 2010 12:47 (fifteen years ago)

dr morbius: "this is my waterloo"

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 12:50 (fifteen years ago)

is that a better title

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:09 (fifteen years ago)

the arms race of morbius: couldn't escape if he wanted to...

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:10 (fifteen years ago)

hahahahahahahahaha

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:11 (fifteen years ago)

HI DERE you are a golden god

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:11 (fifteen years ago)

aww man

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:12 (fifteen years ago)

four more twats! four more twats!

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:12 (fifteen years ago)

haha not even I could leave that title there

enjoy yr new safer less offensive title until someone gives a better suggestion

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:13 (fifteen years ago)

damn i missed it

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 13:14 (fifteen years ago)

it had several twats but they were still not enough to satisfy the pro-twat lobby

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:16 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: dr morbius: "this is my waterloo"

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:16 (fifteen years ago)

it was US POLITICS: TWAT TWATS ONTWAT

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:16 (fifteen years ago)

So hey, you guys wanna see some crazy?

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:17 (fifteen years ago)

Would be funny re, Morbs except making fun of people in thread titles NOT NICE.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:17 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.mayday2010.org/images/stories/girlmemorial.jpg

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:17 (fifteen years ago)

Hi, I watched the vote last night on CNN's live Internet stream (I don't have cable). My main question is this: who was the bearded chap who seemed to be directing the proceedings, recognizing speakers and so forth?

jam master (jaymc), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:18 (fifteen years ago)

http://f2a.org/mayday/Airplane.jpghttp://f2a.org/mayday/BringABus.jpg

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:18 (fifteen years ago)

haha u r on fire

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:19 (fifteen years ago)

My main question is this: who was the bearded chap who seemed to be directing the proceedings, recognizing speakers and so forth?

bonnie 'prince' billy iirc

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:19 (fifteen years ago)

bring a bus!

Remington Q. (remy bean), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:19 (fifteen years ago)

it is like a sandra bullock movie about black people.

Remington Q. (remy bean), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:20 (fifteen years ago)

One Focus: God
One Purpose: Repentance
One Nation: Under God

kingkongvsgodzilla, Monday, 22 March 2010 13:20 (fifteen years ago)

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_n1vkfLObT4k/R97q90PnrCI/AAAAAAAABLU/E40tAMdD8A4/s320/commienazis.jpg

The United States Air Force test out their new logo and uniform, as designed by Obama's Czars.

Everybody Annabel Chong Tonight (King Boy Pato), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:20 (fifteen years ago)

Later Barack Hussein Obama will be conducting Kenyan under-bus sacrifice of Real Americans! Fun for the entire family!

There's a poll on that page and if I wasn't atheist I'd vote for the spiritual state of nation = 100 per cent YIPPEE option therein. Just to fuck with 'em.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)

Hi, I watched the vote last night on CNN's live Internet stream (I don't have cable). My main question is this: who was the bearded chap who seemed to be directing the proceedings, recognizing speakers and so forth?

― jam master (jaymc), Monday, March 22, 2010 9:18 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Obey

max, Monday, 22 March 2010 13:22 (fifteen years ago)

I voted "great" xpost

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:22 (fifteen years ago)

How do you rate the {spiritual condition} of our nation?

Great
Never better
Room for improvement
Indifferent
We really need to wake up

Remington Q. (remy bean), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:22 (fifteen years ago)

guys i am typing this from a re-education camp

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

ha I was about to post the poll options here as well

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

re: may day - now there's something I'll travel to our nation's capital to protest

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

someone should tell dr dobson that may day is int'l workers day

max, Monday, 22 March 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

we really need to wake up

Remington Q. (remy bean), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:24 (fifteen years ago)

what exactly is the difference between "great" and "never better" btw

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:24 (fifteen years ago)

This is within earshot of my office and I'm almost disappointed that it's on a weekend.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Monday, 22 March 2010 13:24 (fifteen years ago)

Thanks max -- was Obey presiding as chair of the House appropriations committee?

jam master (jaymc), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)

i think he was just presiding as speaker pro tempore as designated by pelosi, not in any capacity w/r/t his chairmanship except that shed want to ask a senior leadership member to preside

max, Monday, 22 March 2010 13:29 (fifteen years ago)

"Hi, Godless Heathens internationale, how can I help?"

http://clioandme.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/may1.jpeg

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:31 (fifteen years ago)

why hasn't the rep who called stupak a babykiller stepped forward to claim the praise of pro-lifers? thought there would be more news on that this morning tbh.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:40 (fifteen years ago)

Serious question - is there any reason to believe that this bill is going to let me (28, self-employed) buy a reasonable health insurance plan (ie doctor co-pays from day 1, reasonable deductibles on big procedures) for less than $200/month?

― FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT IN THE PARKING LOT! (milo z), Monday, March 22, 2010 1:32 AM (7 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^^ this. I think I might need to incorporate to drive my base income down to get max subsidies...

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:41 (fifteen years ago)

Chuck Norris really bringin the nutso today

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:44 (fifteen years ago)

that is awesome

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 13:47 (fifteen years ago)

"there's something very, very wrong on the horizon"

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 13:47 (fifteen years ago)

"this health-care bill eventually will be so far reaching that it will become a major foundation for a fundamentally different America from which will sprout many tentacles"

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 13:48 (fifteen years ago)

Serious question - is there any reason to believe that this bill is going to let me (28, self-employed) buy a reasonable health insurance plan (ie doctor co-pays from day 1, reasonable deductibles on big procedures) for less than $200/month?

― FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT IN THE PARKING LOT! (milo z), Monday, March 22, 2010 1:32 AM (7 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

depends on how much money you make--theoretically you wont have to pay more than 10% of your income and may pay as little as 3%

this is a v. rough calculator: http://healthreform.kff.org/SubsidyCalculator.aspx

max, Monday, 22 March 2010 13:48 (fifteen years ago)

"This is not just a health-care bill, but a metastasizing tool and weapon"

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 13:48 (fifteen years ago)

http://k-punk.abstractdynamics.org/archives/cthulhu_800.jpg

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 13:48 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.wnd.com/images/banners/MayDayBanner-468x60.jpg

Wat ho, goatee'd man? Thy skinnee jenes hath byrn'd my corneyas. (stevie), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:49 (fifteen years ago)

Chuck Norris: Metastasizing tool.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:49 (fifteen years ago)

Que i have to admit if i saw that on the horizon i would also be somewhat upset

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 13:49 (fifteen years ago)

(To inspire and renew the founding spirit of our republic, Chuck encourages patriots everywhere to purchase the brand new photo book, "Don't Tread on Us!," for which he has written the foreword. The book is a collection of motivating and patriotic photos from rallies, tea parties and protests over the past year around the country.)

Wat ho, goatee'd man? Thy skinnee jenes hath byrn'd my corneyas. (stevie), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:50 (fifteen years ago)

(To inspire and renew the founding spirit of our republic, Chuck encourages patriots everywhere to purchase the brand new photo book, "Don't Tread on Us!," for which he has written the foreword. The book is a collection of motivating and patriotic photos from rallies, tea parties and protests over the past year around the country.)

Oh my God

my birthday was last week so anybody lookin to show me late birthday love should totally buy me this

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:52 (fifteen years ago)

I luv u like a brother but fuck sending Chuck Norris money

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:53 (fifteen years ago)

I'm all for sending Chuck a metastasizing tool.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:54 (fifteen years ago)

can we put together a real-world chuck norris facts then

Chuck Norris does not need money. He is gainfully employed.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:54 (fifteen years ago)

my birthday was last week so anybody lookin to show me late birthday love should totally buy me this

socialist income-redistribution theory dictates that the richest person on the board should buy it for you, so I'm out

Religious Embolism (WmC), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:55 (fifteen years ago)

"Is there really a period of calm before a storm?"

His answer: There definitely is.

Foster noted, "It was recognized long ago that before a severe storm, the air is still and the birds stop singing and go to shelter."

What's true with weather is also true with Washington.

Many patriots have stopped singing. Some have gone into hiding. Others are gathering wood as we trudge through this Valley Forge. But all will reawaken and fight for the republic our founders laid down for us.

so psyched for chuck norris' remake of 'the birds'

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:55 (fifteen years ago)

Chuck Norris usually prevails in hand-to-hand combat, as he has extensive training in this field, although it would be unrealistic to imagine that a few guys with baseball bats wouldn't prove an unsurmountable obstacle.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:57 (fifteen years ago)

for such a supposed cynic morbs i find your optimism that single payer health insurance could have passed the congress of the united states curious and refreshing

DIDN'T SAY IT

No one here actually reads my posts, so quitting again.

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:57 (fifteen years ago)

great now this is turning into the Chuck Norris thread

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 13:57 (fifteen years ago)

OK journalists, how about asking for a review copy to give to J0hn? The author always takes a financial hit for those so Chuck Norris himself would be subsidizing J0hn's enjoyment here.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:57 (fifteen years ago)

Today health care reform, tomorrow OSAMA

http://rastapopulus.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/chuck-norris-album2.jpg

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:57 (fifteen years ago)

fwiw I am a patriot and I'm totally singing, in fact I sang all day yesterday and then watched some other people sing

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:57 (fifteen years ago)

Wow, Chuck must be where my FB crazies get their motivation. One choice status this morning: "THEY WILL KNOW THE STORM IS HERE IN NOVEMBER! WE WILL NOT SIT IDLY BY, THE APOCALYPSE IS COMING LIBERALS!"

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:58 (fifteen years ago)

Chuck needs to get into classical music and opera, whole lot of singing there

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:58 (fifteen years ago)

also how does one come liberals? that sounds painful?

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:58 (fifteen years ago)

Today health care, tomorrow KILLER TIMBER WOLVES

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_bKJdH4htxxI/SJ2SQhOUGUI/AAAAAAAAAC4/GRv1QUdxgeI/s400/fark_chuck_norris_dog.jpg

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:59 (fifteen years ago)

No one here actually reads my posts, so quitting again.

I spend 1/6 of my board time bein dr save-a-morbs so I will totally kick yr butt if you try quittin again, you yankees fan, you

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 13:59 (fifteen years ago)

Like anyone, Chuck Norris hopes earnestly that science will someday find a cure for cancer. His particular skill set is of no use whatsoever in the quest for such a cure.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:01 (fifteen years ago)

When Chuck Norris goes to burger king, he enjoys the Whopper (TM) Meal. He idd once request a Big Mac (TM) Meal, but quickly realised his mistake and everyone involved enjoyed a good laugh. He did not physically assault anyone involved

DarraghmacKwacz (darraghmac), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:02 (fifteen years ago)

omg

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:03 (fifteen years ago)

we are all gonna get stupid rich off Chuck Norris Real World Facts

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:03 (fifteen years ago)

am i the only one reading a subtext of violence into chuck's declaration of the impending storm of patriot birds or what

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:04 (fifteen years ago)

^^^^^ Would pay MTV to produce this show.

xpost

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:04 (fifteen years ago)

Chuck Norris doesn't sleep much, as his need for sleep has decreased with advancing age.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)

This reminded me of the time when I attended a speech given by Ernie Titts, senior resident in astrophysics at NASA's jet propulsion laboratories. I said, Ernie, does the thin end of a wedge imply that the bigger end will soon follow?

"Definitely," he said. Definitely.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)

Dressed up and ready to fight health care:

http://www.filmjunk.com/images/weblog/2009/03/chucknorris1.jpg

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)

This reminded me of the time when I attended a speech given by Ernie Titts, senior resident in astrophysics at NASA's jet propulsion laboratories. I said, Ernie, does the thin end of a wedge imply that the bigger end will soon follow?

"Definitely," he said. Definitely.

^^^ btw I don't think this applies here at all tbqf

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:08 (fifteen years ago)

for a brief, wonderful moment, I really thought Chuck Norris was namechecking a dude named Ernie Titts

life was beautiful then

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:10 (fifteen years ago)

xpost but the next time the Dems are reducing expectations & dialing back stuff they argued they actually wanted & generally making a mess of being the left-of-center party in power I'm going to remind you of how the health care bill, which helps a lot of people no doubt & good to hear it but whose shortcomings are well known to even its greatest proponents, was "the thin end of the wedge"

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:10 (fifteen years ago)

hey i'm just talkin bout Chuck.. at least that's what i assume he means by his metastasizing tentacle reference

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 14:12 (fifteen years ago)

but enough about Chuck's metastasizing tentacle

Chuck Norris once stopped a speeding locomotive, by pulling on the emergency brake. He was identified by fellow passengers and made to pay a fine.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 14:13 (fifteen years ago)

I don't mind the thin edge of the wedge assuming of course that we are discussing delicious salads

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)

lol my bad Tracer!

Chuck Norris has no chief export. He is a not a country.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)

216 [Kathryn Jean Lopez]

Congratulations, Democrats. Beginning now, you own the health-care system in America. Every hiccup. Every complaint. Every long line. All yours.

03/21 10:48 PM Share

If only this thinking could be applied to private industry.

Ned Trifle II, Monday, 22 March 2010 14:15 (fifteen years ago)

welcome to 1948 yall

rip sarah silverman 3/19/10 never forget (history mayne), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:16 (fifteen years ago)

ok just one more these are really obnoxious I know.

On a high school math test, Chuck Norris put down "Violence" as every one of the answers. His parents were called to the school for a parent-teacher conference, and young Charles explained that it had seemed funny to him at the time and was sorry if he had given anybody the wrong impression.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:18 (fifteen years ago)

er, no, history mayne

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 14:20 (fifteen years ago)

made a gif that reenacts Morbs' reaction to the health care bill and then his leaving this thread forever:

http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/8094/1269263072386.gif

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 14:22 (fifteen years ago)

morbs is on the right

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 14:22 (fifteen years ago)

wha

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:24 (fifteen years ago)

morbs is on the right

Of whom – Dennis Perrin?

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:25 (fifteen years ago)

of the giffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 14:25 (fifteen years ago)

Wow wow wow wow wow wow people really, truly believe that the government will be calling them this week and telling them what health care provider they MUST use and what rate they MUST pay. SMH

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)

just wait until they find grandma is still alive

for me to chilt on (bnw), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:42 (fifteen years ago)

On the positive side, this is really giving me an easy way to determine what "friends" need to be either pruned or hidden from my feed.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:48 (fifteen years ago)

Derbyshire, about to slit his wrists in the bath:

As the fugleman for conservative despair, I am of course neither shaken nor stirred at the passing of the health-care bills. It was to be expected.

I see plainly that Western civilization, over my lifetime, has been a slow-sinking ship. The few who have known what is happening have worked desperately to seal the watertight doors, repair the fissures, pump out the flooded zones. It's been a losing fight, though. The tilt of the decks is harder and harder to ignore. Last night, a major bulkhead gave way. Soon a funnel will topple over with a great crash and a shower of sparks. Yet still the band is playing, the people are dancing, the food coming up from the galley.

Steven Hayward, writing about my latest in the Claremont Review of Books, says it is "surprising that Derbyshire never raises the obvious question: without the conservative movement of the past 50 years, how much worse would things be?" Not much, would be my answer.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)

Yet still the band is playing, the people are dancing, the food coming up from the galley.

Soon, J-Lo will let go of Jonah Goldberg's hand, and watch him drift down slowly through the dark sea. . .Moments later, the gigantic iceberg she is floating on will crack and collapse from the massive weight upon it, and as her body falls into the water, a giant whirlpool begins to swirl around, capturing everything around it for ten miles. . .

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 14:56 (fifteen years ago)

LOLLLLL thinking you meant K-Lo...

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:57 (fifteen years ago)

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_G4n4l6l1DBY/Sfet-Fon6vI/AAAAAAAAA2k/qJlGk8moezI/s400/butt-jennifer-lopez-400a062007.jpg

oh to be that iceberg

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 14:59 (fifteen years ago)

hee hee oops!

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 14:59 (fifteen years ago)

still funny i guess

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 14:59 (fifteen years ago)

K-Lo is played by J-Lo's butt

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 15:00 (fifteen years ago)

Jennifer Lopez will play National Review editor Kathryn-Jean Lopez in the upcoming William F. Buckley, Jr. biopic, directed by Jason Reitman

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 15:00 (fifteen years ago)

Nicholas Cage will play the avuncular founder of the conservative weekly

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)

what the hell was wrong with YOUR TWEETS ONSCREEN i ask u

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)

who was it who said she looked like a dog licked her hair, because I remember that every time I see her name and it never ceases to crack me the fuck up

smoking cigarette shades? it doesn't even make any sense. (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

oh to be that iceberg

I think it's pronounced assberg.

Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 22 March 2010 15:03 (fifteen years ago)

j-lo: my butt is an iceberg

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 15:03 (fifteen years ago)

sooo, assuming that there is some kind of defeat deflation effect (akin to the power of president scott brown), the GOP might just roll over and not pull any crazy shit against the senate reconciliation?

haha.

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)

que i need to know the story behind yr gif or i shan't sleep tonite

Wat ho, goatee'd man? Thy skinnee jenes hath byrn'd my corneyas. (stevie), Monday, 22 March 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)

kinda wonder how her colleagues feel about her

Judging by the way they let her walk around the NRO office with no makeup and her hair looking like it's been licked by a dog a few times, not very much.

― lihaperäpukamat (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, October 28, 2009 5:24 PM (4 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

let us all thank Alfred for this image

stevie i got the gif from the noise lols thread

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)

what the hell was wrong with YOUR TWEETS ONSCREEN i ask u

― goole, Monday, March 22, 2010 11:01 AM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

asking the important questions

max, Monday, 22 March 2010 15:08 (fifteen years ago)

if cnn desperation isn't funny to u i dunno how we can even have a conversation

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 15:10 (fifteen years ago)

one of my wingnut FB friends is quoting "Sunday Bloody Sunday" right now wr2 the health-care bill ...

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Monday, 22 March 2010 15:18 (fifteen years ago)

you should link the Wikipedia page for that song as a response

big time (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 15:21 (fifteen years ago)

Fire Nancy Pelosi

the artist formerly known as (remy bean), Monday, 22 March 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

Ha! 40 seats! good luck dipshits

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.firenancypelosi.com/disclaimer.jpg

the artist formerly known as (remy bean), Monday, 22 March 2010 15:24 (fifteen years ago)

steele goin ham

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

Dow Jones up 40 this morning, hmmmm.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

In the Bush administration, this was standard practice. Any Democrat who resisted any component of a bill was accused of opposing the bill's objective. If you complained about labor provisions of the bill to establish a federal department of homeland security, Republicans said you were against homeland security. If you objected to part of the "Patriot Act," they said you were unpatriotic. If you criticized Bush's execution of the Iraq war, they said you were undermining our troops.
Obama has avoided this scorched-earth style of politics. But his advisers seem ready to try it. "Let them tell a child with a pre-existing condition, 'We don't think you should be covered,' " David Axelrod said of Republicans last night. On This Week, David Plouffe added:
We're going to go out there and not just talk about what we're for, but what the Republicans are voting against. They are siding with the insurance companies over people who are denied coverage for pre-existing conditions, siding with the insurance companies over saving seniors money. So this isn't just about us being a pinata here in the election. Elections are about choices. They are voting against an enormous tax cut for health care for 40 million middle-class families and 4 million small businesses.

http://www.slate.com/id/2248513/?from=rss

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 22 March 2010 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

procedural note, via tpm:

The Senate parliamentary rules are that a reconciliation measure cannot be considered unless it is actually reconciling existing law. So Obama has to sign the bill before debate can start in the upper chamber.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)

amazing how reflexive that behavior is for the GOP. i read some quotes from an axelrod vs rove show, and axelrod was clearly fucking with him, at one point said something like "you should roll out another 'mission accomplished' banner or something" and rove responded with "don't denigrate the people carrying out the mission of the USS abraham lincoln." it just rolled off the tongue.

xp huh interesting

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

If you complained about labor provisions of the bill to establish a federal department of homeland security, Republicans said you were against homeland security. If you objected to part of the "Patriot Act," they said you were unpatriotic. If you criticized Bush's execution of the Iraq war, they said you were undermining our troops.
Obama has avoided this scorched-earth style of politics. But his advisers seem ready to try it. "Let them tell a child with a pre-existing condition, 'We don't think you should be covered,' " David Axelrod said of Republicans last night. On This Week, David Plouffe added:

OK this is bullshit false equivalence.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/mlm/healthscatter.png

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

what does the size of the circle mean?

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

amazing how reflexive that behavior is for the GOP. i read some quotes from an axelrod vs rove show, and axelrod was clearly fucking with him, at one point said something like "you should roll out another 'mission accomplished' banner or something" and rove responded with "don't denigrate the people carrying out the mission of the USS abraham lincoln." it just rolled off the tongue.

this was plouffe, not axelrod--plouffe is much funnier/meaner

max, Monday, 22 March 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)

what does the size of the circle mean?

inversely proportional to penis size

big time (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)

This was on ABC's "This Week" yesterday.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)

Rove: "This thing is paid for with Bernie-Madoff-style accounting. ... It's a gigantic disaster."

Plouffe: "Karl and the Republicans would be familiar with that."

Rove: "You will bankrupt the country if this bill
passes. ... For God's sake, will you stop throwing around epitaphs
[sic] and deal with the facts for once, Da...vid? ... We will fight the
election on this,. and the Democrats will have significant losses in
the House and Senate as a result of this bill."

Plouffe: "If Karl and a lot of Republicans want to
call the election already, they ought to break out that 'Mission
Accomplished' banner."

Rove: "That's cheesy, David. ... You should not denigrate the mission of the USS Abraham Lincoln."

max, Monday, 22 March 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)

ha i love that. it's like two comedians fucking w/ each other and then he remembers he's still onstage, WTF CHEESY DUDE COME ON oh wait CRYING EAGLE DOT JPEG I HAVE SINNED AGAINST U MY LORD

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 15:54 (fifteen years ago)

Would love Plouffe to say 'OH NOES AN EAGLE, HE CRYING' in one of these faceoffs.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

Robert Reich's view.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

what does the size of the circle mean?

inversely proportional to penis size

― big time (HI DERE), Monday, March 22, 2010 3:48 PM (25 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

so norwegian penii are ∞ ?

caek, Monday, 22 March 2010 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

apparently it's doctor visits per capita

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

here's the same data -

http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/mlm/6a00e0098226918833012876674340970c-800wi.jpg

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 16:24 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/03/21/us/health-care-reform.html

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

japan sure seems to be doing something right

max, Monday, 22 March 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

why are they visiting the doctor once a month tho

max, Monday, 22 March 2010 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

super gross sex comics must keep you healthy i guess

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2010/03/29/100329crbo_books_mayer?printable=true

daaa aaaaamn

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

Torture, a love letter

mayor jingleberries, Monday, 22 March 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

160% of foxnews.com visitors think it's (go on, guess)

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/03/21/decide-health-care-victory-america/

StanM, Monday, 22 March 2010 16:59 (fifteen years ago)

LOL the positive one even starts of "it's not perfect"

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

This is not a scientific poll.

Wat ho, goatee'd man? Thy skinnee jenes hath byrn'd my corneyas. (stevie), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:10 (fifteen years ago)

xp Well, does *anyone* actually think it's perfect?

jam master (jaymc), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:18 (fifteen years ago)

anybody have some perspective on the brewing legal challenges to the hrc bill? something about the mandatory coverage clause being unconstitutional? how does that work

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

Well, does *anyone* actually think it's perfect?

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_mJmwQtPmusk/SfYZ1cjoTRI/AAAAAAAADwI/MRWQ9zahPKY/s400/strawman2.jpg

this guy does

big time (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

Oh hey! I know that dude. I'm always arguing with him.

Mordy, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

dude is a duck imo

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:22 (fifteen years ago)

i mean a dick

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:22 (fifteen years ago)

quack

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:22 (fifteen years ago)

I know his IP address, he's actually a sock.

Religious Embolism (WmC), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)

Tracer, I think you meant "duck"

big time (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)

fuckin hate it when ducks post on ilx

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:25 (fifteen years ago)

ducks suck

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:25 (fifteen years ago)

i mean dicks

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, i suck dicks

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

D'OH

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.entreesint.co.uk/products/images/toilet2.jpg

kingkongvsgodzilla, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

I, for one, am never buying a product called "Toilet Dick"

big time (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

I sometimes wake up in the middle of the night with Toilet Dick

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:27 (fifteen years ago)

and I'm like "Hey Toilet Dick, get out of my bed."

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

but seriously folks

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

xxp But it investigates the grime and build-up in your bowl!

jam master (jaymc), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

"Toilet Dick" is when you blame your herpes on public conveniences imo

DarraghmacKwacz (darraghmac), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

"that? oh don't you worry about that, darlin, it's just a little touch of toilet dick"

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

very happy this bill passed the house just in time for the toilet dick epidemic

big time (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:32 (fifteen years ago)

toilet dick has never caused a problem for me, dan, i don't know why you're making this into a big deal

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:33 (fifteen years ago)

"Toilet Dick" cld also be a plumber that sleuths on the side

DarraghmacKwacz (darraghmac), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:34 (fifteen years ago)

jaymc made that joke, bruv

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:35 (fifteen years ago)

oic that now

DarraghmacKwacz (darraghmac), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:35 (fifteen years ago)

does it sleuth right or left

big time (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:35 (fifteen years ago)

when you've got toilet dick it really opens up the sleuth in all directions tbh

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

toilet dick = peryonie's disease iirc

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

don't GIS that at work btw

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

don't cross the streams--that's how you get toilet dick

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)

a friend forwarded some choice freeper reax:

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
I feel worse today than I did on 9/11. Instead of 3000 murderers, about 33 million will be murdered by Obama’s henchmen. No doubt about it. This will weave violent ripples throughout our once proud Republic.
109 posted on 03/21/2010 10:26:02 PM PDT by Soothesayer9

To: Soothesayer9
I feel like a Jew on the night the Nuremberg Laws were passed.
110 posted on 03/21/2010 10:26:30 PM PDT by dfwgator

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

mitt romney is a duck:

(Obama) calls his accomplishment “historic” — in this he is correct, although not for the reason he intends. Rather, it is an historic usurpation of the legislative process — he unleashed the nuclear option, enlisted not a single Republican vote in either chamber, bribed reluctant members of his own party, paid-off his union backers, scapegoated insurers, and justified his act with patently fraudulent accounting. What Barack Obama has ushered into the American political landscape is not good for our country; in the words of an ancient maxim, “what starts twisted, ends twisted.”

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:47 (fifteen years ago)

is that really an ancient maxim??

call all destroyer, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:48 (fifteen years ago)

it's one of the first written references to toilet dick

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

is that really an ancient maxim??

kind of--it was the slogan for the movie Twister

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

not familiar with that ancient maxim either; must be a mormon thing? or a duck thing

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/20/AR2010032002556.html

please please please let whomever is running against Bachman use this against her to the fullest degree

big time (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.gop.com/

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:51 (fifteen years ago)

"what starts twisted, ends twisted" apparently is an ancient maxim that Romney made up if Google is to be believed

big time (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:52 (fifteen years ago)

Toilet Dick: what started twisted, then becomes untwisted, thanks to Obama's healthcare plan

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:53 (fifteen years ago)

romney is referring to the ancient riddle: "what starts with a T, ends with a T, and has T in it"

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

This is the most chill socialist apocalypse I have ever lived in.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:57 (fifteen years ago)

/Fck_yew/

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

haha max

big time (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

someone with more knowledge tell me: is there any validity to claims that this bill will lead to fewer primary care doctors and doctors willing to treat medicare and medicaid patients, because payments are going to go down? Are medical students really so disheartened by the future of medicine where compensation is concerned? because I keep hearing this, but the reports I actually hear from medical students and doctors don't seem to actually jibe with it.

akm, Monday, 22 March 2010 18:01 (fifteen years ago)

One slice of BS in a massive shitstorm.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 22 March 2010 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

I feel like a Jew on the night the Nuremberg Laws were passed.

I just mean WOW

Religious Embolism (WmC), Monday, 22 March 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

The great mystery of the passage of health care reform is resolved. Who yelled "baby killer" at Bart Stupak during the debate over the motion to recommit? Texas Republican Rep. Randy Neugebauer just now issued the following statement:

“Last night was the climax of weeks and months of debate on a health care bill that my constituents fear and do not support. In the heat and emotion of the debate, I exclaimed the phrase ‘it's a baby killer' in reference to the agreement reached by the Democratic leadership. While I remain heartbroken over the passage of this bill and the tragic consequences it will have for the unborn, I deeply regret that my actions were mistakenly interpreted as a direct reference to Congressman Stupak himself.
“I have apologized to Mr. Stupak and also apologize to my colleagues for the manner in which I expressed my disappointment about the bill. The House Chamber is a place of decorum and respect. The timing and tone of my comment last night was inappropriate.”

Read more: http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2010/03/22/neugebauer-admits-to-yelling-baby-killer/#ixzz0ivmcuyxY

Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 22 March 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

Noam Chomsky interviewed about health reform:

"If I were in Congress," he said, "I'd probably hold my nose and vote for it, because the alternative of not passing it is worse, bad as this bill is. Unfortunately, that's the reality."

...

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor added that it’s a damning referendum on American democracy that one of the most highly supported components of the effort nationally, the public insurance option, was jettisoned.

"It didn't have 'political support,' just the support of the majority of the population," Chomsky quipped, "which apparently is not political support in our dysfunctional democracy."

"There should be headlines explaining why, for decades, what's been called politically impossible is what most of the public has wanted," Chomsky said. "There should be headlines explaining what that means about the political system and the media."

http://rawstory.com/2010/03/noam-chomsky-health-bill/

o. nate, Monday, 22 March 2010 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

I'm shocked--shocked!--that the guy who yelled "baby killer!" is also a birther. Birthers have always seemed so rational, so intelligent.

xpost

kate78, Monday, 22 March 2010 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

ha, i'm not really buying that explanation. "what NO i was't calling YOU a bitch, I was, uh, referring to the situation, like, it's a total bitch that we're fighting right now."

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

so, what's next: many small-bore jobs bills; financial regulation reform; immigration reform?

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

tequila shots, hand jobs, self-loathing and mutual recriminations

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 18:44 (fifteen years ago)

better!

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 18:44 (fifteen years ago)

"mutual recriminations" sounds entertaining.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 18:44 (fifteen years ago)

I don't know if this was posted elsewhere but here is David Frum saying "STFU, my party, you are not helping":

http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/03/22/frum.healthcare.gop.strategy/index.html?hpt=T2

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

Lookit all those pissed-off white men in that photo attached to the Frum column.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

"In the heat and emotion of the debate, I exclaimed the phrase ‘cheer up, baby, killer party in my chambers after the vote' in reference to the agreement reached by the Democratic leadership and in the general direction of Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MI)... I deeply regret that my actions were mistakenly interpreted as a direct reference to Congressman Stupak himself, most notably by Rep. Bachmann."

Guayaquil (eephus!), Monday, 22 March 2010 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

I heard him and he did not say 'it's a', just 'baby killer' on its own. Twat.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:06 (fifteen years ago)

it's a motherfucker babykiller

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

Twat is a baby killer? That seems counter-productive

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

"What is that expression you Americans use? 'That's a baby killer!'"
"We just say 'baby killer.'"

Chris L, Monday, 22 March 2010 19:12 (fifteen years ago)

Fear is the babykiller
Fear is the little death that brings total obliteration (to the fetus in your womb)

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

Oh so THAT'S what was in the basket.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 22 March 2010 19:15 (fifteen years ago)

Fear is lotion

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 19:19 (fifteen years ago)

Spicy!

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

look if we can't have YOUR TWEETS ONSCREEN, can we at least have

US POLITICS: Congratulation to USA for their upcoming health

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

why not

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

allah!

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 19:22 (fifteen years ago)

look if we can't have YOUR TWEETS ONSCREEN, can we at least have

US POLITICS: Congratulation to USA for their upcoming health

US POLITICS: TOO MUCH DEMOCRACY

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: HEY I LIKE THE TITLE OF THIS THREAD

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

I never thought I'd live to see the day when the USA finally turned into a civilized country like the rest of us communist dictatorships where doctors have to work for free and all babies are killed and their blood is sacrificed to satan.

StanM, Monday, 22 March 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

I been biting my tongue on this one, but fuck it.

US POLITICS: YOUR SKEETS ON TWEEN

kingkongvsgodzilla, Monday, 22 March 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

LOL

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 22 March 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: I DON'T GET WHY ADDING A SUBTITLE TO EVERY THREAD IS A THING NOW ON ILX

ô_o (Nicole), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:30 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: BECAUSE IT'S HOW THE KIDS COMMUNICATE THESE DAYS, WITH THEIR SKINNY JEANS AND PALESTINIAN SCARVES AND AMBIGUOUS SEXUALITY

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: SECRET CHEESE BABY KILLERS

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: VAMPIRE WEEKEND

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: SYMMETRY REQUIRED GABBNEB TO START THIS

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

US politics: better than numbered threads imho

Religious Embolism (WmC), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: AT LEAST YOU'RE NOT READING ILM

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 19:35 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/8094/1269263072386.gif

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

i think all subtitles should be surm thread titles

US POLITICS: i'm wearing a really gay outfit: fashion risks for better or for worse

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: PREPARE FOR CIVIL WAR.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: what is this thing that men do, they put their hand down their pants when lounging around?

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: I THOUGHT YOU WERE MY BOYFRIEND

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: GET OFF OF MY LAWN

ô_o (Nicole), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: CHECK OUT MY BERET IT'S HAWT

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:39 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: WHO'S HIDING THE PAD OF IMPEACHMENT FORMS?

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: NANANANANANA WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWIIIEEEEEEEE THAT PENIS I SLIPPED ON A PUBLIC BATHROOM WAS GOOOOOOOOOOOD

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:44 (fifteen years ago)

waht

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

how do you.. you know what, no

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

You know what, no would be a good subtitle.

ô_o (Nicole), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: NO

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

catchy

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: POOPING IN THE SHOWER (DON'T WORRY IT'S A METAPHOR; THE POOP IS THE TENOR AND THE SHOWER IS THE VEHICLE)

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

THE POOP IS THE TENOR is dangerously close to being a life motto

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

us politics: rip democratic capitalist republic once known as America

aarrissi-a-roni, Monday, 22 March 2010 19:49 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: When reasonably minded people who only want the best for America come together in discourse and chat with their indoor voice.

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

too many good subtitle choices here.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

we need a poll.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

it's the American way.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 22 March 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: WE NEED A POLL

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: LET THE WOOKIE WIN

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:53 (fifteen years ago)

We've got enough title suggestions to last us through Romney's two terms.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: BABY KILLERS ITT

corrine bailey the chef (J0rdan S.), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:55 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: WHAT STARTS TWISTED, ENDS TWISTED

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: BART STUPAK NEEDS A NEW PROM DATE

In response to Rep. Bart Stupak’s announcement that he and other self-labeled “pro-life” Democrats will vote in favor of Healthcare reform legislation with the addition of an Executive Order from the White House to address concerns about abortion funding, Susan B. Anthony List Candidate Fund President Marjorie Dannenfelser offered the following statement:

“This Wednesday night is our third annual Campaign for Life Gala, where we were planning to honor Congressman Stupak for his efforts to keep abortion-funding out of health care reform-We will no longer be doing so. By accepting this deal from the most pro-abortion President in American history, Stupak has not only failed to stand strong for unborn children, but also for his constituents and pro-life voters across the country.”

“Let me be clear: any representative, including Rep. Stupak, who votes for this healthcare bill can no longer call themselves ‘pro-life.’…”

Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 22 March 2010 19:57 (fifteen years ago)

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE)

kills me!

kate78, Monday, 22 March 2010 19:59 (fifteen years ago)

Why are they calling it the "Campaign for Life Gala"? It should be called what it is, the "Capriciously Bitchy Gala".

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

That's a typo, s/b Campaign for Life Day Gala

http://www.looptvandfilm.com/blog/liferobes.jpg

Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 22 March 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

"the most pro-abortion president in history"

really? reminds me of the one rep who argued last night that hcr was "the most pro-abortion legislation since roe v. wade."

do you guys remember when congress voted to pass roe vs. wade? neither do i!

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

I for one welcome our new anti-life overlords

mayor jingleberries, Monday, 22 March 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

us politics: but i poop from there!

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Monday, 22 March 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

All this foofaraw has inspired me to get into Facebook arguments with my conservative relatives. Tune in tomorrow when I ask the musical question, "Who has created more human misery in the last five years: Al Qaeda or AIG Financial Products Division?"

Religious Embolism (WmC), Monday, 22 March 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)

answer: "obama"

see, easy.

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

might steal that status update.

kate78, Monday, 22 March 2010 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

I'm a bit worried about the Repubs taking congress and the next presidential election. What sort of damage will they do? Any thoughts?

CaptainLorax, Monday, 22 March 2010 20:55 (fifteen years ago)

*Washington will become "PalinTown USA"
*Everyone will be required to own a gun
*same thing for snowmachines

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)

*they will eliminate the liberal cities of New York and San Francisco

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)

will I still be able to buy BBQ chips at the supermarket?

ksh, Monday, 22 March 2010 20:58 (fifteen years ago)

*public high school science textbooks:
http://static.open.salon.com/files/jesus_dinosaur1234467260.jpg

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Monday, 22 March 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

tbh i think the democrats have been predicted to have significant midterm losses for the past year now, i'm not sure that the passage of hrc really changes anything that much except giving pols & pundits a peg to hang their election narratives on

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

hcr ^ i mean

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

will I still be able to buy BBQ chips at the supermarket?

Be able to? Hell, you'll be force-fed BBQ chips until you have the diabeetus.

Religious Embolism (WmC), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

every time I see the acronym HCR I think people are talking about legislating Hillary

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

hahahaha me too

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

To: Soothesayer9
I feel like a Jew on the night the Nuremberg Laws were passed.
110 posted on 03/21/2010 10:26:30 PM PDT by dfwgator

i know i already asked this but WTF THESE PEOPLE SO RILED UP ABT?? now im getting riled up not understanding what theyre so riled up abt - it doesnt make any sense at all

ice cr?m, Monday, 22 March 2010 21:14 (fifteen years ago)

A satanic black man is their president! This is like hell x 666 for them.

StanM, Monday, 22 March 2010 21:15 (fifteen years ago)

joe that commenter is an unborn baby and is afraid that the hcr legislation will result in his being aborted

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)

Am guessing 'soothesayer' a misspelling and not a neologism.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:18 (fifteen years ago)

Oh, and they're stew-pit. Look at this guy. He's the founder of teaparty dot org:

http://washingtonindependent.com/73036/n-word-sign-dogs-would-be-tea-party-leader

StanM, Monday, 22 March 2010 21:18 (fifteen years ago)

ice cr?m, here's one from the LA Times comment section that may shed a little light...

At long last, after a century and a half, black
lynches white. Hallelulah.

Posted by: Frank Thompson | March 21, 2010 at 08:41 PM

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:24 (fifteen years ago)

Babies would die from fright if they had to gaze upon this.

http://www.cbsnews.com/i/tim//2010/03/22/image6323194x_370x278.jpg

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)

aw, but he looks like a gigantic newborn!

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:29 (fifteen years ago)

http://i48.tinypic.com/2v2vzsz.jpg

k3vin k., Monday, 22 March 2010 21:30 (fifteen years ago)

The lawsuits have already began

CaptainLorax, Monday, 22 March 2010 21:31 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah and Orly Taitz keeps filing lawsuits too.

Things have moved on a bit from Mitsubishis.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploads16/Obama+ecstasy+pills+031259885806.jpg

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:32 (fifteen years ago)

I'm a bit worried about the Repubs taking congress and the next presidential election. What sort of damage will they do? Any thoughts?

Running on a policy of eliminating the new protections from pre-existing conditions and taking away medicare from 30+ million who now have it may not be the best move. I'm sure they are praying to JHVH the economy doesn't bounce back in any significant way.

A Republican/Tea Party merger should be coming up soon I'd say. The anti-gov't stance they've been pushing is going to be the totality of their platform in order to appeal to this new voting block. That and NO DEAD BABIES

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 22 March 2010 21:37 (fifteen years ago)

any britishes wanna debate the wisdom of Ramesh Ponnoru's "English friend"?

In Britain the introduction of the NHS was passionately supported by both parties. Tory opposition to the legislation accepted the principle of medical care free at the point of consumption and concentrated instead on secondary questions. It could hardly have done otherwise since Churchill's wartime coalition government had developed its own plans for a single-payer system of universal health insurance—along with other statist social welfare measures.

At the time of its passage the cost-benefit structure of the new British system was radically opposite to that of Obamacare. Its benefits—mainly the extension of free medical care from the poor to the middle class—came at once; its costs were delayed for a decade and a half as almost all budgetary health allocations went to current spending and almost none to capital investment. Not until 1962 did a British government embark on a hospital building program; until then—and for many years afterwards—the national health service lived off the fixed capital invested by private Victorian philanthropy. (Even a few years ago you could tell this from the appearance of the buildings.) The advance of medical science today makes a repeat of this performance quite impossible. So the money to meet the increasing demand for medical services will have to come from somewhere other than the capital budget. Where?

Rationing is implicit in both Obamacare and the NHS. But the customers of both systems are very different. Most modern Americans get good health care. They have learned to expect it. They will complain if they don't get it. And they have their present care as a method of comparison to any new system. Brits in 1948 had just survived a terrible war. Rationing was part of their everyday lives. They were a deferential people to begin with in a much more hierarchical society. Brits of today would be much much harder to convince—if they had not got used to getting free but inadequate health care.

And the ratio of winners to losers in both cases is very different. As the previous paragraph suggests, there were no real losers in the Britain of 1948. Only a tiny handful of very rich people had any experience of great medical care—and they were rich enough to pay higher taxes AND private insurance premiums. Everyone else got roughly the same medical care; but now the middle class got it for nothing as most of the poor had done before. Nobody lost—not for another fifteen years when the quality of medical care began to decline noticeably. And by then they were hooked. By contrast almost every insured Ameerican is a potential loser under Obamacare. And some of those considered to be winners—i.e., the currently non-insured—will feel like losers if they are forced to insure and then remain inconveniently healthy.

So, for all sorts of reasons, opponents of this bill should not feel deterred from hope of repeal by the British experience. At the very least they have a window of opportunity to reverse the legislation of about eight to ten years. It's doable if you think it's doable—not if not.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

Guys, all this talk about lawsuits has me a bit worried. On the one hand, every liberal and moderate commentator seems to be saying that the suits hold no water and have no legal hope of passing, which is true from a purely technical viewpoint. But I don't see any reason why the Supreme Court wouldn't just choose to step in and overturn HCR for the hell of it. It seems to me that several of the conservative justices hold personal grudges against Obama, so really what would stop them?

Someone talk me down. >:/

Moodles, Monday, 22 March 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

i don't understand why they are so obsessed by the nhs, which is demonstrably unexceptional in terms of costs and outcomes. is it a churchill thing?

caek, Monday, 22 March 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

the same thing that would stop obama from stacking the court

iatee, Monday, 22 March 2010 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

if they had not got used to getting free but inadequate health care.

hmm, are britishes so dissatisfied?

Nobody lost—not for another fifteen years when the quality of medical care began to decline noticeably.

what calamity occurred in the early 1960s?

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

lsd

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

bob dyland didn't play woodstock

Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

what calamity occurred in the early 1960s?

Margaret Thatcher got married.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

hmm, are britishes so dissatisfied?

i think his point is that we are kind of used to a certain level, which is rather low by objective standards, and the absence of a significant private market means we have no idea what we're missing. this is of course a waterfall of bullshit.

caek, Monday, 22 March 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

*they will eliminate the liberal cities of New York and San Francisco

― Mr. Que, Monday, 22 March 2010 20:57 (58 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

have already tried this?

http://www.israelnewsagency.com/cherney911terrorism.jpg

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:58 (fifteen years ago)

also ???????? churchill didn't bring in the nhs?

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)

like jeez if you are going to be listen-to-the-crazy-guy at least pretend to care about facts

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:00 (fifteen years ago)

Didn't Atlee?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:00 (fifteen years ago)

basically yes. these guys are obsessed w/ churchill sam. one was making a zing at their expense.

caek, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:01 (fifteen years ago)

like they have a total hardon for his way with epigrams.

caek, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:02 (fifteen years ago)

(Even a few years ago you could tell this from the appearance of the buildings.) The advance of medical science today makes a repeat of this performance quite impossible.

huh wut you need to build new hospitals to let poor people in? this article is beyond stupid?

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:02 (fifteen years ago)

lol sorry dude didn't notice yr post

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:03 (fifteen years ago)

Churchill had no problem with NHS (an "inevitability," he said at one point; that's the implication my excerpt gets right).

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:03 (fifteen years ago)

He had no problem with it but implying he was responsible is rong.

So glad that with the benefit of hindsight that britishers are starting to look back on Churchill and notice he was batshit crazy and not just impeachable war winning guy.

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:05 (fifteen years ago)

No, I know. I'm just wondering why the NHS keeps getting dragged into it. I don't think anyone anywhere on any side of any debate apart from the one between K-Lo and the rest of them is saying its a good thing for another country to emulate.

caek, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

xp to soto btw

caek, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

and now i leave to brush my teeth and read madame bovary. good luck usa.

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

Rather amazing how Churchill was wrong about almost everything.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:07 (fifteen years ago)

but, god, he could drink and smoke.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:07 (fifteen years ago)

i mean that corner post is not even wrong in its description of history, but my point is how is it even relevant.

"Rationing is implicit in both Obamacare and the NHS." this sentence in particular is doing way more logical heavy lifting than it is capable of.

caek, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:08 (fifteen years ago)

Apparently to the US right it's a bogeyman to invoke, with Soviet bread lines for a GP appointment, and plenty of histrionics from people who don't know what they're talking about just reinforce that 'argument'. It's not. Non-urgent follow-up appointments are sometimes preposterously a ways away from your initial appointment but if you need help fast you generally get it.

My late neighbour in Mpls emigrated to the US because (he claimed) NHS prioritised the establishment of preventative care for all (the present system where you go to a GP that's generally a few blocks away from home and if things are more serious there are referrals etc) over the kind of very complicated research and invention that he was doing during the war. His only other option was to become a Harley Street consultant and there was no challenge in that, plus he hated the idea of being a rich-person doctor, so he joined the University of Minnesota because they gave him a huge grant. TONS of British medical staff came to the US for this reason, but I'm sure many were less charitable about the NHS than my neighbour was.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)

wau rich country able to give away money to supposedly bring in the best instead of helping its poor, never seen that happen in history before

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:13 (fifteen years ago)

can someone explain the thesis of that post

max, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:13 (fifteen years ago)

suzy knew someone

And guess what? I think Pitchfork is going to give it a BM. (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

right, the nhs is not perfect/not terrible, etc. that is just my point. if they wanted to invoke a socialized medicine bogeyman they could find one that was a little scarier than the nhs. i think it's a churchill/sex thing.

caek, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:15 (fifteen years ago)

lol

the thesis of the corner post tho--is it, "the US can still revoke health care despite britain"

max, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:16 (fifteen years ago)

i think the thesis is "Rationing is implicit in both Obamacare and the NHS."

caek, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

the UK instituted universal health care after the war, when everything was shitty for everyone, plus, the "medical system" was basically the vestiges of the victorian noblesse oblige charity care -- the government stole the good things built by the old private sector and gave them out to everyone without building anything new (??). today's britons don't know how bad they actually have it, and so the NHS is politically safe.

most americans have wonderful care with no problems, so now that obama has made us like the UK in the 1950s, people will scream bloody murder and the GOP can repeal the whole thing, if they want to.

xps

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

when you put it like that...

caek, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:19 (fifteen years ago)

the objections to this law seem so wildly off base. if there are logical ones, I'm all for people voicing them, but as has been said repeatedly, republicans have had many many years to offer up a solution and have never done so. They still haven't offered any; it all boils down to tort reform for them, which is something like 1% of the cost problem. It's now impossible to have any kind of logical or reasonable discourse about the issue.

akm, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)

this is why "REPEAL" is not a vote-winning narrative in the election imo.

caek, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:22 (fifteen years ago)

Churchill is the only British PM most brain-dead 50+ Americans can name, and it's only because he's the one that looks like a bulldog from WWII.

Also WTF, am I not allowed to relate someone's experience who happened to be around and working as a doctor when the NHS was founded? Especially since it seemed the POV was being solicited? Dr W. said that before the NHS only people from wealthy families (like him) could study medicine or pursue it as a profession, afterwards, you merely had to have aptitude.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:24 (fifteen years ago)

Churchill is the only British PM most brain-dead 50+ Americans can name, and it's only because he's the one that looks like a bulldog from WWII the insurance adverts.

― ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:24 (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:29 (fifteen years ago)

trolling america this thread is too easy, i should stop and do something productive.

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:30 (fifteen years ago)

you're british: i'm not sure sincerity is in your blood

the artist formerly known as (remy bean), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:31 (fifteen years ago)

(trolling brits is fun too)

the artist formerly known as (remy bean), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:31 (fifteen years ago)

step away from the keyboard before you serve any more of those ice cold zings, sam. you are too real for america.

caek, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:39 (fifteen years ago)

lol

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:40 (fifteen years ago)

http://blogs.nybooks.com/post/466232493/suddenly-a-political-mastermind

goole, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:40 (fifteen years ago)

drinking alone near the internet + stupidity = one of my trademarks :)

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:41 (fifteen years ago)

The most bizarro-world thing about this is - and correct me if I'm wrong - VIRTUALLY NOTHING CHANGES for people who currently have health care. The people most affected, eventually, are those with no or poor health care, so all the antipathy must be coming from people either without health care who don't want it (the "right to illness/bankruptcy" fold, I guess) or people who have it but don't want everyone to have it (the "mine, I worked for this so am making a principled stand and also I am a big asshole" fold). Right? Like, why the apoplexia?

My sister lives in Leeds. My sister-in-law lives in Sydney. And they both love their health care. Other than stepping over all the corpses who died waiting in line to get it. Sigh. I'd suggest a scholarship fund to send all these ignorant naysayers overseas for a visit if I didn't think they'd spend the money on revising textbooks instead.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:41 (fifteen years ago)

The fear as i've seen it is that obamacare will force all private insurers out of business and everybody will be stuck with shitty care and dealing with which will be like Patty & Selma at the DMV.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)

I'm having a real hard time not switching into lecture or pure sarcasm or infodump mode on this, so i'm trying to keep my posts short.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Monday, 22 March 2010 22:57 (fifteen years ago)

i don't know why the NHS gets dragged in either, since it's not an insurance system. most people in britain don't have any form of health insurance. they have a doctor and hospitals that are free of charge. doctors get their paychecks signed by the government. if anything, US HCR has just entrenched ameri-lol firmly in the opposite mentality, i.e. MORE insurance rather than less. which no doubt is a gigantic, gigantic leap forward, i.e. i can actually imagine affording health insurance there now.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:58 (fifteen years ago)

but you know, i really just want to take a moment here to step back, breathe deeply, and say

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA REPUBLICANS LOL

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 22:59 (fifteen years ago)

http://img.slate.com/media/1/123125/123054/2207789/2210335/090225_Pol_BoehnerTN.jpg

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 23:02 (fifteen years ago)

Looks like someone just took a knee to the groin.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 22 March 2010 23:03 (fifteen years ago)

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (666 of them)

LiveJournal (acoleuthic), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:04 (fifteen years ago)

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (667 of them)

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:05 (fifteen years ago)

the other objections I've heard, related to the NHS, is that doctors will not get paid enough by the government system. which I suppose is a logical objection, if you think doctors don't make enough money. I can't seem to actually find any data about what doctors make, and don't have any sense of what is "enough".

akm, Monday, 22 March 2010 23:05 (fifteen years ago)

i mean I gather that some doctors find medicare a pain in their ass that doesn't pay them enough money. this doesn't seem to be any kind of new problem, I remember pretty strongly that my childhood primary care doctor had a huge sign saying he would not accept medicare patients, right next to a big picture of ronald reagan. but I think this reform is supposed to increase those payments.

akm, Monday, 22 March 2010 23:07 (fifteen years ago)

sorry zingfish, just seemed quite apposite

LiveJournal (acoleuthic), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:08 (fifteen years ago)

also ???????? churchill didn't bring in the nhs?

― he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 22 March 2010 16:59 (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

He may not have brought about the NHS but he enabled the postwar labour government to bring it about quickly after they came to power.

The price that labour put on joining the wartime coalition was to be put in charge of domestic policy areas such as industry, health, housing and, above all, postwar reconstruction planning. Churchill allowed Attlee & co. to develop the NHS, social housing, nationalisation etc. so it was all ready to roll once the war ended. Even if he wouldn't have taken it as far had he won in 1945 Churchill saw that the price of victory was ensuring that the british people were better off after the war than they were before, having lived through the industrial and social unrest of the interwar period.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:10 (fifteen years ago)

this doesn't seem to be any kind of new problem, I remember pretty strongly that my childhood primary care doctor had a huge sign saying he would not accept medicare patients, right next to a big picture of ronald reagan.

do you mean medicaid? i never heard of a doctor not accepting medicare; medicare pays. my parents were both in private practice most of my life.

horseshoe, Monday, 22 March 2010 23:10 (fifteen years ago)

Google/BBC says in 2007, if the GP is in a pharmacy practice, they were on avg. paid £128K/yr, if it was a practice with no chemist attached, then £106K.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:11 (fifteen years ago)

It's a strange sight today to see so many media outlets offering simple explanations of what's actually in the bill and how it affects people with insurance, without insurance, etc. That's nice and all, but it sure would've been nice to hear all this, say, over the PAST YEAR OR SO. It's like now that the horse race is over they finally have time to present a fact or two.

the rolling bears (Z S), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:13 (fifteen years ago)

no fucking shit. it's like, we'll just present the looniest demagoguing of this bill that we can and then offer a half-quote rebuttal from someone, and that will form our presentation of these issues for months. then once it's passed we'll explain how it works. christ almighty!

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 23:17 (fifteen years ago)

i mean it really is deeply weird. i thought the exact same thing this morning when i read the ny times online. i was like huh, this is the clearest thing i've read from any news source about the real-world consequences of this bill! and then i turn to the washpo and they've got one too.

Tracer Hand, Monday, 22 March 2010 23:18 (fifteen years ago)

thanks to the nhs i am immortal by the way. you are all immortal now too. it is cool.

caek, Monday, 22 March 2010 23:20 (fifteen years ago)

ezra klein's blog has been the best imo

J0rdan S., Monday, 22 March 2010 23:21 (fifteen years ago)

Ezra Klein isn't on FOX and CNN.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:23 (fifteen years ago)

Media Timeline:
1st - Obama Administration to make health care a top priority
- Republicans aren't happy!
- Dems present an idea or two
- Republicans aren't gonna take this crap
- Dems vow to work together across the aisle
- Some racists are mad!
- Some Republicans agree with the racists!
- Paranoid people are paranoid!
- Dems waiting on Baucus to do something
- Republicans agree that paranoid people should be paranoid
- Many of the people that are racist are also paranoid
- Dems agree to make bill much, much worse so that Lieberman and Snowe and Collins can be on TV a lot
- Dems on verge of passing historic legislation
- ARMAGEDDON IS IMPENDING
- Sen. Brown is president now!
- Republicans take shirt off, have sex in the backyard like it's no big deal, the tide has turned!
- Paranoid weirdos and racists are pretty much the same people, common ancestor identified: Daryl Garvey, b. 1833, Charleston, SC
- Reconciliation ultimate battle, paranoid racists in the public unite with paranoid racists in congress to be paranoid, racist
- HCR passes
Last - Now it's time to tell you what's in the bill and how it affects you

the rolling bears (Z S), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:23 (fifteen years ago)

obama polling below 50% for the first time. hope this turns around. is this health care furor going to go the fuck away in a year? I mean, when it becomes clear that the world is not going to end as a result of it? how long will the republicans be able to pound this as an issue?

akm, Monday, 22 March 2010 23:23 (fifteen years ago)

they'll dry hump it like a pretty ricky couch on youtube

And guess what? I think Pitchfork is going to give it a BM. (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:25 (fifteen years ago)

Don't pay polls any mind until the end of the week.

ned ragú (suzy), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:25 (fifteen years ago)

not for very long -- dems might take hits in elections this year but those will likely be newly blue districts where the new dem rep probably would've lost regardless of what obama did/didn't do -- just the ebb & flow of the congress, the dems weren't going to be able to string this majority out as it stands for more than this anyway

in a year from now, when lots of people will reportedly see some benefits, i can't imagine that this will at all be a net loss for obama in particular, or the dem party -- we will have moved onto something else, and it's likely that the bill will swing dem/obama polling upwards amongst undecideds

the thing to remember is that americans by and large advocate health reform when they know what it is -- when people can digest & understand the bill and can see some benefits for it, it will be at worst a net even for dems

J0rdan S., Monday, 22 March 2010 23:28 (fifteen years ago)

i would like to note that my use of the term "we" there means the USA not the dem party

J0rdan S., Monday, 22 March 2010 23:29 (fifteen years ago)

obama polling below 50% for the first time.

Clinton finished his first year at around 46%. Unlike Republicans, Obama and company realize peaking in your first year (due to an act of terrorism) and then having your approval rating sink to astronomical levels is a *bad* thing. In one year, Obama and company achieve historical reform. All Bush achieved is war's equivalent to Weekend at Bernie's 2.

Where's Mexican Waldo? (Cattle Grind), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:42 (fifteen years ago)

Reagan's approval rating was in the high thirties in '82 -- the kind of statistic the White House has repeatedly cited. Just sayin'.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:43 (fifteen years ago)

well my overall point was that you can't take someone's approval rating in the early stages of their term as any kind of indicator. My dad cites his current approval ratings as if Obama's departure in 2013 is a guarantee.

Where's Mexican Waldo? (Cattle Grind), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:45 (fifteen years ago)

Approval ratings today are sort of the opposite of Bush's 95% love or whatever post 9/11. I'm surprised Obama's not polling worse, though I assume as with several other dips in the past year the numbers will go up once the din dies out, the smoke clears and people realize he did the right thing.

Where does this rightwing love for insurance companies come from, btw? Defending them is a bit like coming to the defense of the guys that boot your car.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 22 March 2010 23:47 (fifteen years ago)

I could be wrong, but the numbers indicate that Obama is Reagan-esque in his Teflon qualities. The public trusts him to execute reform.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:49 (fifteen years ago)

It is quite amazing to see people rush to the defense of an industry that two years ago they were probably criticizing as "inhumane".

I have a lot of experience working with health insurance, and have always been convinced that the current system is set up to confuse the layman that use it to the point hwere they use it incorrectly and screw themselves out of money.

Where's Mexican Waldo? (Cattle Grind), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:51 (fifteen years ago)

yes -- also it is built to prey on the inherent fear involved with serious medical procedures

J0rdan S., Monday, 22 March 2010 23:52 (fifteen years ago)

It just seems like of all the political fights to pick ... the defense of insurance companies? Really? This is the straw(man) that broke the camel's back?

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 22 March 2010 23:53 (fifteen years ago)

Congratulations, Democrats. Beginning now, you own the health-care system in America. Every hiccup. Every complaint. Every long line. All yours.

Besides the obvious effect that most of the impacts of this bill won't be felt until Obama's first term is over, I really get sick of viewpoints like these.

It's pretty interesting that the populace has invented this fictional America where we can just walk into doctor's offices and get seen within 5 minutes and can get referred to and see a specialist the same day and don't currently WAIT WEEKS AT A TIME FOR APPOINTMENTS....

Where's Mexican Waldo? (Cattle Grind), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:54 (fifteen years ago)

Count: Democrats shouldn't expect much cooperation from Republicans the rest of this year, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) warned Monday . . . "There will be no cooperation for the rest of the year," McCain said during an interview Monday on an Arizona radio affiliate. "They have poisoned the well in what they've done and how they've done it."

Pointercount: Reid spokesman Jim Manley released the following statement:

For someone who campaigned on ‘Country First’ and claims to take great pride in bipartisanship, it’s absolutely bizarre for Senator McCain to tell the American people he is going to take his ball and go home until the next election. He must be living in some parallel universe because the fact is, with very few exceptions, we’ve gotten very little cooperation from Senate Republicans in recent years.

Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:57 (fifteen years ago)

Word, Cattle Grind. I generally have to wait at least a week to get an appointment with my GP. I just had abdominal surgery on March 10; I was told to make a followup appt. with the surgeon within 14 days after surgery. I called on the 15th, and the earliest appointment I could get was April 1.

Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 22 March 2010 23:59 (fifteen years ago)

Josh: Agreed. Insurance companies thrive on weaseling out of paying any which way they can.

I had my insurance company two years ago refusing (at one point) to pay a claim for an urgent care I visited. They claimed it was an out of network facility - their website claimed it was not. They claimed it had been out of network for years.

I'm someone who is very educated in understanding health plans (due to my job) and followed every step necessary in the situation above and almost got screwed (they paid it due to my repeated arguments). The average person who may not know much about health insurance usually get confused by the plan designs and when referrals are and aren't necessary and the whole "in/out of network" paradigm. I even suggest to family that they take courses on health plans so they can maximize the usage of it.

Where's Mexican Waldo? (Cattle Grind), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 00:00 (fifteen years ago)

Pancakes: That's what I was saying. Everybody who railed against this bill due to the potential for "longer waits" were making it sound like we have this amazing supermarket of health care where we get in and out as we please now. We ALREADY have long waits. I had to have strings pulled to get my MRI done in a timely fashion.

The revisionism by the right is just maddening.

Where's Mexican Waldo? (Cattle Grind), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 00:03 (fifteen years ago)

there was someone in the community who had complications due to Crohn's who died because he had a rupture in his colon whilst waiting hours in the waiting room for a procedure. they didn't consider him that high of a risk when he was admitted.

I know nothing about medical anything so who knows, he may have died anyway but still...ya know

Where's Mexican Waldo? (Cattle Grind), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 00:07 (fifteen years ago)

WHILST

pose a question that you will answer, but under a different username (velko), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 00:14 (fifteen years ago)

thanks Admiral Dickcheese

Where's Mexican Waldo? (Cattle Grind), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 00:17 (fifteen years ago)

Where does this rightwing love for insurance companies come from, btw? Defending them is a bit like coming to the defense of the guys that boot your car.

it's not about actually caring about insurance companies imo: it's about preventing the Democrats from instituting reform that might result in a whole class of people who benefit from social reforms that are branded "Democrat."

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 00:31 (fifteen years ago)

Lobbyist contributions seem to be equal on both sides of the political spectrum, and industry love is on both sides as well. The insurance lobby, after destroying the public option through a massive bipartisan fear campaign, left the parties with one of two choices. Either leave them alone, or mandate every American buys their product. Whichever party won the battle, they win the war.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 00:36 (fifteen years ago)

i for one think we could solve the problem by demanding the death of all citizens who drive I-Rocs

Where's Mexican Waldo? (Cattle Grind), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 00:38 (fifteen years ago)

i appreciate that we all hate insurance companies and it is a bummer that we didnt shut them all down by fiat through this legislation but...

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 00:51 (fifteen years ago)

I suppose it's nice that the mandate is such a weak one, but boy would I love it if some anti-reform group wasted a ton of energy on a constitutional challenge and only managed to knock away THAT bit

oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 00:58 (fifteen years ago)

max makin sure everybody knows that suggesting there's anything untoward in immense windfalls for insurance companies is yet more wishing for a utopia in which everybody gets a pony

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:05 (fifteen years ago)

oh no thats not really what im saying

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:08 (fifteen years ago)

it is a bummer that we didnt shut them all down by fiat through this legislation

I took this to be sarcasm

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:08 (fifteen years ago)

its sarcasm-that-i-actually-believe but the bit that comes after the "but" is that the bill treats insurance companies pretty harshly and i am kind of sick of the jane hamsher ed show THE INSURANCE COMPANIES WIN AGAIN rhetoric

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:11 (fifteen years ago)

I suppose it's nice that the mandate is such a weak one, but boy would I love it if some anti-reform group wasted a ton of energy on a constitutional challenge and only managed to knock away THAT bit

― oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Monday, March 22, 2010 8:58 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

this would like totally ruin the whole package of legislation tho!

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:11 (fifteen years ago)

its sarcasm-that-i-actually-believe but the bit that comes after the "but" is that the bill treats insurance companies pretty harshly and i am kind of sick of the jane hamsher ed show THE INSURANCE COMPANIES WIN AGAIN rhetoric

they kinda do though! I mean be sick of the rhetoric if you like but they're about to get a fucking insane cash windfall. I'm guessing you'd let me impose all sorts of restrictions on maxcorp if I could get you a comparable payday!

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:12 (fifteen years ago)

well im thinking specifically here of the restriction on their profits (85 cents for every premium dollar goes back to care) which will be fairly limited anyway now that they are required to cover pre-existingly sick ppl. i mean they "win" in the same way that like... con ed "wins" when we all have electricity

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:16 (fifteen years ago)

I'd join maxcorp in a red hot minute if he offered free gin with a colonscopy.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:16 (fifteen years ago)

also you will never restrict maxcorp you fuckin commie

alfred unfortunately u are afflicted w/ the preexisting condition 'being an internet messageboard poster'

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:18 (fifteen years ago)

dude c'mon. they get more paid. much more paid. sure they'd like it better if it were infinitely more paid, but they get more paid. pretending they are anything less than super-stoked about getting way more paid is a little...y'know.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:18 (fifteen years ago)

if i were an insurance exec id stay for another 2 years and then jump ship

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:20 (fifteen years ago)

J0hn, do you really think the Republican long game is that strong? Anti-HCR because potential future Democrats would benefit? Because as lots of folks pointed out last year during the long election season, socio-demo stats are already running firmly in the Dems favor, so it seems odd the Republicans would focus so fervently on this one bit of potential future Dem bolstering legislation, as opposed to trying to undo all the damage it has inflicted on itself over the past several decades (esp. post Southern strategy). Then again, soul searching has never been a particularly strong Republican trait.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:20 (fifteen years ago)

just wait til this plan is IMPROVED after I'm dead

Fusty Moralizer (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:21 (fifteen years ago)

So, Friday, then?

Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:23 (fifteen years ago)

(like for example have a gander over at the left hand side of this story, where it says "related quotes." now imagine you owned huge amounts of preferred stock in amgen or aetna. guess who does own huge amounts of said stock, though? lol, the dudes on the boards of amgen & aetna, who are busting open magnums of '97 cabernet tonight I'd guess.)

J0hn, do you really think the Republican long game is that strong? Anti-HCR because potential future Democrats would benefit?

umm yes 100% I think that - I think if they actually believed the plan would be catastrophic, they'd have sat back and let the Democrats dig their own graves

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:24 (fifteen years ago)

well im thinking specifically here of the restriction on their profits (85 cents for every premium dollar goes back to care)

I was under the impression this is only limited to the exchanges that will be set up, not the companies that are currently around.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:26 (fifteen years ago)

Tristero over on Digby's blog posted today:

Democrats fail to understand that the real fight, the one with no holds barred whatsoever, began exactly one millisecond after the gavel came down. And if history is any judge, they are completely unprepared for what is about to hit them.

Foul epithets? Teabaggers carrying guns to rallies? Members of Congress finding excuses to justify terrorism against government offices? Don't Democrats get it? That's what the rightwing fanatics hellbent on wrecking this country were doing when they were being polite. That's their idea of civility. The gloves have just come off. After all, they got nothing to lose.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:27 (fifteen years ago)

Foul epithets?

The term you are looking for is "racial slur".

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:31 (fifteen years ago)

Republicans: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpWQfPreH_4

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:36 (fifteen years ago)

"When you got nothin' you got nothin' to lose"
- Bob Dylan

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 01:56 (fifteen years ago)

Adam the "companies that are currently around" are going to be the ones selling insurance on the exchanges.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:01 (fifteen years ago)

Nice! The more I read about this bill the more I like it. Wish the news reported this shit.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:08 (fifteen years ago)

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/billsvstrills.jpg

fun lil chart

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:24 (fifteen years ago)

dude c'mon. they get more paid. much more paid. sure they'd like it better if it were infinitely more paid, but they get more paid. pretending they are anything less than super-stoked about getting way more paid is a little...y'know.

― the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, March 22, 2010 8:18 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark

i don't really get this sentiment -- i guess i agree with max in that i don't mind if a company profits if the service they provide is reasonable and fair? i mean, obv that remains to be seen, but by every account, one of the goals of realistic health reform (even one that includes a public option) is to force health insurance companies to profit in more consumer-friendly and efficient ways? and this bill does that from what i can tell? and leaves the door open for more of that? i don't see how insurance companies have come out in a net equal or net positive manner?

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:37 (fifteen years ago)

its sarcasm-that-i-actually-believe but the bit that comes after the "but" is that the bill treats insurance companies pretty harshly and i am kind of sick of the jane hamsher ed show THE INSURANCE COMPANIES WIN AGAIN rhetoric

― max, Monday, March 22, 2010 9:11 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah im w/maxy on this one - if you look a how the insurance industry reacted the the bill, their opinion of it seemed somewhat ambiguous - from the looks of it they were trying to kill the bill w/o pissing off the dems too much - especially toward the end where it looked like it might actually die they dumped a ton of money into negative ads - at other points they held their fire and tastily supported it - at no point did they throw their weight behind the bill in any sort of super psyched manner

i think they wouldve rather seen it die and be left in their prime position of being able to cover just the healthy and not have to deal w/any sort of new regulation and scrutiny - on the other hand they recognized that it could be a lot worse, like medicare for all worse which would put them out of biz - and im sure theyre cautiously optimistic abt all the revenue that the newly ensured will bring - but of course more revenue doesnt necessarily equal more profit - they are super unpsyched abt have to insure sick people for a reasonable rate

so this is def not some lol hueg win windfall for the industry - its more of a big question mark - they were 100% fine w/the status quo - now no one is sure exactly how itll play out or what legislation is coming next

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:39 (fifteen years ago)

short version for john - more revenue doesnt necessarily equal more profit

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:39 (fifteen years ago)

I do get the feeling that no one is sure at all if this will hurt or help insurance industry profits.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:41 (fifteen years ago)

short version for john - more revenue doesnt necessarily equal more profit

having worked in health care from '88-'04 I am aware of this thx so much -- will also contend that more revenue is going to equal more profit here & that ins. cos. are v. v. v. excited for revenue influx - really, distinguishing between revenues & profits here is splitting hairs, as there are any number of ways to wring secondary profits from revenues even if you don't get to hang onto the incoming revenues for longer than 30 days

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:45 (fifteen years ago)

(in re: why they play both ends of the field on supporting/opposing the bill - I don't actually have to do that math right? it's so that whoever wins is yr bud)

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:46 (fifteen years ago)

what's to stop them from just raising premiums across the board tho, given that there's no gov't competition?

k3vin k., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:47 (fifteen years ago)

(sorry to be dense)

k3vin k., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:48 (fifteen years ago)

For one thing, it's solidifying certain insurers will be in these exchanges from the ground up. For another, they've virtually solidified their status as Too Big To Fail corporations. They've already got one hand in the pocket with the mandate.

All that money spent into lobbying against the public option can be put to use lawyering their way through loopholes in this bill, and screwing the American taxpayer like so many for-profit companies have done recently. I bet there are plenty such people - amoral math wizards - who are looking for secure jobs since their chosen field of finances is having a rough time.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:50 (fifteen years ago)

cards on the table, I hate the insurance companies with an abiding passion & would begrudge them all their profits, & if you'd ever seen a suicidal patient discharged to care of self because insurance wouldn't cover them & the law won't let you hold somebody who's not clear-and-present, and then seen that a whole bunch more times, you might be less "service they provide is meaningful & fair about it" - these people hold the power of life & death over those who rely on them & have been known, many many many times, to put their bottom line first

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:50 (fifteen years ago)

im totally with u, kill the fuckers forever w/medicare 4 all as far as im concerned

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:52 (fifteen years ago)

kwv, i think the idea is that by making the health care market more open & competitive in the "exchanges", that companies that try & jack up premiums will lose customers to other companies that have more reasonable premiums

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:53 (fifteen years ago)

er, kev*

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:54 (fifteen years ago)

cards on the table, I hate the insurance companies with an abiding passion & would begrudge them all their profits, & if you'd ever seen a suicidal patient discharged to care of self because insurance wouldn't cover them & the law won't let you hold somebody who's not clear-and-present, and then seen that a whole bunch more times, you might be less "service they provide is meaningful & fair about it" - these people hold the power of life & death over those who rely on them & have been known, many many many times, to put their bottom line first

― the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, March 22, 2010 9:50 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah no, i know & i agree

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:55 (fifteen years ago)

it's just, idk, we're gonna get into this thing where like i say you're being unreasonable and you say i'm placating and w/e

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:57 (fifteen years ago)

what's to stop them from just raising premiums across the board tho, given that there's no gov't competition?

― k3vin k., Monday, March 22, 2010 10:47 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

kwv, i think the idea is that by making the health care market more open & competitive in the "exchanges", that companies that try & jack up premiums will lose customers to other companies that have more reasonable premiums

― J0rdan S., Monday, March 22, 2010 10:53 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah and also theres regulators who can kick insurers out of the exchanges if they jack up prices for no good reason - im somewhat skeptical of this as it relies on regulators to like to their jobs - but at least you know people are thinking abt this problem

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:58 (fifteen years ago)

I dunno if it'd get there J but I think the idea that a massive revenue influx is somehow a mixed bag for dudes who are long practiced in making the #s skew their direction is taking the glass-half-full/wait-and-see approach into Pollyanna territory

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 02:59 (fifteen years ago)

yeah the regulators thing is... fishy, seeing as what has happened with i.e. financial regulators -- we'll have to see who they hire and if there's any sort of pipeline developed from private -> public like there was in the financial sector

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:00 (fifteen years ago)

im somewhat skeptical of this as it relies on regulators to like to their jobs

^^^

but at least you know people are thinking abt this problem

man I'm callin you the next time I need comforted when there is no comfort to be found anywhere

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:00 (fifteen years ago)

If it's anything like the financial sector we are utterly f-ed.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:00 (fifteen years ago)

well i assume they'll never let it get like that, but really, who knows

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:03 (fifteen years ago)

Reading this fantastic bio the question came up at the turn of the century: break "combinations," regulate them, or work with them? Even with the creation of the FTC, the Fed, and, later, the SEC I'm not sure even Brandeis' solutions solved the problem. When so many circles of capital (Wall Street, insurance) interlock with Washington, the best we can do, it seems, is to squeeze something out of these combinations for us, as long as the big boys can show a profit to stockholders.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:04 (fifteen years ago)

xpost why would you assume that though I guess is my question - like, on spiritual grounds? because it seems to me like the dickheads like me who assume shit will go foul in a hurry kinda have past performance on our sides

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:06 (fifteen years ago)

short version for john - more revenue doesnt necessarily equal more profit

having worked in health care from '88-'04 I am aware of this thx so much -- will also contend that more revenue is going to equal more profit here & that ins. cos. are v. v. v. excited for revenue influx - really, distinguishing between revenues & profits here is splitting hairs, as there are any number of ways to wring secondary profits from revenues even if you don't get to hang onto the incoming revenues for longer than 30 days

― the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, March 22, 2010 10:45 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

if insurers really were super stoked abt this we wouldve seen it in their actions - and likely in some republican votes for this thing - theres def a serious possibility this will be better for their bottom line - but i suspect theyre v nervous abt a slippery slope scenario where once government is in their business it wont stop fucking around - like if it does end up a windfall and voters are freaking out over paying so much it wont be vary hard for congress to put together a lil bill that says they get less you know - its not a big lift like passing comprehensive reform - its jus a lil tweak to give some $$ back to yr average amercian

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:07 (fifteen years ago)

but really, who knows

pretty much my feeling about this whole deal, lot of the number crunching seems awfully optimistic

this is the part where he pretends not to know how to post a photo/video (velko), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:08 (fifteen years ago)

x-post Yeah, but like the financial sector, it's not like anybody dies if ... oh, wait.

The question, I guess, is how much this bill will staunch or otherwise slow that shit-go-foul hurry. Or at least buy enough time for folks to regroup at start filling gaps and fixing holes in it.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:09 (fifteen years ago)

but i suspect theyre v nervous abt a slippery slope scenario where once government is in their business it wont stop fucking around

yeah imo suckin govt teat is the dream of every corporation. halliburton wasn't exactly "oh no, gov. is in our business" about going to Iraq. their position was "you know who has, like, a LOT of money? the government! cigars for everybody!" and that is where the ins. cos. heads are at I would say. did you have a look at their stock tickers today?

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:10 (fifteen years ago)

yeah imo suckin govt teat is the dream of every corporation.

Absolutely. I'm waiting for an Alan Grayson type to have fun with this on the campaign trail.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:11 (fifteen years ago)

xpost why would you assume that though I guess is my question - like, on spiritual grounds? because it seems to me like the dickheads like me who assume shit will go foul in a hurry kinda have past performance on our sides

― the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, March 22, 2010 10:06 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

well, financial regulation is by far the worst regulatory body in the US -- there are other sectors of business that are regulated in a manner that is by no means perfect but is certainly operable and helps provide some benefits to the consumer (i.e. food)

i agree with the idea that corporations are aaaalways going to be ahead of govt regulation -- they will always find ways to slither around & pretty much rely on the public's general apathy/stupidity

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:12 (fifteen years ago)

well the government never made any attempt to regulate halliburton - this bill contains a lot not to like for insurers - and def a lot to like - im not unsympathetic to yr argument john - it just doesnt from my pov explain how the industry played this whole process

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:13 (fifteen years ago)

i think the question of whether the insurance assholes win or lose is theoretically interesting, from a word-problem standpoint, but there's no question they didn't want this bill or anything at all to upset their sweet lil scam deal. it's not that the bill exactly dislodges them from their parasitic perch, but it just sort of complicates everything and why mess with a cash cow like they had going? but the bigger issue to me is what it means in the long term about how people think about health care. if ultimately it becomes less of a magic power granted or ungranted by your beneficent boss and more of just something you assume you will have regardless of personal circumstance, then that will be a huge change for americans and basically a step away from nu-feudalism. that's worth a lot, no matter how compromised.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:14 (fifteen years ago)

exactly! that's nicely put.

horseshoe, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:19 (fifteen years ago)

Come on guys, health insurance lobby money was split evenly among democrats and republicans. Money doesn't lie.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:20 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i have to agree w/max n jordan that whether or not our bastard insurers get rich off this shit is somewhat beside the point - sick people getting access, poor people getting subsidies - everyone getting access to bargaining powers of big employers so they can do shit like starting a business or taking time off w/breaking the bank are all important and good and will create secondary effects thatll have positive vibes for our country as a whole

still want medicare for all tho, or as long as im dreaming the v.a. system for all

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:21 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i have to agree w/max n jordan that whether or not our bastard insurers get rich off this shit is somewhat beside the point

No one here's argued to the contrary!

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:22 (fifteen years ago)

ok i jus thought we were getting a little carried away and that u all needed me to show the big picture - look up look around this is the big picture ok see

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:23 (fifteen years ago)

Originally I protested this from the left, until one of my dearest buds yesterday afternoon, after hearing about the House vote, said plainly, "So does that mean I can get insurance again?" His insurance company dumped him three years ago when he was diagnosed with diabetes. Every time I turned on the TV and watched a bit of the voting I thought of him. I'm not one for cheap sentiment but it killed me. Now I think what happened yesterday is one of the unequivocally great first steps I've seen in years; I almost want to get all Michelle Obama: for the first time in my life I'm proud of my country, etc.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:25 (fifteen years ago)

that's not cheap sentiment!

horseshoe, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:27 (fifteen years ago)

Seriously, like someone else noted above: all those handy guides to "what this bill does" that appeared in various papers of record? Where were those itemized lists weeks ago while the Republicans and other opposition groups were going nuts with the distortions and exaggerations? When I actually looked at the paper this morning and saw one of those lists, it made me feel very happy for the not insignificant numbers of folks whose lives will be made better (or at least easier) by this bill. And the next time the HCR issue comes around, I'll be there once again to support its (what seems to me) inevitable expansion.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:32 (fifteen years ago)

yeah the fact that its just accepted that the press doesnt do policy is really so insane

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:35 (fifteen years ago)

I had a moment like Alfred's except it was schadenfreude over watching Boehner melt down on live TV

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:36 (fifteen years ago)

well, i think it's possible that a lot of papers of record shied away from "this is what could be in the bill" or "this is what is being proposed now" or "this is what the senate has passed, but the house will make changes" and waited until the thing was actually passed by both houses until they did a breakdown of such (i know the other bill still has to be passed by the senate but w/e)

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:36 (fifteen years ago)

and, obv it's not the same, but i can guarantee that a lot of papers of record had such information posted on blogs on their websites -- not the same thing i know, but lol 2010 you know?

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:37 (fifteen years ago)

no its that theyd rather be all he said the hcr bill will cause the earths core to rotate in the opposite direction and boil the ocean BUUT he said no it will not cause the earths core to rotate in the opposite direction and boil the ocean

its an established procedure

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:40 (fifteen years ago)

and the u know a lil analysis abt who won the day

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:40 (fifteen years ago)

Last night's debates were funny with all the Republicans coming up and spouting criticisms from a year ago about things that aren't even in the bill anymore.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:41 (fifteen years ago)

I was kinda hoping for a Scanners moment a few times.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:42 (fifteen years ago)

no its that theyd rather be all he said the hcr bill will cause the earths core to rotate in the opposite direction and boil the ocean BUUT he said no it will not cause the earths core to rotate in the opposite direction and boil the ocean

its an established procedure

― ice cr?m, Monday, March 22, 2010 10:40 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark

obviously it's a mix of both, i think

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:42 (fifteen years ago)

a mix of boiling the ocean and not boiling the ocean - that doesn't even make any sense

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:47 (fifteen years ago)

btw hadnt seen this til now

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gFC3kVZTCk

lol

HAVE YOU READ THE BILL

YEEESSSSSS

NO YOU HAVENT

YAAAHHHHHH

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:48 (fifteen years ago)

the little bubbles are gathering at the bottom of the ocean

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:48 (fifteen years ago)

dude the ocean is either boiling or not ok, dont be sucj a fucking boiling relativist

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:49 (fifteen years ago)

George Packer on the Healthcare passage: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/georgepacker/2010/03/not-radical-but-major.html

I especially like this last bit, "Health-care reform, if it does what its supporters claim, will humanize a system in which the vast majority of Americans feel trapped. It will redress social and economic, not racial, injustices. Its breadth and potential effect will resemble those of Social Security and Medicare far more than civil rights—programs that became prime instances of popular activist government and tied substantial segments of the electorate to the Democratic Party for decades.

This prospect might help to explain the fury of House Republicans last night."

Mordy, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 03:54 (fifteen years ago)

hay guyz do u think albinoz r white people or r they there own race

Where's Mexican Waldo? (Cattle Grind), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 04:17 (fifteen years ago)

Keepin' on the cause.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poor_People's_Campaign

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 04:43 (fifteen years ago)

a lot of people in our local community here are talking about being angry at not having a choice to buy insurance. I kind of find that fickle as you technically can't "choose" not to have car insurance either without paying a fine if you're caught not having it.

The argument is that not having car insurance means you cost someone else money in an accident, but the same is sort of true with health insurance, albeit indirectly. Uninsured patients cause health care costs to increase across the board, including for those who do have it.

Besides, absolute freedom doesn't exist, and people that think it does are stupid.

Where's Mexican Waldo? (Cattle Grind), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 04:50 (fifteen years ago)

The argument is that not having car insurance means you cost someone else money in an accident, but the same is sort of true with health insurance, albeit indirectly. Uninsured patients cause health care costs to increase across the board, including for those who do have it.

Yeah dunno why this is so hard for some folks to comprehend other than that they just plain refuse to comprehend it.

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 04:57 (fifteen years ago)

I'm sure the cries of "nanny state" and "move to russia, commies" will only grow louder in the next year.

Where's Mexican Waldo? (Cattle Grind), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 05:00 (fifteen years ago)

The thing is, when even red state Real White Americans benefit from this bill, it will be hard to criticize something if it means them losing that benefit. No doubt many in this crowd will be hypocritical and complain while they use it, but the good things in this bill are tangible, the bad things more or less abstract and philosophical.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 05:36 (fifteen years ago)

or imaginary

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 05:37 (fifteen years ago)

ppl are already compelled to pay taxes or the cops come and throw them in jail. frightening stuff.

yet ppl who aren't rich as fuck seem to be ok with paying for services, transport, hospitals, having an army, even fucking space travel.

harshbuzz to my chilt-on (zvookster), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 06:04 (fifteen years ago)

George Packer on the Healthcare passage: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/georgepacker/2010/03/not-radical-but-major.html

I especially like this last bit, "Health-care reform, if it does what its supporters claim, will humanize a system in which the vast majority of Americans feel trapped. It will redress social and economic, not racial, injustices. Its breadth and potential effect will resemble those of Social Security and Medicare far more than civil rights—programs that became prime instances of popular activist government and tied substantial segments of the electorate to the Democratic Party for decades.

This prospect might help to explain the fury of House Republicans last night."

sayin'

it's not about actually caring about insurance companies imo: it's about preventing the Democrats from instituting reform that might result in a whole class of people who benefit from social reforms that are branded "Democrat."

― the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Monday, March 22, 2010 8:31 PM (Yesterday)

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 12:00 (fifteen years ago)

something that didn't quite click until i read it yesterday:

most states provide zero medicaid if you have no children. zero. even if you are literally broke.

other states, even if you have a family of four, require you to make LESS THAN TWENTY FIVE PERCENT OF THE FEDERAL POVERTY LEVEL to qualify.

this bill guarantees medicaid to everyone, in all 50 states, who makes less than 134% of the federal poverty level. the change, just in that one provision, is fucking mindblowing.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 12:05 (fifteen years ago)

The press is still breathtakingly passive. This morning Robin Roberts allowed Tim Pawlenty to claim that this bill will allow "European-style government-run health care."

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 12:32 (fifteen years ago)

this bill guarantees medicaid to everyone, in all 50 states, who makes less than 134% of the federal poverty level. the change, just in that one provision, is fucking mindblowing.

― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, March 23, 2010 8:05 AM (43 minutes ago)

where'd you read this?

k3vin k., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 12:51 (fifteen years ago)

http://i40.tinypic.com/2i1gjyp.jpg

lawl

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:20 (fifteen years ago)

his expresion

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:22 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i just said that

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

oh wow

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

woooww

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:24 (fifteen years ago)

We are a nation of long-distance runners?

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:25 (fifteen years ago)

he means hawaii

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:26 (fifteen years ago)

boston marathon, frickin heartbreak hill mush

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:26 (fifteen years ago)

Fineman is one of the biggest dickbags in the Village.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)

it takes a nation of long distance runners to haul us back (turn us black?)

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:45 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/03/22/us.acorn.closing/index.html?hpt=T2

this is fucking infuriating

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:47 (fifteen years ago)

Yes, but once again, a passive press fails to note that those conservative "operatives" misidentified themselves.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:49 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, the open contempt of Republicans for an organization that wanted to help poor people in their own neighborhoods, and their inevitable glee in this news...sucks.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:50 (fifteen years ago)

i've never understood why HUD stopped their grants. it's run by a Democrat. Congress is controlled by Democrats. ACORN has done great work for decades and generally registers Democratic voters.. WTF.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 13:54 (fifteen years ago)

man, APPLAUD YOU CORPSES is the greatest username of all time. just sayin.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:01 (fifteen years ago)

The press is still breathtakingly passive. This morning Robin Roberts allowed Tim Pawlenty to claim that this bill will allow "European-style government-run health care."

― APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, March 23, 2010 7:32 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark

pawlenty is so fucking pathetic. he desperately wants on the wingnut gravy train but just can't make it work. the latest fad is to get your AG to launch lawsuits against the new act. so he sends a formal letter to the MNAG asking her to look at the issue. the MNAG is this woman: http://www.ag.state.mn.us/ she said she has to give it a formal review before commenting. haha.

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:04 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.proskauer.com/files/uploads/report2.pdf

The serious management challenges detailed in our report are the fault of ACORN's founder and a cadre of leaders who, in their drive for growth, failed to commit the organization to the basic, appropriate standards of governance and accountability. As a result, ACORN not only fell short of living its principles but also left itself vulnerable to public embarrassment. This hidden camera controversy is an apt example.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:08 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, I'd wager there are a fair # of right-leaning faith-based orgs getting plenty funding that wouldn't survive similar commando tactics if there were nihilist lefties looking to take scalps

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:16 (fifteen years ago)

WELL?

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:17 (fifteen years ago)

here's your chance at attaining immortality, J0hn.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:17 (fifteen years ago)

When arrested, you can ask Dennis Perrin to donate some funny lines for your speech on the capitol steps.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:18 (fifteen years ago)

via Balloon Juice:

Both DougJ and I have been posting on the brick throwing in Rochester, where Congresswoman Louise Slaughter’s office and the local Democratic headquarters had windows broken. Here’s the note that was attached to the brick that went through the Democrats’ window.

http://www.balloon-juice.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/exremism.jpg

Now local TV station 13-WHAM reports that Slaughter received a death threat: “Assassinate is the word they used…toward the children of lawmakers who voted yes.”

The morans who threw the brick are responding to posts on a teabagger blog called “Sipsey Street Irregulars”. The guy who runs the blog is on Social Security disability, of course, and he’s really a peacemaker:

"Now I did not call for the vandalization of the windows of congresscritters, only local Demoncrat party HQs. But I can certainly understand why someone would.
I am trying to prevent civil war and communal killing, not start it, by warning those who do not understand the unintended consequences of THEIR actions."

Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:20 (fifteen years ago)

EXREMISM

ned ragú (suzy), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:21 (fifteen years ago)

On the plus side brick-thrower has helped us solve the Zodiac murders:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_HZxjZs9ytRU/RtbneifXhVI/AAAAAAAACmk/yVSWREyrRHE/s400/zodiac%2Bbutton%2Bnote.gif

Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:22 (fifteen years ago)

I am actively working on the issue of CPCs in NC, actually. But hidden-camera/doctored footage/lol-I-set-you-up crap is not kosher imo so you won't be seeing me showing up at a CPC dressed as a pregnant woman. I am as broken-up about that as you are.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:22 (fifteen years ago)

my day working at the CPC will certainly be the duller for it

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:25 (fifteen years ago)

okay so I am totally in favor of starting a fund to make John dress up as a pregnant woman

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:28 (fifteen years ago)

as a lolbrit, what's a CPC? I like to follow these threads even though your country appears to be quite mad.

tomofthenest, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:28 (fifteen years ago)

Climate Prediction Center

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:29 (fifteen years ago)

(non-lol answer: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crisis_pregnancy_center)

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:30 (fifteen years ago)

sounds like a good way to revive Candid Camera w/ Olbermann as host

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:30 (fifteen years ago)

or Punk'd w/ Matt Taibbi

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:31 (fifteen years ago)

"Crisis Pregnancy Centers." They advertise as offering "abortion alternatives," and their goal is to get women who are considering abortions into their offices so they can try to talk them out of it. They give all sorts of misinformation ("did you know that your likelihood of suicide rises if you have this abortion?") ; really underhanded horrible stuff. Their offices are stocked with playpens & kids toys, all kinds of "baby! baby! you have a baby!" stuff.

Between 2001-2006, they received over sixty million dollars in federal funding.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:32 (fifteen years ago)

brb, starting a "CPC" (only instead of talking women out of having abortions, I will talk them into playing WipeoutHD and WoW)

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:33 (fifteen years ago)

"Counselor Hi Dere, I'm Pregnant."
"Well, let's zeppelin over to the Eastern Kingdoms and think this through."

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:36 (fifteen years ago)

Their offices are stocked with playpens & kids toys, all kinds of "baby! baby! you have a baby!" stuff.

ugh, it wasn't a cpc but I've been in a place like this -- the physchologist's office where my crazy catholic momma sent me after i came out! the atmospheric guilt and shame in a place like that is totally suffocating, which is sadly why i can understand how they work.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:44 (fifteen years ago)

Ha, when I worked for PP, some coworkers and I once took + preg test urine to the CPC down the road just to fuck with them.

kate78, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)

did you, like, throw it on them or something, because otherwise I feel like this story will end unsatisfactorily

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:49 (fifteen years ago)

I have a cousin who would be game to covertly film a CPC, apparently there is a large one in St Paul around Macalester or Highland and she cusses every time she drives by it. However, she would have to take the car without the Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish bumper stickers that day.

ned ragú (suzy), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:50 (fifteen years ago)

"Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish"

A++++ law firm name

Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 14:56 (fifteen years ago)

We'd pretend we were pregnant ladies in distress, listen to their whole deal, and then say, "nawww, I think I'm gonna go have an abortion anyway." The PP affiliate I was with was trying to bring a lawsuit against them, but they had difficulty finding a pregnant women who be willing to be listed as plaintiff.

kate78, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)

I am actively working on the issue of CPCs in NC, actually. But hidden-camera/doctored footage/lol-I-set-you-up crap is not kosher imo so you won't be seeing me showing up at a CPC dressed as a pregnant woman. I am as broken-up about that as you are.

― the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, March 23, 2010 10:22 AM (34 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

:(

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.whitehouse.gov/live

btw who's watching this bill-signing

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:21 (fifteen years ago)

I just put it on a minute ago, has he signed yet? Was supposed to begin at 11.15

ned ragú (suzy), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

Woah who's the fox Blitzer's talking to on CNN?

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

So no republicans are in the room during this. Presumably they are all off eating ice cream and crying into American flag tissues.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)

joe biden to obama re applause: u deserve it man, u deserve it

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

His name's Wolf, not Fox.

jam master (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

LOL he's Obama's hype.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

democrats feelin themselves this morn

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

i've never understood why HUD stopped their grants. it's run by a Democrat. Congress is controlled by Democrats. ACORN has done great work for decades and generally registers Democratic voters.. WTF.

― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, March 23, 2010 8:54 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark

well, the specific de-funding of ACORN was ruled to be illegal by a circuit court judge iirc & the administration actually did repeal the law that had been passed against them, but i guess they feel like their name has been sufficiently stained because of this whole thing -- i think a lot of the ACORN offices are reforming under different names

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

blah blah stop cheerleading and sign it

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

yeah there will just be some rebranding, like when Blackwater became xE

xp

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:49 (fifteen years ago)

I think once the benefits start kicking in Republicans will have a difficult time. All this "Will this hurt democrats?" talk is the media caught up in the last parts of the right wing narrative. Give them a week or two to get it out of their system.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:49 (fifteen years ago)

so does this bill actually do anything to control premium rates? because they keep talking like it will.

akm, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

how is Biden managing to clap sternly while smiling

amazing

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)

also is Obama's right hand a ladyhand?

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)

daria that's... so sad

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

Biden and Obama both wearing blue bracelets on right hand, what for?

ned ragú (suzy), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:54 (fifteen years ago)

solidaridy

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

its their bff bracelets

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

Apparently yeah it will control premiums in the exchanges. Or at least give the middle class and poor some tax breaks and subsidies to make health care cost less.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

so sad abt obamas faild presidency rite now guys

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

this is just like jimmy carter all over again, go grow peanuts barack!

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

someone explain this signing ritual

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

oh I see, everybody gets a pen

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

Oprah did this better, I think

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:58 (fifteen years ago)

Awww Harry Reid dyed his hair for the occasion.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

http://themagicrainbow.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/barack-obama-pointing-250x200.jpg
YOO GET A PEN AND YOOOO GET A PEN AND YOOO GET A PEN!!!!

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

omg dan xp

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

why oh why does Patrick Kennedy have trumphair

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

just logged in, now they are in the hugging part i guess?

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

xp: lol awesome mindmeld there

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

haha

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

anna kendrick is dressed like a soldier for this? bill signings are pretty weird

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

and yes, this is the integral "hug-it-out" portion of the ratification process

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

LOL Fox News flipping out because Joe Biden said to O "This is a big fucking deal."

Ain't it tho?

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:02 (fifteen years ago)

Apparently yeah it will control premiums in the exchanges. Or at least give the middle class and poor some tax breaks and subsidies to make health care cost less.

Nobody knows if it will control premiums in the exchanges. The exchanges aren't set to open up for business for what, another 3-4 years anyway right?

Obama is the new Jesus. He is giving me some healthcare! (Dandy Don Weiner), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:02 (fifteen years ago)

exchanges open in 90 days

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: "This is a big fucking deal"

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

<3 biden

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

Did he say BFD?

I am a sucker for when they bring out the tiny little kid like that, not such a sucker for Biden waiting like two mins to figure out there's a little kid behind him, LOL

ned ragú (suzy), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

(unless I'm confusing those with the "pools" for people with pre-existing conditions and no insurance)

xp

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

wait, Cancer Boy is at the signing?

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

oh hell yeah

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

aw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lu9wkm82FUw

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

seems the source of that is: foxnewsradio twittering: MAC says as VP Biden was introducing President Obama before bill signing, was hearing saying into Obama's ear "this is a big f**king deal."

MAC? no idea

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

can't believe that faggot babykiller would swear. the Dems are so depraved

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

(sorry)

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

but seriously Biden should go fuck himself amirite

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

huh?

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

ha wonder what kucinich just said there

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

johnboehner With the stroke of a pen, President Obama has signed away another share of Americans' freedom. We will take it back. #gopcodered #hellno
13 minutes ago via TweetDeck

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: "This is a big fucking deal"

This HAS to be the thread title now, yeah?

ps, as a small business owner whose wife is on Medicare, WOOO HOOO! Choke on my dick, Boehner!

Religious Embolism (WmC), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

(in case it wasn't clear I was quoting several instances of Republicans' public use of foul language - the last one being Dick Cheney on the floor of the Senate)

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:12 (fifteen years ago)

Nobody knows if it will control premiums in the exchanges. The exchanges aren't set to open up for business for what, another 3-4 years anyway right?

Price rises in an exchange have to be justified to that exchange's regulators. And insurers who raise their prices "excessively" can be barred from an exchange. No idea how this will work out in practice, but it's in the bill.

This doesn't apply to employer plans, obviously. But if your employer-based insurance gets jacked up to 9.5% of your income, you can opt in to the exchange.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:24 (fifteen years ago)

MAC says as VP Biden was introducing President Obama before bill signing, was hearing saying into Obama's ear "this is a big f**king deal."

Obama should've replied, "Big time."

jam master (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

so sad abt obamas faild presidency rite now guys

lol spin addict. Everything is gingerbread men and special brownies, eh joe?

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

exchanges don't open in 90 days, only some kind of high risk pool (which I guess is a limited exchange). I think the specifics of this maybe haven't really been worked out yet. glad I don't work for...whoever it is that is going to have to work around the clock for the next three months figuring it out.

akm, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

MY GOD, I'M BREATHING IN ALL THE CHANGE, SALVATION HAS COME!

xp

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

no wonder you're pissed off about this plan--you're a doctor. you work for Obama now.

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

Meanwhile, over at the GOP press conference:

http://images2.dailykos.com/images/user/3/GOP_On_Signing_Day.jpg

ned ragú (suzy), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

Morbscare is great because they show awesome movies in the waiting room unless you show up on Spielberg day in which case forget it

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

Altair IV is beyond the reach of insurance-company boondoggles, Que

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

All this "Will this hurt democrats?" talk is the media caught up in the last parts of the right wing narrative. Give them a week or two to get it out of their system.

I had to laugh when I saw that the very first analysis out of the gate yesterday for the NY Times was

Big Win for Obama, but at What Cost?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

OK, Biden's outburst was pretty cool. since i've never been a fan of the guy, i think that that says something.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

J0hnny, I have A.I. all racked up for your next visit.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

iirc the feds are allowed to regulate altair IV under the 10th amendment

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

no wonder you're pissed off about this plan--you're a doctor. you work for Obama now.

― Mr. Que, Tuesday, March 23, 2010 4:33 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

lol

And guess what? I think Pitchfork is going to give it a BM. (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:39 (fifteen years ago)

J0hnny, I have A.I. all racked up for your next visit.

preventative medicine for sure!

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

Big Win For Obama, but at What Cost?

Democracy in Iraq: Big Win For Bush, but at What Cost?

I turn it up when I hear the banjo (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:45 (fifteen years ago)

Bam is personally closing Guantanamo tomorrow and performing three gay marriages

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

Yanks Again Series Champs: But at What Cost?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

Sauron Vanquished: But at What Cost?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

guys, this is more like signing a free agent (maybe Carl Pavano) than winning the World Series

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

it's better than nothing

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

^yes, Dem slogan forever

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

the democratic party: you got a better idea*?

*please note, your "ideas" must be "realistic" within the current system that we have, thanks for playing.

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

guys, this is more like signing a free agent (maybe Carl Pavano) than winning the World Series

― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, March 23, 2010 12:48 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

I'd say it's more like getting Buhner for Phelps but y'know...

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

Rahmbo: Too lazy to redefine realism

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

i was thinking of 1989 herschell walker to the vikings for a zillion draft picks, but i guess buhner for phelps can work as well.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

the democratic party: not as good as atomizer, so don't get your hopes up, cheese

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

Sauron Vanquished: But at What Cost?

― Tracer Hand, 23 March 2010 16:47 (5 minutes ago) Bookmark

shitty fuckin movies that's what cost

DarraghmacKwacz (darraghmac), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

http://s.bebo.com/app-image/7926096812/5411656627/PROFILE/i.quizzaz.com/img/q/u/08/04/11/Not_Waving_But_Drowning.jpg

morbs, drowning in a flood of ilx positivity

iatee, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:55 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asO97gdn2oo

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

PressSec Robert Gibbs (EOP)
And yes Mr. Vice President, you're right...
8 minutes ago via web

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

Death Comet Heroically Averted, but at What Cost?

WASHINGTON — The armies of the world united yesterday in an unprecedented display of cooperation that nudged a giant, flaming comet the crucial few degrees necessary to ensure that its trajectory missed the planet Earth and spared billions of lives.

After the bitterest of debates, the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States committed to a leadership role in firing on the 8 million ton behemoth. Skeptics had begun to wonder if they had the courage. But they showed that when the US Army was finally committed to throwing all its political capital onto the table, it could indeed fire its rockets, even its very largest ones.

But as the calls grow for investigation into whether the comet should have been destroyed, rather than simply deflected, or whether the United States is now seen as too compliant on the international stage, skeptics ask: is this a historic achievement, or political suicide? Or both?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha perfect, Tracer.

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 16:59 (fifteen years ago)

A tea party organizer angry over Rep. Thomas Perriello’s (D-Va.) vote in favor of health care reform published what he thought was the freshman member’s home address on a blog, in case any readers “want to drop by” and provide a “personal touch” to their views.

Rather than giving out Perriello’s address however, the tea party activist mistakenly printed the home address of the congressman’s brother. Perriello’s brother and wife have four children under the age of 8.

In the post, the author gives out the address to his “friends” in Perriello’s district.

“Just in case any of his friends and neighbors want to drop by and say hi and express their thanks regarding his vote for health care,” the author writes. “I personally believe it’s so important for representatives to remain fully grounded and to remember exactly what it is their constituents are saying and how they are telling them to vote. Nothing quite does that like a good face-to-face chat. It has a much more personal touch to it.”

The post does not have a byline but was published on a blog run by an organizer for the Lynchburg Tea Party, a member of the group confirmed to POLITICO. There is no contact information on the blog, but POLITICO has been able to trace the blog to Mike Troxel, an organizer for the Lynchburg Tea Party who has been active in the organization since it launched last year.

In an interview with POLITICO, Troxel admitted to writing the post and said that he has no intention of removing the address from the blog.

Troxel found the address through a directory website and said he would only replace what he currently has on the blog with an address provided by Perriello’s office.

“If they would like to provide me with the address of Tom, then I’d be more than happy to take it down,” he said. “I have no reason to believe it’s not his house.”

“We’re pretty ticked off he voted for it,” Troxel said.

Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

man how does this guy do it?

An Historic Pelosi? [Victor Davis Hanson]

I suppose one could interpret the health care bill as "Pelosi's historic achievement," as the media has been insisting, but that would also mean that an unpopular President and a more unpopular Congress and a most unpopular Speaker together railroaded through an unpopular, sweeping piece of legislation without a single opposition vote, and through the sort of tawdry legislative bribery and procedural gimmicks we haven't seen since the 19th century. So the bill is historic mostly in the minds of the D.C.–New York liberal punditocracy and Democratic stalwarts, for about another seven months, before the people weigh in themselves.

I don't think by year's end too many will call the bill historic; and when the opposition eventually takes over the Congress (and it always does), and its zealots begin to ram through radical, partisan changes, in the manner of Pelosi's precedent, "historic" will be the last adjective we used to look back on March 21 and the role of the Speaker. The means live on; the ends are ephemeral — and Pelosi's conduct tarnished the Congress and will unleash a no-holds-barred reaction when she is out of power that will make historians think very carefully about the real lasting wages of her most unpopular tenure.

03/23 10:40 AMShare

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:16 (fifteen years ago)

xp gee and they were MAD when ppl called them "the mob"

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:16 (fifteen years ago)

This is a historic Civil Rights victory. I'm sure there were people in 1964 saying the exact same things they are saying now.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:17 (fifteen years ago)

ugh poor tom perriello

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:18 (fifteen years ago)

I really can't spot the joeks around here

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:18 (fifteen years ago)

Oh, god, I should've quoted farther down: Troxel, a 2005 graduate of Liberty University, added “I was a journalism major in college, so I have every reason to believe my research is accurate.”

Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

flawless logic

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

ha Liberty is Falwell's college--not surprised that guy is an idiot

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

After 2000-2008 it would be interesting to see what a 'no holds barred' gop congress looks like. Public executions?

mayor jingleberries, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)

the only one better is Oral Roberts University -

http://www.oru.edu/

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

Liberty University hahahaha

kate78, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

Forget for a moment that repealing the bill next year would require Republicans to pick up 41 seats in the House to get a majority (possible, but not likely) and 19 seats in the Senate to get the repeal legislation past a filibuster (impossible, with only 16 Democratic-held seats up for grabs this fall), as well as do something about the guy in the White House who would veto the plan. It would also require the GOP to tell seniors they no longer get the $250 rebate, which they will get this year, to offset the Medicare prescription drug "donut hole"; convince small businesses to give up tax credits, also available this year, that offset up to 35 percent of the cost of healthcare premiums for their workers; persuade parents that insurance companies should be able to deny coverage for kids with preexisting conditions; and get everyone in the country on board with bringing back absurdly low annual limits on what insurance companies will pay for. Plus tell 30 million uninsured Americans that they won't be getting access to healthcare in a few years, as planned. All that might be a tough sell even at a tea party convention.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/03/23/politics_of_healthcare/index.html

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:31 (fifteen years ago)

that is grossly overestimating the average level of intelligence at tea parties

(I had mistyped "teat party" which seems like an altogether different, more alluring animal.)

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

Teats for all

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

Free at the point of provision!

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

The Teat Party: suckling eagerly from big govt.

Chris L, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

Inexplicably, 'teat party' did not occur to me at any point over the year, when looking for bad names to call wingnuts.

ned ragú (suzy), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2234/2422414288_a63d5572a0.jpg.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3144/2422417544_f1e773106c.jpg

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

the choco-teat party.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

EWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

THANK YOU ALFRED

Also I have decided the real reason wingnuts spell things wrong - they think the red lines under the words they write mean they're adding emphasis.

ned ragú (suzy), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

No one wants to associate teats with those nuts.

Chris L, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

why must you ruin everything, Alfred

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

When the teat parties start to curdle...

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

i thought that, pre-Obama, tea parties and teabagging WERE intimately associated w/ nuts ... so to speak.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

http://media.photobucket.com/image/teats/SickendGame/sexy-man-teats.jpg

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)

http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i262/Pollee/sexy-man-teats.jpg

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: STOP IT WITH THE TEATS

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)

eegah

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)

-1 Alfred

naus, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)

teats and manginas, oh my

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

WHY GOD

Mordy, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

at least "sexy-man-teats.jpg" gave me enough warning to know that maybe I didn't want to click on that

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:47 (fifteen years ago)

it's like looking at a nude pic of Hurley (from Lost).

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:48 (fifteen years ago)

http://media.photobucket.com/image/teats/SickendGame/sexy-man-teats.jpg

I mean everything about this URL basically says "WARNING DO NOT CLICK ON ME BECAUSE I AM TERRIFYING"

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:48 (fifteen years ago)

I have a friend that calls the mangina the 'gunt'.

ned ragú (suzy), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:48 (fifteen years ago)

Guys guys we need to get back on topic

Deez Teatz (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.shadyurl.com/

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

man-teats and womb goons!

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

"world's first genderless person" thread is as of this moment immediately underneath this thread.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:51 (fifteen years ago)

is the scatological treatment of gop icons an established liberal strategy

i can remember that santorum.jpg ish from a few years back being pretty successful

nakhchivan, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:52 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: YOUR TEATS ONSCREEN

Religious Embolism (WmC), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:52 (fifteen years ago)

LOL at Guardian URL: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/richard-adams-blog/2010/mar/23/joe-biden-obama-big-fucking-deal-overheard

ned ragú (suzy), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:53 (fifteen years ago)

http://greenspoons.com/h/santorum.gif

HUNGRY HUNGRY TEATS

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:54 (fifteen years ago)

alfred, r u dedicating this run to the departed cankles?

butt pirates of the caribbean (m bison), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

i did not expect to find shitting dick nipples itt

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

so which posts do I need to linkify in order to preserve sanity/lunches

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:01 (fifteen years ago)

This link

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

nice try

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

so glad i have images off--can't handle K-Lo teats

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

Take your pick: crusty teats or Rich Lowry.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:05 (fifteen years ago)

rich lowry's really not THAT bad compared to the peanut gallery he hangs out with

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:05 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: K-LO TEATS

Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

"phoner"??

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

I think that is fairly common slang among journalists for a phone interview.

jam master (jaymc), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

actually it means a boner obtained through the phone

here come the friday afternoon dick emoticons (latebloomer), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:15 (fifteen years ago)

i obtain much phone one

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/dailybeast/20100323/ts_dailybeast/7269_scarynewgoppoll

FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT IN THE PARKING LOT! (milo z), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

57 percent of Republicans (32 percent overall) believe that Obama is a Muslim 45 percent of Republicans (25 percent overall) agree with the Birthers in their belief that Obama was "not born in the United States and so is not eligible to be president" 38 percent of Republicans (20 percent overall) say that Obama is "doing many of the things that Hitler did" Scariest of all, 24 percent of Republicans (14 percent overall) say that Obama "may be the Antichrist."

FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT IN THE PARKING LOT! (milo z), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

I think the scary bit of that is the fact that that many people actually believe in a thing called "The Antichrist"

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

This is real life people, not fucking "End of Days" starring Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:29 (fifteen years ago)

that's kinda doctrinally inherent in xtianity rite?

nakhchivan, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, let's make the healthcare afterglow into some good hearty religion-bashing, that will be fun and productive for everyone

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)

The way those same people are deriding the idea of social justice shows they only call for Christian doctrine when it's politically convenient. Keep in mind churches recently have come out in support for health care reform.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

well not all churches

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/.a/6a00d83451c45669e20120a96a3a35970b-550wi
MY PEN!

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

lol

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

how many more KITH references can we cram in here

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:41 (fifteen years ago)

Proud to be from Delaware today. Thanks, Joe Biden, you crazy fucker!!! xoxo

she is writing about love (Jenny), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:46 (fifteen years ago)

it's all well and good to note that the opposition is completely bonkers, but it does beg the question of how to deal with them/disabuse them of their delusions. they're still voters, you can't just shut them out of the electorate because they're insane.

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:53 (fifteen years ago)

#hellno

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:55 (fifteen years ago)

while i enjoy haughtily sneering at christian fundamentalists as much as the next guy, i gravely doubt the accuracy of those poll numbers. i mean, you have to consider who even indulges that type of question. if i were asked a poll question asking whether the president is the Antichrist, i would decline participation out of sheer disgust / bewilderment.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:57 (fifteen years ago)

yeah there's some pollster-resentment going on in there imo

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

that said, what to do about the crazy people? i don't know, wish i did.

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:00 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-03-23-health-poll-favorable_N.htm

I can only hope republicans continue to lean on their insane and divisive minority membership and isolate themselves further from the mainstream while the rest of the country continues to come to it's senses

akm, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:00 (fifteen years ago)

if i were asked a poll question asking whether the president is the Antichrist, i would decline participation out of sheer disgust / bewilderment.

If I were asked a poll question about whether the president is the Antichrist, I'd say he looks a lot more like Beelzebub.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:02 (fifteen years ago)

it doesnt beg the question, it raises the question

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)

I might believe in the Antichrist, but would put a couple film directors and nearly all of Congress on the suspect list ahead of Hopey Changey.

that said, what to do about the crazy people?

Like the teenyboppers who now think this presidency is a smashing success?

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)

Prove them wrong by making the bill work, show them that grandpa doesn't die but gets more money, that their kids can stay insured longer, that they don't have to worry anymore about having coverage dropped because they get sick.

As for the crazy crazy people who will, say, live off disability but run an anti-gubment website, they're really beyond the beyond. I think they're actually a small fraction of the population, but they're more sensational, so their presence is boosted in media.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)

oh yeah I'm sure those numbers are inflated too but still the question remains - there ARE Tea Party/birther lunatics and they are citizens and they vote.

xp

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)

Like the teenyboppers who now think this presidency is a smashing success?

he's withdrawing from Iraq, closing Gitmo, passed a semi-decent healthcare reform bill = I dunno, he's doing okay. Better than Clinton by a long shot. but smashing success is an exaggeration.

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:06 (fifteen years ago)

he's withdrawing from Iraq

Like Nixon did from Vietnam!

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:10 (fifteen years ago)

Sorry, but I'm still...prickly when it comes to Iraq.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:10 (fifteen years ago)

i don't want to push the LBJ parallels too far, but if afghanistan :: vietnam and the great society :: HCR + ARRA, it looks pretty eerie

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

Prove them wrong by making the bill work, show them that grandpa doesn't die but gets more money, that their kids can stay insured longer, that they don't have to worry anymore about having coverage dropped because they get sick.

Except that making the bill work is years down the road...no one's gonna shit about how this thing works for five years, despite protestations otherwise. Everyone's betting on the come.

Obama is the new Jesus. He is giving me some healthcare! (Dandy Don Weiner), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

and no, LBJ's presidency wasn't exactly a 'smashing success', but his enemies were the worst people the country had to offer and the same is true now

xp

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

I hadn't planned on shitting about this bill regardless of time frame, so Don OTM

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, i have no plans to "pooh-pooh" this bill

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

Everyone's betting on the cum.

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

This thread's been classic today.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:22 (fifteen years ago)

A number of things in the bill start immediately, and others start after 6 months, and others start years later. I think the stuff I listed above all begin this year.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:22 (fifteen years ago)

closing Gitmo

Not yet, plus he's still detaining folks in Afghanistan without charging them. He lost the media battle on civil trials vs military trials here but has yet to establish a military process or designate a courtroom.

If he can straighten that out, fire Geithner and Larry Summers and put others in charge of the economic team, and push to change the Patriot Act, then I'll join the teenyboppers.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

If he can straighten that out, fire Geithner and Larry Summers and put others in charge of the economic team

who should he put in their place?

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

Me! I'd give frappucinos made of aborted babies to the poor.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

okay that's my vote

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

He could go with his economic team from the campaign (Jared Bernstein and others) who he pushed to the back when he brought Robert Rubin's son, Geithner and Summers on, or he could go with an academic. I have just spaced out on the name of that professor...Not Krugman but...

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:28 (fifteen years ago)

Delong?

Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:28 (fifteen years ago)

Tynan Delong?

FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT IN THE PARKING LOT! (milo z), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:29 (fifteen years ago)

Sotosyn?

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:29 (fifteen years ago)

tim geithner got some kind of game in him atm. or new speechwriters anyway:

http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/whats-gotten-tim-geithner

These are difficult issues and our legislators and their staffs often look to the financial industry for advice as they try to sort out what makes sense. This is important to get right but be careful whose voice you listen to.

Listen less to those whose judgments brought us this crisis. Listen less to those who told us all they were the masters of noble financial innovation and sophisticated risk management. Listen less to those who complain about the burdens of living with smarter regulation or who oppose having to pay a fee for the costs of this or future crises.

Instead, listen to the families and businesses still suffering from this crisis. Listen to those who borrowed responsibly but today can't get a loan or can't refinance their mortgage. Listen to those who lost their jobs and their healthcare and their pension savings. Listen to them.

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:30 (fifteen years ago)

Tynan Delong?

lol resist urge to make fun

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

curmudgeon: a man after my own heart.

Jonsi's on a vacation far away (Eisbaer), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

btw I've been reading the Constitution and I stumbled across a couple of things (bold my emphasis):

Article IV, Section 2:

Section 2 - State citizens, Extradition

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.

Amendment 9 - Construction of Constitution:

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Doesn't this kind of rule restrictions against gay marriage unconstitutional and torpedo writing amendments against it before they can even start?

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, I'm not a constitutional scholar but it seems like that is a valid interpretation...?

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

The Fourteenth Amendment is even more awesome.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

But it happened slooooowly. Incorporation of the Bill of Rights so that it covers the states is a hallmark of twentieth century liberal jurisprudence.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

"he's withdrawing from Iraq"

See no sign of it.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

here's geithner's full speech:

http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/tg600.htm

he gave it at AEI, damn

xps just put volcker in charge of the whole thing, shit

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

@ Hi DERE
the argument would be that "gay" men can marry women just like everybody else.

and that's not just Christ-bitten teabaggers; i think at least 4 Supreme Court Justices would feel the same

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:35 (fifteen years ago)

Justice Dere.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:35 (fifteen years ago)

oh ha yeah, 14th Amendment is pretty awesome (just got to it on my readthrough)

So basically the gay marriage uproar should be easily squashable given enough will to prosecute? Can we start suing everyone making these laws on this constitutional basis?

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

Pretty sure that DOMA explicitly excludes gay marriages from the Full Faith and Credit and Privileges and Immunities clauses. Supreme Court has not heard any challenges to DOMA, but all other Federal rulings so far have upheld it.

Like a sausage or snake, smooth and soft (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 19:55 (fifteen years ago)

i don't want to push the LBJ parallels too far, but if afghanistan :: vietnam and the great society :: HCR + ARRA, it looks pretty eerie

― goole, Tuesday, March 23, 2010 3:16 PM (39 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

wait i thought he was carter no reagan, cant keep up

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

i think geithners gotten a sorta bad rap but i wouldnt shed any tears over him getting fired--summers was a bad idea from day one and should never be let near money again, ever--but the problem is, who can obama get confirmed whos even an inch to the left of geithner?

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

my understanding is this bill kills grandma, whos most likely a republican, so everythings gonna work out fiiine

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

Geithner will kill your grandma.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

he already got both of mine ;_;

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

NO ONE TOUCHES MY NANA!

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

i don't have any more alive grandmas ;___;

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

speaking of grandmas, I do find Geithner unexpectedly attractive.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

he's boyish is the thing

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

would return him to the gold standard

And guess what? I think Pitchfork is going to give it a BM. (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

I'll show him some filthy lucre.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)

I've got a 'Gnome Of Zurich' I'd like to introduce him to...

Deez Teatz (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

i would "attach" a "merger agreement" to his "8-K"

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

id let him raise my interest rates

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

he can bail me out of my clothes

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

i bet that guy's pretty leveraged

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)

http://cinie.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/data-geithner.jpg

"Let me feel your balls."

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

http://a.abcnews.com/images/Business/ap_Tim_Geithner_090123_mn.jpg

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

Geithner? Girthner, more like...

ned ragú (suzy), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

http://cinie.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/data-geithner.jpg

haha, he is making the sex claw

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

i'd let him goldman my sachs.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

come sec about me, tim

gelatinous rube (brownie), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

i'd let him adjust my interest rate

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)

haha, he is making the sex claw

More like the Force squeeze.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)

not even a hatef**k from me

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

you can say hatefuck, we're all friends here, this isn't the New York Times

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)

freak-folk vs hatefolk

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)

he can testify on my hill any day of the week

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)

Anal Cunt's hate-folk classic "Picnic of Love" gets vinyl re-release, tour

And guess what? I think Pitchfork is going to give it a BM. (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

man i saw them play that whole thing live once, not pretty

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

haha holy shit, apparently HCR contained bloomberg style food statism!! who knew?

http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/tapped_archive?month=03&year=2010&base_name=stuff_you_didnt_know_about_the

The health-care bill that will be signed by President Obama shortly also includes a provision that will require restaurants with more than 20 locations to place the calorie information for foods on menus so that the information is easy to see while customers order, the Associated Press tells us.

sadly some initial studies indicated calorie labeling doesn't help at all.

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:51 (fifteen years ago)

yeah -- i think a big part of the problem is that a lot people (esp those that don't eat healthily) have no idea what the context of calories is, so they see one of the lower numbers on the burger king menu and think it's "okay" or w/e -- it's kind of impossible to educate people in a way like this, it's kind of something that should be taught in schools or something

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)

freak-folk vs hatefolk

ARMAGEDDON STARTS NOW: FREAK-FOLK WHITE HOUSE INVASION

Further proof that the Obama Administration is taking us down the path to Hell.

Moodles, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

that was evident from O's admiration for that massive bore Bruce Springsteen

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)

its hard to educate anyone who doesnt really give a fuck - the people who do usually figure out that big macs have lots of calories xp

ice cr?m, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)

hey now lets all cool our jets about springsteen

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:05 (fifteen years ago)

we dont want to say anything well end up regretting

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)

so, what did the republicans manage to whittle the bill down to? a 10% off voucher or something?

max arrrrrgh, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

arrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgh

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:08 (fifteen years ago)

yeah -- i think a big part of the problem is that a lot people (esp those that don't eat healthily) have no idea what the context of calories is, so they see one of the lower numbers on the burger king menu and think it's "okay" or w/e -- it's kind of impossible to educate people in a way like this, it's kind of something that should be taught in schools or something

― J0rdan S., Tuesday, March 23, 2010 4:57 PM (3 minutes ago)

ha well i didn't go to school in THE SOUTH but we learned lots about nutrition iirc!

k3vin k., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:10 (fifteen years ago)

Food Group Pyramid was built in 5,000 BC by King Tut iirc.

Calories... you have to score 2,000 in a day to get to the next level, right?

T. Geithner look-alikes permeate carparks (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)

A number of things in the bill start immediately, and others start after 6 months, and others start years later. I think the stuff I listed above all begin this year.

Very handy chart on when the freebies begin.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-03-22-health-you_N.htm?csp=usat.me

Unfortunately, free healthcare for everyone but the rich will not begin until 2014...um, yeah I guess I was right about that in my earlier post.

Health insurance exchanges: A state-based health care exchange -- a marketplace where uninsured individuals and small businesses could comparison shop for insurance policies -- would be created. Effective date — Jan. 1, 2014

Medicaid expansion: The program for low-income Americans under the age of 65 would expand by increasing the income eligibility to 133% of federal poverty, or $29,327 for a family of four. Effective date — Jan. 1, 2014

Federal subsidies: Federal subsidies, which vary based on household income, would help offset the cost of buying insurance for Americans and legal residents who qualify. Effective date — Jan. 1, 2014

According to USAMcPaper, here's what's actually coming in the near future.

Temporary high-risk insurance pool: A $5 billion pool would be created to provide health to individuals with pre-existing medical conditions who have been uninsured for at least six months. Effective date — June 2010 (expires Jan. 1, 2014)

Pre-existing conditions: Insurers would be barred from denying coverage to children who have pre-existing medical conditions. Effective date — Six months after enactment

Adult dependent children: Insurance companies would have to provide coverage for dependent children up to the age of 26. Effective date — Six months after enactment
 
Insurance coverage limits: Insurance plans would be prohibited from placing lifetime limits on how much they pay out to individual policyholders and from rescinding coverage except in cases of fraud. Effective date — Six months after enactment

Preventive services: Health insurance plans would be required to cover preventive services such as immunizations for children and cancer screenings for women. Effective date — Six months after enactment

Medicare drug rebates: Medicare patients who face a gap in prescription drug coverage would receive a one-year, $250 rebate to help pay for medication. Effective date — Immediately

Jesus saved fewer people than my Savior Obama will (Dandy Don Weiner), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:29 (fifteen years ago)

John Cornyn:

In the wake of the passage of health care reform, nearly the entire slate of Republican senatorial candidates seems ready to run on a repeal of the bill. But now, the lawmaker overseeing their election strategy is softening the message. Rather than promising to scrap the bill in its entirety, the GOP will pledge to just get rid of the more controversial parts.

In a brief chat with the Huffington Post on Tuesday, National Republican Senatorial Committee chair John Cornyn (R-Tex.) implicitly acknowledged that Republicans are content with allowing some elements of Obama's reform into law. And they'd generally ignore those elements when taking the fight to their Democrat opponents as November approaches.

"There is non-controversial stuff here like the preexisting conditions exclusion and those sorts of things," the Texas Republican said. "Now we are not interested in repealing that. And that is frankly a distraction.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:38 (fifteen years ago)

Looks like the walkback starts here.

ned ragú (suzy), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:39 (fifteen years ago)

https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/hcrstalwarts?refcode=thermometer

^^ balloon juice has compiled a nice list of reps who either led the post-scott-brown HCR efforts or voted yea despite being in heavy red districts, its worth rewarding them with a little cash i think

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

i'm sure you all have been over this today, but TPM has a new poll showing support for HCR now that it's passed. i don't get why the fact that it's now passed suddenly turns public sentiment in favor of reform. but i won't look a gift magical unicorn in the mouth.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:45 (fifteen years ago)

because people know what's in the bill now

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

o rly?

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

have you read the bill? HELL NO YOU HAVEN'T.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

"no sign" of withdrawal from Iraq, "lost" the case on civil vs. civilian trials, etc. = you guys are retarded and/or not paying attention

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

many xp

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

I expect the support %s to be even higher once the media coverage soaks in

iatee, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

nothing succeeds like success.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

Shakey, we're still holding accused suspects of terrorism indefinitely. That's inarguable.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

and if by "withdrawing" from Iraq we mean, "Killing hundreds of thousands of people and leaving the survivors to wonder whether the fragile coalition holding civil society together will hold" I can't wait to see what an Obama failure looks like.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

x-post=== show me the civil trial in NYC that's gonna happen.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

We are gradually withdrawing from Iraq, though I believe he lengthened the timetable from what he promised during the campaign

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

totally sorry Obama can't magically raise the dead, but combat troops are being withdrawn and will be all gone by next year. I don't know what else anyone could have expected him to do.

we are still holding accused suspects indefinitely without trial and that is bad and I am against it. however, that isn't what I meant when I said "closing Gitmo" - he's trying to bring as many people to trial as possible and release others. the fact that he's accepted that some people will be detained indefinitely is morally reprehensible and legally questionable but it is also the only politically viable solution since basically the VAST majority of Americans prefer security over adherence to the letter of the law.

civil trial in NYC will happen, I think, but let's not argue like its a foregone conclusion or has/has not already happened

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

Alfred I can't tell from your Iraq post whether or not you would have preferred we actually keep combat troops on the ground there...?

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 21:56 (fifteen years ago)

I would have preferred never invading Iraq. It makes no difference to me how long we keep them.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:04 (fifteen years ago)

As far as the NYC trials, it's pretty clear from lots of stories I've read that the Oval Office is going to step on Eric Holder.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:04 (fifteen years ago)

I would have preferred never invading Iraq

well duh. I assume this is the position of anyone who isn't a former member of the Bush administration.

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:07 (fifteen years ago)

But that's why I can't anything involving Iraq a "victory" beside Superman racing around the globe and turning back time.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:08 (fifteen years ago)

if polls show the public support for HCR growing over time, i wonder if the right will give up the legal efforts designed at finding it unconstitutional.

i worry about this commerce clause argument. it isn't off-the-wall, tho i think most constitutional scholars disagree with the argument made in the attorney-generals' lawsuit.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:16 (fifteen years ago)

Brick thrown through Knoxville's Democratic Party HQ..

Here's an article about some crazy dude:

http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2010/03/23/former-militiaman-in-alabama-called-for-breaking-dems-windows/

“[I]f you wish to send a message that [House Speaker Nancy] Pelosi and her party cannot fail to hear, break their windows,” the Pinson, Ala., blogger wrote. “Break them NOW. Break them and run to break again. Break them under cover of night. Break them in broad daylight. Break them and await arrest in willful, principled civil disobedience. Break them with rocks. Break them with slingshots. Break them with baseball bats. But BREAK them.”

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:17 (fifteen years ago)

But that's why I can't anything involving Iraq a "victory"

you never her

akm, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:19 (fifteen years ago)

i have a childhood friend who is basically advocating this crap to. he is not at all stable and I'm a little concerned about it. but I think he's generally harmless and restricted to yelling about 'californiactors ruining the country' in his facebook statuses.

akm, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)

eh, this crap also.

akm, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)

Guy is a fucking terrorist imo

xposts

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:21 (fifteen years ago)

what fucking adult owns a slingshot??

And guess what? I think Pitchfork is going to give it a BM. (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:25 (fifteen years ago)

If a dem pulled that shit during the Bush years, he'd be strung up as a terrorist in Gitmo within the hour.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:27 (fifteen years ago)

.45 caliber gunpowder-powered slingshot

goole, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:27 (fifteen years ago)

he can bail me out of my clothes

― max, Tuesday, March 23, 2010 4:25 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

belated lols

horseshoe, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:36 (fifteen years ago)

alfred you think geithner is attractive but not george clooney i am smdh at you

horseshoe, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:38 (fifteen years ago)

he likes his twonks imo

gelatinous rube (brownie), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:49 (fifteen years ago)

lol!

horseshoe, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:50 (fifteen years ago)

totally sorry Obama can't magically raise the dead

just the occasional reminder that the "you want him to work magic!" line, while it makes the people who use it feel totally great I guess, is 100% bullshit

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:53 (fifteen years ago)

wait is there some non-magical way to raise the dead that I don't know about?

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:55 (fifteen years ago)

or does Obama have Superman: The Motion Picture time-travelling abilities that he's been holding back from using

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)

you want more biotech funding directed towards necromancy?

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)

like I was/am totally against the Iraq War but acting like there was something Obama could have done to keep those hundreds of thousands of people from dying is kinda uh waht

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)

cornerites very pissed about that Cornyn statement.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:57 (fifteen years ago)

from what I can tell Iraq War casualties on Obama's watch have been pretty low/non-existent and he withdrew troops what else did you want him to do (real question!)

xp

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 22:57 (fifteen years ago)

naw dude I just get a itchy posting finger when ppl trot out the "you're asking for magic" thing since it's the line delivered again & again whenever any demand, however slight, is suggested

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:02 (fifteen years ago)

however slight

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:02 (fifteen years ago)

"Obama suggested that people who authorized torture should be held somehow accountable!"
"Oh sorry he's not Gandalf like you hoped"

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:03 (fifteen years ago)

the freakout by the republicans over Biden saying fuck is realllly pointless politically imo. Americans like saying "fuck!"

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:03 (fifteen years ago)

"Sure did talk a great line about single payer"
"UNICORNS! UNICORNS!"

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:04 (fifteen years ago)

reading wall posts on facebook groups against this health bill is a terrifying thing to do, remind me never to do this again.

akm, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:04 (fifteen years ago)

J0hn c'mon, you know installing a permanent Pink Floyd laser light show in the Executive Office building was not going to be as easy as O snapping his fingers

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:05 (fifteen years ago)

look he has the money

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:06 (fifteen years ago)

and he still hasn't returned my copy of Animals

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:06 (fifteen years ago)

oh J0hn...

Obama formally banned torture btw. prosecuting previous abuses is a separate matter and one I agree with you on (EVEN THOUGH IT IS TOTALLY POLITICALLY UNTENABLE AND WILL NEVER HAPPEN). but give credit where credit is due, at least, that's all I'm sayin.

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:06 (fifteen years ago)

like he didn't come into office and say "j/k waterboarding is AWESOME!"

this weird inability of Obama's critics to parse differences of degree is... weird

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:07 (fifteen years ago)

"politics is the art of the possible"
"THEY ARE ALL SPINELESS ANTS COMPARED WITH MY SEVERAL PETITION SIGNATURES"

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:08 (fifteen years ago)

can't believe i fell into your itchy trigger trap AGAIN j0hn

actually yes i can

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:11 (fifteen years ago)

yeah dude I give plenty of credit where due. using language like "moving forward" with reference to letting people who both tortured & murdered prisoners is morally repulsive, though. much credit for the half measure! it's still not nearly enough, and the issue is ground-level enough that it doesn't really matter what he theoretically might not be able to get done in a second term if going after the architects of the torture program cost him reelection. it's a difference of degree, ok, but the glass isn't half full of awesome; it's just a little less full of shit.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:14 (fifteen years ago)

(nb it's O & his speechwriters talking of "moving fwd," not you SMC, 'k)

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:15 (fifteen years ago)

i cant even tell whos trolling who at this point

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:15 (fifteen years ago)

hey we could stop killing afghani civilians and end the blockade against cuba too, but fuck it it's not worth complaining about because maybe it'll never happen

k3vin k., Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:16 (fifteen years ago)

max, I'm never trolling on this issue. I think those of you who are willing to let it go are wrong.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:16 (fifteen years ago)

i'm willing to concede that the deal in Iraq is a lot more complex than "let's just withdraw all of our troops right now"

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:17 (fifteen years ago)

whos trolling who

Aretha Franklin photoshop plz

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:18 (fifteen years ago)

dude J0hn you're harshing my mellow

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:18 (fifteen years ago)

it's just a little torture and murder, let's be cool

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:18 (fifteen years ago)

you have to smoke my posts through a vaporizer Tracer, they're smoother that way

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:19 (fifteen years ago)

murdered prisoners

wait I missed this...?

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:19 (fifteen years ago)

here you go Shakey

I'll warn you, I know we share some old-school lefty values, and this will shake you up.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:21 (fifteen years ago)

Not everyone who is involved in this matter views it from a political perspective, of course. General Al-Zahrani grieves for his son, but at the end of a lengthy interview he paused and his thoughts turned elsewhere. “The truth is what matters,” he said. “They practiced every form of torture on my son and on many others as well. What was the result? What facts did they find? They found nothing. They learned nothing. They accomplished nothing.”

We won't try to get justice for this guy? I become less interested in "differences of degree" at that point.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:22 (fifteen years ago)

I can't think of any reasonable justification for not giving civil trials to these people (held in Gitmo and elsewhere), but I also can't think of reasonable justifications for not trying the previous administration for war crimes. Politically the will doesn't exist and I think that in itself is a solid criticism not just of the Obama administration but of our system of government in general. There needs to be a strong mechanism of oversight in place and it currently does not exist.

wmlynch, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:28 (fifteen years ago)

haven't read the whole thing yet but... ugh. jesus christ

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:30 (fifteen years ago)

j0hn i sincerely hope that some day i or someone i don't even know will be able to deploy 'everybody chill the fuck out - i got this.jpg' with respect to cia and military AND contractor criminality in the GWOT.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:31 (fifteen years ago)

and of course their ultimate enablers in the justice department and the office of the vice president.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:33 (fifteen years ago)

hesitating posting this since i know i have a reputation as some kind of... apologist, or something, around here, but re: that harper's article--its author is a pretty suspect journalist (he used to write for the publication i work at and was asked to stop contributing after getting some facts wrong in a pretty major way, including claiming that he had unreleased photos of US torture that were not only not new but had an abc news watermark on them) and jack shafer had a couple of good articles about the dubious claims he makes:

http://www.slate.com/id/2242942/
http://www.slate.com/id/2243294/

let me just note before anyone goes greenwald on me that it wouldnt be SURPRISING to me in any way if deaths claimed as suicide in guantanamo, abu ghraib or any number of the black sites in afghanistan were... not. but there is plenty of out-there, on-the-record dirt about the stuff that went down and im skeptical of trying to add to a strong case for human rights violations a dubious accusation like this.

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:34 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I'm not gonna "go greenwald" on you max. if 'this guy has a suspect track record' is sufficient grounds for not aggressively & publicly investigating his claims, I don't think there is any point in us talking past each other about our positions.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:38 (fifteen years ago)

the greenwald thing is a reference to greenwald blowing up at jack shafer over this!

whats the prerequisite aggressive public investigation? how credible do claims & their sources have to be? i dont have an answer to this, fwiw. but "suspect track record" is surely part of the consideration?

max, Tuesday, 23 March 2010 23:52 (fifteen years ago)

unless the author of the harpers piece can reasonably be thought to have fabricated all the quotes in his article, then it seems worth pursuing. by the government. whether or not the author gilds lilies to make for better articles is a subject, I guess, for the defense. accept every one of the slate piece's objections, remove them from the article; you're left with what seem like a number of absurd claims by the government & the military about the deaths of these men. that they were being held without any charge of any kind is of course its own outrage, about which you and I agree, except that we differ as to whether it is acceptable to delay charging them until some ideal venue can be imagined for their trials. frankly, if the story were only "three men killed themselves after being detained without charge, and probably tortured, for quite some time," that, too, would demand more action than we are going to get from the administration, and more, to greater shame, than most of the administration's supporters are willing to demand.

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 00:08 (fifteen years ago)

except that we differ as to whether it is acceptable to delay charging them until some ideal venue can be imagined for their trials

whoa where do you get this idea??

frankly, if the story were only "three men killed themselves after being detained without charge, and probably tortured, for quite some time," that, too, would demand more action than we are going to get from the administration, and more, to greater shame, than most of the administration's supporters are willing to demand.

i agree completely

max, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 00:15 (fifteen years ago)

If I were gonna play Fantasy POTUS, I'd subtly cajole McCain into being the central figurehead behind investigating and prosecuting present and past abuse (because apparently McCain is a vain egomaniac and thus susceptible to +10 cajolery). This way I don't lose support from a military I'm currently stretching over a crazy number of fronts while bad guys get put away, or at the least get dressed down by a frothing, indignant McCain.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 00:29 (fifteen years ago)

susceptible to +10 cajolery

lol'd hard at this

Religious Embolism (WmC), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 00:46 (fifteen years ago)

the freakout by the republicans over Biden saying fuck is realllly pointless politically imo. Americans like saying "fuck!"

Oh is this really going on? (thank god I don't have cable)

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:27 (fifteen years ago)

so really, how many orgasms has this event induced in the average ILX Democrat? Did you bring extra underwear to work today?

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:53 (fifteen years ago)

ok Dr. M as one of your most dedicated defenders I gotta say that you don't have any complaint coming if ppl are dicks to you about that post

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:54 (fifteen years ago)

coming...dicks...post

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:54 (fifteen years ago)

several orgasms were induced in me, but unfortunately, i had none of them.

henri grenouille (Frogman Henry), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:55 (fifteen years ago)

john, you act as if dr. morbius made that post out of nowhere

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:55 (fifteen years ago)

i actually think they're filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberals

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:56 (fifteen years ago)

I thought it was crudely amusing, maybe bcz I just came from a totally pointless job interview where I met with FIVE people including a twink Will Ferrell and the CEO, who talked to me about the Clash and Up in the Air. Sorry guys.

xxxxp

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:56 (fifteen years ago)

<3 u morbs

k3vin k., Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:58 (fifteen years ago)

"a twink Will Ferrell," eh? If such a thing exists, send me a photo with his autograph.

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:58 (fifteen years ago)

several orgasms were induced in me, but unfortunately, i had none of them.

― henri grenouille (Frogman Henry), Tuesday, March 23, 2010 9:55 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

lol

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:58 (fifteen years ago)

haha J0rdan

APPLAUD YOU CORPSES (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:58 (fifteen years ago)

twink Will Ferrell

do I make this my new username y/n

the most sacred couple in Christendom (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:59 (fifteen years ago)

Why not?

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:59 (fifteen years ago)

so really, how many orgasms has this event induced in the average ILX Democrat?

None so far.

Did you bring extra underwear to work today?

Today, and every day.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 24 March 2010 01:59 (fifteen years ago)

Alfred, the twink Will Ferrell actually did a riff on Blanche D's "kindness of strangers" line during the interview.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:00 (fifteen years ago)

never change, dr. m

http://rlv.zcache.com/viva_revolution_reagan_poster-p228598300378779018qzz0_400.jpg

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:00 (fifteen years ago)

play this cowbell

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:01 (fifteen years ago)

also I am seeing a Geithner rerun on C-SPAN and Alfred what the hell has happened to your libido's standards?

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:02 (fifteen years ago)

I used it up filling donut holes with semen.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:05 (fifteen years ago)

I was also disappointed that I saw no m4m action b/w Jake and Tobey in Brothers today.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:05 (fifteen years ago)

did either get shown in underwear at least?

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:06 (fifteen years ago)

you & yr incest fetish

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:07 (fifteen years ago)

Jake remained fully clothed and was pious, like the libs on Capitol Hill amirite

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:08 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: GAY THREAD, PART 2: DONUT PORN

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:09 (fifteen years ago)

I am bringing extra underwear to The Prince of Persia

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:09 (fifteen years ago)

I'm sure you guys wd rather be discussing whatever trenchant offal came out of Chris Matthews' piehole tonight

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:10 (fifteen years ago)

the CEO, who talked to me about the Clash and Up in the Air.

Well, I hope you let him know what a hopeless philistine shithead he was.

Religious Embolism (WmC), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:11 (fifteen years ago)

US POLITICS: I DONT HAVE CABLE MORBS

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:12 (fifteen years ago)

if there's anything i won't stand for, it's the insinuation that i or anyone i know cares about the piehole of chris matthews

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:12 (fifteen years ago)

http://i42.tinypic.com/1zr13rd.jpg

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:15 (fifteen years ago)

Brick thrown through Knoxville's Democratic Party HQ..

tracer where did you hear this? i can't find anything about it in the local media (and i am the local media dammit...)

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:53 (fifteen years ago)

I'm sure you guys wd rather be discussing whatever trenchant offal came out of Chris Matthews' piehole tonight

― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 02:10 (46 minutes ago)

man.... you really believe we watch that show and think he's anything other than a nutty old dude? He's basically like you without the zings.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 03:08 (fifteen years ago)

oh the lolz

http://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/10941997847

Jesus saved fewer people than my Savior Obama will (Dandy Don Weiner), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 03:27 (fifteen years ago)

good god jake tapper's twitter background is like a "my first website" preset. crumpled notebook wallpaper? really?

dmr, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 03:41 (fifteen years ago)

actual tweet content also lool

dmr, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 03:41 (fifteen years ago)

I also can't think of reasonable justifications for not trying the previous administration for war crimes. Politically the will doesn't exist and I think that in itself is a solid criticism not just of the Obama administration but of our system of government in general. There needs to be a strong mechanism of oversight in place and it currently does not exist

The justification is that it would be hypocritical, considering the current admin's stance on the matter. The sad fact is that those in power post 9/11 have done nothing to deter the spread of terrorism and have in fact circumvented constitutional laws in order to create more of it. They are putting the USA in danger for the intended longterm benefit of private military contractors.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 05:23 (fifteen years ago)

tipsy i heard it from my dad! though my dad has been known to "exaggerate".. guess it's worth making some calls..

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 10:19 (fifteen years ago)

http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4007/4458527284_21d7409410.jpg

suzy, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 11:36 (fifteen years ago)

that's not a very good signature

nakhchivan, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 11:38 (fifteen years ago)

you trying signing with sixteen fuckin pens

max, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 11:39 (fifteen years ago)

Adam otm! Bam has joined the uninterrupted war crimes parade in the Mansion.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 11:41 (fifteen years ago)

signatures shd be gnomic and illegible, especially if you have to sign about 100 of them a day but i guess he didn't think of that age 16 or w/e

If I were gonna play Fantasy POTUS, I'd subtly cajole McCain into being the central figurehead behind investigating and prosecuting present and past abuse (because apparently McCain is a vain egomaniac and thus susceptible to +10 cajolery). This way I don't lose support from a military I'm currently stretching over a crazy number of fronts while bad guys get put away, or at the least get dressed down by a frothing, indignant McCain.

this seems exactly right about mccain's contrarian narcissism, though understandable in this context

what has he been doing for the last year anyway?

nakhchivan, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 11:45 (fifteen years ago)

working constructively with democrats, to hear him tell it

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 11:46 (fifteen years ago)

but now that health care has passed he said there will be "no cooperation" for the rest of the year

aw

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 11:48 (fifteen years ago)

thats a great idea but havent most (probably unreliable) DC gossip types like halperin been saying that mccain HATES obama with the fire of a thousand suns--& therefore probably wouldnt agree to anything like this just cuz FUCK obama--NOT TO MENTION hes facing a hard-right primary challenge & would be vulnerable politically if he prosecuted torturers (deep, despairing lolz at the fact that holding torturers accountable makes a person politically vulnerable)

max, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 11:50 (fifteen years ago)

xpost to Max/I'm a fellow left-hander with a very similar writing style, so I respectfully submit that you're wrong about the signature.

As others point out, you can see the joins on many letters because he had to use like 25 different pens on one signature, so every politician/invited person at the ceremony had a commemorative pen to take away with them - it's a tradition. Here is the signature written with one pen:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_kvQ-vnqzW5s/SXejh-LgiLI/AAAAAAAAAmI/daQw6sBKJ-Y/s400/obama_signature.jpg

suzy, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 11:50 (fifteen years ago)

anybody remember that weird, pissy letter that mccain wrote to obama shortly after the big o was elected to his national senate seat?

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 11:56 (fifteen years ago)

haha first sentence of it goes like this:

I would like to apologize to you for assuming that your private assurances to me regarding your desire to cooperate in our efforts to negotiate bipartisan lobbying reform legislation were sincere.

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 11:57 (fifteen years ago)

BOOM

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 11:57 (fifteen years ago)

I think we need to see the rest of the text brought up now, just for LOLs.

suzy, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 11:58 (fifteen years ago)

haha

nakhchivan, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 12:00 (fifteen years ago)

February 6, 2006

The Honorable Barack Obama
United States Senate
SH-713
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator Obama:

I would like to apologize to you for assuming that your private assurances to me regarding your desire to cooperate in our efforts to negotiate bipartisan lobbying reform legislation were sincere. When you approached me and insisted that despite your leadership’s preference to use the issue to gain a political advantage in the 2006 elections, you were personally committed to achieving a result that would reflect credit on the entire Senate and offer the country a better example of political leadership, I concluded your professed concern for the institution and the public interest was genuine and admirable. Thank you for disabusing me of such notions with your letter to me dated February 2, 2006, which explained your decision to withdraw from our bipartisan discussions. I’m embarrassed to admit that after all these years in politics I failed to interpret your previous assurances as typical rhetorical gloss routinely used in politics to make self-interested partisan posturing appear more noble. Again, sorry for the confusion, but please be assured I won’t make the same mistake again.

As you know, the Majority Leader has asked Chairman Collins to hold hearings and mark up a bill for floor consideration in early March. I fully support such timely action and I am confident that, together with Senator Lieberman, the Committee on Governmental Affairs will report out a meaningful, bipartisan bill.

You commented in your letter about my “interest in creating a task force to further study” this issue, as if to suggest I support delaying the consideration of much-needed reforms rather than allowing the committees of jurisdiction to hold hearings on the matter. Nothing could be further from the truth. The timely findings of a bipartisan working group could be very helpful to the committee in formulating legislation that will be reported to the full Senate. Since you are new to the Senate, you may not be aware of the fact that I have always supported fully the regular committee and legislative process in the Senate, and routinely urge Committee Chairmen to hold hearings on important issues. In fact, I urged Senator Collins to schedule a hearing upon the Senate’s return in January.

Furthermore, I have consistently maintained that any lobbying reform proposal be bipartisan. The bill Senators Joe Lieberman and Bill Nelson and I have introduced is evidence of that commitment as is my insistence that members of both parties be included in meetings to develop the legislation that will ultimately be considered on the Senate floor. As I explained in a recent letter to Senator Reid, and have publicly said many times, the American people do not see this as just a Republican problem or just a Democratic problem. They see it as yet another run-of-the-mill Washington scandal, and they expect it will generate just another round of partisan gamesmanship and posturing. Senator Lieberman and I, and many other members of this body, hope to exceed the public’s low expectations. We view this as an opportunity to bring transparency and accountability to the Congress, and, most importantly, to show the public that both parties will work together to address our failings.

As I noted, I initially believed you shared that goal. But I understand how important the opportunity to lead your party’s effort to exploit this issue must seem to a freshman Senator, and I hold no hard feelings over your earlier disingenuousness. Again, I have been around long enough to appreciate that in politics the public interest isn’t always a priority for every one of us. Good luck to you, Senator.

Sincerely,

John McCain
United States Senate

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 12:01 (fifteen years ago)

ok i've read that twice and can't work out what the important issue was. lobbying reform?

DarraghmacKwacz (darraghmac), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 12:03 (fifteen years ago)

he writes bitchy well, though.

DarraghmacKwacz (darraghmac), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 12:03 (fifteen years ago)

it's like he really comes into his own

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 12:05 (fifteen years ago)

Senator Lieberman and I, and many other members of this body, hope to exceed the public’s low expectations.

nakhchivan, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 12:05 (fifteen years ago)

xp waiting for that sentence to finish tbh- i'm reading too many TMI threads

DarraghmacKwacz (darraghmac), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 12:06 (fifteen years ago)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Oh, where to even start?

suzy, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 12:08 (fifteen years ago)

there's a bloviated self-aggrandizing pretence that he is upholding the virtues of a fairer age or something, as if a longterm senator wouldn't have fucked people over in exactly the same terms he claims to despise

such an idiot but i guess the next one will be even worse

nakhchivan, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 12:11 (fifteen years ago)

it's a little like posting a big, pompous kiss-off letter to your girlfriend on facebook and then emailing everyone about it

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 12:15 (fifteen years ago)

toss-up as to which aspect is worse tbh

DarraghmacKwacz (darraghmac), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 12:19 (fifteen years ago)

Whereas I was just kind of flummoxed by the hypocrisy of it all, plus 20/20 hindsight viewed through 14 months of 'oh woe is us, with his mandate, why does he insist on bipartisanship?'

suzy, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 12:23 (fifteen years ago)

Isn't McCain in a heated reelection campaign? Meaning his ornery contraianism is even more ornery, since the dude running to his right is making inroads. But yeah, McCain's profile is fading every bit as fast as Kerry's did post-election, which always baffles me. A year ago, this guy was prepared to be president, and millions of people wanted him to be president, too. So why isn't he more of a prominent party leader? Same goes for Kerry. Or is the idea that because he lost by a few million votes (drop in the bucket, really) he's duty bound to stay mostly out of the way?

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)

Not true of Kerry. He's now chairman of Foreign Relations and was all over the Afghan surge.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)

In the Senate he's actually more powerful than ever; we just haven't heard from the Committee much.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:08 (fifteen years ago)

McCain gets to go on those Sunday talk shows every week. Washington Monthly and others always provide the stats every week on how those lazy shows just keep going to him.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:11 (fifteen years ago)

Avoiding the Sunday morning pimp circuit is a sign of intelligence.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:12 (fifteen years ago)

Kerry lost a closer election than McCain did, and his temperament dictated he go back to his committees etc. and get on with being a Senator instead of going on the news channel equivalent of ChatRoulette to bitch about the loss 24/7. Sarah Palin is a factor, also too.

suzy, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:13 (fifteen years ago)

hey tracer, thx to yr dad for that tip, it checked out (tho they can't say for sure that it was politically motivated etc etc).

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:13 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, if you want a visual for 'butthurt' just use that one pic of McCain going 'grrrrrrrr' ad infinitum.

suzy, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)

that one

nakhchivan, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:15 (fifteen years ago)

^^^that, too

suzy, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:17 (fifteen years ago)

A year ago, this guy was prepared to be president, and millions of people wanted him to be president, too. So why isn't he more of a prominent party leader?

I think he's done a pretty good shift from being perceived as a moderate or centrist straight into batshit rightwing territory. He probably had a lot of Dem fans years ago, but hell no nowadays. He has bought into the talking points all-you-can-eat restaurant.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:20 (fifteen years ago)

he was always a little batshit--he fell off the deepend with his friend from Alaska

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:22 (fifteen years ago)

A year ago, this guy was prepared to be president, and millions of people wanted him to be president, too. So why isn't he more of a prominent party leader?

he won the nom because he appealed to a certain segment of the republican party and sorta by default, but after his turn to the right he wasn't accepted by the hardcore conservatives (who have now become a solid majority of the party) or the moderates (who now think he's loony)... most of the millions of people who voted for him wanted a. obama not to be president b. sarah palin to be president. he's gone from maybe the most popular politician in america (2004 era) to someone who's alienated basically everybody in both parties. pretty impressive.

iatee, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:35 (fifteen years ago)

But those Sunday talkshow hosts still love him...

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:39 (fifteen years ago)

Does he still host BBQs for the press?

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)

So Rush Limbaugh said on the air awhile back that if health care passed he would leave the US 5 years later when all of it begins to kick in. So we get to start the clock now--not sure which military dictatorship he will go to so as to avoide socialist healthcare.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:50 (fifteen years ago)

George McGovern survived being an even bigger presidential loser than McCrazy, but bcz of Nixon's pyrrhic victory he was admired for his principled flameout (the Eagleton mess notwithstanding).

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:52 (fifteen years ago)

Then there's the sad case of Hubert Humphrey.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)

I really hope Glenn Beck does an episode where he analyzes Barack's signature.

Fetchboy, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)

Cornyn recants:

Some media outlets have misrepresented my position on repealing and replacing the President’s $2.6 trillion health care bill. Make no mistake about it: I fully support repealing this Washington takeover of health care and replacing it with a bipartisan bill that lowers the cost of health care.

Republicans have long pointed out that there are areas of health care reform where there is bipartisan agreement. Yet, instead of working with Republicans to solve issues of bipartisan concern such as pre-existing condition exclusions, Democrats insisted on a purely partisan bill that included massive tax hikes, trillions of dollars in new taxpayer spending, and cuts to Medicare, while failing to address rising health care costs.

We will do what Democrats failed to do; start with common-sense measures and craft a truly bipartisan bill that does not raise taxes, does not pillage $500 billion from a bankrupt Medicare program and does not increase premiums on working families.”

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 14:59 (fifteen years ago)

obama's sig has the anarchist symbol omg

harshbuzz to my chilt-on (zvookster), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)

LOL it does have an obvious bit of golden ratio symbolism in it; although graphology is dubious generally some personality traits are carried in the writing.

GWB: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4a/GWB_signature_2007.jpg

suzy, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

GW 13L

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)

it's like Barack ☮ really rather than Barack http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7a/Anarchy-symbol.svg/40px-Anarchy-symbol.svg.png

harshbuzz to my chilt-on (zvookster), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:06 (fifteen years ago)

Alfred, I truly loathe Humphrey. Hunter Thompson had that hack's number.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:07 (fifteen years ago)

"Ladies and gentlemen! Hubert... Horatio... Hornblower!!!!"

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:11 (fifteen years ago)

Well, that's my point. One of the few libs to support civil rights openly in the late forties and fifties, he degenerated into such a lapgdog for (a) LBJ and (b) the Dem bosses that he was almost Nixon-worthy of contempt.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)

i.e. Kerry is NOT Humphrey.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)

No, Albert, Nixon will always be a mile in front of him in the contempt stakes.

suzy, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

Former president Scott Brown please asks you not to 'pooh-pooh' his election.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

Governor of Washington kicks Attorney General in the balls over his decision to sue the Feds over HCR without, maybe, asking her:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5Ng5lYw3kE&feature=player_embedded

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

Also, Sarah Palin wants you to shoot Democrats:

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2757/4459700304_ac71b3da1f_o.jpg

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)

nice use of gun sights there

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)

"...we carried in 2008..." I don't get it.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

To complete the disingenuity, she posted it on her Facebook page under the headline, "Don't retreat -- RELOAD!"

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:58 (fifteen years ago)

uh i don't see that? she must have changed it

http://www.facebook.com/sarahpalin#!/notes/sarah-palin/dont-get-demoralized-get-organized-take-back-the-20/373854973434

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

xxp I presume districts that McCain/Palin won in 2008, which therefore have a better-than-average chance of flipping congressional affiliation in 2010.

jam master (jaymc), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:02 (fifteen years ago)

so is still okay if we shoot them or?

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:02 (fifteen years ago)

no. please do not shoot candidates. thank you.

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

like she's dumb, right? but i pray to God she's not THAT dumb.

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

are we healthy yet or is our health still upcoming?

ksh, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

xxxp Whoops, it was her Twitter feed: http://twitter.com/SarahPalinUSA/status/10935548053

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

I actually came down with a slight cold on Monday so clearly I blame the bill's passage for it.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

Followup from the story I posted yesterday:

Law enforcement authorities are investigating an incident that occurred at the Virginia home of Rep. Tom Perriello’s (D-Va.) brother, whose address was publicized by tea party activists angry at the congressman’s vote for the health care bill.

The FBI would not disclose the details of the incident, but said that they have been to the home.

“This is very preliminary at this point, so we’re not making any comment at this time,” local FBI spokesman M.A. Myers told POLITICO.

A spokesman for the Albemarle County Fire Marshal would not comment on whether they too are investigating the incident.

POLITICO reported on Monday that Mike Troxel, an organizer for the Lynchburg Tea Party, posted on his blog what he thought was the congressman’s address, encouraging tea party activists to “drop by.”

The address has since been posted on websites of at least one other local tea party activist.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

xxp I presume districts that McCain/Palin won in 2008, which therefore have a better-than-average chance of flipping congressional affiliation in 2010.

Thanks. I foolishly thought 'we' meant Republicans as opposed to her royal self.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

what the fuck--i cannot believe that idiot said that on twitter

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

Secret Service must be really busy these days

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

Mike Troxel

http://www.nagafighter.com/index.php?module=eventdetailpage/6

Hmmm.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

Brown, in an interview from Washington, D.C., rejected criticism that the passage of health care reform means he failed to deliver on his most powerful campaign message. He said he is pushing for amendments to the so-called “fix-it” bill before Senate members.

“You know they can try to pooh-pooh my election and try to minimize it and all that stuff,” Brown said. “I get what they’re trying to do. But the bottom line is they are going to start to carve out folks who are disabled and have some very serious medical issues and say, ‘See the Republicans want to take this away.’ ”

Scott Brown, fortunately not batshit enough.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

has scott brown totally bought into his own hype or what?

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

he'd bought into his own hype during the campaign

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 16:55 (fifteen years ago)

TPM offers an amusing selection of amendments to reconciliation that have been proposed by the GOP:

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK): To reduce the cost of providing federally funded prescription drugs by eliminating fraudulent payments and prohibiting coverage of Viagra for child molesters and rapists for drugs intended to induce abortion.

Vitter: Prohibiting use of funds to fund the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). (Adding to the ridculousness, ACORN folded just this week.)

Coburn: To require that each new bureaucrat added to any department or agency of the Federal Government for the purpose of implementing the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act be offset by a reduction of 1 existing bureaucrat at such department or agency.

Sen. David Vitter (D-LA): To repeal the government takeover of health care.

Coburn: To revoke the powers given the Secretary of Health and Human Services under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Coburn: To help the President keep his promise that Americans who like the health care coverage they have now can keep it.

Coburn: To repeal the new $375 million program directing the very same Federal Government that has amassed a $12 trillion debt to lecture Americans about financial responsibility.

Sen. Bob Bennett (R-UT): To protect the democratic process and the right of the people of the District of Columbia to define marriage.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) To make sure the President, Cabinet Members, all White House senior staff and Congressional Committee and Leadership staff are purchasing health insurance through the health insurance exchanges established by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Coburn: To require all Members of Congress to read a bill prior to casting on a vote on the bill.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

Sen. David Vitter (D-LA): To repeal the government takeover of health care.

lol

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

i get why they think this is a winning strategy but i cant really imagine this isnt just as easily spun as GOP obstructionism

max, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) To make sure the President, Cabinet Members, all White House senior staff and Congressional Committee and Leadership staff are purchasing health insurance through the health insurance exchanges established by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

i actually agree with this one -- if they're gonna force congress to do it, exec branch might as well too

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:22 (fifteen years ago)

Coburn: To require all Members of Congress to read a bill prior to casting on a vote on the bill.

this one is so hilarious -- are they gonna give multiple choice tests on certain provisions in the bills to make sure that all members read the bill?

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)

The new regulated market for health insurance, as stated in the bill is called

A "the supermarket"
B "the exchanges"
C "eBay"
D "the store"
E "none of the above"

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)

I'd settle for all Members of Congress being required to be able to read

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:25 (fifteen years ago)

the "no viagra for rapists" ammendment is so obviously written as campaign ammunition fodder. can't wait to see the ads.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:27 (fifteen years ago)

To reduce the cost of providing federally funded prescription drugs by eliminating fraudulent payments and prohibiting coverage of Viagra for child molesters and rapists for drugs intended to induce abortion.

... This has typos in it, right? Because they can't really propose to reduce the cost of providing federally funded prescription drugs by prohibiting coverage of rapists for drugs intended to induce abortion, mostly because that doesn't really make any sense...?

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

and if that is actually what was meant, since that is what was written, exactly which provision in the healthcare plan covers abortion medication for rapists, because that is some next-level conscience-free forward-looking shit

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

I think there's an "and" missing after "rapists" but lololol dan

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:32 (fifteen years ago)

Your more polite rapists do hand out Plan B afterwards tbf.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:35 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, they just want to rape, they don't want to get nailed for child support, you know?

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

interesting usage of the word "nailed" there

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

nobody should be forced to bear the child of rape, not even lady rapists.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

how many lady rapists get government funded abortions??? megyn kelly needs to look into this imo

goole, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

who do i have to fuck to get an abortion around here???

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

^^^new thread title plz

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

Not to derail here, but what really gets me is that after all of the shit this country has been through in the last decade - 9/11, questionable wars, near complete economic meltdown - trying to provide healthcare to more people is REALLY going to be the issue that drive people to take up arms? I mean, wtf.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

Can we poll on these amendments?

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

healthcare to more people is REALLY going to be the issue that drive people to take up arms?

Yeah, I've been saying the same thing, esp after that batshit cartoon with weeping Lady Liberty having been screwed by Obama.

Get a grip, wingnuts. I voted for him (and manned phone banks and canvassed door to door) so that he could do exactly this. (And more -- I wanted the socialist, nation-killing public option, too. The horror...)

I turn it up when I hear the banjo (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

I also seem to have a hard time not reading racist undertones in all of this, like "I pay for my family's healthcare, but I'll be damned if I pay for that lazy [insert racial epithet here] down the road!".

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 18:36 (fifteen years ago)

I also seem to have a hard time not reading racist undertones in all of this, like "I pay for my family's healthcare, but I'll be damned if I pay for that lazy [insert racial epithet here] down the road!".

That's an "undertone"? I think the subtext is rapidly becoming text.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

one dude on the radio this morning: "I'm not saying anything racial, but there's lots of folks out there breeding like cockroaches"

FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT IN THE PARKING LOT! (milo z), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

Make no mistake, much of it is totally racist. I saw a chat page where some dude was saying "I'll be damned if I'm paying for medical care for every Jose and Jamal in America..."

I turn it up when I hear the banjo (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

overtext more like

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

so much anti-mormon hate out there :(

iatee, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

Well, it is, in part. I'm having an IM conversation with the bud I alluded to on Sunday – the one without health care thanks to his diabetes. My mom, a Cuban-American who emigrated in 1960, said she doesn't want to give illegal immigrants "her" health care.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 18:41 (fifteen years ago)

"it" = covert racism

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 18:41 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, I had a Facebook debate with my bro-in-law on Monday, and he fell back on the "I just don't see why I should give any of MY money to THOSE people" argument. I had to give up, too depressing.

Religious Embolism (WmC), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/state_regional/state_regional_govtpolitics/article/democrats_step_up_fight_against_cuccinelli_lawsuit/332582/

State Democrats today blasted Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli’s lawsuit against the federal government over health-care reform as a “right-wing” pursuit “doomed to fail,“ and said they filed a Freedom of Information Act request to find out how much money is being spent on the action.

Virginia was the first state in the nation to complete passage of legislation barring their residents from being required to purchase health insurance.

In filing the lawsuit against the federal government, Virginia joined at least 13 other states challenging the health-system overhaul.

Cuccinelli’s constitutional challenge is largely based on the argument that the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution cannot be used by Congress to mandate that individuals purchase health insurance as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 18:46 (fifteen years ago)

"I just don't see why I should give any of MY money to THOSE people"

social contract - go buy a private island if you can't deal with other people's needs

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

That's not how a lot of self-made people look at life. I've dealt with this forever. The self-made man has no sympathy if not outright contempt for someone who didn't succeed as well as he did.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 19:00 (fifteen years ago)

social contract - go buy a private island if you can't deal with other people's needs

I should post that to the argument thread, but we're still on good terms and that might scotch it.

Religious Embolism (WmC), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 19:02 (fifteen years ago)

That's not how a lot of self-made people look at life. I've dealt with this forever. The self-made man has no sympathy if not outright contempt for someone who didn't succeed as well as he did.

yeah my dad notes this a lot in his conversations with right-wingers he encounters, this basic lack of empathy, total inability to see themselves in other people. sad.

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

lotta those self-made types at the teabag rallies

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 19:06 (fifteen years ago)

It's fairly easy to point out to successful (and even unsuccessful!) people the direct benefits they've received from the government and the law tho. It doesn't always work, because some people are stupid and blinkered and can't be reasoned with, unfortunately.

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

shakey mOTM

(people who consider themselves self-made) - (people who are truly self-made) >>>> 0

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

i don't know that it has anything to do with a self made person and more to do with the kind of human being that person is on the inside.

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

^^ TRUTH BOMB

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

Washington (CNN) -- Defense Secretary Robert Gates is expected to announce changes Thursday easing the Defense Department's "don't ask, don't tell" policy prohibiting homosexuals from serving openly in the military, a senior Defense Department official has confirmed to CNN.

The official said one of the changes will be that outings by third parties may no longer be automatic grounds for initiating separation proceedings, especially if it is proven that the person making the allegation has a grudge against the military member.

Gates' announcement will focus on regulatory changes that can be made at the Pentagon without the approval of Congress, which has been debating whether to change the policy.

President Obama has asked for a repeal of the measure.

J0rdan S., Wednesday, 24 March 2010 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

"self-made" now basically means that you've held a job for more than a year and don't shit your pants in public on a regular basis

And guess what? I think Pitchfork is going to give it a BM. (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 19:10 (fifteen years ago)

Shorin' up his lib base.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 19:11 (fifteen years ago)

"especially if it is proven that the person making the allegation has a grudge against the military member"

should this really be a factor in the application of a policy (which shouldn't exist anyway)?

i imagine this would suck for those who are outed by third parties w/out grudges. "sorry, you have nothing to blame but your orientation, and CHANCE! goodbye. next!"
xpost

fat mantis (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

a glimpse inside today's washington:

As I alluded to earlier, I laughed out loud when Pelosi tried to tell some of us last week that bipartisanship is important to her, earning myself a chastising punch in the shoulder from the Speaker.

http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2010/03/gop-never-took-yes-for-an-answer.php

goole, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

I like that when you bookmark a thread, whatever its title was when you did so is what shows up when there are new answers, so YOUR TWEETS ONSCREEN still pops up at the top of the page for me regularly.

Religious Embolism (WmC), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

xpost -- "Then she hit me over the head with that hammer and things got weird..."

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

severed gas line found at the congressmen's brothers' house

http://www2.dailyprogress.com/cdp/news/local/crime/article/damage_at_home_of_perriello_brother_under_investigation/54038/P20/

gelatinous rube (brownie), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 19:57 (fifteen years ago)

when Coleman learned that the address actually belonged to the congressman’s brother, he responded on a blog: “Do you mean I posted his brother’s address on my Facebook? Oh well, collateral damage.”

you belong in jail

famous for hating everything (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

The thing I want to point out here, is that however chilling their malice, these baggers are still the can't shoot straight (terrorist) gang - it was his brother's house.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)

sure that's comforting to the brother

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i think that makes it worse!

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

I, for one, do not want deranged teabaggers chasing me down the street screaming "IT'S OBAMA! GET HIM!" even though I am about 3 feet shorter than the President and have facial hair and live in MA.

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

Federal and local authorities are investigating the severed gas line, which connected a propane tank to a gas grill on the home’s screened-in porch, according to sources in Tom Perriello’s office.

glad to know the angry mob has traded in their firebrands for clean, efficient propare.

but seriously: shakey mo otm -- incarcerate that fucker

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i think that makes it worse!

Worse, for sure, but also that these people are loony, often racist and homophobic rage-fuelled goons, will, as Shakey pointed out above, be used agaisnt not only them but the cynical GOP who tried to exploit that. I mean, the GOP was on board with them when they called it socialism, and yet they're the party that recently pushed for increasing the far more socialist Medicare benefits without any responsible funding and have backed military socialism more fervently than anyone. If you're going to use stupid epithets to compare people with something 'odious', at least make sure they have some tenuous relationship with it.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

Can't wait til the first teabagger gets federal time and they start protesting this grievous abuse of justice.

FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT IN THE PARKING LOT! (milo z), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

x-post; I read that as incinerate -- and still concur.

I turn it up when I hear the banjo (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

Make no mistake, much of it is totally racist. I saw a chat page where some dude was saying "I'll be damned if I'm paying for medical care for every Jose and Jamal in America..."

totally. animus toward a variety of --isms is what's really simmering under the debate.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

The fact that these 'firebrands' fear of a tyrannical government is now looking more and more self-fulfilling amuses me.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

""I'll be damned if I'm paying for medical care for every Jose and Jamal in America..."

I think he'll find the joke works better if you replace Jose with Juan.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

i wonder how far it goes?

do you think these guys secretly wish for stuff like health care to get passed because it just gives them more material?

And guess what? I think Pitchfork is going to give it a BM. (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think most of these people are coherent enough to wish for anything, honestly.

FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT IN THE PARKING LOT! (milo z), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

Holy shit, I just googled and "Jose and Jamal" is evidently becoming some sort of widespread wingnut meme.

I turn it up when I hear the banjo (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

From the looks of things, I'd say they wish the British, the Nazis and Stalin would invade.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

The thing I want to point out here, is that however chilling their malice, these baggers are still the can't shoot straight (terrorist) gang - it was his brother's house.

That family that was murdered in the PNW for having the same name as someone whose father had once been on some kind of John Birch/militia "watch list" probably didn't take any comfort from the fact that he had the wrong house, either.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

do you think these guys secretly wish for stuff like health care to get passed because it just gives them more material?

sort of. i think GOP elites secretly hope roe v. wade isn't overturned outright. it would -- at a minimum -- defuse a lot of their outrage-machine and the base's enthusiasm.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

No, I concede that Laurel. I just mean it's emblematic of the kind of radicalism that made someone like Eisenhower eschew them.

xpost

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

ok here's my armchair psychobullshit:

all these guys like to crow about how they are definitely not racists -- they don't hate anyone or judge anyone, except the "unproductive". they are calling the democratic party fascist, which is some kind of novelty (tho not really, if you dig into hard-right libertarian shit far enough -- i've read stuff on the super-way-out-there randian spectrum that takes it as a given that christianity, islam, and marxism are all basically the same thing, and market capitalist liberty is the opposing force to all of them, slave-monotheism vs. productive chaos kind of shit. wild. glenn beck gets some kind of award for bringing this into the light of day...)

the key i think is how they think of themselves: heroes, men alone, under siege. all of history has been a struggle to give birth to america, and all of american history is a struggle to give birth to them. it's just a crystal-clear FACT that they are the real center of the nation, and everyone else is here basically by bad accident, hanging on. they can be good people

and it's a zero-sum thing. if any other kind of person has a moment in the sun, anywhere, for any reason, it's a threat. there is a fear of being lost in a crowd that is at the emotional core of this whole deal. you're told all your life your a prince by virtue, but the facts on the ground are that you don't mean shit, no more or less than anyone else. an "aristocracy of the common dude" kind of a thing. so yeah, there is a kind of perverse enjoyment (as M@tt says) of anything that makes you feel under the gun -- of course, you're the hero, right?

i don't doubt there's still a lot of good old fashioned southern contempt for black people too, but it's not exactly the same thing.

goole, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

i don't think any reactionary tea party types actually *wanted* HCR to become law, but I'm sure that some will take its passage as the prompt and reason to escalate the confrontation.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

Holy shit, I just googled and "Jose and Jamal" is evidently becoming some sort of widespread wingnut meme.

Hmmm, I did the same thing and found only 24 hits for "Jose and Jamal," fewer than 10 of which were used in this vein (as opposed to a discussion of NBA players Jose Calderon and Jamal Crawford).

jam master (jaymc), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

i kinda feel like one of the things that draws people to teapartying (teapartyism; teapartytime; teapartyingon), and that makes it to some degree resistant to a declining profile/public opprobrium, is that it's fun: it's invigorated a previously dormant, inert strata of society into being politically active, attending marches, speaking out and finding fraternity in doing so. obviously a lot of the beliefs are wired up in this but it seems to go hand in hand with the sort of reckless, fantasist stance of it all. it's like kids making shit up because it feeds into a fun game they're playing that means they can roll around and get their clothes dirty. standing in front of the white house and shouting NAZI MOTHERFUCKER in front of armed cops has to be exciting on some level.

egregious apostrophising (schlump), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

yeah well when they start shooting people it's no longer fun for anyone

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

This goes here too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ok1EllhHgoU

SourPatchCorpse, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

i mean yeah it's funny and all to make fun of the other side but vandalizing someone's house is some straight up bullshit.

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

(x-post) Granted, I found one Jose/Jamal reference on an assault weapons site and another on immigraton reform (neither of which was the one I first saw) and extrapolated.

I turn it up when I hear the banjo (Dan Peterson), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

Guys I heard it is in the constitution that if you break a congressman's window five times they have to go back in time and change their vote.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

Today I hung out w a family member, who voted McCain and is on some mailing list for batshit rightwing cartoons, and he said "You know, I think I'm kinda glad they passed health care reform. They had to do something." He didn't say much else but it made me happy.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

ha i read a blog comment somewhere that if enough democrats who voted yes are voted out to bring the number back under 216, the vote is invalid.

goole, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

haha that is such a fundamental misunderstanding of how gov't works it's ... I dunno what it is. Ristupidiculame

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

can someone point me to some quick reports on health insurance industry profits and ceo compensation? The best thing I can find right now is this: http://blog.aflcio.org/2009/05/27/health-insurance-profits-soar-as-industry-mergers-create-near-monopoly/

akm, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

Today I hung out w a family member, who voted McCain and is on some mailing list for batshit rightwing cartoons, and he said "You know, I think I'm kinda glad they passed health care reform. They had to do something." He didn't say much else but it made me happy

<3 this post

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

that video was really fucking harsh, sourpatchcorpse.

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)

At least Palin is doing her part to discourage violence etc. against legislators.

the gun-sight icons are a particularly subtle touch.

everybody on ilx u have dandruff (Pillbox), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 22:37 (fifteen years ago)

posted upthread yo

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 22:42 (fifteen years ago)

sry

everybody on ilx u have dandruff (Pillbox), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 22:43 (fifteen years ago)

Haha I pointed that graphic with crosshairs out during a debate with a conservative acquaintance today and he fell back on the "OMG if you think that is encouraging violence it is another example political correctness GONE MAD".

loooool

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)

I hope that was followed by shooting him in the face

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 22:57 (fifteen years ago)

This topic has been funny for two days on Twitter, y'all: #SarahPalinOnDiscover

I am convinced this is what Roger Ebert now does all day.

suzy, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 22:59 (fifteen years ago)

There are many vile things I'd rather watch in place of ever having to see that Youtube video

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 23:01 (fifteen years ago)

Including a VHS of Sherman Helmsley teabagging Nell Carter

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 23:01 (fifteen years ago)

hey dude was a gong fan, take it easy

And guess what? I think Pitchfork is going to give it a BM. (M@tt He1ges0n), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 23:04 (fifteen years ago)

Including a VHS of Sherman Helmsley teabagging Nell Carter

My understanding was that it was the other way around.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 23:07 (fifteen years ago)

Man, I know someone recently complained about Digby being smug on her blog, but she is OTMFM about our useless cable news jacktards here:
CNNs Rick Sanchez was all confused about why so many people might suddenly be in favor of the HCR bill when they thought it was a bad idea before. Blitzer explains:

Well, you know, when people are asked, we did that poll CNN Opinion Research Poll, that said, "you like this health care bill or not like it", we just assumed that the people who said they didn't like it didn't like it because it was too much interference, or too much taxes or whatever.

But if you take a closer look at people who didn't like it, about 12% of those people who said they didn't like it they didn't like it because they didn't think it went far enough. They wanted a single payer option, they wanted the so-called public option, they didn't like not from the right, they didn't like it because it wasn't left or liberal enough.

That's how you got 50% of the American people who said, "we don't like this plan." But only about 40 or 38% were the ones who said it was too much government interference.

That's so interesting, don't you think? Maybe Blitzer should put something in the suggestion box about that.

All we've been hearing for months now is that the "American people" don't like the bill because it's a government takeover. The Republicans turned that into their entire rationale for opposition, claiming that the Democrats are going against "the will of the people" and somehow usurped the Democratic process. And here it turns out that it's only the Republicans and a few conservative "independents", 38% or so of the country, who think the bill is a government takeover.

That's quite a different story don't you think? One that might have been told before now by the news networks? It might have changed the whole damned debate, actually.

Blitzer admits that they just "assumed" that everyone in the country held this wingnut view. After all, the pictures showed a bunch of angry middle aged white people screaming about socialism, and they look like their perception of Real America, so why bother to drill down into the numbers any further?

This is a perfect example of the village advancing its narrative of a great conservative majority that doesn't exist. It's a pathology with these people.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 23:09 (fifteen years ago)

"smug" nothing. I love Digby.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 23:13 (fifteen years ago)

"smug"=when Democrats have the gall to say something with the same amount of arrogance as Republicans...

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 23:15 (fifteen years ago)

that is not otm

k3vin k., Wednesday, 24 March 2010 23:38 (fifteen years ago)

not in an absolute sense, no, but why is it that democrats get called "smug" for using similar tactics to the GOP? I'm not saying i advocate being smug but it's just like when a bunch of hyperbolic fact-twisting right-wing stalwarts whined about Fahrenheit 9/11 taking liberties with the facts and being histrionic.

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 23:41 (fifteen years ago)

The thing that drives me crazy about all these loudmouth rugged individualists is how willing they are to attach themselves to whatever angry demagogue happens to be passing, and how they justify it by saying everyone they know feels the same way.

suzy, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 23:46 (fifteen years ago)

WA Gov. Chris Gregoire GOES IN on Republican WA Attorney General (and possible 2012 gubernatorial hopeful) Rob McKenna over his unilateral HCR lawsuit like daaaaamn:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5Ng5lYw3kE&feature=player_embedded

the real dangers horses in black neighborhoods face (The Reverend), Wednesday, 24 March 2010 23:52 (fifteen years ago)

i think it was me who said that about digby - maybe smug's not exactly right but she's very often tribal and tabloidy about what she highlights - irrelevant pseudo-scandals about republicans, weighing in on pointless republican gaffes. THEM:BAD IDIOTS/US:ENLIGHTENED AND GOOD can get pretty ... smug?

goole i figure "a lot of good old fashioned southern contempt for black people" was actually also pretty wrapped up in the fears of powerlessness you limn

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 24 March 2010 23:53 (fifteen years ago)

^^ yup -- the "aristocracy of the common (white) man" in particular has been the theme for a long-ass time

oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:01 (fifteen years ago)

WA Gov. Chris Gregoire GOES IN on Republican WA Attorney General (and possible 2012 gubernatorial hopeful) Rob McKenna over his unilateral HCR lawsuit like daaaaamn:

http://www.youtube.com/v/k5Ng5lYw3kE&feature=player_embedded&fs=1&hl=en

― the real dangers horses in black neighborhoods face (The Reverend), Wednesday, March 24, 2010 7:52 PM (8 minutes ago)

BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

is she always like that?

k3vin k., Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:02 (fifteen years ago)

you better have your mustache on straight with the hon. gov. gregoire

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:05 (fifteen years ago)

The weird thing is she's a really uninspiring candidate who has barely gotten elected twice even with partisan advantage and (in one election) Obama's coattails, but when she's angry she becomes the best person on earth. Now if only she could have gotten as fired up as Dino Rossi as she is about McKenna.

the real dangers horses in black neighborhoods face (The Reverend), Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:10 (fifteen years ago)

fired up at Dino Rossi*

the real dangers horses in black neighborhoods face (The Reverend), Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:10 (fifteen years ago)

I wish the Democratic Party would get a figurehead who would go into G.G. Allin fits of rage during press conferences....

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:11 (fifteen years ago)

but anyway, if she doesn't go EXTREMELY HARD in that video, I don't know what she does

the real dangers horses in black neighborhoods face (The Reverend), Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:11 (fifteen years ago)

i think you were right in reporting her going in - hell that was a breaking and entering

k3vin k., Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:17 (fifteen years ago)

aw her rhetoric is good but she barely raises her voice - i was expecting pyrotechnics

LiveJournal (acoleuthic), Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:26 (fifteen years ago)

I know I was disappointed. I was hoping for a "NOW YOU'VE UNLEASHED THE FUCKING FURY!" :(

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:27 (fifteen years ago)

she went harder the first time imo

harshbuzz to my chilt-on (zvookster), Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:47 (fifteen years ago)

it's the cold fury that does it tbrr

the real dangers horses in black neighborhoods face (The Reverend), Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:51 (fifteen years ago)

so do these attorney generals and other politicians actually think they have a shot at winning these lawsuits? If so, who the fuck is giving them legal advice?

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:52 (fifteen years ago)

who cares? We like lawsuits!

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:55 (fifteen years ago)

according to a TPM breakdown someone posted above, they do have a shot based on the commerce clause, but not much of one.

harshbuzz to my chilt-on (zvookster), Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:56 (fifteen years ago)

there are some days when i wish I could SimCity certain sections of the USA....

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:58 (fifteen years ago)

ie, sending dinosaurs through alabama

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 25 March 2010 00:58 (fifteen years ago)

The AG of Michigan is doing this b/c he's running for Governor, up against the sitting Democratic one

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Thursday, 25 March 2010 01:22 (fifteen years ago)

When your name is Mike Cox, you do a lot of overcompensating for years of schoolyard bullying. I think only Mike Hunt is worse.

ô_o (Nicole), Thursday, 25 March 2010 02:45 (fifteen years ago)

Obama found VP's effing gaffe hilarious highlight of historic day

According to the Vice President of the United States, getting caught saying the F-bomb in the White House on a live mic on national TV was very funny. According to the vice president, President Obama agreed the cursing was not only funny but was the historic day's highlight. Biden said the president was even memorializing the moment with a T-shirt bearing the funny F-phrase.

According to the vice president, during Wednesday morning's presidential briefing, the president said, "You know what the best thing about yesterday was? Joe’s comment."

(Apparently Biden said at this fundraiser that they were trying to get Obama a "it's a big f***ing deal" tshirt for the next morning's briefing. What I love is.. you still can't tell if Obama actually thinks Biden is funny, or if Obama is actually kind of pissed, but Biden is so oblivious that he's all, see guys, I told you, it was hilarious!)

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Thursday, 25 March 2010 05:18 (fifteen years ago)

it doesn't seem like obama has the best sense of humor imo

J0rdan S., Thursday, 25 March 2010 05:19 (fifteen years ago)

Biden is so oblivious that he's all, see guys, I told you, it was hilarious!

best case scenario = this happens and Biden starts 'accidentally' swearing into mikes in front of Obama whenever he has a chance

I DIED, Thursday, 25 March 2010 05:20 (fifteen years ago)

it doesn't seem like obama has the best sense of humor imo

comes & goes with the situ, probably

http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/11/06/the-best-of-newsweek-s-top-secret-election-project-vols-ii-iii-and-iv.aspx

"That's an interesting belt buckle," he said to Michelle, mischievously. She feigned offense and said, "I am interesting, next to you. Surprise, surprise, a blue suit, a white shirt and a tie." Obama grinned and bent down until he was almost at eye level with her waist. He jabbed a playful finger toward her belt buckle, and let loose his inner nerd. "The lithium crystals! Beam me up, Scotty!" Obama squeaked, laughing at his own lame joke as Michelle rolled her eyes.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Thursday, 25 March 2010 05:23 (fifteen years ago)

haha

J0rdan S., Thursday, 25 March 2010 05:25 (fifteen years ago)

this is not a humorless man:

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/d/w/2/obama-lightsabe-pic2.jpg

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Thursday, 25 March 2010 05:28 (fifteen years ago)

Are Presidents known for having great senses of humor? It's not like Obama is gonna be the type of guy that goes to karaoke night and performs Onyx's "Slam"

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 25 March 2010 05:32 (fifteen years ago)

http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2008/12/11/PH2008121101980.jpg

from the 2004 senate campaign, marching with the Lawn Rangers

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Thursday, 25 March 2010 05:38 (fifteen years ago)

hahaaaaaaaaaaa what the fuck is happening i love this

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Thursday, 25 March 2010 05:39 (fifteen years ago)

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/sleuth/2008/12/_perhaps_the_most_famous.html

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Thursday, 25 March 2010 05:40 (fifteen years ago)

He seems much younger in that pic.
xpost

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Thursday, 25 March 2010 05:40 (fifteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawn_Rangers

The Lawn Rangers are a "precision lawn mower drill team" from Arcola, Illinois.

Founded in 1980 by a group of men from Arcola, Illinois, the Lawn Rangers are the first of their kind. Two of the men, Pat Monahan and John O'Halloran, decided that they wanted to be in their hometown parade, the annual Broom Corn Festival parade, so they started to think about what skills they possessed. After deciding that they didn't have any, their wives told them that the only common skill they had was for mowing the lawn. Since Pat Monahan was part owner of the Thomas Monahan Broom Company, they decided to push lawn mowers and toss brooms in the parade. They still needed a name for what they were doing. Fortunately, Clayton Moore, the original Lone Ranger was the Grand Marshall of that year's Broom Corn Parade. It was destiny that they became the World Famous "Lawn Rangers". Over the years the Lawn Rangers have lived life by their motto: You're only young once, but you can always be immature.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Thursday, 25 March 2010 05:41 (fifteen years ago)

I predict an onstage jam with They Might Be Giants at some point during his presidency.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 25 March 2010 05:43 (fifteen years ago)

see, obama is funny! i have the impression he has a very dry, deadpan sense of humor sometimes. when not being goofy.

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Thursday, 25 March 2010 05:45 (fifteen years ago)

I'm waiting for Barack to begin his next meeting with Citigroup by saying "Bitch bettah have my money"....

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 25 March 2010 05:47 (fifteen years ago)

Pawlenty also had a few words to offer on the passage of Obamacare. "The Democrats are advancing a bill that's bad for the country," he says. "It's another example of the federal government taking over programs. The federal government is now acting like General Motors in the 1970s — they want to create big, centralized bureaucracies. [The GOP] is offering solutions that are like the Apple iPhone, with the consumers in charge. It's a very different vision."

caek, Thursday, 25 March 2010 09:38 (fifteen years ago)

AAAAAAAAAAAGHHHHHHHH

Fuck off, Timmy, before you totally ruin my home state. Preferably via I-94 bridge...

suzy, Thursday, 25 March 2010 09:43 (fifteen years ago)

no way he did not just say that.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 25 March 2010 10:02 (fifteen years ago)

I only wish that MN expats could have had an opportunity to vote that fucker out (we can't vote for state offices, just fed).

suzy, Thursday, 25 March 2010 10:12 (fifteen years ago)

Are Presidents known for having great senses of humor?

Uh, Nixon.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 12:43 (fifteen years ago)

My fellow Americans, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Russia forever. We begin bombing in five minutes.

max, Thursday, 25 March 2010 12:53 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoPu1UIBkBc

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 12:55 (fifteen years ago)

Ach, the bombing joke went down *really well* in the high school Soviet Studies class I was in at the time.

suzy, Thursday, 25 March 2010 12:56 (fifteen years ago)

Love how Mondale looks like he's about to burst into tears.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 12:57 (fifteen years ago)

I'd be tearful if I'd been pwned by Captain Dementia's team of writers too. Mondale's a fundamentally decent man and always has been.

suzy, Thursday, 25 March 2010 13:01 (fifteen years ago)

Reagan came up with the line himself, actually.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 13:05 (fifteen years ago)

Sorry but I refuse to believe that cipher had an original thought in his head.

suzy, Thursday, 25 March 2010 13:06 (fifteen years ago)

Mondale: too decent to be a politician.

queen frostine (Eric H.), Thursday, 25 March 2010 13:09 (fifteen years ago)

Mondale is the only najor party prez candidate I've ever voted for in the general election. And I regret it: he's a hack.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 25 March 2010 13:38 (fifteen years ago)

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_53oMB4-fxXM/SVZZdJntnPI/AAAAAAAAAAM/vXEtrdBFtqI/s1600-R/cookie.gif

there you go

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Thursday, 25 March 2010 13:39 (fifteen years ago)

Morbs, seriously, you're really overdoing it on IDing hacks, so could you cut it out unless you can cite an example of what makes a hack beyond 'lives in DC'?

suzy, Thursday, 25 March 2010 13:43 (fifteen years ago)

Mondale is rather obviously a hack though, but to be fair, anyone going up against Reagan in '84 was going to get annihilated.

Conyers and Feingold = not hacks.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 13:54 (fifteen years ago)

in Mondale's case, Exhibit A in '84 was his final-debate outburst 'Hell NO, I won't share Star Wars technology w/ the Soviets!' Trying to out-hawk RWR; that should've been my biggest hint.

But yes, in the era of mega-fundraising, all major-party prez nominations go to hacks (or slick marionettees, in a few cases).

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:00 (fifteen years ago)

(Fritz was MiniHumphrey)

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:01 (fifteen years ago)

For all the flak Kerry got in '04, he was still the best losing candidate the Dems proffered in years.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:04 (fifteen years ago)

I deserve a fucking cookie as much as anybody btw

make with the cookies you assholes

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:04 (fifteen years ago)

(lol future poll idea)

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:04 (fifteen years ago)

Yea, yea,yeah and Morbs has been voting for Ralph Nader ever since...

Meanwhile...

Senate Republicans have successfully identified two minor violations of reconciliation rules in the final piece of the health-care package. The violations will force the Senate to change the reconciliation bill and ship it to the House of Representatives for final passage.

Oh no... But they insist it's no big deal


But Democratic leaders said the provisions that will be struck -- from the part of the bill dealing with Pell Grants for college students -- do not significantly affect the student loan program or the health-care bill overall.

The corrected legislation most likely will not be subjected to additional challenges when it is sent back to the House, Democratic staffers said, and is expected to receive final approval before the weekend.

"The parliamentarian struck two minor provisions tonight from in the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act. But this bill's passage in the Senate is a big win for the American people," said Jim Manley, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (Nev.).

For much of Wednesday and into Thursday morning, Senate Republicans offered dozens of amendments to the bill President Obama signed into law Tuesday. Their goal was to force the legislation that will launch an overhaul of the nation's health-care system. back to the House for another vote. But when the Senate began voting shortly after 5 p.m., all 29 amendments were easily rejected.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/25/AR2010032500006.html?hpid=topnews

curmudgeon, Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:05 (fifteen years ago)

nader is a hack too

max, Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)

question about the DADT revision:

i can guess that a 'first party' outing is when you out yourself. but what's a 'third party' outing? and how is it different from say, a 'second party' outing? how many ppl are involved in an outing?

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.cartoonstock.com/lowres/csl3281l.jpg

congratulations (n/a), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:09 (fifteen years ago)

really sucks that one of the provisions failing the Byrd rule was the student loan part.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:09 (fifteen years ago)

third party outing is when somebody who doesn't know any of the principals involved accidentally reveals that one of them is gay

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:10 (fifteen years ago)

sucks even more then the view is down from on top of $100K student debt

Jack traded Milky-White to the troll for a magical (remy bean), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:11 (fifteen years ago)

Thank you, Twink Will Ferrell.

Can they not keep SL help after making the adjustments people are describing?

suzy, Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:11 (fifteen years ago)

max, you need to look up "hack." Ralph isn't even a politician. (Also, I only voted for him in '96 and '00, and it didn't matter a flying fuck either time.)

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:11 (fifteen years ago)

and a 2nd party outing would be "that guy made a pass at me"?

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:12 (fifteen years ago)

really sucks that one of the provisions failing the Byrd rule was the student loan part.

― elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:09 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

is it done for sure, or does it just have to be re-worded and then voted on again in the house?

max, Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:12 (fifteen years ago)

2nd party outing is when you go dancing on both Friday and Saturday

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:13 (fifteen years ago)

Thank you, Twink Will Ferrell.

btw I think my entire life up to today was leading up to somebody saying this to me

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)

2nd party outing is when you go dancing on both Friday and Saturday

and dress like surmounter

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)

pretty sure it will be taken out -- i get the sense that they just want the reconciliation to get through and won't bother rewording that provision.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:15 (fifteen years ago)

they = house democrats

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:16 (fifteen years ago)

a little bit of research reveals that its not the student loan overhaul that ran afoul of the budgetary rules--its a section about pell grants and their relationship to the budget

max, Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:24 (fifteen years ago)

I'm kind of laughing at the concept of second-party outing of someone because wouldn't that have to be telling someone that he/she is gay? How could that lead to a discharge?

"You're gay."
"My God, you're right. I'd better leave the Army."

^^^^ does this actually happen

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:34 (fifteen years ago)

That's a pickup exchange, Dan.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:35 (fifteen years ago)

How could that lead to a discharge?

maybe I should have reworded this

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:36 (fifteen years ago)

watch it, sailor.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:37 (fifteen years ago)

you have to stand at attention before you can be discharged

Mr. Que, Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:39 (fifteen years ago)

geithner? i barely knew 'er!

max, Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:39 (fifteen years ago)

Nothing wrong with a dishonorable discharge.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)

"Conduct unbecoming?"

"...depends on how you phrase it."

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:09 (fifteen years ago)

Asshole turns out to have Asshole's Remorse, film at 11:

The man who berated and tossed dollar bills at a man with Parkinson's disease during a health care protest last week says he is remorseful and scared.
"I snapped. I absolutely snapped and I can't explain it any other way," said Chris Reichert of Victorian Village, in a Dispatch interview.

In his first comments on an incident that went viral across the Internet and was repeatedly played on cable television news shows, Reichert said he is sorry about his confrontation with Robert A. Letcher, 60, of the North Side. Letcher, a former nuclear engineer who suffers from Parkinson's, was verbally attacked as he sat before anti-health care demonstrators in front of Rep. Mary Jo Kilroy's district office last week.

"He's got every right to do what he did and some may say I did too, but what I did was shameful," Reichert said. "I haven't slept since that day."

"I made a donation (to a local Parkinson's disease group) and that starts the healing process."

Earlier this week, Reichert, 40, denied any involvement in a confrontation featured in a Dispatch video that drew an emotional response from viewers across the country.

"I wanted this to go away, but it won't and I'm paying the consequences," Reichert said.

He said he's fearful for his family after reading comments about his actions on the Internet.

"I've been looking at the web sites," he said. "People are hunting for me."

The demonstration took place just days before the House voted on health-care reform legislation, drawing hundreds of supporters and opponents. Kilroy herself condemned the action, entering a link to the video into the Congressional Record. Ohio Democrats plan to use the incident to raise money.

When Letcher sat down in front of opponents and held a sign indicating that he had Parkinson's disease, an unidentified man berated him, saying, "If you're looking for a hand-out, you're on the wrong end of town."

Reichert then stepped from the crowd, bent down, pointed a finger in Letcher's face and as he tossed a pair of dollar bills yelled, "I'll pay for this guy. Here you go. Let's start a pot, I'll pay for you. I'll decide when to give you money. Here. Here's another one."

Organizers on both sides of the debate quickly condemned the actions of Reichert and the other man, who still has not been identified. Reichert, a registered Republican, said he is not politically active. He said he heard about the rally on the radio and a neighbor invited him to attend.

"That was my first time at any political rally and I'm never going to another one," Reichert said.

"I will never ever, ever go to another one."

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)

source?

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:24 (fifteen years ago)

I have a tiny amount of sympathy for this douchebag since he seems sincerely contrite now that he's been thoroughly cornered but my overriding reaction is "SO HOW'RE THEM CONSEQUENCES FEELING?"

not really down with ppl from the Internet hunting him down tho, that sucks

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

He accused a nuclear engineer with a crippling, incurable disease of being a burden on society? The heckler is probably a used-car salesman or a golf equipment account rep or something, how much do you want to bet? Delicious.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

wow

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

politicians and sports celebrities could take a page from this guy's book

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

nice to see a dude who acted like an asshole owning up to acting like an asshole and apologizing for it

max, Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

"I've been looking at the web sites," he said. "People are hunting for me."

thing is i don't think people who would object to what he did are necessarily the type to hunt him down and, say, cut the gas supply lines to his house

Wat ho, goatee'd man? Thy skinnee jenes hath byrn'd my corneyas. (stevie), Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

^^ding

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

initial google hits show a bunch of ppl saying "I thought about tracking him down but decided 'nah, I'm not crazy'" which is kind of lol

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

One person in the comments claims that he was yelling through the entire rally.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

& if i hear one more FOX (and elsewhere) asshole compare the rhetoric, threats and outright vandalism of the teabag nation to the anti-war protesters back in '03 i'm going to fucking scream.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)

cut the gas supply lines to his house

Baggers cut Periello's bro's propane grill line on his front porch.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

Christ on a crutch do I hate "the _______ process."

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)

& if i hear one more FOX (and elsewhere) asshole compare the rhetoric, threats and outright vandalism of the teabag nation to the anti-war protesters back in '03 i'm going to fucking scream.

― Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:43 (11 minutes ago) Permalink

Yeah, I could maybe be ok with this if the message were that overheated and violent rhetoric is never acceptable, but instead what I'm hearing is more "You guys did this too, so you have no right to criticize and we are going to keep on doing it, consequences be damned!"

Moodles, Thursday, 25 March 2010 15:58 (fifteen years ago)

Rep. Eric Cantor, the number two Republican in the House of Representatives, said Thursday that a bullet had been shot through a window at his district office in Richmond, Virginia. He also said he had received threatening messages.

He said he would not publicly release the messages out of concern that doing so would only incite further violence.

He also accused Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine and Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland - a member of the Democratic House leadership - of "fanning the flames" of violence by using threats that have been made against Democratic members "as political weapons."

"Enough is enough," Cantor said. "It has to stop."

More than 10 Democrats have reported trouble since the weekend health care vote, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Maryland, told reporters on Wednesday.

Windows have been smashed at Democratic offices in at least three states, and federal agents are investigating whether a cut gas line at the home of a Virginia congressman's brother was related to the lawmaker's yes vote.

Democratic congressional leaders have demanded Republicans join them in condemning a spate of threats and vandalism that has followed Sunday's vote on a sweeping overhaul of the U.S. health care system.

J0rdan S., Thursday, 25 March 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)

He also accused Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine and Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland - a member of the Democratic House leadership - of "fanning the flames" of violence by using threats that have been made against Democratic members "as political weapons."

thank god eric cantor said something that stopped me from feeling sympathy for him

J0rdan S., Thursday, 25 March 2010 17:01 (fifteen years ago)

He said he would not publicly release the messages out of concern that doing so would only incite further violence.

who wants to bet shooter was angry Cantor didn't stop HCR bill

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 17:02 (fifteen years ago)

i'm sayin

J0rdan S., Thursday, 25 March 2010 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

do Congressfolk/Senators get bricks thrown through windows on the regular?

Mr. Que, Thursday, 25 March 2010 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

no

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 25 March 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)

The man who berated and tossed dollar bills at a man with Parkinson's disease...

Interesting. There was speculation on some wingnut sites that the whole thing was staged. "How do we know he really has Parkinson's?" "I bet that guy throwing the dollars is a Moveon.org stooge" etc.

I turn it up when I hear the banjo (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 25 March 2010 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

yeah they think the treats on dem congressmen is all faked, 'alinky tactics' etc etc

goole, Thursday, 25 March 2010 17:29 (fifteen years ago)

alinky tactics?

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 17:31 (fifteen years ago)

skiddamarink alinky link
skiddamarinkee doo

max, Thursday, 25 March 2010 17:32 (fifteen years ago)

ye, communit aboteur aul alinky

goole, Thursday, 25 March 2010 17:33 (fifteen years ago)

does cantor expect every congressman who receives a death threat or a brick through the window to just tough it out and deal with it? i have no idea how stating publicly that you've been threatened is somehow political.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

Everything is political or at least can be interpreted as such

curmudgeon, Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

Im waiting for Republicans to come out against polls showing Americans want hcr with the "You can't trust polls"/"Liberal media bias!" lines. Of course for the past 6 months polls were the word of god and the voice of the American people. Both parties are masters of doublespeak but they seem quicker to be publicly hypocritical.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:13 (fifteen years ago)

more hijkinks

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:15 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe people who hold public office should think twice about advocating public violence towards their colleagues. Wingnuts are mad at both parties these days.

Guess it's good for her that Sarah Palin doesn't have a public office. How fucking convenient.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

The coffin was from a prayer vigil, and protesters say that the coffin symbolized babies who would be aborted due to the health care law and was not a threat to Carnahan.

and just how big was this coffin? because they don't bury aborted fetuses en masse in adult coffins as far as I know

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

lifers should just stick to the gory full-color posters imo, they are less easily interpreted as death threats

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

also they should just throw aborted fetuses at congresspeople

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

no they shouldn't, what the hell

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

Dan I think yr sarcasm detector is broken

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:28 (fifteen years ago)

like our health care system.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:30 (fifteen years ago)

my terrible joke detector seems to be at 100%

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:30 (fifteen years ago)

comments on that news story alternate between "how do you know a liberal didn't do that?" and "its all imaginary, like tea partiers using racial slurs" and (rather undoing the previous posts) "this is what you get when you try to ruin america, socialists"

Wat ho, goatee'd man? Thy skinnee jenes hath byrn'd my corneyas. (stevie), Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

"we didn't do it, it didn't happen, plus, it's your fault"

not to get too theological, but the devil argues this way. or a psychotic. or a third grader.

goole, Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:36 (fifteen years ago)

always assumed that the devil was a psychotic 3rd grader

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

have you read c.s. lewis?

goole, Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

Republicans just seem to be incapable of understanding the concept of hypocrisy , Eric Cantor: hey guys i was threatened too! also its your fault cause stop using nutso teabagger threats as "political weapons".

dsb, Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

& if i hear one more FOX (and elsewhere) asshole compare the rhetoric, threats and outright vandalism of the teabag nation to the anti-war protesters back in '03 i'm going to fucking scream.

^This. Also in 03 protesters were against killing people and making America physically unsafe at home and abroad. These people mainly don't want poor people to get their money.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

also the anti-war protests were much bigger and scale, and received much less coverage

in a way it's even kind of amazing to hear Fox talking about them again

Milton Parker, Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

spent a little time last night pondering what a parent tells a kid about the healthcare bill to motivate a musical youtube protest: super depressing

egregious apostrophising (schlump), Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

/bigger -in- scale
xpost

Milton Parker, Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

yeah how can they remember what they never reported in the first place

xp

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

Ugh, Adam, you're a bro, but shit like These people mainly don't want poor people to get their money. is part of the reason America can't have any reasonable discourse anymore.

Fetchboy, Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:44 (fifteen years ago)

lol except it's true

J0rdan S., Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

I agree!

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.printculture.com/media/3/thumb_20060705-GoreBushDebate.jpg

I agree!

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:47 (fifteen years ago)

dudes in the parkinsons abuse video were basically saying exactly that

aarrissi-a-roni, Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:48 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah which part of that sentences exactly is factually incorrect?

wmlynch, Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:50 (fifteen years ago)

uh sentence.

wmlynch, Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:51 (fifteen years ago)

tbh i don't think "money" is the core issue in HRC opposition, however much it is shouted about

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:56 (fifteen years ago)

HCR, i mean. I keep doing that.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 25 March 2010 18:57 (fifteen years ago)

I think the best way to.attack Faux news would be a tv show with a Glenn Beck look-alike using the exaxt same tactics and stretching rhetoric to blast conservatives and win over liberals (I can still dream)

CaptainLorax, Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)

It seems to me that the core issues are a jumble of money, illegitimacy and bigotry.

wmlynch, Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)

But the institutional resistance to the reform is mostly concerned with money, not necessarily that it not be passed to the poor but that it should not be taken from the insurance companies (the rich), and also that as a political issue its passage will lead to less money/power for the Republican establishment.

wmlynch, Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:06 (fifteen years ago)

I gotta bug out to see some Ian Svenonius show, but yeah, sorry, I'm probably conflating this conversation a little with a FB conversation. A lot of the protestors specifically probably do have some kind of feeling of losing their "entitlement" or whatever as their main motivation. I'm just witnessing a lot of really ugly FB fights b/w family members where people boil down others' opinions to heartlessness and idiocy, which is so easy to do these days, lolRepubs, and it's totally okay to vent some of those sentiments on these boards, but the way I'm seeing that attitude bleed over into real life with some friends and family really sucks.

Fetchboy, Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

Ugh, I was just involved in an FB discussion with a couple of local PR people I know through work and various events. One dude, who is like one of the smuggest people I've ever met, and who is otherwise a pretty smart guy, actually wrote this:

There's nothing inherently wrong with polarization. It defines the sides and not all issues can be resolved by compromise. When the Democrats supported slavery and the Republicans wanted to eliminate it, the compromise was to count slaves as 3/5 of a person. Yes, it was a compromise, but it was repugnant. I'll stand by my principles of smaller government, individual liberty, limited regulation, low taxes and equality under the law and force the left to defend the opposite.

To which I responded:

John, there were no such things as Democrats or Republicans when the 3/5 compromise was inserted into our Constitution. There were Democratic-Republicans and Whigs. And the 3/5 compromise had nothing to do with "supporting slavery." It was actually a generous giveaway from non-slave states to slave states, which allowed the latter to report a larger population and therefore to achieve greater representation in the nascent House. That is, slaves were not by any measure "citizens," nor were they given any of the rights or protections of citizens, but they were counted as population for purposes of apportionment.

You're entitled to whatever political beliefs you wish to hold, but you aren't entitled to make up ahistorical nonsense in a rather transparent attempt to smear Democrats.

I've hung out with this guy at many professional and social events, and he is otherwise cool, but, I mean, where does this shit come from in people's brains? The kicker: This guy, along with another local glibertarian, hosts a politics call-in show on radio. So, see, he doesn't know anything about history -- or is willing to lie about it for political purposes -- and so the people who listen to that crap get more and more misinformed.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

wtf @ total misreading of the 3/5ths clause in the Constitution

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

I think the best way to.attack Faux news would be a tv show with a Glenn Beck look-alike using the exaxt same tactics and stretching rhetoric to blast conservatives and win over liberals (I can still dream)

― CaptainLorax, Thursday, 25 March 2010 14:03 (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

It exists it's called Hardball with Chris Matthews.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

Chris Matthews is not a liberal in the way Beck is a conservative--not even in the slightest

Mr. Que, Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:19 (fifteen years ago)

yeah matthews will pander to anyone, it doesn't really matter -- he's not like Beck at all

Violent (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

David Frum apparently given the boot by the AEI: http://www.frumforum.com/aei-says-goodbye

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

wow no tolerance at all for dissent eh

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

Ed must've missed all Matthews' 2006- early 08 swooning over McCain

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

also his utter contempt for hillary

Violent (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

well Matthews hates women in general, tbf

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

someone get Olbermann a chalkboard

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

lol

Richmond Police Investigate Cantor Building Vandalism

The Richmond Police Department is investigating an act of vandalism at the Reagan Building, 25 E. Main St., Richmond, Virginia. A first floor window was struck by a bullet at approximately 1 a.m. on Tuesday, March 23. The building, which has several tenants including an office used by Congressman Eric Cantor, was unoccupied at the time.

A Richmond Police detective was assigned to the case. A preliminary investigation shows that a bullet was fired into the air and struck the window in a downward direction, landing on the floor about a foot from the window. The round struck with enough force to break the windowpane but did not penetrate the window blinds. There was no other damage to the room, which is used occasionally for meetings by the congressman.

The Richmond Police Department is sharing information about the incident with appropriate law enforcement agencies.

At this time there are no suspects.

Posted by RPD at 12:21 PM

Violent (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:35 (fifteen years ago)

I have Morbius levels of contempt for all these clowns. I probably watch less US news output now i'm in the states than I did before I moved here.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 25 March 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

A preliminary investigation shows that a bullet was fired into the air and struck the window in a downward direction, landing on the floor about a foot from the window. The round struck with enough force to break the windowpane but did not penetrate the window blinds.

either this is a total freak accident or the work of a marksman of considerable finesse.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

democratic sniper plant

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

maybe the bullet was fired by slingshot

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.metaefficient.com/images/A4boston.jpg

"FOR PELOSI!"

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

Q: if the HCR measure starts working and the public opinion about it greatly improves (knock wood), will the the GOP regret branding it "obamacare"?

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

A: YES THEY WILL

btw, Cokie Roberts totally hates Glenn Beck:

http://www.goerie.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100323/OPINION09/303239994/-1/OPINION

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

nice job, pancakes. I've by and large refrained from inputting on FB blowups, but I feel duty-bound to call out folks who are misrepresenting the facts or cold making shit up.

btw, that guy isn't on the Tx SBOE is he?

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

Awww Cokie won't invite Beck to her house for Bloody Marys and brunch no more.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

so glad they took that principled stand to defend Fox News in 2009

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)

After Beck denounced Obama in 2009 as a "racist" with "a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture," major advertisers quit supporting him. After Beck derided the Republican Party at a meeting of Tea Party activists, conservative talk-show host Mark Levin urged Beck "to stop acting like a clown" and added, "Decide what you are, a circus clown, self-identified, or a thoughtful and wise person. It's hard to be both."

haha oh man. mark levin, ladies and gentlemen.

goole, Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

We defended Fox News when the White House attacked the network in 2009, partly because it employs many fine journalists, including several of Steve's former students. But news folks at Fox are right to be worried. At some point, Beck's fanaticism taints them all.

"They're right on the cusp of losing their image as a news organization," says Andrew Tyndall, a respected television analyst.

how big is this cusp

goole, Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:31 (fifteen years ago)

also, how wide reaching is glenn beck's taint?

Violent (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:33 (fifteen years ago)

glenn beck: serious and thoughtful rodeo clown

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

In the interest of providing more FB interaction and avoiding job-hunting, here's http://www.facebook.com/drunkdalek?v=feed&story_fbid=108861915805938&ref=mf"">what happened on mine last night.

Long story short, it started with this response to [url=http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2010/03/excellent-description-of-difference.html]a bit I'd linked to[/a]:

I disagree. I empathize with the moral desire to promote social and economic equality, I just don't think you can legislate morals. It also depends on the HOW. How would Democrats propose to legislate economic equity...through progessive taxes? That's unfair to the wealthy. Would they do it through social programs and subsidies to the poor? ...Again an UNFAIR burden on the taxpayer.

And as to the statements about Republicans, it is also unfair to say that Republican policy protects the acquisition of wealth, as this implies GREED. Rather, the conservative would champion the ABILITY to make wealth. For if opportunities are protected, rather than pocketbooks and programs, everyone has a chance at the pie.

The prop 13 seemed a little out of place. That legislation was well intentioned but misguided. Property taxes for public schools have always been weird, yes (e.g. why does my single, childless neighbor help fund my kid's schooling) but the public education system in California is a mutant zombie biker. Why is it that pet proposals ensure the success of after school programs, yet the school can't afford textbooks? This is a deeper issue than can be used to illustrate this blogger's points. Again, unfair.

and after some interactions with me and others, went to this:

You tell me to use logic and fact, then say 'this country isn't about anything' and call me names. Unproductive, sir. This country is about choice. Your choice to say what you want, worship who you want, live the way you want. This country, my good man, is most certainly about the ONE. That is why we don't have a democracy. The voice... See More of your 'greater good' is a voice that has ruined the lived of millions of people. Mao preached the greater good, Stalin preached the greater good, Hitler preached the greater good. Do not preach to me about the benefits of the greater good, while my good is being taken from me. You have your good. i have my good. THAT is what this country is about. Study your history, Jason. Then let's stop abusing Jeremy's bandwidth and go somewhere else and you can call me names when you have some facts of your own.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

damn formatting

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

also, how wide reaching is glenn beck's taint?

resist joek

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

that was the joek

Violent (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

Cokie Roberts is a total born-in-the-Beltway hoe.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

I wonder if this hangs in the West Wing:

http://www.nextreads.com/uploadedimages/000065/Cokie%20Roberts%20Photo%20(c)%20Lynn%20Goldsmith.jpg

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)

pretty sure it doesn't

Mr. Que, Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

e.g. why does my single, childless neighbor help fund my kid's schooling)

^^^most telling point here. dude cannot see the inherent interdependency of living in a society/can't see past own nose etc.

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)

xxp: WHY... SO... SERIOUS?

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)

e.g. why does my single, childless neighbor help fund my kid's schooling)

'Cause if you don't, your illiterate, unemplyed young neighbor will be more likely to burgle your house?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

Do not preach to me about the benefits of the greater good, while my good is being taken from me. You have your good. i have my good. THAT is what this country is about.

vs.

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union

collective good is right there in the first words of the Constitution

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

it's not "We the People, in order to ensure that none of us are responsible for anybody else" knowhutimean

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

Critiquing "the greater good" by spouting off how many people famous dictators killed is some strawman shit I wish would end. People use any reason to kill and have forever and will forever more. Dude needs a history lesson if the thinks otherwise.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

'Cause if you don't, your illiterate, unemplyed young neighbor will be more likely to burgle your house become a member of Congress?

fixed

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

is it even worth pointing out that Mao and Stalin, and certainly not Hitler, were very much not preaching a squishy liberal concept like "the greater good"? or that the earliest social democratic parties were at the forefront of fighting against fascism and communism? probably not.

goole, Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

Do not preach to me about the benefits of the greater good, while my good is being taken from me.

What about the good to me of killing asshats like this with impunity? It's TYRANNY that I can't rob him blind and torture him slowly.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

Thanks Shakey, I considered that, too.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

other people that preached the greater good - George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, William Penn, Roger Williams, Teddy Roosevelt, Abraham Lincoln, Richard Nixon, JFK, FDR, etc etc

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:47 (fifteen years ago)

Do not preach to me about the benefits of the greater good, while my good is being taken from me.

This points to the underlying entitlement that this mindset has, which is ironic because he seems to think entitlement of others is the problem. He feels like he is owed something and doesn't even realize it.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)

and of course, this was a guy who went to a publicly funded high school with me, went to a publicly funded university, etc.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

this is really the idea at the heart of the conservative narrative that is so problematic, this delusional worship of a completely theoretical "individual" that is somehow thoroughly divorced and insulated from any and all collective endeavors

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

and lists Libertarian Party as his fb political views

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

I don't know what thread to post this in so I'll post this here

http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r247/muppetleague/racegonewild.gif

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

who paid for the roads this guy drives on, who paid for the schools he went to, who paid to make sure the food he eats isn't poisoned/toxic, who paid to ensure the air he breathes doesn't kill him, who paid to survey the land he lives on, who paid to develop the internet he's using, who paid for ad nauseam

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:51 (fifteen years ago)

http://i39.tinypic.com/idrnt1.jpg

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)

jesus the whole thing is just fantasy. "the greater good" is the whole point of democracy -- the people being governed are the ones ultimately responsible for making the rules. not for the hell of it, but because that's the way to get the best deal for everyone.

and it's not like our health care system was this wide open frontier that has been shut down over night. medicare: redistributive and socialist. medicaid: redistributive and socialist. that's half our expense a year, right there! the tax break for employer health plans: a massive subsidy. a huge giveaway from the middle class... to itself. calling it "socialist" or "free", before reform or after, is not even wrong as scientists say. it's not even coherent enough to be a false statement.

i dunno why i'm arguing with someone's fb friend

xp aaaahhahaha

goole, Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:58 (fifteen years ago)

lol

Obama totally has a sense of humor come on

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

eff it. here's the entire exchange. Enjoy.


Me:
"...Democrats tend to believe that, in the light of our long experience with boom and bust, fiscal policy should provide social and economic equity for the American people. Republicans seem to believe that fiscal policy should protect the acquisition of wealth, however skewed the distribution of wealth may become and however small the number of citizens protected. The difference is abundantly apparent in California today, where the Democratic legacy of equitable distribution of wealth, through public education especially, but also in many other areas, was long ago sacrificed on the altar of property rights in Proposition 13."
Yesterday at 12:03pm ·

A:
I disagree. I empathize with the moral desire to promote social and economic equality, I just don't think you can legislate morals. It also depends on the HOW. How would Democrats propose to legislate economic equity...through progessive taxes? That's unfair to the wealthy. Would they do it through social programs and subsidies to the poor? ... Again an UNFAIR burden on the taxpayer.

And as to the statements about Republicans, it is also unfair to say that Republican policy protects the acquisition of wealth, as this implies GREED. Rather, the conservative would champion the ABILITY to make wealth. For if opportunities are protected, rather than pocketbooks and programs, everyone has a chance at the pie.

The prop 13 seemed a little out of place. That legislation was well intentioned but misguided. Property taxes for public schools have always been weird, yes (e.g. why does my single, childless neighbor help fund my kid's schooling) but the public education system in California is a mutant zombie biker. Why is it that pet proposals ensure the success of after school programs, yet the school can't afford textbooks? This is a deeper issue than can be used to illustrate this blogger's points. Again, unfair.
Yesterday at 1:22pm ·

Me:
It's not a matter of legislating morals, but moral principles or an ethical worldview underlines all policy. No politician is in it b/c they're thinking "Yo I'm totally evil and I'm gunna do this evil thing."

As for the policy protecting the acquisition of wealth, that's fully documented, and voiced from guys like Pat Buchanan who explicitly voice that things should be "life, liberty, & the pursuit of property."

Restructuring the tax system so that those who use public services the most and who can pay the most is not unfair at all. If the reason why you rake in millions per quarter is thanks to an interstate highway system that allows your goods to be easily transported in trucks manufactured and maintained to certain safety levels, a navy that protects your fuel and good shipments from getting raided or sunk, a court system that both protects your trademarks and enforces your contracts, a stock oversight system that ensures traders can't screw over your share price by fucking up the exchange markets, and a banking system that protects your deposits, investments, and currency, then guess what, you get to pay for that.

As for the ability to make wealth being protected, that ability is always under fire since we've had the reactionary belief in action for the last three decades that all regulatory and trust-breaking rules are inherently evil and should be destroyed. Monopolies arise and start killing off all competition, and are protected by elected types who equate financial success with moral worth. Doesn't matter that no one can get into that marketplace.
Yesterday at 1:37pm ·

A:
Though I have little use for Buchanan, he's not entirely wrong. The first draft of the Dec of Independence read "Life, Liberty, and Property." It's the pursuit part that we need to look at. If someone is on record as touting protection of the pursuit of wealth as a Republican ideal, I suppose that's their deal. I think we're on the same page here...it's thy buddy agreements protecting greedy interests that need to stop. My point is that many progressive agendas would strive to limit the ABILITY to pursue wealth...which is limiting freedom and counter to teh constitution.

As you say, " Restructuring the tax system so that those who use public services the most and who can pay the most is not unfair at all", I have to respond in pieces. Those who use a service more should certainly pay more. Yes, agreed, that's fair. But it is not fair to say that those who CAN pay more SHOULD. Nor does it work. Example, in New England recently a state with over 5,000 millionaires imposed a millionaire tax. The result? A net LOSS of tax revenue the following year, as 3,000 millionaires changed residence. If you tax more, you get less. But back to the fairness...how is it fair to punish someone for making use of the free market better than someone else? Corruption, of course, notwihstanding. Taking the examples out of speculations referencing the elite, let's look at the middle class. I made 35,000 one year. The next year I worked harder and made 55,000. My net increase: 1,400. How is that fair?
Yesterday at 2:36pm ·

JB:
Another important point that needs to be made is that the childless neighbor example is completely invalid. That person, whether they have children or not, enjoys the benefits of the education system. Maybe its because they themselves were educated by said system, or maybe its because those performing jobs and services they use were educated by it, or maybe its because our future is handled by decision makers who were educated by it. The key here is that public education is for the public good, not the good solely of those who are educated. The entire system benefits.
Yesterday at 2:42pm ·

Me:
The "higher taxes = rich people will leave" is a myth debunked when California, New York, & New Jersey raised their taxes and saw an increase in the wealthy population. Even so, population migration is a weird and multi-variable thing, and one should step cautiously when trying to ascribe simple causation to a single factor for rhetorical use.

"If you tax more, you get less" is supply-side economics that's been proven wrong every single time they've tried it, even to the point of Reagan raising certain kinds of taxes multiple times during his Administration,turning things around by the end of it.

Again, those who use the system more should be required to pay for it. We are not Bangladesh. We have a working banking and stock exchange system regulated in part by revenues generated through taxation. How is taxation a punishment for anything?

The free market as such is not an idealized thing that would have popped up in nature like a field of untended dandelion seeded by the winds. It's a constructed system, and we have constructed it and regulated it thru our (hopefully) representative government.

This system has a fee to participate in it, and as citizens, we pay a fee to be a part of civilization and avail ourselves to the infrastructure and systems we have set up. The more you employ this system, the more you pay for it

But we must be careful when internet posts get this long, as it just becomes a competition of text-dumps.
Yesterday at 7:10pm ·

SA:
A:, the case for the weathy keeping their wealth because of their ABILITY to earn wealth would suggest that the richest part of the population EARNED their wealth. This is generally untrue. With few exceptions the wealth that exists was earned by the generation or several generations before. If you take a cue from the worlds richest man, Bill Gates, he is leaving his children little of his wealth. THEY did not earn it and therefore must make their own way. Over half of his wealth has been donated to the less fortunate. I believe the rest will be donated at his death. When it comes to the top 1% who hold the top 90% of weath, it is rarely the case that they have the ABILITY to create wealth, rather thay have the drive and support of our economic system to HORDE wealth. Let's not even get started on the sports and entertainment industry and their wealth. Maybe I am just biggoted against they wealthy. :)
Yesterday at 8:24pm ·

A:
@JB. I disagree. These 'benefits' are theoretical, not practical, and their very philosophy is flawed. 'For the greater good' is something politicians throw around when they want to guilt someone out of taxes. This country is about choice, not compulsory use.
Yesterday at 9:06pm ·

A:
"...one should step cautiously when trying to ascribe simple causation to a single factor for rhetorical use." Which is pricisely what your original author did when citing Prop 13...only my use wasn't rhetorical. Was it the butterfly effect that caused the CHANGE IN RESIDENCE of 3000 millionaires the same year a millionaire tax was imposed, with a corresponding drop in tax revenue?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703976804575114241782001262.html?KEYWORDS=maryland
Yesterday at 9:18pm ·

JB:
Having an educated person provide you a service as opposed to an ignoramus is theoretically a benefit? You are either delusional or kidding. Government is about the good of everyone, not about the good of one. For the greater good has existed since before language, it has nothing to do with a political ideology. This country is not about choice, its not inherently about anything.

How is the philosophy of indirect benefit flawed? This time, use logic and fact instead of politically charged rhetoric.
Yesterday at 9:18pm ·

A:
You complained about length, so I'll break it up...

I'd like to see tax revenue data to support your claims that this is a 'myth' debunked by New York, New Jersey and California, especially seeing as these states are at the top of the insolvent list. Whereas Texas, last I checked, was operating with an 8 billion dollar surplus and NO STATE INCOME TAX.

Also, please be more specific than 'certain kinds of taxes' and turning 'things' around. Recalling without checking, the only tax Reagan raised was social security tax.

"Again, those who use the system more should be required to pay for it."

I couldn't agree more.
Yesterday at 9:19pm ·

A:
"The more you employ this system, the more you pay for it." Again, I agree. But it has to be fair to everyone. I's not up to the government to decide that joe millionaire doesn't need or deserve 40% of his earnings, and that joe poorboy should keep 90% of his. This is classism, not economic equality.
Yesterday at 9:22pm ·

JB:
Actually, that is EXACTLY the role of government representatives. Make decisions about how the government is run based on the interests of their people.
Yesterday at 9:25pm ·

A:
SA:, you're right. Perhaps I should have used the word 'opportunity' rather than 'ability'. Still, the questionable decision to leave your child unmerited wealth (which I have much scar tissue from) should still be in the hands of the parent, not the government. Wealth acquisition, wealth management, wealth retention, and wealth sharing should. be in the hand of the one who holds the wealth. Beware bias toward the wealthy. One of the things that makes this country great is the chance for a poor man, through his own hard work and industrious mind, to become wealthy.
Yesterday at 9:28pm ·

A:
@JB:. You tell me to use logic and fact, then say 'this country isn't about anything' and call me names. Unproductive, sir. This country is about choice. Your choice to say what you want, worship who you want, live the way you want. This country, my good man, is most certainly about the ONE. That is why we don't have a democracy. The voice of your 'greater good' is a voice that has ruined the lived of millions of people. Mao preached the greater good, Stalin preached the greater good, Hitler preached the greater good. Do not preach to me about the benefits of the greater good, while my good is being taken from me. You have your good. i have my good. THAT is what this country is about. Study your history, JB. Then let's stop abusing Jeremy's bandwidth and go somewhere else and you can call me names when you have some facts of your own.
Yesterday at 9:38pm ·

JB:
Maybe you dont read well. I never called you names. Go back and read it, Ill wait. I said you are either delusional or kidding. One a statement on your behavior (acting in a delusional manner), the other a possible explanation. Take your patronizing 'sirs' somewhere else. Look at your own language, you made my case. The country is NOT about choice, its not inherently about anything. It is what anyone makes of it.

And your examples are meaningless. Those people spoke of greater good while protecting the elite. That 'my good man', is exactly what your people like Reagan (who did raise taxes in 1981, 1982, 1983 AND 1984 http://www.forbes.com/2010/02/02/barack-obama-ronald-reagan-budget-taxes-opinions-contributors-rob-shapiro.html) espouse. The fact is, just because someone in the past did something bad while saying something good cannot devalue the concept.

It is we the people, not we the individually sovereign, or even we the independent citizenry. We are all in this together.
Yesterday at 9:50pm ·

Me:
At this point in the conversation, i feel the need to put this here, as it's the most germane link i would possibly give: http://bit.ly/a5W6Kq
Yesterday at 10:18pm

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Thursday, 25 March 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

anybody who defends Prop 13 is insane imho

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:00 (fifteen years ago)

(altho yes I know he's not really defending it - just threw that out there as it's something of a pet peeve of mine)

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)

President Barack Obama challenged Republicans Thursday to bring on the debate if they plan to run on a platform of repealing the health care reform bill he signed into law just two days ago.

“My attitude is: Go for it," Obama said. "If these congressmen in Washington want to come here in Iowa and tell small-business owners that they plan to take away their tax credits and essentially raise their taxes, be my guest."

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/35032.html#ixzz0jE0ZrjDe

lol

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)

Didn't we just come out ranked as tied for last in education, Shakey?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:10 (fifteen years ago)

Example, in New England recently a state with over 5,000 millionaires imposed a millionaire tax. The result? A net LOSS of tax revenue the following year, as 3,000 millionaires changed residence. If you tax more, you get less. But back to the fairness...how is it fair to punish someone for making use of the free market better than someone else? Corruption, of course, notwihstanding. Taking the examples out of speculations referencing the elite, let's look at the middle class. I made 35,000 one year. The next year I worked harder and made 55,000. My net increase: 1,400. How is that fair?

OK, the first part of this sounds like some urban myth. I've never heard of any such thing.

The last part is simply impossible unless this dude has a cocaine habit that runs into the thousands of dollars a day. $35,000 and $55,000 are both in the same goddamned tax bracket, and it isn't anywhere close to the 93% it would have to be to net a $1,400 gain on a $20,000 gross. According to the IRS, for 2010, the tax on a single taxpayer with taxable income of $25,000 is $3,336; for $55,000 it's $9,994.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

Wait, he said $35,000, not $25,000, which narrows the difference even more: $4,944 vs. $9,994. So, of his additional $20,000 income (assuming that's taxable income), $5,050 would have gone to taxes, leaving him just under $15,000. Is it possible he missed a zero?

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

You did a great job illustrating how the market uses public facilities far more than the average citizen. However I don't think you'll get very far with him. I think the big flaw in his argument is in this line:

Those who use a service more should certainly pay more. Yes, agreed, that's fair. But it is not fair to say that those who CAN pay more SHOULD. Nor does it work.

You weren't arguing that those HAVE more SHOULD, you were arguing those who USE more SHOULD. And while he agrees with your point, he brings up a whole other unrelated debate, which he spends most of the rest of the post on. He kinda ignores your initial point so I'd say keep pressing that.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:15 (fifteen years ago)

are we really discussing Facebook threads now? is that what this thread has come to?

Mr. Que, Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:16 (fifteen years ago)

cryingeagle.gif

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:18 (fifteen years ago)

Nobody's really brought up the stuff that happened today. Republicans did something and now the bill is sent back to the House for a revote tonight?

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:19 (fifteen years ago)

que otm

Violent (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:19 (fifteen years ago)

we need to discuss daria's picture some more, imo

goole, Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:19 (fifteen years ago)

yeah there was an interesting hitch -- the senate did it's FASCIST reconciliation, but there were a few things that the GOP complained about that didn't get through the parliamentarian. so the house apparently has to do its entire vote over again?

that makes me ~slightly~ nervous, but i don't hear any crazy crowing from the right about a second chance to kill it, so, maybe it really is no big deal.

goole, Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:21 (fifteen years ago)

If Dems are ramming it in, Repubs are c*ck-blocking

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:22 (fifteen years ago)

house has to do a vote on the reconciliation changes, not on the entire bill

iatee, Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:24 (fifteen years ago)

and Pelosi says the changes will be approved by the end of the day

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:26 (fifteen years ago)

so no biggie

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:26 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i did not enjoy facebook exchange

changes aren't a big deal, i agree.

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/03/map_a_guide_to_recent_vandal_attacks_on_democrats.php

someone sent Weiner some white powder, apparently

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

they really really really need to stop this shit

On CNN last night, RNC chief Michael Steele said of Nancy Pelosi: "This November, they're gonna pay. So let's start getting Nancy ready for the firing line this November."

Mr. Que, Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

Speaking of Cokie, she deserves no props for dissing Beck. As she showed during the Clinton impeachment farrago, she's obsessed with the decorum of her Village.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

love this comment on the TPM site:

Once again, liberals are playing the race card to distract from the real issue ... is the healthcare Bill Constitutional? 13 states have filed suit against it. 24 more states are contimplating some type of action. Once again, liberals are trying to make this be black or white. Look at who these 73% of Americans are who want to start over or scrap this thing (CNN poll)? They are middle America. They pay the taxes for this stuff and they are angry ... angry about what is in the Bill, angry about how the federal and state governments take 54% (fed income tax, state income tax, property tax, sales tax, taxes imbedded in products like gas and plane tickets, etc) of their incomes, angry about how Obama wants to take another 5% in taxes, angry about how their kids get no breaks while minorities and foreigners get lots of breaks

unbelievable

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:00 (fifteen years ago)

did you know 73% of America is angry middle class white people? it's true!

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:00 (fifteen years ago)

73% of middle America are racist fucktards?

Fuck it, let's just split the country down the middle and give up now.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:03 (fifteen years ago)

I just can't get over the logical disconnect of accusing people of playing the race-card and then saying something blatantly racist, its mind-boggling

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:07 (fifteen years ago)

Lots of LOLs around about this creating a hostile business environment, etc.. I enjoy asking which first-world nations don't have a minimum wage, industry regulation, progressive taxation and government-mandated healthcare.

Would be really fun to get right-wingers to just admit that they want us to be just like China.

FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT IN THE PARKING LOT! (milo z), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:10 (fifteen years ago)

sometimes it's sad when you get to a thread and stuff that it's fun to tear up and stamp on and make fun of has already been done, but wow @ (e.g. why does my single, childless neighbor help fund my kid's schooling). my single, childless neighbor who raised himself in the confines of his own seceded home from a child, foraging for foods and learning the alphabet from found books.

egregious apostrophising (schlump), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:10 (fifteen years ago)

geez why don't kids pay for their own schooling fucking leeches

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:12 (fifteen years ago)

why don't they pay taxes like everybody else!

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:12 (fifteen years ago)

I just have to throw my hands up at this point and step away from the conservatives I know and just cut off all contact. I actively try to avoid any political discussions, but its all that these fired up, misinformed idiots want to talk about. And there is absolutely no way you can discuss this using logic and rational thought, they just aren't up to it. Too emotional and crazy. For my own sanity I just have to start shutting these people out of my life for good.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:13 (fifteen years ago)

I don't have any of these people in my family - never been close to the conservative wing of my family anyway, and def. wrote them all off more or less after the Iraq War.

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

C/D: the long tradition of rugged, self-made cattlemen grazing their herds on public lands and shaking their fists toward Washington

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:16 (fifteen years ago)

You know, someone should tell these idiots they take taxes out of your paycheck if you make minimum wage.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

The Native Americans had free fucking health care before we arrived. Way to go, guys.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)

The thing is, all the Teabaggers spouting violent action are this close to being a public danger that should be removed from society. And yet doing that would "prove they were right about Nazicrats".

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:22 (fifteen years ago)

i'm not quite willing to say one side has logic & reason on their side and the other doesn't -- because hell, we all have emotional reactions that supercede our better reasoning at times. but when someone claims to want an honest debate and then proceeds to present disingenuous arguments, indignant appeals to "common sense," or outright sophistry -- then fuck 'em. i'm not socrates and i don't have the time to instruct anyone how to use logic.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:25 (fifteen years ago)

i'm not socrates and i don't have the time to instruct anyone how to use logic.

come on now, teabaggers aren't gonna take lessons from some homo

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:27 (fifteen years ago)

Now now, don't tease elmo.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:30 (fifteen years ago)

b-b-but shakey, i already have my costume and everything

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:35 (fifteen years ago)

lol

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:38 (fifteen years ago)

hahahaa

ksh, Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:40 (fifteen years ago)

to step back for a moment and survey the political landscape, its kinda unbelievable how well Obama has played the Republicans. They're in the minority, clamoring for unattainable goals (McConnell is seriously arguing that "Repeal and Replace" is their new motto, even though a repeal of HCR is gonna be essentially impossible as long as Obama's in office? WTF), making ill-advised appeals to the wingnuttiest wingnuts of their party, marginalizing themselves in a tornado of bad decisions and over-heated rhetoric... in the meantime Obama and the Democrats deliberately constructed this legislation so that the benefits will kick in just before the mid-term elections - while the painful stuff like tax increases won't go into effect until after the '12 pres election - giving them plenty of ammo to minimize presumed mid-term congressional losses. In addition, there's all this economic stuff coming down the pike - a decent financial regulatory reform bill that has been promised bipartisan support, jobs bills, the continued effects of the stimulus packages, etc. All timed to ensure the Democrats reap the maximum political advantage. He's had to accept some poor legislative compromises, largely thanks to the Senate, but otherwise when you take in the whole picture this is a stunningly disciplined political operation in action. I've never witnessed anything like it in my life.

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:52 (fifteen years ago)

phrases I'm tired of="government handout", "personal responsibility", "rectal hygiene", "love it or leave it"....

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:55 (fifteen years ago)

Sullivan sees it largely as you do, but (so far) I haven't see evidence of master puppeteering. Most of last year -- from June through GatesGate through the August recess and on and on -- felt like a nightmare. Maybe when the biographies are written in a few years.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)

i mean seriously this makes me wanna beat up Republicans and I'm someone who recognizes the violent outbursts and civil disobedience are coming from a small minority. imagine how the rabid, inflammatory liberals are going to react.

The divide between the two parties is going to reach canyon proportions. The Republican party right now=the stupid police chief from Die Hard.

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:57 (fifteen years ago)

and it angers me when the paladins from our two parties discuss "jobs" and "jobs bills" as if we can replace what was lost in the Midwest and other former industrial powerhouses. Those jobs ain't coming back, consumed by technological advances. As long as those people are unemployed and angry, popular discontent will always simmer.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:58 (fifteen years ago)

oh I think Obama had even more ambitious goals (like by now he would've moved on to the climate change bill) but given that HCR took so much time, they still managed to finesse it such that it boosted the Dems political position as much as possible.

xp

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 22:59 (fifteen years ago)

otherwise when you take in the whole picture this is a stunningly disciplined political operation in action. I've never witnessed anything like it in my life.

Josh Bolten and Karl Rove "rolling out new product" in time for the November '02 elections?

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:01 (fifteen years ago)

Those jobs ain't coming back, consumed by technological advances. As long as those people are unemployed and angry, popular discontent will always simmer.

this is true but seems to me the idea is to make NEW jobs not bring old ones back

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:01 (fifteen years ago)

Josh Bolten and Karl Rove "rolling out new product" in time for the November '02 elections?

I never really marvelled at the political operation of Rove et al given that they were handed the biggest load of free political capital EVER with 9/11. That kind of national trauma automatically ceded them so much power it was tragic.

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:03 (fifteen years ago)

shakey i know it feels like the republicans are permanently in the dumper but you know how quickly people forget things, and how fast things change

that said, the breadth and depth of this reform will touch millions of people, and the republicans have forever stamped themselves with their "no" on this - we may not remember the details - but the odor of gracelessness and juvenility that hangs around the republicans now may take awhile to dissipate - as well as their "no"

as far as the democrats go, they can live off this shit for years: "we get things done"

people respect success even when they don't agree with it

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:04 (fifteen years ago)

also I think Team Obama has played against the Republicans very well - for one thing, the GOP's current tactics are totally transparent and easily manipulated, it's like Obama's the crafty older brother and the GOP is a bratty 5 year old.

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:04 (fifteen years ago)

(er xp)

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:04 (fifteen years ago)

here we go again: http://washingtonindependent.com/80518/coburn-shoots-down-jobless-benefits-extension

(I'm getting married next week; the interaction between my British Labour family and my fiancée's Fox News-loving family is going to be fun!)

carson dial, Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:05 (fifteen years ago)

and yeah Tracer I have no delusions that this is permanent or anything - but it's going to last for at least a few election cycles, which is an eternity in politics.

I love how they're already calling Coburn's stunt "a Bunning"

xp

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:06 (fifteen years ago)

take this Coburn stunt for ex. - it's irresponsible, unpopular, and totally predictable - the losers are gonna be the GOP and the unemployed, but the Dems are gonna look like responsible, compassionate legislators.

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:07 (fifteen years ago)

OMG F U 2x ERIC CANTOR

Update: Hah.

A Richmond Police detective was assigned to the case. A preliminary investigation shows that a bullet was fired into the air and struck the window in a downward direction, landing on the floor about a foot from the window. The round struck with enough force to break the windowpane but did not penetrate the window blinds. There was no other damage to the room, which is used occasionally for meetings by the congressman.
Yep, just some health care reform-supporting enraged loony lefitst, wandering around Richmond, Virginia, firing guns in the air near buildings where the House Minority Whip has offices.

Update 2: Ok, we can stop referring to this as "Eric Cantor's office."

Eric Cantor's Richmond office is in Glen Allen, north of Richmond. This terrifying gun attack happened at an entirely different building that Cantor's direct-mail firm is located in. So this liberal shooter really did his homework, firing into the air in such a fashion that the bullet would come down and break a window in an office building that isn't actually Eric Cantor's office, but one that he occasionally takes meetings in. A lotta research went into this!

http://gawker.com/5502144/republican-totally-wants-in-on-this-violent-threat-scare-trend-updated

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:07 (fifteen years ago)

I wish to make a strudel out of Eric Cantor

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:10 (fifteen years ago)

i wish to record my concurrence with many others that despite nancy pelosi's unbelievably irritating personal manner i think she is a goddamn hero and frankly could be considered the real forbear and enabler of this thing

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:15 (fifteen years ago)

by the way. the stock market doesn't seem incredibly worried about this 'takeover of one sixth of the economy'

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:22 (fifteen years ago)

she is quite the irritant, but yeah. go her.

dems should have called this SOARING EAGLE FREEDOM CARE. maybe they could have just slipped it by.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:23 (fifteen years ago)

best speaker since rayburn, maybe best ever. very few ppl could get one hugely controversial health-care bill passed (with a public option!!), even fewer could do it twice. and the closeness of the vote margins is an indicator of her talent, i think--seems clear shes getting the most progressive legislation possible through.

if we didnt have a senate wed live in a country with a cap-and-trade law and fairly good financial regulation (and a public option).

max, Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:23 (fifteen years ago)

this is really the idea at the heart of the conservative narrative that is so problematic, this delusional worship of a completely theoretical "individual" that is somehow thoroughly divorced and insulated from any and all collective endeavors

That actually does cut to the heart of a lot of political matters: conservatives tend to ask "why is this 'society' you speak of?" while the left usually asks the same about "individuals" and their autonomy.

The reason Robert Owen, who Engels said was the father of all socialists, disapproved of all religions was because religions tended to believe that people had freedom of choice and made their own destiny, while socialism would emphasize historical inevitability and the collective or general will over individual decision making.

Likewise F.A. Hayek wrote a book on social justice where he says that society doesn't really exist outside of people's minds, and that belief in social justice "is like a belief in witchcraft," and is sociopolitical animism of the most primitive kind. It is from Hayek that Thatcher probably got the "there is no such thing as society," slogan, although it had been emphasized by right-wing intellectuals before.

http://i42.tinypic.com/ehcd2c.jpg

Cunga, Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:25 (fifteen years ago)

by the way. the stock market doesn't seem incredibly worried about this 'takeover of one sixth of the economy'

stock market also apparently excited about financial reform - and not for the reasons you would expect (ie it being full of giveaways and loopholes) - which is bizarre. apparently confidence in Wall St has eroded to the point that investors WANT tighter regulations to pass in order to shore it up and get the market going again. saw some story recently where a major banking head actually said this verbatim (I forget who it was)

xp

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:26 (fifteen years ago)

ugh Thatcher is that bitch in the grave yet

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:27 (fifteen years ago)

britain pretty stoked for the big day

caek, Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:31 (fifteen years ago)

(as long as it doesn't happen before may 6)

caek, Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:31 (fifteen years ago)

ugh Thatcher is that bitch in the grave yet

We're ready to go with the obits on this side of the pond.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:32 (fifteen years ago)

I wonder if this will ruin Cantor's career. It's pretty darn stupid.

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:34 (fifteen years ago)

David Frum fired from the AEI:

http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/republican-party/david-frum-denies-he-was-terminated-for-slamming-gop/

carson dial, Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:36 (fifteen years ago)

haha yeah.

http://capitalgainsandgames.com/blog/bruce-bartlett/1601/groupthink-right-would-make-stalin-proud

"Since, he is no longer affiliated with AEI, I feel free to say publicly something he told me in private a few months ago. He asked if I had noticed any comments by AEI "scholars" on the subject of health care reform. I said no and he said that was because they had been ordered not to speak to the media because they agreed with too much of what Obama was trying to do."

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:41 (fifteen years ago)

Of course it's not going to ruin Cantor's career. The only story you'll hear about is how his office got attacked too, so lay off those poor teabaggers.

The GOP does well at controlling those narratives - don't you remember all the raping and pillaging in the Superdome?

FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT IN THE PARKING LOT! (milo z), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:42 (fifteen years ago)

won't amount to a hill of B's

http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/todd1.jpg

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:43 (fifteen years ago)

it is the duty of ILE to come up with a vile rumor about Eric Cantor and spread it through the webcrawlers until it's believed by the general public by morning...

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:44 (fifteen years ago)

He once fucked a member of the Texas Air National Guard while listening to Arcadia's So Red The Rose.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:45 (fifteen years ago)

eric cantor got sonned by a wite kid after a aol beef

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:46 (fifteen years ago)

With his 2" penis?

FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT IN THE PARKING LOT! (milo z), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:46 (fifteen years ago)

that was an xp, but either way

FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT IN THE PARKING LOT! (milo z), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:46 (fifteen years ago)

He covered up Glen Beck's murder of a little girl in 1990. xpost

As long as those people are unemployed and angry, popular discontent will always simmer.

Not enough emphasis is placed on the fact that a lot of the angry right-wing/anti-Obama people are unemployed, or soon will be, and so their zealotry is that much more heated and unrelenting.

Cunga, Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:47 (fifteen years ago)

Eric Cantor is really half Black and half Native American, but he undergoes "Larry Bird treatment" monthly to "make himself more palatable to Southern audiences".

and he also fingerfucks armadillos...

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 25 March 2010 23:50 (fifteen years ago)

OMG, one of my friends and her husband are driving coast to coast across the US right now, and she just put this up on FB. The mind boggles.

Quote from the Opinion page of The Oklahoma Daily: "Sure, Bush and his mostly Republican congress doubled national debt in 8 years, but they did it for freedom". Hmm.. guess we're not in Massachusetts any more.

When I responded with incredulity, she said:

You should read the rest of it. Some of it goes "We cannot let Obama and the democratic parties in congress take away our bread by giving it away for free. If breadlines become a reality, the next step is Gualags".

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 26 March 2010 00:02 (fifteen years ago)

re: Cantor--

the B girl is actually a good example because it was SO stupid that even rightwingers (like Malkin) called BS.

I think this Cantor thing might be on that level.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 26 March 2010 00:07 (fifteen years ago)

"Bush and his mostly Republican congress doubled national debt in 8 years, but they did it for freedom"

fuck me. $1000 to the first teabagger who can give me a cogent explanation of what that even means.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 26 March 2010 00:14 (fifteen years ago)

i'm assuming that it has something to do w/ various wars in the middle east

Violent (J0rdan S.), Friday, 26 March 2010 00:15 (fifteen years ago)

fuck me. $1000 to the first teabagger who can give me a cogent explanation of what that even means.

They're the same asshats that thought Iraq was behind 9/11 and had nuclear missiles capable of hitting the U.S.A.

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Friday, 26 March 2010 00:21 (fifteen years ago)

Responding to any sort of political hot headedness on facebook is just asking for trouble imo.

Cunga, Friday, 26 March 2010 00:22 (fifteen years ago)

uh... guys the Daily Oklahoman is the OU student paper and the piece is clearly satirical.

COLUMN: Resist bread socialism
Daniel Reches/The Daily
Wednesday, March 24, 2010

No food is more basic, universal, plentiful and diverse as bread. It’s a hangover cure, you can dip it in soup, it can even be used it get drunk from shoe polish (please do not try this). It can be cheesy, garlicky, round or square. Bread can be made into sandwiches, pudding, bird feeders and French toast. Ketchup and cheese transform it into a pizza. You can even crack an egg in the middle of it and relive a little bit of childhood. Bread is the food of freedom, justice and the American dream!

Unfortunately, President Barack Obama, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and the ghost of Karl Marx who communicates with them on a daily basis are going to socialize bread. They are steering America towards socialism.

With the passage of health care-reform bill, the next natural step is breadlines. Breadlines, any communist’s wet dream, will rise up faster than dispensaries in California. Lots of breadlines — and they will carry tortillas and pitas and naan — how horrid.

This will drive our country further into debt. We cannot allocate any money for food subsidies. After all, we already spend hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies to sustain multimillion dollar agriculture corporations in swing states. Allowing for free bread will grow our national deficit in order to push America closer to communism.

Sure, Bush and his mostly Republican congress doubled national debt in eight years, but they did it for freedom. Medicare part D, faith based initiatives or anytime the government dealt with Halliburton was to benefit the rich, the powerful and the holy moral. Republicans used churches, corporations and hundreds of guys in suites who line their pockets with tax payer money that they got from no bid contracts to support our social system.

We cannot let Obama and the democratic majorities in congress take away our bread by giving it away for free. We have to protect bread and defend the freedoms that it brings. If breadlines become a reality, the next step is Gulags!

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Friday, 26 March 2010 00:24 (fifteen years ago)

lolololol

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 26 March 2010 00:25 (fifteen years ago)

The Daily sounds like a Marxist pamphlet circa 1931.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 26 March 2010 00:26 (fifteen years ago)

sorry, The Oklahoma Daily

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Friday, 26 March 2010 00:28 (fifteen years ago)

they were apparently doing a whole thing on bread that day

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Friday, 26 March 2010 00:28 (fifteen years ago)

i've never really paid attention to will.i.am, but i love his mashup of obama's "yes we can" with boehmer's "HELL NO YOU CAN'T"

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 26 March 2010 00:32 (fifteen years ago)

Obama to GOP on healthcare repeal: "Go for it"
By Alex Koppelman

Having signed healthcare reform into law earlier this week, President Obama's in a celebratory sort of mood. At a town hall he held at the University of Iowa Thursday -- in front of a crowd that shared his enthusiasm -- that mood was most evident in the way he talked about those who've been opposing him, and reform.

At one point, that meant going a bit off his prepared remarks to have a little fun at Republicans' expense.

"Over the last year, there's been a lot of misinformation spread about health care reform. There's been plenty of fear-mongering, plenty of overheated rhetoric," Obama said. "You turn on the news, you'll see the same folks are still shouting about there's going to be an end of the world because this bill passed. I'm not exaggerating. Leaders of the Republican Party, they called the passage of this bill 'Armageddon.' Armageddon. 'End of freedom as we know it.'"

That part was in the prepared text. But then the president went off script, even miming the actions he described:

So after I signed the bill, I looked around to see if there were any asteroids falling or some cracks opening up in the Earth. It turned out it was a nice day. Birds were chirping. Folks were strolling down the Mall. People still have their doctors.

Later, Obama directly addressed the idea of repealing healthcare reform, which has become a rallying cry for Republicans. His response to that suggestion had more than a hint of post-victory swagger to it.

"Now that they passed it -- now that we passed it, they're already promising to repeal it. They're actually going to run on a platform of repeal in November. You've been hearing that. And my attitude is: Go for it," Obama said, continuing:

If these congressmen in Washington want to come here in Iowa and tell small business owners that they plan to take away their tax credits and essentially raise their taxes, be my guest. If they want to look Lauren Gallagher in the eye and tell her they plan to take away her father's health insurance, that's their right. If they want to make Darlyne Neff pay more money for her check-ups, her mammograms, they can run on that platform. If this young man out here thinks this is a bad bill, he can run to repeal it. If they want to have that fight, we can have it. Because I don't believe that the American people are going to put the insurance industry back in the driver's seat. We've already been there. We're not going back. This country is moving forward.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 26 March 2010 00:56 (fifteen years ago)

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/B/J/3/obama-package-headline.jpg

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Friday, 26 March 2010 02:36 (fifteen years ago)

pulitzer imo

Violent (J0rdan S.), Friday, 26 March 2010 02:36 (fifteen years ago)

hahah, guys

ggreenwald RT @AlanColmes "Cong @AlanGrayson just told me he is calling for the resignation of Eric Cantor"
less than 20 seconds ago via web

grayson!

Violent (J0rdan S.), Friday, 26 March 2010 02:45 (fifteen years ago)

man that okhlahoma article isnt the best piece of writing in the world but it's so much better than what my school paper puts out it's embarassing

51ocki (k3vin k.), Friday, 26 March 2010 03:11 (fifteen years ago)

would sign up for naan lines

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Friday, 26 March 2010 04:17 (fifteen years ago)

it's a shop

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Friday, 26 March 2010 05:56 (fifteen years ago)

mccain is a goddamn irresponsible piece of shit, like a lump of mashed potato with a supercilious grin carved in it
http://tpmtv.talkingpointsmemo.com/?id=5158572

Wat ho, goatee'd man? Thy skinnee jenes hath byrn'd my corneyas. (stevie), Friday, 26 March 2010 08:54 (fifteen years ago)

can we get a republican congressman to yell "BABY KILLER!" at these insurance folks?

10-Day-Old Baby Denied Health Care Coverage

stephen juaquin (The Reverend), Friday, 26 March 2010 09:21 (fifteen years ago)

no that baby's actually been born, therefore who cares

Tracer Hand, Friday, 26 March 2010 10:51 (fifteen years ago)

the "baby killer" types are a lot more interested in pre-babies than the actual babies themselves, if we're being honest

Tracer Hand, Friday, 26 March 2010 10:52 (fifteen years ago)

not like i'm blowing anyone's minds with that - let's move on

Tracer Hand, Friday, 26 March 2010 11:08 (fifteen years ago)

so what I gathered through Sullivan and Wonkette on this Frum firing essentially boils down to the fact that Frum recently wrote a piece (http://www.frumforum.com/waterloo) criticizing the teabag hysteria and warning the GOP of their further drift into the abyss, w/r/t the long game. he was then promptly let go from his position at conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute. along comes Bruce Bartlett and drops this little tidbit:

"Since, he is no longer affiliated with AEI, I feel free to say publicly something he told me in private a few months ago. He asked if I had noticed any comments by AEI "scholars" on the subject of health care reform. I said no and he said that was because they had been ordered not to speak to the media because they agreed with too much of what Obama was trying to do." (source: http://capitalgainsandgames.com/blog/bruce-bartlett/1601/groupthink-right-would-make-stalin-proud)

now to be fair, Frum denies that his criticism of the teabag nation and their fluffers in congress had anything to do with his termination (http://capitalgainsandgames.com/blog/bruce-bartlett/1601/groupthink-right-would-make-stalin-proud), BUT it doesn't change what he had confided to Bartlett.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 26 March 2010 11:47 (fifteen years ago)

oops, last link should be http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/republican-party/david-frum-denies-he-was-terminated-for-slamming-gop/

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 26 March 2010 11:56 (fifteen years ago)

let us not forget in all this that david frum is a douchebag of everest-like proportions

Tracer Hand, Friday, 26 March 2010 12:02 (fifteen years ago)

oh fo sho

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 26 March 2010 12:06 (fifteen years ago)

http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_kzrg8pzTdN1qz863ho1_500.png

rent, Friday, 26 March 2010 12:25 (fifteen years ago)

perhaps msnbc can then enquire how americans could be so misinformed

Tracer Hand, Friday, 26 March 2010 12:27 (fifteen years ago)

well i mean if those 5's were reversed it would be worse, right? as a sliding scale it's about as good as it could be with those options.

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Friday, 26 March 2010 12:29 (fifteen years ago)

if those %'s, sorry

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Friday, 26 March 2010 12:29 (fifteen years ago)

there are only like 12 ppl left in the country who identify as republican anyway

max, Friday, 26 March 2010 12:30 (fifteen years ago)

and only how many million that vote that way regardless, huh

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Friday, 26 March 2010 12:31 (fifteen years ago)

id be pretty confident that a poll of "republicans and republican-leaning independents" would have different numbers

max, Friday, 26 March 2010 12:33 (fifteen years ago)

ustice Ruth Bader Ginsburg shot back at Senator Jim Bunning (R-Ky.), who predicted a year ago that she would "die soon."

"I am pleased to report that, contrary to Sen. Bunning's prediction, I am alive and in good health," she said in a recent speech, according to ABC News.

Last year, Ginsburg was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Bunning, speaking at a Republican dinner in Kentucky, speculated that it was "bad cancer," and that "usually, nine months is the longest that anybody would live after (being diagnosed) with pancreatic cancer."

Bunning later apologized for those remarks, saying that he hoped "she recovers quickly."

"I apologize if my comments offended Justice Ginsburg," Bunning said. "That certainly was not my intent."

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 26 March 2010 12:33 (fifteen years ago)

that 'bad cancer' is the worst imo

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Friday, 26 March 2010 12:35 (fifteen years ago)

THE ANITCHRIST????

tomofthenest, Friday, 26 March 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)

The other thing about that Harris poll is that if you ask someone directly "Is Obama the antichrist?" or "Is Obama doing what Hitler did?" they're more likely to say "yes" than if you ask them "what do you believe about Obama?" It's like, "Hey, you know what, he probably is!! Mark me down for that!!"

jam master (jaymc), Friday, 26 March 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)

anitchristnews.com

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Friday, 26 March 2010 12:43 (fifteen years ago)

I'd love it if an actual member of the Socialist Party USA wrote an op-ed or appeared on TV to enumerate all the ways in which Obama falls short of their platform.

jam master (jaymc), Friday, 26 March 2010 12:43 (fifteen years ago)

would love it if hitler and the antichrist did the same

aarrissi-a-roni, Friday, 26 March 2010 12:45 (fifteen years ago)

would really not love it if hitler came back to life

max, Friday, 26 March 2010 12:45 (fifteen years ago)

he'd be doing well to get on even a republican ticket at this stage tbh

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Friday, 26 March 2010 12:48 (fifteen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v134/tracerhand/friday-damn.gif

Tracer Hand, Friday, 26 March 2010 12:53 (fifteen years ago)

max I think we can just connect Hitler's brain in a jar to like MS Word and that should do the trick.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 26 March 2010 12:54 (fifteen years ago)

autocorrect would just make it explode within 5 mins tbh

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Friday, 26 March 2010 12:55 (fifteen years ago)

spelling suggestion: "Mean Champ?" replace/ignore/add

what else could go wrong for (onimo), Friday, 26 March 2010 12:58 (fifteen years ago)

would also like to see the age breakdown of respondents in that harris poll.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 26 March 2010 13:00 (fifteen years ago)

there was a poll on CNN.com like right after the first report surfaced about Iraq after 9/11, asking "Was Iraq responsible for 9/11?". No "maybe", just "Yes/No", and if I remember correctly, the "Yes"s won. Those polls are useless.

At least nobody's using those poll results to determine actual policy......yet

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Friday, 26 March 2010 13:06 (fifteen years ago)

eh they did in the example you just quoted?

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Friday, 26 March 2010 13:08 (fifteen years ago)

i do like how open they left the hitler question, and would be curious to see responses to a follow-up question

rent, Friday, 26 March 2010 13:11 (fifteen years ago)

@darraghmac: I sure hope the Iraq invasion wasn't based on a CNN.com poll!

"Should we use mustard gas on Iran? Yes/No"

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Friday, 26 March 2010 13:12 (fifteen years ago)

well obviously they didn't use cnn for every little operational decision like the mustard gas or whatnot. jeez.

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Friday, 26 March 2010 13:16 (fifteen years ago)

"should company D move to the left flank and take up defensive positions? you have until 17:25 to vote!"

Tracer Hand, Friday, 26 March 2010 13:20 (fifteen years ago)

Re: What's in the Air [Kathryn Jean Lopez]

An e-mail:

It’s a sad day when the President of the United States uses taxpayer dollars to travel around the country ridiculing and provoking those taxpayers with whom he disagrees, but this is what we get when the “cool” guy wins. How I long for the days of a “cowboy” President I didn’t always agree with, but always respected.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 26 March 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)

what

Tracer Hand, Friday, 26 March 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)

"cowboy President"

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Friday, 26 March 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)

why do so many fucking Americans want The Man With No Name to be president, jesus christ. Millions of voters identified with Bush because they could "have a beer with him", they don't get to criticize the Dems for the exact same thing.

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Friday, 26 March 2010 13:22 (fifteen years ago)

man the desperate lengths corner writers and readers will go to in order to convince themselves that their dislike of the president is based on "lack of respect" rather than simple bigotry is pretty hilarious/astounding

max, Friday, 26 March 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

Presidential Stud, Continued [Kathryn Jean Lopez]

That looked to me like a pefect landing, to cap off a combat war won in under a month. If the likes of Fox News Channel and NR chose the pictures that would best characterize his presidency: bullhorn at Ground Zero, in a flight suit on the deck of the Lincoln, hanging with his men.... This is one cool presidential moment. If this were a private corporation, whoever thought of it would be getting a nice raise.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 26 March 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

max otm

Wat ho, goatee'd man? Thy skinnee jenes hath byrn'd my corneyas. (stevie), Friday, 26 March 2010 13:24 (fifteen years ago)

man the desperate lengths corner writers and readers will go to in order to convince themselves that their dislike attraction to of the president Bush is based on "lack of respect" wanting to fellate him rather than simple bigotry is pretty hilarious/astounding

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 26 March 2010 13:26 (fifteen years ago)

"Why can't Black people be more like Benson??!!!!"

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Friday, 26 March 2010 13:32 (fifteen years ago)

http://i42.tinypic.com/2lm1nj4.jpg

aarrissi-a-roni, Friday, 26 March 2010 13:35 (fifteen years ago)

hahahahaha'laksdfjaoeiroweoads[ k-lo's cowboy line

Violent (J0rdan S.), Friday, 26 March 2010 13:54 (fifteen years ago)

seriously. isn't praying to/ for a Marlboro Man getting a tad embarrassing at this point???

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 26 March 2010 14:02 (fifteen years ago)

even this figment of your imagination doesn't want to be your daddy or sex u up k-lo

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 26 March 2010 14:05 (fifteen years ago)

its nancy p's birthday today

max, Friday, 26 March 2010 14:13 (fifteen years ago)

I'd love it if an actual member of the Socialist Party USA wrote an op-ed or appeared on TV to enumerate all the ways in which Obama falls short of their platform.

Perhaps if we had a non-conglomerate-media that wouldn't piss their pants at the thought of such a booking, you'd get your wish!

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 26 March 2010 14:44 (fifteen years ago)

if you guys really want to hear that stuff i have a listserv mailbox that's chockablock with it

Tracer Hand, Friday, 26 March 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)

i cant believe that more people arent talking about the you know ACTUAL socialist senator

max, Friday, 26 March 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)

it's a slippery slope from that to talking about actual facts in the world

Tracer Hand, Friday, 26 March 2010 14:48 (fifteen years ago)

lol, the actual socialist senator is younger than my dad, yet looks 10 years older than him

black, as they say, don't crack

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Friday, 26 March 2010 14:52 (fifteen years ago)

i reckon it's cos yr dad's not a stinking commie pinko actually, pinko skins takes the sun terribly

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Friday, 26 March 2010 14:54 (fifteen years ago)

ha well my dad is an old-skool Republican with a massive mancrush on Obama, so that makes some sense sense

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Friday, 26 March 2010 14:55 (fifteen years ago)

I'd love it if an actual member of the Socialist Party USA wrote an op-ed or appeared on TV to enumerate all the ways in which Obama falls short of their platform.

not the most desirable platform, obv, but Glenn Beck invited one on during the election and the guy pretty much schooled him and totally called out Palin's "socialistic" redistribution of oil revenues to Alasakan citizens during her brief tenure as gov.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 26 March 2010 14:57 (fifteen years ago)

Sanders/Ellison '12 for the socialist Muslim vote.

jam master (jaymc), Friday, 26 March 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

Bernie Sanders, the true believers say, is a phony socialist.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 26 March 2010 15:09 (fifteen years ago)

is there any other kind?

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 26 March 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)

YESSSSSS

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 26 March 2010 15:17 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/03/26/start.treaty/index.html?hpt=T1

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Friday, 26 March 2010 15:19 (fifteen years ago)

I hate to be mean but I have to think this is one of the most conspicuous successes of Clinton so far.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 26 March 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

The treaty needs to be ratified by 2/3 vote in Congress. It won't happen.

Moodles, Friday, 26 March 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

only 1675 nuclear weapons apiece?? is obama trying to destroy this country?????

Tracer Hand, Friday, 26 March 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)

Ha, that will probably be the exact argument we hear from Republicans.

Moodles, Friday, 26 March 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

The treaty needs to be ratified by 2/3 vote in Congress. It won't happen.

I disagree, haven't heard any Republicans' making noise about this to-date, and pretty much every one is down with SALT-style treaties. Anti-Russkie fervor not too big a deal these days.

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

even Reagan was into arms reduction

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

They're complete idiots if they don't.

xposts. This is the follow-up to GHWB's '91 treaty. They'll look short-sighted and partisan, espcially as this essentially separates defensive from offensive weaponry.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 26 March 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

It will be funny after McCain's claim of no further help this year, though.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 26 March 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

that goes double for when the financial regulatory reform bill passes

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

Oooohhhhh guess who has an advance copy of The Bridge? XD XD XD...

suzy, Friday, 26 March 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

you can't say these guys don't have balls

Defending his blockade on the floor today, Coburn turned to the other political stand by, placing a giant photo of an adorable little girl from Oklahoma on an easel next to him as he went on and on about how he was blocking the benefits extension for her.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/03/coburn-pulls-the-trigger-jobless-benefits-extention-blocked-by-gop.php

goole, Friday, 26 March 2010 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

alarmed_benson.jpg should be used more often in this thread

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Friday, 26 March 2010 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

little girl from Oklahoma doesn't need roads, or doctors, or unemployment benefits, or for her father/mother to have a job

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 18:13 (fifteen years ago)

sounds like oklahoma to me

iatee, Friday, 26 March 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

okay seriously... I just... I just... so the big cheerleader for windowsmashing in the name of freedom lives on government disability checks?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/25/AR2010032501722_pf.html

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Friday, 26 March 2010 18:19 (fifteen years ago)

"Roads?" Where she's going, she won't need "roads."

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Friday, 26 March 2010 18:19 (fifteen years ago)

glass houses guys, glass houses

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

^ never more apt

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Friday, 26 March 2010 18:28 (fifteen years ago)

disabled veterans in glass houses shouldn't throw bricks

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 18:29 (fifteen years ago)

police officially call Cantor 'office shooting' incident random

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Friday, 26 March 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

I'd love it if an actual member of the Socialist Party USA wrote an op-ed or appeared on TV to enumerate all the ways in which Obama falls short of their platform.

― jam master (jaymc), Friday, March 26, 2010 8:43 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

There's this, and also:

http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/189688/october-28-2008/socialist-candidate-for-president---brian-moore

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Friday, 26 March 2010 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

Get in line to Bitch-slap Nancy Pelosi

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=111660935510966&ref=nf

Basic Info

Name:Get in line to Bitch-slap Nancy Pelosi
Category:Common Interest - Self-help
Description:
Get in line to figuratively Bitch-Slap Nancy Pelosi out of office. The line "imaginary for stupid people" forms right behind me. Lets hope California will vote her out of office as soon as possible.

WARNING: Objects on monitor may be closer than they appear. Do not use this web-site use while operating heavy machinery. Use only in a well-ventilated area. Do not drink in excess the way Liberals spend our money when on this site. Avoid contact with skin. No animals were harmed making this facebook group. Thank you (read less)
Privacy Type:Open: All content is public.
Recent News

News:She is doing any dirty deed required to force this heath care disaster bill down the throats of the American citizens. Poles show 55-65% of the people who she works for don't want the bill and she couldn't care less.

http://photos-c.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs045.snc3/13295_1404617959655_1358566475_31111848_5334594_n.jpg

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Friday, 26 March 2010 18:57 (fifteen years ago)

Beck (if you can stomach it) interviewing Frank Llewellyn, NAtional Director of Democratic Socialists of America

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2XwiMA21J4

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 26 March 2010 19:01 (fifteen years ago)

http://haikuglennbeck.com/

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 26 March 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

^^ key moment starts @ 6:50

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 26 March 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

xpost

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 26 March 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

that dude is a badass imo

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Friday, 26 March 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

Poles show 55-65% of the people who she works for don't want the bill and she couldn't care less.

I hope "the people she works for" here doesn't mean voters in California's 8th congressional district, because that figure would be a ridiculous invention. Then again, I'm not sure how Poles know that much about on-the-ground opinions in the Bay Area.

jam master (jaymc), Friday, 26 March 2010 19:12 (fifteen years ago)

The line "imaginary for stupid people" forms right behind me.

so this dude is first in line then

congratulations (n/a), Friday, 26 March 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

Lets hope California will vote her out of office as soon as possible.

I thought the Republicans hated Hope...

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

it surprises me how the prevalent "rammed down our throats" is as the metaphor for the passage of healthcare. it's like they're gagging for it.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Friday, 26 March 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

That interview w Beck is pretty funny.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 26 March 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

"I bought these M&Ms!!!"

Good for you, dude.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 26 March 2010 19:49 (fifteen years ago)

okay seriously... I just... I just... so the big cheerleader for windowsmashing in the name of freedom lives on government disability checks?

Says he was a commie in his youth. It's like the old neo-cons or the "I used to be fucked up on drugs, now I'm fucked up on Jesus" people. Why do the extremists always want everything in the universe to be on their terms alone. Talk about not being able to evolve.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 26 March 2010 19:50 (fifteen years ago)

extremism and compromise don't play very nicely together

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Friday, 26 March 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

i love how after getting schooled on actual socialism and pretty much embarrassed imho, all he can do is offer up "nice tie." idiot.

bit about Palin is A++, too.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 26 March 2010 19:53 (fifteen years ago)

I just called some commenter on Yahoo the moral equivalent to a commie since they have such pat answers to everything and only speak cant only I pointed out (in response to his less than veiled racism about Obama) that at least the CPUSA was ALWAYS right about Jim Crow.

xpost

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 26 March 2010 19:55 (fifteen years ago)

Gov't-mooching window smasher blog guy apparent has been writing about starting a civil war since the mid-90s. Sucks that the sensationalism of the 24hr news cycle puts focus on these type of people while the contents of important legislation remains a mystery.

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason/2010/03/26/vanderboegh/index.html

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 26 March 2010 19:59 (fifteen years ago)

lol

"it's too bad our media focuses on sensationalist stories (btw here's another one)"

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Friday, 26 March 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

Window smasher's whole raison d'etre is a complete farce. He gets gov't checks and is insured through his wife's employer, yet furiously resists the idea that some strawman might be "ordered" to purchase insurance by the government.

How many people currently living without insurance are happy with that situation? I went without it for a couple years in my early 20s when I literally could not afford it, and just prayed that due to my youth I would stay healthy until I could findd a job that provided benefits.

I turn it up when I hear the banjo (Dan Peterson), Friday, 26 March 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

M. White - yahoo comments sections are beneath yr rhetorical skills...

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

yeah dude that's like hearing you were shopping at tj maxx or something

goole, Friday, 26 March 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

yo man don't diss TJ Maxx like that

Nhex, Friday, 26 March 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

Josh Marshall:

It would be as foolish to say where things are going based on the last week as it was to make predictions on the same basis two or three weeks before. But I hope the current sense of turnabout (whether temporary or lasting) shows people once and for all the importance and transformative impact of winning. Big fights and wins don't deplete political capital; they create it.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 26 March 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

man i was gonna put this on the lonely spengler thread, but fuck it, it deserves a place here as long as we're airing out the crazy:

Cultural Obamalypse: the Attack on the Pope
Friday, March 26, 2010, 8:39 AM
David P. Goldman

The Obamalyptic mood in the White House seems to have infected the cultural left generally. Thirty-year-old news is dragged daily into the headlines to make it appear that some dreadful truth has been dragged out of the Vatican vaults, demonstrating Pope Benedict XVI’s culpability in child abuse. It is hard to avoid the impression that the nihilists have a sense of empowerment as never before.

There’s something ugly in the air. The two central institutions of the West are the Throne of St. Peter and the Oval Office. That is not an exaggeration, for the Catholic model in Europe and the American model are the two modes of life that the West has developed. When Catholic universal empire failed with the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648, and was buried by Napoleon, the United States emerged as an alternative model; the non-ethnic nation founded on Christian principles albeit without an explicit tie to a particular Christian confession.

For the first time in history the barbarians have breached the citadel; to have Barack Obama in the White House is the cultural equivalent of electing Madonna to the papacy. America, the source of a civil religion that held together the world’s only remaining superpower, is committed to its own self-demolition. Nihilists around the world are in a triumphant mood and believe that it is time to mop up the remnants of their enemies everywhere.

9 responses in the forum | Add your response

for those not immersed in this garbage like i am ( :/ ), david p. goldman is a jewish archconservative and passionate devotee of the catholic church and ratzinger in particular. he wrote a column in asia times online under the pseudonym "spengler" after oswald spengler, the historian, 'racial theorist' and one of the intellectual forefathers of nazism. enjoy!

goole, Friday, 26 March 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)

goole, man, check out the Goole thread I revived for you.

jam master (jaymc), Friday, 26 March 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

hey goole

Mr. Que, Friday, 26 March 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

he wrote a column in asia times online under the pseudonym "spengler" after oswald spengler, the historian, 'racial theorist' and one of the intellectual forefathers of nazism

maybe it was a nod to Egon Spengler

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:FZtCfMkLaaj2RM:http://www.freewebs.com/willywill3/speng.jpg

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

"the non-ethnic nation"

lol @ this use of ethnic; it reminds me of when people talk about "ethnic" food as a separate category. Also in this column's context it's batshit.

You don't wear a vagina on your chest....think about it (Euler), Friday, 26 March 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

maybe it was a nod to Egon Spengler

Lemme guess...Gozer worshippers.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 26 March 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

Many Obamas and Pelosis knew what it was to be roasted in he depths of the Sloar that day I can tell you

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 20:46 (fifteen years ago)

Would you like some coffee, Mr. Collier?

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 26 March 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)

obamalypse
obamageddon
baracknarok

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Friday, 26 March 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bH5Eo0bn6zY&feature=player_embedded#

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 26 March 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/03/26/christian.civility.covenant/index.html?eref=rss_politics&iref=caffertyfile

I think the greatest thing about this is how dude still manages to get in a dig at Glenn Beck.

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Friday, 26 March 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

and Mormons! ooooooh burn

Mr. Que, Friday, 26 March 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)

Oook I get it. Very cute. So if I think "Barry Goldwater," Barry Goldwater will appear and destroy us all.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 26 March 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)

don't think about Rush Limbaugh!

Mr. Que, Friday, 26 March 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)

Colson said the document "wouldn't apply to Glenn Beck because we're talking about the conversation in the family of believers ... Glenn Beck is a Mormon."

ahahahahahahahaaaaaha omg

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

baracknarok

lol

Nhex, Friday, 26 March 2010 21:00 (fifteen years ago)

wtf @ that video btw

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Friday, 26 March 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I don't get it either - OK the mules are the Democrats but the public is a zebra? what?

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)

the shark/seagull thing was kind of hilarious tho

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Friday, 26 March 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)

I didn't get that far

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 21:04 (fifteen years ago)

Many Obamas and Pelosis knew what it was to be roasted in the depths of the Sloar that day, I can tell you.

The 'depths of the Sloar' repurpose guarantees a laugh, from me, every time.

suzy, Friday, 26 March 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

x-post Baracknarok!!!! I need a t-shirt, stat!

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 26 March 2010 21:08 (fifteen years ago)

http://baracknarok.blogspot.com/

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Friday, 26 March 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)

Anyone that wants to claim this country was founded on Christian values should have to tie Jesus's teachings of love and compassion to the genocide of the Native American population.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 26 March 2010 21:12 (fifteen years ago)

Anyone that wants to claim this country was founded on Christian values should have to tie Joanna Newsom's teachings of love and compassion to the genocide of the Unicorn population.

Mr. Que, Friday, 26 March 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

an open letter to conservatives

apologies if it's been posted before. i've lost track of the thread.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 26 March 2010 21:25 (fifteen years ago)

the genocide of the Unicorn population.

sad really. the last of them are hiding in trees to survive.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3041/2329905933_0328a1dffe.jpg?v=0

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 26 March 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)

"hiding"

Mr. Que, Friday, 26 March 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

shhhh! you'll blow his cover.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 26 March 2010 21:29 (fifteen years ago)

"blow"

Mr. Que, Friday, 26 March 2010 21:29 (fifteen years ago)

You can't flip out when the black president puts his feet on the presidential desk when you were silent about white presidents doing the same. Bush. Ford.

lol hadn't heard about this one

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 21:34 (fifteen years ago)

pretty sure that was covered in these very threads but maybe not!

goole, Friday, 26 March 2010 21:35 (fifteen years ago)

it was

ALLAH! *rolls on floor* (HI DERE), Friday, 26 March 2010 21:35 (fifteen years ago)

I wasn't into that video until about 2:20 when the donkeycorns started flying and I tripped out.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 26 March 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

hey these threads move fast I can't catch everything

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 21:37 (fifteen years ago)

THE RICHMOND TEA PARTY ROCKS

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 26 March 2010 21:41 (fifteen years ago)

I missed the part about the donkeyporn.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 26 March 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

so confused as to why a blatant rip of the years-old "charlie the unicorn" youtube is the chosen form for this trenchant political commentary

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Friday, 26 March 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)

You can't carry on about the evils of government spending when your family has accepted more than a quarter-million dollars in government handouts.

I think I actually disagree with this one -- one can be politically opposed to laws benefiting oneself even if one accepts the actual benefits when the laws are in force.

anatol_merklich, Friday, 26 March 2010 22:33 (fifteen years ago)

It does take some of the sting out one's argument though, no?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 26 March 2010 22:43 (fifteen years ago)

hay guyz i don't want 5 dolars of my paycheque to go to someone else's cancer treatments m'kay?

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Friday, 26 March 2010 22:44 (fifteen years ago)

yeah well I don't want $5 out of my paycheck going to blow the limbs off Iraqi children so I think we're about even

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 22:45 (fifteen years ago)

Dolars?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 26 March 2010 22:46 (fifteen years ago)

(i wuzn't being serious - people I know say things like this)

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Friday, 26 March 2010 22:46 (fifteen years ago)

It does take some of the sting out one's argument though, no?

Not really, as long as one applauds conspicuously when it's taken away.

anatol_merklich, Friday, 26 March 2010 22:50 (fifteen years ago)

"Hey look at him, he's clapping heavily at the verdict, he's OBVIOUSLY on our side!"

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Friday, 26 March 2010 22:51 (fifteen years ago)

joeks rly: but flip the sides; I see no strangeness eg in the thought of a left-leaning politician campaigning for higher tax in his own bracket etc etc

anatol_merklich, Friday, 26 March 2010 22:55 (fifteen years ago)

^^^Clinton did this iirc

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 22:55 (fifteen years ago)

victoria jackson, never stop being you

http://mediamatters.org/blog/201003260027

And guess what? I think Pitchfork is going to give it a BM. (M@tt He1ges0n), Friday, 26 March 2010 23:04 (fifteen years ago)

yeah anatol - which is why it never seemed like (and wasn't) a winning meme for democrats and left-leaning pundits to whack all the republican "hypocrites" over the head for condemning the stimulus package while at the same time accepting the money that flowed from it into their state or district. it's a perfectly consistent position to say that you think something is a colossal waste of money, but then if it happens anyway to make sure that your constituents get a piece of the pie. they're paying for it, after all, even if a lot of them don't want to.

this guy on the other hand - sorry. when you are only a functioning human being as a result of healthcare that's been handed to you by either your spouse or the government or both you do not get to go apeshit on the government trying to extend those benefits to others.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 26 March 2010 23:11 (fifteen years ago)

omg, this John King USA show. What a douchebag.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 26 March 2010 23:11 (fifteen years ago)

eh?

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 23:12 (fifteen years ago)

new favorite term: Hatriots

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 23:13 (fifteen years ago)

nice

re my first graf there, it's akin to your husband or wife going "honey, i'm buying us a new septic tank out of our joint account cause our old one's all busted and barely works" and you're like fuck off, we can deal, but they do it anyway, you're not going to refuse to use the bathroom. if anything you're going to use the hell out of it. ok the analogy sort of breaks down, disgustingly, there, but i think you get my drift

john king is such a tool, i want to pitch sizzling coals at the vast panels of his face

Tracer Hand, Friday, 26 March 2010 23:14 (fifteen years ago)

What is John King saying?

suzy, Friday, 26 March 2010 23:16 (fifteen years ago)

During the rectification of the Vuldronaii Obama came as a very large and moving Torb.

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 March 2010 23:20 (fifteen years ago)

no idea

this is such vintage victoria jackson. "And I don't want to brag, but I sort of called it before he was elected and when I was on O'Reilly and I said he was a Communist and I got a lot of hate mail, but I got some that said I was a prescient which means "a prophet."

Tracer Hand, Friday, 26 March 2010 23:26 (fifteen years ago)

holy shit. would be totally hilarious if she was pulling some long game performance art.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 26 March 2010 23:28 (fifteen years ago)

(i understand she's been a right-wing nutso for years tho)

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 26 March 2010 23:29 (fifteen years ago)

A friend-of-a-friend was an SNL cast member at the same time as Jackson. When someone asked this cast member about Jackon's "ditzy blond" schtick, the cast member let out a long, exasperated sigh and said, "She's not acting."

Tarfumes The Escape Goat, Friday, 26 March 2010 23:31 (fifteen years ago)

it's like reverse gary coleman syndrome

Tracer Hand, Friday, 26 March 2010 23:42 (fifteen years ago)

A friend-of-a-friend was an SNL cast member at the same time as Jackson. When someone asked this cast member about Jackon's "ditzy blond" schtick, the cast member let out a long, exasperated sigh and said, "She's not acting."

She said back then that she didn't pay attention to the news because it depressed her.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Saturday, 27 March 2010 02:35 (fifteen years ago)

well this is sufficiently infuriating

(CNN) -- The Marine Corps' top officer says he would want to avoid housing gay and heterosexual Marines in the same rooms on base if the ban on gays openly serving in the military is lifted.

"I would not ask our Marines to live with someone that's homosexual if we can possibly avoid it," Marine Commandant Gen. James Conway told a Web site in an interview posted Friday. "And to me that means we've got to build [barracks] that have single rooms."

Asked about the possibility of gay and straight Marines living together, Conway told the site Military.com that he would "want to preserve the right of a Marine that thinks he or she wouldn't want to do that -- and that's the overwhelming number of people that say they wouldn't like to do so."

Conway said the Marine Corps is the only branch of the armed services that houses two to a room.

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 03:27 (fifteen years ago)

hot marine sodomy

velko, Saturday, 27 March 2010 03:28 (fifteen years ago)

"mr. conway, i've seen some porn that would suggest that your soldiers wouldn't exactly mind sharing a room with a homosexual"

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 03:29 (fifteen years ago)

Marines should just worry about killing people and not about being gay

Usain Bolt Cola (Cattle Grind), Saturday, 27 March 2010 03:32 (fifteen years ago)

booming post imo

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 03:40 (fifteen years ago)

why do people seem so genuinely offended about helping other people

I Farted In Your Mouth (Cattle Grind), Saturday, 27 March 2010 03:48 (fifteen years ago)

it's a good question, I Farted In Your Mouth - what are your thoughts on it?

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 03:49 (fifteen years ago)

"I don't want MY tax dollars paying for someone else's education" -- just about every asshole I know. I dunno...think we've had self-sufficiency rammed down our throats for two many years without people realizing that people standing in the unemployment line aren't all lazy assholes who don't want jobs but also people who got laid off after 20 years of employment. "personal responsibility" my ass. You can't be whatever you want to be when you grow up, it's all up to chance!

I Farted In Your Mouth (Cattle Grind), Saturday, 27 March 2010 03:53 (fifteen years ago)

I figure with hard work and my nose to the grindstone I could someday be upper middle class. But my chances of being multimillion dollars rich through working hard is probably close to my chances at getting struck by lightning. Seems that to be truly rich by something other than dumb luck, I would have to have some kind of 'in' into that lifestyle, like a rich family member. If I wanted to start a business I would have all this red tape to go through, fees to pay, capital to come up with, not to mention the overwhelming competition in almost every market I would be facing by companies with insanely large budgets. The idea that I could enter the marketplace and work hard enough to get to the same competitive level as any of the famous corporations is a pipe dream. Maybe if I work hard enough someday I might be able to work for Lloyd C. Blankfein but there's no way in hell I could ever be in his position.

Adam Bruneau, Saturday, 27 March 2010 08:08 (fifteen years ago)

Ugh sorry that's kind of a barf of a post. I'm kinda drunk.

Adam Bruneau, Saturday, 27 March 2010 08:08 (fifteen years ago)

You're making enough sense, though.

This is wrong though: "You can't be whatever you want to be when you grow up, it's all up to chance!"

It's not up to chance. If it were up to chance, then the bootstrap boosters might have a point. It's up to your parents, your parents' friends, the children of your parents' friends, and their connections through two, maybe three levels. People tend to not move up more than a notch or two in social status for a reason, and that reason is not because they act like goons in polite society. It's because America has has class-based society.

kenan, Saturday, 27 March 2010 10:36 (fifteen years ago)

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51y0IRnwQGL.jpg

kenan, Saturday, 27 March 2010 10:38 (fifteen years ago)

i am actually mainly okay with dismissing homosexuals from the armed forces, because have you ever even thought about what it would be like if, mid-interrogation, the homosexual interpreter started flirting with the detainee? pretty sure that this is what the whole rule's set up to avoid happening: sexy questioning, laden with innuendo.

egregious apostrophising (schlump), Saturday, 27 March 2010 13:14 (fifteen years ago)

It would be the perfect form oftorture for a fundamentalist Muslim though! most of them will take kicks to the face for their beliefs, but how many would take a dick in the ass for their cause?

I Farted In Your Mouth (Cattle Grind), Saturday, 27 March 2010 13:20 (fifteen years ago)

Imagining fantasy torture for Muslims is not what ILX is for, you pillock. Seriously.

suzy, Saturday, 27 March 2010 14:09 (fifteen years ago)

Oh, right, it's for bashing Gwyneth Paltrow....

I Farted In Your Mouth (Cattle Grind), Saturday, 27 March 2010 14:19 (fifteen years ago)

(fwiw that was actually a joke stolen from a local comedian anyway, if that wasn't already obvious by the clunky setup)

I Farted In Your Mouth (Cattle Grind), Saturday, 27 March 2010 14:22 (fifteen years ago)

Way to abrogate your responsibility for one of the most offensive posts I have ever read on this board, Captain Save a Gwinnie.

suzy, Saturday, 27 March 2010 14:23 (fifteen years ago)

You are joking, right? One of the most offensive posts ever? Have you read maybe 1% of this board? There were jokes about this exact topic in a thread not even one month ago. I guess you selectively read.

I Farted In Your Mouth (Cattle Grind), Saturday, 27 March 2010 14:26 (fifteen years ago)

(and btw, the comedian was Pat Garrity, so I'm not making it up, twat)

I Farted In Your Mouth (Cattle Grind), Saturday, 27 March 2010 14:26 (fifteen years ago)

lets cool it down now ok

max, Saturday, 27 March 2010 14:28 (fifteen years ago)

sorry - moving on. Gays in the military - should be allowed, no questions asked, "don't ask don't tell" is ridiculous.

Healthccare bill - will be embraced by more of the population in years to come, right now people are getting suckered in more easily due to the languid state of affairs/heightened state of emotion due to the economy.

I Farted In Your Mouth (Cattle Grind), Saturday, 27 March 2010 14:32 (fifteen years ago)

* Play CBS Video Video Swear Off Cussing

According to a recent study, about one out of every 200 words the average person speaks is a cuss word. John Blackstone reports on a California teenager who is trying to clean up profane language.

* McKay Hatch, 17, who heads up the _No Cussing Club._

McKay Hatch, 17, who heads up the "No Cussing Club." (CBS)

* Stories
* Budget Deficit Delays No-Swearing Proposal
* The Kid Behind "Cuss-Free" Week

(CBS) When Joe Biden whispered something indiscreet in the president's ear, the president was deeply offended. The president, that is, of the "No Cussing Club."

"I was really, really disappointed that our vice president of the whole United States actually said this," McKay Hatch said.

McKay, 17, is on a mission to clean up America's language. The California teen has written and recorded songs, he's printed posters and published a book. Now he's sending the vice president a T-shirt and a Cuss Jar where Biden can pay up for every bad word - and not just a quarter.

"Maybe a hundred," McKay said.

McKay has some experience pressuring politicians, reports CBS News correspondent John Blackstone. Earlier this month he delivered Cuss Jars to lawmakers in California, pushing for the adoption of a "No Cuss Week" in the state.

"I know we're all not perfect - I've actually already put $5 in my jar," said Anthony Portantino, a California assemblyman.

There wasn't a bad word said as the resolution sailed through the Assembly.

The measure has since stalled in the state Senate.

But in several other states, old laws still on the books do make cursing a crime. The fine for foul language in Mississippi is $100, in Virginia it's up to $250. And in South Carolina swearing in public could cost $5,000 under a bill now before the state Senate.

The vice president isn't facing a steep fine, but on behalf of America's youth McKay Hatch does want an apology.

"Words have a lot of power and that was one word that obviously offends people and people don't like," McKay said.

And before he next whispers in the president's ear, Biden may want to take some advice from California.

"I think 'fudge' is a good word," Portantino said.

After all the vice president may be just a heartbeat away - from another slip of the tongue.

max, Saturday, 27 March 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)

xpost I'm REALLY not joking, and calling me a twat doesn't make me one. Rationalizing your post as lol joeks, or attributing it to some lame comic instead of owning the stupidity of *repeating it* yourself and then moving on only makes you look childish.

A lot of crass posts go down on ILX but this is the first one I've seen that gleefully referenced the anal rape of Muslims. Usually when we cover that topic we're talking about some poor victim of torture in US custody.

suzy, Saturday, 27 March 2010 14:44 (fifteen years ago)

Hahahahaaha are you KIDDING ME? and christ, do repubs commenting on this remember what Dubya famously said "off camera"?

OMG a FIGUREHEAD CUSSES! It's not like Biden was making a speech and began by saying "Check this shit out!"

RE: Kids not cussing. It's easy not to cuss when you have no responsibilities - it's hard not to shout "FUCK" when you A. lose your job, B. can't figure out where the money for your mortgage is going to come from C. Pass a bill that your party had to take major risks and pains to pass...I actually didn't say my first swear until I was 14!

Captain Trips (Cattle Grind), Saturday, 27 March 2010 14:45 (fifteen years ago)

suzy, take it to private email, or drop it. I've moved on, you do the same...

Captain Trips (Cattle Grind), Saturday, 27 March 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)

That was all I had to say on the matter, and I will never enter into a private email discussion with you.

suzy, Saturday, 27 March 2010 14:47 (fifteen years ago)

Ok, fine. For the record, Suzy, I was talking about detainees of the US military (of which many are fundamentalist Muslims). I thought this was fairly obvious being that the post directly above mine was a joke about a homosexual "flirting" with a detainee in an interrogation, and mine was a response to that. Or the fact that I referenced "kicks to the face", which I would assume the average Muslim family man doesn't experience on a daily basis.

I do realize that the wording was clunky (as I already admitted), but I certainly wasn't talking about regular average Joe Muslims. Nor would I get how you would think I was.

Now MOVING THE FUCK ALONG.....

Captain Trips (Cattle Grind), Saturday, 27 March 2010 14:51 (fifteen years ago)

cattle grind you could probably benefit from posting a little less and taking a deep breath every once in a while

51ocki (k3vin k.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

when did we get a new lj

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 27 March 2010 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

really more of a new deeznuts

max, Saturday, 27 March 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

I'm spending a cold nasty Saturday indoors reading my advance copy of the David Remnick book about Obama. Think it's out in US in two weeks. Good so far, and very good on context.

suzy, Saturday, 27 March 2010 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

pretty curious about that book, i don't really know what the approach is?, whether it's a revelatory thing or what

egregious apostrophising (schlump), Saturday, 27 March 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

Richard Wolffe's was pretty dull.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 27 March 2010 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

smh as tea partier demands smaller government, more regulation.

He blames the government for his unemployment. “Government is absolutely responsible, not because of what they did recently with the car companies, but what they’ve done since the 1980s,” he said. “The government has allowed free trade and never set up any rules.”

good job ny times: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/28/us/politics/28teaparty.html

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, jesus h christ on a pogo stick who ARE these people?

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 17:25 (fifteen years ago)

...

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

"racists, mostly"

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

I fail to see what's wrong with that guy's quote??

Tracer Hand, Saturday, 27 March 2010 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

because blaming the government for losing your job while protesting a big government is pretty stupid.

Mr. Que, Saturday, 27 March 2010 17:31 (fifteen years ago)

he's not incorrect in the quotation, but given roger's caption i assume the article also quotes him as demanding less regulation and smaller government or something

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 27 March 2010 17:32 (fifteen years ago)

I'm at the part of the book right now where Obama's friends are telling him he'd be a putz to run for Senate.

Haven't read the Wolff book but this is great so far - lots of backstory on Chicago, lots of access, lots of New Yorker-quality factoids.

suzy, Saturday, 27 March 2010 17:34 (fifteen years ago)

Dearie me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCOYJ7weFEw&feature=player_embedded

suzy, Saturday, 27 March 2010 17:37 (fifteen years ago)

from that NY Times article on teabaggers:

"“If you don’t trust the mindset or the value system of the people running the system, you can’t even look at the facts anymore,” Mr. Grimes said."

On the one hand, this guy is basically saying, "I know that what I believe is inconsistent" and that we should be really critical of him for that reason.

But on the other hand, I feel really bad for him. How degrading it must feel to admit you're unable to face the facts anymore.

You don't wear a vagina on your chest....think about it (Euler), Saturday, 27 March 2010 18:16 (fifteen years ago)

Of course, there are media-trumpeted "facts" that ... aren't. eg, PBS & NPR nodding along that the healthcare cave-in is "a big fucking deal."

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 27 March 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

I fail to see what's wrong with that guy's quote??

― Tracer Hand, Saturday, March 27, 2010

Well nothing, if he were not also loudly demanding less government. The underlying issue, I suppose, is that a lot of people really should just be holding signs saying "well I'm definitely mad about SOMETHING" and the Tea Party organizers have done a good job of finding a something for those folks to direct their rage toward.

...

But I'm really starting to come around on "racists, mostly"...

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

i thought morbius quit this thread (recently)?

caek, Saturday, 27 March 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)

The "facts" in question are that these guys demand "smaller government even as they argue that it should do more to prevent job loss or cuts to Medicare". This is inconsistent.

You don't wear a vagina on your chest....think about it (Euler), Saturday, 27 March 2010 18:51 (fifteen years ago)

nope the fact in question is that morbius is mad

max, Saturday, 27 March 2010 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

Morbius might find the tea partiers closer to his views than he'd like.

You don't wear a vagina on your chest....think about it (Euler), Saturday, 27 March 2010 18:53 (fifteen years ago)

Uh, no. Think racism is pretty much the bottom-line requirement for tea party membership. That and lack of internal Spellcheck.

suzy, Saturday, 27 March 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

The Teabaggers seem to me like a revival of the Know-Nothings.

Aimless, Saturday, 27 March 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

I think it's delusion to think it's purely racism that causes people to think that the US government is acting against their self-interest.

lube and (Euler), Saturday, 27 March 2010 19:28 (fifteen years ago)

What do Tea Partiers think of the recent Citizens United case? I'm guessing they would side with corporate free speech because it is "upholding constitutional values" and dis-empowering the government.

Since a lot of Teabaggers are out of work it is funny that they tend to choose corporate power over government power. It completely works against their interest to be anything other than an unemployed full-time Teabagger. The government didn't fire you, these corporations did.

Unless you work for the government, of course. And if that's the case and you are a teabagger then you are basically asking for a layoff.

Adam Bruneau, Saturday, 27 March 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

So you lost your home and ended up with all this free time you are now investing in being mad at the government. Wasn't the removal of government regulation the cause of you losing your house in the first place? You think if the government lets banks do whatever they want they will give you back your house without putting you into an infinite debt death spiral?

Adam Bruneau, Saturday, 27 March 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

are we not taking this opportunity to ban Cattle Grind? oh well

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)

Euler OTM

'they're a bunch of racists' feels good and is certainly correct for some
of these people but it doesn't fully explain this 'movement'

Tracer Hand, Saturday, 27 March 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

are we not taking this opportunity to ban Cattle Grind? oh well

J0rdan, you fuckin' crack me up & bring real lols & for that I salute you

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

I think it's delusion to think it's purely racism that causes people to think that the US government is acting against their self-interest.

"purely racism," no. but it's a significant undercurrent of the movement, don't you agree?

Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 27 March 2010 21:24 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe about 25 per cent of it is post-Gingrich fingers-in-ears sore-loser conservative attrition, but 75 per cent is 'taking our country back' with either sublimated or expressed racism.

suzy, Saturday, 27 March 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

live coverage on fox news of tea party rally in nevada.

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 27 March 2010 21:34 (fifteen years ago)

Harry Reid's people are serving tea and donut holes to any bagger who wants them.

suzy, Saturday, 27 March 2010 21:35 (fifteen years ago)

lol

Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 27 March 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

The donut holes, I thought, were particularly LOLZ genius.

suzy, Saturday, 27 March 2010 21:37 (fifteen years ago)

it's entirely possible that I'm giving them too much credit but...I don't think racism plays nearly as big a part in this as many people think. do you guys remember how much the 90s right hated the clintons? they had some inexplicable pure seething hatred going on - with obama it's muslim/birther conspiracy shit, but you don't get the feeling like they want to strangle the dude w/ their bare hands...they just want to discredit him.

iatee, Saturday, 27 March 2010 21:40 (fifteen years ago)

i don't think that's right at all, but w/e imo

51ocki (k3vin k.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 21:41 (fifteen years ago)

i mean i basically hate everyone tbh, i met someone yesterday who called himself a "socialist" and then brought up ron paul's website.

51ocki (k3vin k.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

which is to say that I'm willing to suggest that we've gotten to a proud moment in our country's history where somebody can be hated more for being a democratic president than for being a black president

iatee, Saturday, 27 March 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

(xp to myself)

iatee, Saturday, 27 March 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

tbaggers are really stupid but they just look dumber than your average college dem because they're a little wronger

51ocki (k3vin k.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

Hey guys, so this was the protest going on today outside the Capitol:

http://i42.tinypic.com/2ir6p7o.png
http://i44.tinypic.com/s25x7t.png
http://i43.tinypic.com/59xc0z.png

C-L, Saturday, 27 March 2010 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

That's no protest -- it's a badminton game.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 27 March 2010 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

keep your hands off my shuttlecock

iatee, Saturday, 27 March 2010 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

ts: anti-circumcision ppl vs. vaccines-cause-autism ppl

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 22:22 (fifteen years ago)

'they're a bunch of racists' feels good...

― Tracer Hand, Saturday, March 27, 2010

Disagree. It's not about feeling superior. It's about trying to find some rational explanation for this passionate identification with incoherent positions.

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 22:30 (fifteen years ago)

it's entirely possible that I'm giving them too much credit but...I don't think racism plays nearly as big a part in this as many people think. do you guys remember how much the 90s right hated the clintons? they had some inexplicable pure seething hatred going on - with obama it's muslim/birther conspiracy shit, but you don't get the feeling like they want to strangle the dude w/ their bare hands...they just want to discredit him.

fwiw i totally get the feeling they want to strangle the dude w/ their bare hands

not to mention all that muslim birther shit is about as explicitly racist as u can get without the n-word involved

i think its unwise to chalk it all up to racism but i also think its unwise to dismiss racism. or really even to separate it out.

in fact id guess that "the gov't is working against my self interest" kind of goes hand in hand with "the gov't is run by a black man" in the minds of a lot of tea baggers.

max, Saturday, 27 March 2010 22:32 (fifteen years ago)

in fact id guess that "the gov't is working against my self interest" kind of goes hand in hand with "the gov't is run by a black man" in the minds of a lot of tea baggers.

^^

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 27 March 2010 22:35 (fifteen years ago)

let's say clarence thomas was a senator and about a billion times more personable - could he be a viable republican nom for president? imo - for sure. (alt. : if condi weren't a lesbian, if jindal hadn't embarrassed himself nationally) I mean republicans fumbled themselves into michael steele how many seconds after obama was elected? yes a lot of the republican philosophy is thinly veiled racist ideas - but I think they're more than willing to let colored people enact them! in fact they get extra joy from the imaginary shield - "liberals can't criticize them - they're a minority!"

iatee, Saturday, 27 March 2010 22:49 (fifteen years ago)

that's a little like archie bunker pointing to "his black friend" as proof he isn't racist.

Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 27 March 2010 22:51 (fifteen years ago)

I dunno, I just think we're at a point where these people would feel much better w/ a black republican president in office giving rich people tax cuts and starting wars than they would w/ a white democratic president who had a strong a social welfare agenda

iatee, Saturday, 27 March 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)

i think you mean "people of color"

max, Saturday, 27 March 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)

the 'a' after strong can disappear

iatee, Saturday, 27 March 2010 23:00 (fifteen years ago)

anyway i dont think its quite as cut-and-dry as that--"racism" is a funny concept that doesnt necessarily preclude friendships with or admiration of or even support for specific people for whom you have negative feelings toward as a group

max, Saturday, 27 March 2010 23:01 (fifteen years ago)

I dunno, I just think we're at a point where these people would feel much better w/ a black republican president in office giving rich people tax cuts and starting wars than they would w/ a white democratic president who had a strong a social welfare agenda

― iatee, Saturday, March 27, 2010 6:56 PM (18 minutes ago)

that may be so, if you would support a black president who agrees with you but say racist things about one who doesn't (because he is supposedly acting like everyone else of his race, got where he is through affirmative action, is "uppity," whatever else), you're still a racist. and being against a strong social welfare agenda is wrapped up in racism too, obviously, even if a white person is in charge

harbl, Saturday, 27 March 2010 23:16 (fifteen years ago)

insert "but" after first comma

harbl, Saturday, 27 March 2010 23:17 (fifteen years ago)

I guess I agree...I mean the same thing can be said w/r/t females in office - the very same people who LOATHED hillary clinton and said all kinds of sexist shit are now wearing 'sarah palin for president' t-shirts. that doesn't make them 'not sexist' - they're more than willing to be sexist whenever the opportunity arises. but I guess my point is 'these days they hate the idea of LIBERALS/DEMOCRATS with more passion than they hate the idea of females or blacks'

iatee, Saturday, 27 March 2010 23:22 (fifteen years ago)

(and so even though these people are sexist and racist, it's not the #1 fuel for the fire. but yes, liberalism and equal rights are related and so you can't completely disassociate hating the idea of a 'liberal' and hating minorities/females.)

iatee, Saturday, 27 March 2010 23:26 (fifteen years ago)

i don't know why anyone would think florida could remain a blue-state for more than one unusual election (obama's 2008 win). yeah, it was a crucial swing-state in 2000, but i think of it as -- generally speaking -- a reliable GOP state.

obama's secret weapon in 2012 will be (a) his amazing political skills, (b) an improving economy, and (c) the clown of an opponent the GOP will likely nominate. maybe we won't need florida.

Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 27 March 2010 23:43 (fifteen years ago)

good luck to us if we do need florida.

Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 27 March 2010 23:44 (fifteen years ago)

yeah betting on (c) tbh

iatee, Saturday, 27 March 2010 23:46 (fifteen years ago)

Meanwhile, badass:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/28/us/politics/28seder.html?hp

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 27 March 2010 23:48 (fifteen years ago)

I say if there is racism fueling the Tea Party it's mostly towards what they would call "the Muslim race".

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 28 March 2010 00:12 (fifteen years ago)

sorry but a good portion of those people openly hate blacks and those of hispanic origins

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 00:15 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah no doubt. But I think the fear of Muslims overrides even that in the most extreme cases.

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 28 March 2010 00:18 (fifteen years ago)

i think you're undercrediting the garden-variety animus at work in the tea-party movement.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 00:46 (fifteen years ago)

speaking of (c), i know it's way early, but i cannot see any credible GOP theat to obama. romney, maybe, i guess? i doubt he can win the nomination. pawlent . . . zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 00:47 (fifteen years ago)

is there a non-clown GOP governor i'm not thinking of?

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 00:47 (fifteen years ago)

it's hard to gauge the GOP right now because the tea party crowd aren't going to be as powerful in two years as they are now -- romney has no shot of winning, the obama campaign would kill him -- he's a very unskilled politician, as evidenced by the fact that he pretty much had the whole GOP (esp the coulter/rush/hannity crowd) behind him in the primaries and still lost to john mccain, who had a dead political career according to most

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 00:51 (fifteen years ago)

well, romney is (a) mormon, (b) a horrendous flip-flopper when trying to appease the GOP base, (c) is, in many ways, fairly liberal to moderate, (d) has no foreign policy bona fides, a key to winning in the Daddy Party, and (e) is a little awkward.

but on the whole, i'd rather have a pres. romney than almost anyone else i can think of in the gop.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 00:53 (fifteen years ago)

romney's attempt to turn into the apple of the eye of the christian right has been hilarious & wholly ill-fitting

tim pawlenty is prob someone to watch out for, but he's another guy who is already pandering to the super-conservative base of the GOP it doesn't work for him

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 00:53 (fifteen years ago)

tim pawlenty's middle name is "boring."

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 00:54 (fifteen years ago)

the GOP is still really at odds with their general voting bloc across the country -- no one wanted to vote for giuliani or romney who were then "the party's guys" and i see the same sort of disconnect at the moment

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 00:56 (fifteen years ago)

that's true: their base hurts them, but they can't abandon it and remain viable.

i used to think -- back in 2004 or so -- that the democrats would be stuck in that spot for a long time. and yet it turned out to be the GOP that's caught in that trap.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 00:57 (fifteen years ago)

here are some names i've seen (beyond the obvious):

  • gen. patreas. but (a) not sure he's a republican, (b) no idea what his social policy views are and (c) unless there's another domestic attack, i assume the economy -- not foreign policy -- will dominate the 2012 election. but i can see patreas at least not embarrassing the party.
  • mississippi gov. haley barbour. maybe. apparently, he's crafty.
  • former florida gov. jeb bush. bring it.
  • sen. eric . . . cantor? oh please.
  • gov. rick perry. if texas is still part of the US by then, i guess. bring it.
  • rick santorum. lololololololololol. tho it is said that when santorum looks into the mirror, he sees a future president of the US smiling back at him.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:05 (fifteen years ago)

none of those people would have a chance (and i can't see patreas running at all)

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:07 (fifteen years ago)

you know about haley barbour? he's an unknown to me. i imagine he's fat and smokes cigars, but that's it.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:08 (fifteen years ago)

the best barbour could do is replicate what huckabee did in 08, but huckabee's gonna run again so that isn't very likely

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:08 (fifteen years ago)

haley barbour: the anti-obama.

i got the fat part right.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:09 (fifteen years ago)

eric cantor is the only one that's slightly intriguing to me there -- i don't think he could win, but he has name recognition, is young, has been anti-obama enough to run on that platform but has been distant enough from the tea partiers (compared to say palin) that i don't think that would totally wreck him

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:11 (fifteen years ago)

he's kind of a clown though, in general

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:12 (fifteen years ago)

lynne cheney lying in the weeds imo

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:13 (fifteen years ago)

i thought paul ryan had some momentum atm, haven't seen his stump stylee but comes off as a policy genius relative to his comrades

give me a break Crunchie (tremendoid), Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:13 (fifteen years ago)

eric cantor may be the clowniest of the clowns on that list.

and it sort of pains me to say that, since he'd be the first jewish president. we can do better.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:13 (fifteen years ago)

BRING IT LYNNE CHENEY.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:14 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, paul ryan is a good one

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:14 (fifteen years ago)

wow what a colossal mismatch between her and obama.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:14 (fifteen years ago)

you mean paul ryan of the "phase-out/privatize social security and medicare" fame? please.

he is a policy genius next to his fellow GOP leaders, tho.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:15 (fifteen years ago)

ha, she would never, ever win the nomination, i just threw it out there cuz i think there would be people clammoring for dick to run but his health makes him unelectable

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:15 (fifteen years ago)

oh and by-the-way, the glowing CBO score on ryan's budget was recently repudiated by an independent think-tank (apparently, ryan asked that CBO assume revenue projections in analyzing his budget, which distored the results)

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:18 (fifteen years ago)

you are identifying my biggest wish (that dick cheney run in 2012).

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:18 (fifteen years ago)

i think in general that the party machine likes to back state governors as opposed to congressmen

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:19 (fifteen years ago)

no enthusiasm for john boehner in 2012? we could play that will.i.am video for months.

yes we can/HELL NO YOU CAN'T.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:19 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, well, if that's true, the '12 nominee is laying low (pawlenty, jindel, barbour or -- who?)

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:20 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha jindal

i think pawlenty is a good guess

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:21 (fifteen years ago)

i mean the guy is clearly going to run, and if his big competitors are palin, romney, huckabee, i would like his chances

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:21 (fifteen years ago)

oh wait meg whitman will have fixed california by then might as well throw her in

give me a break Crunchie (tremendoid), Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:23 (fifteen years ago)

pawlenty is so unimpressive as a speaker/personality. i guess he's another guy who could just keep the party viable while they find their footing.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:24 (fifteen years ago)

have you ever seen john mccain orate?

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:24 (fifteen years ago)

sadly, yes.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:26 (fifteen years ago)

but, to be clear, mccain was also another pick-by-default, the party won't be totally embarrassed by his candidacy situations (tho the party was, by the end, pretty embarrassed by his candidacy).

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:26 (fifteen years ago)

imo they have nobody, they are going to throw out the '12 version of goldwater and wait until 2016 to run on the platform of 'ya everything is tight again, now lets focus on those abortions!' or something

butt pirates of the caribbean (m bison), Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:27 (fifteen years ago)

that's the palin scenario in '12, i imagine.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 01:27 (fifteen years ago)

From Sullivan:

"The other day I went to look at their platform for the Democratic Party for our nation. I couldn't understand any of it. I don't speak any French," - Gov. Tim Pawlenty in New Hampshire Friday.

Not this shit again

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Sunday, 28 March 2010 02:47 (fifteen years ago)

ha pawlenty is so pathetic. only thing worse than a GOPers playing at teabag is being bad at it.

goole, Sunday, 28 March 2010 04:41 (fifteen years ago)

"a GOPers" wtf

goole, Sunday, 28 March 2010 04:41 (fifteen years ago)

but, to be clear, mccain was also another pick-by-default, the party won't be totally embarrassed by his candidacy situations (tho the party was, by the end, pretty embarrassed by his candidacy).

He still got 47% of the vote, and the GOP figures they can win over more 'independents'

curmudgeon, Sunday, 28 March 2010 05:37 (fifteen years ago)

Guys, the tea party's strength is grossly overestimated by DC Villagers like Cokie Roberts. The GOP simply doesn't have numbers right now to mount any credible threat.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 March 2010 05:45 (fifteen years ago)

yes...would be interested in what the Tea Party/PUMA crossover is, since they don't seem very closely aligned to GOP interests.

would also be interested in tea party/cougar crossover but I suspect I don't wanna know

lube and (Euler), Sunday, 28 March 2010 06:04 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, the latter thought is kinda scary, and sounds like something the Fox channel will try to pitch as a reality show.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Sunday, 28 March 2010 06:16 (fifteen years ago)

pawlenty should have just skipped the middleman and said "I don't speak 'gay'"

Tracer Hand, Sunday, 28 March 2010 10:51 (fifteen years ago)

"clammoring for dick"

Tracer Hand, Sunday, 28 March 2010 10:51 (fifteen years ago)

so if Rubio gets the nom for FL gov., is there a chance in Hell of a Democratic Florida governor?

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:12 (fifteen years ago)

really, there's no chance in hell for a democratic florida governor, regardless.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)

absence extraordinary circumstances, florida is a reliably red-state imo

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)

when Palin shouts she sounds like she'd be an excellent Lucy v.o. in a Peanuts cartoon.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:16 (fifteen years ago)

sarah you got some 'splainin to do

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:24 (fifteen years ago)

oh! different lucy. apologies.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

kinda like McCain as Ricky tho

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

who's fred -- michael steele?

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

that TN dude from L&O in my opinion, Fred something

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)

In what sense is FL a "reliably red-state"? The only things it is reliably are hot, buggy, stormy, and without political center, as you'd expect from its demographics (the politics, not the rest).

lube and (Euler), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)

Florida Presidential election history

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.twolia.com/blogs/zoboxrox/files/2008/11/florida_hanging_chad_recount.jpg

NEVER FORGET

lube and (Euler), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

old people + partly southern + cubans...it's almost strange that florida isn't texas-red?

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

The Panhandle is a barren, scary place; it's basically southern Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

Cubans tend to be live-and-let-live moderates on "social" issues.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

governors dating back to '67: four republican, five democratic

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

so I would say that "Florida is a permanently red state" is probably a Rovian meme successfully implanted x3nu-style in our minds circa 2000

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

Florida Democrats = Dixiecrats.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

Bob Graham and Claude Pepper excepted, most of our major Democrats have been a sorry moderate bunch.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

old people + partly southern + cubans...it's almost strange that florida isn't texas-red?

exactly zero of these variables are necessarily or even predominantly conservative/republican btw

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

It's not useful to compare Florida to the rest of the union. It's not a state -- it's a piece of vacation land on which powerful lobbies and interests (sugar, oranges, real estate) have aggregated.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

okay john, old people and the south aren't conservative

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

Right (to J0hn xp)---I don't think the snowbirds select FL b/c they're GOP members; although I'd be interested in data on this.

lube and (Euler), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

Still the greatest Florida liberal:

http://weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/news/politics/dcblog/Claude%20Pepper.jpg

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

^ would mix a julep for that dude

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

They think they deserve not to pay much for schools (remembers this former Floridian).

lube and (Euler), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

okay john, old people and the south aren't conservative

they really aren't is the thing - people tend to mellow as they age, and the south is way more complicated than people who like to generalize about it to make themselves feel good tend to think

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)

like, name me a southern state that's passed anything remotely like Prop 8 - you can't - I've lived in California & NC, and California is way more scary reactionary than the south imo

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:44 (fifteen years ago)

Indiana too.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

I will next be defending the midwest against the bullshit people who've only flown over it tend to talk about it, so stay tuned for that

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

I think you might have a little help from the Minnesotans with that.

suzy, Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

idk guys, as a life-long southerner (TN, MS a little GA) and frequent visitor to California for work a nd play, I can;t say I agree at all... also:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Samesex_marriage_in_USA.svg

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)

yay Claude Pepper

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:49 (fifteen years ago)

that's Claude "Dr" Pepper to you

lube and (Euler), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

Or, as McCarthy called him, the Red Pepper.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

holy shit Morbs just big-upped a Democrat

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

I like the Dems of, say, '72-76

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, the scary reactionaryism just a foregone conclusion around here

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

(...before they bought into Jimmy Carter's defense boondoggles and horrid policies in Central America, Iran, etc)

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:54 (fifteen years ago)

j0hn, I know you love middle america, but as far as I'm concerned, these are the same people who are responsible for taking away abortion rights etc. it's just so absurd to defend the south (when it comes to politics) at the same time that you complain that the democrats are too moderate.

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, the scary reactionaryism just a foregone conclusion around here

California plutocrat conservatives scare me a lot more than xenophobic oldsters but ymmv I guess

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

you misspelled 'racist'

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

plutocrats

http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g128/davidbellel/david2/mike-plutocrats-2.jpg

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

teabagging everywhere else = vociferous, annoying, but politically viable (right now) entity

teabagging in the SE = just business as usual

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

yeah but iatee your view doesn't even extend into anything resembling history - you're going on the narrative from 2000-present as if it actually defined both regions. When in point of fact where did Dr. Tiller work? Kansas. Read Carole Joffe's new book iatee - a lot of what you think you know about progressive demographics & how people think by geography etc. is flat-out wrong no matter how many charts you find on the internet

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2009/7/30/US/320

QUESTION: Do you believe that Barack Obama was born in the United States of America or not?

Yes / No / Not sure
NORTHEAST 93 4 3
SOUTH 47 23 30
MIDWEST 90 6 4
WEST 87 7 6

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

is narrative from the 1960s really much better for the south?

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

vociferous, annoying, politically viable (right now) minority, rather

xxxposts to self

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

yes very good iatee, Christ I should know better than to even answer your posts on this issue if I actually want to stay engaged w/Dems & pretend they're not all would-be old-money socialites looking down their noses at the people who're from places other than their own backyards

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

teabagging in your mom is business as usual iirc

harry lame irl (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

also iatee I think I found yr sock on the cartoonists thread

UGH POOR PEOPLE, GET THEM AWAY FROM ME

― aarrissi-a-roni, Sunday, March 28, 2010 11:59 AM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

valuable new poster?

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

as a southerner I am not offended by people saying that racism/xenophobia in the South is of a different character than racism/xenophobia elsewhere in the states - the poll results iatee posted are not at all surprising

harry lame irl (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:08 (fifteen years ago)

arissa-a-roni is a regular, i assume j0hn was joking

51ocki (k3vin k.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:08 (fifteen years ago)

you want to have your cake and eat it too; you are defending the part of the country that is more than anything else responsible for forcing the democrats / political spectrum to shift to the center-right, forcing us to compromise on things like abortion rights - but you spend the rest of your time criticizing the democrats for doing, well, exactly that.

I'm willing to hate the south because I really don't like having to compromise w/ southern politicians. you like the idea of the south a lot and are willing to have some sorta cognitive dissonance when it comes to politics. I don't hate the south for being poor, I hate the south for electing people who make my life worse off. (cause I'm also poor.)

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

ah, noted.

xp: those poll results didn't surprise me at all.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

(i don't hate the south at all, btw -- like curt1s, i live in the south)

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

@ Curtis - "of a different character" would be one thing

"fuck all those assholes down there"/"sure there's some good people" is quite another breed of ugly condescension

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

we've been around this before tho - iatee is quite content in his ignorance & doesn't really look at, for example, the florida governorship rates above & there's no point arguing it

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

i'm willing to hate the south because it's too hot

mookieproof, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

fair enuf that's more sweet tea for the rest of us

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

no I just think the fact that 50%+ of the south is 'not sure' whether obama was born in america or actually believes he wasn't is more relevant than the statement "florida has had some moderate democrat governors"

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

j0hn i'd appreciate it if you'd briefly explain the thesis of that book you cited before so i could understand your point here a little better

51ocki (k3vin k.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

too much of that sweet tea and you'll catch the Type 2...shit's bad for you

Religious Embolism (WmC), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

"I dont hate it he thought, panting in the cold air, the iron New England dark: I dont. I dont! I dont hate it! I dont hate it!"

sorry, couldn't resist.

ryan, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

I don't recall him saying "fuck all those assholes down there." I think maybe you are projecting some preconceived notions of liberal elitism on dude.

xposts sweet tea is the cure for all your ills. never speak badly of it.

harry lame irl (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

(i don't hate the south at all, btw -- like curt1s, i live in the south)

― Daniel, Esq.,

Miami-Dade County /= the South.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

and I know you think I hate the south for elitist big city reasons, but no, like I said, I pretty much only dislike the south because they vote republicans and blue dawg democrats into national office and that makes my life worse. I equally hate the parts of california that do that.

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

xpost to iatee's 1st of 2 - really? you don't think chronic underfunding of education & widespread poverty might have more to do with it than All Those Bad, Bad People Down There? you're a piece of work, a couple more like you and the permanent Republican majority can finally become reality

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

no, I think racism and fundamentalist christianity have more to do with it

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

Miami-Dade County /= the South.

in fairness you can put any southern city to the left of that "does not equal" - the South is only uniform for the convenience of dismissing or boosting it

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

i hate the south because i hate anywhere that im not from

max, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

the chronic underfunding of education & widespread poverty have a lot to do with why racism & fundamentalist christianity continue to thrive in the south

harry lame irl (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:21 (fifteen years ago)

shh Curtis iatee is busy thinking people are just BORN BAD

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

college grads in the south still vote republican

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

yeah seriously! xposts

harbl, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

max where'd you grow up anyway

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

I part company from J0hn on the origins of racism, which are hugely complex and contradictory. Money and education help but don't eradicate it.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

rich people in the south still vote republican

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

rich people in the north still vote republican

harbl, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

yeah but in the north they're not those evil toothless banjo-players like the dirty evil bastards we need to get rid of harbl

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:24 (fifteen years ago)

ya it's almost like money isn't a cure for conservative worldviews

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:24 (fifteen years ago)

evil toothless banjo-players have my unyielding political support

harry lame irl (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

Money and education help but don't eradicate it.

gotta give it time Alfred! it takes generations to undo big messes!

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

i feel like you don't get how southern whites got to be racist, i dunno
not to say that northern whites aren't.

harbl, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

the only cure for conservative worldviews is sneering condescension imo

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

max where'd you grow up anyway

― Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, March 28, 2010 12:22 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

new jersey

max, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

What I have noticed in FL is that many of the people I run into on the Gulf coast are white flighters my mom's age. They really think minorities of any kind should wait to do whatever it is they need to do to be equal until some nebulous future point where they, the powerful demographic, are 'comfortable' with that. In 2007, a fiftysomething bookstore manager by my mom's place in Fort Myers Beach called me a 'little devil' for suggesting that Obama could be elected after I asked if she had the books (she did, I walked).

suzy, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

wtf j0hn, when have I ever mentioned banjo-players? (other than you.)

again and again I say my only beef w/ the south is the politics, but you'd much rather pretend like you're talking to some a stereotype of a big city elitist.

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

minus 'a'

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

Fundamentalist Christianity is a product of (southern/western states of?) America, not the cause of it's genesis.

grobravara hollaglob (dowd), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

causes of racism aside, I'm sympathetic to iatee's posts in this section of thraed

Religious Embolism (WmC), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

chicken vs egg xpost

harry lame irl (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)


and I know you think I hate the south for elitist big city reasons, but no, like I said, I pretty much only dislike the south because they vote republicans and blue dawg democrats into national office and that makes my life worse. I equally hate the parts of california that do that.

yeah dude it's just real curious how tone-setting western US GOP machinations don't seem to capture your fancy so much as kneejerk "oh those ignorant fuckers!" anti-south sentiments do. why, it's almost like you're parroting a handed-down set of assumptions about a vast region full of people with complex motivations whose problems may stem from a general & longstanding feeling of economic disenfranchisement, rather than providing a rational analysis that ends in "fuck those people"

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

I mean srsly friend subject the whole question to a little class analysis & cure yourself of a tendency that's really ugly

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

So what if iatee just said "I understand their longstanding feelings of economic disenfrachisement, but fuck those people"?

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

chicken vs egg xpost

Maybe (I don't think so, necessarily - Charismatic churches, biblical literalists, wealth based evangelicals are primarily and american phenomenon, despite the origins of such groups being european, and the groups that emigrated left larger populations behind. Of course, all of these ideas are going to have a feedback onto the social conditions, which have further encouraged such groups etc. etc. But to think of religion as the driving force of ideology rather than it's product is a pretty basic error.)

Also, j0hn OTM

grobravara hollaglob (dowd), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

So what if iatee just said "I understand their longstanding feelings of economic disenfrachisement, but fuck those people"?

he'd still be coming from a place of "everything I know about this question has zero to do with any experience of the place" so I would still say it's a shitty look

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

J0hn would you agree that the GOP's machinations for the past half-decade have largely been marketed towards already-entrenched conservative trends in Southern culture?

harry lame irl (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, in terms of its rightness & usefulness, "the dumb south" is about as valuable as "the Hollywood elite" or "this picante sauce comes from New York City"

xpost I would argue with "already entrenched" - I think the GOP's strategy is an ancient one: exploit the conservatism that tends to follow upon economic disenfranchisement, ID an "other" and hold it up as a bogeyman, rally around that every time there's a question about who gets the power

IOW exactly what iatee's doing only w/different villains

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

western US GOP machinations? I mean, if you want to somehow figure out a way to blame california, go for it. the GOP's base and leaders are all southern and there's no indication that that's going to change anytime soon.

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

In the meantime, I kinda hate these stunt trips no matter who does 'em:

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/03/28/obama.afghanistan/index.html?hpt=T1

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

haha omg j0hn it never ends. when exactly did I say "the dumb south"?

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

and if it's really down to 'economic disenfranchisement' then why the hell are successful and college-educated people in the south so conservative too?

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

^^ different element of conservatism

harry lame irl (Curt1s Stephens), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

am I at least allowed to dislike rich southern people who vote republican?

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

jesus said to love thy republicans

mookieproof, Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

and if it's really down to 'economic disenfranchisement' then why the hell are successful and college-educated people in the south so conservative too?

dude have the stones to bear out your thesis here. it's because "they're bad people," is that right - they emerge from the womb with conservative convictions intact? economic disenfranchisement is what allows conservative Xity to take hold in the first place: pie in the sky when you die, etc. once that model's in place, it takes work to break it off.

the culture resultant upon skewed economic opportunities results in entrenched political positions across generations - that's the beauty of the whole thing, from a perpetuating-the-process view. exactly like your standpoint here is a self-perpetuating rooted-in-unfounded-bias one that results in, as far as I can tell, no tangible good unless self-righteousness counts as one - and you can take it from a way-too-self-righteous dude, it doesn't.

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

And that is the last the Twink Will Ferrell has to say on the subject this morning, I meant to be reading books today and here it is 1:00.

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

I lived in the south my whole life, and have friends that have since moved up north, and they tell me after a number of years they feel like they have to constantly defend it. People hear you are from the south and it's assumed - to some degree - you're an idiot.

On the other hand I think if you've moved away from the south you are kind of looking at it through rose-tinted glasses as where you grew up. And yeah you might have had a great time in Atlanta or Asheville or Birmingham or some other city with something going for it, but most of the south is rural. Beautiful land, but yeah pretty backwards politically. And while I've never gotten shit from being a "city boy" there is definitely some political tension because of tax and representational issues.

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 28 March 2010 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

iatee I wanna try to build some bridges up in this bitch: am I understanding you correctly that you believe people in the American south are primarily conservative because of something intrinsic to the region? what is it that is intrinsic to the region that brings this conservatism about?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 28 March 2010 17:31 (fifteen years ago)

also, from that cnn bit

The trip came after what has been perhaps the most successful week of Obama's presidency

the turnaround time is amazing here imo

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 28 March 2010 17:32 (fifteen years ago)

underfunding of education & widespread poverty

i wonder.. and i don't know the south but.. back home in appalachia it's been my observation that yes this is a huge huge issue, but it isn't necessarily a correlation with voting patterns, in that the people who are suffering worst from this, if they vote at all (and a lot of them do not) are tending to vote democratic. the republicans are generally better off. not rich, but better off. aside from that, a general perception that the state and federal governments do nothing to affect your life, aside from taking your tax $$$ and sending them downstate or out of state, from where they never return.

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Sunday, 28 March 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)

to mr. d@rn:

I feel like you've successfully adopted the attitude of your adopted region - the reactionary paranoia that someone somewhere else thinks they're better than you. it's a pretty widespread american attitude yeah, but no doubt it's strongest in middle america. I haven't said anything about the south beyond "I hate the politics" because tbh the south doesn't affect my life much other than politically. again and again you try and frame it as some sort of elitism thing...that's a very convenient way of looking at things and I guess you've learned some techniques from your neighbors.

most of our arguments in political threads come down to me saying "we have to compromise w/ these moderate politicans to get anything done" and you saying "no we can't compromise our values" - well, I wish I didn't have to have my values compromised too! that's why I resent our current situation. but the burden isn't on my congresspeople or the people in my neighborhood. what can we do? donate money to democratic candidates in the south and maybe 'be less snobby'?

and I'm not sure the burden is really on the democratic party either. I don't think there's going to be anyone in the near future who could have done more than bill clinton did to appeal to a poor white southern voter; and while he got some of their votes, we're basically in the same place we were before he was president, perhaps even a worse place. the democrats don't need to change; the south needs to change.

(okay the democrats need to change in other ways, different subject...)

the culture resultant upon skewed economic opportunities results in entrenched political positions across generations

so wtf is the answer? the economic problems of the past linger on in the future w/ entrenched political positions. education and wealth were the problems...but oh no wait, the attitudes are entrenched so education and wealth actually isn't gonna solve anything?

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

iatee I wanna try to build some bridges up in this bitch: am I understanding you correctly that you believe people in the American south are primarily conservative because of something intrinsic to the region? what is it that is intrinsic to the region that brings this conservatism about?

1. fundamentalist christianity (which isn't solely due to being poor!)
2. racism
3. aforementioned 'somebody thinks they're better than me'

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 17:48 (fifteen years ago)

When you say racism is a southern thing, I would say most limited to racism against Mexicans, which is mostly economically-based. I really haven't seen much racism except for the occasional slur against people south of the border taking all your jobs/moneys/etc.

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 28 March 2010 18:29 (fifteen years ago)

Also I think by now its common knowledge that most politicians are bipartisan crooks when it comes to financial matters, so the social issues are the only ones that "really matter" when it comes down to it.

Not that I think this way but its an idea...

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 28 March 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

it's hard for people not to adopt a "somebody thinks they're better than me!" attitude in the face of people like yourself who clearly do think you're better than yr unwashed neighbors to the south, dude! in re: your repeated refs to my adopted home, I've just come back to where my family left in the early 1900s (same state, in fact) - everybody went to California when it was the land of opportunity, and everybody who wanted more opportunity (to, like, buy a house you might bequeath to somebody at some point) got the fuck out when the water starting circling around the drain in the this-is-the-legacy-of-prop-13 nineties IMO

seriously i if you don't like "somebody thinks they're better than me" reactions & their results on electoral outcomes, you need to fucking look within, because you flex this bullshit constantly on these threads. as if "fundamentalist xity" were an indwelling condition or something. religious behavior doesn't exist outside of class analysis either: your own religious positions are as defined by your class & station as anybody else's. fundamentalism takes hold in a place as a result of other factors, which I've already ID'd. the solution you seek begins with people not dismissing whole regions & groups of people on bullshit grounds, but unfortunately for the solution, many many Dem types including yourself are so enamored of the rush they get from being dismissive & disrespectful toward the south that there won't be any solution soon.

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

(okay the democrats need to change in other ways, different subject...)

pretty rich coming from a compromise-lovin dude like yourself who would be content with a center-right one-party system if it meant stuff "got done"

51ocki (k3vin k.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

You forgot to talk about "the attitude of your adopted region". lol

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 28 March 2010 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

pretty rich coming from a compromise-lovin dude like yourself who would be content with a center-right one-party system if it meant stuff "got done"

yeah this bullshit doesn't even warrant a response

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

yeah this bullshit doesn't even warrant a response

neither does mindless dismissal of "the south" but we love you!

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

I don't look at the south any differently than I look at, idk, bakersfield.

I do think that religious behavior exists outside of class analysis; it certainly can in california, where the people I know who became super religious were all middle class and comfortable. maybe it's different in the south - I'm willing to admit that I don't know.

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

I've got friends and relatives who moved to the South and were shocked and really saddened at the open casual racism, like the type of thing where someone rants or makes jokes about black people assuming that as fellow white people obviously they share the same assumptions and find the same things funny. Somehow it sounded different and less harmful than the really hateful evil shit that I've heard from way too many white suburban Detroiters.

My relatives in Georgia were also amazed at the amount of effort still put into to discussion of and focus on the Civil War, and I wonder if this is where the "intrinsic to the region" conservatism comes from - the South seceeded, got beat, and was reabsorbed by the evil Northern based Federal Government telling them how to live their lives.

I've lived in a lot of rural, rustic, live-and-let-live kind of libertarian places where gun laws and rules telling you what to do with your land are the worst thing ever, but none of these places was ever defeated in armed conflict by the Feds and forced to follow along; this has to have a big impact on a region, right?

joygoat, Sunday, 28 March 2010 18:48 (fifteen years ago)

iatee said this, but john i don't see how your constant classification of iatee as "getting a rush" by demeaning the south is any different of a bastardization than you're railing against

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 18:53 (fifteen years ago)

I've lived in a lot of rural, rustic, live-and-let-live kind of libertarian places where gun laws and rules telling you what to do with your land are the worst thing ever, but none of these places was ever defeated in armed conflict by the Feds and forced to follow along; this has to have a big impact on a region, right?

― joygoat, Sunday, March 28, 2010 6:48 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark

otm cf faulkner

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 28 March 2010 18:57 (fifteen years ago)

its a deep seated mistrust bred over generations

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 28 March 2010 18:57 (fifteen years ago)

but imo thats where the modern form got its start

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 28 March 2010 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

maybe things would've gone better today if someone had posted

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1-phGU1qas

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

regarding that crazy GOP poll: sometimes i think that polls like that should be cast more in terms of rhetoric (ie, the rhetoric that people are willing to use) than actual beliefs.

i dont want to say that some respondents are being ironic, since they really do hate and mistrust Obama, but "ironic" is the closest word i can find.

maybe i'm giving them too much credit, but this interplay between belief and rhetoric strikes me as more complicated than a poll can show.

ryan, Sunday, 28 March 2010 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

a lot of those lol usa polls (or lol wherever) make me wonder about the motivations of the pollsters more than anything.

caek, Sunday, 28 March 2010 19:00 (fifteen years ago)

well to be fair, that one poll pretty much tells what it tells

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

xp to ryan; I think I know what you mean -- where "Obama is the antichrist," is hyperbolic, or expressing an affect or sentiment without stating a literal fact. This happens a lot, especially in Evangelical communities where so much communication is affective/emotional/feeling, and not supposed to be the conveyance of literal truths (which is why arguments over 'theories' are so difficult to parse).

Mordy, Sunday, 28 March 2010 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.lib.umich.edu/william-faulkner/majornovels/absalom51.jpg

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 19:11 (fifteen years ago)

anyway let's forget The Southern Thing and talk about old people.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3184/3018506736_e528b07ba3_o.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3206/3013067128_3014f9bc7a_o.jpg

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

Mordy that's it precisely.

ryan, Sunday, 28 March 2010 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

I agree w/ the sentiment - but also think whether these people 100% actually believe obama wasn't born in america or only 70% believe it is sorta splitting hairs.

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

itd be like taking a poll of democrats circa 2006 and asking them if they thought bush had a sub-80 iq or something--i bet youd get similar numbers

max, Sunday, 28 March 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

I hate people from the South because they're all sweaty. This is intrinsic to it being hot.

kenan, Sunday, 28 March 2010 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

What's the historical or geographical reason for the vertical line in that Kerry map?

Gravel Puzzleworth, Sunday, 28 March 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

One big mistake that Democrats/Republicans make with the South is presuming that each state is the same/hopeless. It's hard to imagine a Democrat winning in Alabama, but thinking that Florida is hopeless is defeatism. It's a swing state.

Likewise, people seem to think that Texas is "deep red" but it's not even a top 10 state as far as conservatism goes. The school board thing and GWB are annoying, but it's really a 55-45 kind of state.

I think this leads to a lot of laziness on the part of national Democratic leadership and liberals in general. I vividly remember in the last election when all of a sudden Cornyn had really shitty poll numbers, but the DNC hadn't really bothered getting a good candidate and there wasn't enough time for him to raise money anyway.

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 28 March 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

I wanna know what the youth of Maine had against John Kerry.

crazy ass between (askance johnson), Sunday, 28 March 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

i don't think any dem leadership thinks that florida is hopeless -- and texas is not seen as hopeless but more of... a faint hope, or a luxury. obama was able to divert more money there than kerry or gore bcuz he was much safer in actual swing states

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

texas is a 55-45 state due to its enormous hispanic population. that factor makes it a state that could swing one day, but the white people numbers aren't so great.

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

ie our political strategy for texas

1. mexicans take over texas

iatee, Sunday, 28 March 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)

well they did have it first tbf

51ocki (k3vin k.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

our day will come

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 28 March 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

i'm not defeatist, matt. i think florida tilts GOP heavily, but i'll still campaign for obama in '12 and won't give up hope. but you gots to be realistic.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

besides, just keeping places like florida and texas in play helps obama.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

xxposts Took 'em 175 years, but they're getting it back!

kenan, Sunday, 28 March 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

we'll be looking for every vote against the pawlenty juggernaut.

THAT MAN IS A COMPELLING SPEAKER.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

you hopeful dudes do realize that Bush got 40 to 44 percent of the hispanic vote in '04 right? I mean it's v. typical of the Democratic party to assume that it "gets" the Latino vote but historically I don't actually think the numbers support that contention. dumb immigration stuff is costing the Republicans the hispanic vote but some of them know what's up & can be effective in playing up the social-conservative angle.

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

("them" = Republican candidates like the Bushes)

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)

that's sort of right, j0hn. but here's another instance where the GOP is splitting at the seams. i'll bet you can't get the GOP nomination in '12 without appeasing the anti-immigration base, but a candidate like that will, in the general election, have already totally alienated hispanic voters.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

hopefully we get more super-nutso Buchanan speeches outta the whole deal, or even a Buchanan candidacy

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 28 March 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)

honestly i want the crazies cleared from the field, paving the way for one special candidate to get the GOP nomination.

http://www.freakingnews.com/pictures/46500/Sarah-Palin-Pitbull-With-Lipstick--46860.jpg

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 21:05 (fifteen years ago)

i'm up for a palin/buchanan GOP ticket, tho. prefer a palin/michele bachmann ticket, tbh.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 28 March 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

ISTR that Palin's first interest in politics was sparked as a Buchanan for President supporter.

suzy, Sunday, 28 March 2010 21:15 (fifteen years ago)

really? I thought it had something to do with Todd's hot Republican dick.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 28 March 2010 21:22 (fifteen years ago)

No, I'm on the right track but she was already mayor when he ran for Prez:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/08/mccain-camp-den.html

suzy, Sunday, 28 March 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

itd be like taking a poll of democrats circa 2006 and asking them if they thought bush had a sub-80 iq or something--i bet youd get similar numbers

otm

i'm highly suspicious of that poll.. the one taken recently of republicans in which majorities say obama wasn't born here, is the antichrist, whatever thing. that poll was "inspired by" this writer's book, wingnuts which he is trying to sell obvs so is happy to promote it, and it tells a story that gets attention so bloggers/lefty tv people are happy to talk about it. you can design a poll to get headline-generating responses for a reason other than wanting useful/fair information about what people really think. i'm not saying a lot of registered republicans aren't far right and have some wacky ideas, but there is a factor here in which.. if you polled registered dems in 2004 asking if bush was some horrible thing, you might get a majority of replies saying "yes," because.. duh, they don't like him.

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Sunday, 28 March 2010 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/28/opinion/28rich.html

Frank Rich bit that I kinda agree with, that all the brouhaha is over changing demographics, and people freaked out that folks that they might not be immediately able to identify with will be in charge.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Sunday, 28 March 2010 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

I'd put Dubya at around 120 IQ. Palin? Maybe 110. These people are not nearly as stupid as some think, but not exactly the brightest of lights, either.

Aimless, Monday, 29 March 2010 04:08 (fifteen years ago)

I think W. dropped about 15 IQ points from 2000-2008.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 29 March 2010 04:14 (fifteen years ago)

Do you really think that? It makes him smarter than 91% of the population, and her smarter than 75% of the population. People over-estimate the frequency of extreme values for normally-distributed characteristics, it seems to me.

xpost

Dan I., Monday, 29 March 2010 04:17 (fifteen years ago)

It makes... her smarter than 75% of the population.

Yeah, but even though my estimate of 110 would place her about in the 75th percentile, the difference between her and someone in the 50th percentile would still be fairly small in real terms. She's a long, long way from the tail.

Aimless, Monday, 29 March 2010 04:22 (fifteen years ago)

Wow, looks like you may be right about W! His dad scored a 91...

But we do know that the young Bush registered a score of 1206 on the SAT, the most widely used test of college aptitude. (The more cerebral Al Gore obtained 1355.)
...
It's tempting to employ Al Gore's IQ:SAT ratio of 134:1355 as a formula for estimating Bush's probable intelligence quotient — an exercise in fuzzy statistics that predicts a score of 119. If the number sounds familiar, it's precisely the IQ score attributed to Kennedy, whom Princeton political scientist Fred Greenstein, in "The Presidential Difference," commended as "a quick study, whose wit was an indication of a subtle mind.

http://www1.csbsju.edu/uspp/Election/bush011401.htm

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 29 March 2010 04:28 (fifteen years ago)

a study in contrasts:

http://i.imgur.com/P7uNU.jpg

note that gop.com currently redirects to gop.com/firepelosi

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Monday, 29 March 2010 04:30 (fifteen years ago)

Hidden message: GOP wants to go Olde School

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1130/1415837446_674650d2b4.jpg

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 29 March 2010 04:34 (fifteen years ago)

a study in contrasts:

http://i.imgur.com/P7uNU.jpg

note that gop.com currently redirects to gop.com/firepelosi

― requiem for crunk (kingfish), Monday, March 29, 2010 12:30 AM (14 minutes ago)

wowww

51ocki (k3vin k.), Monday, 29 March 2010 04:49 (fifteen years ago)

love that frank rich article that was posted upthread:

If Obama’s first legislative priority had been immigration or financial reform or climate change, we would have seen the same trajectory. The conjunction of a black president and a female speaker of the House — topped off by a wise Latina on the Supreme Court and a powerful gay Congressional committee chairman — would sow fears of disenfranchisement among a dwindling and threatened minority in the country no matter what policies were in play. It’s not happenstance that Frank, Lewis and Cleaver — none of them major Democratic players in the health care push — received a major share of last weekend’s abuse. When you hear demonstrators chant the slogan “Take our country back!,” these are the people they want to take the country back from.

otm

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 04:57 (fifteen years ago)

TWEET BOMB

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Monday, 29 March 2010 05:01 (fifteen years ago)

I can't take anyone seriously that says "Wise Latina". It's like something from a Simpsons joke about TV producers thinking up new shows.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 29 March 2010 05:02 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, that was a dumb phrase. but i heart frank rich.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 05:03 (fifteen years ago)

well he's obv mocking it -- that's a booming paragraph tho

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Monday, 29 March 2010 05:04 (fifteen years ago)

you all do remember that that was the phrase tossed around back during her nom? they took it from an old quote of hers and tried to mock it?

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Monday, 29 March 2010 05:05 (fifteen years ago)

oh yeah! i actually did forget that.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 05:08 (fifteen years ago)

Does Rich think the tea partiers want to take the country back from non-Anglos, but are happy to leave it in the hands of white Harvard grads like himself?

I think ultimately the GOP's plutocrat base has as much to fear from the tea partiers as the Dems do, but I guess they've determined that really this is still not much to fear, since the national-level politicians who the tea partiers presently support offer no threat to the plutocracy. Is this why the GOP plutocrat base hates Huckabee so much?

lube and (Euler), Monday, 29 March 2010 05:30 (fifteen years ago)

tea-party/GOP-related: FBI raids militia; seven arrested (so far).

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 05:34 (fifteen years ago)

happy to leave it in the hands of white Harvard grads like himself?

How 'bout Yale grads? They were quite happy with those. Again, it all depends on the selling, and i think the plutocrats are more concerned with the 1st-order similarities than anything deeper.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Monday, 29 March 2010 05:36 (fifteen years ago)

about that militia raid link: oh great, Washtenaw County is in the news again.

15 years ago, one of the Michigan connections to the Oklahoma City bombing was a militia dude, a janitor in my freshman-year dorm in Ann Arbor. Ann Arbor is, of course, located in Washtenaw County.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Monday, 29 March 2010 05:40 (fifteen years ago)

well, yeah! re. Bush. So far the GOP has been able to sell their plutocrats to (latent) tea partiers as "one of them", as you say. But if the tea party flames burn enough, and we get a real populist movement in the USA, this game is up. My remark earlier was that the GOP must think the threat of this is pretty low (I'd say they're right).

lube and (Euler), Monday, 29 March 2010 05:48 (fifteen years ago)

Something VERY interesting, almost a throw-away, in The Bridge addresses the genesis of the tea party and certain other memes. I hadn't realized something fairly specific had come up as an elision quite when it did. I'll quote:

"All they ever hear at election time is 'Negro, Negro, Negro!'" Johnson said in 1964, at a fund-raising dinner in New Orleans. He predicted that the passage of the Civil Rights Act would cost the national Democratic Party the South for at least a generation, but explicit racist demagoguery was replaced by appeals that were more cleverly coded. George Wallace dropped slogans like "Segregation today, segregation forever" and called on his followers to awaken to the threat of a 'liberal-Socialistic-Communist design to destroy local government in America.'"

suzy, Monday, 29 March 2010 08:44 (fifteen years ago)

Can anyone exlain the pre-existing conditions thing? To an outsider that seems like the people who would need it most (ummm.... people with illnesses) were previously unable to get coverage? So like if you were born with a genetic condition then the countries medical companies would just tell you to fuck off and suffer? If this is in anyway what it actually meant, why the fuck weren't you guys rioting?

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 29 March 2010 11:31 (fifteen years ago)

insurance companies could refuse to insure you if you had a pre-existing condition in the same way that a bookie wouldn't take a bet on a match that had already finished, is my understanding.

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 11:51 (fifteen years ago)

So it just means if you were gonna die, they'd tell you to fuck off? Doesn't every human who wasn't Muhammed have a pre-existing condition then?

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 29 March 2010 11:54 (fifteen years ago)

aging naturally is not a pre-existing condition, although i can see why someone of your tender years may well look at it that way

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 11:55 (fifteen years ago)

It happens mostly when people switch jobs and insurers/plans. My neighbours had a daughter born with very little of her renal system - she needed to be replumbed and would go on to need a transplant, but was insured through her parents' policy. When her father, an accountant, switched jobs, the new insurer would take him, his other two children and wife, but not this girl. The girl is a lawyer now.

Of course it's massively unfair! What really sucks is recission: say you've paid a lifetime worth of insurance premiums and your provider bounces your cancer treatment because you had a basal cell carcinoma (not really cancer, despite an -oma) removed 10 years ago, arguing that's a pre-existing condition. I could probably win that argument, but a person not versed much in medical stuff would be bamboozled and afraid of authority. People who spend $10k a year on their family's healthcare are the victims of this all the time, which adds up. If that happened to me, I would probably add up all of my premium costs over time w/compound interest and bill them for that amount via an attorney. FUCKERS.

suzy, Monday, 29 March 2010 12:22 (fifteen years ago)

I think along with the batshit craziness of this, its also the TEN THOUSAND A YEAR ONLY ON POSSIBLY MIGHT NEEDING TO GO THE DOCTOR? Are these figures not insanely wtf?

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 29 March 2010 13:50 (fifteen years ago)

They are - plus they are often more costly than the mortgages of many of the same people.

suzy, Monday, 29 March 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)

if i ever had an urge to ever live in america, this shit has certainly killed that want dead in the ground.

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 29 March 2010 13:54 (fifteen years ago)

but we are awesome!?!

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:00 (fifteen years ago)

And it's kinda cool that we have a proud history of invading sovereign nations and replacing their heads of state.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:05 (fifteen years ago)

then those nations become awesome, too.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)

on the other hand, we have great weather

max, Monday, 29 March 2010 14:08 (fifteen years ago)

and a wonderful popular music industry.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:09 (fifteen years ago)

hard to tell who's serious and who's joking here tbh

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:09 (fifteen years ago)

I AM SERIOUS

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:10 (fifteen years ago)

dear god he's serious

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:10 (fifteen years ago)

If redistributing wealth to the health care and military-industrial complexes is wrong, then I don't want to be right.

lube and (Euler), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:13 (fifteen years ago)

If being on the right is wrong, then I'm already confused tbh

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)

America's secret weapon, Waffle House, means we will always rule

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:23 (fifteen years ago)

Nice work, agent Twink Will Ferrell. Such quick thinking means they'll not suspect the real secret weapon.

suzy, Monday, 29 March 2010 14:25 (fifteen years ago)

american exceptionalism in a nutshell:

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/O/5/kerry_wafflehouse.jpg

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:25 (fifteen years ago)

other countries call them parliaments tbh

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:26 (fifteen years ago)

dammit xpost defeat to john kerry that stings

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:26 (fifteen years ago)

oh shit mods plz google proof "w4ff13 h0us3," the europeans must never learn of our achilles heel magic feather type deal

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:26 (fifteen years ago)

the achilles heel magic feather deal, now available at your local waffle house

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:27 (fifteen years ago)

the fact that America is awesome despite all the shit that's wrong with it is a testament to how awesome the awesome stuff is

iatee, Monday, 29 March 2010 14:28 (fifteen years ago)

for example, w@ff13 h0us3

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:29 (fifteen years ago)

even our flaws are awesome. we rock.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:29 (fifteen years ago)

more awesome things we produced: miley cirus; the pet rock; roller-disco.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:30 (fifteen years ago)

Mad Men rocks. Even the token britisher in it joined the yanks at the end of Season Three.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:30 (fifteen years ago)

Chia Pet superior to pet rock IMO

suzy, Monday, 29 March 2010 14:31 (fifteen years ago)

is chia pet a european creation?

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:31 (fifteen years ago)

"Chia Pets are figurines by the San Francisco, California-based company Joseph Enterprises Inc."

we are still awesome imo.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:32 (fifteen years ago)

they stole it from the mayans

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:33 (fifteen years ago)

USA! USA!

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:33 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.classroomhelp.com/lessons/Presidents/presimages/Regan.jpg

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:34 (fifteen years ago)

wow, he cuts a dashing figure.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:35 (fifteen years ago)

he should be on the $50.00 bill

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:35 (fifteen years ago)

he should be on every bill

iatee, Monday, 29 March 2010 14:35 (fifteen years ago)

people are forgetting that america used to be great, right up until health care reform destroyed it.

aarrissi-a-roni, Monday, 29 March 2010 14:36 (fifteen years ago)

America was way cool. Everybody loved America. It walked on the water and swam on the land...

Ned Raggett, Monday, 29 March 2010 14:39 (fifteen years ago)

until you communists destroyed it.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)

http://cache2.asset-cache.net/xc/50588057.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=E41C9FE5C4AA0A140FF88D406DE732617DC830BA91C4B00E7A2549ECBB9C90F3B01E70F2B3269972

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)

O beautiful for heroes proved
In liberating strife.
Who more than self their country loved.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_qaR83Z5EiIQ/SzBFxaxH3ZI/AAAAAAAABrQ/Xu2-MhaWGv0/s640/Palin-Reagan+7.png

lube and (Euler), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:42 (fifteen years ago)

in b4 ws

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:42 (fifteen years ago)

now I know how easy it is to be Mark Levin and K-Lo.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:44 (fifteen years ago)

lol @ "Regan.jpg"

goole, Monday, 29 March 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)

Intellectual property is the only real American export post-20th century that people all around the world love.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 29 March 2010 14:48 (fifteen years ago)

that reagan/palin picture shows off the rugged, frontiersman-like figures that make this country gr8.

we need leaders that will jump into the water to beat the shark off the victim, not leaders who will carefully analyze the shark attack; consider the implications of a response; and wryly narrate the attack.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:49 (fifteen years ago)

shark = inflation, right?

iatee, Monday, 29 March 2010 14:49 (fifteen years ago)

actually, shark = "the evildoers" (it's a riff off a peggy noonan post-9/11 article)

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:50 (fifteen years ago)

peggy noonan: men are back.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:51 (fifteen years ago)

in some ways, this article explains the conservative movement of the past decade.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:52 (fifteen years ago)

Noonan would have beaten Reagan's shark anyday.

lube and (Euler), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:52 (fifteen years ago)

Its true there's nothing more rugged and American than being elected to the board of the Screen Actors Guild.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/Ronald_Reagan_and_General_Electric_Theater_1954-62.jpg/220px-Ronald_Reagan_and_General_Electric_Theater_1954-62.jpg

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 29 March 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)

Peggy Noonan is second only to K-Lo in her craving for a dicking.

Let me tell you when I first realized what I'm saying. On Friday, Sept. 14, I went with friends down to the staging area on the West Side Highway where all the trucks filled with guys coming off a 12-hour shift at ground zero would pass by. They were tough, rough men, the grunts of the city--construction workers and electrical workers and cops and emergency medical worker and firemen.
I joined a group that was just standing there as the truck convoys went by. And all we did was cheer. We all wanted to do some kind of volunteer work but there was nothing left to do, so we stood and cheered those who were doing. The trucks would go by and we'd cheer and wave and shout "God bless you!" and "We love you!" We waved flags and signs, clapped and threw kisses, and we meant it: We loved these men. And as the workers would go by--they would wave to us from their trucks and buses, and smile and nod--I realized that a lot of them were men who hadn't been applauded since the day they danced to their song with their bride at the wedding.

And suddenly I looked around me at all of us who were cheering. And saw who we were. Investment bankers! Orthodontists! Magazine editors! In my group, a lawyer, a columnist and a writer. We had been the kings and queens of the city, respected professional in a city that respects its professional class. And this night we were nobody. We were so useless, all we could do was applaud the somebodies, the workers who, unlike us, had not been applauded much in their lives.

And now they were saving our city.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)

Noonan would have beaten Reagan's shark anyday.

ha!

the "shark-story" from the article:

Here's what I'm trying to say: Once about 10 years ago there was a story--you might have read it in your local tabloid, or a supermarket tabloid like the National Enquirer--about an American man and woman who were on their honeymoon in Australia or New Zealand. They were swimming in the ocean, the water chest-high. From nowhere came a shark. The shark went straight for the woman, opened its jaws. Do you know what the man did? He punched the shark in the head. He punched it and punched it again. He did not do brilliant commentary on the shark, he did not share his sensitive feelings about the shark, he did not make wry observations about the shark, he punched the shark in the head. So the shark let go of his wife and went straight for him. And it killed him. The wife survived to tell the story of what her husband had done. He had tried to deck the shark. I told my friends: That's what a wonderful man is, a man who will try to deck the shark.

I don't know what the guy did for a living, but he had a very old-fashioned sense of what it is to be a man, and I think that sense is coming back into style because of who saved us on Sept. 11, and that is very good for our country.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:54 (fifteen years ago)

ya but that dude died

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:55 (fifteen years ago)

yea, but A MAN WILL TRY TO DECK THE SHARK

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:55 (fifteen years ago)

With 40 years of professional TV, film, and voice acting behind him, no wonder Ronald Reagan is the greatest American president!

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/b2/Reagan-LPcover.jpg/220px-Reagan-LPcover.jpg

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 29 March 2010 14:56 (fifteen years ago)

the reason that there aren't any men like that around anymore is because sharks ate the all imo

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 14:56 (fifteen years ago)

YOU ALL ARE MISSING THE POINT OF THE STORY

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 14:58 (fifteen years ago)

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_yEo2CYoHMmA/R5lyaL0-FBI/AAAAAAAAA4k/OItkV86BQlk/s400/Reagan-Romney.jpg

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:00 (fifteen years ago)

what is obama gonna do when the sharks invade? that's what i wanna know.

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:00 (fifteen years ago)

bow, iirc

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)

http://static.blip.tv/Thepoorbastard-ThisIsMittRomney101.jpg

ENOUGH SAID

lube and (Euler), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

obama will do brilliant commentary on the shark, share his sensitive feelings about the shark, and make wry observations about the shark

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

the person making wry observations about the guy who hit the shark is the real hero obv

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:03 (fifteen years ago)

ok i've always been a big fan of obama but the impending shark menace really has me wondering about his substance. you've given me a lot to ponder, citizens of the waffle house.

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:03 (fifteen years ago)

maybe obama is the shark?

iatee, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)

No, the walrus was Paul.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)

has shark punching jumped the shark?

passing through the whirlyturn (onimo), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)

Direct punch to shark snout knocks the fuckers unconscious. You guys are forgetting something else:

http://lavagal.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/25obama0600.jpg

suzy, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)

maybe obama is the shark?

i believe you've nailed it

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)

barracuda obama

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:06 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.mockpaperscissors.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/k-lo-at-home-292x300.jpg

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:07 (fifteen years ago)

Just posting something random so when I re-click I will NEVER HAVE TO SEE THAT AGAIN.

suzy, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:09 (fifteen years ago)

The corn is as high as a K-Lo's eye.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:10 (fifteen years ago)

manliness wins wars

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 15:10 (fifteen years ago)

gross that elephant's neck is shaped like a face

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:10 (fifteen years ago)

THE HUTAREE RANK SYSTEM

RANKS:

RADOK [RD]

BORAMANDER [BM]

ZULIF [ZL]

ARKON [AK]

GOLD RIFLEMAN [GR]

SILVER RIFLEMAN [SR]

BRONZE RIFLEMAN [BR]

LUKORE [LK]

MASTER GUNNER [MG]

SENIOR GUNNER [SG]

GUNNER [GN]

PARABLES OF THE SOLDIER Ranking officers and commanders; serve your men for you lead them; humble before your team. Cause you may be a leader of flesh but in heaven leaders are of spirit.

LOW RANKING SOLDIERS AND GRUNTS Respect the officer above you and obey your commander with dignity. Each man holds his place in flesh and spirit, heaven and earth.

YOUR PLACE A servant is not above his master and a master not above his lord. All masters have had a master before an apprentice.

Back

goole, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:16 (fifteen years ago)

haaaa

http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2214

goole, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:17 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.h utaree.com/ forum/

Evil Jew Forum
Talk about being an evil Jew and how we are taking over the world in our own private forum where no one else can see. Shalomi or something.

o_O

passing through the whirlyturn (onimo), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:21 (fifteen years ago)

wait waht?

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 15:24 (fifteen years ago)

no way in hell am i digging around on that site at work (ps i tried a second ago and it was down anyway)

goole, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

i'm not sposed to talk about how i'm an evil jew tbh

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

It's breaking news that this Hutaree christianist militia was plotting to kill cops, and it's not just in MI, it's in OH and IN too.

suzy, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)

(how do you find a google-cached version of a link on a given page? i wanna continue reading that amazing conversation w/o actually going to the site)

goole, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

You really don't want to read the next page at work. Really :(

passing through the whirlyturn (onimo), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

i'm not sposed to talk about how i'm an evil jew tbh

― Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 16:27 (7 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

you do this like 10 times a day on the premiership thread iirc?

he might have even have gone in. (a hoy hoy), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

mods had promised this long time since that that thread would soon belong to a private and de-indexed separate board tbh.

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

boy you were right about that onimo

goole, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

haha, i ignored that warning too, really regretting it.

joe, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)

Chairman, with this nonsense, you are really spoiling us:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/29/voyeur-west-hollywood-mic_n_516903.html

suzy, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

I should have explicitly said why, shouldn't I? Anyone else curious enough to load up a pile of stretched arse goatse old man porn or whatever the fuck I clicked away from in that awful split second, go right ahead.

passing through the whirlyturn (onimo), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

i was hoping for more jesus-rpg black helicopter chat, i was just kind of disappointed at the inevitable ANON WILL DESTROY U posts tbh

goole, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

nah, that'll wait til i get home, thanks

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.hutaree.com/ezra files.htm

some terrific jokes here

max, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

The beast's number (humor)

670 - Approximate number of the Beast
DCLXVI - Roman numeral of the Beast
666.0000000 - Number of the High Precision Beast
665.9999954 - Number of the Pentium Beast
0.666 - Number of the Millibeast
/666 - Beast Common Denominator
666 x sq. rt (-1) - Imaginary number of the Beast
1010011010 - Binary of the Beast
1-666 - Area code of the Beast
00666 - Zip code of the Beast
1-900-666-0666 - Live Beasts! Call Now! Only $6.66/minute. (Must be over 18)
$665.95 - Retail price of the Beast
$710.36 - Price of the Beast plus 6.66% state sales tax
$769.95 - Price of the Beast with all accessories and replacement soul
$606.66 - Price of the Beast at Wal-Mart
$566.66 - Price of the Beast at Costco
Phillips 666 - Gasoline of the Beast
Route 666 - Way of the Beast
666 F - Oven temperature for roast Beast
666k - Retirement plan of the Beast
666 mg - Recommended Daily Allowance of Beast
6.66 % - 5 year CD interest rate at First Beast of Hell National Bank ($666 minimum deposit)
6-6-6.xls - Spreadsheet of the Beast
Word 6.66 - Word Processor of the Beast
666i - BMW of the Beast
DSM-666 (revised) - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the Beast
668 - Next-door neighbor of the Beast

max, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

poll

Mr. Que, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

rda of the beast ftw

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

Once on the ground, FEC filings suggest, Steele travels in style. A February RNC trip to California, for example, included a $9,099 stop at the Beverly Hills Hotel, $6,596 dropped at the nearby Four Seasons, and $1,620.71 spent [update: the amount is actually $1,946.25] at Voyeur West Hollywood, a bondage-themed nightclub featuring topless women dancers imitating lesbian sex.

Damn, he should just quit the RNC and become a rap star.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

Love how the Roman numerals are in perfect descending order.

DCLXVI (suzy), Monday, 29 March 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

DSM of the beast!

kate78, Monday, 29 March 2010 15:58 (fifteen years ago)

C'mon, I've been making the "668, neighbor of the beast" joke for years now! But those jokes are behind the times, some smart dudes more accurately figured at 616.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 29 March 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

oh my. apologies if this has been posted before.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

616? That's Michigan! Makes sense.

kate78, Monday, 29 March 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

That's what I always say! More accurately, it's Grand Rapids. Double win!

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 29 March 2010 16:12 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/assets_c/2010/03/cspanwashjournalguy-cropped-proto-custom_2.jpg

51ocki (k3vin k.), Monday, 29 March 2010 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

and wtf at the c-span host "understanding (the caller's) frustration"? i mean, there's a legitimate gripe if a concerted effort is being made to jam the GOP lines with democratic-leaning callers, but this caller's gripe is nothing of the sort -- it's just thinly-veiled racism.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

the enthusiasm gap. democrats should have stars fan out across the country to host parties for those who vote democrat in the midterm elections. one way to drum up "enthusiasm" among typically apathetic democratic voting blocks in midterm elections.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

are we healthy yet?

ksh, Monday, 29 March 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

In terms of psychosis we're less healthy than ever.

Mordy, Monday, 29 March 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

great to hear

ksh, Monday, 29 March 2010 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZGVmYzkyNmQ5MTNlN2EwMTE5Yzg2MjZhZmNiNGU4ZGE=

sister kathryn, finally...

On Pope Benedict XVI: He may have been a participant in the cultural problems in the Church, but he has also been a most prominent and effective leader in the solution (John Allen made this point well in the New York Times this weekend). There are decades’ worth of stories that can and will be drudged up, and they should be. (George Weigel, biographer of John Paul II, actually gave thanks for the work the Boston Globe did back in the Nineties.) But the easiest takeaway -- that the source of the problem, these crimes and cover-ups, is some perversion at the heart of the Catholic Church -- may just be a sloppy, ignorant conclusion. The real source of the problem is Catholics not being Catholic. It’s Catholics not imposing their beliefs on themselves and not applying fraternal correction where it is needed most. If you’re a Catholic and you’ve been listening to him, Benedict, in just about his every remark and release, has talked to you about what being Catholic means. And being Catholic is challenging to those on the political Right and the political Left, to every man and woman, including priests and prefects. As it should be.

because it's just to damn hard to live up to the discipline of non-child-raping? is that really the argument you have put forward in public.

goole, Monday, 29 March 2010 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

In terms of psychosis we're less healthy than ever.

I'm somewhere between fearful and convinced that at least a few people are soon to be unhealthy in a gun-wounded kind of way. :(

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 17:01 (fifteen years ago)

More accurately, it's Grand Rapids. Double win!

It is such a weird place.

ô_o (Nicole), Monday, 29 March 2010 17:10 (fifteen years ago)

via yglesias, this is fascinating

http://crookedtimber.org/2010/03/29/partisanbipartisan/

goole, Monday, 29 March 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

lol. just spotted that and was coming here to post it.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 17:15 (fifteen years ago)

anybody know anything about Kendrick Meek? as a kid, I was conscripted to gather signatures to waive the filing fee for a third-party congressional candidate, and it's a whole lot of work - you're lucky to get ten signatures a day, so even if this was a super-coordinated effort, it's worthy of note.

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 29 March 2010 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

His mom is legendary in South Florida politics.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 March 2010 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

glenn greenwald spends pretty much a whole chapter on his book about those peggy nonnan/k-lo columns

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Monday, 29 March 2010 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

ok so the lib blogs are all laffing about the RNC expense at some strip club in west hollywood that featured "simulated lesbianism" or some shit. "must be reviewing their dadt stance lololol" yeah ok we get it

marc ambinder lays it all out in intra-party terms; apparently tucker carlson is trying to make a name as the anti-steele operator in the party:

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/03/michael-steeles-enemies-within/38161/

and i got thinking about the elections this year -- dems of course have monstrous headwinds, and americans respect/approve of exactly NO politicians at the moment. but can a GOP this fractious, this badly led, this disorganized, this incoherent, and this BROKE possibly win? maybe ONLY in a climate like an off-year in a recession could they win, and that's where we are...

but this sentence caught my eye:

But the sad truth for the RNC chairman is that he escapes censure because his party isn't organized enough to censure him, because Steele wields too little power to be considered a threat, and because the locus of Republican energy these days can be found in the House.

threat to whom? if the chairman is wielding "too little" power, who has the rest? so it's up to john boehner, eric cantor and paul ryan... and michelle bachmann, i guess, to win this year?

goole, Monday, 29 March 2010 18:28 (fifteen years ago)

and as always, the liberal blogs don't bring the lols like the pros:

Re: RNC in Bondage [Kathryn Jean Lopez]

Penny Nance from Concerned Women for America has a few questions:

Did they really agree to reimburse nearly $2,000 for a bondage-themed night club? We have several questions for the RNC: Why would a staffer believe that this is acceptable, and has this kind of thing been approved in the past?

Please explain to women if and why you think it is appropriate to attach your organizations to pornographic enterprises? Did you really swill drinks, ogle young girls and plan party business at this kind of establishment?

03/29 02:20 PMShare

goole, Monday, 29 March 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

If those priests are found guilty then it would have been less harmful to let your children hang out with Michael Jackson. He was never found guilty.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 29 March 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)

i don't understand that sentence

goole, Monday, 29 March 2010 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

the locus of Republican energy is found on fox news

iatee, Monday, 29 March 2010 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

i don't understand that sentence

Since everyone knows they did and it's all over the news, it's an objective fact and as such doesn't carry much weight for Concerned Women for America. They need a confirmation from a first-hand rightwing source.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 29 March 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

xp cf. David Frum

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

what? adam that post of k-lo's from CWA doesn't have anything to do with the priest child rape scandal

goole, Monday, 29 March 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah i wasn't responding to that obv!

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 29 March 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

back to the "who are these people" question, i don't think we should leave out the important "drunk old men in SUVs" demographic:

http://www.tennessean.com/article/20100327/NEWS03/3270355/Victim+of+road+rage+sparked+by+Obama+sticker+pleads+for+civility

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Monday, 29 March 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

It's like meme overload right now. Funny reading about these fundamentalist Christian terrorists:
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/03/feds_release_details_in_hutaree_arrests.php

Will they get tortured? Detainment without trial? Or is that only for non-Christian terrorists?

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 29 March 2010 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

xpost:

or the "well-dressed upper-middle-class white women making throat-slashing gestures" contingent:

http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2010/mar/29/obama-sticker-removed-after-ugly-incident/

oh it's good to be back in tennessee.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Monday, 29 March 2010 18:41 (fifteen years ago)

dude has been arrested for Cantor death threat btw

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 29 March 2010 18:44 (fifteen years ago)

The Michigan militia Hutaree, whose members have been charged for an alleged plot to attack police, burns a U.N. flag in a video posted on the group's YouTube page.

The clip dated June 30, 2009, and described as "UN in America," shows flames engulfing a U.N. flag in slow motion, over the sound of "First and Last and Always," by the 80s goth-rock band Sisters of Mercy.

Hutaree members wielding assault rifles then hoist the group's own flag, emblazoned with a dagger and two pillars forming an "H," a pair of red spears, and "CCR," the acronym for Colonial Christian Republic.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Monday, 29 March 2010 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

The clip dated June 30, 2009, and described as "UN in America," shows flames engulfing a U.N. flag in slow motion, over the sound of "First and Last and Always," by the 80s goth-rock band Sisters of Mercy.

Hahahah okay wait a minute.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 29 March 2010 18:48 (fifteen years ago)

"CCR," the acronym for Colonial Christian Republic

born to choogle, I see

lube and (Euler), Monday, 29 March 2010 18:48 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, of all songs:

See a body and a dream of the dead days
A following lost and blind
Living far from here
Tomorrow is hard to find
And it seems like twenty five years of
Promises and give me more
Scenes of a hand-me-down in
Dresses heard before

First and last and always: Til the end of time
First and last and always: Mine

Maybe it's not so easy
Maybe it's a way to long
Say, say you'll be by me
When the evidence comes along

First and last and always: My calling, my time
First and last and always: Mine

My calling
My time

See a place and a dream of the dead days
A following lost and blind
Cross my heart with silver
Here's the key behind
Seems like twenty five years of
Ever after ever more more more
Seems I wore this face for you
Far too long before

Ned Raggett, Monday, 29 March 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

Though I suppose the 'following lost and blind' part makes sense.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 29 March 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

I wonder what they make of "This Corrosion".

ô_o (Nicole), Monday, 29 March 2010 18:51 (fifteen years ago)

Hahahah okay wait a minute.

― Ned Raggett, Monday, March 29, 2010

I was going to say! Glad to know you're not mixed up in all this unpleasantness.

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Monday, 29 March 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)

If anything "Dominion/Mother Russia" would seem more their speed. Or "Vision Thing."

Ned Raggett, Monday, 29 March 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

I've been now sauntering out and down a path sometime.
Come on, it takes me nowhere which I know
Faces everywhere pulling grins and signs and things
Telling me not there man, it's no go (Don't go there boy)

I need a reason (I can't think without one now)
Too much learning got to show
Call it treason (Maybe catch her don't know how)
Too many things too much to know

I'll bring my timing in, seagulls gather on the wind.
Lady screaming, lady leave me out
'cause sometimes people stare (Sitting down, electric chair)
And steaming crowds they gather and they shout

Don't know why this evil bothers me (Take another chance boy carry the
fight You can take him if you're fast)

So why is he trying to follow me? (Didn't I say if you're holdin' on
You'd be laughing at the last)

How many reasons do they need? (I get along fine with them friends of
mine, But you have to make a choice)

I might just believe this time (You're singing out of tune, but the beats
in time. And it's us who make the noise)

I'm talking for free. I can't stop myself, It's a new religion
I've something to see, I help myself, It's a new religion

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 March 2010 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

I believe this is the dude who's been arrested in re: Cantor's office

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gdOfwx6I3kQ

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 29 March 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

oh man he has a lot of stuff uploaded and is severely mentally ill. maybe take that video down, it feels kinda wrong to be looking at this dude having watched a few of his videos. this is a guy who needed help and didn't get it (or did and couldn't accept it) - ideas of reference, delusions of grandeur, a little clang-association stuff at some points - hard to see.

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 29 March 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

is that really the Leboon guy, or are you kidding

goole, Monday, 29 March 2010 19:35 (fifteen years ago)

That guy seems a little unbalanced, yeah, but he has a couple of pretty OTM sentences there.

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

oh, i see that it is. wow.

xp

goole, Monday, 29 March 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

kenan, the guy who seems to you "a little unbalanced" believes that he can read the minds of every creature on the planet.

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 29 March 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

I didn't see that clip.

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

Hard to hear his voice without hearing it asking," Would you fuck me? I'd fuck me."

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 19:55 (fifteen years ago)

hold on, are you telling me that kenan is identifying with someone who is "a little unbalanced"

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Monday, 29 March 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)

yes, and then he's comparing the guy to Buffalo Bill

Mr. Que, Monday, 29 March 2010 19:57 (fifteen years ago)

I'm not identifying with him, ffs.

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 19:58 (fifteen years ago)

lol J0rdan plz to post your post count & a pic of a glass house, I don't think anybody at this bar gets to flex mental health chops on his fellow barflies

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 29 March 2010 19:59 (fifteen years ago)

still kenan I think it's only fair to give you shit about otm'ing the guy who identifies himself as God

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 29 March 2010 19:59 (fifteen years ago)

correction, Himself, better safe than sorry

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 29 March 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

lol are you suggesting everyone in this thread belongs in the looney bin

Mr. Que, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

or ilx as a whole

Mr. Que, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

"You yourself have said it" -Jesus the Christ

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 29 March 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)

I said a couple sentences. Like the ones about America not being supreme anymore. Or Obama liking his $3000 suits.

Which, btw, made me think of Will Arnett on Arrested Development. "This is a $7000 suit! COME ON!"

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

i always thought that was a lame joke, for Gob.

Mr. Que, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

Good for you.

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

man, these militia people are scary lookin'

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/

Mr. Que, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

lower left is a truly outstanding mullet the likes of which you'll rarely see outside of Germany

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 29 March 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

Check out the photos of your zip code's resident sex offenders. Same kinds of photos.

http://www.familywatchdog.us/

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

guy on the bottom right is gonna be in my nightmares tonight

Mr. Que, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

xpost: wtf

Mr. Que, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

man, these militia people are scary lookin'

gotta wonder about the lone woman's relationships with the others

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 29 March 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

reminds me of:
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:5DhYXi6aY5nwZM:http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_f22CuCnXNoE/SmSDflUfIvI/AAAAAAAACs0/DhslhUaKe1w/s400/friedman%2Bcomic%2Bshop.jpg

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 29 March 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

haha ah fuck you tiny picture

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 29 March 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

Dick Tracy characters? I can only guess.

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

"Comic Shop Clerks of North America" by Drew Friedman

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 29 March 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

xpost: wtf

I didn't mean your zip code specifically. Mugshots be lookin' like mugshots, I guess.

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

i just think it's funny that you think i would be interested in looking at mug shots of convicted sex offenders vs. a bunch of Christian boobs who wanted to blow stuff up

Mr. Que, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

lone woman lynndiesque

kingkongvsgodzilla, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

I thought of it because the last time I looked through that site, I was like, "Holy shit. Yeah, I wouldn't loan any one of these dudes $5. Freakshow!"

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

carnies vs. sex offenders

Mr. Que, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)

god look what I miss when I have to do my job.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 March 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

so is anybody else excited for Levi Johnston's reality TV series?! can't wait til he's old enough to run for president

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 29 March 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

god look what I miss when I have to do my job.

Way to make me feel bad for not doing mine. :(

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

can't wait til he's old enough to run for president be my daddy.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 March 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

Apropos of nothing, I'm surprised I haven't yet seen a single "Michael Steele played bass in The Bangles" hilarious joke / photoshop / meme attempt; did I just miss it or is that too weak even for the internet?

http://musicboomerstyle.art.officelive.com/images/michaelsteele.jpg

anatol_merklich, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

If Michael Steele looked like that, the Republican Party wouldn't have silently prevented him from appearing on television anymore.

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:33 (fifteen years ago)

Apropos of nothing, I'm surprised I haven't yet seen a single "Michael Steele played bass in The Bangles" hilarious joke / photoshop / meme attempt; did I just miss it or is that too weak even for the internet?

Because I adore Michael Steele the Bangle way too much to sully her reputation on that kind of smear.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 March 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

zero takes a fall

velko, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)

I made that joke on someone's facebook status and he just deleted the whole post.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)

Norman's youtube favorites are all politics except for two clips of Eliza Dushku.

maybe otm on that too?

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 29 March 2010 20:51 (fifteen years ago)

He was going to kill Eric Cantor to impress Eliza Dushku.

ô_o (Nicole), Monday, 29 March 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)

hell i'd do that

ps feds, kidding

goole, Monday, 29 March 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)

what a loon that guy is.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 21:04 (fifteen years ago)

already have right-winger friends painting this guy as a 'typical leftist' in the US

akm, Monday, 29 March 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)

oh yeah. he's a typical leftist. we're all like that.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 21:18 (fifteen years ago)

like all typical leftists, I too can read the minds of all living things on the planet. including the minds of your right-winger friends. who are currently fantasizing about attending a lesbian-themed bondage nightclub.

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 29 March 2010 21:18 (fifteen years ago)

you know, it's funny. when i first saw that young fellow's youtube video, i thought "hey, here's a typical leftist, like so many i know. why, he reminds me a little of me when i was that age." it was an emotional moment.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 29 March 2010 21:20 (fifteen years ago)

"It puts the lotion on its skin... sorry *sniff*... I just need a moment..."

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 21:23 (fifteen years ago)

haha

I will probably never get over the fact that his name is Norman Leboon

akm, Monday, 29 March 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)

did we post the new thing about the GOP senators pouting and not wanting to work past 2PM?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/24/gop-senators-refusing-to_n_511639.html

can't think of anything (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 29 March 2010 21:57 (fifteen years ago)

i do not see how they think that kind of shit will work in their favor

Mr. Que, Monday, 29 March 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)

lol wish that excuse would fly with my boss

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 29 March 2010 22:00 (fifteen years ago)

Far right wingers might think that's awesome but yeah I can't see refusing to work BY PEOPLE WHO DON'T WANT TO GIVE MONEY & HEALTHCARE TO 'LAZY' POOR PEOPLE is a good example to your electorate.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 29 March 2010 22:05 (fifteen years ago)

Just when you think they can't get any more shameless . . . along comes this.

America’s vigilant Anti-Terror Warriors on the right will certainly be relieved and grateful that the FBI nabbed these guys, right?

Nope.

Glenn Reynolds smells a politically-motivated conspiracy:

THE TIMING APPEARS CONVENIENT: FBI stages domestic raids.

So does American Power:

Hey, is the administration taking after Christian militias to get in good with CAIR and the neo-communist left?

Dan Riehl finds something about the terrorists to praise:

Just three days ago, members of the group were assisting LE in a rescue search. Must be some really evil people there, what?

Classical Values sees nothing illegal going on:

Last time I looked, wanting to start a civil war (insane as it is) was not a crime.

You can hear echoes of “black helicopters” and “Ruby Ridge” and “Waco” in Confederate Yankee’s lament:

I question the wisdom of using such heavy forces (including armored vehicles and helicopters according to witness reports), when light, fast and quiet raids would have been at least as effective. More than the timing, I question the leadership.

And Roy Edroso flagged this reader’s comment at NRO:

We have to take a stand against creeping totalitarianism. I’ll take the risk that the regime will somehow get the NRO donation list and use it to round up the freedom-loving counterrevolutionaries.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 29 March 2010 22:50 (fifteen years ago)

He was going to kill Eric Cantor to impress Eliza Dushku.

Next stop: Blowing up congress unless ilx buys him all of the buffy dvd sets.

ô_o (Nicole), Monday, 29 March 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)

hilarity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFXr3i5_y1A&feature=player_embedded#

Jesus saved fewer people than my Savior Obama will (Dandy Don Weiner), Monday, 29 March 2010 22:59 (fifteen years ago)

I hope you're laughing at the guy constantly saying "I'm listening" (instead of actually listening) but somehow I doubt it

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 29 March 2010 23:03 (fifteen years ago)

Jason Mattera, good luck with the book. I mean that. But that video makes you look like an asshole.

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 23:09 (fifteen years ago)

there are perfectly good answers to his "questions" too, its not like he's playing a particularly perceptive game of "gotcha!" there. Like, infrastructure for childrens' physical activities and promoting breastfeeding are critical to the health of children, which are in the interest of the federal government when its trying to drive down the cost of healthcare (i.e., healthier kids = less strain on the medical insurance industry)

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 29 March 2010 23:12 (fifteen years ago)

like, fat kids are a drain on the economy and a drain on the healthcare system, is it really that hard to grasp.

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 29 March 2010 23:12 (fifteen years ago)

RIP fat kids

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 29 March 2010 23:13 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.fitness.gov/50thanniversary/toolkit-firstfiftyyears.htm

The section under the header "Ronald Reagan" is as long as my arm.

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 23:13 (fifteen years ago)

NOW HOW IS THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY?!

kenan, Monday, 29 March 2010 23:15 (fifteen years ago)

We the people of the United States, in order to ... promote the general welfare"

first paragraph of the Constitution, kids.

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 29 March 2010 23:16 (fifteen years ago)

omg mattera is very special. He has a ton of hugely failed ambush videos on his youtube.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 29 March 2010 23:36 (fifteen years ago)

heaven forbid the government support breastfeeding

what a douche

akm, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 05:15 (fifteen years ago)

also, I do not think it meant 'infrastructure' in the manner in which he is reading it.

akm, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 05:15 (fifteen years ago)

first paragraph of the Constitution, kids.

It's important to let folks know the first word is WE and not I.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 06:00 (fifteen years ago)

also, I do not think it meant 'infrastructure' in the manner in which he is reading it.

― akm, Tuesday, March 30, 2010 5:15 AM (52 minutes ago) Bookmark

yeah, jungle gyms are really more just "structures." Maybe extrastructure.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 06:08 (fifteen years ago)

YEAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

max, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 11:14 (fifteen years ago)

Caterpillar's such a sterling example of a company with thoughtful commitment to employee benefits as well; these congressmen are lucky to have them around to bring such important issues as this to their attention

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 11:17 (fifteen years ago)

GUESS YOUVE NEVER HEARD OF A FORM 8-K, "TRACER HAND"

max, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 11:19 (fifteen years ago)

you forgot to post a grainy, unflattering photo of myself, "MAX"

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 11:20 (fifteen years ago)

i think i have one of you though

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 11:20 (fifteen years ago)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2717/4320746266_8d3593a016.jpg

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 11:21 (fifteen years ago)

IVE BEEN REFUTED

max, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 11:26 (fifteen years ago)

i'm just impressed that tracer rushed out to commit graffiti to prove a point.

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 11:30 (fifteen years ago)

hes got a quick response team

max, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 11:32 (fifteen years ago)

tracer's house:

http://www.zoestrauss.com/photo/gallery4/images/08.jpg

caek, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 11:33 (fifteen years ago)

tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime, not so tough on plasterwork and general maintenance

Jermaine Jenason (darraghmac), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 11:35 (fifteen years ago)

degradation caused by the cigarettes of worthless junkies

harry lame irl (Curt1s Stephens), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 11:38 (fifteen years ago)

more quality GOP race-baiting

surprised he didn't just out and out call Obama "uppity"

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

that is just sad

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:24 (fifteen years ago)

jesus crist

max, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

it is kind of weird to have a president who reads i guess

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

haha Max

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

America just isn't ready for a president who can read

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

arggh, thanks for linking to fucking Politico.

while on that shitforsaken site I read their "article" about Romney and health care, and it did provide a minor lol in this sentence:

"Now, though, groups such as the Club for Growth are hammering Romneycare largely because of its mandate, and some grass-roots conservatives believe the idea is antithetical to basic freedoms such as free will."

"Basic freedoms such as free will"...see, whoever said thinking about philosophy is good for nothing?

lube and (Euler), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

What a disaster for reading.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)

"He can go as fast as the speed of light and has no idea what he’s saying..."

Uh, takes one to know one, buddy. Oops, I meant Bud Day.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)

In other news: a history of Obama looking at mundane things.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)

don't really understand why http://www.nwfdailynews.com/news/day-27423-charlie-senate.html would report those comments without, uh, comment

caek, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)

I don't disagree that the general level of writing on Politico is pathetic but they do get some gems

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

some grass-roots conservatives believe the idea is antithetical to basic freedoms such as free will.

Well, since Obama just made the universe deterministic, I'm just gonna do whatever the hell I want and not feel bad about it.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

I don't really get the "free will" attack politically: is this supposed to appeal to young voters who don't want to pay for insurance? How big is that group? My impression is that pretty much everyone I know, young or old, wants health insurance, and is willing to pay decent coin for it...but maybe I don't know the right kinds of people.

lube and (Euler), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

it's supposed to appeal to people who like the sound of the words "free" and "will" without any understanding of what the term actually means

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

people, stop a moment and marvel at Alfred's fucking amazing link

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

I mean srsly. It's a great tonic!

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

its hard out here for a war criminal

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

Alfred's link is a delight

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

yesh well done

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

omg I have already changed my screen name twice but I really want to be "you totally ruined a country"

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

lots of potential wallpaper options.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

“You’ve got the black one with the reading thing. He can go as fast as the speed of light and has no idea what he’s saying,” Day said. “I put Rubio in that same category, except I don’t know if he’s using one of those readers.”

are you fucking kidding me

way to get J0hn D. to donate to the nearest ActBlue campaign, dickhead

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

Alfred's link: amazing indeed!

Also, a variant:

http://deantrippe.tumblr.com/tagged/awesome_things

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)

"They don't believe in dialogue. They don't believe in courtesy. They don't believe in First Amendment rights for anyone but themselves," he said.

How dearly I cherish my First Amendment right to conduct a fucking book signing.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

this from the guy who's VP said "go fuck yourself" on the Senate floor

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)

he was OUR veep, Shakey. Dick Cheney belongs to all of us.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

like syphilis

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 15:54 (fifteen years ago)

"At one point, Jodie Evans, the co-founder of the anti-war group Code Pink, rushed toward Rove waving a pair of handcuffs...."

sounds like a night out for Michael Steele

lube and (Euler), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

video here: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/03/30/rove_shouted_down_called_war_criminal_at_book_signing.html

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

lollllllllllllllllll

"Let's bitch about our annoying roommates"

http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/03/leboon-arrested-in-09-for-threatening-to-have-gabriel-the-angel-kill-his-roommate.php?ref=fpblg

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:08 (fifteen years ago)

"you either clean your dishes or i'm getting archangel on your ass"

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

schizophrenia, it is a bitch

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

can't even keep his archangels straight (Michael's the avenging one!)

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:12 (fifteen years ago)

Gabe's just the messenger

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

president barack obama: the black one with the reading thing.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

tbh I would be pretty fucking pleased with myself if my thing could read

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

you could read two things at once!

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

Really changes the whole Groucho Marx, "...inside a dog, it's too dark to read," joke.

xpost

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

As an aside, I just started reading this. It's a pretty good article on how other countries use social funding for musicians and it talks about health care a bit too.
http://pitchfork.com/features/articles/7776-whats-the-matter-with-sweden/

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

i mean the thing about crist is that hes not even the far-right dude in the race--like his strategy should be to wait for rubios campaign to say something idiotic and racist, not try and coopt their implicit racism with explicit racism

max, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

Crist's desperation in the last few days has been something to see. I haven't seen the ads yet.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

it is INSANE to me that he hasnt decided to run as an independent

max, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

is "the reading thing" a reference to use of omgz0r teleprompters?

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

Sarah Palin writes all her speeches on her hand, she don't need no librul teleprompter

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

kind of envious that conservatives can rile their base over a teleprompter and convince them it is obama's thing.

for me to chilt on (bnw), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

i think the nub of it is that He Speaks So Well that we are all too bedazzled to realize our freedumz being stolen right from under our noses

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

right. because you know who else beguiles with pretty-sounding speeches? SATAN, THAT'S WHO.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 16:59 (fifteen years ago)

well, exactly.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)

i mean it's pretty freaking obvious.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe they just don't like the new digital teleprompters.

http://i352.photobucket.com/albums/r325/Ms_Joanne/REAGANTELEPROMPTER.png

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 17:10 (fifteen years ago)

Lookit all the white men.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

it's a pretty amazing remark. i've tried reading it a couple ways but it just comes down to "that black guy has NO RIGHT to read so well."

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 17:13 (fifteen years ago)

Just wanted to point out that this one
http://images.nymag.com/daily/intel/20100217_obamafieldtrips_13.jpg
looks like a scene from Godfather Part II

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

so long diamond Joe...

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 17:15 (fifteen years ago)

"Wanna get lunch or something?"

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 17:16 (fifteen years ago)

That's so rad. The city in the background has a very futuristic look to it also. 2010 hell yes.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 17:19 (fifteen years ago)

Needs one (1) lawn flamingo.

DCLXVI (suzy), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 17:27 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.politico.com/morningscore/0310/morningscore50.html

The RNC has fired the staff member who approved nearly $2,000 in expenses at the nightclub Voyeur West Hollywood. Ken McKay, the RNC's chief of staff, wrote in a committee email obtained by Morning Score: "Our investigation has determined that following a Young Eagles event in Los Angeles, a group of individuals did attend such a club on their own. ... Subsequently, a request for reimbursement to the private individual was submitted by a RNC staff person. That person was aware that this activity was not eligible for reimbursement and had been previously counseled on this very subject. Accordingly, that staff person has been terminated.

previously counseled?

goole, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 18:51 (fifteen years ago)

"don't stick your dick in those holes"

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

aw, we've missed the window on titty-bar reimbursement

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 18:53 (fifteen years ago)

excuse me: BONDAGE titty-bar reimbursement

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 18:54 (fifteen years ago)

Window still open in City of London as far as I can tell. Dan, did you notice the extreme number of 'gentlemen's clubs' near where you were billeted that one time?

DCLXVI (suzy), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

Craven idiot McCain asking Obama to send nat'l guard to Arizona to "defend the border" from illegal immigrants

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

banging that familiar campaign drum, i see

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

kind of amazing that McCain ever got away with portraying himself as principled

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:22 (fifteen years ago)

Must've been all those BBQ's he threw for the press.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

oh man, gross

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

<q>Healthcare reform has been, obviously, a very controversial issue. In Georgia, it's now even led to an effort to impeach the state's attorney general.

Republicans wanted Attorney General Thurbert Baker to join colleagues from more than a dozen other states in suing the federal government over the new law. But Baker, a Democrat who's running for governor this year, refused. (For the record, the consensus among legal scholars, even some on the right, seems to be that these suits have little chance of succeeding.)

That's led to some efforts to get around him -- incumbent Gov. Sonny Perdue, a Republican, came up with the idea of appointing a "special attorney general" to file suit instead -- and one effort to just get him out of office altogether. Today, one member of the state legislature reportedly filed articles of impeachment against Baker.

http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/03/30/georgia/index.html<;/q>

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

lol html fail

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

there is a point where it all has to backfire, right? like instead of something for everyone he manages to look pathetic to LITERALLY every single american, for different reasons

xps

goole, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

wait did he like physically hulk out and throw BBQs at them? that would be awesome.

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:25 (fifteen years ago)

Senator Meatflinger

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

did he bring his own hose?

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

McCain can't really throw anything, tossing's about the best he can do

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

He threw the RNC under the bus.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:29 (fifteen years ago)

fwiw I used to feel bad about making McCain-torture-injury jokes but since he's cool with torturing other people I figure hey fair game

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

i hope mccain loses but its crazy that democrats arent running a strong candidate in AZ. maybe there isnt a strong dem candidate in AZ.

max, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

btw the "lets get our AGs to sue the federal gov't craze" is one of those "this would be hilarious if it wasnt real" things thats seemed to define the republican party for the last decade

max, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

congrat

☀ ☃ (am0n), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

Passover is a time of remembrance and thanks. This festival provides us all - Jewish, Christian and all faiths - an opportunity to reflect on the challenges we have faced and the triumphs we have achieved together. It is also a reminder of the resilient spirit that has carried people through trials of every kind through every generation.
This week, as we break bread and spend time with our families and friends, I hope we also take a moment to say a word of thanks for our freedom and for those who have given their lives in freedom's name. Let us also look ahead with hope to the opportunities to come.

Best wishes for a safe and happy holiday.

Sincerely,

Carly Fiorina

max, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

btw the "lets get our AGs to sue the federal gov't craze" is one of those "this would be hilarious if it wasnt real" things thats seemed to define the republican party for the last decade

Eliot Spitzer's latest Slate column is about this. Kind of interesting reading:

Even as politics, the states' lawsuit against health care reform makes no sense

o. nate, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

Hope that bread she's breaking is UNLEAVENED.

DCLXVI (suzy), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

i hope mccain loses but its crazy that democrats arent running a strong candidate in AZ. maybe there isnt a strong dem candidate in AZ.

in AZ as in CA what people are actually voting on imo is property tax. maybe a little more border-security stuff for the retired folks in AZ but tax is the issue, property property property, and the Republicans control the dialogue on that stuff. you'd need a Dem who believes in property tax cuts (which are disastrous in the long term) to win AZ

imo

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

hahahahaha

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 21:19 (fifteen years ago)

don't give away my daugters

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 21:25 (fifteen years ago)

Just coming here to post that. "Teabonics"

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

dear carly fiorina: fuck you 2x

Today, Fiorina's campaign clarified the earlier release. “We meant all bread, leavened and unleavened, and matzo is just unleavened bread so that’s what we meant by that,” Fiorina campaign spokeswoman Amy Thoma said.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2010/03/fiorina-spokewoman-clarifies-breadbreaking-remarks.html

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

Jesus CNN Wolf Blitzer is on right now talking about the Tea Party and just used the words "Grass Roots"?

Yeah Dick Armey is really just a Washington outsider. Ignore his 25 years in congress. Also Sarah Palin wasn't almost Vice President of the United States 2 years ago.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

frat pwns glen beck supporters!

http://gawker.com/5505615/someone-acorn-tows-53-cars-during-glenn-beck-show

can't think of anything (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

man i have caught the business end of a snow emergency and i don't wish that kind of shit on anyone. it is literally like a gulag.

goole, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

yeah the mpls impound lot after a snow emergency is just beyond bad vibes

can't think of anything (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

this is the guy that drives you out to your car basically

http://www.hauntedamericatours.com/occult/GatesofHell/charon.jpg

goole, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

Gawker commenters are disgusting savages.

FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT! FIST FIGHT IN THE PARKING LOT! (milo z), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

yessssssss

fat mantis (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 22:01 (fifteen years ago)

We meant all bread, leavened and unleavened

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 22:24 (fifteen years ago)

We meant all cocks, circumcised and uncircumcised

goole, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 22:25 (fifteen years ago)

http://i.thisislondon.co.uk/i/pix/2009/10/FrontCapaldi415.jpg

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 30 March 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)

Via Steve Benen:

Prominent right-wing voices decided last year that the U.S. census was not to be trusted. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) said the process could lead to "internment camps." Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) called the census "invasive." Fox News' Glenn Beck's suggested Americans may not be comfortable with "ACORN members" collecting information. Radio host Neal Boortz said some census information is "designed to help the government steal from you in order to pass off your property to the moochers."

No one should be surprised, then, that the spread of right-wing paranoia over the census is having an effect. (via Daily Kos)

Contrary to historical trends, some of the toughest challenges facing the agency responsible for measuring the nation's population are not from counting the traditionally undercounted groups such as African-Americans and Latinos. Instead, a new and growing threat to an accurate national head count is coming from anti-government conservatives who may not fill out their forms to protest against "Big Brother" in Washington.

The Houston Chronicle's report looks specifically at Texas, which is counting on the census to gain additional House seats, electoral votes, and federal funding relating to transportation, agriculture, health, education, and housing

But some anti-government types are shooting themselves in the foot.

The national average on the return rate for census forms is 34%. In much of Texas, the more Republican the area, the lower the return rate. In Briscoe County in the Panhandle, McCain/Palin won nearly 75% of the vote -- and 8% of locals are sending in their census materials. In King County, near Lubbock, McCain/Palin won nearly 93% of the vote -- and only 5% of locals are answering the census.

They apparently have no idea that they're acting against their own interests.

Last July, some very conservative Republican House members urged Bachmann, in particular, to back off the anti-census crusade, calling the efforts "illogical."

It seems at least some parts of the Republican base haven't gotten the message.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 23:41 (fifteen years ago)

Hilarious. In further "they apparently have no idea that they're acting against their own interests" news:

...a Gallup survey found that 57 percent of white respondents said that the bill would help the uninsured, and 52 percent said that it would improve conditions for low-income families. Only a third of whites thought it would benefit the country, and shockingly, only 20 percent thought it would benefit their family...

Those doubts were especially pronounced among white voters with less than a college education, Gallup found...

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/03/29/white_voters_and_health_care_reform/index.html

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 23:45 (fifteen years ago)

kinda makes me think of this...

http://www.grandin.com/gifs/chute.ramp.race.design.jpg

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 23:45 (fifteen years ago)

wait is that really how those work? dang

drink more beer and the doctor is a heghog (gbx), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 23:49 (fifteen years ago)

Bachmann's seat is up for grabs due to the local population changes, isn't it? Better discredit that process as much as possible.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Tuesday, 30 March 2010 23:58 (fifteen years ago)

oh well, whatever, nevermind
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2010/03/obamacare-by-the-numbers-part-1.html
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2010/03/obamacare-by-the-numbers-part-2.html

Jesus saved fewer people than my Savior Obama will (Dandy Don Weiner), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 01:20 (fifteen years ago)

I don't know whether to be shocked that the avg US family brings in 50,000 US or the fact that my worldview is so misinformed by living in NYC that I can't imagine 4 people living off of 50,000 US

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 01:26 (fifteen years ago)

a mulatto

an albino

a mosquito

my libido

hey

max, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 01:27 (fifteen years ago)

not sure if this is for here or elsewhere, but w -- t -- f tom friedman?!?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 31 March 2010 01:37 (fifteen years ago)

his comment is absurd and pathetic.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 31 March 2010 01:37 (fifteen years ago)

wow i never though tom friedman was all that great but wow

horseshoe, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 01:46 (fifteen years ago)

^^^

pity alla those people had to die so that we could export bubble theory around the world

egregious apostrophising (schlump), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 01:49 (fifteen years ago)

Why are you guys shocked? This loathsome tool said in 2003 that we needed to invade Iraq to kick some ass.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 01:51 (fifteen years ago)

and he's said it many times since. I guess this shocks Yglesias.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 01:55 (fifteen years ago)

i don't think it shocked yglesias. he only posted it because the first few people to comment on the initial post didn't understand the reference in the title ("suck it"). i didn't either, frankly.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 31 March 2010 02:17 (fifteen years ago)

it really bothers me that otherwise reasonable people like Maddow, Maher, etc. respect the opinions of Tom Friedman. I wouldn't trust that guy's advice on anything. And aside from that, he's a truly abysmal writer.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 02:20 (fifteen years ago)

i can't stand friedman, but i think that "suck on this" clip is at least an honest explanation of what that whole fiasco was all about.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 02:28 (fifteen years ago)

you don't think there was a personal vendetta by GWB at work, or perhaps a desire by GWB to top his father by finishing unfinished business?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 31 March 2010 02:49 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, you're probably right, but it's impossible to know the right answer for sure.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 31 March 2010 02:49 (fifteen years ago)

i think "suck on this" sort of covers all of that, really. it's a pretty concise if not elegant elucidation of the dick cheney worldview.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 03:03 (fifteen years ago)

btw, in re steele and the lesbian bondage club, jon stewart went with the headline "2 Girls, 1 GOP." which made me lol a little.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 03:07 (fifteen years ago)

i guess my tendency to glaze over when trying to read friedman kept me from realizing he was such a wholehearted proponent of the dick cheney worldview

horseshoe, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 03:08 (fifteen years ago)

their fake NYT headlines were loll too

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 03:08 (fifteen years ago)

yeah yglesias has been dragging out the "suck on this" line for years. tom friedman is awful, even on the things he is supposedly not awful about. "global warming is bad, too bad we don't have an all-powerful chinese government to dictate solutions by fiat, instead we have a deadlocked congress!! ps what is the deal with liberals?? we need more centrists" uhh they give pulitzers for this garbage?

goole, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 03:10 (fifteen years ago)

so creepily into his own gross delivery in that clip

horseshoe, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 03:11 (fifteen years ago)

LOL @ Daily Show headline:

2 Girls One GOP

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 03:11 (fifteen years ago)

Log Grabbin Republicans

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 03:12 (fifteen years ago)

i guess my tendency to glaze over when trying to read friedman kept me from realizing he was such a wholehearted proponent of the dick cheney worldview

more like he had a brief, sordid affair with it. think of dick cheney as glenn close and tom friedman as michael douglas. and iraq as the bunny.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 03:19 (fifteen years ago)

i fucking hate michael douglas, so done and done.

horseshoe, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 03:20 (fifteen years ago)

more like he had a brief, sordid affair with it. think of dick cheney as glenn close and tom friedman as michael douglas. and iraq as the bunny.

― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, March 31, 2010 3:19 AM (44 seconds ago) Bookmark

Friedman's affair with horribly mangled metaphors will be lifelong, however.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 03:21 (fifteen years ago)

so creepily into his own gross delivery in that clip

omg this is so otm.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 31 March 2010 03:25 (fifteen years ago)

"Why, you see . . ." (slowly waives hands in broad circle)

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 31 March 2010 03:25 (fifteen years ago)

true story from my recently concluded nyt copyediting days: there was some friedman column where he was completely misusing a figure of speech in the lede. i called the oped desk and said, "he's using this figure of speech completely wrong." and the oped desk guy said, "yeah, we told him. he said that's the way he wants it." so. what tom wants, tom gets.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 03:26 (fifteen years ago)

"As with a rolling stone that gathers no moss, the health-care bill is hopelessly stalled in Congress."

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 31 March 2010 03:29 (fifteen years ago)

Drill baby drill
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/31/science/earth/31energy.html?emc=na

Jesus saved fewer people than my Savior Obama will (Dandy Don Weiner), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 04:10 (fifteen years ago)

Who wants to bet Sarah Palin will spin this against him when her Alaska reality show gets on the air? I can just hear "Obama wants to destroy the natural beauty of my home state", in that shrill, affected voice of hers...

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 04:21 (fifteen years ago)

Apparently not, actually:

Unlike the Bush plan, however, Mr. Obama’s proposal would put Bristol Bay, home to major Alaskan commercial fisheries and populations of endangered whales, off limits to oil rigs.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 04:34 (fifteen years ago)

Though it is nice that Sarah named a bay after her estranged not-quite-son-in-law.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 04:34 (fifteen years ago)

Friedman clip is damning; many chicken-hawks got fucked in the ear by bush/cheney so I have some sympathy (my ear is still sore). but yglesias saying: "Just keep in mind that Friedman is a lot more influential than the second-most-influential commentator on foreign policy in the United States. The gap in influence and profile between him and the second guy is gigantic" is also misleading and overblown on several fronts.

for me to chilt on (bnw), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 04:35 (fifteen years ago)

Also, why is it the second 'guy'

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 04:37 (fifteen years ago)

who is this mysterious second personage

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 04:50 (fifteen years ago)

Swimming Without a Suit

By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN

Speaking of financial crises and how they can expose weak companies and weak countries, Warren Buffett once famously quipped that “only when the tide goes out do you find out who is not wearing a bathing suit.” So true. But what’s really unnerving is that America appears to be one of those countries that has been swimming buck naked — in more ways than one.

Credit bubbles are like the tide. They can cover up a lot of rot.

---

seriously, how fucking dumb do you have to be to write that shit?

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 08:09 (fifteen years ago)

his alltime best:

“It’s the latest version of the longest-running play in the modern Middle East, which, if I were to give it a title, would be called: “Who owns this hotel? Can the Jews have a room? And shouldn’t we blow up the bar and replace it with a mosque?”

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 08:12 (fifteen years ago)

Hahaha HCR is apparently racist due to tax on tanning salons... o_O

anatol_merklich, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 08:21 (fifteen years ago)

“It’s the latest version of the longest-running play in the modern Middle East, which, if I were to give it a title, would be called: “Who owns this hotel? Can the Jews have a room? And shouldn’t we blow up the bar and replace it with a mosque?”

"Am I even here now? What week is it? I'm Tom Friedman. I was talking to a taxi driver in Dubai yesterday. He taught me more about the global economy in five minutes than any of you could ever learn in your entire lives. Here what he said: A penny saved isn't a penny earned. It's a penny learned. That's why we need to create 'thin cities' made of polycarbon sheeting and guarded by solar-powered 'green nukes'. If we don't do it, that taxi driver will. And that can never be allowed to happen."

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 08:51 (fifteen years ago)

LOLLLLLL

DCLXVI (suzy), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 08:55 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha

caek, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 10:21 (fifteen years ago)

beautiful

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 10:55 (fifteen years ago)

you have to hand it to tom--it is no easy feat being the absolute worst ny times columnist--and for a while him and kristol were neck and neck--but now that kristols gone its like a whole new world, not even dowd or douthat can approach him

max, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 11:40 (fifteen years ago)

pretty sure Al Gore woulda gone into Iraq eventually, guys.

and back to today, offshore drilling! Third Bush term continues.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 11:53 (fifteen years ago)

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_XuS8IoC4Xr4/SOoiTwqwhhI/AAAAAAAAADY/C4tJ2KsKdwo/s400/sarah+palin+wink.jpg

lube and (Euler), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 11:58 (fifteen years ago)

more to the point:

http://irregulartimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/oilyobama.jpg

lube and (Euler), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 12:01 (fifteen years ago)

pretty sure al gore would have awarded reparations to the descendents of slaves eventually, guys

max, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 12:07 (fifteen years ago)

America: swimming buck naked -in more ways than one.

gelatinous rube (brownie), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:16 (fifteen years ago)

Are all puns automatically stupid? Because I'm trying to see exactly why that particular paragraph is so incredibly dumb and there doesn't really seem to be any reason other than "ugh I hate Friedman so much".

(the other example, OTOH, is pretty dumb)

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:22 (fifteen years ago)

What pun

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:25 (fifteen years ago)

"buck naked" (ie, without clothes or, in the case of America's financial situation, without cash)

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:26 (fifteen years ago)

dying @ Tracer

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:31 (fifteen years ago)

That's a pun?

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:32 (fifteen years ago)

play on words, then; you know what I mean

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:32 (fifteen years ago)

swimming buck naked -in more ways than one

i just hate the "in more ways than one" part. also hate the swimming buck naked part, which i didn't realize was a pun

gelatinous rube (brownie), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:33 (fifteen years ago)

it's a pun -in more ways than one

gelatinous rube (brownie), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:34 (fifteen years ago)

HOW IS THAT A PUN OR A PLAY ON WORDS??

i feel like the last third of flowers for algernon here

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:35 (fifteen years ago)

"buck" as in dollar bill, "buck naked" as in "without bucks"

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:36 (fifteen years ago)

it is somewhat disturbing to be the only person who immediately understood that

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:36 (fifteen years ago)

I am so buck naked right now guys

harry lame irl (Curt1s Stephens), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:40 (fifteen years ago)

oh ok .. hmm. i think "more ways than one" threw me. like if i were to say "mmm.. boy this cheese sure is GOUDA! in more ways than one." then, well you'd practically be obliged to whack me in the eyes with a large canoe paddle.

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:42 (fifteen years ago)

It would hurt to be paddled...in more ways than one.

Religious Embolism (WmC), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:50 (fifteen years ago)

yer right Euler, Bam = Palin on offshore drilling, highfive.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)

what is the other way that the united states is buck naked, besides the way where they are "naked" of "bucks"

max, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)

he is referencing the quote he stole the phrase "buck naked" from

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:53 (fifteen years ago)

our buck-like aggression and territorial dominance is naked for the world to see, do u see

Religious Embolism (WmC), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:53 (fifteen years ago)

what quote

max, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:54 (fifteen years ago)

http://i.usatoday.net/communitymanager/_photos/pop-candy/2009/10/30/buckx-large.jpg

^^^^pancake is a metaphor for america; the pancake is being turned over by "uncle buck"

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:55 (fifteen years ago)

but he's got clothes on

Religious Embolism (WmC), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:56 (fifteen years ago)

so he is basically saying "buck naked" metaphorically ie exposed with all of the dumb credit tricks (as alluded to by the Buffet quote) etc and "buck naked" literally ie "naked" of "bucks"

btw I never asked to think like Tom Friedman, this is probably more upsetting for me than anyone else

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:56 (fifteen years ago)

the snow shovel is the economy

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:56 (fifteen years ago)

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

max, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:56 (fifteen years ago)

TY DAN

max, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:56 (fifteen years ago)

I believe it's a sly reference to Canadian pop-punk superstar Biff Naked.

congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 13:57 (fifteen years ago)

the game of cash-on-hand:

http://images2.dailykos.com/images/user/3/RNC_COH.gif

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 14:31 (fifteen years ago)

can I have some of that money, I filled my shopping card with 100 bucks worth of vinyl at nwn this morning & then realized that was pretty extravagant given my due-and-payables but with some of that sweet c.o.h. I could really go on a damn spending spree

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)

will vote for the first political party to supplement my need for kvlt vinyl tbh

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)

hmm what is with the RNC drop between sept and oct 09?

goole, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 14:44 (fifteen years ago)

rnc only reimburses for vinyl in the form of fetish gear, sorry john

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 14:45 (fifteen years ago)

well you know the cleaning charges are spiraling outta control anyway so I'll take what I can get. go sarah!

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)

I never asked to think like Tom Friedman, this is probably more upsetting for me than anyone else

― STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:56 PM (47 minutes ago) Bookmark

lol

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 14:49 (fifteen years ago)

will vote for the first political party to supplement my need for kvlt vinyl tbh

will vote for the first political party to put the Psychedelic Furs in the studio with a good producer.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)

goole, i'm not recalling anything specific that would account for that spending spree -- anyone? -- but perhaps that just suggests the depth of the shit michael steele is currently in.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:00 (fifteen years ago)

the august recess was WHEN THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SPOKE, if u recall. so most likely the RNC spent a shitload of money over the summer pimping that stuff and the bills came due. mobs aren't free amirite.

or maybe donor energy started going toward the tea party type groups (the astroturfy as well as OG ones) and away from the RNC itself? very interesting.

goole, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:11 (fifteen years ago)

lol

Pornography [Kathryn Jean Lopez]

is quietly tearing at the time, efficiency, and souls of young men, families, and workplaces today. It wasn't invented recently, of course, but it's availability is unlike ever before, in ways many, I assume, wouldn't quite care to imagine. It's frequently not talked about a lot — often for understandable reasons. (Pamela Paul, Mary Eberstadt, Laura Ingraham, and Mona Charen are some notable exceptions.) When I recently went to a press conference for a Witherspoon Institute study on its social costs, a man walked in, stayed a few, and announced, "I expected to be much more titillated by this than I am." And there we are. It's dangerous stuff and, well, I'll go ahead and let you read the story of one wife and mother. I'd be curious for your thoughts — maybe especially from men.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:12 (fifteen years ago)

irl trolling!!

goole, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)

For the last year, liberals cosseted by total control of Washington have insisted that it is the right that is overcome with the paranoid style of American politics. And to be sure, there are some overly conspiratorial guys on the right. But for sheer hysteria and paranoia, how can anything on the right compare to the cries of "kristallnacht!" belching forth from establishment liberals? Frank Rich played the Kristallnacht card as did John Avlon of the Daily Beast in response to a handful of broken Democratic windows. This is as rational as thinking if an Asian guy steals a comic book from a gas station, it's proof that Genghis Khan is about to invade. It's like a comparing a blackjack dealer shift change at an Indian casino to the Trail of Tears. And yet, these people say it as if conservatives need to apologize for something. Worse, this kind of guilt-by-association routinely passes as intelligent commentary. It's amazing.

jonah goldberg, ladies and gentlemen

goole, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)

a man walked in, stayed a few, and announced, "I expected to be much more titillated by this than I am."

lololololol

caek, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:15 (fifteen years ago)

And there we are.

goole, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:16 (fifteen years ago)

It's frequently not talked about a lot

What a Mobius strip of a sentence.

Women, of course, don't look at porn, not so long as the Brawny paper towel guy and romance novels exist.

xxxp that Goldberg quip is rich coming from someone who has pushed the idea that every time a Muslim burps, the Caliphate is coming to America.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:16 (fifteen years ago)

jonah goldberg is an asshole, and his reasoning is specious but comparing a couple nuts throwing bricks through democratic congresspersons windows to kirstallnacht is nagl imo

max, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)

Worse, this kind of guilt-by-association routinely passes as intelligent commentary. It's amazing.

He must have felt a twinge of irony typing that.

for me to chilt on (bnw), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)

no, it isn't, and you don't have to hunt very hard to find a whole lot of liberals saying "frank rich, wtf relax"

the point is, however, a bunch of dem offices with their windows smashed is a little bit like kristallnacht -- a lot more than an asian guy shoplifting is like genghis khan, or a shift change at a casino is like the trail of tears.

xp

goole, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:24 (fifteen years ago)

The Dems got their windows smashed in BECAUSE THEY ARE DEMOCRATS. Asian guy shoplifting isn't doing it BECAUSE HE'S ASIAN, or at least not in any plausible scenario. Right-wingers discrediting the...not "hate-crime" exactly, although maybe? but identity-based nature of the crimes would really like us all to believe that it wasn't because of the Dems political views that they were targeted, because they'd prefer not to acknowledge that their followers/listeners are WACKO.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)

if an Asian guy steals a comic book from a gas station

marvelling at this hypothetical scenario btw

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)

It's like a comparing a blackjack dealer shift change at an Indian casino to the Trail of Tears.

I just wanted to marvel at this some more.

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

I mean it is basically a hate crime, at least to the extent that it serves as a punishment for identifying w a certain group, and a warning against the victims and other members of the same group, discouraging them from exercising their rights in the future.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

why is jonah using crazily racist caricatures to say that racial paranoia would be unfounded in those extremely baffling examples wtf man what are you trying to even say

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)

Laurel, I got love for you, but that is bullshit. Being a Democrat is an ideological choice. The windows of the Jewish shopkeepers were not smashed because of what they believed, but because of who they were. Politically motivated violence is bogus but kristallnacht is a whole different order of horror and to compare bricks through politicians' windows to it is along the same distasteful line as comparing taxation to slavery.

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)

asians don't steal because they are asian, but they steal COMIC BOOKS because they are asian. see?

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

a non-negligible percentage of people make no distinction between who they are and what they believe; in fact, I think you will find that most people are of the opinion that what they believe makes them who they are

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

that's like comparing a Cuban bumming a cigarette off you to the Bay of Pigs.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

Okay, fine. I'm not really up on what defines a hate crime, except that it's meant to encourage certain desired behaviors from certain groups -- ie the effect is meant to be wider than on the immediate victims.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

No, I think you're right - it's just that there are orders of hate crimes, perhaps.

grobravara hollaglob (dowd), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

it's probably not worth trying to tease out the logic of a jonah goldberg statement, because he is really not very bright.

but yes, he's right (just like all the "wtf frank rich" liberals were, several days ago) that the analogy is so strained as to be irresponsible at best. as j0hn points out there's nothing that really compares with that kind of mania and anti-semitism. and i don't think smashing up political offices is the same thing as smashing up homes and businesses. besides, the underlying story of kristallnacht was that it was NOT spontaneous but was sold as such, right?

but none of HIS examples makes the slightest bit of sense.

[people who don't like democrats] do bad thing, doesn't mean they are [fascists] -- ok true enough
[an asian kid] does a bad thing, doesn't mean he is [genghis khan] -- uh ok i'll follow i guess
[a casino?] does a bad thing (to its native american employees? with... a shift change? what?), doesn't mean it is [genocidal] -- did your mom get you this job or something?

goole, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

btw I agree that comparing what happened to Democrats to Kristallnacht is almost entirely out of order but it certainly isn't a stretch to say that the people who did this were attempting to provoke that type of reaction

[a casino?] does a bad thing (to its native american employees? with... a shift change? what?), doesn't mean it is [genocidal] -- did your mom get you this job or something?

all-time lol

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:44 (fifteen years ago)

I think Rich still thinks he's writing theatre reviews.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:44 (fifteen years ago)

With hyperlinks.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:44 (fifteen years ago)

"The GOP display the other day reminded me of 'Moose Murders'..."

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

And if you haven't read his demolition of said play, you really should:

http://theater.nytimes.com/mem/theater/treview.html?res=9400e3df133bf930a15751c0a965948260

Opened and closed the same night:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moose_Murders

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

eh - the bricks through the windows are weird and scary but wake me up when these people actually come up with a plan.. that's the trouble with these ultra-individualist revolutionaries - they're ideologically opposed to organization!

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

I didn't mean to comment on any comparison to Kristallnacht. I just meant that Righties would like it if the public believed that Dems were targeted because of something they actually did, like "sell out America" or whatever, so that the Right could say, "What do you expect? Nice normal middle-class people have been provoked beyond reasonable tolerance!" But since that is bullshit and they've done no such thing, the truth is that the violence & vandalism is based on politicians being Democrats at all.

I don't think I'm making my thoughts very clear, actually. But oh well.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

no that makes a lot of sense Laurel

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)

the truth is that the violence & vandalism is based on politicians being Democrats at all.

see i don't even think this is true. democrats passed a huge bill! whatever backlash happened/is happening, it's based on reaction to a deed, not identity. and good! like i've said on the hutaree thread, backlashy paranoia is basically a natural fact. we could use more deeds in the meantime.

goole, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

i have a soft spot for frank rich cause his son is really funny

max, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)

http://samuelatgilgal.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/liberal-fascism-58142327.jpg

symsymsym, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)

i dont have a soft spot for john avlon who is just about the least interesting "political commentator" who has ever lived

max, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

goldberg is not a man who should be complaining about anyone else's intemperate comparisons imo

symsymsym, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah I know, goole, that's why it doesn't really work. But the paranoia about the bill is false (at least the stuff the Right would like you to believe -- not that it doesn't have flaws) so anyone who acts on their anger re that paranoia is acting on falsehoods or manufactured facts or whatever you'd call them.

Is there legal protection for that motivation in a courtroom scenario?

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:54 (fifteen years ago)

stupidity? i don't think so.

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

I'm sure the Nazis would say they were responding to "acts" as well.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

iirc in a legal sense 'hate crime' is a crime committed in the context of verbal or written mentions of the victim's race, gender, etc including slurs. and the status as a 'hate crime' is only determined during sentencing. so i don't agree with the expanded social definition of 'hate crime' or that there are degrees thereof. there are crimes of varying repugnance, but 'hate crime' is a binary state.

(just saying, because it real gets to me when outspoken racist paranoids suggest that speaking racial slurs is, per se, a 'hate crime.')

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

really hoping we get more K-Lo thoughts on porn, btw.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

elmo OTM

lol I am basically just here agreeing with everyone and interpreting Tom Friedman

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

should we send K-Lo our thoughts on porn as well

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

go right ahead

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

maybe send her links to tom selleck .jpgs.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 16:02 (fifteen years ago)

A hate crime is usually defined by state law as one that involves threats, harassment, or physical harm and is motivated by prejudice against someone's race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, sexual orientation or physical or mental disability.

Yeah I guess this is like a crime of intolerance in some grey area, political stances not being one of the protected qualities.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

Same database (http://definitions.uslegal.com/h/hate-crime/) sez: The underlying criminal offenses that are designated in hate crime laws include, but are not limited to, crimes against persons like harassment, terroristic threats, assault and crimes against property like criminal trespass, criminal mischief and arson. It may also include Vandalism causing damage to a church, synagogue, cemetery, mortuary, memorial to the dead, school, educational facility, community center, municipal building, courthouse, juvenile detention center, grounds surrounding such places or personal property located within such places.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

same w/genocide, iirc?

xp

drink more beer and the doctor is a heghog (gbx), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

from: twferr✧✧✧@il✧✧✧.c✧✧
to: klo✧✧✧@natlrev✧✧✧.c✧✧

Dear Katherine Jean Lopez,

What are your thoughts on double anal?

Sincerely,

Twink Will Ferrell

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

whoa how'd that happen

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

the stars are twinkles

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

ILX is protecting you from web spiders that want all your tasty email addresses

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

whoa how'd that happen

"What are 'Things You Say After Double Anal', Alex?"

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

ouch how'd that happen

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

hey lets throw some more inflammatory Holocaust rhetoric on the fire why don't we

lol didn't Obama just call for sanctions yesterday wtf

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

"What are 'Things You Say After Double Anal', Alex?"

This would probably make a better Jeopardy round.
"I'll take 'Things You Say After Double Anal' for $400, Alex.'"

kate78, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

"This was happening"

mdskltr (blueski), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

blueski pls fwd your drinks tab to me because that made me lol really hard

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

if it was "Song Titles You Might Say After Double Anal" we could go on for days

"Oops (Oh My)" - Tweet
"Was That What It Was?" - Pet Shop Boys
"No Time To Cry" - Sisters of Mercy
"Good Times" - Spiritualized
"Do It Again" - Steely Dan

etc etc etc

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

has anyone else read the porn article k-lo talked about?

http://article.nationalreview.com/429884/getting-serious-about-pornography/anonymous

it's kind of heartbreaking, mostly stupid

goole, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)

heartbreakingly stupid

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 17:13 (fifteen years ago)

my husband was into porn, then abandoned me to nail some skank

here's some studies from the past ten years saying porn may not be good for you

"the first amendment," horrible thing it is

obama wants to spend billions on "health care", yet there is not a dime to study the scourge of porn

i'll never know if porn made my husband nail that skank...

goole, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 17:18 (fifteen years ago)

"Signed, Bob."

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

SP needs to stop doing drunk status updates.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

btw here's a good article on the similarities between American media fear mongering towards Iran and Iraq

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_MnYI3_FRbbQ/S7M9WsNC2dI/AAAAAAAACXI/iF_YLpCkTNc/s400/iran.png
actual report above

http://www.salon.com/news/iran/index.html?story=/opinion/greenwald/2010/03/31/iran

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 17:22 (fifteen years ago)

LOLnews Loathes Cool James

their use of "fledgling" is a masterpiece of Why One Hates Them

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

I suppose 25 years could be considered "fledgling" if your main acting touchpoint is Methuselah.

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

"However, as it appears that Mr. Smith does not want to be associated with a program that could serve as an inspiration to others..."

rrrrrrrrrrr

goole, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

FoxNews to goole: "lol u mad"

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

i am!

goole, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

hope LL/Sarracuda beef is at least as entertaining as LL/Kool Moe Dee or LL/Canibus

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)

her response rhyme should be fun

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 17:47 (fifteen years ago)

"mr smith" lol

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 17:50 (fifteen years ago)

lookawhat i did i took those ll's, hung em on ya head and rocked your bells

fat mantis (Hunt3r), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

Too many black people call in to C-Span.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YRQlUsdA3U&feature=player_embedded#at=68

wakaflockapitusberry (The Reverend), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

would watch "black-span" tbh

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

^^fr$

wakaflockapitusberry (The Reverend), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 18:26 (fifteen years ago)

It's called BET and it really exists!

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 18:53 (fifteen years ago)

You can't bamboozle me, I know the difference

wakaflockapitusberry (The Reverend), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

who would be on a black span

dream tv lineup--
cornel west
m.e. dyson
michael steele
colin powell
larry elder
armond white

just for the fun of seeing real left brain go up against hilarious right wing demagogues as moderated by armond white

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

and colin powell would be there too

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

kanye duh

Whats with all the littering? (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 19:19 (fifteen years ago)

via TPM:

Lt. Governor Andre Bauer (R-SC) doesn't think the constitutional challenge to health care reform by state Attorneys General will succeed.

Instead, he has proposed "a surefire way" to stop the health care bill from being instated -- another Constitutional Convention.

Last week, Bauer sent a letter to the South Carolina General Assembly asking for support for a resolution to call a convention, where the states will "make amendment to the constitution to reverse the dangerous action taken by Obama and Congress."

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

this guy's just fucking with us ... right?

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

http://www2.nationalreview.com/ads/images/ad_UK_300x300_03-29-10.jpg

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

Lt. Gov. is basically a sinecure, yeah?

wakaflockapitusberry (The Reverend), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

The Corner's nicely recovered from its slump:

Campaigning On Fear [Jonah Goldberg]

Remember how the worst thing George W. Bush and Karl Rove did was "practice the politics of fear"? Remember how Al Gore (one of the most accomplished fearmongers in modern political history, at least on the topic of global warming) insisted that Bush was using "fear as a political tool." Well, say what you will about that, at least Bush said we should be afraid of actual terrorists who had a proven ability and desire to kill Americans. The Democratic Party is now using fear as a political tool, but they say you should be afraid of fellow Americans and is perfectly willing to insinuate they're terrorists, too.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)

Al Gore (one of the most accomplished fearmongers in modern political history, at least on the topic of global warming)

this is awesome

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

holy shit

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

Papa John (one of the most accomplished chefs in modern culinary history, at least on the topic of pizza)

hipster puddy (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

rev: apparently dude is campaigning to be the actual governor atm

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

who would be on a black span

What's up with that?

kenan, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

fear of a black span

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

from: The Desk of Mr. Smith
to: Punks at Fox News

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fARpKl1Bsc&feature=related

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

The Democratic Party is now using fear as a political tool, but they say you should be afraid of fellow Americans and is perfectly willing to insinuate they're terrorists, too.

Yeah, how can they possibly be terrorists? They are white Christians, ppl!

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 20:55 (fifteen years ago)

Well, say what you will about that, but

A+ argument tactic.

for me to chilt on (bnw), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 20:58 (fifteen years ago)

Al Gore (one of the most accomplished fearmongers in modern political history, at least on the topic of global warming)

it's true. gore's been a machiavellian manipulator ever since he invented the internet.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 31 March 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

rev: apparently dude is campaigning to be the actual governor atm

― elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:25 PM Bookmark

I would have assumed so. I hear this guy is basically the reason Sanford hasn't resigned.

wakaflockapitusberry (The Reverend), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDI1OGZmY2VkNDEyZTI5YjgwOTUwNWU2MTRmMzBiNjk=

potty mouth!

goole, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 22:15 (fifteen years ago)

sorry, that's "potty-mouth"

goole, Wednesday, 31 March 2010 22:15 (fifteen years ago)

I was just trying to find a way to post jpeg of the shirt, which is LULZ.

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 22:17 (fifteen years ago)

Looks like Toby Keith and LL have something in common...

Likewise, Toby Keith never sat down with Sarah Palin, Keith's spokesman told HifFix. "We were never contacted by Fox," Keith's spokesman said. "I have no idea what interview it's taken from. They're promoting this like it's a brand new interview."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/31/ll-cool-j-vs-fox-news-sar_n_520035.html

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Wednesday, 31 March 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)

i forget which thread the original was on, but:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/dryponder/sets/72157623726710218/

drink more beer and the doctor is a heghog (gbx), Thursday, 1 April 2010 01:25 (fifteen years ago)

real lolz at godzilla skyline

fat mantis (Hunt3r), Thursday, 1 April 2010 02:15 (fifteen years ago)

get the feeling he would/will love those seeing as how big of a nerd he is

for me to chilt on (bnw), Thursday, 1 April 2010 02:22 (fifteen years ago)

if it was "Song Titles You Might Say After Double Anal" we could go on for days

"Shot By Both Sides"

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 1 April 2010 02:28 (fifteen years ago)

Stall, Baby, Stall [Sarah Palin]

Many Americans fear that President Obama’s new energy proposal is once again “all talk and no real action,” this time in an effort to shore up fading support for the Democrats’ job-killing cap-and-trade (a.k.a. cap-and-tax) proposals. Behind the rhetoric lie new drilling bans and leasing delays; soon to follow are burdensome new environmental regulations. Instead of “drill, baby, drill,” the more you look into this the more you realize it’s “stall, baby, stall.”

Today the president said he’ll “consider potential areas for development in the mid and south Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico, while studying and protecting sensitive areas in the Arctic.” As the former governor of one of America’s largest energy-producing states, a state oil and gas commissioner, and chair of the nation’s Interstate Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, I’ve seen plenty of such studies. What we need is action — action that results in the job growth and revenue that a robust drilling policy could provide. And let’s not forget that while Interior Department bureaucrats continue to hold up actual offshore drilling from taking place, Russia is moving full steam ahead on Arctic drilling, and China, Russia, and Venezuela are buying leases off the coast of Cuba.

lol now she loves the commies

k3vin k., Thursday, 1 April 2010 02:58 (fifteen years ago)

not love, she sees them as having an advantage in acquiring a strategic resource; we're in competition & bureaucrats are losing us the game etc

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 1 April 2010 03:29 (fifteen years ago)

who would be on a black span

dream tv lineup--
cornel west
m.e. dyson

i saw these two on tv tonight, it was excellent. (earlier this evening - on the tavis smiley program (pbs), a full hour on MLK's 1967 speech about the vietnam war - check it out if you can, they interview a bunch of people).

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Thursday, 1 April 2010 03:38 (fifteen years ago)

a refreshing change from too much cable news. that mattera guy you linked upthread who is trying to make obnoxious ambush videos of sen. franken and others, he was on o'reilly show tonight. o'reilly played the thing and made a show of explaining to him that you had to be respectful, and what was the correct way to do ambush interviews. mattera's eyebrows, they are very sculpted.

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Thursday, 1 April 2010 03:53 (fifteen years ago)

Ha. I bought some laptop gear offa a guy on CL tonight and he had Oreilly on, with that dude trying SO DAMN HARD to get approval.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Thursday, 1 April 2010 05:10 (fifteen years ago)

You Can’t Make This Up [Shannen Coffin]
(...)The total postage and fees for my federal return, addressed to the Internal Revenue Service Center in Kansas City, was $6.66. ’Nuff said.

you can't make this stuff up, folks! taxes = satan! am i right or am i right??? 'nuff said! lolol

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:04 (fifteen years ago)

You actually could make that up, if you had very low standards for the kind of thing you'd make up.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:10 (fifteen years ago)

so umm the whole drilling thing kinda sucks doesn't it

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:28 (fifteen years ago)

where's max? I wanna tousle.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:29 (fifteen years ago)

drilling thing sucks

Mr. Que, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:32 (fifteen years ago)

my gut instinct is that no drilling is that great, but are there any significant environmental impacts off the southeastern seaboard? if it can be done without causing a biological fracas then why not

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:33 (fifteen years ago)

OMG the hilarity of retardation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNZczIgVXjg&feature=player_embedded

Jesus saved fewer people than my Savior Obama will (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:34 (fifteen years ago)

Drilling thing sucks. Have noticed the drilling is mostly happening off red-state coastlines.

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:35 (fifteen years ago)

^^^^^^^^ obama has said as much, i think

Mr. Que, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:36 (fifteen years ago)

where's max? I wanna tousle.

as the other democratic apologist I can do the touslin

I think it's good politics and probably a necessary move to get other shit done

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:37 (fifteen years ago)

man

max, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:37 (fifteen years ago)

"my fear is that the whole island will become overly populated and tip over and capsize".

HOLY SHIT.

Jesus saved fewer people than my Savior Obama will (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:37 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, I can live with tar on my beach as long as the Dems win seats in November.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)

I'm very certain I know people who voted for Hank Johnson. Good god.

Jesus saved fewer people than my Savior Obama will (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)

i am an apologist for

  • the health-care bill & the surrounding legislative process
  • centrist democrats from right-leaning constituencies
dont look to me if u want defenses of off-shore drilling or unfettered executive power

max, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)

The political calculation that this will somehow either get Republican votes for a climate bill and/or get Dems and Obama support from independents because they will perceive Obama as taking a middle ground between lefties and righties, seems off to me. I bet they'll get no such Republican votes and Obama won't get any credit for being some kind of a sensible non-partisan type for those who allegedly salivate about such things. I do not think either thing will happen. And from what I have read, there's such a tiny amount of oil percentage-wise available off of US coasts, that they're just kidding themselves when they say this will help us ween ourselves off of foreign oil and energy. I have read that there is concern for environmental damage off the Virginia coast.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)

and wait alfred did u want to tousle my hair? or what

max, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:39 (fifteen years ago)

I bet they'll get no such Republican votes and Obama won't get any credit for being some kind of a sensible non-partisan type for those who allegedly salivate about such things.

otm. this sucks, btw.

horseshoe, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:39 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, guys, it's "tussle." /pedant

horseshoe, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)

I think it's good politics and probably a necessary move to get other shit done

so tired of this line

every single time he directly goes back on something he said we get this break a few eggs business

moving past fossil fuel was a huge talking point for this guy when he was running for office. lol @ dummies who thought that meant anything other than "donate to the campaign!"

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)

fwiw he supported off-shore drilling during the campaign

max, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)

NOT DEFENDING THE MOVE

max, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)

The Energy Thread

^^ ilx energy experts weigh in

max, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)

and wait alfred did u want to tousle my hair? or what

yeah, guys, it's "tussle." /pedant

max probably has nice hair.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)

my theory on it re: politicking is that (even though we don't see oil from this til 2012 iirc, but there are more factors than available oil in gas prices) this drives down at-the-pump prices in an election year: that is why this & why now

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)

OTM

Jesus saved fewer people than my Savior Obama will (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:42 (fifteen years ago)

and possibly improves the jobs picture in the short-term, too.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:43 (fifteen years ago)

my theory on it re: politicking is that (even though we don't see oil from this til 2012 iirc, but there are more factors than available oil in gas prices) this drives down at-the-pump prices in an election year: that is why this & why now

― Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, April 1, 2010 10:41 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah. it polls well too--near 70% iirc

max, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:44 (fifteen years ago)

i don't think we see oil from this until 2020..? and the amount would be tiny? i.e. this is basically political theatre?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:44 (fifteen years ago)

highly recommend yall check out the energy thread i linked to for opinions from ILXors who know their shit

max, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:45 (fifteen years ago)

yeah gotcha thx

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)

i.e. this is basically political theatre?

99% of politics is basically political theatre

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)

^^^^

Mr. Que, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:47 (fifteen years ago)

Which is why Boehner and company probably approve this but have to demur in public to save face with the Palin teabaggers.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:47 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, it does suck. i'm trying to take some consolation out of the fact that the drilling, should it happen, will only take place after years of geological surveys & environmental analysis, but I do question the political effectiveness in O's getting this out there before climate & energy legislation is even under discussion. It just seems like misguided attempt to preemptively mollify the Republican opposition. Even viewing it cynically, the timing doesn't make much sense.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:49 (fifteen years ago)

99% of politics is basically political theatre

the other 1% is actual coastlines & habitats & coastal communities but who gives a fuck, right?

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:55 (fifteen years ago)

how does the timing not make sense? some easy political capital w/ a popular issue before the immigration/financial reform fights

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:55 (fifteen years ago)

Looking forward to reading in the near future that this drives down gas prices and not something else. I hope you're right John.

I do not see getting much political capital from this. It's like adding a study of tort reform to the health care bill.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:58 (fifteen years ago)

some easy political capital

zero political capitol! Republicans get to say 1) we were right all along! 2) not nearly enough! & meanwhile donors i.e. me go "why would I give you guys money, again?"

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 14:59 (fifteen years ago)

lol "capitol" sry

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:00 (fifteen years ago)

okay by your guyzes logic I'm not sure what exactly anyone could ever do to gain political capital.

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

also I wish 'political capital' didn't sound so retarded

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

iatee: the timing of this just allows the GOP to set greater demands for exploration & drilling -- already happening btw -- before energy legislation is even before congress. i'm doubtful that the popularity of this measure will translate into increased support for financial reform -- i'd be willing to hear an explanation as to how it might, but idk

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)

iatee: the timing of this just allows the GOP to set greater demands for exploration & drilling -- already happening btw -- before energy legislation is even before congress. i'm doubtful that the popularity of this measure will translate into increased support for financial reform -- i'd be willing to hear an explanation as to how it might, but idk

a. president's national approval ratings are a big factor in determining what they're capable of getting support for - esp in the house
b. this should help obama's national approval ratings (but perhaps only marginally)

I mean those are my two assumptions and you can disagree with a or disagree with b and I think there are some good reasons to disagree with either.

I'm not suggesting this is gonna get o any republican support in congress, I'm suggesting this will get him some democrats

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:10 (fifteen years ago)

okay by your guyzes logic I'm not sure what exactly anyone could ever do to gain political capital.

I don't see how you get to "you can already see that there's zero political capital gained from this" to "you guys are saying it's impossible to get political capital"

read the Republican response, gauge how other dems feel. this is a losing move on the political capital front.

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:12 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, maybe obama will use this to portray the further resistance of the GOP to cooperate or compromise -- continue to brand them as the party of 'no' as with HCR. it is a popular measure with the public and maybe that can be leveraged as the midterm elections approach. but that's a lot of speculation on my part. who knows?

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)

I don't care about the republican/left-wing democrat response to this and don't think it particularly matters

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)

lol iatee so political capital for you then means "iatee approves"

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)

actual coastlines & habitats & coastal communities but who gives a fuck, right?

J0hn is there any info about how the the new rules will impact the environment? or those communities? god knows it's enjoyable to assume other people are thoughtless dicktards but it would be great to know a little something about this.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:15 (fifteen years ago)

no, it = 'popular measure with the public'

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:15 (fifteen years ago)

i do have nice hair fwiw

max, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:15 (fifteen years ago)

I mean it's nice to pretend like we live in a world where approval ratings don't mean shit, but esp now that you're dealing w/ a lot of congresspeople who are (rightfully) scared of losing their jobs, well...

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:16 (fifteen years ago)

Why worry about Chuck Todd and the poliitcal "calculus" then? You don't have to stay, "I understand the `politics' but I think it sucks." Just say, "It sucks."

btw one of Sullivan's readers gives Obama more credit for this:

The question is: why agree to this before getting an agreement from the GOP on other things, like cap and trade? That's where you get it, Andrew, and others don't. This move, which Obama longed telegraphed, is about perception as a way to increase bargaining power with the public against the GOP's sure-fire opposition.

The lesson of health care is this: Obama knows that even if he goes to the table like Dems want, saying no to oil, no to nukes, and then compromises (what pundits want) to try and get what he wants (a cap and trade system), that he still won't get GOP support and will lose the public in the process of negotiating. it happened with health care. That's the GOPs ploy, make demands, claim the demands will get your overall support, and then walk away and talk about how ugly the process is. In private conversations GOP senators have admitted they liked the health bill but couldn't vote for it alone.

Obama is now going at it from a different angle.

Knowing he has no GOP support, he gives his conservative Dems cover by backing oil and nukes and coal and he paints the GOP in a corner, like he did after the HCR summit, as the party of No. By preemptively saying he'll drill baby drill and do nuclear power, the GOP looks obstructionist.

This is good for Dems politically on the campaign trail, and it actually increases the chances that Dems can move in unison on an energy bill by themselves. Then they'll face the prospect of getting that 60th vote on stronger grounds than had they mucked up the message with a long drawn out process, where Ben Nelson cuts deals, talks poorly about the bill etc. By preemptively saying yes to oil, yes to nukes, this cuts the process in half. It's a comprehensive bill designed by Dems that they can run on.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:19 (fifteen years ago)

stay = say

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:19 (fifteen years ago)

my guess is that the way this will be played up to those coastal states is JOBS JOBS JOBS

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:19 (fifteen years ago)

well, here's one coastal state voter who wants jobs & not at the expense of the coastline

I mean it's nice to pretend like we live in a world where approval ratings don't mean shit

it'd be nicer to live in a world where maybe they weren't considered the sole motivating force in political behavior - the cynicism of "well, it's popular" is kinda breathtaking tbh

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)

politics being cynical and populist omg lol

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:24 (fifteen years ago)

just as long as "we" don't lose seats in November right?

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

J0hn is there any info about how the the new rules will impact the environment? or those communities? god knows it's enjoyable to assume other people are thoughtless dicktards but it would be great to know a little something about this.

tracer I think history suggests that it's best to err on the side of caution when it comes to offshore drilling - besides which, more oil is not the answer to anything. the supply is limited. more drilling is a bandaid on a chest wound.

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

just as long as "we" don't lose seats in November right?

that is correct Alfred! after all, the other side is totally bad!

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

still yet to hear why this is bad policy...?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

more oil is not the answer to anything. the supply is limited. more drilling is a bandaid on a chest wound.more oil is not the answer to anything. the supply is limited. more drilling is a bandaid on a chest wound.more oil is not the answer to anything. the supply is limited. more drilling is a bandaid on a chest wound.more oil is not the answer to anything. the supply is limited. more drilling is a bandaid on a chest wound.

Mr. Que, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)

It's great policy cuz his name isn't Bush.

Twas done to balance out all the folks who will be laid off from making nuclear warheads.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)

my concern is that it will divert resources from devloping non-petro energy; otherwise, I'm not going to get too wound up about it
xxp

Religious Embolism (WmC), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)

J0hn just explained: it doesn't solve the problem and risks an environmental disaster.

Just to show you how useless partisanship is on this issue, offshore drilling is so unpopular in Florida that Jeb Bush stopped it.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)

offshore drilling is so unpopular in Florida

I'm sure some Dem cheerleader here has some polls to show you that you know nothing about how people in Florida feel

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)

Yesterday, drilling; this morning, tougher fuel efficiency rules from the EPA.

Brad C., Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

I knew if I let 'em hit me with that stick long enough they'd give me a carrot

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

'just as long as "we" don't lose seats in November right?'

"we" just passed the biggest social welfare bill since the 1960s and it took a whole lot of capital + cynicism + compromises. that same bill couldn't be passed a year from now cause "we" won't have the seats. hey look! it's stuff! that matters!

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

how's it relevant to this discussion – the mojo they got from passing health care justifies endorsing shitty policy?

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

"we" won't have the seats because of "our" cynicism

it is quite incredible how many of "us" can't connect the dots on that particular issue

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

xp The one-two on drilling and EPA rules isn't pretty, but it's interesting as orchestration of the news cycle. The EPA story seems to be getting far less coverage.

Brad C., Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)

Dems will never understand that voters reject them because they look like pussies, not because they took stands that voters might not like.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)

"we" won't have the seats because the american public has political opinions that are far from those found on ilx

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:44 (fifteen years ago)

iatee do you support removing the theory of evolution from textbooks

after all, it's just a theory

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

When all else fails, blame the American public. Winning strategy, that one.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

"we" won't have the seats because the american public has political opinions that are far from those found on ilx

you're wrong though - the reason "you" won't have the seats is because "your" party makes a habit of publicly preening its total lack of principles

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

as opposed to any other political party in history?

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

When all else fails, blame the American public. Winning strategy, that one.

I blame america for its politicians, yes

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

who said that more drilling is "the answer"?

"Drilling alone cannot come close to meeting our long-term energy needs"

"What I want to emphasize is that this announcement is part of a broader strategy that will move us from an economy that runs on fossil fuels and foreign oil to one that relies more on homegrown fuels and clean energy"

- Obama, yesterday

i'm interested in hearing exactly why it's bad. beyond "drilling = bad". i am completely open to the idea that the environmental consequences will be very bad indeed. but what are they?

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)

fwiw I wouldn't get too wound up about any actual drilling occurring any time soon. oil companies already have literally billions of square footage of offshore leases that they aren't exploiting because it just isn't economically cost-effective. to set up an offshore drilling operation requires a huge outlay of capital, and given that the amount of oil likely to be found is rather small, there isn't really a whole lot of economic incentive for oil companies to start up massive operations - it just won't make them enough money. So yeah this is all political theater - Obama scavenging for centrist brownie points - but it's long-term environmental and economic impact is likely to be negligible.

many xps

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)

I blame america for its politicians, yes

I blame politicians who can't explain what they mean in clear English and who sound like limp counterparts of their GOP opponents. And, of course, I blame people like you for voting for them. So, yeah, in a roundabout way, the American public is to blame.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)

politicians who can't explain what they mean in clear English

these have never been popular in america, iirc

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:49 (fifteen years ago)

i thought the subtext to the "DBD!!" bullshit in 08 was that everybody knew there was essentially no oil to be had off the atlantic or in the gulf. ie if it's there it's not really gettable unless oil prices are much higher than they are now, otherwise it's not worth the money to try. i haven't paid very close attention but i have not heard of any oil companies popping champagne over this.

the GOP complaint that this "doesn't go far enough" is probably down to money -- no, petro firms, we won't be giving you any more tax breaks or get the EPA off your back, but if you want to poke around for oil, fine, start the process with the impact studies and whatnot.

i don't get the timing of this thing either but any actual oil is decades away. and oil commodity traders aren't dummies either, i doubt this will have any immediate price effect; why would it? there's no oil yet. if anything the WH is trying to get out in front of the summer gas price increase. "see, we're doing something!!"

goole, Thursday, 1 April 2010 15:58 (fifteen years ago)

"i" am wondering why "we" are putting quotations around "our" pronouns because "it's" not helping "me" understand what "you" are actually trying to say

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

If this was necessary to keep Nelson and the other conservative-leaning Dems and blue-dogs in line that's sad, and I hope it will actually work and pay political dividends but I'm doubtful.

i'm interested in hearing exactly why it's bad. beyond "drilling = bad". i am completely open to the idea that the environmental consequences will be very bad indeed. but what are they?

― Tracer Hand, Thursd

Tracer,

I am sure you can google a number of articles as well as environmental group statements that go into detail on this. I have read some of them but don't have time on my lunch hour now to find them all for you.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:02 (fifteen years ago)

how many of the people clamoring "we should be drilling here at home!" know that most the oil burned in the US comes from the canada, mexico and... the US? a quarter maybe?

goole, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

btw i'm waiting for the first right winger to claim the drilling proposal is a direct personal insult to sarah palin and her family, since bristol bay is specifically kept protected.

if u all see anything let me know.

goole, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:08 (fifteen years ago)

i've been googlin and chooglin and all i kind find is a bunch of vague comments about "a wholesale assualt on our coasts" despite the fact that no rigs would be allowed within 125 miles of one

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

for anyone feeling outraged this morning & looking to keep it up

http://www.washingtonian.com/articles/people/15265.html

max, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

So I reread the reported statement after spending most of yesterday being all "boo drilling sucks" and the only substantive thing I see reported is that they're authorized to do seismic surveys. Are seismic surveys harmful to the environment?

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

what has been the envoironmental impact of the rigs currently drilling?

gelatinous rube (brownie), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

I am certain there's been a non-negligible impact from current drilling rigs; I'm asking explicitly if the investigation process also wreaks havoc on the environment and implicitly if investigating the region automatically means we will end up drilling, particularly if the statement upthread about there not being much oil/gas in that area is true.

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

IOW, I, like Tracer, would like some concrete evidence that the plan as currently stated is going to cause environmental damage before I go into a tizzy of political fury because I prefer to be effective when I complain about things.

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:19 (fifteen years ago)

kinda amazed at folks on this thread who are unfamiliar with the numerous long-term ecological disasters caused by offshore oil drilling - i.e., gigantic oil slicks washing up on beaches

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.hippopress.com/080124/FILM_There2.jpg

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:21 (fifteen years ago)

roughnecks touching your womenfolk

max, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:21 (fifteen years ago)

like this, for example, which is one of the reasons offshore drilling is banned in California

can personally attest to the fact that oil was washing up on the beaches of Santa Barbara for at least 30 years afterwards

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:21 (fifteen years ago)

I prefer to be effective when I complain about things.

this is my whole point

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:24 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, I was thinking about Santa Barbara, too.

xpost

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:24 (fifteen years ago)

Sarah Palin's complaining that there are too many survey plans and not enough drilling ones. You know those darn hopey changey liberal federal gov bureaucrats always slowing things down

curmudgeon, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

btw when I wasn't going "drilling sucks" yesterday, I was fuming over this: http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/03/31/abstinence.education/index.html?iref=allsearch

xp: kind of unsurprised that people on this thread can't comprehend simple English sentences like "I understand and agree that actual drilling is bad, but how bad are the surveys?"

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

sb already has oil rigs up and the beaches are naturally oily anyway

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

i think we should try for other sources of energy besides oil--solar, wind--that's my admittedly super simplistic view.

Mr. Que, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

i just don't think the solution is "look for oil," you know?

Mr. Que, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

that is true; i forgot to paste the other Obama quote from yesterday:

"What people need to understand is that we should not look for any other sources of energy. Offshore drilling is the strategy. End of. You want something else? Then elect somebody else. I'm out."

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

sarah palin is a psychotic who "says" whatever bill kristol types out for her facebook page. sorry to sound like a kos diarist but that's basically the story. it doesn't matter what her reasoning is, because there isn't any -- the "reason" is that something bad must be said about obama whenever he takes a step of any kind, and her punchlines must be repeated once a week at least, no matter what the context is.

xps: i think we should try for other sources of energy besides oil--solar, wind--that's my admittedly super simplistic view.

the energy outputs don't even compare, is my understanding. besides, it's not like solar and wind are impact-free; people hate those fuckin mirrors and prop towers, and they have to go somewhere.

we could do a lot more with small bore stuff like (yay!) tighter emission regs, especially on delivery and construction vehicles. plus better roads, more efficient traffic management. it's not a "green tech" holy grail issue, no matter what tom friedman says. it's a civic design problem ie pothole politics writ large.

goole, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

Environmental groups and some Democratic members of Congress say they worry that possible spills and new infrastructure on shore and off could harm plants, animals, tourism and the Norfolk naval base, the world's largest, and cost the state far more than it could ever make on drilling.

There are not only the risks of spills both chronic and catastrophic but also the industrialization of our coastal communities that would either debilitate or destroy Virginia's coastal economy," said Glen Besa, chapter director.

Both the Navy and NASA, which houses a facility on Wallops Island on the Eastern Shore, have sent letters expressing concerns about offshore drilling in recent years

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/31/AR2010033104207.html

curmudgeon, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

people hate those fuckin mirrors and prop towers, and they have to go somewhere.

mirrors versus an oil slick making a beach unihabitable.

we could do a lot more with small bore stuff like (yay!) tighter emission regs, especially on delivery and construction vehicles. plus better roads, more efficient traffic management. it's not a "green tech" holy grail issue, no matter what tom friedman says. it's a civic design problem ie pothole politics writ large.

totally agree with this

Mr. Que, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

i love those prop towers, but only when they appear in beautifully-shot movies set partly in the california desert as symbols of mans encroachment on nature and the alienation of the protagonist

max, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

sb already has oil rigs up and the beaches are naturally oily anyway

wow

your cynicism knows no bounds, eh?

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

we could do a lot more with small bore stuff like (yay!) tighter emission regs, especially on delivery and construction vehicles. plus better roads, more efficient traffic management. it's not a "green tech" holy grail issue, no matter what tom friedman says. it's a civic design problem ie pothole politics writ large.

otm

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

sb native fwiw xp

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

MIRRORS DID THIS TO ME

http://feww.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/exxonvaldez-disaster.jpg

Mr. Que, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

i'm sure i'm reading that sentence wrong but it seems like it's saying that new offshore oil infrastructure could "harm" Norfolk naval base

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

Weirdly, the article does say that.

Do some of you think they're gonna do "surveys" and then not drill?

curmudgeon, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

that's what the sentence says all right

Mr. Que, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

Environmental groups and some Democratic members of Congress say they worry that possible spills and new infrastructure on shore and off could harm plants, animals, tourism and the Norfolk naval base, the world's largest, and cost the state far more than it could ever make on drilling.

curmudgeon i have now read approx 1,000,000,000 pages of quotes like this but have yet to read an assessment by a journalist or an expert about whether these concerns are actually valid concerns. the tourism concern, for instance, as suggested earlier in the article, is probably NOT a valid concern.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

"naturally oily"

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

Have just looked at a list of oil spills over the 20th-21st century; it looks like they mostly occur when oil tankers wreck. However, there are heavy metal waste products associated with platforms?

kingkongvsgodzilla, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:39 (fifteen years ago)

Dan OTM though - the abstinence-based sex ed thing is a total outrage, and the lasting legacy of abstinence-based education is a whole lot of misery & ignorance & unwanted babies. however, I'm sure it's popular, so it must be awesome - get with the program Dan!

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

incorporating solar power into building design more frequently is probably the way to go, so that a given building draws less from the grid, i don't know the economics, or design, or regulatory issues there, but common sense says it would make more sense for big flat-roof commercial buildings that nobody looks at from above anyway. a retrofit would be pretty expensive probably.

full on "solar plants" that input into the power grid the way traditional power plants do is probably not gonna happen

goole, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

Phelps' program doesn't teach that sex before marriage is wrong, but that waiting will enable teens to eliminate the risks of sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy.

so would suicide, but my self-immolation based sex ed program continues to be ignored by the fascists in the department of education

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

"naturally oily"

yes...you would have gotten tar on your feet when you went on a walk on the beach in 1950

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

a retrofit would be pretty expensive probably.

pretty sure there are tax credits for this thing--for both homes and businesses

Mr. Que, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

awesome, we'll see how that works out then.

goole, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:45 (fifteen years ago)

yes...you would have gotten tar on your feet when you went on a walk on the beach in 1950

this is exactly the same reasoning as people who smoke and say "everything causes cancer" - "beaches are naturally oily" doesn't mean increasing the risk of a catastrophic oil spill is A-OK

however, I do understand that such a risk is 100% tolerable as long as it means somebody might vote for a Democrat at some point

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:45 (fifteen years ago)

dude

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

yay strawmen

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

this is exactly the same reasoning as people who smoke and say "everything causes cancer" - "beaches are naturally oily" doesn't mean increasing the risk of a catastrophic oil spill is A-OK

my point was that santa barbara's not as simple a case as 'catastrophic oil spill has ruined the environment forever' - although it was devastating, it's not the only reason why our beaches are oily

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

it's not the only reason why our beaches are oily

Lots of politicians lie on the sand sunbathing, that's why.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

how many of you guys own cars btw?

iatee, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

oxnard in particular is naturally oleaginous

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

i haven't owned a car since 1992

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

how many of you guys own cars btw?

I own an Explorer lol

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

i own a 9 year old car, i drive it less than once a week, but i'm lucky i live in a big city, lots of public transportation options for me.

Mr. Que, Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

on a lighter note:

The Republican National Committee sent a fundraising mail piece earlier this month with a return number that leads to a phone-sex line offering "live, one-on-one talk with a nasty girl who will do anything you want for just $2.99 per minute."

At the bottom of a piece designed to resemble a census form, a toll-free number is listed next to the national party's address.

A voter in Minnesota received the mailer and called the number intending to complain about the attempt to raise money with a form that looks like a government document.

But the Minnesotan was instead directed to a second toll-free number that greets callers as "sexy guy" before offering them the chance to talk with "real local students, housewives and working girls from all over the country."

The individual then forwarded the mail piece to the voter's congressman, a Democrat, who shared it with the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

A spokesman for the RNC declined to say how many copies of the census-style mailer were sent out.

"The number in question was a typographical error by a vendor used on this particular mailer — using 1-800 instead of 202," said RNC Communications Director Doug Heye.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 1 April 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

Leather Beltway

Religious Embolism (WmC), Thursday, 1 April 2010 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

Cap and Peg

Religious Embolism (WmC), Thursday, 1 April 2010 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

call that number & get your gears oiled amirite

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 1 April 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

http://images.politico.com/global/070410_waxman4.jpg

solar powered sex machine

Religious Embolism (WmC), Thursday, 1 April 2010 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

jesus christ

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 April 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

that guy could track a pheasant from half a mile away

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 April 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

Ultimately I agree with that "look for more oil" is not a viable long-term strategy; however, I don't have access to experts compiling and analyzing our energy consumption reports, nor do I know which alternative energy sources are currently mature enough to provide the power necessary to begin moving us off of oil dependence.

Also, wrt to the abstinence programs, I would have absolutely no problem with them if they were folded into a wider curriculum that included comprehensive teaching about STDs, neo-natal care, contraception, fertility pathology and abortion. It's all related to the same thing and information is value-neutral; just like you can't assume that kids will just not have sex if you teach them abstinence, you can't assume that kids will use protection if you teach them about it. The only thing you can really do is inform them fully, and that includes the full spectrum and they all should be taught by the same people.

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 April 2010 17:57 (fifteen years ago)

awesome

http://www.tennessean.com/article/D4/20100329/NEWS01/100329014/Victim+of+road+rage+sparked+by+Obama+

Mr. Que, Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

nor do I know which alternative energy sources are currently mature enough to provide the power necessary to begin moving us off of oil dependence.

short answer is none of them

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

So, let's assume our energy needs are being met by current drilling/oil purchases. Do we know at what rate our energy consumption is increasing/decreasing and how much/little oil we will need to support it? Also, do we have an analysis of jobs and revenue created if we do more domestic drilling and an analysis of the impact of built-in-the-2000s oil rigs upon the environment? Assuming the survey results lead to a decision to start drilling, do we have any sense of timeline as to when that would occur and how that matches up with research into alternative energy?

also wow at grieving TN cockfarmer

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

saw this dude speak at ucsb. the whole talk was premised on the idea that you have nothing to worry about re: getting enough energy, which kind of set alarm bells ringing, but i did not stick around for questions.

caek, Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

like his concern was international competitiveness and efficiency, not "is there enough stuff to set on fire yielding useful work"

caek, Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

it is a good thing that dude isn't black, as that would make his unfortunate last name even more unfortunate

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

that sounds ok to me?

lol xp

goole, Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

Just because they drilled this oil in America doesn't mean they can only sell it to Americans.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, someone should be thinking about energy in the context, i guess. what bothered me about this talk (which may well not have been representative of the complete policy) was there was no mention of any systematic effort to get off coal and oil. it was just like, this is fine for another 50 years, and then let's invent fusion.

caek, Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

hopefully in 50 years I will be entirely cybernetic and will run off of a hydrogen generator

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:44 (fifteen years ago)

The new fuel efficiency standards O announced are a step in the right direction. LOL the US hasn't had any new standards since the SEVENTIES. That's 40 years. No wonder our car industries are in a mess.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:47 (fifteen years ago)

to answer Dan (okay get ready for a long and complicated answer with a lot of caveats...)

first of all, oil (that is, crude oil that is extracted in such operations as off-shore drilling) doesn't have anything to do with energy consumption, it has to do with powering cars. Oil and energy production are mostly separate industries, separate economies, involving different technologies, etc. Energy is provided in this country primarily by a combination of natural gas, nuclear plants, hydroelectric dams, and coal, with a tiny fraction also being generated by solar and wind installations. Energy consumption varies from state-to-state, and I am primarily familiar strictly with California - which I understand is something of an anamoly (i.e., carefully managed and regulated statewide energy industry in California has resulted in energy consumption remaining flat for something like the last 30 years, due almost entirely to innovative energy efficiency programs. Great overview is provided here: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/10/the-california-experiment/7666/). California hasn't built any new power plants in years and years and the large majority of our power comes from natural gas (with a smaller percentage coming from the two operating nuke plants, dams, and renewables). By comparison, eastern seaboard states get the vast majority of their energy from coal and iirc nukes. California has demonstrated pretty clearly that if you want to minimize consumption of fossil fuels, it is quicker, easier, and more cost-efficient to reduce consumption via energy efficiency efforts than it is to attempt to bring large-scale renewable generation on-line. This is primarily because there are huge issues with tying in large-scale renewable generation to existing power-grids - where do they get developed, how does the generation flow into the grid, who gets compensated/paid for it, who finances it, and so on. It's fairly simple for someone to put solar panels on their roof and get an incentive back from the local utility for doing so, but it is much more complicated to build a giant solar array and tie that into the grid, for all kinds of technical, legal, and economic reasons. Development renewable sources of energy continues at an alarming clip, driven almost entirely by massive demand, which is driving down the cost of solar power (which still has ridiculous payback periods - like, don't expect to make your initial investment back for 10+ years, for ex.) and accelerating the pace of research. There are all kinds of fascinating things going on (fuel cells spring to mind) but it's crucial to note that no single renewable energy source is capable of replacing fossil fuels in terms of kWh per dollar, and it's by all accounts going to be a combination of them that's going to gradually replace our existing sources, barring some unforeseen technological breakthrough (which is possible but not necessarily worth betting on).

So let's not confuse drilling for oil - which will do nothing besides add a tiny fraction of available oil to the global oil supply (and let's not pretend that there's a domestic and an international markets, there is only ONE oil market) and maybe (but by no means necessarily) provide some additional bucks to oil companies and their employees - with our overall energy problem. This will do nothing besides make a marginal and temporary increase in the cost of gasoline at the pump, and won't really affect any oil companies' bottom lines. If we want to avoid using oil altogether, stop driving cars that use gasoline. Of course, if everyone switches to electric cars that just places more stress on the existing energy grid, and we're back to figuring out how to meet our electrical generation needs with stuff like with wind, solar, nukes, and fuel cells instead of the coal and natural gas we're relying on now. The downsides of coal and natural gas are obviously that they emit greenhouse gases, contributing to global warming, and also that they're finite. (Coal in particular presents additional issues due to how incredibly damaging and dirty it is but that's kinda a different tangent).

x-posts

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

(also - before anyone gets on me about this - yes in the eastern seaboard and the midwest heating oil is used in the winter to heat homes, which falls under standard energy consumption, but afaik that is not the same as crude oil that's used for gasoline. I'll defer to other more knowledgable folks on this count tho.)

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:54 (fifteen years ago)

This will do nothing besides make a marginal and temporary increase in the cost of gasoline at the pump,

urgh typing too fast, I meant DECREASE here

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 April 2010 18:56 (fifteen years ago)

why dont we focus on clean renewable whale oil technology

fat mantis (Hunt3r), Thursday, 1 April 2010 19:06 (fifteen years ago)

they are naturally unctuous!

fat mantis (Hunt3r), Thursday, 1 April 2010 19:06 (fifteen years ago)

saw this dude speak at ucsb. the whole talk was premised on the idea that you have nothing to worry about re: getting enough energy, which kind of set alarm bells ringing, but i did not stick around for questions.

you would be absolutely amazed at the amount of energy that can be saved via energy efficiency, which I'm sure is a key reason behind expressing this POV with any confidence. Not to toot my own horn too much here, but the energy efficiency industry is constantly finding ways to do more with less, and if you create the kind of economic incentives for making energy cheaper like California has, then pretty soon you have all kinds of micro-industries devoted to producing products that regulate and reduce energy consumption, which is a good deal easier and cheaper and scientifically simpler than renewable generation.

Combine this with the wide variety of energy sources available, and yeah there isn't really an energy supply problem in the US at all. There's a greenhouse gas emissions problem, and to a lesser extent there's a distribution problem given the age of the energy grid, but it is entirely within the bounds of reason to be confident about supply.

(otoh while I'm sure this dude is smart, bear in mind that the Department of Energy's main task - and the reason for its existence - is to manage country's the nuclear stockpiles and waste, not to manage the country's energy generation and consumption)

xp

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 April 2010 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

RNC census mailer includes phone-sex number

lol

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 1 April 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

upthread

drink more beer and the doctor is a heghog (gbx), Thursday, 1 April 2010 21:05 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/292767-2

The song at minute 88 is my jam.

no turkey unless it's a club sandwich (polyphonic), Friday, 2 April 2010 00:32 (fifteen years ago)

"why dont we focus on clean renewable whale oil technology"

Japan would be up for it.

earlnash, Friday, 2 April 2010 00:46 (fifteen years ago)

http://i39.tinypic.com/2i7tiiv.gif

Ted. E. Bear, P.I. (Z S), Friday, 2 April 2010 03:20 (fifteen years ago)

http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/03/sports_viewers.php

Ted. E. Bear, P.I. (Z S), Friday, 2 April 2010 03:21 (fifteen years ago)

personal experience tells a different story re: tennis but that's cool

k3vin k., Friday, 2 April 2010 03:29 (fifteen years ago)

not sure about the WWE one

Nhex, Friday, 2 April 2010 03:49 (fifteen years ago)

Not sure about any of them tbh but it's interesting to consider.

Ted. E. Bear, P.I. (Z S), Friday, 2 April 2010 03:50 (fifteen years ago)

most WWE fans are democrats, it's true.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 2 April 2010 03:52 (fifteen years ago)

ric flair; tully blanchard; dusty rhodes; hunter hearst helmsley; the iron shiek: all democrats.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 2 April 2010 03:53 (fifteen years ago)

So democrats have basketball players and WWE wrestlers, and I think the Extreme Action Sports is a good category to have locked up, but republicans have hella football players.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 2 April 2010 05:03 (fifteen years ago)

I'm picturing all these people duking it out with each other in physical combat for some reason.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 2 April 2010 05:04 (fifteen years ago)

adam, daniel is puttin' you on

Nhex, Friday, 2 April 2010 05:08 (fifteen years ago)

funny bit in Gawker today:

http://gawker.com/5507347/the-worst-column-in-the-worst-opinion-section-in-the-world-today

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Friday, 2 April 2010 06:08 (fifteen years ago)

what this really says is that EVERYONE loves the NFL, which is basically a high-volume bubble that indexes right in the middle for high/low, rep/dem

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Friday, 2 April 2010 06:23 (fifteen years ago)

i hate the nfl

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 April 2010 11:19 (fifteen years ago)

i'm having real trouble seeing what that graph has to do with the price of coffee in my ass crack.

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 11:21 (fifteen years ago)

Sports are sports, ppl.

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 11:22 (fifteen years ago)

re: the Gawker column. I rarely hear Tom Ashbrook get pissed off and frustrated with a guest, and even when he does so, he does it like a pro.

http://www.onpointradio.org/2010/03/when-opposition-crosses-the-line

He comes as close to huffing and snorting at David Winston as he has at any guest, and not for lack of letting the asshat speak his mind.

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 11:39 (fifteen years ago)

The argument from the right is: Nobody wanted this legislation. The republicans were not allowed to present their ideas.

Yeah. So.

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 11:41 (fifteen years ago)

Oh! And the most important one. All branches of government are mired in a superficial dialogue that serves neither side. This sounds reasonable, until you wear that point down to its root, which is not that government should be better, but that it should be essentially nonexistent. Which is the argument of someone who ought to be wearing foil on his head.

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 11:46 (fifteen years ago)

The argument from the right is:

argument from the right was never much more complicated than tl; dr

egregious apostrophising (schlump), Friday, 2 April 2010 12:40 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2010/04/offshore_drilling

In terms of political tactics, allowing coastal drilling may be an effective part of a strategy to push the GOP further to the right. ... It's only the world's wealthy, industrialised democracies that have been successful at preserving their natural resources. And none more so than America, the birthplace of environmentalism. The world's richest country should have the easiest time of shifting to alternative energy sources and leaving some of that carbon lying in the ground. It's very discouraging that political considerations would push it to do otherwise.

caek, Friday, 2 April 2010 13:11 (fifteen years ago)

Have any of you enviro-heads read the paper linked in that: http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.1126. Was thinking of having a bash since the technical stuff shouldn't be a problem for me, but since it's apparently attracted a bit of attention in the policy/popular press, I'd be curious what people thought of it.

caek, Friday, 2 April 2010 13:12 (fifteen years ago)

ohhh yesss im a fawnnnnncy soyentist, the technical stuff shouldnt be at all a problem for moi

max, Friday, 2 April 2010 13:17 (fifteen years ago)

zing!

caek, Friday, 2 April 2010 13:18 (fifteen years ago)

looks like the ZINGING stuff WILL BE A PROBLEM

max, Friday, 2 April 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)

haha, was your lunch money stolen by nerds or something?

what i'm saying is i could spend an hour reading that paper focussed on the details, but i have no idea whether the big picture it presents is credible, and i know there are ppl here who do.

caek, Friday, 2 April 2010 13:22 (fifteen years ago)

and what im saying is, ZUNG

max, Friday, 2 April 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

...there are people here who present the big picture as credible? I am not quite understanding where you were going with that second sentence

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Friday, 2 April 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

people here who actually know something about energy policy and climate change

caek, Friday, 2 April 2010 13:25 (fifteen years ago)

haha okay that makes more sense

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Friday, 2 April 2010 13:26 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, was trying to say i have no idea whether the big picture it presents is credible, and i know there are ppl here who do [have an idea whether it is credible].

i'm curious because it's not often an arxiv posting is all over the news like this one apparently was a couple of years ago.

caek, Friday, 2 April 2010 13:28 (fifteen years ago)

From the Orlando Sentinel:

A doctor who considers the national health-care overhaul to be bad medicine for the country posted a sign on his office door telling patients who voted for President Barack Obama to seek care "elsewhere."

"I'm not turning anybody away -- that would be unethical," Dr. Jack Cassell, 56, a Mount Dora urologist and a registered Republican opposed to the health plan, told the Orlando Sentinel on Thursday. "But if they read the sign and turn the other way, so be it."

The sign reads: "If you voted for Obama…seek urologic care elsewhere. Changes to your healthcare begin right now, not in four years."

curmudgeon, Friday, 2 April 2010 13:52 (fifteen years ago)

MoveOn emailing a petition to have Bam call off his offshore drilling. I'm sure that'll work.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 2 April 2010 13:57 (fifteen years ago)

xpost(s)

I feel like nuclear power is the elephant in the room, but it's not being discussed at all, and this time it's not the right's fault.

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 13:58 (fifteen years ago)

the DOE's doing plenty of stuff with nuclear power

http://www.ne.doe.gov/newsroom/2010PRs/nePR030810.html

http://www.ne.doe.gov/newsroom/2010PRs/nePR021610.html

Mr. Que, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:02 (fifteen years ago)

“This investment reflects President Obama's commitment to building the next generation of nuclear reactors that will create thousands of jobs and supply the clean energy to power our economy," said Secretary Chu. "It's time for America to recapture the lead in the nuclear energy industry and lay the foundation for a stronger, cleaner, and more competitive economic future.”

Mr. Que, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:04 (fifteen years ago)

But it's not being discussed. It's being sneaked in. I'm fairly pro-nuclear power, but only because it's the lesser evil. Or so it seems to me. This is an issue well worth having screaming fits on the House floor over, but there are none.

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)

Shouldn't Republicans be opposing the ENORMOUS initial investments required to build nuclear plants? Shouldn't some lefties besides Harry Shearer be talking about the dangers? Where is this discussion?

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:10 (fifteen years ago)

not sure how it's being sneaked in when there are press releases on the DOE's website about new reactors, Chu just had an Op-ed in the wsj. . .

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704231304575092130239999278.html

Mr. Que, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:10 (fifteen years ago)

the money's already been allocated for it

Mr. Que, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:11 (fifteen years ago)

As someone in the newspaper business once said to me, "If you ever do anything really terrible and never want anyone to know about it, write it up as a press release and send it to every newspaper in the country."

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:12 (fifteen years ago)

There isn't actually very much danger involved in nuclear power.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:17 (fifteen years ago)

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_HebHJGR5JjI/SKrh9boFAKI/AAAAAAAAAPM/aODZaMu-FYQ/s400/Blinky.jpg

kingkongvsgodzilla, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:20 (fifteen years ago)

xp I agree. And I guess I can see why it's being sneaked in. Half of Obama's base would have an epileptic belt-biting rug-staining shit fit if it was mentioned in a speech.

Sigh.

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:20 (fifteen years ago)

its not getting talked about the way you want because its... not that much of an issue anymore. the gop has never had a problem with corporate subsidies, and the environmental wing of the democratic party cares way less about nuclear power than they do about limiting greenhouse gases. AND its not really a top priority for the energy dept, so no one cares.

max, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:21 (fifteen years ago)

it was mentioned in a speech, you knucklehead xpost

Mr. Que, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:23 (fifteen years ago)


There isn't actually very much danger involved in nuclear power.

this is accurate, but the small dangers have potentially catastrophic consequences - cf. oil spills & offshore drilling.

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Friday, 2 April 2010 14:24 (fifteen years ago)

Here's a change of pace: The Estefans host an Obama fundraiser, Cuban-Americans pissed off.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 April 2010 14:24 (fifteen years ago)

xp to max: Yeah, I guess so. The dem column gets a mark for "jobs", the gop column gets a mark for "corporate subsidies", and nobody gets any new power from any of this for 15 years. It's the perfect boondoggle.

Well, that's one way to see it, anyway.

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:24 (fifteen years ago)

why is it a BOONDOGGLE

max, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:25 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think it is, but it appears as one to both parties enough that nobody makes any noise.

Which is what I mean. There really are things to be talked about re: nuclear power.

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:26 (fifteen years ago)

I guess I'm just bitching about how Congress never debates things that are actually debatable.

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:29 (fifteen years ago)

DOE is in charge of nuclear power, not Congress

Mr. Que, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:32 (fifteen years ago)

Congress is in charge of deciding who pays for it

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:33 (fifteen years ago)

after years of imperfect boondoggles I'm just relieved that they finally got one right

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Friday, 2 April 2010 14:33 (fifteen years ago)

i just still dont... what is worth debating, right now, at this stage in the process?

max, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:34 (fifteen years ago)

kenan's just typing letters he likes on his keyboard, they just happen to be making words

Mr. Que, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:34 (fifteen years ago)

I just knew that googling "boondoggles" would bring up a brew pub!

kingkongvsgodzilla, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:35 (fifteen years ago)

They do not yet serve hot dogs in beer.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:36 (fifteen years ago)

Mr. Que: You are crappy to me in ways I never earned.

max: You're right, and I should stop thinking out loud. At least so loudly.

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:37 (fifteen years ago)

New nuclear power plants are veeeeeeery expensive compared to almost any other alternative, including many renewable options.

Ted. E. Bear, P.I. (Z S), Friday, 2 April 2010 14:44 (fifteen years ago)

RIGHT! But once they're running, the energy they produce is virtually free.

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:45 (fifteen years ago)

Except for the expense of keeping them running safely, and then there's that thing with waste.

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 14:45 (fifteen years ago)

…except that utilities will presumably want to recoup their capital costs, right?

Ted. E. Bear, P.I. (Z S), Friday, 2 April 2010 14:59 (fifteen years ago)

The only energy plan that keeps electricity bills low is one based on coal.

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 15:00 (fifteen years ago)

(Not an endorsement of coal, as tempting as that may be.)

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)

I mention my objections to nuclear power in general on the energy thread. as I ref'd upthread, it's easier and cheaper to cut our energy consumption via energy efficiency programs than it is to build additional nuclear plants. The waste is a huge, huge issue that should not be overlooked.

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 2 April 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

like, meeting our energy demand is not a problem - its figuring out what to meet it with that is the issue, and new nuclear plants rely really heavily on gov't subsidies, are hugely expensive, require taking massive financial risks (no one wants to be financially or legally responsible for a meltdown), and contaminate the environment in a way that is potentially millions of times worse than greenhouse gases, i.e. irradiated drinking water, etc. and then there's security issues - is it really wise to be expanding the supply of fissionable material when we're trying to cut the number of weapons that use it, that type of thing...

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 2 April 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

California basically legislated nuclear plants out of existence, and I consider that a good thing. no one is able or eager to build a new one in this state, it's just not a good investment.

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 2 April 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

Yep, yep and yessiroo

Ted. E. Bear, P.I. (Z S), Friday, 2 April 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2010/04/03/world/03moscow-cnd-inline1.html

picture of one of the moscow suicide bombers, with her husband, who was killed in 09.

goole, Friday, 2 April 2010 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

I hope I'm wrong, but this looks like it could be turning into the summer of crazy.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36147629/ns/politics-more_politics/

booty claps and harp solos (leavethecapital), Friday, 2 April 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

okay fess up, which one of you was this

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Friday, 2 April 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

Morbz

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 2 April 2010 18:15 (fifteen years ago)

Sounds about right.

booty claps and harp solos (leavethecapital), Friday, 2 April 2010 18:16 (fifteen years ago)

I thought last summer was the summer of crazy. I cant take an escalation.

mayor jingleberries, Friday, 2 April 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

what a long hot summer for disasters

goole, Friday, 2 April 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

My brother found out about this guy:

http://runyanforcongress.com/

He's from my hometown and played football for my alma mater before getting drafted into the Houston Oilers. He's now running for congress after retiring from pro-football this year.

I leave you with this quote from his webpage:

Why Jon Will Win this Campaign

Jon is a fiscal conservative who believes in lower taxes and less spending, and that the answers to our problems don’t lie with the federal government, but with the American people. His core values of hard work, individual responsibility and self-reliance have shaped who he is as a person and who he will be as a Congressman.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Friday, 2 April 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)

he looks like a potato

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Friday, 2 April 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

i'm regularly reminded by news like kingfish's above of the late-period cheers episode, where frasier runs woody for election spouting only empty platitudes, and wins

♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫ (stevie), Friday, 2 April 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

It's all fun and games until somebody starts bleeding. And you know they will. You KNOW they will.

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 19:11 (fifteen years ago)

bit of follow-up on the douche who edited his tapes after visiting ACORN last year, and what the CA investigating authorities actually found out when they finally got the unedited footage

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Friday, 2 April 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

gee why isn't Breitbart running that story

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 2 April 2010 19:35 (fifteen years ago)

also isn't O'Keefe up on charges right now for trying to tap a congressman's phone

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 2 April 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

michelle bachmann claims that pelosi attempted to incite protestors:

"Remember when Speaker Pelosi walked arm in arm in a civil rights march across Independence Avenue, from the House buildings over to the Capitol. In three years I have never seen Nancy Pelosi cross the street the way that you saw in that picture. They deliberately went through that crowd, perhaps to try and incite something."

Bachmann continued: "There were so many cameras there, Sean. No one recorded any racial motivation. And everything we've heard in the last week has had a racial tinge coming out of the Democrats' mouth, and there hasn't been racial activity."

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Friday, 2 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

mmm shouting the n-word at Jon Lewis not racially motivated?

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 2 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

"just because we say racist things doesn't mean you get to call us racist"

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 2 April 2010 19:44 (fifteen years ago)

"in a civil rights march"? certainly no racial component to that comparison, no sirree!

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Friday, 2 April 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

seriously so many of these hyper-defensive rightwinger/teabagger statements are the equivalent of "that n***** played the race card!"

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 2 April 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

well that ACORN douche basically destroyed the entire organization whether it was true or not - mission accomplished

mayor jingleberries, Friday, 2 April 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY amirite

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 2 April 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

obviously pelosi should have discreetly entered by the service entrance instead of brazenly marching through a crowd of angry racists like some uppity freedom rider

ugh, wtf with these ppl

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Friday, 2 April 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)

wtf is up is that it's their MO in its entirety.

"You guys, if we don't do something about the health care system, it'll bankrupt us all before we even get to die ourselves, nevermind our children."

"GOD WHO DO YOU THINK YOU ARE? GO BACK TO KENYA!"

"Ok well, uh... tell you what. We'll write up a plan. If you want to, you can do the same."

"GO STRAIGHT TO HELL, YOU NAZI!"

"Ooooo... kayyy. Tell you what, we're going to pass this whether you like it or not."

"WE WILL START KILLING PEOPLE!"

"Mmm hmm."

"LOOK! THEY NEVER EVEN ASKED FOR OUR INPUT! SHOOT WHEN YOU SEE THE BROWNS OF THEIR SKIN!"

kenan, Friday, 2 April 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

uh oh:

http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2010/04/01/anarchists-versus-teabaggers-epic-battle-on-tax-day/

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Friday, 2 April 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)

would watch a battle between black-clad punk kids and goateed men in america baseball caps.

circa1916, Friday, 2 April 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)

michaeljacksonpopcorn.gif

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 2 April 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)

maybe they'll get together and throw some bricks through something

Kaleidoscope Funk Network (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 2 April 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)

like each other

STAY ALIVE USING EQUIPMENT (HI DERE), Friday, 2 April 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)

gah, i can't believe they call their guns "my little friend."

dorks.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Friday, 2 April 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)

i thought they were talking about their cocks

Mr. Que, Friday, 2 April 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

founding father, Tony Montana

kulinary gangsta (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 2 April 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

Oh my god, people still say "rope-smoking" to refer to marijuana!

kingkongvsgodzilla, Friday, 2 April 2010 21:20 (fifteen years ago)

i thought they were talking about their cocks

bnw, Friday, 2 April 2010 21:21 (fifteen years ago)

Oh that's nice it works both ways.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Friday, 2 April 2010 21:23 (fifteen years ago)

My brother found out about this guy:

http://runyanforcongress.com/

He's from my hometown and played football for my alma mater before getting drafted into the Houston Oilers. He's now running for congress after retiring from pro-football this year.

I leave you with this quote from his webpage:

Why Jon Will Win this Campaign

Jon is a fiscal conservative who believes in lower taxes and less spending, and that the answers to our problems don’t lie with the federal government, but with the American people. His core values of hard work, individual responsibility and self-reliance have shaped who he is as a person and who he will be as a Congressman.

― requiem for crunk (kingfish), Friday, April 2, 2010 3:04 PM (2 hours ago)

everyone who's on ilnfl knows my love for this guy but him being like this is...disappointing

k3vin k., Friday, 2 April 2010 21:31 (fifteen years ago)

Sean Hannity will be here in Atlanta

Hmm....is it against the law to fill a super-soaker with piss and spray it on people?

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 2 April 2010 21:39 (fifteen years ago)

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2010/04/obamas-17-minute-2500-word-res.html

While i don't want Obama to be brief and glib like Bush, he's gotta come up with better and more succinct answers than a 17 minute one

curmudgeon, Friday, 2 April 2010 21:41 (fifteen years ago)

cuz he's a law professor, see, and that's how they rule America.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 2 April 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

Hmm....is it against the law to fill a super-soaker with piss and spray it on people?

It's worked for Hannity so far.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 2 April 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsydVZbw5o8

no turkey unless it's a club sandwich (polyphonic), Friday, 2 April 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)

I'm confused. Is that a Cassetteboy thing?

Fetchboy, Friday, 2 April 2010 22:44 (fifteen years ago)

Dunno, someone sent it to me and I passed it along.

no turkey unless it's a club sandwich (polyphonic), Friday, 2 April 2010 23:01 (fifteen years ago)

paul ryan is incoherent and...addicted to ellipses
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/04/02/should_america_bid_farewell_to_exceptional_freedom.html
on wisconsin

kamerad, Friday, 2 April 2010 23:26 (fifteen years ago)

Christ that is some long, tedious writing! So you don't have to read it all:

abusive private insurance system & reckless, deregulated financial industry = American exceptionalism
high life expectancy/low cost systems in Europe = the path to mediocrity
the government is stealing your money
lazy people are living the high life off your blood sweat and tears
"Progressives" are responsible for the bank and car industry bailouts
inspiring words from Republican actor/GE spokesperson Ronald Reagan

Adam Bruneau, Saturday, 3 April 2010 07:24 (fifteen years ago)

From Ryan's post:

"These leaders are walking America down a new path ... creating entitlements and promising benefits that model the United States after the European Union: a welfare state society where most people pay little or no taxes but become dependent on government benefits"

may I just say re. taxes, hahaahhahahaahahahahahahahah
or else, have a look at my paycheck sometime, from an EU nation. Or check out the VAT I pay. Does this guy know any Europeans?

offshore "drilling" for (Euler), Saturday, 3 April 2010 07:45 (fifteen years ago)

really confused by ryan there. A country where there are awesome government benefits and low taxes? Does he think this is a soylent green scenario?

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 3 April 2010 09:27 (fifteen years ago)

We can't live in a country where everyone "wins". That would be like this bullshit teeball "we're not keeping score" thing I keep hearing about. There must be winners and losers, and if a just world, the losers would buy snowcones and bombpops for the winning team their parents after the game, and not even complain about it. USA!

Ted. E. Bear, P.I. (Z S), Saturday, 3 April 2010 14:33 (fifteen years ago)

level of ignorance on the part of elected officials still shocking

by another name (amateurist), Saturday, 3 April 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

like, flunked high school civics level of ignorance.

by another name (amateurist), Saturday, 3 April 2010 18:19 (fifteen years ago)

I biked past a crazy person rally today and wondered what happened to the project to get crazy people to move to new hampshire and secede.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Saturday, 3 April 2010 19:57 (fifteen years ago)

still going iirc, for some reason i checked the website like last week

drink more beer and the doctor is a heghog (gbx), Saturday, 3 April 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

http://media.theonion.com/images/articles/article/17156/KellyDominos_jpg_445x1000_upscale_q85.jpg

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 4 April 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

i do not understand that cartoon. all it says to me is that right-wing cartoonists aren't funny.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

(i know that political cartoonists aren't supposed to be hysterical. but they're not supposed to be awful and banal, either).

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

oh daniel no

goole, Sunday, 4 April 2010 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

lol wait waht?

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

if the answer here is that i'm the one without a sense of humor, i can accept that.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ward_Sutton

2nd para

goole, Sunday, 4 April 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

omg that's ward sutton?!? i love ward sutton. didn't know he was "kelly," or the joke behind it.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

haha. okay, i am an idiot.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oew-cavanaugh29mar29,0,1927201.story

goole, Sunday, 4 April 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

well, that LAT article makes me feel a little better: "(good) parody succeeds when large numbers of people don't recognize the thing as a parody."

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

It also makes a good point. People getting riled up over Census when you give more information to the pizza delivery guy.

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 4 April 2010 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

my one birther-obamafascist facebook friend just posted a link to blog that purports to have uncovered the following things in the health-care bill:

-- a PRIVATE ARMY for obama! (cleverly disguised as the National Health Service Corps)
-- and a requirement that all medical patients be implanted with a microchip!

(i refuse to link to this, but since this one woman posted it i'm assuming it's making the nutball rounds. it's useful to have one crazy facebook friend to keep track of this stuff.)

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Sunday, 4 April 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

in fairness to your friend, both those provisions are in the law.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

-- a PRIVATE ARMY for obama! (cleverly disguised as the National Health Service Corps)

I thought this was a username.

kate78, Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:01 (fifteen years ago)

someone posted this up on another board i read, taken somewhere in virginia

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/2862/photohc.jpg

~ugh~

drink more beer and the doctor is a heghog (gbx), Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah. There are plenty of jerks around who flaunt their jerkiness like it's a badge of honor.

My daughter has a neighbor whose pickup sports the bumper sticker Waterboarding Works! , along with several others of a similar nature. It's deigned to get under your skin, just to prove they know how to do it. Makes them feel powerful somehow.

Aimless, Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:39 (fifteen years ago)

I bet that truck also has nutz.

kate78, Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

that truck could use an outline of calvin -- that kid from the comic strip -- with his back turned, urinating on the back windshield, with calvin sporting an evil grin.

man, that would be so classy.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

(img deleted by poster's request)

Ted. E. Bear, P.I. (Z S), Sunday, 4 April 2010 19:58 (fifteen years ago)

HA! I mean... uh... maybe not so ha.

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

UGH!

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

plz tell me that's a photoshoped image

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

ugh, it is. I meant for that to depict the kind of calvin decal that this guy would have, not...yeah. It should be down momentarily.

Ted. E. Bear, P.I. (Z S), Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

i lol'd -- it was a good & obv joke?

jihad mane (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)

obvious in that it was obv what zs's intentions were?

jihad mane (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:09 (fifteen years ago)

I hope so, but I hate leaving any ambiguity to it.

Ted. E. Bear, P.I. (Z S), Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

oh yeah. no negative vibe intended towards zs at all.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

He was not off the mark.

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

ha, no worries, I was already feeling weird vibes anyway and I'd rather just go back to the mega-relaxed days of 10 minutes ago :)

Ted. E. Bear, P.I. (Z S), Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

Ah, the halcyon days.

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

Golden Age, Pt. II starts NOW

Ted. E. Bear, P.I. (Z S), Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

i hate z s now

max, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

http://shop.alaskamint.com/images/1259894167605-1129685225.jpeg

offshore "drilling" for (Euler), Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

Shit, you leave the internet to take one shower and miss everything...

kate78, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

Hey guys let's just forget that all happened and

http://i50.tinypic.com/2lk475l.jpg

Ted. E. Bear, P.I. (Z S), Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

I am definitely letting my subscript to The Nation lapse this summer. Being blinkered Dem alarmists, all they ever write about now is the fucking Tea Party, and I can read that shit for free here.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

we're gonna start charging to read this thread

jihad mane (J0rdan S.), Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

If the NYTimes can do it, why not actually useful news outlets?

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

what was zs' pic. someone describe it to me.

goole, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

It was a "pissing Calvin" decal, like you see on trucks, only pissing on MLK.

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

I am definitely letting my subscript to The Nation lapse this summer

I had the same thought after reading the "Attack of the Cheneys" lead article in this week's issue. Also after reading articles about Chavez throwing judges into jail that don't agree with him and noticing that the Nation never seems to incorporate that kind of information into their Chavez coverage.

Ted. E. Bear, P.I. (Z S), Sunday, 4 April 2010 20:31 (fifteen years ago)

This week I saw a pissing GOP elephant sticker on a car.

Maybe it meant Republicans are all incontinent, I don't know.

tokyo rosemary, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:10 (fifteen years ago)

-- and a requirement that all medical patients be implanted with a microchip!

― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Sunday, April 4, 2010 6:31 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

in fairness to your friend, both those provisions are in the law.

― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, April 4, 2010 6:35 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark

um what

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:34 (fifteen years ago)

hoos he was joking

k3vin k., Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:39 (fifteen years ago)

it's buried in one of the follow-up care provisions. it makes good policy sense, but publicizing it would certainly touch off a lot of outlandish far-right reactions. so the admin. is right -- it's best not to make too much of it.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:41 (fifteen years ago)

okay, yes. i was joking.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:41 (fifteen years ago)

my secret plan to turn everyone on ILX earnest and gullible is working

my full government name (WmC), Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:41 (fifteen years ago)

LOL

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

haha sorry for ruining the fun

k3vin k., Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

http://sickamorestudios.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/blackfist3.jpg

kenan, Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

that's the new HCR logo, btw. you'll see it around, just like you see the stimulus bill roadsigns

http://blog.masslive.com/breakingnews/2009/07/large_Sign.jpg

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 21:45 (fifteen years ago)

in fairness to your friend, both those provisions are in the law.

― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, April 4, 2010 6:35 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark

um what

― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, April 4, 2010 9:34 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark

in fairness to me my roommate keeps talking about this like its a real thing and i have been laughing it off so lol

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 4 April 2010 22:00 (fifteen years ago)

only republican patients will be chipped, iirc.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 4 April 2010 22:10 (fifteen years ago)

Sen. John Thune (R) will run for re-election this year in South Dakota with no Democratic opponent.

Saw this linked to on the Washington Monthly website. Isn't there a Dem ILXor in South Dakota who can run?

curmudgeon, Monday, 5 April 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)

"I never considered myself a maverick," McCain said. "I consider myself a person who serves the people of Arizona to the best of his abilities."

mayor jingleberries, Monday, 5 April 2010 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

The SD Dems considered running this guy, but decided against it at the last minute.

http://www.costaricapages.com/panama/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/redneck1.jpg

Aimless, Monday, 5 April 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)

so, it's now basically assumed on the right that the nasty stuff during the last day of the HC vote was all made up

Shocked? Yeah, Like Claude Rains Was [Hans A. von Spakovsky]

In discussing the supposed hate crime that Reps. Andre Carson, Emanuel Cleaver, and John Lewis imagined for the benefit of the press corp when they marched to the Capitol to approve Obamacare, Mark Steyn sounds surprised that Rep. John Lewis would engage in such behavior. But he should not be.

The so-called “icons” of the civil rights movement who have gone into politics have proven on many an occasion that they are willing to slime their opponents with false claims of racism for political gain, including John Lewis. When I was nominated to the FEC, Lewis claimed I had “downright contempt” for the law and the “voting rights of Americans” and that I wanted to suppress the votes of black Americans. My crime? Supporting state laws that require voter identification at the polls, a requirement that the Supreme Court has found to be perfectly constitutional. In fact, I had committed the unspeakable act of publishing a law review article on the subject! (I kid you not). Yet because I held a view of the law that the Supreme Court agreed with, Lewis basically accused me of being a racist, someone in the same class as the hateful segregationists he fought against half a century ago. My experience with him and civil rights organizations like the NAACP and the Leadership Conference for Civil Rights is that they are willing to say or do anything, no matter how false or malicious, against anyone they perceive as their political opponents.

04/05 09:50 AMShare

goole, Monday, 5 April 2010 18:01 (fifteen years ago)

bet you a million bucks the A stands for Adolph

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 5 April 2010 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

Hans A. von Spakovsky

max, Monday, 5 April 2010 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

fuck outta here with that name

jihad mane (J0rdan S.), Monday, 5 April 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

josh marshall had his number a long time ago, he was a player in the justice dept scandals under gonzales

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/003415.php

goole, Monday, 5 April 2010 18:10 (fifteen years ago)

Mark Steyn posted something similar on Friday. His point: since, he, Steyn, neither saw nor heard slurs they didn't happen.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 5 April 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

tbqf i've done some digging around on youtube and i can't find anything either -- barney frank getting called a faggot happened IN the capital, so that's well covered. but the long march through the protesters wasn't.

you find a lot of right-wing youtubers showing like 25 second clips where nobody says anything other than "kill the bill", and they're like "see, nobody said anything bad all day!!"

goole, Monday, 5 April 2010 18:16 (fifteen years ago)

On March 20th, something truly extraordinary happened. On the eve of the health care vote, a group of black Democrat Congressmen (eschewing the private tunnels they usually use to cross from their offices to the Capitol) chose to walk en masse through a crowd of protesters, confident that the knuckledragging Tea Party goons they and their media pals have reviled for a year now would respond with racial epithets.

And then, when the crowd didn't, the black Congressmen made it up anyway. Representative Andre Carson (Democrat, Indiana) insisted he heard the N-word 15 times. He's either suffering from the same condition as that Guam-flipper from Georgia, or he's a liar. At a scene packed not only with crews from the Dem poodle media but with a gazillion cellphone cameras, not one single N-word has been caught on audio. (By contrast, see my post yesterday for how easy it is to get it on tape when real epithets are flying.)

I disagree with John Lewis (Democrat, Georgia) politically but I have always respected him as a genuine civil rights warrior. And I feel slightly queasy at the thought that he would dishonor both the movement and his own part in it for the cheapest of partisan points - in the same way I would be disgusted by a Holocaust survivor painting a swastika on his own door and blaming it on his next-door neighbor over a boundary dispute.

But that's what the Democratic Party has been reduced to - faking hate crimes as pathetically as any lonely, mentally ill college student. Congressmen Carson, Lewis, Cleaver and the rest have turned themselves into the Congressional equivalent of the Duke University stripper. Except that they're not some penniless loser but a group of important, influential lifetime legislators enjoying all the privileges and perquisites of power, and in all probability acting at the behest of the Democrat leadership.

Isn't that what societies with functioning media used to call "a story"?

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 5 April 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, this is the "substance" of the right-wing counter-claim against john lewis et al -- the media is everywhere these days (and they love catching conservatives saying something nasty), everyone has a cell-phone cam, if this happened, there would be tape. since there isn't tape, it didn't happen!!

xp, is that steyn? no, he wouldn't even give credit to lewis as a "civil rights warrior" would he

goole, Monday, 5 April 2010 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

xp South Dakota Dems should run Mt. Rushmore as their candidate. Just try to smear that, Republicans!

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 5 April 2010 18:36 (fifteen years ago)

xp, is that steyn? no, he wouldn't even give credit to lewis as a "civil rights warrior" would he

Yeah, it's Steyn.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 5 April 2010 18:36 (fifteen years ago)

Bet you these people think all the previous photos of Teabaggers holding signs with racist slurs on them must be part of some huge liberal photoshop conspiracy as well!

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 5 April 2010 19:35 (fifteen years ago)

not to get too hypothetical, but what if the Dem lawmakers *had* used the tunnels instead of passing through the crowd? we'd be reading about how they couldn't face "the people" and scurried like rats through subterranean tunnels. but instead, we read about their arrogance and provocation.

and what if a racial slur had been caught on video and *had* to be acknowledged? why, it would gave been the Dem's fault anyway, for inciting the anger of the crowd with their "civil rights march," as Bachmann charmingly described it.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

"hey that guy was ACTUALLY calling Jon Lewis 'niggardly' but typical socialist Dems had to play the race card"

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

(^^^probably incorrectly assumes there's a Teabagger who knows what the word "niggardly" means)

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

oh believe me they all do

goole, Monday, 5 April 2010 19:49 (fifteen years ago)

Haha, you say that, but crazy 4nn 4lthouse has been saying exactly that, along with the idea that all the racist signs you see are liberal plants. And Scott Kaufman at Lawyers, Guns and Money has been having no end of fun with her as a result, pointing to some insanely sexist and racist comments at her blog, then joking that he actually wrote them all: http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2010/04/because-everybody-knows-theres-no-casual-racism-or-misogyny-on-the-right

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:49 (fifteen years ago)

a teacher, somewhere, got fired for using the word, it's a pretty legendary logos on the right

xp oh god althouse

goole, Monday, 5 April 2010 19:50 (fifteen years ago)

"I never considered myself a maverick," McCain said. "I consider myself a person who serves the people of Arizona to the best of his abilities."

― mayor jingleberries, Monday, April 5, 2010 5:21 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark

http://www.thesmartset.com/files/Images/Daily/Idle_Chatter/ID_IC_MEIS_MCCAIN_AP_001.jpg

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 5 April 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

lol

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

can't we just say that marching through the teabaggers was a photo-op gone strangely awry and leave it at that?

probably not, i guess.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:55 (fifteen years ago)

Chase said...

The term "teabagger" used by liberal haters is so unacceptable, I have started calling those who use it "dickwads" and "cunts" to their faces. This last Monday, while we visited a friends home, an acquaintance of our friends that I had not previously met started on a rant about teabaggers. I interrupted with "why do cunts like you always insist on using such derogatory terms for "tea partiers". She was stunned - strange for such a mouthy person - not the least because her 11 year old daughter was sitting next to her. Our friend looked at me and said "that was out of line" and I said "exactly - just my point" and then told the 11 year old exactly what "tea bagging" is. The girls mother left the room with her daughter in tow.

Sad when someone else has to educate a liberal"s kids in how evil their parents can sometimes be.
4/1/10 8:07 AM

commenter on "moderate democrat" ann althouse's blog.

goole, Monday, 5 April 2010 19:57 (fifteen years ago)

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha everything about that story is amazing

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 5 April 2010 19:59 (fifteen years ago)

"The girls mother left the room with her daughter in tow."

I like the unspoken implication that her daughter wanted to stay.

caek, Monday, 5 April 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

They have so little emotional range that they are unable to distinguish between pity and hatred.

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooah

Mr. Que, Monday, 5 April 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)

haha caek

"So wait, you're saying that the guy...? Mom, let go! I wanna understand this!"

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

that is just amazing.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

"...Then he he lowers his balls mouth for you to lovingly cradle in your mouth. Got that, you wretched little cunt-daughter?"

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

really want to hear this person's definition of 'teabagging' tbh.

xp aaaaaaaaaaand so

drink more beer and the doctor is a heghog (gbx), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

lol

caek, Monday, 5 April 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

Resurrection Monday.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

http://althouse.blogspot.com/2010/04/obama-bipasses-biracial-option-on.html

venture if u dare

goole, Monday, 5 April 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

My first thought was that he disrespected his mother and maternal grandparents, who contributed so much more to his upbringing than his father ever did. My second thought was that his experiences in society, including his rise into vast political power, had so much to do with being perceived as black (and not white). My third thought was that he wants to preserve his designation as The First Black President. He's into himself as a historical figure, and First Mixed Race President doesn't have the same cachet — and there'd be all those pesky arguments about whether he was the first. Out on the internet, I'm seeing claims that various former Presidents — Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Warren Harding, Calvin Coolidge — had a mixed racial ancestry. I can see not wanting to get bogged down in that.

wtf is wrong with this woman

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_t6ikLJ4YVos/RygyVg07NTI/AAAAAAAAA2o/VrY4jNY2_1o/s400/althouse-drinking.jpg

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

i will not dare to venture

drink more beer and the doctor is a heghog (gbx), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

i already hate that woman anyway

Mr. Que, Monday, 5 April 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

Peter V. Bella said...

I did not check any boxes. I wrote in American Born.
4/3/10 9:53 AM

kind of lolling at everyone who did this, it reminds me of me when I was 12

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

haha sadly there is a whole list of crazy bs althouse has argued in a "gee, i'm just askin'" way, and just as sadly i know a lot of it

goole, Monday, 5 April 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

Frankly, can you imagine if he'd picked bi-racial?!

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

meanwhile: http://www.ep.tc/obamunism.html

200 examples of anti-obama signs & graphics from the last two years.

I'm wondering if we should have a poll.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

no

Mr. Que, Monday, 5 April 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

some of those are awesome, like the "You're Next" one

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:46 (fifteen years ago)

http://images4.cafepress.com/product/358235814v2_480x480_Front.jpg

lol rounding error

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)

I like DON'T COMMUNIZE ME BRO!!!

still driving steen, banning deez, gettin my dick xhuxked (Curt1s Stephens), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:51 (fifteen years ago)

lol yeah that is good

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

holy shit at "BITCH, BETTA HAVE MY TAXES"

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 5 April 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

they really shoulda went w/ the county by county map

iatee, Monday, 5 April 2010 20:54 (fifteen years ago)

i want a t-shirt that says CALVIN COOLIDGE WAS A BLACK MAN

kulinary gangsta (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:05 (fifteen years ago)

isn't that a JSBX song

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)

I like that now there is a black president the right seems to have become very keen on 'no such thing as race' arguments.

grobravara hollaglob (dowd), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

god where is the "wm. henry harrison, the realest nigga alive" thread??

kulinary gangsta (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmLVtU6fTPs&playnext_from=TL&videos=D5BkvbPVRdA&feature=sub

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 5 April 2010 21:30 (fifteen years ago)

I have started calling those who use (the term "teabaggers") "dickwads" and "cunts" to their faces.

ME TOO

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 5 April 2010 21:32 (fifteen years ago)

I don't get it, is this guy British?

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:33 (fifteen years ago)

This last Monday, while we visited a friends home, an acquaintance of our friends that I had not previously met started on a rant about teabaggers. I interrupted with "why do cunts like you always insist on using such derogatory terms for "tea partiers". She was stunned - strange for such a mouthy person - not the least because her 11 year old daughter was sitting next to her. Our friend looked at me and said "that was out of line" and I said "exactly - just my point" and then told the 11 year old exactly what "tea bagging" is. The girls mother left the room with her daughter in tow

i did almost the exact same thing on saturday. except i also shot paintballs from a toy rifle until the mother and daughter ran crying from the house.

then i had a cream soda.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 5 April 2010 21:34 (fifteen years ago)

he should've just teabagged her amirite

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

even pretending that "teabagging" and "cunt" are in the same league of offensiveness is just... breathtaking

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

eh the bigger problem is that Teabaggers ACTUALLY CALLED THEMSELVES TEABAGGERS for a good long while there, so its not like its just some made-up insult.

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

the bigger problem is that this guy's an asshole

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:58 (fifteen years ago)

not a problem for him obviously

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)

that whole story is essentially someone forgetting/not realizing that real life isn't a messageboard

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 5 April 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)

i think that story is made-up

max, Monday, 5 April 2010 23:11 (fifteen years ago)

that whole story is essentially someone forgetting/not realizing that real life isn't a messageboard

cf all radical politics in the ~digital age~

drink more beer and the doctor is a heghog (gbx), Monday, 5 April 2010 23:34 (fifteen years ago)

Oh wow that story about the teabagger cursing in front of an 11-year-old is damn damn funny.

Almost too funny.

Another part of the vast liberal conspiracy?

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 02:46 (fifteen years ago)

i like this obvious point about all the tea-party horseshit, that these people are mostly just the same talk-radio listeners and angry-white-asshole demographic that have been a persistent part of the political scene for decades. they're the same ones who had 10,000 bill clinton conspiracy theories, and who spent most of the bush administration obsessing about muslims and mexicans. just because they got a new brand name doesn't make them new.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 03:00 (fifteen years ago)

Been reading a lot about these guys.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 03:01 (fifteen years ago)

smedley butler is a great name. if i started a tea party group i'd call it the smedley butler bridgade.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 03:41 (fifteen years ago)

or an anti-tea-party group, i suppose i mean.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 03:43 (fifteen years ago)

Wow, cool. I remember reading briefly about that FDR plot in school!

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 03:52 (fifteen years ago)

the wikileaks "collateral murder" video is being discussed everywhere. i don't even know what to say.

goole, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i was gonna post something about it yesterday, but had only gotten through about 6 min

drink more beer and the doctor is a heghog (gbx), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

discussed like

Worst case scenario this is a few innocent being accidentally killed in the fog of war.

But the video doesn't even appear to be worst case scenario. It appears, in fact, that the video shows armed insurgents engaging or about to engage US troops. The Reuters camera men had embedded themselves with the insurgents. This makes them enemy combatants themselves and should have been shot.

?

the big pink suede panda bear hurts (ledge), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

yeah the whole response industry to this is so tiring and overdetermined, ugh...

MASSACRE vs FUCK YEAH, rinse, repeat

goole, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

goole otm

there's hardly any point in reading about this stuff it feels like

it's gonna happen, some people feel mad about it, maybe if we get lucky they hang some guy out to dry who isn't even .0000000001 of the overall problem in why shit like this keeps goin down

nobodygivesashit.gif

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 17:15 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i mean people get all wrapped up in the "rules of engagement" and who did or didn't follow them, but the real reason this stuff happens is ... having a huge, heavily armed military force conducting operations in a foreign country. as long as that's the case, we're going to kill a lot of people, no matter what the rules say.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

yep

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)

having a huge, heavily armed military force conducting operations in a foreign country is not going to stop though (presumably we're not opposed to the _principle_ of having armed forces that operate outside our own borders). so yeah, horror fatigue, but it seems worthy of the front pages its getting.

caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 17:29 (fifteen years ago)

(presumably we're not opposed to the _principle_ of having armed forces that operate outside our own borders).

depends on what they're doing there

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

Opening Starbucks.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

xp, exactly.

caek, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

Making sure things are secure for new sweatshops for all-American multinationals.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

Just a lonely Weekly Standard columnist thinkin baout things:

Here's some helpful analysis of President Obama's first pitch today. It specifically critiques last year's pitch, but since he's shown no signs of improvement in the last year, it's equally relevant today.

After having seen the president try to throw a baseball, I must confess to having been mildly surprised to see some degree of coordination on display in his shooting a basketball. Still, I can’t resist asking a few questions about the president’s “shooting competition” versus Clark Kellogg:

1. Why wear shorts on Air Force One in Europe—and regularly not wear ties at events of a somewhat formal nature—and then wear a tie to play hoops?

2. Has President Obama ever played basketball on a team in a meaningful way? Sports Illustrated describes his having been on the “jayvee as a sophomore” at his high school in Hawaii, having made “second varsity” as a junior—SI explains that the “school fielded multiple teams in some sports”—and having finally made the varsity during a season spent “largely on the bench” as one of the “pine-riders.” (And this is Hawaii—hardly a rival of Indiana or North Carolina when it comes to hoops hotbeds.)

3. As a lefty, why release your jump-shot from the right side of your head?

4. Can the president dribble with his right hand at all (and I’m not speaking figuratively)?

5. Why was it that Clark Kellogg, whose shots were repeatedly flicking the bottom of the net as he built up a P-O-T-U (H-O-R-S) lead—much of it off-camera—barely able to draw iron after that? (This is not a tough question.) Relatedly, has President Obama recently played in a basketball game, or even a shoot-around, in which someone actually tried to beat him? I would love to see such a game take place.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

oh please let me play Obama, I would do my best to BURY him (note: I am terrible)

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

What is this alternate incarnation of HORSE spelling?

how is abbott formed (Abbott), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 18:51 (fifteen years ago)

Hah wow that is awesome. I'm going to write a blog critiquing how he eats his food. Clearly from the disappointing angle that he holds his spoon you can tell his presidential administration is going to be a failure.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 18:51 (fifteen years ago)

Can we merge this with the GOP thread? I'm as confused as that Weekly Standard guy criticizing Obama's pitching.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 18:54 (fifteen years ago)

His basketball form ain't bad but his baseball form looks like he's never thrown a baseball. It's not just right-wingers saying this. I heard it on ESPN this morning and from others.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 18:55 (fifteen years ago)

What is this alternate incarnation of HORSE spelling?

President of the United States

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 18:56 (fifteen years ago)

"i would love to see someone beat President Obama at HORSE, because it would prove he is a socialist."

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

Here's some helpful analysis of President Obama's first pitch today. It specifically critiques last year's pitch, but since he's shown no signs of improvement in the last year, it's equally relevant today.

Well, I guess he won't make the starting rotation again, then.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

little wikileaks video talk here btw - 2010 in Iraq

a midsummer night's cream (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2006/03/05/060306bush_narrowweb__300x393,2.jpg

This is how real Americans do it.

offshore "drilling" for (Euler), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:11 (fifteen years ago)

Get ready for the roffles:

Obama, Rahm, Biden, Gibbs and probably some of the rest of the administration suffer from a severe fake macho complex. I think I've just invented a term here, so let me explain. Fake macho is the act of engaging in stereotypical male activities with great fanfare and publicity.

Bush, by all accounts, is a fitness enthusiast. Yet, I don't remember hearing as much about his activities as I do about Obama. Bush quietly woke up early every morning and hopped on the stationary bike. . . .Thus, his first pitch entailed walking to the mound, throwing the pitch and walking away. It was simple and serious; consistent with activity that is done often and sincerely. It did not come across as purely for show.

By contrast, I know every team that Obama follows in all of his favorite sports. I can tell you how his final four brackets looked the past two years. I know that he enjoys golfing much more than Bush and plays basketball on a regular basis with other guys (and only guys!) within the administration and Congress. Thus, he trots out there for his first pitch and engages in silly theatrics. He even brought his own props! (Oh and look, it is that same Chicago White Sox gag he did last time.) Then Obama throws a horrible pitch, laughs and almost makes a little-girl-like "oops" gesture with his hand over mouth.

All of this is accentuated by his staff. I know that Gibbs is from Auburn and was disappointed last year when they didn't make to the tournament and tweeted about his love for Auburn the day Alabama visited the White House. I know that Rahm Emanuel does stereotypical things like yell at people while naked in Congressional gym showers, sends dead fish to political enemies, and spent an evening after an election victory on top of a table shouting a list of people (mostly men) he was going "f***." Don't forget my favorite, what is the best way to resolve a manly dispute? Why, over a beer in the Rose Garden!

Certainly some of these are natural things that men enjoy; but endlessly promoting them in a "hey, look I'm a real man" manner is downright creepy. This is fake macho.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:13 (fifteen years ago)

Facho?

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.odt.co.nz/files/story/2008/08/president_bush_talks_with_misty_may_treanor_left_a_489e361c84.JPG

offshore "drilling" for (Euler), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:15 (fifteen years ago)

Quien es mas facho?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:15 (fifteen years ago)

I know that Rahm Emanuel does stereotypical things like yell at people while naked in Congressional gym showers

er exactly which stereotype is this fulfilling

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:15 (fifteen years ago)

"those sports-obsessed macho guys, always yelling at people while naked in Congressional gym showers"

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

they're desperate

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

Man I thought that Althouse piece on Obama's census form was going to be the worst shit I read all week. I guess it's going to be a long week.

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

kudos on making Rahm Emmanuel sound like a roided-up rapist obsessed with "The Godfather", I guess

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:19 (fifteen years ago)

you should find the bit where althouse speculates/accuses that obama is a drunk

goole, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

Obama throws a horrible pitch, laughs and almost makes a little-girl-like "oops" gesture with his hand over mouth.

Someone else has "macho issues."

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

kudos on making Rahm Emmanuel sound like a roided-up rapist obsessed with "The Godfather", I guess

http://www.filmofilia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Bad_Lieutenant_Nicolas_Cage.jpg

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

Considering that there is a great deal of research showing that it is a positive health benefit for a man to drink 1 or 2 beers a day, I would think that a 6 foot 1 1/2 inch man like Obama could easily drink 3 or 4 beers a day without there being an actual negative effect of concern to a doctor.

How much is Obama drinking?

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

wow. can't believe it. good for him!

http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/04/coburn-to-town-hall-dont-believe-everything-you-hear-on-fox-news.php?ref=fpblg

"Don't just watch Fox News or CNN, watch them both," Coburn said. He said he read both The Washington Post and The New York Times -- plus The Wall Street Journal -- and urged his audience to do likewise. "Listen to the other side, because what it does, it makes you a better person."

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

Yet, I don't remember hearing as much about his activities as I do about Obama.

http://www.bartcop.com/bush-codpiece-808.jpg

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

you should find the bit where althouse speculates/accuses that obama is a drunk

wait waht?

which was the tabloid that kept running "urgent headlines!" that GW bush -- a real man's man, btw -- was still a drunk, and maybe even a druggie.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, just look at him: A REAL MAN'S MAN.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

http://srv14.movie-list.net/sexmaniac/img/package.jpg

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:28 (fifteen years ago)

http://static.open.salon.com/files/bush-clearing-brush.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJvRUL81ZU8

I mean, who do these Corner fucks think they're fooling?

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:30 (fifteen years ago)

each other.

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

Bad Rahmance

ô_o (Nicole), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

http://althouse.blogspot.com/2010/03/how-many-beers-day-would-obama-need-to.html

in fairness, she did correct herself after a reread of the source text. but not before lashing out at some other bloggers who made fun of her for it. delightful woman.

goole, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

I heartily endorse my President(and in fact, ALL my elected officials) drinking beer. A lot, if need be. Keep Joe Biden liquored up if it keeps him happy and productive thru-out his term.

also, re: ball, Obama's brother-in-law is coach at Oregon State, who aren't too shabby(nowhere as bad as Oregon, I'm led to believe).

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

Biden doesn't drink.

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:35 (fifteen years ago)

Yes, but if he did, kingfish would love him.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:35 (fifteen years ago)

Oh shit, you're right, I'd completely forgotten that.

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, who do these Corner fucks think they're fooling?

http://culturekitchen.com/files/rice.cheney.bush.rumsfeld.jpg

Remember this? Bush was such a nice guy he made the ailing, out of shape veep and Rumsfeld walk through the Texas summer heat so that they could Project Strength.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

lol they are playing Reservoir Dogs

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

Easy to forget when Biden acts the part of 'favourite alky uncle' in public. xpost

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

God, is Cheney's coat buttoned?

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

If he opened it you'd see the hole where his heart's supposed to be.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:39 (fifteen years ago)

The Corner whining is bringing me back to this thread:

marketing of masculinity

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

This is like a free ice cream for democrats today. Are they all "This all you got?" to Repubs? This is scraping-the-bottom-of-the-barrel. LOL

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

unfortunately 75% of humanity lives on the bottom of the barrel

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

LOL

Does paying a little over a fourth of the nation's GDP into federal and state treasuries make us all one-fourth slaves? This is about as logical as saying the girl who let her high-school boyfriend get to "first base" last night is now one-fourth pregnant--you know, conceptually.

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/04/jonah-goldberg-quarter-slave.html

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

Biden doesn't drink.

― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Tuesday, April 6, 2010 2:35 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

It's really interesting to me how pop culture portrays Biden as a party-happy boozehound. Is it just that he's a big winking schmoozer and makes the more-than-occasional slip of the tongue?

jam master (jaymc), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:57 (fifteen years ago)

that's probably 93% of it

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 19:58 (fifteen years ago)

I found out he didn't drink during last summer's Beergate.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

It's just kind of funny how stuff like this resonates, despite its distance from the truth:
http://www.theonion.com/articles/shirtless-biden-washes-trans-am-in-white-house-dri,2718/

jam master (jaymc), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

shameful confession: i like joe biden. and i feel for him, because of past tragedy in his family.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

THAT BIDEN PICTURE IS "PHOTO-SHOPPED"

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

. . . imho

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

the headline resonates, sure, but the article lays it on a little thick

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

very tempted to refer to him as Bitchtits Biden because of that not-at-all-photoshopped picture

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

it isn't photoshopped? poor joe biden. his head wobbles on his shoulders like a bobble-head doll's.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

nope, not photoshopped at all.

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

really the best part of the pic is the loafers

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)

i can't believe president obama let biden wash his car on the white house's driveway.

thank goodness we have an election soon, when the adults will return to power.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)

and then in 2012, it's going to be so sweet.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:09 (fifteen years ago)

Pres. Palin.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:09 (fifteen years ago)

Michael Palin wasn't born in the US, though.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:09 (fifteen years ago)

should i transcribe the transcription of chris matthews' interview of g. gordon liddy after 'mission accomplished' where liddy talks about how the fighter suit and harnessed accentuated the size of bush's penis

jihad mane (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

from greenwald's book

or matthews interview w ann coulter where he says that bush looks "very much like a high flying jet star"

or the joe klein says that it was the coolest presidential moment since bill pullman in "independence day"

jihad mane (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

lol, yes plz (re: g gordan's comments).

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

that guy is AN AMERICAN HERO

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

Michael Palin wasn't born in the US, though.

michael palin doesn't "send little starbursts through the screen and ricocheting around my living room." former one-half-term gov. sarah palin does, tho. and she is 100% AMERICAN TOUGH.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

Haven't read this blog before:

http://blogometer.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/04/46_the_rightroo.php

Interest summary of what's floating about today in blogoland

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/04/jonah-goldberg-quarter-slave.html

dude eviscerates poor jonah

bnw, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

interesting, rather

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

here, daniel

MATTHEWS: What do you make of this broadside against the USS Abraham Lincoln and its chief visitor last week?

LIDDY: Well, I- in the first place, I think it's envy. I mean, after all, Al Gore had to go get some woman to tell him how to be a man. And here comes George Bush. You know, he's in his flight suit, he's striding across the deck, and he's wearing his parachute harness, you know— and I've worn those because I parachute— and it makes the best of his manly characteristic. You go run those— run that stuff again of him walking across there with the parachute. He has just won every woman's vote in the United States of America. You know, all those women who say size doesn't count— they're all liars. Check that out. I hope the Democrat keep ratting on him and all of this stuff so they keep showing that tape

MATTHEWS: You know, it's funny. I shouldn't talk about ratings. I don't always pay attention to them, but last night was a riot because at the very time Henry Waxman was on— and I do respect him on legislative issues- he was on blasting away, and these pictures were showing last night, and everybody's tuning in to see these pictures again.

jihad mane (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

You're freaking kidding me, right? Narrowing the circumstances under which we can use nuclear weapons, while Vladimir Putin is in Venezuela making nice with Hugo Chavez? This is our response? Screw Jimmy Carter, it's George McGovern time, now.

We can't get this weakling out of the WH fast enough.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

It's so awesome, that evisceration.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

dear G. Gordon Liddy: what the hell

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

lol i remember g gordon's comments!

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)

a parachute harness does make the best of his manly characteristic

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)

In what universe is "they're just mad because women are falling for his enormous dick" illuminating political commentary?

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)

GWB just won the vote OF EVERY WOMAN IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

you know, women say size doesn't count — they're all liars.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)

g gordan liddy: as loony today as he was 30 years ago.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

He's perfectly sane and has honed his act to perfectin.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

he has me fooled!

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

the best part of the quote is that liddy imitates that he routinely parachutes

jihad mane (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

er, intimates

jihad mane (J0rdan S.), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

Imitates would be funnier. "I parachute, Chris. Check it out, like this: WHOOOOOOOOOOOOSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!"

Tarfumes The Escape Goat, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

GWB: man among men. BHO: a sniveling, wimpy, sissy-in-chief.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)

thecontrastcouldn'tbeclearer

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)

I like how he covers up how he wants to watch W's package strut across the deck by claiming every woman in America wants to see it.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

He has just won every woman's vote in the United States of America. You know, all those women who say size doesn't count— they're all liars. Check that out. I mean, how big do you think it is, really? It's probably fucking huge. He probably could have invaded Iraq with just his codpiece. That's the kind of man he is.

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

shock and awe

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

"I bet it tastes like Skittles. Do you think it tastes like Skittles, Chris? Maybe smoked bacon, that's more manly. Yeah, hot rugged smoked bacon. That's what... the ladies! The ladies want."

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah but he's a fighter not a lover.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:50 (fifteen years ago)

To expand on Daniel's link upthread:

On C-SPAN this morning, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) described his close friendship with President Obama despite their extreme ideological differences.

Said Coburn: "I try to write him about every week or two. Write him a note, encourage him. No one has a tougher job than he does... We came into the Senate together, and I just have a lot of admiration for him. I'm 180 degrees from him on policy on most issues. But I think he's a wonderful man."

Coburn notes his relationship with Obama is "by far" much closer than he has with former President George W. Bush.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

Coburn is kind of a fascinating person

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:00 (fifteen years ago)

he also recently defended pelosi and took aim at FOX news. unexpected, and welcome.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:00 (fifteen years ago)

funny that arguing in favor of trying to act from a basis of consensus reality is some kind of radical act for these guys

goole, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)

not ha ha funny

goole, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)

http://wingsoveriraq.blogspot.com/2010/04/why-coin-for-aviators-is-so-important.html

spencer ackerman linked to this. interesting post, argues that the apache attack on the reuters journalists & companions, whatever else it might be, is a military failure.

interestingly it links to an even LONGER version of the video -- there's a third segment where they shoot missiles into a building?? dunno if i can stomach that tbh

goole, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:35 (fifteen years ago)

love coburn's contention that CNN is somehow the left-wing equivalent of Fox!!?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:40 (fifteen years ago)

"i'm not an alcoholic - some nights it's a fifth of Jim Beam, but other nights it's just a sixer of Falstaff"

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

it's kind of like MSNBC doesn't even exist

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

eh well consider his audience tracer. we're in "not fox = pravda" territory here

goole, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

didn't coburn offer one of the more offensive amendments in the Vote-O-Rama that took place in the senate when it voted on "fixes" to HCR?

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

yup! the viagra for sex offenders one. all in the game man.

goole, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

WHY DO DEMOCRATS WANT TO ALLOW SEX OFFENDERS TO GET VIAGRA?

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

what kind of monsters are these leftists?

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

leftists like John King!

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:58 (fifteen years ago)

like Wolf Blitzer!

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)

Obligatory viagra and abortions!

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)

guys i heard CNN got a new correspondent, his name is Strafe Hardkill

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 22:00 (fifteen years ago)

Obligatory Abortions!

good name for a punk band

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 22:03 (fifteen years ago)

Talk about 'no future'...

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 22:19 (fifteen years ago)

Erickson: "Signaling to our enemies that we will not punch back as hard as we can will just embolden them. Even if the President intended this, he should not advertise it to the world. It is one thing to have a wimp in office. It is another thing to admit it. This policy is the coming home of the sixties radical left agenda of pacification in the face of our enemies and capitulation of a strong America. Bill Ayers is a happy man today. His man in the White House is doing for him what he never could himself. How many Americans will get killed because of this administration's incompetence or intentional capitulation of our national security?"

Still somewhat amazed that CNN gave this moron a job.

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)

How many Americans will get killed because of this administration's incompetence or intentional capitulation of our national security?

a: zip

drink more beer and the doctor is a heghog (gbx), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 22:22 (fifteen years ago)

How many Americans will get killed because of this administration's incompetence or intentional capitulation of our national security?"

Yet again, Erickson prefers to lash out at the POTUS (from another party, boo hoo) than examine the rationale behind Obama's change in policy. In seeking a safer world that nonetheless contains nukes, he's basically saying to Iran and N Korea that vying for nuclear powers status has actually just singled them out for quicker and more comprehensive destruction. unlike their non-nuclear neighbors who merely face conventional annihilation. Erickson can wonder at how this would actually play out and he can debate the relative danger of a nuclear first strike compared to biological or chemical ones, but this is cheap rhetoric.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 22:28 (fifteen years ago)

is that really one of the more offensive amendments? it's one of the dumber ones but it doesn't offend me.

akm, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 22:35 (fifteen years ago)

offensive only because it's craven political move.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 22:37 (fifteen years ago)

could be worse, i suppose: WHY DO DEMOCRATS WANT NAZIS TO HAVE FREE COCAINE?

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 22:38 (fifteen years ago)

It's about as subtle as the rest of the "the Administration is full of panty-waists" bs they're peddling to their knuckle-dragging supporters.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 22:40 (fifteen years ago)

did you realize that, under obamacare, all hospice care will be cut in 2012?

not only does the administration want you to die younger, they want you to die a slow and painful death, as well.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 6 April 2010 22:46 (fifteen years ago)

How many Americans will get killed because of this administration's incompetence or intentional capitulation of our national security?"

It's so ironic that this is being asked the same day that Iraq Collateral Murder video is out.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 22:53 (fifteen years ago)

intentional capitulation of our national security

Is it just me or does this look like dodgy syntax to anyone else? One capitulates to an enemy I would have thought, i.e. the verb is intransitive.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 22:58 (fifteen years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/mgQd0.jpg

Jesus, Flight 93, Abortion, and Suspect Capitalization

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 23:30 (fifteen years ago)

And an airplane constructed from bananas, apparently

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 23:33 (fifteen years ago)

Save God's Unborn Hero's . . . I can't even parse that.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Tuesday, 6 April 2010 23:35 (fifteen years ago)

Save God's UnBorn Hero's

harbl, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 23:36 (fifteen years ago)

lol

harbl, Tuesday, 6 April 2010 23:36 (fifteen years ago)

Why can't the aborted give their lives to save other lives as well? Wouldn't that also make them heroes by this definition?

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 00:26 (fifteen years ago)

The chatter begins.

http://academic.regis.edu/jriley/images/Supreme_Court_US_2009.jpg

God, Alito looks like such a douche in the photo. Everyone else is smilin'.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

alito just lookin like he doesnt know the picture has been taken already

i'm 84 cars seesawing with demi moore (m bison), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:25 (fifteen years ago)

Also: Scalia becomes the senior associate justice upon the retirement of Stevens.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)

still kind of boggles my mind that Kagan is at the top of the list

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)

why?

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)

mostly because I feel pretty strongly (and I know there is historical precedent that contradicts me) that you should have served as a judge before being nominated to the Supreme Court

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:30 (fifteen years ago)

(also partially because it sort of boggles my mind that my wife knows the Solicitor General and possibly the next member of the Supreme Court)

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:31 (fifteen years ago)

mostly because I feel pretty strongly (and I know there is historical precedent that contradicts me) that you should have served as a judge before being nominated to the Supreme Court

Oh I dunno – I think we need more former politicians on this iteration of the Court (a Hugo Black would be fab).

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:35 (fifteen years ago)

I get that and it makes sense, but kind of like how I wouldn't put a non-MD on a hypothetical high court of doctors, I wouldn't put a non-judge on a high court of judges. That's just me, though.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 13:38 (fifteen years ago)


(also partially because it sort of boggles my mind that my wife knows the Solicitor General and possibly the next member of the Supreme Court)

btw I am campaigning heavily for the admin to bypass the middleman here and just appt mrs. hi dere to the bench - as is widely known, when the twink will ferrell speaks the white house listens, so prepare for your life to change

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 14:26 (fifteen years ago)

oh man, I am imagining the confirmation hearings and loooooooooooooooool

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 14:29 (fifteen years ago)

HI DERE/MRS HI DERE '12

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 14:30 (fifteen years ago)

"Is it true that you and your husband recently attended something called 'Bat Days'?"

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 14:37 (fifteen years ago)

Virginia's new Republican governor is bringing back Confederate History Month

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/06/AR2010040604416.html?hpid=moreheadlines

The seven-paragraph declaration calls for Virginians to "understand the sacrifices of the Confederate leaders, soldiers and citizens during the period of the Civil War."

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

I'm kind of all for a warts-and-all in-depth look at the Confederacy. I suspect that this is not that look.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)

It's for tourism. "Virginia is for haters."

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:02 (fifteen years ago)

I get that and it makes sense, but kind of like how I wouldn't put a non-MD on a hypothetical high court of doctors, I wouldn't put a non-judge on a high court of judges.

this is more like thinking that you should only run for congress if you haven't been a state/local politician. yeah there are benefits to 'political experience' but there are also obv drawbacks to putting career politicians in places of power. likewise, there are serious drawbacks to limiting the sc to people who think in a very institutionalized manner.

imo any semi-literate person could learn how to be a sc justice on the job + would do a better job than half of the people currently there.

iatee, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)

"if you have* been a"

iatee, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

There are obvious drawbacks to putting ANYONE in a position of power; the interesting questions come out of how you weigh those drawbacks. I think that, unless your goal is undermining/overhauling the institution, picking someone who understands and has worked within the framework they will be running/overseeing/representing etc. I am not convinced that the Supreme Court as an institution needs to be undermined/overhauled and, as such, am much more in favor of putting actual judges on it.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:18 (fifteen years ago)

there's a big difference between 'undermined' and 'overhauled'.

I am very much behind it being overhauled.

iatee, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

you realize that "/" notation does not imply any sort of equivalence between the options, right

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)

like, these are things that one could do, not these things are indistinguishable from each other and totally interchangeable

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)

all I was saying is that they're not on the same magnitude

iatee, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:27 (fifteen years ago)

and yes, I know, nothing you said suggested that they were.

iatee, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

i'd make the case that being a lower court judge is no indicator at all of what it is to be on the SC. ever other judge has to rule in light of current SC precedent. the SC rules on things where there is no precedent at all, that's the point. every judge has to (or is supposed to) make their judgments "within the law", the SC is the one place we have where they don't have to, mostly because they can't -- there's no law there until the SC says there is, in some cases. the SC rules on things where the questions ARE basically about beliefs, principles, and assumptions about what is true in the world, or best for everyone morally -- that is, making political decisions. we might as well look at that clearly rather than hiding behind this roberts-ite "just calling balls and strikes" bullshit

something like roe vs wade is a perfect example. is there a constitutional guarantee to have an abortion? there wasn't until the decision was made, and the decision was entirely political

goole, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

iatee, I am curious as to why you think the SC should be overhauled? It's the least democratic of all branches of US govmt (and usuall its stability is lauded) and previous attempts to mess with it (I'm primarily thinking of FDR, of course) have not gone down well w/the public. I's like to see different justices sitting but that's not an overhaul, it's time and luck in presidential elections.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:31 (fifteen years ago)

Not entirely accurate, right? Roe v Wade had to be justified in terms of expansions or reconsiderations of things hinted at in a string of previous rulings, not all directly related to reproductive rights, which developed the jurisprudence of a "right to privacy." Not to say SCOTUS can't and hasn't made things up by fiat but it's typically a kind of protracted fiat where bodies of law get worked out long-term. To say that the decision was "entirely political" is baffling to me - - I mean it was clearly very UNpopular politically and IIRC weren't some justices brought on board partly out of kind of pragmatic, rational-basis "this will save lives" logic?

Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:32 (fifteen years ago)

that's an xpost to goole

Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:33 (fifteen years ago)

goole's point is a good and valid one but if it were up to me, I would pick a judge mostly to reward those who have been in the system and done what I considered good work.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:33 (fifteen years ago)

Presidents have nominated almost as many non-judges to the court as those with years of experience.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

it's probably best that I am not President because I would try to do everything in my power to get one of the following people on the Supreme Court:

Judge Joe Brown
Judge Mathis
Judge Judy
Judge Milian of "The People's Court"
Judge Toler of "Divorce Court"
Judge Mablean Deloris Ephriam, formerly of "Divorce Court"

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:37 (fifteen years ago)

I don't want to re-argue Roe v Wade, but a large part of the huge controversy it's inspired over the years stems precisely because it seems like Blackmun "made things up by fiat," relying on Douglas' specious notion of a right to privacy coming from "emanations" and penumbras" in the Constitution.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

Isn't there a consensus or something approaching it in the legal profession that, regardless of what one thinks about abortion, Blackmun's opinion in Roe v Wade isn't a terribly strong one?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

dan, no love for judge reinhardt?

"I DONT WANT HOUSE CHICKEN I WANT THIS PLACE CHICKEN!" (stevie), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

shit, I forgot Judge Reinhold

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

iatee, I am curious as to why you think the SC should be overhauled? It's the least democratic of all branches of US govmt (and usuall its stability is lauded) and previous attempts to mess with it (I'm primarily thinking of FDR, of course) have not gone down well w/the public. I's like to see different justices sitting but that's not an overhaul, it's time and luck in presidential elections.

that previous attempts to mess with it haven't gone done well w/ the public doesn't necessarily convince me of anything other than 'it's a bad idea politically' which yeah, I'd agree on. politically it's probably impossible to really change the court.

but as things are, john roberts is going to be the sc chief justice for a significant % of our lives and the supreme court is going to lag behind the rest of the country politically for a long, long time. just looking at justice ages + likelihood of dem presidents, dem congresses - unless we get lucky, getting a progressive-friendly court might take 50 years.

overall the sc's an institution that's claimed its powers in a not esp constitutional manner and affects our lives in very significant ways. I'd be fine w/ serious reform. (but no I don't think it's politically even an option unless they start a serious legal grudge match w/ obama)

iatee, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)

shit, i can't spell judge reinhold...

btw http://gawker.com/5511614/the-bristol-palin-abstinence-psa-strategy-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do

"I DONT WANT HOUSE CHICKEN I WANT THIS PLACE CHICKEN!" (stevie), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

By it's very design the SC (and law in general) often lags behind popular opinion, though.

xpost

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:48 (fifteen years ago)

design? it designed itself

iatee, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

pretty sure The Supreme Court didn't write the Constitution

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:52 (fifteen years ago)

I understand part of that argument but surely you concede that it was established under Article 3 of the Constitution.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:53 (fifteen years ago)

that was ex-post

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:53 (fifteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marbury_v._Madison

iatee, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:54 (fifteen years ago)

(Correct me if I'm wrong MW but your point was more that the rules of government in the Constitution were explicitly defined to make it harder to change things than by simple majority vote, meaning that popular opinion will always be in a slightly different place from the law because of the number of votes necessary to change things, yes?)

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

Yes, Hi Dere.

I know it's been a mixed bag when you consider race and other civil rights issues but when I see tea baggery and Larouchites and jingoist mobs and demogoguery in legisilatures and Congress, I'm inclined to think that it may be the best an imperfect people can get.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:58 (fifteen years ago)

right but being that

a. the sc wasn't particularly 'designed' as a political actor
and
b. the sc design was vague enough that you could have a popular president stuff to court

I find it hard to really think that it's 'conservative' even in that sense

the senate otoh, sure

iatee, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

Isn't there a consensus or something approaching it in the legal profession that, regardless of what one thinks about abortion, Blackmun's opinion in Roe v Wade isn't a terribly strong one?

Ruth Bader Ginsburg is one of those people.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

stuff *the* court xp

iatee, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

or "stack the court" that's what people say right

iatee, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:01 (fifteen years ago)

b. the sc design was vague enough that you could have a popular president stuff to court

This was one of FDR's arguments during the court-packing nonsense: the Court grew and contracted several times in the 19th century.

by the way, I'm reading this now, and it's absolutely essential reading.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:01 (fifteen years ago)

Cool, Alfred, I'll check that out.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

The whole Marbury vs Madison thing I've never really understood is that Marshall basically just said that the court had review over all branches. Who was to stop him from saying that? Congress? How? Unless they impeached the court, they could simply say that any Judiciary Acts that specifically dealt with the SC's authority.

Regardless, allowing each branch of govmt to determine the constitutionality of the acts, however popular that has been with several presidents, is a shitty way to run a government.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

they (the Court) could simply say

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)

Article Three.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

Reading that book, it's amazing how ineptly a master like FDR handled the issue of a "calcified" court. Rather than using his considerable persuasive powers to explain how the conservatives of the Court had doomed the New Deal, or even amending the Constitution as some Progressive and Democratic senators wanted, he rather weaselly accused the justices of being behind in their cases and too old and doddering.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

The whole Marbury vs Madison thing I've never really understood is that Marshall basically just said that the court had review over all branches. Who was to stop him from saying that?

right - there wasn't really a means for stopping him within the constitution. it was a design error. we've accepted judicial review as law, but it's still not technically "constitutional" and it's definitely not by design.

iatee, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:13 (fifteen years ago)

Hamilton was clever enough to have suggested judicial review, apparently.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

there wasn't really a means for stopping him within the constitution.

The Constitution could be have been amended.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

right, and the constitution could be amended tomorrow so that the supreme court no longer exists

iatee, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

Andrew Jackson: "John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it."

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:19 (fifteen years ago)

LOL, from the WP's book twitter:

roncharles

Publishing insider tells me my idea to send VA Gov McDonnell copies of BELOVED is taking off: 1111 E Broad St ., Richmond VA 23219 #slavery

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

proto-obama xp

a midsummer night's cream (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

http://twitter.com/roncharles

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

Andrew Jackson: "John Marshall has made his decision. Now let him enforce it."

That's why it's so clever, really. He basically just skipped the case altogether and said Congress had fcuked up in '89, arrogating to themselves powers not in the Constitution (while claiming an unstated one for the Court). It's awfully clever and a bit funny to me.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

not to be mr. practical but I don't really think gov mcdonnell is gonna get much out of beloved, or even read it, not even if he gets tens of thousands of copies in the mail

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)

really? it's a symbolic thing. i don't expect him to read it, but i do expect him to think about this sort of stuff in an intelligent way, even though Richmond still has a LOL Museum of the Confederacy

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think the "send representative/public figure a whole bunch of [item]" deal is an effective way of protesting, no - probably an effective way of fundraising but my suspicion is that anything that might be construed as "weird" will be conveniently described as such & filed away

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

i'm not saying it's a protest, i'm saying it's a way to get him to think about his lame ass pandering to Virginia rednecks

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:46 (fifteen years ago)

I am not sure he will think about the situation in the same terms

iatee, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:47 (fifteen years ago)

don't think the "send representative/public figure a whole bunch of [item]" deal is an effective way of protesting, no

What if it was "send representative/public figure a whole bunch of Jake Gyllenhaals"?

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:48 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I mean why not, it's lol, but I don't think it will give him even one second's reflection - "buncha nutjobs sending me a book, whatever" is what I think he or any politician in office thinks of stuff like this

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

well this accompanied by other things can perhaps help the governor remove his head from his ass--sorry for being so optimistic!

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:50 (fifteen years ago)

btw the Museum of the Confederacy is fascinating and everyone should go to it

also this doesn't seem to be effective at "fundraising" as much as it is effective at "getting Toni Morrison paid" which I am behind 100%

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:54 (fifteen years ago)

alfred's post led me to discover a truly wonderful blog (surprisingly sfw, given the url)

xpost well yes - go Toni for sure - I am personally administering beatdowns to people who send used copies

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:55 (fifteen years ago)

Julie and Kelley: Your Man Meat Experts!

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:57 (fifteen years ago)

both of you: burn in hell

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

lol

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

US Politics: Julie and Kelley: Your Man Meat Experts!

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 19:06 (fifteen years ago)

awesome

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/04/07/assassinations/index.html

a midsummer night's cream (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

I'm so fond of "twink will ferrell" but "your man meat expert" is vying heavily for new screen name

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

The Man-Meat

http://www.connollyco.com/discography/kraftwerk/man_hi.jpg

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

she's a meat model and she's looking good
*synth melody*

i'm 84 cars seesawing with demi moore (m bison), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

sending copies of beloved is a publicity move to call attention to the va govs idiocy more than a sincere attempt to turn him into a toni morrison fan imo

max, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 19:35 (fifteen years ago)

ok

I think this discussion is much less important than the link k3vin posted

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/04/07/assassinations/index.html

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

Why is he doing this? What's the up-side?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

I mean I wouldn't cross the street to piss on Anwar al-Awlaki if he were on fire but I don't understand why 'neutralizing' him is more important than basic Common Law protections against government overreach.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

I think the fuss over this just because it involves a US Citizen is a bit unseemly. So it's okay for the CIA to assassinate people if they're not US citizens?

o. nate, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)

commenters on the salon piece opining that they kinda can't imagine mccain doing something this over-the-line

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

that's pretty dumb of them

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

? of course mccain would do this, wth

xp

goole, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

I think the fuss over this just because it involves a US Citizen is a bit unseemly. So it's okay for the CIA to assassinate people if they're not US citizens?

I disagree. One of the things that the Constitution guarantees you as a citizen is due process. Non-U.S. citizens, you might argue, should be afforded the same benefit of the doubt that the Constitution gives an American citizen. But the point here is that the president, who knows the constitution quite well, is stripping a U.S. citizen of his right to due process under the law. Assassinations are nasty business no doubt, but an assassination that doubles down & violates the constitution is the exacta. imo

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

I agree it's a different animal from a legal perspective, but I don't see much difference from an ethical perspective. It's the ethical perspective I'm more concerned about.

o. nate, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

well there's a standing order to "kill or capture" pretty much all the major players, isn't there? I don't think Constitutional rights of citizens are really "the legal perspective" - they're really important -

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

the argument, if one were to try to make it, is that awlaki has, by dint of "joining" al-qaeda and/or "aiding" the 9/11 attacks, committed treason and renounced his citizenship, and the right of due process disappears, but there isn't time or safety enough to show everyone how they know that's true. bombs away!

goole, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

the argument, if one were to try to make it, is that awlaki has, by dint of "joining" al-qaeda and/or "aiding" the 9/11 attacks, committed treason and renounced his citizenship, and the right of due process disappears, but there isn't time or safety enough to show everyone how they know that's true. bombs away!

the thing is, any admin including this one could totally get away with passing into law something that listed the things you could do that were equivalent to renouncing your citizenship. it would suck to have such a law, but it'd be a piece of cake to get it passed. then you could kill whoever you wanted and at least be on the right side of the law. who knows, maybe that's comin' up - the auto-treason-conviction act

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

xp

'really important' yeah. but they're not more important than the larger ethical issue - which is that assassination is either 'okay in the right circumstance' or 'not okay ever'.

(ie o.nate otm)

iatee, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

. it would suck to have such a law, but it'd be a piece of cake to get it passed.

uh. do you really think so?

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

Sorry, J0hn but that kind of treasonsous talk just got you a visit from the drones.

xpost

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

uh. do you really think so?

you don't? Alan Grayson would oppose it, maybe a few other willing-to-rant types - everybody else wouldn't want to vote against "letting our soldiers do what they're trained to do" to the bad guys - I don't see in the House or Senate or in the public a lot of sympathy for the American citizens whose names would be paraded out. this is all paranoid fantasy land obv but yeah as long as we're here, I think such a measure would pass the house & senate easy, with some protesters yelling and getting called sympathizers

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

j0hn i think joining/aiding AQ or having aided the 9/11 attacks are already some of those things? that's what (some are arguing) the AUMF says

not that this isn't royally f'ed up. i don't even think it would be that hard to have the evidence for an order to kill him be public, but they don't even want to go that far.

there's an emerging line of thinking about obama's presidency that it's far too centralized on him as a decision maker -- this is quite apart from the MARXOFASCIST TYRANNY bs, but more a management thing that has its effects in various areas. i'll try to dig up some examples of ppl saying this if i can remember.

goole, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)

he's the decider!

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

this is all paranoid fantasy land obv

ding ding ding

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

j0hn raises a good point. i think of this every time the torture 'debate' bubbles up again. right wingers tie themselves in knots saying that US security services did absolutely nothing that brutal, yet we have the right (or must have even greater leeway) to do whatever brutal thing we can think of. and i think, jesus h, you could have ASKED the american people just how brutal they wanted to get sometime in mid 02 and congress would have approved any damn thing you could name. you could have amended the patriot act to REQUIRE waterboarding in such-and-such instance, and had 70% of america cheering you on to do it. why bother doing something illegal when you could have easily legalized it...

goole, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

more from ackerman

http://washingtonindependent.com/81594/the-national-security-case-against-killing-anwar-al-awlaki

goole, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

anyone who thinks this is okay watches too much 24

goon with the wind (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:05 (fifteen years ago)

Why did we ever ban torture anyway? We were such lily-livered pantywaists back in the 30s and 40s, I guess.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:14 (fifteen years ago)

T/S targeted assassinations vs. bombings killing innocent bystanders

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:26 (fifteen years ago)

hm do i have to choose just one?

goon with the wind (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

why don't they just revoke his citizenship and THEN assassinate him lolz

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

and have the whole thing take place in a courtroom, w/cameras

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:33 (fifteen years ago)

why don't they just revoke his citizenship and THEN assassinate him lolz

― modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, April 7, 2010 5:28 PM (6 minutes ago)

this is probably what's going to happen

a midsummer night's cream (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:35 (fifteen years ago)

I should probably angrier about this than I am but for some reason I am not. If this guy gets assassinated eh it wouldn't be the first time the US gov't assassinated citizens.

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:35 (fifteen years ago)

see FBI's targeted assassinations of Black Panther Party members, for one, and I'm fairly confident we were doing this shit back in the 30s and 40s too when there were actual honest-to-god anarchists and communists running around advocating overthrowing the gov't.

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

This is grotesque but when it came to Obama's foreign policy I convinced myself two years ago I was getting a silver-tongued Bush.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:37 (fifteen years ago)

and ha shakey i thought u were defending the assassination plot til i remembered this the USA, Israel, and national interest

xp oh

a midsummer night's cream (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:37 (fifteen years ago)

m fairly confident we were doing this shit back in the 30s and 40s too when there were actual honest-to-god anarchists and communists running around advocating overthrowing the gov't.

Never as many as Hoover and the right wanted you to believe.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:37 (fifteen years ago)

I'm not really defending it but I'm not really shedding any tears over it either. cynicism, I guess. this is what gov'ts do to protect themselves. the fact that it's even being openly discussed is kind of remarkable (if you had argued that the FBI was killing BP members back in the early 70s, which they were, you would not have been granted any time in the mainstream media)

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:39 (fifteen years ago)

Never as many as Hoover and the right wanted you to believe.

lol I'm sure you know me well enough to know that I'm coming at this from the radical leftist angle of marvelling that there was ever such a movement in the US to begin with (kinda undeniable that there was, no?), and not from one of right-wing paranoia

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:40 (fifteen years ago)

I guess the problem is I sympathasized with the radical leftist types the gov't saw fit to assassinate - I wouldn't shed any tears over Awlawki, his politics are loathsome.

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I got a couple of tears to shed any time an American citizen is denied due process, no matter who he is. due process is one of the things that actually-for-real is supposed to make us special. as a principle though it's all or nothing; there aren't shades of due process under the law depending on whether you're an outstanding citizen or not.

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

Yes, and once again we have to take the White House's word that this dead citizen was a Bad Person.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I agree with all that.

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:45 (fifteen years ago)

also sorry Alfred I think calling Obama a "silver tongued Bush" is off the mark given how incoherent, pathological, and intellectually vacuous Dubya's motivations were. Obama may arrive at some of the same decisions re: due process and wielding the US military, but he has a much more pragmatic and nuanced view of the world. Bush is essentially retarded. We invaded Iraq because he was crazy, not because there was actually anything to gain from it on any level.

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

beyond lynching the guy who "tried to kill [his] daddy"

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, I think the newspapers should print "on this day 8 years ago ..." every day.

xp

idm@hyperreal.org (lukas), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

We're continuing to support a miscellany of interests in Baghdad that doesn't serve the name "government," a war in Afghanistan whose origins have long been forgotten or modified, we continue to hold suspects indefinitely, and the White House undercuts its own attorney general.

If anything, Obama's intelligence and coherence is scarier than Bush's vacuousness.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

Yes, and once again we have to take the White House's word that this dead citizen was a Bad Person.

also come on its pretty clear Awlawki is a Bad Person, by his own admission. He'd be proud to be martyred by the US gov't. He may not have been proven guilty of any crimes in a court of law (which, yes, I believe is a prerequisite for any punishment) but it's not like the White House is making shit up out of thin air here.

xp

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

*serve = deserve

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

If anything, Obama's intelligence and coherence is scarier than Bush's vacuousness.

lol no way. get back to me when we invade another foreign country for no reason and bankrupt the economy in the process.

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

I mean complain all you want about Obama extending some of Bush's odiousness, but he is not even remotely on the same level. not even close. lolz American short-term memories.

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

My memory of Cold and post-Cold War presidents is long, my patience short, Shakes.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

jesus christ it's because Bush's follies aren't too far from my thoughts that Obama's look so odious.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

also come on its pretty clear Awlawki is a Bad Person, by his own admission.

I had my suspicions from the moment I heard his first 7", "Bad Person"

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:55 (fifteen years ago)

I'm curious what overall global anti-terrorism strategies y'all would be cool with Obama supporting. Withdraw from Afghanistan? Release all Gitmo prisoners that can't be tried in the civilian justice system because they were tortured? Not kill anybody? Serious question.

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:55 (fifteen years ago)

I had my suspicions from the moment I heard his first 7", "Bad Person"

wasn't that a split w/ Brujeria?

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 21:56 (fifteen years ago)

I'm perfectly fine with extradition agreements; it's a good start. "Winning hearts and minds" has a smooth capitalist coat (oil, uranium, opening markets, etc) to match its altruism.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:00 (fifteen years ago)

that O's not "on the same level" of awful (by a long shot) doesn't make his continuation of Bush policies easier to take for me personally, and as greenwald points out, even the Bush admin wasn't making the argument that we can just hunt down & kill American citizens if they've been keeping shitty company (or even aiding & abetting our enemies - it doesn't matter - once a country gives itself permission to kill its own citizens without trial & in the absence of immediate threat to anybody's personal safety, it's kinda game over)

I'm curious what overall global anti-terrorism strategies y'all would be cool with Obama supporting. Withdraw from Afghanistan? Release all Gitmo prisoners that can't be tried in the civilian justice system because they were tortured? Not kill anybody? Serious question.

I seriously can't believe you're asking this man. No policy that denies American citizens the rights that are guaranteed to them under the Constitution, and nothing that violates the Geneva convention, and nothing that violates this.

what's my solution - it doesn't matter - I'm not running for office - that doesn't make it ok to deny a US citizen his right to trial by his peers and the right to answer his accusers in open court

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:05 (fifteen years ago)

No policy that denies American citizens the rights that are guaranteed to them under the Constitution, and nothing that violates the Geneva convention, and nothing that violates this.

I'm cool with demanding all that - but Alfred raised a whole host of other issues re: Iraq and Afghanistan that are not really related to the rights of American citizens.

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:07 (fifteen years ago)

right I'm mainly concerned today with the admin putting a target on the back of a citizen who has the right to be tried

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)

like okay let's not torture anyone, let's grant everyone due process - but what do we do with the guys at Gitmo that were tortured? Just let them go? So that they can go back to Yemen/Baghdad/Afghanistan and bomb some more people? I just want to be clear on what our options are here.

as far as military engagement with a non-military enemy goes (which is essentially what we're doing in this "War on Terror") I don't think its at all clear what a both a) moderately successful and b) morally and legally acceptable policy would look like.

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)

like okay let's not torture anyone, let's grant everyone due process - but what do we do with the guys at Gitmo that were tortured? Just let them go? So that they can go back to Yemen/Baghdad/Afghanistan and bomb some more people? I just want to be clear on what our options are here.

gotta bring 'em to trial

if they get off and do more damage, gotta remember not to shit in own bed next time

it sucks, but imo it doesn't suck as bad as flushing one's principles down the toilet in response to one's own mistakes

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:11 (fifteen years ago)

like killing people with drones looks like a pretty cowardly and legally questionable way to go after these dudes, but what are the options - carpet bombing? nukes? permanent occupation of foreign countries? just pretending like radical jihadists are not actually a threat? you can't buy off every Bin Laden and Al Zwahiri follower with open markets and oil and uranium and opium. there's still gonna be this segment of the population that is batshit crazy and latching onto the most convenient philosophy available to justify their homicidal actions (which is what we're seeing with the recent spate of home-grown American jihadists - a subject I'll note that next to nobody has expressed any interest in besides me). what do you do with these people when they have serious means of destruction at hand, a network to support them, and the will to carry out mass murder. it's not conventional warfare, and the American judicial/law enforcement system does not and cannot be extended around the entire world - so how should we approach this problem?

xp

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:15 (fifteen years ago)

The U.S. joining the World Court would go a long way towards empowering that institution.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:19 (fifteen years ago)

If they're nuts, it's a mental health issue. As fantasy POTUS, I'd work to reposition the conflict in terms of institutionalization of people at danger to themselves and others rather than assigning combatant status.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:21 (fifteen years ago)

No offense, but what on earth does that mean?

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:23 (fifteen years ago)

ah yes the warm and cuddly, secure and well-funded American mental health industry

xp

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:24 (fifteen years ago)

I'm kinda with Philip but I'd add "more effective pro-Democracy outreach" - right now, if you were a guy wondering whether he believes what AQ teaches about the western countries, I'd guess your instinctive answer would be "yup...it's just like they say it is" - improving the brand image won't solve the immediate problem but addresses it down the line whereas presently policies guarantee eternal conflict

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:24 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I'm down with the World Court. we'd have to sacrifice some people, but I'm cool with handing over Kissinger, among others

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:24 (fifteen years ago)

right now, if you were a guy wondering whether he believes what AQ teaches about the western countries, I'd guess your instinctive answer would be "yup...it's just like they say it is" -

this assumes rational actors. grand-daddy of Egyptian Jihad was well versed in genteel middle America and spent a fair amount of time here. dude still turned into nutjob fanatic condoning the anal rape of his enemies' children.

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)

the thing is, any admin including this one could totally get away with passing into law something that listed the things you could do that were equivalent to renouncing your citizenship. it would suck to have such a law, but it'd be a piece of cake to get it passed. then you could kill whoever you wanted and at least be on the right side of the law. who knows, maybe that's comin' up - the auto-treason-conviction act

― Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Wednesday, April 7, 2010 4:15 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

The scary thing is that there is no list, which means they're basically just making shit up as they go along. And as long as there doesn't remain a list, and the reasons for being labeled an enemy combatant are fuzzy, and there's leeway to push it further and further.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think you can really improve the brand image of America with anything approaching the truth. because the truth about this country is not pretty, and it never has been. (I say this as someone who loves this country, but we have always been deeply, deeply flawed).

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:30 (fifteen years ago)

I'm curious what overall global anti-terrorism strategies y'all would be cool with Obama supporting. Withdraw from Afghanistan? Release all Gitmo prisoners that can't be tried in the civilian justice system because they were tortured? Not kill anybody? Serious question.

Yes. Yes. Yes. Divert all spending and forces from overseas occupation of Iraq & Afghanistan into strong national DEFENSE against any we have stirred up who would want to try something domestic. After a sufficient post-Iraq/Afghan 'blowback period' I'd say we'd be on our way to a full recovery, foreign-policy wise.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:32 (fifteen years ago)

"ah yes the warm and cuddly, secure and well-funded American mental health industry"

from what little i've read re: terrorist profiles, a lot of these dudes do sound like good candidates for meds.

also, if they're patients, you don't have to worry about bringing them to trial, charging them. their release is based purely on threat assessment.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:32 (fifteen years ago)

not sure Sayid Qutb would've been okay with being institutionalized/medicated by Americans

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:33 (fifteen years ago)

strong national DEFENSE against any we have stirred up who would want to try something domestic

lol the problem is there's no defense, really, against something like 9/11. airport screenings aren't gonna do shit, dude. and once they've exhausted one tactic, then they'll just move on to another, and then we're just caught up in an ever-escalating spiral of police state actions. is that what you want? cameras and cops and screenings at every corner? cuz that's what you're talking about.

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:35 (fifteen years ago)

a sufficient post-Iraq/Afghan 'blowback period' I

this sounds like a lot of fun to live through, btw

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:36 (fifteen years ago)

It's only gonna get more and more fun for you the longer we stay in these wars.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:38 (fifteen years ago)

we're gonna be out of Iraq within a year, I think that's great. Let's not pretend like that's a never-ending military engagement (and if you are gonna pretend like that then I expect you to also be furious about all the troops we have stationed in S. Korea and Germany and wherever the fuck else the US military's decided to hang out).

And I'll be surprised if we're still conducting major military operations in Afghanistan by the time Obama's running for a second term. But who knows, really - Pakistan and Iran are the real wild cards there.

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 7 April 2010 22:46 (fifteen years ago)

Let's not pretend like that's a never-ending military engagement

Until we have defeated the concept known as "terrorism" then it's kind of an on-going war, isn't it?

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 8 April 2010 02:55 (fifteen years ago)

arent we all ~~citizens of the world~~

max, Thursday, 8 April 2010 03:01 (fifteen years ago)

I kind of didn't think anything would make me wish I was still rehearsing awful Irving Berlin songs but that news article did it. That's reprehensible.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Thursday, 8 April 2010 03:34 (fifteen years ago)

nobel peace prize winning assassin

a midsummer night's cream (k3vin k.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 03:40 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think we've seen this one yet:

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l0gj5dkFZz1qzpwi0o1_500.jpg

requiem for crunk (kingfish), Thursday, 8 April 2010 05:37 (fifteen years ago)

Never knew they put douches in the remainder section.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 8 April 2010 05:52 (fifteen years ago)

any douche in a storm

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 05:56 (fifteen years ago)

we're gonna be out of Iraq within a year, I think that's great.

And I'll be surprised if we're still conducting major military operations in Afghanistan by the time Obama's running for a second term.

NAIVE MO COLLIER

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:31 (fifteen years ago)

South Korea and Germany have fairly stable governments, you cluck

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:36 (fifteen years ago)

I keep wondering about why we still have thousands of troops in Germany and Japan. South Korea they justify through pointing at North Korea's crazy dictator.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 8 April 2010 13:28 (fifteen years ago)

because they lost.

Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Thursday, 8 April 2010 13:30 (fifteen years ago)

It's thanks to US troop presence in Japan that we can enjoy inexpensive sashimi.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 8 April 2010 13:32 (fifteen years ago)

Ha. But why not shift most of those troops to Afghanistan or Iraq? I think the military just wants a nice safe European home (and Asian one) and you're right, helping the sashimi market.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 8 April 2010 13:33 (fifteen years ago)

South Korea and Germany have fairly stable governments, you cluck

so yr cool with us housing troops in countries with stable gov'ts, but not so cool with us housing troops in countries w historically unstable govt's? I'd wager the stability of post-war Korean and German gov'ts was pretty closely tied to the US military presence FYI (also calling the German gov't "stable" when it had collapsed like 3 times in 40 years, resulting in fascist police state prior to US intervention = uh waht)

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:17 (fifteen years ago)

We are not going to have a "Germany"-like presence in Iraq, we are gonna be fighting this same war for years.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:19 (fifteen years ago)

housing troops in countries w historically unstable govt's

this is generally called "fighting" btw

goole, Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

also calling the German gov't "stable" when it had collapsed like 3 times in 40 years, resulting in fascist police state prior to US intervention = uh waht)

?? US troops may have been a stabilizing force for post-war Germany but surely also must be considered the economic devastation of the war, millions of dead, global shame, a divided country and having a nuclear Russia breathing down your neck; it may have taken a while for Germany to grow up but when the chips were down, they finally did.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

well yeah of course. I dunno what Morbius meant by calling Germany a "stable" gov't

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 April 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

So since the NY Times and the Washington Post accepted the White House spin that the radical talking American citizen Awlawki is now a Yemen-based terorist, and that the US govt can piggyback on loose connections to 9/11 and take him out with no due process, this has gotten little further mainstream press attention. NPR seems more interested in nuclear weapon minutia.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 8 April 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

Cuz you know if Bush did it he's a war criminal. I don't like to play the boring double-standard game, but this is too much.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 8 April 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

Yep

curmudgeon, Thursday, 8 April 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

not to be overly cynical, but don't we kind of take for granted that all presidents end up as war criminals, one way or another? barack obama has already overseen plenty of civilian deaths. that doesn't make the awlawki shape-shifting excusable, but, i mean ... of course obama's a war criminal, by any fair application of the term.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)

I mean... yes, but it's pretty unsettling to see dude jumping so eagerly into the war criminal pool

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

i...dont think obama suspending due process to assassinate a US citizen makes him a war criminal (this is without making a judgment on whether he already is one). it from my amateur pov reneges on his commitment to uphold the constitution & could be grounds for impeachment

k3vin k., Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:16 (fifteen years ago)

Isn't war criminal a legal term? AFAIK neither Bush nor Obama have been convicted as war criminals -- though I'll admit my knowledge of how trials in absentia are carried out for war crimes abroad is kinda sparse.

Mordy, Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:17 (fifteen years ago)

(Or is war criminal here just being used as a non-term of art -- just, 'he's done bad things, he's a war criminal.')

Mordy, Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:22 (fifteen years ago)

yeah mordy we get it it's ok if the good guys do it

k3vin k., Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)

uh -- is that what I said?

Mordy, Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

Hannity: would you like to see a palin/bachmann ticket?!?

WOULD I EVER!

apologies if it was posted before. it's difficult to keep up around here.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:29 (fifteen years ago)

Presumably you believe a State has a right to try its citizens for crimes against the State (like treason). If you don't, then this is an egregious but not isolated case of the State overreaching its authority. If you do, then the only question is; with an American citizen that the State wants to charge with treason, but because of political/geographic issues of feasibility can't assert authority over -- what is the best course of action? Do you try him in absentia and then send the assassination order? Do you send in troops, capture him, and then try him? What if that's not feasible at all? Do you just send in the assassination order? It's not a question of: OH OBAMA U EVIL WAR CRIMINAL. I agree that the US government should either try him in absentia or try to capture him and then try him. I'm hardly saying that it's okay to assassinate him without due process just because Obama is a "good guy."

Mordy, Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

Mordy's OTM. Other countries have produced war criminals for doing things we now do all the time but when it comes to international standards the US has always only looked out for its own immediate interest.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:31 (fifteen years ago)

did you just make a point or did I miss it

k3vin k., Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:35 (fifteen years ago)

You probably missed it.

Mordy, Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

i was talking about adam's post which otms you but i can't find a link between what he's otming and anything you've said

k3vin k., Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

(Or is war criminal here just being used as a non-term of art -- just, 'he's done bad things, he's a war criminal.')

it's more specific than "he's done bad things." the things the bush and obama administrations have done in terms of detaining people, labeling them "enemy combatants," conducting drone attacks into pakistan, a lot of that stuff falls under prosecutable war crimes. or it could, if anyone was going to seriously make an attempt to prosecute american presidents for war crimes, which isn't going to happen any time soon. (this isn't just american presidents, obv. a lot of heads of state could theoretically be charged with war crimes. it just doesn't happen much, for obvious reasons.)

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

Presumably you believe a State has a right to try its citizens for crimes against the State (like treason). If you don't, then this is an egregious but not isolated case of the State overreaching its authority. If you do, then the only question is; with an American citizen that the State wants to charge with treason, but because of political/geographic issues of feasibility can't assert authority over -- what is the best course of action? Do you try him in absentia and then send the assassination order? Do you send in troops, capture him, and then try him? What if that's not feasible at all? Do you just send in the assassination order? It's not a question of: OH OBAMA U EVIL WAR CRIMINAL. I agree that the US government should either try him in absentia or try to capture him and then try him. I'm hardly saying that it's okay to assassinate him without due process just because Obama is a "good guy."

― Mordy, Thursday, April 8, 2010 12:30 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark

uh

wait are you saying that assassination w/o due process is ok because a trial would just be too hard? and you're suggesting that a trial in absentia (which is unconstitutional, btw) would be a reasonable alternative?

not all good, not all right: the rest is just sounds (gbx), Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

The trial wouldn't be too hard. The problem would be in extracting him safely (esp if he's an enemy combatant). I'm not an expert in the area, so I'm not weighing in on the particular situation, but it seems to me that if you believe the government has the right to try its citizens, then you must believe they should be allowed to deal with this guy, right?

Mordy, Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

if you believe that american citizens have the right to due process, then you must believe that the government can't assassinate this guy if they can't convict him in a fair, open trial, right?

k3vin k., Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:58 (fifteen years ago)

dude, he is an incendiary cleric w/alleged (and probably solid) connections to al-qaeda. while the US gov't has the right to try him for treason as a US citizen, i'm still baffled as to why this guy is such a high-profile target for any reason other than "he's a US citizen." while i'm sure he may have served as a spiritual midwife for domestic jihadists (or w/e), i'm also not sure exactly ~what~ is illegal about that (conspiracy, probably). moreover, i'm not sure what THREAT he presents to the US, besides being an american who likes terrorists and who could, in theory, help potential bombers....learn english? find their way around a road map? get in touch with ppl who'd offer safe haven? he's a fixer, if anything, not a terrorist. putting him on a list of ppl to be merc'd is some chest-puffing by the US gov't to warn homegrown would-be terrorists that their citizenship means fuck all when the chips are down, and how DARE they hate the country that raised them, we'll show em etc.

so yeah, to answer your q: they should be allowed to "deal with him" in as much as they should be allowed to "deal with me" for running a red light or mugging an old lady. neither of which require summary, pre-trial execution.

not all good, not all right: the rest is just sounds (gbx), Thursday, 8 April 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

if you believe that american citizens have the right to due process, then you must believe that the government can't assassinate this guy if they can't convict him in a fair, open trial, right?

replace "can't" with "shouldn't" IMO but this is my position

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

yeah ditto

which does not include trial in absentia, which is a concept that is a) pretty explicitly unconstitutional and b) totally repugnant

not all good, not all right: the rest is just sounds (gbx), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

Yes, I believe he should have a fair, open trial. But I also believe we need provisions for dealing with citizens who refuse to come to trial. What happens when the police come to your door and you refuse to come out? I guess ideally we should issue a warrant, send a drone over his house, and demand his surrender. And if he refuses, the US should attempt to raid his location to arrest him. And if they're met with armed resistance, they should shoot back. Or follow whatever protocol is set in place by the Federal government for arrested citizens. Of course, for all I know, they already did all of this.

Mordy, Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

But I also believe we need provisions for dealing with citizens who refuse to come to trial.

oh ffs dude

not all good, not all right: the rest is just sounds (gbx), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

we have a mostly functional criminal justice system!

not all good, not all right: the rest is just sounds (gbx), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

arresting ppl that don't want to be arrested (ALL OF THEM) is something we do EVERY FUCKING DAY

not all good, not all right: the rest is just sounds (gbx), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

But I also believe we need provisions for dealing with citizens who refuse to come to trial.

Isn't this where Dog the Bounty Hunter comes in? Hey, I have an idea....

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

in fairness, most of these people are actually in the US (see the Roman Polanski thing for what I think Mordy is referencing)

I'm wholly opposed to assassination unless I get to do it.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)

But I also believe we need provisions for dealing with citizens who refuse to come to trial.

uh-oh. roman polanski better watch the skies.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)

xpost...

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

People seem to be overlooking a key point here which is that all this stuff is taking place in foreign countries. The US has no legal ground to stand on to arrest or kill anyone, citizen or not, in another sovereign country. So analogies to what the US would do with criminals on US soil seem beside the point. It's amazing to me that people seem to accept so readily the idea that the US can go into any country in the world and arrest or kill people as long as they're not US citizens.

o. nate, Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

the point is that: no matter how hard it is to arrest someone, you are not allowed to kill them instead because it's easier or more satisfying. at the very least, you have to play-act the scenario you described above.

besides, at this point we're ignoring the central issue here: summarily bumping an untried US citizen to the assassination list because we're just fukkin ~miffed~ at him is 100% against the law unless there exists some piece of legislation (as discussed upthread) that instantly revokes someone's citizenship if they do....something. but even THAT would be illegal, since a person would have to be tried first.

not all good, not all right: the rest is just sounds (gbx), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:10 (fifteen years ago)

can't believe polanski is still overseas teaching terrorists to have sex with minors

velko, Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

also, o. nate: pretty sure the US actually can, legally, go swipe their own citizens for trial if agreements have been made with the host country. the reason we can't go get polanski is precisely because france won't extradite him. but if, say, he set foot in a country that WAS willing to extradite him, the Feds would be there with the local gendarmerie with the handcuffs.

not all good, not all right: the rest is just sounds (gbx), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

uh... http://www.theimproper.com/film/?p=469

that happened already, remember? we had like a bazillion threads about it

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

If there are agreements in place by which the other government explicitly grants us permission, then yes, but even then, I don't know if the US would be the ones actually arresting - though they might be present. But it requires the permission of the other country. But already you're getting into legal grey areas with respect to constitutional protections. My US citizenship doesn't guarantee me US legal protections in a foreign jurisdiction.

o. nate, Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:15 (fifteen years ago)

The US aren't the ones arresting, it's the local police, who then hand the suspect over to US custody.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

btw My point re: Mordy's point wayy earlier was about "War criminal is a legal term" and basically US is #1 at the lawyer game amiright ppl?

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:19 (fifteen years ago)

What if a foreign country which has a different legal system than ours decides that some US citizen is a terrorist and they assassinate him on their soil? Let's assume that by their legal system they are allowed to do this. Has any law been broken? I don't think so. Now what if the foreign country subcontracts out the actual assassination to US agents. It's ugly, but is it illegal? Remember, the US has no jurisdiction over things that take place on foreign soil.

o. nate, Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

yes valuable contribution xp

k3vin k., Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

Now, what if there was beer? KEYSTONE Beer!

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

i'm almost certain that in a situation where a militarized police operation was necessary for the arrest (ie awlaki), provisions exist that allow for the aid of deputized foreign assistance or w/e. maybe a local has to actually ~arrest~ the suspect, but obtaining him may require some help, and i'd bet that's legally OK in some countries.

point is: NONE OF THIS OUGHT TO BE MYSTERIOUS TO YOU. ppl skipping the country to run away from criminal prosecution is an actual everyday occurrence. pretending that there isn't enough procedural guidance in place in order to justify assassination is just bananas.

not all good, not all right: the rest is just sounds (gbx), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/aa192/RandALLin/hollaback-girl-gwen-stefani-195.jpg

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

oops sorry that was hueger than I thought

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

guys "murderer" is a fucking legal term, too

not all good, not all right: the rest is just sounds (gbx), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:26 (fifteen years ago)

ditto "genocide," etc.

i mean, if the point is that someone isn't a war criminal until they've been CONVICTED of war crimes, then yes, congratulations, you understand how law works. ty for yr input

not all good, not all right: the rest is just sounds (gbx), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

http://reason.com/archives/2010/04/06/the-914-presidency/

goole, Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

wait so can we assassinate Obama without a trial for being a war criminal

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

Certainly I don't agree with most of his points, but at least this fool probably wrote something coherent.

filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:41 (fifteen years ago)

haha!

oh wait that's probably not supposed to be an empty post

goole, Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

Isn't this where Dog the Bounty Hunter comes in? Hey, I have an idea....

Nice try, but bounty hunters are illegal in almost every country but the US.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Thursday, 8 April 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, if the point is that someone isn't a war criminal until they've been CONVICTED of war crimes, then yes, congratulations, you understand how law works. ty for yr input

Unlike murder and genocide, it's far less clear to me -- outside a legal structure where someone is convicted -- what makes someone a war criminal. A murderer kills someone, a genocide occurs when a large group of people are killed for ethnic, religious, national, etc reasons. But what is a war crime? Wiki says one definition is "the wanton destruction of cities, towns and villages, and any devastation not justified by military, or civilian necessity." Who makes the case for the justification? I don't have the information to know exactly what is and isn't justified. That might be a failing on my part (I should be more educated), but I feel I can make a personal moral decision on murder or genocide much easier. Is targeting a citizen of your country that you believe to be a traitor a war crime? Can you be charged in Geneva for doing that? There's something wrong with it obv (I wrote above that I believe he should be brought to trial), but calling it a war crime means nothing to me. Might as well call it a murder. That's why I was asking if war crime is just shorthand for, "This blows and is ethically problematic." In which case -- say that?

Mordy, Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:39 (fifteen years ago)

xpost

The USA rarely lets a little thing like the laws of other countries stand in its way when it wants to commit a crime. This makes it similar to almost every other nation, except we enjoy the unrivaled privilege of being too powerful to have the snot kicked out of us for our criminal activites, therefore we abuse this privilege as a matter of course.

Aimless, Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:42 (fifteen years ago)

Just to be the Devil's advocate, were CSA soldiers deprived of their lives and liberty w/o due process. What process is required when someone is vocally in armed revolt against the United States?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

*sigh* mordy I dont think anyone called it a war crime, and if they did they misspoke. And it's not even near the point

k3vin k., Thursday, 8 April 2010 19:57 (fifteen years ago)

don't be a asshole dude.

So since the NY Times and the Washington Post accepted the White House spin that the radical talking American citizen Awlawki is now a Yemen-based terorist, and that the US govt can piggyback on loose connections to 9/11 and take him out with no due process, this has gotten little further mainstream press attention. NPR seems more interested in nuclear weapon minutia.

― curmudgeon, Thursday, April 8, 2010 5:09 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Cuz you know if Bush did it he's a war criminal. I don't like to play the boring double-standard game, but this is too much.

― filling the medicare donut hole with the semen of liberal (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, April 8, 2010 5:31 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Yep

― curmudgeon, Thursday, April 8, 2010 5:43 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

not to be overly cynical, but don't we kind of take for granted that all presidents end up as war criminals, one way or another? barack obama has already overseen plenty of civilian deaths. that doesn't make the awlawki shape-shifting excusable, but, i mean ... of course obama's a war criminal, by any fair application of the term.

― hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Thursday, April 8, 2010 6:05 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

I mean... yes, but it's pretty unsettling to see dude jumping so eagerly into the war criminal pool

― Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Thursday, April 8, 2010 6:06 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i...dont think obama suspending due process to assassinate a US citizen makes him a war criminal (this is without making a judgment on whether he already is one). it from my amateur pov reneges on his commitment to uphold the constitution & could be grounds for impeachment

― k3vin k., Thursday, April 8, 2010 6:16 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark

Mordy, Thursday, 8 April 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

That last comment, btw, was yours. >>>> *SIGH* <<<<< (look, I can show my exasperation with people online through typing out physical gestures too! *smile*)

Mordy, Thursday, 8 April 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

What process is required when someone is vocally in armed revolt against the United States?

this is a good and relevant question but I think it's muddled by actual state actors/declarations of war being involved, no...?

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 April 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

it seems pretty obvious from context that people are using the phrase "war criminal" as shorthand for it from my amateur pov reneges on his commitment to uphold the constitution & could be grounds for impeachment

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Thursday, 8 April 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

yeah well ill agree with mordy that yall shoudn't be using that shorthand, and the reiterate my point that it doesnt fucking matter, it's still not OK

k3vin k., Thursday, 8 April 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

and then* reiterate

k3vin k., Thursday, 8 April 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think so - "war criminal" designation has more to do with violating the sovereignty of other nations than it does the Constitution, which, y'know, doesn't concern itself much with the rights of other countries.

xp

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 April 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)

Back to the alleged actions taken by Obama--
The (imho) weak or unsupported arguments quoted or described in the NY Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/world/middleeast/07yemen.html?hp

“The danger Awlaki poses to this country is no longer confined to words,” said an American official, who like other current and former officials interviewed for this article spoke of the classified counterterrorism measures on the condition of anonymity. “He’s gotten involved in plots.”

As a general principle, international law permits the use of lethal force against individuals and groups that pose an imminent threat to a country, and officials said that was the standard used in adding names to the list of targets. In addition, Congress approved the use of military force against Al Qaeda after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. People on the target list are considered to be military enemies of the United States and therefore not subject to the ban on political assassination first approved by President Gerald R. Ford.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 8 April 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

And in the Washington Post:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/06/AR2010040604121.html?hpid=topnews

"He's recently become an operational figure for al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula," said a second U.S. official. "He's working actively to kill Americans, so it's both lawful and sensible to try to stop him." The official stressed that there are "careful procedures our government follows in these kinds of cases, but U.S. citizenship hardly gives you blanket protection overseas to plot the murder of your fellow citizens."

curmudgeon, Thursday, 8 April 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

just wondering--are people more or less outraged by extrajudicial assassination of american citizens, or revelations of extradition and cia black sites?

im noticing in myself a very real and very disappointing moving of the goalposts where the execution of someone like awlaki seems... moderate... in comparison to some of the horrendous torture programs and legal black holes like guantanamo.

max, Thursday, 8 April 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

it's not moderate, each is atrocious and we should stand for exactly none of them in no order. ranking them does nothing

k3vin k., Thursday, 8 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

kk otm

not all good, not all right: the rest is just sounds (gbx), Thursday, 8 April 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)

well, I do think one potential use of the control of information flowing from Abu Ghraib & Guantanamo is reaching a point in the dialogue where some stuff - guys who get killed in custody, say - gets described as a "grey area" since what "grey area" means is "green light."

"moderate" assassination is like yeah I would rather eat a moderate amount of shit instead of a 12-course shit banquet but the essential principle "I don't want to eat shit" still applies

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Thursday, 8 April 2010 21:55 (fifteen years ago)

it seems pretty obvious from context that people are using the phrase "war criminal" as shorthand for it from my amateur pov reneges on his commitment to uphold the constitution & could be grounds for impeachment

no, like i said, it's more specific than that. in obama's case, his potential war-crime liability mostly comes from continuing and/or failing so far to effectively cease bush-era policies and practices (gitmo and our detention programs more generally), but also from his increased reliance on drone attacks in pakistan, a country we are not at war with and that has not (officially) given us permission to conduct operations inside its borders. and ok, that's sort of a technicality because it's generally accepted that pakistan has given us some kind of secret nod-and-wink on that stuff, but the concept of war crimes relies on legal technicalities just like the concept of any kind of prosecutable crime. so i don't think it's hyperbole to say you could make a good case against obama as a war criminal, or that you could make a good case against any american president of at least the last 100 years on those grounds. (and much farther back than 100 years if we count war crimes against american indians.) which is all really mostly a rhetorical point, obviously, because we will not see prosecution of anybody above the rank of lieutenant for war crimes ever, probably. but it's not a meaningless distinction.

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 8 April 2010 22:28 (fifteen years ago)

Have we mentioned this bit yet?

http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/04/07/sex_ed_prosecutor_wisconsin/index.html

A Wisconsin prosecutor is threatening teachers with arrest for following the state's sex education curriculum. Scott Southworth, a district attorney in Crazytown Juneau County, has sent letters warning five different school districts that following a new law requiring schools with sex ed programs to teach students about STDs and pregnancy prevention could lead to criminal charges for contributing to the delinquency of minors. It's all very logical, you see: Ignore the law, avoid arrest!

"Forcing our schools to instruct children on how to utilize contraceptives encourages our children to engage in sexual behavior, whether as a victim or an offender," he wrote in the letter. "It is akin to teaching children about alcohol use, then instructing them on how to make mixed alcoholic drinks." Southworth must have bombed the analogy portion of the SATs; it's more like teaching teens about alcohol use and then instructing them on how to avoid alcohol poisoning and drunk driving.

The legislation doesn't even require schools to teach sex ed but rather sets standards for those that do. Southworth would like to see all of those voluntary classes come to a screeching halt until the "sick and shameful" law is repealed. He says the new curriculum will "lead to more child sexual assaults," instruct "children on sex-for-pleasure" and allow "health care providers" to "market sexually-oriented products" -- as in contraceptives -- "to our children."

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Thursday, 8 April 2010 22:34 (fifteen years ago)

Tom Coburn, still a schmuck:

Coburn: Blocking Unemployment Benefits Is Fine Because It Only Affects A ‘Small Amount Of People’

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Thursday, 8 April 2010 22:37 (fifteen years ago)

wtf @ u sconny

would love to see that mf try to jail teachers for sex ed. he will be shaaaaaaaaaaamed

not all good, not all right: the rest is just sounds (gbx), Thursday, 8 April 2010 22:40 (fifteen years ago)

I like how the only two options for sexual interaction are offender or victim.

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Friday, 9 April 2010 00:27 (fifteen years ago)

winning comments on that article

I'd have to say with the internet these days,sex education in the schools is a total waste of money.
Whats next the plastics companies,batterys,debbie does dallas videos etc....porn is NOT love and Love is not porn,it's intimacy between 2 consenting (adults)!
In an age where kids are busy with their ipods,ipads,text messaging,computer forums,etc....and of course judging a book by it's cover,never bothering to look for the information in between.Im not surprised @ this subject matter.
Sex is for procreation,and we've turned it into a festival event.

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Friday, 9 April 2010 03:06 (fifteen years ago)

Sex is for procreation,and we've turned it into a festival event.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm!

a cross between lily allen and fetal alcohol syndrome (milo z), Friday, 9 April 2010 03:09 (fifteen years ago)

this person is advocating banning batteries?

goon with the wind (J0rdan S.), Friday, 9 April 2010 03:10 (fifteen years ago)

god is SUCH a prick if he meant sex to be only for procreation but decided to make it pleasurable for LOLZ

latebloomer, Friday, 9 April 2010 03:10 (fifteen years ago)

Also, in light of recent events, it seems relevant to post this here again:

http://img213.imageshack.us/img213/7417/obamamtdoom.jpg

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Friday, 9 April 2010 03:18 (fifteen years ago)

April 9, 2010

My dear Mr. President:

Having concluded that it would be in the best interests of the Court to have my successor appointed and confirmed well in advance of the commencement of the Court’s next Term, I shall retire from regular active service as an Associate Justice, under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 371(b), effective the next day after the Court rises for the summer recess this year.

Most respectfully yours,

Justice John Paul Stevens

submitted this morning.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)

oh shiiiiiiit

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:15 (fifteen years ago)

huh?

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 15:16 (fifteen years ago)

I'm pretty sure MY boss requires more notice than that.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 9 April 2010 15:16 (fifteen years ago)

lol. was expected. obama's been quietly evaluating possible successors.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 15:16 (fifteen years ago)

I predict GOP filibuster of whoever O nominates

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:17 (fifteen years ago)

like, this is gonna be right for the mid-term elections - time for grandstanding!

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:17 (fifteen years ago)

IT'S ON

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:17 (fifteen years ago)

no realistic chance any of the conservative justices leaving during obama's first (or -- to get a bit ahead of ourselves -- second) term, is there? they're all (relatively) young.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 15:17 (fifteen years ago)

Scalia is 74 that's not young

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)

It's not really summer unless we have a Supreme Court confirmation fight.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)

the person obama's most closely considering (the solicitor general, i think) already survived a senate confirmation, so v. possibly no filibuster. and she's v. liberal, apparently.

as was pointed out in the NYT a few days ago, yesteryear's leading liberal candidate -- lawrence tribe -- is no longer a real possibility, because of age, i guess, and the real likelihood that he would be filibustered.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)

no realistic chance any of the conservative justices leaving during obama's first (or -- to get a bit ahead of ourselves -- second) term, is there?

None unless Scalia chokes on a dick.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)

stupak resigning too

max, Friday, 9 April 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)

Scalia, btw, is now second in command.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)

I'm pretty sure MY boss requires more notice than that.

??? He's giving over two months notice

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)

no realistic chance any of the conservative justices leaving during obama's first (or -- to get a bit ahead of ourselves -- second) term, is there?

________________________

None unless Scalia chokes on a dick.

geez, what are the chances?

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 15:21 (fifteen years ago)

this is concerning though:

Stevens' departure will not change the court's conservative-liberal split because Obama is certain to name a liberal-leaning replacement. But the new justice is not likely to be able to match Stevens' ability to marshal narrow majorities in big cases.

Stevens was able to draw the support of the court's swing votes, now-retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and Justice Anthony Kennedy, to rein in or block some Bush administration policies, including the detention of suspected terrorists following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, its tilt toward protecting businesses from some lawsuits and its refusal to act against global warming.

Earning your Masters in Library and Information Science is beautiful (schlump), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

Oh OK, my boss asks for two.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 9 April 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

This term ends last week of June

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

In that new Scalia biography I learned the guy still smokes heavily.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

Really?????

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)

porn is NOT love and Love is not porn,it's intimacy between 2 consenting (adults)!

Porn is intimacy between 2 consenting adults?

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)

Stevens was able to draw the support of the court's swing votes, now-retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor and Justice Anthony Kennedy, to rein in or block some Bush administration policies, including the detention of suspected terrorists following the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, its tilt toward protecting businesses from some lawsuits and its refusal to act against global warming.

Yes, but it's not Stevens' fault that the only swing vote on this court is Kennedy. The era of Lewis Powells, Potter Stewarts, and O'Connors is gone.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)

kennedy's swunnnnng right back to being a ballache over the last couple of years iirc anyhow

Earning your Masters in Library and Information Science is beautiful (schlump), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:24 (fifteen years ago)

i imagine Ginsberg will get out before Scalia. there's a good chance that even w/ a 2nd Obama term none of the grade-A assholes will be replaced : /

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

Obama could nominate Robert Bork and the GOP would probably filibuster at this point tbh.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

It's funny how every article and book on the current court emphasizes how much of a primadonna Kennedy is – he'll go with any majority that convinces him he's saving the Republic.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

he seems like a primadonna, tbh

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

In that new Scalia biography I learned the guy still smokes heavily.

did not know this. keep it up Nino!!

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

Well, thanks to him I can bugger men legally, so I can't hate him.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

Kennedy, that is.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

ahhh true--he's looking out for your butthole, that Kennedy

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

lawrence v. texas is pretty fuckin rad

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

04.09.10 -- 8:57AM // RECOMMEND RECOMMEND (12)
Josh's Keen Observation

Most people who make serious threats against the lives of lawmakers turn out to look a lot like people who'd make serious threats against the lives of lawmakers.

--Josh Marshall

Tracer Hand, Friday, 9 April 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

brilliant

Tracer Hand, Friday, 9 April 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

there's a good chance that even w/ a 2nd Obama term none of the grade-A assholes will be replaced : /

absent a justice falling ill, i'd say the chance of all conservatives justices gutting it out through a second obama term is about 95%.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

Jeffrey Rosen's profile from a few years ago is worth a lunchtime read.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)

so i don't think it's hyperbole to say you could make a good case against obama as a war criminal, or that you could make a good case against any american president of at least the last 100 years on those grounds. (and much farther back than 100 years if we count war crimes against american indians.)

Remember Alvy Singer's button collection? "Impeach Nixon, Impeach LBJ, Impeach Reagan [who hadn't been president yet]..."

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)

guys can we send some truckloads of cigarettes to Scalia

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)

can we still impeach reagan?

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)

ILM vs. Scalia

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)

i'm glad that bart stupak is retiring, now he can go back to playing tight end for the cincinnati bengals

Tracer Hand, Friday, 9 April 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)

These guys are so witless. The Sotomayor confirmation battle was apparently an example of Obama "walking on water."

Curt Levey, executive director of the Committee for Justice, tells TPMDC: "We'll certainly be involved one way or another. As the loyal opposition I'm sure we'll point out what we see as the weaknesses" of any Obama nominee.

But he continued: "It does depend on who he nominates -- if he nominates someone like Garland, there won't be a lot to complain it," referring to DC federal appeals court Judge Merrick Garland. "You'll have, if not a love fest, something close to it if it's a Garland. If it's a Wood or Karlan, you'd have a huge fight," says Levey, referring to Chicago appeals court Judge Diane Wood, whose name was floated last time around, and Pamela Karlan, a Stanford Law School professor.

During the Sotomayor fight, Levey was one of the loudest voices calling Sotomayor an intellectual light weight

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

I'm sure we'll point out what we see as the weaknesses" of any Obama nominee.

the "weakness" to be pointed out is that obama nominated him or her.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

Levey was one of the loudest voices calling Sotomayor an intellectual light weight

this amazes me. in a similar vein, my brother-in-law told me a few weeks ago that the (admittedly right-wing) news outlets he listens to confirms that, without his teleprompter to guide him, obama makes nearly as many pratfalls/mistakes, and has nearly as many awkward moments, as GWB.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

^^^quality media analysis there

would like to hear some of these pratfalls/mistakes

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)

WHEN THE TELEPROMPTER ISN'T ON, OBAMA STOPS SPEAKING AND STANDS MOTIONLESS. HE IS UNABLE TO FUNCTION.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 15:44 (fifteen years ago)

He says "um" a lot, which is apparently a sign of intellectual lassitude.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:44 (fifteen years ago)

actually, the "ums" are part of it.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 15:44 (fifteen years ago)

Critics don't know the "ums" are on the teleprompter.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:49 (fifteen years ago)

they do sound . . . "folksy."

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

Chief Justice Roberts' letter:

Associate Justice John Paul Stevens has earned the gratitude and admiration of the American people for his nearly 40 years of distinguished service to the Judiciary, including more than 34 years on the Supreme Court. He has enriched the lives of everyone at the Court through his intellect, independence, and warm grace. We have all been blessed to have John as our colleague and his wife Maryan as our friend. We will miss John's presence in our daily work, but will take joy in his and Maryan's continued friendship in the years ahead.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

meanwhile, over in the right-wing bloggysphere, this post defending sarah palin against obama is funny enough on its own, but it also has one of the greatest thread-comments ever, one that brings together cultural strands in a joyful and vibrant way:

WELL ALL YOU LIB'S WHO HATE SARAH PAILIN ARE JUST LIKE THE 'HIPSTER'S' WHO HATE THE INSANE CLOWN POSSE. WELL MANY OF US AMERICAN'S REALIZE THAT SARAH PAILIN IS THE ONLY HOPE FOR THE FUTURE OF AMERICA, JUST AS INSANE CLOWN POSSE IS THE ONLY HOPE FOR THE FUTURE OF MUSIC.

E'NOUGH SAID

hellzapoppa (tipsy mothra), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

E'NOUGH SAID

indeed

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

WELL

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

SARAH PAILIN

fuckin' rainbows! (latebloomer), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:08 (fifteen years ago)

was time for a new username anyway

INSANE CLOWN POSSE IS THE ONLY HOPE FOR THE FUTURE OF MUSIC (tipsy mothra), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:08 (fifteen years ago)

ENUFF Z'NUFF

Tracer Hand, Friday, 9 April 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

LOLZ that is too REAL

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 9 April 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

DOES ANYBODY UP IN THIS BITCH LIKE SARAH PAILIN

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:19 (fifteen years ago)

kind of makes me sad. i would have thought juggalos would have more or less been down w/ Obama

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:21 (fifteen years ago)

haha waht why on earth would you think that

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

Xtian redneck party clowns, why would they love an uppity black professor

modern eunuch-like crooning (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

Juggalodom is a pretty big tent

fuckin' rainbows! (latebloomer), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

idk i thought they might trend a little more open-minded than yr average redneck party clown...

note: i do not personally know any juggalos that i'm aware of

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

xpost yeah, i'd hate to hang the political leanings of the entire juggalo nation on one rabid palin nut, very possibly suffering from toxic levels of faygo

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

lol x-post

One Juggalo commenter does not represent the whole Juggalo Nation, y'all

fuckin' rainbows! (latebloomer), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

Juggalo maverick

degrease the kraken (brownie), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

Juggalodom is a pretty big tent

― fuckin' rainbows! (latebloomer), Friday, April 9, 2010 11:26 AM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark

yeah, pretty sure there's a fair number of dem juggaloes out there. KIP, u know

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

Juggalo maverick

Fightin' for America

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

Palin's view of nuclear weapons was shaped by her stint as the commander in chief of the Alaskan National Guard, our first line of defense against Soviet nuclear weapons.

ROFL

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

Mackenzie Eaglen, senior policy analyst for national security at The Heritage Foundation-

The Nuclear Posture Review unnecessarily takes sovereign U.S. options off the table when responding to various types of chemical or biological attacks.
Americans intuitively understand the flaw in this approach. Special agent Jack Bauer of "24" had to thwart terrorists attempting to steal nerve gas. If this had actually occurred, the President should not tie one hand behind the nation's back when evaluating the appropriate response to defend American citizens.

degrease the kraken (brownie), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

I literally do not have enough face to palm.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 16:55 (fifteen years ago)

President Harrison Ford had to thwart terrorists attempting to hijack his plane. If this had actually occurred...

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Friday, 9 April 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

President Morgan Freeman had to thwart a meteor attempting to collide with Earth. If this had actually occurred...

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Friday, 9 April 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)

President Bill Pullman had to thwart an alien attack. If this had actually occurred...

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Friday, 9 April 2010 17:13 (fifteen years ago)

These people would be pitiful if they weren't so hateful.

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Friday, 9 April 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

Greenwald on why Kagan would be a bad choice.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

These people would be pitiful if they weren't so hateful.

What have Freeman and Ford done to you?

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 17:15 (fifteen years ago)

Indiana Jones & the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. Morgan, yr ok.

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Friday, 9 April 2010 17:17 (fifteen years ago)

the President should not tie one hand behind the nation's back when evaluating the appropriate response to defend American citizens.

It's an executive order, which can be rescinded, if needed and its obvious intent is to encourage compliance with the IAEA and to push a wedge between Russia and Iran, hence the arms reduction treaty w/Russia. Coming from people whose favorite strategy for dealing with the possibility of nuclear Iran is to try to bomb them into the stone age (which is not only unlikely to work in that mountainous land, and likely to not only push the Green movement into the margins but also harden the resolve of the regime) a fantaisist scheme, given that we cannot afford another failed Asian military engagement (talk about late-Imperial fecklesss tantrums) but that it would be largely reviled by the world as excessive and criminal.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 9 April 2010 17:22 (fifteen years ago)

is anyone else watching this palin speech?

goon with the wind (J0rdan S.), Friday, 9 April 2010 17:57 (fifteen years ago)

she just said, with no hint of irony or self-awareness, regarding the recent obama energy speech, that "anything sounds good in front of a fighter jet"

goon with the wind (J0rdan S.), Friday, 9 April 2010 17:58 (fifteen years ago)

There's a line in there strictly saying in case of biological warfare nukes can be used anyways.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

Not in the Palin thing, the Obama nuke thing.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

she just said, with no hint of irony or self-awareness, regarding the recent obama energy speech, that "anything sounds good in front of a fighter jet"

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/assets_c/2008/11/Bush%20on%20Abraham%20Lincoln%20carrier%20small-thumb-425x330.jpg

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

I don't get it when has Obama ever said anything in front of a fighter jet

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

or did I just miss a speech

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

she just said, with no hint of irony or self-awareness, regarding the recent obama energy speech, that "anything sounds good in front of a fighter jet"

there is a legitimate point to be made here, but that legitimate point is "quit bitin' our style."

INSANE CLOWN POSSE IS THE ONLY HOPE FOR THE FUTURE OF MUSIC (tipsy mothra), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

Sarah Palin is a parasite making a media empire off being a 24/7 hater. Where would she be without Obama?

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

Being a state governor.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

Annoying everyone at a PTA meeting somewhere.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

she also said "the only thing missing was the theme from 'top gun' and joe biden in a fighter suit"

goon with the wind (J0rdan S.), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:26 (fifteen years ago)

if the left was halfway organized, 100 people would show up at her next speech waving signs with pictures of GWB speechifying in front of fighter jets with her words as a caption

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

she also said "the only thing missing was the theme from 'top gun' and joe biden in a fighter suit"

― goon with the wind (J0rdan S.), Friday, April 9, 2010 2:26 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

did she mean the berlin track or kenny loggins

max, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:28 (fifteen years ago)

highway to the
palin zone

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:29 (fifteen years ago)

did she mean the berlin track or kenny loggins

knowing Palin, she meant "Let's Hear It for the Boy" by Deneice Williams

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:30 (fifteen years ago)

Palin, as a media creature, feeds off outrage. Therefore she tries to sow a good crop of it every day. See also: Ann Coulter.

Aimless, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:30 (fifteen years ago)

no -- ann coulter is smart & aware enough to realize that -- sarah palin is a genuinely stupid person who thinks that she is earnestly leading some counter movement of real americans

༗ (J0rdan S.), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

Got you fooled, too, I see.

Aimless, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b276/oliver8bit/BushonAbrahamLincolncarriersmall-th.jpg

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

I have the impression that Ann Coulter pretty much has everyone watching her fooled

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:36 (fifteen years ago)

The only one who takes Coulter seriously is that toolbag from "The Today Show."

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

Ann Currie?

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

Well, who are smart lady politicians on the right (that aren't Ann Coulter)?

Philip Nunez, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

Laura Ingraham isn't smart, but she's blonde and conservative.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

also: she clerked for Justice Thomas.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

ann coulter isn't a politician

J0rdan S., Friday, 9 April 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

not...yet?

Philip Nunez, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:41 (fifteen years ago)

thinks that she is earnestly leading some counter movement of real americans

no. she's as calculated as they come.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

One can be earnestly calculating.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

ppl like ann coulter have literally nothing to gain from being a politician

J0rdan S., Friday, 9 April 2010 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

if you guys think that sarah palin can smell her own bullshit you're way too cynical

J0rdan S., Friday, 9 April 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

you have to be kind of a sick fuck to want to be in congress

J0rdan S., Friday, 9 April 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

yeah Palin dumb

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

Palin isn't the brightest wattage going, but all this has been explained to her and she knows which side her bread is buttered on. However, her schtick also includes the measurable possibility of higher office, so that is factored into how she plays her hand.

The media career comes first with her, but she won't queer the pitch for herself, in case a run at the presidency seems like a good idea later on. She has people for this, and a decent gut feeling for how it all works on camera.

Aimless, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

she knows which side her bread is buttered on

i seriously doubt that she knows how to butter a piece of bread

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:44 (fifteen years ago)

I want to be in Congress sometimes, just because I think yelling at people about some random, ultimately inconsequential law would be fun for like a day. Then I think about all of the meetings and writing etc and it's like "ugh fuck no"

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

also Palin is an avaricious magpie

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

^^^otm

Aimless, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:46 (fifteen years ago)

"ppl like ann coulter have literally nothing to gain from being a politician"
ratings!

From what little I've read, Palin is lacking both plain smarts and political wiles. GWB predicted she would look like an unprepared fool after a few weeks of her entry into the McCain campaign and he was right.

Philip Nunez, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:48 (fifteen years ago)

Magpie attacking young Democrat:

http://www.igijs.com/wp-content/myfotos/blogpost/magpie.jpg

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:50 (fifteen years ago)

Like, let's not twist ourselves into knots trying to imagine the Machiavellian masterminding behind Palin's image or whatever; she is a greedy, jealous little person who has learned how to present herself in a manner to get people to place her in situations where she can grab everything in sight with both hands and stuff them into whatever container is handy. There's nothing really more complicated or complex behind her or her quest for fame/power/glory than that; she just wants shit.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:50 (fifteen years ago)

^^^perfect

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:51 (fifteen years ago)

GWB predicted she would look like an unprepared fool after a few weeks of her entry into the McCain campaign and he was right.

where did you see that prediction?

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 18:53 (fifteen years ago)

i'm sure it's true. as with everything else, GWB's gut instincts were infallible.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 18:54 (fifteen years ago)

ha he very may well have said it on national TV, the mccain campaign was trying so hard to distance itself from him it hardly would matter

k3vin k., Friday, 9 April 2010 18:55 (fifteen years ago)

if politics were more like american idol, which i think would be a vast improvement, i think simon cowell would look the other way during the opening rounds - on account of palin's "x factor" - and i think she would make it quite far after that actually - but when push came to shove she would get buried

hmm actually that resembles real life more closely than i thought when i started writing it

Tracer Hand, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:56 (fifteen years ago)

There's no Machiavelli behind Palin's facade, just a few off-camera media types and some hungry political consultants who have hitched their wagons to her. The pretense that she is an outspoken leader is part of the fascination for viewers.

Aimless, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:57 (fifteen years ago)

(I find Michelle Bachman infinitely more fascinating/terrifying because my limited exposure to her convinces me that she actually is a poisonous racist white power scumbag who wants to dismantle the government and place everyone who doesn't fit into her Stepfordesque reimagination of America into a detainment facility and the only thing really keeping her from being able to execute on this vision is the fact that she is dumber than her underwear.)

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

palin would be better on dancing with the stars than on american idol.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

GWB predicted she would look like an unprepared fool after a few weeks of her entry into the McCain campaign and he was right.

Well, he would know.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

The pretense that she is an outspoken leader is part of the fascination for viewers.

but she is an outspoken person! maybe not a leader, because her poll numbers suck, but the people that love her really really love her

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

I won't ask how Dan saw Bachmann's underwear but wasn't sent to a detainment facility.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

re: GWB vs Palin, it's from Speechless (a tell-all book by ex speechwriter)
---
"I'm trying to remember if I've met her before. I'm sure I must have." His eyes twinkled, then he asked, "What is she, the governor of Guam?"
Everyone in the room seemed to look at him in horror, their mouths agape. When Ed told him that conservatives were greeting the choice enthusiastically, he replied, "Look, I'm a team player, I'm on board." He thought about it for a minute. "She's interesting," he said again. "You know, just wait a few days until the bloom is off the rose." Then he made a very smart assessment.
"This woman is being put into a position she is not even remotely prepared for," he said. "She hasn't spent one day on the national level. Neither has her family. Let's wait and see how she looks five days out."
---
GWB I'd describe as lacking regular smarts (and possibly learning disabled) but is surely no lightweight in terms of political wiles.

Philip Nunez, Friday, 9 April 2010 19:00 (fifteen years ago)

GWB isn't learning disabled, he just absolutely, genuinely does not give a shit, like not even a little bit.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:01 (fifteen years ago)

GWB was a hell of a politician.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 19:02 (fifteen years ago)

GWB was a hell of a sociopath.

a cross between lily allen and fetal alcohol syndrome (milo z), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)

^^^ basically

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)

If the ability to fool half the people for most of the time is the mark of a good politician, then Bush is it.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)

...in a sociopathic kind of way.

(damn! xpost to milo)

Aimless, Friday, 9 April 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)

I'd almost bet money he had dyslexia or something, though that doesn't preclude him from not giving a shit about it.

Philip Nunez, Friday, 9 April 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

Does that explain his interpretation of the Constitution?

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

i kind of hate to endorse the breathless pop-psyche interpretations of what palin "is" that andrew sullivan pumps out every other day, but i can't think of a better explanation.

we've all run into people in life who are a little bit further down the sociopathy/personality disorder spectrum. they talk too loud, they interrupt, they seem to not listen the the people around them, they tell innocuous but obvious lies, they seem unable to distinguish between facts and opinion or between an assertion and a demonstration (especially when it's something they care about), they don't get jokes, they don't read subtext or subtlety or emotional cues very well, but broadcast their own emotions without much of a filter. the broad world of facts does not seem to penetrate their inner life much at all, whatever feels true to them at the moment MUST be true.

and there's something about contemporary conservatism that renders itself unable to weed out or screen out people with these characteristics. how can you tell the difference between "unerring faith" and, well, psychosis?

this may explain bachmann better than palin

goole, Friday, 9 April 2010 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

I think so too. Palin looks like she laughs at Todd and her disabled daughter a lot.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

Speaking of Bachman, this quote (blogged today on Washington Monthly) is priceless:

"If in fact there is a nation who is compliant with all of the rules ahead of time and they've complied with the United Nations on nuclear proliferation, if they fire against the United States a biological weapon, a chemical weapon or maybe a cyber attack, well then we aren't going to be firing back with nuclear weapons," Bachmann said. "Doesn't that make us all feel safe?"

"No!" shouted the crowd of thousands in Minneapolis.

Basically Obama is wimp because he isn't countering cyber attacks with full-scale nuclear warfare.

Moodles, Friday, 9 April 2010 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

"fire a cyber attack"

J0rdan S., Friday, 9 April 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

I will admit that nuclear weapons seem like a perfectly acceptable response to spam

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:19 (fifteen years ago)

Palin is just a dumber, folksier version of Tracy Flick

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

well no, Tracy Flick wanted to change things and make a difference; Sarah Palin just wants what you have, and what your neighbors have, and what their neighbors have, and pretty much everything else under the sun

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

Tracy Flick grew up to be an average congressional aide asshole.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:28 (fifteen years ago)

in the sequel she runs for POTUS dontchaknow

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:29 (fifteen years ago)

(I don't think she wanted to change shit, she just wanted POWER and RESPECT)

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:30 (fifteen years ago)

Palin can't be Tracy Flick. Tracy Flick was smart.

Philip Nunez, Friday, 9 April 2010 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

Tracy Flick was also motivated to be a politician from the get-go; Palin fell into it at age 28 after attempting to become famous doing a bazillion other things

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

Palin can't be Tracy Flick. Tracy Flick was smart.

that's why I said DUMBER, FOLKSIER

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

Palin went to like 5 different colleges

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

itt SMC misunderstands the character Tracy Flick from "Election"

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:39 (fifteen years ago)

lol dude I bet I've watched that movie more than you have

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:42 (fifteen years ago)

oh man it's on

iatee, Friday, 9 April 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

shit is about to get heated.

massively heated.

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

itt SMC proves by SCIENCE! that you can watch a movie multiple times and still fundamentally misunderstand one of the main characters

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

lol that's better

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

^_^

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

ps sorry everyone for not getting massively heated, will do better next time

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

well you did use caps for science

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

altho seriously I'm not sure what you thought Tracy wanted to "change" about her school vis a vis winning the student body presidency. she didn't want to "make a difference", she didn't give a shit about anybody except herself! which is kinda the whole point of her character, that she's an overachieving egomaniac who will do anything/destroy anybody to get what she wants. (and that last bit is a verbatim quote from the movie dialogue just FYI)

xp

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:49 (fifteen years ago)

I'm just not feeling the overachieving nerd aura from Palin. I can see where a child pageant showbiz mom could be behind both character's neuroses, though.

Philip Nunez, Friday, 9 April 2010 19:53 (fifteen years ago)

(and that last bit is a verbatim quote from the movie dialogue just FYI)

getting lukewarm heated

iatee, Friday, 9 April 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

Basically, she wanted the power to browbeat everyone into being her (this is made more explicit in the college coda where she is working for a congresswoman). Her whole thing was predicated on getting into power and then "changing things" to be more to her liking (although the extent to which you can do that in a high school government is seriously neutered; the point seemed much more to be for her to get used to running for government early on so that when she did it for real, she'd be that much more prepared).

Other characters' assessments of her (that's a Broderick quote, isn't it?) aren't necessarily more accurate indicators of a character's motivation than the character's own internal monologue.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:55 (fifteen years ago)

Like, you are making an accurate statement based on one character's assessment of her and kind of completely ignoring what the character is saying about herself.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)

...which makes that statement less accurate

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)

I like this Adam Cadre piece on Tracy Flick: http://adamcadre.ac/calendar/12948.html

Gravel Puzzleworth, Friday, 9 April 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)

holy shit, I haven't seen that name in years

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

Dan I'll grant you that every character in the film serves as a classic unreliable narrator but even so have no idea what actions/dialogue would make you draw the conclusion that Flick wants to "browbeat everyone into being her" - the only time she expresses any outrage about other people is when they get in her way, otherwise she doesn't care what anybody does or says. Like back that up with some textual references and maybe I'll change my mind but I just watched this movie last week and nothing is springing to mind.

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

when she sums up her year as student body president, she doesn't express any satisfaction with changing people or even attempting to change people, primarily she points out that it was lonelier than she expected. and then she goes to college expecting it to be different, but everyone there treats her as an uptight killjoy as well.

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

I like that cadre piece a lot

iatee, Friday, 9 April 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

i thought election was mostly about matthew broderick's character deciding that a capable, ambitious woman should be taken down a peg, simple for being capable and ambitious

and yeah she isn't a lot of fun and i would have hated her in high school (actually had a couple frenemies who were very tracy flick) but idk, maybe she got that way by having to do everything on her own and having to be too perfect because teachers/mentors (which is what broderick is supposed to be) decide that really what's best for the girl is that she should be taken down a peg. but she probably would run the student government pretty well.

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)

*simply* for being capable and ambitious. sorry, can't write

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)

it's just been my observation that sometimes in unsupportive environments, yeah i do see women behave a little more uptight and perfectionist and other qualities that make tracy flick hard to like (but which have little to do with qualifications for the job), because the environment is, you have to be twice as good just to get taken seriously.

oh btw forget palin and bachmann, that is a sideshow. the one to really worry about in gop politics is LIZ CHENEY

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

a capable, ambitious woman

if that's all you got out of the character, I dunno, I feel like I watched a different movie

iatee, Friday, 9 April 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

lol this movie - I don't think Broderick hates her strictly because she's capable and ambitious (altho he does hate her for that, because it stirs up feelings of failure/inadequacy in himself), but he also hates her for "destroying" his teacher friend. Never mind that its actually his teacher friend who's really culpable there.

xp

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

and yeah Tracy's more than capable and ambitious, she's also a liar and a cheat

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

i feel like i missed a major phenomenon in "tracy flick." i'm not even sure if it's a movie or TV show or what.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

the one to really worry about in gop politics is LIZ CHENEY

watch out, it's a LIZASTER

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

Tracy Flick is one of the greatest film characters of the 90s, IMO.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

the one to really worry about in gop politics is LIZ CHENEY

one of my friends is preaching this non-stop. he/you/they may be right...

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

basically, after watching "Election" I pretty much decided that Reese Witherspoon was going to one day win an Oscar

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

i got it -- election. will pick it up at blockbuster.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

and yes Liz Cheney is actually more dangerous than Bachmann/Palin

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

also don't forget that Tracy tears down everyone's posters in a fit of immature rage and then immediately targets a scapegoat. this crosses the line from capable and ambitious to dishonest and vengeful. So on that score Broderick's kinda right to hate her and try to stop her, but his other motivations for doing so get in the way and complicate matters.

(I love this movie)

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)

it's a fucking incredible movie

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

a capable, ambitious woman
if that's all you got out of the character, I dunno, I feel like I watched a different movie

probably. tbh i saw it a long time ago, but i didn't think she was that bad & broderick was (she's just a high schooler after all).

wears suburban hang-ups on her sleeve like some kind of corporate logo (daria-g), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:31 (fifteen years ago)

Broderick is rightfully punished for his misdeeds. Flick is punished in the sense that she got what she supposedly wanted. The true heroine is the lesbian sister who makes a farce of the whole thing.

Philip Nunez, Friday, 9 April 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

^^^truthbomb

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

altho hapless jock is the most sympathetic character imho

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

when asked for a response about a Palin critique that he was like a kid poised for a playground fight who said 'Go ahead, punch me in the face and I'm not going to retaliate. Go ahead and do what you want to with me."

"I really have no response," Obama told ABC News. "Because last I checked, Sarah Palin's not much of an expert on nuclear issues."

hahaha OH SNAPS

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:47 (fifteen years ago)

last time i checked, sarah palin's not much of an expert on anything.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

Moose hunting? Self-promotion? Fauxlksy ways?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:54 (fifteen years ago)

Stephanopoulos ought to be ashamed even bringing that bs up. i mean, i'm glad he did, because Obabma's response is hilarious and otm.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)

but still.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Friday, 9 April 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)

he's a villager shitbag, that kind of qn is a job requirement

goole, Friday, 9 April 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

The true heroine is the lesbian sister who makes a farce of the whole thing.
that chick was so great in this and Freaks and Geeks, too bad she disappeared. and there is my OT contribution

Nhex, Friday, 9 April 2010 21:05 (fifteen years ago)

(she didn't just disappear, unfortunately, she also became incredibly hot FYI)

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 21:12 (fifteen years ago)

or maybe not, I might be confusing her with a diff't F&G actress...

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 21:14 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.iplugin.org/typo3temp/pics/9be2966f6e.jpg

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 21:16 (fifteen years ago)

I didn't know this:
Re: Stupak resigning

In one of his earliest floor ballots as a new federal lawmaker, Stupak voted against the landmark 1994 Freedom to Access Clinic Entrances Act (FACE Act) that set federal criminal sanctions for violent acts, threats and commercial interference by protesters at abortion clinics and churches.

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Friday, 9 April 2010 21:16 (fifteen years ago)

not gonna miss him. Dem challenger (and now presumed nominee) is pro-choice

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)

new dem nominee will not get elected in that district, i think.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 21:19 (fifteen years ago)

when asked for a response about a Palin critique that he was like a kid poised for a playground fight who said 'Go ahead, punch me in the face and I'm not going to retaliate. Go ahead and do what you want to with me."

"I really have no response," Obama told ABC News. "Because last I checked, Sarah Palin's not much of an expert on nuclear issues."

hahaha OH SNAPS

― Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, April 9, 2010 4:47 PM (38 minutes ago)

please tell me there is a video of this

k3vin k., Friday, 9 April 2010 21:26 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyvyKcDR33o&feature=player_embedded

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 21:30 (fifteen years ago)

The Corner has just about admitted that they'd be OK with Elena Kagan as a SCOTUS nominee, which means we must oppose her.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 21:37 (fifteen years ago)

"we"--do we suddenly have a say in the process? where do i fill out my ballot?

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 21:38 (fifteen years ago)

voting you in btw, al

Mr. Que, Friday, 9 April 2010 21:38 (fifteen years ago)

obama seems uncomfortably pissed at having to answer that question, btw

goole, Friday, 9 April 2010 21:40 (fifteen years ago)

as he should be.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 21:41 (fifteen years ago)

"we"--do we suddenly have a say in the process? where do i fill out my ballot?

The ILE block is very important to the liberal caucus.

Thanks, Que. I'll do my best to remain an impartial interpreter of the law.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

yeah.

we're dealing with the fate of planet, do you really care what this woman has to say about it? tee hee, run off to your friends steve...

xp

goole, Friday, 9 April 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

steve? george, i should say. ha.

goole, Friday, 9 April 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

new dem nominee will not get elected in that district, i think.

Yeah, when a guy says he 'wants to spend more time w/his family', I think it's safe to say that, barring a hidden scandal, he no longer thinks he can win in that district.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 9 April 2010 21:45 (fifteen years ago)

also, stupak and his family have received death-threats after his HCR vote.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 9 April 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

Dems are awesome. During the Bush years the GOP barely held a majority in the Senate yet it confirmed Roberts and Alito. The Dems have a 19-seat majority and they want to make Jeff Sessions and Orrin Hatch happy.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

we're dealing with the fate of planet, do you really care what this woman has to say about it?

However, goole, she's echoing the Repubs talking points on this, no matter how silly they may be or how much someone like Reagan might have understood what Obama's doing. If you look at all sorts of comments sections on this, wingnuts are saying it's weakening our defense, etc... By trotting out the SOD and the Joint Chiefs and pointing to her lack of experience in the field, he's making a comparison that the Republicans are starting to whine about (Can't speak w/o teleprompter, etc., over-uses the trappings of Presidential power, etc...); he's a level headed executive taking the advice of the best and the brightest and they (the wingnuts) are not.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 9 April 2010 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

re: Palin & psychologies & sociopathic types, pretty much everything she's done seems to me as ranking really high on the SDO scale

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_dominance_orientation

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Friday, 9 April 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

I am from Stupak's district, and any Repub who gets elected from there is gonna be 10x worse. Bart did some very good things for the people there, his abortion craziness aside.

he takes the account of everything in the universe into consideration (dan m), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:04 (fifteen years ago)

You're from Traverse City? I'm from Flint.

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

I'm from Houghton.

he takes the account of everything in the universe into consideration (dan m), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:07 (fifteen years ago)

(not Houghton Lake)

he takes the account of everything in the universe into consideration (dan m), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:07 (fifteen years ago)

Dems are awesome. During the Bush years the GOP barely held a majority in the Senate yet it confirmed Roberts and Alito. The Dems have a 19-seat majority and they want to make Jeff Sessions and Orrin Hatch happy.

― Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, April 9, 2010 9:50 PM (16 minutes ago) Bookmark

Ruth Bader Ginsburg was confirmed 96-3.

It's kabuki theater that always ends with the President getting his nominee through unless they fall on their face in the hearings.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 April 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)

Oooo sorry to hear that.

xp

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)

Harriet Meiers didn't even make it to the hearings iirc

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:10 (fifteen years ago)

Oooo sorry to hear that.

...says the guy from Flint? ;)

UP politics are strange. Bart got elected mostly on the basis of his record as a state trooper iirc. He had some great legislative successes like protecting the Great Lakes from all types of big business fuckery, including sending water to the Southwest for golf course irrigation and shit like that. His role as a Catholic-illumiati-Family craziod makes me sad, but I can't deny that I do have some affection for the guy. It's too bad he's going out like this.

he takes the account of everything in the universe into consideration (dan m), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:13 (fifteen years ago)

Harriet Meiers didn't even make it to the hearings iirc

― Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, April 9, 2010 10:10 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark

yeah well, that was a unique thing. The president picking a nominee so bad that his own base begs him to pull the nomination.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 April 2010 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

It's time to "stop ignoring" the National Petroleum Reserve Alaska and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Palin said, even if a caribou has to "take one for the team."

I... um... what

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)

pretty sure caribou are not on the fossil fuel burning "team"

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:21 (fifteen years ago)

She's talking about caribou doing ass2ass porn on the internet to raise funds, right?

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:22 (fifteen years ago)

Also, re: Stupak's history. Michael Moore's recent column on him really pointed that out, and that he had a history of doing good things whilst in office...except for this one little thing...

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:23 (fifteen years ago)

More Kagan fun.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:25 (fifteen years ago)

Why, if the reserves are really that small by global standards, are the Republicans so eager to rush to despoil areas of national beauty but so hesitant to do anything that would actually, you know, solve our energy problems and dependence on foreign oil?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:29 (fifteen years ago)

Also, re: Stupak's history. Michael Moore's recent column on him really pointed that out, and that he had a history of doing good things whilst in office...except for this one little thing...

^^^I know, right? That's what makes it so fucked up to me. He was basically a nobody for like 18 years, then all of a sudden he's so bad and hated. He had never really taken much of a stand on abortion before this year. I don't agree with his stance but most people in his district do, there's not really any getting around it.

I'm afraid that the remnants of old school miner unionism/Eastern-European immigrant liberalism that put him (and most other UP Dems) in office in the first place is dying out with the older people. The young nu-Repubs up there are some mark-ass hick rubes.

he takes the account of everything in the universe into consideration (dan m), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:31 (fifteen years ago)

He had never really taken much of a stand on abortion before this year.

ok obv not true, but he had never risen to the level he did this year

he takes the account of everything in the universe into consideration (dan m), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:32 (fifteen years ago)

wait, this woman is a lesbian...?

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:32 (fifteen years ago)

(ref'ing to Kagan there sorry)

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:33 (fifteen years ago)

cuz if so, many potential lolz w/Scalia

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:33 (fifteen years ago)

she's not an out lesbian. i think being successful and unattached tends to that kind of speculation. and, well, looking like this...

http://blog.heritage.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/elena_kagan090218.jpg

INSANE CLOWN POSSE IS THE ONLY HOPE FOR THE FUTURE OF MUSIC (tipsy mothra), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:35 (fifteen years ago)

it's really interesting that she was confirmed as solicitor general, considering how many nominees have stalled, and how she was obviously a potential SC nominee.

Eager to see how someone could rationalize the SG vote while voting no for the SC.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 April 2010 22:37 (fifteen years ago)

towleroad on her gay cred...

INSANE CLOWN POSSE IS THE ONLY HOPE FOR THE FUTURE OF MUSIC (tipsy mothra), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:37 (fifteen years ago)

Well, as per the quotes in that story to which I linked, GOP attacks on Kagan would be minimal.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:39 (fifteen years ago)

so all we need to do to get a closeted gay justice is nominate one who believes in random detention and wiretapping. fair trade?

INSANE CLOWN POSSE IS THE ONLY HOPE FOR THE FUTURE OF MUSIC (tipsy mothra), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:43 (fifteen years ago)

It's evolution, baby.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:44 (fifteen years ago)

Besides, gays are often closet fascists.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 April 2010 22:45 (fifteen years ago)

NO imo. i'd like to see another (unmarried) woman on the court but ugh

harbl, Friday, 9 April 2010 22:45 (fifteen years ago)

kathleen sullivan: officially hot.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 9 April 2010 22:47 (fifteen years ago)

i'd like to see another (unmarried) woman on the court

justice harbl

velko, Friday, 9 April 2010 22:51 (fifteen years ago)

lol. someday.

harbl, Friday, 9 April 2010 22:51 (fifteen years ago)

glad you guys think Bam is also AWESOME cuz he knows Palin is a dumbshit

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 10 April 2010 00:54 (fifteen years ago)

http://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l0m7rcJRQ21qbauyyo1_500.jpg

http://teapartyjesus.tumblr.com/

you're welcome

k3vin k., Saturday, 10 April 2010 03:42 (fifteen years ago)

Why, if the reserves are really that small by global standards, are the Republicans so eager to rush to despoil areas of national beauty but so hesitant to do anything that would actually, you know, solve our energy problems and dependence on foreign oil?

it's about control and fuckin' with the hippies. These guys are emotionally stunted, remember, and they're all about doing things to "send a message". ANWR wouldn't do jack shit to change anything but opening it up for drilling would both piss off the Dirty Fucking Hippies(and them treehuggin' faggit libruls) which are policy aims for these people, as well as proving that they can drill anywhere, anytime they want and ain't no stupid regulations getting in their way.

It also plays into the thickheaded mindset that only sees that most simplistic of value; that what you can sell it for. If you can't make a buck off it, what good is it?

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Saturday, 10 April 2010 04:41 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.newleftreview.org/?page=article&view=2821

goole, Saturday, 10 April 2010 06:29 (fifteen years ago)

Why, if the reserves are really that small by global standards, are the Republicans so eager to rush to despoil areas of national beauty but so hesitant to do anything that would actually, you know, solve our energy problems and dependence on foreign oil?

This applies to almost every politician in Washington, of course, but a lot of it comes down to $$:

http://i41.tinypic.com/ixh449.jpg

There's a lot of $$ invested in the status quo.

biologically wrong (Z S), Saturday, 10 April 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

Also, since good ol' Ron Reagan decided to gut alternative energy funding as soon as he took office, maybe Republicans are afraid to contradict their great leader.

Reagan is a key reason we have only about one-sixth of the soaring global market for windpower — an industry we once dominated: “President Reagan cut the renewable energy R&D budget 85% after he took office and eliminated the wind investment tax credit in 1986. This was pretty much the death of most of the US wind industry”.

Reagan gutted Carter’s entire multi-billion dollar clean energy and energy efficiency effort. He opposed and then rolled back fuel economy standards. Reagan turned all such commonsense strategies into “liberal” policies that must be opposed by any true conservative, a position embraced all too consistently by conservative leaders from Gingrich to Bush/Cheney and now to John McCain.

biologically wrong (Z S), Saturday, 10 April 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

Why are E&H and AE separated down the bottom? Because actually they're doing pretty well compared to Wall St. I suspect that numbers of lobbyists is a very poor way to gauge political clout.

Almost born for trouble (dowd), Saturday, 10 April 2010 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

There's a lot of $$ invested in the status quo

I'll say, 4x the amount of Wall Street!!

Adam Bruneau, Saturday, 10 April 2010 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

E&H and AE are separated at the bottom because it's a chart comparing the number of lobbyists pushing for the status quo vs. the number pushing for clean energy and energy efficiency.

I think that it's essential to look at the amount of money & lobbyists influencing politicians and policymakers - it's one of the most distorting features of our democracy. But maybe politicians have turned the page and no longer pay attention to lobbyists? I...don't think so.

biologically wrong (Z S), Saturday, 10 April 2010 16:45 (fifteen years ago)

Also, I think you guys are totally misreading the chart. It's not saying there are 159 Wall Street lobbyists in total. It's saying there are 159 Wall Street CLIMATE lobbyists. The chart comes from here: http://motherjones.com/environment/2009/11/agents-climate-change

biologically wrong (Z S), Saturday, 10 April 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

Another new player is the finance industry, which had virtually no lobbyists on global warming in 2003. This year, banks like Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase, as well as insurance companies and private equity firms, have 159 representatives working on the issue.

biologically wrong (Z S), Saturday, 10 April 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

Oh, OK - I wasn't doubting you, I just didn't understand the chart.

Almost born for trouble (dowd), Saturday, 10 April 2010 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

Ha, it's ok. It's probably kind of a misleading chart without that clarification, sorry!

The other thing about politicians going for short-term "solutions" (offshore drilling, ANWR) is that they're just playing to whims of their constituents. Beyond the good chunk of Americans who view investment in clean energy as some sort of sacrifice to the Great Global Warming Hoax (ignoring the important fact that there are a million of reasons to move as quickly as possible to clean energy that have nothing to do with climate change), there's also the inherent short-term bias in human thinking, and in our political system. Politicians must constantly worry about the next election, and people have trouble investing now in order to avoid something that they believe won't affect them for another hundred years (ignoring the consequences of climate change that are actually already happening). You'd think that they would at least want to switch to clean renewable energy so that electricity prices would be relatively stable in the future, rather than being subject to supply and demand, but...no.

biologically wrong (Z S), Saturday, 10 April 2010 17:15 (fifteen years ago)

and yes, I realize that supply and demand also affects the prices of renewable energy, particularly as it's ramping up now and given our lack of sufficient transmission infrastructure, I'm just saying that the laws of supply and demand are more punishing with finite fossil fuel reserves - oil, coal, natural gas - than with the wind and the sun, which should last us another 5 billion years or so.

biologically wrong (Z S), Saturday, 10 April 2010 17:17 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/10/us/politics/10memo.html?ref=politics

Ms. Palin offered a gift to those in the audience: Two sticks of teriyaki caribou meat jerky were left on the chairs for every delegate with a note, “An Alaskan Snack from SarahPAC.”

But it was Mr. Gingrich who made the most dramatic entrance. He strode into the darkened ballroom to the Survivor tune “Eye of the Tiger.” For several minutes, he shook hands and waved to admirers as nearly every verse from the “Rocky III” ballad played over the loudspeakers.

are we human or are we dancer (m coleman), Saturday, 10 April 2010 17:38 (fifteen years ago)

oh god i would love gingrich to try running in 2012

max, Saturday, 10 April 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

"Eye of the Tiger" is one of my favorite ballads.

President Keyes, Saturday, 10 April 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

Santorum live on C-Span y'all.

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 10 April 2010 17:53 (fifteen years ago)

Awesome sounding gift. I'd go to a rally just for free jerky, I think.

Almost born for trouble (dowd), Saturday, 10 April 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

oh man, mike pence.

"My favorite introduction is this. I'm a Christian, a Conservative, and a Republican. In that order."

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 10 April 2010 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

Santorum live on C-Span y'all.

The powerless politician or the substance?

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 10 April 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

Newt 2012, Hangin' tough, stayin' hungry!

Adam Bruneau, Saturday, 10 April 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

whoa huge long applause break for "AMERICA STANDS WITH ISRAEL," which then morphs into a USA chant.

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 10 April 2010 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

I would forget about haley barbour running for president. He can't deliver punchy one liners.

He did get introduced with an awesome video for the republican governor's association that featured the Miracle on Ice.

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 10 April 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

its hellllla early to make predictions but i think romneys the only one who has a shot

max, Saturday, 10 April 2010 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

I don't see how mitt can get past his massachusetts health reform record. He's going to be spending 90% of his campaign explaining why the health care reform bill is different from the massachusetts plan.

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 10 April 2010 19:19 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, i think the health care furor will die down a little after the GOP wins big in november and realizes that they cant actually repeal it. mitt will look dumb, sure, but not in a way that would sink him in a nat'l race. maybe it will prevent him from winning the primary.

max, Saturday, 10 April 2010 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

Really guys, don't tempt fate. Anything can happen in 2 years. A-ny-thing.

Perrin tweet:

Could we please have Coal Mining with the Stars?

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 10 April 2010 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

whoa huge long applause break for "AMERICA STANDS WITH ISRAEL," which then morphs into a USA chant.

― Matt Armstrong, Saturday, April 10, 2010 2:35 PM (1 hour ago)

...

k3vin k., Saturday, 10 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

ha dave weigel has something on the "USA" chant. it's ron paul's fault!

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/04/a_spat_over_standing_with_isra.html


A spat over 'standing with Israel'

NEW ORLEANS -- Supporters of Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.), who've been moving into the conference today to hear their man speak, have made their presence known with noisy shouts of disapproval when SRLC speakers deliver more bellicose rhetoric. During a speech by Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.), the division was obvious.

"Let the world know this if it knows nothing else," said Pence. "America stands with Israel!"

As most of the crowd rose for a standing ovation, the cluster of Paul fans -- most gathered stage left -- started booing, turning heads in the media section and in the rest of the room. Other SLRC delegates angrily turned on them, chanting (with an irony that amused the Paul fans) "USA! USA!" until they piped down.

goole, Saturday, 10 April 2010 19:58 (fifteen years ago)

The corner flagged a post on a liberal blog suggesting Cory Booker as a possible Scotus nominee.

Doesn't that sound pretty awesome?

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 10 April 2010 22:45 (fifteen years ago)

goole that sort of makes it sound like an ECW bout at the Elk's Lodge

Tracer Hand, Saturday, 10 April 2010 23:04 (fifteen years ago)

Let the world know this if it knows nothing else," said Pence, bashing a folding chair into his own head, "America stands with Israel!"

goole, Saturday, 10 April 2010 23:07 (fifteen years ago)

lmbo

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/04/romney-wins-srlc-straw-poll-by-one-vote.php

http://www.w-r-s.com/blog/2010/04/10/srlc-2012-presidential-straw-poll-results/

Initial Choice
(If the primary election for president were held today, for whom would you vote?)
Newt Gingrich 18% (321)
Mike Huckabee 4% (80)
Gary Johnson 1% (3)
Sarah Palin 18% (330)
Ron Paul 24% (438)
Tim Pawlenty 3% (54)
Mike Pence 3% (58)
Mitt Romney 24% (439)
Rick Santorum 2% (41)

Second Choice
(Who would be your second choice in the Republican Primary Election for president?)
Newt Gingrich 20% (339)
Mike Huckabee 11% (178)
Gary Johnson 6% (104)
Sarah Palin 20% (332)
Ron Paul 6% (98)
Tim Pawlenty 7% (114)
Mike Pence 8% (141)
Mitt Romney 14% (242)
Rick Santorum 7% (125)

goole, Saturday, 10 April 2010 23:43 (fifteen years ago)

lol

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Sunday, 11 April 2010 00:00 (fifteen years ago)

gunna be a long two years

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Sunday, 11 April 2010 00:19 (fifteen years ago)

any good articles about the nomination hunt? Growing concerned that Kagan is a terrible nominee...

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 11 April 2010 05:54 (fifteen years ago)

should be another thread about that imo, i can't follow this one

harbl, Sunday, 11 April 2010 13:18 (fifteen years ago)

on Newt's attacks on Obama for being "secular"

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Sunday, 11 April 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

This stuff all depresses me. The fact that Newt get so much media time and the only criticism of him comes from blogs. Then these 2 things:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/10/AR2010041001268.html?nav%3Dhcmodule&sub=AR

Virginia's confederate governor is now making it more difficult for non-criminal felons to get back their voting rights

Franck Rich talks in the NY Times about how Geitner is still consulting with Robert Rubin who denies responsibility for the Clinton signed, Republican push economic deregulations

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/11/opinion/11rich.html

curmudgeon, Sunday, 11 April 2010 22:42 (fifteen years ago)

West Virginians stick it to Westboro Baptist jacktards who came to shit on the memory of dead coal miners:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoZK0IvE-Z8&feature=player_embedded

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 12 April 2010 00:04 (fifteen years ago)

lol @ GOD HATES *WVU logo*

am0n corner (J0rdan S.), Monday, 12 April 2010 00:08 (fifteen years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8614695.stm

guys is this fearmongering or what

forgive me fada (acoleuthic), Monday, 12 April 2010 00:12 (fifteen years ago)

*rolls eyes* @ protest/counterprotest

k3vin k., Monday, 12 April 2010 01:09 (fifteen years ago)

feel hella bad for the WBC kids though

k3vin k., Monday, 12 April 2010 01:09 (fifteen years ago)

I skimmed over k3vin's last post and was all o_O before I realized he was talking about the poor kids dragged into that shit.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 12 April 2010 03:41 (fifteen years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8614695.stm

guys is this fearmongering or what

― forgive me fada (acoleuthic), Monday, 12 April 2010 00:12 (4 hours ago)

I don't see why it's fearmongering. There's a lot of nukes out there, and not all of them are well-guarded.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 12 April 2010 05:09 (fifteen years ago)

constitution should be amended so that nobody ever is allowed to chant "hey hey, ho ho, [ person/organization/ideological position x] has got to go" ever ever ever again

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 12 April 2010 06:35 (fifteen years ago)

or "what do we want? peace! when do we want it? now!"

deejus, get off the whiney weingarten penis, before i sb and bust (J0rdan S.), Monday, 12 April 2010 06:38 (fifteen years ago)

I'm _______________ and I'm here to say I love ____________ in a major way!

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 12 April 2010 06:48 (fifteen years ago)

did you guys hear about this aggie? on a forum he claimed "i just laid off my first obama-voting employee today" and was generally congratulated. then the press got ahold of it.

and then this..

http://texags.com/main/forum.reply.asp?topic_id=1609334&forum_id=16

Tracer Hand, Monday, 12 April 2010 09:45 (fifteen years ago)

"it was just a troll"

President Keyes, Monday, 12 April 2010 13:39 (fifteen years ago)

soooo classic

"my entire pathetic thread of increasingly feeble and arrogant arguments was in fact an elaborate performance prank! ha HA!"

Tracer Hand, Monday, 12 April 2010 13:41 (fifteen years ago)

I wonder if someone's tried to track down the employee involved (if he or she exists, that is).

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Monday, 12 April 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)

Tea Party candidate for governor of NY has a little bit of an email problem: http://wnymedia.net/paladino/

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 12 April 2010 14:57 (fifteen years ago)

nsfw btw

caek, Monday, 12 April 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

woah

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)

oh, new york, what are we going to do with you??

goole, Monday, 12 April 2010 15:09 (fifteen years ago)

nys is the worst state and I demand a re-poll

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:16 (fifteen years ago)

wowowoeow

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:21 (fifteen years ago)

Is anyone actually surprised by this or are we all just reacting to seeing something gross?

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:24 (fifteen years ago)

i guess i'm actually kinda surprised tbh

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

Although many of the emails included anti-Obama birther claims, and others were just pictures of naked women

Birtherism = worse than porn.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 12 April 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

This is exactly what being a Tea Party person is all about. Everyone who is identifying with that movement is either exactly like this dude, a willfully unaware moron, or some combination of the two.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

How is this not already all over the news?

Mordy, Monday, 12 April 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

1. He wasn't going to win anyway.
2. No one who pays attention to these people is surprised by this.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

er, for #2 that should be read as being in the context of ppl who publish news stories

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

Still, you'd think at least Wonkette would pick it up.

Mordy, Monday, 12 April 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

And Mike Huckabee jumps on the gay-hating express. Must definitely be running in '12. Does he even realize that gay couples sometimes have, like, natural children from one or both partners? And that those kids turn out just fine?

Presidential hopeful and former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee (R), in an interview with a college magazine, said the country shouldn't "experiment" by allowing gay couples to adopt children.

"I think this is not about trying to create statements for people who want to change the basic fundamental definitions of family," Huckabee told The Perspective, a magazine at The College New Jersey. "And always we should act in the best interest of the children, not in the seeming interest of the adults."

"Children are not puppies," he said. "This is not a time to see if we can experiment and find out, how does this work?"

Huckabee also compared gay marriage to drug use, incest and polygamy.

"You don't go ahead and accommodate every behavioral pattern that is against the ideal," he said. "That would be like saying, well, there are a lot of people who like to use drugs, so let's go ahead and accommodate those who want who use drugs. There are some people who believe in incest, so we should accommodate them. There are people who believe in polygamy, so we should accommodate them."

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)

Married heterosexual couples attending tea party rallies should not experiment with contaminating their children with hate.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)

he is so incredibly hateable. i'd like to to experiment and see how many kids raised by gay couples torture and kill animals

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

"That would be like saying, well, there are a lot of people who like to use drugs, so let's go ahead and accommodate those who want who use drugs."

Mordy, Monday, 12 April 2010 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

I believe in incest. I REALLY BELIEVE IN IT! Incest is my nu-jesus.

Jack Human (kenan), Monday, 12 April 2010 15:58 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, I don't know how much of a 2012 play that is - - that line plays to the base but in this century I don't think a strong majority of Americans are down with "gay people are the same as incestuous polygamous drug addicts."

Doctor Casino, Monday, 12 April 2010 15:58 (fifteen years ago)

"This is not a time to see if we can experiment and find out, how does this work?"

Anytime ANYONE, gay or straight, has a child for the first time, there's a hell of a lot of finding out "how does this work." And, newsflash for Huckabee, straight parents often screw it up a lot. (See children of Westboro parents upthread.)

I turn it up when I hear the banjo (Dan Peterson), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think a strong majority of Americans are down with "gay people are the same as incestuous polygamous drug addicts."

All jokes aside, I think you're wrong about that. It's all about phrasing at this point. "Gay" occupies this moral DMZ in the majority of American's minds, but don't prod them with any pretty rhetoric, or they'll hate gay people as sure as dog owners will hate cats.

Jack Human (kenan), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:08 (fifteen years ago)

Before I came out, my parents were all like, "I'm cool with gays, I just don't want them shoving `it' in my face." Now we don't discuss gays at all. Progress!

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

while were talking about racist tea partiers

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/04/new-data-on-tea-party-sympathizers.html

max, Monday, 12 April 2010 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

when people complain about gay ppl "shoving it in their faces" do they actually know what it sounds like they're saying

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:12 (fifteen years ago)

they're tryin to ram their gay agenda down our throats

Tracer Hand, Monday, 12 April 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

nah. (xp to kenan)

i know there are plenty of ppl with strong, negative feelings about gays, but most really don't lump them in with incestuous polygamous drug addicts.

then again i saw some really horrible graffiti in the bathroom today about "bullets for fags" so maybe i'm being too optimistic

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

"I'm cool with gays, I just don't want them shoving `it' in my face."

I think most people can agree w/ this

(xp)

iatee, Monday, 12 April 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

they are literally trying to butt-fuck this country

Tracer Hand, Monday, 12 April 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

"I'm cool with gays, I just don't want them shoving `it' in my face."

I think most people can agree w/ this

Yeah I hate having rainbows and Lady Gaga shoved in my face

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

gbx, I hope you mean a bathroom in a school building and not the bathroom in your apt

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

haha, yes, @ the univ

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

the homophobia is coming from inside the house!

Tracer Hand, Monday, 12 April 2010 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

"I totally blacked out, and when I woke up, I apparently hated gay people."

Jack Human (kenan), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

Sen. Chris Buttars believes gays and lesbians are "the greatest threat to America going down"

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

said Sessions. “If we have a nominee that evidences a philosophy of judges know best, ... then we are going to have a big fight about that because the American people don’t want that.”

wtf does this even mean. So we want a judge who DOESN'T think "judges know best"? Even though legal precedent is by definition established by judges?

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

I think most people can agree w/ this

Do you make faces at or insult straight couples when they're holding hands too?

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

Then there's Michael Ledeen;

Victor says there is neither rhyme nor reason to our foreign policy. Obama has no idea what he is doing and wings his way from one embarrassment to another, he says. Victor lists the embarrassments: dissing the Brits; pulling the carpet out from beneath the feet of the Czechs and Poles; rewriting Islamic history to make them look good; kissing up to the Russians and Saudis while insulting Karzai; and so forth.

But what if Obama does know what he’s doing? What if Victor has it right when he says that we are being transformed into a much larger version of the E.U.? (Actually, it’s a somewhat smaller version, but no matter.)

Obama sure rhymes, even if we find it unreasonable. He is not an admirer of America. He believes that America’s past behavior is the root cause of the world’s problems, and he wants to bring America under control by making it just another European country: impotent in world affairs (except for spreading the wealth) and stripped of its traditional exceptionalism at home.

That’s what his latest initiatives are all about, the new nuclear policy and the removal of clarity from our national-security doctrine by banning words like “jihad” and “Islam.” Since he considers us the problem, he imposes a nuclear doctrine that reigns in America — the root cause of evil in the world. And since he wants to turn America into a weak country that will accept the political correctness of the feckless “international community,” he adjusts our language to bring it into line with the U.N.’s version of Newspeak.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

When these assholes die off I think it's practically guaranteed the next generation will treat gay civil rights with respect.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 12 April 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

ledeen is so unhinged.. jesus

Tracer Hand, Monday, 12 April 2010 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

adam i used to think that way about racism but i don't think it works like that

Tracer Hand, Monday, 12 April 2010 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

racism is different

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_04/023298.php

Simply put, President Obama is disadvantaging the United States one step at a time and undermining this country's national defense on purpose.

--Rep. John Fleming (R-LA)

max, Monday, 12 April 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

All these GOPers saying they want Obama to be more like Reagan RE: nukes. Obama is being EXACTLY like Reagan. Look back at RR's speeches. I mean, I know that means trusting in historical facts rather than readymade narrative, but christ.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 12 April 2010 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

"one step at a time"

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

Well, no, Reagan's rhetoric was pretty bellicose his first term. There was also the matter of putting Pershing missiles on West German soil.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

Reagan said he hoped one day we would completely eliminate nukes. Did that make him a traitor? No - because he played a cowboy in a b-movie 40 years earlier!

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 12 April 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

Reagan also said he didn't believe in feminism because women were superior to men anyway.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

Reagan said things. It's true.

Jack Human (kenan), Monday, 12 April 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

Love that clip in Capitalism: A Love Story where Reagan's giving the speech at Wall Street and the CEO of Merril Lynch tells him to "hurry it up", and Ronald just looks like he snapped out of a daze. Really shows you who was in charge there.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 12 April 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

Jokes aside, though, Adam's right. Reagan did defy the military-industrial establishment, his own advisors, and the Beltway villagers in his second term, as this excellent book makes clear.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 April 2010 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

Love that clip in Capitalism: A Love Story where Reagan's giving the speech at Wall Street and the CEO of Merril Lynch tells him to "hurry it up", and Ronald just looks like he snapped out of a daze. Really shows you who was in charge there.

lol! so great. that was Don Regan (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Regan), but the point stands.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Monday, 12 April 2010 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

who was CEO of Merril Lynch. don't mind me.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Monday, 12 April 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)

xxp

From Amazon: Reagan, however, in Mann's view, believed that the Cold War rested less on the weight of armies and weapons than on the struggle of ideas and political values.

Did he? And if he did, did it matter? How does the price of oil figure into this? I think that had more to do with the fall of the Soviet Union than any other single factor.

Jack Human (kenan), Monday, 12 April 2010 17:07 (fifteen years ago)

Hillary for SCOTUS!!! The smartest woman EVAH!!!!!!!!

http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2010/04/supreme-court-justice-hillary-clinton.html

Jesus saved fewer people than my Savior Obama will (Dandy Don Weiner), Monday, 12 April 2010 17:35 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.cnn.com/2010/SHOWBIZ/04/12/enquirer.tabloids.pulitzer/index.html?hpt=C1

guys, how do we campaign for a particular story to win a Pulitzer

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 17:38 (fifteen years ago)

Hillary would take a few years to get up to full speed on the court, but she'd be an excellent choice. There's something to be said for selecting SCOTUS justices with extensive political experience, as well as legal experience. At that level, it's not all about consulting and applying legal precedent, but settling on how to harmonize precedent and public policy (read: politics).

Aimless, Monday, 12 April 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)

will never happen

USC prof contending that Edwards might have won nomination except for Enquirer's baby-mama story is straight trolling

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 April 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

HRC's legal experience is meager at best and Obama would never be dumb enough to nominate her. Slick Willie would be a much better choice.

Jesus saved fewer people than my Savior Obama will (Dandy Don Weiner), Monday, 12 April 2010 17:47 (fifteen years ago)

law clerk hanky-panky

velko, Monday, 12 April 2010 17:51 (fifteen years ago)

HRC's legal experience is meager at best

^^ this.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 April 2010 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

This iteration of the Court needs more justices with legislative experiences, and I wouldn't mind Sebelius. I'm looking at the current crop of senators and governors for the next Hugo Black though.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 April 2010 18:19 (fifteen years ago)

I am tempted to start a thread for Harriet Miers because I googled her and hadn't realized she was directly tied into the whole "dismissal of US attorneys" scandal; also I had forgotten how much she looked like an SNL character as played by Jan Hooks.

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

re: the email stuff -- am I surprised that someone affiliating themself with the tea party movement is lol racist? not at all!

but i *am* surprised that anyone even remotely considering public office would forward racist & pornographic emails. surprised at the sheer stupidity of it, really.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 12 April 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

have we mentioned this one yet, or does it go into the NY State thread, about the teabagger GOP gov candidate spamming people with not-really-suprising emails?

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/04/tea_party_gov_candidates_racist_sexually_graphic_e.php

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Monday, 12 April 2010 18:47 (fifteen years ago)

did you like even look at the post immediately above yours

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 18:48 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha

when i tried to open the OG link way upthread it didn't open :-/

J0rdan S., Monday, 12 April 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

Caputo accused Democrats of wanting to change the subject from substantive issues to "having sex with horses."
Caputo accused Democrats of wanting to change the subject from substantive issues to "having sex with horses."
Caputo accused Democrats of wanting to change the subject from substantive issues to "having sex with horses."
Caputo accused Democrats of wanting to change the subject from substantive issues to "having sex with horses."
Caputo accused Democrats of wanting to change the subject from substantive issues to "having sex with horses."
Caputo accused Democrats of wanting to change the subject from substantive issues to "having sex with horses."
Caputo accused Democrats of wanting to change the subject from substantive issues to "having sex with horses."
Caputo accused Democrats of wanting to change the subject from substantive issues to "having sex with horses."
Caputo accused Democrats of wanting to change the subject from substantive issues to "having sex with horses."
Caputo accused Democrats of wanting to change the subject from substantive issues to "having sex with horses."

J0rdan S., Monday, 12 April 2010 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

altho one could argue that fucking horses is a substantive issue in some sense

J0rdan S., Monday, 12 April 2010 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

soo, is this guy a "tea party candidate" ie worthless, or is he a "tea party" candidate for the GOP nom?

goole, Monday, 12 April 2010 18:54 (fifteen years ago)

• A January 2010 email, containing a hardcore pornographic video entitled "Miss France 2008 F[***]ing."

what was the point of this one? aside from seeing miss france 2008 fucking

J0rdan S., Monday, 12 April 2010 18:55 (fifteen years ago)

soo, is this guy a "tea party candidate" ie worthless, or is he a "tea party" candidate for the GOP nom?

the former, which is why no one actually cares about this story

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 18:55 (fifteen years ago)

i don't even think that video is of Miss France 2008 (after doing some uh - research).

Mordy, Monday, 12 April 2010 18:56 (fifteen years ago)

truly a scandal

goole, Monday, 12 April 2010 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

yeah that is quite shocking, how miss france 2008 never fucked on camera

J0rdan S., Monday, 12 April 2010 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

I thought that was part of the Miss France competition (swimsuit, talent, on-camera fucking, interview)

Wood shavings! Laughing out loud! (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:00 (fifteen years ago)

Caché?

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:00 (fifteen years ago)

duh, never mind. i kant read good

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:01 (fifteen years ago)

this guy brings the LOLs

This is hardly the first time that the outspoken Paladino, 63, has courted controversy. He recently said that health-care reform "will kill more Americans through deteriorating health care than were lost on 9/11."

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 12 April 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)

Senator Hatch (R., Utah) went out of his way to praise SecState Hillary Clinton as a potential Supreme Court pick on the Today Show this morning:

"I happen to like Hillary Clinton, I think she's done agood job for the Democrats — Secretary of State's position," Hatch said, "and I have high respect for her, and think a great deal of her."

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:10 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/12/AR2010041202070.html

Nebraska lawmakers on Monday gave final approval to a first-of-its-kind measure requiring women to be screened for possible mental and physical problems before having abortions.

Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman said Thursday he supports the measure, meaning it is all but guaranteed to receive his signature and become law this summer. It's also likely be challenged in court. National abortion-rights supporters have called it a drastic shift in abortion policy that would block abortions by scaring doctors who might perform them.

Supporters say it simply puts abortions in line with other medical procedures in which patients are screened for possible problems.

"We're dealing with destruction of early, unborn life, so we ought to take extra care," said Greg Schleppenbach of the National Catholic Conference.

The measure is unusual, however, in spelling out what factors doctors must consider when doing the screenings. Schleppenbach said that's because doctors otherwise would turn to other abortion providers to set the standards for the medical community.

Yeah, how dare doctors keep their own counsel on setting medical standards instead of consulting the child rape community Catholic Church?

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

disgusting

goole, Monday, 12 April 2010 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

wtf

Bear Ana Gasteyer (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

I don't even have the words for how much that pisses me off

Twink Will Ferrell (J0hn D.), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

grrrrrrrr.

kate78, Monday, 12 April 2010 19:25 (fifteen years ago)

Another Republican who doesn't want government to stand in the way of you and your doctor?

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 12 April 2010 19:25 (fifteen years ago)

but dude, we're talking about early unborn life here so it's ok.

kate78, Monday, 12 April 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

ugh

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

revolting

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

Supporters say it simply puts abortions in line with other medical procedures in which patients are screened for possible problems.

maybe I'm just a bad med student or w/e but I can't think of ANY other medical procedure that the GOVT has mandated u be screened for

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:28 (fifteen years ago)

Nebraska lawmakers on Monday gave final approval to a first-of-its-kind measure requiring women to be screened for possible mental and physical problems before having abortions children.

I turn it up when I hear the banjo (Dan Peterson), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

legislation I can get behind!

kate78, Monday, 12 April 2010 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

also: which medical professionals did they consult when deciding the screening process? shame on any representative medical org that willingly participated.

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

maybe I'm just a bad med student or w/e but I can't think of ANY other medical procedure that the GOVT has mandated u be screened for

gender reassignment?

Bear Ana Gasteyer (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

My first thought was "voluntary amputation" but either way it's still wrong-O moose and enormously offensive.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

counseling and a specific consent form is required for HIV testing.

kate78, Monday, 12 April 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

define "counseling" here because AFAIK you need to give consent but don't need any counseling whatsoever to have an HIV test in MA

Bear Ana Gasteyer (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:39 (fifteen years ago)

counseling and a specific consent form is required for HIV testing.

this is probably gonna change, at least accordig to the lecture I had today: opt-out screening v opt-in

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:40 (fifteen years ago)

somebody talks to you, explains consent. I think the regulation's intent is to identify risk factors and ways to reduce them and ways to reduce them, but in reality, most providers just go, "sign here."

kate78, Monday, 12 April 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

Counseling and a specific consent form should be required to join the modern GOP.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

also almost 100% sure gender reassignment doesn't require (legally) counseling and screening. it's medically recommended (and mal prac law probably "requires" it, by precedent), but I highly doubt it's on the books somewhere

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

and tbh honest I'm kinda shocked HIV screening would legally require it. way to reinforce stigma

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV_test#Principles

oic, counseling for ppl who test positive (which is very different from counseling before you ever even take the test)

Bear Ana Gasteyer (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

i think most gender reassignment doctors require patients to live as their desired sex for a whole year before the operation even happens, as well as attending counseling -- it's a unique situation that can't really be replicated

J0rdan S., Monday, 12 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

ugh. i just -- can someone hazard a guess as to what sort of mental or physical conditions they would be screening "for"? wtf.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

Liberalism.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

feminine hysteria, of course

Nhex, Monday, 12 April 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

wait, is the implication that the screening is to make sure a woman HAS some kind of mental or physical problem before going through with it??

"well honey, you're healthy and sane. you really ought to have that kid, no sale."

goole, Monday, 12 April 2010 19:50 (fifteen years ago)

if a pregnant woman seeking an abortion was diagnosed to have a severe mental illness, then what -- that information would be used to *prevent* her from getting an abortion? or what?

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

you'd think they be into eugenics!

kate78, Monday, 12 April 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

xp That distinction left conveniently vague!

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:53 (fifteen years ago)

i think most gender reassignment doctors require patients to live as their desired sex for a whole year before the operation even happens, as well as attending counseling -- it's a unique situation that can't really be replicated

key word: "doctors"

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 19:58 (fifteen years ago)

Women are already screened, although not in a legally sanctioned fashion, if they want any kind of permanent birth control. If you want your tubes tied before you have put forth your spawn, you're in for a battery of sideways, suspicious glances at best, and more likely a flat "no".

Jack Human (kenan), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Mr. Que, Monday, 12 April 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

i guess by permanent birth control you mean IUD's?

Mr. Que, Monday, 12 April 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

wth are you talking about kenan

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

maybe he's talking about a philip k. dick novel he once read

Mr. Que, Monday, 12 April 2010 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

I'm talking about this:

Nebraska lawmakers on Monday gave final approval to a first-of-its-kind measure requiring women to be screened for possible mental and physical problems before having abortions.

Jack Human (kenan), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)

If you want your tubes tied before you have put forth your spawn, you're in for a battery of sideways, suspicious glances at best, and more likely a flat "no".

according to my wife, this is the treatment you can expect if you ask for a diaphragm

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

or an IUD, etc.

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

I'm pretty sure that if a young(ish), healthy woman who had never had kids before asked to get her tubes tied or something more permanent than, say, an annual implant, there would be ALL KINDS of resistance to her wishes.

xxxp yeah what they said.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

don't most women use the pill? what's the statistical use of diaphragms, like less than 10%?

Mr. Que, Monday, 12 April 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)

don't most women use the pill?

I don't know. But for some women the pill is either a really bad idea or completely impossible. And frankly, alternatives to getting pregnant shouldn't have to make most of your adult life totally suck.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

a worse idea than sticking a rubber disc up your vagina every time you wanna do it?

Mr. Que, Monday, 12 April 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

If the rubber disk doesn't give you blood clots, depression, mood swings, or flatline your sex drive, then YES.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

somehow I don't really have a hard time believing that regularly ingesting hormones can have more side-effects than using a diaphragm

Bear Ana Gasteyer (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

god now i'm gonna sound like i'm with ~them~ but dude: tube tying/abortion/fukkin any invasive or permanent procedure does require screening/consent, in that you have to assess someone's health/awareness before doing something that MIGHT make them worse off (and i don't mean reproductively). i'm not against it, per se, i'm just against the gov't mandating how that screening should work.

this, btw, is why health/medicine is such a bugbear for both the right and left, imo: they both want to invoke the sanctity of the doctor-patient relationship when its politically convenient, and elide it when it isn't. however, from where i'm standing, the left seems far more consistently deferential. that is: if i'm gonna cut someone/end their reproductive ability, i wanna make sure that they're pretty sure about it! i'm (maybe) going to be the guy doing it! however, i ~don't~ want to have to make my case to some govtmental authority when the patient and i agree that it's the right thing to do.

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

If the rubber disk doesn't give you blood clots, depression, mood swings, or flatline your sex drive, then YES.

This.

if i'm gonna cut someone/end their reproductive ability, i wanna make sure that they're pretty sure about it!

I personally was not harangued about what was easily as drastic a decision. When I said, "No babies ever," they just took my word for it.

Jack Human (kenan), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:46 (fifteen years ago)

Kenan and gbx are right - I have two friends who went for tubal ligation because they knew kids were not in their future. The doctors they saw did not try to dissuade them but did delineate any possible side-effects, including regret.

They should really make clear what the outcome of such an exam would be - not that it's OK in the 21st century BTW - in the days before abortion was legal the well-off (and some others, in less consensual situations, whether for being mental patient or not) could get psych waivers allowing a termination (example: Edie Sedgwick) but again this was in the days of doctor-patient confidentiality without insurers and intrusive (potential) employers cluttering shit up. Reckon this is one of those regressive ideas designed to give a vulnerable woman 'will this declaration of nutterness go down on my PERMANENT RECORD?' heebie-jeebies, inhibiting her path toward the clinic.

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:47 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, i'm aware of the side effects of the pill, just wondering out loud practicality/popularity re: diaphragm

Mr. Que, Monday, 12 April 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)

my wife and I have never used the pill FYI, it has a lot of fucked up side effects

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:51 (fifteen years ago)

We're not only talking about a diaphragm, though, are we? We're talking about any non-hormonal method of bc basically. IUDs have made a comeback, but when I asked for one about 4 years ago, no doctor at that practice would perform the procedure.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

I think doctors and patients should have discussions about any medical decisions just because I think conversations about your body in a safe place with your doctor are good things and are healthy. But I doubt there are many patient/doctor relationships today that aren't totally mired in broader craziness/dysfunction where the conversations would do more harm than good, and calling a conversation a "screening" is a good indication of this where having a discussion about choices becomes this thing where you're evaluated and judged, and obviously abortion shouldn't be a special case -- ie: it seems way more important to me that patients feel comfortable talking about even more personal medical decisions (like treatments to pursue and their consequences, the experiences of going through them). I'm very close with someone who is going through series chemo right now and on top of the horror of the experience I don't think they're exactly having a great experience navigating their medical/physical terrain with their doctor who is like, "we'll try this and if it doesn't work we'll try this and if that doesn't work we're out of options," and it's just super traumatic and horrifying on top of the normal physical trauma.

Mordy, Monday, 12 April 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

We're talking about any non-hormonal method of bc basically.

right, yes

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

serious*, not series, or rather a series of serious chemo. xp

Mordy, Monday, 12 April 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)

Doctors really want you to take the pill, in my experience. I just rejected the estrogen pill and the ring as options because of their side-effects, specifically requested a non-hormonal IUD, and when that procedure failed TWICE, the doctor suggested an annual HORMONAL implant.

Did you perhaps not hear ANYTHING I JUST SAID??

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)

Seriously, I was crying in the doctor's office (although that was also due to pain and nervousness about more pain), and I wasn't even trying to, say, get an abortion.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)

doctors are really into drugs fyi

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:58 (fifteen years ago)

personally i think everyone should get on board with my awesome plan for federally funded sperm banks and incentivized vasectomies

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Monday, 12 April 2010 20:58 (fifteen years ago)

an annual hormonal implant /= "the pill", laurel, c'mon

yes, it's hormones, but giving something once a YEAR is not the same as giving something once a day. it is obv still hormonal, but the sides might not be as extreme

(NB -- i have to brush up on this....obv you know more about what works for you than i do)

xp oh that sucks, i'm sorry :(

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:00 (fifteen years ago)

xp At the risk of endorsing some weird Heinlein free-love goofball reproductive culture, I'm with Will here. Female contraception is a horror show every time.

Jack Human (kenan), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)

yes, it's hormones, but giving something once a YEAR is not the same as giving something once a day. it is obv still hormonal, but the sides might not be as extreme

It releases a continuous dose. It might not have the intermittent spikes of a daily pill, but the hormonal effect is the same -- it still works by the same mechanism.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)

doctors are really into drugs fyi

sadly otm - cue krusty "they backed a truck full of money up to the house, I'm not made of stone"

the mom most likely to comprehend juggalos (J0hn D.), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)

;_; u guys

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)

My neighbour the mad scientist was on the rolls for the drug company pushers to come over and give him The Talk and mugs/pens/swag but he hated them and decided he'd apply the Visiting Jehovah's Witness method to them and find ways to waste three hours of their time, mostly through exaggerating his deafness and Britishness.

Laurel, I get that it's infuriating because let's face it, you are paying for the waste of time, and it's expensive. An informed patient should be able to get whatever is available. Was this a female doctor? Would generally rather see one of them because I feel a little bit judged w/male doctors and birth control - even when they're really not being like that, and regardless of who is bringing that to the table, getting the lady doc in is the way around that for me.

Oh Mordy, if chemo didn't suck enough as it is. ;_;

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)

My wife asked her doctor for a tubal ligation after we'd been married about 3 years, and received a flat out "No." She simply wouldn't do it. Whereas my doctor agreed to perform a vasectomy for me with no hesitation.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

xxxxxp

plenty of women take the pill without significant side effects. My girlfriend had side effects with the pill, so she switched to the nuva ring and didn't find any side effects with it. Y'all need to quit universalizing so much on this BC tip.

Everyone is different, but if you're going with the diaphragm, you're really rolling the dice with the fetus issue. Condoms are probably a better option statistically.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 12 April 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

Anyway this isn't my pity party. I'm older, I'm educated, I have ILX and teh internets to give me advice, I'm only trying to NOT have babies, and I'm still upset and pissed at the system right now. Things pretty much only get worse from there, the more advantages you take away.

This law is CLEARLY not about normal, ethical consideration for elective procedures, this is about restricting access. Purely.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:08 (fifteen years ago)

Matt, you shouldn't minimize how life-upending adverse reactions to hormones are, and I wonder what your definition of "significant side effects" is - weight gain's extremely common, so's adverse skin reactions, so's nausea; those may not be significant to you, but that's probably because none of these symptoms will ever happen to you since it's not your body

the mom most likely to comprehend juggalos (J0hn D.), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:10 (fifteen years ago)

My wife asked her doctor for a tubal ligation after we'd been married about 3 years, and received a flat out "No." She simply wouldn't do it. Whereas my doctor agreed to perform a vasectomy for me with no hesitation.

― Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, April 12, 2010 9:07 PM (32 seconds ago) Bookmark

Part of the reason that doctors are more comfortable with vasectomies than tubal ligations is that there are much lower health risks associated with vasectomies (it's also an easier surgery). The research on risks involved with tubal ligation is debatable though.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 12 April 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

Matt, you shouldn't minimize how life-upending adverse reactions to hormones are, and I wonder what your definition of "significant side effects" is - weight gain's extremely common, so's adverse skin reactions, so's nausea; those may not be significant to you, but that's probably because none of these symptoms will ever happen to you since it's not your body

― the mom most likely to comprehend juggalos (J0hn D.), Monday, April 12, 2010 9:10 PM (56 seconds ago) Bookmark

These side effects are not universal.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 12 April 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

This law is CLEARLY not about normal, ethical consideration for elective procedures, this is about restricting access. Purely.

Not that the elective procedures that are available are all that fantastic, but yeah. What she said.

Jack Human (kenan), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:12 (fifteen years ago)

xo

Like I said, the pill didn't work for my gf, the nuva ring did. For some women, neither is a good option.

A diaphragm is a pretty shitty option.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 12 April 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

haha I meant xp but I do love you guys.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 12 April 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

doctors are more comfortable with vasectomies than tubal ligations is that there are much lower health risks associated with vasectomies (it's also an easier surgery)

and more easily reversible iirc?

xp At the risk of endorsing some weird Heinlein free-love goofball reproductive culture, I'm with Will here. Female contraception is a horror show every time.

yep. i mean, i'm (only sort of) joking and i totally get the implications of having the govt involved to such a weird extent in its public's procreative endeavors. but still...

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:15 (fifteen years ago)

nothing wrong with a diaphragm & they make great hats for your hipster chihuahuas iirc!

the mom most likely to comprehend juggalos (J0hn D.), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:16 (fifteen years ago)

but still what xp

govt has no business in anyone's reproductive endeavors

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:16 (fifteen years ago)

doctors are more comfortable with vasectomies than tubal ligations is that there are much lower health risks associated with vasectomies (it's also an easier surgery)

and more easily reversible iirc?

Yeah, I think that MDs take a man's desire to not have children more seriously than a woman's. We are fickle and change our minds, like, all the time,

kate78, Monday, 12 April 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)

okay I am glad I am married and not chasing hipster girls who use chihuahua hats as contraceptives

Bear Ana Gasteyer (HI DERE), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:18 (fifteen years ago)

gbx, with all the shit that abortion doctors have to go through even now, do you think the bulk of them don't ask or care about their patients' mental health or sound judgment? Any reputable provider at this point is putting him- or herself and their staff and their families so much at risk, it makes me think you don't DO that unless you give a shit. And if you give a shit and someone came in sedated or seemed non-consenting or off her rocker or ANYTHING, NO ONE WOULD PERFORM THE ABORTION. At least this is how it seems to me.

This law is overstating a need for a safety mechanism that's already in place and covered under normal circumstances, just to scare women and to open a door for even more health providers to refuse or object, that's my strong gut feeling.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:18 (fifteen years ago)

laurel, I agree with you!

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:20 (fifteen years ago)

"Your mom and I would like to talk to you about something you left out on top of your dresser."
"You mean the hat I got for Frodo-dog? Isn't it the cutest?"

the mom most likely to comprehend juggalos (J0hn D.), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:20 (fifteen years ago)

This law is overstating a need for a safety mechanism that's already in place and covered under normal circumstances

this was my point!

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:20 (fifteen years ago)

Laurel, I've worked for quite a few abortion providers in quite a few states and it seems like this law is going to mandate what is already done. What's scary is how they might collect and use this information and what recommendations they may put forth (which, as noted upthread, they're being pretty vague about)...

kate78, Monday, 12 April 2010 21:21 (fifteen years ago)

govt has no business in anyone's reproductive endeavors

agreed. like i said though, vasectomies could merely be incentivized. like in NO WAY mandatory. i'm just thinking out loud abt the best way to adequately fund hueg massive sperm banks, etc...

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:21 (fifteen years ago)

Sorry, Ev! I must have mis-read somehow your insistence that you didn't want to sound like you were agreeing w the righties on anything.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:23 (fifteen years ago)

and more easily reversible iirc?

Unless you change your mind inside of three to six months, vasectomies are not reversible at all. In fact, your body will learn to see sperm as an intrusion, and will develop antibodies to attack sperm. Even if you reattach the vasa deferentia, you can't stop your body from killing the sperm. If you have a vasectomy, you have to assume that you're sterile forever.

Jack Human (kenan), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:24 (fifteen years ago)

^did not know that. so, sperm banks!!

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:25 (fifteen years ago)

n/p laurel

i was only agreeing that consent/screening is a) an important part of any consultation and b) that this is already something that happens. i emphatically disagree with the idea that there should be a law in place dictating how this should happen. moreover, we don't need a law saying it ~should~ happen, because tort law has already sorted that (cynically: we inform and get consent so ppl don't sue)

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:26 (fifteen years ago)

getting informed consent isn't a waiver of legal rights, btw

kate78, Monday, 12 April 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)

people still gonna sue

kate78, Monday, 12 April 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

only a matter of time

http://attackerman.firedoglake.com/2010/04/12/sarah-palin-is-a-juggalo/

goole, Monday, 12 April 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

getting informed consent isn't a waiver of legal rights, btw

― kate78, Monday, April 12, 2010 4:27 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

people still gonna sue

― kate78, Monday, April 12, 2010 4:28 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

uh, i know?

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:29 (fifteen years ago)

read: "cynically"

i am well aware of the fact that ppl still frivolously and legitimately sue even after being informed of risks/outcomes/whatever. again: the point was that the medical profession has (imo) holistically absorbed the idea of informed consent, and that it doesn't need to specifically legislated down to a procedural level. that caution and concern (and judgement) isn't doled out in the same helping to men seeking vasectomies as it is to women seeking tubal ligations is a problem, for sure, but one that i would hope is getting dealt with in time

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:33 (fifteen years ago)

On a less legal note, are you arguing that men without children who seek sterilization should be subject to the same scrutiny that women who seek the same are? I suppose that would level the field, as it were, but is that really anyone's business, even the doctor's? I'm asking honestly, without snark or malice. I acknowledge that it is a major life decision, but as such such, is it any of your doctor's business?

Jack Human (kenan), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:45 (fifteen years ago)

in that a doctor will be performing a surgical procedure, yes.

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

Well, of course a doctor takes on the responsibility for keeping you physically healthy. But is it part of his or her job to keep you happy? Because that seems to be the underlying assumption when a woman who seeks sterilization asks a doctor to perform the procedure. "I won't do this, because i know you'll be sorry later."

Jack Human (kenan), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

more like

"i won't do this unless you think about it because it is IRREVERSABLE"

Mr. Que, Monday, 12 April 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

SHIT I SPELLED THAT WRONG

Mr. Que, Monday, 12 April 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

But they don't ask men to think about it, not anywhere near as much.

Jack Human (kenan), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

and you have evidence of this

Mr. Que, Monday, 12 April 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

Of course I do.

This is going in circles.

Jack Human (kenan), Monday, 12 April 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

even the progressive docs I've worked with wouldn't perform a tubal if the pt didn't already have at least one kid.

kate78, Monday, 12 April 2010 21:55 (fifteen years ago)

fire, water, air and dirt
fuckin magnets - how do they work?

Tracer Hand, Monday, 12 April 2010 22:00 (fifteen years ago)

Matt, you shouldn't minimize how life-upending adverse reactions to hormones are, and I wonder what your definition of "significant side effects" is - weight gain's extremely common, so's adverse skin reactions, so's nausea; those may not be significant to you, but that's probably because none of these symptoms will ever happen to you since it's not your body

― the mom most likely to comprehend juggalos (J0hn D.)

no he was otm i really like the pill and get mad when ppl act like it's some kind of poison for everyone

harbl, Monday, 12 April 2010 22:04 (fifteen years ago)

ive never taken the pill

max, Monday, 12 April 2010 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

i dont think it would work for me tho

max, Monday, 12 April 2010 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

ok well at least you don't have an opinion on it, i'll give u that

harbl, Monday, 12 April 2010 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

the pill was a horror show for us -- wife is really really happy she's not taking it anymore and says she'll never go back

Mordy, Monday, 12 April 2010 22:08 (fifteen years ago)

i think its fair to say, that for some people, it works well with little or no complaint, and for others, the side effects are difficult

max, Monday, 12 April 2010 22:15 (fifteen years ago)

yeah my wife said it made her crazy. like, more crazy than normal.

also it was actually a female doctor and her staff that gave her a bunch of shit for asking for something else (i.e., IUD, diaphragm, tubal ligation, or anything non-hormonal related that wasn't a condom). Telling a doctor you don't want a drug always gets the o_0 from them

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 April 2010 22:17 (fifteen years ago)

it's the equivalent of telling them they don't know how to do their job, really

Shamandy Warhol (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 12 April 2010 22:17 (fifteen years ago)

I'm reasonably sure that birth control pills can contribute to breast cancer among other things. I think they're nasty business. but I understand why women would want to be on them because men are not very reliable on these things.

akm, Monday, 12 April 2010 23:28 (fifteen years ago)

This gon' end well:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100412/ap_on_re_us/us_tea_party_militia

Okla. tea parties and lawmakers envision militia

By SEAN MURPHY and TIM TALLEY, Associated Press Writers – 1 hr 55 mins ago

OKLAHOMA CITY – Frustrated by recent political setbacks, tea party leaders and some conservative members of the Oklahoma Legislature say they would like to create a new volunteer militia to help defend against what they believe are improper federal infringements on state sovereignty.

Tea party movement leaders say they've discussed the idea with several supportive lawmakers and hope to get legislation next year to recognize a new volunteer force. They say the unit would not resemble militia groups that have been raided for allegedly plotting attacks on law enforcement officers.

"Is it scary? It sure is," said tea party leader Al Gerhart of Oklahoma City, who heads an umbrella group of tea party factions called the Oklahoma Constitutional Alliance. "But when do the states stop rolling over for the federal government?"

What's the best way to beat the history of the phrase "state's rights" into some low-info voter's head? a heavy textbook?

Also, points to the republican state rep/ex-Army guy for actually saying something decent:

"If the intent is to create a militia for disaster relief, we have the National Guard," said Sen. Steve Russell, R-Oklahoma City, a retired Army lieutenant colonel. "Anything beyond that purpose should be viewed with great concern and caution."

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 01:14 (fifteen years ago)

ive never taken the pill

― max, Monday, April 12, 2010 4:06 PM (3 hours ago)

i dont think it would work for me tho

― max, Monday, April 12, 2010 4:06 PM (3 hours ago)

idk max I'm pretty sure that while you took it, you would not have any babies.

Ponies are horse children (Abbott), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 01:20 (fifteen years ago)

http://flimmr.passagen.se/movie/beavis_and_butthead_pregnant_pause.action

Jack Human (kenan), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 01:29 (fifteen years ago)

The most thorough argument against nominating Elena Kagan.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 12:36 (fifteen years ago)

f elena kagan

max, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 12:38 (fifteen years ago)

no thanks

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 12:42 (fifteen years ago)

Unless you change your mind inside of three to six months, vasectomies are not reversible at all.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasovasostomy

Bear Ana Gasteyer (HI DERE), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:02 (fifteen years ago)

Is that from one of Kagan's decisions?

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:03 (fifteen years ago)

It's from the landmark knife vs. yr nuts case.

Bear Ana Gasteyer (HI DERE), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:04 (fifteen years ago)

"I know `dickless' when I see it."

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:06 (fifteen years ago)

'three generations of imbeciles is enough'

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:12 (fifteen years ago)

yeah guyz don't mind me. i was just continuing a drunken convo my GF and i were having about how awful (for her) most female contraceptive choices tend to be. and then we made a joek about vasectomies for all - after storing yr boys at a federally funded facility, of course. then you and yr SO (if applicable) can decide to break them out and have babies however and whenever you like. but it's like an active decision, which i think is key.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 13:13 (fifteen years ago)

if it wasn't politically incorrect, i would buy you all vasectomies

Earning your Masters in Library and Information Science is beautiful (schlump), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)

Haven't read this yet but:
"What Sarah Palin forgets (or never knew) about Ronald Reagan"
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason/2010/04/12/reagan/index.html

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 14:16 (fifteen years ago)

xpost - Got mine 20 years ago this summer. Damn!

It's really nice not having to deal with hormone methods or desensitizing barriers.

millions now zinging will never lol (WmC), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 14:18 (fifteen years ago)

Consider how amazing it is that such a prospect is even possible. Democrats around the country worked extremely hard to elect a Democratic President, a huge majority in the House, and 59 Democratic Senators -- only to watch as the Supreme Court is moved further the Right? Even for those who struggle to find good reasons to vote for Democrats, the prospect of a better Supreme Court remains a significant motive (the day after Obama's election, I wrote that everyone who believed in the Constitution and basic civil liberties should be happy at the result due to the numerous Supreme Court appointments Obama would likely make, even if for no other reason).

greenwald quoted for posterity - one of the huge "look, you have to fucking support this guy" argts was "the supreme court is important." democratic presidents who are actively moving the party more toward the right should not be supported in their bids for reelection imo. I know everybody already knows I think this but srsly if this is the nominee this shit is getting v. v. old.

underrated aerosmith albums I have loved, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

not that this is the thread for nuance but as much as i dont support kagan we only know her to be to the right of stephens on issues of executive power and civil liberties

max, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)

One of his best posts – lots of nuances (he explains the differences b/w supporting Sotomayor versus Village-consensus nominee Kagan)..

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:24 (fifteen years ago)

jeez, he hasn't even picked anyone yet and Greenwald's spewing the hate

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:24 (fifteen years ago)

um i have been having a breakout. i think it's finally dying down

who the fuck knows (surm), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:24 (fifteen years ago)

oh. yea wrong thread

who the fuck knows (surm), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:24 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, fwiw, kagans tenure as a judge suggests shes a strong advocate for abortion rights

max, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

she's never been a judge tho

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

mr que -- greenwald's hate-spewing is pretty explicitly predicated on the fact that any spewing needs to happen BEFORE O picks someone because Kagan is a mortal lock for confirmation

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

jeez, he hasn't even picked anyone yet and Greenwald's spewing the hate

gotta get out ahead of this one or O will nominate the furthest-right person he can find imo

underrated aerosmith albums I have loved, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

did either Toobin or Tom Goldstein foresee that O. would pick Sotomayor?

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)

oops i was thinking of wood nm me

max, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:28 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, fwiw, kagans tenure as a judge suggests shes a strong advocate for abortion rights

why I will be in her corner no matter what but fuckin A you guys go back to the shit you were claiming about the possibilities for this president back when he was the presumptive nominee

this party sucks so bad in my humble opinion

underrated aerosmith albums I have loved, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

dude you really need to stop saying "you guys" like that

max, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

ok sorry

underrated aerosmith albums I have loved, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)

ne of the huge "look, you have to fucking support this guy" argts was "the supreme court is important." democratic presidents who are actively moving the party more toward the right should not be supported in their bids for reelection imo. I know everybody already knows I think this but srsly if this is the nominee this shit is getting v. v. old.

otm

SCOTUS noms are the ultimate argument for party fealty in big election years, imo, and O might be crapping all over the place

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)

I go back to my post last week: why should we accept a half-measure when the Dems control 59 seats on the Court? Bush got no-equivocations-necessary conservatives Alito and Roberts when his party enjoyed a bare majority.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)

*er, 59 seats in the Senate. lol court-packing

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)

we shouldnt

max, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)

ha, woah, Goldstein did have Sotomayor on his list

http://www.scotusblog.com/2009/01/if-there-is-a-supreme-court-appointment-this-summer/

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

we shouldn't

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

SCOTUS noms are the ultimate argument for party fealty in big election years, imo, and O might be crapping all over the place

ppl who think the democratic party is still generally pretty good will use this argument again I will bet with a "think how much worse it could have been!" flavor

makes me so damn mad, know I can't do anything besides pull the D lever and look forward to my 88th birthday or so when I die and don't have to think of politics as the art of settling for eating shit

underrated aerosmith albums I have loved, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

i can't say if greenwald's analysis of kagan is correct. is the lack of a judicial record a fatal problem? it could be i guess.

but as far as the politics go, there is no point picking a "moderate" for reasons of placating the right. they are going to give any of O's picks hell, it really doesn't matter. they're already whispering about kagan being a dyke! might as well go ham.

goole, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

who is underrated aerosmith albums I have loved

goole, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

was gonna say damn, that's one hell of a court

the not-very-popular answer to yr question, Alfred, is that people would rather be conservative than liberal and this tendency is magnified in our politicians

HI DERE, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i don't think anyone here wants a shitty nominee for the Court. i kinda i think if you sit on the Supreme Court, you should have been a judge, at least once, and American Idol and wet t-shirt contests don't count. so kagan's a no go for me, so when O. calls me, i will let him know.

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

like, is the feeling that kagan is politically expedient? the right will confirm because she loves executive power, and the left wil confirm because she's pro-choice/gays?

xp

goole c'mon think

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

who is underrated aerosmith albums I have loved

artist formerly known as the twink will ferrell

underrated aerosmith albums I have loved, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

i haven't finished reading the greenwald piece yet but lol at "many hours of research" yielding no googleable results for kagan quotes on issues he cares about equalling damning evidence of her.. what, disinterest in them? stupidity? privacy? and double hilarious triple-lutz lol at "public inquiries have yielded NOTHING" and the words "public inquiries" linking to a twitter status update where he asks his followers to do his work for him

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

a.k.a. done with mirrors

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

goole c'mon think

― GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Tuesday, April 13, 2010 10:35 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

ha i need confirmation, i won't make decisions based on inference

goole, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

i'm back in the saddle
i'm back in the saddle a-gain!

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

^^^ fuck yes

would vote Aerosmith onto the Supreme Court

HI DERE, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

it's damning to greenwald because other ppl that have held similar positions have spoken out. so, to him, that's proof of disinterest, i guess. and since she has no actual judicial record, the public/quotable record is sorta all there is?

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

um i have been having a breakout. i think it's finally dying down

― who the fuck knows (surm), Tuesday, April 13, 2010 3:24 PM

haw! this is cracking me up

mr. waffles (Nijoli), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

would vote Aerosmith onto the Supreme Court

all issuing opinions filled with sweet emotion and wispy bandanas

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

well i had a shittier argumentative post but the vibe is too pleasant for me to be too much of a dick

active dems to on the real, get yr fuckin party in order and dudes like me will raise money for you tho fyi, otherwise forget it

underrated aerosmith albums I have loved, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

browbeating other people into doing your political work for you is a total Rahm Emmanuel move

welcome to the Democratic Party, dude!

HI DERE, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

greenwald's right that if ed whelan likes her (or doesn't dislike her) that's a red flag

goole, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

ok i finished.. if you look closely, for all of greenwald's ott namecalling, saying she was "flamboyantly" "preening" about barring military recruitment on campus for instance .. there's just not a lot of meat on these bones honestly

it's like greenwald's version of the rumsfeld/cheney approach to foreign conflict: "there is no evidence of a weapons system.. which must mean they're hiding it very cleverly!"

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

my autobiography, rahm and me, on sale next week iirc

underrated aerosmith albums I have loved, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

greenwald's right that if ed whelan likes her (or doesn't dislike her) that's a red flag

I really want to make my mind up (or try at least) based on something more substantial.

As Stephens himself showed, people can get pretty 'liberated' by getting a lifetime appointment to the highest court. Kagan's positions as SG aside, she might look at things differently on the Court and that, alas, is something for O to determine or investigate that we cannot.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

lol M White otm, we must trust the president to do what's right

underrated aerosmith albums I have loved, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:58 (fifteen years ago)

short of that we can trust greenwald or ed whelan

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

do you know what 'alas' means

goole, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

http://thefaust.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/500full-karen-gillan.jpg

?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

on a certain level, if you are not ever going to trust the President to do his/her job correctly, you should never vote for anyone to take the position

otoh, if you have input for the person doing the job, you should give it and not attempt to emotionally or financially blackmail a bunch of your friends who mostly agree with you into doing it for you

HI DERE, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

man dude I think "blackmail" is an extreme way of describing my position here - "bear down a little instead of accepting any outcome you get as the best we can hope for, in exchange get my support" isn't really "blackmail" imo - it's more "persuade me I should give a shit about the party whose main deal seems to be 'since we are not-as-bad, you have to vote for us'" & I don't think it's really that extreme to ask for better than that

underrated aerosmith albums I have loved, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

I mean seriously: "the reason you have to vote Democratic is the supreme court" was a whole thing during the election. was it not?

underrated aerosmith albums I have loved, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

yes. and?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

...and it sucks that "hey, not as bad as the alternative" is not only the highest aspired-to peak, but the position ppl are willing to defend as practical & reasonable & really kinda the only thing you can expect

underrated aerosmith albums I have loved, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i don't think anyone here wants a shitty nominee for the Court.

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

do we have to do this every god damn day

goole, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

Would you prefer if I called it "extortion"?

My point is that it is not my responsibility to make sure that your specific viewpoint is heard an acknowledged by the Democratic Party. It is yours. I am not the Democratic Party, even though I vote them about 95% of the time; I've never given one of their candidates money and I am registered as having no party affiliation. If there are things I want a candidate to do, I am going to contact his/her office directly and say so. I am not going to tell all of my friends that I am withholding any and all future support towards candidates they are considering voting for or have voted for in the past in an attempt to make them contact these people for me. This, more than anything else, is the massive problem with the way you and other dissenting posters on these threads operate; if you can convince someone via the strength of your argument that your position is superior, that's one thing, but using "well next time I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony" as the thesis behind your rhetoric is beyond infuriating.

The converse argument of "if you don't vote with us, your magic pony will be slaughtered anyway" is just as bullying and just as annoying, btw. Everyone needs to get the fuck over themselves and figure out how to work together while having divergent opinions if we want to present ourselves as anything approaching a unified political voice. If that is not what we want to do, then present your positions, shut the fuck up with the emotional blackmail going both directions, and take responsibility on yourself to harangue the politicians who aren't doing what you want them to do, or are contemplating things you disagree with. Also, make sure you understand what your dealbreaker issues are and what ramifications they represent in the larger picture; if you're cool with the consequences, that's fine. If you're not, that's fine too; work to make sure those consequences don't happen. Don't bitch out your friends for having a different opinion than you.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

there is something here about the opaqueness of practical politics going on tho. does any of us know what to do -- really actually DO -- about moving the needle one way or another, when it comes to this specific supreme pick? what is the avenue for activism, besides uh reading a glenn greenwald post one more time?

i assume there ARE people in washington who work on this angle but i barely understand what that angle is, let alone who those people are.

goole, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:19 (fifteen years ago)

call the white house and your local reps! write them a letter! write you OWN blog post! and letters to the editor! and write bloggers you like and say you agree with them! no joke--my friends who work in congressional offices in DC say that this is the way stuff gets decided, if O & co get word that there is strong dislike of certain nominees, etc.

max, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

i take it a given that all the blog commentary is several steps removed from what is really happening. liberals "speaking out" or conservatives "making their views known" or whatever is kabuki somewhat ... since the senate has to approve, i assume that senate staffers are the important moving pieces here?

xp lol

goole, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

yeah the senate staffers are the people whose minds have to change. but the way they get changed is via a concerted effort by columnists, editorial writers, even bloggers, and their own constituents calling

max, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:24 (fifteen years ago)

i mean there is an extent to which i call my senators a lot just because its the only thing i CAN do and it makes me feel better. but i am told that calls can and do make a big difference

max, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:24 (fifteen years ago)

lol M White otm, we must trust the president to do what's right

I think Dan is right to point out that we basically have to trust the President on all number of different subjects but I see your point and I basically agree w/Greenwald pre-emptively striking to point out to the WH that Kagan hasn't been sold as much of a hopey-changey Justice so far, but my point above is that you can never really tell with nominees. Black was ex-KKK, Eisnhower rued to his death nominating Warren, and I'm sure Ford was bemused by the direction his nominee took.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

ok i finished.. if you look closely, for all of greenwald's ott namecalling, saying she was "flamboyantly" "preening" about barring military recruitment on campus for instance .. there's just not a lot of meat on these bones honestly

it's like greenwald's version of the rumsfeld/cheney approach to foreign conflict: "there is no evidence of a weapons system.. which must mean they're hiding it very cleverly!"

You might need to read the entire column again.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

my point above is that you can never really tell with nominees..

very very important point, here.

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

i've never called a senator, so i'm not even sure what to say: just boil down the greenwald post? it's tough to criticize someone w/no track record

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

Black was ex-KKK]

is this "ironic" or just "funny"

either way, lol

HI DERE, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

Also: Greenwald acknowledged last Friday that Kagan might be perfectly fine on non national security issues.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

imo having these argts is one of the key deals in moving the discourse otherwise I wouldn't bother

I bitch out my friends because I think if enough people said "you know what, we all agree this is bullshit, it's just that some of us have managed to increase our ability to eat shit but we're done with that" it would change the party's priorities - the parties only care about donations, when donations drop they change course, that's asked-and-answered

also, seriously, the whole "support the Dems if for no other reason than the supreme court" issue is looking like a lot of say-whatever-you-have-to-just-get-out-the-vote stuff so you can see how people who did donate money & votes might be a little "wow...kinda total bullshit I guess" -- I mean, lol, dumbass me I guess, but really, "a democratic president is key to a good supreme court" was a huge position

xpost I call local reps & wh every damn time this shit comes up, I might as well be throwing rocks at the milky way.

underrated aerosmith albums I have loved, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

i've never called a senator, so i'm not even sure what to say: just boil down the greenwald post? it's tough to criticize someone w/no track record

― GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Tuesday, April 13, 2010 12:26 PM (29 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

haha glenn didnt seem to have a problem with criticizing someone with no track record

max, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

seriously just call and say whats up, i have some problems with this kagan lady, i wanted to let you know that this is an important issue to me and will change my enthusiasm level come november

call the white house too

max, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

well tbf i'm not sure i'd take seriously a phone call from twink will ferrell

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

ok so this smug moron:

Levin's group of protesters plan to get in the heads of tea partiers at the Tax Day Tea Parties nationwide Thursday and manipulate them right out of relevance. They'll dress like tea partiers, talk like tea partiers and carry signs like tea partiers. In fact, according to Levin they'll be completely indistinguishable from tea partiers, except for one thing -- they won't be out-crazied by anyone.
"Our goal is that whenever a tea partier says 'Barack Obama was not born in America,' we're going be right right there next to them saying, 'yeah, in fact he wasn't born on Earth! He's an alien!" Levin explained. He said that by making the tea parties sound like a gathering of crazy people -- his group's goal -- the movement will lose its power.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/04/inside-man-how-a-prankster-plans-to-destroy-the-tea-party-movement.php

yeah um the whole practice of being an agent provocateur doesn't really work if you broadcast your plan to whole world. duh.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

see i think that is amazing--it's gonna make them all paranoid

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

If you guys defending Kagan just say, "Look, I don't give a shit for unitary executive theories and national security generally," I'd be a little cooler.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

seriously just call and say whats up, i have some problems with this kagan lady, i wanted to let you know that this is an important issue to me and will change my enthusiasm level come november

call the white house too

max, as a senior citizen, let me assure you that at about the 20-year mark w/this you start to feel like a major chump who might better spend his time and energy just bitching about how politicians are cynical assholes

underrated aerosmith albums I have loved, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

You and Morbs hang out at the senior center, doncha.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

If you guys defending Kagan just say, "Look, I don't give a shit for unitary executive theories and national security generally," I'd be a little cooler.

hey check it out, no one's really defending Kagan as far as i can see on this thread

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i was gonna say, has anyone actually stumped for her yet?

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

is this "ironic" or just "funny"

Carl Sagan would later quip, "as a young man, he dressed up in white robes and scared black folks; when he got older, he dressed up in black robes and scared white folks." (wiki)

I'm just saying that it's the kind of thing that would have given me serious pause in '37.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

que maybe you're right and it would be great to see paranoid tea partiers a attack each other-- i'm just thinking it gives tea partiers a greater ability to distance themselves from their *actual* wackadoo conspiracy fringe elements

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

You and Morbs hang out at the senior center, doncha.

most scandalous backgammon table in town my friend

underrated aerosmith albums I have loved, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

btw I want to give my strictly second-hand impression of Kagan but uh hell no, esp. on a googlable forum

would be very entertained to watch her interact with Scalia tho

HI DERE, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

max, as a senior citizen, let me assure you that at about the 20-year mark w/this you start to feel like a major chump who might better spend his time and energy just bitching about how politicians are cynical assholes

― underrated aerosmith albums I have loved, Tuesday, April 13, 2010 12:30 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i mean heres what i can say:

1) my friends who work in congressional offices say this makes a big difference. maybe they are saying this just to placate me? and im sure it means a lot more to reps than it does to senators.

2) tho it wasnt by any means the only thing that pushed it over the edge, there some indication that the return of health-care reform after scott brown was greatly helped by a high volume of calls from supporters

3) what the _hell_ else am i going to do when im feeling mad at the government

max, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

buy some fertilizer

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

hey check it out, no one's really defending Kagan as far as i can see on this thread

Michael White implied we should remember justices evolve – which is entirely possible. I was going to say "Look at Hugo Black," but Black was a pretty serious New Deal supporter.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

I'm reading this Greenwald piece a little more closely and the only thing he says against Kagan that makes a lick of sense is "this is Miers Part II" re: her never saying anything about anything important. The part where he segues into "and that makes her a horrible person" is straight-up garbage and anyone buying into that section of the argument really ought to be ashamed of themselves.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

I missed the part where she said this makes her a horrible person.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

This is far from shrill:

As Katyal noted, Kagan relied upon the warning from Alexander Hamilton about a "feeble executive" that was beloved by Bush/Cheney legal theorists, and she hailed "strong, executive vigor." On the legal spectrum, Kagan clearly sits on the end of strong assertions of executive authority -- perhaps on the far end, almost certainly much further than where Stevens falls. It's perhaps unsurprising that a President -- such as Barack Obama -- would want someone on the Supreme Court who is quite deferential to executive authority. But given that so many of the most important legal and Constitutional disputes center on the proper limits of executive power (including ones that remain to be decided from the Bush era), and that Kagan and her rulings will likely long outlast an Obama presidency (i.e., any pro-executive-power decisions she issues will apply to future George Bushes and Dick Cheneys), shouldn't these pro-executive-power views, by themselves, prompt serious reservations (if not outright opposition) among progressives?

Or this:

Kagan's record on social issues will likely be perfectly satisfactory, even pleasing, to most progressives. She is, by all appearances, solidly pro-choice and in favor of gay equality.

Or this:

And even on the issues where she has been impressive -- such as her refusal to allow military recruiters to recruit at Harvard Law School due to their anti-gay discrimination -- her record is ultimately rather muddled. After preening around for years justifying her ban on military recruiters by decrying the military's ban on gays as "a profound wrong -- a moral injustice of the first order," she quickly reversed that policy and allowed military recruiters onto campus after the Federal Government threatened to withhold several hundred million dollars in funds to Harvard (out of a $60 billion endowment). One can reasonably argue that her obligation as Dean was to secure that funding for the school, but one can also reasonably question what it says about a person's character when they are willing to flamboyantly fight against "profound wrongs" and "moral injustices of the first order" -- only as long as there is no cost involved.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

"preening around"

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

"flamboyantly"

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

i'm just thinking it gives tea partiers a greater ability to distance themselves from their *actual* wackadoo conspiracy fringe elements

Here's my utopian streak: I'd prefer not to go the way of character assassination (especially since it fuels their extant paranoia and victimhood) and counter the Tea Partiers w/facts, argument and persuasion.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

I'd also point out that believing the President holds some degree of executive authority does not automatically translate to believing that that authority should be exercised to its utmost in every situation imaginable but that is completely hypothetical speculation and underlines the first point, namely that she is a total wild card in terms of judicial philosophy aside from women's rights and gay rights,and that depending on how heavily you weight those issues when considering someone's policy stances, that should be enough to determine whether she would be a dealbreaker or not.

xp: Did you not read the segment of his column that starts with "Second..." at all?

HI DERE, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

I'm reading the links and "flamboyantly" and "preening" sound accurate to me ("preening" doesn't need "around" to be effective though).

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

yeah greenwald links to a law review article and says

I don't want to over-simplify this issue or draw too much importance from it; what Kagan was defending back then was many universes away from what Bush/Cheney ended up doing, and her defense of Clinton's theories of administrative power was nuanced, complex and explicitly cognizant of the Constitutional questions they might raise.

his next word is

Still,

and then proceeds to totally bash her for it

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

xp: Did you not read the segment of his column that starts with "Second..." at all?

Yup, and this is a fair response:

Given the severity of the crisis posed by Bush/Cheney lawlessness, what justifies someone with Kagan's platform -- Dean of Harvard Law School and former Clinton White House lawyer -- remaining utterly silent in the face of that assault? Even if one believes that a Law School Dean should generally be attentive to institution-building, didn't the severity of the legal crisis spawned by Bush and Cheney merit serious opposition from those in a position to voice it?

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:51 (fifteen years ago)

Basically, he is taking "we don't know enough about her", which is entirely valid, and using that to extrapolate into "so obviously she wants to put everyone who isn't rah rah America into Guantanamo Bay", which BY HIS OWN ADMISSION he doesn't actually have enough information to definitively say. There's sort of no need for fearmongering if your thesis about someone is "we don't know enough about her to make an accurate prediction of how she would decide as a Supreme Court justice".

HI DERE, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

And actually, depending on the educator, some would argue that as Dean of Harvard Law School she should expressly NOT make public proclamations on these questions as the entire point of running the school is to teach people the basics of the law, not to form idealogues primed to slot into the appropriate Democrat/Republican/other lol 3rd party box.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

Basically, he is taking "we don't know enough about her", which is entirely valid, and using that to extrapolate into "so obviously she wants to put everyone who isn't rah rah America into Guantanamo Bay", which BY HIS OWN ADMISSION he doesn't actually have enough information to definitively say.

rong:

I've written twice before about that record -- here (last paragraph) and here -- and won't repeat those points. Among the most disturbing aspects is her testimony during her Solicitor General confirmation hearing, where she agreed wholeheartedly with Lindsey Graham about the rightness of the core Bush/Cheney Terrorism template: namely, that the entire world is a "battlefield," that "war" is the proper legal framework for analyzing all matters relating to Terrorism, and the Government can therefore indefinitely detain anyone captured on that "battlefield" (i.e., anywhere in the world without geographical limits) who is accused (but not proven) to be an "enemy combatant."

Those views, along with her steadfast work as Solicitor General defending the Bush/Cheney approach to executive power, have caused even the farthest Right elements -- from Bill Kristol to former Bush OLC lawyer Ed Whelan -- to praise her rather lavishly. Contrast all of that with Justice Stevens' unbroken record of opposing Bush's sweeping claims of executive power every chance he got, at times even more vigorously than the rest of the Court's "liberal wing," and the risks of a Kagan nomination are self-evident.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

xpost I'll concede that point.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

So there are actually other reasons besides "Elena Kagan wants the President to torture you" why she may not have made a public proclamation one way or the other; the issue is that we don't know enough about her, period, and that should be enough to oppose her being on the list.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:55 (fifteen years ago)

^^^

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

I'd also point out that believing the President holds some degree of executive authority does not automatically translate to believing that that authority should be exercised to its utmost in every situation imaginable

I have consistently pointed out that what scared and offended me most about Bush/Cheney was how quickly they went to the dark side, like they wanted to and not because a calm assessment of the circumstances warranted it.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

"defending the bush/cheney approach to executive power" is wildly dishonest, even by his own reckoning, Alfred.

as far as agreeing about what constitutes a battlefield i believe she is obliged to agree with her boss eric holder

i can get with the argument that there are plenty of other smart, great people whose records we do know, and they ought to be nominated ahead of her, but greenwald just can't help himself, he has to blast her into smithereens cause that's what he does, even if the evidence isn't really there

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

no alfred i don't think that is a fair response. "she's a famous clinton lawyer and said nothing at the time that i can find. she must loooove dick cheney!! or we can't verify that she doesn't loooove dick cheney."

the fog of vagueness around her is bad enough but greenwald is getting a little bit closing-argumenty here

lol many xps

goole, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

If you're going to blast the right for low-thought pandering to the base and hold intellectual honesty as a value, you should also call it out on the left, and that is exactly what Greenwald is doing here.

HI DERE, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)

Not crazy political myself, but the WSJ interactive of potential nominees is like tasting some exotic candy, and never realized there's this new form of sweet.

who's always getting head from the commissioner (Eric H.), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)

"left's answer to the witty conservative Justice Anton Scalia"

who's always getting head from the commissioner (Eric H.), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:01 (fifteen years ago)

and a lesbian, et al

who's always getting head from the commissioner (Eric H.), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:01 (fifteen years ago)

Have you guys not read her remarks during her confirmation as solicitor general? If you want to say, "They're disturbing but no indication of what she might do on the Court," keep in mind that if as SG she's defending unitary executive theory and Bush-Cheney era executive abuses articulated by an administration that ostensibly opposed them before it won the election.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

Merrick Garland looks like a supporting actor in a David Mamet movie.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

Among the most disturbing aspects is her testimony during her Solicitor General confirmation hearing, where she agreed wholeheartedly with Lindsey Graham about the rightness of the core Bush/Cheney Terrorism template: namely, that the entire world is a "battlefield," that "war" is the proper legal framework for analyzing all matters relating to Terrorism, and the Government can therefore indefinitely detain anyone captured on that "battlefield" (i.e., anywhere in the world without geographical limits) who is accused (but not proven) to be an "enemy combatant."

This (via Sullivan) is germane to the above

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

good thing we're spending so much time talking about Kagan, seeing as how Obama's picked her and stuff

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)

If I can't be on the Court, Que, no one can.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

Alfred, did I mention this guy reminds me of you? (Lookswise; never heard you talk.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSbM75U1vfs

who's always getting head from the commissioner (Eric H.), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:07 (fifteen years ago)

Trying to figure out the pin being worn by Harold Hongju Koh.

who's always getting head from the commissioner (Eric H.), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

Jennifer Granholm: The former beauty queen with no secrets in her closet.

who's always getting head from the commissioner (Eric H.), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

Ha! Eric, I have clean teeth and shave. that guy's more like this version of me:

http://www.toymania.com/custom/Galleries/Moo/01/Ultraman.JPG

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.comicbookreligion.com/img/u/l/Ultraman_Clark_Kent.jpg

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

He is pretty super, yes, and I do wish he'd take better care of his teeth.

who's always getting head from the commissioner (Eric H.), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

Hmm, I'm thinking of several factors looking at these potential nominees:

1. How 'liberal' they would be and likely to please me (and presumably much of the Dem base);

2. How costly their confirmation process would be politically and how that would affect November;

3. Damn the political capital expended, how well they would do at arriving at consensus as this was Stevens forte of sorts; and

4. How young they are?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:18 (fifteen years ago)

5. How hot.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:19 (fifteen years ago)

re: the tea party punk'd guy -- give me a break.

the right wing echo chamber has pimped the tea party people for a year, even though they are not, electorally, much of a proven force, and certainly not novel at all. now one player in the left wing "echo chamber" (though i don't think they are equivalent at all) is boosting this one kid with a transparently dumb idea to fuck with them. i'm struggling to come up with the right metaphor: a cross-breeze in a tempest in a teacup?

good luck usa.

goole, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

2. How costly their confirmation process would be politically and how that would affect November;

we know the answer to this: it will have the maximum cost possible, no matter who is nominated. so this is a wash, across all possibles

goole, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:22 (fifteen years ago)

5. How hot.

I reiterate. "Beauty queen."

who's always getting head from the commissioner (Eric H.), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)

Garland:

1. Meh
2. I can see him as confirmable.
3. Good but in the right direction? I like that he clerked for Brennan.
4. 57 is okay. We might get 30 years out of him.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)

so this is a wash, across all possibles

I assume you mean that the Repubs are going to be unyielding. Depending on the nominee this may or may not cost the Repubs more.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)

Best-named SCOTUS justice:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucius_Quintus_Cincinnatus_Lamar_(II)

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:25 (fifteen years ago)

no way dude, it's Felix Frankfurter

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:25 (fifteen years ago)

get it

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

he called his young disciples, "Felix's Hot Dogs."

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

youve all gone gabbneb

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:27 (fifteen years ago)

Wood:

1. Mikey likes it
2. Far more difficult confirmation. Base stirring stuff. I don't know how that plays out after all the talk of lack of intensity among Dem voters this year.
3. Not likely to be anything but a staunch liberal on the Court, imho
4. 59. What I said about Garland.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

Granholm:

1. No idea, really.
2. White pretty lady, ex-prosecutor, 'conservative', but shady business deals? I like what the judge she clerked for said about her.
3. No idea.
4. 51. Woohoo!

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

Karlan:

1. Sounds good to me and I like her spirit though Granholm has the broadest I've seen so far.
2. Nuclear war. She might get confirmed by hearty Senate Dems but man, I can see the wingnuts going off the deep end on a lezzy, Jewish, baby-killing uppity, 'living document' lady.
3. Like Wood, I see her as a lightening rod more than a uniter.
4. 51. Awesome.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:35 (fifteen years ago)

my very superficial knowledge of Karlan makes me really want her to get on the court, but yeah, nuclear war.

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

Koh:

Not going to happen, imo.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

Aren't there at least a couple of lesbians on the short list?

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:37 (fifteen years ago)

Two luscious jacksons.

who's always getting head from the commissioner (Eric H.), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:37 (fifteen years ago)

Napolitano:

Her neither. Why move her from DHS?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

Patrick:

Unlikely. Doesn't want the job and is vigorously trying to keep his present one.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

While I would love to see another William O. Douglas, ideologically speaking, it is important to remember Douglas set all SCOTUS records for being the lone vote in a long series of 8-1 opinions. Politically speaking, the ability to pull four other justices to side with you is the real sweet spot.

I would give up longevity on the bench (a young appointee), and shoot for a possible 12 year tenure, or even less, if Obama could deliver a nominee who would catalyze a majority of votes for moderation in the face of Scalia, Alito, Roberts and Thomas.

Aimless, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

Sullivan:

1. Seems great to me.
2. I'm not sure how this would play out but it wouldn't be pretty though it might bring out the more toxic prejudice amongst the Repubs to their discredit. She seems more polished (and corporate) and accomplished than Karlan in many respects.
3. Better than Karlan, worse than Granholm maybe, but that may overstate Granholm's legal wizardry.
4. 54. Excellent.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)

While I would love to see another William O. Douglas, ideologically speaking, it is important to remember Douglas set all SCOTUS records for being the lone vote in a long series of 8-1 opinions

Not sure about his jurisprudence even if I agree with his politics tbh.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)

the brazenness of his results-oriented jurisprudence is fabulous though.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)

Aren't there at least a couple of lesbians on the short list?

Karlan, Sullivan, and probably Kagan.

HOOS zing-steen (jaymc), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)

Aimless, the lone voice may win in the long term but it's pretty lonely so I tend to agree with the idea of a consensus builder. The advantage to younger nominations is not just the longer influence of legal tendancies I approve of, but also the longer experience at the highest level the nominee will get added to longer relationships with fellow (though not always like-minded) justices.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

Kagan isn't very out, though.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:47 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think Sunstein or Sears have many chances, either, fwiw.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:48 (fifteen years ago)

I think I'm tending Sullivan based on that little WSJ thing but I need to talk to my law racket pals and see what they think and do some more reading.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:50 (fifteen years ago)

can I just say that having a wife who works at HLS is total bummerz on this thread

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:51 (fifteen years ago)

someone's got gossip!

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:52 (fifteen years ago)

take it to 77

HOOS zing-steen (jaymc), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:52 (fifteen years ago)

can I just say that having a wife who works at HLS is total bummerz on this thread

Gotta stay shtum?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 17:55 (fifteen years ago)

I think everyone could pretty much agree that not putting your wife's workplace on blast on the Internet is what one would call "a smart thing to do".

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

HL$$$$$$

millions now zinging will never lol (WmC), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

agreed. we understand.

Aimless, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

New name:

Sidney Thomas, 56, of Montana

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:05 (fifteen years ago)

so basically yr saying she's a total lesbo right

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

My understanding from commenters on news threads is that everyone at Harvard saw her w/her SO though she was otherwise discreet about it, gbx, but then that's the understanding of a person who believes random commenters on news sites, so who knows?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

off-topic: lol'ing at Scott Brown voting with Dems to break Republican filibuster on unemployment benefits. TRAITOR

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

You can't have two justices named Thomas.

HOOS zing-steen (jaymc), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

Except that Thomas (Sidney) looks far more confirmable than any of the potential nominees that I would prefer.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:19 (fifteen years ago)

would you refer to them by their first names, like with the Williams sisters

Judge Clarence
Judge Sydney

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

I get the impression that if Sidney were confirmed, he would become the default Thomas since Clarence's scandalous confirmations are well in the past, now, and he doesn't ask many questions excpet for when to pick up Scalia's rulings and where to sign.

Incidentally, I find it intriguing that Clarence Thomas and Sears are pals.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

bonded over Long Dong Silver porn screenings

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:26 (fifteen years ago)

nah, Thomas 106 and Thomas 112, like the Bushes (xxp)

millions now zinging will never lol (WmC), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:26 (fifteen years ago)

god I fucking hate Clarence Thomas. an abortion of a SC justice.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:26 (fifteen years ago)

^^^ constitutionally protected

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

Your hatred makes the members of the Federalist Society chortle with undisguised glee, Shakey. Recall that he replaced Thurgood Marshall. He represents the right's upraised middle finger.

Aimless, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)

Thomas could not allow himself to get aborted because abortion is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 19:10 (fifteen years ago)

Read an article the other day saying two or three conservative members would maybe be retiring around 2016 and that if O wants to play it safe now then it may pay off in 6 years resulting in a liberal Supreme Court.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 19:12 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe I'm weird, but I can't bring myself to hate Thomas. His opinions lack the hysteria of Scalia's, so I'm prepared to view him as the Geir Hongro of strict constructionalism, coldly striking down without raising his blood pressure what's not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

What does that mean? xp

Mordy, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

Read an article the other day saying two or three conservative members would maybe be retiring around 2016 and that if O wants to play it safe now then it may pay off in 6 years resulting in a liberal Supreme Court.

This seems slightly more plausible than me waking up tomorrow having spontaneously grown a secondary penis. Only slightly, though.

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

Of course it makes sense: Obama's a Communist dictator who will rule for life, therefore waiting until 2016 for Scalia and Thomas to die makes sense.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 19:19 (fifteen years ago)

2 penii 1 mod

Mr. Que, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

http://g-giannini.de/bioprodukte/images/mezze_penne.jpghttp://www.scavengeinc.com/images/legavenue/mod-girl-costume.jpg

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

Ew.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 19:22 (fifteen years ago)

lol Adam, are you talking about this Slate article: http://www.slate.com/id/2250579/

This article could charitably called "making up shit in my bathroom mirror web column"

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

the Geir Hongro of strict constructionalism

wow

kinda wish the whole world knew about geir hongro so i could use this in casual conversation, it's v apt

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 19:28 (fifteen years ago)

there is likely a surprising section of the real world who do know about Geir, considering how long he's been online talking about music and how memorable he is

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 19:29 (fifteen years ago)

I go back to my post last week: why should we accept a half-measure when the Dems control 59 seats on the Court? Bush got no-equivocations-necessary conservatives Alito and Roberts when his party enjoyed a bare majority.

― Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 15:31 (4 hours ago) Permalink

Not only that, Clinton gave us Ginsburg with a smaller majority.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

Just nominate Sullivan IMO. Republicans will spend 3 months looking like bigots, then she'll show up for the confirmation hearing and be AWESOME and they'll look petty and pathetic.

Also, she's hot.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 20:50 (fifteen years ago)

Yes, DERE, that's the article. Sounds to me like someone's trying to rationalize what could possibly be Obama yet again caving in to Republican wants in the spirit of bipartisanship.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 13 April 2010 20:55 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ea9JVnck_-E

biologically wrong (Z S), Tuesday, 13 April 2010 23:34 (fifteen years ago)

well i guess i'm glad yall talked actual politics for 200 posts today instead of the usual tea party nonsense but wow some of you are depressing, john d and alfred wholeheatedly otm

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 April 2010 02:26 (fifteen years ago)

I get the impression that if Sidney were confirmed, he would become the default Thomas since Clarence's scandalous confirmations are well in the past, now, and he doesn't ask many questions excpet for when to pick up Scalia's rulings and where to sign.

Not only is this bullshit, but it does us a disservice. Thomas is farther to the right than Scalia, as his decisions and Scalia himself have pointed out many times. There aren't many Hamdi v. Rumsfeld or Texas v. Johnson cases rattling around Thomas' closet.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 02:41 (fifteen years ago)

The Washington Monthly website re a special election just held for a US House seat in Florida won by Democrat Ted Deutch

there have been six special elections for U.S. House seats since the president's inauguration 14 months ago: NY20, IL5, CA32, CA10, NY23, and FL19. Democrats have won all six.

Rep.-elect Deutch will be sworn in fairly soon, and the House Democratic caucus will return to 254 members.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 12:53 (fifteen years ago)

http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/13/title-2/?ref=opinion

So if Anwar al-Awlaki is a terrorist now, he should be indicted but since he's in Yemen now it's not likely he's gonna come back for legal proceedings. But since he's an American citizen that's the procedure that should be followed, right?

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

I believe the normal process is that Mossad agents don wigs and strangle him

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:08 (fifteen years ago)

And then the US government expresses disappointment

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:08 (fifteen years ago)

So maybe the question to ask is whether Americans should be convinced of that — whether assassinating terrorists really helps keep us safe.

This is some bullshit btw. That's not the question to ask.

Mordy, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

(If we all agreed that it was ethical and legal and that a particular terrorist was in fact a terrorist and we had indisputable evidence -- would someone say we shouldn't assassinate them because they'll just get replaced anyway?)

Mordy, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

here's something a little diverting, via tom ricks' blog

http://www.scribd.com/doc/22129438/Captain-Mark-Hamilton-Charge-Sheet-DD-Form-458-11-03-09-Redacted

charge sheet against a captain bounced from the coast guard.

charge VI, specification 2 is my favorite.

goole, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

oh i didn't know you could c+p from scribd! awesome

Specification 2: In that Captain Herbert M. Hamilton, III, U.S. Coast Guard, Sector Anchorage,Alaska, on active duty, did at or near Juneau, Alaska, on or about 18 February 2009 disgracehimself and compromise his standing as an officer by calling the Sector Anchorage CommandCenter from his government issued cellular telephone while engaged in sexual activity.

goole, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

Is it weird and questionable that the write-up specifies sex "outside of marriage"? Which makes me think for some reason it's MORE prohibited than marriage itself? I mean, what would have happened if the Captain wanted to MARRY an enlisted person instead of just smashing them?

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

the guy was already married

goole, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

"yes we're married. oh you mean TO EACH OTHER?"

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:02 (fifteen years ago)

Oh, okay. But still...the military can punish you for cheating on your spouse?

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:02 (fifteen years ago)

technically, yeah.

goole, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

Conduct unbecoming an officer.

Aimless, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)

for anyone feeling outraged this morning & looking to keep it up

http://www.washingtonian.com/articles/people/15265.html

― max, Thursday, April 1, 2010 11:10 AM (1 week ago) Bookmark

hey remember this? well, he's out

http://washingtonindependent.com/82203/powerful-steve-kappes-will-retire-as-cias-deputy-director

goole, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:10 (fifteen years ago)

GOOD RIDDANCE

max, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

(If we all agreed that it was ethical and legal and that a particular terrorist was in fact a terrorist and we had indisputable evidence -- would someone say we shouldn't assassinate them because they'll just get replaced anyway?)

― Mordy, Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:13 PM (1 hour ago)

"ethical and legal" would imply that we were going about this business with some sort of legality and ethical perspective. which is sort of a leap from how we're handling it now

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)

Right, but the solution to our legal ethics failing isn't to abandon them entirely and move onto some pragmatic nonsense that is itself ethically troublesome. The solution is to go back to legality and ethics.

Mordy, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

Awesome piece by Sara Robinson about the current sedition talk:

http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/2010041405/none-dare-call-it-sedition

talking about sedition: legal

actively planning it: not so much

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)

it's kinda funny seeing the left having to resort to law-and-order arguments, even if they're right and it's appropriate.

under other circumstances, the left has historically been a-okay with flaunting laws and calling for the overthrow of the legitimately elected US gov't

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 21:21 (fifteen years ago)

so?

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 April 2010 21:23 (fifteen years ago)

Thing I've always seen about folks touting their law & order bona fides is that they tend to be all about the latter, and who gives a fuck about the former.

It can come down to your authoritative vs authoritarian split.

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 21:24 (fifteen years ago)

so?

so buttons!

the ironies of politics

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)

Actually, SMC, how are law and order arguments somehow alien to the left?

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 21:41 (fifteen years ago)

have you heard of this thing called segregation

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

it was the law in some parts

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

or y'know, burning your draft card

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

or getting an abortion

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

You're just jizzing rhetoric here, sorry...

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

hmm okay well there were several leftist groups with roots in the late 50s/early 60s civil rights movement who explicitly called for violent insurrection - Black Panther Party, Weathermen, etc. Took awhile for those on the left to thoroughly disown these groups, and they were quite fashionable for several years. And many of the previous civil rights battles were rather explicitly founded on the principle of disobeying a law that you believe is wrong, regardless of its actual legal grounds and history.

but thx for use of inappropriate metaphor. thought you might be able to read between the lines.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

Thing I've always seen about folks touting their law & order bona fides is that they tend to be all about the latter, and who gives a fuck about the former.

He article is more about the general legitimacy of our Democratic Republicisn't it? In addition to being free-market fundamentalists, I get the impression a lot of these people derive a lot of their self-esteem in identifying closely with the founders but there's nothing either in the Constitution nor in its spirit nor really in the generation that gave us the Republic that strongly implies they were to be turned into semi-godlike figures who had to revered like some, I don't know, king or something. TJ went so far as to recommend rewriting the Constitution every 20 years so that future generations wouldn't be tyrannized by prior ones, though I find that idea batshit insane.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

I say this as, broadly speaking, a big fan of the Black Panther Party btw. Just pointing out that the left has not historically had any problems with advocating for the disobedience of laws that one finds personally abhorrent. That doesn't necessarily cross the line into sedition, but the underlying political principle is the same.

xp

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

Actually, SMC, how are law and order arguments somehow alien to the left?

― show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, April 14, 2010 4:41 PM (19 minutes ago) Bookmark

oh c'mon this is art of pretend forgetfulness---it's not that they're alien, it's that lefty movements have (like pretty much all "movements") have often been predicated on gov't subversion (as SMC points out). cf black bloc anarchists and the like

for progressives to get "hey now, teabaggers, this is the legitimately elected GOVT we're talking about here" is at least kind of ironic

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:04 (fifteen years ago)

and we don't have to go back to the 60s either - left spent a large part of Dubya's first term crying about how he was NOT actually the duly elected President iirc. I'm sure there were plenty of lefty crackpot groups on the level of the Huttaree and whatnot who were all too happy to dispute the legitimacy of the Bush regime while they threw bricks at bank buildings or burned down SUVs or whatever.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i was one of these people and knew plenty more fwiw

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

Wish they had finished the job, tbh.

fuckin' lame, bros (latebloomer), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

<morbs></morbs>

fuckin' lame, bros (latebloomer), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

Just pointing out that the left has not historically had any problems with advocating for the disobedience of laws that one finds personally abhorrent. That doesn't necessarily cross the line into sedition, but the underlying political principle is the same.

I understand resistance to unjust laws - mostly through civil disobedience (and note Thoreau's acceptance of the majority's right to legislate) but I have zero patience with nullifiers and petty shit-disturbers on either side and the same ganglike mentality that served the Black Panthers oh so well in the end still informs shit like this which Daly in the grand old tradition of loony lefties tried to exploit. The attitude, one of blind entitlement even if informed by years of injustice is not only childishly feckless but tends to be counter-productive most of the time.

As to fellow travelers and their 'sympathy' with the communists and anarchists, I believe that stems from a love of free speech and a distrust of authoritarianism. The loyalty oath that you would have been forced to sign in the 50's would have been a whole lot worse under an actual communist regime which is why my old lefty grandfather was all about unions and progressive politics but thought Stalinists were little better than McCarthy.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:16 (fifteen years ago)

ty MW. I am not forgetting a damned thing. People on the left are possibly only being 'hey now baggers' because we spent about five years listening to exactly the same assholes telling us we were anti-American and if we didn't like it, tough shit, aren't our guns cool? Seriously, I don't need a primer on civil rights protest and the handful of *armed* violently radical left groups (less numerous than armed wingnuts currently around) operating at that time. Besides, nonviolent resistance wasn't invented by the right.

What bothered me most was the way you put it above just sounds a bit like a dog-whistle to people who think those on the left are the TRUE lawless and disordered ones, or are unconcerned about crime or safety.

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:17 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I agree with all that.

(also your old lefty grandfather a bit smarter than some of his peers, evidently)

xp

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

I also like the sound of lefty grandfather.

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:19 (fifteen years ago)

He DID always tell me that the one thing thing the CPUSA always got right was racism.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:20 (fifteen years ago)

and the handful of *armed* violently radical left groups (less numerous than armed wingnuts currently around) operating at that time.

don't know what you're basing this conclusion on, tbh. seems like a difficult thing to authoritatively quantify.

What bothered me most was the way you put it above just sounds a bit like a dog-whistle to people who think those on the left are the TRUE lawless and disordered ones, or are unconcerned about crime or safety.

lolz are you familiar with my politics at all

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:21 (fifteen years ago)

Both grandfathers were(are) old lefty libruls, though my enate one (still alive) was a judge and worked much more 'within the system'.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:21 (fifteen years ago)

lolz are you familiar with my politics at all

Caesaropapist anarcho-syndical Menschevik monarchist, right?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:23 (fifteen years ago)

I am not forgetting a damned thing. People on the left are possibly only being 'hey now baggers' because we spent about five years

not to be a pedant but... five years? are you forgetting three years or what?

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:24 (fifteen years ago)

I believe that Bush was pretty legitimately elected in '04, sadly.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)

NO -- leftists spent the last three years of the Bush administration smiling smugly.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)

xpost

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)

Caesaropapist anarcho-syndical Menschevik monarchist, right?

lol I'm more of a Makhno-vist

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)

SMC, yes am fairly familiar w/your politics, which is why I thought it was a rum description. OTOH I haven't quite trained myself to find a non-sardonic altername for 'pro-lifers' so there you go. I mark the hard core of the cryingeagle.gif bullshit period at five years from 9/11 to roughly election day 2006. After that, things seemed much less tense.

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:28 (fifteen years ago)

I guess the thing is that even as an avowed leftist I don't think either side has a monopoly on being FOR law & order & public safety and AGAINST crime & sedition & violent rhetoric. That stuff falls on both sides of the fence, and it may or may not be permissable depending on where your sympathies lie. I have no problem with supporting law-breaking actions if the law, imho, is totally inadequate and not serving the people as it should. But being against healthcare reform and hating black people, for example, are not justifiable grounds for sedition. Whereas corrupt, violent cops routinely murdering people in your community without any respect for due process of law is grounds for forcibly resisting them, imho.

I'm just uncomfortable with the tone of that article - which is very holier-than-thou about the semantics of sedition and how the right is SO WRONG to challenge the supreme authority of our representative democratic Republic, etc. The Republic has been, and should continue to be, challenged when it does things that are illegitimate or unfair. Determining what exactly those things are is a subject for debate, but let's not pretend like the left is somehow totally above the fray here, its just disingenuous.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:39 (fifteen years ago)

I think many of us who are not fire-breathing dittoheads take umbrage at being called un-American ("Move back to France, commie fag!") by flag-waving 'patriots' who, when they lose an election or vote get all 'sic semper tyrannis' on the same system of government they were mindlessly defending only months before.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:42 (fifteen years ago)

I find it more laughable than offensive but sure, I feel you.

the end result is that the right is doing major damage to their political machinery with these shenanigans - which only makes me laugh that much harder. Like, keep up the seditious nutjobbery! That is guaranteed to lose elections and sideline your legislative priorities for a generation.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:45 (fifteen years ago)

ok that i agree with, i think i mistook your larger point earlier

xp shakes

k3vin k., Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:46 (fifteen years ago)

Oh, here we go: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/apr/14/sarah-palin-contract-speaking-jet-california

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:47 (fifteen years ago)

that was frontpage news for the SF Chronicle today btw

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:48 (fifteen years ago)

sideline your legislative priorities for a generation

I know that asking for a coherent political philosophy in a major US party is a fool's errrand, but what exactly are their priorities? Hating foreigners, giving America back to corporate interests so they can fuck us more freely and starting wars?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:49 (fifteen years ago)

Ol' Law and Order Jerry Brown will get to the bottom of it!

but it's a tempest in a teapot really. If it was public funds that were paying for her visit it would be a bigger deal, but they were private funds that the university didn't want to disclose. So unless the university is doing some shady accounting, they shouldn't really have anything to hide. I imagine this will blow over by the time she gets here. It does add to the narrative of her being a greedy harpy though.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:50 (fifteen years ago)

xp

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:50 (fifteen years ago)

But being against healthcare reform and hating black people, for example, are not justifiable grounds for sedition. Whereas corrupt, violent cops routinely murdering people in your community without any respect for due process of law is grounds for forcibly resisting them, imho.

ha -- SEZ YOU. What Obama's election has wrought is a renewed insight into power: who rules, what you do with the power when you get it, and how do the disenfranchised respond when Their Guys no longer hold elected office. For all the White House-propelled chatter about the Reagan and FDR parallels, those guys did not waste time in establishing a New Order. As Garry Wills remarked in his review of the Remnick bio on Obama, the guys around the President and the prez himself genuinely believed they didn't need muscle-flexing; they believed their "narrative" about Obama as a Transformative Agent. FDR inherited a helluva worse mess than Obama, and for all his charm he didn't waste time in conciliation. Like Obama, he got a mandate -- electoral, popular, and legislative.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:50 (fifteen years ago)

but what exactly are their priorities? Hating foreigners, giving America back to corporate interests so they can fuck us more freely and starting wars?

their complete ideological incoherency is a big problem, no doubt about it. They have no agenda, really, it's all just empty nihilism and sore-loser-ism.

xp

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:51 (fifteen years ago)

wait Alfred are you suggesting that Obama hasn't made enough conciliatory gestures to the right...? I'm not sure I get yr point there.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:53 (fifteen years ago)

At least with Reagan we were headed towards friendly facsism.

xpost

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:54 (fifteen years ago)

and for all his charm he didn't waste time in conciliation.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:55 (fifteen years ago)

Talking about FDR.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)

I just don't put the onus on Obama is all - the right rabidly hated him from the get-go, I have no idea what more he could have done to assuage them.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)

To be fair, these guys had a blast under Clinton, too.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:57 (fifteen years ago)

wait Alfred are you suggesting that Obama hasn't made enough conciliatory gestures to the right...? I'm not sure I get yr point there.

No -- he spent TOO MUCH time. If a segment of the population was already prepared to denounce you as illegitimate, why waste time wooing them? So far, I've seen no evidence that Obama's inclusive gestures have eliminated the threat from his right flank, so why try?

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:57 (fifteen years ago)

To be fair, these guys had a blast under Clinton, too.

Oh yeah. Remember Dick Armey? "He's YOUR president, not mine."

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:58 (fifteen years ago)

yeah Clinton never had a mandate. never.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:58 (fifteen years ago)

If a segment of the population was already prepared to denounce you as illegitimate, why waste time wooing them? So far, I've seen no evidence that Obama's inclusive gestures have eliminated the threat from his right flank, so why try?

okay yeah, I agree with this completely (sorry - "didn't waste time" can be read either way you know)

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:59 (fifteen years ago)

He won on a plurality in '92 but what about '96? He basically ran as a Republican and the militias and McVeys etc., still went apeshit.

xpost

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:01 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think Obama makes genstures to the right becuase they think they'll get him anywhere. I think he makes genstures to the right so that later he can show waht do-nothing obstructionist partisnans they are.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:02 (fifteen years ago)

yeah maybe. the legislative end result is kinda shitty tho

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:02 (fifteen years ago)

He won on a plurality in '92 but what about '96?

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:13 (fifteen years ago)

No he didn't

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:13 (fifteen years ago)

He won 43 percent of the vote in '92.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:14 (fifteen years ago)

Obama's the first Dem since LBJ to get over fifty percent.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:15 (fifteen years ago)

FDR inherited a helluva worse mess than Obama, and for all his charm he didn't waste time in conciliation. Like Obama, he got a mandate -- electoral, popular, and legislative.

― Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 22:50 (22 minutes ago)

FDR had a much larger Congressional majority to work with, to be fair.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:15 (fifteen years ago)

Perot ran in '96 too. Clinton never won a majority.

xp

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:16 (fifteen years ago)

60 votes before Scott Brown is a helluva mandate in 2010.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:16 (fifteen years ago)

oh the fights i had with gabbneb about Clinton's electoral prowess

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:17 (fifteen years ago)

sorry if this has been asked and answered before (end of a long day for me and i haven't kept up with the thread and only sparingly kept up with the blogs): why did mitch mcconnell claim that dodd's bill will "institutionalize" and/or "constitute a permanent bailout of" too-big-to-fail entities? i really don't get it.

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:17 (fifteen years ago)

I don't want to overstate the value of congressional mandates since, in FDR's case, its size inevitably leads to splintering once patronage is given out (he later admitted gaining those huge majorities in '32, '34, and '36 made life way too difficult).

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:17 (fifteen years ago)

The Democrats have always been disorganized. Remember the famous Will Rogers' quote "I belong to no organized party, I'm a Democrat."

micheline, Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:22 (fifteen years ago)

wait, this is the basis of the GOPs argument: "Among other things, they oppose the creation of a $50 billion fund, raised by imposing a fee on large financial institutions, that would cover the cost of winding down failed firms. Better, they say, to avoid the perception that any funds can be used to wind down institutions, and to let them fail"? WTF?? so they're against drawing money from big corporations as a crisis-insurance fund for those corporation's possibly failing on the pretense that the little guy shouldn't fund bailouts?

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:23 (fifteen years ago)

why did mitch mcconnell claim that dodd's bill will "institutionalize" and/or "constitute a permanent bailout of" too-big-to-fail entities? i really don't get it.

because McConnell is a pissy little bitch who doesn't want Obama to be able to claim any other legislative victories before the mid-term elections, bipartisan or otherwise. That being the case, he doesn't want to offer any Republican cooperation, so for the purposes of political expediency he needs to develop some kind of sound-byte-able justification for withholding Republican votes, and has decided that the optimum way to go is to (inaccurately, imho) portray the bill as being synonymous with one of Obama's more politically unpopular moves, the previous financial bailout. It makes perfect sense from a political perspective - the deliberate mischaracterization (akin to how they characterized the HCR bill) stokes the flames of partisan ire, energizes the base, and rhetorically is an attempt to paint Obama into a corner. It might work in the short term. But the bill will ultimately pass, and when no more bailouts are forthcoming, the anger at it will quickly fade (just like HCR).

xp

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:26 (fifteen years ago)

hope you're right that it passes. if it does, i'd say this has been a spectacularly successful congress in terms of passing big initiatives (stimulus; credit card reform; HCR; financial reform).

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:29 (fifteen years ago)

the more interesting thing about this is that prior to McConnell's outburst it looked like a fair number of Republicans were ready to support the bill and that it would be fairly popular. So McConnell's kinda undermining/actively fighting his own constituency here, and it will be interesting to see who splits from him (Snowe and the other "moderates" will, I'm sure. Be interesting to see what Scott Brown does lol - Tea Partiers already hate him. short honeymoon eh)

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 14 April 2010 23:29 (fifteen years ago)

From the Nytimes/CBS poll results that show Tea Party members by and large exactly what you'd think they're like, except better off financially:

Some defended being on Social Security while fighting big government by saying that since they had paid into the system, they deserved the benefits.

Others could not explain the contradiction.

“That’s a conundrum, isn’t it?” asked Jodine White, 62, of Rocklin, Calif. “I don’t know what to say. Maybe I don’t want smaller government. I guess I want smaller government and my Social Security.” She added, “I didn’t look at it from the perspective of losing things I need. I think I’ve changed my mind.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html?hp

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 April 2010 11:27 (fifteen years ago)

why did mitch mcconnell claim that dodd's bill will "institutionalize" and/or "constitute a permanent bailout of" too-big-to-fail entities? i really don't get it.

Mark Warner: "It's either that they don't understand or they choose not to understand."

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/04/sen_mark_warner_mitch_mcconnel.html

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 15 April 2010 11:41 (fifteen years ago)

well, i was surprised to see that tea-partiers are generally better educated than the average american. (xp)

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 15 April 2010 11:43 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah and for some people, college is four years of beer-drinking with a piece of paper at the end saying you went to an average state university. They're still graduates.

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 11:49 (fifteen years ago)

that's MOST people, Suzy. Most people who begin at an average state university rate don't even graduate.

check out the chart here:
http://thechoice.blogs.nytimes.com/tag/university-graduation-rates/

Jesus saved fewer people than my Savior Obama will (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:01 (fifteen years ago)

Cog dissonance in better education yet pervasive belief in a secret Socialist Muslim agenda. Unless ... they're right!!!! OMG! My mind has been blown by the Tea Party! I'm liquidating my assets and buying gold/guns.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:10 (fifteen years ago)

That's insane, Don. But yeah lots of my HS contemporaries who stayed instate at big schools for their undergrad degrees were kind of allergic to learning stuff. Then half of them went to work with their dads, once they were 'college graduates.'

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)

Which is fine! I just don't want to teach them.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:49 (fifteen years ago)

Oh, wait, my bad. I neglected to take into account the typical age of a Tea Partier is well over 45, which means they graduated some 25-ish years ago at the minimum and therefore have had a long while of not being exposed to anything outside their immediate personal and intellectual arena (assuming they ever were to begin with). Twist: they're educated but willfully ignorant! Phew, that's a relief, to realize the Tea Party is just another reactionary outpouring of woe-is-me from the white middle to upper class. I'm reverting back to supporting the Socialist Muslim agenda. Keeping the gold and guns, though, just in case.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:49 (fifteen years ago)

Most people insulate themselves with members of their own socioeconomic class and thus never have any idea that most people who start college don't graduate. We put a huge premium on SAT scores as a measurement of high school achievement but there is no collegiate equivalent. I guess I could posit here that much of undergraduate education is a joke, but that's a topic for another thread.

Jesus saved fewer people than my Savior Obama will (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:50 (fifteen years ago)

Is the tacit claim here that if you went to a "good" college, then you'd favor a broad and sturdy social safety net, contra the tea partiers?

Euler, Thursday, 15 April 2010 12:55 (fifteen years ago)

We had so little money when I was a teenager that I got massive financial aid, but the principle stood that if my mom was paying for even one cent of my education, I'd damn well better finish. I favoured social justice and lefty preoccupations before I got to my college, FWIW.

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 13:08 (fifteen years ago)

It'd be interesting to see what percentage of these college graduates have degrees in business and management. It would go far to explain the anti-gov't sentiment they carry.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:18 (fifteen years ago)

on gop strategy on the financial reform bill, krugman outlined it a while back. it's not just that the gop doesn't want the democrats to have any victories, it's also that they specifically don't want the big banks put under any tighter constraints. but that's an impossible political sell, especially now, so they have to pretend the bill is the opposite of what it really is. and of course a good number of republicans and tea-party types have taken up the talking points.

women are a bunch of dudes (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:25 (fifteen years ago)

xp Not only that, but it's a narrow education/lack of exposure to less quantifiable things like art, music, value of human relationships, healthy societies, etc. Not sayin liberal arts majors can't be dicks, but the tenacity of the "me and mine" worldview that these people have is NOT a symptom of valuing the rich tapestry of life.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:26 (fifteen years ago)

rich tapestry of life vs. lifestyles of the rich

women are a bunch of dudes (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:27 (fifteen years ago)

Lifestyles of the comfortably middle-class, more like.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:29 (fifteen years ago)

Ok---so it's not so much that getting an education from a "good" college will inoculate you from the "me and mine worldview", as it is that getting the "right kind" of education will do so?

I'm not asking for the sake of criticism, just for the sake of getting clear on what's thought (here) to be the link between education and left-wing values.

Euler, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:30 (fifteen years ago)

there is no actual link between education and left-wing values as far as I can tell

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:32 (fifteen years ago)

sorry, but teaching at a public university for ten years has convinced me that thoughtful, engaged faculty teaching the liberal arts curriculum does little for a student's self-development.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:32 (fifteen years ago)

Exactly xpost to Dan.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:32 (fifteen years ago)

That's my take too, but it seemed like maybe something like that was being assumed here.xp

Euler, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:33 (fifteen years ago)

We're derailing this thread, but I posted some of these thoughts in that professor/student thread a couple of weeks ago. If you want to own your own business and have no interest in art history or the English novel, why should you waste your time in college? Get an apprenticeship or go to a trade school. I don't believe in the edifying power of education when students have no wish to be edified.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:35 (fifteen years ago)

like, I think a lot of people feel like learning things opened their minds and made them appreciate a wider variety of things, but there are just as many people for whom learning things closed their minds and made them appreciate the narrow band of things they already appreciated

there are also a bunch of people in the second group who think they are in the first

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:36 (fifteen years ago)

I'm interested in part b/c I attended last month a talk by one of the greatest philosophers alive today, and the key to his argument for "moral realism" was that liberal cosmopolitan values are obvious to any suitably rational agent. I'm dubious, but I gather this view is widely held.

Euler, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:37 (fifteen years ago)

it's widely held by liberals, i bet

Mr. Que, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:39 (fifteen years ago)

Business school duh. Connections! Training! Learning the right words to use! Induction into the modern Business Culture! Business school is HUGE in middle America. It's a common thought among them that if you're in college and you aren't going for a business major (or law or pre-med) then you are wasting your time and money.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:39 (fifteen years ago)

Euler who was that?

goole, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)

The great liberal fallacy for years (rereading Lionel Trilling a few weeks ago reminded me) has been the so-called casual relationship between education and "open-mindedness" (which is, of course, synonymous with liberalism for these people).

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)

H1Iary Putn4m (did I googleproof ok? guess so) xp

Euler, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)

Also 25 years ago it was aspirational to non-college small-business parents to make sure their kid got a 'useful' degree, even if coming back to work for Dad.

Good teachers made the difference for me well before I got to college - my parents were kind of intimidated by my grades even as they demanded that's what I bring home. Mostly the teachers were of the 'arguing is OK' mindset, whereas my parents were not.

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:42 (fifteen years ago)

Adam otm -- business school values are not anyone else's values!

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:42 (fifteen years ago)

business school liberal arts college values are not anyone else's values!

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:43 (fifteen years ago)

OKAY OKAY GAWD I TAKE BACK WHAETVER I IMPLIED ABOUT EDUCATION. Maybe it's more that B-school students are kind of a self-selecting bunch.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:43 (fifteen years ago)

If you want to own your own business and have no interest in art history or the English novel, why should you waste your time in college? Get an apprenticeship or go to a trade school. I don't believe in the edifying power of education when students have no wish to be edified.

i guess it depends on just what their business ambitions are. i think that someone who wants to open, i dunno, a convenience store or a construction company would benefit from some courses in basic accounting, business law (i.e., what a contract is), finance (so that they don't get ripped off by banks), and business communications. though that may be done as easily through a 2-year community college instead of a 4-year college.

Did Al Davis Buy the Jets from the Johnson Family When No-One Was Look (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:45 (fifteen years ago)

um, any post-secondary school's students are, sort of by definition, a self-selecting bunch, and there are several thousand private/magnet schools in this country that also fall into that bucket

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)

there are also a bunch of people in the second group who think they are in the first

(many xps to HI DERE)

yes, but i tend to think of this group as the 'NPR crowd' – compulsorily liberal and "socially aware" to the extent of the blogs, television, and literature they consume from within the hemisphere of their pre-formed prejudices; media written from the same viewpoint that confirms their own suspicions. granted, i live in cambridge, ma.

ampersand (remy bean), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:47 (fifteen years ago)

and i think that the real problem w/ business school is that they were catering mostly to students who want to be financial gurus (we've seen how well THAT worked out). the nitty-gritty of actually running a BUSINESS seems an afterthought (from what i've found out from MBAs i've known).

you could say similar things about law school (which caters to BigLaw and leaves grads woefully unprepared to be an ACTUAL lawyer -- trust me on that one) ... and possibly other grad schools (i'll defer to folks who got MAs and Ph.D.s instead of MBAs and JDs).

Did Al Davis Buy the Jets from the Johnson Family When No-One Was Look (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:49 (fifteen years ago)

I teach in the humanities at a big public university in "middle America" and I have very few students ambitious enough to desire owning their own businesses. They aspire to be middle managers and bureaucrats (I mean that not as a diss). They are open to edification as long as it's not too much work, which seems totally fair to me.

Euler, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:49 (fifteen years ago)

Yes, Dan, but people who select, say, History are probably not THAT different from people who select Vocal Performance or Creative Writing. People who select business school are a world apart from any of them, and I don't think that's an unfair generalization (altho obv it is a generalization).

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:50 (fifteen years ago)

Adam otm -- business school values are not anyone else's values!

Well I never said that. But I'd imagine any business education would promote Rah-Rah Capitalist Narcissism, respect for an unwavering corporate hierarchy, and slavish devotion to profits/the bottom line.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:50 (fifteen years ago)

I think the biggest education that one gets in a liberal arts school - apart from the vast galaxy of ways to get wasted - is learning social codes. How to talk in front of a group, how to ask appropriate questions, when to shut up, intuiting the right level of respect to show for various people in your life. Second biggest is that apart from the actual subject matter, some professors are just great at getting you to think. There are other ways to learn these things I guess but I don't think any are as efficient at it.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:51 (fifteen years ago)

frankly, the older i get the more i think that the REAL benefit of higher education isn't so much the subject matter it teaches as it is the behavior. basically, it implies SOME discipline (being able to get outta bed and get yer ass to class) and self-control (being able to sit down and shut up).

Did Al Davis Buy the Jets from the Johnson Family When No-One Was Look (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:51 (fifteen years ago)

which is an x-post w/ Tracer

Did Al Davis Buy the Jets from the Johnson Family When No-One Was Look (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:52 (fifteen years ago)

I think a lot of graduate programs (like my first, an MFA) set themselves up as trade schools – rigorous, area-specific, and dense. unfortunately, there's a fairly uniform stigma by outside held by most hiring forces privileging their own degree (MBAs hire MBAs) that ends up shutting out students with 'outside' degrees that would provide them with a wider/more universal experience and expertise.

ampersand (remy bean), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:52 (fifteen years ago)

Well I never said that. But I'd imagine any business education would promote Rah-Rah Capitalist Narcissism, respect for an unwavering corporate hierarchy, and slavish devotion to profits/the bottom line.

Thanks, yes, that's what I meant, I just don't know the big words.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)

frankly, the older i get the more i think that the REAL benefit of higher education isn't so much the subject matter it teaches as it is the behavior. basically, it implies SOME discipline (being able to get outta bed and get yer ass to class) and self-control (being able to sit down and shut up).

Haha -- how many college students master those values?

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)

But I'd imagine any business education would promote Rah-Rah Capitalist Narcissism, respect for an unwavering corporate hierarchy, and slavish devotion to profits/the bottom line.

ehhhh – a bit of a generalization.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)

I'd be more comfortable with business school grads weighing in.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:54 (fifteen years ago)

I think some of you guys should actually spend some time looking at business school curricula if you're going to denigrate them so that you at least sound like you know what you're talking about.

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:54 (fifteen years ago)

I think the biggest education that one gets in a liberal arts school - apart from the vast galaxy of ways to get wasted - is learning social codes. How to talk in front of a group, how to ask appropriate questions, when to shut up, intuiting the right level of respect to show for various people in your life. Second biggest is that apart from the actual subject matter, some professors are just great at getting you to think. There are other ways to learn these things I guess but I don't think any are as efficient at it

i agree. i would add that achieving a high proficiency in written/spoken/correspondence forms of communication is a significantly unique and useful benefit.

ampersand (remy bean), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:54 (fifteen years ago)

I blame Econ professors for Libertarians.

Fetchboy, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:55 (fifteen years ago)

xp Sorry, they're too busy figuring out how to further maximize their demand planning systems to check ILX.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:55 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah. My other half got an email from the CEO of someplce yesterday and it started with "There email address is .. " and I was like, is she a native English speaker? Yes she was. Eek. Which goes to show that you can be a CEO without knowing how to write, but also goes to show that even if you become a CEO, you will still be mocked by strangers if you don't know how to write.

I remember visiting universities when I was a senior in high school, and being genuinely shocked and amazed at how everyone was... quiet in class! It blew me away.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:57 (fifteen years ago)

eh, the "there" thing isn't an indication they can't spell, it's an indication that they didn't proofread. spell check wouldn't have caught that anyway.

Mr. Que, Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:58 (fifteen years ago)

I blame Econ professors for Libertarians.

i dunno about that. i didn't have many (if any) profs who were all that sympathetic to libertarian/extreme laissez-faire economics ... and i went to the undergrad school that gave the world Uncle Milty Friedman.

Did Al Davis Buy the Jets from the Johnson Family When No-One Was Look (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 14:59 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, I wouldn't be surprised, honestly, if b-school voting habits and patterns were not that statistically different from the nation's as a whole. But I'd wager the number of b-school grads applying their education to something more than "me and mine" endeavors (useful though those endeavors may be!) is pretty small. I mean, I know plenty of lawyers, and when I first met them I immediately asked "do you do good law or evil law?" No joke, I've never got a "huh?" response. They always know exactly what I mean and tell me "good" or "evil" without so much as a pause. Though many do then rationalize what it is that they do. Like, "I did good law for a while, and now I'm doing evil law, but in the future after I make enough money I hope to start doing good again."

Point being, the people practicing the profession may be diverse and broad minded, but certain professions (and therefore schools training in that profession) likely lean certain directions, philosophically.

Anyway, little to do with this conversations as a whole, not even taking into account me totally talking out of my butt. I wonder how many Tea Party dicks have grad degrees in any field? Was that in the poll, or was it just generic "graduated from college?" Grad degree holders who are still willfully ignorant of the world around them must be a truly self-selecting bunch.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)

evil pays more ... and St. Francis of Assisi can't pay the legal bill at all even if you think he has a valid case. plus, w/ few exceptions law school students get the whole "you're entering a PROFESSION and not a business" schtick drilled into their heads -- which in some ways does them a real disservice (as we can see w/ the veritable holocaust that's gone on at BigLaw firms during this recession).

besides, what IS your definition of "good law" or "evil law"?!?

Did Al Davis Buy the Jets from the Johnson Family When No-One Was Look (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)

I'm just speaking of personal experience and the number of idiot libertarians I've had to deal with. I went to a university that was maybe 65/35 liberal arts/business and all the business school students (particularly the student body nerds) were gaga over the libertarian profs. I remember once attending a debate between the head of the Econ dept. and the head of the Enviro. Science Dept. discussing whether or not Libertarianism would be good for the environment. It seemed to me throughout the entire debate that the Environmental prof had the upper hand, with the Libertarian just being flustered and repeating the same free market platitudes while getting picked apart. When students were walking out of the debate I was shocked to hear all of the business students praising the Econ. prof and how well he did in the debate. I learned a lot about people that day.

Fetchboy, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:06 (fifteen years ago)

In what sense are tea partiers "willfully ignorant of the world"? If you mean "birthers", that's a different thing. But opposing a broad and stable social safety net doesn't strike me as a matter of ignorance.

Euler, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:09 (fifteen years ago)

aren't most tea partiers birthers? i would think so

Mr. Que, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:10 (fifteen years ago)

nope

goole, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:10 (fifteen years ago)

to quote from NYT The most important clue to the views of the Tea Partiers is who they are: mostly white males, over 45, more wealthy and more conservative than the norm. This is a profile that matches other highly motivated protests over many decades — the supporters of Joseph McCarthy, for example, in the 1950s. Today, the target is not communism, which is no longer a major issue for the right (although “socialism” appears to have taken its place). But what seems to motivate them the most is a fear of a reduction in their own status — economically and socially.

ampersand (remy bean), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:11 (fifteen years ago)

aren't most tea partiers total fucking idiots? i would think so

Mr. Que, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:11 (fifteen years ago)

My problem with certain business school grads is that econ for them isn't possibly one of the most important fields of endeavor in moral philosophy, it's just the background to whatever semi-solipsistic life of work they're planning on. It's like they are determined never to have Mom scold them or Dad tell them what to do ever again. They seem permanently wedded to their adolescent griefs and since broader learning and transformation might lead to self-examination, they eye it warily.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:12 (fifteen years ago)

They are more likely than the general public, and Republicans, to say that too much has been made of the problems facing black people.

Yup. Fucking idiots.

Mr. Que, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)

what happened to this thread

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)

America happened

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)

Hey, America happens

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:15 (fifteen years ago)

America: This Is Happening

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:16 (fifteen years ago)

What's happening to this thread is that the Tea Party is somehow directing debate in this country despite being fucking loons.

x-post Willfully ignorant in the "cut taxes but don't cut my benefits" sense. Or in the "the President is a secret Muslim socialist" sense. Or the "our country is descending into socialism" sense. Or the "HCR will kill us all" sense. Or the "keep gov't out of my medicare" sense. Or the "green is the new red" sense. And so on. It'd be one thing if the Tea Party were simply conservative, but there's an inchoate rage that poll picked up which leads to lots of this idealogical confusion and apparently clouds common sense and rational thinking. Like, Republicans can certainly be rational and wrong, but the visible wing of the Tea Party at least is totally irrational and scarily aimless.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:18 (fifteen years ago)

but but but it seems the tea party folks aren't saying all of those things, josh. they definitely aren't using the muslim line, or the green is the new red line, at least. they are just a disorganized bunch of angry white men (but who in this climate isn't angry) who are muscling for an issue to rally around as their worth and power diminish.

ampersand (remy bean), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:21 (fifteen years ago)

i was about to say that this kind of "b-school guys are selfish jocks who become tea party birthers!!!!" kind of talk is hilariously blinkered and useless

...but you are all aware that there is a running argument for the past couple days between spengler and michael ledeen and a few other people about, no joke, the precise degree to which barack obama's mother wanted to fuck foreign black men, and how this endangers this great nation?

i'll try to find links. hilarious stuff.

goole, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

i've known plenty of college-educated loons. and not a few loons w/ JDs -- i actually had a debate w/ a super-conservative attorney friend that i used to work w/, where my friend SERIOUSLY argued that the health care bill was unconstitutional. granted, JD-inspired looneytoonery can be really obtuse to those out of the loop -- screaming about the Takings Clause and whether the government relies on an overly expansive interpretation of the Commerce Clause isn't going to get the unwashed to the barricades -- but it does exist.

Getting My Volcano On (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

I blame Econ professors for Libertarians.

― Fetchboy, Thursday, April 15, 2010 10:55 AM (22 minutes ago) Bookmark

Many xps here, but not really. I spent two years majoring in undergrad economics, then switched majors but kept it as a minor. None of my profs espoused anything even close to a Randian worldview. Many of my classes those first two years were in math- and stats-heavy classes, which don't lend themselves well to ideology anyway; and when I took things like Urban Economics, Environmental Economics, etc., they concerned themselves more with effective planning, case studies and resource management than they did with shrugging Atlases.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)

x-post Maybe not the party line, per se, but for whatever reason the Tea Party (whatever that is, really) tends to attract these sort of fringe groups (who obviously feel kin with the old white crowd). Like, on one hand the Tea Party is all Libertarian "keep government out of my life!" but on the other hand they're like ill-informed armchair strict constitutionalist "we're a Christian nation and the country is moving away from that so we must bear arms to protect us from people that don't deserve the government's wasteful help!" It's a big leap from "government get out" to "the government is trying to get me," and the line dividing the two at these Tea Party protests is a vague one.

Does the Tea Party actually have a platform, other than "we're taxed too much?" As far as I can tell, and this is partially ratified by the poll results that most Tea Partiers vote Republicans in the end, is that the Tea Party is just a farther right wing version of Republicans, more fervently anti-tax (again, whatever that means) and more extreme on the culture wars front (a very sort of entitled wrong side of the Civil Rights movement mentality; no coincidence that the TPers were largely born in the '60s or earlier - the good ol' days, right?).

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

They're like very socially conservative nationalist Libertarians, basically, which is like a Molotov cocktail of contradictions.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)

I agree that it's a problem for the tea partiers to set the agenda for political debate, but the idea that it's mere ignorance that's the cause of tea party beliefs keeps this dynamic in motion. If you think "haha omg how can they be so dumb as to want to reduce or eliminate the US social safety net", then you're thinking it's obvious that we should have such a net; and so you don't think of how to convince anyone who isn't on board with the Dems re. the shape and extent of that safety net. It doesn't seem like something that needs to be made convincing. But it is something that needs to be made convincing! It's not obvious that poor people should be supported by a safety net on the coin of those more well-off. That's a moral view, a really strong moral view, and it's far from obvious that it's right---this is why progressives have had to fight so hard for so long.

But if it doesn't need to be made convincing, then what's there to debate besides lol teabaggers?

Euler, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

they definitely aren't using the muslim line, or the green is the new red line

Very conservative friend of mine, not a Tea Partier per se, def doesn't buy the Muslim line, is extremely pissed off about almost everything green-focused, from global warming to cap-and-trade to the govenment "pushing" hybrid vehicles. He sees it all as nanny-state-ism and intrinsically wrong for the USA.

I turn it up when I hear the banjo (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html?hpw

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

Which is all well and good, but they don't offer any alternatives. OK, lower taxes: to where? Shrink government: to what? Cut spending: how much?

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

but but but it seems the tea party folks aren't saying all of those things, josh. they definitely aren't using the muslim line, or the green is the new red line, at least. they are just a disorganized bunch of angry white men (but who in this climate isn't angry) who are muscling for an issue to rally around as their worth and power diminish.

And have been completely and utterly co-opted by the Republican party (at least on the national scale). Feel like while it may have started grass roots (or even LOL think tank roots) it is now just being used by old GOPers - the Palins and Armeys - to air their more extremist grievances. Thus, having the Tea Party look so batshit in public makes the Republicans look more sane by comparison for American moderates/independents.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

That's a moral view, a really strong moral view

There's also a very practical, pragmatic argument to be made for a social safety net - that having a healthy, educated, non-impoverished population costs the taxpayer less in the medium to long-term and reduces crime

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

Josh otm

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

seriously bored of Tea Party analysis sorry guys

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/04/15/hodge.non.taxpayers/index.html?hpt=C1

Can we talk about this instead and how insane it is?

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

Re. the practical argument: costing "the taxpayer" less in the longer term ≠ costing YOU less in the longer term. Ditto for crime: I can pay for my own security if it comes down to it.

The moral view just re-enters the practical argument in the form of a strong reading of "the common good".

Euler, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

x-post But the TP is driving terms of the national debate. It's hard to ignore them, really.

Anyway, it often seems like the economic issues are just strawmen, and that there's something more disturbing underlying the various unfocused TP beliefs. A return to old fashioned US small (Christian) government roots seems a tad disingenuous, given the various "expansions" of government that will inevitably have to vanish. Regardless, has the TP indicated it wants to be a third party yet, officially? Or is it happy on the fringe being coopted by Republicans who will take the fall if it all goes bad?

Anyway, I'm off to the local tax funded park to enjoy this nice day. Freedom!

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

they've just refined the "lucky duckies" argument from 8 years ago.

Getting My Volcano On (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

and to the extent that the lucky duckies don't have any "skin in the game" -- well, apparently it never seems to occur to those spouting that line wr2 the "non-taxpayers" is that people getting EITC credits and whatnot may not have any "skin in the game" for reasons that have nothing to do w/ how much they pay in taxes.

Getting My Volcano On (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

That article is just... baldly dishonest. It's hard to believe the Tax Foundation really is "non-partisan" if it employs people like that guy.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

Speaking of taxes, Jay Nordlinger proves once again his endless capacity for self-amusement:

A Tax Game [Jay Nordlinger]

In today’s Impromptus, I do some meditating, and grumping, on taxes. Not sure how that subject managed to come up. I relate a little memory from early college days. A conservative friend and I were paying taxes, something we had never done before. And we would imagine — just for fun — that our tax dollars were going to particular purposes. For example, we’d say, “My taxes are going to pay Elliott Abrams’s salary!” He was a young assistant secretary of state, damn smart, and a joy to watch on television. We’d see him on Crossfire occasionally. Or we’d say, “My taxes are going toward contra aid!” We said that because everyone around us thought the contras were diabolical.

What are your taxes going toward this year? Everybody, left, right, and center, can think of answers that make him shudder; and of answers that make him smile. Just a little game, is all — call it a psychological exercise. But taxes are still too high, too numerous, too burdensome, too complicated, too counterproductive — I could go on, but you may have tax returns to fill out.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)

you'd think it would be easily dispelled once the "lucky duckies" look at their paychecks -- they look at how much comes out of their paychecks for social security and medicare, not to mention how much sales tax they have to pay after they cash their paychecks (which is surely as much a form of "double taxation" as taxing corporate dividends is).

it's obv. rhetoric whose only natural appeal is to wealthy republicans. though this being america, there's no doubt some racist overtones (i.e., this is the bushie rhetorical equivalent of raygun's "welfare queen" horseshit.)

― Tad (llamasfur), Sunday, June 8, 2003 5:56 PM (6 years ago) Bookmark

i still stand by this post.

Getting My Volcano On (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)

Regardless, has the TP indicated it wants to be a third party yet, officially? Or is it happy on the fringe being coopted by Republicans who will take the fall if it all goes bad?

You should probably ask their high-priced speaker Sarah Palin. Practically all the higher-ups in the TP are ex-GOPers. Were there any real grass roots TP, no doubt Fox et al would simply ignore them in favor of this high profile, more lucrative TP.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:49 (fifteen years ago)

Good article about the "half the country pays no taxes" talking point - http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/business/economy/14leonhardt.html

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

though having had to deal w/ NJ's ridiculous property tax assessments since then ... and having had to pay an obscene tax bill for 2008 a year ago ... i am a little more sympathetic to folks being fed up w/ taxes than i used to be.

Getting My Volcano On (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

a better word for pooping is grumping

― i want to marry a pizza (gbx), Tuesday, June 16, 2009 12:59 PM

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

yessssssssssssssss

Mr. Que, Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)

lol, it's true

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

Re. the practical argument: costing "the taxpayer" less in the longer term ≠ costing YOU less in the longer term. Ditto for crime: I can pay for my own security if it comes down to it.

This brings to mind one other thing I loathe about Tea Baggers and American right-wingers, generally; they're so myopically American. Everything basically starts in the 1750's on teh East coast for them if they bother to study history seriously at all.

It's telling though, that in their libertarianism they don't want to let and wedges in to dilute their philosophy. Yes, there was a time before police forces and people had to fend for themselves. It's noteworthy than nowhere that isn't essentially a failed state follows that model.

There was also a time in European history where the military was essentially privatized. It didn't end up working too well.

"This is a Christian nation!" Yeah, well the reason the Founders put in the no religion thing was 'cause they remembered the wars of religion and how successful states like Massachusetts had been with a state religion.

I'm totally down with arguing the unsexy details w/economic liberals but to assume that we are either going to be extremely laissez-faire or socialist is either willfully stupid or lame campaign talking points more divorced from reality than usual.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 15 April 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

Question: what do you guys see as the likelihood of some prominent or future prominent Tea Partier actually being self-righteous enough to run on a separate Tea Party ticket in 2012? If they did, how much of the Republican vote do you think they'd strip off?

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

i just hope that the same divine, loltastic hand that leads Sary Palin to do so much bullshit leads her to heeding the voice of these pitiable rallies (and the voices in her head) to run. and i hope that the Right's tacticians are unable to talk her out of it, because i think that she's perfectly capable of stripping off 30-35% of the voters who would typically go GOP.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

i think a lot of folks sing her praises, but only a large minority BELIEVE

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

Question: what do you guys see as the likelihood of some prominent or future prominent Tea Partier actually being self-righteous enough to run on a separate Tea Party ticket in 2012? If they did, how much of the Republican vote do you think they'd strip off?

at best, the same percentage that Nader got in 2000. and the same pro/con-Nader rhetoric from those days would be repeated for a 2012 Tea Party candidate.

Getting My Volcano On (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

i hope that the Right's tacticians are unable to talk her out of it

if worse comes to worse, i think RNC money will talk and Sarah will listen

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

i think that she's perfectly capable of stripping off 30-35% of the voters

yeah this is a ridiculous proportion, it's gonna be closer to 0-1% a la Nader, unless she can somehow marshal financial resources as deep as Ross Perot's (which I think is also fantastically unlikely) - in which case she might get closer to his percentages. But no way will a third-party candidate get a third of the electorate. Not going to happen.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

Sorry, I was in a meeting. Reading the "non tax payers" BS makes me scream in my own head "TAXES AS A TOOL FOR SOCIAL POLICY WILL BE OUR UNDOING BUT YOU AND YOUR PARTY WANT TO SET SOCIAL POLICY BY FIAT? DIE DIE DIE" and so on.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:19 (fifteen years ago)

(Perot's highest percentage was still below 20% btw - and he had bottomless pockets to fund his campaign. Sarah will not.)

xp

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:19 (fifteen years ago)

yeah : /
xpost to tracer

yeah my post wasn't clear; i'm saying she could feasibly grab a third of folks who would vote GOP.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

the thing is, Sarah will basically demand people who support her contribute a bazillion dollars to her campaign, which they will, and then she will go out and buy herself a jewel-encrusted suit and a flock of emus

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:21 (fifteen years ago)

can't wait for the first emu to be nominated to the supreme court, when palin is supreme leader

Mr. Que, Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

each age gets the Caligula it deserves.

Getting My Volcano On (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

Koch Industries

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:24 (fifteen years ago)

This needs repeating: Palin's popularity with any portion of the electorate is inversely proportional to her cable news exposure.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:24 (fifteen years ago)

"My problem with Obama is that, so far, he hasn’t given wealthy white Republicans enough to be scared about."
Paul Butler

^OTM

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

why on Earth would anyone think a moderate Democrat would have policies that would terrify wealthy white Republicans

oh right, he's black, ergo he is meant to be literally or figuratively ravishing your irresistible white women

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

either that or ban viagra

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

obviously wr2 Obama there's the racial angle. but the wingnuts were all incensed about Clinton back in the 90s too, though he wasn't really all that scary to wealthy white Republicans either.

Getting My Volcano On (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

Obama marries America's white women in mass wedding, film at 11

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

This needs repeating: Palin's popularity with any portion of the electorate is inversely proportional to her cable news exposure.

Yep. Y'all saw this, right:

A preview for Mark Burnett and Sarah Palin’s TLC reality show was shown to ad buyers, and the reception was extremely poor, according to a report.

An anonymous Discovery Communications source told The Huffington Post that “the whole thing [was] comical” and “When the promo was over, people (employees and buyers) were rolling their eyes, snickering, and even laughing. People were laughing and it’s not even a comedy. No one took it seriously.” Thus, it will get “a crappy time slot” and “Bottom line everyone thought it was a new all time low for Discovery. My guess is the show is going to tank big time.”

That will thrill critics, such as Working Assets’ CREDO, which has started a petition that says, in part, “Sarah Palin’s anti-nature crusade as governor makes her extremely unsuitable to host a show in your lineup. I urge you to cancel the show before it airs.”

But cancellation may not be necessary: Considering that Sarah Palin’s recent Fox News Channel special got low ratings on Fox News, of all places, this could end up as a spectacular disaster for Discovery and its network TLC, as they’re paying between $6.4 and $9.6 million for eight episodes of the show.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

haha I hadn't heard about Palin's ratings on Fox

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

like the TP's, Sarah Palin's mass appeal and influence is wildly overstated. mostly everyone's talking about them because a) they're ridiculous/comical and b) 24-hr news cycle political reporting requires conflict, manufactured and blown out of proportion or otherwise.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

those ratings couldn't have happened to a nicer person

Mr. Que, Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

Her shows failing mean she is too 'real' for lamestream media obv. This is how she'll spin it, if it ends up that way.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

this stuff is all a sideshow. but as much as it derails the Republican political machinery, I think that's a good thing. Nixonian thing to do would be to deliberately provoke them to further heights of lunacy.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

Also this is really funny all these TP studies indicating that they want lower taxes, yet the big talking heads meme today is that half of people don't pay taxes anymore because of that damn Obama.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

it is amazing how when you google "sarah palin fox news channel ratings" you get all of the stories from January about how she was a ratings beast and all of these stories from last week about how she actually lost 10% of the normal viewership for that timeslot

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

xp Which Obama can do just by being himself. Next, these idiots are going to decide certain people are STEALING THEIR OXYGEN since AIR IS NOT SOSHALIST. That said, I am kind of depressed by the BBC coverage she seems to be getting on the back of rallies to 9000 or less. I'll be listening to the radio late and all of a sudden, SCREEEEEEEEECH.

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

she's like journalistic crack

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:51 (fifteen years ago)

and she will ruin your life

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:51 (fifteen years ago)

she got around 5K in Boston, but what is being left out is that about half of those people were booing her

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:51 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha

Mr. Que, Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

Sullivan says she's like *meth* today, had to check.

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

palin herself doesnt do so great, coverage of palin tends to do well tho. not sure why.

max, Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

because coverage of Palin has just enough of a filter on it to keep her vacuous acquisitiveness from radiating out of the television and stealing your furniture

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

sex thoughts?

Mr. Que, Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

Why would Palin steal my red leather couch?

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

sex couch?

Mr. Que, Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

Why does she steal half the things she does steal? The facts that it's there and she doesn't have it are usually enough.

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

I want her sofa – the one with the caribou pelt.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

because coverage of Palin has just enough of a filter on it to keep her vacuous acquisitiveness from radiating out of the television and stealing your furniture
--don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE)

Was in line at Quiznos reading this and actually LOLed.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

the chair, ruler, and glasses she stole from me:

http://www.keylargokey.com/sexy-naughty-cleavage-sarah-palin.jpg

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)

which ILXor did the cleavage she stole come from

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

YOUR MOM

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

palin herself doesnt do so great, coverage of palin tends to do well tho. not sure why.

I'm inclined to think, based on reading Sullivan and also on my own responses to her, that her real consumer constituancy is on the Left where we enjoy kicking her in the nads and that, in turn, feeds the anti-anti-Palin sentiment on the Right where they probably still want better leaders and candidates but feel like the pretty lady should be protected from the vicious librul scum.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

I'm inclined to think, based on reading Sullivan and also on my own responses to her, that her real consumer constituancy is on the Left where we enjoy kicking her in the nads and that, in turn, feeds the anti-anti-Palin sentiment on the Right where they probably still want better leaders and candidates but feel like the pretty lady should be protected from the vicious librul scum.

a number of conservative friends have essentially said this to me -- almost word-for-word -- whenever i've asked them their opinions about Palin.

Getting My Volcano On (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)

MW otm

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:15 (fifteen years ago)

a number of conservative friends have essentially said this to me -- almost word-for-word -- whenever i've asked them their opinions about Palin.

When one of our smarter political columnists at the student paper published a rote har-har kind of column about Palin, I chastised him for (a) repeating the conventional liberal wisdom (b) picking on an easy target (c) fanning conservative self-righteousness.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:17 (fifteen years ago)

RE: The 47% only pay taxes. In all the articles I read on this, none of them gives statistics on where those numbers lie along income amounts. It's just assumed it's all poor people because they are lazy moochers. Personally I made barely over 12k last year and ended up paying a chunk of change in federal income tax.

The only related statistic I read was by the Tax Foundation fella who mockingly said tax cuts help "the 'middle class'" and then a few paragraphs later stated the average household income it helped was 50k, which pretty much IS the dead-center middle class.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

i know that i am mostly familiar w/ northeastern Republicans, but the main thing that i hear from all of them that i know personally is that they aren't as enraptured w/ Sarah Palin as some liberals think they are (in fact, a lot of them have no illusions at all about what an embarrassing ignoramus she really is). but they also see her as a creature of the Dems' own making and, by gum, they aren't above standing up for her or at least getting some vicarious kicks from her schtick since it pisses off liberals so much.

Getting My Volcano On (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

would be funny to see how these ppl would react to here actually being in an important office if it didn't mean Sarah Palin would have to hold an important office

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)

"but i draw the line at watching her tv show"

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:25 (fifteen years ago)

I wouldn't vote for her if she's going to steal the office furniture.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:33 (fifteen years ago)

Related question: what do you guys think about bringing, say, children under ten to a political rally, dressing them in your candidate's T-shirt, etc?

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

probably cheaper than getting a babysitter

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

I think I finally figured out why I really loathed her from the beginning and it wasn't so much the content of her 'speeches' or her positions, but the fact that I think she's a cock-tease. She winks and panders and thinks I can't see her trying to manpulate me to her ends and I have always found that both reprehensible and terrribly stupid in a self-centered yetself-unaware way and mostly completely tedious.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

so you're saying she wants to manipulate you into her end?

Mr. Que, Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

Related question: what do you guys think about bringing, say, children under ten to a political rally, dressing them in your candidate's T-shirt, etc?

Family as basis of society, etc...

Ha ha, Shakey.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

well, i figured from the start that Palin's nomination was as much for the MILF factor as for anything else.

Getting My Volcano On (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 17:48 (fifteen years ago)

I can't imagine her Screeching Zing Banshee public speaking method is a significant part of her appeal. Talk about nails on a chalkboard...

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 15 April 2010 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

Sarah Palin is like the patron saint of the willfully ignorant. She appeals to people just like her but anyone with just an ounce of reason would never vote for her. All she can do is rally the folks who don't know what they're gathered for. She's got no position other than the Raise Sarah's Bottom Line platform.

And please, have at that last sentence. It's asking for it.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 April 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

She appeals to people just like her but anyone with just an ounce of reason would never vote for her.

We've been through this. Reason's got nuthin' to do with it.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 18:41 (fifteen years ago)

people support Sarah Palin for the same reason that they support Rush Limbaugh; it is deeply annoying

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Thursday, 15 April 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

We've been through this. Reason's got nuthin' to do with it.

yeah ideology is not a barometer of intelligence can we plz drop this canard k thx

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

so you're saying she wants to manipulate you into her end?

...

She's got no position other than the Raise Sarah's Bottom Line platform.

And please, have at that last sentence. It's asking for it.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:49 (fifteen years ago)

people support Sarah Palin for the same reason that they support Rush Limbaugh; it is deeply annoying
--don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE)

What's the liberal equivalent I wonder? Michael Moore? The Yippies? (those don't really work, I know...)

idm@hyperreal.org (lukas), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

there isn't necessarily a "liberal equivalent". tribalism and, i dunno, enjoyment of shit-talking are somewhat constant across human beings, but not bipartisan

goole, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

libs are too hand-wringing when it comes to Michael Moore for him to be a true liberal equivalent to limbaugh/beck/palin.

Getting My Volcano On (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

though this'll do in a pinch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYlZiWK2Iy8

Getting My Volcano On (Eisbaer), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

you could say that obama himself has the same kind of mythical, raw physical appeal to liberals that palin has for conservatives (tho the gender thing is complicated -- maybe HRC is a better comparison, heh)

but beyond that, there's no point trying to be fair. liberalism (or the Dems, more narrowly) have never had a figure as simultaneously powerful and unsuited to governance as sarah palin. there's also never been a commentator-entertainer with the power over a party institution as rush limbaugh. i don't even know who to go back to for a rough equivalent; horace greeley or some shit.

you can pick out an alan grayson or a maddow or whoever but i really don't think there's a comparison.

xp see the trouble is barney knows wtf he's doing and has been at it for years

goole, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

there's also never been a commentator-entertainer with the power over a party institution as rush limbaugh. i don't even know who to go back to for a rough equivalent;

Will Rogers

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

well I dunno how much power he had, not a lot probably

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

people support Sarah Palin for the same reason that they support Rush Limbaugh; it is deeply annoying

Liberal equivalent = Alan Grayson?

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

THERE'S NO SUBSTITUTE FOR RAW TALENT

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMaXx8gbAHM&feature=player_embedded

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

catchy, funky, forward-thinking. the voice of a new generation.

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

there's also never been a commentator-entertainer with the power over a party institution as rush limbaugh. i don't even know who to go back to for a rough equivalent; horace greeley or some shit.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Coughlin

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

to go waaaay back a ways I was thinking about the ironies of the right's flirtation with seditionist elements and then realized that we had completely skipped over one of the more glaring ironies, the right's obsession with Obama's association with Weatherman BILL AYERS. Again, it's okay to advocate overthrowing the gov't for some reasons, but not for others, depending on where you fall in the ideological spectrum...

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:33 (fifteen years ago)

the weathermen aren't notorious because they advocated overthrowing the government, they're notorious because of the bombs

iatee, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

um and you think those two are unrelated why...?

plotting to assassinate police officers, carrying guns to pres. appearances, forming militias - these things are at least roughly equivalent to the half-assed bombings (of largely unoccupied buildings, I feel compelled to point out) that the Weathermen engaged in.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)

I mean that guy carrying his licensed firearm to an Obama speech is pretty much doing the same exact thing the Black Panther Party did when they marched to Sacramento with their guns and uniforms

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)

(both actions also entirely legal btw)

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think they're 'roughly equivalent' because that stuff isn't as sensationalist. I hope they bomb some unoccupied buildings...can't imagine anything helping us more wacko right-wing terrorism being on the news every day.

iatee, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

more than*

iatee, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

you could say that obama himself has the same kind of mythical, raw physical appeal to liberals

waht

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think they're 'roughly equivalent' because that stuff isn't as sensationalist.

how about flying a plan into an IRS office. Or bombing the OK federal building.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

I'm proud liberals don't have a Ronald Reagan they can follow, mouths a-drool.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

plan = plane

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

how about flying a plan into an IRS office.

I dunno, for some reason people didn't seem to care about this one, maybe cause he didn't kill anyone

Or bombing the OK federal building.

yeah this one qualifies

iatee, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:51 (fifteen years ago)

When I think of left-of-center media icons in American 20th Century history (and this may *cough* stem from my own ideological predilections), I think of someone like Molly Ivins and Molly used emotion as opposed to cold, hard reason alone but there was never a disdain for reason provided it was wedded to compassion especially as expressed through humor. This makes me think of all the great right-wing humorists.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)

maybe cause he didn't kill anyone

didn't he?

goole, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)

I dunno, for some reason people didn't seem to care about this one, maybe cause he didn't kill anyone

Don't say that to Vernon Hunter's family.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:58 (fifteen years ago)

you could say that obama himself has the same kind of mythical, raw physical appeal to liberals

waht

― Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, April 15, 2010 3:45 PM (11 minutes ago) Bookmark

^^ i mean, you could say it, and someone could say 'waht' in response...

by "physical" i don't mean the sexy starbursts tongue wagging shit right wingers go for, i mean what the person em-bodies -- representation in the basest sense

goole, Thursday, 15 April 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

oh I guess he did? regardless I think if he had killed, say, 20 people, it would have had more life as a news story...I'd bet a good % of people out there don't even know it happened

iatee, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:02 (fifteen years ago)

yeah let's reduce domestic terrorism down to raw numbers--that's a good idea.

Mr. Que, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)

uh I'm simply talking about how the media reports on these things, not making a judgment on the seriousness of the event

iatee, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:08 (fifteen years ago)

my only point is that the right is just as likely to forgive Sarah Palin/Tea-Partiers' guilt-by-association with people like the Huttaree or IRS-plane-crash-guy as the left is to forgive Obama's guilt-by-association with Bill Ayers or whoever. the tactics of the individual seditionists/terrorists are completely immaterial. that's all. the end.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

They're like very socially conservative nationalist Libertarians, basically, which is like a Molotov cocktail of contradictions.

― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, April 15, 2010 11:31 AM (5 hours ago)

uh we just call these people neocons now

I Love Milf (k3vin k.), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:35 (fifteen years ago)

argh no we don't

goole, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:39 (fifteen years ago)

neocons are/were primarily about foreign policy/nat'l security fyi

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:40 (fifteen years ago)

otherwise unconcerned with domestic policy and stuff like social conservative values or right to privacy/bearing arms, etc.

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:41 (fifteen years ago)

the "tea party" thing has been totally muddled by GOP operatives, but it arose while bush was still president among ron paul types and the remnants of the paleo-cons. now it just seems to mean "really conservative with a misspelled placard", but the goldbugs, isolationists and black-helicopter types are really very different from the neoconservatives

goole, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

hang on, i thought the tea party thing started after Rick Sanchez made the bullshit comments on the air in Feb '09, which was from a different group than all the Ron Paul types had been making noise about the year before

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

rick santelli, i think you mean, and no, there was already anti-bailout protest from libertarians and paulites before then.

goole, Thursday, 15 April 2010 21:59 (fifteen years ago)

If true, depressing.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)

that seems utterly pointless, why pursue such a case?

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:32 (fifteen years ago)

Sendin' A Message imo

greenwald's column should just be retitled "If true, depressing"

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:34 (fifteen years ago)

x-post But it is a matter of reason, not intelligence. They're different things. Folks can not disagree with this or any president on specifics. But the general bent of people like Palin isn't not intelligent, not really. It's just totally unreasonable. Like, it's totally unreasonable to call Obama un-American, or socialist, or Muslim, or not born an American, or not a "real" American or whatever, because it goes against all common sense and proof. If Beck, Palin et al. argued based on facts I wonder how much traction they would get? It seems to me by setting the terms of debate based on unreasonable assumptions, lies etc. they more or less make it impossible to debate them. "The world is round? I don't believe you! Prove it!" How do you respond to that? Sort of brilliant, form a rhetorical standpoint, if ultimately childish/like.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:34 (fifteen years ago)

but the goldbugs, isolationists and black-helicopter types are really very different from the neoconservatives

― goole, Thursday, April 15, 2010 5:42 PM (51 minutes ago)

yeah but ^^these people do not seem to be the tea party base now, idk

I Love Milf (k3vin k.), Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:38 (fifteen years ago)

that seems utterly pointless, why pursue such a case?

― I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, April 15, 2010

greenwald covers this? lol ruling class?

neveragl story (zvookster), Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:45 (fifteen years ago)

no I meant what's the point of Obama doing it (and yeah rogermexico probably otm)

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 15 April 2010 22:48 (fifteen years ago)

A secret code will allow youngsters to have sex with prostitutes and then run them over and get their cash back

Gamers may soon be able to help reduce the United States' massive budget deficit.

In an effort to reduce the USA's $12.8 trillion federal budget deficit, President Barack Obama's fiscal commission co-chairman Erskine Bowles has asked Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer about creating a debt-reducing videogame, USA Today reports.

According to the report, the game would "enable anyone with a computer to take a stab at balancing the budget." Democratic Senator Bob Kerrey said the game could even "go viral."

"What you could get is support among the populace for the exceptionally unpopular things you need to do to solve this problem," added Kerry, who help release his own budget-reducing game called Budget Shadows for PC in 1994 as chairman of the Bipartisan Commission on Entitlement and Tax Reform.

biologically wrong (Z S), Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:43 (fifteen years ago)

Budget Shadows WAS awesome, tbh

biologically wrong (Z S), Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:43 (fifteen years ago)

I plan on balancing the budget by drastically cutting military spending.

I WIN!
http://i43.tinypic.com/2aakqh2.jpg

biologically wrong (Z S), Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:47 (fifteen years ago)

King's Quest and Monkey Island are always recommended as good adventure games, and I've played a few of each series, but they dont' do anything for me. Even when I figure out which pixel to click or which item to combine with another, there's no satisfaction. It's like doing your taxes correctly.

― Z S, Monday, March 31, 2008 6:53 PM Bookmark

take heed, erskine bowles

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:48 (fifteen years ago)

Look out behind you Obama, it's a three-headed monkey!

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 16 April 2010 00:12 (fifteen years ago)

Also, I snapped some crappy pictures of DC tea partiers (and TP merchandisers) on my lunch break today:

http://i39.tinypic.com/rh6ao2.jpg
http://i44.tinypic.com/25u3yqh.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/a0yona.jpg
http://i39.tinypic.com/x3s3d1.jpg
http://i43.tinypic.com/mkxh1w.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/16j9f6.jpg
http://i40.tinypic.com/148nf2x.jpg

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 16 April 2010 00:41 (fifteen years ago)

uh...disregard that first picture.

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 16 April 2010 00:42 (fifteen years ago)

http://i43.tinypic.com/30vbss6.jpg

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 16 April 2010 00:43 (fifteen years ago)

"The Americans Are Coming" maybe gets at a key point of tea-partierness - - they self-consciously identify as the "real" Americans "taking back" the country from some other group of fake Americans. This got stirred up a lot towards the flailing end of the McCain campaign and is sorta where Palin fits in, I think, it's sorta her whole schtick.

Whereas I think the loony-left types who got their own disproportionate and mocking media coverage in context of Seattle, or anti-war protests, rarely if ever had any notion that they were the secret majority suppressed by some conspiracy - - their self-concept is as outsiders, kooks, trouble-starters, or maybe more helpfully, prodding gadflies that would help others "wake up" or whatever.

Doctor Casino, Friday, 16 April 2010 01:08 (fifteen years ago)

btw, inclined to be really touched and pleased and excited by this Obama orders hospital visitation rights for gays, lesbians

Doctor Casino, Friday, 16 April 2010 04:11 (fifteen years ago)

uh...disregard that first picture.

looooooool

aerosmith live at the mohegan sun (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 16 April 2010 04:12 (fifteen years ago)

I mean frankly dudes I think its kinda useless to talk about Tea Party types in vast generalizations because--to speak in slightly less vast but hopefully for meaningful generalizations--we're kinda dealing with a few different kinds of people here:

-Paleocons who are genuine Ron Paul-style policy wonks. Most of the TP types I've encountered irl are of this stripe and they're really smart and don't hate Obama cause he's black--neither overtly nor "subtly"--and they think W was a fuckin disgrace. They're not assholes. They're strict constructionists and so in the Clarence Thomas sense have a totally valid line to trace themselves back to the Founders in that they're really digging on that whole "words in their original meaning" thing.

-Unideological 'regular people' who are genuinely pissed about the runup in gov spending and the expansion of federal control in lieu of local control. Most of these ppl aren't 'radicalized' in any particular direction yet, but it's like showing up your freshman year of school: you're gonna fall in with a crowd and take positions and get radicalized eventually, in the TP it just seems to me that if you start as 'joe the plumber' you eventually start talking about ending the Fed or..

-You fall in with the genuine batshit milita types and start talking about blowing up the Fed.

Based on my megascientific combo of half-read surveys and irl interaction I'd say the ratio here is something like 40/40/20. You can't fairly paint them all one way.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 16 April 2010 04:18 (fifteen years ago)

I feel like maybe I have made this post before

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 16 April 2010 04:19 (fifteen years ago)

first picture is supposed to be a bidet spraying a butt, btw, not sure if that's obvious outside of the context of the thread I accidentally cross-posted it from, but hopefully that will make it's presence somewhat more understandable/destroy the last ounce of any credibility I may have accidentally had left

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 16 April 2010 04:21 (fifteen years ago)

ITS not it's, darnit

Z_SCredibility(t+1) = Z_SCredibility(t) * 0.3

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 16 April 2010 04:23 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha i see what the creator of the image has done there

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 16 April 2010 04:23 (fifteen years ago)

I wish we could make that picture the ile board description

aerosmith live at the mohegan sun (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 16 April 2010 04:25 (fifteen years ago)

Dear Gott im Himmel what is that thing, that horrid thing upon the floor:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_mQPvKXw3U&feature=player_embedded

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Friday, 16 April 2010 07:10 (fifteen years ago)

the mind recoils in horror

Dan I., Friday, 16 April 2010 07:59 (fifteen years ago)

how bad could it really get for Democrats?
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2010/04/14/how_bad_could_2010_really_get_for_democrats_105152.html

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/images/wysiwyg_images/seanmap.gif

Jesus saved fewer people than my Savior Obama will (Dandy Don Weiner), Friday, 16 April 2010 10:59 (fifteen years ago)

That's after the first House election since HCR passed, in Florida, had the Democrat win by 27 points, right?

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 16 April 2010 11:04 (fifteen years ago)

Some news for gays and lesbians:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/16/us/politics/16webhosp.html?hp

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 April 2010 11:13 (fifteen years ago)

big HOOS totally OTM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 11:16 (fifteen years ago)

how bad is realclearpolitics really hoping 2010 will be for democrats?

max, Friday, 16 April 2010 11:21 (fifteen years ago)

lol max "damn liberalconservative media" rite

aerosmith live at the mohegan sun (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 16 April 2010 11:24 (fifteen years ago)

yep u got me

max, Friday, 16 April 2010 11:26 (fifteen years ago)

the thought that 20% of the teaparty idiots are antigovt militia types is somewhat less than the salutary

nakhchivan, Friday, 16 April 2010 11:30 (fifteen years ago)

-the

nakhchivan, Friday, 16 April 2010 11:30 (fifteen years ago)

good luck usa, really.

Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Friday, 16 April 2010 11:49 (fifteen years ago)

you forget that actual tea party people who show up to these protests number in the low thousands

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 11:51 (fifteen years ago)

"The Americans Are Coming" maybe gets at a key point of tea-partierness - - they self-consciously identify as the "real" Americans "taking back" the country from some other group of fake Americans. This got stirred up a lot towards the flailing end of the McCain campaign and is sorta where Palin fits in, I think, it's sorta her whole schtick.

this is, perhaps, the most irritating part of the GOP/tea party schtick for me, since the animus toward minority groups is bubbling so close to the surface. in a purely pragmatic, tactical sense, the slogan is a sly example of "dog whistle politics."

BHakaTS, i didn't see in your description of tea-partiers "racist republicans -- who are either disenchanted with their former party or seeking a newer, hipper version of it -- who crave a more aggressive way to respond to their preceived loss of control over the nation's politics and culture." i think this is a big part of it.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 16 April 2010 11:58 (fifteen years ago)

The implicit racist/natavist/whateverist tendencies that taint even the most "mild" TPers is what's disturbing. Sure, original words of the Constitution and all that, honor the wishes of the founders, right. But not only are strict Constitutionalists often full of shit or at least wildly inconsistent and idealogical - as if the original intent of the founders/writers is somehow obvious and universally easy to discern - but again, what are the sorts of rights and decisions that would be reversed given a bench full of Clarence Thomases or Scalias? Who would those changes affect first? Hint: probably not old white males. And this is the reasonable clump of the TPers per HOOS' anecdotal poll! What does the other 60% (!) want? Angry directionless malcontents plus angry armed malcontents equals ... ?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:04 (fifteen years ago)

is it so crazy to believe that there are racists everywhere you look in the united states, especially among white people who don't have much contact with minorities? and that this racism is not some unique token of the tea party movement??

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:07 (fifteen years ago)

Not wanting to pay for other people's food/housing/health care ≠ racism.

Euler, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:09 (fifteen years ago)

Not realizing that people have paid plenty for your survival in turn, no matter how rich you are now = ignorance.

show us on the doll where the hotdish was served (suzy), Friday, 16 April 2010 12:10 (fifteen years ago)

honor the wishes of the founders

is this accepted as a relevant political aim? by anyone taken seriously, i mean?

Jesse James Woods (darraghmac), Friday, 16 April 2010 12:11 (fifteen years ago)

Not wanting to pay for other people's food/housing/health care ≠ racism.

that's true, of course, but in reality there's quite a bit of overlap between the sides flanking your equals-sign.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 16 April 2010 12:12 (fifteen years ago)

just like there's overlap with racism and, i don't know model airplane enthusiasts.

the hump that much of the country has gotten over, but that these people haven't, is that all of us end up paying MORE for disadvantaged peoples' food/housing/health care if it comes on the back-end of a life of poverty, poor health and undereducation. and you pay for all this shit for their kids too usually. invest in health, invest in education, invest in job training, invest in housing, then these people get jobs, stay healthy, pay taxes and contribute to society. or maybe these so-called conservatives believe that a pound of cure is better than an ounce of prevention, i don't know.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:13 (fifteen years ago)

There is overlap, but as I keep saying, "magically" making people non-racist would not make them into progressives, or vice-versa. Didn't we talk about the racism of early 20th century American progressives earlier in this thread?

Euler, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:15 (fifteen years ago)

tracer: you really think the overlap between the sides of euler's equasion is no greater than the overlap between racists and airplane enthusiasts?

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 16 April 2010 12:15 (fifteen years ago)

i don't know, and i have no way of knowing. and neither do you. so what's the point?

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:17 (fifteen years ago)

My tea partier friends don't want to pay for food/housing/health care for poor Appalachians either. As always race and class mix up this discussion.

Euler, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:18 (fifteen years ago)

this is going to be a hard thing to talk about unless we make it clear what we mean by "racism"!

there is a fair amount of evidence that feelings about certain welfare programs are motivated by... ethnic tribalism. does that "count" as racism?

max, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:20 (fifteen years ago)

yes, race and class mix up in the discussion.

there's ways of knowing, or at least drawing reasonable conclusions, about the underlying beliefs of a group's members, e.g., poll responses; the rhetoric of the movements' most prominent leaders; discerning the messages embedded in their materials; observing the behavior of rank-and-file members.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 16 April 2010 12:22 (fifteen years ago)

ok so once you've calculated all this shit on your clipboard what are you going to do?

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:24 (fifteen years ago)

biting from yglesias biting from real political scientists:

As expected, ethnocentric whites are more likely to push for cuts in food stamps, to favor reductions in spending on welfare, to oppose increasing benefits to women on welfare if they have additional children, and to favor strict time limits on public assistance. Partisanship, egalitarianism, and limited government also contribute to opinion on welfare, and in the expected way. But with controls on partisanship and principles (and on benefits and all the rest), the effects of ethnocentrism are statistically significant and sizable in every case.

We are convinced that the positive effects of ethnocentrism on support for social insurance are real. We uncovered the same result—that ethnocentrism helps to build support for social insurance programs among white Americans—wherever we looked, and we looked in quite a few places. [...] When it comes to providing pensions and health care to the retired and elderly, ethnocentrism appears to be a force for liberalism, for a more generous welfare state.

http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2010/03/ethnocentrism-and-small-government-hypocrisy.php

max, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:27 (fifteen years ago)

do you ask the same question of sociologists and political theorists and economists, who find these materials valuable in analyzing messaging and policy? it's inherently useful information, to put political discussions into context, to draw lines between individual policy positions and broader ideology, to figure out what types of messages resonate with whom and why, to try and understand what it might take to persuade others that your views are correct (or at least reasonable), to see if common ground can be found between opposing sides (or to decide when it's better to not bother trying to find such common ground).

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 16 April 2010 12:28 (fifteen years ago)

sorry, tracer, i reread what i just wrote, and it sounded pissy. it's not the way i intended it to read.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 16 April 2010 12:29 (fifteen years ago)

Lots of trenchant (opinion) analysis here:

http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/what-tea-party-backers-want/

One analysis:

But the best evidence of their views about race is circumstantial — a set of racial signifiers and inconsistent views that turn out to be more revealing than what they actually say. This is how educated right-wing people talk about race in the age of Obama — by not talking about it.

Instead Tea Party supporters complain about too many taxes, though they think their own taxes are fair. They fuss about excess government spending but they support Social Security and Medicare. Overwhelmingly they believe that Barack Obama doesn’t share the needs and problems of people like them, or the values of “most Americans.” These code words have been around long enough, everybody gets them.

Another take:

This is not traditional racism, although there are almost certainly traditional racists within the movement.

So, yeah, it's not so cut and dry but it's there. And the fact remains that the sorts of programs TPers want cut or roll back are the sorts of programs that right now very much affect minorities in America, negatively. And the rights they want to expand likely disproportionately affect themselves, positively.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 16 April 2010 12:55 (fifteen years ago)

or maybe these so-called conservatives believe that a pound of cure is better than an ounce of prevention, i don't know.

if the "pound" is spent on prison then, yup!

goole, Friday, 16 April 2010 13:10 (fifteen years ago)

sorry Daniel i'm being pretty pissy too. pissy Friday!

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)

there has been this huge, gleeful game of "spot the racist" on lefty blogs and my question is what does it accomplish

- policy-wise
- politically

i would argue that politically it is kryptonite - it is a losing play. if we want to "try and understand what it might take to persuade others that your views are correct" one of the first steps is to stop calling people Big Fucking Racists.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 13:32 (fifteen years ago)

i agree with much of that, although i'm guilty of some "spot the racist" chortling, too. still, it seems to me there are some reasons to at least occasionally play "spot the racist" (so long as it doesn't go overboard and cause a needless and unproductive backlash).

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 16 April 2010 14:10 (fifteen years ago)

i would argue that politically it is kryptonite - it is a losing play. if we want to "try and understand what it might take to persuade others that your views are correct" one of the first steps is to stop calling people Big Fucking Racists.

nobody ever convinces anybody. rally the base, yo. it's entertainment for liberals.

goole, Friday, 16 April 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)

tracer you are ridiculously OTM imo

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Friday, 16 April 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)

but i don't know because the pleasures of being self-righteous are more immediate than, you know, the tactical benefits of trying to persuade ppl with opposing viewpoints.

elmo leonard (elmo argonaut), Friday, 16 April 2010 14:19 (fifteen years ago)

trying to persuade ppl with opposing viewpoints

97% overlap with 'self righteousness' right there tbh

just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Friday, 16 April 2010 14:25 (fifteen years ago)

but i don't know because the pleasures of being self-righteous are more immediate than, you know, the tactical benefits of trying to persuade ppl with opposing viewpoints.

A letter written to Jay Nordlinger:

Jay,

That letter brought back memories of my own experience in AP American history. My teacher, too, was a predictable anti-American ideologue who maintained his own rogues’ chorus to shout down thoughtful dialogue. Following the first exam, he thought to insult me by saying that he was tempted to play a recording of John Philip Sousa while reading my exam.

This teacher required us to read a horrid little screed by William Appleman Williams [oh, yeah] and utilize its arguments if we wished to pass the course and have any opportunity of taking the AP exam in history.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 16 April 2010 14:27 (fifteen years ago)

Tracer consistently OTM. Calling Tea Partiers racist doesn't accomplish anything except give the left a moral upper hand, and makes it even easier for TP's to hate the left for 'playing the race card'.

Not wanting to pay for other people's food/housing/health care ≠ racism.

I know, code words and all, right. But recent polls have shown that more than anything CLASS and EDUCATION are big driving factors in TP membership. If anything TPers are CLASSIST. The fact that most TPers are white males can be explained by the fact that most wealthier Americans are white males.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:15 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/04/dobbs-mania_explodes_over_manhattan.php?ref=fpblg

Late Update: Wow, turns out my wife happened upon the same hoe-down when she stopped by the central Post Office late this afternoon (that's at 31st & 8th). Apparently they had a special Tea Party band entertaining the crowd with songs about not giving way to slavery and socialism. "We're not your slaves" was apparently the chorus of the total rock out song.

WTF

Mr. Que, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:21 (fifteen years ago)

But NOT in a RACIST way

just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Friday, 16 April 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

is this all some crazily-misplaced guilt complex ish, with these crazy white dudes thinking the ancestors of slaves are coming to take their revenge in kind?

a rhetorical style that implies an unwritten "now taste my ass" (stevie), Friday, 16 April 2010 15:24 (fifteen years ago)

more like turn-the-tables-ism.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 16 April 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

People that connote paying taxes with slavery deserve to get pelted with eggs IMHO. It'd be my own example of free speech.

The bigger problem here is we live in a world where now even the Vatican has abused historic atrocities in the name of self-preservation.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51BMWYSS19L._SS500_.jpg

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

Has anyone interviewed a TPer with such a sign to ask their reasoning behind connoting slavery with paying taxes?

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

Again, we're in this age where no historical atrocity is sacred or safe from being drug out and sullied to defend a viewpoint, completely out of context, and with no respect whatsoever for the historical victims of said atrocity. So tired of it.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)

Everyone who's tried has died of boredom before filing a report

xpost

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)

Not wanting to pay for other people's food/housing/health care ≠ racism.

― Euler, Friday, April 16, 2010 8:09 AM (3 hours ago)

yeah as everyone else has said, it's not tantamount to KKK membership but fiscal conservatism is born out of turning a blind eye to centuries of socioeconomic disparities and pretty strong ethnocentrism, as max pointed out. tracer's right, it's not politically useful to use this argument in an open forum (racists tend to get defensive after being called racists), but it's also dishonest to dismiss it when we're just shootin' the shit here

I Love Milf (k3vin k.), Friday, 16 April 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

and i'm ready to stop talking about tea partiers now

I Love Milf (k3vin k.), Friday, 16 April 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

Yay!!

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

Seriously for a bunch of people who kinda might want to overthrow the government they are some boring motherfuckers.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

yeah sorry dudes for the TP lame-o linkage

Mr. Que, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

Where's the street theatre? The giant puppets??? Where's the be-ins and the elaborate pranks??

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

We should just have a rolling Tea Party thread and an unofficial ban on TP-related posts here. There are other, more valuable (but yeah, less newsworthy) third parties in the US that are actual third parties and not just fringe elements of the GOP, and don't get nearly the amount of discussion these idiots get.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

Hell, Flash mobs are more interesting.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

Adam I like your idea.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

We should just have a rolling Tea Party thread and an unofficial ban on TP-related posts here.

we had a rolling GOP/right wing crazy thread, but SOMEBODY closed it!

goole, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

I like the idea of JUST a tea party thread.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

slave 4 u - the rolling tea party

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

no

Mr. Que, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

I just like pointing out to TPers that they have representation and they're beginiing to sound like sore losers. As Tracer has pointed out they're not only ready to respond to the 'race card' but expect it, so when I simply point out that calling equating 'obamacare' to socialism to someone like me, who has lived in a 'socialist' country leaves me unimpressed with their understanding of socialism and equating themselves to slaves, when their taxes were likely just cut and they can vote anytime there's an election, sounds like whiny cant only tenuously related to reality.

I won't burden you anymore with such post on this thread

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 16 April 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

trying to picture crazy guys in lady liberty costumes protesting on E

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Friday, 16 April 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

air water fire dirt - fuckin taxes how do they work

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

I vote for TP-specific thread

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 April 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

TPers sounds funny.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 16 April 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

it's cool but I don't agree with "fiscal conservatism is born out of turning a blind eye to centuries of socioeconomic disparities and pretty strong ethnocentrism" because it makes it sound like fiscal, er, unconservativism, is the default when you have your eyes open. Like, why should I care about centuries of socioeconomic disparities? Shouldn't I just care about myself? Like, isn't that the default? Isn't that why we call it progressive when you try to oppose this? I mean it would be amazing if over the last 100 years the West suddenly became a place where the "natural" thing to do was to care for your neighbor as yourself. But that's not what's happened.

Euler, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

if the natural thing to do was to care for your neighbor as yourself then we wouldn't need social programs at all - which is the weird, hippy utopian premise of glenn beck et al's arguments against them (made in bad faith, but still)

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

I vote for TP-specific thread

― I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, April 16, 2010 10:42 AM (1 minute ago)

^^^^

millions now zinging will never lol (WmC), Friday, 16 April 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

right---but the point at stake as we consider strengthening our welfare state is whether we need social programs at all. My tea party friends insist that we don't. And I don't think their view is borne of racism or ethnocentrism or ignorance...it's borne out of greed and selfishness for sure, but we shouldn't be surprised that those motivations are with us and are strong---I suspect many of us feel them too.

Euler, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:49 (fifteen years ago)

The elephant in the room is that there are few 'real' fiscal conservatives in American national politics. There are incrementalists (in both directions), irresponsibles, and out-of-power Smith-fundamentalists thumping their gospel. Once you get to Congress, there are simply competing interests trying to fix the market for their own ends.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 16 April 2010 15:49 (fifteen years ago)

air water fire dirt - fuckin taxes how do they work

LOL

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)

yeah Euler - and i'm saying the way these guys justify their pig-headed, selfish stance morally to themselves (probably) (much of the time) is the utopian jesus-backed idea of individual charity and neighbor-loving (eww) - "a thousand points of light" drew on this too, and so does david cameron's "<a href="http://www.conservatives.com/News/News_stories/2010/03/Plans_announced_to_help_build_a_Big_Society.aspx";>big society</a>" - which i think explains a big part of how these guys hook into christendom

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

gah - big society - http://www.conservatives.com/News/News_stories/2010/03/Plans_announced_to_help_build_a_Big_Society.aspx

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

funny we're not even talking about financial reform very much. and frankly i haven't been following it very closely, and blogs haven't been writing about it with as much energy as they were about healthcare...

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/04/head-on-collision-republicans-threaten-to-block-debate-on-financial-reform.php

goole, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:54 (fifteen years ago)

the quality and degree of republican lying about the "dodd bill" has been even more shameless and near-autistic than about healthcare, imo!

goole, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

Big Society...

Wow, he actually name-drops Salinsky and Obama.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 16 April 2010 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

It's funny that national defense is the one thing WE MUST NOT DECREASE in our crusade of fiscal responsibility. Because that's a good chunk of my tax dollars being paid to protect hundreds of millions of Americans that I don't know personally - and probably never will - from terrorists! I don't profit from their physical safety! WTF?
j/k

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 16 April 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

It's not an especially original insight but I think it's helpful to see debates over the welfare state as debates over how to realize Christian values in our secular institutions---certainly the Progressives saw it this way and Obama continues to frame it as such.

Euler, Friday, 16 April 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

oh this is gonna be fun

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20100416/ts_ynews/ynews_ts1642

goole, Friday, 16 April 2010 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

whatever the motive for the attack, it's a terrible story.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 16 April 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

lol that is some shitty "journalism"

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 April 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

indeed!

really await the thorough following-up. and i love the update "lol we forgot to mention the part where cops said they didn't know for certain if dirty anarchists had beaten them for the sarah palin pins"

goole, Friday, 16 April 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

"...dirty" looking male with long auburn-colored hair styled in a ponytail."

OMG, aggro hippies!

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 16 April 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

amazing that some measure of heroism is coming out of blanche lincoln

goole, Friday, 16 April 2010 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/17/business/17goldman.html?hp

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Friday, 16 April 2010 16:19 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/04/16/obama.threat/index.html?hpt=T2

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 April 2010 16:19 (fifteen years ago)

yeah that's some heavy shit too

goole, Friday, 16 April 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

According to the complaint, Goldman created Abacus 2007-AC1 in February 2007, at the request of John A. Paulson, a prominent hedge fund manager who earned an estimated $3.7 billion in 2007 by correctly wagering that the housing bubble would burst.

Not related to Henry, believe it or not!

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 16 April 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

This Goldman story is coming at a good time to put pressure on the Senate to get some financial reform passed.

o. nate, Friday, 16 April 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

Among other things, (republicans) oppose the creation of a $50 billion fund, raised by imposing a fee on large financial institutions, that would cover the cost of winding down failed firms. Better, they say, to avoid the perception that any funds can be used to wind down institutions, and to let them fail.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 16 April 2010 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

The proposal by Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.), who chairs the Agriculture Committee, sent shudders through Wall Street. For nearly two decades, five U.S. banks -- J.P. Morgan Chase, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America and Citigroup -- have acted as middlemen, allowing commercial firms and financial speculators to trade vital goods such as oil, natural gas and cotton, as well as contracts called derivatives. These are essentially side bets on which way such commodities, stocks and other assets will move.

Under Lincoln's plan, as described by her aides, the companies would have to spin off that activity if they wanted to remain banks.

The proposal is tougher than what the administration has sought. The Senate bill, which largely reflects administration thinking, stops short of an outright ban on derivatives trading by the Wall Street companies. Lincoln's proposal, which her staff said is due out this week, could be added to that legislation.

Most of those articles are under the assumption that all republicans will vote against this and it won't be included, will lead to a watered-down bill, etc. Let's hope 'bipartisanship' doesn't end up screwing the American people again.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 16 April 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

amazing that some measure of heroism is coming out of blanche lincoln

― goole, Friday, April 16, 2010 12:18 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

the power of a primary challenge!

max, Friday, 16 April 2010 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

If Geithner would stop meeting with Robert Rubin (as politico noted he continues to do), and Dodd would show courage, and Axelrod would brief Obama, we could actually have a united front pushing for the Blanche Lincoln proposal. Alas, it is very unlikely to happen.

curmudgeon, Friday, 16 April 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

Trying to keep derivatives away from big banks is a total joke.

Jesus saved fewer people than my Savior Obama will (Dandy Don Weiner), Friday, 16 April 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

How about just stiffening, then enforcing, fraud protections and penalities? Maybe hire about 5000 new bank examiners to ride their sorry asses, and have the Inspector General jump down the throats of the SEC for criminal laxness during the eight years of Bush the Sequel: Pull My Finger?

Aimless, Friday, 16 April 2010 17:50 (fifteen years ago)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100416/ap_on_bi_ge/us_stimulus_nuclear_jobs

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 April 2010 17:58 (fifteen years ago)

is the aim or even the letter of proposed regulation to "keep derivatives away from big banks"??

anyway, today's fox outrage

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/15/oreilly-vs-coburn-the-vid_n_539478.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/16/bill-oreilly-defends-lie_n_540672.html

goole, Friday, 16 April 2010 18:13 (fifteen years ago)

1st vid is hilarious, couldn't bring myself to watch the 2nd

goole, Friday, 16 April 2010 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

lol these clowns

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 April 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/04/16/obama.threat/index.html?hpt=T2

― I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, April 16, 2010 11:19 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark

wait I thought jay nordlinger @ nro decided racism was over

bnw, Friday, 16 April 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

no, see, unless you are a guy exactly like that, actively plotting to kill obama and other black people, then you can't be a racist! that's racism! nothing else is!

goole, Friday, 16 April 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/15/oreilly-vs-coburn-the-vid_n_539478.html

holy shit, dennis miller totally channelling fred willard in A Mighty Wind there

a rhetorical style that implies an unwritten "now taste my ass" (stevie), Friday, 16 April 2010 18:41 (fifteen years ago)

last night i felt a little racist

she smacked me

Tracer Hand, Friday, 16 April 2010 18:44 (fifteen years ago)

Abstract
Does media bias affect voting? We address this question by looking at the entry of Fox
News in cable markets and its impact on voting. Between October 1996 and November
2000, the conservative Fox News Channel was introduced in the cable programming of 20
percent of US towns. Fox News availability in 2000 appears to be largely idiosyncratic.
Using a data set of voting data for 9,256 towns, we investigate if Republicans gained vote
share in towns where Fox News entered the cable market by the year 2000. We find a
significant effect of the introduction of Fox News on the vote share in Presidential elections
between 1996 and 2000. Republicans gain 0.4 to 0.7 percentage points in the towns which
broadcast Fox News. The results are robust to town-level controls, district and county
fixed effects, and alternative specifications. We also find a significant effect of Fox News on
Senate vote share and on voter turnout. Our estimates imply that Fox News convinced 3
to 8 percent of its viewers to vote Republican. We interpret the results in light of a simple
model of voter learning about media bias and about politician quality. The Fox News effect
could be a temporary learning effect for rational voters, or a permanent effect for voters
subject to non-rational persuasion.

http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~sdellavi/wp/foxvote06-03-30.pdf

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 16 April 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

Those 2 HuffPo clips upthread are more Fox News than I've watched in, like, ever, because I can't even look at O'Reilly or any of those other liars without wanting to punch them.

"We NEVER said that! Name one person who EVER said that!"

50 instances later...

"Oh, we said that THEN, but I was referring to some OTHER then!"

I turn it up when I hear the banjo (Dan Peterson), Friday, 16 April 2010 18:50 (fifteen years ago)

who kicked, i mean

goole, Friday, 16 April 2010 21:37 (fifteen years ago)

quel surprise

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 April 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

where is obamasupportersbeatmewoman.gif

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 April 2010 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, josh marshall goes there, but i don't think the comparison is apt -- two people really did get assaulted brutally by somebody, and it looks like the attribution to "leftists" has been done by third parties, not the victims themselves. jindal's own camp has denied they were wearing sarah palin pins.

goole, Friday, 16 April 2010 21:45 (fifteen years ago)

yeah that's true, this isn't outright fraud, more like misrepresentation.

altho I have often marvelled at that woman's capacity to punch herself in the face fwiw...

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 April 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

What's really sad is seeing the macho Right try to glom onto the 'we're victims too' line.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 16 April 2010 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

they do that all the time.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 16 April 2010 22:44 (fifteen years ago)

yeah America's being taken away from them dontchaknow

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 16 April 2010 22:48 (fifteen years ago)

so there's no doubt texas is the worst state now, right?

http://gawker.com/5518772/texas-city-brings-back-paddling-in-schools

mr. que surprise (k3vin k.), Saturday, 17 April 2010 05:05 (fifteen years ago)

electric chair for music pirates on school premises

lesley gorguts (latebloomer), Saturday, 17 April 2010 05:09 (fifteen years ago)

this still goes on in a lot of southern states

lesley gorguts (latebloomer), Saturday, 17 April 2010 05:11 (fifteen years ago)

so there's no doubt texas is the worst state now, right?

http://gawker.com/5518772/texas-city-brings-back-paddling-in-schools

― mr. que surprise (k3vin k.), Saturday, April 17, 2010 5:05 AM (17 minutes ago) Bookmark

rural texas is just as bad as mississippi alabama etc., but those states don't have San Antonio and Austin.

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 17 April 2010 05:24 (fifteen years ago)

BIG UP

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 17 April 2010 05:27 (fifteen years ago)

yeah texas has some real redeeming value

an actual jerk (J0rdan S.), Saturday, 17 April 2010 05:31 (fifteen years ago)

also like, even tho it often results in people being pure assholes, i think it's cool that ppl from texas are all ARGH I'M FROM TEXAS WHOO ARGH -- it's a pretty distinctive state even if it is ground zero for some real horseshit politics

an actual jerk (J0rdan S.), Saturday, 17 April 2010 05:32 (fifteen years ago)

I'M FROM TEXAS WHOO ARGH

i think u just captured my whole identity right there

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 17 April 2010 05:33 (fifteen years ago)

Except for Newcomers in Long Island, which specializes in what you'd expect it to, that is, recent arrivals to the US, Dallas had the only high school in the top ten last year whose demographics roughly matched that of the local population. Dallas has a large and longstanding middle class black population, too, but I don't think that tempers the accomplishment too much, because if you look at some of the other schools, like the number one school, Thomas Jefferson in Alexandria, comparing the populations of the school versus the town looks scandalous for both (I think TJHS has about 1 or 1.5% black students compared to about 21% in the city of Alexandria).

bamcquern, Saturday, 17 April 2010 05:42 (fifteen years ago)

plus Cheaters is filmed in Dallas. You're welcome, America.

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 17 April 2010 05:44 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/linda-r-monk-jd/elana-kagan-as-the-next-e_b_538130.html

ok this is easily the dumbest thing i've read this week (my own fault for reading the huffington post, i know). this is like someone telling you that a baseball player with a .320 OBP is actually good because he leads the league in 9th innning RBI

mr. que surprise (k3vin k.), Sunday, 18 April 2010 04:26 (fifteen years ago)

i realize this was discussed extensively here on friday, but -- without further comment -- i'll link to today's nyt column from frank rich, discussing race and modern politics.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 18 April 2010 17:18 (fifteen years ago)

oh yeah, lol Goldman Sachs

When we was in the shower, your buttcheeks was warm (Eisbaer), Sunday, 18 April 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

fascinated by that civil complaint. unravelling the broader scheme is worthy of a thread in itself.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 18 April 2010 17:34 (fifteen years ago)

i'm liking the conversations on several blogs as to whether this is Obama finally showing some balls wr2 Goldman Sachs and the worst Wall Street miscreants, or if it's just going to be a set-up for another finger-waving exercise (i.e., Obama et. al. get all kinds of pissed off, Goldman Sachs pays a fine of some sort of fine early on and spares itself the embarrassment of all sorts of juicy tidbits about its operations and personnel getting out to the larger world via discovery [a la Tyco & Kozlowski]).

When we was in the shower, your buttcheeks was warm (Eisbaer), Sunday, 18 April 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

not to mention that Brad DeLong has it absolutely right wr2 John Paulson's role in this mess. i just hope that John Paulson doesn't get crucified b/c, as far as i can tell from info available to date, HE didn't do anything wrong.

When we was in the shower, your buttcheeks was warm (Eisbaer), Sunday, 18 April 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

i'm guessing obama will be genuinely tough on this issue. there's little reason for him to compromise, and moderating his position isn't even politically advantageous (he'll be thrilled being the populist president for a while).

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 18 April 2010 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

i hope that you're right, Daniel.

as to my earlier post: unless there's evidence that John Paulson acted as a co-conspirator (or something like that), and i don't necessarily see any evidence of that right now, then i hope that the SEC keeps their "eye on the prize" (i.e., Goldman Sachs).

When we was in the shower, your buttcheeks was warm (Eisbaer), Sunday, 18 April 2010 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

i think that all of this may belong in the shitbin economy thread, anyway ... as fascinating as it is to econ/finance geeks.

When we was in the shower, your buttcheeks was warm (Eisbaer), Sunday, 18 April 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

oh, i'm sure the SEC/DOJ will be focused on Goldman Sachs for a while. that's a heck of a civil compl.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 18 April 2010 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

Is it naive to think that the fate of the Goldman Sachs case is tied to the fate of the financial reform bill?

Euler, Sunday, 18 April 2010 19:01 (fifteen years ago)

unrelated, at least in one direction (if the bill fails, the civil suit will go forward anyway). OTOH, the lawsuit will definitely be used to generate support for the financial reform bill.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 18 April 2010 19:02 (fifteen years ago)

I guess I'm asking how independent the SEC is from the executive branch.

Euler, Sunday, 18 April 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

nice knowing you guys

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/04/18/us.iran/index.html?hpt=T1

mr. que surprise (k3vin k.), Monday, 19 April 2010 05:10 (fifteen years ago)

i'm guessing obama will be genuinely tough on this issue. there's little reason for him to compromise, and moderating his position isn't even politically advantageous (he'll be thrilled being the populist president for a while).

― Daniel, Esq., Sunday, April 18, 2010 6

This seems like wishful thinking to me. I was just reading this weekend about the top staffers involved in financial reform issues and one of them was earlier in his career mentored by Democratic deregulationist and former Goldman-Sachser Robert Rubin. That advisor, like Obama himself, is gonna push a more moderate approach. Geithner, who as politico has documented still talks with Rubin regularly, has already rolled his eyes regarding the tougher language concerning derivatives.

curmudgeon, Monday, 19 April 2010 13:08 (fifteen years ago)

Plus, the mainstream media is already playing into the Republican Luntz playbook on this issue--focussing simply on whether taxpayers will be responsible for a next bailout, rather than on what causes the problems and how to prevent them. I got so annoyed watching that knucklehead Meet the Press host on Sunday repeating Republican talking points.

curmudgeon, Monday, 19 April 2010 13:12 (fifteen years ago)

to be accurate, when frank luntz speaks he's not "repeating" GOP talking points

goole, Monday, 19 April 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)

I didn't say Luntz was "repeating", I said the Meet the Press host David Gregory was repeating them. Luntz generates the memos and his client, the Republicans, and the lazy media repeat what he Luntz says. Republicans stay on message.

curmudgeon, Monday, 19 April 2010 15:17 (fifteen years ago)

Some sloppy grammar though from me made that confusing.

curmudgeon, Monday, 19 April 2010 15:19 (fifteen years ago)

ha ok, i misread the sentence about Gregory; i was just riffing on the talking points data pathway, which runs from Luntz to GOP, not the other way around...

joeks bruv!

goole, Monday, 19 April 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)

i realize he's a rather crucial impediment to honest discourse in this country, but damn what an awesome & enviable career Luntz has managed to carve out for himself

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Monday, 19 April 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

politics gets much easier once you've given yourself permission to lie

goole, Monday, 19 April 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

My wife's a professor of rhetoric and composition and she loves Luntz for how he does what he does. We joke about how if she ever totally sells out she's gonna follow his lead.

joygoat, Monday, 19 April 2010 15:44 (fifteen years ago)

From what I've read, it seems like the bill ISN'T tough enough though, which is funnily the same claim Republicans are making (??).

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 19 April 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

coulda put this on a bunch of difft threads, but i'll put it here

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/bcherry/2010/04/18/remember-the-maines-is-miley-cyrus-the-next-leftist-trojan-horse-into-country-music/

goole, Monday, 19 April 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

most amusing!

goole, Monday, 19 April 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

article by Brian Cherry:

Brian is a contract and freelance writer who has written for a number of Fortune 500 companies. His work has also appeared in the World Poker Tour Magazine, Classic Rock Magazine, The Detroit Free Press, and on a score of websites.

Aimless, Monday, 19 April 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

I love the quotation from noted country music expert Jeff Foxworthy.

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Monday, 19 April 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

also lol: http://laughingsquid.com/san-franciscos-answer-to-westboro-baptist-church/

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Monday, 19 April 2010 19:22 (fifteen years ago)

see also:

http://laughingsquid.com/the-real-boston-tea-party-a-polite-response-to-teabaggers/

I like the signs

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Monday, 19 April 2010 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

Their clothes are silly and I think they're a bit "look at me! look at me!" but so help me, that's just adorable. All of the sign slogans are awesomely pointed.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 19 April 2010 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

Their clothes are silly and I think they're a bit "look at me! look at me!"

which ones now?

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Monday, 19 April 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

The Twee-est Little Teapartiers.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 19 April 2010 19:35 (fifteen years ago)

That is preening attention-seeking I can 100% endorse.

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Monday, 19 April 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

kthx have to take back gracious decorum now bi!

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 19 April 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

?

I am not sure how you meant that but I was agreeing with you

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Monday, 19 April 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

No, that's what I mean! Anyway, looking through the larger set, there are also counter-protesters holding signs that say "God Hates Flags" and "Look at My Cool Sign", which I'm also enjoying.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 19 April 2010 19:40 (fifteen years ago)

"I Hate Taxes and Government so I'm Moving to Somalia" = okay excuse me for not watching the news (maybe) but that's just nice to see.

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Monday, 19 April 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

They held the anti-/mad tea parties around the country i think, and there was one in portland too.

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Monday, 19 April 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

"I Hate Taxes and Government so I'm Moving to Somalia"

Ha ha!

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Monday, 19 April 2010 19:49 (fifteen years ago)

Lizz Winstead's name for Michelle Bachmann: "Biggie Smallminded"

http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2010/04/michele_bachman_79.php

Michele Bachmann claims Bill Clinton's trying to "take her out"

By Kevin Hoffman, Monday, Apr. 19 2010 @ 9:15AMComments (6)

​Congresswoman Michele Bachmann suffers from a very unusual form of persecution complex: she imagines the entire Democratic party as an L.A.-style street gang that has her in their cross-hairs.

First she attracted attention for calling the Obama Administration a "gangster government." Now she's claiming that President Bill Clinton is trying to "take her out."

"Because I'm using a statement like 'gangster,' I'm responsible for creating the climate of hate that could lead to another Timothy McVeigh and another Oklahoma City bombing," Bachmann says in the clip below, adding: "I'm in my second term as a Congresswoman and the former president of the United States decides I'm important enough to take me out!"

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Monday, 19 April 2010 19:57 (fifteen years ago)

my people, makin me proud I gotta say

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 19 April 2010 19:58 (fifteen years ago)

xp

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 19 April 2010 19:58 (fifteen years ago)

that article positing Miley as an Enemy of the Party is astounding.

Similarly as astounding as the author's headshot:

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/files/userphoto/2598.jpg

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Monday, 19 April 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

wait is he saying Miley's a Jew? he's saying Miley's a Jew, isn't he?

While she is often portrayed as a Christian, and her relationship with God is between her and the Almighty, the objective evidence suggests that her brand of Christianity is the sort that got King David and Bathsheba in such hot water.

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Monday, 19 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

more like skankianity amirite fellas

goole, Monday, 19 April 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

This morning I decided from now on whenever my news feed lists a story with Sarah Palin in the title or description, to just not read altogether, and I encourage anyone else who feels like me to do the same. I have two dozen or so feeds I check throughout the day and more often than not spend way too much time reading about something stupid, superficial, and unproductive she said, and it's contribution nothing but wasting my time. Maybe if enough people do the same, and her page view share drops, we can get at least online media to stop paying attention to her.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 19 April 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)

holy douche. srsly, do run-of-the-mill lefty blogs sound as fatuous as this nitwit?

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Monday, 19 April 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

(re the Miley bit)

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Monday, 19 April 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

guys let's all take some time to marvel at this picture of mitch mcconnell

http://images.politico.com/global/news/100419_reid_mcconnell_ap_32.jpg

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 19 April 2010 20:33 (fifteen years ago)

http://aquafornia.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/ugly-fish.jpg

I won't vote for you unless you acknowledge my magic pony (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 19 April 2010 20:33 (fifteen years ago)

Every time I see that quote I cringe because I misspoke when I wrote that; it should have been "I won't vote for your candidate unless YOU make him acknowledge my magic pony" because obv you shouldn't vote for someone if you don't believe they are supporting your beliefs.

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Monday, 19 April 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

at the risk of just reposting every damn greenwald column, he's making me fall in love with this diane wood lady

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/04/19/wood/index.html

k3vin k., Monday, 19 April 2010 21:08 (fifteen years ago)

i kinda assumed a let's say stereotypical picture of haley barbour w/o much thought

http://www.newsweek.com/id/228841

turns out it's all true. just read the 1st paragraph.

goole, Monday, 19 April 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

He's a traitorous cur.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Monday, 19 April 2010 21:19 (fifteen years ago)

Greenwald makes the case for Diane Wood. I just printed her law review article.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 April 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)

al, do you even read this thread

max, Monday, 19 April 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

Um, k3vin just posted that. Just sayin'

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Monday, 19 April 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

(He's excited, max. It's cool.)

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Monday, 19 April 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

I was too busy burning my eyes out for the cause of liberty.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 19 April 2010 21:29 (fifteen years ago)

;)

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Monday, 19 April 2010 21:32 (fifteen years ago)

re Barbour, I just don't think America's ready for a Suet-American president.

millions now zinging will never lol (WmC), Monday, 19 April 2010 21:40 (fifteen years ago)

no hard feelings, it really should be reposted as many times as possible

my two percent's worth (k3vin k.), Monday, 19 April 2010 22:07 (fifteen years ago)

brace yourselves

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ynews/20100419/ts_ynews/ynews_ts1670

"On television, through partners including Comcast, RightNetwork delivers programming on demand that enables our audience to watch what they want, when they want," it reads, noting that the lineup will focus on "entertainment with Pro-America, Pro-Business, Pro-Military sensibilities."

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 02:23 (fifteen years ago)

JingoVision

millions now zinging will never lol (WmC), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 02:29 (fifteen years ago)

TV choices for me: Comcast (Ed Snider/various rightwing assholes) or DirecTV (Rupert Murdoch/various rightwing assholes).

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 02:32 (fifteen years ago)

oh shit, murdoch sold DirecTV, it's all good.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 02:34 (fifteen years ago)

Alright I just skimmed Greenwald's article making the case for Wood and maybe I missed it, but does he ever address that she apparently issued some abortion-related decisions that I am sure will scare Obama away from choosing her?

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)

why would abortion-related decisions scare obama away from wood

max, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

^^^there's a crass joke set-up in there somewhere...

Dr. Morbius' Moist Deployment (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

lol

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

I think he did address it, said that they were misleading, and provided a link? But I read it in a hurry last night so not sure....

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

why would abortion-related decisions scare obama away from wood

― max, Tuesday, April 20, 2010

Obama may want a pro-choice justice but a moderate like him does not want a justice who has offered her pro-choice legal interpretations in a straightforward manner that will make that area the only subject of discussion.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/185952.php

Files the Times obtained from conservative groups show that they would aim to portray Wood "as an abortion-rights extremist who is hostile to Christians." If Kagan is nominated, conservatives likely will "accuse her of subordinating national security to a gay rights agenda," the Times reports (Savage, New York Times, 4/17).

Specifically, social conservatives criticize Wood's opinions against a ban on abortion late in pregnancy and an Indiana law requiring a waiting period for women seeking abortions.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 15:49 (fifteen years ago)

my instinct is that "abortion" is a better hill to die on in '10 than "gay rights". not to sound jaded, but abortion as a hot-button thing seems like kind of a throwback...

plus the real anti-abortion footsoldiers are the catholic hierarchy and they are running low on moral authority atm. just spitballin here. go wood!

goole, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)

but it's true, it doesn't matter who gets picked, they'll dig up something and make up a bunch of nicknames and NR will have a cover making fun of her and there will be obnoxious ugly hearings and the whole thing will make you hate america, just like every other supreme nom fight

goole, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

yippee!!!

max, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

George Will hinted darkly last week that abortion likely won't come up at the Senate hearings. I guess he's hearing the dish at Cokie's Sunday brunches.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 16:02 (fifteen years ago)

this is going to pass and it is going to be bad for the Republicans

polling for Dems may suck at the moment, but if they get this through before the election and the economy continues to improve they are gonna have plenty of ammo to beat back Republican electoral gains

Dr. Morbius' Moist Deployment (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

Obama could nominate George W Bush and the republicans would fillibuster.

mayor jingleberries, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

yup

Dr. Morbius' Moist Deployment (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

Alright I just skimmed Greenwald's article making the case for Wood and maybe I missed it, but does he ever address that she apparently issued some abortion-related decisions that I am sure will scare Obama away from choosing her?

― curmudgeon, Tuesday, April 20, 2010 11:31 AM (1 hour ago)

http://www.slate.com/id/2250581/

also just to make sure you're not misreading greenwald's thesis (like uh, everyone itt did a week ago), his point isn't that wood is obviously the best choice for OBAMA, but that as a progressive you should not settle for kagan when there are much better choices out there, a few with a chance of actually being nominated, like wood

my two percent's worth (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 17:33 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, no one in this thread misread his thesis on the Kagan article. A bunch of us were of the opinion that half of his thesis was entirely unnecessary ranting based on what is available in the public record and that that diluted the actual, powerful part of his thesis, which is that there isn't enough on the public record to adequately judge Kagan for the position.

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

x-post to kevin

But the Emily Bazelon article you linked to makes clear that for Obama to nominate Wood he/the Dems will have to respond to the charges against Wood and I think her first paragraph says what Obama is likely to do instead:

The president doesn't want a fight. The Republicans don't really, either. So it's safe to predict that there will be what looks like a fight, but in the end the nominee will take his or her seat unscathed. That about sums up the chatter about the confirmation process for Obama's choice to replace Justice John Paul Stevens. It all points to the nomination of either the unobjectionable Judge Merrick Garland of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals or Solicitor General Elena Kagan, shortlisters who have hung out with Democrats their whole professional lives without marking themselves unmistakably as liberals. More marked, and thus less likely to be Obama's choice, is Judge Diane Wood, of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, who has actually played the part of the sort of liberal judge the president should want to appoint.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/04/ga-lawmakers-hear-testimony-from-woman-claiming-dod-implanted-a-microchip-inside-her.php

today's 'nixonland in real time' tidbit from tpm

goole, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

uh

don't you steal my Sunstein (HI DERE), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

my instinct is that "abortion" is a better hill to die on in '10 than "gay rights".

goole otm

Aimless, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I mean we could play democratic strategist or we could discuss who is the best nominee

my two percent's worth (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)

xps

my two percent's worth (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

or we could do both?

goole, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

the idea that the GOP will say whatever crazy bullshit they feel like saying is an argument in favor of picking the best person, regardless of the politics. the politics are the same for all the choices! shitty!

it is a matter, tho, of which pick the senate dems will feel like going on record defending. i don't know if i want to think about that too much tbh.

goole, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:36 (fifteen years ago)

If they pick that woman from Atlanta, I'm likely to vote 3rd party for every candidate in the midterm elections except Capuano.

This microchip was put in my vaginal-rectum area (HI DERE), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

"Ma'am, did you say you have a microchip?" state Rep. Tom Weldon (R) asked the woman.

"Yes, I do. This microchip was put in my vaginal-rectum area," she replied.

No one laughed. State Rep. Wendell Willard (R), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, asked her who had implanted the chip.

"The Department of Defense," she said.

Willard thanked the woman for her input, and the committee later approved the bill.

max, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

sounds like she would fit right in as a Republican Rep.

Dr. Morbius' Moist Deployment (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

x-post-- to K3vin

I think Wood, Koh, and Karlan are the best choices and I do not think Obama will pick any of them. I also like Walter Dellinger who was acting solicitor general under Clinton but is apparently considered too old.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:50 (fifteen years ago)

wait wait wait max where is that from

aerosmith live at the mohegan sun (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:55 (fifteen years ago)

oh wait got it sorry

aerosmith live at the mohegan sun (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:55 (fifteen years ago)

That lady wasted a valuable and rare chance to use the word "anogenital."

kissogram powers (Abbott), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:56 (fifteen years ago)

My anogenital microchip brings all the boys to the yard
And they're like "it's better than yours"

This microchip was put in my vaginal-rectum area (HI DERE), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

yeah no oldies pls

xxxposts

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

Man all you have to do to get Dan to change his user name is to find a novel way to employ the word vagina.

kissogram powers (Abbott), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)

the one made of words

kissogram powers (Abbott), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)

Dan...find...way to...vagina

aerosmith live at the mohegan sun (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)

i could teach you, but i'd have to kill you

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)

Man all you have to do to get Dan to change his user name is to find a novel way to employ the word vagina.

lol where is the truth bomb thread again?

This microchip was put in my vaginal-rectum area (HI DERE), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 19:06 (fifteen years ago)

lol where is the truth bomb thread again?

in the vagina iirc

aerosmith live at the mohegan sun (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 19:13 (fifteen years ago)

There is little question that Mitch McConnell is directly doing Wall Street's bidding by demonizing the liquidation fund. But what's surprising -- and disturbing -- is how quickly the White House made it clear that it didn't consider the fund a priority. According to the moderate Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told her on Monday that the fund was not an administration priority.

Geithner's promise, reports Politico, riled Senate Democrats, who are probably wondering why the White House is ready to make concessions so quickly, if it really does have the Republicans in a "head lock." Majority Leader Harry Reid is talking tough, but if the Democrats are looking to carve off a few Republican votes, avenue No. 1 -- killing the liquidation fund -- appears wide open.

Let's recap: As the first skirmish in the battle over banking reform finally unfolds, the Republicans launch an all-out attack on an aspect of the bill that Wall Street considers especially repugnant. And the White House folds, immediately. This does not augur well for the struggle over derivatives reform, due to take center stage on Wednesday.

http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2010/04/20/banking_reform_first_battle/index.html

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

my instinct is that "abortion" is a better hill to die on in '10 than "gay rights"

a hill covered with dead babies.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

Still better than a million flaming queens marrying tortoises in a Turkish bath.

Aimless, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/04/kenya-to-host-real-tea-party-on-capitol-hill.php

kind of smh, mostly lol

goole, Tuesday, 20 April 2010 22:17 (fifteen years ago)

No, mostly bwahahahaha.

yes we kenya (suzy), Tuesday, 20 April 2010 23:23 (fifteen years ago)

Jesus Christ.

California State Senator Leland Yee, who has been battling a state university over disclosing Sarah Palin's speaking contract, complains in a press release today that he's been getting nasty emails and faxes.

They include a fax with some really scatological, racist language and "a graphic of an American flag adorned pickup truck dragging a noose. The (very graphic) emails and fax are after the jump.

“It is quite disturbing that such racist and homophobic sentiment still exists in our country,” said Yee, who said he's forwarded the messages to the State Senate's sergeant-at-arms for investigation. “It is unfortunate acts like these that demonstrate why we must continue to be vigilant against hate and intolerance.”

From Yee's press release:

An expletive-laden fax received yesterday in the Senator’s San Francisco and Sacramento offices says, “To: JoBama Rectum Sniffer Fish Head Leland Yee” and then in all capital letters, “WERE YOU TO EXTRACT YOUR HEAD FROM TREASONOUS MARXIST NIG**R HUSSEIN OBAMA’S RECTUM, YOUR BRAIN WOULD STILL FUNCTION AT ITS PRESENT MUCH DIMINISHED LEVEL BUT AT LEAST THE NIG**R SH*T SMELL WOULD EVENTUALLY DISSIPATE.”

The fax, which included a graphic of an American flag adorned pickup truck dragging a noose, also states “FIGHTING The Marxist Nig**r Thug Hussein Obama” and “Safeguard the Constitution, Death of all Domestic Marxists!”

Another fax received by the Senator’s office with a similar graphic says, “NEW WEBSITE COMING SOON: lyeesucksobamasnig**ras*.com,” as well as “JoBama. HE IS BRAVE ENOUGH TO KILL OUR UNBORN, JUST NOT BRAVE ENOUGH TO CALL OUR ENEMIES WHAT THEY ARE: Muslim Terrorists!” The fax also includes a rifle scope targeting a shirt with the communist hammer and sickle symbol.

One of the phone messages left after hours in Yee’s office voicemail says, “You know, I heard that Senator Yee wants to nix Sarah Palin from speaking at Stanislaus State…Maybe we ought to have a homosexual with a long enough di*k to where he can stick it up his as* and fu*k himself while he is on stage giving a speech. That would be acceptable to Leland Yee. So, good thing you run in San Francisco ‘cause you’d never make it anywhere else.”

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 00:46 (fifteen years ago)

bless

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 00:56 (fifteen years ago)

Immigration groups demand Lindsey Graham admit he's gay.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 02:23 (fifteen years ago)

GOP opposes all significant legislation from Democrats en masse. GOP refuses to cooperate in the legislative process or accept any sort of compromise. GOP barely bothers to hide the intention to oppose all Dem legislation no matter what, and is some cases proudly proclaims it. Dems occasionally grow a pair and push something without any GOP support. GOP campaigns on the idea that Dems are steamrolling through legislation without attempting to work with GOP.

huh.

biologically wrong (Z S), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 02:48 (fifteen years ago)

gotta be completely disgustedlove it

Nhex, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 03:18 (fifteen years ago)

Forgot the last thing in that: "And my dad and 100+ million other people totally buy what the GOP says without ever EVER checking the facts or engaging in critical thinking."

Hate to end it on a "people are stupid" kick but derrrr

biologically wrong (Z S), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 03:22 (fifteen years ago)

whole lindsay graham thing is really weird

shipley and him (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 03:27 (fifteen years ago)

especially since I always thought he was a woman anyway.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 03:36 (fifteen years ago)

lindsay is obv a bottom?

shipley and him (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 03:37 (fifteen years ago)

...of the barrel.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 03:38 (fifteen years ago)

from salon:

The underlying agenda on the Republican side, from the top down, is to frustrate and humiliate the president and the Democratic majority -- and to ensure that no legislation passes. They typically begin with a memo from Frank Luntz, outlining rhetorical tricks that will be used to mislead and anger voters, while obscuring the true content of any proposal that Democrats might consider.

At the same time, Republicans on the relevant committees simulate bargaining over matters of substance with their Democratic counterparts, which is what the civics books tell us they are supposed to do, of course. But when a bill emerges and debate is scheduled to begin, McConnell stalls the process by threatening a filibuster, due to allegedly unacceptable features of the legislation or an alleged refusal by the Democrats to consult with Republicans. His false claims are aimed at a single objective: to justify the filibuster threat.

Now this strategy is easy to implement at almost no political cost, because the public is distracted, confused and distrusting of both political parties as well as the media. The outlines of reality are not as clear-cut as the crisp phrasing of Luntzian propaganda, which relies on tropes of three or four words to crystallize opposition framing.

And old principles that once governed the behavior of Congress, and especially senators, have been discarded.

biologically wrong (Z S), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 04:02 (fifteen years ago)

I mean we deserve all this, the USA deserves this bullshit political system. We really do.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 06:34 (fifteen years ago)

We're kind of due to have a complete collapse into fascist tyranny. Most countries have a hard time going 300 years without it, right?

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 06:41 (fifteen years ago)

Luckily instead of a brilliant sociopath like Benito Mussolini, we have someone who writes notes on their hands.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 06:42 (fifteen years ago)

The notes on the hand isn't really indicative of anything. It's the fact that she had notes, and still said nothing. Hell, I put a twist tie around my finger the other day to remind myself to drop the Netflix in the mailbox. It worked, too.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 08:27 (fifteen years ago)

I'm going to write a buncha editorials making fun of kenan's twist-tie

aerosmith live at the mohegan sun (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 08:31 (fifteen years ago)

The twist tie analogy doesn't work. Unless perhaps you were the postal worker and wore a twist tie to remind yourself COLLECT AND DELIVER MAIL.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:16 (fifteen years ago)

I don't follow. I was reminding myself of something; she was reminding herself of something. I was reminding myself to do a thing; so was she. The difference is that she was reminding herself to repeat completely empty talking points as if they were truths, and I was having trouble remembering to go to the mailbox.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:25 (fifteen years ago)

Ok I see your point.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:26 (fifteen years ago)

But! Obama has been notoriously reliant on the teleprompter. So... yeah.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:30 (fifteen years ago)

I mean we deserve all this, the USA deserves this bullshit political system. We really do.

We're kind of due to have a complete collapse into fascist tyranny. Most countries have a hard time going 300 years without it, right?]

i'm going to float the idea of teabag secession again. i know Scalia sez no dice (http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2010/02/17/justice-scalias-thoughts-on-state-secession-penned-to-one-man/tab/article/). but whatever. i think the time is now.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:30 (fifteen years ago)

If the CSA#2 will pay me for my house and land, and the smaller USA will pay my moving expenses to Madison, WI or wherever, I'm all for it.

millions now zinging will never lol (WmC), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:34 (fifteen years ago)

We're kind of due to have a complete collapse into fascist tyranny. Most countries have a hard time going 300 years without it, right?

Call me a hippie, but if you think anybody is "due" for fascism, you're taking a longer view of history than is useful.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:36 (fifteen years ago)

i'm with you. employ some unused stimulus money (there's still some, right?) maybe work out some real estate trades with yankee teabaggers, build a FUCKING HUEG WALL (shovel-ready project right there), and it's like, later petulant assholes. the adults can get on with the business of running a country.

xpost

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)

not if your country/planet may or may not be on the edge of a political/society/economic/environmental collapse

xpost to kenan

millions now zinging will never lol (WmC), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)

But! Obama has been notoriously reliant on the teleprompter. So... yeah.

― Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, April 21, 2010 10:30 AM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

this isnt true

max, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:39 (fifteen years ago)

xp What are you advocating here?

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)

Meanwhile, the man who runs the nation or something:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/25/magazine/25allen-t.html?hp

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)

this isnt true

Yeah, I know. It's as true as it is of anyone who has ever used a teleprompter.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)

I'm not advocating anything. When I see something as being due or overdue, I'm talking about it being expected, not that I'm trying to help bring it about.

millions now zinging will never lol (WmC), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:41 (fifteen years ago)

still still still don't understand the teleprompter thing. it's just so weird. obama is better and faster on his feet at extemporaneous speaking than any public figure i can remember, never mind any president. he's so good the republicans will never again allow him to get up onstage in a room full of them and do on-the-fly Q&A. but they keep up with the "teleprompter" thing. i just don't get it.

i mean, i do. but i don't.

women are a bunch of dudes (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:42 (fifteen years ago)

noam chomsky thinks that were living in a time period 'very similar' to weimar germany

max, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:42 (fifteen years ago)

When I see something as being due or overdue, I'm talking about it being expected, not that I'm trying to help bring it about.

I do understand that. But people aren't tectonic plates or alignments of planets. At least... I hope not. Actually I'm pretty sure not.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:43 (fifteen years ago)

History doesn't repeat itself except in books.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:45 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i still find it fascinating that the teleprompter jabs actually land.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)

with a certain, disturbingly large sector of the pop.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:46 (fifteen years ago)

will, we need to meet up sometime and start a riot at some conservative Memphisto watering hole

millions now zinging will never lol (WmC), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:47 (fifteen years ago)

Does Noam have a blog or something that he updates regularly? The last thing I read by him was from like 2006 and he was talking about the war on terror and it was so incredibly otm...

That being said, I don't think fear of a fascist tyranny is realistic or good for anyone other than Glen Beck or Alex Jones. And if you're trying to sell your 2012 book.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:49 (fifteen years ago)

heh do we go teabag bougie (a la Sunday after church at Houston's) or do we go dirtball (Harpo's in Frayser)

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:50 (fifteen years ago)

Which group is slower? I'm not really much of a fighter, though I've delivered more broken bones than I've received.

millions now zinging will never lol (WmC), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:54 (fifteen years ago)

i read some interview on some leftie website

im not a huge fan, though i think chomskys a smart enough guy--but comparing now to weimar germany is, uh, not otm, to say the least

max, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 14:54 (fifteen years ago)

surely there are some people on this thread who agree w/ him on that

iatee, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:03 (fifteen years ago)

the real protection we have against fascist tyranny is more structural than ideological. i was talking about this with some reporter friends the other day. unless you pay a lot of attention to how government really works for some reason (like, you get paid to do it, like i do), a lot of people i think don't appreciate how really decentralized power in the united states is. it's true that the federal government has grown a lot more powerful over time and taken on more responsibilities, but it was starting from a fairly weak position. the reality is that state and local governments still have a lot of control over budgets and services. including, for a start, law enforcement. towns, cities, counties and states all their own law enforcement operations, many of which spend a fair amount of time feuding with each other. the idea that you could ever have some kind of centralized control over law enforcement in this country -- a primary requirement for a "police state" -- is really far-fetched. then you get into, say, education, another area where real authoritarian states exercise absolute control. notwithstanding federal laws like the special-education act and no child left behind, control of american schools very much resides at the local level. (which can be both a good and bad thing, it depends on where you are.)

in that sense, all the bullshit noise and lawsuits from some states over the health-care law is a healthy sign. i think they're likely to lose on that particular issue -- i sort of doubt anything in the health care bill is unconstitutional -- but it's a reminder that state governments really do have a fair amount of power vis-a-vis the feds. i mean, what creeping authoritarianism really looks like is what happened in russia, when putin did away with all the elected regional governors and appointed his own in their place. that is unimaginable in the united states, and the fact that's unimaginable tells you how far we really are from federal tyranny.

that's not to say "don't worry be happy," but constitutionally and by the sheer force of inertia, the u.s. is just not set up well for centralized authoritarianism.

women are a bunch of dudes (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)

I take it Chomsky means that the people of the USA will elect authoritarians at all levels of government; that is, fascism coming from the soil of the American people rather than instituted from "on high".

Euler, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:07 (fifteen years ago)

Surely for Chomsky it's always been like Weimar Germany. Guy isn't exacty a nuanced thinker on that point.

ryan, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:08 (fifteen years ago)

I take it Chomsky means that the people of the USA will elect authoritarians at all levels of government; that is, fascism coming from the soil of the American people rather than instituted from "on high".

maybe. but that's just kinda stupid.

women are a bunch of dudes (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:11 (fifteen years ago)

oh come on, I've never seen chomsky blame the soil of the american people for anything - remember, they were brainwashed by the government+media. everything's 'on high' from his worldview.

iatee, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:12 (fifteen years ago)

I think it's far more likely any fascist America state will occur as a result of the government being stripped of its democratic power and unable to protect citizens against more powerful entities. Corporations have a long history of placing their own interests ahead of the public wellbeing, and are successfully winning this battle. I find the rate of recent mega-mergers far scarier than anything the government is doing, at least domestically.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:12 (fifteen years ago)

I agree that it's a stupid view, typically promulgated by people who've spent little time amongst the people they blame for the fate of the nation.

Euler, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)

I think this line of thinking is often backed up with the idea that the Nazis were democratically elected, which is only kinda sorta true. Yeah, there were some semi-legit elections, but it was basically voting at gunpoint. As far as I know, the kind of large-scale intimidation and factional fighting that happened in Germany during the 30s is completely unheard of in 21st century US.

Moodles, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)

a lot of people i think don't appreciate how really decentralized power in the united states is. it's true that the federal government has grown a lot more powerful over time and taken on more responsibilities, but it was starting from a fairly weak position. the reality is that state and local governments still have a lot of control over budgets and services. including, for a start, law enforcement. towns, cities, counties and states all their own law enforcement operations, many of which spend a fair amount of time feuding with each other.

absolutely correct! Look how long it took the Supreme Court to incorporate the Bill of Rights!

Also: fascist talk = yawn. Gore Vidal's been on this tip since the Harrison administration.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:14 (fifteen years ago)

i think big corporations are a potential "threat to democracy" in that they have lots of money and power and no real commitment to democratic government per se., butthe other thing to keep in mind there is that a lot of people running corporations are idiots. i mean, they're smart enough to look out for their own turf -- e.g. exxonmobil keeping carbon regulations at bay -- but they're not going to (and don't want to) "take over the world." and they're as prone to overreach and self-destruct as they are to establish any kind of lasting monopoly on power.

women are a bunch of dudes (tipsy mothra), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:17 (fifteen years ago)

Chomsky seems to believe that the confluence of corporate-military fusion, expansive militarism, and "blood and soil" nationalism that characterized Nazi Germany picks out some archetype of history; that these elements are just latent in statehood. In believing that he's buying a myth that the Nazis were trying to promulgate.

Euler, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:20 (fifteen years ago)

Big LOLZ from the Supreme Court. "Tell us more about these 'com-pyoo-tors' of which you speak!"

During oral arguments today in the case City of Ontario v. Quon, which considers whether police officers had an expectation of privacy in personal (and sexually explicit) text messages sent on pagers issued to them by the city, the justices of the Supreme Court at times seemed to struggle with the technology involved.

The first sign was about midway through the argument, when Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. - who is known to write out his opinions in long hand with pen and paper instead of a computer - asked what the difference was “between email and a pager?”

Other justices’ questions showed that they probably don’t spend a lot of time texting and tweeting away from their iPhones either.

At one point, Justice Anthony Kennedy asked what would happen if a text message was sent to an officer at the same time he was sending one to someone else.

“Does it say: ‘Your call is important to us, and we will get back to you?’” Kennedy asked.

Justice Antonin Scalia wrangled a bit with the idea of a service provider.

“You mean (the text) doesn’t go right to me?” he asked.

Then he asked whether they can be printed out in hard copy.

“Could Quon print these spicy little conversations and send them to his buddies?” Scalia asked.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:21 (fifteen years ago)

Corporations know as long as they "overreach and self-destruct" without restraint, we will be there to bail them out. As for "taking over the world" it will be interesting to see if Germany or Scotland pursue any legal action against Goldman Sachs. Apparently they swindled Scotland out of $451 billion.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:21 (fifteen years ago)

tipsy, that sounds right, but while giving idiots lots of power may ultimately lead to self-destruction, in the meantime they can do a lot of damage, especially to intellectuals and outsiders (hence Chomsky's concern I think).

Euler, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)

butthe other thing to keep in mind there is that a lot of people running corporations are idiots. i mean, they're smart enough to look out for their own turf -- e.g. exxonmobil keeping carbon regulations at bay -- but they're not going to (and don't want to) "take over the world."

Among other perfidies, oil companies -- notably, Shell -- pay for private armies to kill muckraking residents in countries in which they do busines. Given that, I'm not sure what you believe they believe their limits might be.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

holy hell, supreme Court

HI DERE, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

"We'd like to ask the Supreme Court to recuse themselves because clearly they know nothing about this topic."

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

This has been covered already, I think, but tipsy's post that begins with the real protection we have against fascist tyranny is both right and wrong. The whole time I was reading it, I was thinking, "But what about the money?"

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)

both FDR and Hannah Arendt concluded separately that fascism usually creeps in when there's a power vacuum up top. Now the dispersal of power of which our system is composed doesn't necessarily lead to fascism.

Look, I'm all for the GOP electing Tea Baggers. As soon as they get a taste of what being a congressman or senator's like they'll lose their principles and become hacks like the rest (e.g. Scott Brown).

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

GOP electing Tea Baggers" and "GOP electing GOP members" is splitting hairs for the most part

iatee, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

"

iatee, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

I think this line of thinking is often backed up with the idea that the Nazis were democratically elected, which is only kinda sorta true. Yeah, there were some semi-legit elections, but it was basically voting at gunpoint.

The NDSP won the Reichstag lelections in January and after the Reichtag fire in February, Hindenburg gave sweeping emergency powers to Hitler but the Nazis DID win those elections and its worthwhile to consider that the Weimar Republic was a federal republic (just as the Empire had been a federal Empire) and that Hindenburg's granting of emergency powers totally side-stepped the constitution and suspended the governments of the federal states.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

Mitch McConnell and John Boehner may pretend to be "fellow travelers" but they're not, nor will they ever be Tea Baggers. Tool bags, yes.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

Oops, I meant 'lolections'.

xpost

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

As soon as they get a taste of what being a congressman or senator's like they'll lose their principles and become hacks like the rest (e.g. Scott Brown).

Reminds me of that Bill Hicks bit about how when you become President, they sit you down in a cigar-smoke-filled room with the corporate scumbags who got you there and show you a film of the Kennedy assassination from and angle you've never seen before, and then ask, "Any questions?"

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

that supremes bit is amazing.

kinda makes you think that a person's basic assumptions about the world, theology, gender, history etc might be more important than "time on the bench"

goole, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

I think the Tea party storm is basic old-fashioned xenophobic populism and, as such, will mostly die out with the next upturn in the economy; it's basically a tentrum thrown by people of disparate and rather dumb ideological positions rallying 'round traditional American patriotic iconography. They show no signs of wishing to govern and eventually the electorate punishes parties and movements like that though the immigration law in Arizona makes me seriously wonder about their anti-government, anti-totalitarian credentials.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

“Could Quon print these spicy little conversations and send them to his buddies?” Scalia asked.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

M. White otm can we stop worrying about these bozos now k thx bye

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, really. Talking about "building walls" and uh-oh-here-comes-fascism genuinely delights these guys. Catching a bit of Limbaugh's show a couple of weeks ago he gleefully quoted some liberal drip (Bob Herbert?) in the NYT worrying about the rise of fascism.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

Hindenburg's granting of emergency powers totally side-stepped the constitution and suspended the governments of the federal states.

Sounds like... Lincoln.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

this is what chomsky actually said, in case anyone is wondering:

“It is very similar to late Weimar Germany,” Chomsky told me when I called him at his office in Cambridge, Mass. “The parallels are striking. There was also tremendous disillusionment with the parliamentary system. The most striking fact about Weimar was not that the Nazis managed to destroy the Social Democrats and the Communists but that the traditional parties, the Conservative and Liberal parties, were hated and disappeared. It left a vacuum which the Nazis very cleverly and intelligently managed to take over.”

“The United States is extremely lucky that no honest, charismatic figure has arisen,” Chomsky went on. “Every charismatic figure is such an obvious crook that he destroys himself, like McCarthy or Nixon or the evangelist preachers. If somebody comes along who is charismatic and honest this country is in real trouble because of the frustration, disillusionment, the justified anger and the absence of any coherent response. What are people supposed to think if someone says ‘I have got an answer, we have an enemy’? There it was the Jews. Here it will be the illegal immigrants and the blacks. We will be told that white males are a persecuted minority. We will be told we have to defend ourselves and the honor of the nation. Military force will be exalted. People will be beaten up. This could become an overwhelming force. And if it happens it will be more dangerous than Germany. The United States is the world power. Germany was powerful but had more powerful antagonists. I don’t think all this is very far away. If the polls are accurate it is not the Republicans but the right-wing Republicans, the crazed Republicans, who will sweep the next election.”

max, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

Sounds like... Lincoln.

No it doesn't.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, that was a stretch. Withdrawn.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

Chomsky's act is such a wheeze now. I mean LOL at Nixon ever being considered "charismatic." Not even his supporters damned him with this praise.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)

Can't liberals and conservatives agree to stop drawing analogies between Nazi Germany and some contemporary nonsense? Conservatives love "appeasement"/Neville Chamberlain; liberals love "Weimar Germany." Can't they use the Crimean War or something?

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:49 (fifteen years ago)

Sounds like... Lincoln.

As was pointed out at the time (that he was a 'tyrant', etc...) The Reichstag also passed an enabling law that consolidated power in Hitler's hands, something that would require a Constitutional convention or a vote from Congress and the states.

Alfred, otm wrt to myopic and hyperventilating partisan references to 20th history.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

do you really want people hyperventilating over the Ottoman Empire

HI DERE, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)

"What Obama is doing is nothing less than a return to the cronyism of the royal court in Istanbul."

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

I think I hear nazi germany analogies used more often *outside* of political discussions.

iatee, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:54 (fifteen years ago)

xp C'mon, that would be fun.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:54 (fifteen years ago)

can't believe the teabaggers are gonna burn down the reichstag again

livestock crush (velko), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

Big LOLZ from the Supreme Court. "Tell us more about these 'com-pyoo-tors' of which you speak!"

During oral arguments today in the case City of Ontario v. Quon, which considers whether police officers had an expectation of privacy in personal (and sexually explicit) text messages sent on pagers issued to them by the city, the justices of the Supreme Court at times seemed to struggle with the technology involved.
The first sign was about midway through the argument, when Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. - who is known to write out his opinions in long hand with pen and paper instead of a computer - asked what the difference was “between email and a pager?”

Other justices’ questions showed that they probably don’t spend a lot of time texting and tweeting away from their iPhones either.

At one point, Justice Anthony Kennedy asked what would happen if a text message was sent to an officer at the same time he was sending one to someone else.

“Does it say: ‘Your call is important to us, and we will get back to you?’” Kennedy asked.

Justice Antonin Scalia wrangled a bit with the idea of a service provider.

“You mean (the text) doesn’t go right to me?” he asked.

Then he asked whether they can be printed out in hard copy.

“Could Quon print these spicy little conversations and send them to his buddies?” Scalia asked.

Jesus fucking Christ

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 15:58 (fifteen years ago)

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/04/geico_voice_actor_fired_after.html

GEICO voice actor fired after insulting tea parties

Sometimes you have a headline that makes the rest of the story superfluous, but here's the background. Actor Lance Baxter, otherwise known as "D.C. Douglas," currently known as the man who informs you how much GEICO can save you on car insurance, left a message last month with FreedomWorks in which he asked the group how many "mentally retarded" people it had on staff and what it would do when a tea partyer "killed someone." On April 14, FreedomWorks put his voicemail online.

well done dipshit!

goole, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

Dan, I kind of wish all the Tea Partiers and Xtian Right would hyper-ventilate a little more over the 17th Cent. wars of religion, for example.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

hasn't clarence thomas showed them how to download porn yet?

livestock crush (velko), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

Makes me real excited for the time when the Supreme Court tackles an issue like Net Neutrality.

Moodles, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

hasn't clarence thomas showed them how to download porn yet?

According to Jeffrey Toobin's book, Thomas has a picture of a lesbian clerk and her partner on his desk.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:08 (fifteen years ago)

Makes me real excited for the time when the Supreme Court tackles an issue like Net Neutrality.

I'm not sure how you spell "nnggngguhnnngghuhuhuh"

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

I'm surprised no one's talking about SCOTUS rejecting the ban on animal cruelty videos (8-1).

Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. dissented, saying the majority’s analysis was built on “fanciful hypotheticals” and would serve to protect “depraved entertainment.” He said it was implausible to suggest that Congress meant to ban depictions of hunting or that the practice amounted to animal cruelty.

Chief Justice Roberts replied that Justice Alito “contends that hunting depictions must have serious value because hunting has serious value, in a way that dogfights presumably do not. “But, he went on, the 1999 law “addresses the value of the depictions, not of the underlying activity.”

The exchange was unusual, as Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito are almost always on the same side. In the last term, the two justices, both appointed by President George W. Bush, agreed 92 percent of the time, more than any other pair of justices.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

According to Jeffrey Toobin's book, Thomas has a picture of a lesbian clerk and her partner on his desk.

what are they doing in this picture...

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

Am sort of amazed at folks taking the Supreme Court article at face value -- the Justices' questions are not about their misunderstandings of technology but about trying to differentiate among technologies in order to avoid settled precedent.

Three Word Username, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

so you guys actually believe that scotus is a bunch of retards? ffs asking rhetorical questions about the difference between texting and email is their fucking JOB

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

They're giving him a vigorous dissent.

xxpost.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

Am sort of amazed at folks taking the Supreme Court article at face value -- the Justices' questions are not about their misunderstandings of technology but about trying to differentiate among technologies in order to avoid settled precedent.

^^^ agree

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

to support a ban on animal cruelty videos while allowing the conditions that persist in slaughterhouses to go on unchecked by any save the least restrictive of overseers would kinda be base hypocrisy imo

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

xp ditto

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

This is a case where I agree with the decision but cringe at its logic. Like this passage in Roberts' opinion:

Child pornography, he said, is “a special case” because the market for it is “intrinsically related to the underlying abuse.”

And animal cruelty videos aren't intrinsically related to the underlying abuse?

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:19 (fifteen years ago)

Perrin is right: Tea Party cred comes when they go SLA/Weather

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:19 (fifteen years ago)

And animal cruelty videos aren't intrinsically related to the underlying abuse?

And abusing animals is as bad as sexually abusing children? I mean, really.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:21 (fifteen years ago)

he didn't say that kenan

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

to be clear, we're talking here about killing animals for sexual pleasure. so let's at least, when we're falsely accusing another poster of stating an equivalency, get our false accusations right.

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

Actor Lance Baxter, otherwise known as "D.C. Douglas," currently known as the man who informs you how much GEICO can save you on car insurance,

Is that the bionic-baritone dude who says "Is Ed 'Too Tall' Jones too tall?"

Nom Nom Nom Chomsky (WmC), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

xp I do not believe that the false equivalency is the one I made, especially.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

And abusing animals is as bad as sexually abusing children? I mean, really.

You need to reread what I said.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

Ah. The cringing at the logic clause. Gotcha.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

to be clear, we're talking here about killing animals for sexual pleasure.

Eh, the case at hand before the court involved dogfight videos IIRC, not those "crush" videos.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

It sounds like legalese, really. More like standard newspeak than anything worthy of contempt or even analysis.

Child pornography, he said, is “a special case” because the market for it is “intrinsically related to the underlying abuse.”

"Making child pornography is intrinsically child abuse" would just be too short a sentence.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah. I can't believe the Supreme Court speaks in legalese.

Mr. Que, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

Filming a human being who is being abused constitutes abuse. It is a further outrage upon the person, about whose right to not be exploited the law is clear. The same protections do not apply to animals, about whose different, considerably lesser rights the law is also unambiguous. While we who count ourselves extremists on this question wish the law were otherwise, it isn't. Not sure if that's something Roberts is explicitly saying but I'd guess that this question speaks to the "how is this different" question.

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

Pretty sure Michael Vick went to jail for the thing depicted in the videos in the case at hand.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, yeah, it's unambiguous that animals have less protection under the law than people do, but you can't make a damned dogfight video without fighting dogs, which is illegal.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

xpost right, because he did the abusing. still illegal to abuse animals. not illegal to distribute videos of them or to document it. because an animal does not enjoy under the law the right to not have its suffering documented, because said documentation doesn't constitute further abuse. isn't that correct?

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

lol CNN currently running two polls with completely contradictory results

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:51 (fifteen years ago)

compare, contrast, laugh:

A majority of Americans expect President Obama to appoint a liberal to the Supreme Court, but only one in four want that to happen, according to a new national poll.

vs.

A majority of Americans say they have confidence in President Obama to make the right decision when it comes to filling the upcoming vacancy on the Supreme Court, according to a new national poll.

classic

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

there are lies, there are damn lies, and then there are statistics

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

why do lawyers have to make laughing at excerpts from the Supreme Court less fun

HI DERE, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

I'll stop laughing at Roberts in re: text messages when I'm in the cold, hard ground

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

maybe they secretly think that his appointing a liberal is the "right decision"

ksh, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

an animal does not enjoy under the law the right to not have its suffering documented, because said documentation doesn't constitute further abuse. isn't that correct?

It is, and why not? Animals do not have the sense of self that humans do, do not (apart from maybe chimps) process 2D images except as light and shadow, do not feel shame and embarrassment, and do not give one piddle on the rug whether they are on videotape or not. If this is about the rights of the victim, then videotaping the dogfight vs. not videotaping it is not an issue.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

Do dogs get embarrassed?
In: Dog Behavior [Edit categories]

Answer

Yes, in fact some dogs can get very embarrassed such as you scolding them in front of company you may have over. They will generally put their tail between their legs and wander off and some may hide under couches or lay on their bed looking very forlorn.

just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

aw

HI DERE, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:59 (fifteen years ago)

http://suzannemcminn.com/wp-content/uploads/ashamedcoco.jpg

HI DERE, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 16:59 (fifteen years ago)

Baloney. Ask a dog to list his most embarrassing moments.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/04/wednesday-round-up-30/

bunch of stuff linked here re: both US vs. stevens and the quon spicy texts message thing

goole, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:01 (fifteen years ago)

dogs don't list their most embarrassing moments because their 'owners' have already put them up on youtube, a gross violation that imo needs to be stopped.

just darraghmac tbh (darraghmac), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

show me a dog who is all "there's the times when I wolf down what looks like a delicious candy bar but is actually my own poop" and I will say "HOLY SHIT, A TALKING DOG"

HI DERE, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

lol CNN currently running two polls with completely contradictory results

Liberal judges who make left wing decisions are partisan activists, conservative judges who make right wing decisions are objective interpreters of the letter of law.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

^^been arguing that w/ fam for years.

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

haha I was scrolled down and didn't see Adam's post at first, so I was all "you've been arguing with your fam about talking dogs? for YEARS?"

HI DERE, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)

Liberal judges who make left wing decisions are partisan activists, conservative judges who make right wing decisions are objective interpreters of the letter of law.

uh that's not what the poll is about, the poll is about what type of justice the public expects/wants Obama to appoint and the way the polls were framed produced directly conflicting results - one indicates that America is confident Obama will appoint someone they approve of, the other poll indicates that the America thinks Obama will appoint a liberal and they don't want that. such a joke.

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

Well, yeah, because it's common knowledge that "liberal" = activist judge.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:16 (fifteen years ago)

lol i HAVE totally argued w/ my mom re: complex emotions. she remains convinced they are small furry people.

xxpost

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:17 (fifteen years ago)

totally don't care about the animal cruelty law video ruling, sorry. seems like a stupid law to begin with.

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:19 (fifteen years ago)

The seeming incompatibility of those CNN polls just shows how effective the anti-progressive smear machine is. It's the same kind of results they got from listing actual components of the HCR bill vs. "Obamacare". People are stanning against their own interests because of the negative connotation.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

It is, and why not? Animals do not have the sense of self that humans do, do not (apart from maybe chimps) process 2D images except as light and shadow, do not feel shame and embarrassment, and do not give one piddle on the rug whether they are on videotape or not. If this is about the rights of the victim, then videotaping the dogfight vs. not videotaping it is not an issue.

kenan I'm just clarifying what the court ruled, not trying to have some asinine argument over the content of it

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:22 (fifteen years ago)

I would also like to avoid asinine arguments. *handshake*

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:29 (fifteen years ago)

do not (apart from maybe chimps) process 2D images except as light and shadow,

Clearly you have never seen my cat Rusty watch "Winged Migration" on television.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:29 (fifteen years ago)

That doesn't mean it's not light and shadow, though. My cat will chase shadows of squirrels on the wall as easily as she will stare out the window longingly at the real thing.

Jack Human (kenan), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:33 (fifteen years ago)

kenan, quit trolling for an argument about the sentience of animals or start a thread marked "I want an argument that never fucking ends," k, thx

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:38 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.scotusblog.com/2010/04/first-amendment-left-intact/

ok small point of order here:

On the broader question of what categories of expression should be put outside the First Amendment’s protection, Justice Alito argued that “crush videos” should not be shielded “because they are so closely linked with violent criminal conduct,” which itself gets no constitutional protection. He wrote: “The videos record the commission of violent criminal acts, and it appears that these crimes are committed for the sole purpose of creating the videos.” And, he added, Congress had before it “compelling evidence” that the only way to prevent the crime of animal cruelty was to target the sale of the videos — a perception that, Alito suggested, seemed to have been proven when the passage of the 1999 law led within a few years to destruction of the “crush video industry,” only to have it revive after the Third Circuit struck down that law.

i thought "crush videos" were entirely legendary??

― goole, Wednesday, April 21, 2010 1:16 PM (23 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Goole posted this over in the Ke$ha thread. Maybe you guys want this post?

kingkongvsgodzilla, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

I'm unclear how videos of dogfighting - which is illegal - aren't unprotected under the same reasoning

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

oh shit did i put that in the wrong thread?? ha

goole, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

better putting a post on the wrong thread than putting a comment on the wrong Facebook status, like I did to rrrobyn the other day

HI DERE, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:53 (fifteen years ago)

Hey, if this could turn into something like Shakey's Star Wars/individual meter data thread, I'm all for it!

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:54 (fifteen years ago)

Well, yeah, because it's common knowledge that "liberal" = German shepherds.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

which supreme is most ke$ha?

goole, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

which supreme is most ke$ha?

http://i.usatoday.net/news/_photos/2007/05/10/kennedyx.jpg

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

I'm unclear how videos of dogfighting - which is illegal - aren't unprotected under the same reasoning

― brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, April 21, 2010 12:42 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark

i think because this law in particular was worded such that any depiction of the death or injury of an animal could land the possessor or maker of the depiction in jail.

goole, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

That was how I read it ^^^

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

Hey, if this could turn into something like Shakey's Star Wars/individual meter data thread, I'm all for it!

LOL

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)

omg lol

http://www.hermenaut.com/a99.shtml

goole, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 18:15 (fifteen years ago)

If he'd actually read the text descriptions of those crushie videos, he'd know exactly what the attraction of them is: They're for masochists who want to imagine themselves as the item being crushed. I don't know what the attraction of animal crush videos are, but I wouldn't be suprised if it wasn't a simular reason.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

i really didn't think they existed, tbh!

i think it's also clear that the law in question was an attention-grabbing moralist stunt, but, that's the legislative process for you.

goole, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

It would've been awesome if the decision was worded just like that.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

I saw one once of a woman crushing a cassette tape.

kissogram powers (Abbott), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 18:47 (fifteen years ago)

Cassette tapes in indie imagery = YOUR HEART

Ask foreigners and they will tell you the gospel comes from America. (Laurel), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 18:48 (fifteen years ago)

So there are videos featuring scantily clad women, and this guy is wondering what the attraction is?

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 21 April 2010 19:00 (fifteen years ago)

I'm unclear how videos of dogfighting - which is illegal - aren't unprotected under the same reasoning

― brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, April 21, 2010 12:42 PM (14 minutes ago) Bookmark

i think because this law in particular was worded such that any depiction of the death or injury of an animal could land the possessor or maker of the depiction in jail.

― goole, Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:02 PM (59 minutes ago)

yeah otm it was a really dumb law and a good decision by the court

my two percent's worth (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)

Dems out-raising Republicans for midterms

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

I saw a snippet of FOX a little while ago: "does the Alito-Roberts split in the court signal a new era?"

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

It's like, uh....they vote together 92% of the time.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

well sure but if you used Fox News Math you would know that not only do they vote together 92% of the time, they also split their vote 38% of the time. Also 15% of the time they are undecided.

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

but 100% of the time they are on the supreme court and 1000% of the time they put their pants on before their shoes

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

and 101% of the time they give 110% effort, 8 days a week

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 21 April 2010 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

the return of the anonymous liberal
http://www.anonymousliberal.com/2010/04/army-of-trumans.html
heartfelt lament about conservative epistemic closure

kamerad, Thursday, 22 April 2010 02:02 (fifteen years ago)

throwing darts in Palin's eyes

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 April 2010 02:06 (fifteen years ago)

"How do you begin to make your case when there aren't any mutually accepted facts?"

otm : /

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Thursday, 22 April 2010 02:36 (fifteen years ago)

More on the SCOTUS. Greenwald interprets the Court's 8-1 decision on the animal rights video case as a sharp rebuke to Kagan, solicitor general.

The issue isn't that she lost; even the greatest lawyers lose in court sometimes. The issue is that, in defending the constitutionality of this statute, Kagan chose to advocate a position on the First Amendment so restrictive and extremist that it clearly seemed to offend both the conservative and liberal factions on the Court. It drove 8 Justices together to strike down the statute because -- as a result of the arguments made by Kagan -- they perceived the sweeping law as a genuine threat to the First Amendment. In essence, the Government's brief signed by Kagan literally argued -- notwithstanding the First Amendment's clear prohibition on laws "abridging the freedom of speech" -- that the Government is free to criminalize ideas whose "societal costs" clearly outweigh their value

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 April 2010 14:23 (fifteen years ago)

[@ WmC - Houston's will probably lead to arrest; Harpo's (if it's still open?) might lead to be "disposed of"

if y'all make it up for a Redbirds game or some such, give me a shout and we can grab a cold one]

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Thursday, 22 April 2010 14:43 (fifteen years ago)

hey so Lord Alfred & others in the know about FLA politics: Any chance Crist as an independent splits the vote and Florida gets a new Democratic senator?

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

it doesn't seem like Crist has much Republican support at all (down by double digits?! ouch) My guess would be he's more likely to split the Dem vote, no...?

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

Crist is toast.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

He would have been better off appointing himself senator when Mel Martinez resigned.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I don't really see who his base of support is at the moment

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:51 (fifteen years ago)

Old tan guys.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

lols. a base of lols.

goole, Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

it doesn't seem like Crist has much Republican support at all (down by double digits?! ouch) My guess would be he's more likely to split the Dem vote, no...?

lol wut

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 22 April 2010 16:59 (fifteen years ago)

well is *anyone* gonna vote for this Meek guy? don't hear anything about him.

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 April 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)

Meek's counting on exhaustion from the primary race. He's a blah machine politician.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 April 2010 17:10 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/04/rubios-path-easiest-crists-challenging.html

if Crist stays in, this'll be a fun one to watch, anyway. presumably we don't hear anything about Meek because lol FL dems.

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 22 April 2010 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

Bill Nelson, our senior senator, is a grinning non-entity.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 April 2010 17:13 (fifteen years ago)

“I can make a firm pledge. Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.”

Not unless those taxes would be a VAT.

Jesus saved fewer people than my Savior Obama will (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

i know! he's such a liar

goole, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:19 (fifteen years ago)

He's never lied.

He just changes his mind as the facts change.

We need a VAT. Badly.

The only thing Obama needs to do secure his legacy is to humi (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

here is something i did not know:

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/04/casino_jack_alex_gibneys_abramoff_documentary.php

The best part of Casino Jack is the archival footage that puts the disgraced super-lobbyist in the context of the conservative movement stretching back to his years at the helm of the College Republicans in the early 1980s.

(Abramoff's infatuation with [Jonas] Savimbi, by the way, was the inspiration for the 1989 Dolph Lundgren vehicle Red Scorpion, produced and written by Abramoff.)

goole, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

there is no VAT yet FYI

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

xp ha well i'd agree with the second two statements there don

xps

goole, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

I'm not 100% certain Don is criticizing Obama here.

HI DERE, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

I have no idea what don is talking about

my two percent's worth (k3vin k.), Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

VAT

max, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

well, instituting a VAT would violate that particular statement, if that's important. i like the VAT idea, generally.

goole, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

not trying to be a dick, but i'm never really sure what Don is doing. i'm fully willing to accept that this might be my shortcoming...

xpost

Wishes he picked a cooler name. Fat. (will), Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:28 (fifteen years ago)

The only thing Obama needs to do secure his legacy is to humi

OTM

HI DERE, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:29 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i wouldnt mind a vat

max, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:29 (fifteen years ago)

...OF POTATO CHIPS

max, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:29 (fifteen years ago)

Cape Cod potato chips.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

...OF MID-GRADE WHITE WINE

goole, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

we used to disinfect our taxes in a humi-VAT - always made the payments cleaner

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

^^^ dangerously close to money laundering

HI DERE, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

money cleansing still 100% above-board afaik

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

i forget does all our money have shit on it or cocaine

goole, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

i guess that's not an either or really

goole, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha

HI DERE, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

oh and by the way did everyone see that JACK ABRAMOFF WROTE AND PRODUCED RED SCORPION!?!?!?! this is epochal.

goole, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

A big VAT lie

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-weigant/a-big-vat-lie_b_543703.html

curmudgeon, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

haha I had no idea that anyone was actually clamoring against instituting a VAT until just now, I just thought ppl were being goofy

HI DERE, Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

Asked if he could see the potential for a VAT, the President said: “I know that there’s been a lot of talk around town lately about the value-added tax. That is something that has worked for some countries. It’s something that would be novel for the United States. And before, you know, I start saying ‘this makes sense or that makes sense,’ I want to get a better picture of what our options are.

The "options" for a US VAT tax have been debated for decades. The picture is clear.

But hey, it's an option. Apparently.

Obama is awesome, awesome, awesome (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:54 (fifteen years ago)

omg the president expressed an interest in learning/talking about something how dare he

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:56 (fifteen years ago)

OMG if he doesn't know that the VAT has and always been a non-starter in the US, then...oh wait, I voted for this guy.

also, from that article at HuffPo:

But while President Obama has shown a certain amount of weasel room on his pledge not to raise taxes on anyone "making less than $200,000 a year" (such as the tobacco tax, or the "Cadillac" health plan tax), and while the official stance now seems to be that Obama won't raise "income taxes" on the under-$200,000 group;

hahahaha weasel room and Obama in the same sentence.

What's the difference between mendacity and weasel room?

What the hell IS a weasel room?

Obama is awesome, awesome, awesome (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 22 April 2010 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

don i'm having trouble understanding your pov here

is a VAT a good idea or not?

goole, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:02 (fifteen years ago)

Don thinks it's a bad idea and thinks that Obama wants to do some research before saying whetherit's a good idea or a bad idea is evidence that Obama is going to enact a VAT.

HI DERE, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

IOW, the President making a decision you agree with = the President is brilliant, but the President saying he needs to be better informed before making a decision = the President is a moron who wants to take away all of my money in taxes

HI DERE, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

which... really Don? I know you have a brain, maybe you should be using it here...?

HI DERE, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

why start now

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

huffpo guy doesn't understand how VAT works.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

president giving a totally vague and non-committal answer to a question posed by someone else /= president has plans to enact a VAT

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:11 (fifteen years ago)

We just watched the "Animals" ep of "Brass Eye" on Tuesday. I think they had a segment in a weasel room.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZgKCas5xJ34

Yup, here it is, at 4:04 in

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:13 (fifteen years ago)

And before, you know, I start saying ‘this makes sense or that makes sense,’ I want to get a better picture of what our options are.”

This is also known as Sending a Signal.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

Signal being "eh, not really my main goal, but MAYBE if the opposition are dicks about any of my budget priorities then I will threaten this" - at least, that's my interpretation

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

Or "it sounds interesting but I need to learn more about how it works before I start pontificating on it"

HI DERE, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

the VAT is a shitty idea for the US. It has almost zero support among pols or even a large slate of economists here...there are literally volumes of research that have been done on implementing it here. It is not politically feasible, as the dude in HuffPo notes. There is no reason for the president to even weasel around on it and there's no reason to engage more of his administration's tax dollars in studying the idea...it's a bunk, frivilous idea that won't work here in the U.S. I'd love to know why a vague, non-committal answer is appropriate when...nobody of any credibility thinks it's even a discussion worth having. It's like wishing for a flat tax or a national sales tax, but those are two ideas that are just as easily dismissed. But I'm pretty sure that Obama would never be so non-committal about them. Or maybe I'm totally wrong, in which case, there's no point in engaging my non-brain at all.

And to the larger point about weaseling around about raising taxes, well, that's just Obama showing his true colors I suppose. Anyone who didn't think he wouldn't, or that he wouldn't start parsing his campaign rhetoric, is kind of naive.

And Dan, what's wrong with calling out bullshit when it's bullshit, and brilliance when it's brilliance?

Obama is awesome, awesome, awesome (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

I'd love to know why a vague, non-committal answer is appropriate

THE IRONY

Nom Nom Nom Chomsky (WmC), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

and there's no reason to engage more of his administration's tax dollars in studying the idea

where is it suggested that any tax dollars are going to be spent "studying this idea". If you're so butthurt about the topic being raised as plausible at all, maybe you should take it up with the DUDE WHO ASKED THE QUESTION.

pretty sure the flat tax option was seriously discussed by numerous Republican candidates - esp. Ron Paul - btw

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

And Dan, what's wrong with calling out bullshit when it's bullshit, and brilliance when it's brilliance?

There's nothing wrong with it. The problem, as you inadvertently point out, is that you are automatically assuming every position you hold is brilliant and obvious to anyone with half a brain. NEWSFLASH: That's not true; it's not true of anyone.

My point is that these volumes of research are likely at Obama's fingertips and it won't take very much effort to come to the conclusion you're ranting about, assuming of course that a) your conclusion is correct re: political feasability and b) it wouldn't be helpful with anything. I'm sorry you're not used to dealing with someone whose default response isn't a flat YES or NO but instead "I'd rather read up on that before I really say anything about it". I'm neither a political scholar or a tax fiend, so I don't really know how VAT works and I don't know anything about the "literally volumes of research" you're citing. Maybe Obama is completely boned up on this stuff and is stonewalling. Maybe he hasn't gone through any VAT stuff because, as you point out, conventional wisdom states that it's impossible to do in the US. I don't know. I'm not going to fucking eviscerate someone for saying "that sounds interesting but I'd like to make an informed decision about it", particularly to a media that is increasingly less about presenting facts and more about decoding messages and mindreading.

HI DERE, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:29 (fifteen years ago)

I am sick of taxes being spent on studying things! JUST DO IT!

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:30 (fifteen years ago)

Dan, you've bantered with me long enough to know that I don't think my ideas are any more brilliant than Obama's...I know you're not that dim to my sarcasm. If I agree with him, I say so. And when he makes a retarded statement, I am happy to point that out.

The idea of the VAT has been a political football recently, and I don't find it believable to think a man of Obama's intellect is dim about it. Taxation and funding of the government has been a huge, important issue for any recent administration and there's simply no rational reason to assume that the concept hadn't been discussed with Obama.

I'm not eviscerating him either--just pointing out that the guy is capable of retarded comments.

Good god, I didn't study the VAT all that much, even in grad school, but it's a basic tax idea that has been dismissed over and over in the US for a long time for political reasons.

Obama is awesome, awesome, awesome (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

nobody of any credibility thinks it's even a discussion worth having

this is not true, unless you define credibility as... oh

max, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

this is like that time when they asked obama about 9-11 truthers, and he said, like, it was interesting, and he felt like he needed to review the idea before ordering the redrafting of all high school text books.

fat mantis (Hunt3r), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

hey max, it's not politically feasible here. it's the same shiny unicorn as the flat tax, the national sales tax, ending agricultural subsidies, ending the corporate welfare state, etc.

Obama is awesome, awesome, awesome (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

ok

max, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

but it's a basic tax idea that has been dismissed over and over in the US for a long time for political reasons.

this kind of waffling statement from Obama might be an effort to feel out what the current politics really are about the VAT. contra Dan, i'm fairly sure Obama is up on all the policy wonkery of the VAT, and my further suspicion is that WH bods really enjoy watching the paranoid right wing freak-out about it.

major overhaul of health care was "dismissed over and over in the US for a long time for political reasons" too, until it wasn't. same with putting the reins (back) on wall street. and here we are.

so, the VAT is within the realm of the possible then. let's say. is it a good idea for the american economy and fiscal position? with such a consumer-driven economy, maybe it is. paired with further reductions in middle and working class taxes as a trade-off? why not? (not that i'm an expert)

this administration has the curious pattern of doing nothing and swinging for the fences...

xps lol

goole, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

Pushing the VAT onto the US is a way bigger concept than giving away healthcare. I'm simplifying this, but people can sort of morally latch on to the idea of giving everyone healthcare, or at least subsidizing it so that people don't have to be sick and not cared for.

The VAT is way, way, way different. You can't reform our tax code by adding a VAT...I just don't see how you could make at VAT less regressive than it is without major-league EITC infusions and code kung fu, and even then the implementation would be met with massive opposition. It's one thing to take on 1/6th of the economy and another thing altogether to take on the entire economy.

As a whole, nothing polls more negatively than raising taxes here. You can't do a VAT on "the rich" or anyone making more than $250K. If you wanna do something about our consumption economy, why not a national sales tax instead? It's WAY easier for citizens to understand. But maybe that's the point.

Obama is awesome, awesome, awesome (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

I just wish that Obama would be honest about this issue--that he thinks we need to raise taxes somehow, some way. That's a way better way of starting the conversation than being vague about a discredited, confusing show pony like the VAT.

Obama is awesome, awesome, awesome (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

ha well i guess the distinction between VAT and "natl sales tax" is lost on me.

goole, Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)

I also wish he would have started the healthcare reform by saying, "Listen people: it's going to cost A LOT more money to give you everything you want in healthcare reform. And no one really knows if we will be able to bend the cost curve. We just know that too many people are suffering from a lack of healthcare. So let's fucking find the money for this bitch."

Obama is awesome, awesome, awesome (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:56 (fifteen years ago)

his kind of waffling statement from Obama might be an effort to feel out what the current politics really are about the VAT

that's what I meant by Obama "sending signals."

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 April 2010 19:57 (fifteen years ago)

x-post to Don-Various ways to find the money were proposed and fought over politically(taxing the rich versus taxing cadillac plans)plus talking about how it would help those who already have health insurance turned out politically to be as important as talking about those who don't.

On a different topic--

Robert Reich on public radio yesterday re wall street reform reflecting the common view from the lliberal left (that may not be reflected in a final bill):

http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/web/2010/04/21/pm-financial-reform-reich-commentary/

The bill now being considered in the Senate is a step in the right direction. But it omits three of the most important reforms.

First, it should require that all derivatives, that is bets on future asset prices, be traded on open exchanges where parties have to disclose what they're buying and selling and have enough capital to pay up if their bets go wrong. The exception in the current bill for so-called "customized" derivatives opens a loophole big enough for bankers to drive their Ferrari's through.

Second, the bill should resurrect the Glass-Steagall Act in its entirety so commercial banks are separated from investment banks. The current bill doesn't go nearly far enough. Commercial banks shouldn't be investing in the stock market, and investment banks shouldn't be taking in deposits. We learned this after the Great Crash of 1929, and then forgot it in 1999 when Glass-Steagall was repealed because Wall Street wanted to create financial supermarkets.

Third, the bill should cap the size of big banks at no more than $100 billion in assets. The current bill doesn't limit the size of banks at all. It creates a process for winding down the operations of a bank that gets into trouble. But if several big banks are threatened, as they were when the housing bubble burst, they'd almost certainly be bailed out. And knowing this they'll take bigger risks than they should. The only way to ensure no bank is too big to fail is to make sure no bank is too big, period.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)

Sales taxes and VATS are highly regressive. Given the amount of taxes people already pay in various States and Counties, it would have to be quite low.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

^^ that's true, but (someone, somewhere has claimed that) progressive spending priorities built on not-very-progressive taxation schemes are still net benefits for everyone.

i.e. it's better to do the work that needs doing and get the money where you can than worry about getting a tax regime that is 100% fair.

goole, Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

Most of the people who I've heard support the idea of a national VAT were Republicans.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 22 April 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

ha well i guess the distinction between VAT and "natl sales tax" is lost on me.

― goole, Thursday, April 22, 2010 2:56 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark

yeah, this is what i thought until i went to wikipedia and got double confused.

basically i can't see how VAT would do anything to raise revenue unless it was superimposed on already existing state sales tax.

thing is, the difference (as far as i can tell) between VAT and regular sales tax is a non-issue to Joe Consumer. it's supposed advantages are that a) it's federal and b) distributes the tax-y mark-up over several transactions in the supply chain instead of levying it all at the consumer's point of sale. the PRICE to the consumer stays the same, however, so who gives a shit. the difference between VAT and sales tax seems like serious inside baseball policy wonk bullshit. the only reason anyone should care imo is if a nat'l VAT is imposed in add'n to existing state sales tax.

in which case, it IS regressive, and (deservedly or not) is a guaranteed stillbirth

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:40 (fifteen years ago)

Depending on the value added to a sold product, the tax varies. Some simple products would have a far lower VAT than products that required lots of stages of value addition. VAT might bring in slightly more but it's usually harder (and more bureaucratic) to calculate than a national salez tax and in any case, even if it were 1% or even a fraction of a percent, the really hard sell for anything national is that (a) it's a new tax, and (b) it would require businesses in States that presently don't have a sales tax to re-gear their businesses to figure out what they owe the Feds.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

Of course, those States are Alaska, Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire, and Oregon so I'm not sure what kind of weight (b) would have, though it would conceivably complicate the books for any business owner.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

the PRICE to the consumer stays the same, however, so who gives a shit. the difference between VAT and sales tax seems like serious inside baseball policy wonk bullshit.

the burden of levying and passing on a sales tax is borne only by business who are the end seller. if you sell something to another business, you're exempt. arguably this is unfair -- you buy an ipod and apple has work to do; apple buys its little hard drives from sanyo and they don't have to do dick (glossing over the int'l bs here). VATs "spread the pain around" to the entire productive economy instead of gating everything at the moment of retail.

i gather one of the arguments in favor of VATs rather than sales taxes is better capture -- putting so much weight on one "spot" increases the incentives for black-market avoidance.

goole, Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

no i get all that, esp i gather one of the arguments in favor of VATs rather than sales taxes is better capture -- putting so much weight on one "spot" increases the incentives for black-market avoidance.

just that: try explaining that to voters. in-side base-ball. i think don's otm, at least w/r/t selling this to voters. or, to paraphrase something you said, VAT is just not a hill worth dying on, and the political costs to anyone suggesting it (which, it should be noted, isn't happening) would far outstrip any advantages it might have for the country.

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Thursday, 22 April 2010 21:58 (fifteen years ago)

I think the VAT is a good idea (a few percentage points at most, though, since the effect on the consumer would be marginal) since many corporations aren't paying ANY taxes but I also think this is conceivably the worst time possible to even float any balloons on the subject.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 22 April 2010 22:05 (fifteen years ago)

^^^ yeah

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Thursday, 22 April 2010 22:10 (fifteen years ago)

I will also add that the VAT is employed differently around the world--rates, collection, redemption, etc. I don't know for sure, but I'm guessing different countries have tried tweaking the system i.e. granting favors, trying to make things "fairer, etc.

The capture aspect is definitely an appealing factor, you are OTM about that goole.

As I have been trying to point out all along, the VAT is a fancy idea that is fucking politically retarded. It has been vetted. It is a unicorn. Yes, it is economically a possibility, but so are a million other things. It is a masturbatory fantasy right up there with starving the beast. It's moral value is incredibly low. Something called "value added tax" is going to poll lower than Klan meeting on the West Lawn.

One thing that has surprised me is that Barry has avoided tax increases on luxury items, such as vehicles that cost more than $XX,XXX or big fancy boats, or even homes that cost more than $XXX,XXX. I guess maybe he's trying to "get a better sense" of that, too.

Obama is awesome, awesome, awesome (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 22 April 2010 22:11 (fifteen years ago)

VAT = "very small tax on products, shared by everyone, even big business! nobody gets to slide out of this one."

if it were part of a "shared sacrifice" plan that included some relief on income taxes for (everyones favorite) Middle Class Families and promised to finally get the deficit in shape, i dunno, it could be sold. maybe. what do i know!

xp "Barry" lol i love that.

goole, Thursday, 22 April 2010 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

Further study indicates that Alaska does have sales taxes in some counties, just none statewide and Montana has a few tourist destinatiosns which do, too. Oregon, similarly leaves it up to localities. Delaware has a tax on gross receipts. New Hampshire only taxes a few categories of sales: prepared food, car rentals, room occupancy, electricity and phones.

Laboratory of democracy at work...

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 22 April 2010 22:15 (fifteen years ago)

prepared food, car rentals, room occupancy,

stick it to the out of towners!! fucking bullshit.

i think federalism is some garbage basically

goole, Thursday, 22 April 2010 22:17 (fifteen years ago)

dude he was known as Barry in college, back when he was doing lines and smoking weed. I always thought with that big smile, he looks like a dude named Barry.

lots of municipalities tax stuff differently. Try vacationing in Florida, for example.

I think a national sales tax would be fairly easy to pull off.

Obama is awesome, awesome, awesome (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, 22 April 2010 22:19 (fifteen years ago)

The only VAT ever used in the US was repealed in January of last year.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 22 April 2010 22:24 (fifteen years ago)

http://a2.vox.com/6a00d09e7bc293be2b00fa968aa1720003-500pi

velko, Thursday, 22 April 2010 22:28 (fifteen years ago)

was this the thread where people were having a hard time thinking up why more offshore drilling might be a bad idea

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 April 2010 22:36 (fifteen years ago)

pretty sure its "barry soetoro"

max, Thursday, 22 April 2010 22:36 (fifteen years ago)

favorite Dr Morbius primaries thread nickname

velko, Thursday, 22 April 2010 22:42 (fifteen years ago)

itt: "things barry is trying to get a better sense of"

fat mantis (Hunt3r), Thursday, 22 April 2010 22:59 (fifteen years ago)

more like a better sensimilla

velko, Thursday, 22 April 2010 23:01 (fifteen years ago)

dude he was known as Barry in college, back when he was doing lines and smoking weed.
― Obama is awesome, awesome, awesome (Dandy Don Weiner), Thursday, April 22, 2010 10:19 PM (Yesterday)

dude, we know.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 23 April 2010 00:04 (fifteen years ago)

I just wish that Obama would be honest about this issue--that he thinks we need to raise taxes somehow

Why start now?

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 23 April 2010 01:24 (fifteen years ago)

A dog bites man story

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/

DICK CHENEY'S GREATEST ACCOMPLISHMENT.... In 2004, a controversy over the Bush/Cheney administration and no-bid Halliburton contracts was just starting to grow, and Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt.), at the time the ranking Dem on the Senate Judiciary Committee, was pressing the issue.

But when it came time for an annual group photo on the Senate floor, Leahy chose to be gracious, and approached then-Vice President Dick Cheney in a friendly, collegial manner. As the senator approached, Cheney told Leahy, "Go f*ck yourself."

Instead of apologizing, Cheney ran off to Fox News soon after to boast about his classlessness, bragging about having "felt better after I had done it."

Yesterday, Cheney appeared on a conservative talk-radio show, and continued to crow about his behavior. When the far-right host gushed about how much he "loved that move," the former V.P. replied:

"You'd be surprised how many people liked that. That's sort of the best thing I ever did."

Eight years running the executive branch, and one of Dick Cheney's greatest accomplishments was gutter-talk with a respected U.S. senator. Sounds about right.

curmudgeon, Friday, 23 April 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)

gutter-talk

velko, Friday, 23 April 2010 14:30 (fifteen years ago)

Eight years running the executive branch, and one of Dick Cheney's greatest accomplishments was gutter-talk message-board talk with a respected U.S. senator. Sounds about right.

fixed

Nom Nom Nom Chomsky (WmC), Friday, 23 April 2010 14:36 (fifteen years ago)

Michael WHAT UP Steele apparently in trouble with the GOP again. Told some DePaul students that, because of the GOP's Southern Strategy, blacks haven't had very good reasons to vote for Republicans. The fallout is as predictable as it is infuriating.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 23 April 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)

Is Steele a Dem double agent or something?

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 23 April 2010 14:58 (fifteen years ago)

lol, that blog post referenced a blog post that referenced the actual news articles

HI DERE, Friday, 23 April 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

That's right, it's Friday and I'm making you work, damn it.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Friday, 23 April 2010 15:17 (fifteen years ago)

What kind of socialist is Barack Obama?

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 23 April 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

what does "hallmark" mean?

goole, Friday, 23 April 2010 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.harleydbrownforcongress.org/index.html

goole, Friday, 23 April 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

Full of gems, and here is one of many: Please consider sending a loud mouth passionate demolition expert to Washington DC.

yes we kenya (suzy), Friday, 23 April 2010 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

i coulda put this on the 'white ppl' thread

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/04/more_surrealism_at_the_new_bla.html

hell of a photo!

goole, Friday, 23 April 2010 19:19 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bgU7T2au2Wg&feature=player_embedded

what hath the dandies wrought?

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 23 April 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

chris ware's rejected fortune cover!!!

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/fortune500_big.jpg

(linked cos hueg)

goole, Friday, 23 April 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)

Hahah wonderful.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 23 April 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, I saw that earlier today. Love Ware even more now!

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 23 April 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

loooool

the first circus ringleader in space (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 23 April 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

We're at 5K posts again. Been a busy month.

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Saturday, 24 April 2010 08:40 (fifteen years ago)

well i think the first 1000 of those were making jokes about the thread title, and another thousand have literally had the word "teabagger" in them

my two percent's worth (k3vin k.), Saturday, 24 April 2010 11:59 (fifteen years ago)

LOVE this ad

http://vimeo.com/10896301

max, Saturday, 24 April 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

perfect distillation of resentful republican paranoia + racism + cartoonish action-movie politics complete w/ helicopter sound effects

max, Saturday, 24 April 2010 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

I say we just ignore them. The only thing TPers have contributed to public discourse is giving free material to an America news media that would rather sensationalize racist leanings of a silly fringe political party than report on actual policy. I bet if everyone boycotted TV shows, blogs, & websites that obsess over these (actually very few) idiots we would maybe hear more about what our politicians are doing to prevent the Great Depression III of 2018.

Adam Bruneau, Saturday, 24 April 2010 18:48 (fifteen years ago)

I am with you there; it's why I don't watch Keith Olbermann anymore. =-

kissogram powers (Abbott), Saturday, 24 April 2010 18:50 (fifteen years ago)

The kind of people that run the worldwide economy/our gov't:

For Goldman's 30,500 staff worldwide, the next few weeks are crucial. Insiders say clients, so far, have been supportive in spite of the SEC's accusations that Goldman misled investors with Abacus, a mortgage derivative allegedly designed to fail. If the SEC's prosecution is successful, Goldman risks huge damage to its reputation and could suffer an exodus of customers and staff.

The bank's defence has been hindered by the release of a batch of emails sent by Fabrice Tourre, who refers to himself as the 'Fabulous Fab', to his girlfriend, Marine Serres. In the emails, the originator of the Abacus deal intersperses expressions of love and affection with banter about CDOs. In the messages, Tourre jokes that he has been selling Abacus to "widows and orphans" at an airport and he is scornful about the financial package, describing it as "a product of pure intellectual masturbation" that has "no purpose" and is "absolutely conceptual".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/apr/25/emails-goldman-sachs-mortgage-defaults

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 25 April 2010 21:16 (fifteen years ago)

fab fab sounds like a fun guy.

Daniel, Esq., Sunday, 25 April 2010 23:19 (fifteen years ago)

He's very Dickensian.

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 25 April 2010 23:51 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.badrecordcovers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/milli-vanilli-robandfab.jpg

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 26 April 2010 00:01 (fifteen years ago)

oh dammit, I was going to write "more like Robber Rob" and post a Milli Vanilli picture

curse you, Pancakes Hackman (if, indeed, that's your REAL name)

LITERALLY FLATTEN HER WITH THE POWER OF YOUR MARRIAGE (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 00:04 (fifteen years ago)

My real name is Waffles McGee.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 26 April 2010 00:10 (fifteen years ago)

Crepes Schneider

Jack Human (kenan), Monday, 26 April 2010 04:29 (fifteen years ago)

Nice to see that finance "overhaul" is being whored to Warren Buffett:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748703441404575206252252365076.html

"Lawmakers began considering the Berkshire proposal after Sen. Nelson relayed concerns raised by David Sokol, chairman of Berkshire Hathaway subsidiary MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co., people familiar with the matter said. Mr. Sokol is a close lieutenant of Mr. Buffett and is considered his likely successor."

At least the White House has been trying (allegedly) to kill this measure.

Obama is awesome, awesome, awesome (Dandy Don Weiner), Monday, 26 April 2010 11:15 (fifteen years ago)

dude was aping Nixon's "Six Crises" format really the best you could come up with

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)

Bush has made few public appearances since leaving office more than 15 months ago and has yet to sit for a formal media interview. Instead, Crown says, he has spent "almost every day" reflecting on his presidency and writing the upcoming memoir.

tbf he did have to learn English first.

Obama, Wellstone and Darwinfish, Attorneys (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 26 April 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.twincities.com/national/ci_14960493?source=rss

...

LITERALLY FLATTEN HER WITH THE POWER OF YOUR MARRIAGE (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

With the GOP's current doublespeak mode of ignoring objective facts in favor of narrative, this will be a fun read where we learn that W actually prevented 9/11 and a democratic legislative majority single-handedly created the current financial crisis.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 26 April 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

hey! i just wanted to see the president and show him my gun!

max, Monday, 26 April 2010 15:58 (fifteen years ago)

http://news.yahoo.com/nphotos/police-mug-shot-provided-Buncombe-County-Sheriff-Office-Sunday-April/photo//100426/480/urn_publicid_ap_org72c519a2998c47b1a6da901d79ccf973//s:/ap/20100426/ap_on_re_us/us_obama_nc_airport_arrest

described by one of my singing friends as "a neo-Nazi Harry Potter"

LITERALLY FLATTEN HER WITH THE POWER OF YOUR MARRIAGE (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:02 (fifteen years ago)

going armed in terror of the public

never heard of this crime before tbh

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

bad show, Obama

Turkey should be made to eat shit on this count imho

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

granted it's strictly semantics but candidate Obama readily and specifically used the term genocide

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

Well that McVey guy sounds like a freak who needs some hobbies that don't involve fantasizing about being more powerful than he actually is, but OTOH it seems like there might be v simple reasons for him to have the sirens, lights, rifle formulas, etc, and tho it doesn't seem like it could be a coincidence that he was at the airport the pres had just left, he didn't actually DO anything at all...

Did I miss something more damning?

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:19 (fifteen years ago)

OTOH it seems like there might be v simple reasons for him to have the sirens, lights, rifle formulas, etc,

what are these simple reasons btw

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

I mean usually a dude with sniper gear near the president is not a good sign

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

Well, to play devil's advocate, dude liked to hang out on ham radio frequencies and monitor for emergencies, so it's not much of a stretch to imagine he tricked out his car like an emergency vehicles in case he had to be the responder.

The rifle formulas are the thing difficult to handwave here; you'd think that someone with benign reasons for meeting with the President unannounced/unscheduled would think about the image presented when showing up at an airport in a fake police car with a manual on how to adjust your sniper aim in various conditions.

LITERALLY FLATTEN HER WITH THE POWER OF YOUR MARRIAGE (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

i just wanted to see the president

...through my rifle scope

max, Monday, 26 April 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

the story is unclear whether they guy had a rifle. still, unfortunate name, isn't it.

anyway, i don't envy the president's position there. turkey is important! more important than armenia on any number of metrics. what are you supposed to say? it'd be nice if the turkish public had come to some kind of consensus peace with the genocide, but they haven't.

goole, Monday, 26 April 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

yeah it was pretty dumb of him to promise that hed call it a genocide during the campaign

max, Monday, 26 April 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

The article said that the rifle formulas are normally included with the box/packaging when you buy a scope or whatever. It could easily have been in his gun case or in some box or bag along with whatever other accessories or cleaning supplies come with gun parts these days -- I don't know about that stuff.

Article also said at the very end that he's involved in some kind of police-assistance group that directs traffic or something when the police are too busy with an emergency, which might explain the lights and sirens.

Besides, come to think of it, lights and sirens would seem to make a car MORE suspicious and noticeable, which doesn't seem very stealthy and sniper-like.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

Not that I don't want a possible domestic terrorist to bear the full brunt of the law, it's more that I'm suspicious of the news outlets' reporting-slash-scare tactics.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

Authorities did not say if McVey had a rifle or scope with him.

i mean, the story is perfectly clear that the cops were deliberately unclear about whether he had a rifle on him.

goole, Monday, 26 April 2010 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

yeah it was pretty dumb of him to promise that hed call it a genocide during the campaign

^^^this. did he not think he was gonna get called on it or something?

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

MAN WITH POSSIBLE TIES TO LAW-ENFORCEMENT AND LEGALLY DOCUMENTED FIREARMS IN POSSESSION DETAINED IN PUBLIC PLACE, NOT DOING ANYTHING just doesn't sell as many papers.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

or maybe O had not accounted for Israeli pressure re: Turkey...? I dunno.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:39 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, the story is perfectly clear that the cops were deliberately unclear about whether he had a rifle on him.

The story is clear about him having a weapon, though:

At about 2 p.m., airport police saw McVey get out of a maroon car with Ohio plates and had a sidearm, airport police Capt. Kevan Smith said.

LITERALLY FLATTEN HER WITH THE POWER OF YOUR MARRIAGE (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

presidents always wimp out big time when it comes to the Armenian genocide

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

iirc they scanned his drivers license and it turned out to be not legit

max, Monday, 26 April 2010 16:45 (fifteen years ago)

yeah that's always a good sign.

dudes like this creep me the f out no doubt.

goole, Monday, 26 April 2010 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

maybe he is one of those "sovereign citizen" guys, and so is the police force of himself

goole, Monday, 26 April 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

iirc they scanned his drivers license and it turned out to be not legit

^^^ this too

I mean, I'm from upper-midwest "oh everyone has a gun, what's the big deal" country as well, which to my mind makes the idea of a random citizen with a bogus driver's license and a sidearm casing an airport three states over from where he lives that the President recently left deeply, deeply suspicious

LITERALLY FLATTEN HER WITH THE POWER OF YOUR MARRIAGE (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

No, it says "a computer check failed to show the number was valid" which could mean almost ANYTHING but I notice that they specifically DID NOT say "a computer check showed that the number was invalid". Pretty much all the details of the story seem on par with that kind of evasion, which just makes me really suspicious.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.coshoctontribune.com/article/20100426/NEWS01/100426002

On policelink.monster.com, McVey wrote that his hobbies include "shooting, fishing, hunting, piano, trumpet (and) voice."

poll?

LITERALLY FLATTEN HER WITH THE POWER OF YOUR MARRIAGE (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:51 (fifteen years ago)

also: On his YouTube account, McVey has favorited more than 100 videos, including multiple law enforcement-related videos and one that allegedly shows U.S. soldiers accidentally killing civilians in Iraq.

uh

LITERALLY FLATTEN HER WITH THE POWER OF YOUR MARRIAGE (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

His Facebook page, which the Citizen-Times had limited access to, lists him as a fan of Asheville and, separately, as a fan of downtown Asheville.

lol journalism. friend the guy u hacks!!

goole, Monday, 26 April 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

C'mon, this guy is a total lame herring. He's just kind of nerdy and aspires to be a police officer for the cool tech, and his presence in a PARKING LOT far from the president or his plant or their entourage is giving law enforcement agencies a testosterone-fueled field day and/or the local news is enjoying making themselves momentarily relevant.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:55 (fifteen years ago)

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2010/04/26/2279264.aspx

ha

LITERALLY FLATTEN HER WITH THE POWER OF YOUR MARRIAGE (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:55 (fifteen years ago)

NB: I could be wrong and this could blow open the largest domestic terrorism drama since sliced bread, but I still think this is totally bogus police work & reporting.

xp haha

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

"plant" = "plane"

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

This morning, one official familiar with the investigation says McVey heard the president's plane was at the airport and wanted to see it take off.

Why I am reminded of the wimpy young plane freak from the MSTed San Francisco International.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 April 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

Example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeWSTjMARcg

Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 April 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

Hell I mean I'd want to see Air Force One take off if I were in the area, too!

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

I think the general point of "showing up in yr fake police car while wearing a gun and saying 'I wanna see the President' merits detainment by authorities until the figure out why you are so dumb" stands

LITERALLY FLATTEN HER WITH THE POWER OF YOUR MARRIAGE (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

I don't, because they just charged McVey with a misdemeanor for being in a public place with equipment he was licensed/authorized/trained to use, which is dumbshit police way of saying, "We were 100% wrong but our collective ego doesn't allow us to admit it, so that little guy without a real badge is gonna get it for something."

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)

naw hi here otm

goole, Monday, 26 April 2010 17:01 (fifteen years ago)

Asheville is pretty.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 26 April 2010 17:05 (fifteen years ago)

C'mon, he was probably on a trip away from Ohio, maybe chasing tornadoes, maybe something else nerdtastic, and he drove into the public parking lot a minute AFTER AF1 took off, so he missed the whole shebang anyway. What was he supposed to do, rent a storage locker in town and leave his police and radio gear in there while he stopped by a PARKING LOT for 10 minutes?

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:13 (fifteen years ago)

Apparently I love him, btw. I don't know why I give a shit, I just think the police were really lazy and unfair.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe he should have, say, left his gun in the car? Just a thought; I mean, why on Earth would security be extra-twitchy/sensitive... OH RIGHT THE PRESIDENT WAS JUST THERE.

LITERALLY FLATTEN HER WITH THE POWER OF YOUR MARRIAGE (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:15 (fifteen years ago)

xp: you are bewitched by his Harry Potteresque charms, apparently

LITERALLY FLATTEN HER WITH THE POWER OF YOUR MARRIAGE (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:16 (fifteen years ago)

the thing is that while im sympathetic what youre saying laurel i find it hard to believe that a dude who is enough into guns and police shit to buy a gun and buy police shit is not also aware enough of the protocol in these situations to not see why what he was doing was... not smart

max, Monday, 26 April 2010 17:16 (fifteen years ago)

eh this could be one of those "never attribute to malice what could be attributed to stupidity" kind of situations. but still, well worth figuring out what he thinks he's up to. you never know...

goole, Monday, 26 April 2010 17:19 (fifteen years ago)

the thing is that while im sympathetic what youre saying laurel i find it hard to believe that a dude who is enough into guns and police shit to buy a gun and buy police shit is not also aware enough of the protocol in these situations to not see why what he was doing was... not smart

... unless, of course, dude is really, really, really stupid, and quite frankly if our police force is going to overstep on something, "detaining really, really, really stupid armed people who are attempting to get closer to elected officials" is a line I'm okay with

LITERALLY FLATTEN HER WITH THE POWER OF YOUR MARRIAGE (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i mean thats the implication. this guy was either crazy or dumb. happy to believe hes just dumb. but id rather the police figure it out.

max, Monday, 26 April 2010 17:22 (fifteen years ago)

I just think the police were really lazy and unfair.

Not saying that this is fair, but local law enforcement freaking out about any potential threat to the Pres doesn't strike me as all that odd. Being caught after a real attempt on the President's life with having under-estimated the danger strikes me as the kind of thing they're far more likely to worry about.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)

"You have to go now!"

who's always getting head from the commissioner (Eric H.), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)

Or what Dan said...

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)

All he did was GET OUT OF HIS CAR with the gun on. There's no sign that he tried to go into a building or even speak to anyone. Maybe they just got to him soon enough that he didn't have time but the reporting is totally steering you away from that possibility.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)

Sorry, meant that they're steering readers away from the other possibility: that he was just an interested dude stretching his legs to watch a plane take off.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:25 (fifteen years ago)

it's still a massively stupid thing to do and I don't blame the police for detaining him one bit

LITERALLY FLATTEN HER WITH THE POWER OF YOUR MARRIAGE (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

an interested dude, with a gun and a walkie talkie and out-of-state plates, stretching his legs to watch a plane take off

max, Monday, 26 April 2010 17:29 (fifteen years ago)

After 4 dead presidents and a couple of shooting attempts, anyone dumb enough or provocative enough to even come close to this kind of thing is likely to get taught a little lesson about how serious l/e is about preventing any further threats and dissuading anybody remotely interested in making them.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

sometimes stupidity is grounds for arrest

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

"You have to go now!"

Hahah

Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 April 2010 17:32 (fifteen years ago)

I don't blame them for detaining him but a) shut the hell UP, retarded news media, and b) do not make the dude GO TO COURT and plead about some charges after you've figured out that he was harmless.

There's a culture in law enforcement where you can't just say, "So you can go now, no hard feelings but we had to check you out, you know?" and just let the dude walk, and still be perceived as having done your job correctly. It should be okay to detain people and check into their stories but then you have to be fair them if and when they turn out to be no one.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:34 (fifteen years ago)

millions of minority teenagers would agree

GREAT JOB Mushroom head (gbx), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:35 (fifteen years ago)

being harmless <> not committing a crime

I've been hassled by officials (police, park rangers) for being young and black a couple of times but I was never actually charged with anything because I wasn't actually breaking any laws. Maybe this makes me unfairly unsympathetic towards this guy but, given that he rolled up on an airport several states away from home wearing a gun and with an unverifiable license, I am not at all bothered by him being charged with a misdemeanor.

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:38 (fifteen years ago)

yeah whatever dude cops a ticket, pays a fine, what's the big deal

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

an interested dude, with a gun and a walkie talkie and out-of-state plates, stretching his legs to watch a plane take off

in fairness this was what it said under my senior picture in my high school yearbook

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

Whatever that charge was that they "got" him on, it sounded bogus to me, and I'm pretty sure every jurisdiction has some kind of catch-all category of misdemeanor they can use to give someone a hard time if they really want to.

I feel like he didn't get a chance to be innocent until proven guilty, and making someone go to court and pay a fine for doing NOTHING illegal seems wrong and unfair and like an unworthy use of power, to me.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:45 (fifteen years ago)

guy sits in airport parking lot in fake-o police car, with gun, ham radio, other gun, radio and fake-cop enthusiast gear. president is in the area.

secret service picks the guy up and talks to him, because, come on.

after his DL doesn't check out, local police hold on to him.

local press talks to local police, ask if anything funny happened today. police say, yes, we had an armed guy from out of town in the airport parking lot when obama was around.

press says o rly? is he dangerous? police say weeeelll maybe. scope calculations!

goole, Monday, 26 April 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe I have more of an inner libertarian than I thought. o_O

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:50 (fifteen years ago)

the true-blue libertarians would say that even if he was trying to kill the president the cops had no right to mess with him. politicians have to live in fear of their constituents etc etc

goole, Monday, 26 April 2010 17:53 (fifteen years ago)

okay I have been out of touch with libertarianism for a really long time but when did it gallop across the line from "aggressively selfish" to "holy nutbags, you are fucking crazy"

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

When the druid ran for office out here in 2002:

http://www.weeklyuniverse.com/2002/copeland.htm

Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 April 2010 17:58 (fifteen years ago)

so.... 2002?

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

Works for me!

Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 April 2010 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

I just have a feeling that if you want to be the head of a fair society where people can be trusted, you have to be fair and trust them (within some limits) even if that puts the decision-maker(s) at some increased risk. I guess the boundaries for acceptable values of "some limits" are the issue here huh.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

well there's the reason-mag style markety libertarianism, and randian i'm-the-true-king-of-the-universe superman libertarianism, and ron paul goldbug ish.

and then there's all that truly wild christian anarchist stuff.

xps whoa

goole, Monday, 26 April 2010 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

has anybody got anything else to say about Obama vs. the Armenian genocide or is the non-story at the airport the main thing

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:01 (fifteen years ago)

The latter, obv.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

IMO they're both non-stories

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

in one, someone stupid did something stupid and was detained and charged

in the other, our head of state basically did everything but use the word "genocide" to condemn what happened to the Armenian people, including using the Armenian phrase for it

in summation: slow news day

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

it's like no one can bear to talk more about "Avatar" so we're basically left with this

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

has anybody got anything else to say about Obama vs. the Armenian genocide or is the non-story at the airport the main thing

― brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, April 26, 2010 2:01 PM (43 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

it was a dumb thing for him to promise to do, its a stupid thing that we cant piss off turkey by being real, i wonder the extent to which that decision is being made based on the positive steps toward normalizing turkish-armenian diplomatic relations that were taken last year

max, Monday, 26 April 2010 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

Oh so people still believe in collective responsibility, eh.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I think it's a worthwhile thing. here is what the president said:

I also share with Armenian Americans so many of whom are descended from genocide survivors - a principled commitment to commemorating and ending genocide. That starts with acknowledging the tragic instances of genocide in world history. As a U.S. Senator, I have stood with the Armenian American community in calling for Turkey's acknowledgement of the Armenian Genocide. Two years ago, I criticized the Secretary of State for the firing of U.S. Ambassador to Armenia, John Evans, after he properly used the term "genocide" to describe Turkey's slaughter of thousands of Armenians starting in 1915. I shared with Secretary Rice my firmly held conviction that the Armenian Genocide is not an allegation, a personal opinion, or a point of view, but rather a widely documented fact supported by an overwhelming body of historical evidence. The facts are undeniable. An official policy that calls on diplomats to distort the historical facts is an untenable policy. As a senator, I strongly support passage of the Armenian Genocide Resolution (H.Res.106 and S.Res.106), and as President I will recognize the Armenian Genocide.

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

my guess is it has more to do with not further aggravating Obama's rocky relationship with Israel

xp

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

What does calling it a genocide have to do with Israel?

Also: If Obama called the Holocaust the Shoah and not the Holocaust, I can't imagine anyone would have any complaints. If anything, using the Armenian term conveys everything they cultural/socially/politically feel about the issue, while genocide places it in some broader non-Armenian historical context. It could be I'm wrong (I'm not totally up on Armenian positions on the genocide) but it seems to me that using that phrase to describe it is going a step further than calling it a genocide.

Mordy, Monday, 26 April 2010 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

I agree it is stupid that we can't risk saying something obv true, because it would piss off the Turks, who seem not to like being called genocidal to thier faces. But, other than making someone feel good because the Turks got tagged, what is the upside for the USA for taking on this fight? What do we win, if we "win" this argument?

Aimless, Monday, 26 April 2010 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

a pony

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQ41hqlV0Kk

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:13 (fifteen years ago)

What does calling it a genocide have to do with Israel?

Israeli gov't has actively worked against the recognition of the Armenian Genocide since at least 1982, when they tried to force Eli Wiesel to exclude Armenian scholars from the international conference on the Holocaust and Genocide. The thinking is both that a) Israel needs the support of the Turkish gov't, and the Turkish gov't obviously doesn't want to fess up to this, thus the Israelis' stand by them whenever this issue comes up; and b) they feel that acknowledging that the Holocaust was not the first genocide of the 20th century (assisted/engineered by Nazis no less) would somehow detract from the Holocaust's overall historical importance.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

it's like no one can bear to talk more about "Avatar" so we're basically left with this

Come now; the Abbott & Costello TV series just came out on DVD!

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

it has to do with official recognition, not just use of the term.

as President I will recognize the Armenian genocide.

this is unambiguous. it's also a campaign promise, so ha-ha on anybody who believed a word of it, right, but "as President I will recognize" something = supporting something lik ethis instead of actively objecting to it

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

What do we win, if we "win" this argument

sometimes honesty is its own reward. also Armenians would love us forever.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

official american recognition of the genocide would likely open up some (possibly small) degree of space for turkish dissidents

max, Monday, 26 April 2010 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

who currently live in one of the least free speech-friendly democracies

max, Monday, 26 April 2010 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

sometimes honesty is its own reward

This is a thorny idea to introduce into diplomatic relations. Next we'll be telling the Tongans they are a bunch of fat slobs, and the Chinese they are a rapacious bunch of sneeks.

Aimless, Monday, 26 April 2010 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

btw I'm not idly bringing up Nazis there. Years afterwards, iirc Hitler made some reference to the Armenian genocide as providing an example of how the Jews could be erased from Europe. And obviously at the time the German military were complicit in the collapsing Ottoman Empire's extermination efforts - they built the railroads used for the genocide, for example.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

point taken but saying it in english makes it more real for non armenian speakers, which is partly what the armenian community would like; that this is accepted as a genocide by people who are not armenian. Calling it genocide in armenian is good for them but meaningless to 95% of the US population. Anyway, at least he said something. He should say more. Maybe at some point he will.

akm, Monday, 26 April 2010 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

several xposts there

akm, Monday, 26 April 2010 18:26 (fifteen years ago)

lotta angry ppl from glendale on my facebook feed today

max, Monday, 26 April 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

What does calling it a genocide have to do with Israel?

Actually, considering that Avigdor Lieberman has gotten into some needless verbal tussles w/Turkey (once a staunch ally) and that Erdogan is hitting back and that Israel is now cutting arms sales to them, and that Turkey has evolved away from its prior vigorously secular stance to one where the AKP (and Erdogan) gets elected since 2002, and that Turkey is again receiving Iraqi oil all, Obama is probably trying to avoid stirring shit up.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:28 (fifteen years ago)

Today is a day to reflect upon and draw lessons from these terrible events. I have consistently stated my own view of what occurred in 1915, and my view of that history has not changed. It is in all of our interest to see the achievement a full, frank and just acknowledgment of the facts.

this is some classic politician garbage - "since I have consistently stated my own view, there's no need for me to reiterate it now that I'm president and my views might actually carry some force with them"

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

idk. Some of this is based in reception. If people made the claim that he was bringing forth his views that it's a genocide unequivocally, that he was referencing those views when he said, "my view of that history has not changed," and when he used the Armenian term, then it would have the affect of him literally calling it a genocide. I don't see the value in reporting this story as if his not using that word means he's backing off that position. We have some responsibility as the audience to create a context where what he says has the force of what we need it to mean.

Mordy, Monday, 26 April 2010 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

boy i'm glad i don't have to manage any relationships in the eastern mediterranean

goole, Monday, 26 April 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

In the general scheme of things, broken campaign promises that I can live with include things like "using every word in the dictionary except for 'genocide' to refer to the Armenian genocide"

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

it's not like this is even fifth on my list of important shit to grouse about but "I will recognize," as I say, has very specific political meaning. It's not about what language he'll use to describe it himself; it has to do with the United States officially recognizing that a genocide occurred, and that there's been an historical movement to specifically not call it genocide. And about the President, in his capacity as the leader of the United States, seeing to it that the U.S. leads the world in recognizing the Armenian genocide. This isn't about niceties. It's about the political fact of recognizing something, the official act. The speech is actually secondary here; the voa link above points out that the Obama administration is now actively opposing recognition of the genocide.

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, 26 April 2010 18:57 (fifteen years ago)

Joint Base Salad

max, Monday, 26 April 2010 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

that's "Salád"

goole, Monday, 26 April 2010 19:00 (fifteen years ago)

The Ballad of Joint Base Balad

nabisco infiltrator (J0rdan S.), Monday, 26 April 2010 19:00 (fifteen years ago)

G.O.P. Readies a Rival Bill on Financial Regulation

I assume it looks something like this:

1. impose regulations
2. ???
3. profit

mayor jingleberries, Monday, 26 April 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

GOP Spread Eagles for Financial Lobbyists

Aimless, Monday, 26 April 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

(assisted/engineered by Nazis no less)

This is maybe pedantic but: the Nazis didn't exist as a party yet and wouldn't be in control of Germany for nearly two decades. Didn't know that about the railroad-building, but that would be under the second German Reich, not the Third.

You're correct about Hitler citing it later as an example of how easy it is to get away with these things, though.

Doctor Casino, Monday, 26 April 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

All he did was GET OUT OF HIS CAR with the gun on.
― wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, April 26, 2010 5:24 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark

and then ask to speak to the President.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 26 April 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)

Didn't we already do this whole discussion on a thread about "don't taze me bro" or a girl carrying a fake bomb into an airport or something like that?

Doctor Casino, Monday, 26 April 2010 21:18 (fifteen years ago)

Meanwhile, Nelson just joined the GOP filibuster against wall street reform.

biologically wrong (Z S), Monday, 26 April 2010 21:22 (fifteen years ago)

that sucks. means the GOP will be able to say there's "bipartisan opposition" to the bill.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 26 April 2010 21:22 (fifteen years ago)

This is maybe pedantic but: the Nazis didn't exist as a party yet and wouldn't be in control of Germany for nearly two decades. Didn't know that about the railroad-building, but that would be under the second German Reich, not the Third.

yeah I know fair point

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)

Meanwhile, Nelson just joined the GOP filibuster against wall street reform.

What was his price for Health Care reform? $100M?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Monday, 26 April 2010 21:30 (fifteen years ago)

It's strange to have to remind myself that this isn't even a vote on the bill, it's a vote to proceed to the bill. Gee, Nelson+GOP must believe that financial reform is so unconscionable that it simply cannot be voted on.

Fix our broken senate, plz

biologically wrong (Z S), Monday, 26 April 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

has he given a reason for his opposition?

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 26 April 2010 21:37 (fifteen years ago)

he's from nebraska

goole, Monday, 26 April 2010 21:38 (fifteen years ago)

"I am a pathetic, empty man, compromised beyond all dignity. When I look into the mirror I see a pathetic ghost with hot dog jelly roll cheeks. I am a Nebraskan."

biologically wrong (Z S), Monday, 26 April 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

CNN reports that Nelson sez he's worried "this legislation will adversely impact main street when the focus needs to be on wall street...I don't think everyone is aware of the unintended consequences."

biologically wrong (Z S), Monday, 26 April 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

He then added, "wait, hold the phone - which one is wall street and which is main street again? I keep mixing them up this week durnit. Also what does 'adversely' mean? Last time I'll ask, promise."

biologically wrong (Z S), Monday, 26 April 2010 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

what he means: "you already showed me you will bow to the first Democrat who asks for concessions. I can veer as far right as I want, you guys have no spines at all. fuck u, pay me, sincerely yrs, Nelson, O btw Bart Stupak is right behind me"

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, 26 April 2010 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

^^^otm

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 21:55 (fifteen years ago)

And Lieberman is licking his lips in disgusting anticipation.

biologically wrong (Z S), Monday, 26 April 2010 21:56 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/04/oracle_of_omaha_has_nelsons_ear.php

this is kinda what i meant when i said "he's from nebraska"

goole, Monday, 26 April 2010 22:27 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, berkshire hathaway IS "main street" in nebraska. i wonder what % of nebraska's GDP is made up of BRK.A, shudder

goole, Monday, 26 April 2010 22:35 (fifteen years ago)

lol goole massively otm, for a lotta ppl "nebraska" = "dumb rubes out there" but the point is $$$

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, 26 April 2010 22:38 (fifteen years ago)

hey I wonder if Nelson will be stripped of any committees or forced to pay any political price whatsoever for this wait lemme guess that would be too extreme

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, 26 April 2010 22:44 (fifteen years ago)

The thing is, even if Nelson would've voted Aye they would've ended up with 59 votes. So even if Nelson pulls a, er, Nelson and holds his vote for ransom, Dems are still gonna have to find a GOP vote.

biologically wrong (Z S), Monday, 26 April 2010 23:29 (fifteen years ago)

still, maaaaaaaaaaaaaaan what a fucker.

biologically wrong (Z S), Monday, 26 April 2010 23:30 (fifteen years ago)

I believe the term you are looking for is "cornholer"

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 23:31 (fifteen years ago)

I bet they'll give in to Nelson's demands--making exceptions for billionaire Warren Buffet and for his alleged increased "small business" protections. Ugh.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:33 (fifteen years ago)

Did anyone hear the This Amer. Life story on Steve Poizner, California GOP candidate for GOV this last weekend?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Poizner

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)

/derailed

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:41 (fifteen years ago)

i don't know, is it warm and quirky?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:44 (fifteen years ago)

it's actually a pretty fair piece of journalism on Ira Glass' part about a guy who might not be a liar or a racist, but might be a non-truth-teller (fibber) and who is an elitist.

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 12:53 (fifteen years ago)

haha ok - i give ol' ira a tough time, it's because he has stolen my warm and quirky schtick.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 14:00 (fifteen years ago)

Wuirky

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)

The thing is, even if Nelson would've voted Aye they would've ended up with 59 votes. So even if Nelson pulls a, er, Nelson and holds his vote for ransom, Dems are still gonna have to find a GOP vote.

― biologically wrong (Z S), Monday, April 26, 2010 6:29 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark[

ried voted no himself as a procedural matter, it means he can call another vote on the same matter. if nelson had voted yes they would have had 60.

goole, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:12 (fifteen years ago)

Liveblog of the Goldman stuff today:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/richard-adams-blog/2010/apr/27/goldman-sachs-senate-hearing-live-blog

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

Levin's open statement isn't pulling any punches: "The firm's own documents show it was placing large bets against the US mortgage market," says Levin. "The firm has denied making those bets, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary."

The he gets to the nub of the SEC case against Goldman: that Goldmans' clients had a "reasonable expectation" that the bank would not sell products that it did not want to succeed. "Those were reasonable expectations," says Levin. But were they? That's the $1bn question.

It's kind of odd to think that a banking/credit/investment business could continue on if it's proven that any and all of their products could secretly be failures. How does this not increase the risk of doing business with Goldman? Or is that their whole strategy? They're still around so they must be doing something right...

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

Levin is now reading out internal Goldmans emails: "Boy, that Timberwolf was one shitty deal," reads one. "How much of that shitty deal did you sell to your clients?" wonders Levin.

"You knew it was a shitty deal and you didn't tell your clients," Levin tells Sparks. "Does that bother you at all?" Sparks goes down the Reagan route in his defence: "I don't recall," he says.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v134/tracerhand/AZ.jpg

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

right wingers now up in arms today about protests that saw some bottles thrown at cops in AZ -- tea parties, non violent; mexicans, violent!!

goole, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

good one two punch from ioz today

http://whoisioz.blogspot.com/2010/04/police-states.html

http://whoisioz.blogspot.com/2010/04/springtime-for-goldberg.html

goole, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:55 (fifteen years ago)

carl levin, nsfw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jACostBxlno

goole, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

senate needed more swearing imho

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:17 (fifteen years ago)

omg, awesome "Okay, you're tryin' to sell a shitty deal. And it's your top priority."

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

senate needs less lieberman

Aimless, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:29 (fifteen years ago)

McCaskill's shrillness/hectoring was NAGL.

Nom Nom Nom Chomsky (WmC), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

in case it isn't obvious, this is all just showboating, some fireworks to stoke public anger and pressure Republicans to pass the financial reform bill

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:35 (fifteen years ago)

mccaskills facial expressions, a+++++++++++++

max, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:35 (fifteen years ago)

this is all just showboating, some fireworks to stoke public anger

C'mon, Shakey, those internal GS memos had fuses just begging to be lit.

tbf, GS (and Wall Street generally) have been cranking just as hard on the public relations machine as they know how to. They are making every effort to strike the most noble and innocent pose they can manage. Why let them do that unimpeded, when you have plenty of cracking good ammo to fire back?

Aimless, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

my post was not a criticism, just a statement of fact. empty posturing is still empty posturing, no matter what side it's coming from. let's not act like there's really any surprises being brought to light here.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)

Political theater may be theatrical, but it is rarely empty.

Aimless, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

haha fair enough

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

Id rather hear about the misdeeds of this company that the public gave tons of money to than some senator's sex scandal or some other irrelevant distraction.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

although as far as empty theater goes I'd love to see that vid re-cut with Willy Wonka's rant at the end of the original Wonkafilm - "YOU STOLE Fizzy Lifting Drinks!"

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

ried voted no himself as a procedural matter, it means he can call another vote on the same matter. if nelson had voted yes they would have had 60.

― goole, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:12 (5 hours ago)

No. No republican voted yes, therefore it's not breaking the filibuster.

http://senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=2&vote=00124

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

Yep, just about to post that. Dems ended up with 57 votes, right? So adding Nelson and Reid is still only 59. Point being, even if they kiss Nelson's cornhole to obtain his vote, they're still going to have to persuade a republican to vote for it.

biologically wrong (Z S), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 21:15 (fifteen years ago)

not sure who they're hoping for at this point either - altho a bunch of Rep senators were publicly down with this bill prior to McConnell's arm-twisting letter and the actual vote

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)

time to let them *actually* filibuster imo

iatee, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 21:22 (fifteen years ago)

Every article I've read today suggests that this is shadowplay -- Reid's already got the votes, including the Republicans who are going along with it (Shelby hinted as much). Reid is allowing McConnell room to save face with the base.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 21:27 (fifteen years ago)

Reid is allowing McConnell room to save face with the base.

what motivation could Reid possibly have for doing this

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 21:31 (fifteen years ago)

maybe was the deal to get the votes in the first place? (just a guess, I haven't read whatever alfred has)

iatee, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 21:33 (fifteen years ago)

Exactly.

Here's a good summary: http://www.slate.com/id/2251999/

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

lol so this Goldman Sachs showboating WAS even emptier than I thought

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

It was a shitty deal, yes.

WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 22:05 (fifteen years ago)

The purpose of the "showboating" was to gain public support. The purpose of taking a vote was to make it plain to the public that, even with a strong majority, the bill will gho down because of Republican obstructionism.

This is not empty posturing. The bill is the result of extensive hearings and political compromise, undertaken to fill a crying need for better regulation. If the public agrees, and the record is plain, this could affect the midterm election. If the R's lose still further support, or an R senator gets cold feet, it saves the bill.

Look closer Shakey. This is how the Congress works (or doesn't) these days. But the Dems who formed the bill worked damn hard at it. That ain't showboating. That's attempting to govern.

Aimless, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 00:47 (fifteen years ago)

this is how Congress has always worked; the difference is Politico and cable news exposure.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 00:49 (fifteen years ago)

btw as usual the Dems have done a pathetic job educating the public. The Goldman Sachs indictments was a godsend for them.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 00:49 (fifteen years ago)

The last word should go to Carl Levin, from his grilling of Blankfein: "They're buying something from you – and you are betting against it. And you want people to trust you. I wouldn't trust you."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/richard-adams-blog/2010/apr/27/goldman-sachs-senate-hearing-live-blog

Even if nothing happens in the crooked old US it's important to remember this hearing was broadcast on TV around the world, and GS has fucked over a number of countries, and even if they get away from the US with a fee and a slap on the wrist, this public hearing will hopefully be enough evidence for the sane rest of the world to turn on them.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 06:38 (fifteen years ago)

wtf Arizona w/the assholism exacta

http://www.towleroad.com/2009/09/arizona-governor-takes-away-state-domestic-partner-benefits-says-god-has-placed-me-in-this-powerful-.html

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:35 (fifteen years ago)

Oh yeah, it's moved well beyond 'trifecta' as a descriptor, hasn't it?

yes we kenya (suzy), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:38 (fifteen years ago)

daily show called it 'meth lab of democracy'

max, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:39 (fifteen years ago)

? exacta is two, trifecta is three - do they have a third one this week?

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:40 (fifteen years ago)

(tracks of repute didn't used to fuck with the trifecta but in the wake of pick 6 coming to Santa Anita every dumb sucker bet on the planet is allowed everywhere)

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:40 (fifteen years ago)

domestic partner benefits + xenophobic police-state law + birther citizenship test

max, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:42 (fifteen years ago)

I saw 'meth lab of democracy' and it seemed he was mentioning at least 4 different stupid bigoted birthy bullshit bills, yes?

yes we kenya (suzy), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:43 (fifteen years ago)

maybe so I was just looking at the big 2 in the news - immigration & now repealing domestic benefits

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 12:50 (fifteen years ago)

Meanwhile in Rush Limbaugh-land (and on local W. DC area tabloid The Examiner) Obama is accused of playing the race card:

The 2010 turnout campaign will serve to rally the troops for a Democratic Congress and down-ticket races with two byproducts: If the DNC can rekindle the Obama '08 spark, it will provide helpful political muscle to congressional Democrats at risk for supporting the Obama agenda and will keep the rank and file mobilized for Obama's 2012 re-election bid.

The kickoff came Monday in a Web video message from Obama. In the video, the president mentioned a first-time voter from Phoenix, real estate agent Claudia Schulz, then made a special pitch to "young people, African-Americans, Latinos, and women," which prompted radio host Rush Limbaugh to accuse Obama of playing a race card.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:24 (fifteen years ago)

isn't he supposed to leave the country

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:26 (fifteen years ago)

he does leave the country - when he runs out of viagra & oxies

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 13:40 (fifteen years ago)

isn't he supposed to leave the country

too fat to fly. plus where's he gonna go, socialist Europe/Canada? And Mexico is filled with Mexicans.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

You guys are assuming Palm Beach County isn't another country.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think any other country in the world would buy Rush's BS, and he knows it.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

Third time's a charm. The Republican campaign of glorious obstructionism marches on.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/28/republicans-block-finance-bill-again/?partner=rss&emc=rss

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:13 (fifteen years ago)

alfred you have to keep us up to date with charlie crist lols

goole, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:40 (fifteen years ago)

Here's one you probably know:

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/04/crist_to_bolt_gop.php?ref=fpblg

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.myfriendcharlie.com/

goole, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

Dear Arizona,

You can just go ahead and secede now.

Love,

Sane, Rational America

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.myfriendcharlie.com/

― goole, Thursday, April 29, 2010 12:46 AM (58 minutes ago)

I kept waiting for a monster to jump on screen with a scary loud scream or something.

Johnny Fever, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 20:46 (fifteen years ago)

What if this turns into Arizona's equivalent to California's Prop 187? This might blow up in the GOP's face over the long haul.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)

yessss, that's the ticket. secession. let the hate flow through you.

(will) (will), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

What do you want me to say? "Way to go Arizona for your batshit, backwards-looking, fearmongering new law!".

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:22 (fifteen years ago)

"lawS"

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:22 (fifteen years ago)

oh hey i'm not criticizing you at all. i'm a huge advocate of secession!

(will) (will), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

What if this turns into Arizona's equivalent to California's Prop 187? This might blow up in the GOP's face over the long haul.

I dunno how likely this is - CA had sizeable latino and liberal demographics that were hell-bent against this measure, I don't know if there's anything comparable in AZ...?

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:30 (fifteen years ago)

30% of their pop is hispanic iirc

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:30 (fifteen years ago)

hispaniirc

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:31 (fifteen years ago)

i realize it's just my super commie gay liberal pipe dream that all these jackasses go teabag each other somewhere else and let the adults get on with the business of running a 21st century nation but hey

(will) (will), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:35 (fifteen years ago)

There's nary a state in the Union that at some point hasn't fallen prey to batshittery and the like. I think that suggesting secession is about as rational as these laws we deplore. Never fear, over the long haul, this shit will create enough blowback to wreak havoc on the Arizona GOP . I kind of hope Hayworth wins and the Republicans officially become the party of Crazy.

Shakey, according to this Salon piece, Brewer is more popular than ever but 15% of the population is Hispanic.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:37 (fifteen years ago)

Besides, if these evil states seceded, we'd turn on each other (which, I know, sounds like fun).

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:39 (fifteen years ago)

the thing I am hating the most about this is that, if Cinemax logic holds true here, at some point we are going to end up making out with Arizona and dry-umping the small of its back

I am not looking forward to that

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:40 (fifteen years ago)

I was like 4% serious about Arizona seceding, just sometimes I get so sick of these idiotic maneuvers that I feel like saying, "you know what, just go off and do your thing elsewhere then".

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:40 (fifteen years ago)

Never fear, over the long haul, this shit will create enough blowback to wreak havoc on the Arizona GOP... Brewer is more popular than ever but 15% of the population is Hispanic.

it's just that the Democratic Party in California has ALWAYS been powerful, even when we had Republican governors. Has any Democrat ever won anything ever in Arizona?

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

Apparently the Republicans have caved on financial reform already:

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/04/republicans-relent-will-let-debate-begin.php?ref=fpa

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/28/pima-county-sheriff-calls_n_555895.html

Pima County Sheriff Calls Arizona Law "Stupid," Will Not Enforce It

Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik called the law "racist" and "disgusting" and "stupid" and, in his "nuanced judgment" could not be enforced without mandatory racial profiling.

President Keyes, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

Yay Tucson

President Keyes, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

lol I totally forgot about Bruce Babbitt

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:45 (fifteen years ago)

The batshittery will continue to escalate imo. Specter bailed, Crist is bailing and the rump of GOP base has been getting more and more angry and less and less rational and you have to get through them to win primaries; Arizona w/the immigrant bashing and the birther law, Oklahoma w/the abortion restrictions, etc...

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

Apparently the Republicans have caved on financial reform already:

Hence the shadowplay.

Senate Republicans announced this afternoon that they will allow financial reform legislation onto the chamber floor for a debate after bipartisan talks hit an impasse.

Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL), ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee who has been in bipartisan negotiations with chairman Chris Dodd, released a statement announcing talks could go no further.

"We have been unable, however, to make any meaningful progress on other important components of the legislation. It is now my belief that further negotiations will not produce additional results," Shelby wrote.

TRANSLATION: "We have done what we wanted -- posture for our base. Now we go along with what we always knew needed to happen, or at least to keep us from gaining more seats in November."

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

cannot get over how much McConnell looks like some sort of sweaty bug-eyed blob creature

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 21:58 (fifteen years ago)

What is it with the coffee in the Senate cafeteria that turns senators into crustaceans?

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 22:00 (fifteen years ago)

Hmm, I got over that years ago. I also got over giving him the benefit of the doubt on almost anything.

xpost

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 22:02 (fifteen years ago)

Is it time for them to update "By the Time I Get to Arizona" yet?

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 22:15 (fifteen years ago)

New thread title^^^^^^

yes we kenya (suzy), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 22:58 (fifteen years ago)

No matter how dumb Repubs ideas seem, Dems keep shooting themselves in the foot--a Washington Post article this morning on the likelihood that the Republicans will get Obama and Biden's old US Senate seats.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:55 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, for people who are apparently better at managing symbolism, this is avoidable and they should do whatever they can to avoid it.

yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 12:58 (fifteen years ago)

eh. delaware is kind of to be expected; mike castle is extraordinarily popular there and even if beau biden ran hed have a hard time.

illinois, well. sigh.

max, Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:00 (fifteen years ago)

guys have a little faith in the campaigning machine, it's only April & not sure still has 13% of the vote

I'll leave somebody else to pick the idiocracy .jpg

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:08 (fifteen years ago)

The latest 5 to 4 Supreme Court decision on church/state bugs me. Right-wing judicial activists will take extraordinary steps to insist that Christian crosses are ok on federal land.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/28/AR2010042801949.html

curmudgeon, Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:20 (fifteen years ago)

x-post-Oh, here's the Washington Post article on the Illinois and Delaware seats (and others)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/28/AR2010042803498.html

curmudgeon, Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)

amaaaaazing:

http://iowaindependent.com/32926/install-microchips-in-illegal-immigrants-gop-candidate-says

rapping about space and shit, floatin’ around in an orgy of screen savers (gbx), Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)

wow, i like the iowa independent.

[State Sen. Brad Zaun] also contended that immigrants in the country illegally receive government services, like education and health care, and typically aren’t helping pay to support those services.

But that isn’t true. ...

"But that isn't true." When's the last time you heard that in the New York Times, outside of the Op-Ed pages??

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 29 April 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)

yeah all those sites are great -- the MN independent has a lot of staffers that fled from the village voice free rag after the new times takeover

IA independent looks to be a two-person shop, damn!

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

Meanwhile Greenwald is in a tizzy over what Obama may or may not have said about "judicial activism."

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

Meanwhile Greenwald is in a tizzy

Create a keyboard macro for that and just repost it every couple of weeks and you're fine.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

I was waiting for someone to post "what else is new?"

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

seriously i dont get how he keeps his blood pressure down

max, Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

i guess living in brazil is relaxing

max, Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

Bloggers need to blog.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

bloggersgonnablog.anigif

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

guys have a little faith in the campaigning machine, it's only April & not sure still has 13% of the vote

hopefully this 'not sure' candidate will do as well as the former president not sure who took over from president camacho

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2007/08/03/idiocracyM_070803013321451_wideweb__300x427.jpg

mayor jingleberries, Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

so for you guys the fact that greenwald is outraged a lot negates the validity of his complaints?

really?

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

yep thats exactly what was just posted

max, Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.harikari.com/images/2008/02/outrage-ami150.gif

controll-s (velko), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:39 (fifteen years ago)

Create a keyboard macro for that and just repost it every couple of weeks and you're fine.

― Ned Raggett, Thursday, April 29, 2010 4:25 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

I was waiting for someone to post "what else is new?"

― cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, April 29, 2010 4:26 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

seriously i dont get how he keeps his blood pressure down

― max, Thursday, April 29, 2010 4:29 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark

lol max nope nothing like it even remotely at all rite

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:39 (fifteen years ago)

seriously for a guy who's all "read the thread" you might actually read the thread and your own posts

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

yeah its weird i guess there is a bug in my browser cause i dont really see what youre getting at.

max, Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

Specter bailed, Crist is bailing

Yes, the Dems will move from de facto to de jure Republicans in your lifetime, right?

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

I don't see anyone actually talking about the validity of what he posted there.

Which, if you want to go there: I don't see why Obama's stance of "the means are important" is necessarily an EVIL one to take. It has nothing to do with the decisions in question; he said was that judges overstep in the name of ideology and made no actual value judgment on the issues they were concerned with, either liberal or conservative. I don't agree with him in practical terms, largely because I think the scenario he's gunning for is actually impossible and, assuming that I'm right, I'd rather stack the deck with activists that think like me, but in terms of describing the Platonic ideal under which the Supreme Court should work, I don't think he's wrong.

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:45 (fifteen years ago)

I think Obama's being quite crafty and nuanced in that interview.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

greenwald: this kinda blows!
max: lol this guy sure is mad a lot!

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

max: therefore, there is no validity to what he says!

max, Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

It's a pre-emptive defense of whomever he picks against claims that they're a 'judicial activist' by turning the tables on the Republicans and claiming the same of them, which after the Thomas nomination is plausibly true.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

max: therefore, there is no validity to what he says!

yeah dude that's implied by where you put your focus

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

focus had already been put somewhere else you silly goose

max, Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

so, by extension, you think there's no validity to what I said since you're spending more time and energy playing gotcha with Max than responding to what I wrote

gotcha

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:51 (fifteen years ago)

its more fun to make jokes and play gotcha than it is to write about glenn greenwald WHO IS ALWAYS MAD AND INVALID

max, Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

i keep hitting F5 but i still don't see where max disagreed with glenn greenwald about whatever the fuck it is obama said about some shit.

going to disable some extensions, i guess

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

Hi Dere you wrote a long paragraph, you're keenly aware of my attention span by now

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

think it might be a flash problem xp

max, Thursday, 29 April 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

These decisions form the bedrock of progressive legal thought regarding the Constitution and the Supreme Court, which is why it's rather bizarre to hear Barack Obama condemn unspecified aspects of it as "judicial activism errors." Shouldn't he be asked which specific parts of the judicial approach in these two decades he finds to be disturbing? It's possible that he had something relatively innocuous in mind, that he intended to make a different point than the one he made, or that it was just a sloppy though typical effort to show how fair-minded he is by attacking the Dreaded Left, but the way he expressed it was a virtually complete replica of decades-old right-wing attacks on the Supreme Court.

^^^ the marrow of Greenwald's "tizzy" (i.e., his doing anything other than nodding meekly and saying "yeah, that's the best we can expect, why complain?")

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:01 (fifteen years ago)

shorter version: all Obama said was "I think the means matters, regardless of the end". Greenwald extrapolated that into "well then he must hate Roe v Wade". Greenwald is being a reactionary tool.

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:01 (fifteen years ago)

whaaaaat

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:02 (fifteen years ago)

fwiw i think greenwald does misread obama there

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

hey, just because greenwald isn't a meek SHEEPLE doesn't mean you have to call him NAMES

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

look is is v. v. v. reasonable at this point to be profoundly on guard against Obama's willingness to "compromise" on bedrock things like Roe v. Wade. Oklahoma just ruled that a doctor can withhold information about a fetus's condition if he thinks the mother might choose to abort. There hasn't been a word from the White House about this decision, and there won't be, most likely. people who treasure progressive benchmarks like roe v. wade are 100% justified in suspecting that there is nothing that isn't on the table and open to debate, imo

and just for the record, I think this is more a matter of Obama's character than any purported political savvy/gamesmanship. but be that as it may, given his willingness to give ground, it seems extremely important to be aware of what's at stake & how many people devoted their political lives to the very gains that now seem open for the finding of nuance

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:07 (fifteen years ago)

It used to be that the notion of an activist judge was somebody who ignored the will of Congress, ignored democratic processes, and tried to impose judicial solutions on problems instead of letting the process work itself through politically. And in the '60s and '70s, the feeling was, is that liberals were guilty of that kind of approach.

What you're now seeing, I think, is a conservative jurisprudence that oftentimes makes the same error.

notions? feelings? whose notions and feelings are we talking about here? i.e. "we've been hearing these people bleat on endlessly about how awful and judicially activisty the 60's were -- and now they want to do the same thing, because we're in charge of the legislature at the moment"

what does greenwald think obama is saying?

These decisions [of the 60's courts] form the bedrock of progressive legal thought regarding the Constitution and the Supreme Court, which is why it's rather bizarre to hear Barack Obama condemn unspecified aspects of it as "judicial activism errors."

is that a fair reading? nope!

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

preferred it when we were playing gotcha games

max, Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

goole, when he says "the same error," that clearly implies a previous error. what was that previous error? the "feeling"? or the error of overstepping in the name of ideology?

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

lol I know u did max but you asked for this

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

Thr true horror of politics is not that people will disagree with you no matter what - it's that they assume you are disagreeing with them for the same reason they are disagreeing with you. i.e. bad faith

textbook blows on the head (dowd), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)

Meanwhile, I'm currently in Census training, and, assuming I wind up walking a beat even tho I accepted a fulltime job yesterday, there should be no shortage of interesting interactions.

As trainers have pointed out , the Census is a powerful test case for how people feel about the govt, and they'll tell ya so.

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)

The thing about Obama is that there are plenty of areas where he isn't liberal for people to complain about that they don't really need to invent gross misreadings of simple English to generate column inches.

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:13 (fifteen years ago)

HI DERE OTM - get one real priority.

textbook blows on the head (dowd), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:17 (fifteen years ago)

Like, no one is saying shit about the massive oil spill that's about to be set on fire and how Obama is still interested in drilling for oil.

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:17 (fifteen years ago)

UDPATE: Several people, in comments and via email, argue that Obama did not intend in these comments to endorse the view that there was judicial activism in the 1960s and 1970s, but merely that conservatives are being hypocritical in doing now what they accused liberal judges back then of doing (see here and here for two examples of that objection). That's definitely possible; I explicitly acknowledged that there was ambiguity in what Obama said and that "it's possible that he had something relatively innocuous in mind," which is why he should be asked what he meant. But I think my reading of his comments is, at the very least, reasonable, for reasons I explain here. Perhaps we can hear a clearer statement from him on whether he thinks, as he seemed (to me) to say here, that liberal Justices in these two decades were guilty of the "error" of judicial activism and, if so, in which instances.

"maybe i'm wrong about this, however, i'm not"

obama fetishises lincoln, by all accounts. speaking in the terms of your enemy, or at least, pointedly avoiding the language of your allies, is an old trope. people still argue about what lincoln really believed about slavery! whether obama's tic of speaking in a way that sounds like he's trying to sound wise to a reader a hundred years from now is really a good thing is a different and open question -- why greenwald doesn't try to get into that, i dunno, not his game.

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:18 (fifteen years ago)

lol no priority that isn't 100% pro-admin counts as a real priority around here - Guantanamo? get one real priority! abortion as settled law and part of health care? get one real priority! don't ask/don't tell? get one real priority! etc

xpost Hi Dere is exempt from my impotent rage because he doesn't stan for every fucking admin position and only say something against it when baited for 300+ posts

brad whitford's guitar explorations (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:19 (fifteen years ago)

thanking self for new username

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

um... as far as I can tell DADT is well on its way to going out the door; did you actually mean gay marriage there?

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:22 (fifteen years ago)

lol yes probably you know I get all wound up

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)

For the record, I'm in the "Greenwald needed to fill column inches" category. However, the only phrase that keeps Obama from making an equivalence between liberal and conservative jurisprudence is "the feeling was."

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:24 (fifteen years ago)

xpost Hi Dere is exempt from my impotent rage because he doesn't stan for every fucking admin position and only say something against it when baited for 300+ posts

Who is this non-HI DERE monster who you are challenging?

textbook blows on the head (dowd), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:25 (fifteen years ago)

max as always, do keep up

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:27 (fifteen years ago)

Just wondering. If being angry about a lot of stuff invalidates one's positions, then what about the racist tradition of dismissing all those "angry blacks" as "just angry at the world"? Were they right all along?

Aimless, Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:34 (fifteen years ago)

Like, no one is saying shit about the massive oil spill that's about to be set on fire and how Obama is still interested in drilling for oil.

^^^

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:34 (fifteen years ago)

(x-posts) I guessed, but thought you were being kind of insulting to Max, and reductionist to his position.

textbook blows on the head (dowd), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:35 (fifteen years ago)

Aimless, I think the point is that reacting in anger can cloud one's judgment.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

welcome to political thread interaction between max and Aerosmith

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

ooooo my ears are burning

max, Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:38 (fifteen years ago)

Aimless, as a guy who defends angry guys, I don't think Glenn Greenwald has nearly as much to complain about as a people who were enslaved & disenfranchised by law for centuries, and further would argue that the comparison of any trend/tendency/phenomenon to the horrors of slavery & Jim Crow laws & the general fucked-upedness of American race relations is a 100% nonstarter

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

thread needs more dennis perrin

controll-s (velko), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

btw Aerosmith will win that fight

there are five of us

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

and we're all old as fuck

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

Thread needs a Justice Roberts.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

aimless i don't think anyone here has concluded that being angry invalidates one's position. and i don't think it's greenwald's anger that caused him to be wrong about this particular statement from the president, i just think he's, like, wrong. and no i don't think racist dismissals of black anger are kosher, nor apposite really. so there you have it. no.

xps

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

what the fuck are you people on about? And you're complaining about Greenwald being angry for no reason?!

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

what do you mean, "you people"

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

Everyone not in Aerosmith.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)

It seems pretty clear to me that Obama has at least wrestled with the notion that 'judicial activism', i.e., finding rights in the Constitution that are not clearly expressed has been a mixed bag. During the civil rights era in the 50's and 60's, you could look at Brown v Board of Ed and understand that negating Plessey was objectively defensible and the onus was on violent and maliciously racist southerners (mostly) who wished to be segregated from and wished to poltically and socially dominate African Americans. The right-wing backlash that brought Nixon to power may have felt that minorities were getting too powerful but their rage became more and more incandescent with the rulings of the SCOUTUS, from Loving to busing to abortion. I treasure all those rulings but had we arrived at those results by the normal means of democratic debate and legislation, we would be better off today. Of course, whether all the States would have gotten there or not and whther any of them would have by now is entirely debatable, and I am mindful of King's warning that asking the oppressed to wait it out a little is both morally bankrupt and terribly patronizing. I think Obama wants to act judiciously (pun intended) so as to maximize the good he can get out of this opportunity yet minimize the venom it engnders amongst his political enemies so using their own language and logic against them makes sense to me even if it doesn't particularly appeal to my sensibilities personally.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:50 (fifteen years ago)

Gah!

Simple point: if someone is wrong about something, the source of it is irrelevant and the wrongness may be addressed in itself, upon its own terms. Bringing up someone else's anger as an argument against their conclusions may be good rhetoric but falls on the side of sophistry, not reason. It is a distraction, a red herring, but it works.

Aimless, Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:51 (fifteen years ago)

Lol, Alfred!

xpost

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:52 (fifteen years ago)

Without being a constitutional scholar, I'm only really offended by the Griswold ruling, with whose results I agree but whose opinion is a legal disaster.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

Aimless, what if (and I admit it's being an if):

1. Greenwald is suspicious of Obama's motives/m.o.;
2. His prejudice causes him to read Obama's remarks in the worst possible light;
3. His reading of the remarks makes him angry;
4. His anger deprives him of circumspection;
5. Said lack of circumspection causes him to persist in a 'msireading'?

or

1. Needs to fill column space;
2. Knows righteous anger is popular w/target audience;
3. Knowingly fans flames to create more heat than light?

Other than that, I think that, "Perhaps we can hear a clearer statement from him on whether he thinks, as he seemed (to me) to say here, that liberal Justices in these two decades were guilty of the "error" of judicial activism and, if so, in which instances," is a perfectly legitimate request though I doubt the Pres is ever gonna stick his neck that far out before a confirmation fight.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

or what if

1. he mad
2. lol

max, Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

Like, no one is saying shit about the massive oil spill that's about to be set on fire and how Obama is still interested in drilling for oil.

I'm really hoping this summer everyone goes to Palm Beach and can't swim because the water is contaminated and dead fish keep washing up. Then all the oil that is salvaged has to go to the highest bidder (i.e. overseas).

I read that 11 people died in the accident as well. I guess as long as someone can fill up their SUV for a few cents cheaper it will have been worth it.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

basically i just wish obama would never use the words "judicial activism" ever, just fucking pick kagan or garland, and get it over with

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

Like, no one is saying shit about the massive oil spill that's about to be set on fire and how Obama is still interested in drilling for oil.

I'd like to see how this pans w/Obama but the first thing I thought this morning when I heard about the oil spill getting closer and closer to Louisiana and the fact that it's still pumping out loads of cruse was that "Drill, baby, drill," sounded about as responsible as when Levi put his unsheathed cock into Bristol.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)

Ex-cruse me, I meant 'crude'.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah what about an abstinence-only energy policy?

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

no you were right the first time, you meant "cock"

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:13 (fifteen years ago)

Ah, just found this out:

Gulf oil spill 'five times' larger than estimated

US coastguard says 5,000 barrels a day of oil are spewing from a well beneath site of the Deepwater Horizon rig explosion

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/apr/29/gulf-oil-spill-larger-estimated

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:16 (fifteen years ago)

xp to MW

I don't think Greenwald is right on this, or even mildly persuasive. But to answer your first instance: his misreading of Obama's words and his mischaracterization of his motives are where his argument is weak.

Attributing the source of his error to a predisposition to be mistrustful of Obama is just guesswork, unless you cite previous instances where he jumped the same direction and events proved him wrong. In fact, attribution of motive, without providing substance, is exactly the same error Greenwald is making.

In the second case, nothing you cite requires him to be wrong, in the sense that he might arrive at the right place by pure accident. His need to fill column inches is irrelevant to the content of those inches. If he knowingly misstates stuff, that is damning, but you still have to establish the fact of misstatement(s).

Again, I know this is not how political arguments really work, but damn I wish more people would even TRY to address questions of policy in terms of facts and outcomes, instead of hot buttons. The fact that Greenwald is making an ass of himself should make it easy to discredit his ideas without having to impugn his motives.

Aimless, Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, I agree, Aimless, and I did kinda try to address the implications of what Obama said in the tl;dr post prior to the one to which you;re responding. I think max bascially pwned me, tho.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

My favorite part of the response to the spill is that they've been using cannons to scare away wildlife on the coasts. I mean, I understand why they're doing it, but if you take a step back and look at it from an alien's perspective, it's absurd. The kind of people who call Al Gore 'Al Bore' always get all pissed off when one dares to mention that our dependency on fossil fuels is catastrophically, and in some cases irreversibly, impacting our environment, but the fact remains that we're about to set hundreds of thousands of gallons of floating crude oil aflame, deploy an experimental giant 'dome' to attempt to contain the spread, and shoot off cannons at wildlife in response to a disaster that took the lives of 11 workers.

biologically wrong (Z S), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:29 (fifteen years ago)

I hadn't heard about the cannons.

I hate that that is making me lol.

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:30 (fifteen years ago)

U S A

U S A

max, Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:30 (fifteen years ago)

however on the bright side, I'm lolling

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:30 (fifteen years ago)

see, indefinite detention and a military response is the solution to just about everything

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

much needed stimulus for the struggling cannonball industry imo

controll-s (velko), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

he fact remains that we're about to set hundreds of thousands of gallons of floating crude oil aflame, deploy an experimental giant 'dome' to attempt to contain the spread, and shoot off cannons at wildlife in response to a disaster that took the lives of 11 workers.

when you put it this way it's hard not to feel glad to be alive

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)

Any articles I read on this stuff talk about how the damage to animals in the area will be minimized and yeah that's great but us humans have to breathe in that air and no one is really talking about that.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

It's smoke from an oil spill the size of Rhode Island. Mmmm.....breathe that in!!

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

I wonder if you can watch the giant dome on Google Earth.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

I'm kind of wondering when animals stopped breathing.

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

Ahhh! That aroma takes me straight back to Kuwait just after the Gulf War ended.

Aimless, Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:41 (fifteen years ago)

xp to myself: likely shortly after getting a fuckton of oil dumped on them

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

Meanwhile, BP (who operates the leaking oil rig) just announced that their profits doubled in the first quarter, to over 6 billion.

biologically wrong (Z S), Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

Good thing they'll be spending that on cleaning the spill up.

yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

basically i just wish obama would never use the words "judicial activism" ever, just fucking pick kagan or garland, and get it over with

― ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, April 29, 2010

I naively hope Obama will surprise me and not pick either of those two not far enough left for me candidates. Do you think Obama using the phrase "judicial activism" just plays into the right's tedious arguments? I'm not so sure.

curmudgeon, Thursday, 29 April 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

today's distraction:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/28/AR2010042805335.html

Virginia driver denies license plate had coded racist message

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

(let's see if posting the pic works)

http://media3.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2010/04/22/PH2010042201511.jpg

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

last line is a killer

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

Story received a certified letter last week from the DMV ordering him to get new plates. And his boss told him that he could no longer park on VDOT property with the anti-Islam mural. So Story spent an afternoon getting new randomized plates and peeling the mural off by hand.

"I feel naked," he said.

Pobrecito.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

His facebook site apparently says lots of things about being 100% White and 100% Aryan and he compares himself to David Duke, so I don't think anything you might be thinking about him would be likely to be wrong.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

wow mural only cost $225

hobbes, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:08 (fifteen years ago)

This paranoia is worthy of Nabokov:

CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper said his group looked into the meaning of the numbers 14 and 88 after receiving complaints about Story's license plates. He said the group found that among neo-Nazis, 88 refers to "Heil Hitler," because H is the eighth letter of the alphabet. White supremacists sometimes use the number 14, Hooper said, as shorthand for the 14-word motto, "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children."

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

fuck this guy but i think it's kinda fucked up that he has to change his plates

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

guys are you kidding? the "14 88" shit is everywhere in white supremacy circles

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

Vanity plates are always subject to approval to ensure they aren't used to convey offensive messages.

Aimless, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

so far behind licence plate logg

harbl, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

fuck this guy but i think it's kinda fucked up that he has to change his plates

Yeah, I'm pretty liberal about this sort of thing too.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

I'm not.

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

xps Laurel, got a link?

i suppose it is possible that a guy with an anti-islam mural and a confederate battle flag on his truck also has a well-known racist code on his license place coincidentally...

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

for a contrary view:

http://frontpagemag.com/2010/04/29/hamas-linked-cair-smears-anti-jihad-virginia-driver-as-neo-nazi-2/

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

I kind of feel like, if you want to put shit like this on your car, you should have to agree to have "I AM AN IGNORANT DIPSHIT" tattooed across your face.

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

enjoy:

http://www.google.com/search?q=%2214+88%22

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.facebook.com/doug.story225?ref=search&sid=1609737.941988229..1

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

i get why he has to change his plates but i don't think a public agency should be able to force him to take the mural off the truck

harbl, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

More details via gawker.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

Guns, Computer, The Internet

harbl, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

they'll pry my FWAHAT license from my cold dead hands

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

Bio

100% WHITE MAN, 100% ARYAN, 100% PRO-LIFE (Children are innocent), 100% PRO DEATH PENALTY (Criminal Scum aren't innocent).
Over the past 28 years; I, like David Duke, have had an Awakening.

...

Contact Info
Website: ttp: //newsaxon.0rg /Confederad0
Facebook Profile: ttp://www.facebook.com /d0ug.story225

yup, just a nascar fan.

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:20 (fifteen years ago)

uh shit mods you should probably de-link

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)


I kind of feel like, if you want to put shit like this on your car, you should have to agree to have "I AM AN IGNORANT DIPSHIT" tattooed across your face.

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/graphics/art3/0130063tattoo1.jpg

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)

i get why he has to change his plates but i don't think a public agency should be able to force him to take the mural off the truck

― harbl, Thursday, April 29, 2010 3:18 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark

the public agency is his employer!

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)

i understand that

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

Music
As Previously Stated, Country and Bluegrass, Anything With a Banjo, Anything With Bagpipes, White Power Metal, Black metal, Death metal, Rock and Pop From the '70's and '80's, The Proclaimers

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

"don't bring that mural onto state property anymore"

"what am i gonna drive to work in???"

"..."

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, delink but

Here's to fire. Not the fast and furious kind
that burns down shacks and shanties.
But the slow, seductive kind that
takes down pants and panties.

yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

I agree with removing his plates, but ordering him to remove the mural is too much.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

The Proclaimers

waht

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

VDOT didn't force him to remove the mural, his boss just took away his privilege to park in the VDOT parking lot while it was in place. He could park elsewhere and walk the rest of the way. Such oppression!!

Aimless, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

OTOH what would happen if the mural upset a 9/11 victim family/survivor driving behind?

yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

White Power Metal

someone try to convince me that this doesn't mean what I think it means

Anything With Bagpipes (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

xxpost -- He would, in fact, walk five hundred miles.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

someone try to convince me that this doesn't mean what I think it means

lolllll

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

Eh, whatever. I'm not get into a constitutional argument about the right to political speech encompassing even heinous shit. I don't even know if bumper stickers count as "speech."

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

i get why he has to change his plates but i don't think a public agency should be able to force him to take the mural off the truck

― harbl, Thursday, April 29, 2010 4:18 PM (2 minutes ago)

yeah idk anytime the govt gets to decide which speech is ok and which isn't i'm kinda ehhh, even if this guy can eat a dick afaic. and i havent been to lawyer school but i didnt know you could be made to have your plates changed if they were deemed offensive

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

xp i think they do

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

goole, you have kept ilx off the streets and out of trouble for another 1000 posts.

Aimless, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)

i don't wanna play constitutional argument either it just seems wrong to me, as to the plate thing i can see how that could be like government speech or something they don't wanna be endorsing

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

and/or

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

I'd be pretty upset if I walked into the university parking garage and saw a truck with a mural featuring Matthew Shepherd strung up on the fence and "God hates fags," but I'm practically an absolutist about the First Amendment.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:31 (fifteen years ago)

Well, you can't have AC/DC on plates either because of bisexuality connotations.

yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

for those about to rock (think of a different license plate)

Anything With Bagpipes (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

I'd be more afraid someone would think I liked their eighties work.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

just read the greenwald piece and yeah he...sorta made a leap from what obama said and what greenwald heard, but i think his point of "what decisions were the 'activist' ones?" is a fair one. not really enough for a column, and i think he's just venting because he knows he's going to make a bad decision with the pick and wants to be able to play connect-the-dots afterward

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

gov'ts as public employers usually have very broad (or stringent, depending on your view) workplace diversity policies. yeah it's constitutional i guess, the claim is basically the employer gets to determine what kinds of messages they'd like in their space while conducting business. a public insult to a given religion is a little over whatever line you'd like to draw i think.

yeah it's a gray area like anything; if i had one of those darwin fish on my car i'd be VERY surprised if management at my company asked me not to drive to work in it, but if i had a big mural of ratzinger sodomizing a child with the legend FUCK CHRIST AND HIS RAPING LIES, i wouldn't be surprised at all, even tho it's roughly the same "message"

xp but yeah alfred otm in one sense, it does let you know who you're really dealing with. most businesses and state agencies would rather you pretend you don't know

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)

yeah it's a gray area like anything; if i had one of those darwin fish on my car i'd be VERY surprised if management at my company asked me not to drive to work in it, but if i had a big mural of ratzinger sodomizing a child with the legend FUCK CHRIST AND HIS RAPING LIES, i wouldn't be surprised at all, even tho it's roughly the same "message"

I am not really convinced those are "roughly the same 'message'"

Anything With Bagpipes (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

For like forever most states are pretty strict about what can't go on a license plate, they reserve the right because the plates are always their property IIRC, like your driver's license they can demand a handback for damn near any reason.

yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)

a big mural of ratzinger sodomizing a child with the legend FUCK CHRIST AND HIS RAPING LIES

man you know the Met would have hosted this exhibit in 1988.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.uniurb.it/Filosofia/bibliografie/Bataille_GiuliaFrattini/images/Serrano%20Andres,%20Piss%20Christ%201987.jpg

Anything With Bagpipes (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2184/2247036388_a937f6fffd.jpg

yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

dan beat me to it.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

At one point I seriously considered getting a plate that said CONMYTS. It wouldn't have been the stupidest thing I've ever done.

Walter Melon (Abbott), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

Would have been up there though.

Walter Melon (Abbott), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

I would like to summarize goole's excellent post for brevity's sake

yeah it's a gray area...sodomizing a child...FUCK CHRIST

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

For like forever most states are pretty strict about what can't go on a license plate, they reserve the right because the plates are always their property IIRC, like your driver's license they can demand a handback for damn near any reason.

no ones really talking about the plates tho.

I'm kinda with Alfred on this, ideogically.

rapping about space and shit, floatin’ around in an orgy of screen savers (gbx), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)

The best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market, and that truth is the only ground upon which their wishes safely can be carried out. That at any rate is the theory of our Constitution. It is an experiment, as all life is an experiment. Every year if not every day we have to wager our salvation upon some prophecy based upon imperfect knowledge. While that experiment is part of our system I think that we should be eternally vigilant against attempts to check the expression of opinions that we loathe and believe to be fraught with death, unless they so imminently threaten immediate interference with the lawful and pressing purposes of the law that an immediate check is required to save the country

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)

you know how you can't, like, go on TV and say "FUCK SHIT ASSHOLE CUNT FUCK EAT SHIT MOTHERFUCKER ASSHOLE FUCK CUNT FUCK FUCK FUCK CUNT FUCK MOTHERFUCKER"??? that's sorta like how you the govt can make sure that your license plate doesn't spell out "FUCK YOU"

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)

or also racist shit

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:53 (fifteen years ago)

as for the mural thing -- i think if we're all okay with like, businesses having dress codes, then we should be okay with businesses having some sort of 'code' for what can't be displayed on your car i.e. racist shit

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:55 (fifteen years ago)

Uh why?

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:55 (fifteen years ago)

because it's pretty much the same thing?

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)

It's not the same thing! Unless you're a stripper, wearing clothes forms part of how we conduct ourselves on the job. A car parked outside does not. An exception: I'll assume Domino's Pizza won't allow the Virginia guy to use his truck.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)

haha it's totally not the same thing

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)

according to his facebook he does plowing and road maint, maybe he drives the thing around on state business.

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:57 (fifteen years ago)

domino's is a private business anyway

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:58 (fifteen years ago)

what if I drove a perfectly decent Toyota and a colleague happened to catch a glimpse a copy of Mein Kampf on the passenger seat? Would a code of conduct prohibit this?

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

would you be okay with someone driving to work with nooses hanging from all four windows?

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

or parking at work, whatever it may be

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:00 (fifteen years ago)

While you are on the business's grounds as their employee, you are representing them, and as such they have some right to tell you what messages/signals they want associated with their company.

Note that dude was told he couldn't park in the parking lot and he chose to remove the mural; if it was that important to him, he could have accumulated tickets from parking illegally on the street, arranged a carpool situation with someone, or parked somewhere else and found alternate transportation to his job.

FWIW, I feel the same way about political bumperstickers, band bumper stickers, etc.

xp: Mein Kampf on your car seat is meaningless, as the book is not part of your car and, if someone finds it that offensive, you can put it in a bag.

Anything With Bagpipes (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:00 (fifteen years ago)

how is that my business?

xpost

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)

It's not the same thing! Unless you're a stripper, wearing clothes forms part of how we conduct ourselves on the job. A car parked outside does not. An exception: I'll assume Domino's Pizza won't allow the Virginia guy to use his truck.

enh a car parked in the employee lot with that mural might start to get close

if I saw that garbage and could reasonably conclude it was an employee vehicle, I would take my business elsewhere

rapping about space and shit, floatin’ around in an orgy of screen savers (gbx), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)

well if you employed said person, it would be prudent for it to be your business

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:01 (fifteen years ago)

if I saw that garbage and could reasonably conclude it was an employee vehicle, I would take my business elsewhere

Here's where we part company.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)

People have be able to expect a safe and nonthreatening work environment and employers have to be able to expect that your personal business isn't going to cause them any controversey.

huh! tikuuta. (kingkongvsgodzilla), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)

buh? xp

rapping about space and shit, floatin’ around in an orgy of screen savers (gbx), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)

I mean I just don't care. Like Holmes said, "Every idea is an incitement."

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)

yeah nobody's telling the guy he absolutely can't have a crazy mural on his truck, the state of virginia DOT is telling him they don't want an anti-islam message anywhere near the taxpayer-paid public work they do

xp yeah every idea is an incitement, this is why employers like their spaces of operation to be as idea free as possible!

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:04 (fifteen years ago)

srsly Alfred? you're about to buy a sandwich and see an employee car out front that says KILL FAGGOTS and you're like "well I'm hungry so w/e"

just go to subway imo, maybe drown Katy Perry I dunno

rapping about space and shit, floatin’ around in an orgy of screen savers (gbx), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)

this guy's message is repugnant to me but i'm being an emotional slippery slope fearer
btw what private companies can do is way different from public employers guys!!!!!

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

I suppose you could reasonably assume a guy with that mural might himself burn a Muslim to death; but we don't know. The assholedom that inspires those kinds of decorations usually feeds on people's bruised feelings. That said, anyone with a modicum of courtesy knows better than to parade a copy of Mein Kampf; if I were reading it on my break I'd make sure I wouldn't do it in the breakroom where anyone I know might get the wrong idea. But I might get defensive if someone wants to pick a fight about it.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

In a sense, I do support allowing people to wear their batshit crazy on their sleeves because, wherever possible, I would like to make choices that leave these people destitute and desperate for welfare and if they are allowed to display their plumage (so to speak), that makes that goal easier to achieve.

Anything With Bagpipes (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

srsly Alfred? you're about to buy a sandwich and see an employee car out front that says KILL FAGGOTS and you're like "well I'm hungry so w/e"

But if I walked in with my date and he makes a remark I'll bust his face open. That's where his free speech impinges on my conduct.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:08 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, but in that scenario you're the one going to jail, so...

Anything With Bagpipes (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)

public employers are often MORE stringent about messaging and diversity! they should be!

that reminds me i saw some kind of beck-esque sticker on a courier truck the other day, now i forget the sticker and the company, shit. it's not like a get anything couriered but you know.

xps

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, but in that scenario you're the one going to jail, so...

Sure. But I wouldn't file a lawsuit.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:10 (fifteen years ago)

haw, rule by force, then?

i don't have a problem with lawsuits. the rule of law means rule by lawyers, dunnit.

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

no ones saying you ought to? I'm not at least

rapping about space and shit, floatin’ around in an orgy of screen savers (gbx), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:12 (fifteen years ago)

public employers are often MORE stringent about messaging and diversity! they should be!

not what i'm talking about at all. this is a dumb argument though, i'm bored

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:14 (fifteen years ago)

what do people make of this bill

will it have the desired impact...? Citizens United ruling seems so fucked up, not sure if legislation can really undermine it all.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)

also yeah do not care about racists being racisty

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:17 (fifteen years ago)

altho surprised folks were unaware of the 14 and 88 connotations, that stuff is not a secret or anything

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:18 (fifteen years ago)

dale earnhart and tony stewart? yeah i knew about that

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:19 (fifteen years ago)

The disclosure rider seems perfect to me; allow whomever to say whatever, but they have to come on camera and say "oh btw, this is coming from me".

The bit about offering reduced rates to "political parties" makes me wonder how they're defining "political party" (ie, are there more than 2?) as that could actually be a foothold to make non-Democratic/Republican candidates viable in more elections.

Anything With Bagpipes (HI DERE), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:21 (fifteen years ago)

OK this is gross.

By the way, did anyone read Savage's book on Cheney? Outstanding.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

i do care about racists being racisty if people itt are gonna be all "this is okay to ban, because we can all agree that we don't like it"

harbl and alfred otm

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

also re: private vs public

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

i do care about racists being racisty if people itt are gonna be all "this is okay to ban, because we can all agree that we don't like it"

this is obv not what anyone was saying, but sure

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

"this" was not "banned"

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:55 (fifteen years ago)

It was removed from a workplace, which serves the interests of creating a non-hostile work environment and not disruptively representing the company.

huh! tikuuta. (kingkongvsgodzilla), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:56 (fifteen years ago)

Or the commonwealth, as it were.

huh! tikuuta. (kingkongvsgodzilla), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:57 (fifteen years ago)

Sounds like there's very little speech you guys would deem protected in the public sphere then.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:58 (fifteen years ago)

Jesus fuckin Christ in re: more continuation of Bush-era policies in subpoenaing journalist & demanding he reveal his sources

disgusting imo

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:00 (fifteen years ago)

IIrc, someone was fired in 2004 for having a Kerry sticker on her car. I believe that an employer's freedom to discriminate based on political differences, however despicable, is not forbidden under Federal law.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:02 (fifteen years ago)

I didn't say anything was banned, i was objecting to the implication that certain things 'should' or are okay to be banned if they are offensive, at least by the govt

xp what al said

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:03 (fifteen years ago)

kev, when are you gonna go out and protest the fcc?

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

J0rdan, there's ample SCOTUS precedent attesting to the fed's power to regulate the airwaves. There's different constitutional principles at work here.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:07 (fifteen years ago)

kevin's talking normatively

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:07 (fifteen years ago)

Jesus fuckin Christ in re: more continuation of Bush-era policies in subpoenaing journalist & demanding he reveal his sources

disgusting imo

Well, considering we're in the middle of some serious times wrt Iran and nuclear inspections, I'm inclined to think there's something there. Holder must have mentioned this to the pres or the other way around but some people at CIA must be quite concerned for DOJ/Holder to make this decision.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:08 (fifteen years ago)

Whose word are you trusting here?

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:09 (fifteen years ago)

Have you read Risen's work? If anything, he showed how ineptly the National Security Agency has handled Iran for years.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:10 (fifteen years ago)

truck guy can express whatever he likes, and presumably he will continue to believe whatever he does. does the state of VA have to allow any and all kinds of expression from its employees while carrying out their duties? i don't have a problem saying "no," and i don't see how it infringes on the 1st amendment to do so.

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:12 (fifteen years ago)

Alfred, I haven't read Risen (should I?) and I am very, very troubled by this kind of govt action and I don't think Holder is my ACLU knight in white armor, but it strikes me as very odd that Holder would sign off on reviving subpoenae from the previous administration when he could just let it lie low.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:13 (fifteen years ago)

so you'd have no problem with Virginia firing a state employee for sporting a mural that said "Dubya is a WAR CRIMINAL" and showed him behind bars.

it strikes me as very odd that Holder would sign off on reviving subpoenae from the previous administration when he could just let it lie low.

Because now they're the party in power? I hate to be reductive, but...

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

I am giggling at the idea of a country where people's license plates regularly read, "Fuckayou" and "bite me" and "Hitler4life."

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:16 (fifteen years ago)

so you'd have no problem with Virginia firing a state employee for sporting a mural that said "Dubya is a WAR CRIMINAL" and showed him behind bars.

ha i'd probably like it less, but no, not really. you have however, moved to "firing" from "asked to not bring that particular mural or vehicle so decorated to your place of employment"

"please, no explicit political messages during work hours" isn't THAT unreasonable, is it?

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:17 (fifteen years ago)

Because now they're the party in power? I hate to be reductive, but...

What's better politically for them? They're not going to win over any wingnuts, anyway, and they'll piss off people in their base, so why do it?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:17 (fifteen years ago)

Governments -- bureaucracies -- have a pathological obsession with secrecy. You should read this.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:19 (fifteen years ago)

my pet theory is obama is terrified of any downturn in the fortunes of either war, or of a significant terrorist action on his watch. bush got a bump from terror but it will destroy obama if it happens. that's crazy nationalism for you. so he runs the war(s) with all the thumsbcrews available rather than let it go (as promised) and hope for the best. cheney gets his way one way or another, in effect.

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:22 (fifteen years ago)

One should never tell anyone anything or give information or pass on stories or make people remember beings who have never existed or trodden the earth or traversed the world, or who, having done so, are now almost safe in uncertain, one-eyed oblivion. Telling is almost always done as a gift, even when the story contains and injects some poison, it is also a bond, a granting of trust, and rare is the trust or confidence that is not sooner or later betrayed, rare is the close bond that does not grow twisted or knotted and, in the end, become so tangled that a razor or knife is needed to cut it.
--Javier Marías

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:23 (fifteen years ago)

Thanks, Alfred, I'll check that out.

Sure and I can easily imagine there are people in the CIA Iran bureau who just want to know which person/s to stick their knife into, but, and feel free to claim I'm giving Obama/Holder too much of the benefit of the doubt, I can't help think this is very tied to the present Iranian situation and the defectors we've got, etc..., to go out of their way to issue these.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:24 (fifteen years ago)

goole's theory makes sense, though for it to be more plausible, I think we'd see more direction in the conduct of our troops in Iraq.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:25 (fifteen years ago)

^^^my thinking is the same as Michael's here, I gotta say

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)

I mean Johnson bascially killed the Great Society from being unwilling to be the first American pres to lose a war...

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:26 (fifteen years ago)

goole, alfred didn't change the argument at all. of course any reasonable employer wouldn't want to be associated with that. But what if nascar fan says no?

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:27 (fifteen years ago)

ha i'm not even going to allow the "nascar fan" bit, but, ok, then you fire him.

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:29 (fifteen years ago)

Man, evil jobs hating on people's freedom of speech. Next thing you know they're going to tell you that you can't leave whenever you want during the day to go bowling.

If this wasn't a state job, if this was a private company instead, no one would be giving a crap except people that really believed in what the mural is saying.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:30 (fifteen years ago)

What I want to know is why didn't someone just anonymously key/egg his car?

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:31 (fifteen years ago)

If Obama knows politics at all, he needs to make it to either '10 or '12 w/either no attacks or some plausible excuse as to why they weren't found and with no significant fuck-ups in Iraq or Afghanistan. I have no idea how the underwear bomber plays out with most voters right now and I have zero sense how the political crisis in Iraq resonates here, but if no nat'l sec issues gain traction (and frankly even if they do), he will follow Clinton's advice and stick to the economy.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:32 (fifteen years ago)

But then he'd find some wog, faggot, or nigger to set on fire.

xpost

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:33 (fifteen years ago)

That's a little extreme, Alfred. The guy might be a grade A jackass but I've worked with guys like that who were all dumb talk and no action - it doesn't mean he'd beat random people based on his racism or religious intolerance. What we can certainly and fairly infer from what we know is the guy has a shallow understanding of religion and racism and atrocious taste, neither of which are yet criminal.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:39 (fifteen years ago)

I was making a joke -- that was exactly my position upthread.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:39 (fifteen years ago)

I have no idea how the underwear bomber plays out with most voters right now

forgotten, just like Mousaoui or the shoe bomber or any number of other unsuccessful stand-up comedy punchline losers

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:40 (fifteen years ago)

Most supporters of some restrictions on free speech insist that some speech is "incitement."

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:40 (fifteen years ago)

Did his employer say remove this or we'll throw you in jail? Or remove this or we'll fire you?

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:42 (fifteen years ago)


Man, evil jobs hating on people's freedom of speech. Next thing you know they're going to tell you that you can't leave whenever you want during the day to go bowling.

So if you've got a Human Rights Campaign sticker on your bumper and your boss tells you that's pussy shit & he doesn't want it in his parking lot, you're cool with that?

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:43 (fifteen years ago)

no john, just the stuff we don't like isn't okay. see how easy that is?

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:44 (fifteen years ago)

I was under the impression if you owned a business and the property it's on you can pretty much run shit how you want it. It's seemed that way with every job I've ever worked.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:45 (fifteen years ago)

My attitude on free speech (which I have seen drastically watered down in France, btw) is that its value stems not just from the dignity it accords individuals and their consciences but also that restricting it doesn't work and that allowing the craziest, evilest, most loony, malicious dicks out there to say whatever they want allows us all to know where they are and what they're thinking.

I also think that it places into govt hands the responsibility which should be ours collectively. I don't need the govt involved when I kick someone out of my house for saying something intolerant and vicious. I don't want them to feel like a victim. I want them to know this my decision and stems from my conscience not 'political correctness' or some fad or trend.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:45 (fifteen years ago)

you're cool with that?

aerosmith, I'm not cool with it. I'm even less cool w/removing the employer's right to run his co as s/he sees fit. Classic case of tolerance. Tolerance not approval.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:47 (fifteen years ago)

which I have seen drastically watered down in France

ugh yeah France's commitment to free speech is fucking pathetic these days

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:47 (fifteen years ago)

freedom of speech, pretty important
small bhusiness owners, the backbone of society

ladies and gents, michael white

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:48 (fifteen years ago)

I was in Waffle House today and there was a sign saying they have a right to remove anyone that engage the staff or customers in hate speech based on race/religion/sex/etc. How Waffle House successfully circumvented the constitution I do not know.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:48 (fifteen years ago)

Also, I will never, ever put a bumper sticker on my car. It's the most pissant form of communication ever.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:49 (fifteen years ago)

Michael White OTM. I get the impression that some of you just don't like dealing with people whose batshit opinions bother you -- even when they're irrelevant to the context in which you meet these people.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:49 (fifteen years ago)

Papa John's delivery guy arrives in a truck with a Dixie flag and BURN OBAMA BURN bumper sticker and I'm not going to say, "No, thanks, keep the pizza."

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:50 (fifteen years ago)

How Waffle House successfully circumvented the constitution I do not know.

Executive order and not act of congress...

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:50 (fifteen years ago)

no john, just the stuff we don't like isn't okay. see how easy that is?

― ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:44 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

mods should give out an award every day (like, minus 5 sbs or something) for the poster who most often willfully misreads the other side in an argument itt

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:51 (fifteen years ago)

Now if I see this guy in a zoning meeting screaming about socialism I'm going to shout him down.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:51 (fifteen years ago)

Michael White OTM. I get the impression that some of you just don't like dealing with people whose batshit opinions bother you -- even when they're irrelevant to the context in which you meet these people.

Michael White is the guy saying it's OK to restrict the guy's freedom of speech if you're the business owner!

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:52 (fifteen years ago)

mods should give out an award every day (like, minus 5 sbs or something) for the poster who most often willfully misreads the other side in an argument itt

sorry, J0rdan, but that's how you came off!

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:53 (fifteen years ago)

no john, just the stuff we don't like isn't okay. see how easy that is?

― ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:44 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

point me to the post where i posted the equivalent of this

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:53 (fifteen years ago)

J0rdan he wasn't talking to you dude

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:54 (fifteen years ago)

I treasure my freedom of speech no less than the other asshole treasures his. I'm probably the anti-Christ to him, too so I defend his right to defend mine. If you're only arguing for results (like the Right so often does wrt jurisprudence) and ignoring process, your society will get more and more polarized, you risk being a sanctimonious ass and wrong about it, and you truly do end up with hivemind where no one says the Emperor has no clothes.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:54 (fifteen years ago)

i didn't misread shit, jordan. saying someone can't have a hateful, anti-islamic bumper sticker is the exact same thing as saying someone can't have an ACLU sticker or whatever. left-wing censorship isn't any more justified than right-wing censorship

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:55 (fifteen years ago)

yeah except here's the thing: i never said that left wing tailgate murals are okay but right wing tailgate murals aren't okay

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)

so sorry, you didn't misread anything, you made stuff up -- my bad

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)

Michael White is the guy saying it's OK to restrict the guy's freedom of speech if you're the business owner!

Dude, I said I'm not really down with that but really? No, employer isn't restricting his freedom of speech, he's saying choose between this job and you're expression of speech during the work hours where I pay you. Can you really not see the difference?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)

that slope slides directly into "you can't work for me if you voted Democrat" & I ain't down with it, sorry - the car doesn't interfere with his work performance - if he's driving the car to appointments where it's alienating the clientele, maybe, otherwise, absolutely not

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:58 (fifteen years ago)

Doesn't employer have the right to have a workforce he can really believe in? For God's sake, won't somebody think of the bosses?

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:59 (fifteen years ago)

if he's driving the car to appointments where it's alienating the clientele, maybe,

right, but isn't the flip of this (clientele are driving to where he is for appointments, and are being alienated) the whole reasoning behind making him take it off?

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:59 (fifteen years ago)

he car doesn't interfere with his work performance - if he's driving the car to appointments where it's alienating the clientele, maybe, otherwise, absolutely not

Exactly my point upthread.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:00 (fifteen years ago)

9/11 isn't a "right wing thing" tho. I'm sure just as many left wingers died that day. Also this is the same state where the Pentagon was attacked as well.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:01 (fifteen years ago)

Exactly my point upthread.

― cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, April 29, 2010 6:00 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

i'm not sure how you can draw the line of "alienation" at "he must be physically in the car outside of work on work business" and not at "by having that on company property (in some sort of employee lot, surely) we are alienating potential patrons"

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:03 (fifteen years ago)

the car doesn't interfere with his work performance

I beg to differ. It might very well affect his work performance that total strangers he's never met are keeping this alive on the internets and the blogosphere and people at his work might know it.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:03 (fifteen years ago)

Michael White is the guy saying it's OK to restrict the guy's freedom of speech if you're the business owner!

Isn't this the way things have been done for decades in this country?

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:04 (fifteen years ago)

VDOT is not a business

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:06 (fifteen years ago)

So if you've got a Human Rights Campaign sticker on your bumper and your boss tells you that's pussy shit & he doesn't want it in his parking lot, you're cool with that?

― brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, April 29, 2010 6:43 PM (21 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

If it was commonly held that the Human Rights Campaign killed 3,000 Americans in a single act of terrorism, yeah I'd be cool with that.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:07 (fifteen years ago)

^haha jordan now can I say what I said before?

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:08 (fifteen years ago)

what?!?!? xpost

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:08 (fifteen years ago)

guns, computer, the internet

RIGHTS

rapping about space and shit, floatin’ around in an orgy of screen savers (gbx), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:18 (fifteen years ago)

If it was commonly held that the Human Rights Campaign killed 3,000 Americans in a single act of terrorism, yeah I'd be cool with that.

QED, all the boss has to say is "Jonah Goldberg has conclusively proven that liberals are Hitler" & I don't get to have my Farm Sanctuary sticker in his parking lot...or park a Prius there, for that matter, or follow a liberal vegetarian diet in his lunch room

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:19 (fifteen years ago)

I mean the position you're taking is basically that everything the labor movement ever believed about the rights of the worker were some bullshit, because hey, it's the boss's world & we serve at his pleasure

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:21 (fifteen years ago)

so is this gonna be bad enough for everyone to say 'fuck you' to more offshore oil drilling for the foreseeable future?

because I sure hope so.

Fucking oil industry...

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:21 (fifteen years ago)

u all have like, a hard time focusing on one specific problem. is it because of computer and the internet?

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:21 (fifteen years ago)

and I don't remember who it was that was asking "gee what are the risks" about offshore drilling but dude, HERE ARE THE RISKS

xp

(like I said I don't care about this goombah and his truck, pretty insignificant in the grand scheme of things)

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:22 (fifteen years ago)

the impact of humans on the environment is gonna be pretty insignificant in the truly grand scheme of things tbh

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:23 (fifteen years ago)

not so sure about that.

there's a whole lot more radioactive material then there used to be, and it's gonna be around for a loooong time. for example.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:28 (fifteen years ago)

sixty million years from now very little will remain to prove we were ever here imo

save the traces of my genius of course, those are eternal

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:29 (fifteen years ago)

lol

I know I'm just... major national ecological disaster vs. some white power loser with a truck, hmmm which is more important...

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:32 (fifteen years ago)

Ben Nelson apparently pressing Obama to drop his plan, introducing legislation to freeze further oil exploration etc.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:32 (fifteen years ago)

like I said I don't care about this goombah and his truck, pretty insignificant in the grand scheme of things)

― the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, April 29, 2010 7:22 PM (9 minutes ago)

ha i didn't mean that i just meant so many irrelevant tangents about the truck

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:33 (fifteen years ago)

well, or the right of an individual to free expression vs. an accident - this is a question of perspective

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:33 (fifteen years ago)

the impact of humans on the environment is gonna be pretty insignificant in the truly grand scheme of things tbh

― brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, April 29, 2010 7:23 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest

OTM. However, the impact of the environment on humans is quite significant, and almost always overlooked.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:33 (fifteen years ago)

hmmm which is more important...

― the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, April 29, 2010 6:32 PM (13 seconds ago) Bookmark

i would go with "this is being discussed on a message board"

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:34 (fifteen years ago)

what if everyone agreed that the environment sometimes kills ppl, then someone had a bumper sticker that said "i <3 the environment"

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:36 (fifteen years ago)

it's this really unfortunate thing that racism is, if you express it, a form of expression! employers of all kinds, especially public ones that have to play nice with the 14th amendment, don't like being anywhere within spitting distance of endorsing or even being, like, next to racism.

man i hope ilx can come up with some kind of solution here. but i never figured that fairly straightforward policies of non-hostile work environments would be so controversial.

goole, Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:46 (fifteen years ago)

Well now Louisiana is officially in a state of emergency.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:47 (fifteen years ago)

drill baby drill!

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:50 (fifteen years ago)

Something tells me that Sarah Palin will not see this as God trying to tell her something.

yes we kenya (suzy), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:58 (fifteen years ago)

arguing for environmental policy in the name of the frikkin environment itself is dumb---the reason i care about the environment and the state it's in is because i LIVE IN IT

rapping about space and shit, floatin’ around in an orgy of screen savers (gbx), Friday, 30 April 2010 00:01 (fifteen years ago)

ha tbf i don't think anyone here is worried about the earth's actual feelings, u otm tho

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Friday, 30 April 2010 00:04 (fifteen years ago)

the impact of humans on the environment is gonna be pretty insignificant in the truly grand scheme of things tbh

I feel where you're coming from. But since the impacts of our current trashing of the atmosphere are largely irreversible for 1000 years after emissions stop, that probably falls under most people's scheme of things.

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 30 April 2010 00:15 (fifteen years ago)

Did humans get nearly as many cancers before the industrial revolution? I know it's difficult to measure cos people lived far less but I think the answer even after you factor that in would be hell no.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 30 April 2010 00:21 (fifteen years ago)

Something tells me that Sarah Palin will not see this as God trying to tell her something.

How bout Drillmaster Bam?

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 30 April 2010 00:23 (fifteen years ago)

You don't understand, Obama NEEDED to give in on offshore drilling so that he could get the votes of...

oh wait...fuck it WAS completely stupid!

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 30 April 2010 00:26 (fifteen years ago)

Does this mean the spill is 5x the size of Rhode Island? I'm trying to find when that estimate happened and the new one and if they aren't one and the same..

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 30 April 2010 00:32 (fifteen years ago)

Oh ok it seems like the rate of the spill has been updated, not the area.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 30 April 2010 00:38 (fifteen years ago)

Misunderstandings about the constitutional protection of freedom of speech are so pervasive in the USA, judging from the internet conversations I have had over the last 15 years, that not much in the past 200 posts or so surprises me.

The problem with making ironic jokes about this, by feigning stupidity on the subject, is that stupidity is the norm, so your irony will go unappreciated.

First, the Virginia Dept. of Transportation is not a federal agency, and therefore any decisions of the VDOT fall under the jurisdiction of Constitution of the State of Viginia, not the US Constitution.

The US Constitution states that CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW restricting the freedom of speech or of the press, etc. The US Congress has nothing to do with this matter.

So long as Waffle House doesn't break the laws of the USA, or of the states, counties or cities where it does business, they can choose to limit what kind of speech they allow on their premises. They are not the US Congress, either, so the First Amendment doesn't restrict them. The same goes for the VDOT. Civil rights laws do apply, of course. And employment laws. And so on.

If, by preventing this jackass from parking his car, while muraled, in the VDOT parking lot has violated his civil rights, then I am sure an equally jackassy lawyer is eagerly seeking him out right now to offer to sue VDOT for $$$, on a contingency basis. But that is not a First Amendment matter.

Aimless, Friday, 30 April 2010 00:55 (fifteen years ago)

First, the Virginia Dept. of Transportation is not a federal agency, and therefore any decisions of the VDOT fall under the jurisdiction of Constitution of the State of Viginia, not the US Constitution.

The US Constitution states that CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW restricting the freedom of speech or of the press, etc. The US Congress has nothing to do with this matter.

this is 100% wrong!!!!!

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Friday, 30 April 2010 01:04 (fifteen years ago)

Thank you for that enlightening post.

Aimless, Friday, 30 April 2010 01:10 (fifteen years ago)

just letting u know

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Friday, 30 April 2010 01:12 (fifteen years ago)

maybe this will help http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incorporation_of_the_Bill_of_Rights

Guns, Computer, The Internet (harbl), Friday, 30 April 2010 01:12 (fifteen years ago)

Aimless judging by that link your impression of how far Constitutional protections extend is wrong

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 30 April 2010 02:07 (fifteen years ago)

Interesting Nate Silver/Tim Kaine Interview here regarding the DNC's midterm strategy. Especially glad to see that part of the plan is to emphasize

http://i40.tinypic.com/2hqqcxw.jpg

I realize that charts and graphs fly right over the heads of a lotta people, but this one is simple and clear enough that I think it's worthwhile.

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 30 April 2010 03:03 (fifteen years ago)

so much stimulus-funded construction going on on my street -- jackhammers wake me up at 7:15 am every morn but i guess it's p cool -- the fucked up entrance to our driveway got redone!

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Friday, 30 April 2010 03:05 (fifteen years ago)

Whoa, nice info design there! It helps that the Bush Admin's color makes it look like streams of blood.

Walter Melon (Abbott), Friday, 30 April 2010 03:09 (fifteen years ago)

But yet every one of my relatives' Facebook walls are littered with comments about "Obama's recession". I don't think any pretty pictures are going to be enough to change the minds of conservatives. They are 100% convinced that since they are struggling right NOW it must be Obama's fault.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 30 April 2010 03:12 (fifteen years ago)

Reagan's approval ratings were in the low thirties in November '82, if that sort of thing matters.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 April 2010 03:14 (fifteen years ago)

You know, I had assumed that the design was awesome and simple because of Obama's recruitment of Edward Tufte to work on Recovery Act-related charts and graphs, but I guess Tufte was just appointed to that position last month or so, long after they started putting out versions of that graph just above. I totally nerd out thinking about what Tufte will put together in the future.

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 30 April 2010 03:14 (fifteen years ago)

@ jon - sure - those people aren't going to be won over - but charts like that might motivate some of the first-time voters whose numbers really helped Obama, is (part of) the point - if a % of people who were motivated to go vote for Obama can be persuaded to show up to the midterms, it's good news for the Democrats

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 30 April 2010 03:16 (fifteen years ago)

But yet every one of my relatives' Facebook walls are littered with comments about "Obama's recession". I don't think any pretty pictures are going to be enough to change the minds of conservatives. They are 100% convinced that since they are struggling right NOW it must be Obama's fault.

Yeah, I hear ya. A few months ago I caught Rush Limbaugh's radio show, for the first time in maybe a decade, and I was amazed at how many times he said "THIS IS OBAMA'S RECESSION. THIS IS ENTIRELY HIS FAULT. DO NOT LISTEN TO ANYONE WHO SAYS HE INHERITED IT. THAT IS FALSE. THIS IS HIS RECESSION. THIS IS OBAMA'S RECEPTION. THIS IS HIS FAULT. THIS IS OBAMA'S RECEPTION.", just over and over and over again. totally disturbing, but in terms of messaging, I guess it's working on some people.

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 30 April 2010 03:17 (fifteen years ago)

Oh it is great news and I'm thrilled! I certainly don't mean to downplay it in the least. I've just been stuck in some arguments lately with hard-headed people who insist we are still in "Obama's recession" and no amount of statistics or proof can sway them.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 30 April 2010 03:18 (fifteen years ago)

also totally weird is how Obama's Recession morphed into Obama's Reception there. xpost to self

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 30 April 2010 03:18 (fifteen years ago)

in rush limbaugh's defense, this is obama's recession. this is entirely his fault. you shouldn't listen to anyone who says he inherited it. that is false. this is his recession.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 30 April 2010 03:23 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, on one hand, yeah, it is his recession, it's true. But on the other, we shouldn't listen to anyone who says otherwise, because that is false. This is Obama's recession.

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 30 April 2010 03:27 (fifteen years ago)

http://i39.tinypic.com/20usakg.jpg

braaaaiiinns

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 30 April 2010 03:27 (fifteen years ago)

maybe he meant that it WAS actually his reception, ie he received it from gwb

ban c u tty (k3vin k.), Friday, 30 April 2010 04:06 (fifteen years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8654138.stm

caek, Friday, 30 April 2010 12:09 (fifteen years ago)

:)

Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 12:12 (fifteen years ago)

Calamity In the Gulf Cont'd [Jonah Goldberg]
Obviously, if I thought the oil rig disaster was a calamity on Tuesday, I think it even more of one now. And if it really does take 3 months to stop the leak the environmental catastrophe could be a mortal wound to offshore oil drilling, particularly the deep water stuff. Three months of oil-covered birds leading the nightly newscasts. Three months of politicians hearing from their justifiably fearful constituents. Three months of environmentalists saying "we told you so."

If it doesn't take three months, if they get this thing fixed sooner rather than later, it'll still be awful and critics of offshore drilling will still have ample ammo. But it's worth noting that unless you're going to abandon oil altogether, the case for offshore drilling — and domestic drilling generally — still has a lot of merit, even on environmental terms. Oil tankers are still way more dangerous than oil rigs. Thousands of tankers traversing the oceans raises the risks of spills considerably more than rigs close to shore.

Still, as a longtime supporter of expanding our exploitation of domestic oil, this is just awful.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 April 2010 12:48 (fifteen years ago)

..............

Fetchboy, Friday, 30 April 2010 12:50 (fifteen years ago)

Still, as a longtime supporter of expanding our exploitation of domestic oil, this is just awful

should point JG to the sympathy card thread

lebrons elbow (brownie), Friday, 30 April 2010 13:07 (fifteen years ago)

ha, love that the main thrust of that is "this is awful because ppl are just gonna hate drilling" not "this is awful because it is manifestly awful"

rapping about space and shit, floatin’ around in an orgy of screen savers (gbx), Friday, 30 April 2010 13:15 (fifteen years ago)

Still, as someone who's going to have to pick up the slack around the office while you're at your mothers funeral, this is just awful

lebrons elbow (brownie), Friday, 30 April 2010 13:17 (fifteen years ago)

But it's worth noting that unless you're going to abandon oil altogether, the case for offshore drilling — and domestic drilling generally — still has a lot of merit, even on environmental terms. Oil tankers are still way more dangerous than oil rigs. Thousands of tankers traversing the oceans raises the risks of spills considerably more than rigs close to shore.

We're not going to "give up oil", unfortunately, for a few more decades, at least not intentionally. But in terms of supply, expanding offshore drilling still doesn't have any merit because the "potential reserves" are a drop in the bucket compared to current demand (according to everyone except big oil-funded "studies", that is), they won't be extracted for at least another decade, and they're expected to lower gas prices THREE CENTS by 2030.

The idea might have an infinitisimally slight resemblance to merit if there were there were no such thing as clean energy, energy efficiency, climate change, and ecological disasters and the ongoing sixth great extinction event.

I'm sure the right wing will be annoyed at the envirofascists, but it's not our fault that one of the three pillars of the GOP's "energy plan" (offshore drilling - RONG, 'clean coal' - RONG, nuclear - imo RONG but at least you can have an intelligent debate about it, unlike the first two) is disintegrating mere weeks after Obama compromised on it for no legitimate reason.

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 30 April 2010 13:31 (fifteen years ago)

I would like to point out to Shakey Mo Misrepresenter that the question that was asked was "what is the ecological impact of doing surveys" not "what is the ecological impact of drilling".

Basically, there are certain things I am not a fan of, but one thing I am a massive overriding fan of is someone who says "I want to gather as much information as I reasonably can before I make a decision", which is why I am massively supportive of what other people seem to feel is Obama waffling on stances that they believe have obvious correct decisions. Those issues may, in fact, have obvious correct decisions, but the importance of showing how you reached that decision shouldn't be handwaved. If Obama is defined by anything, it is by his love of making a process work.

Anything With Bagpipes (HI DERE), Friday, 30 April 2010 13:40 (fifteen years ago)

Imho many people read "I am going to open up these areas to surveys" as "I'm going to survey and then drill".

curmudgeon, Friday, 30 April 2010 14:24 (fifteen years ago)

I understand that, which is why I keep reiterating what he ACTUALLY SAID.

Maybe I'm a total crazy person for wanting to judge people on what they've actually said and done rather than what I assume they will do.

Anything With Bagpipes (HI DERE), Friday, 30 April 2010 14:30 (fifteen years ago)

well at least that's one thing he'll be defined as

think you're mad gullible but it's not worth getting into an argument over every time an issue comes up and obama's response is 'hmmmm i havent been a lawyer or politician my whole life or anything and i don't have advisers who have been working on this very issue since my campaign started...what do all sides of the issue have to say about this? <3 bipartisanship'

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Friday, 30 April 2010 14:31 (fifteen years ago)

The fact that they ruled out certain areas for even surveys, was read by some as further support for the argument that he was going forward with a "survey then drill" policy in the other areas (plus politicians from some states including Virginia where they are going to "survey," advocated drilling).

curmudgeon, Friday, 30 April 2010 14:54 (fifteen years ago)

Axelrod saying new offshore drilling/studiesare being abandoned in the wake of this disaster FYI

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 April 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

guys obama is just examining all possible angles before he makes an informed decision, just trust him

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Friday, 30 April 2010 15:58 (fifteen years ago)

that NYT headline is totally misleading/inaccurate imho

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 April 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

reserving judgment until I know where Obama stands on the viking at sleep/viking in dreams question

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 30 April 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

Obama isn't criticizing any 60s/70s Supreme Court decisions, he's just noting how those decisions were widely perceived - and then painting the court's recent decisions in the same light.

I'm not gonna bother reading Greenwald, sorry.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

http://photos.upi.com/Audio/Year_in_Review/abb0dc5c0f4a6ad9f6d6cdfa5a79da8c/Warren-Burger.jpg

God, was Rehnquist ever even decent looking?

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:02 (fifteen years ago)

Obama isn't criticizing any 60s/70s Supreme Court decisions, he's just noting how those decisions were widely perceived - and then painting the court's recent decisions in the same light.

This is how I'm looking at it. I'm usually fan of Charlie Savage's reporting, and am surprised he's playing a mere stenographer here.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:02 (fifteen years ago)

yeah just read the nyt article and there's nothing new from yesterday

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

from the NYT

The White House declined to identify rulings that Mr. Obama believes relied on judicial activism. It also argued that his recent remarks were consistent with his history of separating himself from liberals in the Warren court mold. In his book, “The Audacity of Hope,” for example, Mr. Obama suggested that “in our reliance on the courts to vindicate not only our rights but also our values, progressives had lost too much faith in democracy.”

the nub of the issue seems to be obama, on some level, thinks that policy change effected "from above" is less valid or less sure than when it comes "from below"

personally i don't care what avenue it takes. people advance politics by lawsuit as much as by legislation in this country, so the courts have a role whether you think it's the best avenue or not.

goole, Friday, 30 April 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

Indeed, Walter Dellinger, a Clinton administration lawyer, said in a recent interview that Mr. Obama was likely to seek a nominee who would foster a “culture of restraint” on the court.

“He may be more concerned about avoiding a court that would strike down progressive legislation than he is with achieving a court that will enforce its constitutional views on the other branches,” Mr. Dellinger said.

look, as everybody knows, I am not exactly mr. one-man cheering section for the president or his party. but this interpretation of what he's driving at seems on the money. he is a defensive player. crowds boo defensive players, but they're wrong to; if winning is what you're all about, then a good defense beats a good offense most days imo. as everybody knows I am an ignorant idealist who wants the president to go on nat'l tv and say "abortion's part of health care of course it's funded, also we're going to regulate the shit out of the banks so old people who saved for thirty years don't end up living on cat food, if you don't like it kill yourself" but strategically I think on reflection that these remarks are part of a broader choice to protect previous gains by giving ground on them instead of drawing a line in the sand. I am against that strategy because I think its natural end is "hey, wow: all those gains have been erased! how'd that happen?"

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

yeah agreed, i'm at the same place i was yesterday wrt to this, i guess i just expected an actual quote based on the headline

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

I think where I depart with that take on things is that I don't think Obama's done anything regressive wrt (for example) abortion; there's been a good amount of treading water and no advancement, but I don't see things as going backwards.

Anything With Bagpipes (HI DERE), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:12 (fifteen years ago)

And yes, I would like for him to move forward instead of staying in place, but I will take staying in place over going backwards.

Anything With Bagpipes (HI DERE), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

Still, as a longtime supporter of expanding our exploitation of domestic oil, this is just awful.

The only thing domestic is the lack of oil on American soil after it is pumped and shipped out to the highest bidder elsewhere in the world. These oil companies do not have allegiance to whatever country they are chartered in. This needs repeating every time this matter comes up, as obvious as it is.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 30 April 2010 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

it's not obvious to people who don't have any concept of how the oil industry actually works.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

the proper role of judges, which is to strike down any and all laws brought before them which violate the Constitution. That core principle is the one Obama is disparaging.

yes very good greenwald, A+

Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

how can anyone take GG seriously any more?? i honestly wouldn't trust him to give me the traffic report these days

Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

by the way the first person to write up a traffic update in the style of GG wins a fancy prize

Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

dan it's not like this argument hasn't been had a million times on this board but when you're a president and say things like "not one penny for abortion" and are quiet as numerous democratically-enacted laws are put into place that severely restrict access to or discourage reproductive services, you're fucking up. legitimizing the opponent's argument by conceding things that you ostensibly believe in does nothing to advance the cause, it just shifts that overton window so more and more bullshit is okay'ed just as long as roe v wade is officially still standing, as meaningless as it becomes

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

Ah, so Tracer's being sarcastic.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

how could you tell??

Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

Progress 'from below' IS more legitimate and durable.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

no it is not more legitimate

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

I like Greenwald because he has a very long track record of being right, so I overlook the hysteria that often infects his writing.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

tbh I'd forgotten about the Oklahoma thing when I wrote that

Anything With Bagpipes (HI DERE), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

Look, am I insane to suspect that maybe letting the rightward impulses of the Right get so extreme that Changey things happen because normal people are horrified by the Right's inhumanity IS the plan? I'm not trying to be naive here and yeah it's a gamble, because hypothetically either the Right could smarten up and stop this shit, or the people could turn out not to care enough to finally act, but basically m white otm.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

It seems far too simple for anyone to have overlooked that possibility, and since no one has mentioned it in well...have they ever? I figure it must have been debunked already somewhere but if that WERE the plan, things are kind of working out perfectly....

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

i have no idea what you are saying

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

she's wondering if there's some kind of jujitsu going on where obama et al give the right wing enough rope to hang themselves with but honestly i think obama would probably prefer people move to the left or at least the center! that said i'm sure there is a strategy to try to isolate republicans politically, paint them as extremists outside the mainstream of america (which isn't a tough sell in a lot of cases, obv)

Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

no it is not more legitimate

I am as much a fan of judicial review and anti-democratic restraints as the next fellow but when there's a serious clash between a clearly expressed will of the people and the courts, the people will prevail, if for no other reason than they can change the law or even amend the Constitution.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

people are fickle. someone gets murdered on the border and all of the sudden racial profling is okay and 4th amendment rights are out the window. a terrorist attack happens and warrantless wiretapping is okay. god forbid somehow a woman should die somehow when having an abortion or something and make national news, and you'll see a massive anti-roe backlash, and way more laws like the ones in oklahoma. when it comes to the scope of constitutional protections, fuck democracy; the courts are supposed to be there to make sure the changing political winds of the time don't encroach on inherent rights

xp if they amend the constitution, then the constitution is different. that's not what we're talking about here

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

there is a strategy to try to isolate republicans politically, paint them as extremists outside the mainstream of america (which isn't a tough sell in a lot of cases, obv)

this is working out pretty well imho

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

the courts are supposed to be there to make sure the changing political winds of the time don't encroach on inherent rights

yep, this is what obama simply wants to do away with. according to glenn greenwald.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

i mean wtf

Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

Republican Party is fractured, split by challenges from loud-mouthed loonies, fewer people identifying as Republicans than ever before, etc.

xp

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

Like if Obama somehow strong-armed the system more to get rid of DADT faster before it was struck down by normal procedures (and I know there's a work-around where he could stop them from discharging people that he hasn't used yet, but otherwise he CAN'T repeal it by exec order, right?)...it would still have been the work of a "liberal" president forcing his "agenda" onto the record, and even if that's his JOB because he, uh, won the election, it's still sort of target-able later, and could be used to focus a lot of anger from some quarters.

If DADT isn't repealed until the military commanders get off their asses and line up and say that the policy is unacceptable and actually HURTS national security and furthermore is contrary to the honor and dignity and sacrifices of soldiers blah blah blah...who, in the long run, is going to argue with them??

If people perceive that having Obama in office makes it "time for change" so they get all agitate-y and then get impatient waiting for him to somehow make it all better, does it make THEM go out and make it better?

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

Look, am I insane to suspect that maybe letting the rightward impulses of the Right get so extreme that Changey things happen because normal people are horrified by the Right's inhumanity IS the plan?

Obama is not so naive about what people are actually like imo

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:45 (fifteen years ago)

and yeah Oklahoma - I don't care if the entire gulf is covered in oil, the silence of the admin on that shit is deafening

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

I don't know if any DADT cases have navigated through the legal system to SCOTUS. That's the opening Obama needs.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

xp haha i will stan for GG forever but he...gets a little worked up sometimes, i think he could take a day off today and it wouldnt hurt anyone. but that obama excerpt from the times IS troublesome to me, for reasons i just said. havent read the whole greenwald piece to see if he analyzes that so i can't defend him or call him out

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

he...gets a little worked up sometimes

i can't even hear him anymore tbh

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

On a lighter note, an excerpt from Sunday's NYT Magazine piece:

President Obama’s young staff and their senior counterparts mix seamlessly and often sweetly. During the primaries, Axelrod once dropped by a party at the Pad — a group house in Chicago where seven campaign staff members lived, worked and played the video game Rock Band. The rumpled, over-50 “Axe,” as nearly everyone calls him, impressed the crowd by playing a game of beer pong. Now in Washington, he still makes the rare appearance at parties for junior staff members. When friends of the 31-year-old deputy communications director, Jen Psaki, gave her an afternoon engagement party at the Cork wine bar near Logan Circle, Rahm Emanuel, the chief of staff, and Axelrod came by, arriving with Lesser.

When Barack Obama’s presidential campaign began on a clear and frigid day in Springfield, Ill., in 2007, the young men and women who would shovel snow in Iowa, crash on couches in Pittsburgh and pass up grad school to join it could not quite grasp that two years later their journey would end at the Oval Office. They also could not imagine all of the unseen difficulties that would await them — everything from a cratering economy and an attempt at a Christmas Day terrorist attack to plummeting poll numbers as their president fell to earth. Showing up to work each day at the most prestigious address in America can feel a bit like finals week in college. They are always on call, always working hard. To these mostly 20-something staff members, Obama is a strict father, one with high expectations, whom they don’t want to disappoint. Michelle Obama is more of a big sister, tapping her toes about when that boyfriend is ever going to propose or playing Cupid by suggesting a match. She gives young, single White House staff members the kind of dating tips she offered in Glamour magazine’s December issue, warning young women: “Cute’s good. But cute only lasts for so long.”

“What do you say to the first lady?” one male staff member, dubious of the first lady’s efforts to set him up, moaned to me during dinner at the J&G Steakhouse in the W Hotel last summer. “ ‘I didn’t like her? She wore a push-up bra?’ ”

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

and yeah Oklahoma - I don't care if the entire gulf is covered in oil, the silence of the admin on that shit is deafening

sometimes I find your priorities baffling tbh

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:51 (fifteen years ago)

LOL at Yenta Michelle.

yes we kenya (suzy), Friday, 30 April 2010 16:55 (fifteen years ago)

more quality legislation from Arizona

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 April 2010 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

BP says:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeC8gC103CA

Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

shakey that is a sweet law

Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

and so timely

Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

If DADT isn't repealed until the military commanders get off their asses and line up and say that the policy is unacceptable and actually HURTS national security and furthermore is contrary to the honor and dignity and sacrifices of soldiers blah blah blah...who, in the long run, is going to argue with them??

If i recall, this happened already, and it didn't make a lick of difference, even to people (McCain) that said they would defer to military commanders on the issue.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 30 April 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

shakey i take it the new law implicitly makes horse-fucking illegal

Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 17:07 (fifteen years ago)

yeah Shakey Mo feel free to pretend you don't recognize "I don't care if" as a rhetorical operator meaning "whether or not"

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 30 April 2010 17:07 (fifteen years ago)

oh my God howling w/laughter at human-animal hybrid law

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 30 April 2010 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

haha dude feel free to get upset when people interpret "i don't care" as "i don't care"

Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I'm really "upset"

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 30 April 2010 17:10 (fifteen years ago)

there is a strategy to try to isolate republicans politically, paint them as extremists outside the mainstream of america (which isn't a tough sell in a lot of cases, obv)

This is the republican strategy as well. The fear of extremism on both sides helps keep American politics in a very narrow (corporate-controlled) range.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 30 April 2010 17:10 (fifteen years ago)

I await Arizona's rulings on generation ships and FTL travel.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Friday, 30 April 2010 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

i think you are, mr impotent rage, i think you are!

Tracer Hand, Friday, 30 April 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)

I hear they're planning on outlawing sex with aliens next

xp

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 April 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)

xp to Adam: well, I said "in the long run". I think everyone knows now that DADT is going to go the way of the dodo but it's going to happen because that junior congressman who is athletic and married and hot and super straight and preppy made it his personal crusade, and the admirals etc spoke out, and there are a lot of bricks going into that particular wall but it's going to be sturdier when it's done.

I would love someone to say what john said, "We're moving forward with or without you; if you don't like it, move to Somalia" but sometimes I get the impression that critics wanted Obama to wave his magic hand and make shit be different than it is now, and haven't we learned anything from the constant challenges to Roe?

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Friday, 30 April 2010 17:18 (fifteen years ago)

Sorry I derailed the higher-order discussion; never mind.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Friday, 30 April 2010 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

don't encroach on inherent rights

xp if they amend the constitution, then the constitution is different. that's not what we're talking about here

I get where you're coming from politically but first of all, that IS what I'm talking about - our rights are not inherent or God-given, no matter what we say, they are rights we have granted ourselves and fight for (hence our worries about potential SCOTUS nominations) and amending the Constitution is every bit as much about politics as passing a bill through Congress or whatever.

Where I sympathize w/Obama is specifically in wanting to avoid a Court that turns 'radical' one direction or another and urging perhaps slow ameliorative change in the political process rather than too much in the judicial process.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 30 April 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

The oil spill is now the size of West Virginia.

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 30 April 2010 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

Which state was it that already banned involuntary RFID implants? Oklahoma? SC?

WTF cat with unfitting music (kingfish), Friday, 30 April 2010 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

Boy, I sure am glad that at least Arizona's legislature has the cojones to tackle the pressing issues of the day

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 30 April 2010 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

as far as I can tell from this clip, at least one AZ rep thinks this bill is really maybe about something else i.e. placating the embryonic-rights-as-a-person brigade

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiCObs7x-Hs

her Facebook suggests she is an awesome & funny person

Kyrsten Sinema: thank God the animal/human hybrid ban bill just passed the Senate and is on its way to the Governor. Now our state will be safe from those dangerous centaurs

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 30 April 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

The oil spill is now the size of West Virginia.

Good thing McCain/Palin didn't win, rah-rah offshore drilling was 80% of their platform.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 30 April 2010 17:48 (fifteen years ago)

...and one of the awesome and funny things is being named Kyrsten Sinema.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Friday, 30 April 2010 17:50 (fifteen years ago)

The whole chip implantation thing is super depressing for me because it was one of my dad's signature issues around the dinner table. He (and lots of other evangelicals) believe that in the leadup to Armageddon the Antichrist will try implant chips in everyone, possibly with the mark of the beast encoded in them. So in other words, this is yet more evidence that Obama is probably the Antichrist.

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 30 April 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

Trying to remember where in Revelations it is mentioned that the Antichrist will attempt to implant microchips in people.

DUM DUM DUM DUMMMMM! (HI DERE), Friday, 30 April 2010 18:01 (fifteen years ago)

i think they are being a little rash. they're totally ruling out the endless possibilities of beast-folk to do their menial tasks after they've rounded up and deported all the brown people

(will) (will), Friday, 30 April 2010 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

Trying to remember where in Revelations it is mentioned that the Antichrist will attempt to implant microchips in people.

its the part about people being branded with the mark of the beast iirc

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 April 2010 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/its-getting-little-chippy

It just seems odd that the same basic people are the source of both paranoia about microchip implantation and actual proposals to carry it out.

goole, Friday, 30 April 2010 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

“I think we should catch ’em, we should document ’em, make sure we know where they are and where they are going,” said Pat Bertroche, an Urbandale physician. “I actually support micro-chipping them. I can micro-chip my dog so I can find it. Why can’t I micro-chip an illegal?"

all class, this guy

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 April 2010 18:10 (fifteen years ago)

btw immigrants are animals FYI

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 April 2010 18:10 (fifteen years ago)

at least in the 50s there really was an existential crisis facing democracy! paranoia, now, just seems like, i dunno, a drug habit. not a frame of mind that is helpful to one's health and well being, but kind of fun (in a dark way) if you get into it.

xp to be fair, i dunno if a guy running in a primary to be a rep from somewhere in iowa is really worth attributing too much to.

goole, Friday, 30 April 2010 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

insects, too: http://wonkette.com/415160/rep-ted-poe-delivers-insane-brilliant-rant-about-illegal-brazilian-grasshoppers-mexicans

(will) (will), Friday, 30 April 2010 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

LOL wow. Surely implanting them w microchips & funding a perpetual monitoring system won't cost anything, it's the ideal sollution. Good idea.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 30 April 2010 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

and amending the Constitution is every bit as much about politics as passing a bill through Congress or whatever.

sure, but you can't have the latter without the former if it involves what we're talking about

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Friday, 30 April 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

Re: the economy, maybe someone who better knows the nuts and bolts of this stuff can help me/us out, but any and all growth or leveling out of the economy, including jobs/employment, seems more or less linked directly to the stimulus, right? So isn't the downward/stagnant trend bound to kick in again if the private sector does not start hiring again before the stimulus funding runs out? I mean, eventually they have to stop paving roads, right? Seems like an unfortunate ticking time bomb for Obama.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 30 April 2010 19:12 (fifteen years ago)

I don't know about "any and all."

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 April 2010 19:15 (fifteen years ago)

The economy is a wild beast. Whoever we elected president was going to experience a recovery on his watch sooner or later.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 April 2010 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

certainly locally the stimulus has helped. I can speak for the Florida university system. Our out and proud GOP university president admitted quite frankly last summer that federal stimulus dollars saved hundreds of jobs.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 30 April 2010 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

Well, it's like that report a few weeks ago with fewer unemployment numbers than expected, even though those low numbers were tied directly to temp census worker hires. And yet it was reported as good news.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 30 April 2010 19:19 (fifteen years ago)

stimulus effects can be pretty well-documented - in general the idea was that the stimulus would stem the bleeding/stop losses/encourage hiring long enough for the economy to re-balance itself and for other sectors to pick back up. In CA, stimulus funds have definitely softened the blow and benefited all kinds of sectors - schools, construction, energy industry, etc.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 April 2010 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

by the way the first person to write up a traffic update in the style of GG wins a fancy prize

― Tracer Hand, Friday, April 30, 2010 11:26 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark

There is a three car accident on I-95 heading south, drivers are advised to seek An Alternate Route

ibaka flocka flame (J0rdan S.), Friday, 30 April 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

more quality legislation from Arizona

― the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, April 30, 2010

well so much for the Retirement Community of Dr. Moreau

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Friday, 30 April 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

So basically state GOPs are milking old Bush state-of-the-union throwaways? Can we hope to see Wyoming launch a mission to Mars?

Doctor Casino, Friday, 30 April 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

The ripple effect of stimulus funds also takes a while to sunside.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 30 April 2010 19:40 (fifteen years ago)

very true - my company is just now getting lined up for various ARRA-funded projects, and many of them are likely to generate contracts that last for the next few years

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 April 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

(well I shouldn't say "just now", this money's been trickling down to us since at least the beginning of the year)

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 April 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

But, what I mean too, Shakey, is that the dollars that you then spend because you still have that job are again infused into the general economy (a la Shakey, of course) and on and on.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 30 April 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2010/04/im-just-noting-timing-here

i was waiting for this, and lo and behold

goole, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v25n1/abortion-black-genocide.html

holy shit. how low is this.

goole, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:09 (fifteen years ago)

x-post I love how Rush refers to "the regime"

curmudgeon, Friday, 30 April 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

http://twitter.com/billmaher/status/13089003490

βΠψ (bnw), Friday, 30 April 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

At the moment that I finished reading the Rush quote, I felt a distinct pang of fecal urgency. I'm just noting the timing here.

Anyway, two more months of "the oil spill is all Obama's fault, don't listen to anyone else who suggests otherwise" + similar rants on fox news should effectively limit any substantive public discourse on the issue.

biologically wrong (Z S), Friday, 30 April 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

http://twitter.com/billmaher/status/13089003490

http://twitter.com/DonaldFagen

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 30 April 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v25n1/abortion-black-genocide.html

holy shit. how low is this.

kathryn joyce, who wrote that piece, is a great & fearless journalist imo...her book quiverfull is just so awesome

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Friday, 30 April 2010 20:58 (fifteen years ago)

Ugh, Republican Senate candidates polling better than the Dems

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/04/in-the-lead-gop-feeling-confident-about-senate-chances.php?ref=fpblg

curmudgeon, Saturday, 1 May 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

you're surprised? the gop is going to massive gains in november.

Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 1 May 2010 18:13 (fifteen years ago)

Hate to even think about it, but if a tropical storm or hurricane happens to hit the gulf coast this year, things could get much, much worse.

The state has lost an area the size of Delaware since 1932 and is still losing about 24 square miles a year. Not all the damage is caused by humans: the hurricanes of 2005 turned about 217 square miles of marsh into water, according to a study by the United States Geological Survey.

Garret Graves, director of the Governor’s Office of Coastal Activities, said that since Hurricane Katrina, extraordinary efforts at restoration had been made and to some extent had slowed the decline. But, he said, a severe oil dousing would change that.

“The vegetation is what holds these islands together,” he said. “When you kill that, you just have mud, and that just gets washed away.”

...

If the volume of oil does not increase drastically, it is likely to ooze down the saltwater channels, hemmed in by grasses. But then there is the potential nightmare of a tropical storm, even a low-level one, with a surge of several feet that sends oil far into the freshwater marshes, which are more fragile and almost impossible to clean.

Unfortunately, the same reliance on fossil fuels that has led to our current environmental disaster is also contributing to the increase in the intensity of tropical storms and hurricanes.

biologically wrong (Z S), Saturday, 1 May 2010 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

According to WSJ, some experts are estimating that the leak may actually be 25,000 BARRELS/DAY (1 million gallons/day), rather than the 5,000 that is currently estimated (and the 1,000 barrels a day estimate from BP before that).

WSJ articles are of course behind a firewall, but Joe Romm excerpts the article at length here.

Ian MacDonald, professor of oceanography at Florida State University who specializes in tracking ocean oil seeps from satellite imagery, said there may already be more than 9 million gallons of oil floating in the Gulf now, based on his estimate of a 25,000 barrel-a-day leak rate. That’s compared to 12 million gallons spilled in the Valdez accident.

...

John Amos, a geologist who has worked as a consultant with companies such as BP, ExxonMobil Corp. and Royal Dutch Shell PLC on tracking and measuring oil spills from satellite data, said NOAA raised its estimates to 5,000 barrels a day after he and his colleagues published calculations that showed the original figures were far too low based on the NOAA data. Amos has also previously participated in a joint industry-NASA study using satellite imagines to detect and track oil slicks.

Mr. Amos said the 5,000 barrels a day is the “extremely low end” of their estimates. He said, based on NOAA maps, a more realistic figure is 20,000 barrels a day.

John Curry, a spokesman for BP working from their Gulf coast central command operations, said the 5,000 barrel a day was a “guestimate.” “There’s a range of uncertainty, and it’s very difficult to accurately gauge how much there is,” he said.

biologically wrong (Z S), Saturday, 1 May 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

Just for comparison's sake, Exxon Valdez was a 12 million gallon spill. Fuck.

biologically wrong (Z S), Saturday, 1 May 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

Putting America to work cleaning up the world's biggest oil spill.

Is this the only ILE thread with spill talk right now? I looked and didn't see any dedicated thread. That shit is tragic (the spill, not the lack of thread). And whatever happened to the stranded leaking tanker on the Great Barrier Reef?

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 1 May 2010 20:39 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, I have a feeling there will be plenty of ridiculous developments in this spill. I'm down w a separate thread. We can use this one for "Obama caused the spill" memes.

Adam Bruneau, Saturday, 1 May 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

I'd say that we could just shift discussion of it to The Energy Thread, but since this shit's likely going to be worse than the Exxon Valdez spill it probably deserves its own thread.

biologically wrong (Z S), Saturday, 1 May 2010 20:46 (fifteen years ago)

Done.

Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 1 May 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)

I'll go ahead and crosslink:

Rolling 2010 Oil Spill Thread

biologically wrong (Z S), Saturday, 1 May 2010 21:03 (fifteen years ago)

Since this pile of bullshit (SHOCKINGLY) comes from David Brooks, may as well post this here.

On PBS Newshour , he said:

The only final thing I would say is, hey, there is no energy source that comes without risk. We were just talking about a mine disaster a couple weeks ago. Every single energy source has risks and costs. That doesn't mean you can't rely on them.

...You know, we have to be able to assess risks in this country. You know, tankers coming from Saudi Arabia are also a risk. Coal is a risk. Everything is a risk. And so we have a terrible episode, but that doesn't mean we should dismiss the whole energy source.

Let me now add my commentary on drugs, specifically caffeine and crack. Listen, both caffeine and crack have risks. You know, with caffeine you might get the heeby jeebies, and with crack you might completely ruin your life, like this crack story from 'jaymehigh' that I just spent 3 seconds googling:

I spend 300 hun a day and ive od 12 times but i cant stop. iv spent over 108,000 last year on crack alone. i hate what this drug has done to my life and my soul. the man im 'with' supports my habit and gives me all my drugs but hes not a user and takes care of all my other needs. i started doing drugs at 12 by smoking weed i told my mom this and she asked if i had any so we startd smoking weed together. I started smoking crack 3 years ago when i lost my fieance to mentel illness and a 'friend' gave me some that her bf whom was a dealer had left at her house so i thought it might kill some of the pain i was so wrong. so now im dealing with depprisson,severe anxzity,anorexia and a bad drug addiction.I would like to make it clear that im not trying to get any one to feal sorry for me, for my problems are my fault and mine alone.ty

So basically, since both of these drugs have risks, we can't really agree that one is less dangerous than the other, can we? We just have to accept both as equal alternatives, and in fact, I believe we should bend over backwards to ensure that lots and lots of people smoke crack.

biologically wrong (Z S), Sunday, 2 May 2010 02:19 (fifteen years ago)

http://i41.tinypic.com/es7zib.jpg

"well as long as we get feedback from 2 opposing points of view on this issue, then I guess we did our job lol"

biologically wrong (Z S), Sunday, 2 May 2010 02:22 (fifteen years ago)

Why am I watching WHCD - Leno is acting like he'll 'be there all week' - or already has been and teh corpse, it smelllll.

portmantovani (suzy), Sunday, 2 May 2010 02:35 (fifteen years ago)

Every single energy source has risks

Have we learned nothing from the wind spill disaster of 2009?

Adam Bruneau, Sunday, 2 May 2010 03:10 (fifteen years ago)

I don't know whether to start a "rolling reproductive rights rollback thread" to post things like this instead of throwing a useless fit on this thread every time that, in the wake of the success of the Stupak amendment, the anti-choice crowd does something like this. there's going to be a lot of this from now on; making abortions more difficult to get is a big part of the anti-choice strategy, and Stupak (and then Oklahoma & now this, and more) makes it clear that it can be a successful strategy. Perhaps people may say "it's just an ultrasound" (I would hope not tho) but forcing anyone to undergo a medical procedure in the name of "information" (especially when the whole "information" schtick is bad faith anyway) is like something out of a nightmare to me.

Bottom line, when the Stupak amendment was introduced I was upset because 1) it sucked obv and 2) I thought its success would signal to the anti-choice crowd that they're in a position to make great gains. It's not like anti-choice people weren't trying shit like this for years, but now they smell victory; there was heated debate in the Florida house over this bill, but it's not like national party leaders were going to get involved, which is what it would take to stop bills like this - a constitutionally protected right is being handed over to the states, which is exactly the way the right has wanted it for years. (overturning Roe is never going to happen, and they know it; limiting access til there's almost none is their strategy.) I urge anyone who is as passionate about the right to choose as I am to donate, monthly if you can, to the National Network of Abortion Funds. People are going to need more help and support as the process of getting an abortion becomes less navigable terrain.

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Sunday, 2 May 2010 12:54 (fifteen years ago)

Somewhere in Minnesota, a recently deceased inventor is SPINNING IN HIS GRAVE AT WARP SPEED. Like, diamonds could get polished in there. I hardly think - actually, I know for a stone cold fact - that if the guy who dreamed up medical ultrasound knew women seeking terminations were being forced to have a medical wand up the jaxy in exchange for access to an abortion, he'd probably say they were de facto being raped by such legislation. This is invasive and it's meant to be, and it's very telling that the only exemptions in the proposed laws are for people who've already been violated. GRRRRR.

It may be that strong objections from people close to this guy could have some moral effect. After all, he married a feminist and then he raised one.

portmantovani (suzy), Sunday, 2 May 2010 13:18 (fifteen years ago)

on the brighter side of this question, given that bright sides are pretty hard to come by in this area lately: Two Convicted in NYC under the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act.

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Sunday, 2 May 2010 13:28 (fifteen years ago)

you're surprised? the gop is going to massive gains in november.

― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, May 1, 2010

Was this inevitable? I know the party out of power usually makes gains but I am trying to understand why so this time--"independent" voters switching away from Obama; Obama supporters staying home; those wonderful ideas the GOP and the Tea Party are pushing???

Could Obama and the Dem Congress have done things differently re the media perception of the bailout, the stimulus plan, and Health care? In hindsight this seems more clear, but given the laziness of the media would it have been possible to sell things better. Maybe I should wait till November and see what happens.

curmudgeon, Sunday, 2 May 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

Should we blame the DNC for putting lousy uncharismatic, unimpressive Dems forward as candidates in so many of the races.

curmudgeon, Sunday, 2 May 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

It's six months to the elections, folks. Chill a bit.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 2 May 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

The main thing that pisses me off about that ultrasound bill is that I'm sure the cost of the ultrasound is passed on to the patient (& probably not covered by insurance). When I got mine in Idaho, they had to show me all these pictures of "here is what does your babby look like in your poor womb right now." Pre 12-weeks they all look like pandashrimp anyway. The doctor had the roll-eye about it, and gave it as much a sarcastic/prefunctory tone she could imbue it with & still remain professional. The point was the same: here's some images we legally must show you to guilt you out of this (that in the hands of Jason Reitman would somehow be effective). I was sold enough on the procedure, and I guess confident/cynical enough about where I thought a zygote stood on the scale of moral significance (nowhere), that it was a "yeah yeah whatever" moment for me, too. But there was no physicality to it, like there is in an ultrasound, and I guess more important to *me* (I was living on $600/month at the time), no added cost.

This is four-dimensional art; the 4th dimension is incredibly powerful. (Abbott), Sunday, 2 May 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

And I still think even that, just showing me the pictures, was a fucked up thing to have to do!

This is four-dimensional art; the 4th dimension is incredibly powerful. (Abbott), Sunday, 2 May 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

Two friends at UCI and I were having our usual lunch on Friday -- both women, both very passionate and thoughtful folks, and I often end up just listening to their talk because I end up learning a lot, gaining new perspectives, etc. In their talk about such things as the Oklahoma nonsense, they made the good point about ultrasounds and the like have had the side effect of essentially only showing the child-to-be rather than the person with the child -- the mothers literally are out of the picture, that the experience is reductive. One of my friends is expecting a child later in the year, so these issues weren't simply academic.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 2 May 2010 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

That is a very good point, succinctly put.

portmantovani (suzy), Sunday, 2 May 2010 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

Was this inevitable? I know the party out of power usually makes gains but I am trying to understand why so this time--"independent" voters switching away from Obama;

So-called "independents" are mostly disillusioned Republicans from 2006 and 2008; now they're returning to the party. I wish more reporters would make this point.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 2 May 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)

GOP at lowest point in party identification in 2 yrs

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/partisan_trends

max, Sunday, 2 May 2010 21:41 (fifteen years ago)

and believe it or not obama remains quite popular compared to congressional democrats

max, Sunday, 2 May 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

too bad obama's not the one running this fall

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Sunday, 2 May 2010 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

yeah. but if i had to guess id say its not just a party-in-power-suffers-losses thing, its an antincumbency thing governed by a widespread perception that DC sucks and doesnt give a shit.

max, Sunday, 2 May 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

They 'want their country back' and they conveniently don't say who from, because it's about change rather than any certain direction. It will be interesting to see how many losses the Republicans suffer this November as well.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 3 May 2010 01:21 (fifteen years ago)

max and alfred are right. that's why it's so important to move promptly through the legislative agenda now. after november, it will be much harder for obama to push legislation through congress.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 3 May 2010 01:24 (fifteen years ago)

btw can we start a new thread after obama picks kagan? this one's getting long

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Monday, 3 May 2010 01:28 (fifteen years ago)

Or we can create an Obama-SCOTUS thread. Alito and Roberts each got one.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 3 May 2010 01:52 (fifteen years ago)

don't ask me how i ended up there because i'm not sure, but the posters on this sean hannity forum thread about the oil rig mostly seem so reasonable that it both heartens me and sort of freaks me out.

women are a bunch of dudes (tipsy mothra), Monday, 3 May 2010 03:12 (fifteen years ago)

I like the little eagle poking it's head into the page from the right, like someone picking the wrong meeting room and, after temporary confusion, will soon wordlessly withdraw.

textbook blows on the head (dowd), Monday, 3 May 2010 03:22 (fifteen years ago)

haha, some of the posters on there start off reasonably well, and then, well...

Quote:
Originally Posted by LibHunter
Seems a coincidence. Cap and Trade coming up and everyone knows domestic drilling is the answer.
my take on the possibilities:

equipment failure 90%
operator error 9%
sabotage 1%

However regardless of the cause, you can see the marxists are already determined to kill US industry.
they killed further drilling. Now with some "safety inspections" they will effectively kill what we already operate.

don't underestimate the left. They REALLY DO want the USA to be a third world country that gives away it's wealth to other countries.
That is not a joke and not hyperbole.
They really are trying to destroy our nation's success and wealth.
__________________
Possumizin' the unpossumized!

party time! (Z S), Monday, 3 May 2010 03:40 (fifteen years ago)

Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized! Possumizin' the unpossumized!

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 3 May 2010 03:48 (fifteen years ago)

"safety inspections"

If You Ain't Gonna Wash It, I Ain't Gonna Eat It (Cattle Grind), Monday, 3 May 2010 03:50 (fifteen years ago)

How many third world countries run around giving wealth to other countries? It's a weird idea.

Doctor Casino, Monday, 3 May 2010 06:22 (fifteen years ago)

He probably meant that USA will be a third world country after Obama gives away all our wealth. When you're talking to the like-minded you don't always have to articulate your bullshit ideas.

President Keyes, Monday, 3 May 2010 13:11 (fifteen years ago)

Libhunter

cuz Bitchhunter was taken

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:19 (fifteen years ago)

Until these guys provide a shred of evidence they deserve to be taken far less seriously than UFO buffs.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)

Or SETI speculators.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

Or believers in Atlantis. Or Alchemists. Or Palm Readers. Or William Cooper.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)

Hell, even less than people that think dinosaur bones were created by the devil to fool them.

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 3 May 2010 15:30 (fifteen years ago)

I thought he did!

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 3 May 2010 15:31 (fifteen years ago)

slow day huh

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Monday, 3 May 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

some of us are too busy being parched to talk politics today

DUM DUM DUM DUMMMMM! (HI DERE), Monday, 3 May 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

Also: Greenwald has posted nothing today.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 3 May 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

yeah he's off for the week, i'm bummed

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Monday, 3 May 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

finals week for me anyway

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Monday, 3 May 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

HES ALWAYS MAD

GLENN GREENWALD IS ALWAYS ANGRY AT STUFF

max, Monday, 3 May 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

oh good, david frum has a column today
http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/05/03/frum.immigration.education/index.html?hpt=C2

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Monday, 3 May 2010 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

"mexicans are america america stupid"

max, Monday, 3 May 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

oh, jeez

max, Monday, 3 May 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

*deep sigh*

max, Monday, 3 May 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

holy hell, I only got three paragraphs into that

DUM DUM DUM DUMMMMM! (HI DERE), Monday, 3 May 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

http://img.wonkette.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/obama-jindal-oil.jpg

Great pic!

Mordy, Monday, 3 May 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

There are just some things I won't read for my own mental health. xp

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Monday, 3 May 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/02/Top_Oil_Producing_Counties.pngThe 'Russia torpedoed our oil rig' is a great meme for the batshits to bring out. They're talking about the same Russia right wingers said would invade Afghanistan 30 years ago because they were running out of oil, making it necessary for us to go there in the first place.

The same Russia that during the Afghanistan fiasco produced more crude oil than Saudi Arabia. The same Russia that today "has the largest petroleum reserves, and is the largest exporter, of natural gas. It has the second largest coal reserves, the eight largest oil reserves, and is the largest exporter of oil."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petroleum_industry_in_Russia

Adam Bruneau, Monday, 3 May 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

was there a seperate thread for the times square bombing attempt?

went ham in a bad way (stevie), Monday, 3 May 2010 18:41 (fifteen years ago)

Improvised Explosive Device in Times Square NYC

DUM DUM DUM DUMMMMM! (HI DERE), Monday, 3 May 2010 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

thanks dan

went ham in a bad way (stevie), Monday, 3 May 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)

shaking my head in shock and disgust at this, if it's true.

Daniel, Esq., Monday, 3 May 2010 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

x-post - That Frum piece...By contrast, Canada (a country of 1/10 the U.S. population that takes proportionately many more immigrants than the United States) allows almost no illegal immigration

"allows" Frum clearly learned alot about geography in school...

curmudgeon, Monday, 3 May 2010 19:58 (fifteen years ago)

was there a separate thread of outrage about the War Criminal's "predator drones" quip at the WHC dinner?

http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/archives/003261.html

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 02:53 (fifteen years ago)

wait which one are we talking about again

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 02:55 (fifteen years ago)

there have been so many presidents, it's hard to figure out which one got suck with "War Criminal"

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 02:55 (fifteen years ago)

only on the rolling teenpop thread

Mordy, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 02:55 (fifteen years ago)

cmon J0rdy, obv the current fucking monster is the relevant one.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 02:56 (fifteen years ago)

not worthy of a separate thread i'm sorry, morbs, but yeah pretty repulsive

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 04:07 (fifteen years ago)

there is a thread about white house dinners

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 04:08 (fifteen years ago)

press things -- i guess it's the wanda sykes one

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 04:08 (fifteen years ago)

yeah the predator drones thing was shitty, the obama equiv of the bush routine where he was looking for wmd under the couch

max, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 04:19 (fifteen years ago)

There should be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 04:21 (fifteen years ago)

not sure how presidential stand up even become an accepted thing that's okay

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 04:21 (fifteen years ago)

i mean i know why, it just still doesn't make much sense

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 04:21 (fifteen years ago)

Shocking...Southern Gulf Coast politicians who hate the Federal government are now begging for Federal help (and its of course nothing new)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/03/AR2010050304265.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 13:24 (fifteen years ago)

Wait, so joking about blowing up the Jonas Brothers if they touch his daughters is repulsive now? Or is this outrage entirely because the joke used the phrase "predator drones"?

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 13:26 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.proprofs.com/quiz-school/upload/yuiupload/1895195213.jpg

Nooooooooooooooooooooooo they are a national treasure!!!!!!!

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 13:27 (fifteen years ago)

Yep that's it, Morbs is a Jonas Brothers fan.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 13:55 (fifteen years ago)

That would make more sense.

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 13:56 (fifteen years ago)

Didn't he work for TRL at one point?

M. Loh, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 13:57 (fifteen years ago)

Let's all get more upset about this joke than we are about the wars it's about. This is like getting mad at the soldiers in that Collateral Murder video. If it upsets you why don't you actively protest the actual wars?

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)

And if you're for the wars then STFU

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)

what the hell is going on

max, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:39 (fifteen years ago)

FWIW, Obama had an assist from some Daily Show writers on the routine.

portmantovani (suzy), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)

no one is "more upset about this joke than we are about the wars it's about"

max, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:40 (fifteen years ago)

Most of ILX seems more exercised about the whole sleep/viking conundrum TBH.

portmantovani (suzy), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:42 (fifteen years ago)

therein lies the answer to all of this mess imo

scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:43 (fifteen years ago)

unfortunately Morbs can't get involved in the viking thread because Dennis Perrin hasn't tweeted his opinion about it yet

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:51 (fifteen years ago)

Ha.

Adam, do you think the US should always be isolationist? Just curious. Not that life for women in Afghanistan is good now, but won't it be worse under the Taliban? Or is it we can't be the world's policemen.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:51 (fifteen years ago)

Well yeah Max, i don't think anyone at ILX are that way. I was speaking more about the culture where you will hear more gripes about this (in blogs, on TV, the papers) than how many people our tax dollars actually killed today.

Curmudgeon, I'm just against using my tax money to kill people.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:57 (fifteen years ago)

eh i dont think anyone whos complaining about the pred drone joke (and i havent heard anyone complain tbh) isnt also complaining abt unchecked executive power

max, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 14:58 (fifteen years ago)

man, welcome to nixonland. the MN GOP just nominated a nutjob over party hack Marty Siefert. meet Tom Emmer!

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/05/gops-candidate-for-gov-in-minnesota-wants-to-nullify-all-federal-laws.php

i'll try to find some local writing on him but the tpm roundup is good ("good")

goole, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

Here is the key quote from the amendment's text: "A federal law does not apply in Minnesota unless that law is approved by a two-thirds vote of the members of each house of the legislature and is signed by the governor. Before voting to approve a federal law, each legislator must individually affirm that the legislator has read the federal law and understands it."

jesus christ

goole, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)

awesome. keep it up GOP!

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)

jfc this guy is enough of a klingon that tpm really doesn't need to lie right in the headline.

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 15:52 (fifteen years ago)

more on tentherism in MN. it's a movement!

http://minnesotaindependent.com/57894/republicans-push-for-minnesota-sovereignty

goole, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

You know what else is a movement?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzsFJolrYuI

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

Republicans in Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District have gone even further: they recently passed a resolution calling for Minnesota to secede from union if the federal government exceeds its authority.

oh for fucks sake. do you how many minnesotans died in the civil war, per capita?? THE UNION FOREVER

xp lol

goole, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 15:58 (fifteen years ago)

I kind of hate the way MN reacts to black ppl

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

AAAAARGHHHHHHHH me too. And Emmer's the very picture of Edina entitlement if you scratch below the surface. You'd also hit blubber, but hey.

portmantovani (suzy), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

edina?? brother is from delano! my old college roomate (RIP) was from delano/loretto, and, damn. white hot right-wingery out there.

search the old rss reader yielded this gem

http://minnesotaindependent.com/53940/bradlee-dean-sharon-lubinski-u-s-marshal

‘Punk’ ministry head Dean: Marshal appointment illegal because Lubinski’s a lesbian

“Homosexuality is against the law in the United States,” says Bradlee Dean, the head of the “punk rock” ministry You Can Run But You Cannot Hide, which brings its overtly religious message to public schools at taxpayer expense. Therefore, he concludes, the appointment by Barack Obama of Minneapolis’ Sharon Lubinski, a lesbian, as a U.S. Marshal is illegal.

On his radio show on AM 1280 The Patriot on Saturday, Dean said, “Sodomy is against the law in the United States. Homosexuality is against the law in the United States.”

...

Dean’s ministry has plenty of political support from big names in Pawlenty’s party. U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann has been involved in You Can Run fundraising efforts, and GOP gubernatorial candidate Tom Emmer was among attendees at the group’s most recent fundraiser. Congressional candidate Allen Quist and Republican Mary Kiffmeyer, former secretary of state, are among the organization’s backers.

goole, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

can we get some clarification on sodomy being against the law in the US pls?

scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

There should be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets.

There should be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets.

There should be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets.

There should be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

http://minnesotaindependent.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/bradleedean.jpg

max, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

WHAT THE HELL IS THAT

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

sadly, that is Minnesota

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

lookin pretty california tbh

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

if you block out the actual face, it looks like a p cool muppet.

scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

Dennis Perrin?

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

anti-sodomy laws were struck down by the SC not too long ago iirc (some Texas case, right Alfred?)

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

There should be a thread for Dennis Perrin tweets.

M. Loh, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

Wiki say cake-eater: Tom Emmer (born March 3, 1961 in South Bend, Indiana and raised in Edina, Minnesota)

portmantovani (suzy), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

i'm just glad life has improved for women in afghanistan

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

you missed out on the word 'surviving'

scrappy dyaoo (darraghmac), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.tnr.com/blog/william-galston/forget-offshore-drilling-until-we-get-some-answers

So here’s my question: what is responsible for MMS’s change of heart between 2000 and 2003 on the crucial issue of requiring a remote control switch for offshore rigs? What we do know is that unfettered oil drilling was to Dick Cheney’s domestic concerns what the invasion of Iraq was to his foreign policy—a core objective, implacably pursued regardless of the risks. Is there a connection between his infamous secret energy task force and the corrupt mindset that came to dominate a key program within MMS? Would $500,000 per rig have been regarded as an unacceptably expensive insurance policy if a drill-baby-drill administration hadn’t placed its thumb so heavily on the scale?

It’s possible that my dark suspicions are baseless, and there’s no connection between the Bush-Cheney administration’s energy policy and the sad events of the past two weeks. But I’m just one guy with a keyboard reading documents and asking questions. I hope that some entity—public or private—with the needed staff and resources will do what’s necessary to get to the bottom of these questions. Before we even consider going forward with any more offshore drilling, we need some answers.

curmudgeon, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 17:37 (fifteen years ago)

Didn't he work for TRL at one point?

lol, like I wdn't have jumped off the roof first. Just in the same building!

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

It would have been a serious mistake to have read the suspect in the attempted Times Square car bombing his Miranda rights, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said Tuesday.

McCain, the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and a longtime leading Republican on national security issues, said he expected the suspect in the case could face charges that might warrant a death sentence if convicted.

"Obviously that would be a serious mistake...at least until we find out as much information we have," McCain said during an appearance on "Imus in the Morning" when asked whether the suspect, 30-year-old Faisal Shahzad, a naturalized American citizen from Pakistan.

"Don't give this guy his Miranda rights until we find out what it's all about," McCain added.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

Shockingly, Glenn Beck is on the ohter side.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

wow, beck getting mighty paul-y

goole, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

And we have Lieberman saying that terror *suspects* should be stripped of their citizenship. Who stole his fucking lunch money in 1927, anyway?

portmantovani (suzy), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 19:30 (fifteen years ago)

Is this what "FOX News and Friends" is like every morning? I mean, do they express their awful opinions so conspicuously?

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

<3ing beck right now

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

kind of

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

Is this what "FOX News and Friends" is like every morning? I mean, do they express their awful opinions so conspicuously?

― cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, May 4, 2010 3:32 PM (18 minutes ago)

3/5 of them are arguably extremely sensible!

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

Wow at Beck being completely the voice of reason.

nevermind312, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

that's like the textbook definition of "a bad sign"

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 19:53 (fifteen years ago)

Dear Senator McCain:

Do you realize you are now more unreasonable than Glenn Beck? You may want to reassess your political positions.

Sincerely, DJP

PS: Your state is a dick.

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

holy shit I don't know who to hate anymore!

Grisly Addams (WmC), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

Is this what "FOX News and Friends" is like every morning? I mean, do they express their awful opinions so conspicuously?

― cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn)

3/5 of them are arguably extremely sensible!

― brandon softerserve (k3vin k.)

NAME THE SENSIBLE ONES

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

What is Beck saying i cant view the video for some reason.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

He's saying that the dude is an American citizen and we have to respect the constitution and read him his rights. Before curly-haired fuckwad can even finish saying "but we're at war" Beck says "Declare it."

Fetchboy, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:09 (fifteen years ago)

No way that's pretty rad & sensible.

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

NAME THE SENSIBLE ONES

― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, May 4, 2010 4:06 PM (2 minutes ago)

judge dude, beck, and the chick, who only said like one thing but seemed to be agreeing with the first two

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

Napolitano is sometimes not bad.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

as long as you don't mean doocy and the brown-haired guy who isn't doocy.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

thing is, surely he's already protected by the Miranda Rights being a US Citizen (he doesn't need them read out to magically confer them on him), so surely it's important just to read them out immediately, so that if he does say anything that proves his guilt it can actually be used in court?

nevermind312, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

right

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

not reading them to him might jepordize the prosecution, i imagine?

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

I think the idea is that if you can get him to incriminate himself, you can declare him an enemy combatant and therefore void the whole Miranda thing? At least I think that's the logic?

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

i guess. but if he doesn't confess in such a clumsy way, i think not reading him his miranda rights is a tremendous risk.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

Well... yeah. Also, IMO grossly unconstitutional.

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

funny how the emotional logic of one issue can cut against the rest... beck & a lot of other right-wingers have re-invested themselves in constitutionalism during the health care fight. because obamacare is of course against all kinds of amendments or clauses or something. maybe beck will want to close guantanamo one of these days. L-0-L.

xps: according to ambinder he may not have been mirandized right away. national security and anti-terrorism laws apparently grant law enforcement some leeway on that tip in these circumstances.

apparently he wasn't just about to leave for dubai, he was on the plane taxiing on the runway, and the tower had to order the plane back. crazy stuff.

goole, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

funny how the emotional logic of one issue can cut against the rest... beck & a lot of other right-wingers have re-invested themselves in constitutionalism during the health care fight. because obamacare is of course against all kinds of amendments or clauses or something. maybe beck will want to close guantanamo one of these days. L-0-L.

law is politics.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:21 (fifteen years ago)

haha poor bastard

goole, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

NAME THE SENSIBLE ONES

― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, May 4, 2010 4:06 PM (2 minutes ago)

judge dude, beck, and the chick, who only said like one thing but seemed to be agreeing with the first two

― brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Tuesday, May 4, 2010 4:10 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Here's Gretchen (the chick you're talking about?) on the event:

"We just interviewed though, the Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, who refuses to say the word terror. Is this a mandate within the Obama administration, not saying the word terror … the reason I ask the question, Mr. Mayor, is because if you have an administration that does not want to say the word terror, then how the heck do you fight terrorism?"

Adam Bruneau, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

with nuclear strikes?

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

i retract my earlier comment. she is very sensible.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

lol @ porn senator

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

Does Beck realize that miranda rights are a creation of "activist judges" on the Supreme Court?

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:46 (fifteen years ago)

senator porn image begging for a poll btw.

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

Gretchen Carlson is a former Miss America from MN who was recently reamed by Jon Stewart for using her uh-leet Stanford degree to shill for Fox and condescend to viewers about what the definition of 'czar' etc. is.

portmantovani (suzy), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:51 (fifteen years ago)

fwiw the goofs on the show didn't want him mirandized because they thought they could find out more stuff about his terrorist buddies if he didn't know his rights. they didn't give a shit about his prosecution and how not mirandizing him could undermine it, either that or they had no idea, judging by their "ohhhhhh" reaction to napolitano's explanation

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 20:55 (fifteen years ago)

Does Beck realize that miranda rights are a creation of "activist judges" on the Supreme Court?

What is the opposition to the miranda rights? I know Scalia would love to revoke them.

nevermind312, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 21:10 (fifteen years ago)

they hinder aggressive law enforcement in a dangerous world.

Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 4 May 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

Conceived during the beloved Warren Court, but when the Rehnquist Court had a chance to overrule them in 2000 Rehnquist himself backed away.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 21:11 (fifteen years ago)

taser first, Miranda later.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqtPUhYdz6M&feature=player_embedded#!

Obama is awesome, awesome, awesome (Dandy Don Weiner), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 21:26 (fifteen years ago)

national security and anti-terrorism laws apparently grant law enforcement some leeway on that tip in these circumstances.

Understandably so up to a point and what jury, if presented w/a compelling case would fail to convict?

What irks me most about these so called Constitutionalists is their utter lack of interest in the ideals of the Founding Fathers: we should torture and humiliate and deprive of dignity, property, respresentation and in one salient case the man's own reason, eh? Why not billet troops in their houses while we're at it? Oh, wait, we kind of do, don't we?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Tuesday, 4 May 2010 21:26 (fifteen years ago)

x-post The account the Fine State Senator Porno gives actually makes some weird sense. He said he opened a file sent to him from someone else (which all stupid old people do) then quickly closed it (which the video backs up). Of course he then mysteriously watches a video of a dog shaking off, so who knows what he was doing.

Also x-post If that were a real Philly crowd, the cops would have been bombarded by batteries.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 4 May 2010 23:29 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2010/05/04/20100504obama-interviews-diane-wood-supreme-court.html

Wow, Obama actually interviewed Diane Wood for the Justice position. That would be amazing if he had the courage to pick her over the middle of road candidates he is otherwise interested in.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 14:21 (fifteen years ago)

He's interviewing the top four.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 14:22 (fifteen years ago)

He had already chatted with the three bland ones.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 14:39 (fifteen years ago)

then heidi and nina and michael and the guest judge have to conference

max, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 14:45 (fifteen years ago)

View Profile
craigdarlingMay-04 @ 5:25 PM Report abuse 015.When a conservitive retires from the court, and he is univerally thought of as the leader of the Liberal side of the court, you know that we have had one hell of a swing in the last 30 years. This man that retires was appointed by Gerald Ford I believe. And now in trying to find someone like him to keep the ballance, everyone is screaming "LIB LIB" sometimes the hard right makes me ill. Please remember, left right or center, if we do not work together we are all in trouble.

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)

man, another day, another reason to drown joe lieberman in a bathtub

goole, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

ooh what did he do now

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:43 (fifteen years ago)

He got out of bed.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:44 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/36741.html

goole, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

...okay, no

That is not right at all. Fuck that shit, seriously.

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

god peter king is such a piece of shit

max, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/05/04/anger-over-arizona-immigration-law-will-be-on-basketball-court/?fbid=tJuobm9Tn_n

on a lighter note, the Suns are awesome

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

who is the worst king in congress, peter or steve

max, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

There is one exception to the existing law: Americans are allowed to serve in the Israel Defense Forces without losing their citizenship.

lol

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)

Ok "Los Suns" is AWESOME.

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

Lieberman plans to introduce a bill that would amend a decades-old law aimed at yanking citizenship from U.S. citizens who fight for a foreign military.

[...]

“If you have joined an enemy of the United States in attacking the United States and trying to kill Americans, I think you sacrifice your rights of citizenship,” Lieberman said.

There is one exception to the existing law: Americans are allowed to serve in the Israel Defense Forces without losing their citizenship.

... wait, so what exactly are they saying about Israel here

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)

xp with Alfred

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)

It's okay to fight for a foreign military like Israel's but not okay if you're with the Taliban.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

What about any other country with mandatory national service? Turkey? Not sure where else has it.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

Germany still has mandatory national service. France did also until not so long ago.

Euler, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

if you join the french foreign legion u are given french citizenship after a while right? seems like an ok deal these days.

but you'd have to guard a pipeline in nigeria or something :/

goole, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

You could probably get around this in Germany by doing hospice service or something similar; a very good (German) friend of mine satisfied his national service requirement that way and I can't imagine that working with sick people would necessitate abdicating your US citizenship.

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

if he owns a copy of the Koran, though, Joe Lieberman will breathe sanctimonious fumes of death on him.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

lieberman is clearly throwing out some red meat here, but let's take this seriously for a second. who or what agency is responsible for stripping someone of citizenship? if it's supposed to get around mirandizing someone, then, it's the arresting officer, right? first responders would have the power to essentially convict someone of sedition.

goole, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

SCOTUS already ruled on this in the forties.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

maybe someone ought to let joe know?

goole, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:08 (fifteen years ago)

im trying but he wont respond to my texts

max, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:08 (fifteen years ago)

try sexting instead

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v134/tracerhand/AMessageFromLarryFlynt.jpg

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

possibly the best thing about this is larry's paperweight

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

hahahahaha

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:12 (fifteen years ago)

oh i didn't even notice that

goole, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:12 (fifteen years ago)

i'm like, big phone, pen holder, another big phone, ohh ok larry, well done

goole, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

I wish our campaign ads were 10% as cogent as that

iatee, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

i wish all paperweights were 10% as evocative as that

Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

Not so much evocative as straight-up demonstrative.

Pazuzu's petals (kenan), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

"I wish our campaign ads were 10% as cogent as that"

"our" as in the Dems? "We're as corrupt as the Repugs, vote for us anyway"

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

If you don't want to get stabbed, don't make yourself a Target.

Greatest contributor: (history mayne), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:21 (fifteen years ago)

"our" as in the Dems?

I meant 'our except for you'. regardless, non-republicans being unable to succinctly get the big issue to the public - this is actually a problem shared by the corrupt war criminal democratic party and whatever crazy person on a box you currently support.

iatee, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

But of course.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

Forgot that his name is Samuel Wurzelbacher and not "Joe".

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 18:13 (fifteen years ago)

Obey is bone tired. It's all Bush's fault.

Obama is awesome, awesome, awesome (Dandy Don Weiner), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

the house needs a guy from road rules

goole, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

iatee, you mean crazy people on boxes who don't pointlessly kill people

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)

maybe YOU'RE crazy! /organ sting

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

how's this for nutty tea leaf reading, a comment on pareene's salon blog caught my eye

got an inside scoop

It's most likely not going to be Kagen. My source says she has already been eliminated as a possibility. Think flowers around your neck. We'll see if the source is reliable.
—bernbart Read bernbart's other letters
Permalink
Flag

let's assume this is crazy bullshit, but what does "think flowers around your neck" even mean. she went to hawaii? is this some birther shit, or... civil unions... or what.

yes i know, parsing blog comments, a new low. help me out here.

goole, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

Think flowers around your neck

Lei...? does one of the potential nominees have some variation of this in their name?

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

Well, there's E-LEI-na Kagan... oh wait

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.rockjamradio.cz/page/downloads/u47/leibach.jpg bad idea

textbook blows on the head (dowd), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

i really hope obama is bold and he picks Wood. She's the only genuine liberal.

nevermind312, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

Lei...? does one of the potential nominees have some variation of this in their name?

Garland, anyone?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

ah but of course

goole, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

I was casting about for who the other two being considered actually were but couldn't find it. but duh yeah if one of them is named Garland

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

aw I wanted to make more stupid lei jokes

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

yep, garland. I just got that a few minutes ago.

If he chose him, that'd surely be just to get an easy confirmation. But he's the most centrist out of the potential picks so it would definitely move the court even further to the right.

nevermind312, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:31 (fifteen years ago)

I was casting about for who the other two being considered actually were but couldn't find it. but duh yeah if one of them is named Garland

& some Sidney Thomas guy:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Mxvt5nibaOc/SlfFKtFGvLI/AAAAAAAAAng/CKQ5_5rTKaw/s320/Judge+Sidney+Thomas.jpg

nevermind312, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

http://charlespaolino.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/zdorothy.jpg

I guess I have to move on to these jokes

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:33 (fifteen years ago)

well let's not go too far on some blog comment!

goole, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

YOUR NEXT SUPREME COURT JUSTICE:

http://www.bubbygram.com/performers/liza.jpg

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

http://twitpic.com/1lccro

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:38 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/05/lee-fisher-ohio-senate-20_n_563676.html

This stuff really, really depresses me.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

what the

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

smooth jam tho

velko, Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

dude that's fucking hysterical Matt.

Obama is awesome, awesome, awesome (Dandy Don Weiner), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

I want that link in my sig

Obama is awesome, awesome, awesome (Dandy Don Weiner), Wednesday, 5 May 2010 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

this is probably the right thread for this

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/commentary/news/story?page=brewer/100505

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 02:26 (fifteen years ago)

(wherein jan brewer writes an op-ed for espn.com)

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 02:27 (fifteen years ago)

Imagine a sporting event in which rules have been agreed to for 70 years, but the umpires refuse to enforce those rules. It makes no sense.
Urging Major League Baseball to take away next year's All-Star Game from Phoenix is the wrong play.
Essentially, our border leaks like a team with a last-place defense.

Mordy, Thursday, 6 May 2010 02:37 (fifteen years ago)

Also fuck an ESPN

Mordy, Thursday, 6 May 2010 02:38 (fifteen years ago)

But of course.

― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, May 5, 2010 11:07 AM Bookmark

Not much of a big deal. FFS, I was elected as a precinct officer. All that means is you get to represent your precinct (of 1000 ppl or so) at party meetings.

moderator requiem forum (The Reverend), Thursday, 6 May 2010 02:45 (fifteen years ago)

espn.com baseball columnist Rob Neyer wrote forcefully against the AZ law, btw

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 6 May 2010 02:48 (fifteen years ago)

Grover Norquist on "teabagger"

"This remark is the equivalent of using the 'n' word. It shows contempt for middle America, expressed knowingly, contemptuously, on purpose, and with a smirk. It is indefensible to use this word. The president knows what it means, and his people know what it means."

http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2010/05/its-not-that-youre-racist/56281/

Dave Weigel's brief history of teabagging

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/05/a_peoples_history_of_teabag.html?wprss=right-now

he was there at the beginning. what a thing.

goole, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

"This remark is the equivalent of using the 'n' word."

^^ is this the most offensive thing said by a nationally-prominent conservative this year?

max, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

sad that there are even other contenders

max, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

"TEABAGGER"? OH I GET IT!!!

i will fight for my right to repeat this hilarious joke whenever i get the chance

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

"his people"

goole, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

Excellent Bloggingheads conversation b/w Greenwald and David Frum. It's refreshing to hear two smart guys from opposite sides speak this fluently.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:12 (fifteen years ago)

"This remark is the equivalent of using the 'n' word."

pretty sure black people didn't coin the 'n' word term themselves.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

pretty sure the tea party people didn't coin "teabaggers" as a term for themselves either

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

The turning point, as The Week points out, came when MSNBC's Rachel Maddow and CNN's Anderson Cooper started making "teabag" jokes.

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

that maddow show was hilarious!

goole, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

I thought gays and lesbians didn't get along.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

namecalling is the great uniter

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

Uh, Grover, it's not anyone else's fault that the Teabaggers are too old, too incurious or too partisanly insular to use Urban Dictionary or Google before naming their 'movement'. Also, stop whining, bitch.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

they didn't name their movement, giggling five-year-old "news" anchors like maddow and olbermann did

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

bitch

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

/jesse pinkman

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

Laugh? Cry? Both?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

massive eye roll

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

that quote structure in the atlantic article is retarded, i thought the bolded text was an excerpt from that obama book

brandon softerserve (k3vin k.), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

pretty sure the tea party people didn't coin "teabaggers" as a term for themselves either

um yes they did

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

why are the stupid people getting press? I am much more concerned over what the smart people are doing

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

yeah they definitely did.

confederacy-themed bumper sticker enthusiast (will), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

Fitzpatrick, a retired Navy commander, is a leading member of the American Grand Jury (AGJ), which seeks to convene a grand jury of citizens to indict President Obama for treason, on the grounds that he's not a natural-born U.S. citizen.

treason... not a citizen... treason... not a citizen.

huh.

goole, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

read that David Weigel Washington Post blog post

"The answer to the first question really is indisputable -- the word was first used by the tea party movement itself. In some cases it was by people who did not know that "teabag" is also a sexual term.* In other cases, protesters knew that the term was sexual and hurled it at the Democrats. Here, for example, is a photo I took in February 2009."

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

treason... not a citizen... treason... not a citizen.

these people are stupid, but there is a difference between being a citizen and being a natural-born citizen FYI

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

Tracer, it took off because some old galoot was vox popping about 'don't tea bag us, or we'll tea bag you.' Then everyone who's read Dan Savage and seen Pecker got involved via the LOL.

sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

like der Governeggor is a citizen, but he is not a natural-born citizen and can't occupy the office of the president

xp

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

why are the stupid people getting press? I am much more concerned over what the smart people are doing

I agree. Until they actually elect people or partake in realistic policy discussion, take it to the dedicated thread, or create a new one one.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

How has Ahnuld done as governer, in your opinion?

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

yeah whatever dudes, it's kind of like saying the term "politically correct" was invented by leftists (which it technically was) - who cares? that is brain-dead "he started it" rationalization of poor behavior imo

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

grover norquist IS one of the smart ones!

goole, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

xp: ... that doesn't really seem to be agreeing with me, Adam, since you are criticizing ppl who post here and I am criticizing what various media outlets are focusing on

xxp: I'm talking about the dudes who got arrested trying to make citizen's arrests

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

treason... not a citizen... treason... not a citizen.

We now have a name for the next US Politics thread.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

it's kind of unsettling how many genuinely unhinged people there are out there, and how many of them have access to automatic weapons

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

For 'unsettling' you mean 'unsurprising' I hope.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

:(

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

How has Ahnuld done as governer, in your opinion?

Actually about as well as anyone could expect in a State which is essentially ungovernable right now.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I agree w/Michael re: Ahnuld. I hate him on a personal level, fwiw. On a political level, he hasn't been a total loss and he's taken leftier positions that no one else in the CA GOP would take re: our environmental laws and standards, which is definitely a good thing. But our state gov't is basically crippled.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

Thirding all that. It's one reason why I think the governor's race this year is kinda already a dull washout.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:45 (fifteen years ago)

He doesn't really owe the CA Republican Party or rightwing voters much - he parachuted into office from a popular re-call.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

the other good reason being the candidates

xp

iatee, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

the other good reason being the candidates

Are you implying that the prospect of Meg Whitman and Jerry Brown making Phil Angelides seem like Freddie Mercury is wrong somehow?

*dies*

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

does jerry brown even *want* to be governor this time around? I think he just needs a job.

iatee, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

"shit, this cable bill is ridiculous; I'd better run for mayor"

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

er governor

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

california is just a really, really big city to east coast people

iatee, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

not entirely untrue

iatee, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

It's three big cities, some random enclaves, and a bunch of mountains, desert and a lot of manure.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

and one day, meg whitman, it will all be yours

iatee, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:59 (fifteen years ago)

What are the three big cities, Ned?

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

LA, San Francisco, Fresno

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

Solvang, King City, Alameda

iatee, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

Weed, Arcata and that one dirt-hippie hangout.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

More seriously -- LA, SF, San Diego.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:07 (fifteen years ago)

Pacific Beach, Newport Beach, Hermosa Beach

kkvgz, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

Redondo beach, avila beach

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:10 (fifteen years ago)

Sacramento, Santa Cruz, Riverside

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

Corona del Mar, Yuba City, Weaverville

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)

La Jolla, Westwood, Goleta

kkvgz, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)

why does anyone want to be governor of california? who was the last governor of that state that didnt leave office a battered broken shadow of his former self?

max, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:13 (fifteen years ago)

san diego and LA are the same city to me, from a Nor Cal perspective.

akm, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:13 (fifteen years ago)

Pleasanton, Palo Alto, Anaheim

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

Actually the whole state's run out of this place:

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Petrolia,+CA&sll=40.325784,-124.286495&sspn=0.002253,0.004136&gl=us&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Petrolia&t=h&z=11

san diego and LA are the same city to me, from a Nor Cal perspective.

If Camp Pendleton didn't exist, it would be.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:15 (fifteen years ago)

wow this is fascinating

http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=949

goole, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:15 (fifteen years ago)

i mean pete wilson, i know, btu that was like a million years ago

max, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:15 (fifteen years ago)

Actually why I am not surprised to discover that Alexander Cockburn lives in Petrolia.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:16 (fifteen years ago)

the fate of the governor of california doesn't have much to do w/ what the governor of california can do. I guess meg whitman and jerry brown have nothing to lose w/ a shitty gamble. gavin newsom probably improved his long-term career prospects by not getting the nom.

iatee, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:19 (fifteen years ago)

Damn, Ned. You didn't even rise to my Irvine snub?

kkvgz, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

You weren't snubbing Irvine enough!

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:27 (fifteen years ago)

Man, I tried. : )

kkvgz, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:31 (fifteen years ago)

san diego and LA are the same city to me, from a Nor Cal perspective.

And to the US Postal Service, we live in the San Jose Bay Area.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

I'd imagine even most people in San Jose would rather that they lived in the 'San Francisco Bay Area'

iatee, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

(in both senses)

iatee, Thursday, 6 May 2010 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

i mean pete wilson, i know, btu that was like a million years ago

is this a joke

yeah I dunno why anyone would wanna be governor (esp someone who's been governor once before already!)

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

^^^father of state's energy deregulation debacle FYI (not to mention prop 187)

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

as I said, dude needs a job and it's a tough economy

xp

iatee, Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

gavin newsom probably improved his long-term career prospects by not getting the nom.

eh I dunno he just lowered his sights to AG (which I hope he won't win because he's a douchebag)

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

lt gov you mean

iatee, Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

right, sorry

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

WHAT IS THE POINT OF A SEPARATE ELECTION FOR LT GOV?? god who designed this state anyway.

goole, Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:28 (fifteen years ago)

TO MITIGATE A BUNCH OF EXURBAN FOOLS WHO MAY VOTE IN THEIR DOUCHEBAGGER OF CHOICE. Other than that, I don't know.

sharia twain (suzy), Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:30 (fifteen years ago)

Ladies and gentlemen, Mike Curb!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Curb

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

For much of 1979 and the first half of 1980, Brown was out of state, seeking the Democratic nomination for President of the United States against the embattled incumbent, Jimmy Carter. For approximately one year, Curb served in Brown's absence to take on the role of acting governor, sometimes vetoing legislation or issuing executive orders, yielding results that were at odds with Brown's liberal politics. Curb's actions resulted in litigation, but his legal right to act when Brown was out of state was upheld by the Supreme Court, setting an important precedent for future lieutenant governors.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

race car owner (in both NASCAR and IRL)

lol

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

kamala harris is running for AG, she is awful. newsom is a douche but seems particularly suited to the douchey job of junior fake governor of nothing

akm, Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:41 (fifteen years ago)

wouldn't put it past him to have Jerry whacked so he could take the big chair, tbh

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

market is seriously crashing

βΠψ (bnw), Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

Oh shit!

kkvgz, Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

oof

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

do we get to bomb Greece yet?

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:53 (fifteen years ago)

http://quizilla.teennick.com/user_images/M/mattababy/1075690038_turesgiant.jpg

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:53 (fifteen years ago)

i am never buying a mutual fund again. i can sell it tomorrow after i get fucked? thanks bro!

βΠψ (bnw), Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:55 (fifteen years ago)

mutual funds are a scam

goole, Thursday, 6 May 2010 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

stocks are a scam

max, Thursday, 6 May 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)

buy low sell high iirc

confederacy-themed bumper sticker enthusiast (will), Thursday, 6 May 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

~~money is an illusion~~

max, Thursday, 6 May 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

WOAH

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Thursday, 6 May 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

Congratulation to whoever is making money right now.

Adam Bruneau, Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/05/06/dennis.real.tea.party/index.html?hpt=T3

The Tea Party: kind of a Hydra/Jedi hybrid

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

"The Dallas Tea Party has subdivided the Dallas-Fort Worth metro region into ZIP codes and voting districts. Each zone has one or more neighborhood coordinators charged with recruiting members, organizing meetings, getting out the vote and spreading the Tea Party message of fiscal responsibility, the rule of law and national sovereignty to their friends and neighbors."

you know, if this was the sum total, or even the essence of their "message" i might lay off these guys, but...

confederacy-themed bumper sticker enthusiast (will), Thursday, 6 May 2010 20:56 (fifteen years ago)

yeah whatever dudes, it's kind of like saying the term "politically correct" was invented by leftists (which it technically was) - who cares? that is brain-dead "he started it" rationalization of poor behavior imo

― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:32 (4 hours ago)

It was invented by leftists? I've always thought the term and concept was an invention of the right used to disparage equal protection laws/gestures of respect to minorities.

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 6 May 2010 21:25 (fifteen years ago)

it's an old-line leninist term!

goole, Thursday, 6 May 2010 21:29 (fifteen years ago)

i think it's just the way they hiss it.

confederacy-themed bumper sticker enthusiast (will), Thursday, 6 May 2010 21:29 (fifteen years ago)

xpost

confederacy-themed bumper sticker enthusiast (will), Thursday, 6 May 2010 21:29 (fifteen years ago)

pretty sure the tea party people didn't coin "teabaggers" as a term for themselves either

― Tracer Hand, Thursday, May 6, 2010 4:15 PM (5 hours ago) Bookmark'

well, some of them did.

Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 6 May 2010 21:32 (fifteen years ago)

Crash was due to an typological error. Someone misenterred a number in a large sale of stock, which set off a domino reaction. About 2/3 of the loss was recovered by closing.

moderator requiem forum (The Reverend), Thursday, 6 May 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)

Is there any way Joe Lieberman can be reset?

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 6 May 2010 22:56 (fifteen years ago)

or accidentally deleted?

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 May 2010 22:59 (fifteen years ago)

mutual funds are a scam

― goole, Thursday, May 6, 2010 1:59 PM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

stocks are a scam

― max, Thursday, May 6, 2010 2:03 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

~~money is an illusion~~

― max, Thursday, May 6, 2010 2:07 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark

wtf

NEW YORK: Citigroup is investigating a rumour that one of its traders entered a trade that helped precipitate a drop of almost 1,000 points in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, a spokesman for the bank said on Thursday.

Market sources said the erroneous trade may have involved shares of the so-called E-Mini, a stock market index futures contract that trades on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange's Globex trading platform. The composition of the E-Mini is similar to the stocks in the S&P 500.

βΠψ (bnw), Thursday, 6 May 2010 23:03 (fifteen years ago)

http://discussions.orlandosentinel.com/20/orlnews/os-longwood-library-gossip-girl-books20100505/10

Sherman Helmsley Teabag (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 6 May 2010 23:26 (fifteen years ago)

This is one more reason to love interlibrary loan.

This is four-dimensional art; the 4th dimension is incredibly powerful. (Abbott), Thursday, 6 May 2010 23:39 (fifteen years ago)

^^^^^^ this. Seriously I am not far away from sinking Florida into the ocean singlehandedly. It would be my contribution to mankind!

Sherman Helmsley Teabag (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 6 May 2010 23:40 (fifteen years ago)

I'm in Florida and use interlibrary loan all the time. Send a boat for me.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 6 May 2010 23:41 (fifteen years ago)

Oh don't worry there will be warnings sent to the worthy at least 48 hours in advance....

Sherman Helmsley Teabag (Cattle Grind), Thursday, 6 May 2010 23:42 (fifteen years ago)

library books: where teenagers learn about the world

rent, Friday, 7 May 2010 00:31 (fifteen years ago)

lol

moderator requiem forum (The Reverend), Friday, 7 May 2010 01:27 (fifteen years ago)

I hate being pressured to have a 401k and being in the gamgster, rumor-controlled criminal stock market

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 May 2010 01:54 (fifteen years ago)

i feel that, but it's not like there's any place that your money isn't somehow implicated. even under your mattress it's going to be affected by whatever happens in gangstaland.

women are a bunch of dudes (tipsy mothra), Friday, 7 May 2010 03:03 (fifteen years ago)

invest in gold lol

moderator requiem forum (The Reverend), Friday, 7 May 2010 03:22 (fifteen years ago)

yeah whatever dudes, it's kind of like saying the term "politically correct" was invented by leftists (which it technically was) - who cares? that is brain-dead "he started it" rationalization of poor behavior imo

― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 6 May 2010 16:32 (4 hours ago)

It was invented by leftists? I've always thought the term and concept was an invention of the right used to disparage equal protection laws/gestures of respect to minorities.

Yes, as a joke. It was used to make fun of people who were a little too rigid in their cultural sensitivity--the first time I ever saw it in print was an item about a "Political Incorrectness Party" held by some women's studies group at some college somewhere in the early 1980s that involved curlers, makeovers, and Rick James records.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Friday, 7 May 2010 03:23 (fifteen years ago)

kagan

max, Friday, 7 May 2010 13:20 (fifteen years ago)

:(

max, Friday, 7 May 2010 13:20 (fifteen years ago)

DRIVING NEXT WEEK -- Look for President Obama to name his Supreme Court pick Monday, and look for it to be Solicitor General Elena Kagan, a former Harvard Law dean. The pick isn’t official, but top White House aides will be shocked if it’s otherwise. Kagan’s relative youth (50) is a huge asset for the lifetime post. And President Obama considers her to be a persuasive, fearless advocate who would serve as an intellectual counterweight to Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Scalia, and could lure swing Justice Kennedy into some coalitions The West Wing may leak the pick to AP’s Ben Feller on the later side Sunday, then confirm it for others for morning editions. For now, aides say POTUS hasn’t decided, to their knowledge. Kagan pic and bio

max, Friday, 7 May 2010 13:20 (fifteen years ago)

Oh gross.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 13:26 (fifteen years ago)

Democrats and their obsession with coalitions.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 13:26 (fifteen years ago)

"President Obama considers her to be a persuasive, fearless advocate" for executive privilege

max, Friday, 7 May 2010 13:40 (fifteen years ago)

Glad to see that trying to win Anthony Kennedy is the administration's highest benchmark.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 13:41 (fifteen years ago)

Whoever is briefing Obama on judicial nominees is sadly, just as cautious and middle of the road as the Robert Rubin team that put together Obama's bland financial team. Brennan was a fearless liberal and persuasive, but Obama is ignore the first part of that equation.

I wish some member of our wonderful mainstream media had challenged the White House re Kagan and executive power. But the issue seems to only exists in the liberal blog world.

curmudgeon, Friday, 7 May 2010 13:56 (fifteen years ago)

is ignoring

curmudgeon, Friday, 7 May 2010 13:56 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-05-01/the-next-harriet-miers/

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 14:17 (fifteen years ago)

Yesterday, I read everything Elena Kagan has ever published. It didn't take long: in the nearly 20 years since Kagan became a law professor, she's published very little academic scholarship—three law review articles, along with a couple of shorter essays and two brief book reviews. Somehow, Kagan got tenure at Chicago in 1995 on the basis of a single article in The Supreme Court Review—a scholarly journal edited by Chicago's own faculty—and a short essay in the school's law review.

See, this alone makes me say no.

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 14:22 (fifteen years ago)

The Miers analogy is a real stretch though. GOP support for Miers collapsed because even they realized she knew shit about shit. Kagan looks brighter. On the other hand, she apparently couldn't recognize a string of cases cited by Justice Kennedy during oral argument for the Citizens United case (Kennedy himself had to bail her out).

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 14:28 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe Kagan knows where the bodies are hidden.

The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Friday, 7 May 2010 14:31 (fifteen years ago)

welp

sveltko (k3vin k.), Friday, 7 May 2010 15:19 (fifteen years ago)

suck it, GOP

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)

people expecting massive Republican gains in November are retarded FYI

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)

i is retarded, apparently

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 7 May 2010 17:01 (fifteen years ago)

It's a long way to December.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:01 (fifteen years ago)

November even.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:02 (fifteen years ago)

re: Kagan and executive power, was this discussed at all? (A friend of mine who took her constitutional law course and is super-psyched about the rumors flying around at the moment sent it to me.)

http://www.slate.com/id/2251138

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:02 (fifteen years ago)

Grassley polling below 50%

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

The only problem with her statements (which are comforting) is how late she made them. Every Democrat by 2007 had turned against executive power. Dellinger is also a Clinton toadie.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

Yes it was, HI DERE, but mainly in the context of Greenwald's hyperventilating about it which probably isn't the fairest airing of the issues.

The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:07 (fifteen years ago)

oh they'll pick up some seats, but all these primary challengers from the extreme fringes of the party, in-fighting with fundraisers, continuing upswing in the economy is going to significantly dampen the effects of any prevailing antic-incumbency mood. Dems will keep their majority in the House and probably the Senate, they just won't be as big.

xp

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:07 (fifteen years ago)

I'm not super-concerned about Kagan, personally. it's kinda difficult to prejudge most SC nominees, with some glaring exceptions (Thomas, Bork, Scalia, Meiers)

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

I bring it up only because the dude who sent it to me is so completely in favor of her being nominated; he adored her class (actually I think he said it was the best class he took in law school) and is basically like "if you want someone on the left who will stop Scalia from recasting conservative talking points as somehow being intrinsically baked into the Constitution, she is perfect". It's the first time I've heard someone speak so overwhelmingly glowingly of her and he dealt with her in the context of analyzing constitutional law.

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

is there really that much evidence that she isn't ^^^that?

iatee, Friday, 7 May 2010 17:15 (fifteen years ago)

Well no; there isn't much evidence of her being anything, which is what made me nervous.

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:16 (fifteen years ago)

really I should say "makes" because I'm still nervous

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:16 (fifteen years ago)

Meanwhile, weird-ass death financial reform circus last night:

Last night the Too-Big-To-Fail amendment, a strong proposal put forward by Delaware’s Ted Kaufman and Ohio’s Sherrod Brown, got pulverized in a late-night vote. An amazing 27 Democrats voted against the bill, which would have put hard caps on the size and risk profiles of financial companies.

In a wittily insulting footnote to this massacre, Alabaman Obfuscation King Richard Shelby, the guy who has been leading the transparently lobbyist-driven and shockingly (even by DC standards) cynical Republican filibusters of this bill, actually voted for the Brown/Kaufman amendment. I have no idea if this was Shelby’s idea of a joke or what, but somehow seeing this bloated old hack cast a quixotic Yea for this urgently necessary measure while 27 Democrats slithered back into the lobbyist camp to cast Nay votes was the most obnoxious part of this whole sordid affair.

http://trueslant.com/matttaibbi/2010/05/07/death-of-brownkaufman-a-huge-blow/

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

presumably obama has a better idea of how she's going to rule on things than we do. I really like the possibility of an academic on the court and there's a decent possibility that we'll be getting a fantastic deal if you look at this on the 'how liberal' vs. 'how much of a confirmation fight' scale. imo the biggest drawback is the 'ugh more harvard' aspect.

iatee, Friday, 7 May 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

the problem with greenwald's ranting in this instance i think is that it's almost all based on really tenuous stuff. he may end up being right, but i think he's being over-alarmist in this case in tracing out his opinions based on obama's embrace of some bush policies & stuff like kagan not hiring enough minority professors when she was at harvard. we don't have the same window into her beliefs/opinions that we did w/ sotomayor, but i have to imagine that on very many either/or supreme court decisions, this woman is not going to be falling on the side of antonin scalia.

J0rdan S., Friday, 7 May 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

Kagan hired plenty of minority professors! They all just happened to be Jewish.

also iatee, normally I'd be there with you on the "ugh no more Harvard" tip but I had an awesome reunion last weekend so fu

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

'nomally I'd be with you on the 'ugh no more harvard' but then I remembered....I went to harvard'

iatee, Friday, 7 May 2010 17:31 (fifteen years ago)

the problem with greenwald's ranting in this instance i think is that it's almost all based on really tenuous stuff

Because Kagan's record is itself tenuous.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:32 (fifteen years ago)

50% of the time, the easiest way to make someone go "ugh, no more Harvard" is for them to go to school there

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:33 (fifteen years ago)

kagan's record being tenuous isn't necessarily a bad thing! anything that would make us support her would also make it that much harder for her to get on the court.

iatee, Friday, 7 May 2010 17:34 (fifteen years ago)

That's a weird way of looking at things.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:34 (fifteen years ago)

If Obama's so worried about a nominee going up against Scalia, then Diane Wood's got the brains and bonafide liberal cred; but as usual he wants to take the road of least conflict.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

That statement is interesting; is the road of most conflict always the correct choice?

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:37 (fifteen years ago)

kagan's record being tenuous isn't necessarily a bad thing! anything that would make us support her would also make it that much harder for her to get on the court.

― iatee, Friday, May 7, 2010 12:34 PM (0 seconds ago) Bookmark

i actually don't agree with this sentiment at all bcuz i couldn't imagine an obama SC nominee getting blocked right now

i just have a hard time believing that obama would pick someone who is destructively conservative. if he picks kagan, would she be the #1 best nominee that he could pick? i'm sure that she isn't, but when has any president ever picked the person that would do the best to move a 'progressive' agenda forward? never?

J0rdan S., Friday, 7 May 2010 17:38 (fifteen years ago)

I'm not the anti-Kagan person Greenwald is, but all I've read about Wood suggests that while Kagan is an unknown whose lack of a paper trail (and blah performance as solicitor general) Obama sees as a plus, Wood has the writings and the record. Plus, the Dems have more votes in the Senate than Bush did in 2005 and 2006 – why is Obama so afraid of being progressive?

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:38 (fifteen years ago)

i just have a hard time believing that obama would pick someone who is destructively conservative. if he picks kagan, would she be the #1 best nominee that he could pick? i'm sure that she isn't, but when has any president ever picked the person that would do the best to move a 'progressive' agenda forward? never?

You're forgetting, though, that people are expecting Obama to be super-progressive because he's black.

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

That statement is interesting; is the road of most conflict always the correct choice?

I can't think of any "hard" decision that Obama's made in sixteen months.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

and by "hard" I mean "using his `political capital' to get a liberal policy passed through the Congress."

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

All those Tea Partiers that died on Capitol Hill in March cry to you from their graves, Alfred.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 7 May 2010 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

(first person who calls this iteration of HCR "liberal" gets an envelope full of Scalia nose hairs).

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

when has any president ever picked the person that would do the best to move a 'progressive' agenda forward? never?

FDR: Hugo Black, Frank Murphy, William O. Douglas Wiley Rutledge

JFK: Arthur Goldberg

LBJ: Fortas and Thurgood Marshall

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

xpost -- definitely not a preexisting condition.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 7 May 2010 17:44 (fifteen years ago)

I'm with Alfred. And with Greenwald on his view that why pick Kagan if you have to guess what she might be like, when you can pick Diane Wood or others whose record demonstrates a much stronger committment to progressive jurisprudence. The Republicans are gonna howl no matter who is chosen.

http://coloreddemos.blogspot.com/2010/04/some-questions-about-elena-kagan.html

http://www.salon.com/news/elena_kagan/index.html?story=/opinion/2010/05/07/law_professors_kagan_white_house

Remember that Obama slogan "incrementalism we can believe in." Oh that wasn't it.

"How much credit should she be given for putting a few conservatives on the faculty of what claims to be the great law school of America?" said Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee. "Not much." Ha

curmudgeon, Friday, 7 May 2010 17:52 (fifteen years ago)

You're forgetting, though, that people are expecting Obama to be super-progressive because he's black.

No, he's super-progressive because he's not a Republican. Plus since we live in an age where it is politically bad to be associated with the word "progress", the best way to move the country ever-rightward is by hyperbole.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 7 May 2010 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

No, he's super-progressive because he's not a Republican.

And he's black.

Thinking that the right are the only people using racially-coded criticism is a mistake.

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:05 (fifteen years ago)

oh they'll pick up some seats, but all these primary challengers from the extreme fringes of the party, in-fighting with fundraisers, continuing upswing in the economy is going to significantly dampen the effects of any prevailing antic-incumbency mood. Dems will keep their majority in the House and probably the Senate, they just won't be as big.

i fear a gop wave in november. but i hope you're right.

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 7 May 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)

I FEAR A WAVE

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 7 May 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)

If the Dems are worried about losing seats or losing their majority altogether in November, then they should fight now for the most progressive nominee, cuz it ain't gonna get better, folks, when Senate Majority Leader McConnell is in charge.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

Kagan is exactly the sort of justice that could turn right over the years. We hardly know anything about her. It's a really dangerous choice.

nevermind312, Friday, 7 May 2010 18:13 (fifteen years ago)

Kagan is exactly the sort of justice that could turn right over the years

... ie, a human being?

ANYONE can turn right; you just need the right set of circumstances. That's an incredibly stupid argument.

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:15 (fifteen years ago)

Using "left" and "right" to describe the weird internal dynamics of the Court doesn't help matters (e.g. Justice Stevens moving to the left)

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

rotisserie SCOTUS baseball in full swing /ptui

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

served with Breyer's ice cream

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

Speaking of baseball, that Montana judge, Sidney Thomas, who's on the 9th circuit and was supposedly being considered, goes to see Giants baseball games whenever he's in San Francisco doing 9th circuit work.

x-post
Last night the Too-Big-To-Fail amendment, a strong proposal put forward by Delaware’s Ted Kaufman and Ohio’s Sherrod Brown, got pulverized in a late-night vote. An amazing 27 Democrats voted against the bill, which would have put hard caps on the size and risk profiles of financial companies.

One of my Virginia Democratic Senators, Mark Warner, voted against that amendment (and against an earlier in committee amendment by Bernie Sanders that would have done the same thing). I e-mailed him and complained. In newspaper articles he insists that we just need strong regulation and that it does not matter how big some financial companies get. I do not agree. I think we need both.

curmudgeon, Friday, 7 May 2010 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

Wait, Dan, racial politics aside, when has Obama ever come across as hardcore anything? He very well might pick Kagan because he agrees with her. I think, in this case, that a Constitutional Law scholar and teacher may feel more loyalty to an approach or to a broad judicial philosophy than to any particular results. I have nothing against that either. There's little that depresses me more than people who know exactly how they want any one case decided with no thought for the judgment's ramifications and precedent making.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:26 (fifteen years ago)

Plus, he was very clear, early on, that he wanted someone to replace Stevens who could be the same kind of consensus builder he's been. I rather doubt that Wood would (hic) be such a Justice.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

Wait, Dan, racial politics aside, when has Obama ever come across as hardcore anything?

... this is my entire point; people on the left angrily screaming "WHAT THE HELL, OBAMA???? WHY AREN'T YOU GOING PROGRESSIVE??????" aren't doing so on the basis of anything in Obama's actual record, they are doing so because he is black and they are assuming black people, particularly Democrats, are progressive

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:30 (fifteen years ago)

tbf Obama does say things, on occasion, that are clearly meant to pander to the lib/progressive Dem base

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:30 (fifteen years ago)

but yeah his record is not super-progressive

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

I tend to agree though impe, black folks are progressive on some issues and conservative on others and hardly monolithic, etc.. I'm just saying that, rousing speeches aside, dude is cool, reasonable, process oriented and hardly hard left by anyone's standards. In Europe, Obama would be a center-right politician in many countries.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

wow this is fascinating

http://people-press.org/report/?pageid=949

― goole, Thursday, May 6, 2010 12:15 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

^^ essential reading!! the whole "black radical" bs that gets thrown around with, well, any black Democrat, now that i think about it, obscures the truth, which is that African Americans are more strongly represented in the more conservative parts of the D coalition.

but apparently being strongly against racism as an absolute baseline of belief is enough to make one a radical, these days, to right wingers...

goole, Friday, 7 May 2010 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

Tea partiers can call him a socialist tell they're red, white and blue in the face but his policies and positions, even in the post-'89 era of reformed socialist parties, are generally to their right.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

I hate to revive ancient history but the one thing the CPUSA was always right about was racism and the Civil Rights struggle got tarred by the right for being a bunch of Commies when all they wanted was simple dignity and for the 14th amendment to be applied.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:36 (fifteen years ago)

people on the left angrily screaming "WHAT THE HELL, OBAMA???? WHY AREN'T YOU GOING PROGRESSIVE??????" aren't doing so on the basis of anything in Obama's actual record, they are doing so because he is black and they are assuming black people, particularly Democrats, are progressive

lol ok waht

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

Plus, he was very clear, early on, that he wanted someone to replace Stevens who could be the same kind of consensus builder he's been. I rather doubt that Wood would (hic) be such a Justice.

But your build consensuses through opinion writing on the court - something that Kagan has ZERO experience in, and something Wood has proved to be very succesful at on the Seventh Court of Appeals (shown by her ability to sway Posner and Easterbrook).

but anyway, this whole attempt to swing Kennedy seems almost silly. Stevens found it difficult with 35 yrs of respect and a close friendship with him. It's highly unlikely that some newcomer could have that effect.

nevermind312, Friday, 7 May 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

I was about to say: Wood has plenty of experience wooing the likes of Posner.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

So this guy is now the most important man in America, apparently:

http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID32019/images/anthony_kennedy.jpg

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

larry craig?

J0rdan S., Friday, 7 May 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

As soon as a nominee has been announced, I vote we move to a new thread we create for it.

Aimless, Friday, 7 May 2010 18:54 (fifteen years ago)

Seconded.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:55 (fifteen years ago)

people on the left angrily screaming "WHAT THE HELL, OBAMA???? WHY AREN'T YOU GOING PROGRESSIVE??????" aren't doing so on the basis of anything in Obama's actual record, they are doing so because he is black and they are assuming black people, particularly Democrats, are progressive

Kinda feel like they are doing so because every ring winger in the world is constantly screaming that he's a liberal progressive, and the mainstream media is willfully perpetuating -- in varying degrees -- this narrative, at the very least by taking such accusations seriously.

There are plenty of publicly visible black conservatives and have been for a long enough time now...

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 7 May 2010 18:56 (fifteen years ago)

http://ricktrotter.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/clarence-thomas.jpg

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

he's a cornhuskers fan too. weird cat, clarence.

goole, Friday, 7 May 2010 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

also a cornholers fan

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 7 May 2010 19:01 (fifteen years ago)

If you have a truly liberal agenda and you voted for the 1 of 2 officially designated parties in this country and this party is getting portrayed as for being what you want policy-wise -- even though they are in reality centrist and even ring wing in many instances -- wouldn't you be screaming "WTH,O????" in favor of your own political stance?

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 7 May 2010 19:02 (fifteen years ago)

No, because I do my homework before voting for people rather than assuming that people I strongly disagree with are wrong about everything except where their opponents lie on the political spectrum.

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

Not a fan of the two party system?

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 7 May 2010 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

Not particularly, no.

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 19:10 (fifteen years ago)

who IS a fan other than their employees?

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 19:10 (fifteen years ago)

Everyone who votes for R or D?

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 7 May 2010 19:15 (fifteen years ago)

okay seriously, how old are you

most people vote Republican or Democrat because those are the only viable options; the coalitions within both of those parties and their ties to corporate power structure makes most of their platforms incoherent and contradictory

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

Everyone who votes for R or D?

I dropped my party affiliation years ago!

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

I never had one! So there!

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 19:19 (fifteen years ago)

I'm 28 how old are you?

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 7 May 2010 19:22 (fifteen years ago)

37. I only ask because you sound like an 28-year-old just learning about politics.

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

lol at typos

I meant 18 but whatever.

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

can we take a time out from american voting process 101 and talk about the crazy lives of right wing pundits?? i had no idea about this

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/corrections/niall-ferguson-and-ayaan-hirsi-ali-1909439.html

In an article (8 February 2010) we said that Niall Ferguson had left his wife for Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Since publication their lawyers have asked us to point out that Mr Ferguson’s marriage had broken down and he had moved out of the marital home before he met Ms Ali. We are happy to do so.

i suppose finding ferguson shacking up with ali funny says more about me than anything...

goole, Friday, 7 May 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

Like Dan, unsurprisingly, I never joined a political party or listed a party affiliation. Always felt unnecessary.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 7 May 2010 19:28 (fifteen years ago)

Yes I am just learning about politics, and I hope to never stop learning. Plus being raised in under-funded public schools in the south, I probably am on an 18-year old level of political cognizance ;-)

You make a good point about doing your homework before voting, tho. Except with a 24-hour news cycle political climate of infinite polling we encourage political discourse to be dominated by the loudest faction. Hence all the "America doesn't want this!" rather than simply letting elected officials do what they were elected to do.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 7 May 2010 19:30 (fifteen years ago)

In my own lolyoungpolitico farragoes, I wrote in my dad for President in 1992 because I really had no desire to vote for Bush I or Clinton. (Clinton's first term and the financial prosperity that followed, particularly for my industry, was enough to get me to vote for his second term.)

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

When i was 19 I voted for Nader.

Adam Bruneau, Friday, 7 May 2010 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

for those who don't already know, dan's dad is ross perot

iatee, Friday, 7 May 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

okay no (but ha)

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

Just as Republicans suceeded in pressuring Bush on judicial nominees, I wish Dems could have that success with Obama. Plus, while I knew that when I voted for Obama that he might not prove to be progressive that does not mean that as a Democrat I should not push for Democraticic progressive values or be disappointed when Obama fails to embrace some of them. I was naively hoping that the "Change you can believe in" would encompass judicial nominations though realistically I knew that like Clinton, Obama might not want to go very far to the left.

curmudgeon, Friday, 7 May 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

my secret shame: i sat out of the 2000 election. i had just moved and was busy (read: preoccupied) and didn't get registered on time. i was all "eh, Bush, Gore whatever" $#$%*$#$ Whatever?! WHATEVER?!? GOD DAMN! idiot.

sure, Gore (embarrassingly) wasn't going to carry TN, so my shameful shirking of civic duty had about 0 impact. still.

confederacy-themed bumper sticker enthusiast (will), Friday, 7 May 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

Except with a 24-hour news cycle political climate of infinite polling we encourage political discourse to be dominated by the loudest faction.

The best decision you will ever make: do not watch cable news.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

Not a fan of the two party system?

Actually, I will go on record (to the disapointment of the Clegg and the Lib Dems, and third parties everywhere) to say that there is a certain stability in first-past-the-post, two party systems that is the sometimes the envy of countries with strong regional and third (and fourth, etc..., parties.

You may call me cynical but I have rather limited expectations from politics and I fear fuck-ups more than I hope for radical reforms.

Il suffit de ne pas l'envier (Michael White), Friday, 7 May 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

LOLLLL that Niall Ferguson is an asshole but news of the affair led to one of the funniest things ever: friend's FB page had a thread on it discussing the intricacies hooking up under a fatwa and S. Rushdie popped up on the discussion saying *he* never had any problems.

sharia twain (suzy), Friday, 7 May 2010 19:49 (fifteen years ago)

the "smoothing out" regional balancing and coalition-building and rough interest-group business is just an inevitable fact of politics. in a two party system like ours, it all happens within the parties (so pre-electorally, in a way), in parliamentary systems it happens after the elections during government formation. there are trade offs either way, but it happens as a natural fact.

the problems are whether the two party system we have is disallowing movements or widely-held opinions that would have a broad constituency under some other arrangement. i'm not convinced that's true.

xp loooool

goole, Friday, 7 May 2010 19:50 (fifteen years ago)

more like hotwa, dyougetme

goole, Friday, 7 May 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

otm

iatee, Friday, 7 May 2010 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

i like the two party system!! more like I LIKE TO PARTY system!!!

max, Friday, 7 May 2010 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

to talk about unrepresented opinions a little more, the idea has been batted around for a couple days by a lot of people, mostly w/r/t a truly dumbshit column by Mark Penn about the coming centrist firestorm of Nick Clegg.

there's a fantasy that there is a huge bloc of sorta-socially-liberal, mostly-fiscally-conservative people in the US, and it's just not true.

a bloc that IS really underserved are the fiscally-liberal and socially-conservative people, though right-wing populism kinda has champions in Huckabee, and some of the tea party rhetoric, when it isn't confused.

http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/05/07/mark_penn_moron_nick_clegg

As Jon Chait pointed out, these hordes of socially liberal, fiscally conservative independent voters are entirely the fantasies of the Washington elite, which is largely made up of wealthy, educated people who do hold those rare views. (Basically the vast majority of these moderate pundits are old-fashioned New England Republicans. And D.C. must have more libertarians per capita than a Rush concert.) A shitload more Americans, in fact, would love to break up the banks and soak the rich and and get free healthcare from the government. But they're uncomfortable with gay marriage.

goole, Friday, 7 May 2010 20:28 (fifteen years ago)

socially-liberal, mostly-fiscally-conservative people in the US

they had a name for these people - Rockefeller Republicans - and most of them are dead (like my grandfather)

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 7 May 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

i'm more fiscally moderate i guess, but that kinda describes me

stupidfruityswagaliciousexpialidocious (m bison), Friday, 7 May 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

that pretty much describes my dad, tbh

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 20:31 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, it's true when fake-ass bitches like david broder piss and moan about huge numbers of americans being turned off by the the "extremism" of both the established parties, but they are exactly wrong about which way (most of) these people fall on which issues and what they want

xps

goole, Friday, 7 May 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

these days those people are called 'democrats'

iatee, Friday, 7 May 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

And D.C. must have more libertarians per capita than a Rush concert

props to pareene btw

goole, Friday, 7 May 2010 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

i really have to ask you guys to take a look at that pew survey one more time. mindblowing!! you'll never believe another pundit again.

goole, Friday, 7 May 2010 20:33 (fifteen years ago)

yeah well believing pundits is what gave us Sarah Palin

it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, 7 May 2010 20:33 (fifteen years ago)

there's a fantasy that there is a huge bloc of sorta-socially-liberal, mostly-fiscally-conservative people in the US, and it's just not true.

this is one of the worst, most persistent fantasies among american political pundits--and its why you get idiot columns about how bloomberg/mort zuckerman/rich technocrat X should run for president/senate/governor every goddamn week

max, Friday, 7 May 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

and you know im sure it describes mr. perry and m bison but thats not really enough people to get michael bloomberg in the white house

max, Friday, 7 May 2010 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

harold ford was the latest iteration of that phenomenon

max, Friday, 7 May 2010 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

that pretty much describes my dad, tbh

― it means "EMOTIONAL"! (HI DERE), Friday, May 7, 2010 3:31 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

yup

rapping about space and shit, floatin’ around in an orgy of screen savers (gbx), Friday, 7 May 2010 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

fuck bloomberg tho

stupidfruityswagaliciousexpialidocious (m bison), Friday, 7 May 2010 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

michael bloomberg could possibly get into the white house if he ran as a democrat.

iatee, Friday, 7 May 2010 20:37 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=fantasy_league_politics

great article about it

max, Friday, 7 May 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

i think the fantasy is some kind of bourgeois contempt for politics itself (and thus basically right-wing, to my marxist-soaked college mind) "man i hate it when people disagree!! if only someone was here to just MAKE THINGS WORK!! like a businessman!!"

it's like they just want to be able to come to the END of politics once and for all, rather than seeing rights-based democracy for what it is -- a forum for endless argument about everything, while excluding political violence

goole, Friday, 7 May 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

First, the confusion and contradictions exhibited by Ford are no accident. The independence movement melds populism of both the left and right varieties (see Lou Dobbs, author of the 2007 book Independents Day), centrism, and technocratic anti-politics into one messy soup. Concern about long-term budget deficits and slipping U.S. economic superiority, plus tax cuts, are usually mainstays of the movement's vague platforms. The mere idea of being somehow different from whatever is on offer in current politics seems to be "unity" enough. Independents share not a vision of where to take the country but an analysis of its politics.

Second, most of the people involved in these efforts aren't independent at all but deeply embedded in the political system as candidates or consultants. (McCain and Lieberman are lifelong politicians; among Ford's several titles is chair of the centrist Democratic Leadership Council.) They never suffer for lack of funds. And the most gullible audience for their efforts consists of the most practiced purveyors of conventional wisdom, like Washington Post columnist David Broder, who swooned over Unity08. Often it seems like the independents' primary complaint about the state of American politics is simply that they're not the ones running it.

But the independents never have to face up to these contradictions because of the third fact about these efforts -- they almost never amount to anything. Bloomberg, who's spent more than a quarter of a billion dollars of his fortune on his three campaigns, is the exception, but even after almost a decade, he hasn't been able to extend his technocratic project beyond the city or into the future. Because the independence projects fade so fast, the idea never quite goes away. It's always available as an imaginary alternative to the actual political choices before us.

max, Friday, 7 May 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

i think the fantasy is some kind of bourgeois contempt for politics itself (and thus basically right-wing, to my marxist-soaked college mind) "man i hate it when people disagree!! if only someone was here to just MAKE THINGS WORK!! like a businessman!!"

it's like they just want to be able to come to the END of politics once and for all, rather than seeing rights-based democracy for what it is -- a forum for endless argument about everything, while excluding political violence

― goole, Friday, May 7, 2010 4:38 PM (18 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i have no evidence for this really but i tend to think its a product of being 'washington insiders'--you are buddy buddy with so many people from so many different political backgrounds that you begin to think like 'hey were all buds here, why are we still arguing about politics?? this is all just a mistake'

max, Friday, 7 May 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)

btw speaking of classic pareene posts about this shitheel fantasy

http://gawker.com/5507347/the-worst-column-in-the-worst-opinion-section-in-the-world-today

Useless Old Man Fed Up With Useless Old Legislative Body
By David S. Broder
Thursday, April 1, 2010

Congress is broken. Partisanship is bad. Partisans are bad. Whatever you think of the thing that this column is ostensibly about, about which I will offer no actual opinion or analysis, you have to agree that it is bad when politicians act like politicians.

Democrats tell me one thing. Republicans tell me another thing. Which one of them is right? The answer is that they are both bad because they cannot come together to tell me one thing.

Old people in Florida feel like the legislation will just help "other people" and not them, and while that might make it sound like they are old and selfish and probably racist, I will interpret it in an exceedingly generous way while also not pointing out that they're just wrong because they were lied to by one specific group of partisans that I will not hold responsible for poisoning the discourse. Because old people are Regular Americans whose wisdom is always better than the wisdom of partisans. Even when they're wrong and hate poor people.

Then I will write "This is not a selfish country," after two paragraphs about how people were opposed to this legislation because they thought it involved helping poor or black people or something, using their money.

I have apparently no knowledge whatsoever of what the bill that I am writing about does or what it contains. I just know what I hear from partisans and old people and I faithfully report that partisans are bad and old people are good.

Blah blah politics as usual congress is terrible blah blah blah.

max, Friday, 7 May 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha could go in that shit that looks like the onion thread

stupidfruityswagaliciousexpialidocious (m bison), Friday, 7 May 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

right, it's a view of politics that ends up being way too personality-driven and ignores the vast constituencies that those people are (purportedly) representing. who gives a shit if john kerry and orrin hatch can shoot the shit amiably and not get into a fistfight when you're in the room with them -- boston liberals and utah conservatives can't! that's the point of the whole fucking enterprise!!

xps, classic

goole, Friday, 7 May 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

i think the fantasy is some kind of bourgeois contempt for politics itself (and thus basically right-wing, to my marxist-soaked college mind) "man i hate it when people disagree!! if only someone was here to just MAKE THINGS WORK!! like a businessman!!"

it's like they just want to be able to come to the END of politics once and for all, rather than seeing rights-based democracy for what it is -- a forum for endless argument about everything, while excluding political violence

― goole, Friday, May 7, 2010 3:38 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

huh, never considered this, tbh. because i'll cop to maybe being that guy, i guess?? like, what infuriates me about a lot of politics is how ~irrational~ it all is. spending on wars is ok, but universal health insurance and fucking trains is rong??? some of my beef with the right is founded in deeply held beliefs about Right and Wrong, but tbh 85% of my beef with both parties is the fact that they're both so stupid

rapping about space and shit, floatin’ around in an orgy of screen savers (gbx), Friday, 7 May 2010 20:47 (fifteen years ago)

100% truth-bomb this trailer has opened my eyes

o.b.a.m. nude

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 7 May 2010 21:15 (fifteen years ago)

better yet

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEqVcZyqsC8&feature=player_embedded#!

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 7 May 2010 21:15 (fifteen years ago)

I literally do not have enough face to palm.

― HI DERE, Friday, April 23, 2010 1:49 PM (2 weeks ago) Bookmark

goole, Friday, 7 May 2010 21:19 (fifteen years ago)

WHOA DID THEY DISS OCCIDENTAL IN THAT BITCH

max, Friday, 7 May 2010 21:21 (fifteen years ago)

yes they did they slay all the sacred cows that's why it is a truth-bomb

Daniel, Esq., Friday, 7 May 2010 21:26 (fifteen years ago)

today's Dems are Rockefeller Republicans (at best)

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 May 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

what were yesterday's dems?

goole, Friday, 7 May 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

it's rockefeller republicans all the way down

rapping about space and shit, floatin’ around in an orgy of screen savers (gbx), Friday, 7 May 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

what were yesterday's dems?

Dead.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 May 2010 21:55 (fifteen years ago)

and the day before yesterday?

goole, Friday, 7 May 2010 21:55 (fifteen years ago)

ladies and gentlemen, KEN DEL VECCHIO!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0216016/bio

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 8 May 2010 17:15 (fifteen years ago)

Trivia

Is a lawyer.

Is the Author of the New Jersey Code of Criminal Justice

Chairman of the Hoboken International Film Festival (formerly the New Jersey Interational Film & Screenplay Festival).

Has an IQ of genius level.

max, Saturday, 8 May 2010 17:16 (fifteen years ago)

Selling more books than John Grisham did in his first novel release

goole, Saturday, 8 May 2010 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

http://image.xyface.com/image/t/movie-the-drum-beats-twice/the-drum-beats-twice-97921.jpg

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 8 May 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)

Lots of anti-Kagan articles to link:

Jonathan Adler.

Four law professors attack Kagan's deanship tenure.

Paul Campos on the dangers of the blank slate.

Finally, everyone's favorite: Greenwald.

Yesterday on Twitter, Matt Yglesias supplied the rationale for this mentality: "Argument will be simple: Clinton & Obama like and trust [Kagan], and most liberals (myself included) like and trust Clinton & Obama."

Just think about what that means. If the choice is Kagan, you'll have huge numbers of Democrats and progressives running around saying, in essence: "I have no idea what Kagan thinks or believes about virtually anything, and it's quite possible she'll move the Court to the Right, but I support her nomination and think Obama made a great choice." In other words, according to Chemerinksy and Yglesias, progressives will view Obama's choice as a good one by virtue of the fact that it's Obama choice. Isn't that a pure embodiment of mindless tribalism and authoritarianism? Democrats love to mock the Right for their propensity to engage in party-line, close-minded adherence to their Leaders, but compare what conservatives did with Bush's selection of Harriet Miers to what progressives are almost certain to do with Obama's selection of someone who is, at best, an absolute blank slate.

One of the very first non-FISA posts I ever wrote that received substantial attention (uniformly favorable attention from progressives) was this post, from February, 2006, about the cult of personality that subsumed the Right during the Bush era. The central point was that conservatives supported anything and everything George Bush did, regardless of how much it comported with their alleged beliefs and convictions, because loyalty to him and their Party, along with a desire to keep Republicans in power, subordinated any actual beliefs. Even Bill Kristol -- in a 2006 New York Times article describing how Bruce Bartlett had been ex-communicated from the conservative movement for excessively criticizing George Bush -- admitted that personal allegiance to Bush outweighed conservative principles in the first term and that "Bush was the movement and the cause."

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 8 May 2010 18:47 (fifteen years ago)

Awfully false equivalence by Greenwald there. Trusting Obama to pick a good Justice is quite different from conservatives supporting decisions by Bush that they would have opposed from a Democrat. A blank slate is not the same as flipping your position on an issue.

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 8 May 2010 20:33 (fifteen years ago)

"huge numbers"

is it really that hard to spot all these fake british dudes? (velko), Saturday, 8 May 2010 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

Trusting Obama to do anything is infantile.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 8 May 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

I trust Obama to have good posture.

Trying really hard not to start a Ken Del Vecchio thread you guys

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMJCX-Ddt8g

Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 8 May 2010 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

gg otm in re: iglesias (and that terrifying iatee post yesterday); just because kagan is probably the best choice for obama and the party doesn't mean she's the best choice for like, me

sveltko (k3vin k.), Saturday, 8 May 2010 21:09 (fifteen years ago)

did you vote for kucinich in the primaries?

J0rdan S., Saturday, 8 May 2010 22:58 (fifteen years ago)

good point

sveltko (k3vin k.), Saturday, 8 May 2010 23:28 (fifteen years ago)

Bennett Ousted at Utah G.O.P. Convention

Senator Robert F. Bennett, an 18-year veteran Republican who had been seeking a fourth term this fall, was stripped of his party’s nomination on Saturday at the state convention, becoming one of the first Congressional victims of the surging ferment of discontent from the Tea Party-infused Republican right.

A lot of you have come here today with booing in your heart (Z S), Sunday, 9 May 2010 01:16 (fifteen years ago)

It really hasn't been well established that Kagan is all that great of a pick politically anyway. Maybe she'll dominate in the hearings like Sotomayor, Ginsburg etc. did, but one of the others probably would too.

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 9 May 2010 01:34 (fifteen years ago)

basically I want someone on the left about whom we can say "LOL Wood" like we can about Scalia.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 9 May 2010 02:40 (fifteen years ago)

Obama nominates zombie Brennan.

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 9 May 2010 04:26 (fifteen years ago)

If only.

Kagan, they said, has weathered criticism from conservatives and liberals. The left has criticized her defense of some of the terrorism policies of the George W. Bush administration, although her defenders point out that she was only representing the policies of the Obama administration.

One Democrat close to the process said the questions about Kagan and her lack of a record on issues liberal groups are concerned about has not hurt her.

Because of her work in the Clinton administration, one activist said, "she has a lot of powerful liberal friends in this town. She has been very effective in using her progressive allies."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/05/07/AR2010050705029.html

curmudgeon, Sunday, 9 May 2010 04:41 (fifteen years ago)

I love how every time there's a Supreme Court pick we all sit around posturing like we actually pay attention to circuit courts and judges and what qualities and experience are relevant, like we can divine the meaning behind quantity or quality of legal writing etc.

Not to say all of this discussion is lol pointless but a whole lot of it is lol pointless

The Clegg Effect (Tracer Hand), Sunday, 9 May 2010 15:32 (fifteen years ago)

well maybe you should marry it if you love it so much

sveltko (k3vin k.), Sunday, 9 May 2010 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

x-post--Eh, speak for yourself. If some of us have read folks that are more expert that's good enough for me. Plus I sometime have to read circuit court opinions for my dayjob. So there! Also, some of the journalists writing about these judges do follow caselaw trends and some have legal backgrounds.

curmudgeon, Monday, 10 May 2010 00:54 (fifteen years ago)

Some of us are pretty good at "reading comprehension," Tracer; and we can read legal prose.

cool and remote like dancing girls (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 10 May 2010 01:00 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/36967616/ns/politics-supreme_court/

kagan.

goole, Monday, 10 May 2010 02:31 (fifteen years ago)

of course

sveltko (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 May 2010 02:51 (fifteen years ago)

http://i40.tinypic.com/oa6m8w.gif

A lot of you have come here today with booing in your heart (Z S), Monday, 10 May 2010 02:56 (fifteen years ago)

!!

goole, Monday, 10 May 2010 02:58 (fifteen years ago)

oh and holder wants to weaken miranda. what the fuck.

goole, Monday, 10 May 2010 03:03 (fifteen years ago)

confirmed by cnn :/

sveltko (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 May 2010 03:06 (fifteen years ago)

fml

A lot of you have come here today with booing in your heart (Z S), Monday, 10 May 2010 03:07 (fifteen years ago)

*drinks up*

sveltko (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 May 2010 03:11 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FblQR8ZeUpQ

is it really that hard to spot all these fake british dudes? (velko), Monday, 10 May 2010 03:33 (fifteen years ago)

I love how every time there's a Supreme Court pick we all sit around posturing like we actually pay attention to circuit courts and judges and what qualities and experience are relevant, like we can divine the meaning behind quantity or quality of legal writing etc.

I personally am fonder of how opinions like this get trotted out to tell people "stfu & trust people who are doubtless nobler than thee"

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, 10 May 2010 03:42 (fifteen years ago)

I keep looking for something that would make me think Kagan is a terrible nominee and can't really find one. It'd be nice to have someone who is obviously a liberal (like uh, former ACLU SG Ginsburg), but I'm not persuaded to oppose the nomination outright because she didn't hire enough minority professors at Harvard.

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 10 May 2010 04:00 (fifteen years ago)

ringing endorsement there

sveltko (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 May 2010 04:01 (fifteen years ago)

lol

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, 10 May 2010 04:04 (fifteen years ago)

that criticism is pretty weak imo

βΠψ (bnw), Monday, 10 May 2010 04:08 (fifteen years ago)

Well I understand opposing the nomination because she's a blank slate. But I kept reading these Greenwald posts, and seeing a million links in them, and when I took the time to actually read all of them it turns out that her biggest problems are that she didn't hire enough minorities at Harvard, and that she made some arguments in favor of dumb/evil Obama policies (i.e. she did her job).

Matt Armstrong, Monday, 10 May 2010 04:18 (fifteen years ago)

alright so i understand the arguments as to why kagan might be better than greenwald is making her out to be -- in fact i generally agree with them. my question is this: has anyone made a case or given a reason why diane wood should not have been picked? or why kagan should've been picked over her, aside from the huffington post article which i actually thought was good, but didn't touch at all on why kagan would be better specifically than wood, if they were the final two. would obama have any firsthand knowledge about wood that would inform his decision to pick kagan over her, or is it purely ideological?

J0rdan S., Monday, 10 May 2010 04:22 (fifteen years ago)

^^yes this is exactly it dude, no one is arguing that kagan is some kind of clarence monster, she'll probably be a reliable leftish justice for quite a long time - it's just, why the fuck support someone who we're unsure about and have reason to believe might be kinda conservative on executive powers when wood is so unequivocal in her views and her judicial record is so easy to parse. seriously that opinion of hers gg linked to a few weeks ago is so amazing and inspiring. and at the risk of regurgitating his talking points, it'd be different if she were replacing, like, scalia - then there would be less reason to oppose her. but why take a chance on her replacing just about the only reliable liberal on the court when there is someone else who is supremely qualified who literally poses no risk of shifting the balance to the right?

sveltko (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 May 2010 04:29 (fifteen years ago)

*clarence thomas-type monster......i am not on a first name basis with the dude

sveltko (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 May 2010 04:29 (fifteen years ago)

a pube-first basis

J0rdan S., Monday, 10 May 2010 04:31 (fifteen years ago)

ugh son

jagger edge (The Reverend), Monday, 10 May 2010 04:31 (fifteen years ago)

http://thedailyvoice.com/voice/images/clarence_thomas2.jpg

J0rdan S., Monday, 10 May 2010 04:34 (fifteen years ago)

it's hard telling. accounts from the sotomayor pick make it seem like the interview was a big part of it, obama and sotomayor clicked on some i'm sure very important jurisprudential level and that was that.

xps

goole, Monday, 10 May 2010 04:36 (fifteen years ago)

when wood is so unequivocal in her views and her judicial record is so easy to parse.

the senate being what it is, maybe this is the problem.

goole, Monday, 10 May 2010 04:38 (fifteen years ago)

i guess obama will make a statement regarding this tomorrow?

J0rdan S., Monday, 10 May 2010 04:39 (fifteen years ago)

i mean i'm not gonna act like it doesn't make perfect sense or whatever - of course obama is gonna pick someone who's gonna have his back on executive powers stuff! dude is doing tons of foreign policy ish that hardcore liberals aren't cool w/ - why would he pick someone like wood, who has very clearly defined views in the area and would almost certainly oppose certain extra-judicial decisions just about any white house would want to make, when he can pick some careerist hack like kagan who would be more sympathetic in that area but still win over 90% of libs - she's pro-choice, phew! she's probably gay and sure showed those mean army recruiters that one time!

sveltko (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 May 2010 04:39 (fifteen years ago)

i guess obama will make a statement regarding this tomorrow?

― J0rdan S., Monday, May 10, 2010 12:39 AM (14 seconds ago)

yeha as of an hour ago cnn was saying 10ish

sveltko (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 May 2010 04:40 (fifteen years ago)

clarence monster

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, 10 May 2010 04:42 (fifteen years ago)

it will be interesting to see if he echoes the sentiments of that huffpo article re her abilities wrt persuasion

J0rdan S., Monday, 10 May 2010 04:43 (fifteen years ago)

some careerist hack like kagan

easy bro, it's not like she started a tumblr about hipsters or something

goole, Monday, 10 May 2010 04:44 (fifteen years ago)

she's pro-choice, phew! she's probably gay and sure showed those mean army recruiters that one time!

― sveltko (k3vin k.), Sunday, May 9, 2010 11:39 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

let's not scoff at this

J0rdan S., Monday, 10 May 2010 04:45 (fifteen years ago)

dogg the point is any fucking obama pick is going to be pro-choice and pro-gay, bfd

sveltko (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 May 2010 04:45 (fifteen years ago)

yo could u link that huffpo article you're referring to?

sveltko (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 May 2010 04:46 (fifteen years ago)

new thread imo btw

sveltko (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 May 2010 04:46 (fifteen years ago)

that obama is really picking kagan over wood because he just wants extra executive power is a pretty retarded suggestion - we have a far right-wing supreme court either way.

iatee, Monday, 10 May 2010 04:47 (fifteen years ago)

i would start the thread but the pressure of coming up with a good title is too much for me

anyway, this is the huffpo column about kagan -- it's not gonna do anything to pacify people already against her nomination, but it does make some interesting points, both about the court as a whole and about kagan

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lawrence-lessig/a-case-for-kagan_b_551511.html

J0rdan S., Monday, 10 May 2010 04:52 (fifteen years ago)

funny cuz this far-right court you're talking about has ruled 5-4 (stevens in the majority) a few times against executive powers in the past few years

xp

sveltko (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 May 2010 04:57 (fifteen years ago)

that you can honestly believe that obama would make a decision like this as some furtive executive power grab is just so lol

iatee, Monday, 10 May 2010 05:04 (fifteen years ago)

but I guess you believe that he's an evil dude and that's how evil dudes operate I guess

iatee, Monday, 10 May 2010 05:06 (fifteen years ago)

yeah it's not like he reconsidered his stance on FISA or the FOIA act or anything, he's a solid guy without any of the usual trappings of power - his immunity to its allure is kind of singular n'est-pas

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, 10 May 2010 05:08 (fifteen years ago)

yeah dogg i read that article a while ago, it basically doesn't say anything other than "trust me, i know her and she's gonna be great". the whole thing about her being able to sway conservatives based on the fact that she hired some white dudes at harvard is some wishful thinking BS imho - it's actually the opposite of what we want, which is someone who can make conservatives see it our way, rather than meeting them halfway, which is the best we can say about hiring a bunch of conservatives. what is the point of forging consensus with conervatives if the consensus isn't on our side?

sveltko (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 May 2010 05:09 (fifteen years ago)

so you want compromises where the other side suddenly agrees with you 100%

iatee, Monday, 10 May 2010 05:10 (fifteen years ago)

alright i bit the bullet US POLITICS: underrated supreme court decisions that i have read

J0rdan S., Monday, 10 May 2010 05:11 (fifteen years ago)

what is the point of forging consensus with conservatives

well I mean I think the point of forging consensus w/conservatives is that one actually agrees with them generally about most stuff, if we're being honest

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Monday, 10 May 2010 05:12 (fifteen years ago)

i mean that entire artice iirc goes on about how awesome kagan is without describing a single view she holds, other than that she's a "progressive". alright, if you say so, lawrence lessig.

xp no you retard, i don't want compromises at all. i want someone who has a record as being on the right side, and persuading conservatives to agree with her view of the case, rather than meeting them halfway - something wood has a record of doing, and kagan we're just praying for

sveltko (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 May 2010 05:13 (fifteen years ago)

and yeah i realize nine times outta ten wood and thomas may have the same view on a case - it's the close ones we're worried about

sveltko (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 May 2010 05:15 (fifteen years ago)

we can lock this now

sveltko (k3vin k.), Monday, 10 May 2010 05:16 (fifteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.