Cheating -- partner in crime to blame too?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

I had an interesting argument today, on Facebook of all places, on a topic that people tend to get passionate about. The scenario described by the original poster was a woman who was single who had relations with a male who was happily spoken for, and knew it prior to cavorting with him. I must point out that the gender of the person really matters not here, it just seemed to be an IRL example that the poster was describing.

One gentleman adamantly argued that the woman in this scenario is not at any fault at all, that it is not her responsibility to respect the relationship between the cheating male and his woman, that it was solely the responsibility of the cheating male. I argued that while the cheating man in that scenario was clearly in the wrong, that in a situation where the woman knew that he was in a relationship, she should not have interfered with him, and that it was "wrong" to damage the relationship. I also chimed in with the opinion that in infidelity, often times it is the "single" person who initiates the romance.

I realize this is not a black and white issue in the least, but it had me thinking. I certainly didn't budge from my opinion, but if it were the other way around (the spoken-for person initiating the romance with the single person) I could see being more sympathetic. I tend to view cheaters and their accomplices as scum for the most part.

What are your opinions on the scenario above? And please, be civil to each other

If You Ain't Gonna Wash It, I Ain't Gonna Eat It (Cattle Grind), Monday, 26 April 2010 22:44 (sixteen years ago)

both parties are disgusting savages imho

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 22:48 (sixteen years ago)

yeah i dont see how anyone could make an argument in favor of blamelessness of either party.

Q: What's brown and Sticky? A: The insect that lives in your stomach (jjjusten), Monday, 26 April 2010 22:49 (sixteen years ago)

^^

everything said above, and wasn't this already a question elsewhere?

mh, Monday, 26 April 2010 22:50 (sixteen years ago)

xpost I try to stay out of such arguments but given the likely age of said dude, I'm willing to bet his opinion may have been based on the fact that he's had relationships with "taken" women before.

Of course, his response was more eloquent than the next guy who said "face it, all women are whores". :/.

If You Ain't Gonna Wash It, I Ain't Gonna Eat It (Cattle Grind), Monday, 26 April 2010 22:51 (sixteen years ago)

I don't think you're quite being judgemental enough. I tend to view both parties as a river of human effluent. 'Scum' is too good for them.

Matt DC, Monday, 26 April 2010 22:52 (sixteen years ago)

I'm having a hard time seeing how the single woman could be innocent in this, if she knows that the man is married, she's equally complicit. Assuming the woman didn't initiate the relationship (where she is obviously responsible), there's the old romanticized notion that the husband is dragging along the single woman with promises of leaving his wife - and I'm sure that still happens with naive women, and sometimes the men do follow through - but she's still a good deal accountable; how does she get off the hook for disrespecting the wife's marriage? I'm under the impression that single people are generally expected to honor other people's marriages - both cheating parties are bad, as everyone is saying.

Nhex, Monday, 26 April 2010 22:54 (sixteen years ago)

some ppl think they don't owe strangers any moral consideration - had this argument w/a sociopath on another forum recently who took this tack vehemently. wtf does he care about the feelings of some third party dude if he's getting his rocks off, ws his stance o_O

cozen, Monday, 26 April 2010 22:55 (sixteen years ago)

where I come from we have a word for ppl like this tho: cunts

cozen, Monday, 26 April 2010 22:56 (sixteen years ago)

wtf does he care about the feelings of some third party dude if he's getting his rocks off

lol this is like the ne plus ultra of jerky behavior

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 22:57 (sixteen years ago)

just like anytime I talk about a girl I find interesting and someone will say "you should ask her out" and I'll go "well she has a boyfriend/she's married" and they'll go "so?"

o_O. alls I know is, dudes hit on my last g/f and asked her out behind my back, but if any one of them had succeeded, I'd have fucked him up until his face looked like Daffy Duck's with his beak turned backwards....

If You Ain't Gonna Wash It, I Ain't Gonna Eat It (Cattle Grind), Monday, 26 April 2010 22:59 (sixteen years ago)

it's that aggressive streak that made them think she might say yes in the first place, in their heads in your head i mean.

mdskltr (blueski), Monday, 26 April 2010 23:04 (sixteen years ago)

and how badly would you have beaten your last g/f, just out of curiosity

lol xp

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 23:05 (sixteen years ago)

o_O. alls I know is, dudes hit on my last g/f and asked her out behind my back, but if any one of them had succeeded, I'd have fucked him up until his face looked like Daffy Duck's with his beak turned backwards....

Surprised you've never been tempted yourself, you must be a hit with the ladies.

Matt DC, Monday, 26 April 2010 23:06 (sixteen years ago)

seriously in that scenario you'd be wiser to reserve your ire for your g/f and break up with her, since she betrayed you. no beatings necessary. while the guys hitting on her were jerks, it was her complicity that really hurt you, not their attempts.

xp

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 23:06 (sixteen years ago)

Seems like a basic bro code thing that you shouldn't even hit on the same girl that your buddy's going after, let alone one that he's already dating. Don't know if I could dispute a justified punch in the face.

Nhex, Monday, 26 April 2010 23:09 (sixteen years ago)

yeah i am all down with the tactics of non-violence and whatever, but punching a dude for knowingly sleeping with your S.O. hardly seems like some sort of barbaric insanity yall.

Q: What's brown and Sticky? A: The insect that lives in your stomach (jjjusten), Monday, 26 April 2010 23:14 (sixteen years ago)

I dunno - it happened to me and no punching was involved. years later I am still friends with bro (shit, now our KIDS are friends) and bitch is to the curb.

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 26 April 2010 23:17 (sixteen years ago)

lol this was a theoretical beatdown in a theoretical scenario and IRL I'd probably just do something chickenshit like put sugar in his gastank. my post was dripping with hyperbole. I haven't even as much as shoved someone in ten years :)

and yea of course I'd break up with her, I'm not one of those people that would blame it all on the other guy. course it doesn't matter now cuz I'm single anyway...

If You Ain't Gonna Wash It, I Ain't Gonna Eat It (Cattle Grind), Monday, 26 April 2010 23:19 (sixteen years ago)

I realize this is not a black and white issue in the leas

u fuckin kiddin me?

hobbes, Monday, 26 April 2010 23:28 (sixteen years ago)

well obviously I'm on YOUR side on this one...

If You Ain't Gonna Wash It, I Ain't Gonna Eat It (Cattle Grind), Monday, 26 April 2010 23:32 (sixteen years ago)

The girl should just not go there, if she knows he's taken.

Someone just did this to me, and I think they are BOTH fucknuts.

Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 00:19 (sixteen years ago)

I'm sorry Trayce :(

If You Ain't Gonna Wash It, I Ain't Gonna Eat It (Cattle Grind), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 00:21 (sixteen years ago)

Obviously it seems worse behaviour on the part of the spoken-for guy, as he's betraying someone he supposedly loves whereas the other party is interfering with a stranger's life.

That's what I tell myself, anyway...

Not the real Village People, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 01:07 (sixteen years ago)

I am now an ecstatically engaged dude, so i feel ok about weighing in on this because i feel like i am distanced from whatever hurt occurred at the end of my last relationship (which in retrospect was pretty shitty at the end, whether i realized it or not), but in retrospect i still hold other dude as the more culpable offender. Also, in the interest of full disclosure re: earlier discussion of violent reaction, i made my position clear enough that he left the state, which was prob best for both of us. Not proud of that, but realistically, love mixed with betrayal brings out the worst in people.

Q: What's brown and Sticky? A: The insect that lives in your stomach (jjjusten), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:03 (sixteen years ago)

I realize this is not a black and white issue in the least

u fuckin kiddin me?

― hobbes, Monday, April 26, 2010 7:28 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

Uhhhh it's actually not a black and white issue. This sort of shit is incredibly complicated, nobody is perfect and emotions are sometimes extremely unpredictable and uncontrollable. Unless you all are complete saints then you are v v harsh and prone to condemn ppl in situations when you may not know even a small portion of the whole story.

Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:09 (sixteen years ago)

Aye, I'm sad to say E is right, as much as I'd like it to be otherwise :(

It is easy for me to be rabidly furious at both the girl who has basically come in and cut my lunch, AND my (now ex) partner of almost 3 years. He didnt say no, she (apparently) didnt care, I lost.

But then I think back a few years and realise I did exactly the same thing to someone else :/ So um. Yeah.

Karma is a bitch, yo.

Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:15 (sixteen years ago)

I said what I did as someone who has both been cheated on and cheated on partners and can say that none of those situations were black and white. I also don't think that ppl are naturally monogamous. I think that monogamy is a choice and a very very difficult one at that. People are flawed and sometimes shit happens. Sometimes that shit can be worked through and sometimes it can't.

Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:17 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah :( TBH in my case I wish my guy had come and spoken to me about it before this all blew up how it did (ie before he'd even met anyone else he had his eye on). We could have worked something more ... flexible out. But he isn't a talker.

TALK TO YOUR PARTNER. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE TALK TO THEM I CANNOT STRESS HOW IMPORTANT THIS IS.

Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:20 (sixteen years ago)

said move was prompted by phone conversation where i told him that the next time i saw him he was going to end up in the hospital and i was going to end up in jail, and i was dead serious*

*note - dude was my roommate/close friend during the tail end of this (2 months, jerk), and bailed on his rent and abandoned enough shit that it cost me $1000 to get rid of it by vanishing like a thief in the night the day before i got the news from my ex via voicemail. so yeah, no regrets really.

xxpost: ehhh all respect yall, but i think that the fact that we all might have been shitheads doesnt change the fact that uh we were shitheads? and yeah, if you are fairly active in this realm (ahem) the sad truth is that you are prob going to cheat on both sides, which sucks, but its true. i am def not pronouncing from on high on this issue. ive been on both sides of this, and i feel pretty fucking ashamed of that. getting totally pwned by it just makes that more acute.

like tons of xposts and whatever i cant keep count at this point

xpost again: yeah, ENBB, i see where youre coming from there (obv), but issues of monogamy dont remove the answer to the original question, which is yes, if you engage in cheating on either side, yer a dick. i have been a dick several times. doesnt make it more right.

Q: What's brown and Sticky? A: The insect that lives in your stomach (jjjusten), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:25 (sixteen years ago)

No, of course it doesn't but I guess that in general I think ppl are prone to be dicks.

I mean I won't get too into personal stories here so I'll share one of a friend who had been with her partner for 10 years and married for 2. The marriage was not happy and she met someone at work who made her happy. They didn't actually cheat but did ~emotionally~ and maybe kissed once. She left her husband and has now been with the other dude for three years and is completely happy. Did she go about it the right way? No, of course not. Was it a shitty thing to do? Yes, of course it was but she was miserable and would have made her husband miserable in the long run had she stayed so in some ways what happened was for the best.

Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:29 (sixteen years ago)

Former husband also in a great relationship now btw.

Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:32 (sixteen years ago)

See E, my ex could perhaps say exactly the same thing about why he just did what he did.

Problem is I had no idea anything was wrong :( We were happy!

Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:37 (sixteen years ago)

Aaand i shd stop talking about my personal life on a public thread now heh ooops.

Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:37 (sixteen years ago)

I don't know. I am not saying that cheating is OK. I've just noticed that ppl on ILX seem v v quick to judge and that ime these things are often extremely complex. I mean, when I was in college I dated someone for 4 years. I had transferred schools and was booked on a train to go visit my best friend at the old school the next day when I found out one night that she'd hooked up with my boyfriend on numerous occasions. I freaked out and drank myself into a stupor but got on that train the next morning and rode 7 hours to visit her. We spoke about it for about 2 hours and that was pretty much that. They were assholes for making out but sometimes ppl are assholes and we were young and drunk and in the end her friendship and his love meant more to me than a couple of dumb french kisses and boobie touches. Maybe I was dumb for thinking that way but it made sense at the time.

Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:38 (sixteen years ago)

x-post - Yeah Trayce, I know and maybe that's why the importance of communication is a whole other issue entirely. I mean in regards to the couple I was talking about before, the dude was totally blindsided. Apparently the wife had been miserable for a cpl years but if you talk to him - it came out of left field. Sigh. I don't know. I don't claim to have any answers at all. I just think it's important to realize that ppl are fallible beings and that love/lust are extremely powerful emotions and that sometimes ppl get hurt and . . . i don't know. Btw Trayce I'm so sorry you're going through what you are and I know it's extremely painful. Not, by any means, trying to make light of that. hugs.

Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:41 (sixteen years ago)

drunken french kisses are not some dude penetrating your wife iirc

Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:41 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah I dont ascribe to the "if they cheat on you even once BAM GAME OVER NO RETURN". I'm willing to forgive, as long as trust or at least communication and openness can be worked on.

I am, alas, an intensely jealous person sometimes though.

Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:41 (sixteen years ago)

Whiney: ah funny you say that I was also about to say "and ppl define cheating in diff ways".

IMO even sexyflirting online with someone is cheating, if you are doing it with intent/your heart in it.

A drunk kiss that *honestly meant nothing and will continue not to* is a greyer area - its still shitty tho.

Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:42 (sixteen years ago)

yeah but as a dude who has been a cheater (jerk), and was never (afaik, probably lucky ignorance) on the other end of that until the aforementioned (prob well deserved) comeuppance, im not really willing to justify my shitty behaviour because the feeling on the other end is pretty awful. kind of glad that i got that sort of wake up call, because at this point i understand that the step before cheating is owning up to being unhappy with what you have, which might suck in the short run, but is better than creating more misery for the person you are with.

uh prob many xposts there but i am tired

Q: What's brown and Sticky? A: The insect that lives in your stomach (jjjusten), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:42 (sixteen years ago)

drunken french kisses are not some dude penetrating your wife iirc

― Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, April 27, 2010 2:41 AM (21 seconds ago) Bookmark

No, of course not but when it actually comes down to it one can lead to the other quite quickly and they aren't all that much different in the end.

Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:43 (sixteen years ago)

You can't just sit there and do nothing but stew when you find out you've been played. Person who cheats with your partner is not entitled to any courtesy; it's very rare for a third party to be unaware that they are a third party (and it is much easier to be mean to that person than it is to be mean to your misbehaving partner). I've run a mile from attached men who put moves on me precisely because I *never* want to be that person and I'm very much inclined to believe that anyone who is attracted to that scenario is deluded and fucked-up, mainly because they've given permission for their new partner to cheat on them in the exact same manner (which is what usually happens).

Back in the days before internet dating etc, there was a woman who was very interested in my then-boyfriend. Nothing happened between them, but not for want of trying on her part. My revenge was well-crafted: I signed her up for Dateline (British 'computerised matchmaking' of the '80s/'90s) and the contact number I gave for her went straight to her very gossipy assistant, who screamed rather than screened the call. To get the same effect today you'd have to ship a large dildo to your rival's workplace with a 'thought you might need this' note of some kind.

yes we kenya (suzy), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:44 (sixteen years ago)

drunken french kisses are not some dude penetrating your wife iirc

― Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, April 27, 2010 2:41 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

also, by that i mean al shipley taking your wife back for a night of tender lovemaking to baltimore club mixtapes

Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:45 (sixteen years ago)

it's very rare for a third party to be unaware that they are a third party (and it is much easier to be mean to that person than it is to be mean to your misbehaving partner).

I am SO RELEIVED to read another female say this. Most of my friends have been saying "don't be so hard on E, its not like this is her fault, she was single, and so is he now, so you know". HE IS SINGLE BECAUSE YOU SNOGGED HIM, MADE HIM FEEL GREAT AND HE LEFT ME FOR YOU. JUST SAY NO.

Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:46 (sixteen years ago)

lollllllll

Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:47 (sixteen years ago)

OMG SORRY THAT WAS A X-POST

Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:48 (sixteen years ago)

Hahaha its ok :)

Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:49 (sixteen years ago)

btw, part of my take on this is that however bad i may have been during lust/emotodraw/whatever decision making, i can be a paragon of virtue when it comes to the fact that i have never ever ever pursued an involved woman. and as established, i'm a dick when it comes to this sort of stuff, but that is a bridge too far.

Q: What's brown and Sticky? A: The insect that lives in your stomach (jjjusten), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:50 (sixteen years ago)

And T I'm not trying to excuse her actions at all but, as you said, you know what it's like to be on the other side and sometimes if the emotions are there and the person says the right things, you aren't always thinking about what the other person involved might feel. It's totally shitty but it's also life.

Also as someone who has worked in sexual health I firmly believe that most ppl cheat. Statistics put it at like 50% but that's what ppl answer when asked which is inherently flawed because ppl won't always answer truthfully.

BTW I am totally playing devil's advocate here. I do believe it's possible to be completely monogamous for years but I also think that it's very difficult and, in most situations, a rare occurrence.

Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:52 (sixteen years ago)

Trayce, your friends must think being single is some kind of mysterious ailment that robs you of both your agency and the obligation to respect other women. I got in a huge internet fight about this subject once, because I suggested a woman who *admitted* she got off on being the third party in some guy's life was no better than a spunkbucket.

yes we kenya (suzy), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:53 (sixteen years ago)

kinda feeling like mr philosophy degree here, but the actuality of frequency of cheating has like nothing to do with the morality of cheating. even less so when we are talking about the 3rd party immunity scenario.

Q: What's brown and Sticky? A: The insect that lives in your stomach (jjjusten), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:59 (sixteen years ago)

Man, I hope you don't think I'm saying that ppl aren't obligated to exhibit some self-control because that's not what I'm getting at. I'm just saying that occasionally thing happen that are beyond self control and ppls heats get broken and it really sucks but that's what happens because we're fallible being and prone to some impulses beyond our control.

I should shut up. It's just that I've been reading these cheating threads and everyone is all "THESE PPL ARE ALL ASSHOLES" and I'm not sure that that is a fair statement of character in all cases.

Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:59 (sixteen years ago)

~morality~

Mr. Philosophy degree that could be another thread entirely.

Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 07:00 (sixteen years ago)

well yeah, but that is what this whole thread is about, right? on a base level, the question is whther a third party is RONG if they engage in this , which in almost every moral code = yes? not arguing that it doesnt happen, frequently, but its still uh, wrong.

Q: What's brown and Sticky? A: The insect that lives in your stomach (jjjusten), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 07:04 (sixteen years ago)

OK yes, it is wrong. I guess I would just say that ppl do a lot of things thtat are wrong. I don't know. I WASN'T A PHILOSOPHY MJR LEAVE ME ALONE!!! ;p Could I also be using my argument justify some actions? Of course. However, I think I'm a pretty OK person and yet I know that I haven't always behaved what others would consider "perfectly".

Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 07:07 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah for my part I should point out that in most cases I dont believe people set out to do this on purpose and break hearts on purpose! I've only known one person who *was* like that, and he was very abusive in a lot of other ways too, but he was a sociopath.

Mostimes, shit happens.

Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 07:11 (sixteen years ago)

to be clear as a dude who has uh "dated" a lot of people (braggin 1990-2009), and has had way more moments of infidelity than i would like to admit, im not saying that we all need to live in a SHADOW OF SHAME, but i think that we can all feel ok about ourselves while still knowing that when we cheat, we are dicks. helping other people along with cheating = still a dick, imo. sometimes more so.

Q: What's brown and Sticky? A: The insect that lives in your stomach (jjjusten), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 07:13 (sixteen years ago)

OK yes

btw can I just say

PUPPY IS RESTING HIS HEAD ON SIDE OF LAPTOP AND MY <3 MIGHT EXPLODE.

Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 07:16 (sixteen years ago)

puppies never cheat

Q: What's brown and Sticky? A: The insect that lives in your stomach (jjjusten), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 07:17 (sixteen years ago)

my little big buddy suffered through his getting his first gentle leader experience this evening. he did not like it.

now he is loving on me, so all is ok.

Q: What's brown and Sticky? A: The insect that lives in your stomach (jjjusten), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 07:19 (sixteen years ago)

dogs are the best people, and all that.

Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 07:19 (sixteen years ago)

oh wait what were we talking about?

Q: What's brown and Sticky? A: The insect that lives in your stomach (jjjusten), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 07:19 (sixteen years ago)

OMG they are so great. They love you no matter what. I am sad though because I have to chop off his balls soon.

Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 07:22 (sixteen years ago)

My cat was most unimpressed when I had her ladybits removed.

Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 07:24 (sixteen years ago)

henry has at least 1 year left w/ his balls (big dog gets to keep them until growing is over). unless he gets to be a breeder, in which case all hope is lost.

Q: What's brown and Sticky? A: The insect that lives in your stomach (jjjusten), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 07:26 (sixteen years ago)

(dogball xposts) True, but once they know there's someone else involved their behaviour ceases to become an accident of circumstance.

I'm probably very hardline on this due to issues with a former 'best friend' who basically hit on *all* the partners I'd had in my life to that point, until she found the needledick in the haystack who was willing to fuck her (he thought he was having a magnificent time until he realized he was maybe sixth on her list). She is now making a career for herself as a very vocal feminist, but it's nice to see she compartmentalizes her work and her personal life so well.

yes we kenya (suzy), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 07:28 (sixteen years ago)

dude this little pug is perfect looking - he could be a breeder. idk - i feel bad taking them off but that's what you're supposed to do, right?

so ahhh cheating, eh? ;p

Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 07:29 (sixteen years ago)

said move was prompted by phone conversation where i told him that the next time i saw him he was going to end up in the hospital and i was going to end up in jail, and i was dead serious*

don henley was schemin on yr ex? at least he got a song out of it

Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 08:15 (sixteen years ago)

huh?

Q: What's brown and Sticky? A: The insect that lives in your stomach (jjjusten), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 08:57 (sixteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Somebody's_Going_to_Emergency,_Somebody's_Going_to_Jail

Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 09:21 (sixteen years ago)

i feel bad taking them off but that's what you're supposed to do, right?

you've inadvertently stumbled on the solution for all the pissin and moanin that's going on itt!

Oh boy, sleep! That's where I'm a ILXing! (dyao), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 14:49 (sixteen years ago)

anyway from another perspective I felt relieved when I found out that my ex was going out on paid-for dates with guys as it gave me a way out. I'm pretty sure she wasn't actually snogging any of them but it still let me take the moral highground (which I actually do feel guilty for doing).

Oh boy, sleep! That's where I'm a ILXing! (dyao), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 14:55 (sixteen years ago)

Unless you all are complete saints then you are v v harsh and prone to condemn ppl in situations when you may not know even a small portion of the whole story.

this is basically my story

goole, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:07 (sixteen years ago)

The real blame is with the cheater, in the sense that the cheated-on partner needs to direct their anger at their own spouse and not the "temptress" (if the "other woman" is a woman). But I can't help feeling like I could really lose respect for anyone who would BE the third party with a married person -- indicates a character deficiency, imo. So sue me, I'm judgmental.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:11 (sixteen years ago)

I say this because I have sort of BEEN the third person, not seriously but emotional closeness is sort of cheating too...more of a grey area, yes, but if it would hurt the unknowing spouse, and their partner KNOWS that it would, and does it anyway, I think there's culpability.

But I'm ashamed that I ever allowed myself to do that, and I knew I was being weak and building myself up at others' expense. Once you're an adult, you're supposed to have had some experience at stuff like this, and therefore to know better.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:14 (sixteen years ago)

if there is a car wreck, who is at fault? the first person, or the other person?

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:15 (sixteen years ago)

if two people invent cold fusion, which one deserves credit? new answers please

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:16 (sixteen years ago)

relationships are really complicated and human beings are awful to themselves and to others

max, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:20 (sixteen years ago)

Acknowledging this sad truth would make this thread less interesting though.

Throwing Muses are reuniting for my next orgasm! (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:21 (sixteen years ago)

my spouse has been traveling for work almost 100% of the last year. we have a great relationship and I had been counting the days until this work contract was over and we would be together again...then i met someone at a party, had a really nice time and couldn't stop thinking about them. ran into them again a week later, turns out the feeling was mutual and we fucked. i'm still thinking about the other person constantly, and having panic attacks about my next move. my spouse has done nothing to deserve this and the last thing i want to do is hurt them.

i've had a few friends that i was pretty harsh to when i found out that they left their spouses for other people. thought i was too good and my relationship too solid to fall into that. i think a lot of people think cheating is a very deliberate thing, but i wasn't looking to cheat. i just wish i knew what to do next.

all this being said, i think i am more to blame than my new partner.

logged*out, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:22 (sixteen years ago)

PUPPY IS RESTING HIS HEAD ON SIDE OF LAPTOP AND MY <3 MIGHT EXPLODE.

― Aqua Backrat (ENBB), Tuesday, April 27, 2010 3:16 AM (8 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

why arent you putting sunglasses on him and sending pictures to me?!

Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:22 (sixteen years ago)

But I can't help feeling like I could really lose respect for anyone who would BE the third party with a married person -- indicates a character deficiency, imo

Wouldn't go that far, personally, although if you regularly seek out married (or attached) people or actively pursue someone fully versed in their attachment then there's something wrong somewhere.

But really, all politics is local and sometimes shit does just happen.

snakebite and a passable pinot noir (Upt0eleven), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:26 (sixteen years ago)

the one who's at fault is... the one who's at fault.

think about it.

goole, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:28 (sixteen years ago)

dude

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:28 (sixteen years ago)

If the two committed partners examine either one's reasons for cheating, they might decide that the blame is shared b/c of conditions in the relationship that either/both have allowed to develop; I'm not blind to the fact that the cheating partner might NOT deserve all the blame if circumstances are extremely strained.

But from an outside view the one that took action is more to blame, agreed on that.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:30 (sixteen years ago)

actually, the third party is always blameless in this circumstance: if the cheater is a beautiful woman who is about to marry a generic upper-middle-class cocksure jerk in a romantic comedy featuring owen wilson and/or ben stiller

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:32 (sixteen years ago)

Beta-male fantasy not being massaged in those comedies at all, no sir.

yes we kenya (suzy), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:35 (sixteen years ago)

when did ppl start calling the prostate the "beta-male fantasy"

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:36 (sixteen years ago)

this exact moment

goole, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:37 (sixteen years ago)

ok cool

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:37 (sixteen years ago)

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ^^^he's here all week!

yes we kenya (suzy), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:37 (sixteen years ago)

It doesn't matter if the third person is a stranger. The one in the relationship who cheated is at fault definitely but why would the 3rd party need to concern themselves with specifics when all they want is some lovin? Sometimes the disgusting savage cheater is cool letting the 3rd person believe they are free. Is that the 3rd person's fault? I think not.

I walked in on my ex doing it with someone else while we were still together and I really did not care at all what happened to the girl, who she was etc. All I wanted was to never see the bf again and that has worked out fine for me. The beef was with the bf because the bf and I were supposed to be in a committed relationship. I had no connection to the girl and she had no connection to me.

If I knew her? oooooooo different story (probably not that different, I'm not too violent or angry).

peacocks, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:53 (sixteen years ago)

why would the 3rd party need to concern themselves with specifics when all they want is some lovin?

yeah yeah relationships r complicated n shit, but this is kinda sociopathic

Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 15:56 (sixteen years ago)

ENBB OTM, totally rolling my eyes at some of the absolute moral judgements being made here. Sometimes the person who's being cheated on is being cheated on because they're a complete dick to their partner. Sometimes they're a complete innocent. There's a world of grey in there.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:01 (sixteen years ago)

i dunno matt, "details" is not the same thing as "grey"

goole, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:02 (sixteen years ago)

peacocks' post raises an interesting point: there can be diff between who is "to blame" and who one party actually feels like blaming (though that first category is entirely compromised too, by the sympathies of the parties' friends/greek chorus etc)

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:05 (sixteen years ago)

sociopathic? haha, maybe. But some people are like that. What good does it do me to get stressed over it, is what I'm saying. The responsibility lies with the people in the relationship. I'm also talking about random hook ups at bars and stuff. I am not talking about friends or acquaintences who are aware of the status of the individual and actively seek out romantic situations with that person.

peacocks, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:06 (sixteen years ago)

Can I point out that these absolute moral judgments are being made in the context of a specific scenario, namely:

The scenario described by the original poster was a woman who was single who had relations with a male who was happily spoken for, and knew it prior to cavorting with him. I must point out that the gender of the person really matters not here, it just seemed to be an IRL example that the poster was describing.

Bringing "but what if the person getting cheated on is a tool" to the table kind is kind of an obtuse extrapolation here, given what we know of the situation being commented on; the assumption is that the person getting cheated on isn't a tool, otherwise the person who did the cheating wouldn't be "happily spoken for".

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:07 (sixteen years ago)

peacocks' post raises an interesting point: there can be diff between who is "to blame" and who one party actually feels like blaming (though that first category is entirely compromised too, by the sympathies of the parties' friends/greek chorus etc)

the only thing that matters is the opinion and feelings of the party being cheated. People in relationships define what is ok and what is not within that relationship. This does not include crazy stuff like physical abuse or controlling situations, those are never ok.

peacocks, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:10 (sixteen years ago)

"controlling situations" covers a fair range of human behaviour

Norway, that's where I'm a viking! (history mayne), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:13 (sixteen years ago)

Kind of depends on how much the 3rd party knows about the relationship - if they're a stranger the guy might have said they were about to separate, it was a loveless marriage, whatever. Yeah they should probably take that with a pinch of salt but if the cheater is misrepresenting his situation then the blame would lie more with him.
If it's a friend of the couple though, that's v scummy.

Not the real Village People, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:16 (sixteen years ago)

getting involved with someone who is in the middle of some other situation is just bad policy. how is this not perfectly clear.

goole, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:19 (sixteen years ago)

I met my current bf while he was still unhappily married. He was honest and told me up front, and I promptly ignored his invitations to call him, and never responded to the one msg he sent me after that.

We re-met two years later when we were both free, and I'm glad it happened this way. I knew I didn't want to bear any culpability for ending a marriage, even if it was already in flames and even if he was being the honorable partner, or any other possible conditions. Call me old-fashioned (altho if that were true, I wouldn't be dating/potentially marrying a divorced person!) but that was too morally questionable to me -- plus who wants a partner who's fleeing from something worse? I'm glad he came back to me with all his faculties and his feelings being his own and not belonging to any other woman.

wasting time and money trying to change the weather (Laurel), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:22 (sixteen years ago)

i think we can all agree that people should be excellent to each other

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:26 (sixteen years ago)

goole otm

the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:28 (sixteen years ago)

if the cheater is a beautiful woman who is about to marry a generic upper-middle-class cocksure jerk in a romantic comedy featuring owen wilson and/or ben stiller

in this case the cheater is even more stupid than usual tbh

obv enbb way otm upthread - things are complex, end - but from the specific perspective of the one being cheated on, it comes off as a bit "avoiding the issue" if they direct their anger at the 3rd party. the 3rd party may or may not have been a dick, but the cheater was a dick to you: look to that first.

لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:44 (sixteen years ago)

honestly i think the cheater is only really being a dick to YOU if they fess up to you about it

:o

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:48 (sixteen years ago)

or they give you an STD

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:48 (sixteen years ago)

or a bastard child

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:48 (sixteen years ago)

or while you're blowing them they say "you could take a few tips from cheryl imo"

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:50 (sixteen years ago)

I think that counts as "fessing up"

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:50 (sixteen years ago)

and messing up

Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:51 (sixteen years ago)

or a bastard child

This just made me choke on my tea and cough for almost a minute, and it's not even that funny. Thanks, Dan.

Walter Melon (Abbott), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 16:52 (sixteen years ago)

i think we can all agree that people should be excellent to each other

peacocks, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:37 (sixteen years ago)

no, I disagree; people should stab each other with guns

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:39 (sixteen years ago)

metaphorically

Marriage, that's where I'm a Viking! (HI DERE), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:39 (sixteen years ago)

what? sorry i wasn't paying attention, too busy paying it forward tbh

Shakey Ja Mocha (M@tt He1ges0n), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:40 (sixteen years ago)

We re-met two years later when we were both free, and I'm glad it happened this way. I knew I didn't want to bear any culpability for ending a marriage, even if it was already in flames and even if he was being the honorable partner, or any other possible conditions.

See, this is what I wish my guy had done. We'd spoken a little while back about his.. well, not feeling so comfy with settling down at this point in his life (he's 26, but apparently thats still "a kid", fffff i dunno and you'd think 2 years living together you'd settle into it! anyway). When he met Other Person who I do actually know and is good friends with a lot of my friends (which is making all this INCREDIBLY TOXIC), they should have both just gone "ok hands off FOR NOW" - he sorts out his shit with me, then whatever.

Dumping me, waiting ONE DAY til I AM INTERSTATE then proceeding is NOT COOL.

OK got that off my chest, nuff said.

Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Tuesday, 27 April 2010 21:52 (sixteen years ago)

i think we can all agree that people should be excellent to each other

Let us heed the words of Wyld Stallyns

Nhex, Tuesday, 27 April 2010 22:02 (sixteen years ago)

the whole 'but if the person who cheated is in relationship with someone who is awful to them' only holds so much water: if you don't like the relationship you're in and you want to pursue another, why wouldn't you end the current relationship first?

jjjjusten v v otm in this thread.

just1n3, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 00:23 (sixteen years ago)

the other thing too is that the cheating partner is the only one who knows both sides of the story - i've known of several friends who've been duped by the whole 'but i get treated so badly at home' thing, so that the partner in crime feels bad for them and wants to rescue them from their supposedly horrible situation.

just1n3, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 00:37 (sixteen years ago)

yeah, this can be very complicated and i'm sympathetic but ultimately the unhappy person in a relationship who is tempted to stray should end the relationship before hooking up with the third party. if the person you are about to cheat on ever meant anything to you, you owe them that much, even if they have been a less-than-great partner.

velko, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 00:41 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah, I mean there is ZERO a person can do if they meet someone new and that person indicates theyre single, but are lying about it. Thank fuck that's never happened to me. But if I met someone who said "well I am with X but things are bad/on the way out/we're separated" I'd just back off. I have enough drama in my life already, who needs that shit.

This is where dating ppl ive been friends with a long time has been helpful - I know what their life situ is!

The thought of now meeting and dating strangers makes me feel ill.

Eyjafjallalalalalatrolololol (Trayce), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 00:42 (sixteen years ago)

of course, a cheater often does not want to end their current relationship, not completely, but not dealing with the issues in the long-term relationship and just letting the infidelity play out is selfish and immature.

velko, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 00:46 (sixteen years ago)

whoa, this like...exploded. but I like the viewpoints being discussed.

Never did find out what prompted the friend to post that (I'm guessing one of her friends had it happen to her), but ya kinda have to think to yourself that knowingly hooking up with a taken person is likely going to lead you to get your ass beat months down the line, and may sabotage someone elses relationship beyond repair. and well if you have no conscience, well then think about the assbeating.

I say this as someone who has a hard time resisting temptation, but I know in my last relationship, when things were good, yea I saw other attractive women and yea sometimes I got attention from them, but I was only interested in my girl. there wasn't even any "grass is greener" moments. which is why it sucks that it went south :/.

If You Ain't Gonna Wash It, I Ain't Gonna Eat It (Cattle Grind), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 02:13 (sixteen years ago)

also Trayce, re: communication....co-signed. I say this as a guy who didn't do a great job of it in my last relationship, but I was the one who got blindsided with the breakup. It sucks to be broken up with when you see it coming, but it's worse when it comes when you think things are dandy.

If You Ain't Gonna Wash It, I Ain't Gonna Eat It (Cattle Grind), Wednesday, 28 April 2010 02:14 (sixteen years ago)

I have enough drama in my life already, who needs that shit.

haha fidelity through laziness!

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:22 (sixteen years ago)

amen to that!

Nhex, Wednesday, 28 April 2010 09:30 (sixteen years ago)

ten months pass...

both parties are disgusting savages imho

― the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, April 26, 2010 10:48 PM (10 months ago) Bookmark

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

ugh

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

ehhh "disgusting savages" is kind of pushing it
I mean people have affairs *all the time*. it sucks but what are you going to do?

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

not have affairs

max, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

lol

that type of response will never not be funny

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

frogbs otm

going into life automatically means that sometimes terrible things are going to happen to you, and you are going to sometimes end up doing terrible things to others. obv that fact doesn't give one a free pass to shit all over people, but i think esp. in the realm of relationships, where even the wisest among us seem to be pretty clumsy and encounter some serious stumbling blocks now and again, i think it's difficult to condemn people for being...human. and confused.

you can't get out of life without causing pain and grief to people and fucking up hugely sometimes. it's just not possible.

dell (del), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 18:54 (fifteen years ago)

In that case, better to do it by accident rather than... knowingly. Big moral difference there.

anna sui generis (suzy), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

xp - it's pretty easy to condemn them when you're the one who got fucked over!

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I mean there was this really interesting letter I read from an NBA player (who was anonymous, obviously), explaining that the temptation to cheat is so great that it's nearly impossible to resist. a lot of people will say they would never do it and may honestly believe that in their heart, but I would think they might change their mind if they had supermodel types throwing themselves at them on a consistant basis. Obviously that's an extreme example but I would think those who take the moral high road on this - like "I'm happily married and very satisfied, and if you're not then you need to work on your marriage, cheaters are disgusting, etc." probably have never really experienced the temptations. like, sure, you don't go to seek it out, but how many times have you turned out other women/men who are willing to start something regardless of your status and keep it discreet??

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:11 (fifteen years ago)

the person who's single is not as bad...especially if they don't know the significant other.

Ask Nult What Your Country Can Do For You (Local Garda), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:12 (fifteen years ago)

so it's okay to knowingly fuck up the life of someone you don't know?

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:13 (fifteen years ago)

not always that simple, the person could be a total asshole, or cheating themselves.

Ask Nult What Your Country Can Do For You (Local Garda), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

who says you're fucking it up?

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:15 (fifteen years ago)

i think the key, in the case that the temptation is "irresistible" and something you're repeatedly exposed to (or know in general about yourself) then maybe monogamous relationships aren't for you and you should be up-front with your partner about that. it's not that hard to do the right thing here.

ryan, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

xp - the key word is "cheating" - it's a betrayal of trust and a demonstration of a lack of respect.

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I mean there was this really interesting letter I read from an NBA player (who was anonymous, obviously), explaining that the temptation to cheat is so great that it's nearly impossible to resist.

Roger Daltrey: "We lived together for four years before Heather decided that she'd like to have children. I wanted to do the right thing again by marrying her, but at the same time I still felt that I had so much more living to do. So I was honest and said, 'Look, I'm in a rock band, I've got loads of other girlfriends and I'm not going to give any of them up. If you can put up with that, I'll happily get married.' Incredibly, she said yes." They've been married for 40 years.

Tarfumes The Escape Goat, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

in some relationships there's already no trust or respect, or none left

Ask Nult What Your Country Can Do For You (Local Garda), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

"I'm happily married and very satisfied, and if you're not then you need to work on your marriage"

I'm not saying this hypothetical person needs to work on their marriage, I'm saying they need to work on THEMSELVES.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

^^^this

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxpostsIn that case, better to do it by accident rather than... knowingly. Big moral difference there.

i agree

xp - it's pretty easy to condemn them when you're the one who got fucked over!

yeah, i don't mean that i think people shouldn't be called out for it or the injured party(s) shouldn't complain or whatever.

i am just speaking from having been on both sides of the proverbial coin. it sucks all the way around, to be sure..but my point in part is that i think even people with the best of intentions sometimes fuck up all around in spite of themselves, and even the most idyllic-seeming of relationships sometimes implode, almost without warning. so i was trying to second frogbs's comment. unless one is in a given relationship, it's difficult to fully appreciate the dynamics that are going on, and maybe too easy to pass judgment on people for not ending the relationship legalistically first, or however decent people are supposed to go about things...

and also it's cliche and all, but, it's life. everyone is flawed.

dell (del), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

dell otm and I think what he said is pretty similar to what I tired to say when this thread happened last year

why the revive shakes? just curious.

ENBB, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:25 (fifteen years ago)

i am just speaking from having been on both sides of the proverbial coin. it sucks all the way around,

same here! And I think it's perfectly okay to pass judgment and condemn people whose actions make your life suck.

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

I would think they might change their mind if they had supermodel types throwing themselves at them on a consistant basis.

may very well be completely accurate! But a person who knows that cheating is a temptation that is out there and knows that they need to keep their vow not to do it better be examining his or her situation on the reg and maybe deciding that they shouldn't BE around supermodel types if that's what it takes.

People don't NOT cheat because it's easy to be good and honest and stuff. They they think about it beforehand to make the actual saying-no part easier or less frequent.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

if you're willing to ruin your life and the lives of others because temptation is "irresistable" = you meet the dictionary definition of a disgusting savage. civilization is about social cohesion, ie understanding and respecting the rights of others and acknowledging your commonality, and about developing institutions that stand the test of time. But if you are a slave to your physical desires to the extent that you have no foresight or empathy, you are a disgusting savage.

xp

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

why the revive shakes? just curious.

trials and tribulations of a friend who shall remain nameless kinda weighing on my mind and making me angry

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:28 (fifteen years ago)

Fair enough. Figured something like that.

ENBB, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:29 (fifteen years ago)

People don't NOT cheat because it's easy to be good and honest and stuff. They they think about it beforehand to make the actual saying-no part easier or less frequent.

^^^this

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:29 (fifteen years ago)

i think the key, in the case that the temptation is "irresistible" and something you're repeatedly exposed to (or know in general about yourself) then maybe monogamous relationships aren't for you and you should be up-front with your partner about that. it's not that hard to do the right thing here.

I agree, but nothing is really cut and dry. I had a friend who got married young, had two kids, and kept in good shape, while his wife gained like 80 pounds and lost pretty much all interest in sex..."twice a year, maybe" is what he told me. Women were chasing him all the time so really I don't blame him one bit for acting on it (which he did), of course he wanted to keep his family together and do right by his kids so he didn't tell anyone (they divorced a few years ago so maybe she finally found out)...all that said, yes this guy is definitely being shady but in a way I really couldn't blame him for what he did. If that makes me a shitty person so be it.

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, that is kind of shitty

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

I haven't been through it myself, but I've been close to people who have and my feeling is if you're seeing temptation at every corner then get out of the relationship you're in instead of running around on the person you're with thinking they won't find out. Doing it and then apologising is still shitty, at least in my mind.

but I'm pretty black and white on that, I understand there's grey. I don't say any of this passing judgement on people who've been in that situation, on cheaters or cheatees or whatever, I'm not calling anyone out as a disgusting savage...that's just where I sit on the matter.

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

on the one hand it's true that I do not have supermodels throwing themselves at me. on the rare occasion that I have been hit on over the course of my current relationship/marriage I've been more surprised than anything else. But I find the very idea of completely fucking over my wife and ruining my life (divorce, moving out, splitting custody, etc.) just for the sake of some blowjobs or whatever completely bizarre. like, it's just blowjobs, they aren't THAT important. it seems totally childish/juvenile to value sex that highly to me. Like if you need that much casual sex that badly, you have other, probably fairly deep-rooted problems (about self-esteem, about addictive behavior, whatever)

xp

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

xp - how well did you know his wife?

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

But if you are a slave to your physical desires to the extent that you have no foresight or empathy, you are a disgusting savage.

well to be fair i think that hugely ignores the fact that so many people "cheat" for reasons that are not primarily based on physical desire?

dell (del), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

I had a friend who got married young, had two kids, and kept in good shape, while his wife gained like 80 pounds and lost pretty much all interest in sex..."

moral of the story: don't marry young

xp - how well did you know his wife?

up to now I would've thought pretty well, friends for 15+ years, I was at their wedding, our kids play together, etc. after this... man, I just don't know.

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

well, there has to be some physical desire involved, otherwise the act wouldn't take place

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

well to be fair i think that hugely ignores the fact that so many people "cheat" for reasons that are not primarily based on physical desire?

well yeah I was just speaking to the "supermodels are throwing themselves at me!" scenario

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

xp - oh, that question was for frogbs!

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

lol sorry

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

I've said too much!

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, I mean, that's true but conversations like this always seem so pointless because I think there are huge difference in regards to motivations and actions in each situation. Like are we talking about people who carry on years long affairs completely behind their otherwise happy partner's back or someone who meets someone else and truly falls in love unexpectedly before ending their current situation or someone taking what started as innocent flirting just that much to far? To me these are all vastly different scenarios which is one of the reasons I think making blanket statements and condemnations against then people involved is so tricky. In an ideal world made up of perfect people then I think what SMC is saying would be OTM but the world is nowhere near ideal and most people I've come across are pretty far from perfect.

ENBB, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

want me to modzap that response shakey?

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:39 (fifteen years ago)

well to be fair i think that hugely ignores the fact that so many people "cheat" for reasons that are not primarily based on physical desire?

Agreed, dell. What I thought but didn't post because it was tl;dr is that anyone who's THAT tempted to cheat needs to think honestly about what desire/weakness is being fulfilled by the attention from another person and/or the sex itself. Maybe there's a real void in their lives that needs to be filled and they need to be honest w their partner about how to fill it, or maybe the affair satisfies a need for attention or excitement or reassurance or some other weakness/vice that maybe is better off being battled as a separate issue because it's bad for them in other ways, too...

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:39 (fifteen years ago)

oh the first part of that was a x-post

also "just blowjobs, they aren't THAT important" is sort of ignoring the fact that for a lot of people who do find themselves in any one of the above situations, it's about a lot more than just sex

ENBB, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:40 (fifteen years ago)

no, that actually is a good example of what i was thinking -- the closer you are to the relationship (with the closest being actual one of the people involved), the more horrible it generally feels. The further removed you are, it is easier to say "people are flawed. oh well." rather than "disgusting savages!"

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

want me to modzap that response shakey?

eh nah, doesn't matter I imagine

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

due to sheer ignorance, I was once "the other guy." once I figured it out I was pretty pissed and broke it off immediately. we only hung out for a few weeks while her bf (whom i never met) was traveling. it sucked bc I liked her a lot and was v attracted to her, but I was young, had an active social life and figured I had other stuff to do. now that I'm boring and old I wonder if i might be a little more hesitant to end it so self-righteously and abruptly :-/

the Hogg who would be Boss (will), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

if you're willing to ruin your life and the lives of others

this is really overstating it; my parents divorced when I was 5 and it sucked but I think I lived a pretty normal childhood (btw the divorce had nothing to do with cheating). my mom has been cheated on twice by different men she's been with and obviously she was hurt by it but now she's remarried and happier than ever. moving out and splitting custody sucks too but it happens to a ton of people like, all the time. most of 'em seem to do fine.

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:42 (fifteen years ago)

(as opposed to trying to officially woo her away or w/e)

the Hogg who would be Boss (will), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:42 (fifteen years ago)

like, it's just blowjobs, they aren't THAT important. it seems totally childish/juvenile to value sex that highly to me.

I don't know if you've heard but sex is pretty much the basis of our society; obviously if you're married your view changes but think of what our world would be like if sexual attraction didn't exist and people only did it for procreation.

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:44 (fifteen years ago)

geez, i meet far too many guys that seem to have problems with women due to their parents' divorce issues.

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:44 (fifteen years ago)

...or their divorce issues.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

xp - oh, that question was for frogbs!

Not too well, she didn't really like me or any of his friends, the impression I got from her is that she wasn't very social or active.

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

do you think that made it easier for you to feel like your friend was blameless?

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

I agree, but nothing is really cut and dry. I had a friend who got married young, had two kids, and kept in good shape, while his wife gained like 80 pounds and lost pretty much all interest in sex..."twice a year, maybe" is what he told me. Women were chasing him all the time so really I don't blame him one bit for acting on it (which he did), of course he wanted to keep his family together and do right by his kids so he didn't tell anyone (they divorced a few years ago so maybe she finally found out)...all that said, yes this guy is definitely being shady but in a way I really couldn't blame him for what he did. If that makes me a shitty person so be it.

yeah i understand this. i certainly have compassion for people in confusing and fucked up situations, while still holding myself and others accountable for doing the right thing. i dont think these two positions are totally incompatible.

ryan, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:50 (fifteen years ago)

this is really overstating it

nah. If I cheated on my wife I would be looking at divorce, finding a new home, a complete revision of my lifestyle, significantly dimmed financial prospects, raising a child under difficult circumstances, middle aged loneliness, a ton of grief from my friends and family, potentially a shortened life-span, etc. compared to what my life is now I think this counts as "ruined". and for what? some orgasms? seems stupid. no, it's worse than that, it seems self-destructive.

xp

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:50 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, my life is much improved after breaking up with the bf that cheated on me, but that doesn't mean I should thank him and the ho-bag he was fucking behind my back.

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

all this stuff about desire, needs, civilization, etc, gives me a good excuse to post this really great profile & critique of dan savage that just ran in the washington monthly

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2011/1103.dueholm.html

goole, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

xp I don't think he was blameless, obviously I know he was doing the wrong thing, my point is that I didn't really look down on him for that because I honestly believe that most guys in that situation would probably do exactly the same thing.

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

anyone who's THAT tempted to cheat needs to think honestly about what desire/weakness is being fulfilled by the attention from another person and/or the sex itself. Maybe there's a real void in their lives that needs to be filled and they need to be honest w their partner about how to fill it, or maybe the affair satisfies a need for attention or excitement or reassurance or some other weakness/vice that maybe is better off being battled as a separate issue because it's bad for them in other ways, too...

yah, well said

also, i should maybe add that i wasn't thinking of marriages, children, when i was posting up there, b/c oh gosh that is sort of a whole 'nuther thing.

and some of this talk is also maybe ignoring how it is more upsetting when stuff involves an emotional relationship as opposed to just some one night stand sort of incident.

ugh. anyway my advice is avoid relationships at all costs. at all costs... don't even make conversation with someone while in line at the bank.

dell (del), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:55 (fifteen years ago)

xp I like to think you're doing "most guys" a disservice. It helps me have hope for humanity.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:55 (fifteen years ago)

written by a lutheran pastor, no less!

savage's ethics have worked themselves around to a moral position in favor of cheating in a lot of circumstances. like, i can see the logic of frogbs' friend cheating, i can't blame him too much, if the description of that marriage is accurate.

what's the moral calculus between outright telling your wife you think she is fat and boring now, and going off to fuck someone else secretly? i guess the latter IS worse, but probably doesn't feel that way in the moment. people can go a long time without saying what they really think. BOTH courses of action threaten the safety of one's kids, which is a whole other gamble no matter what you do about your own desires...

goole, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:58 (fifteen years ago)

xps

goole, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:58 (fifteen years ago)

nah. If I cheated on my wife I would be looking at divorce, finding a new home, a complete revision of my lifestyle, significantly dimmed financial prospects, raising a child under difficult circumstances, middle aged loneliness, a ton of grief from my friends and family, potentially a shortened life-span, etc. compared to what my life is now I think this counts as "ruined". and for what? some orgasms? seems stupid. no, it's worse than that, it seems self-destructive.

yeah but most people who cheat think they won't get caught, in which case the consequence is basically nothing. also it's not like every marriage or relationship is in your situation. obviously you have a lot more incentives not to cheat. I'm kind of sensing that you don't really understand why people do it. It's not just for "some orgasms", there's a lot more to it

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 19:59 (fifteen years ago)

sometimes it involves candy

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

xps - Sadly, I don't think he is.

Goole that article was sort of great. I haven't read anything he's written in years but never really liked Savage at all.

So two of my co-workers who I'm both friends with (but much closer to the girl) have been hanging out and have slept together a couple times. The girl has a live in boyfriend who she's miserable with. The guy is single. Do I think the fact that she's repeatedly hooked up with this other dude and then gone home to her bf is wrong? Yes. Have I told her that I think so and that she either needs to end it with the co-worker ASAP or break up with the boyfriend and move out? Yes. Do I think she's a disgusting savage? No. I think she's a genuinely good person who fucked up and is now more confused then she was at the start. Am I going to stop being her friend because I think what's she's doing is wrong? No. It's a shitty situation for all people involved but I don't think me being as asshole to her about it is going to help at all.

ENBB, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

xp - i don't think that's true about thinking they won't get caught, they just avoid thinking about what will happen when they do get caught.

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:01 (fifteen years ago)

what is worse cheating or war

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:01 (fifteen years ago)

i resented my father for years for cheating on my mother, but sitting down with him one day not too long ago i realized he had his legitimate reasons for doing so, my parents had been unhappy for a long time with one another...he met someone, she made him happy, end of story. I guess as someone who is now going through a tough spot in his own marriage i see his reasons more clearly now...i don't know, my mind is a jumble these days.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

I'm kind of sensing that you don't really understand why people do it. It's not just for "some orgasms", there's a lot more to it

oh I am SURE there's much more to what's currently going on, I'm just mystified as to what it is. I can speculate, but the cheater seems to be operating under several layers of denial afaict

xp

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

i still don't think i could bring myself to legitimately cheat though....and i have been tempted on more than one occassion. and i think at this point it wouldn't be in any way shape or form about sex, it would be about smiling again.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

Have I told her that I think so and that she either needs to end it with the co-worker ASAP or break up with the boyfriend and move out? Yes. Do I think she's a disgusting savage? No. I think she's a genuinely good person who fucked up and is now more confused then she was at the start. Am I going to stop being her friend because I think what's she's doing is wrong? No.

I read this in the voice of Donald Rumsfeld, fwiw

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

it would be about smiling again.

vertical smiling amirite

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

sorry

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

not so much 'some orgasms' as 'some different orgasms'

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

or feeling happy, or good about yourself...or feeling worthwhile rather than worthless to someone.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

x-post Yeah well that's pretty much what I sounds like.

ENBB, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

dan savage and don rumsfeld should have traded jobs for a while

goole, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

I don't know the girl in questions boyfriend btw. I assume if I did I might feel differently but for now I feel like I've told her what I think and that's enough.

ENBB, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

Do I think she's a disgusting savage? No. I think she's a genuinely good person who fucked up and is now more confused then she was at the start. Am I going to stop being her friend because I think what's she's doing is wrong? No. It's a shitty situation for all people involved but I don't think me being as asshole to her about it is going to help at all.

That's a good way to look at it! I struggled for a while with the fact that some of my friends remained friends w/the girl my bf cheated on me with, and also with the fact that they remained friends with him.

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

It's sort of weird when I see her and the other guy at work together but that's mostly because now I know too much and picture them doing it. :(

ENBB, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

smileys go the other way, i thought?

goole, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

ha ha

ENBB, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

XPs I know you have a bit of a crazy situation, Chris, but speaking generally if someone was in this kind of relationship (feeling worthless etc) it'd surely be better for all parties to sort out where it's going or what's best to do, *without* having some other party involved to complicate stuff even more?
Obviously kids complicate everything hugely so I guess I'm talking about where there's no kids.

Not the real Village People, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:08 (fifteen years ago)

oh agreed village people...100%.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:09 (fifteen years ago)

while his wife gained like 80 pounds and lost pretty much all interest in sex..."twice a year, maybe" is what he told me

just dropping in here to say that using this doesn't excuse anything and imo pretty repugnant to indirectly blame "the fat wife" for your cheating.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

ha i don't think that's "indirect"

goole, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

is it okay that he cheated because... he was disgusted by his wife? or what? would it have mattered if she gained 80 lbs but still put out?

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

My concern with a relationship that starts as cheating on a third party is that it is conceived as a kind of escape; self-destructive escapism NAGL in trying to live honestly - which is a worthwhile aspiration IMO.

anna sui generis (suzy), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

^^^yeah I think that's what's going on here and it's sad/upsetting/anger-making

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

I'm glad you tackled that angle, elmo. Complete agreement in all parts.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

Also, the escapist thing otm. Read a book...and then see a therapist, or whatever you need to do.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah the fat thing is BS although I'm p sure some people would say that is a person transforms so much that you're no longer physically attracted to them then that's a big issue. I don't agree with that necessarily but am just speculating about what some ppl (Frog or his friend?) might say. I guess the no sex thing is more of a "legit" issue because that is a huge component of a romantic relationship.

ENBB, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:20 (fifteen years ago)

Or if not huge then at least very important. For many people.

ENBB, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:20 (fifteen years ago)

well cheating is cheating, but, what are we to make of people that come to the realization that they are really not attracted to their partner at all anymore? i mean, if 'being happy' is at all part of a continuing reason to be in a relationship, if this source of happiness has basically disappeared, what is someone to do?

or forget what they are to do, how are we supposed to judge it here, is the important thing

xps

goole, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:21 (fifteen years ago)

it is pretty shitty though to take a bunch of depression symptoms as a reason to cheat on your spouse, tho

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

i haven't had actual sex with my wife in almost two years.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

no dan, its not a reason...but when its her telling you that you're worthless...

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

that's kind of another level...?

like, emotional abuse is also kind of shitty

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

just kind of

ENBB, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:25 (fifteen years ago)

yeah slightly huh.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

does she actually say that, or is it something you feel based on how you think she perceives you?

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

idk I guess what I'm thinking here is that in a lot of situations there might be stuff like what Chris is describing going on which just complicated things . . . a lot. In other situations people might just be complete fucking assholes but that's why I think it's dangerous to lump everyone together.

ENBB, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

putting on 80lbs as soon as you feel like you got a long term guarantee is symptomatic of a lot of things, tbf

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

she tells me that...as in "you really don't contribute to much around here". which is BULL FUCKING SHIT.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

I've totally had to say no to someone who's been interested in me as a result of NOT being interested in their partner. I've also been lied to about partners, but upon finding out, told the offending party not to bother even being friends with me, because lies involving genitals are pretty much the worst and I can't really be friends with liars anyway.

much xposts - ach, Chris - that is HORRIBLE. People who tell you about being worthless are usually projecting.

anna sui generis (suzy), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:28 (fifteen years ago)

I think that in a reltionship, you have a certain amount of responsibility as an individual to be the best person you can be for the benefit of your partner. staying healthy should be a big part of that.

i have a hot bagel waiting for me in my bed so ill say this: (kkvgz), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:28 (fifteen years ago)

idk, obviously people will change physically over time, BUT if the ONLY thing that arouses you about your committed partner is their physical appearance then maybe your attitudes about intimacy & sex are unsustainable and also fucked up? also, if this anecdotal cheater actually valued his family as much as is implied, maybe he should have tried any number of options to work on the sex problem WITHIN the relationship before going extracurricular. sorry to be throwing down so many *value judgements* but i just can't get down with this.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

if this source of happiness has basically disappeared, what is someone to do?

get a divorce. THEN find someone else. cheating isn't going to make you any happier. it's going to make everyone involved UNhappier.

xp

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

thats what i say and that doesn't go over well with her....because you know...she is AWESOME...at everything.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

christ Chris that is awful. have you guys seen a counselor?

xp

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

also elmo otm here I think

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:31 (fifteen years ago)

for whatever it's worth, I interpreted it as there being a number of issues arising from gaining 80lb which made the wife not want to have sex - rather than the dude being grossed out by it necessarily

guess it could be either or both tho

I only use this style of type when I choose it (DJ Mencap), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

No Elmo I totally fell you I was just trying to think of what other people might say. I mean, maybe the dude did try other things - we don't know the whole story. If it was just "Oh you're fat, I'm gonna get some tail elsewhere" than obv that's extremely shitty. Don't get me wrong - it's shitty regardless.

ENBB, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:33 (fifteen years ago)

Chris - does she ever say that she feels like your mother?

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:33 (fifteen years ago)

just dropping in here to say that using this doesn't excuse anything and imo pretty repugnant to indirectly blame "the fat wife" for your cheating

Yeah if you just look at it in black and white maybe. The bigger issue is that she had no interest in satisfying him sexually at all which yeah, is a big deal. Obviously there's another issue if you're just no longer attracted to your partner, obviously it's morally reprehensible but when you get to the point of "I will never have sex with anyone other than this one person who I do not find attractive" it becomes a little more than just an issue of "keep it in your pants bro"

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

there's a whole spectrum of ways that situation could have gone down.

i have a hot bagel waiting for me in my bed so ill say this: (kkvgz), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:35 (fifteen years ago)

and a whole lot of details that we know nothing about

ENBB, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

yes, we've seen a counselor...at this point we are on the road to separation

no she's never said that mother thing.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, she could have gained 80 lbs because the spawn of Satan is growing inside of her

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:37 (fifteen years ago)

One thing I can tell you: when I get home tonight, I'm going to do some rowing, eat a salad, andfuck my wife.

i have a hot bagel waiting for me in my bed so ill say this: (kkvgz), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:37 (fifteen years ago)

dk, obviously people will change physically over time, BUT if the ONLY thing that arouses you about your committed partner is their physical appearance then maybe your attitudes about intimacy & sex are unsustainable and also fucked up? also, if this anecdotal cheater actually valued his family as much as is implied, maybe he should have tried any number of options to work on the sex problem WITHIN the relationship before going extracurricular. sorry to be throwing down so many *value judgements* but i just can't get down with this.

what exactly are the things that are supposed to arouse you?? she was not really interested in touching him and was emotionally cold. and how do you know that he didn't work on the problem within the relationship? obviously I don't really know the whole story - just his side.

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

(Chris, are you actually cool with discussing all of this on a public message board?)

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

yes, we've seen a counselor...at this point we are on the road to separation

sorry man. sounds like things are pretty bitter around yr house, this may be for the best.

but um yeah also what Dan said...?

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:39 (fifteen years ago)

and for all i know my wife could be cheating on me for the past few years for all i know...at this point, i could care less.

not really dan, but where else am i to vent. i should just can it, you're right. if i could somehow get my name not to show up...

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:39 (fifteen years ago)

i would suggest bringing up the issue of "seeing other people" before actually doing so.

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:40 (fifteen years ago)

sounds like cheating on her now would just be the nail in the coffin

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

to be honest, i have ZERO plans of seeing any other people. I think i would like to take some ME time before anything...like 5 years of me time.

and I HAVE NO PLANS TO CHEAT ON HER!

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

so can we get that straight....

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

i dunno, it's no surprise that a dude values sex but still i kinda feel it's his responsibility to address these concerns with his wife, either directly or in the company of a therapist, instead of using a problem in the relationship to excuse his bad behavior -- obviously i don't have the full story here but motivations don't make excuses

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

chris, I'm sorry about y5r situation too dude

i have a hot bagel waiting for me in my bed so ill say this: (kkvgz), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

two years in a relationship w/out getting laid seems excruciating.

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah Chris I've been wondering about the msgbrd thing too. God forbid she ever finds out about ILX and uses it against you somehow?

Maybe new login? IDK if that would be that much better but couldn't hurt?

ENBB, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

i am in 1000% agreement w/elmo here

xpost thread is deindexed now as well btw

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

tru dat. i shall change log in.

how do i not get my name in ( )

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

and fwiw i have felt nauseatingly guilty after having a sexy dream about a third party so cheating is maybe outside of the things i can rationally understand, ymmv

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

I really really feel for that whole sitch, chris. Also, if you can't talk to us, where CAN you go to get some perspective, to let out some hurt, and/or to have your friends shake some sense into you? I support the use of ilx for this purpose.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

look, all I'm saying is that many people view sex as something like recreational drug use, where it's just an issue of self-control or whatever, but there's so much more to the issue. look at all the sex scandals that break every day...I think this is a deeper issue than most in this thread are really giving it credit for.

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

lots of people use recreational drugs too

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

and have drug addictions.

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:46 (fifteen years ago)

There also a lot of people that don't use recreational drugs, or do use them and do not develop addictions.

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:46 (fifteen years ago)

Basically you're a bigger idiot than you give yourself credit for.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:47 (fifteen years ago)

Is I think what she's trying to not say.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:47 (fifteen years ago)

a tabloid really isn't going to run a story: BREAKING NEWS! MAN RESISTS TEMPTATION TO CHEAT ON WIFE!

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

CHAMPION ATHLETE TELLS ATTRACTIVE WOMAN AT BAR: SORRY, I'M TAKEN

sarahel, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:51 (fifteen years ago)

Basically you're a bigger idiot than you give yourself credit for.

does the circle of judgement know no bounds!?!?

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

There also a lot of people that don't use recreational drugs, or do use them and do not develop addictions.

durf. that really wasn't the point at all.

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:55 (fifteen years ago)

seems like people are in some agreement here: cheating is pretty bad!

no really, if you're unhappy, then try to work it out honestly and openly, and if you can't get to a resolution, then leave. that's reasonable. but what if you have huge competing claims, like kids? kids throw the whole transactional logic of this out the window. assuming that the relationship is unworkable AND ALSO un-leavable because of parental responsibility, then what? basically someone is going to be unhappy, it's a matter of deciding who, you, your partner, your kids, and how much. who gets to suck it up and suffer for someone else?

goole, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:55 (fifteen years ago)

No relationship is unleavable, although I guess look who's talking? It took me a year to work out the details/find the financial wherewithal and that was just a cohabitation.

But a friend of mine has just completed the final steps of a very amicable divorce with split custody of two young kids who seem perfectly unfazed by the whole thing because now they get to live at TWO houses and mom and dad will be even better friends than before. I know that this couple kinda made it the best-possible and you don't always get to choose what situations you find yrself in, but you can still do a lot.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

I guess it took me a year from start to finish but I didn't srsly entertain the leaving idea until the last few months, then it went pretty quickly.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:00 (fifteen years ago)

takes two to not-tango

goole, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:00 (fifteen years ago)

just dropping in here to say that using this doesn't excuse anything and imo pretty repugnant to indirectly blame "the fat wife" for your cheating.

― tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4:14 PM (37 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

otm

horseshoe, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:01 (fifteen years ago)

So she can betray him for cheeseburgers, but he can't betray her for a tart?

i have a hot bagel waiting for me in my bed so ill say this: (kkvgz), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

But a friend of mine has just completed the final steps of a very amicable divorce with split custody of two young kids who seem perfectly unfazed by the whole thing because now they get to live at TWO houses and mom and dad will be even better friends than before. I know that this couple kinda made it the best-possible and you don't always get to choose what situations you find yrself in, but you can still do a lot.

― go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4:59 PM (17 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah i was going to say, i don't see why having parents who are staying together who no longer have a functional relationship is good for kids? i personally was relieved as hell when my parents got divorced. (cheating wasn't the problem there, but still.)

horseshoe, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:18 (fifteen years ago)

do you really want your kids to have a fat mom who wont give BJs when they could have a pretty new mom??

max, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:23 (fifteen years ago)

I had a friend who got married young, had two kids, and kept in good shape, while his wife gained like 80 pounds and lost pretty much all interest in sex..."twice a year, maybe" is what he told me. Women were chasing him all the time so really I don't blame him one bit for acting on it (which he did), of course he wanted to keep his family together and do right by his kids so he didn't tell anyone (they divorced a few years ago so maybe she finally found out)...all that said, yes this guy is definitely being shady

alternate possibility: dude was not attracted to his wife because of her weight gain while he kept at being a gym rat, and i'm getting the sense that the 80 lb weight gain was accidentally betrayed as the real reason for the lack of sex and also accidentally betrayed which party really lost interest. even if the story is true he sounds like a bit of a creep just w/all the trash talking about his wife behind her back, her issues may have very well been related to depression or whatever.

omar little, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:26 (fifteen years ago)

however your friend may of course actually also have been stuck in that scenario of hapless skinny bro stuck with the overfed sexless wife, like the reverse of a cbs sitcom.

omar little, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:32 (fifteen years ago)

yah divorce being treated as like omg kids wont be normal just serves to treat children of divorce like pariahs

so fly zone (D-40), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

Overfed husbands on CBS sitcoms are, unfortunately, not undersexed enough -- they still get laid whenever they want, at least unless the wife is being "like that" again and not putting out because she's peeved at him for some imagined infraction which she's shown to be misguided about over the course of the next 47 minutes.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:39 (fifteen years ago)

wives are so silly

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:40 (fifteen years ago)

jesus how long are CBS sitcoms now

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:41 (fifteen years ago)

i'm getting the sense that the 80 lb weight gain was accidentally betrayed as the real reason for the lack of sex and also accidentally betrayed which party really lost interest

gotta say I'm impressed you can get that from a two-sentence post on a messageboard by a stranger paraphrasing something his friend told him

I only use this style of type when I choose it (DJ Mencap), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

With their "ideas" and their "goals" -- it's so cute when they have goals.

xp I assumed they were an hour long, but it's possible they just FEEL like it?

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe it's because they always show two episodes back-to-back.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

kind of think that if you're in a relationship w/someone then you should be able to actually talk to them about whatever issues you have that might lead you to cheat, and if you can't talk about them or if the talking doesn't work, then that's pretty much a sign the relationship should end (at which point having sex w/other people can happen in a non-cheating context)

lex pretend, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

I don't know, I saw about 5 minutes of Mike & Molly and I swear that by the time I got to the remote to change the channel, I was 50

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

in the case of the fat wife, dude should have opted for talking the situation over swiftly, so that she'd be rid of him sooner

lex pretend, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

id still sympathize with someone stuck in a relationship with a person suffering from depression, however it manifests itself. i think you can have compassion for both people in that predicament. you can't have too much compassion in general, even for "disgusting savages"--and i dont think that precludes a sense of justice or right and moral behavior. it's not an either/or proposition.

ryan, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:45 (fifteen years ago)

that's basically what i see as frogbs's point anyway.

ryan, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

yeah in practice i don't think i'd ever rush to judge any of my friends if i found out they were cheating - don't think i'd even make more than a token protest

lex pretend, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

Really?

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

there's a pretty big difference between "this is what you should do" and actually doing it, though

I appreciate the psychoanalysis omar but that never really seemed to be the case to me. I mean since the divorce he has definitely bagged some ugly women so I don't think that was really much of an issue.

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, i'm wary of condemning to the point of confrontation about personal relationships that aren't mine.

xp

lex pretend, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

more reasonable answer: i've known a couple of people who have slept with others and they're actually very decent folks, and in one case the relationship was subsequently vastly improved after the revelation of the cheating. of course i've known a few creepy cheaters as well. point being that sleeping with another person is pretty much a case-by-case basis with some reasons being a little more "legit" (i guess) than others, though i think cheating is always wrong. probably should just deal with your issues or bad relationship first before you sleep with someone else.

omar little, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

oh I'm ready for some confrontatin', but the odds that I'll ever see this woman again at all are diminishing daily (which is weird in its own way)

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

Really?

How could you talk someone out of it unless they were like, 14? Being condescending and judgemental towards your friends for stuff that doesn't involve you is a good way to lose friends. It's not like they don't know it's wrong.

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:55 (fifteen years ago)

Anyone who can cheat on their spouse and crow about it to his friends/lie to his or her offspring and family for an extended amt of time is not a friend I'd be concerned about keeping.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:56 (fifteen years ago)

t's not like they don't know it's wrong.

honestly not so sure about that in this case

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:57 (fifteen years ago)

he put chicks in a bag

so fly zone (D-40), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:58 (fifteen years ago)

i was thinking more of a friend confiding that they're cheating rather than crowing? idk i am friends with people for reasons other than how they behave in romantic relationships, really - if they're being really egregiously dickish about their situation (eg the fat wife thing, or crowing about it as you said) it's likely i wouldn't be friends with them in the first place.

lex pretend, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:59 (fifteen years ago)

like people (her girlfriends, etc.) that what she's doing is wrong and hurting people and her reaction seems to have amounted to a lot of incredulity/incomprehension

xp

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:59 (fifteen years ago)

tell her that

argh

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 21:59 (fifteen years ago)

just want to disagree in an overlong way to the idea that children contribute to a relationship being "unleavable" -- your relationship as parent and co-parent is different than your emotional commitment to your partner -- those kids unite you in some way as long as they exist. if you have kids with someone, you're pretty much going to be involved in each others lives no matter what, unless you electively abandon your kids to the other parent -- in which case you represent a much grander breed of disgusting savage.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:01 (fifteen years ago)

I'm mostly friends with people because I like them as human beings, although I'm sure there have been exceptions I mean after all I hung out with the noise bored for years. But at some point of that kind of cheating behavior I'd have to reconsider the original basis for the friendship.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:02 (fifteen years ago)

Anyone who can cheat on their spouse and crow about it to his friends/lie to his or her offspring and family for an extended amt of time is not a friend I'd be concerned about keeping.

I don't really approve of what he did but why should I really care about that? It's not like the woman was ever even friendly to me for chrissakes. I mean if he had a history of being shady obviously I wouldn't really want to be friends but I'm capable of being friends with people without judging everything they do.

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:07 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, why should you care about someone you didn't even know.

Please, keep digging.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:08 (fifteen years ago)

so he killed a guy, not like it was anybody I know. I'm sure he had his reasons.

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:09 (fifteen years ago)

I cheated on a woman just to watch her cry.

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:10 (fifteen years ago)

Keep digging? Oh thats right you're the person who called me an idiot upthread? Why care? Because I'm not a hypocrite and don't feel like taking unnecessary moral stands?? God knows if I cared enough for the people I don't know to alter my life to the point where I'm hanging out with a different set of people I'd probably be working in a soup kitchen and ringing for the Salvation Army

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:11 (fifteen years ago)

lol Alfred

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:11 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.salon.com/aug97/entertainment/company970801.gif

omar little, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:11 (fifteen years ago)

I'd probably be working in a soup kitchen and ringing for the Salvation Army

there are worse things you could do with your life tbh

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:12 (fifteen years ago)

i can see a huge difference between a friend saying "oh god dude i fucked up real bad and idk what to do" and one saying "dude you should see this gal i got over here on the side you would not believe the things we get into"

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:12 (fifteen years ago)

In the scenario frogbs mentions not sure I'd react to the friend telling me the tale with more than a shrug and a "you know this could get fucked up right?". I mean his first concern is his friend not the wife who never got on with frogbs in the first place. It's not like frogbs was introducing his mate to potential hook ups for crying out loud.

kuyty on a mission (pandemic), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:13 (fifteen years ago)

i can see a huge difference between a friend saying "oh god dude i fucked up real bad and idk what to do" and one saying "dude you should see this gal i got over here on the side you would not believe the things we get into"

yeah exactly; it's not like he was bragging, it was more like 3 AM comedown "real talk". he's not really proud of himself.

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:15 (fifteen years ago)

btw comparing cheating to murder is probably the worst analogy i've ever read on ILX, a site full of terrible analogies

frogbs, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:16 (fifteen years ago)

hardline judging of friends for personal shit is nagl imo - even outside of specifically cheating, i've been party to feuds and arguments and break-ups where many parties behaved shittily to each other - in some cases i told them they shouldn't act like that, in others i left well, well alone, in no cases did i remonstrate or confront or consider dropping them as friends. actually, not totally true - but the people i quietly dropped weren't people i was super-close to anyway.

lex pretend, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

the older i get, the more just minding my own business seems like the best course of action. it's sort of my own moral compass.

ryan, Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:20 (fifteen years ago)

lex really otm itt

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:33 (fifteen years ago)

idk i think part of true friendship is the ability to help people out of bad situations, so i find it odd to be all hands off if some dude i know is cheerfully boning peeps on the side.

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:38 (fifteen years ago)

because yknow lots of situations like that do end in awfulness and heartbreak for everybody involved

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:39 (fifteen years ago)

They can end in murder!

i have a hot bagel waiting for me in my bed so ill say this: (kkvgz), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 23:13 (fifteen years ago)

i know what you're sayin jjj, but at the same time, there's rarely a payoff in lecturing etc to adults, even with the best intentions.

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 23:22 (fifteen years ago)

the lovely emma b says cheating is not a deal-breaker as long as 1) you always come back and stay loyal 2) you never, ever tell. which goes against every protestant bone in my body (heh) but.. i dunno. i feel like ILX i kind of designed to make blanket statements about things and this is one of those things where blanket statements are easy to make but the underlying responsibility and story and at-faultness is just infinitely variable. which is probably why so many movies and books get made about it.

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 23 March 2011 23:56 (fifteen years ago)

like regarding number 2 in my post above, i remember during the whole monica lewinsky thing thinking that clinton was behaving honorably by lying, like that's what any good dad and husband would do. is that crazy?

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:01 (fifteen years ago)

feel like ILX i kind of designed to make blanket statements about things and this is one of those things where blanket statements are easy to make but the underlying responsibility and story and at-faultness is just infinitely variable.

truth

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:05 (fifteen years ago)

whether something is a deal breaker or not is determined by the original terms of the deal.

estela, Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:06 (fifteen years ago)

the lovely emma b comes from a culture that is allegedly far more permissive/realistic about this sort of thing iirc?

mookieproof, Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:09 (fifteen years ago)

or so the cinema would have me believe

mookieproof, Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:10 (fifteen years ago)

It goes back to what someone posted upthread about Roger Daltrey and how he's been with his missus 40 years despite his "look I'm a rockstar, so this is the deal" - which in effect is polyamory. I have friends who seem to make that work for them somehow. I dont ask after the specifics though. Theyre not actively living with multiple people, but they have permission to play, I guess?

Borads of Candida (Trayce), Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:12 (fifteen years ago)

But, that isnt cheating of course.

Borads of Candida (Trayce), Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:13 (fifteen years ago)

one of my best friends told me a while ago that he was cheating on his wife. this was particularly disturbing to me because his wife is awesome. i expressed disapproval, which resulted in him not mentioning anything about their relationship for several years.

i gather that there was an ultimatum at some point. i do know he stopped that affair and that he and his wife are still together.

her father is/was a serial family-maker. she is in the second of three sets of his children. my friend's parents are still together.

it is my understanding that from his point of view, at least, they have very little "intimacy," though whether that was a prelude to or a result of his infidelity is unclear. (they are both attractive fwiw.) i suspect that he would be open to further cheating.

what is my duty here, then? he's a guy i've known half my life and has been v. good to me. i think less of him and i feel bad for his wife, whom i really like. would ilx have me intervene somehow in their relationship, or dump him as a friend?

mookieproof, Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:18 (fifteen years ago)

well i'd say from the limited info that

1 - it's not really any of your business (to be blunt, sorry!)

2 - even if it were, sounds like the ultimatum stopped his cheating, so what would this intervention consist of

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:22 (fifteen years ago)

o i agree. but i've a sense that some posters would suggest otherwise

mookieproof, Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:24 (fifteen years ago)

oh wait a minute haha you want to cheat with her don't you

DON'T DO IT, FOR THE LOVE OF CHRISTOPHER

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:24 (fifteen years ago)

Wait, what!? I didnt get that at all!

Borads of Candida (Trayce), Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:26 (fifteen years ago)

lool

mookieproof, Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:26 (fifteen years ago)

it's not really your business, especially if she's aware of it.

If you know the other partner well, and they're not aware of infidelity, that's much more of a moral dilemma.

I'd still tend to keep away from getting involved though.

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:30 (fifteen years ago)

I'm home AND I'm back online!

Re getting involved, there are too many variables. But to me, a friend who was willing to cheat in an on-going way is someone I would just stop telling personal things to or answering messages from very promptly, if they told me about it and if they intended to continue, or even if they didn't intend to but the behavior repeated over time. It's not a chastisement, it's more my own knowledge of what kind of environment I want to live in/create w people.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:41 (fifteen years ago)

Also I have def had a talk with guys I have known who had long-dist or traveling gfs and at least MENTIONED to them that if they gave in to that girl at the club who kept trying to kiss them/go home with them, they would be fucking up something actually worthwhile AND ALSO I would know. What they do with that info is up to them. But it's not like no one notices, you know? If you want your friends to think of you as "a cheater" and not a stand-up guy who does right by his lady or has a sense of honor or fairness or w/e, go right ahead.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 00:47 (fifteen years ago)

Someone who ho's around that much probably never had any "sense of honor" or fairness to begin with.

I mean, we're not all eighteen years old, are we? Honor and fairness is something we should have mastered in junior high or at least high school. People who haven't demonstrated that should be cut loose, trying to change people with bad habits is a waste of time.

It Makes Me Sick All of the Cruising You Do At My Expense (u s steel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 08:22 (fifteen years ago)

Why is the woman always an innocent party in this? Women who don't pay their own way undercut what other women do. Women who fulfill a stereotype of sticking with a man who cheats are not feminist women, but when they get cheated on the guy is a dog. You can't deliver the goods if you're high-maintenance and needy and can't accomplish anything on your own.

It Makes Me Sick All of the Cruising You Do At My Expense (u s steel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 08:49 (fifteen years ago)

years later I am still friends with bro (shit, now our KIDS are friends) and bitch is to the curb.

― the sound of a norwegian guy being wrong (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, April 26, 2010 7:17 PM (10 months ago) Bookmark

nice. http://forums.hellproject.com/Smileys/default/emot-thumbsup.gif

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Thursday, 24 March 2011 09:48 (fifteen years ago)

Prefer not to judge a person if they are doing some cheating. Depending on situation I might offer an opinion (if I had a specific opinion) but I would be more likely to shy away from doing that.

If I was asked my opinion then I would give it, but in a quite...non-attacking way - I would just say "well since you have asked my opinion, then you must value my opinion in some way so here is my opinion 4 u" - though every situation in life is different, I try not have a fixed way of approaching anything

cherry blossom, Thursday, 24 March 2011 09:50 (fifteen years ago)

As for a third person, if you don't know them well then it is like blaming the rain for getting wet instead of yourself for not wearing a coat

cherry blossom, Thursday, 24 March 2011 09:52 (fifteen years ago)

i think these two tracer posts are really otm:

the lovely emma b says cheating is not a deal-breaker as long as 1) you always come back and stay loyal 2) you never, ever tell. which goes against every protestant bone in my body (heh) but.. i dunno. i feel like ILX i kind of designed to make blanket statements about things and this is one of those things where blanket statements are easy to make but the underlying responsibility and story and at-faultness is just infinitely variable. which is probably why so many movies and books get made about it.

― 40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, March 23, 2011 7:56 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

like regarding number 2 in my post above, i remember during the whole monica lewinsky thing thinking that clinton was behaving honorably by lying, like that's what any good dad and husband would do. is that crazy?

― 40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, March 23, 2011 8:01 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

not crazy at all! lying can often be the most decent option. though obviously it's more decent to not cheat at all. but i think honesty for its own sake is something of a false grail... people over-valorize telling the truth in situations where it will probably only create more anguish

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Thursday, 24 March 2011 10:12 (fifteen years ago)

i had a friend confide in me a while back, rather glibly, that he was looking to start something 'on the side' with some girl he just met. i was immediately like, you freakin monster. but then after a minute i was like, i guess i can't really cast stones, and we had some Real Talk where he admitted he respected his gf too much to really do it. but ever since then i've kinda had a policy not to be too judgy if my friends get into some shit like that, i mean whats the point?

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Thursday, 24 March 2011 10:20 (fifteen years ago)

fessing up to wrongdoing is definitely overstated as a virtue.

So, discretion if you're gonna do it?

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 10:23 (fifteen years ago)

I would probably think better of them if they cheated with me

cherry blossom, Thursday, 24 March 2011 10:30 (fifteen years ago)

depending who they were of course

cherry blossom, Thursday, 24 March 2011 10:31 (fifteen years ago)

Darragh the way you said that is sounds like you're condoning it which I know you're not but guess I agree. I mean, I still can't really get on board with ppl who intentionally and repeatedly cheat (see co-worker I mentioned yesterday) it just seems too wrong BUT I also think there's something to be said for not telling. As I said, I've already told her that I think she needs to either a) end it with the bf and move out or b) end it with the co-worker asap and stay with the bf but I also told her that if she chooses to do b then she should prob never tell the bf because, in the end, she'd be doing so only to make herself feel less guilty and it would destroy the bf.

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 10:33 (fifteen years ago)

discretion is for after the fact not to ease the continuation of

cherry blossom, Thursday, 24 March 2011 10:36 (fifteen years ago)

yeah - i'm presupposing that it's happened, and not condoning it, but in that situation your options as a listener/friend are pretty limited, realistically

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 10:44 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah. I've already told her what I think of the situation and let her know that I feel for her and understand that it's complicated. If she keeps this up for a long time or seemed really blasé about the whole thing I might feel differently but, as it is right now, I like this person a lot and think she's really confused and got into some dumb shit but I'm not going to end a friendship over that.

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 10:54 (fifteen years ago)

one of my good friends is pretty much a serial cheat. I'm certain his gf knows as much as she wants to know. I've told him i dont want to hear about it, and i'm never going to be an accomplice in it, but we've been friends a long time, i love them both, and i just trust that they'll manage their own business.

They're gettin married this year, afaik he's actually been dormant ever since the engagement- maybe that's their deal? I dont know, i dont really want to. They've been together since they were 15, i'm not sure they maybe just didn't find the best solution for them?

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 11:12 (fifteen years ago)

his fiancee, i should say, obviously

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 11:13 (fifteen years ago)

can't stop myself posting philip roth, here, on cheating. these two pages:

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DOit5trhKvcC&lpg=PP1&dq=roth%20everyman&pg=PT129#v=onepage&q&f=false

not telling is not an option. if you want to be kind and protective, you get a chance to do that by not cheating, you know; withholding critical relationship info is decision you shouldn't get to make. i totally get that the repurcussions of this are brutal & maybe telling someone is as wounding a move and can be motivated by ego rather than care, but all the same, i think getting to know what your relationship's like & how it works is a basic right.

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 11:27 (fifteen years ago)

sorry, that's kinda overly succinct & aggro, and i get that these things happen, but it feels as deceptive to withhold as to cheat in the first place, to me.

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 11:28 (fifteen years ago)

x-post I see what you're saying and it does make sense but again, as with all of this, I think it really depends on the situation.

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 11:34 (fifteen years ago)

yeah & that is probably the takehome from this thread. i know that sometimes people's universe narrows down to some cloes-up situation in which they end up cheating, and, what are you gonna do about it after? it's probably best that you don't additionally tear up someone's life, down to where they live, how they define themselves, etc. but for all of that withholding and letting someone walk around with the wrong idea in their head just feels as brutal a thing as you can do to someone.

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 11:42 (fifteen years ago)

No, you're right, it does but I feel like both options are pretty brutal at that point albeit in different ways. Damn this stuff can be overwhelmingly complex if you really start to think about it.

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 11:50 (fifteen years ago)

I had this girlfriend when I was way younger who, in the last month or so of our relationship, I have every reason to believe (outside of actual, concrete evidence) was cheating on me. In retrospect, I recognize a lot of cues from other points in our relationship that indicate that she may have been cheating on me throughout our relationship as well. With a serious buffer of time between then and now, I appreciate more the good and happy times that we had together more than I would have appreciated her being honest with me - however illusory they may have been.

A note: I've never cheated on anyone and could never even imagine myself cheating on my wife, regardless of any imaginable situation. But I can see how for someone, infidelity might be part of the tapestry of their human experience or whatever, in some respect.

i have a hot bagel waiting for me in my bed so ill say this: (kkvgz), Thursday, 24 March 2011 11:58 (fifteen years ago)

i tend to agree with your hard line on it schlump- for myself. It's the position you're put in as a third party 'in the know' where it's a greyer area imo.

Never cheated, so whether i'd be as in favour of the hard line in that position, i don't know.

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:04 (fifteen years ago)

omar little & a bunch of other ppl upthread are otm imo when they say cheating's something you can really only think about on a case-by-case basis.

like, i have a friend who i've seen cheat on his gf in the past (i've told him i'm not cool with it but that's really about as far as I can go, there) - i'd always assumed his gf kind of knew, but apparently he's told her he's not done more than kiss another girl. And you could say that never telling her is the right thing to do, because it would hurt her horribly, but the fact is she kind of suspects it - and then he denies it - and then she blows up about some girl he's not actually cheating on her with and he's all 'girl why u mad' - and basically he ends up making her feel like she's this crazy paranoid jealous girlfriend who's imagining things. I'm not saying that discretion after-the-fact doesn't work, and mightn't be the most sensible thing in many cases, but when it goes wrong it can be hugely harmful.

c sharp major, Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:25 (fifteen years ago)

what a dick

no judgment but really

BIG GERTRUDE aka the steindriver (history mayne), Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:29 (fifteen years ago)

no judgment but really

lol this is probably where i'm at. at some thorough, human level i am never gonna assume i know enough about someone and their mad reasons and the labyrinthine complexities of being inside a relationship/being in a situation when someone ends up cheating to judge. but i think you're pretty open to a one dimensional what a dick at the least.

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:44 (fifteen years ago)

Since I don't cheat, ever, I really freak out when people do things I consider 'disloyal'. Two 'friends' of mine - an ex and a former best friend - wound up having a fling and swearing our mutual friends to secrecy, which had the fabulous bonus effect of all those embarrassed-by-the-wrongness being mysteriously emotionally unavailable while it was happening, which left me wondering why I felt unusually isolated from my friends at a time when I was going through unrelated but awful personal shit. The ex pretended like nothing was happening with his fling partner, while the 'best friend' happily chatted away about my lingering feelings for the ex with me and suggested courses of action should I want him back. So all these people kept something from me which, had I known, would have been much better for me because at least I wouldn't have had vague feelings of insecurity and paranoia - much worse than the sharp shock of confirmed hurt feelings about the reality of a situation. There are few things worse than feeling like you're the last honest person on Earth...

anna sui generis (suzy), Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:00 (fifteen years ago)

cheating's something you can really only think about on a case-by-case basis.

no. wtf.

of course there are an infinite number possible circumstances but i would challenge that only a tiny number of those are actually extenuating.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:11 (fifteen years ago)

like: your partner has been in a coma for years. you should get some leeway for that.

"i was drunk and mad at my fat wife and tempted by a nubile undergrad" doesn't cut it.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:17 (fifteen years ago)

Elmo I don't think anyone here (except maybe Frog?) would disagree with you those points.

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:19 (fifteen years ago)

one of my good friends is pretty much a serial cheat. I'm certain his gf knows as much as she wants to know. I've told him i dont want to hear about it, and i'm never going to be an accomplice in it, but we've been friends a long time, i love them both, and i just trust that they'll manage their own business.

friend of mine is a bit like this too. largely we consider it his own business but occasionally if it's just the guys there might be a bit of a tendency to criticise him for it, in a jokey way, and he'd be quite silent and free of justification about it.

the thing is I dunno, I am pretty sure he loved the people he cheated on deeply.

LocalGarda, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:26 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, i respect that you feel strongly on it, but nobody's really arguing for the latter case at all.

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:28 (fifteen years ago)

xp, obv

Yeah ronan, it's something very similar with this guy. It's not anything i'd try to justify, i guess i just compartmentalise the part of him that does that away from the guy who i've known for 15 years and who i ilke to spend time with.

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:32 (fifteen years ago)

i don't find myself morally judging him too much really. i dunno, i feel weird about this kind of thing.

sometimes ostensibly "good" people i know who are less open about what they do seem more morally questionable to me, i think i self identify as guilty or am quick to judge myself and hence i empathise with people who are open, if not proud, about bad behaviour.

whereas people who are more morally forthright, i kinda wonder where that confidence comes from, and judge them more harshly for bad behaviour.

LocalGarda, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:38 (fifteen years ago)

well hypocrisy's just an added bonus to the whole discussion i'd say

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:52 (fifteen years ago)

i empathise with people who are open, if not proud, about bad behaviour

i'm not saying i don't understand this, but having been party to a few situations where certain people's horrendous behaviour was swept under the carpet, prob for similar reasons, it's pretty much enabling - this is why people who behave like cunts feel they can (and often do) get away with it, if they're not called on it

lex pretend, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:58 (fifteen years ago)

and yeah it's the responsibility of friendship groups to do that, to an extent - who else will?

lex pretend, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:59 (fifteen years ago)

i don't really mean i forgive it, i dunno, and not specific instances. i think i just feel more at ease with people who know we are all sinners </ catholic>

LocalGarda, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:59 (fifteen years ago)

Again someone repeatedly acting like a tota cunt and not giving a shit about it v. fucking up once and stressing about it. Like, I don't think I could be friends with someone like Darragh and Ronan are describing and not have it bother me at least on some level. I would probably remain friends with them but if this sort of behavior was something that was happening over and over again and if the person in question didn't think it was troublesome at all then I think I'd start to have some serious issues with them. I don't even know what this thread is about anymore tbh.

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:02 (fifteen years ago)

don't really understand ronan's reasoning -- i get people saying it's difficult and sometimes impossible to call out cheaters but not that it's actually sort of better to cheat than not!? i guess it makes a difference how well you know the injured party.

BIG GERTRUDE aka the steindriver (history mayne), Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:07 (fifteen years ago)

What kind of bad behavior, is it funny bad behavior or bad behavior as in cruel and mean to others? I assume most of us have jobs and other boring life commitments where the office / church / whatever bad guy or girl can be a forgivable source of amusement.

Of course we're talking about cheating, which on the surface is pretty sleazy, I think it's sleazy because people don't even admit to themselves what they do. It's all the icky guilt issues that bother me.

I Sincerely Think You Have No Class At All (u s steel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:13 (fifteen years ago)

of course there are an infinite number possible circumstances but i would challenge that only a tiny number of those are actually extenuating.

oh elmo i'm not saying that i think cheating is justified! To me it seems a really terrible thing to do to someone you're supposed to love and respect. But when it happens it always seems to be so rooted in the particular relationship of the couple that you can't really apply a blanket set of rules to it.

c sharp major, Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:22 (fifteen years ago)

My best friend cheated on his girlfriend of 3 years with the woman he ended up marrying. He cheated on future wife a couple of times when they were going out but stopped, as far as I'm aware, once they got engaged. Now been married 10+ years and has 4 kids. Seems pretty happy. I probably got on with girl number one far better than I did/do with his wife but pretty much kept my opinions to myself. My actual thoughts on the matter were more along the lines of ' don't be a dick' mixed with 'why would you risk fucking up your relationship for new girl who's not all that' etc. Considering they're now married glad I decided to keep these thoughts to myself tbh. He did what was right for him and pretty sure he doesn't regret a thing.

kuyty on a mission (pandemic), Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:37 (fifteen years ago)

as one of my friends puts it, when his wife accuses him of cheating (which he has never done)..."I already have one crazy bitch in my life, why do i want another one."

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:44 (fifteen years ago)

Elmo I don't think anyone here (except maybe Frog?) would disagree with you those points.

No...look, I am not saying that cheating is sometimes "okay" or whatever. I don't support what my buddy did but I will say I understand his side of the argument. If in 5 years my wife became unattractive and completely uninterested in sex I would like to think I'd have the balls to let her know that something has to change or I'm out. Realistically, I'm not so sure it would be so easy to do the right thing. It's so easy to just relax and say you would always take the high road. Its like those who have never smoked being condescending towards those who just can't quit; I mean sure you can feel disappointed in them and it can lower your opinion of them, but you shouldn't think these people are weak unless you've really felt their situation. That's really all I'm trying to say. I don't know what it's like to feel trapped in a bad marriage.

frogbs, Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:45 (fifteen years ago)

i also have a close friend who cheated on his first wife, they were miserable (they were married really young) and ended up divorced, he remarried the girl he cheated with and he is much happier. He broke down and told me one night years ago and how it was killing him because he had a young son at the time. But he couldn't take it anymore.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:47 (fifteen years ago)

x-post - yeah I didn't necessarily think you'd agree but it seemed like some people were misinterpreting some of what you were saying yesterday and thought if I put your name in there maybe you'd explain more which you have.

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:50 (fifteen years ago)

He should have stayed with his hot old wife, who was at his level, in terms of professional looks. I mean cheating on your wife with a desperate public housing resident is pretty embarrassing. I live in a black neighborhood, professional guys think fat black ass is hot all the time but need the skinny model to save face.

Millionaire Seeks Ghetto Boo Boo Bah Bah Sex Slave (u s steel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:54 (fifteen years ago)

If in 5 years my wife became unattractive and completely uninterested in sex I would like to think I'd have the balls to let her know that something has to change or I'm out.

you're okay with her having the balls to kick you out if you get unattractive too, right? i'm not trying to be difficult, but just, considering how broad notions of 'become unattractive' are, or how complicated the conditions behind gaining some weight might be, this just seems way too straightforward. people falling out of love is a thing, but making it sound like some sort of selfish/remissive failure to upkeep the merch is weird.

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:55 (fifteen years ago)

xp: well all right then

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:56 (fifteen years ago)

He should have stayed with his hot old wife, who was at his level, in terms of professional looks. I mean cheating on your wife with a desperate public housing resident is pretty embarrassing. I live in a black neighborhood, professional guys think fat black ass is hot all the time but need the skinny model to save face.

― Millionaire Seeks Ghetto Boo Boo Bah Bah Sex Slave (u s steel), Thursday, March 24, 2011 10:54 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

WTF?

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:57 (fifteen years ago)

amazing

BIG GERTRUDE aka the steindriver (history mayne), Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:57 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, cheating is a part of life at the professional level. Can't take your black ghetto mammy to the office.

Your Acting Sucks and Your Pictures are Stupid (u s steel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:58 (fifteen years ago)

us steel is http://www.ilxor.com/ILX/ThreadSelectedControllerServlet?boardid=40&threadid=19026

goole, Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:59 (fifteen years ago)

oh shit that didn't work

goole, Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:59 (fifteen years ago)

yeah what

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:59 (fifteen years ago)

uhhhhhhhhhhhh

again wtf

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:00 (fifteen years ago)

oh my.

i have a hot bagel waiting for me in my bed so ill say this: (kkvgz), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:00 (fifteen years ago)

huh

La descente infernale (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:01 (fifteen years ago)

good to know

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:01 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rloidlFbi4w

i have a hot bagel waiting for me in my bed so ill say this: (kkvgz), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:03 (fifteen years ago)

..........

lex pretend, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:04 (fifteen years ago)

shit, now i'm never gonna get any work done. was in the mood for a trainwreck though...

scott seward, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:07 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.cpcml.ca/images2010/WorkersEconomy/Steel/USSteelShark-400.jpg

kid 606: the nultness (nakhchivan), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:08 (fifteen years ago)

I think that was too perfectly formed and timed to cause a trainwreck, like everyone is just sitting there stunned by the platonic ideal of wrongness and is incapable of mustering an actual response.

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:08 (fifteen years ago)

^^^

yes

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:10 (fifteen years ago)

you guys only noticing us steel now? Wtf at all of you tbh, dude's been 'on fire' for a few days now.

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:11 (fifteen years ago)

I don't know, feels like it's missing something. It could do with an ill-thought out, lazy, ignorant and stupid blanket statement about Islam and the gays to make up the set.

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:12 (fifteen years ago)

us steel is an interesting poster who has been around for a while

kid 606: the nultness (nakhchivan), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:12 (fifteen years ago)

I swear I read somewhere that u s steel is a ladyposter btw

could be wrong

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:13 (fifteen years ago)

"interesting"

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:13 (fifteen years ago)

she is, iirc xp

kid 606: the nultness (nakhchivan), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:14 (fifteen years ago)

*steeples hands, leans chin into steepled hands*

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:14 (fifteen years ago)

Why all the drama? Cheating is a very serious subject, it can contaminate people's family relations and their workplaces. I was just responding to one of the stories upthread. A lot of people cheat because they married someone for family pressures or career pressures when their actual taste is a bit downmarket.

Your Acting Sucks and Your Pictures are Stupid (u s steel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:14 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xekfBhiqfig

kid 606: the nultness (nakhchivan), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:15 (fifteen years ago)

i think i'm actually gonna do the ban thing. i've never done it before. nothing, um, personal.

scott seward, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:15 (fifteen years ago)

my dad wants me to settle down with a 'nice girl', but me personally, i only fill from the skank tank

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:16 (fifteen years ago)

SS NOOOOOOOOOOO, I thought we were cool!

x-posts you're a little nutty, huh?

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:16 (fifteen years ago)

Why all the drama? Cheating is a very serious subject, it can contaminate people's family relations and their workplaces. I was just responding to one of the stories upthread. A lot of people cheat because they married someone for family pressures or career pressures when their actual taste is a bit downmarket.

I think the point is that your response includes an idiotic racist generalisation.

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:16 (fifteen years ago)

this has all the characteristics of an actual train-wreck now btw, people are gathered around talking about the thing in questioning voices even though the whole wreck is still just right there to look at

xxxp

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:17 (fifteen years ago)

dmac is even poking it with a stick

kid 606: the nultness (nakhchivan), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:17 (fifteen years ago)

wait, i wasn't gonna sb you, enbb. now i'm confused.

scott seward, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:18 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, it's a little like watching the beginning of an avalanche

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:18 (fifteen years ago)

oh god now he's got a bit of broken piston

kid 606: the nultness (nakhchivan), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:18 (fifteen years ago)

what is he doing

kid 606: the nultness (nakhchivan), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:18 (fifteen years ago)

lol I know Scott - I joke! :)

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:18 (fifteen years ago)

deems, put the stick down

kid 606: the nultness (nakhchivan), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:18 (fifteen years ago)

brb, need to go hide my black ghetto mammy

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:19 (fifteen years ago)

awww

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:20 (fifteen years ago)

How is making fun of racist attitudes racist? Keep rolling, my soulful meaningful brothah! Corporate guy trying to have an affair with a lower class black woman is racist, please try harder to keep up on black community issues.

Your Acting Sucks and Your Pictures are Stupid (u s steel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:21 (fifteen years ago)

You are high.

i have a hot bagel waiting for me in my bed so ill say this: (kkvgz), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

Keep rolling, my soulful meaningful brothah!

"Check it out now, my soulful meaningful brothah!"

http://youthoughtso.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/fatboy-slim.jpg

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:24 (fifteen years ago)

oh man...

scott seward, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

btw I am stopping now, the last time I got into it with this poster the results weren't pretty for anyone

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

you're okay with her having the balls to kick you out if you get unattractive too, right? i'm not trying to be difficult, but just, considering how broad notions of 'become unattractive' are, or how complicated the conditions behind gaining some weight might be, this just seems way too straightforward. people falling out of love is a thing, but making it sound like some sort of selfish/remissive failure to upkeep the merch is weird.

Maybe I should clarify this a bit; I'm talking about just not taking care of yourself, like "well, I'm married so I don't have to attract anyone anymore, so I don't have to work out and can eat whatever I want", instead of, say "I developed a glandular problem somehow". It's only kind of about being superficial about looks. It's also about wanting your partner to care about what you think and not take you for granted. I mean that's sort of the root of cheating a lot of the time isn't it? "My partner doesn't really care what I think anymore, but there are other people who do". I mean dating at first is always such a rush of trying to present yourself in the best possible light and consequently seeing the better things in your bf/gf, I would think losing that completely really would be depressing.

frogbs, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

this is funny.

xposts

got electrolytes (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:28 (fifteen years ago)

http://images1.cliqueclack.com/tv/files/2011/01/the-korean-bookie-1024-425x239.jpg

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:30 (fifteen years ago)

xxp: well, and a partner who isn't going to get adult-onset diabetes or heart disease or some shit like that.

i have a hot bagel waiting for me in my bed so ill say this: (kkvgz), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:30 (fifteen years ago)

A wife who won't die.

i have a hot bagel waiting for me in my bed so ill say this: (kkvgz), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:31 (fifteen years ago)

ok jesus christ people considering that very few of us get better looking as we age after a certain point, the idea that sliding attractiveness is a promoter of cheating is just so so weird to me.

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

ok wait that last statement by frogbs makes things a little clearer but idk i still am kinda creeped out by that attitude.

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

don't think a person likes to be taken for granted is all

cherry blossom, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

i think frogbs has been tryin to clarify that it's more a hypothetical case of 'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u'

Which, tbh, is something i'm pretty sure i'm at least a little guilty of when i'm in a relationship. Being single is good for my waistline

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

(and yes, i am aware that part of my reason for making that argument right now is roughly akin to talking really loudly to distract everyone else in the elevator after someone unloads a huge fart.)

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

ok jesus christ people considering that very few of us get better looking as we age after a certain point, the idea that sliding attractiveness is a promoter of cheating is just so so weird to me.

On this tip with you. The idea that "attractiveness" is even one of the issues here is...off-putting.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

it's kinda like nationalised industry = contractors getting all complacent, kicking back while they work and letting infrastructural work be super expensive and not so thorough, versus privatised industry = everyone is bidding and a lot of people lose out but the people who do a real good job win the first prize, and in this analogy frogbs is margaret thatcher

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

Mutualised industry = a great big orgy?

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

A person you don't love anymore or respect or want to be vulnerable to etc is gonna become unattractive no matter HOW fit they keep themselves or w/e. Also the described scenario is pretty bare-bones and wtf in terms of what behaviors of each partner possibly led the other partner to act/react, and so on.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

the movement of an economy towards privatised industry = the slow ebbing of your romantic flame; the gradual wandering of your monogamous mate

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:48 (fifteen years ago)

I feel like the "attractiveness" part is getting too much of the focus, I was reading it more as shorthand for a partner that changes dramatically after marriage or whatever. As in, stops being hygenic or taking care of themselves or whatever. Still, imho, no excuse for cheating, but I don't think it was entirely meant as a "boring old wife got chubby and now I want hot, young poon" thing.

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:49 (fifteen years ago)

Ie if my partner is a dick and I start feeling like he's being a dick but I'm too confused/afraid/intimidated to say anything, one quick side-effect is that I'm gonna stop feeling like having sex with him.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:49 (fifteen years ago)

omg

got electrolytes (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

On this tip with you. The idea that "attractiveness" is even one of the issues here is...off-putting.

totally disagree. it's not "attractiveness" per se, but the idea that you should still make an effort to be someone your partner wants to be with. obviously that doesn't give someone a license to cheat or leave guilt-free once aging starts to take effect, but i think trying to keep yourself reasonably healthy & together is pretty important.

adult music person (Jordan), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

I think the point really is more that for many of us, when we start thinking about things that attract us to our long-term partners, there are attributes that are not physical; tying primacy down to those physical attributes seems, from some viewpoints, immature.

Like, if you actually fall in love with a woman, you are falling in love with all of her, not just her bodacious rack, so if she becomes the same personality with an awful rack the bond has already been made and you aren't caring as much as you thought you would.

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:51 (fifteen years ago)

people often let themselves go - its not just physically, its caring about things, taking an interest in things, taking an interest in the other person, getting comfortable with routine

they're all kind of the same thing imo

cherry blossom, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:52 (fifteen years ago)

no i know, and i get that, i just always wonder how much of the "well what if my spouse gets uglier and wants to have sex less" is coded fear of the aging process, because hoo buddy guess what, we're all gonna get that way eventually.

millions of xposts also yeah pretty much djp otm

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:52 (fifteen years ago)

awesome screenname coda to super romantic post
xp @ dan

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

I think the point really is more that for many of us, when we start thinking about things that attract us to our long-term partners, there are attributes that are not physical; tying primacy down to those physical attributes seems, from some viewpoints, immature.

OTFM. grow up, people.

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah but I'm saying, we have no idea whether HE continued to be a partner that SHE wanted to be with in any area other than physical fitness. The only part frogs has described is p much the absolute most shallow aspects of the sitch so everything else is speculation, but NOBODY is coming out smelling very good here.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

I was reading it more as shorthand for a partner that changes dramatically after marriage or whatever. As in, stops being hygenic or taking care of themselves or whatever. Still, imho, no excuse for cheating,

right, not an excuse for cheating, but a valid reason to end the relationship (hopefully after some honest & concerned communication, and address whatever issues are in play [depression or other problems in the relationship etc.])

xp

adult music person (Jordan), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:54 (fifteen years ago)

I think its perhaps just as much "what if my spouse starts engaging with things less and starts to lose the spark and verve that was the draw in the first place" - this manifests in many ways, physically is just one

cherry blossom, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:54 (fifteen years ago)

ok jesus christ people considering that very few of us get better looking as we age after a certain point, the idea that sliding attractiveness is a promoter of cheating is just so so weird to me.

That's not really at all what I'm saying though. Look I know that people are superficial but it's more a factor of "Why is she not even trying to look good for me anymore? Am I not worth it?" and realizing that there are women out there who would make the effort. There's a difference between saying how much you love someone all the time and actually doing things that you don't want to do for them. I don't like washing dishes but I do them because I know that my wife doesn't like it either. I know she'll do them if I don't and I know she won't get pissed about it, but hey, that's love.

frogbs, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:54 (fifteen years ago)

pics or it isn't empathisable, is what i'm getting from everyone here

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

haaaaaaaaaaa

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

if a person in a relationship is really "letting him/herself go" i feel like "cheat on that person" should be waaayyyyy down on the list of possible recourses

max, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

Do people stop engaging or being interested in things because they get boring or lazy or, alternatively, because they get busier and real life pressures get in the way. Seems to me it's closer to the latter in most relationships over time. It's easy to have spark and verve and be interested in loads of things when you're young and have a lot of time on your hands.

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

maybe a preliminary pep talk; 'if you don't turn things around, i'm probably going to start cheating on you'.
xp

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:58 (fifteen years ago)

Haha you think you're kidding. I've had that basically said to me.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:58 (fifteen years ago)

I think that is known in the common parlance as a "dealbreaker"

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

Well actually it was more like "If you don't behave in ways that I like, you're going to be alone...forever." But you know, it's all basically the same. Yeah, and really truly this is my bad for not kicking that to the curb long before.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

first part of matt's last post new board description pls

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

T/S conforming to ways-i-like vs being alone forever

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

Do people stop engaging or being interested in things because they get boring or lazy or, alternatively, because they get busier and real life pressures get in the way. Seems to me it's closer to the latter in most relationships over time. It's easy to have spark and verve and be interested in loads of things when you're young and have a lot of time on your hands.

Yeah, I suppose you're talking mostly about having kids, but obviously someone who "lets themselves go" because they're too busy with the kids/job or whatever doesn't really fit what I'm talking about. It's more about people who take the easy road because they figure they've already got their partner locked up.

frogbs, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:02 (fifteen years ago)

contact and touch is so important. it keeps you connected to someone. when people get too busy or too lazy or too tired to touch each other - even a hug - then this is the slippery slope to a rut that is hard to get out of. and its when people start looking elsewhere because people want to be touched. it also gets harder and harder to re-establish contact if you aren't physically close on a regular basis. then you just become roommates. and when you have that contact and intimacy you tend to keep loving the person you fell in love with no matter what kind of horrible monster they turn into over time. so stay in touch.

scott seward, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

partner locked up = cannot get exercise
xp

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

See the sheer presence of the mindset "locking the partner up" just betrays really tediously bad things about the rel'ship as a whole that are inconsistent with being awesome human beings.

xp lololll

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

man idk that just seems so paranoid to me? like of all the reasons i would guess my SO had for physical qua undesirable changes, slacking because they had me on lockdown wouldn't be at the top of the list xxxpost

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

Do people stop engaging or being interested in things because they get boring or lazy or, alternatively, because they get busier and real life pressures get in the way. Seems to me it's closer to the latter in most relationships over time. It's easy to have spark and verve and be interested in loads of things when you're young and have a lot of time on your hands.

― Matt DC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 08:56 (6

They do it for all kinds of reasons (partner working away a lot is prob right up there in terms of reasons for cheating)

cherry blossom, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:05 (fifteen years ago)

schlump LOL
Laurel otm re: "Locking up"
SS: OTM x 1000 and when that's not there anymore (for whatever reason)it can be a HUGE problem

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

It's more about people who take the easy road because they figure they've already got their partner locked up.

this is not a person you should cheat on, its a person you should divorce

max, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

"Why is she not even trying to look good for me anymore? Am I not worth it?" and realizing that there are women out there who would make the effort

So what efforts is he making for her? I mean I guess to a guy the effort of not sticking yr wang in 18-year-olds is maybe a whole lot bigger than the willpower required to lose 80 pounds and keep it off, but for me one of those sounds quite easy and the other really doesn't, and you can guess which is which by my gigantic rippling waistline and lack of 18-year-olds (or wang)

dimension hatris (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

(really its a person you shouldnt have married in the first place but we all make mistakes)

max, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:06 (fifteen years ago)

"Hey ive noticed all your teeth are falling out because you stopped brushing them 6 months ago - you do realize i can still bail any time i want to, right?"

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:07 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, what max said. This is not the kind of relationship to have at all, ever. Even if you both stayed attractive to 22-yr olds forever.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

"Why is she not even trying to look good for me anymore? Am I not worth it?"

the big problem I have with this line of thinking is that my thought process would be:

"Why is she not even trying to look good anymore? Is there something wrong I can help her with?"

like, it wouldn't be about what she is doing for me at all; it would be about what she is doing to herself

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

certainly, that's how i'd *phrase* it, sure

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:13 (fifteen years ago)

JOKES PPL JOKES

Thread has got really focused on one very specific thing, mainly to have a bash at frogbs's friend who none of us have ever met.

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

i am just trying to establish an extensive pre-marriage what a swell guy in relationships blanket PR campaign

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

Well you have to take into account that not everyone has the same amount of foresight as you guys do. People marry young or after knocking someone up. Also, you have a different set of values as you get older. I mean I don't know if you guys are all just better people than me but I do have a voice in the back of my head that is telling me to take the easy road on all sorts of things.

frogbs, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

some of these issues/excuses seem a bit more indicative of having got into a relationship for the wrong reasons, rather than cheating for the "right" reasons

lex pretend, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

may 'attraction' or whatever in this case (or any case) is really a smaller bit of something bigger and more pervasive, like 'not loving anymore'

i mean we can draw a venn diagram or w/e, but 'no longer attracted' seems kind of superficial, but 'don't love you anymore' invites less judgement.

goole, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:17 (fifteen years ago)

If frogs doesn't want us to have a bash at his friends, he should maybe stop telling stories about them in the most thoughtless and shallow and gender-fucked way possible. Fewer references to bagging ugly chicks, for instance.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

im still incredibly attracted to my wife, she just isn't to me though. i would happily bang her at anytime, instead i rely on the web.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

im still incredibly attracted to my wife, she just isn't to me though. i would happily bang her at anytime, instead i rely on the web.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

twice. awesome.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:18 (fifteen years ago)

I think jjj and I have known each other long enough to know that we can both vouch for each other being thoroughly horrible human beings

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:19 (fifteen years ago)

oh god yes

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:19 (fifteen years ago)

remember that bag of kittens?

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

i actually kind of admire the apparent conservatism that makes people not want to get divorced? but i would admire it more if it was paired with the kind of commitment to a marriage that would preclude cheating

max, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

boy they never saw THAT coming xpost

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

still worth it for the look on the principal's face

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:21 (fifteen years ago)

fewer references to bagging young nubile kittens would make this thread a way nicer place fwiw

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_DMgBO5uWGSU/Rp62_RgN9eI/AAAAAAAAACw/a6kxwChXFdY/s400/_cute_kitten.jpg

rowr

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

If frogs doesn't want us to have a bash at his friends, he should maybe stop telling stories about them in the most thoughtless and shallow and gender-fucked way possible. Fewer references to bagging ugly chicks, for instance.

Ehhh if my posts are what you see as most thoughtless and shallow and gender-fucked things possible, I would say you should probably go outside more. I mean this is a semi-anonymous message board, why tiptoe around the subject? Do you think I don't accept that men don't do their share of horrible shit/taking people for granted?

frogbs, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:24 (fifteen years ago)

LAUREL GO OUTSIDE MORE OKAY?

scott seward, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

I'LL DO THAT AS SOON AS IT STOPS FUCKING HAILING, NOT GOING ANYWHERE TIL THEN TBH

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

one of my best friends is/was cheating on her husband (we haven't had a chance to talk in a few months but she a had a long flirtation + made out w/this co-worker). it's a shit thing but if i'm honest, i think her husband deserves it bc he's a douche. of course, if it was anyone else i'd be totally judgmental.

thing is, i warned her this would be the result several years ago, when a couple weeks after her wedding invitations went out, she called me in tears bc her fiance had told her that he didn't know if it was gonna work out anymore bc he needed a 'hot girl' and she was just 'cute'. i mean, what kind of adult says something like that. he is infamous in our home town crowd for being a totally sleazy creep who nobody liked, it always annoyed me they ended up together bc she is truly too good for him. anyway: they made up (kind of), and when i advised her to cancel or at least postpone the wedding, she refused bc she really wanted the big fancy wedding (which forever changed how i perceived her tbh) and thought that this was her only chance.

she is still w/the husband but apparently 'in love' with this other guy. however, for some pretty serious practical reasons she says she can't leave him - but i'm with laurel, i don't think any relationship is unleavable.

just1n3, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

the big problem I have with this line of thinking is that my thought process would be:

"Why is she not even trying to look good anymore? Is there something wrong I can help her with?"

like, it wouldn't be about what she is doing for me at all; it would be about what she is doing to herself

Well when it comes to maintaining yourself there are obviously two sides to it. It's up to you to determine what it is.
And I absolutely think that the man can be responsible for driving her to neglect herself.

frogbs, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

that guys sounds like a cocksmoocher.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

and vice versa.

xpost

got electrolytes (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

arguments about which partner's at fault for the decay of a relationship are a great part of the later stages of the decay of the relationship. when you're at the point of assigning blame it is really fucking hard to repair what's happening

a SB-in' artist that been in the game for a minute (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

she called me in tears bc her fiance had told her that he didn't know if it was gonna work out anymore bc he needed a 'hot girl' and she was just 'cute'

I would totally cheat on this guy. What a jackass.

i have a hot bagel waiting for me in my bed so ill say this: (kkvgz), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

yeah is he some meathead?

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

i would marry that guy just so i could cheat on him on a whole other level

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

i can't even picture a human being saying such a thing. how can you not call it off after something like that?!

xpost ha ha

got electrolytes (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

i would marry him, then gain 80lbs out of spite

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:39 (fifteen years ago)

my guess is this guy has a blowout.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:39 (fifteen years ago)

sounds similar to what a friend of mine who was dating a younger guy went through lately (he told her he wasn't sure he could commit cuz he wanted someone with a "tight body" - he dumped her a year later saying "I just don't love you as much as you love me"). assholes what ken ye do.

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:39 (fifteen years ago)

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_3AkRloVuSJM/R8TftshOrlI/AAAAAAAAAXk/__CjLulQ9n0/s400/guido01.jpg

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

I would say to him, "by the way, I only married you for the big party and I've been cheating on you, feel free to go and fuck that hot girl if you want" and then point and laugh as he slowly realises that he can't.

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

if you're discussing private matters on a public avatar you should really change your avatar pic, chris
xp

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

oops, public forum

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

he slowly realises that he can't.
wait why couldn't he?

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

he is infamous in our home town crowd for being a totally sleazy creep who nobody liked

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:43 (fifteen years ago)

sounds totally alpha to me

goole, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

lol sleazy creeps that nobody likes get laid all the time

a SB-in' artist that been in the game for a minute (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:45 (fifteen years ago)

there are avatars on this board??

frogbs, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:45 (fifteen years ago)

You guys are just making up these stories at this point, right?

Virginia Plain, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

maybe we should have a separate thread for alphamales and why they should be culled from the herd

my story is 100% true and from within the last few months

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

sad thing is my friend is hardly fat or unfit or whatever - she is in perfectly decent shape and cute and all that. just, ugh, the blow to her self-esteem. I wanted to beat this guy.

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

xps yeah the thing is that when they hooked up she didn't know him at all, but i had friends who did - he owned a popular bar and there were numerous stories about what a dick he was, and i myself saw his know-it-all dickery in action, but lol i wasn't in a position to comment since i was also dating a total psychopath.

they also had an open relationship, where he could basically sleep with whomever he wanted, so i don't know why he needed to marry a 'hot girl' when his 'cute' fiancee was already letting him fuck whoever. and he's not even that good looking.

just1n3, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:51 (fifteen years ago)

i think reality set in last year for her when he starting ~~really~~ pressuring her to have kids and she realised that she could not ever imagine breeding w/him, despite the fact that she really wants a family.

just1n3, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

My bf hasn't wanted to sleep with me in a couple years. Recently we were mulling this over and he said, hey, you know it's nothing personal, right? So I asked if he thought I was still fanciable, in theory. He thought for a minute and said I don't know, you have at least one hat that I've looked at you in and thought 'urgh'.

It's not enough to stay thin, people. Choose yr hats with care. *shoots self*

Also unknown as Zora (Surfing At Work), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

wow

just1n3, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

bar owner... open relationship... pressuring to have kids...

this guy is off the damn charts. is your friend living in an awful romantic comedy? this is nuts

xps wow the hats

what is happening on this thread

goole, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

just1n3, just out of sheer nosiness, what are the 'practical reasons' why your friend won't leave this guy?

goole, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

WOW. I have had some fucked up things said to me somewhat recently (one of which was a suggestion that I shoot myself in the head) but that is a bridge even beyond. Or at least on par. What are you...HOW are you? to Surfing.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

Zora would it be rude to ask why you've hung in there for that couple of years?

a SB-in' artist that been in the game for a minute (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

the hat thing

I can't even

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

was he serious?

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

I read the hat thing as a dodgy joek, I was wondering more about why one stays in a relationship after the sexual attraction has taken a nose-dive

a SB-in' artist that been in the game for a minute (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:59 (fifteen years ago)

xps to goole: it's work visa/job stuff + financial stuff. but like i said: not impossible to deal with. last time we talked i tried to remind her what an incredibly independent, capable, motivated person she was (and still is) before she married this guy. she is still trying to start her career, and the nature of her work is pretty niche and hard to get jobs, and most of the jobs are short contract, so i think she's really scared of trying to do it on her own.

just1n3, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:00 (fifteen years ago)

It's documented in the Sex Droughts thread. In a nutshell, he has valid reasons for losing his libido that have nothing to do with me or the hats, and I've been trying not to be that shitheel who leaves someone cause they're ill.

(some xposts)

Also unknown as Zora (Surfing At Work), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:00 (fifteen years ago)

does this guy fuck hats or what

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:00 (fifteen years ago)

Wash fucking a hat.

Also unknown as Zora (Surfing At Work), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:01 (fifteen years ago)

and fyi: my friend IS super hot, not just cute. she has a rockin' body and the best boobs i have seen irl, which just goes to show that her husband is even more of a stupid douche.

just1n3, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:01 (fifteen years ago)

I've been trying not to be that shitheel who leaves someone cause they're ill

I totally feel you on this and you have my regards

a SB-in' artist that been in the game for a minute (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

You've seen her boobs irl? xp

i have a hot bagel waiting for me in my bed so ill say this: (kkvgz), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

pics or it didn't happen

xpost

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

someone was going to say it, so I was just getting it out of the way now

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

uh yes.

just1n3, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

it's my understanding that when women are alone together it's mostly just non-stop topless pillowfights and shots of tequila

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:05 (fifteen years ago)

correct me if I'm wrong ladies!

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

I've been trying not to be that shitheel who leaves someone cause they're ill

--------

I totally feel you on this and you have my regards

― a SB-in' artist that been in the game for a minute (Noodle Vague), Thursday, March 24, 2011 12:03 PM (2 minutes ago)

^^^^ ;_; ^^^^

WmC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

NO Shakey Mo you are dead right.

Justin3 I am feeling all kinds of outraged on behalf of your friend, I hope she sees the light but tbf I know a lot of people who stay in bad relationships for worse reasons and well, who am I to cast nasturtiums etc.

FWIW bf *was* serious viz the hats. He does thing when he's really tired of delivering bizarre truthbombs, this was one. I think it's pretty funny, nonetheless.

Also unknown as Zora (Surfing At Work), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:12 (fifteen years ago)

please do not correct him even if he is wrong tbh xposts

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:12 (fifteen years ago)

yeah ^^^ right on re: this. for all the talk of the importance of the physical side of a relationship itt it is so the case that it's sometimes necessary to ride out a spell of time without, for the other person's sake, when the alternative is like ... people having sex against their natural preference, purely to satisfy their partner's needs.

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:13 (fifteen years ago)

The thing is I think you have to be somewhat willing to respond to your partner's needs, and very much willing to recognise that those needs are valid, and real, and that not acknowledging this will bring consequences. "What does he/she want sex for, it's so selfish, can't he/she see I am too tired/stressed/depressed/busy?" is a common enough response, and boy does it miss the mark.

Also unknown as Zora (Surfing At Work), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:16 (fifteen years ago)

my wife just says she's not interested. MY BONER IS SAYING I AM.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:18 (fifteen years ago)

yeah that's really not good enough imo - everyone goes through different phases of libido etc. but at some point you have to recognise that your partner has put up with a lot and you need to give back a little, not bc they might cheat bc that is a stupid emo form of blackmail, but bc you love them and want to satisfy them

just1n3, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

uh oh

adult music person (Jordan), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:22 (fifteen years ago)

By 'consequences' I didn't mean 'cheating', more that well, it fucking hurts to be constantly rejected and denied intimacy, and if you love someone you don't want to be inflicting that pain. Perhaps the no-libido people don't realise how painful it is, idk.

Also unknown as Zora (Surfing At Work), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:23 (fifteen years ago)

yeah try 10 years of that shit oops wine talking

a SB-in' artist that been in the game for a minute (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

yeah that's really not good enough imo - everyone goes through different phases of libido etc. but at some point you have to recognise that your partner has put up with a lot and you need to give back a little, not bc they might cheat bc that is a stupid emo form of blackmail, but bc you love them and want to satisfy them

yeah (at this point in the thread i wanna embody my arguments in fictional friends of mine, since there are so many third-persons walking around here), but i guess it depends what those reasons are. kinda hesitant to go into detail here but if someone is sincerely not feeling it, & not getting anything from things, then i feel like riding it out is the right thing to do, and maybe psychically best for a person who just needs time or to work through their thing. i don't know.

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:28 (fifteen years ago)

But at some point the non-sex condition of the relationship becomes what the relationship IS, not just a passing phase until you get back to the "real" way of being together.

I stayed w someone once who was sick and needed time but it rly messed me up over time and in order to cope, I had to revise the whole set-up in my head and eventually it just wasn't a partner relationship anymore.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:33 (fifteen years ago)

are married ppl incapable of masturbation? if your sex drive exceeds your partner's maybe you DO need to cheat on them with yourself

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

dude i rub them out constantly.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:37 (fifteen years ago)

It's difficult b/c there can be a mental block about getting turned on, whereby people think they have to be all into it before they start, whereas in fact often it works the other way round. It's often worth giving it a go, IMHO. OTOH if you are srsly not into it you have to feel able to say 'stop' b/c it is soul destroyingly vile to repeatedly have sex you're not into, even if you love the other person (I have been on that side, too.)

Cheating is not the answer ofc, and for me an open rel would not work either.

xpost Laurel - I can see that. Did the other person feel the same, if that's not too personal a q for public board?

xpost elmo - ffs, there's a difference between 'sex drive exceeds' and 'no sex whatsoever'. INITMACY IS AN ISSUE>

Also unknown as Zora (Surfing At Work), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:38 (fifteen years ago)

I am the son and the heir of a wandering man & I think I will always hold it against him despite my desire to forgive; but well into my second decade of (het) marriage I know the mismatched libido thing pretty well & so do most of my (male) friends; but then again we're all still fathers of relatively young children & I dunno, things are just hard all around (& yes I mean that with a sad smirk)---BUT these are days of other joys too & what I understand about my father now is a rejection of the maturity to embrace those other joys, & yeah "it's just blowjobs" or whatever but the devil's in the details.

Euler, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:38 (fifteen years ago)

INTIMACY, grrr.

Also unknown as Zora (Surfing At Work), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:38 (fifteen years ago)

chrisv2010, maybe you addressed it previously and sorry if i missed it but why are you sticking it out in this marriage?

omar little, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

Having a caregiver/patient blanket thrown over the top of what started out as a spouse/lover/friend relationship fucking sucks. Because that blanket is very heavy, hard to move and hard to ignore, even on days when it's not specifically needed.

WmC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

for my son...which is not the right reason.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

i think scott's advice about physical contact is a good one and i think constant friendly but zingy bantering is also maybe underrated.

omar little, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

you gotta watch the zinging though. i am a very zingy person and i am always checking myself cuz if you zing about the same thing for a long time that shit gets really old. but generally humor is great to share and give and take and all that. definitely. helps reinforce the us-vs-world feeling. and diffuses tense situations. you know.

scott seward, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

leaving a relationship seems a much easier response than cheating in a lot of these cases, in the long run, but hey that's easily said.

Wow at hats story and lots of other stuff in the meantime btwc

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

yea scott's advice is absolutely OTM -- my bf has lately been having back issues that require us to sleep separately but i require cuddles daily. i can go weeks w/o sex (and have) as long as we can at least smooch & spoon a little.

i'm a very touchyfeel partner and i really sympathize w/ those itt who go without -- if i didn't have the touching i'd probably gain the 80 lbs as i tried to soothe my soul with rare bacon cheeseburgers. :(

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:48 (fifteen years ago)

Zora - eventually the other person did come around but by that time it was over in my head. I had to stop wanting to be intimate w him in order for it not to be destroyingly painful to be near him all the time and be rejected. End of.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

Leaving a relationship is easier but for many people its actually kind of hard, in practical terms - especially if have been living together. Leaving the family home, finding a new place to live, starting everything over - again the reasons mentioned above where people have lost their spark or whatever, its the same thing, if they've felt a bit ground down - to regain that spark to start over. And then fear, and guilt and all the rest

cherry blossom, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:50 (fifteen years ago)

^^^

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:52 (fifteen years ago)

In my family, we don't make commitments we aren't willing to keep. But it's not cheating if you're not married. Those are my family values. So, it's like, deal with my family or I'll find someone else. With glee. My family isn't here to support someone's career either. We are very traditional and you only get married when your family and your spouse's family have mutual interests. My family comes first and if you have problems adapting to that you are out.

Personally I don't think it's cheating if you're not married. Sorry about the hetero bias here.

Your Acting Sucks and Your Pictures are Stupid (u s steel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:52 (fifteen years ago)

And what is it if you're in a relationship? "Angle shooting"?

frogbs, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:54 (fifteen years ago)

Personally I don't think it's cheating if you're not married

You'd be so much in the minority with that opinion that it'd be about as credible to the person you'd be cheating on as "it's not cheating if it's not emotional" or "it's not cheating if it's within five miles of a tiger".

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:55 (fifteen years ago)

I guess I should feel VERY fortunate/grateful to not have this mismatched libido problem (at least, not yet)...

otoh this:

BUT these are days of other joys too & what I understand about my father now is a rejection of the maturity to embrace those other joys

is still very u&k to my sensibility. imho part of getting older as a man is realizing that you don't really need to be banging lots of hot women all the time - like, there's more important shit, and if that's what yr fixated on you are basically just an emotionally stunted loser.

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:55 (fifteen years ago)

i'm often tempted to find someone else without glee, but that's more of a tv scheduling issue

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:55 (fifteen years ago)

In my family, there is problem...

goole, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:55 (fifteen years ago)

Laurel - I think I've been striving for that for a long time; I really can't understand why I can't make that shft, but the attraction just won't lie down and *die*.

Also unknown as Zora (Surfing At Work), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:55 (fifteen years ago)

i tried to soothe my soul with rare bacon cheeseburgers.

My soul totally susceptible to the above, that might just work.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

masturbation isn't really a problem solver here - more often than not 'sex' is really a stand-in for 'knowing that my partner desires and loves me above all others and thinks i'm special'. is that always rational? probably not. but 2 years is a really long time for zora to go without getting that from her partner, even if he is sick, and then for him to be like 'you know it's not personal, right?' seems pretty glib imo.

just1n3, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

(xps to elmo)

just1n3, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

i dont wanna go out and bang another woman, i want to just bang my wife.

i again have not had sex with my wife in two years.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:57 (fifteen years ago)

Z - I don't know what mental exercises you've already done so pls bear with me, but have you thought about WHY you want him back? Like does it feel like winning? Or is it that it's preferable to giving up the dream/visions you had of your future together? Because ime once you make that first step you will not be sorry.

Nobody requires us to be saints who sacrifice ourselves so that someone else doesn't feel bad. You are not disposable.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:58 (fifteen years ago)

Exactly so, Chris. I'm not interested in anyone else, although Cherry Garcia is helping me out a little.

Also unknown as Zora (Surfing At Work), Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:58 (fifteen years ago)

"are married ppl incapable of masturbation? if your sex drive exceeds your partner's maybe you DO need to cheat on them with yourself"

i am VERY pro-masturbation, but for real, this can make you feel pretty lonely too if you live with someone you love and want to be with!

i mean, there are so many reasons why someone could be unhappy in a marriage or relationship. its usually never one thing. but with cheating i think loneliness and lack of intimacy is a big factor.

scott seward, Thursday, 24 March 2011 17:58 (fifteen years ago)

What if it's not really cheating, what if you realized you made a mistake, that there were class and life history issues that made someone too different? Like I said, there is no commitment if you're not married, no one deserves any guarantee or emotional loyalty at all.

If they're not making you happy, they are out. Sometimes you wake up one day and realize that someone is truly a terrible emotional manipulator and won't confront that. The only way to teach them is to walk out and take up with someone else, never to return. They need to be taught not to let people down and hurt people.

When's Mr Role Model Millionaire Gonna Grow Some Big Ass Balls (u s steel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

at this point rubbing my boner on her ear would suffice for crying out loud.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 18:01 (fifteen years ago)

EAR JOBS ABOUND.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 18:01 (fifteen years ago)

trollololol

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 18:01 (fifteen years ago)

It's 100% legit to say "I will not remain celibate the rest of my life and you have no business demanding that I should."

WmC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

man chris it sounds like you need to get out of this

altho you have no obligation to listen to me and I am not an expert, just a jerk on the internet

Hyper Rescue Troop (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 24 March 2011 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

of course it is wmc! But how do you act on that?

the '' key on my keybord is not working (darraghmac), Thursday, 24 March 2011 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

Laurel, yes, and it is an unpleasant smoosh of love and fear. I sacrificed a lot for this guy, on top of that I have waited a long time for him to be better, he is now almost better (physically) and I want to, what, recoup my investment sounds horrible, but if I walk away now I'll have given up most everything that mattered to me, twice over.

I want our relationship to fulfil the promise it had at the outset, that circumstances have robbed us of.

Luckily we don't have kids, or years & years of marriage behind us. I'm feeling for others on this thread more than myself right now. The hat thing... the hat thing is kind of a get out of jail free card at this stage. If his sexual interest in me revolves more around hats than who I am, we are so not gonna be lovers.

gazillion xposts

Also unknown as Zora (Surfing At Work), Thursday, 24 March 2011 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

i realize the masturbation comment was overly glib, but self-love is everlasting imo.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 24 March 2011 18:13 (fifteen years ago)

I want our relationship to fulfill the promise it had at the outset, that circumstances have robbed us of.

All the times I have said this to myself, and sadly there have been more than one, I have been deeply wrong and fatally optimistic/in denial about exactly what constituted the circumstances.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

Yep, quite prepared for that to be the case. This is way, way OT and TMI, but what the hell, I don't get to talk about this, like, ever... After 2 years of pain, depression, no-sexxing, fights, he decided that though he wants to be with me he no longer wants to have a family. So the sex thing is moot-ish, b/c I am about to embark on fertility treatments, alone. Staying with him for the moment = far less stress than breaking up, moving out, prob changing cities again. This is going to be a slow process; could be many months before it succeeds or fails. We get on fine as flatmates. He definitively friend-zoned himself with the hat remark, so from now on I'm keeping my frustrations to myself (+ ILX).

Also unknown as Zora (Surfing At Work), Thursday, 24 March 2011 18:51 (fifteen years ago)

PS or not even ILX. I think I am OK with not talking about this any more for now.

Also unknown as Zora (Surfing At Work), Thursday, 24 March 2011 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

my wife and i went through fertility treatments.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:03 (fifteen years ago)

i don't even know what to say, but the situations people are in and describing on this thread are seriously heartbreaking. i hope you all find some better way to live, whether it's an improving situation or bailing.

goole, Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:06 (fifteen years ago)

^^^ I can really empathize with some of the posts on this thread but, man, some it is just next level heartbreaking stuff and it makes me really sad. What Goole just said is otm and I wish you the same.

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

i would suggest that as difficult as it may be, the latter option would be perhaps for the best. painful in the short term, but the correct decision when looked back on later in life. to remain in unhappiness because of the unknown future doesn't really seem to be the choice one should be forced to make. i cannot imagine, for example, that chris' wife is happy either. as a child of divorce, i have to say that the first few months were utterly miserable and surreal but after that initial period it became completely normal (for better or for worse.) at this point, years later, i realize that if my parents got back together a few years later it would have creeped me out more than the divorce did.

omar little, Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:11 (fifteen years ago)

my boy is young enough to not really know...but its me knowing. i dont wanna talk about it either...forget it.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:13 (fifteen years ago)

just breaks my heart.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:13 (fifteen years ago)

Z - I understand taking what seems like the less stressful way, I really do, because ILX watched me do it for like half of 2010. In fact it was not less stressful in the long run, it was shit. It was also possibly unusually bad and I hope your life is not like that at all. But don't discount the fact that you want to be in a good mental and physical place for the baby you want to have. For yourself, for your likelihood of conception, and for the fetus that you want to result -- you should be safe and happy if you can, even if that means being happy alone.

I can't find a reference online but my mother has been going on about some study about babies that were gestated during wartime in an occupied country and how many of them were emotionally unstable as grown people even if they got out of that environment very early.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

Like, from their mothers' fear and stress while they were carrying. How can you try to work through something you don't even remember? At least things that happen to us in our conscious lives are fodder for future therapy.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah Laurel that's actually what some of the people I work with are researching - fetal origins are adult disease and you're right - there have been studies that have shown that babies conceived and carried to term by emotionally unstable mothers or mothers under extreme stress have a much much higher likelihood of having emotional issues themselves regardless of the circumstances under which they were raised. A lot of this research is still in its infancy (heh heh) but they're finding some really strong links there.

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:20 (fifteen years ago)

fetal origins OF adult disease

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

(totally an aside but this is also one of the MANY good reasons why the US needs to create a federal maternity leave law - it's absolutely ridiculous that we don't have one imo)

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:22 (fifteen years ago)

Don't get me started on that one! ^^

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:30 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, sorry - it just makes me so mad! But not the right place for it.

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

What are your thoughts on FMLA, and what sort of time period are you thinking?

Virginia Plain, Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

(VP - I guess 3 mo unpaid is better than nothing but ideally I think something like 3-4 months at total pay with an additional couple(optional) months (possibly up to a year) at partial pay. This would allow women to take off a couple weeks before birth and stay home through at least the first three months. iirc the minimum allowed for countries to offer in the EU is something like 14 weeks and most countries grant that at full or near full pay. I'm also total in favor of Parental leave that allows either partner to take some of the time.)

ENBB, Thursday, 24 March 2011 22:04 (fifteen years ago)

I think the latter is essential. In the UK we currently have the ridic situation where a woman can take a year off and a man gets 2 weeks. Going a leeetle against the tide re. gender equality in the workplace.

Laurel, yes I hear you, and frankly my chances of conceiving and carrying to term are fecking shite w/o any extra stress, never mind psychological effects on the child, but I honestly am pretty calm atm compared to how I expect I would be if I was going through a move and a breakup. Based on the last round; I'm not good at this upheaval lark. I may be frustrated, but I feel safe here. I need to feel safe for a while. I don't have a year to spend sorting this stuff out and learning to cope with a new situation. I'm 39. There is no time.

Confused Turtle (Zora), Thursday, 24 March 2011 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

With what happened to my wife after birth, I would push for a nice long paid leave. And a mandatory paternity leave as well.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Friday, 25 March 2011 00:04 (fifteen years ago)

this is many xposts at this point but i just want to say dan p3rry you are the best

horseshoe, Friday, 25 March 2011 01:28 (fifteen years ago)

Well he is superblack after all!

Borads of Candida (Trayce), Friday, 25 March 2011 02:34 (fifteen years ago)

ha i was actually referring to the sane and reasonable response to a partner's appearance changing he wrote above but thank you for alerting me to that!

horseshoe, Friday, 25 March 2011 02:49 (fifteen years ago)

I know -- the outbreaks of sane and reasonable on this thread are seriously impressive and make me grateful that just enough people are like that.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Friday, 25 March 2011 03:15 (fifteen years ago)

horseshoe on the off chance you think i was being bizarre, that was a ref to a lol he made in the WDYLL thread :)

Borads of Candida (Trayce), Friday, 25 March 2011 03:44 (fifteen years ago)

sure sure whatever you say

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Friday, 25 March 2011 03:45 (fifteen years ago)

lol

Borads of Candida (Trayce), Friday, 25 March 2011 03:48 (fifteen years ago)

I think the latter is essential. In the UK we currently have the ridic situation where a woman can take a year off and a man gets 2 weeks. Going a leeetle against the tide re. gender equality in the workplace.

this is changing pretty soon, iirc, so that a set period of maternity leave can be distributed between partners as they see fit. sole silver lining of nick clegg's appearance in a position of power.

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Friday, 25 March 2011 10:54 (fifteen years ago)

A fetus developing under stressful conditions is more likely to be miscarried or to have physical developmental problems or be developmentally disabled. I think those factors are more important than whether they would be psychologically "damaged" (by whose standard?)

E-N-A-B-L-E-R (u s steel), Friday, 25 March 2011 11:05 (fifteen years ago)

. . .

ENBB, Friday, 25 March 2011 11:06 (fifteen years ago)

Those are all also valid concerns, yes.

ENBB, Friday, 25 March 2011 11:10 (fifteen years ago)

xxp: us steel, but being psychological healthy is important too! Sometimes people underestimate and dismiss the importance of mental health. But everybody goes through mental health things - at least every once in a while even if not as a chronic issue - just as everyone catches a cold and many deal with chronic physical problems, such as a trick knee or asthma or whatever. But I think that starting a child off with a positive bill of mental health can be of as much importance to a parent as those more serious developmental disabilities you mention, even though the consequences aren't as dire, if that makes any sense.

i have a hot bagel waiting for me in my bed so ill say this: (kkvgz), Friday, 25 March 2011 11:59 (fifteen years ago)

Thanks, ENBB. Yeah, paid leave for at least 3 months would be a lot better. Though at my work if you are sick they have you take your sick days during FMLA, so you are in effect being paid, but losing all your sick time -- not sure if that applies for pregnancy. Do any states have equitable maternity leave laws?

Virginia Plain, Friday, 25 March 2011 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

someone got hired today. my fantasies are rolling

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Saturday, 26 March 2011 01:56 (fifteen years ago)

oh , this thread

check out my malady (San Te), Saturday, 26 March 2011 02:01 (fifteen years ago)

and someone came to staff day and danced to "i would die for u". what the fuck!

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Saturday, 26 March 2011 02:03 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=asY08yquddo

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Saturday, 26 March 2011 02:07 (fifteen years ago)

q: if Philip Bailey from Earth Wind and Fire asked you to have a one night stand w/ him would you

check out my malady (San Te), Saturday, 26 March 2011 02:19 (fifteen years ago)

Only if he whispered easy lover in my ear

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah, TWO! (chrisv2010), Saturday, 26 March 2011 02:21 (fifteen years ago)

the lovely emma b says cheating is not a deal-breaker as long as 1) you always come back and stay loyal 2) you never, ever tell.

Tracer, just thinking about this, and what exactly does staying loyal imply here? That you are loyal after the affair or that during the affair you remain cognizant that your spouse comes first? I think The Lovely Emma B's philosophy is probably best in a marriage situation in which monogamy is untenable, but my problem with this, as I understand it, is that you are treating the person outside the marriage like some sort of second-string player, and also, it maybe glosses over the fact that an emotional attachment could develop, making staying loyal to your husband or wife difficult.

Virginia Plain, Saturday, 26 March 2011 14:47 (fifteen years ago)

I am friends with a few married couples that swing, and do so openly. at least do that if you're the type that can't be monogamous, cuz then nobody gets hurt.

check out my malady (San Te), Saturday, 26 March 2011 14:49 (fifteen years ago)

There is a big difference between having an open marriage and being part of the swinging subculture, though.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Saturday, 26 March 2011 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

my problem with this, as I understand it, is that you are treating the person outside the marriage like some sort of second-string player

This is my big issue with poly hookups. The general idea seems to be someone is the "second", usually a woman sadly, and that just seems vaguely pathetic to me, like you're happy with someone's scraps. That's obviously a horribly harsh reductive way of seeing it but its why I dont think I could do it (and I breifly ended up in just such a situ last year, and didnt end up enjoying it).

Borads of Candida (Trayce), Sunday, 27 March 2011 03:02 (fifteen years ago)

that's assuming the third person isn't

i) in a relationship themeselves

ii) quite happy with a non-comittal situation.

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Sunday, 27 March 2011 13:27 (fifteen years ago)

How can anyone make sweeping generalisations and immediately put the blame card on the table? There are so many factors at play in such a situation. As such I think to say this is a black/white situation is very sad. Also, I hate women who always proudly proclaim that they would immediately divorce if their husband/partner cheats. Is that how much you are willing to forgive? One can make a mistake. It is human.

Nathalie (stevienixed), Sunday, 27 March 2011 13:44 (fifteen years ago)

Nath I'm absolutely with you but I'm doing my best to get into one of these firefights

a SB-in' artist that been in the game for a minute (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 27 March 2011 13:54 (fifteen years ago)

(xxp) Well, I think there are people for whom the poly lifestyle seems to work well and reasonably equitably, but I've also known people in the situation Trayce describes, stuck unhappily in a relationship in which they are not getting fair access to the privileges of poly-dom, having been talked into trying it as the only way to get or keep the person they really wanted monogamously

but the last time I knew many polys, we were young and naive and maybe the older ones have worked things out better

(have never been one but when I was a young computer nerd the local geek community was quite intertwined with the local poly community - computer nerd groups are ideal for poly recruitment, since you get a combo of people who see no problem with situations regarded as emotionally volatile bcz surely they are rational science machines, plus people who are not really getting laid and are maybe impressed by these fancy modern-talking action-getting alpha types or maybe just fall for someone and think they may as well...)

dimension hatris (a passing spacecadet), Sunday, 27 March 2011 14:23 (fifteen years ago)

btw I think I completely misread the context of dmac's post and now I reread it I don't disagree with it at all, but don't mind me, I am having one of those days where it feels like I have an outrageous hangover despite not drinking anything since a single lunchtime pint y/day

dimension hatris (a passing spacecadet), Sunday, 27 March 2011 14:34 (fifteen years ago)

I always wondered what was up with nerds and polys and I think your explanation mostly covers it. Thanks.

bamcquern, Sunday, 27 March 2011 14:54 (fifteen years ago)

people who see no problem with situations regarded as emotionally volatile bcz surely they are rational science machines

this explains so much to me

as you can see, they smell terrific (Abbbottt), Sunday, 27 March 2011 15:07 (fifteen years ago)

Also, I hate women who always proudly proclaim that they would immediately divorce if their husband/partner cheats. Is that how much you are willing to forgive?

i dunno about that nath- if you're going to draw a line anywhere wrt relationship/trust/whatever, it's a pretty good place to draw it- just imo

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Sunday, 27 March 2011 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

Think it depends on context

check out my malady (San Te), Sunday, 27 March 2011 16:03 (fifteen years ago)

Trayce, from what I've been told the poly community doesn't like the "established couple looks for babysitter and concubine female third" situation much, either. Studies show that the most stable poly relationships are three-person things that develop naturally, BTW.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Sunday, 27 March 2011 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

Just in case anyone reading this thread wants closure on my story, broke up w/ the wouldn't-be-hat-fucker yesterday, details on the 'thread to get over a breakup' thread on TMI.

Confused Turtle (Zora), Sunday, 27 March 2011 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

i dunno about that nath- if you're going to draw a line anywhere wrt relationship/trust/whatever, it's a pretty good place to draw it- just imo

I think this is exceptionally harsh. No room for explanation at all? Sad. Really. I mean, at least sit the fuck down and listen as to why they committed adultry. Was it a one night stand, why did they do it, do they feel guilty,...
I think a relationship is about realizing that you and the other will make mistakes. At least try to listen as to why.

Nathalie (stevienixed), Sunday, 27 March 2011 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

I think these women think they are strong. That walking away is a strong act. I think forgiving is much harder to be honest. I am not saying it's good per se (because some, to some degree, like to be the victim).

Nathalie (stevienixed), Sunday, 27 March 2011 21:45 (fifteen years ago)

I think a relationship is about realizing that you and the other will make mistakes.

this is very true. And I think I could forgive a one night stand, maybe, depending on the circumstances. but relationships are also built on trust and respect, and cheating is one of those things where when you're the one cheated upon, it's hard to rebuild those two things.

sarahel, Sunday, 27 March 2011 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

FWIW I agree with Nath. Cheating is a sleazy, rotten thing to do but I do beleive there can be extenuating circumstances, and I know several - more than that, lots - of couples who have stayed together despite infidelities and been happy afterwards.

Confused Turtle (Zora), Sunday, 27 March 2011 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

i know lots of guys who are in bands that tour, and it's often an unspoken thing that while the guy's on tour, he will have random hook-ups with chicks.

sarahel, Sunday, 27 March 2011 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

I can't side against people who react either way for a simple reason -- life experience.

Like, someone who has grown up in bad home environments and haven't had many trustworthy companions in their life might have a harder time forgiving someone who cheated on them, even the first time. Likewise, someone who maybe had the opposite experience might not come from as emotional a place and may be able to be more rational.

I don't think either reaction is 'wrong', because the other party still committed a transgression. A cheater has the right to ask for forgiveness...however, they sure as hell don't have the right to whine if they don't get it.

check out my malady (San Te), Sunday, 27 March 2011 21:59 (fifteen years ago)

eh, i had a pretty terrible home environment, but i don't think that's really a lot to do with it, nor do i think it's anything like 'exceptionally harsh' to consider cheating a hurdle they can't o'erleap.

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Sunday, 27 March 2011 22:02 (fifteen years ago)

what i mean is if someone grew up not having many people they could trust, and they think they finally meet someone that they can trust, they might not be real quick to forgive cheating. I've known many people in both categories.

check out my malady (San Te), Sunday, 27 March 2011 22:28 (fifteen years ago)

A cheater has the right to ask for forgiveness...however, they sure as hell don't have the right to whine if they don't get it.

^^^

WmC, Sunday, 27 March 2011 22:42 (fifteen years ago)

Lordy, not saying cheaters have any rights whatever, just that from the cheatee's POV, declaring in advance that you'd kick your partner straight to the curb without hesitation sounds ballsy but isn't necessarily a sound judgement viz. your own best interests.

Confused Turtle (Zora), Sunday, 27 March 2011 22:48 (fifteen years ago)

true, although you never know whether they'll actually hold to that statement.

check out my malady (San Te), Sunday, 27 March 2011 22:51 (fifteen years ago)

like me, I've thought that a million times I'd do it instantly, but given my nature, I probably wouldn't kick em to the curb

check out my malady (San Te), Sunday, 27 March 2011 22:51 (fifteen years ago)

i didn't think i would, and i did hesitate briefly, but his ass was kicked to the curb.

sarahel, Sunday, 27 March 2011 22:52 (fifteen years ago)

yea, I think it's hard to predict your own behavior when you're thinking hypothetically. plus it does sound 'empowering' as someone said above.

check out my malady (San Te), Sunday, 27 March 2011 22:52 (fifteen years ago)

Of *course* forgiveness isn't always possible, and might totally not be a good idea either; I'm with the "no black-and-white easy answers" camp on this.

xposts

Confused Turtle (Zora), Sunday, 27 March 2011 22:53 (fifteen years ago)

...and I've always been disturbed that it's currently considered forgivable for women to do anything short of murder for revenge when cheating happens.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Sunday, 27 March 2011 22:53 (fifteen years ago)

what? no it's not!!!

sarahel, Sunday, 27 March 2011 22:54 (fifteen years ago)

yea, I think it's hard to predict your own behavior when you're thinking hypothetically. plus it does sound 'empowering' as someone said above.

― check out my malady (San Te), Sunday, March 27, 2011 10:52 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

not just hard, impossible. theres no one in my life right now that i think id feel partic butthurt about that kind of thing, bcuz right now the relationship im in, it would mean ive misjudged what the whole thing is about (its a pretty recent relationship) so Id be like, 'wtf, gtfo' if she told me something like that, & be fine, move on

wait a few months, who knows?

or, go from 'hypothetical' to 'it actually happened,' & maybe i realize my feelings were stronger than i thought

idk when it comes down to it its about a really complicated relationship between two people and it depends 100% on context and the people involved

i do think its silly to say, "as long as you apologize i'd probably forgive you" to a S.O. cuz thats basically a pass for them to cheat imo

they reminisce over dayo (D-40), Sunday, 27 March 2011 22:57 (fifteen years ago)

it's often an unspoken thing that while the guy's on tour, he will have random hook-ups with chicks.

kris menace isn't even french (sic), Sunday, 27 March 2011 23:12 (fifteen years ago)

it's not really cheating if there is a prior arrangement. not sure why that keeps coming up.

rockapads, Monday, 28 March 2011 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

agreed

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Monday, 28 March 2011 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

what about emotional affairs etc. as someone who has been through this, they suck.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah! TWO! (thebingo), Monday, 28 March 2011 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

lol @ sic

fuck this bullshit excuse for a biscuit (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 28 March 2011 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

xpost Oh dear. :-(((

Nathalie (stevienixed), Monday, 28 March 2011 19:59 (fifteen years ago)

you are treating the person outside the marriage like some sort of second-string player, and also, it maybe glosses over the fact that an emotional attachment could develop, making staying loyal to your husband or wife difficult.

the lovely emma b stresses that cheating isn't a good thing to have happen. but i think she'd say (i haven't asked her this specifically) that she's really talking about one or two night stands. if a (more) emotional attachment does develop and you find it difficult to stay loyal to your husband or wife you have to make a decision to stay or go.

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 00:21 (fifteen years ago)

oh and as far as second-string status goes yes that's one way of putting it! there's a flipside to being "second" though in that you are never going to have to put up with the quotidian bullshit that the cheater's s.o. does. if that tradeoff doesn't appeal then for god's sake don't hook up with someone who's already in a relationship.

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 00:24 (fifteen years ago)

I had a friend once who was dating this girl (whom he's now marrying in August, she's in her early twenties, he's about 35), and then started talking again to a girl he almost hooked up with months earlier, obviously wanting to get back w/ her. when the girl (rightly) questioned wasn't he seeing someone, his reply was "I don't have any rings on these fingers".

^^^^^^ wrong way to handle temptation.

try our rebecca black-ened chicken, it's fun FUN FUN (San Te), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 00:26 (fifteen years ago)

kinda wish someone steadfastly referred to me as the lovely mookie p

mookieproof, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 00:28 (fifteen years ago)

aw<3

the wistful mookie p

estela, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 00:42 (fifteen years ago)

i can call u that mook but maybe that's not what you mean :)

VegemiteGrrl, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 01:15 (fifteen years ago)

xxp - how about cute?

sarahel, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 03:19 (fifteen years ago)

uh those are all awesome

/blushes

mookieproof, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 03:29 (fifteen years ago)

:D

VegemiteGrrl, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 03:29 (fifteen years ago)

You are the lovely mookie p!

Borads of Candida (Trayce), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 05:56 (fifteen years ago)

I don't have any rings on these fingers"

That is so insanely wrong.

Nathalie (stevienixed), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 11:11 (fifteen years ago)

Yes, the correct response is "you mean THAT old bag??"

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 11:27 (fifteen years ago)

someone i know told me a hopeless story about how he'd once had a very lovely girlfriend he lived with but he went out one night and got unbelievably horribly drunk and hooked up with an exciting new random stranger girl and was about to go home with her when his girlfriend arrived at the pub looking for him and he didn't want to mess things up with the exciting new random stranger girl so when his girlfriend came over to talk to them he introduced her to the random stranger girl as his cousin.

estela, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 11:49 (fifteen years ago)

@nathalie -- it is. the other girl didn't reciprocate because she A. had a boyfriend, but B. thought it was a shitty thing to say.

the friend in question is now marrying the girl he almost cheated on. so I guess he grew up?

San Te, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 11:51 (fifteen years ago)

Aka "Constanza style"

xpost

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 11:52 (fifteen years ago)

i suppose it was quite a constanza thing to do, i was told the story pre-costanza so i've never made that connection.

i think i could actually forgive someone who was as stupid at being crafty as that, it is not the work of a cunning deceiver.

estela, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 12:02 (fifteen years ago)

if you dumped them you would miss out on revisiting it whenever you felt like it and laughing anew at how thick they were.

estela, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 12:05 (fifteen years ago)

lmao @ that story

they reminisce over dayo (D-40), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 12:12 (fifteen years ago)

what an ass

I dont see no rings on these fingers - eddie murphy raw meme, tbf

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 13:18 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, my gf says that to me all the time, see also 'what have you done for me lately' and 'i want half'

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 13:20 (fifteen years ago)

so i cheat

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 13:29 (fifteen years ago)

hahahaha

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 13:30 (fifteen years ago)

yeeaaaaaaaa....just keepin it on the downlow

San Te, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 13:36 (fifteen years ago)

you cheat with dudes?

sarahel, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 18:28 (fifteen years ago)

me and some other dudes cheat in a pack, yes. just prowlin, u know

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

nah, like "being on the downlow" is slang around here for guys (mostly African-American) that have wives/girlfriends but get it on with guys on the side. It's actually a major public health concern in terms of the spread of AIDS.

sarahel, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

i am informed and appalled

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:01 (fifteen years ago)

It reminds me of that Babycakes song.

Mark G, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

nah, like "being on the downlow" is slang around here for guys (mostly African-American) that have wives/girlfriends but get it on with guys on the side. It's actually a major public health concern in terms of the spread of AIDS.

― sarahel, Tuesday, March 29, 2011 2:59 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark

Yeah, I think it's slang for that everywhere tbh.

ENBB, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

Oh you meant here as opposed to Ireland - oops - sorry!

ENBB, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

oh, i was actually curious whether it was just a Bay Area thing, so, that was totally appreciated!

sarahel, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:15 (fifteen years ago)

in ireland, the equivalent term is 'GAA player'

kid 606: the nultness (nakhchivan), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah def not just a bay area thing at all.

ENBB, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:19 (fifteen years ago)

lol

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:22 (fifteen years ago)

It has been the subject of a law and order episode or three, iirc.

kkvgz, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

Lol I was making TLC "Creep" joke :(

San Te, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:49 (fifteen years ago)

I got it :)

VegemiteGrrl, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

well so did everyone else, seeing as it was just slang for "cheating with discretion" when it first appeared

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gd2NBZ_apg0

omar little, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.gifsoup.com/webroot/animatedgifs3/1547088_o.gif

omar little, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:55 (fifteen years ago)

as much as i enjoy ilxors anthropologizing abt the african american community, the "down low" as a unique or new phenomenon is a myth

http://www.slate.com/id/2161452/

max, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:57 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.villagevoice.com/2004-08-03/news/sex-lies-death/

max, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:57 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, the whole concept is problematic for a number of reasons

ENBB, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 19:59 (fifteen years ago)

i dunno if anyone here is saying that it is unique or new, Max

sarahel, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

the uniqueness of this new phenomenon is compelling

omar little, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

lol

ENBB, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

we're all just catching to the slang the use in Oakland is all

gr8080, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

okay, what if i just said, "the down low" doesnt exist, also, it's a stupid thing to talk about on this thread

max, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

why is it stupid, max?

sarahel, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

if the phrase "the down low" doesn't exist, how did you type that post

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

gaa 'players'

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

xp djp bringin science

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

because its an essentially nonexistent phenomenon with racially problematic overtones that was brought up as the punchline of a bad joke? i dunno, why is it not stupid, sarahel?

max, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

extremely dubious science

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

lol Dan

VegemiteGrrl, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down_Low_%28Nobody_Has_to_Know%29

so sad this song isn't real

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

why isn't it stupid? Because STDs often come with cheating?

sarahel, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:08 (fifteen years ago)

so I creep
yeaaah
just keepin' it on the down low
'cuz STDs often come with cheating

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:09 (fifteen years ago)

sarahel you are hilarious

goole, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:09 (fifteen years ago)

ok now i guess we're at the point in this thread where people can start quoting Anal Cunt lyrics.

sarahel, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

i just want to read a thread on ilx without utterly useless aggressively unfunny 40-post digressions springing from awful jokes

max, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

not just awful jokes, springing from explanations for those awful jokes

max, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

or 40 post complaints about those awful jokes

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think you actually want read ILX, then

'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

was gonna say

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

so then you guys are cheating on the purpose of this thread

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:13 (fifteen years ago)

well, when STDs are involved, the partner in crime is definitely to blame too

sarahel, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

i meta going to affair

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

this is what stinky taint does to normally respectable ILXors

San Te, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

'stinky taint' is an STD or what

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

they probably call it something else in Ireland

sarahel, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:16 (fifteen years ago)

all std's are just known as 'the curse'

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

I prefer "original sin"

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 20:17 (fifteen years ago)

in australia they call it INXS
urg bad joke sorry

VegemiteGrrl, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 21:00 (fifteen years ago)

ha!

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 21:02 (fifteen years ago)

:/

VegemiteGrrl, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 21:32 (fifteen years ago)

nah, like "being on the downlow" is slang around here for guys (mostly African-American) that have wives/girlfriends but get it on with guys on the side. It's actually a major public health concern in terms of the spread of AIDS.

― sarahel, Tuesday, March 29, 2011 11:59 AM (2 hours ago)

way late to this but would like to nominate this as one of the worst posts to ILX in recent years (ever?)

jesus...

City of Jorts (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

why? I've heard the term used (incorrectly) by students too.

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

Typical paranoia boogeyman shit.

City of Jorts (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

This is all San Te's fault. Or maybe TLC? I dont know. This thread got real weird real quick.

VegemiteGrrl, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 21:59 (fifteen years ago)

anyway, cheaters are disgusting savages

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 22:01 (fifteen years ago)

you mean pro-Qaddaffi supporters, Shakes.

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 22:02 (fifteen years ago)

right. they should all be shot.

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 22:04 (fifteen years ago)

technically I'm at fault cuz I started this thread :(

San Te, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 22:08 (fifteen years ago)

J'ACCUSE!!

VegemiteGrrl, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 22:11 (fifteen years ago)

has anyone posted this? i love it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_oNzk1q8F8

gr8080, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

wait I thought people who dont bag their own groceries are disgusting savages. /confusef

VegemiteGrrl, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

way late to this but would like to nominate this as one of the worst posts to ILX in recent years (ever?)

jesus...

― City of Jorts (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, March 29, 2011 5:46 PM (36 minutes ago) Bookmark

not even one of the ten worst posts in this thread

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 22:26 (fifteen years ago)

what's funny is the thread started from a discussion as to whether the accomplice was at fault too and morphed into just a generic discussion on whether cheating is forgivable or not.

San Te, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 22:27 (fifteen years ago)

not funny in a 'ha ha' sense but funny in a 'jesus fucking christ, ILX!!!' sense

San Te, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 22:27 (fifteen years ago)

TS, a board in which discussions are neatly filed under accurate topic descriptions, or a board in which there is lively and fluid debate?

Confused Turtle (Zora), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 22:30 (fifteen years ago)

let me know when you find a board that fits either description

San Te, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 22:31 (fifteen years ago)

steve shasta, glad to see you and i are in agreement about this

max, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 22:38 (fifteen years ago)

I got zinged, DID YOU SEE?

Also unknown as Zora (Surfing At Work), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 23:29 (fifteen years ago)

It's a fair point I just don't find it surprising or bothersome as long as it's interesting and doesn't totally dissolve into zing-trading and meta-analysis (I'll STFU now).

Also unknown as Zora (Surfing At Work), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 23:33 (fifteen years ago)

wasn't really a zing on you so much as it was ILX. idk this thread hasn't been horrible but it's kinda de-evolved into people saying the painfully obvious and people either aligning themselves in the "black and white" or "grey" camps when it comes to ethics of cheating.

San Te, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 23:34 (fifteen years ago)

i thought the thread had become "tips for cheaters"

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 23:38 (fifteen years ago)

has someone written that book btw? they should

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 23:39 (fifteen years ago)

I'd never be able to get away with it because I'm the worst liar in existence

San Te, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 23:39 (fifteen years ago)

It's because I have a tell when I'm lying

San Te, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 23:39 (fifteen years ago)

My face

San Te, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 23:39 (fifteen years ago)

this thread hasn't been horrible but it's kinda de-evolved into people saying the painfully obvious and people either aligning themselves in the "black and white" or "grey" camps

So people either have one opinion or some other opinion, in other words? Like um... well, yes.

Borads of Candida (Trayce), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 23:51 (fifteen years ago)

I mean come on, what a non-sentence.

Borads of Candida (Trayce), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 23:52 (fifteen years ago)

haw

Преве́д LIVE (electricsound), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 23:53 (fifteen years ago)

h8 the concept of 'the downlow' bcuz racist but also because it ruined the connotations of one of my fav kells songs

they reminisce over dayo (D-40), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 23:57 (fifteen years ago)

you're forgetting the camp that need to control discussion on ilx in order to have fun

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Tuesday, 29 March 2011 23:58 (fifteen years ago)

When did the spirit of Urizen take over here, seriously?

Publicidad de Sexo (Abbbottt), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:02 (fifteen years ago)

i dont really give a shit if a thread gets derailed, i would just prefer derails to be funny/interesting/fruitful in some way, instead of unfunny water-treading garbage

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:04 (fifteen years ago)

oh man i told a dude i know to keep it on the downlow because of a secret i shared with him but little did i know it was going to give him AIDS and turn him black :/

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:05 (fifteen years ago)

remember when all ilx threads/derails were funny interesting and fruitful?

Feel a nostalgic ad comin on

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:07 (fifteen years ago)

"keep it on the hush"

"by which i mean felching"

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:07 (fifteen years ago)

max =

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Xr5X6W0jVko/TT2tPuWOr_I/AAAAAAAAAIk/782nRl_xcr0/s1600/Internet_police.jpg

San Te, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:09 (fifteen years ago)

"say nuthin to nobody"

Brit term for 'come in my armpit'

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:09 (fifteen years ago)

@Trayce my point was that the discussion had nothing to do with the original point of the thread or even the revive!

i s'pose I don't care at this point.

San Te, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:09 (fifteen years ago)

am i the only dude that didn't know of the completely RONG and dumb alternate meaning of 'down low' prior to today?

like idk how the hell something that stupid even came into existence

San Te, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:11 (fifteen years ago)

i dont understand why people are defending the down-low derail

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:19 (fifteen years ago)

x-post Idk dude I'm sorta afraid to have a discussion about that here now because Max will just get his panties in a twist again.

ENBB, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:19 (fifteen years ago)

xp Racism and biphobia.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:20 (fifteen years ago)

can we talk about cheating now?

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:21 (fifteen years ago)

xxpost max is http://soulsurfer.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/taking-a-stand.jpg

San Te, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:21 (fifteen years ago)

i actually would be fine with a smart discussion about the myth of the "down low" in any thread, i am just not interested in a lot of bad jokes and posts-for-postings-sake

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:21 (fifteen years ago)

k can we thread ban max pls

San Te, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:22 (fifteen years ago)

seriously all i am asking is that people take 30 seconds before they hit "submit post" and ask themselves honestly, "is this post contributing anything of value to this discussion"

i understand this is a lot to ask but ilx is a group project and we all need to be at the top of our game

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:22 (fifteen years ago)

max have you ever cheated?

If so, why?

If you cheated, was it 'on the down-low?'

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:23 (fifteen years ago)

max plz dont taze us

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:25 (fifteen years ago)

thread coppin

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:27 (fifteen years ago)

bbl guyz, can't wait to see the next 273 posts

San Te, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:28 (fifteen years ago)

oh so now you leave?

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:30 (fifteen years ago)

seriously all i am asking is that people take 30 seconds before they hit "submit post" and ask themselves honestly, "is this post contributing anything of value to this discussion"

You realize you've shut down this site.

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:32 (fifteen years ago)

xp San asked a question, and I answered it. That's all.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:32 (fifteen years ago)

I left cuz I am goin to a movie. But now I am waiting in line

San Te, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:50 (fifteen years ago)

h8 the concept of 'the downlow' bcuz racist but also because it ruined the connotations of one of my fav kells songs

I heard about the gay black down low from Sally Jesse Raphael around the same time or earlier than the Kells song

lol wikip contributor trying to sound authoritative though: "This song, along with TLC's smash hit "Creep" and Brian McKnight's "On The Down Low" incorporates the down low situation in regard to men sleeping around with married women."

Neo Tony (sic), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 00:51 (fifteen years ago)

so Boz Scaggs "Low Down" is a whole other thing right?

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 01:04 (fifteen years ago)

Yea that's about getting a Fr0thy Walrus from someone

San Te, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 01:09 (fifteen years ago)

;_;

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 01:13 (fifteen years ago)

I DONT EVEN WANT TO... WHAT THE.

Borads of Candida (Trayce), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 03:39 (fifteen years ago)

commence retinal scrubbing in 3 2 1...

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 03:42 (fifteen years ago)

dirty San Chez

Преве́д LIVE (electricsound), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 03:45 (fifteen years ago)

because its an essentially nonexistent phenomenon with racially problematic overtones that was brought up as the punchline of a bad joke?

― max, Tuesday, March 29, 2011 8:06 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

A fascinating CDC study published last year specifically looked at men who have sex with men and do not disclose their sexual orientation versus those who do disclose. The study recruited participants from only six gay bars (which already tilts the results away from DL men who may not go to gay bars), but the findings were startling. More black men were nondisclosers (18 percent)—that is, on the DL—than white men (8 percent), and all nondisclosures reported having more sex with women than with men.

http://www.slate.com/id/2108724/

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 08:06 (fifteen years ago)

"based on our study of six gay bars, more bisexual white men are out of the closet than bisexual black men. and latino men. and racially mixed men. and asian/pacific islander men."

conclusive proof that the "down-low" exists as a unique phenomenon in the black community and a major driving force in the spread of hiv/aids

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 08:31 (fifteen years ago)

AFAIK it's the only study on the subject.

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 08:45 (fifteen years ago)

I agree it doesn't have a significant effect on hiv/aids transmission rates. But how can you say the DL phenomenon is "essentially nonexistent" when the only piece of evidence referenced in your links actually supports it?

Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 08:49 (fifteen years ago)

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v134/tracerhand/12304045985t78.gif

40% chill and 100% negative (Tracer Hand), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 10:52 (fifteen years ago)

there's a flipside to being "second" though in that you are never going to have to put up with the quotidian bullshit that the cheater's s.o. does. if that tradeoff doesn't appeal then for god's sake don't hook up with someone who's already in a relationship.

Now you tell me (j/k).

Seriously though, I think it's rare for two people to have the same level of disinterest in a situation like this . . . or maybe you all just lead very uncomplicated lives . . .

If I was ever married, and did ever cheat (two very big ifs), I can't imagine it would be for anything other than an emotional reason . . . it's not like I would be trawling the local bars or youth soccer games looking for something on the side.

Virginia Plain, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 14:03 (fifteen years ago)

I agree it doesn't have a significant effect on hiv/aids transmission rates. But how can you say the DL phenomenon is "essentially nonexistent" when the only piece of evidence referenced in your links actually supports it?

― Matt Armstrong, Wednesday, March 30, 2011 4:49 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

well what is "the down-low phenomenon" exactly? (remember that as a media phenomenon it has its genesis with j.l. kings sensationalist book, which specifically charged men "on the down low" with being the cause of high hiv/aids rates among african-americans and which has evolved into a mini-empire for him including the dvd "Top 10 Signs of Down Low Behavior and More…") is it just black men having sex with other men without identifying publicly or openly as gay? if thats all it is, why is it a "phenomenon"? men of all races and ethnicities have sex with other men without openly or publicly identifying as gay or bisexual, and have been for millions of years. is it black men having sex with other men without identifying publicly or openly as gay at significantly higher rates than men of other races or ethnicities? this seems like the strongest case, but again, im not convinced by a survey of 6 gay bars that still finds high rates (14%, 13% and 10%, respectively) for mixed-race, hispanic and asian/pacific islander men, and im further unconvinced by a lack of historical data that would allow us to see "the down low" as something new or historically unique.

but even if those things are the definition youre shooting for, the biggest problem with "the down-low phenomenon" is that, thanks to JL king and articles in the NYT magazine and elsewhere, "down-low" is irrevocably associated with hiv/aids transmission rates. (note that when sarahel was trying to explain it, she specifically brought up the hiv/aids connection). there is, as the slate article notes, absolutely no evidence that men who dont identify as gay but have sex with other men are responsible for elevated hiv/aids rates among african-americans.

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 15:15 (fifteen years ago)

i mentioned the hiv/aids connection because the articles i read about it were about AIDS and how transmission rates and new cases were increasing in the African-American population.

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

right, exactly

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 17:32 (fifteen years ago)

and they were partially from the standpoint of shifting blame that had traditionally been placed on the out gay community

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 17:35 (fifteen years ago)

the articles i read were less focused on the "dangerous black buck" stereotype than "macho black dudes have conflicted feelings about homosexuality"

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 17:37 (fifteen years ago)

max i feel you're glossing over a major point in that downlow is (supposedly) happening among black men already in committed heterosexual relationships...the theory is to support the trend that most new contractors of HIV are African-American women...do you have an alternate theory as to why these women are getting AIDS?

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

like, I don't have any problem calling it out as the urban legend it may or may not be, but your problems with the discussion on this thread are nonsensical at best

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

or is your issue that it's singling out African-Americans as opposed to including all races?

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 17:45 (fifteen years ago)

do you have an alternate theory as to why these women are getting AIDS?

CIA is responsible

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 17:50 (fifteen years ago)

spoken like a true San Francisco resident, Shakey!

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 17:51 (fifteen years ago)

i think saying, even if you buy the study, that "black men are 10% more likely to be nondisclosers" is very different from buying into the "down low trend" or whatever sociological idea that number is supposed to express. it's about how these ideas are communicated, and the other nasty things they carry along with them.

ryan, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

so black women will only contract aids if there's secret faggotry involved?

wtf u people

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

(have we passed clusterfuck status yet?)

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

no but we're getting there...drive-by denouncings are always a big sign

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:05 (fifteen years ago)

i agree that there are nasty connotations involved in the issue and the way it's sometimes presented, but it would really suck to get AIDS from your partner who got it through cheating on you. Like the pain of being cheated on is bad enough, but getting an STD in the bargain?

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:05 (fifteen years ago)

Time to bring Baptist religion into this?

James Woods, Hysterical Realism (Eazy), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

Elmo nobody said that!

Non-disclosure about homosexual activity by male partners is a problem regardless of race but it does happen at slightly higher rates among certain ethnic groups. I think the main problem with the whole down low thing is that it was blown out of proportion by the media and black males were made to seem far more likely to engage in such activity than any other group which wasn't really backed up by hard data.

ENBB, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

gee, wonder why that was

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:07 (fifteen years ago)

yeah well :(

ENBB, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:08 (fifteen years ago)

max totally otm itt but that doesn't mean a culturual group cant have its own term for something that's been happening as long as there have been men and women

gr8080, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

AIDS was kinda a game changer

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:10 (fifteen years ago)

enbb i was responding to this:

the theory is to support the trend that most new contractors of HIV are African-American women...do you have an alternate theory as to why these women are getting AIDS?

"alternate theory" hmmm yes let's see

maybe they got it from their hetero partner who contracted it from ... ANOTHER HIV+ WOMAN!

seriously i would have expected the AIDS = GAY correlation to be subject to a little more critical thought, but the feigned cluelessness of "how else could it happen?" just adds homophobia on top of the ugly racist overtones

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:10 (fifteen years ago)

i was under the impression that it's more difficult for a woman to transmit HIV to a male than vice versa?

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

that is true

ENBB, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

^^^this is true and statistically proven fwiw (says a guy who used to do non-profit HIV work)

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

Elmo yes I see what you're getting at and it is annoying, I agree.

The fact remains though that at least from a medical/scientific point of view anal intercourse is a way more effective means of transmitting HIV than PIV intercourse. Being the insertive partner in het sex carries a very small risk of infection.

putting this up here now before someone jumps down my throat but continuing . . .

ENBB, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

what about being the insertive partner in anal intercourse?

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:15 (fifteen years ago)

i thought it was the case that the person on the receiving end was the one who was most likely to be on the receiving end disease-wise?

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:16 (fifteen years ago)

ok so if that's true about the transmission rates (and i'll concede that) then at least be accurate and say "vaginal sex" if that's what you mean. str8 ppl have buttsex too.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

So if straight black women are getting HIV at much higher rates than white (or any other) women, there has to be another explanation. Given that anal sex is far riskier and also that men who identify as straight but have gay sex may be less likely to use protection while doing so the down low thing sort of made/makes sense and I get why it caught on but a far likelier explanation is that certain STIs increase the risk of transmitting HIV and that blacks may likely have higher rates of these STIs than whites due to restricted access to health care.

ENBB, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

x-post - You're totally right. PIV intercourse = "Penis in vagina" intercourse which I should have used throughout.

ENBB, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

sounds sexier that way

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

max i feel you're glossing over a major point in that downlow is (supposedly) happening among black men already in committed heterosexual relationships...the theory is to support the trend that most new contractors of HIV are African-American women...do you have an alternate theory as to why these women are getting AIDS?

― Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, March 30, 2011 1:41 PM (34 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

alternate theories AND admissions that there is flat-out no data to support the down-low theory can be found in this slate article (http://www.slate.com/id/2108724/) as well as the articles i linked to above:

as much as i enjoy ilxors anthropologizing abt the african american community, the "down low" as a unique or new phenomenon is a myth

http://www.slate.com/id/2161452/

― max, Tuesday, March 29, 2011 3:57 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

http://www.villagevoice.com/2004-08-03/news/sex-lies-death/

― max, Tuesday, March 29, 2011 3:57 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

i thought it was the case that the person on the receiving end was the one who was most likely to be on the receiving end disease-wise?

― sarahel, Wednesday, March 30, 2011 2:16 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

That's correct, yeah.

ENBB, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

"The muddy truth is that the high rate of HIV infection and AIDS among African American women is due to a combination of all these factors. "It's a perfect storm of issues," says NIH's Cargill."

how intriguing, that a public health phenomenon is attributable to a number of different socioeconomic factors and not sexxy str8 black guys banging other dudes on the side

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

thanks, ENBB -- because str8 people also have buttsecks

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

i think saying, even if you buy the study, that "black men are 10% more likely to be nondisclosers" is very different from buying into the "down low trend" or whatever sociological idea that number is supposed to express. it's about how these ideas are communicated, and the other nasty things they carry along with them.

― ryan, Wednesday, March 30, 2011 1:56 PM (25 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

anyway, this is a much better and more succinct version of what i have been trying to get at in my muddled posts

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

I need to find more straight friends who admit to enjoying buttsex; it's one of those phenomena I read about but have never encountered.

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

There should be a Law & Order episode about someone who gets killed while arguing about the validity of "down low" on the internet.

kkvgz, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

sarahel are you just being defensive after being called out or are you actually arguing that secret faggots cause all aids

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

To be honest, I was a bit shocked at the vehemence of the responses yesterday – and I'm gay!

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

hey listen I have zero horses in this race; I just heard of 'the downlow' yesterday and am absolutely no expert on this. My point was mostly in relation to max who was holding up sarhel's op on the subject as some sort of epitome of thoughtless racism on ILX (something I had called out earlier): basically the impression I got (from this thread) was that the statistical trend towards African-American women testing HIV-positive and that the downlow became posited as the main reason for this.

If it turns out to be a myth, I'm more than happy with that. I just thought max was being kind of a shitbag to sarahel for taking it at face value...

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

what? I was just asking about whether the transmission risk is more significant to the bottom (in anal sex) than the top in order to separate the issue from gender/orientation!

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:29 (fifteen years ago)

uh i didnt accuse sarahel of being racist

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:29 (fifteen years ago)

I can't speak for sarahel but I, personally, am actually arguing that secret faggots cause all aids

blapsolutely (absolutely clean glasses), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:29 (fifteen years ago)

So, basically, if hypothetical cheating dude is transmitting AIDS to his wife/gf, then he's most likely being banged than doing the banging.

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:30 (fifteen years ago)

i also linked out to several articles supporting my claims

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:30 (fifteen years ago)

I don't even know why the fuck I'm reading this friend; I've never been in a committed relationship and haven't had sex with anybody in years...

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

i appreciate the fact that you are now attempting to explain your position and discussing the issue as opposed to just calling me stupid, max.

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

ugh i am being super-reactive about this issue because of various personal reasons right now -- not trying to troll here but honestly

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

I would just like to say that the whole DL thing is still used and referred to a lot on popular media and public health campaigns. Love you Max but I think you were sorta harsh yesterday with the whole OMG WHAT?! DON'T YOU KNOW THAT'S RACIST??? thing because I actually don't think that's really that widely known but yet you made it seem like it was completely idiotic for Sarahel to mention.

ENBB, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

whoops I meant Steve Shast; I'm v sorry max

nah, like "being on the downlow" is slang around here for guys (mostly African-American) that have wives/girlfriends but get it on with guys on the side. It's actually a major public health concern in terms of the spread of AIDS.

― sarahel, Tuesday, March 29, 2011 11:59 AM (2 hours ago)

way late to this but would like to nominate this as one of the worst posts to ILX in recent years (ever?)

jesus...

― City of Jorts (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, March 29, 2011 5:46 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

That's just Shasta being Shasta. Nobody takes him seriously.

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

(elmo - I thought immediately of those factors from your borad thread update - I can completely see why this is really sensitive right now)

ENBB, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

I would just like to say that the whole DL thing is still used and referred to a lot on popular media and public health campaigns. Love you Max but I think you were sorta harsh yesterday with the whole OMG WHAT?! DON'T YOU KNOW THAT'S RACIST??? thing because I actually don't think that's really that widely known but yet you made it seem like it was completely idiotic for Sarahel to mention.

^^^ this

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:33 (fifteen years ago)

and I live in Ground Zero!

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:33 (fifteen years ago)

ugh sorry I'm all sorts of rong today

cheating partner in a committed relationship >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Drugs A. Money

bye folx

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:33 (fifteen years ago)

can i just be clear that my #1 problem with the "downlow" post was not the racial weirdness or wrongness, it was that it was a BAD JOKE, and that, even worse, a second post was created to EXPLAIN THE BAD JOKE. that was what my anger is/was about. i dont care if you guys believe in the down low though i did link to articles about why its a myth and felt like i was pretty calm about it all day ywesterday.

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

hey, thanks for having my back, dude!

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

this is all san te's fault, let's not forget

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

xp - dude you were so not calm about it.

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

It seemed to me that you were basically calling her a moron for bringing it up at all when, as it turns out, a large number of ppl in this thread had never even heard of the damn thing let alone any of its criticisms.

ENBB, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

like rereading my posts i am wondering if maybe my tone doesnt come across wrong like when i said this "as much as i enjoy ilxors anthropologizing abt the african american community" it was in jest and when i said this "because its an essentially nonexistent phenomenon with racially problematic overtones that was brought up as the punchline of a bad joke?" the focus should be on "punchline of a bad joke" btw those were the only two posts where i even brought up race

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

You weren't very calm, you were using italics and stuff, it was pretty aggro and weird.

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:36 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i dunno maybe we all just read stuff in a different way but i am rereading my posts from yesterday and im not really getting a "OMG WHAT?! DON'T YOU KNOW THAT'S RACIST???" vibe from them, really at all

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:36 (fifteen years ago)

btw i dont even think hype about "the down low phenomenon" is "racist" as such and i certainly dont think people who read about it and think its true are racist either

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

i didn't even realize it was a "hyped" thing!

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

I was just spending the whole time trying to divert ppl back to the early/mid-90s usage of the term "down-low", since that was the context under which it came up in the first place

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

well wahtever you want to call it then

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

i remember what max seemed most animated about was this thread becoming unfunnily off-topic.

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

like, if the articles I read in local papers were a result of the agenda-setting of some book, I was totally unaware of it.

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

in retrospect it is just easier to blame San Te

wtf, man

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

san te u suck dude, sb'd u for all this

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

djp otm

ENBB, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

what's going on? did san te ruin being gay for everyone?

Bleeqwot the Chef (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

maybe i'm unrepresentative, but i thought it was widely known that the "DL" thing was both a big media phenomenon AND had been called into question as an actual health phenomenon

goole, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:44 (fifteen years ago)

nope

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:46 (fifteen years ago)

in that "widely known" to ilxors is never really a good metric for measuring how widely known something actually is

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:47 (fifteen years ago)

well yeah

goole, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:47 (fifteen years ago)

being on the down low is the chillwave of sexual identity then?

Bleeqwot the Chef (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:48 (fifteen years ago)

seems like part of the trouble here is that as slang, "the down low" is a phrase used by tons of people to talk about anything secret or hush-hush, and it kind of floats independently of the facts surrounding the media demonizing and panic-mongering

like everybody who has heard the TLC song is pretty much licensed to throw around the phrase "down low" and it fits lotsa straight adultery and other shenanigans too

i have kicked it w some white dudes who were on the DL btw

the tune is space, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

maybe i'm unrepresentative, but i thought it was widely known that the "DL" thing was both a big media phenomenon AND had been called into question as an actual health phenomenon

― goole, Wednesday, March 30, 2011 2:44 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark

I had no idea that it'd been 'debunked' and was perfectly willing to accept it at face value a la sarahel

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:50 (fifteen years ago)

Down low, on the QT, and very hush hush.

kkvgz, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

well, what is one ta-nehisi coates against an oprah

xp

goole, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

well the "DL" is most definitely a thing, as dr d suggests: there are plenty of straight-identifying men out there who have sex with men. they're just not all black. the 'popular' supposition that the DL is predominantly an african-american thing probably has roots in similarly 'popular' conceptions/stereotypes of african-american masculinity and culture in general, imo.

i mean there's a reason that public health literature talks about MSM (men who have sex with men) and not, say, 'homosexuals.'

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:54 (fifteen years ago)

the preponderance of "they act str8 but they are really gay" explanations that get thrown at this phenom from both conservative and gay-positive sides sound weirdly like a consensus- there must be at least some relationships where the female partner knows that her guy is also into other guys and they have an understanding about it

i.e. seems like bisexuality is the "vanishing middle" in a lot of these discussion of the DL thing

I don't feel this way, but a lot of gay people of my generation (late 30s) tend to want to debunk bisexuality as just a failure-to-come-out- but is this changing now for younger people?

the tune is space, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:57 (fifteen years ago)

oops xpost

the tune is space, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:57 (fifteen years ago)

the 'popular' supposition that the DL is predominantly an african-american thing probably has roots in similarly 'popular' conceptions/stereotypes of african-american masculinity and culture in general, imo.

you're probably right

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:57 (fifteen years ago)

I've seen more casual indifference to homosexuality as a repugnant thing than sexual experimentation.

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

anecdotally: yes. xp to tunes

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

my male students admit to having gay best friends all the time, when a few years ago it startled me.

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 18:59 (fifteen years ago)

Wait, have we talked about prison yet?

James Woods, Hysterical Realism (Eazy), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:00 (fifteen years ago)

and there's also the issue of the privilege of privacy when it comes to public health, and because in America, it's almost impossible to neatly separate economic class from race, you sometimes end up with "African-Americans" being used to represent "low income people"

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:01 (fifteen years ago)

I don't feel this way, but a lot of gay people of my generation (late 30s) tend to want to debunk bisexuality as just a failure-to-come-out-

These people are so annoying.

kkvgz, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:01 (fifteen years ago)

kinda think that 'sex positivity' and/or identifying as 'queer' might be replacing 'bi' as, like, a thing.

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:02 (fifteen years ago)

I don't feel this way, but a lot of gay people of my generation (late 30s) tend to want to debunk bisexuality as just a failure-to-come-out- but is this changing now for younger people?

― the tune is space, Wednesday, March 30, 2011 2:57 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark

I think young people have always had delusions about bisexuality

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

i've heard young (sub-25) ppl dismiss bisexuality as a stupid, restrictive category, and pull that "i'm just into whoever i'm into, you know?" card. my gf thinks chicks are hot, and has hooked up with them before, but would never identify as 'bi.' why? no idea. but i've heard the same sentiment expressed from others (mostly in her peer group---art kids who screw a lot).

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:06 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, "queer" is a more popular term now.

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:07 (fifteen years ago)

I've seen more casual indifference to homosexuality as a repugnant thing than sexual experimentation.

― Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, March 30, 2011 2:58 PM (8 minutes ago) Bookmark

I'm sorry Alfred; I'm trying to parse this and can't?

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

you can probably trace it by looking at the history of acronyms of college student groups

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:08 (fifteen years ago)

yup.

xpost: he's saying "changing attitudes haven't led to more experimentation, just less out and out homophobia"

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

I don't feel this way, but a lot of gay people of my generation (late 30s) tend to want to debunk bisexuality as just a failure-to-come-out-

These people are so annoying.

― kkvgz, Wednesday, March 30, 2011 3:01 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark

^agreed, esp when they fall back on "studies"

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

xp to gbx thanx!

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

personally think dan savage has a lot to do with it, tbh.

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:09 (fifteen years ago)

Every bisex person is a liar

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:10 (fifteen years ago)

I'm sorry Alfred; I'm trying to parse this and can't?

It came out a bit garbled, but gbx got it.

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:10 (fifteen years ago)

Every bisex person is a liar

^^^ better than "Frankie Says: Relax" as a T-shirt slogan.

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:11 (fifteen years ago)

u trolling tamtam or what?

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:12 (fifteen years ago)

No, just stating a belief that I hold.

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:12 (fifteen years ago)

in that: he's 'normalized' kinks and experimentation, to an extent. i think that in the past it was "if you experiment a little too frequently, you're basically just a homo and you should get over concealing it" and so ppl had to be "bisexual." but that in itself suggests that ppl that are "bi" are actually ambisexual: they could go either way. when, at least ime, it seems that a lot of the 'queers' i've hung around with are like "well i'm mostly into ____ but there are times i could hit it with ____"

less of an orientation and more of a general outlook on sexual activity, "if it feels good, do it," etc, i dunno

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

pretty much "i'm into who i'm into, and i'll be into them if they let me"

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:15 (fifteen years ago)

I was thinking it was Frankie Say and indeed it is!

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4f/Frankie_says_relax_t-shirt.jpg/200px-Frankie_says_relax_t-shirt.jpg

James Woods, Hysterical Realism (Eazy), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

tho i kind of agree with tam tam, to an extent. most of the ppl that i've met who have actually stated their sexuality as "bisexual" actually do seem more confused than anything---as if stating openly that they're 'bisexual' will get ppl off their cases while they figure stuff out. whereas the ppl i've met that have copped to enjoying experimentation or w/e usually identify as straight or gay, and p universally as 'sex positive.'

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

I think my wife would love to have a word with TamTam. Nothing infuriates her more than someone telling her she is a "liar" or "selfish" for being bisexual.

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

I'd love to make your lying wife furious!

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:19 (fifteen years ago)

don't you see jon vc--all girls are naturally bi. Studies say so!

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:19 (fifteen years ago)

I get mad too, when people lie to me

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:19 (fifteen years ago)

Man forget it, I'm not even willing to get into it about this because I have a feeling people are going to get all aggro on me and I don't want to deal with another round of SBs.

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

remember who yr dealing with, dude

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:22 (fifteen years ago)

Well, yeah, hence my post.

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:22 (fifteen years ago)

don't you see jon vc--all girls are naturally bi. Studies say so!

― Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, March 30, 2011 3:19 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark

this is straight up sarcasm and I am totally on your side john via chi 2.0...that 'Studies say so' is a joke ref to a post I made earlier about annoying ppl who think bisex is a sham.

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

girls who claim to be bisexual are really on the down low and give AIDS to white men imo

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

well lacan sez "sexuality is a hole in truth"

so to talk about desire/sex is always to risk falsifying something anarchic and chaotic

*any* identity is a construction, an ego prop, thus false

dooooooooood

the tune is space, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:25 (fifteen years ago)

im gendercuck. fuck my wife, please.

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:25 (fifteen years ago)

anyway, here's a question more germane to the thread topic: those of you with bi partners, would you be cool with a little same-sex side action on the part of your partner, or is side-action of all kinds verboten?

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

it's been a while since ILX has cited actual intellectial (pseuds or not); kind of nice.

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

that's, like, his job, man

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

Nah, cheating is cheating, no matter what the sex. But, having said that, I guess I might feel like it was slightly less of a betrayal if it was with a girl instead of another guy. I mean, that in and of itself probably deserves some deeper reflection on my part as to why I might feel that way, but I think its true.

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:29 (fifteen years ago)

don't get too wrapped up in it jvc; you're trying to gauge your reaction in a hypothetical situation. That's kind of one of the least likely portals into truth about one's self...

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

Amy Ray or Iggy Pop?

James Woods, Hysterical Realism (Eazy), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

lol – gross

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

anyway, here's a question more germane to the thread topic: those of you with bi partners, would you be cool with a little same-sex side action on the part of your partner, or is side-action of all kinds verboten?

If my wife cheated on me with another woman (she's not bi..............AS FAR AS I KNOW!!) I would definitely feel less hurt, because I can't really compete with a woman. I wouldn't be happy but at least I wouldn't feel like I "wasn't doing my job well enough". Plus there is the potential it could lead to something really awesome. I don't know if I would stay married. I can't say that now. Maybe...possibly...PERHAPS. If she cheated on me with a gorilla, that's a different story.

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:39 (fifteen years ago)

Plus there is the potential it could lead to something really awesome.

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:40 (fifteen years ago)

I don't see what's so awesome about getting dumped

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

you haven't met his wife

congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

frogbs you are a gorilla

I'm totally kidding. Congrats strangers. (Matt P), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

I don't see what's so awesome about getting dumped

Nothing's awesome about it, but if she's gonna cheat, I would much rather it be with another woman. At least there's some possibilty of a "consolation prize", you know what I mean?

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:50 (fifteen years ago)

no. what do you mean?

congratulations (n/a), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

he fixes the cable?

goole, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

yep. you got it

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

dude the odds of a threesome with your wife and her lover are slim to fucking none. and even if it did happen the odds are stacked against you of not cumming in your pants before you got them off.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah! TWO! (thebingo), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:53 (fifteen years ago)

It's the theory of the Morbius, where thread becomes a clusterfuck where thread becomes a clusterfuck where thread becomes a clusterfuck where thread becomes a clusterfuck where thread becomes a clusterfuck where thread becomes a clusterfuck where thread becomes a clusterfuck where thread becomes a clusterfuck

San Te, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

hence the word "potential". if she cheats with another guy, it's frowns all around

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

fuck

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah! TWO! (thebingo), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

i honestly don't think those things happen unless its in a porn.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah! TWO! (thebingo), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:54 (fifteen years ago)

apparently we're going for the literal meaning of 'clusterfuck' today

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:55 (fifteen years ago)

hence the word "potential". if she cheats with another guy, it's frowns all around

― frogbs, Wednesday, March 30, 2011 3:54 PM (35 seconds ago) Bookmark

theres always a devils threesome bro http://i.imgur.com/Zra4p.gif

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:56 (fifteen years ago)

this is just reminding me of the alternate universe episode of Friends when Ross talked his wife into having a threesome

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:57 (fifteen years ago)

This thread took a sudden turn to four chan or something.

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:57 (fifteen years ago)

Hell is other people xxp

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:57 (fifteen years ago)

I wished I had waited until TamTam's post before I posted the literal clusterfuck punchline*

*("oh that was a joke? I just thought it waszzzzzzzzzzzzz")

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 19:58 (fifteen years ago)

i honestly don't think those things happen unless its in a porn.

aha!! but it happened to the same exact friend of mine that I mentioned upthread!! except, it was different. she didn't cheat on him really, BUT she was carrying on a relationship with a woman simutaneously (which apparently he did not really care about), and then IT happened. It's not really bragworthy since the other woman was very much "real life lesbian" but sure enough, these things happen from time to time. There is a chance he just made this all up, but he said it in front of them so it seems legit. Epilogue: he married the bi girl. no idea if they lived happily ever after

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

threeways happen, it's not just in pr0n

the tune is space, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

Threeways happen but are awkward and stilted compared to 2-person sex (IME, YMMV).

Confused Turtle (Zora), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

do they happen when you catch your wife in bed with her friend though?

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

Every person I've ever talked to irl that has had a threeway has said it was a really awkward and relatively unsatisfying experience. And none of them wanted to haev another one.

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

3-way on stilts

that's some Cirque du Soleil shit right there

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

xxp Only if her friend is a real-life lesbian.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

this is right after the topless pillowfight, right

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

xxxp I have absolutely no idea. If it happens to me I will report back to this thread though.

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

lol laurel

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

I learn more about the world every time frogs posts.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:08 (fifteen years ago)

where's steve shasta when you need him?

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:09 (fifteen years ago)

Then we'd really have a threeway!

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

i believe he has four or five hot metal chicks waiting in bed for him

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

Nah he's got a wakeboarding championship coming up.

go peddle your bullshit somewhere else sister (Laurel), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

Back up the lesbian canoe, how did we go from 'Down Low-Gate' to this?

Y'know what, don't tell me, just post pics and we'll call it square....

San Te, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

frogbs: the Geir Hongro of laddism

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

DIBS

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:14 (fifteen years ago)

threeways can be v awk, true, esp. the first few times (and it's deadly if somebody's not really into it or feels left out), but if you have an ongoing thing and all parties are up for it, it can be pretty great too- it's not *always* awkward

the tune is space, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

but should you tip your cheating bisexual threesome partners?

symsymsym, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

and if so, how much?

symsymsym, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

there's a grocery groin joke in there somewhere

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:28 (fifteen years ago)

"real life lesbian"

I lol'd at this. mostly because I have never met a real life lesbian who was actually attractive by hetero standards. which is kind of weird, you'd think there would be at least a couple statistical anomalies - sometimes I think "lipstick lesbians" are a porn myth.

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:31 (fifteen years ago)

My threeway has a first name
It's B-O-N-E-R

San Te, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:31 (fifteen years ago)

mostly because I have never met a real life lesbian who was actually attractive by hetero standards.

wtf?!!!

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

I've met a couple dude. Went with a bunch of lesbians in Lansing to watch one of them win Amateur Night at the local showbar

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

uh really? i definitely know some cute real life lesbians. in real life.

adult music person (Jordan), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

I lol'd at this. mostly because I have never met a real life lesbian who was actually attractive by hetero standards. which is kind of weird, you'd think there would be at least a couple statistical anomalies - sometimes I think "lipstick lesbians" are a porn myth.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, March 30, 2011 3:31 PM (51 seconds ago) Bookmark

wait are you for real? i know some hella cute lesbians

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:32 (fifteen years ago)

I know it sounds jerky but yes I am being totally for real and I have known/been close friends with/am related to a whole bunch of lesbians. it does seem really really odd to me. maybe it's just the lesbians *I* know, I dunno.

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:34 (fifteen years ago)

definitely just you

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

Two of my best friends from high school are bisexual women. One of them is p much best friends with a very attractive lesbian woman--they're the ones I went to the strip club with.

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

this thread just keeps on giving

symsymsym, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:36 (fifteen years ago)

alternate explanation: SF is just full of ugly people lol

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:37 (fifteen years ago)

Actually Shakey, I'm kind of in the same boat. I have seen some attractive ones in nightclubs but I kind of suspected they were just pretending to be lesbos to get attention. All the ones that I have "confirmed" are kind of, well, you said it. That's why I don't think this guy is lying about it. Not that they don't exist period, Portia de Rossi is very much vrooom vrooom

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

wtg Shakes,; you've been otm-ed by frogbs. Real-life lesbians really are the ugs~!

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

loooooooool

It cant it wont it dont stop

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

am resisting turning this into a "hot or not" fest featuring photos of my lesbian friends/acquaintances/relatives

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

wait wtf seriously we're debating whether or not hot lesbians exist?

the tune is space, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

not seriously

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:46 (fifteen years ago)

Well, some of us may be more serious than others.

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:46 (fifteen years ago)

http://flcenterlitarts.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/patricia-highsmith.jpg
would smash

the tune is space, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:47 (fifteen years ago)

btw I only know like 4 of them and they all kind of look like Laurie Anderson

frogbs, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:47 (fifteen years ago)

just thinking about ilxers, there's mandee: she's cute and she's homosexual too!

kkvgz, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:47 (fifteen years ago)

Although we may have moved onto whether or not hot San Franciscans exist, I can't really tell.

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:47 (fifteen years ago)

they're all bi

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:48 (fifteen years ago)

lesbian ilxors, have there ever been any? i can't think of any but there must be/have been some

harlan, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 20:54 (fifteen years ago)

oh man, this thread really is a treat

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:01 (fifteen years ago)

what the hell is going on

mookieproof, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

the last time I checked, ugly lesbians were having a threesome in a canoe

somehow black men spreading AIDS were involved

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:10 (fifteen years ago)

SF is just full of ugly people lol

http://www.jimmyakin.org/images/boomer.jpg

James Woods, Hysterical Realism (Eazy), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:19 (fifteen years ago)

wait why did you just post a picture of grace park

gr8080, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:21 (fifteen years ago)

Sy Fysisco

goole, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:21 (fifteen years ago)

i think that's the joke anyway

goole, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:21 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, that's the joke.

James Woods, Hysterical Realism (Eazy), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:22 (fifteen years ago)

I am really amazed this thread stayed serious for as long as it did

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:22 (fifteen years ago)

especially with you here Dan :)

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:24 (fifteen years ago)

I am back to liking this thread again, fyi

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:25 (fifteen years ago)

I generally DO know when to shut up!

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:27 (fifteen years ago)

btw I only know like 4 of them and they all kind of look like Laurie Anderson

ILX is a virus.

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:27 (fifteen years ago)

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:32 (fifteen years ago)

O Superchallops

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

lol what the hell happened here?

I don't generally identify as bi. I have hooked up with women and had a short relationship with one but have always gravitated towards men and generally think of myself as straight even thought overall I'd actually say I'm more physically attracted to chicks. I've also never hooked up with a girl for or with a guy or whatever because it would just be messy and, yes, I would consider that cheating.

Also, hot dykes totally exist. One of my bff's from HS (the one short girl girl relationship I had) is adorable.

ENBB, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

can vouch for hot dykes...in fact Ive only known a few who werent ridic gorgeous..and Ive known one "yeesh" dyke but she was crazy as a shithouse rat so she doesnt count :)

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:39 (fifteen years ago)

I'm not sure I understand your use of the word Yeesh! VG...

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

/SF is just full of ugly people lol/


--James Woods, Hysterical Realism (Eazy)

THERE ARE 12 LESBIAN MODELS

Anti-mist K-Lo (Phil D.), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

'Yeesh' as in um, difficult on the eyes? Unattractive?

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:55 (fifteen years ago)

xp - guilty nerd lol

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:57 (fifteen years ago)

Mods, rename this the Rolling ILX'ers Talk Shit Thread

thnks

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 21:57 (fifteen years ago)

hurrah, great thread

max, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 22:01 (fifteen years ago)

http://dl3.glitter-graphics.net/pub/1862/1862103tbnlshtl7n.gif

omar little, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 22:02 (fifteen years ago)

1. threesomes do exist, but rarely after college
2. many lesbians are hot, many arent. also true of people in general oddly enough
3. now what

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 22:03 (fifteen years ago)

i already dealt with the down low thing upthread in a sweeping generalist "wow thats fucking stupid" kind of way

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 22:03 (fifteen years ago)

'thread of gaping, well-lubricated generalizations'

The Louvin Spoonful (WmC), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 22:04 (fifteen years ago)

let's now talk about donkey punching

San Te, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 22:05 (fifteen years ago)

gonna have to know more about the donkey before i weigh in with my moral judgement tbh

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

it's on a canoe

San Te, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 22:07 (fifteen years ago)

we are still on the "SHOW US THE LESBIAN ORGY" step of the argument

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 22:07 (fifteen years ago)

no reason we can't shoehorn the lesbians into the donkey punch canoe

San Te, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 22:08 (fifteen years ago)

Jjj your assignment is to sum up this thread on the new clusterfuck thread using only gifs

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 22:21 (fifteen years ago)

hahahaha

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 22:23 (fifteen years ago)

here let me help

http://i.imgur.com/l6PIY.gif

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 22:28 (fifteen years ago)

Key, because my bisexual wife has a major thing for Olivia Wilde (so do I btw).

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 22:30 (fifteen years ago)

It doesn't seem too outrageous to assume that folks with a bisexual-identifying partner have a better chance of a sanctioned threeway than ones with straight ones.

James Woods, Hysterical Realism (Eazy), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 22:40 (fifteen years ago)

It's no syllogism (g? j?), but just sayin', slightly better.

James Woods, Hysterical Realism (Eazy), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 22:41 (fifteen years ago)

But it's also pretty annoying when people assume that ime.

ENBB, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:06 (fifteen years ago)

Most dudes I know who are with bisexual women are v insecure about their mates' sexual adventurousness, rather than try to wrangle in an outside party for fantasy fulfillment

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:11 (fifteen years ago)

well the other thing too is that, generally speaking, when people enter into a relationship with someone it's often because they want to be monogamous, so busting out the "hey how about a threesome?" line tends to go over like a damp fart regardless of the partner's sexuality

believe me, I know </stupidthingsiaskedforinmycollegedays>

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:13 (fifteen years ago)

1. you (a 'straight' male) are introduced to a pair of gorgeous identical twin women
2. one of them identifies as 'straight', the other as 'bisexual'
3. how many apples do you have left

mookieproof, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:19 (fifteen years ago)

I find the thought of making out with two sisters (much less two sisters that are identical) incredibly disturbing

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:20 (fifteen years ago)

wait which sister has the bisexual apple?

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:22 (fifteen years ago)

disturbing.........in ur PANTS

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:24 (fifteen years ago)

Identical-twin yet unrelated women (i.e., Robert Palmer backup singers).

James Woods, Hysterical Realism (Eazy), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:31 (fifteen years ago)

oh, well that's different

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:31 (fifteen years ago)

clones, is what he's saying.

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:33 (fifteen years ago)

If Head Six and Caprica Six were both holding apples, would you remove your pants #battlestargalactica

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:35 (fifteen years ago)

i am friends w/ fairly attractive identical twin sisters who are both gynocologists

gr8080, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:37 (fifteen years ago)

wait I saw that movie

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:38 (fifteen years ago)

they end up murdering each other iirc

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:38 (fifteen years ago)

then regenerate

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:40 (fifteen years ago)

Most dudes I know who are with bisexual women are v insecure about their mates' sexual adventurousness, rather than try to wrangle in an outside party for fantasy fulfillment

― Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, March 30, 2011 7:11 PM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark

Marcel Proust to thread re: Swann's obsession with his lesbo (or not?) mistress

the tune is space, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:40 (fifteen years ago)

jeremy irons is not a lady xpost hahaha yep beaten to the joke

broke my o_O face o_O (jjjusten), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:41 (fifteen years ago)

i don't think marcel proust is going to come to the thread tho

mookieproof, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:41 (fifteen years ago)

Caprica vs. Sharon TS

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:41 (fifteen years ago)

quick someone bake some cookies

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:43 (fifteen years ago)

Starbuck vs Boomer TS

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:44 (fifteen years ago)

Starbuck wasn't a cylon!!!

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:44 (fifteen years ago)

like there were episodes with two model 6's and two Sharons

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:45 (fifteen years ago)

Boomer. Caprica's too bony and Starbuck's like an angel or something, they're probably terrible at sex

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:45 (fifteen years ago)

xxpost or WAS SHE

(okay fine she wasn't but I forgot we were talking about clones)

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:45 (fifteen years ago)

Lucy Lawless vs Caprica

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:45 (fifteen years ago)

fixed

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:46 (fifteen years ago)

ha - was just gonna post about her, though i'm trying to remember whether there more than one of her with actual lines?

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:46 (fifteen years ago)

...It just makes your hands cramp xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxpost

San Te, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:46 (fifteen years ago)

stfu we're talking about cylons now San Te, jeeeeez :)

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:47 (fifteen years ago)

xpost sarah yeah there was the news reportery Lucy Lawless, and I think the spaceship Lucy...but I sucked at keeping all those copies straight

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:48 (fifteen years ago)

Xp Plus Proust and bisexual apples

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:49 (fifteen years ago)

i dunno, i just resent watching the last season just to find out who the final cylon was after it got really insulting with the dumb Starbuck-as-angel plot and the "All Along the Watchtower" thing

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:50 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah the Starbuck thing left me pretty PO'd. Moore had given her the best storylines for almost the entire season, made her this kickass character and then that? wtf.

Anyway we probably should talk about hot lesbians or cheating before we get yelled at

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:51 (fifteen years ago)

1: I'm another one of ILX's female bisexuals.

2: I like group sex quite a bit, but the thing about threesomes that hasn't been brought up yet is that if you are one sex and the other two are of another sex, and neither of the two are bisexual or curious that way, you have to satisfy both of them. It's not the two-people-working-on-another thing that it's often pictured as.

Christine Green Leafy Dragon Indigo, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:51 (fifteen years ago)

lol I don't even remember who the final cylon was now

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:51 (fifteen years ago)

xpost "series" not "season"

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:52 (fifteen years ago)

can we talk about Apollo in a fat suit, and how that was the beginning of the end of my good relationship w/BSG?

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:52 (fifteen years ago)

crap. I don't remember who the final cylon was either!

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:52 (fifteen years ago)

seriously turning starbuck into an angel was like putting han solo on endor.

omar little, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:53 (fifteen years ago)

it was balthar.

sarahel, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:53 (fifteen years ago)

the final cylon was the viewer at home

omar little, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:53 (fifteen years ago)

the final ceylons were the readers of this thread

mookieproof, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:53 (fifteen years ago)

god that ending was so bad

VegemiteGrrl, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:54 (fifteen years ago)

starbuck's last scene =

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecW0B5rELyo

omar little, Wednesday, 30 March 2011 23:55 (fifteen years ago)

you have to satisfy both of them. It's not the two-people-working-on-another thing that it's often pictured as.

the words "have to" and "not" are doing some heavy generalist lifting here

Neo Tony (sic), Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:00 (fifteen years ago)

You guys are lucky I watched the final episode of BSG two days ago otherwise I'd be SBing like crazy

Not the real Village People, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:02 (fifteen years ago)

now do you just feel like SBing the writers of BSG?

sarahel, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:03 (fifteen years ago)

YES I DO
Was p shitty. Fat Apollo gave us plenty of lols tho

Not the real Village People, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:03 (fifteen years ago)

fat apollo and the reappearance of olmos miami vice stache

omar little, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:05 (fifteen years ago)

bsg?

ENBB, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:07 (fifteen years ago)

Battlestar Galactica!

sarahel, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:07 (fifteen years ago)

ha oh

I skipped over those posts cause I've never seen it even tho I know I should

ENBB, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:08 (fifteen years ago)

I never watched the last season of BSG even though I love it because I had a feeling it would dump me like a ton of bricks.

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:15 (fifteen years ago)

So THANKS FOR RUINING EVEN THAT MUCH.

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:15 (fifteen years ago)

Boomer: the hot gal in S(cience)F(iction)

James Woods, Hysterical Realism (Eazy), Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:15 (fifteen years ago)

Bababooey

San Te, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:16 (fifteen years ago)

Laurel, it's kinda like if you were dating a guy who was cool, rakish and clever, and he joined a religious cult and got super flaky and annoying.

sarahel, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:16 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.tomcruise.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/tom-cruise-risky-business.jpg

omar little, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:18 (fifteen years ago)

alright already with the BSG, y'all

"you have to satisfy both of them. It's not the two-people-working-on-another thing that it's often pictured as."

all kinds of scenarios can develop though, it just depends- but I think it's a missed opportunity if everybody isn't working on everybody- (whether it's MMF, MFF, MMM, FFF, whatever)- didn't "Y Tu Mama Tambien" sell people on this idea?

the tune is space, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:18 (fifteen years ago)

baltar had a threeway w/lawless and caprica 6 iirc

omar little, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:19 (fifteen years ago)

I don't know what you BSG people are even talking about, the real stand-out from that show is Helo.

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:22 (fifteen years ago)

Call me when they make 10^6 cylons of HIM.

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:23 (fifteen years ago)

bsg talk itt is tripping me out cause I've never seen it but I know Boomer irl

gr8080, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:23 (fifteen years ago)

!!!!!

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:24 (fifteen years ago)

oh gr80

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:25 (fifteen years ago)

(no suze)

gr8080, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:40 (fifteen years ago)

wow this thread. that "real-life lesbians" derail, i can't even.

horseshoe, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:45 (fifteen years ago)

...imagine beautiful lesbians??? i know, it's impossible!!!

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:45 (fifteen years ago)

beyond the wrongness, do i actually have to read straight men being all, "lol dykes are ugly amirite?" on ilx? it is definitely all about your penis, even when we're talking about gay women.

horseshoe, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:48 (fifteen years ago)

:-/

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:49 (fifteen years ago)

it was like getting stuck inside chasing amy for a while there

ENBB, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:50 (fifteen years ago)

x-post

although I'm not sure that was exactly what was meant by those posts (are we talking shakey mo?)

ENBB, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:50 (fifteen years ago)

actual anticipatory rubbing of hands over here when i scrolled down and saw that shakey post and realized there were dozens of new answers below it.

omar little, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:51 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha I just read Frog's posts

is that guy for real?

wow

ENBB, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:52 (fifteen years ago)

yeah there's one level where it's like Jesus Shakey WTF @ u for even thinking that but there's a whole other level where it's like JESUS YOU POSTED THAT ON A MESSAGEBOARD

gr8080, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:53 (fifteen years ago)

like I always assumed shakey mo was a self-aware moron but it turns out he's just a moron, so weird

gr8080, Thursday, 31 March 2011 00:54 (fifteen years ago)

Oh sweet gr80's just set the next 300 posts in motion now

San Te, Thursday, 31 March 2011 01:01 (fifteen years ago)

by all means, San Te, feel free to steer it back towards shitting/donkey punch jokes

gr8080, Thursday, 31 March 2011 01:03 (fifteen years ago)

guys i really have the best shitting donkey punch joke

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Thursday, 31 March 2011 01:04 (fifteen years ago)

it is definitely all about your penis, even when we're talking about gay women.

posts u just want to copy and paste like 10,000x.

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Thursday, 31 March 2011 01:05 (fifteen years ago)

sorta forgot how it goes but a guy goes to a petting zoo party (they got a new goat) and is like great party man and the other guy is like yeah its fun you should check out the drinks table and the first guy gets a drink and comes back and is like i didn't know you had one of those parrots that shat coffee beans this coffee is great and the second guy is like wait a minute the donkey shat in the punch

the word "ass" figures in, too, but i'm still trying to piece it all together

FUN FUN FUN FUN (gbx), Thursday, 31 March 2011 01:07 (fifteen years ago)

alternately,

beyond the wrongness, do i actually have to read straight men being all, "lol dykes are ugly amirite?" on ilx? it is definitely all about your penis, even when we're talking about gay women you're talking about your wife cheating on you with a woman.

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Thursday, 31 March 2011 01:09 (fifteen years ago)

sometimes I think "Shakey Mo Collier" is a porn myth.

I slang in my (absolutely clean glasses), Thursday, 31 March 2011 01:19 (fifteen years ago)

think shakey really meant to post this

Please note that utility data for the entire campus is also included. This was the only data made available with the application, and in order to accurately estimate and verify savings, individual building meter data will need to be obtained from the campus.

buzza, Thursday, 31 March 2011 01:27 (fifteen years ago)

Gr80 I would but I'd rather see you flip out some more

San Te, Thursday, 31 March 2011 02:38 (fifteen years ago)

http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x18/gr8080/JAMIE-FOXX-GIF.gif

gr8080, Thursday, 31 March 2011 02:49 (fifteen years ago)

beyond the wrongness, do i actually have to read straight men being all, "lol dykes are ugly amirite?" on ilx? it is definitely all about your penis, even when we're talking about gay women.

afaik most browsers have a little red x in the top right corner that you can click when the shit gets too real

frogbs, Thursday, 31 March 2011 03:40 (fifteen years ago)

horseshoe might prefer to click the two little blue words.

estela, Thursday, 31 March 2011 03:47 (fifteen years ago)

frogsb

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 31 March 2011 03:57 (fifteen years ago)

oh my god frogbs

gr8080, Thursday, 31 March 2011 03:58 (fifteen years ago)

i've been silently calling him that for some time now.

estela, Thursday, 31 March 2011 03:59 (fifteen years ago)

xp

estela, Thursday, 31 March 2011 03:59 (fifteen years ago)

amazing new poster

timbo slice (D-40), Thursday, 31 March 2011 04:07 (fifteen years ago)

He did start the Japanese New Wave thread

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 31 March 2011 04:08 (fifteen years ago)

shit gets real indeed

timbo slice (D-40), Thursday, 31 March 2011 04:11 (fifteen years ago)

real discursively retrograde.

estela, Thursday, 31 March 2011 04:14 (fifteen years ago)

(Just sayin; ppl seemed to like that. That's why I haven't sb'd him)

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 31 March 2011 04:19 (fifteen years ago)

MARK RUFFALO

estela, Thursday, 31 March 2011 04:20 (fifteen years ago)

(Sb'd myself tho)

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 31 March 2011 04:20 (fifteen years ago)

I won't lump the gals together if the gals don't lump the fellas together.

discursive gatorade (Eazy), Thursday, 31 March 2011 04:31 (fifteen years ago)

What does Mark Ruffalo have to do with it?

Oh Shit People Like Your Ballads Oh Nooooo (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 31 March 2011 04:34 (fifteen years ago)

that's the horseshoe summons.

estela, Thursday, 31 March 2011 04:39 (fifteen years ago)

What's Mark Ruffalo but a second-hand emotion?

discursive gatorade (Eazy), Thursday, 31 March 2011 04:42 (fifteen years ago)

Lol

drugnet (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 31 March 2011 04:57 (fifteen years ago)

It's like Candyman...you say Mark Ruffalo three tines and horseshoe appears

(like me and Aaron Rodgers) :D

VegemiteGrrl, Thursday, 31 March 2011 05:33 (fifteen years ago)

Times
Raagh

VegemiteGrrl, Thursday, 31 March 2011 05:34 (fifteen years ago)

http://foodservice.oneida.com/resources/oneidaFoodservice/images/products/processed/B817FDNF.zoom.1.jpg

Neo Tony (sic), Thursday, 31 March 2011 05:57 (fifteen years ago)

i have up GISing tines after seeing the erection pic

men at work choices (electricsound), Thursday, 31 March 2011 05:57 (fifteen years ago)

gave up

men at work choices (electricsound), Thursday, 31 March 2011 05:57 (fifteen years ago)

I have "up" after seeing the erection pic

Neo Tony (sic), Thursday, 31 March 2011 06:15 (fifteen years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/ktRG5.jpg

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Thursday, 31 March 2011 06:32 (fifteen years ago)

glad frogbs is 100% real

buzza, Thursday, 31 March 2011 07:17 (fifteen years ago)

sock it to em

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Thursday, 31 March 2011 07:29 (fifteen years ago)

ive been in the situation to have a threesome with two girls once, and i freaked and left.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah! TWO! (thebingo), Thursday, 31 March 2011 13:20 (fifteen years ago)

by "freaked" do you mean "came" ?

frogbs, Thursday, 31 March 2011 13:21 (fifteen years ago)

haha, nope. i watched them get busy for a few minutes, they asked me to join in and i chickened out and ran.

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah! TWO! (thebingo), Thursday, 31 March 2011 13:25 (fifteen years ago)

0 pumps

timbo slice (D-40), Thursday, 31 March 2011 14:01 (fifteen years ago)

2 stumped 2 pump

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Thursday, 31 March 2011 14:03 (fifteen years ago)

2 stumps 1 pump

La descente infernale (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 31 March 2011 14:03 (fifteen years ago)

waow

drugnet (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 31 March 2011 14:05 (fifteen years ago)

ZERO PUMPS. Massive boner

Get me two meatball sandwiches Utah! TWO! (thebingo), Thursday, 31 March 2011 14:27 (fifteen years ago)

thank you for ruining "Pumps and a Bump"

whelping at his sandpapery best (DJP), Thursday, 31 March 2011 14:38 (fifteen years ago)

how i roll

Zero pumps, massive boner (thebingo), Thursday, 31 March 2011 14:44 (fifteen years ago)

so yeah. this thread.

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

. . .

gr8080, Thursday, 31 March 2011 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

it's a group effort

VegemiteGrrl, Thursday, 31 March 2011 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

and yet three's a crowd

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Thursday, 31 March 2011 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

it just requires the lesson we all learned from Sesame Street: CO-OP-ERATION!

VegemiteGrrl, Thursday, 31 March 2011 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

so yeah. this thread.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (5 hours ago) Permalink

so yeah. this thread.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (5 hours ago) Permalink

so yeah. this thread.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (5 hours ago) Permalink

so yeah. this thread.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (5 hours ago) Permalink

so yeah. this thread.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (5 hours ago) Permalink

so yeah. this thread.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (5 hours ago) Permalink

so yeah. this thread.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (5 hours ago) Permalink

so yeah. this thread.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (5 hours ago) Permalink

so yeah. this thread.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (5 hours ago) Permalink

so yeah. this thread.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (5 hours ago) Permalink

so yeah. this thread.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (5 hours ago) Permalink

so yeah. this thread.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (5 hours ago) Permalink

so yeah. this thread.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (5 hours ago) Permalink

so yeah. this thread.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (5 hours ago) Permalink

so yeah. this thread.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (5 hours ago) Permalink

so yeah. this thread.

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 31 March 2011 15:57 (5 hours ago) Permalink

gr8080, Thursday, 31 March 2011 21:01 (fifteen years ago)

MARK RUFFALO

― estela, Thursday, March 31, 2011 12:20 AM (19 hours ago) Bookmark

<3

horseshoe, Thursday, 31 March 2011 23:57 (fifteen years ago)

afaik most browsers have a little red x in the top right corner that you can click when the shit gets too real

― frogbs, Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:40 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

thank you for bringing your all important boner to my attention it is indeed too real for me

horseshoe, Thursday, 31 March 2011 23:59 (fifteen years ago)

omg shit's too real

http://www.bergproperties.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/ruffalo_watts_wideweb__430x286.jpg

sarahel, Friday, 1 April 2011 00:35 (fifteen years ago)

http://i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp324/frugsplayground/1256523423443.jpg

VegemiteGrrl, Friday, 1 April 2011 01:41 (fifteen years ago)

Ayo Shakey this is for you:

Chely Wright, the country singer who came out as a lesbian last May after her publicist set a guessing game in motion, is engaged to be married to gay-rights activist Lauren Blitzer.

"The freedom of being out and open about who I am allowed me to find and fall in love with Lauren, the most amazing woman I've ever known," Wright told People on Wednesday. The two plan to marry in Connecticut on Aug. 20, according to the mag.

http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/Lauren-Blitzer-and-Chely-Wright-IMG_0252.jpg

If that is not sufficiently "attractive" I don't think we can help you any further.

Anti-mist K-Lo (Phil D.), Friday, 8 April 2011 14:52 (fifteen years ago)

OMG, would rally for her equal rights.

the best reggae summer club there used to be in Helsinki (kkvgz), Friday, 8 April 2011 14:57 (fifteen years ago)

If that is not sufficiently "attractive" I don't think we can help you any further.

I do not know these people personally. they are celebrities.

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

I have never met a real life lesbian who was actually attractive by hetero standards.

^^^here is an exercise in reading comprehension 101

there are loads of pretty famous people. this is not news.

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:31 (fifteen years ago)

shakey how can you read that sentence and not be deeply embarrassed that you ever wrote it?? i mean you seem like a smart enough guy

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

why should I be deeply embarassed about an observation about my personal life that is entirely accurate?

should I claim that I have met lesbians I have been attracted to when that isn't remotely true?

wtf

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

^^^here is an exercise in reading comprehension 101

and ^^^here is an exercise in trying to weasel your way out of being wrong

the best reggae summer club there used to be in Helsinki (kkvgz), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:35 (fifteen years ago)

I have never met a real life lesbian who was actually attractive by hetero standards.

^^^here is an exercise in reading comprehension 101

there are loads of pretty famous people. this is not news.

But they apparently don't exist in real life or . . . ?

Anti-mist K-Lo (Phil D.), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

if it was an observational about your personal life then it would have read, actually attractive by my hetero standards; instead you've appointed yourself ambassador of the heteros and arbiter of attractiveness

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

i mean i would think you would be embarrassed enough to bring dumbshit anecdotal/personal observations into a conversation already fraught with assumption/generalization about a subject invested w/ a great deal of emotion? but then youre like "by hetero standards"? and youre not even interested in unpacking any of the stuff that goes into what you said?? i mean i guess ilx is "over it" or whatever

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

smdh

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

like, i will consult my hetero standards guidebook (page one: is of opposite sex), but i don't think that kind of thing is unanimous

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:38 (fifteen years ago)

d, actually attractive by my hetero standards; instead you've appointed yourself ambassador of the heteros and arbiter of attractiveness

I assumed the "MY" was implied by the subset of lesbians "I HAVE MET" and the well-known fact that I am hetero, but thx for being stupid everybody. I'm glad we all agree that lesbians that are attractive to hetero men exist, hooray.

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:40 (fifteen years ago)

like I dunno how I would determine that lesbians I have met are attractive to other hetero men, that seems like a bizarre way to read that sentence

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

btw if I had meant to say "all lesbians are ugly" I WOULD HAVE SAID IT

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:42 (fifteen years ago)

"all lesbians are ugly"

― in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, April 8, 2011 11:42 AM Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

brb, posting this all over ILX

fat fat fat fat Usher (DJP), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:43 (fifteen years ago)

oh ok--you were just saying youve never met a lesbian to whom you were attracted. thats much better, yes, and definitely an observation worth making.

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:43 (fifteen years ago)

lets not get into lesbiotics here.

Zero pumps, massive boner (thebingo), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

lol thx Dan

glad we've switched over to determining what is "worth" observing on ILX now lol. yeah nothing but high-quality, well-reasoned insights from now on amirite

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:46 (fifteen years ago)

good point--theres so much dumb worthless shit on ilx, why bother pointing any of it out

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTJ52Cz1SEwR5y7eObQOQKlEVM_DAFW9s5QQbUXWNLyT4OGoAvaNg

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:49 (fifteen years ago)

i might just start a thread--"types of people that have never given me a boner"

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

All of us in this thread?

Hey Look More Than Five Years Has Passed And You Have A C (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

ilx posters are, yes, at the top of the list

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:53 (fifteen years ago)

I have never met a real life lesbian who was actually attractive by hetero standards.

maybe you just assume that the attractive women you've ever met are all exclusively hetero? (all lesbians are easily identifiable by their short hair, ugly faces, & practical shoes.)

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

itt: shakey dispels the pernicious myth of the lipstick lesbian

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 8 April 2011 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

it really is tearing our society apart

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

eh, who needs a society full of uggoes

fat fat fat fat Usher (DJP), Friday, 8 April 2011 16:01 (fifteen years ago)

i might just start a thread--"types of people that have never given me a boner"

― ban drake (the rapper) (max), Friday, April 8, 2011 3:50 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark

please

Zero pumps, massive boner (thebingo), Friday, 8 April 2011 16:09 (fifteen years ago)

I like to call that thread "ILM."

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Friday, 8 April 2011 16:10 (fifteen years ago)

HAHA!

Zero pumps, massive boner (thebingo), Friday, 8 April 2011 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

Fuck, I wish I'd been following this thread earlier. IDK if this has been covered but there's been a bit of discussion on the gay thread about the fetishization of the "straight married man" and the ethics of fucking married dudes. I mean, obv it's much more complex than simply cheating w/ another woman due to all of the intricacies of "the closet", but it's a matter of whether that excuses it; it's easy to say "oh, it's a fake marriage bcz the husb is only partially invested" and completely disregard the wife, who is prob oblivious and fully committed

Of course, all of this is bunk if you don't consider the "partner in crime" to be a guilty party.

ToeJam & Lewis (Stevie D(eux)), Friday, 8 April 2011 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

but thx for being stupid everybody

likewise, shakey

Oink Administrator (gr8080), Friday, 8 April 2011 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2011/04/07/female-infidelity-its-different-from-the-guys

mookieproof, Friday, 8 April 2011 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

While there aren't any hard statistics on female infidelity, most experts agree that it's on the rise

lol

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 18:28 (fifteen years ago)

indeed

mookieproof, Friday, 8 April 2011 18:29 (fifteen years ago)

Almost every sentence of that article so bullshitty.

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Friday, 8 April 2011 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

Ian Kerner, a sexuality counselor and New York Times best-selling author, blogs about sex on Thursdays on The Chart. Read more from him at his website, GoodInBed.

fat fat fat fat Usher (DJP), Friday, 8 April 2011 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

"It's so harmless when men cheat on their wives! They don't mean anything by it! But women, now that's a horse of a different color if u know what I mean, AND I THINK U DO."

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Friday, 8 April 2011 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

otm

ENBB, Friday, 8 April 2011 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

maybe you just assume that the attractive women you've ever met are all exclusively hetero? (all lesbians are easily identifiable by their short hair, ugly faces, & practical shoes.)

― tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, April 8, 2011 8:56 AM (2 hours ago)

otm

sarahel, Friday, 8 April 2011 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

poll!

- She shows less general interest in her partner's comings and goings

- She dresses up for work, but seems to care less about whether her partner finds her attractive

- She has less interest in sex with her partner

- She's keeping an irregular schedule and spending more time at work

- She seems happy, except when she's around her partner

- She shows less tolerance of her partner's friends and family

- There are unresolved issues in the relationship that have either been ignored or not resolved in a way that's satisfying to her

- She's in a child-centric marriage that prioritizes parenting and neglects a couple's relationship, with few opportunities for romance and alone time

goole, Friday, 8 April 2011 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

maybe you just assume that the attractive women you've ever met are all exclusively hetero? (all lesbians are easily identifiable by their short hair, ugly faces, & practical shoes.)

― tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, April 8, 2011 8:56 AM (2 hours ago)

otm

bi /= lesbian btw

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 18:41 (fifteen years ago)

Signs that she might be cheating or thinking about it (so we're policing her thoughts now too, apparently):

* You're a jerk.
* You're a jerk.
* She's tired of your being a jerk.
* She doesn't want to have sex with you because you're a jerk.
* There are unresolved issues in the relationship that have either been ignored or not resolved in a way that's satisfying to her, because you have been a jerk so get some therapy and/or WORK IT OUT and also STOP BEING A JERK.

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Friday, 8 April 2011 18:41 (fifteen years ago)

half of those are less "signs a woman may be cheating" and more "signs that a woman may be in a relationship with a douche"

xp: lol Laurel

fat fat fat fat Usher (DJP), Friday, 8 April 2011 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

do you poll every woman you meet about her sexual orientation?

sarahel, Friday, 8 April 2011 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

and I'm not talking about the women I find attractive that I've met - I'm talking about the women I have met who are, for lack of a better term, "committed" lesbians (ie, out and proud about it). these are different subsets of women.

xp

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

http://cc.pbsstatic.com/l/34/3934/9781570643934.jpg

omar little, Friday, 8 April 2011 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

^^^^^

ENBB, Friday, 8 April 2011 18:43 (fifteen years ago)

i've met some pretty fine lesbians in my day. i dunno, just my experience. might help this thread.

goole, Friday, 8 April 2011 18:44 (fifteen years ago)

Shakey, you realize we're continuing to give you shit because that was a seriously wtf "Rong" thing to say, the way you originally phrased it, right?

sarahel, Friday, 8 April 2011 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

xxxp Could also be re-titled "Signs that you are not the center of her physical and mental world, in which case you might want to look out because bitch gets any ideas in her little head, you're screwed."

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Friday, 8 April 2011 18:47 (fifteen years ago)

eh I guess? ILX loves a semantics argument

at the same time, the level of interest some of you guys have in a casual observation I made about my personal life and the people in it is sort of strange. like it is SO IMPORTANT that I be attracted to a lesbian I have met. um waht? the mind boggles at the amount of irony involved.

anyway let's move on...
xp

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 18:47 (fifteen years ago)

but, the thing is, you said ....

fuck it, ILX loves a semantics argument.

sarahel, Friday, 8 April 2011 18:50 (fifteen years ago)

shakey please, this may surprise you but not every woman you find attractive is interested in your dick or any other

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 8 April 2011 18:50 (fifteen years ago)

he lives in SF -- unless he's a total moron or a complete shut-in -- I think he is at least aware of that, elmo

sarahel, Friday, 8 April 2011 18:51 (fifteen years ago)

I'm well aware of this and never intimated otherwise

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 18:51 (fifteen years ago)

Like, a lot of my wtf at Shakey's initial comment was because
a) you live in San Francisco, dude where:
i) there are a lot of lesbians
ii) there are a lot of really attractive people

sarahel, Friday, 8 April 2011 18:53 (fifteen years ago)

that's fine, just another casual insinuation about a correlation between unattractiveness and lesbianism, let's all be cool

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 8 April 2011 18:54 (fifteen years ago)

exactly! I don't disagree with that! Which is why my initial comment was that it was STRANGE that all the lesbians I have been personally acquainted/friends/coworkers with are all so unattractive!

what can I say, my world is filled with ugly people lol

xp

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 18:55 (fifteen years ago)

Shakey, you need to get out more.

sarahel, Friday, 8 April 2011 18:56 (fifteen years ago)

probably true

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

now would be a good time!

sarahel, Friday, 8 April 2011 18:58 (fifteen years ago)

him: What manners… Go eat some stinky Pussy..

I mean really

fat fat fat fat Usher (DJP), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

I'm not sure what the big deal is about this. I wouldn't think most open lesbians would really try to be attractive to men so I mean its not like we're being horrible people for noting the "disconnect" between male-fantasy lesbians you see in porno and the ones you actually meet in public. I mean its not like there are a lot of them in pop culture or anything, not like there is for gays, so what do we know

frogbs, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

you and shakey mo should have a radio show together

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

wow

sarahel, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

you and shakey mo should have a radio show together

no. no we should not

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:28 (fifteen years ago)

but there are lesbians who oh god nevermind i am not getting into this with u

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:28 (fifteen years ago)

http://outsideonline.com/images/outside/200806/radio-djs-1.jpg

omar little, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:29 (fifteen years ago)

Uhhh no I totally know what you're saying I'm not that fucking stupid, I'm just surprised this become such a thing, I mean you guys are totally right, everything is semantics at this point

frogbs, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

just a bit of semantics lets be cool

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

the daily lesbian with frogsb and shakey

Zero pumps, massive boner (thebingo), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

hahah

VegemiteGrrl, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:32 (fifteen years ago)

It's no big deal just that non-lipstick-lesbians are objectively ugly, everyone's cool with that, right?

Anti-mist K-Lo (Phil D.), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

oh this thread, never change

VegemiteGrrl, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

butch lesbians?

Zero pumps, massive boner (thebingo), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

what about lesbians who look like failing rockstars

VegemiteGrrl, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:34 (fifteen years ago)

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_f_qAlqzwqyo/S9f2knHGupI/AAAAAAAAACM/lRgYe2HDs68/s1600/parents_cannot_accept_lesbain.jpg

Zero pumps, massive boner (thebingo), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:35 (fifteen years ago)

lesbians, unshaven, clogs, polarfleece, subaru, dogs

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

I really feel like our endless fascination with taking each other apart is making us really not appreciate the magic gift of wrongness goole gave us

fat fat fat fat Usher (DJP), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

Jesus people stop putting words in my mouth, I mean you can say that about anything, you if you see a few Aussie dudes on TV in a soap opera and they're super attractive then you meet some randoms in a bar somewhere, you can say something about that without people calling you a bigot.

frogbs, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:39 (fifteen years ago)

what?

goole, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:39 (fifteen years ago)

Hahahahaaaa

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:40 (fifteen years ago)

Wait, what??

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:40 (fifteen years ago)

I mean I even mentioned a real life lesbian upthread that I found really attractive so obviously the seal is broken

frogbs, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

how do you tell if the people in porn are australian?

goole, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:42 (fifteen years ago)

can we get a translator up in this thing?

VegemiteGrrl, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:42 (fifteen years ago)

am v interested in Australian soap opera actors btw

VegemiteGrrl, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

how do you tell if the people in porn are australian?

they're drinking Fosters and the dirty talk is all variations on "oh yeah, put your shrimp on my barby"

fat fat fat fat Usher (DJP), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

they all just trying to dildoize the community.

Zero pumps, massive boner (thebingo), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:44 (fifteen years ago)

Cockodile Dundee

Zero pumps, massive boner (thebingo), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:44 (fifteen years ago)

Yahboobs Serious

VegemiteGrrl, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

Can tell Australian porn by whether doodz leave their boots on or not

VegemiteGrrl, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

oh, are we at that point in the rhythm of the thread were there's a series of about 30-40 posts of puns? It will inevitably be followed by another "wtf" post, and the cycle will repeat.

sarahel, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

Yahboobs Serious

noooooooooooooooo that is an unfortunate mental image

fat fat fat fat Usher (DJP), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

http://blogs.hillandknowlton.com/hank/files/2010/03/yahoo.jpg

like, add boobs to this and basically it is the end of the world

fat fat fat fat Usher (DJP), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

it depends where you add the boobs, dan

sarahel, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

Wow its like you've read this board before

frogbs, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:49 (fifteen years ago)

are you getting paid to troll?

sarahel, Friday, 8 April 2011 19:49 (fifteen years ago)

i like how 'australian' has the analogue for 'lesbian' here

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

australians are criminals so

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

frogbs is Treezy Forbeezy and i claim my $5

motivatedgirl (Matt P), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

i am reminded of a woman i once saw at a lez bar who was dressed exactly like croc dundee

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 8 April 2011 19:59 (fifteen years ago)

Crocodile Lesbee

Zero pumps, massive boner (thebingo), Friday, 8 April 2011 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

xp - did she stuff and tape?

sarahel, Friday, 8 April 2011 20:01 (fifteen years ago)

Tie me kangaroo down, jort

frogbs, Friday, 8 April 2011 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

okay lol

fat fat fat fat Usher (DJP), Friday, 8 April 2011 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

haha really everything except that - the boots, the bush hat adorned with horns & shark teeth, the leather vest, the bleached out hair - everything

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 8 April 2011 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

i bet she had a bush hat.

Zero pumps, massive boner (thebingo), Friday, 8 April 2011 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

was her name Keitha?

VegemiteGrrl, Friday, 8 April 2011 20:48 (fifteen years ago)

did all the boyth want to touch her junk?

sarahel, Friday, 8 April 2011 20:49 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoF_fa9TMDk

VegemiteGrrl, Friday, 8 April 2011 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

can we ask frogbs staight out whose sock he is yet, i'm never sure of the politics of this stuff

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Friday, 8 April 2011 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

I feel like everyone always knows who all the socks are but me.

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Friday, 8 April 2011 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

laurel.xls is missing or corrupt

mookieproof, Friday, 8 April 2011 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

i was hired straight out of college as a sock purchaser, lasted a week. So there's two of us clueless on he subject at least

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Friday, 8 April 2011 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

what is a sock

do I want to know

maybe I'm just happy knowing abt shoes and socks and no further connotations than that

curiosity is a curse, lemme tell ya

VegemiteGrrl, Friday, 8 April 2011 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I've never understood the sock thing. seems like it would take so much effort to maintain a fake account/persona, it seems like the kind of thing you would only do if you were seriously psychotic and had too much time on your hands

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 21:53 (fifteen years ago)

Shakey, sometimes it's like you wandered into a messageboard by accident just looking for directions.

Back up the lesbian canoe (Laurel), Friday, 8 April 2011 21:56 (fifteen years ago)

I'm new here

in my world of loose geirs (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 8 April 2011 21:57 (fifteen years ago)

seems like the kind of thing you would only do if you were seriously psychotic and had too much time on your hands

^new board description?

omar little, Friday, 8 April 2011 22:00 (fifteen years ago)

wait so a sock is a fakeusername?

whew, I thought it was going to be some kind of sex thing (gee now why would I think that, ILX?)

VegemiteGrrl, Friday, 8 April 2011 22:02 (fifteen years ago)

....... American pie?

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Friday, 8 April 2011 22:04 (fifteen years ago)

but that was a pie, not a sock

VegemiteGrrl, Friday, 8 April 2011 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

first scene was a sock iirc

the salmon of procrastination (darraghmac), Friday, 8 April 2011 22:19 (fifteen years ago)

Sock is from sockpuppet, VG.

Si tu parles, tu meurs. Si tu te tais, tu meurs. Alors, dis et (Michael White), Friday, 8 April 2011 22:19 (fifteen years ago)

I have a headache... I will stop derailing the derailment now

VegemiteGrrl, Friday, 8 April 2011 22:30 (fifteen years ago)

American Sock.

SB Nation (Eazy), Friday, 8 April 2011 22:37 (fifteen years ago)

shakey mo otm re: socks

Oink Administrator (gr8080), Saturday, 9 April 2011 01:54 (fifteen years ago)

frogbs is Treezy Forbeezy and i claim my $5

― motivatedgirl (Matt P), Saturday, 9 April 2011 05:52

LOL hey!!!!

Concubine Tree (Trayce), Saturday, 9 April 2011 03:03 (fifteen years ago)

omg hahaha

ToeJam & Lewis (Stevie D(eux)), Saturday, 9 April 2011 04:04 (fifteen years ago)

I rly hope that name sticks.

ToeJam & Lewis (Stevie D(eux)), Saturday, 9 April 2011 04:04 (fifteen years ago)

It seems to be a little heh.

Concubine Tree (Trayce), Saturday, 9 April 2011 04:37 (fifteen years ago)

I'm voting for this thread in the 2012 Presidential Election

one man's skeevy gas station = another man's supermarket (Drugs A. Money), Saturday, 9 April 2011 23:49 (fifteen years ago)

amazing thread

D-40, Sunday, 10 April 2011 21:08 (fifteen years ago)

Unsurpassable. Thank God.

Stars of the Lidl (seandalai), Monday, 11 April 2011 01:45 (fifteen years ago)

overrated imo

Oink Administrator (gr8080), Monday, 11 April 2011 02:10 (fifteen years ago)

^^overrated post

D-40, Wednesday, 13 April 2011 07:05 (fifteen years ago)

Who are the self-clowning ovens of ILX?

quickie book deal (gr8080), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 08:14 (fifteen years ago)

link to lazy zing catalog thread
- posted by gr8080 who really likes posting that link

sarahel, Wednesday, 13 April 2011 08:24 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.ilxor.com/ILX/ThreadSelectedControllerServlet?showall=true&bookmarkedmessageid=1017480&boardid=79&threadid=76038

quickie book deal (gr8080), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 09:16 (fifteen years ago)

gr80 r u a Libra, or is 10/8 Gr80 day just bcz of 10 x 8

amphetamine fueled scholar (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 16:51 (fifteen years ago)

just a day on the rocktober calendar- 31 days and mine happened to be the 8th

quickie book deal (gr8080), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 18:16 (fifteen years ago)

rock on

amphetamine fueled scholar (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

10/8 is my bday

ban drake (the rapper) (max), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 18:38 (fifteen years ago)

happy birthday max!

quickie book deal (gr8080), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

five months pass...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rex-oso/extramarital-affair_b_976380.html

buzza, Friday, 7 October 2011 01:19 (fourteen years ago)

Rex Oso leads two lives, one married to a woman, the other in love with a man.

buzza, Friday, 7 October 2011 01:20 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/contributors/rex-oso/headshot.jpg

buzza, Friday, 7 October 2011 01:21 (fourteen years ago)

Rex Oso leads two lives, one married to a woman, the other in love with a man.

Rex Oso needs to tell his wife instead of HuffPo

parasitical brain-weevil (onimo), Friday, 7 October 2011 11:36 (fourteen years ago)

ugh that huffpo article

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 October 2011 13:50 (fourteen years ago)

Sex is normal. Sex is natural. Sex is good.

Love is even better.

And lying to your spouse for 7 years is AWESOME!

elmo argonaut, Friday, 7 October 2011 14:22 (fourteen years ago)

rex oso

buzza, Friday, 7 October 2011 14:28 (fourteen years ago)

sex or 0

at-zing-two-boards (darraghmac), Friday, 7 October 2011 14:33 (fourteen years ago)

Sex is normal. Sex is natural. Sex is good.

http://cdn.teenhollywood.com/video-previews/i-want-your-sex-george-michael-308x174.jpg

You people are supposed to be some kind of music culture intelligentsi (Phil D.), Friday, 7 October 2011 14:35 (fourteen years ago)

First thing I thought of too.

Juggy Brottleteen (ENBB), Friday, 7 October 2011 14:36 (fourteen years ago)

I'm not surprised someone with the name Rex Oso fucks dudes

frogbs, Friday, 7 October 2011 14:41 (fourteen years ago)

and there it is

the tax avocado (DJP), Friday, 7 October 2011 14:41 (fourteen years ago)

and there it is

― the tax avocado (DJP), Friday, October 7, 2011 2:41 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Friday, 7 October 2011 14:43 (fourteen years ago)

froggin bomgbs

at-zing-two-boards (darraghmac), Friday, 7 October 2011 14:45 (fourteen years ago)

I'm not surprised someone with the name Rex Oso fucks dudes

^my ILX-ing is sporadic at best, so apologies if this has been covered... but is this dude for fucking real?

7 Crazy Chinese Mothers (will), Friday, 7 October 2011 19:16 (fourteen years ago)

lol

Juggy Brottleteen (ENBB), Friday, 7 October 2011 19:18 (fourteen years ago)

sure this is it

at-zing-two-boards (darraghmac), Friday, 7 October 2011 19:40 (fourteen years ago)

rex oso = "king bear" in some Spanish dialect?

citation needed (Steve Shasta), Friday, 7 October 2011 19:52 (fourteen years ago)

pretty close but I think it's more similar to "dinobear"

frogbs, Friday, 7 October 2011 19:53 (fourteen years ago)

hot shit

similar to "dinobear" (remy bean), Friday, 7 October 2011 19:56 (fourteen years ago)

dude sounds like he's been gay his entire life and got stuck in a straight marriage b/c of denial and remains in denial

omar little, Friday, 7 October 2011 19:58 (fourteen years ago)

yeah but i'm still going to read all his blog posts tho

⚓ (gr8080), Friday, 7 October 2011 20:03 (fourteen years ago)

Entertaining and fucked-up people = My set of friends

As for intelligent people... well, maybe it's time for a Venn diagram.

DSMOS has arrived (kenan), Saturday, 8 October 2011 08:28 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.