darren aronofsky's black swan

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmraonoCMkI

_________________ (cozen), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 08:30 (fifteen years ago)

yeah this will be a fun one

FRIDGED WAG MANPAIN syndrome (zorn_bond.mp3), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 08:42 (fifteen years ago)

will it?

Zeno, Wednesday, 18 August 2010 09:55 (fifteen years ago)

Looks like Single White Female.

Melissa W, Wednesday, 18 August 2010 09:59 (fifteen years ago)

just happy to see aronofsky back in "wtf is going on right now" mode

and bloodshot eyes natalie gave me the heebie jeebies

funny hats were good enough for monk, goddamit! (zorn_bond.mp3), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 10:03 (fifteen years ago)

single winged female

just sayin, Wednesday, 18 August 2010 10:04 (fifteen years ago)

(Single White Female + Gaslight) x Fatal Attraction?

a mix of music (Lionel Ritchie) and kicks (my tongue) (Phil D.), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 11:10 (fifteen years ago)

Thought this was going to be something do with Black Swan theory. It still might, who knows?

Can't go wrong with Vincent Cassel, I guess.

James Mitchell, Wednesday, 18 August 2010 14:23 (fifteen years ago)

K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S /

Becky Facelift, Wednesday, 18 August 2010 14:25 (fifteen years ago)

xp lol i thought that too--i was like first moneyball and now this?

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 18 August 2010 14:26 (fifteen years ago)

I love the trailer, so creepy.

ô_o (Nicole), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 15:22 (fifteen years ago)

so is there something actually supernatural going on here or is nat port gonna be revealed to be lol crazy or is this gonna be one of those "crazy person is out to get protagonist but no one believes them" movies?

strongohulkingtonsghost, Wednesday, 18 August 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I think that's the movie

conrad, Wednesday, 18 August 2010 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

Not supernatural, according to Aronofsky - just headfucks galore.

Haunted Clocks For Sale (Dorianlynskey), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 20:48 (fifteen years ago)

i suspect this is gonna be a "Crazy person is out to get crazy protagonist" movie

funny hats were good enough for monk, goddamit! (zorn_bond.mp3), Wednesday, 18 August 2010 20:59 (fifteen years ago)

This is looking suitably batshit, I wanna see it.

Mr Bungleow (Trayce), Thursday, 19 August 2010 00:08 (fifteen years ago)

so it's mila kunis making out with nat port? um probably gonna see this

sonderangerbot, Thursday, 19 August 2010 00:23 (fifteen years ago)

omg all these reviews, i'm so excited!

“A perfect film that blends The Red Shoes with Antichrist, via Cronenberg.”

christopher dullan (Tape Store), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:58 (fifteen years ago)

I keep reading comparisons to Repulsion, and I love Repulsion.

(¬_¬) (Nicole), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

this can't be any freakier than just watching a ballet

goole, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

It's Swan Lake + Showgirls.

like an ant to a crumb (DavidM), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 18:50 (fifteen years ago)

also seeing lots of argento (esp Suspiria and Opera) in the trailer

Ward Fowler, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)

nat's reflection turning around to look at her is the best part of this

ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 23:22 (fifteen years ago)

trailer

ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 23:22 (fifteen years ago)

think it's a 'one of them doesn't rly exist' movie

i am legernd (history mayne), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 23:23 (fifteen years ago)

i thought i read that there was an actual taleb 'black swan' movie in production.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 23:27 (fifteen years ago)

will youtube the bits with mila kunis and natalie portman kissing.

Efraqueen Juárez (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 23:36 (fifteen years ago)

if you were to ask traders before the financial crisis whether you would have seen kunis portman makeout,
they would have said it couldn't happen, that there were breakers in place to prevent it from ever happening.

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 1 September 2010 23:40 (fifteen years ago)

It's Swan Lake + Showgirls.

― like an ant to a crumb (DavidM), Thursday, September 2, 2010 2:50 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark

this line sold me tbh

shorn_blond.avi (dayo), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 23:46 (fifteen years ago)

but this looks kinda bleh. I feel like I've already seen the movie from just watching the trailer. glad to see natalie portman has wisely used her free time to not take acting classes.

shorn_blond.avi (dayo), Wednesday, 1 September 2010 23:48 (fifteen years ago)

think it's a 'one of them doesn't rly exist' movie

I noticed that Portman and Kunis characters look quite similar, at least in the trailer, so I had the same thought. But surely the "main character doesn't exist" twist has become so tired after 6th Sense and Fight Club that Aronofsky wouldn't use it?

Tuomas, Thursday, 2 September 2010 06:18 (fifteen years ago)

lol philip nunez

symsymsym, Thursday, 2 September 2010 07:12 (fifteen years ago)

preview looks great, but yeah, i'm worried now that y'all have incepted me with the idea that it will revolve around some lame identity/reality twist. still looks great.

a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 07:14 (fifteen years ago)

Anyone else read the script? There was a version of it on the BFI website for a while.

James Mitchell, Thursday, 2 September 2010 07:42 (fifteen years ago)

yeeks. not gonna look at this thread again until i see it.

a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 07:44 (fifteen years ago)

(which kinda stands to reason)

a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Thursday, 2 September 2010 07:44 (fifteen years ago)

No spoilers before the movie is in the cinemas, please.

Tuomas, Thursday, 2 September 2010 07:48 (fifteen years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/UMT1u.jpg

no time for the prussian death cult (nakhchivan), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 19:50 (fifteen years ago)

seeing it on friday

the movie will be in at least one cinema on that day!

snrub-n-tug (s1ocki), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 20:03 (fifteen years ago)

I have a good feeling about this one, based on post-Venice buzz and the trailer/images out there. Unfortunately only out over here in Feb of next year, although I'm sure history mayne will be in there before us.

Davek (davek_00), Tuesday, 7 September 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

Via Karina Longworth:

BLACK SWAN = balletsploitation. Should be in Midnight Madness. Total trash, but so fun.

Sounds brilliant!

Ned Raggett, Friday, 10 September 2010 15:47 (fifteen years ago)

really psyched for this

just sayin, Friday, 10 September 2010 15:49 (fifteen years ago)

Darren Aronofsky - the new Ken Russell?

Chooglin'alCarbon, Friday, 10 September 2010 22:53 (fifteen years ago)

i was kind of into this

it's a really pretentious melodramatic ballet psychodrama

but like, if you're going to make a melodramatic ballet psychodrama, i feel like you are allowed to go all-out and get as pretentious as you like. i'd rather see this kind of treatment given a ballet movie than like, a movie about Drug Addiction and Society.

snrub-n-tug (s1ocki), Friday, 10 September 2010 23:04 (fifteen years ago)

pretty fun to watch. portman is wicked.

snrub-n-tug (s1ocki), Friday, 10 September 2010 23:04 (fifteen years ago)

Is she necked?

Olde Executioner 8hundo (Eazy), Friday, 10 September 2010 23:50 (fifteen years ago)

no kinda wimps out on that

snrub-n-tug (s1ocki), Saturday, 11 September 2010 01:09 (fifteen years ago)

but like, if you're going to make a melodramatic ballet psychodrama, i feel like you are allowed to go all-out and get as pretentious as you like. i'd rather see this kind of treatment given a ballet movie than like, a movie about Drug Addiction and Society.

― snrub-n-tug (s1ocki), Saturday, September 11, 2010 12:04 AM (15 hours ago) Bookmark

sooo otm

just sayin, Saturday, 11 September 2010 14:20 (fifteen years ago)

http://blogs.indiewire.com/thompsononhollywood/2010/09/15/interview_darren_aronofsky_talks_black_swan/

(there is a spoiler right at the end, but it's flagged up)

caek, Wednesday, 15 September 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

Total trash, but so fun.

grinds teeth

history mayne, Wednesday, 15 September 2010 15:36 (fifteen years ago)

smiles

how to train your dagon (s1ocki), Wednesday, 15 September 2010 19:38 (fifteen years ago)

s10ck otm

I was actually cackling evilly when it was over.

Simon H., Wednesday, 15 September 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

two months pass...

David Edelstein: "a Roman Polanski remake of Showgirls"

(doesn't think that's good)

I havent had time to watch my screener.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

That makes it sound like my dream movie! I will have to do a compare/contrast w/Burlesque, which I should finally be seeing on Friday.

THX THO... (Nicole), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

ya that's a pretty accurate descriptiopn

(in a good way)

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

OMG, that's the first blurb I've seen on the movie that makes me want to see it.

Miss Garrote (Eric H.), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

(Choosing to ignore Ed's 2-star review for the moment.)

Miss Garrote (Eric H.), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

I'm first in line.

look at it, pwn3d, made u look at my peen/vadge (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

are you posting from the line?

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 16:39 (fifteen years ago)

Morbs (and any other crits), try to hold out for a theater showing unless you have a huge TV.

Simon H., Wednesday, 1 December 2010 16:59 (fifteen years ago)

I thought of u first, Eric :)

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 1 December 2010 17:19 (fifteen years ago)

I've got a big spoiler-ish question, but I'll wait a bit to ask it.

Saw this yesterday and mostly enjoyed it, especially the parts that resembled The Wrestler than Requiem.

Been thinking about how the Portman character here has a lot of parallel's with The Social Network's Zuckerberg -- both "types" (maybe even diagnostically so), ambitious and stunted, that are familiar from life but not from literature or film.

Before seeing it, I had scanned the (annoying) NY Times review without reading it closely and thought I had read a third-act spoiler, but Darghis meant the real Web, not a movie one:
Mr. Aronofsky is simultaneously telling that story straight, playing with the suffering-artist stereotype and having his nasty way with Nina, burdening her with trippy psychodrama and letting her run wild in a sexcapade that will soon be in heavy rotation on the Web.

A Toast to the Horshacks/Dvořáks (Eazy), Saturday, 4 December 2010 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

was sold out everywhere last nite :(

hopefully I have more luck today

no hipster hats (The Brainwasher), Saturday, 4 December 2010 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

try to hold out for a theater showing unless you have a huge TV.

in a perfect world, sure; I have a list to make this week, no time.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 4 December 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

Best scene is when Natalie Portman quits the ballet and takes a job behind the deli counter of a supermarket but cracks when recognized as the former lead ballerina.

A Toast to the Horshacks/Dvořáks (Eazy), Saturday, 4 December 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)

darren aronofsky's boar's head

buzza, Saturday, 4 December 2010 18:44 (fifteen years ago)

argh the girl really wants to see this but I think it looks terrible

iatee, Saturday, 4 December 2010 18:48 (fifteen years ago)

best scene is when natalie portman sees herself in the mirror then shes not sure if its really herself then she smashes the mirror but then youre not sure if its real then what is real anyway then the mirror is not smashed so it wasnt real then or wasnt it, natalie portman and the girl from the 70s show are hot ballerinas

ice cr?m, Saturday, 4 December 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

no j/k best scene is when they lez out

ice cr?m, Saturday, 4 December 2010 19:44 (fifteen years ago)

is there a lot of actual ballet? I don't mind mirror smashing I guess, but scary ballet movie just sounds like the worst thing in the world

iatee, Saturday, 4 December 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

lol i didnt see this shit, what do u take me for

ice cr?m, Saturday, 4 December 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

damn you're lucky

I'm probably gonna have to

iatee, Saturday, 4 December 2010 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

Vincent Cassel will change your mind.

A Toast to the Horshacks/Dvořáks (Eazy), Saturday, 4 December 2010 19:50 (fifteen years ago)

try to think of something u know yr girl h8s to see in movies like spiders crawling up someones nose or whatever and tell her this movie has that

ice cr?m, Saturday, 4 December 2010 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

Anatomy of a Scene short video

A Toast to the Horshacks/Dvořáks (Eazy), Saturday, 4 December 2010 19:52 (fifteen years ago)

that's a good idea actually xp

iatee, Saturday, 4 December 2010 19:53 (fifteen years ago)

try to think of something u know yr girl h8s to see in movies like spiders crawling up someones nose or whatever and tell her this movie has that

Or tell her Mila Kunis is in it.

Miss Garrote (Eric H.), Saturday, 4 December 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

in fact read the entire cast list to her

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Saturday, 4 December 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)

tell her its abt that pop economics book, mila kunis plays the bald bearded fund manager

ice cr?m, Saturday, 4 December 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

these are all good suggestions

was also considering having her watch 'pi'

iatee, Saturday, 4 December 2010 20:05 (fifteen years ago)

that should do it

ice cr?m, Saturday, 4 December 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

have her eat a 'pie'

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Saturday, 4 December 2010 20:06 (fifteen years ago)

here eat this pi

ice cr?m, Saturday, 4 December 2010 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

listen to this requiem. it is for a dream, iirc

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Saturday, 4 December 2010 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

act really excited to about 'hard lesbian' scenes

Ian Riese-Moran (rip van wanko), Saturday, 4 December 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

to about

Ian Riese-Moran (rip van wanko), Saturday, 4 December 2010 20:24 (fifteen years ago)

lots of good strategies but I'm going w/ 'pi and pie night'

iatee, Saturday, 4 December 2010 20:29 (fifteen years ago)

wait nvm that means I have to watch pi too

iatee, Saturday, 4 December 2010 20:30 (fifteen years ago)

maybe it should be 'pi or pie night'

ice cr?m, Saturday, 4 December 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)

this looks as camp-awesome as Notes on a Scandal.

look at it, pwn3d, made u look at my peen/vadge (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 4 December 2010 21:06 (fifteen years ago)

This is supposed to have the Tree of Life trailer before it.

LaMonte, Saturday, 4 December 2010 21:52 (fifteen years ago)

I really really want to see this now.

Square-Panted Sponge Robert (VegemiteGrrrl), Saturday, 4 December 2010 22:05 (fifteen years ago)

about to see this in an hour, will report back! it sounded so delightfully over the top..

daria-g, Sunday, 5 December 2010 00:45 (fifteen years ago)

I just saw the Youtube video of the Perfect Blue/Requiem For A Dream homage scene a few weeks ago, and then read that this is heavily indebted. Is it? I like the idea of Perfect Blue/Red Shoes.

Over 1000 in rhyme (ajd), Sunday, 5 December 2010 02:26 (fifteen years ago)

i don't know! i haven't seen any aronofsky other than 'pi'.

anyway, CLASSIC

it's kind of amazing how aware he is of the subtle ways women undermine other women. obviously it isn't subtle by the end! but it wouldn't work so well if it didn't start out that way. also it wasn't any trouble at all to me to realize which scenes weren't real.

daria-g, Sunday, 5 December 2010 05:23 (fifteen years ago)

i saw this movie tonight and honestly liked it a lot -- but i could seriously look at natalie portman for hours and hours and be happy looking at different parts of her face
it was campy enough and vincent c didn't even seen to go fully over the top sleazy like he could
can we talk about noni? did i miss this part of the thread?

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Sunday, 5 December 2010 05:33 (fifteen years ago)

obvs seen = seem
love that vc but his fake teeth contrasted strongly with natalie's noticeably normal real teeth

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Sunday, 5 December 2010 05:36 (fifteen years ago)

This is supposed to have the Tree of Life trailer before it.
it did
if the trailer is to be believed it appears to be a movie about how children make our lives meaningful and also poisonous gas

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Sunday, 5 December 2010 05:41 (fifteen years ago)

Thought it looked like it was about how children with gas make our lives poisonous.

Miss Garrote (Eric H.), Sunday, 5 December 2010 05:59 (fifteen years ago)

girl brought up seeing the movie like 3x tonight

when I told her about pi she said it also sounded good

doomed

iatee, Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:02 (fifteen years ago)

deal

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:03 (fifteen years ago)

Time to break it off.

Miss Garrote (Eric H.), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:03 (fifteen years ago)

Or else compromise and tell her she has to go watch your favorite movie next week: The Facts of Life Go to Australia.

Miss Garrote (Eric H.), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:04 (fifteen years ago)

no way dude -- this movie was totally enjoyable!
i hope you're all kidding -- and I have seen The Facts of Life Go to Australia. That's where they meet Pippa, the annoying late-season show reviver

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:05 (fifteen years ago)

anybody who breaks up with his girlfriend because she wants to see this (good) movie, prob doesnt deserve to have one.

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:08 (fifteen years ago)

Is that the season where they had Pippa and Jo lez out in the back room of the candy shop?

Miss Garrote (Eric H.), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:09 (fifteen years ago)

iirc by that time it was called "Over Our Heads" and was mostly novelty items (and also candy, but stuff like lunchboxes! and jellybean containers!) -- I don't remember any lezzing out, but who knows about what happened in the back room?!? i hated pippa.

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:13 (fifteen years ago)

when I said 'doomed' I meant me not my relationship, cause I prob don't have a choice at this point

iatee, Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:14 (fifteen years ago)

xp - she was worse than andy! but this movie? it's waaay better than that.

iatee you will like this movie in spite of your feelings atm

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:14 (fifteen years ago)

Tbh, you sound kind of like a shitty boyfriend. Sometimes you have to do stuff you don't want to do, its called compromise and part of a grown-up relationship.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:17 (fifteen years ago)

dang y'all it's also a good movie

who has actually seen this movie? can we talk about noni!!? she looked so totally disheveled. i realize that this faded flower look was part of her role, but she seemed to really inhabit that side of her character. her hair was in her face for every scene, and barbara hershey got way more closeups than noni did.

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:17 (fifteen years ago)

it was hard to even recognize her -- recognizing her was part of the fun tbh -- and she was the helen lawson but didn't even get to whip off her wig
what gives

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:20 (fifteen years ago)

I understand that jon! which is why in the end I'm gonna see this dreadful movie and not break up with my long-term gf!

iatee, Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:20 (fifteen years ago)

but also cause the pi strategy didn't work

iatee, Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:21 (fifteen years ago)

http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd120/hipsterrunoff/photographs/hro/63dc0fe1.jpg

ice cr?m, Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:22 (fifteen years ago)

i saw this movie and liked it so

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:28 (fifteen years ago)

likely

ice cr?m, Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:36 (fifteen years ago)

So here's my ***SPOILER*** (though vague). Given what's real and what's possibly not real, this is kind of a hardcore movie about method acting. As in: are there any real external events that allow her to fully realize the role she wants to play, or does she (as Lee Strasberg and others have trained actors to do) just conjure the emotions necessary to play the role? Like, is this a movie in which no external events actually contribute to her transformation, assuming that she wasn't actually fingerbanged in the back of a taxicab?

would like a calmer set (Eazy), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:43 (fifteen years ago)

Like, Stanislavski defined acting as "behaving truthfully under imaginary circumstances." And a standard approach actors take is, say, "at the top of this scene, imagine that you've just found out that your brother -- you and your real brother -- that you've just found out that your brother died." Or: to play this scene, imagine that you find out that your wife/husband has been cheating on you. Now play it. That may be all she does in this movie.

would like a calmer set (Eazy), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:45 (fifteen years ago)

Wish Mila Kunis was featured in all the ads instead of Natty Portman. She's way hotter.

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:46 (fifteen years ago)

I like Pi, never get the h8 for it.

Frank Lloyd Webber (Trayce), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:47 (fifteen years ago)

P.S. I'm now imagining Darren Aranofsky's The Facts of Life, with a decrepit, creepy, painkiller-addicted Mrs. Garrett and Jo having tats and toys.

would like a calmer set (Eazy), Sunday, 5 December 2010 06:48 (fifteen years ago)

What about Natalie and Tootie? Exiled for being comic relief?
Whether or not this is a big statement about method acting or a story about ballerinas losing their shit, it's still v enjoyable.

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Sunday, 5 December 2010 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

I don't know anything about ballet but in video above Natalie Portman does not dance very convincingly imo. She looks sort of awkward and stiff.

ball (Hurting 2), Sunday, 5 December 2010 19:00 (fifteen years ago)

Can't wait for Aronofsky film about drunkorexia, btw.

ball (Hurting 2), Sunday, 5 December 2010 19:02 (fifteen years ago)

xp She looks stiff in the rehearsal scenes, but once it gets to the final performance it's like totally WOW.

Davek (davek_00), Sunday, 5 December 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

i believe that is kind of the story arc of the film

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Sunday, 5 December 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)

:p

Davek (davek_00), Sunday, 5 December 2010 19:15 (fifteen years ago)

Or maybe it was just the amazing camerawork and music papering over the flaws..

Davek (davek_00), Sunday, 5 December 2010 19:17 (fifteen years ago)

didnt they jus like cgi her face on an actual dancer - feel like i heard that

ice cr?m, Sunday, 5 December 2010 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

no

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Sunday, 5 December 2010 19:25 (fifteen years ago)

yeah p sure that did slki

ice cr?m, Sunday, 5 December 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

but her head is SUPPOSED to look 1.5x too big for the body it's on

ball (Hurting 2), Sunday, 5 December 2010 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

She definitely did 90% of the dancing but used the CGI face thing for the most demanding scenes.

The baby boomers have defined everything once and for all (Dorianlynskey), Sunday, 5 December 2010 20:38 (fifteen years ago)

lol this is hilarious and insane, a++ exploitation for sure

call all destroyer, Sunday, 5 December 2010 21:38 (fifteen years ago)

aronofsky will NEVER do better than this

call all destroyer, Sunday, 5 December 2010 21:40 (fifteen years ago)

yeah this is totally unsettling

i like that everyone is calling this polanski + showgirls (which it is) but its also basically just pi but instead of math ballet and instead of jews hot chicks and instead of a brain in the subway mila kunis going down on you

max, Monday, 6 December 2010 00:35 (fifteen years ago)

who has actually seen this movie? can we talk about noni!!? she looked so totally disheveled. i realize that this faded flower look was part of her role, but she seemed to really inhabit that side of her character. her hair was in her face for every scene, and barbara hershey got way more closeups than noni did.

― ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Sunday, December 5, 2010 1:17 AM (18 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah she was like unrecognizable. good in her scenes tho, i flipped when she started stabbing herself in the face, FLIPPED i tell u

max, Monday, 6 December 2010 00:36 (fifteen years ago)

totally, i flipped and kind of screamed

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 6 December 2010 00:41 (fifteen years ago)

i really like this movie (even tho i have issues with it! but i have issues with all of aronofsky's movies - they are trumped by my fascination with aronofsky's fascinations)

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 6 December 2010 00:42 (fifteen years ago)

(lol braggin/o_O - i am actually wearing my black swan hoodie right now b/c i wore it to yoga earlier today (media swag hahaa))

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 6 December 2010 00:45 (fifteen years ago)

wearing it... 2 cover up ur rash

max, Monday, 6 December 2010 00:46 (fifteen years ago)

i spent the whole movie trying to figure out which character didnt exist, and was so sure it was the mom, and then it turned out that they all existed :-/

max, Monday, 6 December 2010 00:47 (fifteen years ago)

none of them exist max, shape up

ice cr?m, Monday, 6 December 2010 00:48 (fifteen years ago)

it has bell sleeves for ingenue-like hiding of hands
xps

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 6 December 2010 00:48 (fifteen years ago)

haha

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 6 December 2010 00:49 (fifteen years ago)

t/s: the part when winona rider stabs her face vs. the part when natalie portman peels her finger skin off

max, Monday, 6 December 2010 00:50 (fifteen years ago)

the best moment in the movie is when she's in the elevator and looks down and SHE's holding the scalpel

oh and the masturbating/mom sleeping "scary reveal" shot is probably the best thing DA has ever ever done

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 00:50 (fifteen years ago)

haha yeah the "mom in the room" moment is basically the scariest moment of the entire movie

max, Monday, 6 December 2010 00:53 (fifteen years ago)

really inspired moment imo

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 00:54 (fifteen years ago)

lot of crotch-stroking in this movie

max, Monday, 6 December 2010 00:55 (fifteen years ago)

i squirmed uncomfortably and stifled screams at all those scenes holy geez
mom in room scene definitely freakiest - lol psychothriller getting to teh heart of our real fears

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 6 December 2010 00:58 (fifteen years ago)

lol this movie was awesome.

Gukbe, Monday, 6 December 2010 01:01 (fifteen years ago)

lot of crotch-stroking in this movie

― max, Sunday, December 5, 2010 7:55 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark

surprised you weren't kicked out of the theater tbh

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 01:03 (fifteen years ago)

loved this movie

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Monday, 6 December 2010 01:13 (fifteen years ago)

I never saw it but I know I'll hate it so I guess I thought I would post

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Monday, 6 December 2010 01:13 (fifteen years ago)

strokonofsky

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 6 December 2010 01:16 (fifteen years ago)

and then i turned... AND MY MOM WAS SITTING RIGHT NEXT TO ME IN THE THEATER... AND THEN BLOOD STARTING POOURING INTO THE WATER

max, Monday, 6 December 2010 01:17 (fifteen years ago)

glad there is finally some truth on this thread

it's not like i don't have problems with this movie, but you put a bunch of women in a ballet movie and there are going to be problems (unless you're wiseman, and even then?)

STILL fun range of emotions to be felt here, and so many crotches to be felt as well

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Monday, 6 December 2010 01:19 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, most of my issues with his movies are abt his treatment of women...

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 6 December 2010 01:20 (fifteen years ago)

had a big argument with some other crits when i saw this about whether this movie has a sense of humour about itself. i say it does. (main example: the big monstrous dude saying "hey." backstage in the middle of the madness)

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 01:22 (fifteen years ago)

i guess the reason is works is because it's campy, and for me camp trumps reality and basically always wins.

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Monday, 6 December 2010 01:23 (fifteen years ago)

somehow i think that relates to the method acting comment way above and not taking everything so seriously, and yet at the same time, being totally and completely dedicated: i was thinking about this too, as his films all deal in transformation, specifically physical but totally tied with mental, and so the main actors must transform their bodies significantly and go through the rigour of that process (hm, he's also into presenting altered versions of known actors, esp those we haven't seen in a while). so, it's not method acting but it seems like a deeper investment than a lot of films would ask of actors - and we're aware of this when watching. also interesting: aronofsky actually said to press that he's not a fan of method acting and can't deal with method actors.

xp

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 6 December 2010 01:24 (fifteen years ago)

overly serious/sincere reviews of this are hilarious

call all destroyer, Monday, 6 December 2010 01:25 (fifteen years ago)

dedicated to camp too - only way camp is pulled off imo!
xp

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 6 December 2010 01:25 (fifteen years ago)

(main example: the big monstrous dude saying "hey." backstage in the middle of the madness)

yes!!!! i'm pretty surprised at how many ppl seem to think that this is a "serious" movie in that way. represents a major breakthrough for aronofsky in terms of self-awareness.

call all destroyer, Monday, 6 December 2010 01:26 (fifteen years ago)

women win with camp

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Monday, 6 December 2010 01:27 (fifteen years ago)

earnest goes to camp: the significance of "the black swan" in darren aronofsky's filmography

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 01:31 (fifteen years ago)

hahaaa
i am never going back to school

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 6 December 2010 01:33 (fifteen years ago)

Old man in audience, during subway scene where old man starts coming on to Portman: "That's me!"
Old man in audience after old man onscreen starts fondling himself: "That's not me."
VERY good to know.

Chris L, Monday, 6 December 2010 01:56 (fifteen years ago)

lol

call all destroyer, Monday, 6 December 2010 01:56 (fifteen years ago)

audience i saw this with laughed heartily a fair number of times. also woman behind me was shrieking a lot.

Gukbe, Monday, 6 December 2010 02:21 (fifteen years ago)

THAT WAS YOU

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 02:22 (fifteen years ago)

oh i laughed all the way through

call all destroyer, Monday, 6 December 2010 02:29 (fifteen years ago)

had a big argument with some other crits when i saw this about whether this movie has a sense of humour about itself.

yeah, I agree it totally does. It's easily his least self-serious movie.

Simon H., Monday, 6 December 2010 02:42 (fifteen years ago)

i am hoping this marks the dawn of a serious hag horror revival

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Monday, 6 December 2010 02:46 (fifteen years ago)

thought Portman was great in this.

Gukbe, Monday, 6 December 2010 02:52 (fifteen years ago)

ya for some reason i keep coming back to the moment in the toilet stall where she calls barbara hershey to tell her she got the part...

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 02:53 (fifteen years ago)

argh s1ocki when is yr website going to be back online i am going crazy over here

sean gramophone, Monday, 6 December 2010 02:56 (fifteen years ago)

i know, everyone is, twitter is gonna be the first to know

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 02:56 (fifteen years ago)

two years ago stacie ponder calls for hag horror revival to follow zombie and vampire trends
http://www.filmcritic.com/features/2008/11/hag-horror-movies/

please tell me this is finally happening
noni leading the charge

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Monday, 6 December 2010 02:59 (fifteen years ago)

http://grab.by/7Kfj

ice cr?m, Monday, 6 December 2010 03:19 (fifteen years ago)

it's not just you

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 03:28 (fifteen years ago)

:(

ice cr?m, Monday, 6 December 2010 03:32 (fifteen years ago)

do u think mila kunis took ur site down to sabotage u

max, Monday, 6 December 2010 03:33 (fifteen years ago)

we're all sticking together in this - the gang's all on twitter. we're gonna make it thru

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 03:33 (fifteen years ago)

do u think mila kunis took ur site down to sabotage u

― max, Sunday, December 5, 2010 10:33 PM (9 seconds ago) Bookmark

i don't even want to "go there"

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 03:34 (fifteen years ago)

maybe its all in our head, maybe twitter doesnt exist

ice cr?m, Monday, 6 December 2010 03:35 (fifteen years ago)

i wont think that i cant think that

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 03:36 (fifteen years ago)

It's easily his least self-serious movie.

― Simon H., Monday, 6 December 2010 02:42 (7 hours ago) Bookmark

I couldn't do a precise enough gis of a tree growing out of hugh jackman so instead i'll just rmde

purblind snowcock splattered (a hoy hoy), Monday, 6 December 2010 10:20 (fifteen years ago)

at what exactly - we're saying it's LESS self-important, shouldn't a DA hater be happy about that? (i was never a fan for those reasons tbh)

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 13:21 (fifteen years ago)

I'm cool with this movie. The world needs more frigid characters imo.

Miss Garrote (Eric H.), Monday, 6 December 2010 14:12 (fifteen years ago)

Between this and The Social Network, it's the year of the frigid character.

would like a calmer set (Eazy), Monday, 6 December 2010 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

http://mydisguises.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Mr_Freeze.jpg

shirley summistake (s1ocki), Monday, 6 December 2010 17:25 (fifteen years ago)

It's Natalie's upper body but the star dancer from New York City Ballet's lower body. The Times wrote a big thing about it.

Virginia Plain, Tuesday, 7 December 2010 04:26 (fifteen years ago)

Friend of a friend on Facebook: "Portman's the new Kinski. The only question is whether she's going for Klaus or Natassja..."

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 8 December 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

This is the equivalent of a Merchant-Ivory film for high-end trashmongers.

Mila Kunis kinda saved it for me, a la Armie Hammer in The Social Network.

Please tell me audiences are laughing through the last 20 minutes.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 December 2010 17:15 (fifteen years ago)

I have one friend who has seen this; she loved it and said that she basically laughed through the entire movie.

BO (DJP), Friday, 10 December 2010 17:32 (fifteen years ago)

30 rock black swan gag was killing me last night. especially that duet at the end. so beautiful.

scott seward, Friday, 10 December 2010 17:33 (fifteen years ago)

I wish Will Forte had been the Black Swan in the movie now.

THX THO... (Nicole), Friday, 10 December 2010 17:35 (fifteen years ago)

This is the equivalent of a Merchant-Ivory film for high-end trashmongers.

YES.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 10 December 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

Is that a gold-plated paper-stabber you're holding?

Was really rooting for Nat-Port to sprout full-blown black feathers.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 December 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

she did

Gukbe, Friday, 10 December 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

covered in 'em

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 December 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

Sober realists can step this way for the Wiseman ballet doc

manic pixie dream police (s1ocki), Friday, 10 December 2010 19:35 (fifteen years ago)

I have one friend who has seen this; she loved it and said that she basically laughed through the entire movie.

― BO (DJP), Friday, December 10, 2010 12:32 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark

yup

call all destroyer, Friday, 10 December 2010 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

hoping Anne Hathaway does ribald parody in tutu on Oscars

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 December 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

Hoping Franco wears swan outfit at Oscars.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 10 December 2010 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

also needed to pursue Carrie parallels with mass slaughter of Lincoln Center audience finale

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 December 2010 19:45 (fifteen years ago)

we'll probably just get mike myers in one

xp

goole, Friday, 10 December 2010 19:46 (fifteen years ago)

and expected last twist that Nat was dancing on Shutter Island.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 December 2010 19:49 (fifteen years ago)

personally i was hoping big bird would show up but

manic pixie dream police (s1ocki), Friday, 10 December 2010 20:00 (fifteen years ago)

Please tell me audiences are laughing through the last 20 minutes.

The whole movie, actually. In the good way. I presume you did too, because you're not humorless. Are you?

benanas foster (Eric H.), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

Sober realists can step this way for the Wiseman ballet doc

He has one for people to be boring about The Fighter with, too! He's become quite the documentarian ambulance chaser.

benanas foster (Eric H.), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:16 (fifteen years ago)

o that's right

manic pixie dream police (s1ocki), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:28 (fifteen years ago)

looking forward to his 2011 offering Transformer Home Base

manic pixie dream police (s1ocki), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:29 (fifteen years ago)

Well sitting home alone I laughed at it maybe 3 times. It kinda sucks, being a horror film and all.

If the Academy gets it into the Best Picture 10, it won't be bcz they think it's funny.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:30 (fifteen years ago)

it's not actually a horror film.

manic pixie dream police (s1ocki), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:31 (fifteen years ago)

it's a flamboyant bloody extravagant psychodrama about BALLET ffs

manic pixie dream police (s1ocki), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:31 (fifteen years ago)

Frederick Wiseman's Garden Of Eden Tree

benanas foster (Eric H.), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:32 (fifteen years ago)

psychoSEXUAL psychodrama

max, Friday, 10 December 2010 21:32 (fifteen years ago)

I did not recognize the writers' names -- 3 credits seem to indicate this was kicking around for years before Aronofsky got hold of it, yeah?

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:40 (fifteen years ago)

apparently he first talked to portman about it in like 2001

max, Friday, 10 December 2010 21:43 (fifteen years ago)

so these writers all worked w/ him? or preceded 2001?

I am adding D.A. to the list of directors whose first two films are likely to remain their best (Darren, meet Sofia).

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

ew this and the wrestler are so much better than "requiem for a dream," i mean come on, you want unintentional comedy

manic pixie dream police (s1ocki), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

i'll take a pretentious, ridiculous extravaganza about ballet any day over a pretentious, ridiculous, totally self-serious extravaganza about ADDICTION in AMERICA

manic pixie dream police (s1ocki), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

xxpost Sofia, knock boots with Burton.

benanas foster (Eric H.), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

The Wrestler : straight guys and wish-they-were straight guys :: Black Swan : gay guys and frigid guys and maybe women too, but who asks them?

benanas foster (Eric H.), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

i really liked requiem for a dream. it was exactly like the book. which would seem to be a hard thing to pull off.

scott seward, Friday, 10 December 2010 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

I only found Requiem ridiculously overwrought in the last 10 minutes.

cmon Eric, Burton's best movies are Mars Attacks and Sweeney Todd.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:55 (fifteen years ago)

i finally saw the wrestler recently. i got kinda bored.

scott seward, Friday, 10 December 2010 21:56 (fifteen years ago)

a few scenes aside yeah it's pretty boring.

fuckin magnates, why don't they work (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:56 (fifteen years ago)

about as boring as "Wild Orchid"

fuckin magnates, why don't they work (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:57 (fifteen years ago)

i really liked requiem for a dream. it was exactly like the book. which would seem to be a hard thing to pull off.

really? didn't jibe with my memory of the book at all really

fuckin magnates, why don't they work (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 10 December 2010 21:57 (fifteen years ago)

that hallucinatory quality. the feel of it. i felt like it was pretty faithful. and just as weird, really. most hollywood types would have totally hacked it up.

scott seward, Friday, 10 December 2010 22:02 (fifteen years ago)

requiem sucks except for this part

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oa5z77EI8y0

wrestler owned, gonna see this tonight or tomorrow i think

Princess TamTam, Friday, 10 December 2010 22:05 (fifteen years ago)

I know it followed the major plot points pretty faithfully, the film just seemed so over-hyper to me. it gave me a headache.

fuckin magnates, why don't they work (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 10 December 2010 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

gonna take a date and give her a leering wink when mila kunis is knuckle-deep in natalie portman http://www.gmodforums.com/images/sasmilies/emot-kiddo.gif

Princess TamTam, Friday, 10 December 2010 22:15 (fifteen years ago)

lol @ ass2ass, most ridiculous scene of the 00s?

manic pixie dream police (s1ocki), Friday, 10 December 2010 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

Realest scene.

benanas foster (Eric H.), Friday, 10 December 2010 22:21 (fifteen years ago)

:O

manic pixie dream police (s1ocki), Friday, 10 December 2010 22:21 (fifteen years ago)

i think we've all been there.

scott seward, Friday, 10 December 2010 22:33 (fifteen years ago)

Seeing this tmrw night - pretty glad to hear it's got some Wrestler in it since I loved that and kind of hated requiem.

˙❤‿❤˙˙❤‿❤˙ (ENBB), Friday, 10 December 2010 22:58 (fifteen years ago)

its kind of like wrestler 2: lady wrestler

manic pixie dream police (s1ocki), Friday, 10 December 2010 23:03 (fifteen years ago)

sweet

˙❤‿❤˙˙❤‿❤˙ (ENBB), Friday, 10 December 2010 23:04 (fifteen years ago)

Red Shoes/Repulsion is about right, except those are good.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 10 December 2010 23:15 (fifteen years ago)

lol Morbs entered this thread. he's wrong, btw

Gukbe, Saturday, 11 December 2010 07:46 (fifteen years ago)

this movie blew

mercy mercy me, that beanfield milagro (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 12 December 2010 04:34 (fifteen years ago)

Liked it just as much the second time around. I'm more than just cool with this movie.

benanas foster (Eric H.), Sunday, 12 December 2010 04:49 (fifteen years ago)

Almost walked out because the trailers thought I was the type of person that would be interested in whatever the fuck Tree Of Life is

mercy mercy me, that beanfield milagro (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 12 December 2010 04:52 (fifteen years ago)

OK so it HAS to have a sense of humor about itself and Slock's example of the monster dude saying hey is a good example but also the symbolism was so heavy handed throughout that I can't help but think that was to mirror visual clues in ballet and also the world as Portman's character saw it - in sort of black and white, evil v. good terms, right?

˙❤‿❤˙˙❤‿❤˙ (ENBB), Sunday, 12 December 2010 05:18 (fifteen years ago)

I mean things like Mila Kunis being the bad girl with the eyeliner, drugs and black wing tattoos were just so. I'm sure that was intentional but it sort of annoyed me a bit. I thought a lot of the stuff he did to show how fucked up ballet can be and how stressful it can be on the dancers mind/bodies was actually pretty similar to the way he showed the brutality of wrestling but I liked that a lot in both movies. Also have to say, and maybe I haven't seen her in a long time, bu

˙❤‿❤˙˙❤‿❤˙ (ENBB), Sunday, 12 December 2010 05:49 (fifteen years ago)

t damn Barbara Hershey done gone fucked up her face. Too many fillers or something. NAGL.

˙❤‿❤˙˙❤‿❤˙ (ENBB), Sunday, 12 December 2010 05:50 (fifteen years ago)

RIP Whiney xposts

Gukbe, Sunday, 12 December 2010 06:30 (fifteen years ago)

verdict: this is fucking awesome

portman's really good, better than i expected - the scene where she calls her mom to tell her she got the part was when i thought to myself 'wow she is knocking this out of the park' - its not a super fleshed out role but its a really demanding one at the same time and she pretty much nails it. also i think this is the movie where i realized mila kunis is a really good actress.

i like how the movie just simmers for the first half w/little hints of crazy then goes full freakout on u at some point with the door slamming and face stabbing and bird legs - this kind of movie's been done enough times that you can kinda anticipate most of the beats, but it was pulled off really well and just flowed nicely imo.

part where birdsuit guy goes 'hey' backstage killed me

i could say some nitpicky stuff about aronofsky's style but it's stupid and nitpicky and its a good movie who even cares

its just a super fun cool movie and if you dont like it you're probably some stupid crumbbum

Princess TamTam, Sunday, 12 December 2010 07:42 (fifteen years ago)

also the ending is sorta weirdly uplifting

Princess TamTam, Sunday, 12 December 2010 07:45 (fifteen years ago)

did anyone make a brundleswan joke yet

Princess TamTam, Sunday, 12 December 2010 07:47 (fifteen years ago)

superfuncool americanidiots

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 12 December 2010 08:05 (fifteen years ago)

lol

Princess TamTam, Sunday, 12 December 2010 08:10 (fifteen years ago)

btw, im almost positive that the creepy guy on the subway was mr. ass-to-ass from requiem for a dream

Princess TamTam, Sunday, 12 December 2010 08:19 (fifteen years ago)

somehow I assumed it was Aronofsky's dad

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 12 December 2010 08:22 (fifteen years ago)

portman's really good, better than i expected - the scene where she calls her mom to tell her she got the part was when i thought to myself 'wow she is knocking this out of the park' -

ya me too - her best scene for sure

manic pixie dream police (s1ocki), Sunday, 12 December 2010 09:45 (fifteen years ago)

The mom calling scene was great, yeah. Also agree about Kunis being a good actress - I had no idea. I've been thinking about it since we left the movie theater and, even though there were things about it that bugged me, that in and of itself has to be a good sign.

˙❤‿❤˙˙❤‿❤˙ (ENBB), Sunday, 12 December 2010 11:53 (fifteen years ago)

Almost walked out because the trailers thought I was the type of person that would be interested in whatever the fuck Tree Of Life is

― mercy mercy me, that beanfield milagro (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, December 11, 2010 11:52 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

it's so hard being you

call all destroyer, Sunday, 12 December 2010 14:07 (fifteen years ago)

must be terrible for ppl to think you like malick films :(

just sayin, Sunday, 12 December 2010 14:49 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha, I loved the New World! This just looked like the existentialism Hallmark Special. Obviously I'll have to see the movie to make a real opinion or at least wait until Morbs sees it

mercy mercy me, that beanfield milagro (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 12 December 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)

wish u had walked out during the trailers then maybe u never would have posted on this thread

max, Sunday, 12 December 2010 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

i keep telling people this movie is "hilarious" and they keep going "really?"

max, Sunday, 12 December 2010 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

it's worth more than just to lolz imo

Gukbe, Sunday, 12 December 2010 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

I'm glad you put hilarious in quotes, max, bcz this film is "very funny"

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 12 December 2010 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

Yep, this movie is TBfuckingS.

benanas foster (Eric H.), Sunday, 12 December 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

i dont know what that means but it sounds good

manic pixie dream police (s1ocki), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

turn-based strategy

max, Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)

turn-based FUCKING strategy

tickle me imo (s1ocki), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

Fuck fucking you.

benanas foster (Eric H.), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:10 (fifteen years ago)

chill dude

tickle me imo (s1ocki), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

said Barbara Hershey to her plastic surgeon

xp

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

Chill fucking dude?

benanas foster (Eric H.), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

something to aspire to

tickle me imo (s1ocki), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:13 (fifteen years ago)

You wrote the book, I'm sure. Send me a copy.

benanas foster (Eric H.), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:16 (fifteen years ago)

when you're done being butthurt, wanna explain what TBS stands for?

tickle me imo (s1ocki), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

do u get TBS in canada? their motto is 'very funny'

Princess TamTam, Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

Yep, I'll do that first thing when I'm done being butthurt.

benanas foster (Eric H.), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:19 (fifteen years ago)

*slowly backs out of room as eric seethes in his overstuffed armchair*

tickle me imo (s1ocki), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)

omg, slock, did you have a lez fantasy about me? you totally did! was I good?

benanas foster (Eric H.), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

Lez wet dream iirc

˙❤‿❤˙˙❤‿❤˙ (ENBB), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

*takes final jump off thing on stage and falls down in slow motion as everyone else in thread gathers around to congratulate me*

tickle me imo (s1ocki), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

I bet M Night Shyamalan is pissed that this movie beat him to imaginary cunnilingus.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:25 (fifteen years ago)

i have it on good word that he IS

tickle me imo (s1ocki), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:26 (fifteen years ago)

He's actually stabbing himself in the face right now.

benanas foster (Eric H.), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

rip slocki

max, Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:30 (fifteen years ago)

admittedly that was Winona's funniest scene since she was tortured by Vincent Gallo in The House of the Spirits

xp

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

That's the spirit!

benanas foster (Eric H.), Sunday, 12 December 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)

I did not recognize the writers' names -- 3 credits seem to indicate this was kicking around for years before Aronofsky got hold of it, yeah?

A few weeks ago, I read an earlier draft that I found online. The mother is, instead, more of a den mother, who rents a kind of rooming house for dancers. The Winona character is murdered before the movie begins. More a mild mystery than this, though it still has some essential scenes (back-of-the-taxicab).

would like a calmer set (Eazy), Monday, 13 December 2010 03:29 (fifteen years ago)

This was good fun, but I like said in the detrius thread I can't believe this high camp is up for Oscars.

The audience -- a packed matinee -- loved it; they knew they were getting A-grade trash. Except for the old woman behind me who gasped when Kunis uttered her lick pussy line.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 18 December 2010 02:06 (fifteen years ago)

Most fun would-be Oscar nominee in years though (most nominees are failed camp).

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 18 December 2010 02:07 (fifteen years ago)

OTM

benanas foster (Eric H.), Saturday, 18 December 2010 06:10 (fifteen years ago)

"failed camp" = Notes on a Scandal

benanas foster (Eric H.), Saturday, 18 December 2010 06:11 (fifteen years ago)

They did not send me one of these

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38B5Jk2M5J8&feature=player_embedded

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 18 December 2010 08:48 (fifteen years ago)

I wasn't cool/old-media enough to get that either.

Simon H., Saturday, 18 December 2010 09:40 (fifteen years ago)

failed camp = http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/517EYGECHNL.jpg

max, Saturday, 18 December 2010 15:56 (fifteen years ago)

I didn't get a music box either. I just got a black feather and a white feather in an envelope.

benanas foster (Eric H.), Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

saw this, portman was good! wish i knew more about movies, but winona stabbing herself in the face was like o_0 lol

wiz kelefa sanneh claus (m bison), Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

totally

max, Saturday, 18 December 2010 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

the scene where she calls her mom to tell her she got the part was when i thought to myself 'wow she is knocking this out of the park' -

had the same reaction 2 that scene. liked this a good deal more than the wrestler

johnny crunch, Saturday, 18 December 2010 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

portman is really good in this, I'm sure she'll get a nomination, it's the first time I've seen her act convincingly since The Professional, frankly. The phone call was great and her final transformation into the Black Swan was pretty awesome too. the movie on the whole is obviously way over the top heavy handed metaphor and camp, but it was never not entertaining.

At our screening I sat behind an entire row of young asian girls, a few of whom brought their own Pillow Pets, who would NOT look at the screen during the masturbation scene. Also, some lady brought her 2 year old (was was thankfully silent, probably because he was being TRAUMATIZED). Weird showing.

akm, Sunday, 19 December 2010 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

I'm sure she'll get a nomination

She's currently the front-runner, in fact.

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Sunday, 19 December 2010 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

This thread is perfect

Carl (admrl), Sunday, 19 December 2010 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

Anyway, I enjoyed the movie for the most part. Like ENBB, though, I was a bit annoyed at the symbolism, and once reality and fantasy became indistinguishable in the final act, I had trouble investing myself in the emotional stakes, which felt evasive. But maybe I just wasn't entirely prepared for how fully the film ultimately distanced itself from reality and took on its own paranoid-dream logic. I kind of want to see it again, actually.

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Sunday, 19 December 2010 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

I came out of the movie thinking it wasn't that good - must be the script.

But then I read a review talking about Natalie being one note with a "who me?" character and it was the director's fault as much as Natalie's for letting that happen... I agreed. I guess you could say Natalie was a two note character when you take into account the final act. But the second note is just a bitchy version of the first note.

more affecting actually. (CaptainLorax), Sunday, 19 December 2010 22:44 (fifteen years ago)

So here's my ***SPOILER*** (though vague). Given what's real and what's possibly not real, this is kind of a hardcore movie about method acting. As in: are there any real external events that allow her to fully realize the role she wants to play, or does she (as Lee Strasberg and others have trained actors to do) just conjure the emotions necessary to play the role? Like, is this a movie in which no external events actually contribute to her transformation, assuming that she wasn't actually fingerbanged in the back of a taxicab?

― would like a calmer set (Eazy), Sunday, December 5, 2010 1:43 AM Bookmark

I like this, not so much because I think this needs more WAS IT ALL REAL? twist stuff, but more because it suggests that this isn't about an uptight girl having to loosen up, but about tapping into "loosening up" as just another thing that she's trying to get PERFECT. I took the movie as being basically about that, but maybe I'm just reading that into the stock story...

Doctor Casino, Sunday, 19 December 2010 23:54 (fifteen years ago)

too slow and boring to be funny-bad and wayyyy too safe to be exploitation

could have cut the middle hour of this movie out and it wouldn't have changed much

the girl (who was super excited to see it) came out pretty disappointed

iatee, Monday, 20 December 2010 00:57 (fifteen years ago)

funniest thing was the score, I think

iatee, Monday, 20 December 2010 00:58 (fifteen years ago)

kind of skeptical of arguments that accuse stuff of being "safe"

max, Monday, 20 December 2010 01:09 (fifteen years ago)

as the girl pointed out, if some actress who wasn't natalie portman were starring in this is there any way there wouldn't have been nudity? sex scenes hinted at an exploitation movie but...tame. same w/ the violence.

iatee, Monday, 20 December 2010 01:20 (fifteen years ago)

I mean this wasn't very far from being pg-13

iatee, Monday, 20 December 2010 01:22 (fifteen years ago)

Natalie Portman's not a woman, so it's all good.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 December 2010 01:24 (fifteen years ago)

i dunno, "we didnt see natalie portmans tits" isnt exactly uh the most cogent criticism imo

max, Monday, 20 December 2010 01:29 (fifteen years ago)

okay I'll stick with "this was really boring"

iatee, Monday, 20 December 2010 01:31 (fifteen years ago)

"Not seeing Natalie Portman's tits made the movie boring."

benanas foster (Eric H.), Monday, 20 December 2010 01:33 (fifteen years ago)

Not hearing Mila Kunis wondering about licking pussy would have made the movie boring.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 20 December 2010 01:45 (fifteen years ago)

as the girl pointed out, if some actress who wasn't natalie portman were starring in this is there any way there wouldn't have been nudity? sex scenes hinted at an exploitation movie but...tame. same w/ the violence.

― iatee, Sunday, December 19, 2010 8:20 PM (35 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

this is such a weird criticism to me

call all destroyer, Monday, 20 December 2010 01:58 (fifteen years ago)

saw this last night, was really great

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Monday, 20 December 2010 05:11 (fifteen years ago)

also if u want to see tits, go watch a porno imo

i genuinely thought when i first joined that he was the admin (ilxor), Monday, 20 December 2010 05:11 (fifteen years ago)

well if ilxor likes it, I guess you guys win

iatee, Monday, 20 December 2010 05:21 (fifteen years ago)

I don't know if this was supposed to be hilarious, but I laughed my ass off and had a great time.

I Am Kurious Assange (polyphonic), Monday, 20 December 2010 06:55 (fifteen years ago)

"slow and boring" doesnt scan for me, the movie flies by

Princess TamTam, Monday, 20 December 2010 11:33 (fifteen years ago)

otm, had my second viewing of this over the past week and I was struck by how fast it clipped along despite the (v. pronounced) repetitiveness.

Simon H., Monday, 20 December 2010 11:35 (fifteen years ago)

Agreed. I've been known to get really antsy in the movie theater and have a pretty low tolerance for slow movies. After we left, I mentioned that I thought it was really paced and that I didn't even check my watch once which, for me, is a pretty big deal.

ENBB, Monday, 20 December 2010 11:55 (fifteen years ago)

The film got longer every time I flashed back to all the other times each of Vincent Cassel's lines had been said by high-art impresarios in films throughout the ages.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Monday, 20 December 2010 12:42 (fifteen years ago)

(except maybe "You bit me")

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Monday, 20 December 2010 12:42 (fifteen years ago)

is that what film critic PTSD is like?

Gukbe, Monday, 20 December 2010 15:02 (fifteen years ago)

kinda dig these

http://www.laboca.co.uk/LB3site/images/FI_BLACKSWAN_posters4.jpg

the boobfinder general (Princess TamTam), Monday, 20 December 2010 22:28 (fifteen years ago)

Oooh, those are v. pretty.

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Monday, 20 December 2010 22:31 (fifteen years ago)

i would love all 4 of those even if i don't end up liking the film

irish xmas caek, get that marzipan inta ya (a hoy hoy), Monday, 20 December 2010 22:31 (fifteen years ago)

yeah those are totally awesome
please

would you rather see that movie or this one

http://www.movieposterdb.com/posters/10_11/2010/1341188/l_1341188_018ea83c.jpg

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Monday, 20 December 2010 22:34 (fifteen years ago)

oops
that was a poster for that stupid new reese witherspoon vehicle

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Monday, 20 December 2010 22:35 (fifteen years ago)

she should stop designing cars

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Monday, 20 December 2010 22:44 (fifteen years ago)

and get back to acting!

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Monday, 20 December 2010 22:44 (fifteen years ago)

ha!

ergonomically chromium plated fish slice (La Lechera), Monday, 20 December 2010 22:49 (fifteen years ago)

realized what the 'big bird' scene reminded me of

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NGQtltNSU78&t=36s

the boobfinder general (Princess TamTam), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 01:09 (fifteen years ago)

Those posters are amazing. I'd hang them in my apt.

ENBB, Tuesday, 21 December 2010 01:10 (fifteen years ago)

are those legit posters?

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 01:13 (fifteen years ago)

I'd srsly buy one if so.

ENBB, Tuesday, 21 December 2010 01:14 (fifteen years ago)

coz if they're some indie firm's spec project... :\

Astronaut Mike Dexter (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 01:15 (fifteen years ago)

those are official international posters... the third one's my fav

the boobfinder general (Princess TamTam), Tuesday, 21 December 2010 01:19 (fifteen years ago)

I like them all esp as a set but the 3rd and 4th best individually.

ENBB, Tuesday, 21 December 2010 01:22 (fifteen years ago)

"I'm pretty sure all gay arthouse fans will instantly love a film where a woman has murder fantasies, or masturbates and cries at the same time, or does creepy fetishistic lesbo stuff."

http://i55.tinypic.com/ae1l03.gif

Cunga, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 00:27 (fifteen years ago)

This thread is perfect
― Carl (admrl), Sunday, December 19, 2010 6:17 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

thanks bruv

cozen, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 00:32 (fifteen years ago)

NY Times article about shooting in HD included this:

...when it came time to get down and dirty in the New York subways (and without the requisite permits), Mr. Libatique switched to a couple of digital single-lens reflex Canon cameras: in other words still cameras, with video functionality, which are not much different from the kind you might use to load your iPhone up with shots of the new puppy.

Would not want to stumble across that scene on the subway.

would like a calmer set (Eazy), Wednesday, 22 December 2010 02:32 (fifteen years ago)

Those posters are amazing. I'd hang them in my apt.

― ENBB, Monday, December 20, 2010 8:10 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah they're awesome!

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 02:38 (fifteen years ago)

Was very disappointed the masturbation scene didn't result in an actual climax. It seems American movies still can't deal with masturbation unless they put in a little joke at the end.

Josefa, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 03:34 (fifteen years ago)

masturbation ending in climax so predictable

Є|Э (Edward III), Wednesday, 22 December 2010 03:36 (fifteen years ago)

do u watch american porn? lotta climaxes there if u r hard up 4 one.

wiz kelefa sanneh claus (m bison), Wednesday, 22 December 2010 03:36 (fifteen years ago)

i dont know what planet u come from where ur mom being in the room while u "play wit urself" is a "little joke"

max, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 03:37 (fifteen years ago)

^Well the audience laughed.

Also, it's another movie where going to a dance club seems like entering the pits of hell. Who would actually want to go to these horrible clubs?

Josefa, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 03:40 (fifteen years ago)

was funny that dude was like "ballet uhhh no"

486.52 (CaptainLorax), Wednesday, 22 December 2010 03:46 (fifteen years ago)

Was very disappointed the masturbation scene didn't result in an actual climax. It seems American movies still can't deal with masturbation unless they put in a little joke at the end.

― Josefa, Tuesday, December 21, 2010 10:34 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

lol

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 03:48 (fifteen years ago)

u really got us amurrcans figured out!

call all destroyer, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 03:48 (fifteen years ago)

did you just? disgusting dude

Є|Э (Edward III), Wednesday, 22 December 2010 03:49 (fifteen years ago)

Saw it this afternoon - meh. I'm with the few "slow and boring" folks upthread - 2nd act takes forever, whole thing was much too long. Some of the effects were quite nice though.

EZ Snappin, Thursday, 23 December 2010 02:22 (fifteen years ago)

it's another movie where going to a dance club seems like entering the pits of hell.

well?

and how is it that Fox doesn't shell out for subway permits? musta seemed like shooting Pi to D.A.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 23 December 2010 04:41 (fifteen years ago)

Looking forward to watching this, I love "psycho-sexual dramas". Speaking of which, has anyone updated Salo to American-occupied Iraq? Now that's a movie someone really needs to make.

Spectrum, Thursday, 23 December 2010 04:58 (fifteen years ago)

Lots of women running around screaming in this.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 23 December 2010 05:09 (fifteen years ago)

Dug this. Let myself forget initially that it was Aronofsky and that there would thus be freaky shit afoot. Can't decide if mom-in-the-room-during-masturbation or Winona freaking out and stabbing herself in the face was more disturbing. Totally camp, and aware of it, but hit its marks well, and stuck with me for the rest of the night.

The SBurbs (Alex in Montreal), Friday, 24 December 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)

kinda drunk but OMG LOVED THIS and yeah lolled my head off basically

key section early on for me was the swift triptych of (spoilers):

- crying in the bathroom / turns / WHORE ON THE MIRROR lol (need gif please)

- scene with mother and her disgusting squelch-squelch massive gross cake slicing sounds (MMM IT'S OUR FAVOURITE VANILLA, WITH STRAWBERRY FILLING) / hysterical throwing in garbage / eating off mother's finger (with more added squelch slurp sound) (sfx were brilliant throughout)

- cassel's "metamorphosis into err eevel twen" in schlock ham accent (was he always this bad or..?)

even after 3/4 of it i'dve been happy with all that nonsense but the finale just sent it ott into super classic territory

r|t|c, Saturday, 25 December 2010 04:32 (fifteen years ago)

black swan more like black yawn amirite

gr8080, Saturday, 25 December 2010 04:35 (fifteen years ago)

no this was the most hysterically entertaining movie of the year

akm, Saturday, 25 December 2010 20:40 (fifteen years ago)

agreed, i'm just fronting.

btw this is the best ILE thread on a movie in a long time. nice work, everyone!

gr8080, Saturday, 25 December 2010 21:33 (fifteen years ago)

the finale just sent it ott into super classic territory

this is the max definition of "classic," right?

cinema is basically over

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Saturday, 25 December 2010 23:31 (fifteen years ago)

I don't have a problem enjoying a movie on a camp level but I really didn't see more than a laugh or two in this. if this could make people 'lol their head off' I can't imagine how you guys take ott campy movies.

iatee, Sunday, 26 December 2010 00:47 (fifteen years ago)

really struggling w/ s1ocki's "this film is self-aware" take

gr8080, Sunday, 26 December 2010 02:11 (fifteen years ago)

also everyone i know IRL thinks this film is a v v serious achievement in cinematic wonderment

gr8080, Sunday, 26 December 2010 02:12 (fifteen years ago)

Mila Kunis strikes me as one of the most natural actresses of her generation. There wasn't a single thing she did in this that wasn't fantastic to me; I think she deserves more awards than Natalie Portman.

Winona Ryder stabbing herself in the face totally caught me off guard and was amazingly creepy.

Natalie Portman is winning an Oscar for this.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Sunday, 26 December 2010 03:27 (fifteen years ago)

so much fun, r|t|c o|t|m (lol sorry, i'm drunk toooooooo)

ok (Tape Store), Sunday, 26 December 2010 05:37 (fifteen years ago)

i wish i were 16 again so this movie could shake me up. now i need to watch like IN VANDA'S ROOM or something to make sure I have a heart.

ok (Tape Store), Sunday, 26 December 2010 05:38 (fifteen years ago)

Kunis was particularly good. everything the ballet instructor said about her character is equally true of the actress. just totally effortless.

not currently in Montreal. (Alex in Montreal), Sunday, 26 December 2010 05:46 (fifteen years ago)

^^^also otm, i loved all the performances in this

ok (Tape Store), Sunday, 26 December 2010 05:51 (fifteen years ago)

http://grab.by/84rk

btw yall god bless award season

ice cr?m, Sunday, 26 December 2010 06:24 (fifteen years ago)

This sucked.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 26 December 2010 13:51 (fifteen years ago)

you said it was good fun earlier!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMf0MTweXYc (Princess TamTam), Sunday, 26 December 2010 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

really struggling w/ s1ocki's "this film is self-aware" take

― gr8080, Saturday, December 25, 2010 9:11 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

also everyone i know IRL thinks this film is a v v serious achievement in cinematic wonderment

― gr8080, Saturday, December 25, 2010 9:12 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

Yeah, if this was being touted as "arthouse ballet piranha 3D: THEY PLI´E @ U FACE" I would have probably gotten into it way more than the "serious Oscar-worthy psychological thriller nom nom nom smothered in kunis" everyone seems to think it is.

kenny noggins (Whiney G. Weingarten), Sunday, 26 December 2010 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

THEY PLI´E @ U FACE

^ grudging props 4 this

r|t|c, Sunday, 26 December 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

This movie is fun. Pay no attention to the Oscar buzz.

benanas foster (Eric H.), Sunday, 26 December 2010 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

This was a lot of fun to watch but I think calling it "campy" or "hilarious" is indicative of intentionally distancing yourself from the movie.

There were parts that were funny but the movie wasn't hilarious. I guess if you don't care that Portman's character is going crazy, there's pretty much no story here for you.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Sunday, 26 December 2010 18:47 (fifteen years ago)

I'm probably seeing this later in the week. I'm guessin' it'll be a lot like The Red Shoes, but with the centerpiece being a good chunk of Dracula: Pages From A Virgin's Diary.

HERE'S HOPIN'!

"They did it with computers!" (R Baez), Sunday, 26 December 2010 18:54 (fifteen years ago)

Surprised not to be reading parallels between this and The Social Network as 2010 coming-of-age stories.

would like a calmer set (Eazy), Sunday, 26 December 2010 19:02 (fifteen years ago)

they are both stylish nerd fanfiction if that's what you mean.

"I guess if you don't care that Portman's character is going crazy"
the movie doesn't waste any time getting you to empathize with her, other than the automatic assumption that you're supposed to empathize with her because she's natalie portman. character-wise she's about as relatable as eisenzuckerberg.

Philip Nunez, Sunday, 26 December 2010 19:13 (fifteen years ago)

the movie does nothing to make you care about her character, but i think that works to its advantage when she dies - you're not sad, and it's actually sorta joyous that she gets to go out on top

most of what im hearing about this movie outside of ilx emphasizes how scary and creepy it is, this is the only place where people are going omg so funny - at the same time, everyone in the theater i was in was laughing a lot, and so was i, and it's a fun movie, so idk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMf0MTweXYc (Princess TamTam), Sunday, 26 December 2010 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

they are both stylish nerd fanfiction if that's what you mean.

Nah, I meant that they're both set in the present and both have hyperambitious protagonists of the same age who are outside the norms of what is considered immature and mature.

would like a calmer set (Eazy), Sunday, 26 December 2010 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

I thought it had a lot of parallels with the new TRON movie in that both movies were about the pursuit of ~perfection~

gr8080, Sunday, 26 December 2010 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

I think the only time I chuckled was at that big black bird backstage.

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Sunday, 26 December 2010 23:31 (fifteen years ago)

i loled when she ran in her mom's room and all the drawings and paintings had cone alive and were screaming.

gr8080, Sunday, 26 December 2010 23:38 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah I laughed then too. I loved that actually.

ENBB, Sunday, 26 December 2010 23:39 (fifteen years ago)

the more i think about this movie, the more unsure I am about what I think of it. one minute I'd be loling at all the melodrama and then something like the finale of the 2nd act where she sprouts wings would happen and I'd actually get emotionally moved by it and then one minute later I'm loling at it again.

gr8080, Sunday, 26 December 2010 23:48 (fifteen years ago)

I guess that goes along with what I was saying about not being entirely prepared for the over-the-top campiness. I was totally into the movie as a "taut psychological thriller" or whatever, so that when scenes like that started to crop up, they felt like misfires. In that scene and also the one where Winona stabs herself in the face, I was half-cringing at how blatant the hallucinations had become. But maybe I was just misreading it from the beginning.

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Sunday, 26 December 2010 23:56 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe im just saying this cause i watched All That Jazz recently, but this movie should have shown more dancing imo. Or made the dancing it did show more interesting.

Ending v similar to All That Jazz come to think of it.

gr8080, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:11 (fifteen years ago)

I enjoyed it. Being over-the-top and blatant is part of this style of movie. The first few scenes definitely set the tone for a 70s-80s European giallo/sexual thriller, so I appreciated the ridiculous melodrama of it all... if anything I probably would've been disappointed if it wasn't ridiculous to some degree.

Spectrum, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:17 (fifteen years ago)

You know what movie did "serious ish wrapped in self-aware lols" a lot better? Machete. Where's their Oscar?

nog it out with (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 27 December 2010 00:17 (fifteen years ago)

"perfection is not just about control, it's also about letting go." -vincent cassel in the black swan

"the thing about perfection is that it's unknowable." -jeff bridges in tron legacy

what r ur thoughts on perfection?

gr8080, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:19 (fifteen years ago)

Not everyone's seen the style of movie Aronofsky is calling out here, so it's probably easy to see things that are just genre cues as being important or out of place if you're expecting something else. I thought this was a movie purely in the spirit of indulgent, trashy fun; even the high-mindedness was cheap and enjoyable.

Spectrum, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:24 (fifteen years ago)

So I was talking to the friends I saw this with and was a little surprised that they didn't see anything campy/funny about it at all.

ENBB, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:26 (fifteen years ago)

wasn't Natalie Portman supposed to star in a re-make of Susperia?

Would love to see black swan as done by Argento or Bava.

gr8080, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:28 (fifteen years ago)

again - if this movie was in the spirit of indulgent, trashy fun then its problem was that it sucked and bringing enough indulgent, trashy fun

iatee, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:30 (fifteen years ago)

sucked at*

iatee, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:30 (fifteen years ago)

dan's 'but I think calling it "campy" or "hilarious" is indicative of intentionally distancing yourself from the movie.' the most otm half a sentence in this thread

iatee, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:32 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah I have a really hard time believing Aronofsky has ever set out to make anything fun.

xpost

gr8080, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:33 (fifteen years ago)

i don't think i get it? we're supposed to approach it seriously and then conclude that it's a bad movie?

call all destroyer, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:35 (fifteen years ago)

its ok to be invested in a campy/hilarious movie!! its possible to have a movie that hits both serious and funny emotional cues!!

max, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:35 (fifteen years ago)

i felt really invested in it but it is hilarious--maybe "campy" is too loaded? don't get "intentional distancing," no ones saying it's the room or something

call all destroyer, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:36 (fifteen years ago)

i mean, I didn't even think it was supposed to be trashy/campy/funny until ILX said so. I thought it was a crappy, ham-handed, corny, goofy-as-fuck "psychological thriller." But I could see myself totally enjoying it if had encountered it using the s1ockimax method.

Also, I just saw Replusion for the first time which is like better than this times a billion

nog it out with (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 27 December 2010 00:36 (fifteen years ago)

I came in expecting that fwiw and still thought it was a crappy psychological thriller (w/ two or three funny lines)

iatee, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:38 (fifteen years ago)

Well, it depends on what you think is fun. Some people like lurid mystery thrillers, so when Aronofsky hits those notes, if that's not your thing, you probably won't get much enjoyment from it. The scene with the mother and the cake, and their bizarre relationship in general - that's part of what made this movie work for me.

Spectrum, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:41 (fifteen years ago)

the cake scene was maybe the worst part of this movie

gr8080, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:44 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i found many of the scenes ~chilling~ and i was invested in the thriller aspect or w/e, there were just a few good chuckles along the way - i used to hate aronofsky and was prepared to grumble my way through this movie and expected a lot of self seriousness, it's prob a good thing i read this thread before seeing it idk

btw has anyone mentioned how gorgeous the camera work is, especially in the dance sequences, the part where we finally meet her as the black swan (head pops into frame while she dances backwards) at the end gave me chills

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMf0MTweXYc (Princess TamTam), Monday, 27 December 2010 00:44 (fifteen years ago)

the cake scene, all the shots of natalie looking bewildered and sweaty and the twirling camera, this stuff reminded me of requiem and when i saw the trailer i was like 'i'm so ready to hate this' - you could tell DA was just gonna go crazy with the fucked up feet and the crazy stressed out ballerina lifestyle like all he could think was UNGHHH BALLET CAN BE SO DARK AND GRITTY MAN, but it all just somehow worked

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMf0MTweXYc (Princess TamTam), Monday, 27 December 2010 00:47 (fifteen years ago)

xp yeah it's beautifully shot--aronofsky is a fantastic technical filmmaker even when i hate his movies

call all destroyer, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:47 (fifteen years ago)

I connected with the creepy and/or bizarre notes -- I like suspense films with lingering dread or simmering tension or things that "don't feel right" -- just not the more overt cheeseball-horror notes.

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Monday, 27 December 2010 00:49 (fifteen years ago)

yeah the camera work during the parts where she's performing as the black swan was incredible. really enjoyed the camera work throughout.

gr8080, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:49 (fifteen years ago)

I have a VHS copy of Pi that Tower Video ended up charging me $100 for that I'm still bitter about and feel like aronofsky owes me some good movies in order to make up for it. The more I think about this movie the more I like it and want to see it again esp after reading this thread and other people's criticisms/praises.

Everyone otm about the camera work esp in that final dance scene.

ENBB, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:51 (fifteen years ago)

lol i had a vhs copy of pi

call all destroyer, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:51 (fifteen years ago)

Those moments are supposed to be cheesy and overwrought, though ... the style of the movie and the subplot of Swan Lake link together a mutual style of over-the-top emotionality.

Spectrum, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:52 (fifteen years ago)

x-post But I bet you didn't have to pay a hundred bucks for it. hmpf.

ENBB, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:53 (fifteen years ago)

no--i def did not pay 100 bucks.

aronofsky owes me for requiem is what he owes me for

call all destroyer, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:55 (fifteen years ago)

well yeah, that too

ENBB, Monday, 27 December 2010 00:55 (fifteen years ago)

Those moments are supposed to be cheesy and overwrought, though ...

still not buying this

gr8080, Monday, 27 December 2010 01:12 (fifteen years ago)

TBF I loved Requiem for a Dream

Indolence Mission (DJP), Monday, 27 December 2010 01:26 (fifteen years ago)

Nothing struck me as cheesy in this. Overwrought and over-the-top yes, but not cheesy. That implies amateurish to me and I didn't think there was a single false note in the movie. There was melodrama but it wasn't out of place or forced given the story that was being told (a ballerina who apparently had a history of mental issues given her mother's hyper-protectiveness and reaction to her scratching, plus her bulimia and the compulsive stealing, gets her big break and goes totally self-harming crazy attempting to live up to the expectations).

Indolence Mission (DJP), Monday, 27 December 2010 01:49 (fifteen years ago)

Well, yeah, cuz this movie was conceived at a bullshit level in which Victorian conceptions of womanhood still apply. That it enforced them with real assurance suggests how well Arnofsky plied his cliches, which is why I endorsed it a week ago. But it's still a crap movie.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 December 2010 02:16 (fifteen years ago)

did you change your mind or did you think it was crap a week ago too

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMf0MTweXYc (Princess TamTam), Monday, 27 December 2010 02:18 (fifteen years ago)

Well, I thought it was entertaining trash.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 December 2010 02:21 (fifteen years ago)

well it cant be all that bad if you had a good time! http://www.4thletter.net/wp-content/plugins/smilies-themer/SAEmoticons/emot-colbert.png

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMf0MTweXYc (Princess TamTam), Monday, 27 December 2010 02:25 (fifteen years ago)

You can hate yourself in the morning, as Dolly Parton said.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 December 2010 02:34 (fifteen years ago)

i'd have a hard time refuting what alfred says about the movie; it's melodramatic and over the top and full of cliches. the long club scene in the middle was a mistake and throws the movie out of balance.

but i still loved it and can't imagine it won't top my best-of-2010 list when i finally get around to making one. lots of great old hollywood stuff that everyone loves was borderline ridiculous (lots of hitchcock, for one) but it stayed on the right side of the border. so did this one.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 27 December 2010 02:44 (fifteen years ago)

You know what keeps me from accepting this as an attempt at an Old Hollywood soaper? Natalie Portman's boringness. Like I said upthread, I really can't stand drippy female performances.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 December 2010 02:52 (fifteen years ago)

"Well, I thought it was entertaining trash."

that's my favorite kind of trash!

but this movie was way more restrained than what i was expecting (natalie portswan flying into the audience and tearing out eyes and her red eyes shooting omega beams and such).

Philip Nunez, Monday, 27 December 2010 02:53 (fifteen years ago)

you expected Portman to shoot omega beams and such?

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 27 December 2010 02:56 (fifteen years ago)

xpost

lol out-of-nowhere Kirby reference

"They did it with computers!" (R Baez), Monday, 27 December 2010 02:58 (fifteen years ago)

when people's eyes turn red i expect lasers to eventually blast out of them c.f. chekov's gun.

Philip Nunez, Monday, 27 December 2010 03:00 (fifteen years ago)

You know what keeps me from accepting this as an attempt at an Old Hollywood soaper? Natalie Portman's boringness. Like I said upthread, I really can't stand drippy female performances.

― Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, December 26, 2010 9:52 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark

i'm sympathetic to this POV, but it was the first thing I've liked her in since The Professional

Princess TamTam, Monday, 27 December 2010 03:04 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i actually thought portman was fantastic, and i'm normally pretty ho-hum about her. winona was great, too -- probably the first time she's been really great since, what, 1990?

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 27 December 2010 03:27 (fifteen years ago)

Is there a way to make a movie about late-adolence body-image/self-harming issues and not have middle-aged dudes think of it as melodramatic?

would like a calmer set (Eazy), Monday, 27 December 2010 04:51 (fifteen years ago)

er, late-adolescent

would like a calmer set (Eazy), Monday, 27 December 2010 04:54 (fifteen years ago)

i'm not even close to middle age, but no, prob not.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 27 December 2010 05:01 (fifteen years ago)

xpost:
are you arguing that this film is not melodramatic?

gr8080, Monday, 27 December 2010 05:02 (fifteen years ago)

winona was great, too -- probably the first time she's been really great since, what, 1990?

ha I thought this too

Indolence Mission (DJP), Monday, 27 December 2010 05:33 (fifteen years ago)

I am so-so on Aronofsky, but after the tedium of The Wrestler, I would've been happy just to see him return to form even if Black Swan didn't hit so many of my sweet spots.

benanas foster (Eric H.), Monday, 27 December 2010 06:29 (fifteen years ago)

But since it did, I'm happy to call it one of my favorites this year in the bargain.

benanas foster (Eric H.), Monday, 27 December 2010 06:30 (fifteen years ago)

I have a VHS copy of Pi that Tower Video ended up charging me $100 for that I'm still bitter about and feel like aronofsky owes me some good movies in order to make up for it.

― ENBB, Sunday, December 26, 2010 7:51 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

pay attention people this ^^ is ott camp trash melodrama

ice cr?m, Monday, 27 December 2010 07:54 (fifteen years ago)

gah i want to see this but mostly because ive had a crush on mila since T70sS season 1.

calling planet dearth (sunny successor), Monday, 27 December 2010 09:08 (fifteen years ago)

K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S / K U N I S /

― Becky Facelift, Wednesday, August 18, 2010 9:25 AM (4 months ago) Bookmark

yes this ^^

and

Well, I thought it was entertaining trash.

― Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, December 26, 2010 8:21 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

this is encouraging (no sarcasm)

calling planet dearth (sunny successor), Monday, 27 December 2010 09:12 (fifteen years ago)

eh

Є|Э (Edward III), Tuesday, 28 December 2010 04:49 (fifteen years ago)

that was what I thought, "eh"

Є|Э (Edward III), Tuesday, 28 December 2010 04:50 (fifteen years ago)

after I finished watching the major motion picture black swan by darren aronofsky

Є|Э (Edward III), Tuesday, 28 December 2010 04:50 (fifteen years ago)

this had me going but i don't think i liked it

goole, Tuesday, 28 December 2010 14:47 (fifteen years ago)

bit cruel eh, just seemed kind of stupid

goole, Tuesday, 28 December 2010 14:48 (fifteen years ago)

best comedies of 2010

just sayin, Tuesday, 28 December 2010 17:51 (fifteen years ago)

will youtube the bits with mila kunis and natalie portman kissing.

― Efraqueen Juárez (jim in glasgow), Wednesday, September 1, 2010 11:36 PM (3 months ago)

the prophecy is realised.

À la recherche du temps Pardew (jim in glasgow), Tuesday, 28 December 2010 17:57 (fifteen years ago)

I'm not an Aronofsky fan but I really liked this. Very, very silly but an effective, visceral experience in the theater. Looked and sounded great!

nutwasher suite (latebloomer), Tuesday, 28 December 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

I liked how whenever her mom called, ehr phone had this giant pink screen that said

MOM

Stop Non-Erotic Cabaret (Abbbottt), Tuesday, 28 December 2010 18:29 (fifteen years ago)

reminded me a lot of the piano teacher in places

cozen, Tuesday, 28 December 2010 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

yes!

ENBB, Tuesday, 28 December 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

i just watched vampire's kiss and now would like to have seen portman run amok in the streets shouting I'M A SWAN I'MASWANIMASWAN
i know a lot of haters don't think portman has it in her to go to cagian heights/depths but i have faith.

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 28 December 2010 21:38 (fifteen years ago)

Some have called Black Swan "straight camp," and the near-oxymoronic concept refers less to sexual orientation than to an aesthetic contradiction: an auteur whose self-serious sensibility lends itself to unwitting camp applying himself to a piece of conscious camp.

http://www.slate.com/id/2279459/pagenum/all

ice cr?m, Friday, 31 December 2010 01:22 (fifteen years ago)

Susan Sontag rip

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 31 December 2010 01:23 (fifteen years ago)

Dug the stimuli no end... wasn't as ground-breaking as RWD though, and seemed bizarre early in the movie when the camera would follow up right behind her incessantly as she walked to places. It's like Aronoflkjyy just graduated from film-school and felt the desire not to be just a regular scan & dolly schmoe.

It was definitely appropriate later in the movie tho - well done too - , I just felt the film could've benefited from a little more normalcy in the initial 40minute bit.

(kelpolaris) (kelpolaris) (kelpolaris) (kelpolaris) (kelpolaris), Friday, 31 December 2010 01:26 (fifteen years ago)

Despite some diva catfights and lesbian sex, there's not a queer bone in its body.

gr8080, Friday, 31 December 2010 01:28 (fifteen years ago)

There is probably really no such thing as "straight camp," and it there is, it's probably something more along the lines of Serendipity or something.

it also takes hip-hip with it (Eric H.), Friday, 31 December 2010 01:33 (fifteen years ago)

kubrick is straight up straight camp and black swan is very much in that tradition. the shining x eyes wide shut

Philip Nunez, Friday, 31 December 2010 02:05 (fifteen years ago)

when you multiply something by eyes wide shut you get eyes wide shut

ice cr?m, Friday, 31 December 2010 02:08 (fifteen years ago)

lol

tehresa, Friday, 31 December 2010 02:09 (fifteen years ago)

haha

gr8080, Friday, 31 December 2010 02:30 (fifteen years ago)

Dug the stimuli no end... wasn't as ground-breaking as RWD though, and seemed bizarre early in the movie when the camera would follow up right behind her incessantly as she walked to places. It's like Aronoflkjyy just graduated from film-school and felt the desire not to be just a regular scan & dolly schmoe.

It was definitely appropriate later in the movie tho - well done too - , I just felt the film could've benefited from a little more normalcy in the initial 40minute bit.

I have a theory that the point behind that was that, since Portman's character was never all there to begin with, the intermittent shaky cam moments at the beginning were to establish how precarious her mental state was early on so that when she went full on bananas there were signposts for it for you to remember erratic moments earlier in the film (like the bulimia scene and her stealing shit from Winona Ryder).

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 31 December 2010 03:14 (fifteen years ago)

ok i watched the 1st 20mins and i think im just gonna go see it in the theater, yall won, the world finally won against me, congrats world

ice cr?m, Friday, 31 December 2010 04:11 (fifteen years ago)

1 world
0 ice cr?m

johnny crunch, Friday, 31 December 2010 04:13 (fifteen years ago)

my mom liked this

contenderizer, Friday, 31 December 2010 04:17 (fifteen years ago)

Lol ur mom likes lesballerinas

infinity rebounding stats (m bison), Friday, 31 December 2010 04:17 (fifteen years ago)

I'm just playing this is a qual film

infinity rebounding stats (m bison), Friday, 31 December 2010 04:18 (fifteen years ago)

hey contenderizer can i get yr moms #

ice cr?m, Friday, 31 December 2010 04:19 (fifteen years ago)

why because she looks intersting

(kelpolaris) (kelpolaris) (kelpolaris) (kelpolaris) (kelpolaris), Friday, 31 December 2010 04:41 (fifteen years ago)

^ joke i bailed on, glad someone came through

contenderizer, Friday, 31 December 2010 04:57 (fifteen years ago)

kubrick is straight up straight camp and black swan is very much in that tradition

eff u

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 31 December 2010 08:41 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.slate.com/id/2279459/

iatee, Saturday, 1 January 2011 02:47 (fifteen years ago)

yeah icey linked that yesterday- kind of good, mostly annoying

gr8080, Saturday, 1 January 2011 03:08 (fifteen years ago)

oops I must have fucked up my cntl f

iatee, Saturday, 1 January 2011 03:12 (fifteen years ago)

his was a diff url to the same thing iirc. i liked that movieline review the slate piece linked to a lot better.

gr8080, Saturday, 1 January 2011 03:13 (fifteen years ago)

basically i agree w/ this review except i enjoyed it: http://www.movieline.com/2010/12/review-black-swan-takes-its-own-hifalutin-hokum-way-too-seriously.php

gr8080, Saturday, 1 January 2011 03:14 (fifteen years ago)

black swan more like black YAWN amirite

dayo, Saturday, 1 January 2011 03:17 (fifteen years ago)

black swan more like black yawn amirite

― gr8080, Friday, December 24, 2010 6:35 PM (1 week ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

gr8080, Saturday, 1 January 2011 03:19 (fifteen years ago)

;_;

dayo, Saturday, 1 January 2011 03:20 (fifteen years ago)

dayo = black swan, gr8080 = white swan

iatee, Saturday, 1 January 2011 03:21 (fifteen years ago)

no joke i actually ctrl+f'd "yawn" and "amirite" before posting that

gr8080, Saturday, 1 January 2011 03:22 (fifteen years ago)

already falling behind on my 2011 year of good posts resolution

dayo, Saturday, 1 January 2011 03:23 (fifteen years ago)

black swan more like black yawn amirite

laughed aloud

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 1 January 2011 06:31 (fifteen years ago)

Lol ur mom likes lesballerinas

my mom refuses to see or spend $$ on any movie w/ a gay/lesbian sex scene, including this one ;_;

slouching, unshaven, thick-necked, unstylish, pig-eyed (ilxor), Sunday, 2 January 2011 03:24 (fifteen years ago)

can't help but feel there's a zing struggling to get out of there

Costco Chapel (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 January 2011 03:26 (fifteen years ago)

xpost

Who told her?

heh (kelpolaris), Sunday, 2 January 2011 03:42 (fifteen years ago)

Enjoyed this, but was frustrated by how Aronofsky would get great moments from the actors and then be all NO LOOK AT MY CGI INSTEAD. What kind of nut sees the portman/kunis sex scene and says "now what this needs is moving tattoos."

da croupier, Sunday, 2 January 2011 04:28 (fifteen years ago)

questions that shd not be asked in the internet age

Costco Chapel (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 January 2011 04:29 (fifteen years ago)

blunt and unnuanced opinion is this movie is very cool and i don't rly relate to much in these reviews, there's no good reason not to enjoy besides maybe ur queazy and it makes you uncomfortable. stuff like the movieline review just feels like cool kid movie critic poise & i disagree w almost everything. thought all more familiar or cliche material was dealt with really nicely & perfectly, natalie portman killed it, kind of seems like the review's criticizing it for having more interpersonal depth but really it's almost exclusively interior

Aronofsky and cinematographer Matthew Libatique give us something to look at, or at least giggle over, every minute, whether it’s Portman’s Nina-the-ballerina sprouting tiny, spiky feathers from her shoulder blades or Winona Ryder, as a spurned elder-ballerina, going all crazy-eights.

some friends of the friends i went with were giggling throughout the movie & it was kind of disgusting savagery

flopson, Sunday, 2 January 2011 06:05 (fifteen years ago)

lesballerinas engaging in Kunilingus

nutwasher suite (latebloomer), Sunday, 2 January 2011 06:36 (fifteen years ago)

i giggled throughout this movie.

gr8080, Sunday, 2 January 2011 08:53 (fifteen years ago)

some friends of the friends i went with were giggling throughout the movie & it was kind of disgusting savagery

maybe your friends have seen psychological horror movies before. or center stage.

da croupier, Sunday, 2 January 2011 13:12 (fifteen years ago)

my revulsion was def majorly situational, saw it at a kinda art housey cinema & you could just feel all the eyes rolling

most lol moment was after kunis cassel sex hallucination when the guy in the birdman suit just walks by & says "hey"

flopson, Sunday, 2 January 2011 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

i saw it on a chinese streaming service with english subtitles that translated 'fuck you' as 'woe to you' and that was so perfect
i wished she had actually said, 'woe to you'

Philip Nunez, Sunday, 2 January 2011 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

A.O.S. O.T.M.

would like a calmer set (Eazy), Monday, 3 January 2011 03:53 (fifteen years ago)

xpost

Who told her?

probably heard about it on E! News Live or something-- who knows

she refuses to see Mulholland Dr. for the same reason ;_;

slouching, unshaven, thick-necked, unstylish, pig-eyed (ilxor), Monday, 3 January 2011 14:56 (fifteen years ago)

trashy greatness flowchart:

http://www.slate.com/id/2279738/entry/2279739/

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 18:46 (fifteen years ago)

Can't wait to read how Stephanie defends Somewhere.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 18:48 (fifteen years ago)

why is ao scott all like DON'T U SEE IT IS NOT ABOUT BALLET

Є|Э (Edward III), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 19:02 (fifteen years ago)

flowchart otm

gr8080, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

I pretty much agree with that review (aside from the laughing my ass off at the movie part; there were things I laughed at because there were funny scenes/lines but I didn't find the movie to be a nonstop laugh riot and the creepy scenes ppl say they laughed at were actually creepy to me), yet I still strongly object to his definition/reclamation of "trash"

I guess I am just protective of my pejoratives, lol

Indolence Mission (DJP), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

It doesn't seem like a very discriminating definition: "The best trash gleefully appropriates any and all tropes—camp tropes, horror tropes, Expressionism, first-person shooters, long Chris Rock routines—and combines it with top-drawer talent and inspiration as a way of bashing high and low together to generate sparks."

does pixar's Up count? it's only missing long Chris Rock routines.

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

in fairness that is a direct reference to the Kanye album he's using as a reference point

Indolence Mission (DJP), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

kanye seems more like knowing, winking camp though?

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

The best trash gleefully appropriates any and all tropes—camp tropes, horror tropes, Expressionism, first-person shooters, long Chris Rock routines—and combines it with top-drawer talent and inspiration as a way of bashing high and low together to generate sparks.

not really sure what makes the film "trash" by this guy's definition.

da croupier, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 19:28 (fifteen years ago)

like, if a film is full of tropes but doesn't have "top-drawer talent" and doesn't bash highbrow into its lowbrow, is it not great trash?

da croupier, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 19:29 (fifteen years ago)

and why does "the best trash" have to grab bits and pieces of everything?

da croupier, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 19:31 (fifteen years ago)

sounds like he's really craving an inspired "mess" more than "trash"

da croupier, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 19:33 (fifteen years ago)

I would agree with that, actually.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

black swan needed a long chris rock routine

gr8080, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 20:27 (fifteen years ago)

Showgirls is way better

homosexual II, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 21:07 (fifteen years ago)

http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c98/kmblog/201012/20101229c.jpg

"Black swans drive like this."

would like a calmer set (Eazy), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 21:08 (fifteen years ago)

"if you were only dancing the part of the white swan" is a huge meme in our house

Stop Non-Erotic Cabaret (Abbbottt), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 21:10 (fifteen years ago)

her big line about how she's the swan queen and her mom was in the corps was allllllllmost up to "I am the best goddamn dancer in the American Ballet Academy. Who the hell are you? Nobody." in Center Stage.

da croupier, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

"In my neighborhood, there are four black swans. Hundreds of houses, four black swans."

would like a calmer set (Eazy), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

black swans vs pink flamingos

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 4 January 2011 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

vs the birdcage

VegemiteGrrrl, Tuesday, 4 January 2011 22:10 (fifteen years ago)

so i went and saw and enjoyed it v much - agree w/most everyone that its a playful film designed to shock and delight - vibing off the melodrama of ballet, shooting you into stagy horror and exploitation scenarios etc

theres one set of obvious tropes that havent been commented on as much as the rest or maybe have been taken more seriously rather than recognized as the ott elements of pastiche they are- that would be all the artistic journey flimflam - control and madness, fear and confidence, dedication and hurt toes blahdy blah - that stuff is equally as silly as any of the rest of it and is deployed strictly for effect

in a lot of ways resembled another crazy quilted movie from this year that people couldnt figure out how seriously to take, inception - also lol at throwing her stuffed animals down the trash shoot

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 5 January 2011 01:00 (fifteen years ago)

black swan performance scene was amazing, w/all those lil pre feather goosebumps youre not sure youre seeing at first rippling up and down her shoulders and arms

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 5 January 2011 01:04 (fifteen years ago)

I figured out exactly how seriously to take Inception

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 5 January 2011 01:20 (fifteen years ago)

and us your posts

nutwasher suite (latebloomer), Wednesday, 5 January 2011 03:43 (fifteen years ago)

i keed

nutwasher suite (latebloomer), Wednesday, 5 January 2011 03:43 (fifteen years ago)

lol luv u guys *hugs* * hallucinates bleeding cuticles*

ice cr?m, Wednesday, 5 January 2011 04:16 (fifteen years ago)

The guy on the subway/ass to ass guy is actually playing the same character in this apparently - "Uncle Hank"

Number None, Wednesday, 5 January 2011 12:32 (fifteen years ago)

he's the r2-d/c3p0 of the aronofskoverse

Young Guns aside, the western is not my favorite genre. (latebloomer), Thursday, 6 January 2011 05:04 (fifteen years ago)

You guys seen this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_Blue

not sure if I mentioned it upthread, but if I had it was pre-movie watching. So contrary to my initial thoughts, BS and PB aren't the exact same film - but Darronfoskyakjsd DID buy the rights to this film to avoid any possible legal repercussions (which wouldn't have arisen, considering the director and head-honcho of the anime just died recently). Still - the bath scene was v. similar, the Subway scene is identical, and the narrative is extremely similar in terms of mood. Additionally, both women in both films seem to have become ruined by sexuality somehow. Awesome film to check out if you can find it around.

heh (kelpolaris), Thursday, 6 January 2011 05:25 (fifteen years ago)

also lol at throwing her stuffed animals down the trash shoot

yes! under-commented scene, got the biggest laff from me iirc. though i might have just said 'o gimme a f'in break' aloud.

goole, Thursday, 6 January 2011 06:19 (fifteen years ago)

i dont want to sound like this guy so ive held out until now but: this movie had a lot of v excellent new york details, good sense of place 4 sure

ice cr?m, Thursday, 6 January 2011 06:24 (fifteen years ago)

yes totally. the scene where she is walking under the scaffolding.

max, Thursday, 6 January 2011 06:29 (fifteen years ago)

the apartment like obvs its rent stabilized and theyve had it for a while otherwise they couldnt afford it, the layers of paint on the door the tons of art on the walls, you know who they are culturally

ice cr?m, Thursday, 6 January 2011 06:34 (fifteen years ago)

haha that terrible bar/restaurant they go to is very uws too

max, Thursday, 6 January 2011 06:35 (fifteen years ago)

yess

ice cr?m, Thursday, 6 January 2011 06:38 (fifteen years ago)

those guys were very sweaty. i remember thinking, 'darren, those guys, they're gross and sweaty, i think i get it'

goole, Thursday, 6 January 2011 06:41 (fifteen years ago)

when winona threw that huge expensive black leather bag over her shoulder and stormed out i realized something abt my experience

ice cr?m, Thursday, 6 January 2011 06:43 (fifteen years ago)

meant to go see this tonight, was gonna get the event together and everything, but then i just went out and had a piece of pizza and rented micmacs instead. so i am going to watch micmacs and pretend it contains an imaginary mila kunis lesbian interlude and a guy in a bird costume saying "hey."

carles marx (contenderizer), Thursday, 6 January 2011 07:25 (fifteen years ago)

micmacs was probably more fun than black swan

gr8080, Thursday, 6 January 2011 07:50 (fifteen years ago)

micmacs was awful

Gukbe, Thursday, 6 January 2011 07:50 (fifteen years ago)

perfect blue awesomeness seconded

"jobs" (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 6 January 2011 10:07 (fifteen years ago)

micmacs was awful

orange and tealest movie ever made

carles marx (contenderizer), Thursday, 6 January 2011 10:14 (fifteen years ago)

okay, so i did make it out to see the black swan tonight, in the rain. don't know that i've enjoyed any other theatrical film even half as much this year. i can see why showgirls comparisons might be made, but this was nowhere near as cartoonishly, inflatably ridiculous as that. it's ridiculous, of course, but in a very different way, evoking depalma at his best, everything stylized and heightened and pushed through lurid quasi-camp into a kind of ecstasy of perfectionist craft. the kubrick of eyes wide shut is another clear reference point, along with polanski's repulsion, and yeah, it's hard to ignore the huge debt to satoshi kon's perfect blue, which this seems almost to adapt.

anyway, the most depalma-like aspect, to me, was the heavy - near constant - reliance on reflection, perspective and viewing-through. nina was almost always seen to be surrounded by mirrors, often black mirrors, reflecting back not only her distorted perception of herself, but her petrified awareness of external observation and judgment. as it's a point-of-view piece framed through the eyes of this unstable protagonist, we're constantly reminded of the difference between semblance and reality, a wonderful theme for a film about the ballet. meanwhile, the occasional shakeycam and relentless focus on the act of looking forces us into awareness both of the camera that observes nina, an echo of her own paranoia, and her own observation of the world around her. loved the integration of all these layers and devices, in ways both subtle and almost deliriously obvious (framing nina through a break between two panes of a mirror when thomas, the director, announces that the lead must be able to portray both the white and the black swan, so that she momentarily appears as a double of herself). i think i love movies that concern themselves and play with the mechanisms and implications of perception more than almost anything else in cinema.

also enjoyed it as a sort of feminist critique of the expectations and demands placed upon women, especially beautiful women. the film, through nina's eyes, sees men as leering creeps, women as fickle rivals. to exist alone in a world where one is constantly the subject of masculine desire and interest, predatory interest. to have, at the same time, so fragile an ego that your self-worth becomes entirely dependent on satisfying - while at the same resisting - the demands that this male interest places on you. i'm not suggesting that this is the universal female condition, but it's hard not to read the film as a commentary on the terrible sacrifices some women are driven to make in order to maintain the illusion of perfection.

loved so many other little details. the pink cellphone screen when nina's mother called, mom's paintings, the reveal of the stuffed animals, "hey", portman's performance (when aronofsky didn't feel compelled to gunk it up with unnecessary digital trickery), etc. i suppose i felt that the film could have used a lighter touch here and there, but that's probably out the director's reach, and winona ryder's performance and character seemed wasted in a film that hardly cared about them. minor quibbles lodged against a movie i enjoyed immensely and will certainly return to more than once. it gave me exactly what i want most out of the cinema: a rich, compelling, lurid and overheated vision.

carles marx (contenderizer), Friday, 7 January 2011 07:02 (fifteen years ago)

So with this and Inception is ripping off/homaging anime officially a "trend" now.

Number None, Friday, 7 January 2011 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

Can't wait to see this.

The referee was perfect (Chris), Friday, 7 January 2011 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

i'm not suggesting that this is the universal female condition, but it's hard not to read the film as a commentary on the terrible sacrifices some women are driven to make in order to maintain the illusion of perfection.

some are even driven to perform in leering lesbo dream sequences!

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 15:34 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, I get everything yer saying but the symbolism was so obvious and writ-large that it drained all the mystery out. repulsion is as one-note and schematic as black swan, but has a boatload of irreconcilables and mystery, whereas black swan seems like the type of "deep" symbolism designed to excite lit major frosh or movie critics. there are two swans, one's black, one's white. get it??? there are mirrors everywhere! get it??? yeah yeah, I get it.

the film did help me put my finger on what I don't like about aronofsky's films. they strive for this wild hallucinatory steez but he's got the soul of a schoolboy so they never hit hard enough. you can't deny his technical ability but it's all flash. I actually liked the wrestler a lot, he does well with a grounded, kitchen sink drama. I wish the guy wanted to be more cassavetes and less jodorowsky.

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 15:50 (fifteen years ago)

i hear ya, i just think this particular movie thrives on really obvious symbolism

call all destroyer, Friday, 7 January 2011 15:52 (fifteen years ago)

once i heard the basic plot and thematic outline of this film I basically decided it was about Aronofsky himself...particularly a response to the reception of The Fountain.

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 15:54 (fifteen years ago)

also: nothing intrinsically wrong with your symbolism being obvious. it's not an easter egg hunt. it's more: is it resonant symbolism?

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

I guess the answer for me here would be "no"

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 15:55 (fifteen years ago)

finally saw this last night and was immensely entertained. i can see how people are calling it camp because how over the top it goes and i agree it's totally hilarious if you watch it with that expectation. but really, i felt the use of fantasy and heavy symbolism was really quite earnest, meant both to evoke the folk-tale origins of swan lake and to explore a preponderance of self-serious themes. i was kinda disappointed to see how the madness / genius fallacy was showcased so prominently, and how nina's madness was so blatantly 'hysterical.' but despite that, i really thought the movie was totally inventive and engaging in playing out those themes.

i was strongly reminded of _the piano teacher_ (the book; didn't see the film): the overly intimate relationship with the controlling mother; the rigid technicality of the repressed female artist; the self-mutilation; the tension of control vs. expression with regard to art and sex.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 7 January 2011 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

edward i feel like thats legit criticism of aronofsky up til now, but this one was playful and had a sense of humor abt itself enlivening what mightve otherwise been a p ponderous set up

maybe aronofsky realized he was ridiculous and insufferable after the failure of tree of life leading him to go back to basics w/the wrestler and then try again but w/feeling this time for black swan

contenderizers depalma comparison has some resonance, tho rating it w/his best is just out of bounds

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 15:59 (fifteen years ago)

black swan has a lot of parallels with the wrestler

both about comically archaic subcultures where suicidal fuckups destroy their bodies

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:00 (fifteen years ago)

finally saw this last night and was immensely entertained. i can see how people are calling it camp because how over the top it goes and i agree it's totally hilarious if you watch it with that expectation. but really, i felt the use of fantasy and heavy symbolism was really quite earnest, meant both to evoke the folk-tale origins of swan lake and to explore a preponderance of self-serious themes. i was kinda disappointed to see how the madness / genius fallacy was showcased so prominently, and how nina's madness was so blatantly 'hysterical.' but despite that, i really thought the movie was totally inventive and engaging in playing out those themes.

I sort of feel like there was no direction for Nina's madness to go except for "hysterical", given the crazy repressed point from which she started and what she was being screamed at to do.

The madness/genius fallacy would probably bother me more if I didn't know so many batshit insane ppl who are tops or near the top of their field (lol Ivy League). Also, and I think this gets undersold a lot in the discussion of the movie, it was already determined from the beginning that Nina was an excellent dancer AND also crazy; the movie struck me more about the evolution of her psychosis allowing her to express her talent in a different manner rather than her "going crazy" to become a better dancer. The first half of the movie spends a lot of time harping on how her White Swan is immaculate; you don't get that from being kind of okay.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

What's the right word to describe De Palma's style if not "camp"? Because I agree that straight camp is a misnomer. Operatic?

Whatever it is, I can imagine De Palma's making a nearly identical version of this in 1981, with Debra Winger, Farrah Fawcett-Majors, and John Lithgow -- or, better yet, Tony Randall.

the point at which the whole world gets to try on the glasses (Eazy), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:08 (fifteen years ago)

yea ultimately i think this movie is better and more entertaining as delirious campy romp thru the darkness rather than the serious overwrought psychodrama that i suspect it wants to be.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:08 (fifteen years ago)

theres no way this movie is taking itself totally seriously, all the horror movie shit, bird man saying 'sup', the cliched stage mom etc etc, plz people

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

the serious overwrought psychodrama that i suspect it wants to be.

have we not already debunked this?

call all destroyer, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:12 (fifteen years ago)

did aronofsky say something either way?

da croupier, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:14 (fifteen years ago)

It's easy to come up with a list of directors who want it (and, get their best get it) both ways, Hitchcock being a prime example. The ones who know that laughter, surprise, and shock affect the same neurons in the brain.

the point at which the whole world gets to try on the glasses (Eazy), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:15 (fifteen years ago)

(Ugh, I can't type today. Who want it and (at their best, get it) both ways.)

the point at which the whole world gets to try on the glasses (Eazy), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

yeah otm

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:16 (fifteen years ago)

i dont think you can 'debunk' someone feeling differently about a movie than you

Princess TamTam, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:19 (fifteen years ago)

again, the script seems to predate DA's involvement. I think he decided to approach it 'playfully' because played 'straighter' ppl would laugh even more.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

this movie is really up my alley, I was looking forward to seeing it. kinda bummed it couldn't deliver the goods.

re: taking itself seriously, aronofsky seems to be going for some kubrickian schadenfreude of the absurd, but while the dude's accomplished he's no kubrick, so it ends up being NAGL when you're just laughing at a tortured ballerina for 2 hours. if you do take it seriously then the movie is pretty turgid. and a balance wasn't struck between either of these poles, part of the movie's failings for me.

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

well yah but the continual suspicion that this was angling to be a "deep" or "serious" movie is mostly based on who directed it, not on anything that happens on the screen.

call all destroyer, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:20 (fifteen years ago)

YA BEEN DEBUNKED

da croupier, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:21 (fifteen years ago)

i've been encountering plenty of people who read very little camp value into it... i mean a lot of people thought the Exorcist was a howler too, y'know?

Princess TamTam, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:22 (fifteen years ago)

YA DEBUNK YA

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

http://grab.by/8fz2
howl

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

awoooo

Princess TamTam, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:25 (fifteen years ago)

well yah but the continual suspicion that this was angling to be a "deep" or "serious" movie is mostly based on who directed it, not on anything that happens on the screen.

don't really agree w/ this, I mean you've got a bunch of psycho ballerinas being led by this superintense sevengali down a dark path w/ freudian symbolism laid on with a trowel, it's not like dude made hot tub time machine

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:26 (fifteen years ago)

this is not the poster for a wacky camp thrill ride

http://img.perezhilton.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/new-black-swan-posters-released__oPt.jpg

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe ridiculous is the right word, in the Charles Ludlam sense. Hitchcock, De Palma, and this movie, all making ridiculous psychosexual thrillers that aim to work on two levels at once. Not unlike dreams, eh?

the point at which the whole world gets to try on the glasses (Eazy), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)

I think some of you guys have a very different definition of "camp" from me, or are maybe using it as a synonym for "melodrama"...?

I don't know why being serious has to preclude containing any humor, either.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:28 (fifteen years ago)

and you've got a main character literally transforming into a bird and winona ryder stabbing herself in the face!

i mean--i'm not really up for arguing about this much more, but as someone who's been v. hard on aronofsky in the past the shift in tone here was easy to see. the wrestler, with all its estranged daughters and strippers with hearts of gold, was the film that was actually aspiring to "seriousness."

call all destroyer, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:29 (fifteen years ago)

i dont think the suffering and heavy symbolism was exactly played for lolz - it just had some aspect of humor and awareness operating

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

yeah i dunno like i said it reads either way, i just think that this was a really entertaining but ultimately earnest attempt to explore serious themes about body image, sex, madness, talent, etc etc. like ok:

***SPOIL***SPOIL***SPOIL***

the final sequence where she has stabbed herself in the womb with a goddamn mirror and dies bleeding from a vaginal wound blooming through her white dress: i don't think this was played for chuckles!

just because the symbolism is heavy and obvious doesn't mean it's not without serious intent (just ask toni morrison)

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

oh man now we are arguing via movie poster

call all destroyer, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

not really sure "camp" means anything anymore. or at the very least determining if something is to be taken "seriously" or not really means anything? are we really that anxious about being hoodwinked or tricked by art into thinking it means something?

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

or did she stab herself ???

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

or did she stab herself ???

haha see that's where I was at by the end of the movie

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

i guess this comes down to what you think the film's priorities are--i see any exploration of the themes elmo mentions as being v. subordinate to shocking, frightening, and delighting the audience--which is why this is a horror movie.

call all destroyer, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

although I enjoyed Inception a hell of a lot, this Black Swan was way more effective at being disorienting re: what's real and what isn't

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

From Charles Ludlam's manifesto for Theater of the Ridiculous:

Bathos is that which is intended to be sorrowful but because of the extremity of its expression becomes comic. Pathos is that which is meant to be comic but because of the extremity of its expression becomes sorrowful. Some things which seem to be opposites are actually different degrees of the same thing.

This is farce, not Sunday school. Illustrate hedonistic calculus. Test out a dangerous idea, a theme that threatens to destroy one's whole value system. Treat the material in a madly farcical manner without losing the seriousness of the theme. Show how paradoxes arrest the mind. Scare yourself a bit along the way

the point at which the whole world gets to try on the glasses (Eazy), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

i covered this back in december yall

max, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

its ok to be invested in a campy/hilarious movie!! its possible to have a movie that hits both serious and funny emotional cues!!

― max, Sunday, December 26, 2010 7:35 PM (1 week ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

max, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

"camp" now used as shorthand by moviegoers who want to condescend and laugh at anything, like the fucks at NYC's Film Forum. (Ivan the Terrible, Rififi, Metropolis etc)

But w/out laughs this film wd be truly empty.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

max otm in december.

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

that's probably my other problem, I'm a jaded horror movie fan, so this really didn't cut the mustard as far as bringing the scares

it ended up being a thrill ride without thrills

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

max otm re the date he posted being in december

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:37 (fifteen years ago)

tho i feel like in this debate, which happens a LOT, speaks more to containing and controlling our reactions to art...it's a self-protective gesture.

xposts

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

It's funny, because the whole spirit of ILX conversation is the combination of aiming for salient points in a playful manner, with the breeziness making a point more visceral instead of less profound. Max hit it on the nose there.

the point at which the whole world gets to try on the glasses (Eazy), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

in december

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

max is right, once a year, in december

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:39 (fifteen years ago)

just noticed it was dec 26! i feel cheated.

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:39 (fifteen years ago)

better luck this year

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

a late christmas present from max, in december

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

my xmas gift to you all

xp lol

max, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

idk i thought earnestness was a precondition of camp -- if you're going by the sontag handbook i mean

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:45 (fifteen years ago)

camp contains multitudes

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

mommie dearest and rocky horror are both camp in my book, that's a pretty wide gulf

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

I don't really think this movie was nonstop campy lols the whole way through. There were a bunch of things that I thought were funny but it takes way more emotional detachment than I had while watching this to describe the vast majority of this movie as "campy".

xp: "Mommie Dearest" is camp because of how it has dated

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

idk why black swan isn't camp

maybe if I post more movie posters we will get to the bottom of this

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

oh god let's not debate why mommie dearest is camp it's like staring into the abyss

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

i think Mommie Dearest was seen as camp from the get-go?

Roughly a month into release, Paramount realized the film was getting a reputation and box office as an unintentional comedy, and changed its advertising to reflect its new camp status, proclaiming, "Meet the biggest MOTHER of them all!"[4]

Princess TamTam, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

well actual definitions don't hold much sway in these discussions, elmo.

I blanch at bringing Hitchcock into this; the attitudes and emotions in his thrillers were usually adult ones, while in BS they are all adolescent except for the ones that imitate adults in old movies (eg, Mom's harbored bitterness over giving up career for daughter).

The idea that supreme art comes from feeling rather than craft is a hoary one, and treated w/ seeming, unfortunate seriousness in this film. Lots of passionate bad art out there.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:51 (fifteen years ago)

id be totally fine w/retiring the word 'camp' from all black swan based discussions

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

"Mommie Dearest" is camp because of how it has dated

yeah, balls! it was ridiculed from day one. I guess we can add the early '80s to Millennials' "THEY WERE SO STUPID BACK THEN" timeframe.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

morbs otm re: adults, during black swan I was getting the increasing feeling of being subjected to the daydreams of a horny emo teenager with an expensive camera

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

yeah morbs i really only think sontag is relevant because she treats camp not only as an aesthetic but also as a way of seeing

but u r OTM w/ this:

The idea that supreme art comes from feeling rather than craft is a hoary one, and treated w/ seeming, unfortunate seriousness in this film. Lots of passionate bad art out there.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

Wild horses could not drag me to see this movie. Though I always love to Mila Kunis.

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

Black Swan + The Social Network = teenage dreams take you to the top and the bottom.

the point at which the whole world gets to try on the glasses (Eazy), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

The idea that supreme art comes from feeling rather than craft is a hoary one, and treated w/ seeming, unfortunate seriousness in this film. Lots of passionate bad art out there.

actually disagree w/ this tho, black swan seems to say craft needs feeling to be fully effective and well that's true and pursuing those feelings and not finding them can make you feel like a failure as an artist (also true)

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

Morbs, the thing about "feeling" in this movie that isn't really spelled out all that well but something I took away (largely due to the environment I live in, surrounded by overeducated overachievers) is that her ability to "feel" the Black Swan would have been impossible without the work and precision she put into her White Swan. If she didn't have the goods, she wouldn't have been able to pull it off; also, this was why Lily was the understudy and not a straight double-casting (if the gulf between them was THAT large and Lily was THAT good at being the Black Swan, I feel like they would have just made her the Black Swan, or at least that's how it would have worked in my imagined "real world").

So, while I completely agree with the sentiment of what you're saying, I do think there was a bunch of background assumptive material in the movie that works against the simplistic idea of "true art is just about letting go".

xp: Morbs we are very close to being the same age IIRC; please ecuse me for not being obsessed with Mommie Dearest enough to know the minutiae of how it was perceived upon release.

xxp: grr this is why I make short posts

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 16:59 (fifteen years ago)

"camp" is just being used as a substituted for like "ott-ness" for a lot of people in this thread i think

max, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:01 (fifteen years ago)

craft needs feeling to be fully effective and well that's true

Prove it.

As a big fan of both Kubrick and Stephin Merritt, I hear them both being called "cold" all the time, but as none of us can be inside another's skin I have no idea if they feel/felt more of less than "sincere" artists (another ridiculous purported measure).

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:02 (fifteen years ago)

doc morbius otm

max, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

pulling out kubrick is like going for the exception to prove the rule, he's like beyond normative

either way the whole exploration of apollonian/dionysian dichotomies is as effective in black swan as it is in the works of jim morrison

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

i dont know if feeling or letting go is necessary for great art - but intense craft and study married w/relaxation and emotion is def observable in a lot of great art

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

kubrick was exceptionally passionate as a person for the things that fascinated him, that doesn't have much bearing on whether the end product of his films were cold

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:05 (fifteen years ago)

I'm with Morbs on this in theory; I think the thing that confuses Black Swan is that the director was expressly demanding that Nina "let go" to be what he want the Black Swan to be, and she couldn't figure out how to get that to happen without turning from a repressed stalkerish bulimic into a hedonistic bullying murderess. Behind all of it, the tight control and craft that made her such an effective White Swan was still there.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:05 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, thought the movie made that abundantly clear

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

also kubrick = director, ballerina girl = performer so the mechanics are a little diff

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

actually found it sort of thematically confusing in that regard. she kills Nina, who represents the black swan in her psyche, and now they are integrated? if it was the REAL nina it would have made more sense. Or maybe the integration happened when they had sex? then why did she have to kill her?

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

or maybe the murder means that it's NOT an integration but a domination of the black by the white? using it for its own purposes?

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

sorry, kills LILY

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:18 (fifteen years ago)

I thought it was domination, personally.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:18 (fifteen years ago)

I've seen a lot of technically competent performers from a wide array of disciplines who have trouble channeling their feelings or passion into their art, and it makes for some unengaging evenings. I've also seen a lot of folks with no craft who go on complete feeling and do some pretty stupid indulgent stuff.

the audition scene in mulholland drive is one of the best examples of "get your emotions into the performance", showing you what that means in a very meta way.

lot of parallels between mulholland drive and black swan too, and comparing them shows how far aronofsky falls short of what can be accomplished with these materials.

xp way behind

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:19 (fifteen years ago)

I guess the SPOILERS are outta the barn

*
*
*

funny, i didnt think either the sex or the killing were 'real' -- i have trouble w/ this in infinitely silly movies.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:19 (fifteen years ago)

if domination that's certainly more interesting. maybe the aftermath of the sex scene (Lily laughing at her) entails a failed integration.

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

i dunno, as far as camp goes, you could compare black swan to stuff paul thomas anderson has done: packed with feeling, ridiculous, absolutely serious, and nearly unwatchable

goole, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

actually found it sort of thematically confusing in that regard. she kills Nina, who represents the black swan in her psyche, and now they are integrated? if it was the REAL nina it would have made more sense. Or maybe the integration happened when they had sex? then why did she have to kill her?

― ryan, Friday, January 7, 2011 12:14 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark

not sure what this means? nina=portman, lily=kunis

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

comparing this movie to kubrick depalma hitchcock and now lynch is KIND OF unfair

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

haha yes, I was about to post that

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

E3: i corrected myself. (though obviously in both scenes Lily morphs into Nina.)

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:23 (fifteen years ago)

comparing it to PTA is though, can't stand that guy's stuff either tho I sat out punchdrunk love and there will be milkshake

xp

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:23 (fifteen years ago)

punchdrunk love and there will be milkshake are both wonderful

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:24 (fifteen years ago)

if you liked PDL i seriously doubt your judgment on any other artwork, object, event or person

goole, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:25 (fifteen years ago)

on a symbolic level, nina is killing lily to eliminate the competition and steal her spirit-strength, it's a primal final ritual to complete her transformation. she absorbs the darkness through an act of transgression.

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

AND SHE KILLS HER WITH A MIRROR DO YOU GET IT NUDGE NUDGE

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

I'll back off from my initial claim that the film is camp, but its attitudes towards women -- working women especially -- are very gross.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:26 (fifteen years ago)

comparing it to De Palma is entirely fair, why do you think Eric H liked it so much?

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:27 (fifteen years ago)

if you liked PDL i seriously doubt your judgment on any other artwork, object, event or person

― goole, Friday, January 7, 2011 12:25 PM (42 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah well i seriously doubt u r even a person

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:27 (fifteen years ago)

i feel like ice cr?m is gooles black swan

max, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:29 (fifteen years ago)

on a symbolic level, nina is killing lily to eliminate the competition and steal her spirit-strength, it's a primal final ritual to complete her transformation. she absorbs the darkness through an act of transgression.

i think you're right. tho the movie drastically lowers the stakes by making it all in Nina's head...

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:29 (fifteen years ago)

gif it and loop it goole

YOU WILL BE PERFECT

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:29 (fifteen years ago)

http://grab.by/8fDh

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

tho the movie drastically lowers the stakes by making it all in Nina's head...

don't agree with this at all

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:31 (fifteen years ago)

I was kind of hoping that there would be a more explicit revelation that Nina stabbed Winona Ryder in the face with that letter opener

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:31 (fifteen years ago)

it's all in her head, no mortal stakes except her own

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:32 (fifteen years ago)

the mother's obsessive terrible paintings do give an example of passionate art that fails for lack of discipline.

but i think the emphasis here is not on craft -- her discipline & skill are given. perform to the level of genius requires her not just to moderate her technique but to lose herself in a terrifying way -- not just 'expressing her feelings' but also the utter breakdown of her former identity and its boundaries, complete with delusions, disfigurement, and transformation

like i can see what u mean e3 but this film doesn't really explore the distinction between good and bad art, but the difference between good and genius (and the price that must be paid for genius, blah blah)

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:32 (fifteen years ago)

physically actualizing the violence would've made her less of a boohoo tragic princess and more a fearsome harpy and perhaps more effective but that could just be the horror geek in me talking

xp

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:33 (fifteen years ago)

it's all in her head, no mortal stakes except her own

it's all just a movie, no mortal stakes at all

I mean, if you want to go that route, go all the way.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:34 (fifteen years ago)

I'll back off from my initial claim that the film is camp, but its attitudes towards women -- working women especially -- are very gross.

― Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, January 7, 2011 12:26 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark

could u expand on this

Princess TamTam, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:35 (fifteen years ago)

I mean Jordan, that if its an act of transgression, then symbolically murdering someone isn't really that transgressive...i guess the point in the movie is that she THOUGHT she had transgressed...

agreed DJP but we're starting at the boundaries of the movie's universe. there's no stakes IN the movie.

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

making it all internal robs a lot of the danger from all this...ultimately the madness of her art is just self-abuse...

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:37 (fifteen years ago)

which i guess is why she has to die at the end, so that there's some consequence.

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:38 (fifteen years ago)

but i think the emphasis here is not on craft -- her discipline & skill are given. perform to the level of genius requires her not just to moderate her technique but to lose herself in a terrifying way -- not just 'expressing her feelings' but also the utter breakdown of her former identity and its boundaries, complete with delusions, disfigurement, and transformation

like i can see what u mean e3 but this film doesn't really explore the distinction between good and bad art, but the difference between good and genius (and the price that must be paid for genius, blah blah)

agree with the latter but not the former, at least to the extent that she isn't "required" to lose her mind, she just does. she's a failure as a total artist cuz she can't live in the world of emotions without self-destructing, which makes her the mirror image of lily who lives in that world but doesn't have the discipline to be a great technician (reading in a little bit but that's what I took away). which is the afterschool special version of being a great artist, makes a good bookend with requiem for a dream which is the afterschool special of being a drug addict.

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:39 (fifteen years ago)

This would totally make a good double feature with Dressed to Kill.

I wouldn't be surprised if Aranofsky has a career similar to De Palma. The Wrestler is his Casualties of War, while his worst is on par with Raising Cain. They are equals as far as technical proficiency, love of the psychosexual thriller full of shocks, and putting their characters wholly through the ringer.

the point at which the whole world gets to try on the glasses (Eazy), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

I don't remember so much mutilation in my afterschool specials

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

at least you all are renting The Red Shoes and Repulsion bcz of this

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

yeah. i think if there's a point in there then it's that the white/black swan can't really coexist--they are mutually destructive. hence she dies.

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

could u expand on this

― Princess TamTam,

All the women are Victorian archetypes, neither tweaked nor parodied.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

I wouldn't be surprised if Aranofsky has a career similar to De Palma. The Wrestler is his Casualties of War, while his worst is on par with Raising Cain. They are equals as far as technical proficiency, love of the psychosexual thriller full of shocks, and putting their characters wholly through the ringer.

― the point at which the whole world gets to try on the glasses (Eazy), Friday, January 7, 2011 12:40 PM (12 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

NO

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

goes back to my earlier point about aronofsky being all flash - beneath all the self-mutilation and jump cuts is a schoolboy morality

xp to dan

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

De Palma is, what, deeper? Better technically?

the point at which the whole world gets to try on the glasses (Eazy), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

if this movie was all schoolboy morality, that lesbian scene would have been expanded to fill the entire movie, after which they would have both been run over by a monster truck

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:43 (fifteen years ago)

man what school did you go to

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:44 (fifteen years ago)

schoolboys are turned on by lesbian scenes afaik

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:45 (fifteen years ago)

didn't know crushing lesbians with monster trucks was a schoolboy fantasy, starting a new website brb

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

De Palma is, what, deeper? Better technically?

― the point at which the whole world gets to try on the glasses (Eazy), Friday, January 7, 2011 12:43 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

im sry i cant discuss this

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

"de palma" "all flash"
About 5,960 results (0.21 seconds)

the point at which the whole world gets to try on the glasses (Eazy), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:47 (fifteen years ago)

dykecrusher.com is taken guys what should I go with

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:47 (fifteen years ago)

(No prob, cr?m, not tryin to spend the day debating on the internet)

the point at which the whole world gets to try on the glasses (Eazy), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

Max taking us
http://cdn.buzznet.com/media-cdn/jj1/headlines/2010/10/taylor-swift-back-to-december.jpg

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

max is v. v. pretty

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

I wouldn't be surprised if Aranofsky has a career similar to De Palma. The Wrestler is his Casualties of War,

this would be the crux of my NO - Casualties Of War was the culmination of two decades of work, The Wrestler was an easy oscar shot after The Fountain bombed.

da croupier, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:50 (fifteen years ago)

depalma's made more entertaining movies but 'ofsky is young and still has a lot of career ahead of him

since repulsion was brought up again i'll say that BS doesnt hold up to any of polanski's best because it doesnt really develop any of the characters, you're never really attached to natalie portman, you're just watching the freakshow escalate - its just a really good freakshow

but i think an interesting side effect of not caring about portman's char is that you're not sad when she dies, and it's actually kinda cool and happy

Princess TamTam, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:51 (fifteen years ago)

lol jaymc

Princess TamTam, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:51 (fifteen years ago)

at least to the extent that she isn't "required" to lose her mind, she just does

see i think the internal logic of the film requires her to go insane; there's no moderate way to genius blah blah ho hum

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:52 (fifteen years ago)

the wrestler was totes better than casualties of war btw

Princess TamTam, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:52 (fifteen years ago)

But SHE ALREADY IS INSANE from the very beginning of the movie!

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:53 (fifteen years ago)

I mean Jordan, that if its an act of transgression, then symbolically murdering someone isn't really that transgressive...i guess the point in the movie is that she THOUGHT she had transgressed...

i think having a psychotic break and becoming suicidally dangerous (and obviously a danger to others, even if she didn't actually kill anyone) is enough for some drama, and probably more interesting than becoming a homicidal ballerina

many xps

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:54 (fifteen years ago)

nothing more interesting than homicidal ballerinas tbrr this is the film's great failure

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

the wrestler was totes better than casualties of war btw

wasn't really playing "which movie's better" (though i disagree), so much as noting one movie was a prolific director's most emotionally daring work yet, where the other was a relative young guy's downscale after a failed megaepic.

da croupier, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:56 (fifteen years ago)

But SHE ALREADY IS INSANE from the very beginning of the movie!

To expand upon this, there's the nonstop stress scratching, the stealing of Winona's shit so she can become her, the bulimic reaction to stress and the anorexic reactions to food, the overly adolescent room, etc etc etc.

I don't know, it just seemed really obvious to me as the movie went on that she was never right in the head.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:57 (fifteen years ago)

yea dan she's not ok or healthy at the start of the film but she's doesn't go totally off the rails until a good while later, i mean there's a pretty obvious descent and she has to totally lose her shit to become "perfect"

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:57 (fifteen years ago)

totally, and the high-pressure situation finally pushed her over the edge

xp

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:58 (fifteen years ago)

wasn't really playing "which movie's better" (though i disagree), so much as noting one movie was a prolific director's most emotionally daring work yet, where the other was a relative young guy's downscale after a failed megaepic.

― da croupier, Friday, January 7, 2011 12:56 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

oic

Princess TamTam, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:58 (fifteen years ago)

at least to the extent that she isn't "required" to lose her mind, she just does

see i think the internal logic of the film requires her to go insane; there's no moderate way to genius blah blah ho hum

― tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, January 7, 2011 12:52 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark

I guess what I'm trying to say is that the film isn't advancing the theory that to be a great genius you must go totally batshit insane, just that you do need to lose yourself and here is an example of one person who couldn't handle it

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:58 (fifteen years ago)

part of my problem with Black Swan is that since he was using every human scale "she's crazy" cinematic trick from the get-go he had to start literalizing hallucinations with CGI Jan De Bont style to actually ratchet up the drama.

da croupier, Friday, 7 January 2011 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

i mean at the beginning she's only holding it together because her life is 100% controlled by outside forces (mom, practice, ballet rituals, etc.)

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Friday, 7 January 2011 17:59 (fifteen years ago)

yea dan she's not ok or healthy at the start of the film but she's doesn't go totally off the rails until a good while later, i mean there's a pretty obvious descent and she has to totally lose her shit to become "perfect"

But this wasn't the first time she'd gone completely nutso if her mother is to be trusted; it was just a different manifestation of it.

I think it is framed as a descent right up to the point where she beats the shit out of her mother, at which point I felt it was revealed as a sidle.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 18:02 (fifteen years ago)

just that you do need to lose yourself and here is an example of one person who couldn't handle it

Would like to see 8 Mile given the Black Swan treatment, complete with Proof blowjob and onstage rap-battle death scene.

the point at which the whole world gets to try on the glasses (Eazy), Friday, 7 January 2011 18:03 (fifteen years ago)

part of my problem with Black Swan is that since he was using every human scale "she's crazy" cinematic trick from the get-go he had to start literalizing hallucinations with CGI Jan De Bont style to actually ratchet up the drama.

― da croupier, Friday, January 7, 2011 12:59 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark

i think this is why i liked it!

call all destroyer, Friday, 7 January 2011 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

it would be fucking boring if she started sane and ended up human-scale crazy!

call all destroyer, Friday, 7 January 2011 18:04 (fifteen years ago)

the equation of going nuts w/growing up was kinda of sly and hilarious

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 18:05 (fifteen years ago)

lol the part where she owned her mom's hand was awesome

Princess TamTam, Friday, 7 January 2011 18:05 (fifteen years ago)

the film isn't advancing the theory that to be a great genius you must go totally batshit insane, just that you do need to lose yourself and here is an example of one person who couldn't handle it

the only thing that prevents me from agreeing with this is the lack of counter-examples -- there are no other genius artists shown in the film, unless you want to count beth, but I wouldn't because her success is pretty solidly attributed to her affair with the director

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 7 January 2011 18:05 (fifteen years ago)

im the swan queen, b*tch

Princess TamTam, Friday, 7 January 2011 18:06 (fifteen years ago)

y'know after I posted that I was like I just quoted eminem kill me know black swan kill me now

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 18:10 (fifteen years ago)

no, I def wouldn't point to beth as an example of a noncrazy person, actually thought winona ryder did a great job playing herself

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 18:12 (fifteen years ago)

and if aronofsky's point is "art must drive all performers to acts of suicidal madness!" then I like this film a lot less than I already did, thanks

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 18:13 (fifteen years ago)

I think there is a lot of glossing over the emotional and mental state of the main character here being made in order to make a point about what the requirements of "great art" are. The "you must be crazy to be a great artist" argument being advanced ring false to me because she was already a great artist AND she was already crazy and that wasn't good enough for the company's director. He demanded that she do something that she couldn't really do, and she did it, and in the process she maybe killed herself.

I feel like there's more metacommentary on life in an ever-shrinking global world than there is on what it takes to be a great artist.

the only thing that prevents me from agreeing with this is the lack of counter-examples -- there are no other genius artists shown in the film, unless you want to count beth, but I wouldn't because her success is pretty solidly attributed to her affair with the director

Given that we never actually get to see her dance, we don't know one way or the other if she was any good or if she slept her way to the top. We do know that in Lily, there's a representation of the type of carefree spirit the director is looking for in the Black Swan, but even she is still the understudy and not double-cast with Nina (which is what I thought was going to happen before I saw the movie). Even there, technicality and precision are valued higher than letting go and feeling it.

It really felt more like Nina's madness held her back until this opportunity came along more than she needed to go mad in order to truly shine; the role reinforced turmoil and confusion that was already going through her head.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

"art must drive all performers to acts of suicidal madness!"

Not just performers, most art biopics like van Gogh.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 January 2011 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

it would be fucking boring if she started sane and ended up human-scale crazy!

i'm talking about the movie starting crazy and ending in CGI pyrotechnics. i can see someone liking it, but I found stuff like the painting literally laughing at her pretty corny and uneffective

da croupier, Friday, 7 January 2011 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

and if aronofsky's point is "art must drive all performers to acts of suicidal madness!" then I like this film a lot less than I already did, thanks

― i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, January 7, 2011 1:13 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark

i mean this would be the exact kind of simplistic, overreaching "message" that no one should find in this movie.

djp's take much more sensible.

call all destroyer, Friday, 7 January 2011 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

anyway yeah some of the themes are really tiresome but i totally enjoyed it nonetheless

even tho the sound design was totally distracting at times -- HARK! THE RASPING SIGH OF THE BLACK SWAN -- the infinity mirror scene in the costume shop was cool when she confronts lily and you realize the black swan sound was actually the sewing machines in the background. that was neat.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 7 January 2011 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

i don't remember this laughing painting scene, or the chinese version I saw deftly excised it. did they do some cutting after the theatrical release?

Philip Nunez, Friday, 7 January 2011 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

after winona face stab iirc

she goes into mom's painting room and all the portraits are CGI laffing

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 18:23 (fifteen years ago)

the version I saw (or misremembered) is that the paintings were pretty terrible before, and are either the same or very subtly changed to be even worse, but I don't remember them animatedly laughing.

Philip Nunez, Friday, 7 January 2011 18:31 (fifteen years ago)

well no, she runs into her mother's studio and all of the faces are straight-up moving and cackling at her like demons

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

tbh i don't see "artists must go mad to achieve genius" as the *point* of the film at all, i just think the madness & genius correlation is something audiences are already v familiar with and d.a. just exploits that trope to the extreme

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 7 January 2011 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

the beautiful mind of a black swan if u will

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 7 January 2011 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

yup good call

call all destroyer, Friday, 7 January 2011 18:36 (fifteen years ago)

my beautiful black twisted swan

ice cr?m, Friday, 7 January 2011 18:37 (fifteen years ago)

i was going into this thinking it was going to be 'carrie' but with murder bird instead of telekinesis, where ballet and not-menstruating is the trigger instead of prom and menstruating.

Philip Nunez, Friday, 7 January 2011 18:41 (fifteen years ago)

instead it was the agony and the lesbian ecstasy

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 18:42 (fifteen years ago)

Again like The Social Network, the main character's pathologies are also the catalyst for what she achieves.

the point at which the whole world gets to try on the glasses (Eazy), Friday, 7 January 2011 18:44 (fifteen years ago)

it's like that julia stiles ballet movie but instead of learning hip-hop dance she transmogrifies into a seducting bird lady

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 7 January 2011 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

Ballet: it's Fight Club for ladies

da croupier, Friday, 7 January 2011 18:46 (fifteen years ago)

"she transmogrifies into a seducting bird lady"
http://img53.exs.cx/img53/4085/l8gchickenlady.jpg
??

Philip Nunez, Friday, 7 January 2011 18:49 (fifteen years ago)

^ turns out that was just dave foley's hallucination

da croupier, Friday, 7 January 2011 18:53 (fifteen years ago)

well no, she runs into her mother's studio and all of the faces are straight-up moving and cackling at her like demons

there's an earlier scene where you can see the eyes of one of the paintings move iirc, i feel like there are a lot of little tricks like that sprinkled thru the film. i already want to watch it again tbh.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 7 January 2011 19:00 (fifteen years ago)

the final sequence where she has stabbed herself in the womb with a goddamn mirror and dies bleeding from a vaginal wound blooming through her white dress...

― tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, January 7, 2011 8:30 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark

just wanted to point this out cuz it's OTM and reflects (ha) interestingly on how nina's psychology and self-destruction are being interpreted by some in this thread. movie's about sexual fear and anxiety as much as anything else, the return of the repressed. we only have the director's word for it that nina is unable to perform "perfectly" as the black swan, and he's clearly manipulating her insecurities to get what he wants out of her. he crudely sexualizes the idea of perfection in the role (if her perceptions of him are to be trusted at all), but because he's profoundly underestimated her insecurities, this drives her over the edge. she's unable to integrate her idea of perfection and her ideas about sex. the best she can do is to fuck herself to death with a broken mirror shaped like her imaginary rival.

carles marx (contenderizer), Friday, 7 January 2011 21:09 (fifteen years ago)

I think the only real problem I have with that reading is that, last time I checked, the vagina wasn't in a woman's stomach...?

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 21:12 (fifteen years ago)

the vagina is a symbol of a vagina

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

I have just summarized this film ty gn

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 21:14 (fifteen years ago)

that's probably my other problem, I'm a jaded horror movie fan, so this really didn't cut the mustard as far as bringing the scares

it ended up being a thrill ride without thrills

― i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, January 7, 2011 8:37 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark

the effectiveness of horror thrills is subjective of course, but i'm at least as jaded a horror fan as you, and i loved the movie on that level. it didn't scare me to death, but i jumped a couple times, and suspenseful moments had me entirely hooked. there are aspects that did and didn't work for me (madly laughing mom paintings failed entirely, for ex), but i think it's one of the best horror movies i've seen recently.

carles marx (contenderizer), Friday, 7 January 2011 21:18 (fifteen years ago)

I think the only real problem I have with that reading is that, last time I checked, the vagina wasn't in a woman's stomach...?

― Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, January 7, 2011 1:12 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark

nina's a little shakey on the mechanics of reproduction

carles marx (contenderizer), Friday, 7 January 2011 21:19 (fifteen years ago)

haha dan anatomical placement aside it really looked like she was menstruating to death, it wasn't exactly subtle

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 7 January 2011 21:24 (fifteen years ago)

well sure, hence "my only real problem"; it strikes me as valid, I just didn't go there because, well... that's not where the vagina is

signed, Captain Literal

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 21:25 (fifteen years ago)

you do clearly see her get stabbed in the stomach, so i just went with that!

call all destroyer, Friday, 7 January 2011 21:26 (fifteen years ago)

catching up on this morning's activity itt:

lot of parallels between mulholland drive and black swan too, and comparing them shows how far aronofsky falls short of what can be accomplished with these materials.

[jumping ahead a few posts...] on a symbolic level, nina is killing lily to eliminate the competition and steal her spirit-strength, it's a primal final ritual to complete her transformation. she absorbs the darkness through an act of transgression.

― i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, January 7, 2011 9:26 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark

lynch comparison is unfair. lynch operates in a cinematic universe of his own making to an extent that has no real parallel in contemporary american popular film. and while there are many parallels between mulholland dr. (hey, it's "mulholland dream" as much as "mulholland drive") and black swan, they're ultimately very different films, not only in story, but in mechanics and intent. if you want to put black swan down for not living up to what it resembles, compare it to repulsion. repulsion's a better movie, imo, but not by a huge margin, just a comfortable one.

i fundamentally disagree with edward and morbs in that i think this film makes no point about the relationship between genius, craft and "letting go." nina is pathologically repressed and fearful, to the point where she's a real threat to herself and perhaps to others around her. it's the profound pathology of her repression that's an obstacle to her performance, not her failure to simply "let go." director thomas senses that he can manipulate nina by encouraging her to open up (so to speak), pushing her towards the sort of performance and relationship he desires, but that's his perpective, not the film's.

she ultimately does both let go, plunging fully into her madness, and deliver a brilliant final performance, but she accomplishes this not by "surrendering to feeling" in the manner that the director and his stupid cliche intend. instead, she violently forces an integration of her ideas of perfection and sex, destroying herself in the process. black swan isn't a film about genius learning to let go. it's a film about madness consuming itself.

carles marx (contenderizer), Friday, 7 January 2011 21:38 (fifteen years ago)

that last line is completely OTM and why I think the detail of her being completely cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs from the very beginning of the movie isn't one you can or should ignore

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 21:42 (fifteen years ago)

also, i formally regret comparing this movie to depalma "at his best." depalma's best (body double, femme fatale) eats this for breakfast. but black swan's a respectable heir, and, hopefully, a signpost for things to come.

carles marx (contenderizer), Friday, 7 January 2011 21:46 (fifteen years ago)

That's prob the correct reading, esp since it lines up pretty well with Nietzsche's "The Birth of Tragedy"

The twist being, almost like Mishima's "Spring Snow," the achievement of tragedy is an artistic triumph. (tho maybe that's not exactly a twist on Nietzsche)

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

idg how the fitting the (imo overused and frequently misinterpreted) "birth of tragedy" dichotomy makes any interpretation of this film the "correct" one?

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 7 January 2011 21:55 (fifteen years ago)

"correct" = i like it.

and because it's a classic take on tragedy that, conscious or not, informs a lot of subsequent art.

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 21:57 (fifteen years ago)

but it's also a question if you wish to see Nina as a victim of her madness (one feminist reading, she's made crazy by the contradictory pressures of femininity) or as a powerful artist in her own right who achieves...uh, destroying herself for art.

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 22:01 (fifteen years ago)

The persistence of megalong ILX threads about technically accomplished, handsome, shallow, facile Hollywood productions, while Wild Grass goes unwatched...

How is the last line otm? Did this mortally wounded, deranged swan really deliver aesthetic perfection? That seems to be the conceit of Vincent Cassel and everyone else's reaction, rather than solely her delusion. I was hoping that her first-act blooper was a sign of less cliched stuff to come -- the performance flaking apart, some real horror -- but no luck.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 January 2011 22:03 (fifteen years ago)

black swan isn't a film about genius learning to let go. it's a film about madness consuming itself.

This is what I was saying I thought was OTM. Notice how it has absolutely fuck-all to do with aesthetic perfection.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 22:06 (fifteen years ago)

what the hell is wild grass

it better not be about grass

Princess TamTam, Friday, 7 January 2011 22:07 (fifteen years ago)

like, if you're going to make some incisive comment about the vacuousness of my opinions, it might help if you actually paid attention to what was being said

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 22:08 (fifteen years ago)

was kinda hoping she'd go GG allin on lincoln center in the last act

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Friday, 7 January 2011 22:09 (fifteen years ago)

well i think that's the rub...all the horror and uneasiness is basically recontained at the ending...unless it's supposed to be recontained FOR nina but alienating to the audience (who only spectates her brilliance and madness), but i dont really get that feeling from it.

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 22:12 (fifteen years ago)

DJP, chill, I'm at the end of a numbing day and misinterpreted your post. I still think the movie self-destructs bcz it requires her to (apparently) triumph onstage and go fatally over the edge.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 January 2011 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

The persistence of megalong ILX threads about technically accomplished, handsome, shallow, facile Hollywood productions, while Wild Grass goes unwatched...

shooting for "single most condescending ILX poster" gold

carles marx (contenderizer), Friday, 7 January 2011 22:16 (fifteen years ago)

Aiming for "depressed" after reading that someone thought this was the pinnacle of cinema 2010.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 January 2011 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

well, "most enjoyable" might not = "pinnacle"

I was hoping that her first-act blooper was a sign of less cliched stuff to come -- the performance flaking apart, some real horror -- but no luck.

― kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, January 7, 2011 2:03 PM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark

agree that this could have been very cool, and probably far more horrifying, but i quite liked the film i got. we can always pretend that things would have been better if they'd been done some other way, but who knows?

carles marx (contenderizer), Friday, 7 January 2011 22:19 (fifteen years ago)

careful with that kind of speculation, because we have the technology to do that now...

Philip Nunez, Friday, 7 January 2011 22:22 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I was about to apologize because I realized what happened; I'm also at the end of a mind-numbing day; sorry about that

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 7 January 2011 22:24 (fifteen years ago)

np, if you're around my age you must be fuct-in-the-head every Friday as well.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 7 January 2011 22:29 (fifteen years ago)

okay, you got me. now that it's been said, i'm haunted by the vision of portman freaking the fuck out and hideously destroying herself, the production and the director in some crazy over-the-top fit of total bugfuck mania. (lol @ edward's suggestion that she smear herself in shit gg-style to complete the transformation.) that probably would have been great, and the film was a bit cowardly for instead giving us a graceful sort of redemption amidst her undoing. grant all that, but still dug it.

carles marx (contenderizer), Friday, 7 January 2011 22:32 (fifteen years ago)

is it really cowardly to NOT fling feces into the audience's eyes

Princess TamTam, Friday, 7 January 2011 22:36 (fifteen years ago)

jackass3D was awesome.

Philip Nunez, Friday, 7 January 2011 22:38 (fifteen years ago)

i could make a joke here about The Fountain...

ryan, Friday, 7 January 2011 22:44 (fifteen years ago)

[feel bad about snipping at morbius. i try not to be that guy...]

carles marx (contenderizer), Friday, 7 January 2011 22:47 (fifteen years ago)

he persistence of megalong ILX threads about technically accomplished, handsome, shallow, facile Hollywood productions, while Wild Grass goes unwatched...

Wild Grass and Black Swan are probably my two favourite films of the year.

Gukbe, Saturday, 8 January 2011 06:17 (fifteen years ago)

was the extreme obviousness of this movie a conceptual coup or something? it felt very deliberate. but while it didn't really interrupt my enjoyment of the film, it made it feel pretty thin and pointless after it was over.

by another name (amateurist), Saturday, 8 January 2011 22:41 (fifteen years ago)

made it better imo

Gukbe, Sunday, 9 January 2011 00:15 (fifteen years ago)

dear mr aronofsky your film was so obvious keep up the good work

i would just like to point out that i have been orange & teal itt (Edward III), Sunday, 9 January 2011 02:56 (fifteen years ago)

i like to encourage people to play to their strengths.

Gukbe, Sunday, 9 January 2011 02:57 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, i'm not really sure i'm making a withering criticism. it's just that the obviousness was, well, unusually obvious. overdetermined. the symbolism was all mutually reinforcing (and manichean). it felt kind of like an "exercise." i mean, i didn't hate it or anything, i guess i kind of just dont... get it? don't get the polarized reactions anyhow.

(though having heard some aronofsky interviews i'm tempted to decide that the guy is just kind of dumb, tout court.)

by another name (amateurist), Sunday, 9 January 2011 03:09 (fifteen years ago)

I think I'm the last person in the universe to see this, lol.

Watching Mila Kunis eating out Natalie Portman while sitting between my two uptight 60 yr old female coworkers was one of more surreal moments of my life.

Loved this. Like a weirdly funny waking nightmare. The thing I came away with after thinking about all the real/not real stuff was that the movie felt kinda meta to me. Like, ithe story s about a new production of Swan Lake but the movie itself ends up being the "new production" of Swan Lake. Right down to the death at the end. Too obvious to really count as my "interpretation" per se...but regardless, Portman was excellent, that bathroom scene you literally see her crumple into a child right before your eyes.

Looking forward to the drag queen parody costumes.

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 14 January 2011 05:44 (fifteen years ago)

VG: it hasnt even come out in Aus yet, youre not! Ive had to studiously avoid this thread for months :(

Stargazey Pi (Trayce), Friday, 14 January 2011 06:18 (fifteen years ago)

Oh boo...when's it open in Aus?

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 14 January 2011 06:27 (fifteen years ago)

Just starting to this weekend. Must go see it.

Stargazey Pi (Trayce), Friday, 14 January 2011 09:17 (fifteen years ago)

loved it. loved portman, loved the direction, loved everything. loved it.

i like lucy (surm), Friday, 14 January 2011 22:03 (fifteen years ago)

Loved this. Like a weirdly funny waking nightmare.

completely OTM

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 14 January 2011 22:08 (fifteen years ago)

ie "sub-De Palma trash"! :)

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 14 January 2011 22:50 (fifteen years ago)

Perfect ratio of smeared makeup vs bad decisions...just the right amount of trash. Though it left me wondering if John Waters got his hands on this one just how much more awesome it could have been. LOL.

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 14 January 2011 23:06 (fifteen years ago)

Actually surprised, especially after reading his essay on Comme des Garcons, that Waters doesn't make a kind of couture thriller like this or Femme Fatale.

like launch the globs and strands (Eazy), Friday, 14 January 2011 23:11 (fifteen years ago)

I would love that.

Actually one of my favorite things about seeing Black Swan was the look on the faces of the two women in front of me after it was over. As soon as the credits came up they gave each other this raised eyebrow look of "Well. That was 'interesting'."
LOLOL.

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 14 January 2011 23:19 (fifteen years ago)

Saw this last night and reading this thread mostly just made me angry/bummed

lamey g. curtis (Stevie D(eux)), Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

y angry/bummed?

Gukbe, Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:41 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, it's very excessive and it's very easy to read it as camp simply because it's both earnest and excessive, but I think that's a total cop-out.

lamey g. curtis (Stevie D(eux)), Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:42 (fifteen years ago)

Everyone's been mentioning The Wrestler and no one seems to have ever seen The Fountain; I don't think anyone who made something as ambitious/earnest as The Fountain would make something like Black Swan for self-aware lulz

lamey g. curtis (Stevie D(eux)), Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

i did not find it excessive or overly campy

i like lucy (surm), Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:43 (fifteen years ago)

i had heard these things going into it, and i did not find it so. i was just more impressed by the suspense, and the taut tension

i like lucy (surm), Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

I didn't think he intentionally made a camp film, but I think there are clearly elements that are supposed to be over the top in a fun way.

polyphonic, Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, I read it as serious and intense and not-campy and this thread sort of makes me feel like a fucking idiot for doing so or something.

lamey g. curtis (Stevie D(eux)), Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

no! i read it as serious and beautiful, and fun

i like lucy (surm), Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

i get the impression that The Fountain is the type of film he really wants to make, but he's not good enough. Black Swan is more his speed, and he should embrace that.

Gukbe, Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

and I do think it works as suspenseful and even tragic within the context of the film itself, which is part of it (and melodrama's) power. i'm no ballet aficionado, but i presume that people don't see The White Swan for it's clever, deep story but rather for the sweeping emotions that the performances that spring from that story deliver. don't see why Black Swan can't work the same way.

Gukbe, Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:47 (fifteen years ago)

I definitely thought it was suspenseful and tense, but I feel the same way about "What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?" and "Hush...Hush, Sweet Charlotte", which both have camp followings.

polyphonic, Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:51 (fifteen years ago)

Like if we are seriously at the point where we are approaching this as an artifact of camp, will someone please explain to me how a film could be ambitious and OTT and super-intense w/o being campy, or is simply not allowed to happen?

lamey g. curtis (Stevie D(eux)), Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:51 (fifteen years ago)

i was like shuddering during the performance at the end

i like lucy (surm), Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:51 (fifteen years ago)

the sound effex + her movement

i like lucy (surm), Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

She is psychotic; she sees and experiences psychotic things. Is this just automatically funny now?

lamey g. curtis (Stevie D(eux)), Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

The performance at the end was incredible, I agree.

polyphonic, Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:53 (fifteen years ago)

Don't at all get the regard with which Portman is held. She's a big drip in this movie: monotonous and inflexible.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:57 (fifteen years ago)

(which is what the director wanted, obviously)

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 15 January 2011 20:57 (fifteen years ago)

She is psychotic; she sees and experiences psychotic things. Is this just automatically funny now?

― lamey g. curtis (Stevie D(eux)), Saturday, January 15, 2011 12:52 PM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark

i thought black swan delivered its story, characters and psychological thrills very directly. when it wanted to be scary, it was. when it wanted to be "intense", it was - and sad, funny, suspenseful, etc. i.e., aronofsky seemed in control of the effects he was generating, at least on the surface level. but the film also struck me as lurid, feverish and almost absurdly overstated. that's not a complaint. those are some of the qualities that i love best in cinema, but films exhibiting them do often teeter on the edge of camp. i loved almost every moment of black swan, but a great deal of my delight came from the grand absurdity of it all. depalma's playful use of the ludicrous seems very self-aware, but i'm not so sure about aronofsky on that level. not sure it matters, either. i don't think there's any wrong or right way to enjoy a film.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Saturday, 15 January 2011 21:17 (fifteen years ago)

i guess i kinda disagree that ott has to equal camp here. i do think it was ott, but i didn't really get 'camp' after 2 viewings.

tehresa, Saturday, 15 January 2011 21:30 (fifteen years ago)

She's a big drip in this movie: monotonous and inflexible.

Biggest problem with this movie is that she starts out fragile and nuts and only grows more so. I liked it all the same, but I kept wondering what Cronenberg of Polanski would have done with the material (ignoring the fact that they both sort of have made this movie already, once or twice). Also, is it just me, or is the ending oddly similar to that of "The Wrestler?"

Re: camp, there are definitely moments in this that are supposed to be funny - like the guy in the monster suit mumbling "hey" - which bump up awkwardly against moments that inspire nervous laughter, but the conflation/confusion of the two is partly what I found so appealing. Don't know whether it's supposed to be funny that every single time Portman turns around and sees something or someone that surprises her, there's this big dramatic orchestral cue, tho.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 16 January 2011 00:05 (fifteen years ago)

BTW, overheated/OTT is sort of ballet's metier, no? It can be subtle, and beautiful, and moving, but it's still people in costumes leaping around, telling small stories with oversized movements.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 16 January 2011 00:06 (fifteen years ago)

Also, it's another movie where going to a dance club seems like entering the pits of hell. Who would actually want to go to these horrible clubs?

― Josefa, Wednesday, 22 December 2010 03:40 (3 weeks ago) Bookmark

OTM. i think 'City Of God' was the last film with an in-any-way-fun looking clubbing scene in a film. also would a club with a sound system that sounded like it cost a million bucks really have toilets that looked worse than CBGB in the 70s? *i think not*.

anyway loved this pretty much. way better than The Wrestler or Requiem.. imo. Babs Hershey did my head in a bit mind.

piscesx, Sunday, 16 January 2011 00:10 (fifteen years ago)

also would a club with a sound system that sounded like it cost a million bucks really have toilets that looked worse than CBGB in the 70s? *i think not*.

clearly you have not been to new york?

tehresa, Sunday, 16 January 2011 00:12 (fifteen years ago)

Lol otm

VegemiteGrrrl, Sunday, 16 January 2011 00:17 (fifteen years ago)

I won't pretend to understand critics groups and the way films and actors acquire "momentum," but I haven't read a single review that explains why Portman deserves year-end kudos.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 16 January 2011 00:20 (fifteen years ago)

Bc she grew feathers and turned into a swan, jeez do I have to spell it out

VegemiteGrrrl, Sunday, 16 January 2011 00:24 (fifteen years ago)

That's some method shit right there

Young Guns aside, the western is not my favorite genre. (latebloomer), Sunday, 16 January 2011 00:26 (fifteen years ago)

Nice beak.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 16 January 2011 00:27 (fifteen years ago)

http://johnnywestmusic.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/evil-rubber-ducky.jpg?w=200&h=200

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 16 January 2011 00:34 (fifteen years ago)

if Mila Kunis eats you out on film, automatic Oscar nod IMO

boots get knocked from here to czechoslovakier (milo z), Sunday, 16 January 2011 00:35 (fifteen years ago)

mm i have been to New York! only went to a couple of clubs mind.

piscesx, Sunday, 16 January 2011 00:37 (fifteen years ago)

Barbara Hershey was terrifying. The birthday cake /garbage can scene almost gave me a sympathy panic attack

VegemiteGrrrl, Sunday, 16 January 2011 00:39 (fifteen years ago)

I missed the scene in Hannah and Her Sisters in which Barbara Hershey furiously trims Michael Caine's toenails.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 16 January 2011 00:39 (fifteen years ago)

Ugh the toenails. TERRFIYING.

VegemiteGrrrl, Sunday, 16 January 2011 00:40 (fifteen years ago)

srsly of the years i lived in ny one thing i came to expect was disgusting bathrooms, regardless of how nice the rest of the venue.

tehresa, Sunday, 16 January 2011 00:43 (fifteen years ago)

Lemme just say modern bootleggers work fast! Looking forward to watching this later.

Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 16 January 2011 02:00 (fifteen years ago)

Don't at all get the regard with which Portman is held. She's a big drip in this movie: monotonous and inflexible.

I wouldn't go so far as to say that she's a drip, but I wasn't necessarily impressed with her chops. I mean, she's pretty good at doing what the role calls for, but it's not a role that requires a lot of range, just proper amounts of intensity and heightening.

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Sunday, 16 January 2011 02:08 (fifteen years ago)

(Don't mean to sound like Dr. Morbius, but Michelle Williams should be getting the kudos NatPo is.)

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Sunday, 16 January 2011 02:10 (fifteen years ago)

"if Mila Kunis eats you out on film, automatic Oscar nod IMO"

"Lemme just say modern bootleggers work fast! Looking forward to watching this later."

the version i saw either didn't have this scene in or I forgot it. I'm wondering if the chinese streaming site has a built-in de-campifier. (BTW they also stream buffalo 66 and brown bunny for no explicable reason.)

Philip Nunez, Sunday, 16 January 2011 03:24 (fifteen years ago)

You wouldn't forget it.

VegemiteGrrrl, Sunday, 16 January 2011 03:28 (fifteen years ago)

there's a version going around *without* the eating out scene in it?!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcNLEwf2pOw

piscesx, Sunday, 16 January 2011 03:38 (fifteen years ago)

Great performances, great looking, great sound, all marred by terrible terrible script

O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Sunday, 16 January 2011 03:41 (fifteen years ago)

expand pls?

call all destroyer, Sunday, 16 January 2011 03:44 (fifteen years ago)

Too many feathers, or not enough?

VegemiteGrrrl, Sunday, 16 January 2011 03:44 (fifteen years ago)

I just got out of the movie so I need s little bit of time to digest it, but I will say that looking up the writers on imdb and finding out that the only other credit one of them has is "man of the house", the keitel vehicle where a us Marshall has to guard a group of cheerleaders was painfully unsurprising

O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Sunday, 16 January 2011 03:47 (fifteen years ago)

"man of the house", the keitel vehicle where a us Marshall has to guard a group of cheerleaders was painfully unsurprising

this sounds great

johnny crunch, Sunday, 16 January 2011 03:51 (fifteen years ago)

Keitel? I thought that was Tommy Lee Jones?

some hills are never seen (Drugs A. Money), Sunday, 16 January 2011 03:59 (fifteen years ago)

Oh yeah, yer right

O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Sunday, 16 January 2011 04:06 (fifteen years ago)

I feel so...smart?

some hills are never seen (Drugs A. Money), Sunday, 16 January 2011 04:08 (fifteen years ago)

Wrong wrinkly old dude

O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Sunday, 16 January 2011 04:08 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.vh1.com/video/play.jhtml?id=1655891

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 16 January 2011 08:03 (fifteen years ago)

let's try that again:

http://www.vh1.com/video/misc/612845/jackass-spoofs-black-swan.jhtml#id=1655891

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 16 January 2011 08:06 (fifteen years ago)

I'm not sure the script was bad, per se - it's certainly a great premise. But I did consider how much more effective (though it is certainly effective enough) the movie might have been without the cracked domineering mother (maybe make her a nosy landlord or something?), and if most of the movie were dialogue-free, since the dialogue is 90% "Be the swan! Let yourself go! I need to see the black swan! Lose control!" (the other 10% is telling Nina to feel herself up, or trying to feel her up). I suppose the movie needed the mother and Winona to fill (though not flesh, alas) the film out a bit, but they could have spent those pages giving us a "before" shot of Nina's life, so we could maybe see her slowly go nuts.

Coincidence, btw, that Catherine Deneuve's character in "Repulsion" is ... a manicurist? I'd like to think it's a subtle homage.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 16 January 2011 13:33 (fifteen years ago)

Given ILX's love for The Shining, seeing protagonists be nuts from the start seems preferred.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 16 January 2011 13:54 (fifteen years ago)

portman was very solid, and her representation of fear was good.

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

somebody said "direct" above and that is definitely a key word here. this movie was VERY direct, and it worked well.

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 16:55 (fifteen years ago)

I mean, I read it as serious and intense and not-campy and this thread sort of makes me feel like a fucking idiot for doing so or something.

Well that's not quite the right reaction to have to this thread, IMO; it's more that people are testing camp and melodrama as if they're the same thing when they aren't.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:01 (fifteen years ago)

^^^this

tehresa, Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:03 (fifteen years ago)

my sister in law was talking last night and she said she found it campy and i just flat out said that i didn't -- like i honestly don't even see that part of it, really. camp is such an umbrella descriptor now. next time i have a conversation with someone about "camp" i want them to explain to me what they actually think it is.

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:06 (fifteen years ago)

Also I think seeing more of Nina's life pre-movie would have ruined the story, since it would have been more explicit about the bulimia and self-harming and obsessive kleptomania and would have sucked the tiny vestige of subtlety that made the grand sweeps of her transformation into a rampaging ball of violence interesting.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:07 (fifteen years ago)

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51KHA577HNL.jpg

tehresa, Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

xp agreed 100% i didn't need more detail

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

lol teh

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:08 (fifteen years ago)

"funny touching and VITAL"

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

this was my friend's response when i told him that some ppl seem to think it's campy

Ryan: campy?
how so?

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

<3 him

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

Ryan: no, I wouldn't say campy
not at all

me: interesting
why not?
(i wouldn't either)

Ryan: well, camp is the ironic appreciation of something that would otherwise be seen as being corny
But purposely so

me: right

Ryan: Now, if people are calling it corny, then that's their own opinion

me: yes

Ryan: I didn't really see it that way

me: me either

Ryan: I guess you could look at the sort of over-the-top parts

me: obvious, maybe
well sure
but thrillers are full of over-the-top parts
that's like, their thing

Ryan: and be like "woah, little too much there"
but it was artfully done

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:19 (fifteen years ago)

Ryan: it was like a ballet
which I think was probably the point
and I guess if you're watching a ballet being like "how cornball" then that's all you're going to see

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:21 (fifteen years ago)

feel like a lot of ppl are talking past each other w/r/t the camp ott melodrama thing

max, Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:29 (fifteen years ago)

obv its not "camp" like susan sontag "camp" but i think we can all agree its super ott? without that being a value judgment necc?

max, Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:30 (fifteen years ago)

no, that's what i was thinking after i saw it, actually -- i didn't find it over the top

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:33 (fifteen years ago)

that was like my main reaction. i just found it fun.

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:33 (fifteen years ago)

you didnt find it over the top?????? surm she turns into a fucking swan

max, Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:35 (fifteen years ago)

I don't find Videodrome over the top and he pulls a flesh gun out of his stomach so

Gukbe, Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

.................................................................................

max, Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

where is "the top" for you guys

max, Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:36 (fifteen years ago)

you didnt find it over the top?????? surm she turns into a fucking swan

yep, no, don't get why that means it's over the top

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:37 (fifteen years ago)

it's a cool premise, and an intense one, but why does that have to be dubbed "ott"

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:37 (fifteen years ago)

not sure.

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:37 (fifteen years ago)

also she didn't actually turn into a swan.

Gukbe, Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:38 (fifteen years ago)

the way some ppl were talking about it i thought that part of it was going to be way more graphic than it was

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:38 (fifteen years ago)

it was like a fairytale - i can imagine reading this as a short story

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:40 (fifteen years ago)

I guess I define "over the top" as something that goes beyond the diegesis already established. She turns into a swan in her mind briefly while that is definitely BIG I don't think it's too far removed from the way the movie had been building, especially in regards to horror techniques i.e. musical stabs and people jumping out etc

Gukbe, Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

yea like the production technique for that part of the story was actually very NOT over the top

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

all right yall whatever

max, Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:41 (fifteen years ago)

also she didn't actually turn into a swan.
what i was gonna say! if a hallucination wasn't over the top, i'd be kind of concerned...

tehresa, Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:42 (fifteen years ago)

when i saw Inception i thought man i wish they could have made a full length movie that had the same feel of those brief scenes in the hotel with Cobb and Mal, but all the way through. those parts in the hotel at night were bloody and full on and nightmarish and hysterical and it was like a 15 minute chunk of a completely brilliant other film. so this film is pretty much what i had in mind!

i see that it's currently at number 51 in the top films of all time list on IMDB. i know those cats are crazy and all but that's still quite rare for a non-action/ comic book type film isn't it?

piscesx, Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:46 (fifteen years ago)

Hot lesbionic action almost as good as giant robots and explosions.

EZ Snappin, Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:47 (fifteen years ago)

i guess the thing that i liked about it most was that not for a SECOND did i have to question why i was sitting in that theater

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

(i tend to have a finicky attention span when it comes to movies)

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:49 (fifteen years ago)

To clarify my terrible script thing upthread, it's 90% the incredibly bad dialogue, but also there are a couple points where it really doesn't hang together and "oh shit she crazy" is telegraphed way too early.

As for the idea that this movie was camp or even ott I just don't get it at all - coming from the req for a dream dude this is basically a subtle costume drama

O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:55 (fifteen years ago)

"still quite rare for a non-action/ comic book type film isn't it?"

black swan was a more faithful adaptation of dark phoenix saga than xmen iii.

Philip Nunez, Sunday, 16 January 2011 17:57 (fifteen years ago)

x-post I didn't need more backstory, but it would have made it a better movie, I think. In some ways, given the lack of an establishing stability, I sort of wish it went even more over the top. Like, that she actually turned into a swan and then spontaneously combusted or something, to rapturous applause.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

the end was perfect cinema.

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:09 (fifteen years ago)

geniunely baffled by the idea that this was like... subtle? or restrained? i mean everything that happens in this movie is huge and grotesque and... over the top

max, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:11 (fifteen years ago)

Compared to Pi or Requiem, yeah, this felt pretty restrained, but that may be a facet of the gritty documentary approach.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:13 (fifteen years ago)

pi and requiem are pretty high bars for "over the top"

max, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:14 (fifteen years ago)

"incredibly bad dialogue" is one i haven't heard before re: this

call all destroyer, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:15 (fifteen years ago)

geniunely baffled by the idea that this was like... subtle? or restrained? i mean everything that happens in this movie is huge and grotesque and... over the top

um, she danced, and took E, and turned into a swan. it wasn't like 2 fast 2 furious ffs.

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:15 (fifteen years ago)

huge yes, grotesque no, ott no...

Having a character cut his own tongue off as penance is ott; a human centipede is ott; "ass to ass" is ott. This didn't get there. Enjoyed it btw.

xposts

earnest goes to camp, ironic goes to ilm (pixel farmer), Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:15 (fifteen years ago)

yea i didn't even have to think about the dialogue, which is a good sign.

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:16 (fifteen years ago)

script seemed fine to me. nothing special but didnt bug me at all.

max, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:16 (fifteen years ago)

I wonder how jason statham would have tackled the 'nina' role.

Philip Nunez, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:17 (fifteen years ago)

dialogue was functional, not a "dialogue" movie iirc

call all destroyer, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

um, she danced, and took E, and turned into a swan. it wasn't like 2 fast 2 furious ffs.

― i like lucy (surm), Sunday, January 16, 2011 1:15 PM (38 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah, she danced, she took e, the pictures laughed at her, she stabbed someone in the face, stabbed someon i the chest, and then hallucinated that she was turning into a swan and died. nothing over the top about that! i thought it was a merchant ivory movie actually

max, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

i guess i am starting to understand the "this didn't go far enough" crowd--you all watch ridiculous insane shit all the time i gather?

call all destroyer, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:19 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, she danced, she took e, the pictures laughed at her, she stabbed someone in the face, stabbed someon i the chest, and then hallucinated that she was turning into a swan and died. nothing over the top about that! i thought it was a merchant ivory movie actually

yeahh.... it was a thriller. that's like, what happens. didn't seem especially forced or aggressive at all.

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

did she actually die at the end? it seemed like the door was open for sequels

Philip Nunez, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

dogg what thrillers are you watching that are like this

max, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

black swan 2: none more black

max, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:20 (fifteen years ago)

are you seriously disputing the fact that thrillers typically involve a lot of crazy shit?

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

like ... what?

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:21 (fifteen years ago)

hope Neveldine/Taylor take up the reigns for the sequel.

Gukbe, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:27 (fifteen years ago)

im disputing the idea that "most thrillers" reach the same level of "crazy shit" that black swan does

max, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

i think plenty of thrillers reach those heights and beyond, maxers

and actually? merchant ivory films are WAY fucking over the top

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:32 (fifteen years ago)

like i said upthread "whatever" u guys are nuts

max, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:34 (fifteen years ago)

http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/files/2008/05/260px-khaaaaan.jpg
SWAAAAAAAAN!

Philip Nunez, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:35 (fifteen years ago)

just for once i'd like to see a movie with an E experience that was close to the real thing. i mean.. no way on earth you get up and do 10 hours *ballet* the morning after. getting to the corner shop and back was hard enough back in the day.

piscesx, Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:40 (fifteen years ago)

I don't know the ins and outs of film-crit, but maybe it's worth differentiating between Nina's actions (sure, ok, over the top) and Aronofsky's film (definitely not).

earnest goes to camp, ironic goes to ilm (pixel farmer), Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:45 (fifteen years ago)

2 Black 2 Swan

like launch the globs and strands (Eazy), Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:48 (fifteen years ago)

RE: the whole "camp" conversation, I would totally understand if someone called "Magnolia" or "The Hours" campy because I thought both were chock-full of overwrought, amateurish performances with a ton of fake emotion and random events that seemed to serve zero purpose with regards to the film's story or the interactions between the characters.

For me, camp involves a distinct, often intentional sense of "couldn't give a shit" re: displaying a genuine emotion, whereas melodrama is about exaggerating an emotion to the point where it pushes the boundary of credulity; a melodramatic reaction is a genuine one but is all out of proportion to the event/action that sparked it, whereas a campy reaction is a completely false, manufactured reaction to an event. The only way I can conceive of reading this movie as "campy" is if it completely failed to make you think the reactions Nina was having as she turned into a raging monster were genuine.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Sunday, 16 January 2011 20:52 (fifteen years ago)

this movie would have been great if it was 15 mins long

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Sunday, 16 January 2011 20:55 (fifteen years ago)

yea was definitely thinking about "the hours" -- now THAT is camp (tho i disagree with the other stuff you said about it)

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 21:00 (fifteen years ago)

I'm also not sure how the dialogue in this movie was bad (repetitive, yes)

Indolence Mission (DJP), Sunday, 16 January 2011 21:05 (fifteen years ago)

Well, I suppose its repetition is partly what makes it "bad," and also that it frequently spells out what it doesn't necessarily need to spell out. But a) this is mostly through Cassel's character and b) not nearly as horrible a screenwriting transgression as many similar films can be accused of. In fact, I'm largely impressed Aronofsky left so many things unexplained (such as what were visions, what were not, whether Cassel was truly making moves or simply trying to get the best performance, whether Mila was really out to get her, even whether she lives or not).

Again, think this all might have been slightly more effective without the crazed mom. It needs to be the isolation and obsession with the work that drives Nina nuts, not her crazy stage mom's obsession with her obsession. Was thinking last night that, like "The Social Network," this could have used a break-up scene at the beginning, to show Nina willing to give things up for her career, and to give her ambition a little more, I dunno, autonomy.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 16 January 2011 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

(Also, Winona's character totally pointless. Per Denby's review, whose phrase "luridly beautiful farrago" perfectly sums it up, "Freud said that meeting one’s doppelgänger in life or in dreams produces sensations of the uncanny, but isn’t one double enough?").

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 16 January 2011 21:16 (fifteen years ago)

think this all might have been slightly more effective without the crazed mom

disagree; the mom is necessary inasmuch as their relationship is a way to telegraph nina's psychosis & sexual dysfunction early on.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Sunday, 16 January 2011 21:41 (fifteen years ago)

i haven't wanted to see a movie again like this since i saw volver

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

xpost Yeah I mean her interaction with her mother saves half a movie's worth of exposition. We know more abt her character bc of her interactions with Hershey.

VegemiteGrrrl, Sunday, 16 January 2011 21:48 (fifteen years ago)

ugh hershey was creepy

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 21:49 (fifteen years ago)

I saw this over the weekend. I thought Portman probably deserves the hype, at least wrt other big profile movies from this year. My biggest complaint tho about the film was that the thematic plot really moves nowhere. It starts off as "Portman is afraid of something -- maybe she is becoming insane" and then just hits that same note over and over again. I can't really blame Portman for this (it's def a writing issue), but it was hard to not get bored. By the time we got to the seventh "is she hurting herself again?" scene I was http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_leftkrHJkw1qf8yek.gif.

Mordy, Sunday, 16 January 2011 21:50 (fifteen years ago)

i just - the look on portman's face when she is doing the black swan at the end

that look of focus

is perfect

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 21:51 (fifteen years ago)

the mom is necessary inasmuch as their relationship is a way to telegraph nina's psychosis & sexual dysfunction early on.

Yeah, this really needed telegraphing.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 16 January 2011 22:03 (fifteen years ago)

hershey is worth it just for portman's "I'M THE SWAN QUEEN" retort to her -- her line delivery there perfectly showcased the balance of insecurity and narcissism that she toted til the end

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 22:11 (fifteen years ago)

I totally thought she was going to bust out with "I'M The SWAN QUEEN, BITCH!"

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 16 January 2011 22:15 (fifteen years ago)

Moray hitting the plot problems dead on for me right there

O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Sunday, 16 January 2011 22:15 (fifteen years ago)

Aggghhh iPhone eh you know who I'm talking about

O_o-O_0-o_O (jjjusten), Sunday, 16 January 2011 22:16 (fifteen years ago)

I totally thought she was going to bust out with "I'M The SWAN QUEEN, BITCH!"

― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, January 16, 2011 10:15 PM (1 minute ago) Bookmark

omg i know i felt it coming

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 22:17 (fifteen years ago)

i like how "moray" makes "mordy" sound like some kind of philosoph

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 22:21 (fifteen years ago)

eh, i'll say again that this movie really exploits a lot of common tropes with regard to madness, even to the point of cliche; the overly intimate relationship with the mom plays to the idea that mental illness / sexual dysfunction ultimately stems from family relationships. it's not really essential to the plot per se but is essential for communicating nina's character to a mass audience in the first 5 minutes of the film.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Sunday, 16 January 2011 22:45 (fifteen years ago)

it exploits a lot of tropes from madness and ballet/performing art movies (pressure to succeed, getting old, backstage rivalry) to great effect imo. i think the use of those clichés works in the film's favour, though i can completely understand somebody seeing the same thing and having the opposite response.

Gukbe, Sunday, 16 January 2011 22:50 (fifteen years ago)

eh, i'll say again that this movie really exploits a lot of common tropes with regard to madness, even to the point of cliche; the overly intimate relationship with the mom plays to the idea that mental illness / sexual dysfunction ultimately stems from family relationships. it's not really essential to the plot per se but is essential for communicating nina's character to a mass audience in the first 5 minutes of the film.

Exactly. Which is why this film is almost Victorian in its interest in female stereotypes. Fifty years after The Red Shoes you'd think that male directors would more shrewdly represent female workaholics -- not to mention girls who like sex.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 16 January 2011 23:00 (fifteen years ago)

The whole point is that the mom seems crazy but is operating off of info (Portman is crazy from the jump) that is communicated via inference at the beginning of the movie and isn't made more explicit until much later in the film.

I don't think taking away the movie's only subtlety would make it any better.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Sunday, 16 January 2011 23:19 (fifteen years ago)

what was it exactly that was not shrewd about the film's depiction of horny female workaholics, alfred?

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 23:20 (fifteen years ago)

just out of curiosity

mila kunis is pretty btw

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 23:22 (fifteen years ago)

The female workaholic is ALSO sexually repressed AND has mommy issues? Man. Too much neuroses for any 21st century child-woman to endure, even if she's played by Portman.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 16 January 2011 23:27 (fifteen years ago)

it is a storybook setup of a narrative, but i think it was intended to be

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 23:28 (fifteen years ago)

ballet is similar to a fable at times

i like lucy (surm), Sunday, 16 January 2011 23:29 (fifteen years ago)

I remember fairy tales before Freud.

Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 16 January 2011 23:51 (fifteen years ago)

i hear u

i like lucy (surm), Monday, 17 January 2011 00:20 (fifteen years ago)

he whole point is that the mom seems crazy but is operating off of info (Portman is crazy from the jump) that is communicated via inference at the beginning of the movie and isn't made more explicit until much later in the film.

Wait, are you saying the mom was subtle? She was one of the most OTT things about this! In fact, from the start I thought we were in for "Carrie" redux, and was pleasantly surprised it didn't go there. The revelation of the mom's craziness - and Winona's as well, for that matter - is only minimally more nuanced than Nina's "descent" into madness.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 January 2011 01:44 (fifteen years ago)

I am saying that the depiction of Nina as someone who is already insane is subtle and the mom seems overbearing and wrong until the movie makes you realize that Nina lost her shit way before the movie started, transforming the mom's overbearing controlling act into a semi-impotent call of concern.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Monday, 17 January 2011 02:27 (fifteen years ago)

in this long thread has anyone talked about how skinny Portman looked in the film and to what extent we can separate her dedication to her craft to her character's?

Mordy, Monday, 17 January 2011 02:28 (fifteen years ago)

from*, not to

Mordy, Monday, 17 January 2011 02:29 (fifteen years ago)

you can't, basically

ballet dancers are emaciated because you can't have normal weight on your body and do what they are asked to do

Indolence Mission (DJP), Monday, 17 January 2011 02:36 (fifteen years ago)

i was like shuddering during the performance at the end

― i like lucy (surm), Saturday, January 15, 2011 3:51 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

the sound effex + her movement

― i like lucy (surm), Saturday, January 15, 2011 3:52 PM (2 days ago) Bookmark

otm, gave me chills

dogg what thrillers are you watching that are like this

― max, Sunday, January 16, 2011 1:20 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

im disputing the idea that "most thrillers" reach the same level of "crazy shit" that black swan does

― max, Sunday, January 16, 2011 1:32 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

eh i think you're overselling it now, this fits p neatly in with a long tradition of mindfuck thrillers

Princess TamTam, Monday, 17 January 2011 09:44 (fifteen years ago)

Losing/gaining weight for a role = Oscar nod (unless you're Christian Bale and do it every fucking time). Though it blows my mind that Portman had any extra weight to lose.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 January 2011 13:33 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, I remember thinking she looked scary skinny in Hotel Chevalier.

Zsa Zsa Gay Bar (jaymc), Monday, 17 January 2011 13:50 (fifteen years ago)

Tbh she looked pretty good last night with the baby weight.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 17 January 2011 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

yeah! she did

i like lucy (surm), Monday, 17 January 2011 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

natalie portman having a baby makes me feel pretty fuckin old

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Monday, 17 January 2011 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

Guys, she had a baby a long time ago, when her wicked beau abandoned her pregnant ass at a Wal-Mart, remember? (Am I the only one who had to sit through that?)

Stop Non-Erotic Cabaret (Abbbottt), Monday, 17 January 2011 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

It was that movie + "I must return to Naboo" that started a personal 10-year anti-Portman phase that is only now ending.

Stop Non-Erotic Cabaret (Abbbottt), Monday, 17 January 2011 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha i was just thinking about that movie the other day

Princess TamTam, Monday, 17 January 2011 16:48 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah, Episode 2 did a lot of damage to my Natalie love at the time, but I still <3 her. My favorite Portman movie moment ever is in Episode 2 when they are tied up in the arena and that creature thing swats at her with a claw that just happens to perfectly rip her shirt to completely reveal her midriff. Honestly thinking Your Highness will be even better though.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 17 January 2011 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

I'm really excited for Your Highness

Mordy, Monday, 17 January 2011 17:02 (fifteen years ago)

I had no idea she was pregnant until just now. Weird.

ENBB, Monday, 17 January 2011 17:16 (fifteen years ago)

I remember that one too Abbs.

ENBB, Monday, 17 January 2011 17:16 (fifteen years ago)

just saw this today. loved the claustrophobic feel that came from every shot in the theatre, subway, mom's house & tiny bar. also, holy fuck when did barbara hershey turn into robert blake in lost highway?

Darin, Tuesday, 18 January 2011 06:34 (fifteen years ago)

how to make an american puke

goole, Tuesday, 18 January 2011 06:40 (fifteen years ago)

I <3 Where The Heart Is, Natalie Portman shoots a Rolleiflex in it and apparently someone in the cast actually knew how to use one.

boots get knocked from here to czechoslovakier (milo z), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 06:50 (fifteen years ago)

er, not cast, crew

boots get knocked from here to czechoslovakier (milo z), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 06:50 (fifteen years ago)

dude i know how to use a rolle and i'm just some fuckin guy

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 18 January 2011 10:40 (fifteen years ago)

Just saw this today, liked it a lot. Was it just the print at my cinema or was this film really, really grainy?

At the start all the constant close-ups and shaky-cam work bothered me, but either Aronofsky backed off from that a bit later on in the film, or I just got used to it. Natalie Portman is phenomenal in this, btw. Kunis is cute.

you got your TV, you got your dinner, you got your TV dinner (DavidM), Friday, 21 January 2011 18:00 (fifteen years ago)

Was it just the print at my cinema or was this film really, really grainy?

shit yeah! i was gonna mention that and totally forgot. (totally.) super-grainy picture seemed at odds with the movie's fastidious look and even its themes. got used to it though.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Friday, 21 January 2011 18:52 (fifteen years ago)

inland empire

children of the church planters (Edward III), Friday, 21 January 2011 18:54 (fifteen years ago)

it was shot on 16mm

David Warner (Princess TamTam), Friday, 21 January 2011 18:55 (fifteen years ago)

and video

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 21 January 2011 19:02 (fifteen years ago)

subway scenes shot w/ consumer DSLR

children of the church planters (Edward III), Friday, 21 January 2011 19:02 (fifteen years ago)

At the start all the constant close-ups and shaky-cam work bothered me, but either Aronofsky backed off from that a bit later on in the film, or I just got used to it.

more subway scenes in the beginning iirc so probably the former

children of the church planters (Edward III), Friday, 21 January 2011 19:04 (fifteen years ago)

grain was very noticeable on the subway, but also in the outdoor scenes and even in the dance studio. was initially distracting, and i wondered whether it might be a conscious nod to the film's 70s precedents.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Friday, 21 January 2011 19:06 (fifteen years ago)

good interview w/ the DP here

http://www.alexandrosmaragos.com/2010/12/black-swan-canon-7d.html

children of the church planters (Edward III), Friday, 21 January 2011 19:15 (fifteen years ago)

Thanks for that cool link, Edward!

David Warner (Princess TamTam), Friday, 21 January 2011 19:16 (fifteen years ago)

you are welcome

anybody wondering why they felt seasick during the first half, article contains answer

http://img809.imageshack.us/img809/790/blackswancanon7d.png

children of the church planters (Edward III), Friday, 21 January 2011 19:21 (fifteen years ago)

I loved the subway scenes.

‎\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Friday, 21 January 2011 19:23 (fifteen years ago)

Old man in audience, during subway scene where old man starts coming on to Portman: "That's me!"
Old man in audience after old man onscreen starts fondling himself: "That's not me."

^ still makes me lol

children of the church planters (Edward III), Friday, 21 January 2011 19:25 (fifteen years ago)

hahaha

‎\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Friday, 21 January 2011 19:25 (fifteen years ago)

think I missed that the first time it was posted

‎\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Friday, 21 January 2011 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

interview has a good answer to the grain question:

I think 16mm creates interesting texture, especially if you expose it correctly. Harris Savides [ASC] is probably the master of it; he’s always pushing the negative so you can see it in a perfect way. One of my goals was to show the grain in a way that was craftsmanlike. I didn’t want it to look underexposed; I wanted it to look like it was a choice, and I think that comes across.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Friday, 21 January 2011 19:26 (fifteen years ago)

That DP, Libatique, has done a ton of stuff. Watched a behind the scenes on Iron Man 2 dvd, dude is pretty badass

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 21 January 2011 19:48 (fifteen years ago)

this seasick feeling thing keeps cropping up. Irrverisble had it and i recall feeling genuinely nauseous during Rcahel Getting Married then reading it had been shot that way on purpose.
also: http://www.ropeofsilicon.com/article/caution-this-movie-may-cause-motion-sickness

piscesx, Friday, 21 January 2011 19:51 (fifteen years ago)

also this: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/8272497/3D-films-TV-and-video-games-cause-nausea-and-headaches.html

children of the church planters (Edward III), Friday, 21 January 2011 20:02 (fifteen years ago)

coming soon to a theater near you, sick bags in seat pockets like airplanes

children of the church planters (Edward III), Friday, 21 January 2011 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

YOGI-BEAR 5 NOW IN VOMIT-FREE 3D

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 21 January 2011 20:07 (fifteen years ago)

impossible

children of the church planters (Edward III), Friday, 21 January 2011 20:08 (fifteen years ago)

lol yeah probably picked a bad movie for the example

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 21 January 2011 20:09 (fifteen years ago)

loved this. definitely like how it included the audience in the hallucinations, how the 'world' the movie is presented in never feels fully real and schizophrenic, as in Nina's POV. Mila Kunis was wau. really impressed with how she's grown from lil Jackie on 70s show.

despite me being exhausted kept my attention throughout. and well the lezbo scene ,well....nuff...said.

i love tampon spaceship (San Te), Saturday, 22 January 2011 01:38 (fifteen years ago)

http://i55.tinypic.com/egve5z.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8-R8jC66sA

cozen, Saturday, 22 January 2011 13:52 (fifteen years ago)

oh no charles durning look out!

in my room, redefining the meaning of black crowes (Edward III), Saturday, 22 January 2011 14:50 (fifteen years ago)

That poster is pretty awesome.

A chilling early scene has Claire receiving a bouquet of black flowers with a note: "Welcome back Natalie". This refers to the 1891 ballerina named Natalie Horvath, but today gives off an eerie note with the coincidence of actress Portman's first name some 22 years later in such a similar role.

‎\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Saturday, 22 January 2011 14:53 (fifteen years ago)

does anyone know if you can get those black swan posters anywhere?

cozen, Saturday, 22 January 2011 14:54 (fifteen years ago)

www.google.com

found them

cozen, Saturday, 22 January 2011 14:55 (fifteen years ago)

good work guy

‎\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Saturday, 22 January 2011 14:57 (fifteen years ago)

great find on etoile czn!

Nhex, Saturday, 22 January 2011 17:20 (fifteen years ago)

Loved this. I went expecting to be disappointed, but the way it continually ratcheted up the tension (even as you know essentially what's going to happen) was amazing, and I think the moments of camp/humor/whatever that people are referring to were key in that.

Also, never thought Portman could act her way out of a paper bag before, but she gave an incredible performance.

boots get knocked from here to czechoslovakier (milo z), Tuesday, 25 January 2011 08:38 (fifteen years ago)

991 messages? Blimey....

My short message, not itching to see this film, seen it in real-life too often.

Not all aspects, obv, but the arena..

Mark G, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 09:20 (fifteen years ago)

ok, so more than anything this reminded me of a hysterical remake of haneke's the piano teacher - ie sexually frustrated, self-harming woman involved in 'high art', w/ a domineering mother, who ends up stabbing herself

Ward Fowler, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 10:58 (fifteen years ago)

^ the piano teacher was the first thing I thought of, glad someone else made the connection too

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 25 January 2011 12:16 (fifteen years ago)

loved this. though i doubt it will win anything at the oscars except *maybe* get portman a statuette just cos of all the body horror and lesbian stuff. dont know which posters you guys are talking about but the ones being used in all the press and on the underground are pretty boring - just big head shots of portman.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 25 January 2011 13:09 (fifteen years ago)

also, the graininess was great.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 25 January 2011 13:10 (fifteen years ago)

i think the posters are itt if you open the whole thing

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 25 January 2011 14:07 (fifteen years ago)

admittedly, nowhere as crappy as haneke's the piano teacher

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 25 January 2011 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

Hey, this is pleasingly nuts, I enjoyed it way more than I thought I might! It walks a real tightrope tonally, with a lesser director it could well have been total nonsense. But Aronofsky really pulls it off.

Rejoice that you weren't eaten (chap), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 02:20 (fifteen years ago)

Also not much of a Portman fan generally, but she sold a tricky role well.

Rejoice that you weren't eaten (chap), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 02:20 (fifteen years ago)

Finally got around to watching this and despite having all the elements in place it was strangely uninvolving and occasionally tone-deaf in places. Camp elements were jarring (WTF with the cake scene?) and mixed up with mania/obsessions in the wrong scenes. Sound design and color symbology were A++!

Think I would have preferred seeing the movie from the POV of Winona's character.

Thought Portman did well with what was given her but wish she spent as much time finding an emotional core (even if a broken one) as she did training for the dancing. Still don't like her though.

Stockhausen's Ekranoplan Quartet (Elvis Telecom), Wednesday, 26 January 2011 21:10 (fifteen years ago)

Did I say it upthread? Liked it, but would have loved this were it dialogue-free after the first few scenes. Not silent. Just dialogue-free. And not because I hate the dialogue, just because it would have been more effectiv sans dialogue, like the end of "Te Red Shoes." It's about a narrative form that tells stories through dance, so the parallel would have been intriguing. To me, at least.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 21:14 (fifteen years ago)

how badly do you want this to happen? (I've still got "julie & julia minus julie" on the backburner)

Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 22:20 (fifteen years ago)

"Julie & Julia Minus Julie" would have been great. They should assemble that movie out of leftover footage, the same way they assembled that entire second "Anchorman" movie out of outtakes.

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 23:21 (fifteen years ago)

Though that proposed title reminds me too much of this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBsE4ICwivA

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 26 January 2011 23:21 (fifteen years ago)

I dug it. Great fun. Kind of hilarious too.

thirdalternative, Thursday, 27 January 2011 13:46 (fifteen years ago)

A couple of interesting videos about CGI special effects in the movie

http://www.towleroad.com/2011/01/watch-the-cgi-in-black-swan-explained.html

also, that Christmas tree has a dildo on its head (Jesse), Friday, 28 January 2011 19:41 (fifteen years ago)

The quills gross me the fuck out.

also, that Christmas tree has a dildo on its head (Jesse), Friday, 28 January 2011 19:43 (fifteen years ago)

i want to see this again so bad

i like lucy (surm), Friday, 28 January 2011 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

i can see it for free so maybe i'll go this weekend!

i like lucy (surm), Friday, 28 January 2011 19:47 (fifteen years ago)

The quills gross me the fuck out.

― also, that Christmas tree has a dildo on its head (Jesse), Friday, January 28, 2011 2:43 PM (27 minutes ago) Bookmark

SO awesome but also so so gross. I had goosebumps during that scene for a couple of reasons only one of which was how horrifying the idea of sprouting feathers is.

‎\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Friday, 28 January 2011 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

That kind of fantasy is where Aranofsky loses me. Toes stuck together were grosser for my brain.

An Artily Shot Sesame Street (Eazy), Friday, 28 January 2011 20:12 (fifteen years ago)

I thought she was going to grab a knife and de-web her toes. I would have lost my shit.

boots get knocked from here to czechoslovakier (milo z), Friday, 28 January 2011 20:20 (fifteen years ago)

I thought she was too.

‎\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Friday, 28 January 2011 20:21 (fifteen years ago)

omg me too

i like lucy (surm), Friday, 28 January 2011 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

i was like stop

i like lucy (surm), Friday, 28 January 2011 20:22 (fifteen years ago)

<3

‎\(^o\) (/o^)/ (ENBB), Friday, 28 January 2011 20:23 (fifteen years ago)

congealed undifferentiated mass of portman would have been a great action figure/superbouncyball

Philip Nunez, Friday, 28 January 2011 20:48 (fifteen years ago)

The quills in the skin reminded me of stuff I've read about Morgellons disease. Very creepy though probably not real.

nickn, Friday, 28 January 2011 21:35 (fifteen years ago)

Skin sprouting wrong stuff or playing host to parasitic flora or fauna are horrifying for me. The story in Creepshow where the guy (Jody verrel, played Stephen King IIRC) gets cover in green stuff is almost more than I can handle. Jenny has told me about dreams in which she grows a single huge hair on her back and plucks it out and I feel weak and queasy when I think about that.

also, that Christmas tree has a dildo on its head (Jesse), Friday, 28 January 2011 23:11 (fifteen years ago)

Actually, parasitic flora is >>>>>>>>>> worse than fauna for some reason.

also, that Christmas tree has a dildo on its head (Jesse), Friday, 28 January 2011 23:13 (fifteen years ago)

ooh what's that short film about this lady who makes a dude out of hair + magic, and he's got a stray hair and when she tugs at it there's just more and more hair coming out till finally it's a single hairball and a deflated bag of skin?

Philip Nunez, Friday, 28 January 2011 23:16 (fifteen years ago)

one thing i have been wanting to say is that i think natalie portman made playing this part look easy

i like lucy (surm), Friday, 28 January 2011 23:24 (fifteen years ago)

( i hope i didn't already say that, i forget )

i like lucy (surm), Friday, 28 January 2011 23:24 (fifteen years ago)

surm you can say anything as many times as you'd like and we will still all love you so much.

vienn?tta (Stevie D(eux)), Saturday, 29 January 2011 00:06 (fifteen years ago)

^^^

VegemiteGrrrl, Saturday, 29 January 2011 00:23 (fifteen years ago)

you guys i just think you are so sweet

i like lucy (surm), Saturday, 29 January 2011 00:46 (fifteen years ago)

Jenny has told me about dreams in which she grows a single huge hair on her back and plucks it out and I feel weak and queasy when I think about that.

I had one where the hairs on my arm had become super-sized, they were all rubbery and each about two inches thick. I could feel their roots shifting under my skin. Really freaky, it haunted me for days.

Inevitable stupid dubstep mix (chap), Saturday, 29 January 2011 12:28 (fifteen years ago)

finally a shout out to Creepshow!

lol at the witch trials (Drugs A. Money), Saturday, 29 January 2011 19:15 (fifteen years ago)

And Creepshow has a cake in it too.

thirdalternative, Saturday, 29 January 2011 19:37 (fifteen years ago)

<3 creepshow!

tehresa, Saturday, 29 January 2011 19:50 (fifteen years ago)

is this movie misogynist discuss

My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic (Princess TamTam), Friday, 4 February 2011 07:44 (fourteen years ago)

no

next

VegemiteGrrrl, Friday, 4 February 2011 07:45 (fourteen years ago)

I hadn't thought about it as such before just now but it's an interesting question. On the one hand, every single major female character in the movie is at least unstable but more often completely nuts. Nina, her mother, Mila Kunis' character, Winona - all of them. They seem to be this way largely because of their inability to handle the pressure/stress of the world of ballet. They couldn't cope and so they cracked. Even the mom had been a dancer when she was younger, right? I guess this could be seen as portraying women as weak and incompetent but I thought of it more as a critique of the misogyny inherent in ballet then actually being misogynistic in and of itself. I mean there are other aspects that could probably be seen as pretty misogynistic. They women are largely catty, self-serving and manipulative but again, I saw this all as a result of their involvement with ballet.

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 15:17 (fourteen years ago)

V. Cassel's character was a creep too, though. I thought everybody came across crazy or an asshole or both, no gender bias in the misanthropy.

The Gilded Palace of Hatcat (pixel farmer), Friday, 4 February 2011 15:24 (fourteen years ago)

Portman is making an Agony Face through nearly all the movie, how did she make it look easy?

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 February 2011 15:28 (fourteen years ago)

When a film is this subjective I don't think notions of misogyny really come into play. Two of the three other women in the film don't come off very well, but then again we're seeing everything through the eyes of a paranoid basket case who's mind is breaking apart.

Gukbe, Friday, 4 February 2011 15:29 (fourteen years ago)

Probably closed her eyes and thought of her favorite Slant reviews. xp

The Gilded Palace of Hatcat (pixel farmer), Friday, 4 February 2011 15:30 (fourteen years ago)

When a film is this subjective I don't think notions of misogyny really come into play. Two of the three other women in the film don't come off very well, but then again we're seeing everything through the eyes of a paranoid basket case who's mind is breaking apart.

True. I think that also has something to it. I don't know that Kunis' character comes off all that well tbh. I mean she's surely more sane than the other three but she's still depicted as the "wild child" who drugs people unknowingly and so not entirely healthy either tbh.

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 15:35 (fourteen years ago)

This movie isn't saying women are crazy/evil. It's saying that artists are!

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 February 2011 15:37 (fourteen years ago)

my wife and some of her friends found it pretty misogynistic

gotta admit that having hot ballerinas lez up is some schoolboy fantasy shit dressed up in fine cinema clothing, and not everybody is gonna react positively to the titillation factor

iirc the point was made upthread that the movie could have taken a stand by having the main character freak out and take action against the entire power structure the ballet and its director represents, THIS MACHINE EATS BALLERINAS lol, but she just passively self-destructs in a most beautiful way and the message seems to be o well crazy girl couldn't handle the bigtime, and not that the sexist power structure of the ballet company is inherently flawed and needs changing

I could see a feminist reading of the movie's conclusion as "kill the ballerina whore and let the ballet director john walk scot free"

tedious all beef patties shipley sauce whiney deej (Edward III), Friday, 4 February 2011 15:38 (fourteen years ago)

she's still depicted as the "wild child" who drugs people unknowingly

OR DOES SHE?!?!?!?!?!

Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Friday, 4 February 2011 15:38 (fourteen years ago)

I think Kunis comes off as however Portman is thinking of her from scene to scene.

xpost

Gukbe, Friday, 4 February 2011 15:39 (fourteen years ago)

talking point: cassel as stand-in for aronofsky

tedious all beef patties shipley sauce whiney deej (Edward III), Friday, 4 February 2011 15:39 (fourteen years ago)

and Portman a stand-in for Weisz on the set of The Fountain?

Gukbe, Friday, 4 February 2011 15:41 (fourteen years ago)

portman as a stand-in for portman... or maybe j connelly

tedious all beef patties shipley sauce whiney deej (Edward III), Friday, 4 February 2011 15:41 (fourteen years ago)

iirc the point was made upthread that the movie could have taken a stand by having the main character freak out and take action against the entire power structure the ballet and its director represents, THIS MACHINE EATS BALLERINAS lol, but she just passively self-destructs in a most beautiful way and the message seems to be o well crazy girl couldn't handle the bigtime, and not that the sexist power structure of the ballet company is inherently flawed and needs changing

Oh I didn't see that point upthread but that's what I was sort of trying to say. I can easily see how it could be viewed as such but it didn't even occur to me to think about it in that way until this I saw PTT's question.

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 15:43 (fourteen years ago)

and that's still not the main impression that I took away from it.

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 15:44 (fourteen years ago)

she's still depicted as the "wild child" who drugs people unknowingly

OR DOES SHE?!?!?!?!?!

― Tyler/Perry's "Dude (Looks Like a Lady)" (jaymc), Friday, February 4, 2011 10:38 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark

fair enough

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 15:44 (fourteen years ago)

Cassel is a walking cliche from every dance melodrama for 60-70 years

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 February 2011 15:55 (fourteen years ago)

I must've missed the fingerbanging scene in the turning point

tedious all beef patties shipley sauce whiney deej (Edward III), Friday, 4 February 2011 15:59 (fourteen years ago)

xpost ...all of which you were there to see in person?

i pl0p bombs like hiroshima (San Te), Friday, 4 February 2011 15:59 (fourteen years ago)

When a film is this subjective I don't think notions of misogyny really come into play. Two of the three other women in the film don't come off very well, but then again we're seeing everything through the eyes of a paranoid basket case who's mind is breaking apart.

― Gukbe, Friday, February 4, 2011 10:29 AM (29 minutes ago) Bookmark

you could use this line of reasoning to justify almost anything happen in the movie... lucky for us in aronofsky's world of cinema the paranoid schizophrenics have super hot fantasies, I was waiting for a lingerie pillow fight to break out O WAIT IT DID

maybe unfair to compare to polanski's repulsion but really the movie asks for it, and not that I think repulsion is some great feminist screed, but at least the main character's sexual fantasies in it are actually terrifying, not titillating

tedious all beef patties shipley sauce whiney deej (Edward III), Friday, 4 February 2011 16:01 (fourteen years ago)

sorry didn't mean to get all marc loi up in here

tedious all beef patties shipley sauce whiney deej (Edward III), Friday, 4 February 2011 16:03 (fourteen years ago)

i agree w/ e3 i think

max, Friday, 4 February 2011 16:07 (fourteen years ago)

max loi

tedious all beef patties shipley sauce whiney deej (Edward III), Friday, 4 February 2011 16:10 (fourteen years ago)

str8 men really are as pathetic as gay men.

kind of shrill and very self-righteous (Dr Morbius), Friday, 4 February 2011 16:10 (fourteen years ago)

you could use this line of reasoning to justify almost anything happen in the movie

I know it's murky waters, but I meant that in this film it is particularly subjective, and every characterisation is just that much more skewed. And yes lol lesbian male fantasies etc, but trashy doesn't necessarily mean misogynistic.

Gukbe, Friday, 4 February 2011 16:12 (fourteen years ago)

lol @ max loi - There's no doubt that these are all really good points and valid criticisms and now E3's got me thinking that I really need to see it again since it's been a while at this point. I just think it's interesting that I didn't really get that feeling from the movie during the first viewing but I'd like to watch it again with all this in mind.

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 16:15 (fourteen years ago)

aronofsky is no john waters

xp

tedious all beef patties shipley sauce whiney deej (Edward III), Friday, 4 February 2011 16:17 (fourteen years ago)

Would have been better as a serious movie but this was fun. What made me chuckle the most where the little sexy ssshHHHSAAAA sighs every time something spooky was about to happen to Portman.

Umm, I think that's my glass. (laser precise purpose maker era), Friday, 4 February 2011 16:29 (fourteen years ago)

THIS MACHINE EATS BALLERINAS

want this t-shirt

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 4 February 2011 17:36 (fourteen years ago)

e3 is right, tho -- the redemptive tone of the ending pretty much pardons the physical & psychic ravages of the ballet and its attendant power structure -- it's all justified in the end by the 'perfect' performance. stunning the director with her wow-bang backstage kiss kinda foils any attempt to read this as a critique of ballet's sexual politics, imho.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 4 February 2011 18:22 (fourteen years ago)

elmo too bad you don't work at a company that produces t-shirts

tedious all beef patties shipley sauce whiney deej (Edward III), Friday, 4 February 2011 20:43 (fourteen years ago)

foils any attempt to read this as a critique of ballet's sexual politics, imho.

― tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, February 4, 2011 1:22 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark

and ppl might respond "but that's not the kind of movie he's making" and that's where I call bullshit cuz he foregrounds sex-as-power themes through the whole thing, so he raises all these sexual politics questions without handling them successfully, and at the end he's just like "hope you enjoyed the ride thrillho please come again"

a led zep of one (Edward III), Friday, 4 February 2011 20:53 (fourteen years ago)

yea, i think the more obvious problem is the shitty attitudes this movie portrays re: females having sexual agency -- mom's a ruined woman, lily is wanton & druggy, winona is clingy & desperate, and nina's full-on psychotic

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 4 February 2011 21:13 (fourteen years ago)

Man when she tugs the hangnail and it just goes right down her arm it had me SQUIRMING

Trip Maker, Friday, 4 February 2011 21:14 (fourteen years ago)

i appreciate both lily and nina's sexual agency

i like lucy (surm), Friday, 4 February 2011 21:22 (fourteen years ago)

wanton, druggy and psychotic are valid plights to exploit for the sake of a movie; they are not human qualities as seedy or unusual as it might seem

i like lucy (surm), Friday, 4 February 2011 21:23 (fourteen years ago)

always good qualities in a mate or a ballerina

a led zep of one (Edward III), Friday, 4 February 2011 21:25 (fourteen years ago)

yeah this movie was p woman-hatery

goole, Friday, 4 February 2011 21:27 (fourteen years ago)

I don't necessarily disagree with E3/Elmo because the female leads are obv depicted as such and that is problematic on some level but the question is why are they that way? If it's the whole they couldn't hack it because they are weak women thing I mean - I get that but maybe the amount of pressure they're under would crack anyone regardless of gender. We don't really know because it's a movie largely about female ballerinas. I mean, the sole male character isn't exactly portrayed in a positive light either. I also wonder if her nailing the final dance can't be viewed some other way. Sorry - sort of just thinking out loud here.

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 21:30 (fourteen years ago)

everybody in it is some combination of crazy, stupid and hateful. yes "that's the story" but, really, was the world in need of more crazy bitches hating each other? they are not crazy because of the pressure of ballet, the story was made about ballet dancers as a pretext for showing crazy women

i didn't not-enjoy it btw

goole, Friday, 4 February 2011 21:32 (fourteen years ago)

everything i've heard about ballet is super depressing and nutso anyway tho, so what do i know.

goole, Friday, 4 February 2011 21:33 (fourteen years ago)

how you guys feel about this movie in comparison to drag me to hell w/r/t woman's issues?

Philip Nunez, Friday, 4 February 2011 21:33 (fourteen years ago)

they are not crazy because of the pressure of ballet, the story was made about ballet dancers as a pretext for showing crazy women

See I guess it's this that I don't necessarily agree with but I don't know anything either so . . .

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 21:36 (fourteen years ago)

well i don't think the misogyny is specifically evident in one event in the film vs any other event in the film, it's more outside the frame i guess. a filmmaker gets up in the morning, decides to tell a story instead of all other potential stories. why do this one?

goole, Friday, 4 February 2011 21:39 (fourteen years ago)

If I weren't exhausted I would go see this again tonight. That's how much I've been thinking about this all day and how frustrated I am that I can't remember certain details enough to make up my mind about this. Like, I only vaguely remember her kissing him at the end? Was that right before she died? Ugh. Frustrated!

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 21:41 (fourteen years ago)

Lily seemed extremely normal and relatable to me...? Definitely in comparison to everyone around her that the movie focused on, anyway.

Also I am probably misremembering something but the mother's sexual past doesn't ever actually come up IIRC; I thought she was presented as a failed dancer before she ever had a child.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 4 February 2011 21:44 (fourteen years ago)

Mother does comment about "not making the same mistake I made."

Trip Maker, Friday, 4 February 2011 21:45 (fourteen years ago)

IIRC getting pregnant with Nina is what made the mom have to quit dancing?

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 21:47 (fourteen years ago)

iirc the mother's career ending is attributed to her pregnancy -- the scene is where she asks nina whether the director has "tried anything," and she doesn't want nina making "the same mistakes" or something along those lines

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 4 February 2011 21:47 (fourteen years ago)

yeah, exactly

ENBB, Friday, 4 February 2011 21:48 (fourteen years ago)

see what i mean?? perfect

YOU RUINED MY LIFE MY DARLING SWEET BABY GIRL NOW DO AS I SAY

tho i guess some people who aren't into anything have moms like that ha

goole, Friday, 4 February 2011 21:48 (fourteen years ago)

Oh right, kind of forgot about that in light of Nina's "well you sucked anyway, pregnancy didn't change much" comment later in the movie.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 4 February 2011 21:50 (fourteen years ago)

the implication being that the mother was also victim to the same sexual power structure that ruined beth & threatens nina -- but again, the power structure is totally absolved by the ending imho -- she triumphs because of, not in spite of it

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 4 February 2011 21:55 (fourteen years ago)

whereas in drag me to hell, the heroine was dragged to hell.

Philip Nunez, Friday, 4 February 2011 22:02 (fourteen years ago)

I don't mind the unsympathetic characters, we're grownups and we don't need some shining examples of good behavior to evaluate what we're being shown

I just think there was a huge opportunity for aronofsky to turn the whole thing in on itself, create a real hall of mirrors, but he seemed content with delivering on the superficial angles (and if he hadn't it probably wouldn't have grossed $100M and counting so what do I know)

lily is a sympathetic character but the film builds to a cathartic moment which is ultimately self-destructive and not really transcendent - it just reinforces her trapped-ness in the director's world (aronofsky and/or cassel's, both seem willing to exploit her for her body anyway)

still haven't seen drag me to hell but if you want a more complex look at an unsympathetically powerless character, look at haynes' safe

a led zep of one (Edward III), Friday, 4 February 2011 22:10 (fourteen years ago)

I don't mean to say it's more complex, but it does offer a kind of counterfactual to the absolution argument --
the trouble for the heroine ramps up when she succumbs to pressure to bring out her own black swan when she denies the old lady a loan extension, and the ending doesn't read as a condemnation of the power structure that put her there but rather comeuppance for succumbing to it.

Philip Nunez, Friday, 4 February 2011 22:23 (fourteen years ago)

hm. i don't disagree but DMTH is complicated by the fact that in the course of trying to lift the curse, she indulges in increasingly 'evil' behavior, including ~~SPOIL~~ murdering kittens, summoning demons, & defiling graves. though it's interesting that one of her last acts before being dragged to hell is to make expensive impulse purchase..,

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 4 February 2011 22:32 (fourteen years ago)

Lol E3, it is kind of hilarious that, in the construction of your argument re: the misogyny of the movie, you seems to have swapped Nina and Lily! Oops.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 4 February 2011 22:44 (fourteen years ago)

I don't think this movie is overly sympathetic towards any of it's characters EXCEPT Lily, where her most unsympathetic acts are wholly fabricated within Nina's head.

(the bitchiest she gets is being totally ungracious when Nina shows up on opening night, which was not very nice but IMO an understandable, credible reaction, and one she later apologizes for)

Maybe the random dudes in the bar should get some sympathy for being led on by hot dancers, lol.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 4 February 2011 22:48 (fourteen years ago)

Oh, and there's the other bit-player ballerina that Vincent plays against Lily for the part; she garners practically all of the sympathy the movie can muster just from the cruel way she loses out in the mind games Vincent was playing on Nina.

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 4 February 2011 22:50 (fourteen years ago)

Ha I'm doing it now too

Ballerinas, they all look alike anyway

Indolence Mission (DJP), Friday, 4 February 2011 22:51 (fourteen years ago)

haha details details

a led zep of one (Edward III), Friday, 4 February 2011 23:10 (fourteen years ago)

yeah even sexual politics aside for the moment, i think DA is far too fascinated with the milieu he's set his story in to offer any thoughtful critique of it per se. like, the wrestler definitely displayed the harsher realities of that sport but they were sensationalized in a pretty voyeuristic way imho, and even there those realities are similarly pardoned by the protagonist's final performance.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Friday, 4 February 2011 23:12 (fourteen years ago)

You guys remember that she dies in the end, right? It's not justification for the psychosis. The only thing that has any degree of subtlety in the film is the fact that the great cathartic release we're all waiting on and grateful for is what kills her.

Gukbe, Saturday, 5 February 2011 05:41 (fourteen years ago)

right, and her mom is beaming proudly from the audience, her director is in awe, her peers and colleagues fawn over her obsequiously, and she has presumably won the glory of fame. all while dying oh so beautifully. it's the apotheosis of genius writ large: i don't think subtle is the word for it.

tangelo amour (elmo argonaut), Saturday, 5 February 2011 17:24 (fourteen years ago)

i kinda thought she was imagining her mum beaming. but who can say?

piscesx, Saturday, 5 February 2011 17:27 (fourteen years ago)

I thought everything after the stabbing was in her mind, with the director and the rest finding her in her dressing room rather than on stage.

nickn, Saturday, 5 February 2011 19:50 (fourteen years ago)

she's like the Travis Bickle of crazy-women!

ellj versus deej (Drugs A. Money), Saturday, 5 February 2011 23:26 (fourteen years ago)

I know I'm late here, but http://sickmouthy.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/home-of-the-black-swan

Ukranian crocodile that swallowed a mobile phone (Scik Mouthy), Saturday, 12 February 2011 20:48 (fourteen years ago)

three weeks pass...

http://i.imgur.com/ZO7BQ.jpg

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 12:47 (fourteen years ago)

Saw this again in the theater last night. Curiously tried to read it as a rompy camp fest and failed. Yes, there are mini-moments of campy hilarity (mom + bday cake, for one) but only a handful IMO. Really really enjoy this movie

plax (ico ico) (Stevie D(eux)), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 15:04 (fourteen years ago)

SPOILERS!

I wrote this text on another site to explain why I don't think Nina dies at the end... Thought I could share it with you too:

"According to Natalie Portman, Darren Aronofsky chose the placement of the blood on Nina's dress to make it resemble menstruation, so that it would symbolize Nina becoming a woman. It seems unrealistic Nina could've danced the whole second and third act (if we accept that Nina stabbed herself at the exact moment when she imagined stabbing Lily) without anyone noticing the bleeding. Also, it seems too convenient that the wound only starts bleeding heavily when the White Swan dies. Therefore, the wound either doesn't exist or is much smaller than what Nina thought. (Just like she imagined tearing the skin off her finger and causing a big wound, when in reality it was just bleeding a little.) So Nina doesn't die in the end.

Nina is at constant conflict with her superego, who says she should always remain in control, and her id, who says she should give in to her carnal desires. The superego in the movie is her mom, and the id is Lily. Nina is afraid that Lily, who is more in touch with her base instincts, is better at the role of the Black Swan, which is all about the id. That's why she externalizes her own id to Lily, imagining having sex with her, and fears Lily is trying to steal the role of the Black Swan from her. The mother, on the other hand, is constantly trying to control Nina, and in the end she even tries to stop her playing the Swan Princess, because she thinks Nina is losing her mind due to her role. The mother, therefore, is the superego, always keeping Nina in control and not letting her lose herself to her instincts. Because Nina has externalized both her superego and her id, she cannot grow up. She remains a little girl who can't take control of her own life or become a sexual being; that is, she cannot become an adult woman.

In order to grow up Nina needs to accept her superego and id as internal to her, and symbolically "kill" their external representations. She first does this to the mother, attacking her and saying she is moving out. (Significantly, she attacks her hands. Tthe mother in the movie is sort of a puppetmaster, and she uses her hands to paint pictures of Nina, recreating Nina in the way she wants her to be. Breaking the mother's fingers is a symbolic attack against her control.) Then she does it to Lily, stabbing her. Only after she has done these things can she fully become the Swan Princess. It's important to notice that after Nina has stopped externalizing parts of her own psyche to other people, the mother and Lily are no longer her "enemies". Lily comes to Nina's room to praise her performance as the Black Swan (the role Nina feared she would steal from her), and her mother is seen in the audience, looking ecstatically at Nina's performance of the role she previously feared would consume her daughter. This means Nina's superego and id have become part of her, they're not represented by other people anymore. She has finally become a grown-up woman, and this is symbolized by the blood on her dress, resembling menstrual blood. Nina doesn't die in the end of the movie, but is reborn as a mature human being, as someone who can reconciliate her need for control and desire to let it go."

I know this reading of Black Swan is heavy-handed and overtly symbolic, but so was the movie, IMO. Also, while I'm not the biggest fan of Freud myself, I can't imagine the heavy Freudian tone of the movie wasn't deliberate.

Tuomas, Thursday, 17 March 2011 13:07 (fourteen years ago)

SPOILERS!

My take is that the director replaces her with Lily for the 2nd and 3rd acts because of her fall in the first act. Nina then stabs herself in her dressing room and the brilliant performance and adoring fans are all her dying hallucinations. After the play the rest of the group finds her (dead or nearly so). I do remember Lily being one of the dancers gathered around her at the end, but don't remember what she was wearing. Does anyone remember if she was in black swan getup?

nickn, Thursday, 17 March 2011 16:08 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.slashfilm.com/natalie-portmans-body-double-claims-portman-5-percent-fullbody-dancing-black-swan/#more-101139

half of me totally believes that portman couldn't have so much daring grace in that final, breathtaking scene (thus i believe the woman's claim) - the other half is like.. so what? is not winning an oscar herself really disconcerting her that much?

Radical Adults Lick Based God Style (kelpolaris), Saturday, 26 March 2011 04:06 (fourteen years ago)

everyone knows that any shots involving legs weren't portman, non-story

I’d argue that the idea that Portman did most of the dancing in the film was instrumental to her popularity going into the Oscar race.

retarded

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Saturday, 26 March 2011 06:21 (fourteen years ago)

Y'know, I wasn't that taken with the film. Partially because I don't like Natalie Portman very much - okay, I hate her guts, there I said it - but also partially because I had, as always, high expectations. It was a bit meh. I thought the story was a bit mediocre. :-(

Nathalie (stevienixed), Saturday, 26 March 2011 14:19 (fourteen years ago)

Also, I would be astounded if she had done all the dance scenes. No way could she learn all those moves in a short period. Ridiculous.

Nathalie (stevienixed), Saturday, 26 March 2011 14:20 (fourteen years ago)

She spent a year training kinda full-time...

Magnum PI and Fashion-Forward Dudes (Eazy), Saturday, 26 March 2011 15:42 (fourteen years ago)

She had ballet training earlier in her life as well, iirc. "Medicore" is an odd word to use for this though. Overwrought, maybe.

Hippocratic Oaf (DavidM), Saturday, 26 March 2011 15:46 (fourteen years ago)

She spent a year training kinda full-time...

― Magnum PI and Fashion-Forward Dudes (Eazy), Saturday, March 26, 2011 11:42 AM (Yesterday) Bookmark

that's basically nothing

ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Sunday, 27 March 2011 04:25 (fourteen years ago)

xpost I found it mediocre because, really, it was a cliche riddled movie. An anorexic ballet dancer who clearly hates her mother, is rather frigid, until she has some naughty dreams with Kunis. No, I am sorry, I did not find this to be anything but mediocre. I adore Vincent Cassel but honestly his role was just rubbish. The more I think about it, the less I like this film. Portman was very lacklustre, in my opinion but then isn't she always? I a hesitant because I am a big A fan but then, no, this was not a good movie at all. I don't think the body double is an issue. I mean, really, if they had used Portman, it would be an affront to the real ballerinas. A year training? Please, it takes a lot of talent and training to be a ballerina.

Nathalie (stevienixed), Sunday, 27 March 2011 08:59 (fourteen years ago)

This was totally movie of the week type shit up until the last half hour, when the promised operatic horror really flowered. The fact that we had Tchaikovsky as the soundtrack rather than the beyond redemption weak piss original score helped a lot.

henri grenouille (Frogman Henry), Sunday, 27 March 2011 09:38 (fourteen years ago)

everyone knows that any shots involving legs weren't portman, non-story

― ℳℴℯ ❤\(◕‿◕✿ (Princess TamTam), Saturday, March 26, 2011 2:21 AM (2 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah i mean i just assumed

ice cr?m, Monday, 28 March 2011 14:15 (fourteen years ago)

but it is a story if everyone was claiming that natty porty did most of the dancing, thats dumb and lame and they deserve to be called out for being so

ice cr?m, Monday, 28 March 2011 14:15 (fourteen years ago)

didnt they jus like cgi her face on an actual dancer - feel like i heard that

― ice cr?m, Sunday, December 5, 2010 2:21 PM (3 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

no

― shirley summistake (s1ocki), Sunday, December 5, 2010 2:25 PM (3 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah p sure that did slki

― ice cr?m, Sunday, December 5, 2010 2:26 PM (3 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

O SHIT

ice cr?m, Monday, 28 March 2011 14:18 (fourteen years ago)

Also, I would be astounded if she had done all the dance scenes.

next thing people will be claiming that Arnold Schwarzenegger was not a real robot in Terminator.

The New Dirty Vicar, Tuesday, 29 March 2011 11:41 (fourteen years ago)

Aronofsky weighs in:
“Here is the reality. I had my editor count shots. There are 139 dance shots in the film. 111 are Natalie Portman untouched. 28 are her dance double Sarah Lane. If you do the math that’s 80% Natalie Portman. What about duration? The shots that feature the double are wide shots and rarely play for longer than one second. There are two complicated longer dance sequences that we used face replacement. Even so, if we were judging by time over 90% would be Natalie Portman.
And to be clear Natalie did dance on pointe in pointe shoes. If you look at the final shot of the opening prologue, which lasts 85 seconds, and was danced completely by Natalie, she exits the scene on pointe. That is completely her without any digital magic. I am responding to this to put this to rest and to defend my actor. Natalie sweated long and hard to deliver a great physical and emotional performance. And I don’t want anyone to think that’s not her they are watching. It is.”
http://insidemovies.ew.com/2011/03/28/darren-aronofsky-black-swan-controversy/

Hippocratic Oaf (DavidM), Thursday, 31 March 2011 22:00 (fourteen years ago)

its not

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 31 March 2011 22:02 (fourteen years ago)

obv implication is that the 28 were her best scenes, for example: the actual swan dance.

wonder if how foreign natalie looks w/ the face-paint on has to do with the face replacement? just putting it out there, tho rly don't believe that something big as that would just be an oversight

kelpolaris, Thursday, 31 March 2011 22:02 (fourteen years ago)

btw finding out about this 'face replacement' thing, which they used to twin Armie Hammer, spoiled almost the only thing I liked about The Social Network.

your generation appalls me (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 31 March 2011 23:40 (fourteen years ago)

jus a lil face replacement lets all be cool

ice cr?m, Thursday, 31 March 2011 23:42 (fourteen years ago)

btw finding out about this 'face replacement' thing, which they used to twin Armie Hammer, spoiled almost the only thing I liked about The Social Network.

Why's that? Were you more impressed when you thought it was a practical effect instead of CG?

reggaeton for the painfully alone (polyphonic), Thursday, 31 March 2011 23:45 (fourteen years ago)

i shudder to think if face/off were made today. you'd have to see travolta doing 100% of the castor troy parts.

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 31 March 2011 23:49 (fourteen years ago)

best scene is when natalie portman sees herself in the mirror then shes not sure if its really herself then she smashes the mirror but then youre not sure if its real then what is real anyway then the mirror is not smashed so it wasnt real then or wasnt it, natalie portman and the girl from the 70s show are hot ballerinas

― ice cr?m, Saturday, December 4, 2010 1:43 PM (4 months ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

no j/k best scene is when they lez out

― ice cr?m, Saturday, December 4, 2010 1:44 PM (4 months ago) Bookmark

this kinda sums it up for me.
we saw this wednesday and it took us a couple of beers to figure this out whereas ice cr?m had it right in december fercrisakes

bloodshot eyes natalie gave me the heebie jeebies (jdchurchill), Sunday, 10 April 2011 16:12 (fourteen years ago)

crazy body double girl is on 20/20 tonight!

tehresa, Saturday, 16 April 2011 02:29 (fourteen years ago)

three weeks pass...

this film was good but not relevant enough to justify reading all 209879 of your posts abt it

no xmas for jonchaies (nakhchivan), Monday, 9 May 2011 23:28 (fourteen years ago)

i just hope that your opinions were corcucasting, if correct, and poignant, if wrong

no xmas for jonchaies (nakhchivan), Monday, 9 May 2011 23:29 (fourteen years ago)

saw this again a couple nights ago. enjoyed it the second time around, but nowhere near as much (watching it on a crappy old TV probably had a lot to do with this). still thought it was ridiculously overblown and consequently hilarious throughout, but without the first-viewing suspense, it did drag a little towards the middle. even more impressed by portman's performance than i was before, though.

normal_fantasy-unicorns (contenderizer), Monday, 9 May 2011 23:38 (fourteen years ago)

two months pass...

i saw this on the plane last night

i have only read half this thread even though i was quite enjoying it, sooo tired. i quite enjoyed the film but had no idea it was meant to be campy until i read ilx! i mean obv it's a bit ridic and ott but i definitely didn't laugh at any point, it gets quite effectively horror-movie scary as it progresses.

few things i particularly liked: the constant body horror aspect. the way it dodged its clichés by subverting some of them (eg: no evidence to suggest lily was anything other than a perfectly normal and actually quite nice girl) (wkiw lily, totally). thought nina's need to be the "good girl" was at the heart of it all really - from the very start her casting is tainted by this when she accidentally congratulates a rival, which then seems like taunting. her need to be liked by everyone is pathological and drives her madness. though that's also why i never quite connected with her character until the real derangement set in (and she found her "evil", potentially murderous side). meta stuff there re: method acting and female roles in hollywood too. and the paranoia of artistic endeavour was pretty otm too.

rolled eyes quite hard at the lesbian scene but i don't think it was completely gratituitous.

natalie portman was great obv but i think mila kunis's performance is underrated - the effectiveness of the reality/fantasy blurring was in part due to the thin line kunis brought between the easy-going, good-hearted good-time girl that lily actually was, and the darkside temptress that nina imagined her to be,

lex pretend, Thursday, 14 July 2011 12:44 (fourteen years ago)

i've never heard it called "rolling ayes" before

caek, Thursday, 14 July 2011 12:50 (fourteen years ago)

ah, hoisted by my own retard.

caek, Thursday, 14 July 2011 12:51 (fourteen years ago)

hoisted by my own retard.

noting this down for future use

lex pretend, Thursday, 14 July 2011 12:58 (fourteen years ago)

lex OTM

HOOBASTANK is my co-pilot (DJP), Thursday, 14 July 2011 13:06 (fourteen years ago)

ten months pass...

finally watched this last night - the constant mechanical/slurping/licking noises throughout really creeped me the fuck out (i was watching it with headphones).

just1n3, Saturday, 26 May 2012 07:06 (thirteen years ago)

Saw this last week, I thought it was thoroughly stupid.

Captain Jean-Luc Godard (Leee), Saturday, 26 May 2012 23:32 (thirteen years ago)

I biggest disappointment of this film is that I found it in fact not thoroughly stupid, but more than stupid enough to make up for the stuff it gets right. In some ways those are the movies that bug me the most, the ones with potential that blow it for dumb or convenient reasons.

Anyway, things that would have made this good:

1) If you're going to make a movie about someone going crazy, don't start them out crazy.

2) If you're going to make a movie about someone going crazy, you don't need to surround them with other crazy people (not mom, not Wynona)

3) She should have turned into the swan and then died. The end. None of that lame it was all in her head post-script. Leave the audience with the possibility, however implausible, that she actually turned into a fucking bird and brought down the house at the ballet.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 27 May 2012 03:11 (thirteen years ago)

1) If you're going to make a movie about someone going crazy, don't start them out crazy.

ILX's #1 horror flick disagrees w/ you.

Anyway, Portman didn't strike me as any more immediately crazy than the average performing-arts type.

Simon H., Sunday, 27 May 2012 03:19 (thirteen years ago)

black swan rools, ilx drools

lag∞n, Sunday, 27 May 2012 03:23 (thirteen years ago)

jesus we had a 1100 post thread on this

johnny crunch, Sunday, 27 May 2012 03:32 (thirteen years ago)

ah, hoisted by my own retard.

― caek, Thursday, July 14, 2011 8:51 AM (10 months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

hoisted by my own retard.

noting this down for future use

― lex pretend, Thursday, July 14, 2011 8:58 AM (10 months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

joek stolen by iunucci, etc on veep & not funny either time

johnny crunch, Sunday, 27 May 2012 03:33 (thirteen years ago)

funny in veep for the way it played out though

Fas Ro Duh (Gukbe), Sunday, 27 May 2012 04:24 (thirteen years ago)

black swan rools, ilx drools

― lag∞n, Saturday, May 26, 2012 11:23 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Sunday, 27 May 2012 05:21 (thirteen years ago)

josh no offense but your suggestions are terrible

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Sunday, 27 May 2012 05:21 (thirteen years ago)

she should have turned into a bird and flied away and made the audience cry

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Sunday, 27 May 2012 05:22 (thirteen years ago)

*single bird tear*

lag∞n, Sunday, 27 May 2012 05:24 (thirteen years ago)

i still think she should have totally lost her marbles at the end, in the middle of her big performance. like a full-bore screaming, crying, pants-shitting meltdown on NYC's grand stage. running around flapping her arms going "thbbbb thbbbb". that would have been something to see.

spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Sunday, 27 May 2012 06:06 (thirteen years ago)

i don't get how someone who is a bit wacky going full on nuts is more boring/not as interesting than someone who is totally sane doing it.

piscesx, Sunday, 27 May 2012 11:45 (thirteen years ago)

Oh, come on, given how ridiculous this movie is, I don't think any suggestions could be terrible. Offense taken!

>:(

P.S. Turning into a bird and flying away would have been even better. Then they could have a sequel with her trying to fit into the flock as it migrates south. It could be Aronofsky's edgy adaptation of "The Ugly Duckling."

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 27 May 2012 13:18 (thirteen years ago)

she should have turned into birdman

A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Sunday, 27 May 2012 14:50 (thirteen years ago)

seven months pass...

this was decent, lex otm

"i mean obv it's a bit ridic and ott but i definitely didn't laugh at any point, it gets quite effectively horror-movie scary as it progresses."

buzza, Sunday, 30 December 2012 08:38 (thirteen years ago)

ten months pass...

definitely getting to the 2nd half

surm, Tuesday, 26 November 2013 07:49 (twelve years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.